Page last updated: 2024-11-04

lidocaine

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Occurs in Manufacturing Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Lidocaine is a local anesthetic that works by blocking nerve impulses. It is synthesized from 2,6-dimethylaniline and 2-chloro-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)acetamide. Lidocaine is primarily used to numb pain, often for medical procedures, dental work, and topical pain relief. Its effects are rapid onset and short duration. Lidocaine is studied for its potential use in treating various medical conditions, including neuropathic pain, cardiac arrhythmias, and epilepsy. It is an important drug due to its effectiveness in pain management and its relatively safe profile.'

Lidocaine: A local anesthetic and cardiac depressant used as an antiarrhythmia agent. Its actions are more intense and its effects more prolonged than those of PROCAINE but its duration of action is shorter than that of BUPIVACAINE or PRILOCAINE. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

lidocaine : The monocarboxylic acid amide resulting from the formal condensation of N,N-diethylglycine with 2,6-dimethylaniline. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID3676
CHEMBL ID79
CHEBI ID6456
SCHEMBL ID15689
SCHEMBL ID17967359
MeSH IDM0012483

Synonyms (635)

Synonym
BIDD:GT0342
MLS001074177
HMS3393C21
AB00053581-28
BRD-K52662033-001-02-6
BRD-K52662033-003-05-5
gtpl2623
solarcaine
gravocain
nsc-40030
2', 2-(diethylamino)-
lida-mantle
nsc40030
esracaine
leostesin
xllina
.alpha.-(diethylamino)-2,6-acetoxylidide
lignocaine
solcain
.omega.-diethylamino-2,6-dimethylacetanilide
maricaine
xycaine
duncaine
cito optadren
.alpha.-diethylaminoaceto-2,6-xylidide
xylestesin
2-(diethylamino)-2',6'-acetoxylidide
rucaina
xylotox
isicaina
xylocitin
xilina
xylocain
cappicaine
wln: 2n2 & 1vmr b1 f1
xyloneural (free base)
.alpha.-diethylamino-2,6-dimethylacetanilide
xylocaine
isicaine
diethylaminoaceto-2,6-xylidide
l-caine
MLS000069724 ,
DIVK1C_001323
KBIO1_000174
DIVK1C_000174
embolex
CDS1_000283 ,
SPECTRUM_001118
2',6'-acetoxylidide, 2-(diethylamino)-
acetamide, 2-(diethylamino)-n-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-
BIO1_000379
BIO2_000559
NCGC00015611-02
cas-73-78-9
lopac-l-5647
BIO2_000079
BIO1_000868
BIO1_001357
NCGC00015611-01
IDI1_033829
PRESTWICK2_000050
BSPBIO_000179
BSPBIO_003004
BSPBIO_001359
PRESTWICK3_000050
IDI1_000174
BPBIO1_000197
SPECTRUM5_001549
AB00053581
lidocainum [inn-latin]
alfa-dietilamino-2,6-dimetilacetanilide [italian]
alphacaine
xilocaina [italian]
einecs 205-302-8
lidocaina [inn-spanish]
hsdb 3350
lignocainum
nsc 40030
lidocaine (van)
dentipatch
brn 2215784
lidocaine
137-58-6
C07073
lidocaine, powder
lidocaine, analytical standard
MLS000758263
DB00281
2-diethylamino-n-(2,6-dimethyl-phenyl)-acetamide
xylocaine (tn)
dentipatch (tn)
lidocaine (jp17/usp/inn)
D00358
LOPAC0_000669
NCGC00022176-07
CHEBI:6456 ,
2-(diethylamino)-n-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)acetamide
NCGC00022176-06
alpha-diethylamino-2,6-dimethylacetanilide
lidoderm
n-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-n(2),n(2)-diethylglycinamide
smr000058189
MAYBRIDGE1_002571
KBIO2_004166
KBIO2_005215
KBIO2_000079
KBIO3_000158
KBIO2_006734
KBIOGR_000599
KBIOSS_000079
KBIO3_000157
KBIOSS_001598
KBIO2_002647
KBIOGR_000079
KBIO3_002224
KBIO2_001598
SPBIO_001525
PRESTWICK1_000050
SPECTRUM2_001343
SPECTRUM4_000070
NINDS_000174
PRESTWICK0_000050
SPECTRUM3_001392
SPBIO_002100
NCGC00015611-03
NCGC00022176-08
NCGC00022176-09
NCGC00022176-05
NCGC00015611-04
2-2etn-2mephacn
HMS2089E15
2-(diethylamino)-n-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)ethanamide
AC-10282
HMS1989D21
lqz ,
HMS2051C21
NCGC00015611-14
HMS548M19
lidocainum
CHEMBL79 ,
algrx-3268
algrx 3268
HMS1791D21
L0156
2-diethylamino-n-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)acetamide
2-(diethylamino)-2'',6''-acetoxylidide
bdbm50017662
AKOS001026768
NCGC00015611-10
A833036
2-(diethylamino)-n-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)acetamide hydrate hydrochloride
A18187
2-(diethylamino)-n-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-acetamide
n1-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-n2,n2-diethylglycinamide
alfa-dietilamino-2,6-dimetilacetanilide
lidocaine [usp:inn:ban:jan]
lidocaina
ela-max
versatis
jetocaine
remicaine
unii-98pi200987
4-12-00-02538 (beilstein handbook reference)
xilocaina
98pi200987 ,
ztilido
cuivasil
ztlido
STK552033
n-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-n~2~,n~2~-diethylglycinamide
MLS001423964
cas-137-58-6
tox21_110183
dtxsid1045166 ,
dtxcid9025166
dilocaine
HMS2235O14
CCG-100824
NCGC00015611-07
NCGC00015611-15
NCGC00015611-13
NCGC00015611-16
NCGC00015611-06
NCGC00015611-05
NCGC00015611-11
NCGC00015611-09
NCGC00015611-08
NCGC00015611-12
lidocaine [usp-rs]
oraqix component lidocaine
lidocaine [ep monograph]
rocephin kit component lidocaine
lidocaine [inci]
diethylamino-2,6-dimethylacetanilide
lidocaine [hsdb]
lidocainum [who-ip latin]
lidocaine [vandf]
lidocaine [jan]
lanabiotic component lidocaine
synera component lidocaine
lidocaine [who-dd]
lidocaine component of emla
emla component lidocaine
lidocaine [who-ip]
lidocaine [orange book]
91484-71-8
lidocaine component of synera
lidocaine [mi]
lidocaine [mart.]
lidocaine [green book]
lidocaine component of lanabiotic
lidocain component of fortacine
lidocaine component of oraqix
lidocaine [usp monograph]
lidocaine component of rocephin kit
lidocaine [inn]
2-diethylamino-2',6'-acetoxylidide
fortacin component lidocaine
EPITOPE ID:116205
S1357
numb
HMS3371J04
HY-B0185
CS-2070
NC00074
SCHEMBL15689
tox21_110183_1
NCGC00015611-18
AB00053581-27
W-108233
2-(diethylamino)-n-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)acetamide #
xyline
n-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-n2,n2-diethylglycinamide
xyloneural (salt/mix)
zingo (salt/mix)
diethylaminoacet-2,6-xylidide
lidothesin (salt/mix)
lidaform hc (salt/mix)
.alpha.-diethylamino-2,6-acetoxylidide
neosporin plus (salt/mix)
lidamantle hc (salt/mix)
HMS3428O07
OPERA_ID_385
AB00053581_30
AB00053581_29
mfcd00026733
Z55135799
SCHEMBL17967359
lidocaine, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
lidocaine, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
HMS3651G09
lidocaine, pharmaceutical secondary standard; certified reference material
lidocaine 1.0 mg/ml in methanol
lignocaine base
SBI-0050648.P004
lidocain
n~1~-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-n~2~,n~2~-diethylglycinamide
lidocaine, british pharmacopoeia (bp) reference standard
SW196598-4
lidocainehclh2o
lidocaine (alphacaine)
Q216935
AS-13718
BCP09081
AMY25560
BRD-K52662033-003-14-7
SB19118
SDCCGSBI-0050648.P005
NCGC00015611-31
qualigens
M06299
nsc789222
nsc-789222
SY052029
EN300-6472705
lidocaine (standard)
HY-B0185R
CS-0694840
4% lidocaine
zcaine fast acting anesthetic
aspercreme with lidocaine
aramark star burn gel
dynamo delayblack label
lidocaine anorectal
lidocaine 4% topical anesthetic cream
universal pain relief
elemar patch
lidocaine cream
paraaid burn relief gel
nupharmisto tattoo numbing cream
assured pain relief
kaisasa tattoo numbing
lidoflex shoulder
burn relief continuous
beaueli
planticin advanced topical pain relief
anecream 5
scalpanumb
harmony hemp neurocomfort pain relief roll-on 1000
lidocaine 3 percent
lidocaine numbing cream
burn relief extra strength
lidosol
desert harvest releveum
stag 9000 delayspray for men
burn relief professional
promescent
lidocaine pain relief
blue-emu lidocaine dry
burn reliefcvs
lidicaine
lidocaine hydrochlorideviscous
cbd pain cream
bengay
niravi 24 hours lidocaine 4 % patch
liquid sex
meijer lidocaine pain relief back and large areas
rugby pain relief patches
pain and itch relief4% lidocaine
alivio
lidoflex elbow
kroger pain relief lidocaine patch
astero
numb 520
aspercreme with lidocainexl
bed bug instant bite relief
lidaflex
endure male genital desensitizing
lidopure patch
satohap lidocaine 4% pain relieving pad
burn reliefleader
lidocaine (usp:inn:ban:jan)
anorectal
instant cool skininstant relief. sudden results
lidocaine 5% topical anorectal cream
tough love pain relieving
theracare pain relief lidocaine
thera care 24hrs lidocaine patch
painbloc24 flexi-stretch pain tape
s02da01
curist lidocaine relief
lidocaine 5% cream
doctor butlers numb it all cream
lidocare
curist hemorrhoid relief
amino rip muscle pain relief
caring mills relief patch with lidocaine
lidocaine hcl usp, 4%
lubricaine
lidocaine pain relief gel-patch
pain relieving lidocaine patch
flanax back pain relief
pain relief bodyaudacious wreck relief
asperflex
swiss navy endurance rx
simply vital hemorrhoid and anorectal relief
hempvana maximum strength pain relief topical anesthetic
pure cbd hydrogel xlwith lidocaine 4%
bengayginger citrus
dynamo delay
anorectalwalgreens
bengaytropical jasmine
pain free iv
numb master topical anesthetic
firstcare pain relief gel patch
nothing
australian goldaloe freeze gel with lidocaine
equaline lidocaine
lidocaine creme
greencaine blast
harmony hemp neurocomfort pain relief lotion500
meijer lidocaine pain relief patch assortment medium
burn relief extra strengthkool-down
cvs health xl lidocaine pain relief
base numb topical anorectal
dch numbing relief
maximum strength lidocaine patch
everyday medical everyday numb topical anesthetic cream
lipocaine 5
aloe burn relief
walgreens anorectal lidocaine cream
tattoo numbing cream
radx
dr sabharwals
c05ad01
theracare pain relieving patch with lidocaine
pantin
harmony hemp neurocomfort pain relief roll-on 500
solmateburn relief gel
blue tube
lansinoh pain relieving
lidoband
burn relief spray
good neighbor pharmacy burn reliefaloe extra
gerigentle frostyheat pain relief patch 4 lodocaine back
male genital desensitizer
lubricaine 5
maximum strength hemorrhoidal relief with finger cots
leader burn relief
lidocaine anesthetic cream
rite aid rectal care
base laboratories base numb extra strength topical anorectal
lidocaine 5% anorectal
gigi anesthetic numbing
r02ad02
re-lieved 4% lidocaine fabric tape
deeveeant numb
calm and correct serum with lidocaine
welmate lidocaine pain relieving patch
equate pain relieving patches
youcopia tattoo numbing
lidocain 5%
lidocaine (mart.)
lidocaine hl
lido rx
advanced seal barrier plus pain relief
salonpas pain relieving lidocaine 4% flex
s01ha07
base laboratories base numb topical anorectal cream
curist lidocaine
lidoflexelbow, single pouch
lidocaine, 0.5%
premier value pain relief patches
equate hemorrhoid relief
brazzers anal desensitizing
numb 100
anorectal lidocaine cream
lidovix l
lidocare arm, neck, leg
lidocane
lidocaine 0.50%
goodsense pain relief
equate sunburn relief with aloe after sun
harmony hemp neurocomfort pain relief gel 1000
lidocaine 4 percent plus
lidocream 10
bio-scriptives lidum hemorroidal (anorectal)
burn relief aloe vera gel
lidoflex single pouch, back
doctor butlers hemorrhoid and fissure
lidocaine 4% patch
inkeeze original b numb cylinder
meijer burn relief
plum smooth plumb numb gelee
anecream
toplast pain relief lidocaine 4percent
simplicity desensitizing
4 lidocaine topical anesthetic
lidocaine lotion
lidocaine 30%
lidocanna
lidocaine 5%
health mart lidocaine
franklynumb 2
sheffield lidocaine
lidocaine 0.5%
adellina tattoo numbing
lidocream 4
sunmed motion
aspercreme with lidocaine essential oils rosemary mint
will relieve
salonpas lidocaine pain relieving
lidocaine (usp monograph)
pain relief lidocaine
hempvana ultra strength pain relief cream
quality choice pain relief patches
first aid burn reliefrite aid
hemrid anorectal cream
numb plus maximum strength anorectal
lidocaine (ep monograph)
pro comfort 8 hours patch
instant burn relief aloe extracvs
cvs healthaftersun aloe vera cooling
curist lidocaine can
lidopac
instant burn relief
aspercreme with lidocaine dry
curist lidocainemaximum strength
topcare pain relief patches
simply numb endure
lidocream 5
meijer pain relief
albertsons pain relief patch
leader pain relief patches
natureplex lidocaine 4%
pain relief 4% lidocaine
aspercremelidocaine xl
healthy wise pain relief lidocaine patch
amazon basics pain relief patch with 4% lidocaine
medicated pain relief footcvs
recovery numb
ocean potion instant burn relief ice
hemaway
5% lidocaine
australian goldaloe gel with lidocaine
vonaflex
base laboratories lidocaine anesthetic pain relief
dermarad relief post radiation calming
lidocaina (inn-spanish)
kyduration for him
thera care pain therapy
zovacil 5
lidocaine-3.9%
topical anesthetic anorectal creamnumb and number
rectal care creamrevivol
tiger delayspray
lidocaine 5 percent
hemorrhoid pain relief
bottoms up
lidocaine 4% fabric tape
c01bb01
numb520
curist lidocaine patch
rectal care cream
proplex lidocaine
lidocaine-4%
assuredbikini smooth cream
oheal tattoo numbing cream
afassco burn gel
healthwise lidocaine pain relief
maximum strength pain relief lidocaine patch
discount drug mart pain relief patches
omeza lidocaine lavage
lmx5
premjact male desensitizerpound international
lidoxryl
moshe numbing hemorrhoidal
dr. richs numbing
diolpure lidocaine pain relief cream
numbed as fxxk
rectasmoothe
curist lidocaine patchmaximum strength
lidocaine pain relief gel patch
hempvana ultra strength pain relief
h2ocean nothing tattoo glide and soothing balm
dermalid
bio-groom lido-medveterinary strength
prolayed
aobbiy tattoo numbing cream
burn reliefsignature care
burn reliefrelief
lidocaine gel patch
harmony hemp neurocomfort pain relief gel 500
pain relieving burn gel
tatoo care
meijer lidocaine pain relief patch assortment small
coralite odor free pain relief
absorbine jr. lidocaine
gen7t
juanchi tattoo numbing
fruit of the earth sun town city aloe vera after sun with lidocaine hcl
bikini zone medicated creme
lidoflex single pouch, knee
meijer lidocaine pain relief patch assortment large
pain relief 4% lidocaine dry patch
formula 2 skin care
careone lidocaine pain relief
swiss navy endurancerx
manamed lidocaine 4% pain relieving gel patch
male genital desensitizerstud 100
lidoflex flex strip double
lidocain cream 5%
maxocaine topical anesthetic anorectal
dermacinrx phn pak
rectaease hemorrhoid relief cream
maximum strength pain reliever
walgreens pain relieving
cvs health lidocaine pain-relieving
lidocaine 4% gel patch
pain relief body
lidocaine 4% cream
kyduration for men
lidocaine spray
harmony hemp neurocomfort pain relief spray500
curist lidocaine numbing relief
rite aid lidocaine patch xlarge
lidocainum (inn-latin)
doctor butlers hemorrhoid and fissureexternal pain formula
lidocare03
lidoflex heel
gen 7t
n01bb02
dollar general pain relieving patch with lidocaine
microcaine topical analgesic
zensa
burn relief aloe vera gelgnp
lmx4
careland lidocaine 4 pain relieving gel-patches
lidocaine dry
tough seal hot spot plus pain relief
prolayed lidocaine male genital desensitizer
premium lidocaine 5% extra
frost lidocaine with aloe
aspercreme
hunter beach 4%
meijer pain relief patches
sole serum
lidocaine (usp-rs)
lmr plus
fruit of the earth aloe vera cool blue
kope pain relief gel
steady freddy
d04ab01
lido king
basic care lidocaine
maximum strength hemorrhoidal relief
sinsinpas lidocaine pain relieving
asperflex 24hrs
numb nuts
base laboratories hemorrhoidal
lidocaine patch 5%
lidocore
auebliss
anorectalequate
theracare maximum strength pain relief patch
treatonic tattoo numbing cream
hemorrhoid relief cream
lidocan
bio-scriptives lidum topical analgesic
mericaine
up and up lidocaine pain relief
burn relief pain relieverwell at walgreens
topicaine 5
walgreens 24-hour lidocaine patch
lidocaine pain relieving
medinumb
quick numb
inkeeze original b numb
medirelief
walgreens sunburn relief
stama pro
tylenol precise pain relieving
lidoflex
fast freeze lidocaine
lidocaine, 1mg/ml in methanol

Research Excerpts

Overview

Lidocaine is an anti-arrhythmic and local anesthetic drug, which also acts as a vasodilator at higher concentrations. It is often associated with discomfort during infiltration.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Lidocaine is a local anesthetic and antiarrhythmic drug widely used in clinics."( Acute myocardial infarction after a local anesthetic procedure in a middle-aged patient.
Chen, M; He, S; Li, G; Liu, J; Xiao, L; Zheng, Y, 2022
)
1.44
"Lidocaine injection is a common treatment for tendon injuries. "( Lidocaine Inhibited Tendon Cell Proliferation and Extracellular Matrix Production by Down Regulation of Cyclin A, CDK2, Type I and Type III Collagen Expression.
Chang, HN; Chen, JM; Chen, YC; Lin, LP; Pang, JS; Tsai, WC; Yu, TY, 2022
)
3.61
"Lidocaine is an amide local anaesthetic commonly used for pain control, however, few studies have investigated the effect of lidocaine on the osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells (HDPSCs). "( Lidocaine inhibits osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells
Choi, EJ; Kim, CH; Kim, EJ; Kim, HS; Kim, JY; Yoon, JU; Yoon, JY, 2023
)
3.8
"Lidocaine is a local anesthetic that is sometimes administered in combination with epinephrine. "( Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of lidocaine HCl 2% with epinephrine in horses following a palmar digital nerve block.
Arthur, RM; Blea, J; Katzman, S; Knych, HK; McKemie, DS, 2023
)
2.63
"Lidocaine is a common local anesthetic and antiarrhythmic drug that acts via the local anesthetic effect of blocking voltage-gated sodium channels in peripheral neurons. "( Effects of 1% Lidocaine Instillation on Overactive Bladder Induced by Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Rats.
Han, SW; Kang, HJ; Kim, JH; Kim, SW; Lee, YS, 2020
)
2.36
"Lidocaine (LID) is a local anesthetic that is administered either by injection and/or a topical/transdermal route. "( The Oral Administration of Lidocaine HCl Biodegradable Microspheres: Formulation and Optimization.
Alagili, MF; ALQuadeib, BT; Eltahir, EK, 2020
)
2.3
"Lidocaine is an anti-arrhythmic and local anesthetic drug, which also acts as a vasodilator at higher concentrations."( Efficacy of intra-arterial lidocaine infusion in the treatment of cerulein-induced acute pancreatitis.
Antkowiak, R; Antkowiak, Ł; Arent, Z; Domosławski, P; Grzegorczyn, S; Kabała, N; Nalik-Iwaniak, K; Stęplewska, K; Warmusz-Reichman, E, 2020
)
1.58
"Lidocaine is a well-established local anesthetic used prior to hip joint injections, but it is often associated with discomfort during infiltration."( Local Anesthesia Prior to Ultrasound-Guided Hip Joint Injections: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Bacteriostatic Saline versus Buffered Lidocaine.
Kindle, BJ; Kruse, RC; Presley, J; Sellon, JL; Smith, J; Wisniewski, S, 2021
)
1.54
"Lidocaine is a commonly used drug to alleviate neuropathic pain (NP). "( Lidocaine activates autophagy of astrocytes and ameliorates chronic constriction injury-induced neuropathic pain.
Fei, Y; Yuan, J, 2021
)
3.51
"Lidocaine is a nonselective inhibitor of voltage-gated sodium channels with potential antitussive effects, but randomized placebo-controlled studies evaluating its efficacy in RCC are lacking."( A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Effect of Lidocaine Administered via Throat Spray and Nebulization in Patients with Refractory Chronic Cough.
Abdulqawi, R; Dockry, R; Holt, K; Kanemitsu, Y; Khalid, S; Satia, I; Smith, JA; Woodcock, AA, 2021
)
1.59
"The lidocaine/MEGX test is a promising, rapid, and noninvasive blood test that seems helpful to differentiate dogs with closed EHPSS and dogs with persistent shunting after gradual attenuation."( Evaluation of serum lidocaine/monoethylglycylxylidide concentration to assess shunt closure in dogs with extrahepatic portosystemic shunts.
Croubels, S; de Rooster, H; Devriendt, N; Paepe, D; Serrano, G; Stock, E; Vandermeulen, E; von Luckner, J, 2021
)
1.5
"Lidocaine is a vasodilator commonly used in microvascular surgery."( Wire Myography for Continuous Estimation of the Optimal Concentration of Topical Lidocaine as a Vasodilator in Microsurgery.
Hashikawa, K; Kusumoto, J; Nomura, T; Ogawa, H; Sakakibara, S; Terashi, H, 2021
)
1.57
"Lidocaine is a common local anesthetic used during minor procedures performed on pediatric patients. "( Pediatric Toxidrome Simulation Curriculum: Lidocaine-Induced Methemoglobinemia.
Burns, R; Connelly, S; Davila, U; Hardy, N; Mazor, S; Pearce, J; Rosso, CD; Thomas, A, 2021
)
2.33
"Lidocaine is an amino amide with a well-established role as a local anesthetic agent. "( Lidocaine Infusions for Pain Management in Pediatrics.
Anghelescu, DL; Davis, MS; Hall, EA; Sauer, HE, 2021
)
3.51
"Lidocaine is a local anesthetic that wildly used in surgical treatment and postoperative medical care for lung cancers. "( Lidocaine inhibited migration of NSCLCA549 cells via the CXCR4 regulation.
Cui, Y; Xing, B; Yang, L, 2022
)
3.61
"Lidocaine spray is a good option for reducing the pain experienced during insertion of an IUD. "( Lidocaine for pain control during intrauterine device insertion.
Cömert, DK; Ergün, Y; Karadağ, B; Karasu, Y, 2017
)
3.34
"Lidocaine spray is an effective analgesic of mucous membranes. "( Lidocaine spray as a local analgesic for intravenous cannulation: a randomized clinical trial.
Bekhof, J; Datema, J; Veldhuis, J, 2019
)
3.4
"Lidocaine is a well-documented local anesthetic that has been reported to sensitize the cytotoxicity of cisplatin in cancer cells. "( Lidocaine sensitizes the cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouacil in melanoma cells
Huang, S; Liu, W; Wang, Y; Xie, J; Xing, Y; Zhang, R, 2017
)
3.34
"Lidocaine is an amide anesthetic that inhibits voltage gated sodium channels, and lidocaine metabolism occurs exclusively in the liver. "( The Use and Method of Action of Intravenous Lidocaine and Its Metabolite in Headache Disorders.
Berk, T; Silberstein, SD, 2018
)
2.18
"Lidocaine is a potential opioid-sparing analgesic that deserves further study for severe pain in ED patients."( Intravenous Lidocaine Provides Similar Analgesia to Intravenous Morphine for Undifferentiated Severe Pain in the Emergency Department: A Pilot, Unblinded Randomized Controlled Trial.
Clattenburg, EJ; Flores, S; Hailozian, C; Herring, AA; Louie, D; Nguyen, A; Yoo, T, 2019
)
1.61
"Lidocaine is an amide local anaesthetic initially used intravenously as an antiarrhythmic agent. "( Perioperative Use of Intravenous Lidocaine.
Beaussier, M; Delbos, A; Ecoffey, C; Maurice-Szamburski, A; Mercadal, L, 2018
)
2.2
"Lidocaine is a conventional local anesthetic which is shown antiproliferative of colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients. "( Lidocaine inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells by upregulating mir-520a-3p and targeting EGFR.
Qu, X; Shi, Q; Wang, D; Wang, X; Wu, G; Yang, L, 2018
)
3.37
"Lidocaine acts as a local anesthetic by blocking transmembrane sodium channel permeability, but also induces the synthesis of heat shock proteins and sensitizes cells to hyperthermia. "( Lidocaine-induced potentiation of thermal damage in skin and carcinoma cells.
Anderson, RR; Avram, MM; Chuang, GS; Le, MH; Purschke, M; Raff, AB; Thomas, CN, 2019
)
3.4
"Lidocaine (Lido) is a commonly used local anesthetic, which has been reported in various types of cells. "( Lidocaine alleviates cytotoxicity-resistance in lung cancer A549/DDP cells via down-regulation of miR-21.
Ma, C; Xu, H; Yang, Q; Zhang, Z, 2019
)
3.4
"Lidocaine is a well-documented local anesthetic that has been reported to suppress cancer development."( Lidocaine inhibits growth, migration and invasion of gastric carcinoma cells by up-regulation of miR-145.
Li, Z; Lou, A; Sui, H; Yang, J, 2019
)
2.68
"Lidocaine is a local anesthetic and anti‑arrhythmic drug, and has been reported to possess anti‑tumor properties."( Lidocaine inhibits the progression of retinoblastoma in vitro and in vivo by modulating the miR‑520a‑3p/EGFR axis.
Mu, X; Wang, L; Xia, W; Yu, D; Zhou, X, 2019
)
2.68
"Lidocaine is a fairly common, marketed prescription-based, local anaesthetic pharmaceutical, applied for relieving localised pain and lidocaine-loaded microneedles have been explored."( Potential of biodegradable microneedles as a transdermal delivery vehicle for lidocaine.
Das, DB; Nayak, A, 2013
)
1.34
"Lidocaine spray is an effective and practical alternative measure for reducing pain associated with electrical excision of the cervix during LEEP."( Lidocaine spray compared with submucosal injection for reducing pain during loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized controlled trial.
Charoenkwan, K; Vanichtantikul, A, 2013
)
3.28
"Lidocaine is a local anaesthetic that is sometimes used on the skin to treat neuropathic pain."( Topical lidocaine for neuropathic pain in adults.
Derry, S; Moore, RA; Quinlan, J; Wiffen, PJ, 2014
)
2.28
"Lidocaine infusion is a useful option to consider when other pain treatments have not been successful."( Intravenous lidocaine for cancer pain without electrocardiographic monitoring: a retrospective review.
Hawley, P; Peixoto, RD, 2015
)
1.52
"Lidocaine is a traditional local anesthetic that blocks sodium channels and has positive effects on ischemia-reperfusion injury."( Effects of lidocaine on random skin flap survival in rats.
Cai, L; Cao, B; Gao, W; Lin, D; Wang, L, 2015
)
1.53
"Lidocaine is an effective therapy for neonatal seizures; however, it is not widely used, presumably due to the risk of cardiac events."( Lidocaine-Associated Cardiac Events in Newborns with Seizures: Incidence, Symptoms and Contributing Factors.
de Vries, LS; Schalkwijk, S; Toet, MC; van den Broek, MP; van Rooij, LG; Weeke, LC, 2015
)
3.3
"Lidocaine is a topical anaesthetic drug used in dairy cows for laparotomy (caesarean section, abomasal displacement). "( Concentrations of dimethylaniline and other metabolites in milk and tissues of dairy cows treated with lidocaine.
Bulder, AS; Essers, M; Hoogenboom, RL; Mengelers, MJ; van Eijkeren, JC; van Vuuren, AM; van Wikselaar, PG; Zeilmaker, MJ; Zuidema, T, 2015
)
2.07
"Lidocaine is a local anesthetic and Class 1B antiarrhythmic, and magnesium is essential for ionic regulation and cellular bioenergetics."( Adenosine, lidocaine, and Mg2+ (ALM): From cardiac surgery to combat casualty care--Teaching old drugs new tricks.
Dobson, GP; Letson, HL, 2016
)
1.55
"Lidocaine is a short-acting local anesthetic, and intravenous lidocaine has been shown to have analgesic efficacy in surgical settings."( Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasm: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study.
Choi, JB; Jeong, HW; Kim, JE; Kim, SY; Koo, BN; Lee, BH, 2016
)
1.46
"Lidocaine Hydrochloride is an amide ester, which is widely used local anesthetic agent that is well tolerated but what is less known is the occurrence of systemic toxicity which manifests in the central nervous and cardiovascular systems. "( Local Anesthetics Systemic Toxicity.
Jayanthi, R; Monica, K; Nasser, K, 2016
)
1.88
"Lidocaine is a local anesthetic which has been used to protect spasm reaction during tracheal intubation and bronchoscopy. "( Relaxation of tracheal smooth muscle independent on functional epithelium cells induced by lidocaine, bupivacaine and isomers in rats.
Lautner, RQ; Sudo, RT; Zapata-Sudo, G, 2009
)
2.02
"Lidocaine is a local anesthetic that is known to suppress tinnitus via systemic or local application; however, this effect has only limited duration. "( Sustained delivery of lidocaine into the cochlea using poly lactic/glycolic acid microparticles.
Horie, RT; Ito, J; Nakagawa, T; Okamura, N; Sakamoto, T; Tabata, Y; Tachibana, M; Tomiyama, N, 2010
)
2.12
"Lidocaine is a local anaesthetic widely used in regional and epidural anaesthesia. "( Clonidine changes lidocaine free concentrations in rat myocardium without affecting heart function measured by echocardiography.
Kostopanagiotou, G; Kotsiou, A; Mourouzis, J; Saranteas, T; Tesseromatis, C; Tigka, E,
)
1.91
"Lidocaine toxicity is a potential complication related to using tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) as the exclusive form of pain management in surgical procedures."( Efficacy of tumescent local anesthesia with variable lidocaine concentration in 3430 consecutive cases of liposuction.
Habbema, L, 2010
)
2.05
"Lidocaine is a class I antiarrhytmic drug that blocks Na(+) channels and exists in both neutral and charged forms at a physiological pH. "( Exploring the role of pH in modulating the effects of lidocaine in virtual ischemic tissue.
Cardona, K; Ferrero, JM; Martínez, M; Moltó, G; Saiz, J; Starmer, F; Trénor, B, 2010
)
2.05
"Lidocaine is a local anesthetic frequently used to relieve the symptoms of trigeminal neuralgia."( Inhibitory effect of lidocaine on the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-dependent atpase from temporalis muscle.
Alonso, GL; Casadoumecq, AC; Sánchez, GA; Takara, D, 2010
)
1.4
"Lidocaine seems to be an alternative treatment for scleroderma considering that: a) the patient's having excessive collagen deposits in tissues affected by scleroderma; b) the patient's demonstrating increased activity of the enzyme prolyl hydroxylase, an essential enzyme for the biosynthesis of collagen; and c) lidocaine's reducing the activity of prolyl hydroxylase."( Lidocaine for systemic sclerosis: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.
Andrade, LE; Kayser, C; Riera, R; Souza, AW; Trevisani, VF; Yanagita, ET, 2011
)
2.53
"Lidocaine suppositories are an easy-to-use, self-applicable (by the patient) and cheap method of local analgesia, with acceptable results. "( Lidocaine suppository for transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study.
Goluza, E; Hudolin, T; Kastelan, Z; Murselovic, T; Peric, M; Sosic, H, 2011
)
3.25
"Lidocaine is a local anesthetic that has multiple pharmacological effects including antiarrhythmia, antinociception, and neuroprotection. "( Inhibition of acid sensing ion channel currents by lidocaine in cultured mouse cortical neurons.
Chu, X; Cottrell, JE; Li, M; Lin, J; Maysami, S; Si, H; Simon, RP; Xiong, Z, 2011
)
2.06
"Lidocaine is an amide local anesthetic and clonidine is an antihypertensive (α2-adrenergic agonist). "( The influence of clonidine co-administration on the extent of lidocaine protein binding to rat serum and tissues.
Kotsiou, A; Mourouzis, I; Saranteas, T; Tigka, E, 2011
)
2.05
"Lidocaine is a local anaesthetic that blocks sodium channels, but also inhibits several ligand-gated ion-channels. "( Multiple inhibitory actions of lidocaine on Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptors transplanted to Xenopus oocytes.
Alberola-Die, A; González-Ros, JM; Ivorra, I; Martinez-Pinna, J; Morales, A, 2011
)
2.1
"Lidocaine patches are a safe, effective adjunct for rib fracture pain."( Lidocaine patches reduce pain in trauma patients with rib fractures.
Mayberry, JC; Peck, EG; Schreiber, MA; Zink, KA, 2011
)
2.53
"Lidocaine 2% gel is an effective, safe and convenient alternative to injectable lidocaine 2% as local anaesthetic agent in incision and curettage for Chalazion in this study."( Comparison of topical lidocaine [2% gel] and injectable lidocaine [2% solution] for incision and curettage of chalazion in Ilorin, Nigeria.
Bolaji, BO; Mahmoud, AO; Osayande, OO, 2010
)
2.12
"Lidocaine is a common local anaesthetic drug that is used topically to relieve pain and also for minor surgery."( Effect of lidocaine phonophoresis on sensory blockade: pulsed or continuous mode of therapeutic ultrasound?
Abbasnia, K; Ebrahimi, S; Ghaffarinezhad, F; Kamali, F; Kooroshfard, N; Motealleh, A, 2012
)
1.5
"Lidocaine is a safe, inexpensive, effective strategy to improve quality of recovery after ambulatory surgery."( Systemic lidocaine to improve postoperative quality of recovery after ambulatory laparoscopic surgery.
De Oliveira, GS; Fitzgerald, P; Marcus, RJ; McCarthy, RJ; Streicher, LF, 2012
)
1.52
"Lidocaine is an antiarrythmicum used as an anticonvulsant for neonatal seizures, also during therapeutic hypothermia following (perinatal) asphyxia. "( Anticonvulsant treatment of asphyxiated newborns under hypothermia with lidocaine: efficacy, safety and dosing.
de Vries, LS; Egberts, AC; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, AD; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van den Broek, MP; van Straaten, HL, 2013
)
2.06
"Lidocaine is a commonly used local anaesthetic that, besides blocking voltage-dependent Na(+) channels, has multiple inhibitory effects on muscle-type nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptors (nAChRs). "( Lidocaine effects on acetylcholine-elicited currents from mouse superior cervical ganglion neurons.
Alberola-Die, A; Lamas, JA; Morales, A; Reboreda, A, 2013
)
3.28
"Lidocaine is an effective drug to perform fetocide with doses below the toxic dose for the mother."( The use of lidocaine for fetocide in late termination of pregnancy.
Bernard, JP; Fischer, C; Senat, MV; Ville, Y, 2003
)
2.15
"Lidocaine iontophoresis is a method of topical anesthesia in which lidocaine is driven into the skin under the influence of electric current."( Lidocaine iontophoresis for local anesthesia before shave biopsy.
Parkinson, TM; Zempsky, WT, 2003
)
3.2
"Lidocaine iontophoresis is a safe and effective method of administering topical anesthesia before shave biopsy in adult patients."( Lidocaine iontophoresis for local anesthesia before shave biopsy.
Parkinson, TM; Zempsky, WT, 2003
)
3.2
"Lidocaine iontophoresis is a method of topical anesthesia where lidocaine is driven into the skin under the influence of electric current."( Lidocaine iontophoresis for topical anesthesia before dermatologic procedures in children: a randomized controlled trial.
Parkinson, TM; Zempsky, WT,
)
2.3
"The lidocaine value is an effective index of hepatic function. "( Operative risk by the lidocaine test (MEGX) in resected patients for HCC on cirrhosis.
Cavallari, A; Cescon, M; Del Gaudio, M; Ercolani, G; Gardini, A; Grazi, GL; Principe, A; Ravaioli, M; Varotti, G,
)
1
"Lidocaine is an anaesthetic agent used worldwide in various clinical specialties. "( Evaluation of re-challenge in patients with suspected lidocaine allergy.
Amsler, E; Aractingi, S; Flahault, A; Mathelier-Fusade, P, 2004
)
2.01
"Lidocaine is a local anesthetic and antiarrhythmic agent. "( Lidocaine attenuates apoptosis in the ischemic penumbra and reduces infarct size after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats.
Capuano-Waters, C; Cottrell, JE; Kass, IS; Lei, B; Popp, S, 2004
)
3.21
"Lidocaine is a potent blocker not only of sodium channels, but also of ATP-sensitive potassium channels."( Effect of lidocaine on ischaemic preconditioning in isolated rat heart.
Barthel, H; Ebel, D; Müllenheim, J; Obal, D; Preckel, B; Schlack, W, 2004
)
1.45
"Lidocaine tape is a simple and convenient method of reducing pain during botulinum toxin injection. "( Lidocaine tape (Penles) reduces the pain of botulinum toxin injection for Meige syndrome.
Dogru, M; Onguchi, T; Ono, M; Takano, Y; Tsubota, K, 2004
)
3.21
"Lidocaine 5% gel is a safe but ineffective agent in the treatment of pain in HIV-associated DSP."( A randomized controlled trial of 5% lidocaine gel for HIV-associated distal symmetric polyneuropathy.
Carter, K; Estanislao, L; McArthur, J; Olney, R; Simpson, D, 2004
)
2.04
"Lidocaine 2% gel is a safe alternative to retrobulbar anaesthesia for Ahmed drainage implant surgery and avoids the significantly greater pain associated with the administration of retrobulbar anaesthesia. "( Comparison of lidocaine 2% gel versus retrobulbar anaesthesia for implantation of Ahmed glaucoma drainage.
Alonso, N; Benatar, J; Corcostegui, J; Muñoz-Negrete, FJ; Rebolleda, G, 2005
)
2.13
"Lidocaine iontophoresis is a useful, noninvasive local anesthesia for CO2 laser surgery of superficial skin lesions."( Lidocaine iontophoresis versus EMLA cream for CO2 laser treatment in seborrheic keratosis.
Phahonthep, R; Sindhuphak, W; Sriprajittichai, P, 2004
)
2.49
"Lidocaine is a local anesthetic possessing both lipophilic and hydrophilic properties. "( Cytometric analysis of lidocaine-induced cytotoxicity: a model experiment using rat thymocytes.
Horimoto, K; Kanada, A; Kanemaru, K; Kobayashi, M; Nishimura, Y; Oyama, Y; Tatsuishi, T; Ueno, SY; Yamaguchi, JY, 2006
)
2.09
"Lidocaine is a useful anticonvulsive agent; however, the response rate to lidocaine appears to be quite low, as less than half of the seizures were effectively controlled by lidocaine."( Intravenous lidocaine for status epilepticus during childhood.
Eto, Y; Hamano, S; Hayakawa, M; Minamitani, M; Sugiyama, N; Tanaka, M; Yamashita, S; Yoshinari, S, 2006
)
1.43
"Lidocaine is an effective drug for the treatment of neonatal convulsions not responding to traditional anticonvulsant therapy. "( Development of an optimal lidocaine infusion strategy for neonatal seizures.
de Vries, LS; Malingré, MM; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van Kesteren, C; Van Rooij, LG; Ververs, TF, 2006
)
2.08
"Lidocaine toxicity is a potential complication of this procedure."( Lidocaine-induced altered mental status and seizure after hematoma block.
Dorf, E; Holstege, CP; Kelsey, J; Kuntz, AF, 2006
)
2.5
"Lidocaine is a local anaesthetic with analgesic but no anti-inflammatory properties."( Lidocaine iontophoresis mediates analgesia in lateral epicondylalgia treatment.
Ferslew, KE; Kalbfleisch, JH; Panus, PC; Yarrobino, TE, 2006
)
2.5
"Lidocaine is an antiarrhythmic agent commonly used to treat ventricular tachycardia clinically."( Spiral wave attachment to millimeter-sized obstacles.
Aguel, F; Emokpae, R; Lim, ZY; Maskara, B; Tung, L, 2006
)
1.06
"Lidocaine is a use-dependent sodium channel blocker that produces analgesia when administered intravenously to patients with neuropathic pain. "( Intravenous lidocaine for neuropathic pain: diagnostic utility and therapeutic efficacy.
Carroll, I, 2007
)
2.16
"Lidocaine lollipop is a promising form of local oropharyngeal anesthesia for EGD. "( Lidocaine lollipop as single-agent anesthesia in upper GI endoscopy.
Abdul-Baki, H; Ayoub, C; Nasr, V; Skoury, A; Soweid, A, 2007
)
3.23
"Lidocaine is a commonly used local anaesthetic agent which has also been found to possess anti-inflammatory activity in several disorders. "( Lidocaine down-regulates nuclear factor-kappaB signalling and inhibits cytokine production and T cell proliferation.
Ben-Horin, S; Chowers, Y; Fudim, E; Horin, SB; Lahat, A; Lang, A; Picard, O, 2008
)
3.23
"Lidocaine is a widely used antiarrhythmic agent whose plasma clearance varies with changes in hepatic blood flow. "( The cimetidine-lidocaine interaction.
Karmen, A; Keren, G; Knapp, AB; Levitt, B; Maguire, W; Miura, DS; Somberg, JC, 1983
)
2.06
"Lidocaine is a widely used local anaesthetic reported to exert a biphasic effect on the microvasculature with contraction at low concentrations and relaxation at high concentrations."( Comparison of vascular effects of ropivacaine and lidocaine on isolated rings of human arteries.
Aberg, B; Gherardini, G; Jernbeck, J; Samuelson, U; Sjöstrand, N, 1995
)
1.27
"Lidocaine is a local anesthetic widely used in therapeutics and as antiarrhythmic agent."( Acid, basic and neutral soluble and membrane-bound aminopeptidase activities after lidocaine administration in discrete areas of the rat brain.
Casis, L; de Gandarias, JM; Echevarría, E; Fernández, D; Irazusta, J; Maza, JL, 1995
)
1.24
"Lidocaine is a Na+ channel blocker that is highly effective for the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but is largely ineffective against atrial arrhythmias. "( An analysis of lidocaine block of sodium current in isolated human atrial and ventricular myocytes.
Arentzen, CE; Backer, CL; Furukawa, T; Jia, H; Koumi, S; Sakakibara, Y; Singer, DH; Wasserstrom, JA, 1995
)
2.09
"Lidocaine is a sensitive substrate for evaluating liver P450 function. "( Pharmacokinetic analysis verifies P450 function during in vitro and in vivo application of a bioartificial liver.
Cerra, FB; Hu, WS; Mann, HJ; Nyberg, SL; Remmel, RP,
)
1.57
"Lidocaine is a widely used local anesthetic and antiarrhythmic drug that is believed to exert its clinically important action by blocking voltage-gated Na+ channels. "( Distinct local anesthetic affinities in Na+ channel subtypes.
Bennett, PB; George, AL; Nie, L; Wang, DW, 1996
)
1.74
"Lidocaine is a sodium channel blocker that also inhibits several neutrophil functions."( Reduction of myocardial infarct size in rabbits and inhibition of activation of rabbit and human neutrophils by lidocaine.
Atkinson, JB; Forman, MB; Holsinger, JP; Murray, JJ; Vitola, JV, 1997
)
1.23
"Lidocaine is a local anesthetic widely used in therapeutics and as antiarrhythmic agent. "( Effects of acute lidocaine administration on the rat prosencephalic enkephalinergic system.
Casis, L; de Gandarias, JM; Echevarria, E; Maza, JL; Serrano, R; Silio, M, 1998
)
2.08
"Lidocaine tape (Penles) is a 15 cm2 dressing tape based on 60% lidocaine used to anesthetize skin when an intravenous catheter is inserted."( [Lidocaine tape (Penles--a dressing tape based on 60% lidocaine--) reduces the pain of postherpetic neuralgia].
Ogawa, H; Tamakawa, S, 1998
)
1.93
"Lidocaine is a drug widely used to treat arrhythmias in patients with myocardial ischemia."( Effect of lidocaine on left ventricular pressure-volume curves during demand ischemia in pigs.
Glantz, SA; Solomon, SB; Tayama, M, 1998
)
1.42
"Lidocaine is a local anaesthetic agent that is widely used in equine medicine. "( Lidocaine in the horse: its pharmacological effects and their relationship to analytical findings.
Bass, S; Boyles, J; Carter, WG; Dirikolu, L; Harkins, JD; Karpiesiuk, W; Lehner, A; Mundy, GD; Rees, WA; Tobin, T; Woods, WE, 1998
)
3.19
"Lidocaine is an integral part of most wetting solutions used in liposuction. "( Lidocaine is not necessary in liposuction.
Perry, AW; Petti, C; Rankin, M, 1999
)
3.19
"Lidocaine (LID) is an aminoethylamide used in hepatology to perform the monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) test for the evaluation of liver function in patients with cirrhosis (CIR) or chronic hepatitis (CH). "( The monoethylglycinexylidide test does not impair psychometric performance in patients with chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis.
Botta, F; Fasoli, A; Giannini, E; Risso, D; Romagnoli, P; Testa, R, 2000
)
1.75
"Lidocaine is a local anesthetic drug that is widely used in equine medicine. "( Identification of lidocaine and its metabolites in post-administration equine urine by ELISA and MS/MS.
Boyles, J; Carter, WG; Dirikolu, L; Fisher, M; Harkins, JD; Karpiesiuk, W; Lehner, AF; Tobin, T; Woods, WE, 2000
)
2.08
"Lidocaine is a widely used local anesthetic agent. "( Lidocaine inhibits potassium efflux and hemolysis in erythrocytes during oxidative stress in vitro.
Freysz, M; Lahet, JJ; Lenfant, F; Rochette, L; Vergely, C; Volot, F, 2000
)
3.19
"Lidocaine is a highly sensitive indicator of hepatic dysfunction."( [Dynamic liver function study using the lidocaine test].
Průsa, R; Sídlová, K, 2000
)
1.3
"Lidocaine is a local anesthetic belonging to the amide group and has been administered intrathecally for over 40 years. "( [Neurotoxicity of intrathecal lidocaine].
Anadón Senac, P; Pavón, A,
)
1.86
"Lidocaine is a commonly used and efficacious antiarrhythmic agent whose pharmacokinetics after a rapid intravenous bolus injection have been extensively studied. "( Effect of the duration of infusion on the disposition of lidocaine in dogs.
Caillé, G; Gagné, J; LeLorier, J; Moisan, R, 1977
)
1.94
"Lidocaine is a drug that may be epileptogenic at high doses."( Role of lidocaine (lignocaine) in managing status epilepticus.
Berciano, J; Ciudad, J; Pascual, J, 1992
)
1.44
"Lidocaine is an effective antiarrhythmic and local anesthetic agent, and it has also been a useful tool for characterizing drug interactions with the Na channel. "( Two components of use-dependent block of sodium current by lidocaine in voltage clamped cardiac Purkinje cells.
Alpert, LA; Hanck, DA; Makielski, JC, 1991
)
1.97
"Lidocaine is a well-documented local anaesthetic often used for paracervical block (PCB) in pregnant women. "( The concentration of lidocaine in follicular fluid when used for paracervical block in a human IVF-ET programme.
Evers, H; Jakobsson, AH; Sandqvist, U; Sjöblom, P; Wikland, M, 1990
)
2.04
"Lidocaine is a commonly used antiarrhythmic drug that causes use-dependent blockade of sodium channels in vitro and reduces conduction velocity in vitro and in vivo. "( Use-dependent effects of lidocaine on conduction in canine myocardium: application of the modulated receptor hypothesis in vivo.
Davis, J; Hondeghem, LH; Katzung, B; Matsubara, T; Scheinman, MM, 1986
)
2.02
"Lidocaine seems to be an effective and safe drug in convulsive status epilepticus."( Intravenous lidocaine for status epilepticus.
Berciano, J; Pascual, J; Polo, JM; Sedano, MJ,
)
1.23
"Lidocaine hydrochloride is an amide-type local anesthetic, commonly used for facial plastic as well as other surgical procedures. "( Anaphylactic reaction to lidocaine.
Cave, RH; Kennedy, KS, 1986
)
2.02

Effects

Lidocaine has a strong penetration potential which blocks the visual pathway, particularly for late glaucoma eyes. The effect of lidocaine for desensitization of skin has shown variable results in humans. Lidocain has a proven anti-inflammatory activity in several tissues but its modulation of glycocalyx has not been investigated.

Lidocaine has been associated with respiratory depression, psychosis, methemoglobinemia, and toxic cardiovascular reactions. It has a complex voltage dependence caused by a higher affinity for the inactivated state over the resting state. Lido has been confirmed to exert an anti-tumor role in many human cancers.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Lidocaine block has a complex voltage dependence caused by a higher affinity for the inactivated state over the resting state."( Intrinsic lidocaine affinity for Na channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes depends on alpha (hH1 vs. rSkM1) and beta 1 subunits.
Fan, Z; Kyle, JW; Limberis, J; Makielski, JC, 1999
)
1.43
"Lidocaine has a shorter time lapse (1-3 min) when used on mucus membrane; however, the effect of lidocaine for desensitization of skin has shown variable results in humans."( Lidocaine spray 10% prior to intravenous catheterisation in dogs.
Haga, HA; Heggernes Softeland, M; Hoeberg, E; Lervik, A; Loken Kolstad, T; Moller, LM; Rosvold, SK, 2022
)
2.89
"Lidocaine has a proven anti-inflammatory activity in several tissues but its modulation of glycocalyx has not been investigated."( Glycocalyx Degradation after Pulmonary Transplantation Surgery.
Aymonnier, K; Casanova, J; Garutti, I; Muñoz, C; Rancan, L; Sánchez Pedrosa, G; Shahani, PM; Simón, C; Vara, E, 2018
)
1.2
"Lidocaine has a radioprotective effect on the capacity of muscarinic agonist-induced water secretion in irradiated salivary glands."( Radioprotective effect of lidocaine on neurotransmitter agonist-induced secretion in irradiated salivary glands.
Benedek, GA; Dendorfer, A; Hakim, SG; Klinger, M; Liao, GQ; Meller, B; Rades, D; Sieg, P; Su, YX, 2013
)
2.13
"Lidocaine has a moderate efficacy as second-line therapy following benzodiazepines for treating neonatal seizures and is not frequently associated with cardiovascular adverse effects. "( Efficacy and safety of lidocaine for treatment of neonatal seizures.
Ågren, J; Flink, R; Hellström-Westas, L; Lundqvist, M; Wickström, R, 2013
)
2.14
"Lidocaine has a biphasic action on smooth muscle of peripheral blood vessels, with vasoconstriction at low concentrations and vasodilation at higher concentrations. "( Effect of lidocaine on swine lingual and pulmonary arteries.
Joh, S; Kamada, S; Kuji, A; Kumagai, M; Sato, M; Satoh, K, 2015
)
2.26
"IV lidocaine has a multidimensional effect on the quality of recovery. "( Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.
Brady, RR; Fearon, KC; Foo, I; Kennedy, ED; Paterson, HM; Speake, D; Ventham, NT, 2015
)
1.35
"Lidocaine has a concentration-dependent effect on seizures. "( Lidocaine and seizures.
DeToledo, JC, 2000
)
3.19
"Lidocaine has a fast onset (10-15 min) and an intermediate duration of action (60-120 min), and is used for short diagnostic and surgical procedures."( Local and regional anesthesia.
Dawson, SD; Lemke, KA, 2000
)
1.03
"Lidocaine has a strong penetration potential which blocks the visual pathway, particularly for late glaucoma eyes in which the remnant optic nerve fibers may be especially sensitive to the drug."( [Temporary amaurosis from retrobulbar lidocaine injection in late glaucoma patients].
Mo, XJ, 1991
)
1.27
"Lidocaine has an intermediate position (161.4 +/- 2.6 min)."( [A comparative analysis of the efficacy of trimecaine, lidocaine and bupivacaine for a prolonged brachial plexus block].
Gnezdilov, AV; Kozlov, SP; Marupov, AM; Svetlov, VA,
)
1.1
"Lidocaine block has a complex voltage dependence caused by a higher affinity for the inactivated state over the resting state."( Intrinsic lidocaine affinity for Na channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes depends on alpha (hH1 vs. rSkM1) and beta 1 subunits.
Fan, Z; Kyle, JW; Limberis, J; Makielski, JC, 1999
)
1.43
"Lidocaine (Lido) has been confirmed to exert an anti-tumor role in many human cancers."( Lidocaine represses the malignant behavior of lung carcinoma cells via the circ_PDZD8/miR-516b-5p/GOLT1A axis.
Chen, L; Ruan, Q; Zi, H, 2022
)
2.89
"Lidocaine has previously been used in tox cases to shorten QT intervals."( Treatment of status epilepticus and prolonged QT after massive intentional bupropion overdose with lidocaine.
Robinson, S, 2022
)
1.66
"Lidocaine has been gradually used in general anesthesia. "( Effect of Systemic Lidocaine on Postoperative Early Recovery Quality in Patients Undergoing Supratentorial Tumor Resection.
Chen, X; Cui, X; Dong, Y; Ji, T; Li, W; Su, G; Wang, Y; Wu, N; Yang, Y; Zhao, K, 2022
)
2.49
"Lidocaine has a shorter time lapse (1-3 min) when used on mucus membrane; however, the effect of lidocaine for desensitization of skin has shown variable results in humans."( Lidocaine spray 10% prior to intravenous catheterisation in dogs.
Haga, HA; Heggernes Softeland, M; Hoeberg, E; Lervik, A; Loken Kolstad, T; Moller, LM; Rosvold, SK, 2022
)
2.89
"Lidocaine has been widely used as a short-acting local anesthetic agent to reduce the pain caused by needle insertion. "( Lidocaine-loaded dissolving microneedle for safe local anesthesia on oral mucosa for dental procedure.
Gong, S; Jang, M; Jung, H; Jung, UW; Kang, G; Lee, C; Lee, H; Lee, S; Min, HS; Ryu, HY; Song, YW; Yang, H, 2023
)
3.8
"Lidocaine has been used as a local anesthetic by injection. "( Interfacial interaction of anesthetic lidocaine and mesoporous silica nanoparticles in aqueous solutions and its release properties.
Fukayama, H; Ikoma, T; Sato, Y; Wakita, R, 2019
)
2.23
"Lidocaine has cardiovascular and neurologic toxicity, which is dose-dependent. "( Investigation of the Inhibitory Effect of Simvastatin on the Metabolism of Lidocaine Both in vitro and in vivo.
Huang, HL; Huang, WL; Lin, QM; Ou-Yang, QG; Wang, Y; Zeng, DL; Zhuang, XL, 2020
)
2.23
"Lidocaine has not been associated with cancer in humans despite 8 decades of therapeutic use. "( A weight of evidence assessment of the genotoxicity of 2,6-xylidine based on existing and new data, with relevance to safety of lidocaine exposure.
Johnson, GE; Kirkland, DJ; Sheil, ML; Streicker, MA, 2021
)
2.27
"Lidocaine patches have been shown to reduce postoperative pain after noncesarean surgeries."( Lidocaine patches for postcesarean pain control in obese women: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Adams, JH; Antony, KM; Chappell, RJ; Gnadt, SE; Hetzel, S; Jacques, L; Tevaarwerk, AJ, 2021
)
2.79
"Lidocaine has been manifested to exert anti-tumor role in gastric cancer (GC) progression. "( Lidocaine Suppresses Gastric Cancer Development Through Circ_ANO5/miR-21-5p/LIFR Axis.
Guan, E; Liu, H; Xu, N, 2022
)
3.61
"Lidocaine has been shown to inhibit the invasion and metastasis of breast cancer, but the mechanism still remains unclear. "( Lidocaine prevents breast cancer growth by targeting neuronatin to inhibit nerve fibers formation.
He, C; Li, B; Tu, Y; Xu, H; Zou, W, 2021
)
3.51
"Lidocaine has anti-inflammatory properties."( Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Inflammatory and Apoptotic Response of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Pigs Undergoing Lung Resection Surgery.
Carricondo, F; Cebollero, M; García-Aldao, U; Garutti, I; Martín-Albo, L; Ortega, J; Romera, A; Romero-Gómez, B; Simón, C; Vara, E; Zapatero, S, 2021
)
1.66
"Lidocaine has analgesics and anti-inflammatory properties, and poloxamer/alginate/CaCl2 (PACM) is a known antiadhesive agent."( Effects of a Lidocaine-Loaded Poloxamer/Alginate/CaCl2 Mixture on Postoperative Pain and Adhesion in a Rat Model of Incisional Pain.
Baek, CW; Cho, WJ; Choi, GJ; Hong, ME; Jung, YH; Kang, H; Kim, JW; Lee, Y; Park, ILK; Shin, HY, 2017
)
1.55
"Lidocaine has emerged as a useful adjuvant anesthetic agent for cases requiring intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs). "( A randomized crossover study of the effects of lidocaine on motor- and sensory-evoked potentials during spinal surgery.
Beathe, JC; Boachie-Adjei, O; Donegan, SW; Emerson, RG; Fields, K; Pinter, DW; Urban, MK, 2017
)
2.15
"One lidocaine metabolite has its own unique properties and may be an active form of the drug."( The Use and Method of Action of Intravenous Lidocaine and Its Metabolite in Headache Disorders.
Berk, T; Silberstein, SD, 2018
)
1.22
"Lidocaine has shown antiproliferative and cytotoxic activity on several cell types."( Effects of lidocaine and the inclusion complex with 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin on cell viability and proliferation of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Antunes, GBM; Burga-Sánchez, J; de Melo, NFS; Ferreira, LEN; Fraceto, LF; Groppo, FC; Muniz, BV; Volpato, MC, 2018
)
1.59
"Lidocaine has analgesic effect and antihyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory properties, which enable its use as a general anesthetic adjuvant. "( Intravenous lidocaine.
Estebe, JP, 2017
)
2.28
"Lidocaine probably has no clinically relevant effect on pain scores later than 24 hours."( Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery in adults.
Eberhart, LH; Hahnenkamp, K; Helf, A; Hollmann, MW; Jelting, Y; Kranke, P; Pace, NL; Poepping, DM; Schnabel, A; Weibel, S, 2018
)
1.48
"Lidocaine has been shown to be an effective anaesthetic diluent for some intramuscular injections, but has not been investigated with KM in the treatment of adult patients with MDR-TB."( Effect of lidocaine on kanamycin injection-site pain in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.
Chirehwa, MT; Court, RG; de Vries, N; Gumbo, T; Harding, J; Maartens, G; McIlleron, H; Stewart, A; Wiesner, L, 2018
)
1.6
"Lidocaine has a proven anti-inflammatory activity in several tissues but its modulation of glycocalyx has not been investigated."( Glycocalyx Degradation after Pulmonary Transplantation Surgery.
Aymonnier, K; Casanova, J; Garutti, I; Muñoz, C; Rancan, L; Sánchez Pedrosa, G; Shahani, PM; Simón, C; Vara, E, 2018
)
1.2
"Lidocaine has been shown to be clinically beneficial during bariatric surgery. "( Serum Concentrations of Lidocaine During Bariatric Surgery.
Bouffard, Y; Carabalona, JF; Citterio-Quentin, A; Delwarde, B; Duclos, A; Le Goff, MC; Moulsma, M; Rimmelé, T, 2020
)
2.31
"Lidocaine has been demonstrated to attenuate the impairment of cognition in aged rats induced by isoflurane in our previous study."( Lidocaine Attenuates Cognitive Impairment After Isoflurane Anesthesia by Reducing Mitochondrial Damage.
Guo, M; Huang, Z; Li, J; Lin, D; Xu, H; Yang, S; Yao, Y; Zhu, X, 2019
)
2.68
"Lidocaine has a radioprotective effect on the capacity of muscarinic agonist-induced water secretion in irradiated salivary glands."( Radioprotective effect of lidocaine on neurotransmitter agonist-induced secretion in irradiated salivary glands.
Benedek, GA; Dendorfer, A; Hakim, SG; Klinger, M; Liao, GQ; Meller, B; Rades, D; Sieg, P; Su, YX, 2013
)
2.13
"Lidocaine has a moderate efficacy as second-line therapy following benzodiazepines for treating neonatal seizures and is not frequently associated with cardiovascular adverse effects. "( Efficacy and safety of lidocaine for treatment of neonatal seizures.
Ågren, J; Flink, R; Hellström-Westas, L; Lundqvist, M; Wickström, R, 2013
)
2.14
"Lidocaine has been demonstrated to inhibit the Hoffmann (H) reflex to a greater extent than the direct motor (M) response induced by electrical stimulation, but the timecourse of these responses has not been investigated."( Time course of the soleus M response and H reflex after lidocaine tibial nerve block in the rat.
Buffenoir, K; Decq, P; Pérot, C, 2013
)
1.36
"Lidocaine has been reported to induce apoptosis on rabbit corneal endothelial cells. "( Cytotoxicity of lidocaine to human corneal endothelial cells in vitro.
Fan, TJ; Ge, Y; Li, YH; Wang, RX; Yu, HZ; Yu, MM; Zhao, J; Zhou, X, 2014
)
2.19
"Lidocaine has also demonstrated efficacy in relieving patient pain due to complex regional pain syndrome and may be useful in the treatment of patients with neuropathic pain who have cancer, although clinical trial results have not been consistent."( Topical therapies in the management of chronic pain.
Galluzzi, KE; Stanos, SP, 2013
)
1.11
"Lidocaine has been used as a local anesthetic with anti-inflammatory properties, but its effects on neuroinflammation have not been well defined. "( Lidocaine attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory responses in microglia.
Li, X; Li, Z; Wang, N; Yang, X; Yu, G; Yuan, T, 2014
)
3.29
"Lidocaine has been indicated to promote apoptosis and to promote endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. "( Endoplasmic reticulum stress is involved in the lidocaine-induced apoptosis in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells.
Han, X; Li, K, 2015
)
2.12
"Lidocaine has a biphasic action on smooth muscle of peripheral blood vessels, with vasoconstriction at low concentrations and vasodilation at higher concentrations. "( Effect of lidocaine on swine lingual and pulmonary arteries.
Joh, S; Kamada, S; Kuji, A; Kumagai, M; Sato, M; Satoh, K, 2015
)
2.26
"Lidocaine has been widely used to relieve acute pain and chronic refractory pain effectively by both systemic and local administration. "( Lidocaine preferentially inhibits the function of purinergic P2X7 receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes.
Horishita, T; Kawasaki, T; Minami, T; Okura, D; Sata, T; Sudo, Y; Ueno, S; Uezono, Y; Yanagihara, N, 2015
)
3.3
"Lidocaine has demonstrated properties that block the neuroinflammatory cycle associated with IC/BPS at many of the interactive points in this cycle."( Beyond a Simple Anesthetic Effect: Lidocaine in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/bladder Pain Syndrome.
Cahill, CM; Henry, RA; Morales, A, 2015
)
1.42
"IV lidocaine has a multidimensional effect on the quality of recovery. "( Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.
Brady, RR; Fearon, KC; Foo, I; Kennedy, ED; Paterson, HM; Speake, D; Ventham, NT, 2015
)
1.35
"Lidocaine has been recognized to induce neurotoxicity. "( GNB2 is a mediator of lidocaine-induced apoptosis in rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells.
Bi, X; She, Y; Tan, Y; Wang, Q; Zhao, B, 2016
)
2.19
"Lidocaine has proven anti-inflammatory activity in several tissues but its modulation of miRNAs has not been investigated."( Lidocaine Administration Controls MicroRNAs Alterations Observed After Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.
Calvo, A; Casanova, J; García, C; Garutti, I; Marchal-Duval, E; Paredes, SD; Rancan, L; Rincón, D; Simón, C; Turrero, A; Vara, E, 2016
)
2.6
"Lidocaine has been shown to have anti-inflammatory effects on certain cells (monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils etc.)."( Comparison of the efficacy of lidocaine and betamethasone dipropionate in carpal tunnel syndrome injection.
Aksoy, C; Aydin, T; Dernek, B; Diracoglu, D; Kesiktas, FN; Koseoglu, PK; Yesilyurt, T, 2017
)
1.47
"I.V. lidocaine has been used to ameliorate tinnitus, but in general its effect has been limited. "( I.V. ropivacaine compared with lidocaine for the treatment of tinnitus.
Havia, M; Kallio, H; Kentala, E; Neuvonen, PJ; Niskanen, ML; Rosenberg, PH, 2008
)
1.15
"Lidocaine patches have been used to provide local analgesia in dogs and cats. "( Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine following the application of 5% lidocaine patches to cats.
Abbo, LA; Ko, JC; Maxwell, LK; Weil, AB, 2008
)
2.11
"Lidocaine cytotoxicity has been reported in some cell types, which could affect its use as a local anesthetic in cell-based therapy. "( In vitro and in vivo effect of lidocaine on rat muscle-derived cells for treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
Chancellor, MB; de Miguel, F; Furuta, A; Honda, M; Jankowski, RJ; Kim, DK; Pruchnic, R; Yoshimura, N, 2009
)
2.08
"Lidocaine has been used for spinal anaesthesia since 1948, seemingly without causing concern until recently. "( Selective sensory spinal anaesthesia with hypobaric lidocaine for anorectal surgery.
Cordeiro, JA; Gouveia, MA; Imbelloni, LE; Vieira, EM, 2008
)
2.04
"Lidocaine has been shown to inhibit neural conduction and to have anti-inflammatory properties. "( Intraoperative infusion of lidocaine reduces postoperative fentanyl requirements in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Carli, F; Feldman, L; Fried, G; Kim, DJ; Lauwick, S; Michelagnoli, G; Mistraletti, G, 2008
)
2.09
"Lidocaine has been used in treatment of patients with refractory headache. "( Neuropsychiatric side-effects of lidocaine: examples from the treatment of headache and a review.
Gil-Gouveia, R; Goadsby, PJ, 2009
)
2.08
"Lidocaine has been demonstrated to exert antiinflammatory pleiotropic effects."( Lidocaine protects from myocardial damage due to ischemia and reperfusion in mice by its antiapoptotic effects.
Echtermeyer, F; Gillmann, HJ; Hahnenkamp, K; Harendza, T; Herzog, C; Hildebrand, R; Kaczmarek, DJ; Larmann, J; Osthaus, AW; Schmitz, M; Theilmeier, G; Werdehausen, R; Westermann, A; Wollert, KC, 2009
)
2.52
"Lidocaine has been used to reduce cardiovascular responses, coughing, and bucking induced by tracheal intubation."( Lidocaine given intravenously improves conditions for laryngeal mask airway insertion during propofol target-controlled infusion.
Baik, HJ; Kim, JH; Kim, YJ, 2009
)
2.52
"Lidocaine has been used as an injection or spray solution to protect spasm reaction during tracheal intubation and bronchoscopy. "( Effects of lidocaine on rat's isolated tracheal smooth muscle.
Chu, YH; Kao, CH; Wang, HW, 2010
)
2.19
"Lidocaine has been used to evaluate the role of mucosa-mediating pathways of esophageal reflexes in animal model, but its effects on esophageal secondary peristalsis are yet unclear in humans."( Effects of lidocaine on esophageal secondary peristalsis in humans.
Chen, CL; Liu, TT; Yi, CH, 2010
)
1.47
"lidocaine has been reported to decrease leucocyte and endothelial activation, and the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines."( Effect of intravenous lidocaine administration on laminar inflammation in the black walnut extract model of laminitis.
Belknap, JK; Faleiros, RR; Hubbell, JA; Lin, YJ; Loftus, JP; Peroni, JF; Ravis, WR; Williams, JM, 2010
)
1.4
"lidocaine 60 mg. There have been no reports of perioperative neurologic injury with the introduction of CP as a spinal anesthetic at our institution."( Chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia: a retrospective analysis.
Hejtmanek, MR; Pollock, JE, 2011
)
1.09
"Lidocaine has been proven to protect macrophages in mice with septic peritonitis by attenuating the production of cytokines."( The inhibitory effect of lidocaine on the release of high mobility group box 1 in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated macrophages.
Lei, WF; Wang, HL; Ye, T; Zhang, WH; Zhou, CQ, 2011
)
1.39
"Lidocaine has been demonstrated to exert cardioprotective effects against myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion injury. "( Impact of intravenous lidocaine on myocardial injury after off-pump coronary artery surgery.
Chin, JH; Choi, DK; Choi, IC; Chung, CH; Chung, HJ; Lee, EH; Lee, HM; Sim, JY, 2011
)
2.13
"Lidocaine has been shown to be an effective anticonvulsant for the treatment of neonatal seizures that persist in spite of first-line anticonvulsant therapy."( Lidocaine (lignocaine) dosing regimen based upon a population pharmacokinetic model for preterm and term neonates with seizures.
de Vries, LS; Egberts, TC; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, AD; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van den Broek, MP; van Hasselt, JG, 2011
)
2.53
"Lidocaine has been shown to attenuate ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in the heart, lung, and brain, potentially due to modulation of inflammatory responses and apoptotic signaling pathways. "( Systemic lidocaine does not attenuate hepatic dysfunction after liver surgery in rats.
de Graaf, W; Diepenhorst, GM; Erdogan, D; Herroeder, S; Hollmann, MW; van Gulik, TM, 2012
)
2.24
"Lidocaine has been shown to protect erythrocytes from oxidative stress by a possible membrane effect."( The protective effects of lidocaine on human erythrocytes stored for seven days at 04 degrees C.
Chaillot, B; Freysz, M; Lahet, JJ; Lenfant, F, 2004
)
1.34
"Lidocaine has been used in neonates as an effective drug in controlling neonatal seizures not responding to traditional anticonvulsant therapy. "( Cardiac arrhythmias in neonates receiving lidocaine as anticonvulsive treatment.
de Vries, LS; Groenendaal, F; Rademaker, KM; Toet, MC; van Rooij, LG, 2004
)
2.03
"Lidocaine has actions potentially of benefit during ischaemia-reperfusion. "( The effect of lidocaine on neutrophil CD11b/CD18 and endothelial ICAM-1 expression and IL-1beta concentrations induced by hypoxia-reoxygenation.
Harmon, D; Lan, W; Redmond, P; Shorten, G; Wang, JH, 2004
)
2.13
"Lidocaine has been used for spinal anesthesia since 1948, seemingly without causing concern. "( Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anesthetics: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials.
Christiansen, C; Pace, NL; Punjasawadwong, Y; Zaric, D, 2005
)
2.01
"Lidocaine has been reported to inhibit nitric oxide (NO) production in activated murine macrophages, but the role of inducible NO synthase (iNOS) in lidocaine-induced inhibition of NO has not been explored. "( Lidocaine inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase and cationic amino acid transporter-2 transcription in activated murine macrophages may involve voltage-sensitive Na+ channel.
Huang, CJ; Huang, YH; Kai, YF; Tsai, PS; Yang, CH, 2006
)
3.22
"Lidocaine has been reported to attenuate the inflammatory response in addition to its anesthetic activity, but the mechanisms are poorly understood. "( Lidocaine attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury through inhibiting NF-kappaB activation.
Feng, G; Liu, GJ; Liu, S; Wang, GL, 2008
)
3.23
"Lidocaine, however, has the potential to cause methemoglobinemia."( Postoperative methemoglobinemia following infiltrative lidocaine administration for combined anesthesia in pediatric craniofacial surgery.
Christophis, P; Heckmann, M; Howaldt, HP; Mann, V; Neuhaeuser, C; Schaaf, H; Weigand, N, 2008
)
1.31
"5% Lidocaine patches have been used for treatment of chronic neuropathic pain in adults and we have found this to be effective in management of localized neuropathic pain in children and adolescents."( Lidocaine 5% patch for localized chronic neuropathic pain in adolescents: report of five cases.
Cunliffe, M; Nayak, S, 2008
)
2.3
"Lidocaine and marcaine have been discovered to produce different effects: lidocaine produced a dose-dependent selective inhibition of C-components of reflex discharges, whereas marcaine a more prolonged and uniform suppression of both A- and C-components of evoked responses, inhibiting both excitatory and inhibitory components of reflex responses."( [Analysis of the mechanisms of the anti-arrhythmic action of marcaine and lidocaine].
Berdiaev, SIu; Darinskiĭ, NV; Dzhaparidze, MM; Kaverina, NV,
)
1.08
"Lidocaine has been given at the dosage of 2 mg/kg as an i.v."( [Electrophysiological effects of lidocaine on the QRS and ST segment during acute myocardial infarct. Evaluation with thoracic electromaps].
Bonatti, V; Botti, G; Favaro, L; Rolli, A; Villani, GQ, 1982
)
1.27
"Lidocaine aerosols have been ineffective at preventing airway constriction provoked by non-reflex stimuli. "( Comparison of local anesthetics as bronchodilator aerosols.
Downes, H; Hirshman, CA; Leon, DA, 1983
)
1.71
"Lidocaine has been shown to protect ischemic myocardium, but the degree of its effectiveness is not yet well established. "( Effects of lidocaine and droxicainide on myocardial necrosis: a comparative study.
Cheung, WM; Faria, DB; Maroko, PR; Ribeiro, LG, 1983
)
2.1
"Lidocaine in vitro has been reported not to inhibit phytohaemagglutinin (PHA)-induced lymphocyte responses at clinically applicable concentrations. "( Failure of lidocaine in vivo to inhibit mitogen-induced lymphocyte transformation.
Jalonen, J; Kanto, J; Salo, M, 1980
)
2.09
"Lidocaine pretreatment has recently been shown to attenuate endotoxin-induced lung injury in rabbits."( Does early posttreatment with lidocaine attenuate endotoxin-induced acute injury in rabbits?
Maekawa, N; Mikawa, K; Nishina, K; Obara, H; Takao, Y, 1995
)
1.3
"Lidocaine has been promulgated as first-line therapy in patients with VT, but studies evaluating its efficacy in the electrophysiology laboratory suggest that it has poor effects in terminating or preventing induction of VT."( Evaluation of intravenous lidocaine for the termination of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease with or without healed myocardial infarction.
Doyle, TK; Nasir, N; Pacifico, A; Taylor, A, 1994
)
1.31
"Lidocaine has been widely investigated as a local anaesthetic and cardiac antiarrhythmic agent. "( [The concentration of local anesthetics in the dental alveolus. Comparative studies of lidocaine and articaine in the mandible and maxilla].
Feller, K; Gramatté, T; Oertel, A; Oertel, R; Weile, K, 1994
)
1.95
"Lidocaine has been shown to inhibit function of these cells and stabilize cell membranes."( Effect of lidocaine pretreatment on endotoxin-induced lung injury in rabbits.
Maekawa, N; Mikawa, K; Nishina, K; Obara, H; Takao, Y; Yaku, H, 1994
)
1.41
"1. Lidocaine has been extensively investigated as a potential neuroprotective drug against ischemia-induced neurodegeneration without reaching any satisfactory conclusion. "( Lidocaine reduces the hypoxia-induced release of an excitatory amino acid analog from rat striatal slices in superfusion.
Bustos, G; Díaz, L; Gómez, A, 1995
)
2.36
"Lidocaine has been shown to inhibit neutrophil function."( Lidocaine attenuates hyperoxic lung injury in rabbits.
Maekawa, N; Mikawa, K; Nishina, K; Obara, H; Takao, Y, 1996
)
2.46
"Lidocaine has been shown to accumulate in the lung following its administration. "( Lung uptake of lidocaine during hyperoxia and hypoxia in the dog.
Fujimori, M; Hasegawa, K; Hayashi, M; Tatekawa, S; Yukioka, H, 1996
)
2.09
"Lidocaine has been shown to reduce the injury."( Inhibitory effect of local anaesthetics on reactive oxygen species production by human neutrophils.
Akamatsu, H; Maekawa, N; Mikawa, K; Nishina, K; Niwa, Y; Obara, H; Shiga, M, 1997
)
1.02
"Lidocaine has been shown to have direct vasoconstrictive effects at low concentrations. "( Lidocaine-induced hemodynamic effects are enhanced by the inhibition of endothelium-derived relaxing factor in dogs.
Fujimori, M; Hayashi, M; Tatekawa, S; Toyoyama, H; Yukioka, H, 1997
)
3.18
"Lidocaine has been used as the primary antiarrhythmic agent for ventricular arrhythmias during acute myocardial infarction (MI) and open heart surgery. "( Does lidocaine protect the heart during coronary revascularisation?
Kaukinen, S; Rinne, T, 1998
)
2.26
"Lidocaine has been reported to cause neural tube closure defects in vitro in mice at clinically relevant concentrations. "( Assessment of teratogenic effects of lidocaine in rat embryos cultured in vitro.
Fujinaga, M, 1998
)
2.02
"Lidocaine has antibacterial properties at high concentrations, but low concentrations of lidocaine (0.1%) have not been studied."( The effect of lidocaine on bacterial growth in propofol.
Peterson, LR; Vidovich, MI; Wong, HY, 1999
)
1.39
"Lidocaine has been recently approved for use as an intranasal spray in the treatment of migraine. "( Characterization of lidocaine metabolism by rat nasal microsomes: implications for nasal drug delivery.
Desai, PB; Deshpande, VS; Genter, MB; Jung, C,
)
1.9
"Lidocaine has few of the proarrhythmic concerns of most antiarrhythmic drugs and, at high bolus doses, prolongs the atrial refractory period well enough to be effective in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm."( High-dose bolus lidocaine for chemical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind crossover trial.
Bardy, GH; Marrouche, NF; Reddy, RK; Wittkowsky, AK, 2000
)
1.37
"Lidocaine has a concentration-dependent effect on seizures. "( Lidocaine and seizures.
DeToledo, JC, 2000
)
3.19
"Lidocaine has a fast onset (10-15 min) and an intermediate duration of action (60-120 min), and is used for short diagnostic and surgical procedures."( Local and regional anesthesia.
Dawson, SD; Lemke, KA, 2000
)
1.03
"Lidocaine has been demonstrated to modify both contraction and relaxation of the vascular smooth muscle. "( Effects of lidocaine on rabbit isolated thoracic aorta.
Celebi, H; Demiryürek, AT; Turan, NN, 2000
)
2.14
"Lidocaine has immunoregulatory effects on T cells. "( Inhibitory effect of lidocaine on T cells from patients with allergic asthma.
Adachi, M; Matsuo, H; Minoguchi, K; Oda, N; Okada, S; Tanaka, A; Tasaki, T; Yokoe, T, 2002
)
2.08
"Lidocaine has been the initial antiarrhythmic drug treatment recommended for patients with ventricular fibrillation that is resistant to conversion by defibrillator shocks. "( Amiodarone as compared with lidocaine for shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation.
Barr, A; Cass, D; Cooper, R; Dorian, P; Gelaznikas, R; Schwartz, B, 2002
)
2.05
"Lidocaine has a strong penetration potential which blocks the visual pathway, particularly for late glaucoma eyes in which the remnant optic nerve fibers may be especially sensitive to the drug."( [Temporary amaurosis from retrobulbar lidocaine injection in late glaucoma patients].
Mo, XJ, 1991
)
1.27
"Lidocaine has an intermediate position (161.4 +/- 2.6 min)."( [A comparative analysis of the efficacy of trimecaine, lidocaine and bupivacaine for a prolonged brachial plexus block].
Gnezdilov, AV; Kozlov, SP; Marupov, AM; Svetlov, VA,
)
1.1
"Lidocaine has been shown to have adverse effects on mouse oocyte fertilization and embryo development. "( Follicular fluid Lidocaine levels during transvaginal oocyte retrieval.
Bailey-Pridham, DD; Cook, CL; Drury, K; Hurst, HE; Reshef, E; Yussman, MA, 1990
)
2.06
"Lidocaine toxicity has been associated with fetal distress secondary to fetal ion trapping in the presence of acidosis."( Lidocaine toxicity after maternal pudendal anesthesia in a term infant with fetal distress.
Bozynski, ME; Patel, JA; Rubarth, LB, 1987
)
2.44
"Lidocaine has been used in obstetrical anaesthesia for many years but there are still concerns about possible adverse affects of this drug on the foetus in utero. "( The effect of lidocaine on regional blood flows and cardiac output in the non-stressed and the stressed foetal lamb.
Bachman, C; Biehl, D; Friesen, C; Meatheral, R; Yarnell, R, 1986
)
2.07
"Lidocaine has also been associated with respiratory depression, psychosis, methemoglobinemia, and toxic cardiovascular reactions."( Cardiopulmonary arrest due to misuse of viscous lidocaine.
Ow, EP; Puczynski, MS; Rust, C, 1985
)
1.25

Actions

Lidocaine may inhibit the activity of breast cancer cells by inhibiting the expression of VDAC1. The lidocaine group had a lower pain intensity than the saline group for up to 1 h, with no differences in IL-6 and time to extubation.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Lidocaine may inhibit the activity of breast cancer cells by inhibiting the expression of VDAC1, increasing the apoptosis in breast cancer cells."( Lidocaine promotes apoptosis in breast cancer cells by affecting VDAC1 expression.
Cheng, L; Fang, X; Li, H; Long, D; Qu, L; Yuan, P, 2022
)
3.61
"Lidocaine can inhibit the enhanced glycolysis and glycolytic capacity induced by LPS in the macrophages."( Lidocaine attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory responses and protects against endotoxemia in mice by suppressing HIF1α-induced glycolysis.
Bian, J; Jiang, Z; Jin, P; Lin, S; Lu, W; Shao, C; Xiang, Q; Zhang, Y, 2020
)
2.72
"The lidocaine group had a lower pain intensity than the saline group for up to 1 h, with no differences between groups in IL-6 and time to extubation. "( Assessment of the Effect of Perioperative Venous Lidocaine on the Intensity of Pain and IL-6 Concentration After Laparoscopic Gastroplasty.
Brunialti, MKC; Coelho, LMG; da Cunha Leal, P; da Silva, AAM; de Lima, RC; de Oliveira, CMB; Moura, ECR; Sakata, RK; Salomão, R; Valadão, JA, 2020
)
1.37
"Lidocaine plays an anticancer role in hepatocellular carcinoma. "( Lidocaine Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development by Modulating circ_ITCH/miR-421/CPEB3 Axis.
Chen, F; Li, J; Liu, G; Ma, N; Mao, N; Zhao, L, 2021
)
3.51
"1% lidocaine with EPI plays a similar role in clinical outcomes for inferior alveolar nerve, lingual nerve and buccal nerve block as 2% lidocaine with EPI, which produces lower pain on injection as well as a relatively short time to sensation return. "( [Different concentration of lidocaine used for an exodontia of the impacted mandibular third molar].
Chang, QK; Chu, DQ; Gao, C; Hao, XH; Shen, ML; Ye, H; Zhao, J, 2020
)
1.47
"Lidocaine is known to inhibit the hyperpolarization-activated mixed cation current (I"( Cation and voltage dependence of lidocaine inhibition of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated HCN1 channel.
Accili, EA; Putrenko, I; Schwarz, SKW; Yip, R, 2017
)
2.18
"Lidocaine produced lower VPS scores during tenaculum placement (MD -0.99, 95% CI: -1.73 to -0.26), IUD insertion (MD -1.26, 95% CI: -2.23 to -0.29) and immediate post-IUD insertion period (MD -1.25, 95% CI: -2.17 to -0.33)."( Uterine or paracervical lidocaine application for pain control during intrauterine contraceptive device insertion: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Hernandez, AV; Martinez-Dominguez, SJ; Perez-Lopez, FR; Perez-Roncero, GR, 2018
)
1.51
"Lidocaine displays antitumor activity by inducing apoptosis and suppressing tumor growth in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells in vitro. "( Effects of Lidocaine-Mediated CPEB3 Upregulation in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Proliferation In Vitro.
Chen, B; Li, W; Liu, H; Shen, X; Wang, Y, 2018
)
2.31
"lidocaine, inhibit metastasis by multiple mechanisms and recent in vivo data support this."( Effect of Perioperative Lidocaine and Cisplatin on Metastasis in a Murine Model of Breast Cancer Surgery.
Buggy, DJ; Crowley, PD; Foley, AG; Freeman, J; Gallagher, HC; Iwasaki, M; Ma, D, 2018
)
1.51
"Lidocaine clearance was lower than reported in young healthy subjects."( Rectus sheath single-injection blocks: a study to quantify local anaesthetic absorption using serial ultrasound measurements and lidocaine serum concentrations.
Al Nebaihi, H; Brocks, DR; Dillane, D; Fairey, A; Green, JS; Primrose, M; Tsui, B; Widder, S, 2019
)
1.44
"Lidocaine could cause significant ASC apoptosis."( Lidocaine-induced ASC apoptosis (tumescent vs. local anesthesia).
Baynosa, RC; Fang, XH; Khiabani, KT; Stephenson, LL; Wang, WZ; Williams, SJ; Zamboni, WA, 2014
)
2.57
"The lidocaine group had lower serum MDA levels than those in the control group."( Neuroprotective effects of intravenous lidocaine on early postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients following spine surgery.
Chen, K; Li, J; Wei, P; Zheng, Q; Zhou, J, 2015
)
1.17
"Lidocaine can cause direct ASM relaxation by decreasing [Ca(2+)]i."( Effect of lidocaine on endothelin-1-mediated airway smooth muscle contraction in the rat trachea.
Akhtar, S; Brull, SJ; Harrison, BA; Podgoreanu, M, 2008
)
1.47
"Lidocaine caused an increase in the frequency of MEPP, being followed by blockade; racemic bupivacaine produced decrease being followed by blockade."( The influence of lidocaine and racemic bupivacaine on neuromuscular blockade produced by rocuronium. A study in rat phrenic nerve-diaphragm preparation.
Braga, Ade F; Braga, FS; Carvalho, VH; de Araújo, DR; Loyola, YC; Mantovani, M,
)
1.19
"IV lidocaine did not produce significant changes in spontaneous and evoked pain intensity measurements compared to pretreatment values."( Lumbar sympathetic blockade in children with complex regional pain syndromes: a double blind placebo-controlled crossover trial.
Berde, CB; Meier, PM; Sethna, NF; Zurakowski, D, 2009
)
0.87
"Lidocaine inhibited the increase in MDA level associated with IR injury while showing no influence over increases in number of neutrophils and tissue MPO level, and it elevated the flap survival rate."( The impact of lidocaine on flap survival following reperfusion injury.
Canoz, O; Eskitascioglu, T; Gunay, GK; Karaci, S; Kılıc, E, 2011
)
2.17
"Lidocaine resulted in lower morphine consumption at 2 h [4.9 + or - 2.3 vs."( Lidocaine vs. magnesium: effect on analgesia after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Abd El Latif, AA; Abd-Elmaksoud, AM; Kaki, AM; Saadawy, IM; Tolba, OM, 2010
)
2.52
"lidocaine does not inhibit inflammatory events in either the laminae or skin in the horse administered black walnut extract."( Effect of intravenous lidocaine administration on laminar inflammation in the black walnut extract model of laminitis.
Belknap, JK; Faleiros, RR; Hubbell, JA; Lin, YJ; Loftus, JP; Peroni, JF; Ravis, WR; Williams, JM, 2010
)
1.4
"Lidocaine can obviously inhibit the priming of resting neutrophilic granulocytes, which, simplified, may reduce the liberation of superoxide anions, a common pathway of inflammation after multiple forms of tissue trauma."( [Intravenous administration of lidocaine for perioperative analgesia. Review and recommendations for practical usage].
Eggert, K; Gottschalk, A; Herminghaus, A; Wachowiak, M; Wilhelm, W, 2011
)
1.38
"Lidocaine is known to increase the defibrillation threshold (DFT) of monophasic shocks (MS) and have no effect on DFT of biphasic shocks (BS). "( Effects of lidocaine on shock-induced vulnerability.
Efimov, IR; Li, L; Nikolski, V, 2003
)
2.15
"Lidocaine at lower infusion rates was no better than placebo in relieving pain."( A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled pilot trial of extended IV lidocaine infusion for relief of ongoing neuropathic pain.
Backonja, MM; Hutson, PR; Tremont-Lukats, IW,
)
1.08
"Lidocaine can directly inhibit the apoptosis and necrosis induced by LPS in cultured AT-II cells."( [Protective effect of lidocaine on injury alveolar Type II cells induced by LPS in adult rats].
Chen, SX; Ming, GF; Wu, XY; Xu, DM, 2006
)
2.09
"Lidocaine was used to inactivate the hippocampus."( Amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion in rats: Hippocampal modulation of the nucleus accumbens.
Whitaker, C; White, IM; White, W, 2006
)
1.06
"Lidocaine showed an increase in apoptosis at concentrations of 75 microM and above."( Novel tissue engineered tubular heart tissue for in vitro pharmaceutical toxicity testing.
Comer, GR; Franchini, JL; Propst, JT; Yost, MJ, 2007
)
1.06
"Lidocaine was found to cause an effective and long-lasting partial blockade of the cardiovascular reflex responses to stimulation of the ventricular receptors."( Studies on the endoanesthetic effects of lidocaine and benzonatate on non-medullated nerve endings in the left ventricle.
Oberg, B; Thorén, P, 1981
)
1.25
"Lidocaine was shown to inhibit selectively the digestion of immune complexes and immunoglobulin aggregates by macrophages whereas it had little effect on the binding or ingestion steps."( The effect of lidocaine on the processing of soluble immune aggregates and immune complexes by peritoneal macrophages.
Daha, MR; Hijlstra, A; Leslie, GQ; Van Dorp, W, 1980
)
1.34
"Lidocaine did not cause MHb or SHb formation above baseline in any monkey."( Topical anesthetic-induced methemoglobinemia and sulfhemoglobinemia in macaques: a comparison of benzocaine and lidocaine.
Baskin, SI; Gold, MB; Martin, DG; Watson, CE; Woodard, CL,
)
1.06
"lidocaine). Mean increase in VFT from baseline during infusion of the combination was 52.0 +/- 22.0 mA (p < 0.05 as compared with baseline and with esmolol or lidocaine alone)."( Antifibrillatory effect of esmolol alone and in combination with lidocaine.
Chow, MS; Colucci, RD; Fan, CD; Kluger, J; Sun, H; Tisdale, JE; Zhao, H, 1996
)
1.25
"Lidocaine caused an increase in all CPTs at the umbilicus and the knee reaching a statistical significance at 5 Hz for the umbilicus only."( Quantitative assessment of differential sensory blockade after lumbar epidural lidocaine.
Irving, G; Tay, B; Wallace, MS, 1997
)
1.25
"lidocaine, does not suppress CSNA during either normal or high CSNA under halothane anesthesia although i.v."( Bupivacaine does not suppress cardiac sympathetic nerve activity during halothane anesthesia in the cat.
Asada, A; Morimoto, O; Nishikawa, K; Terai, T; Yukioka, H, 1997
)
1.02
"The lidocaine-induced increase in current magnitude at negative potentials and the hyperpolarizing shift in the steady-state activation curve of alpha-brain, are novel effects and suggest that lidocaine treatment does not always lead to current reduction/block when it interacts with Na+ channels."( Lidocaine stabilizes the open state of CNS voltage-dependent sodium channels.
Castañeda-Castellanos, DR; Kallen, RG; Nikonorov, I; Recio-Pinto, E, 2002
)
2.24
"Both lidocaine and anoxia inhibit rapid axonal transport. "( Lidocaine effects on brain mitochondrial metabolism in vitro.
Fink, BR; Haschke, RH, 1975
)
2.21
"Lidocaine did not inhibit afterdepolarizations or triggered activity."( Triggered activity induced by K(+)-free, Na(+)-deficient solution in guinea pig ventricular muscle: the effects of ouabain, lidocaine, and Ca2+ channel blockers.
Aronson, RS; Gilat, E; Nordin, C, 1990
)
1.21
"Lidocaine can increase the basal tone of nasal mucosa, while procaine cannot."( Effects of lidocaine and procaine on canine nasal blood vessels.
Jackson, RT; Wang, HW,
)
1.24
"Lidocaine injection to produce anesthetic nerve block resulted in loss of P320, but the potential was relatively preserved during ischemic nerve block."( Pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials following CO2 laser stimulation in man.
Ikeda, A; Kakigi, R; Shibasaki, H,
)
0.85
"Lidocaine did not increase directly BLM A2-induced breakage of DNA in vitro as measured by loss of form I pAT 153 DNA, but it did increase BLM A2-induced DNA strand breaks in intact L1210 cells coincubated with lidocaine and BLM A2."( Lidocaine potentiation of bleomycin A2 cytotoxicity and DNA strand breakage in L1210 and human A-253 cells.
Braun, ID; Kennedy, KA; Lazo, JS; Meandzija, B; Pham, ET; Smaldone, LF, 1985
)
2.43
"Lidocaine did not inhibit the binding of the lysophospholipid to the red cell membrane, but inhibited hemolysis in a manner similar to cholesterol."( The effect of lidocaine on lysophosphatidylcholine-induced cardiac arrhythmias and cellular disturbances.
Choy, PC; Lederman, CL; Man, RY; Neufeld, KJ, 1985
)
1.35

Treatment

Lidocaine pretreatment, preceded by venous occlusion, is the most popular method for reducing pain during the injection of propofol but cannot entirely control such pain. Pretreatment with lidocaine, the beta-receptor agonist, terbutaline, or the adenosine non-blocking xanthine, enprofylline, inhibited the capsaicine induced inflammatory response. Lidocane plaster treatment resulted in a significant mean reduction of one concomitant PHN treatment per patient.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Lidocaine spray treatments were significantly different in the gag reflex (NRS; Gp A: 1.28 ± 0.67, Gp B: 1 ± 0.63, p = 0.0003), ease of esophageal instrumentation (NRS; Gp A: 7.68 ± 0.91, Gp B: 7.95 ± 0.66, p = 0.0042), and pain score (NRS; Gp A: 5.16 ± 2.08, Gp B: 4.53 ± 1.93, p = 0.0059). "( Comparative effectiveness of lidocaine sprays between sitting and supine position for patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Mahawongkajit, P; Soonthornkes, N, 2022
)
2.46
"Lidocaine pretreatment (2-200μg/ml) of LPS injured AEC II cells results in a decrease in TNF-α release, then up-regulates AQP5 expression, which maybe involved in the mechanism of its effects on AEC II cells injured by LPS."( Lidocaine pretreatment up-regulates aquaporin-5 expression in primary alveolar epithelium type II cells injured by lipopolysaccharides.
Sun, H; Wei, J; Xu, D; Yang, J; Yu, H; Yu, S; Zeng, Y, 2021
)
2.79
"Lidocaine treatment relieved SCIRI by reducing Iba1 and serum TNF-α and IL-1β levels."( Lidocaine relieves spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury via long non-coding RNA MIAT-mediated Notch1 downregulation.
Hou, J; Li, H; Ma, J; Xue, C, 2022
)
2.89
"Lidocaine plaster treatment resulted in superior pain relief, significantly fewer restrictions in daily life activities and better quality of life than the oral medications evaluated and was significantly better tolerated."( Localized peripheral neuropathic pain: topical treatment with lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster in routine clinical practice.
Bösl, I; Eerdekens, M; Hollanders, E; Sabatschus, I; Überall, MA, 2022
)
1.68
"Lidocaine treatment markedly reduced patients' clinical scores and improved an imiquimod-induced rat model of psoriasis as competent as systemic delivery of a TNF-α antibody."( Lidocaine Ameliorates Psoriasis by Obstructing Pathogenic CGRP Signaling‒Mediated Sensory Neuron‒Dendritic Cell Communication.
Bai, J; Bao, L; Cai, X; Jiang, B; Li, Q; Li, X; Lou, F; Song, N; Sun, L; Sun, Y; Tang, S; Wang, B; Wang, H; Wang, Z; Wu, Y; Yin, Q; Yu, B; Zhou, H, 2022
)
2.89
"The lidocaine-treated rats (group L) showed elevated paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) as well as histopathological injuries in the lumbar spinal cord compared with the control saline-treated rats (group N)."( Analysis of the long non-coding RNA and mRNA expression profiles associated with lidocaine-induced neurotoxicity in the spinal cord of a rat model.
Cao, Y; Guo, Q; Jian, Y; Li, L; Li, Q; Wang, E; Wu, L; Zhang, Z, 2022
)
1.43
"In lidocaine-treated HeLa cells, increased production of GDF-15 in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) was observed and unprocessed pro-protein form of GDF-15 was secreted extracellularly."( Local anesthetic lidocaine-inducible gene, growth differentiation factor-15 suppresses the growth of cancer cell lines.
Haraguchi-Suzuki, K; Kawabata-Iwakawa, R; Saito, S; Suto, T; Suzuki, T; Takazawa, T, 2022
)
1.57
"In lidocaine-treated HeLa cells, Ki-67 was detected not only in the nucleus but also in the cytoplasm."( Local anesthetic lidocaine induces growth suppression of HeLa cells by decreasing and changing the cellular localization of the proliferation marker Ki-67.
Haraguchi-Suzuki, K; Kawabata-Iwakawa, R; Saito, S; Suto, T; Suzuki, T; Takazawa, T, 2022
)
1.57
"lidocaine treatment or placebo."( Efficacy of prolonged intravenous lidocaine infusion for postoperative movement-evoked pain following hepatectomy: a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Hong, Y; Jiang, C; Kang, Y; Li, H; Li, Y; Liu, F; Xiao, X; Xu, Y; Ye, M; Yu, F; Zhou, L; Zhou, M, 2023
)
1.91
"The lidocaine group was treated with intravenous lidocaine."( A randomised controlled trial of lidocaine infusion on post-operative opioid consumption in patients undergoing robotic colorectal surgery.
Herzog, J; Jensen, AG; Jensen, KM; Lauridsen, JT; Schou, M, 2020
)
1.32
"Lidocaine treatment was associated with modest reduction of pain during tenaculum placement and after IUD insertion."( Uterine or paracervical lidocaine application for pain control during intrauterine contraceptive device insertion: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Hernandez, AV; Martinez-Dominguez, SJ; Perez-Lopez, FR; Perez-Roncero, GR, 2018
)
2.23
"Lidocaine treatment resulted in the arrest of cell-cycle progression in the G1 phase and inhibited Ki-67 expression in a dose-dependent manner."( Lidocaine inhibits melanoma cell proliferation by regulating ERK phosphorylation.
Chen, J; Jiao, Z; Wang, A; Zhong, W, 2019
)
2.68
"Lidocaine treatment reduced the ABCG2, P-gp, MRP1, and MRP2 protein levels in cells."( Lidocine potentiates the cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil to choriocarcinoma cells by downregulating ABC transport proteins expression.
Liu, H; Pang, W; Wang, J; Zhang, X, 2019
)
1.24
"Lidocaine treatment decreased the flux of a cationic lipophilic molecule across the cell layer, but had no effect on the penetration of hydrophilic neutral or negatively charged markers."( Lidocaine turns the surface charge of biological membranes more positive and changes the permeability of blood-brain barrier culture models.
Brás, AR; Castanho, MARB; Deli, MA; Dér, A; Gaspar, D; Kincses, A; Klepe, A; Mészáros, M; Santa-Maria, AR; Valkai, S; Walter, FR; Zimányi, L, 2019
)
2.68
"Lidocaine treatment also activated caspase-3/7 in a dose- and time-dependent manner similarly in both ages."( Despite differences in cytosolic calcium regulation, lidocaine toxicity is similar in adult and neonatal rat dorsal root ganglia in vitro.
Blanck, TJ; Doan, LV; Eydlin, O; Kline, RP; Piskoun, B; Recio-Pinto, E; Rosenberg, AD; Xu, F, 2014
)
1.37
"Lidocaine patch treatment did not reduce combined resting and dynamic pain ratings compared with placebo in patients with severe, persistent inguinal postherniorrhaphy pain."( Lidocaine patch (5%) in treatment of persistent inguinal postherniorrhaphy pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.
Bischoff, JM; Kehlet, H; Petersen, M; Sommer, C; Uçeyler, N; Werner, MU, 2013
)
3.28
"Lidocaine pretreatment does not have a significant effect on tolerability, efficacy, or patient willingness to receive retreatment."( Treatment of neuropathic pain with the capsaicin 8% patch: is pretreatment with lidocaine necessary?
Kern, KU; Nowack, W; Poole, C, 2014
)
1.35
"Lidocaine treatment abrogated chemokine-induced neutrophil arrest and significantly impaired neutrophil transmigration through endothelial cells by inhibition of the protein kinase C-θ while not affecting the selectin-mediated slow leukocyte rolling."( Lidocaine reduces neutrophil recruitment by abolishing chemokine-induced arrest and transendothelial migration in septic patients.
Berger, C; Hahnenkamp, K; Rossaint, J; Van Aken, H; Westphal, M; Zarbock, A, 2014
)
2.57
"Lidocaine-treated animals (Lido 2, 4 and 8 mg/kg/h) showed higher interleukin (IL)-10 plasma levels compared to control animals. "( Lidocaine increases the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 following mechanical ventilation in healthy mice.
Kox, M; Scheffer, GJ; Steegers, M; Van Berkum, B; Van Der Hoeven, J; Van Der Laak, J; Van Der Wal, S; Vaneker, M; Vissers, K, 2015
)
3.3
"Lidocaine spray treatment significantly lowered the overall procedural pain score compared with placebo."( Lidocaine 10% spray to the cervix reduces pain during intrauterine device insertion: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.
Açmaz, G; Aksoy, H; Aksoy, Ü; Babayigit, M; Ozyurt, S, 2016
)
2.6
"Lidocaine spray treatment significantly lowered the pain scores compared with placebo (p < 0.001)."( Effect of lidocaine spray in pain management during office-based endometrial sampling: A randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Acmaz, G; Aksoy, H; Aksoy, U; Aydin, T; Babayigit, MA; Ozyurt, S; Yücel, B, 2016
)
1.56
"The lidocaine topical treatment was continued for months with durable analgesic effect."( Lidocaine 5% Medicated Plaster for Spinal Neuropathic Pain.
Ambrosio, F; Freo, U; Furnari, M; Ori, C, 2016
)
2.36
"Lidocaine treatment resulted in suppression of the mitochondrial electron transport chain and subsequent attenuation of mitochondrial membrane potential, as well as enhanced ROS production, activation of caspase-3/7 and caspase-9, and induction of apoptosis and necrosis in SH-SY5Y cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner. "( The antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine suppresses lidocaine-induced intracellular reactive oxygen species production and cell death in neuronal SH-SY5Y cells.
Hirota, K; Kusunoki, M; Matsuo, Y; Nishi, K; Okamoto, A; Oku, K; Shingu, K; Sumi, C; Takenaga, K; Tanaka, M, 2016
)
2.14
"All lidocaine-treated eyes had transient blepharospasm and conjunctival hyperemia."( Corneal anesthetic effect and ocular tolerance of 3.5% lidocaine gel in comparison with 0.5% aqueous proparacaine and 0.5% viscous tetracaine in normal canines.
Blocker, T; Brinkis, J; Dees, DD; Madsen, R; Venturi, F, 2017
)
1.18
"The lidocaine treatment resulted in significantly decreased brain activity in both patient groups with distinct brain regions responding in each group, and sub-regions within these areas were correlated with pain ratings specifically for each group (medial prefrontal cortex in CBP and thalamus in OA)."( A preliminary fMRI study of analgesic treatment in chronic back pain and knee osteoarthritis.
Apkarian, AV; Baliki, MN; Geha, PY; Harden, N; Jabakhanji, R; Schnitzer, TJ, 2008
)
0.83
"Lidocaine treatment prior to or after induction of cystitis reduced NGF content in the bladder."( Lidocaine prevents referred hyperalgesia associated with cystitis.
Bjorling, DE; Boldon, K; Bushman, W; Guerios, SD; Wang, ZY, 2009
)
2.52
"Lidocaine treatment 4 hr after induction of cystitis failed to prevent referred hyperalgesia despite a similar decrease in bladder NGF."( Lidocaine prevents referred hyperalgesia associated with cystitis.
Bjorling, DE; Boldon, K; Bushman, W; Guerios, SD; Wang, ZY, 2009
)
2.52
"Lidocaine treatment was also significantly associated with enhanced short-term survival (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.09-0.98)."( Risk factors for equine postoperative ileus and effectiveness of prophylactic lidocaine.
Delesalle, C; Deprez, P; Devisscher, L; Dewulf, J; Torfs, S,
)
1.08
"Lidocaine treatment resulted in decreased generation of phosphorylated IkappaB."( Lidocaine inhibits epithelial chemokine secretion via inhibition of nuclear factor kappa B activation.
Amariglio, N; Ben Horin, S; Chowers, Y; Fudim, E; Lang, A; Picard, O, 2010
)
2.52
"Lidocaine pre-treatment also attenuated the number of injury-induced NPY-LI fibers and c-Fos-LI neurons within the CN in a dose-dependent manner."( Pre-treatment with lidocaine suppresses ectopic discharges and attenuates neuropeptide Y and c-Fos expressions in the rat cuneate nucleus following median nerve transection.
Chen, SH; Huang, CT; Lin, CT; Lue, JH; Tsai, YJ; Wang, HY, 2009
)
1.4
"Lidocaine treatment reduced the corticosterone levels compared to saline treatment after catheterisation but not after laparotomy."( Impact of surgical severity and analgesic treatment on plasma corticosterone in rats during surgery.
Abelson, KS; Carlsson, HE; Goldkuhl, R; Hau, J; Klockars, A, 2010
)
1.08
"In lidocaine or NGF pretreatment group, the expression of Bcl-2 (Group L12: 36.60 + or - 3.31, Group L24: 34.73 + or - 1.82, Group L48: 65.17 + or - 1.53; Group N12: 35.70 + or - 1.18 , Group N24: 37.30 + or - 3.86, Group N48: 62.77 + or - 2.91) was obviously increased comparing with control group (Group L: 24.53 + or - 1.48, Group N: 25.43 + or - 1.85), but the number of the apoptosis (Group L12: 32.87 + or - 0.99, Group L24: 31.90 + or - 4.14, Group L48: 24.50 + or - 0.70; Group N12: 32.80 + or - 1.27, Group N24: 32.83 + or - 1.30, Group N48: 23.30 + or - 0.86) and Bax expression (Group L12: 33.47 + or - 1.21, Group L24: 33.70 + or - 1.20, Group L48: 24.67 + or - 2.09; Group N12: 32.17 + or - 2.21, Group N24: 31.97 + or - 1.79, Group N48: 23.27 + or - 1.20) were significantly decreased comparing with the control group (the number of the apoptosis: Group L 67.43 + or - 3.92, Group N 67.80 + or - 3.82; Bax: Group L 59.73 + or - 1.32, Group N 59.37 + or - 1.54, P<0.05 or P<0.01)."( [A study of the protective effects of lidocaine and nerve growth factor pretreatment on cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in gerbils].
Wang, DF; Xie, JD, 2010
)
1.15
"Lidocaine and NGF pretreatment before cerebral I/R can alleviate I/R injury to the cerebral tissue. "( [A study of the protective effects of lidocaine and nerve growth factor pretreatment on cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in gerbils].
Wang, DF; Xie, JD, 2010
)
2.07
"Lidocaine treatment was found to block the learning-associated structural remodeling of the MFTF that was reported previously and observed in the PBS-injected controls."( Lidocaine injections targeting CA3 hippocampus impair long-term spatial memory and prevent learning-induced mossy fiber remodeling.
Holahan, MR; Routtenberg, A, 2011
)
2.53
"Lidocaine pretreatment, preceded by venous occlusion, is the most popular method for reducing pain during the injection of propofol but cannot entirely control such pain."( Efficacy of the lidocaine/flurbiprofen axetil combination for reducing pain during the injection of propofol.
Fujii, Y; Itakura, M, 2011
)
1.44
"Lidocaine treatment decreased apoptosis rate of AECⅡ, increased percentage of G2/M and S phase cells, and increased protein levels of PCNA."( [Protective effects of lidocaine on hyperoxia-exposed type Ⅱalveolar epithelial cells from premature rats].
Ding, XF; Li, J; Zhang, B; Zhong, LL, 2011
)
1.4
"Lidocaine plaster treatment resulted in a significant mean reduction of one concomitant PHN treatment per patient in the overall efficacy population analysed at the end of the observation (p < 0.001)."( 5% lidocaine medicated plaster in elderly patients with postherpetic neuralgia: results of a compassionate use programme in France.
Clère, F; Delorme-Morin, C; Ganry, H; George, B; Navez, M; Rioult, B; Tiberghien-Chatelain, F, 2011
)
1.71
"With lidocaine treatment all goats were severely ataxic or recumbent, after tramadol-lidocaine mildly ataxic, and after tramadol not ataxic."( Evaluation of anti-nociceptive effect of epidural tramadol, tramadol-lidocaine and lidocaine in goats.
Bigham-Sadegh, A; Dehkordi, SH; Gerami, R, 2012
)
1.07
"Lidocaine, both pretreatment and mixed, significantly reduced the INDS."( Reducing the pain of intranasal drug administration.
Antonio, C; Creighton, P; Heard, C; Johnson, K; Zurek, J,
)
0.85
"Only lidocaine pretreatment was an independently associated factor against pain perception (OR, 0.380; 95% CI, 0.177-0.815; P = 0.013)."( Incidence of propofol injection pain and effect of lidocaine pretreatment during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Cho, KB; Chung, WJ; Hwang, JS; Jang, BK; Kim, ES; Kim, TY; Kwon, JS; Lee, JE; Park, KS; Park, WY, 2012
)
1.09
"Lidocaine treatment abolished almost completely reperfusion arrhythmias in the FO group, but did not display anti-arrhythmic properties in the SSO group."( Mitochondrial basis of the anti-arrhythmic action of lidocaine and modulation by the n-6 to n-3 PUFA ratio of cardiac phospholipids.
Clauw, F; Demaison, L; Moreau, D; Rochette, L; Vergely, C, 2013
)
1.36
"Lidocaine treatment had no significant influence on local cerebral blood flow and electroencephalogram during ischemia and reperfusion."( Effects of delayed administration of low-dose lidocaine on transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats.
Capuano-Waters, C; Cottrell, JE; Kass, IS; Lei, B; Popp, S, 2002
)
1.29
"Lidocaine-treated horses had significantly better minimum jejunal cross-sectional area scores (P = .011), minimum jejunal diameter scores (P = .002), and intestinal ultrasound index (IUI) (P = .007)."( Intravenous lidocaine and small-intestinal size, abdominal fluid, and outcome after colic surgery in horses.
Bassage, L; Brianceau, P; Chevalier, H; Court, MH; Karas, A; Kirker-Head, C; Paradis, MR; Provost, P,
)
1.23
"Lidocaine treatment improved early electrophysiological recovery and reduced the size of the cortical infarct at 24 h, but had no significant effect on cerebral blood flow in either the penumbra or core during ischemia."( Lidocaine attenuates apoptosis in the ischemic penumbra and reduces infarct size after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats.
Capuano-Waters, C; Cottrell, JE; Kass, IS; Lei, B; Popp, S, 2004
)
2.49
"Lidocaine-treated mice exhibited impaired object recognition memory, measured as reduced novel object preference, after a 24 h but not a 5 min retention interval."( On the delay-dependent involvement of the hippocampus in object recognition memory.
Hammond, RS; Stackman, RW; Tull, LE, 2004
)
1.04
"Lidocaine or heat treatment of T24 cells during sonication enhanced luciferase expression significantly. "( Ultrasound mediated intravesical transfection enhanced by treatment with lidocaine or heat.
Feril, LB; Fuse, H; Kagiya, G; Kondo, T; Nakaya, N; Nozaki, T; Ogawa, R, 2004
)
2
"Lidocaine pretreatment is the most popular method for reducing this pain but this drug cannot entirely eliminate the problem."( A lidocaine/metoclopramide combination decreases pain on injection of propofol.
Fujii, Y; Nakayama, M, 2005
)
1.77
"The lidocaine-treated animals captured the prey by using mostly the mouth, with little forepaw assistance, and were less effective in capturing the roaches."( Effects of ventrolateral striatal inactivation on predatory hunting.
Baldo, MV; Canteras, NS; da Cunha, C; dos Santos, LM; Ferro, MM; Mota-Ortiz, SR, 2007
)
0.82
"Lidocaine treatment was not associated with mortality rate or postoperative complications, but was associated with prolonged hospitalization time."( Evaluation of lidocaine treatment and risk factors for death associated with gastric dilatation and volvulus in dogs: 112 cases (1997-2005).
Bdolah-Abram, T; Bruchim, Y; Buber, T; Epstein, A; Ranen, E; Saragusty, J, 2007
)
1.42
"Lidocaine treatment of the CN caused a similar increase in apoptosis (1.6-fold) and decrease in SHH protein (1.3-fold) in the penis."( Neural influences on sonic hedgehog and apoptosis in the rat penis.
Bond, C; Podlasek, CA; Tang, Y, 2008
)
1.07
"In Lidocaine treated group: 11 excellent (44%), 5 good (20%) and 9 ineffective (36%)."( [Comparative study of the anti-arrhythmic activity of mexiletine and lidocaine in ventricular hyperkinetic arrhythmias].
Bonatti, V; Botti, G; Favaro, L; Finardi, A; Rolli, A, 1981
)
1.01
"Lidocaine treatment elicited modest improvements in systemic arterial blood pressure and reduced relative glucose utilization and gluconeogenesis, but in itself, was not a sufficient therapy for endotoxic shock in this model."( Lidocaine therapy in awake endotoxemic Yucatan minipigs. I. Metabolic parameters and glucose biokinetics.
Brooks, PA; Chandrasena, LG; Cleek, JL; Fettman, MJ; Hand, MS; Mason, RA; Phillips, RW, 1984
)
2.43
"Lidocaine-treated animals, in the absence of convulsions, exhibited decreased glucose utilization in most brain structures compared to saline-treated animals and showed no increase in aggressive behavior."( Metabolic and behavioral consequences of lidocaine-kindled seizures.
Ingvar, DH; Kennedy, C; Miyaoka, M; Post, RM; Shinohara, M; Sokoloff, L; Squillace, K; Suda, S, 1984
)
1.25
"Lidocaine-treated macrophages incorporated less protozoa than normal macrophages."( Phagocytosis of Herpetomonas samuelpessoai by mouse peritoneal macrophages: effect of lidocaine, concanavalin A and carbohydrates.
Alviano, CS; Angluster, J; De Souza, W; Oda, LM, 1982
)
1.21
"Lidocaine pretreatment (10 mg/kg i.v.) was effective in preventing VF in rats, but increased the incidence of CR-induced VF in dogs and significantly (P less than 0.01) reduced the mean time to VF during CO in pigs."( Acute coronary artery occlusion-reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in rats, dogs and pigs: antiarrhythmic evaluation of quinidine, procainamide and lidocaine.
Bergey, JL; McCallum, JD; Nocella, K, 1982
)
1.19
"The lidocaine treatment consisted of an infusion of 0.8 mg/kg/min over 10 min, followed by an infusion of 0.085 mg/kg/min over 3 h."( Lidocaine plasma concentrations obtained with a standardized infusion in the awake and anaesthetized dog.
Belpaire, F; Bogaert, M; De Rick, A; Rosseel, MT, 1981
)
2.19
"Lidocaine pretreatment has recently been shown to attenuate endotoxin-induced lung injury in rabbits."( Does early posttreatment with lidocaine attenuate endotoxin-induced acute injury in rabbits?
Maekawa, N; Mikawa, K; Nishina, K; Obara, H; Takao, Y, 1995
)
1.3
"In lidocaine-pretreated dogs, histamine decreased airway area to 79 +/- 4% of baseline (p < 0.01)."( Prevention of bronchoconstriction by an orally active local anesthetic.
Brown, RH; Hirshman, C; Robbins, W; Staats, P, 1995
)
0.81
"Lidocaine pretreatment attenuated these changes."( Effect of lidocaine pretreatment on endotoxin-induced lung injury in rabbits.
Maekawa, N; Mikawa, K; Nishina, K; Obara, H; Takao, Y; Yaku, H, 1994
)
1.41
"The lidocaine-gel treatment appears to be very useful for reduction of pain associated with acute or subacute phase of herpes zoster."( [Transdermal application of 10% lidocaine-gel for management of pain associated with herpes zoster].
Ikuta, Y; Kano, T; Mishima, M; Morioka, T; Nakano, M; Shimoda, O; Takaki, M; Tashima, T; Tashiro, M, 1993
)
1.05
"The lidocaine treatment, which induced seizures in some of the animals, was without significant effect on the biochemical markers."( Electroconvulsive shock and lidocaine-induced seizures in the rat activate astrocytes as measured by glial fibrillary acidic protein.
Bolwig, TG; Jørgensen, OS; Kragh, J; Woldbye, DP,
)
0.91
"In lidocaine-treated animals PMN CD11b expression was maintained at basal levels 2 hours after reperfusion, compared with group II, in which upregulation of CD11b was observed."( Lidocaine reduces reperfusion injury and neutrophil migration in canine lung allografts.
Ando, K; Cooper, JD; Patterson, GA; Schmid, RA; Tanaka, Y; Yamashita, M, 1996
)
2.25
"Lidocaine treatment evokes a substantially higher proliferative response than bFGF and, importantly, a durable angiogenic response in skeletal muscle."( Induction of angiogenesis by lidocaine and basic fibroblast growth factor: a model for in vivo retroviral-mediated gene therapy.
Burkel, WE; Carlson, BM; Gordon, D; Jejurikar, SS; Messina, LM; Welling, TH; Zelenock, JA, 1997
)
1.31
"Lidocaine-treated patients first experienced flatulence in a significantly shorter time (P < 0.01) than control patients."( Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Fisher, HA; Groudine, SB; Kaufman, RP; Lumb, PD; Mehta, SA; Patel, MK; Wilkins, LJ, 1998
)
1.4
"Lidocaine-treated patients had shorter hospital stays, less pain, and faster return of bowel function."( Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Fisher, HA; Groudine, SB; Kaufman, RP; Lumb, PD; Mehta, SA; Patel, MK; Wilkins, LJ, 1998
)
1.4
"Lidocaine pretreatment attenuated these changes."( Intravenous lidocaine attenuates acute lung injury induced by hydrochloric acid aspiration in rabbits.
Maekawa, N; Mikawa, K; Nishina, K; Obara, H; Shiga, M; Takao, Y, 1998
)
1.4
"Lidocaine-treated animals exhibited persistent sensory impairment, whereas glucose- and saline-treated animals did not. "( Comparative toxicity of glucose and lidocaine administered intrathecally in the rat.
Bollen, AW; Ciriales, R; Drasner, K; Hashimoto, K; Sakura, S,
)
1.85
"Lidocaine-treated rats had impaired memory for the classical fear conditioning when they were compared with the saline-treated controls: they spent less time freezing, entered the shock arm more readily and more often, and spent more time in it."( Basolateral amygdala is involved in modulating consolidation of memory for classical fear conditioning.
McGaugh, JL; Vazdarjanova, A, 1999
)
1.02
"Lidocaine treatment attenuated these changes."( Lidocaine attenuates acute lung injury induced by a combination of phospholipase A2 and trypsin.
Kiyonari, Y; Maekawa, N; Mikawa, K; Nishina, K; Obara, H, 2000
)
2.47
"Lidocaine treated patients had significantly less abdominal postoperative pain immediately on return to the ward and during the first postoperative day (P<0.05)."( Intraperitoneal lidocaine for postoperative pain after laparoscopy.
Ali, NM; Elhakim, M; Elkott, M; Tahoun, HM, 2000
)
1.37
"Lidocaine treatment prevented the increased stickiness of white cells and, at the same time, the microvascular haemorrhage developing after APS."( Increased interaction of vascular endothelium and leucocytes after administration of antiplatelet serum: role in the developing vascular defect.
Caen, JP; Kovacs, IB, 1979
)
0.98
"Lidocaine-treated dogs recovered 60 +/- 10% (mean +/- 95% confidence limits) of the baseline somatosensory evoked potential amplitude 220 minutes after air embolism; saline-treated dogs recovered 32 +/- 10% (a significant difference at p less than 0.01). "( Effect of lidocaine on somatosensory evoked response and cerebral blood flow after canine cerebral air embolism.
Clark, JB; Dutka, AJ; Hallenbeck, JM; McDermott, J; Mink, R, 1992
)
2.13
"All lidocaine-treated piglets took more time to attach than C piglets."( Sensory systems and nipple attachment behavior in neonatal pigs.
McGlone, JJ; Morrow-Tesch, J, 1990
)
0.76
"Lidocaine pretreatment resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of this ischemia-induced CA release from adrenergic neurons (0.96 +/- 0.06 and 1.30 +/- 0.05% for the lower and higher dose, respectively)."( Effects of lidocaine on catecholamine release in the ischemic rat heart.
Addicks, K; Brinkmann, C; Hirche, H; McDonald, FM; Polwin, W, 1987
)
1.38
"Lidocaine-treated patients had fewer cardiac dysrhythmias (P less than 0.05) and 34 per cent of them had tinnitus."( Haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in geriatric patients: effects of fentanyl, lidocaine and thiopentone.
Cervenko, F; Splinter, WM, 1989
)
1.21
"Lidocaine treatment did not alter the hemodynamic measurements and resulted in metabolic acidosis and hypoalbuminemia."( Lidocaine treatment of dogs with Escherichia coli septicemia.
Hardie, EM; Rakich, PM; Rawlings, CA; Shotts, EB; Waltman, DW, 1988
)
2.44
"The lidocaine-treated group had significantly lower pain scores and meperidine requirements during the first postoperative day compared to the control groups."( Topical anesthesia with lidocaine aerosol in the control of postoperative pain.
Cassuto, J; Ekman, R; Faxén, A; Hedner, T; Högström, S; Lindén, I; Sinclair, R, 1988
)
1.06
"Lidocaine HCl pretreatment improved the response to hemorrhagic shock and reinfusion in this model of hemorrhagic shock."( Effect of lidocaine pretreatment on acute hemorrhagic shock in the anesthetized rat.
Keith, JC, 1986
)
1.39
"The lidocaine-treated patients had significantly lower pain scores during the first day after surgery (P less than 0.001) and required significantly less meperidine during the first (P less than 0.02) and second postoperative days (P less than 0.01)."( Inhibition of postoperative pain by continuous low-dose intravenous infusion of lidocaine.
Cassuto, J; Faxén, A; Högström, S; Rimbäck, G; Wallin, G, 1985
)
0.98
"Treatment with lidocaine alone or with the steroid resulted in decreases of 4.46 and 4.29 points, respectively, in pain scores and of 15.8 and 14.46 points, respectively, in functional scores at 6 months."( Clinical Efficacy of Epidural Injections of Local Anesthetic Alone or Combined with Steroid for Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bao, SX; Li, BZ; Li, Y; Liu, MG; Tang, WH; Zhou, L, 2022
)
1.06
"Pre-treatment with lidocaine or flurbiprofen axetil has proven to be effectual in the reduction propofol-induced pain in adults."( Clinical therapeutic effects of lidocaine combination with flurbiprofen axetil for reducing propofol-induced pain in adults: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fu, J; Lu, G; Sun, W; Ye, X; Yu, J, 2020
)
1.16
"Pretreatment with lidocaine could be served as one effective approach to decrease both the incidence and the severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus, with limited influence on the hemodynamic stability of patients. "( Pretreatment with lidocaine reduces both incidence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Lang, B; Li, F; Lin, Y; Yang, C; Zhang, L; Zhang, W, 2018
)
1.15
"Treatment with lidocaine or placebo plaster led to a clinically relevant reduction in average pain intensity. "( Lidocaine medicated plaster, an additional potential treatment option for localized post-surgical neuropathic pain: efficacy and safety results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Attal, N; Boesl, I; Buchheister, B; Koenig, S; Palladini, M, 2019
)
2.31
"Treatment with lidocaine in pediatric cluster seizures may be useful and may be considered as a therapeutic option. "( Long-term Outcome of Intravenous Lidocaine in Pediatric Cluster Seizures: A Preliminary Study.
Jóźwiak, S; Strzelecka, J; Słowińska, M, 2019
)
1.15
"Treatment with lidocaine also significantly inhibited the phosphorylation of p38 MAPK and the nuclear translocation of NF-κB p50/p65, increased the protein levels of inhibitor kappa B-α."( Lidocaine attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory responses in microglia.
Li, X; Li, Z; Wang, N; Yang, X; Yu, G; Yuan, T, 2014
)
2.18
"Treatment with lidocaine or other alternative drugs in cases of prolonged SE should be taken into account as soon as it becomes clear that the clinical condition is refractory to common AEDs included in available guidelines for SE treatment, to improve the bad outcome of this severe condition, at least limiting the negative effects of prolonged high metabolic demand due to continuous epileptiform activity and/or the possible negative effects of prolonged burst-suppression coma."( Lidocaine treatment in refractory status epilepticus resulting from febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome: a case report and follow-up.
Briatore, E; Calzolari, S; Capizzi, G; Conio, A; Davico, C; Longobardo, A; Podestà, B; Rainò, E; Torta, F; Vittorini, R, 2015
)
2.2
"Pretreatment with lidocaine significantly reduced both the incidence and severity of myoclonic movements."( Lidocaine pretreatment reduces the frequency and severity of myoclonus induced by etomidate.
Akkaya, T; Bedirli, N; Gultop, F; Gumus, H, 2010
)
2.13
"Treatment with lidocaine reduced net fluid secretion in the small intestine and the colon."( Rotavirus infection of murine small intestine causes colonic secretion via age restricted galanin-1 receptor expression.
Bansal, A; Benya, R; Habib, I; Hempson, SJ; Mackow, ER; Matkowskyj, K; Shaw, RD; Tsao, E, 2010
)
0.7
"Pretreatment with lidocaine significantly reduced chemotactic response to monocyte chemotactic protein-1 of IFN-γ-activated microglial cells."( Lidocaine attenuates the development of diabetic-induced tactile allodynia by inhibiting microglial activation.
Hasegawa-Moriyama, M; Inada, E; Kamikubo, Y; Sakurai, T; Suzuki, N; Takahashi, Y, 2011
)
2.14
"Pretreatment with lidocaine or metoclopramide equally and significantly reduced the incidence and severity of propofol induced pain (76%)."( The effects of remifentanil, lidocaine, metoclopramide, or ketamine pretreatment on propofol injection pain.
Aktay, M; Ozlü, O; Polat, R, 2012
)
0.99
"Treatment with lidocaine caused an increase in the percentage of migrating cells (up to 75.0+/-5.6) in velocity dose dependently (up to 0.33+/-0.06) and in distance migrated (up to 151.5+/-92.9)."( Influence of non-volatile anesthetics on the migration behavior of the human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-468.
Brandt, L; Garib, V; Kubens, BS; Niggemann, B; Zänker, KS, 2002
)
0.65
"Rats treated with lidocaine demonstrated better neurologic outcome and less weight loss (P < 0.05)."( Effects of delayed administration of low-dose lidocaine on transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats.
Capuano-Waters, C; Cottrell, JE; Kass, IS; Lei, B; Popp, S, 2002
)
0.9
"Pre-treatment with lidocaine before Propofol-MCT/LCT seems to have an additional effect."( [Propofol-LCT versus propofol-MCT/LCT with or without lidocaine - a comparison on pain on injection].
Haaf-Von-Below, S; Kuhlen, R; Kunitz, O; Lösing, R; Rossaint, R; Schulz-Stübner, S, 2004
)
0.89
"Pretreatment with lidocaine (10 microM), but not procaine (50 microM), restored the membrane potential after the reintroduction of oxygen and glucose."( Neuroprotective mechanisms of lidocaine against in vitro ischemic insult of the rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons.
Higashi, H; Kuroiwa, M; Murai, Y; Niiyama, S; Noguchi, M; Sakamoto, H; Satani, M; Takahashi, K; Tanaka, E; Tsuji, S; Yamada, A, 2005
)
0.94
"Pretreatment with lidocaine and amifostine-but not with pilocarpine-induced lower up-regulation of TN-C expression 72 h after radiation."( Pharmacological prevention of radiation-induced dry eye-an experimental study in a rabbit model.
Beutel, J; Geerling, G; Hakim, SG; Kosmehl, H; Rades, D; Schroder, C; Sieg, P; von Hof, K; Wedel, T, 2007
)
0.66
"Pretreatment with lidocaine, metoclopramide, or flurbiprofen axetil has been reported to be effective in reducing propofol-induced pain."( Comparison of lidocaine, metoclopramide, and flurbiprofen axetil for reducing pain on injection of propofol in Japanese adult surgical patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study.
Fujii, Y; Itakura, M, 2008
)
1.03
"Treatment with lidocaine was administered in two fashions: as single inhalation or inhalation bid for 7 consecutive days, for comparison with a saline-inhaled control group."( Continued inhalation of lidocaine suppresses antigen-induced airway hyperreactivity and airway inflammation in ovalbumin-sensitized guinea pigs.
Haraguchi, R; Iwanaga, T; Kubo, H; Muraki, M; Tohda, Y, 2008
)
0.99
"Pretreatment with lidocaine also greatly attenuated the acute hypertension and the increase in intracranial pressure following air embolism."( Protective effect of lidocaine in acute cerebral ischemia induced by air embolism.
Bradley, ME; Evans, DE; Kobrine, AI; LeGrys, DC, 1984
)
0.91
"Pretreatment with lidocaine (10 mg/kg) significantly reduced the incidence of VT and caused low but not significant reductions in the incidences of VF and mortality induced by aconitine."( R 56 865, a Na+/Ca(2+)-overload inhibitor, protects against aconitine-induced cardiac arrhythmias in vivo.
De Clerck, F; Lu, HR, 1993
)
0.61
"pre-treatment with lidocaine at the lumbar level."( Specific contribution of lumbar spinal mechanisms to persistent nociceptive responses in the formalin test.
Coderre, TJ; Henry, JL; Yashpal, K, 1994
)
0.61
"Pretreatment with lidocaine reduced the incidence of pain and discomfort significantly compared with unpretreated groups."( Pain on injection of propofol.
Chen, GT; Chen, TY; Hwang, MH; Lin, JC; Lin, SS, 1994
)
0.61
"Pretreatment with lidocaine, methysergide, or hexamethonium did not change the results of tactile stimulation on the blood flow."( Influence of tactile stimulation of the rat gastric mucosa on blood flow and acid output.
Holm, L; Jägare, A, 1993
)
0.61
"Pretreatment with lidocaine or bupivacaine had a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on PMNG luminol-amplified chemiluminescence stimulated by bovine serum albumin (BSA)/anti-BSA immune complexes (IC) or by serum-opsonized zymosan (SOZ) particles."( Inhibitory effects of amide local anaesthetics on stimulus-induced human leukocyte metabolic activation, LTB4 release and IL-1 secretion in vitro.
Cassuto, J; Eriksson, AS; Gretzer, C; Sinclair, R; Thomsen, P, 1993
)
0.61
"Pretreatment with lidocaine (10 mg/kg, n = 6) caused a significant increase in the dose of ouabain needed to initiate cardiac arrhythmias and to cause death."( Inhibition of Na+/Ca2+ overload with R 56,865 protects against cardiac arrhythmias elicited by ouabain in vivo in guinea-pigs.
De Clerck, F; Lu, HR; Remeysen, P, 1993
)
0.61
"Pretreatment with lidocaine (5 mg/kg), verapamil (0.63 mg/kg), R56865 (0.63 mg/kg) or ethylisobutyl amiloride (1.25 mg/kg) significantly reduced or abolished all types of ventricular arrhythmias."( Ischemia/reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in anaesthetized rats: a role of Na+ and Ca2+ influx.
Dai, DZ; De Clerck, F; Lu, HR; Remeysen, P; Saels, A; Yang, P, 1999
)
0.63
"The treatment with lidocaine followed by mexiletine was useful for controlling clusters of intractable seizures."( [A successful treatment with intravenous lidocaine followed by oral mexiletine in a patient with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome].
Miyamoto, A; Oki, J; Takahashi, S, 1999
)
0.89
"Treatment with lidocaine 15 microM suppressed OZ-activated CLA phenyl-dependent chemiluminescence by approximately 40% compared with that of OZ only-activated neutrophils."( The effects of lidocaine on superoxide production and p47 Phox translocation in opsonized zymosan-activated neutrophils.
Arakawa, K; Nakagawa, S; Ogawa, S; Takahashi, H, 2001
)
1
"Pretreatment with lidocaine, the beta-receptor agonist, terbutaline, or the adenosine non-blocking xanthine, enprofylline, inhibited the capsaicine induced inflammatory response."( Anti-asthma drugs and capsaicine-induced microvascular effects in lower airways.
Erjefält, I; Persson, CG, 1985
)
0.59

Toxicity

Intracameral lidocaine may be a safe and effective alternative anaesthesia method in trabeculectomy for uncomplicated primary open-angle glaucoma.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"5 mg/ml or higher, adverse effects were not completely reversible."( Adverse effects of lidocaine and methylparaben on tracheal ciliary activity.
Dreisin, RB; LaForce, FM; Manawadu, BR; Mostow, SR, 1979
)
0.59
"The influence of LD50 of lidocain by preliminary treatment with pethidin, aminophenazone or diazepam, respectively, is examined at the mouse."( [Over-additive increase of the toxicity of lidocaine by pethidine].
Lampe, D; Lange, B; Mai, I, 1976
)
0.52
"Etidocaine given by intravenous infusion has been compared, using a double-blind technique, with bupivacaine and lignocaine in respect of toxic symptoms and signs."( Evaluation of the toxicity of local anaesthetic agents in man.
Scott, DB, 1975
)
0.25
" Despite prior reports of this complication in the literature, many practitioners are unaware of the potential adverse effects of topical lidocaine usage in the pediatric patient."( Toxicity--seizures in an infant caused by (or related to) oral viscous lidocaine use.
Rose, R; Smith, M; Wolfram, W,
)
0.57
" We conclude that central nervous system toxic effects of amide/amide or amide/ester anesthetic combinations, such as might occur during accidental intravascular injection, are no more than when the drugs are administered alone."( Central nervous system toxicity of local anesthetic mixtures in the rat.
Baker, MT; Dexter, F; Spiegel, DA; Todd, MM; Warner, DS, 1992
)
0.28
" This work suggests that the lethal cardiorespiratory toxicity of lidocaine and bupivacaine associated with intravenous infusion is additively toxic in rats."( Lidocaine and bupivacaine cardiorespiratory toxicity is additive: a study in rats.
Erskine, R; James, MF; Janicki, PK; Mets, B; Sasman, B, 1992
)
1.96
" This muscle distention causes sufficient bowel displacement to allow safe advancement of biopsy needles as large as 14 gauge through the distended muscle belly to the region of interest."( A safe route for deep pelvic biopsy with distention of the iliacus muscle.
Carlson, P; Crummy, AB; McDermott, JC; Wojtowycz, M, 1991
)
0.28
" No adverse effects were noted from lidocaine injection or tourniquet release."( Intravenous regional anesthesia: a safe and cost-effective outpatient anesthetic for upper extremity fracture treatment in children.
Barnes, CL; Blasier, RD; Dodge, BM,
)
0.41
" Adenosine did not terminate tachycardia or have any serious adverse effect in any patient; both flecainide and disopyramide were significantly more effective than lignocaine, but flecainide had significantly more severe adverse effects than lignocaine."( Relative efficacy and safety of intravenous drugs for termination of sustained ventricular tachycardia.
Camm, AJ; Garratt, CJ; Griffith, MJ; Linker, NJ; Ward, DE, 1990
)
0.28
"The toxic effects of cocaine are enhanced in the presence of lidocaine."( Lidocaine potentiation of cocaine toxicity.
Albertson, TE; Derlet, RW; Tharratt, RS, 1991
)
1.97
" However, neurotoxicity studies are required before these agents can be considered safe for clinical use."( Ketamine and midazolam neurotoxicity in the rabbit.
Cozian, A; Lepage, JY; Malinovsky, JM; Mussini, JM; Pinaud, M; Souron, R, 1991
)
0.28
"Tonsillectomy using local anesthesia (local tonsillectomy) is a safe and effective alternative to general anesthesia in the healthy cooperative teenage or adult patient."( Tonsillectomy under local anesthesia: a safe and effective alternative.
Abemayor, E; Bredenkamp, JK; Wackym, PA; Ward, PH,
)
0.13
"Sedoanalgesia is a technique developed to provide safe and satisfactory operating conditions for a wide range of patients independent of age and overall level of fitness (although its use in children remains to be established)."( Sedoanalgesia in urology: a safe, cost-effective alternative to general anaesthesia. A review of 1020 cases.
Anson, KM; Birch, BR; Miller, RA, 1990
)
0.28
"Pregnant sheep are more vulnerable to the toxic effects of bupivacaine, a potent local anesthetic, than are nonpregnant sheep."( Pregnancy does not alter lidocaine toxicity.
Arthur, GR; Covino, BG; Finster, M; Morishima, HO, 1990
)
0.58
" Minor central nervous system side effects were seen in 2 patients and dermatologic adverse reaction was seen in one patient only."( Efficacy and safety of oral tocainide in refractory ventricular arrhythmia: a preliminary report on an open label study.
Mahapatra, D; Mahapatra, RK, 1986
)
0.27
" A common cause of drug trial failure for both drugs was the occurrence of adverse effects that frequently appeared well after hospital discharge."( Mexiletine and tocainide: a comparison of antiarrhythmic efficacy, adverse effects, and predictive value of lidocaine testing.
Barbey, JT; Echt, DS; Kopelman, HA; Murray, KT; Roden, DM; Siddoway, LA; Woosley, RL, 1989
)
0.49
" Other DNA-interacting antitumor agents, such as etoposide and mitomycin C, did not exhibit biologically significant alterations in their cytotoxicity when coincubated with lidocaine, although cis-diamminedichloroplatinum was significantly more toxic in the presence of lidocaine."( Lidocaine potentiation of bleomycin A2 cytotoxicity and DNA strand breakage in L1210 and human A-253 cells.
Braun, ID; Kennedy, KA; Lazo, JS; Meandzija, B; Pham, ET; Smaldone, LF, 1985
)
1.91
"The aim of the present study was to compare the reliability of LD50 determination using the traditional Litchfield and Wilcoxon method with that obtained by four alternative tests requiring smaller numbers of animals, for the purpose of classifying chemicals according to their acute toxicity."( Comparison of five methods for the determination of lethal dose in acute toxicity studies.
Carvalho, RR; Cunha, FQ; Fingola, FF; Freitas, JC; Menezes, MA; Paumgartten, FJ; Presgrave, OA, 1989
)
0.28
" Dose-response curves were constructed from the data obtained, and the CD50 and LD50 values for each local anesthetic alone and in combination with each of the vasoconstrictors were calculated by probit analysis."( Modification of local anesthetic toxicity by vasoconstrictors.
Dorris, RL; Taylor, SE,
)
0.13
"There is a narrow margin between therapeutic and toxic doses and serum levels of digitalis glycosides."( Digitalis toxicity.
Antman, EM; Smith, TW, 1985
)
0.27
"The greatest differences in ventricular arrhythmias and adverse effects of lidocaine observed in this study were between patients on both lidocaine and a beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent and those on neither drug."( Increased efficacy and toxicity of lidocaine in patients on beta-blockers.
Kellen, J; Rademaker, AW; Tam, Y; Wyse, DG, 1988
)
0.78
" Using only topical and nebulized anesthesia is safe and effective for performing fiberoptic bronchoscopy, especially when bacterial cultures are to be obtained and endobronchial instillation of lidocaine must be avoided."( Safety and efficacy of using high-dose topical and nebulized anesthesia to obtain endobronchial cultures.
Berger, R; McConnell, JW; Overman, TL; Phillips, B, 1989
)
0.47
" Immediate pretreatment with verapamil increased the mortality of mice given the LD50 dose of lidocaine to 74%, and in mice given the LD50 doses of bupivacaine, to 82%."( Verapamil increases the toxicity of local anesthetics.
Rosenblatt, RM; Tallman, RD; Wang, YL; Weaver, JM, 1988
)
0.49
" Probit analysis of lethal dose-response curve data revealed that lidocaine, with or without epinephrine, was significantly more toxic intravenously than by internal carotid artery injection and that epinephrine potentiated the intravascular toxicity of lidocaine."( Intravascular lidocaine toxicity: influence of epinephrine and route of administration.
Yagiela, JA,
)
0.73
" The pharmacokinetics of these compounds are discussed in this review, with particular emphasis on the fetal exposure and its relationship to adverse effects on the fetus."( Clinical pharmacokinetics in pregnancy and perinatology. I. Placental transfer and fetal side effects of local anaesthetic agents.
Nau, H, 1985
)
0.27
" Thus, tocainide, the new oral analog of lidocaine, appears to be as safe as quinidine but is slightly less effective in suppressing ventricular arrhythmias."( Comparative efficacy and safety of oral tocainide and quinidine for benign and potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias.
Morganroth, J; Oshrain, C; Steele, PP, 1985
)
0.54
"The mini-dose Bier block, a technique of intravenous (IV) regional anesthesia that uses low-dose lidocaine and provides safe and effective anesthesia for outpatient closed reductions of upper extremity fractures and dislocations, is presented."( Safe and effective IV regional anesthesia for use in the emergency department.
Farrell, RG; Swanson, SL; Walter, JR, 1985
)
0.49
"The mini-dose Bier block, a technique of intravenous (IV) regional anesthesia that uses low-dose lidocaine and provides safe and effective anesthesia for outpatient closed reductions of upper extremity fractures and dislocations, is presented."( Safe and effective IV regional anesthesia for use in the emergency department.
Farrell, RG; Swanson, SL; Walter, JR, 1985
)
0.49
" lidocaine, as shown by marked reduction of LD50 by either opioid."( Opioid effects on lidocaine disposition and toxicity in mice.
Ben-Zvi, Z; Garty, M; Hurwitz, A, 1985
)
1.51
" Onset of electrical seizure activity occurred at about the same time in both groups and was defined as the central nervous system (CNS) toxic end point."( Toxicity and resuscitation in lidocaine- or bupivacaine-infused cats.
Chadwick, HS, 1985
)
0.56
" These results suggest that the CNS is the primary target organ for the toxic effects of both highly lipid-soluble and highly protein-bound local anesthetics (i."( Comparative CNS toxicity of lidocaine, etidocaine, bupivacaine, and tetracaine in awake dogs following rapid intravenous administration.
Covino, BG; Feldman, HS; Giasi, R; Liu, PL; Patterson, MK, 1983
)
0.56
" There was a marked degree of absorption only in patients with thermal burns, in which case it depended on the surface area of the wound; although no toxic effects due to absorption were noted, caution in dosage is advisable."( Sterile topical lignocaine jelly in plastic surgery: an assessment of its systemic toxicity.
Bach, PH; Read, JM, 1980
)
0.26
" Although drugs can ameliorate certain toxic effects, indiscriminate use of purported antidotes can have deleterious results."( Toxicity of tricyclic antidepressants--kinetics, mechanism, intervention: a review.
Irwin, HA; Preskorn, SH, 1982
)
0.26
" An identical sequence of toxic manifestations occurred in the adult, newborn, and fetus: convulsions, hypotension, respiratory arrest, and circulatory collapse."( Toxicity of lidocaine in adult, newborn, and fetal sheep.
Bruce, SL; Covino, BG; Finster, M; Gutsche, BB; Morishima, HO; Pedersen, H; Sakuma, K; Stark, RI, 1981
)
0.64
"In a study of 7 cases of adverse reactions to local anaesthetics the early symptoms of toxicity (malaise, anxiety, feeling of impending death, peripheral paresthesias and tachycardia) are reviewed."( [Minor toxic effects of local anaesthetics. 7 cases (author's transl)].
Dry, J; Leynadier, F, 1980
)
0.26
"25% bupivacaine is administered as a continuous infusion or repeated bolus, serum bupivacaine levels frequently approach the toxic range."( The safety of continuous pleural lignocaine after thoracotomy in children and adolescents.
Balsara, RK; Lear, BR; Pasquariello, CA; Schwartz, RE; Stayer, SA, 1995
)
0.29
" The animals pretreated with lidocaine were compared with the control animals for the number of adverse effects from cocaine at each dose tested."( The effects of lidocaine pretreatment on cocaine neurotoxicity and lethality in mice.
Goldfrank, LR; Heit, J; Hoffman, RS,
)
0.78
" The results of this study led us to conclude that the hematoma block with or without supplemental analgesia for the manipulation of ankle fractures was safe and effective and is a useful technique."( Hematoma block for ankle fractures: a safe and efficacious technique for manipulations.
Alioto, RJ; Furia, JP; Marquardt, JD, 1995
)
0.29
" This study establishes a possible basis for redefining the maximum safe dosage for lidocaine in human subjects."( Safe dosages of lidocaine for facial analgesia.
Bonanno, PC, 1994
)
0.86
" large, bilateral or strangulated herniae, or those in obese patients) without risk of exposing patients to lignocaine concentrations which may cause toxic side effects."( Evaluation of the safety of inguinal hernia repair in the elderly using lignocaine infiltration anaesthesia.
Hung, P; Karatassas, A; Morris, RG; Slavotinek, AH; Walsh, D, 1993
)
0.29
"Topical application of a 30% lidocaine cream as used in this study may be a safe and efficacious anesthetic for circumcision."( Safety and efficacy of a topical anesthetic for neonatal circumcision.
Claflin, KS; Erenberg, A; Jackson, EM; Leff, RD; Rasmussen, LB; Weatherstone, KB, 1993
)
0.58
" This resulted in toxic serum lidocaine levels (8."( Seizures due to lidocaine toxicity in a child during cardiac catheterization.
Coe, JY; Robertson, M; Ryan, CA, 1993
)
0.92
" In this study, it was shown that the safe and effective net application dose of lidocaine for the surgery may be within the range of 127 to 260 mg."( Safe and effective topical application dose of lidocaine for surgery with laryngomicroscopy.
Iga, T; Ito, K; Kaga, K; Kotaki, H; Mitomi, N; Sawada, Y; Tayama, N; Tezuka, K, 1996
)
0.78
"We evaluated the electrophysiological mechanisms of adverse effects of class I antiarrhythmic drugs (cibenzoline in seven patients, pilsicainide in two, and disopyramide in two, and procainamide in three) in the induction of orthodromic atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia (AVRT)."( Electrophysiologic mechanisms of adverse effects of class I antiarrhythmic drugs (cibenzoline, pilsicainide, disopyramide, procainamide) in induction of atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia.
Fujiki, A; Inoue, H; Tani, M; Yoshida, S, 1996
)
0.29
" The potential for toxic effects from such use has not been studied in a controlled manner."( Ocular toxicity following topical application of anesthetic cream to the eyelid skin.
Cohen, RG; Hartstein, M; Ladav, M; Lahav, M; Woog, JJ, 1996
)
0.29
" After 1 hour of treatment, the eyelid and anterior segment were examined for evidence of adverse reaction."( Ocular toxicity following topical application of anesthetic cream to the eyelid skin.
Cohen, RG; Hartstein, M; Ladav, M; Lahav, M; Woog, JJ, 1996
)
0.29
"No significant adverse effects were noted on external lid and anterior segment examination."( Ocular toxicity following topical application of anesthetic cream to the eyelid skin.
Cohen, RG; Hartstein, M; Ladav, M; Lahav, M; Woog, JJ, 1996
)
0.29
" The external application of EMLA cream may be safe in the periorbital region."( Ocular toxicity following topical application of anesthetic cream to the eyelid skin.
Cohen, RG; Hartstein, M; Ladav, M; Lahav, M; Woog, JJ, 1996
)
0.29
" Medical conditions such as congestive heart failure and diminished hepatic function or concomitant use of lidocaine analogs may predispose patients to the toxic side effects of locally administered lidocaine."( Systemic absorption and toxicity from topically administered lidocaine during transesophageal echocardiography.
Coccio, EB; Coulter, LJ; Miller, GL; Rama, PR; Sharma, SC,
)
0.59
" The authors conclude that the lidocaine patches used in this study are effective and safe in reducing needle insertion pain in adults."( Analgesic efficacy and safety of an intraoral lidocaine patch.
Cooper, SA; Feldman, RS; Hersh, EV; Houpt, MI; Levin, LM; Wolff, MS, 1996
)
0.84
" These findings suggest that the serum toxic level of lidocaine in children is different from that in adults, and that careful observation and appropriate management for the children with lidocaine therapy should be necessary, even though the serum level of lidocaine ranges within the therapeutic level."( [Efficacy and side effects of lidocaine by intravenous drip infusion in children with intractable seizures].
Aihara, M; Hatakeyama, K; Hinohara, Y; Kamiya, Y; Kanemura, H; Nakazawa, S; Sata, Y; Shimoda, C, 1997
)
0.83
"The safe upper limit of lidocaine dosage in tumescent anesthesia for liposuction has been reported to be 35 mg/kg."( Tumescent anesthesia with a lidocaine dose of 55 mg/kg is safe for liposuction.
Kageyama, N; Moy, RL; Ostad, A, 1996
)
0.89
"This study suggests that tumescent anesthesia with a total lidocaine dose of up to 55 mg/kg is safe for use in liposuction."( Tumescent anesthesia with a lidocaine dose of 55 mg/kg is safe for liposuction.
Kageyama, N; Moy, RL; Ostad, A, 1996
)
0.83
" It is relatively safe and useful in many other clinical settings."( Lidocaine-induced CNS toxicity--a case report.
Chiang, YY; Leung, HK; Lih, YW; Liu, CT; Tsai, TC; Tseng, KF, 1996
)
1.74
"Lidocaine-prilocaine cream is efficacious and safe for the prevention of pain from circumcision in neonates."( Efficacy and safety of lidocaine-prilocaine cream for pain during circumcision.
Ben-David, S; Craig, K; Koren, G; Mulligan, P; Rastogi, P; Shennan, A; Stevens, B; Taddio, A, 1997
)
2.05
" To conclude, promethazine hydrochloride appears to be a safe alternative to lignocaine hydrochloride for performing surgery under regional anaesthesia."( Efficacy and safety of promethazine hydrochloride as a local anaesthetic agent for inguinal hernia repair: a pilot study.
Chawla, R; Gupta, RL; Kumar, S,
)
0.13
" The central nervous system is the primary target for the toxic effect of LD in awake newborn pigs."( Lidocaine pharmacokinetics and toxicity in newborn pigs.
Haaland, K; Hoem, NO; Johannessen, SI; Satas, S; Sørensen, DR; Thoresen, M, 1997
)
1.74
" Proparacaine was statistically more toxic than were the others."( Corneal endothelial toxicity of topical anesthesia.
Judge, AJ; Lee, DA; Miller, KM; Najafi, K, 1997
)
0.3
"Sub-Tenon's anaesthesia is an efficient and safe anaesthetic technique."( Sub-Tenon's anaesthesia: an efficient and safe technique.
Auclin, FX; Boureau, CM; Chong Sit, DA; Roman, SJ; Ullern, MM, 1997
)
0.3
"No adverse clinical reaction and no histologic abnormality was observed in any of the nine groups after injection."( Toxicity of intraocular lidocaine and bupivacaine.
Liang, C; Peyman, GA; Sun, G, 1998
)
0.61
"To test the hypothesis that lidocaine prolongs the safe period of circulatory arrest during deep hypothermia."( Lidocaine prolongs the safe duration of circulatory arrest during deep hypothermia in dogs.
Du, M; Hu, X; Li, J; Ma, D; Ma, Q; Shan, G; Wang, D; Xie, D; Zhou, Y; Zhu, J, 1998
)
2.04
"In dogs lidocaine prolongs the safe duration of circulatory arrest during hypothermia."( Lidocaine prolongs the safe duration of circulatory arrest during deep hypothermia in dogs.
Du, M; Hu, X; Li, J; Ma, D; Ma, Q; Shan, G; Wang, D; Xie, D; Zhou, Y; Zhu, J, 1998
)
2.18
" The number of adverse reactions reported, particularly toxic reactions, are extraordinarily negligible."( Lidocaine toxicity.
Caiazzo, A; Maloney, P; Mehra, P, 1998
)
1.74
" This prospective study of 53 consecutive healthy patients undergoing liposuction using a superwet technique served to develop general guidelines for safe perioperative fluid management, especially in regard to large-volume aspirations."( Safety considerations and fluid resuscitation in liposuction: an analysis of 53 consecutive patients.
Adams, WP; Beran, SJ; Kenkel, JM; Klein, KW; Rohrich, RJ; Trott, SA, 1998
)
0.3
"5 g lidocaine-prilocaine cream to the heel under occlusion four times a day during 30 min is safe in preterm neonates."( Safety of lidocaine-prilocaine cream application four times a day in premature neonates: a pilot study.
Essink-Tebbes, CM; Hekster, YA; Liem, KD; van Dongen, RT; Wuis, EW, 1999
)
1.26
"Lidocaine is toxic in a dose dependent fashion to RGC in vitro."( Lidocaine toxicity to rat retinal ganglion cells.
Dreyer, EB; Freeman, EE; Grosskreutz, CL; Katowitz, WR, 1999
)
3.19
"Lidocaine is toxic to RGC both in vitro and in vivo."( Lidocaine toxicity to rat retinal ganglion cells.
Dreyer, EB; Freeman, EE; Grosskreutz, CL; Katowitz, WR, 1999
)
3.19
" The authors conclude that EMLA is safe but not efficacious for relieving pain from heel lance in preterm infants."( Management of pain from heel lance with lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream: is it safe and efficacious in preterm infants?
Aranda, J; Jack, A; Johnston, C; Koren, G; Narciso, J; Stevens, B; Stremler, R; Taddio, A, 1999
)
0.57
" The measured peak plasma concentration of lidocaine or prilocaine did not reach toxic levels in any patient."( The efficacy and safety of EMLA cream for awake fiberoptic endotracheal intubation.
Afshar, M; Cypel, D; Goldberg, ME; Gratz, I; Larijani, GE; Mandel, R; Mroz, L, 2000
)
0.57
"We describe a 3-year-old child with mollusca contagiosa whose caregiver applied a eutectic mixture of 5% lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA) in excessive amounts with the subsequent development of adverse reactions, including methemoglobinemia and hypoxemia."( Lidocaine and prilocaine toxicity in a patient receiving treatment for mollusca contagiosa.
Jackson, JB; Touma, S, 2001
)
1.97
" The overall incidence of adverse events in the combined studies was 22 percent for the articaine group and 20 percent for the lidocaine group."( Articaine hydrochloride: a study of the safety of a new amide local anesthetic.
Gagnon, S; Leblanc, D; Malamed, SF, 2001
)
0.52
"Articaine is a well-tolerated, safe and effective local anesthetic for use in clinical dentistry."( Articaine hydrochloride: a study of the safety of a new amide local anesthetic.
Gagnon, S; Leblanc, D; Malamed, SF, 2001
)
0.31
" Peribulbar block appears to be a safe and useful analgesic technique for paediatric ophthalmic surgery."( Safety and efficacy of peribulbar block as adjunct to general anaesthesia for paediatric ophthalmic surgery.
Deb, K; Dehran, M; Shende, D; Subramaniam, R; Tandon, R, 2001
)
0.31
" The studies selected had a sufficient number of geriatric and nongeriatric adults and a uniform, standardized pain stimulus (split-skin grafting), pain rating (visual analogue scale, verbal rating scale) and adverse event recording."( Split-skin grafting with lidocaine-prilocaine cream: A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety in geriatric versus nongeriatric patients.
Lillieborg, S; Wahlgren, CF, 2001
)
0.61
" The aim of this work is to determine whether lidocaine antagonized the toxic effect of the crude poison of Centruroides limpidus limpidus."( Lidocaine as antagonist of scorpion poison toxicity from Centruroides limpidus limpidus.
Jiménez-Ferrer, JE; Lozoya-Legorreta, X; Pérez-Torres, YY; Tortoriello-García, J,
)
1.83
" Lidocaine and prilocaine concentrations were below toxic levels; o-toluidine was not detected."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of EMLA in the treatment of postburn pruritus in pediatric patients: a pilot study.
Bch, MB; Clarke, HM; Hubley, P; Jacobson, S; Kopecky, EA; Koren, G; Palozzi, L,
)
1.04
"The adverse effects of local anesthetics associated with catecholamines upon the cardiovascular system, such as arterial pressure alterations and cardiac arrhythmias, have been highly discussed in pharmacological literature."( Norepinephrine prevents the adverse effects of lidocaine upon the heart. An experimental study in isolated guinea-pig hearts.
Coelho, AE; Garcia, KC; Gazola, R; Singi, G, 2001
)
0.57
" No consensus on subarachnoid administration of lidocaine has emerged, yet no alternative has been demonstrated to be safe and to offer similar pharmacological features (short latency, short duration of action and good muscle relaxation)."( [Neurotoxicity of intrathecal lidocaine].
Anadón Senac, P; Pavón, A,
)
0.68
" Clinical drug-related adverse events were reported during IM therapy in 14 patients (16."( Safety and local tolerability of intramuscularly administered ertapenem diluted in lidocaine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study versus intramuscular ceftriaxone.
Friedland, I; Jiang, Q; Legua, P; Lema, J; Moll, J; Woods, G, 2002
)
0.54
" Adverse effects were minor and disappeared prior to discharge from the emergency department."( Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of iontophoresis with lidocaine for dermal anesthesia in ED pediatric patients.
Jordan, P; Schultz, AA; Strout, TD; Worthing, B, 2002
)
0.56
"Iontophoresis with lidocaine is safe for use in young children."( Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of iontophoresis with lidocaine for dermal anesthesia in ED pediatric patients.
Jordan, P; Schultz, AA; Strout, TD; Worthing, B, 2002
)
0.89
"Intracameral lidocaine may be a safe and effective alternative anaesthesia method in trabeculectomy for uncomplicated primary open-angle glaucoma."( Intracameral lidocaine in trabeculectomy. A preliminary safety and efficacy study.
Lai, JS; Lam, DS; Tham, CC, 2002
)
1.05
" No systemic adverse events were judged to be related to the patches."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of continuously applied lidocaine patches 5%.
Alvarez, NA; Galer, BS; Gammaitoni, AR, 2002
)
0.57
" Fewer patients after levobupivacaine n=20 (7%) than after lignocaine n=7 (23%) or placebo n=5 (16%) experienced adverse events."( Safety and efficacy of levobupivacaine for postoperative pain relief after the surgical removal of impacted third molars: a comparison with lignocaine and adrenaline.
Coulthard, P; Gennery, BA; Rood, JP; Snowdon, AT, 2002
)
0.31
" The toxic reactions associated with an accidental overdose have been reported in pediatric cases."( Lidocaine toxicity during frequent viscous lidocaine use for painful tongue ulcer.
Kakiuchi, Y; Miyabe, M; Sato, S; Yamaguchi, H; Yamashita, S, 2002
)
1.76
" The most common adverse events generally involve mild skin reactions."( Safety and tolerability of the lidocaine patch 5%, a targeted peripheral analgesic: a review of the literature.
Alvarez, NA; Galer, BS; Gammaitoni, AR, 2003
)
0.6
"The 3 concentrations of viscoanesthetic solutions appeared to be safe to rabbit corneal endothelium."( Viscoanesthesia. Part I: toxicity to corneal endothelial cells in a rabbit model.
Apple, DJ; Izak, AM; Macky, TA; Pandey, SK; Trivedi, RH; Werner, L, 2003
)
0.32
" They have apparently safe cardiac safety profiles in both therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses, but recently the Federal Drug Administration has issued a caution regarding ziprasidone use in combination with other drugs that are known to prolong the QTc interval."( Cardiotoxicity associated with intentional ziprasidone and bupropion overdose.
Biswas, AK; Mayes, KL; Morris-Kukoski, CL; Zabrocki, LA, 2003
)
0.32
" Particular care should be taken when calculating the maximum safe dose for young children."( Lignocaine toxicity; a complication of local anaesthesia administered in the community.
Derbyshire, S; Donald, MJ, 2004
)
0.32
" The peak lidocaine plus monoethylglycinexylidide concentration was within safe limits in this group of subjects."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of lidocaine and monoethylglycinexylidide in liposuction: a microdialysis study.
Armstrong, VW; Brown, SA; Kenkel, JM; Lipschitz, AH; Luby, M; Oellerich, M; Rohrich, RJ; Shepherd, G; Streit, F, 2004
)
1.01
"Peri-prostatic injection of local anaesthetic is safe and reduces discomfort significantly, and should be routinely offered to patients."( Efficacy and safety peri-prostatic local anaesthetic injection in trans-rectal biopsy of the prostrate: a prospective randomised study.
Keane, PF; Lynch, TH; Mahendra, V; Nambirajan, T; Walsh, IK; Woolsey, S, 2004
)
0.32
" The primary outcome measure was reduction in ureteral stent symptoms, and the secondary outcome measure was the safety of intravesical instillation of each agent through assessment of drug-related adverse events."( Double-blind randomized controlled trial assessing the safety and efficacy of intravesical agents for ureteral stent symptoms after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.
Beiko, DT; Brock, GB; Denstedt, JD; Knudsen, BE; Nott, L; Pautler, SE; Razvi, H; Watterson, JD, 2004
)
0.32
" From our results, ketorolac appears to be the most effective intravesical agent in reducing stent-related patient discomfort, and we have established that intravesical instillation of ketorolac is safe in humans."( Double-blind randomized controlled trial assessing the safety and efficacy of intravesical agents for ureteral stent symptoms after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.
Beiko, DT; Brock, GB; Denstedt, JD; Knudsen, BE; Nott, L; Pautler, SE; Razvi, H; Watterson, JD, 2004
)
0.32
" Immediately following the procedure, the subjects, the investigator, and an independent observer rated pain intensity and adverse events were recorded."( Self-warming lidocaine/tetracaine patch effectively and safely induces local anesthesia during minor dermatologic procedures.
Berman, B; de Araujo, T; Flores, J; Pariser, D; Pariser, R; Ramirez, CC, 2005
)
0.7
"The pretreatment with nitrous oxide is a time effective and safe method for use at paediatric outpatient departments to reduce pain, facilitate venous cannulation, and thereby reduce the number of costly cancellations of planned procedures."( Nitrous oxide inhalation is a safe and effective way to facilitate procedures in paediatric outpatient departments.
Ekbom, K; Jakobsson, J; Marcus, C, 2005
)
0.33
" Neither anesthetic was systemically absorbed in any cat, and no adverse clinical signs were observed."( Adverse effects of EMLA (lidocaine/prilocaine) cream and efficacy for the placement of jugular catheters in hospitalized cats.
Gibbon, KJ; Kurian, JR; Strom, TL; Trepanier, LA; Wagner, KA, 2006
)
0.64
" A pilot study was conducted to assess acute toxic effects prior to undertaking further assessment of this drug."( Acute toxicity pilot evaluation of proliferol in rats and swine.
Dagenais, S; Haldeman, S; Kim, RC; Ogunseitan, O; Wooley, JR; Zaldivar, F,
)
0.13
" Information collected included: demographics, type of exposure, details of the exposure and adverse effects."( Lignocaine and chlorhexidine toxicity in children resulting from mouth paint ingestion: a bottling problem.
Balit, CR; Gilmore, SP; Isbister, GK; Lynch, AM; Murray, L, 2006
)
0.33
" No other adverse effects were reported."( Lignocaine and chlorhexidine toxicity in children resulting from mouth paint ingestion: a bottling problem.
Balit, CR; Gilmore, SP; Isbister, GK; Lynch, AM; Murray, L, 2006
)
0.33
"No major adverse effects occurred with lignocaine ingestions of less than 6 mg/kg and it would be appropriate to observe these patients at home."( Lignocaine and chlorhexidine toxicity in children resulting from mouth paint ingestion: a bottling problem.
Balit, CR; Gilmore, SP; Isbister, GK; Lynch, AM; Murray, L, 2006
)
0.33
"One-minute exposure to lidocaine 1% E or 2% E appears to be safe for cultured rabbit CECs, although longer exposures could cause time-dependent cytotoxicity, which should be considered in planning cataract or other ocular surgery."( Cytotoxicity of lidocaine or bupivacaine on corneal endothelial cells in a rabbit model.
Chang, YS; Tseng, SH; Tseng, SY; Wu, CL, 2006
)
0.99
" While the use of topical anesthesia is generally regarded as safe and effective, recent concern about lidocaine toxicity from the use of compounded mixtures of lidocaine for cosmetic procedures has been reported."( Safety of occluded 4% liposomal lidocaine cream.
Nestor, MS,
)
0.63
" Although the use of topical lidocaine is considered relatively safe, instances of cardiotoxic and neurotoxic adverse events have been reported to occur."( Systemic toxicity from topically applied lidocaine in conjunction with fractional photothermolysis.
Fincher, EF; Marra, DE; Moy, RL; Yip, D, 2006
)
0.89
" The results of laboratory studies confirmed serum lidocaine levels within the toxic range."( Systemic toxicity from topically applied lidocaine in conjunction with fractional photothermolysis.
Fincher, EF; Marra, DE; Moy, RL; Yip, D, 2006
)
0.85
" However, gastroscopy proved to be a safe procedure both with and without sedation."( Sedation, topical pharyngeal anesthesia and cardiorespiratory safety during gastroscopy.
Hartikainen, J; Heikkinen, M; Julkunen, R; Laitinen, T; Mattila, M; Ristikankare, M; Wang, SX,
)
0.13
"5% [corrected] anesthesia was safe and effective in phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation."( Safety and efficacy of topical anesthesia combined with a lower concentration of intracameral lidocaine in phacoemulsification: paired human eye study.
Chuang, LH; Ku, WC; Lai, CC; Yang, KJ; Yeung, L, 2007
)
0.56
"Sedation-free intradetrusor botulinum toxin-A injection using intravesical lidocaine and flexible endoscopy is a well tolerated and safe procedure to perform in an office setting."( Safety and tolerability of sedation-free flexible cystoscopy for intradetrusor botulinum toxin-A injection.
Barboglio, P; Cohen, BL; Gousse, A; Rivera, R, 2007
)
0.57
" Adverse events were recorded in 9 cases (0."( Safety and effectiveness of intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier block) for outpatient management of forearm trauma.
Mohr, B, 2006
)
0.33
" Safety evaluation was performed with respect to plasma concentrations of lidocaine, vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG), physical findings and adverse events."( Proof of systemic safety of a lidocaine ointment in the treatment of patients with anorectal pain.
Mazur, D; Schlegelmilch, R; Seiler, D; Vens-Cappell, B; Zimmermann, J, 2007
)
0.86
"5 microg/ml) as well as by an order of magnitude below toxic concentrations (5 microg/ml)."( Proof of systemic safety of a lidocaine ointment in the treatment of patients with anorectal pain.
Mazur, D; Schlegelmilch, R; Seiler, D; Vens-Cappell, B; Zimmermann, J, 2007
)
0.63
"Repeated anorectal administration of a 5% lidocaine ointment proved to be safe with respect to systemic plasma concentrations of lidocaine and vital signs."( Proof of systemic safety of a lidocaine ointment in the treatment of patients with anorectal pain.
Mazur, D; Schlegelmilch, R; Seiler, D; Vens-Cappell, B; Zimmermann, J, 2007
)
0.89
"The current study was conducted to determine whether topical anesthesia with oral sedation and without an anesthetist present in the operating room is a safe and cost-effective strategy for low-risk patients undergoing cataract surgery."( Safety of cataract surgery under topical anesthesia with oral sedation without anesthetic monitoring.
Rocha, G; Turner, C, 2007
)
0.34
" Oral sedation was provided by lorazepam, and an anesthetist was available to manage any medical adverse events."( Safety of cataract surgery under topical anesthesia with oral sedation without anesthetic monitoring.
Rocha, G; Turner, C, 2007
)
0.34
" No medical adverse events were reported in 454 cases (84."( Safety of cataract surgery under topical anesthesia with oral sedation without anesthetic monitoring.
Rocha, G; Turner, C, 2007
)
0.34
"Topical anesthesia appears to be a safe alternative to injection anesthesia without many of the disadvantages of the latter and may be preferable in carefully selected patients."( Safety of cataract surgery under topical anesthesia with oral sedation without anesthetic monitoring.
Rocha, G; Turner, C, 2007
)
0.34
" Specular microscopy performed at 30 days postoperatively showed a significantly greater loss of endothelial cells with the use of VisThesia, suggesting that the 1% lidocaine concentration used in VisThesia may be toxic to corneal endothelial cells."( Safety and efficacy of two ocular anesthetic methods for phacoemulsification: topical anesthesia and viscoanesthesia (VisThesia).
Herasymyuk, O; Ouled-Moussa, R; Perone, JM; Popovici, A; Reynders, S,
)
0.33
"From this preliminary study, intravenous injection of lidocaine seems to be safe and effective in controlling intraocular pressure and eliminating symptoms in acute PACG."( Efficacy and safety of intravenous injection of lidocaine in the treatment of acute primary angle-closure glaucoma: a pilot study.
Dong, XD; Jin, X; Qin, Q; Qu, J; Xue, A; Zhao, Y, 2007
)
0.84
" This may indicate that certain drugs have a minimum concentration level that must be reached before the cells experience apoptosis from the toxic levels."( Novel tissue engineered tubular heart tissue for in vitro pharmaceutical toxicity testing.
Comer, GR; Franchini, JL; Propst, JT; Yost, MJ, 2007
)
0.34
"This study was conducted to determine whether short-term exposures to 1% and 2% lidocaine are toxic to articular chondrocytes, whether this is due to pH, and whether an intact articular surface is protective."( Lidocaine exhibits dose- and time-dependent cytotoxic effects on bovine articular chondrocytes in vitro.
Chu, CR; Karpie, JC, 2007
)
2.01
"To determine anesthetic profiles and adverse events in practice of ambulatory anesthesia for elective surgery in different levels of hospitals across Thailand."( The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI study) of ambulatory anesthesia: II. Anesthetic profiles and adverse events.
Chau-in, W; Punjasawadwong, Y; Srisawasdi, S; Taratarnkoolwatana, K; Vasinanukorn, M; Werawatganon, T, 2008
)
0.35
" Other adverse events included awareness (1."( The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI study) of ambulatory anesthesia: II. Anesthetic profiles and adverse events.
Chau-in, W; Punjasawadwong, Y; Srisawasdi, S; Taratarnkoolwatana, K; Vasinanukorn, M; Werawatganon, T, 2008
)
0.35
"The incidence of major adverse events was low in ambulatory anesthesia for elective surgery when compared to the incidence in general surgical population."( The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI study) of ambulatory anesthesia: II. Anesthetic profiles and adverse events.
Chau-in, W; Punjasawadwong, Y; Srisawasdi, S; Taratarnkoolwatana, K; Vasinanukorn, M; Werawatganon, T, 2008
)
0.35
"General anesthesia produced physiological perturbations, exacerbated local anesthetic-induced cardiovascular depression, and changed the pharmacokinetics of toxic doses of local anesthetics."( The effects of general anesthesia on the central nervous and cardiovascular system toxicity of local anesthetics.
Copeland, SE; Gu, XQ; Ladd, LA; Mather, LE, 2008
)
0.35
" We investigated the hypotheses that these drugs (A) are less neurotoxic than the prototype local anesthetic, lidocaine (B) are selectively toxic for subcategories of dorsal root ganglion neurons and (C) induce activation of either p38 MAPK or related enzymes, such as the c-jun terminal N-kinase (JNK) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)."( In vitro, inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways protects against bupivacaine- and ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity.
Colvin, HP; Gerner, P; Haller, I; Klimaschewski, L; Lang, L; Lirk, P; Tomaselli, B, 2008
)
0.56
" The blood pressure and heart rate change, neural reaction and side effect of 2 groups were observed."( [Efficacy and safety of 3% mepivacaine hydrochloride injection for oral local anesthesia].
Cao, D; Ding, S; Wu, YN; Zhu, YQ, 2008
)
0.35
"3% mepivacaine has quick onset, ideal anesthetic effect and little side effect on cardiovascular system."( [Efficacy and safety of 3% mepivacaine hydrochloride injection for oral local anesthesia].
Cao, D; Ding, S; Wu, YN; Zhu, YQ, 2008
)
0.35
"We conclude that thyroidectomy under local anaesthesia is a safe procedure in experienced hands at rural settings with inadequate facilities for general anaesthesia."( Thyroidectomy under local anaesthesia: how safe?
Akwaras, AL; Dakum, NK; Embu, HY; Misauno, MA; Ojo, EO; Sule, AZ; Ugwu, BT; Yilkudi, MG, 2008
)
0.35
" The most important adverse event was abdominal pain."( TACE of liver metastases from colorectal cancer adopting irinotecan-eluting beads: beneficial effect of palliative intra-arterial lidocaine and post-procedure supportive therapy on the control of side effects.
Aliberti, C; Ballardini, PL; Benea, G; Cantore, M; Fiorentini, G; Mambrini, A; Montagnani, F,
)
0.34
" Patients administering lidocaine plaster experienced fewer drug-related adverse events (3."( Efficacy and safety of 5% lidocaine (lignocaine) medicated plaster in comparison with pregabalin in patients with postherpetic neuralgia and diabetic polyneuropathy: interim analysis from an open-label, two-stage adaptive, randomized, controlled trial.
Baron, R; Binder, A; Leijon, G; Mayoral, V; Serpell, M; Steigerwald, I, 2009
)
0.96
"After 4 weeks, 5% lidocaine medicated plaster treatment was associated with similar levels of analgesia in patients with PHN or DPN but substantially fewer frequent adverse events than pregabalin."( Efficacy and safety of 5% lidocaine (lignocaine) medicated plaster in comparison with pregabalin in patients with postherpetic neuralgia and diabetic polyneuropathy: interim analysis from an open-label, two-stage adaptive, randomized, controlled trial.
Baron, R; Binder, A; Leijon, G; Mayoral, V; Serpell, M; Steigerwald, I, 2009
)
0.99
" Drug-related adverse events occurred in 13."( Topical 5% lidocaine (lignocaine) medicated plaster treatment for post-herpetic neuralgia: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational efficacy and safety trial.
Baron, R; Binder, A; Bösl, I; Bruxelle, J; Hans, G; Rogers, P, 2009
)
0.74
"This study adds to a growing body of evidence that the 5% lidocaine medicated plaster can be considered a valuable treatment option for patients with PHN, providing beneficial effects on pain, allodynia, quality of life and sleep, with minimal adverse effects."( Topical 5% lidocaine (lignocaine) medicated plaster treatment for post-herpetic neuralgia: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational efficacy and safety trial.
Baron, R; Binder, A; Bösl, I; Bruxelle, J; Hans, G; Rogers, P, 2009
)
0.99
"Periprostatic plexus blocked with lidocaine does not offer advantages respect to meperidine, despite the fact that this is a safe method that does not increase the number of complications."( [Comparative study between analgesic efficacy and safety of meperidine compared with lidocaine periprostatic infiltration in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy].
Arlandis Guzmán, S; Bahílo Mateu, P; Bango García, V; Di Capua Sacoto, C; Jiménez Cruz, JF; Luján Marco, S; Ramírez Backhaus, M; Trassierra Villa, M, 2009
)
0.86
" Safety evaluation included adverse events (AEs), drug-related AEs (DRAEs), and withdrawal due to AEs."( Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster and pregabalin in post-herpetic neuralgia and diabetic polyneuropathy.
Baron, R; Binder, A; Leijon, G; Mayoral, V; Serpell, M; Steigerwald, I, 2009
)
0.6
"In patients with PHN and painful DPN failing to respond to monotherapy, combination therapy with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster and pregabalin provides additional clinically relevant pain relief and is safe and well-tolerated."( Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster and pregabalin in post-herpetic neuralgia and diabetic polyneuropathy.
Baron, R; Binder, A; Leijon, G; Mayoral, V; Serpell, M; Steigerwald, I, 2009
)
0.82
" No patients were admitted to hospital due to adverse events associated with hydrodistension."( Hydrodistension under local anesthesia for patients with suspected painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis: safety, diagnostic potential and therapeutic efficacy.
Aihara, K; Fujimoto, K; Hirao, Y; Hirayama, A; Tanaka, N; Yoshida, K, 2009
)
0.35
"Cystoscopy with hydrodistension under local anesthesia provides a simple and safe method for differential diagnosis and has some therapeutic efficacy in patients with suspected PBS/IC."( Hydrodistension under local anesthesia for patients with suspected painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis: safety, diagnostic potential and therapeutic efficacy.
Aihara, K; Fujimoto, K; Hirao, Y; Hirayama, A; Tanaka, N; Yoshida, K, 2009
)
0.35
"Local lidocaine injections into the submucosal layer were safe when administered during ESDs performed on EGC patients under sedation."( Pilot study to assess the safety of local lidocaine injections during endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.
Gotoda, T; Ikehara, H; Kiriyama, S; Mashimo, Y; Nishimoto, F; Oda, I, 2009
)
1.1
"'Healer' is a promising effective and safe line of treatment in acute and chronic anal fissure."( Study of efficacy and safety of a new local cream ('healer') in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a prospective, randomized, single-blind, comparative study.
Abdel Salaam, M; Yakoot, M,
)
0.13
" Data on the requirement for additional pleural procedures, adverse events and survival were collected."( Efficacy and safety of iodopovidone pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusions.
de Oliveira, SF; Neto, JD; Terra, RM; Vianna, SP, 2010
)
0.36
" Adverse events occurred after 11 (18%) pleurodesis procedures."( Efficacy and safety of iodopovidone pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusions.
de Oliveira, SF; Neto, JD; Terra, RM; Vianna, SP, 2010
)
0.36
"Inclusion was limited to: (1) randomized controlled trials in patients requiring non-complex routine dental treatments; (2) interventions comparing 4% articaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) with 2% lignocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) for maxillary and mandibular infiltrations and block anaesthesia; and (3) with principal outcome measures of anaesthetic success, post-injection adverse events or post-injection pain."( The efficacy and safety of articaine versus lignocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis.
Katyal, V, 2010
)
0.36
" In addition, both drugs appear to have similar adverse effect profiles."( The efficacy and safety of articaine versus lignocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis.
Katyal, V, 2010
)
0.36
" In the present study, safety studies employing in situ toad palate model and in vivo rat nasal mucosa model showed that compared with LID nasal spray, LID nasal gel was less toxic to mucocilia."( Hydrophilic nasal gel of lidocaine hydrochloride. 2nd communication: Improved bioavailability and brain delivery in rats with low ciliotoxicity.
Feng, L; Hu, KL; Jiang, XG; Mei, N, 2009
)
0.66
" The onset of toxic manifestations (seizure, dysrhythmia, and cardiac arrest) was recorded, and then the doses of local anesthetics were calculated."( Effects of mixture of lidocaine and ropivacaine at different concentrations on the central nervous system and cardiovascular toxicity in rats.
Bo, YL; Li, HB; Li, WZ; Wan, QX, 2010
)
0.68
"The adverse effects of local anesthetics (LAs) on wound healing at surgical sites have been suggested, and may be related to their cytotoxicity."( Bupivacaine causes cytotoxicity in mouse C2C12 myoblast cells: involvement of ERK and Akt signaling pathways.
Chang, YC; Gan, Y; Hibner, M; Huang, Y; Ma, FX; Maurice, JM, 2010
)
0.36
" Anti-proliferation and cell death with concomitant apoptosis mediated by bupivacaine may offer an explanation for its adverse effects in vivo (eg slowing wound healing at the surgical sites)."( Bupivacaine causes cytotoxicity in mouse C2C12 myoblast cells: involvement of ERK and Akt signaling pathways.
Chang, YC; Gan, Y; Hibner, M; Huang, Y; Ma, FX; Maurice, JM, 2010
)
0.36
"In 2001, we reported a novel technique for pediatric circumcision that has proved to be fast, reliable, and safe during the past 4 years, with good cosmetic results."( Adult template circumcision: a prospective, randomized, patient-blinded, comparative study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a novel circumcision device.
Decastro, B; Gurski, J; Peterson, A, 2010
)
0.36
"The use of the adult circumcision template appears to be a reliable and safe method of circumcision that significantly reduces the operative time."( Adult template circumcision: a prospective, randomized, patient-blinded, comparative study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a novel circumcision device.
Decastro, B; Gurski, J; Peterson, A, 2010
)
0.36
" Although the lidocaine serum levels and peaks after injection of tumescent anesthesia in the trunk were shown to be safe even when used in high doses, the levels after use of less dilute (1% lidocaine) solutions for facial cancer surgery have not been described."( Safety of peak serum lidocaine concentration after Mohs micrographic surgery: a prospective cohort study.
Alam, M; Havey, J; Rademaker, A; Ricci, D; West, DP; Witherspoon, J, 2010
)
1.04
" Because no toxic levels were detected, it was not possible to measure sustained high lidocaine levels."( Safety of peak serum lidocaine concentration after Mohs micrographic surgery: a prospective cohort study.
Alam, M; Havey, J; Rademaker, A; Ricci, D; West, DP; Witherspoon, J, 2010
)
0.9
"Lidocaine use during Mohs micrographic surgery does not appear to result in serum lidocaine levels approaching toxic levels even when relatively high total lidocaine doses are used."( Safety of peak serum lidocaine concentration after Mohs micrographic surgery: a prospective cohort study.
Alam, M; Havey, J; Rademaker, A; Ricci, D; West, DP; Witherspoon, J, 2010
)
2.12
" An understanding of structure-activity relationships (SARs) of chemicals can make a significant contribution to the identification of potential toxic effects early in the drug development process and aid in avoiding such problems."( Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
Fisk, L; Greene, N; Naven, RT; Note, RR; Patel, ML; Pelletier, DJ, 2010
)
0.36
" Adverse events were recorded."( Safety of lidocaine 15% and prilocaine 5% topical ointment used as local anesthesia for intense pulsed light treatment.
Carruthers, JA; Carruthers, JD; Mordaunt, J; Oliff, HS; Poirier, J; Schreiber, WE, 2010
)
0.76
" No adverse events related to systemic toxicity were observed or reported to the nurse."( Safety of lidocaine 15% and prilocaine 5% topical ointment used as local anesthesia for intense pulsed light treatment.
Carruthers, JA; Carruthers, JD; Mordaunt, J; Oliff, HS; Poirier, J; Schreiber, WE, 2010
)
0.76
"To determine whether there are differences in the adverse effect profile between 1, 2 and 5% Lidocaine when used for occipital nerve blocks (ONB) in patients with occipital neuralgia."( Adverse effect profile of lidocaine injections for occipital nerve block in occipital neuralgia.
Sahai-Srivastava, S; Subhani, D, 2010
)
0.88
" 80% of these doctors were unable to calculate the maximum dose of lignocaine 1% for an 80 kg man, and nearly one-third would administer a toxic dose."( Local anaesthetic toxicity: are we prepared for the consequences in the Emergency Department?
Cooper, BR; Griffiths, JR; Moll, T, 2010
)
0.36
" The lack of knowledge amongst the more junior staff, as demonstrated by this project, highlights failings in teaching the basics of safe practices in the ED."( Local anaesthetic toxicity: are we prepared for the consequences in the Emergency Department?
Cooper, BR; Griffiths, JR; Moll, T, 2010
)
0.36
"The development of safe and effective local anesthetic agents has possibly been the most important advancement in dental science to occur in the last century."( Local anesthetics: pharmacology and toxicity.
Hersh, EV; Moore, PA, 2010
)
0.36
" Stress significantly increased the latency period for the first tonic-clonic seizure induced by a toxic dose of both lidocaine and articaine (P < ."( Effect of PaCO2 and PaO2 on lidocaine and articaine toxicity.
Barcelos, KC; Cabral, AM; Furtado, DP; Haas, DA; Ramacciato, JC, 2010
)
0.86
" A total of 383 patients completed the Patient Global Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction scale and measures of pain, interference with physical and emotional functioning, sleep interference, and adverse events."( Treatment satisfaction in osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain: the role of pain, physical and emotional functioning, sleep, and adverse events.
Dworkin, RH; Galer, BS; Gammaitoni, AR; Gould, E; Jensen, MP; Jones, BA; Xiang, Q, 2011
)
0.37
" Therefore, we hypothesized that the high toxicity of aliphatic amines in algae is a toxicokinetic effect caused by speciation and not a toxicodynamic effect caused by a specific mode of toxic action."( The pH-dependent toxicity of basic pharmaceuticals in the green algae Scenedesmus vacuolatus can be explained with a toxicokinetic ion-trapping model.
Escher, BI; Neuwoehner, J, 2011
)
0.37
"Ideally, topical anesthetics should provide rapid analgesic action without causing toxic blood levels of lidocaine or other side effects."( Safety and efficacy of a rapid-acting topical 4% lidocaine gel in a unique drug delivery system.
Baumann, LS; Bell, M; Elsaie, ML; Figueras, K; Grunebaum, L; Jablonka, E; Murdock, J, 2010
)
0.83
" Patients were monitored for at least 24 hours without adverse signs or symptoms that required fluid resuscitation, blood transfusions, or interventional treatments for lidocaine side effects or toxicity."( Water-assisted liposuction for body contouring and lipoharvesting: safety and efficacy in 41 consecutive patients.
Sasaki, GH, 2011
)
0.56
" Each result showed that bupivacaine was the most toxic of the three local anaesthetics."( Comparison of the cytotoxic effects of bupivacaine, lidocaine, and mepivacaine in equine articular chondrocytes.
Choi, SH; Hong, G; Kim, G; Park, J; Sutradhar, BC, 2011
)
0.62
"To add to the evidence base for safe and effective paediatric conscious sedation techniques in primary dental care."( The safety and efficacy of using a concentrated intranasal midazolam formulation for paediatric dental sedation.
Wood, M, 2011
)
0.37
"In selected cases intranasal sedation provides a safe and effective alternative for dental GA in short invasive procedures limited to one or two quadrants in children."( The safety and efficacy of using a concentrated intranasal midazolam formulation for paediatric dental sedation.
Wood, M, 2011
)
0.37
" We also observed animals for electrocardiographic evidence of toxic effects on cardiac automaticity, conductivity, and rhythmicity."( A comparison of the systemic toxicity of lidocaine versus its quaternary derivative QX-314 in mice.
Cheung, HM; Lee, SM; MacLeod, BA; Ries, CR; Schwarz, SK, 2011
)
0.64
"The study included data sets of annual sales of local anesthetics (from 1995 through 2007), 292 reports to the Danish Medicines Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark, of adverse reactions to local anesthetic drugs, and a clinical sample of 115 patients with NSD associated with local anesthetics."( Trigeminal nerve injury associated with injection of local anesthetics: needle lesion or neurotoxicity?
Ersbøll, BK; Hillerup, S; Jensen, RH, 2011
)
0.37
"Tumescent liposuction under local anesthesia is a safe method, providing it is performed by an experienced surgeon and the guidelines of care for liposuction are strictly followed."( Safety of tumescent liposuction under local anesthesia in a series of 4,380 patients.
Boeni, R, 2011
)
0.37
"Human neuroblastoma cells and primary rat astrocytes were incubated for 24 hrs with lidocaine at a toxic concentration alone and in combination with morphine, sufentanil, clonidine, epinephrine, neostigmine, ketamine, and midazolam."( The influence of adjuvants used in regional anesthesia on lidocaine-induced neurotoxicity in vitro.
Bauer, I; Braun, S; Hermanns, H; Hollmann, MW; Kremer, D; Küry, P; Stevens, MF; Werdehausen, R,
)
0.6
" However, recent studies have confirmed the toxic effect of lidocaine on ganglion cells."( Cataract surgery complications: an in vitro model of toxic effects of ropivacaine and lidocaine.
Nebbioso, M; Pescosolido, N; Scarsella, G; Tafani, M, 2011
)
0.83
"Our in vitro studies confirm that ropivacaine is less toxic than lidocaine to these cells."( Cataract surgery complications: an in vitro model of toxic effects of ropivacaine and lidocaine.
Nebbioso, M; Pescosolido, N; Scarsella, G; Tafani, M, 2011
)
0.83
" The rate of adverse events with conscious sedation has not been previously assessed in the interventional spine procedure setting."( Adverse events of conscious sedation in ambulatory spine procedures.
Marín, DR; Schaufele, MK; Simmons, AC; Tate, JL, 2011
)
0.37
"The goal of this study was to determine the rate of adverse events when using conscious sedation in the ambulatory interventional spine setting."( Adverse events of conscious sedation in ambulatory spine procedures.
Marín, DR; Schaufele, MK; Simmons, AC; Tate, JL, 2011
)
0.37
"The rate and type of adverse events were analyzed and compared between those who received conscious sedation with local anesthesia and those who received local anesthesia alone."( Adverse events of conscious sedation in ambulatory spine procedures.
Marín, DR; Schaufele, MK; Simmons, AC; Tate, JL, 2011
)
0.37
" Of these cases, 66 immediate adverse events (5."( Adverse events of conscious sedation in ambulatory spine procedures.
Marín, DR; Schaufele, MK; Simmons, AC; Tate, JL, 2011
)
0.37
"The findings of this study suggest that mild to moderate conscious sedation in interventional spine procedures is associated with low rates of adverse events when established protocols are followed."( Adverse events of conscious sedation in ambulatory spine procedures.
Marín, DR; Schaufele, MK; Simmons, AC; Tate, JL, 2011
)
0.37
" The WOMAC scale was applied at 4 weeks and adverse events were recorded."( Safety and efficacy of methylprednisolone infiltration in anserine syndrome treatment.
Esquivel-Valerio, JA; Galarza-Delgado, DÁ; Garza-Elizondo, MA; Negrete-López, R; Vega-Morales, D,
)
0.13
" The incidence of adverse events did not show any differences either."( Safety and efficacy of methylprednisolone infiltration in anserine syndrome treatment.
Esquivel-Valerio, JA; Galarza-Delgado, DÁ; Garza-Elizondo, MA; Negrete-López, R; Vega-Morales, D,
)
0.13
"Our data show that GON infiltration is a valuable and safe option in the clinical setting to treat patients suffering from cluster headache, especially for the episodic form of the disorder."( Efficacy and safety of 121 injections of the greater occipital nerve in episodic and chronic cluster headache.
Gantenbein, AR; Lutz, NJ; Riederer, F; Sándor, PS, 2012
)
0.38
" A 30-minute exposure to lidocaine alone was significantly toxic to the tenocytes in a dose-dependent manner, but a 30-minute exposure to ropivacaine or dexamethasone alone was not significantly toxic."( A comparison of lidocaine, ropivacaine and dexamethasone toxicity on bovine tenocytes in culture.
Feeley, BT; Kim, HT; Laron, D; Liu, X; Manzano, G; Pattnaik, T; Piper, SL, 2012
)
1.03
" The most frequently reported adverse events in both groups were associated with nasal discomfort."( Intranasal ketorolac tromethamine (SPRIX(R)) containing 6% of lidocaine (ROX-828) for acute treatment of migraine: safety and efficacy data from a phase II clinical trial.
Bregman, D; Färkkila, M; Fenzl, E; Pfaffenrath, V, 2012
)
0.62
" Safety parameters (clinical examination, skin evaluation, laboratory) and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at regular visits."( Safety and efficacy outcomes of long-term treatment up to 4 years with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia.
Baron, R; Buchheister, B; Hans, G; Kapanadze, S; Sabatowski, R; Tacken, I, 2012
)
0.61
" Drug-related adverse events (DRAEs) were reported in 19 of 102 patients, mainly mild to moderate localized skin reactions."( Safety and efficacy outcomes of long-term treatment up to 4 years with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia.
Baron, R; Buchheister, B; Hans, G; Kapanadze, S; Sabatowski, R; Tacken, I, 2012
)
0.61
" Thorough preoperative patient evaluation, detailed informed consent, and perioperative care delivered in a safe environment can contribute to improved safety in plastic surgery."( Patient safety in plastic surgery.
Tabbal, GN; Trussler, AP, 2012
)
0.38
" A survey questionnaire inquiring about adverse reactions and the effectiveness of nebulized lidocaine was developed and administered to these individuals after the nebulized lidocaine trial."( Long-term safety of nebulized lidocaine for adults with difficult-to-control chronic cough: a case series.
Hahn, PY; Keogh, KA; Lim, KG; Morgenthaler, TI; Olson, EJ; Rank, MA, 2013
)
0.9
" Of the patients who used nebulized lidocaine (93% of survey responders), 43% reported an adverse event."( Long-term safety of nebulized lidocaine for adults with difficult-to-control chronic cough: a case series.
Hahn, PY; Keogh, KA; Lim, KG; Morgenthaler, TI; Olson, EJ; Rank, MA, 2013
)
0.95
" No serious adverse effects occurred while providing symptomatic control in 49% of patients."( Long-term safety of nebulized lidocaine for adults with difficult-to-control chronic cough: a case series.
Hahn, PY; Keogh, KA; Lim, KG; Morgenthaler, TI; Olson, EJ; Rank, MA, 2013
)
0.68
" After 5 g XJ was applied to the patients, their level of lidocaine in blood was reduced to within the safe zone, and no undesirable effects were observed."( [Efficacy and safety of lidocaine hydrochloride jelly for the treatment of pain caused by breast cancer metastases to the skin].
Enomoto, T; Kikuchi, M; Kosaka, Y; Kuranami, M; Nishimiya, H; Sengoku, N; Waraya, M; Watanabe, M, 2012
)
0.93
" The patient's central nervous system symptoms were mild and transient but remind us that to avoid adverse side effects, orally administered drugs with fairly high hepatic extraction ratio given to patients with chronic liver disease need to be given in reduced dosages."( Even 'safe' medications need to be administered with care.
Dill, C; Gambetta, R; Howland, MA; Lutwak, N, 2013
)
0.39
"To study the efficacy and safety of lidocaine in newborns with perinatal asphyxia during moderate hypothermia, and to develop an effective and safe dosing regimen."( Anticonvulsant treatment of asphyxiated newborns under hypothermia with lidocaine: efficacy, safety and dosing.
de Vries, LS; Egberts, AC; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, AD; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van den Broek, MP; van Straaten, HL, 2013
)
0.9
" Previous studies have shown that the commonly used drugs lidocaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine can be toxic to human chondrocytes."( Cytotoxicity of local anesthetics on human mesenchymal stem cells.
Dang, AC; Kim, HT; Kuo, AC; Rahnama, R; Wang, M, 2013
)
0.63
"79), and 2% lidocaine was found to be significantly more toxic than all doses of bupivacaine and ropivacaine."( Cytotoxicity of local anesthetics on human mesenchymal stem cells.
Dang, AC; Kim, HT; Kuo, AC; Rahnama, R; Wang, M, 2013
)
0.77
" Since other studies have shown ropivacaine to be less toxic to chondrocytes than bupivacaine, ropivacaine may be a safer intra-articular anesthetic."( Cytotoxicity of local anesthetics on human mesenchymal stem cells.
Dang, AC; Kim, HT; Kuo, AC; Rahnama, R; Wang, M, 2013
)
0.39
"Overall, administration of KAI-1678 was generally safe and well tolerated."( The safety and efficacy of KAI-1678- an inhibitor of epsilon protein kinase C (εPKC)-versus lidocaine and placebo for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a crossover study design.
Bell, G; Cousins, MJ; Critchley, L; Huang, S; Pickthorn, K, 2013
)
0.61
" Secondary outcomes included vital sign changes, soft-tissue anesthesia, and treatment-emergent adverse events."( Safety and efficacy of a novel nasal spray for maxillary dental anesthesia.
Almubarak, SA; Ayoub, F; Ciancio, SG; Garlapo, DA; Hutcheson, MC; Pantera, CT; Pantera, EA; Sobieraj, BD, 2013
)
0.39
" Suspected adverse effects were seen in only one patient, who developed a transient bradycardia."( Efficacy and safety of lidocaine for treatment of neonatal seizures.
Ågren, J; Flink, R; Hellström-Westas, L; Lundqvist, M; Wickström, R, 2013
)
0.7
"Lidocaine has a moderate efficacy as second-line therapy following benzodiazepines for treating neonatal seizures and is not frequently associated with cardiovascular adverse effects."( Efficacy and safety of lidocaine for treatment of neonatal seizures.
Ågren, J; Flink, R; Hellström-Westas, L; Lundqvist, M; Wickström, R, 2013
)
2.14
"Bupivacaine is one of the most toxic local anesthetics but the mechanisms underlying its neurotoxicity are still unclear."( Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) repletion attenuates bupivacaine-induced neurotoxicity.
Lai, LY; Li, L; Xu, SY; Zheng, T; Zhou, SQ, 2013
)
0.39
"Data from this study demonstrate that topical anesthetic for facial rejuvenation can be enhanced with laser pretreatment while maintaining safe blood serum levels."( Topical lidocaine enhanced by laser pretreatment: a safe and effective method of analgesia for facial rejuvenation.
Kenkel, J; Oni, G; Rasko, Y, 2013
)
0.82
" In addition, the results showed that lidocaine was the most toxic of the three local anesthetics and that ropivacaine presented less cytotoxicity than lidocaine and bupivacaine."( Comparison of toxicity effects of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and lidocaine on rabbit intervertebral disc cells in vitro.
Cai, XY; Ding, F; Gao, F; Shao, ZW; Xie, M; Xiong, LM; Yang, SH, 2014
)
0.91
" The use of 10 ml 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 in patients with cardiac disease represent a safe anesthetic procedure."( The evaluation of perioperative safety of local anesthesia with lidocaine containing epinephrine in patients with ischemic heart disease.
Esmaeili, N; Fathi, HR; Ghazizadeh, S; Naseri, MH; Sadeghi, M; Sadrossadat, H; Sanatkar, M; Shoroughi, M, 2013
)
0.95
" There was no statistically significance in adverse events between two groups."( Efficacy and safety of bupivacaine versus lidocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Huang, Y; Liao, S; Su, N; Wang, H; Yang, S; Zhang, S, 2014
)
0.67
"5% lidocaine is fast-onset, very effective and safe in initiating epidural analgesia for early stage labor."( Low concentration lidocaine (0.5%) bolus epidurally can initiate fast-onset, effective and safe analgesia for early stage labor.
Liu, H; Rosinia, F; Yao, S, 2013
)
1.35
" Visual analogue scale (VAS), requirement of fentanyl and flurbiprofen, and the incidence of remifentanil-related adverse effects (respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, pruritus) were examined at 3 hourly intervals for 12 hours."( [Efficacy and safety of remifentanil-based regimen for postoperative pain management in abdominal surgery patients: a double-blind study with low-dose remifentanil infusion of 0.02 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)].
Hirano, H; Kaida, T; Machino, A; Nagasaka, Y; Shirasaki, R; Wakamatsu, M, 2014
)
0.4
" No adverse events including respiratory depression occurred throughout the study in both groups."( [Efficacy and safety of remifentanil-based regimen for postoperative pain management in abdominal surgery patients: a double-blind study with low-dose remifentanil infusion of 0.02 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)].
Hirano, H; Kaida, T; Machino, A; Nagasaka, Y; Shirasaki, R; Wakamatsu, M, 2014
)
0.4
"02 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) can safely be used without any serious adverse events, while it may not be enough for postoperative analgesia."( [Efficacy and safety of remifentanil-based regimen for postoperative pain management in abdominal surgery patients: a double-blind study with low-dose remifentanil infusion of 0.02 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)].
Hirano, H; Kaida, T; Machino, A; Nagasaka, Y; Shirasaki, R; Wakamatsu, M, 2014
)
0.4
" This may contribute to a further increase in the safe use of spinal anesthesia in the clinical setting."( Spinal anesthesia revisited: toxicity of new and old drugs and compounds.
Hampl, K; Steinfeldt, T; Wulf, H, 2014
)
0.4
"Ropivacaine is not safe when intrathecally administered with lidocaine at the concentrations used in this study."( Intrathecal lidocaine neurotoxicity: combination with bupivacaine and ropivacaine and effect of nerve growth factor.
Chen, W; Ding, X; Guo, Y; Zhao, G, 2014
)
1.02
"Lidocaine gel at concentrations from 2 to 12% induced similar anesthetic effect for IVTs, without adverse effects on cornea and conjunctiva."( Safety and efficacy of various concentrations of topical lidocaine gel for intravitreal injection.
Farah, ME; Grumann, A; Lorenzo, JC; Nunes, RP; Penha, FM; Rodrigues, EB; Shiroma, HF, 2014
)
2.09
" Controlled studies on the effect of lipid emulsion on toxic doses of local anaesthetics have not been performed in man."( Intravenous lipid emulsion given to volunteers does not affect symptoms of lidocaine brain toxicity.
Backman, JT; Haasio, J; Heinonen, JA; Litonius, E; Rosenberg, PH; Salmi, T; Tarkkila, P, 2015
)
0.65
" Of the evaluated anesthetics, ropivacaine is the least toxic in the clinically used concentration."( Cytotoxic effects of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and lidocaine on rotator cuff tenofibroblasts.
Hah, YS; Kim, JS; Kim, RJ; Lee, SJ; Nam, JB; Park, HB; Sung, CM, 2014
)
0.65
"Pain and potential adverse events (AE) remain challenges for patients being treated with calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA; Radiesse), especially CaHA not mixed with an anesthetic."( Safety and effectiveness of injection of calcium hydroxylapatite via blunt cannula compared to injection by needle for correction of nasolabial folds.
Beer, KR, 2014
)
0.4
"The Safety of Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V) has been well established in both controlled clinical studies and in clinical use, showing only mild and transient anticipated side effects and only rare unanticipated adverse events (AEs)."( Review of the safety profile for microfocused ultrasound with visualization.
Dobke, MK; Hitchcock, TM, 2014
)
0.4
"Scalp block with a mixture of lidocaine and ropivacaine seems to provide effective and safe anesthetic management in patients undergoing awake craniotomy."( Efficacy and Safety of a Lidocaine and Ropivacaine Mixture for Scalp Nerve Block and Local Infiltration Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Awake Craniotomy.
Chaki, T; Hatakeyama, Y; Hayase, T; Ishioka, Y; Janicki, PK; Kaneuchi-Yamashita, M; Kohri, N; Sugino, S; Yamakage, M, 2016
)
1.03
"It has been reported that lidocaine is toxic to various types of cells."( Lidocaine sensitizes the cytotoxicity of cisplatin in breast cancer cells via up-regulation of RARβ2 and RASSF1A demethylation.
Han, X; Li, K; Yang, J, 2014
)
2.15
" Today, level 1 evidence exists for the safe use of epinephrine in fingers."( [Time to bury the adrenaline-myth!--Safe use of adrenaline anesthesia in hand surgery and orthopedics].
Hagert, E; Lalonde, D, 2015
)
0.42
" Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) included lip bruising, swelling, and pain and were mostly mild and transient in nature, without anticipated device AEs."( A randomized, evaluator-blinded, controlled study of effectiveness and safety of small particle hyaluronic acid plus lidocaine for lip augmentation and perioral rhytides.
Beer, K; Bulley, B; Dover, JS; Glogau, RG; Handiwala, L; Olin, JT; Shamban, A, 2015
)
0.63
" Use of the active system was not associated with any serious adverse events or any adverse events resulting in study discontinuation."( Safety and Efficacy of Needle-free Powder Lidocaine Delivery System in Adult Patients Undergoing Venipuncture or Peripheral Venous Cannulation: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial.
Meyer, JM; Schmitz, ML; Zempsky, WT, 2016
)
0.7
" Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) and relationship to study treatment."( Safety and Efficacy of a Needle-free Powder Lidocaine Delivery System in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Venipuncture or Peripheral Venous Cannulation: Randomized Double-blind COMFORT-004 Trial.
Meyer, JM; Schmitz, ML; Zempsky, WT, 2015
)
0.68
" Safety was assessed by a 14-day subject diary and recording of adverse events (AEs) during the whole study."( An Open-Label, Multicenter, Evaluator-Blinded Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of a New Hyaluronic Acid-Based Gel Product for Lip Enhancement.
Fagrell, D; Haglund, P; Hamilton, L; Kuusk, S; Samuelson, U; Wetter, A, 2015
)
0.42
" Therapy with these agents is often complicated because of the presence of significant associated adverse effects, clinician unfamiliarity, variable dosing strategies, and the potential for drug-drug interactions."( Continuous intravenous antiarrhythmic agents in the intensive care unit: strategies for safe and effective use of amiodarone, lidocaine, and procainamide.
Mohrien, KM; Oliphant, CS; Samarin, MJ,
)
0.34
" The second validity evaluation variable including the global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS), the WSRS, and adverse event reporting at weeks 8, 16, and 24 were also performed."( The Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine-Containing Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler for Treatment of Nasolabial Folds: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Study.
Choi, WJ; Han, SW; Kang, H; Kim, HW; Kim, JE; Kim, MB, 2015
)
0.71
" Both fillers were well tolerated and adverse reactions were mild and transient in most cases."( The Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine-Containing Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler for Treatment of Nasolabial Folds: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Study.
Choi, WJ; Han, SW; Kang, H; Kim, HW; Kim, JE; Kim, MB, 2015
)
0.71
"Mydrane is an effective and safe alternative to standard eye drops for initiating and maintaining intraoperative mydriasis and analgesia."( Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a standardised intracameral combination of mydriatics and anaesthetics for cataract surgery.
Alió, J; Behndig, A; Cochener, B; Colin, J; Findl, O; Hartani, D; Labetoulle, M; Lazreg, S; Lobo, C; Malecaze, F; Tassignon, MJ, 2016
)
0.43
"Prefilled syringes of lidocaine remain safe to use for up to 4 weeks, and the current regulations placed on the disposal of these solutions should be revisited."( Safety of Prefilled Buffered Lidocaine Syringes With and Without Epinephrine.
Akin, R; Emrick, A; Pate, DA; Shimizu, I; Snodgrass, K, 2016
)
1.04
" Although tumescent lidocaine anesthesia is used for an increasing variety of surgical procedures, the maximum safe dosage is unknown."( Estimated Maximal Safe Dosages of Tumescent Lidocaine.
Jeske, DR; Klein, JA, 2016
)
1.02
"Preliminary estimates for maximum safe dosages of tumescent lidocaine are 28 mg/kg without liposuction and 45 mg/kg with liposuction."( Estimated Maximal Safe Dosages of Tumescent Lidocaine.
Jeske, DR; Klein, JA, 2016
)
0.94
" Most reported adverse events (80%) were mild in severity."( Effectiveness and Safety of Large Gel Particle Hyaluronic Acid With Lidocaine for Correction of Midface Volume Deficit or Contour Deficiency.
Bank, D; Dover, J; Few, J; Joseph, J; Lin, X; Mashburn, J; Moradi, A; Nogueira, A; Weiss, RA, 2016
)
0.67
" There were limited data available on the effect of systemic lidocaine on adverse effects or surgical complications."( Efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after surgery: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis.
Afshari, A; Eberhart, LH; Hahnenkamp, K; Hollmann, MW; Jokinen, J; Kranke, P; Pace, NL; Poepping, DM; Schnabel, A; Weibel, S, 2016
)
0.95
"Perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality associated with pediatric anesthesia."( Site-directed topical lidocaine spray attenuates perioperative respiratory adverse events in children undergoing elective surgery.
Ai, Y; Chu, Q; He, L; Li, LW; Zhang, W, 2016
)
0.75
" No systemic adverse events were reported."( Efficacy and safety of bupivacaine versus lidocaine in local anesthesia of the nasopharynx: A meta-analysis.
He, Z; Huang, L; Wang, J; Yu, X, 2016
)
0.7
" No systemic adverse event due to topical lidocaine were observed."( Lidocaine controls pain and allows safe wound bed preparation and debridement of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: a retrospective study.
Bartoli, F; Braschi, F; Bruni, C; De Paulis, A; Fantauzzo, C; Fiori, G; Matucci-Cerinic, M; Paganelli, L; Rasero, L, 2017
)
2.16
"Intracutaneous lidocaine is used for anesthesia in dermatologic surgery for skin cancer excision and repair with exceedingly low incidence of reported adverse events."( Safety of Local Intracutaneous Lidocaine Anesthesia Used by Dermatologic Surgeons for Skin Cancer Excision and Postcancer Reconstruction: Quantification of Standard Injection Volumes and Adverse Event Rates.
Alam, M; Fosko, SW; Geisler, A; Poon, E; Schaeffer, MR; Srivastava, D, 2016
)
1.07
"To measure (1) the quantity of lidocaine typically used for facial skin cancer excision and reconstruction; and (2) the frequency and character of associated adverse events."( Safety of Local Intracutaneous Lidocaine Anesthesia Used by Dermatologic Surgeons for Skin Cancer Excision and Postcancer Reconstruction: Quantification of Standard Injection Volumes and Adverse Event Rates.
Alam, M; Fosko, SW; Geisler, A; Poon, E; Schaeffer, MR; Srivastava, D, 2016
)
1.01
" Incidence of adverse events possibly anesthesia related was >0."( Safety of Local Intracutaneous Lidocaine Anesthesia Used by Dermatologic Surgeons for Skin Cancer Excision and Postcancer Reconstruction: Quantification of Standard Injection Volumes and Adverse Event Rates.
Alam, M; Fosko, SW; Geisler, A; Poon, E; Schaeffer, MR; Srivastava, D, 2016
)
0.72
" Volumes of lidocaine in skin cancer excision and repair are modest and within safe limits."( Safety of Local Intracutaneous Lidocaine Anesthesia Used by Dermatologic Surgeons for Skin Cancer Excision and Postcancer Reconstruction: Quantification of Standard Injection Volumes and Adverse Event Rates.
Alam, M; Fosko, SW; Geisler, A; Poon, E; Schaeffer, MR; Srivastava, D, 2016
)
1.1
" The second evaluation variables included the global aesthetic improvement scale, wrinkle severity rating scale, and adverse events."( The Efficacy and Safety of HA IDF Plus (with Lidocaine) Versus HA IDF (Without Lidocaine) in Nasolabial Folds Injection: A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Split-Face Study.
Kim, SH; Lee, JH; Park, ES, 2017
)
0.71
" Both HA IDF plus and HA IDF were considerably tolerated and most adverse reactions were mild and transient."( The Efficacy and Safety of HA IDF Plus (with Lidocaine) Versus HA IDF (Without Lidocaine) in Nasolabial Folds Injection: A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Split-Face Study.
Kim, SH; Lee, JH; Park, ES, 2017
)
0.71
" Although it is considered safe and effective, CSE can be complicated by local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), a potentially life-threatening condition."( Two for One: A Case Report of Intravenous Lipid Emulsion to Treat Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity in Term Pregnancy.
Dun-Chi Lin, J; Horlocker, TT; Missair, A; Sivanesan, E, 2017
)
0.46
" Both fillers were well tolerated, and adverse reactions were mild."( A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new monophasic hyaluronic acid filler with lidocaine 0.3% in the correction of nasolabial fold.
Im, SI; Kim, BJ; Lee, JH; Lim, JS; Oh, CT; Suh, JH, 2017
)
0.66
" Anesthesia onset time, total number of intraoperative children movements, hemodynamics (heart rate, arterial pressure, pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate), total cumulative dose of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil, the amount of midazolam and lidocaine, time to first dose of rescue midazolam and lidocaine, postoperative recovery time, adverse events, bronchoscopist satisfaction score were recorded."( The safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine-remifentanil in children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy: A retrospective dose-finding trial.
Jin, S; Li, X; Li, Y; Wang, X; Zhang, D, 2017
)
0.63
" Rats were inspected for durations of effective sensory and motor nerve blocks, systemic adverse effects, and histological changes of local tissues."( The quaternary lidocaine derivative QX-314 in combination with bupivacaine for long-lasting nerve block: Efficacy, toxicity, and the optimal formulation in rats.
Li, J; Liu, J; Lv, R; Ma, L; Yang, X; Yin, Q; Zhang, W; Zheng, Q; Zhu, T, 2017
)
0.81
" However, the maximum safe dose of DEX is unclear, and its protective effects against lidocaine-related neurotoxicity need to be confirmed."( Dexmedetomidine inhibits activation of the MAPK pathway and protects PC12 and NG108-15 cells from lidocaine-induced cytotoxicity at its maximum safe dose.
Bi, X; Ruan, X; She, Y; Tan, Y; Wang, Q; Wei, W; Xu, Y; Zhang, N; Zhao, B, 2017
)
0.9
" Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, resource utilization data and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) as described in the leaflet were extracted."( Characteristics, resource utilization and safety profile of patients prescribed with neuropathic pain treatments: a real-world evidence study on general practices in Europe - the role of the lidocaine 5% medicated plaster.
Katz, P; Liedgens, H; Pegoraro, V, 2017
)
0.65
" These results show that CaHA (+) is an effective and safe option to correct temporal fossae volume loss associated with high patient satisfaction."( Pilot Study Examining the Safety and Efficacy of Calcium Hydroxylapatite Filler With Integral Lidocaine Over a 12-Month Period to Correct Temporal Fossa Volume Loss.
Juhász, MLW; Levin, MK; Marmur, ES, 2018
)
0.7
" Concomitant treatments and adverse reactions were also recorded."( Efficacy and safety of 5% lidocaine-medicated plasters in localized pain with neuropathic and/or inflammatory characteristics: an observational, real-world study.
Amato, F; Ciliberto, G; Consoletti, L; Duse, G; Firetto, V; Lo Presti, C; Mazza, M; Palmieri, V; Parigi, LA, 2017
)
0.76
" Safety outcomes included incidence of serious (eg, cardiac arrest) and nonserious (eg, dizziness) adverse events."( Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Pain Management in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.
Bellolio, MF; Cabrera, D; E Silva, LOJ; Erwin, PJ; Motov, S; Murad, MH; Scherber, K; West, CP, 2018
)
0.76
" The article concludes that adrenaline containing lidocaine preparations such as lignospan are safe for use in the pinna and nose, and should be considered for use in emergency departments."( Is it safe to inject local anaesthetic with adrenaline into the pinna and external nose?
Henderson, A; Millar, E; Waddell, A, 2018
)
0.73
"Repeat treatment with VYC-15L at 1 year was safe and effective for lip and perioral enhancement, and required less product volume to achieve similar effectiveness to initial/touch-up treatment."( Safety and Effectiveness of Repeat Treatment With VYC-15L for Lip and Perioral Enhancement: Results From a Prospective Multicenter Study.
Biesman, BS; Glaser, DA; Hardas, B; Murphy, DK; Rivkin, A; Schumacher, A; Weinkle, SH; Weiss, RA, 2019
)
0.51
"Repeat treatment with VYC-15L at 1 year was safe and effective for lip and perioral enhancement, and required less product volume to achieve similar effectiveness to initial/touch-up treatment."( Safety and Effectiveness of Repeat Treatment With VYC-15L for Lip and Perioral Enhancement: Results From a Prospective Multicenter Study.
Biesman, BS; Glaser, DA; Hardas, B; Murphy, DK; Rivkin, A; Schumacher, A; Weinkle, SH; Weiss, RA, 2019
)
0.51
" No mixture related adverse events (nausea, vomiting, pruritus, sedation, respiratory depression) or those related to electrocardiographic parameters (arrhythmias and asystole) were reported in any patients."( The safety of a mixture of bupivacaine and lidocaine in children after urologic inguinal and scrotal surgery.
Chung, JM; Lee, K; Lee, SD, 2018
)
0.74
" An appropriate dose has no clinically significant hemodynamic or cardiac changes and adverse effects."( The safety of a mixture of bupivacaine and lidocaine in children after urologic inguinal and scrotal surgery.
Chung, JM; Lee, K; Lee, SD, 2018
)
0.74
" Outcomes included 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale score and adverse events."( Effectiveness and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid Gel with Lidocaine for the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Luan, J; Luan, S; Mi, B; Panayi, AC; Wang, C; Xin, M, 2018
)
0.73
" The main adverse events, such as swelling, erythema, bruising, itching and induration, also showed no significant difference."( Effectiveness and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid Gel with Lidocaine for the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Luan, J; Luan, S; Mi, B; Panayi, AC; Wang, C; Xin, M, 2018
)
0.73
" The secondary outcomes of pain intensity, adverse safety events, and local anesthetic toxicity were also assessed."( Perioperative lidocaine infusions for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety.
Bailey, M; Corcoran, T; Schug, S; Toner, A, 2018
)
0.84
"In the appropriate patient population, IV lidocaine may be a safe and effective treatment for children and adolescents with status migraine."( Safety and Efficacy of IV Lidocaine in the Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Status Migraine.
Ayulo, MA; Phillips, KE; Tripathi, S, 2018
)
1.05
" A study drug was inserted into the defect socket after the extraction, and postoperative pain intensity, satisfaction with postoperative pain relief, adverse events, and postoperative supplemental analgesic rescue use (time, dose) were investigated by patient self-report."( Sustained-release lidocaine sheet for pain following tooth extraction: A randomized, single-blind, dose-response, controlled, clinical study of efficacy and safety.
Kosugi, K; Saito, S; Suto, T; Suzuki, T; Tabata, Y; Tobe, M; Yokoo, S, 2018
)
0.81
" Two women received a toxic dose of lidocaine, and both were in the VH + VR group."( Lidocaine Use in Vaginal Surgery and Risk of Toxicity.
Brueseke, TJ; Connolly, A; Geller, EJ; Husk, KE; Willis-Gray, MG, 2020
)
2.28
" In order to ensure that intra-articular lidocaine is safe to use, treatments aimed at mitigating chondrocyte death have recently been investigated."( Protective effects of platelet-rich plasma against lidocaine cytotoxicity on canine articular chondrocytes.
Bianchini, E; Buratta, S; Chiaradia, E; Di Meo, A; Floridi, C; Mancini, F; Moscati, L; Pepe, M; Pistilli, A; Stabile, A, 2018
)
1
" The onset time, analgesic effect and adverse events were recorded."( Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety between articaine and lidocaine in the anaesthesia management of tooth pulp disease.
Gao, Y; Li, J; Qian, Y; Wei, W; Yang, W, 2018
)
0.72
"Upper gastrointestinal endoscopies (UGEs) performed under ketamine sedation may increase the risk of respiratory adverse events (RAEs) due to pharyngeal stimulation."( Topical Pharyngeal Lidocaine Reduces Respiratory Adverse Events During Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopies Under Ketamine Sedation in Children.
Estalella-Mendoza, A; Flores-González, JC; Lechuga-Sancho, AM; Rodríguez-Campoy, P; Saldaña-Valderas, M, 2019
)
0.84
" The most commonly reported adverse events were administration site reactions linked to topical administration."( Lidocaine medicated plaster, an additional potential treatment option for localized post-surgical neuropathic pain: efficacy and safety results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Attal, N; Boesl, I; Buchheister, B; Koenig, S; Palladini, M, 2019
)
1.96
" Conclusively, blood system (especially erythrocyte system) and digestive system, including liver and gastrointestinal tract, might be the toxic targets of ALED."( Preclinical safety assessment of antipyrine combined with lidocaine hydrochloride as ear drops.
Ba, JB; Chu, ZY; Feng, X; Liu, WH; Zhang, XD; Zou, YX, 2019
)
0.76
" Adverse events were recorded."( Open-Label, Post-Marketing Study to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of Calcium Hydroxylapatite With Integral Lidocaine to Correct Facial Volume Loss
Muti, GF, 2019
)
0.72
" No adverse events requiring emergency intervention with a crash cart or transfer to the emergency department occurred despite a patient population with advanced age and a wide range of comorbidities."( Safety of Intradermal/Subcutaneous Lidocaine With Epinephrine Use in Dermatologic Surgery.
Diven, DG; Dozier, SE; Edmiston, C; Fox, MC; Hirshburg, JM; Woody, M, 2020
)
0.84
"No serious adverse events requiring emergency intervention were associated with lidocaine with epinephrine doses administered below the Food and Drug Administration recommended maximum."( Safety of Intradermal/Subcutaneous Lidocaine With Epinephrine Use in Dermatologic Surgery.
Diven, DG; Dozier, SE; Edmiston, C; Fox, MC; Hirshburg, JM; Woody, M, 2020
)
1.06
" Unsedated PEG insertion appears to be a feasible, well-tolerated, and safe option for stroke-related dysphagia."( Unsedated Outpatient Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Stroke Patients: Is It Feasible and Safe?
Kapanidis, K; Kotzampassi, K; Michalopoulos, A; Stavrou, G; Tsaousi, G, 2019
)
0.51
"Compared to IVA, FNB was an effective and safe strategy for the positioning of femur fracture patients for a spinal block, particularly patients who received SA in the sitting position."( Efficacy and safety of femoral nerve block for the positioning of femur fracture patients before a spinal block - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bai, CH; Chen, C; Chen, JH; Cheng, SW; Chu, KCW; Hsu, CW; Hsu, YP; Huang, CJ; Huang, WC, 2019
)
0.51
" Safety assessments included injection site responses (ISRs), recorded in a subject diary, and adverse events (AEs)."( Safe, Effective Chin and Jaw Restoration With VYC-25L Hyaluronic Acid Injectable Gel.
Abrams, S; Belhaouari, L; Chawla, S; Gaymans, F; Ogilvie, P; Sattler, G; Schumacher, A; Snow, S; Weichman, BM, 2019
)
0.51
"VYC-25L significantly improved glabella-subnasale-pogonion facial angle and was generally safe and well tolerated."( Safe, Effective Chin and Jaw Restoration With VYC-25L Hyaluronic Acid Injectable Gel.
Abrams, S; Belhaouari, L; Chawla, S; Gaymans, F; Ogilvie, P; Sattler, G; Schumacher, A; Snow, S; Weichman, BM, 2019
)
0.51
" We hypothesized that the use of local dental anesthesia with lidocaine with and without epinephrine is safe and does not result in life-threatening arrhythmias in patients with channelopathies."( Is It Safe for Patients With Cardiac Channelopathies to Undergo Routine Dental Care? Experience From a Single-Center Study.
Barbosa, SA; Carvalho, CMA; Darrieux, FCC; Grupi, CJ; Hachul, DT; Montano, TCP; Neves, ILI; Neves, RS; Oliveira, ACG; Olivetti, NQS; Pastore, CA; Sacilotto, L; Samesima, N; Santos-Paul, MAD; Scanavacca, MI; Wu, TC, 2019
)
0.75
" Treatment-related adverse events were reported in seven subjects (7."( A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Split-Hand Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Large-Gel-Particle Hyaluronic Acid with Lidocaine for the Correction of Volume Deficits in the Dorsal Hand.
Allen, S; Bank, D; Cohen, JL; Fagien, S; Glaser, DA; Maguire, C; Marmur, E; Moradi, A, 2019
)
0.71
" However, comprehensive evaluation and identification of the most efficacious and safe intervention are lacking."( Efficacy and Safety of Pulpal Anesthesia Strategies during Endodontic Treatment of Permanent Mandibular Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Azarpazhooh, A; Beyene, J; Lighvan, NL; Shah, PS; Yarascavitch, C; Zanjir, M, 2019
)
0.51
" Systemic toxicity with reflex on the central nervous and cardiovascular systems is their most feared adverse reactions, and the anaphylactic reaction is the most concerning one."( Safety of local anesthetics.
Cherobin, ACFP; Tavares, GT,
)
0.13
" Postoperative safety included adverse events, endothelial cell density and vision."( Safety and efficacy of a standardized intracameral combination of mydriatics and anesthetic for cataract surgery in type-2 diabetic patients.
Behndig, A; Bérard, A; Chiambaretta, F; Cochener-Lamard, B; Güell, JL; Labetoulle, M; Mencucci, R; Nuijts, R; Pleyer, U; Rosen, P; Szaflik, J; Tassignon, MJ, 2020
)
0.56
"Propofol-based sedation is widely used in ERCP procedures, but adverse respiratory or cardiovascular events commonly occur."( Efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine in propofol-based sedation for ERCP procedures: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial.
Ji, R; Li, YQ; Liu, C; Liu, J; Liu, X; Peng, LP, 2020
)
0.84
" For each study, efficacy, effectiveness, and adverse events data were extracted."( The Efficacy, Effectiveness and Safety of 5% Transdermal Lidocaine Patch for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review.
Felix, ER; Klass, S; Santana, JA, 2020
)
0.8
" Therefore, the study aims to compare the efficacy and the adverse events of articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100 000 with lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:100 000 for primary molar extraction using buccal infiltration."( Efficacy and adverse events of 4% articaine compared with 2% lidocaine on primary molar extraction: A randomised controlled trial.
Bolan, M; Cardoso, M; Massignan, C; Silveira Santos, P, 2020
)
1.01
" Adverse events were examined as secondary outcomes."( Efficacy and adverse events of 4% articaine compared with 2% lidocaine on primary molar extraction: A randomised controlled trial.
Bolan, M; Cardoso, M; Massignan, C; Silveira Santos, P, 2020
)
0.8
" Adverse side effects of lidocaine and morphine sulfate and changes in vital signs were also recorded and compared."( The efficacy of intravenous lidocaine and its side effects in comparison with intravenous morphine sulfate in patients admitted to the ED with right upper abdominal pain suspected of biliary colic.
Akhgar, A; Hossein-Nejad, H; Nejati, A; Pouryousefi, T; Rafiemanesh, H, 2021
)
1.22
" Only 9 patients had adverse effects in either group."( The efficacy of intravenous lidocaine and its side effects in comparison with intravenous morphine sulfate in patients admitted to the ED with right upper abdominal pain suspected of biliary colic.
Akhgar, A; Hossein-Nejad, H; Nejati, A; Pouryousefi, T; Rafiemanesh, H, 2021
)
0.92
" Controversy persists as to whether epinephrine is safe for use in the hand."( Wide-Awake Surgery With Local Anesthesia and Epinephrine Is Safe.
Banner, L; Ilyas, AM; Jennings, JD; Matzon, JL, 2020
)
0.56
" A total of 29 treatment related adverse events were reported by 16% of subjects, all were mild (79%) or moderate (21%) in intensity."( Safety and Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers With Lidocaine for Full-Face Treatment in Asian Patients.
Huang, SH; Tsai, TF, 2020
)
0.8
" This study aimed to determine the safety and adverse effects seen in patients that receive larger amounts of locally injected lidocaine."( Risk of adverse events due to high volumes of local anesthesia during Mohs micrographic surgery.
Clayton, A; Danford, BC; Darragh, C; Frank, N; Patrinely, JR; Wheless, L, 2021
)
0.83
"The authors aimed to assess whether 4% articaine is a safe and effective local anesthetic (LA) for mandibular third-molar extractions."( Safety and efficacy of 4% articaine in mandibular third-molar extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Gay-Escoda, C; Santos-Sanz, L; Toledano-Serrabona, J, 2020
)
0.56
"Use of 4% articaine for mandibular third-molar extraction is a safe choice that requires fewer reinjections and has a shorter onset time than other aminoamide-type LAs."( Safety and efficacy of 4% articaine in mandibular third-molar extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Gay-Escoda, C; Santos-Sanz, L; Toledano-Serrabona, J, 2020
)
0.56
" The weight of evidence indicates 2,6-xylidine is a non-direct acting (metabolic threshold-dependent) genotoxin, and is not genotoxic in vivo in rats in the absence of acute systemic toxic effects, which occur at levels 35 × beyond lidocaine-related exposure in humans."( A weight of evidence assessment of the genotoxicity of 2,6-xylidine based on existing and new data, with relevance to safety of lidocaine exposure.
Johnson, GE; Kirkland, DJ; Sheil, ML; Streicker, MA, 2021
)
1.01
" Our outcomes of interest were the differences in total dose of propofol administered, procedure time, and intraoperative adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of supplemental intravenous lidocaine for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Henry, C; Howden, CW; Imam, Z; Jowhar, D; Kamal, F; Khan, MA; Khan, Z; Lee-Smith, W; Patel, JR; Petryna, E; Qualkenbush, EAV; Sharma, S, 2021
)
0.88
"This study demonstrates that calcium hydroxylapatite is effective and safe for restoration and augmentation of the jawline using the unique needle and cannula technique."( A Randomized, Evaluator-Blind, Split-Face Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Calcium Hydroxylapatite for Jawline Augmentation.
Alhaddad, M; Boen, M; Goldman, MP; Hoss, E; Kollipara, R; Wu, DC, 2022
)
0.72
" Also assessed were changes in oral morphine equivalent dose (OME), frequency of breakthrough medication, functional status, adverse effects and perception of response."( Lidocaine Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion for Neuropathic Pain in Hospice Patients: Safety and Efficacy.
Hunt, RW; Kiani, CS, 2021
)
2.06
" The primary outcome of this analysis was to determine the incidence of adverse effects (AEs) and the reason for discontinuation of lidocaine."( Evaluating the Safety of Continuous Infusion Lidocaine for Postoperative Pain.
Kovacevic, MP; Lupi, KE; Schuler, BR; Szumita, PM, 2021
)
1.09
" The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between treatment groups in both studies; most were mild or moderate intensity."( Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of LiRIS 400 mg in women with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome with or without Hunner lesions.
Evans, R; Geib, T; Kohan, A; Moldwin, R; Peters, KM; Radecki, D, 2021
)
0.62
" Adverse events will also be monitored throughout the study."( The PATCH trial: efficacy and safety of 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster for the treatment of patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a study protocol for a multicentric, double-blind, enriched enrolment randomised withdrawal, vehicle-controlled study.
Fan, B; Liu, H; Luo, F; Meng, L; Shen, Y; Shrestha, N; Zhao, C, 2021
)
0.88
" While safe and well-tolerated when used appropriately, an overdose of these anesthetics increases the risk for local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), which in severe cases can present with seizures, cardiac dysrhythmias, and ultimately cardiovascular collapse."( Local anesthetic systemic toxicity in the pediatric patient.
Baker, KA; McMahon, K; Paster, J, 2022
)
0.72
"Using cannulas to deliver facial fillers may reduce adverse events (AEs) compared with needle injection."( Safety and Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid Filler, VYC-20L, via Cannula for Cheek Augmentation: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Study.
Chawla, S; Cox, SE; Jones, D; McDermott, M; Palm, M; Sartor, M, 2021
)
0.62
"VYC-20L for cheek augmentation was safe and effective using a cannula and noninferior to needle injection."( Safety and Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid Filler, VYC-20L, via Cannula for Cheek Augmentation: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Study.
Chawla, S; Cox, SE; Jones, D; McDermott, M; Palm, M; Sartor, M, 2021
)
0.62
" Adverse events were recorded over a 60-week period."( Effectiveness and Safety of Calcium Hydroxylapatite With Lidocaine for Improving Jawline Contour.
Cohen, J; Dakovic, R; Green, J; Joseph, J; Moradi, A; Odena, G; Scher, R; Verma, A, 2021
)
0.87
" The study demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no reported unexpected adverse events."( Effectiveness and Safety of Calcium Hydroxylapatite With Lidocaine for Improving Jawline Contour.
Cohen, J; Dakovic, R; Green, J; Joseph, J; Moradi, A; Odena, G; Scher, R; Verma, A, 2021
)
0.87
"CaHA (+) is a safe and effective treatment for improving the contour of the jawline."( Effectiveness and Safety of Calcium Hydroxylapatite With Lidocaine for Improving Jawline Contour.
Cohen, J; Dakovic, R; Green, J; Joseph, J; Moradi, A; Odena, G; Scher, R; Verma, A, 2021
)
0.87
"The rat Langendorff-perfused isolated heart, anaesthetised rat and rat ventricular myocyte preparations were utilised in a series of blinded and randomised studies to investigate the antiarrhythmic effectiveness, adverse effects and mechanism of action of OCT2013, compared with lidocaine."( OCT2013, an ischaemia-activated antiarrhythmic prodrug, devoid of the systemic side effects of lidocaine.
Chowdhury, RA; Curtis, MJ; Firth, J; Hesketh, LM; MacLeod, KT; Mahoney-Sanchez, L; Mazzacuva, F; Ogrodzinski, S; Patterson, LH; Peters, NS; Sikkel, MB; Tzortzis, KN; Wilder, CDE; Winter, J, 2022
)
1.12
"In isolated hearts, OCT2013 and lidocaine prevented ischaemia-induced VF equi-effectively, but OCT2013 did not share lidocaine's adverse effects (PR widening, bradycardia and negative inotropy)."( OCT2013, an ischaemia-activated antiarrhythmic prodrug, devoid of the systemic side effects of lidocaine.
Chowdhury, RA; Curtis, MJ; Firth, J; Hesketh, LM; MacLeod, KT; Mahoney-Sanchez, L; Mazzacuva, F; Ogrodzinski, S; Patterson, LH; Peters, NS; Sikkel, MB; Tzortzis, KN; Wilder, CDE; Winter, J, 2022
)
1.22
"As an easily accessible and cost-effective method, cold saline solution alone might be an alternative to topical ophthalmic proparacaine alone with comparable safe and effective results."( A double-blinded randomized clinical trial for pain perception: The efficacy and safety of topical cold saline solution anesthesia in phacoemulsification.
Akpolat, C; Demir, M; Guven, D; Karapapak, M; Sendul, SY, 2022
)
0.72
" The adverse event profile was similar between the treatment groups."( Safety and Effectiveness of a Novel Hyaluronic Acid Gel for Lip Augmentation.
Adelglass, J; Alonso-Llamazares, J; Fenton, J; Gold, M; Schlessinger, J; Smith, S, 2022
)
0.72
" Patients were regularly followed for pain intensity, co-analgesic consumption, adverse effects, QoL using the EQ-5D, and patient satisfaction for 8 weeks."( Lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster for post-herpetic neuralgia: focus on Quality of Life, effectiveness and safety - a retrospective observational study.
Aurilio, C; Coppolino, F; Giaccari, LG; Pace, MC; Passavanti, MB; Pota, V; Sansone, P, 2022
)
2.16
" Intra-articular injection of local anaesthetics should be limited in the TMJ because of the potential toxic effects."( Chondrotoxic effects of intra-articular injection of local anaesthetics in the rabbit temporomandibular joint.
Ağyüz, G; Asan, CY; Asan, M; Canpolat, DG; Demirbas, AE; Karakükcü, Ç; Ülger, M; Yay, A, 2022
)
0.72
" There are various case reports, however, of ocular and systemic complications associated with intracameral phenylephrine such as generation of free radicals, toxic anterior segment syndrome, inconsistent pupillary dilation during surgery, and ventricular fibrillation."( The safety of intracameral phenylephrine - A systematic review.
Casson, R; Chan, WO; Gowda, A; Jie, WWJ,
)
0.13
"LMP has been shown to provide effective and sustained analgesia in some TN patients with minimal risk of systemic adverse reactions."( Effectiveness, Safety, and Predictors of Response to 5% Lidocaine-Medicated Plaster for the Treatment of Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Study.
Luo, F; Meng, L; Xing, Y; Yu, B; Zhang, W; Zhao, C, 2023
)
1.16
" Pain was assessed on a visual analog scale; aesthetic effectiveness was evaluated with validated scales, and safety was monitored based on common treatment responses (CTRs) and adverse events (AEs)."( Patient Comfort, Safety, and Effectiveness of Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers Formulated With Different Local Anesthetics.
Dayan, SH; Eaton, L; Joseph, JH; Kaufman-Janette, J; Maffert, P; Smith, S, 2022
)
0.72
"Resilient hyaluronic acid fillers with either mepivacaine or lidocaine are equally effective at reducing pain during treatment and equally performant and safe for correction of dynamic facial wrinkles and folds."( Patient Comfort, Safety, and Effectiveness of Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers Formulated With Different Local Anesthetics.
Dayan, SH; Eaton, L; Joseph, JH; Kaufman-Janette, J; Maffert, P; Smith, S, 2022
)
0.96
"A novel and safe oral Li-DMNs have potential applications in large animals and clinical trials and would possibly enter the anesthesia market."( Lidocaine-loaded dissolving microneedle for safe local anesthesia on oral mucosa for dental procedure.
Gong, S; Jang, M; Jung, H; Jung, UW; Kang, G; Lee, C; Lee, H; Lee, S; Min, HS; Ryu, HY; Song, YW; Yang, H, 2023
)
2.35
"Intravesical instillation of TRG-100 was found to be safe and efficient in reducing pain and irritative bladder symptoms in our study population."( Open Label, Pilot Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Intravesical Sustained Release System of Lidocaine and Oxybutynin (TRG-100) for Patients With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome, Overactive Bladder and Patients With Retained Ureteral St
Ala-Adin, N; Chertin, B; Dothan, D; Gordon, A; Hatumi, S; Kafka, I; Malchi, N; Moldwin, R; Nassar, T; Perez, D; Raisin, G; Shenfeld, O; Touitou, D, 2023
)
1.13
"Spontaneous reports notified to the French Pharmacovigilance Network were retrieved and followed by a case-by-case review, according to the following criteria: LA as suspected drug, age < 18 years, adverse drug reactions related to nervous system, cardiac, respiratory, psychiatric or general disorders."( Local anesthetics systemic toxicity in children: analysis of the French pharmacovigilance database.
Bouazza, N; Boyer-Gervoise, M; Callot, D; Chouchana, L; Lesage, F; Oualha, M; Paret, N; Schweitzer-Chaput, A; Treluyer, JM, 2023
)
0.91
"The onset and duration of sensory block and analgesia, hemodynamic parameters, and adverse effects were recorded."( Hemodynamic Safety and Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Superficial Cervical Block Quality for Carotid Endarterectomy: A Prospective Study.
Lijovic, L; Pazur, I; Perisa, N; Radocaj, T; Skrtic, M, 2023
)
0.91
"5% levobupivacaine and 2% lidocaine for SCB did not influence the hemodynamics and frequency of adverse effects."( Hemodynamic Safety and Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Superficial Cervical Block Quality for Carotid Endarterectomy: A Prospective Study.
Lijovic, L; Pazur, I; Perisa, N; Radocaj, T; Skrtic, M, 2023
)
1.21
" Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 38."( Safety and Pharmacokinetics of PSD502 in Healthy Chinese Male and Female Volunteers: Two Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase I Trials.
Diao, L; Li, H; Liu, L; Liu, Z; Lu, J; Niu, X; Qi, L; Sun, Y; Wang, F; Wang, X; Zhao, L; Zhou, Y; Zhu, J, 2023
)
0.91
" Secondary outcomes included EBRR for polyps located in the 5-11 o'clock position, sigmoid colon peristalsis frequency, degree of exposure to the surgical field, operative times, and adverse events."( Intestinal topical lidocaine spray improves the efficacy and safety of endoscopic sigmoid polypectomy.
Lin, DY; Liu, WH; Lu, Q; Wang, XY; Xiong, F; Zeng, T, 2023
)
1.24
" There was no statistical difference in the operative times and adverse event rates between the two groups."( Intestinal topical lidocaine spray improves the efficacy and safety of endoscopic sigmoid polypectomy.
Lin, DY; Liu, WH; Lu, Q; Wang, XY; Xiong, F; Zeng, T, 2023
)
1.24
" We compared the hemodynamic indexes before operation, during puncturing and at 5 minutes after operation, the pain scores during the movement of the probe in the rectum, at puncturing and at 5 minutes after surgery, and the adverse reactions to anesthesia between the two groups of patients."( [Application value and safety of prostate peripheral nerve block combined with dezocine in transrectal prostate biopsy].
Cai, QF; Lu, YX, 2022
)
0.72
"We conducted meta-analyses to evaluate the effect of topical lidocaine on pain intensity, adverse events, and quality of life."( Effect and safety profile of topical lidocaine on post-surgical neuropathic pain and quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chang, Y; Fan, B; Li, Y; Liu, B; Mao, P; Zhang, Y; Zhu, M, 2024
)
1.96
"Topical lidocaine may lead to pain relief and is safe to use for patient with post-surgical pain, though its impact on quality of life is unclear."( Effect and safety profile of topical lidocaine on post-surgical neuropathic pain and quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chang, Y; Fan, B; Li, Y; Liu, B; Mao, P; Zhang, Y; Zhu, M, 2024
)
2.15
" The anesthesia onset time, anesthesia duration, numeric rating scale (NRS) score, anesthesia satisfaction rate and incidence of adverse reactions were recorded and compared between the two groups."( To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dezocine combined with lidocaine in local anesthesia for percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration.
Deng, ZX; Liu, JL; Liu, M; Zhu, XX, 2023
)
1.15
" Despite the publications of comparative studies, there remains a dearth of systematic reviews examining the adverse effects of articaine versus lidocaine in randomized controlled trials."( Adverse effects of articaine versus lidocaine in pediatric dentistry: a meta-analysis.
Li, L; Sun, DL, 2023
)
1.39

Pharmacokinetics

4% lidocaine was applied to healthy volunteers' backs for 12 h in a single-center, open-label, four-treatment,. four-period crossover pharmacokinetic study. The predicted versus observed plasma concentration-time profiles for alfentanil and lidocane were similar.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" A quantitative description of liver function in terms of regional distribution and elimination rate constants will require either a pharmacokinetic model that expressly includes the effects of bilirubin, the development of new anionic hepatobiliary agents capable of displacing endogenous bilirubin from transport binding sites, or the development of new hepatobiliary agents that use a different clearance mechanism from that used by bilirubin."( Hepatic clearance mechanism of Tc-99m-HIDA and its effect on quantitation of hepatobiliary function: Concise communication.
Cooper, M; Faith, W; Harvey, E; Loberg, M; Ryan, J; Sikorski, S, 1979
)
0.26
" Pharmacokinetic studies in man show wide variability in drug disposition between patients, even when cardiac and hepatic status is considered, making specific dosing recommendations a problem."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of lignocaine.
Benowitz, NL; Meister, W,
)
0.13
" The collection of serial urine together with a limited number of blood samples from neonates enabled simultaneous computer fitting of data to a pharmacokinetic model."( The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of the anilide local anaesthetics in neonates. I. Lignocaine.
Mihaly, GW; Moore, RG; Shanks, CA; Thomas, D; Thomas, J; Triggs, EJ, 1978
)
0.26
" A two-compartment open model was used in the pharmacokinetic analysis of the data, and the plasma clearance of alphaxalone was similar to the blood flow through the liver."( Pharmacokinetics of althesin--comparison with lignocaine.
Simpson, ME, 1978
)
0.26
" The drug was found to have linear kinetics over the dose range studied and a plasma half-life of 13."( Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of a new orally effective antiarrhythmic, tocainide.
Fitzgerald, JW; Harrison, DC; Meffin, PJ; Winkle, RA, 1976
)
0.26
" Data are lacking relating pharmacokinetic alterations to haemodynamic measurements in patients with cardiac failure."( Pharmacokinetics in patients with cardiac failure.
Benowitz, NL; Meister, W,
)
0.13
" Pharmacokinetic principles can be of value in devising rational approaches to lidocaine dosage."( Pharmacokinetic approach to the clinical use of lidocaine intravenously.
Bolognini, V; Greenblatt, DJ; Harmatz, JS; Koch-Weser, J, 1976
)
0.74
" The absence of correlation between pharmacokinetic parameters of the disposition of lidocaine and indocyanine green indicates that the influence of hepatic disease on the hepatic processes that lead to the elimination of each compound is not predictable."( Influence of viral hepatitis on the disposition of two compounds with high hepatic clearance: lidocaine and indocyanine green.
Blaschke, TF; Meffin, PJ; Melmon, KL; Rowland, M; Williams, RL, 1976
)
0.7
" The total volume of GX distribution in man is similar to that of lidocaine but the plasma clearance is less, so that the 10-hr elimination phase half-life of GX is much longer than the 1 1/2 hr half-life reported in normal subjects for lidocaine."( Pharmacological activity, metabolism, and pharmacokinetics of glycinexylidide.
Atkinson, AJ; Burris, BC; Mayfield, DE; Raymon, F; Strong, JM; Webster, LT, 1975
)
0.49
"Information derived from measurements of blood concentrations of local anaesthetics can be extended by the application of pharmacokinetic anaylsis."( Pharmacology of local anaesthetic agents. Pharmacokinetics of local anaesthetic agents.
Mather, LE; Tucker, GT, 1975
)
0.25
"3 ml/min/kg), terminal half-life (148 min), and total volume of distribution (1."( Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of lidocaine in patients with renal failure.
Atkinson, AJ; Collinsworth, KA; Harrison, DC; Perlroth, F; Strong, JM; Winkle, RA, 1975
)
0.53
" A study was carried out to investigate the effect of dextran on the pharmacokinetic behaviour of lignocaine during epidural anaesthesia in 20 adult male patients, who were randomly allocated to two treatment groups: group 1 (n = 10) was given lignocaine-dextran; group 2 (n = 10) was given lignocaine-saline."( The effect of dextran on the pharmacokinetics of lignocaine during epidural anaesthesia.
Alkhawajah, A; Farag, H, 1992
)
0.28
"To describe and illustrate a convenient method of forecasting drug concentrations with confidence intervals (CIs) using the means and standard deviations of relevant pharmacokinetic parameters (e."( Setting confidence intervals for drug concentrations from pharmacokinetic parameters.
Inciardi, JF; Willits, NH, 1992
)
0.28
"Using summary statistics from previously published reports, a Monte Carlo technique employing a SAS random number generator creates an arbitrarily large "sample" of each pharmacokinetic parameter."( Setting confidence intervals for drug concentrations from pharmacokinetic parameters.
Inciardi, JF; Willits, NH, 1992
)
0.28
"kg-1) associated with a decreased elimination half-life and mean residence time."( Altered pharmacokinetics of lignocaine after epidural injection in type II diabetics.
Adithan, C; Peeyush, M; Ravishankar, M; Shashindran, CH, 1992
)
0.28
" Mean half-life was 72."( Pharmacokinetics of lignocaine in children after infiltration for cleft palate surgery.
Barker, I; Griffiths, RW; Henderson, P; Michael, S; Reilly, CS, 1992
)
0.28
"Open-label, pharmacodynamic evaluation."( Comparative pharmacodynamics of intravenous lidocaine in patients with acute and chronic ventricular arrhythmias.
Destache, CJ; Hilleman, DE; Hunter, CB; Mohiuddin, SM; Mooss, AN; Sketch, MH, 1992
)
0.54
"A statistically significant difference in the pharmacodynamic effects of lidocaine were observed during the first eight hours of treatment in patients with acute-onset and chronic VPBs."( Comparative pharmacodynamics of intravenous lidocaine in patients with acute and chronic ventricular arrhythmias.
Destache, CJ; Hilleman, DE; Hunter, CB; Mohiuddin, SM; Mooss, AN; Sketch, MH, 1992
)
0.78
" However, the limiting dosages determined up to now do not take account of important pharmacokinetic and toxicological data: (1) The dependence of blood levels measured on the technique of regional anesthesia and (2) the raised toxicity of a local anesthetic solution containing adrenaline following inadvertent intravascular (intravenous) injection."( [Dose limits for local anesthetics. Recommendations based on toxicologic and pharmacokinetic data].
Kaiser, H; Niesel, HC, 1991
)
0.28
" These results show that lignocaine displaces verapamil in-vitro and in-vivo from its plasma protein binding sites, but the ensuing pharmacokinetic changes do not lead to significant changes in free verapamil concentrations."( Influence of lignocaine on plasma protein binding and pharmacokinetics of verapamil in dogs.
Belpaire, FM; Bogaert, MG; Bourda, A; De Rick, A; De Smet, F; Rosseel, MT, 1990
)
0.28
" There was no significant difference in either the percent free or the total lidocaine concentration at any sample time or in any of the pharmacokinetic variables among the three groups."( Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine in children with congenital heart disease.
Burrows, FA; LeDez, KM; Lerman, J; Strong, HA, 1991
)
0.83
" Terminal half-life was 11."( Myocardial uptake of lignocaine: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the isolated perfused heart of the rabbit.
Kantelip, JP; Mazoit, JX; Orhant, EE; Talmant, JM, 1990
)
0.28
"93 (control) ml/min kg], half-life [74."( Lack of acute effect on lidocaine pharmacokinetics from parenteral nutrition.
Coutts, RT; Finegan, BA; Ke, J; Koo, WW; Tam, YK, 1990
)
0.59
"The study aimed at investigating an effect of propranolol on lidocaine pharmacokinetic parameters, especially elimination rate and total clearance rate."( [Effect of propranolol on lidocaine pharmacokinetics].
Bijoś, P; Droździk, M; Feszak, J; Gawrońska-Szklarz, G; Goertz, K; Wójcicki, J,
)
0.67
" In seven patients pharmacokinetic data were obtained."( Continuous intercostal blockade with lidocaine after thoracic surgery. Clinical and pharmacokinetic study.
Castelain, MH; Journois, D; Kuhlman, G; Orhant, EE; Safran, D, 1990
)
0.55
"The use of a function to fit blood concentration-time data points is equivalent, under certain assumptions, to specifying a model of the distribution of residence times of the drug molecules in the body (stochastic pharmacokinetic model)."( Pharmacokinetic stochastic model with Weibull-distributed residence times of drug molecules in the body.
Piotrovskii, VK, 1987
)
0.27
" The present experiments examined these substances for pharmacodynamic differences."( Stereoselectivity of tocainide pharmacodynamics in vivo and in vitro.
Block, AJ; Merrill, D; Smith, ER, 1988
)
0.27
" 4-compartment model was introduced to analyze pharmacokinetic parameters, and which gave the most reasonable fit with actual results."( [Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine and its metabolites in dog. Comparison between normal and CCl4-induced hepatic lesion].
Yamane, J, 1989
)
0.6
"0748 hr-1), elimination half-life (average reduction, 13."( Influence of rifampin on tocainide pharmacokinetics in humans.
Celestin, C; Foster, JR; Patterson, JH; Powell, JR; Rice, TL, 1989
)
0.28
" The short duration of the bypass procedure and the continuous changes during the process hamper a rigorous pharmacokinetic evaluation."( Cardiopulmonary bypass and the pharmacokinetics of drugs. An update.
Bogaert, MG; Buylaert, WA; Herregods, LL; Mortier, EP, 1989
)
0.28
" The mean absorption half-life was approximately 7 min and the mean bioavailability was slightly in excess of 100%."( Pharmacokinetics of quinacrine after intrapleural instillation in rabbits and man.
Björkman, S; Elisson, LO; Gabrielsson, J, 1989
)
0.28
" The half-life of propranolol and lidocaine in the initial phase of elimination correlated with the degree of portal-arterial disorders in liver blood supply."( [Usefulness of the evaluation of blood supply and mass of the liver for predicting the rate of pharmacokinetics of lidocaine, propranolol and phenazone].
Becker, A; Bołdys, H; Hartleb, M; Kloc, T; Mańczyk, I, 1989
)
0.77
" The pharmacokinetic data show initially a larger volume of distribution and a shortening of distribution halflife."( [Pharmacokinetic studies on the causes of increased neurotoxicity of lidocaine during heart surgery].
Burkhardt, U; Deutrich, C; Olthoff, D; Vetter, B, 1989
)
0.51
"The influence of drug sorption on the measurement of dose and blood concentrations during pharmacokinetic studies of chlormethiazole and lignocaine in a chronically catheterized sheep preparation has been examined."( The influence of drug sorption on pharmacokinetic studies of chlormethiazole and lignocaine.
Mather, LE; Runciman, WB; Upton, RN, 1987
)
0.27
" Lignocaine has a narrow toxic/therapeutic index, so that pharmacokinetic factors are critical in dose selection."( The pharmacokinetics of lignocaine and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Gagne, G; Nattel, S; Pineau, M, 1987
)
0.27
" The terminal half-life and renal clearance of tocainide were not altered by either H2-receptor antagonists, compared with placebo."( The effect of histamine-2 receptor antagonists on tocainide pharmacokinetics.
Kapil, RP; Lalonde, RL; Mattern, AL; North, DS, 1988
)
0.27
" However, no significant differences were found in the parameters of Cmax, Tmax or AUC for the two salts, and the serum levels in both groups at all times were well below the levels known to produce systemic toxicity."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of carbonated local anesthetics. III: Interscalene brachial block model.
Sukhani, R; Winnie, AP, 1989
)
0.28
" Cmax plasma levels for normal patients (5."( Interscalene brachial plexus blockade with lidocaine in chronic renal failure--a pharmacokinetic study.
Cunningham, AJ; McEllistrem, RF; O'Malley, K; O'Toole, D; Schell, J, 1989
)
0.54
" On the other hand, the elimination half-life of antiarrhythmic agents that have a large volume of distribution and are highly cleared by the liver may be twice as long in patients with CHF compared with normal subjects."( Effects of congestive heart failure on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antiarrhythmic agents.
Echt, DS; Roden, DM; Woosley, RL, 1986
)
0.27
" The absorption of lidocaine could be described by a single first order absorption process, characterized by a half-life of 71 +/- 17 min in five out of six patients."( Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine and bupivacaine following subarachnoid administration in surgical patients: simultaneous investigation of absorption and disposition kinetics using stable isotopes.
Breimer, DD; Burm, AG; Olthof, G; Spierdijk, J; Van Kleef, JW; Vermeulen, NP, 1988
)
0.93
"The comparative pharmacokinetic properties of lidocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine and mepivacaine were investigated in convulsing and non-convulsing dogs."( Alterations in the pharmacokinetic properties of amide local anaesthetics following local anaesthetic induced convulsions.
Arthur, GR; Covino, BG; Feldman, HS, 1988
)
0.53
" However, the balance between these changes in Vd beta and Cl did not result in a significant difference in the elimination half-life of lidocaine (38."( Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine in nonpregnant and pregnant ewes.
Arthur, GR; Covino, BG; Finster, M; Morishima, HO; Pedersen, H; Santos, AC, 1988
)
0.8
" The approach is to build a pharmacokinetic model for the disposition of the drug and then calculate backwards from the desired output function to derive the optimal input infusion function."( Optimal pharmacokinetic delivery of infused drugs: application to the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias.
Ahuja, AA; Martin, P, 1988
)
0.27
"The clearance (CL), volume of distribution (Vd) and elimination half-life (t1/2), based on unbound and total concentration-time data, were estimated using two serum lidocaine concentrations drawn approximately 6 and 12 hours after the initiation of continuous intravenous lidocaine therapy in nine patients with myocardial infarction (MI) (in the immediate postinfarct period) and in 12 patients with ventricular arrhythmias."( Rapid estimation of unbound lidocaine clearance in cardiac patients: implications for reducing toxicity.
Denson, DD; Ernst, TF; Grummich, KW; Thomas, RL; Toltzis, RJ; Youngs, CH, 1988
)
0.76
"499 L/h/kg and its half-life was 15."( Pharmacokinetics of methylprednisolone succinate, methylprednisolone, and lidocaine in the normal dog and during hemorrhagic shock.
Alvinerie, M; Autefage, A; Oukessou, M; Toutain, PL, 1987
)
0.5
" A novel universal elementary dosing regimen (uedr), that allows general pharmacokinetic modeling of these clinical regimens, is presented and developed mathematically."( Efficient pharmacokinetic modeling of complex clinical dosing regimens: the universal elementary dosing regimen and computer algorithm EDFAST.
Kreeft, JH; Sebaldt, RJ, 1987
)
0.27
" The plasma elimination half-life of lidocaine was markedly shortened after rifampicin treatment, due to a diminished volume of distribution."( Influence of enhanced alpha-1-acid glycoprotein concentration on protein binding, pharmacokinetics and antiarrhythmic effect of lidocaine in the dog.
Belpaire, FM; Bogaert, MG; De Rick, AF; Dello, C, 1987
)
0.75
" One-, two-, or three-compartment models were fitted to drug and metabolite blood concentration-time profiles and clearance, volume (Vss), and half-life values were calculated and compared by paired t-test."( The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lignocaine and MEGX in healthy subjects.
Elliott, HL; Kelman, AW; Meredith, PA; Thomson, AH; Whiting, B, 1987
)
0.27
" The pharmacokinetic behaviour of both agents was consistent with a 2-compartment open model and two parallel first-order absorption processes."( Pharmacokinetics of lignocaine and bupivacaine in surgical patients following epidural administration. Simultaneous investigation of absorption and disposition kinetics using stable isotopes.
Breimer, DD; Burm, AG; de Boer, AG; Spierdijk, J; van Kleef, JW; Vermeulen, NP, 1987
)
0.27
" This pharmacokinetic interaction was not the result of a lidocaine-induced decrease in the fraction of verapamil bound to plasma protein because in vitro lidocaine failed to displace verapamil from its protein binding site."( Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between lidocaine and verapamil.
Abernethy, DR; Chelly, JE; Dlewati, A; Doursout, MF; Hill, DC; Merin, RG, 1987
)
0.76
"We investigated the influence of bias in the estimates of the population pharmacokinetic parameters on the performance of Bayesian feedback in achieving a desired drug serum concentration."( Estimates of the population pharmacokinetic parameters and performance of Bayesian feedback: a sensitivity analysis.
Steiner, C; Vozeh, S, 1987
)
0.27
" Pharmacokinetic data derived included the rate constants k21, k12 (drug movement between two compartments), k10 (elimination from the central compartment), and the volume of distribution (V beta)."( The influence of age on lignocaine pharmacokinetics in young puppies.
Brown, TC; Eyres, RL; Hastings, CL; Oppenheim, RC, 1986
)
0.27
" The aim of this work was to determine the effect of mechanical ventilation on pharmacokinetic parameters of lidocaine, which is a well-known nonrestrictive elimination drug at the hepatic level."( Effect of mechanical ventilation on hepatic drug pharmacokinetics.
Auzépy, P; Berdeaux, A; Delion, F; Giudicelli, JF; Richard, C; Rimailho, A; Riou, B, 1986
)
0.48
" In addition to changing serum drug concentration/response relationships, the pharmacokinetic behavior of drugs bound to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein should also change."( Hepatic drug clearance following traumatic injury.
Hassett, JM; Slaughter, RL, 1985
)
0.27
" The mean plasma half-life was 15."( Pharmacokinetics and haemodynamic effects of tocainide in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular failure.
Bakshi, M; Branagan, P; Kelly, JG; MacMahon, B; Walsh, MJ, 1985
)
0.27
" There were no significant differences between normotensive and preeclamptic patients in the total dose of lidocaine, peak maternal plasma concentration, volume of distribution, maternal elimination half-life and umbilical vein/maternal vein ratios."( The pharmacokinetics and maternal and neonatal effects of epidural lidocaine in preeclampsia.
Bottorff, M; Jeter, JN; Khalil, M; Ramanathan, J; Sibai, BM, 1986
)
0.72
"In spite of the increasing use of intravenous lidocaine in the operating room, no pharmacokinetic data exist for intravenous lidocaine in children."( Lidocaine pharmacokinetics in children during general anesthesia.
DiFazio, CA; Finholt, DA; Moscicki, JC; Stirt, JA, 1986
)
1.97
" Lidocaine pharmacokinetic parameters were unchanged in the presence of amiodarone."( Effect of amiodarone on the pharmacokinetics of phenytoin, quinidine, and lidocaine in the rat.
DiGregorio, GJ; Fruncillo, RJ; Kozin, SH, 1985
)
1.41
" The peak concentration of lidocaine was detected within 30 minutes."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of local analgesia for laparoscopic tubal ligations.
Hulka, JF; Mueller, RA; Ostheimer, GW; Spielman, FJ, 1983
)
0.56
" In 9 with total renal failure, the plasma half-life ranged from 16."( Pharmacokinetics of tocainide in patients with renal dysfunction and during haemodialysis.
Augustin, J; Graffner, C; Hanrath, P; Kuck, KH; Pottage, A; Runge, M; Wiegers, U, 1983
)
0.27
" In one patient with active hepatic necrosis the terminal plasma half-life was 57."( Pharmacokinetics of tocainide in patients with combined hepatic and renal dysfunction.
Endell, W; Oltmanns, D; Pottage, A, 1983
)
0.27
"This article reviews clinical pharmacokinetic data on 8 new antiarrhythmic agents."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of the newer antiarrhythmic agents.
Gillis, AM; Kates, RE,
)
0.13
" Compared with pair-fed control rats, pentobarbital demonstrated a significantly prolonged clearance and elimination half-life without a change in volume of distribution."( Pharmacokinetics of pentobarbital, quinidine, lidocaine, and theophylline in the thermally injured rat.
DiGregorio, GJ; Fruncillo, RJ, 1984
)
0.53
" The data showed circadian variations of pharmacokinetic parameters:--Elimination half-life: max."( Effect of the hour of administration on the pharmacokinetics of lidocaine in the rat.
Bouyard, L; Bouyard, P; Bruguerolle, B; Jadot, G; Valli, M,
)
0.37
" Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed identical absorption and elimination constants."( Pharmacokinetics and neural blockade after subarachnoid lidocaine in the rhesus monkey. III. Effects of phenylephrine.
Bridenbaugh, PO; Denson, DD; Thompson, GA; Turner, PA, 1984
)
0.51
" The therapeutic dose, clearance, extraction coefficient, bioavailability and half-life are the object of particular study."( [Pharmacokinetics of anti-arrhythmics. 2. Clinical applications].
Bricaud, H; Lévy, RH; Lévy, S, 1980
)
0.26
" Pharmacokinetic of propranolol, phenytoin and lidocain was studied in groups of male "Fauve de Bourgogne" rabbits."( [Pharmacokinetics of propranolol, phenytoin and lidocaine in hypercholesterolemic rabbits].
Albin, H; Pehourcq, F; Ploux, D; Vinçon, G,
)
0.39
" There was no significant change in the elimination half-life for either drug in the presence of cimetidine."( Effect of cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics of quinidine and lidocaine in the rat.
DiGregorio, GJ; Fruncillo, RJ; Soll, A, 1983
)
0.51
"A sensitive and reliable animal model for the objective physiologic and pharmacokinetic evaluation of spinal anesthesia has been developed."( Neural blockade and pharmacokinetics following subarachnoid lidocaine in the rhesus monkey. I. Effects of epinephrine.
Bridenbaugh, PO; Denson, DD; Phero, JC; Raj, PP; Turner, PA, 1982
)
0.51
" Average individual values of distribution volumes in stationary condition and in the stage of elimination, clearance and half-life differed but insignificantly for trimecain and lidocain."( [Pharmacokinetic characteristics of trimecaine compared to lidocaine in myocardial infarct patients].
Metelitsa, VI; Piotrovskiĭ, VK; Riabokon', OS; Smirnova, EB, 1982
)
0.51
"The pharmacokinetic parameters of lidocaine are pertinent to the determination of both appropriate loading doses and constant infusion rates that achieve a therapeutic plasma concentration while avoiding toxicity."( Pharmacokinetic principles of lidocaine dosing in relation to disease state.
Waller, ES, 1981
)
0.83
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for each animal based on arterial blood concentrations of lidocaine."( A comparison of intravenous and subarachnoid lidocaine pharmacokinetics in the rhesus monkey.
Bridenbaugh, PO; Denson, DD; Ohlweiler, DF; Ritschel, WA; Turner, PA,
)
0.61
"This study investigated plasma concentration profiles, pharmacokinetic characteristics and side-effects of lidocaine following 3 different administration techniques."( The technique of endobronchial lidocaine administration does not influence plasma concentration profiles and pharmacokinetic parameters in humans.
Läer, S; Reymann, A; Scholz, H; Scholz, J; Schulte am Esch, J; Steinfath, M, 1995
)
0.79
" The calculated CLH values were then compared to literature values of clearance (CL) to the same metabolite obtained during pharmacokinetic studies in humans."( Predicting the hepatic clearance of xenobiotics in humans from in vitro data.
Hoener, BA, 1994
)
0.29
" In an attempt to discriminate between a pharmacokinetic and a pharmacodynamic (or both) origin to these differences, we used an isolated rabbit heart model with constant coronary inflow to compare the myocardial uptake and disposition kinetics of lidocaine and bupivacaine."( Myocardial uptake of bupivacaine: I. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lidocaine and bupivacaine in the isolated perfused rabbit heart.
Boïco, O; Kantelip, JP; Mazoit, JX; Orhant, EE; Samii, K, 1993
)
0.7
" Net myocardial lignocaine uptake lasted for approximately 60 s--this was much shorter than the reported initial distribution half-life of lignocaine."( IV bolus administration of subconvulsive doses of lignocaine to conscious sheep: myocardial pharmacokinetics.
Huang, YF; Runciman, WB; Upton, RN, 1993
)
0.29
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with a noncompartimental method and compared by means of the Kruskal-Wallis test."( Pharmacokinetics of vinorelbine in patients with liver metastases.
Aita, P; Borsatti, E; Cannizzaro, R; Freschi, A; Galligioni, E; Monfardini, S; Robieux, I; Sorio, R; Vitali, V, 1996
)
0.29
" Terminal elimination half-life and apparent volume of distribution were not significantly different among groups."( Pharmacokinetics of vinorelbine in patients with liver metastases.
Aita, P; Borsatti, E; Cannizzaro, R; Freschi, A; Galligioni, E; Monfardini, S; Robieux, I; Sorio, R; Vitali, V, 1996
)
0.29
" laboratory and pharmacodynamic tests, as well as pharmacokinetic assays were performed prior to the operation as well as 10-12 days after the bile duct ligation."( Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine and its major metabolite- monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) in rabbits with experimental common bile duct obstruction.
Barcew-Wiszniewska, B; Droździk, M; Gawrońska-Szklarz, B; Gołdyn, U; Rózewicka, L; Skowron, J; Sulikowski, T; Wójcicki, J; Wójcicki, M,
)
0.45
" Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to reach Cmax (Tmax) were obtained for all the patients except one who needed a supplementary injection and was excluded from the study."( The role of hyaluronidase on lidocaine and bupivacaine pharmacokinetics after peribulbar blockade.
Adenis, JP; Benrhaiem, M; Debord, J; Feiss, P; Lachatre, G; Lotfi, H; Nathan, N; Rigaud, G, 1996
)
0.59
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived for CCIP administration of lidocaine in patients with chronic pain."( Derivation and cross-validation of pharmacokinetic parameters for computer-controlled infusion of lidocaine in pain therapy.
Brose, W; Gaeta, R; Gregg, KM; Minto, CF; Schnider, TW; Shafer, SL, 1996
)
0.75
" From the observations in these eight patients, new lidocaine pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated."( Derivation and cross-validation of pharmacokinetic parameters for computer-controlled infusion of lidocaine in pain therapy.
Brose, W; Gaeta, R; Gregg, KM; Minto, CF; Schnider, TW; Shafer, SL, 1996
)
0.76
" The pharmacokinetic parameters estimated from these eight patients differed from the initial estimates and included a central volume one-sixth of the initial estimate."( Derivation and cross-validation of pharmacokinetic parameters for computer-controlled infusion of lidocaine in pain therapy.
Brose, W; Gaeta, R; Gregg, KM; Minto, CF; Schnider, TW; Shafer, SL, 1996
)
0.51
" After oral lidocaine, cirrhotic patients has a longer time to peak concentration (Tmax) and elimination half-life (t1/2), and a higher area under the curve (AUC)."( Pharmacokinetics of oral lidocaine and nifedipine in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Klangwarnwong, D; Manorot, M; Praisontarangkul, OA; Tonsuwannont, W, 1996
)
0.98
" Terminal half-life (t1/2), was significantly longer in nonascitic patients than in control subjects (32 vs 22 min)."( Effect of moderate or severe liver dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid.
Ferrara, SD; Frison, G; Mazzo, M; Orlando, R; Padrini, R; Palatini, P; Tedeschi, L; Zordan, R, 1996
)
0.29
" Pharmacokinetic parameters determined from an independent compartment model were not different from those observed after an epidural administration of lidocaine via the sacrococcygeal space in children, except for a wide variability in the time taken to reach the maximum concentration (27."( Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine with epinephrine in piglets following epidural anaesthesia.
Bouquet, S; Caritez, JC; Carretier, M; Fusciardi, J; Karayan, J; Lacoste, L; Péchier, JM; Rouffineau, J, 1996
)
0.82
" Life adrenaline, it may decrease lignocaine peak concentration (Cmax), thus leading to decreased toxicity."( Clonidine and or adrenaline decrease lignocaine plasma peak concentration after epidural injection.
Benhamou, D; Mazoit, JX; Samii, K; Veillette, Y, 1996
)
0.29
"The influence of selected general anesthetics: thiopental, propofol, ketamine and pentobarbital on the lidocaine pharmacokinetic parameters was studied in rabbits."( The influence of selected general anesthetics on pharmacokinetic parameters of some antiarrhythmic drugs in rabbits. Part IV. Lidocaine.
Orszulak-Michalak, D,
)
0.55
"2 mg/kg; elimination half-life 113."( The pharmacokinetics of epidural lidocaine and bupivacaine during cesarean section.
Arney, TL; Downing, JW; Gonzalez, HF; Herman, NL; Johnson, HV; Johnson, RF, 1997
)
0.58
"Although no antiarrhythmic agent has ideal pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, it is useful to evaluate antiarrhythmic agents in terms this ideal profile."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous agents for ventricular arrhythmias.
Nolan, PE,
)
0.13
" The method was applied to a pharmacokinetic study of lidocaine and bupivacaine during peribulbar anesthesia in ocular surgery."( Simultaneous determination of lidocaine and bupivacaine in human plasma: application to pharmacokinetics.
Ben Rhaiem, M; Debord, J; Dreyfuss, MF; Feiss, P; Lachâtre, G; Lotfi, H; Marquet, P, 1997
)
0.83
" A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model based on apparent tissue-tissue clearances and local blood flow to tissues is presented which adequately describes the concentration-time profiles of lidocaine in underlying tissues after dermal application."( Dermal and underlying tissue pharmacokinetics of lidocaine after topical application.
Roberts, MS; Singh, P, 1994
)
0.73
" The concentration-depth profiles for solutes in underlying tissues with variable blood flows were described by a compartment-in-series pharmacokinetic model in which each tissue's blood flows to and from a central compartment were incorporated."( Effects of vasoconstriction on dermal pharmacokinetics and local tissue distribution of compounds.
Roberts, MS; Singh, P, 1994
)
0.29
" There were no differences in pharmacokinetic parameters for lidocaine between the UT and PB groups."( Effect of phenobarbital on the pharmacokinetics of lidocaine, monoethylglycinexylidide and 3-hydroxylidocaine in the rat: correlation with P450 isoform levels.
Fujimori, M; Funae, Y; Imaoka, S; Nakamoto, T; Oda, Y, 1997
)
0.79
" LD, 2 mg/kg intravenous (IV) bolus, (n = 11) was given to estimate pharmacokinetic variables."( Lidocaine pharmacokinetics and toxicity in newborn pigs.
Haaland, K; Hoem, NO; Johannessen, SI; Satas, S; Sørensen, DR; Thoresen, M, 1997
)
1.74
" The data also suggest that the mechanism is largely pharmacokinetic in nature."( Pharmacokinetic nature of tachyphylaxis to lidocaine: peripheral nerve blocks and infiltration anesthesia in rats.
Birknes, JK; Choi, RH; Kissin, I; Popitz-Bergez, FA; Strichartz, GR, 1997
)
0.56
" To date, pharmacokinetic analysis of pulmonary drug uptake has been only semiquantitative and ill-suited for relating pharmacodynamics to pharmacokinetics or for estimating the time course of the fraction of drug dose residing in the lung during a single pass."( A recirculatory model of the pulmonary uptake and pharmacokinetics of lidocaine based on analysis of arterial and mixed venous data from dogs.
Avram, MJ; Gentry, WB; Henthorn, TK; Janowski, MP; Krejcie, TC; Niemann, CU, 1997
)
0.53
"The pharmacokinetic behaviour of oxytetracycline (OTC) was studied in 11 sheep after intravenous and intramuscular administration at a single dosage of 20 mg kg(-1) bodyweight."( Pharmacokinetics of oxytetracycline after intramuscular administration with lidocaine in sheep, comparison with a conventional formulation.
Carceles, CM; Guimerá, ME; Moreno, L; Serrano, JM,
)
0.36
"To evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of morphine and lidocaine after a single intravenous dose in critically ill patients."( The pharmacokinetics of morphine and lidocaine in critically ill patients.
Almog, S; Berkenstadt, H; Ezra, D; Mayan, H; Perel, A; Rotenberg, M; Segal, E, 1999
)
0.82
" No correlation was found between clinical variables and pharmacokinetic parameters of both drugs (ANOVA)."( The pharmacokinetics of morphine and lidocaine in critically ill patients.
Almog, S; Berkenstadt, H; Ezra, D; Mayan, H; Perel, A; Rotenberg, M; Segal, E, 1999
)
0.58
"We introduced the pharmacokinetic method into the functional evaluation of xenogeneic extracorporeal liver perfusion as an artificial liver assist device, and examined the influence of xenogeneic humoral injury on the metabolic function of xenoperfused pig livers."( Evaluation of ammonia and lidocaine clearance, and galactose elimination capacity of xenoperfused pig livers using a pharmacokinetic analysis.
Ikai, I; Iwata, H; Kanazawa, A; Katura, N; Nishitai, R; Okabe, H; Satoh, S; Takeyama, O; Terajima, H; Uesugi, T; Yagi, T; Yamaoka, Y; Yoneyama, T, 1999
)
0.6
" Clearance (CL) of ammonia and lidocaine, and galactose elimination capacity (Vmax) were determined at three points during the perfusion using a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model."( Evaluation of ammonia and lidocaine clearance, and galactose elimination capacity of xenoperfused pig livers using a pharmacokinetic analysis.
Ikai, I; Iwata, H; Kanazawa, A; Katura, N; Nishitai, R; Okabe, H; Satoh, S; Takeyama, O; Terajima, H; Uesugi, T; Yagi, T; Yamaoka, Y; Yoneyama, T, 1999
)
0.89
" Pharmacokinetic parameters of lidocaine were similar to those published earlier (T1/2beta: 110+/-16 min; CI: 12."( Lidocaine pharmacokinetics during hyperbaric hyperoxia in humans.
Fischer, DC; Kalff, G; Rump, AF; Siekmann, U, 1999
)
2.03
"25 MPa may be caused by pharmacodynamic interactions between lidocaine and hyperbaric/hyperoxic conditions."( Lidocaine pharmacokinetics during hyperbaric hyperoxia in humans.
Fischer, DC; Kalff, G; Rump, AF; Siekmann, U, 1999
)
1.99
" Because epinephrine is also an alpha2-adrenergic receptor agonist, it is possible that epinephrine prolongs local anesthetic block by a pharmacodynamic mechanism and not a pharmacokinetic one."( Effect of epinephrine on lidocaine clearance in vivo: a microdialysis study in humans.
Bernards, CM; Kopacz, DJ, 1999
)
0.61
" There was no evidence of a pharmacodynamic effect of epinephrine."( Effect of epinephrine on lidocaine clearance in vivo: a microdialysis study in humans.
Bernards, CM; Kopacz, DJ, 1999
)
0.61
"To study the pharmacokinetic parameters of morphine and lidocaine after a single intravenous (i."( The pharmacokinetics of morphine and lidocaine in nine severe trauma patients.
Almog, S; Berkenstadt, H; Ezra, D; Mayan, H; Perel, A; Rotenberg, M; Segal, E, 1999
)
0.82
"To apply a population pharmacodynamic model to small-dose hypobaric spinal anesthesia for outpatient laparoscopy."( Selective spinal anesthesia for outpatient laparoscopy. IV: population pharmacodynamic modelling.
Collins, L; Mitchell, GW; Sun, H; Vaghadia, H, 2001
)
0.31
"A population pharmacodynamic model was applied to low-dose hypobaric lidocaine spinal anesthesia."( Selective spinal anesthesia for outpatient laparoscopy. IV: population pharmacodynamic modelling.
Collins, L; Mitchell, GW; Sun, H; Vaghadia, H, 2001
)
0.55
"Inclusion of cardiac output and other physiologic parameters, in addition to or instead of, demographic variables might improve the population pharmacokinetic modeling of lidocaine."( Modeling population pharmacokinetics of lidocaine: should cardiac output be included as a patient factor?
Boer, F; Bovill, JG; Burm, AG; de Roode, A; Kuipers, JA; Olofsen, E, 2001
)
0.77
"Thirty-one patients were included in a population pharmacokinetic study of lidocaine."( Modeling population pharmacokinetics of lidocaine: should cardiac output be included as a patient factor?
Boer, F; Bovill, JG; Burm, AG; de Roode, A; Kuipers, JA; Olofsen, E, 2001
)
0.81
"Inclusion of cardiac output resulted in a significant improvement of the pharmacokinetic model, but inclusion of demographic covariates was even better."( Modeling population pharmacokinetics of lidocaine: should cardiac output be included as a patient factor?
Boer, F; Bovill, JG; Burm, AG; de Roode, A; Kuipers, JA; Olofsen, E, 2001
)
0.58
"The aim of the study was to investigate the cutaneous bioequivalence of a lipophilic model drug (lidocaine) applied in a novel topical microemulsion vehicle, compared to a conventional oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion, assessed by a pharmacokinetics microdialysis model and a pharmacodynamic method."( Influence of a microemulsion vehicle on cutaneous bioequivalence of a lipophilic model drug assessed by microdialysis and pharmacodynamics.
Burggraaf, J; Cohen, AF; Kemme, MJ; Kreilgaard, M; Schoemaker, RC, 2001
)
0.53
" Absorption coefficients and lag times were determined by pharmacokinetic modelling of the microdialysis data."( Influence of a microemulsion vehicle on cutaneous bioequivalence of a lipophilic model drug assessed by microdialysis and pharmacodynamics.
Burggraaf, J; Cohen, AF; Kemme, MJ; Kreilgaard, M; Schoemaker, RC, 2001
)
0.31
" The compartmental pharmacokinetic model provided an excellent fit of the concentration-time curves with reliable estimation of absorption coefficient and lag time."( Influence of a microemulsion vehicle on cutaneous bioequivalence of a lipophilic model drug assessed by microdialysis and pharmacodynamics.
Burggraaf, J; Cohen, AF; Kemme, MJ; Kreilgaard, M; Schoemaker, RC, 2001
)
0.31
" The microdialysis technique combined with an appropriate pharmacokinetic model provides a high sensitivity in bioequivalence studies of topically applied substances."( Influence of a microemulsion vehicle on cutaneous bioequivalence of a lipophilic model drug assessed by microdialysis and pharmacodynamics.
Burggraaf, J; Cohen, AF; Kemme, MJ; Kreilgaard, M; Schoemaker, RC, 2001
)
0.31
"The purpose of our study was to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model describing the behavior of lidocaine in humans by scaling up physiological variables from animal models of cardiac arrest."( Prediction of lidocaine tissue concentrations following different dose regimes during cardiac arrest using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model.
Grillo, JA; Ornato, JP; Venitz, J, 2001
)
0.88
" Whether clonidine prolongs local anesthetic block by a pharmacokinetic effect or a pharmacodynamic effect is unclear."( Effect of clonidine on lidocaine clearance in vivo: a microdialysis study in humans.
Bernards, CM; Kopacz, DJ, 2001
)
0.62
" The pharmacokinetic data suggest that the mechanism of prolongation is at least in part pharmacokinetic."( Effect of clonidine on lidocaine clearance in vivo: a microdialysis study in humans.
Bernards, CM; Kopacz, DJ, 2001
)
0.62
"The object of this study was to investigate the influence of midazolam on the plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters of lidocaine in rabbits."( The influence of midazolam on plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters of lidocaine in rabbits.
Orszulak-Michalak, D; Owczarek, J; Wiktorowska-Owczarek, AK, 2002
)
0.74
"Our objective was to elucidate the mechanism of pharmacokinetic interaction between lidocaine and mexiletine, because an unexpected increase in plasma lidocaine concentration accompanied by severe side effects was observed when mexiletine was administered to a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy."( Possible mechanism for pharmacokinetic interaction between lidocaine and mexiletine.
Fukuzawa, M; Funakoshi, S; Kugaya, Y; Maeda, Y; Murakami, T; Nakamura, M; Takano, M; Tsukiai, S; Yamasaki, M, 2002
)
0.78
" This pharmacokinetic interaction was not attributable to a metabolic interaction as evaluated by plasma lidocaine metabolites concentrations."( Possible mechanism for pharmacokinetic interaction between lidocaine and mexiletine.
Fukuzawa, M; Funakoshi, S; Kugaya, Y; Maeda, Y; Murakami, T; Nakamura, M; Takano, M; Tsukiai, S; Yamasaki, M, 2002
)
0.77
" In this randomized, prospective, multiple-dose, open-label pharmacokinetic study, lidocaine patches were applied to healthy men and women for three consecutive days."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of continuously applied lidocaine patches 5%.
Alvarez, NA; Galer, BS; Gammaitoni, AR, 2002
)
0.79
"Erythromycin caused statistically significant, although limited, modifications of lignocaine and MEGX pharmacokinetic parameters."( Effect of the CYP3A4 inhibitor erythromycin on the pharmacokinetics of lignocaine and its pharmacologically active metabolites in subjects with normal and impaired liver function.
De Martin, S; Orlando, R; Padrini, R; Palatini, P; Piccoli, P, 2003
)
0.32
" A pharmacodynamic study following lignocaine infusion to steady state appears necessary to assess the actual clinical relevance of these combined effects."( Effect of the CYP3A4 inhibitor erythromycin on the pharmacokinetics of lignocaine and its pharmacologically active metabolites in subjects with normal and impaired liver function.
De Martin, S; Orlando, R; Padrini, R; Palatini, P; Piccoli, P, 2003
)
0.32
"The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of experimental diabetes on pharmacokinetic parameters of lidocaine and its metabolite monoethyl-glycylxylidide (MEGX) after a single intravenous administration in rats."( Effect of experimental diabetes on pharmacokinetic parameters of lidocaine and MEGX in rats.
Gawrońska-Szklarz, B; Musiał, DH; Paprota, B; Pawlik, A,
)
0.58
" The tmax and toxicity data were obtained from the literature."( Lipophilicity affects the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of local anaesthetic agents administered by caudal block.
Bello-Ramírez, AM; Nava-Ocampo, AA,
)
0.13
" A comparison is also presented between several methods based on animal pharmacokinetic data, using the same set of proprietary compounds, and it lends further support for the use of this method, as opposed to methods that require the gathering of pharmacokinetic data in laboratory animals."( Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
Gao, F; Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Shalaeva, MY, 2004
)
0.32
" Toxic effects are proportional to amount of drug administered and the plasma concentration of the drug, allowing predictions of safety following pharmacokinetic studies."( Pharmacokinetics of combined intraperitoneal and incisional lidocaine in the dog following ovariohysterectomy.
Barnes, KS; Hauptman, JG; Wilson, DV, 2004
)
0.57
"Stress can modify local anesthetics pharmacokinetic properties, resulting in alterations both in their concentration in serum and their protein binding in mandibular bone."( Effect of various stress models on lidocaine pharmacokinetic properties in the mandible after masseter injection.
Alexopoulos, C; Dannis, C; Lolis, E; Mourouzis, C; Saranteas, T; Tesseromatis, C, 2004
)
0.6
" The pharmacokinetic parameters were: half-life t1/2alpha 24."( Pharmacokinetics and transplacental transfer of lidocaine and its metabolite for perineal analgesic assistance to pregnant women.
Cavalli, Rde C; da Cunha, SP; Dantas, EC; de Duarte, LB; de Prado, MF; Duarte, G; Lanchote, VL, 2004
)
0.58
"Lidocaine administered by the perineal route presented a tmax of 15 min, significantly lower than when the drug was administered peridurally, revealing that the time between administration and the occurrence of the analgesic effect was shorter."( Pharmacokinetics and transplacental transfer of lidocaine and its metabolite for perineal analgesic assistance to pregnant women.
Cavalli, Rde C; da Cunha, SP; Dantas, EC; de Duarte, LB; de Prado, MF; Duarte, G; Lanchote, VL, 2004
)
2.02
" No statistically significant differences were observed in any of the pharmacokinetic parameters; peak concentrations, concentration peak times or elimination half-lives of lidocaine or monoethylglycinexylidide."( Effect of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of inhaled lidocaine.
Isohanni, MH; Neuvonen, PJ; Olkkola, KT, 2004
)
0.76
" Most lidocaine pharmacokinetic variables also differed between groups."( Influence of general anesthesia on pharmacokinetics of intravenous lidocaine infusion in horses.
Feary, DJ; Mama, KR; Thomasy, S; Wagner, AE, 2005
)
1.05
" The aim of the present experiments was to establish the influence of methohexital on the plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters of lidocaine in rabbits."( The influence of methohexital on plasma concentration and pharmacokinetic parameters of lidocaine in rabbits.
Orszulak-Michalak, D; Owczarek, J; Wiktorowska-Owczarek, AK, 2004
)
0.75
"Human pharmacokinetic parameters are often predicted prior to clinical study from in vivo preclinical pharmacokinetic data."( Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
Jolivette, LJ; Ward, KW, 2005
)
0.33
"In pharmacokinetic studies of hepatic impairment, including all classes of cirrhosis may be more revealing than including only selected classes of liver failure."( Pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in patients with moderate to severe liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh classes A, B, and C): characterization by dynamic liver function tests.
Brockmöller, J; Coupez, R; Lochs, H; Roots, I; Thomsen, T; Wittstock, M, 2005
)
0.33
"To evaluate the effect of protein binding of pilsicainide on its clearance and the contribution of protein binding to optimized pilsicainide therapy, clinical laboratory and pharmacokinetic data were studied in 160 Japanese inpatients (Study 1) and 18 Japanese inpatients (Study 2)."( Effect of protein binding of pilsicainide on the pharmacokinetics.
Fukumoto, K; Kamakura, S; Kusumoto, M; Matsumoto, K; Tanemura, M; Tsuchishita, Y; Ueno, K, 2005
)
0.33
"Anesthesia with isoflurane significantly decreased the volume of the central compartment, clearance, and elimination half-life of lidocaine and significantly increased the extrapolated plasma drug concentration at time 0, compared with values for awake cats."( Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine and its active metabolite, monoethylglycinexylidide, after intravenous administration of lidocaine to awake and isoflurane-anesthetized cats.
Ilkiw, JE; Pypendop, BH; Stanley, SD; Thomasy, SM, 2005
)
0.86
" When pharmacokinetic variables are used to determine loading and infusion doses in awake or anesthetized cats, they should be measured in cats that are awake or anesthetized, respectively."( Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine and its active metabolite, monoethylglycinexylidide, after intravenous administration of lidocaine to awake and isoflurane-anesthetized cats.
Ilkiw, JE; Pypendop, BH; Stanley, SD; Thomasy, SM, 2005
)
0.65
"Ciprofloxacin increased the mean peak concentration and area under plasma concentration-time curve of lidocaine by 12% (range [-6] to+46%; P<0."( Effect of ciprofloxin on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous lidocaine.
Ahonen, J; Isohanni, MH; Neuvonen, PJ; Olkkola, KT, 2005
)
0.79
" Population pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis was also performed using an effect compartment model."( Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of a class IC antiarrhythmic, pilsicainide, in patients with cardiac arrhythmias.
Echizen, H; Kishi, R; Kobayashi, S; Masuhara, K; Matsumoto, N; Mihara, K; Miyake, F; Nakazawa, K; Ogawa, R; Takagi, A; Takahashi, H, 2006
)
0.33
"Lidocaine is increasingly used in transdermal drug delivery systems for different pain conditions in human medicine whereby several pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated minimal systemic absorption in men."( Pharmacokinetics of a lidocaine patch 5% in dogs.
Baert, K; Croubels, S; De Backer, P; Gasthuys, F; Polis, I; Weiland, L, 2006
)
2.09
"Availability of pharmacokinetic data for horses with gastrointestinal tract disease will facilitate appropriate clinical dosing of lidocaine."( Influence of gastrointestinal tract disease on pharmacokinetics of lidocaine after intravenous infusion in anesthetized horses.
Enns, RM; Feary, DJ; Mama, KR; Thomasy, SM; Wagner, AE, 2006
)
0.77
" Pharmacokinetic study with intravenous lidocaine (1 mg/kg) and blood sampling during 360 minutes from injection was performed before the HT initiation and after 3 and 6 months of HT."( Lidocaine pharmacokinetics in postmenopausal women on hormone therapy.
Drozdzik, M; Gawronska-Szklarz, B; Loniewski, I; Musial, HD; Pudlo, A; Zarzycki, M,
)
1.84
" In contrast, transdermal administration of HT did not influence pharmacokinetic parameters of the drug."( Lidocaine pharmacokinetics in postmenopausal women on hormone therapy.
Drozdzik, M; Gawronska-Szklarz, B; Loniewski, I; Musial, HD; Pudlo, A; Zarzycki, M,
)
1.57
" During the fluvoxamine phase the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak concentration (Cmax) of oral lidocaine were 305% (P<0."( Effect of fluvoxamine and erythromycin on the pharmacokinetics of oral lidocaine.
Isohanni, MH; Neuvonen, PJ; Olkkola, KT, 2006
)
0.77
"001), and half-life was approximately doubled (4."( Differential effect of chronic renal failure on the pharmacokinetics of lidocaine in patients receiving and not receiving hemodialysis.
Bertoli, M; De Martin, S; Orlando, R; Palatini, P; Pegoraro, P, 2006
)
0.57
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared with data from a previous study performed in healthy volunteers."( Pharmacokinetics of tilidine and naloxone in patients with severe hepatic impairment.
Brennscheidt, U; Brunnmüller, U; Proppe, D; Seiler, KU; Thomann, P, 2007
)
0.34
" Plasma lidocaine levels were determined in the course of 24 hours and were subjected to pharmacokinetic analysis."( Pharmacokinetics of high-dose diluted lidocaine in local anesthesia for facelift procedures.
Barak, Y; Bentur, Y; Hoffer, E; Ramon, Y; Ullmann, Y; Yarhi, D, 2007
)
1.05
"A pharmacokinetic model delineated the impact of GI transit, drug absorption rate, and first-pass metabolism on drug disposition following oral administration of HPMA copolymer-9-AC conjugate in rats."( Pharmacokinetic modeling of absorption behavior of 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC) released from colon-specific HPMA copolymer-9-AC conjugate in rats.
Gao, SQ; Kopecek, J; Kopecková, P; Peterson, CM; Sun, Y, 2008
)
0.35
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
"The purposes of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of epidural lidocaine in geriatric patients, to search for any difference in the PK behavior of epidural lidocaine when dopamine is given concurrently, and to develop a descriptive PK model from which to calculate dosage and infusion regimens of epidural lidocaine to define and achieve desired target goals in either the epidural or the serum compartment."( A population pharmacokinetic model of epidural lidocaine in geriatric patients: effects of low-dose dopamine.
Guilder, MV; Jelliffe, RW; Kwa, A; Sprung, J, 2008
)
0.82
" Pharmacokinetic parameters estimated for phentolamine, lidocaine, and epinephrine included peak plasma concentration (Cmax), time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to the last time point (AUClast) or from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf), elimination half-life (t1/2), clearance (CL), and volume of distribution (Vd)."( Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine with epinephrine following local anesthesia reversal with phentolamine mesylate.
Goodson, JM; Hersh, EV; Moore, PA; Navalta, L; Papas, AS; Rogy, S; Rutherford, B; Yagiela, JA, 2008
)
0.92
"Peridural blockade with lidocaine, bupivacaine, and fentanyl is an anesthetic procedure extensively used in obstetrics, justifying the pharmacokinetic study of these drugs during labor."( Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine and its metabolite in peridural anesthesia administered to pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Cavalli, Rde C; da Cunha, SP; Duarte, G; Duarte, Lde B; Lanchote, VL; Marques, MP; Moisés, EC, 2008
)
0.98
" Maternal blood samples were collected at predetermined times for the analysis of lidocaine and MEGX by chromatography and pharmacokinetic analysis."( Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine and its metabolite in peridural anesthesia administered to pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Cavalli, Rde C; da Cunha, SP; Duarte, G; Duarte, Lde B; Lanchote, VL; Marques, MP; Moisés, EC, 2008
)
0.9
" Whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (WB-PBPK) modelling is a predictive technique that quantitatively relates the pharmacokinetic parameters of a drug to such (patho-)physiological conditions."( Physiology-based simulations of a pathological condition: prediction of pharmacokinetics in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Edginton, AN; Willmann, S, 2008
)
0.35
" Predictions of pharmacokinetic profiles and parameters were compared with literature data for the model compounds alfentanil, lidocaine (lignocaine), theophylline and levetiracetam."( Physiology-based simulations of a pathological condition: prediction of pharmacokinetics in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Edginton, AN; Willmann, S, 2008
)
0.55
"The predicted versus observed plasma concentration-time profiles for alfentanil and lidocaine were similar, such that the pharmacokinetic changes associated with Child-Pugh class A, B and C liver cirrhosis were adequately described."( Physiology-based simulations of a pathological condition: prediction of pharmacokinetics in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Edginton, AN; Willmann, S, 2008
)
0.57
"Drug-drug interaction potentials of an herbal medicine named Glycyrrhiza uralensis was investigated in rats via in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic studies."( Study on the pharmacokinetics drug-drug interaction potential of Glycyrrhiza uralensis, a traditional Chinese medicine, with lidocaine in rats.
Song, X; Tang, J; Zhang, J; Zhu, M, 2009
)
0.56
"African green monkeys (vervets) have been proposed as an alternate species that might allow improved access and provide high-quality pharmacokinetic results comparable with other primates."( Exploration of the African green monkey as a preclinical pharmacokinetic model: oral pharmacokinetic parameters and drug-drug interactions.
Bhadresa, S; Coon, DJ; Lawrence, MS; Magiera, D; Struharik, M; Ward, KW, 2009
)
0.35
" Serum concentrations of nifedipine and lidocaine were determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography method in order to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters."( Pharmacokinetics of anorectal nifedipine and lidocaine (lignocaine) ointment following haemorrhoidectomy: an open-label, single-dose, phase IV clinical study.
Antropoli, C; Cerutti, R; Cusato, M; Dominici, P; Giannotti, G; Grossi, E; Perrotti, P; Regazzi, M, 2009
)
0.88
"8%), consistent with therapeutically negligible concentrations and insufficient to permit calculation of any pharmacokinetic parameters."( Pharmacokinetics of anorectal nifedipine and lidocaine (lignocaine) ointment following haemorrhoidectomy: an open-label, single-dose, phase IV clinical study.
Antropoli, C; Cerutti, R; Cusato, M; Dominici, P; Giannotti, G; Grossi, E; Perrotti, P; Regazzi, M, 2009
)
0.61
"The results of this study suggest that the pharmacokinetic profile of pilsicainide was not significantly different between these healthy Korean and Japanese male volunteers."( An open-label, single-dose, parallel-group, dose-increasing study comparing the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of pilsicainide hydrochloride in healthy Korean and Japanese male subjects.
Hong, JH; Jang, IJ; Kim, BH; Kim, JR; Kim, JW; Kim, KP; Lim, KS; Shin, SG; Tanaka, T; Yu, KS, 2009
)
0.35
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using a noncompartmental method."( Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine in serum and milk of mature Holstein cows.
Duran, SH; Givens, MD; Lin, HC; Ravis, WR; Riddell, MG; Sellers, G, 2009
)
0.68
"The primary objective was to evaluate the serum pharmacokinetic profile of a single 15-mg dose of extended-release epidural morphine (EREM) administered at the lower thoracic epidural space alone or following a lidocaine-epinephrine test dose in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery."( A randomized study of the serum pharmacokinetics of lower thoracic extended-release epidural morphine (DepoDur) after lidocaine-epinephrine test dose administration in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery.
Manvelian, GZ; Viscusi, ER, 2009
)
0.75
" Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters were determined based on the serum concentration-time profiles of morphine and morphine metabolites."( A randomized study of the serum pharmacokinetics of lower thoracic extended-release epidural morphine (DepoDur) after lidocaine-epinephrine test dose administration in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery.
Manvelian, GZ; Viscusi, ER, 2009
)
0.56
"The intent-to-treat and safety populations included 39 patients; the pharmacokinetic population included 37 patients."( A randomized study of the serum pharmacokinetics of lower thoracic extended-release epidural morphine (DepoDur) after lidocaine-epinephrine test dose administration in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery.
Manvelian, GZ; Viscusi, ER, 2009
)
0.56
" Tissue-to-plasma partition coefficients calculated from the total (protein-bound and unbound) and unbound concentrations in plasma and brain as well as pharmacokinetic parameters in plasma and cerebral extracellular fluid were compared among the three anesthetics."( Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine in plasma and brain in awake rats.
Asada, A; Hase, I; Ikeda, Y; Miyake, W; Nakamura, T; Oda, Y; Takahashi, R, 2010
)
0.68
"A 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model best describes the plasma concentrations of a 48-hour lidocaine infusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB."( Population pharmacokinetics of lidocaine administered during and after cardiac surgery.
Hsu, YW; Mathew, JP; Newman, MF; Somma, J, 2011
)
0.88
" In this study, we sought to determine the pharmacokinetic and drug effects of prior epidural lidocaine administration on EREM."( Prior epidural lidocaine alters the pharmacokinetics and drug effects of extended-release epidural morphine (DepoDur®) after cesarean delivery.
Atkinson Ralls, L; Carvalho, B; Clavijo, CF; Drover, DR, 2011
)
0.94
" Maximal concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (Tmax), and AUC(0-last) (area under the concentration-time curve until the last plasma concentration that was below the limit of quantitation) for morphine levels were determined from a plasma sample at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes, and 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 hours."( Prior epidural lidocaine alters the pharmacokinetics and drug effects of extended-release epidural morphine (DepoDur®) after cesarean delivery.
Atkinson Ralls, L; Carvalho, B; Clavijo, CF; Drover, DR, 2011
)
0.72
"Epidural lidocaine administration (20-35 mL) 1 hour before epidural EREM administration increased the Cmax in group E (11."( Prior epidural lidocaine alters the pharmacokinetics and drug effects of extended-release epidural morphine (DepoDur®) after cesarean delivery.
Atkinson Ralls, L; Carvalho, B; Clavijo, CF; Drover, DR, 2011
)
1.14
" The objective of this study was to develop an optimized dosing regimen for lidocaine in preterm as well as term neonates, using population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation."( Lidocaine (lignocaine) dosing regimen based upon a population pharmacokinetic model for preterm and term neonates with seizures.
de Vries, LS; Egberts, TC; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, AD; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van den Broek, MP; van Hasselt, JG, 2011
)
2.04
" Population pharmacokinetic modelling started with assessment of two important aspects of paediatric pharmacokinetics: relation to body size and the effects of maturation."( Lidocaine (lignocaine) dosing regimen based upon a population pharmacokinetic model for preterm and term neonates with seizures.
de Vries, LS; Egberts, TC; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, AD; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van den Broek, MP; van Hasselt, JG, 2011
)
1.81
" Based on this pharmacokinetic model, a dosing strategy for lidocaine for neonatal seizure control was developed, which allows rapid and safe administration of lidocaine in this population."( Lidocaine (lignocaine) dosing regimen based upon a population pharmacokinetic model for preterm and term neonates with seizures.
de Vries, LS; Egberts, TC; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, AD; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van den Broek, MP; van Hasselt, JG, 2011
)
2.05
"A lidocaine dosing regimen for seizure control in preterm and term neonates has been developed using population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation."( Lidocaine (lignocaine) dosing regimen based upon a population pharmacokinetic model for preterm and term neonates with seizures.
de Vries, LS; Egberts, TC; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, AD; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van den Broek, MP; van Hasselt, JG, 2011
)
2.53
"A sensitive, selective, and reproducible in-tube solid-phase microextraction and liquid chromatographic (in-tube SPME/LC-UV) method for determination of lidocaine and its metabolite monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) in human plasma has been developed, validated, and further applied to pharmacokinetic study in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) subjected to epidural anesthesia."( Automated analysis of lidocaine and its metabolite in plasma by in-tube solid-phase microextraction coupled with LC-UV for pharmacokinetic study.
Caris, JA; Lanchote, VL; Moisés, EC; Queiroz, ME; Silva, BJ, 2012
)
0.89
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained by non-compartmental methods and ratio of AUC of MEGX divided by AUC of lidocaine was determined for each dog."( Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine and its metabolite as a hepatic function marker in dogs.
Carrasco-Portugal, MC; Flores-Murrieta, FJ; González-Zamora, JF; Jiménez-Bravo, MA; Pérez-Guillé, BE; Soriano-Rosales, RE; Toledo-López, A; Villegas-Alvarez, F, 2011
)
0.9
" Plasma sample analysis was carried out by employing liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) method, and the pharmacokinetic analysis of the mouse plasma samples was estimated by standard non-compartmental methods."( A pharmacokinetic study of a topical anesthetic (EMLA® ) in mouse soft tissue laceration.
Al-Musawi, A; Andersson, L; Kombian, SB; Matar, K, 2012
)
0.38
" The potential exists for the use of multiple heated patches for longer application times, but the pharmacokinetic properties and tolerability of these multiple and/or longer applications have not been assessed."( Effects of application durations and heat on the pharmacokinetic properties of drug delivered by a lidocaine/tetracaine patch: a randomized, open-label, controlled study in healthy volunteers.
Charney, MR; Marriott, TB; Stanworth, S, 2012
)
0.6
"The aim of this study was to assess the effects of heat and application time on the pharmacokinetic properties and tolerability of the patch after the application of 4 lidocaine/tetracaine (70/70 mg) heated patches applied at the same time in healthy volunteers for up to 12 hours."( Effects of application durations and heat on the pharmacokinetic properties of drug delivered by a lidocaine/tetracaine patch: a randomized, open-label, controlled study in healthy volunteers.
Charney, MR; Marriott, TB; Stanworth, S, 2012
)
0.79
" Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes depend on the nature and degree of hepatic impairment and on the characteristics of the dosed drug."( [Effect of liver cirrhosis on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs].
Perlík, F, 2013
)
0.39
" The purpose of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic profile and the safety, in terms of cardiovascular and CNS toxicity, of lidocaine after intra-articular administration to anesthetized dogs undergoing arthroscopy."( Intra-articular administration of lidocaine in anaesthetized dogs: pharmacokinetic profile and safety on cardiovascular and nervous systems.
Bufalari, A; Cagnardi, P; Catanzaro, A; De Monte, V; Della Rocca, G; Di Salvo, A; Marenzoni, ML; Vigorito, V, 2015
)
0.9
"The phase-I study (single-arm) was designed for pharmacokinetic assessment; the phase-II study (randomized) was intended for investigation of efficacy and safety."( Novel topical formulation of lidocaine provides significant pain relief for intrauterine device insertion: pharmacokinetic evaluation and randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Conner, P; Ekman-Ordeberg, G; Liliecreutz, C; Tingåker, BK; Tornblom-Paulander, S; Werner, A; Wessel, H, 2015
)
0.71
"From the phase-I study (15 participants), mean pharmacokinetic values were: maximum plasma concentration: 351 ± 205 ng/mL; time taken to reach maximum concentration: 68 ± 41 minutes; and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 180 minutes: 717 ± 421 ng*h/mL."( Novel topical formulation of lidocaine provides significant pain relief for intrauterine device insertion: pharmacokinetic evaluation and randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Conner, P; Ekman-Ordeberg, G; Liliecreutz, C; Tingåker, BK; Tornblom-Paulander, S; Werner, A; Wessel, H, 2015
)
0.71
" Nanorap pharmacodynamic (PD) and its physical proprieties were also evaluated."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of a nanotechnological topical formulation of lidocaine/prilocaine (nanorap) in healthy volunteers.
Arruda, AM; Castelli, MR; Chen, LS; Costa, SF; De Nucci, G; de Oliveira, MA; de Souza, W; Gagliano-Jucá, T; Lopes, AG; Mendes, GD, 2015
)
0.64
" Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters such as AUC last and C max were predicted with the established in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) models."( Lidocaine Transdermal Patch: Pharmacokinetic Modeling and In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation (IVIVC).
Kondamudi, PK; Malayandi, R; Mutalik, S; Pillai, R; Tirumalasetty, PP, 2016
)
1.88
" In this study, we compared the pharmacokinetic profile of lidocaine administered into the trachea using an atomized or a nonatomized technique."( The Pharmacokinetics of Atomized Lidocaine Administered via the Trachea: A Randomized Trial.
Kazama, T; Masui, K; Oda, Y; Takaenoki, Y, 2016
)
0.96
" We developed a pharmacokinetic model to examine whether bioavailability or absorption rate was different between atomized versus nonatomized lidocaine administration."( The Pharmacokinetics of Atomized Lidocaine Administered via the Trachea: A Randomized Trial.
Kazama, T; Masui, K; Oda, Y; Takaenoki, Y, 2016
)
0.92
" Our pharmacokinetic model estimated a difference of bioavailability between the atomized and the nonatomized lidocaine (0."( The Pharmacokinetics of Atomized Lidocaine Administered via the Trachea: A Randomized Trial.
Kazama, T; Masui, K; Oda, Y; Takaenoki, Y, 2016
)
0.93
"Adrenaline is known to prolong the duration of local anesthesia but its effects on the pharmacokinetic processes of local anesthetic drugs are not fully understood."( Pharmacokinetics of Lidocaine Hydrochloride Administered with or without Adrenaline for the Paravertebral Brachial Plexus Block in Dogs.
Choquette, A; Del Castillo, JR; Guillot, M; Troncy, E; Varin, F, 2017
)
0.78
" As no previous investigations have been conducted to evaluate the population pharmacokinetics of long-term exposure to lidocaine 5% medicated plasters, further insights into the evaluation of the pharmacokinetic properties of lidocaine and its metabolites were needed for the assessment of its safety."( Evaluation of the Population Pharmacokinetic Properties of Lidocaine and its Metabolites After Long-Term Multiple Applications of a Lidocaine Plaster in Post-Herpetic Neuralgia Patients.
Boesl, I; Bursi, R; Grevel, J; Huntjens, D; Piana, C, 2017
)
0.91
"The population pharmacokinetic properties of lidocaine and its metabolites were evaluated after multiple applications of lidocaine 5% medicated plasters based on data collected for up to 14."( Evaluation of the Population Pharmacokinetic Properties of Lidocaine and its Metabolites After Long-Term Multiple Applications of a Lidocaine Plaster in Post-Herpetic Neuralgia Patients.
Boesl, I; Bursi, R; Grevel, J; Huntjens, D; Piana, C, 2017
)
0.96
"The model provides reliable estimates of the pharmacokinetic behavior of lidocaine after medicated plaster application."( Evaluation of the Population Pharmacokinetic Properties of Lidocaine and its Metabolites After Long-Term Multiple Applications of a Lidocaine Plaster in Post-Herpetic Neuralgia Patients.
Boesl, I; Bursi, R; Grevel, J; Huntjens, D; Piana, C, 2017
)
0.93
" To investigate the pharmacokinetic hypothesis, we determined concentrations of radiolabeled (C) lidocaine up to 90 min after administration."( Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Lidocaine in a Rodent Model of Diabetic Neuropathy.
de Bruin, K; Hollmann, MW; Horn, J; Lirk, P; Picardi, S; Rigaud, M; Tan, HL; Ten Hoope, W; Verberne, HJ; Verhamme, C; Verkerk, AO, 2018
)
0.96
" In this rodent model of neuropathy, both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic mechanisms contribute to prolonged nerve block duration."( Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Lidocaine in a Rodent Model of Diabetic Neuropathy.
de Bruin, K; Hollmann, MW; Horn, J; Lirk, P; Picardi, S; Rigaud, M; Tan, HL; Ten Hoope, W; Verberne, HJ; Verhamme, C; Verkerk, AO, 2018
)
0.75
" Pharmacokinetic measures were calculated using noncompartmental analysis."( Effect of Coadministration of Lidocaine on the Pain and Pharmacokinetics of Intramuscular Amikacin in Children With Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
Draper, HR; Garcia-Prats, AJ; Hesseling, AC; McIlleron, HM; Norman, J; Rose, PC; Schaaf, HS; Seddon, JA, 2018
)
0.77
" A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) analysis was performed using the nonlinear mixed effects model (NONMEM)."( Population pharmacokinetic model for tumescent lidocaine in women undergoing breast cancer surgery.
Allanioux, L; Blin, O; Bourgoin, A; Guilhaumou, R; Leone, M; Marsot, A; Riff, C, 2018
)
0.74
" The objective of this study was to evaluate the previously developed pharmacokinetic models and dosing regimen."( Lidocaine as treatment for neonatal seizures: Evaluation of previously developed population pharmacokinetic models and dosing regimen.
de Haan, TR; Egberts, TCG; Favié, LMA; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, ADR; Nuytemans, DHGM; Rademaker, CMA; Rijken, M; Simons, SHP; van den Broek, MPH; van Straaten, HLM, 2020
)
2
" Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed using non-linear mixed effects modelling."( Lidocaine as treatment for neonatal seizures: Evaluation of previously developed population pharmacokinetic models and dosing regimen.
de Haan, TR; Egberts, TCG; Favié, LMA; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, ADR; Nuytemans, DHGM; Rademaker, CMA; Rijken, M; Simons, SHP; van den Broek, MPH; van Straaten, HLM, 2020
)
2
" Noncompartmental analysis was used to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters for the MLK group."( Pharmacokinetics of an intravenous constant rate infusion of a morphine-lidocaine-ketamine combination in Holstein calves undergoing umbilical herniorrhaphy.
Coetzee, JF; Hartnack, AK; Kleinhenz, MD; Lakritz, J; Niehaus, AJ, 2020
)
0.79
"During the CRI of the MLK solution, steady-state serum concentrations were achieved for lidocaine and ketamine, but not morphine, likely owing to the fairly long half-life of morphine."( Pharmacokinetics of an intravenous constant rate infusion of a morphine-lidocaine-ketamine combination in Holstein calves undergoing umbilical herniorrhaphy.
Coetzee, JF; Hartnack, AK; Kleinhenz, MD; Lakritz, J; Niehaus, AJ, 2020
)
1.01
"4% lidocaine were applied to healthy volunteers' backs (n = 15) for 12 h in a single-center, open-label, four-treatment, four-period crossover pharmacokinetic study."( Biorelevant In Vitro Skin Permeation Testing and In Vivo Pharmacokinetic Characterization of Lidocaine from a Nonaqueous Drug-in-Matrix Topical System.
Greuber, E; Koplowitz, B; Koplowitz, LP; Lissin, D; Maibach, HI; Patel, K; Shiramizu, A; Suzuki, H; Usuda, K; Vought, K, 2021
)
1.46
" In addition, the disadvantage of applying the well-stirred model in drug-drug interaction (DDI) prediction and a theoretical dilemma in the commonly used whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were discussed."( A myth of the well-stirred model: Is the well-stirred model good for high clearance drugs?
Dong, J; Park, MS, 2022
)
0.72
" Method development and validation were driven for application in pharmacokinetic studies."( Chemometric optimization of salting-out assisted liquid-liquid extraction (SALLE) combined with LC-MS/MS for the analysis of carvedilol enantiomers in human plasma: Application to clinical pharmacokinetics.
de Gaitani, C; de Moraes, N; Dos Santos, J; Kemp, R; Moreira da Silva, R; Pavan, M; Salgado Junior, W; Sankarankutty, A; Yamamoto, P, 2022
)
0.72
" The hypothesis was that the elimination clearance of lidocaine and its metabolites, monoethylglycinexylidide and glycinexylidide, is reduced after a partial hepatectomy, as reflected by observed plasma concentrations that are higher and have a longer half-life than expected based on pharmacokinetic modeling (estimated for normal liver function)."( Lidocaine Intraoperative Infusion Pharmacokinetics during Partial Hepatectomy for Living Liver Donation.
Christians, U; Crouch, CE; Fernandez-Bustamante, A; Hendrickse, A; Henthorn, TK; Kaizer, AM; Schniedewind, B; Wilkey, BJ, 2023
)
2.6
" Pharmacokinetic modeling revealed that the only significant covariate in the model was the fraction of liver remaining after isolation of the donor graft."( Lidocaine Intraoperative Infusion Pharmacokinetics during Partial Hepatectomy for Living Liver Donation.
Christians, U; Crouch, CE; Fernandez-Bustamante, A; Hendrickse, A; Henthorn, TK; Kaizer, AM; Schniedewind, B; Wilkey, BJ, 2023
)
2.35
" This approach allowed us to simulate the cellular environment for a longer time and to compare our model with pharmacokinetic properties (time to onset and duration of action) of local anesthetics from the literature."( Micro-pharmacokinetics of lidocaine and bupivacaine transfer across a myelinated nerve fiber.
Kavčič, H; Mavri, J; Pregeljc, D; Smrkolj, V; Umek, N, 2023
)
1.21
" Lidocaine and metabolite concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography- mass spectrometry and pharmacokinetic (non-compartmental and compartmental) analysis was performed."( Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of lidocaine HCl 2% with epinephrine in horses following a palmar digital nerve block.
Arthur, RM; Blea, J; Katzman, S; Knych, HK; McKemie, DS, 2023
)
2.1
"Compared to previous reports, the terminal half-life and subsequent detection time observed following administration of lidocaine in combination with epinephrine is prolonged."( Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of lidocaine HCl 2% with epinephrine in horses following a palmar digital nerve block.
Arthur, RM; Blea, J; Katzman, S; Knych, HK; McKemie, DS, 2023
)
1.4

Compound-Compound Interactions

High-dose topiramate combined with high-dose lidocaine infusion or high- dose phenobarbital in the acute stage might be an effective treatment option for children with AERRPS. Seizures in three patients were stopped after high- overdose lidocane infusion (6-8 mg/kg/h) in the acutely stage.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"In the present study we investigated the antiinflammatory effect of pentosanpolysulfate (SP 54) in combination with metamizol using different forms of rat paw edema (induced by dextrane, hyaluronidase, trypsin, formaldehyde, carragenine or kaolin)."( [Pharmacological studies on the antiphlogistic effect of pentosanpolysulfate in combination with metamizol].
Kalbhen, DA; Smalla, HD, 1977
)
0.26
"Two well-documented cases of bilateral retinal artery and choriocapillaris occlusions with blindness following head and neck soft-tissue injection with methylprednisolone acetate in combination with lidocaine, epinephrine, or penicillin are reported."( Bilateral retinal artery and choriocapillaris occlusion following the injection of long-acting corticosteroid suspensions in combination with other drugs: I. Clinical studies.
Havener, WH; McGrew, RN; Wilson, RS, 1978
)
0.45
"An experimental dog model was used to reproduce the clinical picture of bilateral arteriole and choriocapillaris occlusion from a unilateral intracarotid injection of long-acting corticosteroids combined with other drugs including lidocaine, epinephrine, and penicillin."( Bilateral retinal artery and choriocapillaris occlusion following the injection of long-acting corticosteroid suspensions in combination with other drugs: II. Animal experimental studies.
McGrew, RN; White, HJ; Wilson, RS, 1978
)
0.44
"Tetrodotoxin (TTX), alone and in combination with various vasoconstrictors and local anesthetics, was evaluated for its ability to produce peripheral nerve blocks in the rat and central neural blocks in the cat and dog."( The local anesthetic activity of tetrodotoxin alone and in combination with vasoconstrictors and local anesthetics.
Adams, HJ; Blair, MR; Takman, BH,
)
0.13
"Lignocaine was tested either alone or in combination with a low dose of morphine by intrathecal administration on the C- and A-beta evoked responses of nociceptive neurones in the dorsal horn of the halothane-anaesthetized rat."( Spinal local anaesthetic actions on afferent evoked responses and wind-up of nociceptive neurones in the rat spinal cord: combination with morphine produces marked potentiation of antinociception.
Chapman, V; Dickenson, AH; Fraser, HM, 1992
)
0.28
"Spinal anesthesia with 2% solution of lidocaine++ in combination with 1-1."( [Evaluation of the effectiveness of spinal anesthesia using lidocaine combined with morphine].
Gel'tser, BI; Mazaev, VP; Semenikhin, AA; Shumatov, VB, 1990
)
0.79
"9% NaCl solution; vehicle) was given, alone and in combination with lidocaine (L), to groups of six pentobarbital (32."( Effects of metoprolol, alone and in combination with lidocaine, on ventricular fibrillation threshold: comparison with atenolol, propranolol, and pindolol.
Beil, ME; Cabot, CF; Coram, WM; Olson, RW; Weiss, GB, 1987
)
0.76
" Thus, effects of these drugs and serum levels, where available, should be more closely followed when used in combination with cimetidine."( Cimetidine drug interactions.
Greene, WL; Levinson, MJ; Self, TH, 1983
)
0.27
" These effects, combined with the common use of cimetidine in clinical practice, make the risk of adverse drug interactions a relatively frequent risk in the clinical setting."( Drug interactions involving cimetidine--mechanisms, documentation, implications.
Greene, W, 1984
)
0.27
"The effect of local anesthetics alone and combined with hyperthermia on the cytotoxic effect of the bleomycin derivative, peplomycin, was studied in FM3A and HeLa cells."( Selective enhancement of the cytotoxicity of the bleomycin derivative, peplomycin, by local anesthetics alone and combined with hyperthermia.
Ishida, A; Mizuno, S, 1982
)
0.26
" We examined the efficacy and electrophysiology of 110 antiarrhythmic drug combination trials at electrophysiologic study in 74 patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia."( Antiarrhythmic drug combinations in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia.
Echt, DS; Griffin, JC; Keefe, DL; Mason, JW; Ross, DL; Swerdlow, CD; Sze, DY; Winkle, RA, 1982
)
0.26
" Brief information on the following reports of drug-drug interactions is given in this article with the intention of giving these reports wider publicity and, possibly, encouraging further observation and research to establish or disprove their validity in a larger and wider range of patients or volunteer subjects."( Early reports on drug interactions.
D'Arcy, PF, 1983
)
0.27
"The efficacy of spinal anesthesia with lidocaine (1 mg/kg) combined with moradol (0."( [Spinal anesthesia with lidocaine combined with moradol].
Kheĭfets, VKh; Maksimov, AV,
)
0.71
"8 mg/min at a constant rate infusion following a 100 mg bolus) combined with magnesium sulfate (M) (2."( Low dose lidocaine combined with magnesium sulfate in warning ventricular arrhythmias.
Battaglia, A; Bertanelli, F; Bertoncini, G; Biondo, L; Fabiano, P; Leone, A; Mori, L, 1993
)
0.7
"The authors compare the efficacies of trimecaine (8 mg/kg), lidocaine (8 mg/kg), azacaine (2 and 3 mg/kg) alone and in combination with morphine (1."( [A comparative evaluation of the effects of local anesthetics combined with morphine and administered epidurally].
Cherniakova, IV; Kiselevich, VE; Korinenko, AN; Osipov, SA,
)
0.37
"5%) combined with epidural lidocaine (2%)."( Low dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with epidural lidocaine for cesarean section--a balance block technique.
Cheng, YJ; Fan, SZ; Liu, CC; Susetio, L; Wang, YP, 1994
)
0.82
" Thus the objective of this investigation was to evaluate the antifibrillatory properties of moricizine (a new antiarrhythmic agent) alone and in combination with lidocaine (an established antifibrillatory agent)."( Antifibrillatory and electrophysiologic actions of moricizine alone and in combination with lidocaine: a prospective, randomized trial.
Chow, MS; Fan, C; Kluger, J; O'Rangers, EA; Ujhelyi, MR, 1993
)
0.7
"5 mg/kg/hr infusion, or saline bolus and infusion), and drug combined with lidocaine (5 mg/kg loading dose, 4 mg/kg/hr infusion)."( Antifibrillatory and electrophysiologic actions of moricizine alone and in combination with lidocaine: a prospective, randomized trial.
Chow, MS; Fan, C; Kluger, J; O'Rangers, EA; Ujhelyi, MR, 1993
)
0.74
"4 mA at baseline during saline infusion, and when saline was combined with lidocaine, respectively."( Antifibrillatory and electrophysiologic actions of moricizine alone and in combination with lidocaine: a prospective, randomized trial.
Chow, MS; Fan, C; Kluger, J; O'Rangers, EA; Ujhelyi, MR, 1993
)
0.74
" Dogs euthanatized with pentobarbital alone had significantly longer times than did dogs euthanatized with pentobarbital in combination with any of the lidocaine concentrations."( Comparison of pentobarbital alone and pentobarbital in combination with lidocaine for euthanasia of dogs.
Broadstone, R; Evans, AT; Hooks, TM; Johnston, SM; McNeil, JR; Stapleton, J, 1993
)
0.72
" We conclude that skillful venipuncture in combination with LT is essential to reduce the venipuncture pain."( [Skillfulness is essential to improve venipuncture pain in combination with lidocaine containing adhesive tape].
Nakao, M; Onji, I, 1996
)
0.52
"The primary objective of this study was to determine the effect of esmolol, administered alone and in combination with lidocaine, on ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) in pigs."( Antifibrillatory effect of esmolol alone and in combination with lidocaine.
Chow, MS; Colucci, RD; Fan, CD; Kluger, J; Sun, H; Tisdale, JE; Zhao, H, 1996
)
0.74
"In a randomized double-blind study, the use of continuous epidural lidocaine during surgery combined with preoperative epidural morphine was compared with that of preoperative epidural morphine alone for postoperative analgesia in 20 patients undergoing hepatectomy."( [Intraoperative continuous epidural lidocaine combined with preoperative administration of epidural morphine for post-hepatectomy pain relief].
Asada, A; Fujii, T; Terai, T; Yabe, M; Yukioka, H, 1997
)
0.81
"The utility of primary human hepatocytes in the evaluation of drug-drug interactions is being investigated in our laboratories."( Applications of primary human hepatocytes in the evaluation of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions: evaluation of model drugs terfenadine and rifampin.
Jurima-Romet, M; Li, AP, 1997
)
0.3
" The neurotoxic effect of midazolam, alone or combined with fentanyl, injected intrathecally repeatedly on 15 occasions over a period of 1 month, was studied in the same model."( An investigation of the possible neurotoxic effects of intrathecal midazolam combined with fentanyl in the rat.
Bahar, M; Chanimov, M; Cohen, ML; Grinshpoon, Y; Herbert, M; Kopolovic, U; Nass, D, 1998
)
0.3
"Epidural analgesia with lidocaine (trimecaine) in combination with the minimum morphine doses is an effective method for regional pain relief in children."( [Postoperative epidural analgesia using local anesthetics in combination with morphine in children].
Agzamkhodzhiaev, TS; Satvaldieva, IA,
)
0.44
" Its combination with the "3 in 1" block was tested for postoperative analgesia following major surgery of the knee."( [Sciatic nerve block: an new lateral mediofemoral approach. The value of its combination with a "3 in 1" block for invasive surgery of the knee].
Blanche, E; Bodin, J; Gouin, F; Hauet, P; Naux, E; Petitfaux, F; Pham-Dang, C; Pinaud, M, 2000
)
0.31
"After testing in four unembalmed corpses the new approach was applied to 42 ASA 1-2 patients, in combination with a continuous "3 in 1" block."( [Sciatic nerve block: an new lateral mediofemoral approach. The value of its combination with a "3 in 1" block for invasive surgery of the knee].
Blanche, E; Bodin, J; Gouin, F; Hauet, P; Naux, E; Petitfaux, F; Pham-Dang, C; Pinaud, M, 2000
)
0.31
" Its combination with the "3 in 1" block was evaluated with a visual analogue scale (VAS) scoring, for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty."( [Sciatic nerve block: an new lateral mediofemoral approach. The value of its combination with a "3 in 1" block for invasive surgery of the knee].
Blanche, E; Bodin, J; Gouin, F; Hauet, P; Naux, E; Petitfaux, F; Pham-Dang, C; Pinaud, M, 2000
)
0.31
" Combined with a continuous "3 in 1" block, it provides excellent analgesia during the early postoperative period after major surgery of the knee."( [Sciatic nerve block: an new lateral mediofemoral approach. The value of its combination with a "3 in 1" block for invasive surgery of the knee].
Blanche, E; Bodin, J; Gouin, F; Hauet, P; Naux, E; Petitfaux, F; Pham-Dang, C; Pinaud, M, 2000
)
0.31
" In this study they were evaluated the acute toxicity (lethal dose 50%, convulsion dose 50%) and latency times of loss of righting reflex and convulsion as well as the duration of convulsion) of 2% lidocaine or 3% prilocaine, when administered in combination with adrenaline and felypressin at various concentrations."( Acute toxicity (LD50 and CD50) of lidocaine and prilocaine in combination with adrenaline and felypressin.
Amaral, IM; Chalita, LV; Demetrio, CG; Ranali, J; Volpato, MC,
)
0.6
"High adrenaline concentrations (1 : 80 000) combined with lignocaine local anaesthetic solution offers no advantage with respect to pain alleviation during the immediate postoperative pain period."( A dose-response study of adrenaline combined with lignocaine 2%: effect on acute postoperative pain after oral soft tissue surgery.
Jorkjend, L; Skoglund, LA, 2001
)
0.31
" Local anaesthetic combined with wound cautery virtually abolished the cortisol response until at least 24 h after dehorning."( Effect of local anaesthetic combined with wound cauterisation on the cortisol response to dehorning in calves.
Bruce, RA; Gregory, NG; Mellor, DJ; Stafford, KJ; Sutherland, MA; Ward, RN, 2002
)
0.31
"To evaluate the feasibility, reliability and analgesia effect of topical anesthesia combined with subconjunctival anesthesia in anti-glaucomatous surgery."( The application of topical anesthesia combined with subconjunctival anesthesia for glaucoma surgery.
Fan, M; Huang, S; Lian, J; Qiu, C; Yu, M, 2003
)
0.32
"5% Alcaine eye drops combined with subconjunctival anesthesia with 2% Lidocaine."( The application of topical anesthesia combined with subconjunctival anesthesia for glaucoma surgery.
Fan, M; Huang, S; Lian, J; Qiu, C; Yu, M, 2003
)
0.55
"Topical anesthesia combined with subconjunctival anesthesia is effective, safe and simple anesthesia alternative in routine anti-glaucomatous surgery, especially for the glaucoma patients at the late stage with narrow visual fields and poor visual ability."( The application of topical anesthesia combined with subconjunctival anesthesia for glaucoma surgery.
Fan, M; Huang, S; Lian, J; Qiu, C; Yu, M, 2003
)
0.32
"4 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 3% mepivacaine, administered with the Wand Plus, has the potential to be a painful injection."( Injection pain and postinjection pain of the palatal-anterior superior alveolar injection, administered with the Wand Plus system, comparing 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine to 3% mepivacaine.
Beck, M; Burns, Y; Nusstein, J; Reader, A; Weaver, J, 2004
)
0.91
"The efficiency of bilateral paravertebral blockade combined with general anaesthesia (active) vs."( General anaesthesia combined with bilateral paravertebral blockade (T5-6) vs. general anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Lönnqvist, PA; Naja, MZ; Ziade, MF, 2004
)
0.32
"The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to compare the pain of injection, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of the intraligamentary injection of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system."( Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Beck, M; Berlin, J; Nusstein, J; Reader, A; Weaver, JM, 2004
)
0.73
"The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of the intraligamentary injection of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, administered with computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system, in mandibular posterior teeth."( Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Beck, M; Berlin, J; Nusstein, J; Reader, A; Weaver, J, 2005
)
0.82
"4 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine were randomly administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system, in a double-blind manner on the mesial and distal aspects of a mandibular first molar, at 2 separate appointments to 51 subjects."( Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Beck, M; Berlin, J; Nusstein, J; Reader, A; Weaver, J, 2005
)
1.02
"The purpose of this study was to determine the anesthetic effectiveness of the supplemental intraligamentary injection, administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system, in mandibular posterior teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis when the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block failed."( Anesthetic effectiveness of the supplemental intraligamentary injection, administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system, in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
Beck, M; Claffey, E; Nusstein, J; Reader, A; Weaver, J, 2005
)
0.33
"A simple liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) device combined with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is presented for the simultaneous analysis of local anaesthetics, lidocaine, bupivacaine, and tetracaine, from human urine sample."( Liquid-phase microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography for the determination of local anaesthetics in human urine.
Chen, B; Kang, S; Ma, M; Yao, S; Zhao, Q, 2006
)
0.53
"We evaluated the efficacy of local or systemic parecoxib combined with lidocaine/clonidine IV regional analgesia in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type 1 in a dominant upper limb."( The antinociceptive effect of local or systemic parecoxib combined with lidocaine/clonidine intravenous regional analgesia for complex regional pain syndrome type I in the arm.
Frade, LP; Lauretti, GR; Lima, ICPR; Pereira, NL, 2005
)
0.79
"2 mL of different concentrations of the following drugs was injected sub-fascially: bupivacaine, lidocaine, and ephedrine alone and bupivacaine or lidocaine combined with ephedrine (n=8 per group)."( Efficacy of lidocaine or bupivacaine combined with ephedrine in rat sciatic nerve block.
Gerner, P; Greco, WR; Hung, YC; Kau, YC; Wang, GK; Zizza, AM; Zurakowski, D,
)
0.73
"Ephedrine combined with bupivacaine interacted additively for both motor and sensory blockade, and ephedrine combined with lidocaine interacted antagonistically (sub-additive) for sensory blockade and additively for motor blockade."( Efficacy of lidocaine or bupivacaine combined with ephedrine in rat sciatic nerve block.
Gerner, P; Greco, WR; Hung, YC; Kau, YC; Wang, GK; Zizza, AM; Zurakowski, D,
)
0.72
"To compare and estimate the safety and efficacy of a new viscoelastic substance combined with anaesthetic used in phacoemulsification surgery."( The use of a new viscoelastic substance combined with anaesthetic in cataract surgery by phacoemulsification.
Bournas, P; Condilis, N; Kanellas, D; Lioumi, D; Syndikakis, K; Vaikoussis, E,
)
0.13
"A sensitive method for the quantification of lidocaine and its metabolites, monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) and glycinexylidide (GX), in animal plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography combined with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry is described."( Determination of lidocaine and its two N-desethylated metabolites in dog and horse plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography combined with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry.
Croubels, S; De Backer, P; Gasthuys, F; Maes, A; Sandersen, C; Weiland, L, 2007
)
0.94
"To compare pain control results between periprostatic nerve block alone and combined with topical prilocaine-lidocaine cream as local anesthesia of prostate biopsy."( Topical prilocaine-lidocaine cream combined with peripheral nerve block improves pain control in prostatic biopsy: results from a prospective randomized trial.
Briganti, A; Dehò, F; Di Girolamo, V; Gallina, A; Montorsi, F; Raber, M; Rigatti, P; Roscigno, M; Salonia, A; Scattoni, V, 2008
)
0.89
"Three hundred patients were randomized to receive PNB (group 1), topical anesthesia of the anal ring, anal canal, and anterior rectal wall combined with PNB (group 2) and placebo (group 3)."( Topical prilocaine-lidocaine cream combined with peripheral nerve block improves pain control in prostatic biopsy: results from a prospective randomized trial.
Briganti, A; Dehò, F; Di Girolamo, V; Gallina, A; Montorsi, F; Raber, M; Rigatti, P; Roscigno, M; Salonia, A; Scattoni, V, 2008
)
0.67
" The drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of these drugs for the hOCT/rOct-mediated hepatic/renal uptake process was also assessed."( Effect of cationic drugs on the transporting activity of human and rat OCT/Oct 1-3 in vitro and implications for drug-drug interactions.
Iwatsubo, T; Kamimura, H; Noguchi, K; Umehara, KI; Usui, T, 2008
)
0.35
" Seizures in three patients were stopped after high-dose lidocaine infusion (6-8 mg/kg/h) in the acute stage and three patients were stopped after high dose phenobarbital (serum level 60-80 ug/mL) combined with high-dose oral topiramate (15-20 mg/kg/day)."( Effect of topiramate, in combination with lidocaine, and phenobarbital, in acute encephalitis with refractory repetitive partial seizures.
Hsia, SH; Lin, JJ; Lin, KL; Wang, HS; Wu, CT, 2009
)
0.86
" High-dose topiramate combined with high-dose lidocaine infusion or high-dose phenobarbital in the acute stage might be an effective treatment option for children with AERRPS."( Effect of topiramate, in combination with lidocaine, and phenobarbital, in acute encephalitis with refractory repetitive partial seizures.
Hsia, SH; Lin, JJ; Lin, KL; Wang, HS; Wu, CT, 2009
)
0.88
"In a prospective, randomized, double-arm study, 200 patients were randomized to receive PNB alone (group A, 100) or PNB combined with a previous administration of the topical anaesthetic Antrolin (group B, 100)."( Periprostatic nerve block (PNB) alone vs PNB combined with an anaesthetic-myorelaxant agent cream for prostate biopsy: a prospective, randomized double-arm study.
Cantiello, F; Di Meo, S; Fusco, F; Iannuzzo, M; Imbimbo, C; Imperatore, V; Mirone, V; Scibelli, G, 2009
)
0.35
" To assess drug-drug interactions, co-administration experiments were conducted with ketoconazole and either propranolol or erythromycin."( Exploration of the African green monkey as a preclinical pharmacokinetic model: oral pharmacokinetic parameters and drug-drug interactions.
Bhadresa, S; Coon, DJ; Lawrence, MS; Magiera, D; Struharik, M; Ward, KW, 2009
)
0.35
" The study aim was to investigate the effect of repeated sessions of cutaneous forearm anaesthesia of the injured limb, in combination with sensory re-education on the recovery of the tactile discrimination and perception of touch/pressure in the injured hand after median or ulnar nerve repair."( Improvement of hand sensibility after selective temporary anaesthesia in combination with sensory re-education.
Esfahani, AR; Hassan-Zadeh, R; Kamali, M; Lajevardi, L, 2009
)
0.35
" During a 2-week period, a topical anaesthetic cream (Lidocaine-PTC, n = 6) or placebo (n = 7) was applied repeatedly (twice a week) with occlusive bandage for 1 hour on the flexor aspect of the forearm of the same side of the nerve injury and combined with sensory re-education."( Improvement of hand sensibility after selective temporary anaesthesia in combination with sensory re-education.
Esfahani, AR; Hassan-Zadeh, R; Kamali, M; Lajevardi, L, 2009
)
0.6
"This finding suggests that forearm deafferentation of injured limb in combination with sensory re-education can enhance sensory recovery after nerve repair."( Improvement of hand sensibility after selective temporary anaesthesia in combination with sensory re-education.
Esfahani, AR; Hassan-Zadeh, R; Kamali, M; Lajevardi, L, 2009
)
0.35
"Forty-six adult volunteers randomly received a conventional IAN block or an IAN block administered with a peripheral nerve stimulator at 2 separate appointments."( A prospective, randomized single-blind study of the anesthetic efficacy of the inferior alveolar nerve block administered with a peripheral nerve stimulator.
Beck, M; Drum, M; Nusstein, J; Reader, A; Simon, F, 2010
)
0.36
"We concluded that the IAN block administered with a peripheral nerve stimulator did not increase the success rate of pulpal anesthesia when compared with a conventional IAN block."( A prospective, randomized single-blind study of the anesthetic efficacy of the inferior alveolar nerve block administered with a peripheral nerve stimulator.
Beck, M; Drum, M; Nusstein, J; Reader, A; Simon, F, 2010
)
0.36
"The objective of this study was to determine the effects of a constant rate of infusion of lidocaine and ketamine in combination with either morphine or fentanyl on the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane (MAC(ISO)) during ovariohysterectomy in dogs."( Reduction of the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane in dogs using a constant rate of infusion of lidocaine-ketamine in combination with either morphine or fentanyl.
Aguado, D; Benito, J; Gómez de Segura, IA, 2011
)
0.8
"To evaluate the value of propofol target-controlled infusion combined with dribbled and nebulized lidocaine in tracheal intubation under spontaneous breathing."( [Application of propofol target controlled infusion combined with dribbled and nebulized lidocaine in tracheal intubation under spontaneous respiration].
Huang, YG; Luo, AL; Xu, JQ; Ye, TH, 2010
)
0.8
"Application of propofol target-controlled infusion combined with dribbled and nebulized lidocaine provides a good condition for tracheal intubation under unconsciousness and spontaneous breathing."( [Application of propofol target controlled infusion combined with dribbled and nebulized lidocaine in tracheal intubation under spontaneous respiration].
Huang, YG; Luo, AL; Xu, JQ; Ye, TH, 2010
)
0.8
"The purpose of this study was to determine whether polarized arrest using adenosine/lidocaine cold crystalloid cardioplegia in combination with the hibernation inductor δ-opioid receptor agonist pentazocine would give satisfactory myocardial protection rather than using depolarized supranormal potassium cardioplegia, supranormal potassium cardioplegia with pentazocine, or adenosine/lidocaine cardioplegia."( The myocardial protection of polarizing cardioplegia combined with delta-opioid receptor agonist in swine.
Chen, C; Dong, P; Hou, X; Wu, T; Yang, J, 2011
)
0.59
"46) ng·mL-1 when used in combination with midazolam and topical lidocaine."( The optimal effect site concentration of remifentanil in combination with intravenous midazolam and topical lidocaine for awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery.
Chang, CH; Kim, HS; Kwak, YL; Lee, JW; Shim, YH; Song, JW, 2012
)
0.83
"The use of topical pharyngeal anesthesia in combination with target-controlled infusion with propofol in the performance of diagnostic gastroscopy might be eliminated without adversely affecting patient care or outcomes."( The questionable efficacy of topical pharyngeal anesthesia in combination with propofol sedation in gastroscopy.
Chang, CJ; Lin, CC; Liou, SC; Su, MY; Tsai, HI; Tsai, YF; Yu, HP, 2012
)
0.38
"To evaluate the effect of placement of urethral catheter combined with lidocaine on urethral irritation caused by postoperative indwelling catheters."( [Effect of painless urethral catheterization combined with lidocaine on urethral irritation].
Bian, J; Li, F; Liu, C; Xue, K; Yang, J; Zhong, Q; Zhou, Q, 2012
)
0.86
"A total of 120 male surgical patients requiring postoperative indwelling catheters between June 2011 and January 2012 were divided into two equal groups for placement of painless urethral catheter combined with bladder washing with lidocaine on the first postoperative day, or for routine catheter placement only."( [Effect of painless urethral catheterization combined with lidocaine on urethral irritation].
Bian, J; Li, F; Liu, C; Xue, K; Yang, J; Zhong, Q; Zhou, Q, 2012
)
0.81
"In patients with painless urethral catheter placement combined with bladder washing with lidocaine, 11 developed urethral irritation symptoms, as compared to 24 in the patients with routine catheter placement only, showing a significant difference between the two groups (P<0."( [Effect of painless urethral catheterization combined with lidocaine on urethral irritation].
Bian, J; Li, F; Liu, C; Xue, K; Yang, J; Zhong, Q; Zhou, Q, 2012
)
0.84
"Placement of painless urethral catheter combined with bladder washing with lidocaine can significantly reduce the incidence of urethral irritation due to postoperative indwelling catheters."( [Effect of painless urethral catheterization combined with lidocaine on urethral irritation].
Bian, J; Li, F; Liu, C; Xue, K; Yang, J; Zhong, Q; Zhou, Q, 2012
)
0.85
" We conducted a trial to evaluate the effect of non-pharmacological [smaller-sized endotracheal tube (ETT)] combined with pharmacological intervention [lidocaine intravenous (i."( A smaller endotracheal tube combined with intravenous lidocaine decreases post-operative sore throat - a randomized controlled trial.
Ren, Y; Tan, ZM; Wang, SL; Xu, YJ; Zhu, Y, 2012
)
0.83
"To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of epidural lidocaine in combination with either tramadol or neostigmine for perineal analgesia in horses."( Efficacy of epidural lidocaine combined with tramadol or neostigmine on perineal analgesia in the horse.
DeRossi, R; Maciel, FB; Módolo, TJ; Pagliosa, RC, 2013
)
0.96
"In interscalene block combined with lidocaine, ropivacaine had slower onset of motor block and longer duration of both blocks than bupivacaine."( Comparison of the motor and sensory block by ropivacaine and bupivacaine in combination with lidocaine in interscalene block.
Nishiyama, T, 2012
)
0.87
" One technique is the tension suture technique, which can be combined with lidocain-adrenalin-saline-infiltration."( Tension suture technique combined with lidocain-adrenalin-saline-infiltration decreases complications in abdominoplasty.
Helle, M; Kuokkanen, H; Saariniemi, K; Salmi, A, 2012
)
0.38
" Peroperative bleeding was a mean of 196 ml in abdominoplasty only and 254 ml when combined with additional operation."( Tension suture technique combined with lidocain-adrenalin-saline-infiltration decreases complications in abdominoplasty.
Helle, M; Kuokkanen, H; Saariniemi, K; Salmi, A, 2012
)
0.38
" This study examined the histological and neurofunctional effects of intrathecally administered lidocaine combined with epinephrine in rats."( Epinephrine administered with lidocaine solution does not worsen intrathecal lidocaine neurotoxicity in rats.
Komatsu, T; Kurashige, C; Nara, Y; Okamoto, H; Takenami, T; Yagishita, S; Yago, K,
)
0.64
" Ephedrine in combination with either bupivacaine or lidocaine was then injected into the spinal catheters."( Ephedrine shows synergistic motor blockade when combined with bupivacaine or lidocaine for spinal anesthesia in a rat model.
Danninger, T; Djalali, AG; Fritsch, G; Gerner, P; Perez-Valdivieso, JR; Wang, JC; Zurakowski, D, 2013
)
0.87
"Ephedrine combined with either bupivacaine or lidocaine acted synergistically to block motor function and has the potential to reduce the amount of local anesthetic needed for spinal block."( Ephedrine shows synergistic motor blockade when combined with bupivacaine or lidocaine for spinal anesthesia in a rat model.
Danninger, T; Djalali, AG; Fritsch, G; Gerner, P; Perez-Valdivieso, JR; Wang, JC; Zurakowski, D, 2013
)
0.88
"To compare the cardiopulmonary effects and the quality of anesthesia of the extradural lidocaine in combination with fentanyl or morphine in bitches undergoing ovariohysterectomy."( Extradural anesthesia with lidocaine combined with fentanyl or methadone to ovariohisterectomy in dogs.
Bernardi, CA; Cassu, RN; Diniz, MS; Kanashiro, GP; Nicácio, GM, 2013
)
0.91
"The extradural lidocaine in combination with fentanyl or morphine allowed cardiopulmonary stability, however sufficient sensitive blockade was not provided in 100% of the dogs."( Extradural anesthesia with lidocaine combined with fentanyl or methadone to ovariohisterectomy in dogs.
Bernardi, CA; Cassu, RN; Diniz, MS; Kanashiro, GP; Nicácio, GM, 2013
)
1.04
"TENS in combination with local cobalamin injection has a significant analgesic effect."( Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in combination with cobalamin injection for postherpetic neuralgia: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
Feng, Y; Lv, ZW; Tang, WZ; Xu, G, 2014
)
0.4
"Acupuncture combined with cervical paravertebral block is effective in relieving cervicogenic headache and improving cervical vertebral activity in cervicogenic headache patients, and can strengthen the therapeutic effect of simple paravertebral block."( [Effect of cervical paravertebral block combined with acupuncture intervention on cervicogenic headache].
Chen, P; Fan, RJ; Song, WX; Wu, JX, 2013
)
0.39
"5% proxymetacaine chlorhydrate and 2% lidocaine gel combined with 2% lidocaine by intracameral route."( Assessing patient satisfaction with cataract surgery under topical anesthesia supplemented by intracameral lidocaine combined with sedation.
Andrade, BB; Fernandes, CR; Fernandes, MB; Ribeiro, KG; Souza, RV; Vasconcelos, GC,
)
0.62
"Patients that received topical anesthesia supplemented by intracameral lidocaine combined with sedation for phacoemulsification cataract surgery reported adequate level of satisfaction with the anesthetic choice."( Assessing patient satisfaction with cataract surgery under topical anesthesia supplemented by intracameral lidocaine combined with sedation.
Andrade, BB; Fernandes, CR; Fernandes, MB; Ribeiro, KG; Souza, RV; Vasconcelos, GC,
)
0.58
" Group A (N = 95) was treated with chemonucleolysis only (the injection of oxygen-ozone combined with collagenase into the lumbar disc and the epidural space); group B (N = 97) was treated with chemonucleolysis and PCB."( CT-guided chemonucleolysis combined with psoas compartment block in lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled study.
Du, Y; Huang, YY; Li, B; Li, Y; Meng, J; Xu, XX; Yang, HF; Zhang, Q, 2014
)
0.4
"Computer tomography (CT)-guided chemonucleolysis combined with PCB leads to rapid pain relief, fewer postoperative pain of collagenase injection happen, and should be regarded as a useful treatment for the management of LDH."( CT-guided chemonucleolysis combined with psoas compartment block in lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled study.
Du, Y; Huang, YY; Li, B; Li, Y; Meng, J; Xu, XX; Yang, HF; Zhang, Q, 2014
)
0.4
"The neurotoxicity of lidocaine was significantly increased when combined with ropivacaine."( Intrathecal lidocaine neurotoxicity: combination with bupivacaine and ropivacaine and effect of nerve growth factor.
Chen, W; Ding, X; Guo, Y; Zhao, G, 2014
)
1.1
"Ropivacaine is not safe when intrathecally administered with lidocaine at the concentrations used in this study."( Intrathecal lidocaine neurotoxicity: combination with bupivacaine and ropivacaine and effect of nerve growth factor.
Chen, W; Ding, X; Guo, Y; Zhao, G, 2014
)
1.02
" Thus, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine injected into the oral mucosa in combination with lidocaine on local anesthetic potency in humans."( Effect of dexmedetomidine injected into the oral mucosa in combination with lidocaine on local anesthetic potency in humans: a crossover double-blind study.
Higuchi, H; Ishii-Maruhama, M; Maeda, S; Miyawaki, T; Tomoyasu, Y; Yamane, A, 2015
)
0.85
"Objectives The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of epidural lidocaine in combination with either methadone or morphine for postoperative analgesia in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy."( Postoperative pain control in cats: clinical trials with pre-emptive lidocaine epidural co-administered with morphine or methadone.
de Andrade Bicudo, N; de Assis, KT; DeRossi, R; Hermeto, LC; Jardim, PHA, 2016
)
0.9
" Therefore, we aim to explore new anaesthetic protocols to be used in zebrafish by studying the quality of anaesthesia and recovery induced by different concentrations of propofol alone and in combination with different concentrations of lidocaine."( A New Anaesthetic Protocol for Adult Zebrafish (Danio rerio): Propofol Combined with Lidocaine.
Antunes, LM; Carvalho, L; Diniz, E; Félix, LM; Valentim, AM, 2016
)
0.84
"5 μg/ml of propofol combined with 50, (P/50L), 100 (P/100L) or 150 μg/ml (P/150L) of lidocaine."( A New Anaesthetic Protocol for Adult Zebrafish (Danio rerio): Propofol Combined with Lidocaine.
Antunes, LM; Carvalho, L; Diniz, E; Félix, LM; Valentim, AM, 2016
)
0.88
"To determine the efficacy of methylcobalamin combined with lidocaine for acute herpetic neuralgia."( Local Injection of Methylcobalamin Combined with Lidocaine for Acute Herpetic Neuralgia.
Cheng, C; Tang, WZ; Xǔ, G; Xu, J; Xu, S, 2016
)
0.93
"Control groups received intramuscular methylcobalamin in addition to local lidocaine injection, while treatment groups received local methylcobalamin combined with lidocaine injection for 14 days."( Local Injection of Methylcobalamin Combined with Lidocaine for Acute Herpetic Neuralgia.
Cheng, C; Tang, WZ; Xǔ, G; Xu, J; Xu, S, 2016
)
0.92
"Local methylcobalamin combined with lidocaine, optimally administered within 4-7 days of onset, may be an effective therapeutic option for acute herpetic neuralgia."( Local Injection of Methylcobalamin Combined with Lidocaine for Acute Herpetic Neuralgia.
Cheng, C; Tang, WZ; Xǔ, G; Xu, J; Xu, S, 2016
)
0.96
"Use of SB combined with general anesthesia in patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery reduces postoperative analgesic requirements and complications such as intraoperative OCR and PONV."( Subtenon block combined with general anesthesia for vitreoretinal surgery improves postoperative analgesia in adult: a randomized controlled trial.
Abdelhalim, AA; Abouammoh, MA; Al-Zahrani, TA; Elzoughari, I; Mohamed, EA; Mustafa, M, 2016
)
0.43
"To compare the effects of a lidocaine constant rate infusion (CRI) combined with 1% isoflurane versus those of 2% isoflurane alone on cardiovascular variables in anaesthetized horses, and to estimate the sample size required to detect a difference in recovery quality."( Comparison of the effects of an intravenous lidocaine infusion combined with 1% isoflurane versus 2% isoflurane alone on selected cardiovascular variables and recovery characteristics during equine general anaesthesia.
Cruz Benedetti, IC; Fourel, I; Le Bris, M; Mongellas, E; Nottrott, K; Portier, K, 2017
)
1.01
"A lidocaine CRI combined with FIIso 1% rather than FIIso 2% alone may improve cardiovascular variables in healthy anaesthetized horses."( Comparison of the effects of an intravenous lidocaine infusion combined with 1% isoflurane versus 2% isoflurane alone on selected cardiovascular variables and recovery characteristics during equine general anaesthesia.
Cruz Benedetti, IC; Fourel, I; Le Bris, M; Mongellas, E; Nottrott, K; Portier, K, 2017
)
1.44
" The aim of the study was to determine the effects of constant-rate infusion of lidocaine and ketamine combined with either morphine or fentanyl on the MAC of sevoflurane in pigs."( Effect of Lidocaine-Ketamine Infusions Combined with Morphine or Fentanyl in Sevoflurane-Anesthetized Pigs.
Canfrán, S; Gómez de Segura, IA; Largo, C; Re, M, 2016
)
1.06
" Iontophoresis in combination with DC and AC was found to enable highly efficient drug delivery that shares the benefits of both forms of current application."( Drug delivery and transmission of lidocaine using iontophoresis in combination with direct and alternating currents.
Fukayama, H; Ikoma, T; Inoue, T; Shimazu, H; Sugiyama, T; Wakita, R, 2016
)
0.68
"The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the interactions of the local anesthetic lidocaine combined with an agent (serotonin or dopamine) as infiltrative anesthetics."( Synergistic Effects of Serotonin or Dopamine Combined With Lidocaine at Producing Nociceptive Block in Rats.
Chen, YW; Chiu, CC; Hung, CH; Liu, KS; Wang, JJ,
)
0.6
" Drug-drug interactions were calculated using the isobolographic analysis."( Synergistic Effects of Serotonin or Dopamine Combined With Lidocaine at Producing Nociceptive Block in Rats.
Chen, YW; Chiu, CC; Hung, CH; Liu, KS; Wang, JJ,
)
0.37
"The quaternary lidocaine derivative (QX-314) in combination with bupivacaine can produce long-lasting nerve blocks in vivo, indicating potential clinical application."( The quaternary lidocaine derivative QX-314 in combination with bupivacaine for long-lasting nerve block: Efficacy, toxicity, and the optimal formulation in rats.
Li, J; Liu, J; Lv, R; Ma, L; Yang, X; Yin, Q; Zhang, W; Zheng, Q; Zhu, T, 2017
)
1.16
" This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of three intrarectal local anesthesia (IRLA) combined with PPNB in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy."( Prospective comparison among three intrarectal anesthetic treatments combined with periprostatic nerve block during transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy.
Campos-Salcedo, JG; Canizalez-Román, A; Parés-Hipólito, J; Sedano-Lozano, A; Shelton, LM; Torres-Gomez, JJ; Valdez-Flores, MA; Valdez-Flores, RA, 2018
)
0.48
"Intrarectal application of EMLA cream is a more efficient pain reduction than either 2% lidocaine gel or 100 mg indomethacin suppository when applied combined with PPNB."( Prospective comparison among three intrarectal anesthetic treatments combined with periprostatic nerve block during transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy.
Campos-Salcedo, JG; Canizalez-Román, A; Parés-Hipólito, J; Sedano-Lozano, A; Shelton, LM; Torres-Gomez, JJ; Valdez-Flores, MA; Valdez-Flores, RA, 2018
)
0.7
"To assess the effect of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) combined with epidural injection for prolapsed lumbar disc herniation(PLDH)."( [Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with epidural injection for prolapsed lumbar disc herniation].
Pang, QJ; Tang, T; Wang, Y; Wu, HH; Zhang, ZK, 2017
)
0.46
" And combination with epidural injection has the advantages of pain releasing and function improving in the short-term postoperative period, and it can decrease postoperative hospital stay and time of returning to work, and it is a safe and effective method."( [Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with epidural injection for prolapsed lumbar disc herniation].
Pang, QJ; Tang, T; Wang, Y; Wu, HH; Zhang, ZK, 2017
)
0.46
"Ultrasound-guided GNB, when combined with a local anesthetic and corticosteroid, can provide short-term pain relief."( Ultrasound-Guided Genicular Nerve Block for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial of Local Anesthetic Alone or in Combination with Corticosteroid.
Choi, SS; Choi, WJ; Kim, DH; Lee, IG; Lee, SH; Seo, DK; Shin, JW; Yoon, SH, 2018
)
0.48
"To observe and analyze the clinical effect of cervical paravertebral nerve block combined with Mailuoning and Angelica sinensis injection in treatment of nerve-root type cervical spondylosis."( Clinical effect of cervical paravertebral nerve block combined with Mailuoning and Angelica sinensis in treatment of nerve-root type cervical spondylosis.
Han, J; Li, Y; Liu, X; Yu, H; Zhang, J, 2018
)
0.48
"This study was designed to assess the preclinical toxicity of antipyrine combined with lidocaine hydrochloride ear drops (ALED) and support the clinical trials of ALED in clinical settings in China."( Preclinical safety assessment of antipyrine combined with lidocaine hydrochloride as ear drops.
Ba, JB; Chu, ZY; Feng, X; Liu, WH; Zhang, XD; Zou, YX, 2019
)
0.98
"Ketamine combined with lidocaine may be beneficial in shortening the onset of anesthesia, promoting postoperative awake, prolonging elimination half-life, increasing area under curve, and decreasing plasma clearance rate and incidence of adverse reactions."( Effect of ketamine combined with lidocaine in pediatric anesthesia.
Fang, H; Li, HF; Liao, R; Wang, QY; Wang, RR; Yang, M; Zhang, FX; Zhang, JP; Zheng, PC, 2020
)
1.15
"To investigate the effect of lidocaine epinephrine iontophoresis combined with exercises on gait and spasticity in children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy (HCP)."( Effect of lidocaine iontophoresis combined with exercise intervention on gait and spasticity in children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial.
Aboelnasr, EA; Hegazy, FA; Salem, YT, 2020
)
1.25
"Lidocaine iontophoresis combined with exercises was effective in improving gait spatiotemporal parameters and reducing spasticity in children with CP."( Effect of lidocaine iontophoresis combined with exercise intervention on gait and spasticity in children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial.
Aboelnasr, EA; Hegazy, FA; Salem, YT, 2020
)
2.4
" Nonetheless, only few studies have evaluated the clinical therapeutic effects of lidocaine combination with flurbiprofen axetil to prevent pain on injection of propofol."( Clinical therapeutic effects of lidocaine combination with flurbiprofen axetil for reducing propofol-induced pain in adults: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fu, J; Lu, G; Sun, W; Ye, X; Yu, J, 2020
)
1.07
"This study will provide high-quality evidence for the clinical therapeutic effects of lidocaine combination with flurbiprofen axetil for reducing pain on injection of propofol in adult patients."( Clinical therapeutic effects of lidocaine combination with flurbiprofen axetil for reducing propofol-induced pain in adults: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fu, J; Lu, G; Sun, W; Ye, X; Yu, J, 2020
)
1.07
"Intravenous lidocaine plays a significant role in the hemodynamic stability of patients under general anesthesia without exerting any additional impact on the NMB, even combined with magnesium sulfate."( Lidocaine combined with magnesium sulfate preserved hemodynamic stability during general anesthesia without prolonging neuromuscular blockade: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.
de Boer, HD; Garcia, LV; Oliveira-Paula, GH; Paula-Garcia, WN, 2021
)
2.44
"This study aims to investigate the effect of compound topical anesthetic (CTA) application combined with photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) on the level of pain perceived during placement of miniscrews and 24 h post the procedure in the buccal side of the maxillary bone."( Efficacy of compound topical anesthesia combined with photobiomodulation therapy in pain control for placement of orthodontic miniscrew: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.
Chiniforush, N; Cronshaw, M; Dadgar, S; Navaei, RA; Noroozian, M; Rakhshan, V; Saravani, HJ; Sobouti, F, 2022
)
0.72
"This study aimed to explore the effect and mechanism of lidocaine pretreatment combined with dexmedetomidine on oxidative stress in patients with intracranial aneurysm clipping."( Effect and Mechanism of Lidocaine Pretreatment Combined with Dexmedetomidine on Oxidative Stress in Patients with Intracranial Aneurysm Clipping.
Liu, Y; Zhang, H; Zhang, J; Zhao, L; Zhao, Z, 2021
)
1.17
"5 mg/kg) combined with lidocaine (2 mg/kg) or lidocaine (2 mg/kg) only (control treatment)."( Neuraxial administration of morphine combined with lidocaine induces regional antinociception in inland bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps).
Ferreira, TH; Fink, DM; Mans, C, 2021
)
1.18
"Under the guidance of a digital subtraction angiography (DSA) machine, via fluoroscopic imaging techniques, patients diagnosed with herpes zoster neuralgia at the subacute stage, where self-reported pain lasts between 30 and 90 days, were treated with nerve pulsed radiofrequency surgery combined with intravenous lidocaine infusion or saline infusion as control."( Clinical Efficacy of Pulsed Radiofrequency Combined with Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in the Treatment of Subacute Herpes Zoster Neuralgia.
He, C; Zhang, W, 2022
)
1.13
"DSA-guided nerve pulse radiofrequency surgery combined with intravenous lidocaine infusion can effectively relieve pain in patients diagnosed with herpes zoster nerves at the subacute stage, reduce the number of analgesic drugs used in patients, reduce postherpetic neuralgia incidence rate, and improve sleep and quality of life."( Clinical Efficacy of Pulsed Radiofrequency Combined with Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in the Treatment of Subacute Herpes Zoster Neuralgia.
He, C; Zhang, W, 2022
)
1.19
"To explore the effect of stellate ganglion block (SGB) combined with lidocaine at different concentrations for preemptive analgesia on postoperative pain relief and adverse reactions of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)."( Effect of Stellate Ganglion Block Combined with Lidocaine at Different Concentrations for Preemptive Analgesia on Postoperative Pain Relief and Adverse Reactions of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Dong, Z; Niu, T; Wang, Z; Yin, Z; Yu, J, 2022
)
1.21
" This work aimed to apply chemometrics for the optimization of a salting-out assisted liquid-liquid extraction (SALLE) combined with LC-MS/MS to analyze carvedilol enantiomers in plasma samples."( Chemometric optimization of salting-out assisted liquid-liquid extraction (SALLE) combined with LC-MS/MS for the analysis of carvedilol enantiomers in human plasma: Application to clinical pharmacokinetics.
de Gaitani, C; de Moraes, N; Dos Santos, J; Kemp, R; Moreira da Silva, R; Pavan, M; Salgado Junior, W; Sankarankutty, A; Yamamoto, P, 2022
)
0.72
"The aim of this study was to compare the effects of constant rate infusions (CRI) of fentanyl alone or combined with lidocaine and ketamine (FLK), on physiological parameters, isoflurane requirements and the number of postoperative analgesic rescues in dogs undergoing unilateral mastectomy."( Influence of Constant Rate Infusions of Fentanyl Alone or in Combination With Lidocaine and Ketamine on the Response to Surgery and Postoperative Pain in Isoflurane Anesthetized Dogs Undergoing Unilateral Mastectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Alievi, MM; de Oliveira, TF; Herrera-Becerra, JR; Marques, ÉJ; Monteiro, ER; Rovaris, IB; Tomazeli, D; Valle, SF,
)
0.57
" We speculated that the application of compound lidocaine/prilocaine combined with tetracaine spray would better prevent coughing caused by tracheal extubation."( Compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream combined with tetracaine prevents cough caused by extubation after general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial.
Gao, J; Li, T; Li, Y; Wang, M; Zhang, E; Zhang, H; Zhang, L; Zhao, X, 2023
)
1.58
"Patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy or cholecystectomy combined with common bile duct exploration under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to Group C (saline spray), Group L (2 g compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream contains 5 mg of lidocaine and 5 mg prilocaine)), Group T (tetracaine) and Group F (compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream combined with tetracaine)."( Compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream combined with tetracaine prevents cough caused by extubation after general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial.
Gao, J; Li, T; Li, Y; Wang, M; Zhang, E; Zhang, H; Zhang, L; Zhao, X, 2023
)
1.51
"Compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream combined with tetracaine may be a more effective approach for preventing coughing and stabilising circulation during extubation following general anaesthesia."( Compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream combined with tetracaine prevents cough caused by extubation after general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial.
Gao, J; Li, T; Li, Y; Wang, M; Zhang, E; Zhang, H; Zhang, L; Zhao, X, 2023
)
1.74
"Our purpose of this study was to investigate the value of ultrasound combined with disposable cervical dilating stick and lidocaine in hysteroscopic intrauterine device (IUD) removal in postmenopausal women."( Ultrasound Combined With Single-Use Cervical Dilation Sticks And Lidocaine Achieved Good Clinical Outcomes In Hysteroscopic Removal Of The Intrauterine Device: A Pilot Study.
Wang, Y; Zhao, Y, 2023
)
1.36
"Ninety-six postmenopausal women who requested IUD removal in our hospital from March 2020 to March 2022 were selected and randomly divided into a control group (48 cases) and a study group (48 cases) according to random number table method, with the control group undergoing conventional hysteroscopic IUD removal and the study group undergoing hysteroscopic IUD removal with ultrasound combined with a single-use cervical dilator rod and lidocaine."( Ultrasound Combined With Single-Use Cervical Dilation Sticks And Lidocaine Achieved Good Clinical Outcomes In Hysteroscopic Removal Of The Intrauterine Device: A Pilot Study.
Wang, Y; Zhao, Y, 2023
)
1.31
"In hysteroscopic IUD removal, ultrasound combined with single-use cervical dilation sticks and lidocaine can gently soften and dilate the cervix in a short time, shortening the procedure time and reducing pain."( Ultrasound Combined With Single-Use Cervical Dilation Sticks And Lidocaine Achieved Good Clinical Outcomes In Hysteroscopic Removal Of The Intrauterine Device: A Pilot Study.
Wang, Y; Zhao, Y, 2023
)
1.37
"The authors sought to quantify the clinical impacts of granisetron, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, and lidocaine combined with fentanyl, for procedural sedation and analgesia in cystoscopy and for bladder catheter tolerance."( Efficacy appraisal of four regimens (granisetron, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, and lidocaine combined with fentanyl) for cystoscopy-associated sedation and analgesia and catheter-related bladder tolerance: a randomized clinical trial.
Almasi-Hashiani, A; Jafarirismani, R; Modir, H; Shamaii, K,
)
0.57
" To avoid difficult airway-related emergency scenarios, the AFNI was successfully performed through intravenous injection of sufentanil and dexmedetomidine combined with lidocaine topical anesthesia under a conscious state without any uncomfortable feeling or complications."( Sufentanil, dexmedetomidine combined with surface anesthesia for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation in the patient with severe mouth opening difficulty undergoing wedge resection of the right upper lung: A case report and literature review.
Lv, X; Sun, P; Yin, D; Zhang, Y, 2023
)
1.1
"Intravenous injection of sufentanil and dexmedetomidine combined with lidocaine topical anesthesia can be used as an alternative medication scheme to relieve uncomfortable suffering for AFNI in patients with severe mouth opening difficulty."( Sufentanil, dexmedetomidine combined with surface anesthesia for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation in the patient with severe mouth opening difficulty undergoing wedge resection of the right upper lung: A case report and literature review.
Lv, X; Sun, P; Yin, D; Zhang, Y, 2023
)
1.14
"To investigate the application value and safety of peripheral prostate nerve block (PPNB) combined with dezocine in transrectal prostate biopsy."( [Application value and safety of prostate peripheral nerve block combined with dezocine in transrectal prostate biopsy].
Cai, QF; Lu, YX, 2022
)
0.72
"Using a random number table, we divided 97 patients undergoing prostate biopsy in our hospital from October 2018 to October 2020 into an experimental group (n = 49) and a control group (n = 48), the former anesthetized by PPNB combined with dezocine and the latter by PPNB only."( [Application value and safety of prostate peripheral nerve block combined with dezocine in transrectal prostate biopsy].
Cai, QF; Lu, YX, 2022
)
0.72
"PPNB combined with dezocine for prostate biopsy is more conducive to maintaining the stability of the patient's hemodynamics, and has a good analgesic effect and a high safety."( [Application value and safety of prostate peripheral nerve block combined with dezocine in transrectal prostate biopsy].
Cai, QF; Lu, YX, 2022
)
0.72
"Lidocaine was shown to reduce cognitive impairment in rats with cognitive dysfunction through anti-inflammatory and antioxidative stress mechanisms in combination with CRMP2 antiphosphorylation."( Effect of lidocaine on cognitively impaired rats: Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant mechanisms in combination with CRMP2 antiphosphorylation.
Huang, L; Lin, X; Lin, Y; Zheng, X, 2023
)
2.76

Bioavailability

The aim of this work was to study the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine (BUP) and lidocaine (LID) administered separately in rabbits using microdialysis with retrodialysis calibration.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" absorption rate is nearly a third of that of lidocaine or tetracaine."( Comparative subcutaneous absorption of local anesthetics: lidocaine, procaine and tetracaine.
Lustig, A; Menczel, E; Paran, I; Yacobi, A, 1977
)
0.76
" Intraindividual variability was rather small, indicating that oral and rectal bioavailability of lidocaine is reproducible in individuals."( Rectal bioavailability of lidocaine in man: partial avoidance of "first-pass" metabolism.
Breimer, DD; de Boer, AG; Gubbens-Stibbe, JM; Mattie, H; Pronk, J, 1979
)
0.78
" Lignocaine bioavailability after oral administration was more than two-fold in the patients than in the normal subjects (0."( Reduction of oral bioavailability of lignocaine by induction of first pass metabolism in epileptic patients.
Perucca, E; Richens, A, 1979
)
0.26
" The differential rate of absorption is probably related to the anatomical arrangement of the venous plexuses in the epidural and subarachnoid spaces."( Absorption of lidocaine following subarachnoid and epidural administration.
Covino, BG; D'Agostino, E; Giasi, RM,
)
0.49
" It is concluded that the addition of adrenaline reduces the fraction of the dose being absorbed during the first (fast) phase rather than influencing the absorption rate constants."( The effects of adding adrenaline to etidocaine and lignocaine in extradural anaesthesia II: Pharmacokinetics.
Bonica, JJ; Mather, LE; Murphy, TM; Tucker, GT, 1976
)
0.26
"The bioavailability of topically applied ocular drugs is very poor, due largely to drug loss through drainage and tear turnover."( Influence of topical anesthesia on tear dynamics and ocular drug bioavailability in albino rabbits.
Patton, TF; Robinson, JR, 1975
)
0.25
"The rate of absorption and plasma concentrations of lidocaine were determined in 15 supine patients under general anesthesia following either endotracheal spray of 200 mg."( Plasma concentration of lidocaine after endotracheal spray.
Brannan, MD; Chu, SS; Cohen, JL; Rah, KH,
)
0.69
" Loo-Riegelman analysis of the absorption rate did not allow unequivocal assignment of an "order" to the absorption process."( Kinetics of the oral antiarrhythmic lidocaine congener, tocainide.
Duce, BR; Elvin, AT; Lalka, D; Meyer, MB, 1976
)
0.53
" The results of the study demonstrated that the addition of dextran to epidural lignocaine significantly slowed systemic absorption of lignocaine as indicated by a smaller absorption rate constant, a reduced peak plasma concentration (Cmax), a delayed time to reach Cmax."( The effect of dextran on the pharmacokinetics of lignocaine during epidural anaesthesia.
Alkhawajah, A; Farag, H, 1992
)
0.28
" The study suggests that the rate of absorption of lignocaine is not altered after epidural administration and that its hepatic metabolism is increased in diabetics compared to non-diabetics."( Altered pharmacokinetics of lignocaine after epidural injection in type II diabetics.
Adithan, C; Peeyush, M; Ravishankar, M; Shashindran, CH, 1992
)
0.28
" The surface tension lowering effect of lidocaine may account for significant decreases in apparent bioavailability and delivered lidocaine when high pH solutions are used with drop counting infusion pumps."( The influence of pH on the intravenous delivery of lidocaine solutions.
Feinstein, M; Hod, H; Kaplinsky, E; Leor, R; Rabinowitz, B, 1990
)
0.8
"9 min, and mean bioavailability was 90%."( [The pharmacokinetics of lidocaine in resuscitation conditions. Results of experimental studies on swine].
Dorer, A; Hörnchen, U; Lauven, PM; Schüttler, J; Stoeckel, H, 1990
)
0.58
" The mean absorption half-life was approximately 7 min and the mean bioavailability was slightly in excess of 100%."( Pharmacokinetics of quinacrine after intrapleural instillation in rabbits and man.
Björkman, S; Elisson, LO; Gabrielsson, J, 1989
)
0.28
"Six healthy males participated in a single-dose two-way crossover study of the bioavailability of intranasal vs intravenous administration of lignocaine (lidocaine) hydrochloride."( The bioavailability of intranasal lignocaine.
Fraser, DG; Greenblatt, DJ; Scavone, JM, 1989
)
0.47
" In conclusion, this rapid and convenient analysis was found to be suitable for the bioavailability pharmacokinetic assessment of lidocaine following low-dose regional drug administration."( Sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic assay using 9-fluorenylmethylchloroformate for monitoring controlled-release lidocaine in plasma.
Levy, RJ; Siden, R; Sintov, A, 1989
)
0.69
" Propranolol bioavailability correlated with the diameter of the portal vein and was dependent on the size of oesophageal varices and the presence of cavernous transformation of the portal vein."( [Usefulness of the evaluation of blood supply and mass of the liver for predicting the rate of pharmacokinetics of lidocaine, propranolol and phenazone].
Becker, A; Bołdys, H; Hartleb, M; Kloc, T; Mańczyk, I, 1989
)
0.49
" Lipid-soluble agents like propranolol and metoprolol are well absorbed orally, and undergo rapid hepatic metabolism, with important presystemic clearance and a short plasma half-life."( The pharmacokinetics of lignocaine and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Gagne, G; Nattel, S; Pineau, M, 1987
)
0.27
" These data indicate that cimetidine, but not ranitidine, causes a decrease in the bioavailability of tocainide and that neither agent alters the apparent elimination rate of tocainide."( The effect of histamine-2 receptor antagonists on tocainide pharmacokinetics.
Kapil, RP; Lalonde, RL; Mattern, AL; North, DS, 1988
)
0.27
"A method was developed to measure bioavailability of lidocaine by simultaneous peroral and intravenous dosing."( Bioavailability determination of lidocaine by capillary gas chromatography ammonia chemical ionization mass spectrometry.
Bircher, J; Karlaganis, G, 1987
)
0.8
" In cirrhosis the bioavailability of a flow-dependent drug increases because of both portosystemic shunting and hepatocyte dysfunction."( Disposition of a flow-limited drug (lidocaine) and a metabolic capacity-limited drug (theophylline) in liver cirrhosis.
Buccino, G; Cocciolo, M; Colli, A; Parravicini, R; Scaltrini, G, 1988
)
0.55
" The drug has nearly 100% bioavailability after oral administration and an effective half-life of 9 to 37 hours (mean, 15 hours)."( Tocainide: a new oral antiarrhythmic agent.
Horowitz, LN; Kutalek, SP; Morganroth, J, 1985
)
0.27
" Oral bioavailability is virtually complete, elimination half-life is 11-15 hours, and 40 percent of a dose is excreted unchanged in urine."( Tocainide: a new oral antiarrhythmic.
Hasegawa, GR,
)
0.13
" 506 +/- 82 ng/ml X hr) and absolute bioavailability (35% +/- 7% vs."( Lack of interaction between verapamil and cimetidine.
Abernethy, DR; Schwartz, JB; Todd, EL, 1985
)
0.27
" Lignocaine oral clearance, elimination half-life and oral bioavailability were unchanged after ranitidine pretreatment."( The effect of ranitidine on the disposition of lignocaine.
Birkett, DJ; Lillywhite, KJ; Miners, JO; Robson, RA; Wing, LM, 1985
)
0.27
" Since the rectal bioavailability is about 65 per cent in man it is assumed that some drug is directly absorbed into systemic circulation by-passing the liver."( First-pass elimination of lidocaine in the rabbit after peroral and rectal route of administration.
Alcorn, GJ; Denson, DD; Elconin, H; Ritschel, WA,
)
0.43
" Bioavailability of lignocaine was greater in the elderly but there was no apparent difference in the rate of absorption."( Protein binding and disposition of lignocaine in the elderly.
Cusack, B; Kelly, JG; Lavan, J; Noel, J; O'Malley, K, 1985
)
0.27
" The pharmacokinetic data suggested that 1% lidocaine does not alter either the elimination parameters or the bioavailability of intramuscularly administered ceftriaxone."( Pharmacokinetics and tolerance of ceftriaxone in humans after single-dose intramuscular administration in water and lidocaine diluents.
Konikoff, J; Parsonnet, M; Patel, IH; Weinfeld, RE, 1982
)
0.74
" Tocainide's long plasma half-life and high oral bioavailability permit an 8-h regime."( Chronic tocainide therapy for refractory high-grade ventricular arrhythmias.
Alpert, JS; Dalen, JE; Haffajee, CI; Howe, JP; Ockene, IS; Paraskos, JA; Sacks, GM, 1983
)
0.27
" In contrast to lignocaine (lidocaine) it is well absorbed after oral administration and has a plasma half-life of about 15 hours."( Tocainide. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy.
Avery, GS; Brogden, RN; Heel, RC; Holmes, B; Speight, TM, 1983
)
0.56
" Flecainide pharmacokinetics are suitable for oral use but encainide disposition is complex with variable bioavailability and active metabolites that contribute substantially to activity."( Clinical profiles of newer class I antiarrhythmic agents--tocainide, mexiletine, encainide, flecainide and lorcainide.
Pottage, A, 1983
)
0.27
" Lorcainide is also a class Ic antiarrhythmic drug, the bioavailability of which is nonlinear."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of the newer antiarrhythmic agents.
Gillis, AM; Kates, RE,
)
0.13
" After cimetidine, lidocaine apparent oral clearance (Clo) reduced 42% +/- 7%; oral bioavailability increased 35% +/- 10%; and systemic clearance (Cls) and volume of distribution at steady-state (Vdss) decreased 21% +/- 6% and 20% +/- 7%."( Lidocaine disposition--sex differences and effects of cimetidine.
Birkett, DJ; Foenander, T; Lillywhite, K; Miners, JO; Wanwimolruk, S; Wing, LM, 1984
)
2.04
" The therapeutic dose, clearance, extraction coefficient, bioavailability and half-life are the object of particular study."( [Pharmacokinetics of anti-arrhythmics. 2. Clinical applications].
Bricaud, H; Lévy, RH; Lévy, S, 1980
)
0.26
"The bioavailability of parental cefamandole, nafate, a new cephalosporin antibiotic, was evaluated with respect to the effects of a lidocaine diluent on its tolerability and absorption after intramuscular administration."( Bioavailability and pain study of cefamandole nafate.
Coonrod, JD; Foster, TS; Shrewsbury, RP,
)
0.34
"For drugs with a high hepatic clearance, bioavailability is low due to the so-called "first pass effect"."( Prediction of bioavailability for drugs with a high first-pass effect using oral clearance data.
Eichelbaum, M; Gugler, R; Somogyi, A, 1982
)
0.26
" Thus, these data provide experimental support for the hypothesis that transient increases in splanchnic blood flow rate observed after a high-protein meal may explain apparent improvement of the oral bioavailability of model high intrinsic clearance drugs."( Effect of food on lidocaine kinetics: mechanism of food-related alteration in high intrinsic clearance drug elimination.
Cole, AF; Elvin, AT; Lalka, D; Pieper, JA; Rolbin, SH, 1981
)
0.6
" In smokers, L systemic bioavailability was decreased secondary to a marked increase in oral clearance, reflecting induction of drug-metabolizing activity."( Effects of smoking and chronic hepatitis B on lidocaine and indocyanine green kinetics.
Huet, PM; Lelorier, J, 1980
)
0.52
" The bioavailability of EO0122 by the oral route exceeded 80% of the oral dose."( A preclinical study of EO-122, a new lidocaine-like antiarrhythmic drug.
Bruckstein, R; Cohen, S; Kaplinsky, E; Kariv, N; Oppenheimer, E, 1980
)
0.53
" Bioavailability was comparable for both methods."( Gas-powered jet injection compared with conventional methods of injection using lignocaine and technetium-99m.
Bowcock, SA; Cooke, ED; Elliott, AT; Johnston, A, 1980
)
0.26
" Also there is no evidence as yet, that patients with liver disease and without a collateral portal circulation do have an increased bioavailability of oral high clearance drugs."( [Drug metabolism in patients with liver disease (author's transl)].
Epping, J; Fuchshofen-Röckel, M; Heusler, H; Richter, E; Zilly, W, 1980
)
0.26
" Lidocaine increased the bioavailability of adrenaline from the intraoral depot."( [Is adrenaline in a 2% lidocaine solution after enoral injection hemodynamically effective?].
Knoll-Köhler, E; Wegner, G, 1995
)
1.51
" Accordingly, the absorption rate of lidocaine by heart tissues increased with time up to 60 min while that of digoxin decreased with time."( Distribution of lidocaine and digoxin in heart tissues and aorta following intrapericardial administration.
Darsinos, JT; Karli, JN; Kontoyanni, M; Krumholz, B; Levis, GM; Moulopoulos, SD; Pistevos, AK; Samouilidou, EC; Theodorakis, MG, 1993
)
0.9
" The rate of absorption of L-[14C]glucose, a passively absorbed molecule, from the lumen was used as an index of the permeability of the mucosa of a perfused segment."( Nutrient-induced changes in the permeability of the rat jejunal mucosa.
Bass, P; See, NA, 1993
)
0.29
" The extent of absorption and bioavailability after airway administration depends on tissue vascularity, sites and techniques of application, patient's disease state, and, most important, the dose/unit body weight."( Seizure after lidocaine for bronchoscopy: case report and review of the use of lidocaine in airway anesthesia.
Razzaghi, A; Souney, PF; Wu, FL,
)
0.49
"PABA is well absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract and acetylated and conjugated in the liver to glycine before being excreted."( Preliminary assessment of glycine conjugation of para-aminobenzoic acid as a quantitative test of liver function.
Barr, SB; Duffy, LF; Kerzner, B; Seeff, L; Soldin, SJ, 1995
)
0.29
" Estimates of the absorption rate constant from the dermis and the elimination rate constant from the perfused limb were made by the simultaneous fitting of absorption and efflux data with a one-compartmental pharmacokinetic model."( The effect of protein binding on the deep tissue penetration and efflux of dermally applied salicylic acid, lidocaine and diazepam in the perfused rat hindlimb.
Cross, SE; Roberts, MS; Wu, Z, 1996
)
0.51
" We studied bioavailability and changes in methemoglobin levels following topical penile exposure to 1 g of EMLA cream for 1 hour in piglets."( Penile absorption of EMLA cream in piglets: implications for use of EMLA in neonatal circumcision.
Gazarian, M; Kent, G; Klein, J; Koren, G; Taddio, A, 1995
)
0.29
" In both cases, a biphasic absorption, a 'flip-flop' model and a complete bioavailability were found."( Pharmacokinetics of oxytetracycline after intramuscular administration with lidocaine in sheep, comparison with a conventional formulation.
Carceles, CM; Guimerá, ME; Moreno, L; Serrano, JM,
)
0.36
"Lignocaine is metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme (CYP3A4), and has a moderate to high extraction ratio resulting in oral bioavailability of 30%."( Effect of erythromycin and itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of oral lignocaine.
Isohanni, MH; Neuvonen, PJ; Olkkola, KT, 1999
)
0.3
"The aim of this work was to study the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine (BUP) and lidocaine (LID) administered separately in rabbits using microdialysis with retrodialysis calibration."( Cerebrospinal fluid bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine and lidocaine after intrathecal and epidural administrations in rabbits using microdialysis.
Chevanne, F; Clement, R; Dollo, G; Le Corre, P; Le Verge, R; Malinovsky, JM, 1999
)
0.74
" The effect of this 'nasal first-pass' should be weighed carefully while considering the fate and the bioavailability of drugs delivered via the intranasal route."( Characterization of lidocaine metabolism by rat nasal microsomes: implications for nasal drug delivery.
Desai, PB; Deshpande, VS; Genter, MB; Jung, C,
)
0.45
" It is suggested that the potentiated local anaesthetic effect of the combination may be partly due to enhanced local bioavailability of lidocaine."( Phenazone potentiates the local anaesthetic effect of lidocaine in mice.
Gillardin, JM; Heulard, I; Verleye, M, 2000
)
0.76
"The quantitative structure-bioavailability relationship of 232 structurally diverse drugs was studied to evaluate the feasibility of constructing a predictive model for the human oral bioavailability of prospective new medicinal agents."( QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
Topliss, JG; Yoshida, F, 2000
)
0.31
"The aim of the present study was to determine the intrathecal bioavailability of a mixture of lidocaine and bupivacaine in a rabbit model of spinal anesthesia by using the microdialysis technique."( Spinal biopharmaceutics of bupivacaine and lidocaine by microdialysis after their simultaneous administration in rabbits.
Chevanne, F; Clément, R; Dollo, G; Le Corre, P; Le Verge, R; Malinovsky, J, 2000
)
0.79
" The bioavailability of lidocaine from the patch formulation averaged 3%, and was similar after single and repeated doses."( Systemic absorption of topical lidocaine in normal volunteers, patients with post-herpetic neuralgia, and patients with acute herpes zoster.
Benowitz, NL; Campbell, BJ; Davies, PS; Jacob, P; Rowbotham, M, 2002
)
0.91
"Microemulsion systems possessing a potentially improved skin bioavailability of lidocaine were designed and explored for some characteristics."( New microemulsion vehicle facilitates percutaneous penetration in vitro and cutaneous drug bioavailability in vivo.
Shapiro, L; Sintov, AC, 2004
)
0.55
"Asparaginase with addition of lidocaine significantly decreases the pain as measured by the visual analog scale without changing the bioavailability or the absorption rate of the enzyme."( Pain intensity and bioavailability of intramuscular asparaginase and a local anesthetic: a double-blinded study.
Albertsen, BK; Clausen, N; Hasle, H; Jakobsen, P; Schrøder, H, 2005
)
0.62
"Design of water-soluble prodrugs may constitute a means to improve the oral bioavailability of drugs suffering from dissolution rate-limited absorption."( Bioreversible quaternary N-acyloxymethyl derivatives of the tertiary amines bupivacaine and lidocaine--synthesis, aqueous solubility and stability in buffer, human plasma and simulated intestinal fluid.
Buur, A; Larsen, C; Nielsen, AB, 2005
)
0.55
" Carbamazepine is a poor water soluble drug and its bioavailability is limited by dissolution rate."( Anesthetic effects of lidocaine hydrochloride gel using low frequency ultrasound of 0.5 MHz.
Jung, DI; Kim, TY; Kim, YI; Shin, SC; Yang, JH, 2007
)
0.65
"Drug distribution in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and the plasma concentration-time profile of 9-AC released from the HPMA copolymer conjugate were predicted using the degradation, transit, and absorption rate constants in cecum."( Pharmacokinetic modeling of absorption behavior of 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC) released from colon-specific HPMA copolymer-9-AC conjugate in rats.
Gao, SQ; Kopecek, J; Kopecková, P; Peterson, CM; Sun, Y, 2008
)
0.35
" The dermal bioavailability (AUC(0-6h)) from the magnetophoretic patch system in vivo, in rats was significantly higher than the similarly designed non-magnetic control patch."( Magnetophoresis for enhancing transdermal drug delivery: Mechanistic studies and patch design.
Bowers, C; Murthy, SN; Sammeta, SM, 2010
)
0.36
"Dissolution critically affects the bioavailability of Biopharmaceutics Classification System class 2 compounds."( Monitoring lidocaine single-crystal dissolution by ultraviolet imaging.
Jensen, H; Larsen, C; Larsen, SW; Rantanen, J; Yaghmur, A; Ye, F; Østergaard, J, 2011
)
0.76
" These results indicate that this technology can be successfully applied to modulate the bioavailability of drugs for percutaneous administration, which could be particularly advantageous in the design of delivery systems that have, simultaneously, the ability to absorb exudates and to adhere to irregular skin surfaces."( Bacterial cellulose membranes applied in topical and transdermal delivery of lidocaine hydrochloride and ibuprofen: in vitro diffusion studies.
Almeida, IF; Costa, P; Freire, CS; Neto, CP; Pinto, PC; Rosado, C; Silvestre, AJ; Trovatti, E, 2012
)
0.61
" Addition of clonidine to the formulations decreased the systemic absorption rate of the anesthetics from the patch application site without impacting the coating performance or the rapid onset of anesthesia."( Adjuvants to prolong the local anesthetic effects of coated microneedle products.
Brown, K; Dohmeier, D; Hansen, K; Siebenaler, K; Zhang, Y, 2012
)
0.38
" The established method in this study could be a potential approach for predicting the bioavailability and/or bioequivalence for transdermal drug delivery systems."( Lidocaine Transdermal Patch: Pharmacokinetic Modeling and In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation (IVIVC).
Kondamudi, PK; Malayandi, R; Mutalik, S; Pillai, R; Tirumalasetty, PP, 2016
)
1.88
"Poor transdermal penetration of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) impairs both bioavailability and therapeutic benefits and is a major challenge in the development of transdermal drug delivery systems."( Lidocaine self-sacrificially improves the skin permeation of the acidic and poorly water-soluble drug etodolac via its transformation into an ionic liquid.
Hamamoto, H; Ishida, T; Miwa, Y, 2016
)
1.88
" We developed a pharmacokinetic model to examine whether bioavailability or absorption rate was different between atomized versus nonatomized lidocaine administration."( The Pharmacokinetics of Atomized Lidocaine Administered via the Trachea: A Randomized Trial.
Kazama, T; Masui, K; Oda, Y; Takaenoki, Y, 2016
)
0.92
" Our pharmacokinetic model estimated a difference of bioavailability between the atomized and the nonatomized lidocaine (0."( The Pharmacokinetics of Atomized Lidocaine Administered via the Trachea: A Randomized Trial.
Kazama, T; Masui, K; Oda, Y; Takaenoki, Y, 2016
)
0.93
"Transdermal local anesthesia is one of the most applied strategies to avoid systemic adverse effects; there is an appealing need for a prolonged local anesthetic that would provide better bioavailability and longer pain relief with a single administration."( Local anesthetic lidocaine delivery system: chitosan and hyaluronic acid-modified layer-by-layer lipid nanoparticles.
Chi, H; Wang, J; Wang, S; Zhang, L, 2016
)
0.77
" Adrenaline decreased the absorption rate of lidocaine and prolonged the duration of its absorption."( Pharmacokinetics of Lidocaine Hydrochloride Administered with or without Adrenaline for the Paravertebral Brachial Plexus Block in Dogs.
Choquette, A; Del Castillo, JR; Guillot, M; Troncy, E; Varin, F, 2017
)
1.04
" Moreover, hERG and BBB-PAMPA assays presented safe cardiotoxicity and high CNS bioavailability profiles for 5x."( Discovery of 1-(3-(benzyloxy)pyridin-2-yl)-3-(2-(piperazin-1-yl)ethyl)urea: A new modulator for amyloid beta-induced mitochondrial dysfunction.
Elkamhawy, A; Hassan, AHE; Lee, J; Moon, B; Pae, AN; Park, BG; Park, HM; Park, JE; Ra, H; Roh, EJ, 2017
)
0.46
" The estimates (between subject variability; relative standard error, %) of apparent volume, apparent clearance, tumescent absorption rate, and instillation absorption rate were 195."( Population pharmacokinetic model for tumescent lidocaine in women undergoing breast cancer surgery.
Allanioux, L; Blin, O; Bourgoin, A; Guilhaumou, R; Leone, M; Marsot, A; Riff, C, 2018
)
0.74
"Lidocaine's (Lido) low water solubility and negligible tissue uptake limit its bioavailability when applied to the skin."( Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for enhanced lidocaine skin delivery.
Houshiar, M; Maibach, HI; Nafisi, S; Samadi, N, 2018
)
2.18
"Over the past decade, the formation of pharmaceutical eutectics has become a very attractive strategy to increase the bioavailability of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs)."( The effect of electrostatic interactions on the formation of pharmaceutical eutectics.
Knapik-Kowalczuk, J; Paluch, M; Sherif, A; Smolka, W; Tajber, L; Wojnarowska, Z; Zotova, J, 2018
)
0.48
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
"The controlled release of drug from drug carrier has been a point of concern for the researchers to ensure the bioavailability of drug with reduced side effects."( Kinetics and controlled release of lidocaine from novel carrageenan and alginate-based blend hydrogels.
Ata, S; Azeem, MK; Islam, A; Khan, RU; Mahmood, HA; Mehmood, A; Qureshi, AUR; Rasool, A; Rizwan, M, 2020
)
0.84
"Unlike fentanyl, lignocaine does not impair the bioavailability or delay the antiplatelet effect of ticagrelor."( Effects of lignocaine vs. opioids on antiplatelet activity of ticagrelor: the LOCAL trial.
Duffy, SJ; Duong, T; Fernando, H; Huynh, K; Meikle, PJ; Myles, PS; Nehme, Z; Noonan, J; Peter, K; Shaw, J; Smith, K; Stub, D, 2021
)
0.62
"Opioid analgesia has been shown to interfere with the bioavailability of oral P2Y12 inhibitors prompting the search for safe and effective non-opioid analgesics to treat ischaemic chest pain."( LidocAine Versus Opioids In MyocarDial infarction: the AVOID-2 randomized controlled trial.
Andrew, E; Bernard, S; Brennan, A; Dinh, D; Fernando, H; Lefkovits, J; Milne, C; Myles, PS; Nehme, Z; O'Brien, J; Peter, K; Smith, K; Stephenson, M; Stub, D; Taylor, AJ, 2023
)
2.35

Dosage Studied

29 patients were injected with 100 mouse units of botulinum toxin A (Botox); Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland, Westport, Ireland. The methods allowed local measurement of lidocaine in stratum corneum, punch biopsies, and plasma.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" The dose-response curve suggests that a monomolecular interacting takes place between NA and pharmacological receptors present in the septal area."( Effects of catecholamines injected into the septal area of the rat brain on natriuresis, kaliuresis and diuresis.
Antunes-Rodrigues, J; Camargo, LA; Covian, MR; Gentil, CG; Netto, CR; Saad, WA, 1976
)
0.26
"The effect of lidocaine was studied in guinea pig trachealis muscle by dose-response reversal and protection of agonist-induced contractures in a superfusion system."( The effect of local anesthetic, lidocaine, on guinea pig trachealis muscle in vitro.
Anderson, WH; O'Brien, KP; Weiss, EB, 1975
)
0.9
" Pharmacokinetic studies in man show wide variability in drug disposition between patients, even when cardiac and hepatic status is considered, making specific dosing recommendations a problem."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of lignocaine.
Benowitz, NL; Meister, W,
)
0.13
" The basic principles of pharmacokinetics are outlined and their application to the design of dosage regimens described."( Pharmacokinetics of antiarrhythmic drugs.
Shand, DG; Woosley, RL, 1978
)
0.26
" The recommended dosage is 100 mg given as an intravenous bolus followed by 2 to 4 mg/min as an infusion, which should be given by infusion pump."( Prophylactic lidocaine in suspected acute myocardial infarction.
Bernstein, IJ; Geiderman, JM; Goodman, SL, 1979
)
0.63
" Finally possible connections are presented between high dosage administered lidocaine and conversion to normal sinus rhythm."( [Lidocaine administration in a patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and atrial fibrillation (author's transl)].
Marzaloni, M; Rossi, F; Rusconi, L; Sermasi, S, 1979
)
1.4
" It is important to know how the pharmacokinetics of a drug vary with different disease states so that appropriate adjustments to dosage can be made."( Series on pharmacology in practice. 2. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
Federman, J; Vlietstra, RE, 1979
)
0.26
" In 35 cases, the dosage of the drug to be administered was calculated on the basis of an empirical formula and in the other 35, the dose was based on body weight."( Caudal anesthesia in infants.
Hassan, SZ,
)
0.13
" The dose-response relationship revealed that procaine inhibited the resting membrane conductance almost completely in a one-to-one manner with the dissociation constant of about 1 mM."( The effect of procaine on the passive electrical properties of guinea-pig ventricular muscle.
Hashimoto, K; Ochi, R, 1978
)
0.26
" Dose-response curves for morphine and lidocaine indicated that morphine has greater potency and efficacy."( Analgesic properties of lidocaine in mice.
Burney, RG; Moore, PA,
)
0.71
" The need for limiting the dosage of local anesthetic agents is stressed."( [New aspects of field blocks and peripheral nerve blocks (author's transl)].
Schulte-Steinberg, O, 1977
)
0.26
" By using a modified jet injector instead of the standard syringe-and-needle technique, we obtained equal analgesia with one fifth of the standard milligram dosage of lidocaine in patients undergoing therapeutic abortion."( A safer method for paracervical block in therapeutic abortions.
McKenzie, R; Shaffer, WL, 1978
)
0.45
" Since indocyanine green clearance can be determined rapidly and noninvasively, it offers the potential of predicting lidocaine dosage requirements with avoidance of toxicity or suboptimum therapy."( Lidocaine kinetics predicted by indocyanine green clearance.
Reid, PR; Zito, RA, 1978
)
1.91
" Experiments on the dose-response and time course of the effect oflidocaine showed that incubation of normal macrophages with 10 mM lidocaine for 10 min at 28 C was enough for induction of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity."( In vitro induction of antibody-dependent cytotoxic macrophages by the local anesthetic lidocaine.
Kurisu, M; Mizuno, D; Yamazaki, M, 1978
)
0.72
"Neuro-Demoplas was compared in a double blind trial on behalf of its analgesic properties to another antiphologistic containing high dosage of vitamin B complex and Metamizol."( [Analgesic effect of Neuro-Demoplas in a double-blind test].
Gabka, J, 1976
)
0.26
" By these mechanisms, cardiac failure potentially affects absorption and disposition characteristics of drugs, which may necessitate adjustment in dosage regimen for optimum therapy."( Pharmacokinetics in patients with cardiac failure.
Benowitz, NL; Meister, W,
)
0.13
" All the drugs caused rapid retraction of the neurites, which was reversible in all cases but for sodium dodecyl sulphate, and showed a sigmoid dose-response relationship."( Reversal of morphological differentiation of mouse neuroblastoma cells by mitosis-inhibitors and anesthetics.
Edström, A; Erkell, LJ; Hansson, HA, 1975
)
0.25
" A dose-response curve indicated that maximum responses were obtained at the 1000-microng/ml concentration (0."( Response of arterial segments from gravid human uterus to multiple concentrations of lignocaine.
Gibbs, CP; Noel, SC, 1977
)
0.26
" The pharmacokinetic characteristics of a drug as well as the severity of liver disease should be taken into account when considering drug dosage in patients with chronic liver disease."( Antipyrine, paracetamol, and lignocaine elimination in chronic liver disease.
Adjepon-Yamoah, KK; Finlayson, ND; Forrest, JA; Prescott, LF, 1977
)
0.26
" However, as illustrated by this case report, anesthetic dosage must be selected with great care, and patients unable to describe paresthesias should be excluded from use of this procedure."( An unusual complication of lumbosacral plexus block: a case report.
Muravchick, S; Owens, WD,
)
0.13
" Dosage should be related to body weight and the blood pressure cuff should be maintained at higher than systolic pressure for a minimum of 15 minutes after the lidocaine is injected."( Intravenous regional anesthesia for closed treatment of fractures and dislocations of the upper extremities.
Schiller, MG,
)
0.33
" High frequency and long duration of block can be attained if sufficiently high concentrations of TTX are used, although latency is long and high dosage may produce systemic toxicity."( The local anesthetic activity of tetrodotoxin alone and in combination with vasoconstrictors and local anesthetics.
Adams, HJ; Blair, MR; Takman, BH,
)
0.13
" For example, intermittent application of a particular dosage results in lower blood levels, and allowing sufficient time between doses reduces the amount necessary to obtain the desired anesthesia."( Local anesthesia in otolaryngology. A re-evaluation.
Schenck, NL,
)
0.13
"Pentazocine, a systemic analgesic, can be utilized in local analgesic and intravenous techniques to provide better operating conditions in difficult cases, a reduction in the dosage of other agents employed, and a smoother recovery period."( The value of associating pentazocine with drugs used in accepted intravenous techniques.
Armstrong, PJ, 1975
)
0.25
" A better understanding of quantitative aspects of the disposition and absorption of these drugs should assist the anaesthetist in deciding the optimal agent and dosage for regional block techniques."( Pharmacology of local anaesthetic agents. Pharmacokinetics of local anaesthetic agents.
Mather, LE; Tucker, GT, 1975
)
0.25
" The dosage required to produce symptoms can be compared with other drugs."( Evaluation of clinical tolerance of local anaesthetic agents.
Scott, DB, 1975
)
0.25
" For the often seriously ill infants with convulsions it is therefore difficult to construct rational maintenance dose schedules, and optimal dosage must be based on repeated determinations of the plasma concentration."( Plasma concentrations of phenobarbital in the treatment of seizures in newborns.
Jalling, B, 1975
)
0.25
" Use of a pulse-wave monitor permitted limiting the dosage of local anesthetic, usually to 5 to 10 ml."( Use of the pulse-wave monitor as a measurement of diagnostic sympathetic block and of surgical sympathectomy.
Arakawa, K; Kim, JM; VonLintel, T,
)
0.13
" In a guarded ward for coronary diseases since 1972 all patients with a fresh myocardial infarction or suspicion of infarction were treated with a continuous intravenous lidocain drip in a dosage of 100 mg/per hour for 48 hours."( [Possibilities of a routine prevention of arrhythmia in the early phase of acute myocardial infarct].
Fiehring, H; Kulick, B; Schaedel, H; Steffen, V, 1975
)
0.25
"28 mug/ml being so in the nontoxic dosage range."( Ultrasonic nebulizer in local anesthesia for bronchoscopy.
Jokinen, K; Karvonen, P; Palva, T; Saloheimo, M, 1975
)
0.25
" Dose-response curves determined in nonpregnant ewes indicate that significant decreases in blood flow may occur at arterial blood concentrations encountered clinically."( Effects of local anesthetic agents on the uterine vasculatures and myometrium.
Anderson, SG; Greiss, FC; Still, JG, 1976
)
0.26
" The dye leakage response to nasal capsaicin challenge was abolished by pretreatment with topical lidocaine, general substance P analogue, topical or general high dosage capsaicin."( Study on the dye leakage response of nasal mucosa following topical, capsaicin challenge in guinea pigs.
Asakura, K; Kataura, A; Kojima, T; Narita, S; Shirasaki, H, 1992
)
0.5
"5 mg/kg/h infusion) and lidocaine (5 mg/kg loading dose, 4 mg/kg/h infusion) were dosed to achieve therapeutic concentrations."( Defibrillation energy requirements during moricizine and moricizine-lidocaine therapy.
Chow, M; Fan, C; Kluger, J; O'Rangers, EA; Ujhelyi, MR, 1992
)
0.83
" The significance of these findings on systemic toxicity, dosage and onset of action of lignocaine need to be investigated."( The effect of dextran on the pharmacokinetics of lignocaine during epidural anaesthesia.
Alkhawajah, A; Farag, H, 1992
)
0.28
" An increase in the dosage failed to show better analgesia."( Clinical investigation of potency and onset of different lidocaine sprays for topical anesthesia in dentistry.
Daubländer, M; Kleeman, PP; Roth, W, 1992
)
0.53
" In cases with heart disease and elderly subjects, a lower dosage or omission of atropine was common."( [Manipulation, premedication, and chemoprophylaxis for fiberoptic bronchoscopy].
Hasegawa, Y; Ogasawara, T; Saka, H; Shimokata, K; Watanabe, A, 1992
)
0.28
" The higher lidocaine dosage administered (21 mg) did not intensify the positive impact on the cardiovascular parameters compared to the lower dosage (14 mg)."( Effects of different lidocaine sprays for topical anesthesia on cardiovascular parameters and oxygen saturation.
Daubländer, M; Lipp, M; Roth, W, 1992
)
0.98
" Increasing the dosage of lidocaine from 500 to 650 mg makes the block very successful without any toxic side-effects."( [Combined sciatic 3-in-1 block. Application in lower limb orthopedic surgery].
Elmas, C; Elmas, Y; Gautschi, P; Uehlinger, P, 1992
)
0.58
" In contrast, at the low dose of either local anesthetic, after the resolution of the transient motor weakness, these doses resulted in a significant leftward shift in the dose-response curves for intrathecal morphine on both the hot plate and paw pressure, as measured by the maximum observed peak effect and by the area under the time-effect curve."( Interaction of intrathecal morphine with bupivacaine and lidocaine in the rat.
Penning, JP; Yaksh, TL, 1992
)
0.53
" Topical anesthetic dosage data were replicated in 12 additional patients studied by a different bronchoscopist."( Aerosolized lidocaine reduces dose of topical anesthetic for bronchoscopy.
Foster, WM; Hurewitz, AN, 1992
)
0.66
"The predictive performance of two computer programs for lidocaine dosing were evaluated."( Predictive performance of Bayesian and nonlinear least-squares regression programs for lidocaine.
Destache, CJ; Hilleman, DE; Lang, PT; Mohiuddin, SJ, 1992
)
0.75
" A dose-response relationship between benzocaine and MHb was investigated."( Topical anesthetic-induced methemoglobinemia in sheep: a comparison of benzocaine and lidocaine.
Guertler, AT; Lagutchik, MS; Martin, DG, 1992
)
0.51
" Although the propofol dosage requirements to maintain comparable levels of sedation were similar in both groups, midazolam decreased patients' recall of intraoperative events (e."( Midazolam in combination with propofol for sedation during local anesthesia.
Ghouri, AF; Taylor, E; White, PF,
)
0.13
"A method for carrying out dose-response studies of ion channel currents in cell-attached patches has been devised."( Single-channel dose-response studies in single, cell-attached patches.
Auerbach, A, 1991
)
0.28
" Intrathecal lidocaine in the dosage range tested during isobolographic analysis revealed no motor deficits."( Antinociceptive synergy between intrathecal morphine and lidocaine during visceral and somatic nociception in the rat.
Gebhart, GF; Maves, TJ, 1992
)
0.9
" To ascertain whether test dosing with other agents might be more useful, we sought to determine if and at what dose levels three different intravenous drugs (adrenaline, isoprenaline and 1% lignocaine with 1/200,000 adrenaline) produced an increase in heart rate (HR) in halothane-anaesthetized lambs."( Efficacy of adrenaline, lignocaine-adrenaline and isoprenaline as a test dose in halothane-anaesthetized lambs.
Berde, CB; Desparmet, JF; Hershenson, MB; Lunn, RJ; Schwartz, DC, 1991
)
0.28
"With regard to the inhibition of contractility, dose-response curves of ryanodine and nickel were produced, and in these curves ID50 values were 10(-6) M and 2 x 10(-3) M, respectively."( [The effect of local anesthetics on the isolated human right atrial appendages--Part 2: Bupivacaine is different from lidocaine concerning the mechanism of inhibition of contractility].
Itoh, H; Minakuchi, C, 1991
)
0.49
"Perioperative antiarrhythmic therapy with lidocaine (bolus dosage 100 mg followed by infusion of 200 mg/h) was performed in 24 patients; 12 of them simultaneously received an intravenous injection of 10 mg midazolam with the bolus of lidocaine (group I: with midazolam; group II: without midazolam)."( [Is the plasma protein binding of lidocaine modified by the simultaneous administration of midazolam?].
Bachmann-M, B; Biscoping, J; Hempelmann, G; Schürg, R, 1991
)
0.82
"5 cc total volume; Volume II = diluted to 6 cc total volume; Volume III = diluted to 12 cc total volume; Volume IV = diluted to 25 cc total volume) by the same technique of administration and in the same dosage of 4 mg/kg."( Differences in plasma lidocaine levels with endotracheal drug therapy secondary to total volume of diluent administered.
Mace, SE, 1990
)
0.59
" Dosage adjustment of SUN 1165 is necessary in renal failure."( Pharmacokinetics of SUN 1165, a new antiarrhythmic agent, in renal dysfunction.
Hara, H; Hashimoto, N; Ishida, Y; Nakamura, S; Ohta, H; Sasaki, T; Satoh, S; Takabatake, T; Ushiogi, Y; Yamamoto, Y, 1991
)
0.28
" This suggests that the dosage of endotracheal medication may need to be adjusted for various clinical conditions such as shock."( Plasma lidocaine levels occurring with endotracheal administration during hemorrhagic shock.
Mace, SE, 1990
)
0.73
" Statistical analysis using the unpaired Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney test found no significant differences between the two groups regarding time of onset of analgesia, degree of spread of analgesia, time to maximum motor blockade, degree of motor blockade, length of surgical procedure, total anesthesia time, regression of anesthesia, dosage of lidocaine used, and serum lidocaine levels."( Lidocaine hydrochloride versus lidocaine bicarbonate for epidural anesthesia in outpatients undergoing arthroscopic surgery.
Rosenberg, H; Siler, JN,
)
1.74
" A safe upper limit for lidocaine dosage using the tumescent technique is estimated to be 35 mg/kg."( Tumescent technique for regional anesthesia permits lidocaine doses of 35 mg/kg for liposuction.
Klein, JA, 1990
)
0.84
" The cause for the insufficient effectiveness of the antiarrhythmic agents in various interventional studies has been attributed to a limited number of patients, rigid dosing regimens, inadequate suppression of VPBs and a high incidence of adverse reactions."( New aspects of the clinical use of anti-arrhythmia agents with special reference to acute therapy of ventricular tachycardia (lidocaine vs. ajmaline).
Jung, W; Lüderitz, B; Manz, M; Mletzko, R, 1990
)
0.49
" A maximal safe dosage of dilute lidocaine using the tumescent technique is estimated to be 35 mg/kg."( The tumescent technique. Anesthesia and modified liposuction technique.
Klein, JA, 1990
)
0.56
" Side effects and other therapeutic problems encountered when the therapeutic modality is switched or adjusted can be greatly reduced by careful dosing and selection of the optimal combination substances."( Lidocaine in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction: the controversy over prophylactic or selective use.
Just, H; Kasper, W; Zehender, M, 1990
)
1.72
"5 micrograms/mL with the dosage used."( What is the optimal volume of administration for endobronchial drugs?
Ahnefeld, FW; Hähnel, JH; Lindner, KH; Prengel, A; Schürmann, C, 1990
)
0.28
"Forty-five patients were evaluated during knee arthroscopy performed using local anesthesia produced by lidocaine with epinephrine to determine the dose-response relationship for operative analgesia."( Lidocaine local anesthesia for arthroscopic knee surgery.
Dahl, MR; Dasta, JF; McSweeney, TD; Zuelzer, W, 1990
)
1.94
" Meticulous surgical technique combined with local anesthesia and some form of intravenous sedation in minimal therapeutic dosage will provide satisfactory conditions to perform surgical arthroscopy of the knee."( Arthroscopic surgery of the knee under local anesthesia.
Bruce, R; Conahan, TJ; Kitz, DS; Torg, JS; Yacobucci, GN, 1990
)
0.28
" Repeat lignocaine injections were given over a wider dosage range (0."( Effect of lignocaine on coronary blood flow, systolic myocardial function and myocardial high energy phosphate stores in swine.
Angello, D; Gee, D; Joyce, M; Perlmutter, N; Wilson, R, 1990
)
0.28
" Antiarrhythmic drug testing carried out in the late reperfusion phase with lidocaine (1 mg/kg bolus followed by continuous infusion) revealed 50% efficacy at a dosage of 40 micrograms/kg/min, 100% at 80 micrograms/kg/min, and 67% at 120 mu/kg/min."( Programmed electrical stimulation after myocardial infarction and reperfusion in conscious dogs.
Krumpl, G; Raberger, G; Schunder-Tatzber, S; Todt, H, 1990
)
0.51
" Infusion of any drug during and after general anesthesia requires scrupulous attention to dosage determination and to the clinical condition of the patient receiving the infusion."( Delayed awakening due to lidocaine overdose.
Bruce, DL; Douglas, JH; Ross, JD,
)
0.43
" In groups B, C, and D, lidocaine as laryngotracheal spray, transtracheal injection or intravenous injection in a dosage of 1 mg/kg BW was administered prior to endotracheal intubation."( The effect of various administration routes of lidocaine on hemodynamics and ECG rhythm during endotracheal intubation.
Abdulla, WY; Asfar, SN, 1990
)
0.84
"In the smooth muscle of the rat vas deferens, 10(-5) M cocaine shifted the dose-response curve to norepinephrine to the left and enhanced the maximal contractions to norepinephrine and methacholine."( Propranolol blocks cocaine-induced potentiation of the contraction in the smooth muscle of the rat vas deferens.
Gomi, Y; Inagaki, O; Kasuya, Y; Ono, K; Suzuki, N, 1990
)
0.28
" Hence, the parallel shift produced by benzocaine on the dose-response (fraction of blocked Vmax) curves of lidocaine, strongly suggests that both drugs competed for the same receptor site."( Interaction of lidocaine and benzocaine in depressing Vmax of ventricular action potentials.
Chapula, JS, 1985
)
0.83
" Analysis of cumulative dose-response curves showed that the two local anesthetics antagonized methoxamine and inhibited the field-stimulation response."( Effects of lidocaine and procaine on canine nasal blood vessels.
Jackson, RT; Wang, HW,
)
0.52
" Lidocaine dosage was 2 mg/kg followed by a 70 micrograms/kg/min infusion and metoprolol dosage was a 75 micrograms/kg bolus."( Interaction of metoprolol and lidocaine on the ventricular fibrillation threshold in the anesthetized dog.
Balke, CW; de Langen, CD; Levine, JH; Moore, EN; Spear, JF, 1988
)
1.47
"A controlled double-blind investigation was undertaken in which ten patients with painful bone metastases were treated with intravenous lignocaine in a dosage of 5 mg/kg body-weight infused over a period of 30 minutes or the same volume of isotonic saline."( [Intravenous lidocaine in the treatment of chronic pain caused by bone metastases].
Banning, AM; Gefke, K; Hebsgaard, K; Petersen, P; Sjøgren, P, 1989
)
0.65
" This dosage of propafenone did not provoke serious adverse effects in our patient."( Lidocaine, mexiletine and propafenone in the treatment of arrhythmias complicating myocardial infarction. A case report.
Aguglia, F; De Marzio, P; Gnecchi, M, 1985
)
1.71
" To investigate the role of systemic absorption in the production of epidural analgesia, the previously utilized epidural xylazine dosage was given intramuscularly to four adult cows."( Caudal epidural analgesia in cattle using xylazine.
Caron, JP; LeBlanc, PH, 1989
)
0.28
" Thus lignocaine is variably and incompletely absorbed when administered by the intranasal route, in the dosage formulation and according to the method used in this study."( The bioavailability of intranasal lignocaine.
Fraser, DG; Greenblatt, DJ; Scavone, JM, 1989
)
0.28
" Dose-response curves were constructed from the data obtained, and the CD50 and LD50 values for each local anesthetic alone and in combination with each of the vasoconstrictors were calculated by probit analysis."( Modification of local anesthetic toxicity by vasoconstrictors.
Dorris, RL; Taylor, SE,
)
0.13
" PD20 was interpolated from the dose-response curve, relating the dose of cold air on a non-cumulative logarithmic scale on the abscissa and the percentage change in FEV1 on the ordinate."( Inhaled lignocaine does not alter bronchial hyperresponsiveness to hyperventilation of dry cold air in asthmatic subjects.
Caire, N; Cartier, A; Ghezzo, H; L'Archevêque, J; Malo, JL, 1989
)
0.28
" The authors question whether amounts of lidocaine greater than the recommended dosage may be safely used in the patient undergoing lipoplasty of the torso and knees."( The use of high-dose lidocaine in wetting solutions for lipoplasty.
Hepper, T; Lewis, CM, 1989
)
0.86
" Fourteen elderly subjects aged 60-72 years (mean 67 years) and five young subjects age 31-48 years (mean 42 years) were compared with respect to dosage requirements to achieve satisfactory local anesthesia, rate and extent of lidocaine systemic absorption, plasma drug levels, elimination half-life, and drug side effects."( Systemic absorption of topical lidocaine in elderly and young adults undergoing bronchoscopy.
Ameer, B; Burlingame, MB; Harman, EM, 1989
)
0.75
" Dose-response curves were constructed evaluating the relationship between the duration of balloon inflation versus the percentage of animals with a sustained neurologic deficit."( Halothane, fentanyl/nitrous oxide, and spinal lidocaine protect against spinal cord injury in the rat.
Cole, DJ; Drummond, JC; Shapiro, HM; Zivin, JA, 1989
)
0.54
" This suggests that under specific circumstances and with certain operative procedures, lidocaine dosing can be liberalized."( Plasma lidocaine levels during augmentation mammaplasty and suction-assisted lipectomy.
Bennie, JB; Fernando, B; Gumucio, CA; Kraemer, BA; Roa, N; Young, VL, 1989
)
0.95
"Pregnant Long-Evans hooded rats were dosed via injections into the gum with 3, 6, or 9 mg/kg lidocaine, or vehicle, or were uninjected, on gestational day 4 (GD4), GD11, or GD18."( Behavioral effects of prenatal exposure to lidocaine in the rat: effects of dosage and of gestational age at administration.
Kurkjian, MF; Kurtz, SL; Mattran, KM; Smith, RF,
)
0.61
" The results indicated that the dosage of CRL and Lid generally used in anti-arrhythmic therapy basically exerted no harm to myocytes."( [Cytotoxic effects of changrolin, lidocaine and amiodarone on ultrastructure of cultured rat beating cardiac myocytes].
Chen, HZ; Chen, WZ; Gong, ZX; Guo, Q; Jin, PY; Pen, BZ; Shen, JY; Yang, XY; Yang, YZ, 1989
)
0.56
" Both the dose-response curve and the kinetics of the cocaine-induced closures indicate that there is a single class of cocaine-binding site."( Cocaine-induced closures of single batrachotoxin-activated Na+ channels in planar lipid bilayers.
Wang, GK, 1988
)
0.27
" Serious adverse reactions necessitate a change in antiarrhythmic therapy, as opposed to lowering drug dosage to an ineffective level."( Antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Recent advances and current status.
Somberg, J, 1985
)
0.27
" A dose-response relationship for cimetidine and ranitidine was developed, confirming the greater potency of cimetidine."( Effect of H2-receptor antagonists on steady-state extraction of indocyanine green and lidocaine by the perfused rat liver.
Heath, CA; Johnson, RF; Roberts, RK; Schenker, S; Speeg, KV, 1986
)
0.49
" The major pathways for elimination of lidocaine in the rat were deethylation and hydroxylation, and subsequent elimination along these pathways accounted for the poor material balance at low dosage levels."( Mechanisms of lidocaine kinetics in the isolated perfused rat liver. II. Kinetics of steady state elimination.
Gray, MR; Saville, BA; Tam, YK,
)
0.76
"The performance of the Bayesian feedback method for predicting lignocaine dosage developed by Vozeh et al."( Prediction of individual dosage requirements for lignocaine: a validation study for Bayesian forecasting in Japanese patients.
Hirayama, H; Nagashima, S; Nakashima, M; Sato, R; Tsuchiya, N; Uematsu, T; Yamazaki, T, 1989
)
0.28
" Whereas LV peak dP/dt and LV (dP/dt)/DP40 were significantly decreased after the low dosage of lidocaine, these indexes returned to control values after the 10th min of infusion of the high dosage."( Effects of lidocaine on myocardial contractility and baroreflex control of heart rate in conscious dogs.
Berdeaux, A; Edouard, A; Giudicelli, JF; Langloys, J; Noviant, Y; Samii, K, 1986
)
0.88
" Our results show that lidocaine, in the dosage given here, does not influence incidence or mechanisms of reperfusion tachyarrhythmias."( [Ineffective use of lidocaine in preventing reperfusion arrhythmias in patients with acute myocardial infarct].
Jannasch, B; Kuck, KH; Mathey, DG; Schlüter, M; Schofer, J, 1985
)
0.9
" If lidocaine is used in a dosage of less than 3 mg/kg, toxic levels of the drug are unlikely to occur."( Systemic absorption of tetracycline and lidocaine following intrapleural instillation.
Barbarash, RA; Sahn, SA; Strange, C; Wooten, SA, 1988
)
1.1
" Furthermore, collecting bronchial washings late in the procedure or limiting the lidocaine dosage do not reliably decrease measured lidocaine concentrations."( Lidocaine concentrations in bronchoscopic specimens.
Barbarash, RA; Heffner, JE; Strange, C, 1988
)
1.94
" infusion of 6 mg/kg/hour was the most effective dosage and had an immediate anticonvulsive effect in 18 of 25 infants; within 30 min the same effect was attained in another five of the infants, with an overall seizure control in 92% of the sample population."( Lidocaine for treatment of severe seizures in newborn infants. I. Clinical effects and cerebral electrical activity monitoring.
Hellström-Westas, L; Rosén, I; Svenningsen, NW; Westgren, U, 1988
)
1.72
"5%) was administered in a dosage of 3 mg/kgm body weight, but dosages of 2 mg/kgm were used in each arm of a child with bilateral injuries."( Intravenous regional anaesthesia for the treatment of upper limb injuries in childhood.
Batten, JB; Cole, WG; Eyres, RL; Hjorth, D; Ross, ER; Turner, PL, 1986
)
0.27
" We conclude that lidocaine, when administered as an adjunct to fentanyl in the dosage used in this study, can cause cardiovascular depression, and is of minimal benefit in preventing hemodynamic abnormalities after sternotomy during coronary artery bypass graft surgery."( Evaluation of lidocaine as an adjunct to fentanyl anesthesia for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Kasten, GW; Owens, E, 1986
)
0.97
" Patients without infarction who received lidocaine had more adverse effects than similarly dosed patients with infarction (64% vs."( Character of adverse effects of prophylactic lidocaine in the coronary care unit.
Kellen, J; Rademaker, AW; Tam, YK; Wyse, DG, 1986
)
0.8
" Pharmacokinetic data for drugs administered endotracheally are lacking; therefore, dosage recommendations are empirical."( Endotracheal drug therapy in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Raehl, CL, 1986
)
0.27
"Since lidocaine exhibits significant variation in serum protein binding, the availability of a practical method for measuring free lidocaine concentration could contribute to the optimization of individual lidocaine dosage regimens."( Measurement of lidocaine free concentration.
Allerheiligen, SR; Beach, CL; Clementi, WA; Ludden, TM, 1986
)
1.1
"The performance of a computerized dosing aid in achieving a target serum concentration of lidocaine in the middle of the recommended therapeutic range (3."( Computer-assisted individualized lidocaine dosage: clinical evaluation and comparison with physician performance.
Follath, F; Kaufman, G; Ritz, R; Schmidlin, O; Scholer, A; Uematsu, T; Vozeh, S, 1987
)
0.78
"Dosing regimens used in clinical practice are often complex, involving several different routes of administration, dose sizes, dosing rates, and dosing intervals and durations."( Efficient pharmacokinetic modeling of complex clinical dosing regimens: the universal elementary dosing regimen and computer algorithm EDFAST.
Kreeft, JH; Sebaldt, RJ, 1987
)
0.27
" With the dosage regimen used serum concentrations considerably above the suggested therapeutic level were achieved in the majority of patients."( Displacement of lidocaine from human plasma proteins by disopyramide.
Angelo, HR; Bonde, J; Burgaard, P; Graudal, N; Jensen, NM; Kampmann, JP; Pedersen, LE, 1987
)
0.62
" We retrospectively reviewed all our consultations for evaluation of local anesthetic allergy from 1965 to 1985 to assess the safety and efficacy of skin testing and provocative test dosing with a variety of local anesthetic agents."( Provocative challenge with local anesthetics in patients with a prior history of reaction.
Chandler, MJ; Grammer, LC; Patterson, R, 1987
)
0.27
" We calculated the provocative concentration of LTD4 required to produce a 35% fall in SGaw (PC35SGaw) or a 30% fall in V30P (PC30V30P) and the slope of the LTD4 dose-response curve."( Mechanism of leukotriene D4-induced bronchoconstriction in normal subject.
Bernstein, PR; Kern, R; Krell, RD; Patterson, R; Smith, LJ, 1987
)
0.27
"A slurry of activated carbon (activated charcoal) in electrolyte replacement solution given by stomach tube and antiarrhythmic drugs given parenterally cured 9 of 11 calves dosed 7 to 24 h previously with a lethal amount (20g/kg) of Bryophyllum tubiflorum flower heads."( Curing experimental Bryophyllum tubiflorum poisoning of cattle with activated carbon, electrolyte replacement solution and antiarrhythmic drugs.
Dunster, PJ; McKenzie, RA, 1987
)
0.27
" We believe that in these cases the dosage of fentanyl was inadequate and since increasing the dosage of fentanyl to at least 50 micrograms."( Precipitous bradycardia induced by laryngoscopy in cardiac surgical patients.
Podolakin, W; Wells, DG, 1987
)
0.27
" was 31%, and between 32% and 53% for the rectal dosage forms."( Rectal bioavailability of lidocaine in the dog: evaluation of first-pass elimination.
Denson, DD; Grummich, KW; Hussain, AS; Ritschel, BE; Ritschel, WA, 1987
)
0.57
" The laboratory session was rescheduled 2 weeks later, using the same ewes and a reduced dosage of lidocaine hydrochloride (10 mg/kg)."( Iatrogenic lidocaine toxicosis in ewes.
Scarratt, WK; Troutt, HF, 1986
)
0.88
" Dosing had no effect upon birth and growth, shuttle box, or footshock sensitivity."( Behavioral effects of mid-pregnancy administration of lidocaine and mepivacaine in the rat.
Hollenbeck, AR; Kurtz, SL; Mattran, KM; Smith, RF; Wharton, GG,
)
0.38
" These preliminary data clearly demonstrated a decrease in lidocaine elimination in patients submitted to mechanical ventilation, but the magnitude of dosage adjustment of such a highly hepatic-extracted drug in patients submitted to mechanical ventilation remains to be investigated."( Effect of mechanical ventilation on hepatic drug pharmacokinetics.
Auzépy, P; Berdeaux, A; Delion, F; Giudicelli, JF; Richard, C; Rimailho, A; Riou, B, 1986
)
0.51
" Therefore, increases in total lidocaine concentrations after cimetidine administration were considerably less than those previously reported and empiric dosage reductions of lidocaine in patients receiving cimetidine may not be appropriate."( The effect of oral cimetidine on total and unbound serum lidocaine concentrations in patients with suspected myocardial infarction.
Bauman, JL; Berk, SI; Douglas, JB; Gal, P; McCue, JD; Powell, JR, 1987
)
0.8
" It is written so that the clinician can integrate patient demographics and drug levels to design a new dosage regimen tailored to an individual patient."( Computer-assisted drug assay interpretation based on Bayesian estimation of individual pharmacokinetics: application to lidocaine.
Hillman, R; Ludden, T; Sheiner, L; Vozeh, S; Wandell, M, 1985
)
0.48
" When administered over the dosage range 1-16% (v/v) intradermally, or by injections into muscle, or by repeat injections every 4 days for 16 days, all animals regained their pretreatment response to painful stimulations, and there was no evidence of gross injury to tissue."( Ultra-long-duration local anesthesia produced by injection of lecithin-coated methoxyflurane microdroplets.
Haynes, DH; Kirkpatrick, AF, 1985
)
0.27
" Probit analysis of lethal dose-response curve data revealed that lidocaine, with or without epinephrine, was significantly more toxic intravenously than by internal carotid artery injection and that epinephrine potentiated the intravascular toxicity of lidocaine."( Intravascular lidocaine toxicity: influence of epinephrine and route of administration.
Yagiela, JA,
)
0.73
" A thorough understanding of the applied pharmacology, dosage recommendations, toxicity, and practical considerations must be attained before these drugs can be used effectively."( Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of drugs used to treat cardiac disease in horses.
McGuirk, SM; Muir, WW, 1985
)
0.27
"The literature reviewed herein clearly demonstrates the poor correlation between drug dosing and the ability to achieve a specific serum drug concentration and between drug dosing and clinical response, especially for drugs with a narrow therapeutic index."( Comparison of drug dosing methods.
Brater, DC; Burton, ME; Vasko, MR,
)
0.13
"Two middle aged female patients developed hallucinations and severe confusion with paranoid features during oral tocainide administration at recommended dosage levels."( Confusion and paranoia associated with oral tocainide.
Clarke, CW; el-Mahdi, EO, 1985
)
0.27
" The dosage of tocainide hydrochloride ranged from 200-600 mg daily."( A sequential double blind cross-over trial of tocainide hydrochloride in tinnitus.
Blayney, AW; Colman, BH; Guy, AM; Phillips, MS, 1985
)
0.27
" Its side effect profile appears to be similar in percentage to the adverse effects of quinidine, but often these side effects are milder, better tolerated, and respond to dosage alteration."( A review of the uses and limitations of tocainide--a class IB antiarrhythmic agent.
Horowitz, LN; Morganroth, J; Nestico, PF, 1985
)
0.27
" The findings are used to suggest a safe dosage regimen."( Pharmacokinetics of tocainide in patients with severe renal failure.
Braun, J; Engelmaier, F; Gessler, U; Gluth, WP; Sörgel, F, 1985
)
0.27
" Dose-response curves for lignocaine, mepivacaine, bupivacaine, amethocaine and cinchocaine were obtained after single intrathecal injection to the mouse."( A methodological study of spinal (subarachnoid) anaesthesia in the rat and the mouse.
Akerman, SB, 1985
)
0.27
"Lidocaine dosage recommendations vary widely."( Optimum dosage of lidocaine.
Arstila, M; Kanto, J; Laurikainen, E; Pekkarinen, A, 1985
)
2.05
" About 70 samples of various dosage forms and concentrations from four manufacturers were successfully analyzed by the method."( High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of d-/l-epinephrine enantiomer ratio in lidocaine-epinephrine local anesthetics.
Allgire, JF; Damo, CP; Juenge, EC; Kirchhoefer, RD; Sullivan, GM, 1985
)
0.49
" A computer-aided simulation generated from using the mean kinetic data in a 50-kg woman predicted that plasma lidocaine concentration would reach the postulated toxic range (approximately equal to 6 microgram/ml) after the fourth supplementary dose under a similar dosing scheme as performed in this study."( Plasma concentrations of lidocaine and its principal metabolites during intermittent epidural anesthesia.
Echizen, H; Inoue, R; Ishizaki, T; Kushida, K; Suganuma, T; Tomono, Y, 1985
)
0.78
" In these patients, after dosage adjustment, the mean lidocaine level did not rise, and all levels remained within the 2- to 4-mg/L therapeutic range at 24 hours."( Simple method for maintaining serum lidocaine levels in the therapeutic range.
Hurwitz, A; Wong, BY, 1985
)
0.79
"Nine healthy normal subjects received verapamil, 10 mg iv, before (control) and during cimetidine dosing (300 mg every 6 hours), and verapamil, 120 mg po, twice in the same manner."( Lack of interaction between verapamil and cimetidine.
Abernethy, DR; Schwartz, JB; Todd, EL, 1985
)
0.27
" This indicates that the rat is not a suitable model to study rectal lidocaine dosage forms."( First-pass elimination of lidocaine in the rabbit after peroral and rectal route of administration.
Alcorn, GJ; Denson, DD; Elconin, H; Ritschel, WA,
)
0.67
" The dose-response effectiveness for the prototype antiarrhythmic drugs, propranolol, quinidine and lidocaine in converting the induced ventricular fibrillation to sinus rhythm was determined."( A cardiac antiarrhythmic screening test using the isolated ischaemic perfused rat heart preparation.
Lee, AY; Mok, CP; Wong, TM; Zhan, CY, 1985
)
0.49
" Patient comfort, lignocaine dosage and resultant plasma concentrations were measured at four stages during the procedure."( Patient comfort and plasma lignocaine concentrations during fibreoptic bronchoscopy.
Nana, A; Santamaria, JD; Sutherland, AD, 1985
)
0.27
" Dose-response curves showed that lignocaine was more active in abolishing the ouabain induced arrhythmia than the halothane-adrenaline arrhythmia and was least active on the arrhythmia caused by ligation of the coronary artery."( Effects of lignocaine and propranolol on experimental cardiac arrhythmias.
Allen, JD; Shanks, RG; Zaidi, SA, 1971
)
0.25
" Special consideration, however, must be given with regard to drug selection and dosage in order to avoid adverse effects on the mother and fetus."( Antiarrhythmic drug therapy during pregnancy.
Elkayam, U; Frishman, W; Rotmensch, HH, 1983
)
0.27
" If side effects intervene that may cause continued therapy to be intolerable, changing the antiarrhythmic agent, as opposed to decreasing the dosage to an ineffective range, may be appropriate."( New directions in antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
Somberg, JC, 1984
)
0.27
" This study indicates the need for individual adaptation of lidocaine dosage in patients with myocardial infarction, especially where left ventricular function is impaired."( [Serum concentration measurements for the monitoring of anti-arrhythmic therapy with lidocaine].
Follath, F; Ganzinger, U; Heierli, B; Wenk, M, 1980
)
0.73
" The dose-response curves for each drug suggest that QX 752 and benzocaine each act on a single class of binding sites."( Local anesthetics QX 572 and benzocaine act at separate sites on the batrachotoxin-activated sodium channel.
Ehrenstein, G; Huang, LM, 1981
)
0.26
" Dose-response curves indicated that lidocaine blocks the channel by binding one-to-one, with a voltage-dependent K(d)."( Lidocaine block of cardiac sodium channels.
Bean, BP; Cohen, CJ; Tsien, RW, 1983
)
1.98
" The effect of d-TC and local anaesthetics on the dose-response relationship between ionophoretically applied L-glutamate and synaptic current suggested that both acted as non-competitive inhibitors."( Voltage-dependent drug blockade of L-glutamate activated channels of the crayfish.
Dekin, MS; Edwards, C, 1983
)
0.27
"Measurement of drug levels is becoming increasingly popular to optimise the dosage of various drugs."( Reliability of antiarrhythmic drug plasma concentration monitoring.
Follath, F; Ganzinger, U; Schuetz, E,
)
0.13
" These results suggest that in the dosage used in this study tocainide does not exert an antifibrillatory action in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction."( Prophylaxis of primary ventricular fibrillation with tocainide in acute myocardial infarction.
Campbell, RW; Elton, RA; Goodfellow, RM; Hutton, I; Taylor, E, 1983
)
0.27
" It is suggested that in the elderly, tocainide should be used in a lower dosage than normally recommended."( Nodal bradycardia induced by tocainide.
Datta, SK; Mandal, SK, 1983
)
0.27
" After evaluation of arrhythmias and treatment with intravenous lidocaine, oral tocainide dosage regimens were based on age, weight, and clinical status."( Tocainide kinetics in congestive heart failure.
Aronow, WS; Esterbrooks, D; Hee, TT; Hilleman, DE; Mohiuddin, SM; Mooss, AN; Patterson, AJ; Reich, JW; Sketch, MH, 1983
)
0.5
" Each patient then received a tocainide dosage schedule."( The appropriate dosage regime for the transition from intravenous lignocaine to oral tocainide after acute myocardial infarction.
Akhras, F; Emery, P; Holt, D; Jackson, G; Upward, JW, 1983
)
0.27
" In isolated right atria IQB-M-81 did not block the positive chronotropic and inotropic responses to isoprenaline but shifted the dose-response curve to the right."( Comparison of three beta-amino anilides: IQB-M-81, lidocaine and tocainide, on isolated rat atria.
Barrigón, S; Tamargo, J; Tejerina, T, 1983
)
0.52
" The results demonstrate that with the Bayesian forecasting technique, accurate assessment of individual dosage requirements can be obtained within a few hours after starting lignocaine therapy."( Rapid prediction of individual dosage requirements for lignocaine.
Berger, M; Follath, F; Ritz, R; Vozeh, S; Wenk, M,
)
0.13
" The dosage of lidocain was done according to the body-weight."( [Lidocaine elimination and dose adjustment in acute heart infarct and heart insufficiency].
Banditt, P; Kettner, W; Walther, H, 1984
)
1.18
" Such iatrogenic overdoses of lidocaine arise from confusion between prepackaged dosage forms."( Tissue distribution of lidocaine after fatal accidental injection.
Mackell, MA; Poklis, A; Tucker, EF, 1984
)
0.87
" Dose-response curves for electrophysiological and mechanical effects of the two drugs on spontaneously beating atria, electrically stimulated atria and papillary muscles isolated from rats were obtained."( Comparison of electrophysiological and mechanical effects of droxicainide and lidocaine on heart muscle isolated from rats.
Helgesen, KG; Kristiansen, O; Refsum, H, 1984
)
0.5
" Injection of a small dosage of lidocaine (4 mg/kg body weight) failed to produce any significant change in ABR wave III, AP and CM."( The effect of intravenous injection of lidocaine on the auditory system.
Suzuki, M, 1983
)
0.82
" Dosage adjustments were required in two CA patients v 33 CT patients."( Clinical studies with computer-assisted initial lidocaine therapy.
de Guzman, MF; Haywood, LJ; Jelliffe, RW; Kolb, E; Rodman, JH; Tuey, DB; Wagers, PW, 1984
)
0.52
" These results demonstrate that the blood concentrations of the three local anaesthetics following caudal administration are all below the toxic levels in spite of application of the maximum dosage recommended for adults."( Blood concentrations of lidocaine, mepivacaine and bupivacaine during caudal analgesia in children.
Takasaki, M, 1984
)
0.57
" To determine the effect of adjusted dosing of lidocaine in patients with myocardial infarction, we studied 32 patients receiving lidocaine either by a conventional method (control group: 1-2 mg/kg bolus, then 1 to 4 mg/min) or by an adjusted regimen based on the presence or absence of heart failure [experimental group: 1-2 mg/kg bolus; then, class I (no heart failure), 35 to 88 micrograms/kg/min; class II (heart failure), 12 to 35 micrograms/kg/min]."( Optimal lidocaine dosing in patients with myocardial infarction.
Lopez, LM; Mehta, JL; Roberts, RJ; Robinson, JD, 1982
)
0.96
" Contractility was examined in a randomized dose-response manner to both norepinephrine and the prostaglandin endoperoxide analog U-46619."( Vascular reactivity in endotoxin shock: effect of lidocaine or indomethacin pretreatment.
Casey, L; Fletcher, JR; Pomerantz, K; Ramwell, PW, 1982
)
0.52
" Tocainide dosage was 17."( Antiarrhythmic efficacy, pharmacokinetics and clinical safety of tocainide in convalescent myocardial infarction patients.
Klein, MD; Levine, PA; Ryan, TJ, 1980
)
0.26
" 3 On a dosage basis, encainide was seven times, lorcainide fourteen times and ORG 6001 twice as potent as lignocaine in raising VFT."( Antifibrillatory efficacy of encainide, loracainide and ORG 6001 compared with lignocaine in isolated hearts of rabbits and guinea-pigs.
Almotrefi, AA; Baker, JB, 1981
)
0.26
" Reducing the dosage to 100 mg/hr from the 12th hour onwards in II patients avoided this complication."( [Use of intramuscular lidocaine in the acute stage of myocardial infarction].
Bory, M; Bouyard, P; Bruguerolle, B; Djiane, P; Egre, A; Perchicot, B; Serradimigni, A, 1981
)
0.58
"-mass spectrometric analysis of urine extracts from rats dosed with tocainide (I) revealed the presence of cyclic compound identified as 3-(2,6-xylyl)-5-methylhydantoin (IV) derived from tocainide."( 3-(2,6-Xylyl)-5-methylhydantoin--a metabolite or a metabonate of tocainide in rats.
Axelson, JE; Venkataramanan, R, 1981
)
0.26
" Each compound was administered by intravenous single dose injection, dosage being 1 mg/kg for propranolol, 10 mg/kg for phenytoin, and 3,5 mg/kg for lidocain."( [Pharmacokinetics of propranolol, phenytoin and lidocaine in hypercholesterolemic rabbits].
Albin, H; Pehourcq, F; Ploux, D; Vinçon, G,
)
0.39
" Fifteen minutes after occlusion, the dogs were randomized into three groups: 9 dogs served as a control group, 10 were given lidocaine and 10 were given the same dosage of droxicainide."( Effects of lidocaine and droxicainide on myocardial necrosis: a comparative study.
Cheung, WM; Faria, DB; Maroko, PR; Ribeiro, LG, 1983
)
0.86
" There was a marked degree of absorption only in patients with thermal burns, in which case it depended on the surface area of the wound; although no toxic effects due to absorption were noted, caution in dosage is advisable."( Sterile topical lignocaine jelly in plastic surgery: an assessment of its systemic toxicity.
Bach, PH; Read, JM, 1980
)
0.26
" Thirty patients whose arrhythmia did not respond to correction of metabolic disturbances were randomly allocated to receive treatment either with lignocaine or with mexiletine in fixed dosage schedules (15 in each group)."( Mexiletine vs. lignocaine in the management of ventricular arrhythmias after open-heart surgery.
Bury, RW; Hale, G; Higginbotham, M; Mashford, ML; Zuidland, P, 1982
)
0.26
" Steady-state TCA plasma levels correlate well with tissue concentrations and permit adjustment of dosage to minimize the risk of iatrogenic poisoning."( Toxicity of tricyclic antidepressants--kinetics, mechanism, intervention: a review.
Irwin, HA; Preskorn, SH, 1982
)
0.26
" Dosage can be calculated on this basis for operations on the perineum, lower and groin with 97 to 98% confidence."( Caudal analgesia in children. Five hundred cases for procedures below the diaphragm.
McGown, RG, 1982
)
0.26
" As the dosage increased, the drug antiaggregative properties were enhanced accordingly."( [Effect of lidocaine on thrombocytic hemostasis].
Gorshkov, VA; Kirilenko, LL; Orlov, VN; Vasil'eva, EIu, 1982
)
0.65
" The reasons and mechanism for this difference between subjects on multiple dosing remains unclear."( Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine and its deethylated metabolite: dose and time dependency studies in man.
Aarons, LJ; Bending, MR; Bennett, PN; Rowland, M; Steiner, JA, 1982
)
0.59
"The dose-response curve of procaine or lignocaine (lidocaine) added to the St."( Protection of the myocardium during ischemic arrest. Dose-response curves for procaine and lignocaine in cardioplegic solutions.
Braimbridge, MV; Hearse, DJ; O'Brien, K, 1981
)
0.51
" It is concluded that local anaesthetic techniques using the amide-linked local anaesthetics administered in conventional dosage are safe to use in patients known to be genetically susceptible to malignant hyperthermia."( Response of mhs swine to i.v. infusion of lignocaine and bupivacaine.
Harrison, GG; Morrell, DF, 1980
)
0.26
"The dose-response and time-action parameters for the prototype antiarrhythmic drugs lidocaine, propranolol and quinidine were established using a cardiac antiarrhythmic screening procedure in the rat."( A cardiac antiarrhythmic screening test in the rat: the effects of lidocaine, propranolol and quinidine.
Baker, T; Erker, EF, 1980
)
0.72
" Lidoncaine, 5 x 10(-4) M, and MEGX, 2 x 10(-3) M, shifted the dose-response curve of NE to the right, whereas GX, 5 x 10(-4) M, shifted the curve to the left."( Modifications by lidocaine and its N-dealkylated metabolites of the response of the isolated rabbit aorta to transmural electrical stimulation.
Fukuda, S; Takeshita, H; Toda, N, 1980
)
0.6
" A subsequent study may now be performed to produce a valid, dose-response curve correlating perilymph lidocaine levels and cochlear responses."( Inner ear lidocaine concentrations following iontophoresis.
Gillespie, CA; Johnson, CM; Strom, CG; Swanson, GC, 1980
)
0.88
" The dosage was highly accurate with jet injection."( Gas-powered jet injection compared with conventional methods of injection using lignocaine and technetium-99m.
Bowcock, SA; Cooke, ED; Elliott, AT; Johnston, A, 1980
)
0.26
"The dosage and blood concentration of lidocaine required to produce central nervous and cardiovascular system toxicity in both nonasphyxiated and asphyxiated fetuses were determined in ten pregnant baboons with fetuses of average gestation of 158 days (term, 185 days)."( Toxicity and distribution of lidocaine in nonasphyxiated and asphyxiated baboon fetuses.
Covino, BG; Morishima, HO, 1981
)
0.82
" Lignocaine infusions in the dosage range of 20 to 40 micrograms."( The safety of continuous pleural lignocaine after thoracotomy in children and adolescents.
Balsara, RK; Lear, BR; Pasquariello, CA; Schwartz, RE; Stayer, SA, 1995
)
0.29
" Combining these observations with local anesthetic dosage considerations, the authors recommend that 2 percent lido-epi be used when performing mandibular block injections in young children."( Assessing the duration of mandibular soft tissue anesthesia.
Hermann, DG; Hersh, EV; Johnson, PD; Lamp, CJ; MacAfee, KA, 1995
)
0.29
"We have investigated the importance of cytochrome P-450IIIA enzyme activity in influencing dosage of the immunosuppressive drugs FK 506 and cyclosporine after liver transplantation."( Importance of cytochrome P-450IIIA activity in determining dosage and blood levels of FK 506 and cyclosporine in liver transplant recipients.
Cakaloglu, Y; Devlin, J; Tredger, JM; Williams, R, 1994
)
0.29
" Half of these animals in the dosage subgroup received a single injection at appliance placement and the other half received weekly injections."( The effects of exogenous prostaglandins on orthodontic tooth movement in rats.
Currier, GF; Howes, RI; Leiker, BJ; Nanda, RS; Sinha, PK, 1995
)
0.29
"Ligenten gel is a combined dosage form containing gentamicin (a broad spectrum antibiotic), lidocaine (an anesthetic) and ethonium (an antiseptic)."( [Ligenten--a combination drug with anesthetic and antibacterial action for local use in urology and gynecology].
Darenkov, AF; Kotliarova, GA; Lebed', SV; Makarov, OV; Perepanova, TS; Savchenko, TN; Strachunskiĭ, LS; Tsibina, LV; Vasil'ev, MM; Zharov, EV, 1994
)
0.51
" The aim of this study was to verify whether this action resulted from a local anaesthetic effect of pethidine or from inadequate fentanyl dosage in previous studies."( The effects of pethidine, fentanyl and lignocaine on postanaesthetic shivering.
Alfonsi, P; Chauvin, M; Hongnat, JM; Lebrault, C, 1995
)
0.29
" This is particularly true in those patients in whom an adequate dosage of parenteral medication is contraindicated or unsafe."( Hematoma block for ankle fractures: a safe and efficacious technique for manipulations.
Alioto, RJ; Furia, JP; Marquardt, JD, 1995
)
0.29
" Dose-response relations were also consistent with independent binding of transcainide to two separate sites on the channel."( Transcainide causes two modes of open-channel block with different voltage sensitivities in batrachotoxin-activated sodium channels.
French, RJ; Zamponi, GW, 1994
)
0.29
" A dosage of 50 mg of lidocaine spray was administered to the genital mucosa of the inside of the labiae minora."( Onset and duration of hypoalgesia following application of lidocaine spray on genital mucosa.
Arendt-Nielsen, L; Bjerring, P; Laursen, JK; Schønemann, NK; van der Burght, M, 1994
)
0.85
" Maximal changes of these parameters were comparable in the three epidural dosage groups but were more prolonged with increasing dose."( Effects of epidural anesthesia on splanchnic capacitance.
Hogan, QH; Kampine, JP; Stadnicka, A, 1994
)
0.29
" Lid shifted the dose-response curves for KCl and NA to the right nonparallelly and depressed their maximal responses."( [Effects of lidocaine on contraction of isolated rabbit aortic rings].
Bu, X; Jiang, MZ; Li, ST; Wen, Y; Zhang, ZH, 1994
)
0.67
" Complete simultaneous facial analgesia (CSFA) was accomplished in an average of 15 minutes and the recommended dosage of lidocaine was exceeded by a mean of 52."( Safe dosages of lidocaine for facial analgesia.
Bonanno, PC, 1994
)
0.84
"This paper presents a general stochastic control framework for determining drug dosage regimens where the sample times, dosing times, desired goals, etc."( Design of dosage regimens: a multiple model stochastic control approach.
Bayard, DS; Milman, MH; Schumitzky, A, 1994
)
0.29
" A tetracaine dose-response curve for HVA-ICa indicated an apparent dissociation constant of 79."( Local anesthetics depress the calcium current of rat sensory neurons in culture.
Muteki, T; Sugiyama, K, 1994
)
0.29
" Dose-response relations on the sodium and calcium currents and effects on the availability relation for sodium current were examined."( Effects of lidocaine on rat myometrial sodium channels and implications for the management of preterm labor.
Kao, CY; Wang, S, 1994
)
0.68
" Regional extension of anaesthesia was comparable after dosing with xylazine and lidocaine (tail, after, vulva and perineum)."( [Experiences with the use of xylazine for sacral epidural anesthesia in cattle].
Kehler, W; Rehage, J; Scholz, H, 1994
)
0.51
" Microinjections of medetomidine into the cerebellum or the PAG produced an identical dose-response curve in the tail-flick test as that obtained following microinjection into the RVM."( The rostroventromedial medulla is not involved in alpha 2-adrenoceptor-mediated antinociception in the rat.
Hämäläinen, MM; Pertovaara, A, 1993
)
0.29
" Dose-response curves were plotted for each drug."( Duration of spinal anaesthesia is determined by the partition coefficient of local anaesthetic.
Benita, S; Golomb, E; Grant, GJ; Langerman, L, 1994
)
0.29
" Controlled studies should be performed to prove efficacy, determine optimal TPLA formulation, and define dosage limits."( Treatment of the cutaneous pain of acute herpes zoster with 9% lidocaine (base) in petrolatum/paraffin ointment.
Cork, RC; Dunston, A; Eyrich, J; Heitler, D; Johnson, W; Lopez-Anaya, A; Naraghi, M; Ragan, A; Riopelle, AJ; Riopelle, J, 1994
)
0.53
" From these findings, the present Bayesian method implemented with the estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters in a Swiss patient population is useful for sufficiently accurate and precise assessment of individual dosage requirement within a few hours after starting lidocaine therapy."( A prospective study for validation of Bayesian prediction approach to adjust individual lidocaine dosage.
Hirayama, H; Kosuge, K; Nakashima, M; Uematsu, T; Umemura, K, 1994
)
0.69
" In 112 patients, the mean lidocaine dosage was 33."( Tumescent technique for local anesthesia improves safety in large-volume liposuction.
Klein, JA, 1993
)
0.58
"Factors that influence recommended dosage guidelines for intramuscularly and subcutaneously injected drugs include a spectrum of variables, including therapeutic objective(s), the drug's therapeutic index, the inclusion of concomitant vasoconstrictors, and so on."( Regional blood flow as a determinant of drug absorption description of an animal model.
Karatassas, A; Morris, RG; Orfanos, A, 1993
)
0.29
" Such procedures are undertaken using single infiltration dosage recommendations for lignocaine, both with and without adrenaline."( The relationship between regional blood flow and absorption of lignocaine.
Karatassas, A; Morris, RG; Slavotinek, AH, 1993
)
0.29
" Model parameters were estimated separately for dosing (4 h current-on) and washout (4 h current-off) periods in experiments with coadministered vasoactive drugs [tolazoline (vasodilator) and norepinephrine (vasoconstrictor)] and controls (lidocaine alone)."( Model describing transdermal iontophoretic delivery of lidocaine incorporating consideration of cutaneous microvascular state.
Riviere, JE; Williams, PL, 1993
)
0.72
" Lidocaine produced a biphasic dose-response curve, with contraction at low concentrations (1."( Effects of lidocaine and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) on isolated human radial arteries.
Jernbeck, J; Samuelson, UE, 1993
)
1.59
" Ultrasonically nebulized hypertonic saline challenge was given in a dose-response manner to determine the provocative dose of hypertonic saline-laden air required to produce a fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 20% or greater (PD20HS)."( The contribution of neurogenic reflexes to hypertonic saline-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma.
Holgate, ST; Makker, HK, 1993
)
0.29
" The dose-response relationship for lidocaine block at a low frequency (0."( Characteristics of lidocaine block of sodium channels in single human atrial cells.
Arentzen, C; Backer, C; Eager, S; Furukawa, T; Jia, H; Sakakibara, Y; Singer, DH; Wasserstrom, JA, 1993
)
0.89
" It cannot replace the need for analgesic sedation but it can be used advantageously to reduce the dosage of analgesic and sedative drugs during ESWL treatments performed without regional or general anesthesia in the unmodified Dornier HM3 lithotriptor."( Cutaneous anesthesia with lidocaine-prilocaine cream: a useful adjunct during shock wave lithotripsy with analgesic sedation.
Tiselius, HG, 1993
)
0.59
" The dosage of amitriptyline (initiated at 10 mg, gradually increased to 40-60 mg daily) was not sufficient to treat depression, but was in the range effective for other cutaneous dysesthesias."( Dysesthetic ("essential") vulvodynia. Treatment with amitriptyline.
McKay, M, 1993
)
0.29
" A dosage of 1 mg/kg body weight was diluted with 20% glucose (20 ml) and administered intravenously over a one-min period."( Changes in auditory evoked responses during intravenous lidocaine.
Aso, S; Mizukoshi, K; Ueda, S; Watanabe, Y, 1993
)
0.53
" R56865 was given before ischemia and with the onset of reperfusion, applying different dosing schedules, including an initial loading dose."( R56865 is antifibrillatory in reperfused ischemic guinea-pig hearts, even when given only during reperfusion.
Guttmann, I; Mozes, A; Scheufler, E; Wilffert, B, 1995
)
0.29
"Significant impairment of BCG viability, dependent on dosage and time of co-incubation, was noted with all lubricants analyzed."( The effect of lubricants on viability of bacillus Calmette-Guerin for intravesical immunotherapy against bladder carcinoma.
Böhle, A; Braasch, H; Jocham, D; Rüsch-Gerdes, S; Ulmer, AJ, 1996
)
0.29
" Fifteen epidural initially were dosed with bupivicaine (1 to 2 mg/kg) alone or in combination with fentanyl (1 to 2 micrograms/kg)."( Continuous thoracic epidural infusions for postoperative analgesia after pectus deformity repair.
Abajian, JC; Dicker, R; McBride, WJ; Vane, DW, 1996
)
0.29
"The safety of lidocaine dosing in the tumescent technique has been well documented, but there is little evidence regarding the safety of combining tumescent lidocaine infiltration with subcutaneous lidocaine infiltration required in other aesthetic surgery."( Lidocaine and epinephrine levels in tumescent technique liposuction.
Burk, RW; Guzman-Stein, G; Vasconez, LO, 1996
)
2.1
"This study was performed in order to determine concentration-effect, and graded and quantal dose-response relationships for the clinical administration of intravenous (IV) lidocaine to patients with neuropathic pain."( The analgesic response to intravenous lidocaine in the treatment of neuropathic pain.
Arthur, GR; Cherukuri, S; Ferrante, FM; Paggioli, J, 1996
)
0.76
" Extent of block to cold and pinprick was similar in both dosage groups (median T4), as was the rate of block onset."( Pharmacodynamics of subarachnoid hyperbaric 5% lignocaine.
Chan, SS; Jones, RD; Rushmer, J, 1996
)
0.29
" Nonetheless, GHB plasma concentrations fell to either undetectable or negligible levels by the end of the usual dosing intervals (6-8 h)."( Effect of moderate or severe liver dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid.
Ferrara, SD; Frison, G; Mazzo, M; Orlando, R; Padrini, R; Palatini, P; Tedeschi, L; Zordan, R, 1996
)
0.29
" The exploratory studies on the optimal dosage of lidocaine in the surgery under laryngomicroscope was performed in 22 patients."( Safe and effective topical application dose of lidocaine for surgery with laryngomicroscopy.
Iga, T; Ito, K; Kaga, K; Kotaki, H; Mitomi, N; Sawada, Y; Tayama, N; Tezuka, K, 1996
)
0.8
"The safe upper limit of lidocaine dosage in tumescent anesthesia for liposuction has been reported to be 35 mg/kg."( Tumescent anesthesia with a lidocaine dose of 55 mg/kg is safe for liposuction.
Kageyama, N; Moy, RL; Ostad, A, 1996
)
0.89
" There was no difference in decay or recovery of plantar flexion motor power data between dosage groups in the sitting position."( Motor power pharmacodynamics of subarachnoid hyperbaric 5% lidocaine in the sitting position.
Chan, SS; Cheung, CK; Ho, JY; Jones, RD; Miles, W; Rushmer, J, 1997
)
0.54
"This study was designed to determine and compare the dose-response characteristics, speed of onset, and relative potency of single-dose epidural fentanyl (F) and sufentanil (S) for postoperative pain relief."( A randomized, double-blind, dose-response comparison of epidural fentanyl versus sufentanil analgesia after cesarean section.
Grass, JA; Harris, AP; Michitsch, R; Sakima, NT; Schmidt, R; Zuckerman, RL, 1997
)
0.3
" The dosage of local anesthetic used (0."( The effects of local anesthetic containing adrenaline on gingival blood flow in smokers and non-smokers.
Hirsch, RS; Ketabi, M, 1997
)
0.3
"After evaluating the extension and pattern of sensory blockade in high, mid, and low thoracic epidural analgesia, the authors suggest that it is safe to use similar dosage regimens in all three regions, and that in high thoracic epidural analgesia, it is important to insert the epidural catheter at the level of the intended cranial border of blockade."( Extension of sensory blockade after thoracic epidural administration of a test dose of lidocaine at three different levels.
Gielen, MJ; Liem, TH; van Egmond, J; Visser, WA, 1998
)
0.52
" Results showed a significantly improved skin perfusion in the lidocaine-treated group in a dose-response fashion as compared to control animals."( Local anesthetics improve dermal perfusion after burn injury.
Brofeldt, BT; Cassuto, J; Jönsson, A; Nellgård, P; Tarnow, P,
)
0.37
" However, smaller doses provided less effective pain relief, and a linear dose-response relationship was demonstrated."( The dose-response relationship of ketorolac as a component of intravenous regional anesthesia with lidocaine.
Gardner, G; Reuben, SS; Steinberg, RB, 1998
)
0.52
" Of the 30 patients (15 in each group) who received 30 mg initially, 25 required repeat lidocaine dosing through the catheter during surgery."( A comparative study of low-dose hyperbaric spinal lidocaine 0.5% versus 5% for continuous spinal anesthesia.
Al-Kaisy, A; Chan, VW; Drasner, K; Garcia, J,
)
0.61
"h-1) doses of lidocaine on defibrillation energy requirements (DER) to relate changes in indexes of sodium-channel blockade with changes in DER values using a dose-response study design."( High-dose lidocaine does not affect defibrillation efficacy: implications for defibrillation mechanisms.
Miller, AW; Sims, JJ; Ujhelyi, MR, 1998
)
1.06
" The mean dosage of lidocaine (0."( Local anesthesia for above knee femoropopliteal bypass: an alternative technique to endoluminal bypass grafting.
Lumsden, AB; MacDonald, MJ; Ofenloch, JC; Pitts, M; Surowiec, SM; Weiss, V, 1998
)
0.62
" The failure rate, sensory and motor blockade, success rate by changing to lidocaine and its dosage were recorded."( Clinical study of failure in continuous spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine.
Kung, CC; Lin, SY; Sun, WZ; Tang, CS; Wu, TJ, 1998
)
0.53
" Physicians must adhere to recommendations to avoid mucous membrane contact and ensure appropriate dosing with these agents."( Topical anesthesia.
Keyes, PD; Rizos, J; Tallon, JM, 1998
)
0.3
"The pharmacokinetic behaviour of oxytetracycline (OTC) was studied in 11 sheep after intravenous and intramuscular administration at a single dosage of 20 mg kg(-1) bodyweight."( Pharmacokinetics of oxytetracycline after intramuscular administration with lidocaine in sheep, comparison with a conventional formulation.
Carceles, CM; Guimerá, ME; Moreno, L; Serrano, JM,
)
0.36
"Etoposide dosage in patients with liver dysfunction remains controversial."( Pharmacokinetics of oral etoposide in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Aita, P; Boiocchi, M; Cannizzaro, R; Colussi, AM; Corona, G; Robieux, I; Sorio, R; Toffoli, G; Tumolo, S, 1999
)
0.3
" The least decrease of BP and minimal need of rescue ephedrine among all patients studied were recorded in the group receiving low dosage of lidocaine with intrathecal clonidine (L40-C100)."( Enhancement of intrathecal lidocaine by addition of local and systemic clonidine.
Dobrydnjov, I; Samarütel, J, 1999
)
0.8
"Data abstracted from each report included gestational age at birth, timing and dosage regimen of EMLA, control group treatment and outcomes."( Lidocaine-prilocaine cream for analgesia during circumcision in newborn boys.
Ohlsson, A; Ohlsson, K; Taddio, A, 2000
)
1.75
" The contralateral side was injected with the same dosage of the toxin, reconstituted in an equal volume of saline, to serve as control."( Addition of an anesthetic agent to enhance the predictability of the effects of botulinum toxin type A injections: a randomized controlled study.
Gassner, HG; Sherris, DA, 2000
)
0.31
" For this purpose, we plotted a dose-response curve for adrenaline by calculating the arrhythmic ratio, which is the number of ventricular ectopic beats induced by adrenaline divided by the total heart rate, and observed the changes in the arrhythmic ratio-adrenaline dose relation before and after administration of class I drugs."( QT-prolonging class I drug, disopyramide, does not aggravate but suppresses adrenaline-induced arrhythmias. Comparison with cibenzoline and pilsicainide.
Aye, NN; Hashimoto, K; Miyamoto, S; Teramatsu, T; Zhu, B, 2000
)
0.31
" The dosage of lignocaine used in various studies ranges from 50 mg to 200 mg."( Comparison of two different doses of lignocaine used in paracervical block during oocyte collection in an IVF programme.
Chui, DK; Ho, PC; Ng, EH; Tang, OS, 2000
)
0.31
" The intrathecal morphine antinociceptive dose-response curve (DRC) in morphine-pelleted rats was displaced to the right of that in placebo-pelleted rats, indicating antinociceptive "tolerance."( Tonic descending facilitation from the rostral ventromedial medulla mediates opioid-induced abnormal pain and antinociceptive tolerance.
Lai, J; Malan, TP; Ossipov, MH; Porreca, F; Suenaga, NM; Vanderah, TW, 2001
)
0.31
"This study was carried out to determine the maximum and safe dosage of lidocaine administered in tumescent liposuction."( [Monitoring of serum lidocaine concentration in tumescent liposuction infiltrated with high-dosage lidocaine and its clinical significance].
He, Q; Lin, Z; Zhu, X, 1999
)
0.86
"1 mg/ml mixed with 1/1,000,000 to 1/2,000,000 epinephrine, could be administered with a dosage of 35 mg/kg body weight as a local infiltration anesthetic while the serum lidocaine was still within the safety limit and no signs of intoxication manifested."( [Monitoring of serum lidocaine concentration in tumescent liposuction infiltrated with high-dosage lidocaine and its clinical significance].
He, Q; Lin, Z; Zhu, X, 1999
)
0.82
" This study investigates the dose-response effect of adrenaline added to lignocaine on postoperative pain, when used as local anaesthetic for oral soft tissue surgery."( A dose-response study of adrenaline combined with lignocaine 2%: effect on acute postoperative pain after oral soft tissue surgery.
Jorkjend, L; Skoglund, LA, 2001
)
0.31
"Appropriate dosing of pilsicainide hydrochloride, an anti-arrhythmic drug excreted via the kidney, was investigated in patients on dialysis."( Appropriate dosing of pilsicainide hydrochloride in patients on hemodialysis.
Fujii, Z; Fujimoto, K; Kawata, Y; Matsumoto, M; Matsuzaki, M; Minami, M; Nawata, C; Sakumura, T, 2001
)
0.31
" Success rates were 28% for the 8 mg/kg dosage and 44% for the 10 mg/kg dosage."( A comparison of two oral ketamine-diazepam regimens for the sedation of anxious pediatric dental patients.
Sullivan, DC; Webb, MD; Wilson, CF,
)
0.13
" The 2Lid-1/8 group indicated adequate anesthetic potency with the smallest dosage at all observation periods."( Comparative study on anesthetic potency depending on concentrations of lidocaine and epinephrine: assessment of dental local anesthetics using the jaw-opening reflex.
Ichinohe, T; Kaneko, Y; Ohkado, S, 2001
)
0.54
" Within the first 10 hrs after baseline measurements, the dosage was increased until no further increase in the left ventricular stroke work index occurred."( Enoximone in contrast to dobutamine improves hepatosplanchnic function in fluid-optimized septic shock patients.
Kaulfuss, M; Kern, H; Kox, WJ; Martin, M; Schröder, T; Spies, CD, 2001
)
0.31
" In conclusion, dosage modification is necessary in hypercholesterolemia."( [The effect of hyperlipidemia on metabolism, distribution and secretion of lidocaine in patients with primary hyperlipidemia].
Rózański, J, 2000
)
0.54
" We assessed the dose-response relationship of clonidine added to lidocaine in peribulbar block."( A dose response study of clonidine with local anesthetic mixture for peribulbar block: a comparison of three doses.
Bharti, N; Kaul, HL; Khokhar, SK; Madan, R; Shende, D, 2001
)
0.55
"We examined the penetration rate of lidocaine (LC) through excised oral mucosa from hamster cheek pouch and the in vitro release rate of LC from film dosage forms with hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC) as a film base."( Development of polymer film dosage forms of lidocaine for buccal administration. I. Penetration rate and release rate.
Danjo, K; Iida, K; Okamoto, H; Taguchi, H, 2001
)
0.85
" The ED50 for hypnosis and the LD50 were determined for each drug separately, and a dose-response curve was prepared for each drug, using combinations of propofol-lidocane and ketamine-lidocaine at three different dose ratios."( Changes in effective and lethal doses of intravenous anesthetics and lidocaine when used in combination in mice.
Barak, M; Ben-Shlomo, I; Katz, Y, 2001
)
0.74
" It was concluded that articaine showed quicker onset than lidocaine and propitocaine and that there was a need to increase the dosage to attain a quick onset or to extend the duration."( Comparative study on anesthetic potency of dental local anesthetics assessed by the jaw-opening reflex in rabbits.
Aida, H; Kaneko, Y; Miyoshi, T, 2000
)
0.55
" In practice, argatroban coadministered with these frequently prescribed drugs should require no dosage adjustments."( Investigation of the interaction between argatroban and acetaminophen, lidocaine, or digoxin.
DiCicco, RA; Graham, AM; Hursting, MJ; Inglis, AM; Sheth, SB; Tenero, DM, 2002
)
0.55
"In a consecutive series of 23 patients with anterior urethral stricture, a dosage of 3 mL of 1% lidocaine was slowly injected into the glans penis."( Optical urethrotomy for anterior urethral stricture under a new local anesthesia: intracorpus spongiosum anesthesia.
Rong-gui, Z; Ye, G, 2002
)
0.53
" Subsequently 80 patients were treated in a random, placebo-controlled, dose-response study of collagenase at 2 test centers."( Collagen as a clinical target: nonoperative treatment of Dupuytren's disease.
Badalamente, MA; Hentz, VR; Hurst, LC, 2002
)
0.31
"In previous studies, we prepared film dosage forms of lidocaine (LC) with hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC) as a film base using the solvent evaporation (SE) method."( Development of polymer film dosage forms of lidocaine for buccal administration: II. Comparison of preparation methods.
Arakawa, Y; Danjo, K; Iida, K; Nakamori, T; Okamoto, H, 2002
)
0.82
" One-hundred and thirty-two patients were randomly assigned to one of the six groups according to concentration and dosage of lidocaine administered at the time of the initiation of propofol infusion."( [Effects of concentration and dosage of lidocaine on preventing the pain on injection of propofol].
Adachi, H; Harada, T; Hirosawa, J; Inagaki, Y; Ishibe, Y; Otsuki, A; Tsubokura, H, 2002
)
0.79
" with the labeled dosage (12 hr/day)."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of continuously applied lidocaine patches 5%.
Alvarez, NA; Galer, BS; Gammaitoni, AR, 2002
)
0.57
" Our results indicate that stress can alter lidocaine levels in plasma and tissues, suggesting that stress should be considered an important factor when determining the dosage of lidocaine in clinical application."( Stress-induced lidocaine modification in serum and tissues.
Mourouzis, C; Potamianou, A; Saranteas, T; Tesseromatis, C; Varonos, D,
)
0.75
" Increasing the dosage either terminated AF (6 preparations) or converted to organized activity (ie, atypical atrial flutter) (4 preparations)."( Widening of the excitable gap and enlargement of the core of reentry during atrial fibrillation with a pure sodium channel blocker in canine atria.
Ashihara, T; Hirai, H; Ikeda, T; Kawase, A; Kubota, T; Nakazawa, K; Namba, T; Sugi, K, 2003
)
0.32
"Intraarterial administration of lidocaine before and during chemoembolization is a safe and effective method for preventing or reducing peri- and post-procedural pain and dosage of narcotic analgesics in patients with HCC."( Chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: effect of intraarterial lidocaine in peri- and post-procedural pain and hospitalization.
Giojelli, A; Romano, M; Salvatore, M; Tamburrini, O, 2003
)
0.83
" The mean dosage and the total amount of Pethidine at 24 hours were significantly lower in G2 compared with G1."( Postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised prospective double-blind clinical trial.
Goroshina, J; Lepner, U; Samarütel, J, 2003
)
0.32
" In a separate series of experiments in which normal ventricular tissue was electrically stimulated, 2 micro mol kg(-1) min(-1) lidocaine produced a leftward shift in the dose-response curve for tedisamil's effect on effective refractory period (P<0."( Tedisamil and lidocaine enhance each other's antiarrhythmic activity against ischaemia-induced arrhythmias in rats.
Barrett, TD; Sarraf, G; Walker, MJ, 2003
)
0.89
" Evaluation of the dose-response relationship showed that a maximal effect was attained with a concentration of 4% lidocaine."( Vestibulo-oculomotor behaviour in rats following a transient unilateral vestibular loss induced by lidocaine.
Magnusson, AK; Tham, R, 2003
)
0.75
"5 mg kg(-1) at 15 min after induction of anaesthesia directly followed by a maintenance dosage of 50 microg kg(-1) min(-1), while the control group received saline (i."( Effects of intravenous lidocaine on isoflurane concentration, physiological parameters, metabolic parameters and stress-related hormones in horses undergoing surgery.
Dzikiti, TB; Hellebrekers, LJ; van Dijk, P, 2003
)
0.63
"The adjustment of local anesthetic dosage for peripheral nerve block must meet two basic requirements: a drug concentration sufficient to inhibit Na+ channels to the point of impulse failure and a volume of drug sufficient to expose a length of nerve longer than the "critical length" for propagation failure."( The critical role of concentration for lidocaine block of peripheral nerve in vivo: studies of function and drug uptake in the rat.
Birknes, J; Nakamura, T; Popitz-Bergez, F; Strichartz, GR, 2003
)
0.59
" We examined the safety, dose-response characteristics, and effects of epinephrine with spinal 2-CP."( Spinal 2-chloroprocaine: a dose-ranging study and the effect of added epinephrine.
Kopacz, DJ; McDonald, SB; Smith, KN, 2004
)
0.32
" After the neurolytic block, the total dosage of morphine and diclofenac remained unchanged for 2 months."( Application of a mandibular nerve block using an indwelling catheter for intractable cancer pain.
Kohase, H; Shibaji, T; Suzuki, N; Umino, M, 2004
)
0.32
" Dosage had no significant effect."( Role of histamine release in nonspecific vasodilatation during anodal and cathodal iontophoresis.
Droog, EJ; Henricson, J; Horiuchi, Y; Lennquist, S; Sjöberg, F; Wikström, T, 2004
)
0.32
" Injury to the thumb required a higher dosage (3 ml subcutaneously), and only offered sufficient pain relief for palmar injuries."( [Clinical experiences and dosage pattern in subcutaneous single-injection digital block technique].
Genelin, F; Gradl, G; Kollersbeck, C; Walcher, T, 2004
)
0.32
"Although prokinetics are commonly used for management of POI in horses there is clearly a need for more controlled studies to define efficacious dosing and a need to develop new prokinetic drugs."( Survey of prokinetic use in horses with gastrointestinal injury.
Harmon, FA; Nieto, JE; Snyder, JR; Van Hoogmoed, LM,
)
0.13
" 3 Dose-response curves for both channels had different EC50 (dose producing 50% maximum current inhibition) (450 microm for Nav1."( Differential modulation of Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 peripheral nerve sodium channels by the local anesthetic lidocaine.
Chahine, M; Chevrier, P; Vijayaragavan, K, 2004
)
0.54
" However, it is not known what plasma levels are obtained when the same dosage is used in children."( Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine delivered from a transmucosal patch in children.
Leopold, A; Moursi, AM; Weaver, JS; Wilson, S, 2002
)
0.64
" The clinical implication of this study is that no lidocaine dosage adjustments are necessary if it is used to prepare the airway prior to endoscopic procedures or intubation in patients using itraconazole or other inhibitors of CYP3A4."( Effect of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of inhaled lidocaine.
Isohanni, MH; Neuvonen, PJ; Olkkola, KT, 2004
)
0.82
"5 mg/kg of the study drug was injected and this dosage was added to the total amount."( The postoperative analgesic effect of tramadol when used as subcutaneous local anesthetic.
Altunkaya, H; Babuccu, O; Demirel, CB; Hosnuter, M; Kargi, E; Ozer, Y; Ozkocak, I, 2004
)
0.32
" It seems that the 5 mg dosage works better than the lower one."( Supplementing epidural lidocaine with midazolam: effect on sensorymotor block level.
Islami, M; Sajedi, P, 2004
)
0.63
" Plasma concentrations of free (unbound) and total valdecoxib and its active hydroxylated metabolite (SC-66905) were measured following single and multiple dosing (day 1 and day 8)."( The effect of mild and moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of valdecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor.
Britto, MR; Mainka, MB; Parivar, K; Sarapa, N, 2005
)
0.33
" The adjustment of valdecoxib dose or dosing regimen does not appear mandatory in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment, although caution is necessary during treatment of these patients with valdecoxib."( The effect of mild and moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of valdecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor.
Britto, MR; Mainka, MB; Parivar, K; Sarapa, N, 2005
)
0.33
"Anesthesia has an influence on the disposition of lidocaine in horses, and a change in dosing during anesthesia should be considered."( Influence of general anesthesia on pharmacokinetics of intravenous lidocaine infusion in horses.
Feary, DJ; Mama, KR; Thomasy, S; Wagner, AE, 2005
)
0.82
"A dosage of 3 mL of 1% lidocaine was slowly injected into the glans penis of 51 male patients."( Use of a new local anesthesia--intracorpus spongiosum anesthesia--in procedures on anterior urethra.
Hua-Qi, Y; Rong-Gui, Z; Shan-Hong, Y; Xiang-Wei, W; Ye, G, 2005
)
0.64
" In groups 6 and 7, additional fentanyl doses were lower than in the other groups, but only in group 7 was the total fentanyl dosage low."( Effectiveness of eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cream and occlusive dressing with low dosage of fentanyl for pain control during shockwave lithotripsy.
Basar, H; Basar, MM; Batislam, E; Ozcan, S; Tuglu, D; Yilmaz, E, 2005
)
0.33
" The employment of methotrexate attained decrease in the dosage of steroids temporarily."( [Treatment with nebulized lidocaine in steroid-dependent asthma].
de Paz Arranz, S; Fernández Parra, B; Herrera Mozo, I; Pérez Pimiento, A; Rodríguez Mosquera, M; Santaolalla Montoya, M,
)
0.43
" Also there was achieved a parallel analysis of buthylhydroxyanisol, as a preservative, and hydroquinone, as a degradation product of calcium dobesilate, present in these dosage forms."( Validation of liquid chromatographic method for analysis of lidocaine hydrochloride, dexamethasone acetate, calcium dobesilate, buthylhydroxyanisol and degradation product hydroquinone in suppositories and ointment.
Ivanovic, I; Markovic, S; Petrovic, S; Zecevic, M; Zivanovic, Lj, 2005
)
0.57
", lidocaine and ketoprofen) from mucoadhesive buccal film dosage forms."( Effect of low-molecular-weight beta-cyclodextrin polymer on release of drugs from mucoadhesive buccal film dosage forms.
Arakawa, Y; Hashida, M; Kawakami, S; Yamashita, F, 2005
)
1.05
" The dosage required for peripheral nerve blockade in humans would cause unacceptable cardiovascular side effects."( Efficacy of lidocaine or bupivacaine combined with ephedrine in rat sciatic nerve block.
Gerner, P; Greco, WR; Hung, YC; Kau, YC; Wang, GK; Zizza, AM; Zurakowski, D,
)
0.51
" Furthermore, the cardiovascular side effects will limit the maximal tolerable dosage of ephedrine."( Efficacy of lidocaine or bupivacaine combined with ephedrine in rat sciatic nerve block.
Gerner, P; Greco, WR; Hung, YC; Kau, YC; Wang, GK; Zizza, AM; Zurakowski, D,
)
0.51
"Availability of pharmacokinetic data for horses with gastrointestinal tract disease will facilitate appropriate clinical dosing of lidocaine."( Influence of gastrointestinal tract disease on pharmacokinetics of lidocaine after intravenous infusion in anesthetized horses.
Enns, RM; Feary, DJ; Mama, KR; Thomasy, SM; Wagner, AE, 2006
)
0.77
"To determine the dose-response effect and safety of IV lidocaine at different dose infusion rates on spontaneous ongoing neuropathic pain."( A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled pilot trial of extended IV lidocaine infusion for relief of ongoing neuropathic pain.
Backonja, MM; Hutson, PR; Tremont-Lukats, IW,
)
0.61
" Inadequate dosing and later administration of amiodarone in the code were two confounding factors in this study."( Comparing intravenous amiodarone or lidocaine, or both, outcomes for inpatients with pulseless ventricular arrhythmias.
Henderson, SO; Idrees, U; Kane-Gill, SL; Kirisci, L; Ou, NN; Oyen, LJ; Rea, RS; Rudis, MI; Seybert, AL; Stauss, JL, 2006
)
0.61
" Dosing and administration of topical agents in the treatment of primary herpetic gingivostomatitis in preschoolers were problematic."( Management of primary herpetic gingivostomatitis in young children.
Faden, H, 2006
)
0.33
" The aim of this study was to develop an optimal dosing strategy with minimal risk of cardiac arrhythmias."( Development of an optimal lidocaine infusion strategy for neonatal seizures.
de Vries, LS; Malingré, MM; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van Kesteren, C; Van Rooij, LG; Ververs, TF, 2006
)
0.63
" Secondly, we developed the optimal dosing regimen, which was defined as an infusion regimen at which maximal lidocaine plasma concentrations are <9 mg/L."( Development of an optimal lidocaine infusion strategy for neonatal seizures.
de Vries, LS; Malingré, MM; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van Kesteren, C; Van Rooij, LG; Ververs, TF, 2006
)
0.85
"A new lidocaine dosing schedule was developed."( Development of an optimal lidocaine infusion strategy for neonatal seizures.
de Vries, LS; Malingré, MM; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van Kesteren, C; Van Rooij, LG; Ververs, TF, 2006
)
1.11
" This article will help nurses to understand the use of drugs in cardiac arrest resuscitation, explaining the rationale for their use, the dosage and any significant problems likely to be encountered."( Understanding the drugs used during cardiac arrest response.
Gallimore, D,
)
0.13
"To determine the effectiveness and safety, in an emergency medical services setting, of intermittent bolus dosing of lidocaine versus a bolus followed by a drip."( Intermittent bolus dosing of lidocaine in emergency medical services-an alternative to bolus followed by a drip.
Daya, MR; Fujisaki, B; Kim, S; Millin, MG; Schmidt, TA,
)
0.63
"Intermittent bolus dosing protocol was associated with an equivalent effectiveness in maintaining rhythms of nonventricular origin without an increase in complications."( Intermittent bolus dosing of lidocaine in emergency medical services-an alternative to bolus followed by a drip.
Daya, MR; Fujisaki, B; Kim, S; Millin, MG; Schmidt, TA,
)
0.42
" When dosed appropriately in the clinical setting, one bolus of IV procainamide was safe for the treatment of postoperative ventricular arrhythmias."( Comparison of acute hemodynamic effects of lidocaine and procainamide for postoperative ventricular arrhythmias in dogs.
Chandler, JC; Monnet, E; Staatz, AJ,
)
0.39
", group III was treated with CCl4 for 6 weeks and received propranolol x2 at the same dosage as group I, while group VI was treated with CCl4 and the same drug dosage as group II."( H3 Propranolol serum levels following lidocaine administration in rats with CCL4 induced liver damage.
Anagnostopoulou, S; Kotsiou, A; Tesseromatis, C; Tsamouri, M; Tzivras, M; Vairactaris, E,
)
0.4
"Develop a dose-response curve for the effect of intranasal lidocaine on food intake."( Using intranasal lidocaine to reduce food intake.
Caruso, MK; Cowley, MA; Cruickshank, S; DeYoung, L; Dumas, K; England, M; Greenway, FL; Gupta, AK; Kamdar, K; Laidlaw, BJ; Martin, CK; Roberts, AT; Rogers, B; Whitehouse, J, 2007
)
0.92
" Thus, it is not recommended to increase the lidocaine dosage during ECC."( Compartmental analysis of lidocaine kinetics during extracorporeal circulation.
Feo, L; Mezza, A; Monaco, C; Schiavello, R; Sciarra, M, 1988
)
0.83
"In a double-blind, side-by-side, controlled, randomized clinical trial, 29 patients were injected with 100 mouse units of botulinum toxin A (Botox); Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland, Westport, Ireland) reconstituted in lidocaine into one axilla and with the same dosage of the toxin, reconstituted in an equal volume of saline, into the other axilla."( Treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis with botulinum toxin type A reconstituted in lidocaine or in normal saline: a randomized, side-by-side, double-blind study.
Simonart, T; Vadoud-Seyedi, J, 2007
)
0.75
"After a single dose of 125 mg lidocaine the average extent of exposure in terms of the AUC(tau,sd) during a 6 h dosage interval amounted to 397."( Proof of systemic safety of a lidocaine ointment in the treatment of patients with anorectal pain.
Mazur, D; Schlegelmilch, R; Seiler, D; Vens-Cappell, B; Zimmermann, J, 2007
)
0.92
" All groups were dosed once weekly, except for the TPA group, which was dosed twice per week."( 26-Week dermal oncogenicity study evaluating pure trans-capsaicin in Tg.AC hemizygous mice (FBV/N).
Babbar, S; Bley, K; Burlew, JA; Chanda, S; Erexson, G; Frost, D,
)
0.13
" Both morphine and lidocaine retained topical activity following chronic sciatic nerve injury, but their analgesic dose-response curves were shifted to the right when compared to sham-operated mice."( Reorganization of dorsal root ganglion neurons following chronic sciatic nerve constriction injury: correlation with morphine and lidocaine analgesia.
El-Maarouf Abderrahman, A; El-Maarouf, A; Kolesnikov, Y; Pasternak, G; Rutinhauser, U; Rutishauser, U, 2007
)
0.87
" It is proposed that newer agents such as lidocaine could be effective in reducing pain and alleviating the escalating opioid dosage requirements in patients with burn injury."( Lidocaine for pain relief in burn injured patients.
Cleland, H; Wasiak, J, 2007
)
2.05
"Both gabapentin and pregabalin are approved for the management of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), although dosing and pharmacokinetic differences between these medications may affect their use in actual practice."( A retrospective evaluation of the use of gabapentin and pregabalin in patients with postherpetic neuralgia in usual-care settings.
Gore, M; Sadosky, A; Stacey, B; Tai, KS, 2007
)
0.34
" The protection of mitochondrial functions was almost complete at a dosage of 10 mg/kg/day during normothermic ischemia and 10 microg/ml in the preservation liquid during hypothermic ischemia."( Protection of cellular and mitochondrial functions against liver ischemia by N-benzyl-N'-(2-hydroxy-3,4-dimethoxybenzyl)-piperazine (BHDP), a sigma1 ligand.
Ferchichi, H; Klouz, A; Kourda, N; Lakhal, M; Morin, D; Ouanes, L; Saïd, DB; Tillement, JP, 2008
)
0.35
" The requested frequency and dosage of meperidine, the first spontaneous voiding time, the frequency of single urinary catheterization, and a patient satisfaction score were also obtained."( Use of a topical anesthetic cream (EMLA) to reduce pain after hemorrhoidectomy.
Chen, HS; Hung, KC; Lin, SE; Shiau, JM; Su, HP; Tseng, CC,
)
0.13
"The VAS score and frequency and dosage of meperidine injections were significantly lower in the EMLA group than in the control group (P < ."( Use of a topical anesthetic cream (EMLA) to reduce pain after hemorrhoidectomy.
Chen, HS; Hung, KC; Lin, SE; Shiau, JM; Su, HP; Tseng, CC,
)
0.13
"Prior to paravertebral dosing there were no differences in terms of the hemodynamic variables studied."( Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of a single 5 mg/kg dose of lidocaine with or without epinephrine for thoracic paravertebral block.
Cirujano, A; Cruz, P; De la Gala, F; Garutti, I; Olmedilla, L; Piñeiro, P,
)
0.37
" Although prazosin (10 microg/kg/min) markedly shifted the phenylephrine (alpha(1)-agonist) dose-response curve to the right, it did not have any effect on clofilium-induced prolongation of QTc and MAPD(90) (43 +/- 7 and 53 +/- 9%, respectively) or the occurrence of TdP (seven of eight)."( Antitorsadogenic effects of ({+/-})-N-(2,6-dimethyl-phenyl)-(4[2-hydroxy-3-(2-methoxyphenoxy)propyl]-1-piperazine (ranolazine) in anesthetized rabbits.
Belardinelli, L; Dhalla, AK; Robertson, C; Wang, WQ, 2008
)
0.35
"The purposes of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of epidural lidocaine in geriatric patients, to search for any difference in the PK behavior of epidural lidocaine when dopamine is given concurrently, and to develop a descriptive PK model from which to calculate dosage and infusion regimens of epidural lidocaine to define and achieve desired target goals in either the epidural or the serum compartment."( A population pharmacokinetic model of epidural lidocaine in geriatric patients: effects of low-dose dopamine.
Guilder, MV; Jelliffe, RW; Kwa, A; Sprung, J, 2008
)
0.82
" For the treatment of DHS in parkinsonian patients, an increase in the dosage of l-dopa and a decrease in that of the dopamine agonist should be considered."( Mechanism and treatment of dropped head syndrome associated with parkinsonism.
Hattori, N; Hayashi, A; Mizuno, Y; Oyama, G, 2009
)
0.35
"The dosage to elicit plantarflexion is similar to the dosage to elicit dorsiflexion in sciatic nerve blockade."( [Determination of median effective dose of lidocaine to control the onset time of sciatic nerve blockade using up-and-down sequential method].
Chen, LM; Guo, XY; Jin, LL; Xu, XZ, 2008
)
0.61
", differences in the type and degree of liver dysfunction of the animals and patients examined, and in the type and dosage of the inducing agent used."( Enzyme inhibition and induction in liver disease.
De Martin, S; Orlando, R; Palatini, P; Pegoraro, P, 2008
)
0.35
" Patients' age, type of procedure, pressure of gas insufflated, length of procedure, dosage of oral/parenteral analgesics, and trocar-related complications were evaluated."( Is local anesthesia or oral analgesics necessary after mini-laparoscopic functional surgery in children and young adults?: A prospective randomized trial.
Tsai, YC; Wu, CC; Yang, SS, 2008
)
0.35
" Both drugs were tested on C2C12 myoblasts and an analysis was performed using propidium iodide staining followed by an imaging processing routine to obtain quantitative dose-response profiles in the gradient maker."( A microfluidic gradient maker for toxicity testing of bupivacaine and lidocaine.
Ahluwalia, A; Marano, M; Tirella, A; Vozzi, F, 2008
)
0.58
" As compared with 4% lidocaine, however, 2% lidocaine requires a smaller dosage and results in lower plasma concentrations."( Spray-as-you-go airway topical anesthesia in patients with a difficult airway: a randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% and 4% lidocaine.
Guo, XL; He, N; Liao, X; Liu, HP; Xu, XZ; Xu, YC; Xue, FS; Yang, QY; Zhang, YM, 2009
)
0.88
" All patients took diclofenac in dosage 100 mg per day from the 1st day."( [The use of lidocaine-coated plates (versatis) in the treatment of back pain].
Levin, OS; Moseĭkin, IA, 2009
)
0.73
"5 years) and the dose-response setting, 10 volunteers (mean age 24."( Mydriasis with different preparations of topically administered lidocaine hydrochloride.
Behndig, A; Claesson, M; Johansson, M, 2009
)
0.59
"75) times and the mean oral dosage of NSAID was (1267 +/- 325) mg."( Continuous epidural block of the cervical vertebrae for cervicogenic headache.
Guo, YN; He, MW; Liu, JJ; Ni, JX; Wang, Q; Yang, LQ, 2009
)
0.35
"5 hours after dosing in both the Korean and Japanese subjects."( An open-label, single-dose, parallel-group, dose-increasing study comparing the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of pilsicainide hydrochloride in healthy Korean and Japanese male subjects.
Hong, JH; Jang, IJ; Kim, BH; Kim, JR; Kim, JW; Kim, KP; Lim, KS; Shin, SG; Tanaka, T; Yu, KS, 2009
)
0.35
" In contrast, when doses along the ascending limb were available for self-administration, lidocaine inactivation of the lateral orbitofrontal cortex caused reductions in responding and cocaine intake, resulting in overall flattening of dose-response curves."( Role of the orbitofrontal cortex and dorsal striatum in regulating the dose-related effects of self-administered cocaine.
Goodrich, CM; Janes, AC; Kantak, KM; Mashhoon, Y; Silverman, DN, 2009
)
0.57
" Upon success, this type of dosage form may open up new avenues towards dentistry."( Development of Denticap, a matrix based sustained release formulation for treatment of toothache, dental infection and other gum problem.
Ghosh, S; Mukherjee, B; Roy, G, 2009
)
0.35
" A step-up/step-down study model was used with nonprobability sequential dosing based on the outcome of the previous patient."( An estimation of the minimum effective anesthetic volume of 2% lidocaine in ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block.
Iohom, G; O'Donnell, BD, 2009
)
0.59
" Findings attributable to Proliferol after 24 hours included dose-response elevations in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and creatine kinase, which returned to normal after 14 days."( Acute toxicity evaluation of proliferol: a dose-escalating, placebo-controlled study in swine.
Dagenais, S; Green, R; Hite, M; Mayer, J; Wooley, J,
)
0.13
" Local administration of lidocaine was shown to ablate all stimulation-induced fMRI signals by the total blockage of peripheral nerve transmission, while the analgesic effect of systemically administered lidocaine was robustly detected after intravenous infusion of approximately 3mg/kg, which is similar to clinical dosage for human."( fMRI investigation of the effect of local and systemic lidocaine on noxious electrical stimulation-induced activation in spinal cord.
Abbadie, C; Cook, JJ; Hargreaves, R; Meng, X; Reicin, AS; Ritter, A; Welsh, DC; Williams, DS; Williams, M; Zhao, F, 2009
)
0.9
"A patient developed anaphylactic shock after a heparin dosage during an operation to make inner shunt for chronic renal failure of Alport syndrome."( [Case of anosmia which appeared after anaphylactic shock due to intravenous heparin].
Ishikawa, S; Kobinata, H; Makita, K; Nakazawa, K; Uchida, T; Yamamoto, M, 2009
)
0.35
"An intravenous bolus injection and subsequent continuous infusion of NIF at a relatively low dosage were effective in treating severe ventricular tachyarrhythmias complicating ACS, reducing the potential risk of proarrhythmia."( Effects of intravenous nifekalant as a lifesaving drug for severe ventricular tachyarrhythmias complicating acute coronary syndrome.
Abe, A; Ikeda, T; Ishiguro, H; Mera, H; Miwa, Y; Miyakoshi, M; Shimizu, H; Tsukada, T; Yoshino, H; Yusu, S, 2009
)
0.35
"7-2 mg/kg) were as low as 7-20-fold less than the experimental intravenous dosage (14."( Accidental induced seizures in three cynomologus macaques following administration of ceftriaxone dissolved in 1% lidocaine diluent.
Dror, M, 2010
)
0.57
" Use of a forearm tourniquet allows the dosage of local anesthetic to be decreased to almost half of what is required with an upper arm tourniquet, and the incidence of tourniquet pain has been reported to be less with forearm tourniquet."( Forearm IVRA, using 0.5% lidocaine in a dose of 1.5 mg/kg with ketorolac 0.15 mg/kg for hand and wrist surgeries.
Bhadoria, P; Bhagwat, A; Kohli, A; Singh, R, 2010
)
0.66
" Main outcomes recorded were dosage of lidocaine administered and amount of conscious sedation (midazolam and fentanyl) administered for pain management."( A review of physician anaesthesia prescribing practices in an abortion clinic in British Columbia.
Fitzsimmons, BP; Hodgson, ZG; MacKay-Dunn, MH; Mo, D, 2010
)
0.63
" Further studies on the optimal regimen and dosing of anesthesia are required."( A randomized trial of topical anesthesia comparing lidocaine versus lidocaine plus xylometazoline for unsedated transnasal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Bailey, R; Cheung, J; Fedorak, R; Goodman, K; Guzowski, T; Millan, M; Morse, J; van Zanten, SV, 2010
)
0.61
"Although there appears to be more evidence for the use of lidocaine than phenytoin as adjunctive treatment for TCA-associated cardiotoxicity, specific clinical indications and dosing recommendations remain to be defined."( What is the role of lidocaine or phenytoin in tricyclic antidepressant-induced cardiotoxicity?
Benowitz, N; Foianini, A; Joseph Wiegand, T, 2010
)
0.93
"Taken together, the MTG-containing ZnO can be a more effective and convenient delivery system for the treatment of hemorrhoid with a reduced dosage interval."( Effect of zinc oxide on the rheological and mucoadhesive properties of poloxamer 407-based mucoadhesive thermosensitive gel.
Choi, HG; Kim, CK; Kim, HT; Kim, ST; Park, JS; Park, TH, 2010
)
0.36
"To compare a surgically adjusted dose of strabismus surgery using topical anesthesia in cooperative patients with dosage guidelines adapted to the surgeon's personal technique using sub-Tenon's anesthesia."( Surgery for esotropia under topical anesthesia.
Ogallar, C; Rodríguez, JM; Tejedor, J, 2010
)
0.36
" Hydrogen peroxide was tested on human endothelial cells, while lidocaine was tested on C2C12 myoblasts and an analysis was performed using propidium iodide staining followed by an imaging processing routine to obtain quantitative dose-response profiles in the gradient maker."( Finite element modelling and design of a concentration gradient generating bioreactor: application to biological pattern formation and toxicology.
Ahluwalia, A; Mazzei, D; Tirella, A; Vozzi, F; Vozzi, G, 2010
)
0.6
" These findings may have implications for dosing of local anesthetics in diabetic patients undergoing regional analgesia with nerve blocks."( Local anesthetic sciatic nerve block and nerve fiber damage in diabetic rats.
Buvanendran, A; Kerns, JM; Kroin, JS; Moric, M; Tuman, KJ; Wagenaar, B; Williams, DK,
)
0.13
" Dosing regimens, volumes of injection, and injection schedules varied greatly."( Patterns of use of peripheral nerve blocks and trigger point injections among headache practitioners in the USA: Results of the American Headache Society Interventional Procedure Survey (AHS-IPS).
Ashkenazi, A; Blumenfeld, A; DePalma, T; Grosberg, B; Lipton, RB; Napchan, U; Narouze, S; Nett, B; Rosenthal, B; Tepper, S, 2010
)
0.36
" Two dose-response studies were then performed with and without surgical stimulation."( Intravenous lidocaine infusion reduces bispectral index-guided requirements of propofol only during surgical stimulation.
Bonhomme, V; Hans, GA; Hans, PC; Joris, JL; Kaba, A; Lamy, ML; Lauwick, SM; Struys, MM, 2010
)
0.74
" The validated HPLC method was successfully extended to the analysis of the combined topical dosage form (soluble dressing) where no interfering peaks were encountered from the dosage form matrix or the inactive ingredients."( HPLC-DAD stability indicating determination of nitrofurazone and lidocaine hydrochloride in their combined topical dosage form.
Belal, TS; Shaalan, RA, 2010
)
0.6
" The most commonly used quinine dosage was 300 mg/day (range 200 to 500 mg)."( Quinine for muscle cramps.
Al Musa, T; El-Tawil, S; El-Tawil, T; Lunn, MP; Valli, H; Weber, M, 2010
)
0.36
" Lidocaine dosage averaged 10."( Water-assisted liposuction for body contouring and lipoharvesting: safety and efficacy in 41 consecutive patients.
Sasaki, GH, 2011
)
1.28
"Despite the findings of a previous cohort study favouring the use of lidocaine, this study demonstrated that lidocaine at this dosage and means of administration showed a lack of efficacy for treating scleroderma despite the absence of significant adverse effects."( Lidocaine for systemic sclerosis: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.
Andrade, LE; Kayser, C; Riera, R; Souza, AW; Trevisani, VF; Yanagita, ET, 2011
)
2.05
" Analysis of the complete dose-response relationship yielded a half-maximal inhibitory concentration of 11."( Inhibition of acid sensing ion channel currents by lidocaine in cultured mouse cortical neurons.
Chu, X; Cottrell, JE; Li, M; Lin, J; Maysami, S; Si, H; Simon, RP; Xiong, Z, 2011
)
0.62
" In the presence of higher lidocaine doses, nicotinic receptors were blocked both at positive and negative potentials, acetylcholine dose-response curve shifted to the right and lidocaine pre-application, before its co-application with acetylcholine, enhanced the current inhibition, indicating all together that lidocaine also blocked resting receptors; besides, it increased the current decay rate."( Multiple inhibitory actions of lidocaine on Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptors transplanted to Xenopus oocytes.
Alberola-Die, A; González-Ros, JM; Ivorra, I; Martinez-Pinna, J; Morales, A, 2011
)
0.95
"The popularity of large-volume liposuction and the toxicity of lidocaine have led to a reduction of lidocaine dosage in tumescent liposuction."( Tumescent liposuction: partitioning of lidocaine at a lower dose (252 mg/l).
Cao, W; Wang, G, 2011
)
0.88
" Lidocaine infusions should be dosed by body weight and decreased after 24 hours to avoid potential toxicity in long-term infusions."( Population pharmacokinetics of lidocaine administered during and after cardiac surgery.
Hsu, YW; Mathew, JP; Newman, MF; Somma, J, 2011
)
1.57
" In a previous study, a dosing regimen was developed for term neonates, but it was not evaluated for preterm neonates."( Lidocaine (lignocaine) dosing regimen based upon a population pharmacokinetic model for preterm and term neonates with seizures.
de Vries, LS; Egberts, TC; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, AD; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van den Broek, MP; van Hasselt, JG, 2011
)
1.81
"The requirements for this dosing regimen were simplicity of implementation, equal initial doses for all weight categories and avoidance of plasma concentrations >9 mg/L."( Lidocaine (lignocaine) dosing regimen based upon a population pharmacokinetic model for preterm and term neonates with seizures.
de Vries, LS; Egberts, TC; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, AD; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van den Broek, MP; van Hasselt, JG, 2011
)
1.81
" Based on this pharmacokinetic model, a dosing strategy for lidocaine for neonatal seizure control was developed, which allows rapid and safe administration of lidocaine in this population."( Lidocaine (lignocaine) dosing regimen based upon a population pharmacokinetic model for preterm and term neonates with seizures.
de Vries, LS; Egberts, TC; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, AD; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van den Broek, MP; van Hasselt, JG, 2011
)
2.05
"A lidocaine dosing regimen for seizure control in preterm and term neonates has been developed using population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation."( Lidocaine (lignocaine) dosing regimen based upon a population pharmacokinetic model for preterm and term neonates with seizures.
de Vries, LS; Egberts, TC; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, AD; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van den Broek, MP; van Hasselt, JG, 2011
)
2.53
"The comparator could be placebo, nitroglycerin ointment, or lateral internal sphincterotomy, with dosage ranging from 20 IU to 50 IU of botulinum toxin."( Botulinum toxin and anal fissure: efficacy and safety systematic review.
Yiannakopoulou, E, 2012
)
0.38
" In one patient, severe hypoglycemia limited dosing to 500 mg daily, but this was sufficient for VT control."( Ranolazine reduces ventricular tachycardia burden and ICD shocks in patients with drug-refractory ICD shocks.
Anderson, JL; Bair, TL; Bunch, TJ; Crandall, BG; Day, JD; Lappe, DL; Mader, KM; Mahapatra, S; May, HT; Molden, J; Muhlestein, JB; Murdock, D; Osborn, JS; Weiss, JP, 2011
)
0.37
" After rats were injected intrathecally with diphenhydramine and pheniramine, the dose-response curves were obtained."( Spinal anesthesia with diphenhydramine and pheniramine in rats.
Chen, YC; Chen, YW; Chu, CC; Hung, CH; Li, ZY; Wang, JJ, 2011
)
0.37
" The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of oral ketamine on the dosage of local anesthetics required and postoperative pain management for irreversibly inflamed mandibular molars."( The effect of orally administered ketamine on requirement for anesthetics and postoperative pain in mandibular molar teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
Ebtehaj, I; Kaviani, N; Khademi, A; Mohammadi, Z, 2011
)
0.37
"To evaluate the effectiveness and determine the minimal dosage of intraperitoneal lidocaine for pain relief during postpartum tubal resection in Srinagarind Hospital."( Intraperitoneal lidocaine for decreasing intra-operative pain during postpartum tubal resection in Srinagarind Hospital.
Prasit, M; Rattanalappaiboon, D; Tharnprisan, P; Werawatakul, Y, 2012
)
0.95
" It is proposed that newer agents such as lidocaine could be effective in reducing pain and alleviating the escalating opioid dosage requirements in patients with burn injury."( Intravenous lidocaine for the treatment of background or procedural burn pain.
Cleland, H; Danilla, S; Mahar, P; McGuinness, SK; Spinks, A; Wasiak, J, 2012
)
1.02
" The potencies and equipotent doses were determined for infiltrative cutaneous analgesia on the rat back by determination of dose-response curves for propranolol and lidocaine."( Propranolol elicits cutaneous analgesia against skin nociceptive stimuli in rats.
Chen, YC; Chen, YW; Chu, CC; Hung, CH; Wang, JJ, 2012
)
0.57
" The usage of conscious sedation, dosage of lidocaine/pethidin was similar between groups."( Comparison of a powered bone marrow biopsy device with a manual system: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Bucher, CM; Dirnhofer, S; Lehmann, T; Passweg, J; Rovó, A; Tichelli, A; Tzankov, A, 2013
)
0.65
" In this article, patient selection, lidocaine dosing and safety, and patient monitoring are reviewed."( Anesthesia for office procedures.
Simpson, CB; Wang, SX, 2013
)
0.66
" Patients continued prescribed analgesic dosing regimens."( Effectiveness of a heated lidocaine/tetracaine topical patch for pain associated with myofascial trigger points: results of an open-label pilot study.
Busch, M; Marriott, T; Rauck, R, 2013
)
0.69
" Hypothermia may affect the efficacy, safety and dosing of lidocaine in these patients."( Anticonvulsant treatment of asphyxiated newborns under hypothermia with lidocaine: efficacy, safety and dosing.
de Vries, LS; Egberts, AC; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, AD; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van den Broek, MP; van Straaten, HL, 2013
)
0.87
"To study the efficacy and safety of lidocaine in newborns with perinatal asphyxia during moderate hypothermia, and to develop an effective and safe dosing regimen."( Anticonvulsant treatment of asphyxiated newborns under hypothermia with lidocaine: efficacy, safety and dosing.
de Vries, LS; Egberts, AC; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, AD; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van den Broek, MP; van Straaten, HL, 2013
)
0.9
" An optimal dosing regimen was developed with simulations using data from a pharmacokinetic model."( Anticonvulsant treatment of asphyxiated newborns under hypothermia with lidocaine: efficacy, safety and dosing.
de Vries, LS; Egberts, AC; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, AD; Rademaker, CM; Toet, MC; van den Broek, MP; van Straaten, HL, 2013
)
0.62
" The dosage of lidocaine needed to provide analgesia using the forearm Bier block is significantly reduced, thereby minimizing the potential for these complications."( Forearm Bier block: a new regional anesthetic technique for upper extremity surgery.
Arslanian, B; Kim, DC; Kramer, T; Mehrzad, R, 2014
)
0.76
" (4) Cutaneous sensory blockade does not appear to alter nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation, adrenergic vasoconstriction, or cholinergic eccrine sweating dose-response sensitivity or responsiveness to maximal dose."( Topical anaesthesia does not affect cutaneous vasomotor or sudomotor responses in human skin.
Metzler-Wilson, K; Wilson, TE, 2013
)
0.39
" We collected data regarding the indication for the termination procedure, gestational age, site of lidocaine injection, dosage of lidocaine, need for additional to produce asystole, and maternal complications."( Effectiveness and safety of lidocaine in the induction of fetal cardiac asystole for second trimester pregnany termination.
de la Vega, A; López-Cepero, R; Lynch, L, 2013
)
0.9
" Further studies are needed to clarify the effects of dosage and timing of lidocaine on hemodynamic changes."( Efficacy of intravenous lidocaine versus placebo on attenuating cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Du, BX; Qi, DY; Shi, XY; Wang, K; Wang, L; Xu, FY; Zhang, H; Zou, Z, 2013
)
0.93
" Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes depend on the nature and degree of hepatic impairment and on the characteristics of the dosed drug."( [Effect of liver cirrhosis on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs].
Perlík, F, 2013
)
0.39
" There are often patients who desire extensive liposuction on approximately 30% of total body surface area, which means the lidocaine total dose might be over the dosing recommendation."( Safe extensive tumescent liposuction with segmental infiltration of lower concentration lidocaine under monitored anesthesia care.
Cao, WG; Jiang, ZH; Li, SL; Liu, LN; Wang, G, 2015
)
0.85
" The proposed methods were checked using laboratory-prepared mixtures and were successfully applied for the analysis of pharmaceutical formulation containing the cited drugs with no interference from other dosage form additives."( Successive spectrophotometric resolution as a novel technique for the analysis of ternary mixtures of pharmaceuticals.
Fahmy, NM; Lotfy, HM; Shehata, MA; Tawakkol, SM, 2014
)
0.4
"To evaluate the effect and safety of propofol target controlled infusion (TCI) with a small dosage of fentanyl intravenous sedation on the removal of the third impacted molar tooth."( [Evaluation of propofol target controlled infusion with fentanyl intravenous sedation on the removal of impacted wisdom tooth].
Guan, M; Liu, Y; Wang, EB; Zhang, W, 2014
)
0.4
"Propofol TCI with a small dosage of fentanyl intravenous sedation on the removal of impacted wisdom tooth is effective and safe."( [Evaluation of propofol target controlled infusion with fentanyl intravenous sedation on the removal of impacted wisdom tooth].
Guan, M; Liu, Y; Wang, EB; Zhang, W, 2014
)
0.4
" No significant difference was observed in the proportion of women requesting analgesia and in the total dosage of analgesics between the two groups."( Effect of local infiltration analgesia on post-operative pain following TVT-O: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study.
Di Carlo, C; Fabozzi, A; Formisano, C; Nappi, C; Tommaselli, GA, 2014
)
0.4
" In literature, there is no research investigating the effect of lidocaine infusion on remifentanil and anesthetic dosage used in hypotensive anesthesia."( Impact of perioperative lidocaine infusion and bis monitorization on remifentanil dosage in hypotensive anesthesia.
Aypar, U; Erden, A; Uzun, S; Yuce, Y, 2014
)
0.95
"kg(-1) bolus dosage given in 10 minutes."( Impact of perioperative lidocaine infusion and bis monitorization on remifentanil dosage in hypotensive anesthesia.
Aypar, U; Erden, A; Uzun, S; Yuce, Y, 2014
)
0.71
" The best dosage of this drug for postoperative analgesia remains to be elucidated."( [Efficacy and safety of remifentanil-based regimen for postoperative pain management in abdominal surgery patients: a double-blind study with low-dose remifentanil infusion of 0.02 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)].
Hirano, H; Kaida, T; Machino, A; Nagasaka, Y; Shirasaki, R; Wakamatsu, M, 2014
)
0.4
" The optimized microemulsion systems in gel dosage forms revealed the better permeability over commercial cream (CC) through abdominal rat skin."( Phospholipid microemulsion-based hydrogel for enhanced topical delivery of lidocaine and prilocaine: QbD-based development and evaluation.
Beg, S; Katare, OP; Negi, P; Raza, K; Sharma, G; Singh, B, 2016
)
0.66
" Lidocaine dose-response (with or without epinephrine) on cultured ASCs was examined."( Lidocaine-induced ASC apoptosis (tumescent vs. local anesthesia).
Baynosa, RC; Fang, XH; Khiabani, KT; Stephenson, LL; Wang, WZ; Williams, SJ; Zamboni, WA, 2014
)
2.76
" However, before these agents are recommended for general use, large multicenter trials should be done exploring not only efficacy but also dose-response relationships and side effects."( Novel preoperative pharmacologic methods of preventing postoperative sore throat due to tracheal intubation.
Austin, PN; Kalil, DM; Silvestro, LS, 2014
)
0.4
" All 12 clinical trials evaluating the safety of EMLA in either the pediatric or adult population generally followed dosing and administration guidelines set by the manufacturer and reported clinically insignificant plasma levels of methemoglobin, lidocaine, prilocaine, and their respective metabolites."( Risk of systemic toxicity with topical lidocaine/prilocaine: a review.
Koo, JY; Tran, AN, 2014
)
0.85
" It has been proposed that newer agents such as lidocaine could be effective in reducing pain and alleviating the escalating opioid dosage requirements in people with burn injury."( Intravenous lidocaine for the treatment of background or procedural burn pain.
Cleland, H; Danilla, S; Mahar, PD; McGuinness, SK; Spinks, A; Tan, HB; Wasiak, J, 2014
)
1.04
"2%; n=22) reported using bupivacaine in their wetting solutions (bupivacaine group) and provided a dosage range of 62."( Local anesthetic use in tumescent liposuction: an American Society of Plastic Surgeons survey.
Daniali, LN; Hsia, HC; Lee, ES; Paik, AM, 2015
)
0.42
" In adults, pre-TEE lidocaine anesthesia with recommended dosage results in significant increase in methemoglobin blood level, which however does not exceed normal values and does not result in clinically evident methemoglobinemia."( The influence of lidocaine topical anesthesia during transesophageal echocardiography on blood methemoglobin level and risk of methemoglobinemia.
Filipiak-Strzecka, D; Kasprzak, JD; Lipiec, P; Walusiak-Skorupa, J; Wiszniewska, M, 2015
)
1.08
" Group C received the same dosage of saline at the same time."( Intravenous lidocaine for effective pain relief after a laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Ahn, E; Choi, GJ; Choi, SW; Kang, H; Kim, BG; Park, YH; Yang, SY, 2015
)
0.8
" The size of PPCs, their frequency and their rate of propagation were not affected by intra-arterial dosage with tetrodotoxin or lidocaine."( Characterisation of the contractile dynamics of the resting ex vivo urinary bladder of the pig.
Chambers, JP; Hulls, CM; Janssen, PW; King, QM; Lentle, RG; Reynolds, GW, 2015
)
0.62
" The most commonly used quinine dosage was 300 mg/day (range 200 to 500 mg)."( Quinine for muscle cramps.
Al Musa, T; Brassington, R; El-Tawil, S; El-Tawil, T; Lunn, MP; Valli, H; Weber, M, 2015
)
0.42
"There is no evidence to judge optimal dosage or duration of quinine treatment."( Quinine for muscle cramps.
Al Musa, T; Brassington, R; El-Tawil, S; El-Tawil, T; Lunn, MP; Valli, H; Weber, M, 2015
)
0.42
" Ongoing safety evaluation and research is warranted since this is the first known report in the literature describing implementation of a weight-based dosing SOP."( Pain management prior to nasogastric tube placement: atomized lidocaine.
Bruene, D; Farrington, M; Wagner, M, 2015
)
0.66
" The potential efficacy of these MN for paediatric dosing was investigated via in vitro and in vivo studies."( Potential of hydrogel-forming and dissolving microneedles for use in paediatric populations.
Caffarel-Salvador, E; Donnelly, RF; McCarthy, HO; McElnay, JC; Mooney, K; Tuan-Mahmood, TM; Woolfson, AD, 2015
)
0.42
" Compared with intravenous injection, another method for rAAV delivery to the broad central nervous system (CNS), the intrathecal injection reduced the dosage of rAAV required to achieve similar or higher levels of transgene expression in the CNS by ~100-fold."( A Single Injection of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus into the Lumbar Cistern Delivers Transgene Expression Throughout the Whole Spinal Cord.
Gao, G; Guo, Y; Qiao, T; Su, Q; Wang, D; Xu, Z; Yang, C, 2016
)
0.43
" Generic drugs for topical use, in the case of sheet-like products, are required to be the same as the original drug in terms of application area and dosage form."( [Effect of Adhesives on the Properties of Adhesion, Drug Release and Skin Permeation of Lidocaine Tapes].
Hosoya, O; Ishihara, T; Juni, K; Mikami, M; Sugino, M, 2015
)
0.64
" After intrathecally injecting the rats with five doses of each drug, the dose-response curves of memantine and lidocaine were constructed."( Memantine elicits spinal blockades of motor function, proprioception, and nociception in rats.
Chen, YW; Chiu, CC; Hung, CH; Liu, KS; Wang, JJ, 2015
)
0.63
" The dose regimen of lidocaine varied, with some using bolus dosing alone; others used a combination of bolus and infusion therapy."( Lidocaine for Status Epilepticus in Pediatrics.
Gillman, LM; Kazina, CJ; Teitelbaum, J; West, M; Zeiler, FA; Zeiler, KJ, 2015
)
2.18
" Therapy with these agents is often complicated because of the presence of significant associated adverse effects, clinician unfamiliarity, variable dosing strategies, and the potential for drug-drug interactions."( Continuous intravenous antiarrhythmic agents in the intensive care unit: strategies for safe and effective use of amiodarone, lidocaine, and procainamide.
Mohrien, KM; Oliphant, CS; Samarin, MJ,
)
0.34
" The dose regimen of lidocaine varied, with some utilizing bolus dosing alone; others utilizing a combination of bolus and infusion therapy."( Lidocaine for status epilepticus in adults.
Gillman, LM; Kazina, CJ; Teitelbaum, J; West, M; Zeiler, FA; Zeiler, KJ, 2015
)
2.18
" Knowledge of proper lidocaine dosage can prevent LAST."( Lidocaine-Induced Cardiac Arrest in the Emergency Department: Effectiveness of Lipid Therapy.
Murano, T; Natal, B; Tierney, KJ, 2016
)
2.2
" Although tumescent lidocaine anesthesia is used for an increasing variety of surgical procedures, the maximum safe dosage is unknown."( Estimated Maximal Safe Dosages of Tumescent Lidocaine.
Jeske, DR; Klein, JA, 2016
)
1.02
"The measured data and simulations for pharmacologically unstimulated contraction resembled findings in native human heart tissue, while the pharmacological dose-response curves were highly accurate and consistent with reference data."( Mechano-Pharmacological Characterization of Cardiomyocytes Derived from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
Artmann, AT; Artmann, GM; Bayer, R; Epple, M; Frotscher, R; Goßmann, M; Linder, P; Neumann, S; Staat, M, 2016
)
0.43
" The peak plasma concentration as observed with the standard institutional dosing of tumescent lidocaine appeared below the threshold for human toxicity."( Tumescent technique without epinephrine for endovenous laser therapy and serum lidocaine concentration.
Bailey, MM; Hudson, AJ; Lenart, MJ; Szpisjak, DF; Whittaker, DR, 2015
)
0.86
" Overall, at the dosing regimen studied, the effect of carprofen on sensitivity and stress following cautery dehorning was minimal."( Impact of carprofen administration on stress and nociception responses of calves to cautery dehorning.
Barth, LA; Coetzee, JF; Gehring, R; Hsu, WH; Labeur, L; Millman, ST; Stock, ML; Van Engen, NK; Voris, EA; Wang, C; Wulf, LW, 2016
)
0.43
" In this study, different types of polymeric matrices were examined, as well as their crosslinking and the presence for the active pharmaceutical ingredient were compared to the pure dosage form."( A NEW APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF MUCOADHESIVENESS OF POLYMERIC MEMBRANES USING SILICONE DISCS.
Bodek, KH; Fiedor, P; Nowak, KM; Szterk, A,
)
0.13
" Solid dosage forms that act by slow dissolution, such as pastilles, are an effective alternative to mouthwashes, for their versatility, ease of administration and extended residence time in the oral cavity."( Nystatin and lidocaine pastilles for the local treatment of oral mucositis.
Almeida, AJ; Machado, P; Marto, JM; Salgado, A; Silva, AN; Silva, FC, 2017
)
0.82
" Other variables included the presence of IVLI-related adverse events and the dosage and duration of IVLI."( Continuous Lidocaine Infusion as Adjunctive Analgesia in Intensive Care Unit Patients.
Antigua, AD; Ebied, AM; Karras, GE; Mo, Y; Thomas, MC, 2017
)
0.84
"Carbamazepine dosage gradually tapered until stop and epileptic pain attacks become less and less, eventually disappear."( A case report of stellate ganglion block in the treatment of epileptic pain.
Wang, S; Zhu, Y, 2017
)
0.46
"Printing technology has been shown to enable flexible fabrication of solid dosage forms for personalized drug therapy."( Development of Oromucosal Dosage Forms by Combining Electrospinning and Inkjet Printing.
Heinämäki, J; Kogermann, K; Laidmäe, I; Meos, A; Palo, M; Preis, M; Sandler, N, 2017
)
0.46
"Heat pain thresholds and pain ratings to supra-threshold heat stimulation did not differ between EM-patients (n = 27) and controls (n = 25), neither did the dose-response curves for lidocaine."( Pain thresholds, supra-threshold pain and lidocaine sensitivity in patients with erythromelalgia, including the I848Tmutation in Na
Helås, T; Jönsson, B; Jørum, E; Kleggetveit, IP; Quiding, H; Sagafos, D; Salter, H; Schmelz, M; Segerdahl, M; Zhang, Z, 2017
)
0.91
" Utilizing a 90-day BUD, lidocaine can be packaged separately from other magic mouthwash ingredients in individual dosage units and applied to the oral cavity using the swish-and-spit method."( Beyond-use dating of lidocaine alone and in two "magic mouthwash" preparations.
Brown, SD; Huffman, J; Kirk, LM; Lewis, PO; Luu, Y; Ogle, A, 2017
)
1.08
"A dosage of 40 mg lidocaine is an appropriate dosage to alleviate propofol injection pain within the same vein."( Intravenous Lidocaine Alleviates the Pain of Propofol Injection by Local Anesthetic and Central Analgesic Effects.
Cai, J; Hei, Z; Liang, L; Luo, C; Xing, J; Zhou, S, 2018
)
1.19
" Measurements included intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, and the volume of intravenous fluids and dosage of vasoactive medications administered."( The effects of intravenous lignocaine on depth of anaesthesia and intraoperative haemodynamics during open radical prostatectomy.
Hu, R; Jang, J; McNicol, L; Rachbuch, C; Tan, C; Weinberg, L, 2017
)
0.46
"Two sensitive, accurate, and precise spectrophotometric methods have been developed and validated for the simultaneous estimation of ofloxacin (OFX), clotrimazole (CLZ), and lignocaine hydrochloride (LGN) in their combined dosage form (ear drops) without prior separation."( Simultaneous Estimation of Ofloxacin, Clotrimazole, and Lignocaine Hydrochloride in Their Combined Ear-Drop Formulation by Two Spectrophotometric Methods.
Bodiwala, K; Kalyankar, G; Marolia, B; Patel, Y; Prajapati, P; Shah, S, 2017
)
0.46
" Additional study is important in order to delineate patient selection, determine optimal dosing and treatment frequency, assess pain reduction and duration, and treatment cost-effectiveness."( Tertiary Care Clinical Experience with Intravenous Lidocaine Infusions for the Treatment of Chronic Pain.
Bokat, CE; Brogan, S; Donaldson, GW; Hagn, EE; Hare, BD; Iacob, E; Junkins, SR; Kennington, KS; Okifuji, A; Sindt, J; Tadler, SC, 2018
)
0.73
" Local anesthetics have been commonly used in interventional procedures for alleviating pain, but local anesthetics may have negative impact on MSC dosing because of cytotoxicity or other biological effects."( Cytotoxicity of Local Anesthetics in Mesenchymal Stem Cells.
Erwin, PJ; Nie, H; Qu, W; Smith, J; van Wijnen, AJ; Wang, Z; Wu, T, 2018
)
0.48
"Objective To investigate whether continuous intravenous intraoperative lidocaine infusion can reduce the opioids dosage and improve postoperative recovery in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic(VATS) lobectomy."( [Effects of Continuous Intravenous Intraoperative Lidocaine Infusion on Opioids Consumption and Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy].
Huang, YG; Liu, ZJ; Shen, L; Song, KC; Yi, J; Zhang, LY; Zheng, XG, 2018
)
0.97
" The methods allowed local measurement of lidocaine in stratum corneum, punch biopsies, and plasma and of 2,6-DMA in plasma and biopsies obtained from minipigs dosed with experimental transdermal formulations."( Measurement of lidocaine and 2,6-dimethylaniline in minipig plasma, skin, and dermal tapes using UHPLC with electrospray MS/MS.
Bakhtiar, R; Engel, BJ; Green, C; King, B; Li, Q; Magers, T; Shoup, R, 2018
)
1.1
" The validated method therefore can be adapted for quality control procedures of the drugs in pharmaceutical dosage forms and their stability studies."( Simultaneous Determination of Dexpanthenol, Lidocaine Hydrochloride, Mepyramine Maleate and their Related Substances by a RP-HPLC Method in Topical Dosage Forms.
Capan, Y; Doganay, A; Gundogdu, SO; Koksel, B, 2018
)
0.74
" Studies conducted in patients with acute primary headache were included if lidocaine was compared with placebo or alternative treatments, lidocaine dosing was specified, and patients' pain before and after treatment were clearly reported."( Intranasal Lidocaine for Acute Management of Primary Headaches: A Systematic Review.
Dagenais, R; Zed, PJ, 2018
)
1.1
" Lidocaine was associated with a lower incidence of cough compared to placebo in adults and children, irrespective of dosage and cough etiology."( Intravenous Lidocaine for the Prevention of Cough: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Clivio, S; Putzu, A; Tramèr, MR, 2019
)
1.8
" The dosing of IV lidocaine varied among studies between a weight-based dose of a 1- to 2-mg/kg bolus, a fixed-bolus dose of 50-100 mg, and a 1-mg/kg/hour continuous infusion."( Intravenous Lidocaine for Acute Pain: A Systematic Review.
Barbas, B; Liang, E; Long, C; Masic, D; Rech, MA; Sterk, EJ, 2018
)
1.19
"0001) whereas no differences in the dosage of sedative drugs were observed between the two groups (all p > 0."( Nebulization versus standard application for topical anaesthesia during flexible bronchoscopy under moderate sedation - a randomized controlled trial.
Cornelissen, C; Dreher, M; Müller, T, 2018
)
0.48
" Comparative examinations of three selected anesthetics (clove oil, lidocaine, and MS-222) with a dosage regime of 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg/L indicated that MS-222 was the most efficient agent for Siberian sturgeon prolarvae, as evidenced by the fast induction of anesthesia with quick and uniform recovery."( Anesthetic protocol for microinjection-related handling of Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baerii; Acipenseriformes) prolarvae.
Kim, EJ; Nam, YK, 2018
)
0.72
" This study investigated the feasibility of using microemulsions for transdermal delivery of a high dosage of lidocaine (10%)."( Design and Development of Lidocaine Microemulsions for Transdermal Delivery.
Hao, J; Song, Y; Wang, X; Wang, Y, 2019
)
1.03
" These results provide approaches to apply longer acting LA with a higher analgesic potency in an appropriate dosage and with an appropriate method of application."( [Pain and distress response of suckling piglets to injection and castration under local anaesthesia with procaine and licocaine - Part 2: Defence behaviour, catecholamines, coordination of movements].
Harlizius, J; Hofmann, K; Numberger, J; Otten, W; Rauh, A; Ritzmann, M; Scholz, T; Schulze-Horsel, T; Weiß, C; Zöls, S, 2019
)
0.51
"Study selection All included studies were randomised controlled trials comparing different agents, different dosage or different concentration of local anaesthetics in clinical procedures or simulated scenarios using parallel or cross-over design with no language or year of publication restrictions."( Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia.
Spivakovsky, S, 2019
)
0.51
"78%, and from combined dosage lignocaine was at 96."( Comparative evaluation of a local anesthetic effect between lignocaine and lignocaine administered with epinephrine in healthy children.
Qiu, J; Zhou, Y, 2019
)
0.51
" Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patients' demographic data, lidocaine dosing and infusion rate, daily opioid intake, adjuvant medication use, and medication allergies and intolerances."( Intravenous Lidocaine for Relief of Chronic Neuropathic Pain.
Albala, MZ; Hudson, A; Lancaster, RJ; Leavitt, K; Margelosky, K; Walesh, M; Wren, K, 2019
)
1.12
" Previous studies have reported on the pharmacokinetics of lidocaine in preterm and term neonates and proposed a dosing regimen for effective and safe lidocaine use."( Lidocaine as treatment for neonatal seizures: Evaluation of previously developed population pharmacokinetic models and dosing regimen.
de Haan, TR; Egberts, TCG; Favié, LMA; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, ADR; Nuytemans, DHGM; Rademaker, CMA; Rijken, M; Simons, SHP; van den Broek, MPH; van Straaten, HLM, 2020
)
2.24
" Simulations were performed to evaluate the proposed dosing regimen."( Lidocaine as treatment for neonatal seizures: Evaluation of previously developed population pharmacokinetic models and dosing regimen.
de Haan, TR; Egberts, TCG; Favié, LMA; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, ADR; Nuytemans, DHGM; Rademaker, CMA; Rijken, M; Simons, SHP; van den Broek, MPH; van Straaten, HLM, 2020
)
2
" Simulations demonstrated that the proposed dosing regimen leads to adequate average lidocaine plasma concentrations."( Lidocaine as treatment for neonatal seizures: Evaluation of previously developed population pharmacokinetic models and dosing regimen.
de Haan, TR; Egberts, TCG; Favié, LMA; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, ADR; Nuytemans, DHGM; Rademaker, CMA; Rijken, M; Simons, SHP; van den Broek, MPH; van Straaten, HLM, 2020
)
2.22
" With the proposed dosing regimen, lidocaine can provide effective and safe treatment for neonatal seizures."( Lidocaine as treatment for neonatal seizures: Evaluation of previously developed population pharmacokinetic models and dosing regimen.
de Haan, TR; Egberts, TCG; Favié, LMA; Groenendaal, F; Huitema, ADR; Nuytemans, DHGM; Rademaker, CMA; Rijken, M; Simons, SHP; van den Broek, MPH; van Straaten, HLM, 2020
)
2.28
" However, the short duration of action (< 2 h) of marketed dosage forms limit their ability to meet clinical needs."( Lidocaine tripotassium phosphate complex laden microemulsion for prolonged local anaesthesia: In vitro and in vivo studies.
Desai, AR; Desai, DT; Maulvi, FA; Patel, HP; Patel, KP; Pillai, LV; Ranch, KM; Shah, DO; Shah, SA; Shukla, MR, 2020
)
2
" Kinetic analyses of MLK infusions in cattle are necessary to establish optimal dosing protocols."( Pharmacokinetics of an intravenous constant rate infusion of a morphine-lidocaine-ketamine combination in Holstein calves undergoing umbilical herniorrhaphy.
Coetzee, JF; Hartnack, AK; Kleinhenz, MD; Lakritz, J; Niehaus, AJ, 2020
)
0.79
" Kinetic analyses of MLK infusions in cattle are necessary to establish optimal dosing protocols and withdrawal intervals."( Analgesic efficacy of an intravenous constant rate infusion of a morphine-lidocaine-ketamine combination in Holstein calves undergoing umbilical herniorrhaphy.
Coetzee, JF; Hartnack, AK; Kleinhenz, MD; Lakritz, J; Niehaus, AJ, 2020
)
0.79
" This is a retrospective case series of 10 cancer patients across four institutions, with attention to dosing of both agents, and subsequent decrease in morphine-equivalent daily dosing (MEDD)."( A Multi-Centered Case Series Highlighting the Clinical Use and Dosing of Lidocaine and Mexiletine for Refractory Cancer Pain.
Atayee, RS; Edmonds, KP; Geiger-Hayes, J; Hausdorff, J; Naidu, D; Saphire, ML, 2020
)
0.79
"Systemic lidocaine infusion can improve QoR-40 scores in patients with upper airway surgery, reduce the dosage of intraoperative opioids, decrease the incidence of PONV and NRS scores 2 days after surgery, thus improving postoperative early recovery quality."( Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Postoperative Early Recovery Quality in Upper Airway Surgery.
Ding, X; Wang, J; Wang, Q; Xie, C; Zhao, W, 2021
)
1.35
" Simplifying local anesthesia mixtures and using dilute concentrations will minimize dosing errors and decrease risk of local anesthesia toxicity."( Local Anesthetic Facelift.
DeJoseph, LM; Pou, JD, 2020
)
0.56
" Semisolid formulations are the most used dosage forms for drug administration via this delivery route and can be optimized when transformed into a film, favoring on-site maintenance, and promoting drug permeation."( A New Approach to Ex Vivo Permeation Studies in In-Situ Film-Forming Systems.
de Freitas, O; Ferreira, MP; Pedrazzi, V; Silva-Alvarez, AF; Vicentini, FTMC, 2020
)
0.56
" In order to investigate these so-called composite dosage forms in more detail, two different manufacturing methods were compared within this study to investigate the resulting properties."( Manufacturing and characterisation of a novel composite dosage form for buccal drug administration.
Breitkreutz, J; Kottke, D; Lunter, DJ; Lura, A, 2020
)
0.56
" The dosage of remifentanil in group L was lower than other two groups (adjP < 0."( Intravenously injected lidocaine or magnesium improves the quality of early recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomised controlled trial.
Cheng, W; Guo, CL; Lu, J; Qian, B; Wang, JF; Yin, Q, 2021
)
0.93
" All participants are affiliated to the French Social security system and a dosage of beta HCG has to be negative for women of child bearing age ."( Impact of intravenous lidocaine on clinical outcomes of patients with ARDS during COVID-19 pandemia (LidoCovid): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Aberkane, O; Becker, G; Chamaraux-Tran, TN; Glady, L; Harlay, ML; Hecketsweiler, S; Julians, M; Lefebvre, F; Muller, C; Muller, M; Pottecher, J; Romoli, A; Schneider, F; Tawk, M, 2021
)
0.94
" The secondary endpoints of the study include the following: Evolution of PaO2/FiO2 ratio at admission and after 21 days of treatment Number of ventilator-free days Anti-inflammatory effects by dosing inflammatory markers at different timepoints (ferritin, bicarbonate, CRP, PCT, LDH, IL-6, Troponin HS, triglycerides, complete blood count, lymphocytes) Anti-thrombotic effects by dosing platelets, aPTT, fibrinogen, D-dimers, viscoelastic testing and identification of all thromboembolic events up to 4 weeks."( Impact of intravenous lidocaine on clinical outcomes of patients with ARDS during COVID-19 pandemia (LidoCovid): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Aberkane, O; Becker, G; Chamaraux-Tran, TN; Glady, L; Harlay, ML; Hecketsweiler, S; Julians, M; Lefebvre, F; Muller, C; Muller, M; Pottecher, J; Romoli, A; Schneider, F; Tawk, M, 2021
)
0.94
"Patients receiving Lidocaine - Ketorolac combination dosage had significantly lower VAS scores, and these results confirm that local injection of Lidocaine - Ketorolac combination had a superior pain-controlling effect during the first 24 hours after the biopsy procedure in comparison to Lidocaine injection alone, as measured by VAS score scale."( Ketorolac plus Lidocaine vs Lidocaine for pain relief following core needle soft tissue biopsy: A CONSORT-compliant double-blind randomized controlled study.
Chobpenthai, T; Ingviya, T; Jaiwithee, R; Sutthivaiyakit, K; Thanindratarn, P, 2021
)
1.3
" There is still much to be understood about its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, especially with regard to optimal dosing to avoid side effects."( Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion for the Management of Early Postoperative Pain: A Comprehensive Review of Controlled Trials.
Adekoya, P; Chu, R; Greer, T; Hagedorn, JM; Hasoon, J; Kaye, AD; Odonkor, CA; Olatoye, D; Orhurhu, MS; Orhurhu, V; Roberts, J; Umukoro, N; Umukoro, P; Urits, I; Viswanath, O, 2020
)
0.94
" Baseline data with respect to sex, age, side, type of finger, donor sites, flap size, dosage of anesthetics, usage of finger tourniquet, intraoperative and postoperative pain, hemostasis effect, operation time, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) score, and hospitalization expense, were collected."( Application of WALANT technique for repairing finger skin defect with a random skin flap.
Cao, S; Gong, K; Xu, J; Yin, L; Zhan, H; Zhang, J; Zhou, Q, 2021
)
0.62
" Timing and dosing of the drug can deserve to be adjusted according to patient's needs and their sexual ecology."( Real-life use of the eutectic mixture lidocaine/prilocaine spray in men with premature ejaculation.
Boeri, L; Fallara, G; Montorsi, F; Pozzi, E; Salonia, A, 2022
)
0.99
"This study aimed to assess if a forearm (FA) intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) with a lower, less toxic, local anesthetic dosage is non-inferior to an upper arm (UA) IVRA in providing a surgical block in patients undergoing hand and wrist surgery."( The analgesic efficacy of forearm versus upper arm intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier's block): A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
Broux, V; Callebaut, I; De Wachter, G; Jalil, H; Lismont, A; Nijs, K; Ory, JP; Poelaert, J; Stessel, B; Van de Velde, M, 2021
)
0.62
"We failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of forearm IVRA with a lower dosage of LA in providing a surgical block without rescue opioids and LA."( The analgesic efficacy of forearm versus upper arm intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier's block): A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
Broux, V; Callebaut, I; De Wachter, G; Jalil, H; Lismont, A; Nijs, K; Ory, JP; Poelaert, J; Stessel, B; Van de Velde, M, 2021
)
0.62
" Hence, we designed aerosol inhalation of lidocaine by ultrasonic atomizer, to seek whether the dosage of sufentanil for intubation could be less or not."( Sufentanil EC50 for endotracheal intubation with aerosol inhalation of carbonated lidocaine by ultrasonic atomizer.
Ai, L; Liu, J; Tian, X; Xu, Q; Zhou, Z, 2021
)
1.11
"Aerosol inhalation of lidocaine by ultrasonic atomizer reduced the dosage of sufentanil for endotracheal intubation."( Sufentanil EC50 for endotracheal intubation with aerosol inhalation of carbonated lidocaine by ultrasonic atomizer.
Ai, L; Liu, J; Tian, X; Xu, Q; Zhou, Z, 2021
)
1.16
" Voluntary Paracetamol intake via drinking water reached the target dosage of 200 mg/kg in most animals."( Lidocaine and bupivacaine as part of multimodal pain management in a C57BL/6J laparotomy mouse model.
Arras, M; Durst, MS; Jirkof, P; Palme, R; Talbot, SR, 2021
)
2.06
" Reduced interquartile variation of peak plasma lidocaine levels exists when lidocaine dosing is <5 mg/kg."( LID study: Plasma lidocaine levels following airway topicalisation for paediatric microlaryngobronchoscopy (MLB).
Bateman, N; Bruce, I; Diacono, J; Doherty, C; Harrison, A; Mistry, S; Quinn, N; Walker, R, 2022
)
1.31
" The median duration of infusion was 34 [20:48] hours with a median initial and maintenance rate of 1 mg/kg/h dosed on ideal body weight."( Evaluating the Safety of Continuous Infusion Lidocaine for Postoperative Pain.
Kovacevic, MP; Lupi, KE; Schuler, BR; Szumita, PM, 2021
)
0.88
"It is clinically important to deliver a sustained-release mucoadhesive dosage of local anesthetic and antimicrobial agents for pain control."( Development and optimization of tibezonium iodide and lignocaine hydrochloride containing novel mucoadhesive buccal tablets: a pharmacokinetic investigation among healthy humans.
Hanif, S; Irfan, M; Mahmood, A; Minhas, MU; Sarfraz, RM; Syed, MA, 2021
)
0.62
"Therefore, the sustained release mucoadhesive dosage form of TBN and LGN can be an effective and alternative option to conventional delivery."( Development and optimization of tibezonium iodide and lignocaine hydrochloride containing novel mucoadhesive buccal tablets: a pharmacokinetic investigation among healthy humans.
Hanif, S; Irfan, M; Mahmood, A; Minhas, MU; Sarfraz, RM; Syed, MA, 2021
)
0.62
" lidocaine reduced propofol dosage required for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures (SMD=-0."( Impact of intravenous and topical lidocaine on clinical outcomes in patients receiving propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Chang, YJ; Chang, YP; Chen, JY; Ho, CN; Hung, KC; Lan, KM; Lin, YT; Sun, CK; Wang, LK; Yew, M, 2022
)
1.91
" The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine in reducing propofol dosage during paediatric colonoscopy."( Use of intravenous lidocaine for dose reduction of propofol in paediatric colonoscopy patients: a randomised placebo-controlled study.
Chen, C; Chen, X; Lu, G; Wang, J; Wang, Y; Xiao, P; Yao, W; Zhang, L; Zhou, M, 2021
)
1.18
"1%) were treated with at least one PHN concomitant medication, for which the number and dosing remained constant during the study."( Lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster for post-herpetic neuralgia: focus on Quality of Life, effectiveness and safety - a retrospective observational study.
Aurilio, C; Coppolino, F; Giaccari, LG; Pace, MC; Passavanti, MB; Pota, V; Sansone, P, 2022
)
2.16
" It has a narrow therapeutic window with maximal daily dosing being 450 mg daily."( Treatment of status epilepticus and prolonged QT after massive intentional bupropion overdose with lidocaine.
Robinson, S, 2022
)
0.94
"Marketed lidocaine dosage forms (such as ointment, gels, and injections) used to manage acute and chronic pain showed a short duration of action (<2 h)."( In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel lidocaine-loaded cubosomal gel for prolonged local anesthesia.
Jiang, J; Wu, H; Zou, Z, 2022
)
1.4
" The results showed that the patients in the study group had low intraoperative bleeding, short operation time, low postoperative hematoma formation rate, high patient satisfaction, higher dosage of anesthetic solution, and low dosage of lidocaine."( Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence: Auto-Discerning the Effectiveness of Lidocaine Concentration Levels in Osteosarcoma Femoral Tumor Segment Resection.
Li, X; Ni, S; Yi, X, 2022
)
1.13
"Considering the staggering global prevalence of local pain affecting hundreds of million individuals, it is of great significance to develop advanced dosage forms or delivery systems for analgesic therapy to fulfill clinical applicability."( A high-dosage microneedle for programmable lidocaine delivery and enhanced local long-lasting analgesia.
Chen, BZ; Chu, HQ; Guo, XD; Liang, L; Zhang, BL; Zhao, ZQ; Zheng, H, 2022
)
0.98
" The cumulative dosage of sufentanil in perioperative period was significantly lower (149."( Effect of lidocaine perioperative infusion on chronic postsurgical pain in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical pneumonectomy.
Ding, H; Lian, C; Lu, Y; Shangguan, W; Shao, C; Shi, J; Wang, N; Wu, J, 2022
)
1.12
" The secondary outcomes included injection pain score, vital signs, total dosage of vasoactive drugs used within 5 minutes after induction, and adverse events related to drugs."( Pretreatment with Low-Dose Esketamine for Reduction of Propofol Injection Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Fu, D; Han, Y; Jia, J; Li, W; Wang, D, 2022
)
0.72
" The amplitude and latency of MEP at T2 and T3, the total dosage of propofol after anesthesia induction, and adverse events before T3 were recorded."( Effect of low-dose lidocaine on MEPs in patients undergoing intracranial tumor resection with propofol anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
Jin, W; Liu, J; Liu, M; Wang, D; Wang, N; Zhou, X, 2022
)
1.05
" The total dosage of propofol and the incidence of adverse events were significantly lower in group L than in group C before T3."( Effect of low-dose lidocaine on MEPs in patients undergoing intracranial tumor resection with propofol anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
Jin, W; Liu, J; Liu, M; Wang, D; Wang, N; Zhou, X, 2022
)
1.05
" Decreased hepatic metabolism after resection raises concerns about safe lidocaine dosing in this patient population."( Lidocaine Intraoperative Infusion Pharmacokinetics during Partial Hepatectomy for Living Liver Donation.
Christians, U; Crouch, CE; Fernandez-Bustamante, A; Hendrickse, A; Henthorn, TK; Kaizer, AM; Schniedewind, B; Wilkey, BJ, 2023
)
2.58
" Clearance of lidocaine is decreased proportionally to the remaining liver mass, which should guide lidocaine infusion administration or dosing adjustments for patients undergoing liver resection surgery."( Lidocaine Intraoperative Infusion Pharmacokinetics during Partial Hepatectomy for Living Liver Donation.
Christians, U; Crouch, CE; Fernandez-Bustamante, A; Hendrickse, A; Henthorn, TK; Kaizer, AM; Schniedewind, B; Wilkey, BJ, 2023
)
2.71
" Clearance of lidocaine is decreased proportionally to the remaining liver mass, which should guide lidocaine infusion administration or dosing adjustments for patients undergoing liver resection surgery."( Lidocaine Intraoperative Infusion Pharmacokinetics during Partial Hepatectomy for Living Liver Donation.
Christians, U; Crouch, CE; Fernandez-Bustamante, A; Hendrickse, A; Henthorn, TK; Kaizer, AM; Schniedewind, B; Wilkey, BJ, 2023
)
2.71
" Subjects were randomized to initial dosing to a T4 dermatome surgical anesthetic level with either 3% CP or 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and sodium bicarbonate (LEB)."( Postcesarean Analgesia With Epidural Morphine After Epidural 2-Chloroprocaine: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.
Lee, LO; Lu, M; Ramirez-Chapman, AL; Suresh, MS; White, DL; Zhang, X, 2023
)
1.12
"While designed as an exploratory study, initial epidural dosing with 3% CP and beginning subsequent redosing with LEB within 30 minutes of the initial CP bolus provided noninferior postcesarean analgesia with epidural morphine compared to initial epidural dosing and redosing with LEB."( Postcesarean Analgesia With Epidural Morphine After Epidural 2-Chloroprocaine: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.
Lee, LO; Lu, M; Ramirez-Chapman, AL; Suresh, MS; White, DL; Zhang, X, 2023
)
0.91
" Larger studies are needed to confirm the findings, with accurate records of the dosage and administration route of local anesthetics."( Postmortem concentrations of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and lidocaine in femoral venous blood after hip fracture surgery.
Kriikku, P; Nurkkala, J; Ojanperä, I; Oura, P; Virtanen, A, 2023
)
1.15
" In addition, compared with saline group, the dosage of sufentanil in lidocaine group decreased significantly during the test."( Intravenous Lidocaine Decreased the Median Effective Concentration of Sufentanil for Tracheal Intubation in Obese Patients.
He, C; Jia, D; Tu, F; Yuan, X, 2023
)
1.52
"We provide additional evidence highlighting the importance of caution regarding lidocaine dosing due to the effect on seizure length in the ECT setting."( Does Lidocaine Shorten Seizure Duration in Electroconvulsive Therapy?
Enguita-Germán, M; Enriquez, ÁSR; Fábrega, AM; Gil, JL; López-Ilundain, J; Martinez de Zabarte Moraza, E; Maughan, AR; Prados, AB; Rosquil, EU; Yoldi-Murillo, J, 2023
)
1.65
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Occurs in Manufacturing (1 Items)

ItemProcessFrequency
Ointmentcore-ingredient1

Roles (5)

RoleDescription
local anaestheticAny member of a group of drugs that reversibly inhibit the propagation of signals along nerves. Wide variations in potency, stability, toxicity, water-solubility and duration of action determine the route used for administration, e.g. topical, intravenous, epidural or spinal block.
anti-arrhythmia drugA drug used for the treatment or prevention of cardiac arrhythmias. Anti-arrhythmia drugs may affect the polarisation-repolarisation phase of the action potential, its excitability or refractoriness, or impulse conduction or membrane responsiveness within cardiac fibres.
environmental contaminantAny minor or unwanted substance introduced into the environment that can have undesired effects.
xenobioticA xenobiotic (Greek, xenos "foreign"; bios "life") is a compound that is foreign to a living organism. Principal xenobiotics include: drugs, carcinogens and various compounds that have been introduced into the environment by artificial means.
drug allergenAny drug which causes the onset of an allergic reaction.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (3)

ClassDescription
monocarboxylic acid amideA carboxamide derived from a monocarboxylic acid.
tertiary amino compoundA compound formally derived from ammonia by replacing three hydrogen atoms by organyl groups.
benzenesAny benzenoid aromatic compound consisting of the benzene skeleton and its substituted derivatives.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (4)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
Lidocaine (Antiarrhythmic) Action Pathway4922
Lidocaine (Local Anaesthetic) Action Pathway3325
Lidocaine (Local Anaesthetic) Metabolism Pathway416
Lidocaine metabolism08

Protein Targets (53)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, MAJOR APURINIC/APYRIMIDINIC ENDONUCLEASEHomo sapiens (human)Potency1,584.89000.003245.467312,589.2998AID2517
Chain A, Beta-lactamaseEscherichia coli K-12Potency0.35480.044717.8581100.0000AID485294
thioredoxin reductaseRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency0.53880.100020.879379.4328AID588453; AID588456
RAR-related orphan receptor gammaMus musculus (house mouse)Potency1.49600.006038.004119,952.5996AID1159521
GLS proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.63100.35487.935539.8107AID624146
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.90930.000811.382244.6684AID686979
Microtubule-associated protein tauHomo sapiens (human)Potency39.81070.180013.557439.8107AID1468
AR proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency17.85530.000221.22318,912.5098AID1259243; AID743035; AID743063
aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.89130.011212.4002100.0000AID1030
vitamin D (1,25- dihydroxyvitamin D3) receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.00150.023723.228263.5986AID743222
IDH1Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.46110.005210.865235.4813AID686970
euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency37.68580.035520.977089.1251AID504332
chromobox protein homolog 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency100.00000.006026.168889.1251AID540317
mitogen-activated protein kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency31.62280.039816.784239.8107AID1454
flap endonuclease 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency100.00000.133725.412989.1251AID588795
gemininHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.29090.004611.374133.4983AID624296
cytochrome P450 3A4 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency1.99530.031610.279239.8107AID884; AID885
muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency21.16990.00106.000935.4813AID943; AID944
lamin isoform A-delta10Homo sapiens (human)Potency31.62280.891312.067628.1838AID1487
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit piRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.99531.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.99531.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit deltaRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.99531.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.99531.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.99531.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.99531.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.99531.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.99531.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.99531.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.99531.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.99531.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.99531.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.99531.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.99531.000012.224831.6228AID885
GABA theta subunitRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.99531.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit epsilonRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.99531.000012.224831.6228AID885
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Potassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)222.00000.00700.89855.1000AID1525553
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Potassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)193.50000.40003.92279.0000AID1307726; AID726093
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)134.00000.11007.190310.0000AID1443980; AID1473738
Sodium channel protein type 1 subunit alphaRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)56.00000.01001.14052.9390AID205273
Sodium channel protein type 2 subunit alphaRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)56.00000.00401.14854.7300AID205273
Sodium channel protein type 3 subunit alphaRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)56.00000.00600.86052.9390AID205273
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)2,188.00000.03003.73009.0000AID288783
Sodium channel protein type 4 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)2.00000.00013.507510.0000AID1069530
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)263.02700.00091.901410.0000AID392051; AID576612
Sodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)108.00000.00033.64849.2000AID288782
Sodium channel protein type 9 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)29.00000.00602.77499.0000AID1069527
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)1,210.00002.20002.20002.2000AID288784
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739
Multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)500.00000.01002.765610.0000AID721754
Sodium channel protein type 3 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)10.50000.00532.80859.0000AID1069531
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (148)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
potassium ion transportPotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionPotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusPotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion transmembrane transportPotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationPotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of resting membrane potentialPotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to zinc ionPotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaPotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
cochlea developmentPotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
stabilization of membrane potentialPotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac ventricle developmentPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
memoryPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to mechanical stimulusPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to axon injuryPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cardiac muscle cell proliferationPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cochlea developmentPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular response to hypoxiaPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA biosynthetic processPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
stabilization of membrane potentialPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
response to hypoxiaPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
Notch signaling pathwayPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
response to mechanical stimulusPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
response to organic substancePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of vasoconstrictionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
response to hydrogen peroxidePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of potassium ion transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of insulin secretionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
protein homooligomerizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion homeostasisPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
response to hyperoxiaPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
membrane hyperpolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of atrial cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
atrial cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during bundle of His cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during SA node cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during atrial cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of G1/S transition of mitotic cell cyclePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of myoblast proliferationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transportSodium channel protein type 4 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
muscle contractionSodium channel protein type 4 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium channel protein type 4 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of skeletal muscle contraction by action potentialSodium channel protein type 4 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell action potential involved in contractionSodium channel protein type 4 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by hormonePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion homeostasisPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle contractionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion import across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rateSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac conduction system developmentSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac ventricle developmentSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
brainstem developmentSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transportSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of sodium ion transportSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
response to denervation involved in regulation of muscle adaptationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
telencephalon developmentSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
odontogenesis of dentin-containing toothSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of epithelial cell proliferationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarizationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle contractionSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of atrial cardiac muscle cell membrane depolarizationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of atrial cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell membrane depolarizationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to calcium ionSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell action potential involved in contractionSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cardiac muscle cell contractionSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
atrial cardiac muscle cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
SA node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
AV node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
bundle of His cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during AV node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during SA node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during Purkinje myocyte cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during bundle of His cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
AV node cell to bundle of His cell communicationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during atrial cardiac muscle cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transportSodium channel protein type 9 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseSodium channel protein type 9 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
circadian rhythmSodium channel protein type 9 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
response to toxic substanceSodium channel protein type 9 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
post-embryonic developmentSodium channel protein type 9 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of painSodium channel protein type 9 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium channel protein type 9 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to painSodium channel protein type 9 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
detection of temperature stimulus involved in sensory perception of painSodium channel protein type 9 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
detection of mechanical stimulus involved in sensory perceptionSodium channel protein type 9 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell action potential involved in contractionSodium channel protein type 9 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transportPotassium channel subfamily K member 18Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to pHPotassium channel subfamily K member 18Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium channel subfamily K member 18Homo sapiens (human)
stabilization of membrane potentialPotassium channel subfamily K member 18Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium channel subfamily K member 18Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
putrescine transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
amino acid import across plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
L-arginine import across plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
L-alpha-amino acid transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
proton transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
L-arginine transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic detoxification by transmembrane export across the plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transportSodium channel protein type 3 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to painSodium channel protein type 3 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell action potential involved in contractionSodium channel protein type 3 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium channel protein type 3 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (69)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
monoatomic ion channel activityPotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
open rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
potassium channel activityPotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion leak channel activityPotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
S100 protein bindingPotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
outward rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
outward rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion leak channel activityPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
delayed rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
outward rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
alpha-actinin bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in bundle of His cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in atrial cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in SA node cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
scaffold protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activitySodium channel protein type 4 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSodium channel protein type 4 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
inward rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
delayed rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
C3HC4-type RING finger domain bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
scaffold protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activitySodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
fibroblast growth factor bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein domain specific bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
ankyrin bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nitric-oxide synthase bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activity involved in AV node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activity involved in bundle of His cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activity involved in Purkinje myocyte action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activity involved in SA node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
scaffold protein bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activitySodium channel protein type 9 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSodium channel protein type 9 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
calcium-activated potassium channel activityPotassium channel subfamily K member 18Homo sapiens (human)
outward rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium channel subfamily K member 18Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion leak channel activityPotassium channel subfamily K member 18Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
L-amino acid transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
antiporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
putrescine transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
L-arginine transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
polyspecific organic cation:proton antiporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activitySodium channel protein type 3 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (38)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membranePotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
synapsePotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium channel subfamily K member 3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membranePotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfacePotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membranePotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
calyx of HeldPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
astrocyte projectionPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel complexPotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium channel subfamily K member 2Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
caveolaPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfacePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
intercalated discPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
Z discPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
membrane raftPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
intercalated discPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 5Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium channel protein type 4 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel complexSodium channel protein type 4 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfacePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
inward rectifier potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
caveolaSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleolusSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
caveolaSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
intercalated discSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membraneSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
lateral plasma membraneSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
Z discSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
T-tubuleSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
sarcolemmaSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel complexSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium channel protein type 9 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
axonSodium channel protein type 9 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel complexSodium channel protein type 9 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium channel subfamily K member 18Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium channel subfamily K member 18Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
sarcoplasmSodium channel protein type 3 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel complexSodium channel protein type 3 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (538)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
AID504749qHTS profiling for inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum proliferation2011Science (New York, N.Y.), Aug-05, Volume: 333, Issue:6043
Chemical genomic profiling for antimalarial therapies, response signatures, and molecular targets.
AID23965logD (measured by HPLC) (as log k')1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 24, Issue:3
Octanol-physiological buffer distribution coefficients of lipophilic amines by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and their correlation with biological activity.
AID288785Inhibition of rat potassium channel Kv2.1 by patch-clamp method2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 50, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological studies of novel 2-aminoalkylethers as potential antiarrhythmic agents for the conversion of atrial fibrillation.
AID781328pKa (acid-base dissociation constant) as determined by Luan ref: Pharm. Res. 20052014Pharmaceutical research, Apr, Volume: 31, Issue:4
Comparison of the accuracy of experimental and predicted pKa values of basic and acidic compounds.
AID416077Local anaesthetic activity in rat sciatic nerve assessed as time required to decrease compound action potential to 50 %2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 44, Issue:2
Evaluation of the local anaesthetic activity of 3-aminobenzo[d]isothiazole derivatives using the rat sciatic nerve model.
AID496827Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania amazonensis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID275603Negative inotropic activity assessed as decrease in developed tension in isolated guinea pig left atrium at 1 uM relative to control2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-25, Volume: 50, Issue:2
Novel quinolizidinyl derivatives as antiarrhythmic agents.
AID1220559Fraction unbound in cynomolgus monkey brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID266771Permeability in human skin2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 49, Issue:13
Parallel artificial membrane permeability assay: a new membrane for the fast prediction of passive human skin permeability.
AID218593In vitro electrophysiological evaluation in canine cardiac ventricular muscle reported as % change for conduction time(CT) at 10 uM at 0.1-100 uM concentration range; Minimal (<10% decrease or increase in Vmax).1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID230041Ratio of LD50 to ED50 evaluated for its antiarrhythmic potency1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 28, Issue:6
New antiarrhythmic agents. N-aryl-8-pyrrolizidinealkanamides.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID7783Unbound fraction (plasma)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID266766Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 49, Issue:13
Parallel artificial membrane permeability assay: a new membrane for the fast prediction of passive human skin permeability.
AID497656Inhibition of mouse prion protein (89-230) assessed as inhibition of amyloid polymerization at 25 uM by thioflavin T fluorescence assay relative to untreated control2008Nature chemical biology, Mar, Volume: 4, Issue:3
Small-molecule aggregates inhibit amyloid polymerization.
AID60326Relative effect on abolition of ventricular tachycardia in dogs; no abolition of VT1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID174598Anesthetic activity of compound (0.5%) was evaluated by duration of sciatic nerve block1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 24, Issue:9
New antiarrhythmic agents. 7. 2,3-Diaminopropionanilides.
AID29925Volume of distribution in man (IV dose)2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID409952Inhibition of human brain MAOB2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 51, Issue:21
Quantitative structure-activity relationship and complex network approach to monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors.
AID680292TP_TRANSPORTER: increase in Calcein-AM intracellular accumulation (Calcein-AM: 0.5 uM, Lidocaine: 20 uM) in MDR1-expressing NIH-3T3 cells2004Biochemical and biophysical research communications, Mar-19, Volume: 315, Issue:4
Distinct groups of multidrug resistance modulating agents are distinguished by competition of P-glycoprotein-specific antibodies.
AID1130817Antiarrhythmic activity in left anterior descending coronary artery ligated myocardial infarction dog model assessed as clearing value as reduction in ventricular ectopic beat rate per min at infusion rate 0.5 mg/kg/min, iv treated until arrhythmia cleare1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 2. Amide alkyl alpha-amino xylidides.
AID540220Clearance in human after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID28235Unbound fraction (plasma)2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID59225Tested for antiarrhythmic property by measuring ability to decrease Mean blood pressure(post drug) is compared to Lidocaine using doses(3 and 6 mg/kg)1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-21, Volume: 39, Issue:13
Novel 3,7-diheterabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes that possess predominant class III antiarrhythmic activity in 1-4 day post infarction dog models: X-ray diffraction analysis of 3-[4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)benzoyl]-7-isopropyl-3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nona ne dihydroperch
AID59742Compound was tested for mean blood pressure on induced Ventricular Tachycardia (VT)1984Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 27, Issue:6
Synthesis, conformational analysis, and antiarrhythmic properties of 7-benzyl-3-thia-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one, 7-benzyl-3-thia-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchlorate, and 7-benzyl-9-phenyl-3-thia-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-ol hydroperchlorate an
AID60697% ectopic beats was measured in anesthetized dog at 0.21+/-0.19 dose; 4+/-31981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 4. 1'-(Aminoalkyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-1-spiro-3'-pyrrolidine-2',5'-dione derivatives.
AID1220560Fraction unbound in human occipital cortex at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID386623Inhibition of 4-(4-(dimethylamino)styryl)-N-methylpyridinium uptake at human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells at 100 uM by confocal microscopy2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 51, Issue:19
Structural requirements for drug inhibition of the liver specific human organic cation transport protein 1.
AID205268Inhibition of binding of Batrachotoxinin [3H]BTX-B to high affinity sites on voltage dependent sodium channels in a vesicular preparation from guinea pig cerebral cortex at 10 uM1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 28, Issue:3
[3H]Batrachotoxinin A 20 alpha-benzoate binding to voltage-sensitive sodium channels: a rapid and quantitative assay for local anesthetic activity in a variety of drugs.
AID714646Anesthetic activity in albino CF1 mouse assessed as latency in response to thermal stimuli administered as 2% solution, sc measured after 15 mins by modified tail immersion test2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 20, Issue:21
Search for anticonvulsant and analgesic active derivatives of dihydrofuran-2(3H)-one.
AID310932Permeability across human Skin2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-22, Volume: 50, Issue:4
In silico and in vitro filters for the fast estimation of skin permeation and distribution of new chemical entities.
AID1134342Toxicity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as ataxia at 100 mg/kg, sc measured up to 20 mins1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 20, Issue:7
Isoquinolines. 5. Synthesis and antiarrhythmic activity of benzylisoquinoline derivatives.
AID78122In vivo index of cardiac contractility using paced guinea pig model1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-29, Volume: 36, Issue:22
4,5-Dihydro-1-phenyl-1H-2,4-benzodiazepines: novel antiarrhythmic agents.
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1150229Local anesthetic activity in rat assessed as onset time at 2% administered as base by sciatic nerve block method1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 19, Issue:7
Oxindole-3-spiropyrrolidines and -piperidines. Synthesis and local anesthetic activity.
AID1220556Fraction unbound in CD-1 mouse brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID721754Inhibition of human MATE1-mediated ASP+ uptake expressed in HEK293 cells after 1.5 mins by fluorescence assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Discovery of potent, selective multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter 1 (MATE1, SLC47A1) inhibitors through prescription drug profiling and computational modeling.
AID218734In vitro electrophysiological evaluation in canine cardiac ventricular muscle reported as % change for the functional refractory period (FRP) at 10 uM at concentration range of 0.1-100 uM1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID467612Fraction unbound in human plasma2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 44, Issue:11
Prediction of volume of distribution values in human using immobilized artificial membrane partitioning coefficients, the fraction of compound ionized and plasma protein binding data.
AID205269Inhibition of binding of Batrachotoxinin [3H]BTX-B to high-affinity sites on voltage-dependent sodium channels in a vesicular preparation from guinea pig cerebral cortex at 100 uM1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 28, Issue:3
[3H]Batrachotoxinin A 20 alpha-benzoate binding to voltage-sensitive sodium channels: a rapid and quantitative assay for local anesthetic activity in a variety of drugs.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID373867Hepatic clearance in human hepatocytes in absence of fetal calf serum2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 44, Issue:4
First-principle, structure-based prediction of hepatic metabolic clearance values in human.
AID220937In vitro electrophysiological evaluation in canine cardiac occurred is 100.1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID1148546Drug excretion in ventricular arrthymia patient urine assessed as [2H]-lidocaine formation at 1.4 mg/min, iv administered for 36 hrs measured after 30 hrs1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 21, Issue:8
N-Hydroxyamide metabolites of lidocaine. Synthesis, characterization, quantitation, and mutagenic potential.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1148538Drug excretion in po dosed human urine assessed as [2H]-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-2-(ethylamino)acetamide formation1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 21, Issue:8
N-Hydroxyamide metabolites of lidocaine. Synthesis, characterization, quantitation, and mutagenic potential.
AID1525553Inhibition of human TASK1 expressed in Xenopus oocytes by whole cell voltage clamp assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-27, Volume: 62, Issue:22
TASK Channels Pharmacology: New Challenges in Drug Design.
AID624623Apparent permeability (Papp) from basolateral to apical side determined in MDR1-MDCKII cells2001The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Nov, Volume: 299, Issue:2
Rational use of in vitro P-glycoprotein assays in drug discovery.
AID1148542Drug excretion in po dosed human urine assessed as 2,6-dimethylphenylhydroxylamine formation1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 21, Issue:8
N-Hydroxyamide metabolites of lidocaine. Synthesis, characterization, quantitation, and mutagenic potential.
AID681153TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Daunorubicin efflux in NIH-3T3-G185 cells2001Chemical research in toxicology, Dec, Volume: 14, Issue:12
Quantitative distinctions of active site molecular recognition by P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 3A4.
AID1133883Antiarrhythmic activity in anesthetized acute myocardial infarction dog model assessed as normal ECG complexes at 0.0125 mg/kg/min, iv administered as continuous infusion for 60 mins measured during 1-hr postinfarction period (Rvb = 19%)1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 20, Issue:3
2-, 3-, and 4-(alpha, alpha, beta, beta-tetrafluorophenethyl)benzylamines. A new class of antiarrhythmic agents.
AID540218Clearance in monkey after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID220504In vitro electrophysiological activity in canine cardiac occurred is 100.1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID110154Percentage toxicity measured as convulsions.1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 4. 1'-(Aminoalkyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-1-spiro-3'-pyrrolidine-2',5'-dione derivatives.
AID87559In vivo determination of antiarrhythmic activity as the dose required for the production of 80% normal sinus beats in Harris dog1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-20, Volume: 36, Issue:17
Mono- and bis(aminomethyl)phenylacetic acid esters as short-acting antiarrhythmic agents. 2.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID59227Tested for mean blood pressure with ventricular tachycardia in dogs at a dose of 3 mg/kg expt-11987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID1223490Apparent permeability across human differentiated Caco2 cells2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Predicting phenolic acid absorption in Caco-2 cells: a theoretical permeability model and mechanistic study.
AID60112Number of dogs used ouabain induced arrhythmia1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 23, Issue:2
Mono- and diaryl-2-quinuclidinylcarbinols with local anesthetic and antiarrhythmic activity.
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID588208Literature-mined public compounds from Lowe et al phospholipidosis modelling dataset2010Molecular pharmaceutics, Oct-04, Volume: 7, Issue:5
Predicting phospholipidosis using machine learning.
AID74896Amount of ouabain needed for production of ventricular arrhythmias that causes death in guinea pig by cardiac arrest at a dose of 4 mg/kg iv given 5 min prior1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 29, Issue:7
New antiarrhythmic agents. 2,2,5,5-Tetramethyl-3-pyrroline-3-carboxamides and 2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrrolidine-3-carboxamindes.
AID317687Antispasmodic activity in guinea pig ileum assessed as inhibition of allergen-induced contraction2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Synthesis and antispasmodic activity of lidocaine derivatives endowed with reduced local anesthetic action.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID716813Reduction in amplitude of compound action potential in bullfrog sciatic nerve at 0.5 mM after 15 mins by electrophysiology2012Journal of natural products, Sep-28, Volume: 75, Issue:9
Carvacrol decreases neuronal excitability by inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels.
AID162814Duration of action potential was determined in vitro in Canine Purkinje fibers at 1 uM concentration.1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 33, Issue:2
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of aryl-substituted derivatives of the class III antiarrhythmic agent sematilide. Potential class I/III agents.
AID1211795Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 40, Issue:1
Comparison of cryopreserved HepaRG cells with cryopreserved human hepatocytes for prediction of clearance for 26 drugs.
AID1130833Toxicity in mouse assessed as mortality at 100 mg/kg, sc measured up to 20 mins1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 3. Primary beta-amino anilides.
AID60874Percent inhibition of calcium-dependent potassium-polarized smooth muscle contraction in canine trachea1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 31, Issue:11
Synthesis of (aryloxy)alkylamines. 2. Novel imidazo-fused heterocycles with calcium channel blocking and local anesthetic activity.
AID1148545Drug excretion in ventricular arrthymia patient urine assessed as parent compound level at 1.4 mg/min, iv administered for 36 hrs measured after 30 hrs1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 21, Issue:8
N-Hydroxyamide metabolites of lidocaine. Synthesis, characterization, quantitation, and mutagenic potential.
AID1133906Effect on cardiac conduction in anesthetized acute myocardial infarction dog model assessed as increase in QT duration at 0.0125 mg/kg/min, iv administered as continuous infusion for 60 mins measured after 10 mins (Rvb = 2 ms)1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 20, Issue:3
2-, 3-, and 4-(alpha, alpha, beta, beta-tetrafluorophenethyl)benzylamines. A new class of antiarrhythmic agents.
AID59377Tested for mean blood pressure without ventricular tachycardia in dogs at a dose of 6 mg/kg expt-11987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID467611Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 44, Issue:11
Prediction of volume of distribution values in human using immobilized artificial membrane partitioning coefficients, the fraction of compound ionized and plasma protein binding data.
AID1145331Local anesthetic activity in rat assessed as time duration of motor activity block at 2 % injected around sciatic nerve1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 19, Issue:4
Local anesthetics. 2-Diethylamino-2',6'-acylxylidides.
AID540214Clearance in rat after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID266769Membrane retention in 100% IPM membrane2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 49, Issue:13
Parallel artificial membrane permeability assay: a new membrane for the fast prediction of passive human skin permeability.
AID453203Lipophilicity, log D of the compound2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Development of an in silico model for human skin permeation based on a Franz cell skin permeability assay.
AID624628Drug-stimulated Pgp ATPase activity ratio determined in MDR1-Sf9 cell membranes with test compound at a concentration of 20uM2001The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Nov, Volume: 299, Issue:2
Rational use of in vitro P-glycoprotein assays in drug discovery.
AID1130829Antiarrhythmic activity in mouse assessed as protection against chloroform-induced fibrillation at 100 mg/kg, sc1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 3. Primary beta-amino anilides.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1148548Plasma concentration in ventricular arrthymia patient at 1.4 mg/min, iv administered for 36 hrs measured after 30 hrs1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 21, Issue:8
N-Hydroxyamide metabolites of lidocaine. Synthesis, characterization, quantitation, and mutagenic potential.
AID28233Fraction ionized (pH 7.4)2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID58831Antiarrhythmic property His-Purkinje conduction time(post drug) is compared to lidocaine(2) using doses(3 and 6 mg/kg); No effect1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-21, Volume: 39, Issue:13
Novel 3,7-diheterabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes that possess predominant class III antiarrhythmic activity in 1-4 day post infarction dog models: X-ray diffraction analysis of 3-[4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)benzoyl]-7-isopropyl-3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nona ne dihydroperch
AID266761Effective permeability coefficient in 100% silicon membrane2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 49, Issue:13
Parallel artificial membrane permeability assay: a new membrane for the fast prediction of passive human skin permeability.
AID1145329Local anesthetic activity in rat assessed as time duration of motor activity block at 0.50 % injected around sciatic nerve1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 19, Issue:4
Local anesthetics. 2-Diethylamino-2',6'-acylxylidides.
AID1211797Intrinsic clearance in cryopreserved human hepatocytes cells assessed per 10'6 cells by LC-MS/MS method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 40, Issue:1
Comparison of cryopreserved HepaRG cells with cryopreserved human hepatocytes for prediction of clearance for 26 drugs.
AID1069531Modulation of human Nav1.3 in open-inactivated state assessed as inhibition of inward current after 4 mins by whole-cell electrophysiology2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-03, Volume: 74Substituted 4-phenyl-2-aminoimidazoles and 4-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-2-aminoimidazoles as voltage-gated sodium channel modulators.
AID218602In vitro electrophysiological evaluation in canine cardiac ventricular muscle reported as maximum % change for conduction time(CT) at 0.1-100 uM concentration range; Minimal (<10% decrease or increase in Vmax).1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID60079Tested for Norman sinus rhythm in dogs at a dose of 6 mg/kg expt-11987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID311934Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-24, Volume: 51, Issue:2
Identification of new functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase using a structure-property-activity relation model.
AID310933Permeability across PAMPA membrane after 7 hrs2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-22, Volume: 50, Issue:4
In silico and in vitro filters for the fast estimation of skin permeation and distribution of new chemical entities.
AID60080Tested for Norman sinus rhythm in dogs at a dose of 6 mg/kg expt-21987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID60771Antiarrhythmic property is compared to lidocaine(2) using doses(3 and 6 mg/kg). Time required for the ventricular myocardium to undergo depolarization and repolarization (drug free); No effect1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-21, Volume: 39, Issue:13
Novel 3,7-diheterabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes that possess predominant class III antiarrhythmic activity in 1-4 day post infarction dog models: X-ray diffraction analysis of 3-[4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)benzoyl]-7-isopropyl-3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nona ne dihydroperch
AID266767Membrane retention in 100% silicon membrane2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 49, Issue:13
Parallel artificial membrane permeability assay: a new membrane for the fast prediction of passive human skin permeability.
AID1145326Local anesthetic activity in rat assessed as frequency of motor activity block at 2 % injected around sciatic nerve1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 19, Issue:4
Local anesthetics. 2-Diethylamino-2',6'-acylxylidides.
AID1211792Hepatic clearance in human2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 40, Issue:1
Comparison of cryopreserved HepaRG cells with cryopreserved human hepatocytes for prediction of clearance for 26 drugs.
AID119034Protection against chloroform induced arrhythmias in mice after subcutaneous administration at 100 mg/kg dose.1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 4. 1'-(Aminoalkyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-1-spiro-3'-pyrrolidine-2',5'-dione derivatives.
AID174599Anesthetic activity of compound (1.0%) was evaluated by duration of sciatic nerve block1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 24, Issue:9
New antiarrhythmic agents. 7. 2,3-Diaminopropionanilides.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID540219Volume of distribution at steady state in monkey after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID288780Effect on electrical stimulation in intravenously dosed Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as dose producing 25% increase in effective refractory period2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 50, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological studies of novel 2-aminoalkylethers as potential antiarrhythmic agents for the conversion of atrial fibrillation.
AID540221Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1145336Local anesthetic activity in rat assessed as frequency of motor activity block at 0.50 % injected around sciatic nerve1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 19, Issue:4
Local anesthetics. 2-Diethylamino-2',6'-acylxylidides.
AID1307726Inhibition of of human TREK1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in channel currents2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-09, Volume: 59, Issue:11
Perspectives on the Two-Pore Domain Potassium Channel TREK-1 (TWIK-Related K(+) Channel 1). A Novel Therapeutic Target?
AID62951Antiarrhythmic property ventricular effective refractory period(post drug) is compared to lidocaine(2) using doses(3 and 6 mg/kg)1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-21, Volume: 39, Issue:13
Novel 3,7-diheterabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes that possess predominant class III antiarrhythmic activity in 1-4 day post infarction dog models: X-ray diffraction analysis of 3-[4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)benzoyl]-7-isopropyl-3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nona ne dihydroperch
AID162809Duration of action potential was determined in vitro in Canine Purkinje fibers at 0.1 uM concentration.1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 33, Issue:2
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of aryl-substituted derivatives of the class III antiarrhythmic agent sematilide. Potential class I/III agents.
AID114213Protection against chloroform induced arrhythmias was measured in mice after sc administration at given dose.1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 4. 1'-(Aminoalkyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-1-spiro-3'-pyrrolidine-2',5'-dione derivatives.
AID19424Partition coefficient (logD7.4)2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-19, Volume: 44, Issue:15
ElogD(oct): a tool for lipophilicity determination in drug discovery. 2. Basic and neutral compounds.
AID491141Negative inotropic activity against potassium-induced contraction in guinea pig left atrium assessed as decrease in developed tension2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-24, Volume: 53, Issue:12
Novel quinolizidinyl derivatives as antiarrhythmic agents: 2. Further investigation.
AID23959logD (measured by HPLC) (as log k')1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 24, Issue:3
Octanol-physiological buffer distribution coefficients of lipophilic amines by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and their correlation with biological activity.
AID409954Inhibition of mouse brain MAOA2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 51, Issue:21
Quantitative structure-activity relationship and complex network approach to monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors.
AID218745In vitro electrophysiological evaluation in canine cardiac ventricular muscle reported as maximum % change for functional refractory period (FRP) at 0.1-100 uM concentration range; concentration at which it occurred is 100.1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID453204Permeability in human skin after 48 hrs by Franz cell permeability assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Development of an in silico model for human skin permeation based on a Franz cell skin permeability assay.
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID22283Percent change from control value for Vmax at 10 uM of the compound.1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 33, Issue:2
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of aryl-substituted derivatives of the class III antiarrhythmic agent sematilide. Potential class I/III agents.
AID23963logD (measured by HPLC) (as log k')1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 24, Issue:3
Octanol-physiological buffer distribution coefficients of lipophilic amines by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and their correlation with biological activity.
AID190113In vivo toxic dose in rotarod assay2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-18, Volume: 44, Issue:2
Medicinal chemistry of neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel blockers.
AID395325Lipophilicity, log P by microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 52, Issue:6
Relationship between brain tissue partitioning and microemulsion retention factors of CNS drugs.
AID414874Antiarrhythmic activity in ischemia-reperfusion injury exposed Wistar rat heart assessed as premature ventricular beats at 1 uM relative to untreated control2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-23, Volume: 52, Issue:8
5,7,8-Trimethyl-benzopyran and 5,7,8-trimethyl-1,4-benzoxazine aminoamide derivatives as novel antiarrhythmics against ischemia-reperfusion injury.
AID1148541Drug level in po dosed human urine treated with lidocaine1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 21, Issue:8
N-Hydroxyamide metabolites of lidocaine. Synthesis, characterization, quantitation, and mutagenic potential.
AID455986Permeability across human Caco-2 cells2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Oct-01, Volume: 17, Issue:19
Computational modeling of novel inhibitors targeting the Akt pleckstrin homology domain.
AID496821Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID8002Observed volume of distribution2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID235211Therapeutic index is the ratio of ED50 (ataxia) to ED50 (protection) in mice1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 24, Issue:7
New antiarrhythmic agents. 6. Quantitative structure-activity relationships of aminoxylidides.
AID425652Total body clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID204253Duration of spinal anesthesia at the digits of the hind limbs was measured in sheep at dose 30(mg/kg)1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 5. alpha-Aminoaceto-2,6-xylidides with functionalized amide alkyl substituents.
AID266762Effective permeability coefficient in 100% IPM membrane2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 49, Issue:13
Parallel artificial membrane permeability assay: a new membrane for the fast prediction of passive human skin permeability.
AID28757Distribution coefficient was determined1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-20, Volume: 36, Issue:17
Mono- and bis(aminomethyl)phenylacetic acid esters as short-acting antiarrhythmic agents. 2.
AID1133897Effect on cardiac conduction in anesthetized acute myocardial infarction dog model assessed as increase in PR interval at 0.0125 mg/kg/min, iv administered as continuous infusion for 60 mins measured after 10 mins (Rvb = 0 ms)1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 20, Issue:3
2-, 3-, and 4-(alpha, alpha, beta, beta-tetrafluorophenethyl)benzylamines. A new class of antiarrhythmic agents.
AID60962Effect of compound on rate of induced ventricular tachycardia (VT) in dog1984Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 27, Issue:6
Synthesis, conformational analysis, and antiarrhythmic properties of 7-benzyl-3-thia-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one, 7-benzyl-3-thia-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchlorate, and 7-benzyl-9-phenyl-3-thia-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-ol hydroperchlorate an
AID75367Percent change in the mean time to first Ouabain-induced arrhythmia was determined in Guinea pig at a dose of 10 mg/kg1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 33, Issue:2
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of aryl-substituted derivatives of the class III antiarrhythmic agent sematilide. Potential class I/III agents.
AID1150238Toxicity in iv dosed mouse relative to lidocaine1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 19, Issue:7
Oxindole-3-spiropyrrolidines and -piperidines. Synthesis and local anesthetic activity.
AID23097Compound was evaluated for -Log [fraction ionized x ED50 (protection)]1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 24, Issue:7
New antiarrhythmic agents. 6. Quantitative structure-activity relationships of aminoxylidides.
AID1133884Antiarrhythmic activity in anesthetized acute myocardial infarction dog model assessed as normal ECG complexes at 0.06 mg/kg/min, iv administered as continuous infusion for 60 mins measured during 1-hr postinfarction period (Rvb = 19%)1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 20, Issue:3
2-, 3-, and 4-(alpha, alpha, beta, beta-tetrafluorophenethyl)benzylamines. A new class of antiarrhythmic agents.
AID80315Inhibition of acetylstrophantidin induced arrhythmia in guinea pig isolated right atria.1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 32, Issue:8
Ester derivatives of 2,6-bis(1-pyrrolidinylmethyl)-4-benzamidophenol as short-acting antiarrhythmic agents. 1.
AID416080Local anaesthetic activity in rat sciatic nerve assessed as vitality time2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 44, Issue:2
Evaluation of the local anaesthetic activity of 3-aminobenzo[d]isothiazole derivatives using the rat sciatic nerve model.
AID491158Antiarrhythmic activity in sinusoidal alternating current-induced guinea pig left atrium assessed as increase in current strength at which extra beats occur at 50 uM measured every 30 mins2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-24, Volume: 53, Issue:12
Novel quinolizidinyl derivatives as antiarrhythmic agents: 2. Further investigation.
AID1133882Antiarrhythmic activity in anesthetized acute myocardial infarction dog model assessed as normal ECG complexes at 0.025 mg/kg/min, iv administered as continuous infusion for 60 mins measured during 1-hr postinfarction period (Rvb = 19%)1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 20, Issue:3
2-, 3-, and 4-(alpha, alpha, beta, beta-tetrafluorophenethyl)benzylamines. A new class of antiarrhythmic agents.
AID63036Compound was evaluated for its binding affinity towards Dopamine receptor1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 28, Issue:3
The pKa of butaclamol and the mode of butaclamol binding to central dopamine receptors.
AID204258Duration of spinal anesthesia at the weight support was measured in sheep at dose 30(mg/kg)1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 5. alpha-Aminoaceto-2,6-xylidides with functionalized amide alkyl substituents.
AID1148539Drug excretion in po dosed human urine assessed as parent compound level1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 21, Issue:8
N-Hydroxyamide metabolites of lidocaine. Synthesis, characterization, quantitation, and mutagenic potential.
AID1150237Toxicity in iv dosed mouse1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 19, Issue:7
Oxindole-3-spiropyrrolidines and -piperidines. Synthesis and local anesthetic activity.
AID1130809Antiarrhythmic activity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as protection against chloroform-induced fibrillation at 100 mg/kg, sc treated 20 mins before chloroform challenge1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 2. Amide alkyl alpha-amino xylidides.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID781325pKa (acid-base dissociation constant) as determined by Liao ref: J Chem Info Model 20092014Pharmaceutical research, Apr, Volume: 31, Issue:4
Comparison of the accuracy of experimental and predicted pKa values of basic and acidic compounds.
AID1148535Genotoxicity in Salmonella typhimurium TA-1538 after 2 days by Ames test in presence of C57BL/6J mouse liver S9 fraction relative to control1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 21, Issue:8
N-Hydroxyamide metabolites of lidocaine. Synthesis, characterization, quantitation, and mutagenic potential.
AID218584In vitro electrophysiological evaluation in canine cardiac occurred is 100.1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID1133912Reduction in heart rate in anesthetized acute myocardial infarction dog model at 0.0125 mg/kg/min, iv administered as continuous infusion for 60 mins (Rvb = 6 bpm)1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 20, Issue:3
2-, 3-, and 4-(alpha, alpha, beta, beta-tetrafluorophenethyl)benzylamines. A new class of antiarrhythmic agents.
AID127918Concentration causing local anesthetic activity in mice1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 31, Issue:11
Synthesis of (aryloxy)alkylamines. 2. Novel imidazo-fused heterocycles with calcium channel blocking and local anesthetic activity.
AID1145330Local anesthetic activity in rat assessed as time duration of motor activity block at 1 % injected around sciatic nerve1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 19, Issue:4
Local anesthetics. 2-Diethylamino-2',6'-acylxylidides.
AID1148547Drug level in ventricular arrthymia patient urine treated with lidocaine at 1.4 mg/min, iv administered for 36 hrs measured after 30 hrs measured after 30 hrs1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 21, Issue:8
N-Hydroxyamide metabolites of lidocaine. Synthesis, characterization, quantitation, and mutagenic potential.
AID1211794Fraction unbound in blood (not specified)2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 40, Issue:1
Comparison of cryopreserved HepaRG cells with cryopreserved human hepatocytes for prediction of clearance for 26 drugs.
AID288772Hemodynamic effect in intravenously dosed Sprague-Dawley rat with ischemia-induced arrhythmia assessed as dose producing 25% reduction in systemic blood pressure2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 50, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological studies of novel 2-aminoalkylethers as potential antiarrhythmic agents for the conversion of atrial fibrillation.
AID416082Local anaesthetic activity in rat sciatic nerve assessed as time required to decrease compound action potential to 100 % relative to Lidocaine2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 44, Issue:2
Evaluation of the local anaesthetic activity of 3-aminobenzo[d]isothiazole derivatives using the rat sciatic nerve model.
AID1130810Toxicity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as ataxia at 100 mg/kg, sc measured up to 20 mins1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 2. Amide alkyl alpha-amino xylidides.
AID23961logD (measured by HPLC) (as log k')1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 24, Issue:3
Octanol-physiological buffer distribution coefficients of lipophilic amines by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and their correlation with biological activity.
AID1525566Inhibition of rat TASK3 expressed in African green monkey COS7 cells at 1 mM by outside-out patches based electrophysiology assay relative to control2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-27, Volume: 62, Issue:22
TASK Channels Pharmacology: New Challenges in Drug Design.
AID1148543Drug excretion in ventricular arrthymia patient urine assessed as N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-2-(ethylamino)acetamide formation at 1.4 mg/min, iv administered for 36 hrs measured after 30 hrs1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 21, Issue:8
N-Hydroxyamide metabolites of lidocaine. Synthesis, characterization, quantitation, and mutagenic potential.
AID29812Oral bioavailability in human2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID74899Amount of ouabain needed for production of ventricular extra-systoles at a dose of 4 mg/kg (iv given 5 min prior) in guinea pig1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 29, Issue:7
New antiarrhythmic agents. 2,2,5,5-Tetramethyl-3-pyrroline-3-carboxamides and 2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrrolidine-3-carboxamindes.
AID23960logD (measured by HPLC) (as log k')1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 24, Issue:3
Octanol-physiological buffer distribution coefficients of lipophilic amines by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and their correlation with biological activity.
AID110241Percentage toxicity measured as ataxia.1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 4. 1'-(Aminoalkyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-1-spiro-3'-pyrrolidine-2',5'-dione derivatives.
AID1335249Effective permeability of the compound incubated for 2 hrs by PAMPA-BBB assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-29, Volume: 124Novel multi-target-directed ligands for Alzheimer's disease: Combining cholinesterase inhibitors and 5-HT
AID317683Anesthetic activity in rat at 1.0 uMol/site assessed as duration of full recovery of sensory block2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Synthesis and antispasmodic activity of lidocaine derivatives endowed with reduced local anesthetic action.
AID1332153Effective permeability of the compound at pH 7.4 by BBB-PAMPA method2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-15, Volume: 25, Issue:2
N-Propargylpiperidines with naphthalene-2-carboxamide or naphthalene-2-sulfonamide moieties: Potential multifunctional anti-Alzheimer's agents.
AID496832Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID655942Vasorelaxant activity in potassium depolarized guinea pig aortic strip assessed as inhibition of calcium-induced contraction at 10'-4 M2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-09, Volume: 55, Issue:3
Synthesis and toxicopharmacological evaluation of m-hydroxymexiletine, the first metabolite of mexiletine more potent than the parent compound on voltage-gated sodium channels.
AID1134343Toxicity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as convulsions at 100 mg/kg, sc measured up to 20 mins1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 20, Issue:7
Isoquinolines. 5. Synthesis and antiarrhythmic activity of benzylisoquinoline derivatives.
AID496829Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania infantum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1130814Antiarrhythmic activity in sc dosed Swiss albino mouse assessed as protection against chloroform-induced ventricular fibrillation1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 2. Amide alkyl alpha-amino xylidides.
AID58675Tested for antiarrhythmic property by measuring ability to decrease heart rate(post drug) is compared to Lidocaine using doses(3 and 6 mg/kg); No effect1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-21, Volume: 39, Issue:13
Novel 3,7-diheterabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes that possess predominant class III antiarrhythmic activity in 1-4 day post infarction dog models: X-ray diffraction analysis of 3-[4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)benzoyl]-7-isopropyl-3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nona ne dihydroperch
AID231673Compound was evaluated for abolition of ventricular tachycardia (Number/total); 0/6.1984Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 27, Issue:6
Synthesis, conformational analysis, and antiarrhythmic properties of 7-benzyl-3-thia-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one, 7-benzyl-3-thia-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchlorate, and 7-benzyl-9-phenyl-3-thia-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-ol hydroperchlorate an
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID275637Positive chronotropic activity in isolated guinea pig right atrium at 5 uM relative to control2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-25, Volume: 50, Issue:2
Novel quinolizidinyl derivatives as antiarrhythmic agents.
AID45634Inhibition of [3H]nitrendipine binding to calcium channels in Rabbit cardiac muscle.1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 31, Issue:11
Synthesis of (aryloxy)alkylamines. 2. Novel imidazo-fused heterocycles with calcium channel blocking and local anesthetic activity.
AID28983Distribution coefficient of compound was determined in octanol-water system1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 32, Issue:8
Ester derivatives of 2,6-bis(1-pyrrolidinylmethyl)-4-benzamidophenol as short-acting antiarrhythmic agents. 1.
AID680538TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Carnitine uptake (Carnitine: 0.01 uM, Lidocaine: 500 uM) in OCTN2-expressing HEK293 cells2001Molecular pharmacology, Feb, Volume: 59, Issue:2
Molecular and physiological evidence for multifunctionality of carnitine/organic cation transporter OCTN2.
AID350218Octanol-water partition coefficient, log PC of the compound2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-28, Volume: 52, Issue:10
Lipophilicity of basic drugs measured by hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
AID1133911Reduction in heart rate in anesthetized acute myocardial infarction dog model at 0.06 mg/kg/min, iv administered as continuous infusion for 60 mins (Rvb = 6 bpm)1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 20, Issue:3
2-, 3-, and 4-(alpha, alpha, beta, beta-tetrafluorophenethyl)benzylamines. A new class of antiarrhythmic agents.
AID266765Effective permeability coefficient in 70% silicon-30% IPM membrane2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 49, Issue:13
Parallel artificial membrane permeability assay: a new membrane for the fast prediction of passive human skin permeability.
AID1133898Effect on cardiac conduction in anesthetized acute myocardial infarction dog model assessed as increase in PR interval at 0.06 mg/kg/min, iv administered as continuous infusion for 60 mins measured after 10 mins (Rvb = 0 ms)1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 20, Issue:3
2-, 3-, and 4-(alpha, alpha, beta, beta-tetrafluorophenethyl)benzylamines. A new class of antiarrhythmic agents.
AID1130811Toxicity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as convulsion at 100 mg/kg, sc measured up to 20 mins1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 2. Amide alkyl alpha-amino xylidides.
AID266768Membrane permeability, CA(t)/CD(0) in 100% silicon membrane2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 49, Issue:13
Parallel artificial membrane permeability assay: a new membrane for the fast prediction of passive human skin permeability.
AID288773Antiarrhythmic activity in intravenously dosed Sprague-Dawley rat with ischemia-induced arrhythmia2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 50, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological studies of novel 2-aminoalkylethers as potential antiarrhythmic agents for the conversion of atrial fibrillation.
AID1061889Displacement of [3H]BTX-B from neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel in rat cerebral cortex synaptoneurosomes after 60 mins by scintillation counting2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 22, Issue:1
A highly predictive 3D-QSAR model for binding to the voltage-gated sodium channel: design of potent new ligands.
AID350216Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-28, Volume: 52, Issue:10
Lipophilicity of basic drugs measured by hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
AID527494Octanol-water partition coefficient, log P of the compound2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
A practical deuterium-free NMR method for the rapid determination of 1-octanol/water partition coefficients of pharmaceutical agents.
AID540233Dose normalised AUC in human after po administration2005Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems, Feb, Volume: 35, Issue:2
Comparative evaluation of oral systemic exposure of 56 xenobiotics in rat, dog, monkey and human.
AID1145333Toxicity in ip dosed rat1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 19, Issue:4
Local anesthetics. 2-Diethylamino-2',6'-acylxylidides.
AID624622Apparent permeability (Papp) from apical to basolateral side determined in MDR1-MDCKII cells2001The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Nov, Volume: 299, Issue:2
Rational use of in vitro P-glycoprotein assays in drug discovery.
AID205279Percentage inhibition of specific binding of [3H]batrachotoxin [3H]BTX) in sodium channel from cardiac myocytes at 10 uM1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-29, Volume: 36, Issue:22
4,5-Dihydro-1-phenyl-1H-2,4-benzodiazepines: novel antiarrhythmic agents.
AID1133899Effect on cardiac conduction in anesthetized acute myocardial infarction dog model assessed as increase in PR interval at 0.03 mg/kg/min, iv administered as continuous infusion for 60 mins measured after 10 mins (Rvb = 0 ms)1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 20, Issue:3
2-, 3-, and 4-(alpha, alpha, beta, beta-tetrafluorophenethyl)benzylamines. A new class of antiarrhythmic agents.
AID1145335Local anesthetic activity in rat assessed as frequency of motor activity block at 0.25 % injected around sciatic nerve1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 19, Issue:4
Local anesthetics. 2-Diethylamino-2',6'-acylxylidides.
AID58890MABP value was measured in anesthetized dog at 0.21+/-0.19 dose.1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 4. 1'-(Aminoalkyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-1-spiro-3'-pyrrolidine-2',5'-dione derivatives.
AID491164Positive chronotropic activity against potassium-induced contraction in guinea pig left atrium assessed as decrease atrial rate at 5 uM relative to control2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-24, Volume: 53, Issue:12
Novel quinolizidinyl derivatives as antiarrhythmic agents: 2. Further investigation.
AID57166Inhibition of ouabain induced arrhythmia in the dog.1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 32, Issue:8
Ester derivatives of 2,6-bis(1-pyrrolidinylmethyl)-4-benzamidophenol as short-acting antiarrhythmic agents. 1.
AID311935Partition coefficient, log P of the compound2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-24, Volume: 51, Issue:2
Identification of new functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase using a structure-property-activity relation model.
AID1134341Antiarrhythmic activity in sc dosed Swiss albino mouse assessed as protection against chloroform-induced ventricular fibrillation compound administered 20 mins prior to challenge1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 20, Issue:7
Isoquinolines. 5. Synthesis and antiarrhythmic activity of benzylisoquinoline derivatives.
AID26295Partition coefficient (logD) (HPLC)1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 24, Issue:3
Octanol-physiological buffer distribution coefficients of lipophilic amines by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and their correlation with biological activity.
AID409947Inhibition of human recombinant MAOB at 1 mM by fluorimetric method2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 51, Issue:21
Quantitative structure-activity relationship and complex network approach to monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors.
AID317682Anesthetic activity in rat at 0.5 uMol/site assessed as duration of full recovery of sensory block2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Synthesis and antispasmodic activity of lidocaine derivatives endowed with reduced local anesthetic action.
AID220797In vitro electrophysiological evaluation in canine cardiac Purkinje fibres reported as % change for action potential duration at 10 uM at 0.1-100 uM concentration range1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID1134344Toxicity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as loss of righting reflex at 100 mg/kg, sc measured up to 20 mins1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 20, Issue:7
Isoquinolines. 5. Synthesis and antiarrhythmic activity of benzylisoquinoline derivatives.
AID288784Inhibition of rat potassium channel Kv4.2 by patch-clamp method2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 50, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological studies of novel 2-aminoalkylethers as potential antiarrhythmic agents for the conversion of atrial fibrillation.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID496831Antimicrobial activity against Cryptosporidium parvum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID655938Positive chronotropic activity in guinea pig spontaneously beating right atria assessed as decrease in atrial rate at 5 x 10'-6 M relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-09, Volume: 55, Issue:3
Synthesis and toxicopharmacological evaluation of m-hydroxymexiletine, the first metabolite of mexiletine more potent than the parent compound on voltage-gated sodium channels.
AID60337Relative effect on mean blood pressure in dogs;NC = no change in mean BP1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID22280Percent change from control value for Vmax at 0.1 uM of the compound.1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 33, Issue:2
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of aryl-substituted derivatives of the class III antiarrhythmic agent sematilide. Potential class I/III agents.
AID540232Dose normalised AUC in monkey after po administration2005Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems, Feb, Volume: 35, Issue:2
Comparative evaluation of oral systemic exposure of 56 xenobiotics in rat, dog, monkey and human.
AID266764Membrane permeability, CA(t)/CD(0) in 70% silicon-30% IPM membrane2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 49, Issue:13
Parallel artificial membrane permeability assay: a new membrane for the fast prediction of passive human skin permeability.
AID114025Effective dose of compound that evoked CNS toxicity in mice in the form of ataxia1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 24, Issue:9
New antiarrhythmic agents. 7. 2,3-Diaminopropionanilides.
AID1130815Ratio of lidocaine ED50 to compound ED50 for antiarrhythmic activity sc dosed Swiss albino mouse assessed as protection against chloroform-induced ventricular fibrillation1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 2. Amide alkyl alpha-amino xylidides.
AID311367Permeability coefficient in human skin2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 15, Issue:22
Transdermal penetration behaviour of drugs: CART-clustering, QSPR and selection of model compounds.
AID1809045Apparent permeability of the compound at 50 uM by PAMPA2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-12, Volume: 64, Issue:15
Discovery of Cyclic Peptidomimetic Ligands Targeting the Extracellular Domain of EGFR.
AID226727Potency of the drug was evaluated by comparison with Lidocain; potency = ED50 of Lidocaine /ED50 of compound.1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 28, Issue:6
New antiarrhythmic agents. N-aryl-8-pyrrolizidinealkanamides.
AID540215Volume of distribution at steady state in rat after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID27368Lethal dose of compound evaluated by administering intravenously to female CRCD mice1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 24, Issue:9
New antiarrhythmic agents. 7. 2,3-Diaminopropionanilides.
AID588210Human drug-induced liver injury (DILI) modelling dataset from Ekins et al2010Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Dec, Volume: 38, Issue:12
A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.
AID288775Effect on blood pressure in intravenously dosed Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as dose producing 25% change in arterial blood pressure2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 50, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological studies of novel 2-aminoalkylethers as potential antiarrhythmic agents for the conversion of atrial fibrillation.
AID716814Reduction in amplitude of compound action potential in frog sciatic nerve by electrophysiology2012Journal of natural products, Sep-28, Volume: 75, Issue:9
Carvacrol decreases neuronal excitability by inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels.
AID59159Heart rate of the dog was measured after ouabain administration to dogs1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 23, Issue:2
Mono- and diaryl-2-quinuclidinylcarbinols with local anesthetic and antiarrhythmic activity.
AID26294Partition coefficient (logD) (HPLC)1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 24, Issue:3
Octanol-physiological buffer distribution coefficients of lipophilic amines by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and their correlation with biological activity.
AID29337Ionisation constant (pKa)2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID128835Antiarrhythmic activity evaluated in mouse after subcutaneous administration1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 28, Issue:6
New antiarrhythmic agents. N-aryl-8-pyrrolizidinealkanamides.
AID23973Partition coefficient (logD, measured by HPLC, log k')1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 24, Issue:3
Octanol-physiological buffer distribution coefficients of lipophilic amines by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and their correlation with biological activity.
AID726093Inhibition of human TREK-1 expressed in HEK293 cells by patch-clamp technique2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Ion channels as therapeutic targets: a drug discovery perspective.
AID1130838Antiarrhythmic activity in left anterior descending coronary artery ligated myocardial infarction model of dog assessed as clearing value of ventricular ectopic beats at 0.5 mg/kg/min, iv1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 3. Primary beta-amino anilides.
AID317684Anesthetic activity in rat at 2.0 uMol/site assessed as duration of full recovery of sensory block2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Synthesis and antispasmodic activity of lidocaine derivatives endowed with reduced local anesthetic action.
AID1133885Antiarrhythmic activity in anesthetized acute myocardial infarction dog model assessed as normal ECG complexes at 0.03 mg/kg/min, iv administered as continuous infusion for 60 mins measured during 1-hr postinfarction period (Rvb = 19%)1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 20, Issue:3
2-, 3-, and 4-(alpha, alpha, beta, beta-tetrafluorophenethyl)benzylamines. A new class of antiarrhythmic agents.
AID603953In-vivo plasma to lung partition coefficients of the compound, logP(lung) in rat2008European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 43, Issue:3
Air to lung partition coefficients for volatile organic compounds and blood to lung partition coefficients for volatile organic compounds and drugs.
AID416078Local anaesthetic activity in rat sciatic nerve assessed as time required to decrease compound action potential to 100 %2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 44, Issue:2
Evaluation of the local anaesthetic activity of 3-aminobenzo[d]isothiazole derivatives using the rat sciatic nerve model.
AID57523Tested for Sustained ventricular tachycardia in dogs at a dose of 6 mg/kg expt-21987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID721753Inhibition of human MATE1-mediated ASP+ uptake expressed in HEK293 cells at 20 uM after 1.5 mins by fluorescence assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Discovery of potent, selective multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter 1 (MATE1, SLC47A1) inhibitors through prescription drug profiling and computational modeling.
AID496819Antimicrobial activity against Plasmodium falciparum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID220802In vitro electrophysiological evaluation in canine cardiac Purkinje fibres reported as % change for action potential duration at a concentration of 10 uM1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID409956Inhibition of mouse brain MAOB2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 51, Issue:21
Quantitative structure-activity relationship and complex network approach to monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors.
AID58673Tested for antiarrhythmic property by measuring ability to decrease heart rate(drug free) is compared to Lidocaine using doses (3 and 6 mg/kg); No effect1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-21, Volume: 39, Issue:13
Novel 3,7-diheterabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes that possess predominant class III antiarrhythmic activity in 1-4 day post infarction dog models: X-ray diffraction analysis of 3-[4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)benzoyl]-7-isopropyl-3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nona ne dihydroperch
AID1768729Lipophilicity, logP of compound by shake flask method2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 10-01, Volume: 49Estimation of the lipophilicity of purine-2,6-dione-based TRPA1 antagonists and PDE4/7 inhibitors with analgesic activity.
AID312895Partition coefficient, log P of the compound2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 51, Issue:3
High-throughput log P determination by ultraperformance liquid chromatography: a convenient tool for medicinal chemists.
AID162812Duration of action potential was determined in vitro in Canine Purkinje fibers at 10 uM concentration.1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 33, Issue:2
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of aryl-substituted derivatives of the class III antiarrhythmic agent sematilide. Potential class I/III agents.
AID266763Membrane retention in 70% silicon-30% IPM membrane2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 49, Issue:13
Parallel artificial membrane permeability assay: a new membrane for the fast prediction of passive human skin permeability.
AID59223Tested for antiarrhythmic property by measuring ability to decrease Mean blood pressure (drug free) is compared to Lidocaine using doses(3 and 6 mg/kg).1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-21, Volume: 39, Issue:13
Novel 3,7-diheterabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes that possess predominant class III antiarrhythmic activity in 1-4 day post infarction dog models: X-ray diffraction analysis of 3-[4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)benzoyl]-7-isopropyl-3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nona ne dihydroperch
AID416079Local anaesthetic activity in rat sciatic nerve assessed as time required to decrease compound action potential to recover to 50 %2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 44, Issue:2
Evaluation of the local anaesthetic activity of 3-aminobenzo[d]isothiazole derivatives using the rat sciatic nerve model.
AID384956Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-22, Volume: 51, Issue:10
Molecular characteristics for solid-state limited solubility.
AID655933Negative inotropic activity in guinea pig left atria assessed as decrease of 1 Hz current-induced developed tension at 10'-6 M relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-09, Volume: 55, Issue:3
Synthesis and toxicopharmacological evaluation of m-hydroxymexiletine, the first metabolite of mexiletine more potent than the parent compound on voltage-gated sodium channels.
AID220952In vitro electrophysiological evaluation in canine cardiac Purkinje fibres reported as percent change Vmax at 10 uM at concentration range of 5-100 uM; Minimal (<10% decrease or increase in Vmax).1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID1130836Antiarrhythmic activity in sc dosed mouse assessed as protection against chloroform-induced fibrillation1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 3. Primary beta-amino anilides.
AID288781Toxicity in intravenously dosed CD1 mouse2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 50, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological studies of novel 2-aminoalkylethers as potential antiarrhythmic agents for the conversion of atrial fibrillation.
AID204247Duration of spinal anesthesia at the anal region was measured in sheep at dose 30(mg/kg)1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 5. alpha-Aminoaceto-2,6-xylidides with functionalized amide alkyl substituents.
AID392051Inhibition of human ERG channel in HEK293 cells by voltage-clamp method2008European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 43, Issue:11
Identification of "toxicophoric" features for predicting drug-induced QT interval prolongation.
AID106806Inhibition of malate dehydrogenase (MDH) at 400 uM2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
Identification and prediction of promiscuous aggregating inhibitors among known drugs.
AID414871Antioxidant activity in ischemia-reperfusion injury exposed Wistar rat heart assessed as malondialdehyde level per gram of wet tissue at 1 uM by thiobarbituric acid test2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-23, Volume: 52, Issue:8
5,7,8-Trimethyl-benzopyran and 5,7,8-trimethyl-1,4-benzoxazine aminoamide derivatives as novel antiarrhythmics against ischemia-reperfusion injury.
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1130839Antiarrhythmic activity in left anterior descending coronary artery ligated myocardial infarction model of dog assessed as clearing value of ventricular rate at 0.5 mg/kg/min, iv1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 3. Primary beta-amino anilides.
AID497649Inhibition of polyhistidine tagged yeast prion protein Sup35 expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) assessed as inhibition of amyloid polymerization at 50 uM in presence of 5 mg/ml BSA by thioflavin T fluorescence assay relative to untreated control2008Nature chemical biology, Mar, Volume: 4, Issue:3
Small-molecule aggregates inhibit amyloid polymerization.
AID1133896Effect on cardiac conduction in anesthetized acute myocardial infarction dog model assessed as increase in PR interval at 0.025 mg/kg/min, iv administered as continuous infusion for 60 mins measured after 10 mins (Rvb = 0 ms)1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 20, Issue:3
2-, 3-, and 4-(alpha, alpha, beta, beta-tetrafluorophenethyl)benzylamines. A new class of antiarrhythmic agents.
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1438365Effective permeability of the compound at pH 7.4 at 50 uM after 4 hrs by PAMPA2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-10, Volume: 128Discovery of 1-(3-(benzyloxy)pyridin-2-yl)-3-(2-(piperazin-1-yl)ethyl)urea: A new modulator for amyloid beta-induced mitochondrial dysfunction.
AID23970logD (measured by HPLC) (as log k')1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 24, Issue:3
Octanol-physiological buffer distribution coefficients of lipophilic amines by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and their correlation with biological activity.
AID1145328Local anesthetic activity in rat assessed as time duration of motor activity block at 0.25 % injected around sciatic nerve1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 19, Issue:4
Local anesthetics. 2-Diethylamino-2',6'-acylxylidides.
AID61925Effective dose administered intravenously to elicit Antiarrhythmic efficacy in anesthetized dogs was reported; Number of animals effective at that dose is 1.1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID266760Permeability coefficient in silicon membrane using diffusion cells2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 49, Issue:13
Parallel artificial membrane permeability assay: a new membrane for the fast prediction of passive human skin permeability.
AID197266In vivo anticonvulsant activity to prevent seizures from maximum electroshock (MES) in rat hippocampal slices2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-18, Volume: 44, Issue:2
Medicinal chemistry of neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel blockers.
AID1133907Effect on cardiac conduction in anesthetized acute myocardial infarction dog model assessed as increase in QT duration at 0.06 mg/kg/min, iv administered as continuous infusion for 60 mins measured after 10 mins (Rvb = 2 ms)1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 20, Issue:3
2-, 3-, and 4-(alpha, alpha, beta, beta-tetrafluorophenethyl)benzylamines. A new class of antiarrhythmic agents.
AID1148544Drug excretion in ventricular arrthymia patient urine assessed as [2H]-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-2-(ethylamino)acetamide formation at 1.4 mg/min, iv administered for 36 hrs measured after 30 hrs1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 21, Issue:8
N-Hydroxyamide metabolites of lidocaine. Synthesis, characterization, quantitation, and mutagenic potential.
AID60097Nature of toxicity was expressed; convulsion1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 4. 1'-(Aminoalkyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-1-spiro-3'-pyrrolidine-2',5'-dione derivatives.
AID62949Antiarrhythmic property ventricular effective refractory period(drug free) is compared to lidocaine(2) using doses(3 and 6 mg/kg)1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-21, Volume: 39, Issue:13
Novel 3,7-diheterabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes that possess predominant class III antiarrhythmic activity in 1-4 day post infarction dog models: X-ray diffraction analysis of 3-[4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)benzoyl]-7-isopropyl-3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nona ne dihydroperch
AID56538Antiarrhythmic property A-V nodal conduction time(drug free) is compared to lidocaine(2) using doses(3 and 6 mg/kg); No effect1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-21, Volume: 39, Issue:13
Novel 3,7-diheterabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes that possess predominant class III antiarrhythmic activity in 1-4 day post infarction dog models: X-ray diffraction analysis of 3-[4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)benzoyl]-7-isopropyl-3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nona ne dihydroperch
AID1321963Channel blocking activity at human TRESK channel2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 10-15, Volume: 26, Issue:20
Investigation of the structure activity relationship of flufenamic acid derivatives at the human TRESK channel K
AID311932Inhibition of ASM in human H4 cells assessed as residual activity at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-24, Volume: 51, Issue:2
Identification of new functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase using a structure-property-activity relation model.
AID111310Percentage toxicity measured as death of mice.1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 4. 1'-(Aminoalkyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-1-spiro-3'-pyrrolidine-2',5'-dione derivatives.
AID350220Lipophilicity, log K at pH 2 by by hydrophilic interaction chromatography using 100% water as mobile phase2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-28, Volume: 52, Issue:10
Lipophilicity of basic drugs measured by hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
AID1130812Toxicity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as loss of righting reflex at 100 mg/kg, sc measured up to 20 mins1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 2. Amide alkyl alpha-amino xylidides.
AID60770Antiarrhythmic property is compared to lidocaine(2) using doses(3 and 6 mg/kg). Time required for the ventricular myocardium to undergo depolarization and repolarization ((post drug); No effect1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-21, Volume: 39, Issue:13
Novel 3,7-diheterabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes that possess predominant class III antiarrhythmic activity in 1-4 day post infarction dog models: X-ray diffraction analysis of 3-[4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)benzoyl]-7-isopropyl-3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nona ne dihydroperch
AID1150233Local anesthetic activity in rat assessed as duration of action at 2% administered as base by sciatic nerve block method1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 19, Issue:7
Oxindole-3-spiropyrrolidines and -piperidines. Synthesis and local anesthetic activity.
AID1133910Reduction in heart rate in anesthetized acute myocardial infarction dog model at 0.03 mg/kg/min, iv administered as continuous infusion for 60 mins (Rvb = 6 bpm)1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 20, Issue:3
2-, 3-, and 4-(alpha, alpha, beta, beta-tetrafluorophenethyl)benzylamines. A new class of antiarrhythmic agents.
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1220555Fraction unbound in Sprague-Dawley rat brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID29423HPLC capacity factor (k')2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID205267Inhibition of binding of Batrachotoxinin [3H]BTX-B to high affinity sites on voltage dependent sodium channels in a vesicular preparation from guinea pig cerebral cortex1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 28, Issue:3
[3H]Batrachotoxinin A 20 alpha-benzoate binding to voltage-sensitive sodium channels: a rapid and quantitative assay for local anesthetic activity in a variety of drugs.
AID217929Inhibition of veratridine-induced guanidine flux in cardiac voltage-gated sodium channel (veratridine block vs. Na release)2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-18, Volume: 44, Issue:2
Medicinal chemistry of neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel blockers.
AID22285Percent change from control value for Vmax at 1 uM of the compound.1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 33, Issue:2
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of aryl-substituted derivatives of the class III antiarrhythmic agent sematilide. Potential class I/III agents.
AID540230Dose normalised AUC in rat after po administration2005Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems, Feb, Volume: 35, Issue:2
Comparative evaluation of oral systemic exposure of 56 xenobiotics in rat, dog, monkey and human.
AID59231Tested for mean blood pressure with ventricular tachycardia in dogs at a dose of 6 mg/kg expt-11987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID748681Antiarrhythmic index, ratio of LD50 for Swiss albino mouse to ED50 for calcium chloride-induced Swiss albino mouse2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 63Synthesis, local anaesthetic and antiarrhythmic activities of N-alkyl derivatives of proline anilides.
AID74456Local anesthetic activity using modification of the guinea pig intracutaneous wheal method.1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 23, Issue:2
Mono- and diaryl-2-quinuclidinylcarbinols with local anesthetic and antiarrhythmic activity.
AID91481Binding constant against human serum albumin (HSA)2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-06, Volume: 44, Issue:25
Cheminformatic models to predict binding affinities to human serum albumin.
AID491138Vasorelaxant activity in potassium depolarized guinea pig aortic strip assessed as inhibition of calcium-induced contraction at 50 uM2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-24, Volume: 53, Issue:12
Novel quinolizidinyl derivatives as antiarrhythmic agents: 2. Further investigation.
AID425653Renal clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID235615Therapeutic index is defined as the ratio of ED50(ataxia)/ED50(protection)1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 5. alpha-Aminoaceto-2,6-xylidides with functionalized amide alkyl substituents.
AID540231Dose normalised AUC in dog after po administration2005Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems, Feb, Volume: 35, Issue:2
Comparative evaluation of oral systemic exposure of 56 xenobiotics in rat, dog, monkey and human.
AID714647Anesthetic activity in albino CF1 mouse assessed as latency in response to thermal stimuli administered as 1% solution, sc measured after 15 mins by modified tail immersion test2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 20, Issue:21
Search for anticonvulsant and analgesic active derivatives of dihydrofuran-2(3H)-one.
AID1148534Genotoxicity in Salmonella typhimurium TA-1538 after 2 days by Ames test relative to control1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 21, Issue:8
N-Hydroxyamide metabolites of lidocaine. Synthesis, characterization, quantitation, and mutagenic potential.
AID1145334Ionization constant, pKa of the compound1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 19, Issue:4
Local anesthetics. 2-Diethylamino-2',6'-acylxylidides.
AID59943Tested for Norman sinus rhythm in dogs at a dose of 3 mg/kg expt-21987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID450269Displacement of [3H]-BTX-B from neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel in rat cerebral cortex synaptoneurosomes2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Oct-01, Volume: 17, Issue:19
Ligand-based design and synthesis of novel sodium channel blockers from a combined phenytoin-lidocaine pharmacophore.
AID1149685Antiarrhythmic activity in po dosed Swiss-Webster mouse assessed as protection against chloroform-induced ventricular fibrillation administered in 4% acacia1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Antiarrhythmics. 2. Synthesis and antiarrhythmic activity of N-(piperidylalkyl)trifluoroethoxybenzamides.
AID237685Lipophilicity determined as logarithm of the partition coefficient in the alkane/water system2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-05, Volume: 48, Issue:9
Calculating virtual log P in the alkane/water system (log P(N)(alk)) and its derived parameters deltalog P(N)(oct-alk) and log D(pH)(alk).
AID115266Percentage toxicity measured as loss of righting reflex.1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 4. 1'-(Aminoalkyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-1-spiro-3'-pyrrolidine-2',5'-dione derivatives.
AID1150231Local anesthetic activity in rat assessed as frequency at 2% administered as base by sciatic nerve block method1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 19, Issue:7
Oxindole-3-spiropyrrolidines and -piperidines. Synthesis and local anesthetic activity.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID781326pKa (acid-base dissociation constant) as determined by Avdeef ref: DOI: 10.1002/047145026X2014Pharmaceutical research, Apr, Volume: 31, Issue:4
Comparison of the accuracy of experimental and predicted pKa values of basic and acidic compounds.
AID527491Octanol-water partition coefficient, log P of the compound by deuterium-free NMR method2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
A practical deuterium-free NMR method for the rapid determination of 1-octanol/water partition coefficients of pharmaceutical agents.
AID57518Tested for Sustained ventricular tachycardia in dogs at a dose of 3 mg/kg expt-11987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID204575Onset of spinal anesthesia at the digits of the hind limbs was measured in sheep at dose 30(mg/kg)1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 5. alpha-Aminoaceto-2,6-xylidides with functionalized amide alkyl substituents.
AID57519Tested for Sustained ventricular tachycardia in dogs at a dose of 3 mg/kg expt-21987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID220800In vitro electrophysiological evaluation in canine cardiac Purkinje fibres reported as % change for action potential duration at 10 uM at 1-30 uM concentration range1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID1220554Fraction unbound in Wistar Han rat brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID27167Delta logD (logD6.5 - logD7.4)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID275596Activity against alternating current-induced arrhythmia in guinea pig left atrium at 50 uM2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-25, Volume: 50, Issue:2
Novel quinolizidinyl derivatives as antiarrhythmic agents.
AID1133908Effect on cardiac conduction in anesthetized acute myocardial infarction dog model assessed as increase in QT duration at 0.03 mg/kg/min, iv administered as continuous infusion for 60 mins measured after 10 mins (Rvb = 2 ms)1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 20, Issue:3
2-, 3-, and 4-(alpha, alpha, beta, beta-tetrafluorophenethyl)benzylamines. A new class of antiarrhythmic agents.
AID1220557Fraction unbound in Hartley guinea pig brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID592681Apparent permeability across human Caco2 cell membrane after 2 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 19, Issue:8
QSAR-based permeability model for drug-like compounds.
AID29359Ionization constant (pKa)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID59237Tested for mean blood pressure without ventricular tachycardia in dogs at a dose of 3 mg/kg expt-21987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID174596Anesthetic activity of compound (0.25%) was evaluated by duration of sciatic nerve block1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 24, Issue:9
New antiarrhythmic agents. 7. 2,3-Diaminopropionanilides.
AID624629Inhibition of Pgp expressed in MDR1-MDCKII cells measured by calcein-AM assay2001The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Nov, Volume: 299, Issue:2
Rational use of in vitro P-glycoprotein assays in drug discovery.
AID588220Literature-mined public compounds from Kruhlak et al phospholipidosis modelling dataset2008Toxicology mechanisms and methods, , Volume: 18, Issue:2-3
Development of a phospholipidosis database and predictive quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models.
AID26296Partition coefficient (logD7.4)1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 24, Issue:3
Octanol-physiological buffer distribution coefficients of lipophilic amines by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and their correlation with biological activity.
AID496820Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1130818Antiarrhythmic activity in left anterior descending coronary artery ligated myocardial infarction dog model assessed as mean arterial blood pressure at infusion rate 0.5 mg/kg/min, iv1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 2. Amide alkyl alpha-amino xylidides.
AID384955Intrinsic aqueous solubility at pH 10 by shake-flask method2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-22, Volume: 51, Issue:10
Molecular characteristics for solid-state limited solubility.
AID1134338Antiarrhythmic activity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as protection against chloroform-induced ventricular fibrillation at 100 mg/kg, sc administered 20 mins prior to challenge1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 20, Issue:7
Isoquinolines. 5. Synthesis and antiarrhythmic activity of benzylisoquinoline derivatives.
AID1211798Intrinsic clearance in human using well stirred liver model by LC-MS/MS method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 40, Issue:1
Comparison of cryopreserved HepaRG cells with cryopreserved human hepatocytes for prediction of clearance for 26 drugs.
AID416081Local anaesthetic activity in rat sciatic nerve assessed as time required to decrease compound action potential to 50 % relative to Lidocaine2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 44, Issue:2
Evaluation of the local anaesthetic activity of 3-aminobenzo[d]isothiazole derivatives using the rat sciatic nerve model.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1129361Unbound fraction in HEK293 cell homogenate at 0.1 uM by equilibrium dialysis based UPLC-MS/MS analysis2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-10, Volume: 57, Issue:7
A high-throughput cell-based method to predict the unbound drug fraction in the brain.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID220951In vitro electrophysiological evaluation in canine cardiac Purkinje fibres reported as percent change Vmax at 10 uM at concentration range of 1-30 uM; Minimal (<10% decrease or increase in Vmax).1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID1130841Antiarrhythmic activity in iv dosed left anterior descending coronary artery ligated myocardial infarction model of dog assessed as dose required for reduction of ectopic beats to <= 5%1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 3. Primary beta-amino anilides.
AID59232Tested for mean blood pressure with ventricular tachycardia in dogs at a dose of 6 mg/kg expt-21987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID496828Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania donovani2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID496823Antimicrobial activity against Trichomonas vaginalis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID748686Anesthetic effect in Wistar rat assessed as time taken for blockage of muscle contraction by infiltration local anaesthetic activity assay2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 63Synthesis, local anaesthetic and antiarrhythmic activities of N-alkyl derivatives of proline anilides.
AID220665In vitro electrophysiological activity in canine cardiac occurred is 100.1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID52790Inhibition of chymotrypsin at 250 uM2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
Identification and prediction of promiscuous aggregating inhibitors among known drugs.
AID74902Amount of ouabain needed for production of ventricular fibrillation at a dose of 4 mg/kg (iv given 5 min prior) in guinea pig1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 29, Issue:7
New antiarrhythmic agents. 2,2,5,5-Tetramethyl-3-pyrroline-3-carboxamides and 2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrrolidine-3-carboxamindes.
AID1130820Antiarrhythmic activity in iv dosed left anterior descending coronary artery ligated myocardial infarction dog model assessed as dose required to reduction in ventricular ectopic beats to <= 5% at infusion rate 0.5 mg/kg/min1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 2. Amide alkyl alpha-amino xylidides.
AID1145337Local anesthetic activity in rat assessed as frequency of motor activity block at 1 % injected around sciatic nerve1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 19, Issue:4
Local anesthetics. 2-Diethylamino-2',6'-acylxylidides.
AID26362Ionization constant (pKa)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID539469Solubility of the compound in PBS at pH 7.42010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 20, Issue:24
Experimental solubility profiling of marketed CNS drugs, exploring solubility limit of CNS discovery candidate.
AID539464Solubility of the compound in 0.1 M phosphate buffer at 600 uM at pH 7.4 after 24 hrs by LC/MS/MS analysis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 20, Issue:24
Experimental solubility profiling of marketed CNS drugs, exploring solubility limit of CNS discovery candidate.
AID467613Volume of distribution at steady state in human2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 44, Issue:11
Prediction of volume of distribution values in human using immobilized artificial membrane partitioning coefficients, the fraction of compound ionized and plasma protein binding data.
AID655940Negative inotropic activity in guinea pig left atria assessed as decrease of 1 Hz current-induced developed tension2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-09, Volume: 55, Issue:3
Synthesis and toxicopharmacological evaluation of m-hydroxymexiletine, the first metabolite of mexiletine more potent than the parent compound on voltage-gated sodium channels.
AID1130821Toxicity in left anterior descending coronary artery ligated myocardial infarction dog model assessed as dose required to cause convulsion at infusion rate at 0.5 mg/kg/min1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 2. Amide alkyl alpha-amino xylidides.
AID27367Lethal dose of compound evaluated by administering intraperitoneally to female CRCD mice1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 24, Issue:9
New antiarrhythmic agents. 7. 2,3-Diaminopropionanilides.
AID60426Concentration of ouabain required to induce arrhythmia in dogs1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 23, Issue:2
Mono- and diaryl-2-quinuclidinylcarbinols with local anesthetic and antiarrhythmic activity.
AID288771CNS toxicity in iv dosed Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as cumulative convulsion dose2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 50, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological studies of novel 2-aminoalkylethers as potential antiarrhythmic agents for the conversion of atrial fibrillation.
AID497644Inhibition of polyhistidine tagged yeast prion protein Sup35 expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) assessed as inhibition of amyloid polymerization at 50 uM by thioflavin T fluorescence assay relative to untreated control2008Nature chemical biology, Mar, Volume: 4, Issue:3
Small-molecule aggregates inhibit amyloid polymerization.
AID28236Unbound fraction (tissues)2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID496824Antimicrobial activity against Toxoplasma gondii2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID496830Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania major2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1130843Toxicity in iv dosed left anterior descending coronary artery ligated myocardial infarction model of dog assessed as dose required to cause toxic effect1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 3. Primary beta-amino anilides.
AID59228Tested for mean blood pressure with ventricular tachycardia in dogs at a dose of 3 mg/kg expt-21987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID151317In vivo determination of antiarrhythmic activity as the dose required for the production of 50% normal sinus beats in ouabain dog1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-20, Volume: 36, Issue:17
Mono- and bis(aminomethyl)phenylacetic acid esters as short-acting antiarrhythmic agents. 2.
AID60340Relative effect on normal sinus rate in dogs;NC =no change in normal sinus rate.1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID624626Ratio of apparent permeability from basolateral to apical side over apical to basolateral side determined in MDR1-MDCKII cells2001The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Nov, Volume: 299, Issue:2
Rational use of in vitro P-glycoprotein assays in drug discovery.
AID540216Clearance in dog after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID60348Relative effect on slowing of ventricular tachycardia in dogs;slowing of VT present1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID748682Antiarrhythmic activity in iv dosed Swiss albino mouse assessed as inhibition of calcium chloride-induced cardiac arrhythmia after 15 mins2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 63Synthesis, local anaesthetic and antiarrhythmic activities of N-alkyl derivatives of proline anilides.
AID515780Intrinsic solubility of the compound in water2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Oct-01, Volume: 18, Issue:19
QSAR-based solubility model for drug-like compounds.
AID1130840Antiarrhythmic activity in left anterior descending coronary artery ligated myocardial infarction model of dog assessed as mean arterial blood pressure at 0.5 mg/kg/min, iv1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 3. Primary beta-amino anilides.
AID312896Partition coefficient, log P by UPLC method2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 51, Issue:3
High-throughput log P determination by ultraperformance liquid chromatography: a convenient tool for medicinal chemists.
AID1133905Effect on cardiac conduction in anesthetized acute myocardial infarction dog model assessed as increase in QT duration at 0.025 mg/kg/min, iv administered as continuous infusion for 60 mins measured after 10 mins (Rvb = 2 ms)1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 20, Issue:3
2-, 3-, and 4-(alpha, alpha, beta, beta-tetrafluorophenethyl)benzylamines. A new class of antiarrhythmic agents.
AID545725Antiarrhythmic activity in aconitine-intoxicated iv dosed Ivanovas rat assessed as inhibition of ventricular dysfunction2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 45, Issue:12
Antiarrhythmic, serotonin antagonist and antianxiety activities of novel substituted thiophene derivatives synthesized from 2-amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-N-phenylbenzo[b]thiophene-3-carboxamide.
AID588209Literature-mined public compounds from Greene et al multi-species hepatotoxicity modelling dataset2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jul-19, Volume: 23, Issue:7
Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
AID220659In vitro electrophysiological activity in canine cardiac occurred is 100.1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID114662Compound was evaluated for protection against tachycardia in mice1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 24, Issue:7
New antiarrhythmic agents. 6. Quantitative structure-activity relationships of aminoxylidides.
AID58964Duration of the reversal of ouabain induced arrhythmia was measured1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 23, Issue:2
Mono- and diaryl-2-quinuclidinylcarbinols with local anesthetic and antiarrhythmic activity.
AID220499In vitro electrophysiological activity in canine cardiac occurred is 100.1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID749052Cardiotoxicity in Sprague-Dawley rat electrophysiology model assessed as QRS complex abnormalities at 10 mg/kg, iv2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 21, Issue:11
Lead optimization of 5-amino-6-(2,2-dimethyl-5-oxo-4-phenylpiperazin-1-yl)-4-hydroxyhexanamides to reduce a cardiac safety issue: discovery of DS-8108b, an orally active renin inhibitor.
AID1069530Modulation of human Nav1.4 in open-inactivated state assessed as inhibition of inward current after 4 mins by whole-cell electrophysiology2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-03, Volume: 74Substituted 4-phenyl-2-aminoimidazoles and 4-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-2-aminoimidazoles as voltage-gated sodium channel modulators.
AID59158Heart rate of the dog was measured after drug administration to dogs1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 23, Issue:2
Mono- and diaryl-2-quinuclidinylcarbinols with local anesthetic and antiarrhythmic activity.
AID60332Relative effect on exacerbation of ventricular tachycardia in dogs; Exacerbation of VT present1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID1130830Toxicity in mouse assessed as ataxia at 100 mg/kg, sc measured up to 20 mins1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 3. Primary beta-amino anilides.
AID57522Tested for Sustained ventricular tachycardia in dogs at a dose of 6 mg/kg expt-11987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID220942In vitro electrophysiological evaluation in canine cardiac Purkinje fibres reported as percent change Vmax at 10 uM at concentration range of 0.1-100 uM; Minimal (<10% decrease or increase in Vmax).1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID114458Ataxia was measured in mice after sc administration at given dose.1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 4. 1'-(Aminoalkyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-1-spiro-3'-pyrrolidine-2',5'-dione derivatives.
AID58829Antiarrhythmic property His-Purkinje conduction time(drug free) is compared to lidocaine(2) using doses(3 and 6 mg/kg); No effect1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-21, Volume: 39, Issue:13
Novel 3,7-diheterabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes that possess predominant class III antiarrhythmic activity in 1-4 day post infarction dog models: X-ray diffraction analysis of 3-[4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)benzoyl]-7-isopropyl-3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nona ne dihydroperch
AID1134345Toxicity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as mortality at 100 mg/kg, sc measured up to 20 mins1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 20, Issue:7
Isoquinolines. 5. Synthesis and antiarrhythmic activity of benzylisoquinoline derivatives.
AID220936In vitro electrophysiological evaluation in canine cardiac occurred is 100.1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID161144Percentage inhibition of specific binding of [3H]dofetilide (UK-68,798) from cardiac myocytes with blockade of delayed rectifier K+ channel1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-29, Volume: 36, Issue:22
4,5-Dihydro-1-phenyl-1H-2,4-benzodiazepines: novel antiarrhythmic agents.
AID56540Antiarrhythmic property A-V nodal conduction time(post drug) is compared to lidocaine(2) using doses(3 and 6 mg/kg); No effect1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-21, Volume: 39, Issue:13
Novel 3,7-diheterabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes that possess predominant class III antiarrhythmic activity in 1-4 day post infarction dog models: X-ray diffraction analysis of 3-[4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)benzoyl]-7-isopropyl-3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nona ne dihydroperch
AID1133913Reduction in heart rate in anesthetized acute myocardial infarction dog model at 0.025 mg/kg/min, iv administered as continuous infusion for 60 mins (Rvb = 6 bpm)1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 20, Issue:3
2-, 3-, and 4-(alpha, alpha, beta, beta-tetrafluorophenethyl)benzylamines. A new class of antiarrhythmic agents.
AID1130832Toxicity in mouse assessed as loss of righting reflex at 100 mg/kg, sc measured up to 20 mins1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 3. Primary beta-amino anilides.
AID496818Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei brucei2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID134392Acute toxicity was determined in mice1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 28, Issue:6
New antiarrhythmic agents. N-aryl-8-pyrrolizidinealkanamides.
AID59378Tested for mean blood pressure without ventricular tachycardia in dogs at a dose of 6 mg/kg expt-21987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID1130813Toxicity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as death at 100 mg/kg, sc measured up to 20 mins1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 2. Amide alkyl alpha-amino xylidides.
AID205273Concentration required to inhibit [3H]BTX binding to Sodium channel of rat brain2004Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-05, Volume: 14, Issue:13
2-Alkyl-4-arylimidazoles: structurally novel sodium channel modulators.
AID59942Tested for Norman sinus rhythm in dogs at a dose of 3 mg/kg expt-11987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID655929Antiarrhythmic activity in guinea pig left atria assessed as increase of 1 Hz-induced alternating current arrhythmia at 5 x 10'-5 M after 60 mins relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-09, Volume: 55, Issue:3
Synthesis and toxicopharmacological evaluation of m-hydroxymexiletine, the first metabolite of mexiletine more potent than the parent compound on voltage-gated sodium channels.
AID576612Inhibition of human ERG2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 46, Issue:2
Predicting hERG activities of compounds from their 3D structures: development and evaluation of a global descriptors based QSAR model.
AID220809In vitro electrophysiological evaluation in canine cardiac Purkinje fibres reported as maximum percent change Vmax concentration range of 0.1-100 uM; Minimal (<10% decrease or increase in Vmax).1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 30, Issue:12
Synthesis and cardiac electrophysiological activity of 2- and 3-[(substituted phenyl)alkyl]quinuclidines. Structure-activity relationships.
AID28681Partition coefficient (logD6.5)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID275639Negative inotropic activity assessed as decrease in developed tension in isolated guinea pig left atrium2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-25, Volume: 50, Issue:2
Novel quinolizidinyl derivatives as antiarrhythmic agents.
AID1148537Drug excretion in po dosed human urine assessed as N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-2-(ethylamino)acetamide formation1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 21, Issue:8
N-Hydroxyamide metabolites of lidocaine. Synthesis, characterization, quantitation, and mutagenic potential.
AID1148540Drug excretion in po dosed human urine assessed as [2H]-lidocaine formation1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 21, Issue:8
N-Hydroxyamide metabolites of lidocaine. Synthesis, characterization, quantitation, and mutagenic potential.
AID1211791Fraction unbound in human hepatocytes2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 40, Issue:1
Comparison of cryopreserved HepaRG cells with cryopreserved human hepatocytes for prediction of clearance for 26 drugs.
AID317686Antispasmodic activity in guinea pig ileum assessed as inhibition of histamine-induced contraction2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Synthesis and antispasmodic activity of lidocaine derivatives endowed with reduced local anesthetic action.
AID748683Toxicity in iv dosed Swiss albino mouse after 72 hrs2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 63Synthesis, local anaesthetic and antiarrhythmic activities of N-alkyl derivatives of proline anilides.
AID114641Compound was evaluated for ataxia in mice1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 24, Issue:7
New antiarrhythmic agents. 6. Quantitative structure-activity relationships of aminoxylidides.
AID63261Ventricular rate was measured in anesthetized dog at 0.21+/-0.19 dose1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 4. 1'-(Aminoalkyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-1-spiro-3'-pyrrolidine-2',5'-dione derivatives.
AID1211796Intrinsic clearance in cryopreserved human HepaRG cells assessed per 10'6 cells by LC-MS/MS method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 40, Issue:1
Comparison of cryopreserved HepaRG cells with cryopreserved human hepatocytes for prediction of clearance for 26 drugs.
AID310931Partition coefficient, log P of the compound2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-22, Volume: 50, Issue:4
In silico and in vitro filters for the fast estimation of skin permeation and distribution of new chemical entities.
AID1220558Fraction unbound in Beagle dog brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID496826Antimicrobial activity against Entamoeba histolytica2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID288779Effect on electrical stimulation in intravenously dosed Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as dose producing 25% prolongation of in current threshold for induction of extrasystole2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 50, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological studies of novel 2-aminoalkylethers as potential antiarrhythmic agents for the conversion of atrial fibrillation.
AID45741Collateral sensitivity of CHRC5 cells to local anesthetics/steroids as log of ratio of molar concentration of drug inducing 50% growth inhibition in CHO AUXB1 cells to that of CHRC5 cells1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 33, Issue:7
Structure-activity relationships of antineoplastic agents in multidrug resistance.
AID491146Negative inotropic activity against potassium-induced contraction in guinea pig left atrium assessed as decrease in developed tension at 1 uM relative to control2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-24, Volume: 53, Issue:12
Novel quinolizidinyl derivatives as antiarrhythmic agents: 2. Further investigation.
AID74038Effective dose in vivo for cardiac refractoriness (ERP) using paced guinea pig model1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-29, Volume: 36, Issue:22
4,5-Dihydro-1-phenyl-1H-2,4-benzodiazepines: novel antiarrhythmic agents.
AID450273Lipophilicity, log P of the compound2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Oct-01, Volume: 17, Issue:19
Ligand-based design and synthesis of novel sodium channel blockers from a combined phenytoin-lidocaine pharmacophore.
AID1130837Ratio of lidocaine ED50 to compound ED50 for antiarrhythmic activity sc dosed mouse assessed as protection against chloroform-induced fibrillation1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 3. Primary beta-amino anilides.
AID23971logD (measured by HPLC) (as log k')1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 24, Issue:3
Octanol-physiological buffer distribution coefficients of lipophilic amines by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and their correlation with biological activity.
AID128299Acute CNS toxicity against arrhythmogenic effects of chloroform in mice after sc administration1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 5. alpha-Aminoaceto-2,6-xylidides with functionalized amide alkyl substituents.
AID217926Inhibition of [3H]BTX binding to cardiac voltage-gated sodium channel2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-18, Volume: 44, Issue:2
Medicinal chemistry of neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel blockers.
AID114027Effective dose of compound that protects mice against chloroform induced tachycardia1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 24, Issue:9
New antiarrhythmic agents. 7. 2,3-Diaminopropionanilides.
AID23271Partition coefficient (logD7.4)1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 33, Issue:7
Structure-activity relationships of antineoplastic agents in multidrug resistance.
AID1069527Modulation of human Nav1.7 in open-inactivated state assessed as inhibition of inward current after 4 mins by whole-cell electrophysiology2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-03, Volume: 74Substituted 4-phenyl-2-aminoimidazoles and 4-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-2-aminoimidazoles as voltage-gated sodium channel modulators.
AID414872Antiarrhythmic activity in ischemia-reperfusion injury exposed Wistar rat heart assessed as arrhythmia score at 1 uM2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-23, Volume: 52, Issue:8
5,7,8-Trimethyl-benzopyran and 5,7,8-trimethyl-1,4-benzoxazine aminoamide derivatives as novel antiarrhythmics against ischemia-reperfusion injury.
AID350219Lipophilicity, log K at pH 2 by by hydrophilic interaction chromatography using 95% acetonitrile as mobile phase2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-28, Volume: 52, Issue:10
Lipophilicity of basic drugs measured by hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
AID395328Lipophilicity, log P of the compound2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 52, Issue:6
Relationship between brain tissue partitioning and microemulsion retention factors of CNS drugs.
AID1768730Relative lipophilicity of the compound in methanol assessed as retardation factor by reversed-phase TLC analysis2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 10-01, Volume: 49Estimation of the lipophilicity of purine-2,6-dione-based TRPA1 antagonists and PDE4/7 inhibitors with analgesic activity.
AID1130816Antiarrhythmic activity in left anterior descending coronary artery ligated myocardial infarction dog model assessed as clearing value as reduction in ventricular ectopic beats to <= 5% for 5 mins at infusion rate 0.5 mg/kg/min, iv treated until arrhythmi1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 2. Amide alkyl alpha-amino xylidides.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID60110Number of dogs reverted ouabain induced arrhythmia1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 23, Issue:2
Mono- and diaryl-2-quinuclidinylcarbinols with local anesthetic and antiarrhythmic activity.
AID497664Inhibition of yeast prion protein Sup35 infection of PSI yeast spheroplast cells at 200 uM2008Nature chemical biology, Mar, Volume: 4, Issue:3
Small-molecule aggregates inhibit amyloid polymerization.
AID748687Surface anesthetic effect in New Zealand white rabbit assessed as time duration2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 63Synthesis, local anaesthetic and antiarrhythmic activities of N-alkyl derivatives of proline anilides.
AID288783Inhibition of human potassium channel Kv1.5 by patch-clamp method2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 50, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological studies of novel 2-aminoalkylethers as potential antiarrhythmic agents for the conversion of atrial fibrillation.
AID60465The dose at which toxicity was measured.1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 4. 1'-(Aminoalkyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-1-spiro-3'-pyrrolidine-2',5'-dione derivatives.
AID1150230Local anesthetic activity in rat assessed as frequency at 1% administered as base by sciatic nerve block method1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 19, Issue:7
Oxindole-3-spiropyrrolidines and -piperidines. Synthesis and local anesthetic activity.
AID23494Partition coefficient (logP)1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 24, Issue:7
New antiarrhythmic agents. 6. Quantitative structure-activity relationships of aminoxylidides.
AID540217Volume of distribution at steady state in dog after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID317685Anesthetic activity in rat at 4.0 uMol/site assessed as duration of full recovery of sensory block2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Synthesis and antispasmodic activity of lidocaine derivatives endowed with reduced local anesthetic action.
AID288782Inhibition of human heart sodium channel Nav1.5 by patch-clamp method2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 50, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological studies of novel 2-aminoalkylethers as potential antiarrhythmic agents for the conversion of atrial fibrillation.
AID496817Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma cruzi2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1195137Permeability of the compound in DMSO/Prisma HT buffer at 1:200 ratio after 2 hrs by PAMPA-BBB assay2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 23, Issue:10
Synthesis of new N-benzylpiperidine derivatives as cholinesterase inhibitors with β-amyloid anti-aggregation properties and beneficial effects on memory in vivo.
AID496825Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania mexicana2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1443980Inhibition of human BSEP expressed in fall armyworm sf9 cell plasma membrane vesicles assessed as reduction in vesicle-associated [3H]-taurocholate transport preincubated for 10 mins prior to ATP addition measured after 15 mins in presence of [3H]-tauroch2010Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Dec, Volume: 118, Issue:2
Interference with bile salt export pump function is a susceptibility factor for human liver injury in drug development.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID25320Dissociation constant (pKa)1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 24, Issue:7
New antiarrhythmic agents. 6. Quantitative structure-activity relationships of aminoxylidides.
AID128839Antiarrhythmic activity against arrhythmogenic effects of chloroform in mice after sc administration1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 5. alpha-Aminoaceto-2,6-xylidides with functionalized amide alkyl substituents.
AID317688Activity at sodium channel assessed as blockade of sodium current2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Synthesis and antispasmodic activity of lidocaine derivatives endowed with reduced local anesthetic action.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID266770Membrane permeability, CA(t)/CD(0) in 100% IPM membrane2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 49, Issue:13
Parallel artificial membrane permeability assay: a new membrane for the fast prediction of passive human skin permeability.
AID59236Tested for mean blood pressure without ventricular tachycardia in dogs at a dose of 3 mg/kg expt-11987Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 30, Issue:5
Synthesis and antiarrhythmic properties of novel 3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes and derivatives. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one and 7-benzyl-3-selena-7-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane hydroperchl
AID19006Calculated membrane partition coefficient (Kmemb)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-25, Volume: 47, Issue:7
Surface activity profiling of drugs applied to the prediction of blood-brain barrier permeability.
AID1130831Toxicity in mouse assessed as convulsion at 100 mg/kg, sc measured up to 20 mins1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
New antiarrhythmic agents. 3. Primary beta-amino anilides.
AID1193161Permeability of the compound by PAMPA-BBB assay2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 23, Issue:7
Isoindoline-1,3-dione derivatives targeting cholinesterases: design, synthesis and biological evaluation of potential anti-Alzheimer's agents.
AID58612Concentration required to reverse ouabain induced arrhythmia in dogs1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 23, Issue:2
Mono- and diaryl-2-quinuclidinylcarbinols with local anesthetic and antiarrhythmic activity.
AID43581Inhibition of beta-lactamase at 100 uM2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
Identification and prediction of promiscuous aggregating inhibitors among known drugs.
AID19262Aqueous solubility2000Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-05, Volume: 10, Issue:11
Prediction of drug solubility from Monte Carlo simulations.
AID12234881-Octanol-water distribution coefficient, log D of the compound at pH 7.42012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Predicting phenolic acid absorption in Caco-2 cells: a theoretical permeability model and mechanistic study.
AID1738187Effective permeability of compound at 200 uM measured after 4 hrs by PAMPA-BBB assay
AID204570Onset of spinal anesthesia at the anal region was measured in sheep at dose 30(mg/kg)1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
New antiarrhythmic agents. 5. alpha-Aminoaceto-2,6-xylidides with functionalized amide alkyl substituents.
AID497005Antimicrobial activity against Pneumocystis carinii2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID275614Inhibition of calcium-induced contraction of potassium ion depolarized guinea pig aortic strips at 100 uM2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-25, Volume: 50, Issue:2
Novel quinolizidinyl derivatives as antiarrhythmic agents.
AID1347151Optimization of GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347410qHTS for inhibitors of adenylyl cyclases using a fission yeast platform: a pilot screen against the NCATS LOPAC library2019Cellular signalling, 08, Volume: 60A fission yeast platform for heterologous expression of mammalian adenylyl cyclases and high throughput screening.
AID504836Inducers of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response (ERSR) in human glioma: Validation2002The Journal of biological chemistry, Apr-19, Volume: 277, Issue:16
Sustained ER Ca2+ depletion suppresses protein synthesis and induces activation-enhanced cell death in mast cells.
AID1347058CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - HTRF assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID588378qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation
AID1347059CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - Alpha assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1347405qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS LOPAC collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID588349qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation of Cytotoxic Assay
AID1347045Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot counterscreen GloSensor control cell line2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1347049Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot screen2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347050Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr2) antagonism - Pilot subtype selectivity assay2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347057CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - LANCE assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID1346772Rat Nav1.5 (Voltage-gated sodium channels)1989Molecular pharmacology, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:1
Class I antiarrhythmic drug receptor: biochemical evidence for state-dependent interaction with quinidine and lidocaine.
AID1346779Rat Nav1.7 (Voltage-gated sodium channels)2004British journal of pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 142, Issue:3
Differential modulation of Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 peripheral nerve sodium channels by the local anesthetic lidocaine.
AID1346781Rat Nav1.4 (Voltage-gated sodium channels)1999Cardiovascular research, May, Volume: 42, Issue:2
Intrinsic lidocaine affinity for Na channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes depends on alpha (hH1 vs. rSkM1) and beta 1 subunits.
AID1346758Human Nav1.5 (Voltage-gated sodium channels)1995The Journal of general physiology, Dec, Volume: 106, Issue:6
Cardiac sodium channels (hH1) are intrinsically more sensitive to block by lidocaine than are skeletal muscle (mu 1) channels.
AID1346760Rat Nav1.8 (Voltage-gated sodium channels)1992Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, Jul, Volume: 19, Issue:8 Suppl
Present status of cancer treatment in Taiwan.
AID1346731Rat Nav1.2 (Voltage-gated sodium channels)1996Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Aug-20, Volume: 93, Issue:17
Common molecular determinants of local anesthetic, antiarrhythmic, and anticonvulsant block of voltage-gated Na+ channels.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID588459High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, Validation compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588459High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, Validation compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588459High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, Validation compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588461High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, Validation compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588461High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, Validation compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588461High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, Validation compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588460High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, Validation Compound Set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588460High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, Validation Compound Set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588460High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, Validation Compound Set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588519A screen for compounds that inhibit viral RNA polymerase binding and polymerization activities2011Antiviral research, Sep, Volume: 91, Issue:3
High-throughput screening identification of poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitors.
AID1224864HCS microscopy assay (F508del-CFTR)2016PloS one, , Volume: 11, Issue:10
Increasing the Endoplasmic Reticulum Pool of the F508del Allele of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Leads to Greater Folding Correction by Small Molecule Therapeutics.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (23,766)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19908038 (33.82)18.7374
1990's4858 (20.44)18.2507
2000's4777 (20.10)29.6817
2010's4501 (18.94)24.3611
2020's1592 (6.70)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 62.12

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index62.12 (24.57)
Research Supply Index10.37 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.50 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index208.49 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index3.62 (0.95)

This Compound (62.12)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials5,904 (22.63%)5.53%
Reviews1,326 (5.08%)6.00%
Case Studies2,284 (8.75%)4.05%
Observational86 (0.33%)0.25%
Other16,490 (63.20%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (1648)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Topical Lidocaine on the Cervix and Intra-Cervical Prior to Insertion of Intrauterine Devices [NCT01192490]210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-08-31Recruiting
Prospective, Open Label, Study to Evaluate VOLIFT With Lidocaine Treatment for FORehead Contouring and Marionette Lines [NCT05077488]Phase 4163 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-15Completed
The Application of Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase is Effective for the Use of Local Blocks for Eyelid Surgery [NCT02059694]0 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn
Phase 4 Study of Hematoma Block for Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures [NCT02129270]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Randomized Clinical Trial to Verify the Effectiveness of Topical Aminocaproic Acid in the Prevention of Post-exodontic Bleeding in Patients on Anticoagulants [NCT02238288]Phase 4154 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-12-31Enrolling by invitation
Anesthetic Ointment vs Local Injectable Anesthetic in Trans-radial Cardiac Catheterization: The RAOLA Study [NCT03072394]Phase 4444 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-10Recruiting
Intravenous Lidocaine to Reduce Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Improve Recovery After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis [NCT03893318]Phase 470 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-30Enrolling by invitation
Systemic Lidocaine Infusion for Pain Control in Ventral Hernia [NCT03484650]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-14Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of available resources to complete study)
Intranasal Midazolam in Children as a Pre-Operative Sedative - Part 2 [NCT02356705]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Evaluating Ropivacaine and Lidocaine in the Endotracheal Tube Cuff on Post-Operative Sore Throat Incidence and Severity - A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03563963]63 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-01Completed
The Effect of Pretreatment With Intravenous Lidocaine for Intravenous Contrast: A Double-blinded, Randomized-control Trial [NCT05143489]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-03Recruiting
Study of the Effect of Low Level Laser Therapy in the Dorsal Root Ganglion in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain [NCT02529670]31 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
Treatment of Postoperative Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in Combination With Patient Controlled Analgesia: a Prospective Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Study [NCT01108562]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Withdrawn
Platelet Rich Plasma Injection Compared to Corticosteroid Injection for Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis. A Prospective, Randomized Control Trial [NCT01127672]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Withdrawn
Efficacy of the Application of Xylocaine Impregnated Compress in Reducing Per-procedural Pain During Ultrasound-guided Infiltration of Trigger Finger: a Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Study (SAUTYLO) [NCT05032508]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-07Recruiting
The Efficacy of Bupivacaine Alone and in Combination With Lidocaine at Performing Caudal Block on Analgesia in Pediatric Patients Underwent Circumcision: A Historical Cohort Study [NCT03911648]86 participants (Actual)Observational2018-07-01Completed
Restoration of Bowel Function After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine [NCT01155440]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Continuous Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block for Open Radical Prostatectomy. A Double Blind Randomized Study. [NCT01157546]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Low recruitment rate. In our center, open radical prostatectomies have been almost completely replaced by robotic prostatectomies.)
Lidocaine 5% Medicated Plaster for the Topical Treatment of Localized Chronic Postoperative Neuropathic Pain. [NCT01155986]Phase 274 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Trial was stopped due to difficult enrolment)
Influence of Lidocaine on a Closed-Loop Anesthesia System [NCT01154738]Phase 382 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
The Effect of Intraurethral Lidocaine Gel in Comparison With Plain Lubricating Gel on Pain Perception During Flexible Cystoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Study [NCT03874364]280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-01Recruiting
Comparing the Efficacy of Local Anesthetics in Mohs Surgery [NCT03871478]105 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-01Recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Topical Pharyngeal Anaesthesia Using 5 vs 10 Sprays of 10% Lignocaine During Flexible Bronchoscopy [NCT03869528]300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-01Recruiting
Contribution of Urethral Sensory Feedback in Voiding Efficiency [NCT03637582]18 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-26Completed
Nitrous Oxide for Analgesia During Office Urethral Bulking: a Randomized, Controlled Trial [NCT03847922]Phase 42 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-15Terminated(stopped due to Due to staffing changes in the hospital, we will be unable to complete this study for the requested 84 subjects. As such, we have decided to close this study.)
Feasibility of Phrenic Nerve Block to Mitigate Self-inflicted Lung Injury in ARF Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation on Spontaneous Breathing [NCT03978845]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-15Completed
Phase 2 Study of Dextrose Injection for Sport-Limiting Osgood Schlatter Disease in Adolescents. [NCT01300754]Phase 1/Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Effect of Lidocaine 1% and 2% in the Endotracheal Tube Cuff on Postoperative Sore Throat and Cough [NCT03792776]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-31Not yet recruiting
Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Combined With Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy [NCT03788018]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-01Completed
Effect of Preoperative Nebulized Lidocaine on Postoperative Sore Throat After Endotracheal Intubation [NCT03779516]110 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-19Terminated(stopped due to change in procedure)
Lidocaine Infusions for Children Undergoing Combined Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial [NCT03902314]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-07Completed
A Comparative Study Between Lumbar Epidural Analgesia Versus Local Analgesia With Dexmedetomidine Infusion in Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy [NCT05850455]78 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-05-20Completed
Suprascapular Nerve Block for Treatment of Shoulder Pain in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injuries [NCT05364099]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-11-27Withdrawn(stopped due to Unable to feasibly complete study.)
SMILE Study: Effectiveness and Safety of STYLAGE® M Lidocaïne for Lips' Volume Augmentation and/or Redefinition of the Outline of the Lips [NCT04813614]92 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-31Completed
Estimation of the Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on BIS-guided Propofol Requirements During General Anesthesia [NCT01366300]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Randomised, Evaluator-blind Comparative Study to Evaluate Performance and Safety of Restylane Lidocaine and No-treatment Control for Treatment of Depressed Facial Acne Scars [NCT03127384]Phase 449 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-20Completed
LIPS: A Prospective, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine for Lip Augmentation [NCT03796728]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-19Completed
Evaluation of Predictors of Response for the Efficacy of Topical Lidocaine Patch (Versatis) on Chronic Neuropathic Pain After Peripheral Nerve Injury [NCT01112748]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Comparison of Axillary Block Under Ultrasound With 40 or 25 ml of Xylocaine 1.5% Adrenalin in Forearm or Arm Surgery. [NCT01216488]Phase 372 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Comparison of Two Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine Added to Lignocaine in Patients Posted for Upper Limb Orthopedic Surgery Under Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia [NCT05123170]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-28Completed
Double Blinded Prospective Pilot Study to Determine the Safety and Effectiveness of a Connective Tissue Allograft (ActiveMatrix) vs. Standard of Care in Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder [NCT05844930]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-03Recruiting
Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of the Combination of ROpivacaine With Reference XYlocaine in the Evaluation of Pain During the Installation of Percutaneous Radiological GASTrostomy [NCT04250805]Phase 2124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-27Recruiting
A Comparison of the Efficacy of 5% Lidocaine Anesthetic to Provide SPGB Vs. Elavil for the Treatment of Transformed Migraine [NCT02090998]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Terminated(stopped due to no patients during covid pandemic)
Impact of Lidocaine on Anesthetic Depth During Rapid Sequence Induction [NCT01238718]76 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Saline Injection - Assisted Anesthesia in Eyelid Surgery [NCT01239498]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-11-30Recruiting
Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Pain Relief in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT03886896]Phase 474 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-22Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Prilocaine 2% and Lidocaine 5% Hyperbaric Against Spinal Anesthesia in Post Cystoscopy Procedure [NCT05834647]Phase 445 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-01Not yet recruiting
Safety Profile of IntRAvenous Lidocaine Use in Coelioscopic Bariatric Surgery [NCT02525016]Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Bupivacaine Versus Lidocaine Infiltration for Postoperative Pain in Thyroid Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04427904]Phase 2210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-01Recruiting
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Three-way Cross-over Single Center Study to Characterize the Phenotype in Patients With Morton's Neuroma and to Explore the Effect of Local Administration of Xylocaine (Lidocaine) [NCT01298310]Early Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Effect of Regional Anesthesia With Lidocaine on Perioperative Levels of Interleukin-1β, Interleukin-6 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α in Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid in Cerebral Aneurysm Patients [NCT03823482]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-01Enrolling by invitation
Lidocaine-Prilocaine (EMLA) Cream as Analgesia in Hysterosalpingography Practice: a Prospective Randomized Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial [NCT01303614]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-04-30Not yet recruiting
VERSATIS - Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine 5% Plasters (Versatis® 5%) in Child, Adolescents and Young Adults With Neuropathic Pains or Vasoocclusive Sickle Cell Crisis Pains [NCT01314300]Phase 239 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Recombinant Bovine Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor for the Treatment of Radiation Induced Oral Mucositis:An Open, Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Study [NCT03778008]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-21Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Control Trial of Intravenous Lidocaine for the Management of Traumatic Rib Fractures: a Single Trauma Centre Trial [NCT03770208]26 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-06Recruiting
A Comparison the Effectiveness of Anesthesia With Lidocaine 2% or Articaine 4% in Children With Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation (MIH) [NCT05200884]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-22Completed
Physiotherapy Alone, in Combination With Corticosteroid Injection or Wait-and-see for Acute Lateral Epicondylitis in General Practice: a Randomised, Placebo-controlled Study With 12 Months Follow-up [NCT00826462]Phase 4177 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Post-cesarean Analgesia With Epidural Morphine Following Epidural 2-chloroprocaine [NCT04369950]Phase 444 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-11Completed
Lidocaine Compared to Magnesium Sulfate to Prolong Spinal Anesthesia: Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03725228]Phase 444 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-07Completed
A Comparison of the Efficacy of Ablative Fractional Laser-assisted Photodynamic Therapy According to the Density of Ablative Laser Channel in the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis [NCT03731988]Phase 447 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-01Completed
Effect of a Vibration System on Pain Reduction During Injection of Local Dental Anaesthesia in Children: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT03953001]51 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-01Completed
Pain Control in Pediatric Oncology: Utility of EMLA Cream vs Lidocaine Injection in Lumbar Punctures [NCT04003012]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-19Completed
Double-blind, Prospective Comparison of Medications Used in Trigger Point Injections - Ketorolac, Lidocaine, or Dexamethasone [NCT03028012]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-02Terminated(stopped due to Poor enrollment.)
A Randomized, Multicenter, No-treatment Controlled Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA® With Lidocaine for Lip Enhancement in Chinese Adults [NCT03519204]176 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-28Completed
Opioid-Free Shoulder Arthroplasty [NCT03540030]Phase 486 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
Randomized, Placebo-controlled Crossover Trial Evaluating Topical Lidocaine Patch(es) for Mechanical Neck Pain. [NCT04378959]76 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-01Completed
Anesthesia With Peribulbar Block: Lidocaine-bupivacaine vs Lidocaine-bupivacaine-fentanyl [NCT03713762]Phase 370 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-01Completed
Optimizing Topical Pain Control for Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Pre-operative Radiotracer Injection for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping [NCT04822597]Phase 3167 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-23Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Split-Face Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Revanesse® Ultra + (With Lidocaine) Versus Revanesse® Ultra for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds (NLF) [NCT02991040]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety in Chinese Children [NCT03653260]Phase 3288 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-15Completed
Long Term Safety and Efficacy Assessment of Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler With for the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds [NCT02703740]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-11Completed
The Effectiveness of Topical Lidocaine in Relieving Pain Related To Intranasal Midazolam Sedation: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT03725995]Phase 2/Phase 363 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-01Completed
The Comparison of Lateral Sagittal vs Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Children [NCT04215614]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-02Completed
Treatment of Postoperative Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in Combination With Patient Controlled Analgesia Versus Continuous Femoral Block Catheter in Combination With Patient Controlled Analgesia: A Prospective, R [NCT00616850]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Orthopedic surgeon that does our knee surgeries moved to a different location)
The Feasibility and Advantages of Painless Indwelling Catheter in Uniportal Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy of Lung Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study [NCT03621514]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-01Recruiting
Prospective Study of Liposomal Bupivacaine for Pain Control of Split Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites [NCT03854344]Phase 475 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-18Recruiting
Formulations of Liposomal Local Anesthetics for Dental Anesthesia [NCT01307969]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Intravenous Lidocaine for Perioperative and Postoperative Analgesia [NCT03921567]Phase 4520 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-15Recruiting
Lidocaine as an Adjuvant for Ketamine in Induction of Anesthesia in Septic Shock Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03640468]Phase 336 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-20Not yet recruiting
Cryoanesthesia for Intravitreal Injections [NCT02872012]Phase 1/Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Self-administered Lidocaine Gel for Pain-control During Cervical Preparation for Dilation and Evacuation: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02852434]Phase 372 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
Intranasal Lidocaine to Treat Pediatric Migraine in the Emergency Department [NCT03576820]Phase 350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-15Recruiting
A Two-Period Crossover Study to Compare the Systemic Exposure to Trans-Capsaicin and Cis-Capsaicin From an Intra-Articular Injection of CNTX-4975-05 (Trans-capsaicin for Injection) and Topical 8% Capsaicin Patch (Qutenza®) in Subjects With Painful Knee Os [NCT03576508]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-25Completed
Pain During Pars Plana Vitrectomy Comparing Peribulbar Anesthesia Versus Sub-tenon Injection Plus Topical Jelly Anesthesia [NCT03902925]Phase 1/Phase 256 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-01Completed
Efficacy of Tumescent Local Anesthesia in the Surgical Management of Tenosynovitis. [NCT03914235]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-01Completed
10% Lidocaine Spray for Pain Control During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT03870711]Phase 4124 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-01Completed
Is Lidocaine Really Guilty? A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind Comparison of the Incidence of TNS After Intrathecal Lidocaine Administration vs. Intrathecal Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia [NCT03862287]160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-01Recruiting
Efficacy of Post-FESS Implantation of Composite Removable Sinus Stent System to Prevent Post-Operative Complications and Revision Surgery [NCT02812199]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-08-31Recruiting
The Prevention of Pain Associated With Rocuronium Injection: Effect of Pretreatment With Acetaminophen and Lidocaine [NCT02524743]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Bacteriostatic Saline as a Local Anesthetic in Minor Eyelid Procedures [NCT05294640]Phase 495 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-05-17Completed
A Comparison of Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks Versus Continuous Intravenous Lidocaine for Kidney Transplant Surgery [NCT03843879]Phase 2/Phase 3124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-01Recruiting
Evaluation of the Benefit of Lidocaine on the Prevention of the Risk of Post Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-pancreatography Pancreatitis. [NCT05667987]1,800 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-01Not yet recruiting
Pretreatment of Lacerations With Topical LET (Lidocaine-Epinephrine-Tetracaine) Reduces Pain During Tissue Adhesive Repair in Children: Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Efficacy [NCT01202487]Phase 2222 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Absolute Bioavailability/Pharmacokinetic and Residual Drug Analysis of Topical Lidocaine in Healthy Adults [NCT03310970]Phase 423 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-14Completed
A Muticenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of a Single-Dose of COL-1077 in Women Undergoing Transvaginal Pipelle-Directed Endometrial Biopsy [NCT02465320]Phase 2187 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Comparison of Amitriptyline and Nerve Blocks (GON and SON) in Patients With Migraine [NCT04750967]57 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-03Completed
The Effect of Lidocaine - Prilocaine Cream (EMLA) Versus Mepivacaine Infiltration on Pain Relief During And After Mediolateral Episiotomies: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03264586]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-31Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block With Modulation of Depth of Anesthesia on Prognosis of Patients Receiving Total Knee Arthroplasty [NCT02576015]380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-03-31Not yet recruiting
Topical Lidocaine 2% Gel for Analgesia and Patient Comfort During Interscalene Brachial Plexus and Axillary Blocks: A Noninferiority Randomized Trial [NCT03206320]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-05Active, not recruiting
Intra-articular Lidocaine vs Procedural Sedation for Anterior Shoulder Dislocations [NCT03625076]Phase 470 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-01Recruiting
Improving Patient Outcomes With Inguinal Hernioplasty - a Randomized Controlled Trial of Local Anaesthesia Versus Local Anaesthesia and Conscious Sedation [NCT02444260]Phase 3180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-12-31Recruiting
The Effect of Intrauterine Lidocaine Infusion and Oral Tramadol on Pain During Diagnostic Office Hysteroscopy in Postmenopausal Women: Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study [NCT03701984]Phase 4156 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-15Completed
Intravenous Lidocaine for Effective Pain Relief After Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study [NCT01319682]Phase 454 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine, Used to Attenuate Pain With Propofol Injection, on Defibrillation Threshold Testing [NCT03117166]Phase 1/Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Terminated(stopped due to multidisciplinary participation could not be overcome.)
Multicentre, Double-Blind Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lambdalina vs Placebo as an Anesthetic for Laser Hair Removal [NCT01360749]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
A Multicenter, Active-controlled, Randomized, Evaluator and Subject Blinded, Split-face, Comparative, Non-inferiority and Confirmatory Clinical Study of the Efficacy and Safety Between YYD701-2 and Restylane Perlane Lidocaine for Temporary Correction of M [NCT03170050]Phase 3107 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-01Completed
Narcotrend Versus Bispectral Index Monitoring During Sufentanil-Midazolam Anesthesia for Bronchoscopy Under Conscious Sedation [NCT03738137]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-01Completed
to Evaluate the Efficacy of Prolotherapy Treatment and Compare the Control Group in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis: a Randomized Double-blind Study [NCT03731897]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-12Completed
Efficiency of Intravenous Lidocaine to Reduce Coughing and the Hemodynamic Changes Associated to Tracheal Extubation [NCT03731429]Phase 4144 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-05Recruiting
Pilot Study: Measurement of Plasma Levels of Lidocaine/Tetracaine and Adverse Effects Derived From a New Topical Formulation for Treatment of Neuropathic Pain [NCT06171243]20 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-03-17Recruiting
Lidocaine for Pessary Removal and Reinsertion Pain Reduction [NCT05493735]Phase 366 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-09-08Completed
Clinical Assessment of the Treatment With Cardiac Sympathetic Blockade on Chronic Heart Failure [NCT02391142]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-06-30Recruiting
Assessment of Tetracycline Pleurodesis in Prevention of Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax Recurrence in Patients With Normal CT-scan [NCT03634605]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-05Completed
Pilot Study: Comparison of Buffered 1% vs. Unbuffered 2% Lidocaine in Pediatric Subjects; Clinical Outcomes [NCT03562481]Phase 426 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-24Completed
Comparison Between 2% Lidocaine Gel and 5% Tetracaine Eye Drop as Topical Anesthesia in Phacoemulsification [NCT03143452]72 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-01Completed
Lidocaine 5% Patch (Lidoderm) for the Perioperative Prevention of Acute and Chronic Chest Pain Following Robotic Valve Surgery [NCT03120351]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
The Effectiveness of Ozone (O2-O3) Injections in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study [NCT04885881]46 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-15Completed
Treatment of Headache With Occipital Nerve Blocks: Comparison Trial of Anesthetic With or Without Dexamethasone [NCT05732532]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-17Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind Study Comparing 3% Chloroprocaine Versus 2 % Lidocaine/ Epinephrine/ Bicarbonate/ Fentanyl for Epidural Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Delivery [NCT03414359]Early Phase 170 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-15Completed
Comparison of Continuous Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion Versus ESP Block for Rib Fracture Analgesia [NCT04707183]Phase 2160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-03-31Not yet recruiting
Accelerated Recovery Following Opioid-free Anaesthesia in Supratentorial Craniotomy [NCT05681429]44 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-01Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Opioid-free Anesthesia Using Dexmedetomidine-lidocaine on Acute Postoperative Pain in Gynecological Laparoscopy [NCT04906889]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-01Withdrawn(stopped due to financial protocol)
The Effect of Perioperative Lidocaine Intravenous Infusion on Neutrophil Extracellular Trapping After Surgery for Stomach Cancer [NCT04868747]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-01Withdrawn(stopped due to due to financial problem)
Analgesic Efficacy of Echoguided Maxillary and Mandibular Nerve Blocks in Planned Maxillomandibular Osteotomy Surgery [NCT05351151]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-23Recruiting
Intraoperative Use of Lidocaine and Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [NCT03620591]98 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-02Completed
"Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Injection in Reducing Limb Pain in Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome" [NCT03616262]Early Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-07-31Recruiting
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Eutectic Lidocaine/Prilocaine Cream 5% (EMLA) for Analgesia Prior to Cryotherapy of Verrucae Plantaris in Adults [NCT01330615]64 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-02-28Recruiting
A Comparison of Lidocaine Versus Ropivacaine for Bilateral Continuous Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Blocks for Post-bowel Surgery Analgesia [NCT02849678]68 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Pretreatment With Topical Anesthesia or Decongestant for Reducing Pain and Discomfort During Fiberoptic Nasal Pharyngoscopy and Laryngoscopy: A Double Blind Randomized Study [NCT03620513]Phase 4160 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-01Completed
Radiesse® Post Approval Safety Study For the Treatment of Hands With Moderate to Very Severe Dorsal Volume Loss [NCT02904096]256 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-10Completed
A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded, Within-subject (Split-face), Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study to Compare the Level of Pain Using the Dermal Filler RHA® 4 Formulated With Two Different Anesthetics in the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds [NCT04087395]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-30Completed
A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED TRIAL ASSESSING THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN TYPE OF LOCAL ANESTHESIA TREATMENT AND POSTOPERATIVE PAIN IN PATIENTS IN HAVING UNDERGONE ARRHYTHMIA SURGERY [NCT01300377]300 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Efficacy of Lidocaine Gel Enema After Endoscopic Hemorrhoid Band Ligation for Relief of Post Procedural Pain [NCT03797703]Phase 175 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-26Completed
Tranversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block vs. Systemic Lidocaine to Improve Quality of Recovery After Outpatient Laparoscopic Surgery: A Non-inferiority, Randomized, Double Blinded, Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT02053558]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-03Withdrawn(stopped due to Could not obtain dedicated ultrasound device.)
Lidocaine Injection Versus Sham Needling in Treating Whiplash Associated disorder-a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02060734]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to no participant recruited)
Injectable Lidocaine Provides Similar Analgesia Compared to Transdermal Lidocaine/Tetracaine Patch for the Incision and Drainage of Skin Abscesses: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02066818]Early Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Effectiveness of Triamcinolone Hexacetonide Intra-articular Injection in Interphalangeal Joints: a 12 Weeks Randomized Controlled Trial in Osteoarthritis Hand Patients [NCT02102620]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Efficacy of 4% Articaine Terminal Anesthesia in the Lateral Jaw Region in Children: A Double-blind Randomized Study [NCT05423392]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-02Completed
The Influence of Lidocaine Temperature on Pain During Subcutaneous Administration [NCT02107690]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
The Safety and Efficacy of Using HYADERMIS LA for Wrinkle Correction [NCT02128204]35 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Clinical Trial With Lozenges as Local Anesthetic Treatment for Head/Neck Cancer Patients With Oral Mucositis [NCT02252926]Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Efficacy of Lidocaine Versus Placebo in Palliative Care Patients With Opioid-refractory Cancer Pain With Neuropathic Component: a Multicenter, Prospective, Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Study. [NCT02137954]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-05-31Recruiting
Long Term Outcome After Serial Lidocaine Infusion in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain : A Pilot Study [NCT02217267]Phase 329 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-01Completed
Corticosteroid(CS) Injections for the Treatment of Common Upper Extremity Pathologies, With or Without Lidocaine [NCT03704584]Phase 462 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-14Terminated(stopped due to Enrollment and study activities were initially suspended due to COVID-19. The investigator has also left Emory and the study will not resume.)
Evaluation of Bioavailability of Lidocaine Dermal Products [NCT03145207]Early Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-14Completed
A Comparison of Pain Severity on Injection of MCT/LCT Propofol Between Lidocaine 20 mg, 40 mg, and Without Lidocaine. [NCT01345981]210 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Prospective Randomized Controlled Study for the Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on the Tolerability of Early Oral Feeding After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in Patients With Colorectal Cancer [NCT01346917]77 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
MULTICENTRE, RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL, TWO-ARM PARALLEL GROUPS, ACTIVE CONTROLLED STUDY DESIGN TO DEMONSTRATE EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF CLODRONATE 200 MG/4 ML SOLUTION FOR INTRAMUSCULAR USE WITH 1% LIDOCAINE EVERY OTHER WEEK VS CLODRONATE 100 MG/3,3ML SO [NCT01348243]Phase 3260 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
The Impact of Using Muscle Relaxants and Laryngeal Local Anesthetics for Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Insertion on Hemodynamics and Induction Anesthetics Dosage in Elderly [NCT05310110]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-12Recruiting
Successful Popliteal Block Using Lidocaine; What is the Minimum Effective Anesthesia Concentration (MEAC90) [NCT03613974]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-15Not yet recruiting
The Effects of Lidocaine and Esmolol on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Orotracheal Intubation: A Double-blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial [NCT03612492]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-01Recruiting
Transdermal Lidocaine as a Treatment for Tinnitus [NCT02088866]Early Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
The Influence of Lidocaine Volume on Discomfort During Administration of Local Anesthetic [NCT02086292]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
The Influence of Injection Speed on Pain During Administration of Local Anaesthetic. [NCT02107742]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
Ultrasound Guided Blocks of the Iliohypogastric and Ilioinguinal Nerves in Persistent Postherniorrhaphy Pain Patients [NCT01373593]Phase 412 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Terminated
Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion Improves Outcome After Laparoscopic Colectomy [NCT00330941]Phase 445 participants Interventional2003-01-31Completed
Sacrococcygeal Local Anesthesia With Different Doses of Clonidine for Pilonidal Sinus Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial [NCT02539693]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-31Recruiting
Topical Anesthesia Versus Placebo to Decrease Post Procedure Pain in Rubber Band Ligation for the Treatment of Grade I - III Symptomatic Internal Hemorrhoids. A Single Institution, Double Blinded, Placebo Controlled Trial. [NCT02130830]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Manipulation Versus Steroid Injection in the Treatment of Morton's Neuroma [NCT05707572]62 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Lignocaine Nebulization for Attenuation of Intubation Stress Response in Patients With Severe Pre-eclampsia: a Prospective Double-blinded Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT04441073]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-24Recruiting
Opioid Free vs Opioid Based Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Clinical, Randomised Study [NCT04260659]Phase 459 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-04Completed
A Pivotal USA Randomized, Evaluator-blinded, Active-controlled, Multi-center, Split-face Comparison Study of Emervel Classic Lidocaine Versus Juvederm® Ultra in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Facial Wrinkle Folds [NCT01205048]171 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Effect of Injectable Intracervical Anesthesia on the Pain Associated With the Insertion of the Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System in Women Without Previous Vaginal Delivery: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02155166]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Does Injection Site Matter? A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of Knee Intraarticular Injections on Improval of Patient Reported Outcomes. [NCT02176304]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Acmella Oleracea in the Analgesia of the Digital Rectal Examination [NCT05141864]Phase 1150 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-05Completed
A Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Endovenous Laser Ablation and Mechanochemical Ablation (ClariVein®) in the Management of Superficial Venous Insufficiency [NCT02627846]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-01Completed
Efficiency and Safety of Lidocaine Usage for Pupil Dilatation (Mydriasis) During Cataract Surgery [NCT01170130]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
The Effects Of Lidocaine Infusion On The Recovery Of Cognitive Function Following General Anesthesia In Elderly Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgeries Requiring A Minimum Two Day Hospitalization [NCT01179100]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Patient population require high amount of opioids.)
A Phase I Study of Stellate Ganglion Block and / or Reserpine in Group 2 Pulmonary Hypertension [NCT02684786]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to IRB did not approve)
Lidocaine-Ketamine Versus Ketamine for Induction of Anesthesia in Septic Shock Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03844984]Phase 343 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-20Completed
Comparison of Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine-dexamethasone Infiltration for Postoperative Analgesia in Skin Graft Donor Sites, a Randomized Trial [NCT03967392]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-10Completed
Study of Propofol Sedation During Upper Endoscopy With and Without Topical Pharyngeal Anesthesia [NCT01081002]Phase 4294 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Effect of Local Anesthetic Continuous Preperitoneal Wound Infiltration on Incisional Hyperalgesia Following Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery [NCT01077752]Phase 395 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
A Randomized Clinical Trial Estimating the Efficacy of Bolus Administration of Intravenous Lidocaine at the Time of Abdominal Hysterectomy to Decrease Postoperative Pain [NCT03748108]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-01Completed
Pertubation With Lignocaine in Endometriosis Associated Symptoms Effect Study [NCT01329796]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
The Utility of Long-acting Local Anesthetic Agents in Reducing Post-operative Opioid Requirements Following Rhinoplasty: A Multi-institutional, Randomized, Single Blinded Clinical Trial [NCT04377204]Early Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-01Completed
Ultrasound-guided Medial Lumbar Bundle Branch Block by Caudal-cranial Approach: Radiographic Comparison of a New Ultrasound-guided Method [NCT05930236]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-21Recruiting
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2 Study to Investigate the Efficacy of ORE-001 in Preventing Gastrointestinal Disturbance/ Intolerance in Patients After Longitudinal Laparotomy [NCT05923086]Phase 2126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-01Not yet recruiting
Neural Correlates of Lidocaine Analgesia [NCT05501600]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-22Recruiting
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of DKL Crosslinked Sodium Hyaluronate 26 Dermal Filler for Cheek Augmentation. [NCT05021926]48 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-30Completed
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of DKL Crosslinked Sodium Hyaluronate 23 Dermal Filler for Improvement of Nasolabial Fold Appearance [NCT05021913]48 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-20Completed
Ketamine, Lidocaine and Combination for Postoperative Analgesia in Open Liver Resection: A Prospective, Randomized, Four-arm, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT03391427]124 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-01Completed
Volatile Anaesthesia and Perioperative Outcomes Related to Cancer: The VAPOR-C Trial [NCT04316013]Phase 33,500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-31Recruiting
The Effect of Lidocaine on Perceived Comfort and Swallowing Pressures During High Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry [NCT03349112]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-22Completed
Comparison of Topical and Nebulized Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Esophago-Gastro-Duodenoscopy [NCT02317770]Phase 4110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-11-30Recruiting
Effect of Intravesical Lidocaine on Urodynamic and Symptomatic Parameters of Interstitial Cystitis [NCT00823030]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Withdrawn
Cefazolin-Lidocaine Solution for Reducing Pain Associated With Subconjunctival Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Vitreo-Retinal Surgery [NCT02324166]Phase 454 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-31Not yet recruiting
Safe Access: Randomized Trial to Compare Removal Techniques for the One-Rod Subdermal Contraceptive Implant: RemovAid Device Versus Standard Approach [NCT04120337]225 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-23Completed
Tumescent Antibiotic Delivery for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection: A Multicenter Open Label Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02503904]Phase 2/Phase 3400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-31Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Different Doses (Mass) of Local Anesthetic on Duration of Adductor Canal Block in Healthy Volunteers - Part 2 [NCT02172729]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
The Effect of the Popliteal Plexus Block on the Motor Function of the Leg - a Randomized, Controlled, Blinded Study in Volunteers [NCT05464862]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-30Not yet recruiting
Iontophoresis Effects on Senses [NCT02487914]Phase 2/Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
The Efficacy of Pulse Radiofrequency Treatment to Articular Branches of Femoral and Obturator Nerves in Patients With Coxarthrosis [NCT06034418]28 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-25Recruiting
Inter-semispinal Plane (ISP) Block for Postoperative Analgesia Following Cervical Spine Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT06003933]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-03-03Completed
A Double-blind, Multicentre, Multiple-dose, Enriched Enrolment, Randomized-withdrawal, Parallel-group Phase III Study With Lido-Patch and Corresponding Placebo Plaster in Patients Suffering From Postherpetic Neuralgia (PHN) [NCT03745404]Phase 3265 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-29Completed
Needle-free Dental Anesthesia: a Pilot Split-mouth Cross-over Randomized Clinical Trial. [NCT04493528]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-18Suspended(stopped due to COVID-19)
Effect of Peroperative Intravenous Infusion of Lignocaine on the Quality of Postoperative Sleep [NCT03317912]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-12-31Not yet recruiting
Postamputation Pain: Peripheral Mechanisms [NCT03317600]12 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-25Completed
Lidocaine Subcutaneous Infusion for Control of Treprostinil Related Site Pain [NCT01433328]Phase 44 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Safety considerations)
A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Trigger Point Injections With 1% Lidocaine Versus 5% Lidocaine Patch for Myofascial Pain in the Emergency Department [NCT05151510]Phase 4110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-01Recruiting
Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Blockade of Voltage Gated Sodium Channels During Surgery in Operable Breast Cancer [NCT01916317]Phase 31,600 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-12Active, not recruiting
Role of Chemokine and Chemokine Receptor in Psoriasis [NCT03302390]0 participants (Actual)Observational2017-04-17Withdrawn(stopped due to PI failed to submit study for continuing review by IRB)
A Pilot Clinical Trial to Reduce Side-effects of Autologous Skin Tissue Harvesting [NCT02234193]Early Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Completed
Health Related Quality of Life and Pain Managment Using Infiltration or Suprascapular Nerve Block Ultrasound Guided in Patients With Glenohumeral Arthirtis [NCT03794505]Phase 340 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-01Completed
An Open-label Pilot Study Evaluating Synera® in the Treatment of Patients With Patellar Tendinopathy [NCT01111773]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Lidocaine Infusion On Hysteroscopic Media Versus Oral Diclofinac For Pain Relief During Outpatient Hysteroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03298646]44 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-10-31Recruiting
A Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial of Targeted Injection Via a Transforaminal Approach With Dexamethasone Versus an Epidural Catheter Via an Interlaminar Approach With Particulate Steroid for the Treatment of Cervical Radicular Pain [NCT03382821]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-15Completed
Determine the Main Muscle Participant in the Deformation of the Elbow in Hemiplegic Patients [NCT02455232]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Low Dose Atracurium Added to Lidocaine, Bupivacaine and Hyaluronidase Mixture in Percaruncular Peribulbar Anesthesia for High Myopes Undergoing Phacoemulsification: A Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT03243500]Phase 491 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-01Completed
Opioid Free Anesthesia for Upper Limb Surgery in Obese Patients. [NCT05481970]76 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-30Not yet recruiting
The Effect of lidocaïne Infusion on ad Libitum Food Intake and Satiety in Healthy Volunteers [NCT03227900]Phase 426 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-19Completed
An Open-Label, Single and Multiple-Dose, Two-Period, Consecutive Study in Healthy Chinese Subjects to Assess the Pharmacokinetic Profiles, Safety and Tolerability of Lidocaine Patch 5%.LIG13-CN-101 Study [NCT02452112]Phase 2/Phase 3243 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-02Completed
Comparison of Zero- and Two-centimeter Distance From Sapheno-femoral Junction in Laser Ablation of Long Saphenous Vein Incompetence: Evaluating the Kissing Technique [NCT05707169]800 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-04Active, not recruiting
The Use of Propofol/Ketamine Anesthesia With Bispectral Monitoring (PKA-BIS) Versus Inhalational Anesthetics in Rhytidoplasty - A Prospective, Double-blinded, Randomized Comparison Study [NCT02410460]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Serum Opiorphin Level After Intraoperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion and Its Relation to Post-mastectomy Pain: a Prospective Double Blinded Study [NCT03502395]Phase 180 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-04Completed
Adjuncts to Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia, a Comparison Between Ketorolac and Paracetamol [NCT03485625]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-21Completed
Reliability Testing of a Non-invasive, Pain-free, Taste-based Assessment Approach to Lidocaine Effectiveness [NCT03680885]Early Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-01Completed
Ethyl Chloride-Endo Ice Versus 5% Lidocaine for Topical Anesthesia of Oral Mucosa - a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT05306470]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-01Completed
Efficacy of Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine in Sedation for Colonoscopy: a Randomised Placebo-controlled Study [NCT04439786]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Recruiting
Lidocaine Infusion for Pain After Herniotomy (LIPAH), A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial (LIPAH Trial) [NCT03673163]180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-06Recruiting
Intrauterine Lidocaine Infusion for Pain Management During Outpatient Essure Transcervical Tubal Sterilization Procedures [NCT00613834]Phase 458 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
LIdocaine Gel Versus Plain Lubricating Gel for Pain Reduction During Transrectal Sonography (LIPS) [NCT02567838]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
"Lidocaine 4% Cream (LMX4) vs Placebo for Pain Due to Lumbar Puncture in Infants 0-60 Days of Age." [NCT00533468]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Topical 5% Imiquimod Cream for Vulvar Paget's Disease: Clinical Efficacy, Safety and Immunological Response [NCT02385188]Phase 325 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Comparing Analgesic Efficacy of Systemic Lidocaine Against Placebo in General Anesthesia in Bariatric Surgery: Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo Controlled, Mono-Center Study [NCT03667001]Phase 3140 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-16Completed
Lidocaine Infusion for Postthoracotomy Pain Syndrome, A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial (LIPPS Trial) [NCT03666299]72 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-06Recruiting
Paravertebral Block Versus Simultaneous Ketamine and Lidocaine Infusions for Pain Management in Rib Fracture Patients [NCT04413799]Early Phase 1170 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Recruiting
A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of 7% Lidocaine / 7% Tetracaine Cream Versus 2,5% Lidocaine / 2,5% Prilocaine Cream for Local Anaesthesia During Laser Treatment of Acne Keloidalis Nuchae and Tattoo Removal [NCT02372786]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
BEAM: Prospective Open Label Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Juvéderm® VOLIFT®™ With Lidocaine for Treatment of Dynamic Radial Cheek Line Skin Depressions [NCT02980783]Phase 453 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-13Completed
Systemic Lidocaine Infusion or Quadratus Lumborum Block (in Addition to Intrathecal Morphine) Versus Intrathecal Morphine Alone as Part of a Gynecology-Oncology Surgery Early Recovery Protocol [NCT03658109]Early Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-24Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment challenges due to COVID-19)
The Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine With Continuous Infusion of Remifentanil for Attenuating Double Lumen Tube Induced Cough During Emergence [NCT04455711]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Not yet recruiting
Open-Label Study Assessing the Efficacy of Topical Lidocaine Patch in Treatment of Low Back Pain [NCT00904540]Phase 4131 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
Pain Prevention During Propofol Infusion in Pediatric: Hypnoanalgesia of the Hand Versus Lidocaine. [NCT03453723]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-18Completed
Clinical Significance of Parabens Flocculation on the Anti Inflrammmatory Effects of Corticosteroid Injection Osteoarthritic Knees [NCT03445611]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-15Withdrawn(stopped due to IRB process never completed.)
Onset and Duration of Forearm Nerve Blockade Performed With a Single Distal Injection Versus Sequential Injections at Distal and Proximal Locations Alongside the Nerves: A Blinded Randomized [NCT03649763]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-07Completed
Ketamine Versus Lidocaine Nebulization for Awake Nasal Fiberoptic Intubation: a Prospective, Randomized Double-blinded Study [NCT03414879]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-15Completed
The Effects of Lidocaine and Magnesium Sulphate on the Attenuation of the Hemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation: Single Center, Prospective, Double-Blind and Randomized Study [NCT02359370]Phase 449 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
An Exploratory Pilot Study in Healthy Volunteers to Assess the Parameters for the Design of Bioequivalence Studies on Moderately Lipophilic, Moderately to Highly Protein Bound Drugs Using Dermal Open Flow Microperfusion (dOFM) [NCT03613207]6 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-22Completed
A Prospective, Open Label, Multicenter, Post Market Study Evaluating Princess® FILLER Lidocaine for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds [NCT03611491]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-20Completed
Effect of Topical Lidocaine-prilocaine Cream Versus Rectal Meloxicam Suppository on Relief of Post-episiotomy Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03146000]Phase 3190 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-01Completed
Ultrasound-guided Sacroiliac Joint Radiofrequency Ablation: A Pilot Study [NCT02335190]31 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
A Prospective, Randomized Comparison Between Single and Double Injection Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block [NCT02334176]320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-31Not yet recruiting
Effect of Intraoperative IV Lidocaine Infusion on Intraoperative Isoflurane Requirements [NCT03386565]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-02Completed
Endocervical Lidocaine Spray for Pain Control During Office Hysteroscopy - a Randomized Control Trial. [NCT03382743]Phase 2/Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-12-20Recruiting
Pectoral Nerves Block to Relieve Post-sternotomy Pain After Cardiac Surgery [NCT04282239]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Did not have the staff to conduct the study)
Perioperative Pain Alleviation of Forearm Fractures Using a Combination of Hematoma Block and Intravenous Regional Anesthesia by Ketamine and Lidocaine [NCT03377907]66 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-01Completed
Pulpal Blood Flow With the Use of Intra-nasal Anesthetic: a Randomized Double-blind Crossover Study [NCT03368391]Phase 425 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-03Not yet recruiting
Effect of 2% Lignocaine Solution in Pain During Removal of Nasal Pack [NCT03602287]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-01Withdrawn(stopped due to the article is not a clinical trial but is a hospital based randomized comparative study. This was inadvertently uploaded.)
Lidocaine Versus Ketorolac for the Management of Renal Colic [NCT03137498]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-06Recruiting
Attenuation of the Hemodynamic Response to Double-lumen Endotracheal Intubation With Nebulized Lidocaine: a Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial [NCT05850702]Phase 492 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-15Not yet recruiting
Assistant Professor of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management [NCT05850468]140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-31Not yet recruiting
WALANT Versus Axillary Brachial Plexus Block in Carpal Tunnel Release: a Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT06040840]130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-01Not yet recruiting
Does Intravenous Lidocaine Reduce Propofol Consumption and the Side Effects of Sedation During Gastroscopy in ASA 1 and 2 Patients. [NCT05944887]46 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-07-21Completed
A Phase IV Single Blind Placebo-controlled Cross Over Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Greater Occipital Nerve Block With Local Anesthetic and Steroid in Patients With Chronic Migraine [NCT04017741]Phase 48 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-14Completed
Intravitreal Injection Anesthesia - Comparison of Different Topical Agents. [NCT01224847]92 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Effect of Systemic Lidocaine Infusion on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Trendelenburg Position [NCT05690087]66 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-01Recruiting
Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine in Attenuating Airway Reflexes During Recovery of Thyroidectomy Patients [NCT05657028]140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-01Recruiting
Effectiveness of Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for Post-Dural Puncture Headache; A Pilot Study [NCT03430531]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Study suspended and subsequently terminated due to Pandemic)
Phase II Study of Navigator vs Standard Needle Injection for Hip [NCT02066844]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
[NCT02591953]22 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Unable to meet enrollment and follow up criteria)
The Influence of Anesthesia on Postoperative Outcome and Complications in Colorectal Cancer Patients [NCT02786329]Early Phase 1450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-06-30Recruiting
A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded, Within-subject (Split-face), Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study to Compare the Level of Pain Using the Dermal Filler RHA® Redensity Formulated With Two Different Anesthetics in the Treatment of Perioral Rhyti [NCT04069585]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-30Completed
Use of Topical Lidocaine to Reduce Pain in Preterm Infants Receiving Nasal Contiuous Positive Airway Pressure [NCT02268968]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Modulating Surgery-Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in Elderly: Impact of Dexmedetomidine and Lidocaine, a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT06090955]108 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-31Not yet recruiting
Efficacy of Lidocaine Saline Irrigation in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroscopy: Randomized Controlled Study [NCT05624957]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-11-25Completed
A Randomized, Evaluator-blinded, Parallel Group, Comparator-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of GP0112 for Cheek Augmentation and Correction of Midface Contour Deficiencies [NCT05262777]210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-02Active, not recruiting
An fMRI Investigation of the Effects of IV Lidocaine on Tinnitus [NCT04192773]Early Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-28Recruiting
Transforaminal Epidural Injection in Acute Sciatica [NCT03924791]142 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-01Recruiting
Optimizing Patient Analgesic Experience During IVF [NCT01814657]308 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
The Effect of Opioid-Free Anesthesia in TMJ Surgery: A Prospective Study [NCT04724759]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-18Recruiting
Open-label, Randomized, Four-treatment, Four-sequence, Four-period, Crossover, Single-application Study Evaluating and Comparing Product Adhesion in Healthy Adult Subjects Using ZTlido 1.8% Versus Salonpas(Lidocaine Patch 4%), Aspercreme(Lidocaine Patch 4 [NCT05106400]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-07-01Completed
Comparison Between Ondansetron 8 mg and Lidocain 40 mg in Preventing Pain Due to Propofol Injection [NCT03134612]Phase 2104 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Thoracotomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT04221880]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-29Completed
[NCT02282774]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Will Adjusting the pH of Lidocaine Reduce the Pain During Injection of Local Anaesthetic? [NCT02107716]32 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
Comparative Study of Single Port Thoracoscopic Bullectomy Under Nonintubated Local and Sedation Anesthesia Versus Intubated General Anesthesia for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax. [NCT02109510]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Continuous Post-operative Lidocaine Infusion Following Major Reconstructive Spine Surgery in the Elderly to Minimize Delirium and Opiate Use: A Randomized Control Trial [NCT05010148]Phase 3278 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-17Recruiting
[NCT02253966]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
The Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Opioid Consumption After Lumbar Spine Surgery [NCT03624985]Phase 461 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-04Terminated(stopped due to Subjects had a high dropout rate. Of 61 consented, 24 did not participate. Reasons: Surgical cancellations; changing procedure type after consent; and staffing issues. The dropout rate of 39% was considered a barrier to publication.)
A Randomised, Multi-center, Subject and Evaluator-blinded Study Comparing Pain and Safety Profile Associated With Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds Using Restylane With and Without Addition of 0.3% Lidocaine Hydrochloride [NCT02918721]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-08Completed
Painless Sharp Wound Debridement With Lidocaine-23%-Tetra-caine-7% Gel Versus EMLA 5% Cream: a Single-blind, Crossover, Randomised, Controlled Trial [NCT05890703]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-01Recruiting
Patient-Applied Pretreatment Analgesia for Intrauterine Device Placement [NCT05890495]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-30Not yet recruiting
The Minimum Effective Concentration of Lidocaine for Ultrasound-guided Axillary Block for Arterio-venous Fistula Creation Surgery [NCT05063578]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-20Recruiting
A Novel, Repeatable, and Effective Local Anesthesia Method for Transperineal Prostate biopsy-a Single Center Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03500432]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-02Completed
The Effect of Subcutaneous and Intraperitoneal Instillation of Local Anesthetics on Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Varicocelectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05034406]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-01Completed
Optimum Dosage of Intravenous Lidocaine for Post-Operative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Bowel Surgery [NCT03095404]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to No funding available.)
Neuromodulation of Lidocaine Cream Effect on Chronic Pain Patients [NCT03046017]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-30Recruiting
Effects of Lidocaine Spray for Reducing Pain During Endometrial Aspiration Biopsy : a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03075358]Phase 3240 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-06Completed
Analgesic Effect of IntraPeritoneal LIGNOcaine in Gynaecological Open Surgery: A Double-blinded Randomised Placebo-controlled Trial (IP LIGNO Trial) [NCT05897385]112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-22Recruiting
Magnesium-sulfate as Adjuvant in Prehospital Femoral Nerve Block for Patient With Diaphysial Femoral Fracture: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03597945]48 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
Analgesic Efficacy of Adding SCB With Low Concentration Bupivacaine Combined With Dexamethasone to ACB and Periarticular Injection on Postoperative Pain After TKA: Randomized Controlled Study [NCT03486548]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-04-30Not yet recruiting
Intraurethral Lidocaine After Endourology Procedure to Improve Dysuria in Anesthetized Patients [NCT03537534]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-04-15Recruiting
Efficacy of Lidocaine Patch in Acute Musculoskeletal Pain in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study [NCT03571737]Phase 3180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-23Recruiting
Comparative Study Between Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation and Chemical Neurolysis of Thoracic Splanchnic Nerve Bilaterally for the Management of Abdominal Cancer Pain [NCT03063112]79 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-01Recruiting
Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study on the Effect of Multimodal Analgesia on Pain With Insertion of Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System [NCT02799641]61 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
[NCT02224170]8 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Due to difficulties in recruiting the subjects.)
Effect of Dexmedetomidine Infusion, Lidocaine Infusion, and Intrathecal Morphine Injection on Biomarker for Perioperative Stress and Immune Response, and Cancer Progression and Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer Surgery [NCT05742438]114 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-12Recruiting
Comparison of Lidocaine and Remifentanil for the Effect on Responses to the Endotracheal Tube During Emergence From General Anesthesia [NCT01082458]67 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Which Combination of Local Anesthesia is Superior for Postoperative Pain After Carpal Tunnel Surgery?: A Prospective Randomized Study. [NCT05697276]82 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-09-13Completed
Randomized Trial Evaluating Lidocaine Intravenous in the Emergency Department For Sickle Cell Crisis - RELIEF-SCC [NCT04614610]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
A Prospective, Open-label, Multicenter, Post-market Study Evaluating Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds [NCT03050710]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-27Completed
Comparison of the Efficacy of Corticosteroid and Local Anesthetic Injections Combined With Conventional Physiotherapy in Patients With Concomitant Pes Anserine Bursitis and Knee Osteoarthritis: [NCT04887844]102 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-01Completed
US Guided Interscalene Block Compared With Sedation for Shoulder Dislocation Reduction in the ER [NCT03041506]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-02-15Not yet recruiting
Reduction of Rocuronium-induced Injection Pain With Aspiration of Blood [NCT06150001]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
Does Intravenous Lidocaine Reduce ED 50 for Propofol Administered Using Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) During Gastroscopy in ASA 1 and 2 Patients. [NCT06143410]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-02-01Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Controlled Phase II Study of Repeat Dose ST-01 (Lidocaine Polymer Solution) vs Lidocaine for Spermatic Cord Block in Men With Chronic Scrotal Content Pain [NCT05707208]Phase 263 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-21Recruiting
Transdermal Microneedle Lignocaine Delivery Versus EMLA Patch for Topical Analgesia Before Venepuncture Procedure To Adults in Clinical Setting [NCT05694858]Phase 1/Phase 2154 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-02Recruiting
Evaluation of Self-Reported Pain in Children Submitted to Single Infiltration of Articaine During Primary Molar Extraction: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT05443009]Phase 496 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-30Recruiting
Diminishing Accelerated Long-term Forgetting in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Study Protocol for a Prospective, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05289804]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-01Recruiting
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Split-Face Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Revanesse Shape + With Lidocaine Versus Juvederm Voluma With Lidocaine for the Correction of Age-Related Midface Volume Deficit / Lipoatrophy at 6 and 12 Mont [NCT04927052]136 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-21Completed
Investigating the Minimum Number of Needling Required to Optimize Trigger Point Injections Outcome [NCT04732507]Phase 2300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-20Enrolling by invitation
Vestibulodynia: Understanding Pathophysiology and Determining Appropriate Treatments [NCT03844412]Phase 2400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-04Recruiting
Radiesse® Post Approval Safety Study - Radiological Evaluation of Implantation in the Hands [NCT02949921]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-01Completed
A Randomized, Double Blind Comparison of the Total Dose of 1.0% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine Versus 0.5% Lidocaine With 1:200,000 Epinephrine Needed to Achieve Effective Anesthesia During Mohs Micrographic Surgery [NCT00594542]149 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Evaluation of the Benefit Provided by the Addition of Acupunctural Analgesia With Electrostimulation to Conventional Local Anesthesia Compared to Conventional Local Anesthesia Alone in Surgery of Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders. [NCT02236260]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-03Completed
An Open-Label Pilot Study Evaluating Synera® in the Treatment of Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome [NCT00991068]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
The Effects of Optimizing Post-operative Pain Management With Multi Modal Analgesia on Immune Suppression and Oncologic Outcome in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery [NCT03462836]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to The results of the primary endpoints of this study are expected to be difficult to identify, thus canceling the study to readjust the study plan.)
Three-level Injection Paravertebral Block Using Paravertebral Catheter Compared to General Anesthesia in Mastectomy Surgery [NCT02065947]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
[NCT02076945]75 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
A Phase 1, Open Label, Randomized, Three-treatment, Three-sequence, Three-period, Crossover Adhesion Performance and Pharmacokinetic Study of Lidocaine Topical System 1.8% in Healthy, Adult Subjects Under Normal and Two Water Stress Conditions [NCT04784728]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-21Completed
Comparison of Different Volume of Steroid Hydrodilatation in Treating Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis [NCT05818111]86 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-31Recruiting
Bacteriostatic Normal Saline Versus Lidocaine for Intradermal Anesthesia During Lumbar Medial Branch Block [NCT04495868]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-08Completed
Effects of Hypertonic Dextrose Water Injection for Supraspinatus Tendinosis Patients: Analysis of Clinical and Sonographic Presentation [NCT03000205]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Completed
Topic Use of Lidocaine Gel Plus Paracervical Blockade vs. Paracervical Blockade Alone for Pain Control During Endouterine Manual Aspiration: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03397082]86 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-01Completed
Single-injection Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomized Sham-controlled Trial [NCT04337060]52 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-01Completed
Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Local Anesthetic Infiltration Combined With Monitored Anesthesia Care for Percutaneous Nephrostomy [NCT02121951]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Withdrawn
Effect of Intraoperative Lidocaine Infusion on Inducing Intestinal Motility and Surgery-induced Release of Pro-inflammatory Cytokines After Abdominal Surgery. A Prospective, Comparative, Randomized Double Blind Controlled Clinical Study [NCT05541640]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-01Recruiting
Effect of Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine and Remifentanil Perioperatively in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study [NCT02291094]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
Bacteraemia Secondary to Tooth Extraction: a Randomized Clinical Trial on Efficacy of Three Different Chlorhexidine Prophylaxis Protocols [NCT02150031]Phase 4208 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Lidocaine/Tetracaine Patch (Ralydan) vs Lidocaine/Prilocaine Cream (EMLA) for Needle Related Procedures in Children: a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02519660]Phase 3339 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
Ultrasound-guided Continuous Femoral Nerve Block: The Influence of Catheter Orifice Configuration (Six-hole Versus End-hole) on Post-operative Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Randomized Trial. [NCT03376178]72 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
"Study Protocol OFA: Opioid-Free Anesthesia." [NCT03124082]Phase 464 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-04Recruiting
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo- and Active-Comparator-Controlled, Single-Dose Study to Assess the Efficacy of KAI-1678 Administered by Subcutaneous Infusion in Subjects With Postherpetic Neuralgia [NCT01106716]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Comparison of Lidocaine/Tetracaine Patch (SyneraTM), 4% Liposomal Lidocaine Cream (LMX-4) and Placebo for Pain Reduction During Venipuncture in Children [NCT01115062]Phase 2150 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Topical Glyceryl Trinitrate Versus Lidocaine Cream as Analgesia for IUD Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02708251]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Completed
Functional Microarray Augmentation of Skin Treatment With Lidocaine (FAST Lidocaine) [NCT01145326]Phase 2/Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to The device is undergoing further study in China, per FDA requirements.)
A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Early Glenohumeral Cortisone Injection in Patients With Shoulder Stiffness Following Proximal Humerus Fractures [NCT04216017]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-01Completed
Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Versus Lidocaine in Treating Masticatory Myofascial Face Pain Using Ultrasound and EMG Guided Techniques [NCT00992108]Phase 417 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of eligible patients willing and able to participate)
Efficacy of Lidocaine as Local Anesthetics in Children Under Procedural Sedation and Analgesia Using Ketamine [NCT02205502]Phase 458 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-12-31Recruiting
Evaluation of Postoperative Experience of Two WALANT-type Modes of Anesthesia (Lidocaine Alone or Combined With Ropivacaine) Used in Ambulatory Surgery of the Upper Limb. A Single-center Prospective Randomized, Single-blind Study [NCT05343299]Phase 191 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-05-30Completed
Lidocaine-Prilocaine (EMLA) Cream as Analgesia in Hysteroscopy Practice: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT01094015]Phase 492 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
Comparison of Three Different Anesthetic Approaches for Intravitreal Injections: A Prospective Randomized Trial [NCT02263690]Phase 492 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
A Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Factorial, Comparator and Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of MRX-7EAT Etodolac-Lidocaine Topical Patch in the Treatment of Ankle Sprains [NCT01198834]Phase 3600 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Spinal Bupivacaine/Morphine in Laparoscopic Gastro-intestinal Surgery [NCT02284282]56 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Relieving Outpatient Hysteroscopy-associated Pain: What is the Most Effective Method? [NCT05801172]201 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-07-01Completed
A Single-blind Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of Lidocaine Patches for Opioid Reduction in Geriatric Rib Fracture Patients Admitted to the Hospital [NCT05714631]Phase 493 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-01Recruiting
A Pivotal USA Randomized, Evaluator-blinded, Active-controlled, Multi-center, Split-face Comparison Study of Emervel® Deep Lidocaine Versus Juvederm® Ultra Plus in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Facial Wrinkles and Folds [NCT01205061]162 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-27Completed
Hematoma Block vs. Bier Block: Which is More Effective for Closed Fracture Reduction? [NCT05086224]Early Phase 1500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-15Enrolling by invitation
Low Epidural Anesthesia With Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded Multi-centre Clinical Trial in China [NCT02287870]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
The Value of Endocervical and Endometrial Lidocaine Flushing Before Office Hystroscopy [NCT03530488]Phase 4250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-31Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lidocaine/Dexamethasone on the Success of IANB in Patients With Irreversible Pulpitis [NCT03531970]Phase 2/Phase 3100 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-01Completed
Comparison of Plasma Concentrations of Lidocaine and Bupivacaine After Ultrasound-guided Axillary Approach to Brachial Plexus Block Used With Different Dilute Mixture Solutions for Upper Limb Trauma Surgery [NCT03527836]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-17Enrolling by invitation
The Impact of Anesthesia on the Absorption of Glycine in Operative Hysteroscopy: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01124383]95 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
An Exploratory, Prospective, Randomized, Subject and Evaluator-blinded, Split-face, Single-centre Trial Investigating the Effectiveness and Safety of THIODERM STRONG Compared to Juvéderm® VOLUMA® Lidocaine for the Treatment of Midface Volume Deficit (TIMI [NCT06128109]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-01-24Active, not recruiting
Intravenous Lidocaine to Decrease Postoperative Pain in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Tonsillectomy: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT02595463]Phase 2/Phase 390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-11-30Recruiting
Efficacy of IV Lignocaine Versus IV Nalbuphine for Attenuation of Pressor Response Diring Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Patients Planned for Thyroid Surgery [NCT05298761]Early Phase 160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-30Not yet recruiting
Differential Analgesic Effects of Subanesthetic Concentrations of Lidocaine on Spontaneous and Evoked Pain in Human Painful Neuroma [NCT02300038]16 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Opioid Free Anesthesia in Bariatric Surgery: A Prospective, Double-blinded, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT03507634]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-11Completed
Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream in Conjunction With Lidocaine Paracervical Block for Pain With First-Trimester Abortion: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03508804]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of funding.)
Postoperative Pain Control With Systemic Lidocaine vs. Regional Anesthesia in Renal Transplant Patients [NCT05044429]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-16Recruiting
Intra-nasal Topical Local Anesthetic and Decongestant for Flexible Nasendoscopy in Children: a Randomised Double-blind Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT01351298]Phase 469 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Emla-Cream as Pain Relief During Pneumococcal Vaccination [NCT01802086]72 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Efficacy of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeries Under General Anesthesia [NCT03479320]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-28Completed
Effect of Lidocaine and Its Delivery in Patients With Chronic Cough [NCT01252225]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Comparing Bupivacaine, Lidocaine, and a Combination of Bupivacaine and Lidocaine for Labor Epidural Activation: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study [NCT03103100]Phase 375 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-08Completed
Neuromodulation of Placebo and Nocebo Effects [NCT03102710]103 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
"A Randomized, Multicenter, No-Treatment Control Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® With Lidocaine Injectable Gel for the Improvement of Volume and Aesthetic Appearance of the Nose in Chinese Adults" [NCT03430986]164 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-02Completed
Effects of Topical Lidocaine During Urodynamic Testing In Women [NCT03881293]110 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Pre-emptive Topical Lidocaine 5% Plaster for Prevention of Post-craniotomy Pain : a Protocol for a Randomized, Triple Blind, Placebo-controlled Trail [NCT04169854]Phase 3180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-15Recruiting
An Open, Randomised, Parallel Group Controlled, Single Centre Safety Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Tri-Solfen in Providing Anaesthesia Prior to Surgical Debridement of Leg Ulcers and Post-operative Pain Relief [NCT03865147]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-15Recruiting
Lidocaine Patch for Adjunct Analgesia for Postoperative Cesarean Birth Patients [NCT03500211]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-13Completed
Title: The Effect of Combined Ephedrine and Lidocaine Pretreatment on Pain Due to Propofol Injection in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery Under General Anaesthesia [NCT01186549]Phase 1/Phase 2165 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
A Comparative Study to Measure the Effect of Nebulized Dexmedetomidine - Lidocaine for Controlling Postoperative Pain After Tonsillectomy in Adults. [NCT05158348]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-05Recruiting
Does the Use of CBCT Pre-operative Measurements Improve the Success Rate of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block? - A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT05406895]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-25Recruiting
A Prospective, Open-label Study to Evaluate Sequential Treatment With BELKYRA® and Juvéderm® VOLUMA™ With Lidocaine for Overall Improvement in Jawline Contour [NCT03425253]Phase 458 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-02Completed
A Randomized, Comparison Study of L.M.X.4 Cream Versus J-Tip Needle-Free Injection System With Lidocaine in Children Undergoing In-Office Percutaneous Achilles Tenotomy for Clubfoot [NCT04766684]Phase 494 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-01Recruiting
Transdermal Lidocaine Patch for Post-Cesarean Pain Control for Women With Obesity: a Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03810235]Phase 466 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-15Completed
After Surgery Acute Renal Failure Incidence in Total Knee Arthroplasty With and Without Tourniquet [NCT03795805]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-15Completed
Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Greater Occipital Nerve Block in Patients of Chronic Migraine [NCT05679765]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-04-01Completed
Assessing the Efficacy of Virtual Reality Analgesia (VRA) in Adult Patients for Pain Control During Spinal Injections (SI) [NCT03787147]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Never started the study cause of the lack of funding)
Effects of Genicular Nerve Block for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis Who Have Neuropathic or Nociceptive Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03781843]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-03Active, not recruiting
Effect of Intravenous Lignocaine vs Placebo on Hemodynamic Response During Intubation [NCT03787069]Phase 3120 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-20Completed
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Lidocaine Patch for Relief of Pain During Epidural Needle Insertion in Laboring Patients [NCT01307839]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study was stopped due to non-availability of the lidocaine placebo patches.)
Evaluation of Pain With Belotero® Balance With Integral Lidocaine for Correction of the Nasolabial Folds [NCT03319719]52 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-18Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of a Bier's Block Compared to a Mini-bier's Block in Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery [NCT03761329]280 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-12Completed
An Open-label, Multicenter, Multiple-dose, Phase III Study With Lidocaine 5% Medicated Plaster in Patients Suffering From Postherpetic Neuralgia [NCT03765697]Phase 3259 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-16Completed
The Impact of Pre-procedure Periurethral Topical Lidocaine Application on Pain Scores After Complex Urodynamic Testing in Women [NCT03390790]Phase 4134 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-25Completed
Lidocaine Continuous Infusion for ERCP Procedures: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Controlled Trial [NCT05274984]Phase 1100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-03Recruiting
Impact of the Administration of Intravenous or Paravertebral Lidocaine in Continuous Perfusion During the Intraoperative Period of Lung Resection Surgery on the Appearance of Postoperative Complications [NCT03905837]Phase 4156 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-28Completed
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Blockade With Local Analgesic in Episodic Migraine [NCT05210192]Phase 350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-01Not yet recruiting
How Successful is Supplemental Intraseptal Anaesthesia in Patients With Mandibular Teeth Extraction or Irreversible Pulpitis [NCT03880409]Phase 1100 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-09Completed
Topical Jelly and Intracameral Anesthesia Versus Subtenon Anesthesia, in Cataract Surgery: Preference and Surgical Conditions [NCT01344252]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Withdrawn
Intravenous Lidocaine for Effective Pain Relief After Tonsillectomy: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study [NCT01291979]Phase 462 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-02-28Not yet recruiting
Comparing The Efficacy Of Preoperative Nebulized: Ketamine, Magnesium Sulfate, and Lidocaine In Attenuating Postoperative Sore Throat After Endotracheal Intubation [NCT03729973]Phase 3100 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-15Completed
Impact of Pyloric Injection With Magnesium Sulphate and Lidocaine Mixture on Early Postoperative Outcome After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy [NCT03729505]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-01Completed
Is Lidocaine Patch as Effective as Intravenous Lidocaine in Pain and Illus Reduction After Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery? A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04506034]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Not yet recruiting
Is Lidocaine Patch as Effective as Intravenous Lidocaine in Pain and Illus Reduction After Cesarean Section? A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04505644]180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Not yet recruiting
Effect of Buffered Lidocaine With Epinephrine in Local Anesthesia During Subcutaneous Implantable Venous Access Devices Insertion: Double Blind Randomized Study. [NCT03628430]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-01Completed
Impact of Topical Pharyngeal Anesthetics on Discharge of the Patients When Used in Conjunction With Propofol Sedation in Routine EGD's [NCT02507440]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Evaluation of Collagen Dermal Filler With Lidocaine for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds: a Prospective, Randomized, Active-controlled, Double Blinded, Multicenter Clinical Trial [NCT03844529]240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-01Active, not recruiting
Effect of Knee Pain on Walking Biomechanics [NCT05670236]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-25Recruiting
Suprascapular Nerve Block Guided by Ultrasound in the Rehabilitation of the Supraspinatus Tendonitis - A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial [NCT02495818]Phase 287 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Impacts of Intermittent Fasting in Adults on Energy Balance, Body Composition, Postprandial Hormone Profiles and Gene Expression in Adipose Tissue [NCT02498002]54 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
WALANT Technique (Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet) in Association With Analgesic Troncular Blocks at the Wirst for Carpal Tunnel Release. [NCT04494100]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-11Completed
An International, Multicenter, Evaluator-blinded, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Controlled Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of HArmonyCa Lidocaine Injectable Gel for Mid Face Soft Tissue Augmentation [NCT05452070]Phase 3171 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-09-02Active, not recruiting
Preemptive Local Anesthetic Infiltration Reduces Opioid Requirements Without Attenuation of the Intraoperative Evoked Stapedial Reflex Thresholds in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Surgery [NCT03721081]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-01Completed
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Prospective Study of Cannula Injection of Restylane Lyft With Lidocaine for Cheek Augmentation and the Correction of Age Related Midface Contour Deficiencies [NCT03160716]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-16Completed
Monitored Anesthesia Care Using Remifentanil and Ketofol Results in a Superior Quality of Recovery Compared With Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Ambulatory Breast Augmentation [NCT03764267]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-01Completed
the Effect of Opioid-free General Anesthesia on the Recovery Quality After Gynecological Laparoscopy [NCT04409964]78 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-01Completed
Effect of Intravenous Lignocaine Infusion on Intraoperative End Tidal Desflurane Concentration Requirements: A Randomised Double-Blinded Controlled Study [NCT06064331]48 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-21Completed
Comparison of Postoperative Pain With Two Different Types of Local Anesthesia in Surgery for a Drooping Eyelid [NCT01350024]34 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-01Completed
Lidocaine Lubricant Use as an Anesthetic Agent in Emergency Room Urethral Catheterization [NCT00596375]47 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Liposomal Bupivacaine vs. Bupivacaine Hydrochloride and Lidocaine During Suburethral Sling Placement: a Randomized Control Trial [NCT02875015]57 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
Addition of Buprenorphine to Paracervical Block Prior to Osmotic Dilator Insertion for Dilation and Evacuation: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04254081]Phase 457 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-28Completed
Comparison of Trigger Point Injections Versus Traditional Therapies in the Management of Postsurgical Pain in Patients Who Had Anterior Cervical Surgery [NCT04640896]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-05Recruiting
A Randomized Blinded Controlled Trial of EXPAREL vs 1% Lidocane as Local Anesthetic in Patients Undergoing Pleuroscopy With Pleural Biopsy and Indwelling Pleural Catheter Placement [NCT05044468]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-23Recruiting
Effect of Lidocaine 5% Patch Supplementation to Intra-articular Bupivacaine Dexmedetomidine After Arthroscopic Knee Surgery Under General Anesthesia [NCT04322760]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-01Completed
A Comparison of Scar Infiltration, Scar Deactivation, and Standard of Care for the Treatment of Chronic, Post-Surgical Pain After Cesarean Section in the Primary Care Setting: A Comparative Effectiveness Trial. [NCT03936309]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-01Recruiting
Subacromial Ultrasound-guided or Systemic Steroid Injection for Rotator Cuff Disease, a Randomized Double Blinded Study [NCT00640575]106 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Phase Ib Pilot Multiple Dose, Randomized-Withdrawal, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Topically Applied 40% Lidocaine Gel Compared With Placebo in Subjects With Acute Herpes Zoster Pain [NCT02679339]Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Limited patient enrollment)
Suprascapular Nerve Block in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain. [NCT00732589]Phase 20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Prospective, Split-face, Randomized, Comparative Trial on the Efficacy of Two Hyaluronic Acid Products (Restylane + Lidocaine and Restylane Lyft) for the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds [NCT04174131]Phase 310 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-13Completed
An Open-Label Study Of The Use Of Topical Lidocaine (2.5%)/Prilocaine (2.5%) Cream As Pre-Treatment For NGX-4010 In Subjects With Postherpetic Neuralgia (PHN) [NCT00916942]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Pilot Study of Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Propofol Requirement During Monitored Anesthesia Care in Facial Plastic Surgery [NCT02597140]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
Cutaneous Administration of Local Anesthetic for Spine Injection Procedures: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient Preferred Method [NCT00756301]55 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Comparison of Bolus Intravenous Lidocaine Administration With Continuous Intravenous Lidocaine Against Post-Extubation Cough Incidence in Post-Thyroidectomy Patients [NCT06040034]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-02-02Completed
Pediatric Tonsillectomy Pain Reduction Study, a Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial Using Clonidine and Local Anesthetics [NCT00678379]Phase 3120 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Source of Neurally-Mediated Hand Weakness After Stroke [NCT00907829]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to Methods unexpectedly required additional refinement that precluded subject enrollment.)
The Effect of Dexmedetomidine Subsidiary Analgesia and Sedation in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Under Local Anesthesia:A Randomized, Double Blind Controlled Trial [NCT02535273]Phase 4212 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Not yet recruiting
Randomized Study Comparing Local/ MAC Anesthesia to General for 1-3 Level Lumbar Decompressions [NCT04992572]Early Phase 1100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-01Recruiting
An Objective Assessment of Dental Fear, and the Influence of the Parental Presence on the Behavior of Anxious Children on Their First Restorative Dental Visit [NCT02619981]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Bladder Irrigation With 0.05% Lidocaine Normal Saline Solution for Prevent Postoperative Catheter Related Bladder Discomfort (CRBD) Under ANI Monition After Transurethal Surgery [NCT04133571]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-17Recruiting
A Phase II, Double-Blind, Crossover Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 10% (150mg) Lidocaine Vaginal Gel Administered to Women With Recurrent Dysmenorrhea [NCT00651313]Phase 281 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Evaluation of the Analgesy Using a Local Anesthetic (Lidocaine and Prolocaine) Eutectic Mixture and/or Nitric Oxide at 50% in Oxygen (Livopan®) in Pediatric Patients That During Lumbar Puncture [NCT00808171]Phase 452 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Spasmodic Dysphonia Pain Study [NCT04648891]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-01Recruiting
A Prospective, Multicentre, Double-Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Topical Metronidazole, Diltiazem and Lidocaine on Post-Operative Pain Following Excisional Haemorrhoidectomy [NCT04276298]Phase 2/Phase 3192 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-01Completed
[NCT00822133]Phase 475 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-02-28Not yet recruiting
Intravenous Lidocaine in Total Knee Replacement [NCT03597776]Phase 490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-03Recruiting
The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on the Time Course of Rocuronium Induced Neuromuscular Block. A Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Electrophysiological Study [NCT00828373]Phase 452 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
The Impact of Intravenous Anaesthesia on Angiogenesis in Patients With Breast Cancer [NCT02839668]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multi-Center Single Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of VNX001 Compared to Placebo, the Individual Components of Lidocaine, and Heparin in Subjects With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladd [NCT05737121]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-22Recruiting
Effectiveness of Serratus Anterior Muscle Plane Block With Thoracic Paravertebral Block For Unilateral Mastectomies [NCT02822196]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Critical study personnel left the institution)
A Comparative Randomized Study Between Dexmedetomidine, Magnesium Sulphate and Lidocaine on the Pressor Response to Laryngoscopic Intubation for Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery [NCT05659212]102 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-03Not yet recruiting
Treatment for Achilles Tendinopathy [NCT00835939]Phase 2/Phase 317 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Active, not recruiting
The Effect of Intravenous Infusions of Lidocaine and Magnesium Versus Lidocaine and Ketamine Versus Lidocaine Alone on Recovery Profile and Postoperative Pain After Elective Gynecological Surgery [NCT04622904]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-14Recruiting
The Efficacy and Safety Profile of Capsaicin 8% Patch Versus 5% Lidocaine Patch in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: a Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study of South Asian Male Patients [NCT04238208]Phase 4290 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-10Completed
Topical Anesthesia With Lidocaine Patch for Removal of Metal Staples After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial [NCT02812602]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-04-30Recruiting
MEOPA Breathing Analgesia vs Local Anesthesia for Oocyte Retrieval in ART: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study [NCT00853177]Phase 477 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
[NCT02807298]Phase 325 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Recalcitrant Pruritus in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma [NCT00863395]Phase 1/Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Terminated
Combined Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine and Dexamethasone on Postoperative Sore Throat, Cough and Hoarseness. A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01990781]Phase 4180 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Single-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating Postoperative Non-Opioid Pain Management Utilizing Local Anesthetics Coupled With Modulated Coagulation [NCT04814433]Phase 45 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-24Terminated(stopped due to Both lack of enrollment as well as study staff turnover)
Effect of Sodium Bicarbonate Buffered Lidocaine on the Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Teeth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized Double-blind Study [NCT02226913]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Intravenous Lidocaine Reduces Pain Scores and Opioid Consumption in Open Lung Resection Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial [NCT04480281]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-10Completed
Occurrence of Heart Arrhythmia During Restorative Dental Procedure Under Local Anesthesia , in Heart Failure Pacients. A Double-blind Study [NCT02228083]70 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-09-30Recruiting
Open Label Extension Study for 43USSA1705 (A Randomized, Evaluator-blinded, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Sculptra Aesthetic for Correction of Nasolabial Folds) [NCT04225273]38 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-03Completed
A 3-arm Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasound-guided Cryoablation, Ultrasound-guided Perineural Lidocaine and Ultrasound-guided Perineural Saline to Treat Intermetatarsal Neuroma [NCT02838758]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
An Open-label Pilot Study Evaluating Synera® in the Treatment of Patients With Pain Associated With Myofascial Trigger Points [NCT01106989]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Shamrock Versus Lumbar Ultrasound Trident - Ultrasound Guided Block of the Lumbar Plexus: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02255591]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Completed
Effects of Lidocaine Infusion on Quality of Recovery and Agitation After Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Randomized Controlled Study [NCT04472689]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Recruiting
Analgesic Benefit of PECS Blocks for Biceps Tenodesis Shoulder Surgery [NCT02741713]Phase 340 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
Prospective Analgesic Compound Efficacy (PACE) Study [NCT02403687]300 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2015-06-30Completed
[NCT02185859]126 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Determination of the Effective Volume of the 0.125% Bupivacaine-fentanyl 5mcg/mL Mixture Used for Epidural Analgesia in Labor [NCT01972269]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Efficacy of Variable Lidocaine Concentrations in Tumescent Anesthesia for Pain Control During and After Endovenous Laser Procedure; a Double Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Non-inferiority Trial [NCT02192411]70 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-07-31Not yet recruiting
Comparison Between Dexmedetomidine and Lidocaine as an Adjuvant to General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgeries [NCT03600493]Phase 464 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-08-31Not yet recruiting
Safety, Efficacy and Patient Acceptability of Topical Treatment Versus Systemic Treatment: a Randomized, Multicentre, Comparative Pragmatic Trial in Adult Patients Suffering From Diverse Localized Neuropathic Pain (LNP) Syndromes [NCT03348735]Phase 433 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-03Terminated(stopped due to Low inclusion rate)
Does Lidocaine Gel Decrease Pain Perception in Women Undergoing Diagnostic Flexible Cystoscopy? [NCT03347721]Phase 4129 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-01Active, not recruiting
Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser Assisted Delivery of Topical Anesthetics: a Randomized Controlled Pilot Study [NCT02246179]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
A Randomized Comparison Between 1 Plane - 1 Injection (Cluster Approach) and 2 Plane - 2 Injection Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block (US-SCBPB) in Upper Extremity Surgery [NCT02505633]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
The Use of MicronJet600 Microneedle for Intradermal Lidocaine Injection to Ensure Local Anaesthesia During Insertion of Peripheral Venous Catheters [NCT05108714]102 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-29Completed
Control of Emergence Hypertension After Craniotomy: Comparison Between the Efficacy of Magnesium Sulphate and Lidocaine Infusion (Randomized Controlled Study) [NCT03566329]Phase 190 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-10Recruiting
A Prospective, Triple Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of STYLAGE® M LIDOCAINE Versus STYLAGE® M in Filling Nasolabial Folds [NCT05087732]64 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-19Completed
Efficacy in Ablative Fractional Laser Assisted Photodynamic Therapy According to Ablative Depth for Actinic Keratosis [NCT03325803]Phase 145 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-01Completed
Evaluation of the Merz Cheek Fullness Assessment Scale in the Treatment of Midface Volume Deficit [NCT03321825]66 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-29Completed
[NCT02006966]168 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
[NCT02007330]66 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
Investigating Systemic Effects of Lidocaine Infusion for Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Catheter [NCT03971708]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
Effect of Lidocaine Transdermal Patch as Add-On Therapy in Treatment of Oxaliplatin Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Colorectal Cancer Patients [NCT05866653]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-25Recruiting
General Anesthesia Versus Sedation During Intra-arterial Treatment for Stroke [NCT02822144]Phase 3351 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-29Completed
[NCT02018276]135 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Intra-individual Reproducibility in Nerve Block Duration [NCT03310047]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-30Completed
Randomised Trial of Intra-articular Injection of Lidocaine Versus Placebo in Inflammatory Arthritis [NCT05302232]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-18Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Effect of 10% Lidocaine Spray on Hemodynamic Response and EKG Parameter Performed Before Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Operation [NCT03304431]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-26Completed
Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression and Catabolism Syndrome (PICS): A New Horizon for Surgical Critical Care: Project 4B: Lower Extremity Strength Training in ICU Patients [NCT02467023]5 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine Patches for Attenuating the Pain of Venipuncture Intravenous Cannulation Before Surgery: a Multicenter, Randomized, Double -Blind, Placebo-controled and Parallel-group Designed Clinical Trail [NCT02061475]Phase 2/Phase 3240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-04-30Recruiting
PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN AMIODARONE Versus LIDOCAINE IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM [NCT03299517]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-02Recruiting
The Effects of Ultrasound Guided Ozone and Lidocaine Injections on Pain, Functional Level and Posture in Piriformis Syndrome [NCT06130618]28 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-01Recruiting
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Radiesse (+) to Improve the Contour of Jawline by Adding Volume to the Jawline [NCT03583359]180 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-06Completed
Postoperative Pain Management With Topical Lidocaine After Arthroscopy on Knee. A Randomized Double-blind Study [NCT02460627]Phase 1180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-05-31Not yet recruiting
The Importance of Needle Gauge for Pain During Injection of Local Anaesthetic [NCT02107729]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
Evaluation of Adding Lidocaine to Dexamethasone in Intra-tympanic Injection for Management of Tinnitus [NCT03265197]Phase 144 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
Comparison of the Success Rate of Anesthesia Between Lidocaine 2% and Lidocaine 2% Mixed With 10% Magnesium Sulfate in the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Posterior Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis [NCT03262857]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-21Completed
Comparison of Different Dose of Steroid Injection in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome [NCT03072290]56 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-18Completed
Epidural Versus General Anesthesia for Laparoendoscopic Single Site Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Comparative, Controlled, Blinded Study [NCT03247257]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Enrolling by invitation
En Mekanistisk undersøgelse af Interaktioner Imellem Det Thermoceptive og Det Pruriceptive Sensoriske System [NCT03576053]59 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-01Completed
Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion for Traumatic Rib Fracture Pain Control [NCT03571919]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-15Withdrawn(stopped due to Inability to recruit during the Covid pandemic)
Comparison of the Effect of Lidocaine Infusion Applied at Different Doses During Lumbar Spinal Surgery on Hemodynamics and Postoperative Pain [NCT05936190]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-10Recruiting
The Clinical Trial of Difference Between Formaderm Lidocaine and Formaderm Dermal Filler Injection [NCT05935449]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-04Completed
Human Cold Pain - a Single-group, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Adaptive, Factorial Crossover Trial [NCT05935280]Early Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-31Not yet recruiting
Rectal Indomethacin Versus Intraperitoneal Lidocaine for Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [NCT04964180]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-01Completed
Feasibility, Perceived Utility and Sustainability of Using Ultrasound-guided Regional Anesthesia by Local Providers in a Limited Resource Conflict Setting [NCT02084225]60 participants (Anticipated)Observational2012-01-31Active, not recruiting
Early Versus Late Deflation of Distal Tourniquet in Intravenous Regional Anesthesia With and Without Ketorolac in Hand & Forearm Surgery [NCT05234619]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-01Active, not recruiting
Effect of Pretreatment of Lignocaine Versus Midazolam in the Prevention of Etomidate Induced Myoclonus [NCT04921046]Phase 4224 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-01Completed
Comparison of Long Acting vs. Short Acting Anesthetic Agents as a Tool for Improving Pain Management Post Ultrasound Guided Breast Biopsy [NCT02085239]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study never got started; can't delete results)
Oral Phenazopyridine Versus Intravesical Lidocaine for Office OnabotulinumtoxinA Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03755089]Phase 4110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-01Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of De-Novo Algorithm and Formula in the Treatment of Patients With Intractable Chronic Craniofacial Neuralgia, or Chronic Migraine Headaches. [NCT03220113]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-07-01Recruiting
Effect of Pre-injection of Lidocaine on Myoclonus Induced by Induction With Etomidate in Elderly Patients During General Anesthesia [NCT02141737]Phase 4272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-05-31Recruiting
Fentanyl vs. Lidocaine/Ketamine Infusion for Hip Arthroscopy [NCT02150161]Phase 353 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Terminated(stopped due to DSMB estimated futility of the trial and safety risk)
Assessment of Efficacy and Side Effects of Dlitiazem Ointment With Lidocaine vs. Diltiazem Ointment With Lidocaine for Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04887818]Phase 2/Phase 3430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-30Not yet recruiting
Efficacy of Intrauterine Lidocaine and Naproxen for Pain Control With Intrauterine Device Insertion [NCT02769247]160 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Prophylactic Lidocaine Spray for Pain Alleviation in Women Undergoing Osmotic Dilator Insertion for Second Trimester Dilatation and Evacuation [NCT02097017]Phase 4134 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-01Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion to Decrease Pain Scores and Opioid Consumption After Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy and Robotic-Assisted Partia [NCT03824808]Phase 421 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-26Terminated(stopped due to Challenges with recruitment of surgical research subjects in the target population.)
The Effect of Topical Lidocaine and Benzocaine on Pain and Injection Satisfaction in Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Applications [NCT04859738]Phase 3120 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-03-04Completed
Effect of Betamethasone Gel and Lidocaine Jelly Applied Over Tracheal Tube Cuff on Post Operative Sore Throat, Cough and Hoarseness of Voice on the Patients [NCT02114021]Phase 399 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Sciatic Popliteal Nerve Block in Foot Surgery: Lidocaine Versus Bupivacaine in Ambulatory Continuous Block With Elastomeric Pump [NCT02121119]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Radial Artery Blood Gas Sampling: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Lidocaine Local Anaesthesia [NCT02125565]43 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
Topic Cervical Anesthesia Plus Paracervical Blockade vs. Topical Cervical Anesthesia Alone for Pain Control During Endouterine Manual Aspiration [NCT04791020]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-08Completed
The Safety and Efficacy of 5% Lidocaine Patch and Flurbiprofen Patch for Relieving Acute Low Back Pain [NCT03171987]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-06-14Recruiting
The Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in Chronic Unilateral Migraine Headache Clinical and Laboratory Assessment .Aprospective Randomized Double Blind Controlled Study [NCT06109389]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-10-01Active, not recruiting
The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Hemodynamic Reaction to Tracheal Intubation, as Well as Metabolic and Hormonal Response to Laparoscopic Procedure in Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05238506]Phase 4132 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-12Completed
The Use of Intralipid® 20% Solution to Reverse the Anesthetic Effect of Local Anesthetics: a Proof of Concept Study in Volunteers [NCT03968822]Phase 418 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-26Recruiting
Occipital Nerve Blocks for Acute Treatment of Pediatric Migraine [NCT03526874]Phase 3116 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-03Completed
Treatment of Calcific Tendinitis of the Rotator Cuff - a Multi-centre, Randomized and Sham Controlled Trial (KALK Study) [NCT02419040]220 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
A Study Attempting to Improve the Comfort During Screening Mammography [NCT02924441]251 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-01Completed
Efficacy of Prolonging Intravenous Lidocaine by 72 Hours on Postoperative Pain and Recovery in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study [NCT04295330]260 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-27Completed
PROUD Study - Preventing Opioid Use Disorders [NCT04766996]Phase 457 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-17Terminated(stopped due to Loss of surgery team member deemed the study procedures impossible to achieve, and no replacement could be found in a timely manner to complete trial as initially planned.)
Opioid Sparing Analgesia: Intraoperative Infusion Dexmedetomidine Versus Lidocaine for Intracranial Surgeries in Children [NCT04535089]Phase 1/Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-01Completed
Impact of Intraoperative Intravenous Lidocaine Administered During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery on Remifentanil Consumption, Postoperative Pain and Immune Cell Activity: A Pilot Study [NCT03410836]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-29Recruiting
A 4-arm, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo- and Active-controlled, Single Dose, Parallel Group Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed Combination of 500 mg Acetylsalicylic Acid + 4 mg Lidocaine With 500 mg Acetylsalicylic Acid and 4 m [NCT01361399]Phase 31,088 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
"Clinical Study on Pain Control of Cervical Dilation by Lidocaine Solution Injected Into a Single-use Micro-non-invasive Injection Cervical Dilator" [NCT05955768]74 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-21Enrolling by invitation
Interaction Between Epidural 2-chloroprocaine and Epidural Morphine: Effect of Timing on Efficacy of Morphine Analgesia After 2-chloroprocaine Anesthesia [NCT00487084]136 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
The Effect of Perioperative Lidocaine Infusion on Neutrophil Extracellular Trapping in the Patients Undergoing the Robot-assisted Prostatectomy [NCT04840511]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-27Active, not recruiting
MEOPA (Equimolar Mix of Oxygen and Nitrogen Monoxide) Versus Local Anesthesia for Analgesia During Chorionic Villus Sampling. [NCT02573987]Phase 4192 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-13Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Of Lidocaine Patch 5% Alone, Gabapentin Alone, And Lidocaine Patch 5% And Gabapentin In Combination For The Relief Of Pain In Patients With Diverse Peripheral Neuropathic Pa [NCT00904202]Phase 462 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
[NCT00975910]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Effectiveness and Safety of Lidocaine for Scleroderma. Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial [NCT00740285]Phase 2/Phase 326 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: a Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT06138041]770 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-04-01Not yet recruiting
Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion Versus Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy [NCT06078241]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-01Recruiting
Rapid Local Anesthesia by Lidocaine Administered Using STAR Particles [NCT06034340]22 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-03-19Completed
Combined Intracameral Lidocaine for Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery Under Topical Anesthesia [NCT01023334]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Under General Anesthesia [NCT04061057]98 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-19Completed
Intravesical Alkalized Lidocaine for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder (OAB), a Randomized, Double-blinded Controlled Trial [NCT00427648]Phase 322 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Terminated(stopped due to funding ran out, poor accrual.)
Lidocaine Infusion in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery [NCT03047070]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-09Completed
Effect of Intraoperative Intravenous Lidocaine on Pain After Hysterectomy [NCT00965796]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Tumescent Lidocaine Bioavailability and Absorption Kinetics:Maximum Safe mg/kg Lidocaine Dosage [NCT00977028]Phase 1/Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Enrolling by invitation
Intravenous Lignocaine Infusion as a Multimodal Analgesic Approach in Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy [NCT04052867]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-17Recruiting
Comparison of Two Analgesic Pretreatment Techniques (2% Lidocaine Infiltration vs. EMLA Cream Application) Before Spinal Needle Insertion for Pain Reduction and Maternal Satisfaction Level Assessment in Women Undergoing LSCS. A Prospective Randomized Cont [NCT04050059]62 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-13Completed
The Importance of Gluteus Maximus Muscle in Patients With Preliminary Diagnosis of Piriformis Syndrome: Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind, Crossover Study [NCT05271071]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-14Completed
Temporary Inactivation of Strong Muscle Sensation to Improve Rehabilitation Interventions in SCI [NCT05589402]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-04Recruiting
An Evaluation of Parent and Nurse Satisfaction Associated With Pediatric Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement Using Standard of Care vs. ZingoTM in the Emergency Department [NCT00766181]200 participants (Anticipated)Observational2008-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Product withdrawn from distribution)
Comparison of Onset of Action Between 2% Lidocaine Plus 0.5% Bupivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine in Brachial Plexus Anesthesia for Creation of Arteriovenous Fistula in ESRD Patient [NCT00993746]Phase 490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-10-31Recruiting
Topical Amitriptyline, Ketamine and Lidocaine in Neuropathic Pain Caused by Radiation Skin Reaction: a Pilot Study [NCT00798083]Phase 322 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Clinical Comparison of Two Anesthetic Preparations for Intravitreal Injection [NCT01087489]53 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Efficacy of a Bolus Dose of Remifentanil Compared to a Bolus Dose of Intravenous lidocaïne on the Incidence of Coughing During Emergence of Anesthesia. [NCT01026129]93 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Local Injection of Lidocaine Versus Ischemic Compression in Treatment of Woman With Chronic Pelvic Pain Caused by Abdominal Myofascial Pain Syndrome: Randomized Clinical Trial. [NCT00628355]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Terminated(stopped due to Lidocaine injection group showed significant improvement in pain)
Patient Assessment of Topical Anesthetic Effectiveness for Intravitreal Injections [NCT01027611]Phase 3120 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Manifestations of Fibromyalgia [NCT00991848]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
[NCT00822419]Phase 475 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-02-28Not yet recruiting
Comparison Of Greater Occipital Nerve Block With Lidocaine And Bupivicaine Alone Or With Steroids In a Chronic Headache Population [NCT00203294]45 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
The Impact of Anesthetic Injection Rate, Temperature and Buffering on Pain Perception During Dermatologic Procedures: a Multicenter, Single-blinded Randomized Control Trial [NCT02823002]26 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Two-Period, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Depth and Duration of Anesthesia of Synera™ Patches Compared to Placebo Patches Applied to Healthy Adult Volunteers [NCT00891163]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Efficacy of Inhaled 50% Equimolar Nitrous Oxide/Oxygen Gas Premix (Kalinox®) as Compared to Topically Administered 5% Eutectic Mixture of Lidocaine/Prilocaine (EMLA®) in Chronic Leg Ulcer Debridement [NCT02696460]21 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
A Randomized Controlled Study of Compound Lidocaine Cream to Prevent Postoperative Agitation in Patients With Endotracheal Intubation for General Anesthesia [NCT02017392]Phase 42,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-12-31Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind Study Comparing The Efficacy And Safety Of Lidocaine 5% Patch With Placebo In Patients With Chronic Axial Low Back Pain [NCT00904111]Phase 2215 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
Ajou University School of Medicine [NCT02827136]63 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-08Completed
Ketamine vs Propofol for Sedation During Pediatric Bronchoscopy [NCT02743104]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-31Suspended(stopped due to Protocol being reconsidered)
Comparison of Perioperative Opioid Consumption Following Pectoral Nerve Block Under General Anesthesia for Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02741232]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Minimally Invasive Knee Osteoarthritis Pain Control Via Adductor Canal Block Versus Intra-articular Steroid and Lignocaine Injection : a Single-blinded Controlled Trial [NCT04264481]64 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-12Completed
Opioid Sparing Analgesia Continuous Intraoperative Infusion of Dexmedetomidine Versus Lidocaine for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy a Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial [NCT05788393]Phase 464 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Analgesic Ear Drops as add-on Treatment to Oral Analgesics in Children With Acute Otitis Media: a Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT05651633]Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-06Recruiting
Randomized Study of the Use of Tamoxifen Versus Ointment Lidocaine for Reducing the Pain and Discomfort in Mammography [NCT02801786]Phase 2/Phase 3450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-30Not yet recruiting
Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine on Opioid Consumption and Pain After Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernioplasty [NCT02601651]Phase 464 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Standard TDS Irritation Study: Trained Skin Grader vs. Digital Imaging [NCT02787356]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Project was not funded by FDA)
Investigation of the Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion During Sedation for Colonoscopy [NCT02784860]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Dose-Ranging, Double Blind Study of Lidocaine Hydrochloride and/or Hydrocortisone Acetate (Alone or in Combination) in the 14-Day Twice-Daily Treatment of Grade I or II Hemorrhoids [NCT02689856]Phase 2211 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Interest of the Alkalinization of the Adrenaline Lidocaine Solution for Conversion of Epidural Analgesia Into Epidural Anesthesia During an Emergency Caesarean [NCT04255121]Phase 3400 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-22Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Lidocaine Patch for Lower Limb Amputation Pain [NCT02696720]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-13Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of recruitment)
Greater Occipital Nerve Block for Migraine Prophylaxis [NCT00915473]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Single-centre Clinical Trial Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Intraoperative and Postoperative Continuous Lidocaine Infusion in High Cardiac Risk Vascular Surgery [NCT04691726]Phase 487 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-29Completed
Magnesium Versus High Dose Fentanyl in Attenuating Stress Response to Endotracheal Intubation [NCT04544163]160 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-05Completed
Corticosteroid and Lidocain Injections for Tennis Elbow [NCT02700906]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
A Pilot Study of the Effectiveness of Lidocaine Infusions for the Management of Chronic Pain in Children [NCT02983682]Phase 320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Recruiting
Clinical Study of Neuramis® Volume Lidocaine to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety for Temporary Restoring the Mid-face Volume [NCT02721368]88 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-03Completed
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block With Port Site Infiltration Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [NCT04167176]44 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-15Completed
Randomized Clinical Trial of Oral Diclofenac Potassium With Cervical Lidocaine Cream in Reducing Pain During HSG [NCT02709590]Phase 3140 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Comparison of Strength and Constant Score Pre- and Post-Subacromial Injection for Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears [NCT02693444]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-02Withdrawn(stopped due to Low pool of subjects)
Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Immediate Post-operative Pain, Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT04182828]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-25Recruiting
The Application of External Fractional CO2 Laser Energy Versus Topical Lidocaine for the Treatment of Vestibulodynia in Premenopausal Women on Hormonal Contraception: a Pilot Study [NCT05336825]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-01Completed
A Prospective, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Subject's Satisfaction With the Aesthetics of the Periorbital Area After Treatment of the Upper and/or Mid Face With JUVÉDERM® Fillers and BOTOX®/VISTABEL® [NCT05647551]Phase 473 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-01-05Completed
Ultrasound Guided Platelet Rich Plasma Injections for Post Traumatic Greater Occipital Neuralgia: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study [NCT04051203]Phase 135 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-01Active, not recruiting
Effect of Lidocaine Phonophoresis Versus Pulsed Ultrasound on Myofascial Pain Syndrome in Athletic Children [NCT04185194]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-01Completed
Comparison Between Xylocaine Gel as Endotracheal Cuff Lubricant Versus Dexamethasone 8 mg Intravenously or Both for Sore Throat Prevention Following Intubation: Interventional Study [NCT02682134]Phase 4300 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Completed
The Analgesic Efficacy of Continuous Sub-fascial Bupivacaine Infusion and Lidocaine Patches in Post-cesarean Patients With Opiate Use Disorder: A Comparative Efficacy Analysis [NCT04033562]Phase 42 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-15Terminated(stopped due to limited enrollment and unable to enroll subjects to reach statistical significance)
The Effect of Pregabalin on Pain of Propofol Injection [NCT02668094]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Completed
A Randomised Trial Comparing Methyl Aminolaevulinate Photodynamic Therapy With and Without Ablative Fractional Laser Treatment in Patients With Microinvasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results From a 24-month Follow-up [NCT02666534]Phase 145 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Median Effective Dose of Lidocaine for the Prevention of Pain Caused by the Injection of Propofol Formulated With Medium-/Long-chain Triglycerides [NCT04008433]31 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-16Completed
A Prospective Trial of Zero Versus One Diagnostic Genicular Nerve Blocks to Determine Clinical Outcomes After Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Painful Knee Osteoarthritis [NCT02578108]63 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Does Ultrasound-guided Suprascapular Nerve Block Provide Additional Benefit [NCT02776865]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-31Recruiting
Intraoperative Perineural Injection of Lidocaine for Postlaminectomy Pain [NCT00656526]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Crossover, phase4 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy on Local Anesthesia and Safety of 2% Lidocaine HCl With Different Epinephrine Concentration in Patients Undergoing Surgical Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar [NCT02696369]Phase 465 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
An Open Label, Randomized, Three-treatment, Three-sequence, Three-period, Cross-over, Pharmacokinetic and Adhesion Performance Study of Lidocaine Patch 36 mg/Patch (1.8%) in Fasting, Healthy, Adult, Human Subjects, With Physical Exercise, Heat and Normal [NCT04150536]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-08Completed
Preoperative Viscous Lidocaine for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - a Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial [NCT04725695]Phase 4248 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-29Enrolling by invitation
A Novel Method for Chronic Anal Fissure Treatment: Adipose Derived Regenerative Cells - A Pilot Study [NCT02628522]6 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
Lidocaine Patch (Lidocaine 5%) as a Treatment for Tinnitus and Its Accompanied Symptoms [NCT02750969]Phase 458 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-04-30Recruiting
Lidocaine and Triamcinolone vs Saline Trigger Point Injection for Treatment of Chronic Abdominal Wall Pain [NCT02748395]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to No IRB approval)
Does Stellate Ganglion Block Decrease Stress Response of Intubation? [NCT02732093]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-04-30Not yet recruiting
A Comparison Between Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream (EMLA) Application And Wound Infiltration With Lidocaine For Post Caesarean Section Pain Relief : A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02549105]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-10-31Recruiting
[NCT00851513]Phase 4202 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Plasma Rich in Growth Factors Effectiveness for Myofascial Pain Treatment in Masticatory Muscles: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT04040309]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-10Completed
Traditional Dorsal Digital Block vs Volar Subcutaneous Digital Block [NCT05280704]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
Effect of Erector Spinae (ESP) Block on Opioid Reduction and Enhanced Recovery After Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery [NCT04646707]52 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-17Recruiting
An Open-Label Study of Intraoperative CA-008 Administration in Subjects Undergoing Bunionectomy [NCT03885596]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-25Completed
Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasm [NCT02543411]66 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Average and High Risk Iraqi Population: A Pilot Study [NCT04017845]Early Phase 1537 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-01Completed
Pharmacokinetic Profile of Lidocaine Given as a Weight-based Infusion for Postoperative Surgical Pain Control [NCT05402293]40 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2024-01-15Not yet recruiting
Intranasal Cocaine and Temperature Regulation During Exercise [NCT05809453]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-01Recruiting
Comparison Perioperative Analgesia Efficacy Between Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block for Patients With Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT06082245]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-01Completed
The Female Microbiome in Patients Undergoing Bladder Instillation Therapy [NCT05414305]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-01Active, not recruiting
Comparison of the Hemodynamic Effects of Opioid-based Versus Lidocaine-based Induction of Anesthesia With Propofol in Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT05051007]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-01Recruiting
Regional Anesthesia for Cardiothoracic Enhanced Recovery for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Via Sternotomy [NCT03781440]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-01Active, not recruiting
A Prospective, Open-label Trial of Lidoderm® (Lidocaine Patch 5%)in Painful Diabetic and Idiopathic Neuropathy. [NCT00903851]Phase 476 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine Patch 5% With Celecoxib 200 mg in Patients With Chronic Axial Low Back Pain [NCT00904397]Phase 498 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Rofecoxib was withdrawn from the market due to safety concerns.)
A Prospective, Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Pilot Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lidoderm Patch in the Treatment of Low Back Pain [NCT00904475]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
Trial of Analgesia With Lidocaine or Extended-release Oxycodone for Neuropathic Pain Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis (TALENT-MS) [NCT00414453]Phase 419 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Did not reach enrollment goals)
Analgesic Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Pain Following Adult Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01043211]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Did not have the research staff necessary to follow through with this study.)
An Interventional, Pre-Market, Double-Blinded, Controlled, Two Stages Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel (With and Without Lidocaine) for the Treatment of Soft Tissue Deficits [NCT05853224]72 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-02Recruiting
Comparison of Bupivacaine vs Lidocaine on Inflammatory Regulation Following Endodontic Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT01060774]Phase 411 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Antipruritic Effect of Topical Ketamine, Amitriptyline, and Lidocaine [NCT03096444]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-23Terminated(stopped due to Efficacy was not seen after interim analysis)
A Randomized Comparison Between 1 Plane-2 Injection and 2 Plane-2 Injection Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block (US-SCBPB) in Upper Extremity Surgery [NCT02533557]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
Efficacy of Preoperative Lidocaine Spray and Local Aensthetics-soaked Nasal Packings on Postoperative Pain After Nasal Closed Reduction [NCT03733275]33 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-03Completed
Local Anesthetic Response in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) and Healthy Volunteers [NCT04036305]230 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-07-26Enrolling by invitation
A Randomized, Double-Blind, 2-Way Crossover Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Guanfacine and Lidocaine Combination Versus Lidocaine Alone in Trigeminal Nerve Block for Pain Management in Painful Trigeminal Neuropathy Patients [NCT03865940]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-04Active, not recruiting
Open-label, Multicenter, Uncontrolled, Rater-blinded, Post-market Clinical Follow-up [PMCF] Study to Confirm Performance and Safety of RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine in the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds, Marionette Lines, and/or Cheek Volume Loss [NCT03650387]207 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-17Completed
Effects of Intra-articular Versus Subacromial Steroid Injections on Clinical Outcomes in Adhesive Capsulitis [NCT00742846]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to No enrollment)
Comparison Of Dexmedetomidine, Fentanyl And Lignocaine In Attenuation Of Hemodynamic Response To Direct Laryngoscopy And Intubation In Patient Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [NCT04138472]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-30Recruiting
Jet Lidocaine for Pain Relief During Needle Insertion in a Pediatric Emergency Department. [NCT00681902]150 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Ambulatory Infusions of Lidocaine and Ketamine for Management of Chronic Pain: an Observational Prospective Study [NCT04123652]Phase 4162 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-05Completed
Efficacy of Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine in Sedation for ERCP: a Randomised Placebo-controlled Study [NCT03996577]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-15Recruiting
A Comparison of Lidocaine, Buffered Lidocaine, and Bacteriostatic Normal Saline for Local Anesthesia Prior to Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization [NCT01759459]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Efficacy of External Cold and a Vibrating Device in Reducing Discomfort of Dental Injections in Children - A Split Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02675387]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-31Recruiting
Prospective Randomized Study Comparing 0, 1, and 2 Diagnostic Lumbar Medial Branch (Facet Joint) Blocks Before Radiofrequency Denervation in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cost: Benefit Analysis. [NCT00484159]151 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Effect of Cervical Lidocaine-prilocaine Cream on IUD Insertion Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02658773]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
Continuous Adductor Canal Block With a New Catheter - Primary Placement and Secondary Repositioning [NCT02657603]16 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
Study Looking at Acceptability of Using Ethyl Chloride Spray Versus Subcutaneous Lidocaine Anaesthetic Prior to Contraceptive Implant Insertion [NCT02651207]0 participants (Actual)Observational2016-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to decided not to do study. This will be run as a service evaluation instead)
Phase Ib Randomized, Double-Blind, Latin Square Crossover, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Analgesic Efficacy of VVZ-149 v. Lidocaine v. Placebo in Lumbar Radiculopathy [NCT02644421]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Completed
Intra-Articular 0.5 % Lidocaine Injection Under Ultrasound Guidance in Chronic Knee Pain Due To Osteoarthritis [NCT02632565]Phase 452 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
Contributions to the Elucidation of the Mechanisms and Effects by Which Certain Perianesthetic Interventions Modify Long-term Evolution of Patients With Digestive Cancers Subjected to Surgery [NCT04162535]Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-26Recruiting
Perioperative Systemic Lidocaine for Enhanced Bowel Recovery After Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Dose Dependent Study [NCT02607488]Phase 1/Phase 2180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-30Suspended(stopped due to No fund no enough recruiting centers)
The Effect of Pre-incisional Local Xylocaine Injection on Post Operative Pain and Scar Formation After Cesarean Section [NCT00914498]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-07-31Recruiting
Intensive Monitoring Scheme of Lidocaine Cataplasms [NCT05645302]200 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-04-06Recruiting
Lidocaine Combined With Sufentanil for Preventing Catheter-related Bladder Discomfort After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: a Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial [NCT05957653]Phase 4140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-07Not yet recruiting
Paracervical Block During Office Hysteroscopy: A Randomized Double Blind Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT00811187]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Administration or Epidural Anesthesia on Postoperative Outcomes in Complex Spine Surgery [NCT00840996]116 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
An Exploratory Study in Healthy Volunteers to Identify Factors Influencing Bioequivalence Studies on Moderately Lipophilic Drugs Using Dermal Open Flow Microperfusion (dOFM) [NCT04050826]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-01Completed
Use of Allograft Adipose Matrix for Small Joint Arthritis of the Hand [NCT05747469]Early Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-31Not yet recruiting
Does Rapydan Influence Routine Clinical Chemistry and Hematology Measurements? [NCT00765934]25 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Intraoperative Injection of Exparel Effect on Postoperative Opioid Use in Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery [NCT04085913]Early Phase 1100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-30Enrolling by invitation
Efficacy and Safety of the Lidocaine 5% Patch When Used as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee Receiving Sub-Optimal Pain Relief From Their Current Analgesic Regimen [NCT00589979]Phase 2169 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Randomised, Double-blind Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Reduction of Pain in the Wounds Treatment Previously Applying Lidocaine Topical Solution vs Placebo [NCT02584335]Phase 47 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Difficulties with the recruitment)
Location of Injection of Local Anesthetics in the Adductor Canal Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect on Postoperative Analgesia and Motor Power [NCT02554864]108 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-22Completed
Controlled Hypotension During Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Comparison of Propofol and Magnesium Sulfate [NCT04078659]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-30Not yet recruiting
External Cold and Vibration Stimulation (Buzzy® Device) VS Topical Anesthetic Cream for Procedural Pain Management in Children Undergoing Needle-Related Procedures in the Emergency Department : A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial [NCT02616419]354 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-15Completed
A Mechanistic Evaluation of the Nociceptive Desensitization Induced by Repeated Administration of Topical Local Anaesthetic Mixture of Lidocaine and Prilocaine (EMLA) in a Model of Histaminergic and Non-histaminergic Itch. [NCT04076865]26 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-15Completed
Effects of Perioperative Lidocaine and Ketamine Infusions on Acute Functional Recovery After Abdominal Hysterectomy [NCT00721110]64 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Futility)
Prospective Randomize Trial Comparing Corticosteroid Injection to High Energy Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Lateral Epicondylitis [NCT02613455]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-07-31Recruiting
Painless Subconjunctival Antibiotic and Antifungal Injection in Corneal Ulcer Patients. [NCT00789646]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Very slow in enrolling participants)
Comparison of the Healing of Chemotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis Using Oral Defense Toothpaste Versus Crest Toothpaste and Magic Mouth Rinse [NCT02606994]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-29Terminated(stopped due to Lack of enrollment)
Comparison of Effectiveness Between the Combination of Lidocaine Sprayed at Laryngeal Inlet and on the Cuff of Endotracheal Tube Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Reducing Cough During Extubation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04090112]164 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-01Completed
Pilot Study of Transforaminal Epidural Injection of Clonidine for the Treatment of Acute Lumbosacral Radiculopathy [NCT00588354]26 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Targeted enrollment was not reached.)
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of ARTHRO -Distension Plus Intensive Mobilisation in Shoulder Capsulitis [NCT00724113]Phase 366 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Comparison Of The Analgesia Obtained By Infiltration Of Lidocaïne 1% And Ropivacaïne 0,75% Versus Placebo For The Joinings Of Episiotomies Among Parturients Under Epidural Analgesia [NCT00727935]Phase 4165 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Normal Sensation and Pain in Healthy Volunteers (Carl Koller Grant) (The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Allodynia) [NCT00657358]22 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Improving Pain Control in Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Intravenous Lidocaine Versus Placebo [NCT04096170]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-21Recruiting
Effectiveness and Tolerability of Lidocaine 5% Spray in Treatment of Lifelong Premature Ejaculation Patients. A Randomized Single-blind Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial. [NCT04062357]Phase 2150 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-20Completed
Evaluation of Analgesia With the Use of Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics (Lidocaine and Prilocaine) and Oral Solution of Glucose to 25% in Preterm Neonates During Arterial Puncture and / or the Installation of Percutaneous Catheter [NCT00808054]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
A Contrast of Buffered Vs. Unbuffered Lidocaine in Bone Marrow Biopsies [NCT00456872]49 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
[NCT02593370]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Articaine Efficacy and Safety in Young Children Below Age of Four Years: An Equivalent Parallel Randomized Control Trial [NCT04061265]Phase 1/Phase 2184 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-25Completed
A Pharmacokinetic Study of Synera™ (Lidocaine 70 mg and Tetracaine 70 mg Topical Patch) to Evaluate the Systemic Exposure to Lidocaine and Tetracaine in Neonates and Infants [NCT00747669]Phase 411 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-09-30Suspended(stopped due to Difficulty with enrollment)
Comparison Between Ropivacaine/Dexamethasone and 10% Lignocaine Injection in Distal Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block for Intractable Cancer Pain- A Randomized Trial [NCT04085120]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-23Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial (RDBPCT) of the Effectiveness of the Lidocaine Patch in the Management of Neuropathic Pain After Breast Cancer Surgery [NCT00686127]Phase 421 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Effect of Sodium Bicarbonate Buccal Infiltration on the Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in the Mandibular First Molar With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: a Prospective, Randomized Double-blind Study [NCT02726737]Phase 3100 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
A Study to Evaluate the Effects of Epidural Lidocaine Administration on the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profiles of DepoDur® (Morphine Sulfate Extended-release Injection) in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery [NCT00804609]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
A Safety and Efficacy Study of JUVÉDERM® VOLIFT® With Lidocaine and Restylane® for Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Adults [NCT02558283]175 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-25Completed
Efficacy of Iontophoresis-assisted Ablative Fractional Laser Photodynamic Therapy With Short Incubation Time for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis: 12-month Follow-up Results of a Prospective, Randomised, Comparative Trial [NCT02670655]Phase 145 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
An Investigation of the Contribution of Proximal Vibratory Cues in Tactile Material Perception' [NCT05253508]15 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-01Recruiting
Multicentre Observational Study on the Wound Pain Relief Properties of ORTODERMINA® [NCT03720119]78 participants (Actual)Observational2015-01-27Completed
Intravenous Lidocaine for Pain Associated With Pancreatic Cancer and Chronic Pancreatitis (LIDOPAN) [NCT05906615]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-14Completed
Prevention of Persistent Pain With LidocAine iNfusions in Breast Cancer Surgery (PLAN) [NCT04874038]Phase 31,150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-22Recruiting
The Efficacy Of Lidocaine Patch In The Management Of Postsurgical Neuropathic Pain In Patients With Cancer: A Phase III Double-Blind, Crossover Study [NCT00058357]Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
Corticosteroid Injection as a Predictor of Outcome in Carpal Tunnel Release [NCT00655915]200 participants (Anticipated)Observational2007-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Study was terminated by principal investigator)
A Multicenter Double-Blind Randomized Placebo Controlled Two-Arm Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the Iontophoretic Administration of Lidocaine and Epinephrine Using Lidocaine Iontophoretic Drug Delivery System (IDDS) to Provide Local Anesthesi [NCT00889642]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Use of Tramadol Injections on the Anaesthetic Success Rate of Intraligamentary Injections in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis [NCT05538052]105 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-04-01Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study Comparing Pliaglis™ (Lidocaine and Tetracaine) Cream 7%/7% to Placebo Cream When Applied for 60 Minutes in the Treatment of Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia [NCT00609323]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
A Pilot Study About Safety and Efficacy of Atomized Intrapleural Lidocaine During Pleuroscopy [NCT00693043]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Withdrawn(stopped due to Principal Investigator left the institution requested termination)
Comparison of Different Analgesia Drug Regimens for Pain Control During ESWL for Renal Stones: A Randomized Control Study [NCT02786446]135 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
Fractional CO2 Laser Assisted Topical Articaine Anesthesia vs. Topical EMLA Administration: a Randomized Controlled Study [NCT02548533]Phase 43 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Not enough patients eligible for recruitment.)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine 5% Patch With Placebo in Patients With Pain From Osteoarthritis of the Knee [NCT00904462]Phase 2224 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
"Topic Effects of Eutectic Mixture Use in Local Anesthetics on Hemorrhoidectomy Postoperative (Prospective Study, Randomized, Triple Blind, Placebo-controlled)" [NCT00932542]Phase 2/Phase 3144 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Active, not recruiting
Impact of 5% Lidocaine Medicated Plaster on Allodynic Symptoms of Localized Neuropathic Pain After Knee Surgery [NCT02763592]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
Topical Lidocaine-prilocaine Cream Versus Lidocaine Infiltration for Pain Relief During Repair of Postpartum Perineal Tears: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02883179]Phase 4144 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Multi-center, Double Blind, Intra-Individual Controlled, Active-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Injection With Neuramis® Deep Lidocaine as Compared to Restylane® PERLANE-L in Correction of Nasolabial Fold [NCT02751034]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Perineural Dexamethasone Administered in Femural Nerve Block After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction [NCT02749162]Phase 390 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Completed
Exploring the Potential Efficacy of Lidocaine Gel in Reducing Discomfort in Patients Undergoing Surgical Procedures Requiring Foley Catheter Placement [NCT02709304]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-04-30Not yet recruiting
Treatment of Rotator Cuff Syndrome With Injection of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma [NCT01123889]12 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Hypertonic Saline Enhances The Field of View of Clinicians and Ease of Procedures: A Double Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Intranasal Hypertonic Saline, Xylometazoline, Lidocaine, and Isotonic Saline [NCT04214938]Phase 4200 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-01Completed
The Pharmacokinetics of 4% Lidocaine Gel When Applied Topically to the Breasts [NCT00925353]Phase 413 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Prospective, Controlled, Randomized, Blinded Evaluator, Split-face Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel With Lidocaine Lidocaine for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds [NCT05252325]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-28Not yet recruiting
Investigating the Novel Observation of Right-left Difference in Uterine Artery Vascular Resistance in Pre-eclampsia: A Double-blinded, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Dose-dependent Effect of Epidural Lidocaine on Right-left Uterine Art [NCT00848679]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Withdrawn
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Cutaneous Xylocaine Spray to Reduce Intravenous Cannulation Pain in Adults [NCT02562144]Phase 417 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-05Completed
The Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plan Block in Patients Undergoing ESWL [NCT04213924]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-01Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of Duration of Anesthesia and Patient Satisfaction After Retrobulbar Block Applied in Cataract Surgery [NCT04178200]80 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-12-16Not yet recruiting
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Lidocaine Infusion Plus Ketamine Injection Versus Placebo to Decrease Postoperative Ileus [NCT00229567]60 participants Interventional2005-09-30Terminated(stopped due to insufficient numbers of eligible patients as laparscopic surgery increased and open surgery decreased.)
Comparison of Analgetic Effect of Two Solutions of Intracameral Anesthesia During Cataract Surgery: a Pilot Study [NCT04166578]62 participants (Actual)Observational2017-01-01Completed
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Bilateral 3rd/4th Common Digital Foot Nerve Injections to Treat Restless Legs Syndrome [NCT00656110]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-04-30Recruiting
Comparison of iv Paracetamol, iv Dexketoprofen and Topical Lidocaine in Scorpion Sting: a Placebo Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05125796]106 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-01Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Split-Face Comparison Trial on Topical Anesthetic Agents Prior to Fractional Skin Resurfacing [NCT01842373]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding not secured)
Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00863889]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Withdrawn
The PATCH Trial: Effectiveness and Safety of 5% Lidocaine-medicated Plaster for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia [NCT04570293]Phase 4226 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-01Completed
Evaluation of the Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Pain Relief and Plasma Concentrations of Interleukins (IL-1 and IL-6) and Substance P in Patients With Fibromyalgia [NCT01391598]Phase 340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-01-31Recruiting
A Comparison of Intrauterine Lidocaine Infusion and Paracervical Block for Pain Management in First Trimester Abortions [NCT00613821]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Intravenous Or Topical Lidocaine And Neuromonitoring in Thyroid Surgery (IOLANT Study) [NCT04574947]Phase 4110 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-25Suspended(stopped due to Interim analysis showed futility with accordance to predefined criteria based on conditional power. The study has been stopped prematurely due to futility.)
A Double Blind, Double Dummy, Placebo Controlled Cross Over Study With a Positive Control to Investigate the Effect of a GSK Drug on Electrical Hyperalgesia and Threshold Tracking in Healthy Subjects [NCT00964288]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Terminated(stopped due to During treatment session 3, a subject had a pattern of AEs of severe intensity, suggestive of brainstem toxicity/encephalopathy during lidocaine/saline infusion)
Splint Versus Steroid Injection for DeQuervain's Tenosynovitis: A Randomized Trial [NCT05165875]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-30Not yet recruiting
Effects of Lidocaine, Dexmedetomidine, and Their Combination on Quality of Recovery Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy [NCT04706767]160 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-28Completed
The Effect of Cold Packs, Lidocaine and Flash Lights on Cannulation Pain in Hemodialysis [NCT05822063]Phase 3108 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-25Not yet recruiting
An Open-label, 8-Week Study to Compare the Comfort and Ease of Use of Five Different Treatment Regimens for CNTX-4975-05 Intra-articular Injection in Subjects With Chronic, Moderate-to-Severe Osteoarthritis Knee Pain [NCT03661996]Phase 3854 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-18Completed
Local Anesthesia Effect on Tuberculin Skin Test Results in Infants and Children [NCT00309673]60 participants InterventionalNot yet recruiting
Effects of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine, Lidocaine and Their Combination on Postoperative Inflammation Cytokines After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With General Anesthesia [NCT03276533]160 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-01Completed
Prospective Evaluation of Topical Analgesia Using a Lidocaine/Prilocaine Cream for Laceration Repair in the Emergency Department [NCT03071601]Phase 4132 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-01Completed
Intravenous Lidocaine in the Perioperative Setting and the Effects on Postoperative Pain and Bowel Function Following Cystectomy: A Pilot Study [NCT02924480]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-12Completed
Comparative Study Between the Effect of Ultrasound Guided Median Nerve Block , Radial Nerve Block and Local Infiltration on Feasibility of Radial Artery Cannulation in Patients Undergoing Major Surgeries. A Randomized Control Study [NCT05459792]126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-18Recruiting
Effect of Lidocaine Phonophoresis on Sensory Blockade: Pulsed or Continuous Mode of Therapeutic Ultrasound? [NCT01404468]Early Phase 193 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Buffered vs. Unbuffered Local Anesthesia in Mandibular Molars Diagnosed With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Controlled, Randomized Double-blind Study [NCT05227300]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-14Recruiting
The Hemostatic and Hemodynamic Effects of Adrenaline During Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT00852410]Phase 3140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-03-31Not yet recruiting
Post Operative Functional Restoration in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal and Pelvic Laparoscopic Surgery: Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine [NCT00982618]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Optimization of Local Anesthetic Effect With Duplex Ultrasound Guided Injection of Lidocaine Before Femoral Artery Catheterization: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00903825]Phase 2/Phase 3200 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Paired Study Evaluating S-Caine™ Peel (Lidocaine 7% and Tetracaine 7% Cream) for Induction of Local Dermal Anesthesia for Laser-Assisted Tattoo Removal in Adults [NCT00110734]Phase 360 participants InterventionalCompleted
Propofol Mixed With Lidocaine Versus Lidocaine Pretreatment With Tourniquet for Alleviation of Pain Associated With Propofol Injection [NCT00864682]Phase 4156 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Comparison of J-Tip® Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine, 4% Lidocaine Topical Cream, and J-Tip® Jet Injection of Placebo Prior to Venipuncture and Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion in a Pediatric Emergency Department [NCT00924963]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Study ended due to lack of funding.)
Assessing the Frequency of Lidocaine Ineffectiveness in the General Population vs. Males With ADHD, and Females With ADHD, With or Without PMS [NCT03676725]Early Phase 190 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-14Completed
Effect of Ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Compound Lidocaine on Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparotomy:a Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial [NCT04938882]164 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-15Completed
Multicentric Randomized Double Blind Double Dummy Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial for Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of a Echinacea/Sage Spray in Comparison to a Chlorhexidine/Lidocaine Spray in the Treatment of Acute Sore Throats [NCT00707902]Phase 3154 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Investigation of the Effect of Jet Lidocaine and Ice Application on Reduction of Pain and Anxiety Related to Peripheral Venous Catheterisation in Adult Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT05647889]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-02-15Completed
A Prospective, Monocentric, Uncontrolled Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Stylage® XL Lidocaïne for the Restoration and/or Augmentation of Facial Volume [NCT04166292]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-21Completed
A Comparison of Amethocaine Creams Versus Liposomal Lidocaine Cream as Pain Reliever Prior to Venipuncture in Children at the Paediatric Emergency Department. [NCT00353002]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Withdrawn
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block to Treat Shoulder Pain After Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blinded Trial [NCT04101019]76 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-30Not yet recruiting
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block to Prevent Shoulder Pain After Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery [NCT02809755]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-08Withdrawn(stopped due to While 33 people signed consent, no one was enrolled in the study, because none of these patients developed shoulder pain in the recovery room.)
Efficacy and Safety of Articaine and Lidocaine in Extraction of Wisdom Teeth of Upper and Lower Jaws [NCT05804630]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-15Enrolling by invitation
Evaluation of the Filler Performance on the Nasolabial Folds of Aliaxin® EV With and Without Lidocaine 0.3%: Comparison Within Subjects (Half Face Method) [NCT03273556]27 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-28Completed
Pain Perception Associated With Administration of Buffered Lidocaine Versus Conventional Lidocaine in the Pediatric Dental Patient [NCT04055116]Phase 464 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-11Completed
A Comparative Study Between Atomization and Nebulization for Airway Topicalization During Awake Nasotracheal Fiberoptic Intubation [NCT05320731]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-20Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine Infusion Treatment in Management of Neuropathic Pain: Randomized, Controlled, Comparative Study [NCT02597257]Phase 244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-08-31Recruiting
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Administering Lidocaine Spray in Oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy [NCT02733471]Phase 4586 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block to Treat Shoulder Pain After Thoracotomy- An Open Label Pilot Study [NCT02733393]Phase 12 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Pilot Study of Stellate Ganglion Injection With Anesthetic as a Method to Provide Relief From Hot Flushes [NCT00992914]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
[NCT00590590]Phase 2105 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Pupillometry - Future of Objective Pain Reaction Measurement While Unconscious [NCT04000126]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-25Completed
Randomized Clinical Trial of Oral Hyoscine Butyl Bromide With Cervical Lidocaine Cream in Reducing Pain During Hysterosalpingography [NCT02710305]Phase 2140 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
Instilled Lidocaine vs Placebo for Pain Management During Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) Dressing Changes. [NCT00585325]15 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
A Phase 1b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Pharmacodynamic Study of BIIB095 and BIIB074 in Healthy Participants and Participants With Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy [NCT04106050]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor Decision)
The Effect of Buffered Lidocaine Versus Nonbuffered Lidocaine on Pain Scores During Infiltration for Vulvar Biopsies [NCT02698527]128 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
Effect of Palatable Lidocaine Gel Versus Dexmedetomidine on Gag Reflex During Propofol Based Sedation for Patients Undergoing Elective Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT04213833]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-01Completed
Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Lidocaine Spray Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone in Relieving Pain During Levonorgestrel IUD Insertion [NCT04339361]Phase 4111 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-25Not yet recruiting
How Related Are Speech Production and Reading? An Investigation of the Impact of Motor Tasks and Lidocaine on Reading Unfamiliar Words in Adults With and Without Dyslexia [NCT05854082]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-27Active, not recruiting
Assessment of the Efficacy of an Intradiscal Injection of Corticoids in Modic I Discopathies. [NCT01694134]Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-12Completed
Effect of Different Anesthetic Techniques for Isolated Systolic Hypertensive Patients of Abdominal Surgery on Postoperative Hospital Stay and morbidity---a Prospective, Randomized Study [NCT01884298]180 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Use of Ultiva ® Associated With Xylocaine ® in the Procedures of Feticide: A Phase III Randomized Trial [NCT02597699]Phase 366 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-18Completed
The Effect of Perioperative Lidocaine on Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Randomized, Double - Blinded, Placebo Controlled Study [NCT01930877]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Withdrawn by PI)
A Comparison of Cognitive-behavioral Couple Therapy and Lidocaine in the Treatment of Provoked Vestibulodynia: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT01935063]108 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-06Completed
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Topical Morphine Compared With a Routine Mouthwash in Managing Cancer Treatment-induced Mucositis in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer in Isfahan [NCT01837446]Phase 2/Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
Use of Intravenous Lidocaine in the Prevention of Postoperative Vomiting in Elective Tonsil Surgery, With or Without Adenoids [NCT01986309]Phase 492 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Assessing the Effective Method of Pain Reduction After the Placement of Conventional Separators [NCT05777122]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-10Enrolling by invitation
The Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine on Postoperative Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery [NCT00840918]123 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Problem with enrollment)
Glossopharyngeal Nerve Blockade for Awake Videolaryngoscope Assisted Endotracheal Intubation in the Morbidly Obese. [NCT01791439]24 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-01-31Recruiting
Phase One Study and Two of a New Method for Local Analgesia [NCT00791024]Phase 1/Phase 2126 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Amiodarone, Lidocaine or Neither for Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) or Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) [NCT01401647]Phase 33,024 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Sexual Dysfunction in Gynecologic Oncology Patients [NCT03801031]Phase 44 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-06Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine on ED50, ED95 and NTI Values of Propofol Induced Unconsciousness [NCT05573191]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-08Not yet recruiting
Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Hysterosalpingo-lidocaine-foam Sonography Versus Hysterosalpingography in Tubal Patency Assessment to the Gold Standard of Laparoscopy and Dye Testing [NCT05419921]105 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-07-01Recruiting
Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine on Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Urological Surgery: A Prospective, Randomised, Placebo Controlled, Double-blind, Phase III Study [NCT00789620]Phase 376 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Effect on Postoperative Sore Throat of Lidocaine Jelly Application Over the Endotracheal Tube of Tapered-shaped Cuff [NCT02952157]Phase 4210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-30Not yet recruiting
Prevention of Laryngeal Reflexes in Minimal Invasive Parathyroid Surgery by the Use of Topical Lidocaine [NCT00528502]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Terminated due to no patient enrollment.)
Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Mixture of Ketamine / Lidocaine Administered by Mesotherapy in the Management of Neuropathic Pain in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1 (CRPS1). A Monocentric Randomized and Controlled Clinical Study [NCT04650074]Phase 2/Phase 336 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-05Recruiting
Infiltration of Neuromas With Local Anesthetics to Eliminate Pain: A Double-blinded Crossover Study [NCT02930551]12 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
Vurdering af Perifere GABAA-receptorer Med Henblik på Lokal Smertelindring [NCT02928328]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-31Recruiting
The Effect of Thoracolumbar Paravertebral Block or Intravenous Lidocaine and Ketamine Versus Standard Care on Acute and Chronic Pain After Inguinal Herniorrhaphy [NCT00720330]12 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Enrollment challenges prohibited study progression.)
Pain Reduction During Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy of the Prostate: Intravenous Diazepam, Local Periprostatic Nerve Block or Combination [NCT02935972]Phase 2/Phase 3336 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Manifestations of Fibromyalgia [NCT00986505]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
The Effect of Intracervical Lidocaine Versus Intramuscular Diclofenac for Pain Relief During Hysterosalpingography Among Infertile Women In A Tertiary Hospital In Kano: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02918812]Phase 4140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-09-30Recruiting
A Prospective, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of the Effectiveness And Safety Of Lidoderm® As Add-On Treatment in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia, Diabetic Neuropathy, or Low Back Pain [NCT00904020]Phase 4107 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study Evaluating Saypha® VOLUME Lidocaine* for the Correction of Nasolabial Fold [NCT04883632]110 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-05Completed
The Combined Use of Intranasal Lignocaine Spray and Oral Lignocaine Gel to Reduce the Pain and Trauma Associated With Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Hospitalised Children. [NCT01075789]13 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Failure to recruit)
Sciatic Block in Contralateral Limb for Treatment of Refractory Phantom and Residual Limb Pain; a Triple-Blind Randomized Crossover Controlled Trial [NCT05046639]Phase 420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-01Recruiting
Comparison of Different Analgesic Methods for Reducing Pain From Adult Intramuscular Influenza Virus Vaccine Injection [NCT01006187]Phase 3352 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Retrospective Investigation of Postoperative Pain Perception After Laparoscopic Tubal Sterilization [NCT01062087]62 participants (Actual)Observational2010-01-31Completed
A Subject- and Evaluator-Blinded, Randomized, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Injection With DGE Injectable Gel as Compared to an FDA-Approved Dermal Filler in Subjects Undergoing Cutaneous Correction of Nasolabial Folds [NCT00444626]Phase 3140 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Dose-effect of Propofol for Anesthetic Induction: Double-blind Comparison of Different Propofol Formulations Administered Alone or With Lidocaine [NCT01041872]Phase 4212 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind Controlled Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Cervical and Thoracic Interlaminar Epidural Injections in Thoracic and Cervical Disc Herniation, Discogenic Pain, and Post-Cervical Laminectomy Syndrome [NCT01071369]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Comparison of the Efficacy of Prolotherapy Injection Therapy and Local Anesthetic (Lidocaine) Injection Therapy in Myofascial Pain Syndrome. [NCT05239091]28 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-08-01Completed
Comparison of the Efficacy of Local Anesthetic and Ozone Injection in Patients With Myofascial Pain Syndrome [NCT05318560]72 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-30Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Short-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [NCT01062906]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Intralesional Injection of Steroids and/or Botulinum Toxin Type A in Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids for Pain Improvement [NCT03982862]Phase 420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-30Recruiting
Neuroprotective Effects of Lidocaine on Early Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroscopy With Beach Chair Position: a Randomized Trial [NCT04634656]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-07Recruiting
Creation of Arteriovenous Ante-brachial Fistula Under Axillary Block Versus Local Anesthesia : Impact on Early Complications [NCT02722096]78 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
Effect of Local Anesthesia in Patients With Marginal Periodontitis Undergoing Scaling and Root Planning [NCT01878864]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Too slow patient inclusion and superior effect of the injection)
The Efficacy of Analgesic Buffering With Sodium Bicarbonate for the Pediatric Dental Patient [NCT01883232]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Withdrawn
[NCT01907997]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Anesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine (Mandibular Infiltration) and 2% Lidocaine (Alveolar Nerve Block), Associated With 1:100.000 Epinephrine, in Lower Molars With Irreversible Pulpits [NCT01912755]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Can Intravenous Lidocaine Decrease the Minimal Inducing Dose of Etomidate?: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Dose-response Study. [NCT01916642]Phase 1100 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
The Efficacy of Systemic Lidocaine Versus Ultrasound-guided Adductor Canal Block for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Randomized, Double-blinded, Non-inferiority Study [NCT04828083]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-01Recruiting
Perioperative Protective Effects of Lidocaine - Clinical Study on the Route and Timing of Administration [NCT00413127]Phase 2/Phase 378 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Less patients than expected for inclusion, therefore patient recruitment is to low)
Investigating the Effect of a Perioperative Analgesia Protocol on Postoperative Opioid Usage and Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Major Head and Neck Cancer Surgery Requiring Microvascular Free Flap Reconstruction [NCT04176419]Phase 330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-17Active, not recruiting
Diclofenac Suppository As a Preemptive Analgesia in Ultrasound Guided Biopsy of Prostate: Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01939743]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome With Lidocaine Injection and Physical Therapy, Alone or in Combination: a Single-blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. [NCT01250184]Phase 4127 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Double-blinded Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CLIFE1 and CLIFE2 Gels in Benign Anorectal Surgery [NCT02961855]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
[NCT00209885]Phase 460 participants Interventional2005-10-31Not yet recruiting
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Needle Tenotomy With Platelet Rich Plasma (Leukocyte Depleted)in Epicondylitis [NCT01945528]Phase 386 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Intravenous Lidocaine in Carcinologic ENT Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial for Evaluation of Opioid Saving Strategy and Chronic Post-surgical Pain [NCT02894710]Phase 3143 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-31Completed
a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial on the Safety and Efficacy of Different Doses of Lidocaine Infusion for Postoperative Analgesia in Elderly Patients With Colorectal Cancer Surgery [NCT05412576]220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-01Recruiting
The Effect of Perioperative Systemic Lidocaine on Quality of Recovery After Cesarean Delivery [NCT02257346]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-01Withdrawn(stopped due to PI terminated study with no subjects enrolled.)
Efficiency of Multi-Modal Anesthesia (MMA) Protocol in Pain Control and Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery [NCT05413902]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-05Completed
Subconjunctival Injection of Local Anesthetic in Anterior Blepharoptosis Repair [NCT02959697]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-09-01Recruiting
A Phase IV Randomized, Single-Blind Trial of Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel®) for Pain Control in Costal Cartilage Harvest [NCT05285566]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-04Recruiting
"A RCT ON CLINICAL EFFICACY OF 1% vs. 2% LIGNOCAINE IN COUGH SUPPRESSION AND PAIN RELIEF IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING FLEXIBLE BRONCHOSCOPY" [NCT01955824]Phase 2/Phase 3500 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
[NCT01955967]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Double Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial of the Efficacy of Topical 2% Lidocaine for the Treatment of Symptomatic Hemorrhoids [NCT01961739]Phase 2/Phase 3138 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-10-31Recruiting
Cutaneous Microcirculation and Diabetic Foot [NCT01963559]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
Steroid and Sodium Hyaluronate Hydrodilatation [NCT05861570]84 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-18Recruiting
Evaluation of Local Anesthesia Before Arterial Puncture for Blood Gas Analysis Randomized, Control Placebo Study [NCT01964248]Phase 3136 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
Phase 4 Study of Comparison of Preincisional Infiltrated Dexmedetomidine and Lidocaine Plus Adrenaline for Surgical Conditions and Postoperative Analgesic Consumption in Nasal Sephoplasty Surgery. [NCT01964586]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Paracervical Block With Lidocaine as a Modality to Decrease IUD Insertion Related Pain [NCT01967017]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding was denied.)
A Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of Etoreat®(Etodolac-Lidocaine Topical Patch) in the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain [NCT01968005]Phase 3232 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
A Multicenter, Evaluator-blinded, Randomized, No-treatment Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of JUVÉDERM VOLBELLA With Lidocaine Injectable Gel for Correction of Infraorbital Hollowing in Chinese Population [NCT05088980]Phase 3160 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-19Completed
Prospective, Multi-site Study to Evaluate Subject Satisfaction With Facial Appearance Overall and the Aesthetic and Psychosocial Impact of Combined Facial Treatment [NCT04609020]Phase 464 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-02-15Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Control Trial Evaluating the Utility of Multimodal Opioid-free Anesthesia on Return of Bowel Function in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery [NCT04144933]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-15Recruiting
Can we Gain an Advantage by Combining Distal Median, Radial and Ulnar Nerve Blocks With Supraclavicular Block? A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT01989312]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Acupuncture Augmentation of Lidocaine for the Treatment of Provoked, Localized vulvodynia-a Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Study [NCT01996384]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
Monovision Correction Versus Multifocal Lens Insertion Following Emulsification Cataract Surgery [NCT01998698]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Efficacy of Epidural Steroid in Controlling Postoperative Pain After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Double-blinded Controlled Trial [NCT02001259]Phase 4108 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Buffered vs Plain Lidocaine for Local Nasal Anesthesia [NCT04583137]Early Phase 180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-01Not yet recruiting
Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial Comparing Arthrographic Joint Distention With Steroid and Local Anesthetic Versus Arthrographic Joint Distention With Local Anesthetic Alone [NCT02001740]Phase 4108 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
The Effect of Intranasal Vasoconstrictor Medications on Hemodynamic Parameters: A Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. [NCT02285634]68 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Safety and Efficacy Study of Hya-Dermis Mixed With Lidocaine Injection for the Improvement of Nasolabial Folds [NCT02006173]0 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn
Safety and Efficacy of Lidocaine Infiltration in Suction Assisted Lipectomy With Tumescent Technique. A Randomized, Double Blinded, Controlled Trial. [NCT00591487]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-12-31Enrolling by invitation
Randomized Clinical Trial: Comparison in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis by Iontophoresis Versus Ultrasound. [NCT04917406]76 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-20Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Intratracheal Dexmedetomidine Versus Lidocaine for Smooth Tracheal Extubation in Patients Undergoing Eye-surgery. [NCT05291221]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-22Completed
Lessons on Urethral Lidocaine in Urodynamics (LULU): Impact of Intraurethral Lidocaine on Cystometric Parameters and Discomfort [NCT04038099]Phase 463 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-14Completed
[NCT02007408]108 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
The Role of Intra-operative Lidocaine Infusion in Preventing Chronic Post Surgical Pain After Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery [NCT02862769]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-01Recruiting
[NCT02020551]223 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Does Topical Lidocaine Decrease Sweat During Exercise in the Heat? [NCT05379283]22 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-15Not yet recruiting
Routine Irrigation With Ropivacaine vs. Lidocaine vs. Saline of Surgical Bed in Sleeve Gastrectomy [NCT02023684]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-01-31Not yet recruiting
Impact of Local Anesthesia Type on Cancer Detection Rate in Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy [NCT02025361]Phase 4422 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Effects of Adrenaline Infiltration on Surgical Field of View in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery [NCT05867342]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-12Completed
An Estimate of the ED95 of Lidocaine 1.0% for Filling the Adductor Canal When Placing an Adductor Canal Block in Healthy Volunteers [NCT02033356]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Comparative Study Between the Hemodynamic Responses of Dexmedetomidine, Lidocaine or Propofol Infusions During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [NCT05937282]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-01Recruiting
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Topical Tramadol Versus Topical Lidocaine in the Control of Post Operative Pain in Children After Tonsillectomy [NCT05928520]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-01Not yet recruiting
LIDOCAINE SPRAY VERSUS VISCOUS LIDOCAINE SOLUTION PLUS LIDOCAINE SPRAY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING NON-SEDATED ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL [NCT06185933]250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-04Enrolling by invitation
Potential Role of Intravenous Lidocaine Versus Intravenous Ketamine for Pain Management in Fibromyalgia Patients [NCT06184958]Phase 475 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-02Recruiting
Comparing Intravenous Versus Nebulized Either Lidocaine or Dexmedetomidine for Attenuation of the Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Intubation [NCT05941767]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-07-12Active, not recruiting
A Prospective, Observational Study of the Volumizing Effect of Open-Label Aesthetic Use of VOLUMA® in the Mid-Face Area [NCT01559064]115 participants (Actual)Observational2012-02-29Completed
Non-anesthesiologist-administered Propofol is Not Related to a Higher Increase in Transcutaneous CO2 Pressure During the Flexible Bronchoscopy Compared to Guideline-based Sedation: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02820051]91 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
Comparison of Quadratus Lumborum Block With Medical Management for Pain Control After Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery [NCT04588389]Phase 330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-01Recruiting
Does Sodium Bicarbonate Reduce the Pain of Lidocaine for Local Anesthesia in Percutaneous Breast Biopsies? [NCT02288364]Phase 488 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
Phase 1 Novel Topical Treatment for Post-herpetic Neuralgia [NCT00566904]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Nalbuphine as an Adjuvant to Intravenous Regional Anesthesia [NCT02678585]106 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
An Open Label, Single-treatment, Single-period, Single-application, Adhesion Performance Study of Lidocaine Patch 36 mg/Patch (1.8%) in Healthy, Adult, Human Subjects. [NCT04312750]Phase 154 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Use of Topical Lidocaine (Lidoderm 5% Patch) to Reduce Pain in Patients With Diabetic Neuropathy: Does the Density and Subtype of Sodium Channels Affect Response? [NCT01086150]Phase 2/Phase 351 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
The Effect of Systemic Intraoperative Lidocaine on Postoperative Pain and Quality of Recovery on Morbid Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Surgery [NCT01180660]51 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
the Effect of Ethyl Chloride Spray on Propofol Injection Pain [NCT02770690]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
Sciatic Block in Contralateral Limb for Treatment of Refractory Phantom and Residual Limb Pain; a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT06045936]Phase 420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
Treatment of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department: Comparison Between Magnesium Sulfate and Lidocaine. A Double-blind, Randomised Controlled Trial. [NCT05653401]Phase 2800 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-11-20Completed
Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Local Anaesthetic Application in Spray for the Repair of 1st- 2nd Perineal Lacerations Following Vaginal Delivery [NCT05201313]Phase 3136 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-20Completed
IV vs. Erector Spinae Plane Blocks-Cardiac Surgery [NCT04995497]Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-15Active, not recruiting
A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blinded Trial of Ketamine Versus Lidocaine Infusions for Multimodal Pain Management in Traumatic Rib Fracture Patients [NCT04781673]Phase 474 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-01Recruiting
Intravenous Lidocaine for Effective Pain Relief After Thyroidectomy: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study [NCT01608360]Phase 456 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-07-31Recruiting
The Comparison of Antiarrhythmic and Myocardial Protective Effect Between Lidocaine, Dexmedetomidine, and Their Combined Infusion in Subjects Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft [NCT01688648]160 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
Use of a Marker for Cartilage Damage to Differentiate the Diagnosis of Femural Acetabular Impingement From Extraarticular Pathologies. [NCT02880085]20 participants (Actual)Observational2015-02-28Completed
Effects of Intravenous Local Anesthetic on Bowel Function After Colectomy [NCT00600158]Phase 345 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
The Interest of the Xylocaine® and Ketamine on the Per and Postoperative Management of Acute and Chronic Postoperative Pain After Colectomy by Laparoscopy [NCT02969733]Phase 2/Phase 3135 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Intra-peritoneal Lignocaine With Bupivacaine After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00950625]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Hematoma Blocks in Forearm Fractures: An Effective Adjunct to Procedural Sedation? [NCT00763880]Phase 489 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment was taking longer than originally anticipated.)
A Double Blind Randomized Controlled of Placebo and Nebulized Lidocaine for Migraine Headache [NCT00287781]150 participants Interventional2002-01-31Completed
The Study of Perioperative Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine on Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Single-port Thoracoscopic [NCT04043624]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-01Recruiting
Nebulized Lidocaine Versus Placebo to Prevent Cough at Emergence From Anesthesia: a Double Blind Prospective Randomised Trial [NCT04000633]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-01Recruiting
Efficacy of Combined Ultrasound Guided Steroid Injection and Splinting in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome [NCT02708693]52 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
the Research of Analgesia and Sedation Effect of Remifentanil on ICU Short Operation [NCT02635802]Phase 41,500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-12-31Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Propofol,Sevoflurane and Paracervical Block for Uterine Curettage [NCT00733564]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Prospective Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of the Effect of Preoperative Analgesia With Local Lidocaine Infiltration for Pain Management Post Cesarean Delivery. [NCT00737542]0 participants InterventionalNot yet recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Study Evaluating the Efficacy of S-Caine™ Peel (Lidocaine 7% and Tetracaine 7% Cream) for Induction of Local Dermal Anesthesia Before Vascular Access Procedures in Children [NCT00125255]Phase 381 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
A Single Center, Randomized, Subject & Evaluator-blind, Matched Pairs, Active-controlled Design Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Injection With HARA as Compared to Restylane® Lidocaine in Temporary Correction of Nasolabial Folds [NCT04224649]67 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-23Recruiting
Preventive Application Of Lidocaine Patch In Adjunction To Intravenous Morphine Analgesia For Management Of Post-Thoracotomy Pain: Results Of A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study [NCT02751619]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Comparison of Prescription Lidocaine Patch to Over the Counter Lidocaine Patch and Placebo for Back Pain and Arthritis [NCT02749123]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-04-30Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multiple-dose, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Etodolac-lidocaine Patch Applied Once Daily in Subjects Experiencing Acute Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness [NCT02695381]Phase 3100 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Needle-Free Jet Injection of Lidocaine for Local Anesthesia During Lumbar Puncture: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01224431]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Efficacy of Intraperitoneal Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Postcesarean Pain Relief [NCT02707081]Phase 2/Phase 3150 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Assessment of the Effectiveness of Ultrasound-guided Acupuncture in the Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome [NCT02870673]Phase 2/Phase 372 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-08-31Not yet recruiting
Effects of Addition of Systemic Tramadol or Adjunct Tramadol to Lidocaine Used for Intravenous Regional Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery [NCT02658721]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Comparison Between the Effects of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine and Ketamine on Acute and Chronic Pain After Open Nephrectomy: A Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study [NCT02653651]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
The Effect of Intraoperative Lidocaine Infusion and Intraoperative Lidocaine Combined With Ketamine Infusion on Opioid Consumption After Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04524130]Phase 487 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-01Active, not recruiting
The Effect of Topical Administration of Lidocaine/Nitroglycerin Combination Versus Placebo on Radial Artery Access in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization Via the Radial Artery [NCT01155167]Phase 2/Phase 386 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
Does Topical Lidocaine Reduce The Amount of Intravenous Conscious Sedation Required To Complete Diagnostic Upper Endoscopy and Shorten Recovery Time? A Double Blinded, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study. [NCT02620501]106 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-07-31Recruiting
The Effect of Perioperative Lidocaine Intravenous Infusion on Postoperative Recovery After Spine Surgery. [NCT02762656]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-06-30Not yet recruiting
Shamrock - Ultrasound/MR Image Fusion Guided Lumbar Plexus Block [NCT02718976]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Ultrasound Guided Epidural Block in Axial SPA Patient With Limited Spine Mobility: a Prospective Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04143165]Phase 452 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-12Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Full and a Fractional Ablative Carbon Dioxide Laser as Pretreatment for Photodynamic Therapy in the Management of Superficial Non Melanoma Skin Cancer [NCT03012009]16 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Clinical Trials in Stroke Rehabilitation [NCT00597766]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
Discomfort in Upper Airways Due to intubation-a Randomized Controlled Trial in a Norwegian Hospital [NCT05614609]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-01Recruiting
Intravenous Sedation and Analgesia Using Propofol, Fentanyl and Ketamine (PFK) Versus General Anesthesia in Minor Urological Procedures. [NCT04285528]200 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-17Completed
A New Method for Pain Relief, Intravenous Cannulation in Pediatric Patients; A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial. [NCT04246255]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-03Completed
MILES STUDY - Mesotherapy In Lateral Epicondylitis, a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study [NCT04201249]Phase 2/Phase 382 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-01Recruiting
Management of Malignant Pleural Effusion - Indwelling Pleural Catheter or Talc Pleurodesis ; a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. [NCT02825095]Early Phase 1120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-08-31Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Subtenon and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery: A Comparative Randomized Controlled Double Blind Study [NCT04668456]Phase 375 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-15Active, not recruiting
Effect of Nebulized Lidocaine, Dexmedetomedine and Their Combination on Haemodynamics During Direct Laryngoscopy Surgery. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. [NCT04659057]Phase 4180 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-12Completed
Evaluation of Ketamine and Multi-modal Analgesics for Postoperative Analgesia, Opioid Sparing, and Early Extubation in ICU Compared With Conventional Analgesia [NCT02815111]0 participants (Actual)Observational2016-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Not IRB approved)
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Intravaginal Lignocaine Injection Versus Placebo for Analgesia During Oocyte Recovery in an IVF Cycle [NCT00554424]75 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
Effect of Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Brachial Plexus Block [NCT05767827]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-01Recruiting
Multimodal Analgesia in Cardiac Surgery (Pilot Study) [NCT02734940]Phase 43 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-11Terminated(stopped due to Unable to find participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria)
A Study Comparing Hyaluronic Acid Effectiveness & Evaluating Cheek Results With Restylane [NCT04638816]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-16Completed
Efficacy of Local Infiltration of Tranexamic Acid and Lidocaine in Tonsillar Bed on Postoperative Bleeding and Pain During Tonsillectomy Surgery. [NCT05817474]94 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-05-01Completed
The Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion During and After Major Abdominal Pediatric Surgery. A Randomized Double-blinded Study [NCT01387568]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Intravenous Lidocaine for Preventing Painful Oxaliplatin-induced Peripheral Neuropathy (OIPN) [NCT03254394]Phase 1/Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-15Completed
Acupuncture or Local Anaesthetics for Pain Relief During Perineal Repair After Vaginal Delivery: A Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT00328796]207 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Tolerability of QUTENZATM When Applied After Pre-treatment With Lidocaine or Tramadol in Subjects With Peripheral Neuropathic Pain - A Randomized, Multi-center, Assessor-blinded Study [NCT01416116]Phase 4122 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-06Completed
A Two Part Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of GSK2339345 in Healthy Subjects. Part A: an Open Label, Dose Escalating, Rinse, Gargle and Spit Study. Part B: a Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Control [NCT01494636]Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-17Completed
[NCT01417572]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-01-31Recruiting
Comparative Efficacy of 20% Benzocaine Versus TAC Alternate Gel for Control of Pain of Dental Needle Insertion in the Palate [NCT00846690]Phase 420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-01-31Recruiting
Efficacy of Articaine vs. Lidocaine When Used for Local Infiltration in Pediatric Dental Procedures [NCT03318952]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to The research did not start and the PI transitioned to another institution.)
[NCT01425619]160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Efficacy of Liposome Lidocaine Gel for Topical Anesthesia in the Palatal Mucosa [NCT01425840]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Assessing Systemic and Local Levels of Lidocaine During Surgery for Glioblastoma [NCT04716699]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-20Completed
Post-Operative Pain Control in Children and Infants Undergoing Penoplasty: A Randomized Control Trial of a Local Anesthetic Cream Placebo. [NCT00847093]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Effects of Perioperative Administration of Intravenous Lidocaine in Children Operated on for Acute Generalized Peritonitis [NCT06051630]62 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-01Not yet recruiting
Determination of ED95 of 2% Lidocaine With Epinephrine for Converting Analgesia Epidural Anesthesia in Surgical Epidural in the Labor Current Cesarean [NCT02895022]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-09-05Recruiting
Evaluation of Re-administration of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rAAV9-DES-hGAA) in Patients With Late-Onset Pompe Disease (LOPD) [NCT02240407]Phase 12 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-17Completed
Lidocaine For Neuroprotection During Cardiac Surgery [NCT00938964]550 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Ultrasound-Guided Obturator Nerve Block for Transurethral Procedures - Interadductor Approach [NCT02696733]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-02-29Recruiting
The Use of Ultrasound-Guided Dextrose Prolotherapy in Low Back Pain in Patients With Hypermobile-Type, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome [NCT05279937]Phase 340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-09-30Not yet recruiting
Anesthesia Lumbar Puncture In Children (ALPIC) [NCT02590705]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-31Not yet recruiting
Comparison of 1% Versus 2% Lignocaine for Topical Anaesthesia in Flexible Bronchoscopy [NCT02701179]500 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
Analgetic Efficiency of Single-shot Perineural Low Dose Dexamethasone Added to Infraclavicular Block Anesthesia for Upper Limb Surgery [NCT02698995]Phase 3180 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Completed
Assessment of Topical Mebo Versus Lidocane in Healing Time of Traumatic Oral Ulcer: Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT06184282]28 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-07-01Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Paired, Placebo Controlled Study Evaluating the Duration of Anesthetic Effect Produced by the S-Caine™ Peel (Lidocaine 7% and Tetracaine 7% Cream) When Applied for 30 and 60 Minutes [NCT00110253]Phase 340 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Comparison of the Onset Times and Durations of Actions of Different Local Anesthetic Mixture Solutions Used for Ultrasound-guided Axillary-supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks for Upper Limb Trauma Surgery [NCT03454789]85 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-17Completed
"How Central is Central Post-stroke Pain? Investigating the Role of Peripheral Sensory Input in Maintaining Central Pain" [NCT02148588]8 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Comparative Randomized Controlled Trial Study of General Balanced Anesthesia Based on Opioid and Opioid Sparing Balanced Anesthesia for Cholecystectomy Surgery Via Laparoscopy: Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes [NCT02953210]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-30Enrolling by invitation
Pharmacologic MRI in Cocaine-addiction [NCT01652378]12 participants (Actual)Observational2012-08-31Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Dezocine Pretreatment for Pain Relief in Acne Scar [NCT05861063]Phase 4105 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-11Recruiting
A Randomized, Multi-center, Evaluator-blinded, No-treatment Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Restylane Perlane Lidocaine for Correction of Midface Volume Deficit and/or Midface Contour Deficiency [NCT03097783]169 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-26Completed
Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial of Greater Occipital Nerve Block for the Treatment of Migraine Attacks [NCT03159000]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Project never started - lack of resources and no subjects enrolled)
A Randomized Blinded Controlled Trial of 2% Lidocaine Gel Compared to Standard of Care in Children Undergoing Urethral Catheterization [NCT01690767]Phase 2133 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
A Volunteer Study to Determine the Anesthetic and Analgesic Effect of the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block [NCT04401007]24 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-01Recruiting
A Study Evaluating Use of the Proximal Humerus Intraosseous Vascular Access Site for Anesthesia Patient Positioning [NCT01866514]5 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block in Patients Undergoing Maxillofacial Surgeries: A Randomized Double-blinded Study [NCT05854537]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-20Recruiting
Early Reduction of Post-opeRative Pain and Inflammation to Expedite Return to Function After KNEE Arthroscopy [NCT05149287]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-28Terminated(stopped due to Funding stopped)
Lidocaine Infusion With Enhanced Recovery Program for Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: Effect on Pain and Patient Immunity [NCT05470166]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-20Recruiting
Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Procedural Sedation for Pediatric Orthopedic Reductions [NCT00596050]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
SOOTHER Trial: Study of an Over-the-Counter Ointment to Treat Rectal Itch [NCT05288907]20 participants (Actual)Observational2018-09-01Completed
The Effect of Ketamine - Dexmedetomidine Admixture (Ketodex) on Hemodynamic Stability During Anesthesia Induction in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Two Doses [NCT05948267]Phase 4114 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-31Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Lidocaine to Prevent the Development of Chronic Post-Surgical Pain [NCT01619852]148 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Phase II Study of Lidoderm Patches Prior to Intravenous Catheter Insertion. [NCT00552695]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Intranasal Lidocaine in Acute Management of Pediatric Migraine and Migraine-like Headache: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03806595]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-03Completed
A Multi-center, Evaluator-blinded Study to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of HA Fillers for Lifting, Contouring and Correcting Volume Deficiency of the Midface Using an Individualized Treatment Algorithm [NCT03869450]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-09Completed
Articaine Versus Lidocaine Supplemental Infiltration Efficacy in Irreversible Pulpitis Mandibular Molars After Failed Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block [NCT01496846]Phase 4201 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
SPG Block Versus Placebo to Manage Anxiety at Electronic Dance Music Festivals [NCT05729503]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-06Not yet recruiting
Action of Intra-auricular Topical Lidocaine on Tinnitus [NCT05711641]32 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-09-02Completed
A Randomized Trial Comparing the Combination of Intravenous Lidocaine and Ketorolac to Either Analgesics Alone for ED Patients With Acute Renal Colic [NCT02902770]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Completed
The Use of Local Anesthetic in Intralesional Corticosteroid Injections; A Randomized, Double Blind Controlled Trial [NCT03630198]Phase 431 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-01Completed
Clinical Application of Penile Biological Vibration Threshold for Precise Use of Lidocaine Cream to Treat Primary Premature Ejaculation [NCT05749614]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-01Recruiting
Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in Children [NCT02241096]Phase 12 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of available study participants.)
Effects of Combination Intravenous Dexmedetomidine and Lidocaine on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With General Anesthesia [NCT03809923]240 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-01Completed
For A More Comfortable Bronchoscopy: Is Spray Catheter The Answer? [NCT02372760]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to The PI has relocated and the study has been closed.)
Effect of Tracheal Lidocaine on Intubating Conditions During Propofol-remifentanil TCI Without Neuromuscular Blockade [NCT01489683]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
A Comparison Between Continuous Infusion vs. Patient Controlled Intraabdominal Injection of Local Anesthetics for Treatment of Postoperative Pain After Abdominal Hysterectomy. A Randomized, Double-blind Study. [NCT01492179]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Lidocaine/Tetracaine Patch (Rapydan) for Topical Anaesthesia Before Arterial Access: A Double-blind, Randomized Trial [NCT01494311]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Peripheral Nerve Block in Patients With Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy: How Important is the Peripheral Signaling? [NCT04699734]16 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-08Recruiting
Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical ELA-Max for Anesthesia Prior to Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization in Children [NCT00444756]Phase 470 participants Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Method Evaluation Study of Truview PCD Versus MacIntosh Laryngoscope [NCT01530152]56 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Does Lidocaine Reduce Patient Moving Which Affect the Procedure Proceeding and Improves Surgeon Satisfaction in Labiaplasty [NCT05706987]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-15Not yet recruiting
An Open-Label Pilot Study Evaluating Synera® in the Treatment of Patients With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome [NCT01055444]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Adjunctive Treatment of Residual Periodontal Pockets Using a Hyaluronic Acid-based Gel: A 12-month Multicenter Randomized Triple Blinded Clinical Trial [NCT04702334]144 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
[NCT00440960]Phase 40 participants InterventionalCompleted
The Evaluation of the Combination of Magnesium and Lidocaine for the Pretreatment of Pain That is Caused by the Injection of Propofol. [NCT01342510]Phase 4200 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Efficacy of Repeated Locoregional Anesthetics Blocks With Bupivacaine in Patients Suffering of Chronic Dentoalveolar Pain. (BADDAP) [NCT04207411]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-25Recruiting
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Centre Study to Determine the Effect of Intradermal AZD3161 on Quantitative Sensory Testing Variables in Normal and UVC Exposed Skin in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01240148]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
A Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multi-Center Single Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of URG101 Compared With the Individual Components Lidocaine and Heparin in Subjects With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Sy [NCT02591199]Phase 292 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Prematurely terminated based on interim study analysis)
Topical Anesthesia to Decrease the Trigeminal-Cardiac Reflex During Intra-arterial Injection of Chemotherapy for Retinoblastoma in Children. [NCT02955524]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to I discontinued this study because I transferred to another institution.)
The Effect of Local Anesthesia With Lidocaine During Insertion and Removal of Nasal Packing [NCT04519463]Early Phase 160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-30Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of Topical Liposomal Lidocaine and Oral Sucrose for Treatment of Pain in Newborn Infants Undergoing Venipuncture: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00519207]Phase 3330 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Evaluation of Topical Lidocaine Spray as Adjuvant to Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Children and Teenagers [NCT00521703]Phase 378 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Evaluation of Aerosolized Bupivacaine Versus Pre-incision Lidocaine Versus Instilled Liquid Bupivacaine Versus Post-operative Bupivacaine Injection for Optimization of Post-operative Pain Control in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgical Patients [NCT00508976]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Effect of Self-administered Lidocaine In-situ Gel on Intrauterine Device Insertion Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02943135]Phase 3120 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-01Completed
A Randomized, Open, Parallel-group Multicenter Study of Efficacy and Tolerability of a New Medical Device in Gel Formulation (Hyaluronic Acid 0.54%) Versus Calgel® for the Topical Treatment of Teething in Infants [NCT02931357]Phase 354 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade: A Pharmacokinetic Study of Lidocaine and Adrenaline [NCT00523055]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Clinical volume of patients for recruitment stopped.)
Effect of Different Concentrations of Lidocaine in Relieving Pain Peroperatively and 24 Hours Postoperatively in Wide Awake Hand Surgery Using Tumescent Local Anesthesia Technique [NCT04692896]Phase 190 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-01Completed
Atracurium Mixed With Magnesium Sulfate Versus Atracurium Alone as Adjuvant to Lidocaine in Intravenous Regional Anesthesia [NCT02920905]Phase 375 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Completed
Comparative Effect of Palatal Injection on Pain Perception in Pediatric Patient [NCT06025825]96 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2023-05-02Recruiting
Comparison Between the Effects of Lidocaine Prilocaine Cream and Lidocaine Injection on Reduction of Perineal Pain During Episiotomy and Perineum Repair in Vaginal Delivery: Randomized Control Trial [NCT05891132]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-01Not yet recruiting
Effects of an Opioid Sparing Care Pathway for Patients Undergoing Obesity Surgery [NCT03756961]220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-01Recruiting
Comparison of 1% Versus 2% Lignocaine for Topical Anaesthesia in Endobronchial Ultrasound Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration [NCT02913300]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
Nalbuphine as an Adjuvant to Local Anaesthetic Mixture in Peribulbar Cataract Surgery a Randomized Controlled Study [NCT03436836]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-14Completed
Efficacy of Perioperative US-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural in Adult Patient Undergoing Thoracotomy: A Randomized Comparative Double-Blinded Trial [NCT05672394]74 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-01Completed
An Open Label, Randomized, Two-treatment, Two-period, Single-dose Study Evaluating the Product Adhesion in Healthy, Adult Subjects Using ZTlido 1.8% Topical System and a Generic Lidocaine Patch 5%. [NCT04319926]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-07Completed
Early Intervention Sphenopalatine Ganglion Blocks (SPGBs) Versus Standard Conservative Management of Post Dural Puncture Headache in Obstetric Patients - A Randomized Feasibility Study [NCT04515901]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Unable to enroll participants.)
Efficacy of Alkalinized Lidocaine in the Endotracheal Tube Cuff Compared to a Bolus Dose of Intravenous Remifentanil on the Incidence of Coughing During Emergence of Anesthesia [NCT01451840]85 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
The Effect of Perioperative Systemic Lidocaine on Quality of Recovery After Outpatient Gynecologic Laparoscopy [NCT01250002]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
Efficacy of Mesotherapy Added to Intra-articular Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) in Patients [NCT05329116]42 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-15Recruiting
A Randomized Trial of Bladder Instillations Versus Onabotulinumtoxin A for Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome [NCT04401176]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-15Completed
The Use of Lidocaine Ophtesic Gel Versus Subconjunctival Xylocaine Injection in Pterygium Excision [NCT05978687]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-01Recruiting
A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of ST-01 (Sustained-release Lidocaine Polymer Solution for Injection) in Subjects Undergoing Pelvic Surgery [NCT05193227]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-27Recruiting
Effectiveness of Paracervical Block Versus Lidocaine Spray During Endometrial Biopsy Under Oral Analgesic Drugs; A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01908738]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Effect of Intra-cuff Lidocaine and Tetracaine on Tracheal Tube-induced Emergence Phenomena [NCT00798018]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Continuous Infusion of Lidocaine Versus Blockade of the Erector Spinae Plane Block - Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy in Patients After Bariatric Surgery [NCT05700214]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-16Recruiting
The Effects on Betadine 5% Penetration When Using Lidocaine 2% Jelly Versus Topical Tetracaine 0.5% for Topical Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery. [NCT00827073]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Effect of Continuous Intravenous Lidocaine on Early Rehabilitation in Bariatric Surgery. A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Study [NCT03211455]Phase 3180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-01Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Crossover Trial of the Use of Subcutaneous Lidocaine Infusion (SCLI) for Chronic Cancer-related Pain [NCT01384877]Phase 2/Phase 333 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Opioid-free Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol, Dexmedetomidine and Lidocaine Infusions for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; Comparison With Propofol, Remifentanil Infusions [NCT01833819]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of PavéDerm J-Fill Soft Dermal Filler vs. Restylane® Lyft Lidocaine in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds. [NCT05040594]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-26Completed
IRB-HSR# 13957: IV Lidocaine for Patients Undergoing Primary Breast Cancer Surgery: Effects on Postoperative Recovery and Cancer Recurrence [NCT01204242]Phase 278 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-01Completed
A Single Center, Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Study of Topical Endoluminal Pancreatic Duct Lidocaine for Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis [NCT00953199]506 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Addition of Lidocaine to Levobupivacaine Reduces Intrathecal Block Duration: Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01675895]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Effect of Intraperitoneal and Intravenous Lignocaine on Pain Relief Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT01717222]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Buffered Lidocaine for Paracervical Block to Decrease Injection Pain During First Trimester Uterine Aspirations [NCT03107754]Phase 498 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-15Completed
Lidocaine as an ETT Cuff Media in the Immediate Post-operative Cardiac Surgery Patient Population, and Its Effect on Sedation/Analgesia Requirements: a Pilot Study [NCT03343080]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-27Completed
Placebo Controlled Trial, Testing the Efficacy of Polidocanol Injections as a Treatment of Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy. [NCT00377910]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Analgesia for Neonatal Circumcision: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of EMLA Versus Combination of EMLA, Sucrose and Dorsal Penile Nerve Block or Ring Block [NCT02990364]Phase 370 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Effect of Topical Xylocaine for Pain Relief During Hysterosalpingography Among Infertile Women in Zaria, Nigeria: A Randomised Controlled Trial. [NCT03802032]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-01Completed
Facet Versus Trigger Point Injection for Management of Chronic Muscular Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Creation of a Clinical Prediction Algorithm [NCT01808586]Phase 243 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in the Management of Post-operative Pain in Colorectal Patients [NCT01836614]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study was closed due to recommendations of performing a PK study first.)
[NCT01485939]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-11-30Recruiting
Multimodal Narcotic Limited Perioperative Pain Control With Colorectal Surgery as Part of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol: A Randomized Prospective Single- Center Trial. [NCT02958566]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Recruiting
Spinal Anesthesia With Articaine and Lidocaine for Outpatient Surgery: A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. [NCT00247741]Phase 380 participants Interventional2005-11-30Completed
Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Long Term Postoperative Pain After Spinal Fusion Surgery [NCT03030560]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
NS1209 and Lidocaine in Patients With Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study [NCT00258622]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
An Open-Label Safety Study to Evaluate the Use of S-Caine™ Peel (Lidocaine 7% and Tetracaine 7% Cream) in Adult Patients Undergoing a Minor or Major Dermal Procedure [NCT00107835]Phase 3408 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Paired Study Evaluating S-Caine™ Peel (Lidocaine 7% and Tetracaine 7% Cream)for Induction of Local Dermal Anesthesia for Dermal Filler Injection on the Face of Adults [NCT00110760]Phase 370 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic and Open Pancreatectomies [NCT02623803]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
4% Intrauterine Lidocaine Infusion for Pain Management in First Trimester Abortions [NCT00121329]80 participants InterventionalCompleted
Pilot Randomized Control Trial: Comparing the Effectiveness of Buzzy Versus Intradermal Lidocaine for Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation in Adults [NCT04647084]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-10-15Withdrawn(stopped due to The investigators were unable to begin work on this study.)
Microneedle Pretreatment as a Strategy to Improve the Effectiveness of Topical Anesthetics Formulations [NCT05267938]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-01Completed
Imaging Modalities for Melanoma Screening and Diagnosis [NCT03699995]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-18Recruiting
Pregabalin and Lidocaine in Breast Cancer Surgery to Alter Neuropathic Pain (PLAN): A Pilot Trial [NCT02240199]Phase 3100 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Feasibility Study: Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Liposome-encapsulated Lidocaine Topical Anesthetic for Reducing Discomfort Associated With Ultherapy™ Treatment [NCT01708447]16 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
Lidocaine and Ketamine Levels in Plasma After Simultaneous Lidocaine/Ketamine Infusions. An Observational Assessment of Therapy Effects and Side-effects. [NCT05906121]15 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-05-16Recruiting
A Randomized Trial Comparing Intrathecal Morphine and Intraoperative Lidocaine Infusion to Epidural Anesthesia With Postoperative PCA for Patients Undergoing Exploratory Laparotomy on the Gynecologic Oncology Service. [NCT05017246]Phase 2174 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-18Recruiting
Effectivness of Tramadol or Topic Lidocaine on Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection. [NCT05831761]83 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-01Completed
Recovery Parameters and Nociception Levels in Opioid-free Versus Opioid Based Anesthesia for Thyroidectomy [NCT05243940]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-07Recruiting
Parameters in Fractional Laser Assisted Delivery of Topical Anesthetics: Role of Anesthetic and Application Time [NCT03279757]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-01Completed
A Double-Blind Randomized Study On Lidocaine Vs. Placebo Pain Control During Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy [NCT00441532]50 participants Interventional2005-08-31Completed
An Open-Label Safety Study to Evaluate the Use of S-Caine™ Peel (Lidocaine 7% and Tetracaine 7% Cream) in Pediatric Patients Undergoing a Minor or Major Dermal Procedure [NCT00107822]Phase 380 participants Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Characterization of Pain Processing Mechanisms in Irritable Bowel Syndrome [NCT00108446]Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Paired Study Evaluating the Efficacy of S-Caine™ Peel (Lidocaine 7% and Tetracaine 7% Cream) in Providing Local Dermal Anesthesia for Non-Ablative Facial Laser Resurfacing in Adults [NCT00110747]Phase 354 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
A Study of the Effect of Time on Topical Anesthetic Efficacy. [NCT00353041]90 participants Interventional2006-07-31Recruiting
Effect of Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block With Compound Lidocaine and Esketamine on Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery: a Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial [NCT05964985]160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-06Not yet recruiting
A Randomised, Open, Controlled, Parallel Group, Multi-Centre Phase II Clinical Study of Lidocain Pertubation as Treatment for Couples With Unexplained Infertility [NCT00449449]Phase 2330 participants Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Effect of Subcutaneous Xylocaine 2% on the Incidence of Vasovagal Reactions and Pain Intensity During Femoral Artery Sheath Removal. [NCT00465439]78 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Spinal Anaesthesia for Knee Arthroscopy: Does Lignocaine Shorten the Effect of Bupivacaine? [NCT01245868]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Contribution of Urethral Sensory Feedback in Voiding Efficiency [NCT02823431]23 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
Anesthetic Efficacy of 4% Buffered Lidocaine in Emergency Patients With Facial Swelling. [NCT01981772]88 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Transdermal Lidocaine for Pain Control During Diagnostic Office Hysteroscopy: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04518202]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Not yet recruiting
Clinical Outcomes of Transdermal Lidocaine Administration Prior to Levonorgestrel Releasing Intrauterine System Insertion in Women Delivered Only by Elective Cesarean Section: a Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial [NCT04517890]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Recruiting
The Effect of Different Modalities of General Anesthesia and Regional Cerebral Oxygenation on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery in Prone Position [NCT05148637]105 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-01Completed
The Impact of Retropubic Lidocaine vs Saline on Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Midurethral Sling: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT03913845]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-25Recruiting
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Headache [NCT05365880]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-23Recruiting
In Children, Placing a Synera Patch for Intravenous Access Combined With Administration of a Propofol-Lidocaine Mixture Decreases Pain Associated With Propofol Intravenous Injection. [NCT02240628]Phase 476 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
[NCT01773044]Phase 4300 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Cervical Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream Versus Glyceryl Trinitrate Cream on Pain Perception During Levonorgestrel- Intrauterine Device Insertion Among Nulliparous Women: a Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial [NCT04355598]Phase 4195 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-30Not yet recruiting
Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Vaginal Dinoprostone Versus Lidocaine-prilocaine Cream in Copper IUD Insertion in Nulliparous Women: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04340778]Phase 3210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-30Not yet recruiting
Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Primary Maxillary Second Molars Anesthesia Using Nasal Spray in Children [NCT03140787]68 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-15Completed
Pilot Study: A Randomized Trial Of Anesthetic Agents For Intravitreal Injection [NCT00769392]28 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Post Operative Analgesia Using the Transverse Abdominal Plan (TAP) Block in Patients Undergoing a Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy (RRP) [NCT00913068]110 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Selective Trunk Block Versus Hybrid Interscalene-Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Anaesthesia of the Entire Upper Extremity: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial [NCT04908371]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Published data indicated Selective Trunk Block is a better choice)
Assessing the Effect of Paracervical Block Volume on Pain Control for Dilation and Curettage: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03636451]Phase 3114 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-29Completed
A Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of pH on Pain Upon Local Anesthetic Administration. [NCT01304082]29 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient Enrollment)
Double Blind, Randomized, Prospective Trial of Impact of Pain Scores on Intrauterine Lidocaine vs Normal Saline Infusion Before IUD Placement. [NCT01311102]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Comparison of Two Lidocaine Administration Techniques [NCT01330134]Phase 4481 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Determination of the Duration of Action of a Lidocaine and a Bupivacaine Digital Nerve Block in Human Volunteers [NCT01508832]Phase 412 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Brain Imaging of Lidoderm for Chronic Back Pain [NCT01515540]Phase 438 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Spinal Morphine in Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy [NCT02924974]Phase 4160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial for Conservative Management of Cutaneous Abscess Using Topical Anesthetic in Children as Compared to Standard Management [NCT05461053]Phase 4300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2025-01-31Suspended(stopped due to PI will reassess recruitment strategies and feasibility.)
Effect of Local Anesthesia on Postoperative Pain Following Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation [NCT02890199]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-31Recruiting
A Randomized-controlled, Double-blind, Single-center Trial Comparing Impact of PENG Block on Quality of Recovery Compared to No-block for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty [NCT04591353]Phase 3122 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-01Completed
Intraoperative Lidocaine Versus Esmolol Infusion for Optimizing Surgical Field Visibility During Lumbar Discectomy [NCT04260685]Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-04Completed
An Open Label, Three-period, Single-application, Adhesion Performance Study ZTlido® (Lidocaine Topical System) 1.8% Compared to Lidoderm® (Lidocaine Patch 5%) and Versatis® (Lidocaine Medicated Plaster 5%) in Healthy, Adult, Human Subjects [NCT04320173]Phase 147 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-14Completed
Lidocaine Analgesia For Removal Of Wound Vacuum Assisted Closure Dressings: A Randomized Double Blinded Controlled Trial [NCT01126359]11 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Comparison the Effect of Lidocaine (With Epinephrine) With and Without Sufentanil on the Rate of Anesthesia of Intra-ligamentary Injection in Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis [NCT01572116]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Transdermal Lidocaine for Pain Control During Hysterosalpingography: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04518189]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Recruiting
Regenecare® in the Treatment of Skin Rash Associated With Cetuximab (Erbitux®) or Other EGFR Treated Cancer Patients [NCT00498992]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-07-31Recruiting
Post-Caesarean Section Incisional Infiltration With Lidocaine Versus Lidocaine and Epinephrine;Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT02274974]Phase 4160 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
A Single-blinded Randomized-controlled Study to Reduce Persistent Post-mastectomy Pain Using Multimodal Opioid-free Anesthesia [NCT05146778]Phase 3230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-16Recruiting
Effects of Nigella Sativa Oil on Pain Intensity and Physical Functions in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05541185]75 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-15Completed
Comparative Study of Articaine 4% Versus Lidocaine 2% in Local Anesthesia and Permanent Maxillary First Molars Affected by MIH. [NCT05585112]Phase 1/Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-10-17Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial of Trigger Point Injection Therapy for the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome [NCT01520415]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Ultrasound-guided Glenohumeral Versus Subacromial Steroid Injections for Impingement Syndrome With Mild Stiffness: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT06051370]51 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-12Completed
Randomized Double Blind Prospective Investigation of the Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Postoperative Pain Treatment and Bowel Function in Robotic Bowel Surgery [NCT03044808]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-02Completed
A Prospective Randomized Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Levobupivacaine on Block Dynamics After a Subparaneural Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block [NCT04397484]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-20Recruiting
Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial Of Greater Occipital Nerve Block For The Treatment Of Migraine Status [NCT00329732]2 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated due to inadequate recruitment)
Prospective, Randomized Study for Comparison of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Opposite - Infiltration of the Periost and Vertebral Body With Lidocaine - as Pain Palliative Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine [NCT01537770]Phase 452 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Intrauterine Lidocaine for Pain Control During Laminaria Insertion Prior to Dilation & Evacuation (D&E) [NCT01541293]Phase 172 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
Heated Lidocaine Patch Compared to Subacromial Injections in the Treatment of Pain Associated With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, A Pilot [NCT01544283]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-03-31Recruiting
A Comparison of the Recovery Profiles of Bupivacaine or Bupivacaine Mixed With Lidocaine Spinal Anesthesia and Local Infiltration Anesthesia for Outpatient Herniorrhaphy [NCT01548794]Phase 493 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Local Anesthetics Used During Intravenous Catheter Insertion [NCT02162680]Phase 499 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Study Evaluating the Efficacy of S-Caine™ Peel (Lidocaine 7% and Tetracaine 7% Cream) to Provide Local Dermal Anesthesia for Pulsed Dye Laser Therapy in Adults [NCT00110773]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Influence of Surgical Pleth Index-guided Analgesia Using Different Techniques on the Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Vitreoretinal Surgery Under General Anaesthesia: Randomised, Controlled Trial [NCT02973581]176 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Completed
Preemptive Analgesia for Post Abdominal Hysterectomy Pain Management [NCT00121498]32 participants Interventional2002-11-30Completed
A Phase III Clinical Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine and Tetracaine Cream (CU-30101) in a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Paired Design for Facial Laser Aesthetics in Chinese Adults [NCT05793892]Phase 3286 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-31Not yet recruiting
Analgesic Effects of Trigger Point Injection Added to Caudal Epidural Steroid [NCT05792111]Phase 472 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-12Recruiting
Subcutaneous Injection of Large Volumes of Tumescent Lidocaine and Epinephrine (TLE) by Laypersons: a Double-blind, Non-inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04733781]Phase 2/Phase 336 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-22Not yet recruiting
Predicting Individual Response to Analgesic Treatment in Painful Diabetic Neuropathy [NCT02363803]34 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Completed
Analgesic Efficacy of a Combination of Fentanyl and Lidocaine for Maxillary Infiltration in Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis [NCT01794533]Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Omeza Combination Therapy for the Management and Treatment of Chronic Cutaneous Wounds/Ulcers of Multiple Etiologies [NCT05921292]Phase 1100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-11Recruiting
Predictive Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Local Tetracycline Injection for Treatment of Post-mastectomy Seroma. [NCT04730674]18 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-01Completed
Paracervical Block for Pain Associated With Laminaria Insertion [NCT02454296]41 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Loss of Resistance With Nerve Stimulation Versus Loss of Resistance Alone; Effect on Success of Thoracic Epidural Placement. [NCT03087604]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-17Completed
An Open, Non-comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Treatment of Acne Scars With Restylane Vital Lidocaine [NCT01807455]Phase 412 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Optimal Lidocaine Buffering to Reduce Injection Pain in Local Anesthesia [NCT02647892]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-08Terminated(stopped due to IRB protocol administratively closed, Continuing Review or Study Completion Report not submitted)
The Effect of Introperative Ketamine and Lidocaine Infusion on Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Posterior Spinal Fusion Surgery - Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study [NCT04711668]75 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-29Completed
Propofol-dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol-remifentanil Conscious Sedation for Awake Craniotomy During Epilepsy Surgery [NCT02988050]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
Topical Nitroglycerine Treatment for Radial Artery Spasm Prevention [NCT02832115]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
Vulvar Vestibulitis Trial: Desipramine-Lidocaine [NCT00276068]128 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-08-31Completed
Perioperative Multimodal Analgesia Including Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion for Pain Management Following Idiopathic Scoliosis Correction Surgery in Children [NCT04069169]Phase 348 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-18Recruiting
Treatment of Temporomandibular Dysfunction With Hypertonic Dextrose Injection: A Randomised Clinical Trial of Efficacy [NCT01617356]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Frequency of Piriformis Syndrome in Hip and/or Leg Pain: Does the Presence of One Pathology Rule Out the Other? [NCT05450913]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-10Not yet recruiting
UCSF Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block Study- a Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial to Compare Nasal Anesthetics for Migraine Prevention in Adults. [NCT03666663]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-01Completed
Open-Label, Randomized, Split-Face Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Subject Satisfaction of Pain Management During and After Restylane® Dermal Filler Injections for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds [NCT00716443]Phase 451 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor decision)
[NCT00209872]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-10-31Not yet recruiting
Evoked (Magnetic) Cortical Fields for the Comparative Study of Mechanisms Underlying Chronic Non-malignant Pain in Peripheral Nerve Injury (CRPS II) and CRPS I (Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome I) [NCT00217243]60 participants (Actual)Observational2005-06-30Completed
Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Postoperative Pain Management After Laparoscopy Cholecystectomy [NCT02997215]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-01-31Recruiting
Comparison of Three Different Strategies to Prevent Propofol Induced Pain During Infusion [NCT00146926]Phase 3200 participants Interventional2005-09-30Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Lidocaine and Xylometazoline Intranasal Spray in Anesthetizing Maxillary Teeth: An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04732104]Early Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-20Completed
Early Ultrasound-guided Nerve Block for Painful Hand Injuries in the Emergency Department [NCT03195413]15 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-01Completed
Benefit of Lidocaine Perfusion in Cancer Related Visceral Pain Resistant to Morphinics: Efficacy Study in Adults and Children. Randomized Prospective Study With Direct Individual Benefit [NCT00181012]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-05-31Recruiting
FUndal Block During NovaSure enDometrial AbLation to Reduce Intraoperative PAIN: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04249063]288 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-18Active, not recruiting
Axillary Block in Association With Analgesic Truncal Blocks of the Median and Radial Nerves at the Elbow for Wrist Surgery. [NCT04046744]150 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-07Completed
Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Split-face Study Comparing Efficacy of Lidocaine 2.5%/Prilocaine 2.5% Cream Under Occlusion, and Lidocaine 23% /Tetracaine 7% Ointment for Anesthesia Prior to 1927nm Fractional Laser Treatment [NCT04523961]Phase 2/Phase 332 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-08Recruiting
The Effect of Local Anesthetic Injection Depth on Procedural Pain and Discomfort During Fluoroscopically Guided Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injections [NCT03308136]68 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-16Completed
The Efficacy of the Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics (EMLA) Cream Versus the Synera Patch for Pain Reduction During Venipuncture in Children [NCT00530803]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
A Randomized Comparison Between Single- and Double-injection Ultrasound-Guided Costoclavicular Block [NCT03595514]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-30Recruiting
Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Stress Response in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery During Perioperative Anesthesia and Its Correlation With Serum Orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) [NCT05899127]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-22Recruiting
Phase 1, Randomized Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study of Lidocaine Patch 1.8% (ZTlido™) and Lidocaine Patch 5% (Lidoderm®) in Healthy Subjects [NCT04149938]Phase 154 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-28Completed
Using Saline for Myofascial Pain Syndromes (USAMPS) [NCT02120261]Phase 451 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Terminated(stopped due to lack of activity, Primary researcher moved to another institution)
Effect of Intraarticular Steroids on Bone Turnover in Osteoarthritis [NCT00682357]25 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Reduction of Pain in the Wounds Treatment Previously Applying Lidocaine Topical Solution vs Placebo, in the Outpatients Area. [NCT03676556]Phase 346 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-16Recruiting
Efficacy of Opioid-free Anesthesia in Reducing Postoperative Respiratory Depression in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy: a Pilot Study [NCT02987985]Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-15Completed
Verification of Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block Success Using Transcranial Doppler in Management of Patients With Post Dural Puncture Headache [NCT04401878]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-24Completed
Lidocaine Reduces Muscle Tremor Caused by Electric Energy Devices, Which is Beneficial for Intraoperative Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Monitoring During Endoscopic Thyroid Lateral Neck Dissection [NCT03530033]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-01Recruiting
Nexplanon Removal: Subcutaneous vs. Topical Lidocaine [NCT04467125]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-06Recruiting
The Use of Amiodarone vs. Lidocaine and Placebo for the Prevention of Ventricular Fibrillation After Myocardial Reperfusion During Cardiopulmonary Bypass [NCT00587483]342 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Intraoperative Lidocaine Infusion vs. Esmolol Infusion for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02327923]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
The Effect of Topical Administration of Nitroglycerin and Lidocaine Versus Lidocaine Alone of the Radial Artery Diameter [NCT00686231]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Randomized Trial to Determine if Local Anesthesia Decreases Pain Perception in Women Undergoing Chorionic Villus Sampling [NCT03140293]Early Phase 1120 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Allodynia (Carl Koller Grant) [NCT00659633]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
The Evaluation of Ultrasonography-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Perioperative Analgesia and Intraabdominal Tissue Oxygenation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgery [NCT03808129]49 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-18Completed
Effects of Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia With Different Local Anesthetics on Propofol Induction [NCT02000973]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
Paracervical Versus Intracervical Lidocaine for Suction Curettage: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00816751]89 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
A Prospective Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Juvederm Volift With Lidocaine for Treatment of the Aging Hands [NCT04390581]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-20Completed
Autologous Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Steroid in Ultrasound-Guided Sacroiliac Joint Injection for Joint Dysfunction (Randomized Comparative Study) [NCT04757740]Phase 494 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-01Recruiting
Effect of Nebulized Lidocaine on the Quality of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion: A Randomized, Double Blind, Controlled Study [NCT03361397]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-30Not yet recruiting
Autofluorescent Flavoprotein Imaging of Intraepidermal Nerve Fibers: a Pilot Study [NCT02537951]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
[NCT00850889]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Effect of Lidocaine and Adrenaline Soaked Gauze Versus Normal Saline Soaked at Skin Graft Donor Site of Thigh: A Randomized Control Trial [NCT04344483]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-10Completed
Decision Support for Intraoperative Low Blood Pressure [NCT02726620]22,435 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-05Completed
Analgesic Effect of Perioperative Systemic Lidocaine in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Mastectomy Surgery [NCT00913003]Phase 422 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Terminated(stopped due to PI terminated employment with the University)
A Trial of Intravesical Therapy for Interstitial Cystitis in Patients With Generalized Vulvodynia [NCT01048177]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to This trial was never started)
Assessing Immunological Basis of Durable Antibody Responses to 9-valent HPV Vaccination [NCT05031078]Phase 432 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-21Recruiting
Comparison of Kinesio Taping, Dry Needling and Lidocain Injection Methods in Myofascial Pain Syndrome [NCT06018675]66 participants (Actual)Observational2017-01-01Completed
A Comparison of Tumescence in Breast Reduction Surgery [NCT01602692]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Dose-Ranging, Double Blind Study to Demonstrate the Safety and Efficacy of a CITI-002 Cream in the Seven Day Twice-Daily Treatment of Grade II or III Hemorrhoids [NCT05348200]Phase 2304 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-04-22Completed
Use Of The Needle Free Jet-Injection System With Buffered Lidocaine (J-Tip) For The Treatment Of Pain During Venipuncture For Blood Draws In Young Children [NCT01890642]205 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Continuous Lidocaine Infusion for Management of Perioperative Burn Pain [NCT02059902]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
The Effect of Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia With Different Block Level on Propofol Concentration During General Anesthesia Induction [NCT02135016]Phase 445 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Local Anesthesia for Ultrasound Guided Hip Joint Injections: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial of Bacteriostatic Saline Versus Buffered Lidocaine [NCT02209272]Phase 468 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
An Exploratory Study in Healthy Volunteers to Investigate the Cross-talk Between Local Drug Concentrations in the Skin and Systemic Concentrations During Topical Bioequivalence Studies Using Dermal Sampling Techniques [NCT03813030]26 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-16Completed
Do Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections With Low-dose Lidocaine Cause Transient Objective Upper Extremity Weakness? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03127137]Phase 4123 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-01Completed
Use of Preemptive Pudendal Nerve Block Prior to Hydrodistension for the Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Painful Bladder Syndrome (IC/PBS): a Prospective, Double-blinded, Randomized Control Trial [NCT02517996]18 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Preliminary results were promising when interim analysis performed but terminated due to primary investigators left recruitment site.)
A Phase II Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intravesical Alkalinized Lidocaine-Heparin for the Symptoms of Pelvic Pain and/or Urgency of Bladder Origin [NCT00256542]Phase 290 participants Interventional2006-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of the Lidocaine Patch 5% With Placebo in Patients With Pain From Carpal Tunnel Syndrome [NCT00266214]Phase 3210 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor decision)
Comparison of Large Antecubital Vein Versus Small Vein on Dorsum of Hand for the Prevention of Propofol Injection Pain [NCT04673500]160 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Thoracic Epidural Versus General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04721054]82 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-01Completed
Evaluation of Lidocaine Continuous Intravenous Administration for Postoperative Recovery After Colorectal Surgery [NCT00236249]Phase 3110 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Evaluation of Topical Anesthesia Alone Versus Combined With Intracameral Lidocaine 1% in Patients Undergoing Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) Procedure [NCT02215057]45 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Comparison of 2 Application Techniques for LET (Lidocaine 4%; Epinephrine 0.1%; Tetracaine 0.5%) Gel Used Prior to Simple Laceration Repair [NCT04536493]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-19Completed
A Randomised Feasibility Study Evaluating the Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine on Colorectal Cancer Outcome After Surgery [NCT05250791]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-02Recruiting
Lidocaine In The Treatment of Post-operative Pain Management From a Donor Site After Split Thickness Skin Graft Harvesting Following Thermal Injury [NCT02229578]32 participants (Actual)Observational2014-09-30Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of the Depth and Duration of Anesthesia From Heated Lidocaine/Tetracaine (Synera®) Patches Compared With 5% Lidocaine (Lidoderm®) Patches Applied to Healthy Adult Volunteers [NCT01688518]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
[NCT00653861]72 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Comparison of Corticosteroid and Ethanol Injection Therapy in the Treatment of Morton's Neuroma [NCT00284583]120 participants Interventional2005-05-31Recruiting
Lidocaine Pharmacokinetics During Tumescent Infiltrative Anaesthesia for Mastectomy. [NCT01687348]Phase 330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Comparison of Intravenous Lidocaine and Intraperitoneal Lidocaine Irrigation for Effective Pain Relief After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study [NCT01608373]Phase 483 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-07-31Recruiting
Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on the Incidence of Post-extubation Laryngospasm: A Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT01445847]134 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Patient Safety Concerns)
An Open-Label Pharmacokinetic Study of the Synera Patch Applied for 2-, 4-, and 12-hours and a Lidocaine/Tetracaine Patch Without Heat Applied for 4 Hours in Healthy Adult Volunteers [NCT01602757]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
An Evaluation of Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen for Pain Control in First Trimester Surgical Abortion [NCT01330459]Phase 4121 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Tumescent Lidocaine Effects on Platelet Function Following Liposuction Surgical Trauma: a Prospective Controlled Dosage-response Phase I Clinical Trial [NCT01463280]Phase 1129 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Therapeutic Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion Compared With Epidural Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Control in Adult Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial [NCT04017013]Phase 4210 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-03-01Completed
[NCT00308841]Phase 10 participants InterventionalCompleted
Effectiveness and Safety of STYLAGE® L Lidocaïne in the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds [NCT04844216]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-16Completed
The Use of Lignocaine and Bupivacaine Mix in Adult Safe Male Circumcision; Less is More [NCT02245126]217 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Comparison Between Local Anesthetics and Topical Cortikosteroids That is Applied to the Area of Cuff of Tracheal Intubation Tube in Pediatric Patients [NCT04085744]91 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-01Completed
Double Blinded Randomized Trial Between Lidocaine Jelly And Plain Aqueous Gel For Urethral Straight Catheterization And The Q-Tip Test [NCT00883103]Phase 4137 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Buffered vs Unbuffered Local Anesthesia Using Lidocaine, Carbocaine, and Articaine in Mandibular Molars Diagnosed With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis [NCT06047366]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-05Recruiting
A Multicenter, Evaluator-blinded, Randomized, No-treatment Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® With Lidocaine for Correction of Temple Hollowing in Chinese Population [NCT04891419]Phase 3168 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-07-20Completed
[NCT01496105]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-07-31Recruiting
Effectiveness of Parent-Led Interventions in Reducing Infant Hypersensitivity to Pain: A Longitudinal Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01503060]Phase 3352 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-12-31Recruiting
A Comparison of Lidocaine, Esmolol, and Placebo Without Use of a Tourniquet for Relieving Pain From Intravenous Administration of Propofol [NCT04356352]Phase 2/Phase 327 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-09Terminated(stopped due to feasibility of enrollment)
Effect of Epidural Analgesia on the Parameter ANI During Childbirth [NCT01505283]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Terminated(stopped due to recruitment difficulties)
Lidocaine Spray Compared With Submucosal Injection in Reducing Pain During Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01505920]Phase 3101 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
The Effects of Different Clonidine Concentrations on Axillary Brachial Plexus Block With 1,5% Lidocaine for Upper Limb Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Study [NCT01620112]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
The Effect of Liposomal Lidocaine on Perceived Pain in Children During Percutaneous Interosseous Pin Removal in the Outpatient Setting: A Triple Blinded, Randomized Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial [NCT01542125]Phase 4281 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Influence of Anesthetic Volume on Comfort Score During US-SCB Placement in Elderly Patients [NCT01624103]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-11-30Recruiting
Post Hysterectomy Pain Prevention: Randomized Clinical Trial of High Volume Preoperative Wound Infiltration and Pain Specific Anesthetic Protocol Versus Standard of Care (no Wound Infiltration and Routine Anesthetic Protocol) [NCT01627353]Phase 416 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Funding withdrawn)
Botulinum Toxin Versus Steroid Injection for Basal Joint Arthritis of the Thumb: a Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial [NCT01045694]Phase 48 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Unable to acquire additional funding needed to continue this study.)
Usefulness of Applying Lidocaine as Topical Pharyngeal Anaesthesia in Esophagogastroduodenoscopies Performed Under Sedation With Propofol- a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01489891]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Effects of Continuous Lidocaine Infusion Via Closed Chest Drainage Tube on Postoperative Analgesia for Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Partial Lung Resection: a Single-center Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT05901389]456 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-30Not yet recruiting
Vice-presidency for Research [NCT01659359]Phase 2/Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
The Role of Intravenous (IV) Lidocaine in the Management of Chronic Neuropathic Pain of Peripheral Nerve Origin [NCT01669967]34 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
A Phase IIb, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study, With Open-label Follow on, to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of PSD502 in Subjects With Premature Ejaculation (PE) [NCT00556478]Phase 2/Phase 3256 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Subject- and Evaluating Investigator-blinded, Controlled, Multicenter, Split-face, Comparison Clinical Investigation to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Princess FILLER Lidocaine in the Correction of Nasolabial Folds [NCT03990883]295 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-04Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial of 2% Lidocaine Gel for IUD Insertion [NCT01292447]150 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Bayesian Non-inferiority Trial of Injection Therapies for Acromioclavicular Joint Pain: a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT05161468]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-01Recruiting
Greater Occipital and Supraorbital Nerve Blockade For The Preventive Treatment of Migraine [NCT03435185]103 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-01Completed
Efficacy of a Cold, Vibration, and Distraction Based Medical Device on the Prevention of Health Care Induced Pediatric Pain: a Comparative, Controlled, Randomized and Multicentric Study [NCT03220555]220 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-04Completed
Effect of Perioperative Systemic Lignocaine on Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Elective Open Abdominal Surgeries- a Double Blinded Randomized Control Trial [NCT01699919]Phase 4134 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Treatment of Temporomandibular Dysfunction With Hypertonic Dextrose Injection: A Randomised Clinical Trial of Efficacy [NCT01706172]Phase 2/Phase 342 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
[NCT01708330]Phase 370 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
Efficacy of Endotracheal Tube Cuffs Pre-filled With Alkalinized Lidocaine Compared to Endotracheal Tube Cuffs Filled With Saline on the Incidence of Coughing During Emergence of Anesthesia. [NCT01715688]200 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Comparison of Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Lidocaine Spray for Pain Relief in Office Hysteroscopy: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial [NCT01718314]138 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Randomized and Blinded Comparison of Superficial and Deep Injection Methods [NCT01402011]77 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
A Randomized Single-blinded Trial of Combined Spinal-Epidural Versus Continuous Epidural Analgesia [NCT01750099]202 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Comparison Between Bupivacaine 0.5% Versus Bupivacaine 0.25% Plus Lidocaine 1% in Ultrasound-guided Infraclavicular Block: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05834023]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-02Recruiting
The Effect of Applying Xylocaine Gel 2% to the Eye Preoperatively in Pediatrics Undergoing Squint Surgeries on Oculocardiac Reflex Intraoperatively and Postoperative Pain and Agitation: Cohort Study [NCT04859062]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-01Completed
Bupivacaine Versus Lidocaine Local Anesthesia in Elective Outpatient Hand Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01751347]Phase 4135 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine 5% Medicated Plaster in Localized Chronic Post-operative Neuropathic Pain [NCT01752322]Phase 3444 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
Sciatic Nerve Block for Ankle/Foot Surgeries. A Comparison Between a Premixed Solution of Lidocaine Plus Bupivacaine and Consecutive Infiltration of Lidocaine and Bupivacaine. A Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Prospective Study [NCT01756443]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
To Compare lidocaine2%/Clonidine in Combination With Bupivacaine 0.5 % Alone in Equal Volumes for Combined Sciatic-saphenous Nerve Block in Terms of Selectivity of Blockade [NCT01759524]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Comparison of in Intubation With Nerve Block and Intubation With Sedation in Awake Patients in Terms of Efficacy, Complications and Physician's Satisfaction [NCT01768377]Phase 370 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-11-30Recruiting
Clinical Trial On The Use Of Three Commercial Preparations Of Injectable Hyaluronic Acid (Emervel® Volume Lidocaine, Emervel® Deep Lidocaine And Emervel® Touch) In Hands Rejuvenation [NCT01774396]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Efficacy of Pilsicainide After Radiofrequency Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Compared With Other Class IC Anti-arrhythmic Drugs [NCT01775891]245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-07-31Recruiting
Local Anesthetic Response in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) and Healthy Volunteers [NCT05603741]Phase 4155 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-10Active, not recruiting
Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Superiority Trial, Evaluating the Effect of Perioperative Lidocaine on Postoperative Opioid Consumption, Pain Ratings, Duration of Hospital Stay, Time to First Defecation, 30-day Mortality and Development of Chronic [NCT03677817]Phase 3113 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-03Completed
Intrathecal Magnesium Associated to Lidocaine Decreases the Incidence of the Transitory Neurologic Syndrome Following Same-day-surgery [NCT01794247]Phase 321 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Terminated(stopped due to low recruitment rate)
Autologous Fat Grafting for Pedal Fat Pad Atrophy [NCT01796808]31 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
A Randomised Double Blind Controlled Trial of Injection of Local Anaesthetic and Corticosteroid Under Ultrasound Control in the Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome. [NCT01807962]Phase 346 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Slower than planned recruitement)
Long-term Outcomes of Lidocaine Infusions for Post-Operative Pain (LOLIPOP) Trial [NCT05072314]Phase 44,300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-27Recruiting
Clinical Predictors and Epigenetic Markers for Liver Fibrosis in Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency [NCT01810458]109 participants (Actual)Observational2013-10-31Completed
Effect of Combined Intra-articular Injection of Lidocaine Plus Physiotherapy in Treatment of Frozen Shoulder [NCT01817348]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
The Effect of Esmolol on Pain Due to Rocuronium Injection Pain [NCT01824758]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Effect of Ketamine Addition to Lidocaine for Postoperative Pain Management in Rhinoplasty [NCT01827020]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Study of the Reinnervation of Facial Muscles After Lengthening Temporalis Myoplasty [NCT01833221]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Terminated(stopped due to The study reach enough significance at the intermediary analysis)
NK Activity Modulation by Intravenous Lidocaine During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery [NCT01841294]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-01-31Recruiting
Simplifying the Shang Ring Technique for Circumcision of Men and Boys [NCT02390310]574 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine on Serum BDNF, NGF, miRNA-206 and miRNA-98 in Elderly Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery Under General Anesthesia [NCT05502705]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-01Not yet recruiting
Does Ilioinguinal Block Provide Satisfactory Analgesia During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Procedure? A Comparative Study [NCT05220813]Phase 488 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-11Recruiting
Comparison of Three Methods of Hemoglobin Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Spine or Hip Surgery [NCT01284296]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
A Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial of Efficacy and Safety of Perineural Local Anesthetics and Steroids for Chronic Peripheral Post-traumatic Neuropathic Pain: The Resperist Study [NCT03009500]Phase 33 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Completed
The Role of 5% Lidocaine Patches in the Pain Control of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Receiving Radiofrequency Ablation: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study [NCT05732181]154 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-09Completed
Onset and Duration of Effect of Lidocaine, Bupivacaine, and Lidocaine/Bupivacaine Mixture With Epinephrine. [NCT01243112]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Comparison of Buffered vs. Non-Buffered Lidocaine Used in Dental and Oral Surgical Procedures: Clinical Outcomes [NCT02620683]23 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
A Phase 1, Double-blind, 4-way Crossover Study of the Tolerability, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of 4 Formulations of Ketorolac Tromethamine by Intranasal Administration in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01355588]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Comparison of 0.5% Tetracaine Drops Versus 2% Lidocaine Gel for Anesthetic Efficacy and Comfort in Patients Undergoing LASIK [NCT01383200]Phase 411 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Terminated(stopped due to eyes that received gel had slightly thinner than intended flaps)
A Multi-center, Non-comparative Study to Evaluate the Perception of Facial Expressions Following Correction of Wrinkles and Folds in the Lower Face Using Emervel Classic Lidocaine and Emervel Deep Lidocaine [NCT02573337]Phase 463 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Pilot Study: Comparison of Buffered 1% vs. Non-Buffered 2% Lidocaine Used in Dental and Oral Surgical Procedures: Clinical Outcomes [NCT02708433]23 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Prospective Blinded Study Looking at PO/IV Analgesia Alone Versus PO/IV Analgesia With Superior Hypogastric Nerve Block for Uterine Artery Embolization Pain Management [NCT02270255]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
The Platelet Aggregation After tiCagrelor Inhibition and FentanYl Trial [NCT02683707]Phase 4212 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion Versus Oral Duloxetine For The Prevention And Treatment Of Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Among Breast Cancer Patients [NCT04732455]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-15Completed
Ultrasound Guided Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane Block in Breast Cancer Surgeries [NCT04336917]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-31Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate Effect of Postoperative Intraperitoneal Lidocaine on the Analgesic and Prognosis of Patients With Ovarian Cancer [NCT05450055]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-18Not yet recruiting
Efficacy of Buprenorphine on Postoperative Endodontic Analgesia [NCT03268278]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-01Terminated(stopped due to Loss of interest)
Effects of Lidocaine Patch on Intradermal Capsaicin Induced Pain and Hyperalgesia [NCT00373893]Phase 112 participants Interventional2005-12-31Completed
Paracervical Block Versus No Paracervical Block During IUD Insertion [NCT02904915]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-12Completed
Transcricoid Injection vs. Spray as You go Method for Local Anaesthesia During Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA): A Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT02981264]365 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-01Completed
A Prospective, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Tymbion Iontophoresis and Tympanostomy Tube Placement Using the Tula Iontophoresis and Tube Delivery Systems for Adults in an Office Setting [NCT03119181]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-27Completed
Basivertebral Nerve Block Performed in Conjunction With Vertebral Augmentation for Anesthesia [NCT04774029]Early Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-10Completed
Study on the Effects of Paraspinal Lidocaine Injection on Nonspecific Low Back Pain [NCT02387567]Phase 3378 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Postoperative Subtenons Anesthesia for Postoperative Pain in Pediatric Strabismus Surgery [NCT01812044]57 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Patient Satisfaction in Mohs Micrographic Surgery With Supplemental Lidocaine Jelly [NCT03595449]Phase 4233 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-13Completed
A Comparison of Pain Perception Using Topical EMLA Cream Versus Lidocaine Injection for Vulvar Biopsy: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03654417]Phase 437 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-17Terminated(stopped due to interim analysis produced significant results, so we ended enrollment)
Comparison of 2 Application Techniques for LET (Lidocaine 4%; Epinephrine 0.1%; Tetracaine 0.5%) Gel Used Prior to Simple Laceration Repair in Children [NCT04203225]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-22Completed
Prevalence of Lidocaine Ineffectiveness in Those With Hard-to-treat ADHD [NCT04167189]Early Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-20Completed
Vapocoolant Spray as a Novel Local Anesthetic for Cutaneous Abscess Incision and Drainage [NCT01673061]Phase 421 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Vapocoolant not effective controlling pain compared with Lidocaine.)
Aerosolized Endotracheal Lidocaine to Avoid Intracranial Pressure Spikes in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury [NCT05058677]Phase 412 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-09Recruiting
Effects of Adding Intravenous Lidocaine, Alfentanil Before Bronchoscopic Insertion for Preventing Cough During Bronchoscopic Spraying of Local Anesthetics in Non-intubated Bronchoscoopic Interventions [NCT05072236]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-09Recruiting
Testing the Efficacy of a Vibrating, Cold Device for Pediatric IV Cannulation Pain Relief in the Emergency Department [NCT01394250]Phase 2240 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
[NCT00382083]Phase 40 participants Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Lidocaine as an Anesthetic Adjuvant in Upper Abdominal Laparoscopic Surgery [NCT04584749]Phase 496 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-16Recruiting
Intravenous Lidocaine Reduces Remifentanil and Propofol Requirements Without Altering the Electrical Stapedial Reflex Threshold in Pediatric Cochlear Implants [NCT04194294]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-18Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Conventional, Bar-shaped, and V-shaped Local Infiltration Anesthesia on Pain Relief and Cannulation Success Rate in Patients Requiring Radial Artery Cannulation. [NCT05735132]180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-05Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Efficacy of Two Topical Anesthetics: Benzocaine Versus Pliaglis for Control of Pain Associated With Dental Needle Insertion in the Palate, A Double Blind Study [NCT01951820]Phase 464 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
The Importance of the Superior Cluneal Nerve in Patients With Low Back Pain [NCT05303597]250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-01Not yet recruiting
Pre-emptive Epinephrine Nebulization Prior to Nasotracheal Intubation for Mandibular Fracture Fixation Surgeries:Dose it Really Differs? a Randomized Controlled Study [NCT05738564]Phase 3126 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-01Completed
Local Injection of Tranexamic Acid May Reduce Bleeding, Injection Pain, and Other Post-op Complications During Mohs Micrographic Surgery [NCT04630886]Early Phase 1200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-16Enrolling by invitation
Intraureteral of Alkalinized Lidocaine as Novel Approach to Post-Ureteroscopy Pain: Double-blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01450566]48 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-09-30Recruiting
Analgesic Efficacy of Intravenous Perfusion of Lidocaine, Ketamine or a Combination After Laparotomy in a Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Double-blind Prospective Study [NCT01439399]52 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
[NCT01443325]Phase 321 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Topical Lidocaine for Pain Control With IUD Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01445756]Early Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
Effect of Silver Diamine Fluoride on Local Anesthesia Efficacy in Molar Incisor Hypomineralization-affected Molars in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT05964387]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-12Recruiting
Ondansetron as a Strategy for Reducing Propofol Injection Pain in Pediatrics: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05378113]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-18Recruiting
Effect of Atelocollagen Injection in Patients With Calcific Tendinitis [NCT06040112]Phase 446 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-30Not yet recruiting
Comparison of the Efficacy of Two Techniques for Sacroiliac Joint Injection: Ultrasound Guidance Versus Fluoroscopic Guidance [NCT02420041]28 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
Efficacy of Treatments for Provoked Vestivulodynia : a Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Multimodal Physiotherapy Treatments to Topical Lidocaine [NCT01455350]212 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Effects of Age on Minimum Effective Volume of Local Anesthetic for Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block (US-SCB) [NCT01467596]44 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
The Effect of a Regimen of Opioid Sparing Anesthesia on Postoperative Recovery [NCT05717361]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-01Recruiting
Comparison of Two Methods Using Intranasal Lidocaine to Alleviate Discomfort Associated With Administration of Intranasal Midazolam in Children. [NCT03054844]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-03Completed
Perioperative Epidural Versus Intravenous Local Anesthetic Infusion in Open Upper Abdominal Surgery [NCT03005171]Phase 2/Phase 370 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Completed
Surgery Prevention by Transforaminal Injection of Epidural Steroids for Cervical Radicular Pain (SPIES): a Randomized, Controlled Trial [NCT02226159]Phase 465 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Active, not recruiting
Bowel Care and Cardiovascular Function After Spinal Cord Injury [NCT01567605]Phase 413 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Establishing Technique for PECS Type 2 (Serratus Block) Catheter Insertion With Ultrasound Guidence [NCT03030677]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-01Completed
TIVA With Ketofol Versus Lidoketofol for Short-term Anesthesia on Pediatric Patients; Effects on Recovery [NCT04467424]Phase 2200 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-20Completed
Evaluation of Pain With the Use of Lidocaine-Mixed Radiesse® Injectable Dermal Filler for the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds [NCT01012661]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
[NCT02039661]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
Magnesium Sulphate Versus Fentanyl: Effects on the Quality of Bier Block: Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT04393610]Phase 2/Phase 375 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-14Recruiting
Lidocaine Administration During Flexible Bronchoscopy and Endobronchial Ultrasound [NCT03829618]Phase 329 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-01Terminated(stopped due to COVID lack of cases/recruitment)
Lumbar Punctures in Neonates: Improving Success Rates and Minimizing Pain [NCT01606150]5 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Investigator left the insititution)
Articaine Success in Pulpectomy of Primary Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis in Children Under Four Years: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05944341]164 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-01Recruiting
Self-Administered Lidocaine Gel for Pain Management With IUD Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02738203]Phase 3220 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-01Completed
The Effect of a Mixture of Dexmedetomidine-lidocaine-ketamine in One Syringe Versus Opioids on Recovery Profile and Postoperative Pain After Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery [NCT04858711]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-01Recruiting
A Randomised, Multi-centre, Parallel-group, Efficacy and Safety Study Evaluating Two and Three Initial Treatment Sessions of Restylane Skinboosters Vital Lidocaine in the Face [NCT02403986]Phase 453 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
Effect of Intraoperative Intravenous Lidocaine on the Quality of Recovery Following Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection [NCT05750056]Phase 4234 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-24Not yet recruiting
Mechanical Diagnosis and Treatment and/or Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections Versus Usual Care for Chronic Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Pilot Study. [NCT02951377]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-01Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment)
Intracervical Two Percent Lidocaine Gel as an Analgesic During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01214161]200 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
Evaluation of Buffered Local Anesthesia in Dental Extraction: A Randomized Clinical Study. [NCT04773236]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-22Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Effect of Lidocaine on Hemodynamic Response and Postoperative Sore Throat [NCT06122324]100 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-10-30Enrolling by invitation
The Effect of Local Anesthesia When Used in Dental Restorative Cases Under General Anesthesia on Control of Intraoperative Physiologic Parameters and Post Operative Comfort [NCT04500158]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-03Recruiting
Comparison of the Efficiency of Intravenous Treatments Used in Bridge Treatment of Medication Overuse Headache [NCT05608642]45 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-22Active, not recruiting
Quality of Recovery of Opioid Free Anaesthesia Versus Opioids Anaesthesia Within Enhanced Recovery Protocol Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Saudi Arabia, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04285255]103 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-03-01Completed
Greater Occipital Nerve and Cervical Region Injection in Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia [NCT04505280]29 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-01Completed
Effect of Lidocaine and Esmolol Alone or in Combination to Improve the Quality of Recovery, Maintaining Hemodynamic Stability During Abdominal Surgery [NCT01114997]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Terminated(stopped due to The early report didn't show any benefit.)
Evaluation of Plasma Concentrations of Intravenous Lidocaine and Epidural Ropivacaine When Used in Combination in Major Abdominal Surgery [NCT05368753]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-09Recruiting
Pain Control for Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Trial of 1% Lidocaine Paracervical Block [NCT01207401]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
Is Painless ESWL Possible? Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block During Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy [NCT03080363]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-15Completed
Hip Denervation in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis [NCT04775225]Phase 3120 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-06Completed
Spinal Fentanyl or Epidural Analgesia in the Early First Phase of Induced Labor [NCT04645823]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-26Completed
A Randomized, Split Arm Study to Evaluate the Safety Following Injection of GP0045 Compared to Restylane Lyft Lidocaine [NCT03133325]12 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-19Completed
Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound-guided Steroid Injection Versus Wrist Splint in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome [NCT04515966]Phase 470 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-01Recruiting
Glossopharyngeal Nerve Blockade for Awake Videolaryngoscopy Assisted Endotracheal Intubation in the Morbidly Obese [NCT01790464]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
A Phase II, Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Treatment-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study of the Efficacy of Kovacaine Nasal Spray for Anesthetizing Maxillary Teeth in Healthy Dental Patients [NCT01302483]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Randomized Control Trial of Magnesium-Based Trigger Point Injections vs. Lidocaine-Only Trigger Point Injections for Relief of Chronic Myofascial Pelvic Pain [NCT02728037]Phase 338 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Low Enrollment, Adoption of investigational treatment into standard practice at our center.)
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Comparator-controlled, Evaluator-blinded Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of VP1 Lido US for Volume Augmentation of the Cheek [NCT04886232]202 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-25Completed
Comparison of the Effects of Ultrasonography-guided Suprascapular Nerve Block and Intra-articular Shoulder Injection on Pain, Functional Status and Range of Motion in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis; Randomized, Controlled Trial [NCT05909462]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-01-21Completed
Safety and Effects of PDRN(Polydeoxyribonucleotide) Injection in Patient With Elbow Epicondylitis in Randomized Double-blind Active-control Comparative Study [NCT02492945]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
Pudendal Block Versus Penian Block For Circumcision In Children: A Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT03046290]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Recruiting
Anesthetic Effect Duration Produced by Lidocaine 7% + Tetracaine 7% Cream on 2 Different Body Areas [NCT01545765]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
A Randomised, Subject-blinded Study of Treatment Preference During Cheek Contouring Comparing Restylane® SubQ With and Without the Addition of Lidocaine Hydrochloride 0.3% [NCT01431755]54 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
[NCT01579305]285 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
Does Perineural Dexamethasone Increase the Duration of an Ulnar Nerve Block When Controlling for Systemic Effects? A Randomised, Blinded, Placebo-controlled, Paired, Non-inferiority Trial in Healthy Volunteers. [NCT04817982]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-07Completed
Airway Nerve Block Versus Nebulization by Lignocaine During Diagnostic Flexible Bronchoscopy Under Moderate Sedation. A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04806438]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-21Not yet recruiting
Clinical Neuropharmacology of Pain in Spinal Cord Injury- Dextromethorphan/Lidocaine Combination (Factorial Design) Clinical Trial [NCT02218203]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
The Effectiveness of Buccal Infiltration Only Using Articaine for Routine Exodontia of Mandibular Molar: A Cross-Over Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT06161714]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Not yet recruiting
Painless Local Anaesthesia With Bicarbonate Admixture: A Phase II, Monocentric, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Crossover Trial [NCT03238625]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-01Completed
Corticosteriods vs. Saline vs. Air Placebo Intra-articular Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Single Blinded Prospective Randomized Trial [NCT02995083]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Study deemed not feasible)
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Promescent Lidocaine Spray in Men With Premature Ejaculation [NCT02241460]Phase 3120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-03-31Enrolling by invitation
Comparison of the Effects of Esketamine, Sufentanil, or Lidocaine Combined With Propofol on Tussis Reflection During Upper Gastroscopy: a Randomised, Two Centre, Three-blind, Controlled Trial [NCT05497492]400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-05Recruiting
Topical Lidocaine-prilocaine Cream Versus Lidocaine Infiltration for Pain Relief During Insertion of Subcutaneous Birth Control Implants : A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03187392]Phase 3144 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-06-12Active, not recruiting
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Nerve Block for Postdural Puncture Headache in Obstetrics [NCT03181464]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-17Withdrawn(stopped due to Unable to recruit participants)
Evaluation of Pain With the Use of Radiesse® With Lidocaine for the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds [NCT01069354]102 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Changes in the Plantar Fascia After a Single Injection of Platelet Rich Plasma Compared to Steroid [NCT05339542]98 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-10Completed
Upshots of 5% Emla Cream Versus 20% Benzocaine on Pre-Injection Analgesia. [NCT05060913]Early Phase 170 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-11-17Completed
The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Propofol Requirements in Patients Undergoing Hysteroscopy and Diagnostic Curettage [NCT04633577]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-20Completed
Opioid-Free Anesthesia in Cardiac Surgery [NCT04940689]Phase 3268 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-01Not yet recruiting
Xylocaine to Freeze During Unpleasant Nasopharyngeal Swabs: a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo Controlled-Trial [NCT04901065]Phase 2/Phase 388 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-11Completed
Topical Lidocaine Anesthesia for Nasopharyngeal Sampling: A Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT04885777]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-01Completed
Comparison of Intraoperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion and Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block for Post-operative Analgesia Following Laproscopic Cholecystectomy [NCT05231941]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-17Recruiting
Effect of Topical Lidocaine on Warm and Cold Sensation in Healthy Individuals - a Randomized Crossover Trial [NCT04865185]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-01Recruiting
Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine on Serum miRNA-135a and Its Downstream Proteins Rock2 and Add1 in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-cardiac Surgery Under General Anesthesia. [NCT05503043]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-01Not yet recruiting
The Effectiveness of Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Suprascapular Nerve and Shoulder Joint Compared to Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injection for Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain Management and Functional Improvement. [NCT05563571]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-01Recruiting
Intracervical Block and Pain Perception During the Performance of a Hysterosalpingogram: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00372658]Phase 2120 participants Interventional2002-07-31Completed
The Effect of Ultrasonic Nebulizer Delivered Lidocaine on Circulatory Responses During Tracheal Intubation and Postoperative Sore Throat [NCT01838993]70 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-01-31Recruiting
Comparision of Addition of Dexamethasone vs Bicarbonate to Intracuff Lignocaine 2% in Terms of Extubation Characteristics and Patient Satisfaction Undergoing General Anaesthesia [NCT03833947]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-15Completed
Ultrasound-guided Pulsed Radiofrequency Stimulation of the Tibial Nerve for Plantar Fasciitis [NCT02242513]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of 0.3% Lidocaine With EVOLENCE® [NCT00929071]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Prospective Evaluation of Topical Anesthesia in Children [NCT04378283]99 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
Optimal Method for Mydriasis in Cataract Surgery [NCT02909140]3 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Terminated(stopped due to insufficient patient recruitment)
Scalp Block: Hemodynamic Stability and Patient Comfort In Craniotomy Patients [NCT03177252]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Investigator decided not to go forward with the trial.)
Pilot Study: Comparison of Buffered 1% vs. Non-Buffered 1% Lidocaine Used in Dental and Oral Surgical Procedures: Clinical Outcomes Mandible [NCT03127943]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-01Completed
Effectiveness of Continuous Application of Lidocaine Cream, Povidone Iodine Cream, and Honey on Second-degree Perineal Tear Healing, a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT05946005]Phase 4200 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-01Completed
Comparing Low Dose and High Dose Steroid Injection for Adhesive Capsulitis [NCT04364425]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-04Recruiting
A Randomized Study of the Effects of Perioperative i.v. Ketorolac-lidocaine on the Hemodynamic Response in the Patients With Valvular Heart Diseases During Cesarean Delivery [NCT01571791]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-06-30Suspended(stopped due to No enough recruited cases)
In Children, Does the Use of Synera Patch for Local Analgesia Before Vascular Access Reduce Pain Associated With Propofol Injection for Anesthesia Induction? [NCT01576770]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-04-30Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active-controlled Study of the Electrophysiological Effects of ABT-639 on Spontaneous Activity in C-Nociceptors in Patients With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy [NCT01589432]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
[NCT01593930]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Is Lidocaine Useful Before Esophageal Manometry and Ambulatory pH Monitoring? A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT03967197]Phase 2/Phase 3304 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-06Completed
Needle-Free Injection of Lidocaine for Local Anesthesia Prior to Trigger Digit Injection [NCT02084706]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
A Randomised, Multi-center, Subject and Evaluator-blinded Study Comparing the Pain and the Safety Profile Associate With Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds Using Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Compared to Restylane Perlane [NCT03174132]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-21Completed
Trigger Finger Corticosteroid Injection With and Without Local Anesthetic; a Randomized, Double Blind Controlled Trial [NCT04023695]Phase 4110 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-01Completed
[NCT02703948]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Intravenous Lidocaine and Time to Regression of the Sensory Block After Spinal Anesthesia With Isobaric Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Surgery to Treat Skin and Soft Tissue Tumors of the Lower Limbs [NCT04741880]Phase 2/Phase 366 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-17Recruiting
Different Analgesics Prior to IUD Insertion: Is There Any Evidence? [NCT02522130]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-07-31Recruiting
Impact of Intravenous Lidocaine on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With ARDS During COVID-19 Pandemia [NCT04609865]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-04Recruiting
Penile Fracture: A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Erectile Function at 12 Months After Immediate Degloving Repair Versus Delayed Localized Repair [NCT03449940]46 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Epidural Steroid Injections for Spinal Stenosis in Persons 50 and Older [NCT01238536]Phase 4400 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Placebo Controlled Phase II Study of Parenteral Lidocaine's Ability To Acutely Relieve Opioid Refractory Pain [NCT00321347]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to No patients enrolled and clinician no longer at institution.)
Effectiveness and Tolerability of the On-demand Use of Combined Dapoxetine With Tadalafil and Combined Dapoxetine With Lidocaine 5% Spray in Treatment of Patients With Lifelong Premature Ejaculation and Non-responding to Dapoxetine Alone. [NCT04703127]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-30Recruiting
Lidocaine Infusion in Pancreatic Cancer: Translational Studies in a Preclinical Model And Human Subjects [NCT04048278]Early Phase 146 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-08Recruiting
Effect of Prolonging Intravenous Lidocaine on Chronic Pain and Long-term Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy [NCT05492669]Phase 2272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-27Recruiting
The Effect of Intravesical Lidocaine Solution Versus Placebo as Anesthesia Prior to Intravesical Injection of Onabotulinum Toxin A. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Cross-over Study [NCT05415865]Phase 350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-12Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Single-dose Study of the Efficacy of Lidocaine 8 mg + Cetylpyridinium Chloride (CPC) 2 mg Fixed Combination Lozenges on Sore Throat Pain Intensity Compared to Lozenges Containing Lidocaine 1 mg and CPC 2 mg in S [NCT01265446]Phase 3250 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Addition of Hyaluronidase to Lidocaine and Bupivacaine in Scalp Nerves Block in Elective Craniotomy Operations, Comparative Study [NCT03411330]Early Phase 164 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-24Completed
Femoral Nerve Blockade 7.5 ml of 1% Lidocaine: US Guidance Versus US Guidance With Electrical Stimulation of Peripheral Nerves [NCT05209711]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-01Recruiting
Preventing Propofol Injection Pain: Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Propofol Versus Fospropofol [NCT01401049]Phase 4116 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
The Effect of a Regimen of Opioid Sparing Anesthesia on Postoperative Recovery [NCT05594407]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-01Recruiting
Effect of Intravenous Infusion of Magnesium Sulfate Associated or Not to Lidocaine On the Neuromuscular Blockade Induced by Muscle Relaxant Cistracurium [NCT02483611]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
Self-Administered Lidocaine Gel for Pain Management With First Trimester Surgical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02447029]Phase 3142 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
A Multicenter Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy of the Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for the Treatment of the Postdural Puncture Headache After Labor Epidural [NCT03560349]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Both Study PI's left the institution)
Effect of Intravenous Single-bolus Lidocaine Infusion Versus Intravenous Single-bolus Magnesium Sulfate Infusion on Postoperative Pain, Emotional Status and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Spine Fusion Surgery [NCT04776369]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-05-01Active, not recruiting
Lidocaine Patches After Cesarean Section [NCT04443569]Phase 393 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-10Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Versus Paravertebral Regional Blockade in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colectomy [NCT02164929]17 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor recruitment)
Intrauterine Anesthesia in Operative, Awake, Office Hysteroscopy. A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT05610371]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-01Completed
Sciatic Nerve Blockade by Subgluteal Access 12.5 ml of 1% Lidocaine: US Guidance Versus US Guidance With Electrical Stimulation of Peripheral Nerves (Influence of the Sciatic Nerve Blockade on the Effectiveness of Small Doses of Local Anesthetic.). [NCT05205473]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-02-01Completed
The Effects of Injection Site Cooling and Solution Buffering on Perceived Pain During Local Anesthesia Administration [NCT04991597]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Shift in research focus)
Use of 2% Lidocaine Gel Versus Water Based Lubrication: Is There a Difference in Pain During and After Multi-channel Urodynamics? [NCT01612156]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
A Phase II Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Clinical Trial of Sphenopalatine Ganglion (SPG) Block for Headache After Concussion [NCT04650282]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-18Terminated(stopped due to Reassignment of PI to more intense clinical obligations prevents continuation of the trial.)
Pain With Trigger Finger Injection: A Comparison of Steroid Alone Versus Steroid/Lidocaine Mixture [NCT02421419]Phase 426 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Study closed; recruitment problems)
A Prospective Evaluation of the Addition of Intraoperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion to General Anesthetic in Total Abdominal Hysterectomy. [NCT00382499]93 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Nebulized Lidocaine and Intranasal Midazolam for Reducing Pain/Anxiety of Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04571879]Phase 348 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-25Recruiting
Comparison of Infiltration of 2% Lidocaine With and Without Needle as Analgesia in Epidural Needle Insertion [NCT05326867]84 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-11-01Completed
The Efficacy of Local Anesthetics to Reduce Shoulder Pain Post-Steroid Injections [NCT02592629]Phase 419 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-01Terminated(stopped due to Lack of time to enroll due to additional responsibilities of the PI and research coordinator.)
Intravenous Lidocaine Versus Provider Chosen Dose of Morphine for the Treatment of Severe Pain in the Emergency Department: An Open-label Randomized Controlled Pilot Study [NCT02912195]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Randomized Double Blind Comparison of Peri-Operative Standard Analgesia With Peri-Operative Lidocane, Ketamine, or Lidocane and Ketamine Combination, Infusion for Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery [NCT01983020]Phase 346 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
the Safety and Effectiveness of the Effects on the Perioperative Pain Control Comparing Between the Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block Using the Camera Guided and the Intrathoracic Intercostals Nerve Block for the Management of Nonintubated Local Regional [NCT03086213]48 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-01Completed
Efficacy of Superior Laryngeal Nerve Block for Chronic Cough [NCT04421092]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-22Completed
Opioid Sparing Anaesthesia Via Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine and Lidocaine Infusion for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery [NCT04706897]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-15Completed
Effect of Perioperative Continuous Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine on Postoperative Pain in Elderly Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05920980]276 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-05Enrolling by invitation
Adjunctive 5% Lidocaine Patches in the Treatment of Acute Non-radicular Low Back Pain in Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department [NCT03301766]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-10Withdrawn(stopped due to Delay for subject recruitment and then not feasible with COVID>)
MAST Trial: Multi-modal Analgesic Strategies in Trauma [NCT03472469]Phase 41,561 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-02Completed
Impact of Peripheral Afferent Input on Central Neuropathic Pain [NCT05646810]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-01Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Analgesia by Serratus Plane Block During Pleural Drainage in Intensive Care Unit. [NCT03984656]Phase 370 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-04Recruiting
A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo Controlled, Proof-of-concept Study in Subjects With Abdominal or Thoracic Chronic Scar Pain to Assess the Analgesic Properties of Intradermal Doses of Dysport® [NCT03663101]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-30Completed
Intranasal Lidocaine for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. A Prospective Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study. [NCT04810494]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-10-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Change in study team)
Efficacy of Topical Calcipotriol-assisted Ablative Fractional Laser Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis: 12-month Follow-up Results of a Prospective, Randomised, Comparative Trial [NCT02976727]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Effect of Intracameral Phenylephrine/Ketorolac on Intraoperative Pain [NCT04829799]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to Per study team, the study will not proceed)
Decreasing Propofol Injection Pain by Pre-Treatment With Lidocaine in Pediatric Procedural Sedation [NCT02512783]171 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Interim analysis indicated treatment was effective and statistically significant)
Influence of Dexmedetomidine and Lidocaine on Opioid Consumption, Cognitive Function and Incidence of Neuropathic Pain in Laparoscopic Intestine Resection [NCT02616523]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
A Comparison Between Ketamine-lidocaine Versus Ketamine-fentanyl for Induction on the Hemodynamic Effects in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction :( A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT05502211]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-01Recruiting
A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial of Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical EMLA for Local Anesthesia Before Lumbar Puncture in Children [NCT01628874]66 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Due to low recruitment numbers, the study was terminated.)
Pilot Study: Comparison of Buffered 1% vs. Non-Buffered 2% Lidocaine Used in Dental and Oral Surgical Procedures: Clinical Outcomes Maxilla [NCT02747186]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome With Lidocaine Injection in Patients With Cancer in Palliative Care: a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04703803]Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-17Completed
Comparison of Two Techniques of Administering IV Lidocaine in Reducing Propofol Injection Pain [NCT03057704]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-05Completed
Intravenous Lidocaine Versus Hydromorphone for Acute Abdominal Pain. A Randomized Trial [NCT03300674]Phase 4154 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-10Completed
Randomized, Single Center, Masked Study Comparing the Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection After Topical Anesthesia Versus Petrolatum Ointment [NCT03799484]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-04Completed
An Observer-blinded Randomized Study of Propofol Infusion vs Bolus Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation for Pediatric Magnetic Resonance Imaging [NCT03513757]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-04Completed
Therapy to Prevent Sexual Pain in Menopausal Survivors of Breast Cancer [NCT01539317]Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Effect of Perioperative Lidocaine on Gastrointestinal Function Recovery After Lumbar Spine Surgery in Adults: a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study [NCT04922359]96 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-01Not yet recruiting
Study of Pain Control With Hormonal IUS Insertion (SOPHI Study) [NCT02352714]Phase 498 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Randomized Controlled Trial of Local Lidocaine Gel and Intrauterine Lidocaine Infusion for Pain Relief During Saline Infusion Sonohysterography [NCT02355522]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Completed
Effects of Anesthetics on Inflammatory Markers in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgeries. [NCT04630938]81 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-24Completed
Effect of Intracervical Anesthesia on Pain Associated With the Insertion of Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System in Nulligravida Women: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03111342]Phase 4300 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-01Completed
Long-term Efficacy of Ablative Fractional Laser-assisted Photodynamic Therapy for Treatment of Lower Extremity Bowen's Disease: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial With 5-year Follow up [NCT03320447]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-30Completed
A Comparison of Collagen, Lidocaine and Saline Intramuscular Injections, in Myofascial Pain Patients With Trigger Points in Masseter Muscle. [NCT03323567]Early Phase 143 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-10Completed
A Comparison of Quadriceps Muscle Weakness Associated With PENG Blockade or Femoral Nerve Blockade for Patients Undergoing Neck of Femur (NOF) Fracture Surgery [NCT05002725]64 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-28Recruiting
Efficacy of External Nasal Nerve Block on Postoperative Agitation Following Nasal Surgeries Under General Anesthesia. Randomized, Controlled Trial [NCT03069027]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-15Completed
A Study Comparing the Supraglottic Airway Devices and Endotracheal Tube During Controlled Ventilation for Laparoscopic Surgery [NCT02462915]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-06-30Recruiting
Articaine Versus Lidocaine in Only Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia for the Extraction of Mandibular Anterior Teeth.Asplit Mouth Clinical Trail [NCT05223075]Phase 231 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-11Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Nebulized Lidocaine, Salbutamol, and Beclomethasone Plus Salbutamol in the Covid-19 Patients With ARDS on Non-invasive Ventilation; Randomized Control Trial [NCT04979923]Phase 181 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-01Recruiting
A Novel Concept for Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block - Popliteal Region [NCT02456597]16 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
Intravenous Lignocaine as an Analgesic Adjunct in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery (IGNITE-AIS Study) [NCT04931433]Phase 4102 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-24Recruiting
A Randomized, Within-subject Controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Pain Relief of Modified Sodium Hyaluronate Gel for Injection When Used for the Correction of Moderate or Severe Nasolabial Folds [NCT04569045]130 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-20Completed
The Role of Intra-articular Injection of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteriods in Treatment of Synovitis in Lumbar Facet Joint Disease [NCT04860531]Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-17Completed
Comparison of Lidocaine, Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine in Multimodal Analgesia Management Following Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial [NCT04836819]78 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-08Completed
Does Addition of Longer-acting Local Anesthetic Improve the Post-operative Pain After Carpal Tunnel Release? A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT04833777]140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-01Recruiting
Ultrasound-guided Median Nerve Block With Dextrose 5% Hydrodissection: Determination of the Minimal Effective Volume of Local Anesthetic [NCT02438657]Phase 2/Phase 352 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-21Completed
The Effect of Retrobulbar Block on Bi-Hemispheric Cerebral Oxygen Saturation and Early Period Postoperative Cognitive Functions With Lidocaine and Levobupivacaine in Elderly Patients With Ophthalmic Surgery [NCT03189329]Phase 466 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
An Evaluation of Oral Midazolam for Anxiety and Pain in First-trimester Surgical Abortion: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01830881]Phase 4124 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Two Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine as Adjuncts to Lidocaine for Intravenous Regional Anesthesia: Randomized Clinical Trial. [NCT03399474]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-01Completed
Use of Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Treatment of Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Versus Corticosteroid Injection Sonographically Guided [NCT03180125]Phase 180 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-15Completed
Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Lidocaine Spray Versus Tramadol and Fentanyl for Pain Control in Rib Fractures: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled and Open-label Study [NCT05500677]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-01Completed
Effect of Endovenous Lidocaine on Analgesia and Serum Cytokines Concentration: Randomized and Double-blind Trial [NCT02363699]Phase 444 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
The Effect of Local Anesthetic Volume Within the Adductor Canal on Quadriceps Function Evaluated by Electromyography: A Randomized, Observer-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Study in Volunteers. [NCT02344589]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Non-surgical Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Night Splint Versus Local Corticosteroid Infiltration: Clinical Randomized Trial [NCT03196817]Phase 484 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-01Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of the Feasibility and Efficacy of Lidocaine Mucilage-ICG as an Optical Agent to Detect Cancer Tissue Delineation During Breast-conserving Surgery [NCT04438577]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-20Recruiting
Comparison of Two Different Concentrations of Local Anesthetic in Patient Reported Pain in Oculoplastic Surgery [NCT06121141]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-07Enrolling by invitation
Pan Facial Volume Restoration With a New Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler [NCT01545557]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-21Completed
Effect of Self-administered Lidocaine In-situ Gel Prior to Intrauterine Device Insertion in Women With no Previous Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT03166111]Phase 3216 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-01Completed
A Novel Approach in Reducing Dental Pain and Anxiety of Pediatric Patient During Local Anesthesia. A Clinical Experimental Study [NCT04585061]31 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-01Completed
Splanchnic Nerve Block for Acute Heart Failure [NCT02669407]14 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-01Completed
Lidocaine Patches Prior to Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation [NCT05783219]Phase 234 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-01Recruiting
The Analgesic Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in Combination of Analgesia Nociception Index Monitoring in Spine Surgery. [NCT05103215]Phase 490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-30Not yet recruiting
Efficacy of Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine in Sedation for ERCP: a Randomised Placebo-controlled Study [NCT04439773]Phase 4130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Recruiting
Intravenous and Intraperitoneal Lignocaine for Perioperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Colon Resections [NCT03105193]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-17Completed
Comparison of Lidocaine Spray With Forced Coughing in Pain Relief During Colposcopy Guided Cervical Biopsy Procedure: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03100565]96 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine on Endometriosis Pain [NCT01968694]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
A Phase 2/3 Prospective, Multicentre Randomized, Double-blind Trial, Comparing Intra-discal Allogeneic Adult BM-MSC Therapy and Sham-treated Controls in Subjects With Chronic LBP Due to Lumbar DDD Unresponsive to Conventional Therapy [NCT03737461]Phase 2/Phase 3113 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-18Active, not recruiting
Comparison Between Ultrasound Guided Ozone, Platelet-Rich Plasma or Steroid Injection in the Treatment of Sacroiliitis; a Randomized Double Blinded Controlled Study [NCT05914350]105 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-23Recruiting
A Clinical Study Using Omeza Products in Combination With Standard of Care for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers [NCT05417425]25 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-01Recruiting
Diclofenac Plus Lidocaine Gel for Pain Relief During Intrauterine Device (IUD) Insertion. A Randomized Double Blinded Placebo-controlled Study [NCT02332057]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Completed
Comparison Between Lidocaine Inhalation and Intravenous Dexamethasone to Reduce Pain After Laryngeal Mask Insertion [NCT03139591]196 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-01Completed
The Application of Topical Pharyngeal Anesthesia in the Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Under Sedation [NCT03070379]300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-02-20Recruiting
Refining Paracervical Block Techniques for Pain Control in First Trimester Surgical Abortion [NCT01466491]Phase 4332 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine on Serum THBS2, MMPS and VEGF-C in Patients Undergoing Radical Hyterectomy Surgery After General Anesthesia [NCT05560035]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-01Not yet recruiting
Comparative Evaluation of Adding Dexamethasone to 2% Lidocaine (With and Without Epinephrine) on the Anesthetic Success Rate of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis [NCT05361291]124 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-01Completed
Self-administered Intravaginal 2% Lidocaine Gel Prior to Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous Women: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01534520]61 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Paracervical Block With Ketorolac and Lidocaine in First Trimester Surgical Abortions [NCT00617097]Phase 2/Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Use of 5% Lidocaine Ointment in the Treatment of Vulvar Vestibulitis [NCT00450242]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Terminated(stopped due to lack of funding)
The Value of a High-Volume Image-Guided Injection in Chronic Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy: a Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial [NCT02996409]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-31Completed
The Effect of Intracervical Lidocaine Injection Versus Topical Lidocaine Gel on the Pain Experienced by Patients Undergoing Tenaculum Application to the Cervix at the Time of an Office Gynecologic Procedure [NCT01421641]Phase 474 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
The Prevalence of Local IgE Elevation and Its Effect on Intranasal Capsaicin Therapy in the Non-allergic Rhinitis Population [NCT05093478]Phase 333 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-10Recruiting
Efficacy of Corticosteroid Injection Into Coracohumeral Ligament in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder [NCT03013205]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-02-28Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Corticosteroid Injection Versus Corticosteroid Injection and Hydrodissection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome [NCT04346030]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-17Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Synera in OA Pain [NCT01654302]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Reducing Urethral Pain During Urodynamic Test - Comparison Between Lidocaine Gel and Paraffin Oil [NCT01837628]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-02-28Recruiting
Cystoscopy in Females: Is There a Difference Between Rigid and Flex Cystoscopy, and Does it Require Local Anasthesia? [NCT03210038]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-01Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 3% Mepivacaine Plus 2% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocks. [NCT01574807]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Lidocaine Infusion for Chronic Pain in Opioid Dependent Patients [NCT02219321]Phase 33 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of Funding)
Topical Lidocaine Gel With and Without Subconjunctival Lidocaine Injection for Intravitreal Injection: a Within-patient Study [NCT01640171]57 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Comparison of Two Induction Regimens Using Topical Lidocaine or Muscle Relaxant; Impact on Postoperative Sore Throat and Haemodynamics [NCT03031808]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-10-31Recruiting
Adjuvants to Ultrasonic Guided Interscalene Block In Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair; Morphine and/or Nalbuphine [NCT03034382]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-01-31Recruiting
Intraoperative Lidocaine Infusion as a Sole Analgesic Versus Morphine in Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Surgery [NCT05150756]Early Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-01Completed
Effect of Synera in Reducing Pain Associated With Venipuncture and Superficial Dermatologic Procedures [NCT01744197]Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Evaluation of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Hand Surgery Using Local Anesthesia With Adrenaline [NCT04029610]110 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-14Completed
Phase 1, Randomized, Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study of Bolus Intravenous Lidocaine 0.7 mg/kg, Lidocaine Patch 1.8%, and Lidocaine Patch 5% (Lidoderm®) in Healthy Subjects [NCT04144192]Phase 158 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-28Completed
[NCT01673542]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate Combined to Diclofenac Versus Intravenous Lidocaine Combined to Diclofenac Versus Diclofenac Alone in the ED Treatment of Renal Colic. A Randomized Double Blind Study. [NCT03199924]Phase 2600 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-01Completed
High Dose Intravenous Lidocaine vs Hydromorphone for Acute Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized, Comparative Efficacy Trial [NCT04398316]Phase 4187 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-18Recruiting
Lidocaine Infusion as a Treatment for Cocaine Relapse and Craving [NCT01929343]Phase 284 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Lidocaine Spray 10% Versus Oral Ibuprofen Tablets in Pain Control During Copper Intrauterine Device Insertion (A Randomized Controlled Trial) [NCT05241496]1 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-15Recruiting
Lidocaine Infusion Versus Oral Diclofenac During Outpatient Hystroscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03825016]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-01Completed
[NCT01892332]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
A Prospective Controlled Treatment Trial for Post-Traumatic Headaches [NCT03007420]Phase 363 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-02Recruiting
Comparison of Lidocaine Versus Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Prospective Study [NCT02818894]Phase 4135 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-27Terminated(stopped due to This study was terminated due to pressing matters related to the COVID-19 pandemic - staff shortages and changes of personnel, data gaps due to the pandemic, participants not being able to continue follow-up visits, and ongoing enrollment issues.)
A Randomized, Evaluator-blinded, Comparative Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Lip Injections With Emervel Lips Lidocaine and Juvéderm Volbella With Lidocaine [NCT01916278]0 participants Interventional2013-09-30Completed
A Phase 2a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of LiRIS® in Women With Interstitial Cystitis Followed by an Open Label Extension [NCT01475253]Phase 2104 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Terminated(stopped due to This study was not enrolled completely and was terminated.)
Characterizing and Comparing the Duration of Local Anesthetic in Dermatologic Surgery [NCT05767749]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-03-14Completed
Multimodal Opioid-free Anesthesia Versus Opioid-based Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Valve Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04648540]Early Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-01Completed
Randomized Controlled Trial of Cervical Lidocaine for Intrauterine Device Insertion Pain [NCT01411995]200 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Pilot Pharmacokinetic Study of Dose Adjustment of Vinorelbine in Patients With Varying Degree of Liver Dysfunction [NCT00540982]Phase 1/Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-12-31Completed
Methemoglobin Levels in Generally Anesthetized Pediatric Dental Patients Receiving Prilocaine Versus Lidocaine [NCT01402869]91 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Efficacy of Topical Lidocaine to Decrease Discomfort With Intranasal Midazolam Administration: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT02396537]77 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Double Blind Trial of Pediatric Lumbar Puncture Under Sedation/Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) With and Without EMLA Cream [NCT01516684]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-14Completed
Added Value of Systemic Lidocaine in Combination With Local Infiltration Analgesia for Knee Arthroscopic Procedures [NCT03599427]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-01Completed
Subcutaneous Tranexamic Acid in Nasal Mohs Local Flap Reconstruction: Perioperative Bleeding, Edema, and Ecchymosis [NCT06057675]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
Post-procedural Pain Associated With Periurethral Block at Time of Bulkamid Injection for SUI: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT06043063]52 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-01Recruiting
Effectiveness of Topical Morphine Use in Patients With Painful Neoplastic Wounds in the Breast and Head and Neck: Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial - MorphineGEL [NCT05800834]Phase 2106 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-12Recruiting
Evaluation of the Effect of Buffered Anesthetic Solution (Lidocaine 2%) in the Effectiveness of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Injection During the Treatment of Mandibular Primary Molars [NCT05793905]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-12-01Completed
Pilot Study of Early Postoperative Fractional Ablative Laser Treatment of Skin Grafts for Burns [NCT04176705]9 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-14Completed
Pain Control in Breast Surgery: Analgesia, Opioid Consumption and Inflammatory Response Evaluation [NCT02647385]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Active, not recruiting
Awake Fiber Optic Intubation (AFOI) in Patients With Stenosis of the Upper Airway: Utility of the Laryngeal Nervous Block [NCT03586323]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-04-15Recruiting
Is it Possible to Replace Fentanyl by Non Narcotic Medication for Induction and Maintenance of Anesthesia in Minor Procedures? [NCT03806374]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-02Completed
Intravenous Lidocaine Continuous-infusion to Supress of Cough Reflex During Anesthesia Emergence: Dose-finding Adaptive Trial [NCT03805282]Phase 3132 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-01Recruiting
Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine at Alleviating Pain Associated With Propofol Infusion in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Procedural Sedation [NCT00786916]Phase 4109 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
The Effectiveness of Automated Soft Tissue Vibration in Reducing Pain and Accelerating Action of Intraoral Local Anesthesia Injections in Adult Dental Patients. A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial. [NCT03839134]166 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-20Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Active-Comparator, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Study of the Efficacy of Continuous Nerve Block vs Single Block Plus Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Pain. [NCT04208516]Phase 417 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-26Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment was unable to be obtained in a timely fashion, so the study was stopped.)
Better Short-Term Outcomes With The 'U-Method' Compared to the 'Hammock' Technique for the Implantation of the TVT-SECUR Under Local Anesthesia [NCT00904618]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Multi-Center, Randomized, Single Masked Phase 2 Study of Intravitreal Injections of Sirolimus in the Treatment of Geographic Atrophy Associated With Age-Related Macular Degeneration [NCT01675947]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Terminated(stopped due to On May 30, 2014, study injections were discontinued at the request of the DSMC. No further recruitment will occur.)
A Phase 4 Pediatric Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Oraqix Gel in Healthy Children and Adolescent Volunteers Following Tooth Extraction [NCT01591616]Phase 416 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Efficacy of Pethidine, Ketorolac And Xylocaine Gel As Analgesics For Pain Control In Shockwave Lithotripsy Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03032458]Phase 4165 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Completed
Psoas Sciatic Blockade Could be a Sole Anaesthetic Technique for Total Knee Arthroplasty [NCT03088371]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-10Completed
Effect of Abdominal Wall Injections on Abdominal Pain [NCT06121466]Phase 445 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-01Active, not recruiting
A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Pecs Blocks Types I and II as a Method for Administering the Non-Opioid Anesthetic Exparel in Order to Mitigate Postoperative Narcotic Usage, Pain, Nausea, and Hospital Stay in Patients Undergoing I [NCT05171179]Phase 390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-22Recruiting
Comparison of Great Occipital Nerve and Supraorbital Nerve Blockade Treatment Methods Individually and in Combination With Placebo in an Acute Migraine Attack in the Emergency Department, a Prospective, Double Blind, Randomized Controlled Study [NCT04491474]Phase 4128 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-15Completed
Ambulatory Infusion of Lidocaine and Ketamine for Management of Chronic Pain: An Observational Prospective Study [NCT03249025]72 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-09-01Not yet recruiting
The Effectiveness of Lumbar Transforaminal Anterior Epidural Steroid Injections in Discogenic Low Back Pain Associated With Modic Type-1 Change [NCT04930211]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-05Recruiting
A Randomized, Multicenter, Evaluator-Blinded, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Design Investigation to Evaluate Performance and Safety of YVOIRE Volume Plus Versus Restylane Lyft With Lidocaine for Temporary Improvement of Mid-face Volume [NCT04784299]105 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-22Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Evaluator Blinded, Split-hand Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Restylane Lyft With Lidocaine Compared to no Treatment for Injection in the Dorsal Hand to Correct Volume Deficit [NCT02650921]92 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Effect of Lidocaine Infusion on Acute Rehabilitation After Radical Cystectomy [NCT03047057]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-03Completed
The Co-administration of Dexamethasone or Adrenaline With Lignocaine 2% Prologues Duration in Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block- :A Comparative Study [NCT04850885]Phase 383 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-01Completed
Nebulized Lignocaine for Topical Airway Anesthesia During Flexible Bronchoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03040193]200 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-15Completed
Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Comparison Between Conventional Versus Bispectral Index Guided Approach and Effect of Diclofenac Sodium Along With Topical Pharyngeal Anaesthesia [NCT04860167]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-10Completed
Alkalinization of Adrenalized Lidocaine in Extending Epidural Analgesia for Extremely Urgent Cesarean Section During Labor: a Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT05313256]Phase 2/Phase 366 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-14Recruiting
General Anesthesia for Endovascular Thrombectomy; A Pilot Study. [NCT02639806]34 participants (Actual)Observational2016-01-31Completed
Analgesic Efficacy of Intrauterine Lidocaine Flushing in Hysterosalpingo-foam Sonography: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04433611]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-17Recruiting
Investigation of the Presence of Piriformis Syndrome Accompanying Lumbar Radiculopathy [NCT05392933]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-15Not yet recruiting
The Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Plain Block Versus Lidocaine Infusion on Acute and Chronic Post-thoracotomy Pain; A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05885230]138 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-01Recruiting
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Cross-over Study of Lidocaine Patch 1.8% in Patients With Moderate to Severe Pain From Carpal Tunnel Syndrome [NCT04245371]Phase 445 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-24Completed
Systemic Absorption of Lidocaine After Ultrasound Guided Hematoma Block for Reduction of Different Types of Pediatric Distal Radius Fractures [NCT04359017]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsoring staff have left institution)
Comparison Between Combined Regional Nasal Block and General Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia With Dexmedetomidine During Endoscopic Sinus Surgery [NCT05361642]70 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-03Recruiting
Ultrasonographic and Electrophysiological Evaluation of The Presence of Radial Tunnel Syndrome in Patients With Resistant Lateral Epicondylitis [NCT04856228]32 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-10Completed
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate Pain and Anxiety During Venipuncture in Pediatric Patients With or Without Pre-treatment by a Topical Anesthetic [NCT00676364]Phase 4114 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
Effect of IV Lidocaine Infusions on Pain [NCT00725504]71 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Opioid-free Anesthesia With a Mixture of Dexmedetomidine-lidocaine-ketamine in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies [NCT05089526]70 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-11Recruiting
Systemic Intraoperative Lidocaine Infusion for Postoperative Pain Management in Obese Patients: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study [NCT01944098]Phase 320 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
Efficacy of Topical Agents in the Treatment of Chrysaora Chinensis Stings [NCT02015195]97 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
A Randomized Trial of Buffered vs Nonbuffered Lidocaine With Epinephrine for Cervical Loop Excision [NCT01405768]Phase 256 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
A Randomized-controlled Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of 4% Nebulized Lignocaine Versus 10% Lignocaine Spray in Patients Undergoing Flexible Bronchoscopy [NCT03109392]Phase 2/Phase 31,050 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-01Completed
A Double-blind, Monocentric, Phase 3 Clinical Study for the Evaluation of Efficacy of a Topical Anesthetic Containing Lidocaine 25mg/g and Prilocaine 25mg/g in Adult Patients of Phototypes I to III in Treatment With CO2 Fractional Laser [NCT03366246]Phase 3120 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-07Completed
Multicenter, Randomized, Split-mouth Study to Evaluate the Acceptance and Preference of Lidocaine Gel Compared to Injection Anesthesia After Non Surgical Periodontal Treatment [NCT03354312]Phase 494 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-05Completed
Comparison of Pain of Conventional to Buffered Local Anesthesia During Injection in Pediatric Dental Patients. A Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized, Crossover Study [NCT01622296]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
The Long-term Effect of Perineural Injection Therapy Versus Steroid in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome [NCT02990962]54 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-31Completed
Randomized Clinical Trial of Lidocaine Analgesia for Urethral Catheterization in Children [NCT01780324]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Effect of Buffered Lidocaine on the Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis [NCT01868776]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Internal Superior Laryngeal Nerve Block on Sore Throat After Intubation by Double-Lumen Bronchial Tube for Thoracoscopic Surgery [NCT05825872]Phase 464 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-05Recruiting
The Effect of Topical Anesthetic Using Lidocaine 2.5%/Prilocaine 2.5% Versus Lidocaine 7%/Tetracaine 7% Cream on Patients' Pain and Operative Experience During Treatment With QSwitched 532nm Laser [NCT02427724]48 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-04-30Active, not recruiting
Lidocaine and Ketamine in Abdominal Surgery [NCT04084548]Phase 3420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-15Recruiting
Intranasal Midazolam in Children as a Pre-Operative Sedative [NCT02314546]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Treatment of Dyspareunia With Fractional CO2 Laser Therapy Versus 4% Topical Lidocaine Gel in the Setting of Breast Cancer Survivors. [NCT03257670]70 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-20Recruiting
Effectiveness of Saline Water and Lidocaine Injections for the Treatment of Intractable Plantar Keratoma: A Randomised Feasibility Study [NCT04777227]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-07Completed
Retrospective Investigation of the Effects of Different Uses of Lidocaine in the Prevention of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation [NCT06107543]80 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-12-01Not yet recruiting
Optimization Lumbar Puncture In Children [NCT02454894]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Due to the reason that not all participants agree to have anesthesia and postoperative management at the same time)
En undersøgelse af Mekanismerne Bag Nociceptiv Desensibilisering forårsaget af Topikal Capsaicin [NCT03587220]44 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-01Completed
Multimodal Analgesia Versus Traditional Opiate Based Analgesia and Cardiac Surgery Outcome [NCT03521167]225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-01Not yet recruiting
Intra-arterial Lidocaine for Pain Control Post Uterine Fibroid Embolization : a Single-center Prospective Randomized Study [NCT02293447]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Does Intraperitoneal Instillation of Lidocaine at Cesarean Delivery Improve Postoperative Analgesia? A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT02264795]204 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
A Dose-Escalating Phase I Study of a Single Injection of Lidocaine Paste (ST-CP) for Spermatic Cord Block in Men With Chronic Scrotal Content Pain [NCT04026945]Phase 1/Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-31Completed
Do Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections With Low-dose Lidocaine Cause Transient Objective Upper Extremity Weakness? A Prospective Randomized [NCT03382925]Phase 416 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-20Terminated(stopped due to Not enough cervical interlaminar patients who meet criteria in order to meet recruitment goals.)
Efficacy of Topical Lidocaine/Prilocaine in Pain Management in Pleurocentesis [NCT05984264]Phase 4118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-01Recruiting
Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Recovery in Liver Surgery, a Randomized Double Blinded Placebo-controlled Study [NCT05153785]Phase 2/Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-15Recruiting
A Pilot Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Infusion of Different Doses of Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients With Open Hepatectomy [NCT05369650]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-27Recruiting
Lecturer of Anesthesia- Anesthesia Department Ain Shams University [NCT05235256]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-10Recruiting
Effect of Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine, Magnesium Sulphate and Remifentanil Perioperatively in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy: a Prospective, Randomized and Double-blind Study [NCT02309879]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Articaine 4% Efficacy and Safety in Extraction and Pulpotomy of Primary Molars of Children Below the Age of Four Years. [NCT05101785]292 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-01Not yet recruiting
Lidocaine With Epinephrine vs. Bupivacaine With Epinephrine as Local Anesthetic Agents in Wide-awake Hand Surgery: an Outcome Study of Patients' Pain Perception. [NCT02315573]61 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
The Immunomodulatory Effects of Ketamine and Lidocaine in Abdominal Surgery: Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study [NCT03821545]82 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-28Completed
Comparative Efficacy of Lidocaine Spray Versus Vaginal Misoprostol in Reducing Pain During IUD Insertion in Adolescents and Nulliparous Women: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04339049]Phase 3147 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-01Completed
Minimal Effective Concentration of Lidocaine in Propofol Lidocaine Mixture for Relief of Pain on Propofol Injection [NCT05165303]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-01Not yet recruiting
Topical Anesthetic Use In Pessary Management: A Randomized Double Blinded Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT02380742]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
Prospective Monocentric Study on the Efficacy of Lidocain Spray for Patient Comfort During Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Enteral Nutrition: the Xylonut Trial [NCT02022059]Phase 361 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
A Cross-over Study of Pharmacokinetic Interaction Comparing Nanoencapsulated Gel of Prilocaine (2.5%), Lidocaine (2.5%) and Association of Prilocaine + Lidocaine 2.5% (Nanorap®) Topically in Healthy Volunteers. [NCT03441841]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-28Completed
Influence of Local Anesthetic Administration on the Cancer Recurrence Rate After Pancreatic Oncologic Surgery [NCT04449289]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Not yet recruiting
Influence of SPI-guided Analgesia With Preventive Different Peribulbar Blocks (PBB) on the Presence of OCR, Postoperative Pain, PONV in Patients Undergoing VRS Under General Anaesthesia: a Randomised, Controlled Trial [NCT03413371]175 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-04-26Recruiting
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for Treating Acute Frontal Migraine Headache in Pediatric Patients [NCT03984045]Phase 372 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-06Recruiting
Wound Infiltration With Ketorolac Versus Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study. [NCT03394001]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-01Active, not recruiting
Lidocaine for Pain Control During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03362905]Phase 4123 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-12-03Not yet recruiting
Intraperitoneal Instillation and Wound Infiltration Compared With Intrathecal Morphine for Postcesarean Section Analgesia : A Prospective Randomized Controlled Double- Blind Trial [NCT05405049]46 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-01Not yet recruiting
Minimum Effective Local Anaesthetic Volume of a 1:1 Mixture of 2% Lidocaine With 5ug/ml of Epinephrine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine Required for Ultrasound Guided Selective Trunk Block: A Dose Finding Study [NCT04773405]25 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-10Completed
The Effectiveness of Mesotherapy (Lidocaine and Proxicam) in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine [NCT06118190]27 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-01Completed
Comparison of Pain and Comfort in Patients Following Cardiac Surgery: Opioid- Morphine Managed Versus Multimodal Pain-management [NCT04987372]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-21Completed
Efficacy of Two Dental Local Anesthetics on the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life After Endodontic Treatment in the Symptomatic Mandibular Molars: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04787731]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-29Suspended(stopped due to COVID-19 and Personnel changes)
Comparison of The Efficacy of Lidocaine-Prilocaine Combination and Vapocoolant Spray to Reduce Pain of IV Cannulation in The Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04473820]Phase 388 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-10Not yet recruiting
Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion During VATS Procedures Reduces Postoperative Analgesic Requirements [NCT01277835]48 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Pain Control in Colorectal Surgery: Liposomal Bupivacaine Block Versus Intravenous Lidociane [NCT04005859]Phase 461 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-22Completed
Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Lidocaine-prilocaine Cream in Reducing Pain During Levonorgestrel IUD Insertion in Women Delivered Only by Cesarean Deliveries [NCT04339348]Phase 3210 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-30Completed
The Efficiency of Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy Applied to the Intermedius Genicular Nerve in the Treatment of Patients With Chondromalacia Patella [NCT05096520]46 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-15Recruiting
Effect of Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine in Comparison to Intravenous Infusion of Dexmedetomidine on Proinflammatory Cytokines and Stress Response in Pelviabdominal Cancer Surgeries [NCT04148599]Phase 354 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-02Completed
A Prospective, Open-label, Multicentre, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness, Safety and Long Term Safety of Saypha® FILLER Lidocaine for Lip Augmentation [NCT04917588]Phase 3114 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-28Completed
Effect of Ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Compound Lidocaine and Esketamine on Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery: a Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial [NCT05122338]160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-01Not yet recruiting
Topical Application of GTN 0.4% in the Treatment of Anismus Following Stapled Haemorrhoidopexy [NCT01279551]Phase 2/Phase 340 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
A Phase III Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Three-Arm Study of Doxepin and a Topical Rinse in the Treatment of Acute Oral Mucositis Pain in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy [NCT02229539]Phase 3275 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
[NCT02176421]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-15Completed
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Belotero Balance® (+) Lidocaine for Volume Augmentation of the Infraorbital Hollow [NCT04594239]150 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-31Completed
A Single Center, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Two Factor Patient-Experience Management Study of ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid Injection) for the Reduction of Localized Subcutaneous Fat in the Submental Area [NCT02007434]Phase 384 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Evaluator-blinded, Parallel Group, no Treatment Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Restylane Lyft Lidocaine for Jawline Definition [NCT05622812]140 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-02-16Active, not recruiting
A Prospective Comparison of Continuous Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion Versus Placebo for Rib Fracture Analgesia [NCT04140396]Phase 41 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-10Terminated(stopped due to Lack of personnel and lack of funding for the study drug)
[NCT02510287]128 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine in the Operative Management of Thyroid Surgery With Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring [NCT02479789]Phase 466 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Active, not recruiting
Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Infusion of Dexmedetomidine vs. Lidocaine on Postoperative Pain, Analgesic Consumption, Bowel Function and Recovery After Abdominal Gynaecological Surgery: a Randomised Double Blind Study [NCT03363425]Phase 2/Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-14Recruiting
Lidocaine Spray Plus Oral Celecoxib for Pain Control During Hysterosalpingography: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04505657]150 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-01Completed
Efficacy of Injected Local Anesthetic vs Topical Anesthetic in Cosmetic Injectable Fillers [NCT02379221]49 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
A Short Term Outcomes of Subacromial Injection of Combined Corticosteroid With Low Volume Compared to High Volume of Local Anesthetic for Rotator Cuff Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trials [NCT03120923]Phase 452 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-01Completed
Simultaneous Versus Sequential Fractional CO2 Laser and Subcision Combination for Post-acne Atrophic Scars: A Split-face Comparative Study. [NCT05688202]34 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-10-24Completed
A Randomized, Subject- and Evaluator-blinded, Controlled, Non-inferiority Multicenter, Parallel Group Comparison Study to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Saypha® VOLUME Lidocaine for Midface Augmentation to Correct Volume Deficit [NCT05386030]Phase 3486 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-16Active, not recruiting
Continous Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion Intraoperative for Craniotomy Tumor Removal Surgery: Effect to Brain Relaxation, Opioid Consumption and Postoperative Cognitive Status [NCT04773093]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-01Recruiting
Multimodal Analgesic Technique for Control of Post-laproscopy Abdominal Pain in Patient Undergoing Diagnostic Gynacological Laproscopy. A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03241602]Phase 488 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-15Completed
Effect of Total Intravenous Anesthesia by Targeted Controlled Infusion on Surgical Stress Response Compared to Inhalational Anesthesia [NCT06024733]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-07Recruiting
Uddevalla Skövde Transscleral Micropulse Study: Efficacy and Safety of Micro Pulse Transscleral Laser Treatment (MP-TLT) in Glaucoma Patients Performed in Topical Lidocaine Anaesthesia [NCT05557721]40 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-10-06Enrolling by invitation
Determination of ED90 of Intrathecal Lidocaine for Adequate Anesthesia for Elective Cervical Cerclage Surgery [NCT02574832]2 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Terminated(stopped due to planned surgical procedures decreased)
A Randomized, Evaluator-blinded, Parallel Group, Comparator-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of GP0112 for Cheek Augmentation and Correction of Midface Contour Deficiencies [NCT05098457]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-02-22Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor decision)
Five Period Crossover Study of the Ability of Late Sodium or Calcium Current Block (Mexiletine, Lidocaine, or Diltiazem) to Balance the Electrocardiographic Effects of hERG Potassium Current Block (Dofetilide or Moxifloxacin) [NCT02308748]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia Versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Anesthesia for the Extraction of Primary Mandibular Molars: A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT05221190]112 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-01Completed
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Ethanol Injection of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms [NCT02158039]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00203294 (1) [back to overview]Headache Severity as Measured on an 11-point Verbal Scale (0 to 10):0=No Pain 10=Excruciating Pain
NCT00427648 (7) [back to overview]Average Weekly NRS for Frequency at 6 Weeks
NCT00427648 (7) [back to overview]Median Number of Daily Voiding Episodes at 12 Months.
NCT00427648 (7) [back to overview]SF-12 Physical at 6 Weeks
NCT00427648 (7) [back to overview]Median Number of Daily Voiding Episodes (by 3-day Voiding Diary) at Six Weeks.
NCT00427648 (7) [back to overview]Cystometric Assessment of Maximal Bladder Capacity at 6 Weeks Only.
NCT00427648 (7) [back to overview]Global Assessment of Change - Frequency at 6 Weeks
NCT00427648 (7) [back to overview]OAB-q (Symptom Scale) at 6 Weeks
NCT00444626 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Repeat Treatment Period
NCT00444626 (8) [back to overview]Participant Product Preference at Week 24
NCT00444626 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least a 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Blinded Evaluator's Assessment of Wrinkle Severity at Week 24
NCT00444626 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Blinded Evaluator's Assessment of Nasolabial Folds (NLF) Wrinkle Severity at Week 36
NCT00444626 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Blinded Evaluator's Assessment of Nasolabial Fold (NLF) Wrinkle Severity at Week 24
NCT00444626 (8) [back to overview]Participant's Pain Assessment During the Initial Treatment Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
NCT00444626 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Initial Treatment Period
NCT00444626 (8) [back to overview]Participant Product Preference at Week 36
NCT00450242 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Report the Ability to Have Intercourse
NCT00450242 (2) [back to overview]Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scores With Intercourse From Baseline to Week 8
NCT00484159 (2) [back to overview]Successful Treatment
NCT00484159 (2) [back to overview]Cost Per Successful Procedure
NCT00487084 (4) [back to overview]Supplemental Analgesia in First 48 Hours
NCT00487084 (4) [back to overview]Supplemental Analgesia in First 90 Minutes
NCT00487084 (4) [back to overview]Verbal Rating Score (0 to 10) for Pain (VRPS)
NCT00487084 (4) [back to overview]Duration of Continuing Analgesia
NCT00530803 (5) [back to overview]Blinded Observer's Subjective Ratings of the Participant's Pain Level at 5 Minutes Post Venipuncture Procedure, Using a 6-point NRS
NCT00530803 (5) [back to overview]Blinded Observer's Subjective Ratings of the Participant's Pain Level at Needle Insertion, Using a 6-point NRS
NCT00530803 (5) [back to overview]Parent Rating of Child's Pain Using a 6-point NRS
NCT00530803 (5) [back to overview]Participants Self-rating of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.
NCT00530803 (5) [back to overview]Blinded Observer's Subjective Ratings of Participants' Pain Level at Tourniquet Placement, Using a 6-point NRS
NCT00533468 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Procedures With Success
NCT00533468 (3) [back to overview]Time of Procedure
NCT00533468 (3) [back to overview]Neonatal Facial Coding System Score
NCT00540982 (2) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve
NCT00540982 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Toxicities
NCT00552695 (2) [back to overview]Pain on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
NCT00552695 (2) [back to overview]Success of Intravenous (IV) Insertion
NCT00556478 (10) [back to overview]Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT): Change From Baseline to During 3 Month Double Blind-treatment
NCT00556478 (10) [back to overview]Change in the Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE) Domains of Ejaculatory Control, Distress and Sexual Satisfaction From Baseline to Month 1
NCT00556478 (10) [back to overview]Change in Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) From Baseline to Month 3
NCT00556478 (10) [back to overview]Partner Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) at Month 3
NCT00556478 (10) [back to overview]Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE): Change From Baseline to End of Month 3
NCT00556478 (10) [back to overview]Change in the Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE) Domains of Ejaculatory Control, Distress and Sexual Satisfaction From Baseline to Month 2
NCT00556478 (10) [back to overview]Subject Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) at Month 2
NCT00556478 (10) [back to overview]Subject PEP at Month 1
NCT00556478 (10) [back to overview]Subject Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) at Month 3
NCT00556478 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) > 1 Minute and >2 Minutes During the 3 Months of Double-blind Treatment
NCT00585325 (1) [back to overview]Pain During Dressing Change
NCT00587483 (7) [back to overview]Incidence of Arrhythmias in the Post-Operative Period
NCT00587483 (7) [back to overview]Incidence of Arrhythmias Other Than Ventricular Fibrillation
NCT00587483 (7) [back to overview]Number of Defibrillation Attempts
NCT00587483 (7) [back to overview]Use of Vasopressors
NCT00587483 (7) [back to overview]Participants Experiencing Ventricular Fibrillation Requiring Defibrillation During the 60 Minute Period Following Myocardial Reperfusion
NCT00587483 (7) [back to overview]Time to Discharge From the Hospital
NCT00587483 (7) [back to overview]Time to Discharge From the Intensive Care Unit
NCT00588354 (8) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Score at 4 Weeks as Measured by Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS)
NCT00588354 (8) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Score at 2 Weeks as Measured by Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS)
NCT00588354 (8) [back to overview]Pain Disability Score at 4 Weeks as Measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
NCT00588354 (8) [back to overview]Pain Score at 4 Weeks as Measured by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI)
NCT00588354 (8) [back to overview]Pain Score at 2 Weeks as Measured by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI)
NCT00588354 (8) [back to overview]Pain Disability Score at 2 Weeks as Measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
NCT00588354 (8) [back to overview]Pain Disability Score at 2 Weeks as Measured by Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI)
NCT00588354 (8) [back to overview]Pain Disability Score at 4 Weeks as Measured by Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire
NCT00589979 (16) [back to overview]Overall Treatment Difference in LSMeans for Verran Snyder-Halpern (VSH) Sleep Scale
NCT00589979 (16) [back to overview]Investigator Global Impression of Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis (OA) Pain
NCT00589979 (16) [back to overview]Investigator Global Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction
NCT00589979 (16) [back to overview]Exit Status From Current Study Treatment - Yes
NCT00589979 (16) [back to overview]Overall Treatment Difference in the LSMeans of the Average of the Last Two Daily Pain Relief Scale (PRS) Scores
NCT00589979 (16) [back to overview]Overall Treatment Difference in LSMeans of Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Total Score
NCT00589979 (16) [back to overview]Overall Treatment Difference in LSMeans for Continuous EuroQol Quality of Life Instrument (EQ-5D) Index Scores
NCT00589979 (16) [back to overview]Overall Treatment Difference in the LSMeans of the Average of the Last Two Daily Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS)
NCT00589979 (16) [back to overview]Overall Treatment Difference in LSMeans for Continuous EuroQol Quality of Life Instrument (EQ-5D) Health Status Today Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
NCT00589979 (16) [back to overview]Time-to-Exit From Current Study Treatment
NCT00589979 (16) [back to overview]Time-to-Exit Due to Lack of Efficacy
NCT00589979 (16) [back to overview]Quality of Life: Three-Category EuroQol Quality of Life Instrument (EQ-5D) General Health Today Compared to Last 12 Months
NCT00589979 (16) [back to overview]Quality of Life: Four Category Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Composite Score
NCT00589979 (16) [back to overview]Patient Global Impression of Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis (OA) Pain
NCT00589979 (16) [back to overview]Patient Global Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction
NCT00589979 (16) [back to overview]Overall Treatment Difference of the LSMeans of the Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS) Scores
NCT00590590 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Vulvar Vestibulitis Syndrome (VVS)-Related Discomfort Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at End of Treatment (12 Weeks) [0 = No Discomfort and 100 = Most Severe Discomfort]
NCT00590590 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Marinoff Dyspareunia Scale Score at End of Treatment (12 Weeks)
NCT00590590 (6) [back to overview]Mean Marinoff Dyspareunia Scale Score (MDSS) at End of Treatment (12 Weeks)
NCT00590590 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Tenderness (on a 0- to 3-point Scale) on Palpation at End of Treatment (12 Weeks) [Scale Rates the Severity of Pain; 0 =Absent and 3 = Severe]
NCT00590590 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Vulvar Vestibulitis Symptoms Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at End of Treatment (12 Weeks) [0 = No Symptoms and 100 = As Bad as They Can be]
NCT00590590 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Intercourse-Related Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at End of Treatment (12 Weeks) [0 = No Pain and 100 = Most Severe Pain]
NCT00597766 (4) [back to overview]BPI 12 (Brief Pain Inventory, Question 12) Pain Questionnaire
NCT00597766 (4) [back to overview]Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment, Upper Limb Domain
NCT00597766 (4) [back to overview]Pain Free Abduction Range of Motion (ROM)
NCT00597766 (4) [back to overview]Pain Free External Rotation Range of Motion (ROM)
NCT00613821 (1) [back to overview]The Effects of an Intrauterine Lidocaine Infusion to Standard Paracervical Block on Decreasing Patient Pain Measured by Visual Analog Scale in First Trimester Abortions.
NCT00613834 (3) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction With the Essure Tubal Sterilization Procedure
NCT00613834 (3) [back to overview]Change in Patient-perceived Pain Between Baseline and Cannulization
NCT00613834 (3) [back to overview]Patient Perceived Pain 30 Minutes Post-procedure
NCT00617097 (4) [back to overview]Reported Symptoms
NCT00617097 (4) [back to overview]Complications
NCT00617097 (4) [back to overview]Visual Analogue Scale Regarding Satisfaction Level
NCT00617097 (4) [back to overview]Level of Pain During Specific Time Intervals Throughout D&C Procedure.
NCT00628355 (2) [back to overview]Intensity of Pain
NCT00628355 (2) [back to overview]Clinical Response Rate
NCT00651313 (1) [back to overview]The Primary Efficacy Variable Will be the Time-weighted Average Pain Intensity Over 4 Treatment Days Using the 4 Point Categorical Scale.
NCT00653861 (3) [back to overview]Comparative Pain
NCT00653861 (3) [back to overview]Nasolabial Fold (NLF) Severity
NCT00653861 (3) [back to overview]Procedural Pain Score
NCT00657358 (5) [back to overview]Cold Pain
NCT00657358 (5) [back to overview]Electrical Pain
NCT00657358 (5) [back to overview]Tactile Sensation
NCT00657358 (5) [back to overview]Ischemic Pain
NCT00657358 (5) [back to overview]Heat Pain
NCT00659633 (1) [back to overview]Pain Perception
NCT00676364 (2) [back to overview]Anxiety of Venipuncture
NCT00676364 (2) [back to overview]Pain From Venipuncture
NCT00678379 (7) [back to overview]Number and Percent of Participants Able to Tolerate Only a Soft Diet
NCT00678379 (7) [back to overview]Number and Percent of Participants Able to Tolerate a Regular Diet
NCT00678379 (7) [back to overview]Total Time Until Discharge From Hospital.
NCT00678379 (7) [back to overview]Median Number of Pain Medication Doses
NCT00678379 (7) [back to overview]Total Number of Post-operative Doses of Analgesics.
NCT00678379 (7) [back to overview]Number and Percent of Participants Able to Tolerate Only Liquids
NCT00678379 (7) [back to overview]Mean Visual Analog Scale Pain Number.
NCT00682357 (4) [back to overview]Change in Serum Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b)
NCT00682357 (4) [back to overview]Change in Serum Osteocalcin
NCT00682357 (4) [back to overview]Change in Serum Cortisol
NCT00682357 (4) [back to overview]Change in Testosterone
NCT00686127 (1) [back to overview]Change in Pain Intensity on an 11-point Scale From Baseline to 12 Weeks
NCT00686231 (2) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Radial Artery Diameter to Compare Combination of Nitroglycerin or Placebo and Lidocaine (20mg or 40mg)
NCT00686231 (2) [back to overview]Percent Change in Diameter of Radial Artery as a Dose Test for Nitroglycerin
NCT00716443 (15) [back to overview]"Number of Participants Who Answered the Question If You Experienced Pain, Was it What You Expected From the Injection Procedure? Three Hours After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds"
NCT00716443 (15) [back to overview]"Number of Participants Who Answered the Question What Level of Pain Did You Experience When You Were Injected? Three Hours After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds"
NCT00716443 (15) [back to overview]"Number of Participants With Yes/no Answers to Question to Investigator Did the Topical Anesthetics Provide Adequate Anesthesia for the Injections of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds Procedure? Day of Injection of Restylane® Into Nasolabial Folds"
NCT00716443 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Each Category of the Blinded Evaluator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain Scale Immediately After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds
NCT00716443 (15) [back to overview]"Number of Participants Who Answered the Question Still Speaking to the Topical Anesthetic You Had on the Right/Left Side of Your Face, Would You Recommend it to Your Friend or Family Member? 3 Hours After Injection of Restylane® Into Nasolabial Folds"
NCT00716443 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Each Category of the Blinded Evaluator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain Scale One Hour After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds
NCT00716443 (15) [back to overview]Subject's Pain Evaluation by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Upon First Needlestick, Immediately After Injection, One Hour After Injection and Three Hours After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds
NCT00716443 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Each Category of the Investigator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain Scale Three Hours After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds
NCT00716443 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Each Category of the Investigator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain Scale One Hour After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds
NCT00716443 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Each Category of the Investigator Evaluation of the Subject's Post Procedure Pain Assessment Scale Upon First Needle Stick of Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds
NCT00716443 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Each Category of the Investigator Evaluation of the Subject's Post Procedure Pain Assessment Scale Immediately After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds
NCT00716443 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Each Category of the Blinded Evaluator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain Scale Upon First Needle Stick of Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds
NCT00716443 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Each Category of the Blinded Evaluator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain Scale Three Hours After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds
NCT00716443 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Tolerability Assessments Resulting in Adverse Events From Baseline to Two Days After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds
NCT00716443 (15) [back to overview]"Number of Participants Who Answered the Question If it Was Different Than What You Expected, Was it? Three Hours After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds"
NCT00720330 (5) [back to overview]Time From the End of Surgery to Readiness for Hospital Discharge.
NCT00720330 (5) [back to overview]Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents
NCT00720330 (5) [back to overview]Pre- and Intra-operative Opioid Consumption in Fentanyl Equivalents
NCT00720330 (5) [back to overview]Pain Scores on Numerical Rating Scale
NCT00720330 (5) [back to overview]Postoperative Nausea
NCT00721110 (5) [back to overview]Total Opioid Consumption at PACU Admission and Discharge as Well as Mornings of Postoperative Days 1 and 2
NCT00721110 (5) [back to overview]Presence of Nausea and Vomiting After Two Hours in the PACU and the First Postoperative Day
NCT00721110 (5) [back to overview]Verbal Response Fatigue Score on Postoperative Day 1
NCT00721110 (5) [back to overview]The Effects of Lidocaine and Ketamine on Functional Recovery Assessed by 6 Minute Walk Test on Postoperative Day Two
NCT00721110 (5) [back to overview]Verbal Response Pain Scores (VRS) at PACU Admission and Discharge as Well as Mornings and Afternoons of Postoperative Days 1 and 2
NCT00725504 (1) [back to overview]Present Pain Intensity
NCT00769392 (2) [back to overview]Discomfort Associated With the Intravitreal Injection
NCT00769392 (2) [back to overview]Discomfort From Anesthesia Used Prior to Intravitreal Injections
NCT00786916 (1) [back to overview]Maximal Pain/Discomfort
NCT00798018 (1) [back to overview]Visual Analogue Scale(0-100mm) by the Subject.
NCT00804609 (1) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Extended Release Epidural Morphine (EREM)
NCT00811187 (1) [back to overview]Assessment of Pain on a 10-point Visual Analog Pain Scale During the Procedure.
NCT00816751 (2) [back to overview]Pain Score, as Assessed Using a 10 cm Linear Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
NCT00816751 (2) [back to overview]Gestational Age at Time of Procedure
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]No Pain on Three Point Likert Scale on Dorsiflexion of Wrist
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]No Pain on Three Point Likert Scale on Isometric Extension of Third Finger
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]No Pain on Three Point Likert Scale on Isometric Extension of Third Finger
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]No Pain on Three Point Likert Scale on Isometric Extension of Third Finger
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]No Pain on Three Point Likert Scale on Isometric Extension of Third Finger
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Overall Complaint on 100 mm VAS-scale as Recorded by the Study Doctors
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Overall Complaint on 100 mm VAS-scale as Recorded by the Study Doctors
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Overall Complaint on 100 mm VAS-scale as Recorded by the Study Doctors
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Overall Complaint on 100 mm VAS-scale as Recorded by the Study Doctors
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Pain as Recorded by the Study Doctors on a 100 mm VAS-scale
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Pain as Recorded by the Study Doctors on a 100 mm VAS-scale (Visual Analog Scale).
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Pain as Recorded by the Study Doctors on a 100 mm VAS-scale (Visual Analog Scale).
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Pain as Recorded by the Study Doctors on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS Scale)
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Pain Free Function Index of Everyday Activities
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Pain Free Function Index of Everyday Activities
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Pain Free Function Index of Everyday Activities
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Pain Free Function Index of Everyday Activities
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Affected Function on 100 mm VAS-scale as Recorded by the Study Doctors
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Pain-free Grip Strength Ratio
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Pain-free Grip Strength Ratio
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Pain-free Grip Strength Ratio
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Treatment Success - Event Rates in Each Group
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Affected Function on 100 mm VAS-scale as Recorded by the Study Doctors
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Affected Function on 100 mm VAS-scale as Recorded by the Study Doctors
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Affected Function on a 100 mm VAS-scale as Recorded by the Study Doctors
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Maximum Grip Strength Ratio
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Maximum Grip Strength Ratio
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Maximum Grip Strength Ratio
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Maximum Grip Strength Ratio
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]Pain-free Grip Strength Ratio
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]No Pain on Three Point Likert Scale on Dorsiflexion of Wrist
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]No Pain on Three Point Likert Scale on Dorsiflexion of Wrist
NCT00826462 (33) [back to overview]No Pain on Three Point Likert Scale on Dorsiflexion of Wrist
NCT00827073 (2) [back to overview]Change in Ln(Bacterial Colony Count) From Pre-antibiotic Administration to Post Study Medication Swabs
NCT00827073 (2) [back to overview]Number of Bacterial Species in Pre-antibiotic Administration and in Post Study Medication Swabs
NCT00840996 (7) [back to overview]Mean Pain Scores
NCT00840996 (7) [back to overview]Opioid Medication Requirement, mg in IV Morphine Equivalent
NCT00840996 (7) [back to overview]Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)
NCT00840996 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Hospitalization
NCT00840996 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Major 30-day Post Operative Complications
NCT00840996 (7) [back to overview]12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Physical Health Composite Score
NCT00840996 (7) [back to overview]12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Physical Health Composite Score
NCT00850889 (4) [back to overview]Investigator Assessment of Improvement Since Baseline in Nasolabial Fold (NLF) Severity
NCT00850889 (4) [back to overview]Procedural Pain Score
NCT00850889 (4) [back to overview]Subject Assessment of Improvement From Baseline in Nasolabial Fold (NLF) Severity
NCT00850889 (4) [back to overview]Comparative Pain
NCT00864682 (3) [back to overview]Verbal Pain Score
NCT00864682 (3) [back to overview]Complete Alleviation of Injection Pain
NCT00864682 (3) [back to overview]Satisfaction With Anesthetic Technique
NCT00883103 (1) [back to overview]Patient's Perception of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Visual Scale: 0 - no Pain; 5 - Worst Imaginable Pain
NCT00904618 (3) [back to overview]Safety of the Sling.
NCT00904618 (3) [back to overview]Local Anesthesia Satisfaction
NCT00904618 (3) [back to overview]Improvement in Stress Urinary Symptoms.
NCT00913003 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Post Operative Ileus
NCT00913003 (3) [back to overview]24 Hour Hydromorphone
NCT00913003 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Post Operative Nausea
NCT00913068 (1) [back to overview]Total Milligrams of Opiates
NCT00915473 (4) [back to overview]Mean Number of Days With Acute Medication Use
NCT00915473 (4) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With at Least 50% Reduction in the Frequency of Days With Moderate or Severe Migraine in the 4 Week Post Injection Compared to the 4 Week Pre-injection Baseline Period
NCT00915473 (4) [back to overview]Mean Frequency of Days With a Migraine
NCT00915473 (4) [back to overview]Mean Number of Hours With Moderate or Severe Migraine
NCT00925353 (1) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameters Based on Plasma Concentration of Lidocaine and MEGX in Nanograms/Milliliter.
NCT00929071 (2) [back to overview]Assessment of Immediate Post-injection Pain Severity by Investigator
NCT00929071 (2) [back to overview]Assessment of Immediate Post-injection Pain Severity by Subject
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants With a Decline of Greater Than or Equal to One Standard Deviation in One or More of Five Cognitive Domain Scores Reported as a Dichotomous Post-operative Cognitive Deficit (POCD) Outcome
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Transcerebral Activation Gradients of Monocytes
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Transcerebral Activation Gradient of Platelet-neutrophil Conjugates
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in the Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS-IADL)
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Social Activity
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Cognitive Function From Baseline
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Cognitive Function From Baseline Characterized as Continuous Cognitive Change
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Transcerebral Activation Gradients of Neutrophils
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI)
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI)
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the Western Perioperative Neurologic Scale (WPNS)
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the Western Perioperative Neurologic Scale (WPNS)
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Perceived Social Support
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Perceived Social Support
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Transcerebral Activation Gradients of Platelets
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in the Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS-IADL)
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Social Activity
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Symptom Limitations
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in Symptom Limitations
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in the Cognitive Difficulties Scale
NCT00938964 (29) [back to overview]Change in the Cognitive Difficulties Scale
NCT00953199 (2) [back to overview]Post ERCP Pancreatitis is the Primary Outcome.
NCT00953199 (2) [back to overview]Serum Amylase Levels
NCT00992108 (4) [back to overview]Clinical Response as Assessed by >20% Change From Baseline in the Pressure Pain Threshold
NCT00992108 (4) [back to overview]Clinical Response as Assessed by >20% Change From Baseline in the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS) Global Score
NCT00992108 (4) [back to overview]Clinical Response as Assessed by >20% Change From Baseline in Jaw Opening
NCT00992108 (4) [back to overview]Clinical Response as Assessed by >20% Change From Baseline in the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS) Global Score
NCT01012661 (2) [back to overview]Patients With Clinically Significant Reduction in Pain
NCT01012661 (2) [back to overview]Pain Score Using a 10-cm Visual Analog Pain Scale (1 = no Pain, 10 = Very Severe Pain)
NCT01069354 (10) [back to overview]Pain Score Using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain (0 = no Pain, 10 = Very Severe Pain)
NCT01069354 (10) [back to overview]Assess Subject Preference to Pain
NCT01069354 (10) [back to overview]Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 15 Minutes Post Injection
NCT01069354 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Reduction in Pain As Defined by a ≥ 2.0-cm Reduction in VAS
NCT01069354 (10) [back to overview]Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 60 Minutes Post Injection
NCT01069354 (10) [back to overview]Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 45 Minutes Post Injection
NCT01069354 (10) [back to overview]Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 4 Weeks Post Injection
NCT01069354 (10) [back to overview]Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 30 Minutes Post Injection
NCT01069354 (10) [back to overview]Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 2 Weeks Post Injection
NCT01069354 (10) [back to overview]Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 1 Week Post Injection
NCT01086150 (2) [back to overview]Pain Scores From Composite Visual Analog Scale
NCT01086150 (2) [back to overview]Keratinocyte Immunoreactivity of Nav1.6, Nav1.7, CGRP
NCT01087489 (3) [back to overview]Discomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal Injection
NCT01087489 (3) [back to overview]Presence and Severity of Keratopathy and the Size of Subconjunctival Hemorrhage
NCT01087489 (3) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure Change After Intravitreal Injection With Each Anesthetic Method, Results Reported in mmHg
NCT01114997 (7) [back to overview]Post Operative Pain
NCT01114997 (7) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction
NCT01114997 (7) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption Obtained From the Recorded Data
NCT01114997 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Postoperative Nausea One Day After Surgery
NCT01114997 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Post Operative Pain One Month After Surgery
NCT01114997 (7) [back to overview]Return to Normal Activities of Daily Living Using Follow up Questionnaires
NCT01114997 (7) [back to overview]Post-anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Stay
NCT01123889 (3) [back to overview]Pain and Disability of the Shoulder Through Validated Questionnaires
NCT01123889 (3) [back to overview]Pain and Disability of the Shoulder Through Validated Questionnaires
NCT01123889 (3) [back to overview]Pain and Disability of the Shoulder Through Validated Questionnaires
NCT01126359 (2) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale Pain Score
NCT01126359 (2) [back to overview]Break-through Narcotic Requirement
NCT01155167 (3) [back to overview]Radial Artery Spasm During Catheterization
NCT01155167 (3) [back to overview]Change in Radial Artery Diameter
NCT01155167 (3) [back to overview]Radial Artery Patency
NCT01180660 (2) [back to overview]Quality of Recovery 40 on the Day After Surgery
NCT01180660 (2) [back to overview]24 Hour Total Opioid Consumption
NCT01205048 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at Week 48 After Final Initial Injection
NCT01205048 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at Week 3 After the Final Initial Injection
NCT01205048 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at Week 24 After Final Initial Injection
NCT01205048 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at Week 12 After Final Initial Injection
NCT01205048 (9) [back to overview]Participant Pain Assessment After the Initial Injection
NCT01205048 (9) [back to overview]Participant Pain Assessment After the Initial Touch-up Injection
NCT01205048 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Participant Self-Assessment of Wrinkle Severity at Week 24 After Final Initial Injection
NCT01205048 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01205048 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Scale (WSRS) at Week 36 After Final Initial Injection
NCT01205061 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Participant Self-Assessment of Wrinkle Severity at Week 24 After Final Initial Injection
NCT01205061 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at Week 24 After Final Initial Injection
NCT01205061 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Score (WSRS) at Week 12 After Final Initial Injection
NCT01205061 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Score (WSRS) at Week 36 After Final Initial Injection
NCT01205061 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Score (WSRS) at Week 48 After Final Initial Injection
NCT01205061 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Event (AEs)
NCT01205061 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Score (WSRS) at Week 3 After Final Initial Injection
NCT01205061 (9) [back to overview]Participant Pain Assessment After the Initial Touch-up Injection
NCT01205061 (9) [back to overview]Participant Pain Assessment After the Initial Injection
NCT01207401 (1) [back to overview]Median Visual Analogue Score Measuring Pain
NCT01214161 (3) [back to overview]Pain During IUD Insertion at Various Time Points (See Description for Time Points)
NCT01214161 (3) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT01214161 (3) [back to overview]Provider's Assessment of Patient's Maximum Pain on a Visual Analogue Scale
NCT01224431 (2) [back to overview]Pain, Measured as Units on a Scale
NCT01224431 (2) [back to overview]Length of Cry
NCT01238536 (4) [back to overview]Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ)
NCT01238536 (4) [back to overview]Roland Morris
NCT01238536 (4) [back to overview]Pain Numeric Rating Scale
NCT01238536 (4) [back to overview]Leg Pain NRS
NCT01243112 (2) [back to overview]Onset of Action
NCT01243112 (2) [back to overview]Length of Action
NCT01250002 (2) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption (Morphine Equivalents)
NCT01250002 (2) [back to overview]Quality of Recovery 40 Score
NCT01250184 (6) [back to overview]Quality of Life SF-36
NCT01250184 (6) [back to overview]PHQ 9 Function Measured With the Hand Back and Hand Mouth Maneuvers. Complications and Adverse Reactions Need for Rescue Medication
NCT01250184 (6) [back to overview]Quality of Life SF-36
NCT01250184 (6) [back to overview]Visual Analogue Scale
NCT01250184 (6) [back to overview]PHQ 9 Function Measured With the Hand Back and Hand Mouth Maneuvers. Complications and Adverse Reactions Need for Rescue Medication
NCT01250184 (6) [back to overview]Visual Analogue Scale
NCT01265446 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Sore Throat Pain Intensity up to 240 mn Post-dose
NCT01265446 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Sore Throat Pain Intensity
NCT01284296 (1) [back to overview]Categorical Groups Based on Magnitude of Differences Between Noninvasive (SpHb) and Laboratory Co-Oximeter (tHb) Hemoglobin in Patients With a Finger Regional Anesthetic Block.
NCT01292447 (1) [back to overview]Mean Pain Score During IUD Insertion
NCT01302483 (5) [back to overview]Soft Tissue Anesthesia Duration
NCT01302483 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Change in Pulse From Baseline
NCT01302483 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Change in Pulse Oximetry From Baseline
NCT01302483 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline
NCT01302483 (5) [back to overview]Pulpal Anesthesia
NCT01304082 (4) [back to overview]Rank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until Anesthesia
NCT01304082 (4) [back to overview]Rank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until Hypoesthesia
NCT01304082 (4) [back to overview]Rank-transformed Pain Score
NCT01304082 (4) [back to overview]Rank-transformed Pain Score Upon Needle Stick.
NCT01311102 (4) [back to overview]Pain During Tenaculum Placement
NCT01311102 (4) [back to overview]Pain Measurement During Liquid Infusion/Sounding
NCT01311102 (4) [back to overview]Pain Scores During Overall IUD Placement
NCT01311102 (4) [back to overview]Pain During IUD Placement
NCT01330134 (3) [back to overview]Pain Assessment: During Procedure
NCT01330134 (3) [back to overview]Pain Assessment: Lidocaine Injection
NCT01330134 (3) [back to overview]Pain Assessment: Overall
NCT01330459 (5) [back to overview]Postoperative Nausea
NCT01330459 (5) [back to overview]Satisfaction With Pain Control
NCT01330459 (5) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Pain
NCT01330459 (5) [back to overview]Need for Additional Intraoperative and/or Postoperative Pain Medication
NCT01330459 (5) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Pain During Cervical Dilation
NCT01342510 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Pain Associated With Injection of Propofol.
NCT01342510 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Pain With Injection of Propofol
NCT01355588 (4) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Post-dose (AUC 0-t)
NCT01355588 (4) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC 0-∞)
NCT01355588 (4) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
NCT01355588 (4) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)
NCT01383200 (1) [back to overview]Participants Score on Pain Scale
NCT01384877 (10) [back to overview]Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, Have Any Practical Matters Resulting From Your Illness, Either Financial or Personal, Been Addressed?
NCT01384877 (10) [back to overview]Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, Have Other Symptoms e.g. Feeling Sick, Having a Cough or Constipation Been Affecting How You Feel?
NCT01384877 (10) [back to overview]Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, Have You Been Able to Share How You Are Feeling With Your Family or Friends?
NCT01384877 (10) [back to overview]Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, Have You Been Affected by Pain?
NCT01384877 (10) [back to overview]Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, Have You Been Feeling Anxious or Worried About Your Illness or Treatment?
NCT01384877 (10) [back to overview]Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, Have You Been Feeling Depressed?
NCT01384877 (10) [back to overview]Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, Have You Felt Good About Yourself as a Person?
NCT01384877 (10) [back to overview]Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, How Much Time do You Feel Has Been Wasted on Appointments Relating to Your Healthcare e.g. Waiting Around for Transport or Repeating Tests?
NCT01384877 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Reduction in Worst Pain Intensity or Reduction in 24hr Opioid Dose of at Least 30% Without Worsening of Pain Scores
NCT01384877 (10) [back to overview]Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, Have Any of Your Family or Friends Been Anxious or Worried About You?
NCT01394250 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R) at 30 Minutes After IV Cannulation
NCT01394250 (2) [back to overview]Comparison of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale (FLACC) Score Immediately After IV Cannulation Between Groups
NCT01401647 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Survive From the Time of Cardiac Arrest to Hospital Discharge
NCT01401647 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Scoring at or Below a 3 on the MRS Scale
NCT01402011 (7) [back to overview]Physical Examination of the Shoulder Scale
NCT01402011 (7) [back to overview]Visual Analog Pain Scale 0= no Pain 10 = Maximum Pain
NCT01402011 (7) [back to overview]Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire
NCT01402011 (7) [back to overview]Rotator Cuff Ultrasound, Ultrasound Shoulder Pathology Rating Scale
NCT01402011 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Maximum Pain Score at 9 Months
NCT01402011 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Visual Analog Pain Scale at 3 Months
NCT01402011 (7) [back to overview]Nine Month Satisfaction Questionnaire
NCT01402869 (3) [back to overview]Time to Peak Methemoglobin Blood Levels
NCT01402869 (3) [back to overview]Peak Methemoglobin Blood Levels
NCT01402869 (3) [back to overview]Delta Methemoglobin Blood Level
NCT01405768 (4) [back to overview]Injection Pain Score (Median)
NCT01405768 (4) [back to overview]Injection Pain Score (Mean)
NCT01405768 (4) [back to overview]Overall LEEP Procedure Pain Including Procedural Pain and Cramping (Median)
NCT01405768 (4) [back to overview]Overall LEEP Procedure Pain Including Procedural Pain and Cramping (Mean)
NCT01411995 (1) [back to overview]Pain Score Assessed Immediately Following IUD Insertion
NCT01421641 (3) [back to overview]Tenaculum Pain
NCT01421641 (3) [back to overview]Tenaculum Placement Satisfaction
NCT01421641 (3) [back to overview]Intervention Pain
NCT01431755 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Improved Subjects at 2 Weeks After Treatment as Assessed by Use of Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS)
NCT01431755 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Step Improvement on Medicis Midface Volume Scale (MMVS) at 2 Weeks
NCT01431755 (6) [back to overview]Subject Pain Assessment by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 15 and 120 Minutes After Treatment.
NCT01431755 (6) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Reporting Adverse Event
NCT01431755 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Who Assessed Treatment With Restylane SubQ Lidocaine as Least Painful.
NCT01431755 (6) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Reporting at Least 1 Diary Complaint Related to the Cheek Treated With Restylane SubQ and Restylane SubQ Lidocaine Respectively After Initial Treatment.
NCT01445847 (1) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Laryngospasm Postoperatively
NCT01466491 (2) [back to overview]Pain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time Points
NCT01466491 (2) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Pain
NCT01475253 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Voiding Frequency
NCT01475253 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Participant Reported Bladder Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 14
NCT01475253 (10) [back to overview]Change Form Baseline in O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICSI) Score
NCT01475253 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI) Score
NCT01475253 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Urinary Urgency as Assessed by VAS
NCT01475253 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Cystoscopic Examination Findings
NCT01475253 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders Using the Global Response Assessment (GRA)
NCT01475253 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Participant Reported Bladder Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 7
NCT01475253 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Participant Reported Bladder Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 42
NCT01475253 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Participant Reported Bladder Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ay Day 28
NCT01489891 (4) [back to overview]Likert Four Elements Scale to Evaluate the Satisfaction of Endoscopist
NCT01489891 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events in Both Groups
NCT01489891 (4) [back to overview]Rate of Administration of Propofol 1% Required to Obtain Uniform Sedation During Endoscopy
NCT01489891 (4) [back to overview]Likert Four Elements Scale to Evaluate the Satisfaction of Anaesthetist
NCT01496846 (2) [back to overview]Anesthetic Success Rate of an IANB With Articaine
NCT01496846 (2) [back to overview]Anesthetic Success Rate of Supplemental Infiltration Injection
NCT01508832 (1) [back to overview]The Change in the Average Finger Temperature From Baseline to Post-intervention.
NCT01515540 (1) [back to overview]"Pain Intensity on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The Scale Had Values From 0-100, Where 0 Represents no Pain and 100 Was the Worst Pain Imaginable."
NCT01516684 (5) [back to overview]Complications Including Any Change in Vital Signs That Requires Intervention by the Sedation Team, as Well as Post-LP Headache From Sedation With or Without EMLA Cream
NCT01516684 (5) [back to overview]Complications Including Any Change in Vital Signs That Requires Intervention by the Sedation Team, Post-LP Back Pain From Sedation With or Without EMLA Cream
NCT01516684 (5) [back to overview]Traumatic Lumbar Punctures After EMLA Cream or Placebo Cream Administration
NCT01516684 (5) [back to overview]Level of Movement (no Movement, Minor Movement, Major Movement, Other) After EMLA Cream or Placebo Cream Administration
NCT01516684 (5) [back to overview]Total Dose of Propofol Administered to Each Patient
NCT01534520 (4) [back to overview]Need for Pain Medication up to 7 Days
NCT01534520 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of IUDs Considered by Physicians Easy to Insert
NCT01534520 (4) [back to overview]To Evaluate Patient Experience of Self-inserting the Intravaginal Study Gel Prior to IUD
NCT01534520 (4) [back to overview]Change in Pain From Baseline to IUD Insertion
NCT01539317 (5) [back to overview]Location of Pain in Postmenopausal Dyspareunia
NCT01539317 (5) [back to overview]Prevention of Entry Dyspareunia With Non-hormonal Therapy
NCT01539317 (5) [back to overview]Improvement of Quality of Sexual Life - Visit 1
NCT01539317 (5) [back to overview]Improvement of Quality of Sexual Life - Visit 2
NCT01539317 (5) [back to overview]Improvement of Quality of Sexual Life - Visit 3
NCT01542125 (1) [back to overview]Pain
NCT01545557 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Investigators Satisfied With the Use of Study Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler
NCT01545557 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Satisfied or Very Satisfied at 3 Weeks After Last Injection
NCT01545557 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01545557 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Satisfied or Very Satisfied at 18 Months After Last Injection
NCT01545557 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Volume Loss Assessment
NCT01545765 (2) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT01545765 (2) [back to overview]Duration of Anesthesia(Minutes)
NCT01559064 (1) [back to overview]Subject Experience Measured by Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire
NCT01567605 (4) [back to overview]Duration of Bowel Care Routine
NCT01567605 (4) [back to overview]Cardiovascular Symptoms During Bowel Care
NCT01567605 (4) [back to overview]Heart Beat Abnormalities During Bowel Care (Number of Participants With Heart Beat Abnormalities)
NCT01567605 (4) [back to overview]Blood Pressure Change During Bowel Care
NCT01574807 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Pulpal Anesthesia Success.
NCT01579305 (1) [back to overview]Month 3 Overall Lip Fullness Scale Responder Rate Based on Independent Central Reviewer's Assessment
NCT01591616 (11) [back to overview]ECGs (QTcB Interval)
NCT01591616 (11) [back to overview]ECGs (QT Interval)
NCT01591616 (11) [back to overview]ECGs (QRS Duration)
NCT01591616 (11) [back to overview]ECGs (PR Interval)
NCT01591616 (11) [back to overview]Vital Signs (Systolic Pressure)
NCT01591616 (11) [back to overview]Vital Signs (Pulse)
NCT01591616 (11) [back to overview]Vital Signs (Diastolic Pressure)
NCT01591616 (11) [back to overview]Safety
NCT01591616 (11) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics
NCT01591616 (11) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics
NCT01591616 (11) [back to overview]ECGs (Ventricular Heart Rate)
NCT01602692 (7) [back to overview]Anti-emetic / Intraoperative Fentanyl Administered (Measured in Micrograms)
NCT01602692 (7) [back to overview]Amount of Post-Operative Narcotic Medication Administered
NCT01602692 (7) [back to overview]Anti-emetic / Intraoperative Medication Administered (mg)
NCT01602692 (7) [back to overview]Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting
NCT01602692 (7) [back to overview]Post-operative Pain
NCT01602692 (7) [back to overview]Time to Discharge
NCT01602692 (7) [back to overview]Unplanned Hospital Readmission
NCT01612156 (2) [back to overview]Pain During the Pelvic Floor Examination
NCT01612156 (2) [back to overview]Embarrassment With Pelvic Floor Examination
NCT01619852 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Chronic Persistent Pain 3 Months After Surgery as Determined by Character Severity (Yes/no).
NCT01619852 (5) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption
NCT01619852 (5) [back to overview]Postoperative Pain
NCT01619852 (5) [back to overview]Quality of Recovery
NCT01619852 (5) [back to overview]Post-surgical Persistent Pain Using Validated Questionnaires (S-LANNS Questionnaire, McGill Questionnaire, Brief Pain Inventory) to Assess Pain Qualities in Accordance With IMMPACT Recommendations.
NCT01622296 (1) [back to overview]Participant Pain Experience After Administration of Local Anesthesia to Numb the Gums and Teeth During Dental Treatment
NCT01628874 (5) [back to overview]Change in Heart Rate
NCT01628874 (5) [back to overview]Pain Score
NCT01628874 (5) [back to overview]Pain Score
NCT01628874 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Lumbar Puncture Success
NCT01628874 (5) [back to overview]Pain Score
NCT01640171 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participatns With Level 10 Pain on Wong-Baker Pain Scale In Subconjunctival Eye At Time of Intravitreal Injection
NCT01640171 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Preferred Subconjunctival Anesthetic at the Third Follow-up Visit
NCT01640171 (3) [back to overview]Likert Like Pain Scale Number of Participants Who Said the Topical Eye Hurt Much More Than the Subconjunctival Eye at Time of Intravitreal Injection
NCT01654302 (1) [back to overview]Index Knee Pain Scores on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
NCT01744197 (3) [back to overview]Global Assessment of Satisfaction With Venipuncture
NCT01744197 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With No Pain (VAS=0)
NCT01744197 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With No or Minor Pain (VAS<3)
NCT01759459 (3) [back to overview]Pain Score Following Peripheral Catheter Insertion
NCT01759459 (3) [back to overview]Pain Score Following Anesthetic Administration
NCT01759459 (3) [back to overview]Economic Analysis of Cost of Compounding Buffered Lidocaine Versus Cost of Purchasing Regular Lidocaine and/or Bacteriostatic Normal Saline
NCT01780324 (1) [back to overview]Pain Score on the Face, Legs, Arms, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale
NCT01807455 (5) [back to overview]Evaluation of Acne Scarring Using the Scale for Acne Scar Severity (SCAR-S)
NCT01807455 (5) [back to overview]Adverse Event Reporting During the Study
NCT01807455 (5) [back to overview]Assessment of Local Tolerability After Treatment
NCT01807455 (5) [back to overview]Evaluation of Acne Scarring and the Surrounding Skin Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale
NCT01807455 (5) [back to overview]Evaluation of Skin Quality and Overall Satisfaction Using a Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire
NCT01812044 (8) [back to overview]Peak Pain Score During First 30 Minutes
NCT01812044 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting
NCT01812044 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Required Anti-emetic Medication Post-operatively
NCT01812044 (8) [back to overview]Negative Postoperative Behavior Score on the PHBQ (Post Hospitalization Behavioral Questionnaire)
NCT01812044 (8) [back to overview]Peak Pain Score
NCT01812044 (8) [back to overview]Average Time to Discharge
NCT01812044 (8) [back to overview]Average Pain Score Over the First 30 Post-operative Minutes Using the CHEOPS Scale
NCT01812044 (8) [back to overview]Total Narcotic Use During Post-operative Recovery
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Subject Perception of Anxiety With Patient Positioning Procedure
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Subject Perception of Pain During Cervical Dilation
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Subject Vital Signs (Heart Rate)
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Subject Vital Signs (Heart Rate) 30 Minutes Postprocedure
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Subject Vital Signs (Oxygenation Saturation)
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Subject Vital Signs (Oxygenation Saturation) 30 Minutes Postprocedure
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Subject's Correct Identification of Receiving Midazolam or Placebo
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Need for Additional Postoperative Pain Medication
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction With Pain and Anxiety 30 Minutes Postoperatively
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Subject Satisfaction With Pain and Anxiety 1-3 Days Post Procedure
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Anxiety at Baseline
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Subject Anticipated Perception of Pain and Anxiety During Uterine Aspiration at Baseline
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Subject Extent of Amnesia Using Amnesia Score
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Subject Extent of Sedation
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Subject Perception of Pain and Anxiety During Uterine Aspiration
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Subject Perception of Pain and Anxiety Post Procedure
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Subject Perception of Pain and Anxiety Upon Entering Procedure Room
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Subject Sleepiness 30 Minutes Postprocedure
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Subject Extent of Amnesia
NCT01830881 (20) [back to overview]Subject Nausea 30 Minutes Postprocedure
NCT01868776 (2) [back to overview]Percent of Patients With Successful Anesthesia (% of Patients Able to Have Treatment Without Additional Anesthesia)
NCT01868776 (2) [back to overview]Effect of Buffered Lidocaine on the Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis.
NCT01890642 (5) [back to overview]Pain at J-tip Deployment
NCT01890642 (5) [back to overview]Pain Score
NCT01890642 (5) [back to overview]Fist Attempt Success
NCT01890642 (5) [back to overview]Change in Pain Score on FLACC Scale From Device Deployment to Venipuncture
NCT01890642 (5) [back to overview]Change in Pain Score From Baseline
NCT01929343 (6) [back to overview]Cue-induced Craving After Lidocaine/Saline Administration.
NCT01929343 (6) [back to overview]Physiological Responses as Measured by EMG (Electromyography) After Lidocaine/Saline Administration.
NCT01929343 (6) [back to overview]Physiological Responses as Measured by Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) After Lidocaine/Saline Administration.
NCT01929343 (6) [back to overview]Physiological Responses as Measured by Heart Rate After Lidocaine/Saline Administration.
NCT01929343 (6) [back to overview]Cocaine Craving
NCT01929343 (6) [back to overview]Cocaine Use
NCT01944098 (4) [back to overview]Postoperative Pain
NCT01944098 (4) [back to overview]Postoperative Pain
NCT01944098 (4) [back to overview]Postoperative Pain
NCT01944098 (4) [back to overview]Postoperative Pain
NCT01951820 (1) [back to overview]Measurement of Pain Associated With Injection, in Millimeters, According to Visual Analog Scale
NCT01968694 (4) [back to overview]Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
NCT01968694 (4) [back to overview]Change in Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2
NCT01968694 (4) [back to overview]Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): Pain on Average
NCT01968694 (4) [back to overview]Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
NCT01981772 (2) [back to overview]Pain Measurement as Assessed on a Heft-Parker 170 mm Visual Analog Scale
NCT01981772 (2) [back to overview]Postoperative Satisfaction on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale
NCT01983020 (1) [back to overview]Pain Intensity
NCT02000973 (4) [back to overview]Bispectral Index Score
NCT02000973 (4) [back to overview]Propofol Effect-site Concentration
NCT02000973 (4) [back to overview]Mean Arterial Pressure
NCT02000973 (4) [back to overview]Heart Rate
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pain Assessment Using McGill Pain Questionnaire
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Bruising Grading Scale Scores
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale Scores
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (PR-SMFRS)
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Subject Self Rating Scale (SSRS)
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Submental Fat Thickness
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS)
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Induration Grading Scale Scores
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Swelling Grading Scale Scores
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Patient Experience Questions
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Submental Skin Laxity Grades (SMSLG)
NCT02015195 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change in Erythema (Redness) in the Treated Human Arm (Not Placebo) From Baseline Determined by Measures (3) Taken Over 24 Hours
NCT02015195 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change in Pain in the Treated Human Arm (Not Placebo) From Baseline Determined by Measures (17) Taken Over 24 Hours
NCT02059902 (1) [back to overview]Narcotic Consumption (Measured in mg/kg Narcotic Consumption)
NCT02084706 (1) [back to overview]Difference in Visual-analog Score (VAS) for Anticipated Pain Prior to Injection and Actual Pain After Injection
NCT02090998 (1) [back to overview]Number of Daily Headaches
NCT02120261 (4) [back to overview]Pain Intensity
NCT02120261 (4) [back to overview]Pain Intensity
NCT02120261 (4) [back to overview]Pain Intensity
NCT02120261 (4) [back to overview]Duration of Pain Relief
NCT02135016 (5) [back to overview]The Block Level of Epidural Anesthesia
NCT02135016 (5) [back to overview]The Mean Blood Pressure
NCT02135016 (5) [back to overview]The Heart Rate
NCT02135016 (5) [back to overview]The Bispectral Index
NCT02135016 (5) [back to overview]The Effect-site Concentration of Propofol
NCT02148588 (6) [back to overview]Change in the Intensity of Brush Sensation
NCT02148588 (6) [back to overview]Change in the Intensity of Cold Sensation
NCT02148588 (6) [back to overview]Change in the Intensity of Pinprick Sensation
NCT02148588 (6) [back to overview]Change in the Intensity of Warm Sensation
NCT02148588 (6) [back to overview]Reduction in Spontaneous Pain Intensity After a Peripheral Nerve Block.
NCT02148588 (6) [back to overview]Reported Pain/Dysesthesia Descriptors on NPSI Questionnaire
NCT02158039 (2) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Complete or Partial Ablation of the Treated Cyst
NCT02158039 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
NCT02162680 (1) [back to overview]Differences in Patients' Perceptions of Pain Between Treatment Methods
NCT02164929 (8) [back to overview]Time to First Bowel Movement
NCT02164929 (8) [back to overview]Quality of Recovery
NCT02164929 (8) [back to overview]Postoperative Opioid Consumption
NCT02164929 (8) [back to overview]Pain Scores
NCT02164929 (8) [back to overview]Opioid Related Side Effects
NCT02164929 (8) [back to overview]Number of Epidural-related Side Effects
NCT02164929 (8) [back to overview]Length of Stay
NCT02164929 (8) [back to overview]Time to First Ingestion of Solid Food
NCT02176421 (6) [back to overview]Injector Ease of Use on an 11-Point Scale
NCT02176421 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Assessed by the Investigator as Very Well Improved or Well Improved on the 5-Point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
NCT02176421 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With a ≥1 Grade Improvement From Baseline in Infra-Orbital Area on the Allergan Infra-Orbital Rating Scale (AIRS) on the Right and Left Side
NCT02176421 (6) [back to overview]Subject Overall Eye Appearance Total Score on the 5-Point Periorbital Aesthetic Appearance Questionnaire (PAAQ)
NCT02176421 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Assessed by the Subjects as Very Well Improved or Well Improved on the 5-Point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
NCT02176421 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With a ≥1 Grade Improvement From Baseline in Infra-Orbital Area on the AIRS on the Right and Left Side
NCT02209272 (3) [back to overview]VAS for Pain Score During Local Anesthesia Infiltration
NCT02209272 (3) [back to overview]VAS for Pain Score During Subsequent Hip Joint Injection (Local Anesthetic Efficacy)
NCT02209272 (3) [back to overview]Anesthetic Infiltration Duration
NCT02218203 (1) [back to overview]Percent Change in Peak Pain Intensity
NCT02219321 (2) [back to overview]Intensity of Pain
NCT02219321 (2) [back to overview]Withdrawal Time (Seconds)
NCT02226159 (13) [back to overview]Avoidance of Neck Surgery
NCT02226159 (13) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction
NCT02226159 (13) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction
NCT02226159 (13) [back to overview]Numeric Pain Score
NCT02226159 (13) [back to overview]Numeric Pain Score
NCT02226159 (13) [back to overview]Disability
NCT02226159 (13) [back to overview]Numeric Pain Scre
NCT02226159 (13) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction
NCT02226159 (13) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction
NCT02226159 (13) [back to overview]Disability
NCT02226159 (13) [back to overview]Disability
NCT02226159 (13) [back to overview]Disability
NCT02226159 (13) [back to overview]Numeric Pain Score
NCT02229539 (1) [back to overview]Mean Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Pain Reduction
NCT02240628 (2) [back to overview]Pain Intensity
NCT02240628 (2) [back to overview]Number of Children in Each Group Who Don't Feel Pain or Have Mild Pain on Propofol Injection.
NCT02270255 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Serious Adverse Reactions From Superior Hypogastric Nerve Block
NCT02270255 (2) [back to overview]mg Equivalent Morphine Used Until Discharge From Recovery Room to Control Pain Level Below 4/10 (VAS)
NCT02285634 (4) [back to overview]Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT02285634 (4) [back to overview]Change in Heart Rate
NCT02285634 (4) [back to overview]Change in Mean Arterial Blood Pressure
NCT02285634 (4) [back to overview]Change in Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT02288364 (4) [back to overview]Pain
NCT02288364 (4) [back to overview]Pain
NCT02288364 (4) [back to overview]Pain
NCT02288364 (4) [back to overview]Pain
NCT02308748 (2) [back to overview]Change in Placebo Corrected Change From Baseline QTc Interval on the ECG Measured in Milliseconds When Moxifloxacin is Administered With Diltiazem at the Evening Dose Compared to When Moxifloxacin is Administered Alone at Afternoon Dose on Treatment Day.
NCT02308748 (2) [back to overview]Change in Placebo Corrected Change From Baseline QTc and J-Tpeakc Intervals on the ECG Measured in Milliseconds When Dofetilide is Administered With Mexiletine or Lidocaine Compared to When Dofetilide is Administered Alone at Evening Dose on Treatment Day
NCT02314546 (7) [back to overview]Parental Observed Behavioral Distress Score
NCT02314546 (7) [back to overview]Verbal Complaint
NCT02314546 (7) [back to overview]Sedation Scale Score
NCT02314546 (7) [back to overview]Time From Administration to Discharge
NCT02314546 (7) [back to overview]Sedation Scale Score
NCT02314546 (7) [back to overview]RN Observed Behavioral Distress Score
NCT02314546 (7) [back to overview]Verbal Complaints
NCT02356705 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Nosebleeds From Time of Drug Administration to Discharge Home
NCT02356705 (4) [back to overview]Observational Distress Score 5 Min (Blinded Study Nurse Assessmnet)
NCT02356705 (4) [back to overview]Observational Distress Score at 1 Minute (Blinded Study Nurse Assessment)
NCT02356705 (4) [back to overview]Time to Discharge
NCT02363803 (5) [back to overview]NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory) Descriptors of Pain at Baseline and 60 Min After Infusion
NCT02363803 (5) [back to overview]Evoked Mechanical and Thermal Sensation at Baseline and 60 Minutes After Infusion Initiation.
NCT02363803 (5) [back to overview]Change in Spontaneous Pain Intensity as a Function of Baseline MPT
NCT02363803 (5) [back to overview]Change in Spontaneous Pain Intensity as a Function of Baseline HPT
NCT02363803 (5) [back to overview]Change in Spontaneous Pain at 60-120 Minutes After Lidocaine Infusion Initiated (Assessed on 0-10 NRS)
NCT02379221 (6) [back to overview]Participants Anesthetic Preference
NCT02379221 (6) [back to overview]Mean Pain Level Associated With the Local Anesthetic Injection
NCT02379221 (6) [back to overview]Mean Pain Level Associated With the Local Topical Anesthetic
NCT02379221 (6) [back to overview]Mean Pain Level Associated With Facial Filler Injection to the Lower Lip
NCT02379221 (6) [back to overview]Mean Pain Level Associated With Facial Filler Injection at the Upper Lip
NCT02379221 (6) [back to overview]Mean Pain Level Associated With Facial Filler Injection to the Nasolabial Fold
NCT02380742 (4) [back to overview]VAS Score at the Time of Pessary Removal Adjusting for Baseline Pain and Patient Age
NCT02380742 (4) [back to overview]VAS Score at the Time of Pessary Removal Adjusting for Pessary Type and Investigator Training
NCT02380742 (4) [back to overview]VAS Score at the Time of Pessary Insertion Adjusting for Baseline Pain
NCT02380742 (4) [back to overview]VAS Score at the Time of Pessary Removal Adjusting for Baseline Pain
NCT02396537 (1) [back to overview]Discomfort With Intranasal Midazolam Administration
NCT02403986 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Improved Participants on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)-Subject
NCT02403986 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Improved Participants on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)-Investigator
NCT02420041 (10) [back to overview]Satisfaction of Procedure as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability Using a Numerical Scale 1-5
NCT02420041 (10) [back to overview]Satisfaction of Procedure as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability Using a Numerical Scale 1-5
NCT02420041 (10) [back to overview]Impression of Change of Condition at 3 Months Post-procedure Using the PGIC Scale
NCT02420041 (10) [back to overview]Change in Pain Score From Baseline to 2 Weeks Post-procedure Using the DoD/VA PRS
NCT02420041 (10) [back to overview]Impression of Change of Condition at 2 Weeks Post-procedure Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale
NCT02420041 (10) [back to overview]Change in Pain Score From Baseline to 3 Months Post-procedure Using the DoD/VA PRS
NCT02420041 (10) [back to overview]Change in Pain Score From Baseline to 30 Minutes Pre-procedure Using the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DoD/VA PRS) 0-10
NCT02420041 (10) [back to overview]Change in Pain Score Since Sacroiliac (SI) Injection at 2 Weeks Post-procedure Using the DoD/VA PRS
NCT02420041 (10) [back to overview]Change in Pain Score Since SI Injection at 3 Months Post-procedure Using the DoD/VA PRS
NCT02420041 (10) [back to overview]Difference in Minutes Between a Sacroiliac Joint Injection Done With Ultrasound vs Fluoroscopy
NCT02421419 (4) [back to overview]Degree of Triggering
NCT02421419 (4) [back to overview]VAS
NCT02421419 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Effects
NCT02421419 (4) [back to overview]Presence of Triggering
NCT02447029 (7) [back to overview]Overall Satisfaction With Procedure as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale
NCT02447029 (7) [back to overview]Overall Complication Rate as Measured by a Count of Participants in Each Group
NCT02447029 (7) [back to overview]Difference in Pain Level at Time of Cervical Dilation as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale
NCT02447029 (7) [back to overview]Pain With Speculum Insertion as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale
NCT02447029 (7) [back to overview]Pain With Tenaculum Placement as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale
NCT02447029 (7) [back to overview]Pain 30-45 Minutes After Procedure as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale
NCT02447029 (7) [back to overview]Pain Level Prior to Procedure (Anticipated Pain) as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale
NCT02454296 (3) [back to overview]Pain After Placement of Laminaria (100 mm Visual Analog Scale)
NCT02454296 (3) [back to overview]Paracervical or Sham Block Pain
NCT02454296 (3) [back to overview]Satisfaction With Overall Pain Control (100 mm Visual Analog Scale)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]Clinical Duration
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]Final Recovery Index
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]MAP - M7f (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 7f)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]HR - M1 (Heart Rate in the Moment 1)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]HR - M3 (Heart Rate in the Moment 3)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]HR - M4 (Heart Rate in the Moment 4)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]HR - M5 (Heart Rate in the Moment 5)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]MAP - M1 (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 1)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]Latency
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]HR - M6 (Heart Rate in the Moment 6)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]HR - M7a (Heart Rate in the Moment 7a)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]Recovery Index
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]MAP - M4 (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 4)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]HR - M7c (Heart Rate in the Moment 7c)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]HR - M7f (Heart Rate in the Moment 7f)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]Spontaneous Recovery (T4/T1=90%)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]Total Duration (Dur95%)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]MAP - M7e (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 7e)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]MAP - M7d (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 7d)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]MAP - M7c (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 7c)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]HR - M7b (Heart Rate in the Moment 7b)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]MAP - M7a (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 7a)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]MAP - M6 (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 6)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]HR - M2 (Heart Rate in the Moment 2)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]HR - M7e (Heart Rate in the Moment 7e)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]MAP - M3 (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 3)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]HR - M7d (Heart Rate in the Moment 7d)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]MAP - M2 (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 2)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]MAP - M5 (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 5)
NCT02483611 (30) [back to overview]MAP - M7b (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 7b)
NCT02512783 (1) [back to overview]Change in FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) Score
NCT02517996 (4) [back to overview]Change in Pelvic Urgency, Pain, and Frequency (PUF) Questionnaire With Preemptive Pudendal Nerve Block Compared to Saline
NCT02517996 (4) [back to overview]Change in IC Symptom Index Questionnaire With Preemptive Pudendal Nerve Block Compared to Saline
NCT02517996 (4) [back to overview]Change in Pain Level as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
NCT02517996 (4) [back to overview]Change in Problem Index (O'Leary Sant) With Preemptive Pudendal Nerve Block Compared to Saline
NCT02537951 (1) [back to overview]AFI-intensity After Nociceptive Stimulation
NCT02574832 (1) [back to overview]Time to T 10 Level
NCT02592629 (1) [back to overview]Change in Pain Assessment
NCT02616523 (3) [back to overview]Consumption of Piritramide
NCT02616523 (3) [back to overview]Consumption of Fentanyl
NCT02616523 (3) [back to overview]Neuropathic Pain (Pain Questionnaire) dn4
NCT02620683 (3) [back to overview]Lidocaine Blood Levels 30 Minutes Post Injection
NCT02620683 (3) [back to overview]Number of Minutes to Anesthesia Symptoms of Lower Lip
NCT02620683 (3) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Scores
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Pain With Coughing
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Overall Pain
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Pain With Coughing
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Quality of Recovery
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Pain at Rest
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Total Opioid Consumption
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Length of Time to First Bowel Movement
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Overall Pain
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Overall Pain
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Overall Pain
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Overall Pain in Postoperative Period
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Pain at Rest
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Pain at Rest
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Pain at Rest
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Length of Time to First Flatus
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Pain at Rest
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Pain With Coughing
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Pain With Coughing
NCT02623803 (20) [back to overview]Pain With Coughing
NCT02669407 (13) [back to overview]Left Ventricular Diameter
NCT02669407 (13) [back to overview]Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
NCT02669407 (13) [back to overview]Change in Creatinine Level
NCT02669407 (13) [back to overview]Change in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)
NCT02669407 (13) [back to overview]Central Venous Pressure
NCT02669407 (13) [back to overview]Cardiac Index
NCT02669407 (13) [back to overview]Change in Clinical Symptoms, as Measured by 6 Minute Walk Test
NCT02669407 (13) [back to overview]Urine Output Measured in ml Over 3 Hours
NCT02669407 (13) [back to overview]Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure
NCT02669407 (13) [back to overview]Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure
NCT02669407 (13) [back to overview]Pulmonary Arterial Mean Pressure
NCT02669407 (13) [back to overview]N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Level
NCT02669407 (13) [back to overview]Dyspnea as Measured on Likert Scale
NCT02683707 (4) [back to overview]Patient Self-reported Pain
NCT02683707 (4) [back to overview]Platelet Reactivity Using Light Transmission Aggregometry
NCT02683707 (4) [back to overview]Single Time-point Platelet Reactivity Using Verify Now
NCT02683707 (4) [back to overview]Ticagrelor Pharmacokinetics
NCT02703948 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events With the Use of Restylane Silk With Lidocaine
NCT02708433 (2) [back to overview]Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Mandibular Molar Anesthesia
NCT02708433 (2) [back to overview]Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Mandibular Canine Anesthesia
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Intravenous Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 60 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Intravenous Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 65 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Postoperative Rise in Creatinine Levels
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Time to Discharge Readiness at the Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Timing of Cardiovascular Drugs for MAP < 50 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Timing of Cardiovascular Drugs for MAP < 55 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Timing of Cardiovascular Drugs for MAP < 60 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Timing of Cardiovascular Drugs for MAP < 65 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Ephedrine
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Ephinephrine
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Glycopyrrolate
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Phenylephrine
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Inhaled Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 50 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Inhaled Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 55 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Inhaled Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 65 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Inhaled Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 60 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]30-day Mortality
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Ephedrine
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Norepinephrine
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Epinephrine
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Glycopyrrolate
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Norepinephrine
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Phenylephrine
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 50 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 55 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 60 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 65 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 70 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 75 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Estimated Intraoperative Blood Loss
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]In-hospital Mortality
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 50 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 50 mmHg for > 10 Minutes
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 50 mmHg for > 20 Minutes
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 55 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 55 mmHg for > 10 Minutes
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 55 mmHg for > 20 Minutes
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 60 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 60 mmHg for > 10 Minutes
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 60 mmHg for > 20 Minutes
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Intraoperative Administration of Intravenous Fluids
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Intravenous Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 50 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Intravenous Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 55 mmHg
NCT02738203 (5) [back to overview](IUD Insertion): Pain Perceived by Visual Analogue Scale (0-100 mm) Immediately Following Procedure Completion
NCT02738203 (5) [back to overview]Anticipated Pain as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale
NCT02738203 (5) [back to overview]Baseline Pain as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale
NCT02738203 (5) [back to overview]Pain After Speculum Placement as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale
NCT02738203 (5) [back to overview]Pain After Tenaculum Placement as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale
NCT02741713 (5) [back to overview]Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scores (0-10) at Rest
NCT02741713 (5) [back to overview]Post-operative Axillary Pain
NCT02741713 (5) [back to overview]Time From Block Placement to Onset of Axillary Pain
NCT02741713 (5) [back to overview]Total Opioid Usage
NCT02741713 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Episodes of Nausea or Vomiting
NCT02747186 (2) [back to overview]Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Maxillary Molar Anesthesia
NCT02747186 (2) [back to overview]Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Maxillary Canine Anesthesia
NCT02769247 (5) [back to overview]Pain Control With IUD Insertion
NCT02769247 (5) [back to overview]Paragard vs Mirena IUD
NCT02769247 (5) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction With IUD
NCT02769247 (5) [back to overview]Perceived Pain 30 Days Post Insertion
NCT02769247 (5) [back to overview]Physician Perceived Pain Control During IUD Insertion
NCT02818894 (9) [back to overview]Transient Neurological Symptoms Score on Post-Operative Day 7
NCT02818894 (9) [back to overview]Transient Neurological Symptoms Score on Post-Operative Day 14
NCT02818894 (9) [back to overview]Time to Ambulation After Recovery From Spinal Anesthesia
NCT02818894 (9) [back to overview]Post-Operative Transient Neurological Symptoms Score on Day 1 Post-Operation
NCT02818894 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Transient Neurological Symptoms on Post-Operative Day 7
NCT02818894 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Transient Neurological Symptoms on Post-Operative Day 14
NCT02818894 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Transient Neurological Symptoms (TNS) on Day 1 Post-Operation
NCT02818894 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Voiding Without Complications After Recovery From Spinal Anesthesia
NCT02818894 (9) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Hypotension
NCT02823431 (4) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale Scores (Measure of Discomfort) After Catheterization
NCT02823431 (4) [back to overview]Voiding Efficiency
NCT02823431 (4) [back to overview]Detrusor Pressure at Maximum Flow
NCT02823431 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Interrupted Urinary Flow Pattern During Micturition
NCT02832115 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Procedural Failure
NCT02832115 (5) [back to overview]Change in Radial Artery Dimension Measured in mm^2.
NCT02832115 (5) [back to overview]Radial Artery Spasm
NCT02832115 (5) [back to overview]Patient Discomfort or Pain During Procedure (Visual Analog Scale 0-10)
NCT02832115 (5) [back to overview]Radial Pulse at End of Procedure
NCT02849678 (7) [back to overview]Hospital Length of Stay.
NCT02849678 (7) [back to overview]Time to First Flatus/Defecation
NCT02849678 (7) [back to overview]Consumption of Nerve Block Boluses Will Also be Recorded Daily
NCT02849678 (7) [back to overview]Time to First Ambulation(Walking Greater Than 15 Feet)
NCT02849678 (7) [back to overview]11-point Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Assessment
NCT02849678 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Complications (Including But Not Limited to Pneumonia, Atelectasis, Hypotension, Motor Weakness, Etc.)
NCT02849678 (7) [back to overview]Postoperative Opioid Consumption (Milligrams of Dilaudid or Equivalent)
NCT02852434 (5) [back to overview]Anticipated Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale
NCT02852434 (5) [back to overview]Overall Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale
NCT02852434 (5) [back to overview]Speculum Placement Measured by Visual Analogue Scale
NCT02852434 (5) [back to overview]Pain Perceived at the Time of Laminaria or Osmotic Dilator Insertion
NCT02852434 (5) [back to overview]Baseline Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale
NCT02872012 (1) [back to overview]Subjective Injection Pain
NCT02902770 (1) [back to overview]Pain Score at 30 Minutes
NCT02904096 (8) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Any Improvement on Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) From Baseline in Both Hands at Month 3 After Initial Treatment
NCT02904096 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Range of Motion (ROM) Flexion and Extension (Angle) for Metacarpophalangeal Joints in Each Hand at Month 24
NCT02904096 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects With Device-and/Injection-related Severe TEAEs in the Grade 4 Hands Group Versus the Grade 2-3 Hands Group at Month 24
NCT02904096 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sensation to Filament Size Between Metacarpals in Each Hand at Month 24
NCT02904096 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grip Strength, Tip Pinch Strength, Key Pinch Strength, and Palmar Strength in Each Hand at Month 24
NCT02904096 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Functional Dexterity in Each Hand at Month 24
NCT02904096 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects With Device-and/or Injection-related Severe Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in the Grade 4 Hands Group Versus the Grade 2-3 Hands Group at Month 6
NCT02904096 (8) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With MHGS Scores Greater Than or Equal (>=) to 1-point Improvement From Baseline in Both Hands at Month 3 After Initial Treatment
NCT02904915 (3) [back to overview]Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale
NCT02904915 (3) [back to overview]Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale
NCT02904915 (3) [back to overview]Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
NCT02909140 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients in Each Arm That Required Use of an Iris Expansion Device During the Procedure
NCT02909140 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients in Each Arm That Required Another Mydriatic Agent
NCT02909140 (9) [back to overview]Cumulative Energy Dispersed for Each Arm
NCT02909140 (9) [back to overview]Mean Time Taken to Perform Phacoemulsification
NCT02909140 (9) [back to overview]Pupil Size Immediately Prior to Capsulorrhexis
NCT02909140 (9) [back to overview]Pupil Size (mm) Immediately After Nuclear Disassembly
NCT02909140 (9) [back to overview]Pupil Size Immediately Prior to Intraocular Lens (IOL) Insertion
NCT02909140 (9) [back to overview]Pupil Size Upon Completion of Surgery
NCT02909140 (9) [back to overview]Mean Time Taken to Perform Phacoemulsification in Each Arm
NCT02912195 (15) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction
NCT02912195 (15) [back to overview]Pain Score (NRS 0-10)
NCT02912195 (15) [back to overview]Pain Score (NRS 0-10)
NCT02912195 (15) [back to overview]Pain Score (NRS 0-10)
NCT02912195 (15) [back to overview]Pain Score (NRS 0-10)
NCT02912195 (15) [back to overview]Pain Score (NRS 0-10)
NCT02912195 (15) [back to overview]Pain Relief at 60 Minutes Compared to Baseline.
NCT02912195 (15) [back to overview]Pain Relief at 50 Minutes Compared to Baseline.
NCT02912195 (15) [back to overview]Pain Score (NRS 0-10)
NCT02912195 (15) [back to overview]Pain Relief at 40 Minutes Compared to Baseline.
NCT02912195 (15) [back to overview]Pain Relief at 30 Minutes Compared to Baseline.
NCT02912195 (15) [back to overview]Pain Relief at 20 Minutes Compared to Baseline.
NCT02912195 (15) [back to overview]Pain Relief at 10 Minutes Compared to Baseline.
NCT02912195 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants Requiring Rescue Medications
NCT02912195 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events
NCT02918721 (2) [back to overview]Treatment Differences in Pain (Restylane Side - Restylane Lidocaine Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
NCT02918721 (2) [back to overview]Treatment Difference in Pain (Restylane Lidocaine Side - Restylane Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)
NCT02949921 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With X-ray of Either Hand With Bone Obscuration at Month 24
NCT02949921 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With X-ray of Either Hand With Bone Obscuration at Month 1
NCT02949921 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting One or More Device or Injection-related Severe Adverse Events (AEs) at Months 1 and 6
NCT02949921 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With GAIS Scores Following Retreatment at Months 7 and 12
NCT02949921 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Scores After Initial Treatment at Months 1 and 6
NCT02949921 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 1 Point Improvement on the MHGS in Both Hands After Initial Treatment at Months 1 and 6
NCT02949921 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With >=1 Point Improvement on the MHGS in Both Hands Following Retreatment at Months 7 and 12
NCT02949921 (9) [back to overview]Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) Scores
NCT02949921 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With X-ray of Either Hand With Bone Obscuration at Month 6
NCT02980783 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Roughness (Ra) of the Radial Cheek Lines at Maximum Smile as Assessed by DERMATOP®
NCT02980783 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants by Self-Perceived Age Category as Assessed by the Self-Perception of Age (SPA) Questionnaire
NCT02980783 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants by Improvement Rating (Response) of the Participants' Dynamic Radial Cheek Lines as Assessed by the Investigator Using the GAIS
NCT02980783 (7) [back to overview]Mean Score for the Level of Naturalness of the Appearance of Participants' Dynamic Radial Cheek Lines as Assessed by a Participant Questionnaire
NCT02980783 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Texture (Rz) of the Radial Cheek Lines at Maximum Smile as Assessed by DERMATOP®
NCT02980783 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants by Improvement Rating (Improved and Not Improved) of Their Dynamic Radial Cheek Lines as Assessed by the Participant Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
NCT02980783 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Amplitude (Rt) of the Radial Cheek Lines at Maximum Smile as Assessed by DERMATOP®
NCT02988050 (1) [back to overview]Patients Satisfaction
NCT02991040 (6) [back to overview]Patient Global Aesthetic Improvement
NCT02991040 (6) [back to overview]Wrinkle Severity Rating Score (WSRS)
NCT02991040 (6) [back to overview]Pain Measured by Subject on 100 mm VAS Scale at 15, 30, 45, and 60 Minutes Post Injection and at 2 Weeks Post Injection
NCT02991040 (6) [back to overview]Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement
NCT02991040 (6) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability of Revanesse Ultra and Revanesse Ultra+ Injection by Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
NCT02991040 (6) [back to overview]Pain at Injection as Measured by Subject on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scale at Time 0 Minutes Post Injection
NCT03028012 (3) [back to overview]Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Modified
NCT03028012 (3) [back to overview]Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRS) at Baseline and Three Months.
NCT03028012 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Responder Rate Greater Than 50% on the Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRS) Improvement
NCT03054844 (6) [back to overview]Provider Satisfaction
NCT03054844 (6) [back to overview]Procedural Pain
NCT03054844 (6) [back to overview]Procedural Distress, OSBD-R
NCT03054844 (6) [back to overview]Procedural Distress, Cry Duration
NCT03054844 (6) [back to overview]Parental Satisfaction
NCT03054844 (6) [back to overview]Procedural Distress, FLACC
NCT03057704 (3) [back to overview]Investigators Rating of Patient Discomfort
NCT03057704 (3) [back to overview]Subject's Recall of Injection Discomfort
NCT03057704 (3) [back to overview]Patient Expression of Pain
NCT03086213 (6) [back to overview]Comparing the Blood Gas Analysis After the Intervention of the Each Group
NCT03086213 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Puncture Related Complications
NCT03086213 (6) [back to overview]Concentration of Cortisol at Different Point During the Operation
NCT03086213 (6) [back to overview]Comparing the Inflammatory Markers During the Operation After the Intervention of the Each Group
NCT03086213 (6) [back to overview]Comparing the Hemodynamics of the Intervention of the Each Group During the Operation
NCT03086213 (6) [back to overview]Comparing the Hemodynamics of the Intervention of the Each Group During the Operation
NCT03087604 (2) [back to overview]Time Required to Place the Epidural Catheter
NCT03087604 (2) [back to overview]Success Rate of Placement of a Thoracic Epidural
NCT03096444 (3) [back to overview]Mechanical Thresholds (Mechanical Detection and Pain).
NCT03096444 (3) [back to overview]Thermal Threshold Detection (Warmth and Heat Pain)
NCT03096444 (3) [back to overview]Peak Itch Intensity Between the Vehicle and Active Treatments (Individual and KeAmLi-combo).
NCT03097783 (1) [back to overview]Percent Responders With 1 Point Improvement on the Medicis Midface Volume Scale
NCT03102710 (3) [back to overview]Gracely Sensory Scale Pain Rating Changes in Response to Lidocaine and Capsaicin Creams and tDCS
NCT03102710 (3) [back to overview]fMRI Resting States Functional Connectivity Changes During Pain Stimulation
NCT03102710 (3) [back to overview]Comparison of Functional Connectivity Changes of the DLPFC Before and After tDCS Stimulation
NCT03103100 (4) [back to overview]Degree of Motor Block
NCT03103100 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Achieve Adequate Analgesia
NCT03103100 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Experienced of Maternal Hypotension
NCT03103100 (4) [back to overview]Time to Achieve an Adequate Epidural Level for Labor Analgesia
NCT03107754 (2) [back to overview]Pain After Speculum Placement, Cervical Dilation, and Aspiration
NCT03107754 (2) [back to overview]Injection Pain
NCT03119181 (1) [back to overview]Subject-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score Following Tympanic Membrane Tap for Subjects Treated With Active Tymbion Iontophoresis Compared to VAS Score for Subjects Treated With Sham Tymbion Iontophoresis.
NCT03120351 (1) [back to overview]Pain Disability Index Score (PDI) at Six Months Following Surgical Procedure
NCT03127137 (1) [back to overview]Change in Strength in Both Groups After CESI.
NCT03127384 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Improved on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
NCT03127384 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Lower Scar Severity in the Treated Cheek Compared to the Untreated Cheek
NCT03127943 (2) [back to overview]Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Mandibular Molar Anesthesia
NCT03127943 (2) [back to overview]Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Mandibular Canine Anesthesia
NCT03145207 (1) [back to overview]Measurement of Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax)
NCT03160716 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants That Responded to Treatment
NCT03160716 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Aesthetic Improvement
NCT03160716 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety]
NCT03160716 (4) [back to overview]Subject Satisfaction
NCT03174132 (2) [back to overview]Treatment Differences in Pain (Restylane Perlane Side - Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
NCT03174132 (2) [back to overview]Treatment Differences in Pain (Restylane Perlane Side - Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
NCT03254394 (4) [back to overview]CIPN Score on EORTC QLQ-CIPN20
NCT03254394 (4) [back to overview]Changes in NPSI Score.
NCT03254394 (4) [back to overview]The Cumulative Dose of Oxaliplatin
NCT03254394 (4) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Intensity of Oxaliplatin-induced Cold Pain/Unpleasantness vs Time
NCT03300674 (3) [back to overview]Rescue Medication
NCT03300674 (3) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT03300674 (3) [back to overview]Change in 0-10 Pain Scale Between Baseline and 90 Minutes
NCT03310970 (6) [back to overview]Residual Drug Analysis in Worn TDDS and Patches
NCT03310970 (6) [back to overview]Measurement of Time of Maximum Serum Lidocaine Concentration (Tmax).
NCT03310970 (6) [back to overview]Measurement of Maximum Serum Concentration of Lidocaine (Cmax)
NCT03310970 (6) [back to overview]Measurement of Elimination Rate Constant of Lidocaine (Kel)
NCT03310970 (6) [back to overview]Determination of Area Under the Serum-concentration-time Curve (AUC)
NCT03310970 (6) [back to overview]Measurement of Volume of Lidocaine Distribution (V)
NCT03319719 (6) [back to overview]Mean Pain Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
NCT03319719 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Incidence of Any Common Treatment Site Response (CTR) Evaluated Using Participant Diaries
NCT03319719 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 1-point Improvement as Evaluated Using Merz NLF Scale at Week 6
NCT03319719 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Incidence of Any CTR by Duration Evaluated Using Participant Diaries
NCT03319719 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Incidence of Any CTR by Severity Evaluated Using Participant Diaries
NCT03319719 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT03343080 (3) [back to overview]Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score (RASS)
NCT03343080 (3) [back to overview]Total Duration of Mechanical Ventilation
NCT03343080 (3) [back to overview]Total Sedation Requirements
NCT03382821 (4) [back to overview]"The Percentage of Participants Reporting Patient Global Impression of Change Score of 6-7 (Indicating Much Improved and Very Much Improved)"
NCT03382821 (4) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants With Reduction of 50% or More of Neck and Arm Pain NRS Score
NCT03382821 (4) [back to overview]Neck Disability Index-5
NCT03382821 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting >6.8 Reduction on the Medication Quantification Scale III
NCT03414359 (2) [back to overview]Secondary Outcome: Number of Participants With Requirement for Intraoperative Analgesia Supplementation
NCT03414359 (2) [back to overview]The Onset Time to Surgical Anesthesia
NCT03425253 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Final Study Visit for Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS)
NCT03425253 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Final Study Visit in the FACE-Q™ Appraisal of Neck
NCT03425253 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Showed ≥ 1-point Jawline Improvement From Baseline on the Allergan Loss of Jawline Definition Scale (ALJDS), as Assessed by the Investigator
NCT03425253 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Final Study Visit for Submental Skin Laxity Grade (SMSLG) Score
NCT03425253 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Final Study Visit in the FACE-Q™ Satisfaction With Lower Face and Jawline Score
NCT03425253 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Final Study Visit for Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (PR-SMFRS)
NCT03425253 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Final Study Visit for FACE-Q™ Appraisal of Area Under Chin
NCT03425253 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Last BELKYRA® Treatment on the ALJDS
NCT03425253 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Final Study Visit in Jawline Definition, Based on Independent Reviewer Assessment Using the ALJDS and Photographic Images
NCT03430531 (9) [back to overview]Pain Score at Baseline
NCT03430531 (9) [back to overview]Pain Score 7 Days Post-SP Block
NCT03430531 (9) [back to overview]Pain Score 60 Minutes Post-SP Block
NCT03430531 (9) [back to overview]Pain Score 30 Day Post-SP Block
NCT03430531 (9) [back to overview]Pain Score 2 Days Post-SP Block
NCT03430531 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Pain Relief
NCT03430531 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complications Due to SP Ganglion Block
NCT03430531 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Recurrence of Post-dural Puncture Headache
NCT03430531 (9) [back to overview]Pain Score 1 Day Post-SP Block
NCT03430986 (5) [back to overview]"Percentage of Participants Who Noted Improved or Much Improved as Assessed by the Participant Using the GAIS in the Treatment Group"
NCT03430986 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) in the Control Period
NCT03430986 (5) [back to overview]"Percentage of Participants Where the Evaluating Investigator Noted Improved or Much Improved Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)"
NCT03430986 (5) [back to overview]"Percentage of Participants Who Noted Satisfied or Very Satisfied With Treatment Outcome on the Nose Satisfaction Scale (NSS) in the Treatment Group"
NCT03430986 (5) [back to overview]Volume Change From Baseline in the Nose Area
NCT03435185 (2) [back to overview]Change of Severity of Headache
NCT03435185 (2) [back to overview]Change of Frequency of Headache
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Number of Hospital Days
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Number of Intensive Care Unti (ICU) Days
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants Discharged From the Hospital With an Opioid Prescription
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Opioid Use Per Day
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Overall Costs
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Pain as Assessed by Score on the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS)
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Pain as Assessed by Score on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Pharmacy Costs
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Opioid-related Complications
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Number of Ventilator Days
NCT03500211 (5) [back to overview]48-hour Postoperative Pain Scores
NCT03500211 (5) [back to overview]36-hour Postoperative Pain Scores
NCT03500211 (5) [back to overview]24-hour Postoperative Pain Scores
NCT03500211 (5) [back to overview]12-hour Postoperative Pain Scores
NCT03500211 (5) [back to overview]5-days Postoperative Narcotic Use
NCT03513757 (13) [back to overview]Total Propofol Administered
NCT03513757 (13) [back to overview]Delirium
NCT03513757 (13) [back to overview]Dexmedetomidine Dose
NCT03513757 (13) [back to overview]Discharge Ready
NCT03513757 (13) [back to overview]Efficiency of Propofol Dexmedetomidine Sedation Compared With Propofol Infusion
NCT03513757 (13) [back to overview]Eye Opening
NCT03513757 (13) [back to overview]Glycopyrrolate Dose
NCT03513757 (13) [back to overview]Irritability
NCT03513757 (13) [back to overview]Lidocaine Dose
NCT03513757 (13) [back to overview]Nitrous Oxide
NCT03513757 (13) [back to overview]Oral/Enteral Intake
NCT03513757 (13) [back to overview]Sevoflurane
NCT03513757 (13) [back to overview]Sleep Pattern
NCT03519204 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT03519204 (7) [back to overview]Procedural Pain Score
NCT03519204 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Lip Volume
NCT03519204 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Injection Site Responses (ISRs)
NCT03519204 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a ≥1-point Increase (Improvement) on the Evaluating Investigator's (EI's) Assessed 5-point Lip Fullness Scale (LFS)
NCT03519204 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a ≥1-point Increase (Improvement) Based on the Participant's Assessed 5-point LFS
NCT03519204 (7) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Lip Surface Area
NCT03540030 (16) [back to overview]Falls
NCT03540030 (16) [back to overview]Falls
NCT03540030 (16) [back to overview]Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12©) Physical Health Subscore, and Mental Health Subscore
NCT03540030 (16) [back to overview]Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12©) Physical Health Subscore, and Mental Health Subscore
NCT03540030 (16) [back to overview]Additional Post Op Pain
NCT03540030 (16) [back to overview]ASES
NCT03540030 (16) [back to overview]Morphine Use
NCT03540030 (16) [back to overview]Post Op Pain
NCT03540030 (16) [back to overview]Simple Shoulder Test
NCT03540030 (16) [back to overview]Simple Shoulder Test
NCT03540030 (16) [back to overview]Pain Satisfaction
NCT03540030 (16) [back to overview]Constipation
NCT03540030 (16) [back to overview]Constipation
NCT03540030 (16) [back to overview]Pain Satisfaction
NCT03540030 (16) [back to overview]Nausea
NCT03540030 (16) [back to overview]Nausea
NCT03562481 (4) [back to overview]Mean Pain Scores Following Injection
NCT03562481 (4) [back to overview]Mean Time to Baseline Lip Sensation
NCT03562481 (4) [back to overview]Average Serum Lidocaine Concentration at 15 Minutes Post Injection
NCT03562481 (4) [back to overview]Mean Time to Lower Lip Numbness Following Injection
NCT03583359 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Device and/or Injection Related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Device and/or Injection Related Serious TEAEs
NCT03583359 (4) [back to overview]Responder Rate According to the Merz Jawline Assessment Scale (MJAS)
NCT03583359 (4) [back to overview]Responder Rate According to the MJAS as Assessed by Independent Panel Reviewers (IPRs)
NCT03583359 (4) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Face-Q Satisfaction
NCT03595449 (2) [back to overview]Mean Total Amount of Intervention (Lidocaine or Surgilube) Used
NCT03595449 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change in Patient Perception of Pain Score
NCT03630198 (2) [back to overview]Pain Outcome: Visual Analog Scale
NCT03630198 (2) [back to overview]Pain Outcome: Visual Analog Scale
NCT03636451 (4) [back to overview]Pain With Uterine Aspiration
NCT03636451 (4) [back to overview]Pain With Cervical Dilation
NCT03636451 (4) [back to overview]Pain 10 Minutes Post Procedure
NCT03636451 (4) [back to overview]Overall Pain
NCT03650387 (9) [back to overview]Responder Rate for Cheek Fullness Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the Merz Upper Cheek Fullness Scale (MUCFS) at Week 12/16 (Depending on Touch-up)
NCT03650387 (9) [back to overview]Responder Rate for Marionette Lines Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the Merz Marionette Lines Scale (MMLS) at Week 12/16 (Depending on Touch-up)
NCT03650387 (9) [back to overview]Responder Rate for Nasolabial Folds Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the Merz Nasolabial Folds Scale (MNLFS) at Week 12/16 (Depending on Touch-up)
NCT03650387 (9) [back to overview]Responder Rate for Cheek Fullness Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the MUCFS at Week 4 (Prior to Optional Touch-up), at Week 24/28, at Week 48/52, and at Week 72/76 (Depending on Touch-up)
NCT03650387 (9) [back to overview]Responder Rate for Marionette Lines Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the MMLS at Week 4 (Prior to Optional Touch-up), at Week 24/28, at Week 48/52, and at Week 72/76 (Depending on Touch-up)
NCT03650387 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT03650387 (9) [back to overview]Responder Rate for Nasolabial Folds Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the MNLFS at Week 4 (Prior to Optional Touch-up), at Week 24/28, at Week 48/52, and at Week 72/76 (Depending on Touch-up)
NCT03650387 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Based on Treating Investigator's Evaluation of the Global Aesthetic Improvement on the iGAIS at Week 4 (Prior to Optional Touch-up), Week 12/16, Week 24/28, Week 48/52, and Week 72/76 (Depending on Touch-up Performed)
NCT03650387 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Based on Participant's Evaluation of the Global Aesthetic Improvement on the sGAIS at Week 4 (Prior to Optional Touch-up), Week 12/16, Week 24/28, Week 48/52, and Week 72/76 (Depending on Touch-up Performed)
NCT03654417 (8) [back to overview]Provider's Opinion of Subject Tolerance as Measured by a Scale
NCT03654417 (8) [back to overview]Pain During Biopsy as Measured by a Pain Scale
NCT03654417 (8) [back to overview]Baseline Vulvar Pain
NCT03654417 (8) [back to overview]Anxiety Before the Procedure as Measured by an Anxiety Scale
NCT03654417 (8) [back to overview]Acceptance of the Procedure as Measured by a Satisfaction Scale
NCT03654417 (8) [back to overview]Tolerance of Procedure as Measured by a Satisfaction Scale
NCT03654417 (8) [back to overview]Provider's Overall Satisfaction With the Procedure as Measured by a Scale
NCT03654417 (8) [back to overview]Highest Pain Score
NCT03661996 (8) [back to overview]"Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS Pain Subscale Score by Subject Type"
NCT03661996 (8) [back to overview]"Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS Knee-Related Quality of Life Subscale Score by Subject Type"
NCT03661996 (8) [back to overview]"Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS Function (Sport and Recreational Activities) Subscale Score by Subject Type"
NCT03661996 (8) [back to overview]"Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS Function (Daily Living) Subscale Score by Subject Type"
NCT03661996 (8) [back to overview]"Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS Pain With Walking Single Question Score by Subject Type"
NCT03661996 (8) [back to overview]"Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS Symptoms Subscale Score by Subject Type"
NCT03661996 (8) [back to overview]Determination of Optimal Procedure for Administering CNTX-4975-05 With Regards to Pain, Participant Satisfaction, and Investigator's Satisfaction
NCT03661996 (8) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain With Walking NPRS (0-10) Score by Subject Type
NCT03663101 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Effect in the Spontaneous NRS Score
NCT03663101 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12
NCT03663101 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the Study
NCT03663101 (6) [back to overview]Time to Peak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS Score
NCT03663101 (6) [back to overview]Time to Onset of Effect in the Spontaneous Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score
NCT03663101 (6) [back to overview]Peak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS Score
NCT03666663 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Reduction in Headache Days From Baseline to Month 8 of Treatment
NCT03704584 (3) [back to overview]Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS-pain) Daily Until Post-injection Day 7
NCT03704584 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Subsequent Reinjection and Surgical Operation
NCT03704584 (3) [back to overview]10 Point Likert Scale of Pain Scores Before the Injection and After the Injection and During Follow up in the Corticosteroid Plus Lidocaine Group as Compared to the Corticosteroid Alone Group
NCT03720119 (2) [back to overview]Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
NCT03720119 (2) [back to overview]Change of Pain Intensity From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NCT03796728 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS)
NCT03796728 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS
NCT03796728 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
NCT03796728 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories
NCT03796728 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale
NCT03796728 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale
NCT03796728 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Satisfaction With Lips as Measured by the FACE-Q Lips Questionnaire
NCT03796728 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1-point Improvement (Increase) in the Lip Fullness Scale (LFS2) Compared to Baseline Assessment at Day 30
NCT03796728 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale
NCT03799484 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Perceive a Difference in Efficacy Between the 2 Sides of Their Face
NCT03799484 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Perceive a Difference in Efficacy Between the 2 Sides of Their Face
NCT03799484 (9) [back to overview]Perception of Pain Immediately After Injection as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale
NCT03799484 (9) [back to overview]Eyebrow Excursion
NCT03799484 (9) [back to overview]Eyebrow Excursion
NCT03799484 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Botulinum Toxin Type A Effect
NCT03799484 (9) [back to overview]Eyebrow Excursion
NCT03799484 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Perceive a Difference in Efficacy Between the 2 Sides of Their Face
NCT03799484 (9) [back to overview]Eyebrow Excursion
NCT03810235 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Postoperative Complications
NCT03810235 (12) [back to overview]Number of Opioid Pills Prescribed at Discharge
NCT03810235 (12) [back to overview]Neonatal Outcomes: Gestational Age at Delivery
NCT03810235 (12) [back to overview]Length of Hospital Stay
NCT03810235 (12) [back to overview]Time to First Rescue Opioid Analgesic Medication
NCT03810235 (12) [back to overview]Total Dose of Opioids During the Whole Hospitalization.
NCT03810235 (12) [back to overview]Total Dose of Opioids Received in the First 24 Hours Following Cesarean
NCT03810235 (12) [back to overview]Dose Opioids (Measured in Total Morphine Milligram Equivalents (mg) of All Pills) Prescribed at Discharge
NCT03810235 (12) [back to overview]Post-operative Pain Score at 24 Hours Post-operatively
NCT03810235 (12) [back to overview]Total Dose of Opioids Used in the First 48 Hours Post-operatively
NCT03810235 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Opioid-related Side Effects
NCT03810235 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complications of Lidocaine Use
NCT03824808 (5) [back to overview]Post-operative PACU Time
NCT03824808 (5) [back to overview]Difference in Post-operative Pain Scores Measured by Visual Analog Scale
NCT03824808 (5) [back to overview]Difference in Post-operative Pain Scores Measured by Visual Analog Scale
NCT03824808 (5) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption
NCT03824808 (5) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption
NCT03829618 (5) [back to overview]Anesthesia Time to Wake up
NCT03829618 (5) [back to overview]Cough
NCT03829618 (5) [back to overview]Fentanyl Dosing
NCT03829618 (5) [back to overview]Propofol Dosing
NCT03829618 (5) [back to overview]Alfentanyl Dosing
NCT03869450 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Assessed as Having Natural Treatment Results
NCT03869450 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Aesthetic Improvement of Midface
NCT03869450 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improved Midface Volume
NCT03885596 (5) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Scores at 72 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
NCT03885596 (5) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Scores at 24 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
NCT03885596 (5) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption
NCT03885596 (5) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores (at Rest) Over 72h
NCT03885596 (5) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Scores at 48 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
NCT04003012 (2) [back to overview]Post Lumbar Puncture PRN Pain Medication Usage
NCT04003012 (2) [back to overview]Post Lumbar Puncture Pain: Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale
NCT04005859 (1) [back to overview]Verbal Pain Scale (VRS) - 4 Week Post-op
NCT04023695 (2) [back to overview]Pain Outcome: Visual Analog Scale
NCT04023695 (2) [back to overview]Pain Outcome: Visual Analog Scale
NCT04038099 (11) [back to overview]Sensation as Indicated by the Volume of Water Filled (ml) at the Time of Patient Perception of First Sensation, First Urge to Void, Strong Urge to Void, and Full Bladder Capacity During Bladder Filling.
NCT04038099 (11) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Pain/Discomfort as Indicated by Visual Analog Scale (Scale of 0-100 With 0 Being no Pain and 100 Being the Worst the Pain Imaginable).
NCT04038099 (11) [back to overview]Voiding Metrics: Voiding Pattern (Normal vs. Intermittent/Interrupted vs Prolonged) as Perceived by Provider Interpretation of Pressure Flow Study During Voiding Based on Seconds to Void and Whether Urine Stream is Constant or Intermittent/Interrupted.
NCT04038099 (11) [back to overview]Filling Metrics: Number of Participants With Detrusor Overactivity
NCT04038099 (11) [back to overview]Filling Metrics: Number of Participants With Normal Bladder Compliance
NCT04038099 (11) [back to overview]Voiding Metrics: Percentage of Voiding Efficiency
NCT04038099 (11) [back to overview]Voiding Metrics: Pdet Peak Flow
NCT04038099 (11) [back to overview]Voiding Metrics: Pdet Max
NCT04038099 (11) [back to overview]Voiding Metrics: Voided Volume and Post-void Residual
NCT04038099 (11) [back to overview]Provider Perception of Patient Pain/Discomfort as Indicated by Visual Analog Scale (Scale of 0-100 With 0 Being no Pain and 100 Being the Worst Pain Imaginable).
NCT04038099 (11) [back to overview]Voiding Metrics: Maximum Flow Rate
NCT04055116 (3) [back to overview]Onset of Soft Tissue Anesthesia
NCT04055116 (3) [back to overview]Patient Reported Pain Perception
NCT04055116 (3) [back to overview]Provider Reported Pain Perception
NCT04069585 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders Based on the Intra-individual Improvement of at Least One Grade on the Perioral Rhytids Severity Rating Scale (PR-SRS) Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the TI
NCT04069585 (9) [back to overview]"Number of Both Satisfied or Very Satisfied Subjects With Study Treatment Using the Subject's Satisfaction Scale"
NCT04069585 (9) [back to overview]Subject's Perception of Treatment Effectiveness as Per the FACE-Q (Perioral Rhytids Domain) Questionnaire.
NCT04069585 (9) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Post Injection Treatment Responses (From Common Treatment Responses (CTR) Diary) for Safety Evaluation of RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine
NCT04069585 (9) [back to overview]Difference Between RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine in Term of Reducing Pain at 15, 30, 45 and 60 Minutes Post-injection in Each Side of the Mouth.
NCT04069585 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of PR-SRS Score for RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent Vs RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine for the Correction of Perioral Rhytids as Assessed by the Treating Investigator (TI)
NCT04069585 (9) [back to overview]"Number of Subjects Scored Either Much Improved or Improved on Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) by the Treating Investigator (TI)"
NCT04069585 (9) [back to overview]"Number of Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) Responders (i.e., Scoring Either Much Improved or Improved) on GAI Scale According to Subject's Self-assessment"
NCT04069585 (9) [back to overview]Non-inferiority of RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine in Terms of Reducing Pain During Device Injection Into the Upper Perioral Rhytids.
NCT04087395 (9) [back to overview]Difference Between RHA® 4 With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® 4-Lidocaine in Term of Reducing Pain at 15, 30, 45 and 60 Minutes Post-injection in Nasolabial Folds of Each Side of the Face.
NCT04087395 (9) [back to overview]"Number of Subjects Satisfied or Very Satisfied With Study Treatment Using the Subject's Satisfaction Scale"
NCT04087395 (9) [back to overview]"Number of Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) Responders (i.e., Scoring Either Much Improved or Improved) on GAI Scale According to Subject's Self-assessment"
NCT04087395 (9) [back to overview]Non-inferiority of RHA® 4 With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® 4-Lidocaine in Terms of Reducing Pain During Device Injection Into Nasolabial Folds.
NCT04087395 (9) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Post Injection Treatment Responses (From Common Treatment Responses (CTR) Diary) for Safety Evaluation of RHA® 4 With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® 4-Lidocaine
NCT04087395 (9) [back to overview]Subject's Perception of Treatment Effectiveness as Per the FACE-Q (Nasolabial Folds Domain) Questionnaire. The FACE-Q Measures the Experience and Outcomes of Aesthetic Facial Procedures From the Patient's Perspective.
NCT04087395 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders Based on the Intra-individual Improvement of at Least One Grade on the Nasolabial Folds Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (NLF-WSRS) Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the TI
NCT04087395 (9) [back to overview]Change in NLF WSRS Score Between Baseline and Day 30 as Assessed by the Treating Investigator
NCT04087395 (9) [back to overview]"Number of Subjects Scored Either Much Improved or Improved on Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) by the Treating Investigator (TI)"
NCT04140396 (5) [back to overview]Cumulative Oral Morphine Milligram Equivalent (OME) Consumption at 24 Hours
NCT04140396 (5) [back to overview]Pain Score
NCT04140396 (5) [back to overview]Incentive Spirometry Volumes
NCT04140396 (5) [back to overview]Number of Pulmonary Complication Events
NCT04140396 (5) [back to overview]Length of Hospital Stay
NCT04203225 (2) [back to overview]Need for Additional Local Anesthetic
NCT04203225 (2) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale Pain Score
NCT04208516 (17) [back to overview]Serum Lidocaine Level
NCT04208516 (17) [back to overview]Serum Lidocaine Level
NCT04208516 (17) [back to overview]Pain After Surgery
NCT04208516 (17) [back to overview]Pain After Surgery
NCT04208516 (17) [back to overview]Pain After Surgery
NCT04208516 (17) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption After Surgery
NCT04208516 (17) [back to overview]Local Anesthetic Consumption After Surgery
NCT04208516 (17) [back to overview]Local Anesthetic Consumption After Surgery
NCT04208516 (17) [back to overview]Local Anesthetic Consumption After Surgery
NCT04208516 (17) [back to overview]Local Anesthetic Consumption After Surgery
NCT04208516 (17) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events
NCT04208516 (17) [back to overview]Total Hospital Length of Stay
NCT04208516 (17) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption After Surgery
NCT04208516 (17) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption After Surgery
NCT04208516 (17) [back to overview]Pain After Surgery
NCT04208516 (17) [back to overview]Pain After Surgery
NCT04208516 (17) [back to overview]Serum Lidocaine Level
NCT04216017 (2) [back to overview]American Shoulder Elbow Society Score
NCT04216017 (2) [back to overview]Visual Analogue Scale
NCT04254081 (4) [back to overview]Pain Score 6 Hours After Osmotic Dilator Insertion
NCT04254081 (4) [back to overview]Pain Score at the Time of Osmotic Dilator Insertion
NCT04254081 (4) [back to overview]Pain Score 1 Hour After Osmotic Dilator Insertion
NCT04254081 (4) [back to overview]Pain Score 2 Hours After Osmotic Dilator Insertion
NCT04369950 (8) [back to overview]Pain as Measured by a 11 Point Verbal Scale
NCT04369950 (8) [back to overview]Total Amount of Opioid Used
NCT04369950 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Had Mild, Moderate or Severe Pruritis as Measured by a 3 Point Scale
NCT04369950 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Had Mild, Moderate or Severe Nausea as Measured by a 3 Point Scale
NCT04369950 (8) [back to overview]Total Amount of Opioid Used
NCT04369950 (8) [back to overview]Total Amount of Opioid Used
NCT04369950 (8) [back to overview]Time Until First Opioid Request
NCT04369950 (8) [back to overview]Total Amount of Opioid Used
NCT04443569 (2) [back to overview]Subjective Pain
NCT04443569 (2) [back to overview]Narcotic Use
NCT04467424 (3) [back to overview]Effect of TIVA With Ketofol and Ketofol Plus Lidocaine on Extubation Time in Children
NCT04467424 (3) [back to overview]Effect of TIVA With Ketofol and Ketofol Plus Lidocaine on Total Opioid Consumption
NCT04467424 (3) [back to overview]Effect of TIVA With Ketofol and Ketofol Plus Lidocaine on Length of Stay in the PACU
NCT04495868 (2) [back to overview]Skin Wheal Pain Score
NCT04495868 (2) [back to overview]Needle Placement Pain Score
NCT04591353 (1) [back to overview]Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT04766996 (2) [back to overview]Total Post-operative Opioid Requirements With Non-opioid Drug Regimen
NCT04766996 (2) [back to overview]Nebraska Interprofessional Education Attitude Scale (NIPEAS) Score for Professional Staff Arm
NCT04822597 (12) [back to overview]Short Form McGill VAS Pain Score
NCT04822597 (12) [back to overview]Short Form McGill Sensory Pain Score
NCT04822597 (12) [back to overview]Short Form McGill Combined Pain Score
NCT04822597 (12) [back to overview]"Recommendation of Pain Control Modality as Measured by Number of Participants Who Answered Yes"
NCT04822597 (12) [back to overview]Degree of Anxiety During the Injection as Measured by Number of Participants Moderately Anxious
NCT04822597 (12) [back to overview]Degree of Participant Satisfaction With Attention Paid to Complaints as Reported by Number of Participants Who Report Satisfied or Very Satisfied
NCT04822597 (12) [back to overview]Degree of Participant Satisfaction With Care Provided During Injection as Reported by Number of Participants Who Report Satisfied or Very Satisfied
NCT04822597 (12) [back to overview]Degree of Participant Satisfaction With Pain Control as Reported by Number of Participants Who Report Satisfied or Very Satisfied
NCT04822597 (12) [back to overview]Median Post-Procedural Pain Score
NCT04822597 (12) [back to overview]Provider Perceived Ease of Administration
NCT04822597 (12) [back to overview]Provider Perceived Participant Pain
NCT04822597 (12) [back to overview]Short Form McGill Affective Pain Score
NCT04987372 (2) [back to overview](ICDSC)Delirium After Stop Sedation by Using Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist
NCT04987372 (2) [back to overview]Postoperative Pain After Cardiac Surgery
NCT05149287 (3) [back to overview]Post-operative Narcotic Use
NCT05149287 (3) [back to overview]Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score
NCT05149287 (3) [back to overview]Change in RU SATED Score
NCT05867342 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Surgery
NCT05867342 (7) [back to overview]Number of Days With Postoperative Bloody Nasal Discharge
NCT05867342 (7) [back to overview]Number of Extra Pledgets Used
NCT05867342 (7) [back to overview]Number of Nostrils With Continuous Fresh Bleeding
NCT05867342 (7) [back to overview]Postoperative Bloody Discharge Grading Score
NCT05867342 (7) [back to overview]Surgical Field Grading Score
NCT05867342 (7) [back to overview]Estimated Blood Loss During Surgery

Headache Severity as Measured on an 11-point Verbal Scale (0 to 10):0=No Pain 10=Excruciating Pain

Headache severity was assessed on an 11-point verbal scale twenty minutes after treatment (NCT00203294)
Timeframe: 20 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine 2% and Bupivacaine 0.25% Plus Saline-3.29
Lidocaine 2% and Bupivacaine 0.25% Plus Triamcinolone 40 mg.-3.70

[back to top]

Average Weekly NRS for Frequency at 6 Weeks

NRS - numerical rating scale, 0-10 is the range, and higher scores are worse frequency (NCT00427648)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionscore on a 0-10 scale (Median)
1/Xylocaine4
2/Normal Saline4

[back to top]

Median Number of Daily Voiding Episodes at 12 Months.

(NCT00427648)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionvoids/day (Median)
1/Xylocaine7
2/Normal Saline8

[back to top]

SF-12 Physical at 6 Weeks

SF-12 physical is an abbreviated version of the SF-36 a widely used, general health care quality of life instrument. Scores range from 0-100, and higher scores are better outcomes. (NCT00427648)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionscore on scale (Median)
1/Xylocaine49
2/Normal Saline56

[back to top]

Median Number of Daily Voiding Episodes (by 3-day Voiding Diary) at Six Weeks.

(NCT00427648)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionvoids/day (Median)
1/Active9.5
2/Placebo9

[back to top]

Cystometric Assessment of Maximal Bladder Capacity at 6 Weeks Only.

This is based on retrograde infusion of sterile water into the bladder using a catheter, the maximum tolerated volume serving to define how much distension a woman can tolerate. (NCT00427648)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionmL (Median)
1/Xylocaine316
2/Normal Saline275

[back to top]

Global Assessment of Change - Frequency at 6 Weeks

This is patient overall assessment of change in overactive bladder symptoms after treatment. 0% is no change, 100% is total resolution of symptoms (NCT00427648)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionpercent improvement (Median)
1/Xylocaine40
2/Normal Saline10

[back to top]

OAB-q (Symptom Scale) at 6 Weeks

OAB-q SS is a 7 item overactive bladder symptom bother sub scale, ranging from 0-100, higher scores mean worse outcome for bother (NCT00427648)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
1/Xylocaine15
2/Normal Saline28

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Repeat Treatment Period

"Count of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) from the time of injection for the repeat treatment period up to week 47. AEs are presented regardless of relationship to study device and/or procedure.~If a participant had more than one occurrence of the same AE, he/she was counted only once. The most severe occurrence of an AE, as well as most extreme relationship of the AE to the device, was indicated in cases of multiple occurrences of the same AE. For AEs by relationship, procedure-related and device-related AEs are not mutually exclusive and therefore are not additive." (NCT00444626)
Timeframe: weeks 36 up to 47 weeks

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Patients with at least one Adverse Event (AE)AEs by Severity - MildAEs by Severity - ModerateAEs by Severity - SevereAEs by Relationship - Procedure or Device (DGE)AEs by Relationship - Procedure RelatedAEs by Relationship - Device (DGE) RelatedAEs by Duration - less than or equal to 7 daysAEs by Duration - more than 7 daysAEs by Treatment - No TreatmentAEs by Treatment - MedicationAEs by Treatment - Non-drug TherapyAEs by Treatment - HospitalizationPatients with a Serious AEsPatients with Study Discontinuation due to AEsNumber of Deaths
Dermal Gel Extra (DGE)5532194545051441141770000
Non-NLF9522222723600100
Restylane - Dermal Gel Extra (DGE)523415350464744840570000

[back to top]

Participant Product Preference at Week 24

Participants indicated their product preference at Week 24 after Date of Optimal Correction (DOC). (NCT00444626)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Dermal Gel Extra (DGE)56
Restylane68

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least a 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Blinded Evaluator's Assessment of Wrinkle Severity at Week 24

Count of participants with at least a 1-point improvement from Baseline in the Genzyme 6-Point Grading Scale (GGS) at Week 24. A GGS score of zero indicates no wrinkles and a score of 5 indicates very deep wrinkles with redundant folds. (NCT00444626)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Dermal Gel Extra (DGE)114
Restylane113

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Blinded Evaluator's Assessment of Nasolabial Folds (NLF) Wrinkle Severity at Week 36

"Mean change between Baseline and the Week 36 score (Baseline minus week 36 scores) in the blinded evaluators' assessments of NLF wrinkle severity. A positive value for the mean change indicates an improvement.~Genzyme 6-Point Grading Scale (GGS) for NLF was used for the assessment. A GGS score of zero indicates no wrinkles and a score of 5 indicates very deep wrinkles with redundant folds." (NCT00444626)
Timeframe: Week 36

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Dermal Gel Extra (DGE)1.3
Restylane1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Blinded Evaluator's Assessment of Nasolabial Fold (NLF) Wrinkle Severity at Week 24

"This was a comparison of the mean change between Baseline and the Week 24 score (baseline minus week 24 scores) in the blinded evaluators' assessments of NLF wrinkle severity. A positive value for the mean change indicates an improvement.~Genzyme 6-Point Grading Scale (GGS) for NLF was used for the assessment. A GGS score of zero indicates no wrinkles and a score of 5 indicates very deep wrinkles with redundant folds." (NCT00444626)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Dermal Gel Extra (DGE)1.8
Restylane1.8

[back to top]

Participant's Pain Assessment During the Initial Treatment Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The pain experienced by each participant at the time of injection (time 0) and at 15 and 30 minutes after injection during the initial treatment visit was evaluated. Pain was measured using a VAS of 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain). (NCT00444626)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
0 time after injection15 minutes after injection30 minutes after injection
Dermal Gel Extra (DGE)23.26.13.3
Restylane48.916.37.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Initial Treatment Period

"Counts of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) from the time of injection up to Week 36. AEs are presented regardless of relationship to study device and/or procedure.~If a participant had more than one occurrence of the same AE, he/she was counted only once. The most severe occurrence of an AE, as well as the most extreme relationship of the AE to the device, was indicated in cases of multiple occurrences of the same AE. For AEs by relationship, procedure-related and device-related AEs are not mutually exclusive and therefore are not additive." (NCT00444626)
Timeframe: Weeks 1-36

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Patients with at least one Adverse Event (AE)AEs by Severity - MildAEs by Severity - ModerateAEs by Severity - SevereAEs by Relationship - Procedure or DeviceAEs by Relationship - Procedure RelatedAEs by Relationship - Device RelatedAEs by Duration - less than or equal to 7 daysAEs by Duration - more than 7 daysAEs by Treatment - No TreatmentAEs by Treatment - MedicationAEs by Treatment - Non-drug TherapyAEs by Treatment - HospitalizationPatients with Baseline AEsPatients with Serious AEsPatients with Study Discontinuation due to AEsNumber of Deaths
Dermal Gel Extra (DGE)99473715986991702954133200000
Non-NLF2813105532523618310110
Restylane895824787617867225782400000

[back to top]

Participant Product Preference at Week 36

Participants indicated their product preference at Week 36 after Date of Optimal Correction (DOC). (NCT00444626)
Timeframe: Week 36

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Dermal Gel Extra (DGE)62
Restylane55

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Report the Ability to Have Intercourse

Participants' response upon inquiry. (NCT00450242)
Timeframe: baseline, week 8

Interventionparticipants (Number)
5% Lidocaine Cream4
Placebo Cream6

[back to top]

Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scores With Intercourse From Baseline to Week 8

"Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores (range 0-100 mm; 0 = none, 100 = worst pain) were recorded for pain during intercourse during baseline and week 8 of the study, for lidocaine treated subjects and controls. The mean listed for each group is average week 8 score subtracted from the average baseline score." (NCT00450242)
Timeframe: baseline, week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
5% Lidocaine Cream2.5
Placebo Cream19.7

[back to top]

Successful Treatment

Greater or equal to 50% pain relief plus procedural satisfaction lasting at least 3 months. What is being measured is the number of participants with a positive outcome. (NCT00484159)
Timeframe: 3-months postprocedure

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Double-block Group9
Single-block Group7
Radiofrequency Group17

[back to top]

Cost Per Successful Procedure

Total cost per effective treatment at 3-months. Successful procedure defined as greater or equal to 50% pain relief and satisfaction lasting at least 3 months. (NCT00484159)
Timeframe: 3-months

InterventionU.S. dollars (Number)
Double-block Group15,241
Single-block Group17,142
Radiofrequency Group6286

[back to top]

Supplemental Analgesia in First 48 Hours

Participants requesting supplemental analgesia in first 48 hours (NCT00487084)
Timeframe: 48 hours

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Morphine - 2 Chloroprocaine - Saline (MCS)12
Saline-2 Chloroprocaine - Morphine (SCM)8
Saline - Lidocaine - Morphine (SLM)12

[back to top]

Supplemental Analgesia in First 90 Minutes

Participants requesting supplemental analgesia in the first 90 minutes following study drug (NCT00487084)
Timeframe: 90 min

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Morphine - 2 Chloroprocaine - Saline (MCS)0
Saline-2 Chloroprocaine - Morphine (SCM)10
Saline - Lidocaine - Morphine (SLM)0

[back to top]

Verbal Rating Score (0 to 10) for Pain (VRPS)

Verbal Rating Pain Score (VRPS) at time of post-anesthesia recovery room entry, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable (NCT00487084)
Timeframe: At recovery room entry

InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Morphine - 2 Chloroprocaine - Saline (MCS)2
Saline-2 Chloroprocaine - Morphine (SCM)2
Saline - Lidocaine - Morphine (SLM)0

[back to top]

Duration of Continuing Analgesia

Time to first request for supplemental analgesia (NCT00487084)
Timeframe: 48 hours

Interventionhours (Median)
Morphine - 2 Chloroprocaine - Saline (MCS)28.6
Saline-2 Chloroprocaine - Morphine (SCM)2.2
Saline - Lidocaine - Morphine (SLM)25.8

[back to top]

Blinded Observer's Subjective Ratings of the Participant's Pain Level at 5 Minutes Post Venipuncture Procedure, Using a 6-point NRS

The NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) is a 6-point rating scale where 0= no pain and 5 = worst pain. Blinded observers reported their own subjective evaluation of the level of pain participants were experiencing 5 minutes after the venipuncture was completed. Total number of participants subjectively evaluated as experiencing each pain level is reported. (NCT00530803)
Timeframe: 5 minutes post venipuncture

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants evaluated at NRS = 0 (No pain)Participants evaluated at NRS = 1Participants evaluated at NRS = 2Participants evaluated at NRS = 3Participants evaluated at NRS = 4Participants evaluated at NRS = 5
EMLA Cream4531100
Synera Patch4541000

[back to top]

Blinded Observer's Subjective Ratings of the Participant's Pain Level at Needle Insertion, Using a 6-point NRS

The NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) is a 6-point rating scale where 0= no pain and 5 = worst pain. Blinded observers reported their own subjective evaluation of the level of pain experienced by the participants at needle insertion. Total number of participants subjectively evaluated as experiencing each pain level is reported. (NCT00530803)
Timeframe: during needle insertion

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants evaluated at NRS = 0 (No pain)Participants evaluated at NRS = 1Participants evaluated at NRS = 2Participants evaluated at NRS = 3Participants evaluated at NRS = 4Participants evaluated at NRS = 5
EMLA Cream32142200
Synera Patch25129220

[back to top]

Parent Rating of Child's Pain Using a 6-point NRS

The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a 6-point rating scale where 0= no pain and 5 = worst pain. Parents reported their own subjective evaluation of participants pain level. Each participant had only one parental assessment. Total number of parental assessment for each pain level on the 6-point NRS is reported as total number of participants experiencing that pain level. (NCT00530803)
Timeframe: immediately after venipuncture is completed

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
number of participants with NRS=0 (no pain)number of participants with NRS=1number of participants with NRS=2number of participants with NRS=3number of participants with NRS=4number of participants with NRS=5
EMLA Cream4261100
Synera Patch4151201

[back to top]

Participants Self-rating of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.

"Participants were asked to report their level of pain using a 6-point Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale ranging from 0, no pain, to 5, the most pain you can have. The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale is a validated tool for measuring pain in patients as young as 3 years old. A FACES pain score less than or equal to 2 is considered no pain to mild pain, and is clinically acceptable. Studies have shown average FACES pain scores for children receiving vascular access with placebo to be 2.2 to 3.5." (NCT00530803)
Timeframe: immediately after completion of venipuncture

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with FACES Score = 0 (No pain)Participants with FACES Score = 1Participants with FACES Score = 2Participants with FACES Score = 3Participants with FACES Score = 4Participants with FACES Score = 5
EMLA Cream4262000
Synera Patch3883100

[back to top]

Blinded Observer's Subjective Ratings of Participants' Pain Level at Tourniquet Placement, Using a 6-point NRS

The NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) is a 6-point rating scale where 0= no pain and 5 = worst pain. Blinded observers reported their own subjective evaluation of the level of pain experienced by the participants at tourniquet placement. Total number of participants subjectively evaluated as experiencing each pain level is reported. (NCT00530803)
Timeframe: before venipuncture

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants evaluated at NRS = 0 (No pain)Participants evaluated at NRS = 1Participants evaluated at NRS = 2Participants evaluated at NRS = 3Participants evaluated at NRS = 4Participants evaluated at NRS = 5
EMLA Cream4162100
Synera Patch3765110

[back to top]

Percentage of Procedures With Success

Whether the Lumbar Puncture resulted in recovery of spinal fluid that could be sent for usual testing (NCT00533468)
Timeframe: During patient's Emergency Department Stay

Interventionpercentage of procedures (Number)
Placebo96
Active Drug75

[back to top]

Time of Procedure

Time, measured in minutes, required to complete procedure from infant's presentation to the Emergency Department (NCT00533468)
Timeframe: Infant's stay in the Emergency Department

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Placebo31
Active Drug36

[back to top]

Neonatal Facial Coding System Score

10 measures of pain, all scored 0 or 1, high score means more pain. No pain would be recorded as zero, maximum pain recorded as 10 (NCT00533468)
Timeframe: Score was measured at baseline, upon positioning for the procedure, immediately prior to needle insertion, during needle insertion, 1 minute post-needle insertion, and post-procedure when the infant had recovered from the procedure and was swaddled

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselinePositioningPre-needleNeedle InsertionPost-needle InsertionPost-procedure
Active Drug3.986.79.96.15.9
Placebo4.68.37.69.35.74.2

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve

Pharmacokinetics were evaluated in patients with sufficient dosing information and plasma concentration versus time data over 0-24 hours following vinorelbine infusion to allow calculation of area-under-the-curve from zero to 24 hours after infusion (AUC0-24). Furthermore, dose-normalization of AUC0-24 to the standard 30 mg/m2 dose was performed to allow evaluation of the relationship between liver function and AUC of vinorelbine. Data were collected at 0 and 24 hours post-dose. (NCT00540982)
Timeframe: 2 months post treatment

Interventionng/ml x hr (Median)
Normal271
Mild537
Moderate341
Severe324

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Toxicities

Grade 3 & 4 toxicities at least possible related to study drugs during any cycle of treatment. Toxicity graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 2.0. (NCT00540982)
Timeframe: 3 weeks after the stop of treatment

,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AnemiaLymphopeniaNeutropeniaThrombocytopeniaAnorexia/weight lossAscitesCerebrovascular ischemiaConfusionConstipationDehydrationDiarrheaDyspneaEdemaFatigueGeneralized weaknessHallucinationsHypotensionHypertensionInfection (including febrile neutropenia)ThromboembolismAbnormal LFTsHypercalcemiaHyperglycemiaHyperkalemiaHypophosphatemiaNeuropathyPainPetechiae/purpuraPulmonary hemorrhageElevated INRHypokalemiaHyponatremia
Mild (15mg/m2)00100000000000000000000000000000
Mild (20mg/m2)20200000000000000000001000000000
Mild (30mg/m2)00100000000000000000101000000000
Moderate (15mg/m2)31411010110000000012310110000000
Moderate (30mg/m2)10700000020000011120100010100030
Normal (30mg/m2)11400000011001001000003000100000
Severe (20mg/m2)11421101000111201030301011111121
Severe (7.5mg/m2)00000001100001001000302000000000

[back to top]

Pain on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Pain on 100 mm Visual Aanalog Scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (most pain). (NCT00552695)
Timeframe: 0 MINUTES

Interventionmm (Median)
LIDODERM Patch18
Control Patch35

[back to top]

Success of Intravenous (IV) Insertion

Percentage of patients in whom intravenous catheter was inserted successfully (NCT00552695)
Timeframe: After first attempt of catheter insertion

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
LIDODERM Patch18
Control Patch17

[back to top]

Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT): Change From Baseline to During 3 Month Double Blind-treatment

"To evaluate efficacy of treatment with PSD502 compared with placebo in subjects with PE as measured by:~• change in mean IELT from baseline to during the 3 month double-blind treatment~Results provide are ratio (over the 3 months/baseline)." (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 Months

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active4.607
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active1.505

[back to top]

Change in the Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE) Domains of Ejaculatory Control, Distress and Sexual Satisfaction From Baseline to Month 1

"Change in the IPE domains of ejaculatory control, distress and sexual satisfaction from Baseline to month 1.~Ejaculatory control scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater ejaculatory control Sexual satisfaction scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater sexual satisfaction Distress scores range from 2 to 10 with a higher score indicating less distress" (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: 1 month

,
InterventionScore (Mean)
Ejaculatory controlDistressSexual satisfaction
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active5.72.55.1
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active1.30.61.8

[back to top]

Change in Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) From Baseline to Month 3

Summary of mean IELT at Baseline and at month 3 during double-blind treatment (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: 3 months

InterventionSeconds (Geometric Mean)
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active140.964
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active49.615

[back to top]

Partner Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) at Month 3

Scores for perceived control over ejaculation, personal distress related to ejaculation, satisfaction with sexual intercourse and interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation based on the partner PEP at month 3. Proportion of partners with at least a 1 point category improvement in partner PEP domain scores from baseline to month 3. (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: 3 months

,
Interventionpercentage of partners (Number)
ControlDistressSexual satisfactionInterpersonal difficulty
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active68.964.962.866.9
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active40.850.032.950.0

[back to top]

Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE): Change From Baseline to End of Month 3

"To Evaluate Efficacy of Treatment With PSD502 Compared With Placebo in Subjects With PE as measured by:~• changes in all 3 IPE domains from baseline to month 3~Ejaculatory control scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater ejaculatory control Sexual satisfaction scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater sexual satisfaction Distress scores range from 2 to 10 with a higher score indicating less distress" (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 Months

,
InterventionScore (Mean)
Ejaculatory controlSexual satisfactionDistress
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active7.26.63.5
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active2.22.10.9

[back to top]

Change in the Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE) Domains of Ejaculatory Control, Distress and Sexual Satisfaction From Baseline to Month 2

"Change in the IPE domains of ejaculatory control, distress and sexual satisfaction from Baseline to month 2~Ejaculatory control scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater ejaculatory control Sexual satisfaction scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater sexual satisfaction Distress scores range from 2 to 10 with a higher score indicating less distress" (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: 2 months

,
InterventionScore (Mean)
ControlSatisfactionDistress
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active6.55.82.9
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active1.41.30.7

[back to top]

Subject Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) at Month 2

Scores for perceived control over ejaculation, personal distress related to ejaculation, satisfaction with sexual intercourse and interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation based on the subject PEP at month 2. Proportion of subjects with at least a 1 point category improvement in subject PEP domain scores from baseline to month 2. (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: 2 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ControlDistressSexual satisfactionInterpersonal difficulty
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active67.570.169.475.8
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active24.733.827.342.9

[back to top]

Subject PEP at Month 1

Scores for perceived control over ejaculation, personal distress related to ejaculation, satisfaction with sexual intercourse and interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation based on the subject PEP at month 1. Percentage of subjects with at least a 1 point category improvement in subject PEP domain scores at month 1. (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: 1 month

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ControlDistressSexual satisfactionInterpersonal difficulty
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active59.663.462.772.0
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active23.527.233.351.9

[back to top]

Subject Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) at Month 3

Scores for perceived control over ejaculation, personal distress related to ejaculation, satisfaction with sexual intercourse and interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation based on the subject PEP at month 3. Proportion of subjects with at least a 1 point category improvement in subject PEP domain scores from baseline to month 3. (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: 3 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ControlDistressSexual satisfactionInterpersonal difficulty
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active72.476.973.777.6
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active24.136.736.759.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) > 1 Minute and >2 Minutes During the 3 Months of Double-blind Treatment

Percentage of subjects with mean IELT > 1 minute and >2 minutes during the 3 months of double-blind treatment as measured by the proportion of subjects (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: 3 months

,
Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
IELT > 1 minuteIELT > 2 minutes
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active80.257.5
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active37.814.6

[back to top]

Pain During Dressing Change

A pain assessment tool performed immediately after the dressing change was used to rate pain experienced during the dressing change. For this tool, pain was rated on a scale from 0-10 (0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain) (NCT00585325)
Timeframe: During dressing change

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Instilled 1% Lidocaine6.36
Instilled Placebo (0.9% Normal Saline)6.94

[back to top]

Incidence of Arrhythmias in the Post-Operative Period

Number of participants per arm who experienced arrhythmias while on floor care following dismissal from the ICU. (NCT00587483)
Timeframe: Participants were followed from dismissal from the ICU until dismissal from the hospital.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Ventricular tachycardiaAtrial fibrillationOther arrhythmias
Amiodarone 300 mg24942
Lidocaine 1.5 mg /kg25636
Placebo (Saline)33824

[back to top]

Incidence of Arrhythmias Other Than Ventricular Fibrillation

Number of participants per arm who experienced arrhythmias other than ventricular fibrillation while in the ICU. (NCT00587483)
Timeframe: Participants were followed from randomization through the 60 minute period following myocardial reperfusion.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Ventricular tachycardiaAtrial fibrillationOther arrhythmias
Amiodarone 300 mg22335
Lidocaine 1.5 mg /kg32127
Placebo (Saline)01827

[back to top]

Number of Defibrillation Attempts

(NCT00587483)
Timeframe: Participants were followed from randomization through the 60 minute period following myocardial reperfusion.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
0 Attempts1 - 3 Attempts> 3 Attempts
Amiodarone 300 mg574315
Lidocaine 1.5 mg /kg465316
Placebo (Saline)404614

[back to top]

Use of Vasopressors

Number of participants per arm who required the use of vasopressors in the post-operative period. (NCT00587483)
Timeframe: Participants were followed from randomization until time to discharge from the hospital.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
EpinephrineNorepinephrineVasopressin
Amiodarone 300 mg102
Lidocaine 1.5 mg /kg100
Placebo (Saline)000

[back to top]

Participants Experiencing Ventricular Fibrillation Requiring Defibrillation During the 60 Minute Period Following Myocardial Reperfusion

(NCT00587483)
Timeframe: Participants were followed from randomization through the 60 minute period following myocardial reperfusion.

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Lidocaine 1.5 mg /kg66
Amiodarone 300 mg60
Placebo (Saline)70

[back to top]

Time to Discharge From the Hospital

(NCT00587483)
Timeframe: Participants were followed from the date of randomization until the date of discharge from the hospital, assessed up to 60 days.

InterventionDays (Mean)
Lidocaine 1.5 mg /kg6.183
Amiodarone 300 mg7.5
Placebo (Saline)9.423

[back to top]

Time to Discharge From the Intensive Care Unit

(NCT00587483)
Timeframe: Participants were followed from the date of randomization until the date of discharge from the Intensive Care Unit, assessed up to 40 days.

InterventionDays (Mean)
Lidocaine 1.5 mg /kg1.357
Amiodarone 300 mg5.329
Placebo (Saline)4.847

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Score at 4 Weeks as Measured by Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS)

11-point ordinal scale measuring patient pain, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe/disabling pain). (NCT00588354)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2% Lidociane and Clonidine (200 or 400 ug)4.1
2% Lidocaine and Triamcinolone (40 mg)2.7

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Score at 2 Weeks as Measured by Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS)

11-point ordinal scale measuring patient pain, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe/disabling pain). (NCT00588354)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2% Lidociane and Clonidine (200 or 400 ug)4.1
2% Lidocaine and Triamcinolone (40 mg)4.0

[back to top]

Pain Disability Score at 4 Weeks as Measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

This scale measures functional disability due to back pain. The score of the scale is the total number of items checked, from a minimum of 0 (no disability) to a maximum of 24 (great disability). Roland MO, Morris RW. A study of the natural history of back Pain. Part 1: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine 1983; 8:141-144. (NCT00588354)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2% Lidociane and Clonidine (200 or 400 ug)9.4
2% Lidocaine and Triamcinolone (40 mg)3.5

[back to top]

Pain Score at 4 Weeks as Measured by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI)

The MPI is a comprehensive instrument comprised of 12 scales divided into three parts for assessing a number of dimensions of the chronic pain experience including pain intensity, emotional distress, cognitive and functional adaptation, and social support. Reference: Kearns RO, Turk DC, Rudy TC. The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain 1985; 23:345-356. Subscales were not used; the DOS WHYMPI computer program version 2.1 was used to score the instrument. Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (highest pain). A score of 50 is the mean for patients with chronic pain. (NCT00588354)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2% Lidociane and Clonidine (200 or 400 ug)56.7
2% Lidocaine and Triamcinolone (40 mg)56.9

[back to top]

Pain Score at 2 Weeks as Measured by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI)

The MPI is a comprehensive instrument comprised of 12 scales divided into three parts for assessing a number of dimensions of the chronic pain experience including pain intensity, emotional distress, cognitive and functional adaptation, and social support. Reference: Kearns RO, Turk DC, Rudy TC. The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain 1985; 23:345-356. Subscales were not used; the DOS WHYMPI computer program version 2.1 was used to score the instrument. Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (highest pain). A score of 50 is the mean for patients with chronic pain. (NCT00588354)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2% Lidociane and Clonidine (200 or 400 ug)51.6
2% Lidocaine and Triamcinolone (40 mg)56.0

[back to top]

Pain Disability Score at 2 Weeks as Measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

This scale measures functional disability due to back pain. The score of the scale is the total number of items checked, from a minimum of 0 (no disability) to a maximum of 24 (great disability). Roland MO, Morris RW. A study of the natural history of back Pain. Part 1: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine 1983; 8:141-144. (NCT00588354)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2% Lidociane and Clonidine (200 or 400 ug)9.6
2% Lidocaine and Triamcinolone (40 mg)5.7

[back to top]

Pain Disability Score at 2 Weeks as Measured by Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI)

This questionnaire measures a patient's permanent functional disability. The questionnaire consists of 10 sections with 6 statements each of increasing point value (from 0 to 5). The score is a percentage of the total, with higher score showing greater disability. Minimum detectable change is 10%, with a 90% CI. Change of less than this may be attributable to error in measurement. (NCT00588354)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2% Lidocaine and Clonidine (200 or 400 ug)27.0
2% Lidocaine and Triamcinolone (40 mg)21.3

[back to top]

Pain Disability Score at 4 Weeks as Measured by Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire

This questionnaire measures a patient's permanent functional disability. The questionnaire consists of 10 sections with 6 statements each of increasing point value (from 0 to 5). The score is a percentage of the total, with higher score showing greater disability. Minimum detectable change is 10%, with a 90% CI. Change of less than this may be attributable to error in measurement. (NCT00588354)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2% Lidociane and Clonidine (200 or 400 ug)23.9
2% Lidocaine and Triamcinolone (40 mg)17.0

[back to top]

Overall Treatment Difference in LSMeans for Verran Snyder-Halpern (VSH) Sleep Scale

The VSH Sleep Scale is contained in a 15 item self-report instrument that measures the quality of a patient's sleep over the last 24 hours. Each item is scored on a 0-100 visual analog scale. The VSH is categorized into 3 sleep scales: disturbance (which measures delays and interruptions in sleep)[maximum score = 700], effectiveness (which measures how well sleep refreshed the individual) [maximum score = 600], and supplementation (which measures the need for napping) [maximum score = 400]. The higher the score the greater the value of the sleep characteristic for that patient. (NCT00589979)
Timeframe: Baseline, Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
DisturbanceEffectivenessSupplementation
Lidoderm (Lidocaine 5% Patch)24630349.7
Placebo Patch22430241.4

[back to top]

Investigator Global Impression of Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis (OA) Pain

"Investigators rated their overall impression of change from Baseline to the end of each period during the double-blind treatment period, including premature discontinuation. Change was rated using a categorical scale ranging from very much worse to very much improved. A similar questionnaire was completed by the Investigator." (NCT00589979)
Timeframe: Baseline, Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
6-Very Much Impr, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)6-Very Much Impr, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)6-Very Much Impr, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)5-Much Improved, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)5-Much Improved, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)5-Much Improved, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)4-Min. Improved, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)4-Min. Improved, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)4-Min. Improved, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)3-No Change, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)3-No Change, Period 2 LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)3-No Change, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)2-Minimally Worse, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)2-Minimally Worse, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)2-Minimally Worse, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)1-Much Worse, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)1-Much Worse, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)1-Much Worse, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)0-Very Much Worse, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)0-Very Much Worse, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)0-Very Much Worse, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)
Sequence: Lidoderm - Placebo - Placebo (LPP)3257107434301310131001
Sequence: Placebo - Lidoderm - Lidoderm (PLL)434988274212301100010

[back to top]

Investigator Global Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction

At the end of each period, investigators rated their overall satisfaction with study treatment using a 5-point categorical scale ranging from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied). (NCT00589979)
Timeframe: Baseline, Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
4-Very Satisfied, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL,N=21)4-Very Satisfied, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)4-Very Satisfied, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)3-Satisfied, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL,N=21)3-Satisfied, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)3-Satisfied, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)2-No Preference, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL,N=21)2-No Preference, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)2-No Preference, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)1-Dissatisfied, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL,N=21)1-Dissatisfied, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)1-Dissatisfied, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)0-Very Dissatisfied, Period 1 (LPP,N=21; PLL,N=21)0-Very Dissatisfied, Period 2 (LPP,N=19; PLL,N=20)0-Very Dissatisfied, Period 3 (LPP,N=19; PLL,N=19)
Sequence: Lidoderm - Placebo - Placebo (LPP)7588119111420101
Sequence: Placebo - Lidoderm - Lidoderm (PLL)68119105112501010

[back to top]

Exit Status From Current Study Treatment - Yes

Exit status from a current study treatment was categorized as yes or no for patients who exited prior to the 4-week planned duration. This analysis supports the results of the primary analysis. The number of patients exiting (yes) is reported. (NCT00589979)
Timeframe: Baseline, Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks), or Premature Discontinuation

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Period 1 (Sequence LPP, N=21; Sequence PLL, N=21)Period 2 (Sequence LPP, N=19; Sequence PLL, N=20)Period 3 (Sequence LPP, N=19; Sequence PLL, N=19)
Sequence: Lidoderm - Placebo - Placebo (LPP)1056
Sequence: Placebo - Lidoderm - Lidoderm (PLL)1242

[back to top]

Overall Treatment Difference in the LSMeans of the Average of the Last Two Daily Pain Relief Scale (PRS) Scores

The Pain Relief Scale (PRS) is a 9-point categorical rating scale to assess pain relief during the 24-hours since the last assessment; 0= completely worse and 8= complete pain relief. Patients completed this assessment each day during the run-in period and each day during the double-blind treatment phase in their e-diary. (NCT00589979)
Timeframe: Baseline, End of Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), End of Period 2 (up to 4 weeks) and End of Period 3 (up to 4 weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lidoderm (Lidocaine 5% Patch)4.45
Placebo Patch4.06

[back to top]

Overall Treatment Difference in LSMeans of Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Total Score

The BDI-II is a 21-item self-report instrument intended to assess the existence and severity of symptoms of depression. Patients were to consider each item as it related to the way they felt for the previous 2 weeks. Each of the 21 items corresponding to a symptom of depression was summed to give a single score for the BDI-II, with a 4-point scale for each item ranging from 0-3. A total score of 0-13 is minimal, 14-19 is mild, 20-28 is moderate, and 29-63 is severe. Values were based on measurements taken at Screening, at Baseline (Visit 3), and at the end of each period. (NCT00589979)
Timeframe: Baseline and end of treatment period (up to 4 weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lidoderm (Lidocaine 5% Patch)4.41
Placebo Patch4.29

[back to top]

Overall Treatment Difference in LSMeans for Continuous EuroQol Quality of Life Instrument (EQ-5D) Index Scores

Health status was assessed using the EuroQol Quality of Life Instrument (EQ-5D). Patients completed the EQ-5D assessment at Baseline (Day 0) and at each clinic visit (at least every 4 weeks) or at premature discontinuation. Values of the EQ-5D index score range from -1 (worst) to 1 (best). (NCT00589979)
Timeframe: Baseline, Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks), or Premature Discontinuation

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lidoderm (Lidocaine 5% Patch)0.82
Placebo Patch0.81

[back to top]

Overall Treatment Difference in the LSMeans of the Average of the Last Two Daily Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS)

"The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is an 11-point categorical rating scale to assess pain intensity (PI-NRS); 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. The scale is anchored on the left with No Pain and on the right with Worst Possible Pain. Patients were to complete this assessment at approximately the same time each day during the double-blind treatment period in their e-diary. The overall treatment difference for the Lidoderm (lidocaine patch 5%) and placebo patch was compared by combining data for patients receiving the respective treatment regardless of the randomized study sequence." (NCT00589979)
Timeframe: Baseline, End of Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), End of Period 2 (up to 4 weeks) and End of Period 3 (up to 4 weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lidoderm (Lidocaine 5% Patch)3.03
Placebo Patch3.57

[back to top]

Overall Treatment Difference in LSMeans for Continuous EuroQol Quality of Life Instrument (EQ-5D) Health Status Today Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Health status was assessed using the EuroQol Quality of Life Instrument (EQ-5D). Patients completed the EQ-5D assessment at Baseline and at the end of each period or at premature discontinuation. Values of the continuous EQ-5D health state today (VAS) ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). (NCT00589979)
Timeframe: Baseline, Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks), or Premature Discontinuation

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lidoderm (Lidocaine 5% Patch)81.1
Placebo Patch79.4

[back to top]

Time-to-Exit From Current Study Treatment

Time-to-exit was defined as the number of days at which a patient either met the switching criterion [a 2-category change in the Pain Relief Scale (PRS) score in the worsening direction (increasing pain or decreasing pain relief) for 2 consecutive days] or discontinued from the study. The PRS is a 9-point categorical rating scale to assess pain relief in the last 24 hours in which 0 = completely worse and 8 = complete pain relief. Traditional survival models that consider event times (e.g. median survival time) as independent and homogeneous across patients were not suitable for this study. (NCT00589979)
Timeframe: Baseline, Period 1 (up to 4 weeks ±2 days), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks ±2 days), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks ±2 days), or Premature Discontinuation

,
InterventionDays (Median)
Period 1 ( Sequence LPP, N=21; Sequence PLL, N=21)Period 2 (Sequence LPP, N=19; Sequence PLL, N=20)Period 3 (Sequence LPP, N=19; Sequence PLL, N=19)
Sequence: Lidoderm - Placebo - Placebo (LPP)31NANA
Sequence: Placebo - Lidoderm - Lidoderm (PLL)20NANA

[back to top]

Time-to-Exit Due to Lack of Efficacy

"Time-to-exit due to lack of efficacy was defined as a patient that met the switching criterion (a 2-category change in Pain Relief Scale (PRS) in the worsening direction [increasing pain or decreasing pain relief] for 2 consecutive days) or was discontinued from the current period or study due to lack of efficacy. The PRS is a 9-point categorical rating scale to assess pain relief in the last 24 hours in which 0 = completely worse and 8 = complete pain relief.~No patients discontinued from the study due to lack of efficacy." (NCT00589979)
Timeframe: Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks), or Premature Discontinuation

,
Interventiondays (Median)
Period 1 (Sequence LPP, N=21; Sequence PLL, N=21)Period 2 (Sequence LPP, N=19; Sequence PLL, N=20)Period 3 (Sequence LPP, N=19; Sequence PLL, N=19)
Sequence: Lidoderm - Placebo - Placebo (LPP)NANANA
Sequence: Placebo - Lidoderm - Lidoderm (PLL)NANANA

[back to top]

Quality of Life: Three-Category EuroQol Quality of Life Instrument (EQ-5D) General Health Today Compared to Last 12 Months

Health status was assessed using the EuroQol Quality of Life Instrument (EQ-5D). Patients completed the EQ-5D assessment at Baseline and at the end of each period or at premature discontinuation. Categories included Better, Much the Same, and Worse. (NCT00589979)
Timeframe: Baseline, Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks), or Premature Discontinuation

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Better Baseline (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Better Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Better Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)Better Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)Much the Same Baseline (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Much the Same Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Much the Same Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)Much the Same Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)Worse Baseline (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Worse Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Worse Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)Worse Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)
Sequence: Lidoderm - Placebo - Placebo (LPP)1178910141090010
Sequence: Placebo - Lidoderm - Lidoderm (PLL)4546171516120101

[back to top]

Quality of Life: Four Category Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Composite Score

The BDI-II is a 21-item self-report instrument intended to assess the existence and severity of symptoms of depression. Patients were to consider each item as it related to the way they felt for the previous 2 weeks. Each of the 21 items corresponding to a symptom of depression was summed to give a single score for the BDI-II, with a 4-point scale for each item ranging from 0-3. A total score of 0-13 is minimal, 14-19 is mild, 20-28 is moderate, and 29-63 is severe. Values were based on measurements taken at Screening, at Baseline (Visit 3), and at the end of each period. (NCT00589979)
Timeframe: Screening, Baseline, Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Minimal at Screening (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Minimal at Baseline (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Minimal, end of Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Minimal, end of Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)Minimal, end of Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)Mild at Screening (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Mild at Baseline (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Mild, end of Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Mild, end of Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)Mild, end of Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)Moderate at Screening (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Moderate at Baseline (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Moderate, end of Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Moderate, end of Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)Moderate, end of Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)Severe at Screening (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Severe at Baseline (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Severe, end of Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)Severe, end of Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)Severe, end of Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)
Sequence: Lidoderm - Placebo - Placebo (LPP)2121211919000000000000000
Sequence: Placebo - Lidoderm - Lidoderm (PLL)2020192019111000010000000

[back to top]

Patient Global Impression of Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis (OA) Pain

"Patients rated their overall impression of change from Baseline to the end of each period during the double-blind treatment period, including premature discontinuation. Change was rated using a categorical scale indicating: very much worse (0); much worse (1); minimally worse (2); no change (3); minimally improved (4); much improved (5); and very much improved (6)." (NCT00589979)
Timeframe: Baseline, Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
6-Very Much Impr, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)6-Very Much Impr., Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)6-Very Much Impr., Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)5-Much Improved, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)5-Much Improved, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)5-Much Improved, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)4-Mini. Improved, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)4-Mini. Improved, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)4-Mini. Improved, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)3-No Change, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)3-No Change, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)3-No Change, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)2-Minimally Worse, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL,N=19)2-Minimally Worse, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)2-Minimally Worse, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)1-Much Worse, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)1-Much Worse, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)1-Much Worse, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)0-Very Much Worse, Period 1 (LPP,N=21; PLL, N=21)0-Very Much Worse, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)0-Very Much Worse, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)
Sequence: Lidoderm - Placebo - Placebo (LPP)334698733514010020000
Sequence: Placebo - Lidoderm - Lidoderm (PLL)5248810463122310000010

[back to top]

Patient Global Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction

At the end of each period, patients rated their overall satisfaction with study treatment using a 5-point categorical scale indicating: 0 - very dissatisfied; 1 - dissatisfied; 2 - no preference; 3 - satisfied; and 4 - very satisfied. (NCT00589979)
Timeframe: Baseline, Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
4-Very Satisfied, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)4-Very Satisfied, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)4-Very Satisfied, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)3-Satisfied, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)3-Satisfied, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)3-Satisfied, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)2-No Preference, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)2-No Preference, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)2-No Preference, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)1-Dissatisfied, Period 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)1-Dissatisfied, Period 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)1-Dissatisfied, Period 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)0-Very Dissatisfied, Per. 1 (LPP, N=21; PLL, N=21)0-Very Dissatisfied, Per. 2 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=20)0-Very Dissatisfied, Per. 3 (LPP, N=19; PLL, N=19)
Sequence: Lidoderm - Placebo - Placebo (LPP)12812795101120001
Sequence: Placebo - Lidoderm - Lidoderm (PLL)91012866331100010

[back to top]

Overall Treatment Difference of the LSMeans of the Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS) Scores

The PQAS measures individual pain qualities and the impact of treatment on those qualities. Items 1-19 are each rated on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (lowest score - no pain of that type) to 10 (highest score - the highest level of that type of pain). Average surface pain = average of PQAS items: cold, sensitive, itchy, numb, and tingling. Average deep pain = average of PQAS items: dull, cramping, throbbing, aching, and heavy. Average paroxymal pain = average of PQAS items: sharp, shooting, electric, and radiating. (NCT00589979)
Timeframe: Baseline, Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
IntenseSharpHotDullColdSensitiveTenderItchyShockingNumbElectricalTinglingCrampingRadiatingThrobbingAchingHeavyOverall unpleasantnessIntense deep painIntense surface painAverage surface painAverage deep painAverage paroxysmal pain
Lidoderm (Lidocaine 5% Patch)3.312.501.123.040.620.882.080.901.951.311.321.241.782.032.242.782.122.983.331.610.992.381.78
Placebo Patch3.533.001.593.280.500.961.891.002.361.521.261.242.032.102.063.222.263.553.771.821.052.552.06

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Marinoff Dyspareunia Scale Score at End of Treatment (12 Weeks)

0-3 scale with 0=no dyspareunia and 3= completely prevents intercourse (NCT00590590)
Timeframe: Baseline -12 Weeks

InterventionScore (Mean)
Lidocaine/Diphenhydramine (Combination)-0.6
Lidocaine-0.4
Placebo-0.7

[back to top]

Mean Marinoff Dyspareunia Scale Score (MDSS) at End of Treatment (12 Weeks)

The MDSS consists of a participant rating of their dyspareunia (painful sexual intercourse) on a 0- to 3-point scale. Each numerical value on the scale coincides with a level of pain experienced during sexual intercourse; 0 = no dyspareunia (no pain with intercourse) and 3 = completely prevents intercourse (NCT00590590)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine/Diphenhydramine (Combination)1.8
Lidocaine1.8
Placebo1.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Tenderness (on a 0- to 3-point Scale) on Palpation at End of Treatment (12 Weeks) [Scale Rates the Severity of Pain; 0 =Absent and 3 = Severe]

(NCT00590590)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

InterventionScore (Mean)
Lidocaine/Diphenhydramine (Combination)-3.0
Lidocaine-1.7
Placebo-2.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Vulvar Vestibulitis Symptoms Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at End of Treatment (12 Weeks) [0 = No Symptoms and 100 = As Bad as They Can be]

(NCT00590590)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

InterventionScore (Mean)
Lidocaine/Diphenhydramine (Combination)-10.4
Lidocaine-5.3
Placebo-16.3

[back to top] [back to top]

BPI 12 (Brief Pain Inventory, Question 12) Pain Questionnaire

Change in BPI-12, Worst pain in the last week on 0 (No Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Possible) scale, from baseline to week 12. The data in the Outcome Measure data table represent the comparison of week 12 to baseline using least squares means from the linear mixed model, but data from all time points are included in the Statistical Analyses to arrive at the reported slopes/group x time interactions. (NCT00597766)
Timeframe: Baseline, weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 (7 times)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
20mg Triamcinolone-1.7
40mg Triamcinolone-2.2
60mg Triamcinolone-4.7

[back to top]

Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment, Upper Limb Domain

"Evaluates and measures recovery in post-stroke hemiplegic patients. Items are scored on a 3-point ordinal scale:~0 = cannot perform~= performs partially~= performs fully Scores for 33 motor function items are summed to arrive at a total score ranging from 0 to 66, where higher scores indicate greater motor function Differences baseline to week 12. The data in the Outcome Measure data table represent the comparison of week 12 to baseline using least squares means from the linear mixed model, but data from all time points are included in the Statistical Analyses to arrive at the reported slopes/group x time interactions." (NCT00597766)
Timeframe: Baseline, weeks 4, 8, 12 (4 times)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
20mg Triamcinolone5.1
40mg Triamcinolone4.5
60mg Triamcinolone2.3

[back to top]

Pain Free Abduction Range of Motion (ROM)

Difference in least-squares means (Degrees) from baseline to week 12. The data in the Outcome Measure data table represent the comparison of week 12 to baseline using least squares means from the linear mixed model, but data from all time points are included in the Statistical Analyses to arrive at the reported slopes/group x time interactions. (NCT00597766)
Timeframe: Baseline, weeks 4, 8, 12 (4 times)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
20mg Triamcinolone33.3
40mg Triamcinolone15.2
60mg Triamcinolone28.0

[back to top]

Pain Free External Rotation Range of Motion (ROM)

Differences in least-mean squares (Degrees) from baseline to week 12. The data in the Outcome Measure data table represent the comparison of week 12 to baseline using least squares means from the linear mixed model, but data from all time points are included in the Statistical Analyses to arrive at the reported slopes/group x time interactions. (NCT00597766)
Timeframe: Baseline, weeks 4, 8, 12 (4 times)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
20mg Triamcinolone26.7
40mg Triamcinolone12.7
60mg Triamcinolone10.3

[back to top]

The Effects of an Intrauterine Lidocaine Infusion to Standard Paracervical Block on Decreasing Patient Pain Measured by Visual Analog Scale in First Trimester Abortions.

Subjects perception of pain is measured using a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS).The 100mm Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is an instrument used to capture subjective attitudes that cannot be directly measured. When responding to a VAS item, respondents specify their level of pain by indicating a position along a 100mm continues line: pain scores can range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain imaginable). (NCT00613821)
Timeframe: Immediately (time zero) at uterine aspiration

Interventionmm (Mean)
Lidocaine Infusion71
Paracervical Block Only43

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction With the Essure Tubal Sterilization Procedure

Patients reported their overall satisfaction with the Essure tubal sterilization procedure using a Visual Analog scale (VAS), range 0-100. A score of 0 indicates lowest possible satisfaction and a score of 100 indicates highest possible satisfaction. (NCT00613834)
Timeframe: 30 minutes post-procedure

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Lidocaine Group94
Saline Group93.5

[back to top]

Change in Patient-perceived Pain Between Baseline and Cannulization

Patients rated their pain following speculum insertion (used as baseline) and after insertion of a cannula into both fallopian tubes. Reported pain during cannulization of the right and left fallopian tubes were averaged to obtain the measurement of pain at cannulization. Pain was reported using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS, range 0-100), where a score of 0 indicates no pain and a score of 100 indicates the worst pain imaginable. Baseline pain levels were subtracted from average pain during cannulization: a negative change in VAS score between baseline and cannulization indicates less pain during cannulization and a positive change in VAS score indicates more pain during cannulization. (NCT00613834)
Timeframe: Immediately after speculum insertion and immediately after cannulization

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Lidocaine Group29.5
Saline Group35

[back to top]

Patient Perceived Pain 30 Minutes Post-procedure

Patients rated their pain 30 minutes after speculum removal using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS, range 0-100), where a score of 0 indicates no pain and a score of 100 indicates the worst pain imaginable. (NCT00613834)
Timeframe: 30 minutes post-procedure

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Lidocaine Group20
Control Group32.5

[back to top]

Reported Symptoms

fever, chills, vomiting, heavy bleeding/clots (collected without regard to the specific event) (NCT00617097)
Timeframe: end of study (upon discharge from facility after procedure)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Paracervical Block With Lidocaine3
Paracervical Block With Ketorolac and Lidocaine0

[back to top]

Complications

(NCT00617097)
Timeframe: end of study

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
minorserious
Paracervical Block With Ketorolac and Lidocaine12
Paracervical Block With Lidocaine10

[back to top]

Visual Analogue Scale Regarding Satisfaction Level

100-mm Visual Analogue Scale -- minimum: 0 mm (lower satisfaction), maximum: 100 mm (greater satisfaction) (NCT00617097)
Timeframe: end of study (prior to clinic discharge)

Interventionmm (Mean)
Paracervical Block With Lidocaine62.9
Paracervical Block With Ketorolac and Lidocaine63.6

[back to top]

Level of Pain During Specific Time Intervals Throughout D&C Procedure.

"100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during specific time intervals of D&C procedure: minimum: 0 mm (less pain); maximum: 100 mm (more pain)~Time intervals include: basline expected level of pain during procedure, after speculum insertion, at paracervical block injection, after dilation, end of procedure, and 30 minutes after procedure." (NCT00617097)
Timeframe: Baseline, Speculum Insertion, at Paracervical block injection, After dilation, End of procedure, 30 minutes after procedure

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
expected level of pain during procedureafter speculum insertionduring paracervical block administrationafter cervical dilationimmediately after procedure30 min after procedure
Paracervical Block With Ketorolac and Lidocaine51.732.746.059.864.317.6
Paracervical Block With Lidocaine52.233.650.874.861.521.8

[back to top]

Intensity of Pain

"The pain will measured by using the visual analogue scale, that is represented by a straight line of 100mm starting at absence of pain and ending at point worst pain experienced or imagined." (NCT00628355)
Timeframe: immediately, 1, 3 months after treatment

,
Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
immediately after treatment1 month after treatment3 months after treatment
Anesthesia Injection33.727.120.8
Ischemic Compression52.753.050.8

[back to top]

Clinical Response Rate

We analyzed the clinical response rate considering significative reduction of 50% of visual analogue scale or significative subjective improvement. (NCT00628355)
Timeframe: immediately, 1, 3 months after treatment

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
immediately after treatment1 month after treatment3 months after treatment
Anesthesia Injection45.360.269.9
TENS Plus Ischemic Compression17.58.87.0

[back to top]

The Primary Efficacy Variable Will be the Time-weighted Average Pain Intensity Over 4 Treatment Days Using the 4 Point Categorical Scale.

(NCT00651313)
Timeframe: Two 4-day dosing regimens for two consecutive monthy menstrual cycles

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine 10%0.91
Placebo Gel0.92

[back to top]

Comparative Pain

A 5-point scale (-2 = Right NLF more painful than Left NLF; -1 = Right NLF slightly more painful than Left NLF; 0 = No difference; 1 = Left NLF slightly more painful than Right NLF; 2 = Left NLF more painful than Right NLF). Subjects selected one category from the scale; the percentage of subjects that selected each category is presented. (NCT00653861)
Timeframe: 1 day

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Juvéderm Lidocaine is Less Painful than JuvédermJuvéderm Lidocaine is Slightly Less PainfulNo DifferenceJuvéderm Lidocaine is Slightly More PainfulJuvéderm Lidocaine is More Painful than Juvéderm
Total Study Participants6429043

[back to top]

Nasolabial Fold (NLF) Severity

Determination of improvement in NLF severity score on 5-point NLF Severity Scale (0 = None; 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Severe; 4 = Extreme) two weeks after treatment with Juvederm with Lidocaine (either Ultra or Ultra Plus) in one nasolabial fold and Juvederm (either Ultra or Ultra Plus) in the other nasolabial fold. (NCT00653861)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Improvement using Juvederm UltraImprovement using Juvederm Ultra Plus
Juvéderm Lidocaine NLFs1.61.8
Juvéderm NLFs1.61.8

[back to top]

Procedural Pain Score

Evaluate pain on an 11-point scale, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (NCT00653861)
Timeframe: 1 day

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Juvéderm Lidocaine Nasolabial Folds (NLFs)2.0
Juvéderm Nasolabial Folds (NLFs)5.4

[back to top]

Cold Pain

The participant's foot was immersed up to the ankle into a container filled with ice water of 3°C. Participants were instructed to maintain their foot in the container until the cold pain became intolerable (cold pain tolerance). The length of time was recorded in seconds. This procedure was repeated once with a gap of at least fifteen minutes in-between repeated tests. The range was 0 seconds to 120 seconds (NCT00657358)
Timeframe: baseline, during 20 minute infusion, and 30 minutes after lidocaine infusion

Interventiontime in seconds to withdrawal (Mean)
Baseline - at start of infusionDuring 20 minute lidocaine infusion30 minutes after completion of lidocaine infusion
Lidocaine Administration4250.651.2

[back to top]

Electrical Pain

Peripheral nerve stimulation electrodes were attached to the base and the tip of the third digit and connected to a constant current stimulator (DS7A, Digitimer Ltd, Hertfordshire, England). Ascending electrical stimuli of 2000 mu duration, ranging from 0.5 to 35 mA (ampere) was administered one per second in 0.5 mA increments. Participants were instructed to indicate when they first felt the slightest sense of pain (electrical pain threshold, EPTh) and when they were unable to tolerate a further increase (electrical pain tolerance, EPTo). For each measure, the average of three trials was computed for use in subsequent analyses. Each of the three electrical pain stimuli were presented three times and balanced in order using a Graeco-Latin square design. The pain scale is between 0 and 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable (NCT00657358)
Timeframe: Baseline, during 20 minutes lidocaine infusion, and 30 minutes after completion of lidocaine infusion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline - at time of lidocaine administrationDuring 20 minute lidocaine Infusion30 minutes after compleition of lidocaine infusion
Lidocaine Administration2.402.042.52

[back to top]

Tactile Sensation

Pin prick sensory thresholds (PPT) were obtained by touching the skin in-between the first and second metacarpal bone with a 23-gauge needles which moved freely out of a 10 mL plastic syringe barrel. The pin prick sensation was modified by adding small weights to the 23-gauge needles (from 0.2 to 5.2 mg). A syringe barrel of tuberculin (TB) needles that were cut to different lengths to add the desired weight to the 23-gauge needle. The PPT was determined using the weighted 23-gauge needle in ascending order, according to the method of limits. This assessment was to evaluate whether participants were able to feel the touch of the needle. The participant's arm was placed on a tray table. A linen sheet was suspended in-between two IV poles in such a fashion that the subject's view of his/her hand was blocked. Normal values are between 0.21mg and 5mg. (NCT00657358)
Timeframe: baseline, during 20 minute infusion, and 30 minutes after completion of infusion

Interventionweight in mg (Mean)
Baseline - at start of lidocaine administrationDuring 20 minute Infusion30 Minutes after completion of infusion
Lidocaine Administration.28.27.27

[back to top]

Ischemic Pain

The right arm was exsanguinated by elevating it above heart level for 30 seconds, after which the arm was occluded with a standard blood pressure cuff positioned proximal to the elbow inflated to twice the participant's mean arterial pressure. Participants then performed 20 handgrip exercises of 2-second duration at 4-second intervals at 50% of their maximum grip strength. Pain was rated on a scale from 0 - 10 with 0 being no pain to 10 being the worst pain imaginable. (NCT00657358)
Timeframe: baseline, during 20 minute lidocaine infusion, and 30 minutes after discontinuation of lidocaine infusion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (prior to administration)During 20 Infusion30 After Infusion completed
Lidocaine Administration4.313.493.44

[back to top]

Heat Pain

The thermal procedure involved a baseline assessment of heat pain threshold and tolerance. Contact heat stimuli were delivered using a computer-controlled Medoc Thermal Sensory Analyzer (TSA-II; Ramat Yishai, Israel), which is a peltier elementbased stimulator. Temperature levels were monitored by a thermistor and returned to a preset baseline of 32°C by active cooling at a rate of 10°C/s. The 3 × 3 cm contact probe was applied to the right forearm. The pain scale is between 0 and 10 with 1 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable (NCT00657358)
Timeframe: baseline, during 20 minute lidocaine infusion, and 30 minutes after completion of lidocaine infusion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline - at start of lidocaine infusionDuring 20 minute lidocaine infusion30 minutes after completion of lidocaine infusion
Lidocaine Administration3.012.832.82

[back to top]

Pain Perception

"Assessing heat pain perception (pain intensity) before, during, and after lidocaine infusion by means of patient self-report using a mechanical slide algometer.~The mechanical slide algometer [Price et al. (1994)] looks like a ruler that exposes a red bar with the end-points: no pain (left) and most pain imaginable (right). The use the slider to express their perceived pain. On the back of the ruler a numerical scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) translates the patient's rating into a numeric scale." (NCT00659633)
Timeframe: Participants will be followed from baseline through 128 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineInfusionAfter Infusion
Lidocaine5.403035.14575.13171

[back to top]

Anxiety of Venipuncture

Participant anxiety was measured by the study participant and the objective observer before (anticipatory), during (venipuncture) and after (recovery) venipuncture using a validated visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS is a validated scale that is used to detect small changes in many types of observations. The scale ranges from 0-100 scores on a scale, and here the higher scores indicate higher anxiety levels. Only the participant's mean venipuncture (during venipuncture) anxiety scores are presented in outcome measure results here. (NCT00676364)
Timeframe: During venipuncture

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
ControI Group Receiving Placebo Cream43.1
Investigational Group40.5

[back to top]

Pain From Venipuncture

"Pain was measured immediately after venipuncture by the participant using the six-point FACES scale. FACES in not an acronym, but rather a description of a pain scale that uses pictures of faces in various states of pain. The FACES pain scale is a common scale used to measure pain with scores on a scale. The scale we used had six points from zero (0) to five (5) indicating different levels of pain. Lower scores indicate lower levels of pain, and higher scores indicate higher levels of pain." (NCT00676364)
Timeframe: Pain was measured immediately after venipuncture.

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
ControI Group Receiving Placebo Cream2.2
Investigational Group Receiving 4% Lidocaine Cream2.1

[back to top]

Number and Percent of Participants Able to Tolerate Only a Soft Diet

The number and percent of patients whose post-operative diet has only advanced to a soft diet on post-operative days 1, 3, 5 & 7 (NCT00678379)
Timeframe: post-operative days 1,3,5 & 7.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
post-op day 1post-op day 3post op day 5post op day 7
Lidocaine (1%) + Bupivacaine 0.5%22261710
Lidocaine 1% + Bupivacaine o.5% + Clondine 25mcg26181814
Normal Saline26181313

[back to top]

Number and Percent of Participants Able to Tolerate a Regular Diet

The number and percent of patients whose post-operative diet has to a regular diet on post-operative days 1, 3, 5 & 7 (NCT00678379)
Timeframe: post-operative days 1,3,5 & 7.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
post-op day 1post-op day 3post op day 5post op day 7
Lidocaine (1%) + Bupivacaine 0.5%481826
Lidocaine 1% + Bupivacaine o.5% + Clondine 25mcg1121422
Normal Saline7182124

[back to top]

Total Time Until Discharge From Hospital.

(NCT00678379)
Timeframe: Day of Surgery

Interventionminutes (Median)
Normal Saline122
Lidocaine (1%) + Bupivacaine 0.5%111
Lidocaine 1% + Bupivacaine o.5% + Clondine 25mcg120

[back to top]

Median Number of Pain Medication Doses

The median number of intravenous fentanyl doses administered in the PACU due to pain (NCT00678379)
Timeframe: in recovery room

Interventionnumber of doses (Median)
Normal Saline3.0
Lidocaine (1%) + Bupivacaine 0.5%3
Lidocaine 1% + Bupivacaine o.5% + Clondine 25mcg3

[back to top]

Total Number of Post-operative Doses of Analgesics.

The total number of intravenous fentanyl doses given PACU which will be compared between the three randomized groups (arms) (NCT00678379)
Timeframe: Post-operative thru day 7

Interventionnumber of doses (Median)
Normal Saline12
Lidocaine (1%) + Bupivacaine 0.5%12
Lidocaine 1% + Bupivacaine o.5% + Clondine 25mcg14

[back to top]

Number and Percent of Participants Able to Tolerate Only Liquids

The number and percent of patients whose post-operative diet has advanced to liquids only on post-op days 1, 3, 5 & 7 (NCT00678379)
Timeframe: post-operative days 1,3,5 & 7.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
post-op day 1post-op day 3post op day 5post op day 7
Lidocaine (1%) + Bupivacaine 0.5%33131011
Lidocaine 1% + Bupivacaine o.5% + Clondine 25mcg30231910
Normal Saline168136

[back to top]

Mean Visual Analog Scale Pain Number.

Visual analog pain scale range is 0-10 with 0=no pain and 10 = worst pain ever (NCT00678379)
Timeframe: in recovery room; post-operative days 1,3,5 & 7

,,
Interventionpain score (Mean)
In recovery roomday 1day 3day 5day 7
Lidocaine (1%) + Bupivacaine 0.5%342.522
Lidocaine 1% + Bupivacaine o.5% + Clondine 25mcg35332
Normal Saline33332.5

[back to top]

Change in Serum Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b)

Outcome represents the mean change in serum biomarkers of bone breakdown (TRACP-5b) from baseline visit to day 28. (NCT00682357)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline Visit to Day 28

InterventionU/L (Mean)
Group 1 - Standard Dose-0.153
Group 2 - Low Dose-0.295
Group 3 - Placebo-0.148

[back to top]

Change in Serum Osteocalcin

Change in serum markers of bone formation (osteocalcin) from Day 0 to Day 28. (NCT00682357)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline Visit to Day 28

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Group 1 - Standard Dose-2.18
Group 2 - Low Dose-0.45
Group 3 - Placebo-1.10

[back to top]

Change in Serum Cortisol

Cortisol levels were measured over 28 days. Outcome represents mean change in cortisol level between baseline visit and day 28. (NCT00682357)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline Visit to Day 28

Interventionmcg/dL (Mean)
Group 1 - Standard Dose-1.16
Group 2 - Low Dose0.65
Group 3 - Placebo1.30

[back to top]

Change in Testosterone

Outcome represents the mean change in testosterone level from baseline visit to day 28. (NCT00682357)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline Visit to Day 28

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Group 1 - Standard Dose0.08

[back to top]

Change in Pain Intensity on an 11-point Scale From Baseline to 12 Weeks

Patients scored their pain intensity in the breast and/or ipsilateral arm using a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale, ranging from no pain (0) to worst pain imaginable (10). The change in pain intensity was calculated from two time points as the later time point (12 weeks) minus the earlier time point (Baseline). (NCT00686127)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
Placebo Patch4.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Radial Artery Diameter to Compare Combination of Nitroglycerin or Placebo and Lidocaine (20mg or 40mg)

Radial artery diameter was measured with ultrasonography using a high-frequency (13 MHz) linear array transducer 2 cm proximal to the radial styloid process. To compare combination of (Lidocaine + Nitroglycerin) or (Lidocaine + placebo), at visit 2, participants randomized to Comparison A received 30mg NTG + 20mg Lidocaine on one wrist, and placebo + 20mg Lidocaine on the other wrist; participants randomized to Comparison B received 30mg Nitroglycerin + 40mg Lidocaine on one wrist, and placebo + 40mg Lidocaine on the other wrist. (NCT00686231)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 120 minutes after topical application at Visit 2

,,,
Interventionpercent diameter change (Mean)
10 minutes30 minutes60 minutes120 minutes
Lidocaine 20mg + Nitroglycerin 30mg4.911.018.218.5
Lidocaine 20mg + Placebo45.38.45.7
Lidocaine 40mg + Nitroglycerin 30mg3.410.617.222.1
Lidocaine 40mg + Placebo1.62.92.54.1

[back to top]

Percent Change in Diameter of Radial Artery as a Dose Test for Nitroglycerin

Radial artery diameter was measured with ultrasonography using a high-frequency (13 MHz) linear array transducer 2 cm proximal to the radial styloid process. (NCT00686231)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 120 minutes after topical application at Visit 1

,,
Interventionpercent diameter change (Mean)
10 minutes30 minutes60 minutes120 minutes
15mg Nitroglycerin-0.20.810.28.8
30mg Nitroglycerin6.414.921.528.5
Placebo-0.82.53.35.9

[back to top]

"Number of Participants Who Answered the Question If You Experienced Pain, Was it What You Expected From the Injection Procedure? Three Hours After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds"

"Number of participants who answered No, Yes, Had no expectations or No response to the question If you experienced pain, was it what you expected from the injection procedure? three hours after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds" (NCT00716443)
Timeframe: three hours after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
NoYesHad no expectationsNo response
Compounded Topical Anesthetic Ointment829131
Pliaglis® Cream1027122

[back to top]

"Number of Participants Who Answered the Question What Level of Pain Did You Experience When You Were Injected? Three Hours After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds"

"Number of participants who answered according to a scale of None, Minimal, Mild, Moderate, Severe, or No response to the question What level of pain did you experience when you were injected? three hours after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds" (NCT00716443)
Timeframe: three hours after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
NoneMinimalMildModerateSevereNo response
Compounded Topical Anesthetic Ointment22415910
Pliaglis® Cream42315810

[back to top]

"Number of Participants With Yes/no Answers to Question to Investigator Did the Topical Anesthetics Provide Adequate Anesthesia for the Injections of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds Procedure? Day of Injection of Restylane® Into Nasolabial Folds"

"Number of participants with yes or no answers to question asked to investigator on the day of injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds Did the topical anesthetics provided adequate anesthesia for the injections of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds procedure?" (NCT00716443)
Timeframe: Day of injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
YesNo
Compounded Topical Anesthetic Ointment447
Pliaglis® Cream447

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Each Category of the Blinded Evaluator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain Scale Immediately After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds

Number of participants in each category of the Blinded Evaluator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain scale (0 = No pain; 1 = Slight pain; 2 = Moderate pain; 3 = Severe pain) immediately after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds (NCT00716443)
Timeframe: immediately after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No painSlight painModerate painSevere pain
Compounded Topical Anesthetic Ointment281841
Pliaglis® Cream351150

[back to top]

"Number of Participants Who Answered the Question Still Speaking to the Topical Anesthetic You Had on the Right/Left Side of Your Face, Would You Recommend it to Your Friend or Family Member? 3 Hours After Injection of Restylane® Into Nasolabial Folds"

"Number of participants who answered No, Yes or No response to the question Still speaking to the topical anesthetic you had on the right/left side of your face, would you recommend it to your friend or family member? three hours after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds" (NCT00716443)
Timeframe: three hours after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
NoYesNo response
Compounded Topical Anesthetic Ointment12390
Pliaglis® Cream13380

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Each Category of the Blinded Evaluator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain Scale One Hour After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds

Number of participants in each category of the Blinded Evaluator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain scale (0 = No pain; 1 = Slight pain; 2 = Moderate pain; 3 = Severe pain) one hour after an injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds (NCT00716443)
Timeframe: one hour after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No painSlight painModerate painSevere pain
Compounded Topical Anesthetic Ointment49200
Pliaglis® Cream49200

[back to top]

Subject's Pain Evaluation by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Upon First Needlestick, Immediately After Injection, One Hour After Injection and Three Hours After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds

Subject's pain as evaluated using a VAS scale from 0 - 10 cm (centimeters) with 0 cm being no pain and 10 cm being the worst pain imaginable upon first needlestick, immediately after injection, one hour after injection and three hours after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds (NCT00716443)
Timeframe: upon first needlestick, immediately after injection, one hour after injection and three hours after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds

,
Interventioncentimeters (Mean)
upon first needle stickimmediately after injectionone hour after injectionthree hours after injection
Compounded Topical Anesthetic Ointment2.82.80.60.5
Pliaglis® Cream2.32.70.80.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Each Category of the Investigator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain Scale Three Hours After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds

Number of participants in each category of the Investigator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain scale (0 = No pain; 1 = Slight pain; 2 = Moderate pain; 3 = Severe pain) three hours after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds (NCT00716443)
Timeframe: three hours after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No painMild painModerate painSevere pain
Compounded Topical Anesthetic Ointment49200
Pliaglis® Cream50100

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Each Category of the Investigator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain Scale One Hour After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds

Number of participants in each category of the Investigator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain scale (0 = No pain; 1 = Slight pain; 2 = Moderate pain; 3 = Severe pain) one hour after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds (NCT00716443)
Timeframe: one hour after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No painSlight painModerate painSevere pain
Compounded Topical Anesthetic Ointment49200
Pliaglis® Cream49200

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Each Category of the Investigator Evaluation of the Subject's Post Procedure Pain Assessment Scale Upon First Needle Stick of Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds

Number of participants in each category of the Investigator Evaluation of the Subject's Post Procedure Pain Assessment scale (0 = No pain; 1 = Slight pain; 2 = Moderate pain; 3 = Severe pain) upon first needle stick of an injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds (NCT00716443)
Timeframe: Upon first needle stick of injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No painSlight painModerate painSevere pain
Compounded Topical Anesthetic Ointment1325121
Pliaglis® Cream172860

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Each Category of the Investigator Evaluation of the Subject's Post Procedure Pain Assessment Scale Immediately After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds

Number of participants in each category of the Investigator Evaluation of the Subject's Post Procedure Pain Assessment scale (0 = No pain; 1 = Slight pain; 2 = Moderate pain; 3 = Severe pain) immediately after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds immediately after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds (NCT00716443)
Timeframe: immediately after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No painSlight painModerate painSevere pain
Compounded Topical Anesthetic Ointment291570
Pliaglis® Cream351060

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Each Category of the Blinded Evaluator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain Scale Upon First Needle Stick of Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds

Number of participants in each category of the Blinded Evaluator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain scale (0 = No pain; 1 = Slight pain; 2 = Moderate pain; 3 = Severe pain) upon first needle stick of an injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds (NCT00716443)
Timeframe: upon first needle stick of injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No painMild painModerate painSevere pain
Compounded Topical Anesthetic Ointment929130
Pliaglis® Cream143160

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Each Category of the Blinded Evaluator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain Scale Three Hours After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds

Number of participants in each category of the Blinded Evaluator's Evaluation of Subject's Pain scale (0 = No pain; 1 = Slight pain; 2 = Moderate pain; 3 = Severe pain) three hours after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds (NCT00716443)
Timeframe: three hours after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No painMild painModerate painSevere pain
Compounded Topical Anesthetic Ointment50100
Pliaglis® Cream50100

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Tolerability Assessments Resulting in Adverse Events From Baseline to Two Days After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds

Number of participants w/ tolerability assessments (erythema, edema, blanching) resulting in adverse events from Baseline to two days after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds (NCT00716443)
Timeframe: Baseline to two days after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pliaglis® Cream0
Compounded Topical Anesthetic Ointment0

[back to top]

"Number of Participants Who Answered the Question If it Was Different Than What You Expected, Was it? Three Hours After Injection of Restylane® Into the Nasolabial Folds"

"Number of participants who answered the question If it was different than what you expected, was it? (More pain, Less pain or No response) three hours after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds" (NCT00716443)
Timeframe: three hours after injection of Restylane® into the nasolabial folds

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
More painLess painNo response
Compounded Topical Anesthetic Ointment91428
Pliaglis® Cream101427

[back to top]

Time From the End of Surgery to Readiness for Hospital Discharge.

(NCT00720330)
Timeframe: Until hospital discharge, assessed up to 6 months

Interventionhours (Mean)
Ropivacaine2.2
Lidocaine/Ketamine3.8
Placebo3.0

[back to top]

Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents

The cumulative opioid consumption after surgery until the end of second postoperative day. (NCT00720330)
Timeframe: 2 days after surgery

Interventionmg (Mean)
Ropivacaine564
Lidocaine/Ketamine73
Placebo1381

[back to top]

Pre- and Intra-operative Opioid Consumption in Fentanyl Equivalents

The cumulative opioid consumption is calculated as fentanyl equivalent (NCT00720330)
Timeframe: From admission to the end of surgery

Interventionmcg (Mean)
Ropivacaine100
Lidocaine/Ketamine113
Placebo134

[back to top]

Pain Scores on Numerical Rating Scale

Numerical Rating Scales is a measurement of pain ranging from 0 to 10 (11 point scale), where 0 is equal to no pain and 10 is equal to worst possible pain. Pain scores were measured in PACU, first and second postoperative mornings. (NCT00720330)
Timeframe: After surgery until the second postoperative mornings.

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PACUPOD1POD2
Lidocaine/Ketamine2.03.32.8
Placebo6.33.72
Ropivacaine0.84.62.6

[back to top]

Postoperative Nausea

Number of patients who had postoperative nausea or vomiting were recorded. (NCT00720330)
Timeframe: After surgery until the second postoperative day.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ropivacaine2
Lidocaine/Ketamine1
Placebo0

[back to top]

Total Opioid Consumption at PACU Admission and Discharge as Well as Mornings of Postoperative Days 1 and 2

(NCT00721110)
Timeframe: intraoperative through postoperative day 2

,,,
Interventionmilligram morphine sulfate equivalents (Median)
intraoperativepostoperative care unitpostoperative day 1postoperative day 2
Ketamine2020219
Lidocaine20202310
Nonketamine2323238
Nonlidocaine2023226

[back to top]

Presence of Nausea and Vomiting After Two Hours in the PACU and the First Postoperative Day

(NCT00721110)
Timeframe: 2 hours after surgery, on postoperative day 1

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Nausea, PACUNausea, POD 1Vomiting, PACUVomiting, POD 1
Ketamine30531023
Lidocaine3255623
Nonketamine28501616
Nonlidocaine26481916

[back to top]

Verbal Response Fatigue Score on Postoperative Day 1

Verbal response fatigue score on postoperative day 1. Verbal response fatigue score measured on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 is no fatigue and 10 is the worst possible fatigue. (NCT00721110)
Timeframe: postoperative day 1

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine7.2
Nonlidocaine7.2
Ketamine7.4
Nonketamine7.0

[back to top]

The Effects of Lidocaine and Ketamine on Functional Recovery Assessed by 6 Minute Walk Test on Postoperative Day Two

The effects of lidocaine and ketamine on functional recovery assessed by 6 minute walk test on postoperative day two after hysterectomy. This outcome measures return to ambulation after surgery. (NCT00721110)
Timeframe: postoperative day 2

Interventionmeters (Mean)
Lidocaine202
Nonlidocaine202
Ketamine193
Nonketamine210

[back to top]

Verbal Response Pain Scores (VRS) at PACU Admission and Discharge as Well as Mornings and Afternoons of Postoperative Days 1 and 2

Verbal response pain scores (VRS) at PACU admission and discharge as well as mornings and afternoons of postoperative days 1 and 2. VRS scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 denoting no pain and 10 denoting worst possible pain. (NCT00721110)
Timeframe: PACU admission and discharge, postoperative mornings and afternoons on days 1 and 2

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PACU admitPACU dischargePOD 1POD 2
Ketamine6.44.63.73.1
Lidocaine6.24.04.03.1
Nonketamine6.94.33.62.8
Nonlidocaine7.14.93.32.9

[back to top]

Present Pain Intensity

Present pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). This is scored between 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). (NCT00725504)
Timeframe: Patients completed the VAS of present pain intensity immediately before and immediately after placebo and during each infusion level

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline6.25
Placebo5.64
Lidocaine 3 µg/ml4.92
Lidocaine 5 µg/ml4.18

[back to top]

Discomfort Associated With the Intravitreal Injection

Discomfort Associated With the Intravitreal Injection using a Subjective Analog Pain Scale (0-10); no pain (0) and severe pain (10) (NCT00769392)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine 4%Lidocaine 2% Injectable SolutionProparacaine OphthalmicTetracaine Ophthalmic
All Participants32.32.83.1

[back to top]

Discomfort From Anesthesia Used Prior to Intravitreal Injections

Discomfort from Anesthesia used prior to Intravitreal Injections using a Subjective Analog Pain Scale (0-10); no pain (0) and severe pain (10). (NCT00769392)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine 4%Lidocaine 2% Injectable SolutionProparacaine OphthalmicTetracaine Ophthalmic
All Participants1.41.60.71.0

[back to top]

Maximal Pain/Discomfort

"FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) Pain assessment scale was administered by a trained observer. The patient's parent documented maximum distress using a 100-mm visual analog scale where 0 represented no pain and 100 (the furthest point to the left) represented the worst pain ever." (NCT00786916)
Timeframe: during initial 3 minute propofol infusion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Group A4.7
Group B4.3
Group C5.0

[back to top]

Visual Analogue Scale(0-100mm) by the Subject.

visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the post-intubation sore throat. The VAS was a well-recongnized standard tool for rating of pain. The VAS measures exactly 100 mm. 0 means no pain and 100 means the worst pain that one can image. Patient marks a point on the line that matches the amount of pain he or she feels. (NCT00798018)
Timeframe: 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours after extubation

,,,
Interventionmm (Mean)
6h12h24h48h
Air Alone51504345
Lidocaine22252023
Normal Saline40384143
Tetracaine91379

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Extended Release Epidural Morphine (EREM)

The primary end point was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles of EREM after either no epidural lidocaine or after an epidural lidocaine top-up for cesarean delivery. (NCT00804609)
Timeframe: a plasma sample at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes, and 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Epidural DepoDur Following Epidural Lidocaine Administration11.1
Epidural DepoDur Following Spinal Anesthetic8.3

[back to top]

Assessment of Pain on a 10-point Visual Analog Pain Scale During the Procedure.

This used a visual analog scale from 0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum) that was measured as centimeters. A higher score would indicate more pain, therefore, a worse outcome. Pain was assessed at each step that could potentially elicit pain, specifically when there was direct physical manipulation. (NCT00811187)
Timeframe: During Procedure

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine Group4.15
Saline Placebo Group3.38

[back to top]

Pain Score, as Assessed Using a 10 cm Linear Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

VAS on a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being lowest pain and 10 highest amount of pain (NCT00816751)
Timeframe: at completion of procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paracervical Block4.25
Intracervical Block3.97

[back to top]

Gestational Age at Time of Procedure

(NCT00816751)
Timeframe: At the time of the procedure

InterventionDays (Mean)
Paracervical Block51
Intracervical Block54

[back to top]

No Pain on Three Point Likert Scale on Dorsiflexion of Wrist

"Percentage of patients reporting no pain on dorsiflexion of wrist on a three-point Likert scale on dorsiflexion of wrist. Scale: No pain - some pain - definite pain." (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy36
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy3
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment8

[back to top]

No Pain on Three Point Likert Scale on Isometric Extension of Third Finger

"Percentage of patients reporting no pain on isometric extension of third finger on a three-point Likert scale on dorsiflexion of wrist. Scale: No pain - some pain - definite pain." (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy36
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy24
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment22

[back to top]

No Pain on Three Point Likert Scale on Isometric Extension of Third Finger

"Percentage of patients reporting no pain on isometric extension of third finger on a three-point Likert scale on dorsiflexion of wrist. Scale: No pain - some pain - definite pain." (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy31
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy53
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment58

[back to top]

No Pain on Three Point Likert Scale on Isometric Extension of Third Finger

"Percentage of patients reporting no pain on isometric extension of third finger on a three-point Likert scale on dorsiflexion of wrist. Scale: No pain - some pain - definite pain." (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy53
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy76
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment63

[back to top]

No Pain on Three Point Likert Scale on Isometric Extension of Third Finger

"Percentage of patients reporting no pain on isometric extension of third finger on a three-point Likert scale on dorsiflexion of wrist. Scale: No pain - some pain - definite pain." (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy44
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy16
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment17

[back to top]

Overall Complaint on 100 mm VAS-scale as Recorded by the Study Doctors

Overall complaint registered on VAS-scale as recorded by study doctors. 0 mm represents no overall complaint. 100 mm signifies maximum overall complaint. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionmm (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy43
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy35
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment36

[back to top]

Overall Complaint on 100 mm VAS-scale as Recorded by the Study Doctors

Overall complaint registered on VAS-scale as recorded by study doctors. 0 mm represents no overall complaint. 100 mm signifies maximum overall complaint. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionmm (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy36
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy19
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment18

[back to top]

Overall Complaint on 100 mm VAS-scale as Recorded by the Study Doctors

Overall complaint registered on VAS-scale as recorded by study doctors. 0 mm represents no overall complaint. 100 mm signifies maximum overall complaint. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionmm (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy20
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy9
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment12

[back to top]

Overall Complaint on 100 mm VAS-scale as Recorded by the Study Doctors

Overall complaint registered on VAS-scale as recorded by study doctors. 0 mm represents no overall complaint. 100 mm signifies maximum overall complaint. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionmm (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy32
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy50
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment51

[back to top]

Pain as Recorded by the Study Doctors on a 100 mm VAS-scale

Pain in elbow as recorded by the study doctors on a 100 mm VAS-scale (Visual Analog Scale). The scale runs from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (maximum pain), higher scores means worse outcome. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionmm (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy19
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy9
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment13

[back to top]

Pain as Recorded by the Study Doctors on a 100 mm VAS-scale (Visual Analog Scale).

Pain in elbow as recorded by the study doctors on a 100 mm VAS-scale (Visual Analog Scale). The scale runs from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (maximum pain), higher scores means worse outcome. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionmm (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy41
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy33
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment33

[back to top]

Pain as Recorded by the Study Doctors on a 100 mm VAS-scale (Visual Analog Scale).

Pain in elbow as recorded by the study doctors on a 100 mm VAS-scale (Visual Analog Scale). The scale runs from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (maximum pain), higher scores means worse outcome. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionmm (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy38
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy21
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment19

[back to top]

Pain as Recorded by the Study Doctors on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS Scale)

Pain in elbow as recorded by the study doctors on a 100 mm VAS-scale (Visual Analog Scale). The scale runs from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (maximum pain), higher scores means worse outcome. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionmm (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy29
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy45
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment44

[back to top]

Pain Free Function Index of Everyday Activities

Pain free function Index ( 0 - 8 ; 0: full function, 8 no function). Does the patient have pain on 8 every-day activities (dressing, eating, washing, household tasks, opening doors, carrying objects, with work, at sports). Recording a 0 on a complaint listed signifies full function, recording a 1 signifies no function. Thus the more activities with no function the higher score and the higher impairment. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy3.42
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy3.62
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment3.37

[back to top]

Pain Free Function Index of Everyday Activities

Pain free function Index ( 0 - 8 ; 0: full function, 8 no function). Does the patient have pain on 8 every-day activities (dressing, eating, washing, household tasks, opening doors, carrying objects, with work, at sports). Recording a 0 on a complaint listed signifies full function, recording a 1 signifies no function. Thus the more activities with no function the higher score and the higher impairment. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy2.97
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy1.83
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment2.00

[back to top]

Pain Free Function Index of Everyday Activities

Pain free function Index ( 0 - 8 ; 0: full function, 8 no function). Does the patient have pain on 8 every-day activities (dressing, eating, washing, household tasks, opening doors, carrying objects, with work, at sports). Recording a 0 on a complaint listed signifies full function, recording a 1 signifies no function. Thus the more activities with no function the higher score and the higher impairment. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy1.64
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy1.03
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment1.40

[back to top]

Pain Free Function Index of Everyday Activities

Pain free function Index ( 0 - 8 ; 0: full function, 8 no function). Does the patient have pain on 8 every-day activities (dressing, eating, washing, household tasks, opening doors, carrying objects, with work, at sports). Recording a 0 on a complaint listed signifies full function, recording a 1 signifies no function. Thus the more activities with no function the higher score and the higher impairment. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy2.78
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy4.40
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment4.82

[back to top]

Affected Function on 100 mm VAS-scale as Recorded by the Study Doctors

To what extent is the use of the elbow affected registered on 100 mm VAS-scale. 0 mm represents use not affected. 100 mm signifies maximum affected function. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionmm (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy28
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy17
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment16

[back to top]

Pain-free Grip Strength Ratio

Pain free grip strength registered with hand held dynamometer 30 31. Mean of three measurements as ratio of affected to unaffected side. Strength registered in kg. A ratio closer to zero signifies that pain occurs at the application of a small force signifying a more severe condition. A ratio approaching 1 signifies a milder complaint. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionRatio x 100 (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy64
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy55
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment63

[back to top]

Pain-free Grip Strength Ratio

Pain free grip strength registered with hand held dynamometer 30 31. Mean of three measurements as ratio of affected to unaffected side.Strength registered in kg. A ratio closer to zero signifies that pain occurs at the application of a small force signifying a more severe condition. A ratio approaching 1 signifies a milder complaint. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionRatio x 100 (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy82
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy76
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment74

[back to top]

Pain-free Grip Strength Ratio

Pain free grip strength registered with hand held dynamometer 30 31. Mean of three measurements as ratio of affected to unaffected side.Strength registered in kg. A ratio closer to zero signifies that pain occurs at the application of a small force signifying a more severe condition. A ratio approaching 1 signifies a milder complaint. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

InterventionRatio x 100 (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy100
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy90
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment91

[back to top]

Treatment Success - Event Rates in Each Group

Unadjusted event rates of treatment success, defined as participants rating themselves 'much improved' or 'completely recovered' on a six point scale. Percentage with 99% confidence interval. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 6 - 52 weeks

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6 weeks12 weeks26 weeks52 weeks
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment15486778
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy59424275
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy24456978

[back to top]

Affected Function on 100 mm VAS-scale as Recorded by the Study Doctors

To what extent is the use of the elbow affected registered on 100 mm VAS-scale. 0 mm represents use not affected. 100 mm signifies maximum affected function. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionmm (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy37
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy32
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment34

[back to top]

Affected Function on 100 mm VAS-scale as Recorded by the Study Doctors

To what extent is the use of the elbow affected registered on 100 mm VAS-scale. 0 mm represents use not affected. 100 mm signifies maximum affected function. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionmm (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy25
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy45
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment38

[back to top]

Affected Function on a 100 mm VAS-scale as Recorded by the Study Doctors

To what extent is the use of the elbow affected registered on 100 mm VAS-scale. 0 mm represents use not affected. 100 mm signifies maximum affected function. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionmm (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy16
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy9
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment10

[back to top]

Maximum Grip Strength Ratio

Maximum grip strength registered with hand held dynamometer. Mean of three measurements as ratio of affected to unaffected side. Strength registered in kg. A ratio closer to zero signifies that pain hampers the application of grip force to a larger degree signifying a more severe condition. A ratio approaching 1 signifies a milder complaint where grip strength is not hampered by pain. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionRatio x 100 (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy83
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy88
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment89

[back to top]

Maximum Grip Strength Ratio

Maximum grip strength registered with hand held dynamometer. Mean of three measurements as ratio of affected to unaffected side. Strength registered in kg. A ratio closer to zero signifies that pain hampers the application of grip force to a larger degree signifying a more severe condition. A ratio approaching 1 signifies a milder complaint where grip strength is not hampered by pain. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionRatio x 100 (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy89
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy99
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment99

[back to top]

Maximum Grip Strength Ratio

Maximum grip strength registered with hand held dynamometer. Mean of three measurements as ratio of affected to unaffected side. Strength registered in kg. A ratio closer to zero signifies that pain hampers the application of grip force to a larger degree signifying a more severe condition. A ratio approaching 1 signifies a milder complaint where grip strength is not hampered by pain. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionRatio x 100 (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy87
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy80
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment74

[back to top]

Maximum Grip Strength Ratio

Maximum grip strength registered with hand held dynamometer. Mean of three measurements as ratio of affected to unaffected side.Strength registered in kg. A ratio closer to zero signifies that pain hampers the application of grip force to a larger degree signifying a more severe condition. A ratio approaching 1 signifies a milder complaint where grip strength is not hampered by pain. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

InterventionRatio x 100 (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy96
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy102
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment104

[back to top]

Pain-free Grip Strength Ratio

Pain free grip strength registered with hand held dynamometer . Mean of three measurements as ratio of affected to unaffected side.Strength registered in kg. A ratio closer to zero signifies that pain occurs at the application of a small force signifying a more severe condition. A ratio approaching 1 signifies a milder complaint. (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionRatio x 100 (Mean)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy58
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy50
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment57

[back to top]

No Pain on Three Point Likert Scale on Dorsiflexion of Wrist

"Percentage of patients reporting no pain on dorsiflexion of wrist on a three-point Likert scale on dorsiflexion of wrist. Scale: No pain - some pain - definite pain." (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy22
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy12
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment17

[back to top]

No Pain on Three Point Likert Scale on Dorsiflexion of Wrist

"Percentage of patients reporting no pain on dorsiflexion of wrist on a three-point Likert scale on dorsiflexion of wrist. Scale: No pain - some pain - definite pain." (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy19
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy29
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment38

[back to top]

No Pain on Three Point Likert Scale on Dorsiflexion of Wrist

"Percentage of patients reporting no pain on dorsiflexion of wrist on a three-point Likert scale on dorsiflexion of wrist. Scale: No pain - some pain - definite pain." (NCT00826462)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Corticosteroid Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy36
Placebo Injection in Combination With Physical Therapy60
Control Group: Wait-and-see Treatment50

[back to top]

Change in Ln(Bacterial Colony Count) From Pre-antibiotic Administration to Post Study Medication Swabs

Within 3 hours from time of culture acquisition, the samples will be vortexed for 30 seconds and 100µl aliquots will be plated onto 5% sheep blood and chocolate agar plates. These plates will be incubated with 5% carbon dioxide at 35˚ C for 72 hours. After 72 hours all plates will be read for colony count and identification of all isolates will be performed using routine microbiological methods. The natural log of bacterial bacterial colony count will be used for the outcome measure. (NCT00827073)
Timeframe: (1) Pre-antibiotics swab, and (2) Post-study medication (pre surgery)

InterventionLn(bacterial colony count) (Mean)
Tetracaine 0.5% Drop-0.14
Lidocaine 2% Jelly-0.52

[back to top]

Number of Bacterial Species in Pre-antibiotic Administration and in Post Study Medication Swabs

(NCT00827073)
Timeframe: (1) Pre-antibiotics swab and (2) Post-study medication (pre surgery)

,
Interventionbacterial spceies (Mean)
pre number of bacterial spicespost surgery number of bacterial speices
Lidocaine 2% Jelly11
Tetracaine 0.5% Drop11

[back to top]

Mean Pain Scores

The pain score as measured by verbal response scores (scale ranging from 0 to 10 with 0=no pain; 10=worst pain) every 30 minutes during post anesthesia care unit stay, then per nursing floor protocol (roughly every 4-6 hours). (NCT00840996)
Timeframe: From admission to the post anesthesia care unit through postoperative day 2 (or discharge, if earlier).

Interventionverbal response scores (Mean)
Lidocaine4.4
Placebo5.3

[back to top]

Opioid Medication Requirement, mg in IV Morphine Equivalent

Opioid consumption during the initial 48 postoperative hours was converted to IV morphine sulfate equivalents (NCT00840996)
Timeframe: through postoperative day 2 (or discharge, if earlier)

Interventionmg IV morphine equivalent (Mean)
Lidocaine55
Placebo74

[back to top]

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)will be noted during day one and day two postoperative. (NCT00840996)
Timeframe: post op day one and two or till hospital discharge

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
NauseaVomiting
Lidocaine42
Placebo81

[back to top]

Duration of Hospitalization

Length of hospital stay will be recorded in days. (NCT00840996)
Timeframe: At discharge

Interventiondays (Median)
Lidocaine3
Placebo3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Major 30-day Post Operative Complications

The occurrence in an individual of one or more the following major complications, including pneumonia, respiratory failure, prolonged use or need for reinsertion of chest tube, cardiac arrest, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, stroke, intravascular coagulopathy, thromboembolic disease (pulmonary embolism), injury to great vessels, delirium, monoplegia or paraplegia, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, gastrointestinal block, ureteral obstruction, syndrome of inappropriate antidiruretic hormone secretion, wound infection requiring debridement, sepsis, and readmission. (NCT00840996)
Timeframe: 30 days after surgery

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lidocaine2
Placebo5

[back to top]

12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Physical Health Composite Score

Physical health composite score ranges from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health. (NCT00840996)
Timeframe: 90 days post operative

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Lidocaine39
Placebo34

[back to top]

12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Physical Health Composite Score

Physical health composite score ranges from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health. (NCT00840996)
Timeframe: 30 days post operative

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Lidocaine38
Placebo33

[back to top]

Investigator Assessment of Improvement Since Baseline in Nasolabial Fold (NLF) Severity

Investigator determination of improvement in NLF severity score on 5-point NLF Severity Scale (0 = None; 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Severe; 4 = Extreme) two weeks after treatment with Juvéderm with Lidocaine in one NLF and Restylane in the other NLF (NCT00850889)
Timeframe: Day 0, Day 14

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Juvederm(R) Ultra Injectable Gel With Lidocaine1.4
Restylane(R) Injectable Gel1.3

[back to top]

Procedural Pain Score

Subjects evaluated the pain associated with the procedure on an 11-point scale, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (NCT00850889)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Juvederm(R) Ultra Injectable Gel With Lidocaine2.0
Restylane(R) Injectable Gel4.1

[back to top]

Subject Assessment of Improvement From Baseline in Nasolabial Fold (NLF) Severity

Subject determination of improvement in NLF severity score on 5-point NLF Severity Scale (0 = None; 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Severe; 4 = Extreme) two weeks after treatment with Juvéderm with Lidocaine in one NLF and Restylane in the other NLF (NCT00850889)
Timeframe: Day 0, Day 14

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Juvederm(R) Ultra Injectable Gel With Lidocaine1.5
Restylane(R) Injectable Gel1.4

[back to top]

Comparative Pain

A 5-point scale (-2 = Juvéderm with Lidocaine less painful than Restylane; -1 = Juvéderm with Lidocaine slightly less painful than Restylane; 0 = No difference; 1 = Juvéderm with Lidocaine slightly more painful than Restylane; 2 = Juvéderm with Lidocaine more painful than Restylane). Subjects selected one category from the scale; the percentage of subjects that selected each category is presented. (NCT00850889)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Juvederm with Lidocaine less painful than RestylanJuvederm with Lidocaine slightly less painful thanNo differenceJuvederm with Lidocaine slightly more painful thanJuvederm with Lidocaine more painful than Restylan
Total Study Participants3450393

[back to top]

Verbal Pain Score

11 point verbal pain score (VPS) 0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain (NCT00864682)
Timeframe: Immediately after injection of study drug. One time assessment.

InterventionUnits on a scale (Median)
Control Arm3
Lidocaine / Propofol Admixture Arm0
Lidocaine Pretreatment Arm0

[back to top]

Complete Alleviation of Injection Pain

Total subjects within the arm versus those subjects who had no pain with injection (VPS=0) (NCT00864682)
Timeframe: Immediately after injection of study drug. One time assessment

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Control Arm14
Lidocaine / Propofol Admixture Arm28
Lidocaine Pretreatment Arm40

[back to top]

Satisfaction With Anesthetic Technique

Were you satisfied with the anesthetic technique? Yes/No (NCT00864682)
Timeframe: Prior to discharge. One time assessment

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
YesNo
Control Arm428
Lidocaine / Propofol Admixture Arm482
Lidocaine Pretreatment Arm510

[back to top]

Patient's Perception of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Visual Scale: 0 - no Pain; 5 - Worst Imaginable Pain

A sterile catheter lubricated with the allocated gel was placed transurethrally into the bladder to measure the postvoid residual volume. After removal of the catheter, a cotton swab, coated with the same allocated gel, was advanced to the urethrovesical junction until resistance was felt. The angle of the swab with the horizontal plane was measured at rest and with a Valsalva maneuver. Immediately following the Q-tip test, the patient's perception of pain level was measured by Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale, a visual scale where 0 represents no pain and 5 represents worst imaginable pain. (NCT00883103)
Timeframe: Immediately after the examination

InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Lidocaine1
Aqueous Gel2

[back to top]

Safety of the Sling.

Safety of the sling was assessed with a record of perioperative and postoperative complications. The following are all the complications experienced with the TVT-SECUR for each technique, the 'Hammock' technique and the 'U-Method'. (NCT00904618)
Timeframe: 15 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Perioperative urethral lacerationPostoperative vaginal erosionsPostoperative transient urinary retention
'Hammock' Technique060
U-Method102

[back to top]

Local Anesthesia Satisfaction

Local anesthesia satisfaction was assessed with a questionnaire completed by the patients. The patients were asked if they would recommend this type of anesthesia (yes or no). (NCT00904618)
Timeframe: Questionnaire filled 1 week after surgery

Interventionparticipants (Number)
YesNo
TVT-SECUR433

[back to top]

Improvement in Stress Urinary Symptoms.

A questionnaire with a Likert scale from one to five was used to assess the improvement in stress urinary symptoms at six months for each technique, the 'Hammock' technique and the 'U-Method' (1-Worst, 2-Same, 3-Improved, 4-Almost cured, 5-Cured). Patients had to answer 3 or more on the scale to be considered improved. (NCT00904618)
Timeframe: Six months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ImprovedNot improved
'Hammock' Technique115
U-Method220

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Post Operative Ileus

(NCT00913003)
Timeframe: 7 days

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo0
Lidocaine0

[back to top]

24 Hour Hydromorphone

Total IV hydromorphone administered during surgery to 24 hours post surgery (NCT00913003)
Timeframe: 24 hour

Interventionmiligrams (Mean)
Placebo2.33
Lidocaine1.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Post Operative Nausea

Nausea at any time during the post operative period for 48 hours (NCT00913003)
Timeframe: Immediate post operative to 48 hours

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo11
Lidocaine11

[back to top]

Total Milligrams of Opiates

mean number of milligrams used postoperatively (NCT00913068)
Timeframe: 2, 6,12, 24, 48 and 72 hours

Interventionmg (Mean)
TAP Arm5.15
Standard Post Operative Pain Control2.52

[back to top]

Mean Number of Days With Acute Medication Use

"Acute medication use meant the consumption of a drug to abort or terminate a headache." (NCT00915473)
Timeframe: 4 weeks post-injection

Interventiondays per 4 weeks (Mean)
Active Injection6.7
Placebo Injection7.7

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With at Least 50% Reduction in the Frequency of Days With Moderate or Severe Migraine in the 4 Week Post Injection Compared to the 4 Week Pre-injection Baseline Period

The baseline frequency will be the number of calendar days with moderate or severe migraine during the 4 week period prior to injection, and the follow-up frequency will be the number of calendar days with migraine during the 4 week period following injection. (NCT00915473)
Timeframe: 4 weeks pre-injection baseline, 4 weeks post-injection

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Active Injection10
Placebo Injection9

[back to top]

Mean Frequency of Days With a Migraine

(NCT00915473)
Timeframe: 4 weeks post-injection

,
Interventiondays per 4 weeks (Mean)
SevereAt Least ModerateAt Least Mild
Active Injection3.47.09.3
Placebo Injection2.97.810.4

[back to top]

Mean Number of Hours With Moderate or Severe Migraine

(NCT00915473)
Timeframe: 4 weeks post-injection

Interventionhours per 4 weeks (Mean)
Active Injection60
Placebo Injection58

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameters Based on Plasma Concentration of Lidocaine and MEGX in Nanograms/Milliliter.

Plasma concentration of lidocaine and MEGX in nanograms/milliliter were measured prior to one-time application of 4% lidocaine gel on the skin of the breasts and chest wall as recommended for use as as pre-medication to reduce discomfort during screening mammography, and at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours. Due to the high frequency of nondetectable values, pharmacokinetic parameters could not be estimated. Measurements at all time points were grouped together to select a median. (NCT00925353)
Timeframe: Prior to gel application, and at 30 min, 60 min, and 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours after

Interventionnanograms/mililiter (Median)
lidocaineMEGX
Lidocaine Gel GroupNANA

[back to top]

Assessment of Immediate Post-injection Pain Severity by Investigator

Investigators assessment of immediate post-injection pain severity using Thermometer Pain Scale (TPS) with a range of 0-10 where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain (NCT00929071)
Timeframe: immediate post injection

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pain Assessment for Evolence/Topical Anesthetic5.2
Pain Assessment for Evolence/Lidocaine2.0

[back to top]

Assessment of Immediate Post-injection Pain Severity by Subject

Subjects assessment of immediate post-injection pain severity using a visual analogue scale (VAS) 100 mm in length, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100). (NCT00929071)
Timeframe: immediate post-injection

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pain Assessment for Evolence/Topical Anesthetic6.3
Pain Assessment for Evolence/Lidocaine2.0

[back to top]

Change in Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)

The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): The SF-36 was designed to measure general health status. Two scales were used: Work Activities (four items) and General Health (one item). For the work activities scale, the reported score was the sum of four questions, each with values ranging from 1 to 4, the total score could range from 4 to 16. A higher score on Work Activities indicates more health-related problems For the general health question, the patients ranked their health from Excellent (1) to poor (5), the scale ranged from 1 to 5 with 1 being best health and 5 being worst. A high score in General Health indicates poorer health state. (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 6-weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
6-Week Change Work activities6-Week Change General health perception
Lidocaine2.71-0.004
Placebo3-0.03

[back to top]

Count of Participants With a Decline of Greater Than or Equal to One Standard Deviation in One or More of Five Cognitive Domain Scores Reported as a Dichotomous Post-operative Cognitive Deficit (POCD) Outcome

To characterize cognitive function over time, while minimizing potential redundancy in the cognitive measures, a factor analysis was performed on the 14 cognitive test scores from baseline. We chose a five-factor solution, which represents 5 cognitive domains: structured verbal memory, unstructured verbal memory, executive function, visual memory and attention/concentration. Each domain score is normally distributed with a mean of zero. A change score was calculated for each domain by subtracting the baseline from the 6-week score. A dichotomous outcome variable of post-operative cognitive deficit was defined as a decline of ≥1 standard deviation in 1 or more of the 5 domains. (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: Preoperative to 6 weeks after surgery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lidocaine87
Placebo83

[back to top]

Transcerebral Activation Gradients of Monocytes

Paired jugular venous and radial arterial blood samples were drawn at baseline, cross-clamp removal, end of cardiopulmonary bypass, and 6 hours post cross-clamp removalime points and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify activated platelets. Transcerebral activation gradients were calculated by subtracting arterial values from venous values and were compared between groups (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 hours post cross-clamp removal

,
InterventionMean linear fluorescence intensity-MLFI (Mean)
BaselineCross-clamp removalEnd of Bypass6 hours post cross-clamp removal
Lidocaine-4.22-2.46-0.341.21
Placebo-0.041.832.640.54

[back to top]

Transcerebral Activation Gradient of Platelet-neutrophil Conjugates

Paired jugular venous and radial arterial blood samples were drawn at baseline, cross-clamp removal, end of cardiopulmonary bypass, and 6 hours post cross-clamp removalime points and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify activated platelets. Transcerebral activation gradients were calculated by subtracting arterial values from venous values and were compared between groups (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 hours post cross-clamp removal

,
InterventionMean linear fluorescence intensity-MLFI (Mean)
BaselineCross-clamp removalEnd of Bypass6 hours post cross-clamp removal
Lidocaine-0.150.02-0.73-0.10
Placebo-0.43-0.73-0.400.19

[back to top]

Change in the Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS-IADL)

"Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS-IADL): This measure contains six items that assess the ability to perform important tasks for daily living (e.g., Could you prepare your own meals? Could you drive a car?). Scores range from 6 to 24. Higher scores indicate increasing difficulty in engaging in daily activities." (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 6-weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine2.46
Placebo2.1

[back to top]

Change in Social Activity

"Social Activity: This measure consisted of eight items that indicate the degree of social interaction. Sample items are How often do you talk on the telephone with friends and relatives? and How often do you attend meetings of social groups, clubs, or civic organizations? Scores range from 8 to 32. A lower score indicates more social activity." (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 6-weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine0.95
Placebo1.59

[back to top]

Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)

"Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). The CES-D is a 20-item self-report examination designed to measure symptoms of depression. Subjects rate the degree to which they have experienced a range of symptoms of depression, such as I had crying spells and I felt lonely. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptoms. Scores greater than 16 are typically considered indicative of clinically significant depression." (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 1-year

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine-1.27
Placebo-0.89

[back to top]

Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)

"Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). The CES-D is a 20-item self-report examination designed to measure symptoms of depression. Subjects rate the degree to which they have experienced a range of symptoms of depression, such as I had crying spells and I felt lonely. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptoms. Scores greater than 16 are typically considered indicative of clinically significant depression." (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 6-weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine0.57
Placebo0.16

[back to top]

Change in Cognitive Function From Baseline

To characterize cognitive function over time, while minimizing potential redundancy in the cognitive measures, a factor analysis was performed on the 14 cognitive test scores from baseline. We chose a five-factor solution, which represents 5 cognitive domains: structured verbal memory, unstructured verbal memory, executive function, visual memory and attention/concentration. To quantify overall cognitive function, a baseline cognitive index was first calculated as the mean of the 5 preoperative domain scores. The cognitive index score has a mean of zero, thus any positive score is above the mean, any negative score is below the mean. A continuous change score was then calculated by subtracting the baseline from the 1 year cognitive index. The resulting outcome measure is unbounded with standard deviation of 0.35. A negative change score indicating decline and a positive score indicating improvement (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: 1 year after surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine0.09
Placebo0.07

[back to top]

Change in Cognitive Function From Baseline Characterized as Continuous Cognitive Change

To characterize cognitive function over time, while minimizing potential redundancy in the cognitive measures, a factor analysis was performed on the 14 cognitive test scores from baseline. We chose a five-factor solution, which represents 5 cognitive domains: structured verbal memory, unstructured verbal memory, executive function, visual memory and attention/concentration. To quantify overall cognitive function, a baseline cognitive index was first calculated as the mean of the 5 preoperative domain scores. The cognitive index score has a mean of zero, thus any positive score is above the mean, any negative score is below the mean. A continuous change score was then calculated by subtracting the baseline from the 6-week cognitive index. The resulting outcome measure is unbounded with standard deviation of 0.35. A negative change score indicating decline and a positive score indicating improvement. (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: Preoperative to 6 weeks after surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine0.07
Placebo0.07

[back to top]

Transcerebral Activation Gradients of Neutrophils

Paired jugular venous and radial arterial blood samples were drawn at baseline, cross-clamp removal, end of cardiopulmonary bypass, and 6 hours post cross-clamp removal and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify activated platelets. Transcerebral activation gradients were calculated by subtracting arterial values from venous values and were compared between groups (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 hours post cross-clamp removal

,
InterventionMean linear fluorescence intensity-MLFI (Mean)
BaselineCross-clamp removalEnd of Bypass6 hours post cross-clamp removal
Lidocaine-2.020.560.581.04
Placebo-0.080.171.19-0.68

[back to top]

Change in Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)

The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): The SF-36 was designed to measure general health status. Two scales were used: Work Activities (four items) and General Health (one item). For the work activities scale, the reported score was the sum of four questions, each with values ranging from 1 to 4, the total score could range from 4 to 16. A higher score on Work Activities indicates more health-related problems For the general health question, the patients ranked their health from Excellent (1) to poor (5), the scale ranged from 1 to 5 with 1 being best health and 5 being worst. A high score in General Health indicates poorer health state. (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 1-year

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
1 year Change Work Activities1 year Change General health perception
Lidocaine-1.37-0.28
Placebo-1.42-0.43

[back to top]

Change in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI)

"The DASI is a 12-item scale of functional capacity that has been found to correlate well with objective measures of maximal exercise capacity. Items reflect activities of personal care, ambulation, household tasks, sexual function, and recreational activities. Activities done with no difficulty receive scores, which are weighted and summed, for a quantitative measure of functional status. Scores range from 0 to 60; a higher-weighted score indicates better function." (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 1-year

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine6.3
Placebo6.96

[back to top]

Change in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI)

"The DASI is a 12-item scale of functional capacity that has been found to correlate well with objective measures of maximal exercise capacity. Items reflect activities of personal care, ambulation, household tasks, sexual function, and recreational activities. Activities done with no difficulty receive scores, which are weighted and summed, for a quantitative measure of functional status. Scores range from 0 to 60; a higher-weighted score indicates better function." (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 6-weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine-10.98
Placebo-11.67

[back to top]

Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)

The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute cerebral infarction on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained observer rates the patent's ability to answer questions and perform activities. Ratings for each item are scored with 3 to 5 grades with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable items. The range of scores is from 0 (normal) to 42 (profound effect of stroke on patient). (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 1-year

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine0.05
Placebo0.07

[back to top]

Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)

The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute cerebral infarction on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained observer rates the patent's ability to answer questions and perform activities. Ratings for each item are scored with 3 to 5 grades with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable items. The range of scores is from 0 (normal) to 42 (profound effect of stroke on patient). (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 6-weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine0.05
Placebo0.04

[back to top]

Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the Western Perioperative Neurologic Scale (WPNS)

The Western perioperative neurologic scale was designed to detect neurologic deficits after cardiac surgery. It includes 14 items classified into eight domains (mentation, speech, cranial nerve function, motor weakness, sensation and cerebellum, reflexes, and gait). Each item is scored from 0 (severe deficit) to3 (normal), and a maximum score of 42 indicates normal neurological function. (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 1-year

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine0.02
Placebo-0.02

[back to top]

Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the Western Perioperative Neurologic Scale (WPNS)

The Western perioperative neurologic scale was designed to detect neurologic deficits after cardiac surgery. It includes 14 items classified into eight domains (mentation, speech, cranial nerve function, motor weakness, sensation and cerebellum, reflexes, and gait). Each item is scored from 0 (severe deficit) to3 (normal), and a maximum score of 42 indicates normal neurological function. (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 6-weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine0.04
Placebo-0.01

[back to top]

Change in Perceived Social Support

"Perceived Social Support Scale: Twelve items indicate how strongly subjects agree that there is a special person who is around when I am in need and my family really tries to help me. Choices range from very strongly disagree to very strongly agree. Items are summed for a range of 12 to 84, with a high score meaning more social support." (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 1-year

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine0.71
Placebo-1.16

[back to top]

Change in Perceived Social Support

"Perceived Social Support Scale: Twelve items indicate how strongly subjects agree that there is a special person who is around when I am in need and my family really tries to help me. Choices range from very strongly disagree to very strongly agree. Items are summed for a range of 12 to 84, with a high score meaning more social support." (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 6-weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine1.23
Placebo-0.49

[back to top]

Transcerebral Activation Gradients of Platelets

Paired jugular venous and radial arterial blood samples were drawn at baseline, cross-clamp removal, end of cardiopulmonary bypass, and 6 hours post cross-clamp removalime points and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify activated platelets. Transcerebral activation gradients were calculated by subtracting arterial values from venous values and were compared between groups (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 hours post cross-clamp removal

,
InterventionMean linear fluorescence intensity-MLFI (Mean)
BaselineCross-clamp removalEnd of Bypass6 hours post cross-clamp removal
Lidocaine-0.030.030.330.37
Placebo0.350.430.050.27

[back to top]

Change in the Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS-IADL)

"Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS-IADL): This measure contains six items that assess the ability to perform important tasks for daily living (e.g., Could you prepare your own meals? Could you drive a car?). Scores range from 6 to 24. Higher scores indicate increasing difficulty in engaging in daily activities." (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 1-year

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine-0.15
Placebo-0.31

[back to top]

Change in Social Activity

"Social Activity: This measure consisted of eight items that indicate the degree of social interaction. Sample items are How often do you talk on the telephone with friends and relatives? and How often do you attend meetings of social groups, clubs, or civic organizations? Scores range from 8 to 32. A lower score indicates more social activity." (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 1-year

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine-0.20
Placebo0.03

[back to top]

Change in Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI)

"Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI): The STAI consists of two 20-item scales that measure anxiety. Representative items include statements such as I feel nervous and I feel worried. These items are rated on a 4-point scale, based on how well they describe the patient's current or typical mood, from not at all to very much so. Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety." (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 1-year

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine-6.70
Placebo-6.39

[back to top]

Change in Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI)

"Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI): The STAI consists of two 20-item scales that measure anxiety. Representative items include statements such as I feel nervous and I feel worried. These items are rated on a 4-point scale, based on how well they describe the patient's current or typical mood, from not at all to very much so. Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety." (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 6-weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine-7.12
Placebo-6.31

[back to top]

Change in Symptom Limitations

Symptom limitations: Patients were given a list of eight symptoms and asked to rate the degree to which the symptom limited daily activities. The symptoms were angina, shortness of breath, arthritis, back trouble, leg pains, headaches, fatigue, and other. Scores range from 8 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater limitations. (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 1-year

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine-1.39
Placebo-1.48

[back to top]

Change in Symptom Limitations

Symptom limitations: Patients were given a list of eight symptoms and asked to rate the degree to which the symptom limited daily activities. The symptoms were angina, shortness of breath, arthritis, back trouble, leg pains, headaches, fatigue, and other. Scores range from 8 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater limitations. (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 6-weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine-0.67
Placebo-0.8

[back to top]

Change in the Cognitive Difficulties Scale

"Cognitive Difficulties Scale: a 39-item scale, is a self-report assessment of perceived problems in long- and short-term memory, concentration, attention, and psycho-motor coordination. Sample items are I forget errands I planned to do and I fail to recognize people I know. Scores range from 39 to 164, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive difficulty." (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 1-year

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine-0.46
Placebo-1.02

[back to top]

Change in the Cognitive Difficulties Scale

"Cognitive Difficulties Scale: a 39-item scale, is a self-report assessment of perceived problems in long- and short-term memory, concentration, attention, and psycho-motor coordination. Sample items are I forget errands I planned to do and I fail to recognize people I know. Scores range from 39 to 164, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive difficulty." (NCT00938964)
Timeframe: baseline, 6-weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine-3
Placebo-3.21

[back to top]

Post ERCP Pancreatitis is the Primary Outcome.

The primary outcome of interest will be development of acute pancreatitis defined as new or worsening abdominal pain post-ERCP associated with an increase in serum amylase at least 3 times the upper limit of normal. (NCT00953199)
Timeframe: 24-48 hours post-procedure

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lidocaine26
Normal Saline20

[back to top]

Serum Amylase Levels

serum amylase levels are measure by a blood draw (NCT00953199)
Timeframe: measurement is taken 2 hrs after ERCP

Interventionunits/liter (Mean)
Lidocaine130
Normal Saline128

[back to top]

Clinical Response as Assessed by >20% Change From Baseline in the Pressure Pain Threshold

measurements were obtained by placing examiner's index finger of the examiner on the area of the trigger point (hyperirritable areas on skeletal muscle with palpable taut bands of muscle fibers) and exerting pressure until there was whitening of the nail bed. Pressure pain levels were rated subjectively by the participant and coded numerically as mild (1), moderate (2) to severe (3). (NCT00992108)
Timeframe: baseline, 4 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lidocaine3
Botulinum4

[back to top]

Clinical Response as Assessed by >20% Change From Baseline in the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS) Global Score

"The JFLS contains 20 items that measure limitations across mastication, vertical jaw mobility, and verbal/emotional expression rated on a 0-10 scale where 0 = no limitation and 10 = severe limitation." (NCT00992108)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lidocaine5
Botulinum7

[back to top]

Clinical Response as Assessed by >20% Change From Baseline in Jaw Opening

maximum mandibular range of motion scores (measured as the maximum interincisal distance and compensating for occlusion) (NCT00992108)
Timeframe: baseline, 4 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lidocaine2
Botulinum0

[back to top]

Clinical Response as Assessed by >20% Change From Baseline in the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS) Global Score

"The JFLS contains 20 items that measure limitations across mastication, vertical jaw mobility, and verbal/emotional expression rated on a 0-10 scale where 0 = no limitation and 10 = severe limitation." (NCT00992108)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lidocaine5
Botulinum6

[back to top]

Patients With Clinically Significant Reduction in Pain

Assessment of clinical significance of pain reduction in the Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler Mixed with Lidocaine nasolabial fold v. Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler without Lidocaine nasolabial fold defined as number of participants with >/= 2cm difference on a visual analog pain scale (1 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain). (NCT01012661)
Timeframe: Immediately after injection (Time 0)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Radiesse® Mixed With Lidocaine45
Radiesse® Without Lidocaine0

[back to top]

Pain Score Using a 10-cm Visual Analog Pain Scale (1 = no Pain, 10 = Very Severe Pain)

Assessment of difference in pain score in the Radiesse Dermal Filler Mixed with Lidocaine nasolabial fold v. the Radiesse Dermal Filler without Lidocaine nasolabial fold using a 10-cm visual analog pain scale (1 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain). (NCT01012661)
Timeframe: Immediately after injection (Time 0)

Interventioncm (Mean)
Radiesse® Mixed With Lidocaine2.8
Radiesse® Without Lidocaine6.6

[back to top]

Pain Score Using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain (0 = no Pain, 10 = Very Severe Pain)

"Assessment of whether a statistically significant reduction in pain score in the Radiesse® Mixed with Lidocaine nasolabial fold was observed when compared to the Radiesse® without Lidocaine nasolabial fold using a 10-cm visual analog pain scale (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain).~In the study protocol, the assessment of achieving a statistically significant reduction in pain at time zero was selected a priori to be analyzed using a paired t-test to test the null hypothesis that the mean of the differences in VAS scores between the Treatment and Control folds is equal to zero." (NCT01069354)
Timeframe: Immediately after injection (Time 0)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Radiesse® Mixed With Lidocaine2.32
Radiesse® Without Lidocaine6.73

[back to top]

Assess Subject Preference to Pain

"2 questions were asked of 101 subjects: 1) Was one treatment less painful than the other? and 2) Was the difference in pain levels significant enough to affect your preference for one treatment over the other?~Only those participants responding yes to these 2 questions about pain and preference for treatment are reported in the table below." (NCT01069354)
Timeframe: Immediately after injection (Time 0)

Intervention"participants responding yes" (Number)
Was One Treatment Less Painful Than the Other?Pain Significant Enough to Affect Preference?
Radiesse® Mixed With Lidocaine and Radiesse® Without Lidocaine9887

[back to top]

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 15 Minutes Post Injection

A 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain. (NCT01069354)
Timeframe: 15 minutes post injection

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Radiesse® Mixed With Lidocaine1.06
Radiesse® Without Lidocaine3.45

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Reduction in Pain As Defined by a ≥ 2.0-cm Reduction in VAS

"In this split-face study, a clinically meaningful difference in pain was defined as a 2-cm reduction (i.e., subject reports at least 2-cm less pain on a 10-cm VAS) in the Radiesse® Mixed with Lidocaine NLF when compared to the Radiesse® without Lidocaine NLF." (NCT01069354)
Timeframe: Immediately after injection (Time 0)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Radiesse® Mixed With Lidocaine and Radiesse® Without Lidocaine91

[back to top]

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 60 Minutes Post Injection

A 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain. (NCT01069354)
Timeframe: 60 minutes post injection

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Radiesse® Mixed With Lidocaine0.31
Radiesse® Without Lidocaine1.09

[back to top]

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 45 Minutes Post Injection

A 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain. (NCT01069354)
Timeframe: 45 minutes post injection

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Radiesse® Mixed With Lidocaine0.48
Radiesse® Without Lidocaine1.78

[back to top]

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 4 Weeks Post Injection

A 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain. (NCT01069354)
Timeframe: 4 weeks post injection

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Radiesse® Mixed With Lidocaine0
Radiesse® Without Lidocaine0

[back to top]

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 30 Minutes Post Injection

A 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain. (NCT01069354)
Timeframe: 30 minutes post injection

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Radiesse® Mixed With Lidocaine0.73
Radiesse® Without Lidocaine2.52

[back to top]

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 2 Weeks Post Injection

A 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain. (NCT01069354)
Timeframe: 2 weeks post injection

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Radiesse® Mixed With Lidocaine0.01
Radiesse® Without Lidocaine0

[back to top]

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 1 Week Post Injection

A 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain. (NCT01069354)
Timeframe: 1 week post injection

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Radiesse® Mixed With Lidocaine0.05
Radiesse® Without Lidocaine0.04

[back to top]

Pain Scores From Composite Visual Analog Scale

Scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain. (NCT01086150)
Timeframe: baseline, 4 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks
Patients With Non-painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy1.20.5
Type I or Type II Diabetes With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy6.54.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Discomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal Injection

"Discomfort according to the Eye Sensation Scale: 1-none, 2- mild, 3- moderate, 4- severe, 5- extremely severe~Patient satisfaction scale: 1=very unsatisfied, 2=unsatisfied, 3=neutral, 4=satisfied, 5= extremely satisfied" (NCT01087489)
Timeframe: immediately after injection, 1- hour later, and next day

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Discomfort during anesthetic preparationDiscomfort during needle penetrationSatisfaction with entire prep and injectionDiscomfort 1 h after injectionDiscomfort day after injectionNext day satisfaction with injection
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine Gel2.092.04.52.11.64.3
4% Liquid Lidocaine Method2.11.74.32.41.84.3

[back to top]

Presence and Severity of Keratopathy and the Size of Subconjunctival Hemorrhage

"Presence of corneal staining after the injection:~Quadrants of fluorescein staining: 0 1 2 3 4~Density of staining: 0- None 1- Mild 2- Moderate 3- Severe 4- corneal abrasion~Size of subconjunctival hemorrhage:~in clock hours" (NCT01087489)
Timeframe: within 10 minutes of the injection

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Corneal fluorescein stainingDensity of corneal staining
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine Gel2.31.3
4% Liquid Lidocaine Method3.01.9

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure Change After Intravitreal Injection With Each Anesthetic Method, Results Reported in mmHg

intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured immediately after the injection, and at 5, 10, and 15 minutes after the injection (until it was 30 mmHg or below). Prior to injection IOP and post-injection IOP were compared to find the IOP change after injection. (NCT01087489)
Timeframe: immediately after injection, at 5, 10, 15 minutes

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
baseline IOP before injectionIOP change after 0.05 cc injection
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine Gel15.930.9
4% Liquid Lidocaine Method15.525.7

[back to top]

Post Operative Pain

Outcome had a duration of one day at post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) Postoperative pain measured using a Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) Postoperative pain VRS scores: 0 = none pain to 10 = intolerable pain. (NCT01114997)
Timeframe: 1 day

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine4
Esmolol2
Lidocaine + Esmolol (Combo)4

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction

Patient satisfaction using a verbal rating scale from 0 to 10 0= Not satisfied 10= Excellent (NCT01114997)
Timeframe: 1 month

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine9.4
Esmolol9.2
Lidocaine + Esmolol (Combo)8.3

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption Obtained From the Recorded Data

Postoperative use of opioid consumption inside hospital (recorded by study staff and data obtained from patient charts) (NCT01114997)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionmg (Mean)
Lidocaine1.5
Esmolol1
Lidocaine + Esmolol (Combo)1.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Postoperative Nausea One Day After Surgery

Postoperative nausea using a Verbal Rating Scale Outcomes measured at the first day after surgery (NCT01114997)
Timeframe: 1day

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lidocaine3
Esmolol2
Lidocaine + Esmolol (Combo)3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Post Operative Pain One Month After Surgery

"Highest Post Operative pain one month after surgery, using a verbal rating score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (highest level of pain).~Patient received a post-operative follow-up call one month after surgery." (NCT01114997)
Timeframe: 1 month

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lidocaine10
Esmolol8
Lidocaine + Esmolol (Combo)10

[back to top]

Return to Normal Activities of Daily Living Using Follow up Questionnaires

Description: return to normal activities of daily living(including dietary intake, bowel and bladder function, physical activities) (NCT01114997)
Timeframe: 1 month

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lidocaine10
Esmolol8
Lidocaine + Esmolol (Combo)8

[back to top]

Post-anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Stay

(NCT01114997)
Timeframe: 1 day

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Lidocaine236
Esmolol116
Lidocaine + Esmolol (Combo)214

[back to top]

Pain and Disability of the Shoulder Through Validated Questionnaires

Patients will be asked to fill out questionnaires to provide insight into how their condition is progressing, consisting of components of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) total score. The maximum score is 100, made up by pain and function components' sums. Only the total score is recorded, 100 being full normal function without pain, 0 being severe pain and no function. (NCT01123889)
Timeframe: 12 weeks from initial injection of corticosteroid versus platelet rich plasma

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Control41.6
Experimental86.1

[back to top]

Pain and Disability of the Shoulder Through Validated Questionnaires

Patients will be asked to fill out questionnaires to provide insight into how their condition is progressing, consisting of components of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) total score. The maximum score is 100, made up by pain and function components' sums. Only the total score is recorded, 100 being full normal function without pain, 0 being severe pain and no function. (NCT01123889)
Timeframe: 15 minutes prior to initial injection of corticosteroid versus platelet rich plasma

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Control35.0
Experimental43.9

[back to top]

Pain and Disability of the Shoulder Through Validated Questionnaires

Patients will be asked to fill out questionnaires to provide insight into how their condition is progressing, consisting of components of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) total score. The maximum score is 100, made up by pain and function components' sums. Only the total score is recorded, 100 being full normal function without pain, 0 being severe pain and no function. (NCT01123889)
Timeframe: 6 weeks from initial injection of corticosteroid versus platelet rich plasma

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Control81.6
Experimental70.0

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale Pain Score

Visial Analog Pain Scores (VAS) range from 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain ever). Visial Analog Pain Scores are determined at each pain measurement time point (during/after VAC dressing removal). (NCT01126359)
Timeframe: 20 minutes

,,
InterventionVisial Analog Pain Score (VAS) (Mean)
During VAC change5 min post-VAC change10 min post VAC change20 min post VAC change
Lidocaine6.54.43.22.4
Lidocaine Minus Placebo-Saline Difference-2.4-2.0-1.5-1.8
Placebo-Saline8.96.44.74.2

[back to top]

Break-through Narcotic Requirement

Patient break-through narcotic requirements in morphine equivalents are 0.2 mg of dilaudid = 1 mg of morphine, iv., used during and after VAC dressing change. (NCT01126359)
Timeframe: 20 minutes

,,
InterventionNarcotic Requirements (mg) (Mean)
During VAC change5 min post-VAC change10 min post VAC change20 min post VAC change
Lidocaine1.30.80.20.0
Lidocaine Minus Placebo-Saline Difference-1.7-0.4-0.2-0.3
Placebo-Saline3.01.10.40.3

[back to top]

Radial Artery Spasm During Catheterization

The blinded clinical operator recorded whether radial artery spasm occurred, as detected by resistance to advancing the catheter through the radial artery, by difficulty in torquing the catheter, or by difficulty in removing the catheter. (NCT01155167)
Timeframe: 2 hours

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SpasmNo spasm
Placebo1030
Topical Dilator1030

[back to top]

Change in Radial Artery Diameter

The cross-sectional radial artery area was measured using a high frequency linear array transducer. All ultrasound measurements were made 2 cm proximal to the radial styloid process. Each measurement was performed 3 times and averaged. At least 30 minutes after the application of topical creams, the radial artery diameter was again measured in the same fashion. (NCT01155167)
Timeframe: Baseline and after 30 minutes of drug application

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Placebo-5.6
Topical Dilator16.5

[back to top]

Radial Artery Patency

Prior to discharge, color doppler ultrasound was used at the site where the sheath had been inserted to determine whether the radial artery was patent (open, unobstructed). (NCT01155167)
Timeframe: 24 hours

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patent radial arteryEarly radial artery occlusion
Placebo391
Topical Dilator430

[back to top]

Quality of Recovery 40 on the Day After Surgery

"Quality of Recovery 40 on the Day After Surgery. The survey is a quality of recovery tool and a score of 40 is low and 200 is high.~The minimum score is 40 which is minimum recovery score and them maximum score is 200 which is considered better recovery." (NCT01180660)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionunits on scale 40 (low) - 200 (high) (Median)
Lidocaine165
Placebo146

[back to top]

24 Hour Total Opioid Consumption

24 hour total opioid consumption using IV morphine equivalents (NCT01180660)
Timeframe: 24 hours post surgery

Interventionmiligrams (Median)
Lidocaine26
Placebo36

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at Week 48 After Final Initial Injection

WSRS is a validated 5-point reference scale with photographs that classifies facial wrinkles (nasolabial folds). WSRS represents a clinically meaningful change in NLF severity from the adjacent grades where 1 = absent (no visible fold; continuous skin line), 2 = mild (shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; implant is expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance), 3 = excellent (correction is expected from injectable implant), 4 = severe (very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible fold when stretched; significant improvement is expected from injectable implant), 5 = extreme (extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance; 2 to 4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched; unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01205048)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48 after final initial injection

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Emervel Classic Lidocaine-0.7
Juvederm Ultra-0.9

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at Week 3 After the Final Initial Injection

WSRS is a validated 5-point reference scale with photographs that classifies facial wrinkles (nasolabial folds). WSRS represents a clinically meaningful change in NLF severity from the adjacent grades where 1 = absent (no visible fold; continuous skin line), 2 = mild (shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; implant is expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance), 3 = excellent (correction is expected from injectable implant), 4 = severe (very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible fold when stretched; significant improvement is expected from injectable implant), 5 = extreme (extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance; 2 to 4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched; unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01205048)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 3 after final initial injection

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Emervel Classic Lidocaine-1.7
Juvederm Ultra-1.8

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at Week 24 After Final Initial Injection

WSRS is a validated 5-point reference scale with photographs that classifies facial wrinkles (nasolabial folds). WSRS represents clinically meaningful change in NLF severity from the adjacent grades where 1= absent (no visible fold; continuous skin line), 2 = mild (shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; implant expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance), 3 = excellent (correction is expected from injectable implant), 4 = severe (very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible fold when stretched; significant improvement expected from injectable implant), 5 = extreme (extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance; 2 to 4 millimeter (mm) visible V-shaped fold when stretched; unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01205048)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24 after final initial injection

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Emervel Classic Lidocaine-1.1
Juvederm Ultra-1.2

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at Week 12 After Final Initial Injection

WSRS is a validated 5-point reference scale with photographs that classifies facial wrinkles (nasolabial folds). WSRS represents a clinically meaningful change in nasolabial fold severity from the adjacent grades where 1 = absent (no visible fold; continuous skin line), 2 = mild (shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; implant is expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance), 3 = excellent (correction is expected from injectable implant), 4 = severe (very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible fold when stretched; significant improvement is expected from injectable implant), 5 = extreme (extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance; 2 to 4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched; unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01205048)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 after final initial injection

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Emervel Classic Lidocaine-1.5
Juvederm Ultra-1.5

[back to top]

Participant Pain Assessment After the Initial Injection

Participant pain severity for each NLF was assessed at time 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes and 24 hours after the initial injection using an 11-point Numeric Pain Intensity Scale (NPIS).The NPIS was a pain screening tool, commonly used to assess pain severity at that moment in time using a 0-10 scale, with 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst possible pain. (NCT01205048)
Timeframe: At 0 ,15, 30, 45, 60 minutes and 24 hours after the initial injection

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
At 0 MinutesAt 15 MinutesAt 30 MinutesAt 45 MinutesAt 60 MinutesAt 24 Hours
Emervel Classic Lidocaine2.90.50.20.20.10.4
Juvederm Ultra5.62.11.10.70.50.4

[back to top]

Participant Pain Assessment After the Initial Touch-up Injection

Participant pain severity for each NLF was assessed at time 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes and 24 hours after the initial injection using an 11-point Numeric Pain Intensity Scale (NPIS).The NPIS was a pain screening tool, commonly used to assess pain severity at that moment in time using a 0-10 scale, with 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst possible pain. (NCT01205048)
Timeframe: At 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes and 24 hours after the Initial Touch-up Injection

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
At 0 MinutesAt 15 MinutesAt 30 MinutesAt 45 MinutesAt 60 MinutesAt 24 Hours
Emervel Classic Lidocaine2.30.30.20.10.10.2
Juvederm Ultra4.41.40.60.30.20.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Participant Self-Assessment of Wrinkle Severity at Week 24 After Final Initial Injection

Participants self-assessment was measured by using a wrinkle severity scale with 1 being absent and 5 being extreme. Each participant was to perform an assessment of the wrinkle severity based on self-assessment score: 1= Absent (No visible fold; continuous skin line), 2= Mild (Shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation), 3= Moderate (Moderately deep folds), 4= Severe (Very long and deep fold), 5= Extreme (Extremely deep and long folds). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01205048)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24 after final initial injection

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Emervel Classic Lidocaine-1.3
Juvederm Ultra-1.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

"AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug. Number of participants with AEs were reported. Event was unrelated to study product or injection procedure. If the treated side where an AE occurred was not applicable, this AE was summarized under each treatment group." (NCT01205048)
Timeframe: From start of study drug administration up to 56 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Emervel Classic Lidocaine66
Juvederm Ultra64

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Scale (WSRS) at Week 36 After Final Initial Injection

WSRS is a validated 5-point reference scale with photographs that classifies facial wrinkles (nasolabial folds). WSRS represents a clinically meaningful change in NLF severity from the adjacent grades where 1 = absent (no visible fold; continuous skin line), 2 = mild (shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; implant is expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance), 3 = excellent (correction is expected from injectable implant), 4 = severe (very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible fold when stretched; significant improvement is expected from injectable implant), 5 = extreme (extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance; 2 to 4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched; unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01205048)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 36 after final initial injection

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Emervel Classic Lidocaine-1.0
Juvederm Ultra-1.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Participant Self-Assessment of Wrinkle Severity at Week 24 After Final Initial Injection

Participants self-assessment was measured by using a wrinkle severity scale with 1 being absent and 5 being extreme. Each participant was to perform an assessment of the wrinkle severity based on self-assessment score: 1= Absent (No visible fold; continuous skin line), 2= Mild (Shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation), 3= Moderate (Moderately deep folds), 4= Severe (Very long and deep fold), 5= Extreme (Extremely deep and long folds). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01205061)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24 after final initial injection (Week 24 for participants without touch-up injection, Week 27 for participants with touch-up injection at Week 3)

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Emervel Deep Lidocaine-1.2
Juvederm Ultra Plus-1.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at Week 24 After Final Initial Injection

WSRS is a validated 5-point reference scale with photographs that classifies deep facial wrinkles (nasolabial folds). WSRS represents clinically meaningful change in NLF severity from the adjacent grades where 1= absent (no visible fold; continuous skin line), 2 = mild (shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; implant expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance), 3 = excellent (correction is expected from injectable implant), 4 = severe (very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible fold when stretched; significant improvement expected from injectable implant), 5 = extreme (extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance; 2 to 4 millimeter (mm) visible V-shaped fold when stretched; unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01205061)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24 after final initial injection (Week 24 for participants without touch-up injection, Week 27 for participants with touch-up injection at Week 3)

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Emervel Deep Lidocaine-1.1
Juvederm Ultra Plus-1.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Score (WSRS) at Week 12 After Final Initial Injection

WSRS is a validated 5-point reference scale with photographs that classifies deep facial wrinkles (nasolabial folds). WSRS represents a clinically meaningful change in nasolabial fold severity from the adjacent grades where 1 = absent (no visible fold; continuous skin line), 2 = mild (shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; implant is expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance), 3 = excellent (correction is expected from injectable implant), 4 = severe (very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible fold when stretched; significant improvement is expected from injectable implant), 5 = extreme (extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance; 2 to 4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched; unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01205061)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 after final initial injection (Week 12 for participants without touch-up injection, Week 15 for participants with touch-up injection at Week 3)

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Emervel Deep Lidocaine-1.3
Juvederm Ultra Plus-1.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Score (WSRS) at Week 36 After Final Initial Injection

WSRS is a validated 5-point reference scale with photographs that classifies deep facial wrinkles (nasolabial folds). WSRS represents a clinically meaningful change in nasolabial fold severity from the adjacent grades where 1 = absent (no visible fold; continuous skin line), 2 = mild (shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; implant is expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance), 3 = excellent (correction is expected from injectable implant), 4 = severe (very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible fold when stretched; significant improvement is expected from injectable implant), 5 = extreme (extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance; 2 to 4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched; unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01205061)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 36 after final initial injection (Week 36 for participants without touch-up injection, Week 39 for participants with touch-up injection at Week 3)

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Emervel Deep Lidocaine-1.1
Juvederm Ultra Plus-1.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Score (WSRS) at Week 48 After Final Initial Injection

WSRS is a nasolabial fold severity from the adjacent grades where 1 = absent (no visible fold; continuous skin line), 2 = mild (shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; implant is expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance), 3 = excellent (correction is expected from injectable implant), 4 = severe (very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible fold when stretched; significant improvement is expected from injectable implant), 5 = extreme (extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance; 2 to 4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched; unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01205061)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48 after final initial injection (Week 48 for participants without touch-up injection, Week 51 for participants with touch-up injection at Week 3)

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Emervel Deep Lidocaine-0.8
Juvederm Ultra Plus-0.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Event (AEs)

"AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug. Number of participants with AEs were reported. Event was unrelated to study product or injection procedure. If the treated side where an AE occurred was not applicable, this AE was summarized under each treatment group." (NCT01205061)
Timeframe: From start of study drug administration up to 62 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Emervel Deep Lidocaine66
Juvederm Ultra Plus67

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Score (WSRS) at Week 3 After Final Initial Injection

WSRS is a validated 5-point reference scale with photographs that classifies deep facial wrinkles (nasolabial folds). WSRS represents a clinically meaningful change in nasolabial fold severity from the adjacent grades where 1 = absent (no visible fold; continuous skin line), 2 = mild (shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature; implant is expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance), 3 = excellent (correction is expected from injectable implant), 4 = severe (very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature; less than 2 mm visible fold when stretched; significant improvement is expected from injectable implant), 5 = extreme (extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance; 2 to 4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched; unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01205061)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 3 after final initial injection (Week 3 for participants without touch-up injection, Week 6 for participants with touch-up injection at Week 3)

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Emervel Deep Lidocaine-1.6
Juvederm Ultra Plus-1.6

[back to top]

Participant Pain Assessment After the Initial Touch-up Injection

Participant pain severity for each NLF was assessed at time 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes and 24 hours after the initial injection using NPIS. The NPIS was a pain screening tool, commonly used to assess pain severity at that moment in time using a 0-10 scale, with 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst possible pain where a lower score correlates to better outcome for pain. (NCT01205061)
Timeframe: At 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes and 24 hours after the Initial Touch-up Injection (At 3 weeks after initial injection)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
At 0 MinutesAt 15 MinutesAt 30 MinutesAt 45 MinutesAt 60 MinutesAt 24 Hours
Emervel Deep Lidocaine3.30.70.30.10.10.5
Juvederm Ultra Plus4.81.20.50.20.10.6

[back to top]

Participant Pain Assessment After the Initial Injection

Participant pain severity for each NLF was assessed at time 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes and 24 hours after the initial injection using an 11-point Numeric Pain Intensity Scale (NPIS).The NPIS was a pain screening tool, commonly used to assess pain severity at that moment in time using a 0-10 scale, with 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst possible pain where a lower score correlates to better outcome for pain. (NCT01205061)
Timeframe: At 0 ,15, 30, 45, 60 minutes and 24 hours after the initial injection (Baseline)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
At 0 MinutesAt 15 MinutesAt 30 MinutesAt 45 MinutesAt 60 MinutesAt 24 Hours
Emervel Deep Lidocaine3.10.50.20.10.10.9
Juvederm Ultra Plus5.31.81.00.50.30.9

[back to top]

Median Visual Analogue Score Measuring Pain

"We asked participants to report their pain score on visual analogue scale (0mm=no pain and 100mm=worse pain possible) at the following time points:~Speculum placement~Tenaculum placement~Paracervical block administration(if subject is in this arm)~IUD insertion~Five minutes post procedure" (NCT01207401)
Timeframe: 1) Speculum placement 2) Tenaculum placement 3) Paracervical block administration(if subject is in this arm) 4) IUD insertion 5) Five minutes post procedure

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
1) Speculum Placement2) Tenaculum Placement3) Paracervical Block administration4) IUD insertion5) 5 minutes post procedure
No Paracervical Block8.528NA6217
Paracervical Block1212402412

[back to top]

Pain During IUD Insertion at Various Time Points (See Description for Time Points)

Patient marked pain on a 100 mm visual analogue scale during the part of the IUD insertion procedure where the tenaculum was placed, the uterus was measured/sounded, the IUD was inserted into the uterus, and the speculum was removed. (NCT01214161)
Timeframe: During IUD insertion (see above description for which time points)

,
Interventionunits on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (Mean)
Tenaculum placementUterine soundingIUD insertionSpeculum removal
Lidocaine Gel35.455.551.020
Placebo Gel (Surgilube)34.351.650.920

[back to top]

Adverse Events

(NCT01214161)
Timeframe: During IUD insertion

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
NauseaVomitingDizziness
Lidocaine Gel809
Placebo Gel (Surgilube)4012

[back to top]

Provider's Assessment of Patient's Maximum Pain on a Visual Analogue Scale

This secondary analysis looked at provider perception of patient maximum pain during IUD insertion This was not done per intervention because we were looking at the accuracy of the provider's assesment of the patient's pain, which is not dependent on intervention. The provider was blinded to the intervention so that would not have influenced results. (NCT01214161)
Timeframe: during IUD insertion

Interventionunits on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (Mean)
Participants63.8
Providers35.3

[back to top]

Pain, Measured as Units on a Scale

Pain scores at time of needle insertion using neonatal facial coding score. The scale has five components; cry, brow bulge, eye squeeze; nasolabial fold and open month. Each component is either present or absent, with a value of 0 or 1 given. Minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 5 possible (NCT01224431)
Timeframe: on average the first hour in emergency department at 4 time points during entire lumbar puncture procedure.

Interventionunits on scale, 0-5 (Mean)
Needleless Injection of Buffered Lidocaine4.0
Normal Saline Via Needleless Injection4.8

[back to top]

Length of Cry

cry video recorded and measured after needle stick until pt stopped crying (NCT01224431)
Timeframe: On average the first hour in the emergency department; from needle stick to end of lumbar puncture

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Buffered Lidocaine J-tip38.53
Normal Saline J-tip48.76

[back to top]

Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ)

The RDQ is a back pain specific functional status questionnaire adapted from the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). The RDQ consists of 24 yes/no items, which represent common dysfunctions in daily activities experienced by subjects with low back pain. A single unweighted score is derived by summing the 24 items, with higher scores indicating worse function with 0 (no disability) to 24 (maximum disability). Our primary analysis will be a simple 2-group comparison of the mean Roland score as an evaluation of the short-term efficacy of epidural steroid injection. (NCT01238536)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Epidural Steroid Injection12.0
Epidural Local Anesthetic Injection11.5

[back to top]

Roland Morris

The primary outcome measure will be back specific functional status, measured by the Roland Scale at 6 weeks. The RDQ is a back pain specific functional status questionnaire adapted from the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). The RDQ consists of 24 yes/no items, which represent common dysfunctions in daily activities experienced by subjects with low back pain. A single unweighted score is derived by summing the 24 items, with higher scores indicating worse function with 0 (no disability) to 24 (maximum disability). Our primary analysis will be a simple 2-group comparison of the mean Roland score as an evaluation of the short-term efficacy of epidural steroid injection. (NCT01238536)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Epidural Steroid Injection11.8
Epidural Local Anesthetic Injection12.5

[back to top]

Pain Numeric Rating Scale

Leg Pain NRS is a second primary outcome at 6 weeks We measured leg pain using a 0-10 pain NRS (0=no pain and 10=worst pain imaginable) assessing average pain over the past week. (NCT01238536)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Epidural Steroid Injection4.4
Epidural Local Anesthetic Injection4.6

[back to top]

Leg Pain NRS

Leg Pain NRS 0-10 scale (NCT01238536)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Epidural Steroid Injection4.7
Epidural Local Anesthetic Injection4.3

[back to top]

Onset of Action

Time from infusion of local anesthetic to loss of sensation to sharp. (NCT01243112)
Timeframe: Up to 5 minutes

Interventionsecond (Mean)
1% Lidocaine With Epinephrine0.25% Bupivacaine With Epinephrine0.5% Lidocaine and 0.125% Bupivacaine With Epineph1% Lidocaine and 0.25% Bupivacaine With Epinephrin
Study Group29192612

[back to top]

Length of Action

The time from onset of local anesthesia until cessation of effect by sensation of sharp measured in 15 minute increments. (NCT01243112)
Timeframe: Up to 12 hours

Interventionminutes (Mean)
1% Lidocaine With Epinephrine0.25% Bupivacaine With Epinephrine0.5% Lidocaine and 0.125% Bupivacaine With Epineph1% Lidocaine and 0.25% Bupivacaine With Epinephrin
Study Group6.637.027.487.16

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption (Morphine Equivalents)

opioid consumption (morphine equivalents)post operatively (NCT01250002)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionmg (Median)
Group A (Study Group) Lidocaine20
Placebo30

[back to top]

Quality of Recovery 40 Score

Quality of recovery 40 score on the day after surgery. Scale ranges from a low of 40 (poor recovery) to a high of 200 (good recovery). (NCT01250002)
Timeframe: 24 hours post surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Group A (Study Group) Lidocaine175
Placebo157.5

[back to top]

Quality of Life SF-36

The SF-36 consists of 36 items addressing the patient's perception of their quality of life (QoL) in the following eight domains: physical function (PF), role limitations due to physical problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), and mental health (MH), and one item change in health. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100, with 100 as the best, most positive QoL in that area and 0 is the worst. There is a total scale score, all subscales range from 0 to 100. This scale was validated in Colombia. (NCT01250184)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Changing HealthBody painEmotional performancePhysical performancePhysical FunctionSocial FunctionGeneral HealthMental HealthVitality
Lidocaine Injection70.2361.1990.6087.799083.2877.4478.9569.64
Lidocaine Injection + Physical Therapy70.566.5883.2581.8887.7582.671.6775.363.38
Physical Therapy69.7665.6684.1382.589.1383.0568.2571.3261.95

[back to top]

PHQ 9 Function Measured With the Hand Back and Hand Mouth Maneuvers. Complications and Adverse Reactions Need for Rescue Medication

The PHQ-9 was developed from the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. The self-report instrument asks individuals how much they had been bothered by any of the nine problems over the prior two weeks. Items are scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Items are summed and the total score (from 0 to 27) represents the severity of depressive symptoms. 0 - 4 None-minimal None, 5 - 9 Mild, 10 - 14 Moderate, 15 - 19 Moderately Severe, 20 - 27 Severe (NCT01250184)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine Injection + Physical Therapy3.98
Lidocaine Injection3.16
Physical Therapy4.12

[back to top]

Quality of Life SF-36

The SF-36 consists of 36 items addressing the patient's perception of their quality of life (QoL) in the following eight domains: physical function (PF), role limitations due to physical problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), and mental health (MH), and one item change in health. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100, with 100 as the best, most positive QoL in that area and 0 is the worst. There is a total scale score, all subscales range from 0 to 100. This scale was validated in Colombia. (NCT01250184)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Changing HealthBody painEmotional performancePhysical performancePhysical FunctionSocial FunctionGeneral HealthMental HealthVitality
Lidocaine Injection67.851.7878.7674.3986.8378.1573.5469.9562.56
Lidocaine Injection + Physical Therapy70.055.378.273.186.879.272.173.261.3
Physical Therapy60.9357.1285.8573.8482.7981.5165.7070.0559.88

[back to top]

Visual Analogue Scale

VAS with a score of 0-100, where 100 is the value representing the highest degree of pain and 0 the lowest. Successful treatment was defined as a reduction in pain of at least 20% of the previous score on the VAS after 4 weeks of the initial evaluation, or 14 mm on the VAS; this scale is a reliable pain assessment measure that has been validated previously (NCT01250184)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine Injection + Physical Therapy40.8
Lidocaine Injection44.2
Physical Therapy37.8

[back to top]

PHQ 9 Function Measured With the Hand Back and Hand Mouth Maneuvers. Complications and Adverse Reactions Need for Rescue Medication

The PHQ-9 was developed from the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. The self-report instrument asks individuals how much they had been bothered by any of the nine problems over the prior two weeks. Items are scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Items are summed and the total score (from 0 to 27) represents the severity of depressive symptoms. 0 - 4 None-minimal None, 5 - 9 Mild, 10 - 14 Moderate, 15 - 19 Moderately Severe, 20 - 27 Severe (NCT01250184)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine Injection + Physical Therapy4.33
Lidocaine Injection4.44
Physical Therapy4.43

[back to top]

Visual Analogue Scale

VAS with a score of 0-100, where 100 is the value representing the highest degree of pain and 0 the lowest. Successful treatment was defined as a reduction in pain of at least 20% of the previous score on the VAS after 4 weeks of the initial evaluation, or 14 mm on the VAS; this scale is a reliable pain assessment measure that has been validated previously (NCT01250184)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine Injection + Physical Therapy21.6
Lidocaine Injection28.8
Physical Therapy28.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Sore Throat Pain Intensity up to 240 mn Post-dose

100 milimeter (mm) visual acuity score (left=no pain=0mm, right=worst possible pain=100mm). It measures the highest pain level felt by the patient. (NCT01265446)
Timeframe: Baseline and 240 mn post-dose

Interventionmm (Mean)
Lidocaine 8mg +CPC 2mg-25.5
Lidocaine 1mg + CPC 2mg-29.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Sore Throat Pain Intensity

100 milimeter (mm) visual acuity score (left=no pain=0mm, right=worst possible pain=100mm) (NCT01265446)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 hours post-dose

Interventionmm (Mean)
Lidocaine 8mg +CPC 2mg-27.4
Lidocaine 1mg + CPC 2mg-26.9

[back to top]

Categorical Groups Based on Magnitude of Differences Between Noninvasive (SpHb) and Laboratory Co-Oximeter (tHb) Hemoglobin in Patients With a Finger Regional Anesthetic Block.

(NCT01284296)
Timeframe: A minimum of 2-4 differences recorded approximately hourly during surgery

,
Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin readings (Number)
< 0.5 g/dL0.5-1.0 g/dL1.1-1.5 g/dL1.6-2.0 g/dL>2.0 g/dL
Digital Block (All Perfusion Indices 0.29-8.3)371918179
Digital Block (Perfusion Indices >2.0)372620143

[back to top]

Mean Pain Score During IUD Insertion

0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, higher values represent more pain. (NCT01292447)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Control Group36.7
Study Group35.2

[back to top]

Soft Tissue Anesthesia Duration

"Assessment of pain using a Rotadent sensor probe, applying up to 20 grams/cm^2 at the tissue site. At each time point, participants were asked if they felt pain from the sensor probe at each site location in the mouth. The four sites were:~Site 1: Distal to the apex of the tooth in the position of the maxillary first premolar at the deepest point in the buccal vestibule~Site 2: Apical to the maxillary lateral incisor at the deepest point in the labial vestibule~Site 3: Incisive papilla~Site 4: At the confluence of the alveolar process and hard palate medial to the maxillary second premolar (near the greater palatine foramen)" (NCT01302483)
Timeframe: Baseline, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 80, 100, 120 minutes

,
InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Site 1 DurationSite 2 DurationSite 3 DurationSite 4 Duration
Kovacaine Nasal Spray21.116.131.831.4
Lidocaine Injection34.232.125.029.3

[back to top]

Maximum Change in Pulse From Baseline

Maximum change from Baseline at any time point. (NCT01302483)
Timeframe: Baseline, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 120 minutes

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Kovacaine Nasal Spray-11.13
Lidocaine Injection-6.60

[back to top]

Maximum Change in Pulse Oximetry From Baseline

Maximum change from Baseline at any time point (NCT01302483)
Timeframe: Baseline, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 120 minutes

InterventionSpO2 (Mean)
Kovacaine Nasal Spray0.17
Lidocaine Injection-0.80

[back to top]

Maximum Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline

Maximum change from Baseline at any time point. (NCT01302483)
Timeframe: Baseline, 15, 20, 30, 40 50, 60, 120 minutes

,
InterventionmmHG (Mean)
Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure
Kovacaine Nasal Spray4.50-2.67
Lidocaine Injection3.43-5.07

[back to top]

Pulpal Anesthesia

Number of participants who did not need rescue anesthesia to complete the study dental procedure, i.e. Kovacaine provided enough pulpal anesthesia to complete a dental procedure. (NCT01302483)
Timeframe: Continuous throughout dental treatment period (up to 60 minutes)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Kovacaine Nasal Spray25
Lidocaine Injection14

[back to top]

Rank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until Anesthesia

Rank-transformed time (seconds) until anesthesia will be assessed using a repeated sensory stimulus. (NCT01304082)
Timeframe: 0-180 seconds after each injection

,,
Interventionrank (Least Squares Mean)
Rank-transformed time (s)Difference compared to controlDifference compared to lidocaine
Alkalinized Lidocaine1.48-1.41-0.14
Lidocaine1.62-1.280
Normal Saline2.9001.28

[back to top]

Rank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until Hypoesthesia

Rank-transformed time (seconds) until hypoesthesia will be assessed using a sensory stimulus (NCT01304082)
Timeframe: 0-180 seconds after each injection.

,,
Interventionrank (Least Squares Mean)
Rank-transformed time (s)Difference compared to controlDifference compared to lidocaine
Alkalinized Lidocaine1.59-1.360.121
Lidocaine1.47-1.480
Normal Saline2.9501.48

[back to top]

Rank-transformed Pain Score

"Pain score upon injection of local anesthetic:~the pain score is a validated 11-point numeric rating scale in which patients rate pain between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst pain imaginable)." (NCT01304082)
Timeframe: immediate, upon injection of each solution

,,
Interventionrank (Least Squares Mean)
Rank-transformed pain scoreDifference compared to controlDifference compared to lidocaine
Alkalinized Lidocaine1.93-0.034-0.172
Lidocaine2.100.1380
Normal Saline1.970-0.138

[back to top]

Rank-transformed Pain Score Upon Needle Stick.

"Pain score upon needle stick:~The pain score is a validated 11-point numeric rating scale in which patients rate pain between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst pain imaginable)." (NCT01304082)
Timeframe: 1 minute after each injection

,,
Interventionrank (Least Squares Mean)
Rank-transformed pain scoreDifference compared to controlDifference compared to lidocaine
Alkalinized Lidocaine1.64-1.090
Lidocaine1.64-1.090
Normal Saline2.7201.09

[back to top]

Pain During Tenaculum Placement

"Pain score on 0-9 scale for tenaculum placement (without anesthesia); with 0 being no pain and 9 being worst pain in life. Taken to adjust for different pain thresholds among subjects" (NCT01311102)
Timeframe: Immediately following tenaculum placement

Interventionunits on a scale of 0-9 (Mean)
Lidocaine2.20
Normal Saline2.70

[back to top]

Pain Measurement During Liquid Infusion/Sounding

"After liquid infused into three parts of the endometrial cavity: in the lower one third, the middle, and at the top of the cavity. Pain was scored on a 0-9 scale; with 0 being no pain and 9 being worst pain in life." (NCT01311102)
Timeframe: Recorded at the end of the infusion

Interventionunits on a scale of 0-9 (Mean)
Lidocaine2.50
Normal Saline3.39

[back to top]

Pain Scores During Overall IUD Placement

"Pain score on 0-9 scale obtained just before the patient left the examination room; with 0 being no pain and 9 being worst pain in life." (NCT01311102)
Timeframe: Before patient left the examination room at conclusion of procedure

Interventionunits on a scale of 0-9 (Mean)
Lidocaine2.12
Normal Saline1.73

[back to top]

Pain During IUD Placement

"IUD was inserted following the manufacturer's instructions, and a pain score was immediately obtained. Pain was scored on 0-9 scale; with 0 being no pain and 9 being worst pain in life." (NCT01311102)
Timeframe: Immediately after IUD placement

Interventionunits on a scale of 0-9 (Mean)
Lidocaine2.95
Normal Saline3.68

[back to top]

Pain Assessment: During Procedure

visual analog scale (VAS) 0 = no pain to 100 = worse pain possible Rather, this is a pain assessment during the actual procedure rather than during the pre-procedure lidocaine injection. (NCT01330134)
Timeframe: post procedure (day 1)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine Onto Skin Prior to Lidocaine Subcutaneous Injection12.2
Lidocaine Subcutaneous Injection Alone16.6

[back to top]

Pain Assessment: Lidocaine Injection

visual analog scale (VAS) 0= no pain to 100 = worse pain possible (NCT01330134)
Timeframe: post procedure (day 1)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine Onto Skin Prior to Lidocaine Subcutaneous Injection18.4
Lidocaine Subcutaneous Injection Alone20.8

[back to top]

Pain Assessment: Overall

Visual analog scale (VAS). This is a standardized analog scale with scores from 0-100. It measures level of pain with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning the most extreme level of pain. Higher values refer to a worse outcome. (NCT01330134)
Timeframe: post procedure (day 1)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine Onto Skin Prior to Lidocaine Subcutaneous Injection15.3
Lidocaine Subcutaneous Injection Alone19.0

[back to top]

Postoperative Nausea

To assess whether HC/APAP is associated with nausea, measured on the 100 mm VAS, recorded 30 minutes postoperatively. VAS anchors: 0 indicates no pain, and 100 indicates worst pain imaginable. (NCT01330459)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after completion of the procedure (which started 45-90 minutes after study drug administration)

Interventionmm (Mean)
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen19.4
Placebo11.4

[back to top]

Satisfaction With Pain Control

Distance (mm) from the left of the 100 mm VAS (VAS anchors: 0 = unsatisfied, 100 mm = very satisfied) recorded 30 minutes after completion of the procedure. (NCT01330459)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after completion of the procedure (which started 45-90 minutes after study drug administration)

Interventionmm (Mean)
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen74.8
Placebo67.3

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Pain

To determine whether HC/APAP, given in addition to a standard regimen of ibuprofen, lorazepam, and PCB, affects patient pain perception at the time of uterine aspiration, as measured by distance (mm) from the left of the 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). The number 0 indicates no pain, and 100 indicates worst pain imaginable. (NCT01330459)
Timeframe: At time of uterine aspiration (baseline)

Interventionmm (Mean)
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen65.7
Placebo63.1

[back to top]

Need for Additional Intraoperative and/or Postoperative Pain Medication

To assess need for additional intraoperative and/or postoperative pain medication (NCT01330459)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after completion of the procedure (which started 45-90 minutes after study drug administration)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Pain During Cervical Dilation

Distance (mm) from the left of the 100 mm VAS scale (VAS anchors: 0 = none, 100 mm = worst imaginable) recorded after cervical dilation (NCT01330459)
Timeframe: During procedure (approximately 45-90 min after hydrocodone/acetaminophen or placebo, and within 5 minutes of procedure starting)

Interventionmm (Mean)
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen47.2
Placebo43.9

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Pain Associated With Injection of Propofol.

"Ten seconds following injection of propofol, subjects were asked Are you having pain at your IV site? Any behavioral signs were noted. Injection pain was assessed using the following four point scale: 0 = no pain; 1 = mild pain (pain reported only in response to questioning and without behavioral signs); 2 = moderate pain (pain reported in response to questioning and accompanied by a behavioral sign, or pain reported spontaneously without questioning); and 3 = severe pain (strong vocal response or response accompanied by facial grimacing, arm withdrawal, or tears)." (NCT01342510)
Timeframe: < 1 minute.

Interventionparticipants reporting pain (Number)
Lidocaine11
Magnesium25
Lidocaine/Magnesium15
Control18

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Pain With Injection of Propofol

Following injection of the study drug, 50 mg of propofol will be injected. Ten seconds after propofol, subjects will be asked a standard question about pain. Behavioral signs will be noted. Pain will be assessed using a four point scale: 0=no pain, 1=mild pain (pain reported only in response to questioning and without behavioral signs), 2=moderate pain (pain reported in response to questioning and a behavioral sign, or pain reported without questioning), 3=severe pain (strong vocal response or behavioral response). (NCT01342510)
Timeframe: Approximately 10 seconds following administration of propofol.

Interventionpercentage of patients reporting pain (Number)
Lidocaine29
Magnesium57
Lidocaine/Magnesium41
Control46

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Post-dose (AUC 0-t)

(NCT01355588)
Timeframe: Anytime at pre-dose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hours, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours (ketorolac tromethamine only), and 24 hours (ketorolac tromethamine only) post-dose

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine8440.6
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 4% Lidocaine Hydrochloride (HCl)7856.0
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 5% Lidocaine HCl7561.5
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 6% Lidocaine HCl8103.8

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC 0-∞)

(NCT01355588)
Timeframe: Anytime at pre-dose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hours, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours (ketorolac tromethamine only), and 24 hours (ketorolac tromethamine only) post-dose

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine9061.9
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 4% Lidocaine Hydrochloride (HCl)8694.5
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 5% Lidocaine HCl8086.8
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 6% Lidocaine HCl8677.6

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

(NCT01355588)
Timeframe: Anytime at pre-dose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hours, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours (ketorolac tromethamine only), and 24 hours (ketorolac tromethamine only) post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine2059.6
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 4% Lidocaine Hydrochloride (HCl)1963.1
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 5% Lidocaine HCl1799.9
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 6% Lidocaine HCl2048.5

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)

(NCT01355588)
Timeframe: Anytime at pre-dose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hours, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours (ketorolac tromethamine only), and 24 hours (ketorolac tromethamine only) post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
Ketorolac Tromethamine0.510
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 4% Lidocaine Hydrochloride (HCl)0.500
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 5% Lidocaine HCl0.390
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 6% Lidocaine HCl0.410

[back to top]

Participants Score on Pain Scale

Do you have sharp pain in your eye? Pain will be assessed by units on a scale of 1-5: 1 means no symptoms, 2 means slight discomfort, 3 means mild discomfort, 4 means moderate discomfort, and 5 means severe discomfort (NCT01383200)
Timeframe: 1 hour (60minutes) post LASIK operation

InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Tetracaine1.95
Lidocaine2.01

[back to top]

Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, Have Any Practical Matters Resulting From Your Illness, Either Financial or Personal, Been Addressed?

Effect of Lidocaine infusion on Quality Of Life parameters as measured by the Patient Outcome Scale (POS) Questionnaire Baseline scores were compared to an average post treatment score (taken immediately post treatment and on days 2, 3, and 7 following treatment) All POS questions were scored from 0 to 4 with lower scores requiring less clinical attention than higher scores (NCT01384877)
Timeframe: At most 6 weeks (duration of study)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselinePeriod 1Period 2
Lidocaine/Placebo1.081.171.20
Placebo (D5W)/Lidocaine1.01.120.93

[back to top]

Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, Have Other Symptoms e.g. Feeling Sick, Having a Cough or Constipation Been Affecting How You Feel?

Effect of Lidocaine infusion on Quality Of Life parameters as measured by the Patient Outcome Scale (POS) Questionnaire Baseline scores were compared to an average post treatment score (taken immediately post treatment and on days 2, 3, and 7 following treatment) All POS questions were scored from 0 to 4 with lower scores requiring less clinical attention than higher scores (NCT01384877)
Timeframe: At most 6 weeks (duration of study)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselinePeriod 1Period 2
Lidocaine/Placebo1.471.401.43
Placebo (D5W)/Lidocaine1.51.290.95

[back to top]

Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, Have You Been Able to Share How You Are Feeling With Your Family or Friends?

Effect of Lidocaine infusion on Quality Of Life parameters as measured by the Patient Outcome Scale (POS) Questionnaire Baseline scores were compared to an average post treatment score (taken immediately post treatment and on days 2, 3, and 7 following treatment) All POS questions were scored from 0 to 4 with lower scores requiring less clinical attention than higher scores (NCT01384877)
Timeframe: At most 6 weeks (duration of study)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselinePeriod 1Period 2
Lidocaine/Placebo0.871.271.12
Placebo (D5W)/Lidocaine1.331.321.50

[back to top]

Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, Have You Been Affected by Pain?

Effect of Lidocaine infusion on Quality Of Life parameters as measured by the Patient Outcome Scale (POS) Questionnaire Baseline scores were compared to an average post treatment score (taken immediately post treatment and on days 2, 3, and 7 following treatment) All POS questions were scored from 0 to 4 with lower scores requiring less clinical attention than higher scores (NCT01384877)
Timeframe: At most 6 weeks (duration of study)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselinePeriod 1Period 2
Lidocaine/Placebo2.932.622.52
Placebo (D5W)/Lidocaine2.672.522.40

[back to top]

Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, Have You Been Feeling Anxious or Worried About Your Illness or Treatment?

Effect of Lidocaine infusion on Quality Of Life parameters as measured by the Patient Outcome Scale (POS) Questionnaire Baseline scores were compared to an average post treatment score (taken immediately post treatment and on days 2, 3, and 7 following treatment) All POS questions were scored from 0 to 4 with lower scores requiring less clinical attention than higher scores (NCT01384877)
Timeframe: At most 6 weeks (duration of study)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselinePeriod 1Period 2
Lidocaine/Placebo2.131.921.73
Placebo (D5W)/Lidocaine1.671.711.47

[back to top]

Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, Have You Been Feeling Depressed?

Effect of Lidocaine infusion on Quality Of Life parameters as measured by the Patient Outcome Scale (POS) Questionnaire Baseline scores were compared to an average post treatment score (taken immediately post treatment and on days 2, 3, and 7 following treatment) All POS questions were scored from 0 to 4 with lower scores requiring less clinical attention than higher scores (NCT01384877)
Timeframe: At most 6 weeks (duration of study)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselinePeriod 1Period 2
Lidocaine/Placebo1.671.551.46
Placebo (D5W)/Lidocaine1.251.551.23

[back to top]

Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, Have You Felt Good About Yourself as a Person?

Effect of Lidocaine infusion on Quality Of Life parameters as measured by the Patient Outcome Scale (POS) Questionnaire Baseline scores were compared to an average post treatment score (taken immediately post treatment and on days 2, 3, and 7 following treatment) All POS questions were scored from 0 to 4 with lower scores requiring less clinical attention than higher scores (NCT01384877)
Timeframe: At most 6 weeks (duration of study)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselinePeriod 1Period 2
Lidocaine/Placebo1.731.731.78
Placebo (D5W)/Lidocaine1.751.521.37

[back to top]

Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, How Much Time do You Feel Has Been Wasted on Appointments Relating to Your Healthcare e.g. Waiting Around for Transport or Repeating Tests?

Effect of Lidocaine infusion on Quality Of Life parameters as measured by the Patient Outcome Scale (POS) Questionnaire Baseline scores were compared to an average post treatment score (taken immediately post treatment and on days 2, 3, and 7 following treatment) All POS questions were scored from 0 to 4 with lower scores requiring less clinical attention than higher scores (NCT01384877)
Timeframe: At most 6 weeks (duration of study)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselinePeriod 1Period 2
Lidocaine/Placebo0.670.650.55
Placebo (D5W)/Lidocaine0.500.770.43

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Reduction in Worst Pain Intensity or Reduction in 24hr Opioid Dose of at Least 30% Without Worsening of Pain Scores

"The primary outcomes measure is a binary variable indicating whether lidocaine caused a reduction in cancer pain within 48 hours of infusion and lasting a minimum of 7 days. Lidocaine will be considered to have caused reduction in cancer pain if the subject had either one of the following episodes and lasting a minimum of 7 days:~A 2-point reduction in severity of pain as assessed by the worst pain score in the last 24 hours (question 3) of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI), compared to the BPI pain score at baseline.~Or:~≥30% reduction in 24-hour opioid dose." (NCT01384877)
Timeframe: 7 days

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Period 1Period 2
Lidocaine/Placebo12
Placebo (D5W)/Lidocaine21

[back to top]

Quality of Life Question: Over the Past 3 Days, Have Any of Your Family or Friends Been Anxious or Worried About You?

Effect of Lidocaine infusion on Quality Of Life parameters as measured by the Patient Outcome Scale (POS) Questionnaire Baseline scores were compared to an average post treatment score (taken immediately post treatment and on days 2, 3, and 7 following treatment) All POS questions were scored from 0 to 4 with lower scores requiring less clinical attention than higher scores (NCT01384877)
Timeframe: At most 6 weeks (duration of study)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselinePeriod 1Period 2
Lidocaine/Placebo1.601.531.50
Placebo (D5W)/Lidocaine1.671.711.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R) at 30 Minutes After IV Cannulation

"The Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R) is numerical self-report measure of pain intensity developed for children to score the sensation of pain from 0-10. Pictures of 6 cartoon faces ranging from neutral expression of no pain (0) to very much pain (10)." (NCT01394250)
Timeframe: Baseline and 30 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Buzzy®-3.544
Topical Lidocaine 4% Cream-3.436

[back to top]

Comparison of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale (FLACC) Score Immediately After IV Cannulation Between Groups

The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale or FLACC scale is a measurement used to assess pain for children between the ages of 2 months and 7 years or individuals that are unable to communicate their pain. The scale is scored in a range of 0-10 with 0 representing no pain. The scale has five criteria, which are each assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2. The FLACC score was completed immediately after IV cannulation by a member of the clinical care team who was not part of the study. During initial trial design, the goal was to collect FLACC score pre and post cannulation; however, it was decided prior to enrollment that FLACC score would not be collected pre cannulation, only post. (NCT01394250)
Timeframe: Up to 5 minutes after IV Cannulation

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Buzzy®0.667
Topical Lidocaine 4% Cream0.333

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Survive From the Time of Cardiac Arrest to Hospital Discharge

Patients may die in the field (outside of the hospital at the time of the cardiac arrest), at the emergency room, in the hospital, or they are discharged alive from the hospital. (NCT01401647)
Timeframe: Patients will be followed from the time of the cardiac arrest until death, hospital discharge, or December 31, 2015, whichever occurs first.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Amiodarone237
Lidocaine233
Normal Saline222

[back to top]

Number of Participants Scoring at or Below a 3 on the MRS Scale

Neurologic status at discharge will be assessed using the modified Rankin Score (MRS). A higher value indicates a worse outcome. 0-No symptoms at all; 1-No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities, 2-Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance, 3-Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4-Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, 5-Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6-Dead (NCT01401647)
Timeframe: Patients will be followed from the time of the cardiac arrest until death, hospital discharge, or December 31, 2015, whichever occurs first.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Amiodarone182
Lidocaine172
Normal Saline175

[back to top]

Physical Examination of the Shoulder Scale

From Steven W. Brose, DO, Michael L. Boninger, MD, Bradley Fullerton, MD, Thane McCann, MD, From: Jennifer L. Collinger, BSE, Bradley G. Impink, BSE, Trevor A. Dyson-Hudson, MD Shoulder ultrasound abnormalities, physical examination findings, and pain in manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008 Nov; 89:2086-93, appendix 1 12 parameters of shoulder examination: Biceps tendon/bicipital groove tenderness, Supraspinatus tendon/greater tuberosity tenderness Acromioclavicular joint tenderness Resisted external rotation. Resisted internal rotation. Supraspinatus test. Painful Arc Test. Neer impingement sign. Hawkins-Kennedy impingement sign. O'Brien Active Compression Test for AC Joint Pathology O'Brien Active Compression Test for Labral Pathology impingement sign. each test scored 0 = no pain, 1 = tenderness, 2 = pain. All 12 scores added. Range 0-24. Higher scores = more pathology (NCT01402011)
Timeframe: 20 minutes before first injection on first day of patient visit and at 3 months

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 months
.1% Lidocaine in Ligaments and Tendons13.110.7
.1% Lidocaine Subcutaneous1312.9
25% Dextrose in Ligaments and Tendons13.211.4

[back to top]

Visual Analog Pain Scale 0= no Pain 10 = Maximum Pain

Subject marks his pain level at rest, at work, doing sports on a 10 cm scale. The maximum pain level among the 3 different activities was recorded. (NCT01402011)
Timeframe: 20 minutes before first injection on first day of patient visit

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
25% Dextrose in Shoulder Entheses7.3
.1% Lidocaine in Shoulder Entheses6.9
.1% Lidocaine Subcu. Above Shouldr Enth.6.9

[back to top]

Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire

http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/assets/images/pdfs/DASH_quest06.pdf 30 questions assessing ability to use shoulder in everyday activities, each question scored 1 to 5, where one is normal, no problem and five is unable to perform. No data was collected at 9 months. The score ranges from 30 to 150. Higher scores represent worse outcomes. (NCT01402011)
Timeframe: 20 minutes before the first injection and at 3 months

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 months
.1% Lidocaine in Ligaments and Tendons71.354.7
.1% Lidocaine Subcutaneous69.661
25% Dextrose in Ligaments and Tendons72.461.3

[back to top]

Rotator Cuff Ultrasound, Ultrasound Shoulder Pathology Rating Scale

"From Brose et al. shoulder ultrasound abnormalities, physical examination findings, and pain in manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008 Nov, 89: 2086-93 appendix 2. rates biceps tendinopathy (0-6), supraspinatus tendinopathy (0-5), greater tuberosity the cortical surface (0-3), dynamics supraspinatus impingement (0-3), dynamic subscapularis/ biceps/ coracoid impingement (0-3). The total score ranged from 0 to 20 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. The change was calculated by taking the final score - the baseline score." (NCT01402011)
Timeframe: 20 minutes before first injection on first day of patient visit and at on average 9.4 months

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baselinechange at 9.4 +/- 2.2 months
.1% Lidocaine in Ligaments and Tendons4.3-0.6
.1% Lidocaine Subcutaneous4.3-0.6
25% Dextrose in Ligaments and Tendons4.0-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Maximum Pain Score at 9 Months

Participants were asked about pain at rest, at work, doing sports. The maximum pain reported on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (extreme pain) was recorded for each participant. Maximum of pain scores rest, work, sport recorded. Calculated as pain at baseline - pain at 9 months. (NCT01402011)
Timeframe: baseline and 9 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
25% Dextrose in Ligaments and Tendons2.9
.1% Lidocaine in Ligaments and Tendons1.8
.1% Lidocaine Subcutaneous1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Visual Analog Pain Scale at 3 Months

Subject marks his pain level at rest, at work, doing sports on a 10 cm scale. Maximum of pain scores rest, work, sport recorded. Calculated as pain at baseline - pain at 3 months. VAS scale is from 0 = no pain to 10 = maximum pain (NCT01402011)
Timeframe: baseline and three months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
25% Dextrose in Ligaments and Tendons3.0
.1% Lidocaine in Ligaments and Tendons2.7
.1% Lidocaine Subcutaneous2.7

[back to top]

Nine Month Satisfaction Questionnaire

Phone call asking how satisfied were they with their treatment 10 = extremely satisfied, 0 = extremely dissatisfied ) (NCT01402011)
Timeframe: Nine months after first injection treatment appointment

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
25% Dextrose in Ligaments and Tendons6.7
.1% Lidocaine in Ligaments and Tendons4.7
.1% Lidocaine Subcutaneous3.9

[back to top]

Time to Peak Methemoglobin Blood Levels

The length of time between the administration of local anesthetic (Prilocaine and Lidocaine Groups) or start of restorative dental procedures (No local anesthetic Group) and the time at which the maximum methemoglobin blood level is observed. (NCT01402869)
Timeframe: Measured at 10 second intervals during dental treatment for an average of 2 hours

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Prilocaine62.73
Lidocaine57.50
No Local Anesthetic29.50

[back to top]

Peak Methemoglobin Blood Levels

The maximum percentage of methemoglobin in blood (NCT01402869)
Timeframe: Measured at 10 second intervals during dental treatment for an average of 2 hours

Interventionpercentage of methemoglobin in blood (Mean)
Prilocaine3.55
Lidocaine1.63
No Local Anesthetic1.60

[back to top]

Delta Methemoglobin Blood Level

Change in percentage of methemoglobin in blood from baseline level to peak level (NCT01402869)
Timeframe: From administration of local anesthetic or start of restorative procedures to time at which maximum methemoglobin blood level was documented during dental treatment for an average of 2 hours

Interventionpercentage of methemoglobin in blood (Mean)
Prilocaine2.73
Lidocaine0.78
No Local Anesthetic0.76

[back to top]

Injection Pain Score (Median)

"A Likert visual analog scale will be used to document each study participant's level of pain experienced during injection of the cervical block.~Within 30 minutes of completion of the procedure and after instruction by the investigators, women reported the intensity of their pain by marking single lines across 100-mm Likert visual analog scales. Scales did not include hashmarks or internal descriptors, as these have been shown to bias responses and diminish reliability.~Patient marks on 100-mm Likert scale lines were measured, and a score was determined by the length marked off in millimeters. Patients who wrote no pain were considered to have marked 0 mm." (NCT01405768)
Timeframe: Within 30 minutes of completion of the procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Lidocaine Arm26
Buffered Lidocaine18

[back to top]

Injection Pain Score (Mean)

"A Likert visual analog scale will be used to document each study participant's level of pain experienced during injection of the cervical block.~Within 30 minutes of completion of the procedure and after instruction by the investigators, women reported the intensity of their pain by marking single lines across 100-mm Likert visual analog scales. Scales did not include hashmarks or internal descriptors, as these have been shown to bias responses and diminish reliability.~Patient marks on 100-mm Likert scale lines were measured, and a score was determined by the length marked off in millimeters. Patients who wrote no pain were considered to have marked 0 mm." (NCT01405768)
Timeframe: Within 30 minutes of completion of procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine Arm25
Buffered Lidocaine19

[back to top]

Overall LEEP Procedure Pain Including Procedural Pain and Cramping (Median)

"A Likert visual analog scale will be used to determine the overall pain experienced by each study participant including injection pain, procedural pain, and cramping.~Within 30 minutes of completion of the procedure and after instruction by the investigators, women reported the intensity of their pain by marking single lines across 100-mm Likert visual analog scales. Scales did not include hashmarks or internal descriptors, as these have been shown to bias responses and diminish reliability.~Patient marks on 100-mm Likert scale lines were measured, and a score was determined by the length marked off in millimeters. Patients who wrote no pain were considered to have marked 0 mm." (NCT01405768)
Timeframe: Within 30 minutes of completion of procedure

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Injection painProcedure painCramping pain
Buffered Lidocaine181314
Lidocaine Arm262519

[back to top]

Overall LEEP Procedure Pain Including Procedural Pain and Cramping (Mean)

"A Likert visual analog scale will be used to determine the overall pain experienced by each study participant including injection pain, procedural pain, and cramping.~Within 30 minutes of completion of the procedure and after instruction by the investigators, women reported the intensity of their pain by marking single lines across 100-mm Likert visual analog scales. Scales did not include hashmarks or internal descriptors, as these have been shown to bias responses and diminish reliability.~Patient marks on 100-mm Likert scale lines were measured, and a score was determined by the length marked off in millimeters. Patients who wrote no pain were considered to have marked 0 mm." (NCT01405768)
Timeframe: Within 30 minutes of completion of procedure

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Injection painProcedure painCramping pain
Buffered Lidocaine191918
Lidocaine Arm252719

[back to top]

Pain Score Assessed Immediately Following IUD Insertion

"Using a visual analog scale, women will report their level of pain pre-procedure, after tenaculum placement, and post-procedure (following IUD insertion).The entirety of the procedure should last no more than 5-10 minutes. The pain score is assessed at the 3 timepoints within that 10 minute window. No additional followup is required.~Range: 0-10 (0= no pain, 10=worst pain)" (NCT01411995)
Timeframe: Immediately following IUD insertion

Interventionunits on visual analog scale (Median)
2% Lidocaine Gel5
Water Based Lubricant6

[back to top]

Tenaculum Pain

The primary outcome was pain at the time of tenaculum placement. Patient asked to pain scale using 100mm Visual Analog Scale (0mm=no pain, 100mm=worst pain of my life) during after tenaculum placement. (NCT01421641)
Timeframe: After tenaculum placement

Interventionmm (Mean)
Intracervical Lidocaine Injection12.3
Topical Lidocaine Gel36.6

[back to top]

Tenaculum Placement Satisfaction

Satisfaction with overall tenaculum placement procedure. Subjects asked to answer their overall satisfaction with the pain control. Subjects asked to complete 100mm Visual Analog Scale (0mm=not at all satisfied to 100mm=very satisfied) (NCT01421641)
Timeframe: After placement of the tenaculum

Interventionmm (Mean)
Intracervical Lidocaine Injection79.9
Topical Lidocaine Gel74.6

[back to top]

Intervention Pain

Pain with the intervention (injection or gel application). Subjects are asked to complete pain scale using a 100mm Visual Analog Scale (0mm=no pain and 100mm=worst pain of my life) (NCT01421641)
Timeframe: after application of randomized intervention

Interventionmm (Mean)
Intracervical Lidocaine Injection20.4
Topical Lidocaine Gel5.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Improved Subjects at 2 Weeks After Treatment as Assessed by Use of Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS)

Esthetic improvement was evaluated by using Global Esthetic Improvement Scale. GEIS was evaluated by comparing current photos with pre-treatment photos and using a 5-graded scale (worse/no change/somewhat improved/much improved/very much improved). A clinically significant global esthetic improvement was defined as a score of somewhat improved, much improved or very much improved. GEIS was assessed by the Investigator and the subject. Each cheek/study product was evaluated separately. GEIS was assessed at the time points 2 weeks, 3 months, 2 weeks after re-treatment and 6, 9 and 12 months after first treatment. (NCT01431755)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Restylane SubQ, subject GEIS, improvedRestylane SubQ, investigator GEIS, improvedRestylane SubQ Lidocain, subject GEIS, improvedRestylane SubQ Lidocaine, invest. GEIS, improved
Restylane SubQ/Restylane SubQ Lidocaine90.796.392.6100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Step Improvement on Medicis Midface Volume Scale (MMVS) at 2 Weeks

The severity of midface volume loss or midface contour deficiency was assessed by the investigators using a 4-graded scale, Medicis Midface Volume Scale -MMVS (1, fairly full; 2, mild loss of fullness; 3, moderate loss, slight hollowing; and 4, substantial loss, clearly apparent hollowing). Each score were exemplified by photographic images on the scale. A one grade decrease in score from screening was defined as a treatment success/improvement.The efficacy in terms of Medicis Midface Volume Scale (MMVS) was assessed by the Investigator per treatment group. The two cheeks were evaluated separately. MMVS was assessed at the time points 2 weeks, 3 months, 2 weeks after re-treatment and 6, 9 and 12 months after first treatment. (NCT01431755)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Restylane SubQ, improved MMVS at 2 weeksRestylane SubQ Lidocaine, improved MMVS at 2 weeks
Restylane SubQ/Restylane SubQ Lidocaine55.659.3

[back to top]

Subject Pain Assessment by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 15 and 120 Minutes After Treatment.

"Pain was assessed during the first 2 hours after the initial injection of the study products using a 100 mm VAS. The endpoints of the scale were no pain (0 mm) and worst possible pain (100 mm). Pain was assessed at the time points 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after injection." (NCT01431755)
Timeframe: 15 and 120 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Restylane SubQ, VAS at 15 minutesRestylane SubQ Lidocaine, VAS at 15 minutesRestylane SubQ, VAS at 120 minutesRestylane SubQ Lidocaine, VAS at 120 minutes
Restylane SubQ/Restylane SubQ Lidocaine28.42.97.31.3

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Reporting Adverse Event

"Adverse Events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, information obtained from signs and symptoms detected during examination, observed by the study personnel or spontaneous reports from the subjects.~All subjects were injected with Restylane SubQ in one cheek and Restylane SubQ Lidocaine in the contralateral cheek." (NCT01431755)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Restylane SubQ/Restylane SubQ Lidocaine41

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Who Assessed Treatment With Restylane SubQ Lidocaine as Least Painful.

When injection of both cheeks was completed, the subject was asked which treatment was least painful (right cheek/left cheek/both cheeks alike). (NCT01431755)
Timeframe: When injection of both cheeks were completed

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Restylane SubQ/Restylane SubQ Lidocaine100

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Patients With Laryngospasm Postoperatively

"There were 4 scores of laryngospasm:~0 = No Laryngospasm~= Stridor or partial laryngospasm~= Complete Laryngospasm~= Cyanosis" (NCT01445847)
Timeframe: within first 15 minutes post-dose

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lidocaine0
Placebo7

[back to top]

Pain Scores Throughout Procedure at Various Time Points

"Distance (mm) from the left of the 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS anchors: 0=none, 100 mm= worst imaginable) recorded at various points throughout procedure:~prior to medication (baseline)~after speculum insertion~with placement of PCB~with cervical dilation~with aspiration~30 minutes post-operatively" (NCT01466491)
Timeframe: up to several hours

,,,
Interventionmm (Mean)
Prior to medication (baseline)After speculum insertionWith placement of PCBWith cervical dilationWith aspiration30 minutes post-operatively
2-site Injection4.8427.3155.3168.4174.0522.37
4-site Injection7.6529.3558.8959.7667.7526.27
4-Site PCB Followed by 3-minute Wait4.229.360.055.672.127.3
4-site PCB Followed by no Wait630.358.363.269.424.2

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Pain

To determine whether varying paracervical block techniques affect patient perception of pain. Pain is measured as mm distance from the left of the 100-mm visual analogue (VAS) scale with the anchors 0 = none, 100 mm = worst imaginable (reflecting magnitude of pain) and recorded immediately after completion of cervical dilation. (NCT01466491)
Timeframe: after completion of cervical dilation

Interventionmm (Mean)
4-site Injection60
2-site Injection68
4-Site PCB Followed by 3-minute Wait56
4-site PCB Followed by no Wait63

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Voiding Frequency

Participants recorded Voiding Frequency in a 72 hour voiding log at Day 7, 14, 28 and 42. Lower numbers of voiding frequency is the best. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01475253)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 7, 14, 28 and 42

,
InterventionVoids (Mean)
Change from Baseline at Day 7Change from Baseline at Day 14Change from Baseline at Day 28Change from Baseline at Day 42
LiRIS® 400 Mg-Randomized Study-7.3-8.8-9.3-9.8
LiRIS® Placebo-Randomized Study-1.1-5.8-8.4-7.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Participant Reported Bladder Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 14

Participant reported symptom of bladder pain in the prior 24 hours using a 10 centimeter horizontal line Pain Visual Analog Scale recorded in a diary. Participants were instructed to to put a mark on the line at the point that best described their bladder pain with 0 (far left on the line) reflecting no pain and 10 (far right on the line) reflecting worse possible pain. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01475253)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14

Interventioncentimeters (Mean)
LiRIS® 400 Mg-Randomized Study-0.81
LiRIS® Placebo-Randomized Study-0.45

[back to top]

Change Form Baseline in O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICSI) Score

Participants answered four questions about bladder/voiding symptoms over the past month. 2 questions were on a scale of 0=Not at all to 5=Almost always, 1 question on a scale of 0=Not at all to 5=5 or more times per night and 1 questions from 0=Not at all to 4=Almost always for a total possible score of 0 (best) to19 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement (NCT01475253)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 7, 14, 28 and 42

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change from Baseline at Day 7Change from Baseline at Day 14Change from Baseline at Day 28Change from Baseline at Day 42
LiRIS® 400 Mg-Randomized Study-2.39-2.02-2.93-2.83
LiRIS® Placebo-Randomized Study-2.00-1.97-2.87-2.32

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI) Score

Participants answered four questions about how bothersome their symptoms were over the past month using a 5 point scale: 1=No problem to 4=Big problem for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 16 worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01475253)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 7, 14, 28 and 42

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change from Baseline at Day 7Change from Baseline at Day 14Change from Baseline at Day 28Change from Baseline at Day 42
LiRIS® 400 Mg-Randomized Study-2.24-2.33-2.98-2.48
LiRIS® Placebo-Randomized Study-1.54-1.62-2.23-1.58

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Urinary Urgency as Assessed by VAS

"Urinary urgency was defined as an immediate unstoppable urge to urinate which may be due to a sudden involuntary contraction of the muscular wall of the bladder and may be accompanied by discomfort in the bladder. Participants reported symptom of urinary urgency in the last 24 hours using a Urgency Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The Urgency VAS consists of a 10 centimeter (cm) horizontal line with the words No Urgency (best) at the left end (0 cm) and the words Urgency as bad as you can imagine (worst) at the right end (10 cm). Participants were instructed to complete the Pain VAS by marking the spot on the line that corresponded to their urinary urgency. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement." (NCT01475253)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 7, 14, 28 and 42

,
Interventioncentimeters (Mean)
Change from Baseline at Day 7Change from Baseline at Day 14Change from Baseline at Day 28Change from Baseline at Day 42
LiRIS® 400 Mg-Randomized Study0.66-0.76-1.01-0.30
LiRIS® Placebo-Randomized Study-1.45-1.00-1.77-0.84

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Cystoscopic Examination Findings

Cystoscopic examinations were performed at Baseline and Day 14. The investigator assessed the urethra and bladder for the following: visibility of ureters, stricture, erythema, presence and number of Hunner's lesion(s) and the extent of erythema. For sites with the capability, videography or high resolution digital photographs of the bladder were taken. The findings at Day 14 were compared to the findings at Baseline and were reported as Improvement, Worsening or No Change. (NCT01475253)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bladder Mucosal Erythema:ImprovementBladder Mucosal Erythema:WorseningBladder Mucosal Erythema:No ChangeBladder Mucosal Erythema:Not DoneHunner's Lesions:ImprovementHunner's Lesions:WorseningHunner's Lesions:No ChangeStricture:ImprovementStricture:WorseningStricture:No Change
LiRIS® 400 Mg-Randomized Study3513502229600100
LiRIS® Placebo-Randomized Study1511704928900100

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders Using the Global Response Assessment (GRA)

Participants assessed their response to treatment using a seven item scale from Markedly improved to Markedly worse. A responder was defined as a participant who rated their symptoms as either Moderately or Markedly improved. (NCT01475253)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 7, 14, 28 and 42

,
InterventionPercentage of Responders (Number)
Day 7Day 14Day 28Day 42
LiRIS® 400 Mg-Randomized Study2417712
LiRIS® Placebo-Randomized Study18202521

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Participant Reported Bladder Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 7

Participant reported symptom of bladder pain in the prior 24 hours using a 10 centimeter (cm) horizontal line Pain Visual Analog Scale recorded in a diary. Participants were instructed to to put a mark on the line at the point that best described their bladder pain with 0 (far left on the line) reflecting no pain and 10 (far right on the line) reflecting worse possible pain. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01475253)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 7

Interventioncentimeters (Mean)
LiRIS® 400 Mg-Randomized Study-1.25
LiRIS® Placebo-Randomized Study-0.84

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Participant Reported Bladder Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 42

Participant reported symptom of bladder pain in the prior 24 hours using a 10 centimeter horizontal line Pain Visual Analog Scale recorded in a diary. Participants were instructed to to put a mark on the line at the point that best described their bladder pain with 0 (far left on the line) reflecting no pain and 10 (far right on the line) reflecting worse possible pain. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01475253)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 42

Interventioncentimeters (Mean)
LiRIS® 400 Mg-Randomized Study-0.89
LiRIS® Placebo-Randomized Study-1.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Participant Reported Bladder Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ay Day 28

Participant reported symptom of bladder pain in the prior 24 hours using a 10 centimeter horizontal line Pain Visual Analog Scale recorded in a diary. Participants were instructed to to put a mark on the line at the point that best described their bladder pain with 0 (far left on the line) reflecting no pain and 10 (far right on the line) reflecting worse possible pain. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01475253)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 28

Interventioncentimeters (Mean)
LiRIS® 400 Mg-Randomized Study-0.92
LiRIS® Placebo-Randomized Study-1.36

[back to top]

Likert Four Elements Scale to Evaluate the Satisfaction of Endoscopist

Define as easiness to reach the expected objectives for endoscopy without patient interference: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, unsatisfied. (NCT01489891)
Timeframe: 8 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
UnsatisfactoryNeutralSatisfactoryVery satisfactory
Lidocaine Group6.810.125.457.6
Placebo01518.366.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events in Both Groups

Hypoxemia (SatO2<90% or >4% if the baseline was under 93%), bradycardia (<60 bpm or >10% from baseline), hypotension (systolic blood pressure under 90 mmHg and/or diastolic 60 mmHg), anaphylactic reaction, aspiration o methaemoglobinemia. (NCT01489891)
Timeframe: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 hours postprocedure

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lidocaine Group32.2
Placebo26.7

[back to top]

Rate of Administration of Propofol 1% Required to Obtain Uniform Sedation During Endoscopy

The propofol will be administered by an expert anaesthetist in repeated bolus (10-20 mg each 30-60 seconds) after an initial induction dosage (0.5-0.6 mg/kg ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) I-II or 0.25-0.35 mg/kg ASA III-IV) to obtain an uniform level of sedation (OAAS 3 and bispectral index (BIS) 70-80) and adequate perceived patient tolerance (no gag-reflex, cough, sudden movements). (NCT01489891)
Timeframe: 8 months

Interventionmcg/kg/min (Mean)
Lidocaine Group310.7
Placebo280.1

[back to top]

Likert Four Elements Scale to Evaluate the Satisfaction of Anaesthetist

Define as easiness to reach and maintain the level of sedation and patient comfort during endoscopy: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, unsatisfied. (NCT01489891)
Timeframe: 8 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
UnsatisfactoryNeutralSatisfactoryVery satisfactory
Lidocaine Group5.816.915.262.7
Placebo016.720.363.3

[back to top]

Anesthetic Success Rate of an IANB With Articaine

Success rate of an IANB with articaine using a conventional IANB technique (NCT01496846)
Timeframe: 15 min after injection

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
IANB Articaine - 1st Molar27
IANB Articaine - 2nd Molar23

[back to top]

Anesthetic Success Rate of Supplemental Infiltration Injection

Following an unsuccessful IANB, supplemental infiltration anesthesia with either articaine or lidocaine was given to achieve complete pulpal anesthesia (NCT01496846)
Timeframe: 5 min after injection

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
IANB Articaine and SUP Articaine - 1st Molar22
IANB Articaine and SUP Articaine - 2nd Molar25
IANB Articaine and SUP Lidocaine - 1st Molar23
IANB Articaine and SUP Lidocaine - 2nd Molar12

[back to top]

The Change in the Average Finger Temperature From Baseline to Post-intervention.

(NCT01508832)
Timeframe: 30 minutes prior and 240 minutes post intervention.

Interventiondegrees centigrade (Mean)
Lidocaine-1.35
Bupivacaine0.93

[back to top]

"Pain Intensity on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The Scale Had Values From 0-100, Where 0 Represents no Pain and 100 Was the Worst Pain Imaginable."

"the primary hypothesis was that the lidoderm 5% patch was expected to decrease pain intensity post treatment greater than placebo patch.~A lower value on the 0-100 scale is considered to represent less pain. Higher values represent more pain. Greater than 20%-30% decrease in pain is considered clinically meaningful." (NCT01515540)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionpeak pain intensity (Mean)
Lidocaine51.0
Control51.6

[back to top]

Complications Including Any Change in Vital Signs That Requires Intervention by the Sedation Team, as Well as Post-LP Headache From Sedation With or Without EMLA Cream

Each patient's parent (and/or the patient) will be contacted by telephone within one week of the lumbar puncture (or in person if the next clinic visit is within one week) to ask if the patient had any headache after the lumbar puncture, and if they had any other complications. (NCT01516684)
Timeframe: Within one week of the LP

InterventionProbability of experiencing headache (Mean)
Arm A (EMLA)0.194
Arm B (Placebo)0.289

[back to top]

Complications Including Any Change in Vital Signs That Requires Intervention by the Sedation Team, Post-LP Back Pain From Sedation With or Without EMLA Cream

Each patient's parent (and/or the patient) will be contacted by telephone within one week of the lumbar puncture (or in person if the next clinic visit is within one week) to ask if the patient had any back pain after the lumbar puncture, and if they had any other complications. (NCT01516684)
Timeframe: Within one week of the LP

InterventionProbability of experiencing back pain (Mean)
Arm A (EMLA)0.211
Arm B (Placebo)0.250

[back to top]

Traumatic Lumbar Punctures After EMLA Cream or Placebo Cream Administration

Traumatic lumbar puncture is defined as lumbar puncture in which cerebrospinal fluid contains at least 10 red blood cells (RBCs) per microliter and bloody lumbar as one in which the cerebrospinal fluid contained at least 500 red blood cells (RBCs) per microliter. (NCT01516684)
Timeframe: 20 minutes after lumbar puncture

,
InterventionTrials (Count of Units)
AtraumaticTraumaticBloody
Arm A (EMLA)6361
Arm B (Placebo)5754

[back to top]

Level of Movement (no Movement, Minor Movement, Major Movement, Other) After EMLA Cream or Placebo Cream Administration

(NCT01516684)
Timeframe: At the time of LP insertion

,
InterventionTrials (Count of Units)
No movementMinor movementMajor movementOther
Arm A (EMLA)507810
Arm B (Placebo)2912279

[back to top]

Total Dose of Propofol Administered to Each Patient

Analyzed using descriptive statistics and mixed model regression methods. Raw mean total dose administered and raw percentage of times additional propofol was administered will be presented by sedation group treating each event (sedation with lumbar puncture) as the unit. T-test and chi-square tests will be performed as appropriate. (NCT01516684)
Timeframe: 20 minutes after sedation

Interventionmg/kg (Least Squares Mean)
Arm A (EMLA)2.94
Arm B (Placebo)3.22

[back to top]

Need for Pain Medication up to 7 Days

Number of women taking pain medication for at least one day following IUD insertion (NCT01534520)
Timeframe: 7 days post-insertion

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Group 1: Intravaginal 2% Lidocaine Gel24
Group 2: Intravaginal Placebo Gel27

[back to top]

Percentage of IUDs Considered by Physicians Easy to Insert

"The physician who conducted the study visit and IUD insertion was asked about the difficulty/ease in placing the IUD immediately following the procedure and the percentage of IUD insertions considered to be easy was calculated for each study group." (NCT01534520)
Timeframe: Directly after IUD insertion

Interventionpercentage of insertions declared easy (Number)
Group 1: Intravaginal 2% Lidocaine Gel87
Group 2: Intravaginal Placebo Gel64

[back to top]

To Evaluate Patient Experience of Self-inserting the Intravaginal Study Gel Prior to IUD

"Number of participants who rated self-application of study gel as some what easy or very easy on Likert scale" (NCT01534520)
Timeframe: After inserting the gel but prior to IUD insertion

Interventionparticipants who found gel easy to use (Number)
Group 1: Intravaginal 2% Lidocaine Gel29
Group 2: Intravaginal Placebo Gel29

[back to top]

Change in Pain From Baseline to IUD Insertion

To assess change in pain from baseline to IUD insertion measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst pain in patient's life). This pain assessment was prior to (baseline) and at the time of IUD insertion following vaginal self-administration of study gel (either 2% lidocaine gel or placebo gel). (NCT01534520)
Timeframe: change in pain score from baseline (before IUD insertion) to time of IUD insertion

Interventionchange in visual analog scale score (Median)
Group 1: Intravaginal 2% Lidocaine Gel61
Group 2: Intravaginal Placebo Gel68

[back to top]

Location of Pain in Postmenopausal Dyspareunia

"To determine the specific site of vulvovaginal tenderness in menopausal breast cancer survivors who have entry dyspareunia. Examine the vulvar vestibule with a swab test to determine locations and severity of touch tenderness. Eight sites were evaluated around the vaginal opening and there location was in reference to a clock face. Measured using the Numerical Rating Scale, a scale which measures pain from 0 to 10 with 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain you have ever felt." (NCT01539317)
Timeframe: Enrollment visit

,
Interventionunits on a scale from 0 to 10 (Median)
1 o'clock11 o'clock12 o'clock3 o'clock4 o'clock8 o'clock9 o'clock6 o'clock
Topical Liquid Lidocaine00000000
Topical Saline00134452

[back to top]

Prevention of Entry Dyspareunia With Non-hormonal Therapy

"Mean intercourse pain reported by subjects using the Numerical Rating Scale pain ratings (range 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being worst possible pain). Testing was during weeks 0-4 (Phase II) (with blinded randomization for placebo vs active intervention medication) and testing was during weeks 5-12 (Phase III) (with open-label active medication for 8 weeks after completing the blinded 4 weeks). Subjects agreed to try penetration twice per week and score their pain using the Numerical Rating Scale pain ratings.The scores were averaged during each phase." (NCT01539317)
Timeframe: During Phase II (0-4 weeks) and during Phase III (5-12 weeks)

,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Phase IIPhase III
Open LabelNA0.48
Topical Liquid Lidocaine1.040.45
Topical Saline5.30.57

[back to top]

Improvement of Quality of Sexual Life - Visit 1

To determine whether women's quality of sexual life is improved by use of this local therapy to prevent pain with intercourse. Measured by average scores on the Sexual Function Questionnaire. There are 8 domains measured in the Sexual Function Questionnaire each asking for a score for the prior 30 days: Desire (score range 5-31; ≥23 considered normal function), Arousal-sensation (score range 4-20; ≥14 considered normal function), Arousal-lubrication (score ranges 2-10; ≥8 considered normal function), Arousal-cognitive (score range 2-10; ≥8 considered normal function), Orgasm (score range 1-15; ≥12 considered normal function), Pain (2-15; ≥12 considered normal function), Enjoyment (score range 6-30; ≥23 considered normal function) and Partner (score range 2-10; ≥8 considered normal function). (NCT01539317)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Enrollment)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
DesireArousal SensationArousal LubricationArousal CognitiveOrgasmPainEnjoymentPartner
Topical Liquid Lidocaine13.879.152.974.827.626.2917.018.13
Topical Saline11.918.443.924.285.706.0415.307.78

[back to top]

Improvement of Quality of Sexual Life - Visit 2

To determine whether women's quality of sexual life is improved by use of this local therapy to prevent pain with intercourse. Measured by averaged scores on the Sexual Function Questionnaire. There are 8 domains measured in the Sexual Function Questionnaire each asking for a score for the prior 30 days: Desire (score range 5-31; ≥23 considered normal function), Arousal-sensation (score range 4-20; ≥14 considered normal function), Arousal-lubrication (score ranges 2-10; ≥8 considered normal function), Arousal-cognitive (score range 2-10; ≥8 considered normal function), Orgasm (score range 1-15; ≥12 considered normal function), Pain (2-15; ≥12 considered normal function), Enjoyment (score range 6-30; ≥23 considered normal function) and Partner (score range 2-10; ≥8 considered normal function). (NCT01539317)
Timeframe: Visit 2 (Week 4)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
DesireArousal SensationArousal LubricationArousal CognitiveOrgasmPainEnjoymentPartner
Topical Liquid Lidocaine16.0911.214.185.999.0510.5019.368.68
Topical Saline148.143.594.695.077.9616.98.62

[back to top]

Improvement of Quality of Sexual Life - Visit 3

To determine whether women's quality of sexual life is improved by use of this local therapy to prevent pain with intercourse. Measured by average scores on the Sexual Function Questionnaire. There are 8 domains measured in the Sexual Function Questionnaire each asking for a score for the prior 30 days: Desire (score range 5-31; ≥23 considered normal function), Arousal-sensation (score range 4-20; ≥14 considered normal function), Arousal-lubrication (score ranges 2-10; ≥8 considered normal function), Arousal-cognitive (score range 2-10; ≥8 considered normal function), Orgasm (score range 1-15; ≥12 considered normal function), Pain (2-15; ≥12 considered normal function), Enjoyment (score range 6-30; ≥23 considered normal function) and Partner (score range 2-10; ≥8 considered normal function). (NCT01539317)
Timeframe: Visit 3 (End of Study)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
DesireArousal SensationArousal LubricationArousal CognitiveOrgasmPainEnjoymentPartner
Topical Liquid Lidocaine18.3213.155.27.059.511.6722.519.36
Topical Saline17.7910.894.795.746.9511.1820.908.95

[back to top]

Pain

"A horizontal 100 mm anchored Visual Analogue Scale (0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain) was used by the adult caregiver and the orthopedic technician to document the pain associated with Perc Pin removal for participant children.~The Oucher Scale was used to assess pain intensity in participant children and included two separate scales. 6 photographs were assigned scores of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 (in increasing increments of pain), such that these would be the scores averaged for participants unable to count by number. Children able to count to 100 by ones or tens and who could identify the larger of 2 numbers used the second scale; a vertical numeric one (0-100) that was printed next to the faces." (NCT01542125)
Timeframe: Before the application of Liposomal Lidocaine and immediately after Pin Perc removal, approximately 30 minutes

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pre-Pin Removal - Children, Oucher - Mean in mmPre-Pin Removal - Parent, VAS - Mean in mmPre-Pin Removal - Orthopedic Tec, VAS - Mean in mmPost-Pin Removal - Children, Oucher - Mean in mmPost-Pin Removal - Parent, VAS - Mean in mmPos-Pin Removal - Orthopedic Tec, VAS - Mean in mm
Liposomal Lidocaine Group0.701.040.273.0332.09
Placebo Group0.880.870.382.933.12.06

[back to top]

Percentage of Investigators Satisfied With the Use of Study Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler

The study investigators (injectors) were requested to complete a questionnaire about their satisfaction with the use of study hyaluronic acid dermal filler (Emervel® Volume Lidocaine). The percentage of investigators who agreed to use Emervel® Volume Lidocaine again were reported in this outcome measure. (NCT01545557)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 18 Months after last injection

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
The Study Investigators (Injectors)100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Satisfied or Very Satisfied at 3 Weeks After Last Injection

Participants satisfaction with the overall, full face aesthetic results were assessed by use of participants global satisfaction questionnaire. Participants rated their satisfaction by answering question ; Rate overall, full face aesthetic outcome using the following options: not satisfied, somewhat satisfied, satisfied or very satisfied. Percentage of participants satisfied and very satisfied with the full face aesthetic outcome at 3 weeks after last injection were reported. (NCT01545557)
Timeframe: At 3 Weeks after last injection

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
SatisfiedVery satisfied
Full Face Overall Aesthetic Outcome32.267.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. (NCT01545557)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 18 Months after last injection

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hyaluronic Acid9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Satisfied or Very Satisfied at 18 Months After Last Injection

Participants satisfaction with the overall, full face aesthetic results were assessed by use of participants global satisfaction questionnaire. Participants rated their satisfaction by answering question; rate overall, full face aesthetic outcome using the following options : not satisfied, somewhat satisfied, satisfied or very satisfied. Percentage of participants satisfied and very satisfied with the full-face aesthetic outcome at 18 Months after last injection were reported. (NCT01545557)
Timeframe: At 18 Months after last injection

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
SatisfiedVery satisfied
Full Face Overall Aesthetic Outcome2570

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Volume Loss Assessment

Overall loss of volume on full face was graded on a volume loss scale (VLS) of 0 to 3 by the investigator as follow: 0= normal, 1= evidence of early soft tissue ptosis or atrophy slightly visible, 2=visible depression or descent, 3= severe depression or atrophy. Last injections were given either at baseline or touch-up injections (if needed) on previously injected areas at 3 Weeks after baseline. (NCT01545557)
Timeframe: Baseline and 18 Months after last injection

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Volume loss18 Months After Injection-0.8

[back to top]

Adverse Events

Incidence of adverse events was to be reported during the study period (NCT01545765)
Timeframe: During the study

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lidocaine 7% + Tetracaine 7% Face - First Application Time2
Lidocaine 7% + Tetracaine 7% Face - Second Application Time2
Lidocaine 7% + Tetracaine 7% Thigh - First Application Time2
Lidocaine 7% + Tetracaine 7% Thigh - Second Application Time2

[back to top]

Duration of Anesthesia(Minutes)

Onset and end of anesthesia are evaluated by Pinprick tests. Duration of anesthesia is calculated as: difference between onset and end of anesthesia (minutes). (NCT01545765)
Timeframe: From T0 (product removal) up to T8 hours after product removal

InterventionMinutes (Median)
Lidocaine 7% + Tetracaine 7% Face - First Application Time80
Lidocaine 7% + Tetracaine 7% Face - Second Application Time140
Lidocaine 7% + Tetracaine 7% Thigh - First Application Time0
Lidocaine 7% + Tetracaine 7% Thigh - Second Application Time400

[back to top]

Subject Experience Measured by Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire

Subject satisfaction with treatment, based on a 5-point scale: (1) Delighted, (2) Happy, (3) Neutral, (4) Unhappy, (5) Very Unhappy (NCT01559064)
Timeframe: 3 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Age Group A1.94
Age Group B1.62
Age Group C1.51

[back to top]

Duration of Bowel Care Routine

The duration of bowel care routine will be recorded on two occasions within 28 days. (NCT01567605)
Timeframe: The exact duration of bowel care will be noted on two days within a 28 day period

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Lidocaine Lubricant79.1
Placebo Lubricant57.7

[back to top]

Cardiovascular Symptoms During Bowel Care

Cardiovascular symptoms will be recorded using a questionnaire on two occasions within 28 days. The questionnaire takes approximately 15 minutes to complete. The symptom score rated 13 measures (from 0-4) based on the frequency of symptoms experiences with a possible score ranging from 0-52. High scores denote more severe symtoms. (NCT01567605)
Timeframe: Measured by questionnaire (approximately 15 minutes) after bowel care on two occasions within 28 days.

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine Lubricant7.6
Placebo Lubricant7.0

[back to top]

Heart Beat Abnormalities During Bowel Care (Number of Participants With Heart Beat Abnormalities)

3-lead electrocardiogram will be recorded throughout the duration of bowel care on two occasions within 28 days, for up to one hour on each occasion. (NCT01567605)
Timeframe: Measured continuously during bowel care (approximately one hour) on two occasions within 28 days.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lidocaine Lubricant3
Placebo Lubricant2

[back to top]

Blood Pressure Change During Bowel Care

Beat-to-beat blood pressure will be recorded using a finger blood pressure cuff (Finometer) on two occasions within 28 days, for up to one hour on each occasion. (NCT01567605)
Timeframe: Measured continuously during bowel care (approximately one hour) on two occasions within 28 days.

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Lidocaine Lubricant90.5
Placebo Lubricant80

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Pulpal Anesthesia Success.

An electric pulp tester will be used to test the lower jaw teeth (molars, premolars, and incisors) for anesthesia (numbness) in 4-minute time cycles for 60 minutes. Measurements of less than 80 on the EPT is considered not numb (anesthesia failure). Readings of 80 equate to anesthetic success. (NCT01574807)
Timeframe: 60 minutes per injection sequence.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Mepivacaine + Lidocaine44
Lidocaine + Lidocaine40

[back to top]

Month 3 Overall Lip Fullness Scale Responder Rate Based on Independent Central Reviewer's Assessment

The primary effectiveness variable is the responder rate (percentage of subjects who show ≥ 1-point improvement on the 5-point Lip Fullness Scale (Minimal, Mild, Moderate, Marked, Very Marked) compared to baseline assessment, as determined by Independent Central Reviewer evaluation of 3D photographic images). (NCT01579305)
Timeframe: 3 months

InterventionPercentage of subjects (Number)
Subjects Randomized to Receive VOLBELLA® and Treated34.1
Subjects Randomized to Receive Restylane-L® and Treated29.3

[back to top]

ECGs (QTcB Interval)

Ventricular heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, and QTcB intervals were calculated. (NCT01591616)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1 hour, 2 hour, 4 hour post-dose.

Interventionmilliseconds (Mean)
QTcB Interval, Pre-dose412
QTcB Interval, 1 Hour Post-dose413
QTcB Interval, 2 Hour Post-dose415
QTcB Interval, 4 Hour Post-dose419

[back to top]

ECGs (QT Interval)

Ventricular heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, and QTcB intervals were calculated. (NCT01591616)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1 hour, 2 hour, 4 hour post-dose.

Interventionmilliseconds (Mean)
QT Interval, Pre-dose376
QT Interval, 1 Hour Post-dose384
QT Interval, 2 Hour Post-dose383
QT Interval, 4 Hour Post-dose379

[back to top]

ECGs (QRS Duration)

Ventricular heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, and QTcB intervals were calculated. (NCT01591616)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1 hour, 2 hour, 4 hour post-dose.

Interventionmilliseconds (Mean)
QRS Duration, Pre-dose77
QRS Duration, 1 Hour Post-dose76
QRS Duration, 2 Hour Post-dose75
QRS Duration, 4 Hour Post-dose74

[back to top]

ECGs (PR Interval)

Ventricular heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, and QTcB intervals were calculated. (NCT01591616)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1 hour, 2 hour, 4 hour post-dose.

Interventionmilliseconds (Mean)
PR Interval, Pre-dose148
PR Interval, 1 Hour Post-dose147
PR Interval, 2 Hour Post-dose147
PR Interval, 4 Hour Post-dose139

[back to top]

Vital Signs (Systolic Pressure)

(NCT01591616)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (-20, -10 and 0 min prior to Oraqix administration) and every 10 minutes up to 240 minutes post dose.

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Vital Signs (Systolic), - 20 Minutes Pre-dose110
Vital Signs (Systolic), - 10 Minutes Pre-dose104
Vital Signs (Systolic), 0 Minutes Pre-dose106
Vital Signs (Systolic), 10 Minutes Post-dose115
Vital Signs (Systolic), 20 Minutes Post-dose109
Vital Signs (Systolic), 30 Minutes Post-dose108
Vital Signs (Systolic), 40 Minutes Post-dose106
Vital Signs (Systolic), 50 Minutes Post-dose106
Vital Signs (Systolic), 60 Minutes Post-dose105
Vital Signs (Systolic), 70 Minutes Post-dose106
Vital Signs (Systolic) 80 Minutes Post-dose104
Vital Signs (Systolic), 90 Minutes Post-dose106
Vital Signs (Systolic), 100 Minutes Post-dose106
Vital Signs (Systolic), 110 Minutes Post-dose106
Vital Signs (Systolic), 120 Minutes Post-dose106
Vital Signs (Systolic), 130 Minutes Post-dose105
Vital Signs (Systolic), 140 Minutes Post-dose108
Vital Signs (Systolic), 150 Minutes Post-dose107
Vital Signs (Systolic), 160 Minutes Post-dose105
Vital Signs (Systolic), 170 Minutes Post-dose106
Vital Signs (Systolic), 180 Minutes Post-dose104
Vital Signs (Systolic), 190 Minutes Post-dose103
Vital Signs (Systolic), 200 Minutes Post-dose103
Vital Signs (Systolic), 210 Minutes Post-dose102
Vital Signs (Systolic), 220 Minutes Post-dose104
Vital Signs (Systolic), 230 Minutes Post-dose102
Vital Signs (Systolic), 240 Minutes Post-dose102

[back to top]

Vital Signs (Pulse)

Vital signs (pulse, systolic and diastolic pressure) were measured at pre-dose (-20, -10 and 0 min prior to Oraqix administration) and every 10 minutes up to 240 minutes post dose. (NCT01591616)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and every 10 minute to 240 minutes post-dose.

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), - 20 Minutes Pre-dose74
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), - 10 Minutes Pre-dose72
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 0 Minutes Pre-dose72
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 10 Minutes Post-dose79
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 20 Minutes Post-dose71
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 30 Minutes Post-dose72
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 40 Minutes Post-dose71
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 50 Minutes Post-dose70
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 60 Minutes Post-dose71
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 70 Minutes Post-dose74
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 80 Minutes Post-dose72
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 90 Minutes Post-dose71
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 100 Minutes Post-dose70
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 110 Minutes Post-dose72
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 120 Minutes Post-dose70
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 130 Minutes Post-dose71
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 140 Minutes Post-dose72
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 150 Minutes Post-dose72
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 160 Minutes Post-dose74
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 170 Minutes Post-dose74
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 180 Minutes Post-dose73
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 190 Minutes Post-dose72
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 200 Minutes Post-dose75
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 210 Minutes Post-dose72
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 220 Minutes Post-dose70
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 230 Minutes Post-dose72
Vital Signs (Pulse Rate), 240 Minutes Post-dose77

[back to top]

Vital Signs (Diastolic Pressure)

(NCT01591616)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (-20, -10 and 0 min prior to Oraqix administration) and every 10 minutes up to 240 minutes post dose

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Vital Signs (Diastolic), - 20 Minutes Pre-dose63
Vital Signs (Diastolic), - 10 Minutes Pre-dose60
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 0 Minutes Pre-dose63
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 10 Minutes Post-dose69
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 20 Minutes Post-dose63
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 30 Minutes Post-dose64
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 40 Minutes Post-dose62
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 50 Minutes Post-dose62
Vital Signs Diastolic(), 60 Minutes Post-dose62
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 70 Minutes Post-dose62
Vital Signs (Diastolic) 80 Minutes Post-dose62
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 90 Minutes Post-dose64
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 100 Minutes Post-dose63
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 110 Minutes Post-dose63
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 120 Minutes Post-dose60
Vital Signs Diastolic(), 130 Minutes Post-dose62
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 140 Minutes Post-dose62
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 150 Minutes Post-dose63
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 160 Minutes Post-dose63
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 170 Minutes Post-dose60
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 180 Minutes Post-dose60
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 190 Minutes Post-dose61
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 200 Minutes Post-dose60
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 210 Minutes Post-dose59
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 220 Minutes Post-dose57
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 230 Minutes Post-dose57
Vital Signs (Diastolic), 240 Minutes Post-dose60

[back to top]

Safety

"The % MetHb levels and vital signs (pulse, systolic and diastolic pressure) were measured at pre-dose (-20, -10 and 0 min prior to Oraqix administration) and every 10 minutes up to 240 minutes post dose.~ECG taken at pre-dose and 1, 2 and 4h post dose, measurement of heart rate and PR, QRS, QT and QTcB intervals.~Visual analogue scale conducted at pre-dose (immediately before Oraqix administration), immed. post extraction, at 0.25, 0.5, 1 and 2h post dose and prior to discharge just after 4h post dose.~For each subject, phone call was made at +24h as follow up pursuant to the protocol." (NCT01591616)
Timeframe: blood draws pre-dose, 2 and 4 hours postdose

InterventionPercentage MetHb (Mean)
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point -20 Minutes1.3
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point -10 Minutes1.3
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 0 Minutes1.2
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 10 Minutes1.2
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 20 Minutes1.3
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 30 Minutes1.5
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 40 Minutes1.5
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 50 Minutes1.6
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 60 Minutes1.7
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 70 Minutes1.7
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 80 Minutes1.5
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 90 Minutes1.5
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 100 Minutes1.5
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 110 Minutes1.6
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 120 Minutes1.5
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 130 Minutes1.5
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 140 Minutes1.4
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 150 Minutes1.4
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 160 Minutes1.3
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 170 Minutes1.2
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 180 Minutes1.4
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 190 Minutes1.4
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 200 Minutes1.5
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 210 Minutes1.4
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 220 Minutes1.4
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 230 Minutes1.5
% MetHemoglobin (MetHb) Time Point 240 Minutes1.4

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics

The study focused on the pharmacokinetics of prilocaine and lidocaine, o-toluidine (metabolite of prilocaine) and 2, 6-xylidine (metabolite of lidocaine). We evaluated blood samples of15 subjects at the following time points: pre-dose, at 5,10,15,30, 60, 90, 120 and 240 min post dose. We calculated Cmax (maximum observed plasma concentration) and Tmax (time to maximum plasma concentration). (NCT01591616)
Timeframe: 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 240 minutes

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Lidocaine Cmax89.9
Prilocaine Cmax41.8
2,6-xylidine Cmax3.72
O-toluidine Cmax5.13

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics

The study focused on the pharmacokinetics of prilocaine and lidocaine, o-toluidine (metabolite of prilocaine) and 2, 6-xylidine (metabolite of lidocaine). We evaluated blood samples of15 subjects at the following time points: pre-dose, at 5,10,15,30, 60, 90, 120 and 240 min post dose. We calculated Cmax (maximum observed plasma concentration) and Tmax (time to maximum plasma concentration). (NCT01591616)
Timeframe: 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 240 minutes

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Lidocaine Tmax0.500
Prilocaine Tmax0.500
2,6-xylidine Tmax1.50
O-toluidine Tmax1.50

[back to top]

ECGs (Ventricular Heart Rate)

Ventricular heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, and QTcB intervals were calculated. (NCT01591616)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1 hour, 2 hour, 4 hour post-dose.

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Ventricular Heart Rate, Pre-dose73
Ventricular Heart Rate, 1 Hour Post-dose70
Ventricular Heart Rate, 2 Hour Post-dose71
Ventricular Heart Rate, 4 Hour Post-dose74

[back to top]

Anti-emetic / Intraoperative Fentanyl Administered (Measured in Micrograms)

The secondary outcomes that will be measured in this study include the amount of anti-emetic medication used in the first 24 hours post-op. This data will be attained by reviewing the medical record and through the validated survey questions. (NCT01602692)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours following surgery

Interventionmicrograms (Mean)
Tumescent Solution With Dilute Epinephrine131.30
Tumescent Solution With Dilute Lidocaine and Epinephrine120.00

[back to top]

Amount of Post-Operative Narcotic Medication Administered

Aim 1 is to determine the effect of dilute lidocaine in tumescent solution on post-operative pain following breast reduction surgery. The amount of narcotic medication administered (in Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU), phase 2 and up to 24 hours post-op) determined by reviewing the medical record. (NCT01602692)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours following surgery

,
Interventionmg (Mean)
PACU IV hydromorphoneFirst 24 hr Post-op oxycodone
Tumescent Solution With Dilute Epinephrine0.8932.19
Tumescent Solution With Dilute Lidocaine and Epinephrine0.5529.47

[back to top]

Anti-emetic / Intraoperative Medication Administered (mg)

The secondary outcomes that will be measured in this study include the amount of anti-emetic medication used in the first 24 hours post-op. This data will be attained by reviewing the medical record and through the validated survey questions. (NCT01602692)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours following surgery

,
Interventionmg (Mean)
Mean Intraoperative hydromorphoneMean Intraoperative midazolamMean Intraoperative ketorolacMean Intraoperative dexamethasoneMean Intraoperative ondansetron
Tumescent Solution With Dilute Epinephrine0.982.0011.256.403.60
Tumescent Solution With Dilute Lidocaine and Epinephrine1.061.9016.506.004.05

[back to top]

Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting

The secondary outcomes that will be measured in this study include number of episodes of post-operative nausea (subjective feeling vs. emesis). This data will be attained by reviewing the medical record and through the validated survey questions. (NCT01602692)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours following surgery

,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
NauseaVomiting
Tumescent Solution With Dilute Epinephrine82
Tumescent Solution With Dilute Lidocaine and Epinephrine104

[back to top]

Post-operative Pain

Aim 1 is to determine the effect of dilute lidocaine in tumescent solution on post-operative pain following breast reduction surgery. The data points that will be statistically compared will be pain scores determined via a validated pain survey (pain levels on a scale of 0-10 where 10 is the worst pain) and the amount of narcotic medication administered (in Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU), phase 2 and up to 24 hours post-op) determined from responses to survey questions and by reviewing the medical record. (NCT01602692)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours following surgery

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
End of PACU Mean Pain LevelFirst 24 hrs Post-op Mean Current PainFirst 24 hrs Post-op Mean Worst PainFirst 24 hrs Post-op Mean Least Pain
Tumescent Solution With Dilute Epinephrine5.474.006.442.00
Tumescent Solution With Dilute Lidocaine and Epinephrine4.474.286.682.53

[back to top]

Time to Discharge

The patient's medical record will be reviewed to determine the time it took for the patient to be transitioned from the PACU (post anesthesia care unit) till discharge. This includes the time spent in the PACU, time spent in phase 2 and the total time to discharge. (NCT01602692)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours following surgery

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Tumescent Solution With Dilute Epinephrine158
Tumescent Solution With Dilute Lidocaine and Epinephrine153

[back to top]

Unplanned Hospital Readmission

The patient's medical record will be reviewed to see if the patient was readmitted to the hospital (unplanned) due to complications related to this surgery. (NCT01602692)
Timeframe: Up to 1 week following surgery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tumescent Solution With Dilute Epinephrine0
Tumescent Solution With Dilute Lidocaine and Epinephrine0

[back to top]

Pain During the Pelvic Floor Examination

"Subjects will be asked to report their pain level using the Wong Baker pain scale at the beginning of the exam, after a cotton tipped swab test, after the urodynamic catheters are placed in the urethra, and then 30 minutes after the completion of the exam.~The Wong Baker pain scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible)." (NCT01612156)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after completion of exam

,
Interventionunits on Wong Baker pain scale (Mean)
Pain at baselinePain after cotton tipped swab testPain after placement of urodynamic cathetersPain 30 minutes after study completion
2% Lidocaine Gel0.41.31.40.7
Water Based Lubricant0.93.63.91.2

[back to top]

Embarrassment With Pelvic Floor Examination

The participants will be asked to report their level of embarrasment during the exam using a Likert scale from 1 (no embarrassment) to 5 (most embarrasment possible) at 30 minutes after completion of the exam. (NCT01612156)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

InterventionOn 5 point Likert scale (Median)
2% Lidocaine Gel2
Water Based Lubricant2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Chronic Persistent Pain 3 Months After Surgery as Determined by Character Severity (Yes/no).

The participants development of chronic persistent pain 3 months after surgery as determined by character severity (yes/no). (NCT01619852)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Group L2
.9% Normal Saline Placebo6

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption

The amount of opioid analgesics consumed was converted to an equivalent dose of intravenous morphine. (NCT01619852)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionequivalent dose of intravenous morphine (Median)
Group L34
.9% Normal Saline Placebo39

[back to top]

Postoperative Pain

Postoperative pain within the first 24 hours. Area under the numeric rating scale for pain versus time curve during the first 24 hours after surgery (score * hr). Numeric rating scale for pain on a scale of 0-10 (0 is no pain and 10 is high pain) versus time curve during the first 24 hours ( score * hr). The pain scores were collected upon arrival to recovery area, 30 minutes, 1 hour and every 6 hours up to 24 hours following the procedure. Minimum score is 60, Maximum score is 170. A higher value indicates more pain. (NCT01619852)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Group L116
.9% Normal Saline Placebo119

[back to top]

Quality of Recovery

Quality of recovery (QoR-40 instrument) is a 40-item questionnaire that provides a global score and sub-scores across five dimensions: patient support, comfort, emotions, physical independence, and pain. Score range: 40 to 200. A score of 40 demonstrates poor recovery and a maximum score of 200 represents good recovery. The higher the score the better recovery after surgery. (NCT01619852)
Timeframe: 24 hours post operative

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Lidocaine (Group L)158
.9% Normal Saline Placebo169

[back to top]

Post-surgical Persistent Pain Using Validated Questionnaires (S-LANNS Questionnaire, McGill Questionnaire, Brief Pain Inventory) to Assess Pain Qualities in Accordance With IMMPACT Recommendations.

The development of chronic pain 3 months after surgery determined by the Leads Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) scale, a valid 7-item tool for identifying patients whose pain is dominated by neuropathic mechanisms. Each item is a binary response (yes or no) to the presence of symptoms (5 items) or clinical signs (2 items), range 0-24 points. A score ≥ 12, neuropathic mechanisms are likely to be contributing to the patient's pain. A score < 12 is unlikely to be contributing. McGill questionnaire (Sensory domain) - 11 descriptors rated on an intensity scale as 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. The higher the score, greater the pain (range 0-33). McGill questionnaire (Motivational-affective) 4 affect descriptors rated on an intensity scale as 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe.The higher the score the greater the pain (range 0-12) Brief pain inventory - pain severity (0, no pain, 10 excruciating pain); Greater the score; greater the pain (range 0-10). (NCT01619852)
Timeframe: 3 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
S-LANNSMcGill Questionaire-Sensory DiscrimationMcGill Questionaire-Motivational-affectiveBrief Pain Inventory
.9% Normal Saline Placebo3301
Group L3401

[back to top]

Participant Pain Experience After Administration of Local Anesthesia to Numb the Gums and Teeth During Dental Treatment

"Two treatment visits were required for bilateral, mandibular dental operative restorations. At each visit, local anesthetic was delivered to the right or left side of the dentition using one of the two anesthetic types. The administering operator stepped out of the room after each injection was completed, and the participant was asked by a trained research assistant to record a visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. The VAS was used to assess pain sensitivity, and utilizes a 100mm horizontal line, with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (pain as bad as it can be)." (NCT01622296)
Timeframe: immediately after anesthetic injection

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pain on inferior alveolar nerve blockPain on long buccal nerve block
Buffered Lidocaine33.19.8
Lidocaine437.3

[back to top]

Change in Heart Rate

Heart rate was measured at 5 points in time (pre-procedure, application of J-Tip, at LP needle insertion, while the needle is in place, and post-procedure) and was compared for significant differences (NCT01628874)
Timeframe: At 5 specific points during the procedure

,
InterventionBeats per Minute (Mean)
Pre-procedureJ-Tip applicationNeedle insertionNeedle in placePost-procedure
EMLA Cream, Then Placebo Via J-Tip154160170172157
Placebo Cream, Then Lidocaine Via J-Tip156167169178159

[back to top]

Pain Score

The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain. (NCT01628874)
Timeframe: At time J-TIP is used

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
EMLA Cream, Then Placebo Via J-Tip5
Placebo Cream, Then Lidocaine Via J-Tip5

[back to top]

Pain Score

The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain. (NCT01628874)
Timeframe: At Needle Insertion

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
EMLA Cream, Then Placebo Via J-Tip5
Placebo Cream, Then Lidocaine Via J-Tip5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Lumbar Puncture Success

The success of lumbar puncture was defined as obtaining Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on the first attempt and <1000 Red Blood Cells/millimeter cubed (NCT01628874)
Timeframe: Immediately following lumbar puncture

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
EMLA Cream, Then Placebo Via J-Tip8
Placebo Cream, Then Lidocaine Via J-Tip16

[back to top]

Pain Score

The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain. (NCT01628874)
Timeframe: Immediately Post-Procedure

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
EMLA Cream, Then Placebo Via J-Tip0
Placebo Cream, Then Lidocaine Via J-Tip0

[back to top]

Number of Participatns With Level 10 Pain on Wong-Baker Pain Scale In Subconjunctival Eye At Time of Intravitreal Injection

Pain was rated on a 10 point standardized pain scale, zero was the least pain and 10 was the worst pain. The patient was questioned using a script and shown a pain scale as well as told how the pain scale worked. Then the patient gave the number that characterized their pain. (NCT01640171)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Topical Anesthesia 1 Eye, SC 1 Eye0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Preferred Subconjunctival Anesthetic at the Third Follow-up Visit

Participants received anesthetic over several treatment visits. They were allowed to change there preference at each visit. The final outcome was the preference indicated at the third follow-up visit. (NCT01640171)
Timeframe: up to 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Topical Anesthesia 1 Eye, SC 1 Eye50

[back to top]

Likert Like Pain Scale Number of Participants Who Said the Topical Eye Hurt Much More Than the Subconjunctival Eye at Time of Intravitreal Injection

The patient was asked to compare the two eyes in the way described in the study protocol on a five point scale. If one eye hurt a lot more or a little more than the other or if the two eyes were equal (neither hurt more than the other). (NCT01640171)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Topical Anesthesia 1 Eye, SC 1 Eye19

[back to top]

Index Knee Pain Scores on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

Subject rated index knee pain 5 minutes after stopped experimental exercise (with intervention). Index knee pain was reported using the Numeric Rating Scale, a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain possible. (NCT01654302)
Timeframe: 5 minutes after stopped exercise, performed 1 hour after intervention (patch application)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Synera4.167
Inactive Patch4.703

[back to top]

Global Assessment of Satisfaction With Venipuncture

Rates of Satisfied and very satisfied are used to be compared between two groups. (NCT01744197)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after the venipuncture.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Synera74.0
Placebo53.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With No Pain (VAS=0)

The primary efficacy endpoint is the subject's report of pain intensity regarding the venipuncture using a 0-10 VAS. The VAS =0 is considered as patients with no pain and would also be compared between 2 groups. (NCT01744197)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after the venipuncture.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Synera19.4
Placebo8.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With No or Minor Pain (VAS<3)

The primary efficacy endpoint is the subject's report of pain intensity regarding the venipuncture using a 0-10 VAS. The VAS <3 is considered as patients with no or minor pain and would be compared between 2 groups. (NCT01744197)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after the venipuncture.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Synera38.0
Placebo21.3

[back to top]

Pain Score Following Peripheral Catheter Insertion

The primary outcome measured in this study will be the level of pain reported, on a scale of 0 to 10, 0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst pain ever felt, by the patient upon administration of the local anesthetic and upon insertion of the peripheral intravenous catheter. (NCT01759459)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 1

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Average pain score following medication injectionAverage pain score following IV inserti
Bacteriostatic Normal Saline2.103.05
Buffered Lidocaine1.61.81
Lidocaine2.581.81

[back to top]

Pain Score Following Anesthetic Administration

The primary outcome measured in this study will be the level of pain reported, on a scale of 0 to 10, 0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst pain ever felt, by the patient upon administration of the local anesthetic and upon insertion of the peripheral intravenous catheter. (NCT01759459)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine2.81
Buffered Lidocaine1.64
Bacteriostatic Normal Saline2.05

[back to top]

Economic Analysis of Cost of Compounding Buffered Lidocaine Versus Cost of Purchasing Regular Lidocaine and/or Bacteriostatic Normal Saline

A secondary outcome includes a pharmacoeconomic analysis that will look specifically at the cost-savings of using one agent over the other and will take into account the daily time allocated to pharmacy technicians and pharmacists for compounding and verifying buffered lidocaine. The outcome data was measured and reported in a single value dollar amount per group, tallied over a 3 month period. The dollar amounts were estimated by adding up the costs of drug purchasing, technician compounding time, and pharmacist verifying time. Buffered lidocaine required both drug purchasing and compounding time, where the lidocaine and bacteriostatic normal saline required drug purchasing alone and labor costs were not taken into account. (NCT01759459)
Timeframe: 3 months

InterventionDollars (Number)
Buffered Lidocaine Cost13400
Lidocaine Cost9100
Bacteriostatic Normal Saline Cost4840

[back to top]

Pain Score on the Face, Legs, Arms, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale

Pain of urethral catheterization will be determined in the lidocaine and no lidocaine groups. Score range for the FLACC scale was between 0-10 where higher score is more pain. (NCT01780324)
Timeframe: At time of procedure (up to 30 seconds after catheter insertion)

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
No Lidocaine9
Lidocaine8

[back to top]

Evaluation of Acne Scarring Using the Scale for Acne Scar Severity (SCAR-S)

Percentage of subjects improved at 36 weeks after first treatment session assessed using SCAR-S. Scale range is Very severe, Severe, Moderate, Mild, Almost clear and Clear. The alternative Clear is considered the best outcome. Improvement is considered to be at least one step improvement on the scale toward the alternative Clear. (NCT01807455)
Timeframe: 36 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Restylane Vital Lidocaine66.7

[back to top]

Adverse Event Reporting During the Study

Number of subjects reporting at least one adverse event (assessed as unrelated or related to treatment) (NCT01807455)
Timeframe: 36 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Restylane Vital Lidocaine8

[back to top]

Assessment of Local Tolerability After Treatment

Number of subjects reporting anticipated injection-related reactions after treatment (NCT01807455)
Timeframe: 14 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Restylane Vital Lidocaine12

[back to top]

Evaluation of Acne Scarring and the Surrounding Skin Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale

Percentage of improved subjects at 36 weeks after first treatment session assessed using Subject GAIS. Scale range is Worse, No Change, Somewhat Improved, Much Improved and Very Much Improved. Alternatives Somewhat Improved to Very Much Improved are considered an improvement, i.e. a better outcome. (NCT01807455)
Timeframe: 36 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Restylane Vital Lidocaine100

[back to top]

Evaluation of Skin Quality and Overall Satisfaction Using a Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire

Percentage of subjects satisfied with the overall appearance of the face at 36 weeks after first treatment session. Scale range is Very dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Somewhat satisfied and Very satisfied. Alternatives Somewhat satisfied to Very satified are considered a better outcome. (NCT01807455)
Timeframe: 36 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Restylane Vital Lidocaine83.3

[back to top]

Peak Pain Score During First 30 Minutes

"This secondary outcome will include the peak pain score for duration of follow up period. Pain will be assessed by masked observers, using the CHEOPS scale. The CHEOPS (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale) is a behavioral scale for evaluating postoperative pain in young children. The scale is assessed using the sum of a score for cry (1-3), facial expression (0-2), verbalization (0-2), torso (1-2), touch (1-2) and legs (1-2). The minimum score is 4, the maximum score is 13, and higher scores indicate more pain.~Pain is rated every 5 minutes for the first 30 minutes postoperatively." (NCT01812044)
Timeframe: 0-30 minutes post-operative

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Subtenons Anesthetic and Topical Control7.0
Topical Anesthetic and Subtenons Control7.8
Topical Control and Subtenons Control8.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting

(NCT01812044)
Timeframe: 0-150 minutes post-operative

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Subtenons Anesthetic and Topical Control1
Topical Anesthetic and Subtenons Control1
Topical Control and Subtenons Control1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Required Anti-emetic Medication Post-operatively

(NCT01812044)
Timeframe: Total time in post-operative recovery - up to 6 hours

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Subtenons Anesthetic and Topical Control1
Topical Anesthetic and Subtenons Control1
Topical Control and Subtenons Control1

[back to top]

Negative Postoperative Behavior Score on the PHBQ (Post Hospitalization Behavioral Questionnaire)

"This secondary outcome will determine the negative postoperative behaviors based on the PHBQ questionnaire given to the parents of the child 1 week (+/- 3 days) post-operatively.~with a score of 81 indicating no change, a score of less than 81 indicating a change for the better, and a score of over 81 indicating a change for the worse, on average, in behavior.~Lowest score 27; highest score 135" (NCT01812044)
Timeframe: 1 week (+/- 3 days) post operatively

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Subtenons Anesthetic and Topical Control80.2
Topical Anesthetic and Subtenons Control78.2
Topical Control and Subtenons Control78.5

[back to top]

Peak Pain Score

"This secondary outcome will include the peak pain score for duration of follow up period. Pain will be assessed by masked observers, using the CHEOPS scale. The CHEOPS (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale) is a behavioral scale for evaluating postoperative pain in young children. The scale is assessed using the sum of a score for cry (1-3), facial expression (0-2), verbalization (0-2), torso (1-2), touch (1-2) and legs (1-2). The minimum score is 4, the maximum score is 13, and higher scores indicate more pain.~A pain score was assessed and recorded every 5 minutes by a masked observer (clinical research coordinator) for the first 30 minutes after extubation, then every 15 minutes for the next hour, then, if applicable, hourly until discharge." (NCT01812044)
Timeframe: 0-150 minutes post-operative

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Subtenons Anesthetic and Topical Control8.65
Topical Anesthetic and Subtenons Control10.47
Topical Control and Subtenons Control9.69

[back to top]

Average Time to Discharge

(NCT01812044)
Timeframe: 0-150 minutes post-operative

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Subtenons Anesthetic and Topical Control106
Topical Anesthetic and Subtenons Control107
Topical Control and Subtenons Control106

[back to top]

Average Pain Score Over the First 30 Post-operative Minutes Using the CHEOPS Scale

"Pain will be assessed by a masked observer using the Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) scale. The CHEOPS (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale) is a behavioral scale for evaluating postoperative pain in young children. The scale is assessed using the sum of a score for cry (1-3), facial expression (0-2), verbalization (0-2), torso (1-2), touch (1-2) and legs (1-2). The minimum score is 4, the maximum score is 13, and higher scores indicate more pain.~Pain is rated every 5 minutes for the first 30 minutes postoperatively. Each pain score collected in the first 30 minutes was averaged to calculate a per per participant average pain score over the first 30 minutes . Then each participant's per participant average pain score was combined to calculate the reported mean for Average pain score over the first 30 post-operative minutes using the CHEOPS scale. for each group." (NCT01812044)
Timeframe: 0-30 minutes post-operative

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Subtenons Anesthetic and Topical Control6.36
Topical Anesthetic and Subtenons Control6.57
Topical Control and Subtenons Control6.58

[back to top]

Total Narcotic Use During Post-operative Recovery

This secondary outcome will include total narcotic use (NCT01812044)
Timeframe: Total time in post-operative recovery - up to 6 hours

Interventionmcg/kg (Mean)
Subtenons Anesthetic and Topical Control1.65
Topical Anesthetic and Subtenons Control1.78
Topical Control and Subtenons Control1.60

[back to top]

Subject Perception of Anxiety With Patient Positioning Procedure

Subjects will be asked to rate anxiety prior to starting pelvic exam by marking along a mm Visual Analog Scale, with 0mm being No Anxiety and 100mm being Worst Imaginable Anxiety (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: prior to starting pelvic exam (30-60 minutes after premedication)

Interventionmm (Mean)
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen56.6
Midazolam and Ibuprofen45.4

[back to top]

Subject Perception of Pain During Cervical Dilation

Subjects will be asked to rate pain at the time of cervical dilation by marking along a mm Visual Analog Scale, with 0mm being No Pain and 100mm being Worst Imaginable Pain (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: with cervical dilation (30-60 minutes after premedication)

Interventionmm (Mean)
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen73.0
Midazolam and Ibuprofen69.3

[back to top]

Subject Vital Signs (Heart Rate)

Subject heart rate will be assessed for the duration of the procedure (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: intraoperatively (30-60 minutes after premedication)

Interventionbmp (Mean)
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen80
Midazolam and Ibuprofen78.5

[back to top]

Subject Vital Signs (Heart Rate) 30 Minutes Postprocedure

Subject vital signs (heart rate) will be assessed 30 minutes postoperatively (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: 30 minutes postoperatively

Interventionbpm (Mean)
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen70.1
Midazolam and Ibuprofen72

[back to top]

Subject Vital Signs (Oxygenation Saturation)

Subject oxygenation status will be assessed for the duration of the procedure (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: intraoperatively (30-60 minutes after premedication)

Interventionpercent saturation (Mean)
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen98.3
Midazolam and Ibuprofen98.1

[back to top]

Subject Vital Signs (Oxygenation Saturation) 30 Minutes Postprocedure

Subject vital signs (oxygenation saturation) will be assessed 30 minutes postoperatively (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: 30 minutes postoperatively

Interventionpercent saturation (Mean)
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen98.3
Midazolam and Ibuprofen98.1

[back to top]

Subject's Correct Identification of Receiving Midazolam or Placebo

Number of patient's who could correctly determine if they received study drug or placebo when asked (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: 30 minutes postoperatively

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen43
Midazolam and Ibuprofen48

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Need for Additional Postoperative Pain Medication

Subjects will be assessed 30 minutes postoperatively for need of additional pain medications. (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: 30 minutes postoperatively

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
OndansetronHydrocodone/acetaminophen
Midazolam and Ibuprofen32
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen21

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction With Pain and Anxiety 30 Minutes Postoperatively

To assess whether oral midazolam is associated with differences in overall patient satisfaction with pain and anxiety control and abortion experience at 30 min postoperatively as measured by a mm Visual Analog Scale with 0mm being Not At All Satisfied and 100mm being Very Satisfied (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: 30 minutes post-operatively

,
Interventionmm on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (Mean)
Satisfaction with anxiety control (100-mm VAS)Satisfaction with pain control (100-mm VAS)
Midazolam and Ibuprofen68.950.0
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen56.143.2

[back to top]

Subject Satisfaction With Pain and Anxiety 1-3 Days Post Procedure

To assess whether oral midazolam is associated with differences in overall patient satisfaction with pain and anxiety control and abortion experience at 1-3 days postoperatively as measured by a mm VAS with 0mm being Not At All Satisfied and 100mm being Very Satisfied (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: 1-3 days post-operatively

,
Interventionmm on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (Mean)
Satisfaction with anxiety control (100-mm VAS)Satisfaction with pain control (100-mm VAS)
Midazolam and Ibuprofen64.748.2
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen50.236.6

[back to top]

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Anxiety at Baseline

"To measure the mean State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Form Y-1 for anxiety. State anxiety items include: I am tense; I am worried and I feel calm; I feel secure. Trait anxiety items include: I worry too much over something that really doesn't matter and I am content; I am a steady person. Each type of anxiety has its own 4-point scale of 20 different questions that are scored. The 4-point scale for S-anxiety is as follows: 1.) not at all, 2.) somewhat, 3.) moderately so, 4.) very much so. The 4-point scale for T-anxiety is as follows: 1.) almost never, 2.) sometimes, 3.) often, 4.) almost always. Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicate greater anxiety. State anxiety items and Trait anxiety items were each summed in assessment to provide two total scores for each participant, a State anxiety score and a Trait anxiety score. Mean and standard deviation of total scores for each group are reported." (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: Baseline (upon entry into study)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
State anxiety levelTrait anxiety level
Midazolam and Ibuprofen51.338.6
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen50.840.1

[back to top]

Subject Anticipated Perception of Pain and Anxiety During Uterine Aspiration at Baseline

Subjects will be asked to rate their anticipated anxiety and pain at the time of uterine aspiration by marking along a mm Visual Analog Scale, with 0mm being No Pain/Anxiety and 100mm being Worst Imaginable Pain/Anxiety (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: Baseline (upon entry into study)

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
Expected AnxietyExpected Pain
Midazolam and Ibuprofen74.269.2
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen77.567.2

[back to top]

Subject Extent of Amnesia Using Amnesia Score

To assess the extent of amnesia 30 min postoperatively as measured by ability to recall procedure using 4-point scale (0 = unable to recall any proportion of the procedure, 1 = able to recall and describe some portions of the procedure, but overall has minimal recall of the procedure, 2 = able to recall and describe most of the procedure, but admits to inability to recall some portion of the procedure, 3 = able to recall and describe the entire procedure). (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: 30 minutes postoperatively

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Partial to complete amnesia (score 0,1,2)No Amnesia (score 3)
Midazolam and Ibuprofen3130
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen1645

[back to top]

Subject Extent of Sedation

Subject extent of sedation 30-60 minutes after premedication, just prior to procedure as measured by the 6-point Ramsay Scale (1 = patient anxious agitated, or restless; 2 = patient cooperative, oriented, and tranquil; 3 = patient asleep, responds to commands only; 4 = patient asleep, responds to gentle shaking, light glabellar tap, or loud auditory stimulus; 5 = patient asleep, responds to noxious stimuli such as firm nail bed pressure; 6 = patient asleep, has no response to firm nail bed pressure or other noxious stimuli) (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: 30-60 minutes after premedication

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1234 or greater
Midazolam and Ibuprofen105110
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen115000

[back to top]

Subject Perception of Pain and Anxiety During Uterine Aspiration

Subjects will be asked to rate anxiety and pain at the time of uterine aspiration by marking along a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale, with 0mm being No Pain/Anxiety and 100mm being Worst Imaginable Pain/Anxiety (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: at time of uterine aspiration (30-60 minutes after premedication)

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
Pain with AspirationAnxiety with Aspiration
Midazolam and Ibuprofen70.160.9
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen74.368.2

[back to top]

Subject Perception of Pain and Anxiety Post Procedure

Subjects will be asked to rate anxiety and pain 30 minutes post-operatively by marking along a mm Visual Analog Scale, with 0mm being No Pain/Anxiety and 100mm being Worst Imaginable Pain/Anxiety (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: 30 minutes post operatively

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
Anxiety Post ProcedurePain Post Procedure
Midazolam and Ibuprofen14.437.1
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen20.934.7

[back to top]

Subject Perception of Pain and Anxiety Upon Entering Procedure Room

Subjects will be asked to rate anxiety and pain upon entering procedure room by marking along a mm Visual Analog Scale, with 0mm being No Pain/Anxiety and 100mm being Worst Imaginable Pain/Anxiety (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: upon entering procedure room (30-60 minutes after premedication)

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
Anxiety at Room EntryPain at Room Entry
Midazolam and Ibuprofen34.510.1
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen51.417.5

[back to top]

Subject Sleepiness 30 Minutes Postprocedure

Subject sleepiness will be assessed 30 minutes postoperatively using a 100mm Visual Analog Scale with 0mm being None and 100mm being Worst Imaginable (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: 30 minutes postoperatively

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen40.1
Midazolam and Ibuprofen56.6

[back to top]

Subject Extent of Amnesia

To assess the extent of amnesia 1-3 days postoperatively as measured by 100mm Visual Analog Scale with 0mm being Remember Nothing and 100mm being Remember Everything. (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: 1-3 days postoperatively

Interventionmm (Mean)
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen91.5
Midazolam and Ibuprofen61.3

[back to top]

Subject Nausea 30 Minutes Postprocedure

Subject nausea will be assessed 30 minutes postoperatively using a 100mm Visual Analog Scale with 0mm being None and 100mm being Worst Imaginable (NCT01830881)
Timeframe: 30 minutes postoperatively

Intervention100-mm visual analog sclae for nausea (Mean)
Placebo-cherry Syrup and Ibuprofen9.5
Midazolam and Ibuprofen3.5

[back to top]

Percent of Patients With Successful Anesthesia (% of Patients Able to Have Treatment Without Additional Anesthesia)

(NCT01868776)
Timeframe: pain at time of treatment (after buffered versus nonbuffered numbing solution) average of 15 minutes after injection

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Buffered Lidocaine16
Nonbuffered Lidocaine20

[back to top]

Effect of Buffered Lidocaine on the Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis.

100 patients diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of a mandibular posterior tooth randomly received a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IAN) block using either 2.8 ml of 4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 2.8 ml of 4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine buffered with sodium bicarbonate in a double-blind manner. For the buffered solution, each cartridge was buffered with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate to produce a final concentration of 0.18 mEq/mL of sodium bicarbonate. Fifteen minutes after administration of the IAN block, profound lip numbness was confirmed and endodontic access was initiated. Success was determined as no or mild pain on access or instrumentation of the root canal. Higher numbers on the VAS are indicative of more pain and less success and the VAS scale ranged from 0 to 170 mm. (NCT01868776)
Timeframe: approximately 15 minutes after injection

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Buffered Lidocaine32
Nonbuffered Lidocaine40

[back to top]

Pain at J-tip Deployment

Pain when J-tip deployed assessed by video reviewers using pain scale. The FLACC (Face, legs, activity, cry and consolability) Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), was used to assess pain. (NCT01890642)
Timeframe: 1 minute

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
J Tip Noise3.25
Pain Ease2.5
J Tip4.0

[back to top]

Pain Score

Pain score as assessed by video reviewers. The FLACC (Face, legs, activity, cry and consolability) Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), was used to assess pain. (NCT01890642)
Timeframe: At venipuncture (3 minutes)

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
J Tip Noise5.75
Pain Ease8
J Tip5.25

[back to top]

Fist Attempt Success

Proportion of patients where blood draw was successful on first attempt (NCT01890642)
Timeframe: up to 3 minutes

Interventionparticipants (Number)
J Tip Noise52
Pain Ease48
J Tip86

[back to top]

Change in Pain Score on FLACC Scale From Device Deployment to Venipuncture

"Pain score assessed by video reviewer at J-tip, J-tip noise or researcher approach (1 minute) and at venipuncture (3 minutes). The score at J-tip noise/researcher approach was subtracted from the score at venipuncture to give a number indicating the change in pain scores.~The FLACC (Face, legs, activity, cry and consolability) Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), was used to assess pain." (NCT01890642)
Timeframe: 3 min

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
J Tip Noise1.71
Pain Ease2.82
J Tip0.23

[back to top]

Change in Pain Score From Baseline

"Pain score assessed by video reviewer before intervention (0 minute) and at venipuncture (3 minutes). The score at baseline was subtracted from the score at venipuncture to give a number indicating the change in pain scores.~The FLACC (Face, legs, activity, cry and consolability) Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), was used to assess pain." (NCT01890642)
Timeframe: 3 min

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
J Tip Noise2.32
Pain Ease3.7
J Tip1.58

[back to top]

Cue-induced Craving After Lidocaine/Saline Administration.

7 days after lidocaine/saline administration, cocaine craving will be measured during the administration of relaxation or craving script. Craving intensity will be measured by the subjective intensity of craving as reported by the participant. Measured via a visual analog scale based on 4 (out of 10) questions from the Cocaine Craving Questionnaire (1-strongly disagree to 7- strongly agree). Highest total score possible 28, lowest score possible is 4. If the score is low in the lidocaine group and high in the saline group, it would mean that lidocaine has successfully decreased the craving response relative to saline. (NCT01929343)
Timeframe: craving measured immediately following reading of the script.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine Following Cue-induced Craving31.7
Lidocaine Following Neutral Stimulus17.3
Saline22.7

[back to top]

Physiological Responses as Measured by EMG (Electromyography) After Lidocaine/Saline Administration.

Electromyography (frontal) will be measured during the administration of the relaxation or craving script seven days after infusion. EMG is assessed by uV (microvolts). Higher scores reflect greater amounts of EMG activity, lower scores reflect lower amounts of EMG activity. It was expected that EMG would be positively associated with cocaine craving. (NCT01929343)
Timeframe: 2 minutes during administration of script.

InterventionuV (Mean)
Lidocaine Following Cue-induced Craving21.6
Lidocaine Following Neutral Stimulus28.1
Saline5.9

[back to top]

Physiological Responses as Measured by Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) After Lidocaine/Saline Administration.

7 days after lidocaine/saline administration, GSR will be measured during the reading of the relaxation or saline script. It is predicted that higher GSR would be associated with higher cocaine craving and lower GSR will be associated with lower cocaine craving. (NCT01929343)
Timeframe: 2 minutes during script reading.

InterventionEDA Amplitute (uS) (Mean)
Lidocaine Following Cue-induced Craving19.1
Lidocaine Following Neutral Stimulus20.1
Saline20.4

[back to top]

Physiological Responses as Measured by Heart Rate After Lidocaine/Saline Administration.

7 days after lidocaine/saline administration, heart rate will be measured during the administration of a relaxation or craving script. Heart rate will be measured in beats per minute. (NCT01929343)
Timeframe: 120 seconds, during reading of the script.

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Lidocaine Following Cue-induced Craving67.4
Lidocaine Following Neutral Stimulus73.0
Saline77.5

[back to top]

Cocaine Craving

basal measures of cocaine craving will be measured by Cocaine Craving Questionnaire (CCQ) times weekly after lidocaine/saline administration. The higher the score the more craving and lower the score the less craving. The CCQ has 10 items, each item scored 1-7. Maximum score is 70, minimum score is 7. (NCT01929343)
Timeframe: cocaine craving will be measure during the 4 weeks following infusion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine Following Cue-induced Craving32.3
Lidocaine Following Neutral Stimulus15.8
Saline20.9

[back to top]

Cocaine Use

cocaine use will be measured by urine drug screen and participant self-report three times weekly after lidocaine/saline administration. Cocaine use will be assessed as positive (1) or negative (0) using urine drug screen for cocaine and/or by participant self-report of cocaine use. (NCT01929343)
Timeframe: cocaine use will be measure during the 4 weeks following infusion

Interventiondays of cocaine used/week (Mean)
Lidocaine Following Cue-induced Craving3.8
Lidocaine Following Neutral Stimulus2.7
Saline3.0

[back to top]

Postoperative Pain

Analysis of patient outcome will involve a series of visual analogue scale (VAS, 0 cm as no pain - 10 cm as maximum pain) pain evaluations during mobilization, coughing, and resting (NCT01944098)
Timeframe: 12 hours post-surgery

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Resting VASCoughing VASMoving VAS
Lidocaine3.578
Placebo477

[back to top]

Postoperative Pain

Analysis of patient outcome will involve a series of visual analogue scale (VAS, 0 cm as no pain - 10 cm as maximum pain) pain evaluations during mobilization, coughing, and resting (NCT01944098)
Timeframe: 18 hours post-surgery

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Resting VASCoughing VASMoving VAS
Lidocaine2.566
Placebo4.56.57

[back to top]

Postoperative Pain

Analysis of patient outcome will involve a series of visual analogue scale pain evaluations during mobilization, coughing, and resting. VAS, 0 cm as no pain - 10 cm as maximum pain (NCT01944098)
Timeframe: 24 hours post-surgery

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Resting VASCoughing VASMoving VAS
Lidocaine386
Placebo3.55.54.5

[back to top]

Postoperative Pain

Analysis of patient outcome will involve a series of visual analogue scale pain evaluations during mobilization, coughing, and resting. VAS, 0 cm as no pain - 10 cm as maximum pain (NCT01944098)
Timeframe: 6 hours post-surgery

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Resting VASCoughing VASMoving VAS
Lidocaine388
Placebo4.588

[back to top]

Measurement of Pain Associated With Injection, in Millimeters, According to Visual Analog Scale

The investigation is trying to determine if the compounded topical anesthetic (Pliaglis) is more effective than the active control (benzocaine) in numbing the gums before needle penetration. The effectiveness of the topical anesthetics will be determined by the patient indicating their level of discomfort felt upon needle stick by using a Heft-Parker visual analog pain scale (scale of 0 - 170mm with 0mm equating to no pain and 170mm equating to maximum pain). (NCT01951820)
Timeframe: 2.5 minutes

Interventionmm (Mean)
Benzocaine38.5
Pliaglis26.9

[back to top]

Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

"Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worse imaginable pain).~Change scores are calculated from baseline (pre-infusion) at 15 minutes after start of infusion, 30 minutes after start of infusion, and 30 minutes after infusion complete:~(15 minutes after start of infusion value - BL pre-infusion value) (30 minutes after start of infusion value - BL pre-infusion value) (30 minutes after infusion complete value - BL pre-infusion value)" (NCT01968694)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after start of infusion, 30 minutes after start of infusion, and 30 minutes after infusion complete from BL (pre-infusion)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
15 minutes after start of infusion change30 minutes after start of infusion change30 minutes after infusion complete change
IV Diphenhydramine-0.2-1.5-1.7
IV Lidocaine-2.6-3.5-3.6

[back to top]

Change in Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2

"Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire version 2 consists of 22 pain items (Throbbing, Shooting, Stabbing, Sharp, Cramping, Gnawing, Hot-burning, Aching, Heavy, Tender, Splitting, Tiring-exhausting, Sickening, Fearful, Punishing-cruel, Electric-shock, Cold-freezing, Piercing, Pain caused by light touch, Itching, Tingling or 'pins and needles', and Numbness). Each item is rated on a scale from 0-10, where 0=none, and 10=worst possible pain. The total pain score is the sum of these 22 items, ranging from 0-220.~Change scores are calculated from baseline (pre-infusion) at 30 minutes, 1 week, and 1 month post-treatment:~(30 minutes post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)~(1 week post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)~(1 month post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)" (NCT01968694)
Timeframe: 30 minutes, 1 week, and 1 month post-treatment from BL (pre-infusion)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
30 minutes change from BL1 week change from BL1 month change from BL
IV Diphenhydramine-15-17-18
IV Lidocaine-14.5-184

[back to top]

Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): Pain on Average

"The Pain on Average score in the Brief Pain Inventory is rated from 0-10, where 0 is no pain, and 10 is pain as bad as you can imagine.~Change scores are calculated from baseline (pre-infusion) at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month post-treatment:~(1 day post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)~(1 week post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)~(1 month post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)" (NCT01968694)
Timeframe: 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month post-treatment from BL (pre-infusion)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
1 day change from BL1 week change from BL1 month change from BL
IV Diphenhydramine00-1
IV Lidocaine-2-2-1

[back to top]

Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

"The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) consists of 14 items rated from 0-3 and 2 subscales Depression (7 items) and Anxiety (7 items). A higher score on each item represents more of each symptom (i.e., more depression or more anxiety). Each subscale score is the sum of the 7 items from each subscale.~A score of 0-7 = Normal, 8-10=Borderline abnormal (borderline case), and 11-21=Abnormal (case).~Change scores are calculated from baseline (pre-infusion) at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month post-treatment:~(1 day post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)~(1 week post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)~(1 month post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)" (NCT01968694)
Timeframe: 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month post-treatment from BL (pre-infusion)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Anxiety 1 day changeAnxiety 1 week changeAnxiety 1 month changeDepression 1 day changeDepression 1 week changeDepression 1 month change
IV Diphenhydramine0-2-1.00-2-0.5
IV Lidocaine-1-10-0.5-1-1

[back to top]

Pain Measurement as Assessed on a Heft-Parker 170 mm Visual Analog Scale

"Patients will rate pain on a Heft-Parker visual analog scale during needle insertion, placement, and solution deposition phases of the anesthetic injection(s). Patients will also rate pain during the incision and dissection phases of the incision and drainage procedure. The number of millimeters along the scale are reported. No pain corresponded to 0 mm. Mild pain was defined as greater than 0 mm and less than or equal to 54 mm. Mild pain included the descriptors of faint, weak, and mild pain. Moderate pain was defined as greater than 54 mm and less than 114 mm and included the descriptor moderate. Severe pain was defined as equal to or greater than 114 mm up to and including 170 mm. Severe pain included the descriptors of strong, intense, and maximum possible." (NCT01981772)
Timeframe: during incision/drainage on Day 0

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Buffered Lidocaine69.3
Nonbuffered Lidocaine59.2

[back to top]

Postoperative Satisfaction on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale

"Patients will rate their level of satisfaction with the incision and drainage procedure using a visual analog scale. The scale ranges from not satisfied, to somewhat satisfied, to moderately satisfied, to completely satisfied. Not satisfied corresponded to 0 mm. Somewhat satisfied was defined as greater than 0 mm and less than or equal to 33 mm. Moderately satisfied was defined as greater than 33 mm and less than 66 mm. Completely satisfied was defined as equal to or greater than 66 mm. Measurements along the scale were collected and analyzed by randomization test." (NCT01981772)
Timeframe: immediately post-procedure on Day 0

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Buffered Lidocaine92.7
Nonbuffered Lidocaine89.5

[back to top]

Pain Intensity

The primary outcome will be average pain intensity at rest on postoperative day 1 - 3. Pain Intensity rated from 0 (none) to 10 (severe). (NCT01983020)
Timeframe: postoperative day 1 - 3

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketamine6.29
Lidocaine5.76
Ketamine and Lidocaine5.51
Placebo6.40

[back to top]

Bispectral Index Score

The bispectral index(BIS) score of each patient was recorded at two different time points. BIS values varies from 0 to 100(0, no cerebral activity; 40 to 60, general anesthesia; 60 to 85, sedated; 85 to 100, awake). (NCT02000973)
Timeframe: Before starting anesthesia to finishing endotracheal intubation

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline20 minutes after epidural injection
Bupivacaine97.0792.43
Lidocaine96.7090.00
Normal Saline96.6796.20
Ropivacaine96.9489.12

[back to top]

Propofol Effect-site Concentration

The effect-site concentration of propofol when loss of consciousness during propofol target-controlled infusing(TCI) induction of anesthesia. (NCT02000973)
Timeframe: Before starting anesthesia to finishing endotracheal intubation

Interventionug/ml (Mean)
Normal Saline1.76
Lidocaine1.14
Bupivacaine1.09
Ropivacaine1.04

[back to top]

Mean Arterial Pressure

The mean arterial pressure of each patient was recorded at five different time points (NCT02000973)
Timeframe: Before starting anesthesia to finishing endotracheal intubation

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline20minites after epidural injectionLoss of consciousnessBefore endotracheal intubationAfter endotracheal intubation
Bupivacaine98.9595.9081.0561.6585.82
Lidocaine99.6596.2581.1562.3084.68
Normal Saline96.4099.5586.7567.1596.82
Ropivacaine98.2595.4080.9560.6086.12

[back to top]

Heart Rate

The heart rate of each patient was recorded at five different time points (NCT02000973)
Timeframe: Before starting anesthesia to finishing endotracheal intubation

,,,
Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Baseline20 minites after epidural injectionLoss of consciousnessBefore endotracheal intubationAfter endotracheal intubation
Bupivacaine69.0067.4065.9059.1075.10
Lidocaine69.6569.1570.4061.7576.70
Normal Saline71.7073.9569.9064.1588.00
Ropivacaine74.8071.5070.0061.8579.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pain Assessment Using McGill Pain Questionnaire

Participants rated 15 pain characteristics by using a number to signify how much of that specific type of pain they were experiencing using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire. The pain characteristic options included Throbbing, Shooting, Stabbing, Sharp, Cramping, Gnawing, Hot-burning, Aching, Heavy, Tender, Splitting, Tiring-exhausting, Sickening, Fearful, and Punishing- cruel. Participants assessed the intensity of each characteristic using the following score system: none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), and severe (3). In addition, present pain was assessed on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 5 (excruciating). (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Baseline (predose) and Day 84

,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
ThrobbingShootingStabbingSharpCrampingGnawingHot-BurningAchingHeavyTenderSplittingTiring-ExhaustingSickeningFearfulPunishing-CruelPresent pain
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Paradigm 1 / Placebo0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.00.00.00.0
Paradigm 2 / Placebo0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.0
Paradigm 3 / Placebo0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Paradigm 4 / Placebo0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

Bruising Grading Scale Scores

"The following grading system was used for the assessment of bruising:~Bruising absent (0)~Bruising associated with 1 to 3 needle insertion points (1)~Bruising spreading beyond 4 or more individual needle insertion points but contained within the treatment area (2)~Bruising covering the entire treatment area but contained within the treatment area (3)~Bruising of the neck and face beyond the treatment area (4)" (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 1 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 2 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 3 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 4 / Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale Scores

Participants were provided with a scale 100 mm in length and were asked to mark the place on the line that best represents his or her pain associated with the area treated with study drug. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (most severe pain possible). (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 1 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 2 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 3 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 4 / Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (PR-SMFRS)

"The PR-SMFRS is based on the participant's response to the question How much fat do you have under your chin right now? answered on a 5-point ordinal scale (0-4) with 0 = no chin fat at all, 1 = a slight amount of chin fat, 2 = a moderate amount of chin fat, 3 = a large amount of chin fat, and 4 = a very large amount of chin fat. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement." (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-1.2
Paradigm 1 / Placebo-0.7
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-0.9
Paradigm 2 / Placebo-0.5
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-0.8
Paradigm 3 / Placebo-0.8
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-0.7
Paradigm 4 / Placebo-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Subject Self Rating Scale (SSRS)

The SSRS assesses participant's satisfaction with their appearance in association with the face and chin on a 7-point scale from 0 to 6: where 0 = Extremely dissatisfied, 1 = Dissatisfied, 2 = Slightly dissatisfied, 3 = Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = Slightly satisfied, 5 = Satisfied and 6 = Extremely satisfied. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection2.8
Paradigm 1 / Placebo2.3
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection3.2
Paradigm 2 / Placebo1.8
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection2.3
Paradigm 3 / Placebo2.3
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection2.4
Paradigm 4 / Placebo2.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Submental Fat Thickness

Submental thickness was measured using caliper devices. (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

Interventionmm (Mean)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-1.4
Paradigm 1 / Placebo-2.3
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-1.6
Paradigm 2 / Placebo-0.3
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-0.9
Paradigm 3 / Placebo-2.3
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-1.5
Paradigm 4 / Placebo-2.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS)

The CR-SMFRS score is based on the investigator's clinical evaluation of the participant, where submental fullness is scored on a 5-point ordinal scale (0-4) with 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, and 4 = extreme. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-0.6
Paradigm 1 / Placebo-0.7
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-0.6
Paradigm 2 / Placebo-0.8
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-0.4
Paradigm 3 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-0.4
Paradigm 4 / Placebo-0.3

[back to top]

Induration Grading Scale Scores

"The following grading system was used for the assessment of induration:~Induration absent to minimal (0)~Induration associated with at least approximately 30% of the treatment area (1)~Induration associated with greater than approximately 30% to at least 60% of the treatment area (2)~Induration covering the entire treatment area but contained within the treatment area (3)~Induration of the neck and face beyond the treatment area (4)" (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 1 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.1
Paradigm 2 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 3 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.1
Paradigm 4 / Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Swelling Grading Scale Scores

"The following grading system was used for the assessment of swelling:~Swelling/edema absent (0)~Minimal swelling/edema contained within treatment area (1)~Modest swelling/edema contained within treatment area (2)~Substantial swelling/edema contained within treatment area (3)~Swelling/edema of the neck and face beyond the treatment area (4)" (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 1 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 2 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 3 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 4 / Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Patient Experience Questions

"Participants were asked to complete 3 patient experience questions, each answered as Yes or No:~Given your experience in this study:~Would you recommend this procedure to a friend?~Would you agree to receive additional treatments?~Has the treatment you received in this study affected your normal activities?~The percentage of participants answering Yes on each question is reported." (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Day 84

,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Recommend to a FriendReceive Additional TreatmentsNormal Activity Affected
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection818113
Paradigm 1 / Placebo33670
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection818813
Paradigm 2 / Placebo50500
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection949419
Paradigm 3 / Placebo1001000
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection727811
Paradigm 4 / Placebo7510025

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Submental Skin Laxity Grades (SMSLG)

Skin laxity assessment was based on clinical evaluation and palpation of the submental area on the following scale: 1 = no laxity; 2 = mild laxity; 3 = moderate laxity; 4 = severe laxity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.2
Paradigm 1 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.1
Paradigm 2 / Placebo0.5
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.3
Paradigm 3 / Placebo0.5
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.3
Paradigm 4 / Placebo0.3

[back to top]

Mean Change in Erythema (Redness) in the Treated Human Arm (Not Placebo) From Baseline Determined by Measures (3) Taken Over 24 Hours

"Visual inspection of sting sites will be done at 30 minutes post sting (after treatment completed), 1 hour post sting, and 24 hours post sting. Erythema Index (EI) imeasures increase in cutaneous vasodilation. A computer-measured (Image-J software) EI was used to remove subjectivity. A numeric score was created for the level of erythema, with 0 representing baseline erythema on the control arm. Any positive number indicates more and negative number less erythema on treatment arm compared to placebo. EI values were measured on a scale from -20 to +20 with 0 being the midpoint where there would be equal amounts of erythema on both the treatment and control arm. The erythema they experienced on the treatment arm was then measured as more erythema (a positive value up to 20) or less erythema (a negative value up to -20)." (NCT02015195)
Timeframe: 30 minutes, 1 hour, and 24 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Acetic Acid 5%4.43
Sodium Bicarbonate Slurry (50%)-12.07
Papain Slurry (70%)0.58
Lidocaine (4%)-4.14
Isopropyl Alcohol (70%)2.11
Hot Water (40 Degrees Celsius)-4.11

[back to top]

Mean Change in Pain in the Treated Human Arm (Not Placebo) From Baseline Determined by Measures (17) Taken Over 24 Hours

"Pain is measured on a scale of 1-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being worse pain ever felt. Baseline pain will be measured immediately after being stung for 2 minutes without any treatment. Subsequent pain felt at every 2 minutes for 30 minutes, at 1 hour post sting, and at 24 hours post sting will be based on changes from the original baseline pain. Mean change is defined as the mean change in pain from all time points measured from each participant and then averaged for each group. The control arm (placebo) was collected and analyzed in parallel to the treatment arm. The mean change for the treatment arm was then compared with the mean change for the control arm as a baseline. Hence, the data presented are the estimated effect for each treatment group compared to the control arms for each group." (NCT02015195)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Acetic Acid 5%0.13
Sodium Bicarbonate Slurry (50%)-0.19
Papain Slurry (70%)-0.46
Lidocaine (4%)-0.31
Isopropyl Alcohol (70%)-0.26
Hot Water (40 Degrees Celsius)0.42

[back to top]

Narcotic Consumption (Measured in mg/kg Narcotic Consumption)

The infusion was initiated at 1.5mg/kg for 30 minutes prior to surgery start, followed by a 2.0 mg/kg/hr infusion at the time of incision start. The rate was reduced to 1.5mg/kg/hr for the remainder of the 24 hour period. A standardized post-operative pain management strategy (morphine and oxycodone) was followed by clinical staff, based on a standardized pain scale rating tool. The difference in narcotic consumption and number of pain medication doses over the 72-hour post-operative period was compared using an unadjusted Wilcoxon rank sum test due to non-normal data distribution. (NCT02059902)
Timeframe: 24-hours post surgery

Interventionmg/kg narcotic consumption (Median)
Normal Pain Management57.5
Lidocaine67.75

[back to top]

Difference in Visual-analog Score (VAS) for Anticipated Pain Prior to Injection and Actual Pain After Injection

Members of both study groups completed the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain assessment both prior for anticipated pain and after injection for actual pain; these recorded scores were the primary study endpoint and were later compared to determine the difference in anticipated pain versus actual pain experienced. The VAS ranges from 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst possible pain. The outcome measure is the mean anticipated pain minus the actual pain experienced. (NCT02084706)
Timeframe: Our outcome measure was collected within the 60 seconds before and following the steroid injection.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Triamcinolone (20 g) and 2% Lidocaine Injection Over A1 Pulley1.6
J-tip Lidocaine Administration, Then Steroid Injection2.8

[back to top]

Number of Daily Headaches

The number of times per day that symptoms occur (NCT02090998)
Timeframe: Study Day 1 through Study Day 30

InterventionNumber of Daily Headaches (Mean)
Amitriptyline / Elavil20.5
SPG Nerve Block With Lidocaine 5% Gel13.4

[back to top]

Pain Intensity

The level of pain intensity is quantified using a standard 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale with 10 being the most severe pain intensity and 0 the absence of pain. (NCT02120261)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
TPI With Normal Saline4.29
TPI With Lidocaine & Triamcinolone Acetonide4.14

[back to top]

Pain Intensity

The level of pain intensity is quantified using a standard 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale with 10 being the most severe pain intensity and 0 the absence of pain. (NCT02120261)
Timeframe: baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
TPI With Normal Saline7.69
TPI With Lidocaine & Triamcinolone Acetonide7.44

[back to top]

Pain Intensity

The level of pain intensity is quantified using a standard 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale with 10 being the most severe pain intensity and 0 the absence of pain. (NCT02120261)
Timeframe: at discharge (a few minutes after receiving intervention)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
TPI With Normal Saline1.52
TPI With Lidocaine & Triamcinolone Acetonide1.76

[back to top]

Duration of Pain Relief

If the patient experienced pain relief with the trigger point injection and the pain came back later, the number of days after the injection at which the pain had returned was recorded. (NCT02120261)
Timeframe: 16 days

Interventiondays (Median)
TPI With Normal Saline3
TPI With Lidocaine & Triamcinolone Acetonide1

[back to top]

The Block Level of Epidural Anesthesia

The block level 20mins after epidural anesthesia and it is verified by the loss of sensation to alcohol swab before target controlled infusion of propofol.It is the number of block segments.The block level varies from 0 to 10(0, no block level; 1 to 5, narrow block level;6 to 10, wide block level). (NCT02135016)
Timeframe: 20 mins after epidural anesthesia

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
1% Lidocaine6.5
2% Lidocaine4.2
0.9% Normal Saline0

[back to top]

The Mean Blood Pressure

The mean arterial pressure of each patient will be recorded at four different time points, as follows, baseline(the awake phase before epidural anesthesia), 10 mins after epidural anesthesia, 20 mins after epidural anesthesia, loss of consciousness(when the participants are lost eyelash reflex during propofol TCI induction of anesthesia). (NCT02135016)
Timeframe: The participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia induction, an expected average of half an hour

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline10mins after epidural aneasthesia20mins after epidural aneasthesiaLoss of consciousness
0.9% Normal Saline95.995.596.182.7
1% Lidocaine95.485.979.374.0
2% Lidocaine95.183.780.574.5

[back to top]

The Heart Rate

The heart rate of each patient will be recorded at three different four points, as follows, baseline(the awake phase before epidural anesthesia), 10mins after epidural anesthesia, 20 mins after epidural anesthesia, loss of consciousness(when the participants are lost eyelash reflex during propofol TCI induction of anesthesia). (NCT02135016)
Timeframe: The participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia induction, an expected average of half an hour

,,
Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Baseline10mins after epidural aneasthesia20mins after epidural aneasthesiaLoss of consciousness
0.9% Normal Saline71.371.370.363.2
1% Lidocaine71.469.868.563.2
2% Lidocaine72.869.267.262.3

[back to top]

The Bispectral Index

The bispectral index (BIS) of each patient will be recorded at four different time points,as follows, baseline(the awake phase before epidural anesthesia),10 mins after epidural anesthesia, 20 mins after epidural anesthesia, loss of consciousness(when the participants are lost eyelash reflex during propofol TCI induction of anesthesia). BIS values varies from 0 to 100(0, no cerebral activity; 40 to 60, general anesthesia; 60 to 85, sedated; 85 to 100, awake). (NCT02135016)
Timeframe: The participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia induction, an expected average of half an hour

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline10mins after epidural aneasthesia20mins after epidural aneasthesiaLoss of consciousness
0.9% Normal Saline95.794.594.966.1
1% Lidocaine95.485.384.665.7
2% Lidocaine95.485.183.865.3

[back to top]

The Effect-site Concentration of Propofol

The effect-site concentration of propofol when loss of consciousness during propofol target-controlled infusing(TCI) induction of anesthesia. (NCT02135016)
Timeframe: The participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia induction, an expected average of half an hour

Interventionµg/ml (Mean)
1% Lidocaine1.51
2% Lidocaine1.99
0.9% Normal Saline2.68

[back to top]

Change in the Intensity of Brush Sensation

"The intensity of brush sensation (application of SENSELab Brush-05) was measured on 0-10 scale, where 5 represents normal sensation (comparable to contralateral non-painful extremity). Higher scores indicate increased sensitivity (10= painful brushing sensation); lower scores represent reduced sensitivity (0=no brushing sensation)" (NCT02148588)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 min

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline30 min after block
The Entire Cohort4.51.0

[back to top]

Change in the Intensity of Cold Sensation

"The intensity of cold sensation (application of roller cooled down to 20 degrees Celsius) was measured on 0-10 scale, where 5 represents normal sensation (comparable to contralateral non-painful extremity). Higher scores indicate increased sensitivity (10= painful cold); lower scores represent reduced sensitivity (0=no cold sensation)" (NCT02148588)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 min

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Baseline30 min after the block
The Entire Cohort70.0

[back to top]

Change in the Intensity of Pinprick Sensation

"The intensity of pinprick sensation (application of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament #6.1, ~100g target force) was measured on 0-10 scale, where 5 represents normal sensation (comparable to contralateral non-painful extremity). Higher scores indicate increased sensitivity (10= painful sharp); lower scores represent reduced sensitivity (0=no pricking sensation)" (NCT02148588)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 min

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline30 min after block
The Entire Cohort5.01.1

[back to top]

Change in the Intensity of Warm Sensation

"The intensity of warm sensation (application of roller heated up to 40 degrees Celsius) was measured on 0-10 scale, where 5 represents normal sensation (comparable to contralateral non-painful extremity). Higher scores indicate increased sensitivity (10= painful hot); lower scores represent reduced sensitivity (0=no warmth sensation)" (NCT02148588)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 min

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline30 min after the block
The Entire Cohort5.90.5

[back to top]

Reduction in Spontaneous Pain Intensity After a Peripheral Nerve Block.

"Reduction in spontaneous pain intensity in the painful extremity from baseline to 30 minutes after a peripheral nerve block.Spontaneous pain intensity was measured on 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 represents no pain, and 10 represents worst pain imaginable" (NCT02148588)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Baseline pain intensityPain intensity after the block
The Entire Cohort6.50.0

[back to top]

Reported Pain/Dysesthesia Descriptors on NPSI Questionnaire

"Composite scores on NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory) questionnaire before and 40 minutes after the peripheral nerve block.~The NPSI assesses participant ranking of specific neuropathic pain descriptors, each ranked on a 0-10 scale, where 0 represents no burning/squeezing/electric shocks (etc), and 10 represents worst burning/squeezing/electric shocks (etc).~The scores on individual questions are grouped (averaged) into the three following subscales (each subscale scores ranging from 0 to 10):~Burning pain~Paroxysmal pain~Paresthesia/dysesthesia" (NCT02148588)
Timeframe: baseline and 40 min

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Burning pain- baselineburning pain - 40 min after blockparoxysmal pain - baselineParoxysmal pain - 40 min after blockparesthesia/dysesthesia - baselineparesthesia/dysesthesia - 40 min after block
The Entire Cohort4.10.02.60.03.60.9

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Complete or Partial Ablation of the Treated Cyst

Complete or partial ablation of cysts will be defined by the presence of a persistent cystic structure, and its volume and maximum diameter, as determined by cross-sectional imaging studies (CT, MR) (NCT02158039)
Timeframe: 1 year after final treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ablation of treated cystGreater than or equal to 80% cyst volume reductionLess than 80% cyst volume reductionCyst volume increase
Pancreatic Cyst Ethanol Injection210101

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

Adverse events include pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, any other occurrence resulting in hospitalization, medical treatment, surgery, death, or disability (NCT02158039)
Timeframe: 1 year after final treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of participants with adverse eventsNumber of participants without adverse events
Pancreatic Cyst Ethanol Injection716

[back to top]

Differences in Patients' Perceptions of Pain Between Treatment Methods

The visual analog pain scale is a patient-reported measure of pain on a 10-point scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst possible pain. The visual analog pain score will be completed at the following time points: pre injection, during injection, and during catheter insertion. (NCT02162680)
Timeframe: at pre injection, during anesthetic injection, and during catheter insertion, up to approximately 1 minute

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pain pre injectionPain during catheter insertionPain during study drug injection
Bacteriostatic Normal Saline (BNS)00.6090.781
Lidocaine00.1970.727
no Local Anesthetic0.0151.909NA

[back to top]

Time to First Bowel Movement

(NCT02164929)
Timeframe: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an estimated 1 week

Interventiondays (Mean)
Paravertebral Block1
TAP Block2
Epidural1
No Block (PCA Alone)2

[back to top]

Quality of Recovery

Quality of Recovery Score (QoR-15) is measured on a scale of 0-150 (0=poor, 150 = excellent). Scores were collected daily for 72 hours and then averaged. (NCT02164929)
Timeframe: 72 hours

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Paravertebral Block89.5
TAP Block117
Epidural115.5
No Block (PCA Alone)99

[back to top]

Postoperative Opioid Consumption

If opioid other than fentanyl is used, the dose will be converted to morphine equivalent. (NCT02164929)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventionmcg (Mean)
Paravertebral Block734
TAP Block666
Epidural125
No Block (PCA Alone)1017.5

[back to top]

Pain Scores

"Pain scores at rest and with activity using a verbal rating scales (VRS) of 0-10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain ever, at 30, 60, 90, 120 min and every 6 hours for 24 hours and every 12 hours for 48 hours and once a day thereafter until discharge. Data were collected at the indicated time points and an average pain score was calculated." (NCT02164929)
Timeframe: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an estimated 1 week

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Paravertebral Block4.66
TAP Block2.66
Epidural1.75
No Block (PCA Alone)6

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Length of Stay

(NCT02164929)
Timeframe: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an estimated 1 week

InterventionDays (Mean)
Paravertebral Block2.66
TAP Block4.33
Epidural4
No Block (PCA Alone)3.5

[back to top]

Time to First Ingestion of Solid Food

(NCT02164929)
Timeframe: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an estimated 1 week

InterventionDays (Mean)
Paravertebral Block1
TAP Block2
Epidural0.75
No Block (PCA Alone)1.5

[back to top]

Injector Ease of Use on an 11-Point Scale

The injectors rated the ease of injection and ease of modeling of the product on an 11-point scale from 0 (extremely difficult) to 10 (extremely easy). (NCT02176421)
Timeframe: Day 0

InterventionScores on a Scale (Mean)
VOLBELLA® With Lidocaine9.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Assessed by the Investigator as Very Well Improved or Well Improved on the 5-Point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)

The Investigator evaluated the subjects global aesthetic improvement on right and left sides using the 5-point GAIS (1=Very Well Improved, 2=Well Improved, 3=Improved, 4=Not Improved, 5=Worsened State). The percentage of subjects assessed as Very Well Improved and Well Improved are reported. (NCT02176421)
Timeframe: Day 0, Day 14, Month 1, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12

InterventionPercentage of Subjects (Number)
Day 0 Very Well Improved Right SideDay 0 Very Well Improved Left SideDay 0 Well Improved Right SideDay 0 Well Improved Left SideDay 14 Very Well Improved Right Side (N=60)Day 14 Very Well Improved Left Side (N=60)Day 14 Well Improved Right Side (N=60)Day 14 Well Improved Left Side (N=60)Month 1 Very Well Improved Right Side (N=76)Month 1 Very Well Improved Left Side (N=75)Month 1 Well Improved Right Side (N=76)Month 1 Well Improved Left Side (N=75)Month 6 Very Well Improved Right Side (N=73)Month 6 Very Well Improved Left Side (N=73)Month 6 Well Improved Right Side (N=73)Month 6 Well Improved Left Side (N=73)Month 9 Very Well Improved Right Side (N=72)Month 9 Very Well Improved Left Side (N=72)Month 9 Well Improved Right Side (N=72)Month 9 Well Improved Left Side (N=72)Month 12 Very Well Improved Right Side (N=71)Month 12 Very Well Improved Left Side (N=71)Month 12 Well Improved Right Side (N=71)Month 12 Well Improved Left Side (N=71)
VOLBELLA® With Lidocaine4543343768632730576538314037384218182526662327

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With a ≥1 Grade Improvement From Baseline in Infra-Orbital Area on the Allergan Infra-Orbital Rating Scale (AIRS) on the Right and Left Side

The Investigator evaluated the severity of skin crease and volume loss in the infra-orbital area on both the right and left sides on the 6-point AIRS ranging from 0 (least severe) to 5 (most severe). (NCT02176421)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1

InterventionPercentage of Subjects (Number)
Right SideLeft Side
VOLBELLA® With Lidocaine99100

[back to top]

Subject Overall Eye Appearance Total Score on the 5-Point Periorbital Aesthetic Appearance Questionnaire (PAAQ)

Subjects assessed their overall eye appearance on the PAAQ. The PAAQ includes 9 questions about how the subject's overall eye appearance affected them over the past 7 days. Each question is assessed on a 5-point scale from 0 (never/best) to 4 (all of the time/worse), with the total score ranging from 0 (best) to 36 (worse). (NCT02176421)
Timeframe: Day 0, Day 14, Month 1, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12

InterventionScores on a Scale (Mean)
Day 0Day 14Month 1Month 6Month 9Month 12
VOLBELLA® With Lidocaine19.37.46.09.59.910.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Assessed by the Subjects as Very Well Improved or Well Improved on the 5-Point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)

The subjects evaluated their global aesthetic improvement on the right and left sides using the 5-point GAIS (1=Very Well Improved, 2=Well Improved, 3=Improved, 4=Not Improved, 5=Worsened State). The percentage of subjects assessed as Very Well Improved and Well Improved are reported. (NCT02176421)
Timeframe: Day 0, Day 14, Month 1, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12

InterventionPercentage of Subjects (Number)
Day 0 Very Well Improved Right SideDay 0 Very Well Improved Left SideDay 0 Well Improved Right SideDay 0 Well Improved Left SideDay 14 Very Well Improved Right Side (N=60)Day 14 Very Well Improved Left Side (N=60)Day 14 Well Improved Right Side (N=60)Day 14 Well Improved Left Side (N=60)Month 1 Very Well Improved Right Side (N=76)Month 1 Very Well Improved Left Side (N=75)Month 1 Well Improved Right Side (N=76)Month 1 Well Improved Left Side (N=75)Month 6 Very Well Improved Right Side (N=73)Month 6 Very Well Improved Left Side (N=73)Month 6 Well Improved Right Side (N=73)Month 6 Well Improved Left Side (N=73)Month 9 Very Well Improved Right Side (N=72)Month 9 Very Well Improved Left Side (N=72)Month 9 Well Improved Right Side (N=72)Month 9 Well Improved Left Side (N=72)Month 12 Very Well Improved Right Side (N=73)Month 12 Very Well Improved Left Side (N=73)Month 12 Well Improved Right Side (N=73)Month 12 Well Improved Left Side (N=73)
VOLBELLA® With Lidocaine211838364340353839433230221829301917262516122325

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With a ≥1 Grade Improvement From Baseline in Infra-Orbital Area on the AIRS on the Right and Left Side

The Investigator evaluated the severity of skin crease and volume loss in the infra-orbital area on both the right and left sides on the 6-point AIRS ranging from 0 (least severe) to 5 (most severe). (NCT02176421)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 0, Day 14, Month 6, Momth 9, Month 12

InterventionPercentage of Subjects (Number)
Day 0 Right SideDay 0 Left SideDay 14 Right Side (N=60)Day 14 Left Side (N=60)Month 6 Right Side (N=73)Month 6 Left Side (N=73)Month 9 Right Side (N=72)Month 9 Left Side (N=72)Month 12 Right Side (N=71)Month 12 Left Side (N=71)
VOLBELLA® With Lidocaine999998100939281835559

[back to top]

VAS for Pain Score During Local Anesthesia Infiltration

"The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain is a validated tool used to measure pain. A 100mm horizontal line anchored by no pain (score of 0) and pain as bad as it could be (score of 100)." (NCT02209272)
Timeframe: baseline to 5-10 minutes later -- immediately after local anesthetic injection administration

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Bacteriostatic Saline13.2
Buffered Lidocaine14

[back to top]

VAS for Pain Score During Subsequent Hip Joint Injection (Local Anesthetic Efficacy)

"The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain is a validated tool used to measure pain. A 100mm horizontal line anchored by no pain (score of 0) and pain as bad as it could be (score of 100)." (NCT02209272)
Timeframe: baseline to 5-10 minutes later -- immediately after hip joint injection

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Bacteriostatic Saline20.7
Buffered Lidocaine15.6

[back to top]

Anesthetic Infiltration Duration

Anesthetic infiltration duration will be measured using a timer on the ultrasound machine, with goal administration between 20-40 seconds. (NCT02209272)
Timeframe: baseline

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Bacteriostatic Saline33.3
Buffered Lidocaine32.7

[back to top]

Percent Change in Peak Pain Intensity

Primary outcome was percent change from baseline in mean pain intensity at Cmax (transformed Gracely Scale; 0-35). Higher values on the Gracely scale represent greater pain intensity; the greater the percent change from baseline in mean pain intensity, the bigger the reduction in pain intensity. (NCT02218203)
Timeframe: 30 minutes post-infusion (Cmax)

Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
Dextromethorphan/ 0mg/kg Lidocaine Combination-2.5
Dextromethorphan/1mg/kg Lidocaine Combination-7.9
Dextromethorphan/2mg/kg Lidocaine Combination-11.2
Dextromethorphan/4mg/kg Lidocaine Combination-19.2

[back to top]

Intensity of Pain

Visual Analog Pain Scores on a scale of 0 to 10 (0=no pain and 10=worst pain) (NCT02219321)
Timeframe: Immediately after continuous 4-hours Intravenous lidocaine infusion

Interventionunits on a scale 0 to 10 (Median)
Lidocaine Infusion8
Saline Infusion3

[back to top]

Withdrawal Time (Seconds)

The time to withdraw at the Cold Pressor Task immediately after 4-hours intravenous continuous lidocaine infusion (NCT02219321)
Timeframe: Immediately after Lidocaine Infusion

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Lidocaine Infusion61
Saline Infusion41.5

[back to top]

Avoidance of Neck Surgery

The primary outcome variable is the avoidance of surgery. Treatment success is defined as the avoidance of surgery, while treatment failure is defined as having surgery due to failure of the injection treatment to alleviate pain and improve function over the 12 months they are being followed for purposes of this study. Avoided neck surgery noted as 'Yes'; avoided neck surgery 'No' the patient had neck surgery. (NCT02226159)
Timeframe: 12 months after the first injection

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
No(had surgery)Yes (Did not have surgery)
Lidocaine243
Lidocaine With Dexamethasone206

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction

Patient satisfaction with the treatment. Scale is an inverse of verbal numeric pain score. A 0 on VNPS equates to a 10 on patient satisfaction, 10 on VNPS equates to 0 on patient satisfaction (NCT02226159)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine7.0
Lidocaine With Dexamethasone7.8

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction

Patient satisfaction with the treatment. Scale is an inverse of verbal numeric pain score. A 0 on VNPS equates to a 10 on patient satisfaction, 10 on VNPS equates to 0 on patient satisfaction (NCT02226159)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine6.3
Lidocaine With Dexamethasone6.2

[back to top]

Numeric Pain Score

Verbal Numeric Pain Scale-Scaled 0-10 with 10 being worst imaginable pain and 0 being no pain (NCT02226159)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine3.6
Lidocaine With Dexamethasone3.4

[back to top]

Numeric Pain Score

Verbal Numeric Pain Scale-Scaled 0-10 with 10 being worst imaginable pain and 0 being no pain (NCT02226159)
Timeframe: 6 Months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine3.0
Lidocaine With Dexamethasone2.2

[back to top]

Disability

Neck Disability Index- The NDI consists of 10 questions. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 (minimum) - 5(maximum). The maximum score is therefore 50. The obtained score can be multiplied by 2 to produce a percentage score (i.e. a score of 50 indicates 100% disability). Scores are reported as the percentage (i.e. 100 is the max score for data presented). (NCT02226159)
Timeframe: 12 Months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine16.4
Lidocaine With Dexamethasone15.4

[back to top]

Numeric Pain Scre

Verbal Numeric Pain Scale (VNPS) -Scaled 0-10 with 10 being worst imaginable pain and 0 being no pain (NCT02226159)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine3.7
Lidocaine With Dexamethasone3.8

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction

Patient satisfaction with the treatment. Scale is an inverse of verbal numeric pain score. A 0 on VNPS equates to a 10 on patient satisfaction, 10 on VNPS equates to 0 on patient satisfaction (NCT02226159)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine7.2
Lidocaine With Dexamethasone6.8

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction

Patient satisfaction with the treatment. Scale is an inverse of verbal numeric pain score. A 0 on VNPS equates to a 10 on patient satisfaction, 10 on VNPS equates to 0 on patient satisfaction (NCT02226159)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine6.4
Lidocaine With Dexamethasone6.6

[back to top]

Disability

Neck Disability Index- The NDI consists of 10 questions. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 (minimum) - 5(maximum). The maximum score is therefore 50. The obtained score can be multiplied by 2 to produce a percentage score (i.e. a score of 50 indicates 100% disability). Scores are reported as the percentage (i.e. 100 is the max score for data presented). (NCT02226159)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine25.1
Lidocaine With Dexamethasone18.3

[back to top]

Disability

Neck Disability Index- The NDI consists of 10 questions. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 (minimum) - 5(maximum). The maximum score is therefore 50. The obtained score can be multiplied by 2 to produce a percentage score (i.e. a score of 50 indicates 100% disability). Scores are reported as the percentage (i.e. 100 is the max score for data presented). (NCT02226159)
Timeframe: 6 Months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine19.4
Lidocaine With Dexamethasone16.3

[back to top]

Disability

Neck Disability Index (NDI) - The NDI consists of 10 questions. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 (minimum) - 5(maximum). The maximum score is therefore 50. The obtained score can be multiplied by 2 to produce a percentage score (i.e. a score of 50 indicates 100% disability). Scores are reported as the percentage (i.e. 100 is the max score for data presented). (NCT02226159)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine25.2
Lidocaine With Dexamethasone22.8

[back to top]

Numeric Pain Score

Verbal Numeric Pain Scale-Scaled 0-10 with 10 being worst imaginable pain and 0 being no pain (NCT02226159)
Timeframe: 12 Months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine2.9
Lidocaine With Dexamethasone3.2

[back to top]

Mean Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Pain Reduction

Total pain reduction (mouth and throat) was measured by the numerical analogue scale of mouth pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0=no pain and 10=worst pain in the questionnaires taken at baseline, and 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes after assigned treatment for doxepin or DLA vs. placebo. The total pain reduction was calculated by the (average of mouth and throat) area under the curve (AUC) adjusting for baseline, with time scale (baseline, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 minutes post treatment) replaced by a numerical scale of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 respectively. The AUC was prorated when there are terminal missing data. If the missing data were intermittent, simple imputation by trapezoidal rules were applied to calculate the AUC. If a patient cancelled, was missing baseline data, or only provided baseline data, he/she was excluded from the statistical analysis. (NCT02229539)
Timeframe: Baseline, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes post treatment

Interventionunits on a scale*time scale (Mean)
Doxepin11.9
DLA (Diphenhydramine, Lidocaine and Antacid)11.7
Placebo8.7

[back to top]

Pain Intensity

"A blinded independent observer will rate pain on Propofol injection according to a pain scale.~No pain.~Mild pain(associated with facial expression of pain).~Moderate Pain(Pulling/withdrawal of arm).~Severe Pain(Screaming)." (NCT02240628)
Timeframe: During Propofol injection.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
1234
Propofol -Saline Mixture61368
Propofol-Lidocaine Mixture20912

[back to top]

Number of Children in Each Group Who Don't Feel Pain or Have Mild Pain on Propofol Injection.

(NCT02240628)
Timeframe: During propofol injection.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Propofol-Lidocaine Mixture29
Propofol -Saline Mixture19

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Serious Adverse Reactions From Superior Hypogastric Nerve Block

Number of patients with Grade C/D/E/F adverse events (Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) Classification). Per Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) Classification: Grade C, require therapy, brief hospitalization (<48 hours); Grade D, require major therapy, unplanned increased level of care, prolonged hospitalization (>48 hours); Grade E, permanent adverse sequelae; Grade F, death. (NCT02270255)
Timeframe: 10 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Control Group0
Sup Hypogastric Nerve Block Group0

[back to top]

mg Equivalent Morphine Used Until Discharge From Recovery Room to Control Pain Level Below 4/10 (VAS)

mg equivalent morphine used until discharge from recovery room to maintain pain level below 4/10 (visual analog scale 0/10=no pain to 10/10=worse pain the patient could imagine) (NCT02270255)
Timeframe: 6 hrs (from time of end of UFE to time of discharge from recovery room)

Interventionmg (Mean)
Control Group11
Sup Hypogastric Nerve Block Group5.1

[back to top]

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure

Change from baseline in diastolic blood pressure. (NCT02285634)
Timeframe: baseline, 30 minutes

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Oxymetazoline 0.05%5.7
Phenylephrine 0.25%7.9
Lidocaine 1% Plus Epinephrine 1:100,0006.2
Bacteriostatic 0.9% NaCL9.3

[back to top]

Change in Heart Rate

Change from baseline in heart rate. (NCT02285634)
Timeframe: baseline, 30 minutes

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Oxymetazoline 0.05%2.8
Phenylephrine 0.25%5.2
Lidocaine 1% Plus Epinephrine 1:100,0007.5
Bacteriostatic 0.9% NaCL6.8

[back to top]

Change in Mean Arterial Blood Pressure

Change in mean arterial blood pressure from the baseline measurement (NCT02285634)
Timeframe: baseline, 30 minutes

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Oxymetazoline 0.05%5.1
Phenylephrine 0.25%6.4
Lidocaine 1% Plus Epinephrine 1:100,0004.6
Bacteriostatic 0.9% NaCL6.5

[back to top]

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure

Change from baseline in systolic blood pressure. (NCT02285634)
Timeframe: baseline, 30 minutes

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Oxymetazoline 0.05%7.5
Phenylephrine 0.25%8.2
Lidocaine 1% Plus Epinephrine 1:100,0003.5
Bacteriostatic 0.9% NaCL8.9

[back to top]

Pain

Measure of pain on a scale of 0-10. Zero would indicate no pain while a score of 10 would be the worse pain possible. (NCT02288364)
Timeframe: immediately on completion of anesthetizing the parenchyma (deeper breast tissue), within approximately 4 minutes of starting

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
1% Lidocaine2.98
1% Lidocaine Plus Sodium Bicarbonate2.02

[back to top]

Pain

Measure of pain on a scale of 0-10. Zero would indicate no pain while a score of 10 would be the worse pain possible. (NCT02288364)
Timeframe: immediately prior to anesthetizing, within approximately 1 minute of starting

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
1% Lidocaine1.19
1% Lidocaine Plus Sodium Bicarbonate0.56

[back to top]

Pain

Measure of pain on a scale of 0-10. Zero would indicate no pain while a score of 10 would be the worse pain possible. (NCT02288364)
Timeframe: immediately on completion of the biopsy, within approximately 20 minutes of starting

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
1% Lidocaine1.45
1% Lidocaine Plus Sodium Bicarbonate0.91

[back to top]

Pain

Measure of pain on a scale of 0-10. Zero would indicate no pain while a score of 10 would be the worse pain possible. (NCT02288364)
Timeframe: immediately on completion of anesthetizing the skin, within approximately 1 minute of starting

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
1% Lidocaine2.07
1% Lidocaine Plus Sodium Bicarbonate1.61

[back to top]

Change in Placebo Corrected Change From Baseline QTc Interval on the ECG Measured in Milliseconds When Moxifloxacin is Administered With Diltiazem at the Evening Dose Compared to When Moxifloxacin is Administered Alone at Afternoon Dose on Treatment Day.

Evening dose (moxifloxacin+diltiazem) versus afternoon dose (diltiazem alone). (NCT02308748)
Timeframe: 5 weeks

Interventionms (Mean)
Moxifloxacin Alone29.9
Moxifloxacin + Diltiazem31.3

[back to top]

Change in Placebo Corrected Change From Baseline QTc and J-Tpeakc Intervals on the ECG Measured in Milliseconds When Dofetilide is Administered With Mexiletine or Lidocaine Compared to When Dofetilide is Administered Alone at Evening Dose on Treatment Day

After 3rd dose of mexiletine or lidocaine (evening dose) on treatment day when combined with dofetilide to evening dose on dofetilide alone day. (NCT02308748)
Timeframe: 5 weeks

,,
Interventionms (Mean)
Placebo corrected change from baseline in QTcPlacebo corrected change from baseline in J-Tpeakc
Dofetilide + Lidocaine183.5
Dofetilide + Mexiletine20.40.8
Dofetilide Alone37.924.0

[back to top]

Parental Observed Behavioral Distress Score

Measured by the accompanying parent using a Visual Analog Scale. The scale ranges from a minimum score of 0 (no distress at all) to a maximum of 10 (most distress possible). (NCT02314546)
Timeframe: 1 minute post-administration

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Saline Placebo0.08
Nasal Midazolam Only3.10
Midazolam Plus Xylocaine1.96

[back to top]

Verbal Complaint

Recorded by the administering RN at the time of administration. (NCT02314546)
Timeframe: At time of administration

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No ComplaintComplaint Reported
Midazolam Plus Xylocaine23
Nasal Midazolam Only14
Saline Placebo32

[back to top]

Sedation Scale Score

Measured by the administering RN. Measured as: agitated, alert, calm, drowsy, asleep. (NCT02314546)
Timeframe: 15 minutes post-sedation

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AgitatedAlertCalmDrowsyAsleep
Midazolam Plus Xylocaine01200
Nasal Midazolam Only01200
Saline Placebo01300

[back to top]

Time From Administration to Discharge

(NCT02314546)
Timeframe: Minutes from administration to discharge

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Saline Placebo87.0
Nasal Midazolam Only74.2
Midazolam Plus Xylocaine97.0

[back to top]

Sedation Scale Score

Measured by the administering RN. Measured as: agitated, alert, calm, drowsy, asleep. (NCT02314546)
Timeframe: 10 minutes post-sedation

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AgitatedAlertCalmDrowsyAsleep
Midazolam Plus Xylocaine02300
Nasal Midazolam Only02200
Saline Placebo01300

[back to top]

RN Observed Behavioral Distress Score

Measured by the administering RN using a Visual Analog Scale. The scale ranges from a minimum score of 0 (no distress at all) to a maximum of 10 (most distress possible). (NCT02314546)
Timeframe: 1 minute post-administration

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Saline Placebo0.1
Nasal Midazolam Only2.4
Midazolam Plus Xylocaine1.9

[back to top]

Verbal Complaints

Recorded by the administering RN at one minute post-administration (NCT02314546)
Timeframe: 1 minute post-administration

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No ComplaintComplaint Reported
Midazolam Plus Xylocaine41
Nasal Midazolam Only32
Saline Placebo50

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Nosebleeds From Time of Drug Administration to Discharge Home

Number of participants with nosebleeds recorded in the pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative record after study drug administration. (NCT02356705)
Timeframe: approximately 3 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Saline Placebo0
Nasal Midazolam Only0
Midazolam Plus Xylocaine0

[back to top]

Observational Distress Score 5 Min (Blinded Study Nurse Assessmnet)

Visual analog scale measured from 0cm (no distress) to 10cm (high level of distress) as measured by the blinded study nurse. (NCT02356705)
Timeframe: 5minutes

Interventioncm VAS (Median)
Saline Placebo0
Nasal Midazolam Only0.02
Midazolam Plus Xylocaine0

[back to top]

Observational Distress Score at 1 Minute (Blinded Study Nurse Assessment)

Visual analog scale measured from 0cm (no distress) to 10cm (high level of distress). Recorded by the blinded study nurse. (NCT02356705)
Timeframe: 1 minute

Interventioncm VAS (Median)
Saline Placebo0.02
Nasal Midazolam Only0.3
Midazolam Plus Xylocaine0.4

[back to top]

Time to Discharge

The time (in minutes) from release from the operating room to discharge home (NCT02356705)
Timeframe: approximately 3 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Saline Placebo35
Nasal Midazolam Only39.5
Midazolam Plus Xylocaine35.5

[back to top]

NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory) Descriptors of Pain at Baseline and 60 Min After Infusion

NPSI pain descriptors will be assessed prior to infusion of placebo and lidocaine (baseline) and again at 60 minutes post-infusion. Descriptors are expressed on a 0-10 scale; 0-minimum (least), and 10 maximum (worst) score. (NCT02363803)
Timeframe: Baseline to 60 minutes of initiating infusion

,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Does your pain feel like burning?Does your pain feel like squeezing?Does your pain feel like electric shocks?Does your pain feel like stabbing?Do you feel pins and needles?Do you feel tingling?
Lidocaine: 60 Minutes After Infusion Initiation000001
Lidocaine: Prior to Infusion320044
Normal Saline: 60 Minutes After Infusion Initiation000001
Normal Saline: Prior to Infusion320023

[back to top]

Evoked Mechanical and Thermal Sensation at Baseline and 60 Minutes After Infusion Initiation.

Thermal and mechanical responses will be assessed at baseline and 60 minutes after infusions. Evoked intensities measured on a 0-10 sensory scale, where 5 is normal sensation, a number lower than 5 is reduced sensation and a number higher than 5 is greater sensation. (NCT02363803)
Timeframe: - 60 minutes (baseline) and + 60 minutes of initiating infusion

,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Cold intensityHeat intensityBrush intensityPinprick intensity
Lidocaine: 60 Minutes After Infusion Initiation3143
Lidocaine: Prior to Infusion3254
Normal Saline: 60 Minutes After Infusion Initiation4243
Normal Saline: Prior to Infusion2244

[back to top]

Change in Spontaneous Pain Intensity as a Function of Baseline MPT

Correlation between Mechanical Pain Threshold (MPT in mN) at baseline and reduction in spontaneous pain intensity (% reduction on 0-10 NRS) at 60-120 minutes (averaged) from the study drug infusion. The slopes (Pearson coefficients) of the correlation obtained from lidocaine vs. placebo will be compared. (NCT02363803)
Timeframe: baseline to 60-120 minutes after starting the infusion

InterventionPearson coefficient (Number)
Normal Saline Infusion.249
Lidocaine Infusion.063

[back to top]

Change in Spontaneous Pain Intensity as a Function of Baseline HPT

Correlation between Heat Pain Threshold (HPT in degrees Celsius) at baseline and reduction in spontaneous pain intensity (% reduction on 0-10 NRS) at 60-120 minutes (averaged) from the study drug infusion. The slopes (Pearson coefficients) of the correlation obtained from lidocaine vs. placebo will be compared. (NCT02363803)
Timeframe: Baseline to 60-120 minutes after starting the infusion

InterventionPearson coefficient (Number)
Normal Saline Infusion.023
Lidocaine Infusion-.151

[back to top]

Change in Spontaneous Pain at 60-120 Minutes After Lidocaine Infusion Initiated (Assessed on 0-10 NRS)

Spontaneous pain will be assessed on numerical rating scale NRS (0= no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable) prior to infusion and then repeatedly for 120 minutes. The outcome measure will use the average of pain intensity measured at timepoints in the 60-120 min range after beginning of infusion. The mean %change in pain (from baseline) will be compared between lidocaine and placebo arms. (NCT02363803)
Timeframe: Baseline compared to 60-120 minutes after starting the infusion

Interventionpercentage of pain change from baseline (Mean)
Normal Saline Infusion33
Lidocaine Infusion51

[back to top]

Participants Anesthetic Preference

Patient will complete a questionnaire to evaluate his/her preference of anesthetic modality. (NCT02379221)
Timeframe: one week post treatment

Interventionparticipant preference selection (Number)
Injectable32
Topical16

[back to top]

Mean Pain Level Associated With the Local Anesthetic Injection

Participant will complete a questionnaire to evaluate his/her pain level perception using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during injection to the upper and lower lip. The Visual Analog scale uses a 10 cm horizontal line with 'no pain' labeled on the left end of line and 'worst pain' on the right end of line. Participant marks their pain level at any point on the line from no pain to worst pain. No pain= 0 cm, Worst pain=10cm (NCT02379221)
Timeframe: 5-10 minutes post-procedure

Interventionunit on a scale (Mean)
Upper Lip2.14
Lower Lip1.89

[back to top]

Mean Pain Level Associated With the Local Topical Anesthetic

Participant will complete a questionnaire to evaluate his/her pain level perception using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during application of topical anesthesia to the upper and lower lip. The Visual Analog scale uses a 10 cm horizontal line with 'no pain' labeled on the left end of line and 'worst pain' on the right end of line. Participant marks their pain level at any point on the line from no pain to worst pain. No pain= 0 cm, Worst pain=10cm (NCT02379221)
Timeframe: 5-10 min post procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Upper Lip0.05
Lower Lip0.11

[back to top]

Mean Pain Level Associated With Facial Filler Injection to the Lower Lip

A mean level of pain for all participants completing the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during injection of HA filler to the lower lip. The Visual Analog scale uses a 10 cm horizontal line with 'no pain' labeled on the left end of line and 'worst pain' on the right end of line. Participant marks their pain level at any point on the line from no pain to worst pain. No pain= 0 cm, Worst pain=10cm. The total score was divided by 48. (NCT02379221)
Timeframe: 5-10 minutes post procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Injectable1.47
Topical4.38

[back to top]

Mean Pain Level Associated With Facial Filler Injection at the Upper Lip

Participant will complete a questionnaire to evaluate his/her pain level perception using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during injection of HA filler to the upper lip. The Visual Analog scale uses a 10 cm horizontal line with 'no pain' labeled on the left end of line and 'worst pain' on the right end of line. Participant marks their pain level at any point on the line from no pain to worst pain. No pain= 0 cm, Worst pain=10cm (NCT02379221)
Timeframe: 5-10 minutes post procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Injectable0.89
Topical3.67

[back to top]

Mean Pain Level Associated With Facial Filler Injection to the Nasolabial Fold

Participant will complete a questionnaire to evaluate his/her pain level perception using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during injection of HA filler to the nasolabial fold. The Visual Analog scale uses a 10 cm horizontal line with 'no pain' labeled on the left end of line and 'worst pain' on the right end of line. Participant marks their pain level at any point on the line from no pain to worst pain. No pain= 0 cm, Worst pain=10cm (NCT02379221)
Timeframe: 5-10 minutes post procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Injectable0.76
Topical2.82

[back to top]

VAS Score at the Time of Pessary Removal Adjusting for Baseline Pain and Patient Age

Self-reported pain intensity at time of pessary removal after controlling for patient age and baseline pain score. Scale is from 0 to 10 centimeters (0=no pain and 10=worst pain) (NCT02380742)
Timeframe: Removal of Pessary

InterventionCentimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Lidocaine-prilocaine1.88
Placebo3.69

[back to top]

VAS Score at the Time of Pessary Removal Adjusting for Pessary Type and Investigator Training

Self-reported pain intensity at time of pessary removal after controlling for pessary type and investigator training level. Scale is from 0 to 10 centimeters (0=no pain and 10=worst pain) (NCT02380742)
Timeframe: Removal of Pessary

InterventionCentimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Lidocaine-prilocaine1.81
Placebo3.76

[back to top]

VAS Score at the Time of Pessary Insertion Adjusting for Baseline Pain

Practitioner's perception of patient's pain score at time of pessary insertion adjusting for baseline pain. Scale is from 0 to 10 centimeters (0=no pain and 10=worst pain) (NCT02380742)
Timeframe: Insertion of Pessary

InterventionCentimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Lidocaine-prilocaine0.61
Placebo1.68

[back to top]

VAS Score at the Time of Pessary Removal Adjusting for Baseline Pain

Self-reported pain intensity at time of pessary removal controlling for baseline pain. Scale is from 0 to 10 (0=no pain and 10=worst pain) (NCT02380742)
Timeframe: Removal of Pessary

InterventionCentimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Lidocaine-prilocaine1.76
Placebo3.81

[back to top]

Discomfort With Intranasal Midazolam Administration

"subject self-reports pain with intranasal midazolam utilizing the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale. This scale is a well-established ordinal pain scale for pediatric patients. It is one score (no subscales), with a minimum score of 0 (signifying No Hurt) and a maximum score of 10 (Hurts Worst). Values between include 2 (Hurts Little Bit), 4 (Hurts Little More), 6 (Hurts Even More), and 8 (Hurts Whole Lot.). Children indicate one value/answer. Thus, a higher score indicates a worse outcome (more pain)." (NCT02396537)
Timeframe: immediately after administration of intranasal midazolam

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Intranasal Lidocaine3
Intranasal 0.9% Saline8

[back to top]

Percentage of Improved Participants on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)-Subject

"Subject assessment at follow-up visits of aesthetic change from baseline of the treated areas using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS).~GAIS is a 5-graded scale: worse; no change; improved; much improved; or very much improved.~A clinically significant improvement was defined as a score of improved; much improved; or very much improved." (NCT02403986)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months, 12 Months, 15 Months, 18 Months

,
Intervention% improved participants (Number)
1 month3 months6 months9 months12 months15 months18 months
R. Vital Skinboosters Lidocaine (Three)91.779.278.377.381.881.081.0
R. Vital Skinboosters Lidocaine (Two)80.072.058.350.060.968.277.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Improved Participants on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)-Investigator

"Investigator assessment at follow-up visits of aesthetic change from baseline of the treated areas using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS).~GAIS is a 5-graded scale: worse; no change; improved; much improved; or very much improved.~A clinically significant improvement was defined as a score of improved; much improved; or very much improved." (NCT02403986)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months, 12 Months, 15 Months, 18 Months

,
Intervention% improved participants (Number)
1 month3 months6 months9 months12 months15 months18 months
R. Vital Skinboosters Lidocaine (Three)100.095.882.681.886.495.2100.0
R. Vital Skinboosters Lidocaine (Two)96.092.087.570.887.095.590.9

[back to top]

Satisfaction of Procedure as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability Using a Numerical Scale 1-5

"1= very dissatisfied to 5=very satisfied." (NCT02420041)
Timeframe: 2 weeks post-procedure

Interventionunits on a scale of satisfaction (Mean)
Fluoroscopic Guidance3.615
Ultrasound Guidance3.857

[back to top]

Satisfaction of Procedure as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability Using a Numerical Scale 1-5

"1= very dissatisfied to 5=very satisfied." (NCT02420041)
Timeframe: 3 months post-procedure

Interventionunits on a scale of satisfaction (Mean)
Fluoroscopic Guidance3.364
Ultrasound Guidance3.667

[back to top]

Impression of Change of Condition at 3 Months Post-procedure Using the PGIC Scale

Study subjects rate their change in overall condition on a scale of 0-6 (0=no change, 6=better and a definite improvement that has made a real worthwhile difference). The range of the change in pain for both groups observed was in fact 0-5. (NCT02420041)
Timeframe: 3 months post-procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Fluoroscopic Guidance2.818
Ultrasound Guidance2.222

[back to top]

Change in Pain Score From Baseline to 2 Weeks Post-procedure Using the DoD/VA PRS

Study subjects rate their pain on a scale of 0-10 (0=no pain, 10= the highest level of pain experienced), hence the lower the score the better the outcome. (NCT02420041)
Timeframe: 2 weeks post-procedure minus baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Fluoroscopic Guidance-1
Ultrasound Guidance-1.643

[back to top]

Impression of Change of Condition at 2 Weeks Post-procedure Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale

Study subjects rate their change in overall condition on a scale of 0-6 (0=no change, 6=better and a definite improvement that has made a real worthwhile difference). The range of the change in pain for both groups observed was in fact 0-5. (NCT02420041)
Timeframe: 2 weeks post-procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Fluoroscopic Guidance2.385
Ultrasound Guidance2.714

[back to top]

Change in Pain Score From Baseline to 3 Months Post-procedure Using the DoD/VA PRS

Study subjects rate their pain on a scale of 0-10 (0=no pain, 10= the highest level of pain experienced), hence the lower the score the better the outcome. (NCT02420041)
Timeframe: 3 months post-procedure minus baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Fluoroscopic Guidance-0.875
Ultrasound Guidance-1.556

[back to top]

Change in Pain Score From Baseline to 30 Minutes Pre-procedure Using the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DoD/VA PRS) 0-10

Study subjects rate their pain on a scale of 0-10 (0=no pain, 10= the highest level of pain experienced), hence the lower the score the better the outcome. (NCT02420041)
Timeframe: 30 minutes pre-procedure minus baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Fluoroscopic Guidance-2.571
Ultrasound Guidance-2.571

[back to top]

Change in Pain Score Since Sacroiliac (SI) Injection at 2 Weeks Post-procedure Using the DoD/VA PRS

Study subjects rate their pain on a scale of 0-10 (0=no pain, 10= the highest level of pain experienced), hence the lower the score the better the outcome. Score reported is reporting a difference/change between two time points. (NCT02420041)
Timeframe: during/just before sacroiliac (SI) injection and 2 weeks post-procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Fluoroscopic Guidance4.846
Ultrasound Guidance4.385

[back to top]

Change in Pain Score Since SI Injection at 3 Months Post-procedure Using the DoD/VA PRS

Study subjects rate their pain on a scale of 0-10 (0=no pain, 10= the highest level of pain experienced), hence the lower the score the better the outcome.Score reported is reporting a difference/change between two time points. (NCT02420041)
Timeframe: during/just before sacroiliac (SI) injection and 3 months post-procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Fluoroscopic Guidance4
Ultrasound Guidance4.333

[back to top]

Difference in Minutes Between a Sacroiliac Joint Injection Done With Ultrasound vs Fluoroscopy

during procedure from the time monitors are placed on patient to the time of withdrawal of needle from skin (NCT02420041)
Timeframe: difference in minutes between a sacroiliac joint injection, an expected average of 9 minutes

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Fluoroscopic Guidance9.471
Ultrasound Guidance9.552

[back to top]

Degree of Triggering

A Green classification number (0-4) is given to each subject pre-injection and at 6 weeks post-injection based on their degree of triggering. 0 = No triggering, no pain; 1 = Pre-triggering; pain, history of catching, but not demonstrable on physical examination; tenderness over the A1 pulley; 2 = Active; demonstrable catching, but the patient can actively extend the digit; 3= Passive; demonstrable catching requiring passive extension or inability to actively flex; and 4 = Contracture; demonstrable catching with a fixed flexion contracture of the PIP joint. (NCT02421419)
Timeframe: Patients are assessed pre-injection objectively by investigator and at 6 weeks post-injection subjectively via Patient Survey

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Green classification 0 (pre-injection)Green classification 1 (pre-injection)Green classification 2 (pre-injection)Green classification 3 (pre-injection)Green Classification 4 (pre-injection)Green classification 0 (6-weeks post-injection)Green classification 1 (6-weeks post-injection)Green classification 2 (6-weeks post-injection)Green classification 3 (6-weeks post-injection)Green classification 4 (6-weeks post-injection)
Corticosteroid Alone (CS) Group0240020220
Corticosteroid/Lidocaine (CSL) Group01100010271
Corticosteroid/Saline (CSS) Group0160110421

[back to top]

VAS

Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) - measurement of pain on scale of 0 (least) to 10 (worst). (NCT02421419)
Timeframe: Patients are assessed pre-injection (baseline), 1 minute post-injection, 10 minutes post-injection, at 6 weeks post-injection and also asked to recollect their pain at time of injection when seen at 6 weeks post-injection

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
VAS pre-injectionVAS 1 minute post-injectionVAS 10 minutes post-injectionVAS 6 weeks post-injectionVAS Recollection
Corticosteroid Alone (CS) Group2.22.32.11.55.2
Corticosteroid/Lidocaine (CSL) Group3.02.21.23.36.6
Corticosteroid/Saline (CSS) Group3.94.93.34.05.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Effects

Incidence of adverse effects (NCT02421419)
Timeframe: Patients are assessed 1 minute post-injection, 10 minutes post-injection, and at 6 week post-injection.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Adverse effects 1 minute post-injectionAdverse effects 10 minutes post-injectionAdverse effects 6 weeks post-injection
Corticosteroid Alone (CS) Group000
Corticosteroid/Lidocaine (CSL) Group000
Corticosteroid/Saline (CSS) Group000

[back to top]

Presence of Triggering

Patients are asked how often their finger triggers - not at all, rarely, occasionally, or frequently at time intervals indicated in the outcome measure time frame. Count of participants for each of these answers was collected. (NCT02421419)
Timeframe: Patients are assessed pre-injection (baseline), 1 minute post-injection, 10 minutes post-injection, and 6 weeks post-injection

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Triggering frequently pre-injectionTriggering not at all pre-injectionTriggering occasionally pre-injectionTriggering rarely pre-injectionTriggering not at all 1 minute post-injectionTriggering rarely 1 minute post-injectionTriggering occasionally 1 minute post-injectionTriggering frequently 1 minute post-injectionTriggering same as before 1 minute post-injectionTriggering not at all 10 minutes post-injectionTriggering rarely 10 minutes post-injectionTriggering occasionally 10 minutes post-injectionTriggering frequently 10 minutes post-injectionTriggering same as before 10 min. post-injectionTriggering not at all 6 wks post-injectionTriggering rarely 6 wks post-injectionTriggering occasionally 6 weeks post-injectionTriggering frequently 6 wks post-injectiontriggering same as before 6 wks post-injection
Corticosteroid Alone (CS) Group2040301024010130012
Corticosteroid/Lidocaine (CSL) Group7040101082011611018
Corticosteroid/Saline (CSS) Group5210300054000410025

[back to top]

Overall Satisfaction With Procedure as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale

This is the level of overall satisfaction self-reported by the patient at the completion of the procedure and prior to discharge. VAS ranged from 0 to 100 mm, 0 equals not satisfied, 100 equals highest satisfaction possible. (NCT02447029)
Timeframe: 30-45 minutes after completion of procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Active Comparator86
Standard Lidocaine Paracervical Block92.5

[back to top]

Overall Complication Rate as Measured by a Count of Participants in Each Group

(NCT02447029)
Timeframe: Rate of complications at the end of the study

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Active Comparator0
Standard Lidocaine Paracervical Block0

[back to top]

Difference in Pain Level at Time of Cervical Dilation as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale

This is the amount of pain self-reported by the patient at the time of cervical dilation. VAS ranged from 0 to 100 mm, 0 equals no pain, 100 equals worse pain imaginable. (NCT02447029)
Timeframe: At time of cervical dilation, 30 minutes after lidocaine administration

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Active Comparator68
Standard Lidocaine Paracervical Block65

[back to top]

Pain With Speculum Insertion as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale

This is the amount of pain self-reported by the patient at the time of speculum insertion. VAS ranged from 0 to 100 mm, 0 equals no pain, 100 equals worse pain imaginable. (NCT02447029)
Timeframe: Pain at time of speculum insertion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Active Comparator19.5
Standard Lidocaine Paracervical Block22.3

[back to top]

Pain With Tenaculum Placement as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale

This is the amount of pain self-reported by the patient at the time of tenaculum placement. VAS ranged from 0 to 100 mm, 0 equals no pain, 100 equals worse pain imaginable. (NCT02447029)
Timeframe: Pain at time of tenaculum placement

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Active Comparator39.8
Standard Lidocaine Paracervical Block32.4

[back to top]

Pain 30-45 Minutes After Procedure as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale

This is the amount of pain self-reported by the patient 30-45 minutes after procedure. VAS ranged from 0 to 100 mm, 0 equals no pain, 100 equals worse pain imaginable. (NCT02447029)
Timeframe: Pain prior to discharge home: 30-45 minutes after completion of procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Active Comparator9
Standard Lidocaine Paracervical Block11.5

[back to top]

Pain Level Prior to Procedure (Anticipated Pain) as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale

This is the amount of pain self-reported by the patient prior to the procedure (Anticipated pain). VAS ranged from 0 to 100 mm, 0 equals no pain, 100 equals worse pain imaginable. (NCT02447029)
Timeframe: Pain level prior to procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Active Comparator59
Standard Lidocaine Paracervical Block56

[back to top]

Pain After Placement of Laminaria (100 mm Visual Analog Scale)

We asked the participant to rate her pain on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) immediately after laminaria was placed. The VAS is a validated measure of pain where 0=no pain and 100=worst pain ever felt. (NCT02454296)
Timeframe: Measured within 10 seconds after placement of laminaria

Interventionunits on a scale (100 mm VAS) (Median)
Paracervical Block With Lidocaine13
Sham Paracervical Block54

[back to top]

Paracervical or Sham Block Pain

Participants reported her pain level on the 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) within 10 seconds after she received either the paracervical block or the sham block. The VAS is a validated measure of pain where 0=no pain and 100=worst pain ever felt. (NCT02454296)
Timeframe: Within 10 seconds after receiving paracervical or sham block

Interventionunits on a scale (100 mm VAS) (Median)
Paracervical Block Group14
Sham Block Group27

[back to top]

Satisfaction With Overall Pain Control (100 mm Visual Analog Scale)

Patients rated their satisfaction with overall pain control on the 100 mm VAS, with 0 as not satisfied at all and 100 as completely satisfied (NCT02454296)
Timeframe: 15 minutes post-operatively

Interventionunits on a scale (100 mm VAS) (Median)
Paracervical Block Group95
Sham Block Group70

[back to top]

Clinical Duration

"The clinical duration is the elapsed time for T1 recovery = 25% (Dur25%) of the original value of T1 after the infusion of cisatracurium.~This outcome meansure was presented in minutes." (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: Participants were followed during the anesthetic - surgical procedure, an average of 90 minutes

Interventionminutes (Median)
Group M82.68
Group ML86.33
Group C64.8

[back to top]

Final Recovery Index

"The final recovery index is the elapsed time between the T1 recovery = 25% (Dur25%) and T4 / T1 = 80% (TOF = 80%) after the infusion of cisatracurium.~This outcome measure was presented in minutes." (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: Participants were followed during the anesthetic - surgical procedure, an average of 90 minutes

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Group M27.97
Group ML33.81
Group C21.51

[back to top]

MAP - M7f (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 7f)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The mean blood pressure was recorded and annotated at various times such as 90 minutes after the traqueal intubation. This time point was named as moment '7f'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of average blood pressure was performed 90 minutes after the traqueal intubation

InterventionmmHg (Median)
Group M64.00
Group ML64.50
Group C72.00

[back to top]

HR - M1 (Heart Rate in the Moment 1)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The measure of heart rate was recorded and annotated at various times such as in the arrival of the patient in the operating room. This time point was named as moment '1'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of heart rate was performed when the patient arrived in the operating room

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Group M79.94
Group ML77.25
Group C73.66

[back to top]

HR - M3 (Heart Rate in the Moment 3)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The heart rate was recorded and annotated at various times such as immediately before the start of the infusion of the solution X (magnesium sulfate or isotonic solution) and Y solution (lidocaine or isotonic solution). This time point was named as moment '3'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of heart rate was performed immediately before the start of the infusion of the solution X (magnesium sulfate or isotonic solution) and Y solution (lidocaine or isotonic solution)

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Group M72.94
Group ML74.19
Group C75.40

[back to top]

HR - M4 (Heart Rate in the Moment 4)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The heart rate was recorded and annotated at various times such as in the end of the study solutions infusion. This time point was named as moment '4'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of heart rate was performed five minutes after M3 (in the end of the X and Y solutions infusion)

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Group M71.94
Group ML72.25
Group C65.07

[back to top]

HR - M5 (Heart Rate in the Moment 5)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The heart rate was recorded and annotated at various times such as immediately before the tracheal intubation. This time point was named as moment '5'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of heart rate was performed immediately before the tracheal intubation

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Group M67.56
Group ML69.31
Group C64.27

[back to top]

MAP - M1 (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 1)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The mean blood pressure was recorded and annotated at various times such as in the arrival of the patient in the operating room. This time point was named as moment '1'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of average blood pressure was performed when the patient arrived in the operating room

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Group M94.63
Group ML88.75
Group C100.10

[back to top]

Latency

"The latency is computed as the elapsed time to reduce the response of T1 to 5% of the initial contraction force after the infusion of cisatracurium.~This outcome meansure was presented in seconds." (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: Participants were followed during the anesthetic - surgical procedure, an average of 90 minutes

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Group M139.70
Group ML151.30
Group C147.80

[back to top]

HR - M6 (Heart Rate in the Moment 6)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The heart rate was recorded and annotated at various times such as one minute after the tracheal intubation. This time point was named as moment '6'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of heart rate was performed one minute after the tracheal intubation

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Group M66.50
Group ML68.19
Group C65.13

[back to top]

HR - M7a (Heart Rate in the Moment 7a)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The heart rate was recorded and annotated at various times such as 15 minutes after the traqueal intubation.This time point was named as moment '7a'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of heart rate was performed 15 minutes after the traqueal intubation

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Group M68.94
Group ML68.19
Group C67.13

[back to top]

Recovery Index

"The recovery index is the elapsed time between the T1 recovery =25% (Dur25%) and T1 =75% (Dur75%) after the infusion of cisatracurium.~This outcome meansure was presented in minutes." (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: Participants were followed during the anesthetic - surgical procedure, an average of 90 minutes

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Group M20.08
Group ML20.26
Group C14.53

[back to top]

MAP - M4 (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 4)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The mean blood pressure was recorded and annotated at various times such as in the end of the study solutions infusion.This time point was named as moment '4'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of average blood pressure was performed five minutes after M3 (in the end of the X and Y solutions infusion)

InterventionmmHg (Median)
Group M69.00
Group ML63.00
Group C74.00

[back to top]

HR - M7c (Heart Rate in the Moment 7c)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The heart rate was recorded and annotated at various times such as 45 minutes after the traqueal intubation. This time point was named as moment '7c'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of heart rate was performed 45 minutes after the traqueal intubation

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Group M65.75
Group ML65.75
Group C62.33

[back to top]

HR - M7f (Heart Rate in the Moment 7f)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The heart rate was recorded and annotated at various times such as 90 minutes after the traqueal intubation. This time point was named as moment '7f'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of heart rate was performed 90 minutes after the traqueal intubation

Interventionbeats/min (Median)
Group M66.00
Group ML61.00
Group C61.00

[back to top]

Spontaneous Recovery (T4/T1=90%)

"Spontaneous recovery is the elapsed time for the recovery of the TOF (T4 / T1) response to 90% of the original after infusion of cisatracurium.~This outcome measure was presented in minutes." (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: The participants were followed during the anesthetic - surgical procedure

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Group M120.20
Group ML126.70
Group C90.03

[back to top]

Total Duration (Dur95%)

"The total duration is the elapsed time for T1 recovery of the response to reach 95% of the initial after the infusion of cisatracurium.~This outcome measure was presented in minutes." (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: Participants were followed during the anesthetic - surgical procedure, an average of 90 minutes

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Group M113.20
Group ML120.10
Group C88.19

[back to top]

MAP - M7e (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 7e)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The mean blood pressure was recorded and annotated at various times such as 75 minutes after the traqueal intubation. This time point was named as moment '7e'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of average blood pressure was performed 75 minutes after the traqueal intubation

InterventionmmHg (Median)
Group M68.00
Group ML66.00
Group C69.00

[back to top]

MAP - M7d (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 7d)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The mean blood pressure was recorded and annotated at various times such as 60 minutes after the traqueal intubation. This time point was named as moment '7d'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of average blood pressure was performed 60 minutes after the traqueal intubation

InterventionmmHg (Median)
Group M68.00
Group ML62.00
Group C66.00

[back to top]

MAP - M7c (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 7c)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The mean blood pressure was recorded and annotated at various times such as 45 minutes after the traqueal intubation. This time point was named as moment '7c'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of average blood pressure was performed 45 minutes after the traqueal intubation

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Group M69.25
Group ML63.00
Group C69.00

[back to top]

HR - M7b (Heart Rate in the Moment 7b)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The heart rate was recorded and annotated at various times such as 30 minutes after the traqueal intubation. This time point was named as moment '7b'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of heart rate was performed 30 minutes after the traqueal intubation

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Group M67.44
Group ML68.38
Group C64.00

[back to top]

MAP - M7a (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 7a)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The mean blood pressure was recorded and annotated at various times such as 15 minutes after the traqueal intubation. This time point was named as moment '7a'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of average blood pressure was performed 15 minutes after the traqueal intubation

InterventionmmHg (Median)
Group M66.00
Group ML61.50
Group C69.00

[back to top]

MAP - M6 (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 6)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The mean blood pressure was recorded and annotated at various times such as one minute after the tracheal intubation. This time point was named as moment '6'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of average blood pressure was performed one minute after the tracheal intubation

InterventionmmHg (Median)
Group M64.50
Group ML64.00
Group C69.00

[back to top]

HR - M2 (Heart Rate in the Moment 2)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The heart rate was recorded and annotated at various times such as in the moment immediately before the anesthesia induction. This time point was named as moment '2'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of heart rate was performed immediately before induction of anesthesia

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Group M74.69
Group ML73.69
Group C75.40

[back to top]

HR - M7e (Heart Rate in the Moment 7e)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The heart rate was recorded and annotated at various times such as 75 minutes after the traqueal intubation. This time point was named as moment '7e'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of heart rate was performed 75 minutes after the traqueal intubation

Interventionbeats/min (Median)
Group M66.50
Group ML63.00
Group C58.00

[back to top]

MAP - M3 (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 3)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The mean blood pressure was recorded and annotated at various times such as immediately before the start of the infusion of the solution X (magnesium sulfate or isotonic solution) and Y solution (lidocaine or isotonic solution). This time point was named as moment '3'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of average blood pressure was performed immediately before the start of the infusion of the solution X (magnesium sulfate or isotonic solution) and Y solution (lidocaine or isotonic solution)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Group M75.88
Group ML73.88
Group C76.73

[back to top]

HR - M7d (Heart Rate in the Moment 7d)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The heart rate was recorded and annotated at various times such as 60 minutes after the traqueal intubation. This time point was named as moment '7d'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of heart rate was performed 60 minutes after the traqueal intubation

Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Group M66.19
Group ML65.31
Group C61.93

[back to top]

MAP - M2 (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 2)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The mean blood pressure was recorded and annotated at various times such as in the moment immediately before the anesthesia induction. This time point was named as moment '2'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of average blood pressure was performed immediately before induction of anesthesia

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Group M87.63
Group ML84.69
Group C92.47

[back to top]

MAP - M5 (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 5)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The mean blood pressure was recorded and annotated at various times such as immediately before the tracheal intubation. This time point was named as moment '5'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of average blood pressure was performed immediately before the tracheal intubation

InterventionmmHg (Median)
Group M62.50
Group ML61.50
Group C67.00

[back to top]

MAP - M7b (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 7b)

In the operating room, patients were cardiovascular, respiratory and body temperature monitored through the Dixtal 2020. The mean blood pressure was recorded and annotated at various times such as 30 minutes after the traqueal intubation. This time point was named as moment '7b'. (NCT02483611)
Timeframe: This measure of average blood pressure was performed 30 minutes after the traqueal intubation

InterventionmmHg (Median)
Group M66.50
Group ML63.50
Group C68.00

[back to top]

Change in FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) Score

The FLACC scale measures pain in children aged 2m-7y. The scale ranges from 0-10 with 0 being no pain. The total score out of 10 is based on 5 pieces of criteria, and each criteria is scored as either 0, 1, or 2. Scores on individual criteria are summed up to give a total score. Higher values represent a worse outcome of more pain. FLACC scores will be compared pre- and post-propofol induction to assess the change in FLACC score for each arm. (NCT02512783)
Timeframe: 1 minute before propofol induction compared to 1 minute following propofol induction

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine.82
Normal Saline2.43

[back to top]

Change in Pelvic Urgency, Pain, and Frequency (PUF) Questionnaire With Preemptive Pudendal Nerve Block Compared to Saline

"To determine the change in pelvic urgency, pain and frequency (PUF) questionnaire at baseline, 2 hours, 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months after hydrodistention with preemptive pudendal nerve block (1% Lidocaine) compared to hydrodistention with placebo (saline).~The Pelvic Urgency, Pain, and Frequency Patient Symptom Scale asks 11 questions, 7 on PUF symptoms, 4 on how bothersome PUF symptoms are. Symptom questions include 3, 4, or 5 ranked answers, with higher answers indicating more voids, or greater frequency of pain. The bother questions each of 4 ranked answers from 0-never, to 3-always. The symptom score is added, the bother score is added, and then the total score is added. The total PUF score is then reported. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 35, and a higher score indicates greater symptoms and higher bother from pelvic pain and frequency." (NCT02517996)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 hours, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months (Up to 3 months)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline2 weeks6 weeks12 weeks
1% Lidocaine22.6318.8318.217.2
Normal Saline1917.416.714

[back to top]

Change in IC Symptom Index Questionnaire With Preemptive Pudendal Nerve Block Compared to Saline

"To determine the change in interstitial cystitis symptom index at baseline, 2 hours, 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months after hydrodistention with preemptive pudendal nerve block (1% Lidocaine) compared to hydrodistention with placebo (saline).~The IC symptom index questionnaire consists of 4 questions on IC symptoms. 2 of the questions have 6 answer choices ranging from 0-never, to 5-almost always. 1 question has 6 answer choices ranging from 0-never to 5-usually. 1 question has 7 answer choices ranging from 0-never to 6-5 or more times. The numerical score for each question are added together, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 21. A higher score indicates greater severity of IC symptoms." (NCT02517996)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months (Up to 3 months)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline2 weeks6 weeks12 weeks
1% Lidocaine12.511.4311.810
Normal Saline1098.675

[back to top]

Change in Pain Level as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

"To determine the change in pain at 2 hours, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively in patients undergoing hydrodistention with preemptive pudendal nerve block (1% Lidocaine) compared to hydrodistention with placebo (saline) using the visual analog scale (VAS).~VAS consists of a 10cm horizontal line with the minimum endpoint labeled no pain (0) and maximum labeled worst pain ever (10). Patients placed a mark on the point that corresponds to the level of pain severity they felt. The cm distance from the low end of the VAS to the patient's mark is used as the numerical index of the intensity of pain. Pain scores of 3.0-5.4 cm are moderate, over 5.4 indicates severe pain." (NCT02517996)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 hours, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months (Up to 3 months)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Pre operative VAS scorePost operative VAS score2 week post operative VAS scores6 week post operative VAS score12 weeks post operative VAS score
1% Lidocaine3.1253.752.732.6
Normal Saline4.554.84.332

[back to top]

Change in Problem Index (O'Leary Sant) With Preemptive Pudendal Nerve Block Compared to Saline

"To determine the change in problem index (O'Leary Sant) at baseline, 2 hours, 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months after hydrodistention with preemptive pudendal nerve block (1% Lidocaine) compared to hydrodistention with placebo (saline).~The IC problem index questionnaire consists of 4 questions on how much of a problem a patient's IC symptoms cause them. Each question has 5 answer choices ranging from 0-no problem, to 4-big problem. The numerical score for each question are added together, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 16. A higher score indicates that IC symptoms cause more problems for the patient." (NCT02517996)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 hours, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months (Up to 3 months)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline2 weeks6 weeks12 weeks
1% Lidocaine11.759.71109.6
Normal Saline9.438.67.336

[back to top]

AFI-intensity After Nociceptive Stimulation

AFI-intensity (delta F/F) at the 3rd fingertip, directly after application of grading nociceptive stimuli (NCT02537951)
Timeframe: Day 1, T=0h (AFI measurements), Day 1, T=6h (AFI measurements after lidocaine/prilocaine), Day 7 (AFI measurements after capsaicin)

Interventionunitless (Mean)
AFI Intensity in Healthy Volunteers0.60
Negative Control 1: Lidocaine/Prilocaine0.25
Negative Control 2: 8% Capsaicin0.50

[back to top]

Time to T 10 Level

Elapsed time in minutes to achieve T 10 level of anesthesia. Assessed by the anesthesia care provider using crushed ice. T 10 level is numbness up to the level of the belly button. (NCT02574832)
Timeframe: 20 minutes after drug administration

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Spinal Lidocaine Administration12.5

[back to top]

Change in Pain Assessment

Pain assessed on a visual analog scale from 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Pain score at 10 minutes post-injection is subtracted from baseline pre-injection score. Positive numbers to represent increases and negative numbers to represent decreases. (NCT02592629)
Timeframe: change from baseline assessment before injection at 10 minutes post injection

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
no Topical or Subcutaneous Anesthetic3
Subcutaneous Lidocaine4.21
Topical Ethyl Chloride5.6

[back to top]

Consumption of Piritramide

consumption of piritramide (mg) in the recovery room (NCT02616523)
Timeframe: one hour after the operation

Interventionmg (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine4.63
Lidocaine5.25
Placebo4.25

[back to top]

Consumption of Fentanyl

consumption of fentanyl (mg) during the procedure (NCT02616523)
Timeframe: time of the operation

Interventionmg (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine41
Lidocaine50
Placebo58

[back to top]

Neuropathic Pain (Pain Questionnaire) dn4

Pain questionnaire dn4 will be send to participants after two months of surgery to evaluate the neuropathic pain. There are minimum 0 points and maximum 10 points. If the score is 4 or higher then the pain is likely to be neuropathic pain. (NCT02616523)
Timeframe: two months after the surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine0.11
Lidocaine0.00
Placebo0.45

[back to top]

Lidocaine Blood Levels 30 Minutes Post Injection

Lidocaine blood levels were obtained 30 minutes post injection micro g/L The difference between injection type- 95% confidence intervals for the difference between injection types was calculated. For the outcome variable, an assessment of treatment difference by subject, calculated as 1% Buffered minus 2% Non-Buffered, was performed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests with Proc NPAR1WAY (SAS v 9.3). Statistical significance was set as P < 0.05 for all outcomes. (NCT02620683)
Timeframe: 30 minutes post injection

Interventionug/L (Mean)
buffered lidocainenon-buffered lidocaine
Buffered Lidocaine and Non-Buffered Lidocaine7.915.8

[back to top]

Number of Minutes to Anesthesia Symptoms of Lower Lip

"Patients were instructed to record the time when they experienced the initial indication of anesthesia signs in the lower lip. This was reported as the number of minutes following nerve block injection.~For the outcome variable, an assessment of treatment difference by subject, calculated as 1% Buffered minus 2% Non-Buffered was performed." (NCT02620683)
Timeframe: Patient report of anesthesia symptom onset following injection

Interventionminutes (Mean)
buffered lidocainenon-buffered lidocaine
Buffered Lidocaine and Non-Buffered Lidocaine10.213.7

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Scores

"Patients reported pain level immediately after injection of lidocaine via a Likert type scale where 1 = No Pain and 10 = Worst Pain Imaginable.~For the outcome variable, an assessment of treatment difference by subject, calculated as 1% Buffered minus 2% Non-Buffered was performed." (NCT02620683)
Timeframe: Immediately after lidocaine injection

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
buffered lidocainenon-buffered lidocaine
Buffered Lidocaine and Non-Buffered Lidocaine2.63.0

[back to top]

Pain With Coughing

Pain with coughing will be measured on post-operative day 1 at 1 pm using numerical rating scale (NSR). Subjects will rate their pain after surgery on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: post-operative day 1 at 1 pm

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group5.4
Control Group5.8

[back to top]

Overall Pain

Overall pain will be measured on post-operative day 1 at 1am using numerical rating scale (NSR). Subjects will rate their pain after surgery on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: post-operative day 1 at 1am

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group5.1
Control Group5.5

[back to top]

Pain With Coughing

Pain with coughing will be measured upon arrival at the post-operative care unit (PACU) using numerical rating scale (NSR). Subjects will rate their pain after surgery on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: baseline - arrival at the PACU

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group2.3
Control Group2.5

[back to top]

Quality of Recovery

This questionnaire is a short 15 question form that measures the quality of a subject's postoperative recovery. The scale is ranked from 0 to 10, where 0 is a poor response and 10 is an excellent response. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: Day 15 post-operatively

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Able to breathe easilyBeen able to enjoy foodFeeling restedHave had a good sleepAble to look after personal toliet and hygieneAble to communicate with family or friendsGetting support from hospital doctors and nurseAble to return to work or usual home activitiesFeeling comfortable and in controlHaving a feeling of general well-beingModerate painSevere painNausea or vomitingFeeling worried or anxiousFeeling sad or depressed
Control Group8.75.46.06.68.89.39.54.96.76.76.68.88.27.67.8
Treatment Group9.16.27.27.19.29.68.85.47.17.57.99.48.67.78.4

[back to top]

Pain at Rest

Pain at rest will be measured on post-operative day 1 at 1 am using numerical rating scale (NSR). Subjects will rate their pain after surgery on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: post-operative day 1 at 1 am

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group4.0
Control Group4.6

[back to top]

Total Opioid Consumption

Total amount of opioids converted to morphine equivalents in mg administered in the first 24 hours after surgery. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours post-operatively

Interventionmg (Mean)
Treatment Group7.4
Control Group7.9

[back to top]

Length of Time to First Bowel Movement

Time of first instance of a bowel movement will be measured as the number of days post operatively for bowel function to return. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: up to 3 weeks postoperatively

Interventiondays (Mean)
Treatment Group5.8
Control Group5.2

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption

Total opioid consumption in PACU converted to morphine equivalents in mg. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: up to 4 hours post-operatively

Interventionmg (Mean)
Treatment Group3.9
Control Group6.7

[back to top]

Overall Pain

Overall pain will be measured 30 minutes after arrival at the post-operative care unit (PACU) using numerical rating scale (NSR). Subjects will rate their pain after surgery on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after arrival to PACU

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group3.3
Control Group5.3

[back to top]

Overall Pain

Overall pain will be measured approximately 12 hours post-operatively using numerical rating scale (NSR). Subjects will rate their pain after surgery on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: approximately 12 hours post-operatively

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group4.4
Control Group5.4

[back to top]

Overall Pain

Overall pain will be measured on post-operative day 1 at 1 pm using numerical rating scale (NSR). Subjects will rate their pain after surgery on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: post-operative day 1 at 1 pm

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group4.8
Control Group4.8

[back to top]

Overall Pain in Postoperative Period

Overall pain will be measured upon arrival at the post-operative care unit (PACU) using numerical rating scale (NSR). Subjects will rate their pain after surgery on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: baseline - arrival at the PACU

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group1.6
Control Group2.7

[back to top]

Pain at Rest

Pain at rest will be measured 30 minutes after arrival at the post-operative care unit (PACU) using numerical rating scale (NSR). Subjects will rate their pain after surgery on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after arrival to PACU

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group3.3
Control Group5.1

[back to top]

Pain at Rest

Pain at rest will be measured approximately 12 hours post-operatively using numerical rating scale (NSR). Subjects will rate their pain after surgery on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: approximately 12 hours post-operatively

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group4.0
Control Group5.0

[back to top]

Pain at Rest

Pain at rest will be measured at post-operative day 1 at 1 pm using numerical rating scale (NSR). Subjects will rate their pain after surgery on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: post-operative day 1 at 1 pm

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group4.0
Control Group4.8

[back to top]

Length of Time to First Flatus

Time of first instance of flatus will be measured as the number of days post operatively for bowel function to return. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: up to 3 weeks postoperatively

Interventiondays (Mean)
Treatment Group3.9
Control Group2.7

[back to top]

Pain at Rest

Pain will be measured at rest upon arrival at the post-operative care unit (PACU) using numerical rating scale (NSR). Subjects will rate their pain after surgery on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: baseline - arrival at the PACU

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group2.1
Control Group2.6

[back to top]

Pain With Coughing

Pain with coughing will be measured 30 minutes after arrival at the post-operative care unit (PACU) using numerical rating scale (NSR). Subjects will rate their pain after surgery on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after arrival to PACU

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group4.3
Control Group5.8

[back to top]

Pain With Coughing

Pain with coughing will be measured approximately 12 hours post-operatively using numerical rating scale (NSR). Subjects will rate their pain after surgery on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: approximately 12 hours post-operatively

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group4.7
Control Group7.6

[back to top]

Pain With Coughing

Pain with coughing will be measured on post-operative day 1 at 1 am using numerical rating scale (NSR). Subjects will rate their pain after surgery on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (NCT02623803)
Timeframe: post-operative day 1 at 1 am

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group5.4
Control Group7.1

[back to top]

Left Ventricular Diameter

(NCT02669407)
Timeframe: Baseline, 30 mins

Interventioncm (Median)
Left ventricular end diastolic dimension; BaselineLeft ventricular end diastolic dimension; 30 minsLeft ventricular end systolic dimension; BaselineLeft ventricular end systolic dimension; 30 mins
Regional Nerve Anesthesia6.26.15.45.4

[back to top]

Ejection Fraction (LVEF)

(NCT02669407)
Timeframe: Baseline, 90 minutes

Interventionpercentage of ejected blood per contract (Mean)
Baseline90 minutes
Regional Nerve Anesthesia18.2719.4

[back to top]

Change in Creatinine Level

Creatinine measurements are used to evaluate renal function. Higher creatinine levels indicate less stability. (NCT02669407)
Timeframe: Baseline; 90 minutes

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
Baseline90 minutes
Regional Nerve Anesthesia2.11.9

[back to top]

Change in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)

BUN represents the major nitrogen excretion pathway and is used to evaluate renal function. Higher BUN levels indicate less stability. (NCT02669407)
Timeframe: Baseline; 90 minutes

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
Baseline90 minutes
Regional Nerve Anesthesia6153

[back to top]

Central Venous Pressure

(NCT02669407)
Timeframe: Baseline, 90 minutes

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline90 minutes
Regional Nerve Anesthesia18.7314.91

[back to top]

Cardiac Index

(NCT02669407)
Timeframe: baseline, 30 minutes

InterventionL/min/m^2 (Mean)
Baseline30 minutes
Regional Nerve Anesthesia2.172.59

[back to top]

Change in Clinical Symptoms, as Measured by 6 Minute Walk Test

The 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity. (NCT02669407)
Timeframe: Baseline, 90 minutes, 24 hours

Interventionmeters (Mean)
Baseline, 90 minutesBaseline, 24 hours
Regional Nerve Anesthesia8.724.7

[back to top]

Urine Output Measured in ml Over 3 Hours

(NCT02669407)
Timeframe: Baseline, post-procedure (0-3 hours)

Interventionml over 3 hours (Mean)
Baselinepost-procedure 0-3 hours
Regional Nerve Anesthesia138.09258.64

[back to top]

Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure

(NCT02669407)
Timeframe: baseline, 30 minutes

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline30 minutes
Regional Nerve Anesthesia3022

[back to top]

Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure

(NCT02669407)
Timeframe: Baseline, 30 minutes

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline30 minutes
Regional Nerve Anesthesia65.1853.91

[back to top]

Pulmonary Arterial Mean Pressure

(NCT02669407)
Timeframe: baseline, 30 minutes

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline30 minutes
Regional Nerve Anesthesia45.4537.64

[back to top]

N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Level

NT-proBNP level is elevated in heart failure and reflects its severity. A higher value indicates less stability. (NCT02669407)
Timeframe: Baseline; 90 minutes

Interventionpg/dL (Median)
Baseline90 minutes
Regional Nerve Anesthesia4,2972,936

[back to top]

Dyspnea as Measured on Likert Scale

The scale ranges from -3 (markedly worse) to 3 (markedly improved). 0 = no change. (NCT02669407)
Timeframe: 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90 minutes; 24 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
15 minutes7192387430 minutes7192387445 minutes7192387460 minutes7192387475 minutes7192387490 minutes7192387424 hours71923874
3=Markedly improved2=Moderately Improved1=Minimally improved0=No change-1=Minimally worse-3=Markedly worse-2=Moderately worse
Regional Nerve Anesthesia4
Regional Nerve Anesthesia3
Regional Nerve Anesthesia5
Regional Nerve Anesthesia2
Regional Nerve Anesthesia1
Regional Nerve Anesthesia0
Regional Nerve Anesthesia7

[back to top]

Patient Self-reported Pain

"Patient self report of pain using a visual analog scale (VAS). Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 0 being No pain and 10 being Most severe pain." (NCT02683707)
Timeframe: 2 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PCI Without IV Opiate2.3
PCI With IV Opiate1.5

[back to top]

Platelet Reactivity Using Light Transmission Aggregometry

Blood test of Platelet Cell Reactivity using Light Transmission Aggregometry (reported as percent of baseline aggregation in response to adenosine diphosphate stimulation) (NCT02683707)
Timeframe: Measured at 2 hours

Interventionpercentage of baseline aggregation (Mean)
PCI Without IV Opiate27.5
PCI With IV Opiate39.3

[back to top]

Single Time-point Platelet Reactivity Using Verify Now

Blood test of Platelet Cell Reactivity using Verify Now (P2Y12 Reactivity Units) (NCT02683707)
Timeframe: Measured at 2 hours

InterventionPRUs (Mean)
PCI Without IV Opiate78
PCI With IV Opiate112

[back to top]

Ticagrelor Pharmacokinetics

Area under the curve for Ticagrelor Absorption (NCT02683707)
Timeframe: Measured over 24 hours (at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours)

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
PCI Without IV Opiate3301
PCI With IV Opiate2107

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events With the Use of Restylane Silk With Lidocaine

(NCT02703948)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Restylane Silk With Lidocaine11

[back to top]

Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Mandibular Molar Anesthesia

"Subject's Mandibular first molar teeth tested before anesthetic and every 30 minutes after for response to Cold and Electric Pulp Test as reported by subjects as a yes or no." (NCT02708433)
Timeframe: Every 30 minutes up to 120 minutes total

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Buffered 1% Lidocaine, Then Non-buffered 2% Lidocaine99
Non-Buffered 2% Lidocaine, Then Buffered 1% Lidocaine98

[back to top]

Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Mandibular Canine Anesthesia

"Subject's Mandibular canine teeth will be tested before anesthetic and every 30 minutes after for response to Cold and Electronic Pulp Test for presence of anesthesia as reported by participants yes or no." (NCT02708433)
Timeframe: Every 30 minutes up to 120 minutes total

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Buffered 1% Lidocaine, Then Non-buffered 2% Lidocaine82
Non-Buffered 2% Lidocaine, Then Buffered 1% Lidocaine85

[back to top]

Intravenous Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 60 mmHg

Average concentrations of propofol infusion rates during MAP < 60 mmHg episodes (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmcg/kg/min (propofol) (Median)
Usual Care Group61.07
Hypotension Decision Support50.00

[back to top]

Intravenous Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 65 mmHg

Average concentrations of propofol infusion rates during MAP < 65 mmHg episodes (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmcg/kg/min (propofol) (Median)
Usual Care Group60.10
Hypotension Decision Support48.59

[back to top]

Postoperative Rise in Creatinine Levels

Absolute values for serum creatinine before and after surgery will be compared. When multiple postoperative creatinine measurements are made, the maximum difference is reported. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: Within 7 days after surgery

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
Usual Care Group0.00
Hypotension Decision Support0.00

[back to top]

Time to Discharge Readiness at the Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU)

The time from arriving at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) until the time the patient is considered ready for discharge (in minutes). (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: A specific time frame on the day of surgery: from the start of admission to the PACU to discharge from the PACU, an expected average of 4 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Usual Care Group67
Hypotension Decision Support60

[back to top]

Timing of Cardiovascular Drugs for MAP < 50 mmHg

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Time of first administration of cardiovascular drug relative to the time at which the mean arterial pressure (MAP) drops below 50 mmHg. Per patient the average time to first administration of all hypotensive episodes was calculated. That average time is used as the outcome variable. A negative value indicates that administration occurred before the drop in MAP. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Usual Care Group1
Hypotension Decision Support0

[back to top]

Timing of Cardiovascular Drugs for MAP < 55 mmHg

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Time of first administration of cardiovascular drug relative to the time at which the mean arterial pressure (MAP) drops below 55 mmHg. Per patient the average time to first administration of all hypotensive episodes was calculated. That average time is used as the outcome variable. A negative value indicates that administration occurred before the drop in MAP. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Usual Care Group1
Hypotension Decision Support0.5

[back to top]

Timing of Cardiovascular Drugs for MAP < 60 mmHg

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Time of first administration of cardiovascular drug relative to the time at which the mean arterial pressure (MAP) drops below 60 mmHg. Per patient the average time to first administration of all hypotensive episodes was calculated. That average time is used as the outcome variable. A negative value indicates that administration occurred before the drop in MAP. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Usual Care Group0.8
Hypotension Decision Support1.5

[back to top]

Timing of Cardiovascular Drugs for MAP < 65 mmHg

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Time of first administration of cardiovascular drug relative to the time at which the mean arterial pressure (MAP) drops below 60 mmHg. Per patient the average time to first administration of all hypotensive episodes was calculated. That average time is used as the outcome variable. A negative value indicates that administration occurred before the drop in MAP. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Usual Care Group2
Hypotension Decision Support1.14

[back to top]

Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Ephedrine

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Frequency of patients receiving the drug. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group9310
Hypotension Decision Support2718

[back to top]

Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Ephinephrine

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Frequency of patients receiving the drug. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group1215
Hypotension Decision Support409

[back to top]

Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Glycopyrrolate

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Frequency of patients receiving the drug. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group11093
Hypotension Decision Support1257

[back to top]

Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Phenylephrine

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Frequency of patients receiving the drug. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group12211
Hypotension Decision Support3685

[back to top]

Inhaled Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 50 mmHg

Average concentrations of inhalational anesthesia during MAP < 50 mmHg episodes (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

,
InterventionEndTidal% (other) (Median)
Sevoflurane (EndTidal %)Isoflurane (EndTidal %)Desflurane (EndTidal %)
Hypotension Decision Support1.230.654.70
Usual Care Group1.320.654.28

[back to top]

Inhaled Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 55 mmHg

Average concentrations of inhalational anesthesia during MAP < 55 mmHg episodes (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

,
InterventionEndTidal% (other) (Median)
Sevoflurane (EndTidal %)Isoflurane (EndTidal %)Desflurane (EndTidal %)
Hypotension Decision Support1.250.674.65
Usual Care Group1.340.684.60

[back to top]

Inhaled Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 65 mmHg

Average concentrations of inhalational anesthesia during MAP < 65 mmHg episodes (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

,
InterventionEndTidal% (other) (Median)
Sevoflurane (EndTidal %)Isoflurane (EndTidal %)Desflurane (EndTidal %)
Hypotension Decision Support1.270.682.31
Usual Care Group1.350.684.10

[back to top]

Inhaled Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 60 mmHg

Average concentrations of inhalational anesthesia during MAP < 60 mmHg episodes (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

,
InterventionEndTidal% (other) (Median)
Sevoflurane (EndTidal %)Isoflurane (EndTidal %)Desflurane (EndTidal %)
Hypotension Decision Support1.250.672.33
Usual Care Group1.350.684.36

[back to top]

30-day Mortality

Vanderbilt University Medical Center: combination of in-hospital mortality and 'alive-index' (which checks for visits to the hospital in the electronic healthcare record as indication of being alive at 30 days) (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: 30 days after surgery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group511
Hypotension Decision Support143

[back to top]

Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Ephedrine

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Average use for each drug will be calculated. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported, as the average dosages would be meaningless. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmg (Median)
Usual Care Group20
Hypotension Decision Support15

[back to top]

Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Norepinephrine

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Frequency of patients receiving the drug. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group762
Hypotension Decision Support233

[back to top]

Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Epinephrine

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Average use for each drug will be calculated. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported, as the average dosage would be meaningless. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmg (Median)
Usual Care Group1.00
Hypotension Decision Support0.70

[back to top]

Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Glycopyrrolate

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Average use for each drug will be calculated. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported, as the average dosage would be meaningless. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmg (Median)
Usual Care Group0.40
Hypotension Decision Support0.40

[back to top]

Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Norepinephrine

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Average use for each drug will be calculated. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported, as the average dosage would be meaningless. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmg (Median)
Usual Care Group0.62
Hypotension Decision Support0.70

[back to top]

Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Phenylephrine

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Average use for each drug will be calculated. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported, as the average dosage would be meaningless. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmg (Median)
Usual Care Group0.90
Hypotension Decision Support1.30

[back to top]

Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 50 mmHg

Depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension will be modeled by calculating areas under the threshold for mean arterial pressures (MAPs). Thresholds will vary from 75 mmHg to 50 mmHg in 5 mmHg decrements. Together these variables represent the depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension. To optimize goodness of fit of these variables, the decremental steps may be increased to 10 mmHg and more restrictive lowest and highest thresholds may be chosen for the statistical analysis. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionmmHg*minute (Median)
Usual Care Group19
Hypotension Decision Support19

[back to top]

Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 55 mmHg

Depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension will be modeled by calculating areas under the threshold for mean arterial pressures (MAPs). Thresholds will vary from 75 mmHg to 50 mmHg in 5 mmHg decrements. Together these variables represent the depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension. To optimize goodness of fit of these variables, the decremental steps may be increased to 10 mmHg and more restrictive lowest and highest thresholds may be chosen for the statistical analysis. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionmmHg*minute (Median)
Usual Care Group23
Hypotension Decision Support23

[back to top]

Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 60 mmHg

Depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension will be modeled by calculating areas under the threshold for mean arterial pressures (MAPs). Thresholds will vary from 75 mmHg to 50 mmHg in 5 mmHg decrements. Together these variables represent the depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension. To optimize goodness of fit of these variables, the decremental steps may be increased to 10 mmHg and more restrictive lowest and highest thresholds may be chosen for the statistical analysis. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionmmHg*minute (Median)
Usual Care Group57
Hypotension Decision Support52

[back to top]

Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 65 mmHg

Depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension will be modeled by calculating areas under the threshold for mean arterial pressures (MAPs). Thresholds will vary from 75 mmHg to 50 mmHg in 5 mmHg decrements. Together these variables represent the depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension. To optimize goodness of fit of these variables, the decremental steps may be increased to 10 mmHg and more restrictive lowest and highest thresholds may be chosen for the statistical analysis. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionmmHg*minute (Median)
Usual Care Group96
Hypotension Decision Support86

[back to top]

Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 70 mmHg

Depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension will be modeled by calculating areas under the threshold for mean arterial pressures (MAPs). Thresholds will vary from 75 mmHg to 50 mmHg in 5 mmHg decrements. Together these variables represent the depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension. To optimize goodness of fit of these variables, the decremental steps may be increased to 10 mmHg and more restrictive lowest and highest thresholds may be chosen for the statistical analysis. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionmmHg*minute (Median)
Usual Care Group273
Hypotension Decision Support235

[back to top]

Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 75 mmHg

Depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension will be modeled by calculating areas under the threshold for mean arterial pressures (MAPs). Thresholds will vary from 75 mmHg to 50 mmHg in 5 mmHg decrements. Together these variables represent the depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension. To optimize goodness of fit of these variables, the decremental steps may be increased to 10 mmHg and more restrictive lowest and highest thresholds may be chosen for the statistical analysis. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionmmHg*minute (Median)
Usual Care Group485
Hypotension Decision Support417

[back to top]

Estimated Intraoperative Blood Loss

The estimated blood loss in mL during the surgical procedure (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2 hours

InterventionmL (Median)
Usual Care Group100
Hypotension Decision Support75

[back to top]

In-hospital Mortality

Hospital mortality rate during a single hospital admission after the surgery (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: All postoperative days during a single hospital admission, expected median of 5 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group487
Hypotension Decision Support137

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 50 mmHg

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 50 mmHg during anesthesia for 1 minute or more. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group7781
Hypotension Decision Support2196

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 50 mmHg for > 10 Minutes

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 50 mmHg for a cumulative duration of all hypotensive episodes of more than 10 minutes during the anesthetic phase of the procedure. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group1159
Hypotension Decision Support326

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 50 mmHg for > 20 Minutes

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 50 mmHg for a cumulative duration of all hypotensive episodes of more than 20 minutes during the anesthetic phase of the procedure. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group304
Hypotension Decision Support85

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 55 mmHg

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 55 mmHg during anesthesia for 1 minute or more. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group10991
Hypotension Decision Support3045

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 55 mmHg for > 10 Minutes

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 55 mmHg for a cumulative duration of all hypotensive episodes of more than 10 minutes during the anesthetic phase of the procedure. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group3181
Hypotension Decision Support759

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 55 mmHg for > 20 Minutes

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 55 mmHg for a cumulative duration of all hypotensive episodes of more than 20 minutes during the anesthetic phase of the procedure. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group1223
Hypotension Decision Support284

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 60 mmHg

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 60 mmHg during anesthesia for 1 minute or more. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group13779
Hypotension Decision Support3798

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 60 mmHg for > 10 Minutes

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 60 mmHg for a cumulative duration of all hypotensive episodes of more than 10 minutes during the anesthetic phase of the procedure. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group6989
Hypotension Decision Support1723

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 60 mmHg for > 20 Minutes

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 60 mmHg for a cumulative duration of all hypotensive episodes of more than 20 minutes during the anesthetic phase of the procedure. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group3632
Hypotension Decision Support792

[back to top]

Intraoperative Administration of Intravenous Fluids

Total amount (mL) of intravenous fluids (as defined under interventions) administered during the surgical procedure. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionmL (Median)
Usual Care Group1500.00
Hypotension Decision Support1400.00

[back to top]

Intravenous Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 50 mmHg

Average concentrations of propofol infusion rates during MAP < 50 mmHg episodes (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmcg/kg/min (propofol) (Median)
Usual Care Group65.00
Hypotension Decision Support50.00

[back to top]

Intravenous Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 55 mmHg

Average concentrations of propofol infusion rates during MAP < 55 mmHg episodes (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmcg/kg/min (propofol) (Median)
Usual Care Group63.95
Hypotension Decision Support50.00

[back to top]

(IUD Insertion): Pain Perceived by Visual Analogue Scale (0-100 mm) Immediately Following Procedure Completion

"Pain immediately after speculum removal as measured by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is 0-100--on the scale 0 had no pain and 100 had worst pain imaginable as anchors. A higher score indicates higher pain." (NCT02738203)
Timeframe: 0-3 minutes after procedure completed

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Experimental, IUD Insertion Group65
Control, IUD Insertion Group59

[back to top]

Anticipated Pain as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale

"Pain as measured by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is 0-100--on the scale 0 had no pain and 100 had worst pain imaginable as anchors. A higher score indicates higher pain." (NCT02738203)
Timeframe: 30 Minutes prior to procedure

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Experimental, IUD Insertion Group60
Control, IUD Insertion Group59

[back to top]

Baseline Pain as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale

"Pain as measured by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is 0-100--on the scale 0 had no pain and 100 had worst pain imaginable as anchors. A higher score indicates higher pain." (NCT02738203)
Timeframe: Immediately prior to procedure; upon arrival to procedure room

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Experimental, IUD Insertion Group2
Control, IUD Insertion Group2

[back to top]

Pain After Speculum Placement as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale

"Pain as measured by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is 0-100--on the scale 0 had no pain and 100 had worst pain imaginable as anchors. A higher score indicates higher pain." (NCT02738203)
Timeframe: Intraoperative

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Experimental, IUD Insertion Group7
Control, IUD Insertion Group11

[back to top]

Pain After Tenaculum Placement as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale

"Pain as measured by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is 0-100--on the scale 0 had no pain and 100 had worst pain imaginable as anchors. A higher score indicates higher pain." (NCT02738203)
Timeframe: Intraoperative

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Experimental, IUD Insertion Group30
Control, IUD Insertion Group38

[back to top]

Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scores (0-10) at Rest

Subjects were asked about their overall shoulder pain during the followup phone call at 24hrs post-block. Numerical Rating Scale scores (0-10) will be recorded with 0= no pain, 10=most pain possible. Higher scores denotes worse outcome. (NCT02741713)
Timeframe: Assessed 24hrs post-block on a scale from 0-10.

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Interscalene Block Plus Sham Block6
Interscalene Plus PECS Blocks6

[back to top]

Post-operative Axillary Pain

Post-operative ambulatory surgery subjects will be asked 6 hours after block placement about the presence of axillary pain at rest. Numerical Rating Scale scores (0-10) will be recorded with 0= no pain, 10=most pain possible. Higher scores denotes worse outcome. (NCT02741713)
Timeframe: 6 hours post-block.

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Interscalene Block Plus Sham Block3
Interscalene Plus PECS Blocks0

[back to top]

Time From Block Placement to Onset of Axillary Pain

Time self-reported by patients in the Interscalene Plus PECS Blocks group during data collection phone call at 24 hours post-block. (NCT02741713)
Timeframe: Assessed 24hrs post-block in hours

InterventionHours (Mean)
Interscalene Plus PECS Blocks16.7

[back to top]

Total Opioid Usage

Recorded in oxycodone equivalents in the first 24 hours post-discharge from the PACU. (NCT02741713)
Timeframe: Assessed 24hrs post-block in mg

Interventionmg (Mean)
Interscalene Block Plus Sham Block31.6
Interscalene Plus PECS Blocks26.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Episodes of Nausea or Vomiting

Any episodes during the first 24 hours will be recorded as a yes. (NCT02741713)
Timeframe: Assessed 24hrs post-block (yes/no)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interscalene Block Plus Sham Block39
Interscalene Plus PECS Blocks37

[back to top]

Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Maxillary Molar Anesthesia

Subjects' maxillary molar teeth will be tested before anesthetic and every 30 minutes with cold and electronic pulp test for presence of anesthesia as reported by subjects yes or no. (NCT02747186)
Timeframe: Every 30 minutes up to 120 minutes Total

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Buffered 1% Lidocaine98.8
Non-Buffered 2% Lidocaine84.5

[back to top]

Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Maxillary Canine Anesthesia

Subjects' maxillary molar teeth will be tested before anesthetic and every 30 minutes with cold and electronic pulp test for presence of anesthesia as reported by subjects yes or no. (NCT02747186)
Timeframe: Every 30 minute up to 120 minutes total

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Buffered 1% Lidocaine77.1
Non-Buffered 2% Lidocaine70.9

[back to top]

Pain Control With IUD Insertion

visual analog scale (0-10) as assessed by patient within 30 minutes after IUD insertion. Scale is from a minimum of 0, with maximum of 10 with higher scores denoting more pain (NCT02769247)
Timeframe: within 30 minutes after IUD insertion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo3.606
Naproxen/Normal Saline3.088
Placebo Oral Medication/Lidocaine2.83
Naproxen/Lidocaine3.382

[back to top]

Paragard vs Mirena IUD

difference in pain ratings during IUD insertion as assessed by visual analog scale by both patient (0-10 with 10 being the most pain, 0 no pain) within 30 minutes post insertion classified by IUD type. This measure is made to address whether type of IUD affected pain perception. (NCT02769247)
Timeframe: visual analog scale as assessed by patient and physician both within 30 minutes post insertion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Mirena3.02
Paragard IUD3.49

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction With IUD

Patient satisfaction as rated on a 1-5 scale 30 days post insertion. Scale of 5 means highly satisfied, 1 means unsatisfied. (NCT02769247)
Timeframe: 30 days post insertion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo4.423
Naproxen/Normal Saline4.325
Placebo Oral Medication/Lidocaine4.264
Naproxen/Lidocaine4.358

[back to top]

Perceived Pain 30 Days Post Insertion

survey patient 30 days later to determine her recollection of pain during insertion (0-10); 10 being the most pain. One patient had no IUD initially inserted and was not included; each arm had patients lost to follow up (3 in placebo arm, 2 in naproxen arm, 4 in placebo/oral medication arm). (NCT02769247)
Timeframe: 30 days post IUD insertion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo3.12
Naproxen/Normal Saline2.97
Placebo Oral Medication/Lidocaine3.2
Naproxen/Lidocaine3.04

[back to top]

Physician Perceived Pain Control During IUD Insertion

visual analog scale (0-3) as assessed by physician within 30 minutes after IUD insertion Scale is from a minimum of 0, with maximum of 3 with higher scores denoting more pain (NCT02769247)
Timeframe: within 30 minutes after IUD insertion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo.59
Naproxen/Normal Saline.48
Placebo Oral Medication/Lidocaine.56
Naproxen/Lidocaine.77

[back to top]

Transient Neurological Symptoms Score on Post-Operative Day 7

Following a prepared questionnaire, a study team member asked about symptoms of TNS and pain that was not associated with the operation area. Participants were asked to grade the symptoms on a verbal analogue scale from 0 to 10, with zero as no discomfort and ten as unbearable discomfort. (NCT02818894)
Timeframe: Post-Operative Day 7

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine Spinal Anesthesia2.33
Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia5.75

[back to top]

Transient Neurological Symptoms Score on Post-Operative Day 14

Following a prepared questionnaire, a study team member asked about symptoms of TNS and pain that was not associated with the operation area. Participants were asked to grade the symptoms on a verbal analogue scale from 0 to 10, with zero as no discomfort and ten as unbearable discomfort. (NCT02818894)
Timeframe: Post-Operative Day 14

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine Spinal Anesthesia2.56
Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia5.67

[back to top]

Time to Ambulation After Recovery From Spinal Anesthesia

Time to ambulation after recovery from spinal anesthesia is assessed in minutes. Information about time to full ambulation was obtained by asking participants or from inpatient medical charts. (NCT02818894)
Timeframe: Day 1 (day of surgery) Post-Operation

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Lidocaine Spinal Anesthesia279.3
Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia242.0

[back to top]

Post-Operative Transient Neurological Symptoms Score on Day 1 Post-Operation

Following a prepared questionnaire, a study team member asked about symptoms of TNS and pain that was not associated with the operation area. Participants were asked to grade the symptoms on a verbal analogue scale from 0 to 10, with zero as no discomfort and ten as unbearable discomfort. (NCT02818894)
Timeframe: Day 1 (day of surgery) Post-Operation

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine Spinal Anesthesia2
Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Transient Neurological Symptoms on Post-Operative Day 7

Following a prepared questionnaire, a study team member asked about TNS and pain that was not associated with the operation area. The count of participants reporting any type of TNS is presented here. (NCT02818894)
Timeframe: Post-Operative Day 7

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lidocaine Spinal Anesthesia3
Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Transient Neurological Symptoms on Post-Operative Day 14

Following a prepared questionnaire, a study team member asked about symptoms of TNS and pain not associated with the operation area. The count of participants reporting any type of TNS is presented here. (NCT02818894)
Timeframe: Post-Operative Day 14

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lidocaine Spinal Anesthesia9
Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Transient Neurological Symptoms (TNS) on Day 1 Post-Operation

Following a prepared questionnaire, a study team member asked about TNS and pain that was not associated with the operation area. The count of participants reporting any type of TNS is presented here. (NCT02818894)
Timeframe: Day 1 (day of surgery) Post-Operation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lidocaine Spinal Anesthesia3
Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Voiding Without Complications After Recovery From Spinal Anesthesia

Urine retention after recovery from spinal anesthesia was assessed as the count of participants voiding without complications. Data were obtained through review of the inpatient records. (NCT02818894)
Timeframe: Day 1 (day of surgery) Post-Operation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lidocaine Spinal Anesthesia47
Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia47

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Hypotension

The number of participants experiencing hypotension, defined as systolic blood pressure of <90 mmHg, is presented here. Blood pressure information was obtained from reviewing the inpatient medical charts. (NCT02818894)
Timeframe: Day 1 (day of surgery) Post-Operation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lidocaine Spinal Anesthesia2
Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia1

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale Scores (Measure of Discomfort) After Catheterization

visual analog scales were performed to evaluate discomfort at specified time points during the urodynamic studies. The scale is 1-100mm, with higher numbers indicating greater discomfort. (NCT02823431)
Timeframe: duration of urodynamic study, 2 hours

Interventionmm (Mean)
Analgesia Arm26
Placebo Arm19

[back to top]

Voiding Efficiency

voided volume/{voided volume + residual volume} during micturition study during urodynamic studies (NCT02823431)
Timeframe: duration of urodynamic study, 2 hours

InterventionPercent voiding efficiency (Mean)
Analgesia Arm87
Placebo Arm90

[back to top]

Detrusor Pressure at Maximum Flow

bladder pressure reading (mmHg) during maximum flow during micturition (NCT02823431)
Timeframe: duration of urodynamic study, 2 hours

InterventioncmH2O (Mean)
Analgesia Arm37.6
Placebo Arm31

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Interrupted Urinary Flow Pattern During Micturition

presence of interrupted flow during micturition (NCT02823431)
Timeframe: duration of urodynamic study, 2 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Analgesia Arm4
Placebo Arm0

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Procedural Failure

Need to abort procedure or convert to transfemoral access (NCT02832115)
Timeframe: Intraprocedural: From procedure start to application of radial band. Approximate time 30 to 90 minutes.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Study0
Control4

[back to top]

Change in Radial Artery Dimension Measured in mm^2.

Change in Radial artery cross sectional area in mm^2 - Before application of topical nitroglycerine / placebo (Pre dilation) vs Prior to arterial puncture after application of topical nitroglycerine / placebo (Post-dilation) (NCT02832115)
Timeframe: Application of nitroglycerine / placebo until prior to arterial puncture. Approximate 60 to 120 minutes

Interventionmm^2 (Mean)
Study2.5
Control-0.2

[back to top]

Radial Artery Spasm

"Incidence of radial artery spasm indicated by a Radial artery spasm score of 1 or more. Radial artery spasm score is sum of:~Intraprocedural pain in the forearm aggravated by movement of the catheter/sheath - Absent :0; Present:1~Difficulty in manipulating the catheter- Absence :0; Present:1~Difficulty with sheath removal: Absent: 0; Present:1~Additional use of intraarterial nitroglycerine or verapamil after the initial vasodilator cocktail- No:0; Yes:1" (NCT02832115)
Timeframe: Intraprocedural: From procedure start to application of radial band. Approximate time 30 to 90 minutes.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Study8
Control15

[back to top]

Patient Discomfort or Pain During Procedure (Visual Analog Scale 0-10)

Patient discomfort or pain during procedure measured using Visual analog scale 0-10, 0 being no discomfort or pain (best) and 10 being worst discomfort or pain (worst) (NCT02832115)
Timeframe: Intraprocedural: From procedure start to application of radial band. Approximate time 30 to 90 minutes.

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Study0.792
Control0.875

[back to top]

Radial Pulse at End of Procedure

Radial pulse at end of procedure 0- 4+, 0 indicating no palpable pulse (worst); 1 + indicating a faint, but detectable pulse; 2 + suggesting a slightly more diminished pulse than normal; 3 + is a normal pulse; and 4 + indicating a bounding pulse (best). (NCT02832115)
Timeframe: At the end of transradial cardiac catheterization after sheath removal

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Study2.208333333
Control2.166666667

[back to top]

Hospital Length of Stay.

During the hospitalization following surgery until discharge. Hospital length of stay ranged from 3 - 22 days following surgery. (NCT02849678)
Timeframe: During the inpatient hospitalization (Hospital length of stay ranged from 3 - 22 days following surgery)

Interventiondays (Median)
Lidocaine5
Ropivacaine5

[back to top]

Time to First Flatus/Defecation

During the hospitalization following surgery until discharge. Hospital length of stay ranged from 3 - 22 days following surgery. (NCT02849678)
Timeframe: During the inpatient hospitalization (Hospital length of stay ranged from 3 - 22 days following surgery)

InterventionPostoperative days (Median)
Lidocaine2
Ropivacaine2

[back to top]

Consumption of Nerve Block Boluses Will Also be Recorded Daily

During the hospitalization following surgery until discontinuation of the block or discharge. Hospital length of stay ranged from 3 - 22 days following surgery. (NCT02849678)
Timeframe: During the inpatient hospitalization (Hospital length of stay ranged from 3 - 22 days following surgery)

,
Interventionmilliliters (Median)
Nerve block boluses PACUNerve block boluses 24HRSNerve block boluses 48HRS
Lidocaine2000
Ropivacaine2000

[back to top]

Time to First Ambulation(Walking Greater Than 15 Feet)

During the hospitalization following surgery until discharge. Hospital length of stay ranged from 3 - 22 days following surgery. (NCT02849678)
Timeframe: During the inpatient hospitalization (Hospital length of stay ranged from 3 - 22 days following surgery)

Interventiondays (Median)
Lidocaine2
Ropivacaine1

[back to top]

11-point Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Assessment

The primary outcome of the study is the NRS score for pain at rest at 24 hours. The NRS Pain Assessment requires patients to select a number between 0 - 10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst imaginable pain. Patients pick one whole number on this scale to describe their pain. (NCT02849678)
Timeframe: 24 hours from the end of surgery

InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Lidocaine3
Ropivacaine3

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Complications (Including But Not Limited to Pneumonia, Atelectasis, Hypotension, Motor Weakness, Etc.)

During the hospitalization following surgery until discharge. (NCT02849678)
Timeframe: During the inpatient hospitalization (Hospital length of stay ranged from 3 - 22 days following surgery)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hypotension (Patient 19)Deydration with Acute Renal Failure (Patient 7)Small Bowel Obstruction (Patients 43, 24, 34)Rectal Bleeding (Patient 23)Anastamotic Dehiscence with Pelvic Abscess -Pt. 34Tremors After Anesthetic Boli (Patient 34)
Lidocaine111000
Ropivacaine002111

[back to top]

Postoperative Opioid Consumption (Milligrams of Dilaudid or Equivalent)

During the hospitalization following surgery until discharge. Hospital length of stay ranged from 3 - 22 days following surgery. (NCT02849678)
Timeframe: During the inpatient hospitalization (Hospital length of stay ranged from 3 - 22 days following surgery)

,
InterventionMilligrams (Mean)
Hydromorphone PACUHydromorphone 24HRSHydromorphone 48HRS
Lidocaine1.69.216.1
Ropivacaine1.15.79.6

[back to top]

Anticipated Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale

Measured by visual analogue scale (VAS), 0-100, Pain was measured on a 100 mm VAS scale. Lower scores correspond to less pain, higher scores correspond to more pain. (NCT02852434)
Timeframe: Preoperative; 30 minutes prior to procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Self-administered Gel47.2
Paracervical Block58.7

[back to top]

Overall Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale

Measured by visual analogue scale (VAS), 0-100; Pain was measured on a 100 mm VAS scale. Lower scores correspond to less pain, higher scores correspond to more pain. (NCT02852434)
Timeframe: Postoperative; Assessed once 10 minutes after procedure

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Overall PainOverall ExperienceProvider Reported Ease of Insertion
Paracervical Block51.762.421
Self-administered Gel45.465.227

[back to top]

Speculum Placement Measured by Visual Analogue Scale

Measured by visual analogue scale (VAS), 0-100; Pain was measured on a 100 mm VAS scale. Lower scores correspond to less pain, higher scores correspond to more pain. (NCT02852434)
Timeframe: Intraoperative; Immediately following speculum placement

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Self-administered Gel24.7
Paracervical Block31.2

[back to top]

Pain Perceived at the Time of Laminaria or Osmotic Dilator Insertion

Measured by visual analogue scale (VAS), 0-100; Pain was measured on a 100 mm VAS scale. Lower scores correspond to less pain, higher scores correspond to more pain. (NCT02852434)
Timeframe: Intraoperative; Immediately (0-30 seconds) following cervical dilation

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Self-administered Gel48.4
Paracervical Block56.3

[back to top]

Baseline Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale

Measured by visual analogue scale (VAS), 0-100, Pain was measured on a 100 mm VAS scale. Lower scores correspond to less pain, higher scores correspond to more pain. (NCT02852434)
Timeframe: Immediately prior to procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Self-administered Gel2.6
Paracervical Block6.6

[back to top]

Subjective Injection Pain

Immediately after receiving the intravitreal injection, patient's will be asked to rate their pain on the Visual Analogue (Pain) Scale. The scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 meaning no pain and 10 meaning the worst possible pain. (NCT02872012)
Timeframe: Immediately following the intravitreal injection

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cryoanesthesia Device -5 Degrees Celsius for 10 Seconds7.0
Cyroanesthesia Device -5 Degrees Celsius for 20 Seconds3.1
Cryoanesthesia Device -7 Degrees Celsius for 20 Seconds3.0
Cryoanesthesia Device -10 Degrees Celsius for 10 Seconds1.8
Cryoanesthesia Device -10 Degrees Celsius for 20 Seconds2.4
Standard of Care: Lidocaine2.3

[back to top]

Pain Score at 30 Minutes

The trial will compare the patient's pain score on a 11 point Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain, 5 moderate pain and 10 very severe pain, at 30 minutes (NCT02902770)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine and Normal Saline Push5.52
Ketorolac and Normal Saline Drip3.88
Lidocaine and Ketorolac3.14

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Any Improvement on Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) From Baseline in Both Hands at Month 3 After Initial Treatment

The GAIS is a 7-point scale. The 7-point scale are as follow: +3 (very much improved), +2 (much improve), +1 (improved), 0 (no change), -1 (worse), -2 (much worse), and -3 (very much worse). (NCT02904096)
Timeframe: Month 3

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group115
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group118

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Range of Motion (ROM) Flexion and Extension (Angle) for Metacarpophalangeal Joints in Each Hand at Month 24

The ROM was assessed using a Jamar finger goniometer. This test passively and actively measured the angle of motion of all five metacarpophalangeal joints in each hand right and left by determining the flexion and extension angles. The flexion determined how far each finger could be flexed at the metacarpophalangeal joint toward the palm. The extension determined how each finger could be extended at the metacarpophalangeal joint away from the palm. Degree scale ranges from 0 to 180 degree. Lower values in flexion angle and extension angle means more deterioration in hand function. (NCT02904096)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 24

,
Interventiondegrees (Mean)
Change at Month 24, Flexion: Left HandChange at Month 24, Flexion: Right HandChange at Month 24, Extension: Left HandChange at Month 24, Extension: Right Hand
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group4.104.201.832.88
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group2.073.17-0.320.72

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sensation to Filament Size Between Metacarpals in Each Hand at Month 24

Sensation in the dorsum of each hand was conducted using a Semmes-Weinstein monofilament touch test. This was assessed using an index finger touch protocol, where by study subject was asked to report when a 2 to 3 centimeter (cm) light touch is felt at 3 different areas of the dorsum of each hand. Sensation results were coded for analysis such as response to 2.83 filament = 1, response to 3.61 filament = 2, response to 4.31 filament = 3, response to 4.56 filament = 4, response to 6.65 filament = 5, and no response to either filament = 6. For sensation testing a value of 1 (response to 2.83 filament) is considered normal while a value of 2 (response to 3.61) would show diminished light touch. Score ranges from 1 to 6. A higher value in sensation measurements is associated with a deterioration in hand function. (NCT02904096)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 24

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Change at Month 24: Left HandChange at Month 24: Right Hand
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group-0.52-0.49
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group-0.44-0.52

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grip Strength, Tip Pinch Strength, Key Pinch Strength, and Palmar Strength in Each Hand at Month 24

Hand strength was assessed in two ways grip and pinch strengths. Grip strength was assessed using a standard, adjustable-handle Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer. Pinch strength was assessed in three different ways such as tip (two-point) pinch, key (lateral) pinch, and palmar (three-jaw chuck) pinch using the Jamar hydraulic pinch gauge. Lower values (pounds) in hand grip and pinch strength are associated with deterioration in function. (NCT02904096)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 24

,
Interventionpounds (Mean)
Change at Month 24, Grip Strength: Left HandChange at Month 24, Grip Strength: Right HandChange at Month 24, Tip Pinch Strength: Left HandChange at Month 24, Tip Pinch Strength: Right HandChange at Month 24, Key Pinch Strength: Left HandChange at Month 24, Key Pinch Strength: Right HandChange at Month 24,Palmar Pinch Strength:Left HandChange at Month 24,PalmarPinch Strength:Right Hand
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group-3.63-2.281.261.600.901.330.680.54
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group-4.65-3.371.701.461.121.260.430.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Functional Dexterity in Each Hand at Month 24

The functional dexterity test (FDT) assessed the fine motor skills (dexterity) that means it assessed the subject's ability to use the hand for daily tasks requiring the 3-jaw chunk prehensions that is buttoning, tying shoelaces, screwing a nut and bolt, and lacing yarn using a 16-hole peg board. Functional Dexterity was measured by noting the time in seconds on stopwatch for a hand to invert pegs on a 16-hole pegboard and this test assessed the ability to use hand for daily tasks. Longer times to complete the functional dexterity test means deterioration in hand function. (NCT02904096)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 24

,
Interventionseconds (Mean)
Change at Month 24: Left HandChange at Month 24: Right Hand
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group-6.29-4.53
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group-3.76-3.89

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Subjects With MHGS Scores Greater Than or Equal (>=) to 1-point Improvement From Baseline in Both Hands at Month 3 After Initial Treatment

The MHGS was used to measure clinical effectiveness of the Radiesse hand treatments by a masked evaluator performing live, dorsal hand assessments. The MHGS was an ordinal scale; therefore, ratings were made at a single, live rating at a specific study time point. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect was demonstrated by a decrease in MHGS score. MHGS had 5 categories, where: 0 (no loss of fatty tissue); 1 (mild loss of fatty tissue; slight visibility of veins); 2 (moderate loss of fatty tissue; mild visibility of veins and tendons); 3 (severe loss of fatty tissue; moderate visibility of veins and tendons); 4(very severe loss of fatty tissue; marked visibility of veins and tendons). (NCT02904096)
Timeframe: Month 3

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group117
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group104

[back to top]

Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale

"The order of overall events are: insertion of speculum, assessment of pain via a visual analogue scale (VAS) (about 30 seconds after insertion of the speculum), injection of 2cc 1% lidocaine at the tenaculum site of the cervix, placement of tenaculum (about 2-3 minutes after insertion of speculum), assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the tenaculum), injection of 3cc 1% lidocaine at the 4 and 8 o'clock position of the cervix, insert IUD (about 4-5 minutes after insertion of tenaculum), and assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the IUD).~The Faces pain VAS was used, which ranges from 0 (very happy, no hurt) to 10 (hurts as much as you can imagine)." (NCT02904915)
Timeframe: about 30 seconds after insertion of the IUD (IUD inserted about 4 to 5 minutes after insertion of tenaculum)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paracervical Block2.6
No Analgesia3.6

[back to top]

Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale

"The order of overall events are: insertion of speculum, assessment of pain via a visual analogue scale (VAS) (about 30 seconds after insertion of the speculum), injection of 2cc 1% lidocaine at the tenaculum site of the cervix, placement of tenaculum (about 2-3 minutes after insertion of speculum), assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the tenaculum), injection of 3cc 1% lidocaine at the 4 and 8 o'clock position of the cervix, insert IUD (about 4-5 minutes after insertion of tenaculum), and assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the IUD).~The Faces pain VAS was used, which ranges from 0 (very happy, no hurt) to 10 (hurts as much as you can imagine)." (NCT02904915)
Timeframe: about 30 seconds after insertion of the tenaculum (tenaculum inserted about 2 to 3 minutes after insertion of speculum)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paracervical Block2.1
No Analgesia2.7

[back to top]

Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

"The order of overall events are: insertion of speculum, assessment of pain via a visual analogue scale (VAS) (about 30 seconds after insertion of the speculum), injection of 2cc 1% lidocaine at the tenaculum site of the cervix, placement of tenaculum (about 2-3 minutes after insertion of speculum), assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the tenaculum), injection of 3cc 1% lidocaine at the 4 and 8 o'clock position of the cervix, insert IUD (about 4-5 minutes after insertion of tenaculum), and assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the IUD).~The Faces pain VAS was used, which ranges from 0 (very happy, no hurt) to 10 (hurts as much as you can imagine)." (NCT02904915)
Timeframe: baseline (about 30 seconds after insertion of the speculum)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paracervical Block2.4
No Analgesia2.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients in Each Arm That Required Use of an Iris Expansion Device During the Procedure

(NCT02909140)
Timeframe: intraoperative

Interventionpercent (Number)
Intracameral Mydriasis50

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients in Each Arm That Required Another Mydriatic Agent

(NCT02909140)
Timeframe: intraoperative

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Intracameral Mydriasis0

[back to top]

Cumulative Energy Dispersed for Each Arm

The amount of energy needed to break up the cataractous lens (NCT02909140)
Timeframe: During cataract surgery

InterventionPercent-seconds (Number)
Intracameral Mydriasis6.6

[back to top]

Mean Time Taken to Perform Phacoemulsification

(NCT02909140)
Timeframe: During cataract surgery

Interventionseconds (Number)
Intracameral Mydriasis76

[back to top]

Pupil Size Immediately Prior to Capsulorrhexis

Pupil size immediately prior to the capsulorrhexis step of cataract surgery. This will be recorded by digital photography and measured by a researcher who is masked to the intervention. (NCT02909140)
Timeframe: Immediately prior to the capsulorrhexis step of cataract surgery

Interventionmm (Number)
Intracameral Mydriasis8

[back to top]

Pupil Size (mm) Immediately After Nuclear Disassembly

Pupil size immediately after breaking up of cataractous lens (NCT02909140)
Timeframe: Immediately after nuclear disassembly step of cataract surgery

Interventionmm (Number)
Intracameral Mydriasis8

[back to top]

Pupil Size Immediately Prior to Intraocular Lens (IOL) Insertion

Pupil size after insertion of IOL lens (NCT02909140)
Timeframe: Immediately prior to IOL insertion step of cataract surgery

Interventionmm (Number)
Intracameral Mydriasis8

[back to top]

Pupil Size Upon Completion of Surgery

(NCT02909140)
Timeframe: intraoperative

Interventionmm (Number)
Intracameral Mydriasis7

[back to top]

Mean Time Taken to Perform Phacoemulsification in Each Arm

(NCT02909140)
Timeframe: intraoperative

Interventionseconds (Number)
Intracameral Mydriasis76

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction

"The proportion of patients saying, Yes to Would you have this pain medication again for similar pain?" (NCT02912195)
Timeframe: 60 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intravenous Lidocaine13
Morphine14

[back to top]

Pain Score (NRS 0-10)

Pain score recorded on the numeric rating scale 0-10. 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst pain. (NCT02912195)
Timeframe: At 20 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intravenous Lidocaine7.4
Morphine6.2

[back to top]

Pain Score (NRS 0-10)

Pain score recorded on the numeric rating scale 0-10. (NCT02912195)
Timeframe: At 50 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intravenous Lidocaine5.6
Morphine4.6

[back to top]

Pain Score (NRS 0-10)

Pain score recorded on the numeric rating scale 0-10. (NCT02912195)
Timeframe: At 40 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intravenous Lidocaine6.3
Morphine4.7

[back to top]

Pain Score (NRS 0-10)

Pain score recorded on the numeric rating scale 0-10. (NCT02912195)
Timeframe: At 10 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intravenous Lidocaine8.1
Morphine8.9

[back to top]

Pain Score (NRS 0-10)

Pain score recorded on the numeric rating scale 0-10. (NCT02912195)
Timeframe: At 30 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intravenous Lidocaine7.0
Morphine5.6

[back to top]

Pain Relief at 60 Minutes Compared to Baseline.

Pain numeric rating scale (NRS) at 0 minutes minus pain NRS at 60 minutes. NRS is a scale ranging from 0, no pain, to 10 worst pain. (NCT02912195)
Timeframe: At 60 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intravenous Lidocaine4.1
Morphine4.8

[back to top]

Pain Relief at 50 Minutes Compared to Baseline.

Pain numeric rating scale (NRS) at 0 minutes minus pain NRS at 50 minutes. NRS is a scale ranging from 0, no pain, to 10 worst pain. (NCT02912195)
Timeframe: At 50 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intravenous Lidocaine3.6
Morphine4.4

[back to top]

Pain Score (NRS 0-10)

Pain score is rated on the Numeric Rating Scale from 0-10. 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain. (NCT02912195)
Timeframe: At 60 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intravenous Lidocaine5.1
Morphine4.2

[back to top]

Pain Relief at 40 Minutes Compared to Baseline.

Pain numeric rating scale (NRS) at 0 minutes minus pain NRS at 40 minutes. NRS is a scale ranging from 0, no pain, to 10 worst pain. (NCT02912195)
Timeframe: At 40 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intravenous Lidocaine2.9
Morphine4.2

[back to top]

Pain Relief at 30 Minutes Compared to Baseline.

Pain numeric rating scale (NRS) at 0 minutes minus pain NRS at 30 minutes NRS is a scale ranging from 0, no pain, to 10 worst pain. (NCT02912195)
Timeframe: at 30 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intravenous Lidocaine2.2
Morphine3.4

[back to top]

Pain Relief at 20 Minutes Compared to Baseline.

Pain numeric rating scale (NRS) at 0 minutes minus pain NRS at 20 minutes. NRS is a scale ranging from 0, no pain, to 10 worst pain. (NCT02912195)
Timeframe: at 20 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intravenous Lidocaine1.8
Morphine2.8

[back to top]

Pain Relief at 10 Minutes Compared to Baseline.

Pain NRS at 0 minutes minus pain NRS at 10 minutes (NCT02912195)
Timeframe: At 10 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intravenous Lidocaine1.1
Morphine2.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Requiring Rescue Medications

The percentage of patients requiring rescue IV morphine at 20 and 40 minutes (NCT02912195)
Timeframe: At 20 and 40 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intravenous Lidocaine5
Morphine4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events

Participants will be observed for the following adverse events and side effects: seizure, bradyarrhythmias, hyper or hypotension, perioral numbness, tinnitus, metallic taste, other, hypotension, hypoxia, nausea, vomiting, itching, or other side effects. Participants have the opportunity to report other side effects during the study (NCT02912195)
Timeframe: 0-60 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intravenous Lidocaine2
Morphine6

[back to top]

Treatment Differences in Pain (Restylane Side - Restylane Lidocaine Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

"Subjects that reported at least 10 mm less VAS pain associated with injections of Restylane-Lido compared to Restylane at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after injection. VAS=Visual Analogue Scale. The VAS is a subjective scale to measure pain intensity. The participant is instructed to put a vertical mark, approximating the pain experienced during the procedure, on a 100 mm (millimeter) horizontal line labelled no pain at the left end and the worst pain you can imagine at the rig" (NCT02918721)
Timeframe: 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after injection

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
after 15 minutesafter 30 minutesafter 45 minutesafter 60 minutes
All Study Participants55.748.635.731.4

[back to top]

Treatment Difference in Pain (Restylane Lidocaine Side - Restylane Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)

"Subjects that reported at least 10 mm less VAS pain associated with injections of Restylane-Lido compared to Restylane at the time of injection.~VAS=Visual Analogue Scale. The VAS is a subjective scale to measure pain intensity. The participant is instructed to put a vertical mark, approximating the pain experienced during the procedure, on a 100 mm (millimeter) horizontal line labelled no pain at the left end and the worst pain you can imagine at the right end. The distance in mm from the left end (no pain) to the participant's VAS mark is measured with a standard ruler." (NCT02918721)
Timeframe: Up to 60 minutes after Injection on Day of Treatment

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
All Study Participants77.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With X-ray of Either Hand With Bone Obscuration at Month 24

Obscuration was defined as any post-treatment hand x-ray that at least 1 of the 2 blinded radiologist interpreted as Radiesse obscuring bones. (NCT02949921)
Timeframe: Month 24

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With X-ray of Either Hand With Bone Obscuration at Month 1

Obscuration was defined as any post-treatment hand x-ray that at least 1 of the 2 blinded radiologist interpreted as Radiesse obscuring bones. (NCT02949921)
Timeframe: Month 1

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group0

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With GAIS Scores Following Retreatment at Months 7 and 12

The GAIS is a 7-point scale. The 7-point scale are as follows: +3 (very much improved); +2 (much improved); +1 (improved); 0 (no change); -1 (worse); -2 (much worse); -3 (very much worse). (NCT02949921)
Timeframe: Months 7 and 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 7: Left hand (very much improved)Month 7: Right hand (very much improved)Month 7: Left hand (much improved)Month 7: Right hand (much improved)Month 7: Left hand (improved)Month 7: Right hand (improved)Month 7: Left hand (no change)Month 7: Right hand (no change)Month 7: Left hand (worse)Month 7: Right hand (worse)Month 7: Left hand (much worse)Month 7: Right hand (much worse)Month 7: Left hand (very much worse)Month 7: Right hand (very much worse)Month 12: Left hand (very much improved)Month 12: Right hand (very much improved)Month 12: Left hand (much improved)Month 12: Right hand (much improved)Month 12: Left hand (improved)Month 12: Right hand (improved)Month 12: Left hand (no change)Month 12: Right hand (no change)Month 12: Left hand (worse)Month 12: Right hand (worse)Month 12: Left hand (much worse)Month 12: Right hand (much worse)Month 12: Left hand (very much worse)Month 12: Right hand (very much worse)
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group57.157.128.628.614.314.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.028.628.614.314.342.942.914.314.30.00.00.00.00.00.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group75.075.00.00.025.025.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.025.025.050.050.00.00.025.025.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Scores After Initial Treatment at Months 1 and 6

The GAIS is a 7-point scale. The 7-point scale are as follows: +3 (very much improved); +2 (much improved); +1 (improved); 0 (no change); -1 (worse); -2 (much worse); -3 (very much worse). (NCT02949921)
Timeframe: Months 1 and 6

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 1: Left hand (very much improved)Month 1: Right hand (very much improved)Month 1: Left hand (much improved)Month 1: Right hand (much improved)Month 1: Left hand (improved)Month 1: Right hand (improved)Month 1: Left hand (no change)Month 1: Right hand (no change)Month 1: Left hand (worse)Month 1: Right hand (worse)Month 1: Left hand (much worse)Month 1: Right hand (much worse)Month 1: Left hand (very much worse)Month 1: Right hand (very much worse)Month 6: Left hand (very much improved)Month 6: Right hand (very much improved)Month 6: Left hand (much improved)Month 6: Right hand (much improved)Month 6: Left hand (improved)Month 6: Right hand (improved)Month 6: Left hand (no change)Month 6: Right hand (no change)Month 6: Left hand (worse)Month 6: Right hand (worse)Month 6: Left hand (much worse)Month 6: Right hand (much worse)Month 6: Left hand (very much worse)Month 6: Right hand (very much worse)
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group60.060.010.010.030.030.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.020.020.020.020.050.050.010.010.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group60.060.040.040.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.030.030.020.020.040.040.010.010.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 1 Point Improvement on the MHGS in Both Hands After Initial Treatment at Months 1 and 6

"The MHGS was used to measure clinical efficacy of the Radiesse hand treatments by a masked evaluator performing live, dorsal hand assessments. The MHGS was an ordinal scale; therefore, ratings were made based on a snap-shot at a specific study time point. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect was demonstrated by a decrease in MHGS score. MHGS had 5 categories, where: 0 (no loss of fatty tissue); 1 (mild loss of fatty tissue; slight visibility of veins); 2 (moderate loss of fatty tissue; mild visibility of veins and tendons); 3 (severe loss of fatty tissue; moderate visibility of veins and tendons); 4(very severe loss of fatty tissue; marked visibility of veins and tendons)." (NCT02949921)
Timeframe: Months 1 and 6

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 1Month 6
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group108
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group109

[back to top]

Number of Participants With >=1 Point Improvement on the MHGS in Both Hands Following Retreatment at Months 7 and 12

"The MHGS was used to measure clinical efficacy of the Radiesse hand treatments by a masked evaluator performing live, dorsal hand assessments. The MHGS was an ordinal scale; therefore, ratings were made based on a snap-shot at a specific study time point. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect was demonstrated by a decrease in MHGS score. MHGS had 5 categories, where: 0 (no loss of fatty tissue); 1 (mild loss of fatty tissue; slight visibility of veins); 2 (moderate loss of fatty tissue; mild visibility of veins and tendons); 3 (severe loss of fatty tissue; moderate visibility of veins and tendons); 4(very severe loss of fatty tissue; marked visibility of veins and tendons)." (NCT02949921)
Timeframe: Months 7 and 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 7Month 12
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group75
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group43

[back to top]

Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) Scores

The MHQ is a hand-specific outcomes instrument that measures outcomes of participants with conditions of, or injury to, the hand or wrist. The MHQ contains six domains: overall hand function, activities of daily living, work performance, pain, aesthetics and satisfaction. For this study, MHQ overall hand function and MHQ pain domains were evaluated. Scores for both scales range from 0-100. Higher MHQ hand function scores denote better hand performance whereas higher MHQ pain scores denote more pain. MHQ minimal clinically important differences were defined as score changes greater than an 11-point increase for the pain domain and greater than a 13-point decrease for the function domain. (NCT02949921)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 6, 7, 12, 13, 18, 19 and 24

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline: Left Hand (Function)Baseline: Left Hand (Pain)Baseline: Right Hand (Function)Baseline: Right Hand (Pain)Month 1: Left Hand (Function)Month 1: Left Hand (Pain)Month 1: Right Hand (Function)Month 1: Right Hand (Pain)Month 6: Left Hand (Function)Month 6: Left Hand (Pain)Month 6: Right Hand (Function)Month 6: Right Hand (Pain)Month 7: Left Hand (Function)Month 7: Left Hand (Pain)Month 7: Right Hand (Function)Month 7: Right Hand (Pain)Month 12: Left Hand (Function)Month 12: Left Hand (Pain)Month 12: Right Hand (Function)Month 12: Right Hand (Pain)Month 13: Left Hand (Function)Month 13: Left Hand (Pain)Month 13: Right Hand (Function)Month 13: Right Hand (Pain)Month 18: Left Hand (Function)Month 18: Left Hand (Pain)Month 18: Right Hand (Function)Month 18: Right Hand (Pain)Month 19: Left Hand (Function)Month 19: Left Hand (Pain)Month 19: Right Hand (Function)Month 19: Right Hand (Pain)Month 24: Left Hand (Function)Month 24: Left Hand (Pain)Month 24: Right Hand (Function)Month 24: Right Hand (Pain)
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group96.52.099.01.099.54.599.52.098.50.5100.00.099.30.0100.00.099.00.5100.00.099.40.6100.00.099.50.5100.00.099.30.0100.00.099.50.0100.01.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group94.04.096.53.598.54.597.54.5100.00.0100.00.0100.00.0100.00.098.01.598.04.5100.00.0100.00.0100.00.0100.00.0100.00.0100.00.0100.00.0100.00.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With X-ray of Either Hand With Bone Obscuration at Month 6

Obscuration was defined as any post-treatment hand x-ray that at least 1 of the 2 blinded radiologist interpreted as Radiesse obscuring bones. (NCT02949921)
Timeframe: Month 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Roughness (Ra) of the Radial Cheek Lines at Maximum Smile as Assessed by DERMATOP®

The DERMATOP® is a fringe projection system used to measure wrinkles. The system collects 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) images and then calculates the roughness, texture, and amplitude of wrinkles. To ensure that repeat measurements are made in the same area, the angles of the camera were recorded, and a red positioning laser was used to mark the edge of the chin. In addition, a 2D picture of the baseline measurements was taken by the machine to position subsequent measurements. Measurements are presented in micrometers (μm). A negative change from Baseline (pre-treatment) indicates that the roughness of wrinkles decreased. (NCT02980783)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 45

Interventionμm (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)Change from Baseline at Day 45
Juvéderm® VOLIFT®™ With Lidocaine96.6-24.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants by Self-Perceived Age Category as Assessed by the Self-Perception of Age (SPA) Questionnaire

"The SPA questionnaire consists of one question: How do you think your facial appearance looks compared to your age TODAY? Participants could choose one of three possible answers: I look my current age, I look younger, or I look older. The percentage of participants in the following SPA categories is reported: I look my current age, I look younger and I look older." (NCT02980783)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 45

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline (Day) 1: I look my current ageBaseline (Day) 1: I look youngerBaseline (Day) 1: I look olderDay 45: I look my current ageDay 45: I look youngerDay 45: I look older
Juvéderm® VOLIFT®™ With Lidocaine53281938602

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants by Improvement Rating (Response) of the Participants' Dynamic Radial Cheek Lines as Assessed by the Investigator Using the GAIS

The investigator graded the improvement of the participant's dynamic radial cheek lines on both sides of their face using the 5-point GAIS where -2=much worse to +2=much improved. Responders are participants with a score of +1 or +2 (improved or much improved, respectively) on both sides; partial responder are participants with a score of +1 or +2 on only one side; and no-responders are participants with a score lower or equal to 0 on both sides. The percentages of responders, partial responders, and no-responders are reported. (NCT02980783)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 45

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ResponderPartial ResponderNo Responder
Juvéderm® VOLIFT®™ With Lidocaine94.21.93.8

[back to top]

Mean Score for the Level of Naturalness of the Appearance of Participants' Dynamic Radial Cheek Lines as Assessed by a Participant Questionnaire

"Participants were asked to indicate their level agreement with the following statement: The treatment of my smile lines gave me a natural look. Responses were scored from 0 to 10, where 0=not at all to 10=very much." (NCT02980783)
Timeframe: Day 45

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Juvéderm® VOLIFT®™ With Lidocaine7.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Texture (Rz) of the Radial Cheek Lines at Maximum Smile as Assessed by DERMATOP®

The DERMATOP® is a fringe projection system used to measure wrinkles. The system collects 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) images and then calculates the roughness, texture, and amplitude of wrinkles. To ensure that repeat measurements are made in the same area, the angles of the camera were recorded, and a red positioning laser was used to mark the edge of the chin. In addition, a 2D picture of the baseline measurements was taken by the machine to position subsequent measurements. Measurements are presented in micrometers. A negative change from Baseline (pre-treatment) indicates that the texture of wrinkles improved. (NCT02980783)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 45

Interventionμm (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)Change from Baseline at Day 45
Juvéderm® VOLIFT®™ With Lidocaine203.1-35.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants by Improvement Rating (Improved and Not Improved) of Their Dynamic Radial Cheek Lines as Assessed by the Participant Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)

Participants graded the improvement of their dynamic radial cheek lines using the GAIS 5-point scale where -2=much worse to +2=much improved. Participants who rated their improvement as -2, -1, or 0 (much worse, worse, or no change, respectively) were grouped as Not Improved and those who rated their improvement as +1 or +2 (improved or much improved, respectively) were grouped as Improved. The percentages of participants who rated their cheek lines as Improved and Not Improved are reported. (NCT02980783)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 45

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ImprovedNot Improved
Juvéderm® VOLIFT®™ With Lidocaine98.11.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Amplitude (Rt) of the Radial Cheek Lines at Maximum Smile as Assessed by DERMATOP®

The DERMATOP® is a fringe projection system used to measure wrinkles. The system collects 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) images and then calculates the roughness, texture, and amplitude of wrinkles. To ensure that repeat measurements are made in the same area, the angles of the camera were recorded, and a red positioning laser was used to mark the edge of the chin. In addition, a 2D picture of the baseline measurements was taken by the machine to position subsequent measurements. Measurements are presented in micrometers. A negative change from Baseline (pre-treatment) indicates that the amplitude of wrinkles decreased. (NCT02980783)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 45

Interventionμm (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)Change from Baseline at Day 45
Juvéderm® VOLIFT®™ With Lidocaine511.8-115.1

[back to top]

Patients Satisfaction

Patient's satisfaction was recorded using a score ranging from 0 for not satisfied to 10 for totally satisfied. (NCT02988050)
Timeframe: 1 hour after the operation

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Conscious sedation16.33
Conscious sedation26.45

[back to top]

Patient Global Aesthetic Improvement

Patient Global Aesthetic Improvement Score is a 5-point scale used to assess the subject's satisfaction with the visual appearance of their NLF correction after treatment. 1 = Worse (worst outcome), 2 = No Change, 3 = Improved, 4 = Much Improved, 5 = Very Much improved (best outcome). The higher scores mean a better outcome. (NCT02991040)
Timeframe: Visit 2/Day 14 (± 2 days), Visit 3/Day 28 (± 2 days), Visit 4/Day 84 (± 4 days), Visit 5/Day 168 (Week 24) (± 7 days)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 2/Week 2Visit 3/Week 4Visit 4/Week 12Visit 5/Week 24
Revanesse Ultra+0.04-0.10-0.070.00

[back to top]

Wrinkle Severity Rating Score (WSRS)

The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale is a 5-point scale with 1 = Absent; 2 = Mild; 3 = Moderate; 4 = Severe and 5 = Extreme. 1 is the best outcome while 5 is the worst outcome. The higher scores mean a worse outcome. (NCT02991040)
Timeframe: Visit 2/Day 14 (± 2 days), Visit 3/Day 28 (± 2 days), Visit 4/Day 84 (± 4 days), Visit 5/Day 168 (Week 24) (± 7 days)

InterventionWrinkle Severity Rating scale (Mean)
Visit 2/Week 2Visit 3/ Week 4Visit 4/Week 12Visit 5/Week 24
Revanesse Ultra+-0.030.020.00-0.02

[back to top]

Pain Measured by Subject on 100 mm VAS Scale at 15, 30, 45, and 60 Minutes Post Injection and at 2 Weeks Post Injection

Visual Analog Scale for pain. A 100 mm scale with 0 mm being no pain (best outcome) to 100 mm being worst pain (worst outcome). The higher score means a worse outcome. (NCT02991040)
Timeframe: 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes post injection and at 2 weeks post injection

,
InterventionVAS score (Mean)
15 minutes post injection30 minutes post injection45 minutes post injection60 minutes post injection2 weeks post injection
Revanesse Ultra15.267.464.212.860.25
Revanesse Ultra+9.524.722.662.130.25

[back to top]

Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement

Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Score is a 5-point scale with 1 = Worse (worst outcome); 2 = No Change; 3 = Improved; 4 = Much Improved, 5 = Very much improved (best outcome). The higher scores mean a better outcome. (NCT02991040)
Timeframe: Visit 2/Day 14 (± 2 days), Visit 3/Day 28 (± 2 days), Visit 4/Day 84 (± 4 days), Visit 5/Day 168 (Week 24) (± 7 days)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 2/Week 2Visit 3/Week 4Visit 4/Week 12Visit 5/Week 24
Revanesse Ultra+0.02-0.02-0.010.03

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability of Revanesse Ultra and Revanesse Ultra+ Injection by Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

study products will be compared by evaluating the nature, severity, and frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (NCT02991040)
Timeframe: at injection, Visit 2/Day 14 (± 2 days), Visit 3/Day 28 (± 2 days), Visit 4/Day 84 (± 4 days), Visit 5/Day 168 (Week 24) (± 7 days)

Interventionevents (Number)
Revanesse Ultra+112
Revanesse Ultra102

[back to top]

Pain at Injection as Measured by Subject on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scale at Time 0 Minutes Post Injection

Visual Analog Scale for Pain. A 100 mm scale with 0 mm being no pain (best outcome) to 100 mm being worst pain (worst outcome). The higher scores mean a worse outcome (NCT02991040)
Timeframe: at injection Time 0

InterventionVAS (Mean)
Revanesse Ultra+26.2
Revanesse Ultra39.4

[back to top]

Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Modified

The BPI was evaluated on a scale from 0-10. Zero would mean no interference and 10 would be calculated at complete interferences. We used a 7-point questionnaire about pain. All scores were calculated at baseline and three months. (NCT03028012)
Timeframe: Baseline and Three Months

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Participant Number #3 at BaselineParticipant Number #3 at 3 MonthsParticipant Number #8 at BaselineParticipant #8 at 3 Months
Ketorolac8353

[back to top]

Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRS) at Baseline and Three Months.

TPI were treated with a needle inserted into the trigger point with the goal of eliciting a local twitch responses(LTRs). When a LTR was obtained, 0.1mL of randomized drug was injected into that location within the muscle. This was repeated until LTRs disappeared, or 1.0mL had been injected, whichever came first. Such was performed in a similar manner for all affected muscles, up to a maximum of 2mL. Participants self-report their brief pain inventory at each of their injections (up to four subsequent injections) based off of the standardized Numeric Rating pain Scale (NRS). The NRS is nationally recognized numeric scale from zero to ten, with zero being an example of no pain,one to three would demonstrate mild pain, four to six would be moderate pain, seven to nine would be severe pain and a ten would be the worst pain possible. Improvement in BPI was determined if their NRS score went down with each injection(s). (NCT03028012)
Timeframe: Pre-Injection and Three Month Post Injection(s)

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Participant Number 3 at BaselineParticipant Number 3 at 3 MonthsParticipant Number 8 at BaselineParticipant Number 8 at 3 Months
Ketorolac8353

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Responder Rate Greater Than 50% on the Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRS) Improvement

Participants in this study underwent TPIs by the following method. The needle was inserted into the trigger point with the goal of eliciting a local twitch responses(LTRs). When a LTR was obtained, 0.1mL of randomized drug was injected into that location within the muscle. This was repeated until LTRs disappeared, or 1.0mL had been injected, whichever came first. This was performed in a similar manner for all affected muscles, up to a maximum of 2mL. Participants self-report their brief pain inventory at each of their injections (up to four subsequent injections) based off of the standardized Numeric Rating pain Scale (NRS). The NRS is nationally recognized numeric scale from zero to ten, with zero being an example of no pain, one to three would demonstrate mild pain, four to six would be moderate pain, seven to nine would be severe pain and a ten would be the worst pain possible. Improvement in BPI was determined if their NRS score went down with each injection(s). (NCT03028012)
Timeframe: Pre-Post Injections Up to Three Months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ketorolac1
Lidocaine0
Dexamethasone0

[back to top]

Provider Satisfaction

I would like to use this method of administering intranasal midazolam and lidocaine again in the future (NCT03054844)
Timeframe: 1 minute

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PREMED8
PREMIX24

[back to top]

Procedural Pain

The Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) utilizes six observational factors (cry, facial, verbal, torso, touch, and legs) to evaluate pain in young children and can be used to monitor the effectiveness of interventions for reducing the pain and discomfort of an intervention. This scale rates each behavior numerically, with a score of 4-6 units on a scale representing no pain, and a maximum score of 13 units on a scale representing (most pain perceived). (NCT03054844)
Timeframe: 10 minutes

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
PREMED10.6
PREMIX10.5

[back to top]

Procedural Distress, OSBD-R

The Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress-Revised (OSBD-R) is an observational measure of pain and distress shown to have strong validity in children. The scale is an 8-factor, weighted observational scale used to measure distress associated with medical procedures, which has been validated in children and adults aged 1 to 20 years. The total Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress-Revised score is the sum of the scale scores for each phase, with each phase assigned a score from 0 to 23.5 units on a scale (0=no distress, 23.5=maximum distress), based on the frequency and types of behaviors observed during a predetermined number of 15-second intervals during each phase. There were four phases so the range of scores for the total OSBD-R was 0 to 94 units on a scale, with a higher score indicated a greater degree of distress. (NCT03054844)
Timeframe: 10 minutes

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
PREMED6.4
PREMIX7

[back to top]

Procedural Distress, Cry Duration

Cry duration was measured in seconds and defined as the time from onset of crying following administration of an IN medication until the cessation of crying sounds and/or tears. If a patient did not cry, the cry duration was zero (NCT03054844)
Timeframe: 10 minutes

Interventionseconds (Mean)
PREMED84
PREMIX73

[back to top]

Parental Satisfaction

If my child needed medications to stay calm for a procedure, I would like to use these same medications again. (NCT03054844)
Timeframe: 1 minute

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PREMED10
PREMIX12

[back to top]

Procedural Distress, FLACC

The Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale is comprised of five criteria (face, legs, activity, cry, consolability), with a possible score of 0 to 2 units on a scale for each criteria and a possible total score of 0 to 10 units on a scale (0 meaning no pain, 10 meaning most pain). (NCT03054844)
Timeframe: 10 minutes

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
PREMED6.7
PREMIX7

[back to top]

Investigators Rating of Patient Discomfort

"Investigator rates patient's nonverbal display of discomfort.~Investigator Assessments:~Induction Discomfort Scale (during injection and within 5 seconds after injection)~No change in patient behavior (0)~Grimace (1)~IV forearm withdrawal (2)~Moaning (3)~Verbal statement of discomfort (it hurts, etc.) (4) 0 indicates desired outcome of no pain and 4 indicates worst IV pain experienced." (NCT03057704)
Timeframe: During injection at beginning of study period; lasts 10 seconds one time only

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intravenous Lidocaine: Flushed1.12
Intravenous Lidocaine: Tourniquet0

[back to top]

Subject's Recall of Injection Discomfort

"Investigator asks patient if they recall discomfort during injection after the procedure.~Patient's verbal rating and recall of pain during injection.~We used a Verbal Rating Scale from the patient that self-described discomfort level during injection using question:~How would you rate your pain using None, Mild, Moderate, Severe and record it on this 4-point scale:~None (0)~Mild (1)~Moderate (2)~Severe (3) None is no pain (best outcome) and Severe is worst pain possible (worst outcome)." (NCT03057704)
Timeframe: This occurs 30 minutes after the subject's procedure is finished in the recovery room; lasts 30 seconds one time only

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intravenous Lidocaine: Flushed0.52
Intravenous Lidocaine: Tourniquet0.04

[back to top]

Patient Expression of Pain

"Patient's verbal rating of pain during injection (see link to study protocol)~We used a Verbal Rating Scale from the patient that self-described discomfort level during injection using question:~How would you rate your pain using None, Mild, Moderate, Severe and record it on this 4-point scale:~None (0)~Mild (1)~Moderate (2)~Severe (3) None is no pain (best outcome) and Severe is worst pain possible (worst outcome)." (NCT03057704)
Timeframe: During injection at beginning of study; lasts 10 seconds one time only

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intravenous Lidocaine: Flushed0.76
Intravenous Lidocaine: Tourniquet0.04

[back to top]

Comparing the Blood Gas Analysis After the Intervention of the Each Group

data of arterial partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2) and PaCO2 at different point during the operation (NCT03086213)
Timeframe: During the operation, an average of one hour

,
InterventioncmH2O (Mean)
arterial partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2)arterial partial pressure of PaC
Intercostals Nerve Block Group96.247.3
Paravertebral Nerve Block Group95.251.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Concentration of Cortisol at Different Point During the Operation

(NCT03086213)
Timeframe: During the operation, an average of one hour

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
During the operation, 0mDuring the operation, 15mDuring the operation, 30mDuring the operation, 60m
Intercostals Nerve Block Group125221290318
Paravertebral Nerve Block Group120208258267

[back to top]

Comparing the Inflammatory Markers During the Operation After the Intervention of the Each Group

serum concentrations of Interleukin-6 (NCT03086213)
Timeframe: During the operation, an average of one hour

,
Interventionpg/L (Mean)
Interleukin-6 T0Interleukin-6 T1Interleukin-6 T2Interleukin-6 T3
Intercostals Nerve Block Group35425354
Paravertebral Nerve Block Group33394447

[back to top]

Comparing the Hemodynamics of the Intervention of the Each Group During the Operation

data of mean arterial pressure (NCT03086213)
Timeframe: During the operation, an average of one hour

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
mean arterial pressure T0mean arterial pressure T1mean arterial pressure T2mean arterial pressure T3
Intercostals Nerve Block Group80868580
Paravertebral Nerve Block Group79857278

[back to top]

Comparing the Hemodynamics of the Intervention of the Each Group During the Operation

data of heart rate (NCT03086213)
Timeframe: During the operation, an average of one hour

,
Interventionbpm (Mean)
heart rate T0heart rate T1heart rate T2heart rate T3
Intercostals Nerve Block Group79859280
Paravertebral Nerve Block Group78848178

[back to top]

Time Required to Place the Epidural Catheter

The time required to place the epidural catheter will be recorded (NCT03087604)
Timeframe: From the initiation of procedure to end of procedure

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Traditional Technique Group33.9
Electric Stimulation Group24.0

[back to top]

Success Rate of Placement of a Thoracic Epidural

will be determined by the detection of a loss of sensation to cold (ice) in at least two contiguous dermatomal levels, 15 minutes after administration of a test dose of lidocaine through the epidural catheter. If a loss of cold sensation is found, then the epidural placement will be classified as successful. If no loss of cold sensation is found, then the epidural placement will be classified as unsuccessful. (NCT03087604)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after administration of a test dose of lidocaine

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Traditional Technique Group41
Electric Stimulation Group45

[back to top]

Mechanical Thresholds (Mechanical Detection and Pain).

Assess mechanical detection and pain thresholds using von Frey filaments stimulators (measured in force mN) to calculate the final threshold as the geometric mean of five series of ascending and descending stimuli. (NCT03096444)
Timeframe: 5 minutes

,,,,
InterventionmN (Mean)
Mechanical Detection ThresholdMechanical Pain Threshold
Topical Amitriptyline3.573423965152.4768146
Topical KeAmLi Combo3.519376956152.3293608
Topical Ketamine3.464204768135.9
Topical Lidocaine3.546037659126.9
Topical Vehicle3.525692637148.7138273

[back to top]

Thermal Threshold Detection (Warmth and Heat Pain)

Two standardized quantitative sensory tests are performed to measure warmth detection threshold (assesses the threshold of which warmth sensation is first detected) and heat pain threshold (assesses the threshold at which heat pain sensation is first detected). Measured in change in celsius. (NCT03096444)
Timeframe: 3 minutes

,,,,
InterventionDegrees celsius (Mean)
Warm Detection ThresholdHeat Pain Threshold
Topical Amitriptyline33.940.0
Topical KeAmLi Combo33.639.8
Topical Ketamine34.040.0
Topical Lidocaine33.739.4
Topical Vehicle33.839.7

[back to top]

Peak Itch Intensity Between the Vehicle and Active Treatments (Individual and KeAmLi-combo).

"Peak itch intensity between the vehicle and 4 other active treatments (individual ketamine, amitriptyline, or lidocaine, and KeAmLi-combo). Itch intensity was measured on a 100mm scale visual analog scale for 10 minutes. 0 was weighted with no itch and 100 was weighted with most itch imaginable." (NCT03096444)
Timeframe: 10 minutes

InterventionIntensity score (Mean)
Topical KeAmLi Combo62.7
Topical Ketamine63.1
Topical Amitriptyline69.2
Topical Lidocaine65.8
Topical Vehicle61.9

[back to top]

Percent Responders With 1 Point Improvement on the Medicis Midface Volume Scale

"The primary objective is to demonstrate superiority of Perlane-Lido relative to no-treatment in the treatment of Midface volume Deficit and/or Midface Contour Deficiency by comparing the percent responders, defined by at least 1 point improvement from baseline on the MMVS on both sides of the face, as measured by blinded evaluator at 6 months.~Medicis Midface Volume Scale (MMVS) is a 4-grade scale assesses the fullness of the midface from Fairly Full (1) to Substantial Loss of Fullness (4) as described below. The blinded evaluator and treating investigator will rate the subject's right and left midface for severity of volume deficiency using the MMVS at all applicable study visits.~Fairly full midface~Mild loss of fullness in midface area~Moderate loss of fullness with slight hollowing below malar prominence~Substantial loss of fullness in the midface area, clearly apparent hollowing below malar prominence" (NCT03097783)
Timeframe: 6 month

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Restylane Perlane Lidocaine67
No Intervention Arm8

[back to top]

Gracely Sensory Scale Pain Rating Changes in Response to Lidocaine and Capsaicin Creams and tDCS

The Gracely Sensory Scale allows participants to rate the intensity of heat pain stimuli on a scale from 0 to 20, with 0 indicating no pain sensation and 20 indicating extremely intense pain. The outcome measure data table shows mean pain ratings for the lidocaine, capsaicin, and neutral creams after enhancement, inhibition, or sham tDCS stimulation. (NCT03102710)
Timeframe: up to 2 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pain rating on nocebo creamPain rating on placebo creamPain rating on neutral cream
Sham tDCS9.017.387.88
tDCS Enhancement8.547.298.10
tDCS Inhibition8.806.417.96

[back to top]

fMRI Resting States Functional Connectivity Changes During Pain Stimulation

"We measured changes in blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) activity in the brain during pain stimulation. In the outcome measure data table, placebo contrast indicates lidocaine - neutral and nocebo contrast indicates capsaicin - neutral." (NCT03102710)
Timeframe: up to 2 weeks

,,
InterventionArbitrary unit (Mean)
BOLD activity change in mPFC/ACC: placebo contrastBOLD activity change in mPFC/ACC: nocebo contrastBOLD activity in the left insula: placebo contrastBOLD activity in the left insula: nocebo contrast
Sham tDCS-0.170.250.180.30
tDCS Enhancement0.140.260.110.08
tDCS Inhibition0.500.270.210.16

[back to top]

Comparison of Functional Connectivity Changes of the DLPFC Before and After tDCS Stimulation

We investigated the effects of cathodal (inhibition) and anodal (enhancement) tDCS on rDLPFC functional connectivity (FC) with the supplementary motor area (SMA) and anterior insula. Higher Fisher Z-scores represent greater resting-state functional connectivity. (NCT03102710)
Timeframe: up to 2 weeks

,,
InterventionFisher Z value (Mean)
rDLPFC-SMA Functional Connectivity (post-pre)rDLPFC-Insula Functional Connectivity (post-pre)
Sham tDCS0.080.07
tDCS Enhancement-0.11-0.13
tDCS Inhibition-0.09-0.13

[back to top]

Degree of Motor Block

degree of motor block which means the amount of weakness in the legs experienced by the participants. this was determined by using the Bromage scale where 4 = greatest amount of motor block or muscle weakness and 0 = the least amount of motor block. (NCT03103100)
Timeframe: Baseline to 1 hour

InterventionBromage Score (Mean)
1% Lidocaine2.0
0.25% Bupivacaine1.7
Bupivacaine Plus Lidocaine1.9

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Achieve Adequate Analgesia

The number of patients who received an adequate epidural level of T10 or higher (NCT03103100)
Timeframe: Baseline to 1 hour

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1% Lidocaine23
0.25% Bupivacaine25
Bupivacaine Plus Lidocaine23

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Experienced of Maternal Hypotension

Number of patients who experienced maternal hypotension defined as a blood pressure (BP) >20% decline from baseline and need for vasopressor therapy (NCT03103100)
Timeframe: Baseline to 1 hour

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1% Lidocaine4
0.25% Bupivacaine0
Bupivacaine Plus Lidocaine0

[back to top]

Time to Achieve an Adequate Epidural Level for Labor Analgesia

time it takes to achieve a T10 dermatome level by pinprick. A T10 dermatome level is what is needed to control labor pain. (NCT03103100)
Timeframe: Baseline to 1 hour

Interventionminutes (Mean)
1% Lidocaine7.0
0.25% Bupivacaine11.0
Bupivacaine Plus Lidocaine8.5

[back to top]

Pain After Speculum Placement, Cervical Dilation, and Aspiration

Pain scores were measured at multiple points throughout the procedure. Pain scores were measured using a 100 mm visual analog scale with 0 being no pain and 100 being the worst pain ever. (NCT03107754)
Timeframe: Immediately after speculum placement, cervical dilation, uterine aspiration

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
After insertion of speculumAfter cervical dilationAfter uterine aspiration
Buffered Lidocaine Paracervical Block175569
Standard Paracervical Block1360.0667.5

[back to top]

Injection Pain

For the primary outcome, pain immediately after paracervical block injection was measured by a scale. The scale used was the 100-mm visual analog scale. The minimum score was 0 and the maximum score was 100. Higher numbers indicate worse pain. (NCT03107754)
Timeframe: Immediately after injection of the paracervical block

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Standard Paracervical Block44.5
Buffered Lidocaine Paracervical Block30

[back to top]

Subject-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score Following Tympanic Membrane Tap for Subjects Treated With Active Tymbion Iontophoresis Compared to VAS Score for Subjects Treated With Sham Tymbion Iontophoresis.

"The VAS consists of a 100 millimeter (mm) line with a statement at each end representing the extreme limits of pain intensity (where 0 represents No pain and 100 represents The worst imaginable pain). The subject reports their pain intensity by making a mark along the line and the line is measured to convert the subject response to numeric score (0-100 in millimeters). The data will be summarized as the difference in mean VAS scores between the two treatment groups (active Tymbion iontophoresis compared to sham Tymbion iontophoresis)." (NCT03119181)
Timeframe: Day 0

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Active Tymbion Iontophoresis4.2
Sham Tymbion Iontophoresis18.3

[back to top]

Pain Disability Index Score (PDI) at Six Months Following Surgical Procedure

Pain Disability Index score (PDI) ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores reflecting higher interference of pain with daily activities. (NCT03120351)
Timeframe: After surgery until postoperative day 7, 30, 90 and 180

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PDI on postoperative day 7PDI on postoperative day 30PDI on postoperative day 90PDI on postoperative day 180
LIDOCAINE PATCH 5%26123.21.7
Placebo Patch30135.04.8

[back to top]

Change in Strength in Both Groups After CESI.

Change in strength in both groups greater than or equal to 20% weakness in one or more myotomes 30 minutes after CESI using a hand held Dynamometer. (NCT03127137)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after the CESI procedure

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Yes, greater or equal to 20% weakness in greater or equal to 1 or more myotomeNo, greater or equal to 20% weakness in greater or equal to 1 or more myotome
Experimental Group 1 With Lidocaine2535
Experimental Group 2 With Saline3030

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Improved on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)

Assessed by blinded evaluator (NCT03127384)
Timeframe: Month 1, Month 3

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 1Month 3
No-treatment Control06
Treatment9683

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Lower Scar Severity in the Treated Cheek Compared to the Untreated Cheek

Overall scar severity assessed by blinded evaluator. (NCT03127384)
Timeframe: Month 3

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Split-face: Treatment/No-treatment Control81

[back to top]

Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Mandibular Molar Anesthesia

Subjects' mandibular molar teeth will be tested before anesthetic and every 30 minutes with cold and electric pulp test for presence of anesthesia as reported by subjects yes or no (NCT03127943)
Timeframe: Every 30 minutes up to 120 minutes Total

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Buffered 1% Lidocaine, Then Non-Buffered 1% Lidocaine100
Non-buffered 1% Lididocaine, the Buffered 1% Lidocaine106

[back to top]

Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Mandibular Canine Anesthesia

Subjects' mandibular molar teeth will be tested before anesthetic and every 30 minutes with cold and electric pulp test for presence of anesthesia as reported by subjects yes or no (NCT03127943)
Timeframe: 30 minute intervals up to 120 minutes

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Buffered 1% Lidocaine, Then Non-Buffered 1% Lidocaine81.3
Non-buffered 1% Lididocaine, the Buffered 1% Lidocaine97.5

[back to top]

Measurement of Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax)

maximum (or peak) serum concentration that a drug achieves in a specified compartment or test area of the body after the drug has been administered (NCT03145207)
Timeframe: six study sessions for each participant; through 15 h each study session

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Lidocaine Name Brand Patch306.8
Lidocaine Generic Patch214.9
Lidocaine Name Brand Patch Early Heat390.76
Lidocaine Name Brand Patch Late Heat286.49
Lidocaine Generic Early Heat368.09
Lidocaine Generic Late Heat314.95

[back to top]

Number of Participants That Responded to Treatment

To assess effectiveness using the 4-point Midface Volume Scale. Responder defined as at least a one point improvement from the baseline score at 2 weeks after week 16 re-treatment (visit only required for participants who received re-treatment at week 16). (NCT03160716)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment43

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Aesthetic Improvement

"To assess effectiveness using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Responders defined as Improved or better on the GAIS as assessed by the investigator and participant at 2 weeks after week 16 re-treatment (visit only required for participants who received re-treatment at week 16)." (NCT03160716)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment43

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety]

To assess the adverse events (incidence, intensity, and duration) of Restylane® Lyft with Lidocaine in conjunction with the use of a cannula. (NCT03160716)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment5

[back to top]

Subject Satisfaction

To assess subject satisfaction with the treatment using the FACE-Q. Score range 1-100. The higher total score indicate greater subject satisfaction. (NCT03160716)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment77.3

[back to top]

Treatment Differences in Pain (Restylane Perlane Side - Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

"Subjects that reported at least 10 mm less VAS pain associated with injections of Perlane-Lido compared to Perlane at the time of injection.~VAS=Visual Analogue Scale. The VAS is a subjective scale to measure pain intensity. The participant is instructed to put a vertical mark, approximating the pain experienced during the procedure, on a 100 mm (millimeter) horizontal line labelled no pain at the left end and the worst pain you can imagine at the right end. The distance in mm from the left end (no pain) to the participant's VAS mark is measured with a standard ruler." (NCT03174132)
Timeframe: At the time of injection

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Restylane Perlane Lidocaine and Restylane Perlane87.1

[back to top]

Treatment Differences in Pain (Restylane Perlane Side - Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

"Subjects that reported at least 10 mm less VAS pain associated with injections of Perlane-Lido compared to Perlane at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after injection.~VAS=Visual Analogue Scale. The VAS is a subjective scale to measure pain intensity. The participant is instructed to put a vertical mark, approximating the pain experienced during the procedure, on a 100 mm (millimeter) horizontal line labelled no pain at the left end and the worst pain you can imagine at the right end. The distance in mm from the left end (no pain) to the participant's VAS mark is measured with a standard ruler." (NCT03174132)
Timeframe: 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after injection

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
after 15 minutesafter 30 minutesafter 45 minutesafter 60 minutes
Restylane Perlane Lidocaine and Restylane Perlane64.342.931.424.3

[back to top]

CIPN Score on EORTC QLQ-CIPN20

"Change in CIPN (Chemotherapy-induced peripheral Neuropathy) score (on EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 tool ) from baseline to the Cycle 6 (12 weeks), and from baseline to last follow-up (34-36 weeks). EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (worst symptoms). A higher score represents worse neuropathy. The changes in scores are compared between study arms.~EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 tool is a quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for evaluation of CIPN." (NCT03254394)
Timeframe: 12 weeks and 34-36 weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
1234-36 weeks
Lidocaine + FOLFOX437.0
Placebo + FOLFOX217.0

[back to top]

Changes in NPSI Score.

Changes in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) descriptors of neuropathic pain over time from baseline to cycle 3(6 weeks), cycle 6 (12 weeks), and the last follow-up (34-36 weeks). The total NPSI score ranges from 0 to 100; a higher NPSI total score represents a worse neuropathy outcome. The changes in scores from baseline are compared between study arms. (NCT03254394)
Timeframe: 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 34-36 weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
6 weeks visit12 weeks visitlast follow-up visit
Lidocaine + FOLFOX0013.5
Placebo + FOLFOX003.0

[back to top]

The Cumulative Dose of Oxaliplatin

The cumulative dose of oxaliplatin received over the course (up to 12 cycles) of mFOLFOX6 treatment regimen. It corresponds to the absolute summed up quantity of Oxaliplatin administered to the patient over time. There is no range for this measure. Since this is a dose-limiting neuropathy prevention study, the higher value can be interpreted as better outcome. (NCT03254394)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionmg (Mean)
Placebo + FOLFOX1161.8
Lidocaine + FOLFOX1294.8

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Intensity of Oxaliplatin-induced Cold Pain/Unpleasantness vs Time

"The intensity of cold pain and cold unpleasantness is evaluated separately, assessed daily on a 0-10 scale, upon holding a pre-cooled (~8°C) metal cylinder for 10 seconds. the area under the curve of cold pain and cold unpleasantness vs time is calculated per chemotherapy cycle (every two weeks) and serves as a primary outcome measure.~For intervention (lidocaine+FOLFOX) and control (placebo+FOLFOX) groups, the average of cold pain AUC and cold unpleasantness AUC over 7 cycles was calculated. The average AUCs over 7 cycles were compared between study arms.~The AUC is measured as a score on a 0-10 scale multiplied by 14 days and may range between 0 and 140. Higher AUC values represent more intense cold pain/unpleasantness." (NCT03254394)
Timeframe: 14 weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale*days (Mean)
pain AUCunpleasantness AUC
Lidocaine + FOLFOX9.525.4
Placebo + FOLFOX16.433.1

[back to top]

Rescue Medication

no need for off-protocol parenteral pain medication during the ED visit. The following parenteral medications will be considered off protocol pain medication: any opioid, any non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NCT03300674)
Timeframe: 4 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intravenous Hydromorphone20
Intravenous Lidocaine39

[back to top]

Adverse Events

Any new symptom development after administration of investigational medication (NCT03300674)
Timeframe: 4 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intravenous Hydromorphone28
Intravenous Lidocaine23

[back to top]

Change in 0-10 Pain Scale Between Baseline and 90 Minutes

Participants were asked to describe their pain on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0= no pain and 10= the worst pain imaginable (NCT03300674)
Timeframe: up to 90 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intravenous Hydromorphone5.0
Intravenous Lidocaine3.8

[back to top]

Residual Drug Analysis in Worn TDDS and Patches

The amount of drug remaining in the patches is measured after the patches have been worn and removed. This outcome is only reported for the patch arms of the study and is not applicable to the intravenous arm. (NCT03310970)
Timeframe: Measured after patches are removed from subjects following 12 hours of patch wear.

Interventionmg (Mean)
Lidocaine 5% patchLidoderm® 5% patch
All Study Participants123.79655.16

[back to top]

Measurement of Time of Maximum Serum Lidocaine Concentration (Tmax).

Tmax is the time point at which the maximum drug concentration in serum is measured. (NCT03310970)
Timeframe: For both patch arms measured at time points: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 48 hours. For intravenous lidocaine hydrochloride arm measured at time points: 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 45 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 hours.

Interventionhours (Mean)
Lidocaine 5% patchLidoderm® 5% patchIntravenous lidocaine hydrochloride
All Study Participants9.0810.820.03

[back to top]

Measurement of Maximum Serum Concentration of Lidocaine (Cmax)

Cmax is the highest lidocaine concentration measured in the serum. (NCT03310970)
Timeframe: For both patch arms measured at time points: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 48 hours. For intravenous lidocaine hydrochloride arm measured at time points: 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 45 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 hours.

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Lidocaine 5% patchLidoderm® 5% patchIntravenous lidocaine hydrochloride
All Study Participants113.95123.54706.15

[back to top]

Measurement of Elimination Rate Constant of Lidocaine (Kel)

The elimination rate constant is a mathematical value describing the rate at which lidocaine is removed from the body. (NCT03310970)
Timeframe: For both patch arms measured at time points: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 48 hours. For intravenous lidocaine hydrochloride arm measured at time points: 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 45 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 hours.

Intervention1/hr (Mean)
Lidocaine 5% patchLidoderm® 5% patchIntravenous lidocaine hydrochloride
All Study Participants0.170.190.31

[back to top]

Determination of Area Under the Serum-concentration-time Curve (AUC)

Area under the serum-concentration-time curve is a mathematical measure of total systemic exposure to lidocaine in the body. (NCT03310970)
Timeframe: For both patch arms measured at time points: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 hours. For intravenous lidocaine hydrochloride arm measured at time points: 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 45 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 hours.

Interventionng*h/ml (Mean)
Lidocaine 5% patchLidoderm® 5% patchIntravenous lidocaine hydrochloride
All Study Participants807.32748.55671.07

[back to top]

Measurement of Volume of Lidocaine Distribution (V)

Volume of distribution is a mathematical concept that relates the amount of lidocaine in the body to the concentration of lidocaine measured in the serum. (NCT03310970)
Timeframe: For both patch arms measured at time points: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 48 hours. For intravenous lidocaine hydrochloride arm measured at time points: 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 45 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 hours.

InterventionL/kg (Mean)
Lidocaine 5% patchLidoderm® 5% patchIntravenous lidocaine hydrochloride
All Study Participants5.135.151.98

[back to top]

Mean Pain Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Pain was assessed using a using a 10 centimeter (cm) VAS. It included 21-numbered circles at 0.5 cm increments, spanning 10 cm total, and was anchored by word descriptors. The VAS scores ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very severe pain).The level of pain was evaluated for each NLF independently immediately upon completion of injection (time zero) on Day 1. (NCT03319719)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Test Product: BBL3.07
Control Product: BB5.94

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Incidence of Any Common Treatment Site Response (CTR) Evaluated Using Participant Diaries

CTR were evaluated using participant diaries. Participants recorded daily in the diary any pre-defined CTR that occurred. These CTR included swelling, firmness, lumps/bumps, bruising, pain, tenderness upon pressing, redness, discoloration (not redness or bruising), itching, stinging/burning, and numbness. (NCT03319719)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Test Product: BBL41
Control Product: BB45

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 1-point Improvement as Evaluated Using Merz NLF Scale at Week 6

The Merz NLF scale was used to measure the aesthetic effectiveness of the study products. Each NLF was assessed separately. The Merz NLF scale is a 5-grade scale ranging from 0 (no folds) to 4 (very severe folds). Response was defined >=1-point improvement on the Merz NLF Scale for each NLF compared to baseline. (NCT03319719)
Timeframe: Week 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Test Product: BBL51.0
Control Product: BB52.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Incidence of Any CTR by Duration Evaluated Using Participant Diaries

CTR were evaluated using participant diaries. Participants recorded daily in the diary any pre-defined CTR that occurred. These CTR included swelling, firmness, lumps/bumps, bruising, pain, tenderness upon pressing, redness, discoloration (not redness or bruising), itching, stinging/burning, and numbness. (NCT03319719)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 6

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 to 3 days4 to 7 days8 to 17 days15 to 30 daysGreater than (>) 30 days
Control Product: BB2014920
Test Product: BBL1614830

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Incidence of Any CTR by Severity Evaluated Using Participant Diaries

CTR were evaluated using participant diaries. Participants recorded daily in the diary any pre-defined CTR that occurred. These CTR included swelling, firmness, lumps/bumps, bruising, pain, tenderness upon pressing, redness, discoloration (not redness or bruising), itching, stinging/burning, and numbness. (NCT03319719)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 6

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
MildModerateSevere
Control Product: BB24183
Test Product: BBL23144

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

(NCT03319719)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
TEAEsSAEs
Belotero Balance With or Without Lidocaine50

[back to top]

Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score (RASS)

The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) is a medical scale used to measure the agitation or sedation level of a patient.. It is a 10-point scale comprised of four levels of agitation (+1 to +4), one level defining a calm and alert state (0) and five levels of sedation (-1 to -5). The higher the positive number (+) the more agitated or combative a patient is and the higher the negative number (-) the deeper the sedation of the patient. (NCT03343080)
Timeframe: 4 hours post-extubation

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Buffered Lidocaine-0.2
Air Only-0.4

[back to top]

Total Duration of Mechanical Ventilation

Total amount of time that the participant is intubated as measured in minutes. (NCT03343080)
Timeframe: baseline through extubation

Interventionminutes (Median)
Buffered Lidocaine499
Air Only529

[back to top]

Total Sedation Requirements

Total amount of Propofol dose used as measured in total milligrams. (NCT03343080)
Timeframe: baseline through extubation

Interventionmilligrams (Mean)
Buffered Lidocaine325
Air Only1158

[back to top]

"The Percentage of Participants Reporting Patient Global Impression of Change Score of 6-7 (Indicating Much Improved and Very Much Improved)"

"Patient Global Impression of Change is a scale which measures participant reported satisfaction after an intervention. The outcome was measured as the percent of patients reporting a PGIC score of 6-7 (indicating much improved and very much improved)" (NCT03382821)
Timeframe: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, and 1 year follow up

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
One monthThree monthsSix monthsOne year
Transforaminal Catheter-targeted ESI With Triamcinolone59575361
Transforaminal ESI With Dexamethasone41425557

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants With Reduction of 50% or More of Neck and Arm Pain NRS Score

The Percentage of Participants with Reduction of 50% or More of Neck and Arm Pain NRS score (NCT03382821)
Timeframe: 1 month follow up

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Transforaminal ESI With Dexamethasone49.1
Interlaminar Catheter-targeted ESI With Triamcinolone68.5

[back to top]

Neck Disability Index-5

Percentage of patients with >30% improvement in Neck Disability Index-5 score. (NCT03382821)
Timeframe: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, and 1 year follow up

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
One monthThree monthSix monthOne year
Transforaminal Catheter-targeted ESI With Triamcinolone62585660
Transforaminal ESI With Dexamethasone48565547

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting >6.8 Reduction on the Medication Quantification Scale III

The Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) is an instrument used for clinical and research applications for quantifying medication regimen use in chronic pain populations. A 6.8 point reduction is considered equivalent to 10 morphine eqivalents. (NCT03382821)
Timeframe: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, and 1 year follow up

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
One monthThree monthSix monthOne year
Transforaminal Catheter-targeted ESI With Triamcinolone1917198
Transforaminal ESI With Dexamethasone1620157

[back to top]

Secondary Outcome: Number of Participants With Requirement for Intraoperative Analgesia Supplementation

This requirement for any rescue medications to control discomfort or pain during CD (NCT03414359)
Timeframe: 1 hour

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
2% Lidocaine4
3% Chloroprocaine7

[back to top]

The Onset Time to Surgical Anesthesia

The onset time to surgical anesthesia, as reported by the participant using a standard procedure This will be measured by the time taken from the end of the epidural loading dose to develop a loss of touch sensation using a neurotip® (Owen Mumford, USA) device bilaterally at the T7 dermatomal level using a non-inferiority study design. A non-inferiority limit of 3 minutes was chosen apriori. (NCT03414359)
Timeframe: Up to 35 minutes

Interventionseconds (Mean)
2% Lidocaine558
3% Chloroprocaine655

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Final Study Visit for Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS)

The CR-SMFRS score was based on the investigator's clinical evaluation of the participant, where submental fullness was scored on a 5-point scale where: 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, and 4=extreme. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. (NCT03425253)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 58

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline to Week 58
BELKYRA® and Juvéderm® VOLUMA™ With Lidocaine2.5-1.9

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Final Study Visit in the FACE-Q™ Appraisal of Neck

The participant assessed satisfaction using the 10 items on the Appraisal of Neck module of the FACE-Q™ questionnaire measured on a 4-point scale where: 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=moderately, 4=extremely. The Rasch transformed scale total score was 0 (worst) to 100 (best). A positive change from baseline indicated improvement. (NCT03425253)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 58

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline to Week 58
BELKYRA® and Juvéderm® VOLUMA™ With Lidocaine13.8-11.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Showed ≥ 1-point Jawline Improvement From Baseline on the Allergan Loss of Jawline Definition Scale (ALJDS), as Assessed by the Investigator

The ALJDS was an investigator assessment of loss of jawline definition measured by a 5-point scale where: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme. Data is reported for both sides of the face, right side of the face and left side of the face. (NCT03425253)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 58

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Both Sides of the FaceRight Side of the FaceLeft Side of the Face
BELKYRA® and Juvéderm® VOLUMA™ With Lidocaine92.992.992.9

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Final Study Visit for Submental Skin Laxity Grade (SMSLG) Score

The SMSLG scale integrated 3 skin features: skin wrinkling, adherence to underlying neck structures (bone and muscle), and redundancy (horizontal and vertical folds) assessed by the investigator using a 4-point scale where: 1=none, 2=mild, 3=moderate and 4=severe. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. (NCT03425253)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 58

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline to Week 58
BELKYRA® and Juvéderm® VOLUMA™ With Lidocaine2.0-0.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Final Study Visit in the FACE-Q™ Satisfaction With Lower Face and Jawline Score

The participant assessed satisfaction using the 5 items on the Satisfaction of Lower Face and Jawline module of the FACE-Q™ questionnaire, measured on a 4-point scale where: 1=very dissatisfied, 2=somewhat dissatisfied, 3=somewhat satisfied, 4=very satisfied. The Rasch transformed scale total score was 0 (worst) to 100 (best). A positive change from baseline indicated improvement. (NCT03425253)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 58

Interventionscore on a score (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline to Week 58
BELKYRA® and Juvéderm® VOLUMA™ With Lidocaine24.155.9

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Final Study Visit for Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (PR-SMFRS)

"The PR-SMFRS was based on the participant's response to the question How much fat do you have under your chin right now? and answered on a 5-point ordinal scale where: 0=no chin fat at all, 1=a slight amount of chin fat, 2=a moderate amount of chin fat, 3=a large amount of chin fat, and 4=a very large amount of chin fat. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement." (NCT03425253)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 58

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline to Week 58
BELKYRA® and Juvéderm® VOLUMA™ With Lidocaine2.3-1.6

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Final Study Visit for FACE-Q™ Appraisal of Area Under Chin

The participant assessed satisfaction using the 5 items on the Appraisal of Area Under Chin module of the FACE-Q™ questionnaire measured on a 4-point scale where: 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=moderately, 4=extremely. The Rasch transformed scale total score was 0 (worst) to 100 (best). A negative change from baseline indicated worsening. (NCT03425253)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 58

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline to Week 58
BELKYRA® and Juvéderm® VOLUMA™ With Lidocaine60.1-45.4

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Last BELKYRA® Treatment on the ALJDS

The ALJDS was an investigator and independent reviewer assessment of jawline contour measured by a 5-point scale where: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. The data is reported for both sides of the face, right side of the face and left side of the face. (NCT03425253)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Last Treatment (Up to Week 48)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Investigator: Both Sides of Face, BaselineInvestigator: Both Sides of Face, Last TreatmentInvestigator: Right Side of Face, BaselineInvestigator: Right Side of Face, Last TreatmentInvestigator: Left Side of Face, BaselineInvestigator: Left Side of Face, Last TreatmentIndependent Reviewer: Both Sides of Face, BaselineIndependent Reviewer: Both Sides of Face, Last TreatmentIndependent Reviewer: Right Side of Face, BaselineIndependent Reviewer: Right Side of Face, Last TreatmentIndependent Reviewer: Left Side of Face, BaselineIndependent Reviewer: Left Side of Face, Last Treatment
BELKYRA® and Juvéderm® VOLUMA™ With Lidocaine2.7-0.62.5-0.62.6-0.62.9-0.32.7-0.12.7-0.4

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Final Study Visit in Jawline Definition, Based on Independent Reviewer Assessment Using the ALJDS and Photographic Images

The independent reviewer used photographic images collected at the time of the participant's live visit and the ALJDS to assess of loss of jawline definition using a 5-point scale where: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT03425253)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 58

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Both Side of the Face, BaselineBoth Side of the Face, End of StudyRight Side of the Face, BaselineRight Side of the Face, End of studyLeft Side of the Face, BaselineLeft Side of the Face, End of Study
BELKYRA® and Juvéderm® VOLUMA™ With Lidocaine2.9-0.72.7-0.52.8-0.9

[back to top]

Pain Score at Baseline

Pain scores will be recorded at Baseline in a sitting position. Pain scores will be quantified using the Visual analog pain (VAS) scale. The visual analog scale (VAS) is a tool widely used to measure pain. The scale range is 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being severe pain. (NCT03430531)
Timeframe: 15 minutes before the SP block

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block9.33

[back to top]

Pain Score 7 Days Post-SP Block

Patient reported pain scores will be recorded day 7 post SP block in a sitting position. Pain scores will be quantified using the Visual analog pain (VAS) scale. The visual analog scale (VAS) is a tool widely used to measure pain. The scale range is 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being severe pain. (NCT03430531)
Timeframe: 7 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block2.33

[back to top]

Pain Score 60 Minutes Post-SP Block

Pain scores will be recorded 60 minutes post-SP block in a sitting position. Pain scores will be quantified using the Visual analog pain (VAS) scale. The visual analog scale (VAS) is a tool widely used to measure pain. The scale range is 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being severe pain. (NCT03430531)
Timeframe: 60 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block0.33

[back to top]

Pain Score 30 Day Post-SP Block

Patient reported pain scores will be recorded day 30 post SP block in a sitting position. Pain scores will be quantified using the Visual analog pain (VAS) scale. The visual analog scale (VAS) is a tool widely used to measure pain. The scale range is 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being severe pain. (NCT03430531)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block1.67

[back to top]

Pain Score 2 Days Post-SP Block

Patient reported pain scores will be recorded day 2 post SP block in a sitting position. Pain scores will be quantified using the Visual analog pain (VAS) scale. The visual analog scale (VAS) is a tool widely used to measure pain. The scale range is 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being severe pain. (NCT03430531)
Timeframe: 2 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block3.67

[back to top]

Duration of Pain Relief

Patient reported how long after the SP block the patient reported pain scores that were decreased form the baseline measures. The outcome measure is measured in hours that pain relief was achieved. (NCT03430531)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionhours (Mean)
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block13.50

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complications Due to SP Ganglion Block

Patients will be asked to report any side effects, including: allergic reaction to lidocaine, nose irritation and nose-bleed. (NCT03430531)
Timeframe: 15 minutes before the SP block to 30 days post SP block

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Recurrence of Post-dural Puncture Headache

Patient reported recurrence of post dural puncture headache resulting in treatment with epidural blood patch (NCT03430531)
Timeframe: 7 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block4

[back to top]

Pain Score 1 Day Post-SP Block

Patient reported pain scores will be recorded day 1 post SP block in a sitting position. Pain scores will be quantified using the Visual analog pain (VAS) scale. The visual analog scale (VAS) is a tool widely used to measure pain. The scale range is 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being severe pain. (NCT03430531)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block5.33

[back to top]

"Percentage of Participants Who Noted Improved or Much Improved as Assessed by the Participant Using the GAIS in the Treatment Group"

The participant assessed the aesthetic improvement of the nose using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=much improved, 1=improved, 0=no change, -1=worse and -2=much worse. The percentage of participants who assess themselves as 2=much improved or 1=improved is reported. (NCT03430986)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® With Lidocaine91.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) in the Control Period

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or a participant using an investigational drug, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. (NCT03430986)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
No-treatment Control17
JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® With Lidocaine43

[back to top]

"Percentage of Participants Where the Evaluating Investigator Noted Improved or Much Improved Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)"

The Evaluating Investigator assessed the aesthetic improvement of the nose using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=much improved, 1=improved, 0=no change, -1=worse and -2=much worse. The percentage of participants who the Evaluating Investigator assessed as 2=much improved or 1=improved is reported. (NCT03430986)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
No-treatment Control18.8
JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® With Lidocaine87.2

[back to top]

"Percentage of Participants Who Noted Satisfied or Very Satisfied With Treatment Outcome on the Nose Satisfaction Scale (NSS) in the Treatment Group"

The participant used the 5-point NSS to assess the treatment outcome of the nose where: +2=very satisfied, +1=satisfied, 0=neutral (neither satisfied or dissatisfied), -1=dissatisfied and -2= very dissatisfied. The percentage of participants who assessed themselves as +2=Very Satisfied or +1=Satisfied is reported. (NCT03430986)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® With Lidocaine95.7

[back to top]

Volume Change From Baseline in the Nose Area

Volume of the nose was calculated by digital analysis of each participant's 3-dimensional (3D) images. A mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used for analysis. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. An analysis model was created by Canfield Scientific, only volume changes are available. Actual Baseline values are not available. (NCT03430986)
Timeframe: Baseline (Last value prior to treatment for the treatment group and last value prior to randomization for control group) to Week 24

Interventioncubic centimeters (cc) (Least Squares Mean)
No-treatment Control-0.005
JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® With Lidocaine2.032

[back to top]

Change of Severity of Headache

Mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Scores from both months were avareged. Minimum=0 Maximum=10. Lower scores mean a better outcome (NCT03435185)
Timeframe: Patients were followed up for 2 months from baseline after first injection.

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Blockade Group5.5
Placebo Group7.4

[back to top]

Change of Frequency of Headache

Number of headache days in a month. Scores from both months were averaged. Minimum=0 Maximum=30. Lower scores mean a better outcome. (NCT03435185)
Timeframe: Patients were followed up from baseline to 2 months after first injection.

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Blockade Group5.3
Placebo Group7.5

[back to top]

Number of Hospital Days

"The number of days the patient was hospitalized post injury or up to 30 days (whichever is sooner). Zero-inflated models are presented as estimated marginal means (95% Credible Interval). The data reported as mean actually refers to marginal mean, and the data reported as 95% Confidence Interval actually refers to a 95% Credible Interval." (NCT03472469)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionhospital days (Mean)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm4.97
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm5.12

[back to top]

Number of Intensive Care Unti (ICU) Days

"The number of days the patient was in the ICU post injury or up to 30 days (whichever is sooner). Zero-inflated models are presented as estimated marginal means (95% Credible Interval). The data reported as mean actually refers to marginal mean, and the data reported as 95% Confidence Interval actually refers to a 95% Credible Interval." (NCT03472469)
Timeframe: 30 days

InterventionICU days (Mean)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm0.21
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm0.21

[back to top]

Number of Participants Discharged From the Hospital With an Opioid Prescription

(NCT03472469)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm527
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm476

[back to top]

Opioid Use Per Day

Opioid use per day is calculated by tallying the dose equivalency of all opioids received and dividing by the number of days hospitalized. Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per day are reported. (NCT03472469)
Timeframe: until discharge from hospital or 30 days post admission (whichever is sooner)

InterventionMME per day (Median)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm48
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm34

[back to top]

Overall Costs

the costs associated with the overall hospitalization or the first 30 days (whichever is sooner) related to post trauma care and complications incurred. (NCT03472469)
Timeframe: until discharge from hospital or 30 days post admission (whichever is sooner)

Interventiondollars (Median)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm20093
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm19561

[back to top]

Pain as Assessed by Score on the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS)

An average will be calculated of the daily score on the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS). BPS score ranges from 3-12, with higher scores indicating worse pain. This assessment is used in non-verbal participants. (NCT03472469)
Timeframe: until discharge from hospital or 30 days post admission (whichever is sooner)

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm2.5
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm2.3

[back to top]

Pain as Assessed by Score on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

An average will be calculated of the daily numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain (0=no pain, 10=worst pain). This assessment is used in verbal participants. (NCT03472469)
Timeframe: until discharge from hospital or 30 days post admission (whichever is sooner)

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm3.3
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm3.3

[back to top]

Pharmacy Costs

The costs of the pain medications given during the specified time period. (NCT03472469)
Timeframe: until discharge from hospital or 30 days post admission (whichever is sooner)

Interventiondollars (Median)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm507
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm397

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Ventilator Days

"The number of days the patient on a ventilator post injury or up to 30 days (whichever is sooner). Zero-inflated models are presented as estimated marginal means (95% Credible Interval). The data reported as mean actually refers to marginal mean, and the data reported as 95% Confidence Interval actually refers to a 95% Credible Interval." (NCT03472469)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionventilator days (Mean)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm0.08
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm0.06

[back to top]

48-hour Postoperative Pain Scores

"To determine if lidocaine patch is superior to placebo as an adjunctive therapy for acute postoperative pain. Average pain score in women who have undergone cesarean delivery at 48 hours postoperatively. Measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a scale which measures pain from 0 to 100 with 0=no pain and 100=the worst pain you have ever felt." (NCT03500211)
Timeframe: Postoperative (48 hours)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidoderm 5% Topical Patch24.8
Sham Topical Patch29.6

[back to top]

36-hour Postoperative Pain Scores

"To determine if lidocaine patch is superior to placebo as an adjunctive therapy for acute postoperative pain. Average pain score in women who have undergone cesarean delivery at 36 hours postoperatively. Measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a scale which measures pain from 0 to 100 with 0=no pain and 100=the worst pain you have ever felt." (NCT03500211)
Timeframe: Postoperative (36 hours)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidoderm 5% Topical Patch37.3
Sham Topical Patch43.0

[back to top]

24-hour Postoperative Pain Scores

"To determine if lidocaine patch is superior to placebo as an adjunctive therapy for acute postoperative pain. Average pain score in women who have undergone cesarean delivery at 24 hours postoperatively. Measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a scale which measures pain from 0 to 100 with 0=no pain and 100=the worst pain you have ever felt." (NCT03500211)
Timeframe: Postoperative (24 hours)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidoderm 5% Topical Patch34.1
Sham Topical Patch32.9

[back to top]

12-hour Postoperative Pain Scores

"To determine if lidocaine patch is superior to placebo as an adjunctive therapy for acute postoperative pain. Average pain score in women who have undergone cesarean delivery at 12 hours postoperatively. Measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a scale which measures pain from 0 to 100 with 0=no pain and 100=the worst pain you have ever felt." (NCT03500211)
Timeframe: Postoperative (12 hours)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidoderm 5% Topical Patch33.5
Sham Topical Patch28.8

[back to top]

5-days Postoperative Narcotic Use

To determine if narcotic use changes when patients use lidocaine patches by counting amount and frequency of narcotic use over admission. Average number of 5 mg oxycodone pills used in women who have undergone cesarean delivery assessed through questionnaire at 5 days postoperatively. (NCT03500211)
Timeframe: Postoperative (5 days)

Interventionpills (Mean)
Lidoderm 5% Topical Patch8.6
Sham Topical Patch8.3

[back to top]

Total Propofol Administered

total propofol administered (mg/kg) (NCT03513757)
Timeframe: up to 90 minutes

Interventionmg/kg (Median)
Propofol10.6
Propofol Dexmedetomidine3.0

[back to top]

Delirium

Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) score greater than 12 as defined by Sikich and Lerman. 0 = no delirium, 20 = worst possible delirium; 5 categories scored from 0-4 additive for a maximum score of 20. Categories 1-3 are scored the same and categories ar scored inversely as described. 1. Child makes contact with caregiver, 2. child's actions are purposeful, 3. child is aware of his surroundings. For each of these category, score 0 for extremely, 1 for very much, 2 for quite a bit, 3 for just a little, 4 for not at all. The other 2 categories 4. Child is restless and 5 Child is inconsolable are scored as 0 for not at all, 1 for just a little, 2 for quite a bit, 3 for very much, 4 for extremely (NCT03513757)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Propofol0
Propofol Dexmedetomidine0

[back to top]

Dexmedetomidine Dose

dexmedetomidine dose (mcg/kg) (NCT03513757)
Timeframe: up to 90 minutes

Interventionmcg/kg (Median)
Propofol0
Propofol Dexmedetomidine0.70

[back to top]

Discharge Ready

minutes from completion of scan to discharge ready (NCT03513757)
Timeframe: up to 2 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Propofol40
Propofol Dexmedetomidine17

[back to top]

Efficiency of Propofol Dexmedetomidine Sedation Compared With Propofol Infusion

Time (minutes) from anesthesia start to readiness for discharge from the department to home or clinic. (NCT03513757)
Timeframe: through study completion, an average of 2 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Propofol98
Propofol Dexmedetomidine77

[back to top]

Eye Opening

minutes from completion of scan to spontaneous eye opening (NCT03513757)
Timeframe: up to 90 minutes

Interventionminutes (Median)
Propofol28
Propofol Dexmedetomidine3

[back to top]

Glycopyrrolate Dose

glycopyrrolate dose (mcg/kg) (NCT03513757)
Timeframe: 5 minutes

Interventionmcg/kg (Median)
Propofol0
Propofol Dexmedetomidine4.2

[back to top]

Irritability

behavior deemed inappropriate and a deviation from child's normal though parental observation obtained through follow-up phone call (NCT03513757)
Timeframe: up to 48 hours

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Propofol3
Propofol Dexmedetomidine0

[back to top]

Lidocaine Dose

lidocaine dose (mg/kg) (NCT03513757)
Timeframe: up to 90 minutes

Interventionmg/kg (Median)
Propofol1.00
Propofol Dexmedetomidine1.00

[back to top]

Nitrous Oxide

documentation of use (NCT03513757)
Timeframe: up to 10 minutes

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Propofol18
Propofol Dexmedetomidine17

[back to top]

Oral/Enteral Intake

minutes from completion of scan to oral/enteral intake (NCT03513757)
Timeframe: up to 2 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Propofol33
Propofol Dexmedetomidine14

[back to top]

Sevoflurane

sevoflurane induction time of 5 minutes (NCT03513757)
Timeframe: sevoflurane induction time up to 10 minutes

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Propofol18
Propofol Dexmedetomidine17

[back to top]

Sleep Pattern

parental observation of deviation from child's normal habit obtained through follow-up phone call (NCT03513757)
Timeframe: up to 48 hours

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Propofol3
Propofol Dexmedetomidine2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An Adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or a participant using an investigational drug, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. A TEAE is an AE that occurred after receiving the first dose of study device or study injection or an AE present prior to first dose but increased in severity during the Treatment Period. (NCT03519204)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 12 Post Treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
No-treatment Control (Control Period)3
JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA® XC With Lidocaine (All Treated)74

[back to top]

Procedural Pain Score

Procedural pain (pain during injection) was evaluated by the participant using an 11-point scale, where: 0=No pain to 10=Worst pain imaginable. Participants recorded procedural pain in safety diary for 30 days after initial treatment. Number analyzed is the number of participants with safety diary data available for analysis. (NCT03519204)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after initial treatment with JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA® XC with Lidocaine

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treated Control2.6
JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA® XC With Lidocaine2.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Lip Volume

Overall lip volume was measured by 3-dimensional (3D) photography images. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at Baseline and Month 3. (NCT03519204)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 3 Post Treatment ( JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA® XC with Lidocaine arm) or Month 3 Post Randomization (No-treatment Control arm)

Interventioncubic centimeters (cc) (Median)
No-treatment Control0.03990
JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA® XC With Lidocaine0.45150

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Injection Site Responses (ISRs)

ISRs were recorded by the participant in a safety diary for 30 days after each treatment and were summarized by treatment (initial and touch-up). ISRs were defined as redness, pain after injection, tenderness to touch, firmness, swelling, lumps/bumps, bruising, itching and discoloration. Number analyzed is the number of participants with safety diary data available for analysis. (NCT03519204)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after each treatment with JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA® XC with Lidocaine

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Initial TreatmentTouch-up Treatment
JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA® XC With Lidocaine12326
Treated Control266

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a ≥1-point Increase (Improvement) on the Evaluating Investigator's (EI's) Assessed 5-point Lip Fullness Scale (LFS)

The investigator assessed the participant's lip fullness using the 5-point LFS where: 0=Minimal (Flat or nearly flat contour, minimal red lip show), 1=Mild (Some red lip show; no lower lip pout), 2=Moderate (Moderate red lip show with slight lower lip pout), 3=Marked (Significant red lip show and lower lip pout), and 4=Very Marked (Very significant red lip show, lower lip pout, and upper lip pout). Improvement was defined as a ≥1-point increase in fullness from Baseline. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at Baseline and Month 3. (NCT03519204)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 3 Post Last Treatment (JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA® XC with Lidocaine arm) or Month 3 Post Randomization (No-treatment Control arm)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
No-treatment Control0
JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA® XC With Lidocaine84.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a ≥1-point Increase (Improvement) Based on the Participant's Assessed 5-point LFS

Lip fullness was assessed by the participant using the 5-point LFS where: 0=Minimal (Flat or nearly flat contour, minimal red lip show), 1=Mild (Some red lip show; no lower lip pout), 2=Moderate (Moderate red lip show with slight lower lip pout), 3=Marked (Significant red lip show and lower lip pout), and 4=Very Marked (Very significant red lip show, lower lip pout, and upper lip pout). Improvement was defined as a ≥1-point increase in fullness from Baseline. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at Baseline and Month 3. (NCT03519204)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 3 Post Treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA® XC With Lidocaine65.0

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Lip Surface Area

Lips surface area was measured by 3D photography images. A positive percentage change from Baseline indicates improvement. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at Baseline and Month 3. (NCT03519204)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 3 Post Treatment ( JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA® XC with Lidocaine arm) or Month 3 Post Randomization (No-treatment Control arm)

Interventionpercentage change in lip surface area (Median)
No-treatment Control-0.11
JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA® XC With Lidocaine12.16

[back to top]

Falls

rate of falls (NCT03540030)
Timeframe: 2 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
YesNoUnknown
Non-Opioid Intervention5300
Observational1272

[back to top]

Falls

rate of falls (NCT03540030)
Timeframe: 2 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
YesNoUnknown
Non-Opioid Intervention4274
Observational4242

[back to top]

Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12©) Physical Health Subscore, and Mental Health Subscore

quality of life using VR-12 subscores. Physical Health (PCS) subscore and Mental Health (MCS) subscore, not summed. Range reported in weighted units. Physical Health subscore: 1 point increase in PCS is associated with 6% lower total health care expenditures, 5% lower pharmacy expenditures, 9% lower rate of hospital inpatient visits, 4% lower rate of medical provider visits, 5% lower rate of hospital outpatient visits. Mental Health sub score a 1 point increase in MCS is associated with 7% lower total health care expenditures, 4% lower pharmacy expenditures, 15% lower rate of hospital inpatient visits, and 4% lower rate of medical provider visits. Both PCS/MCS are score 0-100 with 100 indicating the highest level of health. (NCT03540030)
Timeframe: 2 Weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
PCSMCS
Non-Opioid Intervention35.059.1
Observational36.756.3

[back to top]

Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12©) Physical Health Subscore, and Mental Health Subscore

quality of life using VR-12 subscores. Physical Health (PCS) subscore and Mental Health (MCS) subscore, not summed. Range reported in weighted units. Physical Health subscore: 1 point increase in PCS is associated with 6% lower total health care expenditures, 5% lower pharmacy expenditures, 9% lower rate of hospital inpatient visits, 4% lower rate of medical provider visits, 5% lower rate of hospital outpatient visits. Mental Health sub score a 1 point increase in MCS is associated with 7% lower total health care expenditures, 4% lower pharmacy expenditures, 15% lower rate of hospital inpatient visits, and 4% lower rate of medical provider visits. Both PCS/MCS are score 0-100 with 100 indicating the highest level of health. (NCT03540030)
Timeframe: 2 Months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
PCSMCS
Non-Opioid Intervention40.360.8
Observational38.458.7

[back to top]

Additional Post Op Pain

post-operative pain: measured on a 0 (no pain) -10 (worst) numeric rating scale (NRS) at 6hrs, 12hrs, 2 weeks, and 2 months. A score of 0(no pain) is preferable to 10(worst possible pain) (NCT03540030)
Timeframe: 6hrs, 12hrs, 2weeks, 2 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
6 Hrs12 hrs2 weeks2 months
Non-Opioid Intervention0.000.820
Observational241.30.7

[back to top]

ASES

American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score for pain and function. Range 0-100. Low score = worse shoulder condition. Function, disability, and pain subscores (all ranges 0-50), and are summed for total ASES score. (NCT03540030)
Timeframe: 2 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Observational54.3
Non-Opioid Intervention54.2

[back to top]

Morphine Use

Morphine milli-equivalents In-hospital post-operative. Continuous scale of MME, no defined better/worse. Measured as number and dose of medications taken. For example, if the patient received an opioid, the drug and dose was recorded and converted to MME. A time frame of when to assess opioid use in-hospital post-operative was not used but was a continuous monitor for rescue opioid from in-hospital post-operative through discharge. (NCT03540030)
Timeframe: In-hospital Stay

InterventionMorphine milli-equivalents (Median)
Observational45.0
Non-Opioid Intervention19.0

[back to top]

Post Op Pain

Pain at patient discharge or 24-hours, whichever comes first - measured on a 0 (no pain) -10 (worst possible pain) numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0(no pain) is preferable to 10(worst possible pain) (NCT03540030)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Observational3.0
Non-Opioid Intervention2.0

[back to top]

Simple Shoulder Test

Simple Shoulder Test (SST) activity score. Range 0-12. 0 = worse activity score. (NCT03540030)
Timeframe: 2 Months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Observational6
Non-Opioid Intervention6

[back to top]

Simple Shoulder Test

Simple Shoulder Test (SST) activity score. Range 0-12. 0 = worse activity score. (NCT03540030)
Timeframe: 2 Weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Observational2.0
Non-Opioid Intervention2.0

[back to top]

Pain Satisfaction

Satisfaction with overall pain using Numeric Pain Rating (NRS) scale. yes, no. No being better than yes. (NCT03540030)
Timeframe: 2 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
YesNoUnknown
Non-Opioid Intervention3410
Observational2712

[back to top]

Constipation

rate of constipation (NCT03540030)
Timeframe: 2 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
YesNoUnknown
Non-Opioid Intervention4274
Observational7212

[back to top]

Constipation

rate of constipation (NCT03540030)
Timeframe: 2 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
YesNoUnknown
Non-Opioid Intervention13220
Observational1992

[back to top]

Pain Satisfaction

Satisfaction with overall pain using Numeric Pain Rating (NRS) scale. yes, no. No being better than yes. (NCT03540030)
Timeframe: 2 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
YesNoUnknown
Non-Opioid Intervention2924
Observational2352

[back to top]

Nausea

rate of nausea (NCT03540030)
Timeframe: 2 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
YesNoUnknown
Non-Opioid Intervention1340
Observational5232

[back to top]

Nausea

rate of nausea (NCT03540030)
Timeframe: 2 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
YesNoUnknown
Non-Opioid Intervention1300
Observational0282

[back to top]

Mean Pain Scores Following Injection

"Perceived pain on injection, self-reported verbally using a Likert scale from 1-10, with lower numbers corresponding to less pain (1 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable). Lower scores reflect a lesser degree of pain." (NCT03562481)
Timeframe: Within 10 minutes of injection

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Buffered Anesthetic3.0
Unbuffered Anesthetic3.3

[back to top]

Mean Time to Baseline Lip Sensation

Response in minutes from injection to when lip is no longer numb, as self reported by patient. (NCT03562481)
Timeframe: Within 24 hours following injection

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Buffered Anesthetic218
Unbuffered Anesthetic241

[back to top]

Average Serum Lidocaine Concentration at 15 Minutes Post Injection

Blood Lidocaine Level (mcg/mL) as measured in 10cc venous blood, taken 15 minutes following injection. Blood assayed for serum lidocaine levels with a Sciex TripleTOF liquid chromatography- mass spectrometry (LC-MS) equipped with a C18 Hypersil (10mm x 2.1mm, 3.0μm). (NCT03562481)
Timeframe: One blood draw taken 15 minutes following injection

Interventionmcg/ml (Mean)
Buffered Anesthetic243.5
Unbuffered Anesthetic600.2

[back to top]

Mean Time to Lower Lip Numbness Following Injection

Time in minutes beginning immediately following injection to patient-reported lip numbness (NCT03562481)
Timeframe: Up to 30 minutes following injection

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Buffered Anesthetic3.4
Unbuffered Anesthetic4.4

[back to top] [back to top]

Responder Rate According to the Merz Jawline Assessment Scale (MJAS)

MJAS was a 5-point scale (0-4 scores; higher scores mean worse outcome). Responder rate was defined as percentage of participants with a greater than or equal to (>=) 1-point improvement. (NCT03583359)
Timeframe: At Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment With Radiesse (+)75.6
Control/Delayed Treatment With Radiesse (+)8.8

[back to top]

Responder Rate According to the MJAS as Assessed by Independent Panel Reviewers (IPRs)

MJAS was a 5-point scale (0-4 scores; higher scores mean worse outcome). Responder rate was defined as percentage of participants with a >=1-point improvement. (NCT03583359)
Timeframe: At Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment With Radiesse (+)47.7
Control/Delayed Treatment With Radiesse (+)8.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Face-Q Satisfaction

The participant assessed satisfaction using the Face-Q Satisfaction with Lower Face and Jawline module (Rasch transformed score 0-100; higher scores mean better outcome). (NCT03583359)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Treatment With Radiesse (+)269.8
Control/Delayed Treatment With Radiesse (+)-9.4

[back to top]

Mean Total Amount of Intervention (Lidocaine or Surgilube) Used

The mean total amount of intervention used as measured by milligrams (mg) (NCT03595449)
Timeframe: Through completion of Mohs surgery, approximately one day

Interventionmg (Mean)
Lidocaine Jelly28.1
Surgilube24.4

[back to top]

Mean Change in Patient Perception of Pain Score

"The mean change of total pain score of patient perception of pain. As measured by the question Rate the pain of your nose from 0 to 10. 0 being no pain, 10 being the worst pain of your life." (NCT03595449)
Timeframe: baseline to stage 1 of Mohs surgery, approximately one hour

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine Jelly0.5
Surgilube0.3

[back to top]

Pain Outcome: Visual Analog Scale

Assessed using the visual analog scale (0-10 scale). Zero indicates no pain, 10 indicates worst pain ever. (NCT03630198)
Timeframe: Assessed 1 minute after the injection (in clinic)

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Corticosteroid With Lidocaine5.4
Corticosteroid With Normal Saline2.7

[back to top]

Pain Outcome: Visual Analog Scale

Assessed using the visual analog scale (0-10 scale). Zero indicates no pain, 10 indicates worst pain ever. (NCT03630198)
Timeframe: Assessed at 6 hours and 24 hours after injection

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Pain (6 hour)Pain (24 hour)
Corticosteroid With Lidocaine0.90
Corticosteroid With Normal Saline0.10

[back to top]

Pain With Uterine Aspiration

Distance (mm) from the left of the 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (reflecting magnitude of pain) recorded immediately after uterine aspiration. Pain will be assessed using a 100 mm visual analogue scale with the anchors 0 = none, 100 mm = worst imaginable. (NCT03636451)
Timeframe: Once during the procedure on the day of recruitment, approximately 1 minute. During procedure immediately after uterine aspiration.

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
20cc 1% Lidocaine With 2 Units of Vasopressin Paracervical Block46
40cc Buffered 0.5% Lidocaine With 2 Units of Vasopressin Paracervical Block58

[back to top]

Pain With Cervical Dilation

Distance (mm) from the left of the 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (reflecting magnitude of pain) recorded at time of cervical dilation. Pain will be assessed using a 100 mm visual analogue scale with the anchors 0 = none, 100 mm = worst imaginable. (NCT03636451)
Timeframe: Once during the procedure on the day of recruitment, approximately one minute. During procedure at time of cervical dilation.

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
20cc 1% Lidocaine With 2 Units of Vasopressin Paracervical Block52
40cc Buffered 0.5% Lidocaine With 2 Units of Vasopressin Paracervical Block45

[back to top]

Pain 10 Minutes Post Procedure

Distance (mm) from the left of the 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (reflecting magnitude of pain) recorded 10 minutes after the completion of the procedure. Pain will be assessed using a 100 mm visual analogue scale with the anchors 0 = none, 100 mm = worst imaginable. (NCT03636451)
Timeframe: Once 10 minutes after the procedure on the day of recruitment, approximately one minute.

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
20cc 1% Lidocaine With 2 Units of Vasopressin Paracervical Block26
40cc Buffered 0.5% Lidocaine With 2 Units of Vasopressin Paracervical Block11

[back to top]

Overall Pain

Distance (mm) from the left of the 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (reflecting magnitude of pain) recorded after the procedure reflecting the overall pain felt during the procedure. Pain will be assessed using a 100 mm visual analogue scale with the anchors 0 = none, 100 mm = worst imaginable. (NCT03636451)
Timeframe: Once 10 minutes after the procedure on the day of recruitment, approximately one minute.

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
20cc 1% Lidocaine With 2 Units of Vasopressin Paracervical Block57
40cc Buffered 0.5% Lidocaine With 2 Units of Vasopressin Paracervical Block56

[back to top]

Responder Rate for Cheek Fullness Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the Merz Upper Cheek Fullness Scale (MUCFS) at Week 12/16 (Depending on Touch-up)

The MUCFS was used to assess the severity of volume loss of upper cheeks. The assessment was performed separately for the left and the right cheek by the blinded rater and the treating investigator (at baseline only prior to SMD injection) by live rating. MUCFS was a 5 point scale ranging as: 0 (full upper cheek), 1 (mildly sunken upper cheek), 2 (moderately sunken upper cheek), 3 (severely sunken upper cheek), 4 (very severely sunken upper cheek). Responders rate was defined as percentage of participants who achieved improvement of >=1 point in both cheeks (left and right) from Day 1 pre-injection to Week 12/16 (depending on touch-up). As planned, the cumulative data was collected for Week 12 or Week 16 based on the touch-up. (NCT03650387)
Timeframe: At Week 12 (for participants with no touch-up) or Week 16 (for participants with touch-up)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss81.9

[back to top]

Responder Rate for Marionette Lines Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the Merz Marionette Lines Scale (MMLS) at Week 12/16 (Depending on Touch-up)

The MMLS was used to assess the severity of marionette lines. The assessment was performed separately for the left and the right marionette line by the blinded rater and the treating investigator (at baseline only prior to SMD injection) by live rating. MMLS was a 5 point scale ranging as: 0 (no lines), 1 (mild lines), 2 (moderate lines), 3 (severe lines), 4 (very severe lines). Responders rate was defined as percentage of participants who achieved improvement of >=1 point in both marionette lines (left and right) from Day 1 pre-injection to Week 12/16 (depending on touch-up). As planned, the cumulative data was collected for Week 12 or Week 16 based on the touch-up. (NCT03650387)
Timeframe: At Week 12 (for participants with no touch-up) or Week 16 (for participants with touch-up)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines88.7

[back to top]

Responder Rate for Nasolabial Folds Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the Merz Nasolabial Folds Scale (MNLFS) at Week 12/16 (Depending on Touch-up)

The MNLFS was used to assess the severity of nasolabial folds. The assessment was performed separately for the left and the right nasolabial fold by the blinded rater and the treating investigator (at baseline only prior to SMD injection) by live rating. MNLFS was a 5 point scale ranging as: 0 (no folds), 1 (mild folds), 2 (moderate folds), 3 (severe folds), 4 (very severe folds). Responders rate was defined as percentage of participants who achieved improvement of greater than or equal to (>=) 1 point in both folds (left and right) from Day 1 pre-injection to Week 12/16 (depending on touch-up). As planned, the cumulative data was collected for Week 12 or Week 16 based on the touch-up. (NCT03650387)
Timeframe: At Week 12 (for participants with no touch-up) or Week 16 (for participants with touch-up)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds93.6

[back to top]

Responder Rate for Cheek Fullness Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the MUCFS at Week 4 (Prior to Optional Touch-up), at Week 24/28, at Week 48/52, and at Week 72/76 (Depending on Touch-up)

The MUCFS was used to assess the severity of volume loss of upper cheeks. The assessment was performed separately for the left and the right cheek by the blinded rater and the treating investigator (at baseline only prior to SMD injection) by live rating. MUCFS was based on 5 point scale ranging from: 0 (full upper cheek), 1 (mildly sunken upper cheek), 2 (moderately sunken upper cheek), 3 (severely sunken upper cheek), 4 (very severely sunken upper cheek). Responders rate was defined as percentage of participants who achieved improvement of >=1 point in both cheeks (left and right) from Day 1 pre-injection to Week 4, Week 24/28, Week 48/52, and Week 72/76 (depending on touch-up). As planned, the cumulative data was collected for Week 24 or 28, Week 48 or 52, and Week 72 or 76 based on the touch-up. (NCT03650387)
Timeframe: At Week 4 (prior to optional touch-up); at Weeks 24, 48 and 72 (for participants with no touch-up) or at Weeks 28, 52 and 76 (for participants with touch-up)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 24/28 (Depending Upon Touch-up)Week 48/52 (Depending Upon Touch-up)Week 72/76 (Depending Upon Touch-up)
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss84.672.951.630.9

[back to top]

Responder Rate for Marionette Lines Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the MMLS at Week 4 (Prior to Optional Touch-up), at Week 24/28, at Week 48/52, and at Week 72/76 (Depending on Touch-up)

The MMLS was to be used to assess the severity of marionette lines. The assessment was performed separately for the left and the right marionette line by the blinded rater and the treating investigator (at baseline only prior to SMD injection) by live rating. MMLS was a 5 point scale ranging from: 0 (no lines), 1 (mild lines), 2 (moderate lines), 3 (severe lines), 4 (very severe lines). Responders rate was defined as percentage of participants who achieved improvement of >=1 point in both marionette lines (left and right) from Day 1 pre-injection to Week 4, Week 24/28, Week 48/52, and Week 72/76 (depending on touch-up). As planned, the cumulative data was collected for Week 24 or 28, Week 48 or 52, and Week 72 or 76 based on the touch-up. (NCT03650387)
Timeframe: At Week 4 (prior to optional touch-up); and at Weeks 24, 48 and 72 (for participants with no touch-up) or at Weeks 28, 52 and 76 (for participants with touch-up)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 24/28 (Depending Upon Touch-up)Week 48/52 (Depending Upon Touch-up)Week 72/76 (Depending Upon Touch-up)
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines86.671.635.616.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

(NCT03650387)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 72 (for participants with no touch-up) or Week 76 (for participants with touch-up)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds139
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines133
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss129
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants142

[back to top]

Responder Rate for Nasolabial Folds Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the MNLFS at Week 4 (Prior to Optional Touch-up), at Week 24/28, at Week 48/52, and at Week 72/76 (Depending on Touch-up)

The MNLFS was used to assess the severity of nasolabial folds. The assessment was performed separately for the left and the right nasolabial fold by the blinded rater and the treating investigator (at baseline only prior to SMD injection) by live rating. MNLFS was a 5 point scale ranging as: 0 (no folds), 1 (mild folds), 2 (moderate folds), 3 (severe folds), 4 (very severe folds). Responders rate was defined as percentage of participants who achieved improvement of >=1 point in both folds (left and right) from Day 1 pre-injection to Week 4, Week 24/28, Week 48/52, and Week 72/76 (depending on touch-up). As planned, the cumulative data was collected for Week 24 or 28, Week 48 or 52, and Week 72 or 76 based on the touch-up. (NCT03650387)
Timeframe: At Week 4 (prior to optional touch-up); at Weeks 24, 48 and 72 (for participants with no touch-up) or at Weeks 28, 52 and 76 (for participants with touch-up)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 24/28 (Depending Upon Touch-up)Week 48/52 (Depending Upon Touch-up)Week 72/76 (Depending Upon Touch-up)
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds87.678.241.623.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants Based on Treating Investigator's Evaluation of the Global Aesthetic Improvement on the iGAIS at Week 4 (Prior to Optional Touch-up), Week 12/16, Week 24/28, Week 48/52, and Week 72/76 (Depending on Touch-up Performed)

The Investigator's Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (iGAIS) was used to assess aesthetic improvement in the participants by the treating investigator by live rating using baseline photographs for comparison. The treating investigator was asked: 'Based on your clinical experience, what is your overall impression of change of the participant's aesthetic result due to treatment, compared to the condition before the first treatment (baseline)? Please check the one option that best fits your overall impression of change based on your comparison of the baseline visit photographs.' Rating was based on 7 point rating scale ranging from: +3 (very much improved), +2 (much improved), +1 (improved), 0 (no change), -1 (worse), -2 (much worse), -3 (very much worse). As planned, the cumulative data was collected at Week 4 (prior to optional touch-up), Week 12 or 16, Week 24 or 28, Week 48 or 52, and Week 72 or 76 based on the touch-up. (NCT03650387)
Timeframe: At Week 4 (prior to optional touch-up); at Weeks 12, 24, 48 and 72 (for participants with no touch-up) or at Weeks 16, 28, 52 and 76 (for participants with touch-up)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 472383289Week 472383294Week 472383292Week 472383293Week 12/16 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383289Week 12/16 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383292Week 12/16 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383293Week 12/16 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383294Week 24/28 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383289Week 24/28 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383293Week 24/28 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383294Week 24/28 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383292Week 48/52 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383292Week 48/52 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383293Week 48/52 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383289Week 48/52 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383294Week 72/76 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383289Week 72/76 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383292Week 72/76 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383293Week 72/76 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383294
ImprovedNo ChangeWorseMuch WorseVery Much WorseVery Much ImprovedMuch Improved
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines23
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss24
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants26
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines102
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss100
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants107
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds67
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines65
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss60
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants68
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds4
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines3
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss3
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants4
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds32
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines30
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss30
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants32
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds115
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines113
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss108
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants118
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds43
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines39
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss40
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants44
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds7
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines7
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss5
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants7
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds0
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines0
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss0
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds6
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines4
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss6
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds86
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines87
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss85
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants89
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds76
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines70
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss68
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants77
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds24
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines24
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss19
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants24
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds1
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss1
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds13
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines12
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss13
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants13
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds106
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines105
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants109
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds58
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines55
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss51
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants59
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines1
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants1
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants0
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines6
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants6
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds64
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines62
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss61
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants65
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds88
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines84
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss80
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants90

[back to top]

Number of Participants Based on Participant's Evaluation of the Global Aesthetic Improvement on the sGAIS at Week 4 (Prior to Optional Touch-up), Week 12/16, Week 24/28, Week 48/52, and Week 72/76 (Depending on Touch-up Performed)

The Subject's Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (sGAIS) was used to assess aesthetic improvement in the participants by the participant by live rating using baseline photographs for comparison. The participant was asked: 'What is your overall impression of change of your aesthetic result due to treatment, compared to the condition before the injection? Please tick the one option that best fits your overall impression of change based on your comparison of the baseline visit photographs.' Rating based on 7 point rating scale ranging from: +3 (very much improved), +2 (much improved), +1 (improved), 0 (no change), -1 (worse), -2 (much worse), -3 (very much worse). As planned, the cumulative data was collected at Week 4 (prior to optional touch-up), Week 12 or 16, Week 24 or 28, Week 48 or 52, and Week 72 or 76 based on the touch-up. (NCT03650387)
Timeframe: At Week 4 (prior to optional touch-up); at Weeks 12, 24, 48 and 72 (for participants with no touch-up) or at Weeks 16, 28, 52 and 76 (for participants with touch-up)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 472383292Week 472383295Week 472383293Week 472383294Week 12/16 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383293Week 12/16 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383292Week 12/16 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383295Week 12/16 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383294Week 24/28 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383295Week 24/28 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383292Week 24/28 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383293Week 24/28 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383294Week 48/52 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383292Week 48/52 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383295Week 48/52 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383293Week 48/52 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383294Week 72/76 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383292Week 72/76 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383295Week 72/76 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383293Week 72/76 (Depending Upon Touch-up)72383294
Much ImprovedVery Much ImprovedImprovedNo ChangeWorseMuch WorseVery Much Worse
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds9
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines7
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss9
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants9
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds71
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines70
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss71
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants75
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds102
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines98
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss89
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants102
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds18
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines17
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss17
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants18
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines19
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants20
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds84
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines80
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss80
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants87
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds80
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines78
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss73
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants81
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines10
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss8
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds8
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines8
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss7
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants8
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines59
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds90
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines87
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss86
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants92
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds27
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines26
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss22
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants27
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds5
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines4
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss5
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants5
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines1
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines0
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds26
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines24
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss23
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants26
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds87
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines84
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss82
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants89
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds47
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines46
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss43
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants49
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds16
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines16
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss15
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants16
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines2
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds1
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss1
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants1
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds20
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines21
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss20
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants21
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds63
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines60
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss57
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds61
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines57
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss56
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants63
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds11
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Marionette Lines11
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss11
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants11
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds2
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss2
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants2
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Nasolabial Folds0
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: Cheek Volume Loss0
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine: All Participants0

[back to top]

Provider's Opinion of Subject Tolerance as Measured by a Scale

"provider-reported measure of how well they believe the patient tolerated the procedure~title: Overall, how well did the subject tolerate the procedure today? min: 0 (well tolerated) max: 100 (poorly tolerated)" (NCT03654417)
Timeframe: Up to 30 minutes after the procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (mm) (Median)
EMLA3
Lidocaine15

[back to top]

Pain During Biopsy as Measured by a Pain Scale

"self-reported level of pain following the biopsy~title: Please slide the tab along the line below to indicate pain in the area of your vulva (external genitalia) during biopsy min: 0 (no pain) max: 100 (worst pain imaginable)" (NCT03654417)
Timeframe: No more than 5 minutes after receiving the biopsy

Interventionunits on a scale (mm) (Median)
EMLA6
Lidocaine3

[back to top]

Baseline Vulvar Pain

self-reported level of vulvar pain immediately prior to the start of the procedure title: Please slide the tab along the line below to indicate pain in the area of your vulva (external genitalia) during biopsy min: 0 (no pain) max: 100 (worst pain imaginable) (NCT03654417)
Timeframe: no more than 30 minutes prior to procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (mm) (Median)
EMLA0.0
Lidocaine0.0

[back to top]

Anxiety Before the Procedure as Measured by an Anxiety Scale

"self-reported level of anxiety immediately prior to the start of the procedure~title: Slide the tab along the line below to indicate how nervous you feel about the procedure you are about to have min: 0 (not nervous) max: 100 (very nervous)" (NCT03654417)
Timeframe: No more than 30 minutes before the procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (mm) (Median)
EMLA19
Lidocaine31.5

[back to top]

Acceptance of the Procedure as Measured by a Satisfaction Scale

"self-reported acceptance of the procedure meant to assess a patient's acceptability through a scale~title: Please slide the tab along the line below to indicate, overall, how acceptable the procedure performed today was min: 0 (completely acceptable) max: 100 (not at all acceptable)" (NCT03654417)
Timeframe: up to 30 minutes after the procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (mm) (Median)
EMLA0
Lidocaine10.5

[back to top]

Tolerance of Procedure as Measured by a Satisfaction Scale

"self-reported tolerance of the procedure meant to assess a patient's tolerance through a scale~Title: Please slide the tab along the line below to indicate, overall, how you would rate the experience of your biopsy procedure today Min: 0 (I could easily handle having this procedure again) Max: 100 (I could never have this procedure done again)" (NCT03654417)
Timeframe: Up to 30 minutes after the procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (mm) (Median)
EMLA2
Lidocaine17

[back to top]

Provider's Overall Satisfaction With the Procedure as Measured by a Scale

"provider-reported measure of how well they believe the procedure went~title: Overall, how satisfied are you with the procedure performed today? min: 0 (completely satisfied) max: 100 (not at all satisfied)" (NCT03654417)
Timeframe: Up to 30 minutes after the procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (mm) (Median)
EMLA3
Lidocaine9.5

[back to top]

Highest Pain Score

"The highest pain score recorded (at time of numbing or at time of biopsy) controlled for baseline pain~title: Please slide the tab along the line below to indicate pain in the area of your vulva (external genitalia) during numbing OR biopsy min: 0 (no pain) max: 100 (worst pain imaginable)" (NCT03654417)
Timeframe: no more than 5 minutes after numbing or 5 minutes after biopsy

Interventionunits on a scale (mm) (Median)
EMLA20
Lidocaine56.5

[back to top]

"Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS Pain Subscale Score by Subject Type"

"The KOOS (KOOS = Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was developed as an extension of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) to evaluate the dimensions of knee osteoarthritis associated pain and injury. It includes 5 separately scored subscales: Pain, Symptoms (including stiffness), Function (Daily Living), Function (Sports and Recreational Activities), and knee-related Quality of Life. Each subscale score is rated on a 5-point scale (i.e., 0 to 4). The previous week is the time period evaluated when answering the questions. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.~The KOOS was administered on Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 8.~Higher scores (or positive change from baseline) indicate improvement." (NCT03661996)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Single Knee Injection (Unilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) INDEX KNEE22.45
Single Knee Injection (Non-Index Knee PJR/TJR) INDEX KNEE23.90
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) INDEX KNEE25.62
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) NON-INDEX KNEE22.10

[back to top]

"Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS Knee-Related Quality of Life Subscale Score by Subject Type"

"The KOOS (KOOS = Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was developed as an extension of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) to evaluate the dimensions of knee osteoarthritis associated pain and injury. It includes 5 separately scored subscales: Pain, Symptoms (including stiffness), Function (Daily Living), Function (Sports and Recreational Activities), and knee-related QOL. Each subscale score is rated on a 5-point scale (i.e., 0 to 4). The previous week is the time period evaluated when answering the questions. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.~The KOOS was administered on Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 8.~Higher scores (or positive change from baseline) indicate improvement." (NCT03661996)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Single Knee Injection (Unilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) INDEX KNEE22.10
Single Knee Injection (Non-Index Knee PJR/TJR) INDEX KNEE16.75
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) INDEX KNEE21.52
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) NON-INDEX KNEE19.40

[back to top]

"Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS Function (Sport and Recreational Activities) Subscale Score by Subject Type"

"The KOOS (KOOS = Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was developed as an extension of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) to evaluate the dimensions of knee osteoarthritis associated pain and injury. It includes 5 separately scored subscales: Pain, Symptoms (including stiffness), Function (Daily Living), Function (Sports and Recreational Activities), and knee-related QOL. Each subscale score is rated on a 5-point scale (i.e., 0 to 4). The previous week is the time period evaluated when answering the questions. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.~The KOOS was administered on Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 8.~Higher scores (or positive change from baseline) indicate improvement." (NCT03661996)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Single Knee Injection (Unilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) INDEX KNEE25.17
Single Knee Injection (Non-Index Knee PJR/TJR) INDEX KNEE33.11
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) INDEX KNEE27.80
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) NON-INDEX KNEE24.80

[back to top]

"Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS Function (Daily Living) Subscale Score by Subject Type"

"The KOOS (KOOS = Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was developed as an extension of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) to evaluate the dimensions of knee osteoarthritis associated pain and injury. It includes 5 separately scored subscales: Pain, Symptoms (including stiffness), Function (Daily Living), Function (Sports and Recreational Activities), and knee-related QOL. Each subscale score is rated on a 5-point scale (i.e., 0 to 4). The previous week is the time period evaluated when answering the questions. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.~The KOOS was administered on Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 8.~Higher scores (or positive change from baseline) indicate improvement." (NCT03661996)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Single Knee Injection (Unilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) INDEX KNEE20.86
Single Knee Injection (Non-Index Knee PJR/TJR) INDEX KNEE25.66
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) INDEX KNEE25.57
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) NON-INDEX KNEE22.26

[back to top]

"Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS Pain With Walking Single Question Score by Subject Type"

"The KOOS (KOOS = Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was developed as an extension of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) to evaluate the dimensions of knee osteoarthritis associated pain and injury. It includes 5 separately scored subscales: Pain, Symptoms (including stiffness), Function (Daily Living), Function (Sports and Recreational Activities), and knee-related Quality of Life. Each subscale score is rated on a 5-point scale (i.e., 0 to 4). The previous week is the time period evaluated when answering the questions. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale. The KOOS Pain with Walking is a single question from the KOOS Pain subscale.~The KOOS was administered on Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 8.~Higher scores (or positive change from baseline) indicate improvement." (NCT03661996)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Single Knee Injection (Unilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) INDEX KNEE21.08
Single Knee Injection (Non-Index Knee PJR/TJR) INDEX KNEE25.26
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) INDEX KNEE25.85
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) NON-INDEX KNEE23.34

[back to top]

"Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS Symptoms Subscale Score by Subject Type"

"The KOOS (KOOS = Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was developed as an extension of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) to evaluate the dimensions of knee osteoarthritis associated pain and injury. It includes 5 separately scored subscales: Pain, Symptoms (including stiffness), Function (Daily Living), Function (Sports and Recreational Activities), and knee-related Quality of Life. Each subscale score is rated on a 5-point scale (i.e., 0 to 4). The previous week is the time period evaluated when answering the questions. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.~The KOOS was administered on Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 8.~Higher scores (or positive change from baseline) indicate improvement." (NCT03661996)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Single Knee Injection (Unilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) INDEX KNEE17.15
Single Knee Injection (Non-Index Knee PJR/TJR) INDEX KNEE20.41
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) INDEX KNEE20.05
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) NON-INDEX KNEE18.40

[back to top]

Determination of Optimal Procedure for Administering CNTX-4975-05 With Regards to Pain, Participant Satisfaction, and Investigator's Satisfaction

"A composite score was calculated for each of the 5 treatment regimens by summing the scores of three assessments: (1) procedure pain 30 minutes after injection of CNTX-4975-05 on a 0-4 scale, 0 was best indicating no procedure pain, 4 was worst indicating severe procedure pain; (2) assessment of subjects' satisfaction with the regimen on a scale of 1 (completely dissatisfied) to 7 (completely satisfied), 1 was worst and 7 was best; and (3) assessment of investigators' satisfaction with the regimen on a scale of 1 (completely dissatisfied) to 7 (completely satisfied), 1 was worst and 7 was best.~The procedure pain at 30 minutes was reversed to a 1-7 scale so 7 was best indicating no procedure pain and 1 was worst indicating severe procedure pain. The three assessments were summed for a total score from 3-21, 3 being the worst outcome and 21 being the best outcome. The geometric mean of the scores was derived for each group.~All assessments were administered on Day 1 (Baseline)." (NCT03661996)
Timeframe: Day 1 assessments

Interventionscore on a scale (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Group 1. Breg Cooling Control17.18
Group 2. Gel Pack Cooling18.26
Group 3. Shortened Gel Pack Cooling16.48
Group 4. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 2% Lidocaine17.40
Group 5. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 1% Lidocaine16.00

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain With Walking NPRS (0-10) Score by Subject Type

"The pain with walking Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (0-10, 0 being no pain, 10 being greatest pain) collected subjects' average pain with walking over the past 24 hours. Subjects recorded the pain in their target knee, either the index knee or additionally the non-index knee in the case of bilateral subjects. The NPRS was collected at Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 8.~Lower scores (or negative change from baseline) indicate improvement" (NCT03661996)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Single Knee Injection (Unilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) INDEX KNEE-3.48
Single Knee Injection (Non-Index Knee PJR/TJR) INDEX KNEE-3.52
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) INDEX KNEE-4.02
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) NON-INDEX KNEE-3.72

[back to top]

Duration of Effect in the Spontaneous NRS Score

"The duration of effect was defined as the duration between time to onset and last timepoint for which decrease from baseline in the spontaneous NRS score was two points or greater. Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Participants were provided with an Actiwatch® during an Actiwatch® training visit to record their spontaneous NRS scores at home. The Actiwatch® alerted the participants twice a day to record their average and maximal NRS scores over the preceding 12 hours. The questions were asked of the participants by the Actiwatch®: Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 12 hours. and Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain at its worst during the last 12 hours." (NCT03663101)
Timeframe: Part B: From baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) up to end of study (Week 16) or early discontinuation.

,,,
Interventiondays (Mean)
Worst NRS scoreAverage NRS score
Dysport 10 U/Injection Site66.80102.75
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection Site86.6865.17
Dysport 20 U/Injection Site110.52110.02
Placebo86.0453.53

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12

For stimulus-evoked NRS score during Quantitative Sensory Testing, participants were submitted to stimuli of various nature (light touch, pressure and temperature) applied to the painful area. Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Static mechanical allodynia is the response to light sustained normally innocuous pressure against the skin. Dynamic mechanical allodynia is the response to a normally innocuous light moving mechanical stimulus on the skin. Temporal summation is a condition, which demonstrates an increased perception of pain to repetitive painful stimuli. (NCT03663101)
Timeframe: Part B: Baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) and Weeks 6 and 12

,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Static mechanical allodynia: BaselineStatic mechanical allodynia: Week 6Static mechanical allodynia: Week 12Dynamic mechanical allodynia: BaselineDynamic mechanical allodynia: Week 6Dynamic mechanical allodynia: Week 12Temporal summation: BaselineTemporal summation: Week 6Temporal summation: Week 12
Dysport 10 U/Injection Site4.2-2.6-2.02.4-2.0-0.23.61.81.4
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection Site3.0-1.7-0.32.3-1.7-1.30.30.30.3
Dysport 20 U/Injection Site4.5-1.0-0.85.3-2.5-2.01.82.82.8
Placebo1.31.00.81.3-0.5-0.31.51.82.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the Study

"Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Participants were provided with an Actiwatch® during an Actiwatch® training visit to record their spontaneous NRS scores at home. The Actiwatch® alerted the participants twice a day to record their average and maximal NRS scores over the preceding 12 hours. The questions were asked of the participants by the Actiwatch®: Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 12 hours. and Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain at its worst during the last 12 hours. Greater reductions in change from baseline correspond to greater pain relief." (NCT03663101)
Timeframe: Part B: From baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) up to end of study (Week 16) or early discontinuation.

,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Daily worst NRS score: BaselineDaily worst NRS score: Week 2Daily worst NRS score: Week 4Daily worst NRS score: Week 6Daily worst NRS score: Week 12Daily worst NRS score: Week 16Daily average NRS score: BaselineDaily average NRS score: Week 2Daily average NRS score: Week 4Daily average NRS score: Week 6Daily average NRS score: Week 12Daily average NRS score: Week 16
Dysport 10 U/Injection Site5.3-1.4-1.4-1.7-0.7-1.34.7-2.1-2.1-2.0-1.2-1.6
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection Site5.1-2.1-2.1-0.1-1.4-1.43.9-2.0-1.9-0.4-1.5-0.9
Dysport 20 U/Injection Site5.8-1.1-1.6-1.6-0.8-0.34.9-1.7-1.4-1.4-0.6-0.4
Placebo5.1-0.6-1.6-1.1-0.5-0.04.5-0.9-1.6-1.0-0.5-0.6

[back to top]

Time to Peak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS Score

"The time to peak effect was defined as the time to reach the peak effect over a 12-hour period. Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Participants were provided with an Actiwatch® during an Actiwatch® training visit to record their spontaneous NRS scores at home. The Actiwatch® alerted the participants twice a day to record their average and maximal NRS scores over the preceding 12 hours. The questions were asked of the participants by the Actiwatch®: Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 12 hours. and Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain at its worst during the last 12 hours." (NCT03663101)
Timeframe: Part B: From baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) up to end of study (Week 16) or early discontinuation.

,,,
Interventiondays (Mean)
Worst NRS scoreAverage NRS score
Dysport 10 U/Injection Site41.9411.04
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection Site33.4633.13
Dysport 20 U/Injection Site3.1126.49
Placebo10.6312.51

[back to top]

Time to Onset of Effect in the Spontaneous Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score

"The time to onset of effect was defined as the time to a decrease from baseline of two points or greater in the spontaneous NRS score. Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Participants were provided with an Actiwatch® during an Actiwatch® training visit to record their spontaneous NRS scores at home. The Actiwatch® alerted the participants twice a day to record their average and maximal NRS scores over the preceding 12 hours. The questions were asked of the participants by the Actiwatch®: Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 12 hours. and Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain at its worst during the last 12 hours. Only descriptive statistical analysis was performed for this outcome measure." (NCT03663101)
Timeframe: Part B: From baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) up to end of study (Week 16) or early discontinuation.

,,,
Interventiondays (Mean)
Worst NRS scoreAverage NRS score
Dysport 10 U/Injection Site29.454.60
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection Site15.1131.63
Dysport 20 U/Injection Site0.650.90
Placebo4.416.75

[back to top]

Peak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS Score

"The peak effect was defined as the maximal decrease from baseline in the spontaneous NRS score over a 12-hour period. Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Participants were provided with an Actiwatch® during an Actiwatch® training visit to record their spontaneous NRS scores at home. The Actiwatch® alerted the participants twice a day to record their average and maximal NRS scores over the preceding 12 hours. The questions were asked of the participants by the Actiwatch®: Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 12 hours. and Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain at its worst during the last 12 hours. Greater reductions in change from baseline correspond to greater pain relief." (NCT03663101)
Timeframe: Part B: From baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) up to end of study (Week 16) or early discontinuation.

,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Worst NRS scoreAverage NRS score
Dysport 10 U/Injection Site-3.54-3.72
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection Site-4.73-3.53
Dysport 20 U/Injection Site-2.82-2.12
Placebo-2.36-2.52

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Reduction in Headache Days From Baseline to Month 8 of Treatment

Reduction in headache days from baseline to month 8 of treatment as self- reported by the patients (yes/no) and as per headache diary and retrospective charts review documentation (NCT03666663)
Timeframe: 8 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lidocaine3
Bupivacaine1
Ropivacaine1
Placebo (Saline)0

[back to top]

Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS-pain) Daily Until Post-injection Day 7

Participants were instructed to log their pain twice daily (morning and night) using a VAS pain scale of 0-10 (0: no pain, 10: highest amount of pain) for the first 7 days after injection. Participants were instructed to bring that pain journal to their 2-week visit. Average daily scores are presented. (NCT03704584)
Timeframe: Post injection day (1-7), 2 weeks and at 6 weeks post intervention

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Post injection day 1Post injection day 2Post injection day 3Post injection day 4Post injection day 5Post injection day 6Post injection day 7
Control Group (Corticosteroid Alone)3.73.02.62.22.01.51.6
Treatment Group (Corticosteroid Injection Plus Lidocaine)3.72.21.71.11.00.690.58

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Subsequent Reinjection and Surgical Operation

The number of patients with subsequent reinjection and surgical operation was collected during follow up. (NCT03704584)
Timeframe: End of follow up (6 weeks post intervention)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Group (Corticosteroid Injection Plus Lidocaine)0
Control Group (Corticosteroid Alone)0

[back to top]

10 Point Likert Scale of Pain Scores Before the Injection and After the Injection and During Follow up in the Corticosteroid Plus Lidocaine Group as Compared to the Corticosteroid Alone Group

Pain will be assessed with a 10-point scale (0: no pain, 10: highest amount of pain) of anticipated pain and anxiety before injection and a 10-point pain scale of the pain of the needle, medication, overall pain and anxiety after the injection was administered to the participants. (NCT03704584)
Timeframe: Pre injection, Post injection day, 2 weeks and at 6 weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Pre-Injection: How painful do you think the injection will be?Pre-Injection: How painful do you think it will be 1-minute after the injection?Pre-Injection: How nervous are you about the injection?Post-Injection: Actual pain of the needlePost-Injection: Actual pain of the medicationPost-Injection: Actual pain 1-minute after the injection
Control Group (Corticosteroid Alone)5.43.23.54.24.31.7
Treatment Group (Corticosteroid Injection Plus Lidocaine)5.94.44.04.34.71.7

[back to top]

Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)

"The evaluation of wound pain relief was based on a 5-point Visual Rating Scale (0 = none improvement; 4 = total relief).~Patients recorded the VRS score every day of treatment in their diary. The improvement in the pain relief was defined as a VRS scores at end of treatment significantly greater than 0." (NCT03720119)
Timeframe: Every day for 15 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 272404424Day 372404424Day 472404424Day 572404424Day 672404424Day 772404424Day 872404424Day 972404424Day 1072404424Day 1172404424Day 1272404424Day 1372404424Day 1472404424Day 1572404424
None reliefMildComplete reliefModerateA lot
Single Cohort23
Single Cohort28
Single Cohort20
Single Cohort24
Single Cohort30
Single Cohort18
Single Cohort2
Single Cohort31
Single Cohort5
Single Cohort17
Single Cohort39
Single Cohort6
Single Cohort21
Single Cohort33
Single Cohort9
Single Cohort16
Single Cohort35
Single Cohort7
Single Cohort25
Single Cohort10
Single Cohort22
Single Cohort12
Single Cohort14
Single Cohort11
Single Cohort3
Single Cohort13
Single Cohort15
Single Cohort4

[back to top]

Change of Pain Intensity From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

"The evaluation of the pain intensity was based on a 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS score from 0= no pain to 10= the most intense pain imaginable). Patients recorded the NPRS score every day of treatment in their diary.~The improvement in the pain intensity is defined as a decrease in NPRS scores from baseline to the end of treatment." (NCT03720119)
Timeframe: Every day for 15 days

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
NPRS score of Day 1NPRS score of Day 2NPRS score of Day 3NPRS score of Day 4NPRS score of Day 5NPRS score of Day 6NPRS score of Day 7NPRS score of Day 8NPRS score of Day 9NPRS score of Day 10NPRS score of Day 11NPRS score of Day 12NPRS score of Day 13NPRS score of Day 14NPRS score of Day 15
Single Cohort6.75.45.04.74.13.93.63.63.63.43.23.23.33.02.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS)

The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. (NCT03796728)
Timeframe: Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Change from Baseline to Day 3072485292Change from Baseline to Month 372485292Change from Baseline to Month 672485292Change from Baseline to Month 1272485292
3 Point Change-2 Point Change-3 Point Change-1 Point Change0 Point Change (No change)1 Point Change2 Point Change
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine5
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine29
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine25
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine0
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine27
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine1
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine3
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine22
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine21
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine4
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine9
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine2

[back to top]

Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS

The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. (NCT03796728)
Timeframe: Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 3072485292Month 372485292Month 672485292Month 1272485292
-2=Much Worse0=No Change2=Much Improved1=Improved-1=Worse
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine32
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine1
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine28
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine21
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine3
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine15
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine34
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine2
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine6
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine25
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine5
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine0

[back to top]

Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)

The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. (NCT03796728)
Timeframe: Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 3072485292Month 372485292Month 672485292Month 1272485292
2=Much Improved1=Improved0=No Change-1=Worse-2=Much Worse
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine32
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine27
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine0
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine24
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine28
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine12
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine39
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine2
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine6

[back to top]

Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories

The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. (NCT03796728)
Timeframe: Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 3072485292Month 372485292Month 672485292Month 1272485292
3=Much Improved0=Worse1=No Change2=Improved
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine30
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine27
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine2
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine28
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine22
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine0
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine6
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine26
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine19
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine10
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine20

[back to top]

Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale

The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. (NCT03796728)
Timeframe: Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 3072485292Month 372485292Month 672485292Month 1272485292
0=Not at all2=Somewhat34=Very muchMissing1
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine3
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine18
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine38
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine15
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine37
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine0
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine1
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine20
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine30
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine4
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine5
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine26

[back to top]

Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale

The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. (NCT03796728)
Timeframe: Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 3072485292Month 372485292Month 672485292Month 1272485292
34=Very much0=Not at all12=Somewhat
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine1
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine5
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine21
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine32
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine17
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine34
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine2
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine0
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine4
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine28

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Satisfaction With Lips as Measured by the FACE-Q Lips Questionnaire

The FACE-Q™ is a validated 10 question assessment measuring how satisfied the participant is with their lips. Each question is answered on a 4-point scale where: 1=Very Dissatisfied, 2=Somewhat dissatisfied, 3=Somewhat satisfied, and 4= Very Satisfied. The responses to the items were converted to a 100-point Rausch transformed scale score: 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT03796728)
Timeframe: Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change from Baseline to Day 30Change from Baseline to Month 3Change from Baseline to Month 6Change from Baseline to Month 12
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine45.242.738.523.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1-point Improvement (Increase) in the Lip Fullness Scale (LFS2) Compared to Baseline Assessment at Day 30

The LFS2 is an Investigator assessment of overall lip fullness measured by a 5-point scale where: 0=Minimal (Flat or nearly flat contour; minimal red lip show), 1=Mild (Some red lip show; no lower lip pout), 2=Moderate (Moderate red lip show with slight lower lip pout), 3=Marked (Significant red lip show and lower lip pout), and 4=Very Marked (Very significant red lip show, lower lip pout, and upper lip pout). The percentage of participants with a ≥ 1-point Improvement (Increase) in the Lip Fullness Scale (LFS2) compared to Baseline are reported. (NCT03796728)
Timeframe: Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to Day 30

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine93.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale

The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. (NCT03796728)
Timeframe: Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 3072485292Month 372485292Month 672485292Month 1272485292
1=Faintly Smooth2=Somewhat Smooth3=Smooth4=Very Smooth0=Lumpy/Grainy
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine22
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine3
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine14
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine35
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine0
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine17
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine1
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine2
Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine33

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Perceive a Difference in Efficacy Between the 2 Sides of Their Face

Participants will be asked if there is a noticeable difference between the 2 sides of their face. (NCT03799484)
Timeframe: Week 16

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All Participants0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Perceive a Difference in Efficacy Between the 2 Sides of Their Face

Participants will be asked if there is a noticeable difference between the 2 sides of their face. (NCT03799484)
Timeframe: Week 2

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All Participants3

[back to top]

Perception of Pain Immediately After Injection as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale

A visual analogue scale will be used to assess pain. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worse pain possible), with lower scores indicating a better outcome. (NCT03799484)
Timeframe: Immediately after botox injection

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Topical Anesthesia2.43
Petrolatum3.96

[back to top]

Eyebrow Excursion

Participants will be asked to raise the brows, and the excursion of the brow from resting position to maximum elevation will be measured in millimeters. (NCT03799484)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Topical Anesthesia10.57
Petrolatum10.57

[back to top]

Eyebrow Excursion

(NCT03799484)
Timeframe: week 16

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Topical Anesthesia8.21
Petrolatum8.07

[back to top]

Duration of Botulinum Toxin Type A Effect

Loss of Botulinum Toxin Type A effect is defined as return of baseline frontalis muscle function (function prior to injection) as indicated by eyebrow excursion measurement within 2 millimeters of baseline value. (NCT03799484)
Timeframe: week 16

Interventionweeks (Mean)
Topical Anesthesia14.2857
Petrolatum15.2857

[back to top]

Eyebrow Excursion

Participants will be asked to raise the brows, and the excursion of the brow from resting position to maximum elevation will be measured in millimeters. (NCT03799484)
Timeframe: Week 6

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Topical Anesthesia5.96
Petrolatum5.68

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Perceive a Difference in Efficacy Between the 2 Sides of Their Face

Participants will be asked if there is a noticeable difference between the 2 sides of their face. (NCT03799484)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All Participants2

[back to top]

Eyebrow Excursion

Participants will be asked to raise the brows, and the excursion of the brow from resting position to maximum elevation will be measured in millimeters. (NCT03799484)
Timeframe: Week 2

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Topical Anesthesia3.46
Petrolatum3.43

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Postoperative Complications

"Includes urinary tract infections, thromboembolic events, pneumonia, postpartum blood transfusions, falls, myocardial infarctions.~These events will be reported as frequencies of occurrence. (These will be reported as dichotomous Yes/No outcomes for each side effect)" (NCT03810235)
Timeframe: up to 120 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Transdermal Lidocaine Patch0
Transdermal Hydrocolloid Placebo Patch0

[back to top]

Number of Opioid Pills Prescribed at Discharge

The number of opioid pills prescribed at discharge (NCT03810235)
Timeframe: up to 72 hours

InterventionNumber of pills (Mean)
Transdermal Lidocaine Patch17.3
Transdermal Hydrocolloid Placebo Patch16.0

[back to top]

Neonatal Outcomes: Gestational Age at Delivery

Gestational age at delivery will be recorded as weeks and days of gestation (NCT03810235)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours

Interventionweeks (Mean)
Transdermal Lidocaine Patch38.7
Transdermal Hydrocolloid Placebo Patch38.85

[back to top]

Length of Hospital Stay

Measured in hours from admission to time of discharge This will be measured in hours from the documented time of admission until discharge (NCT03810235)
Timeframe: up to 120 hours

Interventionhours (Median)
Transdermal Lidocaine Patch75.5
Transdermal Hydrocolloid Placebo Patch76

[back to top]

Time to First Rescue Opioid Analgesic Medication

Measured in minutes from arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) until the first as needed opioid dose is administered. This will be recorded in minutes from the time of the surgery completion (surgery end time) until the first opioid analgesic medication is administered. Data in table is noted in hours. (NCT03810235)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours

Interventionhours (Median)
Transdermal Lidocaine Patch1.4
Transdermal Hydrocolloid Placebo Patch1.7

[back to top]

Total Dose of Opioids During the Whole Hospitalization.

All opioid doses will be converted into oral morphine equivalents. This will be recorded as the total dose of opioids received during the hospitalization (following surgery) calculated as oral morphine equivalents. (NCT03810235)
Timeframe: up to 120 hours

InterventionMME, morphine milligram equivalents (Median)
Transdermal Lidocaine Patch200
Transdermal Hydrocolloid Placebo Patch192

[back to top]

Total Dose of Opioids Received in the First 24 Hours Following Cesarean

The total dose of opioids received in the first 24 hours following Cesarean delivery measured as oral morphine equivalents. This total dose will be calculated for every subject in the study, and the average and standard deviation (or appropriate non-parametric values if the data is not normally distributed) will be compared between the subjects randomized to the intervention arm and the placebo arm of the study. (NCT03810235)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours

InterventionMME, morphine milligram equivalents (Mean)
Transdermal Lidocaine Patch87
Transdermal Hydrocolloid Placebo Patch83.9

[back to top]

Dose Opioids (Measured in Total Morphine Milligram Equivalents (mg) of All Pills) Prescribed at Discharge

Dose opioids (measured in total morphine milligram equivalents (mg) of all pills) prescribed at discharge (NCT03810235)
Timeframe: up to 72 hours

InterventionMME (mg) (Mean)
Transdermal Lidocaine Patch168.35
Transdermal Hydrocolloid Placebo Patch154.10

[back to top]

Post-operative Pain Score at 24 Hours Post-operatively

The post-operative pain score at 24 hours post-operatively will be measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS), wherein subjects rate pain on a 0-10 scale (10 meaning the most pain and 0 meaning no pain). The median NRS score at 24 hours will be compared between the two groups. (NCT03810235)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Median Pain Score (0-10)Pre pregnancy BMI 30-39.9Prepregancy BMI >40Delivery BMI 30 -39.9Delivery BMI >40
Transdermal Hydrocolloid Placebo Patch3.53.04.03.04.0
Transdermal Lidocaine Patch3.03.04.03.03.0

[back to top]

Total Dose of Opioids Used in the First 48 Hours Post-operatively

All opioid doses will be converted into oral morphine equivalents. This will be recorded as the total dose of opioids received in 48 hours following surgery calculated as oral morphine equivalents (NCT03810235)
Timeframe: up to 48 hours

InterventionMME, morphine milligram equivalents (Mean)
Transdermal Lidocaine Patch149.3
Transdermal Hydrocolloid Placebo Patch139.0

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Complications of Lidocaine Use

"Complications of lidocaine use include local burning, nausea, dizziness, drowsiness, serious skin reactions such as blistering, confusion, blurred vision, ringing in the ears, and allergies and hypersensitivities.~Definition: Patient reported side effects which will be reported as frequencies of occurrence. (These will be reported as dichotomous Yes/No outcomes for each side effect)" (NCT03810235)
Timeframe: up to 6 weeks postpartum

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Transdermal Lidocaine Patch2
Transdermal Hydrocolloid Placebo Patch4

[back to top]

Post-operative PACU Time

Difference in time in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) after surgery (NCT03824808)
Timeframe: During hospitalization, approximately 2 hours post-surgery

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Treatment Group59
Control Group122.5

[back to top]

Difference in Post-operative Pain Scores Measured by Visual Analog Scale

"10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), score of 0 no pain to a score of 10 worst pain ever" (NCT03824808)
Timeframe: Through study completion, assessed at 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h, 12h and 24h post operatively, then every 24 hours until discharge, and at the post operative visit which occurred within 21-days post-operatively.

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Pain 1 hour post operativePain 2 hours post operativePain 4 hours post operativePain 6 hours post operativePain 12 hours post operativePain 24 hours post operativePain 48 hours post operativePain 72 hours post operativePain 96 hours post operativePain 120 hours post operativePain on dischargePain at post operative visit
Treatment Group5.54.44.84.03.62.32.556510.5

[back to top]

Difference in Post-operative Pain Scores Measured by Visual Analog Scale

"10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), score of 0 no pain to a score of 10 worst pain ever" (NCT03824808)
Timeframe: Through study completion, assessed at 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h, 12h and 24h post operatively, then every 24 hours until discharge, and at the post operative visit which occurred within 21-days post-operatively.

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Pain 1 hour post operativePain 2 hours post operativePain 4 hours post operativePain 6 hours post operativePain 12 hours post operativePain 24 hours post operativePain 48 hours post operativePain on dischargePain at post operative visit
Control Group4.04.23.12.52.41.9220.5

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption

Difference in opioid consumption in first 24 hours, discharge and 21 days post-operatively (morphine equivalents) (NCT03824808)
Timeframe: Through study completion, assessed for first 24-hours post operatively, then every 24 hours until discharge, and at the post operative visit which occurred within 21-days post-operatively.

InterventionMilligram Morphine Equivalent (Mean)
Milligram morphine equivalent (MME) 0-24h postopMilligram morphine equivalent (MME) 25-48h postopMilligram morphine equivalent (MME) prescribed at discharge for home useMilligram morphine equivalent (MME) used of discharge prescription
Control Group12.021.323.08.8

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption

Difference in opioid consumption in first 24 hours, discharge and 21 days post-operatively (morphine equivalents) (NCT03824808)
Timeframe: Through study completion, assessed for first 24-hours post operatively, then every 24 hours until discharge, and at the post operative visit which occurred within 21-days post-operatively.

InterventionMilligram Morphine Equivalent (Mean)
Milligram morphine equivalent (MME) 0-24h postopMilligram morphine equivalent (MME) 25-48h postopMilligram morphine equivalent (MME) 49-72h postopMilligram morphine equivalent (MME) 73-96h postopMilligram morphine equivalent (MME) 97-120h postopMilligram morphine equivalent (MME) prescribed at discharge for home useMilligram morphine equivalent (MME) used of discharge prescription
Treatment Group22.526.37.57.57.526.820.0

[back to top]

Anesthesia Time to Wake up

time in minutes from scope out until ready for transport to post anesthesia care unit (NCT03829618)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Topical Lidocaine8.47
Nebuliser Solution13.00
Atomizer Solution6.14

[back to top]

Cough

Number of coughs during procedure as defined by cough requiring stopping procedure or treatment by anesthesiologist with propofol or alfentanyl (NCT03829618)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventioncoughs (Mean)
Topical Lidocaine1.20
Nebuliser Solution1.71
Atomizer Solution1.00

[back to top]

Fentanyl Dosing

total fentanyl dosing by anesthesia in mcg/kg (NCT03829618)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionmcg/kg (Mean)
Topical Lidocaine0.30
Nebuliser Solution0.24
Atomizer Solution0.48

[back to top]

Propofol Dosing

Total propofol dosing by anesthesia in mg/kg (NCT03829618)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionmg/kg (Mean)
Topical Lidocaine5.30
Nebuliser Solution6.93
Atomizer Solution3.26

[back to top]

Alfentanyl Dosing

Total alfentanyl dosing by anesthesia in mcg/kg (NCT03829618)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionmcg/kg (Mean)
Topical Lidocaine16.61
Nebuliser Solution47.99
Atomizer Solution4.40

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Assessed as Having Natural Treatment Results

"Blinded evaluator assessed participants by answering Strongly agree/Agree/Neither agree nor disagree/Disagree/Strongly disagree to the question Are the subject's treatment results natural looking?. Having natural treatment results is defined as being assessed with answers Strongly agree or Agree." (NCT03869450)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Restylane Volyme93.5
Restylane Defyne100
Restylane Lyft Lidocaine93.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Aesthetic Improvement of Midface

A blinded evaluator assesses the improvement compared to baseline (pre-treatment) using a 5-graded scale; Worse, No change, Improved, Much improved or Very much improved. Aesthetic improvement of midface is defined as those participants assessed as Improved, Much improved or Very much improved. (NCT03869450)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Restylane Volyme96.8
Restylane Defyne100
Restylane Lyft Lidocaine97.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improved Midface Volume

"A blinded evaluator assessed the fullness of the midface by using a 4-graded scale where 1= fairly full and 4= substantial loss of fullness.~Improved midface volume was defined as at least a 1-grade decrease from baseline." (NCT03869450)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Restylane Volyme90.3
Restylane Defyne87.5
Restylane Lyft Lidocaine79.4

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Scores at 72 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable at 72 hours (NCT03885596)
Timeframe: 72 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
CA-008 Cohort 11.2
CA-008 Cohort 20.3
CA-008 Cohort 32.0
Exparel4.6

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Scores at 24 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable at 24 hours (NCT03885596)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
CA-008 Cohort 10.6
CA-008 Cohort 21.7
CA-008 Cohort 35.1
Exparel6.0

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption

Summary of opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (NCT03885596)
Timeframe: 0-72 hours

Interventionmg morphine equivalents (Mean)
CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 110.83
CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 23.33
CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 338.33
Exparel80.83

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores (at Rest) Over 72h

Area Under the Curve of pain intensity scores (using a Numeric Rating Scale of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable) over 72 hours (NCT03885596)
Timeframe: 0-72 hours

Interventionscore on a scale*hour (Mean)
CA-008 Cohort 172.30
CA-008 Cohort 266.24
CA-008 Cohort 3203.76
Exparel306.58

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Scores at 48 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable at 48 hours (NCT03885596)
Timeframe: 48 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
CA-008 Cohort 11.3
CA-008 Cohort 20.6
CA-008 Cohort 32.7
Exparel4.8

[back to top]

Post Lumbar Puncture PRN Pain Medication Usage

"Use of PRN or as needed pain medicine by the patient was determined. Patients with parent/guardian assistance were asked to record the as needed pain control medication, acetaminophen. the patient used within the 24 hours after lumber puncture. Counts of patients using acetaminophen in the 24 hours following lumber puncture are reported." (NCT04003012)
Timeframe: 24 hours following lumbar puncture

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
EMLA1
Lidocaine2

[back to top]

Post Lumbar Puncture Pain: Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale

"Pain was self-reported by the child using the validated pain scale, Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale. The scale shows a series of six faces ranging from a happy face at 0, or no hurt, to a crying face at 10, which represents hurts like the worst pain imaginable. Based on the faces and written descriptions, the patient chooses the face that best describes their level of pain, with higher the number, greater the pain.~Below are the median and range of values (minimal to maximal) reported by each arm's 10 patients. Reported values were identical between arms." (NCT04003012)
Timeframe: , pain will be assessed at 30 - 60 minutes after waking up after lumbar puncture and 24 hours after lumbar puncture

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale Score 30 - 60 minutes after waking up after lumbar punctureWong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale Score 24 hours after lumbar puncture
EMLA00
Lidocaine Injection00

[back to top]

Verbal Pain Scale (VRS) - 4 Week Post-op

Postoperative pain was measured by verbal rate scale (VRS) Scale of 0-10 at instance of 4-week post-op visit (or phone call). 0 represents no pain while 10 represents worst possible pain. (NCT04005859)
Timeframe: Single VRS assessed at 4-week post-op visit (or phone call)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
CONTROL: IV Lido0.4
EXPERIMENTAL: Exparel1.1

[back to top]

Pain Outcome: Visual Analog Scale

Assessed using the visual analog scale (0-10 scale). Zero indicates no pain, 10 indicates worst pain ever (NCT04023695)
Timeframe: Assessed 1 minute after injection (in clinic)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Corticosteroid With Lidocaine With Epinephrine3.5
Corticosteroid With Normal Saline2

[back to top]

Pain Outcome: Visual Analog Scale

Assessed using the visual analog scale (0-10 scale). Zero indicates no pain, 10 indicates worst pain ever (NCT04023695)
Timeframe: Assessed after 24 hours after injection (by phone)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Corticosteroid With Lidocaine With Epinephrine1.2
Corticosteroid With Normal Saline1

[back to top]

Sensation as Indicated by the Volume of Water Filled (ml) at the Time of Patient Perception of First Sensation, First Urge to Void, Strong Urge to Void, and Full Bladder Capacity During Bladder Filling.

Assess whether use of intraurethral 2% lidocaine jelly meaningfully impacts sensation during filling (especially, strong desire to void). (NCT04038099)
Timeframe: Within same visit, approximately 90-120 minutes.

,
InterventionmL (Median)
First SensationFirst Urge to VoidStrong Urge to VoidMaximum Capacity
Lidocaine 2% Jelly18107263365
Water Based Lubricating Jelly17137243344

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Pain/Discomfort as Indicated by Visual Analog Scale (Scale of 0-100 With 0 Being no Pain and 100 Being the Worst the Pain Imaginable).

Determine whether the use of intraurethral lidocaine 2% jelly meaningfully impacts pain/discomfort measured by a visual analog scale during cystometry (catheter insertion and at maximum cystometric capacity), during pressure flow study (PFS), and post-procedure. (NCT04038099)
Timeframe: Change from cystometrogram 1 to cystometrogram 2 within same visit, approximately 90-120 minutes.

,
Interventionmm on a VAS Pain Scale (Median)
Catheter insertionMaximum capacityPressure flow studyOverall participant discomfort
Lidocaine 2% Jelly4.51034
Water Based Lubricating Jelly7879

[back to top]

Voiding Metrics: Voiding Pattern (Normal vs. Intermittent/Interrupted vs Prolonged) as Perceived by Provider Interpretation of Pressure Flow Study During Voiding Based on Seconds to Void and Whether Urine Stream is Constant or Intermittent/Interrupted.

"Determine whether the use of intraurethral 2% lidocaine jelly meaningfully impacts voiding pattern. Voiding pattern was assessed in UDS #2 and identified as either normal, prolonged, intermittent, interrupted or a combination of those identifiers and compared between the two groups." (NCT04038099)
Timeframe: within same visit, approximately 90-120 minutes.

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NormalIntermittentInterruptedProlonged
Lidocaine 2% Jelly3211824
Water Based Lubricating Jelly3151417

[back to top]

Filling Metrics: Number of Participants With Detrusor Overactivity

Determine whether the use of intraurethral 2% lidocaine jelly meaningfully impacts the presence/absence of detrusor overactivity (bladder spasm) during urodynamic bladder testing. Detrusor overactivity was noted and compared between placebo and lidocaine jelly on UDS #2. (NCT04038099)
Timeframe: Cystometrogram 2 within same visit, approximately 90-120 minutes.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Water Based Lubricating Jelly10
Lidocaine 2% Jelly6

[back to top]

Filling Metrics: Number of Participants With Normal Bladder Compliance

Determine whether the use of intraurethral 2% lidocaine jelly meaningfully impacts bladder compliance (change in volume/ change in detrusor pressure (Pdet)). Compliance in UDS #2 was noted and compared in both groups: water-based lubricant and intraurethral 2% lidocaine jelly. Results indicate how many participants in which normal compliance was observed. *There were 3 missing data values in our data. (NCT04038099)
Timeframe: Within same visit, approximately 90-120 minutes.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Water Based Lubricating Jelly28
Lidocaine 2% Jelly32

[back to top]

Voiding Metrics: Percentage of Voiding Efficiency

Determine whether the use of intraurethral 2% lidocaine jelly meaningfully impacts voiding efficiency, which is calculated as the voided volume (mL) divided by the sum of the voided volume (mL) and the post-void residual volume (mL). Voiding efficiency was compared by treatment arm in UDS #2. (NCT04038099)
Timeframe: Cystometrogram 2 within same visit, approximately 90-120 minutes.

Interventionpercentage of voiding efficiency (Median)
Water Based Lubricating Jelly94.6
Lidocaine 2% Jelly95.9

[back to top]

Voiding Metrics: Pdet Peak Flow

Determine whether the use of intraurethral 2& lidocaine jelly meaningfully impacts Pdet Peak Flow (cm/H2O) on UDS #2. (NCT04038099)
Timeframe: Within same visit, approximately 90-120 minutes.

Interventioncm/H2O (Median)
Water Based Lubricating Jelly20
Lidocaine 2% Jelly13

[back to top]

Voiding Metrics: Pdet Max

Determine whether the use of intraurethral 2% lidocaine jelly meaningfully impacts Pdet Max (cm/H2O) on UDS #2. (NCT04038099)
Timeframe: Within same visit, approximately 90-120 minutes.

Interventioncm/H2O (Median)
Water Based Lubricating Jelly37
Lidocaine 2% Jelly28.5

[back to top]

Voiding Metrics: Voided Volume and Post-void Residual

Determine whether the use of intraurethral 2% lidocaine jelly meaningfully impacts voided volume and post-void residual (mL) as recorded during UDS #2. (NCT04038099)
Timeframe: Within same visit, approximately 90-120 minutes.

,
InterventionmL (Median)
Voided VolumePost Void Residual
Lidocaine 2% Jelly31815
Water Based Lubricating Jelly27829

[back to top]

Provider Perception of Patient Pain/Discomfort as Indicated by Visual Analog Scale (Scale of 0-100 With 0 Being no Pain and 100 Being the Worst Pain Imaginable).

Determine whether the use of intraurethral 2% lidocaine jelly meaningfully impacts provider perception of patient discomfort. (NCT04038099)
Timeframe: Change from cystometrogram 1 to cystometrogram 2 within same visit, approximately 90-120 minutes.

Interventionmm on a VAS Pain Scale (Median)
Water Based Lubricating Jelly9
Lidocaine 2% Jelly6

[back to top]

Voiding Metrics: Maximum Flow Rate

Determine whether the use of intraurethral 2% lidocaine jelly meaningfully impacts maximum flow rate (mL/sec). (NCT04038099)
Timeframe: Within same visit, approximately 90-120 minutes.

InterventionmL/sec (Median)
Water Based Lubricating Jelly18.2
Lidocaine 2% Jelly16.5

[back to top]

Onset of Soft Tissue Anesthesia

Time to gum numbness, assessed using periodontal probe and patient response. (NCT04055116)
Timeframe: Time of injection to 4 minutes post-injection (tested in 15 second intervals).

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Unbuffered Lidocaine102.21
Buffered Lidocaine81.07

[back to top]

Patient Reported Pain Perception

Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale responses after buffered and non-buffered lidocaine. Range: 0 - No Hurt to 10 - Hurts Worst (higher numbers indicate higher levels of pain). There are no sub-scores. (NCT04055116)
Timeframe: Within 1 minute of anesthetic administration

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Unbuffered Lidocaine3.52
Buffered Lidocaine3.48

[back to top]

Provider Reported Pain Perception

Faces, Legs, Arms, Crying Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Pain Scale. This scale helps clinicians assess patients' pain based on behavioral observations. Range: 0 - 2 per category (higher number indicates more observed agitation/potential pain). A score is given in each of the five categories (Faces, Legs, Arms, Crying, Consolability). The sum of these scores provides the Assessment of Behavioral Score (range: 0 - 10) with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain. (NCT04055116)
Timeframe: During local anesthesia administration

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Unbuffered Lidocaine1.88
Buffered Lidocaine2.43

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders Based on the Intra-individual Improvement of at Least One Grade on the Perioral Rhytids Severity Rating Scale (PR-SRS) Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the TI

A responder corresponds to a subject with an intra-individual improvement of at least one grade on the PR-SRS compared to Baseline (NCT04069585)
Timeframe: Visit 1 - Baseline (pre-injection), Visit 1 (post-injection), Visit 2 (Day 30)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Visit 1 - post-injection72557804Visit 1 - post-injection72557805Visit 2 - day 3072557804Visit 2 - day 3072557805
ResponderNot responder
RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine29
RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent28
RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine1
RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent2
RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent29
RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent1

[back to top]

"Number of Both Satisfied or Very Satisfied Subjects With Study Treatment Using the Subject's Satisfaction Scale"

"The Subject Satisfaction Scale is a subjective, balanced, 5-point scale assessing subject satisfaction with study treatment. Possible scores range from with 1 (very satisfied) to 5 (very dissatisfied).~Proportion of subjects who were Satisfied (i.e., 1-Very Satisfied + 2-Satisfied) was compared to the proportion of subjects who were Not Satisfied (i.e., 3-Neither Satisfied nor dissatisfied + 4-Dissatisfied + 5-Very Dissatisfied)" (NCT04069585)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (post-injection) and Visit 2 (Day 30)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Visit 1 (post-injection)72557804Visit 1 (post-injection)72557805Visit 2 (Day 30)72557804Visit 2 (Day 30)72557805
Satisfied (i.e., 1-Very Satisfied + 2-Satisfied)Not Satisfied (i.e., 3-Neither Satisfied nor dissa
RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine29
RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent29
RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine1
RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent1

[back to top]

Subject's Perception of Treatment Effectiveness as Per the FACE-Q (Perioral Rhytids Domain) Questionnaire.

"The FACE-Q measures the experience and outcomes of aesthetic facial procedures from the patient's perspective.~FACE-Q questionnaire is composed of 6 questions with a score linked to answers (1 being 'Not at all' and 4 being 'Extremely').~The subject will be instructed as follows: These questions ask about how you look right now. For each question, circle only one answer. With the area around your lips in mind, in the past week, how much have you been bothered by:, and will provide response.~To calculate the FACE-Q, outcomes from all 6 questions were pooled, data were transformed so that higher scores reflected a superior outcome, and adapted to a scale of 100 units (i.e. lowest score = 0, highest score = 100)." (NCT04069585)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline) and Visit 2 (Day 30)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline Face-Q ScoreDay 30 Face-Q ScoreFace-Q Change from Baseline to Day 30
RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine13.073.960.9
RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent12.577.264.7

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Post Injection Treatment Responses (From Common Treatment Responses (CTR) Diary) for Safety Evaluation of RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine

"The subjects will receive a diary booklet and instructions for recording his/her observations of the Common Treatment Responses to the study treatments within 30 days following the treatment. The diary will be discussed during follow-up phone-call and visit. Subjects were instructed to complete the diary at approximately the same time each day (i.e., am or pm).~The subject diary captured the following Common Treatment Responses (CTR) that occur following the injection of a dermal filler; specifically, redness, pain, tenderness, firmness, swelling, lumps/bumps, bruising, itching, discoloration, and other.~The 30-day patient CTR diary included a detailed glossary describing all signs/symptoms listed in the diary; an option was provided to report other reactions if the subject experienced a sign/symptom that was not listed." (NCT04069585)
Timeframe: During 30 days after injection

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BruisingDiscolorationFirmnessItchingLumps/BumpsPainRednessSwellingTendernessNeedle track marksInjection Site Soreness
RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine161019217415191211
RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent121014415316211311

[back to top]

Difference Between RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine in Term of Reducing Pain at 15, 30, 45 and 60 Minutes Post-injection in Each Side of the Mouth.

"Injection pain was measured on the 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), as assessed by subjects in each side of the mouth.~VAS is a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning intolerable pain" (NCT04069585)
Timeframe: Visit 1 - 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes post-injection

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
15 Min30 Min45 Min60 Min
RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine6.31.00.30.0
RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent6.81.00.40.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of PR-SRS Score for RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent Vs RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine for the Correction of Perioral Rhytids as Assessed by the Treating Investigator (TI)

"PR-SRS (Perioral Rhytids Severity Rating Scale) is a validated 4-grade scale with 0 being Absent and 3 being Severe" (NCT04069585)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, pre-injection) - Visit 1 (post-injection), Visit 2 (Day 30)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Visit 1 (Post-injection)Visit 2 (Day 30)
RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine-1.5-1.4
RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent-1.5-1.4

[back to top]

"Number of Subjects Scored Either Much Improved or Improved on Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) by the Treating Investigator (TI)"

"Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) is a subjective 5-grade scale comprised of much improved, improved, no change, worse, and much worse.~GAI will bewas assessed using the baseline photograph. Each side of the mouth were assessed independently." (NCT04069585)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (post-injection) and Visit 2 (Day 30)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Visit 1 (post-injection)Visit 2 (Day30)
RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine3030
RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent3030

[back to top]

"Number of Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) Responders (i.e., Scoring Either Much Improved or Improved) on GAI Scale According to Subject's Self-assessment"

"Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) is a subjective 5-grade scale comprised of much improved, improved, no change, worse, and much worse.~GAI was assessed using the baseline photograph. Subjects were instructed as follows: Use a mirror to compare your face to the photograph provided to you and rate the degree of aesthetic improvement by using the following scale.~Each side of the face was assessed independently." (NCT04069585)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (post-injection) and Visit 2 (Day 30)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Visit 1 (post-injection)Visit 2 (Day 30)
RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine3030
RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent3030

[back to top]

Non-inferiority of RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine in Terms of Reducing Pain During Device Injection Into the Upper Perioral Rhytids.

"Injection pain during injection was measured on the 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), as assessed by subjects immediately after injection of each upper perioral quadrant.~VAS is a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning intolerable pain" (NCT04069585)
Timeframe: Visit 1 - During Injection

Interventionmm (Mean)
RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine22.4
RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent25.0

[back to top]

Difference Between RHA® 4 With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® 4-Lidocaine in Term of Reducing Pain at 15, 30, 45 and 60 Minutes Post-injection in Nasolabial Folds of Each Side of the Face.

"Injection pain was measured on the 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), as assessed by subjects in nasolabial fold of each side of the face.~VAS is a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning intolerable pain" (NCT04087395)
Timeframe: Visit 1 - 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes post-injection

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
15 Min30 Min45 Min60 Min
RHA®4 With New Anesthetic Agent4.92.00.00.0
RHA®4-Lidocaine5.13.12.11.9

[back to top]

"Number of Subjects Satisfied or Very Satisfied With Study Treatment Using the Subject's Satisfaction Scale"

"The Subject Satisfaction Scale is a subjective, balanced, 5-point scale assessing subject satisfaction with study treatment. Possible scores range from with 1 (very satisfied) to 5 (very dissatisfied).~Proportion of subjects who were Satisfied (i.e., 1-Very Satisfied + 2-Satisfied) was compared to the proportion of subjects who were Not Satisfied (i.e., 3-Neither Satisfied nor dissatisfied + 4-Dissatisfied + 5-Very Dissatisfied)" (NCT04087395)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (just after receiving treatment) and Visit 2 (Day 30)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Visit 1 (post-injection) : SatisfiedVisit 1 (post-inj): Not SatisfiedVisit 2 (Day 30) : Satisfied (i.e., 1-Very Satisfied + 2-Satisfied)Visit 2 (Day 30) : Not Satisfied
RHA®4 With New Anesthetic Agent300291
RHA®4-Lidocaine300291

[back to top]

"Number of Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) Responders (i.e., Scoring Either Much Improved or Improved) on GAI Scale According to Subject's Self-assessment"

"Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) is a subjective 5-grade scale comprised of much improved, improved, no change, worse, and much worse.~GAI was assessed using the baseline photograph. Subjects were instructed: Use a mirror to compare your face to the photograph provided to you and rate the degree of aesthetic improvement by using the following scale.~Each side of the face was assessed independently." (NCT04087395)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (just after receiving treatment) and Visit 2 (Day 30)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Visit 1 (post-injection)Visit 2 (Day 30)
RHA®4 With New Anesthetic Agent3030
RHA®4-Lidocaine3030

[back to top]

Non-inferiority of RHA® 4 With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® 4-Lidocaine in Terms of Reducing Pain During Device Injection Into Nasolabial Folds.

"Injection pain during injection will be based on the 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), as assessed by subjects immediately after injection of each nasolabial fold.~VAS is a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning intolerable pain." (NCT04087395)
Timeframe: Visit 1 - During Injection

Interventionmm (Mean)
RHA®4 With New Anesthetic Agent17.1
RHA®4-Lidocaine16.3

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Post Injection Treatment Responses (From Common Treatment Responses (CTR) Diary) for Safety Evaluation of RHA® 4 With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® 4-Lidocaine

"The subjects received a diary booklet and instructions for recording their observations of the Common Treatment Responses to the study treatments during 30 days following the injection. The diary were discussed during follow-up phone call and visit. Subjects were instructed to complete the diary at approximately the same time each day (i.e., am or pm).~The subject diary captured the following Common Treatment Responses (CTR) that occur following the injection of a dermal filler; specifically, redness, pain, tenderness, firmness, swelling, lumps/bumps, bruising, itching, discoloration, and other.~The 30-day patient CTR diary included a detailed glossary describing all signs/symptoms listed in the diary; an option was provided to rate other if the subject experienced a sign/symptom that is not listed." (NCT04087395)
Timeframe: During 30 days after injection

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BruisingDiscolorationFirmnessItchingLumps/BumpsPainRednessSwellingTendernessParesthesia
RHA®4 With New Anesthetic Agent191124722122121241
RHA®4-Lidocaine21122262192023240

[back to top]

Subject's Perception of Treatment Effectiveness as Per the FACE-Q (Nasolabial Folds Domain) Questionnaire. The FACE-Q Measures the Experience and Outcomes of Aesthetic Facial Procedures From the Patient's Perspective.

"FACE-Q questionnaire is composed of 5 questions with a score linked to answers (1 being 'Not at all' and 4 being 'Extremely').~The subject will be instructed as follows: These questions ask about how you look right now. For each question, circle only one answer. With your nasolabial folds in mind (the deep lines that run downward from the sides of your nose), in the past week, how much have you been bothered by:, and will provide response.~To calculate the FACE-Q, outcomes from all 5 questions were pooled, data were transformed so that higher scores reflected a superior outcome, and adapted to a scale of 100 units (i.e. lowest score = 0, highest score = 100)." (NCT04087395)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline) and Visit 2 (Day 30)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline Face-Q ScoreDay 30 Face-Q ScoreFace-Q Change from Baseline to Day 30
RHA®4 With New Anesthetic Agent25.289.063.8
RHA®4-Lidocaine24.388.564.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders Based on the Intra-individual Improvement of at Least One Grade on the Nasolabial Folds Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (NLF-WSRS) Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the TI

A responder corresponds to a subject with an intra-individual improvement of at least one grade on the NLF WSRS compared to Baseline, as assessed by the TI (NCT04087395)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline, pre-injection), Visit 1 (post-injection), Visit 2 (Day 30)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Visit 1 (post-injection)72549294Visit 1 (post-injection)72549295Visit 2 (Day 30)72549294Visit 2 (Day 30)72549295
ResponderNot Responder
RHA®4-Lidocaine30
RHA®4-Lidocaine0
RHA®4 With New Anesthetic Agent30
RHA®4-Lidocaine29
RHA®4 With New Anesthetic Agent0
RHA®4-Lidocaine1

[back to top]

Change in NLF WSRS Score Between Baseline and Day 30 as Assessed by the Treating Investigator

"NLF-WSRS (Nasolabial Folds- Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale) is a validated 5-grade scale with 1 being Absent and 5 being Extreme" (NCT04087395)
Timeframe: Visit 1 - Baseline (pre-injection), Visit 1 (post-injection), Visit 2 (Day 30)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Visit 1 (post-injection)Visit 2 (Day 30)
RHA®4 With New Anesthetic Agent-1.8-1.9
RHA®4-Lidocaine-1.8-1.8

[back to top]

"Number of Subjects Scored Either Much Improved or Improved on Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) by the Treating Investigator (TI)"

"Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) is a subjective 5-grade scale comprised of much improved, improved, no change, worse, and much worse.~GAI was assessed using the baseline photograph. Each side of the face will be assessed independently." (NCT04087395)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (just after receiving treatment) and Visit 2 (Day 30)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Visit 1 (post-injection)Visit 2 (Day 30)
RHA®4 With New Anesthetic Agent3030
RHA®4-Lidocaine3029

[back to top]

Cumulative Oral Morphine Milligram Equivalent (OME) Consumption at 24 Hours

MME = morphine milligram equivalent (NCT04140396)
Timeframe: After 24 hours of treatment

InterventionMME (Mean)
Active Comparator7.5

[back to top]

Pain Score

Pain scores at rest rated using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst imaginable (NCT04140396)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1, 10, 13, 16, and 17 hours post-lidocaine infusion

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Pre-infusion baseline1 hour post-infusion10 hours post-infusion13 hours post-infusion16 hours post-infusion17 hours post-infusion
Active Comparator110042

[back to top]

Incentive Spirometry Volumes

An incentive spirometer is a device that measures how deeply you can inhale. Higher volumes indicate greater ability to inhale. (NCT04140396)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion baseline and 24 hours post-infusion

InterventionmL (Mean)
Pre-infusion baseline24 hours post-infusion
Active Comparator15001500

[back to top]

Number of Pulmonary Complication Events

Pulmonary complications include ARDS, pneumonia, aspiration, empyema, etc. (NCT04140396)
Timeframe: 29 hours

Interventionevents (Mean)
Active Comparator0

[back to top]

Length of Hospital Stay

Number of hours stayed at the hospital from the day of operation till the day of discharge. (NCT04140396)
Timeframe: 29 hours

Interventionhours (Mean)
Active Comparator29

[back to top]

Need for Additional Local Anesthetic

Need for additional infiltrated local anesthetic (lidocaine) (NCT04203225)
Timeframe: At any time during suturing procedure, time frame is duration of procedure, generally 10-20 minutes, less than one hour. Determined by chart review immediately after procedure completion.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Single LET4
Triple LET5

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale Pain Score

Pain score self-rated by patient on 100m Visual Analog Pain scale, minimum value 0, maximum value 100, higher scores equal more pain (worse outcome) (NCT04203225)
Timeframe: Immediately on placement or attempt at placement of first suture

Interventionmm (Mean)
Single LET16
Triple LET16

[back to top]

Serum Lidocaine Level

Serum lidocaine level measured via a blood test. Lidocaine has a therapeutic drug range of 1.5 to 5.0 mcg/mL. (NCT04208516)
Timeframe: 48 hours after surgery

Interventionmcg/mL (Number)
Single Nerve Blocks Plus IV Lidocaine Infusion5.8

[back to top]

Serum Lidocaine Level

Serum lidocaine level measured via a blood test. Lidocaine has a therapeutic drug range of 1.5 to 5.0 mcg/mL. (NCT04208516)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventionmcg/mL (Mean)
Continuous Nerve Blocks2.5

[back to top]

Pain After Surgery

By numeric pain rating scale, 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain (NCT04208516)
Timeframe: 72 hours after surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Continuous Nerve Blocks5.36
Single Nerve Blocks Plus IV Lidocaine Infusion5.0

[back to top]

Pain After Surgery

By numeric pain rating scale, 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain (NCT04208516)
Timeframe: 6 hours after surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Continuous Nerve Blocks6.17
Single Nerve Blocks Plus IV Lidocaine Infusion6.14

[back to top]

Pain After Surgery

By numeric pain rating scale, 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain (NCT04208516)
Timeframe: 48 hours after surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Continuous Nerve Blocks5.86
Single Nerve Blocks Plus IV Lidocaine Infusion4.83

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption After Surgery

Opioids will be converted to oral morphine equivalents (NCT04208516)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

InterventionOME (Mean)
Continuous Nerve Blocks34.93
Single Nerve Blocks Plus IV Lidocaine Infusion46.50

[back to top]

Local Anesthetic Consumption After Surgery

Local anesthetic consumption after surgery is reported in mg of lidocaine (NCT04208516)
Timeframe: 72 hours after surgery

Interventionmg (Mean)
Continuous Nerve Blocks2721.79
Single Nerve Blocks Plus IV Lidocaine Infusion2570.0

[back to top]

Local Anesthetic Consumption After Surgery

Local anesthetic consumption after surgery is reported in mg of lidocaine (NCT04208516)
Timeframe: 48 hours after surgery

Interventionmg (Mean)
Continuous Nerve Blocks1973.57
Single Nerve Blocks Plus IV Lidocaine Infusion2308.33

[back to top]

Local Anesthetic Consumption After Surgery

Local anesthetic consumption after surgery is reported in mg of lidocaine (NCT04208516)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventionmg (Mean)
Continuous Nerve Blocks1096.07
Single Nerve Blocks Plus IV Lidocaine Infusion1139.29

[back to top]

Local Anesthetic Consumption After Surgery

Local anesthetic consumption after surgery is reported in mg of lidocaine (NCT04208516)
Timeframe: 12 hours after surgery

Interventionmg (Mean)
Continuous Nerve Blocks574.29
Single Nerve Blocks Plus IV Lidocaine Infusion600

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events

Nausea and vomiting requiring treatment, hypotension, or bradycardia or tachycardia (NCT04208516)
Timeframe: From time of surgery to discharge, on average 1-4 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Continuous Nerve Blocks0
Single Nerve Blocks Plus IV Lidocaine Infusion0

[back to top]

Total Hospital Length of Stay

Hospital length of stay is measured in days from admission until discharge. (NCT04208516)
Timeframe: From admission to discharge, on average 1-4 days

Interventiondays (Mean)
Continuous Nerve Blocks9.04
Single Nerve Blocks Plus IV Lidocaine Infusion4.94

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption After Surgery

Opioids will be converted to oral morphine equivalents (NCT04208516)
Timeframe: 48 hours after surgery

InterventionOME (Mean)
Continuous Nerve Blocks61.5
Single Nerve Blocks Plus IV Lidocaine Infusion84.75

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption After Surgery

Opioids will be converted to oral morphine equivalents (NCT04208516)
Timeframe: 72 hours after surgery

InterventionOME (Mean)
Continuous Nerve Blocks88.57
Single Nerve Blocks Plus IV Lidocaine Infusion128.1

[back to top]

Pain After Surgery

By numeric pain rating scale, 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain (NCT04208516)
Timeframe: 12 hours after surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Continuous Nerve Blocks6.17
Single Nerve Blocks Plus IV Lidocaine Infusion6.07

[back to top]

Pain After Surgery

By numeric pain rating scale, 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain (NCT04208516)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Continuous Nerve Blocks4.5
Single Nerve Blocks Plus IV Lidocaine Infusion6.43

[back to top]

Serum Lidocaine Level

Serum lidocaine level measured via a blood test. Lidocaine has a therapeutic drug range of 1.5 to 5.0 mcg/mL. (NCT04208516)
Timeframe: 72 hours after surgery

Interventionmcg/mL (Number)
Single Nerve Blocks Plus IV Lidocaine Infusion1.5

[back to top]

American Shoulder Elbow Society Score

Outcome Instrument high is good low is bad 0-100 The ASES is a condition-specific scale that is intended to measure functional limitations and pain of the shoulder. (NCT04216017)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Controls46
Cases87

[back to top]

Visual Analogue Scale

pain scale - high is bad - low is good 0-100 (NCT04216017)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Controls4
Cases1

[back to top]

Pain Score 6 Hours After Osmotic Dilator Insertion

Median pain score on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) numeric rating scale 6 hours after osmotic dilator insertion assessed via text message (NCT04254081)
Timeframe: 6 hours after osmotic dilator insertion

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Buprenorphine 0.15mg + 1% Lidocaine Paracervical Block3
1% Lidocaine Paracervical Block3

[back to top]

Pain Score at the Time of Osmotic Dilator Insertion

Median pain score on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) numeric rating scale at the time of osmotic dilator insertion (NCT04254081)
Timeframe: Assessed immediately after last dilator inserted

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Buprenorphine 0.15mg + 1% Lidocaine Paracervical Block3.5
1% Lidocaine Paracervical Block4.0

[back to top]

Pain Score 1 Hour After Osmotic Dilator Insertion

Median pain score on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) numeric rating scale 1 hour after osmotic dilator insertion assessed via text message (NCT04254081)
Timeframe: 1 hour after osmotic dilator insertion

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Buprenorphine 0.15mg + 1% Lidocaine Paracervical Block2
1% Lidocaine Paracervical Block3.5

[back to top]

Pain Score 2 Hours After Osmotic Dilator Insertion

Median pain score on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) numeric rating scale 2 hours after osmotic dilator insertion assessed via text message (NCT04254081)
Timeframe: 2 hours after osmotic dilator insertion

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Buprenorphine 0.15mg + 1% Lidocaine Paracervical Block3
1% Lidocaine Paracervical Block3.5

[back to top]

Pain as Measured by a 11 Point Verbal Scale

scale ranges form 0-10, higher number indicating more pain (NCT04369950)
Timeframe: 4,8, 12 and 24 hours after epidural morphine administration

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
4 hours8 hours12 hours24 hours
2 Percent Lidocaine With Epinephrine and Epidural Morphine0037
3 Percent 2-Chloroprocaine and Epidural Morphine2.5123.5

[back to top]

Total Amount of Opioid Used

(NCT04369950)
Timeframe: 4 hours after epidural morphine administration

Interventionhours (Median)
2 Percent Lidocaine With Epinephrine and Epidural Morphine0
3 Percent 2-Chloroprocaine and Epidural Morphine0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Had Mild, Moderate or Severe Pruritis as Measured by a 3 Point Scale

scale ranges from non,mild and moderate-severe (NCT04369950)
Timeframe: 4,8, 12 and 24 hours after epidural morphine administration

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
4 hours8 hours12 hours24 hours
2 Percent Lidocaine With Epinephrine and Epidural Morphine7642
3 Percent 2-Chloroprocaine and Epidural Morphine3430

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Had Mild, Moderate or Severe Nausea as Measured by a 3 Point Scale

scale ranges from non,mild and moderate-severe (NCT04369950)
Timeframe: 4,8, 12 and 24 hours after epidural morphine administration

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
4 hours8 hours12 hours24 hours
2 Percent Lidocaine With Epinephrine and Epidural Morphine3100
3 Percent 2-Chloroprocaine and Epidural Morphine1200

[back to top]

Total Amount of Opioid Used

(NCT04369950)
Timeframe: 8 hours after epidural morphine administration

Interventionhours (Median)
2 Percent Lidocaine With Epinephrine and Epidural Morphine0
3 Percent 2-Chloroprocaine and Epidural Morphine0

[back to top]

Total Amount of Opioid Used

(NCT04369950)
Timeframe: 12 hours after epidural morphine administration

Interventionhours (Median)
2 Percent Lidocaine With Epinephrine and Epidural Morphine0
3 Percent 2-Chloroprocaine and Epidural Morphine0

[back to top]

Time Until First Opioid Request

(NCT04369950)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hours after epidural morphine administration

Interventionhours (Median)
2 Percent Lidocaine With Epinephrine and Epidural Morphine14.8
3 Percent 2-Chloroprocaine and Epidural Morphine24.7

[back to top]

Total Amount of Opioid Used

(NCT04369950)
Timeframe: 24 hours after epidural morphine administration

Interventionmilligrams (Median)
2 Percent Lidocaine With Epinephrine and Epidural Morphine15
3 Percent 2-Chloroprocaine and Epidural Morphine0

[back to top]

Subjective Pain

daily pain scores conducted by the nursing staff every morning and prior to medication administration. This will be a repeated measure using the subjective 0-10 pain scale. The scores will be averaged over each 24 hour (day) period and then compared. Lower scores indicate less pain. (NCT04443569)
Timeframe: the first 72 hours post-operative, up to 4 days

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Post-Op Day 1Post-Op Day 2Post-Op Day 3Post-Op Day 4
Control Group4.15.24.34.5
Lidocaine Patch Group3.55.25.25.7

[back to top]

Narcotic Use

The primary outcome of this study would be the total average milligrams of narcotic, or opioid, medication that a patient receives calculated in morphine equivalents (NCT04443569)
Timeframe: the first 72 hours post-operative

Interventionmg morphine equivalents (Mean)
Lidocaine Patch Group51.3
Control Group29.7

[back to top]

Effect of TIVA With Ketofol and Ketofol Plus Lidocaine on Extubation Time in Children

(NCT04467424)
Timeframe: up to 600 seconds

Interventionsecond (Median)
Pediatric Anesthesia With Ketofol240
Pediatric Anesthesia With Ketofol Plus Lidocaine120

[back to top]

Effect of TIVA With Ketofol and Ketofol Plus Lidocaine on Total Opioid Consumption

(NCT04467424)
Timeframe: up to 60 minutes

Interventionmicrogram per kg (Median)
Pediatric Anesthesia With Ketofol2.3
Pediatric Anesthesia With Ketofol Plus Lidocaine2.1

[back to top]

Effect of TIVA With Ketofol and Ketofol Plus Lidocaine on Length of Stay in the PACU

(NCT04467424)
Timeframe: up to 40 minutes

Interventionminute (Median)
Pediatric Anesthesia With Ketofol35
Pediatric Anesthesia With Ketofol Plus Lidocaine20

[back to top]

Skin Wheal Pain Score

Participants rated their pain level from the creation of the skin wheal using each anesthetic on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain. (NCT04495868)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Bacteriostatic Normal Saline5
1% Lidocaine6

[back to top]

Needle Placement Pain Score

Participants rated their pain level from the insertion of the needle for the lumbar medial branch block using the skin wheal created with each anesthetic. Pain is rated on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain. (NCT04495868)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Bacteriostatic Normal Saline0
1% Lidocaine0

[back to top]

Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty

The quality of recovery-15 is a validated questionnaire to assess postoperative recovery. I Scale is based on 15 questions, each question score range is 0-10 (0 being poor and 10 being excellent) The survey will be conducted at 24 hours after surgery Total score range is 0-150, where a score of 0 would be the worst possible score, and 150 would be the best possible score. (NCT04591353)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
"Investigational Group (PENG Block Group)"131.5
Control Group103

[back to top]

Total Post-operative Opioid Requirements With Non-opioid Drug Regimen

Total post-operative opioid requirements (opioid dose) were calculated for participants receiving the non-opioid drug regimen, among participants who required post-operative opioid medication. (NCT04766996)
Timeframe: Up to 5 weeks

Interventionmilligrams (Mean)
Prospective Cases Undergoing Non-opioid Drug Regimen400

[back to top]

Nebraska Interprofessional Education Attitude Scale (NIPEAS) Score for Professional Staff Arm

The Nebraska Interprofessional Education Attitude Scale (NIPEAS) was developed to measure the attitudes of pre-clinical learners to practicing health professionals. The NIPEAS is a 19-item questionnaire assessing attitudes related to interprofessional collaboration. Responses were given using a 5-point Likert scale where 1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree. The total score is the average of the average scores for each item and ranges from 1 to 5. A higher total score indicates increased positive perceptions toward interprofessional collaboration. (NCT04766996)
Timeframe: Prior to protocol implementation (baseline), halfway through the recruitment period (2 months) and after the last participant has been discharged from the hospital (4 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline
Professional Staff4.35

[back to top]

Short Form McGill VAS Pain Score

"Visual analog scale pain score out of 100 with zero being no pain and 100 being worst possible pain" (NCT04822597)
Timeframe: Day of surgery (last of two study visits), assessed within 3 hours of radioactive tracer injection

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Ice Pack24
Buzzy(R)28
Lidocaine Patch27
Lidocaine Patch and Buzzy(R)33

[back to top]

Short Form McGill Sensory Pain Score

"Sensory pain score out of 33 with 0 being no pain and 33 being severe sensory pain" (NCT04822597)
Timeframe: Day of surgery (last of two study visits), assessed within 3 hours of radioactive tracer injection

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Ice Pack1
Buzzy(R)1
Lidocaine Patch2
Lidocaine Patch and Buzzy(R)2

[back to top]

Short Form McGill Combined Pain Score

"Combination of outcomes 2-3. Additive total score between 0 and 45 with zero being no pain and 45 being severe pain" (NCT04822597)
Timeframe: Day of surgery (last of two study visits), assessed within 3 hours of radioactive tracer injection

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Ice Pack4
Buzzy(R)3
Lidocaine Patch6
Lidocaine Patch and Buzzy(R)3

[back to top]

"Recommendation of Pain Control Modality as Measured by Number of Participants Who Answered Yes"

"Yes, No, Not sure with option for free response" (NCT04822597)
Timeframe: Day of surgery (last of two study visits), assessed within 3 hours of radioactive tracer injection

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ice Pack31
Buzzy(R)31
Lidocaine Patch35
Lidocaine Patch and Buzzy(R)35

[back to top]

Degree of Anxiety During the Injection as Measured by Number of Participants Moderately Anxious

"1-4 scale with 1 being very anxious and 4 being not at all anxious, reported here are the number of participants rating anxiety at 2 or moderate." (NCT04822597)
Timeframe: Day of surgery (last of two study visits), assessed within 3 hours of radioactive tracer injection

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ice Pack33
Buzzy(R)24
Lidocaine Patch32
Lidocaine Patch and Buzzy(R)25

[back to top] [back to top]

Degree of Participant Satisfaction With Care Provided During Injection as Reported by Number of Participants Who Report Satisfied or Very Satisfied

"1-6 scale with 1 being very satisfied and 6 being very dissatisfied. Reported are the number of participants satisfied or very satisfied." (NCT04822597)
Timeframe: Day of surgery (last of two study visits), assessed within 3 hours of radioactive tracer injection

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ice Pack42
Buzzy(R)37
Lidocaine Patch42
Lidocaine Patch and Buzzy(R)37

[back to top]

Degree of Participant Satisfaction With Pain Control as Reported by Number of Participants Who Report Satisfied or Very Satisfied

"1-6 scale with 1 being very satisfied and 6 being very dissatisfied. Reported are the number of participants satisfied or very satisfied." (NCT04822597)
Timeframe: Day of surgery (last of two study visits), assessed within 3 hours of radioactive tracer injection

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ice Pack33
Buzzy(R)33
Lidocaine Patch36
Lidocaine Patch and Buzzy(R)36

[back to top]

Median Post-Procedural Pain Score

"Post-procedural pain score on the Wong-Baker FACES scale. Scale from 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain." (NCT04822597)
Timeframe: Day of surgery (last of two study visits), assessed within 3 hours of radioactive tracer injection

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Ice Pack2
Buzzy(R)2
Lidocaine Patch4
Lidocaine Patch and Buzzy(R)4

[back to top]

Provider Perceived Ease of Administration

"7 point single ease question to rate ease of a task. 1 being very difficult and 7 being very easy. This is the provider's perception of the how easy the intervention was to administer." (NCT04822597)
Timeframe: Day of surgery (last of two study visits), assessed within 30 minutes of radioactive tracer injection

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Ice Pack7
Buzzy(R)6
Lidocaine Patch7
Lidocaine Patch and Buzzy(R)6

[back to top]

Provider Perceived Participant Pain

"11 point numeric rating scale for perceived pain of others. 0 being no pain and 7-10 being severe pain." (NCT04822597)
Timeframe: Day of surgery, assessed within 30 minutes of radioactive tracer injection

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Ice Pack3
Buzzy(R)3
Lidocaine Patch4
Lidocaine Patch and Buzzy(R)3

[back to top]

Short Form McGill Affective Pain Score

"Affective pain score out of 12 with 0 being no pain and 12 being severe affective pain" (NCT04822597)
Timeframe: Day of surgery (last of two study visits), assessed within 3 hours of radioactive tracer injection

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Ice Pack0
Buzzy(R)0
Lidocaine Patch0
Lidocaine Patch and Buzzy(R)0

[back to top]

(ICDSC)Delirium After Stop Sedation by Using Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist

delirium in the direct postoperative phase, by using the ICDSC (Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist) score. The ICDSC is score-based (range 0-8) where the ICDSC is positive when any four (or more) symptoms of delirium are present (i.e., altered level of consciousness, inattention, disorientation, hallucinations or delusions, psychomotor activity, inappropriate speech or mood, sleep disturbance or fluctuation of symptoms) (NCT04987372)
Timeframe: At 48 h after surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Classical Protocol0.0
Multimodal Protocol0.0

[back to top]

Postoperative Pain After Cardiac Surgery

By using a NRS scale postoperative pain (at rest) at 48hours after cardiac surgery In a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), patients are asked to circle the number between 0 and 10 . Zero usually represents 'no pain at all' whereas 10 represents 'the worst pain ever possible'. (NCT04987372)
Timeframe: At 48 hours after cardiac surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Classical Protocol2.28
Multimodal Protocol2.17

[back to top]

Post-operative Narcotic Use

Post-operative narcotic use will be monitored with self-reported medication consumption at the first post-operative visit, which will take place 5-12 days post-operative. The milligrams of morphine equivalent (MME) will be calculated based on patient responses with greater MME indicative of increased postoperative use of narcotic pain medications. (NCT05149287)
Timeframe: 5-12 days post-operative

Interventionmilligrams of morphine equivalent (MME) (Mean)
Experimental15
Placebo5.5

[back to top]

Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score

The Visual analog scale scores range from 0 to 10 with greater scores indicative of greater pain. (NCT05149287)
Timeframe: Pre-operative, 2 months post-operative

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Experimental-2.67
Placebo-2.1

[back to top]

Change in RU SATED Score

The Regularity, Sleep Quality, Alertness, Timing, Efficiency, Duration scale for sleep (RU SATED) ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better sleep health. (NCT05149287)
Timeframe: Pre-operative, 2 months post-operative

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Experimental1
Placebo-0.5

[back to top]

Duration of Surgery

(NCT05867342)
Timeframe: intraoperatively (up to 3 hours)

Interventionminutes (Mean)
1:1000 Epinephrine Plus Saline72.05
1:1000 Epinephrine Plus Infiltration of 1% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine54.23

[back to top]

Number of Days With Postoperative Bloody Nasal Discharge

Participants indicated number of days with bloody nasal discharge postoperatively using the 1-week postoperative bleeding questionnaire. (NCT05867342)
Timeframe: 1 week after the surgery (up to 2 minutes to complete assessment)

Interventiondays (Mean)
1:1000 Epinephrine Plus Saline2.85
1:1000 Epinephrine Plus Infiltration of 1% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine2.73

[back to top]

Number of Extra Pledgets Used

A pledget is a small wad of absorbent material used to stop bleeding. (NCT05867342)
Timeframe: intraoperatively (up to 3 hours)

Interventionpledgets (Mean)
1:1000 Epinephrine Plus Saline3.25
1:1000 Epinephrine Plus Infiltration of 1% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine2.63

[back to top]

Number of Nostrils With Continuous Fresh Bleeding

Number of nostrils with excessive fresh bleeding postoperatively using the 1-week postoperative bleeding questionnaire. Continuous fresh bleeding was defined as bleeding for over 15 minutes. (NCT05867342)
Timeframe: 1 week after the surgery (up to 2 minutes to complete assessment)

Interventionnostrils (Count of Units)
1:1000 Epinephrine Plus Saline7
1:1000 Epinephrine Plus Infiltration of 1% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine5

[back to top]

Postoperative Bloody Discharge Grading Score

Grading of postoperative bloody discharge postoperatively assessed by patient using the 1-week postoperative bleeding questionnaire. Scores range from 0 (no bleeding) to 5 (continuous heavy bleeding necessitating medical care). (NCT05867342)
Timeframe: 1 week after the surgery (up to 2 minutes to complete assessment)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
1:1000 Epinephrine Plus Saline2.38
1:1000 Epinephrine Plus Infiltration of 1% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine2.2

[back to top]

Surgical Field Grading Score

The video recording of the endoscopic sinus surgery of the participant was graded by another otolaryngology specialist postoperatively and graded according to Wormald Surgical Field Grading Scale. Scores range from 0 (no bleeding) to 10 (severe bleeding with nasal cavity filling rapidly). (NCT05867342)
Timeframe: postoperatively (approximately 20 minutes to assess)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
1:1000 Epinephrine Plus Saline3.54
1:1000 Epinephrine Plus Infiltration of 1% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine3.23

[back to top]

Estimated Blood Loss During Surgery

(NCT05867342)
Timeframe: intraoperatively (up to 3 hours)

InterventionmL (Mean)
1:1000 Epinephrine Plus Saline95.25
1:1000 Epinephrine Plus Infiltration of 1% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine91.63

[back to top]