Page last updated: 2024-10-28

lidocaine and Impotence

lidocaine has been researched along with Impotence in 12 studies

Lidocaine: A local anesthetic and cardiac depressant used as an antiarrhythmia agent. Its actions are more intense and its effects more prolonged than those of PROCAINE but its duration of action is shorter than that of BUPIVACAINE or PRILOCAINE.
lidocaine : The monocarboxylic acid amide resulting from the formal condensation of N,N-diethylglycine with 2,6-dimethylaniline.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Lidocaine 1% can be safely and usefully combined with intracorporeal prostaglandin E1 in the treatment of erectile dysfunction with alleviation of pain and enhancement of erectile effect."9.08Double-blind randomized crossover study comparing intracorporeal prostaglandin E1 with combination of prostaglandin E1 and lidocaine in the treatment of organic impotence. ( Kattan, S, 1995)
"Lidocaine 1% can be safely and usefully combined with intracorporeal prostaglandin E1 in the treatment of erectile dysfunction with alleviation of pain and enhancement of erectile effect."5.08Double-blind randomized crossover study comparing intracorporeal prostaglandin E1 with combination of prostaglandin E1 and lidocaine in the treatment of organic impotence. ( Kattan, S, 1995)

Research

Studies (12)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19903 (25.00)18.7374
1990's4 (33.33)18.2507
2000's4 (33.33)29.6817
2010's1 (8.33)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Shafik, A1
Shafik, AA1
Shafik, IA1
El Sibai, O1
Angeloni, NL1
Bond, CW1
Monsivais, D1
Tang, Y1
Podlasek, CA1
Xin, ZC1
Zhu, YC1
Yuan, YM1
Cui, WS1
Jin, Z1
Li, WR1
Liu, T1
Henry, R1
Morales, A1
Hsu, GL1
Hsieh, CH1
Wen, HS1
Chen, SC1
Chen, YC1
Liu, LJ1
Mok, MS1
Wu, CH1
Kattan, S1
Dos Reis, JM1
Glina, S1
Da Silva, MF1
Furlan, V1
Palmer, JM1
Link, D1
Schouman, M1
Lacroix, P1
Amer, M1
Fein, RL1
Reiss, HF1
Henriet, R1

Clinical Trials (1)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase IIb, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study, With Open-label Follow on, to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of PSD502 in Subjects With Premature Ejaculation (PE)[NCT00556478]Phase 2/Phase 3256 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change in Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) From Baseline to Month 3

Summary of mean IELT at Baseline and at month 3 during double-blind treatment (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: 3 months

InterventionSeconds (Geometric Mean)
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active140.964
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active49.615

Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT): Change From Baseline to During 3 Month Double Blind-treatment

"To evaluate efficacy of treatment with PSD502 compared with placebo in subjects with PE as measured by:~• change in mean IELT from baseline to during the 3 month double-blind treatment~Results provide are ratio (over the 3 months/baseline)." (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 Months

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active4.607
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active1.505

Change in the Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE) Domains of Ejaculatory Control, Distress and Sexual Satisfaction From Baseline to Month 1

"Change in the IPE domains of ejaculatory control, distress and sexual satisfaction from Baseline to month 1.~Ejaculatory control scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater ejaculatory control Sexual satisfaction scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater sexual satisfaction Distress scores range from 2 to 10 with a higher score indicating less distress" (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: 1 month

,
InterventionScore (Mean)
Ejaculatory controlDistressSexual satisfaction
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active5.72.55.1
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active1.30.61.8

Change in the Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE) Domains of Ejaculatory Control, Distress and Sexual Satisfaction From Baseline to Month 2

"Change in the IPE domains of ejaculatory control, distress and sexual satisfaction from Baseline to month 2~Ejaculatory control scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater ejaculatory control Sexual satisfaction scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater sexual satisfaction Distress scores range from 2 to 10 with a higher score indicating less distress" (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: 2 months

,
InterventionScore (Mean)
ControlSatisfactionDistress
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active6.55.82.9
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active1.41.30.7

Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE): Change From Baseline to End of Month 3

"To Evaluate Efficacy of Treatment With PSD502 Compared With Placebo in Subjects With PE as measured by:~• changes in all 3 IPE domains from baseline to month 3~Ejaculatory control scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater ejaculatory control Sexual satisfaction scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater sexual satisfaction Distress scores range from 2 to 10 with a higher score indicating less distress" (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 Months

,
InterventionScore (Mean)
Ejaculatory controlSexual satisfactionDistress
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active7.26.63.5
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active2.22.10.9

Partner Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) at Month 3

Scores for perceived control over ejaculation, personal distress related to ejaculation, satisfaction with sexual intercourse and interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation based on the partner PEP at month 3. Proportion of partners with at least a 1 point category improvement in partner PEP domain scores from baseline to month 3. (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: 3 months

,
Interventionpercentage of partners (Number)
ControlDistressSexual satisfactionInterpersonal difficulty
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active68.964.962.866.9
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active40.850.032.950.0

Percentage of Subjects With Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) > 1 Minute and >2 Minutes During the 3 Months of Double-blind Treatment

Percentage of subjects with mean IELT > 1 minute and >2 minutes during the 3 months of double-blind treatment as measured by the proportion of subjects (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: 3 months

,
Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
IELT > 1 minuteIELT > 2 minutes
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active80.257.5
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active37.814.6

Subject PEP at Month 1

Scores for perceived control over ejaculation, personal distress related to ejaculation, satisfaction with sexual intercourse and interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation based on the subject PEP at month 1. Percentage of subjects with at least a 1 point category improvement in subject PEP domain scores at month 1. (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: 1 month

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ControlDistressSexual satisfactionInterpersonal difficulty
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active59.663.462.772.0
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active23.527.233.351.9

Subject Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) at Month 2

Scores for perceived control over ejaculation, personal distress related to ejaculation, satisfaction with sexual intercourse and interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation based on the subject PEP at month 2. Proportion of subjects with at least a 1 point category improvement in subject PEP domain scores from baseline to month 2. (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: 2 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ControlDistressSexual satisfactionInterpersonal difficulty
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active67.570.169.475.8
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active24.733.827.342.9

Subject Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) at Month 3

Scores for perceived control over ejaculation, personal distress related to ejaculation, satisfaction with sexual intercourse and interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation based on the subject PEP at month 3. Proportion of subjects with at least a 1 point category improvement in subject PEP domain scores from baseline to month 3. (NCT00556478)
Timeframe: 3 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ControlDistressSexual satisfactionInterpersonal difficulty
Double-Blind Active / Open-Label Active72.476.973.777.6
Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active24.136.736.759.5

Reviews

1 review available for lidocaine and Impotence

ArticleYear
Current therapeutic strategies for premature ejaculation and future perspectives.
    Asian journal of andrology, 2011, Volume: 13, Issue:4

    Topics: Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Drug Combinations; Ejaculat

2011

Trials

2 trials available for lidocaine and Impotence

ArticleYear
Percutaneous perineal electrostimulation induces erection: clinical significance in patients with spinal cord injury and erectile dysfunction.
    The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2008, Volume: 31, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Anesthetics, Local; Electric Stimulation; Erectile Dysfunction; Humans;

2008
Double-blind randomized crossover study comparing intracorporeal prostaglandin E1 with combination of prostaglandin E1 and lidocaine in the treatment of organic impotence.
    Urology, 1995, Volume: 45, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Alprostadil; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Erectile Dys

1995

Other Studies

9 other studies available for lidocaine and Impotence

ArticleYear
The role of hedgehog-interacting protein in maintaining cavernous nerve integrity and adult penile morphology.
    The journal of sexual medicine, 2009, Volume: 6, Issue:9

    Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Erectile Dysfunction; Hedgehog Proteins; Lidocaine; Male; Nitric Oxide; Penis; R

2009
Topical lidocaine-prilocaine spray for the treatment of premature ejaculation: a proof of concept study.
    International journal of impotence research, 2003, Volume: 15, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Aerosols; Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Ejaculation; Erectile Dysfunctio

2003
Outpatient penile implantation with the patient under a novel method of crural block.
    International journal of andrology, 2004, Volume: 27, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Anesthesia, Local; Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Lidoca

2004
Penile prosthesis surgery with the patient under local regional anesthesia.
    The Journal of urology, 1993, Volume: 150, Issue:4

    Topics: Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Anesthesia, Local; Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Mi

1993
Impotence following anesthesia for elective circumcision.
    JAMA, 1979, Jun-15, Volume: 241, Issue:24

    Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Vessels; Circumcision, Male; Epithelium; Erectile Dysfunction; Human

1979
Suppression of prostaglandin E1-induced pain by dilution of the drug with lidocaine before intracavernous injection.
    The Journal of urology, 1992, Volume: 148, Issue:4

    Topics: Alprostadil; Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Injections; Lidocaine; Male; Pain; Penis

1992
Duraphase penile prosthesis dorsal approach using local anesthesia.
    Urology, 1991, Volume: 38, Issue:4

    Topics: Anesthesia, Local; Bupivacaine; Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Penile Prosthesis; Pe

1991
Re: Penile pharmacocavernosography and cavernosometry in the evaluation of impotence.
    The Journal of urology, 1989, Volume: 142, Issue:3

    Topics: Anesthesia, Local; Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Penile Erection; Penis; Radiograph

1989
[Priapism and impotence. Argument for early incision of the corpus cavernosum].
    Journal d'urologie et de nephrologie, 1968, Volume: 74, Issue:6

    Topics: Chymotrypsin; Cystoscopy; Dextrans; Erectile Dysfunction; Hematoma; Hematuria; Heparin; Humans; Kidn

1968