Page last updated: 2024-11-04

citalopram

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Citalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant. It was first synthesized in the 1980s and was approved for medical use in 1989. Citalopram works by increasing the levels of serotonin in the brain. Serotonin is a neurotransmitter that plays a role in regulating mood, sleep, appetite, and other functions. By increasing serotonin levels, citalopram helps to alleviate symptoms of depression, anxiety, and other mental health conditions. Citalopram is generally well-tolerated, but it can cause side effects such as nausea, headache, and sexual dysfunction. It is important to note that citalopram should not be taken by pregnant women or breastfeeding mothers. Citalopram is an important medication for the treatment of depression and other mental health conditions. It is widely prescribed and has been shown to be effective in reducing symptoms and improving quality of life. Research on citalopram continues to focus on understanding its mechanisms of action, identifying new therapeutic applications, and optimizing its use in clinical practice.'

Citalopram: A furancarbonitrile that is one of the serotonin uptake inhibitors used as an antidepressant. The drug is also effective in reducing ethanol uptake in alcoholics and is used in depressed patients who also suffer from TARDIVE DYSKINESIA in preference to tricyclic antidepressants, which aggravate dyskinesia. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

citalopram : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of (R)-citalopram and its enantiomer, escitalopram. It is used as an antidepressant, although only escitalopram is active. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydro-2-benzofuran-5-carbonitrile : A nitrile that is 1,3-dihydro-2-benzofuran-5-carbonitrile in which one of the hydrogens at position 1 is replaced by a p-fluorophenyl group, while the other is replaced by a 3-(dimethylamino)propyl group. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID2771
CHEMBL ID549
CHEBI ID77397
CHEBI ID3723
SCHEMBL ID946
MeSH IDM0023529

Synonyms (120)

Synonym
AB00513896-11
BRD-A47598013-004-02-0
MLS000028578
nitalapram
cipram
lu-10-171
1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydro-2-benzofuran-5-carbonitrile
1,3-dihydro-1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-isobenzofurancarbonitrile
lu 10-171
5-isobenzofurancarbonitrile, 1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydro-
citalopramum [inn-latin]
einecs 261-891-1
cytalopram
1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-1-(p-fluorophenyl)-5-phthalancarbonitrile
5-isobenzofurancarbonitrile, 1,3-dihydro-1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-
1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-3h-isobenzofuran-5-carbonitrile
1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydro[3,4]benzofuran-5-carbonitrile
hsdb 7042
celexa
BPBIO1_000929
LOPAC0_000258
citadur (tn)
citalopram (usp/inn)
D07704
BSPBIO_000843
[3h]cytalopram
bdbm25870
chembl549 ,
[3h]lexapro
[3h]escitalopram
[3h]citalopram
AB00513896
citalopram
C07572
59729-33-8
DB00215
smr000465669
PRESTWICK3_000692
NCGC00025160-02
HMS2090O09
HMS2093A14
inchi=1/c20h21fn2o/c1-23(2)11-3-10-20(17-5-7-18(21)8-6-17)19-9-4-15(13-22)12-16(19)14-24-20/h4-9,12h,3,10-11,14h2,1-2h3
wseqxvzvjxjvfp-uhfffaoysa-
NCGC00015267-07
L001223
chebi:77397 ,
citadur
STL058639
FT-0657967
FT-0660873
1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-3h-2-benzofuran-5-carbonitrile
A832440
1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran-5-carbonitrile ,
[3h]-citalopram
HMS3259B10
1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran-5-carb onitrile
CCG-204353
AKOS005711003
NCGC00015267-04
NCGC00015267-05
0dhu5b8d6v ,
citalopramum
perrigo citalopram
citalopram [usp:inn:ban]
unii-0dhu5b8d6v
NCGC00015267-09
gtpl4621
citalopram [vandf]
citalopram [mart.]
citalopram [usp impurity]
citalopram [inn]
citalopram [who-dd]
citalopram [mi]
gtpl7547
lu-10171b
AB00513896-09
NC00711
BBL029066
SCHEMBL946
bonitrile
5-isobenzofurancarbonitrile, 1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydro-
1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1-(p-fluorophenyl)-5-phthalancarbonitrile
1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran-5-carbonitrile
5-isobenzofurancarbonitrile,1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydro-
1-(3-dimethylamino-propyl)-1-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-1,3-dihydro-isobenzofuran-5-carbonitrile
5-cyano-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-1,3-dihydro-isobenzofuran
1-(3'-dimethylaminopropyl)-1-(4'-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran-5-carbonitrile
1-[3-(dimethylamino) propyl]-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydro-5-isobenzofuran carbonitrile
1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-1-(4'-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran-5-carbonitrile
MLS006011858
AB00513896_12
AB00513896_13
DTXSID8022826 ,
AC-8894
SR-01000003129-8
SBI-0050246.P002
MRF-0000302
NCGC00015267-12
1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydro-5-isobenzo[b]furancarbonitrile
Q409672
C3149
1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydro-5-isobenzofurancarbonitrile
BRD-A47598013-004-06-1
SDCCGSBI-0050246.P003
NCGC00015267-20
NCGC00015267-11
AS-76503
HY-121203
CS-0081223
EN300-304884
ps18 - citalopram/norcitalopram
citalopramum (latin)
n06ab04
citalopram (usp impurity)
citalopramum (inn-latin)
dtxcid802826
chebi:3723
citalopram (mart.)
citalopram (usp:inn:ban)
rac-1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydro-2-benzofuran-5-carbonitrile

Research Excerpts

Overview

Citalopram (CIT) is a highly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) frequently used in the treatment of major depressive disorders. It has demonstrated interesting repairing properties leading to motor recovery and pathology amelioration in animal models of stroke and degeneration.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Citalopram (CIT) is a highly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) frequently used in the treatment of major depressive disorders. "( Analytical methodologies for the enantiodetermination of citalopram and its metabolites.
Budău, M; Hancu, G; Muntean, DL; Rusu, A, 2020
)
2.25
"Citalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, and although widely used as an antidepressant, this drug has also demonstrated interesting repairing properties leading to motor recovery and pathology amelioration in animal models of stroke and degeneration. "( Citalopram Administration Does Not Promote Function or Histological Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury.
Assunção-Silva, R; Gomes, ED; Lima, R; Monteiro, S; Morais, M; Salgado, AJ; Silva, NA; Vasconcelos, NL, 2020
)
3.44
"Escitalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRIs) antidepressant, drug that is currently used as first-line agents for the treatment of depression and it is also used in the treatment of other psychiatric disorders. "( Sustained escitalopram administration affects glucose metabolism in the rat brain.
Berrocoso, E; Desco, M; Mico, JA; Perez-Caballero, L; Soto-Montenegro, ML, 2021
)
1.72
"Citalopram is a safe and tolerable medication in patients with acute IS, which could improve the outcome in these patients."( Efficacy of Citalopram on Acute Ischemic Stroke Outcome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Abbaszade, Z; Ghazanfari Amlashi, S; Golzari, SEJ; Hashemilar, M; Nikanfar, M; Rikhtegar, R; Sadeghi Bazargani, H; Sadeghihokmabadi, E; Savadi Oskouie, D; Sharifipour, E, 2017
)
2.28
"Citalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor used for treatment of depression. "( Citalopram overdose and severe serotonin syndrome in an intermediate metabolizing patient.
Morris, AJ; Picard, L; Schult, RF; Wiegand, TJ, 2019
)
3.4
"Citalopram (CIT) is an antidepressant drug from the group of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in which it is the most potent selective inhibitor of serotonin uptake currently available. "( How to combine non-compartmental analysis with the population pharmacokinetics? A study of tobacco smoke's influence on the bioavailability of racemic citalopram in rats.
Florek, E; Jawień, W; Kulza, M; Majcherczyk, J; Piekoszewski, W, 2013
)
2.03
"Citalopram is an antidepressant drug often prescribed to pregnant women."( Histological changes in the liver of fetuses of pregnant rats following citalopram administration.
Azarnia, M; Mirabolghasemi, G; Mohammadi, Z; Shiravi, A,
)
1.09
"Escitalopram appears to be a superior antidepressant to racemic citalopram. "( The interaction of escitalopram and R-citalopram at the human serotonin transporter investigated in the mouse.
Cajina, M; Caron, MG; Dalvi, P; Du, Y; Jacobsen, JP; Khoo, KS; Morillo, CS; O'Neill, SP; Pehrson, AL; Plenge, P; Roberts, W; Robinson, TJ; Rudder, ML; Sachs, BD; Zhang, X, 2014
)
1.44
"Citalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) with cardiac and neurologic toxicities as well as the potential for serotonin syndrome. "( Citalopram Overdose: a Fatal Case.
Kraai, EP; Seifert, SA, 2015
)
3.3
"Escitalopram is a commonly prescribed antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor class. "( In vivo investigation of escitalopram's allosteric site on the serotonin transporter.
Murray, KE; Owens, MJ; Ressler, KJ, 2016
)
1.45
"Citalopram is an antidepressant drug, which acts by inhibiting the re-uptake of serotonin from the synaptic cleft into the pre-synaptic nerve ending. "( Waterborne citalopram has anxiolytic effects and increases locomotor activity in the three-spine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus).
Hallgren, S; Hansen, SH; Kellner, M; Olsén, KH; Porsch-Hällström, I; Porseryd, T, 2016
)
2.27
"Citalopram (CTR) is a worldwide highly consumed antidepressant which has demonstrated incomplete removal by conventional wastewater treatment. "( Identification of biotransformation products of citalopram formed in activated sludge.
Aalizadeh, R; Beretsou, VG; Fenner, K; Gago-Ferrero, P; Psoma, AK; Thomaidis, NS, 2016
)
2.13
"Citalopram is a clinically applied selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor for antidepressant pharmacotherapy. "( The allosteric citalopram binding site differentially interferes with neuronal firing rate and SERT trafficking in serotonergic neurons.
Bahri, S; Haddjeri, N; Lau, T; Martí, Y; Matthäus, F; Rovera, R; Sánchez, C; Schloss, P, 2016
)
2.23
"S-citalopram is a drug used to treat depression and anxiety by binding to the serotonin transporter with high-affinity, blocking serotonin reuptake."( Thermostabilization, Expression, Purification, and Crystallization of the Human Serotonin Transporter Bound to S-citalopram.
Coleman, JA; Gouaux, E; Green, EM, 2016
)
1.2
"Citalopram is a substrate for 2C19 and inhibition of its metabolism may result in serotonin toxicity."( Life-threatening serotonin toxicity due to a citalopram-fluconazole drug interaction: case reports and discussion.
Cortes-Ladino, A; Levin, TT; Palomba, ML; Weiss, M,
)
1.11
"Escitalopram (ESC) is a novel selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor that seems to have a favorable side effect profile."( The safety of the electroconvulsive therapy-escitalopram combination.
Florakis, A; Markatou, M; Masdrakis, VG; Oulis, P; Papadimitriou, GN; Valamoutopoulos, T, 2008
)
1.16
"Citalopram (Séropram) is an antidepressant of the selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class, composed of equal amounts of S-enantiomer, escitalopram, and R-enantiomer, R-citalopram. "( [Escitalopram: a selective inhibitor and allosteric modulator of the serotonin transporter].
El Mansari, M; Haddjeri, N; Mnie-Filali, O; Sánchez, C; Scarna, H; Zimmer, L, 2007
)
2.4
"Escitalopram is a good therapeutic option for the long-term treatment of MDD, particularly in severely depressed patients."( Superiority of escitalopram to paroxetine in the treatment of depression.
Baldwin, DS; Boulenger, JP; Kasper, S; Larsson Lönn, S, 2009
)
1.25
"Escitalopram (ES-CIT) is a widely used, highly specific antidepressant. "( Effects of escitalopram on the regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and nerve growth factor protein levels in a rat model of chronic stress.
Abumaria, N; Danker-Hopfe, H; Fuchs, E; Hellweg, R; Hiemke, C; Schulte-Herbrüggen, O; Ziegler, A, 2009
)
1.44
"Citalopram is a racemic mixture of equal proportions of the S(+) and R(-) enantiomers."( Specific effects of escitalopram on neuroendocrine response.
Delva, NJ; Hawken, ER; Hudson, RW; Owen, JA, 2009
)
1.39
"Escitalopram is a stronger and safer SSRI with an earlier onset of action."( [Mechanism of action of new generation antidepressants under development in Japan: focusing on dopamine neurotransmission].
Nakayama, K, 2009
)
0.91
"Escitalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), and is the second antidepressant to be approved for use in treating major depressive disorder (MDD) in adolescent patients (aged 12-17 years) in the US. "( Escitalopram: in the treatment of major depressive disorder in adolescent patients.
Scott, LJ; Yang, LP, 2010
)
1.8
"Citalopram is an effective, well-tolerated agent in managing hot flashes. "( Phase III, placebo-controlled trial of three doses of citalopram for the treatment of hot flashes: NCCTG trial N05C9.
Atherton, PJ; Barton, DL; Diekmann, B; Dyar, M; Flynn, KA; Johnson, DB; LaVasseur, BI; Loprinzi, CL; Sloan, JA; Stawis, AN, 2010
)
2.05
"Escitalopram is a serotonin reuptake inhibitor used in the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders. "( Involvement of NMDA receptors and L-arginine-nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway in the antidepressant-like effects of escitalopram in the forced swimming test.
Engel, D; Gabilan, NH; Rodrigues, AL; Zomkowski, AD, 2010
)
1.28
"Escitalopram is a widely used antidepressant for the treatment of patients with major depression. "( Escitalopram, an antidepressant with an allosteric effect at the serotonin transporter--a review of current understanding of its mechanism of action.
Haddjeri, N; Sánchez, C; Zhong, H, 2012
)
1.82
"Citalopram (CIT) is a widely used antidepressant which acts by a selective serotonin reuptake inhibition. "( Correlation of QTc interval prolongation and serum level of citalopram after intoxication--a case report.
Deckert, J; Pfuhlmann, B; Unterecker, S; Warrings, B, 2012
)
2.06
"Escitalopram is a serotonin reuptake inhibitor prescribed for depression and anxiety. "( Pregnancy outcomes following use of escitalopram: a prospective comparative cohort study.
Einarson, A; Einarson, T; Klieger-Grossmann, C; Koren, G; Panchaud, A; Pistelli, A; Weitzner, B, 2012
)
1.37
"Citalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with a favorable cardiac-safety profile. "( Prolonged QTc interval and torsades de pointes induced by citalopram.
Abuissa, H; Airey, K; Alla, V; Deshmukh, A; Ulveling, K, 2012
)
2.07
"Citalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), widely used in the treatment of depressive disorders. "( 5-HT(3) receptor mediates the dose-dependent effects of citalopram on pentylenetetrazole-induced clonic seizure in mice: involvement of nitric oxide.
Amouzegar, A; Bahremand, A; Dehpour, AR; Payandemehr, B; Rahimian, R; Sharifzadeh, M; Ziai, P, 2012
)
2.07
"Escitalopram is an antidepressant drug shown to reverse the depressive-like features caused by this stress model."( Escitalopram improves memory deficits induced by maternal separation in the rat.
Batalha, VL; Couto, FS; Data-Franca, J; Lopes, LV; Ribeiro, JA; Valadas, JS, 2012
)
1.66
"Citalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant that is widely used in clinical practice. "( Citalopram and cardiac toxicity.
Cooke, MJ; Waring, WS, 2013
)
3.28
"Citalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) mainly prescribed to treat major depression."( Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability comparison of generic and branded citalopram 20 mg tablets: an open-label, randomized-sequence, two-period crossover study in healthy Chinese CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers.
Chen, B; Chen, C; Chen, H; Jiang, T; Li, H; Lu, Y; Rong, Z; Shen, Y; Sun, J; Xie, Y; Xu, Y, 2013
)
2.07
"Citalopram appears to be a safe and effective treatment for compulsive shopping. "( Citalopram treatment of compulsive shopping: an open-label study.
Bullock, KD; D'Andrea, V; Elliott, MA; Hartston, HJ; Koran, LM, 2002
)
3.2
"Escitalopram is a new antidepressant drug, available for clinical use in many countries. "( Escitalopram: efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of depression.
Baldwin, DS, 2002
)
1.76
"Citalopram alone is an efficacious treatment for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with depression. "( Efficacy of citalopram as a monotherapy or as an adjunctive treatment to estrogen therapy for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with depression and vasomotor symptoms.
Alexander, AB; Cohen, LS; Poitras, JR; Prouty, J; Shifren, JL; Soares, CN, 2003
)
2.14
"Escitalopram is a very selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor. "( Escitalopram, the S-(+)-enantiomer of citalopram, is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with potent effects in animal models predictive of antidepressant and anxiolytic activities.
Bergqvist, PB; Brennum, LT; Gupta, S; Hogg, S; Larsen, A; Sánchez, C; Wiborg, O, 2003
)
1.76
"Citalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant that has not yet been fully evaluated with respect to its potential for cytochrome P450 3A4-mediated drug interactions in vivo."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of the inhibition of alprazolam by citalopram and fluoxetine.
Hall, J; Herrmann, N; Naranjo, CA; Sproule, BA, 2003
)
1.27
"Citalopram appears to be a safe and effective treatment for compulsive shopping disorder. "( Citalopram for compulsive shopping disorder: an open-label study followed by double-blind discontinuation.
Bullock, KD; Chuong, HW; Koran, LM; Smith, SC, 2003
)
3.2
"Citalopram is a highly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant."( Citalopram in the treatment of binge-eating disorder: a placebo-controlled trial.
Hudson, JI; Keck, PE; Malhotra, S; McElroy, SL; Nelson, EB; Welge, JA, 2003
)
2.48
"Citalopram is a highly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) that has been prescribed to >30 million patients in >70 countries. "( Overview of the safety of citalopram.
Nemeroff, CB, 2003
)
2.06
"Citalopram is a racemic mixture of two stereoisomers, (R)- and (S)-citalopram. "( Regional pattern of binding and c-Fos induction by (R)- and (S)-citalopram in rat brain.
Helboe, L; Thomsen, C, 2003
)
2
"Citalopram is a racemic drug with 50:50 of the S- and R- enantiomers."( Enantioselective analysis of citalopram and its metabolites in postmortem blood and genotyping for CYD2D6 and CYP2C19.
Ahlner, J; Carlsson, B; Dahl, ML; Druid, H; Holmgren, P; Lindblom, B; Scordo, MG; Zackrisson, AL, 2004
)
1.34
"Escitalopram is a highly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). "( [Escitalopram is more effective than citalopram for the treatment of severe major depressive disorder].
Azorin, JM; Despiegel, N; Llorca, PM; Verpillat, P,
)
1.47
"Citalopram is a racemate consisting of a 1:1 mixture of the R(-)- and S(+)-enantiomers. "( Escitalopram versus citalopram: the surprising role of the R-enantiomer.
Braestrup, C; Bøgesø, KP; Ebert, B; Reines, EH; Sánchez, C, 2004
)
2.49
"Escitalopram is a cost-effective alternative compared to (generic) citalopram in the first-line treatment of MDD in Austria."( Cost-effectiveness analysis of escitalopram: a new SSRI in the first-line treatment of major depressive disorder in Austria.
Einarson, TR; Hemels, ME; Kasper, S; Walter, E, 2004
)
1.33
"Citalopram is a promising treatment for functional pediatric recurrent abdominal pain and deserves additional study with a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial."( Citalopram treatment of pediatric recurrent abdominal pain and comorbid internalizing disorders: an exploratory study.
Axelson, D; Birmaher, B; Brent, DA; Bridge, J; Campo, JV; Di Lorenzo, C; Ehmann, M; Kalas, C; Lucas, A; Monk, K; Perel, J; Ryan, N, 2004
)
3.21
"Escitalopram is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for major depressive disorder in both primary and specialist settings. "( Efficacy of escitalopram in patients with severe depression: a pooled analysis.
Azorin, JM; Despiegel, N; Llorca, PM; Verpillat, P, 2005
)
1.41
"Citalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor used in the treatment of depression. "( Activity of citalopram on adenosine and serotonin circulating levels in depressed patients.
Auteri, A; Blardi, P; Bossini, L; Castrogiovanni, P; de Lalla, A; Dell'Erba, A; Urso, R, 2005
)
2.15
"Escitalopram 10 mg/day is an effective and well-tolerated antidepressant. "( Treatment of generalized anxiety disorder with escitalopram: pooled results from double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.
Bose, A; Goodman, WK; Wang, Q, 2005
)
1.3
"Citalopram is an antidepressant drug within the group of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI). "( Case report of a fatal intoxication by citalopram.
Centini, F; Luchini, D; Morabito, G, 2005
)
2.04
"Citalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor indicated for depression. "( Citalopram use in pregnancy: prospective comparative evaluation of pregnancy and fetal outcome.
Einarson, A; Koren, G; Sarkissian, L; Shuhaiber, S; Sivojelezova, A, 2005
)
3.21
"Escitalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI); it is the therapeutically active S-enantiomer of the racemic mixture, citalopram. "( [Escitalopram for treatment of major depressive disorder in adults].
Brousse, G; Llorca, PM; Schwan, R,
)
1.47
"Escitalopram (ESC) is a new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) used in the treatment of depression. "( Outcomes after supratherapeutic escitalopram ingestions.
Knight, J; LoVecchio, F; McDowell, T; Watts, D; Winchell, J, 2006
)
1.33
"Escitalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant indicated for use in adults. "( A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of escitalopram in the treatment of pediatric depression.
Findling, RL; Jonas, J; Saikali, K; Ventura, D; Wagner, KD, 2006
)
1.3
"Escitalopram, which is a recently marketed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), has no such reputation."( Sertraline, escitalopram and tianeptine related abnormal movements but not with bupropion: a case report.
Akarsu, ES; Ayhan, IH; Cankurtaran, ES; Cekic, T; Ozalp, E; Palaoglu, O; Soygur, H; Turhan, L, 2006
)
1.25
"Citalopram is a racemate, consisting of a 1:1 mixture of the S- and R-enantiomers."( [Safety and efficacy of oral escitalopram as continuation treatment of intravenous citalopram, in patients with major depressive disorder--the navigade switch study].
Arbus, C; Schmitt, L; Tonnoir, B,
)
1.14
"Escitalopram is a dual serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) approved for the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders. "( In vivo imaging of serotonin transporter occupancy by means of SPECT and [123I]ADAM in healthy subjects administered different doses of escitalopram or citalopram.
Asenbaum, S; Attarbaschi, T; Dudczak, R; Geiss-Granadia, T; Holik, A; Kasper, S; Klein, N; Lanzenberger, R; Mossaheb, N; Pötzi, C; Sacher, J; Spindelegger, C; Tauscher, J, 2006
)
1.26
"Escitalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) that has shown efficacy in both acute and continuation treatment of major depressive disorder."( Escitalopram maintenance treatment for prevention of recurrent depression: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Bose, A; Gandhi, C; Kornstein, SG; Li, D; Saikali, KG, 2006
)
1.61
"Citalopram is an effective alternative treatment option for patients who do not want to take HT for the alleviation of climacteric symptoms. "( Efficacy of citalopram on climacteric symptoms.
Demir, B; Haberal, A; Kalay, AE; Kalay, M; Kandemir, O,
)
1.95
"As escitalopram is a highly specific SSRI, the results suggest that an increased serotonergic activity disrupts habituation, but not PPI in healthy volunteers."( The effects of increased central serotonergic activity on prepulse inhibition and habituation of the human startle response.
Glenthøj, BY; Jensen, KS; Oranje, B; Wienberg, M, 2007
)
0.79
"Escitalopram is a highly selective inhibitor of serotonin re-uptake that is used to treat anxiety disorders. "( Anxiolytic and panicolytic effects of escitalopram in the elevated T-maze.
Del-Ben, CM; Graeff, FG; Pinheiro, SN; Zangrossi, H, 2008
)
1.33
"Citalopram is a very potent and highly selective inhibitor of neuronal serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, or 5-HT). "( First time, low dose citalopram use-related serotonin syndrome.
Eraydin, I; Gunduz, A; Hos, U; Kalkan, A; Turedi, S, 2007
)
2.1
"Escitalopram (eCIT) is a highly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) that can be an effective treatment for a number of neuropsychiatric disorders including major depression. "( Escitalopram regulates expression of TRH and TRH-like peptides in rat brain and peripheral tissues.
Blood, J; Pekary, AE; Sattin, A, 2008
)
1.79
"Escitalopram is an effective first-line option in the management of patients with major depression, including severe forms, and various anxiety disorders."( Escitalopram for the treatment of major depression and anxiety disorders.
Höschl, C; Svestka, J, 2008
)
1.63
"Citalopram is a new, highly selective inhibitor of 5HT re-uptake."( Treatment of severe obesity with a highly selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor as a supplement to a low calorie diet.
Elsborg, L; Szkudlarek, J, 1993
)
1.01
"Citalopram is an SSRI drug with an attractive pharmacokinetic profile, i.e."( Scandinavian experience with citalopram in the elderly.
Gottfries, CG, 1996
)
1.31
"Citalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor widely used in the treatment of depression (20-40 mg/day)."( Serotonergic modulation of striatal D2 dopamine receptor binding in humans measured with positron emission tomography.
Bergman, J; Eronen, E; Hietala, J; Kuoppamäki, M; Någren, K; Syvälahti, E; Tiihonen, J, 1996
)
1.02
"Citalopram is a serotonin reuptake inhibitor which has been demonstrated to be highly selective and with a superior tolerability profile to the classical tricyclic antidepressants. "( The effect of citalopram in panic disorder.
Koponen, HJ; Lepola, U; Pedersen, T; Pedersen, V; Wade, AG, 1997
)
2.1
"Citalopram, is an extremely potent inhibitor of neuronal serotonin reuptake. "( Citalopram enhances the activity of chloroquine in resistant plasmodium in vitro and in vivo.
Berk, M; Butkow, N; Evans, SG; Havlik, I; Kirchmann, N; Stilwell, C, 1998
)
3.19
"Citalopram (CIT) is an antidepressive drug of the group of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). "( Stereoselective biotransformation of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram and its demethylated metabolites by monoamine oxidases in human liver.
Baumann, P; Boss, G; Gillet, M; Kosel, M; Rochat, B; Testa, B, 1998
)
1.97
"Citalopram is an antidepressant belonging to the class of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) available for the treatment of depression. "( Citalopram in the treatment of depression.
Brown, CS; Parker, NG, 2000
)
3.19
"Citalopram is an SSRI antidepressant with a more specific and selective pharmacological profile than other antidepressants of its class. "( Citalopram--a review of pharmacological and clinical effects.
Aleksic, I; Bezchlibnyk-Butler, K; Kennedy, SH, 2000
)
3.19
"Citalopram is a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor that has demonstrated antidepressant efficacy in numerous controlled clinical trials. "( Citalopram: a comprehensive review.
Pollock, BG, 2001
)
3.2
"Citalopram is a member of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor class of antidepressants. "( QTc interval prolongation associated with citalopram overdose: a case report and literature review.
Catalano, G; Catalano, MC; Epstein, MA; Tsambiras, PE,
)
1.84
"Citalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor that is N-demethylated to N-desmethylcitalopram partially by CYP2C19 and partially by CYP3A4 and N-desmethylcitalopram is further N-demethylated by CYP2D6 to the likewise inactive metabolite di-desmethylcitalopram. "( Review of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction studies with citalopram.
Brøsen, K; Naranjo, CA, 2001
)
1.99
"Citalopram appears to be an effective treatment for pathological gambling, and this benefit was independent of its antidepressant properties. "( An open-label study of citalopram in the treatment of pathological gambling.
Breen, RB; Posternak, MA; Zimmerman, M, 2002
)
2.07
"Citalopram is a relatively new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) that is becoming widely administered for the treatment of depression. "( Citalopram-induced priapism.
Brown, WC; Dent, LA; Murney, JD, 2002
)
3.2
"Citalopram is a chiral antidepressant drug. "( Carbamazepine augmentation in depressive patients non-responding to citalopram: a pharmacokinetic and clinical pilot study.
Baumann, P; Brawand-Amey, M; Eap, CB; Steinacher, L; Vandel, P; Zullino, DF, 2002
)
1.99
"Citalopram is a bicyclic phthalate compound approved in 1998 by the U.S. "( Disposition of citalopram in biological specimens from postmortem cases.
Gubanich, K; Jenkins, AJ, 2002
)
2.11
"Citalopram is an antidepressant belonging to a new class of drugs which enhance serotoninergic neurotransmission through potent and selective inhibition of serotonin reuptake. "( Citalopram. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in depressive illness.
Goa, KL; Milne, RJ, 1991
)
3.17
"Citalopram (CIT), is a selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake blocker and a clinically effective antidepressant. "( Effects of a selective 5-HT reuptake blocker, citalopram, on the sensitivity of 5-HT autoreceptors: electrophysiological studies in the rat brain.
Blier, P; Chaput, Y; de Montigny, C, 1986
)
1.97
"Citalopram is a potent and selective inhibitor of neuronal serotonin uptake. "( Selective labeling of serotonin uptake sites in rat brain by [3H]citalopram contrasted to labeling of multiple sites by [3H]imipramine.
D'Amato, RJ; Largent, BL; Snowman, AM; Snyder, SH, 1987
)
1.95
"Citalopram is a bicyclic phtalane derivative. "( Clinical and biochemical effects of citalopram, a selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor--a dose-response study in depressed patients.
Bjerkenstedt, L; Edman, G; Flyckt, L; Hagenfeldt, L; Sedvall, G; Wiesel, FA, 1985
)
1.99

Effects

Escitalopram has a predictable tolerability profile with generally mild to moderate and transient adverse events, and a low propensity for drug interactions. Citaloprams has an anti-apoptotic effect on PC12 cells.

Citalopram has a favorable adverse effect profile, and thus may be useful in treating depressed patients who cannot tolerate anticholinergic or cardiovascular adverse effects associated with TCAs. Citalopham has been shown to improve agitation in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Escitalopram has a predictable tolerability profile with generally mild to moderate and transient adverse events, and a low propensity for drug interactions."( Escitalopram: a review of its use in the management of major depressive disorder in adults.
Garnock-Jones, KP; McCormack, PL, 2010
)
1.64
"Citalopram has an anti-apoptotic effect on PC12 cells. "( Effects of citalopram on serum deprivation induced PC12 cell apoptosis and BDNF expression.
Cai, W; Duan, J; Li, Y; Tan, Y, 2010
)
2.19
"Escitalopram has a small effect on the QTc interval."( A question about the potential cardiac toxicity of escitalopram.
Howland, RH, 2012
)
1.19
"Escitalopram has a straightforward pharmacokinetic profile, little effect on hepatic metabolism, and is relatively safe in overdose."( Managing depressive and anxiety disorders with escitalopram.
Thase, ME, 2006
)
1.15
"Citalopram has a favorable adverse effect profile, and thus may be useful in treating depressed patients who cannot tolerate anticholinergic or cardiovascular adverse effects associated with TCAs."( Citalopram in the treatment of depression.
Brown, CS; Parker, NG, 2000
)
2.47
"Escitalopram has some unique features among selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. "( Comparing escitaloipram with sertraline for obsessive and compulsive symptoms in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder: A comparative double blind clinical trial.
Dastgheib, SA; Modarresi, F; Mowla, A, 2018
)
1.2
"Escitalopram has been shown to have better efficacy and safety profile than other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor drugs, including racemic citalopram."( Clinical pharmacology review of escitalopram for the treatment of depression.
Gobburu, J; Pastoor, D, 2014
)
1.24
"Escitalopram has widely been recognized as one of the most frequently used antidepressants, with superior tolerability and great efficacy in preventing major depressive disorder (MDD) relapse and recurrence. "( Anhedonia among patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A comparison between patients on escitalopram and healthy controls.
Loh, HS; Ng, CG; Wong, SK; Yee, A,
)
1.07
"But citalopram has fewer side effects especially in the first week."( Efficacy and Safety of Citalopram in Treating Post-Stroke Depression: A Meta-Analysis.
Ding, L; Hong, H; Huang, X; Tan, S, 2015
)
1.21
"Citalopram has been shown to improve agitation in patients with Alzheimer's disease. "( Effects of Citalopram on Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Alzheimer's Dementia: Evidence From the CitAD Study.
Devanand, DP; Drye, LT; Frangakis, C; Leonpacher, AK; Lyketsos, CG; Makino, KM; Mintzer, JE; Munro, CA; Newell, JA; Peters, ME; Pollock, BG; Porsteinsson, AP; Rosenberg, PB; Schneider, LS; Shade, DM; Weintraub, D; Yesavage, J, 2016
)
2.27
"Escitalopram has shown some different pharmacologic properties compared to its racemic molecule, citalopram. "( [Escitalopram versus serotonin reuptake inhibitors].
Millet, B, 2008
)
1.69
"Escitalopram has proven efficacy in the short-term treatment of SAD and prevention of relapse."( Analysis of health-related quality of life and costs based on a randomised clinical trial of escitalopram for relapse prevention in patients with generalised social anxiety disorder.
Aballéa, S; Auquier, P; Despiegel, N; François, C; Montgomery, SA; Roïz, J, 2008
)
1.12
"Citalopram has been regarded as the most toxic of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in overdose; however, hypoglycaemia is not one of the documented features of overdose."( Severe hypoglycaemia in citalopram overdose.
Armstrong, PA; Duncan, RA; Paterson, B, 2008
)
1.37
"Escitalopram has at least comparable efficacy to available serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, venlafaxine XR and duloxetine, and may offer some tolerability advantages over these agents."( Escitalopram--translating molecular properties into clinical benefit: reviewing the evidence in major depression.
Leonard, B; Taylor, D, 2010
)
1.64
"Escitalopram has never been demonstrated to be useful in the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP), while duloxetine has demonstrated analgesic effect in chronic pain states. "( Escitalopram 20 mg versus duloxetine 60 mg for the treatment of chronic low back pain.
Mazza, M; Mazza, O; Mazza, S; Padua, L; Pazzaglia, C, 2010
)
1.8
"Escitalopram has a predictable tolerability profile with generally mild to moderate and transient adverse events, and a low propensity for drug interactions."( Escitalopram: a review of its use in the management of major depressive disorder in adults.
Garnock-Jones, KP; McCormack, PL, 2010
)
1.64
"Citalopram has an anti-apoptotic effect on PC12 cells. "( Effects of citalopram on serum deprivation induced PC12 cell apoptosis and BDNF expression.
Cai, W; Duan, J; Li, Y; Tan, Y, 2010
)
2.19
"Escitalopram has shown efficacy and tolerability in the prevention of relapse in elderly patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). "( Are old-old patients with major depression more likely to relapse than young-old patients during continuation treatment with escitalopram?
Gorwood, P; Katona, C; Lyketsos, CG; Weiller, E, 2011
)
1.3
"Escitalopram has a small effect on the QTc interval."( A question about the potential cardiac toxicity of escitalopram.
Howland, RH, 2012
)
1.19
"Escitalopram has linear pharmacokinetics, so that plasma levels increase proportionately and predictably with increased doses and its half-life of 27 - 32 h is consistent with once-daily dosing."( Escitalopram.
Burke, WJ, 2002
)
1.59
"Citalopram has been associated with seizures, ECG abnormalities, rhabdomyolysis and coma after overdose."( Adult respiratory distress syndrome and renal failure associated with citalopram overdose.
Bateman, DN; Flanagan, RJ; Kelly, CA; Spencer, EP; Upex, A, 2003
)
1.27
"R-citalopram has been shown to counteract the 5-HT enhancing properties of escitalopram in acute studies in animals."( R-citalopram counteracts the antidepressant-like effect of escitalopram in a rat chronic mild stress model.
Gruca, P; Papp, M; Sánchez, C, 2003
)
1.6
"Escitalopram has been shown in clinical trials to improve anxiety symptoms associated with depression, panic disorder, and social anxiety disorder. "( Escitalopram in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: double-blind, placebo controlled, flexible-dose study.
Bose, A; Davidson, JR; Korotzer, A; Zheng, H, 2004
)
1.77
"Escitalopram has demonstrated efficacy for the acute treatment of social anxiety disorder (SAD) in two placebo-controlled trials and for long-term treatment in a relapse-prevention study. "( Escitalopram in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: analysis of efficacy for different clinical subgroups and symptom dimensions.
Andersen, EW; Kasper, S; Lader, M; Nil, R; Stein, DJ, 2004
)
1.77
"Escitalopram has proven efficacy in the short-term treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder (SAD). "( A 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of escitalopram for the prevention of generalized social anxiety disorder.
Boulenger, JP; Dürr-Pal, N; Loft, H; Montgomery, SA; Nil, R, 2005
)
1.29
"Escitalopram has demonstrated a robust and dose-dependent efficacy in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) for up to 3 months. "( Prevention of relapse in generalized anxiety disorder by escitalopram treatment.
Allgulander, C; Florea, I; Huusom, AK, 2006
)
1.3
"Escitalopram has previously been shown to be effective and well tolerated in the acute treatment of GAD."( Safety and efficacy of escitalopram in the long-term treatment of generalized anxiety disorder.
Bose, A; Davidson, JR; Wang, Q, 2005
)
1.19
"Escitalopram has a straightforward pharmacokinetic profile, little effect on hepatic metabolism, and is relatively safe in overdose."( Managing depressive and anxiety disorders with escitalopram.
Thase, ME, 2006
)
1.15
"Escitalopram has been proven safe and efficacious in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in short-term studies. "( Escitalopram in the long-term treatment of major depressive disorder.
Despiegel, N; Heldbo Reines, E; Wade, A,
)
1.57
"Oral citalopram has also been used, but unsatisfactory results were obtained with a dose of 20 mg."( Usefulness of serotoninergic challenge with oral citalopram.
Franco, VA; Gonçalves, JC; Mattos, P; Noel, F; Segenreich, D, 2006
)
1.04
"Escitalopram has low protein binding (56%) and is not likely to cause interactions with highly protein-bound drugs."( The clinical pharmacokinetics of escitalopram.
Rao, N, 2007
)
1.17
"Escitalopram has favourable pharmacokinetics: it is rapidly absorbed, has a bioavailability of 80% and is not affected by food intake."( The use of escitalopram beyond major depression: pharmacological aspects, efficacy and tolerability in anxiety disorders.
Altamura, AC; Bareggi, SR; Dell'Osso, B; Mundo, E, 2007
)
1.27
"2. Citalopram has no antagonistic activity towards DA, NA, 5-HT, histamine, gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA), acetylcholine, and morphine receptors."( Citalopram--pharmacological profile of a specific serotonin uptake inhibitor with antidepressant activity.
Hyttel, J, 1982
)
2.22
"Citalopram has been well tolerated in both short- and long-term use, and the profile seen in trials has been confirmed in the clinic."( The safety and tolerability of citalopram.
Muldoon, C, 1996
)
1.3
"Citalopram has a favorable adverse effect profile, and thus may be useful in treating depressed patients who cannot tolerate anticholinergic or cardiovascular adverse effects associated with TCAs."( Citalopram in the treatment of depression.
Brown, CS; Parker, NG, 2000
)
2.47

Actions

Citalopram overdose may produce bradycardia, QT prolongation, and torsades de pointes (TdP) Escitaloprams did not enhance the efficacy of modafinil to reduce any measure.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Citalopram showed lower concentration changes and faster reuptake profiles compared with escitalopram, so the racemic mixture of citalopram does not change reuptake as much as the S-isomer."( SSRI antidepressants differentially modulate serotonin reuptake and release in Drosophila.
Dunham, KE; Venton, BJ, 2022
)
1.44
"Escitalopram could increase GDNF and BDNF levels and 5-HT content in serum and brain tissue in obsessive-compulsive disorder rats, which contributes to a function on the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder."( Effect of Escitalopram on Serum GDNF and BDNF Levels and 5-HT Level of Brain Tissue of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Rats.
Guo, HR; Huang, BL; Lv, PP; Ma, QG; Ren, YM; Wang, YL; Zhang, YY, 2020
)
1.5
"Escitalopram may cause rare cases of AUR and may often times be overlooked possibly because of the paucity of reporting."( Escitalopram-associated acute urinary retention.
Garrett, K; Harrison, M; Trombetta, D, 2013
)
1.67
"Escitalopram did not enhance the efficacy of modafinil to reduce any measure."( Treatment with modafinil and escitalopram, alone and in combination, on cocaine-induced effects: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled human laboratory study.
De La Garza, R; Haile, CN; Mahoney, JJ; Newton, TF; Thompson-Lake, DG; Verrico, CD, 2014
)
1.25
"Escitalopram showed lower fasting and post-lunch blood sugar values on follow up, which was clinically and statistically significant."( Depression and diabetes: impact of antidepressant medications on glycaemic control.
Agari, AD; Dhavale, HS; Ghulghule, M; Jadhav, BS; Panikkar, V, 2013
)
0.95
"Citalopram overdose may produce bradycardia, QT prolongation, and torsades de pointes (TdP). "( Citalopram overdose: late presentation of torsades de pointes (TdP) with cardiac arrest.
Hoffman, RS; Nelson, L; Tarabar, AF, 2008
)
3.23
"Citalopram overdose can produce life-threatening cardiac toxicity with a clinical onset that may be delayed beyond a routine observation period of 6 hours. "( Citalopram overdose: late presentation of torsades de pointes (TdP) with cardiac arrest.
Hoffman, RS; Nelson, L; Tarabar, AF, 2008
)
3.23
"Escitalopram did not produce greater changes than placebo in panic responses or in ventilatory abnormalities seen during CO2 exposure. "( Effects of escitalopram on anxiety and respiratory responses to carbon dioxide inhalation in subjects at high risk for panic disorder: a placebo-controlled, crossover study.
Coryell, W; Rickels, H, 2009
)
1.44
"Citalopram patients had lower mean pharmacy charges than did sertraline patients (US dollars 255 vs Us dollars 267; 0.036)."( A claims analysis comparing citalopram with sertraline as initial pharmacotherapy for a new episode of depression: impact on depression-related treatment charges.
Eaddy, MT; Grudzinski, AN; McLaughlin, TP, 2004
)
1.34
"Citalopram-induced increase in serotonin levels was strongly enhanced by adjunctive methylphenidate in the hippocampus, but attenuated in the cortex."( Differential effects of adjunctive methylphenidate and citalopram on extracellular levels of serotonin, noradrenaline and dopamine in the rat brain.
Kehr, J; Weikop, P; Yoshitake, T, 2007
)
1.31
"Citalopram prevented the increase in sucrose consumption in the PCA+CVS rats, and in 5-HT-depleted animals blocked the increase in struggling and reduced the number of defecations in the forced swim test."( Rat behavior after chronic variable stress and partial lesioning of 5-HT-ergic neurotransmission: effects of citalopram.
Eller, M; Häidkind, R; Harro, J; Kõiv, K; Mällo, T; Tõnissaar, M, 2008
)
1.28
"Citalopram promotes proliferation and differentiation of NPCs from embryonic rat hippocampus."( [The effects of citalopram on proliferation and differentiation of neural precursor cells from embryonic rat hippocampus].
Chen, BA; Guo, YJ; Teng, GJ; Wang, SH; Zhang, ZJ, 2007
)
2.13
"Citalopram does not cause anticholinergic or cardiovascular adverse effects associated with the TCAs."( Citalopram in the treatment of depression.
Brown, CS; Parker, NG, 2000
)
2.47

Treatment

Escitalopram treatment was well tolerated and associated with robust response rates in a broadly representative population of depressed outpatients. Citaloprams enhanced the right BA47 responses to the No-go condition, but attenuated this response to aversive faces. Citalsopram pretreatment prevented the reduction of affiliation behavior and reduced stereotypies after weaning.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Escitalopram pretreatment had no relevant effect on positive mood effects of psilocybin but significantly reduced bad drug effects, anxiety, adverse cardiovascular effects, and other adverse effects of psilocybin compared with placebo pretreatment."( Acute Effects of Psilocybin After Escitalopram or Placebo Pretreatment in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study in Healthy Subjects.
Becker, AM; Duthaler, U; Eckert, A; Grandinetti, T; Grünblatt, E; Holze, F; Klaiber, A; Kolaczynska, KE; Liechti, ME; Toedtli, VE; Varghese, N, 2022
)
1.55
"Citalopram-treated animals (n = 13) showed a significant increase in impaired forepaw use in the staircase task compared with saline-treated animals (n = 12) 2, 3 and 7 weeks post stroke but no difference in neurological score at any time point examined."( Delayed citalopram administration reduces brain inflammation and enhances skilled motor function after ischaemic stroke in 'MacGreen' mice.
Bennet, L; Chen, S; McGregor, AL, 2022
)
1.88
"Citalopram treatment reduced the Aβ1-42:40 ratio in control but not in fAD PSEN1 cells."( The effect of citalopram treatment on amyloid-β precursor protein processing and oxidative stress in human hNSC-derived neurons.
Aldred, S; Crowe, JA; Dunleavy, C; Elsworthy, RJ; Fisher, E; Hill, EJ; King, MC; Ludlam, A; Parri, HR, 2022
)
1.8
"Citalopram treatment did not seem to modify this association."( Impact of prestroke physical activity and citalopram treatment on poststroke depressive symptoms: a secondary analysis of data from the TALOS randomised controlled trial in Denmark.
Andersen, G; Blauenfeldt, RA; Damsbo, AG; Johnsen, SP; Mortensen, JK; Vestergaard, SB, 2023
)
1.9
"Escitalopram treatment can significantly reverse NAc miRNA abnormality induced by chronic stress. "( Expression alteration of microRNAs in Nucleus Accumbens is associated with chronic stress and antidepressant treatment in rats.
Li, H; Li, X; Lin, GN; Ning, A; Peng, S; Shen, Y; Song, W; Yu, S; Zhang, R; Zhang, Y, 2019
)
1.24
"Escitalopram treatment was associated with changes in the symptom networks in IBS patients with panic disorder. "( Symptom-network dynamics in irritable bowel syndrome with comorbid panic disorder using electronic momentary assessment: A randomized controlled trial of escitalopram vs. placebo.
Drukker, M; Kreiter, D; Kruimel, JW; Leue, C; Masclee, AAM; Mujagic, Z; Rutten, BPF; van Os, J; Vork, L, 2021
)
1.54
"Citalopram-treated APP mice relative to citalopram-untreated APP mice exhibited improved cognitive behavior."( Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram ameliorates cognitive decline and protects against amyloid beta-induced mitochondrial dynamics, biogenesis, autophagy, mitophagy and synaptic toxicities in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.
Bunquin, LE; Kshirsagar, S; Morton, H; Reddy, AP; Reddy, PH; Sawant, N; Yin, X, 2021
)
1.61
"Citalopram treatment (30±5.8 mg/d) resulted in similar 6-month efficacy compared to both quetiapine (94.0±40.4 mg/d) and olanzapine (5.2±1.6 mg/d), lower occurrence of falls than olanzapine [odds ratio (OR) = 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.68-0.97, P = .012], lower incidence of orthostatic hypotension than both quetiapine (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66-0.95, P = .032) and olanzapine (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.69-0.91, P = .02), and less all-cause hospitalizations than both quetiapine (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.88-0.95, P = .016) and olanzapine (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.64-0.92, P = .004), after multiple adjustment for potentially confounding variables. "( Efficacy and Safety of Citalopram Compared to Atypical Antipsychotics on Agitation in Nursing Home Residents With Alzheimer Dementia.
Chiriac, IM; Ettorre, E; Viscogliosi, G, 2017
)
2.21
"Escitalopram-treated MDD patients with higher social desirability achieved more rapid decrease in symptom severity. "( Personality traits and escitalopram treatment outcome in major depression.
Aluoja, A; Eller, T; Maron, E; Raag, M; Tõru, I; Võhma, Ü, 2018
)
1.51
"Citalopram treatment altered levels of select components of the cellular protein homeostatic machinery that may be expected to enhance the capacity to refold and/or degrade mutant ATXN3."( Citalopram Reduces Aggregation of ATXN3 in a YAC Transgenic Mouse Model of Machado-Joseph Disease.
Ashraf, NS; Costa, MDC; Duarte-Silva, S; Maciel, P; Paulson, HL; Shaw, ED; Teixeira-Castro, A, 2019
)
2.68
"Escitalopram treatment (10 mg/d) was administered for 8 consecutive weeks."( Effects of Cytochrome P450 2C19 Genetic Polymorphisms on Responses to Escitalopram and Levels of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Patients With Panic Disorder.
He, Q; Liu, Y; Mei, Y; Shen, L; Yan, H; Yuan, Z; Zhang, J; Zhang, Y,
)
0.92
"Citalopram-treated animals demonstrated no changes in a sucrose test and had elevated body mass."( The differential effects of chronic imipramine or citalopram administration on physiological and behavioral outcomes in naïve mice.
Anokhin, K; Anthony, DC; Dolgov, O; Kubatiev, A; Schroeter, C; Steinbusch, HM; Strekalova, T, 2013
)
1.36
"Citalopram treatment had no significant effect on infarct formation or edema 3 days after stroke; however, citalopram-treated mice had better functional recovery than saline-treated controls 3 and 14 days after stroke in the adhesive removal test."( Citalopram enhances neurovascular regeneration and sensorimotor functional recovery after ischemic stroke in mice.
Espinera, AR; Gu, X; Ogle, ME; Wei, L, 2013
)
2.55
"Citalopram treatment for up to 14 weeks."( SLC6A4 polymorphisms and age of onset in late-life depression on treatment outcomes with citalopram: a Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) report.
Drews, MS; Geske, JR; Mrazek, DA; Shiroma, PR, 2014
)
2.07
"Escitalopram treatment does not provide an additional benefit either for achieving abstinence, or for the treatment of the cannabis withdrawal syndrome. "( Treatment of cannabis dependence using escitalopram in combination with cognitive-behavior therapy: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.
Bar-Hamburger, R; Bloch, M; Bluvstein, I; Miller, H; Rapoport, E; Schreiber, S; Weinstein, AM, 2014
)
1.39
"Citalopram treatment was associated with a larger increase in QTc interval than placebo (difference in week 3 QTc adjusting for baseline QTc: 18.1 ms [95% CI: 6.1, 30.1]; p = 0.004). "( Changes in QTc interval in the citalopram for agitation in Alzheimer's disease (CitAD) randomized trial.
Devanand, DP; Drye, LT; Frangakis, C; Lyketsos, CG; Marano, C; Meinert, CL; Mintzer, JE; Munro, CA; Pelton, G; Pollock, BG; Porsteinsson, AP; Rabins, PV; Rosenberg, PB; Schneider, LS; Shade, DM; Spragg, D; Weintraub, D; Yesavage, J, 2014
)
2.13
"Escitalopram treatment decreased anxiety-related behaviours in stressed animals, by increasing the time spent in the central part of the arena with respect to saline treated stressed animals, without affecting exploratory related behaviours."( Behavioural and transcriptional effects of escitalopram in the chronic escape deficit model of depression.
Alboni, S; Benatti, C; Blom, JM; Brunello, N; Gandolfi, F; Mendlewicz, J; Tascedda, F, 2014
)
1.22
"Citalopram treatment for 5 weeks abolished the increase in anxiety in both sexes, restored the intensity of expression of 5HT1AR in the mPFC in males and increased their expression in the mPFC and DRN in females."( Sex dependent reduction by prenatal stress of the expression of 5HT1A receptors in the prefrontal cortex and CRF type 2 receptors in the raphe nucleus in rats: reversal by citalopram.
Dosoretz-Abittan, L; Shoham, S; Weinstock, M; Zohar, I, 2015
)
1.33
"Citalopram treatment changed these behaviors in lactating mice with further reductions in immobility during the FST and decreased marble burying."( Enhanced responsiveness to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors during lactation.
Benoit, SC; Gregerson, KA; Horseman, ND; Jury, NJ; McCormick, BA, 2015
)
1.14
"Escitalopram treatment was associated with beneficial effects compared to placebo and MTO on one-year outcomes on HAMD, MADRS and SOFAS (p-values<0.01)."( Effects of depression screening on psychiatric outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome: Findings from the K-DEPACS and EsDEPACS studies.
Ahn, Y; Bae, KY; Hong, YJ; Jeong, MH; Kang, HJ; Kim, JM; Kim, SW; Shin, IS; Stewart, R; Yoon, JS, 2015
)
0.98
"Escitalopram-treated rats with >20% recovery in the sucrose consumption during the last 2 wk of treatment were defined as escitalopram responders."( Chronic selective serotonin reuptake inhibition modulates endothelial dysfunction and oxidative state in rat chronic mild stress model of depression.
Aalkjaer, C; Bouzinova, EV; Kravtsova, VV; Matchkov, VV; Wiborg, O, 2015
)
0.98
"Citalopram-treated subjects showed significantly greater improvement in reappraisal ability than CBT-waitlisted subjects. "( Emotional Reactivity and Regulation Following Citalopram Therapy in Children and Adolescents with Anxiety Disorders.
Apter, A; Benaroya-Milshtein, N; Carthy, T; Valevski, A, 2017
)
2.16
"Escitalopram treatment was significantly more efficacious in reducing and treating suicidal ideation than placebo treatment over a 24-week period."( Determinants and escitalopram treatment effects on suicidal ideation in patients with acute coronary syndrome: Findings from the K-DEPACS and EsDEPACS studies.
Ahn, Y; Bae, KY; Hong, YJ; Jeong, MH; Kang, H; Kang, HJ; Kim, JM; Kim, SW; Shin, IS; Yoon, JS, 2016
)
1.32
"Escitalopram treatment significantly decreased PAI-1 levels in the serum, but not in the CSF."( Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 in depression: Results from Animal and Clinical Studies.
Chen, S; Jiang, H; Li, X; Liang, J; Lu, N; Yuan, Y; Yue, Y; Zhang, Z, 2016
)
0.99
"Escitalopram treatment in patients with MNCD-AD or ScVMNCD led to an increase of plasma BDNF concentrations and as a result to a decrease of cognitive, depressive, and anxiety symptom severity."( Plasma Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Biomarker for the Main Types of Mild Neurocognitive Disorders and Treatment Efficacy: A Preliminary Study.
Cherednichenko, NV; Levada, OA; Trailin, AV; Troyan, AS, 2016
)
0.99
"Escitalopram and placebo treatment have differential effects on delta-theta and alpha frequency oscillations."( Escitalopram but not placebo modulates brain rhythmic oscillatory activity in the first week of treatment of Major Depressive Disorder.
Cook, IA; Crump, C; Hunter, AM; Jain, FA; Leuchter, AF; Tartter, M, 2017
)
1.73
"Escitalopram treatments reduced escape latency, elevated platform crossing times, improved CA1 neuronal damage, increased DA and 5-HT levels in hippocampal and cortical neurons, as well as elevated expression of 5-HT1AR mRNA (P < 0.05)."( Effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on expression of 5-HT1AR and neurotransmitters in rats with vascular dementia.
Guo, K; Pan, Q; Yin, G; Zhu, HX; Zi, XH, 2016
)
0.99
"The citalopram treatment produced unexpected results in the FRL rats: 5-HT synthesis was elevated not only in most of the terminal areas, but also in the cell body areas, the DR and MR."( Acute citalopram has different effects on regional 5-HT synthesis in FSL, FRL, and SDP rats: an autoradiographic evaluation.
Diksic, M; Hasegawa, S; Kanemaru, K; Nishi, K, 2008
)
1.31
"Escitalopram-treated patients (N = 459) were less likely to discontinue treatment (HR = 0.85, p = 0.012) or switch to another second-generation antidepressant (HR = 0.76, p = 0.006) compared to patients treated with other SSRI/SNRIs (N = 1517). "( Comparison of treatment persistence, hospital utilization and costs among major depressive disorder geriatric patients treated with escitalopram versus other SSRI/SNRI antidepressants.
Ben-Hamadi, R; Erder, MH; Greenberg, P; Wu, E; Yang, E; Yu, A, 2008
)
1.27
"Escitalopram treatment was effective at decreasing escape latency times in all ages tested. "( Treatment with escitalopram but not desipramine decreases escape latency times in a learned helplessness model using juvenile rats.
Anderson, JC; Bylund, DB; El Refaey, H; Happe, HK; Petty, F; Reed, AL, 2009
)
1.41
"Escitalopram treatment did not affect the maximum pupil size, but it did statistically significantly decrease the relative amplitude of the pupil light reflex compared to the placebo; this effect was equal in both phenotype groups."( Impact of CYP2C19 phenotypes on escitalopram metabolism and an evaluation of pupillometry as a serotonergic biomarker.
Brosen, K; Damkier, P; Larsen, F; Nielsen, F; Noehr-Jensen, L; Sindrup, SH; Zwisler, ST, 2009
)
1.19
"Citalopram treatment of MDD in older patients with heart failure is well-tolerated with low rates of side effects, but was not significantly more effective than placebo in the treatment of depression. "( A double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment trial of citalopram for major depressive disorder in older patients with heart failure: the relevance of the placebo effect and psychological symptoms.
Alves, TC; Andrei, AM; da Silva Telles, RM; Fraguas, R; Iosifescu, DV; Rays, J; Wajngarten, M, 2009
)
2.04
"Escitalopram treatment increased cAMP accumulation, and this seemed due to increased coupling between Galpha(s) and adenylyl cyclase."( Chronic treatment with escitalopram but not R-citalopram translocates Galpha(s) from lipid raft domains and potentiates adenylyl cyclase: a 5-hydroxytryptamine transporter-independent action of this antidepressant compound.
Rasenick, MM; Zhang, L, 2010
)
1.22
"Escitalopram treatment restored some but not all alterations observed in FSL rats after early-life stress."( Early-life stress and antidepressant treatment involve synaptic signaling and Erk kinases in a gene-environment model of depression.
El Khoury, A; Gruber, SH; Mallei, A; Mathé, AA; Musazzi, L; Popoli, M; Racagni, G; Tardito, D, 2010
)
0.92
"Citalopram-treated patients with DRI did significantly worse than placebo-treated patients with DRI. "( Antidepressant medication and executive dysfunction: a deleterious interaction in late-life depression.
Culang, ME; Devanand, DP; Keilp, JG; Roose, SP; Rutherford, BR; Sneed, JR, 2010
)
1.8
"Escitalopram treatment was also associated with higher clinical response (73 vs."( Escitalopram versus serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors as second step treatment for patients with major depressive disorder: a pooled analysis.
Despiégel, N; Lam, RW; Lönn, SL, 2010
)
1.64
"Escitalopram treatment did not effect the reduced levels of NR2B resulting from depression."( Effects of venlafaxine and escitalopram treatments on NMDA receptors in the rat depression model.
Cure, MC; Demirdas, A; Eren, I; Kirbas, A; Sutcu, R; Yilmaz, M; Yilmaz, N, 2011
)
1.22
"Citalopram treatment was effective in treating behavioral symptoms, with significant decreases in NPI total score (F[2, 28] = 6.644, p = 0.004), disinhibition (F[2, 28] = 4.030, p = 0.029), irritability (F[2, 28] = 7.497, p = 0.003) and depression (F[2, 28] = 3.467, p = 0.045) scores over the 6 weeks. "( Serotonergic function and treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of frontotemporal dementia.
Black, SE; Cappell, J; Chow, T; Herrmann, N; Lanctôt, KL; Tang-Wai, DF, 2012
)
1.82
"Escitalopram treatment is generally well tolerated by adolescents, but treatment-emergent agitation, suicidal behavior and manic symptoms should be closely monitored."( Escitalopram for the treatment of major depressive disorder in youth.
Ahn, JH; Patkar, AA, 2011
)
1.65
"The citalopram-treated male mice showed altered sexual behavior, specifically a significant reduction in the number of intromissions preceding ejaculation compared with the vehicle-treated mice."( Early-life citalopram-induced impairments in sexual behavior and the role of androgen receptor.
Parhar, IS; Putteeraj, M; Soga, T; Song, KP; Wong, DW, 2012
)
1.25
"Escitalopram treatment resulted in statistically significant improvements in PEG scores compared to placebo (mean treatment group difference at 8 weeks of -0.33; 95% CI -0.81 to 0.15; p=0.045)."( Effects of escitalopram on menopause-specific quality of life and pain in healthy menopausal women with hot flashes: a randomized controlled trial.
Carpenter, JS; Cohen, L; Ensrud, KE; Freeman, EW; Joffe, H; LaCroix, AZ; Larson, J; Newton, KM; Reed, SD; Seguin, RA; Sternfeld, B, 2012
)
1.31
"Citalopram-treated subjects showed a greater decrease in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores (significant at 2 weeks)."( Acute antidepressive efficacy of lithium monotherapy, not citalopram, depends on recurrent course of depression.
Baethge, C; Bschor, T; Erbe, S; Ising, M; Lewitzka, U; Ritter, D; Uhr, M; Winkelmann, P, 2013
)
1.36
"Citalopram treatment was begun at 20 mg/day and increased every 2 weeks by 20 mg/day, absent marked response and limiting side effects, to 60 mg/day."( Citalopram treatment of compulsive shopping: an open-label study.
Bullock, KD; D'Andrea, V; Elliott, MA; Hartston, HJ; Koran, LM, 2002
)
2.48
"Citalopram treatment may benefit patients with primary social anxiety disorder and comorbid major depression, and it should be further studied in controlled trials."( Citalopram treatment of social anxiety disorder with comorbid major depression.
Blanco, C; Campeas, R; Lewis-Fernandez, R; Liebowitz, MR; Lin, SH; Marshall, R; Sanchez-Lacay, JA; Schmidt, AB; Schneier, FR; Simpson, HB, 2003
)
2.48
"Citalopram treatment did not increase risk of suicide, overdose, seizure, or arrhythmia."( Overview of the safety of citalopram.
Nemeroff, CB, 2003
)
1.34
"Citalopram treated subjects significantly lowered systolic and diastolic blood pressures, while sertraline and placebo treated patients significantly lowered only systolic blood pressure reactivity to individualized trauma scripts."( Can physiologic assessment and side effects tease out differences in PTSD trials? A double-blind comparison of citalopram, sertraline, and placebo.
Burgin, C; Jones, DE; Masters, BK; Parker, DE; Potter-Kimball, R; Tucker, P; Wyatt, DB, 2003
)
1.25
"Escitalopram-treated subjects had significantly lower depression ratings than those of placebo-treated patients."( Escitalopram continuation treatment prevents relapse of depressive episodes.
Bose, A; Rapaport, MH; Zheng, H, 2004
)
1.6
"Citalopram treatment was well tolerated."( A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of citalopram for the treatment of major depression in children and adolescents.
Findling, RL; Gutierrez, MM; Heydorn, WE; Jin, J; Robb, AS; Wagner, KD, 2004
)
1.31
"Citalopram treatment resulted in significant deactivation (p = 0.001) for the entire group in the superior (t = 4.78) and anterior (t = 4.04) cingulate, right thalamus (t = 4.66) and left hippocampus (t = 3.96). "( Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) of anxiety disorders before and after treatment with citalopram.
Carey, PD; Harvey, BH; Niehaus, DJ; Seedat, S; Stein, DJ; van der Linden, G; van Heerden, BB; Warwick, J, 2004
)
1.98
"Escitalopram treatment was well tolerated and associated with robust response rates in a broadly representative population of depressed outpatients."( Escitalopram in clinical practice: results of an open-label trial in a naturalistic setting.
Bose, A; Rush, AJ, 2005
)
1.61
"Citalopram pretreatment enhanced the right BA47 responses to the No-go condition, but attenuated this response to aversive faces."( The effect of citalopram pretreatment on neuronal responses to neuropsychological tasks in normal volunteers: an FMRI study.
Anderson, IM; Deakin, JF; Del-Ben, CM; Delvai, NA; Dolan, M; Elliott, R; McKie, S; Williams, SR, 2005
)
1.41
"Citalopram pretreatment prevented the reduction of affiliation behavior and reduced stereotypies after weaning, and both citalopram and reboxetine abolished the increase in activity seen in control monkeys after weaning, but no statistically significant differences were found between groups."( Psychopharmacology of maternal separation anxiety in vervet monkeys.
Brand, L; Daniels, W; Hugo, C; Marais, L; Stein, DJ; Viljoen, F, 2006
)
1.06
"Citalopram treatment resulted in elevated behavioural activity in the PCS rats during night, indicative of an improved entrainment to the light-dark cycle, whereas no behavioural effect could be observed in sham rats."( Sustained citalopram treatment in experimental hepatic encephalopathy: effects on entrainment to the light-dark cycle and melatonin.
Ahlner, J; Apelqvist, G; Bengtsson, F; Carlsson, B; Kugelberg, FC, 2006
)
1.46
"Escitalopram-treated patients were associated with 14.4% higher first-line treatment success and significantly lower discontinuation rates due to adverse events than were those treated with paroxetine. "( Cost-effectiveness analysis of escitalopram compared with paroxetine in treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in the United Kingdom.
Baldwin, DS; Despiegel, N; Drost, PB; Hemels, ME; Jørgensen, TR; Stein, DJ, 2006
)
1.34
"Escitalopram treatment for 12 weeks led to significant improvement of trichotillomania in some patients in this small open-label trial."( Escitalopram treatment of trichotillomania.
Connor, KM; Foust, MS; Gadde, KM; Ryan Wagner, H, 2007
)
1.62
"Escitalopram treatment (mean final daily dosage: 12.4+/-5.0 mg) led to a significant reduction (baseline versus end of study) of sick leave (11.0+/-12.8 days versus 5.4+/-11.0 days; p<0.001). "( Escitalopram in a working population: results from an observational study of 2378 outpatients in Austria.
Kasper, S; Moser, U; Pjrek, E; Winkler, D, 2007
)
1.78
"Citalopram pretreatment blocked MDMA-related reductions in aggressive and exploratory behavior measured in the social interaction and hole-board tests respectively."( Dissociation of the neurochemical and behavioral toxicology of MDMA ('Ecstasy') by citalopram.
Ali, SF; Fraiman, JB; Meyer, JS; Owens, CB; Piper, BJ, 2008
)
1.29
"Citalopram treated subjects showed a significant reduction in cocaine-positive urines during treatment compared to placebo treated subjects."( Citalopram combined with behavioral therapy reduces cocaine use: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Grabowski, J; Green, CM; Lai, LY; Moeller, FG; Reist, C; Schmitz, JM; Steinberg, JL; Swann, AC, 2007
)
2.5
"In citalopram treated subjects, basal glucose and lactate concentrations were higher compared with controls or with the trimipramine treated group."( Metabolism in adipose tissue in response to citalopram and trimipramine treatment--an in situ microdialysis study.
Adler, G; Alt, A; Ditschuneit, HH; Flechtner-Mors, M; Jenkinson, CP, 2008
)
1.12
"Escitalopram treatment was associated with improvement on all assessed domains that impair quality of life in panic disorder."( Improvement of quality of life in panic disorder with escitalopram, citalopram, or placebo.
Andersen, HF; Baldwin, DS; Bandelow, B; Dolberg, OT; Stein, DJ, 2007
)
1.14
"Only citalopram treatment led to a slight MABP-decreasing effect."( Effects of citalopram and fluoxetine on the corticocerebral blood flow in conscious rabbits.
Csete, K; Papp, JG; Sas, K; Sztriha, L; Vécseil, L; Vezekényi, Z, 2007
)
1.18
"Escitalopram treatment was not significantly different from placebo treatment on the primary efficacy measure, change from baseline to week 12 in MADRS. "( Escitalopram in the acute treatment of depressed patients aged 60 years or older.
Bose, A; Gandhi, C; Li, D, 2008
)
1.79
"Citalopram treatment had no substantial effect on cardiovascular (heart rate and blood pressure) or hormonal (cortisol, prolactin and growth hormone) responses to CCK-4."( Effects of citalopram treatment on behavioural, cardiovascular and neuroendocrine response to cholecystokinin tetrapeptide challenge in patients with panic disorder.
Aluoja, A; Bradwejn, J; Podar, T; Shlik, J; Vasar, E; Vasar, V, 1997
)
1.41
"Citalopram treatment did not alter the self-rated sedation response to pregnanolone compared to vehicle in either study cycle."( Citalopram increases pregnanolone sensitivity in patients with premenstrual syndrome: an open trial.
Bäckström, T; Sundström, I, 1998
)
2.46
"Citalopram treatment partially reversed p-CPA-induced downregulation of [3H]-ketanserin binding in rat whole neocortex."( [3H]-ketanserin binding and elevated plus-maze behavior after chronic antidepressant treatment in DSP-4 and P-CPA pretreated rats: evidence for partial involvement of 5-HT2A receptors.
Allikmets, L; Matto, V; Skrebuhhova, T, 1999
)
1.02
"Citalopram treatment did not alter Bmax and Kd for platelet [3H]paroxetine-binding."( The effect of citalopram treatment on platelet serotonin function in panic disorders.
Aberg-Wistedt, A; Neuger, J; Sinner, B; Stain-Malmgren, R; Wistedt, B, 2000
)
1.39
"The citalopram-treated patients in whom AAM developed were significantly older than those in whom it did not (about 10 years, P < 0.001); gender distribution was similar."( Is selectivity for serotonin uptake associated with a reduced emergence of manic episodes in depressed patients?
Barak, Y; Kimhi, R; Weizman, R, 2000
)
0.79
"Citalopram treatment had no effect on the pharmacokinetic characteristics of theophylline."( Effect of citalopram on plasma levels of oral theophylline.
Larsen, F; Møller, SE; Pitsiu, M; Rolan, PE, 2000
)
1.43
"Citalopram treatment had no effect on serum insulin levels in 15-week-old mice."( Effect of serotonin reuptake inhibitor on syndrome development in obese hyperglycemic mice (Umeå ob/ob).
Lindström, P; Rooth, P; Thrybom, T, 2001
)
1.03
"Citalopram treatment also significantly improved depressive symptomatology compared with placebo; however, escitalopram, 10 mg/day, was at least as effective as citalopram, 40 mg/day, at endpoint."( Fixed-dose trial of the single isomer SSRI escitalopram in depressed outpatients.
Bose, A; Burke, WJ; Gergel, I, 2002
)
1.3
"Treatment with Citalopram appears to have little effect on Aβ generation in fADPSEN1 cells, but our findings suggest that treatment can significantly increase non-amyloidogenic AβPP processing and reduce oxidative stress."( The effect of citalopram treatment on amyloid-β precursor protein processing and oxidative stress in human hNSC-derived neurons.
Aldred, S; Crowe, JA; Dunleavy, C; Elsworthy, RJ; Fisher, E; Hill, EJ; King, MC; Ludlam, A; Parri, HR, 2022
)
1.42
"Rats treated with Escitalopram (10 mg/kg) daily for 7 days followed by apomorphine injections (1mg/kg) for next 7 days."( Depletion of apomorphine induced behavioral sensitization in rats treated with escitalopram.
Farhan, M; Parveen, M, 2019
)
1.05
"Treatment with citalopram but not desipramine after the pretest swim significantly increased pCREB immunoreactivity only in the dBNST."( Desipramine and citalopram attenuate pretest swim-induced increases in prodynorphin immunoreactivity in the dorsal bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and the lateral division of the central nucleus of the amygdala in the forced swimming test.
Cho, JH; Cho, YH; Choi, SH; Chung, S; Kim, DH; Kim, HJ; Shin, KH, 2014
)
1.09
"Treatment with citalopram for agitation in AD needs to be at least 9 weeks in duration to allow sufficient time for full response. "( Time to Response to Citalopram Treatment for Agitation in Alzheimer Disease.
Devanand, DP; Drye, LT; Frangakis, C; Ismail, Z; Lyketsos, CG; Marano, C; Meinert, CL; Mintzer, JE; Munro, CA; Pelton, G; Pollock, BG; Porsteinsson, AP; Rabins, PV; Rosenberg, PB; Schneider, LS; Shade, DM; Weintraub, D; Yesavage, J, 2015
)
1.09
"Treatment with citalopram versus saline was applied via osmotic pump after coronary artery ligation. "( Early citalopram treatment increases mortality due to left ventricular rupture in mice after myocardial infarction.
Ertl, G; Frantz, S; Frey, A; Hofmann, U; Lehmann, M; Lesch, KP; Mathes, D; Pachel, C; Popp, S; Saxon, VM, 2016
)
1.27
"Treatment with citalopram (5 and 10 mg/kg, ip) and desipramine (10 and 20 mg/kg, ip) for 5 days significantly improved locomotor activity, anti-anxiety like behavior in all paradigms tasks (mirror chamber, plus maze, zero maze) as compared to control (72 hr sleep-deprived)."( Possible role of citalopram and desipramine against sleep deprivation-induced anxiety like-behavior alterations and oxidative damage in mice.
Garg, R; Kumar, A, 2008
)
1.03
"Open treatment with citalopram followed by up to 3 sequential next-step treatments."( Association between bipolar spectrum features and treatment outcomes in outpatients with major depressive disorder.
Fava, M; Goldberg, JF; Ostacher, M; Perlis, RH; Rush, AJ; Trivedi, MH; Uher, R, 2011
)
0.69
"Treatment with citalopram abolished the abnormal amygdala responses to sad faces in currently depressed patients but did not alter responses to fearful faces."( Increased amygdala responses to sad but not fearful faces in major depression: relation to mood state and pharmacological treatment.
Anderson, IM; Arnone, D; Deakin, JF; Downey, D; Elliott, R; Juhasz, G; McKie, S; Thomas, EJ; Williams, SR, 2012
)
0.72
"Treatment with citalopram rescued behavior in the forced swim test in hamsters housed in dLAN, but had no effect on hamsters housed in LD."( Chronic citalopram treatment ameliorates depressive behavior associated with light at night.
Bedrosian, TA; Nelson, RJ; Weil, ZM, 2012
)
1.15
"Pretreatment with citalopram, a selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor (2.5 mg kg(-1) i.p.), 40 min prior to CO2 exposure, in Mecp2(-/y) mice resulted in an improvement in CO2 chemosensitivity to wild-type levels."( Increasing brain serotonin corrects CO2 chemosensitivity in methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (Mecp2)-deficient mice.
Abdala, AP; Bissonnette, JM; Knopp, SJ; Paton, JF; Toward, MA, 2013
)
0.71
"Treatment with citalopram resulted in a gradual decline of anxiety symptoms."( Alexithymia in Noonan syndrome.
Egger, JI; Hendrikx, JL; MDoorakkers, MC; Tuinier, S; Van der Burgt, I; Verhoeven, WM, 2004
)
0.66
"Treatment with citalopram resulted in significant deactivation in the left medial temporal cortex irrespective of clinical response. "( Single photon emission computed tomography in posttraumatic stress disorder before and after treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
Hugo, C; Seedat, S; Stein, DJ; van Heerden, B; Van Kradenburg, J; Warwick, J; Zungu-Dirwayi, N, 2004
)
0.68
"Treatment with citalopram led to an increase in BDNF mRNA in only one hippocampal region (CA2) after short-term (2 days) treatment, and when combined with exercise, increased BDNF mRNA in the CA4 and dentate gyrus after 2 weeks."( Hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression following treatment with reboxetine, citalopram, and physical exercise.
Alejandre, H; Chen, MJ; Garcia, C; Ivy, AS; Russo-Neustadt, AA, 2004
)
0.88
"Treatment with citalopram was effective in reversing the behavioral deficits induced by bulbectomy, but did not protect against neurodegeneration."( Antidepressant-mediated reversal of abnormal behavior and neurodegeneration in mice following olfactory bulbectomy.
Jarosik, J; Legutko, B; Unsicker, K; von Bohlen Und Halbach, O, 2007
)
0.68
"Treatment with citalopram was associated with greater increase in tNO over 12 weeks compared to placebo (P = 0.005). "( Platelet and endothelial activity in comorbid major depression and coronary artery disease patients treated with citalopram: the Canadian Cardiac Randomized Evaluation of Antidepressant and Psychotherapy Efficacy Trial (CREATE) biomarker sub-study.
Atar, D; Frasure-Smith, N; Laliberté, MA; Lespérance, F; Malinin, AI; Serebruany, VL; van Zyl, LT, 2009
)
0.92
"Treatment with citalopram for 12 weeks in depressed CAD patients is associated with enhanced production of nitric oxide despite the co-administration of commonly prescribed anti-platelet regimens including aspirin and clopidogrel. "( Platelet and endothelial activity in comorbid major depression and coronary artery disease patients treated with citalopram: the Canadian Cardiac Randomized Evaluation of Antidepressant and Psychotherapy Efficacy Trial (CREATE) biomarker sub-study.
Atar, D; Frasure-Smith, N; Laliberté, MA; Lespérance, F; Malinin, AI; Serebruany, VL; van Zyl, LT, 2009
)
0.92
"The treatment with citalopram or with fluoxetine was confirmed to delay ejaculation, but was significant only for citalopram. "( The effects of citalopram and fluoxetine on sexual behavior in healthy men: evidence of delayed ejaculation and unaffected sexual desire. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study.
Balestrieri, A; Bettica, P; Carani, C; Granata, AR; Madeo, B; Milleri, S; Rochira, V, 2008
)
1.03
"Treatment with citalopram by the intravenous or oral route was most successful in anxious or inhibitory depressions, while atypical forms with hypochondriac or obsedant features responded better to infusions."( [Citalopram (Seropram) in tablet and infusion forms in the treatment of major depression].
Buresová, A; Cesková, E; Kamenická, V; Obrovská, V; Svestka, J; Synek, O, 1993
)
1.54
"Treatment with citalopram at 20 or 30 mg, 40 or 60 mg and clomipramine were significantly superior to placebo, judged by the number of patients free of panic attacks in the week prior to the final assessment. "( The effect of citalopram in panic disorder.
Koponen, HJ; Lepola, U; Pedersen, T; Pedersen, V; Wade, AG, 1997
)
1.01
"Pretreatment with citalopram at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg shifted the DOM dose response relationship to the left."( Potentiation of DOM-induced stimulus control by fluoxetine and citalopram: role of pharmacokinetics.
Doat, MM; Eckler, JR; Rabin, RA; Winter, JC, 2002
)
0.88
"Pretreatment with citalopram (40 mg/kg i.p.) and clomipramine (20 mg/kg i.p.) protected against neuronal destruction of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells following 5 min of forebrain ischemia."( Protective effects of serotonin reuptake inhibitors, citalopram and clomipramine, against hippocampal CA1 neuronal damage following transient ischemia in the gerbil.
Kato, H; Kogure, K; Nakata, N, 1992
)
0.86

Toxicity

Citalopram resulted in similar efficacy and less adverse outcomes when compared to 2 atypical antipsychotics for treatment of agitation in NH residents with AD. The results suggest that compounds that indirectly facilitate 5-HT1 A receptor activation may be more effective therapeutics.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Orthostatic hypotension, the clinically most important side effect in treatment with tricyclic antidepressants, was investigated in a double-blind study with clomipramine and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram given for 5 weeks."( Orthostatic side effects of clomipramine and citalopram during treatment for depression.
Christensen, P; Gram, LF; Kragh-Sørensen, P; Pedersen, OL; Thomsen, HY, 1985
)
0.71
" Spontaneous adverse event reports arising from clinical use have confirmed the safety profile defined during the trials programme."( The safety and tolerability of citalopram.
Muldoon, C, 1996
)
0.58
" It is thus suggested that otherwise generally safe central nervous system 5-HT-active drugs may represent a potential hazard in patients with liver failure with or without PSE."( Effect of citalopram on brain serotonin release in experimental hepatic encephalopathy: implications for thymoleptic drug safety in liver insufficiency.
Apelqvist, G; Bengtsson, F; Bergqvist, PB; Hjorth, S; Wikell, C, 1997
)
0.7
"English-language articles identified through MEDLINE (1985 through 1997), and case reports from the American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC) (1987 through 1996) and United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse event database (through 1997) that describe findings of fatal and nonfatal overdoses involving SSRIs alone or in combination with other ingestants were reviewed."( SSRI safety in overdose.
Barbey, JT; Roose, SP, 1998
)
0.3
" At very high doses (> 75 times the common daily dose), more serious adverse events, including seizures, electrocardiogram (ECG) changes, and decreased consciousness may occur."( SSRI safety in overdose.
Barbey, JT; Roose, SP, 1998
)
0.3
" Both treatments were well tolerated with a relatively low incidence of adverse events."( A randomised, double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of citalopram compared to mianserin in elderly, depressed patients with or without mild to moderate dementia.
Augusto De Mendonça Lima, C; Eglin, M; Godderis, J; Karlsson, I; Nygaard, H; Simányi, M; Taal, M, 2000
)
0.54
"The article focuses on adverse drug reactions (ADR) to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) concerning libido and sexual behaviour: cases of disinhibition of libido observed at the Psychiatric Hospital of Kilchberg near Zurich are described."( Disinhibition of libido: an adverse effect of SSRI?
Erazo, N; Greil, W; Grohmann, R; Horvath, A; Sassim, N, 2001
)
0.31
"Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are widely used in the treatment of depressive and obsessive-compulsive disorders because of their low-frequency adverse effects."( [Cutaneous adverse effects during selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors therapy: 2 cases].
Fiszenson, F; Grob, JJ; Jean Pastor, MJ; Jreissati, M; Richard, MA,
)
0.13
"Adverse cutaneous effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are rare but the knowledge of these reactions is important because toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome had been reported during fluoxetine (Prozac(R)) and fluvoxamine (Floxyfral(R)) treatment."( [Cutaneous adverse effects during selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors therapy: 2 cases].
Fiszenson, F; Grob, JJ; Jean Pastor, MJ; Jreissati, M; Richard, MA,
)
0.13
" The age-related differences in the side effect profile may be attributable to altered sensitivity of the serotonergic system."( Age-related differences in the side effect profile of citalopram.
Barak, Y; Levy, D; Swartz, M; Weizman, R, 2003
)
0.57
" The available data suggest that citalopram 20-60 mg once daily is safe for patients with depression."( Overview of the safety of citalopram.
Nemeroff, CB, 2003
)
0.9
" However, subtle differences in improvements in PTSD symptom clusters, physiologic reactivity, and reported adverse events were identified."( Can physiologic assessment and side effects tease out differences in PTSD trials? A double-blind comparison of citalopram, sertraline, and placebo.
Burgin, C; Jones, DE; Masters, BK; Parker, DE; Potter-Kimball, R; Tucker, P; Wyatt, DB, 2003
)
0.53
"The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of infantile adverse events from exposure through breast-feeding to maternal citalopram therapy."( Frequency of infant adverse events that are associated with citalopram use during breast-feeding.
Ito, S; Lee, A; Woo, J, 2004
)
0.77
" Data collection included infant feeding method, medication use, and adverse events."( Frequency of infant adverse events that are associated with citalopram use during breast-feeding.
Ito, S; Lee, A; Woo, J, 2004
)
0.57
"There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of adverse events in the three groups (3/31 events, 0/12 events, and 1/31 events in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively)."( Frequency of infant adverse events that are associated with citalopram use during breast-feeding.
Ito, S; Lee, A; Woo, J, 2004
)
0.57
" The reported incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was somewhat lower with escitalopram than with duloxetine, with the possible exception of sexual dysfunction."( Newer antidepressants: review of efficacy and safety of escitalopram and duloxetine.
Hirschfeld, RM; Vornik, LA, 2004
)
0.79
"Mirtazapine and nefazadone appear safe in overdose and were associated with minimal features of neurological or cardiovascular toxicity."( Comparative toxicity of citalopram and the newer antidepressants after overdose.
Bateman, DN; Dhaun, N; Good, AM; Kelly, CA; Laing, WJ; Strachan, FE, 2004
)
0.63
" The efficacy of two treatments was assessed every 2 weeks during treatment, at the end of study and in 3- and 6-month follow-up after cessation of treatment, using responses to IIEF, IVELT evaluation, mean intercourse satisfaction domain, mean weekly coitus episodes and adverse drug effects."( Safety and efficacy of citalopram in the treatment of premature ejaculation: a double-blind placebo-controlled, fixed dose, randomized study.
Hosseini, SY; Safarinejad, MR,
)
0.44
" Their use is frequently associated with dose-limiting adverse effects."( Simple pharmacological test battery to assess efficacy and side effect profile of centrally acting muscle relaxant drugs.
Berzsenyi, P; Farkas, S; Kárpáti, E; Kocsis, P; Tarnawa, I,
)
0.13
" For detecting side effect liability (ataxia, sedation, impairment of voluntary motor functions), (1) the rota-rod test, (2) measurement of spontaneous motility, (3) the weight-lifting test and (4) the thiopental sleep test were used."( Simple pharmacological test battery to assess efficacy and side effect profile of centrally acting muscle relaxant drugs.
Berzsenyi, P; Farkas, S; Kárpáti, E; Kocsis, P; Tarnawa, I,
)
0.13
"Therapeutic indices calculated from the results of these in vivo experiments for the clinically used muscle relaxants are in agreement with their adverse effect profiles in humans."( Simple pharmacological test battery to assess efficacy and side effect profile of centrally acting muscle relaxant drugs.
Berzsenyi, P; Farkas, S; Kárpáti, E; Kocsis, P; Tarnawa, I,
)
0.13
" The safety and tolerability of hypericum extract in comparison to citalopram and placebo was investigated on the basis of CGI, the occurrence of adverse events and the investigation of laboratory parameters and vital signs."( Comparative efficacy and safety of a once-daily dosage of hypericum extract STW3-VI and citalopram in patients with moderate depression: a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled study.
Gastpar, M; Singer, A; Zeller, K, 2006
)
0.79
" Significantly more adverse events with "certain", "probable" or "possible" relation to study medication were documented in the citalopram group (hypericum: 17."( Comparative efficacy and safety of a once-daily dosage of hypericum extract STW3-VI and citalopram in patients with moderate depression: a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled study.
Gastpar, M; Singer, A; Zeller, K, 2006
)
0.76
" In all, 57 patients (33%) reported at least 1 adverse event, and 7 patients (4%) were withdrawn due to an adverse event."( Safety and efficacy of oral escitalopram as continuation treatment of intravenous citalopram in patients with major depressive disorder.
Arbus, C; Schmitt, L; Tonnoir, B, 2006
)
0.62
" Adverse events occurring in 10% of patients or more with adjunctive placebo or aripiprazole were akathisia (4."( The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: a second multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Berman, RM; Carson, WH; Fava, M; Hennicken, D; Marcus, RN; McQuade, RD; Simon, JS; Thase, ME; Trivedi, MH, 2008
)
0.35
" In 9% of patients, RLS was recorded as a side effect related to the administration of AD."( Restless legs syndrome as side effect of second generation antidepressants.
Gallwitz, T; Kirch, MH; Messer, T; Rottach, KG; Schaner, BM; Teufel, LM; Zivotofsky, AZ, 2008
)
0.35
" Therefore, the issue of how safe the combination of these 2 treatment modalities is warrants investigation."( The safety of the electroconvulsive therapy-escitalopram combination.
Florakis, A; Markatou, M; Masdrakis, VG; Oulis, P; Papadimitriou, GN; Valamoutopoulos, T, 2008
)
0.6
"The goal of this article was to describe a potential drug-drug interaction between propafenone and citalopram, which caused symptoms of propafenone adverse effects."( Adverse effects of propafenone after long-term therapy with the addition of citalopram.
Garcia, A, 2008
)
0.79
"An 80-year-old white female, followed up at the Memory Clinic for mild cognitive impairment, had been taking propafenone 900 mg/d for >10 years for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation without adverse effects."( Adverse effects of propafenone after long-term therapy with the addition of citalopram.
Garcia, A, 2008
)
0.58
"This is the first report of a possible interaction between propafenone and citalopram, which caused propafenone adverse effects (eg, dizziness, falls) and mimicked coronary artery disease."( Adverse effects of propafenone after long-term therapy with the addition of citalopram.
Garcia, A, 2008
)
0.81
"Escitalopram seems to be less toxic than citalopram after an acute overdose; seizures and tremors were more common with citalopram."( Comparison of toxicity of acute overdoses with citalopram and escitalopram.
Clark, RF; Hayes, BD; Klein-Schwartz, W; Miloradovich, JE; Muller, AA, 2010
)
1.34
"The authors sought to identify predictors of self-harm adverse events in treatment-resistant, depressed adolescents during the first 12 weeks of treatment."( Predictors of spontaneous and systematically assessed suicidal adverse events in the treatment of SSRI-resistant depression in adolescents (TORDIA) study.
Asarnow, J; Birmaher, B; Brent, DA; Clarke, GN; Debar, LL; Emslie, GJ; Iyengar, S; Keller, MB; Kennard, B; Leonard, H; Mayes, TL; McCracken, JT; Onorato, M; Porta, G; Ritz, L; Ryan, ND; Spirito, A; Strober, M; Suddath, R; Vitiello, B; Zelazny, J, 2009
)
0.35
", suicidal and non-suicidal self-injury adverse events were assessed by spontaneous report for the first 181 participants, and by systematic weekly assessment for the last 153 participants."( Predictors of spontaneous and systematically assessed suicidal adverse events in the treatment of SSRI-resistant depression in adolescents (TORDIA) study.
Asarnow, J; Birmaher, B; Brent, DA; Clarke, GN; Debar, LL; Emslie, GJ; Iyengar, S; Keller, MB; Kennard, B; Leonard, H; Mayes, TL; McCracken, JT; Onorato, M; Porta, G; Ritz, L; Ryan, ND; Spirito, A; Strober, M; Suddath, R; Vitiello, B; Zelazny, J, 2009
)
0.35
"2%), but not serious adverse events (8."( Predictors of spontaneous and systematically assessed suicidal adverse events in the treatment of SSRI-resistant depression in adolescents (TORDIA) study.
Asarnow, J; Birmaher, B; Brent, DA; Clarke, GN; Debar, LL; Emslie, GJ; Iyengar, S; Keller, MB; Kennard, B; Leonard, H; Mayes, TL; McCracken, JT; Onorato, M; Porta, G; Ritz, L; Ryan, ND; Spirito, A; Strober, M; Suddath, R; Vitiello, B; Zelazny, J, 2009
)
0.35
"Since predictors of suicidal adverse events also predict poor response to treatment, and many of these events occurred early in treatment, improving the speed of response to depression, by targeting of family conflict, suicidal ideation, and drug use may help to reduce their incidence."( Predictors of spontaneous and systematically assessed suicidal adverse events in the treatment of SSRI-resistant depression in adolescents (TORDIA) study.
Asarnow, J; Birmaher, B; Brent, DA; Clarke, GN; Debar, LL; Emslie, GJ; Iyengar, S; Keller, MB; Kennard, B; Leonard, H; Mayes, TL; McCracken, JT; Onorato, M; Porta, G; Ritz, L; Ryan, ND; Spirito, A; Strober, M; Suddath, R; Vitiello, B; Zelazny, J, 2009
)
0.35
" Its use has been widely considered both safe and cost effective."( Parathyroid surgery and methylene blue: a review with guidelines for safe intraoperative use.
Delfiner, J; Fernandez, J; Pollack, A; Pollack, G, 2009
)
0.35
" It has been shown in many studies to be an effective and safe antidepressant for treating major depressive disorder (MDD)."( Efficacy and safety of escitalopram versus citalopram in major depressive disorder: a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose study.
Du, B; Fang, MS; Li, LH; Ou, JJ; Shi, JG; Wu, RR; Xie, SP; Xun, GL; Yuan, XQ; Zhang, HG; Zhao, JP, 2011
)
0.67
" The adverse events (AEs) were recorded by the investigator."( Efficacy and safety of escitalopram versus citalopram in major depressive disorder: a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose study.
Du, B; Fang, MS; Li, LH; Ou, JJ; Shi, JG; Wu, RR; Xie, SP; Xun, GL; Yuan, XQ; Zhang, HG; Zhao, JP, 2011
)
0.67
"The study suggests that escitalopram 10-20 mg/d are as effective and safe as citalopram 20-40 mg/d in the short-term treatment for Chinese MDD patients."( Efficacy and safety of escitalopram versus citalopram in major depressive disorder: a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose study.
Du, B; Fang, MS; Li, LH; Ou, JJ; Shi, JG; Wu, RR; Xie, SP; Xun, GL; Yuan, XQ; Zhang, HG; Zhao, JP, 2011
)
0.97
" An understanding of structure-activity relationships (SARs) of chemicals can make a significant contribution to the identification of potential toxic effects early in the drug development process and aid in avoiding such problems."( Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
Fisk, L; Greene, N; Naven, RT; Note, RR; Patel, ML; Pelletier, DJ, 2010
)
0.36
" Twelve (20%) patients had adverse events leading to discontinuation."( Efficacy, safety and tolerability of escitalopram in doses up to 50 mg in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD): an open-label, pilot study.
Crawford, GM; Wade, AG; Yellowlees, A, 2011
)
0.64
"An antidepressant's tolerability, generally captured as the frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs), is often as important as its efficacy in determining treatment success."( Remission of major depressive disorder without adverse events: a comparison of escitalopram versus serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.
Ben-Hamadi, R; Dworak, H; Erder, MH; Ramakrishnan, K; Signorovitch, J; Wu, EQ; Yu, AP, 2011
)
0.6
"The serotonin toxicity (ST) is a potentially life-threatening adverse drug reaction results from therapeutic drug use, intentional self-poisoning, or inadvertent interactions between drugs."( Serotonin toxicity: a short review of the literature and two case reports involving citalopram.
Bruno, G; Canevelli, M; Lenzi, GL; Piacentini, E; Pietracupa, S; Talarico, G; Tosto, G, 2011
)
0.59
"There is a potential risk that 5-HT(1A) receptor blockade combined with blockade of the 5-HT transporter by an SSRI may cause a toxic increase in 5-HT within the synapse, sparking concern for 'serotonin syndrome', a rare but potentially life threatening condition."( Concomitant blockade of 5-HT(1A) receptor and 5-HT transporter: use of the Hunter Serotonin toxicity criteria in a clinical pharmacology study.
Chalon, S; Connell, J; Parks, V; Philipp, AW; Plotka, A; Raje, S; Schechter, LE, 2012
)
0.38
"The objective was to assess differences in adverse events between major depressive patients augmented with a second medication and patients switched to an alternative monotherapy after failing first-step treatment with citalopram."( Risk of adverse events in treatment-resistant depression: propensity-score-matched comparison of antidepressant augment and switch strategies.
Dusetzina, SB; Ellis, AR; Farley, JF; Gaynes, BN; Hansen, RA; Stürmer, T,
)
0.32
"Incidence proportions of any adverse event and specific adverse events were similar between the augment and switch groups."( Risk of adverse events in treatment-resistant depression: propensity-score-matched comparison of antidepressant augment and switch strategies.
Dusetzina, SB; Ellis, AR; Farley, JF; Gaynes, BN; Hansen, RA; Stürmer, T,
)
0.13
"After adjusting for selection bias inherent in the STAR*D comparison of augment with switch, clinically meaningful differences in the adverse event profiles between these treatment strategies were not observed."( Risk of adverse events in treatment-resistant depression: propensity-score-matched comparison of antidepressant augment and switch strategies.
Dusetzina, SB; Ellis, AR; Farley, JF; Gaynes, BN; Hansen, RA; Stürmer, T,
)
0.13
"To determine whether distressing adverse events (DAEs) experienced during initial antidepressant treatment are associated with subsequent DAEs after switching to a second antidepressant."( Distressing adverse events after antidepressant switch in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial: influence of adverse events during initial treatment with citalopram on development of subsequent adverse events with an a
Castillo, WC; Dusetzina, SB; Ellis, AR; Farley, JF; Gaynes, BN; Hansen, RA; Katz, AJ; Stürmer, T, 2012
)
0.57
" Regression models were used to compare the risk of adverse events during second-step treatment between those who reported similar adverse events during first-step treatment and those who did not, while controlling for potential confounders."( Distressing adverse events after antidepressant switch in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial: influence of adverse events during initial treatment with citalopram on development of subsequent adverse events with an a
Castillo, WC; Dusetzina, SB; Ellis, AR; Farley, JF; Gaynes, BN; Hansen, RA; Katz, AJ; Stürmer, T, 2012
)
0.57
"Patients who experienced DAEs with initial antidepressant treatment were likely to report similar adverse events after switching to an alternative antidepressant, even when subsequent treatment is from a different class of antidepressants."( Distressing adverse events after antidepressant switch in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial: influence of adverse events during initial treatment with citalopram on development of subsequent adverse events with an a
Castillo, WC; Dusetzina, SB; Ellis, AR; Farley, JF; Gaynes, BN; Hansen, RA; Katz, AJ; Stürmer, T, 2012
)
0.57
"The physicochemical properties of racemates and stereoisomers of medicines can differ significantly, and this may affect the side-effect profile in addition to the pharmacokinetics and intended pharmacology."( Safety profile of enantiomers vs. racemic mixtures: it's the same?
Bagheri, H; Caillet, C; Chauvelot-Moachon, L; Montastruc, JL, 2012
)
0.38
"This is a study to investigate the profile of adverse drug reactions of racemic and enantiomeric forms of drugs."( Safety profile of enantiomers vs. racemic mixtures: it's the same?
Bagheri, H; Caillet, C; Chauvelot-Moachon, L; Montastruc, JL, 2012
)
0.38
" A case-noncase approach was used to measure the disproportionality of combination between adverse drug reaction (ADR) and exposure to drug."( Safety profile of enantiomers vs. racemic mixtures: it's the same?
Bagheri, H; Caillet, C; Chauvelot-Moachon, L; Montastruc, JL, 2012
)
0.38
" While a range of effective antidepressants are now available, failure and relapse rates remain substantial, with intolerable side effect burden the most commonly cited reason for discontinuation."( Genome-wide pharmacogenomic study of citalopram-induced side effects in STAR*D.
Åberg, K; Adkins, DE; Bukszár, J; Clark, SL; Hettema, JM; McClay, JL; Souza, RP; van den Oord, EJ, 2012
)
0.65
" After 12 months, 16 and 13 major adverse events (death, recurrent ACS, or acute revascularization) were recorded in the escitalopram and placebo group, respectively (NS)."( Cardiovascular safety of one-year escitalopram therapy in clinically nondepressed patients with acute coronary syndrome: results from the DEpression in patients with Coronary ARtery Disease (DECARD) trial.
Birket-Smith, M; Hanash, JA; Hansen, BH; Hansen, JF; Nielsen, OW; Rasmussen, A, 2012
)
0.86
"One-year escitalopram treatment was safe and well tolerated in patients with recent ACS."( Cardiovascular safety of one-year escitalopram therapy in clinically nondepressed patients with acute coronary syndrome: results from the DEpression in patients with Coronary ARtery Disease (DECARD) trial.
Birket-Smith, M; Hanash, JA; Hansen, BH; Hansen, JF; Nielsen, OW; Rasmussen, A, 2012
)
1.04
"Published data concerning the cardiac effects of citalopram were ascertained, and clinical data were considered separately between adverse effects arising from therapeutic use versus toxicity in the setting of intentional overdose."( Citalopram and cardiac toxicity.
Cooke, MJ; Waring, WS, 2013
)
2.09
"Although some cases of MMs have been reported after maternal exposure to ESC during early pregnancy, the rate of these adverse events is substantially in the range of those reported in unexposed women."( The safety of escitalopram during pregnancy and breastfeeding: a comprehensive review.
Bellantuono, C; Bozzi, F; Catena-Dell'Osso, M; Orsolini, L, 2012
)
0.72
"The available data seem to support the notion that ESC might be considered safe during pregnancy, in particular as far as MMs is concerned."( The safety of escitalopram during pregnancy and breastfeeding: a comprehensive review.
Bellantuono, C; Bozzi, F; Catena-Dell'Osso, M; Orsolini, L, 2012
)
0.72
"To evaluate the risk factors of psychiatric adverse events associated with PEG interferon and ribavirin treatment for chronic hepatitis C and assess the efficacy of escitalopram intervention for these adverse effects."( [Escitalopram for intervention of psychiatric adverse events during peginterferon-alfa-2a and ribavirin treatment for chronic hepatitis C].
Pan, J; Qi, M; Su, M; Zhang, H; Zhou, B, 2013
)
1.21
" Assessment of cardiovascular safety included heart rate, blood pressure (BP), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and electrocardiograms (ECGs)."( The cardiovascular safety profile of escitalopram.
Kennedy, SH; Larsen, KG; Reines, E; Thase, ME, 2013
)
0.66
" Side effects were assessed using the Udvalg fur Kliniske Undersøgelser side-effect rating scale."( Common selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor side effects in older adults associated with genetic polymorphisms in the serotonin transporter and receptors: data from a randomized controlled trial.
Dixon, D; Doré, PM; Garfield, LD; Kristjansson, SD; Lenze, EJ; Lotrich, FE; Nowotny, P; Pollock, BG, 2014
)
0.4
"Four significant drug-placebo side-effect differences were found: increased duration of sleep, dry mouth, diarrhea, and diminished sexual desire."( Common selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor side effects in older adults associated with genetic polymorphisms in the serotonin transporter and receptors: data from a randomized controlled trial.
Dixon, D; Doré, PM; Garfield, LD; Kristjansson, SD; Lenze, EJ; Lotrich, FE; Nowotny, P; Pollock, BG, 2014
)
0.4
"2% (53/88) receiving lisdexamfetamine dimesylate had ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event, the most frequent with lisdexamfetamine dimesylate being dry mouth and headache (both 11."( A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate as augmentation therapy in adults with residual symptoms of major depressive disorder after treatment with escitalopram.
Cutler, AJ; Gao, J; Geibel, BB; Lasser, R; Patkar, AA; Richards, C; Sambunaris, A; Trivedi, MH, 2013
)
0.58
" On the contrary, no short-term adverse effects in newborns were reported in the 5 studies evaluating the safety of ESC during breastfeeding."( [The safety profile of escitalopram in pregnancy and breastfeeding].
Bellantuono, C; Bozzi, F; Orsolini, L,
)
0.43
"Data coming from published studies and from our cases seem to support the notion that ESC might be considered safe during pregnancy and breastfeeding, particularly as far as MM is concerned."( [The safety profile of escitalopram in pregnancy and breastfeeding].
Bellantuono, C; Bozzi, F; Orsolini, L,
)
0.43
" Adverse effects are common, occur early on in treatment and are reported to be one of the main reasons for discontinuation of antidepressant treatment."( Adverse effects from antidepressant treatment: randomised controlled trial of 601 depressed individuals.
Cowen, P; Crawford, AA; Lewis, G; Lewis, S; Nutt, D; O'Donovan, MC; Peters, TJ; Wiles, N, 2014
)
0.4
"To investigate the association between adverse effects occurring in the first 2 weeks of antidepressant treatment and discontinuation by 6 weeks as the outcome."( Adverse effects from antidepressant treatment: randomised controlled trial of 601 depressed individuals.
Cowen, P; Crawford, AA; Lewis, G; Lewis, S; Nutt, D; O'Donovan, MC; Peters, TJ; Wiles, N, 2014
)
0.4
"Individuals randomised to reboxetine reported a greater number of adverse effects and were more likely to stop treatment than individuals receiving citalopram."( Adverse effects from antidepressant treatment: randomised controlled trial of 601 depressed individuals.
Cowen, P; Crawford, AA; Lewis, G; Lewis, S; Nutt, D; O'Donovan, MC; Peters, TJ; Wiles, N, 2014
)
0.6
"The majority of adverse effects were not individually associated with discontinuation from antidepressant treatment."( Adverse effects from antidepressant treatment: randomised controlled trial of 601 depressed individuals.
Cowen, P; Crawford, AA; Lewis, G; Lewis, S; Nutt, D; O'Donovan, MC; Peters, TJ; Wiles, N, 2014
)
0.4
" Safety and tolerability was evaluated by changes in routine laboratory parameters, vital signs, and adverse events reported by the subject and/or observed by the clinician."( Clinical effectiveness and safety of escitalopram and desvenlafaxine in patients of depression with anxiety: a randomized, open-label controlled trial.
Chakraborty, S; Chatterjee, S; Ghosal, MK; Gupta, A; Maity, N; Sil, A,
)
0.4
"The results suggest that compounds that indirectly facilitate 5-HT1 A receptor activation, such as citalopram, may be more effective therapeutics than direct 5-HT1 A receptor agonists because they exhibit similar anti-dyskinesia efficacy, while possessing a reduced side effect profile."( Side effect profile of 5-HT treatments for Parkinson's disease and L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in rats.
Bishop, C; Conti, MM; Lindenbach, D; Ostock, CY; Palumbo, N; Vilceus, N, 2015
)
0.63
" The most common adverse events (≥5% of vilazodone patients, twice the rate of placebo) were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting (vilazodone 40 mg/day only), and insomnia."( Efficacy and safety of vilazodone 20 and 40 mg in major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Chen, D; Gommoll, C; Khan, A; Mathews, M; Nunez, R, 2015
)
0.42
"P450 genotype did not predict total side effect burden (nortriptyline: n = 251, p = 0."( Exploring the role of drug-metabolising enzymes in antidepressant side effects.
Aitchison, KJ; Craig, IW; Dernovšek, MZ; Dobson, RJ; Farmer, AE; Hauser, J; Henigsberg, N; Hodgson, K; Maier, W; McGuffin, P; Mors, O; Placentino, A; Rietschel, M; Souery, D; Tansey, KE; Uher, R, 2015
)
0.42
"It has been suggested that the efficacy of antidepressants has been overestimated in clinical trials owing to unblinding of drug treatments by adverse events."( Efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and adverse events: meta-regression and mediation analysis of placebo-controlled trials.
Barbui, C; Barth, M; Cipriani, A; Klostermann, S; Kriston, L; Linde, K, 2016
)
0.43
"To investigate the association between adverse events and the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)."( Efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and adverse events: meta-regression and mediation analysis of placebo-controlled trials.
Barbui, C; Barth, M; Cipriani, A; Klostermann, S; Kriston, L; Linde, K, 2016
)
0.43
" Reporting of adverse events was used as an indicator of tolerability."( Efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and adverse events: meta-regression and mediation analysis of placebo-controlled trials.
Barbui, C; Barth, M; Cipriani, A; Klostermann, S; Kriston, L; Linde, K, 2016
)
0.43
"Our results do not support, but also do not unequivocally disprove, the hypothesis that adverse events lead to an overestimation of the effect of SSRIs over placebo."( Efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and adverse events: meta-regression and mediation analysis of placebo-controlled trials.
Barbui, C; Barth, M; Cipriani, A; Klostermann, S; Kriston, L; Linde, K, 2016
)
0.43
"Even though citalopram is commonly used in psychiatry, there are several reports on its toxic effects."( In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the mechanisms of citalopram-induced hepatotoxicity.
Ahmadian, E; Babaei, H; Eftekhari, A; Eghbal, MA; Fard, JK; Mohammadnejad, D; Nayebi, AM, 2017
)
1.08
" We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of depression ratings, response, remission, and adverse effects calculating standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) ±95% confidence intervals (CIs)."( Lamotrigine compared to placebo and other agents with antidepressant activity in patients with unipolar and bipolar depression: a comprehensive meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes in short-term trials.
Anghelescu, IG; Correll, CU; Gao, K; Normann, C; Reis, C; Schaffer, A; Solmi, M; van der Loos, ML; Veronese, N; Zaninotto, L, 2016
)
0.43
" Adverse effects and all-cause/specific-cause discontinuation were similar across all comparisons."( Lamotrigine compared to placebo and other agents with antidepressant activity in patients with unipolar and bipolar depression: a comprehensive meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes in short-term trials.
Anghelescu, IG; Correll, CU; Gao, K; Normann, C; Reis, C; Schaffer, A; Solmi, M; van der Loos, ML; Veronese, N; Zaninotto, L, 2016
)
0.43
"Lamotrigine was superior to placebo in improving unipolar and bipolar depressive symptoms, without causing more frequent adverse effects/discontinuations."( Lamotrigine compared to placebo and other agents with antidepressant activity in patients with unipolar and bipolar depression: a comprehensive meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes in short-term trials.
Anghelescu, IG; Correll, CU; Gao, K; Normann, C; Reis, C; Schaffer, A; Solmi, M; van der Loos, ML; Veronese, N; Zaninotto, L, 2016
)
0.43
" Nevertheless, there is a dearth of information regarding their potential adverse effects on non-target organisms."( Multi-biomarker investigation to assess toxicity induced by two antidepressants on Dreissena polymorpha.
Binelli, A; Catani, M; Cavazzini, A; de Oliveira, LF; Della Torre, C; Guzzinati, R; Magni, S; Parolini, M, 2017
)
0.46
" Quality of life was assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12) and safety by adverse events, laboratory investigations, vital signs and physical findings."( Efficacy and safety of escitalopram in treatment of severe depression in Chinese population.
Cuili, H; Dong, J; Fang, M; Fang, Y; Li, J; Rui, Q; Shen, X; Si, T; Wang, G; Wang, J; Yang, F; Zhuo, J, 2017
)
0.76
" Therefore, we aimed to clarify the toxic effects of CTL on the reproductive system of male rats."( Citalopram Induces Reproductive Toxicity in Male Rats.
Atli, O; Baysal, M; Ilgin, S; Kilic, G; Kilic, V; Korkut, B; Ucarcan, S, 2017
)
1.9
" Participants were surveilled for adverse health outcomes."( Efficacy and Safety of Citalopram Compared to Atypical Antipsychotics on Agitation in Nursing Home Residents With Alzheimer Dementia.
Chiriac, IM; Ettorre, E; Viscogliosi, G, 2017
)
0.77
"Citalopram resulted in similar efficacy and less adverse outcomes when compared to 2 atypical antipsychotics for treatment of agitation in NH residents with AD."( Efficacy and Safety of Citalopram Compared to Atypical Antipsychotics on Agitation in Nursing Home Residents With Alzheimer Dementia.
Chiriac, IM; Ettorre, E; Viscogliosi, G, 2017
)
2.21
" Side effect data were available at weeks 2-4, 6 and 9 in three samples."( Effect of cytochrome CYP2C19 metabolizing activity on antidepressant response and side effects: Meta-analysis of data from genome-wide association studies.
Aitchison, KJ; Biernacka, JM; Breen, G; Craig, I; Curtis, C; Fabbri, C; Farmer, A; Hauser, J; Henigsberg, N; Jenkins, G; Lee, SH; Lewis, CM; Lewis, G; Maier, W; McGuffin, P; Mors, O; Newhouse, S; O'Donovan, M; Patel, H; Perlis, RH; Placentino, A; Rietschel, M; Schruers, K; Souery, D; Tansey, KE; Uher, R; Weinshilboum, RM, 2018
)
0.48
" Agomelatine was well-tolerated, with a lower incidence of adverse events than escitalopram."( 12-week double-blind randomized multicenter study of efficacy and safety of agomelatine (25-50 mg/day) versus escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) in out-patients with severe generalized anxiety disorder.
Ahokas, A; Bauer, M; Bitter, I; de Bodinat, C; Hӧschl, C; Jarema, M; Khoo, JP; Matharan, S; Mosolov, SN; Olivier, V; Picarel-Blanchot, F; Stein, DJ; Van Ameringen, M; Vavrusova, L, 2018
)
0.92
" The rate of adverse effects also showed no significant difference between citalopram and other antidepressants [P > ."( Efficacy and Safety of Citalopram for the Treatment of Poststroke Depression: A Meta-Analysis.
Cui, M; Huang, CY; Wang, F, 2018
)
1.02
" The adverse effects of citalopram have no significant difference compared to other antidepressants and those adverse effects are less and mild."( Efficacy and Safety of Citalopram for the Treatment of Poststroke Depression: A Meta-Analysis.
Cui, M; Huang, CY; Wang, F, 2018
)
1.1
" Adverse events (AEs) were assessed with the Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS)."( A controlled study of the efficacy and safety of tandospirone citrate combined with escitalopram in the treatment of vascular depression: A pilot randomized controlled trial at a single-center in China.
Chen, H; Chen, R; Lin, F; Lin, Q; Lin, T; Lin, X; Lin, Y; Luo, L; Xiao, Y, 2019
)
0.74
" The most common (>20%) adverse events reported for esketamine/antidepressant were nausea, dissociation, dizziness, vertigo, and headache."( Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a New Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study (TRANSFORM-1).
Ameele, HVD; Blier, P; Daly, EJ; Drevets, WC; Fava, M; Fedgchin, M; Gaillard, R; Hough, D; Lane, R; Liebowitz, M; Lim, P; Manji, H; Melkote, R; Preskorn, S; Ravindran, A; Singh, JB; Trivedi, M; Vitagliano, D, 2019
)
0.51
" Adverse events were reported by 313 patients (bupropion XL, n = 157; escitalopram, n = 156); the most common on-treatment adverse event in both groups was nausea (10."( Efficacy and safety of bupropion hydrochloride extended-release versus escitalopram oxalate in Chinese patients with major depressive disorder: Results from a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.
Hu, J; Li, H; Li, Y; Shen, Y; Tan, Y; Wang, Z; Xu, X; Yu, Y; Zhang, H; Zhao, Q; Zhong, J, 2019
)
0.98
" Side effects were assessed with the Toronto Side Effect Scale after 2 weeks of treatment with escitalopram."( Association Between Side Effects and Blood microRNA Expression Levels and Their Targeted Pathways in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Treated by a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor, Escitalopram: A CAN-BIND-1 Report.
Fiori, LM; Foster, JA; Frey, BN; Kennedy, SH; Lam, RW; MacQueen, GM; Milev, R; Müller, DJ; Turecki, G; Yrondi, A, 2020
)
0.96
" No significant differences were observed in response rate, remission rate, relapse rate and adverse events, while, the relapse time in riluzole group was longer than placebo group."( Efficacy and safety of riluzole for depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.
Wang, G; Wang, H; Wu, C; Yao, R; Yuan, M, 2020
)
0.56
" Adverse effects were assessed by the Adverse Events Scale."( The therapeutic effects and safety of bright light therapy combined with escitalopram oxalate on insomnia in patients with poststroke depression.
Chen, S; Feng, L; He, J; Luan, X; Wang, Q; Xiao, M, 2021
)
0.85
" Both treatments improved BI score, with no statistical difference, and were well tolerated, with few significant differences in treatment-associated adverse events."( The therapeutic effects and safety of bright light therapy combined with escitalopram oxalate on insomnia in patients with poststroke depression.
Chen, S; Feng, L; He, J; Luan, X; Wang, Q; Xiao, M, 2021
)
0.85
"Sexual dysfunction is a common adverse effect in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors users."( Resolution of Citalopram Sexual Adverse Effects With Low Dose of Cariprazine: A Case Report.
Dieci, M; Mansi, G; Trama, A,
)
0.49
"Information on rare adverse effects is often limited when a medication is initially approved for marketing."( Regulatory post-market drug safety advisories on cardiac harm: A comparison of four national regulatory agencies.
Bhasale, A; Fabbri, A; Hooimeyer, A; McEwin, E; Mintzes, B; Mohammad, A; Perry, L, 2020
)
0.56
" Due to many contradictory findings on the adverse effects and toxicities of SSRIs (especially genotoxicities), we reviewed the genotoxic effects of these drugs."( A Systematic Review on the Genotoxic Effects of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors.
Abbaszadegan, MR; Ahmadimanesh, M; Hedayati, N; Jamialahmadi, T; Sahebkar, A; Yazdian-Robati, R, 2021
)
0.62
" magna was studied to assess the toxic persistence of those pollutants."( Combined toxicity and toxicity persistence of antidepressants citalopram and mirtazapine to zooplankton Daphnia magna.
Chen, J; Guo, R; Li, C; Li, Y; Liu, Y; Ma, Y; Wei, S; Xu, D, 2022
)
0.96

Pharmacokinetics

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between escitalopram and ritonavir after concomitant administration of a single dose of each in healthy young subjects.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" From a clinical point of view, it is of relevance that potency to inhibit the cytochrome P450 isozyme CYP2D6 gradually decreases from paroxetine, fluoxetine, norfluoxetine, desmethylcitalopram, fluvoxamine, and sertraline down to citalopram, explaining to a great extent differences in pharmacokinetic interactions between the SSRIs and tricyclic antidepressants, which are metabolized by this enzyme."( Comparative pharmacokinetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a look behind the mirror.
Baumann, P; Rochat, B, 1995
)
0.48
" Both the sparteine and the mephenytoin oxidation polymorphism thus appear to contribute partially to the total pharmacokinetic variability of citalopram."( Pharmacokinetics of citalopram in relation to the sparteine and the mephenytoin oxidation polymorphisms.
Aaes-Jørgensen, T; Brøsen, K; Gram, LF; Hansen, MG; Overø, KF; Sindrup, SH, 1993
)
0.81
" No evidence was seen of a pharmacokinetic interaction between CIT and Li, and this combination was well tolerated."( A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of citalopram with and without lithium in the treatment of therapy-resistant depressive patients: a clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacogenetic investigation.
Amey, M; Baettig, D; Baumann, P; Jonzier-Perey, M; Kasas, A; Lambert, S; Montaldi, S; Nil, R; Souche, A; Uehlinger, C, 1996
)
0.56
" According to a previous in vitro study, this pharmacokinetic interaction occurs on the level of CYP2C19, but also of CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 which, in contrast to CYP1A2, contribute to the N-demethylation of citalopram and which are stereoselectively inhibited by fluvoxamine."( Non-response to citalopram in depressive patients: pharmacokinetic and clinical consequences of a fluvoxamine augmentation.
Baumann, P; Bertschy, G; Bondolfi, G; Chautems, C; Rochat, B, 1996
)
0.83
" Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were obtained over a 168 h period after warfarin dosing."( Investigation of multiple dose citalopram on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of racemic warfarin.
Davis, JD; Khan, AZ; Larsen, F; Priskorn, M; Rolan, PE; Sidhu, JS, 1997
)
0.58
" Comparable pharmacokinetic variability was noted for (+)-(S)-, (-)-(R)- and rac-citalopram."( Steady-state pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of citalopram and its metabolites in humans.
Grollier, G; Larsen, F; Poulsen, M; Priskorn, M; Segonzac, A; Sidhu, J, 1997
)
0.77
" Serum Cmax and t(max) for citalopram were essentially unaffected by the occurrence of renal or hepatic disease."( Single-dose pharmacokinetics of citalopram in patients with moderate renal insufficiency or hepatic cirrhosis compared with healthy subjects.
Aaes-Jørgensen, T; Joffe, P; Larsen, FS; Pedersen, V; Ring-Larsen, H; Sidhu, J, 1998
)
0.88
" They differ, however, in their pharmacokinetic properties."( Pharmacokinetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
Härtter, S; Hiemke, C, 2000
)
0.31
"To compare the steady-state pharmacokinetics of citalopram after multiple-dose administration in elderly and young subjects, and to correlate pharmacokinetic measurements with tolerability."( Steady-state pharmacokinetics of citalopram in young and elderly subjects.
Abramowitz, W; Gutierrez, M, 2000
)
0.84
" However, only half-life was statistically different between the groups, 30% longer in the elderly."( Steady-state pharmacokinetics of citalopram in young and elderly subjects.
Abramowitz, W; Gutierrez, M, 2000
)
0.59
"This study was undertaken to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of oral solution and tablet formulations of citalopram in healthy volunteers."( Pharmacokinetic comparison of oral solution and tablet formulations of citalopram: a single-dose, randomized, crossover study.
Abramowitz, W; Gutierrez, MM, 2000
)
0.75
" The rate and extent of absorption were similar between the 2 formulations, and no statistically significant differences were observed in half-life or oral clearance between formulations."( Pharmacokinetic comparison of oral solution and tablet formulations of citalopram: a single-dose, randomized, crossover study.
Abramowitz, W; Gutierrez, MM, 2000
)
0.54
" The aim of the present study was to determine the acute pharmacodynamic effects of citalopram and venlafaxine, on cognitive and psychomotor performance."( Serotonin, noradrenaline and cognitive function: a preliminary investigation of the acute pharmacodynamic effects of a serotonin versus a serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor.
Nathan, PJ; Sali, A; Silberstein, RB; Sitaram, G; Stough, C, 2000
)
0.53
" The pharmacokinetic profile of citalopram administered alone was essentially identical to that when administered with ketoconazole."( Lack of effect of a single dose of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of citalopram.
Abramowitz, W; Gutierrez, M, 2001
)
0.82
"There were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the pharmacokinetic parameters with the exception of the renal clearance of citalopram, which was significantly lower in the renal failure group than in the control group (1."( Citalopram pharmacokinetics in patients with chronic renal failure and the effect of haemodialysis.
Dahlqvist, R; Hägg, S; Spigset, O; Stegmayr, B, 2000
)
1.95
" There were no statistically significant differences in any of the digoxin pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC(0-->24), AUC(0-->infinity), Cmax, tmax, t(1/2), CL/F, CLrenal, and Ae(0-->infinity)), and the 90% confidence intervals for treatment differences for the parameters (except for tmax) were all within 80% to 125%."( Lack of citalopram effect on oral digoxin pharmacokinetics.
Larsen, F; Overø, KF; Priskorn, M, 2001
)
0.74
" At the pharmacodynamic level there have been a few documented cases of serotonin syndrome with citalopram and moclobemide and buspirone."( Review of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction studies with citalopram.
Brøsen, K; Naranjo, CA, 2001
)
0.76
" DOM brain levels were measured using a GC-MS method both in the presence and absence of citalopram and fluoxetine in order to evaluate the pharmacokinetic contribution to the observed behavioral effect."( Potentiation of DOM-induced stimulus control by fluoxetine and citalopram: role of pharmacokinetics.
Doat, MM; Eckler, JR; Rabin, RA; Winter, JC, 2002
)
0.78
"The aim of this study was to investigate the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between escitalopram and ritonavir after concomitant administration of a single dose of each in healthy young subjects."( An evaluation of the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between escitalopram and the cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor ritonavir.
Abramowitz, W; Gutierrez, MM; Rosenberg, J, 2003
)
0.77
" Blood was collected and plasma was analyzed for the pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum plasma concentration [C(max)], time to C(max) [T(max)], area under the plasma concentration-time curve, plasma elimination half-life, oral clearance, and apparent volume of distribution) of escitalopram, S-DCT, and ritonavir."( An evaluation of the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between escitalopram and the cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor ritonavir.
Abramowitz, W; Gutierrez, MM; Rosenberg, J, 2003
)
0.73
" The pharmacokinetic parameters of ritonavir were also unaffected by coadministration of escitalopram."( An evaluation of the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between escitalopram and the cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor ritonavir.
Abramowitz, W; Gutierrez, MM; Rosenberg, J, 2003
)
0.77
"In general, no pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between escitalopram and ritonavir in the present study."( An evaluation of the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between escitalopram and the cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor ritonavir.
Abramowitz, W; Gutierrez, MM; Rosenberg, J, 2003
)
0.79
" Building on the existing in vitro and in vivo evidence that suggest a minimal effect of citalopram on cytochrome P450 3A4, we hypothesized that therapeutic doses of citalopram (20 mg/d), as compared with fluoxetine (20 mg/d), would cause less impairment in the metabolism of the probe drug alprazolam (1 mg) through inhibition of the cytochrome P450 3A4 isozyme as measured by pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters in vivo."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of the inhibition of alprazolam by citalopram and fluoxetine.
Hall, J; Herrmann, N; Naranjo, CA; Sproule, BA, 2003
)
0.77
" Terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) values of citalopram in poor metabolizers were significantly higher than the values in extensive metabolizers who were either homozygous or heterozygous with CYP2C19*1."( Pharmacokinetics of citalopram in relation to genetic polymorphism of CYP2C19.
Chen, GL; Chen, XP; He, N; Liu, ZQ; Ouyang, DS; Yu, BN; Zhou, HH, 2003
)
0.9
" A comparison is also presented between several methods based on animal pharmacokinetic data, using the same set of proprietary compounds, and it lends further support for the use of this method, as opposed to methods that require the gathering of pharmacokinetic data in laboratory animals."( Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
Gao, F; Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Shalaeva, MY, 2004
)
0.32
" On the other hand, age and sex had a significant influence on the pharmacokinetic pattern of trazodone, causing higher concentrations in females and in older patients."( Therapeutic drug monitoring of trazodone: are there pharmacokinetic interactions involving citalopram and fluoxetine?
Conca, A; König, P; Moll, W; Prapotnik, M; Waschgler, R, 2004
)
0.54
" The role of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, as well as sensitivity to placebo injections, in influencing the neuroendocrine response to citalopram was then evaluated."( Neuroendocrine response to intravenous citalopram in healthy control subjects: pharmacokinetic influences.
Bies, R; Lotrich, FE; Manuck, SB; Muldoon, MF; Pollock, BG; Smith, GS, 2005
)
0.8
"Human pharmacokinetic parameters are often predicted prior to clinical study from in vivo preclinical pharmacokinetic data."( Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
Jolivette, LJ; Ward, KW, 2005
)
0.33
"In view of the good tolerability of escitalopram, the pharmacokinetic changes observed on co-administration with cimetidine or omeprazole are unlikely to be of clinical concern."( The effect of cimetidine or omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of escitalopram in healthy subjects.
Malling, D; Poulsen, MN; Søgaard, B, 2005
)
0.83
" The aim of this study was to explore a fully Bayesian methodology for population pharmacokinetic analysis of data that arose from deliberate self-poisoning with citalopram."( The population pharmacokinetics of citalopram after deliberate self-poisoning: a Bayesian approach.
Duffull, SB; Friberg, LE; Hackett, LP; Isbister, GK, 2005
)
0.8
"Integrated in vivo models applying intracerebral microdialysis in conjunction with automated serial blood sampling in conscious, freely moving rodents are an attractive approach for pharmacokinetic (PK) and simultaneous pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) investigations of CNS active drugs within the same animal."( An integrated microdialysis rat model for multiple pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic investigations of serotonergic agents.
Bundgaard, C; Jørgensen, M; Mørk, A,
)
0.13
" The elimination half-life of escitalopram is about 27-33 hours and is consistent with once-daily administration."( The clinical pharmacokinetics of escitalopram.
Rao, N, 2007
)
0.9
"The average bioavailability and pharmacokinetic parameters of the two citalopram tablets were as follows: peak plasma concentration Cmax was 35."( Pharmacokinetic comparison of two 40 mg tablet formulations of citalopram using a new amperometric detection technique.
Al-Ghazawi, M; Mohsen, M; Najjar, S; Tutunji, M, 2007
)
0.81
"Based on the pharmacokinetic and statistical results, it was concluded that Lecital 40 mg tablets of JOSWE is bioequivalent to Cipramil 40 mg tablets of Lundbeck (Denmark)."( Pharmacokinetic comparison of two 40 mg tablet formulations of citalopram using a new amperometric detection technique.
Al-Ghazawi, M; Mohsen, M; Najjar, S; Tutunji, M, 2007
)
0.58
" The pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that systemic clearance decreased as a function of dose, which was incorporated in the integrated model."( Pharmacokinetic modelling of blood-brain barrier transport of escitalopram in rats.
Bundgaard, C; Jørgensen, M; Larsen, F, 2007
)
0.58
"We sought to determine whether clinical response or tolerance to the Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram is associated with genetic polymorphisms in potentially relevant pharmacokinetic enzymes."( Pharmacokinetic genes do not influence response or tolerance to citalopram in the STAR*D sample.
Hamilton, SP; Jenkins, GD; Kraft, JB; McGrath, PJ; Peters, EJ; Reinalda, MS; Slager, SL, 2008
)
0.79
" Fifteen polymorphisms from five (CYP2D6, ABCB1, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5) pharmacokinetic genes were genotyped."( Pharmacokinetic genes do not influence response or tolerance to citalopram in the STAR*D sample.
Hamilton, SP; Jenkins, GD; Kraft, JB; McGrath, PJ; Peters, EJ; Reinalda, MS; Slager, SL, 2008
)
0.58
"No genetic polymorphism in the pharmacokinetic genes examined was significantly associated with our response or tolerance phenotypes in both stages."( Pharmacokinetic genes do not influence response or tolerance to citalopram in the STAR*D sample.
Hamilton, SP; Jenkins, GD; Kraft, JB; McGrath, PJ; Peters, EJ; Reinalda, MS; Slager, SL, 2008
)
0.58
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
" Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis of ADTs."( The pharmacokinetics of standard antidepressants with aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy: studies in healthy subjects and in patients with major depressive disorder.
Balch, AH; Berman, RM; Boulton, DW; Mallikaarjun, S; Patel, CG; Reeves, RA; Royzman, K, 2010
)
0.36
"The objective of this study was to compare population pharmacokinetic models of escitalopram developed from dosage times recorded by a medication event monitoring system (MEMS) versus the reported times from patients with diagnosed depression."( The effect of reporting methods for dosing times on the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters of escitalopram.
Bies, RR; Fagiolini, A; Feng, Y; Florian, J; Frank, E; Gastonguay, MR; Jin, Y; Kepple, G; Kirshner, M; Kupfer, DJ; Pollock, BG, 2009
)
0.79
" Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 156 h post-dose, and escitalopram plasma concentrations were determined with a validated liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS) method."( Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of escitalopram oxalate formulations after single-dose administration in healthy Chinese male volunteers.
Chen, Y; Li, J; Ren, X; Tian, Y; Wang, N; Zhang, ZJ, 2009
)
0.83
" The aim of the present pilot study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of brand-name and generic formulations of citalopram and extended-release venlafaxine."( Comparison of pharmacokinetic profiles of brand-name and generic formulations of citalopram and venlafaxine: a crossover study.
Batten, LA; Blier, P; Chenu, F; Hébert, C; Ladstaetter, E; Zernig, G, 2009
)
0.79
" Validation results and its application to the analysis of plasma samples after oral administration of citalopram in healthy Chinese volunteers demonstrated the method was applicable to pharmacokinetic studies."( Simultaneous determination of citalopram and its metabolite in human plasma by LC-MS/MS applied to pharmacokinetic study.
Chen, B; Chen, C; Chen, H; Jiang, T; Lu, Y; Peng, L; Rong, Z; Sun, J; Xie, Y; Xu, Y, 2010
)
0.86
" This novel method has been applied to a pharmacokinetic study and to estimate brain-to-plasma ratio of S-CPM in rats."( A highly sensitive LC-MS/MS method for the determination of S-citalopram in rat plasma: application to a pharmacokinetic study in rats.
Giri, S; Husain, R; Mullangi, R; Suresh, PS, 2010
)
0.6
"3, first for a population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis followed by a PKPD analysis."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of escitalopram in overdose and the effect of activated charcoal.
Duffull, S; Hackett, LP; Isbister, GK; van Gorp, F, 2012
)
0.63
" Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were obtained during a 168-hour period after dosing."( The perception and pharmacokinetics of a 20-mg dose of escitalopram orodispersible tablets in a relative bioavailability study in healthy men.
Nilausen, DØ; van Gerven, J; Zuiker, RG, 2011
)
0.61
"The assumed bioequivalence assessment was based on pharmacokinetic and statistical analysis of data from the 29 men who completed the 3 treatments."( The perception and pharmacokinetics of a 20-mg dose of escitalopram orodispersible tablets in a relative bioavailability study in healthy men.
Nilausen, DØ; van Gerven, J; Zuiker, RG, 2011
)
0.61
"A sensitive, rapid and simple liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) method was developed for the quantitative determination of cyclobenzaprine in human plasma, to study the pharmacokinetic behavior of cyclobenzaprine capsule in healthy Chinese volunteers."( Determination of cyclobenzaprine in human plasma by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry and its application in a pharmacokinetic study.
Chen, X; Jiang, H; Li, D; Peng, K; Qian, Z; Xiang, Y; Zheng, H; Zhou, L, 2012
)
0.38
" The half-life of the racemic mixture of citalopram after intragastric administration was increased by about 287%."( Influence of tobacco smoke on the pharmacokinetics of citalopram and its enantiomers.
Florek, E; Jawien, W; Kulza, M; Majcherczyk, J; Piekoszewski, W; Senczuk-Przybylowska, M, 2012
)
0.89
"The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic characteristics of a new and a branded citalopram 20 mg formulation to support the marketing authorization of the test formulation in China."( Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability comparison of generic and branded citalopram 20 mg tablets: an open-label, randomized-sequence, two-period crossover study in healthy Chinese CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers.
Chen, B; Chen, C; Chen, H; Jiang, T; Li, H; Lu, Y; Rong, Z; Shen, Y; Sun, J; Xie, Y; Xu, Y, 2013
)
0.84
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated and analysed statistically."( Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability comparison of generic and branded citalopram 20 mg tablets: an open-label, randomized-sequence, two-period crossover study in healthy Chinese CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers.
Chen, B; Chen, C; Chen, H; Jiang, T; Li, H; Lu, Y; Rong, Z; Shen, Y; Sun, J; Xie, Y; Xu, Y, 2013
)
0.62
" Both formulations showed similar pharmacokinetic profiles."( Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability comparison of generic and branded citalopram 20 mg tablets: an open-label, randomized-sequence, two-period crossover study in healthy Chinese CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers.
Chen, B; Chen, C; Chen, H; Jiang, T; Li, H; Lu, Y; Rong, Z; Shen, Y; Sun, J; Xie, Y; Xu, Y, 2013
)
0.62
" Individual pharmacokinetic parameters cannot be directly estimated if full pharmacokinetic profiles are not available for each subject."( How to combine non-compartmental analysis with the population pharmacokinetics? A study of tobacco smoke's influence on the bioavailability of racemic citalopram in rats.
Florek, E; Jawień, W; Kulza, M; Majcherczyk, J; Piekoszewski, W, 2013
)
0.59
" Combining NLME with NCA may therefore be recommended for investigating pharmacokinetic properties of the drug in the sparse designs."( How to combine non-compartmental analysis with the population pharmacokinetics? A study of tobacco smoke's influence on the bioavailability of racemic citalopram in rats.
Florek, E; Jawień, W; Kulza, M; Majcherczyk, J; Piekoszewski, W, 2013
)
0.59
" We attempted to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model of CIT in Chinese healthy subjects, to evaluate the effect of genetic polymorphism on CIT pharmacokinetics and to compare the PPK and non-compartmental (NCA) assays in the estimation of CIT bioequivalence."( Estimation of CYP2D6*10 genotypes on citalopram disposition in Chinese subjects by population pharmacokinetic assay.
Adeniyi, O; Chen, B; Chen, H; Feng, R; Jiang, T; Li, J; Sun, J; Xu, Y; Yang, W; Zhang, W, 2013
)
0.66
"Due to pharmacokinetic interactions, citalopram plasma concentrations are often higher than expected with a given dose."( Influence of concomitant medications on the total clearance and the risk for supra-therapeutic plasma concentrations of Citalopram. A population-based cohort study.
Brandl, R; Haen, E; Hiemke, C; Wenzel-Seifert, K, 2014
)
0.88
" We investigated the two-way pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction and tolerability of concomitant administration of the SSRI citalopram and the HIV-1 integrase inhibitor raltegravir in healthy volunteers."( Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study between raltegravir and citalopram.
Blonk, MI; Burger, DM; Colbers, AP; Hoogtanders, KE; Langemeijer, CC; Schouwenberg, BJ; van Schaik, RH, 2016
)
0.88
" Intensive steady-state pharmacokinetic blood sampling was performed."( Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study between raltegravir and citalopram.
Blonk, MI; Burger, DM; Colbers, AP; Hoogtanders, KE; Langemeijer, CC; Schouwenberg, BJ; van Schaik, RH, 2016
)
0.67
" A nonlinear mixed effects population pharmacokinetic modeling approach was used to describe the pharmacokinetics of R- and S-citalopram and their primary metabolite (desmethylcitalopram)."( A population pharmacokinetic model for R- and S-citalopram and desmethylcitalopram in Alzheimer's disease patients with agitation.
Akil, A; Avramopoulos, D; Bies, RR; Devanand, DP; Lyketsos, CG; Mintzer, JE; Pollock, BG; Porsteinsson, AP; Schneider, LS; Shade, DM; Weintraub, D; Yesavage, J, 2016
)
0.9
" Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected and ECG was performed up to 48 h postdose."( Pharmacokinetics and effect on the corrected QT interval of single-dose escitalopram in healthy elderly compared with younger adults.
Cho, JY; Chung, H; Chung, JY; Kim, A; Lim, KS; Park, SI; Yoon, SH; Yu, KS, 2017
)
0.69
"The purpose of this study was to identify specific pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) factors that affect the likelihood of treatment remission with a serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) in depressed patients whose initial selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) failed."( Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic interaction associated with venlafaxine-XR remission in patients with major depressive disorder with history of citalopram / escitalopram treatment failure.
Ahmed, AT; Biernacka, JM; Bobo, WV; Frye, MA; Hall-Flavin, DK; Jenkins, G; Kung, S; Rush, AJ; Shinozaki, G; Veldic, M; Wang, L; Weinshilboum, RM, 2019
)
0.71
"The aims of this study were to characterize escitalopram pharmacokinetic profile, to identify factors influencing drug exposure, notably drug-drug interactions with antiretrovirals, and to simulate expected exposure under standard dosage regimen."( Escitalopram population pharmacokinetics in people living with human immunodeficiency virus and in the psychiatric population: Drug-drug interactions and probability of target attainment.
Alves Saldanha, S; Buclin, T; Cavassini, M; Courlet, P; Csajka, C; Decosterd, LA; Eap, CB; Glatard, A; Guidi, M; Marzolini, C, 2019
)
1.49
"A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM."( Escitalopram population pharmacokinetics in people living with human immunodeficiency virus and in the psychiatric population: Drug-drug interactions and probability of target attainment.
Alves Saldanha, S; Buclin, T; Cavassini, M; Courlet, P; Csajka, C; Decosterd, LA; Eap, CB; Glatard, A; Guidi, M; Marzolini, C, 2019
)
1.24
" This analysis aimed to evaluate the ability of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling to predict exposure of CYP2C19 substrates (lansoprazole, (es)citalopram, voriconazole) across Caucasian and East Asian populations."( Assessing pharmacokinetic differences in Caucasian and East Asian (Japanese, Chinese and Korean) populations driven by CYP2C19 polymorphism using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling.
Al-Huniti, N; Higashimori, M; Sharma, P; Xu, H; Yeo, KR; Zhou, D; Zhou, L, 2019
)
0.71
" A population pharmacokinetic model that aimed to better characterize maternal and infant exposure to SCIT and its metabolite was developed."( A population pharmacokinetic model for escitalopram and its major metabolite in depressive patients during the perinatal period: Prediction of infant drug exposure through breast milk.
Beaufils, E; Bickle Graz, M; Borradori Tolsa, C; Claris, O; Csajka, C; Eap, CB; Epiney, M; Fischer, CJ; Gaucherand, P; Guidi, M; Hascoët, JM; Kassai-Koupai, B; Morisod Harari, M; Nguyen, KA; Panchaud, A; Rothenburger, S; Rouiller, S; Tolsa, JF; Vial, Y; Weisskopf, E, 2020
)
0.82
"Fifty-five pregnant women with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) diagnoses of affective disorders, treated with SSRIs/SNRIs, were recruited and, during the third trimester, their blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic analyses."( Correlation between pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Selective Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors and maternal and neonatal outcomes: Results from a naturalistic study in patients with affec
Bosi, MF; Cafaro, R; Cetin, I; Clementi, E; Colombo, A; Dell'Osso, B; Di Bernardo, I; Giordano, F; Giorgetti, F; Pileri, P; Varinelli, A; Viganò, CA, 2021
)
0.62
" This study thus aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model to characterize the relationship between escitalopram concentrations and the delayed effect on QT prolongation."( Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of delayed effect of escitalopram-induced QT prolongation.
Chung, JY; Kim, A; Kim, Y, 2021
)
1.05
" In this single-centre, single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, sequential design Phase 1 study with the inclusion of two double-blind crossover parts, the pharmacokinetic (PK; blood sampling at regular intervals) and pharmacodynamic (PD; battery of objective and subjective PD tests performed at regular intervals) interactions between daridorexant (50 mg) and citalopram (20 mg, single dose and at steady state) as well as the safety/tolerability in healthy subjects were investigated."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between daridorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, and citalopram in healthy subjects.
Berger, B; Dingemanse, J; Kornberger, R, 2021
)
1
"Further pharmacokinetic examination of the interaction between CBD and citalopram/escitalopram is clearly warranted, and clinicians should be vigilant around the possibility of treatment-emergent adverse effects when CBD is introduced to patients taking these antidepressants."( Citalopram and Cannabidiol: In Vitro and In Vivo Evidence of Pharmacokinetic Interactions Relevant to the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders in Young People.
Amminger, GP; Anderson, LL; Arnold, JC; Berger, M; Doohan, PT; Kevin, RC; McGregor, IS; Oldfield, L,
)
1.81
" The validated methods were successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study in which 20-mg CTP tablets were administered to healthy volunteers, and their plasma levels were monitored over time in a bioequivalence study."( Selective LC-MS/MS determination of citalopram enantiomers and application to a pharmacokinetic evaluation of generic and reference formulations.
Bedor, DCG; Bedor, NCTC; de Castro, WV; de Oliveira, GHO; de Santana, DP; de Sousa, CEM; Leal, LB; Sousa, GD, 2022
)
1

Compound-Compound Interactions

Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX), an amphetamine pro-drug that is approved for the treatment of ADHD on acetylcholine and histamine efflux. High-frequency rTMS over the left cortex is an add-on strategy of clinical significance in combination with escitalopram in patients with major depression resistant to non-tricyclic antidepressants.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" When administered in combination with citalopram, an attenuation of the power density reduction in the 7-15 Hz range in the FF EEG of citalopram alone, was observed."( Sleep and EEG power spectrum effects of the 5-HT1A antagonist NAN-190 alone and in combination with citalopram.
Bjorvatn, B; Bjørkum, AA; Neckelmann, D; Ursin, R, 1996
)
0.78
"This 6-week, open-label, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of quetiapine in combination with citalopram in adult patients (n=25) with ICD-10/DSM-IV unipolar psychotic depression."( Quetiapine in combination with citalopram in patients with unipolar psychotic depression.
Aschauer, H; Hrubos, W; Kasper, S; Konstantinidis, A; Lehofer, M; Nirnberger, G; Windhager, E, 2007
)
0.84
" Results of this study support further examination of citalopram in combination with behavioral therapy as a treatment for cocaine dependence."( Citalopram combined with behavioral therapy reduces cocaine use: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Grabowski, J; Green, CM; Lai, LY; Moeller, FG; Reist, C; Schmitz, JM; Steinberg, JL; Swann, AC, 2007
)
2.03
"A modified solvent microextraction with back extraction method (SME/BE) combined with high performance liquid chromatography and fluorescence detection (HPLC-FD) was developed for the determination of citalopram in human plasma."( Modified solvent microextraction with back extraction combined with liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection for the determination of citalopram in human plasma.
Babanezhad, E; Bagheri, H; Es-haghi, A; Khalilian, F; Rouini, MR, 2008
)
0.74
"In patients with medication-resistant major depression we administered in a randomised trial 15 sessions of sham-controlled rTMS over three weeks in combination with 20 mg escitalopram daily."( Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in combination with escitalopram in patients with treatment-resistant major depression: a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial.
Bech, P; Bretlau, LG; Dissing, S; Lindberg, L; Lunde, M; Undén, M, 2008
)
0.77
"High-frequency rTMS over the left cortex is an add-on strategy of clinical significance in combination with escitalopram in patients with major depression resistant to non-tricyclic antidepressants."( Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in combination with escitalopram in patients with treatment-resistant major depression: a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial.
Bech, P; Bretlau, LG; Dissing, S; Lindberg, L; Lunde, M; Undén, M, 2008
)
0.79
"To determine the efficacy of eszopiclone combined with escitalopram oxalate in treating insomnia comorbid with GAD."( Eszopiclone coadministered with escitalopram in patients with insomnia and comorbid generalized anxiety disorder.
Huang, H; Kinrys, G; Krishnan, R; Krystal, A; McCall, WV; Pollack, M; Roach, J; Roth, T; Rubens, R; Schaefer, K, 2008
)
0.87
" The aim of this study was to investigate the toxic effects and toxicokinetic parameters of citalopram in an overdose as a single drug and in combination with other drugs."( Clinical toxicology of citalopram after acute intoxication with the sole drug or in combination with other drugs: overview of 26 cases.
Caminada, K; Hunfeld, NG; Jimmink, A; Touw, DJ, 2008
)
0.88
"To present an economic model and cost-effectiveness estimates of switching to bupropion compared to combination with bupropion after failure of an SSRI for major depressive disorder (MDD)."( Developing thai economic model to study cost-effectiveness of switching to bupropion compared to combination with bupropion after the failure of an SSRI for major depressive disorder.
Leelahanaj, T, 2010
)
0.36
"To assess the early therapeutic and cognitive effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with antidepressant medication in treatment of first-episode patients with major depression."( [Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with antidepressant medication in treatment of first-episode patients with major depression].
Hu, JB; Hu, SH; Huang, ML; Luo, BY; Qi, HL; Wei, N; Xu, Y; Zhou, WH, 2011
)
0.37
"Sixty first-episode depressed inpatients aged 18-45 y, who met the DSM-IV clinical criteria for major depressive episode were randomly assigned to citalopram treatment (20 mg/d) in combination with a two-week period of either rTMS (study group)or sham procedure (control group) on left dorsal-lateral prefrontal cortex (10 Hz, 90% motor threshold)."( [Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with antidepressant medication in treatment of first-episode patients with major depression].
Hu, JB; Hu, SH; Huang, ML; Luo, BY; Qi, HL; Wei, N; Xu, Y; Zhou, WH, 2011
)
0.57
"To quantify the importance of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported with serotoninergic reuptake inhibitors in a pharmacovigilance database."( The importance of drug-drug interactions as a cause of adverse drug reactions: a pharmacovigilance study of serotoninergic reuptake inhibitors in France.
Bagheri, H; Bondon-Guitton, E; Bui, E; Durrieu, G; Lapeyre-Mestre, M; Montastruc, F; Montastruc, JL; Schmitt, L; Sommet, A, 2012
)
0.38
" This is partly explained by multiple drug use causing drug-drug interactions."( Serotonin syndrome during treatment with low dose of escitalopram associated with miconazole mucoadhesive tablet: a suspected drug interaction.
Baptista, G; Eiden, C; Jeandel, C; Monguillot, P; Philibert, C, 2012
)
0.63
"Quetiapine is now used in the treatment of unipolar and bipolar disorders, both alone and in combination with other medications."( Effects of sustained administration of quetiapine alone and in combination with a serotonin reuptake inhibitor on norepinephrine and serotonin transmission.
Blier, P; Chernoloz, O; El Mansari, M, 2012
)
0.38
"In a 2-week double-blind study with a 2-week extended antidepressant phase, 60 first-episode young major depressive patients were randomly assigned to citalopram in combination with 2 weeks of either active or sham rTMS treatment."( Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in combination with citalopram in young patients with first-episode major depressive disorder: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial.
Hu, JB; Hu, SH; Huang, ML; Luo, BY; Wang, SS; Wei, N; Xu, Y; Zhou, WH, 2012
)
0.82
" This practice of polypharmacy increases the possibility for drug-drug interactions."( Drug-drug conditioning between citalopram and haloperidol or olanzapine in a conditioned avoidance response model: implications for polypharmacy in schizophrenia.
Li, M; Sparkman, NL, 2012
)
0.66
" This drug combination resulted in marked prolongation of the QT interval that triggered the electrical storm."( Citalopram and levosulpiride: a dangerous drug combination for QT prolongation.
Agosti, S; Bertero, G; Brunelli, C; Burrone, A; Casalino, L; Morelloni, S, 2013
)
1.83
"To prospectively assess the efficacy of the selective serotonin inhibitor escitalopram on painful bone metastases, in combination with external beam irradiation."( Radiotherapy combined with daily escitalopram in patients with painful bone metastasis: clinical evaluation and quality of life measurements.
Fotineas, A; Kantzou, I; Kelekis, N; Kouloulias, V; Kouvaris, J; Nikolaou, K; Pantelakos, P; Platoni, K; Rizos, E; Sarris, G; Tolia, M; Zygogianni, A,
)
0.64
"Forty-three patients with cancer metastatic to bone and suffering from depression were treated with 3 Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3DCRT) (30 Gy; 3 Gy/fraction, 5 days/week) combined with escitalopram (20 mg/day)."( Radiotherapy combined with daily escitalopram in patients with painful bone metastasis: clinical evaluation and quality of life measurements.
Fotineas, A; Kantzou, I; Kelekis, N; Kouloulias, V; Kouvaris, J; Nikolaou, K; Pantelakos, P; Platoni, K; Rizos, E; Sarris, G; Tolia, M; Zygogianni, A,
)
0.6
" In the present study, we have examined the effect of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX), an amphetamine pro-drug that is approved for the treatment of ADHD on acetylcholine and histamine efflux in pre-frontal cortex and hippocampus alone and in combination with the anti-depressant s-citalopram."( Effects of lisdexamfetamine alone and in combination with s-citalopram on acetylcholine and histamine efflux in the rat pre-frontal cortex and ventral hippocampus.
Folgering, JH; Heins, MS; Hutson, PH, 2015
)
0.84
" When treating HIV-infected patients with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), potential drug-drug interactions with antiretroviral agents have to be taken into account."( Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study between raltegravir and citalopram.
Blonk, MI; Burger, DM; Colbers, AP; Hoogtanders, KE; Langemeijer, CC; Schouwenberg, BJ; van Schaik, RH, 2016
)
0.67
" Subjects received the following treatments: citalopram 20 mg once daily for 2 weeks followed by the combination with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 5 days and after a washout period raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 5 days."( Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study between raltegravir and citalopram.
Blonk, MI; Burger, DM; Colbers, AP; Hoogtanders, KE; Langemeijer, CC; Schouwenberg, BJ; van Schaik, RH, 2016
)
0.93
" The present work determines if AE-PG alone or in combination with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, citalopram, has antidepressant-like effects."( Aqueous Extract of Pomegranate Alone or in Combination with Citalopram Produces Antidepressant-Like Effects in an Animal Model of Menopause: Participation of Estrogen Receptors.
Estrada-Camarena, E; García-Viguera, C; González-Trujano, ME; López-Rubalcava, C; Valdés-Sustaita, B, 2017
)
0.91
" In 8% of all drug poisoning deaths, lifetime drug-drug interaction was evaluated having a contribution to the fatal outcome."( Completed suicides of citalopram users-the role of CYP genotypes and adverse drug interactions.
Haukka, J; Niemi, M; Ojanperä, I; Palo, JU; Pett, H; Rahikainen, AL; Sajantila, A; Vauhkonen, P, 2019
)
0.83
"The aims of this study were to characterize escitalopram pharmacokinetic profile, to identify factors influencing drug exposure, notably drug-drug interactions with antiretrovirals, and to simulate expected exposure under standard dosage regimen."( Escitalopram population pharmacokinetics in people living with human immunodeficiency virus and in the psychiatric population: Drug-drug interactions and probability of target attainment.
Alves Saldanha, S; Buclin, T; Cavassini, M; Courlet, P; Csajka, C; Decosterd, LA; Eap, CB; Glatard, A; Guidi, M; Marzolini, C, 2019
)
1.49
" Therefore we investigated whether there is a drug-drug interaction between tamoxifen and SRIs resulting in a prolonged QTc-interval."( The Risk of QTc-Interval Prolongation in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Tamoxifen in Combination with Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors.
Berger, FA; Binkhorst, L; de Groot, NMS; Hussaarts, KGAM; Mathijssen, RHJ; Mathijssen-van Stein, D; Oomen-de Hoop, E; van Alphen, RJ; van Gelder, T; van Leeuwen, RWF, 2019
)
0.51
"To investigate the therapeutic effects and safety of BLT combined with escitalopram oxalate (ESC) on insomnia in patients with PSD."( The therapeutic effects and safety of bright light therapy combined with escitalopram oxalate on insomnia in patients with poststroke depression.
Chen, S; Feng, L; He, J; Luan, X; Wang, Q; Xiao, M, 2021
)
1.08
"BLT combined with ESC is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of PSD-associated insomnia."( The therapeutic effects and safety of bright light therapy combined with escitalopram oxalate on insomnia in patients with poststroke depression.
Chen, S; Feng, L; He, J; Luan, X; Wang, Q; Xiao, M, 2021
)
0.85
" The aim of this study was to investigate the repurposing of escitalopram oxalate and clonazepam drugs individually, and in combination with the antibiotics ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, to treat multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms and to evaluate the potential chemical nuclease activity."( Repurposing of escitalopram oxalate and clonazepam in combination with ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim for treatment of multidrug-resistant microorganisms and evaluation of the cleavage capacity of plasmid DNA.
Bottega, A; Coelho, SS; Foletto, VS; Hörner, R; Lorenzoni, VV; Machado, CS; Mainardi, A; Rampelotto, RF; Rosa, TFD; Serafin, MB, 2021
)
1.2

Bioavailability

The inhibitory effects of escitalopram on erectile and vascular function were not accompanied by a change in endothelial nitric oxide synthase. This suggests that the inhibitory effect is caused by a decrease in nitricoxide bioavailability mediated by increased NADPH oxidase and r.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The absolute bioavailability of citalopram tablets in healthy subjects was 80%."( Single-dose pharmacokinetics of citalopram in patients with moderate renal insufficiency or hepatic cirrhosis compared with healthy subjects.
Aaes-Jørgensen, T; Joffe, P; Larsen, FS; Pedersen, V; Ring-Larsen, H; Sidhu, J, 1998
)
0.87
"The quantitative structure-bioavailability relationship of 232 structurally diverse drugs was studied to evaluate the feasibility of constructing a predictive model for the human oral bioavailability of prospective new medicinal agents."( QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
Topliss, JG; Yoshida, F, 2000
)
0.31
" The high bioavailability of citalopram indicates that the switch from intravenous to oral citalopram would prevent a deterioration of symptoms as plasma drug concentrations would be maintained."( Intravenous antidepressant treatment: focus on citalopram.
Kasper, S; Müller-Spahn, F, 2002
)
0.86
" An important reason is that, even at equal concentrations, the bioavailability of a drug depends on the interaction of the drug with the blood-brain barrier (BBB)."( abcb1ab P-glycoprotein is involved in the uptake of citalopram and trimipramine into the brain of mice.
Grauer, MT; Uhr, M,
)
0.38
"The aim of this study was to compare the bioavailability of two citalopram formulations (citalopram from Eurofarma Laboratórios Ltda."( A bioequivalence study of citalopram based on quantification by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry.
Barrientos-Astigarraga, RE; Borges, NC; De Nucci, G; Mendes, FD; Mendes, GD; Pereira, Ados S, 2005
)
0.87
" The effect of activated charcoal on clearance and bioavailability was pronounced and resulted in a 72% increase and 22% decrease, respectively."( The population pharmacokinetics of citalopram after deliberate self-poisoning: a Bayesian approach.
Duffull, SB; Friberg, LE; Hackett, LP; Isbister, GK, 2005
)
0.61
" The high bioavailability of citalopram permits the use of identical iv and oral doses."( [Safety and efficacy of oral escitalopram as continuation treatment of intravenous citalopram, in patients with major depressive disorder--the navigade switch study].
Arbus, C; Schmitt, L; Tonnoir, B,
)
0.71
" However, SSRI bioavailability and non-compliance represent major issues, especially in the clinical trials setting."( Fluorimetric quantitation of citalopram and escitalopram in plasma: developing an express method to monitor compliance in clinical trials.
Atar, D; Dragan, A; Dragan, V; Malinin, A; Serebruany, V; van Zyl, L, 2007
)
0.63
"The average bioavailability and pharmacokinetic parameters of the two citalopram tablets were as follows: peak plasma concentration Cmax was 35."( Pharmacokinetic comparison of two 40 mg tablet formulations of citalopram using a new amperometric detection technique.
Al-Ghazawi, M; Mohsen, M; Najjar, S; Tutunji, M, 2007
)
0.81
" Calculated with AUC(0-120 h), the bioavailability of two formulations was (102."( [Determination of citalopram in human plasma with LC-MS/MS method and its bioequivalent evaluation].
Cao, XQ; Chen, XY; Zhang, YF; Zhong, DF, 2007
)
0.67
" Escitalopram has favourable pharmacokinetics: it is rapidly absorbed, has a bioavailability of 80% and is not affected by food intake."( The use of escitalopram beyond major depression: pharmacological aspects, efficacy and tolerability in anxiety disorders.
Altamura, AC; Bareggi, SR; Dell'Osso, B; Mundo, E, 2007
)
1.33
"The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability of escitalopram (CAS 128196-01-0) from two escitalopram oxalate (CAS 219861-08-2) tablets (escitalopram 10 mg tablet as test preparation and 10 mg tablet commercially available original tablet of the drug as reference preparation) in 20 Chinese healthy male volunteers, aged between 19 and 27."( Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of escitalopram oxalate formulations after single-dose administration in healthy Chinese male volunteers.
Chen, Y; Li, J; Ren, X; Tian, Y; Wang, N; Zhang, ZJ, 2009
)
0.84
"Oral bioavailability (F) is a product of fraction absorbed (Fa), fraction escaping gut-wall elimination (Fg), and fraction escaping hepatic elimination (Fh)."( Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
Chang, G; El-Kattan, A; Miller, HR; Obach, RS; Rotter, C; Steyn, SJ; Troutman, MD; Varma, MV, 2010
)
0.36
" Selected derivatives showed good oral bioavailability (>30%) and brain penetration (B/B > 4) in rats associated with high in vitro potency and selectivity at SERT, NET, and DAT."( 1-(Aryl)-6-[alkoxyalkyl]-3-azabicyclo[3.1.0]hexanes and 6-(aryl)-6-[alkoxyalkyl]-3-azabicyclo[3.1.0]hexanes: a new series of potent and selective triple reuptake inhibitors.
Arban, R; Benedetti, R; Bertani, B; Bettati, M; Bettelini, L; Bonanomi, G; Braggio, S; Cavanni, P; Checchia, A; Davalli, S; Di Fabio, R; Fazzolari, E; Fontana, S; Marchioro, C; Micheli, F; Minick, D; Negri, M; Oliosi, B; Read, KD; Sartori, I; Tarsi, L; Tedesco, G; Terreni, S; Visentini, F; Zocchi, A; Zonzini, L, 2010
)
0.36
" Excellent bioavailability and brain penetration are associated with this series of 6-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-[(methyloxy)methyl]-3-azabicyclo[4."( 6-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-[(methyloxy)methyl]-3-azabicyclo[4.1.0]heptane: a new potent and selective triple reuptake inhibitor.
Andreotti, D; Arban, R; Benedetti, R; Bertani, B; Bettati, M; Bettelini, L; Bonanomi, G; Braggio, S; Carletti, R; Cavanni, P; Checchia, A; Corsi, M; Di Fabio, R; Fazzolari, E; Fontana, S; Marchioro, C; Merlo-Pich, E; Micheli, F; Negri, M; Oliosi, B; Ratti, E; Read, KD; Roscic, M; Sartori, I; Spada, S; Tarsi, L; Tedesco, G; Terreni, S; Visentini, F; Zocchi, A; Zonzini, L, 2010
)
0.36
"The aim of this study was to compare the bioavailability of orodispersible and conventional immediate-release (IR) escitalopram tablets."( The perception and pharmacokinetics of a 20-mg dose of escitalopram orodispersible tablets in a relative bioavailability study in healthy men.
Nilausen, DØ; van Gerven, J; Zuiker, RG, 2011
)
0.82
" However, few studies have assessed the bioavailability of pharmaceuticals to fish in natural waters."( Bioavailability of pharmaceuticals in waters close to wastewater treatment plants: use of fish bile for exposure assessment.
Brozinski, JM; Kronberg, L; Lahti, M; Oikari, A; Segner, H, 2012
)
0.38
"Decreasing the bioavailability of serotonin (5-HT) by inhibiting its biosynthesis may represent a useful adjunctive treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH)."( Inhibition of gut- and lung-derived serotonin attenuates pulmonary hypertension in mice.
Abid, S; Adnot, S; Amsellem, V; Chevarin, C; Dubois-Randé, JL; Gary-Bobo, G; Hamon, M; Houssaini, A; Marcos, E; Mouraret, N; Tissot, CM; Wan, F, 2012
)
0.38
" Functional polymorphisms of ABCB1 may influence central nervous system bioavailability of antidepressants subject to efflux."( ABCB1 polymorphism predicts escitalopram dose needed for remission in major depression.
Berk, M; Bousman, CA; Byron, K; Ng, CH; Singh, AB, 2012
)
0.67
"The inhibitory effects of escitalopram on erectile and vascular function were not accompanied by a change in endothelial nitric oxide synthase, neuronal nitric oxide synthase, inducible nitric oxide synthase expression, or endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity, suggesting that the inhibitory effect is caused by a decrease in nitric oxide bioavailability mediated by increased NADPH oxidase and reactive oxygen species production."( Chronic escitalopram treatment induces erectile dysfunction by decreasing nitric oxide bioavailability mediated by increased nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase activity and reactive oxygen species production.
Gokce, A; Hellstrom, WJ; Kadowitz, PJ; Kassan, M; Lasker, GF; Mandava, SH; Matrougui, K; Serefoglu, EC; Sikka, SC, 2013
)
1.09
" In contrast MAOi antidepressants, that also increase extracellular serotonin bioavailability have little or no effects on this condition."( Differential modulation of Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 channels by antidepressant drugs.
Beaulieu, JM; Chahine, M; Poulin, H; Thériault, O, 2015
)
0.42
" Several models for the absorption rate were explored (e."( A population PK model for citalopram and its major metabolite, N-desmethyl citalopram, in rats.
Bender, DM; Bies, RR; Eastwood, B; Jackson, K; Lowe, S; Swanson, S; Velez de Mendizabal, N, 2015
)
0.72
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
"This study compared the bioequivalence of two formulations of escitalopram oxalate 20 mg tablets in terms of bioavailability and tolerability in healthy Chinese male and female subjects."( Comparison of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence of Generic and Brand Name Formulations of Escitalopram Oxalate Tablets in Healthy Chinese Population Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.
Hu, W; Huo, H; Li, Q; Sui, Y; Tang, Y, 2020
)
1.02
" 1-H-benzotriazole, carbamazepine, citalopram, lamotrigine, sucralose, tramadol, and venlafaxine (>80 % frequency of appearance in effluents) were assessed with respect to their bioavailability in soil as part of different scenarios of irrigation with reclaimed water following a qualitative approach."( Multiclass target analysis of contaminants of emerging concern including transformation products, soil bioavailability assessment and retrospective screening as tools to evaluate risks associated with reclaimed water reuse.
Beretsou, VG; Fatta-Kassinos, D; Lundy, L; Manoli, K; Michael, C; Nika, MC; Revitt, DM; Sui, Q; Thomaidis, NS, 2022
)
1

Dosage Studied

Nondepressed outpatients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition PG received flexibly dosed escitalopram in a prospective, 10-week, open-label trial after a 2-week observation period. The ratio could be a valuable alternative to genotyping in personalized dosing of escitalsopram and other CYP2C19 substrates.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Dose-response effects of fluoxetine and desipramine on displacement of [3H]imipramine binding in forebrain regions indicate that the ligand labels predominantly high capacity, low affinity binding sites."( Autoradiographic characterization of [3H]imipramine and [3H]citalopram binding in rat and human brain: species differences and relationships to serotonin innervation patterns.
Breese, GR; Duncan, GE; Kaldas, RS; Kirkman, JA; Little, KY; Stumpf, WE, 1992
)
0.53
"The aim of the present study was to compare cardiovascular and/or cardiotoxic effects of eight anti-depressants (imipramine, chlorimipramine, amitriptyline, nortriptyline , doxepin, maprotiline, mianserin and citalopram) in anaesthetized cats after oral dosing and in conscious rabbits after intravenous infusion."( Comparative animal studies on cardiovascular toxicity of tri- and tetracyclic antidepressants and citalopram; relation to drug plasma levels.
Boeck, V; Fredricson Overø, K; Jørgensen, A, 1984
)
0.67
" In the present study we determined the time-course and dose-response effects of 6-MeO-THbetaC for blockade of AGS."( Effects of 6-methoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-beta-carboline (6-MeO-THbetaC) on audiogenic seizures in DBA/2J mice.
Buckholtz, NS; Sparks, DL, 1980
)
0.26
" In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study 22 patients with fibromyalgia were randomized to treatment with citalopram for 4 weeks at a dosage of 20 mg a day while 21 received placebo."( A randomized controlled trial of citalopram in the treatment of fibromyalgia.
Danneskiold-Samstøe, B; Nørregaard, J; Volkmann, H, 1995
)
0.78
" Metanalysis of the placebo controlled results with citalopram demonstrated that the dose-response curves based on log odds ratios showed a very flat curve across the 20-60 mg range and that 20 mg appeared therefore to be the minimum effective dose."( Selecting the optimum therapeutic dose of serotonin reuptake inhibitors: studies with citalopram.
Montgomery, SA, 1995
)
0.77
"Optimal dosing schedules for an antidepressant drug can only be established during clinical studies in depressed patients."( The optimal dosing regimen for citalopram--a meta-analysis of nine placebo-controlled studies.
Montgomery, SA; Pedersen, V; Rasmussen, C; Rioux, P; Tanghøj, P, 1994
)
0.57
" The time course and dose-response relationships for this effect were examined after treatment with two representative antidepressant drugs (imipramine and citalopram) and electriconvulsive shock (ECS)."( Adaptation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor complex following chronic antidepressant treatments.
Layer, RT; Nowak, G; Paul, IA; Popik, P; Skolnick, P, 1994
)
0.49
" Citalopram, as in a prior dose-response study, reduced REM sleep."( Sleep and EEG power spectrum effects of the 5-HT1A antagonist NAN-190 alone and in combination with citalopram.
Bjorvatn, B; Bjørkum, AA; Neckelmann, D; Ursin, R, 1996
)
1.42
" The dose-response curve was biphasic for citalopram with a maximum of 64% inhibition."( Behavioral profiles of SSRIs in animal models of depression, anxiety and aggression. Are they all alike?
Meier, E; Sánchez, C, 1997
)
0.56
" In the first set, the aim of the experiments was to investigate the dose-response effect of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram on rat exploratory behaviour in the elevated plus-maze."( The effects of cholecystokinin A and B receptor antagonists, devazepide and L 365260, on citalopram-induced decrease of exploratory behaviour in rat.
Allikmets, L; Harro, J; Matto, V, 1996
)
0.72
"Twelve subjects received a single 25 mg dose of racemic warfarin either alone or on Day 15 of a 21-day oral dosing regimen of 40 mg citalopram daily."( Investigation of multiple dose citalopram on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of racemic warfarin.
Davis, JD; Khan, AZ; Larsen, F; Priskorn, M; Rolan, PE; Sidhu, JS, 1997
)
0.79
" Ratings were completed every 2 weeks for 12 weeks, during which time dosage was increased to a maximum of 60 mg daily (mean dose 36."( Use of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram in treatment of trichotillomania.
Bouwer, C; Maud, CM; Stein, DJ, 1997
)
0.55
" Enantiomeric (S/R) serum concentration ratios for citalopram were always less than unity and were constant during the steady-state dosing interval."( Steady-state pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of citalopram and its metabolites in humans.
Grollier, G; Larsen, F; Poulsen, M; Priskorn, M; Segonzac, A; Sidhu, J, 1997
)
0.8
"No reduction of citalopram dosage is warranted in patients with moderately impaired renal function."( Single-dose pharmacokinetics of citalopram in patients with moderate renal insufficiency or hepatic cirrhosis compared with healthy subjects.
Aaes-Jørgensen, T; Joffe, P; Larsen, FS; Pedersen, V; Ring-Larsen, H; Sidhu, J, 1998
)
0.93
" One group (N = 17 completers) was administered citalopram continuously at a constant dosage (20+/-10 mg/day) throughout the menstrual cycle."( Citalopram in premenstrual dysphoria: is intermittent treatment during luteal phases more effective than continuous medication throughout the menstrual cycle?
Andersch, B; Bengtsson, F; Dagnell, I; Eriksson, E; Sundblad, C; Wikander, I; Zylberstein, D, 1998
)
2
"Patients in this double-blind, parallel-group trial were assigned to 1 of 3 fixed dosage ranges of citalopram (10 or 15 mg/day, 20 or 30 mg/day, or 40 or 60 mg/day), 1 dosage range of clomipramine (60 or 90 mg/day), or placebo."( A controlled, prospective, 1-year trial of citalopram in the treatment of panic disorder.
Frazer, J; Koponen, HJ; Lehto, HJ; Leinonen, EV; Lepola, UM; Pedersen, T; Penttinen, JT; Sjödin, I; Wade, AG, 1998
)
0.78
" Analysis of the difference in the number of patients in different treatment groups remaining in the study (perhaps the best measure of long-term efficacy) also demonstrated that the patients treated with citalopram in dosage ranges of 20 or 30 mg/day and 40 or 60 mg/day had better response than placebo-treated patients (p < ."( A controlled, prospective, 1-year trial of citalopram in the treatment of panic disorder.
Frazer, J; Koponen, HJ; Lehto, HJ; Leinonen, EV; Lepola, UM; Pedersen, T; Penttinen, JT; Sjödin, I; Wade, AG, 1998
)
0.75
"Citalopram in the dosage range of 20 to 60 mg/day is effective, well tolerated, and safe in the long-term treatment of patients who have panic disorder."( A controlled, prospective, 1-year trial of citalopram in the treatment of panic disorder.
Frazer, J; Koponen, HJ; Lehto, HJ; Leinonen, EV; Lepola, UM; Pedersen, T; Penttinen, JT; Sjödin, I; Wade, AG, 1998
)
2.01
" In Experiment I, rats were treated with MDMA using several dosing protocols (2."( (+) 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ('ecstasy') transiently increases striatal 5-HT1B binding sites without altering 5-HT1B mRNA in rat brain.
McEvoy, C; Neumaier, JF; Sexton, TJ, 1999
)
0.3
" In summary, the drug components after chronic dosing correlated well between the periphery and the brain, but not with the brain monoamine concentrations."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses to chronic administration of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram in rats.
Ahlner, J; Apelqvist, G; Bengtsson, F; Bergqvist, PB; Carlsson, B; Hjorth, S; Kugelberg, FC; Wikell, C,
)
0.34
"Citalopram dosing to steady state did not inhibit or induce the metabolism of theophylline in this population of healthy volunteers."( Effect of citalopram on plasma levels of oral theophylline.
Larsen, F; Møller, SE; Pitsiu, M; Rolan, PE, 2000
)
2.15
"Citalopram tablets fulfill most dosing needs in the treatment of depression, but some patients may have difficulty swallowing tablets and thus may be less likely to comply with their medication regimen."( Pharmacokinetic comparison of oral solution and tablet formulations of citalopram: a single-dose, randomized, crossover study.
Abramowitz, W; Gutierrez, MM, 2000
)
1.98
" Furthermore, no adjustment of citalopram dosage should be necessary in most patients who receive the drug in combination with a CYP3A4 inhibitor."( Lack of effect of a single dose of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of citalopram.
Abramowitz, W; Gutierrez, M, 2001
)
0.83
" Citalopram was started in a daily dosage of 20 mg that was kept unchanged for 6 weeks."( Citalopram in mentally retarded patients with depression: a long-term clinical investigation.
Jacobs, GA; Tuinier, S; van den Berg, YW; Veendrik-Meekes, MJ; Verhoeven, WM, 2001
)
2.66
" Since the flexible dosing started after Week 4, analysis of 4-week data ensured that the patients received fixed doses of 10 mg/day escitalopram (155 patients), 20 mg/day citalopram (160 patients), or placebo (154 patients)."( Escitalopram (S-enantiomer of citalopram): clinical efficacy and onset of action predicted from a rat model.
Loft, H; Montgomery, SA; Papp, M; Reines, EH; Sánchez, C, 2001
)
1.24
" However, patients may require dosage adjustment for tolerability of this combination."( Methylphenidate augmentation of citalopram in elderly depressed patients.
Kumar, A; Lavretsky, H, 2001
)
0.59
"Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are commonly used to treat major depression; however, the percentage of serotonin (5-HT) transporter (5-HTT) sites occupied during clinical dosing is unknown."( Occupancy of serotonin transporters by paroxetine and citalopram during treatment of depression: a [(11)C]DASB PET imaging study.
Ginovart, N; Goulding, V; Hood, K; Houle, S; Hussey, D; Meyer, JH; Wilson, AA, 2001
)
0.56
" Thirty men with an intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) less than 1 minute were randomly assigned to receive paroxetine (20 mg/day) and citalopram (20 mg/day) for 5 weeks, after taking half the dosage in the first week."( SSRIs and ejaculation: a double-blind, randomized, fixed-dose study with paroxetine and citalopram.
Olivier, B; Waldinger, MD; Zwinderman, AH, 2001
)
0.73
" Dosage adjustments were made as the physicians deemed clinically necessary."( An open-label trial of citalopram for major depression in patients with hepatitis C.
Gleason, OC; Isbell, MD; Philipsen, MA; Yates, WR, 2002
)
0.63
" This raises the important question of whether once-weekly enteric-coated fluoxetine, 90 mg, is effective for maintenance of response in patients whose depressive symptoms have responded to daily dosing with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as citalopram, paroxetine, or sertraline."( Switching patients from daily citalopram, paroxetine, or sertraline to once-weekly fluoxetine in the maintenance of response for depression.
Brown, EB; Gonzales, JS; Miner, CM; Munir, R, 2002
)
0.78
" A 58-year-old man experienced priapism several hours after inadvertently taking three tablets of citalopram 20 mg, which he had mistaken for aspirin, in addition to his usual dosage of 20 mg twice/day."( Citalopram-induced priapism.
Brown, WC; Dent, LA; Murney, JD, 2002
)
1.97
" Dosage was regulated individually over a period of 4 weeks."( Citalopram treatment for impulsive aggression in children and adolescents: an open pilot study.
Armenteros, JL; Lewis, JE, 2002
)
1.76
" A placebo-controlled study of citalopram, the most selective SSRI, demonstrated that half-cycle dosing (luteal phase) was effective for DSM-IV-defined premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), a severe form of PMS."( Citalopram in PMS patients with prior SSRI treatment failure: a preliminary study.
Auletto, R; Freeman, EW; Jabara, S; Sondheimer, SJ, 2002
)
2.04
"001) in both half-cycle and full-cycle dosing groups."( Citalopram in PMS patients with prior SSRI treatment failure: a preliminary study.
Auletto, R; Freeman, EW; Jabara, S; Sondheimer, SJ, 2002
)
1.76
"Among the many problems in interpreting dose-response studies with antidepressants are the psychometric problems in the identification of true antidepressive effect versus true adverse drug effect."( Citalopram dose-response revisited using an alternative psychometric approach to evaluate clinical effects of four fixed citalopram doses compared to placebo in patients with major depression.
Andersen, HF; Bech, P; Overø, K; Tanghøj, P, 2002
)
1.76
"This study is a re-examination of a dose-response trial with citalopram in order to examine the explanatory ability of using strict psychometric dimensions to measure the wanted and unwanted drug effects of different doses compared to placebo."( Citalopram dose-response revisited using an alternative psychometric approach to evaluate clinical effects of four fixed citalopram doses compared to placebo in patients with major depression.
Andersen, HF; Bech, P; Overø, K; Tanghøj, P, 2002
)
2
"This psychometric re-examination of a citalopram dose-response trial has shown that the pure antidepressive or antianxiety effects can be observed after 6 weeks of therapy even in a dose of 10 mg daily."( Citalopram dose-response revisited using an alternative psychometric approach to evaluate clinical effects of four fixed citalopram doses compared to placebo in patients with major depression.
Andersen, HF; Bech, P; Overø, K; Tanghøj, P, 2002
)
2.03
"An 87-year-old Filipino man was admitted to the hospital reporting malaise, confusion, dizziness, and falls approximately 3 weeks following an increase in his citalopram dosage from 10 to 20 mg/d."( Citalopram-associated SIADH.
Barclay, TS; Lee, AJ, 2002
)
1.95
" Citalopram dosing began at 20 mg/day and could be titrated to 60 mg/day."( Naturalistic study of the early psychiatric use of citalopram in the United States.
Bose, A; Heydorn, WE; Rush, AJ, 2002
)
1.48
" A comparison of citalopram and fluoxetine pharmacokinetics in the same animal and at the same dosage (1 mg/kg) showed that citalopram SERT occupancy and plasma half-lives were 9 times and 14 times shorter, respectively, than those of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine."( [11C]-DASB, a tool for in vivo measurement of SSRI-induced occupancy of the serotonin transporter: PET characterization and evaluation in cats.
Ginovart, N; Houle, S; Hussey, D; Meyer, JH; Wilson, AA, 2003
)
0.66
"30) with coexisting obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and depression were treated for 6 weeks with citalopram (10-60 mg; mean dosage after 6 weeks--25."( [Clinical efficacy of citalopram in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder].
Jakitowicz, J; Nowicki, Z; Wiśniewski, G,
)
0.66
" In conclusion, the CIT enantiomers were shown for the first time to be stereoselectively metabolized after single-dose administration to rats, as previously shown in steady-state dosing studies in humans and rats."( Stereoselective single-dose kinetics of citalopram and its metabolites in rats.
Ahlner, J; Bengtsson, F; Carlsson, B; Kugelberg, FC, 2003
)
0.59
"The AUC of S-, but not R-(CT) was found to be significantly higher in PM of mephenytoin compared to EMs, PMs may need a lower dosage of CT."( Metabolism of citalopram enantiomers in CYP2C19/CYP2D6 phenotyped panels of healthy Swedes.
Bertilsson, L; Gustafsson, LL; Herrlin, K; Tybring, G; Widén, J; Yasui-Furukori, N, 2003
)
0.68
" In the present study we report, for the first time, on an interaction between R-citalopram and escitalopram after repeated dosing in a rat chronic mild stress (CMS) model of depression."( R-citalopram counteracts the antidepressant-like effect of escitalopram in a rat chronic mild stress model.
Gruca, P; Papp, M; Sánchez, C, 2003
)
1.27
"The present study was conducted to investigate whether a single oral dosage of 20 mg of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram could be used as a tool to stimulate hormone secretion in neuroendocrine challenge paradigms."( Oral application of citalopram (20 mg) and its usefulness for neuroendocrine challenge tests.
Henning, J; Netter, P, 2002
)
0.84
" Citalopram was started at a dosage of 20 mg/day; the dosage was increased to a maximum of 60 mg/day by the third week, on the basis of clinical need and tolerability."( Citalopram concentrations and response in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Preliminary results.
Bareggi, SR; Bellodi, L; Bianchi, L; Cavallaro, R; Gervasoni, M; Siliprandi, F, 2004
)
2.68
" In addition, a dose-response relationship could be seen for escitalopram and citalopram with increasing 5-HT transport inhibition observed with increasing dose."( Improved potency of escitalopram on the human serotonin transporter: demonstration of an ex vivo assay technique.
Corley, KM; Hobby, HM; Rausch, JL, 2004
)
0.88
" Outpatients (18 years or older) who met DSM-IV criteria for GAD, with baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAMA) scores > or = 18, were randomly assigned to double blind treatment with escitalopram (10 mg/day for the first 4 weeks and then flexibly dosed from 10-20 mg/day) or placebo for 8 weeks, following a 1-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period."( Escitalopram in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: double-blind, placebo controlled, flexible-dose study.
Bose, A; Davidson, JR; Korotzer, A; Zheng, H, 2004
)
1.23
" Multiple SSRI dosing ranges were evaluated in autistic patients of different ages with various functional impairments."( Treating functional impairment of autism with selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors.
Eichner, SF; Jones, JR; Moore, ML, 2004
)
0.32
" The dosing is convenient, and the drug is safe and well tolerated due to a mild profile of side-effects and favorable pharmacokinetic properties."( [Escitalopram--second generation of serotonin transporter inhibitors?].
Borkowska, AB; Rybakowski, J,
)
0.75
"In continuation of a previous psychometric analysis of dose-response data for citalopram in depression, the corresponding study data for escitalopram is of interest, since escitalopram is the active enantiomer of citalopram and because citalopram was used as the active control."( Escitalopram dose-response revisited: an alternative psychometric approach to evaluate clinical effects of escitalopram compared to citalopram and placebo in patients with major depression.
Andersen, HF; Bech, P; Cialdella, P; Pedersen, AG; Tanghøj, P, 2004
)
1.27
" Two weeks after the increase of the dosage of sertraline, the patient developed a full-blown SS, which resolved completely after the discontinuation of the drug."( Repetition of serotonin syndrome after reexposure to SSRI--a case report.
Modestin, J; Tomaselli, G, 2004
)
0.32
"A rat model was used to study if postmortem redistribution of the S- and R-enantiomers of citalopram (CIT) and its metabolites demethylcitalopram (DCIT) and didemethylcitalopram (DDCIT) occurs after three different subcutaneous dosing procedures with racemic CIT."( Postmortem redistribution of the enantiomers of citalopram and its metabolites: an experimental study in rats.
Ahlner, J; Bengtsson, F; Carlsson, B; Druid, H; Kugelberg, FC,
)
0.61
" Initially, dose-response experiments were performed with intrahippocampal perfusions of GBR-12909 and citalopram, respectively, selective dopamine and serotonin re-uptake blockers."( Anticonvulsant action of GBR-12909 and citalopram against acute experimentally induced limbic seizures.
Clinckers, R; Ebinger, G; Meurs, A; Michotte, Y; Smolders, I, 2004
)
0.81
" The immediate and early effect of SSRI use on platelets might be an increase be an in tendency for thrombosis, whereas the late effect after repeated dosing might be an increase in tendency to bleed, as suggested by previous literature."( Venous thromboembolism and escitalopram.
Anil Yağcioğlu, AE; Ertugrul, A; Kurne, A; Yazici, KM,
)
0.42
" This is especially important, however, for a drug that is pivotal to a patient's well-being; its therapeutic effect should be carefully monitored when any new drug is added or a change in the dosage of a concurrent drug is made."( Exacerbation of panic disorder with rifampin therapy in a patient receiving citalopram.
Argo, TR; Carnahan, RM; Kukoyi, O, 2005
)
0.56
"Twenty-seven women meeting DSM-IV criteria for PMDD were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to luteal phase (N = 13) or symptom-onset (N = 14) dosing of escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) for 3 consecutive menstrual cycles."( A preliminary study of luteal phase versus symptom-onset dosing with escitalopram for premenstrual dysphoric disorder.
Ferdousi, T; Freeman, EW; Lin, H; Sammel, MD; Sondheimer, SJ, 2005
)
0.76
"Premenstrual dysphoric disorder improved significantly with either luteal phase or symptom-onset dosing of escitalopram."( A preliminary study of luteal phase versus symptom-onset dosing with escitalopram for premenstrual dysphoric disorder.
Ferdousi, T; Freeman, EW; Lin, H; Sammel, MD; Sondheimer, SJ, 2005
)
0.77
" Each subject was scanned twice: with and without pre-treatment with the SSRI citalopram in various dosage regimens."( Measuring SSRI occupancy of SERT using the novel tracer [123I]ADAM: a SPECT validation study.
Ell, PJ; Erlandsson, K; Lucas, R; Lui, D; Mu, S; Sivananthan, T; Spezzi, A; Townsend, CE; Warrington, S, 2005
)
0.56
" Following recovery, the animals were orally dosed at light onset with either desipramine (20 mg/kg), fluoxetine (10 mg/kg), citalopram (10 or 40 mg/kg) or vehicle in a cross-over design."( Antidepressants and REM sleep in Wistar-Kyoto and Sprague-Dawley rats.
Hutson, PH; Ivarsson, M; Paterson, LM, 2005
)
0.53
" The clinical investigator graded the veracity of the patients' dosing history on a 5-point ordinal scale."( The population pharmacokinetics of citalopram after deliberate self-poisoning: a Bayesian approach.
Duffull, SB; Friberg, LE; Hackett, LP; Isbister, GK, 2005
)
0.61
" Escitalopram was prescribed in a dosage of 10 mg/day for 2-months."( [Depressive disorders in panic attack patients and their correction with escitalopram].
Cherednichenko, NV; Levada, OA,
)
0.98
" Here, we compare the efficacy and safety of citalopram, with its S-enantiomer escitalopram at half dosage as to citalopram, in elderly patients who have panic attacks."( New possibilities of treatment for panic attacks in elderly patients: escitalopram versus citalopram.
Alvano, A; Malaguarnera, M; Raffaele, R; Rampello, L; Vecchio, I, 2006
)
0.83
"Patients (6-17 years old) with major depressive disorder were randomized to receive 8 weeks of double-blind flexibly dosed treatment with escitalopram (10-20 mg/day; n = 131) or placebo (n = 133)."( A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of escitalopram in the treatment of pediatric depression.
Findling, RL; Jonas, J; Saikali, K; Ventura, D; Wagner, KD, 2006
)
0.78
"The objective of this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority and safety of the hypericum extract STW3-VI in a once-daily dosage regime in the treatment of moderate depression."( Comparative efficacy and safety of a once-daily dosage of hypericum extract STW3-VI and citalopram in patients with moderate depression: a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled study.
Gastpar, M; Singer, A; Zeller, K, 2006
)
0.56
"To determine if voluntary prescription change forms for antidepressant drugs could induce dosing changes and reduce the cost of antidepressant therapy in a Medicaid population."( Initial results of the use of prescription order change forms to achieve dose form optimization (consolidation and tablet splitting) of SSRI antidepressants in a state Medicaid program.
Hamer, AM; Hartung, DM; Haxby, DG; Ketchum, KL; Pollack, DA,
)
0.13
"The present study has addressed the question of what is more important for the occurrence of adaptive changes observed in the organism treated with antidepressant drugs: a daily dosing of the drug or the period of time necessary for the plastic events to develop."( Delayed effects of antidepressant drugs in rats.
Dziedzicka-Wasylewska, M; Faron-Górecka, A; Kuśmider, M, 2006
)
0.33
" Results reveal a clear dose-response relationship in both sexes."( S-Citalopram in neuroendocrine challenge-tests: serotonergic responsivity in healthy male and female human participants.
Bausch, S; Hennig, J; Iffland, J; Kuepper, Y; Reuter, M, 2006
)
1.06
" Potential predictors examined were type of disorder, location of study, dosing regimen, number of treatment arms, gender of patients, and duration and severity of disorder."( Which factors predict placebo response in anxiety disorders and major depression? An analysis of placebo-controlled studies of escitalopram.
Baldwin, DS; Bandelow, B; Despiegel, N; Dolberg, OT; Stein, DJ, 2006
)
0.54
" The dosage was reduced and yawning disappeared some hours later."( Do your patients suffer from excessive yawning?
Gutiérrez-Alvarez, AM, 2007
)
0.34
" dosing of a novel MCHR1 antagonist, N-[3-(1-{[4-(3,4-difluorophenoxy)-phenyl]methyl}(4-piperidyl))-4-methylphenyl]-2-methylpropanamide (SNAP 94847), in three mouse models predictive of antidepressant/anxiolytic-like activity: novelty suppressed feeding (NSF) in 129S6/SvEvTac mice and light/dark paradigm (L/D) and forced swim test (FST) in BALB/cJ mice."( Efficacy of the MCHR1 antagonist N-[3-(1-{[4-(3,4-difluorophenoxy)phenyl]methyl}(4-piperidyl))-4-methylphenyl]-2-methylpropanamide (SNAP 94847) in mouse models of anxiety and depression following acute and chronic administration is independent of hippocam
Craig, DA; David, DJ; Dong, D; Gerald, CP; Hegde, LG; Hen, R; Holick, KA; Klemenhagen, KC; Marzabadi, MR; Mendez, I; Ping, XI; Santarelli, L; Saxe, MD; Swanson, CJ; Zhong, H, 2007
)
0.34
" The treatment was conducted as a monotherapy during 6 weeks, with citalopram dosage of 20 mg/day."( [An electrophysiological study of the rehabilitation of cognitive functions during the treatment of patients with panic disorders].
Golubev, VL; Gordeev, SA; Posokhov, SI; Riabokon', IV; Tabeeva, GR; Veĭn, AM, 2006
)
0.57
"This trial was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed dose of escitalopram 10 mg/day with sertraline optimally dosed within its recommended dose range (50-200 mg/day) for the treatment of major depressive disorder."( Escitalopram versus sertraline in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a randomized clinical trial.
Armstrong, EP; Haim Erder, M; Skrepnek, GH; Ventura, D, 2007
)
1.28
" At week 8, the mean sertraline dosage was 144 mg/day (median = 150 mg/day)."( Escitalopram versus sertraline in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a randomized clinical trial.
Armstrong, EP; Haim Erder, M; Skrepnek, GH; Ventura, D, 2007
)
1.06
"No differences in efficacy were observed for fixed-dose escitalopram 10 mg/day and sertraline flexibly dosed from 50-200 mg/day."( Escitalopram versus sertraline in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a randomized clinical trial.
Armstrong, EP; Haim Erder, M; Skrepnek, GH; Ventura, D, 2007
)
1.31
" Patients were treated with open-label escitalopram at a dosage of 10 to 20 mg per day."( Escitalopram in seasonal affective disorder: results of an open trial.
Kasper, S; Pjrek, E; Praschak-Rieder, N; Stastny, J; Willeit, M; Winkler, D, 2007
)
1.33
" Adolescents, elderly individuals and patients with hepatic impairment do not have clinically relevant differences in pharmacokinetics compared with healthy young adults, implying that adjustment of the dosage is not necessary in these patient groups."( The clinical pharmacokinetics of escitalopram.
Rao, N, 2007
)
0.62
" The dosage was increased to 10 mg daily two weeks later."( Potential aripiprazole-mediated extrapyramidal symptoms in an adult with developmental disabilities.
Brahm, NC; Brown, RC; McElwain, DL, 2007
)
0.34
" Depending on the intended indication and dosing regimen, PPL can delay or stop development of a compound in the drug discovery process."( Evaluation of a published in silico model and construction of a novel Bayesian model for predicting phospholipidosis inducing potential.
Gehlhaar, D; Greene, N; Johnson, TO; Pelletier, DJ; Tilloy-Ellul, A,
)
0.13
"The efficacy and tolerability of symptom-onset dosing with citalopram in the treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) was evaluated in an open trial."( Symptom-onset dosing with citalopram in the treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD): a case series.
Ravindran, AV; Ravindran, LN; Steiner, M; Woods, SA, 2007
)
0.88
" CD1 mice were dosed either acutely or chronically with either antidepressants or 5-HT receptor subtype selective antagonists."( Hippocampal Bcl-2 expression is selectively increased following chronic but not acute treatment with antidepressants, 5-HT(1A) or 5-HT(2C/2B) receptor antagonists.
Hutson, PH; Murray, F, 2007
)
0.34
" Dosage adjustments were made within 2 weeks, depending on the tolerability of the patient."( Obsessive-compulsive disorder: an open-label pilot trial of escitalopram.
da Silva Prado, H; de Oliveira, IR; Galvão-de Almeida, A; Góis, CR; Leckman, JF; Miranda-Scippa, AM; Quarantini, LC; Rosário, MC; Santos-Jesus, R, 2007
)
0.58
"56)% were shown after administration of citalopram in a dosage of 4 mg x kg."( Imaging the availability of serotonin transporter in rat brain with 123I-ADAM and small-animal SPECT.
Chang, CJ; Chen, CC; Hwang, LC; Jan, ML; Kao, HC; Lee, SY; Liu, HH, 2007
)
0.61
" The model may be applied for preclinical evaluations or predictions of escitalopram concentration-time courses in plasma as well as at the target site in the CNS for various dosing scenarios."( Pharmacokinetic modelling of blood-brain barrier transport of escitalopram in rats.
Bundgaard, C; Jørgensen, M; Larsen, F, 2007
)
0.81
"Nondepressed outpatients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition PG received flexibly dosed escitalopram in a prospective, 10-week, open-label trial after a 2-week observation period."( An open-label trial of escitalopram in the treatment of pathological gambling.
Allen, J; Black, DW; Forbush, KT; Shaw, M,
)
0.64
" The results are discussed in the light of dosage issues and subtypes of serotonergic receptors."( Divergent effects of increased serotonergic activity on psychophysiological parameters of human attention.
Glenthøj, BY; Jensen, K; Oranje, B; Wienberg, M, 2008
)
0.35
" Participants received flexible doses of citalopram for up to 14 weeks, with dosage adjustments based on routine clinical assessments."( Ethnicity/race and outcome in the treatment of depression: results from STAR*D.
Alpert, JE; Castro, DB; Gaynes, BN; Gonzalez, J; Lesser, IM; Luther, JF; Rush, AJ; Trivedi, M; Wisniewski, SR, 2007
)
0.61
"Simple, accurate, precise, and sensitive ultraviolet spectrophotometric and reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC) methods for simultaneous estimation of escitalopram oxalate (ESC) and clonazepam (CLO) in combined tablet dosage form have been developed and validated."( Spectrophotometric and reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic methods for simultaneous determination of escitalopram oxalate and clonazepam in combined tablet dosage form.
Dhavale, ND; Gandhi, SV; Jadhav, VY; Sabnis, SS,
)
0.53
" Participants were adult outpatients who, following 8 weeks of monotherapy with an adequate dosing regimen of an SSRI other than citalopram and had not responded, met the diagnostic criteria for depression as described in the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, and had a score > or =20 on the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D21)."( Venlafaxine extended release versus citalopram in patients with depression unresponsive to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
Jiang, Q; Lenox-Smith, AJ, 2008
)
0.83
"Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were found to be effective in treating premenstrual symptoms, with continuous dosing regimens favored for effectiveness."( Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder: a meta-analysis.
Aperi, J; Borenstein, J; Jones, JB; Karne, A; Shah, NR; Shemtov, R, 2008
)
0.35
"Despite the typically chronic course of OCD, many patients with OCD responded to the Esciatolpram at the dosage of twenty milligram per day."( Escitalopram in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double blind placebo control trial.
Ahmad, S; Hotiana, UA; Khan, MN,
)
0.85
" Participants received citalopram for up to 14 weeks, with dosage adjustments based on routine clinical assessments."( Depression outcomes of Spanish- and english-speaking Hispanic outpatients in STAR*D.
Alpert, J; Cook, I; Epstein, M; Flores, D; Gonzalez, C; Lesser, I; Luther, J; Rosales, A; Rush, AJ; Sciolla, A; Trivedi, M; Wisniewski, S; Zisook, S, 2008
)
0.66
" The clinical assessment was carried out at baseline (t0) and at the 4th (t1), 12th (t2), 24th (t3), 36th (t4), and 48th (t5) week by means of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Clinical Global Impression scale, and the Dosage Record and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale."( Effectiveness of long-term augmentation with citalopram to clomipramine in treatment-resistant OCD patients.
Carlini, M; Catena Dell'osso, M; Consoli, G; Golia, F; Marazziti, D; Mungai, F; Pfanner, C; Presta, S, 2008
)
0.61
" Escitalopram and aripiprazole were flexibly dosed for 7 weeks, with maximum dosages of 20 and 30 mg/d, respectively."( An open study of aripiprazole and escitalopram for psychotic major depressive disorder.
Denninger, JW; Dording, C; Fava, M; Hilliker, S; Homberger, C; Matthews, JD; Park, L; Rooney, K; Siefert, C; Sklarsky, K; van Nieuwenhuizen, AO, 2009
)
1.25
"The objective of this study was to compare population pharmacokinetic models of escitalopram developed from dosage times recorded by a medication event monitoring system (MEMS) versus the reported times from patients with diagnosed depression."( The effect of reporting methods for dosing times on the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters of escitalopram.
Bies, RR; Fagiolini, A; Feng, Y; Florian, J; Frank, E; Gastonguay, MR; Jin, Y; Kepple, G; Kirshner, M; Kupfer, DJ; Pollock, BG, 2009
)
0.79
"In a multicentre part-randomised open-label design (the Genome Based Therapeutic Drugs for Depression (GENDEP) study) 811 adults with moderate to severe unipolar depression were allocated to flexible dosage escitalopram or nortriptyline for 12 weeks."( Differential efficacy of escitalopram and nortriptyline on dimensional measures of depression.
Aitchison, KJ; Barreto, M; Dmitrzak-Weglarz, M; Elkin, A; Farmer, A; Giovannini, C; Hauser, J; Henigsberg, N; Jorgensen, L; Kalember, P; Landau, S; Maier, W; Marusic, A; McGuffin, P; Mors, O; Petrovic, A; Placentino, A; Rietschel, M; Schmael, C; Souery, D; Uher, R; Zobel, A, 2009
)
0.84
" A selective serotonergic drug (citalopram) or a placebo was administered using a mean dosage of 10 mg/day in combination with physiotherapy."( A double blind placebo RCT to investigate the effects of serotonergic modulation on brain excitability and motor recovery in stroke patients.
Acler, M; Fiaschi, A; Manganotti, P; Robol, E, 2009
)
0.64
" Despite similar medication dosing and time at exit dose, the efficacy participants tolerated citalopram better."( Can phase III trial results of antidepressant medications be generalized to clinical practice? A STAR*D report.
Fava, M; Gaynes, BN; Lavori, PW; Luther, JF; McGrath, PJ; Nierenberg, AA; Rush, AJ; Thase, ME; Trivedi, MH; Warden, D; Wisniewski, SR, 2009
)
0.57
" A pooled analysis suggests that build-up of the R-enantiomer after repeated citalopram dosing may lead to increased inhibition of S-enantiomer occupancy of SERT."( Differences in the dynamics of serotonin reuptake transporter occupancy may explain superior clinical efficacy of escitalopram versus citalopram.
Asenbaum, S; Attarbaschi-Steiner, T; Dudczak, R; Holik, A; Kasper, S; Klein, N; Lanzenberger, R; Mossaheb, N; Sacher, J; Spindelegger, C, 2009
)
0.79
"Citalopram was delivered using measurement-based care and flexible dosing with the aim of achieving symptom remission."( Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics associated with worsened depression during treatment with citalopram: results of the NIMH STAR(*)D trial.
Balasubramani, GK; Fava, M; Friedman, ES; Gilmer, W; Nierenberg, AA; Rush, AJ; Trivedi, MH; Wisniewski, SR; Zisook, S, 2009
)
2.01
" The mean (SD) maximum dosage of citalopram hydrobromide was 16."( Lack of efficacy of citalopram in children with autism spectrum disorders and high levels of repetitive behavior: citalopram ineffective in children with autism.
Anagnostou, E; Bregman, JD; Donnelly, CL; Dukes, K; Hirtz, D; Hollander, E; King, BH; McCracken, JT; Ritz, L; Scahill, L; Sikich, L; Sullivan, L; Wagner, A, 2009
)
0.96
"To report the successful use of high dose insulin (HDI) in previously unreported insulin dosing ranges in a patient with severe myocardial toxicity due to an amitriptyline and citalopram overdose."( High dose insulin in toxic cardiogenic shock.
Engebretsen, KM; Holger, JS; Marini, JJ, 2009
)
0.55
" A total of 796 adult patients with major depressive disorder who were treated with a flexible dosage of escitalopram or nortriptyline in Genome-based Therapeutic Drugs for Depression (GENDEP) were included in the sample and provided data on suicidal ideation."( Genetic predictors of increase in suicidal ideation during antidepressant treatment in the GENDEP project.
Aitchison, KJ; Bonvicini, C; Craig, I; Farmer, AE; Gray, J; Gupta, B; Hauser, J; Henigsberg, N; Huezo-Diaz, P; Jorgensen, L; Kalember, P; Kapelski, P; Lewis, CM; Maier, W; Marusic, A; McGuffin, P; Mors, O; Perroud, N; Petrovic, A; Placentino, A; Rietschel, M; Schulze, TG; Smith, R; Souery, D; Uher, R; Zobel, A, 2009
)
0.57
" Phase 1 was a 6-week lead-in with open-label sertraline flexibly dosed to 100 mg (or escitalopram equivalent) to prospectively define treatment refractoriness (lack of remission)."( Next-step strategies for panic disorder refractory to initial pharmacotherapy: a 3-phase randomized clinical trial.
Hoge, EA; Lebeau, RT; Moshier, SJ; Otto, MW; Pollack, MH; Simon, NM; Thompson, EH; Worthington, JJ; Zalta, AK, 2009
)
0.58
"In a multicentre part-randomised open-label study, 811 adult patients with moderate to severe unipolar depression were allocated to flexible dosage of escitalopram or nortriptyline for 12 weeks."( Suicidal ideation during treatment of depression with escitalopram and nortriptyline in genome-based therapeutic drugs for depression (GENDEP): a clinical trial.
Aitchison, KJ; Campbell, D; Elkin, A; Farmer, AE; Giovannini, C; Gray, J; Gunasinghe, C; Gupta, B; Hauser, J; Henigsberg, N; Jorgensen, L; Maier, W; Marusic, A; McGuffin, P; Mors, O; Perroud, N; Placentino, A; Rietschel, M; Souery, D; Strohmaier, J; Szczepankiewicz, A; Uher, R; Zobel, A, 2009
)
0.8
"0 mg/kg) attenuated the priming effects of cocaine, shifting the cocaine dose-response function rightward and downward."( Attenuation of cocaine-induced reinstatement of drug seeking in squirrel monkeys: kappa opioid and serotonergic mechanisms.
Platt, DM; Rowlett, JK; Rüedi-Bettschen, D; Spealman, RD, 2010
)
0.36
"It is important that variations in drug metabolism during pregnancy be considered as these changes may necessitate a dosage adjustment to ensure that therapeutic failure does not occur during pregnancy."( Changes in antidepressant metabolism in pregnancy evidenced by metabolic ratios in hair: a novel approach.
Baumer, C; Koren, G; O'Brien, L; Sachs, H; Thieme, D, 2010
)
0.36
" Citalopram alone produced predominantly saline-appropriate responding, but when administered before cocaine, citalopram dose-dependently shifted the cocaine dose-response curve leftward."( Citalopram enhances cocaine's subjective effects in rats.
Hiranita, T; Katz, JL; Soto, PL, 2009
)
2.71
"Our results suggest that the genetic polymorphisms in CYP2C19 may be influencing S-CIT serum concentrations, and that specific CYP2D6 polymorphisms may be predicting patient treatment outcomes based on gene dosage analyses."( Genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 enzymes influence metabolism of the antidepressant escitalopram and treatment response.
Chen, CY; Fang, CK; Hsiao, MC; Lin, KM; Liu, SC; Liu, YL; Lu, ML; Lu, SC; Shen, WW; Tang, HS; Tsai, MH; Wu, CS, 2010
)
0.58
" Treatment dropout was defined as missing seven consecutive buprenorphine dosing days."( Antidepressant treatment does not improve buprenorphine retention among opioid-dependent persons.
Anderson, BJ; Cioe, PA; Friedmann, PD; Herman, DS; Kettavong, M; Stein, MD; Tellioglu, T, 2010
)
0.36
" Patients randomly received flexible dosing of citalopram or placebo augmentation of their antipsychotic medication."( Treatment of subsyndromal depressive symptoms in middle-age and older patients with schizophrenia: effect of age on response.
Fellows, I; Golshan, S; Kasckow, J; Meeks, T; Solorzano, E; Zisook, S, 2010
)
0.62
"we related medication choice and dosage range to outcomes of treatment as reflected by discharge rates and suicidality."( Was Cipriani right? Audits to compare discharge rates and suicidality between antidepressant monotherapies used in a British community mental health team.
Agius, M; Gardner, J; Liu, K; Zaman, R, 2010
)
0.36
" Regarding Dose Ranges, we note that wheras many patients had their dosage titrated upwards from the starting dose, most did not have the dosage titrated to the highest dose of the relevant medication."( Was Cipriani right? Audits to compare discharge rates and suicidality between antidepressant monotherapies used in a British community mental health team.
Agius, M; Gardner, J; Liu, K; Zaman, R, 2010
)
0.36
"Nineteen healthy volunteers underwent a gastric barostat, gastric emptying and/or a drinking test after dosing with either placebo or citalopram (20 mg intravenously)."( The effects of acute citalopram dosing on gastric motor function and nutrient tolerance in healthy volunteers.
Casteels, C; Janssen, P; Tack, J; Van Oudenhove, L; Verbeke, K; Vos, R, 2011
)
0.89
"Among 811 adults with moderate-to-severe depression, melancholic, atypical, anxious and anxious-somatizing depression subtypes established at baseline were evaluated as predictors of outcome of treatment with flexible dosage of the SSRI escitalopram or the tricyclic antidepressant nortriptyline."( Melancholic, atypical and anxious depression subtypes and outcome of treatment with escitalopram and nortriptyline.
Aitchison, KJ; Dernovsek, MZ; Farmer, A; Hauser, J; Henigsberg, N; Kalember, P; Maier, W; McGuffin, P; Mendlewicz, J; Mors, O; Placentino, A; Rietschel, M; Souery, D; Uher, R; Zobel, A, 2011
)
0.77
" Patients on higher dosage of antidepressant have higher risk of having FSD."( Female sexual dysfunction in patients treated with antidepressant-comparison between escitalopram and fluoxetine.
Asmidar, D; Guan, NC; Hod, R; Sidi, H, 2012
)
0.6
" Trials of citalopram and escitalopram were associated with reports of persistent nausea and gastric reflux unresolved by changes in dosing schedule or positioning."( Antidepressant-mediated gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Brahm, NC; Kelly-Rehm, MC, 2011
)
0.76
" Despite therapeutic doses, a significant number of patients had serum concentrations less than 50 ng/mL, and these were associated with an unfavorable treatment outcome; therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to optimize dosing citalopram in the early phase of treatment."( Association between citalopram serum levels and clinical improvement of patients with major depression.
Boland, K; Dragicevic, A; Fric, M; Hiemke, C; Laux, G; Müller, MJ; Ostad Haji, E; Rao, ML; Tadić, A; Wagner, S, 2011
)
0.88
"We tested nine symptom dimensions derived from a previously published factor analysis of depression rating scales as predictors of outcome in 811 adults with moderate to severe depression treated with flexibly dosed escitalopram or nortriptyline in Genome-based Therapeutic Drugs for Depression (GENDEP)."( Depression symptom dimensions as predictors of antidepressant treatment outcome: replicable evidence for interest-activity symptoms.
Aitchison, KJ; Bajs, M; Dernovsek, MZ; Farmer, A; Hauser, J; Henigsberg, N; Maier, W; McGuffin, P; Mors, O; Perlis, RH; Rietschel, M; Souery, D; Uher, R; Zobel, A, 2012
)
0.56
" Although perturbation of the serotonin system during neonatal life has been implicated in the long-term behavioral effects of neonatal antidepressant exposure, dose-response studies were necessary to confirm that inhibition of the serotonin transporter during the neonatal period is sufficient to produce impairments in sexual behavior."( Dose-dependent effects of neonatal SSRI exposure on adult behavior in the rat.
Harris, SS; Lin, RC; Maciag, D; Paul, IA; Simpson, KL, 2012
)
0.38
" Moderate to high antidepressant dosage is another significant predictor of HSD in depressed women treated with SSRIs."( Hypoactive sexual desire among depressed female patients treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a comparison between escitalopram and fluoxetine.
Asmidar, D; Guan, NC; Hod, R; Jaafar, NR; Sidi, H, 2012
)
0.58
"99) and escitalopram dosage (r = -0."( An integrative assessment of the psychophysiologic alterations in young women with recurrent major depressive disorder.
Chang, JS; Choi, HM; Ha, K; Ha, TH; Her, JY; Park, T; Yi, SH; Yoo, CS, 2012
)
0.78
" Citalopram dose-response was evaluated."( Comparison of citalopram and other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor ingestions in children.
Benson, BE; Klein-Schwartz, W; Lee, SC; Litovitz, T, 2012
)
1.65
"In clinical practice, indication and dosage of citalopram and other SSRIs should be carefully monitored."( Citalopram-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus -- first case and review concerning photosensitivity in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
Conrad, R; Geiser, F; Röhrs, S,
)
1.83
" Escitalopram was started at 10 mg/d with a dosage increase to 20 mg/d after 4 weeks; placebo dosing was identical."( Escitalopram for treatment of night eating syndrome: a 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Gadde, KM; Gang, CH; Griffing, GT; Vander Wal, JS, 2012
)
1.72
" Quantitative proteomic analyses were undertaken on hippocampal tissue from a study design that used two inbred mouse strains, two depressogenic protocols and a control condition, (maternal separation, chronic mild stress, control), two antidepressant drugs and two dosing protocols."( Pharmacoproteomic investigation into antidepressant response in two mouse inbred strains.
Aitchinson, KJ; Binder, E; Campbell, J; Craig, I; Davies, M; Keers, R; Kuhn, K; Malki, K; McGuffin, P; Paya-Cano, J; Schalkwyk, LC; Selzer, S; Sluyter, F; Uher, R; Ward, M, 2012
)
0.38
" The aim of this study was to describe characteristics of dosing history in participants with depression receiving once daily escitalopram."( Adherence to escitalopram treatment in depression: a study of electronically compiled dosing histories in the 'Depression: the search for phenotypes' study.
Anderton, J; Bies, RR; Buttenfield, J; Fagiolini, A; Frank, E; Jin, Y; Kepple, G; Kupfer, DJ; Lange, AC; Pollock, BG; Rucci, P; Vrijens, B; Wessels, AM, 2012
)
0.94
" Escitalopram and other SSRIs decrease the HPA axis response to the DST, beeing the aim of this study validate the DST as a surrogate marker of central serotonergic activity in the treatment with escitalopram and its application to the calculation of the dosage regimens."( Therapeutic monitoring of escitalopram by dexamethasone suppression test.
Lozano-Ortiz, R; Marin-Lacasa, R; Orea-Ramón, B; Pascual-Garcia, A; Santacruz-Abion, MJ; Sebastian-Perez, F,
)
1.05
"The objective of the current study was to develop a validated, specific stability-indicating reversed-phase liquid chromatographic (LC) method for the quantitative determination of escitalopram oxalate and clonazepam and their related substances in bulk drugs and pharmaceutical dosage forms in the presence of degradation products."( Stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of escitalopram oxalate and clonazepam.
Gadapayale, KK; Kakde, MG; Kakde, RB; Satone, DD, 2013
)
0.81
" Dosed in vivo, escitalopram had little impact on the occurrence of activity onsets in rats given access to running wheels, whether the drug was given acutely or sub-chronically."( The effects of combining serotonin reuptake inhibition and 5-HT7 receptor blockade on circadian rhythm regulation in rodents.
Sánchez, C; Sprouse, J; Westrich, L, 2013
)
0.72
"Cassette dosed plasma and brain samples from nine compounds were extracted using a protein precipitation method."( High-throughput liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry method for the quantitation of small molecules using accurate mass technologies in supporting discovery drug screening.
Dean, B; Deshmukh, G; Ding, X; Ghobarah, H; Hop, CE; Jaochico, A; Liederer, BM; Liu, X; Zhang, X, 2013
)
0.39
"To make an informed benefit-risk evaluation of a drug, a range of doses needs to be evaluated and its dose-response and exposure-response relationships for safety and effectiveness assessed during drug development (International Conference on Harmonisation E4)."( Is this the dose for you?: the role of modeling.
Bhattaram, A; Huang, SM; Mehrotra, N; Wang, Y, 2013
)
0.39
"25 mg/day; escitalopram dosage remained at 10 mg/day."( Combining a dopamine agonist and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor for the treatment of depression: a double-blind, randomized pilot study.
Franco-Chaves, JA; Luckenbaugh, DA; Mallinger, AG; Martinez, PE; Mateus, CF; Zarate, CA, 2013
)
0.76
" Cox regression models, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics, were used to examine associations of antidepressant dosing with ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac, noncardiac, and all-cause mortality."( Evaluation of the FDA warning against prescribing citalopram at doses exceeding 40 mg.
Blow, FC; Bohnert, AS; Ganoczy, D; Kales, HC; Nallamothu, BK; Pfeiffer, PN; Zivin, K, 2013
)
0.64
"The data taken together indicate that TDM-guided dosing of citalopram has the potential to be cost effective by reducing the length of hospitalization."( Potential cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring for depressed patients treated with citalopram.
Boland, K; Dragicevic, A; Fric, M; Hiemke, C; Laux, G; Mann, K; Müller, MJ; Ostad Haji, E; Rao, ML, 2013
)
0.85
"Decomposed bone and plasma samples of rats exposed to amitriptyline (AMI) and citalopram (CIT) under different dosing patterns were analyzed."( Discrimination between patterns of drug exposure by toxicological analysis of decomposed skeletal tissues. Part II: Amitriptyline and citalopram.
Cornthwaite, HM; Watterson, JH, 2013
)
0.82
"Adolescents (12-17 years) who completed an 8-week randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, placebo-controlled, lead-in study of escitalopram 10-20 mg versus placebo could enroll in a 16-24-week, multisite extension trial; patients maintained the same lead-in randomization (escitalopram or placebo) and dosage (escitalopram 10 or 20 mg/day, or placebo) during the extension."( Escitalopram in the treatment of adolescent depression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled extension trial.
Bose, A; Findling, RL; Robb, A, 2013
)
1.32
"12-week trial of flexibly dosed citalopram."( Structural imaging in late-life depression: association with mood and cognitive responses to antidepressant treatment.
Kraut, MA; Lyman, CH; Marano, CM; Munro, CA; Smith, GS; Workman, CI, 2015
)
0.7
" Here, the in vivo effects of dosing with duloxetine 60 mg once daily for 11 days in healthy subjects were assessed in 2 studies: (1) centrally (n = 11), by measuring concentrations of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG), and NE in cerebrospinal fluid, and (2) versus escitalopram 20 mg/d (n = 32) in a 2-period crossover study by assessing the ΔDHPG/ΔNE ratio in plasma during orthostatic testing and by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of reuptake inhibition using subjects' serum in cell lines expressing cloned human 5-HTT or NET."( Effects of duloxetine on norepinephrine and serotonin transporter activity in healthy subjects.
Chappell, JC; Dean, RA; Detke, MJ; Eisenhofer, G; Haber, H; Iyengar, S; Knadler, MP; Lachno, DR; Lobo, ED; Mitchell, MI; Nemeroff, CB; Owens, MJ; Pangallo, B, 2014
)
0.58
"Two hundred forty-five outpatients aged 18-65 having non-psychotic, non-bipolar major depression were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with bupropion or escitalopram or the combination dosed to a maximum of bupropion 450 mg/d and/or escitalopram 40 mg/d for 12 weeks."( Combination antidepressant therapy for major depressive disorder: speed and probability of remission.
Amat, J; Bergeron, R; Blier, P; Blondeau, C; Chen, Y; Deliyannides, DA; Hellerstein, D; Laberge, L; McGrath, PJ; Norris, S; O'Shea, D; Pilowsky, DJ; Stewart, JW; Tessier, P; Withers, A, 2014
)
0.6
" Dosage began at 10 mg per day with planned titration to 30 mg per day over 3 weeks based on response and tolerability."( Effect of citalopram on agitation in Alzheimer disease: the CitAD randomized clinical trial.
Devanand, DP; Drye, LT; Frangakis, C; Ismail, Z; Lyketsos, CG; Marano, C; Meinert, CL; Mintzer, JE; Munro, CA; Pelton, G; Pollock, BG; Porsteinsson, AP; Rabins, PV; Rosenberg, PB; Schneider, LS; Shade, DM; Weintraub, D; Yesavage, J, 2014
)
0.8
"Among patients with probable Alzheimer disease and agitation who were receiving psychosocial intervention, the addition of citalopram compared with placebo significantly reduced agitation and caregiver distress; however, cognitive and cardiac adverse effects of citalopram may limit its practical application at the dosage of 30 mg per day."( Effect of citalopram on agitation in Alzheimer disease: the CitAD randomized clinical trial.
Devanand, DP; Drye, LT; Frangakis, C; Ismail, Z; Lyketsos, CG; Marano, C; Meinert, CL; Mintzer, JE; Munro, CA; Pelton, G; Pollock, BG; Porsteinsson, AP; Rabins, PV; Rosenberg, PB; Schneider, LS; Shade, DM; Weintraub, D; Yesavage, J, 2014
)
1.01
" Glycaemia values returned to normality only after suspension of escitalopram, despite antidiabetic dosage increase."( A case report on escitalopram-induced hyperglycaemia in a diabetic patient.
Brasesco, PC; Fucile, C; Leone, S; Martelli, A; Mattioli, F; Milano, G; Zuccoli, ML, 2013
)
0.95
" The proposed method is used to determine the citalopram in tablet dosage forms."( Spectrophotometric determination of citalopram hydrobromide in tablet dosage form using chloranil.
Ansari, TM; Raza, A, 2014
)
0.94
"While preliminary, our findings comprise the first pharmacogenetic study demonstrating an effect of the 5-HTTLPR 'S' allele load on escitalopram-induced changes in amygdala activity during emotional processing, consistent with a 5-HTT expression dosage model."( The impact of 5-HTTLPR on acute serotonin transporter blockade by escitalopram on emotion processing: preliminary findings from a randomised, crossover fMRI study.
Bryant, RA; Das, P; Dobson-Stone, C; Felmingham, KL; Kemp, AH; Malhi, GS; Nathan, PJ; Outhred, T, 2014
)
0.84
" In healthy human volunteers, citalopram's effects on Aβ production and Aβ concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were measured prospectively using stable isotope labeling kinetics, with CSF sampling during acute dosing of citalopram."( An antidepressant decreases CSF Aβ production in healthy individuals and in transgenic AD mice.
Bateman, RJ; Chott, R; Cirrito, JR; Ficker, WD; Fisher, JR; Frederiksen, C; Grzelak, MV; Jasielec, MS; Lee, JM; Mintun, MA; Morris, JC; Sheline, YI; Swarm, R; West, T; Xiong, C; Yan, P; Yarasheski, K, 2014
)
0.69
" Whether similar observations would occur after repeated administration of such compounds in an attempt to simulate dosing in humans, or be compromised by dopaminergic-mediated adverse effects warrants further investigation."( Antinociceptive activity of the new triple reuptake inhibitor NS18283 in a mouse model of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain.
Coudoré, F; Gardier, AM; Guiard, BP; Hache, G; Munro, G; Nguyen, TH; Peters, D; Quesseveur, G, 2015
)
0.42
" However, therapeutic efficacy and treatment success is often variable, requiring changes in dosing regimens or drug selection."( The development and validation of a turbulent flow-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method for the simultaneous quantification of citalopram, sertraline, bupropion and hydroxybupropion in serum.
Clarke, W; Jannetto, PJ; Johnson-Davis, KL; Langman, LJ; Marzinke, MA; Moskowitz, J; Petrides, AK, 2014
)
0.6
" The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants reduce REM sleep time and increase REM latency after acute dosing in normal condition and even during REM rebound following RD."( Chronic escitalopram treatment attenuated the accelerated rapid eye movement sleep transitions after selective rapid eye movement sleep deprivation: a model-based analysis using Markov chains.
Bagdy, G; Gyertyán, I; Kátai, Z; Kitka, T; Kostyalik, D; Tóthfalusi, L; Vas, S, 2014
)
0.8
"In this sample where antidepressant dosage is titrated using clinical judgement, P450 genotypes do not explain differences between patients in side effects with antidepressants."( Exploring the role of drug-metabolising enzymes in antidepressant side effects.
Aitchison, KJ; Craig, IW; Dernovšek, MZ; Dobson, RJ; Farmer, AE; Hauser, J; Henigsberg, N; Hodgson, K; Maier, W; McGuffin, P; Mors, O; Placentino, A; Rietschel, M; Souery, D; Tansey, KE; Uher, R, 2015
)
0.42
" Present findings may have implications for escitalopram dosage and side effect profile in younger MDD patients."( Altered serotonin and dopamine transporter availabilities in brain of depressed patients upon treatment with escitalopram: A [123 I]β-CIT SPECT study.
Bartenstein, P; Brendel, M; Cumming, P; Karch, S; Koch, W; la Fougère, C; Pogarell, O; Rominger, A; Tatsch, K; Xiong, G; Zach, C, 2015
)
0.89
"An accurate, selective and sensitive spectrofluorimetric method was developed for the determination of citalopram hydrobromide in commercial dosage forms."( Utility of eosin Y as a complexing reagent for the determination of citalopram hydrobromide in commercial dosage forms by fluorescence spectrophotometry.
Al-Badaei, M; Al-Fazari, A; Al-Mahrazi, R; Azmi, SN, 2015
)
0.87
" We calculated the ratio of the mean doses for each study and weighted it by the total sample size to find the weighted mean ratio for each drug, which was then used to define the drug׳s dosage equivalent to fluoxetine 40mg/d."( Dose equivalents of antidepressants: Evidence-based recommendations from randomized controlled trials.
Barbui, C; Cipriani, A; Furukawa, TA; Hayasaka, Y; Leucht, S; Magni, LR; Ogawa, Y; Purgato, M; Takeshima, N, 2015
)
0.42
" In the primary analysis, fluoxetine 40mg/day was equivalent to paroxetine dosage of 34."( Dose equivalents of antidepressants: Evidence-based recommendations from randomized controlled trials.
Barbui, C; Cipriani, A; Furukawa, TA; Hayasaka, Y; Leucht, S; Magni, LR; Ogawa, Y; Purgato, M; Takeshima, N, 2015
)
0.42
" Treatment for both groups started at baseline, and patients received either 12 weeks of individual CBT or 12 weeks of escitalopram with flexible dosing (10 to 20 mg)."( Similar changes in cognitions following cognitive-behavioral therapy or escitalopram for major depressive disorder: Implications for mechanisms of change.
Alpert, JE; Baer, L; Cardoos, A; Cohen, M; Farabaugh, A; Fava, M; Fisher, L; Holt, D; Huz, I; Nyer, M; Shapero, BG, 2015
)
0.86
" Nevertheless, a maximum citalopram dosage of 20 mg in high risk patients (e."( Use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and the heart rate corrected QT interval in a real-life setting: the population-based Rotterdam Study.
Aarts, N; Hofman, A; Kors, JA; Maljuric, NM; Niemeijer, MN; Noordam, R; Stricker, BH; van den Berg, ME; Visser, LE, 2015
)
0.72
" For citalopram, analyses were additionally restricted to a maximum dosage of 20 mg in participants aged 60 years and older."( Use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and the heart rate corrected QT interval in a real-life setting: the population-based Rotterdam Study.
Aarts, N; Hofman, A; Kors, JA; Maljuric, NM; Niemeijer, MN; Noordam, R; Stricker, BH; van den Berg, ME; Visser, LE, 2015
)
0.93
" This result remained similar in the analysis comprising participants aged 60 years and older with a maximum prescribed daily dosage of 20 mg citalopram."( Use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and the heart rate corrected QT interval in a real-life setting: the population-based Rotterdam Study.
Aarts, N; Hofman, A; Kors, JA; Maljuric, NM; Niemeijer, MN; Noordam, R; Stricker, BH; van den Berg, ME; Visser, LE, 2015
)
0.62
" Although candidates for elective Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery may be treated with escitalopram, drug dosing strategies are typically not adjusted postoperatively."( Decreased Escitalopram Concentrations Post-Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery.
Clarke, W; Coughlin, JW; Magnuson, TH; Marzinke, MA; Petrides, AK; Reinblatt, SP; Schweitzer, MA; Steele, K, 2015
)
1.01
" Similarly, dosing trajectory was not significantly associated with genotype groups."( Pharmacogenetic Study of Serotonin Transporter and 5HT2A Genotypes in Autism.
Bishop, JR; Cook, EH; Gibbons, RD; Guter, SJ; Hur, K; Jacob, S; Mosconi, MW; Najjar, F; Owley, T; Sweeney, JA, 2015
)
0.42
" CYP2C19 encodes the primary enzyme responsible for escitalopram metabolism and we investigated whether polymorphisms in CYP2C19 were related to symptoms and dosing in a pharmacogenetic study of ASD."( Escitalopram pharmacogenetics: CYP2C19 relationships with dosing and clinical outcomes in autism spectrum disorder.
Bishop, JR; Cook, EH; Guter, SJ; Jacob, S; Mosconi, MW; Najjar, F; Owley, T; Rubin, LH, 2015
)
1.39
" Further studies should evaluate whether repeated dosing of SSRIs, or as combined with specific interventions, is required to elicit significant benefit of these agents on lower limb function poststroke."( Increased Lower Limb Spasticity but Not Strength or Function Following a Single-Dose Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor in Chronic Stroke.
Gourab, K; Hornby, TG; Schmit, BD, 2015
)
0.42
" The present study was designed to clarify the relationship between dosage and treatment response in major depressive disorder."( Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Dose-Response Relationship of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Major Depressive Disorder.
Bloch, MH; Freemantle, N; Jakubovski, E; Taylor, MJ; Varigonda, AL, 2016
)
0.43
" Endpoint and tolerability analyses were analyzed using meta-regression and stratified subgroup analysis by predefined SSRI dose categories in order to assess the effect of SSRI dosing on the efficacy and tolerability of SSRIs for major depressive disorder."( Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Dose-Response Relationship of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Major Depressive Disorder.
Bloch, MH; Freemantle, N; Jakubovski, E; Taylor, MJ; Varigonda, AL, 2016
)
0.43
" Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the risk of suicidality among children associated with use of antidepressants, but the warning's effect on dosing of antidepressants has not been evaluated."( Dosing of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors Among Children and Adults Before and After the FDA Black-Box Warning.
Azrael, D; Bushnell, GA; Miller, M; Pate, V; Stürmer, T; Swanson, SA; White, A, 2016
)
0.43
"The proportion of commercially insured children initiating an SSRI with a low dose was higher after the 2004 FDA warning on the risk of suicidality among children, suggesting improved prescribing practices surrounding SSRI dosing among children."( Dosing of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors Among Children and Adults Before and After the FDA Black-Box Warning.
Azrael, D; Bushnell, GA; Miller, M; Pate, V; Stürmer, T; Swanson, SA; White, A, 2016
)
0.43
"In this double-blind parallel-group multicenter trial of 186 patients with Alzheimer's disease and clinically significant agitation, participants were randomly assigned to receive citalopram or placebo for 9 weeks, with the dosage titrated to 30 mg/day over the first 3 weeks."( Heterogeneity of Treatment Response to Citalopram for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease With Aggression or Agitation: The CitAD Randomized Clinical Trial.
Devanand, DP; Drye, LT; Frangakis, C; Lyketsos, CG; Marano, CM; Mintzer, J; Mulsant, BH; Munro, CA; Newell, JA; Pawluczyk, S; Pelton, G; Pollock, BG; Porsteinsson, AP; Rabins, PV; Rein, L; Rosenberg, PB; Schneider, LS; Shade, D; Weintraub, D; Yesavage, J, 2016
)
0.9
" These results indicate that higher doses of these drugs could lead to greater QT prolongation in a dose-response manner."( A thorough QT study to evaluate the QTc prolongation potential of two neuropsychiatric drugs, quetiapine and escitalopram, in healthy volunteers.
Cho, JY; Chung, H; Chung, JY; Jang, IJ; Kim, A; Lee, H; Lim, KS; Yoon, SH; Yu, KS, 2016
)
0.65
"While dosage constraints must be considered because of citalopram's adverse effect profile, this agent's overall therapeutic effects in patients with Alzheimer's disease and agitation, in addition to efficacy for agitation/aggression, included reductions in the frequency of irritability, anxiety, and delusions; among patients who had these symptoms at week 9, they included a reduction in the severity of hallucinations but an increase in the severity of sleep/nighttime behavior disorders."( Effects of Citalopram on Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Alzheimer's Dementia: Evidence From the CitAD Study.
Devanand, DP; Drye, LT; Frangakis, C; Leonpacher, AK; Lyketsos, CG; Makino, KM; Mintzer, JE; Munro, CA; Newell, JA; Peters, ME; Pollock, BG; Porsteinsson, AP; Rosenberg, PB; Schneider, LS; Shade, DM; Weintraub, D; Yesavage, J, 2016
)
1.07
" All drugs showed maximum occupancy at 4h after dosing and then decreasing occupancies with time."( Time-course of serotonin transporter occupancy by single dose of three SSRIs in human brain: A positron emission tomography study with [(11)C]DASB.
Arakawa, R; Kim, W; Ogawa, K; Okubo, Y; Sakayori, T; Tateno, A, 2016
)
0.43
"Eligible participants were randomised 1 : 1 to treatment with either placebo (one capsule) or 20 mg of citalopram per day for 48 weeks, with the clinical option at 4 weeks to increase the daily dosage to 40 mg of citalopram or two placebo capsules for the remainder of the study."( Antidepressant Controlled Trial For Negative Symptoms In Schizophrenia (ACTIONS): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial.
Baldwin, D; Barnes, TR; Costelloe, C; Craig, TK; Crawford, M; Geddes, J; Ismail, S; Keown, P; Killaspy, H; Kiss, N; Kumar, M; Leeson, VC; Lewis, G; Lewis, S; Osborn, D; Pathak, R; Paton, C; Simon, J; Taylor, S, 2016
)
0.65
" All-cause hospitalizations or deaths were found to significantly increase after dosage reductions (adjusted hazard ratio=4."( Outcomes of Citalopram Dosage Risk Mitigation in a Veteran Population.
Adabag, S; Cunningham, F; Dieperink, E; Nelson, D; Rector, TS, 2016
)
0.81
" In contrast, among doses above these, there was no indication of a dose-response relationship."( A mega-analysis of fixed-dose trials reveals dose-dependency and a rapid onset of action for the antidepressant effect of three selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
Eriksson, E; Hieronymus, F; Nilsson, S, 2016
)
0.43
" These data reveal age- and genotype-dependent shifts in the dose-response for escitalopram to produce antidepressant-like effects, which vary with SERT expression, and may contribute to the limited therapeutic response to SSRIs in juveniles and adolescents."( Ontogeny of SERT Expression and Antidepressant-like Response to Escitalopram in Wild-Type and SERT Mutant Mice.
Daws, LC; Gould, GG; Koek, W; Mitchell, NC, 2016
)
0.9
" To this aim, we exploited the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) data set, selected a subpopulation of 591 patients with an overlapping clinical history and analyzed treatment outcome according to dosage -20 or 40 mg per day of citalopram."( Citalopram amplifies the influence of living conditions on mood in depressed patients enrolled in the STAR*D study.
Branchi, I; Chiarotti, F; Giuliani, A; Viglione, A, 2017
)
2.08
"Although the favourable characteristics of escitalopram as being the most selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and having an increased therapeutic efficacy via binding on an additional allosteric binding site of the serotonin transporter, its dosing regimen has not yet been optimized for its use in dogs."( Estimation of the optimal dosing regimen of escitalopram in dogs: A dose occupancy study with [11C]DASB.
Baeken, C; De Vos, F; Dobbeleir, A; Dockx, R; Goethals, I; Peremans, K; Polis, I; Sadones, N; Saunders, J; Taylor, O; Van Laeken, N; Vlerick, L, 2017
)
0.97
"The median daily dosage of citalopram was 20mg (Q1: 10mg, Q3: 20mg; range 10-40mg)."( Pregnancy exposure to citalopram - Therapeutic drug monitoring in maternal blood, amniotic fluid and cord blood.
Goecke, TW; Gründer, G; Janssen, G; Paulzen, M; Schoretsanitis, G; Stickeler, E; Stingl, JC, 2017
)
1.07
"This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated dose-response relationships of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate when used as augmentation for major depressive disorder in individuals exhibiting inadequate responses to antidepressant monotherapy."( A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate augmentation for major depressive disorder in adults with inadequate response to antidepressant therapy.
Dauphin, M; Geibel, B; Iosifescu, DV; Mago, R; Reynolds, J; Richards, C; Sarkis, E, 2017
)
0.46
"For Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score change, no significant dose-responses were observed for any candidate dose-response curve (all p>0."( A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate augmentation for major depressive disorder in adults with inadequate response to antidepressant therapy.
Dauphin, M; Geibel, B; Iosifescu, DV; Mago, R; Reynolds, J; Richards, C; Sarkis, E, 2017
)
0.46
"To assess the risk of headache associated with commonly prescribed antidepressant medications and to examine the impact of medication class, pharmacodynamics and dosage on risk of headache."( Meta-analysis: Second generation antidepressants and headache.
Bloch, MH; Olten, B; Telang, S; Walton, C, 2018
)
0.48
"The small number of studies that examined side effects within fixed-dose trials may have limited the power to examine the association between medication dosing and risk of headache."( Meta-analysis: Second generation antidepressants and headache.
Bloch, MH; Olten, B; Telang, S; Walton, C, 2018
)
0.48
" However, gamma activity during active and passive wakefulness (AW and PW, respectively) was not influenced by either acute or chronic dosing of escitalopram."( Acute and chronic escitalopram alter EEG gamma oscillations differently: relevance to therapeutic effects.
Bagdy, G; Bogáthy, E; Kátai, Z; Kostyalik, D; Papp, N; Vas, S, 2018
)
1
" Serum concentration of citalopram and daily dosage correlated positively while daily dosage and mother milk concentration did not (rho = 0."( Antidepressants in breast milk; comparative analysis of excretion ratios.
Augustin, M; Franz, C; Gründer, G; Paulzen, M; Saßmannshausen, H; Schoretsanitis, G, 2019
)
0.82
"The present study involved segmental testing of hair in two clinical cases with known dosage histories."( Segmental Hair Analysis-Interpretation of the Time of Drug Intake in Two Patients Undergoing Drug Treatment.
Johansen, SS; Linnet, K; Nielsen, MKK; Wang, X, 2019
)
0.51
" Rats were chronically dosed with respectively clomipramine, citalopram, or midazolam."( Distribution of clomipramine, citalopram, midazolam, and metabolites in skeletal tissue after chronic dosing in rats.
Cuypers, E; Somers, T; Vandenbosch, M, 2019
)
1.04
"Although the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended upper limits for citalopram dosing in older adults due to risk of corrected-QT (QTc) prolongation, which was adopted, and extended to escitalopram by Health Canada, the scientific basis is unclear."( Association between citalopram, escitalopram and QTc prolongation in a real-world geriatric setting.
Brown, HK; Crépeau-Gendron, G; Koh, S; Madan, R; Mah, L; Shorey, C; Szabuniewicz, C; Veinish, S, 2019
)
1.06
"We reviewed electronic health records at a university-affiliated geriatric health care center, over a 7-year period, to identify patients prescribed citalopram and escitalopram, who had an ECG within 90 days of initiation or dosage change."( Association between citalopram, escitalopram and QTc prolongation in a real-world geriatric setting.
Brown, HK; Crépeau-Gendron, G; Koh, S; Madan, R; Mah, L; Shorey, C; Szabuniewicz, C; Veinish, S, 2019
)
1.04
" This study compared the efficacy and safety of switching patients with treatment-resistant depression from an ineffective antidepressant to flexibly dosed esketamine nasal spray plus a newly initiated antidepressant or to a newly initiated antidepressant (active comparator) plus placebo nasal spray."( Efficacy and Safety of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a Newly Initiated Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Study.
Bajbouj, M; Cooper, K; Daly, EJ; Drevets, WC; Hough, D; Lane, R; Lim, P; Manji, H; Mazzucco, C; Molero, P; Popova, V; Shelton, RC; Singh, JB; Thase, ME; Trivedi, M; Vieta, E, 2019
)
0.51
"The aims of this study were to characterize escitalopram pharmacokinetic profile, to identify factors influencing drug exposure, notably drug-drug interactions with antiretrovirals, and to simulate expected exposure under standard dosage regimen."( Escitalopram population pharmacokinetics in people living with human immunodeficiency virus and in the psychiatric population: Drug-drug interactions and probability of target attainment.
Alves Saldanha, S; Buclin, T; Cavassini, M; Courlet, P; Csajka, C; Decosterd, LA; Eap, CB; Glatard, A; Guidi, M; Marzolini, C, 2019
)
1.49
"The variability in escitalopram disposition is large and poorly explained by demographic, clinical and environmental covariates, thus suggesting a role for dosage individualization based on therapeutic drug monitoring in case of poor clinical response."( Escitalopram population pharmacokinetics in people living with human immunodeficiency virus and in the psychiatric population: Drug-drug interactions and probability of target attainment.
Alves Saldanha, S; Buclin, T; Cavassini, M; Courlet, P; Csajka, C; Decosterd, LA; Eap, CB; Glatard, A; Guidi, M; Marzolini, C, 2019
)
1.55
" This conditioned geotaxis was reduced by the administration of citalopram in a linear dose-response curve and ethanol at the low concentration."( Design and development of a robotic predator as a stimulus in conditioned place aversion for the study of the effect of ethanol and citalopram in zebrafish.
Clément, RJG; Macrì, S; Porfiri, M, 2020
)
1
" Reduction in the magnitude of the excitatory post-synaptic currents by endogenous 5-HT was interpolated in the dose-response curve elicited by exogenous 5-HT, yielding that citalopram raised the extracellular 5-HT concentration to 823 nM."( Citalopram reduces glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the auditory cortex via activation of 5-HT1A receptors.
Aguilar-Magaña, D; Atzori, M; Canto-Bustos, M; Cervantes-Ramírez, V; Góngora-Alfaro, JL; Pérez-Padilla, EA; Pineda, JC; Salgado, H, 2019
)
2.15
" We investigated the dosage assumptions of 1 unit per day, and 1 DDD per day, versus actual prescribed dosage under different handling of gaps and overlaps of prescriptions."( Methods for constructing treatment episodes and impact on exposure-outcome associations.
Andersen, M; Bahmanyar, S; Brandt, L; Linder, M; Mavros, P; Myers, D; Pazzagli, L, 2020
)
0.56
"Fifty-eight patients with MDD (DSM-V) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) score ≥ 19 were randomized to receive either 400 mg twice daily L-Carnosine or placebo in addition to citalopram (maximum dosage of 40 mg/day) for six weeks in a randomized double-blind, and placebo-controlled study."( L-Carnosine combination therapy for major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Akhondzadeh, S; Aqamolaei, A; Araminia, B; Ardebili, ME; Ghaffari, S; Mortazavi, SH; Mortezaei, A; Naderi, S; Sahebolzamani, E; Shalbafan, M; Shariati, B; Shirazi, E, 2020
)
0.75
" Some symptoms appeared whilst I reduced the antidepressant dosage steadily: these were mild and resolved swiftly, but a few were quite puzzling."( A personal account of reducing and stopping antidepressant treatment.
Baldwin, DS, 2020
)
0.56
" To evaluate the effects of GPR139 pharmacological activation on sleep, rats were orally dosed with the selective GPR139 agonist JNJ-63533054 (3-30 mg/kg)."( Putative role of GPR139 on sleep modulation using pharmacological and genetic rodent models.
Bonaventure, P; Dugovic, C; Dvorak, C; Liu, C; Lord, B; Lovenberg, T; Wang, L; White, A; Yun, S, 2020
)
0.56
" A sensitive, efficient and rapid assay was selected satisfactorily and applied for simultaneous determination of citalopram and tadalafil either in their pure forms, in tablet dosage forms or in spiked human plasma."( Simultaneous determination of citalopram and tadalafil by the second derivative synchronous fluorescence method in biological fluids; application of Box-Behnken optimization design.
Abdel-Fattah, A; Abdel-Raoof, AM; Eissa, MS; Hasan, MA; Madkour, AW, 2021
)
1.12
"Application of capillary electrophoresis (CE) has become a rapidly growing analytical technique for the estimation of drugs in pharmaceutical dosage forms and biological fluids."( Capillary Electrophoresis Method for Determination of Escitalopram Oxalate in Urine Samples and Different Dosage Forms.
Arlı, G; Atkoşar, Z; Badulla, WFS; Dal Poçan, AG, 2020
)
0.8
"Escitalopram significantly reduced Aβ in mice, similar to previous findings in humans treated with acute dosing of an SSRI."( Effect of escitalopram on Aβ levels and plaque load in an Alzheimer mouse model.
Cirrito, JR; Davis, TA; Doherty, BM; Gardiner, WD; King, D; Lee, JM; Sheline, YI; Wallace, CE; Yan, P; Yuede, CM, 2020
)
1.66
"Participants with GAD and coprescribed benzodiazepines were treated with a lower mean dosage of escitalopram and were less likely to complete the trial; there was no difference in adherence or treatment response."( Coprescribed Benzodiazepines in Older Adults Receiving Antidepressants for Anxiety and Depressive Disorders: Association With Treatment Outcomes.
Altmann, H; Blumberger, DM; Gebara, MA; Karp, JF; Lenze, EJ; Mulsant, BH; Reynolds, CF; Stahl, ST, 2020
)
0.78
"We observed a linear dose-response profile with respect to geotaxis, with increasing Citalopram concentrations reducing the tendency to swim near the bottom of the tank."( Acute Citalopram administration modulates anxiety in response to the context associated with a robotic stimulus in zebrafish.
Karakaya, M; Macrì, S; Porfiri, M; Scaramuzzi, A, 2021
)
1.33
" Dosing strategies, discontinuation considerations, and side effects are discussed."( The Psychopharmacology Algorithm Project at the Harvard South Shore Program: An update on management of behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia.
Chen, A; Cloutier, A; Copeli, F; Metzger, E; Osser, DN, 2021
)
0.62
"Since several recent meta-analyses report a dose-response relationship for the antidepressant effect of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), we investigated how these drugs are dosed in clinical practice."( Low SSRI dosing in clinical practice-a register-based longitudinal study.
Eriksson, E; Hieronymus, F; Lisinski, A; Wallerstedt, SM, 2021
)
0.62
" The lack of consensus regarding effective dosing of SSRIs may have contributed to this state of affairs."( Low SSRI dosing in clinical practice-a register-based longitudinal study.
Eriksson, E; Hieronymus, F; Lisinski, A; Wallerstedt, SM, 2021
)
0.62
" Toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic submodels were used to dynamically simulate the chemical uptake and elimination, as well as dose-response relationships for hypothetical physiological modes of action and survival over time."( Making Sense of Life-History Effects of the Antidepressant Citalopram in the Copepod Nitocra spinipes Using a Bioenergetics Model.
De Schamphelaere, KAC; Koch, J, 2021
)
0.86
" Study durations ranged from 8 to 16 weeks and MPH dosing ranged from 5 to 90 mg per day."( Methylphenidate use in geriatric depression: A systematic review.
Britt, RB; Brown, JN; Kahlon, CH; Smith, KR, 2021
)
0.62
" Citalopram enhanced and prolonged the facilitation induced by anodal tDCS regardless of the dosage while turning cathodal tDCS-induced excitability diminution into facilitation."( Dosage-Dependent Impact of Acute Serotonin Enhancement on Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects.
Ghanavati, E; Kuo, MF; Melo, L; Mosayebi-Samani, M; Nitsche, MA, 2021
)
1.53
" The proportion of patients dosed above the new limit decreased from 8 to 1% in patients ≤ 65 years and from 46 to 23% in patients > 65 years old for citalopram versus 14-5% and 47-31% for escitalopram."( Dear Doctor Letters regarding citalopram and escitalopram: guidelines vs real-world data.
Bleich, S; Bridler, R; de Bardeci, M; Greil, W; Grohmann, R; Hasler, G; Kasper, S; Köberle, U; Rüther, E; Seifert, J; Stassen, H; Toto, S; Willms, J, 2023
)
1.4
" At 60 postnatal days (PD), male Wistar rats were treated chronically (16 days) with MOD at 30 or 60 mg/kg, with MOD+CIT at four dosage combinations administered to four groups (30MOD + CIT3, 30MOD + CIT5, 60MOD + CIT3, 60MOD + CIT5 mg/kg), or with a vehicle."( Modafinil acquires reinforcing effects when combined with citalopram.
Juárez, J; Yepez, JE, 2022
)
0.97
" Dose-response effects were not investigated because dosage instructions were not available."( Serious arrhythmia in initiators of citalopram, escitalopram, and other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: A population-based cohort study in older adults.
Aakjaer, M; Andersen, M; De Bruin, ML; Werther, SK, 2022
)
1
" On the other hand, a non-significant dosage of orexin-1 reversed the antidepressant effect of citalopram in the normal and REM sleep-deprived animals."( Synergistic antidepressant effects of citalopram and SB-334867 in the REM sleep-deprived mice: Possible role of BDNF.
Alibeik, H; Bananej, M; Khakpai, F; Saadati, N; Zarrindast, MR, 2022
)
1.21
" The specific recommendation on daily dosage seems to have been better implemented than the broadly formulated contraindication of QTc-prolonging co-medication."( [Effect of the direct healthcare professional communication on citalopram and escitalopram drug utilization for inpatient treatment of anxiety disorders].
Belz, M; Degner, D; Greil, W; Grohmann, R; Köberle, U, 2022
)
0.96
" The ratio could be a valuable alternative to genotyping in personalized dosing of escitalopram and possibly other CYP2C19 substrates."( Identification of Escitalopram Metabolic Ratios as Potential Biomarkers for Predicting CYP2C19 Poor Metabolizers.
Faraj, P; Hermansen, A; Hole, K; Molden, E, 2022
)
1.27
" Genotype-guided dosing and drug selection have been implemented at several sites, including Vanderbilt University Medical Center, where clinical decision support (CDS) based on pharmacogenetic results went live for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in 2020 for both adult and pediatric patients."( Pediatric considerations for pharmacogenetic selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors clinical decision support.
Liu, M; Maxwell-Horn, AC; Rossow, KM; Saucier, LA; Van Driest, SL, 2023
)
0.91
" This guideline updates and expands the 2015 Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes and SSRI dosing and summarizes the impact of CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP2B6, SLC6A4, and HTR2A genotypes on antidepressant dosing, efficacy, and tolerability."( Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP2B6, SLC6A4, and HTR2A Genotypes and Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Antidepressants.
Bell, GC; Bishop, JR; Bousman, CA; Brown, JT; Caudle, KE; Gaedigk, A; Hicks, JK; Klein, TE; Leeder, JS; Mueller, DJ; Ramsey, LB; Ruaño, G; Sangkuhl, K; Scott, SA; Singh, AB; Stevenson, JM; Strawn, JR; Tsermpini, EE, 2023
)
0.91
" However, it is important to acknowledge certain limitations of our research, such as the use of a single depression induction model and limited dosing regimens."( Vitamins C and D Exhibit Similar Antidepressant Effects to Escitalopram Mediated by NOx and FKBPL in a Stress-Induced Mice Model.
Aljabali, AAA; Alqudah, A; Altaber, S; Gammoh, O; Ibrahim, A; Qnais, E; Tambuwala, MM, 2023
)
1.15
" It has a narrow therapeutic window and can cause severe toxicity and mortality if the dosage exceeds the safe level."( Toward Personalized Treatment of Depression: An Affordable Citalopram Test based on a Solid-Contact Potentiometric Electrode for at-Home Monitoring of the Antidepressant Dosage.
Amirghasemi, F; Chen, R; Ma, H; Mousavi, MPS; Ong, V; Tran, A, 2023
)
1.15
" Binding of inhibitors to the allosteric site of human SERT (hSERT) impedes the dissociation of antidepressants bound at the central site and may enhance the efficacy of such antidepressants to potentially reduce their dosage and side effects."( Dynamic extracellular vestibule of human SERT: Unveiling druggable potential with high-affinity allosteric inhibitors.
Abramyan, AM; Bang-Andersen, B; Bundgaard, C; Loland, CJ; Plenge, P; Salomon, K; Shi, L; Wang, L, 2023
)
0.91
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Drug Classes (5)

ClassDescription
2-benzofurans
nitrileA compound having the structure RC#N; thus a C-substituted derivative of hydrocyanic acid, HC#N. In systematic nomenclature, the suffix nitrile denotes the triply bound #N atom, not the carbon atom attached to it.
organofluorine compoundAn organofluorine compound is a compound containing at least one carbon-fluorine bond.
cyclic etherAny ether in which the oxygen atom forms part of a ring.
tertiary amino compoundA compound formally derived from ammonia by replacing three hydrogen atoms by organyl groups.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (3)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
Citalopram Action Pathway3724
Citalopram Metabolism Pathway715
Serotonin transporter activity03

Protein Targets (42)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
thioredoxin reductaseRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.06100.100020.879379.4328AID588453; AID588456
aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1Homo sapiens (human)Potency14.12540.011212.4002100.0000AID1030
EWS/FLI fusion proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency16.69960.001310.157742.8575AID1259252; AID1259253; AID1259256
euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency35.99320.035520.977089.1251AID504332
NPC intracellular cholesterol transporter 1 precursorHomo sapiens (human)Potency20.59620.01262.451825.0177AID485313
D(1A) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency15.84890.02245.944922.3872AID488983
survival motor neuron protein isoform dHomo sapiens (human)Potency1.12200.125912.234435.4813AID1458
Spike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusPotency10.00000.009610.525035.4813AID1479145
Ataxin-2Homo sapiens (human)Potency35.48130.011912.222168.7989AID588378
ATP-dependent phosphofructokinaseTrypanosoma brucei brucei TREU927Potency37.93300.060110.745337.9330AID485368
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Solute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)18.80000.21005.553710.0000AID386625
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Sodium-dependent noradrenaline transporterMus musculus (house mouse)Ki1.00000.01200.09050.2900AID134216
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 4Cavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)IC50 (µMol)0.29700.00011.00768.7800AID625218
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 4Cavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)Ki0.15600.00000.887110.0000AID625218
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.11007.190310.0000AID1473738
Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)2.19600.00041.877310.0000AID625207
Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki2.17800.00322.28879.3160AID625207
Tryptophan 5-hydroxylase 1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki16.54000.00050.09140.4900AID64517
Angiotensin-converting enzymeOryctolagus cuniculus (rabbit)IC50 (µMol)16.67540.00001.612910.0000AID625171
Angiotensin-converting enzymeOryctolagus cuniculus (rabbit)Ki13.66180.00042.03378.6606AID625171
Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)Ki0.00440.00040.00180.0044AID408801
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1ARattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki50.11870.00010.739610.0000AID4411
AcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)73.30000.00000.933210.0000AID1738334
AromataseRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.00180.00181.85646.2000AID179069
Sodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)2.19600.00081.541620.0000AID625207
Sodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)Ki336.12270.00031.465610.0000AID147725; AID625207; AID731396
Sodium-dependent dopamine transporterRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)41.00000.00070.97749.7000AID179076
Alpha-1D adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)3.28900.00020.75688.8970AID625200
Alpha-1D adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki1.61700.00000.360910.0000AID625200
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.29700.00011.03029.0000AID625218
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.15600.00010.954910.0000AID625218
Sodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.02270.00010.86458.7096AID1058858; AID1434653; AID1495956; AID1659263; AID1738335; AID1783170; AID1824583; AID576813; AID625222
Sodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.01180.00000.70488.1930AID1718178; AID204199; AID361595; AID361596; AID408801; AID408802; AID625222; AID731395
Sodium-dependent serotonin transporterRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.00270.00030.81978.4900AID1059389; AID179069; AID471630
Histamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)3.19400.00000.44365.1768AID625269
Histamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.37100.00000.511010.0000AID625269
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.83900.00011.18738.9125AID625217
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)Ki1.17100.00030.769310.0000AID625217
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 7Cavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)IC50 (µMol)18.80002.03005.53139.9000AID386625
Sodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)Ki508.27000.00021.11158.0280AID64517; AID731394
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)5.43490.00091.901410.0000AID1054122; AID161281; AID243151; AID408340; AID576612; AID625171
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)Ki13.66180.00211.840710.0000AID625171
Sigma intracellular receptor 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki5.41000.00241.10509.3000AID1718151
Sodium-dependent serotonin transporterMus musculus (house mouse)Ki0.00290.00040.59574.1000AID134217
Sodium-dependent dopamine transporterMus musculus (house mouse)Ki10.00000.40400.68731.0350AID134215
Nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 3 Bos taurus (cattle)IC50 (µMol)16.67540.10482.83988.3173AID625171
Nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 3 Bos taurus (cattle)Ki13.66180.08582.95428.6606AID625171
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739
Sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.39800.00030.70285.3660AID625223
Sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.16700.00000.490110.0000AID625223
Sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki0.29200.00030.26715.0700AID1718165
TransporterRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)8.80000.00081.95628.8000AID179081
TransporterRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki6.19000.00010.866710.0000AID147725
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Sodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)8.70000.00112.38838.7000AID1434655
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (215)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
serotonin transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
establishment or maintenance of transmembrane electrochemical gradientSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
quaternary ammonium group transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
putrescine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
epinephrine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
serotonin uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
metanephric proximal tubule developmentSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
purine-containing compound transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic cation transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
(R)-carnitine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
acyl carnitine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
cellular detoxificationSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
retinoid metabolic processAldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)
prostaglandin metabolic processAldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)
retinol metabolic processAldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)
acetylcholine catabolic process in synaptic cleftAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of receptor recyclingAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
osteoblast developmentAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine catabolic processAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cell adhesionAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
nervous system developmentAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
synapse assemblyAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
receptor internalizationAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of synaptic transmission, cholinergicAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
amyloid precursor protein metabolic processAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein secretionAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
retina development in camera-type eyeAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
monoamine transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to painSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine uptakeSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
amino acid transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine uptake involved in synaptic transmissionSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayAlpha-1D adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-modulating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayAlpha-1D adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferationAlpha-1D adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuron-glial cell signalingAlpha-1D adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell-cell signalingAlpha-1D adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating adrenergic receptor signaling pathwayAlpha-1D adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayAlpha-1D adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationAlpha-1D adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vasoconstrictionAlpha-1D adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeAlpha-1D adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral fear response5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular calcium ion homeostasis5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
locomotory behavior5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
feeding behavior5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol biosynthetic process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP-mediated signaling5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of nervous system process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of appetite5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of corticotropin-releasing hormone secretion5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fat cell differentiation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of calcium-mediated signaling5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosol5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messenger5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmission5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
monoamine transportSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to hypoxiaSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to nutrientSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
memorySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
circadian rhythmSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to toxic substanceSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of serotonin secretionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cerebellar granule cell precursor proliferationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of synaptic transmission, dopaminergicSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to estradiolSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
social behaviorSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
vasoconstrictionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
sperm ejaculationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuron differentiationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell cycleSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of organ growthSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to cocaineSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
enteric nervous system developmentSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
brain morphogenesisSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin uptakeSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarizationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
platelet aggregationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to retinoic acidSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cGMPSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of thalamus sizeSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
conditioned place preferenceSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
amino acid transportSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
memoryHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
visual learningHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of vascular permeabilityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vasoconstrictionHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of synaptic plasticityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to histamineHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathwayHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neural crest cell migration5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytokine production5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of endothelial cell proliferation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor internalization5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
heart morphogenesis5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle hypertrophy5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular calcium ion homeostasis5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
activation of phospholipase C activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulus5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol biosynthetic process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
neural crest cell differentiation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
intestine smooth muscle contraction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
phosphorylation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
calcium-mediated signaling5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP-mediated signaling5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
vasoconstriction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of canonical NF-kappaB signal transduction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAP kinase activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transduction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
embryonic morphogenesis5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of behavior5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of nitric-oxide synthase activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosol5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell division5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
ERK1 and ERK2 cascade5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase C signaling5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to temperature stimulus5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messenger5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmission5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
monoamine transportSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
lactationSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of smellSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
locomotory behaviorSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to iron ionSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine transportSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
adenohypophysis developmentSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to nicotineSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of multicellular organism growthSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of dopamine metabolic processSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to cocaineSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine biosynthetic processSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine catabolic processSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
cognitionSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine uptake involved in synaptic transmissionSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to cAMPSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine uptakeSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
prepulse inhibitionSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine uptakeSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
hyaloid vascular plexus regressionSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
amino acid transportSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine transportSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by hormonePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion homeostasisPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle contractionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion import across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of receptor internalizationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of translationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA metabolic processAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
P-body assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
stress granule assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA transportAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
lipid transportSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
nervous system developmentSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled opioid receptor signaling pathwaySigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of neuron apoptotic processSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein homotrimerizationSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (96)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
acetylcholine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine:sodium symporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine:sodium symporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
secondary active organic cation transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
pyrimidine nucleoside transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
putrescine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
quaternary ammonium group transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
toxin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
(R)-carnitine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
retinal dehydrogenase activityAldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)
prostaglandin H2 endoperoxidase reductase activityAldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)
allyl-alcohol dehydrogenase activityAldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)
glycerol dehydrogenase [NADP+] activityAldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)
all-trans-retinol dehydrogenase (NADP+) activityAldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)
amyloid-beta bindingAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
acetylcholinesterase activityAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cholinesterase activityAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
collagen bindingAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
hydrolase activityAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
serine hydrolase activityAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine bindingAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
laminin bindingAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
actin bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
alpha-tubulin bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
beta-tubulin bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAlpha-1D adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingAlpha-1D adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
alpha1-adrenergic receptor activityAlpha-1D adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Gq/11-coupled serotonin receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
protein binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
1-(4-iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)propan-2-amine binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
integrin bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
monoatomic cation channel activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin:sodium:chloride symporter activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
monoamine transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
antiporter activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
syntaxin-1 bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
cocaine bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
nitric-oxide synthase bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
actin filament bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
histamine receptor activityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter receptor activityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Gq/11-coupled serotonin receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G-protein alpha-subunit binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
GTPase activator activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
protein binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
protease bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
amine bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 2A bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
heterocyclic compound bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
inward rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
delayed rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
C3HC4-type RING finger domain bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
scaffold protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
epidermal growth factor receptor bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled opioid receptor activitySigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (64)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
lateral plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
presynapseSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
basement membraneAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
membraneAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
neuromuscular junctionAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
synaptic cleftAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
synapseAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
side of membraneAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell body membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
axonSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAlpha-1D adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAlpha-1D adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
synapse5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor complex5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
dendrite5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
endosome membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
endomembrane systemSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
membrane raftSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
synapseSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
serotonergic synapseSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
synapseSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synapseHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasm5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
synapse5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor complex5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
dendrite5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
virion membraneSpike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus
cytoplasmSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
axonSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodySodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
axon terminusSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
membrane raftSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopaminergic synapseSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
flotillin complexSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
axonSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell body membraneSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfacePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
inward rectifier potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
trans-Golgi networkAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
ribonucleoprotein complexAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear envelopeSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear inner membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear outer membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
lipid dropletSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic densitySigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
growth coneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic vesicleSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
anchoring junctionSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic density membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (289)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID309940Inhibition of NET-mediated norepinephrine-reuptake assessed as yohimbine induced mortality in mouse at 1.62 mM/kg, ip after 24 hrs2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Synthesis of some tropane derivatives of anticipated activity on the reuptake of norepinephrine and/or serotonin.
AID471630Inhibition of [3H]5-HT reuptake at rat SERT expressed in HEK293 cells after 2 mins by liquid scintillation counting2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 44, Issue:12
Synthesis and serotonin transporter activity of sulphur-substituted alpha-alkyl phenethylamines as a new class of anticancer agents.
AID1220557Fraction unbound in Hartley guinea pig brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID1220559Fraction unbound in cynomolgus monkey brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID230538Relative binding affinity for serotonin and dopamine transporters2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, radiosynthesis, and biological evaluation of carbon-11 and iodine-123 labeled 2beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-[4'-((Z)-2-haloethenyl)phenyl]tropanes: candidate radioligands for in vivo imaging of the serotonin transporter.
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1220555Fraction unbound in Sprague-Dawley rat brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID132117Tested in vivo for head twitches antagonizing activity in mice1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Pyrroloisoquinoline antidepressants. 3. A focus on serotonin.
AID1718178Inhibition of SERT (unknown origin)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Small Molecules Selectively Targeting Sigma-1 Receptor for the Treatment of Neurological Diseases.
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID361596Displacement of [3H]paroxetine from human SERT expressed in HEK293 cells2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-15, Volume: 18, Issue:16
3-(4-(6-Fluoroalkoxy-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline-2(1H)-yl)cyclohexyl)-1H-indole-5-carbonitriles for SERT imaging: chemical synthesis, evaluation in vitro and radiofluorination.
AID1220560Fraction unbound in human occipital cortex at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID714086Increase in DOPAC level in Sprague-Dawley rat striatum at 25 umol/kg, sc by HPLC analysis relative to saline-treated control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 55, Issue:22
Systematic in vivo screening of a series of 1-propyl-4-arylpiperidines against dopaminergic and serotonergic properties in rat brain: a scaffold-jumping approach.
AID29811Oral bioavailability in human2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID540214Clearance in rat after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID112283Antagonistic activity against tetrabenazine-induced ptosis in mice1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 28, Issue:12
3-Phenyl-1-indanamines. Potential antidepressant activity and potent inhibition of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin uptake.
AID714091Reduction in spontaneous locomotor activity in Sprague-Dawley rat at 25 umol/kg, sc measured after 15 to 60 mins relative to saline-treated control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 55, Issue:22
Systematic in vivo screening of a series of 1-propyl-4-arylpiperidines against dopaminergic and serotonergic properties in rat brain: a scaffold-jumping approach.
AID309946Inhibition of NET-mediated norepinephrine-reuptake assessed as yohimbine induced mortality in mouse at 19.42 mM/kg, ip after 24 hrs2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Synthesis of some tropane derivatives of anticipated activity on the reuptake of norepinephrine and/or serotonin.
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID1458667Anxiolytic-like activity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as suppression of movement administered for 30 mins by four-plate test2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-14, Volume: 60, Issue:17
Novel 3-(1,2,3,6-Tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)-1H-indole-Based Multifunctional Ligands with Antipsychotic-Like, Mood-Modulating, and Procognitive Activity.
AID311933Inhibition of ASM in rat PC12 cells assessed as residual activity at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-24, Volume: 51, Issue:2
Identification of new functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase using a structure-property-activity relation model.
AID309937Inhibition of SERT-mediated serotonin-reuptake assessed as 5-hydroxytryptophan induced mouse head twitch at 6.47 mM/kg, ip after 20 mins2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Synthesis of some tropane derivatives of anticipated activity on the reuptake of norepinephrine and/or serotonin.
AID26362Ionization constant (pKa)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID161281Inhibition of human Potassium channel HERG expressed in mammalian cells2003Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-18, Volume: 13, Issue:16
Prediction of hERG potassium channel affinity by traditional and hologram qSAR methods.
AID499950Selectivity ratio of Ki for NET in rat brain frontal cortex to Ki for SERT in rat brain stem2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-26, Volume: 53, Issue:16
Structure-activity relationships for a novel series of citalopram (1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran-5-carbonitrile) analogues at monoamine transporters.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID588208Literature-mined public compounds from Lowe et al phospholipidosis modelling dataset2010Molecular pharmaceutics, Oct-04, Volume: 7, Issue:5
Predicting phospholipidosis using machine learning.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1269157Antidepressant-like activity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as reduction in immobility time at 1.25 mg/kg, ip dosed 30 mins before test measured after 6 mins by forced swim test2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 24, Issue:2
N-Alkylated arylsulfonamides of (aryloxy)ethyl piperidines: 5-HT(7) receptor selectivity versus multireceptor profile.
AID539464Solubility of the compound in 0.1 M phosphate buffer at 600 uM at pH 7.4 after 24 hrs by LC/MS/MS analysis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 20, Issue:24
Experimental solubility profiling of marketed CNS drugs, exploring solubility limit of CNS discovery candidate.
AID1274950Antidepressant activity in C57BL/6J mouse assessed as average force at 10 mg/kg, ip measured over 6 mins by tail suspension test (Rvb = 0.281 +/- 0.018 to 0.359 +/- 0.027 N)2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 108Towards new 5-HT7 antagonists among arylsulfonamide derivatives of (aryloxy)ethyl-alkyl amines: Multiobjective based design, synthesis, and antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
AID1274957Antidepressant activity in C57BL/6J mouse assessed as number of events at 10 mg/kg, ip measured over 6 mins by tail suspension test (Rvb = 1325.1 +/- 77.8 to 1773.4 +/- 109.9 No_unit)2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 108Towards new 5-HT7 antagonists among arylsulfonamide derivatives of (aryloxy)ethyl-alkyl amines: Multiobjective based design, synthesis, and antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
AID309938Inhibition of SERT-mediated serotonin-reuptake assessed as 5-hydroxytryptophan induced mouse head twitch at 12.94 mM/kg, ip after 20 mins2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Synthesis of some tropane derivatives of anticipated activity on the reuptake of norepinephrine and/or serotonin.
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID1274951Antidepressant activity in C57BL/6J mouse assessed as average force at 20 mg/kg, ip measured over 6 mins by tail suspension test (Rvb = 0.281 +/- 0.018 to 0.359 +/- 0.027 N)2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 108Towards new 5-HT7 antagonists among arylsulfonamide derivatives of (aryloxy)ethyl-alkyl amines: Multiobjective based design, synthesis, and antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
AID8002Observed volume of distribution2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID204703Inhibition of [3H]citalopram binding to Serotonin transporter of rat cerebral cortex2000Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-17, Volume: 10, Issue:14
Syntheses and binding affinities of 6-nitroquipazine analogues for serotonin transporter. Part 1.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1552842Antidepressant activity in ip dosed C57BL6/J mouse as total time of immobile by tail suspension test relative to control2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-15, Volume: 29, Issue:18
Further exploration of an N-aryl phenoxyethoxy pyridinone-based series of mGlu
AID1209418AUC(0 to infinity) in Sprague-Dawley rat brain at 10 mg/kg, sc by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Nov, Volume: 40, Issue:11
An evaluation of using rat-derived single-dose neuropharmacokinetic parameters to project accurately large animal unbound brain drug concentrations.
AID408340Inhibition of human ERG expressed in CHO cells by whole cell patch clamp technique2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 16, Issue:11
Support vector machines classification of hERG liabilities based on atom types.
AID643383Induction of phospholipidosis in bovine corneal fibroblasts assessed as lamellar inclusion bodies after 72 hrs by light microscopy2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-12, Volume: 55, Issue:1
In silico assay for assessing phospholipidosis potential of small druglike molecules: training, validation, and refinement using several data sets.
AID239085Displacement of [3H]GBR-12935 from dopamine transporter of rat caudate-putamen2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 15, Issue:4
Synthesis and monoamine transporter affinity of new 2beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-[4-(substituted thiophenyl)]phenyltropanes: discovery of a selective SERT antagonist with picomolar potency.
AID1824583Inhibition of SERT (unknown origin) in HEK293 cells assessed as inhibition of 5-HT reuptake by spectrophotometric analysis2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-05, Volume: 229The novel therapeutic strategy of vilazodone-donepezil chimeras as potent triple-target ligands for the potential treatment of Alzheimer's disease with comorbid depression.
AID1209350Ratio of unbound brain concentration to drug level in cerebrospinal fluid in Sprague-Dawley rat at 10 mg/kg, sc by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Nov, Volume: 40, Issue:11
An evaluation of using rat-derived single-dose neuropharmacokinetic parameters to project accurately large animal unbound brain drug concentrations.
AID408801Displacement of [3H]citalopram from human SERT expressed in HEK293 cells2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-15, Volume: 16, Issue:12
Carbon-11 labeled indolylpropylamine analog as a new potential PET agent for imaging of the serotonin transporter.
AID576612Inhibition of human ERG2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 46, Issue:2
Predicting hERG activities of compounds from their 3D structures: development and evaluation of a global descriptors based QSAR model.
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID239125Displacement of [3H]paroxetine from serotonin transporter of rat cerebral cortex2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 15, Issue:4
Synthesis and monoamine transporter affinity of new 2beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-[4-(substituted thiophenyl)]phenyltropanes: discovery of a selective SERT antagonist with picomolar potency.
AID64517In vitro binding affinity against human dopamine transporter in dog kidney cell line by using [125I]RTI-55 radioligand2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, radiosynthesis, and biological evaluation of carbon-11 and iodine-123 labeled 2beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-[4'-((Z)-2-haloethenyl)phenyl]tropanes: candidate radioligands for in vivo imaging of the serotonin transporter.
AID1552839Anti-anxiety activity in C57BL/6J mouse assessed as increase in total time spent in open arms at 15 mg/kg, ip treated for 15 mins by elevated zero maze assay2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-15, Volume: 29, Issue:18
Further exploration of an N-aryl phenoxyethoxy pyridinone-based series of mGlu
AID444058Volume of distribution at steady state in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1718165Displacement of [3H]-(+)-pentazocine from sigma 1 receptor in Sprague-Dawley rat brain membranes by scintillation counting method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Small Molecules Selectively Targeting Sigma-1 Receptor for the Treatment of Neurological Diseases.
AID411793Metabolic stability in human liver microsomes assessed as intrinsic clearance per mg of protein2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-22, Volume: 52, Issue:2
Metabolic soft spot identification and compound optimization in early discovery phases using MetaSite and LC-MS/MS validation.
AID179081Inhibition of noradrenaline uptake in rat synaptosomal fraction1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 28, Issue:12
3-Phenyl-1-indanamines. Potential antidepressant activity and potent inhibition of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin uptake.
AID1274945Toxicity in ip dosed C57BL/6J mouse assessed as effect on spontaneous locomotory activity at MED measured over 1 min 15 secs2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 108Towards new 5-HT7 antagonists among arylsulfonamide derivatives of (aryloxy)ethyl-alkyl amines: Multiobjective based design, synthesis, and antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID29359Ionization constant (pKa)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID1274968Antidepressant activity in ip dosed albino Swiss mouse assessed as decrease in immobility time by forced swim test2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 108Towards new 5-HT7 antagonists among arylsulfonamide derivatives of (aryloxy)ethyl-alkyl amines: Multiobjective based design, synthesis, and antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
AID1269159Toxicity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as effect on spontaneous locomotor activity at 1.25 mg/kg, ip dosed 30 mins before test measured after 2 to 6 mins2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 24, Issue:2
N-Alkylated arylsulfonamides of (aryloxy)ethyl piperidines: 5-HT(7) receptor selectivity versus multireceptor profile.
AID540217Volume of distribution at steady state in dog after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID309935Inhibition of SERT-mediated serotonin-reuptake assessed as 5-hydroxytryptophan induced mouse head twitch at 3.24 mM/kg, ip after 20 mins2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Synthesis of some tropane derivatives of anticipated activity on the reuptake of norepinephrine and/or serotonin.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1738337Cytotoxicity against human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 198Synthesis, in vitro evaluation and molecular docking of a new class of indolylpropyl benzamidopiperazines as dual AChE and SERT ligands for Alzheimer's disease.
AID134217Tested in vitro for serotonin(5-HT) neuronal uptake inhibition1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Pyrroloisoquinoline antidepressants. 3. A focus on serotonin.
AID1274940Antidepressant activity in ip dosed C57BL/6J mouse assessed as reduction in immobility time of mouse by tail suspension test2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 108Towards new 5-HT7 antagonists among arylsulfonamide derivatives of (aryloxy)ethyl-alkyl amines: Multiobjective based design, synthesis, and antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
AID395324Lipophilicity, log D at pH 7.4 by liquid chromatography2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 52, Issue:6
Relationship between brain tissue partitioning and microemulsion retention factors of CNS drugs.
AID781328pKa (acid-base dissociation constant) as determined by Luan ref: Pharm. Res. 20052014Pharmaceutical research, Apr, Volume: 31, Issue:4
Comparison of the accuracy of experimental and predicted pKa values of basic and acidic compounds.
AID499949Displacement of [3H]WIN-35428 from DAT in rat caudate-putamen by scintillation counting2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-26, Volume: 53, Issue:16
Structure-activity relationships for a novel series of citalopram (1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran-5-carbonitrile) analogues at monoamine transporters.
AID1659263Antagonist activity at SERT receptor (unknown origin) by fluorescence based assay2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 04-15, Volume: 30, Issue:8
Synthesis and biological investigation of triazolopyridinone derivatives as potential multireceptor atypical antipsychotics.
AID134216Tested in vitro for norepinephrine (NE) neuronal uptake inhibition1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Pyrroloisoquinoline antidepressants. 3. A focus on serotonin.
AID1274942Anxiolytic activity in ip dosed albino Swiss mouse assessed as increase in number of shocks accepted measured over 1 min, 15 secs by four plates test2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 108Towards new 5-HT7 antagonists among arylsulfonamide derivatives of (aryloxy)ethyl-alkyl amines: Multiobjective based design, synthesis, and antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
AID243151Inhibitory concentration against potassium channel HERG2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-02, Volume: 15, Issue:11
A discriminant model constructed by the support vector machine method for HERG potassium channel inhibitors.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID309936Inhibition of SERT-mediated serotonin-reuptake assessed as 5-hydroxytryptophan induced mouse head twitch at 4.86 mM/kg, ip after 20 mins2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Synthesis of some tropane derivatives of anticipated activity on the reuptake of norepinephrine and/or serotonin.
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID408252Inhibition of [3H]dopamine reuptake at human NET expressed in african green monkey COS7 cells at 100 nM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-22, Volume: 51, Issue:10
From the selective serotonin transporter inhibitor citalopram to the selective norepinephrine transporter inhibitor talopram: synthesis and structure-activity relationship studies.
AID309950Selectivity ratio of ED50 for 5-HT reuptake in mouse to ED50 for norepinephrine reuptake in mouse2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Synthesis of some tropane derivatives of anticipated activity on the reuptake of norepinephrine and/or serotonin.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID540231Dose normalised AUC in dog after po administration2005Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems, Feb, Volume: 35, Issue:2
Comparative evaluation of oral systemic exposure of 56 xenobiotics in rat, dog, monkey and human.
AID1434655Inhibition of [3H]-S-citalopram dissociation from SERT allosteric modulator site (S2) (unknown origin) expressed in African green monkey COS1 cell membranes by scintillation counting method2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 02-01, Volume: 27, Issue:3
X-ray structure based evaluation of analogs of citalopram: Compounds with increased affinity and selectivity compared with R-citalopram for the allosteric site (S2) on hSERT.
AID309941Inhibition of NET-mediated norepinephrine-reuptake assessed as yohimbine induced mortality in mouse at 3.24 mM/kg, ip after 24 hrs2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Synthesis of some tropane derivatives of anticipated activity on the reuptake of norepinephrine and/or serotonin.
AID499948Displacement of [3H]nisoxetine from NET in rat frontal cortex by scintillation counting2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-26, Volume: 53, Issue:16
Structure-activity relationships for a novel series of citalopram (1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran-5-carbonitrile) analogues at monoamine transporters.
AID712521Displacement of [3H]5-carboxamidotryptamine to human 5HT1A expressed in HEK293 cells by filter binding assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-12, Volume: 54, Issue:9
Discovery of 1-[2-(2,4-dimethylphenylsulfanyl)phenyl]piperazine (Lu AA21004): a novel multimodal compound for the treatment of major depressive disorder.
AID588210Human drug-induced liver injury (DILI) modelling dataset from Ekins et al2010Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Dec, Volume: 38, Issue:12
A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.
AID179069Inhibition of 5-HT uptake in rat synaptosomal fraction1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 28, Issue:12
3-Phenyl-1-indanamines. Potential antidepressant activity and potent inhibition of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin uptake.
AID7783Unbound fraction (plasma)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID540218Clearance in monkey after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1274943Toxicity in ip dosed C57BL/6J mouse assessed as effect on spontaneous locomotory activity at MED measured over 6 mins2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 108Towards new 5-HT7 antagonists among arylsulfonamide derivatives of (aryloxy)ethyl-alkyl amines: Multiobjective based design, synthesis, and antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
AID1274941Antidepressant activity in ip dosed Wistar rat assessed as reduction in immobility time of rat by forced swim test2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 108Towards new 5-HT7 antagonists among arylsulfonamide derivatives of (aryloxy)ethyl-alkyl amines: Multiobjective based design, synthesis, and antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
AID309948Inhibition of SERT-mediated serotonin-reuptake assessed as 5-hydroxytryptophan induced intraperitoneally dosed mouse head twitch after 20 mins2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Synthesis of some tropane derivatives of anticipated activity on the reuptake of norepinephrine and/or serotonin.
AID540233Dose normalised AUC in human after po administration2005Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems, Feb, Volume: 35, Issue:2
Comparative evaluation of oral systemic exposure of 56 xenobiotics in rat, dog, monkey and human.
AID540232Dose normalised AUC in monkey after po administration2005Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems, Feb, Volume: 35, Issue:2
Comparative evaluation of oral systemic exposure of 56 xenobiotics in rat, dog, monkey and human.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID444051Total clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID496819Antimicrobial activity against Plasmodium falciparum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1207630Inhibition of L-type calcium channel measured using whole-cell patch clamp in rat ventricular myocytes2012Journal of applied toxicology : JAT, Oct, Volume: 32, Issue:10
Predictive model for L-type channel inhibition: multichannel block in QT prolongation risk assessment.
AID298031Lipophilicity, log D at pH7.42007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-20, Volume: 50, Issue:19
High-throughput screening of drug-brain tissue binding and in silico prediction for assessment of central nervous system drug delivery.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1274964Antidepressant activity in C57BL/6J mouse assessed as immobility time at 10 mg/kg, ip measured over 6 mins by tail suspension test (Rvb = 160.7 +/- 12 to 170.6 +/- 9 sec)2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 108Towards new 5-HT7 antagonists among arylsulfonamide derivatives of (aryloxy)ethyl-alkyl amines: Multiobjective based design, synthesis, and antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
AID1434650Selectivity ratio of EC50 for inhibition of [3H]-S-citalopram dissociation from SERT allosteric modulator site (S2) (unknown origin) expressed in African green monkey COS1 cell membranes to IC50 for [3H]5-HT uptake by SERT primary site (S1) (unknown origi2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 02-01, Volume: 27, Issue:3
X-ray structure based evaluation of analogs of citalopram: Compounds with increased affinity and selectivity compared with R-citalopram for the allosteric site (S2) on hSERT.
AID1209410AUC(0 to 7 hrs) in Sprague-Dawley rat brain at 10 mg/kg, sc by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Nov, Volume: 40, Issue:11
An evaluation of using rat-derived single-dose neuropharmacokinetic parameters to project accurately large animal unbound brain drug concentrations.
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID688847Octanol-phosphate buffered saline partition coefficient, log K of the compound2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 21, Issue:24
Fluorescent reporters of monoamine transporter distribution and function.
AID1274952Antidepressant activity in C57BL/6J mouse assessed as average force at 40 mg/kg, ip measured over 6 mins by tail suspension test (Rvb = 0.281 +/- 0.018 to 0.359 +/- 0.027 N)2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 108Towards new 5-HT7 antagonists among arylsulfonamide derivatives of (aryloxy)ethyl-alkyl amines: Multiobjective based design, synthesis, and antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID309934Inhibition of SERT-mediated serotonin-reuptake assessed as 5-hydroxytryptophan induced mouse head twitch at 1.62 mM/kg, ip after 20 mins2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Synthesis of some tropane derivatives of anticipated activity on the reuptake of norepinephrine and/or serotonin.
AID395327Dissociation constant, pKa by capillary electrophoresis2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 52, Issue:6
Relationship between brain tissue partitioning and microemulsion retention factors of CNS drugs.
AID298032Acid dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-20, Volume: 50, Issue:19
High-throughput screening of drug-brain tissue binding and in silico prediction for assessment of central nervous system drug delivery.
AID723164Antidepressant activity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as reduction of immobility time at 1.25 mg/kg, ip measured during last 4 mins of a 6 mins test session by forced swim test2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Antidepressant and antipsychotic activity of new quinoline- and isoquinoline-sulfonamide analogs of aripiprazole targeting serotonin 5-HT₁A/5-HT₂A/5-HT₇ and dopamine D₂/D₃ receptors.
AID731396Inhibition of [3H]dopamine uptake at human NET expressed in COS7 cells after 5 mins by beta-counting2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-01, Volume: 23, Issue:1
A rhodamine-labeled citalopram analogue as a high-affinity fluorescent probe for the serotonin transporter.
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID681144TP_TRANSPORTER: cell accumulation of calcein in L-MDR1 cells2003The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Apr, Volume: 305, Issue:1
Inhibition of P-glycoprotein by newer antidepressants.
AID731394Inhibition of [3H]dopamine uptake at human DAT expressed in COS7 cells after 3 mins by beta-counting2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-01, Volume: 23, Issue:1
A rhodamine-labeled citalopram analogue as a high-affinity fluorescent probe for the serotonin transporter.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID309939Inhibition of SERT-mediated serotonin-reuptake assessed as 5-hydroxytryptophan induced mouse head twitch at 25.89 mM/kg, ip after 20 mins2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Synthesis of some tropane derivatives of anticipated activity on the reuptake of norepinephrine and/or serotonin.
AID499947Displacement of [3H]citalopram from SERT in rat brain stem by scintillation counting2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-26, Volume: 53, Issue:16
Structure-activity relationships for a novel series of citalopram (1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran-5-carbonitrile) analogues at monoamine transporters.
AID1209377AUC(0 to 7 hrs) in Sprague-Dawley rat plasma at 10 mg/kg, sc by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Nov, Volume: 40, Issue:11
An evaluation of using rat-derived single-dose neuropharmacokinetic parameters to project accurately large animal unbound brain drug concentrations.
AID50341Maximal activatory effect against human carbonic anhydrase I (hCA I)2003Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-18, Volume: 13, Issue:16
Carbonic anhydrase activators. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors fluoxetine, sertraline and citalopram are strong activators of isozymes I and II.
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID425652Total body clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID540221Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID386623Inhibition of 4-(4-(dimethylamino)styryl)-N-methylpyridinium uptake at human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells at 100 uM by confocal microscopy2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 51, Issue:19
Structural requirements for drug inhibition of the liver specific human organic cation transport protein 1.
AID1059389Displacement of [3H]paroxetine from SERT in rat cortical membranes after 6 mins by liquid scintillation counting2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 21, Issue:24
Synthesis, docking and pharmacological evaluation of novel homo- and hetero-bis 3-piperazinylpropylindole derivatives at SERT and 5-HT1A receptor.
AID50343Maximal activatory effect against human carbonic anhydrase I (hCA I) at a concentration of 1 uM2003Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-18, Volume: 13, Issue:16
Carbonic anhydrase activators. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors fluoxetine, sertraline and citalopram are strong activators of isozymes I and II.
AID714081Decrease in 5-HIAA level in Sprague-Dawley rat striatum at 25 umol/kg, sc by HPLC analysis relative to saline-treated control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 55, Issue:22
Systematic in vivo screening of a series of 1-propyl-4-arylpiperidines against dopaminergic and serotonergic properties in rat brain: a scaffold-jumping approach.
AID1552838Anti-anxiety activity in C57BL/6J mouse assessed as increase in total number of open arm entries at 15 mg/kg, ip treated for 15 mins by elevated zero maze assay2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-15, Volume: 29, Issue:18
Further exploration of an N-aryl phenoxyethoxy pyridinone-based series of mGlu
AID576813Inhibition of [3H]-serotonin reuptake at human SERT expressed in HEK293 cells after 15 to 20 mins by fluorescence neurotransmitter transporter assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 19, Issue:3
Synthesis and serotonin transporter activity of 1,3-bis(aryl)-2-nitro-1-propenes as a new class of anticancer agents.
AID179076Inhibition of dopamine uptake in rat synaptosomal fraction1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 28, Issue:12
3-Phenyl-1-indanamines. Potential antidepressant activity and potent inhibition of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin uptake.
AID1274965Antidepressant activity in C57BL/6J mouse assessed as immobility time at 20 mg/kg, ip measured over 6 mins by tail suspension test (Rvb = 160.7 +/- 12 to 170.6 +/- 9 sec)2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 108Towards new 5-HT7 antagonists among arylsulfonamide derivatives of (aryloxy)ethyl-alkyl amines: Multiobjective based design, synthesis, and antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
AID499951Selectivity ratio of Ki for DAT in rat caudate-putamen to Ki for SERT in rat brain stem2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-26, Volume: 53, Issue:16
Structure-activity relationships for a novel series of citalopram (1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran-5-carbonitrile) analogues at monoamine transporters.
AID1783170Inhibition of human wild type SERT expressed in COS7 cells assessed as inhibition of [3H]5HT uptake measured for 40 hrs by scintillation counting analysis2021European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-05, Volume: 220Tuning the activity of known drugs via the introduction of halogen atoms, a case study of SERT ligands - Fluoxetine and fluvoxamine.
AID1718151Displacement of [3H]DTG from sigma 2 receptor in Sprague-Dawley rat brain membranes in presence of (+)-pentazocine by scintillation counting method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Small Molecules Selectively Targeting Sigma-1 Receptor for the Treatment of Neurological Diseases.
AID204199Inhibition of [125I]RTI-55 binding to human serotonin transporter expressed in human embryonic kidney cells2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, radiosynthesis, and biological evaluation of carbon-11 and iodine-123 labeled 2beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-[4'-((Z)-2-haloethenyl)phenyl]tropanes: candidate radioligands for in vivo imaging of the serotonin transporter.
AID1458659Antidepressant activity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as decrease in immobility time administered for 30 mins measured last 4 mins of 6 mins test by forced swimming test2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-14, Volume: 60, Issue:17
Novel 3-(1,2,3,6-Tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)-1H-indole-Based Multifunctional Ligands with Antipsychotic-Like, Mood-Modulating, and Procognitive Activity.
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID1274944Toxicity in ip dosed Wistar rat assessed as effect on spontaneous locomotory activity at MED measured over 2 to 6 mins2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 108Towards new 5-HT7 antagonists among arylsulfonamide derivatives of (aryloxy)ethyl-alkyl amines: Multiobjective based design, synthesis, and antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
AID4411Binding affinity of a compound to rat brain 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A (serotonin) receptor assayed by radiolabeled [3H]-8-OH-DPAT ligand displacement1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Binding of arylpiperazines, (aryloxy)propanolamines, and tetrahydropyridylindoles to the 5-HT1A receptor: contribution of the molecular lipophilicity potential to three-dimensional quantitative structure-affinity relationship models.
AID309942Inhibition of NET-mediated norepinephrine-reuptake assessed as yohimbine induced mortality in mouse at 4.86 mM/kg, ip after 24 hrs2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Synthesis of some tropane derivatives of anticipated activity on the reuptake of norepinephrine and/or serotonin.
AID1738334Inhibition of human plasma AChE using acetylthiocholine iodide as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition and measured after 10 mins by Ellman's method2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 198Synthesis, in vitro evaluation and molecular docking of a new class of indolylpropyl benzamidopiperazines as dual AChE and SERT ligands for Alzheimer's disease.
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID1209386AUC(0 to infinity) in Sprague-Dawley rat plasma at 10 mg/kg, sc by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Nov, Volume: 40, Issue:11
An evaluation of using rat-derived single-dose neuropharmacokinetic parameters to project accurately large animal unbound brain drug concentrations.
AID243060Selectivity for inhibition of serotonin and dopamine transporters2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 15, Issue:4
Synthesis and monoamine transporter affinity of new 2beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-[4-(substituted thiophenyl)]phenyltropanes: discovery of a selective SERT antagonist with picomolar potency.
AID112281Compound was tested for antagonistic activity against 5-HTP-induced potentiation in mice1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 28, Issue:12
3-Phenyl-1-indanamines. Potential antidepressant activity and potent inhibition of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin uptake.
AID28681Partition coefficient (logD6.5)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID588209Literature-mined public compounds from Greene et al multi-species hepatotoxicity modelling dataset2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jul-19, Volume: 23, Issue:7
Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
AID243422log (1/Km) value for human liver microsome cytochrome P450 3A42005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-15, Volume: 15, Issue:18
Modeling K(m) values using electrotopological state: substrates for cytochrome P450 3A4-mediated metabolism.
AID1209334Ratio of drug level in brain to plasma in Sprague-Dawley rat at 10 mg/kg, sc by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Nov, Volume: 40, Issue:11
An evaluation of using rat-derived single-dose neuropharmacokinetic parameters to project accurately large animal unbound brain drug concentrations.
AID1220558Fraction unbound in Beagle dog brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID361595Displacement of [3H]citalopram from human SERT expressed in HEK293 cells2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-15, Volume: 18, Issue:16
3-(4-(6-Fluoroalkoxy-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline-2(1H)-yl)cyclohexyl)-1H-indole-5-carbonitriles for SERT imaging: chemical synthesis, evaluation in vitro and radiofluorination.
AID243077Selectivity for inhibition of serotonin and norepinephrine transporters2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 15, Issue:4
Synthesis and monoamine transporter affinity of new 2beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-[4-(substituted thiophenyl)]phenyltropanes: discovery of a selective SERT antagonist with picomolar potency.
AID540219Volume of distribution at steady state in monkey after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID1738335Displacement of [3H]paroxetine from human SERT expressed in human HEK293 cells incubated for 30 mins by liquid scintillation counting analysis2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 198Synthesis, in vitro evaluation and molecular docking of a new class of indolylpropyl benzamidopiperazines as dual AChE and SERT ligands for Alzheimer's disease.
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID395325Lipophilicity, log P by microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 52, Issue:6
Relationship between brain tissue partitioning and microemulsion retention factors of CNS drugs.
AID491771Potentiation of 5-hydroxytryptophan-induced stereotypic behavior in mouse at 10 mg/kg, po administered 2 hrs before 5-hydroxytryptophan challenge measured for 30 mins2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-08, Volume: 53, Issue:13
6-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-[(methyloxy)methyl]-3-azabicyclo[4.1.0]heptane: a new potent and selective triple reuptake inhibitor.
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID1453904Antidepressant-like activity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as decrease in immobility time at 1.25 mg/kg, ip for 30 mins measured last 4 mins of 6 mins test by forced swim test relative to control
AID588220Literature-mined public compounds from Kruhlak et al phospholipidosis modelling dataset2008Toxicology mechanisms and methods, , Volume: 18, Issue:2-3
Development of a phospholipidosis database and predictive quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models.
AID1495956Inhibition of SERT (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in 5-HT uptake incubated for 30 mins2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-23, Volume: 26, Issue:12
Design, synthesis and evaluation of vilazodone-tacrine hybrids as multitarget-directed ligands against depression with cognitive impairment.
AID444055Fraction absorbed in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID147725In vitro binding affinity against human norepinephrine transporter in human embryonic kidney cell line by using [3H]-nisoxatine radioligand2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, radiosynthesis, and biological evaluation of carbon-11 and iodine-123 labeled 2beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-[4'-((Z)-2-haloethenyl)phenyl]tropanes: candidate radioligands for in vivo imaging of the serotonin transporter.
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID1220554Fraction unbound in Wistar Han rat brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID309947Inhibition of NET-mediated norepinephrine-reuptake assessed as yohimbine induced mortality in mouse at 25.89 mM/kg, ip after 24 hrs2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Synthesis of some tropane derivatives of anticipated activity on the reuptake of norepinephrine and/or serotonin.
AID1434653Inhibition of [3H]5-HT uptake by SERT primary site (S1) (unknown origin) expressed in African green monkey COS1 cells after 10 mins by TopCount scintillation counting method2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 02-01, Volume: 27, Issue:3
X-ray structure based evaluation of analogs of citalopram: Compounds with increased affinity and selectivity compared with R-citalopram for the allosteric site (S2) on hSERT.
AID462725Potentiation of 5-hydroxytryptophan-induced stereotpic behavior in CD1 mouse at 10 mg/kg, po administered 120 mins before 5HTP challenge measured for 30 mins2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-25, Volume: 53, Issue:6
1-(Aryl)-6-[alkoxyalkyl]-3-azabicyclo[3.1.0]hexanes and 6-(aryl)-6-[alkoxyalkyl]-3-azabicyclo[3.1.0]hexanes: a new series of potent and selective triple reuptake inhibitors.
AID425653Renal clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID1458668Toxicity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as effect on spontaneous locomotory activity measuring number of areas crossed administered for 30 mins measured every 2 mins up to 6 mins2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-14, Volume: 60, Issue:17
Novel 3-(1,2,3,6-Tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)-1H-indole-Based Multifunctional Ligands with Antipsychotic-Like, Mood-Modulating, and Procognitive Activity.
AID540216Clearance in dog after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID1220556Fraction unbound in CD-1 mouse brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID1209342Ratio of drug level in cerebrospinal fluid to unbound plasma concentration in Sprague-Dawley rat at 10 mg/kg, sc by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Nov, Volume: 40, Issue:11
An evaluation of using rat-derived single-dose neuropharmacokinetic parameters to project accurately large animal unbound brain drug concentrations.
AID576805Cytotoxicity against human chemoresistant DG75 cells expressing SERT assessed as decrease in cell viability 10 or 50 uM after 72 hrs Alamar blue assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 19, Issue:3
Synthesis and serotonin transporter activity of 1,3-bis(aryl)-2-nitro-1-propenes as a new class of anticancer agents.
AID540237Phospholipidosis-positive literature compound observed in rat
AID179990Tested in vivo for serotonin syndrome antagonizing activity in rat1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Pyrroloisoquinoline antidepressants. 3. A focus on serotonin.
AID1129361Unbound fraction in HEK293 cell homogenate at 0.1 uM by equilibrium dialysis based UPLC-MS/MS analysis2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-10, Volume: 57, Issue:7
A high-throughput cell-based method to predict the unbound drug fraction in the brain.
AID444053Renal clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1209394AUC(0 to 7 hrs) in Sprague-Dawley rat cerebrospinal fluid at 10 mg/kg, sc by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Nov, Volume: 40, Issue:11
An evaluation of using rat-derived single-dose neuropharmacokinetic parameters to project accurately large animal unbound brain drug concentrations.
AID1458670Toxicity in CD-1 mouse assessed as effect on spontaneous locomotory activity by measuring number of areas crossed administered for 30 mins measured every 1 min for first 5 mins2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-14, Volume: 60, Issue:17
Novel 3-(1,2,3,6-Tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)-1H-indole-Based Multifunctional Ligands with Antipsychotic-Like, Mood-Modulating, and Procognitive Activity.
AID1054122Inhibition of human ERG2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 56, Issue:22
Polypharmacology - foe or friend?
AID1274970Toxicity in ip dosed albino Swiss mouse assessed as effect on spontaneous locomotory activity at MED measured over 2 to 6 mins2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 108Towards new 5-HT7 antagonists among arylsulfonamide derivatives of (aryloxy)ethyl-alkyl amines: Multiobjective based design, synthesis, and antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1058858Inhibition of SERT (unknown origin) assessed as inhibition of serotonin uptake2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-12, Volume: 56, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of 1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran-5-carbonitrile (citalopram) analogues as novel probes for the serotonin transporter S1 and S2 binding sites.
AID408802Displacement of [3H]paroxetine from human SERT expressed in HEK293 cells2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-15, Volume: 16, Issue:12
Carbon-11 labeled indolylpropylamine analog as a new potential PET agent for imaging of the serotonin transporter.
AID444052Hepatic clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1738336Cytotoxicity against human HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 198Synthesis, in vitro evaluation and molecular docking of a new class of indolylpropyl benzamidopiperazines as dual AChE and SERT ligands for Alzheimer's disease.
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID1274958Antidepressant activity in C57BL/6J mouse assessed as number of events at 20 mg/kg, ip measured over 6 mins by tail suspension test (Rvb = 1325.1 +/- 77.8 to 1773.4 +/- 109.9 No_unit)2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 108Towards new 5-HT7 antagonists among arylsulfonamide derivatives of (aryloxy)ethyl-alkyl amines: Multiobjective based design, synthesis, and antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
AID444050Fraction unbound in human plasma2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1274966Antidepressant activity in C57BL/6J mouse assessed as immobility time at 40 mg/kg, ip measured over 6 mins by tail suspension test (Rvb = 160.7 +/- 12 to 170.6 +/- 9 sec)2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 108Towards new 5-HT7 antagonists among arylsulfonamide derivatives of (aryloxy)ethyl-alkyl amines: Multiobjective based design, synthesis, and antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID444056Fraction escaping gut-wall elimination in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID540215Volume of distribution at steady state in rat after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID714104Increase in DOPAC level in sc dosed Sprague-Dawley rat striatum by HPLC analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 55, Issue:22
Systematic in vivo screening of a series of 1-propyl-4-arylpiperidines against dopaminergic and serotonergic properties in rat brain: a scaffold-jumping approach.
AID309949Inhibition of NET-mediated norepinephrine-reuptake assessed as yohimbine induced mortality in intraperitoneally dosed mouse after 24 hrs2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Synthesis of some tropane derivatives of anticipated activity on the reuptake of norepinephrine and/or serotonin.
AID576815Inhibition of [3H]-serotonin reuptake at human SERT expressed in HEK293 cells at 1 uM after 15 to 20 mins by fluorescence neurotransmitter transporter assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 19, Issue:3
Synthesis and serotonin transporter activity of 1,3-bis(aryl)-2-nitro-1-propenes as a new class of anticancer agents.
AID723163Antidepressant activity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as reduction of immobility time at 2.5 mg/kg, ip measured during last 4 mins of a 6 mins test session by forced swim test2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Antidepressant and antipsychotic activity of new quinoline- and isoquinoline-sulfonamide analogs of aripiprazole targeting serotonin 5-HT₁A/5-HT₂A/5-HT₇ and dopamine D₂/D₃ receptors.
AID1274959Antidepressant activity in C57BL/6J mouse assessed as number of events at 40 mg/kg, ip measured over 6 mins by tail suspension test (Rvb = 1325.1 +/- 77.8 to 1773.4 +/- 109.9 No_unit)2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 108Towards new 5-HT7 antagonists among arylsulfonamide derivatives of (aryloxy)ethyl-alkyl amines: Multiobjective based design, synthesis, and antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID408251Inhibition of [3H]5-hydroxytryptamine reuptake at human SERT expressed in african green monkey COS7 cells at 100 nM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-22, Volume: 51, Issue:10
From the selective serotonin transporter inhibitor citalopram to the selective norepinephrine transporter inhibitor talopram: synthesis and structure-activity relationship studies.
AID311934Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-24, Volume: 51, Issue:2
Identification of new functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase using a structure-property-activity relation model.
AID239218Displacement of [3H]nisoxetine from norepinephrine transporter of rat cerebral cortex2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 15, Issue:4
Synthesis and monoamine transporter affinity of new 2beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-[4-(substituted thiophenyl)]phenyltropanes: discovery of a selective SERT antagonist with picomolar potency.
AID309944Inhibition of NET-mediated norepinephrine-reuptake assessed as yohimbine induced mortality in mouse at 9.71 mM/kg, ip after 24 hrs2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Synthesis of some tropane derivatives of anticipated activity on the reuptake of norepinephrine and/or serotonin.
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID576811Cytotoxicity against human HEK293 cells assessed as decrease in cell viability after 48 hrs neutral red dye assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 19, Issue:3
Synthesis and serotonin transporter activity of 1,3-bis(aryl)-2-nitro-1-propenes as a new class of anticancer agents.
AID576803Cytotoxicity against human SH-SY5Y cells expressing human SERT assessed as decrease in cell viability after 48 hrs neutral red dye assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 19, Issue:3
Synthesis and serotonin transporter activity of 1,3-bis(aryl)-2-nitro-1-propenes as a new class of anticancer agents.
AID1209402AUC(0 to infinity) in Sprague-Dawley rat cerebrospinal fluid at 10 mg/kg, sc by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Nov, Volume: 40, Issue:11
An evaluation of using rat-derived single-dose neuropharmacokinetic parameters to project accurately large animal unbound brain drug concentrations.
AID134215Tested in vitro for dopamine(DA) neuronal uptake inhibition1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Pyrroloisoquinoline antidepressants. 3. A focus on serotonin.
AID1059388Displacement of [3H]8-OH-DPAT from human 5-HT1A receptor expressed in HEK293 cells2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 21, Issue:24
Synthesis, docking and pharmacological evaluation of novel homo- and hetero-bis 3-piperazinylpropylindole derivatives at SERT and 5-HT1A receptor.
AID309943Inhibition of NET-mediated norepinephrine-reuptake assessed as yohimbine induced mortality in mouse at 6.47 mM/kg, ip after 24 hrs2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Synthesis of some tropane derivatives of anticipated activity on the reuptake of norepinephrine and/or serotonin.
AID444054Oral bioavailability in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1552840Anti-anxiety activity in C57BL/6J mouse assessed as reduction in number of marbles buried at 15 mg/kg, ip treated for 15 mins by marble burying assay2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-15, Volume: 29, Issue:18
Further exploration of an N-aryl phenoxyethoxy pyridinone-based series of mGlu
AID712520Inhibition of SERT-mediated [3H]5HT uptake in rat synaptosomes by scintillation counting2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-12, Volume: 54, Issue:9
Discovery of 1-[2-(2,4-dimethylphenylsulfanyl)phenyl]piperazine (Lu AA21004): a novel multimodal compound for the treatment of major depressive disorder.
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID576812Cytotoxicity against human HEK293 cells expressing human SERT assessed as decrease in cell viability after 48 hrs neutral red dye assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 19, Issue:3
Synthesis and serotonin transporter activity of 1,3-bis(aryl)-2-nitro-1-propenes as a new class of anticancer agents.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID444057Fraction escaping hepatic elimination in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID712522Displacement of [3H]granisetron from human 5HT3A receptor expressed in HEK293 cells by filter binding assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-12, Volume: 54, Issue:9
Discovery of 1-[2-(2,4-dimethylphenylsulfanyl)phenyl]piperazine (Lu AA21004): a novel multimodal compound for the treatment of major depressive disorder.
AID386625Inhibition of 4-(4-(dimethylamino)styryl)-N-methylpyridinium uptake at human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells by confocal microscopy2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 51, Issue:19
Structural requirements for drug inhibition of the liver specific human organic cation transport protein 1.
AID731395Inhibition of [3H]5-HT uptake at human SERT expressed in COS7 cells after 3 mins by beta-counting2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-01, Volume: 23, Issue:1
A rhodamine-labeled citalopram analogue as a high-affinity fluorescent probe for the serotonin transporter.
AID540230Dose normalised AUC in rat after po administration2005Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems, Feb, Volume: 35, Issue:2
Comparative evaluation of oral systemic exposure of 56 xenobiotics in rat, dog, monkey and human.
AID309945Inhibition of NET-mediated norepinephrine-reuptake assessed as yohimbine induced mortality in mouse at 12.94 mM/kg, ip after 24 hrs2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Synthesis of some tropane derivatives of anticipated activity on the reuptake of norepinephrine and/or serotonin.
AID27167Delta logD (logD6.5 - logD7.4)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID723165Antidepressant activity in Swiss albino mouse assessed as reduction of immobility time at 5 mg/kg, ip measured during last 4 mins of a 6 mins test session by forced swim test2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Antidepressant and antipsychotic activity of new quinoline- and isoquinoline-sulfonamide analogs of aripiprazole targeting serotonin 5-HT₁A/5-HT₂A/5-HT₇ and dopamine D₂/D₃ receptors.
AID540220Clearance in human after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID1209358Ratio of unbound drug level in brain to plasma in Sprague-Dawley rat at 10 mg/kg, sc by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Nov, Volume: 40, Issue:11
An evaluation of using rat-derived single-dose neuropharmacokinetic parameters to project accurately large animal unbound brain drug concentrations.
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347049Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot screen2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347050Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr2) antagonism - Pilot subtype selectivity assay2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347058CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - HTRF assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID588349qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation of Cytotoxic Assay
AID1347059CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - Alpha assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID504836Inducers of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response (ERSR) in human glioma: Validation2002The Journal of biological chemistry, Apr-19, Volume: 277, Issue:16
Sustained ER Ca2+ depletion suppresses protein synthesis and induces activation-enhanced cell death in mast cells.
AID1347045Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot counterscreen GloSensor control cell line2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID588378qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation
AID1347151Optimization of GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347057CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - LANCE assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1347405qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS LOPAC collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347410qHTS for inhibitors of adenylyl cyclases using a fission yeast platform: a pilot screen against the NCATS LOPAC library2019Cellular signalling, 08, Volume: 60A fission yeast platform for heterologous expression of mammalian adenylyl cyclases and high throughput screening.
AID1347160Primary screen NINDS Rhodamine qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347159Primary screen GU Rhodamine qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
AID1346943Human SERT (Monoamine transporter subfamily)2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-15, Volume: 16, Issue:12
Carbon-11 labeled indolylpropylamine analog as a new potential PET agent for imaging of the serotonin transporter.
AID1346971Human NET (Monoamine transporter subfamily)2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-01, Volume: 23, Issue:1
A rhodamine-labeled citalopram analogue as a high-affinity fluorescent probe for the serotonin transporter.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (5,018)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-1990149 (2.97)18.7374
1990's514 (10.24)18.2507
2000's1740 (34.68)29.6817
2010's2173 (43.30)24.3611
2020's442 (8.81)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 140.85

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index140.85 (24.57)
Research Supply Index8.82 (2.92)
Research Growth Index5.18 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index268.24 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (140.85)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials1,424 (26.63%)5.53%
Reviews344 (6.43%)6.00%
Case Studies677 (12.66%)4.05%
Observational26 (0.49%)0.25%
Other2,877 (53.80%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (247)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
The Effects of Mood Symptoms Treatment on Quality of Life and Motor Function in de Novo Parkinson's Disease Patients [NCT04590612]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-31Not yet recruiting
Pioglitazone as an Adjunct for Moderate to Severe Depressive Disorder [NCT01109030]Phase 2/Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Randomized, 2-way Crossover, Bioequivalence Study of Citalopram Hydrobromide 40 mg Tablets and Celexa 40 mg Tablets Administered as 1 x 40 mg Tablet in Healthy Subjects Under Fed Conditions [NCT01149980]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
Double-blind Clinical Trial Controlled With Placebo of the Efficacy of Reboxetine and Citalopram as an Adjunct Treatment to Second Generation Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia [NCT01300364]Phase 4249 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-11-30Recruiting
Antidepressant Effect of Escitalopram: Delay of Onset. Clinical Randomized Double-blinded Study With Three Parallel Treatment Groups (Escitalopram 20mg vs Escitalopram 30mg vs Escitalopram 20 mg + Pindolol 15 mg/Day [NCT01219686]Phase 2/Phase 318 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment difficulties)
Potential Predictive Biological Markers of Major Depression Response to Citalopram Therapy in Patients With Anorexia Nervosa: a Single-center Study. [NCT05795283]123 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-08-01Recruiting
Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous Citalopram in the Elderly: a Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis [NCT01216449]29 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Terminated(stopped due to loss of funding)
A Single-center, Single-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Sequential Design Phase 1 Study With the Inclusion of Two Double-blind Nested Crossover Parts to Investigate the Drug-drug Interactions Between ACT-541468 and Citalopram in Healthy Male and Fe [NCT03907215]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-09Completed
Chinese Longitudinal and Systematic Study of Bioplar Disorder [NCT05480150]10,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-01Recruiting
Fase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of LABCAT TCJUSS in Patients With Depressive Episode [NCT02532660]Phase 3111 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-02Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment difficulties due to monocentric study)
Microbiome of Depression &Amp; Treatment Response to Citalopram: A Feasibility Study [NCT02330068]34 participants (Actual)Observational2014-12-31Completed
A New System for Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastroesophageal Refulx Diseases : Based on Endoscopy, pH Parameter, Impedence Parameter, High Resolution Manometry and Psychology [NCT03600974]200 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-02-01Not yet recruiting
[NCT00149825]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
The Role of PKC Activation in the Immune-inflammatory Mechanism of Major Depressive Depression [NCT04156425]180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Not yet recruiting
Effect of Citalopram on Fasting and Postprandial Lower Esophageal Sphincter Function in Healthy Subjects: a Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Cross-over Study [NCT03746691]Phase 419 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-01Completed
Escitalopram and Language Intervention for Subacute Aphasia (ELISA) [NCT03843463]Phase 288 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-18Recruiting
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [NCT02179268]Phase 3203 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
The Role of Serotonin in Compulsive Behavior in Humans: Underlying Brain Mechanisms [NCT04336228]Phase 448 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-01Recruiting
A Phase I, Open-label, Randomized, 3-way Crossover Trial in Healthy Subjects to Investigate the Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between TMC435 and Escitalopram at Steady-state [NCT01090700]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Predictors of Depression Treatment Response Following an Acute Coronary Syndrome [NCT01099592]Phase 47 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Terminated(stopped due to inability to recruit)
Comprehensive Acupuncture for Depressive Disorder With Comorbid Psychogenic Pain: Randomized Controlled Study [NCT03282110]Early Phase 160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-30Not yet recruiting
A Multi-Center, Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, Flexible Dose Titration, Add-On Study of TC-5214 in the Treatment of MDD With Subjects Who Are Partial Responders or Non-Responders to Citalopram Therapy [NCT00692445]Phase 2574 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Auricular Concha Electro-acupuncture for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03607331]Early Phase 1106 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-17Recruiting
Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Commonly Used Drugs in Lactating Women and Breastfed Infants [NCT03511118]1,600 participants (Anticipated)Observational2018-10-04Recruiting
Mechanism of tDCS-induced Learning Enhancement - the Role of Serotonin [NCT02092974]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
A Single Dose, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Phase I Study on the Effects of BI 1358894 on Functional MRI Measurements in an Emotional Processing Paradigm in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT03854578]Phase 173 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-12Completed
Combining SSRIs and TDCS to Enhance Motor Recovery After Stroke [NCT05041582]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-01Not yet recruiting
Optimizing Antidepressant Treatment by Genotype-dependent Adjustment of Medication According to the ABCB1 Gene [NCT02237937]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-09-30Recruiting
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study in Huntington's Disease (CIT-HD) [NCT00271596]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
Effects of a 14-day Combined Antidepressant and Behavioural Intervention on Emotional Cognition in Healthy Volunteers Experiencing Low Mood [NCT05627154]135 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-28Recruiting
A New Biomarker-Based Approach Towards Developing Improved Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) Based Upon Targeting Monoamine Oxidase A (MAO-A) [NCT02269540]Early Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
Serotonin-norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors and Acute Kidney Injury [NCT02320240]3,255,526 participants (Actual)Observational2013-06-30Completed
A Single Center, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-design Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of RO4995819 in Combination With Citalopram Following Oral Administration in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01367756]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
Randomized, 2-way Crossover, Bioequivalence Study of Citalopram Hydrobromide 40 mg Tablets and Celexa 40 mg Tablets Administered as 1 x 40 mg Tablet in Healthy Subjects Under Fasting Conditions [NCT01149967]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
Unraveling Impaired Pain Inhibition in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Central Sensitivity Syndromes: a Series of Experiments Targeting Brain Neurotransmission [NCT01154647]70 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-09-30Not yet recruiting
Pilot Study of Treatment of Depression in Refractory Asthma [NCT01153165]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-11-30Recruiting
Adherence to Antidepressant Treatment in Subjects With Depression [NCT03388164]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-01Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated early based on the planned interim analysis that did not meet criteria for continuation.)
Citalopram Titration in Early Non-responder Patients With Major Depressive Disorders: a Pilot Study (CRY-MOOD) [NCT03899285]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-08Completed
Continuation Electroconvulsive Therapy Associated With Pharmacotherapy Versus Pharmacotherapy Alone for Relapse Prevention in Major Depression. A Clinical, Controlled, Prospective and Randomized Trial [NCT01305707]Phase 4104 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Difficulties in recruiting)
A Pilot Study Utilizing Escitalopram to Address Cognitive Dysfunction in Glioma Patients [NCT03728673]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-06Recruiting
Discontinuation of Antipsychotics and Antidepressants Among Patients With Dementia and BPSD Living in Nursing Homes - a 24 Weeks Double Blind RCT. [NCT00594269]Phase 4149 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Response to Psychopharmacotherapy According to Multimodal Serum Biomarkers in Depressive Patients [NCT06054321]400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-03Recruiting
Stress and Inflammation in the Pathophysiology of Late Life Depression [NCT02389465]Phase 4119 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Citalopram for Sx/Util in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients [NCT01667744]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-01Withdrawn(stopped due to unfunded)
TRY FIRST: A 12-Week, Randomized, Open-Label Trial of Duloxetine Versus Generic SSRIs in the Treatment of a Severe Depressive Episode [NCT00666757]Phase 4750 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Randomized Double-blind Parallel Innovator-Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Generic Escitalopram Oxalate Tablets in the Treatment of Chinese Patients With Depression [NCT00866593]Phase 2/Phase 3260 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
"(The Role of the Glutamatergic Neurotransmission in Post- Partum Depression: an Integrated Molecular-pharmaco-imaging Study)" [NCT06131255]15 participants (Anticipated)Observational2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial to Assess Safety and Effectiveness of Liposom in Enhance and Speed up Response With Citalopram in Elderly Patients Suffering From Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) [NCT04975724]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-18Recruiting
Pentoxifylline as a New Adjuvant in Adult Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial. [NCT03554447]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-20Completed
Etude Comparative Monocentrique, randomisée, en Cross-over, en Double Aveugle, Contre Placebo, de l'Action du Citalopram Sur Les paramètres Cognitifs de la Motivation [NCT02113943]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Serum Concentrations of Antidepressant Drugs in Pregnant Women - a Naturalistic Study [NCT04806230]81 participants (Actual)Observational2011-04-01Completed
A Randomized, Single Dose, Open Label, Bioequivalence Study Comparing Citalopram Hydrobromide Tablets 40 mg (Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd) and RLD Tablets 40 mg (Manufactured By Forest Pharmaceuticals Inc, Missouri) in 24+2 Normal Healthy Male Subjects Und [NCT00940238]Phase 10 participants InterventionalCompleted
Development of Escitalopram Genomic Device by Using Candidate Gene Approach and Genome-Wide Scanning [NCT00935246]202 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-12-31Active, not recruiting
Assessment of PACAP-BDNF Signaling System Involvement in Etiology and Treatment of Major Depression [NCT00944996]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Predicting Alcoholics' Treatment Responses to an SSRI [NCT00249405]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Acute Neurophysiologic Effects of Intravenous (IV) Citalopram Hydrochloride During Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) [NCT04846829]Early Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-04-24Active, not recruiting
Cognitive Flexibility and Its Correlation to Sleep and Neuroplasticity In The Course Of Depression During Different Treatments [NCT00993876]45 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Individually Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Arm RCT With 12-month Follow-up to Establish the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of the Antidepressant Citalopram in the Management of Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia [NCT01032083]Phase 462 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study of Escitalopram in the Treatment of Dysthymic Disorder [NCT00220701]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI's) and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Therapy (SSRI's) for the Management of Non Cardiac Chest Pain (NCCP) [NCT02825342]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Primary endpoint was reached.)
The Effects of Vilazodone on Glutamate in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Anxious Unipolar Depressives [NCT02028026]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Inability to recruit eligible subjects)
A Randomized, Single Dose, Open Label, Bioequivalence Study Comparing Citalopram Hydrobromide Tablets 40 mg (Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd) and RLD Tablets 40 mg (Manufactured By Forest Pharmaceuticals Inc, Missouri) in 24+2 Normal Healthy Male Subjects in [NCT00939835]Phase 10 participants InterventionalCompleted
Treatment for Bipolar Depression: Acute & Prophylactic Efficacy With Citalopram [NCT00562861]Phase 2/Phase 3119 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Citalopram and Escitalopram [NCT00613470]Phase 1927 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
The Objective of This Study Was to Investigate the Bioequivalence of Mylan's Escitalopram Oxalate 20 mg Tablets to Forest's Lexapro® 20 mg Tablets Following a Single, Oral 20 mg (1 x 20 mg) Dose Administered Under Fasting Conditions. [NCT00648570]Phase 137 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Early Medication Change (EMC) Strategy With Treatment as Usual (TAU) in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder - the EMC Trial [NCT00974155]Phase 4889 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Effects of 3 Months of SSRI-Treatment on Metabolism and HPA-axis in Young Men Born With Low Birth Weight - a Randomized, Double Blinded and Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT00971815]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
N-methylglycine (Sarcosine) for Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder [NCT00977353]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Single Dose Crossover Comparative Bioavailability Study of Citalopram 40 mg Tablets in Healthy Male Volunteers/Fasting State [NCT00865085]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Relative Bioavailability of 10 mg Citalopram Hydrobromide Tablets Under Fasting Conditions [NCT00865943]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
Combining Antidepressants to Hasten Remission From Depression [NCT00519428]Phase 4245 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
A Phase IV, Longitudinal, Observational Study Examining Real-World Outcomes of Non-Hormonal Pharmacotherapies Among Individuals Treated for Bothersome Vasomotor Symptoms [NCT06049797]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-11-15Recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of SAGE-217 Plus an Antidepressant Versus Placebo Plus an Antidepressant in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT04476030]Phase 3440 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-09Completed
A Controlled Trial of Citalopram Added to Methylphenidate in Youth With Severe Mood Dysregulation [NCT00794040]Phase 2103 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-17Completed
Behavioral Insomnia Therapy For Those With Insomnia and Depression [NCT00620789]477 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-03-31Recruiting
Treating Suicidal Behavior and Self-Mutilation in Borderline Personality Disorder: Predictors of Change [NCT00834834]Phase 484 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Phase IIa Proof of Concept Study of Pipamperone/Citalopram (PipCit) Versus Citalopram in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) [NCT00672659]Phase 2165 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Fixed-Dose Study of Escitalopram in Combination With Two Fixed Doses of Gaboxadol Compared to Escitalopram in Major Depressive Disorder [NCT00807248]Phase 2490 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Human Cerebral Blood Flow and Serotonin [NCT05957094]15 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-31Not yet recruiting
Effects of Single Dose Citalopram and Reboxetine on Urethral and Anal Closure Function on Healthy Female Subjects [NCT04097288]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-17Completed
Phase II Study Using Nexalin Therapy for the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms Associated With Mild to Moderate Depression Episodes [NCT00774813]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Single-Dose Food In Vivo Bioequivalence Study of Escitalopram Oxalate Tablets (20 mg; Mylan) to Lexapro® Tablets (20 mg; Forest) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00648661]Phase 135 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
A Multimodal Technology-assisted Intervention for the Management of Menopause After Cancer: The Menopause After Cancer Study [NCT04766229]Phase 2205 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-21Completed
Examination of the Pharmacokinetic Properties of Two Generic Antidepressants and Their Respective Brand Preparations in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT00676039]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Eszopiclone Co-Administered With Escitalopram for Insomnia in Elderly Adults With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT00813735]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
[NCT00217828]0 participants Interventional2002-03-31Completed
Phase 4 Study of Development of Pharmacogenomic Method to Predict Antidepressant Responsiveness [NCT00817011]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-04-30Recruiting
[NCT00838305]13 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Double-Blind Switch Study of Vilazodone in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder Following Partial Response to or Inability to Tolerate a Generic SSRI [NCT01742832]Phase 279 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Functional MRI Evaluation of the Effect of Citalopram in Autism Spectrum Disorders [NCT00609531]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Brain Mechanisms and Targeting Insomnia in Major Depression [NCT00628914]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-05-31Active, not recruiting
Determination of the Circadian Resetting Effects of Escitalopram and Testing for Correlations Between Circadian Resetting and Antidepressant Effects [NCT01214044]19 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Single-dose, Open-label, Randomised, Crossover Bioequivalence Study in Healthy Young Men Comparing Two Formulations of Escitalopram [NCT01395433]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Single Dose Crossover Comparative Bioavailability Study of Citalopram 40 mg Tablets in Healthy Male Volunteers/Fed State [NCT00864890]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Pilot Study -- An Open-Label, Rater-blinded, Flexible-dose, 8-week Trial of Escitalopram (Lexapro®) In Patients With Major Depression With Atypical Features. [NCT00610506]Phase 315 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
A Study to Investigate the Effect of Antidepressants on the Treatment for Korean Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) Patients [NCT00926835]Phase 4692 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Terminated(stopped due to due to patient recruitment difficulties)
Can Brain Activation and Connectivity Predict Treatment Response to Two Serotonergic Medications (Citalopram and Tianeptine) in Subjects With Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD)? [NCT04145076]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-12-15Recruiting
Sinusitis and Facial Pain Disorders Anti-Depression Trial [NCT00754793]Phase 43 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Terminated(stopped due to poor recruitment)
Effect of Citalopram on Chest Pain in Patients With Functional Chest Pain [NCT05735756]Phase 41 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-17Terminated(stopped due to The clinical trial has ended prematurely due to low patient recruitment)
Placebo Effects in the Treatment of Depression: Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms [NCT01919216]Phase 465 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Bariatric Surgery and Pharmacokinetics Escitalopram: BAR-MEDS Escitalopram [NCT03460379]12 participants (Anticipated)Observational2016-11-02Recruiting
Specific Effects of Escitalopram on Neuroendocrine Response [NCT00150527]8 participants (Actual)Observational2005-09-30Completed
[NCT00532519]0 participants InterventionalNot yet recruiting
Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Comparison Study of Improvement in Negative Symptoms With Risperidone vs Risperidone +Citalopram Combination Therapy in Schizophrenia--a Clinical Study [NCT00893256]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
The Use of Quantitative EEG (QEEG) as a Predictor of Treatment Outcome in Major Depressive Disorder [NCT00157547]Phase 495 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
Symptom Management Trial in Cancer Survivors [NCT00387348]Phase 324 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Terminated(stopped due to DSMB stopped study because placebo arm had more adverse events)
Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) and QEEG as Biological Markers of Response to (Es)Citalopram Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder [NCT00361218]Phase 372 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
The Effect of the Menstrual Cycle on the Symptoms of Depression and Treatment Response: A Comparison of Premenopausal, Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Women [NCT00188396]44 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Escitalopram and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Major Depressive Disorder: a Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial [NCT01894815]Phase 3245 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
The Role of Cytokine-Serotonin Interactions in Post-Stroke Depression [NCT00254020]Phase 4138 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
The Efficacy of Citalopram Treatment in Acute Stroke [NCT01937182]Phase 2642 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Antidepressants, Emotions and Personality: Comparing the Neuropsychological Effects of the Antidepressant Citalopram in Healthy Volunteers With High and Low Neuroticism [NCT01946607]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
A Blinded, Placebo- and Comparator-Controlled Three-way Crossover Study to Investigate the Pharmacodynamics, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of JNJ-40411813 in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT01951053]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
VISN 20 Prophylactic Treatment of IFN-Induced Depression in Hepatitis C [NCT00108563]Phase 40 participants Interventional2003-10-31Completed
Pharmacokinetic Drug-drug Interaction Study Between RaltEgravir and CITALopram in Healthy Subjects (RECITAL). [NCT01978782]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
An Open Label, Randomised, 2-Period, 2-Treatment, Crossover, Single-Dose Bioequivalence Study of Escitalopram Oxalate Tablet Containing Escitalopram (20mg) [Test Formulation, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India] Versus Lexapro® Tablet (20mg) [Reference Fo [NCT01996462]Phase 10 participants InterventionalCompleted
An Open Label, Randomized, 2-Period, 2-Treatment, Crossover, Single-Dose Bioequivalence Study of Escitalopram Oxalate Tablet 20mg [Test Formulation, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India] Versus Lexapro® (Escitalopram Oxalate Tablet 20mg) [Reference Formula [NCT01996475]Phase 10 participants InterventionalCompleted
[NCT02000726]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of funding to complete the trial phase of the study.)
The Serotonin Transporter Gene Polymorphism and Major Depression Following Traumatic Brain Injury [NCT00254007]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
Randomized Controlled Trial of Treating Rectal Hypersensitivity - Comparing Escitalopram With Sensory Adaptation Training [NCT00584571]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
Effect of Citalopram on Clinical Symptoms and Visceral Sensitivity in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome [NCT00477165]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
Combination Therapy With Modafinil and Escitalopram for the Treatment of Cocaine Dependence [NCT01601730]Phase 168 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Genetic-pharmacological Neuroimaging of the Serotonergic System in Violent Video Games [NCT01644071]47 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Longitudinal Comparative Effectiveness of Bipolar Disorder Therapies [NCT02893371]1,037,352 participants (Actual)Observational2016-09-30Completed
Unraveling the Nature of Impaired Pain Inhibition in Patients With Chronic Whiplash-associated Disorders: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial for the Treatment of Central Sensitization [NCT01601912]59 participants (Actual)Observational2013-02-28Completed
The Effect of Acute Citalopram on Response to Acute Stress Induction [NCT04161209]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-11Recruiting
A Comparison of the CNS Effects of Equivalent Doses of Escitalopram and Racemic Citalopram Using BOLD fMRI [NCT00825825]Phase 427 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Relapse Prevention in Patients With a Major Depressive Episode Treated With Electroconvulsive Treatment Using a Fixed Dose Range of Escitalopram Compared to a Fixed Dose of Nortriptyline (DUAG-7) A Randomised Controlled 6 Month Double-blind Study [NCT00660062]Phase 447 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow inclusion)
A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Citalopram for Anxiety Disorders Following Traumatic Brain Injury [NCT00208572]104 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-11-30Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Fixed-Dose Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Citalopram in Combination With Lithium or Placebo in the Treatment of Symptoms in Patients With Depressive Mood Disorders [NCT01189812]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
[NCT02711215]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-05-31Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Depression Interventions After Acute Coronary Syndrome (CODIACS) [NCT01032018]Phase 1/Phase 2150 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
The Effect of Acute Citalopram on Self-referential Emotional Processing and Social Cognition in Healthy Volunteers [NCT04169230]44 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-11Recruiting
A Multi-Center Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Study of Citalopram for the Treatment of Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease [NCT00898807]Phase 3186 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Fluoxetine for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: a Randomized Open Trial for Any Patient. [NCT00680602]Phase 4158 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
The Efficacy and Tolerability of Seroquel XR Combined With a Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitor Versus Seroquel XR Monotherapy in the Acute Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder With Psychotic Features [NCT00955474]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Terminated(stopped due to AstraZeneca halted funding; patent expired for Seroquel (Quetiapine) in 2012)
Combined Administration of Lecozotan SR and Citalopram: a Double Blind, Multiple Dose Study in Young Healthy Subjects [NCT00538889]Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
The Effects of PF-04995274 on Emotional Processing in Un-medicated Depressed Patients [NCT03516604]Phase 190 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-16Completed
Emotional Processing in Healthy Male Volunteers Treated With GSK424887. A Single Centre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Parallel Group Study [NCT01424384]Phase 154 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-19Completed
Clinical Trial to Investigate the Effect on Corrected QT Interval Prolongation by Psychotropic Drugs in Healthy Korean Adults After a Single Oral Administration of Escitalopram, Quetiapine, and Moxifloxacin [NCT01871701]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Discontinuation of Antipsychotics and Antidepressants Among Patients With Dementia and BPSD Living in Nursing Homes - an Open Study. [NCT00433121]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A Comparative Study on Efficacy and Safety of add-on Sulforaphane or rTMS to Escitalopram for Major Depressive Disorder With Poor Response to Initial Treatment [NCT05145270]Phase 4180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-30Recruiting
Comparative Evaluation of Vortioxetine Versus Other Antidepressants With Pregabalin Augmentation in Treatment-resistant Burning Mouth Syndrome: a Prospective Longitudinal Clinical Trial With Treatment Response Prediction [NCT06025474]Phase 3203 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-01Recruiting
Evaluation of [11C]Cimbi-36 as an Agonist PET Radioligand for Imaging of 5-HT2A Receptors [NCT01778686]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Pilot Study to Evaluate Individualized Choice of Antidepressant in Patients With Cancer [NCT01725048]Early Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
PUFA Augmentation in Treatment of Major Depression [NCT00067301]Phase 360 participants Interventional2003-09-30Completed
[NCT00249886]Phase 360 participants Interventional2002-09-30Withdrawn
Continuation Pharmacotherapy for Agitation of Dementia [NCT00073658]Phase 2137 participants Interventional2000-01-31Completed
Depression: The Search for Treatment-Relevant Phenotypes [NCT00073697]Phase 4290 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-05-31Completed
Serotonin, Impulsivity, and Cocaine Dependence Treatment [NCT00297505]Phase 2120 participants Interventional2001-04-30Completed
Comparative Responses to 15 Different Antidepressants in Major Depressive Disorder - Results From a Long-term Nation-wide Population-based Study Emulating a Randomized Trial [NCT05952713]73,336 participants (Actual)Observational2022-10-01Completed
A Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial of Citalopram for the Prevention of Depression and Its Consequences in HIV-Hepatitis C Co-infected Individuals Initiating Pegylated Interferon/Ribavirin Therapy [NCT00317746]Phase 376 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Citalopram Treatment in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders and High Levels of Repetitive Behavior [NCT00086645]Phase 2149 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Add-on to Cognitive, ERP and EEG Asymmetry in Affective Disorders (#6559R) [Formerly #5723] [NCT03278938]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-29Withdrawn(stopped due to PI Retired and no data was collected)
A Multi-Centre, Double-Blind, Randomised, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Quetiapine Fumarate Sustained Release (Seroquel SRTM) in Combination With an Antidepressant in the Treatment of Patients With Major [NCT00351910]Phase 3494 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Open, Two Periods, Two Treatments, Two Sequences, Cross-over, Randomized Study With Single Dosage of Two Oral Preparations in Tablets Containing Escitalopram 10 mg (Product From GlaxoSmithKline México, S.A. de C.V. vs. Lexapro® 10mg, Lundbeck México, S.A. [NCT01745601]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-04Completed
The Effects of Increased Central Serotonergic Activity on Psychophysiological Parameters of Human Information Processing [NCT00206934]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo- and Active-Controlled Study of F2695 SR in Adult Patients With Fatigue Associated With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT01254305]Phase 2262 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
The Role of Childhood Adversity and Genetic Polymorphisms in the Serotonin and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Systems in the Sensitization to Stress in First-Onset Major Depression (Blue Sky Project) [NCT00517764]299 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Citalopram Improves Vasomotor and Urogenital Syndromes in Mexican Patients With Post-menopause [NCT05346445]91 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-20Completed
The Effect of Antidepressants and Gabapentin on Tamoxifen Pharmacokinetics: A Prospective Study [NCT00667121]85 participants (Anticipated)Observational2011-03-16Active, not recruiting
Pharmacotherapy Dosing Regimen in Cocaine and Opiate Dependent Individuals [NCT00218036]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Terminated(stopped due to PI left institution, end of funding, clinic relocation, recruitment issues)
Molecular Markers of Neuroplasticity During High-Intensity Exercise in Subjects With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury [NCT01538693]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Neuroimaging Study of Bupropion Treatment in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT01541475]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Serotonergic Pharmacotherapy for Agitation of Dementia [NCT00009204]Phase 30 participants Interventional1995-09-30Completed
Ethnic Variations in Antidepressant Response [NCT00047671]Phase 4400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
[NCT00080158]Phase 2/Phase 3120 participants Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Comparative Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Medications in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (CATIE Alzheimer's Disease Trial) [NCT00015548]450 participants Interventional2001-03-31Completed
Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression [NCT00021528]Phase 44,000 participants Interventional2001-07-31Completed
Treatment of SSRI-Resistant Depression in Adolescents (TORDIA) [NCT00018902]Phase 2/Phase 3334 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-01-31Completed
Vascular Depression and Magnetic Stimulation Therapy [NCT00044798]Phase 3132 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-09-30Completed
Citalopram Augmentation in Older Patients With Schizophrenia [NCT00047450]212 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-09-30Completed
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Investigation Into the Safety and Efficacy of Escitalopram for Depression in Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00151294]Phase 420 participants Interventional2004-11-30Terminated
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Antidepressant Maintenance for Major Depression Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury [NCT00162916]Phase 421 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Active, not recruiting
Can Additional Drug Therapy Accelerate Response Time to Antidepressants: A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Randomization Research Study for Major Depression [NCT00221494]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to PI move)
Assessing Tolerability and Efficacy of Vortioxetine Versus SSRIs in Elderly Patients With Depression: a Pragmatic, Multicenter, Open-label, Parallel-group, Superiority, Randomized Trial [NCT03779789]Phase 4362 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-01Completed
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Acamprosate Added to Escitalopram and Behavioral Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) With Comorbid Alcohol Abuse/Dependence [NCT00452543]Phase 423 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes [NCT00590863]Phase 4665 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
A Double-blind, Fixed-dose Study of Escitalopram in Adult Patients With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT00668525]Phase 3877 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Predictors of Antidepressant Response [NCT02178696]Phase 444 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
[NCT02655354]635 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Randomized, Controlled, Open and Unicentric Phase II Clinical Trial, With Two Parallel Groups, to Evaluate the Antidepressant Efficacy of Psychotherapy and Citalopram in Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer and Major Depression [NCT05063604]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-05-10Terminated(stopped due to The CAMAD clinical trial has been terminated due to difficulties in recruiting patients.)
Alcohol and Gender Effects on Stress Circuit Function [NCT00226694]96 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Phase 4 Study of Clinical Pharmacogenomics of Antidepressant Response [NCT00269334]Phase 4400 participants Interventional2005-12-31Not yet recruiting
Combined Escitalopram/Bupropion as First Line Treatment for Depression, a Replication. [NCT00296712]Phase 455 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Algorithm Guided Treatment Strategies for Major Depressive Disorder [NCT01764867]Phase 41,080 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-06-30Recruiting
Antidepressant Treatments During Pregnancy and Lactation: Prediction of Drug Exposure Through Breastfeeding and Evaluation of Drug Effect on the Neonatal Adaptation and the Development of the Young Child [NCT01796132]Phase 4500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-08-31Recruiting
Prediction of Clinical Response to SSRI Treatment in Bipolar Disorder Using Serotonin 1A Receptor PET Imaging [NCT02473250]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Adjunctive Treatment of Major Depression Utilizing Auricular Acupuncture [NCT02579343]13 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of Citalopram for the Treatment of Hot Flashes [NCT00363909]Phase 3254 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
An Objective Double-blind Evaluation of Bupropion and Citalopram in an Individual With Friedreich Ataxia [NCT01716221]Phase 41 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
Antidepressant Treatment at an Inner City Asthma Clinic [NCT01324700]Phase 4139 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
Pilot Combination Treatment Trial of Mild Cognitive Impairment With Depression [NCT01658228]Phase 486 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Pipamperone/Citalopram (PNB01) Versus Citalopram (CIT) and Versus Pipamperone (PIP) in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Major Depressive Disorder (MDD): a Randomized, Double-blind Phase III Study of 10 Weeks [NCT01312922]Phase 3555 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Cognitive-Behavior Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder [NCT01460212]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-12-31Recruiting
Personalizing Treatment of Depression Complicated by Panic Features-Pilot Study [NCT00930293]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Anxiety and Recurrent Abdominal Pain in Children [NCT00962039]Phase 2/Phase 381 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Placebo-controlled Trial With Citalopram for the Treatment of Typical Reflux Symptoms in Patients With Reflux Hypersensitivity or Functional Heartburn With Incomplete Proton Pump Inhibitor Response [NCT03499171]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-27Recruiting
A Pilot Study Examining the Gut Microbiota in Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder vs. Healthy Controls and Following 12-weeks of Open-label Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors Treatment [NCT02285699]43 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-11-01Completed
Study to Determine Steady-state Level of Citalopram Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Patients With Short Bowel Syndrome [NCT00876226]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-01Withdrawn
Effectiveness of the Use of Antidepressants in the Treatment of Muscle Type Temporomandibular Disorders [NCT04777838]Phase 2/Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-31Not yet recruiting
REward Processing And Citalopram Study [NCT06017037]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-19Recruiting
Efficacy of Exposure and Response Prevention(ERP) and SSRIs, and Its Predictors in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder [NCT02022709]Phase 478 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Efficacy of Interpersonal Psychotherapy in Treatment Resistant Depression [NCT01896349]74 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-04-30Recruiting
Treatment of Pediatric OCD for SRI Partial Responders [NCT00074815]Phase 3124 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Pharmacotherapy for Minor Depression [NCT00048815]73 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
[NCT02423694]252 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-09-30Recruiting
Sertraline Versus Escitalopram in South Asian Participants With Moderate to Severe Major Depressive Disorder: A Double-blind, Parallel, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05950061]Phase 3744 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-06-01Completed
Functional MRI Before and After Treatment for Depression [NCT00896441]31 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Funding ended)
Effects of Serotonin Agonist Citalopram on Multimodal Esophageal Stimulation in Healthy Volunteers [NCT04355455]14 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
A Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial of Escitalopram and Nortriptyline With Standard Psychological Care for Depression in Parkinson's Disease [NCT03652870]Phase 352 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-05Completed
Pharmacogenetics and Neuroimaging in Major Depressive Disorder (PAN-D) [NCT01568684]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-12Withdrawn
[NCT01575158]59 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-10-31Completed
Optimizing Treatment for Complicated Grief (Healing Emotions After Loss:HEAL) [NCT01179568]Phase 2395 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
A Double-blinded 6-week Prospective Study to Evaluate the Remission Rate According to Dose of Escitalopram (Lexapro®) in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: a Preliminary Study [NCT01594866]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Serotonergic Function and Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Frontotemporal Dementia [NCT00376051]Phase 422 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Ramelteon for Sleep Initiation Insomnia in Panic Disorder Who Are Also on Escitalopram for Anxiety: A Double Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT00746239]11 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Funding for continuation was not received.)
SPECT Brain Imaging as a Bio-Marker of Major Depression [NCT00655057]Phase 2/Phase 366 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Research on Standardized Electronic Cognitive Training Technique in Early Stage of Senile Depression With Cognitive Impairment [NCT05588102]128 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-18Recruiting
Escitalopram Effects on CSF Amyloid Beta Total Concentrations [NCT02161458]Phase 498 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Effect of Serotonin and Levodopa Functional Recovery in Patients With Cerebral Infarction [NCT02386475]Phase 439 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Efficacy of Hydroxyzine Versus Treatment as Usual for Panic Disorder: An Eight-Week, Open Label, Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT05737511]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-30Not yet recruiting
Pharmacovigilance in Gerontopsychiatric Patients [NCT02374567]Phase 3407 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Terminated
Treatment of Depression Concurrent With Alcohol Abuse, an Extension of Alcohol Use Disorder in Patients Treated for Depression [NCT00369746]674 participants (Actual)Observational2006-09-30Completed
Clinical Trial of Serotonin Medication Combination in Cocaine Dependence [NCT01535573]Phase 2108 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Citalopram Effects on Craving and Dopamine Receptor Availability in Alcoholics [NCT01657760]Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-01Completed
Impact of Pots-stroke Depression Treatment on Stroke Recurrence [NCT04776226]1,230 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-11Completed
A Double-blind, Placebo- and Active-controlled, Fixed-dose Study of Vilazodone in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT01473381]Phase 41,162 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
A 21-week, Multicenter, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability Profile of the Combination of a SSRI or SNRI Antidepressive Therapy With Oral Fingolimod in the Treatment of RRMS Patients With Mild to Moderate Depression [NCT01436643]Phase 454 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Due to slow enrollment the study was terminated early)
Escitalopram in the Treatment of Outpatients With Severe Asthma and Moderate or Severe Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial [NCT00621946]Phase 426 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
The Use of Methylphenidate to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Geriatric Depression: A Double-blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Methylphenidate (Ritalin) Augmentation of Citalopram (Celexa) in Depressed Elderly Patients [NCT00602290]Phase 4181 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Time to Remission of Depressive Symptoms With Combined SSRI and Ramelteon [NCT00642694]Phase 329 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Enrollment discontinued based on mutually agreed upon decision by PI and funding sponsor)
The Effect of Patient and Investigator Expectation on the Efficacy of Escitalopram in the Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. [NCT02480400]52 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Effects of Combined Memantine (Namenda) Plus Escitalopram (Lexapro) Treatment in Elderly Depressed Patients With Cognitive Impairment [NCT01876823]Phase 2/Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Citalopram in First Episode Schizophrenia [NCT01041274]Phase 495 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Effects of Treatment on Decision-making in Major Depression [NCT01916824]Phase 453 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
Effectiveness and Safety of Transcutaneous Electrical Cranial-auricular Acupoint Stimulation (TECAS) for Patients With Mild-to-moderate Depression. [NCT03909217]Phase 2/Phase 3470 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-29Recruiting
Acupuncture and Escitalopram for Treating Major Depression Clinical Study (AE-TMDCS): Study Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05901571]216 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-30Not yet recruiting
Pentoxifylline as an Adjunct to Citalopram in Adult Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial [NCT05271084]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-11-10Completed
Brain Imaging and Treatment Studies of the Night Eating Syndrome [NCT01401595]Phase 387 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
Study on the Optimal Diagnosis and Treatment Strategy of Major Depressive Disorder Based on Anhedonia [NCT05389046]252 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-31Not yet recruiting
Citalopram as a Posterior Cortical Protective Therapy in Parkinson Disease [NCT04497168]Phase 258 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-01Recruiting
Depression Treatment and Aβ Dynamics: A Study of Alzheimer's Disease Risk (ABD Study) [NCT05004987]Phase 490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-04Recruiting
A Multi-centre, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Active-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Bupropion Hydrochloride Extended-release (Bupropion XL 300mg Once Daily), Escitalopram Oxalate (Escitalopram, 10mg-20mg Once Dai [NCT02191397]Phase 3534 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-10Completed
Brain Function and Structure in Cocaine Dependence [NCT02080832]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Glutamatergic and GABAergic Mediators of Antidepressant Response in Major Depression [NCT01557946]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Testing an Imaging Biomarker for Treatment Stratification in Major Depression [NCT02137369]Phase 477 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00048815 (2) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events (Physical Symptoms) Emerging or Worsening During 12 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00048815 (2) [back to overview]Efficacy Assessed Using the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Rated (IDS-C)
NCT00074815 (1) [back to overview]Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS)
NCT00149825 (2) [back to overview]Remission of Depression (%)
NCT00149825 (2) [back to overview]Remission of Insomnia
NCT00220701 (6) [back to overview]Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
NCT00220701 (6) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impressions - Severity (CGI-S)
NCT00220701 (6) [back to overview]Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
NCT00220701 (6) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impressions - Severity (CGI-S)
NCT00220701 (6) [back to overview]Hamilton-Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-24 Items)
NCT00220701 (6) [back to overview]Hamilton-Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-24 Items)
NCT00271596 (10) [back to overview]Executive Function Composite Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort.
NCT00271596 (10) [back to overview]Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression Comparing Screening (Intake Visit) to Visit 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort
NCT00271596 (10) [back to overview]Letter Number Sequencing Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort
NCT00271596 (10) [back to overview]Semantic Fluency Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort
NCT00271596 (10) [back to overview]Stroop Interference Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort
NCT00271596 (10) [back to overview]Subgroup Analysis of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Comparing Screening (Intake Visit) to Visit 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort
NCT00271596 (10) [back to overview]Symbol-Digit Modalities Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort
NCT00271596 (10) [back to overview]Total Functional Capacity Score Comparing Baseline (Week -4) to Visits 4 (Week 6) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort
NCT00271596 (10) [back to overview]Trails B Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort
NCT00271596 (10) [back to overview]Verbal Fluency Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort
NCT00361218 (1) [back to overview]Serum Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Levels
NCT00369746 (5) [back to overview]Quick Inventory of Depression- Self Report 16
NCT00369746 (5) [back to overview]Quantitative Substance Use Inventory ((SUI)
NCT00369746 (5) [back to overview]Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) Maximum Drinks Per Drinking Day
NCT00369746 (5) [back to overview]Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) Average Drinks Per Drinking Day
NCT00369746 (5) [back to overview]Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) Drinking Days Per 30 Days
NCT00387348 (3) [back to overview]Side Effect Burden
NCT00387348 (3) [back to overview]Depression Response Rate of Escitalopram Oxalate 10 mg Once Daily Compared to Placebo Once Daily for Major Depressive Disorder
NCT00387348 (3) [back to overview]Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Scores
NCT00452543 (4) [back to overview]Total Drinks Consumed Per Week on the TLFB
NCT00452543 (4) [back to overview]Total Drinking Days on the Alcohol Timeline Followback (TLFB)
NCT00452543 (4) [back to overview]Total Drinks Consumed Per Drinking Day on the TLFB
NCT00452543 (4) [back to overview]Change in Mean Score on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression -- 17 Items (HAM-D-17)
NCT00477165 (4) [back to overview]"Count of Participants Who Self-reported Adequate Relief"
NCT00477165 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IBS-QOL Score at Week 8
NCT00477165 (4) [back to overview]Mean Sensation Score as a Function of Distending Pressure at the End of the Study
NCT00477165 (4) [back to overview]Urgency Score as a Function of Distending Pressure at the End of the Study
NCT00519428 (5) [back to overview]Functioning, as Measured by the Social Adjustment Scale (SAS) Summary Score
NCT00519428 (5) [back to overview]Quality of Life, as Measured by the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Short Form (SF)
NCT00519428 (5) [back to overview]Remission: Persistent Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17 Items (HAM-D 17) <= 7, With no HAM-D 17 >7 Through Week 12
NCT00519428 (5) [back to overview]Severity of Depressive Symptoms as Measured by Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D 17)
NCT00519428 (5) [back to overview]Time to Remission, Defined by the Week of Onset of Persistent Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D 17) <= 7, With no Subsequent HAM-D 17 > 7
NCT00562861 (1) [back to overview]MADRS Rating Scale Change
NCT00590863 (2) [back to overview]Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms
NCT00590863 (2) [back to overview]Quality of Life Inventory
NCT00602290 (2) [back to overview]Quality of Life Assessment
NCT00602290 (2) [back to overview]Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) Maintained Scores at Week 16
NCT00621946 (6) [back to overview]ACQ (Asthma Control Questionnaire)
NCT00621946 (6) [back to overview]ACQ (Asthma Control Questionnaire)
NCT00621946 (6) [back to overview]HAM-D (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression)
NCT00621946 (6) [back to overview]IDS-SR (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report)
NCT00621946 (6) [back to overview]IDS-SR (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report)
NCT00621946 (6) [back to overview]HAM-D (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression)
NCT00642694 (9) [back to overview]Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q)
NCT00642694 (9) [back to overview]Social Adjustment Scale - Self-Report (SAS-SR)
NCT00642694 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Remitters on IDS-C30 at Week 12
NCT00642694 (9) [back to overview]Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item
NCT00642694 (9) [back to overview]Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI)
NCT00642694 (9) [back to overview]Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)
NCT00642694 (9) [back to overview]Sleep Latency
NCT00642694 (9) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Benefits of Care (PPBC)
NCT00642694 (9) [back to overview]Short-Form Health Survey - Version 2 (SF-36)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week-12 Endpoint
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weight at Week-12 Endpoint
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Clinical Trials 7-Day Version (HPQ), Absenteeism at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Clinical Trials 7-Day Version (HPQ), Dollars of Income Lost Due to Work Absenteeism Score at Week-12 Endpoint
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Clinical Trials 7-Day Version (HPQ), Dollars of Income Lost Due to Work Presenteeism (WP)Score, at Week-12 Endpoint
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Clinical Trials 7-Day Version (HPQ), Presenteeism Score, at Week-12 Endpoint
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Probability of Remission [16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR) Score Less Than or Equal to 5 at 12-Week Endpoint]
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Probability of Remission [17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) (Mood Measure) Less Than or Equal to 7 at 12-Week Endpoint]
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Probability of Response [HAMD-17 Total Score (Mood Measure) Greater Than Or Equal To 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline To 12 Week Endpoint]
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Probability of Response [QIDS-SR Total Score (Mood Measure) Greater Than Or Equal To 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline To 12 Week Endpoint]
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week-12 Endpoint
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in BPI Average 24 Hour Pain Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Pain Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Average 24-hour Pain Score, in Particpants With a Baseline BPI Average 24-hour Pain Score of 3 or Greater, at 12-Week Endpoint (Pain Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week-12 Endpoint
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Anxiety/Somatization Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Bech Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Maier Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Retardation Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Sleep Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Total Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in QIDS-SR Total Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SDS Social Item Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Functional Outcome Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SDS Work/School Item Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Functional Outcome Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Family/Home Item Score at Week-12 Endpoint (Functional Outcome Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Functional Outcome Measure)
NCT00668525 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at 8 Weeks.
NCT00668525 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hamiltion Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) at Week 8
NCT00794040 (5) [back to overview]"Percentage of Participants That Much Improved (Score of 2) in, or Completely Recovered (Score of 1) From Their Irritability Severity, as Measured With the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)."
NCT00794040 (5) [back to overview]Irritability Severity at 8th Week of Trial.
NCT00794040 (5) [back to overview]Functional Impairment at 8th Week of Trial
NCT00794040 (5) [back to overview]Depressive Symptoms at 8th Week of Trial
NCT00794040 (5) [back to overview]Anxiety Symptoms at 8th Week of Trial
NCT00807248 (9) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I)
NCT00807248 (9) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S)
NCT00807248 (9) [back to overview]Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
NCT00807248 (9) [back to overview]Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
NCT00807248 (9) [back to overview]MADRS
NCT00807248 (9) [back to overview]Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
NCT00807248 (9) [back to overview]SDS: Social Subscale
NCT00807248 (9) [back to overview]SDS: Work Subscale
NCT00807248 (9) [back to overview]Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS): Family Subscale
NCT00825825 (7) [back to overview]Number of Voxels Showing Greater Activation Following Citalopram Compared With Placebo When Affective Faces Are Presented in a Covert Stimulus Presentation and Contrasted With a Fixation Stimulus.
NCT00825825 (7) [back to overview]Number of Voxels Showing Greater Activation Following Citalopram Compared With Placebo When Affective Faces Are Presented in a Covert Stimulus Presentation and Contrasted With a Fixation Stimulus.
NCT00825825 (7) [back to overview]Number of Voxels Showing Greater Activation Following Escitalopram Compared With Citalopram When Affective Words Are Contrasted With a Fixation Stimulus.
NCT00825825 (7) [back to overview]Number of Voxels Showing Greater Activation Following Escitalopram Compared With Citalopram When Faces and a Fixation Stimulus Are Presented in an Overt Presentation.
NCT00825825 (7) [back to overview]Number of Voxels Showing Greater Activation Following Escitalopram Compared With Placebo When Affective Faces Are Presented in a Covert Stimulus Presentation and Contrasted With a Fixation Stimulus.
NCT00825825 (7) [back to overview]Number of Voxels Showing Greater Activation Following Placebo Compared With Citalopram When Affective Words Are Contrasted With a Fixation Stimulus.
NCT00825825 (7) [back to overview]Number of Voxels Showing Greater Activation Following Escitalopram Compared With Citalopram When Happy and Fearful Faces Are Presented in a Rapid Covert Stimulus Presentation.
NCT00834834 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Suicide Events
NCT00834834 (2) [back to overview]Suicide Events
NCT00896441 (3) [back to overview]Hamilton Anxiety Scale
NCT00896441 (3) [back to overview]Voxel-wise Changes in Resting State Functional Connectivity to the Posterior Cingulate Cortex
NCT00896441 (3) [back to overview]Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Percent Change From Day 0 to D56
NCT00898807 (4) [back to overview]Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI)
NCT00898807 (4) [back to overview]Modified Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Clinical Global Impression of Change in Agitation(CGIC)
NCT00898807 (4) [back to overview]NeuroBehavior Rating Scale-- Agitation
NCT00898807 (4) [back to overview]Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)-- Agitation Subscore
NCT00930293 (2) [back to overview]Weeks to Depression Remission
NCT00930293 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Meeting Depression Remission Criteria
NCT00955474 (15) [back to overview]CPFQ (Cognitive and Psychological Functioning Questionnaire)
NCT00955474 (15) [back to overview]RBANS (Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status) Visuospatial/Constructional Sub-scale.
NCT00955474 (15) [back to overview]Blood Level of Triglycerides at Baseline and Week 8.
NCT00955474 (15) [back to overview]Blood Level of Total Cholesterol Levels Were Collected at Baseline and Week 8.
NCT00955474 (15) [back to overview]Blood Hemoglobin A1C at Baseline and Week 8.
NCT00955474 (15) [back to overview]RBANS (Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status) Attention Sub-scale Scores at Baseline and Week 8.
NCT00955474 (15) [back to overview]Psychosis
NCT00955474 (15) [back to overview]RBANS (Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status) Delayed Memory Subscale Scores at Baseline and Week 8.
NCT00955474 (15) [back to overview]RBANS (Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status) Immediate Memory Sub-scale Score
NCT00955474 (15) [back to overview]RBANS (Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status) Language Sub-scale Score.
NCT00955474 (15) [back to overview]RBANS (Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status) Total Score
NCT00955474 (15) [back to overview]LDL Blood Levels at Baseline and Week 8.
NCT00955474 (15) [back to overview]HDL Blood Levels at Baseline and Week 8.
NCT00955474 (15) [back to overview]Fasting Blood Glucose
NCT00955474 (15) [back to overview]Depression
NCT00962039 (6) [back to overview]Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS)
NCT00962039 (6) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S)
NCT00962039 (6) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) Will be Used to Assess Overall Global Illness Improvement. CGI-I Scores of 1 (Very Much Improved) or 2 (Much Improved) Indicate an Acceptable Treatment Response.
NCT00962039 (6) [back to overview]Children's Global Assessment Scale (C-GAS)
NCT00962039 (6) [back to overview]Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)
NCT00962039 (6) [back to overview]Abdominal Pain Index (API)
NCT01032018 (2) [back to overview]Depressive Symptom Reduction
NCT01032018 (2) [back to overview]Cost for Healthcare Utilization (Psychiatric Medications, Hospitalizations, Cardiac Procedures, Outpatient Services)
NCT01041274 (5) [back to overview]Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS)
NCT01041274 (5) [back to overview]Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)
NCT01041274 (5) [back to overview]Heinrich Quality of Life Scale (QOL)
NCT01041274 (5) [back to overview]InterSePT Scale for Suicidal Thinking (ISST)
NCT01041274 (5) [back to overview]Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS)
NCT01179568 (5) [back to overview]Responder Status Based on Complicated Grief Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale
NCT01179568 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG)
NCT01179568 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG)
NCT01179568 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)
NCT01179568 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)
NCT01189812 (1) [back to overview]Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS)
NCT01214044 (4) [back to overview]Change in Dim Light Melatonin Onset
NCT01214044 (4) [back to overview]Change in Phase Angle Difference (PAD)
NCT01214044 (4) [back to overview]Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Scores
NCT01214044 (4) [back to overview]Change in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) Scores
NCT01254305 (3) [back to overview]Change in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) for Fatigue Score
NCT01254305 (3) [back to overview]Change in Patient Global Impressions of Severity (PGI-S) for Fatigue Score
NCT01254305 (3) [back to overview]Change in Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ), Last Observation Carried Forward
NCT01312922 (1) [back to overview]Early and Sustained (Antidepressant) Response (ESR) Rate
NCT01324700 (2) [back to overview]Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)
NCT01324700 (2) [back to overview]Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD)
NCT01401595 (3) [back to overview]Nocturnal Ingestions
NCT01401595 (3) [back to overview]Night Eating Symptoms
NCT01401595 (3) [back to overview]Change in Symptoms of NES
NCT01436643 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death
NCT01473381 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 10 in the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score
NCT01473381 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 10
NCT01473381 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Sustained Response
NCT01535573 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Cocaine-positive Urines Per Week
NCT01535573 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Cocaine-negative Urines Collected During Treatment Period
NCT01535573 (4) [back to overview]Retention as Assessed by Number of Participants Remaining in Treatment
NCT01535573 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Are Cocaine Abstinent During the Last 2 Weeks of Treatment (Weeks 8-9), as Assessed by Urine Test
NCT01557946 (2) [back to overview]Mean Difference From Baseline to Day 3 in Glutamine/Glutamate (Gln/Glu) Ratio Within Depressed Group
NCT01557946 (2) [back to overview]Mean Difference From Baseline to Day 7 in Glutamine/Glutamate (Gln/Glu) Ratio Within Depressed Group
NCT01657760 (2) [back to overview]Craving for Alcohol in Alcohol Dependence With Citalopram Compared to Placebo
NCT01657760 (2) [back to overview]Striatal Dopamine Receptor Availability in Alcohol Dependence With Citalopram, Compared to Placebo
NCT01658228 (3) [back to overview]Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)
NCT01658228 (3) [back to overview]Selective Reminding Test (SRT) Delayed Recall
NCT01658228 (3) [back to overview]Selective Reminding Test (SRT) Total Recall
NCT01716221 (4) [back to overview]Comparison of FARS and ICARS
NCT01716221 (4) [back to overview]Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS)
NCT01716221 (4) [back to overview]Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
NCT01716221 (4) [back to overview]International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS)
NCT01742832 (1) [back to overview]Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
NCT01876823 (10) [back to overview]Change in Selective Reminding Test - Total Immediate Recall (SRT-IR)
NCT01876823 (10) [back to overview]Change in Trails A
NCT01876823 (10) [back to overview]Change in Trails B
NCT01876823 (10) [back to overview]Change in Wechsler Memory Scale-III (WMS-III)
NCT01876823 (10) [back to overview]Conversion to Dementia Using Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR)
NCT01876823 (10) [back to overview]Change in Clinical Global Impression - Cognitive Change
NCT01876823 (10) [back to overview]Change in Clinical Global Impression - Depression Change
NCT01876823 (10) [back to overview]Change in Treatment Emergent Side Effects (TESS)
NCT01876823 (10) [back to overview]Change in 24-item HAMD
NCT01876823 (10) [back to overview]Change in Selective Reminding Test - Delayed Recall (SRT-DR)
NCT01916824 (1) [back to overview]Money Earned
NCT01919216 (1) [back to overview]Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression
NCT02080832 (4) [back to overview]Cocaine Use/Treatment Effectiveness Score (TES)
NCT02080832 (4) [back to overview]fMRI Brain Activation in Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus
NCT02080832 (4) [back to overview]fMRI Brain Activation in Right Orlandic Operculum
NCT02080832 (4) [back to overview]fMRI Brain Activation in Right Precentral Gyrus
NCT02137369 (2) [back to overview]Number of Response to Treatment Events
NCT02137369 (2) [back to overview]Number of Remission From Major Depressive Episode Events
NCT02161458 (1) [back to overview]Amyloid Beta Levels in CSF
NCT02178696 (7) [back to overview]Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
NCT02178696 (7) [back to overview]Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Scores
NCT02178696 (7) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR-16) Score
NCT02178696 (7) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in PHQ-9 Depression Scores.
NCT02178696 (7) [back to overview]Changes in BOLD Response During Reward fMRI Task (Monetary Incentive Delay, MID)
NCT02178696 (7) [back to overview]Changes in Mu-opioid Binding Potential During PET
NCT02178696 (7) [back to overview]Changes in Dopamine (D 2/3) Binding Potential During PET.
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]"Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Score of 1 (Very Much Improved) or 2 (Much Improved) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8"
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Vital Sign Parameters Outside the Clinical Concern Range
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Retardation Subscale Score (Sum of Scores of Items 1, 7, 8 and 14) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH) at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) Score at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Triglyceride and Urea at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Gamma-glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGT) and Lactose Dehydrogenase (LD) at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Urinalysis Data Outside the Normal Range
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Sustained Response Rate Based on HAMD-17 Total Score
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Sustained Remission Rate Based on HAMD-17 Total Score
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Response Rate Based on HAMD-17 Total Score
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Remission Rate Based on HAMD-17 Total Score
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Mean Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - 17 (HAMD-17) Total Score From Baseline to End of Acute Treatment Phase (Week 8)
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Changes in Sexual Function Questionnaire (CSFQ)
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Depressed Mood Subscale Score (Score of Item 1) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Anxiety/Somatization Subscale Score (Sum of Scores of Items 10, 11, 12, 13, 15 and 17) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Sleep Disorder Subscale Score (Sum of Scores of Items 4, 5 and 6) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin, Total Protein, Albumin and Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV) at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin and Creatinine at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Total Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Basophil, Eosinophil, Monocyte and Platelet Count at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Non-serious Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious AE (SAE)
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range
NCT02191397 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior During Treatment Assessed by Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
NCT02389465 (3) [back to overview]IL10 Levels
NCT02389465 (3) [back to overview]IL-6 Levels
NCT02389465 (3) [back to overview]Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
NCT02473250 (4) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impression-1
NCT02473250 (4) [back to overview]Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
NCT02473250 (4) [back to overview]Young Mania Rating Scale
NCT02473250 (4) [back to overview]Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
NCT02579343 (2) [back to overview]Change of Mean Score of the Behavioral Health Measure-20 Between Baseline and End of Study
NCT02579343 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Score of the Sheehan Disability Scale Through 6 Weeks
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Cognitive Impairment Scale
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Short Form (SF)-12/36 Physical Function Over the Course of the Year After Injury
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C) Over the Course of the Year After Injury
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Item Depression Scale Over the Course of the Year After Injury
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Over the Course of the Year After Injury
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Brief Pain Inventory
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Overall Health Care
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Mental Health Care
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]SF-36 Quality of Life
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Stimulant Use
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Opioid Use
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Marijuana Use
NCT03388164 (2) [back to overview]Rate of Adherence
NCT03388164 (2) [back to overview]Adherence Consistency
NCT04476030 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the HAMD-17 Total Score Around End of Blinded Treatment
NCT04476030 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the HAMD-17 Total Score at Day 3
NCT04476030 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the HAMD-17 Total Score Over the Double-Blind Treatment Period
NCT04476030 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With MADRS Remission at Day 15
NCT04476030 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With MADRS Response at Day 15
NCT04476030 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CGI-S Score at Day 15
NCT04476030 (16) [back to overview]Time to First HAMD-17 Response
NCT04476030 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the HAMD-17 Total Score at Days 15 and 42
NCT04476030 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT04476030 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CGI-I Response, at Day 3 and Day 15
NCT04476030 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HAMD-17 Remission at Day 15 and Day 42
NCT04476030 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HAMD-17 Response at Day 15 and Day 42
NCT04476030 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Graded by Severity
NCT04476030 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Depressive Symptoms at Day 15, as Assessed by PHQ-9
NCT04476030 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HAM-A Total Score at Day 15
NCT04476030 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at Day 15

Number of Adverse Events (Physical Symptoms) Emerging or Worsening During 12 Weeks of Treatment

We expect that subjects treated for Minor Depression for 12 weeks with either St. John's Wort or citalopram will have similar safety profiles to subjects treated with placebo, and will not differ by more than 20% in rates of adverse side effects (e.g., nausea, headache, insomnia, hypersomnia, diarrhea) from subjects treated with placebo. This was measured by the number of adverse events (physical symptoms) emerging or worsening during 12 weeks of treatment. (NCT00048815)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline to Week 12

InterventionNumber of events (Mean)
Citalopram4.7
St. John's Wort5.0
Placebo3.4

[back to top]

Efficacy Assessed Using the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Rated (IDS-C)

We expect that subjects with minor depression treated for 12 weeks with St. John's Wort or citalopram will have significantly greater reduction in depressive symptom severity than those treated with placebo. This will be measured by blind ratings on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Rated (IDS-C) which has a total score range from 0 to 84 with 0 being not depressed at all and 84 being the most depressed. The change will be calculated by subtracting the Week 12 score from the Baseline score. (NCT00048815)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline to Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram-11.47
St. John's Wort-9.35
Placebo-10.49

[back to top]

Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS)

"OCD symptom severity was measured using the CY-BOCS, an interviewer-rated instrument that assess obsessions and compulsions separately on time consumed, distress, interference, degree of resistance, and control; it yields separate severity scores for obsessions and for compulsions (0 - 20), and a composite symptom severity score (0 to 40).~Consistent with signal detection analyses examining the optimal criterion for treatment response, a CY-BOCS reduction of 30% or more from baseline to week 12 was used as the criterion for RESPONSE and was the primary dichotomous outcome measure." (NCT00074815)
Timeframe: Measured at baseline and Week 12.

InterventionProportion of Participants with RESPONSE (Number)
MM + CBT0.69
MM + ICBT0.34
MM Only0.30

[back to top]

Remission of Depression (%)

"Percent of participants in depressive remission at 12 weeks. Remission of depression was required both an HRSD score ≤ 7 and absence of the two core symptoms of MDD based on the depression module of the SCID.~The HRSD (Hamilton Rating of Depression Scale) measure depressive symptom severity. TIt has 17 items. The score ranges between 0 and 48. A score below 7 represents minimal symptoms.~The SCID rates 9 symptoms of depression as present or absent. The two core symptoms of depression are sadness and anhedonia (low motivation and/or enjoyment in significant life domains)." (NCT00149825)
Timeframe: After 12 weeks or at the last available time point

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
MED+CBTI61.5
MED+CTRL33.3

[back to top]

Remission of Insomnia

Percent of participants in insomnia remission. Remission of insomnia was defined by an Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)score < 8. The ISI (Insomnia Severity index) scores range between 0 and 38. A score < 8 indicates absence of insomnia. (NCT00149825)
Timeframe: After 12 weeks or at the last available time point

Interventionpercent (Number)
MED+CBTI50.0
MED+CTRL7.7

[back to top]

Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

21 item patient rated assessment of depression symptoms, with item scores ranging from 0 to 3. Total BDI scores can range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating worse depression. (NCT00220701)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram15.00
Placebo16.25

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impressions - Severity (CGI-S)

Clinician rated severity, score on CGI-S scale ranging from 1 (no pathology) to 7 (extreme pathology) (NCT00220701)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram2.35
Placebo3.41

[back to top]

Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

21 item patient rated assessment of depression symptoms, with item scores ranging from 0 to 3. Total BDI scores can range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating worse depression. (NCT00220701)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram6.76
Placebo10.00

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impressions - Severity (CGI-S)

Clinician rated severity, score on CGI-S scale ranging from 1 (no pathology) to 7 (extreme pathology) (NCT00220701)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram4.06
Placebo4.06

[back to top]

Hamilton-Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-24 Items)

Clinician rated measure of depression, mean score; This study used the 24 item version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; item scores range from 0 to 4 on some items, 0 to 2 or 0 to 3 on other items; range of total score = 0 to 75, with higher score indicating worse depression Response (>50% decrease) Remission (score<=7) (NCT00220701)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram22.82
Placebo24.41

[back to top]

Hamilton-Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-24 Items)

Clinician rated measure of depression, mean score; This study used the 24 item version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; item scores range from 0 to 4 on some items, 0 to 2 or 0 to 3 on other items; range of total score = 0 to 75, with higher score indicating worse depression Response (>50% decrease) Remission (score<=7) (NCT00220701)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram10.88
Placebo16.41

[back to top]

Executive Function Composite Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort.

Full Scale Name: The Executive Composite Score (ECS). Definition: Subscales were averaged to compute this composite total score. The ECS is the weighted average of performance on 6 subtests of executive function, including (1) the Controlled Oral Word Association Test, (2) Symbol Digit Modalities test; (3) Stroop Color Word Test (Interference Trial), (4) Trail Making test (Part B), (5) Letter-Number Sequencing, and (6) Animal Naming. Construct Measured: Thinking tasks involving planning, working memory, attention, problem solving, verbal reasoning, inhibition, mental flexibility, and task switching. ECS Scale Range: The ECS score ranges from -5 to +5 on a standardized (Z) score scale, where lower scores indicate poorer performance on executive functioning tasks. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in executive functioning performance from visit 2 (week 0) to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) & 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort. (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram0.005
Placebo0.172

[back to top]

Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression Comparing Screening (Intake Visit) to Visit 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

Full Scale Name: Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Definition: The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression is a clinician-administered multiple item questionnaire used to provide an indication of depression. Construct Measured: Depression. HAM-D Score Range: Raw scores may range from 0 to 54, where higher scores indicate worsening mood. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in mood from screening (intake visit) to visit 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort. (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram-0.67
Placebo1.23

[back to top]

Letter Number Sequencing Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

Full Scale Name: Letter Number Sequencing (LNS) subtest from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) third edition. Definition: LNS is a task that requires the reordering of an initially unordered set of letters and numbers. Construct Measured: Working memory. LNS Score Range: Raw scores may range from 0 to 21, where lower scores indicate poorer performance in working memory. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in working memory performance from visit 2 (week 0) to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) & 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort. (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram-0.113
Placebo0.225

[back to top]

Semantic Fluency Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

Semantic Fluency Score. Definition: The Semantic Fluency Score is the number of words a person can produce given a category, including naming (1) Animal names, (2) Fruit names, (3) Boy names, (4) Girl names, and (5) Vegetable names. Construct Measured: Working memory and verbal initiation. Scale Range: The Semantic Fluency Score ranges from -5 to +5 on a standardized (Z) score scale, where lower scores indicate poorer performance on working memory tasks. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in working memory performance from visit 2 (week 0) where patients named fruit names to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) & 6 (week 15) where patients named girl names and vegetable names respectively for the citalopram versus placebo cohort. (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram0.386
Placebo0.664

[back to top]

Stroop Interference Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

"Full Scale Name: Stroop Interference subtest from The Stroop Color and Word Test. Definition: Participants are asked to name the ink color in which a word is printed when the word itself (which is irrelevant to the task) is the name of a different color rather than the same color. For example, participants may be asked to say red to the word blue printed in red ink. Constructs Measured: Selective attention, response inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and processing speed. Scale Range: The Stroop Interference score ranges from -5 to +5 on a standardized (Z) score scale, where lower scores indicate poorer performance. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in attention and processing speed performance from visit 2 (week 0) to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) and 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort." (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram-0.256
Placebo-0.046

[back to top]

Subgroup Analysis of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Comparing Screening (Intake Visit) to Visit 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

Full Scale Name: Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Definition: The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression is a clinician-administered multiple item questionnaire used to provide an indication of depression. Construct Measured: Depression. HAM-D Score Range: Raw scores may range from 0 to 54, where higher scores indicate worsening mood. Change Calculation Details: This analysis was restricted to a subgroup and, accordingly, does not reflect the total number of participants as reported in the Participant Flow. This analysis compares change in mood from screening (intake visit) to visit 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort. (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram-0.10
Placebo1.50

[back to top]

Symbol-Digit Modalities Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

Full Scale Name: The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Definition: The SDMT screens for organic cerebral dysfunction by having the examinee use a reference key to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures in 90 seconds. Construct Measured: Attention, processing speed, and working memory. SDMT Scale Range: Raw scores may range from 0 to 110, where lower scores indicate poorer performance. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in performance from visit 2 (week 0) to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) & 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort. (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram-0.227
Placebo-0.170

[back to top]

Total Functional Capacity Score Comparing Baseline (Week -4) to Visits 4 (Week 6) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

Full Scale Name: The Total Functional Capacity (TFC) subscale from the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS). Definition: The TFC is a score that classifies five stages of Huntington's Disease and five levels of function in the domains of workplace, finances, domestic chores, activities of daily living and requirements for unskilled or skilled care. Construct Measured: Activities of Daily Living. Scale Range: The TFC score ranges from 0 to 13, where lower scores indicate poorer performance in activities of daily living. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in TFC performance from Baseline (week -4) to the weighted average of visits 4 (week 6) and 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort. (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram-0.54
Placebo-0.06

[back to top]

Trails B Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

"Full Scale Name: Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B). Definition: The TMT-B test requires participants to connect-the-dots of 25 consecutive targets on a sheet of paper where the subject alternates between numbers and letters, going in both numerical and alphabetical order. Constructs Measured: Attention, set shifting, and processing speed. Scale range: The TMT-B score ranges from -5 to +5 on a standardized (Z) score scale, where lower scores indicate poorer performance. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in attention and processing speed performance from visit 2 (week 0) to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) and 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort." (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram0.087
Placebo0.405

[back to top]

Verbal Fluency Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

Full Scale Name: The Verbal Fluency Score (VFC). Definition: The VFC is the number of words a person can produce given a letter, including (1) Naming words that start with F, A, and S; (2) naming words that start with K, W, and R; (3) naming words that start with V, I, and P; (4) naming words that start with O, G, and B; (5) naming words that start with E, N, and T; and (6) naming words that start with J, C, and S. Construct Measured: Verbal initiation and flexibility. Scale Range: The Verbal Fluency Composite Score ranges from -5 to +5 on a standardized (Z) score scale, where lower scores indicate poorer performance. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in verbal initiation and flexibility from visit 2 (week 0) where patients named words starting with O, G, and B to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) and 6 (week 15) where patients named words starting with E, N, and T, and J, C, and S respectively for the citalopram versus placebo cohort. (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram0.140
Placebo0.071

[back to top]

Serum Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Levels

"Pre-SSRI BDNF Level refers to the data collection point before SSRI intake and Post-SSRI BDNF Level refers to the data collection point 8 weeks after SSRI intake." (NCT00361218)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Pre-SSRI BDNF LevelPost-SSRI BDNF Level
Open-label Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)6077.2704393.24

[back to top]

Quick Inventory of Depression- Self Report 16

"Quick Inventory of Depression- Self Report assesses 16 depressive symptoms experienced in the past week, based on self-rating, measured at study exit visit~Scale range:~Each of the four possible answers to each quiz is given an ascending numerical value from 0 to 3, and the total test score is the sum of the following: The highest number from questions 1-4 The number from question 5 The highest number from questions 6-9 The total of each question from 10-14 The highest number from questions 15-16~Total scoring ranges (0-48):~0-5, No Depression Likely 6-10, Possibly Mildly Depressed 11-15, Moderate Depression 16-20, Severe Depression 21 or Over, Very Severe Depression" (NCT00369746)
Timeframe: study exit visit, at Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Alcoholic9.3
Major Depression Only8.9

[back to top]

Quantitative Substance Use Inventory ((SUI)

"Quantitative Substance Use Inventory ((SUI) Measure substance use~Administered at either week 12 or 14: Any Illicit Drug Using in last 30 days" (NCT00369746)
Timeframe: 30 days

InterventionDays (Mean)
Alcoholic2.4

[back to top]

Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) Maximum Drinks Per Drinking Day

This variable reports maximum drinks per drinking day in a pre-defined time frame. (NCT00369746)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventiondrinks (Mean)
Alcoholic4.9

[back to top]

Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) Average Drinks Per Drinking Day

This variable reports average drinks/drinking day in a pre-defined time frame. (NCT00369746)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventiondrinks per drinking day (Mean)
Alcoholic2.9

[back to top]

Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) Drinking Days Per 30 Days

This variable reports drinking days in a pre-defined time frame. (NCT00369746)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventiondays (Mean)
Alcoholic8.1

[back to top]

Side Effect Burden

Side efect burden was defined as the total score of the UKU Side Effects Rating Scale. This scale contains 48 items corresponding to side effects which are rated from 0-3, with 0 meaning not present and 1-3 rating the severity of the side effect. Higher scores represented greater side effect burden. The scale range is 0 to 144. (NCT00387348)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-Placebo3.00
Placebo-Escitalopram2.50
Escitalopram-Placebo3.44

[back to top]

Depression Response Rate of Escitalopram Oxalate 10 mg Once Daily Compared to Placebo Once Daily for Major Depressive Disorder

Response rate was defined as a 50% reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) scores over 4 weeks. The HAM-D can have total scores that range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater depression. Scores over 14 are considered to be in the depressed range. (NCT00387348)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionnumber of participants with response (Number)
Placebo-Placebo3
Placebo-Escitalopram1
Escitalopram-Placebo6

[back to top]

Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Scores

The change in HAM-D scores was calculated by subtracting the score at 4 weeks from the score at baseline. The HAM-D can have total scores that range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater depression. Scores over 14 are considered to be in the depressed range. (NCT00387348)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

InterventionChange in HAM-D scores (Mean)
Placebo-Placebo6.23
Placebo-Escitalopram10.60
Escitalopram-Placebo6.45

[back to top]

Total Drinks Consumed Per Week on the TLFB

Total Drinks Consumed per Week on the Time Line Follow Back. We measure the change from Baseline to Week 12 or week of early termination visit. (NCT00452543)
Timeframe: From Baseline visit to Week 12 (or early discontinuation visit)

InterventionDrinks consumed per week (Mean)
Escitalopram Plus Acamprosate15
Escitalopram Plus Placebo15

[back to top]

Total Drinking Days on the Alcohol Timeline Followback (TLFB)

The TLFB assesses recent drinking behavior. On the TLFB, clients retrospectively estimate their daily alcohol consumption in standard drinks over a time period ranging from 7 days to 24 months prior to the interview, and thus the measure provides quantitative estimates of alcohol use. One standard drink on the TLFB was defined as: 12 oz beer (5% alcohol by volume), 5 oz of wine (10-12% abv), 3 oz of fortified wine (16-18% abv), or 1-1.2 oz of hard liquor (86-100 proof; 43-50% abv). We measure the change from Baseline to Week 12 or week of early termination visit. (NCT00452543)
Timeframe: From Baseline visit to Week 12 (or early discontinuation visit)

InterventionDrinking days (Mean)
Escitalopram Plus Acamprosate61
Escitalopram Plus Placebo61

[back to top]

Total Drinks Consumed Per Drinking Day on the TLFB

Total Drinks Consumed per Drinking Day on the Time Line Follow Back. We measure the change from Baseline to Week 12 or week of early termination visit. (NCT00452543)
Timeframe: From Baseline visit to Week 12 (or early discontinuation visit)

InterventionDrinks consumed per drinking day (Mean)
Escitalopram Plus Acamprosate4
Escitalopram Plus Placebo4

[back to top]

Change in Mean Score on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression -- 17 Items (HAM-D-17)

Scores on the HAM-D-17 typically fall into the following ranges: a) Not depressed: 0-7; b) Mildly depressed: 7-15; c) Moderately depressed: 15-25; d) Severely depressed: over 25. A decrease of 50% or more in the Hamilton-D score is considered to be a positive response to treatment, while a score of 7 or less is considered typical of remission. We measure the change in total score from Baseline to Week 12 or week of early termination visit. (NCT00452543)
Timeframe: From baseline visit to Week 12 (or early discontinuation visit)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram Plus Acamprosate-5.6
Escitalopram Plus Placebo-7.8

[back to top]

"Count of Participants Who Self-reported Adequate Relief"

Participants were asked weekly to answer subjectively whether weekly adequate relief from IBS symptoms was achieved. Overall response was defined as having achieved adequate relief in at least 3 of the past 6 weeks. (NCT00477165)
Timeframe: Baseline, weekly for 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Citalopram12
Placebo15

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IBS-QOL Score at Week 8

The IBS-QOL is a self-report quality-of-life measure specific to Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) that can be used to assess the impact of IBS and its treatment. The IBS-QOL consists of 34 statements about bowel problems, each with a five-point response scale ranging from 1 (no problems) to 5 (most problems). The individual scores are summed and averaged for a total score, then transformed to a 0-100 scale for ease of interpretation with higher scores indicating better IBS-specific quality of life. (NCT00477165)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Citalopram6.3
Placebo7.6

[back to top]

Mean Sensation Score as a Function of Distending Pressure at the End of the Study

A 500mL polyethylene bag was passed into the rectum, with tubing connected to a barostat, which was controlled by a computer that recorded bag pressure, volume, and corrected volume every second. After 5 minutes, the bag was unfurled with 100mL of air and deflated; with inflations lasting 45 seconds from 0 up to 60 mmHg, increasing by 3 mmHg, and separated by 45-second deflations, subjects rated sensation 30 seconds into each inflation. Sensation score scale: 0=no inflation sensation, 1-5=increasing painless sensation, 6=threshold pain, 10=worst imaginable pain. (NCT00477165)
Timeframe: Week 8

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Distending pressure 12mmHgDistending pressure 24mmHgDistending pressure 36mmHgDistending pressure 48mmHg
Citalopram1457
Placebo2676

[back to top]

Urgency Score as a Function of Distending Pressure at the End of the Study

A 500mL polyethylene bag was passed into the rectum, with tubing connected to a barostat, which was controlled by a computer that recorded bag pressure, volume, and corrected volume every second. After 5 minutes, the bag was unfurled with 100mL of air and deflated; with inflations lasting 45 seconds from 0 up to 60 mmHg, increasing by 3 mmHg, and separated by 45-second deflations, subjects rated urgency for bowel movement 30 seconds into each inflation. Urgency score scale: 0=no urgency, 1=threshold urgency, 5=worst imaginable urgency. (NCT00477165)
Timeframe: Week 8

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Distending pressure 12mmHgDistending pressure 24mmHgDistending pressure 36mmHgDistending pressure 48mmHg
Citalopram1445
Placebo2555

[back to top]

Functioning, as Measured by the Social Adjustment Scale (SAS) Summary Score

Social adjustment was measured using the Social Adjustment Scale (SAS). The SAS is a self-report scale that assesses depressive symptoms and functioning in nine social and work-related domains generating a total score that is indicative of a subject's overall level of social adjustment. Subjects rate their own social functioning over times on a 5-point scale on items covering work for pay, housework, extended family, parenting, marital status, social activity and leisure, family unit and student status (sub-scales). Mean values of all the sub-scales are used, with a range from 0-5. Higher score = worse outcome … worse functioning (NCT00519428)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunits on the SAS scale (Mean)
Escitalopram + Bupropion2.65
Escitalopram2.63
Bupropion2.74

[back to top]

Quality of Life, as Measured by the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Short Form (SF)

"The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) intends to measure quality of life in 16 domains. A summary score is computed by adding the scores and dividing by 16 (or the number of answered items if some are not answered).~The minimum raw score on the Q-LES-Q-SF is 14, and the maximum score is 70. Higher score means more satisfaction." (NCT00519428)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunits on the Q-LES-Q scale (Mean)
Escitalopram + Bupropion3.0
Escitalopram3.0
Bupropion3.1

[back to top]

Remission: Persistent Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17 Items (HAM-D 17) <= 7, With no HAM-D 17 >7 Through Week 12

Chi square comparison of rates of persistent remission (i.e., no subsequent Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17 items [HAMD-D 17] > 7 once HAMD-D 17 <= 7); Dual rate vs. Escitalopram only rate and Dual rate vs. Bupropion only rate. (NCT00519428)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Escitalopram + Bupropion52
Escitalopram46
Bupropion34

[back to top]

Severity of Depressive Symptoms as Measured by Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D 17)

"Last summary score rating on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression Eight items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 = not present to 4 = severe. Nine are scored from 0-2. Range 0-58.~0-7 = Normal 8-13 = Mild Depression 14-18 = Moderate Depression 19-22 = Severe Depression~≥ 23 = Very Severe Depression" (NCT00519428)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunits on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depre (Mean)
Escitalopram + Bupropion10
Escitalopram9
Bupropion12

[back to top]

Time to Remission, Defined by the Week of Onset of Persistent Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D 17) <= 7, With no Subsequent HAM-D 17 > 7

Life Table Survival Analysis run twice, once comparing Dual Therapy (i.e., Bupropion + Escitalopram) to Bupropion alone (i.e., Bupropion + Placebo) and once comparing Dual Therapy to Escitalopram alone (i.e., Escitalopram + Placebo). Because both analyses must significantly favor Dual Therapy, each individual analysis must reach a critical alpha = .0916 in order to reach an over-all alpha = .05. (NCT00519428)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionweeks (Mean)
Escitalopram + Bupropion8
Escitalopram9
Bupropion10

[back to top]

MADRS Rating Scale Change

Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating scale assessed in mixed effects regression model. The total range for the scale is 0 to 60. Lower values involve less depression, while higher values involve worse depression. The change in the MADRS scale is interpreted as higher values meaning better outcomes, because more depressive symptoms are improved. (NCT00562861)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Citalopram13.1
Placebo15.2

[back to top]

Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms

Percentage of patients that achieve remission, as defined as QIDS total score below 6 for last 2 study visits. QIDS depression scores range from 0 (normal) to 27 (very severe). (NCT00590863)
Timeframe: Measured at Month 7

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Escitalopram + Bupropion SR46.6
Venlafaxine XR + Mirtazapine41.8
Escitalopram + Placebo46.0

[back to top]

Quality of Life Inventory

The Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI) is a 32-item comprehensive self-report of satisfaction in 16 areas of life, such as love, work, and health. Each area is rated in terms of satisfaction and the relationship of that area to overall quality of life. It yields an overall raw score and satisfaction ratings for the 16 individual areas of life. The QOLI raw score is an average of weighted satisfaction ratings computed only over areas of life judged to be Important or Extremely Important to the respondent. Higher scores indicate higher reported quality of life. (NCT00590863)
Timeframe: Measured at Month 7

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram + Bupropion SR0.6
Venlafaxine XR + Mirtazapine0.4
Escitalopram + Placebo0.4

[back to top]

Quality of Life Assessment

The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) is a 16 item self-administered questionnaire that captures life satisfaction over the past week. Each question is rated on a 5 point scale from 1 (Very Poor) to 5 (Very Good). The total score is reported for items 1-14. The minimum raw score on the Q-LES-Q-SF is 14, and the maximum score is 70 with higher values representing a better outcome. (NCT00602290)
Timeframe: Measured at Baseline and Week 16

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 16
1 - Citalopram + Placebo45.5054.45
2 - Methylphenidate + Placebo47.0653.54
3 - Methylphenidate + Citalopram47.5257.79

[back to top]

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) Maintained Scores at Week 16

The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) is a 24-item depression scale and the total score is summed with a minimum score=0 and maximum score=76. There are no subscales and the higher values represent a worse outcome. Outcomes are measured and defined as follows: 1) Response will be defined as HDRS scores of 10 or less; 2) Sustained response will be defined as maintained response at week 16; 4) Remission will be defined as HDRS scores of 6 or less. (NCT00602290)
Timeframe: Maintained response measured at Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
1 - Citalopram + Placebo18.3
2 - Methylphenidate + Placebo18.7
3 - Methylphenidate + Citalopram19.8

[back to top]

ACQ (Asthma Control Questionnaire)

The ACQ is a questionnaire used to assess symptoms pertinent to asthma management.Scores range from 0 to 42. The higher the score, the worse the asthma symptoms (worse outcome). The total ACQ score is obtained by dividing the raw score by the total number of items (in this case 7 items). (NCT00621946)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram1.9
Matching Placebo2.4

[back to top]

ACQ (Asthma Control Questionnaire)

The ACQ is a questionnaire used to assess symptoms pertinent to asthma management. Scores range from 0 to 42. The higher the score, the worse the asthma symptoms (worse outcome). The total ACQ score is obtained by dividing the raw score by the total number of items (in this case 7 items). (NCT00621946)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram1.9
Placebo2.9

[back to top]

HAM-D (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression)

The HAM-D is a 17 item questionnaire (a clinician-administered depression scale) designed to evaluate severity of depressive symptoms. Scores can range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the worse the depressive symptoms (worse outcome). (NCT00621946)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram24.8
Placebo28.3

[back to top]

IDS-SR (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report)

The IDS-SR is a 30 item (self-report questionnaire) designed to assess symptoms of depression. Scores range from 0 to 90. The higher the score, the worse the depressive symptoms (worse outcome). (NCT00621946)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram26.3
Matching Placebo24.6

[back to top]

IDS-SR (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report)

The IDS-SR is a 30 item (self-report questionnaire) designed to assess symptoms of depression. Scores range from 0 to 90. The higher the score, the worse the depressive symptoms (worse outcome). (NCT00621946)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram35.2
Placebo42.9

[back to top]

HAM-D (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression)

The HAM-D is a 17 item questionnaire (a clinician-administered depression scale) designed to evaluate severity of depressive symptoms. Scores can range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the worse the depressive symptoms (worse outcome). (NCT00621946)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram16.7
Matching Placebo17.7

[back to top]

Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q)

The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) measures satisfaction and enjoyment in various domains of functioning: physical health, feelings, work, household duties, school/course work, leisure time activities, social relations, and general activities. The raw score is converted into a percent of the maximum possible score and ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater enjoyment and satisfaction. (NCT00642694)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram + Ramelteon69.84
Escitalopram + Placebo70.24

[back to top]

Social Adjustment Scale - Self-Report (SAS-SR)

The Social Adjustment Scale - Self-Report (SAS-SR) is a 54-item self-report measure of instrumental and expressive role performance. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, and a mean item score (ranging from 1-5) is obtained, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. (NCT00642694)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

Interventionmean score on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram + Ramelteon2.09
Escitalopram + Placebo2.03

[back to top]

Percentage of Remitters on IDS-C30 at Week 12

Remission as defined by a score of <12 on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician-Rated version (IDS-C30) at Week 12; minimum possible score = 0, maximum possible score = 84; higher scores indicate worse symptom severity (NCT00642694)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Escitalopram + Ramelteon20
Escitalopram + Placebo36

[back to top]

Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item

The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression is a clinician-administered rating scale that assesses severity of depressive symptoms and is one of the most widely used and validated symptom severity measures for depression. Each of the 17 items is rated by the clinician on either a 3- or a 5 point scale. Total scores range from 0-52, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptoms. (NCT00642694)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram + Ramelteon8.33
Escitalopram + Placebo10.08

[back to top]

Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI)

The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) was used to report impairment while working or performing usual daily activities as a result of health problems. The activity impairment item (#6 of WPAI) is rated on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. Scores are multiplied by 10 to obtain percent impairment. (NCT00642694)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of time activity was impaired (Mean)
Escitalopram + Ramelteon40.00
Escitalopram + Placebo32.50

[back to top]

Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)

The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) is 5-item self-report measure designed to identify functional impairment that is attributed to an identified problem or condition. and has been used in studies of depression and anxiety. Scores range between 0-40, with higher scores indicating worse functioning. (NCT00642694)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram + Ramelteon15.56
Escitalopram + Placebo13.91

[back to top]

Sleep Latency

Number of minutes until fell asleep (NCT00642694)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Escitalopram + Ramelteon30.4
Escitalopram + Placebo15.8

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Benefits of Care (PPBC)

The Patient Perception of Benefits of Care (PPBC) assesses how much patients believe their quality of life will improve in response to medical care or treatment. Scores range between 10-50, with lower scores indicating greater belief that treatment will improve quality of life. (NCT00642694)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram + Ramelteon20.33
Escitalopram + Placebo20.08

[back to top]

Short-Form Health Survey - Version 2 (SF-36)

The Short-Form Health Survey - version 2 (SF-36) is a self-report inventory measuring different domains of health-related quality of life: Physical Functioning, Physical Role Functioning, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Emotional Role Functioning, and Mental Health. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived health and functioning. (NCT00642694)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Physical FunctioningSocial FunctioningPhysical Role FunctioningEmotional Role FunctioningMental HealthVitalityBodily PainGeneral Health
Escitalopram + Placebo88.3368.7586.1175.0070.4254.6987.9679.25
Escitalopram + Ramelteon80.5069.4475.0067.5968.0049.3875.3174.90

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week-12 Endpoint

Mean change from baseline to endpoint in systolic blood pressure (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionmillimeters of mmercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine0.58
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)0.55

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weight at Week-12 Endpoint

Mean change from baseline to endpoint in weight (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionkilograms (kg) (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-0.32
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-0.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Clinical Trials 7-Day Version (HPQ), Absenteeism at 12-Week Endpoint

Self-administered assessment used to determine a subject's work performance in terms of employment status, absenteeism if employed, productivity while at work, usual occupation, and annual income. Tool assesses the potential impact of change in depressive symptoms on work productivity and its associated employer costs. Defined on a 0-100 scale for the percentage of work days the respondent missed in the past 30 days. Absolute absenteeism: actual hours worked minus expected hours equals number of missed work days. Mean change baseline to endpoint is reported. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionhours lost per week (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-9.56
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)0.41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Clinical Trials 7-Day Version (HPQ), Dollars of Income Lost Due to Work Absenteeism Score at Week-12 Endpoint

Self-administered assessment used to determine a participant's work performance in terms of employment status, absenteeism if employed, productivity while at work, usual occupation, and annual income. Tool assesses the potential impact of change in depressive symptoms on work productivity and its associated employer costs. Scale ranges from 0 to 100% of work days in past 30 days. Absenteeism and presenteeism were combined into a measure of total lost work performance by adding absenteeism to the value ([100-absenteeism] × [100-presenteeism]). Mean change baseline to endpoint. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventiondollars (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-3978.98
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-1932.46

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Clinical Trials 7-Day Version (HPQ), Dollars of Income Lost Due to Work Presenteeism (WP)Score, at Week-12 Endpoint

WP score was calculated by taking midpoint of annual before-tax income reported on HPQ. A multiplier of 1.25 produced estimated direct & indirect (i.e. benefits) income. Annual hours expected to work were calculated from expected daily work hours, multiplied by 236 days. Hourly, indirect income was total direct + indirect income, divided by # of expected annual work hours. Indirect hours lost annually for WP=hours expected to be worked annually times WP percent, times hourly rate=dollars earned, and then subtracted from total direct + indirect income=dollars lost annually due to WP. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventiondollars (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine7250.93
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)5074.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Clinical Trials 7-Day Version (HPQ), Presenteeism Score, at Week-12 Endpoint

"Self-administered assessment used to determine a participant's work performance (employment status, absenteeism if employed, productivity while at work, usual occupation, & annual income). Tool assesses the potential impact of change in depressive symptoms on work productivity & its associated employer costs using a 0-100 scale in which 0 meant doing no work at all on days spent at work and 100 meant performing at the level of a top worker. Absolute presenteeism: difference between score for self and score for average worker in same job. Mean change baseline to endpoint is reported." (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine24.56
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)20.73

[back to top]

Probability of Remission [16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR) Score Less Than or Equal to 5 at 12-Week Endpoint]

Visitwise probability of participants per treatment meeting remission criteria (QIDS-SR total score [TS]NCT00666757)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionProbability of remission (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine0.36
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)0.32

[back to top]

Probability of Remission [17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) (Mood Measure) Less Than or Equal to 7 at 12-Week Endpoint]

Visitwise percentages of participants meeting remission criteria HAMD-17 total score [TS] NCT00666757)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionProbability of remission (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine0.53
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)0.44

[back to top]

Probability of Response [HAMD-17 Total Score (Mood Measure) Greater Than Or Equal To 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline To 12 Week Endpoint]

Visitwise percentages of participants meeting response criteria 50% reduction from baseline in HAMD-17 total score at 12-Week endpoint) were estimated using a categorical, pseudolike-lihood-based repeated measures approach, & included fixed, categorical effects of treatment group, visit, treatment group-by-visit interaction, & continuous, fixed covariate of baseline HAMD-17 TS. Primary analysis will be the contrast of response rates at week 12 endpoint between treatment groups, & represents estimated response rates for each treatment group had all participants completed 12 weeks of therapy. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12-Weeks

InterventionProbability of response (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine0.73
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)0.61

[back to top]

Probability of Response [QIDS-SR Total Score (Mood Measure) Greater Than Or Equal To 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline To 12 Week Endpoint]

Visitwise percentages of participants meeting response criteria (50% reduction from baseline QIDS-SR total score at 12-week endpoint) were estimated using a categorical, pseudolikelihood-based repeated measures approach, & included fixed, categorical effects of treatment group, visit, treatment group-by-visit interaction, & continuous, fixed covariate of baseline QIDS-SR. The primary analysis will be the contrast of response rates at week 12 endpoint between treatment groups, and represents estimated response rates for each treatment group had all participants completed 12 weeks of therapy. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12-Weeks

InterventionProbability of response (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine0.71
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)0.64

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week-12 Endpoint

Mean change from baseline to endpoint in pulse rate (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine2.74
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)0.47

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in BPI Average 24 Hour Pain Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Pain Measure)

The BPI is a self-reported scale measuring pain severity and pain-specific interference on function, with scores ranging from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). The BPI average 24-hour pain measure was used to derive the overall mean change from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-1.83
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-1.43

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Average 24-hour Pain Score, in Particpants With a Baseline BPI Average 24-hour Pain Score of 3 or Greater, at 12-Week Endpoint (Pain Measure)

The BPI is a self-reported scale measuring pain severity and pain-specific interference on function on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The BPI average 24-hour pain measure was used to derive the overall mean change from baseline to endpoint, in those participants who had a BPI average 24-hour pain score of 3 or greater at baseline. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-2.95
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-2.39

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week-12 Endpoint

Mean change from baseline to endpoint in diastolic blood pressure (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-0.14
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)0.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Anxiety/Somatization Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)

HAMD-17 subscale consists of items 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, and 17 evaluates agitation, and severity of psychic and somatic manifestations of anxiety. Total subscale scores range from 0 (normal) to 18 (severe). Mean change from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-4.89
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-4.24

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Bech Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)

HAMD-17 Bech subscale consists of items 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, and 13 used to evaluate core symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Total subscale scores range from 0 (normal) to 22 (severe). (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-9.21
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-8.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Maier Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)

"HAMD-17 Maier Subscale consists of Items 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10 and represents the core symptoms of depression. Total subscale scores range from 0 (normal) to 24 (severe)." (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-9.01
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-8.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Retardation Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)

The HAMD-17 Retardation subscale consists of Items 1, 7, 8, 14 and evaluates dysfunction in mood, work, and sexual activity, as well as overall motor retardation. Total subscale scores range from 0 (normal) to 14 (severe). (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-5.99
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-5.49

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Sleep Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)

The HAMD-17 Sleep Subscale consists of Items 4, 5, 6 and evaluates initial, middle, and late insomnia. Total subscale scores range from 0 (no difficulty) to 6 (difficulty). (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-2.77
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-2.58

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Total Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)

The HAMD-17 is a rater-administered assessment of depression severity and improvement, with total score ranges from 0 (not at all depressed) to 52 (most severely depressed). (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-17.03
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-15.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in QIDS-SR Total Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)

The QIDS-SR is a 16-item, participant-rated short form of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology that assesses 9 domains: sad mood, concentration, self-outlook, suicidal ideation, involvement, energy/fatigability, sleep disturbance, appetite/weight increase/decrease and psychomotor agitation/retardation. Scores range from 0 (none) to 27 (very severe). The QIDS-SR total score was used to derive the mean change from baseline to endpoint depression. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-13.4
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-12.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SDS Social Item Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Functional Outcome Measure)

The SDS is completed by the participant and is used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on their work/social/family life. Total scores range from 0 to 30 with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's work/social/family life. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-4.69
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-4.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SDS Work/School Item Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Functional Outcome Measure)

The SDS is completed by the participant and Item 1 is used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on their work/school schedule. Scores range from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's work/school life. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-4.52
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-3.85

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Family/Home Item Score at Week-12 Endpoint (Functional Outcome Measure)

The SDS is completed by the participant and Item 3 is used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on their family life/home responsibilities. Scores range from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's family life/home responsibilities. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-4.51
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-3.94

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Functional Outcome Measure)

The SDS is a participant-rated anchored visual analog scale to assess disability across the three domains of work/school, social life, and family life, with each item scored from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very severely), with a summarization of the 3 items to evaluate global functioning. The Global Functional Impairment Score is a total score score that ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired), and was used to derived the mean change from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-13.56
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-11.53

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at 8 Weeks.

The MADRS is a 10-item clinician-rated scale that was used to assess depressive symptomatology over the patient's prior week. Patients were rated on 10 items designed to assess feelings of sadness, lassitude, pessimism, inner tension, suicidality, reduced sleep or appetite, difficulty concentrating, and lack of interest. Each item was scored on a 7-point Likert scale; a score of 0 indicated the absence of symptoms, and a score of 6 indicated symptoms of maximum severity. The total score range is 0 to 60 (higher score indicates a greater severity of symptoms). (NCT00668525)
Timeframe: Change from baseline in MADRS total score at week 8

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram Low Dose-12.8
Escitalopram High Dose-13.4
Placebo-10.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hamiltion Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) at Week 8

The HAMD is a clinician-rated 24-item scale was used to rate the patient's depressive state. It was also used to identify obsessive-compulsive, genital, and somatic symptoms, as well as diurnal variation in the presence of symptoms. Each item was scored on a 3, 4 or 5-point Likert scale. A score of 0 indicated the absence of symptoms, and a score of 2, 3 or 4 indicated symptoms of maximum severity. The total score range is 0 to 74 (higher score indicates a greater depressive state). (NCT00668525)
Timeframe: Change from baseline in HAM-D at week 8

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Escitalopram Low Dose-11.5
Escitalopram High Dose-11.6
Placebo-8.5

[back to top]

"Percentage of Participants That Much Improved (Score of 2) in, or Completely Recovered (Score of 1) From Their Irritability Severity, as Measured With the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)."

"A measure of change of irritability severity taking the baseline before randomization as a reference. Scores range 1 to 8, in which 1=Completely recovered,... 5=Unchanged,... 8=Much worse.~Percentage of participants who responded are based on an estimation and might not match exactly with discrete numbers of participants based on the denominator." (NCT00794040)
Timeframe: Collected weekly during the 8-week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported.

Interventionestimated percentage of participants (Number)
Add-on Citalopram Following Optimized Methylphenidate35
Add-on Placebo Following Optimized Methylphenidate6

[back to top]

Irritability Severity at 8th Week of Trial.

Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S): A measure of severity of irritability scale (from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill patients). (NCT00794040)
Timeframe: Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Add-on Citalopram Following Optimized Methylphenidate3.1
Add-on Placebo Following Optimized Methylphenidate3.9

[back to top]

Functional Impairment at 8th Week of Trial

Difference in functional impairment at 8th week of trial as measured with Children's Global Impression Scale (CGAS) with scores ranging from 1=Most impaired to 100=Not impaired at all. (NCT00794040)
Timeframe: Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Add-on Citalopram Following Optimized Methylphenidate52.6
Add-on Placebo Following Optimized Methylphenidate47.2

[back to top]

Depressive Symptoms at 8th Week of Trial

Difference in depressive symptoms at 8th week of trial as measured with Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS) with scores ranging 17-113, where scores >40 are considered over the clinical threshold, and scores <28 are considered within the healthy range. (NCT00794040)
Timeframe: Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Add-on Citalopram Following Optimized Methylphenidate28.6
Add-on Placebo Following Optimized Methylphenidate30.1

[back to top]

Anxiety Symptoms at 8th Week of Trial

Difference in anxiety symptoms at 8th week of trial as measured with the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) with scores ranging 0-25. Higher values represent a worse outcome. (NCT00794040)
Timeframe: Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Add-on Citalopram Following Optimized Methylphenidate12.0
Add-on Placebo Following Optimized Methylphenidate13.4

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I)

The CGI-I provides the clinician's impression of the patient's improvement (or worsening). The clinician assesses the patient's condition relative to a baseline on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). (NCT00807248)
Timeframe: at Week 8

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)2.97
Escitalopram 20 mg and Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)2.21
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 5 mg (Orally, Once Daily)2.35
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 10 mg (Orally, Once Daily)2.26

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S)

The CGI-S provides the clinician's impression of the patient's current state of mental illness. The clinician uses his or her clinical experience of this patient population to rate the severity of the patient's current mental illness on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (Normal - not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). (NCT00807248)
Timeframe: Mean change from baseline to Week 8

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)-1.04
Escitalopram 20 mg and Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)-1.65
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 5 mg (Orally, Once Daily)-1.58
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 10 mg (Orally, Once Daily)-1.76

[back to top]

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

The HADS is a patient-rated scale designed to screen for anxiety and depressive states in medical patients. It consists of two sub-scales: the D-scale measures depression and the A-scale measures anxiety. Each sub-scale contains 7 items, and each item is rated from 0 (absent) to 3 (maximum severity). The score of each sub-scale ranges from 0 to 21, and are analysed separately. The total HADS score ranges from 0 to 42. (NCT00807248)
Timeframe: Mean change from baseline to Week 8

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)-9.7
Escitalopram 20 mg and Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)-14.7
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 5 mg (Orally, Once Daily)-14.1
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 10 mg (Orally, Once Daily)-15.0

[back to top]

Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)

The ISI is both a brief screening measure of insomnia and an outcomes measure for use in treatment research. It is a brief self-report instrument measuring the patient's perception of his or her insomnia, and it comprises 7 items. Each item is rated on a 0-4 scale and the total score ranges from 0 to 28. 0 = no symptoms and 28 = severe symptoms. (NCT00807248)
Timeframe: Mean change from baseline to Week 8

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)-6.9
Escitalopram 20 mg and Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)-10.0
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 5 mg (Orally, Once Daily)-9.6
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 10 mg (Orally, Once Daily)-10.6

[back to top]

MADRS

The MADRS is a 10-item rating scale designed to assess the severity of the symptoms in depressive illness and to be sensitive to treatment effects. Symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale from 0 (no symptom) to 6 (severe symptom). Definitions of severity are provided at 2-point intervals. The total score of the 10 items ranges from 0 to 60. (NCT00807248)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 8

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)-13.4
Escitalopram 20 mg and Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)-19.0
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 5 mg (Orally, Once Daily)-18.5
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 10 mg (Orally, Once Daily)-19.4

[back to top]

Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

The MADRS is a 10-item rating scale designed to assess the severity of the symptoms in depressive illness and to be sensitive to treatment effects. Symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale from 0 (no symptom) to 6 (severe symptom). Definitions of severity are provided at 2-point intervals. The total score of the 10 items ranges from 0 to 60. (NCT00807248)
Timeframe: Baseline to 8 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)-13.4
Escitalopram 20 mg and Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)-19.0
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 5 mg (Orally, Once Daily)-18.5
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 10 mg (Orally, Once Daily)-19.4

[back to top]

SDS: Social Subscale

The SDS comprises self-rated items designed to measure impairment. The patient rates the extent to which his or her (1) work, (2) social life or leisure activities and (3) home life or family responsibilities are impaired on a 10-point visual analogue scales, on which 0 = normal functioning and 10 = severe functional impairment. (NCT00807248)
Timeframe: Mean change from baseline to Week 8

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)-2.7
Escitalopram 20 mg and Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)-3.9
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 5 mg (Orally, Once Daily)-3.8
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 10 mg (Orally, Once Daily)-4.1

[back to top]

SDS: Work Subscale

The SDS comprises self-rated items designed to measure impairment. The patient rates the extent to which his or her (1) work, (2) social life or leisure activities and (3) home life or family responsibilities are impaired on a 10-point visual analogue scales, on which 0 = normal functioning and 10 = severe functional impairment. (NCT00807248)
Timeframe: Mean change from baseline to Week 8

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)-2.7
Escitalopram 20 mg and Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)-3.8
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 5 mg (Orally, Once Daily)-3.8
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 10 mg (Orally, Once Daily)-4.0

[back to top]

Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS): Family Subscale

The SDS comprises self-rated items designed to measure impairment. The patient rates the extent to which his or her (1) work, (2) social life or leisure activities and (3) home life or family responsibilities are impaired on a 10-point visual analogue scales, on which 0 = normal functioning and 10 = severe functional impairment. (NCT00807248)
Timeframe: Mean change from baseline to Week 8

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)-2.8
Escitalopram 20 mg and Placebo (Orally, Once Daily)-4.0
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 5 mg (Orally, Once Daily)-3.9
Escitalopram 20 mg and Gaboxadol 10 mg (Orally, Once Daily)-4.1

[back to top]

Number of Voxels Showing Greater Activation Following Citalopram Compared With Placebo When Affective Faces Are Presented in a Covert Stimulus Presentation and Contrasted With a Fixation Stimulus.

Activation was measured using BOLD fMRI in response to affective (happy and fearful) faces presented in a covert or masked presentation and contrasted with activation in response to a neutral fixation stimulus. The response following two weeks of citalopram was compared to the response following two weeks of placebo. The cluster of differential activation was located in the right lateral occipital cortex. (NCT00825825)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionvoxels (Number)
All Participants With Complete Usable Data253

[back to top]

Number of Voxels Showing Greater Activation Following Citalopram Compared With Placebo When Affective Faces Are Presented in a Covert Stimulus Presentation and Contrasted With a Fixation Stimulus.

Activation was measured using BOLD fMRI in response to affective (happy and fearful) faces presented in a covert or masked presentation and contrasted with activation in response to a neutral fixation stimulus. The response following two weeks of citalopram was compared to the response following two weeks of placebo. The cluster of differential activation was located in the right occipital fusiform gyrus. (NCT00825825)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionvoxels (Number)
All Participants With Complete Usable Data658

[back to top]

Number of Voxels Showing Greater Activation Following Escitalopram Compared With Citalopram When Affective Words Are Contrasted With a Fixation Stimulus.

Activation was measured using BOLD fMRI in response to affective words contrasted with activation in response to a neutral fixation stimulus. The response following two weeks of escitalopram was compared to the response following two weeks of citalopram. The cluster of differential activation was located in the left primary visual cortex. (NCT00825825)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionvoxels (Number)
All Participants With Complete Usable Data289

[back to top]

Number of Voxels Showing Greater Activation Following Escitalopram Compared With Citalopram When Faces and a Fixation Stimulus Are Presented in an Overt Presentation.

Activation was measured using BOLD fMRI in response to affective faces and a fixation stimulus presented in an overt or unmasked presentation. The response following two weeks of escitalopram was compared to the response following two weeks of citalopram. The cluster of differential activation was located in the right insular cortex. (NCT00825825)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionvoxels (Number)
All Participants With Complete Usuable Data735

[back to top]

Number of Voxels Showing Greater Activation Following Escitalopram Compared With Placebo When Affective Faces Are Presented in a Covert Stimulus Presentation and Contrasted With a Fixation Stimulus.

Activation was measured using BOLD fMRI in response to affective (happy and fearful) faces presented in a covert or masked presentation and contrasted with activation in response to a neutral fixation stimulus. The response following two weeks of escitalopram was compared to the response following two weeks of placebo. The cluster of differential activation was located in the right inferior lateral occipital cortex. (NCT00825825)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionvoxels (Number)
All Participants With Complete Usable Data396

[back to top]

Number of Voxels Showing Greater Activation Following Placebo Compared With Citalopram When Affective Words Are Contrasted With a Fixation Stimulus.

Activation was measured using BOLD fMRI in response to affective words contrasted with activation in response to a neutral fixation stimulus. The response following two weeks of placebo was compared to the response following two weeks of citalopram. The cluster of differential activation was located in the right lingual gyrus and right superior lateral occipital cortex. (NCT00825825)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionvoxels (Number)
All Participants With Complete Usable Data619

[back to top]

Number of Voxels Showing Greater Activation Following Escitalopram Compared With Citalopram When Happy and Fearful Faces Are Presented in a Rapid Covert Stimulus Presentation.

Activation was measured using BOLD fMRI in response to happy and fearful faces presented in a rapid covert or masked presentation. The response following two weeks of escitalopram was compared to the response following two weeks of citalopram. The cluster of differential activation was located in the left middle temporal gyrus. (NCT00825825)
Timeframe: two weeks

Interventionvoxels (Number)
All Participants With Complete Usable Data478

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Suicide Events

Data on suicidal behavior was collected with the Columbia Suicide History Interview (CSHI), a semi-structured interview developed by our group. It is used to elicit history of the individual's actual suicide attempts , as well as specific questions concerning the circumstances surrounding any suicidal behavior and its degree of medical lethality. In addition to obtaining measurements of actual suicide attempts, the CSHI also captures suicide-related behaviors such as aborted and interrupted suicide attempts. An actual suicide attempt is operationally defined by the CSHI as a self-injurious act performed with at least some intent to die. (NCT00834834)
Timeframe: measured after 6 months of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Fluoxetine6
Dialectical Behavior Therapy4

[back to top]

Suicide Events

Data on suicidal behavior was collected with the Columbia Suicide History Interview (CSHI), a semi-structured interview developed by our group. It is used to elicit history of the individual's actual suicide attempts , as well as specific questions concerning the circumstances surrounding any suicidal behavior and its degree of medical lethality. In addition to obtaining measurements of actual suicide attempts, the CSHI also captures suicide-related behaviors such as aborted and interrupted suicide attempts. An actual suicide attempt is operationally defined by the CSHI as a self-injurious act performed with at least some intent to die. (NCT00834834)
Timeframe: Measured after 6 months of treatment

Interventionsuicide events (Number)
Fluoxetine12
Dialectical Behavior Therapy4

[back to top]

Hamilton Anxiety Scale

Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) was utilized. Scores range from 0-56, with higher scores indicating more anxiety. The change score utilized baseline and Day 56 (week 8) scores. The change scores was HAMA day 1 less Ham A day 56 / HAMA Day 1. Thus, larger numbers equal a greater reduction in anxiety. (NCT00896441)
Timeframe: % change in anxiety from Day 1 to Day 56 (week 8)

Interventionpercentage of change in anxiety (Mean)
Depressed.3988

[back to top]

Voxel-wise Changes in Resting State Functional Connectivity to the Posterior Cingulate Cortex

The dependent variable, measured in more than 30,000 voxels across the whole brain, was the functional connectivity between the posterior cingulate cortex seed region and each voxel. This is derived as the correlation coefficient between the blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal timeseries in the seed region and the BOLD signal timeseries in each voxel. (NCT00896441)
Timeframe: baseline and week 8

Interventionsignificant voxels (Number)
Depressed0

[back to top]

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Percent Change From Day 0 to D56

Utilized the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM), 21-item version to assess depressive symptoms, with a range of 0-63. Higher scores indicate more depression. For the change score, it is Baseline less Day 56 HAM total / Baseline. Thus, larger values mean a greater decrease in the level of depression (NCT00896441)
Timeframe: % change from baseline to Day 56 ( week 8)

Interventionpercentage of change in depression (Mean)
Depressed.4125

[back to top]

Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI)

CMAI examines several agitated behaviors including verbal, physical agitation, and other behaviors. Sub-items are summed. Range is 14-70. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. (NCT00898807)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Citalopram and Psychosocial Intervention27.7
Placebo and Psychosocial Intervention28.7

[back to top]

Modified Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Clinical Global Impression of Change in Agitation(CGIC)

"Modified Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Clinical Global Impression of Change in agitation(CGIC) accesses clinically significant change in agitation. A trained clinician, blind to treatment assignment, uses a 7-point Likert scale to rate change of each patient along a continuum from marked improvement(1), no change(4), and marked worsening(7). A number of aspects of the agitation is considered such as emotional agitation, mood liability/distress, psychomotor agitation, verbal aggression, and physical aggression. Range is 1-7." (NCT00898807)
Timeframe: Baseline to 9 weeks

Interventionpercentage moderate/marked improvement (Number)
Citalopram and Psychosocial Intervention40
Placebo and Psychosocial Intervention26

[back to top]

NeuroBehavior Rating Scale-- Agitation

NeuroBehavioral Rating Scale- Agitation(NBRS-A) assesses multiple types of psychopathology common in dementia and is based on a seven point Likert scale of increasing severity for each item(i.e., 0=not present, 1=very mild, 2-mild, 3=moderate, 4=moderately severe, 5=severe, 6=extremely severe). The NBRS agitation subscore includes NBRS 'inhibition', 'agitation', and 'hostility'. The range is 0 to 18 points. Higher scores indicate more symptoms. (NCT00898807)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Citalopram and Psychosocial Intervention4.33
Placebo and Psychosocial Intervention5.26

[back to top]

Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)-- Agitation Subscore

NPI agitation score is based on responses from an informed caregiver involved in the patient's life. Symptom severity (1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) is multiplied by frequency (1=occasionally, less than once/week; 4 = very frequently, once or more/day or continuously) to obtain the NPI agitation score.Range is 0-12. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. (NCT00898807)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Citalopram and Psychosocial Intervention7.8
Placebo and Psychosocial Intervention8.0

[back to top]

Weeks to Depression Remission

"Kaplan-Meier survival analyses to determine time to depression remission (defined as average HRSD-17 score < or = 7 for three consecutive weeks).~Analyses run with the full intent to treat sample (censoring patients who dropped out at time of termination)" (NCT00930293)
Timeframe: Measured at baseline and weekly for up to 20 weeks of treatment

Interventionweeks (Mean)
Personalized Depression Care13.99
Standard Depression Care11.59

[back to top]

Number of Participants Meeting Depression Remission Criteria

Depression remission defined as 3 consecutive weeks of HRSD-17 scores that on average, < or = 7 (NCT00930293)
Timeframe: Measured at baseline and weekly for up to 20 weeks of acute treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Personalized Depression Care10
Standard Depression Care15

[back to top]

CPFQ (Cognitive and Psychological Functioning Questionnaire)

Score on the Cognitive and Psychological Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ). Scores range from 7-42 with 42 referring to the worst functioning. CPFQ measured at baseline and 8 weeks. (NCT00955474)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineLast visit
Quetiapine30.823.56
Quetiapine With SSRI29.321.00

[back to top]

RBANS (Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status) Visuospatial/Constructional Sub-scale.

RBANS Visuospatial/Constructional sub-scales at Baseline and Week 8. Scores range from 40-160, with 160 referring to higher cognitive functioning. All RBANS subscales and the total score are standardized using age-based norms. Thus, they have a mean of 100 (average) and a standard deviation of 15. A score of 90-110 is in the average range; score of 70-85 mild to moderate cognitive impairment; score <70 moderate to severe impairment. (NCT00955474)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8
Quetiapine70.670.5
Quetiapine With SSRI75.678.3

[back to top]

Blood Level of Triglycerides at Baseline and Week 8.

Level of triglycerides at Baseline and Week 8. Normal range: 40-150mg/dl. (NCT00955474)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8
Quetiapine144.9170.6
Quetiapine With SSRI154.25190.5

[back to top]

Blood Level of Total Cholesterol Levels Were Collected at Baseline and Week 8.

Cholesterol levels were collected at Baseline and Week 8. Normal cholesterol levels should be <200mg/dl. (NCT00955474)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8
Quetiapine184.2188
Quetiapine With SSRI171.8201.7

[back to top]

Blood Hemoglobin A1C at Baseline and Week 8.

Blood hemoglobin A1C at Baseline and Week 8. Normal range: 3.8%-6.4%. (NCT00955474)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
Intervention% glycated hemoglobin (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8
Quetiapine5.65.4
Quetiapine With SSRI5.75.8

[back to top]

RBANS (Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status) Attention Sub-scale Scores at Baseline and Week 8.

RBANS Attention sub-scale scores at Baseline and Week 8. Scores range from 40-160, with 160 referring to higher cognitive functioning. All RBANS subscales and the total score are standardized using age-based norms. Thus, they have a mean of 100 (average) and a standard deviation of 15. A score of 90-110 is in the average range; score of 70-85 mild to moderate cognitive impairment; score <70 moderate to severe impairment. (NCT00955474)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8
Quetiapine95.8104.6
Quetiapine With SSRI85.486.1

[back to top]

Psychosis

Psychosis measured by Brief Psychosis Rating Scale (BPRS) at baseline and 8 weeks. Scores range from 24-168, with 168 bring the most severe. (NCT00955474)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineLast visit
Quetiapine56.0934.25
Quetiapine With SSRI60.4532.83

[back to top]

RBANS (Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status) Delayed Memory Subscale Scores at Baseline and Week 8.

RBANS Delayed Memory subscale scores at Baseline and Week 8. Scores range from 40-160, with 160 referring to higher cognitive functioning. All RBANS subscales and the total score are standardized using age-based norms. Thus, they have a mean of 100 (average) and a standard deviation of 15. A score of 90-110 is in the average range; score of 70-85 mild to moderate cognitive impairment; score <70 moderate to severe impairment. (NCT00955474)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8
Quetiapine82.472.9
Quetiapine With SSRI69.674.7

[back to top]

RBANS (Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status) Immediate Memory Sub-scale Score

RBANS Immediate Memory sub-scale scores at Baseline and Week 8. Scores range from 40-160, with 160 referring to higher cognitive functioning. All RBANS subscales and the total score are standardized using age-based norms. Thus, they have a mean of 100 (average) and a standard deviation of 15. A score of 90-110 is in the average range; score of 70-85 mild to moderate cognitive impairment; score <70 moderate to severe impairment. (NCT00955474)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8
Quetiapine83.382.8
Quetiapine With SSRI71.177.9

[back to top]

RBANS (Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status) Language Sub-scale Score.

RBANS Language sub-scale scores at Baseline and Week 8 of study. Scores range from 40-160, with 160 referring to higher cognitive functioning. All RBANS subscales and the total score are standardized using age-based norms. Thus, they have a mean of 100 (average) and a standard deviation of 15. A score of 90-110 is in the average range; score of 70-85 mild to moderate cognitive impairment; score <70 moderate to severe impairment. (NCT00955474)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8
Quetiapine80.487.9
Quetiapine With SSRI77.691.1

[back to top]

RBANS (Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status) Total Score

Neuropsychological Assessment. Scores range from 40-160, with 160 referring to higher cognitive functioning. All RBANS subscales and the total score are standardized using age-based norms. Thus, they have a mean of 100 (average) and a standard deviation of 15. A score of 90-110 is in the average range; score of 70-85 mild to moderate cognitive impairment; score <70 moderate to severe impairment. RBANS measured at baseline and 8 weeks. (NCT00955474)
Timeframe: 8

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineLast visit
Quetiapine77.3877.25
Quetiapine With SSRI70.0078.29

[back to top]

LDL Blood Levels at Baseline and Week 8.

LDL levels at Baseline and Week 8. Normal range < 100 mg/dl. (NCT00955474)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8
Quetiapine109121.1
Quetiapine With SSRI94.6123.3

[back to top]

HDL Blood Levels at Baseline and Week 8.

HDL levels at Baseline and Week 8. Normal range: 35-100 mg/dl. (NCT00955474)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8
Quetiapine47.740.8
Quetiapine With SSRI45.340.5

[back to top]

Fasting Blood Glucose

Fasting glucose levels collected at Baseline and Week 8. Normal range for fasting glucose is 70-110 mg/dl. (NCT00955474)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
Interventionml/dl (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8
Quetiapine91.689.1
Quetiapine and SSRI89.496.8

[back to top]

Depression

Depression measured with Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17 (HAM-D) at baseline and 8 weeks. Ham D 17 scores range from 0-52, 52 being the most severe. (NCT00955474)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineLast visit
Quetiapine279.57
Quetiapine With SSRI26.7310.14

[back to top]

Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS)

Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) is a clinician administered measure of anxiety in children and adolescents. The PARS is comprised of a 50-item symptom checklist used to determine the presence or absence of specific anxiety symptoms during the prior week and 7 severity/impairment items, each scored from 0 to 5 . The the score on the 7 items allows the clinician to rate symptom severity and associated impairment on a range from 0 to 35, with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity and associated impairment. The PARS is characterized by high interrater reliability (ICC = 0.97), adequate internal consistency (α = 0.64), and fair test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.55). There is preliminary support for convergent and divergent validity, and the PARS has demonstrated sensitivity to treatment effects in previously conducted clinical trials. (NCT00962039)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PARS Week 0PARS Week 2PARS Week 4PARS Week 8
Citalopram7.384.002.572.69
Placebo9.736.785.765.55

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S)

Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale is a clinician-completed measure that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, a patient is assessed on severity of illness at the time of rating, with values ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill), 2 (borderline ill), 3 (mildly ill), 4 (moderately ill), 5 (markedly ill), 6 (severely ill), to 7 (extremely ill). (NCT00962039)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
CGI-S Week 0CGI-S Week 2CGI-S Week 4CGI-S Week 8
Citalopram4.313.833.562.76
Placebo4.394.033.863.51

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) Will be Used to Assess Overall Global Illness Improvement. CGI-I Scores of 1 (Very Much Improved) or 2 (Much Improved) Indicate an Acceptable Treatment Response.

Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) is a 7-point scale, with lower values being more favorable, used to assess overall global illness improvement. The CGI is a clinician-completed measure, with values ranging from 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse), to 7 (very much worse). CGI-I scores of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) were considered to indicate an acceptable treatment response. A global measure of functional status was chosen as a primary outcome due to the broad array of symptomatology seen in pediatric RAP and the ambiguous relationship between functional status and symptoms of pain, anxiety, and depression in pediatric RAP. The CGI-I is a dichotomous primary outcome measure of global clinical improvement with clinical response be defined as a CGI-I score of 1 or 2 for at least two consecutive weeks. (NCT00962039)
Timeframe: The CGI will be completed at weeks 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
CGI-I Week 2CGI-I Week 4CGI-I Week 8
Citalopram3.483.032.65
Placebo3.683.383.24

[back to top]

Children's Global Assessment Scale (C-GAS)

Children's Global Assessment Scale (C-GAS) is an interview-based adaptation of the Global Assessment Scale developed to assess child and adolescent functioning during a specified time period. Scores range from one to 100, with scores of 70 or below reflecting abnormally low functioning and higher scores reflecting better functioning. The C-GAS has demonstrated reliability, as well as discriminant and concurrent validity. A CGAS score of < 70 will be a requirement at study entry. (NCT00962039)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
CGAS Week 0CGAS Week 2CGAS Week 4CGAS Week 8
Citalopram54.4259.2463.2766.72
Placebo54.0758.0559.1461.22

[back to top]

Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)

Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) is a clinician administered measure of depression in children and adolescents and provides data necessary to diagnose depressive disorder and rate the severity of depressive symptoms over time. The CDRS-R is composed of 17 items, most rated on a 1 to 7 scale, with a minimum score of 17 and a maximum of 113. Higher scores reflect greater depression severity, with scores of 40 and above generally considered to be reflective of a depressive diagnosis. (NCT00962039)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
CDRS-R Week 0CDRS-R Week 2CDRS-R Week 4CDRS-R Week 8
Citalopram34.5027.8124.9723.88
Placebo39.2331.8928.3528.39

[back to top]

Abdominal Pain Index (API)

The API is a well-validated and reliable measure of abdominal pain assessing the frequency, duration, and intensity of abdominal pain consisting of five items assessing the frequency, duration, and intensity of abdominal pain experienced during the prior 2 weeks. Two of the items are scored from 0 to 5, one is scaled 0 to 8, and two are scaled 0 to 10, with lower scores considered to be better than higher scores. Item scores are standardized using Z-scores and then summed to yield an index of abdominal pain that has been sensitive to change in previous epidemiological and treatment studies of FAP. Alpha reliability ranged from 0.80 to 0.93. The API will be a continuous primary outcome measure of abdominal pain. (NCT00962039)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
API-C Week 0API-C Week 2API-C Week 4API-C Week 8
Citalopram0.45-0.14-0.21-0.36
Placebo0.470.060.08-0.03

[back to top]

Depressive Symptom Reduction

Symptoms of depression were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). This 21-question, multiple choice self-report instrument includes items pertaining to symptoms of depression, including hopelessness and irritability, physical symptoms such as fatigue, and thoughts such as guilt. Each item has at a set of four possible responses, ranging in intensity for least intense to most intense. The total score is calculated by adding the responses to each item. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. The total score on the scale ranges from 0 to 63. Total scores on the scale of less 10 indicate minimal depression; total scores between 10 and 15 indicate mild depression; and total scores greater than 16 indicate a probable clinical diagnosis of depression. (NCT01032018)
Timeframe: Change from depression at baseline to depression at 6-months

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Referred Care-6.6
Stepped Care-10.1

[back to top]

Cost for Healthcare Utilization (Psychiatric Medications, Hospitalizations, Cardiac Procedures, Outpatient Services)

(NCT01032018)
Timeframe: 6 months after randomization

Interventiondollars (Mean)
Referred Care4289.23
Stepped Care4358.02

[back to top]

Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS)

"The Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) is a rater-administered assessment that measures depression in schizophrenia. The scale consists of 9 questions each rated 0 to 3. 0 corresponds with absent and 3 corresponds with severe. The total score for all items is provided for each time point. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 27. A higher score indicates increased depressive symptoms." (NCT01041274)
Timeframe: Screening, Baseline, Weeks 1-8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
ScreeningBaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week 44Week 48Week 52
Citalopram1.931.832.132.002.41.341.541.291.201.081.41.971.111.32.67.71.42.96.63.5.4
Placebo2.262.581.941.841.871.791.671.072.151.491.32.721.231.201.14.811.061.211.551.31.15

[back to top]

Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)

"The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) is a 24-item rater-administered scale assessing overall psychiatric and psychotic symptoms. Items 1-14 are assessed through self-report and items 15-24 are assessed on the basis of observed behavior. Each item is rated from 1 to 7 where 1 is not present and 7 is extremely severe. A score of 0 indicates not assessed. The total score is a sum of all items and is reported for each time point. The minimum score is 24 and the maximum score is 168, and higher values indicate increased symptom severity." (NCT01041274)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week 44Week 48Week 52
Citalopram3933.1133.333.827.933.132.629.629.428.631.130.130.029.1
Placebo38.033.133.233.229.131.232.731.629.932.231.433.532.632.7

[back to top]

Heinrich Quality of Life Scale (QOL)

The Quality of Life Scale (QOL) is a 21-item scale based on a semi-structured interview to assess functional deficits in schizophrenia. Each item is rated on a 7-point scale where 0 indicates a normal level of functioning, or no deficit, and 6 corresponds to more severe deficit. The total score is a sum of all items. The minimum total score is 0 and the maximum total score is 126, higher scores indicate increased impairment in functioning. (NCT01041274)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 52

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24Week 32Week 40Week 52
Citalopram71.581.086.286.489.686.487.498.7100.286.2
Placebo75.983.687.190.492.191.892.998.091.195.6

[back to top]

InterSePT Scale for Suicidal Thinking (ISST)

IntraSePT Scale for Suicidal Thinking (ISST) consists of 12 questions rated from 0 to 2 with increasing intensity (i.e. none, weak, moderate to stron). It quantifies the current conscious and overtly expressed suicidal thinking in schizophrenic patients by canvassing various suicidal thoughts and wishes during a 20- to 30-min semi-structured interview. The total score is computed by adding the 12 individual item scores and ranges from 0 to 24. A score of zero indicates low suicidal ideation and a score of 24 indicates high suicidal ideation. (NCT01041274)
Timeframe: Screening, Baseline, Weeks 1-8

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
ScreeningBaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8
Citalopram0.1840.6050.6670.2930.1360.00.3570.1250.00.0
Placebo0.6430.4620.2630.01.000.00.00.00.00.20

[back to top]

Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS)

"The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) is a 25-item rater-administered scale to assess negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Each item is rated from 0 to 5 where 0 is none and 5 is severe. The SANS consists of five subscales: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition/apathy, ahnedonia/asociality, and attention. Each subscale contains a global rating item which assesses the overall severity of symptoms within the subscale. The total score consists of a sum of all items except the global ratings and items 10, 23, 24, and 25. The total score is reported for each time point. The minimum total score is 0 and the maximum total score is 85. A higher score indicates increased severity of negative symptoms." (NCT01041274)
Timeframe: Screening, Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28,32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
ScreeningBaselineWeek 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week 44Week 48Week 52
Citalopram19.8921.3716.9813.8312.3811.0812.2612.419.98.08.389.357.547.5413.83
Placebo16.7718.9114.5813.1114.0611.4812.2913.0612.5910.9211.6810.6412.6413.011.64

[back to top]

Responder Status Based on Complicated Grief Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale

Brief rating scale frequently used in clinical trials. For this study, version modified for complicated grief was be used. Response is defined as a score of 1(very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. The rating was done by an Independent Evaluator. (NCT01179568)
Timeframe: Weeks 12 and 20

Interventionpercentage of responders (Number)
Citalopram (CIT)46
Placebo (PLA; Sugar Pill)38
Complicated Grief Treatment With Citalopram (CGT With CIT)84
Complicated Grief Treatment With Placebo (CGT With PLA)83

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG)

The 19-item self-report instrument assesses symptoms of complicated grief. Responses on individual items are added up to a total score, which can range from 0 to 76 with higher scores indicating more intense symptoms. This scale has been utilized previously in treatment studies of CG. Additional times points include weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 40. For the pre-specified analyses we compared change in the ICG total score from baseline (calculated as baseline score minus week 12 score) for CIT vs PLA at week 12 (aim 1), based on the intention-to-treat principle including all randomized participants. (NCT01179568)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

Interventionscore change from baseline to wk12 (Mean)
Citalopram (CIT)18
Placebo (PLA; Sugar Pill)16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG)

The 19-item self-report instrument assesses symptoms of complicated grief. Responses on individual items are added up to a total score, which can range from 0 to 76 with higher scores indicating more intense symptoms. This scale has been utilized previously in treatment studies of CG. Additional times points include weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 40. For the pre-specified analyses we compared change in the ICG total score from baseline (calculated as baseline score minus week 20 score) for CIT with CGT vs PLA with CGT (aim 2), and for CIT with CGT vs CIT (aim 3) based on the intention-to-treat principle including all randomized participants. (NCT01179568)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 20

Interventionscore change from baseline to wk20 (Mean)
Citalopram (CIT)20
Complicated Grief Treatment With Citalopram (CGT With CIT)25
Complicated Grief Treatment With Placebo (CGT With PLA)26

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)

The WSAS is a modification of a scale introduced by Hafner and Marks (1976), consisting of 0-8 point ratings of the extent to which symptoms interfere with five areas of daily functioning: work, home management, private leisure, social leisure, and family relationships. It is a well-validated, widely used self-report measure. Additional time points include weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 40. A total score calculated as a sum of all items (possible range 0-40) was used in the analyses with higher scores indicating more impairment. For the pre-specified analyses we compared change in the WSAS total score from baseline (calculated as baseline score minus week 20 score) for CIT with CGT vs PLA with CGT (aim 2), and for CIT with CGT vs CIT (aim 3) based on the intention-to-treat principle including all randomized participants. (NCT01179568)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 20

Interventionscore change from baseline to wk20 (Mean)
Citalopram (CIT)10
Complicated Grief Treatment With Citalopram (CGT With CIT)14
Complicated Grief Treatment With Placebo (CGT With PLA)16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)

The WSAS is a modification of a scale introduced by Hafner and Marks (1976), consisting of 0-8 point ratings of the extent to which symptoms interfere with five areas of daily functioning: work, home management, private leisure, social leisure, and family relationships. It is a well-validated, widely used self-report measure. Additional time points include weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 40. A total score calculated as a sum of all items (possible range 0-40) was used in the analyses with higher scores indicating more impairment. For the pre-specified analyses we compared change in the WSAS total score from baseline (calculated as baseline score minus week 12 score) for CIT vs PLA at week 12 (aim 1), based on the intention-to-treat principle including all randomized participants. (NCT01179568)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

Interventionscore change from baseline to wk12 (Mean)
Citalopram (CIT)10
Placebo (PLA; Sugar Pill)8

[back to top]

Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS)

"The S-STS is an 14 item clinician administered prospective rating scale that scores both treatment-emergent suicidal ideations and suicidal behaviors with scores ranging from 0-40 points. Patients scoring a 0 are experiencing no suicidal thoughts, ideations, or attempts, while a score of 40 indicates a fatal, completed suicide.~Comparison was made between the citalopram with lithium and the citalopram with placebo treatment groups. Outcome measures are expressed as change scores from the baseline visit to week 4." (NCT01189812)
Timeframe: 4 weeks; from Baseline to Week 4

InterventionScores on a Scale (S-STSS) (Mean)
Placebo (Sugar Pill)4.8
Lithium5.0

[back to top]

Change in Dim Light Melatonin Onset

"The Dim Light Melatonin Onset (DLMO) is the time of the onset of melatonin secretion under dim light conditions using the equivalent thresholds of 10 pg/ml in plasma and 3 pg/ml in saliva. It is a marker of biological time. Data are provided in decimal and military time (e.g., 9:30 pm equals 21.50).~This measure is used to determine if there was a change in the time of the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) before treatment with escitalopram (at Study Visit 3) and after treatment with escitalopram (at Study Visit 11)." (NCT01214044)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks: Study Visit 3 (after 1 week of placebo) to study Visit 11 (after 8 weeks of escitalopram)

Interventiondecimal military time (hours) (Mean)
Baseline DLMOPost-escitalopram DLMO
Study Drug21.1720.77

[back to top]

Change in Phase Angle Difference (PAD)

The PAD is the time interval (number of hours) between the Dim Light Melatonin Onset (DLMO) and the average midpoint of sleep during the prior week. Larger PADs indicate a longer time interval between the DLMO and midpoint of sleep. A negative change in PAD value indicates a shortening of the time interval from Study Visit 3 to Study Visit 11. (NCT01214044)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks: Study Visit 3 (after 1 week of placebo) to study Visit 11 (after 8 weeks of escitalopram)

Interventionhours (Mean)
Study Drug-0.6

[back to top]

Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Scores

The HAM-D is the total score on the 21-question Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Scores range from 0 to 53 with higher scores indicating worse symptoms of depression. (NCT01214044)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks: Study Visit 3 (after 1 week of placebo) to study Visit 11 (after 8 weeks of escitalopram)

Interventionunits on scale (scores) (Mean)
Study Drug-2.3

[back to top]

Change in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) Scores

The BDI-II is the total score on the 21-question Beck Depression Inventory II questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 63 with higher scores indicating worse symptoms of depression. (NCT01214044)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks: Study Visit 3 (after 1 week of placebo) to study Visit 11 (after 8 weeks of escitalopram)

Interventionunits on scale (scores) (Mean)
Study Drug-3.3

[back to top]

Change in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) for Fatigue Score

The CGI-S is a clinician-rated scale that rates the severity of the patient's current state of fatigue based on the Investigator's clinical opinion with regard to the patient population with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Patient were rated on a scale from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating a normal state and 7 indicating that the patient was among the most extremely fatigued (NCT01254305)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-1.5
Levomilnacipran ER-1.8
SSRI-1.9

[back to top]

Change in Patient Global Impressions of Severity (PGI-S) for Fatigue Score

The PGI-S is a clinician-rated scale that rates was used to rate the severity of the patient's current state of overall fatigue. Patients were rated on a scale from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating no symptoms of fatigue and 7 indicating extreme fatigue. (NCT01254305)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-1.4
Levomilnacipran ER-1.7
SSRI-1.7

[back to top]

Change in Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ), Last Observation Carried Forward

The Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire is a patient-rated, 7-item scale used to measure cognitive and executive dysfunction in mood and anxiety disorders. The CPFQ is sensitive to change with treatment and displays convergent validity by significant correlations with other measures of sleepiness, fatigue, apathy, and neuropsychological functioning. Patients are rated on a scale from 1 to 6 for seven common complaints of depressed patients reporting fatigue or cognitive/executive problems-with 1 indicating greater than normal functioning, 2 indicating normal functioning, and 3 to 6 indicating degrees of impaired functioning. The CPFQ ranges from the best possible score of 7 (greater than normal functioning) to the worst possible score of 42 (totally absent). (NCT01254305)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-5.9
Levomilnacipran ER-7.0
SSRI-6.4

[back to top]

Early and Sustained (Antidepressant) Response (ESR) Rate

Early and Sustained Response (ESR) is defined as a MADRS total score reduction from Baseline of 50% or more and a MADRS total score ≤16 at Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, and Week 6. (NCT01312922)
Timeframe: From (end of) Week 2 visit to (end of) Week 6 visit

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PNB0117
Citalopram17
Pipamperone17

[back to top]

Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)

The ACQ has 7 questions (the top scoring 5 symptoms, FEV1% pred. and daily rescue bronchodilator use). Patients are asked to recall how their asthma has been during the previous week and to respond to the symptom and bronchodilator use questions on a 7-point scale (0=no impairment, 6= maximum impairment). Clinic staff score the FEV1% predicted on a 7-point scale. The questions are equally weighted and the ACQ score is the mean of the 7 questions and therefore between 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled). (NCT01324700)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
High Severity: Escitalopram1.15
High Severity: Placebo1.63
Low Severity: Escitalopram1.39
Low Severity: Placebo1.23

[back to top]

Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD)

The patient is rated by a clinician on 17 items that measure depressive symptom severity. The total score is calculated by summing the responses across all items. Lower scores (closer to 0) indicate the absence of depressive symptoms, while higher scores indicate the presence of depressive symptoms. Eight items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 = not present to 4 = severe. Nine are scored from 0-2 (0 = not present; 2 = severe). The scale range of scores is 0-52. (NCT01324700)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
High Severity: Escitalopram10.08
High Severity: Placebo14.38
Low Severity: Escitalopram10.39
Low Severity: Placebo9.31

[back to top]

Nocturnal Ingestions

Number of nocturnal ingestions (waking and having something to eat) were reported at each visit. (NCT01401595)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
baseline nocturnal ingestions/weektreatment end nocturnal ingestions/week
Controls0.0NA
Night Eating Syndrome Open Label Escitalopram Treatment5.81.2

[back to top]

Night Eating Symptoms

"The responses on the Night Eating Symptom Scale (NESS) will be examined over time.~Subjects will complete the NESS at their baseline visit, and at every treatment visit thereafter. The Night Eating Symptom Scale-II (NESS-II) (Lundgren, Allison, Vinai, & Gluck, 2012) is a 14-item questionnaire (possible range of 0-56, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms) that assesses the presence of NES features over the course of the previous week. The NESS will indicate whether or not escitalopram is having an effect on our participants' night eating symptoms." (NCT01401595)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline Night Eating Symptom Scaletreatment end night eating symptom scale
ControlsNANA
Night Eating Syndrome Open Label Escitalopram Treatment30.215.2

[back to top]

Change in Symptoms of NES

Outcome of treatment will be measured by self report questionnaire, the Night Eating Symptom Scale ( higher score indicates worse symptoms). The percentage of calories consumed after dinner was estimated by recall at each treatment visit, as compared to their baseline % of intake after dinner, which was calculated through food diaries. The number of nocturnal ingestions (waking during the night and eating) per week was also recalled at each treatment visit. (NCT01401595)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of calories after dinner (Mean)
baseline %calories consumed after dinnertreatment end %calories after dinner
Controls11.8NA
Night Eating Syndrome Open Label Escitalopram Treatment46.117.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death

"In this analysis patients with all (serious and non-serious) adverse events, and death were reported.~See Safety Section." (NCT01436643)
Timeframe: 21 weeks

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any Adverse EventDeathSerious Adverse Event
Citalopram and Fingolimod1201
Fingolimod1501
Fluoxetine and Fingolimod1100
Venlafaxine and Fingolimod1201

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 10 in the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score

"The Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale is a clinician-rated scale used to rate the severity of the participant's current state of mental illness compared with a patient population with major depressive disorder. In particular, the clinician is asked to respond to the following question: Considering your total clinical experience with this population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time? The patient is rated on the following 7-point scale: 1-normal, not at all ill, 2-borderline ill, 3-mildly ill, 4-moderately ill, 5-markedly ill, 6-severely ill, 7-among the most extremely ill patients. A higher score indicates more mental illness. A negative change score indicates improvement." (NCT01473381)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 10

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.53
Vilazodone 20 mg/Day-1.88
Vilazodone 40 mg/Day-1.86
Citalopram 40 mg/Day-1.88

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 10

The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale based on participant interviews. The scale assesses depressive symptomatology that occurred in participants during the week preceding each interview. Participants were rated on 10 items: Apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. Each item was scored on a 7-point scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The total score was the sum of the scores of the 10 items and ranged from 0 to 60. A higher score indicates more depressive symptomatology. A negative change score indicates improvement. (NCT01473381)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 10

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-14.76
Vilazodone 20 mg/Day-17.33
Vilazodone 40 mg/Day-17.58
Citalopram 40 mg/Day-17.50

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Sustained Response

The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale based on participant interviews. The scale assesses depressive symptomatology that occurred in participants during the week preceding each interview. Participants were rated on 10 items: Apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. Each item was scored on a 7-point scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The total score was the sum of the scores of the 10 items and ranged from 0 to 60. A higher score indicates more depressive symptomatology. A MADRS sustained response was defined as a MADRS total score ≤ 12 for at least the last 2 visits during the double-blind treatment period (Weeks 1-10). A total MADRS score ≤ 12 corresponds to an average score of 1 per item and is indicative of very low level of depressive symptoms. (NCT01473381)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 10

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo26.3
Vilazodone 20 mg/Day29.9
Vilazodone 40 mg/Day33.5
Citalopram 40 mg/Day31.1

[back to top]

Proportion of Cocaine-positive Urines Per Week

Mean proportion of cocaine-positive urines per week, averaged across 9 weeks, is reported. Urine was collected three times each week over 9 weeks. Missing data is imputed as cocaine use. (NCT01535573)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionproportion of cocaine urines per week (Mean)
Citalopram Low Dose0.85
Citalopram High Dose0.8
Placebo0.85

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Cocaine-negative Urines Collected During Treatment Period

Urine samples were tested for benzoylecgonine, which is a metabolite of cocaine that is excreted in the urine. The presence of benzoylecgonine in the urine indicates cocaine use. (NCT01535573)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Citalopram Low Dose14
Citalopram High Dose26
Placebo27

[back to top]

Retention as Assessed by Number of Participants Remaining in Treatment

(NCT01535573)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Citalopram Low Dose13
Citalopram High Dose23
Placebo24

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Are Cocaine Abstinent During the Last 2 Weeks of Treatment (Weeks 8-9), as Assessed by Urine Test

Urine samples were tested for benzoylecgonine, which is a metabolite of cocaine that is excreted in the urine. The presence of benzoylecgonine in the urine indicates cocaine use. (NCT01535573)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Citalopram Low Dose0
Citalopram High Dose4
Placebo2

[back to top]

Mean Difference From Baseline to Day 3 in Glutamine/Glutamate (Gln/Glu) Ratio Within Depressed Group

Estimated mean difference (day 3 minus baseline) in the glutamine/glutamate (Gln/Glu) ratio in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex as measured by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy from baseline to day 3 of citalopram treatment within the depressed group. The change in metabolites from baseline to each time point was assessed by random regression analysis, adjusting for age and sex, using generalized estimating equations to account for the correlation of observations within individuals. (NCT01557946)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline to Day 3

Interventionarbitrary units (Mean)
Participants With Depression0.015

[back to top]

Mean Difference From Baseline to Day 7 in Glutamine/Glutamate (Gln/Glu) Ratio Within Depressed Group

Estimated mean difference (day 7 minus baseline) in the glutamine/glutamate (Gln/Glu) ratio in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex as measured by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy from baseline to day 7 of citalopram treatment within the depressed group. The change in metabolites from baseline to each time point was assessed by random regression analysis, adjusting for age and sex, using generalized estimating equations to account for the correlation of observations within individuals. (NCT01557946)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to day 7

Interventionarbitrary units (Mean)
Participants With Depression-0.0025

[back to top]

Craving for Alcohol in Alcohol Dependence With Citalopram Compared to Placebo

"To assess whether craving for alcohol in alcohol dependence is affected by iv citalopram, compared to placebo.~Cue-induced craving for alcohol was assessed using the Alcohol Urge Questionnaire, composed of 8 questions with responses on a 0 (none) to 7 (severe or highest level) which when scored provide an estimate of the level of craving for alcohol for the participant. A maximum score is thus 56, indicating the highest level of craving for alcohol, whereas the minimum score of 0 indicates no appreciable craving for alcohol." (NCT01657760)
Timeframe: 5 minutes after 1 hour of infusion intervention

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Alcohol Dependent Citalopram Infusion21
Alcohol Dependent Placebo30.4
Healthy Control Citalopram Infusion10.8
Healthy Control Placebo Infusion10.6

[back to top]

Striatal Dopamine Receptor Availability in Alcohol Dependence With Citalopram, Compared to Placebo

relative binding potential of dopamine D2/3 receptor specific tracer compared to cerebellum, where there is known to be almost no dopamine receptors. (NCT01657760)
Timeframe: 2-3 hours after 1 hour citalopram or placebo infusion

Interventionstriatal binding potential ratio (Mean)
Alcohol Dependent Citalopram Infusion22.4
Healthy Control Citalopram Infusion25.7
Alcohol Dependent Placebo Infusion22.5
Healthy Control Placebo Infusion21.3

[back to top]

Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)

The modified ADAS-Cog is a cognitive battery that assesses learning, memory, language production, language comprehension, constructional praxis, ideational praxis, and orientation. Subjects' scores represent the total number of errors made throughout the various tasks. The total number of possible errors is between 0-85. (NCT01658228)
Timeframe: Week 16

Interventionnumber of errors on a scale from 0-85 (Mean)
Donepezil Treatment Group13.2
Placebo Treatment Group13.9

[back to top]

Selective Reminding Test (SRT) Delayed Recall

The 12-item, 6-trial SRT is a memory measure used to assess verbal list learning and memory. The total number of words learned over six trials (total immediate recall) and delayed recall (after a 15-minute delay) was obtained. (NCT01658228)
Timeframe: Week 16

InterventionWords (Mean)
Donepezil Treatment Group7.4
Placebo Treatment Group7.4

[back to top]

Selective Reminding Test (SRT) Total Recall

The 12-item, 6-trial SRT is a memory measure used to assess verbal list learning and memory. The total number of words learned over six trials (total immediate recall) was obtained. (NCT01658228)
Timeframe: Week 16

InterventionWords (Mean)
Donepezil Treatment Group45.6
Placebo Treatment Group46.6

[back to top]

Comparison of FARS and ICARS

Differences between FARS - ICARS at each treatment interval (NCT01716221)
Timeframe: Assessements are performed in 5 different states in a single patient: baseline (Bupropion 100mg and Citalopram 20mg - unblinded), then blinded at 5 weeks (citalopram), 10 weeks (placebo), 15 (bupropion), and 20 weeks (citalopram + bupropion)

Interventionpoints (Number)
Baseline - Unblinded on Buproprion and Citalopram1
Citalopram (Week 5)-6
OFF - Bupropion Placebo + Citalopram Placebo (Week 10)1
Bupropion Only (Week 15)12
Bupropion + Citalopram (Week 20)6

[back to top]

Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS)

A rating scale developed for Friedreich ataxia in evaluation of ataxia. Score range from 0-159 with a score of 0 meaning normal and greater scores indicating worsened disease. (NCT01716221)
Timeframe: Assessements are performed in 5 different states in a single patient: baseline (Bupropion 100mg and Citalopram 20mg - unblinded), then blinded at 5 weeks (citalopram), 10 weeks (placebo), 15 (bupropion), and 20 weeks (citalopram + bupropion)

Interventionpoints (Number)
Baseline - Unblinded on Buproprion and Citalopram43
Citalopram (Week 5)41
OFF - Bupropion Placebo + Citalopram Placebo (Week 10)47
Bupropion Only (Week 15)42
Bupropion + Citalopram (Week 20)45

[back to top]

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale

The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale is a 21 item questionnaire scored each item on a scale of 0 to 3 or 5. The max score is 66. Higher scores indicate worsened depression. All items are summed together to give a total score. A total score of 0-7 is considered normal, while total scores greater than 20 are indicative of moderate or greater depression. (NCT01716221)
Timeframe: Assessements are performed in 5 different states in a single patient: baseline (Bupropion 100mg and Citalopram 20mg - unblinded), then blinded at 5 weeks (citalopram), 10 weeks (placebo), 15 (bupropion), and 20 weeks (citalopram + bupropion)

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
Baseline - Unblinded on Buproprion and Citalopram7
Citalopram (Week 5)10
OFF - Bupropion Placebo + Citalopram Placebo (Week 10)2
Bupropion Only (Week 15)3
Bupropion + Citalopram (Week 20)4

[back to top]

International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS)

The ICARS is a 19 item rating scale of ataxia with the total score ranging from 0 to 100. A score of 0 means normal and higher scores represent worsened disease. (NCT01716221)
Timeframe: Assessements are performed in 5 different states in a single patient: baseline (Bupropion 100mg and Citalopram 20mg - unblinded), then blinded at 5 weeks (citalopram), 10 weeks (placebo), 15 weeks (bupropion), and 20 weeks (citalopram + bupropion)

Interventionunits (Number)
Bupropion & Citalopram39
Bupropion & Placebo30
Placebo & Citalopram47
Placebo & Placebo46
Baseline42

[back to top]

Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

"The entire study will last 18 weeks. For the first 6 weeks, subjects will come in once every 2 weeks. For the next 4 weeks, subjects will come in once per week. For the next 6 weeks, subjects will come in once every 2 weeks. The final visit will come 2 weeks later for a total of 11 visits where the MADRS will be administered. Only the baseline and final (last observation) assessments for the outcome measure was used in determining results, thus these are the only values included.~MADRS scores range from 0-60, with higher scores indicating a greater level of severity. No subscales were used." (NCT01742832)
Timeframe: Baseline and final MADRS scores during the double-blind phase.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
First Randomized Visit (Visit 8)Second Randomized Visit (Visit 9)Third Randomized Visit (Visit 10)Fourth Randomized Visit (Visit 11)
Citalopram12.713.213.512.7
Vilazodone13.914.513.913.9

[back to top]

Change in Selective Reminding Test - Total Immediate Recall (SRT-IR)

Change in Selective Reminding Test-Total Immediate Recall (SRT-IR) scores from baseline to Week 48: Measures word recall (maximum 12 words per trial, across 6 trials). Maximum total recall score across 6 trials is 72; minimum recall is 0 across 6 trials. The higher the raw score, the better the patient did at recalling the target words. The unit of measure is the raw score, or the sum of the number of words recalled across all 6 trials. (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: baseline, 48 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment7.5

[back to top]

Change in Trails A

Change in Trails A scores from baseline to Week 48: Measures attention and executive function. It asks patients to connect numbers from 1-25 in numerical order as fast as they can. Patients are timed; the longer it takes for the patient to connect the numbers, the worse their score. Unit of measure is in seconds. The amount of errors that the patient makes during trails is also recorded. (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment1.9

[back to top]

Change in Trails B

Change from baseline to Week 48 on Trails B: Measures attention and executive function. It asks patients to connect numbers and letters in numerical to alphabetical order from (1-13 and A-L) as fast as they can. Patients are timed; the longer it takes for the patient to connect the numbers and letters, the worse their score. Unit of measure is in seconds. The amount of errors that the patient makes during trails is also recorded. (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment-36.3

[back to top]

Change in Wechsler Memory Scale-III (WMS-III)

Change in Wechsler Memory Scale-III scores from baseline to Week 48: The WMS-III Visual Reproduction sub-test was used to measure visual working memory and delayed memory. Patients were shown pictures of four drawings and were asked to reproduce them from memory immediately after seeing them, and 25 minutes after seeing them. The four scores are summed and the greater the total raw score, the better the patient did on the assessment. The maximum raw score for this test is a 41 on both the immediate and delayed portions (the overall range is 0-82 points). The change score is calculated using the total scores of both the immediate and delayed portions. (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment9.9

[back to top]

Conversion to Dementia Using Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR)

The CDR is a numeric rating scale that is used to quantify the severity of one's cognitive function. The scale goes from 0=normal; 0.5=mild cognitive impairment; 1 to 3=mild to moderate/severe dementia. CDR was used a dichotomous outcome measure (no=0; yes=1). (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment1

[back to top]

Change in Clinical Global Impression - Cognitive Change

The CGI Cognitive Change follows a seven-point likert scale. Compared to the patient's condition at baseline in the study [prior to medication initiation], the patient's condition is rated as: 1=very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse since the initiation of treatment. Responses from the entire group were calculated. Mean at final visit and baseline is reported below. (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
CGI-Cognitive Change (Baseline)Clinical Global Impression-Cogntive Change (WK 48)
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment3.62.7

[back to top]

Change in Clinical Global Impression - Depression Change

The CGI Depression Change follows a seven-point likert scale. Compared to the patient's condition at baseline in the study [prior to medication initiation], the patient's condition is rated as: 1=very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse since the initiation of treatment. Responses were calculated for the entire group. Mean at final visit has been reported below. Higher mean at baseline indicates a decrease in depression scores. (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cognitive Global Impression at BaselineCognitive Global Impression at Final Visit (WK 48)
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment4.12.1

[back to top]

Change in Treatment Emergent Side Effects (TESS)

"Somatic side effect rating scale which includes 26 common somatic side effects associated with previous medication clinical trials; rated by the study physician. Factors were dichotomized to yes or no responses on this scale, which equated to the symptom being either present or not present. Yes and no responses were given a value of 0 (no) or 1 (yes). Responses from the entire group were calculated and the mean at baseline and the last visit is reported below." (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Emergent Side Effects (Baseline)Treatment Emergent Side Effects (WK 48)
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment6.63.2

[back to top]

Change in 24-item HAMD

Change in 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) scores from baseline to Week 48: HAMD measures depression severity based on a series of 24 items items. The range of HAMD total score is 0-74; 0 indicates no depressive symptoms and a maximum HAMD score is a 74, where the greater the score indicates more significant psychopathology. In this study, moderate to severe depression is considered a HAMD-24 greater than 14. (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment-15.2

[back to top]

Change in Selective Reminding Test - Delayed Recall (SRT-DR)

Change in Selective Reminding Test-Delayed Recall scores from baseline to Week 48: SRT Delay is administered 15 minutes after the immediate recall portion. Patients are asked to remember as many of the words as they can from the 6 trials. Maximum raw score is a 12 for free recall. If a patient is unable to recall a word, they are given a chance to recognize it among three incorrect word choices. Maximum raw score for recognition is 12. The greater the score on the delayed recall portion, the better the patient does on the assessment. (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment1.2

[back to top]

Money Earned

"Change in amount of money earned between baseline and after 6 weeks of antidepressant treatment is determined through a summary score from a variety of decision-making tasks. Participants received between $5 and $40 per visit, depending on the outcomes of the decisions made on the computerized tasks. Variable payment ensured that the decision-making tasks were approached realistically, as opposed to using hypothetical points that do not have meaning in the real world. Greater earnings indicate better financial decision-making.~The specific tasks were:~risk task~balloon analogue risk task~temporal discounting task~ultimatum game~continuous performance task" (NCT01916824)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

,
InterventionUS Dollars (Mean)
Baseline VisitAfter 6 Weeks of Treatment
Healthy Controls25.021.9
Participants With Major Depressive Disorder23.220.5

[back to top]

Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression

The patient is rated by a clinician among 24 dimensions with a score on a 3 or 5 point scale. A score of 0-9 is considered to be normal. Score between 10-18 is considered as mild depression, Scores between 19-26 indicate moderate, scores between 27-34 indicate severe, and score between 35-75 indicate very severe depression. (NCT01919216)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Open Track10.79
Placebo Track - Citalopram15.30
Placebo Track - Placebo12.75

[back to top]

Cocaine Use/Treatment Effectiveness Score (TES)

Number of benzoylecgonine negative urines divided by the total number of urines collected (NCT02080832)
Timeframe: 8 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercentage of negative urines (Number)
Medication (Citalopram 20mg)6.6
Placebo8.3
Medication (Citalopram 40mg)29

[back to top]

fMRI Brain Activation in Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus

Brain activation on fMRI while participants undergo a Go/Nogo task. Percent of significant cluster in Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) for contrast of Hard Nogo minus Easy Nogo correlation with treatment effectiveness score. (NCT02080832)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionPercent of significant voxels in cluster (Number)
Citalopram (20mg or 40mg)83
Placebo0

[back to top]

fMRI Brain Activation in Right Orlandic Operculum

Brain activation on fMRI while participants undergo a Go/Nogo task. Percent of significant cluster in Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) for contrast of Hard Nogo minus Easy Nogo correlation with treatment effectiveness score. (NCT02080832)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionpercent of significant voxels in cluster (Number)
Citalopram (20mg or 40mg)8
Placebo0

[back to top]

fMRI Brain Activation in Right Precentral Gyrus

Brain activation on fMRI while participants undergo a Go/Nogo task. Percent of significant cluster in Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) for contrast of Hard Nogo minus Easy Nogo correlation with treatment effectiveness score. (NCT02080832)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionpercent of significant voxels in cluster (Number)
Citalopram (20mg or 40mg)9
Placebo0

[back to top]

Number of Response to Treatment Events

Response Defined as 50% Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 Score at 12 Weeks (NCT02137369)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionnumber of events (Number)
SSRI21
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy5

[back to top]

Number of Remission From Major Depressive Episode Events

Remission from major depressive episode as assessed by 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. (NCT02137369)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionnumber of events (Number)
SSRI15
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy4

[back to top]

Amyloid Beta Levels in CSF

Change in the level of Amyloid Beta peptides (Amyloid Beta 42 and Amyloid Beta 40) in the CSF between the measurement at baseline and the measurement after exposure with escitalopram. (NCT02161458)
Timeframe: 2 - 8 Weeks (we used week 8 minus baseline and week 2 minus baseline)

,,,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Ab 42 in CSFAb 40 in CSF
Escitalopram 20mg for 2 Weeks-12.746.27
Escitalopram 20mg for 8 Weeks-25.63-41.82
Escitalopram 30mg for 8 Weeks-22.73-152.64
Placebo (Sugar Pill)6.74197.36

[back to top]

Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale

"Designed in 1979 by researchers as an adjunct to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) which would be more sensitive to the changes brought on by antidepressants and other forms of treatment than the Hamilton Scale. MADRS was used to assess symptoms during the open label antidepressant treatment phase, so results are described as mean scores at each bi-weekly visit.~Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60 where 0 is no depression and 60 is most extreme depression.~The questionnaire includes questions on the following symptoms 1. Apparent sadness 2. Reported sadness 3. Inner tension 4. Reduced sleep 5. Reduced appetite 6. Concentration difficulties 7. Lassitude 8. Inability to feel 9. Pessimistic thoughts 10. Suicidal thoughts~Usual cutoff points are:~0 to 6 - normal[5] /symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression >34 - severe depression" (NCT02178696)
Timeframe: Screening, week 0, week 2, week 4, week 8 and week 10

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baselineweek 0week 2week 4week 8week 10
MADRS Scores During the Open-label Antidepressant Treatment27221513117.7

[back to top]

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Scores

"The total score is obtained by summing the score of each item, 0-4 (symptom is absent, mild, moderate, or severe) or 0-2 (absent, slight or trivial, clearly present). For the 17-item version, scores can range from 0 to 54, with 0 meaning no depression, and 54, severe depression.~The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was used to assess symptoms during the open label antidepressant treatment phase, so results are described as mean scores at each bi-weekly visit." (NCT02178696)
Timeframe: Screening, week 0, week 2, week 4, week 8 and week 10

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Screeningweek 0week 2Week 4week 8week 10
Open-label Antidepressant Treatment After Placebo Experiment2117.213.3118.655.3

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR-16) Score

"This scale is a self-report measure of depression with 16 items.~Questions in the QIDS - SR-116 correlate with the nine DSM-IV symptom criterion domains, Including: Sleep disturbance (initial, middle, and late insomnia or hypersomnia) (Q 1 - 4), Sad mood (Q 5), Decrease/increase in appetite/weight (Q 6 - 9), Concentration (Q 10), Self-criticism (Q 11), Suicidal ideation (Q 12), Interest (Q 13), Energy/fatigue (Q 14), Psychomotor agitation/retardation (Q 15 - 16).~Severity of depression can be judged based on the total score: 1-5= No depression; 6-10= Mild depression; 11-15= Moderate depression; 16-20= Severe depression; 21-27= Very severe depression.~The PHQ-9 and QIDS were used to assess changes in mood during the placebo intervention (first 2 weeks), and therefore results are described as changes from the inactive to the active condition." (NCT02178696)
Timeframe: From Pre to post- active placebo, and from pre to post- inactive placebo (1 week intervention)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Active Placebo1.7
Inactive Placebo-0.5

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in PHQ-9 Depression Scores.

"The Patient Health Questionnaire-9, is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression, based on participant answers. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represents mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression, respectively. The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum possible score is 27.~The PHQ-9 and QIDS were used to assess changes in mood during the placebo intervention (first 2 weeks), and therefore results are described as changes from the inactive to the active condition." (NCT02178696)
Timeframe: From Pre to post- active placebo, and from pre to post- inactive placebo (1 week intervention)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Active Placebo1.6
Inactive Placebo0.96

[back to top]

Changes in BOLD Response During Reward fMRI Task (Monetary Incentive Delay, MID)

% BOLD signal changes in the nucleus accumbens from the Inactive to the Active Placebo condition. (NCT02178696)
Timeframe: (90 minute fMRI scans) assessed at Weeks 1 and 2

Intervention% BOLD changes from Inactive to Active (Mean)
Changes in BOLD Responses During the MID After Placebo0.04

[back to top]

Changes in Mu-opioid Binding Potential During PET

"Binding Potential = Bmax/Kd (receptor concentration/affinity). This is the most common measure of in vivo receptor binding with positron emission tomography. Whole brain changes in mu-opioid receptors binding potential during PET from the Inactive to the Active placebo condition.~Positive numbers presented here represent reductions in binding potential from the inactive to the active condition." (NCT02178696)
Timeframe: (90 minute PET scans) assessed at Weeks 1 and 2

InterventionBinding potential ratio (Mean)
Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo)0.12

[back to top]

Changes in Dopamine (D 2/3) Binding Potential During PET.

"Binding Potential= Bmax/Kd (receptor concentration/affinity). This is the most common measure of in vivo receptor binding with PET.~Striatal changes in D2/3 receptor binding potential during PET from the Inactive to the Active condition.~Positive numbers presented here represented reductions in binding potential from the inactive to the active condition." (NCT02178696)
Timeframe: (90 minute PET scan) assessed at Weeks 1 and 2

InterventionBinding potential ratio (Mean)
Average Regional Changes in D2/3 Binding (Inactive-Active Plac0.08

[back to top]

"Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Score of 1 (Very Much Improved) or 2 (Much Improved) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8"

"For CGI-I rating, the raters indicated their assessment of the participant's total improvement or worsening compared to the participant's condition at the Baseline visit, whether or not the improvement or worsening was thought to be treatment related. Scores ranges from 0 to 7 where 0 represents Not assessed, and the remaining values 1-7 represent Very much improved (1) to Very much worse (7). Participants with score 0 were excluded from analysis. All participants in the PP population were analyzed and n=X in the category titles represented the number of participants with data available at the specified time points." (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Week 1, n=184, 199Week 2, n=182, 199Week 4, n=184, 198Week 6, n=183, 197Week 8, n=176, 188
Bupropion XL621.438.667.880.7
Escitalopram7.522.152.571.683.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Vital Sign Parameters Outside the Clinical Concern Range

Vital signs including systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR) were taken at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing), randomization visit (Week 0) and at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). SBP <30 or >170 millimeter of mercury (mmHg); DBP <20 or >110 mmHg and heart rate <40 or >120 beats per minute (bpm) were considered as values outside of clinical concern range and were presented as 'High' or 'Low' values. Number of participants with vital signs outside of clinical concern range at any post-Baseline visit are presented. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed. (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
SBP, high, Any visit post-BaselineSBP, low,Any visit post-BaselineDBP, high, Any visit post-BaselineDBP, low, Any visit post-BaselineHR, high, Any visit post-BaselineHR, low, Any visit post-Baseline
Bupropion XL100000
Escitalopram000010

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Retardation Subscale Score (Sum of Scores of Items 1, 7, 8 and 14) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

HAMD-17 is an extensively used tool to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement during the treatment. The HAMD-17 adopted for this study consisted of 17 questions with multiple choice responses, each of which is numerically scored. The HAMD-17 Retardation subscale score was derived as sum of scores of items 1, 7, 8 and 14 from HAMD-17. This subscale has a score in a range of 0 (absence of condition) to 14 (most severe condition). Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline response from the specific post-Baseline response. All participants in the PP population were analyzed and n=X in the category titles represented the number of participants with data available at the specified time points. (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1, n=184, 199Week 2, n=182, 199Week 4, n=184, 198Week 6, n=183, 197Week 8, n=176, 188
Bupropion XL-1.0-1.8-2.9-3.9-4.7
Escitalopram-1.0-2.0-3.1-3.9-4.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH) at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,
InterventionPicograms (Mean)
MCH, Week 8, n=176, 183MCH, Taper, n=13, 16MCH, Follow-up, n=10, 8
Bupropion XL-0.0320.269-0.050
Escitalopram0.0490.262-0.250

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) Score at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

"CGI-S records the severity of illness at specific time points, with a range of responses from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Participants with zero values (0) representing Not assessed were excluded from analysis. Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline value. All participants in the PP population were analyzed and n=X in the category titles represented the number of participants with data available at the specified time points." (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1, n=184, 199Week 2, n=182, 199Week 4, n=184, 198Week 6, n=183, 197Week 8, n=176, 188
Bupropion XL-0.3-0.7-1.1-1.6-2.1
Escitalopram-0.4-0.8-1.3-1.7-2.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Triglyceride and Urea at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,
InterventionMillimole per liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
Calcium, Week 8, n=173, 183Calcium, Taper, n=12, 12Calcium, Follow-up, n=8, 11Chloride, Week 8, n=173, 182Chloride, Taper, n=10, 13Chloride, Follow-up, n=8, 8Cholesterol, Week 8, n=175, 181Cholesterol, Taper, n=12, 14Cholesterol, Follow-up, n=9, 11Glucose, Week 8, n=173, 181Glucose, Taper, n=12, 16Glucose, Follow-up, n=9, 11Potassium, Week 8, n=173, 182Potassium, Taper, n=10, 13Potassium, Follow-up, n=8, 8Sodium, Week 8, n=173, 182Sodium, Taper, n=10, 13Sodium, Follow-up, n=8, 8Triglycerides, Week 8, n=175, 181Triglycerides, Taper, n=13, 15Triglycerides, Follow-up, n=9, 11Urea, Week 8, n=174, 183Urea, Taper, n=12, 16Urea, Follow-up, n=8, 11
Bupropion XL-0.017-0.019-0.0600.259-0.498-0.287-0.1220.022-0.124-0.0510.352-0.194-0.021-0.114-0.110-0.205-0.611-0.1750.003-0.0320.637-0.0680.5170.687
Escitalopram-0.0200.012-0.060-0.293-0.566-0.1780.0510.082-0.122-0.0500.1060.0250.0090.0460.036-0.1780.9780.7700.0220.5740.1810.015-0.269-0.419

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Gamma-glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGT) and Lactose Dehydrogenase (LD) at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,
InterventionInternational Units per liter (IU/L) (Mean)
ALT, Week 8, n=176, 183ALT, Taper, n=12, 16ALT, Follow-up, n=8, 12ALP, Week 8, n=176, 181ALP, Taper, n=12, 15ALP, Follow-up, n=7, 12AST, Week 8, n=176, 183AST, Taper, n=12, 16AST, Follow-up, n=8, 12GGT, Week 8, n=175, 181GGT, Taper, n=12, 15GGT, Follow-up, n=7, 12LD, Week 8, n=176, 182LD, Taper, n=13, 13LD, Follow-up, n=8, 10
Bupropion XL2.2547.993-7.3371.8663.6745.6430.3303.1930.9250.6881.403-2.0291.29214.46311.037
Escitalopram1.315-1.8125.9380.4073.480-3.9531.0990.3812.867-0.694-3.1333.9162.879-8.092-4.150

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Urinalysis Data Outside the Normal Range

Urine samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Number of participants with urine specific gravity and potential of hydrogen (pH) outside (higher or lower) the normal range are presented. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Urine specific gravity, high,Screening, n=265, 255Urine specific gravity, low,Screening, n=265, 255Urine specific gravity,high, Week 8, n=171, 173Urine specific gravity,low, Week 8, n=171, 173Urine specific gravity, high, Taper, n=18, 28Urine specific gravity, low, Taper, n=18, 28Urine specific gravity, high, Follow-up, n=7, 14Urine specific gravity, low, Follow-up, n=7, 14Urine pH, high, Screening, n=265, 266Urine pH, low, Screening, n=265, 266Urine pH, high, Week 8, n=172, 178Urine pH, low, Week 8, n=172, 178Urine pH, high, Taper, n=18, 28Urine pH, low, Taper, n=18, 28Urine pH, high, Follow-up, n=7, 14Urine pH, low, Follow-up, n=7, 14
Bupropion XL2019000007375230202
Escitalopram12171013018289201202

[back to top]

Sustained Response Rate Based on HAMD-17 Total Score

HAMD-17 is an extensively used tool to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement during the treatment. The HAMD-17 adopted for this study consisted of 17 questions with multiple choice responses, each of which is numerically scored. The HAMD-17 total score is calculated by summing the individual response scores if there is no missing response. HAMD-17 has a total score in a range of 0 (not present) to 52 (severe). Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Sustained response was defined as response at end of acute treatment phase and an earlier visit and the decrease from Baseline in non-missing HAMD-17 total scores at all visits between these two visits by at least 40%. (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Up to Week 8

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Bupropion XL51.6
Escitalopram56.3

[back to top]

Sustained Remission Rate Based on HAMD-17 Total Score

HAMD-17 is an extensively used tool to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement during the treatment. The HAMD-17 adopted for this study consisted of 17 questions with multiple choice responses, each of which is numerically scored. The HAMD-17 total score is calculated by summing the individual response scores if there is no missing response. HAMD-17 has a total score in a range of 0 (not present) to 52 (severe). Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Sustained remission was defined as remission at end of acute treatment phase and an earlier visit and non-missing HAMD-17 total scores at all visits between these two visits <=8. (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Up to Week 8

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Bupropion XL25.5
Escitalopram28.6

[back to top]

Response Rate Based on HAMD-17 Total Score

HAMD-17 is an extensively used tool to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement during the treatment. The HAMD-17 adopted for this study consisted of 17 questions with multiple choice responses, each of which is numerically scored. The HAMD-17 total score is calculated by summing the individual response scores if there is no missing response. HAMD-17 has a total score in a range of 0 (not present) to 52 (severe). Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Response was defined as decrease in HAMD-17 total scores at end of acute treatment phase (Week 8) relative to Baseline by at least 50%. Non-responder Imputation was used in calculation of rates. (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Up to Week 8

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Bupropion XL69.6
Escitalopram72.9

[back to top]

Remission Rate Based on HAMD-17 Total Score

HAMD-17 is an extensively used tool to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement during the treatment. The HAMD-17 adopted for this study consisted of 17 questions with multiple choice responses, each of which is numerically scored. The HAMD-17 total score is calculated by summing the individual response scores if there is no missing response. HAMD-17 has a total score in a range of 0 (not present) to 52 (severe). Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Remission was defined as HAMD-17 total scores at end of acute treatment phase (Week 8) <=7. (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Up to Week 8

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Bupropion XL39.7
Escitalopram47.2

[back to top]

Mean Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - 17 (HAMD-17) Total Score From Baseline to End of Acute Treatment Phase (Week 8)

HAMD-17 is used to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement. It consisted of 17 questions. The HAMD-17 total score is calculated by summing the individual response scores if there is no missing response. HAMD-17 has a total score in a range of 0 (not present) to 52 (severe). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline total score (at Day 0, Week 0) from Week 8 observed total score. The Per Protocol (PP) Population is defined as all randomized participants in the Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Population who do not meet criteria of a major protocol deviation, with overall compliance of active drug for acute treatment phase in the range of 75%-125% and complete the first 6 weeks treatment and has HAMD-17 assessment at/after week 6 (that is >=35 days). All participants in the PP population were included in the mixed model repeated measures analysis. Only those participants with data available at the specified time point were analyzed. (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 8

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Bupropion XL-14.5
Escitalopram-15.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Changes in Sexual Function Questionnaire (CSFQ)

CSFQ is a questionnaire about sexual activity and sexual function (sexual intercourse, masturbation, sexual fantasies and other activity). CSFQ is a gender-specific questionnaire. Both male and female versions consist of 14 items, each with 5 possible answers. CSFQ has a score in a range of 14 to 70. Higher score indicates higher sexual activity and sexual function. Value at Day 0 (Week 0) was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline at Week 8 was calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from the specific post-Baseline score. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed. (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 8

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Bupropion XL3.0
Escitalopram0.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,
InterventionProportion of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
Hematocrit, Week 8, n=176, 183Hematocrit, Taper, n=13, 16Hematocrit, Follow-up, n=10, 8
Bupropion XL0.0016-0.0051-0.0076
Escitalopram-0.00440.00170.0051

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Depressed Mood Subscale Score (Score of Item 1) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

HAMD-17 is an extensively used tool to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement during the treatment. The HAMD-17 adopted for this study consisted of 17 questions with multiple choice responses, each of which is numerically scored. The HAMD-17 Depressed Mood Subscale is a factor score of item-1 (Depressed Mood) of HAMD-17 scale. This subscale has a score in a range of 0 (absence of depressed mood feelings) to 4 (when participants report virtually only these feeling states in his/her spontaneous verbal and non-verbal communicationtotal score). Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline response from the specific post-Baseline response. All participants in the PP population were analyzed and n=X in the category titles represented the number of participants with data available at the specified time points. (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1, n=184, 199Week 2, n=182, 199Week 4, n=184, 198Week 6, n=183, 197Week 8, n=176, 188
Bupropion XL-0.4-0.7-1.1-1.5-1.9
Escitalopram-0.4-0.8-1.3-1.6-1.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Anxiety/Somatization Subscale Score (Sum of Scores of Items 10, 11, 12, 13, 15 and 17) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

HAMD-17 is an extensively used tool to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement during the treatment. The HAMD-17 adopted for this study consisted of 17 questions with multiple choice responses, each of which is numerically scored. The HAMD-17 Anxiety/Somatization subscale score was derived as sum of scores of items 10, 11, 12, 13, 15 and 17 from HAMD-17. This subscale has a score in a range of 0 (absence of condition) to 18 (most severe condition). Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline response from the specific post-Baseline response. All participants in the PP population were analyzed and n=X in the category titles represented the number of participants with data available at the specified time points. (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1, n=184, 199Week 2, n=182, 199Week 4, n=184, 198Week 6, n=183, 197Week 8, n=176, 188
Bupropion XL-1.3-2.0-3.0-4.0-4.8
Escitalopram-1.1-2.4-3.4-4.4-5.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Sleep Disorder Subscale Score (Sum of Scores of Items 4, 5 and 6) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

HAMD-17 is an extensively used tool to assess the severity of depression and symptom improvement during the treatment. The HAMD-17 adopted for this study consisted of 17 questions with multiple choice responses, each of which is numerically scored. The HAMD-17 Sleep Disorder subscale score was derived as sum of scores of items 4, 5 and 6 from HAMD-17. This subscale has a score in a range of 0 (absence of condition) to 6 (most severe condition). Values at Day 0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline response from the specific post-Baseline response. All participants in the PP population were analyzed and n=X in the category titles represented the number of participants with data available at the specified time points. (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1, n=184, 199Week 2, n=182, 199Week 4, n=184, 198Week 6, n=183, 197Week 8, n=176, 188
Bupropion XL-0.6-0.8-1.4-1.8-2.3
Escitalopram-0.7-1.2-1.6-2.0-2.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin, Total Protein, Albumin and Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,
InterventionGram per Liter (G/L) (Mean)
Hemoglobin, Week 8, n=176, 183Hemoglobin, Taper, n=13, 16Hemoglobin, Follow-up, n=10, 8Total protein, Week 8, n=174, 183Total protein, Taper, n=12, 15Total protein, Follow-up, n=8, 12Albumin, Week 8, n=175, 183Albumin, Taper, n=12, 15Albumin, Follow-up, n=8, 12MCHC, Week 8, n=176, 183MCHC, Taper, n=13, 16MCHC, Follow-up, n=10, 8
Bupropion XL-0.22-1.54-3.10-0.6401.197-4.650-0.254-0.086-1.925-0.090.54-2.10
Escitalopram-1.161.380.38-0.8912.000-1.227-0.678-0.027-1.5770.762.25-2.88

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV) at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,
InterventionFemtoliter (Mean)
MCV, Week 8, n=176, 183MCV, Taper, n=13, 16MCV, Follow-up, n=10, 8
Bupropion XL4.6680.5080.320
Escitalopram-0.0900.1810.287

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

MADRS is a 10-point rating scale. Each item is scored on a scale of 0-6, with a total score range of 0-60. Higher score indicates worst symptoms. This scale is mainly used to assess the efficacy of antidepressant treatment. The ratings were based on the signs and symptoms during the preceding week prior to the visit. Values at Day0, Week 0 was considered as Baseline value. The observed MADRS total score was considered as missing if any item is missing. Change from Baseline in MADRS was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline value. All participants in the PP population were analyzed and n=X in the category titles represented the number of participants with data available at the specified time points. (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1, n=184, 199Week 2, n=182, 199Week 4, n=184, 198Week 6, n=183, 196Week 8, n=176, 188
Bupropion XL-3.6-7.0-11.2-15.5-18.6
Escitalopram-3.8-8.3-12.4-16.3-19.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,
Intervention10^12 cells per liter (Mean)
RBC Count, Week 8, n=176, 183RBC Count, Taper, n=13, 16RBC Count, Follow-up, n=10, 8
Bupropion XL-0.009-0.088-0.132
Escitalopram-0.049-0.0070.036

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin and Creatinine at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,
InterventionMicromoles per liter (µmol/L) (Mean)
Total bilirubin, Week 8, n=175, 181Total bilirubin, Taper, n=12, 15Total bilirubin, Follow-up, n=8, 12Direct bilirubin, Week 8, n=175, 180Direct bilirubin, Taper, n=11, 15Direct bilirubin, Follow-up, n=8, 12Creatinine, Week 8, n=174, 183Creatinine, Taper, n=12, 15Creatinine, Follow-up, n=8, 11
Bupropion XL-0.812-3.4570.382-0.072-1.554-0.1027.5076.6754.237
Escitalopram-0.0711.1980.338-0.0060.6540.3820.3070.8801.618

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Total Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Basophil, Eosinophil, Monocyte and Platelet Count at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). Baseline was considered as the value obtained at Screening. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the specific post-Baseline values. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,
InterventionGiga cells per liter (GI/L) (Mean)
WBC count, Week 8, n=176, 183WBC count, Taper, n=13, 16WBC count, Follow-up, n=10, 8Total Neutrophils, Week 8, n=176, 183Total Neutrophils, Taper, n=13, 16Total Neutrophils, Follow-up, n=10, 8Lymphocytes, Week 8, n=176, 183Lymphocytes, Taper, n=13, 16Lymphocytes, Follow-up, n=10, 8Basophil, Week 8, n=176, 182Basophil, Taper, n=13, 16Basophil, Follow-up, n=10, 8Eosinophil, Week 8, n=176, 182Eosinophil, Taper, n=13, 16Eosinophil, Follow-up, n=10, 8Monocyte, Week 8, n=176, 182Monocyte, Taper, n=13, 16Monocyte, Follow-up, n=10, 8Platelet count, Week 8, n=176, 183Platelet count, Taper, n=13, 16Platelet count, Follow-up, n=10, 8
Bupropion XL-0.0320.065-0.7430.1010.306-0.869-0.154-0.2420.0420.0010.001-0.003-0.004-0.012-0.0050.021-0.0010.0587.7317.1528.50
Escitalopram-0.073-0.7150.427-0.165-0.7720.4240.0720.0770.0220.0020.001-0.0120.0100.0060.0190.003-0.0310.0100.567.195.38

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Non-serious Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious AE (SAE)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention or all events of possible drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinemia were categorized as SAE. Participants who received any of the study treatment and had any non-serious AE or SAE were considered for analysis. Safety Population comprised of all participants who took at least one dose of the study medication. (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any non-serious AEAny SAE
Bupropion XL15110
Escitalopram15011

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range

ECG was recorded at Screening (within 14 days prior to dosing) and at Week 8, Taper visit (Week 9) and Follow-up visit (Week 10). PR interval <110 or >220 millisecond (msec); QRS interval <60 or >120 msec and corrected QT (QTc) interval >450 msec were considered as values outside of clinical concern range and were presented as 'High' or 'Low' values. Number of participants with ECG data outside of clinical concern range at any post-Baseline visit are presented. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed. (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
PR interval, high, Any visit post-randomizationPR interval, low,Any visit post-randomizationQRS interval, high, Any visit post-randomizationQRS interval, low, Any visit post-randomizationQTc interval, high, Any visit post-randomizationQTc interval, low, Any visit post-randomization
Bupropion XL052010
Escitalopram023130

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior During Treatment Assessed by Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

"C-SSRS is an assessment tool that evaluates suicidal ideation and behavior. It consists of 10 items, each with two possible answers (yes/no). Suicidal ideation was interpreted if yes answer at any time during treatment to any one of the five suicidal ideation questions (item 1-5) on the C-SSRS. Suicidal behavior was interpreted if a yes answer at any time during treatment to any one of the five suicidal behavior questions (item 6-10) on the C-SSRS. Suicidal ideation or behavior is interpreted if a yes answer at any time during treatment to any one of the ten suicidal ideation and behavior questions (item 1-10) on the C-SSRS. Number of participants with at least one on-treatment C-SSRS assessment were analyzed. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed." (NCT02191397)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Taper visit (Week 9)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Suicidal Ideation or BehaviorSuicidal IdeationSuicidal BehaviorSelf-Injurious Behavior, no suicidal attempt
Bupropion XL505021
Escitalopram434311

[back to top]

IL10 Levels

IL10 levels were measured in participants by blood draw 6 weeks after the first dose was given (NCT02389465)
Timeframe: up to 6 weeks

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Healthy Control4.21
Placebo64.9
Escitalopram12.24
Escitalopram + Celecoxib18.56

[back to top]

IL-6 Levels

IL6 levels were measured in participants by blood draw 6 weeks after the first dose was given. (NCT02389465)
Timeframe: up to week 6

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Healthy Control5.25
Placebo18.24
Escitalopram3.69
Escitalopram + Celecoxib6.84

[back to top]

Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

"This depression rating scale will be used to determine clinical outcome for depressed participants.~Scores range from 0-60. The higher the score, the worse the outcome (see below)~Normal: 0-6 Mild Depression: 7-19 Moderate Depression: 20-34 Severe Depression: 35+ Very Severe Depression: 60" (NCT02389465)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionTotal Score (Sum of Points) (Mean)
Healthy Control1.27
Placebo19.14
Escitalopram14.04
Escitalopram + Celecoxib12.93

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impression-1

General impression of symptoms by clinician. Minimum=1, Maximum=7. The higher value on the scale, the more symptomatic the patient is. The percent difference between week 0 and the last observation was calculated. (NCT02473250)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionPercent change in CGI score (Mean)
Bipolar Depressed27.17

[back to top]

Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale

Anxiety severity. Minimum=0, Maximum=56. The larger the value on the scale, the more intense the anxiety. The percent difference between week 0 and the last observation was calculated. (NCT02473250)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionPercent change in HAMA score (Mean)
Bipolar Depressed13.95

[back to top]

Young Mania Rating Scale

Measure of manic symptoms. Minimum=0, Maximum=60. The higher the value on the scale, the more intense the manic symptoms. The maximum value of YMRS over the six week clinical trial is reported. (NCT02473250)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Bipolar Depressed5.75

[back to top]

Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale

Depression severity. Minimum=0, Maximum=60. Higher numbers correspond to greater depression severity. The percent change between week 0 and the last observation was calculated. (NCT02473250)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionPercent change in MADRS from baseline (Mean)
Bipolar Depressed39.24

[back to top]

Change of Mean Score of the Behavioral Health Measure-20 Between Baseline and End of Study

The Behavioral Health Measure - 20 (BHM-20) is a 20-item client-report questionnaire that assesses the three phases of behavioral health: (a) well-being (distress, life satisfaction, motivation), (b) psychological symptoms (depression, anxiety, panic disorder, mood swings associated with bipolar disorder, eating disorder, alcohol/drug abuse, suicidality, risk of violence), and (c) life functioning (work/school, intimate relationships, social relationships, life enjoyment). The BHM-20 assesses the most frequently seen problems in outpatient psychotherapy. Scores range from 0-4. Lower scores indicate more distress. (NCT02579343)
Timeframe: Assessed at Baseline and After Treatment, Approximately 6 Weeks later.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Auricular Acupuncture + Lexipro0.89
Sham Auricular Acupuncture + Lexapro0.47

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Score of the Sheehan Disability Scale Through 6 Weeks

Instrument developed to assess functional impairment in three inter-related domains; work/school, social and family life. Items are scored on a 0 - 10 point scale. Higher scores indicate more functional impairment. (NCT02579343)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and 6 weeks.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Work / School DomainSocial Life DomainFamily Life Domain
Auricular Acupuncture + Lexipro-3.57-2.29-3.42
Sham Auricular Acupuncture + Lexapro-1.5-1.0-0.17

[back to top]

Cognitive Impairment Scale

The investigators will use the National Study on the Costs and Outcomes of Trauma (NSCOT) Cognitive Screen, a 4 - Item Traumatic Brain Injury / Post-concussive Symptom Screen. The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 4 to a maximum of 20, with lower scores indicating a worse outcome. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention13.513.313.213.8
Usual Care13.413.213.414.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Short Form (SF)-12/36 Physical Function Over the Course of the Year After Injury

The investigators used the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form healthy survey (MOS SF-12/36) physical components summary to assess physical function. The minimum and maximum scores are 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change from Baseline at 3 MonthsChange from Baseline at 6 MonthsChange from Baseline at 12 Months
Intervention-16.78-14.17-13.23
Usual Care-15.90-13.83-11.68

[back to top]

Change From Baseline PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C) Over the Course of the Year After Injury

The investigators will use the PTSD Checklist - Civilian (PCL-C). The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 17 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. The measure can also provide a rating of symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of PTSD. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change from Baseline at 3 MonthsChange from Baseline at 6 MonthsChange from Baseline at 12 Months
Intervention-1.65-4.02-5.51
Usual Care0.08-1.44-4.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Item Depression Scale Over the Course of the Year After Injury

The investigators will use the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item Depression Scale (PHQ-9). The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 27, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change from Baseline at 3 MonthsChange from Baseline at 6 MonthsChange from Baseline at 12 Months
Intervention-0.79-1.17-1.84
Usual Care-0.50-0.90-2.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Over the Course of the Year After Injury

The investigators will use the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a continuous measure. The 10-item scale score ranges from 0-40, with higher values indicating a worse outcome. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change from Baseline at 3 MonthsChange from Baseline at 6 MonthsChange from Baseline at 12 Months
Intervention-2.04-1.69-1.81
Usual Care-1.90-1.63-1.45

[back to top]

Brief Pain Inventory

A brief measure scored on a 0 to 10 scale to assess a patient's pain, with a higher score indicating more severe pain; a score of 0 indicates no pain and a score of 10 indicates very severe pain. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention6.84.34.13.9
Usual Care6.74.74.53.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation

Item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ-9) scale assesses suicidal ideation. It is scored from 0 to 3, with a score of 1 or greater indicating a patient has suicidal ideation. Participants with a PHQ-9 item 9 score of greater than or equal to 1 are reported for this outcome. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention67696351
Usual Care909910692

[back to top]

TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Overall Health Care

Satisfaction with health care was rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 indicating very dissatisfied and 5 indicating very satisfied. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention4.43.94.03.9
Usual Care4.43.83.83.8

[back to top]

TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Mental Health Care

Satisfaction with mental health care was rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 indicating very dissatisfied and 5 indicating very satisfied. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 Month, 6 Month, 12 Month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention4.13.63.63.7
Usual Care4.03.53.43.5

[back to top]

SF-36 Quality of Life

The SF-36 assess quality of life domains that span emotional health, overall health status, and role function; a score of 100 indicates perfect health and a score of 0 indicates extremely poor health. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention44.338.338.439.2
Usual Care45.139.139.541.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Stimulant Use

Single items that assess non-prescribed stimulant use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention58978
Usual Care77172216

[back to top]

Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Opioid Use

Single items that assess non-prescribed opioid use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention18446
Usual Care4415206

[back to top]

Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Marijuana Use

Single items that assess marijuana use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention125606051
Usual Care177728279

[back to top]

Rate of Adherence

To determine whether RT2CK17 + escitalopram results in higher rates of medication adherence relative to placebo + escitalopram as measured by percentage pill count (NCT03388164)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of pills taken (Mean)
Escitalopram + RT2CK1793.5
Escitalopram + Placebo97.6

[back to top]

Adherence Consistency

To determine whether RT2CK17 + escitalopram results in greater consistency of adherence relative to placebo + escitalopram as measured by percentage of doses taken on schedule within 25% of the expected time interval, defined as +/- 6 hours from the participant's breakfast time (NCT03388164)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of pills taken on time (Mean)
Escitalopram + RT2CK1789.8
Escitalopram + Placebo93.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the HAMD-17 Total Score Around End of Blinded Treatment

The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of individual ratings related to following symptoms: depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia, work and activities, retardation, agitation, anxiety, somatic symptoms, genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either 3-point (0=none to 2=severe) or 5-point scale (0=none/absent to 4=most severe). Total score is the sum of individual items, ranging from 0 (not depressed) to 52 (severely depressed); where a higher score indicates more depression. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. End of blinded treatment was defined as the average of change from baseline values of Days 12, 15 and 18. LS mean was estimated using MMRM analysis. (NCT04476030)
Timeframe: Baseline, End of blinded treatment assessment (i.e., average of Days 12, 15 , and 18)

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + Assigned ADT-12.7
SAGE-217 + Assigned ADT-13.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the HAMD-17 Total Score at Day 3

The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of individual ratings related to following symptoms: depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia, work and activities, retardation, agitation, anxiety, somatic symptoms, genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either 3-point (0=none to 2=severe) or 5-point scale (0=none/absent to 4=most severe). Total score is the sum of individual items, ranging from 0 (not depressed) to 52 (severely depressed); where a higher score indicates more depression. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Least Squares (LS) mean was estimated using mixed effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. (NCT04476030)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 3

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + Assigned ADT-7.0
SAGE-217 + Assigned ADT-8.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the HAMD-17 Total Score Over the Double-Blind Treatment Period

The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of individual ratings related to following symptoms: depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia, work and activities, retardation, agitation, anxiety, somatic symptoms, genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either 3-point (0=none to 2=severe) or 5-point scale (0=none/absent to 4=most severe). Total score is the sum of individual items, ranging from 0 (not depressed) to 52 (severely depressed); where a higher score indicates more depression. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM analysis. The data reported is summary of data collected and analyzed during double-blind treatment period at Baseline, Day 3, Day 8, Day 12, and Day 15 using equal weights for the scheduled visits. (NCT04476030)
Timeframe: Baseline through Day 15

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + Assigned ADT-10.1
SAGE-217 + Assigned ADT-11.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With MADRS Remission at Day 15

MADRS remission was defined as having a MADRS total score of ≤10. The MADRS is a 10-item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in participants with mood disorders. The MADRS total score was calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores. Each item yields a score of 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The total MADRS score (sum of all individual items) ranges from 0 (symptoms absent) to 60 (severe depression). Higher MADRS scores indicated more severe depression. Percentages were rounded off to the first decimal point. (NCT04476030)
Timeframe: Day 15

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + Assigned ADT28.4
SAGE-217 + Assigned ADT30.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With MADRS Response at Day 15

MADRS response was defined as having a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in MADRS total score. The MADRS is a 10-item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in participants with mood disorders. The MADRS total score was calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores. Each item yields a score of 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The total MADRS score (sum of all individual items) ranges from 0 (symptoms absent) to 60 (severe depression). Higher MADRS scores indicated more severe depression. Percentages were rounded off to the first decimal point. (NCT04476030)
Timeframe: Day 15

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + Assigned ADT48.2
SAGE-217 + Assigned ADT51.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CGI-S Score at Day 15

The CGI-S uses a 7-point Likert scale to rate the severity of the participant's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with participants who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, the investigator rated the participant on severity of mental illness at the time of rating as: 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = extremely ill. A higher score indicated extreme illness. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM analysis. (NCT04476030)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 15

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Active Comparator: Placebo + Assigned ADT-1.7
Experimental: SAGE-217 + Assigned ADT-1.9

[back to top]

Time to First HAMD-17 Response

HAM-D response was defined as having a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in HAM-D total score. The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of individual ratings related to following symptoms: depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia, work and activities, retardation, agitation, anxiety, somatic symptoms, genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either 3-point (0=none to 2=severe) or 5-point scale (0=none/absent to 4=most severe). Total score is the sum of individual items, ranging from 0 (not depressed) to 52 (severely depressed); where a higher score indicates more depression. Time (in days) from first dose of study drug to time of first HAMD response was reported in this outcome measure. (NCT04476030)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to first HAMD-17 response (up to approximately 65 days)

Interventiondays (Median)
Placebo + Assigned ADT15
SAGE-217 + Assigned ADT13

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the HAMD-17 Total Score at Days 15 and 42

The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of individual ratings related to following symptoms: depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia, work and activities, retardation, agitation, anxiety, somatic symptoms, genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either 3-point (0=none to 2=severe) or 5-point scale (0=none/absent to 4=most severe). Total score is the sum of individual items, ranging from 0 (not depressed) to 52 (severely depressed); where a higher score indicates more depression. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM analysis. The missing values were imputed for the analysis. (NCT04476030)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 15 and 42

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Day 15Day 42
Placebo + Assigned ADT-12.9-14.9
SAGE-217 + Assigned ADT-13.7-14.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE was defined as an AE with onset after the start of IP, or any worsening of a pre-existing medical condition/AE with onset after the start of IP and throughout the study. (NCT04476030)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 58 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + Assigned ADT65.6
SAGE-217 + Assigned ADT74.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CGI-I Response, at Day 3 and Day 15

"CGI-I response was defined as having a CGI-I score of very much improved or much improved. The CGI-I employs a 7-point Likert scale to measure the overall improvement in the participant's condition post-treatment. The investigator rated the participant's total improvement whether or not it was due entirely to IP. Response choices included: 0 = not assessed, 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. By definition, all CGI-I assessments are evaluated against baseline conditions. Higher scores indicated worse condition. Percentages were rounded off to the first decimal point." (NCT04476030)
Timeframe: Days 3 and 15

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 3Day 15
Placebo + Assigned ADT12.954.3
SAGE-217 + Assigned ADT22.956.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HAMD-17 Remission at Day 15 and Day 42

HAM-D remission was defined as having a HAM-D total score of ≤7. The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of individual ratings related to following symptoms: depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia, work and activities, retardation, agitation, anxiety, somatic symptoms, genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either 3-point (0=none to 2=severe) or 5-point scale (0=none/absent to 4=most severe). Total score is the sum of individual items, ranging from 0 (not depressed) to 52 (severely depressed); where a higher score indicates more depression. Percentages were rounded off to the first decimal point. (NCT04476030)
Timeframe: Days 15 and 42

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 15Day 42
Placebo + Assigned ADT21.839.2
SAGE-217 + Assigned ADT29.137.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HAMD-17 Response at Day 15 and Day 42

HAM-D response was defined as having a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in HAM-D total score. The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of individual ratings related to following symptoms: depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia, work and activities, retardation, agitation, anxiety, somatic symptoms, genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either 3-point (0=none to 2=severe) or 5-point scale (0=none/absent to 4=most severe). Total score is the sum of individual items, ranging from 0 (not depressed) to 52 (severely depressed); where a higher score indicates more depression. Percentages were rounded off to the first decimal point. (NCT04476030)
Timeframe: At Days 15 and 42

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 15Day 42
Placebo + Assigned ADT49.265.3
SAGE-217 + Assigned ADT53.459.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Graded by Severity

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE was defined as an AE with onset after the start of IP, or any worsening of a pre-existing medical condition/AE with onset after the start of IP and throughout the study. The severity was graded as mild, moderate and severe. (NCT04476030)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 58 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
MildModerateSevere
Placebo + Assigned ADT38.125.22.3
SAGE-217 + Assigned ADT35.834.43.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Depressive Symptoms at Day 15, as Assessed by PHQ-9

The PHQ-9 is a participant-rated depressive symptom severity scale. The PHQ-9 total score is calculated as the sum of the 9 individual item scores. For individual items, scoring is based on responses to specific questions, as follows: 0 = not at all; 1 = several days; 2 = more than half the days; and 3 = nearly every day. The PHQ-9 possible total score range is 0 to 27, with higher scores reflecting greater depressive symptoms, and is categorized as follows: 0 to 4 = minimal depression, 5 to 9 = mild depression, 10 to 14 = moderate depression, 15 to 19 = moderately severe depression, and 20 to 27 = severe depression. Negative change from baseline indicated improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM analysis. (NCT04476030)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 15

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + Assigned ADT-8.7
SAGE-217 + Assigned ADT-8.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HAM-A Total Score at Day 15

Each of the 14 items in the HAM-A was defined by a series of symptoms, and measured both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints). The HAM-A total score was calculated as sum of the 14 individual item scores, each rated on a five point scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (very severe). The total score (sum of all individual items) range from 0 to 56, where <17 indicated mild severity, 18 to 24 indicated mild to moderate severity, and 25 to 30 indicated moderate to severe severity. Higher scores indicated more severe disease. Negative change from baseline indicated improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM analysis. (NCT04476030)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + Assigned ADT-9.0
SAGE-217 + Assigned ADT-9.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at Day 15

The MADRS is a 10-item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in participants with mood disorders. The MADRS total score was calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores. Each item yields a score of 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The total MADRS score (sum of all individual items) ranges from 0 (symptoms absent) to 60 (severe depression). Higher MADRS scores indicated more severe depression. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM analysis. (NCT04476030)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 15

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + Assigned ADT-15.9
SAGE-217 + Assigned ADT-17.2

[back to top]