Page last updated: 2024-12-10

goserelin

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Goserelin: A synthetic long-acting agonist of GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE. Goserelin is used in treatments of malignant NEOPLASMS of the prostate, uterine fibromas, and metastatic breast cancer. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID5311128
CHEMBL ID1201247
CHEBI ID5523
SCHEMBL ID8643
SCHEMBL ID19712239
SCHEMBL ID20459194
MeSH IDM0026217

Synonyms (57)

Synonym
AB01275466-01
decapeptide i
ici-118630
zd-9393
goserelin [usan:inn:ban]
d-ser(t-bu)(sup 6)aza-gly(sup 10)-gnrh
goserelina [spanish]
1-(5-oxo-l-prolyl-l-histidyl-l-tryptophyl-l-seryl-l-tyrosyl-o-tert-butyl-d-seryl-l-leucyl-l-arginyl-l-prolyl)semicarbazide
goserelinum [latin]
ici 118630
gosereline [french]
goserelin (usan/inn)
65807-02-5
D04405
goserelin
DB00014
HMS2089D16
ici 118,630
CHEMBL1201247
AKOS015994653
unii-0f65r8p09n
goserelina
0f65r8p09n ,
goserelinum
gosereline
hsdb 7606
gtpl3879
HY-13673
SCHEMBL8643
HS-2015 ,
DTXSID7048297 ,
goserelin [who-dd]
goserelin [inn]
goserelin [usan]
goserelin [mart.]
goserelin [ep monograph]
goserelin [hsdb]
goserelin [mi]
AKOS030213245
CHEBI:5523
(d-ser(tbu)6,azagly10)-lhrh (free base)
mfcd00867894
SCHEMBL19712239
SCHEMBL20459194
1233494-97-7
Q1992653
goserelin-acetate
NCGC00390804-01
(s)-n-((6s,9s,12r,15s,18s,21s,24s)-21-((1h-indol-3-yl)methyl)-1-amino-12-(tert-butoxymethyl)-6-((s)-2-(2-carbamoylhydrazine-1-carbonyl)pyrrolidine-1-carbonyl)-15-(4-hydroxybenzyl)-18-(hydroxymethyl)-25-(1h-imidazol-4-yl)-1-imino-9-isobutyl-8,11,14,17,20,2
l02ae03
goserelin (ep monograph)
dtxcid2028272
goserelinum (latin)
goserelin (mart.)
6-(o-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-d-serine)-10-deglycinamide luteinizing hormone-releasing factor (pig) 2-(aminocarbonyl)hydrazide
(2s)-1-[(2s)-2-[(2s)-2-[(2r)-3-(tert-butoxy)-2-[(2s)-2-[(2s)-3-hydroxy-2-[(2s)-2-[(2s)-3-(1h-imidazol-4-yl)-2-{[(2s)-5-oxopyrrolidin-2-yl]formamido}propanamido]-3-(1h-indol-3-yl)propanamido]propanamido]-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propanamido]propanamido]-4-methyl
EN300-7480905

Research Excerpts

Overview

Goserelin acetate (Gos) is a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. It is commonly used in patients with prostate cancer, endometriosis, and precocious puberty. GOSErelin is a biodegradable, sustained-release 3.6 mg depot.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Goserelin acetate is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog that is commonly used in patients with prostate cancer, endometriosis, and precocious puberty. "( Erythema nodosum caused by goserelin acetate sustained-release: Case report and literature review.
Du, S; Ling, L; Liu, W; Meng, F; Peng, J; Su, R; Yan, W, 2023
)
2.65
"Goserelin acetate (Gos) is a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist, used in treatment of prostate cancer in which desired concentration of Gos in blood is maintained for longer duration. "( Nanoparticulate delivery of LHRH analogue for the treatment of prostate cancer.
Dixit, VK; Jain, N; Tomar, P,
)
1.57
"Goserelin acetate is a LH-RH agonist developed by AstraZeneca (formerly ICI, UK), and has been used clinically for the treatment of prostate cancer as a 4-week controlled-release formulation (Zoladex 3.6 mg depot). "( [A new LH-RH agonist for treatment of prostate cancer, 3-month controlled-release formulation of goserelin acetate (Zoladex LA 10.8 mg depot)--outline of pre-clinical and clinical studies].
Tsukagoshi, S, 2002
)
1.97
"Goserelin is a biodegradable, sustained-release 3.6 mg depot that is administered by subcutaneous injection every 28 days."( Goserelin ('Zoladex')--offering patients more choice in early breast cancer.
Mitchell, H, 2004
)
2.49
"Goserelin is an effective short-term treatment for mastalgia. "( European randomized, multicenter study of goserelin (Zoladex) in the management of mastalgia.
Gateley, C; Goyal, A; Kubista, E; Leinster, S; Maddox, PR; Mansel, RE; Preece, P; von Fournier, D, 2004
)
2.03
"Goserelin acetate is a member of this class, and 10 of 11 major Phase III trials demonstrating better outcomes with ADT and RT used goserelin acetate."( Goserelin acetate in combination with radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Izaguirre, A; Roach, M, 2007
)
2.5
"Goserelin is a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue which during long term administration reduces circulating levels of gonadotrophins (luteinising hormone and follicle stimulating hormone) and sex hormones. "( Goserelin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in prostate cancer.
Brogden, RN; Faulds, D, 1995
)
3.18
"Goserelin is a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue that induces the suppression of gonadal steroidogenesis, and it could therefore be a medical alternative to irreversible surgical castration. "( Ovarian function suppression with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue goserelin in premenopausal advanced breast cancer.
Bajetta, E; Bono, A; Buzzoni, R; Celio, L; Ferrari, L; Galluzzo, D; Longhi, A; Zampino, MG; Zilembo, N, 1994
)
1.95
"Goserelin acetate is a synthetic GnRH agonist suitable for safe and effective therapy of pelvic endometriosis. "( [Treatment of pelvic endometriosis with goserelin, an LHRH agonist].
Crha, I; Mlyncek, M; Müller, P; Ventruba, P, 1996
)
2
"Goserelin is a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue which, during continuous administration, down-regulates the pituitary-ovarian gonadal axis and reduces levels of the gonadotrophins, luteinising hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone. "( Goserelin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in benign gynaecological disorders.
Brogden, RN; Perry, CM, 1996
)
3.18
"Goserelin is a synthetic decapeptide analogue of luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH). "( Clinical pharmacokinetics of goserelin.
Cockshott, ID, 2000
)
2.04
"Goserelin is an important drug with recognized therapeutical application for palliative treatment of prostatic and breast carcinomas."( Liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry of multicomponent peptide mixtures. Characterization of a mixture from the synthesis of the hormone goserelin.
Barbosa, J; Benavente, F; Castillo, A; Sanz-Nebot, V, 2000
)
1.23
"Goserelin is a synthetic analogue of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) [luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH); or gonadorelin] which stimulates gonadotrophin and sex hormone release in the short term, and then causes suppression with continued administration. "( Goserelin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and clinical use in sex hormone-related conditions.
Chrisp, P; Goa, KL, 1991
)
3.17

Effects

Goserelin has better injection site safety, single-step delivery, and an efficient administration schedule compared with degarelix. It also has maximum benefit in prostate-specific antigen suppression.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Goserelin also has maximum benefit in prostate-specific antigen suppression."( Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in prostate cancer: A comparative review of efficacy and safety.
Addla, S; Jain, M; Patil, K; Raja, T; Sarkar, KK; Sridhar, PS; Sud, R; Talreja, V, 2022
)
1.44
"Goserelin has better injection site safety, single-step delivery, and an efficient administration schedule compared with degarelix, which has significantly higher injection site reactions and less efficient administration mechanism."( A review of clinical evidence to assess differences in efficacy and safety of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist (goserelin) and LHRH antagonist (degarelix).
Bahl, A; Bakshi, G; Murthy, V; Patil, K; Rajappa, S; Rawal, S, 2022
)
1.65

Actions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Goserelin achieves lower PSA, improved time to progression, and better survival outcomes when administered adjunctively to radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone, with significant results even over long-term follow-up."( A review of clinical evidence to assess differences in efficacy and safety of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist (goserelin) and LHRH antagonist (degarelix).
Bahl, A; Bakshi, G; Murthy, V; Patil, K; Rajappa, S; Rawal, S, 2022
)
1.65

Treatment

Goserelin treatment decreased circulating levels of oestradiol and progesterone. Treatment with goserelin and tamoxifen led to a 90% fall in the mean follicle-stimulating hormone.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Goserelin and CDDP cotreatment decreased the estrus cycles of the nude mice and prolonged estrus duration."( Goserelin can inhibit ovarian cancer proliferation and simultaneously protect ovarian function from cisplatin: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Ding, JX; Feng, WW; Hua, KQ; Lu, ZY; Tao, X; Wang, JJ; Zhang, Y, 2013
)
2.55
"Goserelin treatment and bicalutamide treatment mostly affected the expression of different miRNAs. "( Goserelin and bicalutamide treatments alter the expression of microRNAs in the prostate.
Erkkilä, T; Jalava, S; Kaipia, A; Kujala, P; Lähdesmäki, H; Lehmusvaara, S; Seppälä, J; Tammela, TL; Urbanucci, A; Visakorpi, T, 2013
)
3.28
"Goserelin treatment decreased circulating levels of oestradiol and progesterone and reduced the size of mammary tumours; all the animals showed objective response (OR) to treatment after 3 months, and the relapse-free survival after 2 years was 88%."( Ovarian function suppression with a GnRH analogue: D-ser(But[t])[6]-Arzgly[10]-LHRH (Goserelin) in hormone dependent canine mammary cancer.
Avallone, L; Crispino, A; Florio, S; Lombardi, P; Pagnini, U, 1999
)
1.25
"The goserelin-treated group also reported local symptoms at the injection site."( A comparative study of the acceptability and effect of goserelin and nafarelin on endometriosis.
Bergqvist, A, 2000
)
1.04
"Treatment with goserelin and exemestane produced a significant reduction in her tumor load and a correction of her hypocalcemia, which was initially refractory to treatment."( Metastatic breast carcinoma presenting with profound hypocalcemia.
Banerjee, M; Cooksley, T; Younis, N, 2010
)
0.7
"Treatment with goserelin and tamoxifen led to a 90% fall in the mean follicle-stimulating hormone (P<0.001)."( Clinical and endocrine data for goserelin plus anastrozole as second-line endocrine therapy for premenopausal advanced breast cancer.
Cheung, KL; Forward, DP; Jackson, L; Robertson, JF, 2004
)
0.95
"Treatment with goserelin induced amenorrhoea in over 80% of the women, and this was associated with a significant rise in haemoglobin level. "( Treatment with the gonadotrophin releasing hormone-agonist goserelin before hysterectomy for uterine fibroids.
Baird, DT; Coutts, J; Hillier, H; Lumsden, MA; Thomas, E; Thomas, N; West, CP, 1994
)
0.88
"The treatment with Goserelin depot resulted in a complete remission of the symptoms, occurring within the first month of treatment and still present after a median follow-up of 12 months, and in the normalization of the histological profile."( [Treatment of endometrial hyperplasia with Goserelin depot, an LH-RH analog].
Castagnola, D; Cherubini, F; Pozzi, M, 1993
)
0.87
"Treatment with goserelin resulted in early and more intense menopausal symptoms, while the effects of tamoxifen were slower and milder."( Randomized trial of adjuvant tamoxifen and/or goserelin in premenopausal breast cancer--self-rated physiological effects and symptoms.
Berglund, G; Bolund, C; Brandberg, Y; Fornander, T; Nystedt, M; Rutqvist, LE, 2000
)
0.9

Toxicity

The number of CV adverse events (AEs) for degarelix, buserelin, gose Relin, leuprorelin and triptorelin until September 2021 were recorded. Adverse drug reaction:rates of a adverse reactions were 21% (15/70) in Leuprolide acetate group and 20% (13/66) in Goserelin acetate Group.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"In this study we aimed to discuss whether the gonadal suppression is effective or not in preventing the gonadal toxic effects of some chemotherapeutics."( The effects of GnRH analogues and antiandrogenes in preventing the gonadotoxic effects of COPP chemotherapy.
Akay, AF; Bircan, MK; Deniz, M; Göçmen, M; Nergiz, Y; Sahin, H, 2001
)
0.31
"As a conclusion we think that gonadal suppression applied during chemotherapy regimen could decrease the testicular toxic effects of chemotherapeutic but more clinical investigations needed for routine application."( The effects of GnRH analogues and antiandrogenes in preventing the gonadotoxic effects of COPP chemotherapy.
Akay, AF; Bircan, MK; Deniz, M; Göçmen, M; Nergiz, Y; Sahin, H, 2001
)
0.31
"The add-back therapy that consists of an estradiol patch and oral medroxyprogesterone acetate is effective and safe treatment for endometriosis."( [Effects and safety of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist combined with estradiol patch and oral medroxyprogesterone acetate on endometriosis].
Chen, X; Hu, WG; Hua, KQ; Wang, YQ; Zhang, SF; Zhu, J, 2009
)
0.35
" Therefore, it is a safe and effective treatment."( [Clinical efficacy and safety of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist combined with estrogen-dydrogesteronea in treatment of endometriosis].
Chen, H; Han, Y; Hu, WG; Hua, KQ; Li, XL; Long, QQ; Zhang, SF, 2010
)
0.36
" Serum testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and adverse events were recorded at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24."( Comparison of efficacy and safety of 1- and 3-month luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist depots as initial therapies for prostate cancer.
Inoue, Y; Ishizuka, O; Kiyokawa, H; Kobayashi, S; Mizusawa, H; Nakagawa, T; Nishizawa, O; Nishizawa, S; Satoh, T; Wajiki, M, 2013
)
0.39
" Three patients in the Direct Group experienced adverse events that were attributed to the co-administered bicalutamide."( Comparison of efficacy and safety of 1- and 3-month luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist depots as initial therapies for prostate cancer.
Inoue, Y; Ishizuka, O; Kiyokawa, H; Kobayashi, S; Mizusawa, H; Nakagawa, T; Nishizawa, O; Nishizawa, S; Satoh, T; Wajiki, M, 2013
)
0.39
" Patients must be monitored for adverse events associated with bicalutamide."( Comparison of efficacy and safety of 1- and 3-month luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist depots as initial therapies for prostate cancer.
Inoue, Y; Ishizuka, O; Kiyokawa, H; Kobayashi, S; Mizusawa, H; Nakagawa, T; Nishizawa, O; Nishizawa, S; Satoh, T; Wajiki, M, 2013
)
0.39
"Intermittent dosing may reduce the adverse events (AEs) of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT)."( Advanced prostate cancer treated with intermittent or continuous androgen deprivation in the randomised FinnProstate Study VII: quality of life and adverse effects.
Ala-Opas, M; Lundstedt, S; Salonen, AJ; Taari, K; Tammela, TL; Viitanen, J, 2013
)
0.39
" AEs and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were analysed by the chi-square test."( Advanced prostate cancer treated with intermittent or continuous androgen deprivation in the randomised FinnProstate Study VII: quality of life and adverse effects.
Ala-Opas, M; Lundstedt, S; Salonen, AJ; Taari, K; Tammela, TL; Viitanen, J, 2013
)
0.39
"To study, adverse effects, quality of life (QoL), fatigue, and mental distress when intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with androgen deprivation was applied to the whole pelvis as management of men with locally advanced prostate cancer."( Intensity-modulated radiotherapy to the pelvis and androgen deprivation in men with locally advanced prostate cancer: a study of adverse effects and their relation to quality of life.
Dahl, AA; Lilleby, W; Stensvold, A, 2013
)
0.39
" The patients completed a questionnaire with well-established instruments for adverse effects on urinary, bowel, and sexual function and bother, QoL, fatigue, and mental distress before treatment, and at 3 and 12 months follow-up."( Intensity-modulated radiotherapy to the pelvis and androgen deprivation in men with locally advanced prostate cancer: a study of adverse effects and their relation to quality of life.
Dahl, AA; Lilleby, W; Stensvold, A, 2013
)
0.39
" The efficacy, pregnancy rate and adverse reactions were compared among the three groups."( [Clinical study on the effectiveness and safety of combined laparoscopy and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in the treatment of endometriosis].
Li, B; Lu, H; Song, JH; Zhang, J, 2013
)
0.39
" (4) Adverse drug reaction:rates of a adverse reactions were 21% (15/70) in Leuprolide acetate group and 20% (13/66) in Goserelin acetate group, including irregular vaginal bleeding associated with low estrogen level."( [Clinical study on the effectiveness and safety of combined laparoscopy and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in the treatment of endometriosis].
Li, B; Lu, H; Song, JH; Zhang, J, 2013
)
0.6
"Compared with laparoscopy alone, laparoscopy combined with GnRH-a is more effective in treatment of, which exhibit lower recurrence rate, higher pregnancy rate and fewer adverse reactions."( [Clinical study on the effectiveness and safety of combined laparoscopy and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in the treatment of endometriosis].
Li, B; Lu, H; Song, JH; Zhang, J, 2013
)
0.39
" Liver and renal functions, lipid profile, serum sex hormone levels and endometrial thickness were measured, and the frequency of adverse events in Kuntai and Tibolone groups was recorded."( Efficacy and safety investigation of Kuntai capsule for the add-back therapy of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist administration to endometriosis patients: a randomized, double-blind, blank- and tibolone-controlled study.
Chen, JM; Ding, Y; Gao, HY; Jiang, GH; Li, Q; Wang, Q; Yuan, X, 2015
)
0.42
"Addition of abiraterone to LHRHa with radiation is safe and achieves effective prostatic androgen suppression."( External beam radiation therapy and abiraterone in men with localized prostate cancer: safety and effect on tissue androgens.
Cho, E; Dalkin, BL; Konodi, MA; Kurland, BF; Liao, JJ; Marck, BT; Matsumoto, AM; Montgomery, RB; Mostaghel, EA; Russell, KJ, 2015
)
0.42
" Laboratory values, adverse events (AEs) and local tolerability were assessed throughout the study period."( Phase I, two-way, crossover study to demonstrate bioequivalence and to compare safety and tolerability of single-dose XM17 vs Gonal-f® in healthy women after follicle-stimulating hormone downregulation.
Bias, P; Lammerich, A; Mueller, A, 2015
)
0.42
" The most common adverse events in the degarelix group were injection site reactions."( Efficacy and safety of 3-month dosing regimen of degarelix in Japanese subjects with prostate cancer: A phase III study.
Akaza, H; Akazawa, R; Fukasawa, S; Horie, S; Kusuoka, H; Naito, S; Ohashi, Y; Ozono, S; Saito, M; Tsukamoto, T; Uemura, H; Yokomizo, Y, 2018
)
0.48
" The frequency and severity of adverse events (hot flushes, fatigue, sexual dysfunction) are comparable among the GnRH-A."( Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in prostate cancer: A comparative review of efficacy and safety.
Addla, S; Jain, M; Patil, K; Raja, T; Sarkar, KK; Sridhar, PS; Sud, R; Talreja, V, 2022
)
0.72
"We gathered cases diagnosed with prostate cancer based on the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from 2004 to 2020."( Analysis of adverse event of interstitial lung disease in men with prostate cancer receiving hormone therapy using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
Chen, C; Li, J; Shen, P; Wu, B; Wu, F; Xu, T; Yin, X; Yu, L, 2023
)
0.91
" These drugs are at increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) adverse events (AEs)."( Cardiovascular adverse events-related to GnRH agonists and GnRH antagonists: analysis of real-life data from Eudra-Vigilance and Food and Drug Administration databases entries.
Cicione, A; De Nunzio, C; Franco, A; Gravina, C; Grimaldi, MC; Guercio, A; Lombardo, R; Nacchia, A; Tema, G; Tubaro, A, 2023
)
0.91
"EV and FDA databases were queried and the number of CV adverse events (AEs) for degarelix, buserelin, goserelin, leuprorelin, triptorelin until September 2021 were recorded."( Cardiovascular adverse events-related to GnRH agonists and GnRH antagonists: analysis of real-life data from Eudra-Vigilance and Food and Drug Administration databases entries.
Cicione, A; De Nunzio, C; Franco, A; Gravina, C; Grimaldi, MC; Guercio, A; Lombardo, R; Nacchia, A; Tema, G; Tubaro, A, 2023
)
1.13

Pharmacokinetics

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Six of these patients also received a 250-microgram SC bolus of ICI 118630, for pharmacokinetic studies, before starting the infusion or the depot."( Pharmacokinetic and endocrinological parameters of a slow-release depot preparation of the GnRH analogue ICI 118630 (zoladex) compared with a subcutaneous bolus and continuous subcutaneous infusion of the same drug in patients with prostatic cancer.
Arkell, DG; Bailey, LC; Blackledge, G; Clayton, RN; Cottam, J; Farrar, D; Holder, G; Lynch, SS; Perren, TJ; Young, CH, 1986
)
0.27
" After a rapid distribution phase with an initial half-life of 1 hour, both recombinant human LH and urinary human LH were eliminated with a terminal half-life of 10-12 hours."( Clinical pharmacology of recombinant human luteinizing hormone: Part I. Pharmacokinetics after intravenous administration to healthy female volunteers and comparison with urinary human luteinizing hormone.
Beltrami, V; le Cotonnec, JY; Munafo, A; Porchet, HC, 1998
)
0.3
"To assess the pharmacokinetics of a recombinant human LH preparation and its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between recombinant human luteinizing hormone and recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone.
Beltrami, V; le Cotonnec, JY; Loumaye, E; Munafo, A; Porchet, HC, 1998
)
0.3
"No pharmacokinetic interaction between recombinant human LH and FSH was observed, with no significant difference in baseline-corrected maximal observed concentration over baseline, area under the concentration-time curve from t = 0 to t = 24 hours, or time to maximal concentration after single doses alone or in combination."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between recombinant human luteinizing hormone and recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone.
Beltrami, V; le Cotonnec, JY; Loumaye, E; Munafo, A; Porchet, HC, 1998
)
0.3
"A new recombinant human LH preparation has a low accumulation ratio at steady-state and no pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions with recombinant human FSH."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between recombinant human luteinizing hormone and recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone.
Beltrami, V; le Cotonnec, JY; Loumaye, E; Munafo, A; Porchet, HC, 1998
)
0.3
" Pharmacokinetic data have been generated using a specific radioimmunoassay."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of goserelin.
Cockshott, ID, 2000
)
0.6
" According to this method, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data were obtained from a single plasma sample aliquot."( An LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of goserelin and testosterone in rat plasma for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies.
Di, X; Han, J; Leng, G; Li, Y; Liu, W; Sha, C; Zhang, S; Zhang, X, 2014
)
0.65

Compound-Compound Interactions

This research was to investigate the role of goserelin in combination with endocrine therapy for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in premenopausal women positive for hormone receptors. The RP2D of alpelisib and buparlisib in combination were 350 mg and 100 mg, respectively.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"We studied the effects of hormonal manipulation by orchiectomy, alone or in combination with the aromatase inhibitor aminoglutethimide (AGT), and by luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LH-RH-A) (goserelin) treatment on the development of early putative (pre)neoplastic lesions induced in the pancreas of rats and hamsters by azaserine and N-nitrosobis(2-oxopropyl)amine respectively."( Effects of castration, alone and in combination with aminoglutethimide, on growth of (pre)neoplastic lesions in exocrine pancreas of rats and hamsters.
Bakker, GH; de Jong, FH; Foekens, JA; Klijn, JG; Meijers, M; van Garderen-Hoetmer, A; Woutersen, RA, 1991
)
0.47
"To compare the efficacy and safety of bicalutamide and flutamide, each used in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing analogue (LHRH-A) therapy, in patients with untreated metastatic (Stage D2) prostate cancer."( A controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy, in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Casodex Combination Study Group.
Block, N; Jones, J; Kolvenbag, G; Patterson, AL; Sarosdy, M; Schellhammer, P; Sharifi, R; Soloway, M; Venner, P; Vogelzang, N, 1995
)
0.29
"6 mg/month combined with continuous oestradiol valerate 1 mg daily and medroxyprogesterone acetate 5 mg daily."( An alternative to hysterectomy? GnRH analogue combined with hormone replacement therapy.
Beard, RW; Cooper, S; Gangar, KF; Rae, T; Rogers, V; Saunders, D; Stones, RW, 1993
)
0.29
"To review the outcome of therapy with maximal androgen blockade and compare the efficacy and safety of bicalutamide and flutamide, each used in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LHRH-A) therapy, in patients with untreated metastatic (Stage D2) prostate cancer."( Maximal androgen blockade for patients with metastatic prostate cancer: outcome of a controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy. Casodex Combination Study Group.
Block, N; Jones, J; Kolvenbag, G; Patterson, AL; Sarosdy, M; Schellhammer, P; Sharifi, R; Soloway, M; Venner, P; Vogelzang, N, 1996
)
0.29
" Because of its efficacy and tolerability profile, together with its convenient once-daily dosing formulation, bicalutamide represents a prime candidate for antiandrogen of first choice in combination with LHRH-A therapy in the treatment of men with metastatic prostate cancer."( Maximal androgen blockade for patients with metastatic prostate cancer: outcome of a controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy. Casodex Combination Study Group.
Block, N; Jones, J; Kolvenbag, G; Patterson, AL; Sarosdy, M; Schellhammer, P; Sharifi, R; Soloway, M; Venner, P; Vogelzang, N, 1996
)
0.29
"A randomized, multicenter trial, double-blind for antiandrogen therapy, compared the antiandrogens bicalutamide and flutamide, each combined with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy (LHRH-A) in 813 patients with Stage D2 prostate carcinoma."( A controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy, in patients with advanced prostate carcinoma. Analysis of time to progression. CASODEX Combination Study Group.
Block, NL; Chen, Y; Kolvenbag, GJ; Patterson, AL; Sarosdy, MF; Schellhammer, PF; Sharifi, R; Soloway, MS; Venner, PM; Vogelzang, NJ, 1996
)
0.29
" The degree of tumour regression then allowed a consecutive macroscopic radical tumour resection followed by an additional 6 months of no evidence of disease while the same drug combination was continued."( Octreotide combined with goserelin in the therapy of advanced pancreatic cancer--results of a pilot study and review of the literature.
Baur, M; Dittrich, C; Fazeny, B; Grunt, T; Huber, H; Hudec, M; Kremnitzer, M; Meryn, S; Prohaska, M; Tuchmann, A, 1997
)
0.6
"To assess the pathological staging and biochemical progression-free survival (assessed using serum prostate-specific antigen level) of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP)."( Pathological staging and biochemical recurrence after neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy in combination with radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: results of a phase II study.
Begg, CB; Cookson, MS; Dalbagni, G; Fair, WR; Herr, H; Reuter, VE; Russo, P; Sheinfeld, J; Sogani, PC, 1997
)
0.3
"A 44-year-old premenopausal woman having local recurrence and pleural and bone metastases of breast cancer was treated with aromatization inhibition in combination with Luteinizing Hormone-releasing Hormone (LH-RH) agonist."( [A case of a premenopausal woman with advanced breast cancer treated with aromatization inhibition in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist].
Akiyama, H; Hisamatsu, K; Iwamori, S; Minami, K; Ota, K; Tanabe, K, 1997
)
0.3
" This technique has been used most commonly to treat prostate cancers in combination with hormonal therapy."( Rotational 3D-conformal radiation therapy (conformation therapy) combined with hormone therapy for the treatment of stage B2/C prostate cancer in Japanese men.
Igaki, H; Kaizu, T; Karasawa, K; Matsuda, T; Niibe, Y; Shinohara, M; Tanaka, Y, 2003
)
0.32
"Rotational 3D-conformal radiation therapy combined with hormone therapy might be promising for the treatment of prostate cancer."( Rotational 3D-conformal radiation therapy (conformation therapy) combined with hormone therapy for the treatment of stage B2/C prostate cancer in Japanese men.
Igaki, H; Kaizu, T; Karasawa, K; Matsuda, T; Niibe, Y; Shinohara, M; Tanaka, Y, 2003
)
0.32
"205 patients with previously untreated stage C/D prostate cancer were randomized (1:1) to receive once-daily bicalutamide 80 mg or placebo, each combined with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist."( Superior anti-tumor efficacy of bicalutamide 80 mg in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist versus LHRH agonist monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced prostate cancer: interim results of a randomized study in Ja
Akaza, H; Arai, Y; Igawa, M; Kanetake, H; Kumon, H; Matsuda, T; Naito, S; Ohashi, Y; Soeda, A; Usami, M; Yamaguchi, A, 2004
)
0.32
"In Japanese patients with advanced prostate cancer, first-line treatment with bicalutamide 80 mg in combination with an LHRH agonist is superior to LHRH agonist monotherapy in terms of the antitumor response at 12 weeks, and also time to treatment failure and progression, and does not compromise treatment safety."( Superior anti-tumor efficacy of bicalutamide 80 mg in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist versus LHRH agonist monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced prostate cancer: interim results of a randomized study in Ja
Akaza, H; Arai, Y; Igawa, M; Kanetake, H; Kumon, H; Matsuda, T; Naito, S; Ohashi, Y; Soeda, A; Usami, M; Yamaguchi, A, 2004
)
0.32
"Improvements in longer-term survival rates have been demonstrated for locally advanced prostate cancer patients treated with adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and in subsets of men with clinically localized disease treated with ADT combined with external-beam radiotherapy (RT)."( Goserelin acetate in combination with radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Izaguirre, A; Roach, M, 2007
)
1.78
"To study whether use of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (N-ADT) combined with whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) for high-risk prostate cancer patients was associated with survival benefit over prostate radiotherapy (PORT) only."( Benefit of whole pelvic radiotherapy combined with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation for the high-risk prostate cancer.
Antczak, A; Baczyk, M; Kwias, Z; Martenka, P; Milecki, P; Skowronek, J, 2009
)
0.35
"Between 1999 and 2004, 162 high-risk prostate cancer patients were treated with radiotherapy combined with long-term androgen deprivation therapy (L-ADT)."( Benefit of whole pelvic radiotherapy combined with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation for the high-risk prostate cancer.
Antczak, A; Baczyk, M; Kwias, Z; Martenka, P; Milecki, P; Skowronek, J, 2009
)
0.35
"The WPRT combined with N-ADT compared to PORT for high-risk patients resulted in improvement in CSS and bPFS; however no OS benefit was observed."( Benefit of whole pelvic radiotherapy combined with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation for the high-risk prostate cancer.
Antczak, A; Baczyk, M; Kwias, Z; Martenka, P; Milecki, P; Skowronek, J, 2009
)
0.35
"To evaluate effects and safety of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) combined with transdermal estradiol and medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of endometriosis."( [Effects and safety of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist combined with estradiol patch and oral medroxyprogesterone acetate on endometriosis].
Chen, X; Hu, WG; Hua, KQ; Wang, YQ; Zhang, SF; Zhu, J, 2009
)
0.35
"To compare clinical effect of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) alone and GnRH-a combined with low-dose dydrogesteronea and estradiol valerate on sex hormone, hypoestrogenic symptoms, quality of life and bone mineral density (BMD) in treatment of endometriosis."( [Clinical efficacy and safety of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist combined with estrogen-dydrogesteronea in treatment of endometriosis].
Chen, H; Han, Y; Hu, WG; Hua, KQ; Li, XL; Long, QQ; Zhang, SF, 2010
)
0.36
"GnRH-a combined with estrogen-progesterone regimen could relieve pain from endometriosis as effectively as GnRH-a alone and reduce hypoestrogenic symptoms and bone loss."( [Clinical efficacy and safety of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist combined with estrogen-dydrogesteronea in treatment of endometriosis].
Chen, H; Han, Y; Hu, WG; Hua, KQ; Li, XL; Long, QQ; Zhang, SF, 2010
)
0.36
"The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Zoladex combined with CEF chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy in hormone-responsive, premenopausal, operable breast cancer."( A Phase II trial of Zoladex combined with CEF chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy in premenopausal women with hormone-responsive, operable breast cancer.
Cui, S; Liu, J; Qin, L; Zhang, C; Zhang, J; Zhang, S, 2012
)
0.38
"It was suggested that conservative laparoscopic surgery combined with goserelin in treatment of stage III or IV ovarian endometriosis could reduce the recurrence risk of severe ovarian endometriosis and improve the pregnant rate of endometriosis-associated infertility."( [Efficacy of conservative laparoscopic surgery combined with goserelin in treatment of 206 patients with severe ovarian endometriosis at short-term and long-term follow-up].
Ge, CX; Tang, XQ; Zhu, XH, 2012
)
0.85
"This research was to investigate the role of goserelin in combination with endocrine therapy for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in premenopausal women positive for hormone receptors."( Role of goserelin in combination with endocrine therapy for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in premenopausal women positive for hormone receptor: a retrospective matched case-control study.
Guan, X; He, Z; Li, F; Li, Q; Lin, H; Sun, J; Wu, S; Zhu, Y, 2013
)
1.08
"We retrospectively analyzed 40 patients as the treatment group with advanced breast cancer who, were positive for hormone receptors, received goserelin in combination with endocrine therapy and 40 patients as the control group received endocrine therapy alone, matched for age, gender, receptor status, and tumor stage."( Role of goserelin in combination with endocrine therapy for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in premenopausal women positive for hormone receptor: a retrospective matched case-control study.
Guan, X; He, Z; Li, F; Li, Q; Lin, H; Sun, J; Wu, S; Zhu, Y, 2013
)
1.03
"The role of aromatase inhibitors combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog in metastatic male breast cancer patients remains unknown."( Letrozole combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog for metastatic male breast cancer.
Barba, M; Del Medico, P; Di Lauro, L; Giannarelli, D; Laudadio, L; Maugeri-Saccà, M; Pizzuti, L; Sergi, D; Tomao, S; Vici, P, 2013
)
0.39
"The aim of this study was to evaluate acute adverse events and efficacy of three-dimensional intensity- modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with endocrine therapy for intermediate and advanced prostate cancer."( Intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with endocrine therapy for intermediate and advanced prostate cancer: long-term outcome of Chinese patients.
Cheng, HH; Fu, ZC; Li, DS; Lin, GS; Luo, HC, 2013
)
0.39
"Sixty-seven patients were treated with three-dimensional IMRT combined with maximum androgen blockade."( Intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with endocrine therapy for intermediate and advanced prostate cancer: long-term outcome of Chinese patients.
Cheng, HH; Fu, ZC; Li, DS; Lin, GS; Luo, HC, 2013
)
0.39
"IMRT combined with endocrine therapy demonstrated promising efficacy and was well tolerated in patients with intermediate and advanced prostate cancer."( Intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with endocrine therapy for intermediate and advanced prostate cancer: long-term outcome of Chinese patients.
Cheng, HH; Fu, ZC; Li, DS; Lin, GS; Luo, HC, 2013
)
0.39
" The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in health-related QOL in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy."( Long-term quality of life outcomes in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer after intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with androgen deprivation.
Cheng, HH; Cheng, LP; Fu, ZC; Li, DS; Liao, SG; Lin, GS; Luo, HC; Xu, JF; Yin, Q; Yu, QY; Zheng, WF; Zhu, JF, 2014
)
0.4
" For patients with locally advanced prostate cancer with a high Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, a Gleason score of >8 points, prostate-specific antigen levels of >20 ng/mL, and high education, attention should be paid to the interference of fatigue with quality of life, especially general level of activity, ability to concentrate, and mood, after radiotherapy combined with hormonal therapy."( Long-term cancer-related fatigue outcomes in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer after intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with hormonal therapy.
Chen, QH; Cheng, HH; Feng, J; Fu, ZC; Lei, Y; Liao, SG; Lin, GS; Luo, HC; Wang, D; Xu, JF; Yin, Q; Zhu, JF, 2016
)
0.43
"This is a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled study that will compare the efficacy and safety of degarelix with those of existing GnRH agonists combined with (125)I-TPPB."( A comparative study on the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist in neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy combined with transperineal prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.
Aoki, M; Egawa, S; Kido, M; Miki, K; Sasaki, H; Takahashi, H, 2016
)
0.43
"The efficacy and safety of palbociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, combined with fulvestrant and goserelin was assessed in premenopausal women with advanced breast cancer (ABC) who had progressed on prior endocrine therapy (ET)."( Palbociclib Combined with Fulvestrant in Premenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer and Prior Progression on Endocrine Therapy: PALOMA-3 Results.
André, F; Bartlett, CH; Cristofanilli, M; Dowsett, M; Folkerd, E; Harbeck, N; Hoffman, J; Im, SA; Iwata, H; Loi, S; Loibl, S; Masuda, N; Puyana Theall, K; Ro, J; Turner, NC; Verma, S; Zhang, K, 2017
)
0.67
" Potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and ovarian suppression with goserelin were assessed via plasma pharmacokinetics and biochemical analyses, respectively."( Palbociclib Combined with Fulvestrant in Premenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer and Prior Progression on Endocrine Therapy: PALOMA-3 Results.
André, F; Bartlett, CH; Cristofanilli, M; Dowsett, M; Folkerd, E; Harbeck, N; Hoffman, J; Im, SA; Iwata, H; Loi, S; Loibl, S; Masuda, N; Puyana Theall, K; Ro, J; Turner, NC; Verma, S; Zhang, K, 2017
)
0.69
"Palbociclib combined with fulvestrant and goserelin was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for premenopausal women with prior endocrine-resistant HR+/HER2- ABC."( Palbociclib Combined with Fulvestrant in Premenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer and Prior Progression on Endocrine Therapy: PALOMA-3 Results.
André, F; Bartlett, CH; Cristofanilli, M; Dowsett, M; Folkerd, E; Harbeck, N; Hoffman, J; Im, SA; Iwata, H; Loi, S; Loibl, S; Masuda, N; Puyana Theall, K; Ro, J; Turner, NC; Verma, S; Zhang, K, 2017
)
0.72
"PALOMA-3, the first registrational study to include premenopausal women in a trial investigating a CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with endocrine therapy, has the largest premenopausal cohort reported in an endocrine-resistant setting."( Palbociclib Combined with Fulvestrant in Premenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer and Prior Progression on Endocrine Therapy: PALOMA-3 Results.
André, F; Bartlett, CH; Cristofanilli, M; Dowsett, M; Folkerd, E; Harbeck, N; Hoffman, J; Im, SA; Iwata, H; Loi, S; Loibl, S; Masuda, N; Puyana Theall, K; Ro, J; Turner, NC; Verma, S; Zhang, K, 2017
)
0.46
" The use of HIFU in combination with androgen deprivation was associated with a decrease in numerical density of microvessels in zones of tumor and non-tumor parenchyma in patients with relapses."( Status of the Microcirculatory Network as a Factor of Prognosis and Evaluation of Therapeutic Efficiency in Prostate Cancer Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound in Combination with Androgen Deprivation.
Abdullaev, NA; Bakarev, MA; Kachesov, IV; Levin, VP; Neimark, AI, 2018
)
0.48
" The RP2D of alpelisib and buparlisib in combination with tamoxifen and goserelin were 350 mg and 100 mg, respectively."( A Phase Ib Study of Alpelisib or Buparlisib Combined with Tamoxifen Plus Goserelin in Premenopausal Women with HR-Positive HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer.
Chang, YC; Chao, TY; Chen, SC; Chitapanarux, I; Gao, M; Jung, KH; Kim, JH; Lee, KS; Liu, CT; Lu, YS; Park, YH; Shotelersuk, K; Slader, C; Sohn, J; Tseng, LM; Valenti, R; Yang, Y, 2021
)
1.09

Dosage Studied

8-mg goserelin-acetate depot provided a dosing schedule that was convenient for the patient and the physician. It has the potential to reduce health care costs while maintaining the quality of life in patients being treated for advanced prostate cancer.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" The sustained-release dosage form contains goserelin acetate dispersed in a biodegradable copolymer matrix and is designed to release active drug over 28 days."( Goserelin acetate implant: a depot luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog for advanced prostate cancer.
Goldspiel, BR; Kohler, DR,
)
1.84
" No dose-response relationship was found for either compound with respect to LH release, but ICI 118630 appeared more potent than LH-RH."( Comparison of mammalian luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH), and of an analog (ICI 118630), on luteinizing hormone and ovarian steroid (progesterone, oestradiol) secretions in laying hens. (Gallus domesticus).
Guémené, D; Williams, JB, 1986
)
0.27
"53 ng/ml and were not significantly different among the three dosage forms."( Zoladex (ICI 118,630): clinical trial of new luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog in metastatic prostatic carcinoma.
Chin, JL; deHaan, HA; Greco, JM; Huben, RP; Murphy, GP; Scott, M, 1987
)
0.27
" The presence of LHRH (10(-9) - 10(-7) M) in the culture medium inhibited these responses by right-shifting the dose-response curves."( Modulation of FSH-controlled steroidogenesis in rat granulosa cells: direct in-vitro effects of LHRH and ICI-118630.
Hillier, SG; Reichert, LE; van Hall, EV, 1981
)
0.26
"Although a dosage of 50 mg of bicalutamide once daily was not as effective as castration, the favorable quality of life outcomes and the low incidence of nonhormonal adverse events provide reasons to evaluate bicalutamide, as a single therapeutic agent, at higher doses."( Single-agent therapy with bicalutamide: a comparison with medical or surgical castration in the treatment of advanced prostate carcinoma.
Block, NL; Chodak, G; Kasimis, B; Kennealey, GT; Macramalla, E; Sharifi, R, 1995
)
0.29
" Long-term ECT completely blocked the rise in luteinizing hormone and testosterone level, but ECT at this dosage was likely to cause complications."( Estramustine phosphate for preventing flare-up in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue depot therapy.
Jinbo, H; Satoh, J; Shibata, Y; Shimizu, TS; Yamanaka, H, 1995
)
0.29
"00 years), mean total dosage of HMG (61."( Pituitary down-regulation prior to in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a comparison between a single dose of Zoladex depot and multiple daily doses of Suprefact.
Abdurazak, N; Cheng, WC; Lee, FY; Oyesanya, OA; Quah, E; Teo, SK, 1995
)
0.29
"6-mg depots will provide a more convenient dosing regime for both patient and doctor in this indication."( A randomised trial comparing the safety and efficacy of the Zoladex 10.8-mg depot, administered every 12 weeks, to that of the Zoladex 3.6-mg depot, administered every 4 weeks, in patients with advanced prostate cancer. The Dutch South East Cooperative Ur
Debruyne, FM; Dijkman, GA; Fernandez del Moral, P; Hoefakker, JW; Idema, JG; Plasman, JW; Sykes, M, 1995
)
0.29
" Constant administration of the GnRH agonist-induced ovulation in anestrous mares, but a dose-response relation was not observed."( Effect of constant administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist on reproductive activity in mares: induction of ovulation during seasonal anestrus.
Affleck, KJ; Fitzgerald, BP; Meyer, SL; Silvia, PJ, 1993
)
0.29
"We evaluated the efficacy of ovulation induction using purified FSH in either low dose or conventional dosage in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome."( Efficacy of low dose purified FSH in ovulation induction following pituitary desensitization in polycystic ovarian syndrome.
Anderson, DC; Buckler, HM; Cantrill, JA; Critchley, HO; Robertson, WR; Shalet, SM, 1993
)
0.29
" Because of its efficacy and tolerability profile, together with its convenient once-daily dosing formulation, bicalutamide represents a prime candidate for antiandrogen of first choice in combination with LHRH-A therapy in the treatment of men with metastatic prostate cancer."( Maximal androgen blockade for patients with metastatic prostate cancer: outcome of a controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy. Casodex Combination Study Group.
Block, N; Jones, J; Kolvenbag, G; Patterson, AL; Sarosdy, M; Schellhammer, P; Sharifi, R; Soloway, M; Venner, P; Vogelzang, N, 1996
)
0.29
"To compare the effectiveness of goserelin and danazol prior to endometrial laser ablation and assess different dosage regimens."( A comparison of goserelin and danazol as endometrial thinning agents prior to endometrial laser ablation.
Garry, R; Khair, A; Mooney, P; Stuart, M, 1996
)
0.92
"In 2 comparative studies 160 patients were randomized for dosing every 12 weeks using the 10."( A new long acting formulation of the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue goserelin: results of studies in prostate cancer.
Debruyne, FM; del Moral, F; Dijkman, GA; Heijbroek, RP; Hoefakker, JW; Idema, JG; Karthaus, HF; Khoe, GS; Kil, PJ; Kums, JJ; Lee, DC; Plasman, JW; Pull, HC; van der Mejden, AP; Witjes, WP, 1996
)
0.52
"8-mg goserelin-acetate depot provided a dosing schedule that was convenient for the patient and the physician, and it has the potential to reduce health care costs while maintaining the quality of life in patients being treated for advanced prostate cancer."( Three-month depot of goserelin acetate: clinical efficacy and endocrine profile. Dutch South East Cooperative Urological Group.
Debruyne, FM; Dijkman, GA; Fernandez del Moral, P; Kolvenbag, GJ; Witjes, WP, 1996
)
1.13
" Assuming that each modality is equally effective, emphasis should be placed on increasing patient tolerance and compliance by the use of long-acting, nontoxic treatments with simple dosing regimens and minimal side effects."( Androgen deprivation for prostatic carcinoma: a rationale for choosing components.
Chatelain, C; Fourcade, RO, 1998
)
0.3
" This resulted in improvement in respiratory symptoms, the absence of PEFR dips premenstrually, a reduction in maintenance prednisolone dosage and no further hospital admissions during a follow-up period of 14 months."( Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues: a novel treatment for premenstrual asthma.
Barber, PV; Murray, RD; New, JP; Shalet, SM, 1999
)
0.3
" Suramin was administered on a 78-day fixed dosing schedule (one cycle), and suramin treatment cycles were repeated every 6 months for a total of four cycles."( Androgen deprivation and four courses of fixed-schedule suramin treatment in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group Study.
Crawford, ED; Eisenberger, MA; Fisher, EI; Hussain, M; O'Connor, J; Petrylak, DP; Small, EJ; Wood, DP, 2000
)
0.31
"The study comprised 22 patients with prostate cancer prospectively enrolled in a control-crossover designed trial of dosing depot luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist based on serum testosterone."( Health related quality of life using serum testosterone as the trigger to re-dose long acting depot luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists in patients with prostate cancer.
Oefelein, M, 2003
)
0.32
" However, by study completion overall health related quality of life was equivalent regardless of the dosing method."( Health related quality of life using serum testosterone as the trigger to re-dose long acting depot luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists in patients with prostate cancer.
Oefelein, M, 2003
)
0.32
" The mean dosage of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) required for COH (2,354."( Comparison of clinical efficacy between a single administration of long-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and daily administrations of short-acting GnRHa in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles.
Cheon, KW; Choi, BC; Lee, HB; Lee, SC; Song, SJ; Yoo, KJ; Yu, SY, 2008
)
0.35
" The ratio of patients to whom dosing of LH-RH agonist was terminated who have a testosterone level of 50 ng/dl and lower was at 100% to month 7 and 7% to months 10 -19."( [Can serum testosterone level measurement extend the intervals of administration of a long-acting LHRH agonist ?].
Kawamura, K, 2010
)
0.36
"Intermittent dosing may reduce the adverse events (AEs) of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT)."( Advanced prostate cancer treated with intermittent or continuous androgen deprivation in the randomised FinnProstate Study VII: quality of life and adverse effects.
Ala-Opas, M; Lundstedt, S; Salonen, AJ; Taari, K; Tammela, TL; Viitanen, J, 2013
)
0.39
" Using a daily dosing regimen with lead-in, concurrent, and post-XRT therapy, the recommended phase 2 dose of sunitinib is 25 mg daily."( Sunitinib plus androgen deprivation and radiation therapy for patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer: results from a multi-institutional phase 1 study.
Corn, PG; DePetrillo, TA; Heath, E; Kuban, D; Maier, J; Mathew, P; Meyn, R; Song, DY, 2013
)
0.39
"6 mg dosing suppresses estradiol (E2) production and has proven efficacy in pre-menopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer."( Phase 3, open-label, randomized study comparing 3-monthly with monthly goserelin in pre-menopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.
Isidro, J; Itoh, Y; Jesena, A; Kim, HJ; Kim, KS; Lokejaroenlarb, S; Noguchi, S; Parmar, V; Sato, N; Shin, E; Wang, HC, 2016
)
0.67
"To characterize the dose-response relationships between gonadal steroid concentrations and measures regulated by gonadal steroids in older men."( Dose-Response Relationships Between Gonadal Steroids and Bone, Body Composition, and Sexual Function in Aging Men.
Burnett-Bowie, SM; Darakananda, K; Finkelstein, JS; Gentile, EC; Goldstein, DW; Krivicich, LM; Leder, BZ; Lee, H; Prizand, SH; Taylor, AP; Wulczyn, KE; Yu, EW, 2020
)
0.56
"Clear relationships between the testosterone dosage (or the resulting testosterone levels) and a variety of outcome measures were observed."( Dose-Response Relationships Between Gonadal Steroids and Bone, Body Composition, and Sexual Function in Aging Men.
Burnett-Bowie, SM; Darakananda, K; Finkelstein, JS; Gentile, EC; Goldstein, DW; Krivicich, LM; Leder, BZ; Lee, H; Prizand, SH; Taylor, AP; Wulczyn, KE; Yu, EW, 2020
)
0.56
"6 mg dosing and was non-inferior regarding safety and tolerability."( Clinical efficacy and safety of trimonthly administration of goserelin acetate 10.8 mg in premenopausal Chinese females with symptomatic adenomyosis: a prospective cohort study.
Jiao, X; Li, D; Li, H; Pan, Z; Ren, Q; Sun, H; Wang, G; Wang, L; Wang, X; Yan, S; Yang, L; Yuan, M; Zhang, S; Zhang, X, 2023
)
1.15
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Drug Classes (1)

ClassDescription
organic molecular entityAny molecular entity that contains carbon.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Bioassays (35)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (1,573)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-1990184 (11.70)18.7374
1990's529 (33.63)18.2507
2000's485 (30.83)29.6817
2010's331 (21.04)24.3611
2020's44 (2.80)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 72.24

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index72.24 (24.57)
Research Supply Index7.70 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.75 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index128.98 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (72.24)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials557 (33.61%)5.53%
Reviews164 (9.90%)6.00%
Case Studies201 (12.13%)4.05%
Observational3 (0.18%)0.25%
Other732 (44.18%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (269)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of LEE011 or Placebo in Combination With Tamoxifen and Goserelin or a Non-steroidal Aromatase Inhibitor (NSAI) and Goserelin for the Treatment of Premenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor Posi [NCT02278120]Phase 3672 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-20Completed
A Phase I Dose Escalation Trial of RO4929097 Administered in Combination With Exemestane in Pre- and Postmenopausal Patients With ER + Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT01149356]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Manufacturer discontinued drug development.)
A Phase Ib Dose Finding Study Assessing Safety and Activity of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB in Combination With Ribociclib and Fulvestrant in Participants With Estrogen Receptor Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Negative and Gastrin Releasing Peptide R [NCT05870579]Phase 145 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-13Recruiting
A Randomized Phase III Trial Evaluating Pathologic Complete Response Rates in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Positive, Large Operable and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy of Docetaxel, Carboplatin, Trastuzumab [NCT02003209]Phase 3315 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-15Active, not recruiting
Two Arm, Multicentric, Randomized, Open Label, Parallel, Multiple Dose Study Subcutaneous Injection of Goserelin 3.6 mg (Eurofarma) vs ZOLADEX 3.6 mg (AstraZeneca) Administered Subcutaneously in Premenopausal Patients With Breast Cancer. [NCT03936933]Phase 368 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-30Recruiting
A Two Arm, Multi Centric, Randomised, Open Label, Parallel Study to Compare Pharmacodynamics of Subcutaneous Goserelin 10.8mg Injection (Sponsor) With ZOLADEX® 10.8mg Injection (AstraZeneca) in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT03936218]Phase 394 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-30Recruiting
Phase III Trial of LHRH Analog Administration During Chemotherapy to Reduce Ovarian Failure Following Chemotherapy in Early Stage, Hormone-Receptor Negative Breast Cancer [NCT00068601]Phase 3257 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
A Double Blinded Randomized Crossover Phase III Study of Oral Thalidomide Versus Placebo in Patients With Stage D0 Androgen Dependent Prostate Cancer Following Limited Hormonal Ablation [NCT00004635]Phase 3159 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-03-01Completed
A Phase III Randomized Prospective Trial of Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy in Surgically Treated Prostate Cancer Patients at High Risk for Recurrence [NCT00003645]Phase 364 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-06-14Terminated(stopped due to Per PI request)
Randomized Phase II Study OF Goserelin (G) Plus Fulvestrant (F) vs. G Plus Anastrozole (A)vs. G Alone for HR+, Tamoxifen Pretreated, Premenopausal Woman [NCT01266213]Phase 2147 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-12-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomized ,Open Label Study Comparing the Efficacy of Zoladex® Combined With Arimidex® for 3-2 Years After Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs) as an Adjuvant Therapy for 2-3 Years Versus Continuing Tamoxifen up to 5 Years for Premenopausal E [NCT01352091]Phase 3670 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-05-31Recruiting
Multicentre, International Neoadjuvant Randomized Double-blind Trial Comparing Fulvestrant® to a Combination of Fulvestrant® and Palbociclib (CDK 4/6 Inhibitor) in Patients With Operable Luminal Breast Cancer Responding to Fulvestrant® [NCT03447132]Phase 3354 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-20Completed
Hypo-Combi Trial: Combined Hypofractionated External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) Plus Interstitial High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy (HDR-BT) Boost for Intermediate/High Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT05003752]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-01Active, not recruiting
The TEEL Study: A Phase I Trial of Tamoxifen With Ribociclib (LEE011) in Adult Patients With Advanced ER+ (HER2 Negative) Breast Cancer [NCT02586675]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-23Completed
The Study of Goserelin Plus Fulvestrant Comparing With Goserelin Plus Anastrozole for Advanced Breast Cancer [NCT02072512]Phase 2180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-01-31Recruiting
Study of Adjuvant Toremifene With or Without Goserrelin in Premenopausal Women With Stage I-IIIA, Hormonal Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Accompanied With or Without Chemotherapy Induced Amenorrhoea [NCT02132390]Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-05-31Not yet recruiting
A National Phase IIIb, Multi-center, Open Label Study for Women and Men With Hormone-receptor Positive, HER-2 Negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated With Ribociclib (LEE011) in Combination With Letrozole [NCT03096847]Phase 3502 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-24Completed
Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation and Enzalutamide: Using Multiparametric MRI to Evaluate Intraprostatic Tumor Responses and Androgen Resistance Patterns in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer [NCT02430480]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-03Active, not recruiting
Asian, International, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial of Tamoxifen With or Without Palbociclib ± Goserelin in Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT03423199]Phase 3180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-02-09Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined With Enzalutamide and Abiraterone Using Multiparametric MRI and 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer [NCT03860987]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-30Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Goserelin for Ovarian Protection in Premenopausal Patients Receiving Cyclophosphamide Containing Chemotherapy: Menstruation Outcome [NCT03475758]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase 2 Trial of Radium Ra 223 Dichloride in Combination With Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Patients With Oligometastatic Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT03361735]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Prostate Cancer [NCT02346253]163 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-13Active, not recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized Phase ll Study of Letrozole Versus Letrozole Plus Everolimus for Hormone Receptor-PositivePremenopausal Women With Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer on Goserelin Treatment After Progression on Tamoxifen [NCT02313051]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-12-31Not yet recruiting
Treatment With Long Acting GnRH Antagonist Degarelix in Women With Endometriosis Recurrence [NCT01712763]Phase 3360 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Phase III Study of Image Guided Radiation Therapy With or Without Androgen Suppression for Intermediate Risk Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT01492972]Phase 3192 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-01-31Recruiting
An Open Label, Randomised, Parallel Group, Multicentre, Non-inferiority Study to Compare ZOLADEX 10.8 mg With ZOLADEX 3.6 mg in Chinese Pre-menopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive and HER2 Negative Early Breast Cancer [NCT03658213]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to CTP of LARES has been out of the expire date, we are trying RWS pathway for the indication expend)
A PHASE III TRIAL COMPARING WHOLE PELVIC IRRADIATION FOLLOWED BY A CONEDOWN BOOST TO BOOST IRRADIATION ONLY AND COMPARING NEOADJUVANT TO ADJUVANT TOTAL ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION (TAS) [NCT00769548]Phase 31,322 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-04-30Completed
A Randomized Phase 2 Non-inferiority Trial of (Z)-Endoxifen and Exemestane + Goserelin as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Premenopausal Women With ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer [NCT05607004]Phase 2180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-14Recruiting
A Phase II Study of PROSTVAC-V (Vaccinia)/TRICOM and PROSTVAC-F (Fowlpox)/TRICOM With GM-CSF in Patients With PSA Progression After Local Therapy for Prostate Cancer [NCT00108732]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Evaluation of the Antitumor Activity, Safety, and Pharmacokinetic Profile of FCN-437c in Combination With Fulvestrant or Letrozole + Goserelin in Female Patients With ER+, HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer [NCT05004142]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-30Recruiting
Intramuscular Mechanisms of Androgen Deprivation-related Sarcopenia [NCT03867357]60 participants (Actual)Observational2018-12-07Active, not recruiting
Role of Fulvestrant in The Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer in Premenopausal Women [NCT03591549]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-08-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1/2 Study of Darolutamide and Abemaciclib in High-Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT05617885]Phase 1/Phase 293 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-09Recruiting
Androgen Suppression With Stereotactic Body or External Beam Radiation Therapy (ASSERT): A Phase II Randomized Trial for Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT02594072]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-04-30Active, not recruiting
Phase III Trial of Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy and Standard Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) With a GNRH Agonist vs. Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy and Enhanced ADT With a GNRH Agonist and TAK-700 For Men With High Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT01546987]Phase 3239 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Active, not recruiting
Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging Strategies as a Non-invasive Biomarker of Vascular and Extracellular Matrix Morphology in Women With Uterine Fibroids. [NCT00746031]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Phase 3 Study of Experience With a Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist Prior to Myomectomy - Comparison of 2 Versus 3 Monthly Doses. [NCT01581944]Phase 368 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation Versus Mitoxantrone Plus Prednisone Plus Androgen Deprivation in Selected High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Following Radical Prostatectomy [NCT00004124]Phase 3983 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-10-15Completed
COMPLEEMENT-1: An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Ribociclib (LEE011) in Combination With Letrozole for the Treatment of Men and Pre/Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-positive (HR+) HER2-negative (HE [NCT02941926]Phase 33,246 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-30Completed
Radiation Therapy and Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery for Prostate Cancer (RADICALS) [NCT00541047]Phase 34,236 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Phase II Study Comparing Salvage Radiotherapy in Combination With 6 Months of Androgen-deprivation Therapy Versus Anti-androgen Therapy With Apalutamide in Patients With Biochemical Progression After Radical Prostatectomy [NCT03899077]Phase 2202 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-05Recruiting
Phase II Evaluation of Early Oral Estramustine, Oral Etoposide and Intravenous Paclitaxel in Combination With Hormone Therapy in Patients With High-Risk Metastatic Adenocarinoma of the Prostate [NCT00028769]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-12-31Completed
Intermittent Androgen Deprivation in Patients With Stage D2 Prostate Cancer, Phase III [NCT00002651]Phase 33,040 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-05-31Completed
A PHASE III TRIAL OF THE STUDY OF ENDOCRINE THERAPY USED AS A CYTOREDUCTIVE AND CYTOSTATIC AGENT PRIOR TO RADIATION THERAPY IN GOOD PROGNOSIS LOCALLY CONFINED ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE [NCT00002597]Phase 32,028 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-10-31Completed
Aromatase Inhibitors or Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonists for the Management of Uterine Adenomyosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01218581]Phase 2/Phase 332 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
Precision Platform Study of HR+/ HER2-advanced Breast Cancer Based on SNF Typing (A Prospective, Open-label, Multi-center, Phase II Platform Study) [NCT05594095]Phase 2140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-30Recruiting
Prospective Randomized Controlled Study on the Risk and Clinical Benefit of Chemotherapy and Intensive Endocrine Therapy for Luminal B1 Early-stage Breast Cancer [NCT03373708]Phase 2/Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-12-20Not yet recruiting
Randomized, Multicentre, Phase III Study in Patients With Intermediate-risk T1 T2 Prostate Adenocarcinomas, to Verify the Role of Six Months of Total Androgen Blockade for Two Dosage Levels of Prostate Radiation Therapy (70 Gy and 76 Gy) Versus Prostate R [NCT00223145]Phase 3600 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-12-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase III Trial of External Beam of Radiotherapy +/- Total Androgen Suppression for High Risk Clinically Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer [NCT00116220]Phase 3206 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-09-30Completed
Presurgical Treatment With Ribociclib and Letrozole in Patients With Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: the NEOLETRIB Study. [NCT05163106]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-01Recruiting
Phase II Trial of Radiation With Androgen Deprivation: Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone and Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone Agonist Prior to Radiation Therapy [NCT01023061]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Endocrine Therapy in Combination With OSI-906 (an IGF-1R Inhibitor) and Erlotinib (Tarceva®, an EGFR Inhibitor) in Patients With Hormone-sensitive Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT01205685]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Terminated(stopped due to PI closed study early, all patients experienced severe toxicities and progressed)
Neuropsychobiological Correlates of Sex-steroid Hormone Manipulation in Healthy Women: a Risk Model for Depression [NCT02661789]63 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Phase I/II Study of Radioimmunoguided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Prostate Cancer [NCT00653757]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Parallel, Active-controlled Phase 1 Study to Compare Pharmacokinetics Pharmacodynamics and Safety of Goserelin Acetate Sustained-Release Microspheres for Injection (LY01022) With Zoladex® 10.8mg Following Single Administration in [NCT05856630]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-31Not yet recruiting
Bone Mineral Density Alterations and Correlations With Bone and Muscle Metabolism Parameters During Menstrual Cessation Due to GnRH Therapy and After Menstrual Restoration [NCT04203212]41 participants (Actual)Observational2019-10-01Completed
Effect of Goserelin (Zoladex®) in Spinal and Bulbar Muscular Atrophy in Thai Patients [NCT00851461]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Phase III Study of Neoadjuvant Docetaxel and Androgen Suppression Plus Radiation Therapy Versus Androgen Suppression Alone Plus Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Localized Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT00651326]Phase 348 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-02Terminated(stopped due to Poor accrual)
Phase 2 Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of a Monthly Dosing Regimen of Ozarelix Versus Goserelin Depot (Zoladex®) in Men With Prostate Cancer [NCT01252693]Phase 2203 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant IMC-A12 Combined With Androgen Deprivation Prior to Prostatectomy [NCT00769795]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Goserline Acetate Versus Dienogest in Treatment of Pain Associated With Endometriosis [NCT05013242]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-25Recruiting
A Phase IV, Randomised, Open-label, Multi-centre Study to Assess the Impact on Disease Control, Safety, Patient and Clinician Experience of Changing Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer From a 3-monthly LHRH Agonist to 6-monthly Injections of Decapeptyl [NCT01673984]Phase 427 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Terminated(stopped due to The study was discontinued prematurely by the sponsor due to non-medical reasons)
A Randomized Study of Finite Androgen Ablation vs. Finite Androgen Ablation in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone in Patients With Prostate Cancer Who Have PSA Progression After Prostatectomy and/or Radiotherapy [NCT01786265]Phase 2310 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-02-05Active, not recruiting
Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group, Multi-centre Phase II Clinical Trial of Active Cellular Immunotherapy With Preparation DCVAC/PCa in Combination With Hormone Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT02107391]Phase 263 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Arimidex Plus Zoladex in the Treatment of Hormone Receptor Positive, Metastatic Carcinoma of the Breast in Premenopausal Women [NCT00186121]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-10-31Completed
Long-term Effects of Enhanced Systemic Therapy and Tumor-directed Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Confirmed by Conventional Imaging Modality: a Prospective, Single-arm Study. [NCT05212857]Phase 2160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-30Recruiting
Autonomic and Renal Contributions to Hypertension With Androgen Deprivation Therapy [NCT05700903]Phase 4228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-20Recruiting
Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effects of a New Depot Formulation of Goserelin Acetate 10.8 mg, on Testosterone Levels in Ambulatory Patients With Carcinoma of the Prostate [NCT04060043]Early Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-21Completed
"A Randomized Multicenter Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Selective Neoadjuvant Treatment According to Immunohistochemical Subtype for HER2 Negative Breast Cancer Patients" [NCT00432172]Phase 2189 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-24Completed
A Phase II Randomized Study of the Combination of Ribociclib Plus Goserelin Acetate With Hormonal Therapy Versus Physician Choice Chemotherapy in Premenopausal or Perimenopausal Patients With Hormone Receptor-positive/ HER2-negative Inoperable Locally Adv [NCT03839823]Phase 2223 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-25Completed
Randomisierte Phase II Studie Zum Einsatz Von Goserelin Und Oralen Kontrazeptiva Zur Reduktion Ovarieller Toxizitäten während Zytostatischer Primärtherapie Bei Fertilen Patientinnen Mit Hodgkin Lymphom in Fortgeschrittenen Stadien [NCT01014507]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Phase II Study of GW786034 (Pazopanib) in Stage D0 Relapsed Androgen Sensitive Prostate Cancer Following Limited GnRH Agonist Therapy [NCT00454571]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial on the Addition of Dutasteride to Combined Androgen Blockade Therapy Versus Combined Androgen Blockade Therapy Alone in Patients With Recurrent and/or Metastatic Salivary Duct Carcinoma - DUCT Study [NCT05513365]Phase 298 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-27Recruiting
Phase II-III Trial of Adjuvant Radiotherapy Following Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Adjuvant Docetaxel [NCT03070886]Phase 2/Phase 3175 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-16Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of the Luteolytic Effect of a Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist After the Administration of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) in the Initial Follicular Phase a Its Influence on the Prognosis of in Vitro Fertilization Treatment [NCT00948805]Phase 325 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-01-31Recruiting
Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing 3-D Conformal Radiation Therapy (RT) vs. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Post- Prostatectomy Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT02678520]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to PI no longer at institution. Study terminated prior to enrolling subjects.)
PErsonalized TREatment of High-risk MAmmary Cancer - the PETREMAC Trial [NCT02624973]Phase 2200 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-15Active, not recruiting
GnRHa Combined With hCG and hMG for Treatment of Patients With Non-obstructive Azoospermia: A Single-center Prospective Study in China [NCT02544191]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-12-31Recruiting
The Effect of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Regulation of Muscle Protein Metabolism and Blood Glucose [NCT03440879]23 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-21Terminated(stopped due to Low recruitment rate)
Phase II Study of Darolutamide (ODM-201) in Patients With Androgen Receptor-positive Salivary Gland Carcinoma (Discovary Study) [NCT05694819]Phase 256 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-17Active, not recruiting
Phase II, Multicenter, Single Arm Trial to Assess the Feasibility of First Line Ribociclib in Combination With a Non Steroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Elderly Patients With Hormone Receptor Positive/HER2 Negative Advanced Breast Cancer [NCT03944434]Phase 2116 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-27Active, not recruiting
Multi-centre, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel-group Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety Between Anastrozole (ZD1033) and Tamoxifen in Pre- and Post-operative Administration Under Goserelin Acetate Treatment for Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients [NCT00605267]Phase 3197 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
An Open-label, Randomised, Parallel Group, Multicentre Study to Compare ZOLADEX 10.8 mg Given Every 12 Weeks With ZOLADEX 3.6 mg Given Every 4 Weeks in Pre-menopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer [NCT00322348]Phase 298 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Comparison of Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitors With Ovarian Suppression Versus Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Patients With Hormone Receptor-positive Breast Cancer (COMPETE): a Randomized Phase 3 Trial [NCT02532400]Phase 321 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Hard to enroll expected number of eligible patients.)
A Randomised Phase III Study for Evaluating the Role of the Addition of Ovarian Function Suppression to Tamoxifen in Young Women With Hormone-Sensitive Breast Cancer Who Remain in Premenopause or Regain Menstruation After Chemotherapy [NCT00912548]Phase 31,234 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-05-31Enrolling by invitation
A Randomised, Parallel-arm, Open-label Trial Comparing Degarelix With Goserelin Plus Anti-androgen Flare Protection (Bicalutamide), in Terms of Reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) [NCT00831233]Phase 342 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Poor recruitment due to rare targeted population)
A Randomised, Parallel-arm, Open-label Trial Comparing Degarelix With Goserelin Plus Anti-androgen Flare Protection (Bicalutamide), in Terms of Volume Reduction of the Prostate in Patients With Prostate Cancer Being Candidates for Medical Castration [NCT00884273]Phase 3182 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Neoadjuvant Androgen Depletion in Combination With Vorinostat Followed by Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Total Androgen-Receptor Gene Expression Targeted Therapy (TARGET) [NCT00589472]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Randomized Comparison of Immediate Versus Deferred Androgen Deprivation Therapy Using Goserelin for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Radiotherapy. [NCT00439751]Phase 379 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Effect of Increasing Testosterone on Insulin Sensitivity in Men With the Metabolic Syndrome [NCT00438321]Phase 166 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Terminated(stopped due to PI relocated)
PREDIX Luminal B - Neoadjuvant Response-guided Treatment of ER Positive Tumors With High Proliferation or Low Proliferation With Metastatic Nodes. Part of a Platform of Translational Phase II Trials Based on Molecular Subtypes [NCT02603679]Phase 2181 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Active, not recruiting
Phase II Trial of Temporary Androgen Deprivation Therapy in High Risk Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy [NCT00937768]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Terminated
The Role of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Management of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Oligometastases: An Adaptive Phase II/III Randomized Trial. [NCT02685397]Phase 2/Phase 3130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-31Recruiting
Androgen Deprivation and Localized Radiotherapy to Metastases in Patients With Oligometastatic Hormone - Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT00544830]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-18Active, not recruiting
Utility of Exosomal microRNAs to Predict Response to Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT02366494]60 participants (Anticipated)Observational2015-04-29Active, not recruiting
Phase III Randomized Comparison of Pelvic Radiotherapy Alone vs Pelvic Radiotherapy Plus the LHRH Analogue Goserelin and Cyproterone Acetate in Carcinoma of the Prostate at High Risk for Metastasis [NCT00849082]Phase 30 participants Interventional1987-05-31Completed
Phase I Study Evaluating Extended Field Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Docetaxel in Patients With Prostate Cancer Associated With Pelvic Node Metastasis [NCT00482807]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
Protection of Ovarian Function With Goserelin Acetate in Premenopausal Early Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Adjuvant Chemotherapy: An Open Label, Randomised, Multi-Centre, Phase IIIb Study [NCT00888082]Phase 3102 participants (Anticipated)InterventionalWithdrawn
An Assessment of the Biological and Clinical Effects of Palbociclib (PD 0332991) With Ovarian Suppression and Letrozole in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Patients With Premenopausal Estrogen-Receptor Positive/HER2-Negative Primary Breast Cancer [NCT03628066]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-22Completed
The Effects of Adjuvant Zoladex Plus Tamoxifen on Breast Density in Pre- or Peri-menopausal Women With Early-stage Breast Cancer [NCT00827307]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Phase III Study of the Comparison of Abarelix Versus Goserelin Plus Bicalutamide in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Prostate Cancer. A One Year Randomised, Open Label, Multi-Centre Phase III Trial. [NCT00841113]Phase 3177 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-01-31Completed
Sunitinib, Hormonal Ablation and External Beam Radiation Therapy for High-Risk and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT00631527]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Phase III, Open-Label Randomized, Parallel, Active-Control Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Histrelin Subdermal Implant in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT01394263]Phase 359 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-05-31Completed
A PHASE III TRIAL OF THE USE OF LONG TERM TOTAL ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION FOLLOWING NEOADJUVANT HORMONAL CYTOREDUCTION AND RADIOTHERAPY IN LOCALLY ADVANCED CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE [NCT00767286]Phase 30 participants InterventionalCompleted
Neoadjuvant Hormonal Ablation, Imatinib Mesylate and Docetaxel Followed by Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT00500110]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Phase I/II Trial of Post-Prostatectomy Radiation Therapy, Hormonal Therapy and Concurrent Docetaxel for High Risk Pathologic T2-T3NO (Tumor-3, Node-0) Prostate Cancer [NCT00669162]Phase 1/Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
The Impact of Continuous Versus Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Bone Mineral Density Change in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04248621]Phase 4164 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-23Recruiting
A Randomised, Parallel Arm, Open-label Trial Comparing Degarelix With Goserelin Plus Anti-androgen Flare Protection (Bicalutamide), in Terms of Prostate Size Reduction in Prostate Cancer Patients of Intermediate-to-high Risk, Who Require Neoadjuvant Hormo [NCT00833248]Phase 3246 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Phase II Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety of an Alternative Dosing Schedule of Palbociclib in Metastatic Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer [NCT03007979]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-15Completed
OMPCa-Shanghai: An Open-label, Randomized Prospective Phase II Trial of Androgen Deprivation Therapy or Androgen Deprivation Therapy Plus Definitive Treatment (Radiation or Surgery) of the Primary Tumor in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT02742675]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Post-trial Access Roll-over Study to Allow Access to Ribociclib (LEE011) for Patients Who Are on Ribociclib Treatment in Novartis-sponsored Study [NCT05161195]Phase 4137 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-07Recruiting
Phase III Randomized Study of Adjuvant Radiotherapy With Versus Without Concurrent Goserelin in Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery for Recurrent or Refractory Prostate Cancer [NCT00423475]Phase 3743 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Phase Ib Study of Limited Androgen Ablation and Two Dose Levels of Temsirolimus (NSC#683864) in Patients With Prostate Cancer Who Have a Biochemical Relapse After Prostatectomy and/or Radiotherapy [NCT00512668]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Terminated
PREDIX Luminal A - Neoadjuvant Response-guided Treatment of Slowly Proliferating Hormone Receptor Positive Tumors. Part of a Platform of Translational Phase II Trials Based on Molecular Subtypes [NCT02592083]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Active, not recruiting
Long Term Changes in Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk in Patients Receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Advanced Prostate Cancer, With Stratification of Treatment Based on Presenting Values [NCT00536653]618 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-10-31Completed
Phase II Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of LEE011(Ribociclib) or Placebo in Combination With Endocrine Therapy for the Treatment of Pre- and Postmenopausal Chinese Women With HR Positive, HER2-negative, Advanced Breast Cancer, Includin [NCT03671330]Phase 2327 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Neoadjuvant Study of Palbociclib in Combination With Letrozole and Trastuzumab as Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stage II-III ER+ HER2+ Breast Cancer (PALTAN) [NCT02907918]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Futility)
[NCT00286351]Phase 420 participants Interventional2005-01-31Completed
An Open Label, Randomized, Phase II Trial of Metabolic Complications in Patients Treated With Enzalutamide vs Standard ADT for the Treatment of Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT02278185]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-11Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Phase II Trial of Brief Androgen-Ablation Combined With Cell-based CG1940/CG8711 Immunotherapy For Prostate Cancer in Patients With Non-Metastatic, Biochemically Relapsed Prostate Cancer [NCT00771017]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Withdrawn
ASP3550 Phase III Study - An Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Arm Study, Comparing ASP3550 With Goserelin Acetate in Patients With Prostate Cancer - [NCT01964170]Phase 3234 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-13Completed
A Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant PD 0332991, a Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (Cdk) 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination With Anastrozole in Women With Clinical Stage 2 or 3 Estrogen Receptor Positive and HER2 Negative Breast Cancer [NCT01723774]Phase 284 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-10Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Talazoparib With Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Abiraterone in Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT04734730]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-04Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-Label, Neoadjuvant Prostate Cancer Trial of Abiraterone Acetate Plus LHRHa Versus LHRHa Alone [NCT01088529]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase Ⅲ Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Goserelin Acetate Sustained-Release Microspheres for Injection (LY01005) and ZOLADEX® in Patients With Prostate Cancer [NCT04563936]Phase 3290 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-06Completed
Parallel Phase III Randomized Trials of Genomic-Risk Stratified Unfavorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: De-Intensification and Intensification Clinical Trial Evaluation (GUIDANCE) [NCT05050084]Phase 32,050 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-03Recruiting
Parallel Phase III Randomized Trials for High Risk Prostate Cancer Evaluating De-Intensification for Lower Genomic Risk and Intensification of Concurrent Therapy for Higher Genomic Risk With Radiation (PREDICT-RT*) [NCT04513717]Phase 32,478 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-15Recruiting
Strength, Aging, and Memory in Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Study of the Effects of Androgen Deprivation on Neurocognition and Frailty [NCT04852224]20 participants (Actual)Observational2021-10-01Completed
Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy Plus Docetaxel Followed by Radical Prostatectomy for Men With Proven or Suspected Node-positive Prostate Cancer [NCT01076335]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Short Versus Long-term Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined With Salvage Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer Patients With Biochemical Recurrence After Prostatectomy: a Multicentre Phase III Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT05781217]Phase 3534 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-14Recruiting
A Randomized Study Comparing Goserelin or Expectant Management Following Laparoscopic Surgery for Advanced Endometriosis [NCT00654524]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-03-31Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Neoadjuvant PARP Inhibition Followed by Radical Prostatectomy in Patients With Unfavorable Intermediate-Risk or High-Risk Prostate Cancer With BRCA1/2 Gene Alterations (NePtune) [NCT05498272]Phase 232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-01Recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Investigation of Trelstar Versus Continued Therapy in Patients Receiving Lupron or Zoladex for Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT02749825]Phase 441 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Withdrawal of funding support)
Phase II Randomized Study of Abiraterone Acetate Plus ADT Versus APALUTAMIDE Versus Abiraterone and APALUTAMIDE in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer With Non-castrate Testosterone Levels [NCT02867020]Phase 2128 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-11Completed
An Open Label, Randomised, Parallel Group, Multicentre Study to Compare ZOLADEX™ 10.8 mg Given Every 12 Weeks With ZOLADEX 3.6 mg Given Every 4 Weeks in Pre-menopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. [NCT01073865]Phase 3222 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-26Completed
An Open-Label, Multi-Centre, Randomised, Parallel-Arm One-Year Trial, Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Degarelix Three-Month Dosing Regimen With Goserelin Acetate in Patients With Prostate Cancer Requiring Androgen Deprivation Therapy [NCT00946920]Phase 3859 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Efficacy of Laparoscopic Surgery Combined With GnRH-a in the Treatment of Endometriosis Associated Infertility: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized-control-trial [NCT02779387]1,184 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-31Not yet recruiting
Neoadjuvant Estradiol or Androgen Deprivation in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT00167648]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Endocrine Therapy in Combination With OSI-906 (an IGF-1R Inhibitor) With or Without Erlotinib (Tarceva, an EGFR Inhibitor) in Patients With Hormone-sensitive Metastatic Breast Cancer. [NCT01013506]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study was abandoned before opening to accrual. Replaced by another study.)
An Open, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study of Chidamide Combined With Exemestane (+/- Goserelin) Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients of Stage II-III HR-positive/HER2-negative Breast Cancer [NCT05253066]Phase 2/Phase 3130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-25Not yet recruiting
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of 400 mg of Ribociclib in Combination With Non-steroidal Aromatase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Pre- and Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-positive, HER [NCT03822468]Phase 2376 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-11Active, not recruiting
BYLieve: A Phase II, Multicenter, Open-label, Three-cohort, Non- Comparative Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Alpelisib Plus Fulvestrant or Letrozole in Patients With PIK3CA Mutant, Hormone Receptor (HR) Positive, HER2-negative Advanced Breast C [NCT03056755]Phase 2383 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-14Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Goserelin Plus Anastrozole for the Treatment of Male Patients With Hormone-Receptor Positive Metastatic or Recurrent Breast Cancer [NCT00217659]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to poor accrual)
A Randomized, Open-label and Parallel Phase I Study to Compare Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Safety of Goserelin Acetate Sustained-Release Microspheres for Injection (LY01005) and ZOLADEX® Following Multiple Administration in Patients With Prosta [NCT05140512]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-04Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase Ⅲ Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Goserelin Acetate Sustained-Release Microspheres for Injection (LY01005) and ZOLADEX® in Patients With Breast Cancer [NCT05110170]Phase 3188 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-15Completed
A Randomized Trial Of Raloxifene Plus Zoladex For Prevention Of Breast Cancer [NCT00031850]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2000-03-31Completed
Phase III Randomized Study Of Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy With And Without Docetaxel And Estramustine In Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Or With A High Risk Of Relapse [NCT00055731]Phase 3413 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-14Completed
Phase III Study of Local or Systemic Therapy INtensification DIrected by PET in Prostate CAncer Patients With Post-ProstaTEctomy Biochemical Recurrence (INDICATE) [NCT04423211]Phase 3804 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-08Recruiting
A Phase Ib Trial of MK-2206 (an AKT Inhibitor) in Combination With Endocrine Therapy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer [NCT01240928]Phase 10 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to Funding not available, study did not open to accrual and will not open in future)
CASPAR - A Phase III Trial of Enzalutamide and Rucaparib as a Novel Therapy in First-Line Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT04455750]Phase 361 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-19Active, not recruiting
Density Lowering Effect of Ovarian Function Suppression in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients Who Had no Density Change With One Year of Tamoxifen Treatment [NCT03664895]Phase 3224 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-03Recruiting
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Endocrine Therapy Plus Entinostat/Placebo in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer [NCT02115282]Phase 3608 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Ovarian Function Suppression And ExemesTane With or Without PalbocIclib in PreMenopausal Women With ER Positive / HER-2 Negative MetAstatic Breast Cancer [NCT02917005]Phase 2160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-07Recruiting
Veterans Affairs Seamless Phase II/III Randomized Trial of STAndard Systemic theRapy With or Without PET-directed Local Therapy for OligoRecurrenT Prostate Cancer (VA STARPORT) [NCT04787744]Phase 2/Phase 3464 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-01Recruiting
A Phase II Non-randomized, Parallel Group Study of Goserelin or Leuprorelin Plus Letrozole in Premenopausal Patients Versus Letrozole Alone in Postmenopausal Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT00532272]Phase 278 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of Vaginal Repair and Vaginal Repair Combined With GnRHa in the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Diverticula: a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02932761]220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-30Not yet recruiting
Medical Ethics Committee of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University [NCT04356430]Phase 275 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-01Active, not recruiting
A Multi-centre, Single-arm, Prospective Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy Using Zoladex (Goserelin) and Casodex (Bicalutamide) in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy. [NCT03971110]Phase 49 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-28Terminated(stopped due to Due to the limited potential patients pool, the enrollment goal could not be achieved. After review and communication, the decision to teminate study was made.)
A Phase IIIb Study to Characterize the Effectiveness and Safety of ADJUVANT Ribociclib in Broad Real-World patIent Populations in Stage II anD Stage III HR+/HER2- Early Breast canceR (ADJUVANT WIDER) [NCT05827081]Phase 32,500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-16Not yet recruiting
A Pilot Study of Hormonal Therapy Combined With Central Memory T Cells (Tcm) for Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT03587285]Phase 1/Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-23Active, not recruiting
Phase III Randomized Study of Adjuvant Therapy With Tamoxifen vs Endocrine Ablation vs Tamoxifen Plus Endocrine Ablation vs No Adjuvant Therapy in Patients Under Age 50 With Operable Breast Cancer [NCT00002460]Phase 30 participants Interventional1987-09-30Active, not recruiting
PROTOCOL FOR THE SCOTTISH PREMENOPAUSAL CHEMO-ENDOCRINE TRIAL [NCT00002580]Phase 31,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1993-06-30Completed
A Phase III Prospective Randomized Trial of Dose-Escalated Radiotherapy With or Without Short-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT00936390]Phase 31,538 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Active, not recruiting
Longitudinal, Randomized, Open and Prospective Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Continuous vs Intermittent Maximum Androgen Blockade (CMAB vs IMAB) With Goserelin-Bicalutamide Combination in the Treatment of Hormonal naïve With Metastatic Prosta [NCT00255268]Phase 415 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-08-31Withdrawn
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing an Association of Hormonal Treatment and Docetaxel Versus the Hormonal Treatment Alone in Metastatic Prostate Cancers [NCT00104715]Phase 3385 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-18Completed
A Randomized-Controlled Trial of Transcutaneous Oestrogen Patches Versus LHRH Agonists in Prostate Cancer [NCT00303784]Phase 32,200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-03-31Recruiting
PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF ENDORECTAL MRI IN PREDICTING OUTCOME AFTER COMBINED RADIATION AND ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION FOR PROSTATE CANCER: A PROSPECTIVE PHASE II STUDY [NCT00002889]Phase 2180 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-05-31Completed
Phase II, Randomized, Open-label, International, Multicenter Study to Compare Efficacy of Standard Chemotherapy vs. Letrozole Plus Abemaciclib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in HR-positive/HER2-negative High/Intermediate Risk Breast Cancer Patients [NCT04293393]Phase 2200 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-02Active, not recruiting
Phase I Trial of Concurrent Taxotere With Radiation Therapy and Hormonal Therapy For Clinically Localized High Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT00099086]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-16Active, not recruiting
A Phase III Trial of Short Term Androgen Deprivation With Pelvic Lymph Node or Prostate Bed Only Radiotherapy (SPPORT) in Prostate Cancer Patients With a Rising PSA After Radical Prostatectomy [NCT00567580]Phase 31,792 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Active, not recruiting
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Women With Uterine Leiomyomas: Open Randomized Clinical Trial Of Non Inferiority Between Oral Dienogest, Oral Desogestrel and Subcutaneous Goserelin [NCT01738724]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Terminated(stopped due to PI went for a post-doc course and when he came back he moved for another job)
A Prospective, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Zoladex 3.6mg Combined With CEF Chemotherapy as Neo-Adjuvant Therapy in Hormone Responsive, Premenopausal, Operable Breast Cancer [NCT00488722]0 participants Interventional2007-04-30Recruiting
Phase II Pilot of Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy With Femara® (Letrozole) and Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Estrogen Receptor Positive Women With Stage IV Carcinoma of the Breast [NCT00498901]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Terminated
An Open-label, Multi-Centre, Extension Trial, Evaluating the Long-Term Progression-Free Survival of Degarelix or Goserelin Three-Month Dosing Regimens in Patients With Prostate Cancer Requiring Androgen Deprivation Therapy [NCT01242748]Phase 3288 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Inadequate recruitment resulting in a too low patient number for collection of long term efficacy data.)
A Randomized Phase II Study of Androgen Deprivation Combined With IMC-A12 Versus Androgen Deprivation Alone for Patients With New Hormone Sensitive Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT01120236]Phase 2211 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Docetaxel, Estramustine and Short Term Androgen Withdrawal for Patients With a Rising PSA After Definitive Local Treatment [NCT00165399]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Real World Evidence Study on Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patient Characteristics, Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in the Pirkanmaa Hospital District in Finland [NCT05701007]1 participants (Actual)Observational2023-02-13Completed
Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients With High-Risk, Hormone Receptor-Positive and HER2/Neu Negative Breast Cancer [NCT01674140]Phase 31,939 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-12Active, not recruiting
Pilot Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab in Combination With Hormonal and Radiotherapy in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT00348998]Phase 218 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-04-30Active, not recruiting
Phase II Trial of MK-2206 (an AKT Inhibitor) in Combination With Endocrine Therapy in Patients With Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer [NCT01240941]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding was not available)
Administration During Chemotherapy to Reduce Ovarian Failure Following Chemotherapy in Early Stage, Hormone-Receptor Negative Breast Cancer [NCT01530607]Phase 3416 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
A Phase I Study Of SU5416 With Androgen Ablation And Radiation In Patients With Intermediate and Advanced Stage Prostate Cancer [NCT00026377]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
A Phase II Trial Of Oral Bicalutamide With Subcutaneous Goserelin In Patients With Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, Or Peritoneal Carcinoma In Second Or Greater Remission [NCT00012090]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-09-30Completed
Randomized Phase III Step-Up Study On Initial Antiandrogen Monotherapy In Comparison With Watchful Waiting In Asymptomatic T1-3 Any G (Any Gleason) NO or Nx M0 Prostate Cancer Patients Without Local Treatment With Curative Intent [NCT00014586]Phase 3110 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-01-31Terminated(stopped due to low accrual)
Randomized And Multicentric Phase III Study Evaluating The Benefit By Using A Chemotherapy With FEC 100 And Docetaxel In Non Metastatic Breast Cancer Which Has Relapsed After A Conservative Surgery [NCT00053911]Phase 30 participants Interventional2002-11-30Terminated
Phase III Randomized Trial Study Comparing the Outcome of High-Dose IMRT (86.4 GY) Alone With IMRT to 75.6 GY Plus Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation in Patients With High Grade Intermediate Risk and Unfavorable Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT00067015]Phase 33 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-05-31Completed
A Phase II Study of the Combination of Exemestane and Goserelin in Premenopausal Women With Metastatic Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer [NCT00010010]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-06-30Completed
Three Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy / Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Alone Vs Three Dimensional Conformal Therapy / Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Plus Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy In Localized T1b-c, T2a, N0, M0 Prostatic Carcinoma. A Phase III Ran [NCT00021450]Phase 3819 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
A Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FEC-Chemotherapy vs. EC-Doc-Chemotherapy in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer [NCT00047099]Phase 3446 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-08-31Completed
Evaluation of Response Rate to Pre-Operative Docetaxel + Herceptin Study Part A and Docetaxel Study Part B in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients, Stratified by HER2-Status Trial - PHASE II [(Herceptin Docetaxel Neoadjuvant) HEDON] [NCT00398489]Phase 294 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-10-31Active, not recruiting
Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study to Prevent Chemotherapy Induced Ovarian Failure With the GnRH-Agonist Goserelin in Young Hormone Insensitive Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Anthracycline Containing (Neo-)Adjuvant Chemotherapy [NCT00196846]Phase 262 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
Phase III Randomized Study of a Goserelin Acetate for Preservation of Ovarian Function in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer (PBC) [NCT00429403]Phase 31 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Study stopped due to low accrual.)
A Randomized Phase II Study of Tecemotide in Combination With Standard Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Radiation Therapy for Untreated, Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT01496131]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-24Completed
Neoadjuvant Hormone and Radiation Therapy Followed by Radical Prostatectomy in Patients With High-Risk Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer and Biomarker Research [NCT04894188]38 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-27Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Bipolar Androgen-based Therapy for Men With Androgen Ablation NaÃ-ve Recurrent Prostate Cancer [NCT01750398]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Randomized and Open-label Study to Assess Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Safety of LY01005 Versus Goserelin Comparator (ZOLADEX®) Following a Single Administration in Patients With Prostate Cancer [NCT03450109]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-22Completed
An Open, Phase II Trial Assessing the Objective Response Rate After Combination of Arimidex® 1mg Per os/Day and Zoladex® 3.6 mg Sub Cut/Monthly as 1st Treatment for Premenopausal Receptor Positive Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT00235937]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-12-31Completed
Intermittent Vs Continuous Androgen Deprivation in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT00293670]Phase 4573 participants Interventional1997-05-31Active, not recruiting
A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label Comparison of Pre-surgical Combination of Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab With Concurrent Taxane Chemotherapy or Endocrine Therapy Given for Twelve Weeks With a Quality of Life Assessment of Trastuzumab, Pertu [NCT03272477]Phase 2257 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-05Active, not recruiting
A Randomised Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effect(s) of Casodex 150 mg and Zoladex 3.6 mg on Pathological and Genomic Tumour Markers in Subjects Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Carcinoma [NCT00293696]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
An Open-label, Randomized, Parallel Group, Multicentre Study to Compare Oestradiol Suppression Between ZOLADEX 10.8 mg Depot Given 3 Monthly and ZOLADEX 3.6 mg Depot Given Monthly in Pre-menopausal Patients With ER Positive Early Breast Cancer [NCT00303524]Phase 2170 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Phase I/II Study of Weekly Intravenous Estramustine Phosphate in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT00003394]Phase 1/Phase 218 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind Phase 3 Study of Amcenestrant (SAR439859) Plus Palbociclib Versus Letrozole Plus Palbociclib for the Treatment of Patients With ER (+), HER2 (-) Breast Cancer Who Have Not Received Prior Systemic Anti-cancer Treatme [NCT04478266]Phase 31,068 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-14Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated based on the review by an independent data monitoring committee of the prespecified interim analysis of the Phase 3 AMEERA-5 efficacy data. No new safety signals were observed.)
A Prospective, Randomised, Multi-centre Phase II Study Evaluating the Adjuvant, Neoadjuvant or Palliative Treatmant With Tamoxifen +/- GnRH Analogue Versus Aromatase Inhibitor + GnRH Analogue in Male Breast Cancer Patients [NCT01638247]Phase 356 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer. Real Clinical Practice in Russia [NCT05800197]300 participants (Anticipated)Observational2014-04-15Recruiting
A Phase III,Randomized,Open Label Study Comparing Simultaneous Versus Sequential Use of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and GnRHa up to 2-3 Years for ≤ 45 Year Old Pre-menopausal Hormone Receptor-positive Breast Cancer [NCT01712893]Phase 3216 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
An Open-label, Multi-centre, Randomised, Parallel-group Trial, Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Degarelix One-month Dosing Regimen With Goserelin in Chinese Patients With Prostate Cancer Requiring Androgen Ablation Therapy [NCT01744366]Phase 3285 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Phase I Pilot Study of Samarium-153 Combined With Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy and Radiation Therapy in Men With Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT00328614]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
Adjuvant Ovarian Suppression Plus Aromatase Inhibitor or Tamoxifen for Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer in Women Younger Than 35: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02914158]Phase 3680 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-03-30Recruiting
IVF Outcome in Patients With Peritoneal Endometriosis. The Impact of a Hormonal Treatment of the Endometriosis Prior to the IVF on the Pregnancy Rates. [NCT01682642]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
A Phase 2 Multicohort Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Docetaxel and Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients With DNA Damage Repair Defects or Inflamed Tumors [NCT04126070]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-11Recruiting
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Breast Cancer Precision Platform Series Study- Neoadjuvant Therapy (FASCINATE-N) [NCT05582499]Phase 1/Phase 2716 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-01Recruiting
Effect of Goserelin on the Protection of Ovarian Reserve During (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Young Breast Cancer Patients: A Prospective Cohort Trial [NCT02430103]240 participants (Anticipated)Observational2015-12-25Recruiting
DETECT V / CHEVENDO A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study to Compare Chemo- Versus Endocrine Therapy in Combination With Dual HER2-targeted Therapy of Herceptin® (Trastuzumab) and Perjeta® (Pertuzumab) Plus Kisqali® (Ribociclib) in Patients With HER2 [NCT02344472]Phase 3270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Recruiting
Randomized Phase II Screening Trial of Enzalutamide/MDV-3100 and LHRH Analogue vs Combined Androgen Deprivation (LHRH Analogue + Bicalutamide) in Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT02058706]Phase 271 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
The Regulation of Skeletal Muscle Protein Synthesis by Systemic Hormones and Its Influence on Ageing and Anabolic Resistance [NCT03054168]Phase 334 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-15Active, not recruiting
COMPARISON OF A NEW FORMULATION OF GOSERELIN (Pepti 3.6 mg) to Zoladex® 3.6 mg IN PATIENTS WITH DYSFUNCTIONAL UTERINE BLEEDING REQUIRING ENDOMETRIAL ABLATION. [NCT04428684]Phase 180 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-29Completed
Prospective Phase II Randomized Trial of Evaluating the Effect of Adding LHRH Analogue to the Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Treatment of Triple Negative Breast Cancer on Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) Rates [NCT03444025]Phase 2180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-31Not yet recruiting
Phase II Study Of Neo-Adjuvant Paclitaxel, Estramustine And Carboplatin (TEC) Plus Androgen Ablation Prior To Radiation Therapy In Patients With Poor Prognosis Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT00016913]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-05-31Completed
Bevacizumab Plus Paclitaxel Optimization Study With Interventional Maintenance Endocrine Therapy in Advanced or Metastatic ER-positive HER2-negative Breast Cancer -BOOSTER Trial, a Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study- [NCT01989780]Phase 2160 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Dose-Response of Gonadal Steroids and Bone Turnover in Older Men [NCT00114114]177 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Phase Ib Trial of Enzalutamide in Combination With Radiation Therapy and LHRH Agonist Therapy in the Management of Intermediate and High-Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT02023463]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-02Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Phase II Study for Premenopausal Metastatic or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients: Capivasertib, Goserelin, Fulvestrant With/Without Durvalumab, Versus Goserelin, Fulvestrant, and Durvalumab, Versus Goserelin/ Fulvestrant. [NCT05720260]Phase 256 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-17Recruiting
Pilot Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab in Combination With Hormonal and Radiotherapy in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT00349557]Phase 218 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Ovarian Protection Trial In Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients [OPTION] [NCT00427245]Phase 3400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
Effect of Increasing Testosterone on Insulin Sensitivity in Men With the Metabolic Syndrome [NCT00433173]72 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-05-31Suspended(stopped due to Primary investigator is taking a leave of absence)
Phase II Trial of Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) and Pembrolizumab for Advanced Stage Androgen Receptor-positive Salivary Gland Carcinoma: Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-HN17-111 [NCT03942653]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-30Recruiting
UKCCCR RANDOMISED TRIAL OF ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY AND CHEMOTHERAPY IN WOMEN WITH EARLY BREAST CANCER, THE ADJUVANT BREAST CANCER (ABC) TRIAL [NCT00002582]Phase 36,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1993-06-30Completed
An Open Label, Randomized, Phase III Study, Evaluating the Efficacy of a Combination of Apalutamide With Radiotherapy and LHRH Agonist in High-risk Postprostatectomy Biochemically Relapsed Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT04181203]Phase 3490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-09Recruiting
Effect of Increasing Testosterone Levels on Insulin Sensitivity in Men With the Metabolic Syndrome [NCT00382057]Phase 272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-05-31Withdrawn
PHASE III TRIAL OF ORCHIECTOMY/LHRH ANALOG + FLUTAMIDE + SURAMIN + HYDROCORTISONE VS ORCHIECTOMY/LHRH ANALOG + FLUTAMIDE IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER [NCT00002881]Phase 30 participants Interventional1996-10-31Completed
Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Total Androgen Blockade Versus Total Androgen Blockade Plus Pelvic Irradiation in Clinical Stage T3-4, N0, M0 Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT00002633]Phase 3361 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-02-08Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With or Without Palbociclib in RB-Positive Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT02059213]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
A Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Cyclophosphamide + Methotrexate + Fluorouracil vs. Goserelin + Tamoxifen in Premenopausal, Hormone Receptor-positive, Lymph Node-positive or -Negative Patients [NCT00309478]Phase 31,099 participants (Actual)Interventional1990-12-31Completed
Tamoxifen Versus Anastrozole, Alone or in Combination With Zoledronic Acid, in Premenopausal, Hormone Receptor-positive Breast Cancer Patients (Stage I, II) [NCT00295646]Phase 31,803 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-06-30Completed
A Randomized Phase III Study of Neo-Adjuvant Docetaxel and Androgen Deprivation Prior to Radical Prostatectomy Versus Immediate Radical Prostatectomy in Patients With High-Risk, Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT00430183]Phase 3788 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-08Active, not recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of FCN-437c Versus Placebo in Combination With Letrozole or Anastrozole ± Goserelin in Women With HR-positive and HER2-negative Advanc [NCT05439499]Phase 3434 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-02Recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of FCN-437c Versus Placebo Combined With Fulvestrant ± Goserelin in Women With HR+ and HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer [NCT05438810]Phase 3312 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-18Recruiting
A Single-center, Phase II Neoadjuvant Study of Abiraterone Acetate in the Treatment of Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate [NCT04736108]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-31Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Phase Ib/II Study of Preoperative GDC-0449 and Androgen Ablation Compared to Androgen Ablation Alone Followed by Radical Prostatectomy for Select Patients With Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT01163084]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-09Terminated
Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy Followed by Salvage Surgery for High Risk PSA Failure With Biopsy Proven Local Recurrence After Initial Definitive Radiotherapy [NCT01531205]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Terminated(stopped due to low accrual)
Maximal Suppression of the Androgen Axis in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT00298155]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Multicenter,Prospective Clinical Trial for Reducing Remaining Submucous Fibroids Volume and Preventing Recurrence by Treating With GnRH Analogues or Mifepristone After Transcervical Resection of Type I-II Myoma [NCT05898321]294 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-01Not yet recruiting
Randomized Trial of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Versus Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive HER2 Negative Breast Cancer [NCT02535221]Phase 3234 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-07-29Recruiting
Phase III Randomized Trial of Standard Systemic Therapy (SST) Versus Standard Systemic Therapy Plus Definitive Treatment (Surgery or Radiation) of the Primary Tumor in Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT03678025]Phase 31,273 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-24Recruiting
A Phase III Double Blinded Study of Early Intervention After RADICAl ProstaTEctomy With Androgen Deprivation Therapy With or Without Darolutamide vs. Placebo in Men at Highest Risk of Prostate Cancer Metastasis by Genomic Stratification (ERADICATE) [NCT04484818]Phase 327 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-01Active, not recruiting
Effects of GnRHa on Ovarian Function Against Chemotherapy-induced-gonadotoxicity in Women With Breast Cancer in China [NCT02518191]Phase 3345 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-01Completed
Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy Plus Abiraterone With or Without Apalutamide for Patients With High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer Prior to Radical Prostatectomy [NCT02789878]Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-24Completed
Neoadjuvant Study of Targeting ROS1 in Combination With Endocrine Therapy in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast [NCT04551495]Phase 265 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-14Recruiting
Randomized Trial of External Beam Radiation With or Without Short-Course Hormonal Therapy in Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT00388804]Phase 339 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual.)
A Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant MK-2206 in Combination With Either Anastrozole if Postmenopausal or Anastrozole and Goserelin if Premenopausal in Women With Clinical Stage 2 or 3 PIK3CA Mutant Estrogen Receptor Positive and HER2 Negative Invasive Breast C [NCT01776008]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Study did not pass Stage 1 interim analysis.)
A Phase II Study of Ipilimumab PLUS Androgen Depravation Therapy in Castrate Sensitive Prostate Carcinoma [NCT01377389]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-17Terminated(stopped due to Due to adverse events)
A Randomized Phase II Study Of Bone-Targeted Therapy In Advanced Androgen-Dependent Prostate Cancer [NCT00081159]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Multidisciplinary Team-Based Approach to Mitigate the Impact of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Phase 2 [NCT02168062]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-16Terminated(stopped due to Funding)
An Open, Randomized, Two-way Cross-over Phase I Study to Compare the Bioavailability, Safety and Tolerability of Single s.c. Doses of 300 IU XM17 With 300 IU Gonal-f® in 36 Healthy, Down-regulated Young Women [NCT02592031]Phase 149 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
A Phase Ib Dose Escalation Study of the Combination of LEE011 With Letrozole and Dose Expansion of LEE011 With Hormonal Therapy for the Treatment of Pre-(With Goserelin) and Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2-negative, Advanced Brea [NCT02333370]Phase 188 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-04Completed
A Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Intermittent Versus Continuous Androgen Suppression for Patients With Prostate-Specific-Antigen Progression in the Clinical Absence of Distant Metastases Following Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer [NCT00003653]Phase 31,386 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-01-05Completed
Endocrine Treatment Alone as Primary Treatment for Elderly Patients With Estrogen Receptor Positive Operable Breast Cancer and Low Recurrence Score [NCT02476786]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-17Recruiting
Docetaxel Followed by Radical Prostatectomy in Patients With High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT01250717]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-01-31Completed
A Multisite International Collaborative Phase 2 Study of Neoadjuvant Goserelin and a Non-steroidal Aromatase Inhibitor for Premenopausal Women With Estrogen Receptor Positive HER2 Negative Clinical Stage 2 and 3 Breast Cancer [NCT01368263]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Due to funding source and lack of accrual)
Whole-Pelvic Radiotherapy With a Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Boost and Long-Term Androgen Deprivation for Unfavorable-Intermediate and High Risk Localized Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate. [NCT02064036]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-06Completed
QoL and Treatment Compliance for Pre-menopausal Patients With HR+ Breast Cancer Using GnRHa as Ovarian Function Suppression(OFS) Treatment in the Chinese Population: a Real-world Observational Investigation [NCT05122377]500 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-11-30Not yet recruiting
Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer - a Prospective Observational Study, PANnon ONCology (PANONC) Group Non-commercial Clinical Trial [NCT05131893]300 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2022-03-31Not yet recruiting
Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Combination of Gedatolisib (a Dual Inhibitor of PI3-K and mTOR) With Palbociclib and Faslodex in the Neoadjuvant Setting in Previously Untreated Patients With ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer [NCT02626507]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-01-31Active, not recruiting
STEEL: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Salvage Radiotherapy With Standard vs Enhanced Androgen Deprivation Therapy (With Enzalutamide) in Patients With Post-Prostatectomy PSA Recurrences With Aggressive Disease Features [NCT03809000]Phase 2188 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-15Active, not recruiting
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist for the Preservation of Ovarian Function During Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Breast Cancer [NCT02483767]Phase 398 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
A Phase II Immunotherapeutic Trial: Combination Androgen Ablative Therapy and CTLA-4 Blockade as a Treatment for Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT00170157]Phase 2112 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Ovarian Failure With Goserelin in Premenopausal Lymphoma Patients [NCT04536467]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-01Enrolling by invitation
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Clinical Relapse Rate (10 Years)
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Biochemical Failure Rate (10 Years)
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival Rate (10 Years)
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Disease-specific Survival Rate (10 Years)
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Distant Failure Rate (10 Years)
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Local Progression Rate (10 Years)
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rate (10-year)
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Positive Re-biopsy Rate at Two Years
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Second Biochemical Relapse Rate (10 Years)
NCT00002651 (6) [back to overview]Physical Functioning as Measured by the SF-36
NCT00002651 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00002651 (6) [back to overview]High Libido
NCT00002651 (6) [back to overview]Erectile Dysfunction
NCT00002651 (6) [back to overview]Emotional Functioning as Measured by the SF-36 Mental Health Inventory
NCT00002651 (6) [back to overview]Vitality
NCT00003645 (2) [back to overview]"Number of Wives of the Participants Having Better Than or Equal to a Good Quality of Life"
NCT00003645 (2) [back to overview]Quality of Life for Participants
NCT00004124 (3) [back to overview]Compare Qualitative and Quantitative Toxicities of These Regimens in These Patients
NCT00004124 (3) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival
NCT00004124 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00004635 (2) [back to overview]The Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00004635 (2) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00016913 (3) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT00016913 (3) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Failure
NCT00016913 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00028769 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00028769 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00028769 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through Grade 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
NCT00068601 (3) [back to overview]Rate of Ovarian Dysfunction at 1 Year
NCT00068601 (3) [back to overview]Rate of Premature Ovarian Failure at 2 Years
NCT00068601 (3) [back to overview]Rate of Ovarian Dysfunction at 2 Years
NCT00081159 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00081159 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00081159 (3) [back to overview]Major Bone Scan Response
NCT00108732 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With PSA Response
NCT00108732 (4) [back to overview]Difference Between Day 4 PSA Level and Day 15 PSA Level
NCT00108732 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Free of PSA Progression at 6 Months (Prior to the Start of Androgen Ablation)
NCT00108732 (4) [back to overview]The Difference Between PSA Slopes Before and After Treatment
NCT00114114 (5) [back to overview]Change in Erectile Function Symptoms
NCT00114114 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change in Bone Turnover Marker (Serum C-telopeptide, CTX)
NCT00114114 (5) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Body Composition: Fat Mass
NCT00114114 (5) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Thigh Muscle Area
NCT00114114 (5) [back to overview]Change in Libido / Sexual Desire
NCT00170157 (2) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Undetectable Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response
NCT00170157 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Progression-free at 18 Months
NCT00186121 (7) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate
NCT00186121 (7) [back to overview]Serious Adverse Events
NCT00186121 (7) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00186121 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00186121 (7) [back to overview]Time-to-Progression (TTP)
NCT00186121 (7) [back to overview]Estradiol Suppression
NCT00186121 (7) [back to overview]Response Rates
NCT00298155 (2) [back to overview]To Determine the Effects of Different Modes of Androgen Deprivation on Serum DHT
NCT00298155 (2) [back to overview]Prostate Tissue DHT
NCT00322348 (6) [back to overview]Oestradiol (E2) Serum Concentrations at Week 24
NCT00322348 (6) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) at Week 24
NCT00322348 (6) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (0-12 Weeks)
NCT00322348 (6) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration, Cmax (ng/mL)
NCT00322348 (6) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration, Tmax (Hours)
NCT00322348 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at Week 24
NCT00328614 (1) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of Samarium-153
NCT00388804 (1) [back to overview]Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Failures
NCT00429403 (1) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Response (FSH Level + Vaginal Bleeding)
NCT00430183 (2) [back to overview]5-year bPFS Rate
NCT00430183 (2) [back to overview]Proportion of Biochemical Progression-Free Survival (bPFS Proportion) at 3 Years
NCT00432172 (1) [back to overview]Clinical Response Rate
NCT00500110 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Pathological Complete Response
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Follow-up of the 8 Patients With Metastases Limited to Pelvic Lymph Nodes.
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]CR Without ADT in Patients With Metastases Limited to Pelvic Lymph Nodes.
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Count of Patients Remaining Off of Therapy
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Relapse
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Treatment Failure (no PSA Threshold Below 4 ng/dl, or no PSA Below Baseline Level Before LHRH Treatment).
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Patients Who Achieved PSA Nadir of < 0.2 at 36 Weeks.
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Length of Follow-up
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Late Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events > 90 Days From the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Mortality)
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Free From Hormone-refractory Disease (Castrate-resistant Disease)
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Free From Progression (FFP) at 5 Years
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Prostate Cancer (Cause-specific Mortality)
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Local Failure
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events ≤ 90 Days of the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Secondary Biochemical Failure (Alternative Biochemical Failure)
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Levels of Testosterone in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Levels of PSA in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Levels of DHT in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Levels of DHEA in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Gleason Score
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Levels of DHEA-S in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
NCT00605267 (17) [back to overview]Anastrozole Plasma Concentrations (Cmin)
NCT00605267 (17) [back to overview]Best Overall Response Rate (BORR) (Calliper)
NCT00605267 (17) [back to overview]Best Overall Response Rate (BORR) (MRI/CT)
NCT00605267 (17) [back to overview]Best Overall Response Rate (BORR) (US)
NCT00605267 (17) [back to overview]Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Cervical Thighbone
NCT00605267 (17) [back to overview]Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Lumbar Spine
NCT00605267 (17) [back to overview]Bone Turnover Marker (BAP) CLEIA Method
NCT00605267 (17) [back to overview]Bone Turnover Marker (BAP) EIA Method
NCT00605267 (17) [back to overview]Bone Turnover Marker (NTX)
NCT00605267 (17) [back to overview]Endocrine Subscale (ES)
NCT00605267 (17) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B)
NCT00605267 (17) [back to overview]Histopathological Response Rate (HRR)
NCT00605267 (17) [back to overview]Serum Oestradiol (E2) Concentrations
NCT00605267 (17) [back to overview]Serum Oestrone (E1) Concentrations
NCT00605267 (17) [back to overview]Oestrogen Receptor (ER) Status
NCT00605267 (17) [back to overview]Progesterone Receptor (PgR) Status
NCT00605267 (17) [back to overview]Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Status
NCT00669162 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Can Safely Tolerate and Complete Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy, Radiation Therapy and Docetaxel After a Radical Prostatectomy
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Maximum Urine Flow (Qmax) at Each Visit
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Related to Urinary Symptoms at Each Visit
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Residual Volume (Vresidual) at Each Visit
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Weeks 4 and 8
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Testosterone <=0.5 Nanograms/Milliliter at Each Visit
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Concentration at Each Visit
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Oestradiol Levels During the Study
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set)
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Per Protocol Analysis Set)
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Related to Urinary Symptoms at Each Visit
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels During the Study
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone Levels During the Study
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 4, 8, and 12
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on TRUS at Week 4 and 8
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Related to Urinary Symptoms at Each Visit
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 4, 8, and 12
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Change in Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels During the Study
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Change in Serum Testosterone Levels During the Study
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set)
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Per Protocol Analysis Set)
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Burden of Urinary Symptoms Based on the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPHII)
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Failed (Freedom From Failure)
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Receiving Salvage Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Late Grade 3+ Adverse Events
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Bowel Domain Score
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Acute Adverse Events
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Domain Score
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Domain Score
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Local Recurrence
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Urinary Domain Score
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Domain Score
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival) by Radiation Therapy Modality
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Dead Due to Cause Other Than Prostate Cancer (Non-Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality)
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival)
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Dead Due to Prostate Cancer (Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality)
NCT00937768 (4) [back to overview]Number of Deaths
NCT00937768 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Regardless of Attribution
NCT00937768 (4) [back to overview]Average LASA Overall Quality of Life at Baseline, Months 3 and 6
NCT00937768 (4) [back to overview]Average Overall FACT-P Total Score at Baseline, Months 3 and 6
NCT00946920 (6) [back to overview]Cumulative Probability of Testosterone at Castrate Level (≤0.5 ng/mL) With Degarelix
NCT00946920 (6) [back to overview]Difference in Cumulative Probability of Testosterone at Castrate Level (≤0.5 ng/mL) Between Degarelix and Goserelin
NCT00946920 (6) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Testosterone Over Time
NCT00946920 (6) [back to overview]Change in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL), as Measured by Short Form-36 (SF-36) Score at Month 10 and Month 13 Compared to Baseline
NCT00946920 (6) [back to overview]Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Score at Months 1, 4, 7, and 13 Compared to Baseline
NCT00946920 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change in Serum Levels of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Over Time
NCT01023061 (3) [back to overview]Levels of Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and Testosterone in Prostate Biopsy Sample Assessed by Mass Spectrometry
NCT01023061 (3) [back to overview]Median Time to Prostate Specific Antigen Progression
NCT01023061 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Acute and Chronic Grade 3 or Greater Toxicity as Evaluated Using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 3.0
NCT01073865 (3) [back to overview]Oestradiol (E2) Serum Concentrations at 24 Weeks
NCT01073865 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Progression-free Survival (PFS) at 24 Weeks
NCT01073865 (3) [back to overview]Number of Responders at 24 Weeks
NCT01076335 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Progression Free at 1 Year
NCT01088529 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Pathology Tumor Stage of Less Than or Equal to Prostate Cancer Stage at Which the Tumor is Confined to the Prostate (pT2)
NCT01088529 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Prostate-Specific Antigen Response
NCT01088529 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Positive Surgical Margin at Radical Prostatectomy
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Who do Not Achieve a Partial PSA Response
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Correlation of microRNA Measures With 28-week PSA Response
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Change in Level of Insulin
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Correlation of microRNA Measures With Baseline Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Counts
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Change in Level of IGFBP2, IGFBP3 and Growth Hormone
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Change in Level of IGF-I, Free IGF-I and C-peptide
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Undetectable PSA Rate
NCT01205685 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Tumor Response Per RECIST
NCT01205685 (3) [back to overview]Anti-tumor Activity of OSI-906
NCT01205685 (3) [back to overview]Safety Profile Based on Number of Patients With Each Worst-grade Toxicity
NCT01242748 (8) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) During 3 Years' Treatment With Degarelix or Goserelin
NCT01242748 (8) [back to overview]Hazard Ratio of Testosterone Escape Rates During 3 Years' Treatment Between Degarelix and Goserelin
NCT01242748 (8) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Testosterone During 3 Years' Treatment With Degarelix or Goserelin
NCT01242748 (8) [back to overview]Hazard Ratio of Mortality Rates During 3 Years' Treatment Between Degarelix and Goserelin
NCT01242748 (8) [back to overview]Hazard Ratio of PFS Failure Rates During 3 Years Treatment Between Degarelix and Goserelin
NCT01242748 (8) [back to overview]Hazard Ratio of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression-free Survival (PFS) Failure Rates During 3 Years' Treatment Between Degarelix and Goserelin
NCT01242748 (8) [back to overview]Hazard Ratio of PSA Failure Rates During 3 Years Treatment Between Degarelix and Goserelin
NCT01242748 (8) [back to overview]Hazard Ratio of the Rates of Introduction of Additional Therapy Related to Prostate Cancer During 3 Years' Treatment Between Degarelix and Goserelin
NCT01250717 (1) [back to overview]Pathologic Complete Response Was Assessed by Rigorous Pathological Examination by One of Two Pathologists
NCT01368263 (2) [back to overview]PEPI-0 Rate in Patients Whose Estradiol is Fully Suppressed (< or = 15 pg/mL) and Tumor Ki67 Level is 10% or Less
NCT01368263 (2) [back to overview]Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index Score (PEPI Score)
NCT01377389 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01377389 (6) [back to overview]The Number of Clonal Expansion of Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) T-cells
NCT01377389 (6) [back to overview]Time to Progression of Disease (PD) Off Androgen Depravation Therapy (ADT), After Treatment With Intermittent ADT Plus Ipilimumab.
NCT01377389 (6) [back to overview]Time to Testosterone Recovery (> 50ng/mL) in Patients Treated With Intermittent ADT Plus Ipilimumab.
NCT01377389 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Progressed After 7 Months of Being on Treatment
NCT01377389 (6) [back to overview]The Total Number of Study Drug Related Events Indicated by the Participants
NCT01496131 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With a Doubling in Number of T-cells in Tumor Biopsy From Baseline at Pre-radiotherapy (Pre-RT) and Post-radiotherapy (Post-RT)
NCT01496131 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Progression/Recurrence Status Based on Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Levels
NCT01496131 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Change From Baseline in the Mucinous Glycoprotein 1 (MUC1) Specific Systemic T-Cells Immune Response at Day 60 (Pre-Radiation)
NCT01496131 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With a Doubling in Number of T-cells in Tumor Biopsy From Baseline at Pre-radiotherapy (Pre-RT) and Post-radiotherapy (Post-RT)
NCT01496131 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Change From Baseline in the Mucinous Glycoprotein 1 (MUC1) Specific Systemic T-Cells Immune Response at Day 190 (Post-radiation)
NCT01531205 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Complete Response (CR)
NCT01531205 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Perioperative and Postoperative Morbidity
NCT01531205 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of PSA Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01531205 (5) [back to overview]Surgical Margin Negative Rate (SM Rate)
NCT01531205 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Detecting Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC)
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Hemoglobin A1c
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Clinical Survivorship Events
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Serum High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Serum High-density Lipoprotein (LDL)
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Serum Testosterone
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Testosterone Recovery at 12 and 24 Months
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol)
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form at One Year
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Median Testosterone Recovery Time
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Death Due to Prostate Cancer
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastases
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With General Clinical Treatment Failure
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Local Progression
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Alive [Overall Survival] (Primary Endpoint of Original Protocol)
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One Year
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Fasting Total Cholesterol
NCT01673984 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Maintaining Biochemical Castration
NCT01673984 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Patient Satisfaction With Medication Using Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM Version II)
NCT01673984 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Demonstrating Stable Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Levels
NCT01673984 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Using EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels [EQ-5D-5L] Questionnaire.
NCT01673984 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Maintaining Biochemical Castration After 12 Months of Treatment.
NCT01673984 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Changed Injection Frequency After Completion of the Study
NCT01674140 (4) [back to overview]Distant Recurrence-Free Survival (DRFS)
NCT01674140 (4) [back to overview]Toxicity Based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0, Assessed up to 10 Years.
NCT01674140 (4) [back to overview]Invasive Disease-Free Survival (IDFS)
NCT01674140 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01682642 (7) [back to overview]Number of Cryopreserved Embryos
NCT01682642 (7) [back to overview]Good Embryo Quality
NCT01682642 (7) [back to overview]Total Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Dose
NCT01682642 (7) [back to overview]Pregnancy Rate
NCT01682642 (7) [back to overview]Number of Pro Nuclear Cell (2PN)
NCT01682642 (7) [back to overview]Number of Metaphase II Cells (MII)
NCT01682642 (7) [back to overview]Number of Days of Stimulation
NCT01723774 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Cell Cycle Arrest at Cycle 1 Day 15 ( PIK3CA Mutant Type Cohort Only)
NCT01723774 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a PEPI-0 Score
NCT01723774 (12) [back to overview]Clinical Response Rate
NCT01723774 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Cell Cycle Arrest at Cycle 1 Day 15 (Endocrine Resistant Cohort Only)
NCT01723774 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Cell Cycle Arrest at Cycle 1 Day 15 (PIK3CA Wild Type Cohort Only)
NCT01723774 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)
NCT01723774 (12) [back to overview]Change in Ki67 Level of Tumor Specimens
NCT01723774 (12) [back to overview]Radiologic Response Rate
NCT01723774 (12) [back to overview]Safety Profile of Study Therapy During Adjuvant Therapy as Measured by Frequency and Grade of Adverse Event
NCT01723774 (12) [back to overview]Safety of PD 0332991 in Combination in Anastrozole as Measured by Frequency and Grade of Related Adverse Events
NCT01723774 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Cell Cycle Arrest
NCT01723774 (12) [back to overview]Change in Ki67 Level of Tumor Specimens
NCT01750398 (7) [back to overview]Radiographic or Clinical Progression
NCT01750398 (7) [back to overview]Quality of Life Survey
NCT01750398 (7) [back to overview]Complete PSA Response
NCT01750398 (7) [back to overview]Change in Weight
NCT01750398 (7) [back to overview]Patients With PSA <4 ng/mL at the End of the Study
NCT01750398 (7) [back to overview]Change in C-telopeptides
NCT01750398 (7) [back to overview]Change in Waist Circumference
NCT01776008 (2) [back to overview]Pathological Complete Response Rate
NCT01776008 (2) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events, Based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0
NCT02003209 (5) [back to overview]Median Percentage of Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes (sTILS)
NCT02003209 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Patients With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast and Post Therapy Lymph Nodes by Menopausal Status
NCT02003209 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Toxicity Categorized According to National Cancer Institute CTCAE Version 4.0
NCT02003209 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Patients With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast and Post Therapy Lymph Nodes
NCT02003209 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Patients With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]The Percentage of Patients Responding
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Bone Metastases Progression Free at Six Months
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Progression-free at 6 Months
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Progression Free at One Year
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 2 Years
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With PSA Remission Assessed Using the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2) Criteria
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Achievement of PSA Response Assessed Using PCWG2 Criteria
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]The Number of Participants With a CTC Response
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Achievement of Measurable Disease Response
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Achieve a PSA ≤ 4ng/mL After Seven Months of Protocol Treatment in Each Arm
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade >=3 Adverse Events That Are Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related to Study Treatment
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Therapy
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Biochemical Progression-free Survival Rate
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Frequency of Treatment Delay
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Frequency of Dose Modification
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Clinical Progression-free Survival Rate
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Who Achieve Undetectable PSA (<0.2ng/mL)
NCT02115282 (9) [back to overview]Patient-reported Nausea and Anorexia
NCT02115282 (9) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT02115282 (9) [back to overview]Time-to-treatment Deterioration (TTD)
NCT02115282 (9) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02115282 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02115282 (9) [back to overview]Patient-reported Diarrhea
NCT02115282 (9) [back to overview]Patient-reported Fatigue
NCT02115282 (9) [back to overview]Patient-reported Health-related Quality of Life
NCT02115282 (9) [back to overview]Lysine Acetylation Change in CD45 Blood Mononuclear Cells Between C1D1 and C1D15 and PFS in Patients on Arm A
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Last Question on International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Scores (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Insulin Resistance Score (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Attention Function Index (AFI) Scores (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Average Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) as Measured by an Ambulatory Accelerometer Assessment (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Body Weight (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Hemoglobin A1c (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Percentage Body Fat Mass as Measured by Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Percentage of Body Fat (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Serum 25-(OH) Vitamin D (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants in the Non-randomized, Pilot, Cohort Who Completed Clinic Visits
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Blood Pressure (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Bone Density T-score (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26) Scores to Assess Erectile and Urinary Function (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Fasting Lipids (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Hours Per Week of Physical Activity Category as Measured by the Exercise Pattern Assessment (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Lee Fatigue Scale Scores (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in the 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Assessment Item Scores for Patients in the Randomized Cohort
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale Score (HFRDIS) (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Waist Circumference (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02278120 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Local Assessment
NCT02278120 (5) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
NCT02278120 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) Per Investigator's Assessment - Patients With Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
NCT02278120 (5) [back to overview]Time to Response (TTR) Per Local Investigator's Assessment
NCT02278120 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Investigator's Assessment
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Time to Radiographic Progression
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Scores, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P) and Sexual Health in Men (SHIM)
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Change in Markers of Inflammation, as Measured by Circulating Hs-CRP
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Change in Bone Turnover Markers, as Measured by Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Change in Bone Turnover Markers as Measured by N-telopeptide
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Change in Bone Density
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events, Using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.1
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Metabolic Syndrome Incidence, Summarized by the Number of Patients With at Least 3 of the 5 Pre-specified Criteria
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Change in Physical Function, as Measured by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Metabolic Syndrome Incidence, Summarized by the Proportion of Patients With at Least 3 of the 5 Pre-specified Criteria
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients With PSA Progression
NCT02430480 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Positive Erythroblast Transformation-specific (ETS)-Related Gene (ERG) Protein Overexpression
NCT02430480 (11) [back to overview]Median Nuclear Androgen Receptor (AR) Level in Biopsy Specimens Versus Residual Tumors
NCT02430480 (11) [back to overview]Median Prostate Lesion Volume Before and After Treatment
NCT02430480 (11) [back to overview]Median Tumor Volume Burden at Baseline Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Before and After Surgery
NCT02430480 (11) [back to overview]Initial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Percentage of Relative Tumor Volume Sensitivity
NCT02430480 (11) [back to overview]Initial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Percentage of Relative Tumor Volume Specificity
NCT02430480 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Complete Response
NCT02430480 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Reduction in Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog (PTEN) Levels
NCT02430480 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)
NCT02430480 (11) [back to overview]Any Grade 1 Adverse Events in More Than One Patient and Grades 2 -3 Attributable to Research
NCT02430480 (11) [back to overview]Number of Prostate Lesions Detected Within the Study Population at Baseline Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) and 6 Months After Enzalutamide Plus Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)
NCT02518191 (2) [back to overview]Survival Rate
NCT02518191 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Premature Ovarian Insufficiency
NCT02586675 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) at Six Months
NCT02586675 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Six Months
NCT02586675 (3) [back to overview]Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D)
NCT02907918 (3) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability of Palbociclib in Combination With Neoadjuvant Letrozole and Trastuzumab (or FDA Approved Biosimilar) as Measured by Number of Participants With Grade 3 & 4 Adverse Events
NCT02907918 (3) [back to overview]Change in Patient Reported Outcomes as Measured by NCI PRO-CTCAE
NCT02907918 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]Time-to-Progression (TTP) Based on Investigator's Assessment (Core Phase)
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) Based on Investigator's Assessment (Core Phase)
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Based on Investigator's Assessment (Core Phase)
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) Score (Core Phase)
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]All Collected Deaths
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]Canadian Sub-study: Proteomic Analysis of Ribociclib and Letrozole Cohort Not Achieving Clinical Benefit Compared to a Cohort Sensitive to Treatment With Ribociclib and Letrozole
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) During Treatment With Ribociclib + Letrozole in the Core Phase
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs in the Extension Phase
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Extension Phase)
NCT03007979 (1) [back to overview]Rate of Grade 3 or Higher Neutropenia
NCT03096847 (12) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) for Different Populations - Median Time to Progression or Death With 95% CI [Months]
NCT03096847 (12) [back to overview]Time to 10% Deterioration in EORTC Global Health Status
NCT03096847 (12) [back to overview]All Collected Deaths
NCT03096847 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 of Patient Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Via EORTC QLQ-C30
NCT03096847 (12) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) in Women and Men With Hormone Receptor Positiv, HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer Treated With Ribocilib and Letrozole
NCT03096847 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
NCT03096847 (12) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) - Kaplan-Meier Estimates (%, 95% CI)
NCT03096847 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) - Number of Censored Participants and Number of Deaths
NCT03096847 (12) [back to overview]Patient Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Via EORTC BR-23 - Change From Baseline at Week 24 (Cycle 7)
NCT03096847 (12) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) for Different Populations - Kaplan-Meier Estimates (%, 95% CI)
NCT03096847 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) - Kaplan-Meier Estimates (%, 95% CI)
NCT03096847 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) - Median Time to Progression or Death With 95% CI [Months]
NCT04478266 (17) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival on Next Line of Therapy (PFS2)
NCT04478266 (17) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT04478266 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
NCT04478266 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit
NCT04478266 (17) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT04478266 (17) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT04478266 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
NCT04478266 (17) [back to overview]12-month Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate
NCT04478266 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Breast Cancer Specific Module (EORTC-QLQ-BR23) Domain Scores
NCT04478266 (17) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Plasma Concentrations of Palbociclib
NCT04478266 (17) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Plasma Concentrations of Amcenestrant
NCT04478266 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Liver Function Abnormalities of Grade 3 and 4 During the Treatment Period
NCT04478266 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities During the Treatment Period
NCT04478266 (17) [back to overview]Time to First Chemotherapy
NCT04478266 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) Domain Scores
NCT04478266 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Breast Cancer Specific Module (EORTC QLQ-BR45) Domain Scores
NCT04478266 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health Utility Index Value Score

Clinical Relapse Rate (10 Years)

Clinical relapse is defined as local progression or distant metastases. Failure rates were estimated by means of cumulative incidence functions. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From registration to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy15.0
Radiation Therapy Alone21.7

[back to top]

Biochemical Failure Rate (10 Years)

The Phoenix definition of biochemical failure was used - an increase in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >2 ng per milliliter above the nadir. Failure rates were estimated by means of cumulative incidence functions. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From registration to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy26.3
Radiation Therapy Alone41.1

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival Rate (10 Years)

Disease-free failure is defined as documentation of progression (local progression, distant failure, and biochemical failure) or death from any cause. Disease-free survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From registration to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy51.7
Radiation Therapy Alone39.5

[back to top]

Disease-specific Survival Rate (10 Years)

Disease-specific failure is defined as death certified as due to prostate cancer (by central review), death due to complications of treatment (irrespective of malignancy status), death from unknown causes with active malignancy, or death from unknown causes with previously documented relapse (either clinical or biochemical). Survival rates were estimated by means of cumulative incidence functions. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From registration to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy95.7
Radiation Therapy Alone92.6

[back to top]

Distant Failure Rate (10 Years)

Failure is defined as documented metastatic disease. Failure rates were estimated by means of cumulative incidence functions. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From registration to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy5.5
Radiation Therapy Alone8.0

[back to top]

Local Progression Rate (10 Years)

Local progression defined as documented local progression as determined by clinical exam . Failure rates were estimated by means of cumulative incidence functions. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From registration to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy10.9
Radiation Therapy Alone16.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rate (10-year)

Overall survival (OS) was calculated from randomization to the date of death from any cause and overall survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy61.9
Radiation Therapy Alone56.8

[back to top]

Positive Re-biopsy Rate at Two Years

The rate of prostate rebiopsy at two years is defined as the proportion of patients whose results are positive among all eligible patients who had a repeat biopsy at two years. The rate was estimated separately in each arm. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From registration to two years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy20.2
Radiation Therapy Alone38.9

[back to top]

Second Biochemical Relapse Rate (10 Years)

Second biochemical relapse is as defined as follows (after initiation of salvage hormone therapy): A rise in PSA on at least two consecutive cases above the nadir (after initiation of salvage hormone therapy), with the rises in PSA exceeding 1 ng/ml above the nadir; or failure to reach 4 ng/L or less at 18 months. The rates of second biochemical relapse were estimated by means of cumulative incidence functions. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From registration to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy2.7
Radiation Therapy Alone6.1

[back to top]

Physical Functioning as Measured by the SF-36

This outcome was scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning. Change from Baseline in SF-36 Score at 3 Months (NCT00002651)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Continuous Hormonal Therapy-1.74
Intermittent Hormonal Therapy0.09

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Non-inferiority test to determine if intermittent combined androgen deprivation (CAD) overall survival is not substantially worse than continuous CAD overall survival. Specifically, the trial is designed for a one-sided test of the hypothesis that the hazard ratio of intermittent CAD to continuous CAD is 1.2. The assumptions used to compute the trial size are an overall type I error rate of 0.05 and a type II error of 0.10 (power = 0.9). (NCT00002651)
Timeframe: Up to 15 years

Interventionyears (Median)
Consolidation Arm I5.8
Consolidation Arm II5.1

[back to top]

High Libido

"This outcome was assessed by having patients report whether their interest in sexual activities was very high, high, or moderate (a score of 1) or low or very low (a score of 0). This outcome measure is reporting a change from baseline in the percentage of participants with High Libido at 3 months. High Libido is defined as very high, high or moderate interest in sexual activities." (NCT00002651)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Continuous Hormonal Therapy-2
Intermittent Hormonal Therapy16

[back to top]

Erectile Dysfunction

This outcome was assessed by having patients report whether they had erectile dysfunction (a score of 1) or no erectile dysfunction (a score of 0). This analysis looks at change from Baseline to 3 Months. (NCT00002651)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Continuous Hormonal Therapy2
Intermittent Hormonal Therapy-7

[back to top]

Emotional Functioning as Measured by the SF-36 Mental Health Inventory

This outcome was scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning. Change from Baseline in SF-36 Score at 3 Months (NCT00002651)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Continuous Hormonal Therapy-0.95
Intermittent Hormonal Therapy1.92

[back to top]

Vitality

This outcome was scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning. This analysis looks at mean change from Baseline score to 3 Months. (NCT00002651)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Continuous Hormonal Therapy-1.42
Intermittent Hormonal Therapy-0.11

[back to top]

"Number of Wives of the Participants Having Better Than or Equal to a Good Quality of Life"

To measure the differences in quality of life between wives of participants in the androgen ablation condition compared to wives of patients in the control condition by using quality of life assessments. The following questionnaires were completed in the clinic setting and used to assess Health related (HRQoL): Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36), University of California-Los Angeles Sexual Function Scale (UCLA-SFS), and Southwest Oncology Group Treatment-Specific Symptoms Scale (SWOG-TSSS). The SF-36 was analysed using a composite score for each of physical health and mental health. SF-36, UCLA-SFS, SWOGTSSS were combined to classify participants' quality of life. (NCT00003645)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A19
Arm B24

[back to top]

Quality of Life for Participants

To determine the impact of one year of total androgen ablation on quality of life mentally, physically and sexual function. The following questionnaires were completed by patients in the clinic setting and used to assess HRQoL: Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) and University of California-Los Angeles Sexual Function Scale (UCLA-SFS). To score the SF-36, scales are standardized with a scoring algorithm or by the SF-36v2 scoring software to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. (NCT00003645)
Timeframe: 1 year

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
MentalPhysicalSexual Function
Arm I - Leuprolide + Flutamide55495
Arm II - No Treatment544928

[back to top]

Compare Qualitative and Quantitative Toxicities of These Regimens in These Patients

Number of patients with adverse events that are related to study drug (NCT00004124)
Timeframe: Up to 22 months from registration

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Abdominal pain/crampingAbscessAlkaline phosphatase increaseAllergic reactionAllergic rhinitisAlopeciaAnal incontinenceAnemiaAnorexiaAnxiety/agitationApneaArrhythmia, NOSArthralgiaArthritisAtaxia (incoordination)Bilirubin increaseBlurred visionBone painBruisingCPK increaseCardiac ischemia/infarctionCardiovascular-otherCataractCerebrovascular ischemiaChest pain,not cardio or pleurConduction abnormality/blockConfusionConjunctivitisConstipation/bowel obstructionCoughCreatinine increaseCushingoid appearanceDehydrationDepressionDiarrhea without colostomyDizziness/light headednessDry eyeDry skinDysmenorrheaDyspepsia/heartburnDyspneaDysuriaEar-otherEdemaEndocrine-otherEpistaxisErectile impotenceEryth/rash/eruption/desq, NOSEsophagitis/dysphagiaEye-otherFatigue/malaise/lethargyFebrile neutropeniaFeminization of maleFever without neutropeniaFever, NOSFlatulenceFlu-like symptoms-otherFlushingGGT increaseGI Mucositis, NOSGI-otherGU-otherGastritisGastritis/ulcer, NOSGlaucomaGynecomastiaHeadacheHematologic-otherHematuriaHemolysisHemoptysisHemorrhage-otherHiccoughsHot flashesHypercalcemiaHypercholesterolemiaHyperglycemiaHyperkalemiaHypermagnesemiaHypernatremiaHypertensionHypertriglyceridemiaHypoalbuminemiaHypocalcemiaHypoglycemiaHypokalemiaHypomagnesemiaHyponatremiaHypotensionHypothyroidismHypoxiaIncontinenceInfection w/o 3-4 neutropeniaInfection with 3-4 neutropeniaInfection, unk ANCInner ear-hearing lossInsomniaInvol. movement/restlessnessJoint,muscle,bone-otherLVEF decrease/CHFLeukopeniaLibido lossLocal injection site reactionLung-otherLymphopeniaMale infertilityMelena/ GI bleedingMemory lossMetabolic-otherMiddle ear-hearing loss/otitisMood/consciousness change, NOSMouth drynessMuscle weakness (not neuro)MyalgiaMyalgia/arthralgia, NOSMyocarditisNail changesNauseaNeuro-otherNeuropathic painNeutropenia/granulocytopeniaPRBC transfusionPain-otherPalpitationsPelvic painPericar. effusion/pericarditisPersonality/behavioral changePhlebitisPigmentation changes/yellowingPleural effusionsPneumonitis/infiltratesProctitisProteinuriaPruritusRT-GI mucositis, NOSRT-focal dermatitis, NOSRT-late bladder morbidityRT-late intestinal morbidityRT-painRash/desquamationRectal bleeding/hematocheziaRectal/perirectal painRespiratory infect w/o neutropRespiratory infection, unk ANCRigors/chillsSGOT (AST) increaseSGPT (ALT) increaseSalivary change, NOSSecond primarySeizuresSensory neuropathySexual/reproductive-otherSinus bradycardiaSkin-otherSpeech impairmentStomatitis/pharyngitisSupraventricular arrhythmiaSurgery-wound infectionSweatingSyncopeTaste disturbanceTearingThrombocytopeniaThrombosis/embolismTremorTroponin T (cTnT) increaseUrinary frequency/urgencyUrinary retentionUrinary tr infect w/ neutropUrinary tr infect w/o neutropUrinary tr infection, unk ANCUrine color changeUrticariaVentricular arrhythmiaVertigoVision,NOSVoice change/stridor/larynxVomitingWeakness (motor neuropathy)Weight gainWeight loss
Arm I: Bicalutamide + Goserelin19011129125275210431715319101051111605710700805533111072114040301810212580101225101292021403719001043945440003821108133208850137921101416311042015002105526104265011011219012000043130312146127117422200137201105001380103200861301333110010317912
Arm II: Mitoxantrone + Prednisone + Bivalutamid + Goserelin411115161312141416211641712063414215601901441173417868575715281444911256221462136357209636401020901010082113114442252784143806711112110471102429222783171331724932121131377451215720541239312761111153114123110106310578244226161571411149211293466355211017122444011651615129

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival

Measured from date of randomization to date of first observation of recurrence or death due to any cause. Patients without recurrence are censored at date of last contact. (NCT00004124)
Timeframe: at 10 Years

Interventionpercentage of probability of survival (Number)
Arm I: Bicalutamide + Goserelin72
Arm II: Mitoxantrone + Prednisone + Bivalutamid + Goserelin72

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Measured from date of randomization to date of death from any cause. Patient known to be alive are censored at date of last contact. (NCT00004124)
Timeframe: at 10 Years

Interventionpercentage of probability of survival (Number)
Arm I: Bicalutamide + Goserelin87
Arm II: Mitoxantrone + Prednisone + Bivalutamid + Goserelin86

[back to top]

The Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Here are the total number of participants with adverse events. For the detailed list of adverse events see the adverse event module. (NCT00004635)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 60 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Thalidomide117
Placebo98

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Time to progression is defined as follows: if the PSA returns to baseline (defined as the PSA value prior to starting leuprolide or goserelin) or increases to the absolute value of 5 ng/ml. (NCT00004635)
Timeframe: 36 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Thalidomide15
Placebo9.6

[back to top]

Toxicity

Patients were evaluated for acute toxicities defined as grade 3 or greater cardiovascular (including venous thrombosis), gastrointestinal, or genitourinary toxicity occurring during the period starting from treatment initiation until 90 days or less after the completion of radiotherapy. The same toxicity measures were monitored at >90 days after the completion of radiotherapy. (NCT00016913)
Timeframe: 90 days and 1 year post treatment

InterventionEvents (Number)
Grade 3+ Toxicity <=90 days post radiotherapyGrade 3+ Toxicity >90 days post radiotherapy
Neo-Adj ChemoTx + Ablation Prior to RT20

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Failure

PSA progression was defined in 2 ways. The CALGB PSA progression was defined as 2 consecutive rises in PSA with a rise of at least 0.2 ng/mL and above 1.0 ng/mL after radiation therapy; the date of PSA failure is taken as the midpoint between the last PSA before the rise and the first of the 2 PSAs that documented the rise. In addition, PSA progression was used according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology 1996 (ASTRO) criteria and defined as 3 consecutive rises in PSA after radiation therapy. The date of PSA failure was taken as the midpoint between the time of the lowest PSA measure after irradiation and the first of the 3 consecutive rises. (NCT00016913)
Timeframe: PSA was measured every 4 weeks during chemotherapy, at least every 12 weeks post radiation for 2 years, and every 6 months thereafter until PSA failure date (Up to 5.5 years).

Interventionmonths (Median)
CALGB criteriaASTRO criteria
Neo-Adj ChemoTx + Ablation Prior to RT17.112.1

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time between treatment initiation and the date of disease progression (PSA, bone, tumor) or death, whichever occurred first. PSA progression is defined as 2 consecutive rising PSAs (a rise of at least 0.2 ng/mL) above 1.0 ng/mL. (NCT00016913)
Timeframe: registration to progression, up to 5.5 years from registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Neo-Adj ChemoTx + Ablation Prior to RT12.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined from the date of registration to date of death from any cause (NCT00028769)
Timeframe: 0-5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
CAD + Chemo38

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Measured from time of registration to time of first documentation of progression determined from the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, clinical criteria, or symptomatic deterioration. PSA progression is defined as a 25% increase greater than baseline. If the patient's PSA level had decrease during the study, a 25% increase from the nadir PSA level, with absolute value of >=5 ng/mL is considered progression. CLinical progress is defined as the appearance of any new lesion at any site or death without documented progression. Symptomatic deterioration is defined as a global deterioration of the health status requiring discontinuation of treatment without objective evidence of progression. (NCT00028769)
Timeframe: 0-5 years (assessed every 3 months if no progression when the chemotherapy had been finished. Once off chemotherapy, assessed every 3 months until progression)

Interventionmonths (Median)
CAD + Chemo13

[back to top] [back to top]

Rate of Ovarian Dysfunction at 1 Year

Ovarian dysfunction is defined as amenorrhea for the preceding three months and the presence of FSH, estradiol and/or inhibin B levels in the postmenopausal range. (NCT00068601)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard Chemotherapy28
Chemotherapy Plus Goserelin18

[back to top]

Rate of Premature Ovarian Failure at 2 Years

Ovarian failure at two years is defined as amenorrhea (absence of menstrual bleeding) for the preceding six months AND the presence of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in the post-menopausal range. (NCT00068601)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard Chemotherapy15
Chemotherapy Plus Goserelin5

[back to top]

Rate of Ovarian Dysfunction at 2 Years

Ovarian dysfunction is defined as amenorrhea for the preceding three months and the presence of FSH, estradiol and/or inhibin B levels in the postmenopausal range. (NCT00068601)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard Chemotherapy22
Chemotherapy Plus Goserelin9

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Study's primary endpoint of PFS duration/time to progression was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first evidence of disease progression or patient death. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression is usually the first evidence of progression. PSA progression is defined as a 25% increase over the baseline or the nadir provided that the increase is a minimum of 1 ng/ml. (NCT00081159)
Timeframe: Up to 90 months with evaulation in 4 week intervals for up to 6 months of treatment, then follow up until disease progression

InterventionMonths (Median)
HAT, Doxorubicin, Zoledronate + Strontium Chloride12.9
HAT, Doxorubicin + Zoledronate18.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival defined as the length of time from the start of treatment till time that participants are still alive. (NCT00081159)
Timeframe: Up to 90 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
HAT, Doxorubicin, Zoledronate + Strontium Chloride47.4
HAT, Doxorubicin + Zoledronate53.5

[back to top]

Major Bone Scan Response

Bone scan performed at baseline and at Week 13 provided if baseline scan was positive for metastases. A major bone scan response was considered with a substantial resolution of participant bone metastases on the bone scans, i.e. complete resolution of the osseous metastases on the bone scan. (NCT00081159)
Timeframe: Week 13

Interventionparticipants (Number)
HAT, Doxorubicin, Zoledronate + Strontium Chloride0
HAT, Doxorubicin + Zoledronate0

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With PSA Response

"PSA response is defined as complete biochemical response or partial response.~Complete Response:~A PSA < 0.2 ng/mL confirmed by a repeat PSA one month later is considered a complete biochemical response for patients with prior radical prostatectomy. A PSA < 1 ng/mL on three separate occasions taken at least one month apart is considered a complete biochemical response in patients with radiation therapy only.~Partial Response:~A reduction in PSA by > 50% from baseline, confirmed by repeat PSA 1 month later." (NCT00108732)
Timeframe: Assessed monthly during the first 24 weeks and then every 3 months for a maximum total of 24 months

InterventionProportion of patients (Number)
Vaccinia/Fowlpox/GM-CSF0

[back to top]

Difference Between Day 4 PSA Level and Day 15 PSA Level

PSA level was assessed on Day 4 and Day 15 of cycle 1, and a comparison between the two measurements was done. (NCT00108732)
Timeframe: Assessed at day 4 and day 15 of cycle 1

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Vaccinia/Fowlpox/GM-CSF0.45

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Free of PSA Progression at 6 Months (Prior to the Start of Androgen Ablation)

"For patients who achieved a > 50% decline in PSA, an increase in PSA value by 50% over the nadir, confirmed by a second PSA two weeks later is considered progressive disease. The PSA rise must be at least 5 ng/mL or back to pretreatment baseline, whichever is greater.~Changes in PSA below 5 ng/mL will not be considered assessable for progression.~For patients whose PSA has not decreased by 50%, an increase in PSA value > 50% of baseline (on trial) or nadir PSA, whichever is lower, confirmed by a repeat PSA two weeks later is considered progressive disease. The PSA must have risen by at least 5 ng/mL." (NCT00108732)
Timeframe: Assessed at 6 months

InterventionProportion of patients (Number)
Vaccinia/Fowlpox/GM-CSF0.625

[back to top]

The Difference Between PSA Slopes Before and After Treatment

PSA slopes were assessed by multiple PSA values obtained prior to registration and during treatment. Only patients who completed at least 3 months of treatment were included in this analysis. The PSA slopes were calculated by a piecewise linear model using the three or four PSA values obtained prior to registration and PSA measurements obtained every 4 weeks for the first six months of treatment. Natural log transformed PSA levels were used in this analysis, and the difference between PSA slopes before and after treatment was calculated. (NCT00108732)
Timeframe: Assessed monthly during the first 24 weeks and then every 3 months for a maximum total of 24 months

Interventionlog PSA/month (Median)
Vaccinia/Fowlpox/GM-CSF-0.04

[back to top]

Change in Erectile Function Symptoms

Based on International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scale, question #15, which asked subjects to rate their confidence that they could achieve and maintain an erection. Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores being better. (NCT00114114)
Timeframe: Baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Group 1: 0 g/Day-1.4
Group 2: 1.25 g/Day-0.5
Group 3: 2.5 g/Day-0.2
Group 4: 5 g/Day-0.1
Group 5: 10* g/Day0.2
Group 6: PBO/PBO-0.3

[back to top]

Percent Change in Bone Turnover Marker (Serum C-telopeptide, CTX)

(NCT00114114)
Timeframe: Baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Group 1: 0 g/Day103
Group 2: 1.25 g/Day41
Group 3: 2.5 g/Day29
Group 4: 5 g/Day15
Group 5: 10* g/Day4
Group 6: Placebo/Placebo (PBO/PBO)11

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Body Composition: Fat Mass

(NCT00114114)
Timeframe: Baseline and 16 weeks

InterventionPercentage change (Mean)
Group 1: 0 g/Day9.8
Group 2: 1.25 g/Day5.7
Group 3: 2.5 g/Day1.9
Group 4: 5 g/Day0.4
Group 5: 10* g/Day-1.6
Group 6: PBO/PBO2.3

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Thigh Muscle Area

Assessed by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) (NCT00114114)
Timeframe: Baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Group 1: 0 g/Day-1.5
Group 2: 1.25 g/Day-1.6
Group 3: 2.5 g/Day-0.4
Group 4: 5 g/Day-0.5
Group 5: 10* g/Day0.5
Group 6: PBO/PBO-0.9

[back to top]

Change in Libido / Sexual Desire

Change in libido from baseline (scale ranges from -2 to +2), with -2 being much less, -1 somewhat less, 0 same, +1 somewhat more, +2 much more (NCT00114114)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Group 1: 0 g/Day-1.6
Group 2: 1.25 g/Day-0.6
Group 3: 2.5 g/Day-0.6
Group 4: 5 g/Day-0.2
Group 5: 10* g/Day0
Group 6: PBO/PBO-0.3

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Undetectable Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response

Percent of participants who had undetectable PSA at 3 months on the initially assigned treatment arm (prior to crossing over). (NCT00170157)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Androgen Ablative (AA) Therapy + MDX-01055
Androgen Ablative (AA) Then AA Therapy + MDX-01039

[back to top]

Number of Participants Progression-free at 18 Months

PSA progression is defined as a rise in PSA to >4.0 ng/mL demonstrated twice in measurements taken two weeks apart. (NCT00170157)
Timeframe: 18 months from the start of AA therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Entire Study Population0

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate

"The overall clinical benefit rate of goserelin followed by anastrozole was evaluated, as determined as the sum of the Complete Response (CR) rate + Partial Response (PR) rate + Stable Disease (SD) rate.~CR = Complete disappearance of all clinically- or pathologically-detectable malignant disease for at least 4 weeks.~PR = ≥ 50% decrease in tumor size for at least 4 weeks, without any new lesion or any ≥ 25% increase in size of any lesion.~SD = No significant change in measurable or evaluable disease for at least 4 weeks.~All measurements by ruler or calipers." (NCT00186121)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Anastrozole + Goserelin71.9

[back to top]

Serious Adverse Events

The toxicity of the treatment regimen of goserelin followed by anastrozole is estimated by the rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) that occurred during the course of the study. (NCT00186121)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionSerious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Number)
Anastrozole + Goserelin0

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

"ORR was determined as the sum of the Complete Response (CR) rate + Partial Response (PR) rates.~CR = Complete disappearance of all clinically- or pathologically-detectable malignant disease for at least 4 weeks.~PR = ≥ 50% decrease in tumor size for at least 4 weeks, without any new lesion or any ≥ 25% increase in size of any lesion.~All measurements by ruler or calipers." (NCT00186121)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Anastrozole + Goserelin37.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) was assessed as the median observed in the participants receiving goserelin followed by anastrozole. (NCT00186121)
Timeframe: up to 63 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Anastrozole + GoserelinNA

[back to top]

Time-to-Progression (TTP)

"Time-to-progression (TTP) was assessed as the median observed in the participant group.~Progression of disease was considered, per protocol, to be ≤ 25% increase in the area of any malignant lesion greater than 2 square cm, or ≤ 25% increase in the sum of the products of the longest perpendicular diameters of individual lesions in a given organ, when compared to baseline values or after therapeutic response." (NCT00186121)
Timeframe: up to 63 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Anastrozole + Goserelin8.3

[back to top]

Estradiol Suppression

Plasma estradiol determinations were performed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months using the Coat-A-Count Estradiol competitive binding assay system, which has a calibrated range for estradiol of 20 to 3,600 pg/mL with an analytical sensitivity of 10 pg/mL. (NCT00186121)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpg/mL estradiol (Mean)
Mean at BaselineMean at 1 month treatmentMean at 3 months treatmentMean at 6 months treatment
Anastrozole + Goserelin74.720.818.714.8

[back to top]

Response Rates

"The numbers of participants with metastatic breast cancer experiencing Complete Response (CR); Partial Response (PR); or Stable Disease (SD) after treatment with goserelin followed by anastrozole are reported.~CR = Complete disappearance of all clinically- or pathologically-detectable malignant disease for at least 4 weeks.~PR = ≥ 50% decrease in tumor size for at least 4 weeks, without any new lesion or any ≥ 25% increase in size of any lesion.~SD = No significant change in measurable or evaluable disease for at least 4 weeks.~All measurements by ruler or calipers." (NCT00186121)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)
Anastrozole + Goserelin11111

[back to top]

To Determine the Effects of Different Modes of Androgen Deprivation on Serum DHT

Serum DHT (NCT00298155)
Timeframe: After 12 weeks of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Group 14.2
Group 23.6
Group 35.7

[back to top]

Prostate Tissue DHT

Tissue dihydrotesterone (DHT) (NCT00298155)
Timeframe: After 12 weeks of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation

Interventionng/g (Mean)
Group 10.03
Group 20.06
Group 30.03

[back to top]

Oestradiol (E2) Serum Concentrations at Week 24

A comparison of mean E2 serum concentrations at timepoint(s) post Day 1 performed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with treatment group, baseline E2 serum concentrations and country as covariates. Data analysed on the log scale; log scale mean and pooled log scale standard deviation from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) presented. (NCT00322348)
Timeframe: Blood samples for measurement of E2 concentrations collected from all patients at scheduled visits of screening, Day 1 and Weeks 12 and 24 (+/- 7 days). Week 24 data is presented

Interventionpmol/L (Log Mean)
ZOLADEX 10.8 mg1.42
ZOLADEX 3.6 mg1.49

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) at Week 24

Number of participants who were objective responders at Week 24 over the number of participants evaluable for response x 100. An objective responder = a participants whose best unconfirmed response is either CR (Complete Response Disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (Partial Response At least a 30% decrease in target lesions) (NCT00322348)
Timeframe: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) tumour assessments carried out every 12 weeks from randomisation until Week 24 in those patients with measurable disease at baseline.

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
ZOLADEX 10.8 mg28.9
ZOLADEX 3.6 mg25.6

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (0-12 Weeks)

Area under the plasma concentration curve (0-12 weeks) derived from analysis of pharmacokinetic (PK) outcomes samples provided only by participants in the PK subgroup set (all of whom received ZOLADEX 10.8 mg) (NCT00322348)
Timeframe: Blood samples taken at Days 1, 2 and 3, Weeks 4, 12 and 24. Derived from the individual goserelin plasma concentration-time profiles following the first dose of study drug for patients in the pharmacokinetic (PK) subgroup

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
ZOLADEX 10.8 mg33.021

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration, Cmax (ng/mL)

Maximum plasma concentration, Cmax (ng/mL), derived from analysis of pharmacokinetic (PK) outcomes samples provided only by participants in the PK subgroup set (all of whom received ZOLADEX 10.8 mg) (NCT00322348)
Timeframe: Blood samples taken at Days 1, 2 and 3, Weeks 4, 12 and 24. Derived from the individual goserelin plasma concentration-time profiles following the first dose of study drug for patients in the pharmacokinetic (PK) subgroup

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
ZOLADEX 10.8 mg4.565

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration, Tmax (Hours)

Time to maximum plasma concentration, Tmax (hours), derived from analysis of pharmacokinetic (PK) outcomes samples provided only by participants in the PK subgroup set (all of whom received ZOLADEX 10.8 mg) (NCT00322348)
Timeframe: Blood samples taken at Days 1, 2 and 3, Weeks 4, 12 and 24. Derived from the individual goserelin plasma concentration-time profiles following the first dose of study drug for patients in the pharmacokinetic (PK) subgroup

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
ZOLADEX 10.8 mg1.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at Week 24

The number of participants for whom neither objective disease progression or death (due to any cause) has been observed at Week 24 over the number of randomised participants x 100. (NCT00322348)
Timeframe: Objective tumour assessments carried out every 12 weeks (+/- 7 days) until Week 24, and then every 24 weeks (+/- 14 days) until Week 96 or objective progression is confirmed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST).

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
ZOLADEX 10.8 mg69.4
ZOLADEX 3.6 mg73.5

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of Samarium-153

"To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Samarium as adjuvant to combined hormonal therapy (HT) and external beam radiation therapy (RT).~Dose levels:~Dose I: 0.25 mCi/kg IV Dose II: 0.5 mCi/kg IV Dose III: 0.75 mCi/kg IV Dose IV: 1.0 mCi/kg IV Dose V: 1.5 mCi/kg IV Dose VI: 2.0 mCi/kg IV~Dose-limiting toxicity will be defined as Grade 3 hematologic toxicity per NCI Common Toxicity Criteria. The maximally tolerated dose (MTD) will then be the last dose studied or the previous dose, based on clinical judgment of the degree of toxicity seen at the last dose." (NCT00328614)
Timeframe: 5 months (1 month HT, administration of drug, 4 months HT and RT)

InterventionmCi/kg (Number)
Samarium-1532.0

[back to top]

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Failures

Baseline + Post-radiation PSA levels at three month intervals for initial two years then every 6 months thereafter. Participants with a rising PSA and no evidence of local or distant recurrence considered PSA failures. (NCT00388804)
Timeframe: 3 months up to 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
RT Group 10
RT Group 2 + Hormone Therapy0

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Response (FSH Level + Vaginal Bleeding)

"Outcome characterized in terms of two variables, each measured repeatedly over time: Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level and whether vaginal bleeding occurs, each to be measured from the end of chemotherapy. For treatment comparison, response defined as a composite event: both [FSH < 15] and vaginal bleeding observed within 12 months after the end of chemotherapy, with both FSH and vaginal bleeding baseline observed before start of chemotherapy." (NCT00429403)
Timeframe: Baseline prior to chemotherapy then every 3 months after chemotherapy for 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Goserelin1

[back to top]

5-year bPFS Rate

Proportion of participants surviving 5 years from randomization without biochemical progression or death. (NCT00430183)
Timeframe: 5 years

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Arm A: Docetaxel + LHRH Agonist + Surgical Intervention0.81
Arm B: Surgical Intervention0.74

[back to top]

Proportion of Biochemical Progression-Free Survival (bPFS Proportion) at 3 Years

Proportion of participants surviving 3 years from randomization without biochemical progression or death. bPFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documented biochemical progression or death. Progression will be defined as having experienced either of the following: a serum PSA level > 0.2 ng/mL that increases on 2 consecutive occasions each of which is at least 3 months apart or death occurs. The time of biochemical failure is measured from the date of randomization to the date of the first PSA level > 0.2 ng/mL. (NCT00430183)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionproportion of patients (Number)
Arm A: Docetaxel + LHRH Agonist + Surgical Intervention0.89
Arm B: Surgical Intervention0.84

[back to top]

Clinical Response Rate

Clinical Response Rate was measured according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Criteria for target lesions before surgery: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT00432172)
Timeframe: Up to week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 1 (Luminal A) Standard Treatment31
Group 1 (Luminal A) Selective Treatment23
Group 2 (Basal) Standard Treatment32
Group 2 (Basal) Selective Treatment36

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Pathological Complete Response

Probability of response, defined as pathological complete remission based on tissue obtained at surgery. Pathological Complete Response (pCR): Patients without gross or microscopic evidence of residual disease at Radical Prostatectomy defined as pCR. (NCT00500110)
Timeframe: Every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months until disease progression or death

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment0

[back to top]

Follow-up of the 8 Patients With Metastases Limited to Pelvic Lymph Nodes.

Length of follow-up of the 8 patients with metastases limited to pelvic lymph nodes, months. Patients are followed on day one of each of three 12-week periods. After completion of therapy, patients are followed every four weeks until PSA relapse, up to 46.4 months. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: Patients are followed on day one of each of three 12-week periods. After completion of therapy, patients are followed every four weeks until PSA relapse, up to 46.4 months.

Interventionmonth (Median)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)14.7

[back to top]

CR Without ADT in Patients With Metastases Limited to Pelvic Lymph Nodes.

Number of patients remaining in complete remission without androgen deprivation therapy in patients with metastases limited to pelvic lymph nodes. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: after 36 weeks of LHRH therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)4

[back to top]

Count of Patients Remaining Off of Therapy

Patients who remained off of therapy, in remission, out of the number of patients with metastases limited to pelvic lymph nodes. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: after 36 week LHRH treatment window.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)7

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Relapse

Time from the date of the last dose of bicalutamide or the last day of radiation therapy (whichever comes later) until the date criteria are met for PSA relapse. PSA relapse after completion of initial 36 weeks of androgen deprivation therapy is defined as an increase in PSA value to above pre-therapy level, or to > 10, whichever is smaller. For example, a patient with pre-treatment PSA level of 40 will resume androgen deprivation therapy when PSA level is > 10, while a patient with pre-treatment PSA level of 3 will resume androgen deprivation therapy when PSA level is > 3. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: End-of-therapy until PSA reached pre-treatment level or 10 (whichever was lower)

Interventionmonth (Median)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)16.5

[back to top]

Rate of Treatment Failure (no PSA Threshold Below 4 ng/dl, or no PSA Below Baseline Level Before LHRH Treatment).

Treatment failures: Count and percent of patients NOT reaching PSA concentration in serum either below 4 ng/dl or below baseline before LHRH treatment . (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: Off-treatment PSA measurement date minus on-study PSA measurement date, up to 36 weeks.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)15

[back to top]

Patients Who Achieved PSA Nadir of < 0.2 at 36 Weeks.

Number of Patients who achieved PSA nadir of < 0.2 at 36 weeks. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: During the time period between on-study PSA to off-study PSA, up to 36 weeks.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)25

[back to top]

Length of Follow-up

Length of follow-up in weeks to off-study date. Patients are treated for 36 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) with androgen deprivation therapy. Patients are evaluated for disease on day 1 of each of three 12-week cycles. After the last cycle of anti-androgen therapy, patients are assessed every four weeks until PSA relapse occurs, up to 264.8 weeks (61.4 months; 5.1 years). Patients will remain off-treatment until they meet the criteria for re-treatment with androgen deprivation therapy, whereupon they will be taken off of the protocol. After patients are taken off protocol, we will do a chart review for long-term outcomes. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: Patients are evaluated for disease on day 1 of each of three 12-week cycles. After the last cycle of anti-androgen therapy, patients are assessed every four weeks until PSA relapse occurs, up to 61.4 months

Interventionweek (Median)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)111.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Late Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events > 90 Days From the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Late adverse events (AE) are defined as occurring > 90 days from the completion of RT. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first late grade 2 or grade 3 adverse event, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times between Arm 2 and Arm 1 and between Arm 3 and Arm 2, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: AE: from 91 days after completion of RT (approximately 7-8 weeks) to last follow-up. Vital status: from randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 2+Grade 3+
PBRT + STAD54.811.4
PBRT Alone52.810.3
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD58.614.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Mortality)

Survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Pairwise comparisons of the overall distributions of failure times are reported in statistical analysis section, with five-year rates reported here. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone93.9
PBRT + STAD96.1
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD95.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Free From Hormone-refractory Disease (Castrate-resistant Disease)

Hormone-refractory disease (failure) is defined as three rises in PSA after the start of second salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone2.9
PBRT + STAD2.4
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD1.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Free From Progression (FFP) at 5 Years

Progression is defined as the first occurrence of the following events: biochemical failure by the Phoenix definition (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥ 2 ng/ml over the nadir PSA), clinical failure (local, regional or distant), or death from any cause. The initiation of second salvage therapy before progression was a protocol violation and resulted in censoring. Progression time is defined as time from randomization to the date of progression, second salvage therapy (censored), or last known follow-up (censored). Freedom from progression rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but results were reported early. See Limitations and Caveats section. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to five years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone70.3
PBRT + STAD81.3
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD87.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Prostate Cancer (Cause-specific Mortality)

Cause-specific mortality (failure) is defined as death due to prostate cancer or complications of protocol treatment (centrally reviewed), or death following disease progression (clinical or biochemical) in the absence of or after the initiation of any salvage therapy. [Biochemical progression is indicated by any rise in PSA.] Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone2.7
PBRT + STAD1.1
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD0.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis

Distant metastasis (failure) is defined as the occurrence of distant metastasis determined by imaging. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone8.3
PBRT + STAD5.9
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD4.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Local Failure

Local failure is defined as first occurrence of local clinical progression. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone3.1
PBRT + STAD1.2
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD0.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events ≤ 90 Days of the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Pairwise comparisons of Arm 2 vs Arm 1 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 2 are reported in the statistical analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to 90 days after completion of radiotherapy (approximately 7-8 weeks).

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 2+Grade 3+
PBRT + STAD36.38.7
PBRT Alone18.84.4
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD43.612.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Secondary Biochemical Failure (Alternative Biochemical Failure)

Secondary biochemical (failure) is defined as either of two occurrences: 1. For detectable post-baseline PSA values (≥ 0.1), the first occurrence of a PSA value that is both ≥ 0.4 and a second rise above nadir; 2.The start of second salvage therapy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but results were reported early. See Limitations and Caveats section. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone35.7
PBRT + STAD22.3
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD14.5

[back to top]

Levels of Testosterone in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

(NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionng/dL (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)319

[back to top]

Levels of PSA in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

(NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)9.44

[back to top]

Levels of DHT in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

(NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionng/dL (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)24

[back to top]

Levels of DHEA in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

(NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionng/dL (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)256

[back to top]

Gleason Score

A Gleason score is the sum of two numbers. Pathologist determines where the cancer is most prominent and assigns the primary grade, the secondary grade is assigned based on where the cancer is next most prominent. A score from one to five is assigned for each area based on how aggressive the tumor appears. A tumor with cell that appear close to normal is assigned a low Gleason score (six or below). A tumor with cells that appear clearly different from those of a normal prostate is assigned a high Gleason score (seven or above). A system of grading prostate cancer tissue based on how it looks under a microscope. Gleason scores range from 2 to 10 and indicate how likely it is that a tumor will spread. A low Gleason score means the cancer tissue is similar to normal prostate tissue and the tumor is less likely to spread; a high Gleason score means the cancer tissue is very different from normal and the tumor is more likely to spread. (NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)8

[back to top]

Levels of DHEA-S in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

(NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionmcg/dL (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)90

[back to top]

Anastrozole Plasma Concentrations (Cmin)

Trough Plasma concentrations (Cmin) of Anastrozole - only Anastrozole arm was evaluated for Trough Plasma concentrations. (NCT00605267)
Timeframe: Assessed at week 12

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Anastrozole 1 mg29.7

[back to top]

Best Overall Response Rate (BORR) (Calliper)

"The BORR were defined as the percentage of patients with confirmed CR or PR in the ITT population during 24 weeks pre-operative treatment period (based on the data from calliper measurement).~CR (or PR) criteria are met at 2 or more time in points every 4 weeks. Per RECIST Criteria (V1.0) and assessed by Calliper: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >= 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR." (NCT00605267)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Anastrozole 1 mg70.4
Tamoxifen 20 mg50.5

[back to top]

Best Overall Response Rate (BORR) (MRI/CT)

"The BORR were defined as the percentage of patients with confirmed CR or PR in the ITT population during 24 weeks pre-operative treatment period(based on the data from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) measurement).~CR (or PR) criteria are met at either 12 weeks or 24 weeks. Per RECIST Criteria (V1.0) and assessed by MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >= 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR." (NCT00605267)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Anastrozole 1 mg64.3
Tamoxifen 20 mg37.4

[back to top]

Best Overall Response Rate (BORR) (US)

"The BORR were defined as the percentage of patients with confirmed CR or PR in the ITT population during 24 weeks pre-operative treatment period (based on the data from ultra sound (US) measurement).~CR (or PR) criteria are met at 2 or more time in points every 4 weeks. Per RECIST Criteria (V1.0) and assessed by US: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >= 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR." (NCT00605267)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Anastrozole 1 mg58.2
Tamoxifen 20 mg42.4

[back to top]

Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Cervical Thighbone

Change from baseline in Bone Mineral Density value (percentage), in all subjects who used DXA(Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) method throughout the study, at 24 weeks measured at cervical thighbone. (NCT00605267)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment

InterventionPercentageBMD=Patient'sBMD/standard BMD) (Mean)
Anastrozole 1 mg-2.5
Tamoxifen 20 mg-0.5

[back to top]

Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Lumbar Spine

Change from baseline in Bone Mineral Density value (percentage), in all subjects who used DXA(Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) method throughout the study, at 24 weeks measured at lumbar spine. (NCT00605267)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment

InterventionPercentageBMD=Patient's BMD/standard BMD (Mean)
Anastrozole 1 mg-5.8
Tamoxifen 20 mg-2.9

[back to top]

Bone Turnover Marker (BAP) CLEIA Method

Change from baseline in serum Bone-Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP) at 24 weeks measured by CLEIA method (NCT00605267)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionug/L (Mean)
Anastrozole 1 mg3.96
Tamoxifen 20 mg-0.75

[back to top]

Bone Turnover Marker (BAP) EIA Method

Change from baseline in serum Bone-Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP) at 24 weeks measured by EIA method (NCT00605267)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment

InterventionU/L (Mean)
Anastrozole 1 mg7.1941
Tamoxifen 20 mg0.7333

[back to top]

Bone Turnover Marker (NTX)

Change from baseline in serum crosslinked N-Telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) at 24 weeks (NCT00605267)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment

InterventionnmolBCE(Bone Collagen Equivalent) /L (Mean)
Anastrozole 1 mg9.17
Tamoxifen 20 mg2.59

[back to top]

Endocrine Subscale (ES)

"Change from baseline in Endocrine Symptom Subscale (ES)) in the ITT population at 24 weeks. ES score = the sum of the responses to all the questions on ES, low scores reflect poor quality of life and high scores reflects better quality of life.~Score range: 0-72" (NCT00605267)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment

InterventionES score (Mean)
Anastrozole 1 mg-8.85
Tamoxifen 20 mg-6.27

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B)

"Change from baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B)in the ITT population at 24 weeks. Trial Outcome Index (TOI) = the sum of the Physical Well-Being (PWB), Functional Well-Being (FWB), and Breast Cancer Scale (BCS) subscales of FACT-B.~FACT-B includes 36 questions; 7 in PWB (Physical Well-Being); 7 inSWB (Social / Family Well-Being); 6 in EWB (Emotional Well-Being); 7 in FWB (Functional Well-Being); 9 in BCS (Breast Cancer Subscale).~Total score of subscores or TOI is calculated from each score of question. Higher score means better and lower score means worthier.~Score range; 0-28 in PWB; 0-28 in SWB; 0-24 in EWB; 0-28 in FWB; 0-36 in BCS; 0-92 in TOI." (NCT00605267)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment

InterventionTrial Outcome Index (TOI) (Prorated) (Mean)
Anastrozole 1 mg-4.42
Tamoxifen 20 mg-2.65

[back to top]

Histopathological Response Rate (HRR)

Number of patients in the ITT population defined as histopathological responders over the total number of patients x 100. An histopathological responder = a patient classified as Grade 1b, 2 or 3 for the histopathological response (Grade 0 = no response, 1a = mild response, 1b = moderate response, 2 = marked response or 3 = complete response) (NCT00605267)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Anastrozole 1 mg41.8
Tamoxifen 20 mg27.3

[back to top]

Serum Oestradiol (E2) Concentrations

Ratio of serum Oestradiol (E2) concentration (pg/mL) in the ITT population from baseline at 24 weeks. (NCT00605267)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Anastrozole 1 mg0.041
Tamoxifen 20 mg0.082

[back to top]

Serum Oestrone (E1) Concentrations

Ratio of serum Oestrone (E1) concentration (pg/mL) in the ITT population from baseline at 24 weeks. (NCT00605267)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Anastrozole 1 mg0.028
Tamoxifen 20 mg0.341

[back to top]

Oestrogen Receptor (ER) Status

ER status in the ITT population is categorized as Positive or Negative (NCT00605267)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline Positive & 24 weeks NegativeBaseline Positive & 24 weeks PositiveBaseline Negative & 24 weeks NegativeBaseline Negative & 24 weeks Positive
Anastrozole 1 mg29200
Tamoxifen 20 mg18900

[back to top]

Progesterone Receptor (PgR) Status

PgR status in the ITT population is categorized as Positive or Negative. (NCT00605267)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline Positive & 24 weeks NegativeBaseline Positive & 24 weeks PositiveBaseline Negative & 24 weeks NegativeBaseline Negative & 24 weeks Positive
Anastrozole 1 mg602941
Tamoxifen 20 mg195993

[back to top]

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Status

HER2 status in the ITT population is categorized as Positive or Negative (NCT00605267)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline Positive & 24 weeks NegativeBaseline Positive & 24 weeks PositiveBaseline Negative & 24 weeks NegativeBaseline Negative & 24 weeks Positive
Anastrozole 1 mg00922
Tamoxifen 20 mg00882

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Can Safely Tolerate and Complete Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy, Radiation Therapy and Docetaxel After a Radical Prostatectomy

Defined as percentage of patients that complete full dose of Radiation Therapy (RT) (NCT00669162)
Timeframe: 8 Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
RT, Docetaxel, Hormonal Therapy26

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12

TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate. (NCT00831233)
Timeframe: After 12 weeks treatment compared to Baseline

InterventionmL (Mean)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-22.4
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-13.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12

The IPSS is a tool commonly used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and to monitor the progress of the disease once treatment has been initiated. The participant completes a questionnaire containing 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is assigned a score of 0-5. The total score is then classified according to the following scale: 0 to 7 = mildly symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; and 20 to 35 = severely symptomatic. (NCT00831233)
Timeframe: After treatment of 12 weeks compared to Baseline

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-11.2
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-7.69

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Maximum Urine Flow (Qmax) at Each Visit

Uroflowmetry was used to quantify the maximum urine flow (Qmax; mL/sec) (NCT00831233)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
InterventionmL/sec (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg3.634.743.62
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)3.553.522.07

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Residual Volume (Vresidual) at Each Visit

Uroflowmetry was used to quantify the residual volume (Vresidual; mL) (NCT00831233)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
InterventionmL (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-36.2-43.8-50.7
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-19.8-19.6-13.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Weeks 4 and 8

The IPSS is a tool commonly used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and to monitor the progress of the disease once treatment has been initiated. The participant completes a questionnaire containing 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is assigned a score of 0-5. The total score is then classified according to the following scale: 0 to 7 = mildly symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; and 20 to 35 = severely symptomatic. (NCT00831233)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4 and 8 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Week 4Week 8
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-7.31-9.46
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-4.62-8.08

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables

The figures present the number of participants who had abnormal (defined as above upper limit of normal range (ULN)) levels of safety laboratory variables. Only the laboratory variables that had at least on participant with one abnormal value are presented, many more variables were included in the trial. (NCT00831233)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
B-Haematocrit (Ratio) <=0.37B-Platelet count (10^9/L) <=75S-Calcium (mmol/L) <=1.8S-Potassium (mmol/L) >=5.8S-Urea nitrogen (mmol/L) >=10.7
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg51101
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)10012

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight

This outcome measure included incidence of markedly abnormal changes in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), pulse, and body weight. The table presents the number of participants with normal baseline and at least one post-baseline markedly abnormal value. (NCT00831233)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Diastolic blood pressure <=50 and decrease >=15Diastolic blood pressure >=105 and increase >=15Systolic blood pressure <=90 and decrease >=20Systolic blood pressure >=180 and increase >=20Heart rate <=50 and decrease >=15Heart rate >=120 and increase >=15Body weight decrease of >=7 percentBody weight increase of >=7 percent
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg00000011
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)00000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Testosterone <=0.5 Nanograms/Milliliter at Each Visit

(NCT00831233)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg262527
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)121212

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Concentration at Each Visit

(NCT00831233)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionpercentage (Median)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-85.72-89.2-93.87
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-93.44-97.26-97.78

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Oestradiol Levels During the Study

(NCT00833248)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionnanogram per deciliter (Median)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-1.55-1.6-1.55
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-1.65-1.65-1.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set)

TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate. (NCT00833248)
Timeframe: After treatment of 12 weeks compared to Baseline

Interventionmilliliter (Mean)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-36.0
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-35.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Per Protocol Analysis Set)

TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate. (NCT00833248)
Timeframe: After treatment of 12 weeks compared to Baseline

Interventionmilliliter (Mean)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-36.2
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-35.4

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels During the Study

(NCT00833248)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Median)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-6.3-7.95-8.35
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-5.9-8.8-9.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone Levels During the Study

(NCT00833248)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Median)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-3.8-3.77-3.81
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-4.22-4.26-4.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 4, 8, and 12

The IPSS is a tool commonly used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and to monitor the progress of the disease once treatment has been initiated. The participant completes a questionnaire containing 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is assigned a score of 0-5. The total score is then classified according to the following scale: 0 to 7 = mildly symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; and 20 to 35 = severely symptomatic. (NCT00833248)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-0.21-1.53-1.71
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)0.360.020.11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables

The figures present the number of participants who had abnormal (defined as above upper limit of normal range (ULN)) levels of safety laboratory variables. Only the laboratory variables that had at least one percentage of participants in either group with abnormal value are presented, more variables were included in the study. (NCT00833248)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
B-Haematocrit (Ratio) <=0.37B-Haemoglobin (g/L) <=115S-Alanine aminotransferase (IU/L) >3 x ULNS-Potassium (mmol/L) >=5.8S-Urea nitrogen (mmol/L) >=10.7
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg3141410
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)81113

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight

This outcome measure included incidence of markedly abnormal changes in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), pulse, and body weight. The table presents the number of participants with normal baseline and at least one post-baseline markedly abnormal value. (NCT00833248)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Diastolic blood pressure <=50 and decrease >=15Diastolic blood pressure >=105 and increase >=15Systolic blood pressure <=90 and decrease >=20Systolic blood pressure >=180 and increase >=20Heart rate <=50 and decrease >=15Heart rate >=120 and increase >=15Body weight decrease of >=7 percentBody weight increase of >=7 percent
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg03011035
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)00011020

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on TRUS at Week 4 and 8

TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate. (NCT00884273)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4 and 8 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionmilliliter (Mean)
Week 4Week 8
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-19.2-33.1
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-21.2-33.2

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 4, 8, and 12

The IPSS is a tool commonly used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and to monitor the progress of the disease once treatment has been initiated. The participant completes a questionnaire containing 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is assigned a score of 0-5. The total score is then classified according to the following scale: 0 to 7 = mildly symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; and 20 to 35 = severely symptomatic. (NCT00884273)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-2.09-3.55-4.39
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-1.36-3.13-2.74

[back to top]

Change in Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels During the Study

(NCT00884273)
Timeframe: At 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to baseline.

,
Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Median)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-20.25-22.5-25.15
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-12.10-14.6-13.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables

The figures present the number of participants who had abnormal (defined as above upper limit of normal range (ULN)) levels of safety laboratory variables. Only the laboratory variables that had at least one percentage of participants in either group with abnormal value are presented, more variables were included in the study. (NCT00884273)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
B-Haematocrit (Ratio) <=0.37B-Haemoglobin (g/L) <=115B-Red blood cell count (10^12/L) <=3.5B-White blood cell count (10^9/L) <=2.8S-Alanine aminotransferase (IU/L) >3xULNS-Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L) >3xULN+25% increaseS-Aspartate aminotransferase (IU/L) >3xULNS-Cholesterol (mmol/L) >=8.0S-Glutamyltransferase (IU/L) >3xULNS-Potassium (mmol/L) >=5.8S-Urea nitrogen (mmol/L) >=10.7
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg1321310021310
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)161012120033

[back to top]

Change in Serum Testosterone Levels During the Study

(NCT00884273)
Timeframe: At 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to baseline.

,
Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Median)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-3.91-3.97-4.09
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-4.17-4.24-4.23

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight

This outcome measure included incidence of markedly abnormal changes in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), pulse, and body weight. The table presents the number of participants with normal baseline and at least one post-baseline markedly abnormal value. (NCT00884273)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Diastolic blood pressure <=50 and decrease >=15Diastolic blood pressure >=105 and increase >=15Systolic blood pressure <=90 and decrease >=20Systolic blood pressure >=180 and increase >=20Heart rate <=50 and decrease >=15Heart rate >=120 and increase >=15Body weight decrease of >=7 percentBody weight increase of >=7 percent
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg00021002
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)01040053

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set)

TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate. (NCT00884273)
Timeframe: After treatment of 12 weeks compared to Baseline

Interventionmilliliter (Mean)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-37.2
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-39.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Per Protocol Analysis Set)

TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate. (NCT00884273)
Timeframe: After treatment of 12 weeks compared to Baseline

Interventionmilliliter (Mean)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-37.3
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-39.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Burden of Urinary Symptoms Based on the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPHII)

The Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPHII) is a self-administered questionnaire to measure how much urinary problems affect various domains of health. The higher value the worse are the urinary problems. The minimum possible total value is 0 and the maximum possible total value is 16. (NCT00884273)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-0.78-0.88-1.28
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-0.70-1.09-1.16

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Failed (Freedom From Failure)

Failure is defined as biochemical failure, local failure, or distant metastasis. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone14.8
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation7.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Receiving Salvage Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)

Salvage (non-protocol) ADT administration is defined as the first administration of subsequent ADT (either LHRH agonist or anti-androgen) Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Salvage ADT rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of salvage ADT times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone6.1
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation4.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure

Biochemical failure is defined as an increase of at least 2 ng/ml above the nadir PSA. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone13.9
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation7.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis

"Distant metastasis (failure) is defined as metastatic disease documented by any method. If diagnosed on diagnostic imaging prompted by biochemical failure, then the event date will be the date of biochemical progression.~Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (competing risk), or death without failure (censored). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported." (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone3.1
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation0.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Late Grade 3+ Adverse Events

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Late adverse events are defined as occurring more than 30 days after the end of radiation therapy. Failure is defined as grade 3 or higher late adverse event. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone12.8
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation15.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Bowel Domain Score

The EPIC assesses disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and it's therapies and consists of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal), each ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as time point value - baseline value, such that a positive change indicates improvement. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
End of RTSix months post-RTOne year post-RTFive years post-RT
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone-9.7-2.6-4.0-2.7
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation-10.5-3.8-5.2-2.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Acute Adverse Events

Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Acute adverse events are defined as occuring within 30 days of completion of radiation therapy. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone152
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation504

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Domain Score

The EPIC assesses disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and it's therapies and consists of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal), each ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as time point value - baseline value, such that a positive change indicates improvement. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
End of RTSix months post-RTOne year post-RTFive years post-RT
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone-1.8-0.7-0.8-0.3
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation-18.4-13.7-7.8-2.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Domain Score

The EPIC assesses disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and it's therapies and consists of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal), each ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as time point value - baseline value, such that a positive change indicates improvement. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
End of RTSix months post-RTOne year post-RTFive years post-RT
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone-6.7-7.9-8.5-10.0
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation-22.6-19.9-16.6-9.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Local Recurrence

Local recurrence (failure) is defined as clinical (palpable) suspicion of local recurrence [this date is used] confirmed by biopsy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone2.6
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Urinary Domain Score

The EPIC assesses disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and it's therapies and consists of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal), each ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as time point value - baseline value, such that a positive change indicates improvement. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
End of RTSix months post-RTOne year post-RTFive years post-RT
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone (Arm 1)-12.4-0.1-1.9-0.4
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation (Arm 2)-13.8-3.6-1.60.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Domain Score

The PROMIS Fatigue short form 8a contains 8 questions, each with 5 responses ranging from 1 to 5, evaluating self-reported fatigue symptoms over the past 7 days. The total score is the sum of all questions which is then converted into a pro-rated T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with a possible range of 33.1 to 77.8. Higher scores indicate more fatigue. Change is defined as value at one year - value at baseline. Positive change from baseline indicates increased fatigue at one year. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
End of RTSix months post-RTOne year post_RTFive years post-RT
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone0.801.090.990.97
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation1.841.210.860.80

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival) by Radiation Therapy Modality

Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
EBRTEBRT +LDR Brachytherapy BoostEBRT +HDR Brachytherapy Boost
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone89.410091.7
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation90.397.2100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Dead Due to Cause Other Than Prostate Cancer (Non-Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality)

Non-prostate cancer specific mortality is defined as a death without evidence of prostate cancer or a complication from treatment. . Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone9.1
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation9.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival)

Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone90.0
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation91.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Dead Due to Prostate Cancer (Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality)

Prostate cancer specific mortality (failure) is defined as death due to prostate cancer or a complication from treatment. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone0.90
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation0

[back to top]

Number of Deaths

The number of deaths due to any cause are reported below. (NCT00937768)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Androgen Deprivation Therapy0
No Androgen Deprivation Therapy0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Regardless of Attribution

Percentage of Participants with Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events regardless of attribution per NCI CTCAE Version 3 (NCT00937768)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Androgen Deprivation Therapy100
No Androgen Deprivation Therapy37.5

[back to top]

Average LASA Overall Quality of Life at Baseline, Months 3 and 6

LASA Overall Quality of Life at Baseline, Months 3 and 6. Quality of Life (QOL) was measured using the single-item Linear Analogue Self Assessment (LASA) on a 0-10 scale, with 0=as bad as it can be and 10=as good as it can be. The average and standard deviation of the LASA overall quality of life score are reported below at baseline, months 3 and 6. (NCT00937768)
Timeframe: Baseline to Months 3 and 6

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineMonth 3Month 6
Androgen Deprivation Therapy8.81.06.2
No Androgen Deprivation Therapy6.97.08.7

[back to top]

Average Overall FACT-P Total Score at Baseline, Months 3 and 6

The overall FACT-P Total Score at Baseline and months 3 and 6 mean and standard deviations are reported below. The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess participant function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global quality of life score which is the sum of all 5 domain scores and ranges from 0 to 156 where higher scores represent better quality of life. (NCT00937768)
Timeframe: Baseline and months 3 and 6

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineMonth 3Month 6
Androgen Deprivation Therapy122.7118.6109.4
No Androgen Deprivation Therapy114.8117.8136.8

[back to top]

Cumulative Probability of Testosterone at Castrate Level (≤0.5 ng/mL) With Degarelix

This co-primary outcome measure was used to demonstrate that degarelix is effective with respect to achieving and maintaining testosterone suppression to castrate levels, evaluated as the proportion of patients with testosterone suppression ≤0.5 ng/mL from Day 28 to Day 364. (NCT00946920)
Timeframe: From Day 28 to Day 364

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Degarelix 240 mg/480 mg90.0

[back to top]

Difference in Cumulative Probability of Testosterone at Castrate Level (≤0.5 ng/mL) Between Degarelix and Goserelin

This co-primary outcome measure was used to establish non-inferiority of degarelix as compared to goserelin with regard to achieving and maintaining testosterone suppression at castrate levels (≤0.5 ng/mL) from Day 3 to Day 364, using a non-inferiority margin of 5 percentage points. (NCT00946920)
Timeframe: Day 3 to Day 364

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Degarelix 240 mg/480 mg85.0
Goserelin Acetate5.3

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Testosterone Over Time

Median testosterone levels are presented as absolute values at Baseline (in Baseline measures) and after 1, 2, 3, 6 and 13 months (below). One treatment month equals 28 days. (NCT00946920)
Timeframe: Baseline and after 1, 2, 3, 6 and 13 months

,
Interventionng/mL (Median)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 6Month 13
Degarelix 240 mg/480 mg0.100.090.090.090.11
Goserelin Acetate0.160.100.090.090.09

[back to top] [back to top]

Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Score at Months 1, 4, 7, and 13 Compared to Baseline

"IPSS is used to assess severity of lower urinary tract symptoms and to monitor the progress of symptoms once treatment has been initiated. It contains 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is assigned a score of 0-5 (i.e. the minimum total score is 0 and the maximum is 35). A score of 0 corresponds to a response of not at all for the first six symptoms and none for nocturia, and a score of 5 corresponds to a response of almost always for the first six symptoms and 5 times or more for nocturia." (NCT00946920)
Timeframe: At baseline, 1 month, 4 months, 7 months and 13 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Month 1Month 4Month 7Month 13
Degarelix 240 mg/480 mg-1.06-2.31-2.47-2.04
Goserelin Acetate-0.21-1.74-2.45-1.52

[back to top]

Percent Change in Serum Levels of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Over Time

Serum PSA levels are presented as mean percent change from Baseline (in Baseline measures) after 1, 2, 3, 6 and 13 months. One treatment month equals 28 days. (NCT00946920)
Timeframe: Baseline and after 1, 2, 3, 6 and 13 months

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 6Month 13
Degarelix 240 mg/480 mg-77-89-90-90-82
Goserelin Acetate-57-86-86-91-77

[back to top]

Levels of Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and Testosterone in Prostate Biopsy Sample Assessed by Mass Spectrometry

The levels from patients treated in this study will be compared to a control set of biopsies acquired from a separate but similar population of men with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer treated with three months of combined Luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist and bicalutamide as part of standard of care. (NCT01023061)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpg/mg (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Radiation Therapy)0.050

[back to top]

Median Time to Prostate Specific Antigen Progression

Defined as the date of an increase of 2ng/mL or more above the Prostate specific antigen nadir achieved after completion of radiation with the date of progression defined as the date on which that value was measured. Distribution of time-to-event variables will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Estimated with two-sided 95% confidence intervals. (NCT01023061)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionyears (Mean)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Radiation Therapy)5

[back to top]

Incidence of Acute and Chronic Grade 3 or Greater Toxicity as Evaluated Using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 3.0

Incidence of acute and chronic grade 3 or greater toxicity as evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 3.0he distribution of time to late adverse events (observed severities of adverse events over time) will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01023061)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months after initiation of radiation therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Radiation Therapy)6

[back to top]

Oestradiol (E2) Serum Concentrations at 24 Weeks

E2 serum concentrations (pg/mL) at 24 weeks (NCT01073865)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the first dosing

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Zoladex 10.8 mg20.302
Zoladex 3.6 mg24.798

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Progression-free Survival (PFS) at 24 Weeks

A patient is judged as progression-free survive at Week 24 if their PFS time is at least 24 weeks with no progression event prior to Week 24 (ie, overall visit response is complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) at a tumour assessment at least 24 weeks after randomization). Overall visit response is assessed according to the RECIST version 1.1. %PFS is the proportion of patients with PFS. (NCT01073865)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the first dosing

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Zoladex 10.8 mg67
Zoladex 3.6 mg68

[back to top]

Number of Responders at 24 Weeks

Responders are defined as those patients with a best objective tumour response of CR or PR during the first 24 weeks of therapy. Tumour response is assessed according to the RECIST version 1.1. ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who are responders. (NCT01073865)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the first dosing

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Zoladex 10.8 mg21
Zoladex 3.6 mg25

[back to top]

Number of Participants Progression Free at 1 Year

Participants prostatic specific antigen (PSA) progression-free or event-free survival (that is, freedom from treatment failure) 1 year postoperatively. Treatment failure defined as objective tumor progression during therapy or in year after surgery, confirmed postoperative PSA ⩾1 ngml - 1, or any postoperative radiation, hormonal or other systemic therapy. Participants who did not undergo surgery within 8 weeks of completing 1 year of therapy on protocol (for any reason, including participant refusal) were counted as treatment failure, as were participants whose surgery was begun and aborted. (NCT01076335)
Timeframe: 1 Year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Neoadjuvant Hormones + Docetaxel13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Pathology Tumor Stage of Less Than or Equal to Prostate Cancer Stage at Which the Tumor is Confined to the Prostate (pT2)

The table below shows number of participants in each treatment group with a pathology tumor stage less than or equal to pT2. (NCT01088529)
Timeframe: At the end of Cycle 3 (at radical prostatectomy)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AA+LHRHa24
LHRHa8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Prostate-Specific Antigen Response

The table below shows number of participants in each treatment group who achieved a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response defined as a drop in PSA value to less than or equal to 0.2 ng/mL. (NCT01088529)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 Day 1

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AA+LHRHa32
LHRHa0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Positive Surgical Margin at Radical Prostatectomy

The table below shows number of participants in each treatment group who had positive surgical margins. A positive surgical margin is defined as tumor extending to the inked-surface or margin of the prostate. (NCT01088529)
Timeframe: At the end of Cycle 3 (at radical prostatectomy)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AA+LHRHa6
LHRHa6

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Who do Not Achieve a Partial PSA Response

A partial PSA response is considered <= 4 ng/mL (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)46
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)56

[back to top]

Correlation of microRNA Measures With 28-week PSA Response

The Friedman test will be used to evaluate correlations between microRNA measures (CT) and 28-week PSA response. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Baseline to 28 weeks

,,
InterventionCycle Threshold (CT) (Median)
miR-141miR-200amiR-200bmiR-210miR-375
PSA Complete Response32.634.533.632.533.0
PSA Non-Responders31.533.832.632.329.5
PSA Partial Response32.033.833.632.132.6

[back to top]

Change in Level of Insulin

Serum samples and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) for pharmacodynamic activity with potential biomarkers for IMC-A12 (insulin) obtained from optional blood specimens both before initiation of androgen deprivation therapy and twelve weeks after initiation of combined therapy. Results are reported as the difference between baseline and 12 weeks after start of therapy. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionulU/mL (Mean)
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)0
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)0

[back to top]

Toxicity

Only adverse events that are possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug are reported. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Up to 28 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Alanine aminotransferase increasedAnemiaAnxietyAspartate aminotransferase increasedCognitive disturbanceDepressionErectile dysfunctionExostosisGlucose intoleranceHot flashesHypercalcemiaHyperglycemiaHypertensionHypertriglyceridemiaLeft ventricular systolic dysfunctionNauseaObesitySoft tissue infectionUrinary tract infectionUrinary tract obstructionVomiting
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)110110110128211111101
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)011001001100200010010

[back to top]

Correlation of microRNA Measures With Baseline Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Counts

The Friedman test will be used to evaluate correlations between microRNA measures (CT) and Baseline CTCs. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Baseline

,,
InterventionCycle Threshold (CT) (Median)
miR-141miR-200amiR-200bmiR-210miR-375
CTC= 1-432.734.733.232.732.7
CTC= 5+31.933.033.632.130.2
CTC=033.034.433.432.532.8

[back to top]

Change in Level of IGFBP2, IGFBP3 and Growth Hormone

Serum samples and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) for pharmacodynamic activity with potential biomarkers for IMC-A12 (including, but not limited to: IGFBP2, IGFBP3 and Growth Hormone) obtained from optional blood specimens both before initiation of androgen deprivation therapy and twelve weeks after initiation of combined therapy. Results are reported as the difference between baseline and 12 weeks after start of therapy. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
IGFBP-IIGFBP-IIIGH
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)-9461389366
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)-904291-25

[back to top]

Change in Level of IGF-I, Free IGF-I and C-peptide

Serum samples and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) for pharmacodynamic activity with potential biomarkers for IMC-A12 (including, but not limited to: IGF-I, free IGF-I and C-peptide) obtained from optional blood specimens both before initiation of androgen deprivation therapy and twelve weeks after initiation of combined therapy. Results are reported as the difference between baseline and 12 weeks after start of therapy. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
C-peptideIGF-IIGF-II
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)-7010
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)31-6

[back to top]

Undetectable PSA Rate

Undetectable PSA rate (<= 0.2 ng/mL) after seven cycles (28 weeks) of protocol treatment (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: 7 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)42
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)34

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Tumor Response Per RECIST

Per RECIST criteria v. 1.1: measurable lesions: complete response (CR) disappearance of target lesions, partial response (PR) > 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, progressive disease (PD) > 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions or appearance of new lesions, stable disease (SD) neither sufficient decrease nor increase of the sum of smallest sum of the LD of target lesions (NCT01205685)
Timeframe: Every 12 weeks to tumor progression

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive disease
OSI-906 + Erlotinib + Letrozole + Goserelin00010

[back to top]

Anti-tumor Activity of OSI-906

Time to progression measured in months from study entry to date of disease progression (NCT01205685)
Timeframe: From study entry to 6 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
OSI-906 + Erlotinib + Letrozole + Goserelin2

[back to top]

Safety Profile Based on Number of Patients With Each Worst-grade Toxicity

According to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events with 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = life threatening/disabling, and 5 = death. (NCT01205685)
Timeframe: Every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients with worst grade toxicity of 1Patients with worst grade toxicity of 2Patients with worst grade toxicity of 3Patients with worst grade toxicity of 4Patients with worst grade toxicity of 5
OSI-906 + Erlotinib + Letrozole + Goserelin26300

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) During 3 Years' Treatment With Degarelix or Goserelin

Median PSA levels are presented as absolute values in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) at baseline and after 1, 6, 12, 19, and 22 months. One month equals 28 days. After 22 months, only a limited number of samples were analysed. (NCT01242748)
Timeframe: Baseline and after 1, 6, 12, 19, and 22 months

,
Interventionng/mL (Median)
BaselineMonth 1Month 6Month 12Month 19Month 22
Degarelix 240 mg/480 mg193.790.820.60.540.535
Goserelin Acetate19.16.50.730.430.280.26

[back to top]

Hazard Ratio of Testosterone Escape Rates During 3 Years' Treatment Between Degarelix and Goserelin

Testosterone escape is defined as serum levels >0.5 ng/mL. The number below present the unadjusted rates (estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method) of no testosterone escape. (NCT01242748)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of no testosterone escape (Number)
Degarelix 240 mg/480 mg83.7
Goserelin Acetate96.7

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Testosterone During 3 Years' Treatment With Degarelix or Goserelin

Median testosterone levels are presented as absolute values in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) at baseline and after 1, 6, 12, 19, and 22 months. One month equals 28 days. After 22 months, only a limited number of samples were analysed. (NCT01242748)
Timeframe: Baseline and after 1, 6, 12, 19, and 22 months

,
Interventionng/mL (Median)
BaselineMonth 1Month 6Month 12Month 19Month 22
Degarelix 240 mg/480 mg4.520.100.090.100.110.11
Goserelin Acetate4.620.160.090.090.050.05

[back to top]

Hazard Ratio of Mortality Rates During 3 Years' Treatment Between Degarelix and Goserelin

The number below present the unadjusted rates (estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method) of death. (NCT01242748)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of deaths (Number)
Degarelix 240 mg/480 mg4.6
Goserelin Acetate5.3

[back to top]

Hazard Ratio of PFS Failure Rates During 3 Years Treatment Between Degarelix and Goserelin

PFS failure is defined as either PSA failure, introduction of additional therapy related to prostate cancer (radiation, anti-androgens or second-line treatment), or death, whichever is first. The number below present the unadjusted rates (estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method) of no PFS failure. (NCT01242748)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of no PFS failure (Number)
Degarelix 240 mg/480 mg71.5
Goserelin Acetate69.0

[back to top]

Hazard Ratio of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression-free Survival (PFS) Failure Rates During 3 Years' Treatment Between Degarelix and Goserelin

PSA PFS failure is defined as either PSA failure (defined as increase in serum PSA of 50%, and at least 5 ng/mL, compared to nadir, measured on two consecutive occasions at least 2 weeks apart) or death, whichever is first. The number below present the unadjusted rates (estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method) of no PSA-PFS. (NCT01242748)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of no PSA-PFS (Number)
Degarelix 240 mg/480 mg75.5
Goserelin Acetate75.4

[back to top]

Hazard Ratio of PSA Failure Rates During 3 Years Treatment Between Degarelix and Goserelin

PSA failure is defined as increase in serum PSA of 50%, and at least 5 ng/mL, compared to nadir, measured on two consecutive occasions at least 2 weeks apart. The number below present the unadjusted rates (estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method) of no PSA failure. (NCT01242748)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of no PSA failure (Number)
Degarelix 240 mg/480 mg77.5
Goserelin Acetate79.6

[back to top] [back to top]

Pathologic Complete Response Was Assessed by Rigorous Pathological Examination by One of Two Pathologists

One of two pathologists (SR, EG), assigned the Gleason scores for each patient from pre-treatment prostate biopsies and assessed pathological staging on post- prostatectomy specimens. Staging including a description of all tumor foci within the gland, presence or absence of perineural invasion and/or lymphovascular invasion, presence of extraprostatic extension of tumor (including seminal vesicle invasion), and margin status. The pathologists reviewed the presence or absence of cancer in each prostate gland removed on the study patients. RECIST has to my knowledge not been used for pathological examination in neoadjuvant studies. 0 out of 28 participants acheived complete response. RECIST is not appropriate as cancer within the gland at the time of treatment is not measurable by RECIST. The primary outcome is a pathological complete response. (NCT01250717)
Timeframe: status post prostectomy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Docetaxel Followed by Radical Prostatectomy0

[back to top]

PEPI-0 Rate in Patients Whose Estradiol is Fully Suppressed (< or = 15 pg/mL) and Tumor Ki67 Level is 10% or Less

(NCT01368263)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group 1 (Ki67 <10%, E2 <= 15 pg/ml)0

[back to top]

Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index Score (PEPI Score)

To obtain the PEPI score, risk points for relapse-free survival (RFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) are assigned depending on the hazard ratio (HR) from the multivariable analysis. The total PEPI score assigned to each patient is the sum of the risk points derived from the pT stage, pN stage, Ki67 level, and estrogen receptor status of the surgical specimen. A HR in the range of 1 to 2 receives one risk point; a HR in the 2 to 2.5 range, two risk points; a HR greater than 2.5, three risk points. The total risk point score for each patient is the sum of all the risk points accumulated from the four factors in the model, ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 12 (worst possible outcome). (NCT01368263)
Timeframe: At time of definitive surgery

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PEPI Score 1PEPI Score 4PEPI Score 7PEPI Score 8
Group 1 (Ki67 <10%, E2 <= 15 pg/ml)1111

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival of patients treated with intermittent ADT and ipilimumab in months. (NCT01377389)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any case, whichever came first, assessed up to 70 months.

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Ipilimumab and Androgen Depravation36

[back to top]

The Number of Clonal Expansion of Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) T-cells

"CD8 T-cells are known as cytotoxic T-cells or killer T-cells. When the resting CD8 T-cells are activated, the activated CD8 T-cells multiple to fight a specific target so creating a group of specifically activated T-cells. This test measured the minimal number of clonal expansions of CD8 T-cells that always preceded an adverse response to treatment that was due to increased activity in the immune system itself. The minimal number of clonal expansion points to what this increased activity in the immune system might look like." (NCT01377389)
Timeframe: Each evaluable patient was followed from the time of their first dose until 30 days after their last dose of study drug

Interventionclonal expansions (Number)
Ipilimumab and Androgen Depravation55

[back to top]

Time to Progression of Disease (PD) Off Androgen Depravation Therapy (ADT), After Treatment With Intermittent ADT Plus Ipilimumab.

The number of months after the last ADT dose until the PSA progression (NCT01377389)
Timeframe: 2 to 45 months

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Ipilimumab and Androgen Depravation8.0

[back to top]

Time to Testosterone Recovery (> 50ng/mL) in Patients Treated With Intermittent ADT Plus Ipilimumab.

The presence of testosterone was followed in each patient from the start of treatment until the testosterone lab test was found to be at a value greater than 50ng/mL. (NCT01377389)
Timeframe: 1 month up to 7 months.

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Ipilimumab and Androgen Depravation3.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Progressed After 7 Months of Being on Treatment

Anti-tumor activity assessed through serial PSA measurements (blood tests) at 7 months on treatment. Progression defined as two consecutive PSA values increasing by at least 20% or more from the lowest PSA value for each patient. (NCT01377389)
Timeframe: at the end of 7 months on treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PSA progression at 7 monthsNo PSA progression at 7 months
Ipilimumab and Androgen Depravation618

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Subjects With a Doubling in Number of T-cells in Tumor Biopsy From Baseline at Pre-radiotherapy (Pre-RT) and Post-radiotherapy (Post-RT)

Doubling in number of T-cells was assessed by immunologic responses (in the tumor microenvironment) in subjects consenting to undergo study biopsies. Baseline was defined as the measurement taken within 8 weeks of prior to the first dose of study medication (Day 1). (NCT01496131)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6-12 (Pre-RT), Week 40 (Post-RT)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pre-RT
Standard Therapy1

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Progression/Recurrence Status Based on Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Levels

"Progression/recurrence status was reported based on Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Levels. Recurrence of PSA after completion of therapy represents disease progression and was determined using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) Phoenix criteria. These criteria define biochemical recurrence after radiation therapy as a PSA level equal to the lowest (nadir) PSA level achieved after therapy plus 2 nanogram per milliliter." (NCT01496131)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard Therapy2
Standard Therapy Plus Tecemotide (L-BLP25)0

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Change From Baseline in the Mucinous Glycoprotein 1 (MUC1) Specific Systemic T-Cells Immune Response at Day 60 (Pre-Radiation)

MUC1-specific systemic immune response was measured by intracellular cytokine antigen specific staining following a period of in vitro stimulation (IVS) with overlapping 15-mer peptide pools encoding the tumor-associated antigen (TAA) MUC-1. Baseline was defined as the measurement taken prior to the first dose of study medication (Day 1). (NCT01496131)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 60 (Pre-Radiation)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard Therapy2
Standard Therapy Plus Tecemotide (L-BLP25)3

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With a Doubling in Number of T-cells in Tumor Biopsy From Baseline at Pre-radiotherapy (Pre-RT) and Post-radiotherapy (Post-RT)

Doubling in number of T-cells was assessed by immunologic responses (in the tumor microenvironment) in subjects consenting to undergo study biopsies. Baseline was defined as the measurement taken within 8 weeks of prior to the first dose of study medication (Day 1). (NCT01496131)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6-12 (Pre-RT), Week 40 (Post-RT)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pre-RTPost-RT
Standard Therapy Plus Tecemotide (L-BLP25)11

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Change From Baseline in the Mucinous Glycoprotein 1 (MUC1) Specific Systemic T-Cells Immune Response at Day 190 (Post-radiation)

MUC1-specific systemic immune response was measured by intracellular cytokine antigen specific staining following a period of in vitro stimulation (IVS) with overlapping 15-mer peptide pools encoding the tumor-associated antigen (TAA) MUC-1. Baseline was defined as the measurement taken prior to the first dose of study medication (Day 1). (NCT01496131)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 190 (Post-radiation)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard Therapy1
Standard Therapy Plus Tecemotide (L-BLP25)1

[back to top]

Incidence of Complete Response (CR)

Percentage of participants with CR post surgery. To evaluate the pathological complete response rate to androgen ablation plus Cabazitaxel in patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer following radiation therapy. Pathological Complete Response (pCR): Participants with no residual cancer in the local resection specimen and pelvic lymph nodes will be considered pCR. (NCT01531205)
Timeframe: One Year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental: Drug and Hormonal Therapy With Salvage Surgery0

[back to top]

Incidence of Perioperative and Postoperative Morbidity

Number of events. To access the perioperative and postoperative morbidity with salvage surgery after neoadjuvant hormonal ablation and Cabazitaxel. (NCT01531205)
Timeframe: One Year

Interventionevents (Number)
Experimental: Drug and Hormonal Therapy With Salvage Surgery0

[back to top]

Incidence of PSA Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Percentage of participants with stable (has not increased) or undetectable PSA post surgery. To assess Prostate-specific antigen(PSA)-progression free survival and prostate cancer specific survival for patients treated by chemohormonal therapy followed by salvage surgery for biopsy proven androgen-dependent high-risk locally recurrent prostate cancer following radiation therapy. (NCT01531205)
Timeframe: Four Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental: Drug and Hormonal Therapy With Salvage Surgery0

[back to top]

Surgical Margin Negative Rate (SM Rate)

Post surgery percentage of participants with negative surgical margin. To determine the surgical margin negative rate in patients who have undergone chemohormonal therapy followed by surgery for biopsy proven androgen-dependent high risk locally recurrent prostate cancer following primary radiation therapy. Margin: The edge or border of the tissue removed in cancer surgery. The margin is described as negative or clean when the pathologist finds no cancer cells at the edge of the tissue, suggesting that all of the cancer has been removed. The margin is described as positive or involved when the pathologist finds cancer cells at the edge of the tissue, suggesting that all of the cancer has not been removed. (NCT01531205)
Timeframe: One Year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental: Drug and Hormonal Therapy With Salvage Surgery100

[back to top]

Incidence of Detecting Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC)

To determine the feasibility of detecting circulating tumor cells in this patient population. CTC results per patient in milliliters. (NCT01531205)
Timeframe: One Year

,
InterventionCTC/mL (Number)
Baseline CTC/mL1 Month CTC/mL3 Month CTC/mLBaseline CTC Clusters/mL1 Month CTC Clusters/mL3 Month CTC Clusters/mLBaseline Apop/mL1 Month Apop/mL3 Month Apop/mLBaseline Small Cells/mL1 Month Small Cells/mL3 Month Small Cells/mLBaseline CK-CTC/mL1 Month CK-CTC/mL3 Month CK-CTC/mL
Participant One212710281110003018
Participant Two16NA02NA14NA00NA01NA

[back to top]

Hemoglobin A1c

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

,
Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT6.126.336.30
TAK-700 + ADT + RT6.015.956.04

[back to top]

Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From registration to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Garde 4Grade 5
ADT + RT17543143
TAK-700 + ADT + RT2455591

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Clinical Survivorship Events

"Clinical survivorship events are defined as the following newly diagnosed non-fatal cardiovascular events or other clinical endpoints relevant to prostate cancer survivorship:~type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and osteoporotic fracture." (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Type 2 diabetesCoronary artery diseaseMyocardial infarctionStrokePulmonary embolismDeep vein thrombosisOsteoporotic fracture
ADT + RT3016651086
TAK-700 + ADT + RT181486571

[back to top]

Serum High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT40.9144.9442.16
TAK-700 + ADT + RT41.3244.5044.85

[back to top]

Serum High-density Lipoprotein (LDL)

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT88.7886.1881.35
TAK-700 + ADT + RT87.8583.7395.34

[back to top]

Serum Testosterone

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline,12 months, 24 months

,
Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT355.7535.6886.47
TAK-700 + ADT + RT357.7325.2217.36

[back to top]

Testosterone Recovery at 12 and 24 Months

Testosterone recovery is defined as testosterone level after treatment greater than 230 ng/dL. Time to testosterone recovery is defined as time from randomization to the date of testosterone recovery, biochemical, local, or distant failure (competing risk), salvage therapy (competing risk), death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Testosterone recovery rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From registration to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 months24 months
ADT + RT19.432.9
TAK-700 + ADT + RT12.517.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol)

Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from secondary (original protocol) to primary. Biochemical failure will be defined by the Phoenix definition (PSA ≥ 2 ng/ml over the nadir PSA, the presence of local, regional, or distant recurrence, or the initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT17.3
TAK-700 + ADT + RT12.8

[back to top]

Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form at One Year

The PROMIS Fatigue short form 8a contains 8 questions, each with 5 responses ranging from 1 to 5, evaluating self-reported fatigue symptoms over the past 7 days. The total score is the sum of all questions which is then converted into a pro-rated T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with a possible range of 33.1 to 77.8. Higher scores indicate more fatigue. Change is defined as value at one year - value at baseline. Positive change from baseline indicates increased fatigue at one year. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, one year

InterventionT-score (Mean)
ADT + RT2.78
TAK-700 + ADT + RT3.16

[back to top]

Median Testosterone Recovery Time

Testosterone recovery is defined as testosterone level after treatment greater than 230 ng/dL. Testosterone recovery rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, censoring for biochemical, local, or distant failure, salvage therapy, death, and otherwise alive without event. Testosterone recovery time is defined as time from randomization to testosterone recovery or censoring. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionyears (Median)
ADT + RTNA
TAK-700 + ADT + RTNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Death Due to Prostate Cancer

Time to prostate cancer death is defined as time from randomization to the date of death due to prostate cancer, last known follow-up (censored), or death due to other causes (competing risk). Failure rates were to be estimated using the cumulative incidence method. If too few events occur for meaningful estimates, then only counts of events will be reported. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ADT + RT1
TAK-700 + ADT + RT0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastases

Distant metastases (failure) is defined as imaging or biopsy demonstrated evidence for systemic recurrence. Biopsy was not required, however it was encouraged in absence of a rising PSA. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. Note, the protocol lists this endpoint as regional or distant metastasis, but regional progression data was not collected. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT6.8
TAK-700 + ADT + RT2.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With General Clinical Treatment Failure

General clinical treatment failure (GCTF) is defined as: PSA > 25 ng/ml, documented local disease progression, regional or distant metastasis, or initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Failure time is defined as time from registration to the date of failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT12.5
TAK-700 + ADT + RT6.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events

Time to grade 3 or higher adverse event (event) is defined as time from randomization to the date of first event, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Event rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT34.9
TAK-700 + ADT + RT58.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Local Progression

Local recurrence (failure) is defined as biopsy proven recurrence within the prostate gland. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates reported.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT2.9
TAK-700 + ADT + RT0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Alive [Overall Survival] (Primary Endpoint of Original Protocol)

Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from primary (original protocol) to secondary. Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. 5-year rates are provided. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT89.4
TAK-700 + ADT + RT88.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)

Body Mass Index (BMI) is a person's weight in kilograms (or pounds) divided by the square of height in meters (or feet). Change from baseline = time point value - baseline value. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline and yearly to five years.

,
Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
1 year2 years3 years4 years5 years
ADT + RT0.640.670.75-0.02-0.52
TAK-700 + ADT + RT-0.84-0.340.250.460.15

[back to top]

Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One Year

The EPIC-Short Form is a 26-item, validated self-administered tool to assess disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and its therapies consisting of five summary domains (bowel, urinary incontinence, urinary irritation/obstruction, sexual, and hormonal function). Responses for each item form a Likert scale which are transformed to a 0-100 scale. A domain score is the average of the transformed domain item scores, ranging from 0-100 with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Change at one year is defined as one-year value - baseline value. Positive change at one year indicates improved quality of life. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, one year

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Bowel domainUrinary domainSexual domainHormonal domain
ADT + RT-5.45-1.67-24.18-17.31
TAK-700 + ADT + RT-7.04-5.31-27.26-17.45

[back to top]

Fasting Plasma Glucose

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT98.99102.27104.24
TAK-700 + ADT + RT100.52117.39105.51

[back to top]

Fasting Total Cholesterol

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT149.71160.27163.20
TAK-700 + ADT + RT154.20154.74160.61

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Maintaining Biochemical Castration

Patients with serum total testosterone (STT) level lower than 0.5 ng/mL after 6 months of treatment. (NCT01673984)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Decapeptyl® SR 22.5mg92.9
Current 3-monthly LHRH Agonist100

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Patient Satisfaction With Medication Using Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM Version II)

TSQM comprised of four dimensions: effectiveness, side effects, convenience and overall global satisfaction. Each score ranged from 0 to 100. For effectiveness, convenience and overall global satisfaction scores, 0 indicated an extreme dissatisfaction and 100 indicated an extreme satisfaction. For side effects score, 0 indicated an extreme dissatisfaction and 100 indicated no dissatisfaction at all. (NCT01673984)
Timeframe: 6 and 12 month

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline to 6 months - Effectiveness (n= 13, 7)Baseline to 12 months - Effectiveness (n= 3, 2)Baseline to 6 months - Side Effects (n= 13, 7)Baseline to 12 months - Side Effects (n= 3, 2)Baseline to 6 months - Convenience (n= 13, 7)Baseline to 12 months - Convenience (n= 3, 2)Baseline to 6months -Global Satisfaction(n= 12, 6)Baseline to 12months -Global Satisfaction(n= 2, 2)
Current 3-monthly LHRH Agonist13.1-12.54.812.52.02.8-4.24.2
Decapeptyl® SR 22.5mg3.2-33.3-2.6-25.04.7-1.9-0.7-12.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Demonstrating Stable Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Levels

Stable PSA level was noted as value either lower or less than 25% higher than the baseline value, or PSA value ≤0.5 ng/mL higher than the baseline value, if value ≥25% higher than the baseline value. (NCT01673984)
Timeframe: 6 and 12 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6 months (n = 13, 7)12 months (n = 2, 1)
Current 3-monthly LHRH Agonist100100
Decapeptyl® SR 22.5mg84.650

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Using EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels [EQ-5D-5L] Questionnaire.

The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire consisted of a description of raw data which comprised of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Each dimension had five levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The visual analogical scale of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire was numbered from 0 to 100 (0 meaning the worst health the patient can imagine and 100 the best health the patient can imagine). (NCT01673984)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Decapeptyl® SR 22.5mg71.7
Current 3-monthly LHRH Agonist70.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Maintaining Biochemical Castration After 12 Months of Treatment.

Patients with serum total testosterone (STT) level lower than 0.5 ng/mL, 12 months after randomisation.. (NCT01673984)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Decapeptyl® SR 22.5mg22.2
Current 3-monthly LHRH Agonist25.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Changed Injection Frequency After Completion of the Study

(NCT01673984)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Decapeptyl® SR 22.5mg80
Current 3-monthly LHRH Agonist0

[back to top]

Distant Recurrence-Free Survival (DRFS)

Time from date of registration to date of invasive distant disease recurrence, second invasive primary cancer (breast or not) or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive who have not experienced distant recurrence, or second primary cancer are censored at their last contact date. The results were presented as 5-year DRFS estimate. (NCT01674140)
Timeframe: 5 years after last accrual

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo75.7
Everolimus76.9

[back to top]

Toxicity Based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0, Assessed up to 10 Years.

Toxicity based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Only adverse events that are possibly, probably, or definitely related to study drug are reported. (NCT01674140)
Timeframe: Every 6 weeks while on protocol therapy. Adverse events (AEs) that occurred during follow up after protocol treatment were reported as late AEs, for every 6 months for the first 2 years and then yearly until 10 years after registration.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Abdominal painAlanine aminotransferase increasedAllergic reactionAnemiaAnxietyAppendicitisAppendicitis perforatedArthralgiaAscitesAspartate aminotransferase increasedBack painBone painBreast infectionCardiac arrestCholecystitisCholesterol highColitisCoughDehydrationDepressionDiarrheaDizzinessDyspneaEdema faceEdema limbsEye disorders - Other, specifyEye infectionFatigueFeverGallbladder infectionGallbladder perforationGastrointestinal disorders - Other, specifyGeneral disorders and admin site conditions - OtherGeneralized muscle weaknessHeadacheHeart failureHip fractureHot flashesHyperglycemiaHyperhidrosisHyperkalemiaHypertensionHypertriglyceridemiaHypokalemiaHyponatremiaHypophosphatemiaHypoxiaImmune system disorders - Other, specifyInfections and infestations - Other, specifyInfusion related reactionInsomniaInvestigations - Other, specifyIrregular menstruationJoint infectionKidney infectionLeft ventricular systolic dysfunctionLipase increasedLung infectionLymphedemaLymphocyte count decreasedMenorrhagiaMucositis oralMuscle weakness lower limbMuscle weakness upper limbMusculoskeletal and connective tiss disorder - OtherMyalgiaNasal congestionNauseaNeck painNervous system disorders - Other, specifyNeuralgiaNeutrophil count decreasedObesityOtitis mediaPainPain in extremityPapulopustular rashParoxysmal atrial tachycardiaPeriorbital edemaPeripheral sensory neuropathyPlatelet count decreasedPleural effusionPneumonitisPortal vein thrombosisPostoperative hemorrhageProductive coughPruritusPsychiatric disorders - Other, specifyPulmonary edemaRadiation recall reaction (dermatologic)Rash acneiformRash maculo-papularRash pustularRespiratory failureSepsisSeromaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders - OtherSkin infectionSkin ulcerationSoft tissue infectionSore throatSuicidal ideationSuicide attemptThromboembolic eventTooth infectionUpper respiratory infectionUrinary tract infectionVascular access complicationVomitingWeight gainWeight lossWhite blood cell decreasedWound complicationWound dehiscenceWound infection
Everolimus74210012516016019123213271111231112114410332115355212151311122061360601012121012201001022427111201214207138221115112110220546
Placebo1100120101101100100030200006000000100210064000004000100012051201000011031011010110100011000001000300000300101202010

[back to top]

Invasive Disease-Free Survival (IDFS)

Time from date of registration to date of first invasive recurrence (local, regional or distant), second invasive primary cancer (breast or not), or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive who have not experienced recurrence or second primary cancer are censored at their last contact date. The results were presented as 5-year IDFS estimate. (NCT01674140)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years post registration

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo74.4
Everolimus74.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Time from date of registration to date of death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive are censored at their last contact date. The results were presented as 5-year OS estimate. (NCT01674140)
Timeframe: 5 years after last accrual

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo85.8
Everolimus88.1

[back to top]

Number of Cryopreserved Embryos

number of blastocytes that can be cryopreserved (NCT01682642)
Timeframe: 1 week after oocyte retrieval

Interventionnumber of cryopreserved embryos (Mean)
Zoladex0.9
Vaporization Only1.6

[back to top]

Good Embryo Quality

The development of the embryo at the time of transfer on day 3. Good quality is defined by more than 7 cells and less then 20% fragmentation on day 3. (NCT01682642)
Timeframe: 3 days after oocyte retrieval

Interventionpercentage of good quality embryos (Number)
Zoladex59.3
Vaporization Only67.3

[back to top]

Total Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Dose

total dose of FSH needed at the end of stimulation (NCT01682642)
Timeframe: 3 weeks

InterventionIUs (Mean)
Zoladex2561
Vaporization Only2303

[back to top]

Pregnancy Rate

The number of ongoing pregnancies obtained which still is the most important issue for the patients. (NCT01682642)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of ongoing pregnancies (Number)
Zoladex39.3
Vaporization Only39.7

[back to top]

Number of Pro Nuclear Cell (2PN)

number of 2PN (NCT01682642)
Timeframe: 1 day after oocyte retrieval

Interventionnumber of pro nuclear cells (Mean)
Zoladex5.4
Vaporization Only5.6

[back to top]

Number of Metaphase II Cells (MII)

number of MII cells retrieved (NCT01682642)
Timeframe: 3 weeks

InterventionMII cells (Mean)
Zoladex8.2
Vaporization Only8.2

[back to top]

Number of Days of Stimulation

number of days needed before follicles in the ovary are mature for oocyte retrieval (NCT01682642)
Timeframe: 3 weeks

Interventiondays (Mean)
Zoladex12.3
Vaporization Only11.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Cell Cycle Arrest at Cycle 1 Day 15 ( PIK3CA Mutant Type Cohort Only)

Complete cell cycle arrest is defined as Ki67 ≤ 2.7% following 2 weeks of neoadjuvant PD 0332991 (NCT01723774)
Timeframe: At cycle 1 day 15 (2 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 2: PIK3CA Mutant Type Cohort16

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a PEPI-0 Score

"Preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) score is derived from four factors assigned a numerical score following neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, including Ki67 expression in the surgical specimen, pathologic tumor size (indicated as T below), lymph node status (indicated as N below), and estrogen receptor (ER) level (indicated as ER Allred below).~PEPI-0 score indicates T1 or T2, N0, Ki67 < 2.7%, ER Allred > 2.~It predicts a low risk of recurrence." (NCT01723774)
Timeframe: At the time of surgery (estimated to be 5 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1: PIK3CA Wild Type Cohort3
Arm 2: PIK3CA Mutant Type Cohort2
Arm 3: Endocrine Resistant Cohort1

[back to top]

Clinical Response Rate

"The clinical response rate is the number of patients whose disease meets the WHO criteria of complete or partial response prior to surgery divided by the total number of eligible patients who began combination neoadjuvant treatment.~Complete Response (CR) is defined as the disappearance of all known disease based on a comparison between the pre-treatment measurements and the measurements taken at the completion of neo-adjuvant therapy (that is, at the end of cycle 4 neo-adjuvant combination therapy). In addition there is no appearance of new lesions.~Partial Response (PR) is defined as a 50% or greater decrease in the product of the bidimensional measurements of the lesion (total tumor size) between the pre-treatment measurements and the measurements taken at the completion of neo-adjuvant therapy (that is, at the end of cycle 4 neo-adjuvant combination therapy). In addition there can be no appearance of new lesions or progression of any lesion." (NCT01723774)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1: PIK3CA Wild Type Cohort21
Arm 2: PIK3CA Mutant Type Cohort10
Arm 3: Endocrine Resistant Cohort16

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Cell Cycle Arrest at Cycle 1 Day 15 (Endocrine Resistant Cohort Only)

Complete cell cycle arrest is defined as Ki67 ≤ 2.7% following 2 weeks of neoadjuvant PD 0332991 (NCT01723774)
Timeframe: At cycle 1 day 15 (2 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 3: Endocrine Resistant Cohort19

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Cell Cycle Arrest at Cycle 1 Day 15 (PIK3CA Wild Type Cohort Only)

Complete cell cycle arrest is defined as Ki67 ≤ 2.7% following 2 weeks of neoadjuvant PD 0332991 (NCT01723774)
Timeframe: At cycle 1 day 15 (2 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1: PIK3CA Wild Type Cohort23

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)

-A pathologic complete response is defined as no histology evidence of invasive tumor cells in the surgical breast specimen and sentinel or axillary lymph nodes. (NCT01723774)
Timeframe: At the time of surgery (estimated to be 5 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1: PIK3CA Wild Type Cohort0
Arm 2: PIK3CA Mutant Type Cohort0
Arm 3: Endocrine Resistant Cohort0

[back to top]

Change in Ki67 Level of Tumor Specimens

To assess Ki67 level on serially collected tumor specimens (NCT01723774)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 day 15 and at time of surgery (approximately 2-4 weeks post completion of cycle 4 - each cycle is 28 days)

,,
Interventionpercentage of Ki67 in tumor sample (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 15At time of surgery
Arm 1: PIK3CA Wild Type Cohort11.7023.00
Arm 2: PIK3CA Mutant Type Cohort0.518.75
Arm 3: Endocrine Resistant Cohort0.972.84

[back to top]

Radiologic Response Rate

"The radiological response rate is the number of patients whose disease meets with WHO criteria for complete or partial response at the evaluation prior to surgery divided by the total number of eligible patients who began combination neo-adjuvant therapy.~Complete Response (CR) is defined as the disappearance of all known disease based on a comparison between the pre-treatment measurements and the measurements taken at the completion of neo-adjuvant therapy (that is, at the end of cycle 4 neo-adjuvant combination therapy). In addition there is no appearance of new lesions.~Partial Response (PR) is defined as a 50% or greater decrease in the product of the bidimensional measurements of the lesion (total tumor size) between the pre-treatment measurements and the measurements taken at the completion of neo-adjuvant therapy (that is, at the end of cycle 4 neo-adjuvant combination therapy). In addition there can be no appearance of new lesions or progression of any lesion." (NCT01723774)
Timeframe: At the end of cycle 4 prior to surgery (estimated to be 16 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1: PIK3CA Wild Type Cohort7
Arm 2: PIK3CA Mutant Type Cohort3
Arm 3: Endocrine Resistant Cohort6

[back to top]

Safety Profile of Study Therapy During Adjuvant Therapy as Measured by Frequency and Grade of Adverse Event

The maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be recorded for each patient using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0 coding scheme, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine patterns. Additionally, the relationship (possibly related, probably related, and definitely related) of the adverse event(s) to the study treatment will be taken into consideration. (NCT01723774)
Timeframe: From start of adjuvant therapy through 30 days after completion of adjuvant therapy (estimated to be 2 years)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 1/2 anemiaGrade 1/2 blurred visionGrade 1/2 watering eyesGrade 1/2 diarrheaGrade 1/2 gastritisGrade 1/2 mucositis oralGrade 1/2 nauseaGrade 1/2 vomitingGrade 1/2 fatigueGrade 1/2 upper respiratory infectionGrade 1/2 bruisingGrade 1/2 aspartate aminotransferase increasedGrade 1/2 lymphocyte count decreasedGrade 3/4 lymphocyte count decreasedGrade 1/2 neutrophil count decreasedGrade 3/4 neutrophil count decreasedGrade 1/2 platelet count decreasedGrade 1/2 white blood cell count decreasedGrade 3/4 white blood cell count decreasedGrade 1/2 hyperglycemiaGrade 1/2 arthralgiaGrade 1/2 alopecia
Adjuvant Continuation1111112111113223112112

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Cell Cycle Arrest

Compare rate of complete cell cycle arrest (defined as Ki67 ≤ 2.7%) arrest between C1D1 and C1D15 (NCT01723774)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 day 1 and cycle 1 day 15 (2 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cycle 1 Day 1 complete cell cycle arrestCycle 1 Day 15 complete cell cycle arrest
Arm 1: PIK3CA Wild Type Cohort823
Arm 2: PIK3CA Mutant Type Cohort416
Arm 3: Endocrine Resistant Cohort019

[back to top]

Change in Ki67 Level of Tumor Specimens

To assess Ki67 level on serially collected tumor specimens (NCT01723774)
Timeframe: Pre-treatment and cycle 1 day 15

,,
Interventionpercentage of Ki67 in tumor sample (Mean)
Pre-treatmentCycle 1 Day 15
Arm 1: PIK3CA Wild Type Cohort29.758.18
Arm 2: PIK3CA Mutant Type Cohort19.760.51
Arm 3: Endocrine Resistant Cohort33.5215.27

[back to top]

Radiographic or Clinical Progression

To evaluate the number of men treated per the bipolar androgen therapy phase of the trial who developed radiographic or clinical progression. Radiographic progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Clinical progression was defined as new symptoms that can be attributed to progressive prostate cancer (e.g. new/worsening pain, urinary obstruction, cord compression, bone fractures). (NCT01750398)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients with radiographic/clinical progressionPatients without radiographic/clinical progression
ADT Plus IM Testosterone623

[back to top]

Quality of Life Survey

"To measure quality of life through the RAND-SF36 (short-form 36 questionnaire) Quality of Life Survey, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate Cancer (FACT-P), the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and a visual pain scale. Note that for all scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life/function, with the exception being the visual pain scale, where a higher score indicates more pain.~RAND-SF36: SF-36 is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures. Range is from 0 to 100.~FACT-P: A tool used for assessing the health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Range is from 0 to 156.~IIEF: Is a measure of erectile function. Range is from 5 to 25. IPSS: A tool used to measure symptoms related to prostatic disease. Range is from 0 to 35.~Visual pain scale: A tool used to track pain level. Range is from 0 to 10." (NCT01750398)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Change in SF-36 after round 1 of BATChange in FACT-P after round 1 of BATChange in IIEF after round 1 of BATChange in IPSS after round 1 of BAT
ADT Plus IM Testosterone3.23.5100

[back to top]

Complete PSA Response

To evaluate the number of patients who achieve a complete PSA response (i.e. serum PSA <0.2 ng/ml) at the end of the study (NCT01750398)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients with PSA <0.2 ng/mlPatients with PSA ≥0.2 ng/ml
ADT Plus IM Testosterone326

[back to top]

Change in Weight

Change in weight is measured from baseline to 6 months (i.e. following ADT lead in) and from 6 months to 9 months (i.e. from post-ADT to the end of cycle 1 of BAT). (NCT01750398)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months and 9 months.

Interventionkg (Mean)
Following ADT lead inFollowing round 1 of BAT
ADT Plus IM Testosterone2.081.21

[back to top]

Patients With PSA <4 ng/mL at the End of the Study

To determine the clinical effects of BAT in men with recurrent prostate cancer as first line therapy. This will be accomplished by assessing the number of patients achieving a PSA <4 ng/ml at the end of the trial. (NCT01750398)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ADT Plus IM Testosterone17

[back to top]

Change in C-telopeptides

Change in c-telopeptides following Round 1 of BAT (9 months) compared to the timepoint immediately following the ADT Lead-In (6 months) (NCT01750398)
Timeframe: 6 months and 9 months

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
ADT Plus IM Testosterone-159.77

[back to top]

Change in Waist Circumference

(NCT01750398)
Timeframe: Bseline, 6 months and 9 months.

Interventioncm (Mean)
Following ADT lead inFollowing round 1 of BAT
ADT Plus IM Testosterone3.9-1.09

[back to top]

Pathological Complete Response Rate

Any woman whose Ki67 value ≤10% on cycle 1 day 17 of combination treatment who does not receive alternative treatment prior to surgery and has no histologic evidence of invasive tumor cells in the surgical breast specimen and the axillary lymph nodes is considered to have a pathological complete response (pCR). A ninety percent confidence interval for the true pathologic complete response rate will be calculated using the Duffy-Santer approach. (NCT01776008)
Timeframe: At time of surgery (up to 3 weeks after 4, 28-day cycles)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment (MK2206, Anastrozole, Goserelin Acetate)0

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events, Based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0

The maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine patterns. For this endpoint, we are reporting the number of patients that reported a grade 3 or higher graded adverse event during neoadjuvent treatment. A complete list of all reported adverse events is in the Adverse Events section of the report. (NCT01776008)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of Cycle 4 (28 day cycles)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 3+ Adverse EventGrade 4+ Adverse Event
Treatment (MK2206, Anastrozole, Goserelin Acetate)62

[back to top]

Median Percentage of Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes (sTILS)

Percentage of Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes present in the stroma in tissue specimen. (NCT02003209)
Timeframe: 2.8 years

,
Interventionpercentage of TILs (Median)
No pCRpCR
Arm I (Combination Chemotherapy, Surgery, Radiation)1010
Arm II (Chemo, Estrogen Deprivation, Surgery, Radiation)1010

[back to top]

Percent of Patients With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast and Post Therapy Lymph Nodes by Menopausal Status

Proportion of patients with pCR evaluated histologically, and defined as the absence of any invasive component in the resected breast specimen and all resected lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant therapy calculated separately for premenopausal and postmenopausal women. (NCT02003209)
Timeframe: Up to 2.8 years (when all patients completed primary breast surgery)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants with pCR (Number)
Premenopausal WomenPostmenopausal Women
Arm I (Combination Chemotherapy, Surgery, Radiation)44.238.2
Arm II (Chemo, Estrogen Deprivation, Surgery, Radiation)46.245.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Toxicity Categorized According to National Cancer Institute CTCAE Version 4.0

Percentage of patients with grade 1 or higher toxicity from the Cardiac Disorders System Organ Class. (NCT02003209)
Timeframe: Up to 6 weeks post surgery

Interventionpercentage of pts with cardiac toxicity (Number)
Arm I (Combination Chemotherapy, Surgery, Radiation)4.46
Arm II (Chemo, Estrogen Deprivation, Surgery, Radiation)4.46

[back to top]

Percent of Patients With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast and Post Therapy Lymph Nodes

Proportion of patients with pCR evaluated histologically, and defined as the absence of any invasive component in the resected breast specimen and all resected lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant therapy. (NCT02003209)
Timeframe: Up to 2.8 years (when all patients completed primary breast surgery)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I (Combination Chemotherapy, Surgery, Radiation)41.2
Arm II (Chemo, Estrogen Deprivation, Surgery, Radiation)45.8

[back to top]

Percent of Patients With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast

Proportion of patients with pCR in the breast, defined as the absence of any invasive component in the resected breast specimen. (NCT02003209)
Timeframe: Up to 2.8 years (when all patients completed primary breast surgery)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I (Combination Chemotherapy, Surgery, Radiation)44.4
Arm II (Chemo, Estrogen Deprivation, Surgery, Radiation)47.1

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

Time to Treatment Failure from date of first treatment to date off treatment or date patient is taken off study for any reason. TTF will be estimated with standard K-M methodology. Point and CI estimates of the median and various time point-specific rates will be derived from the K-M life table. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 6 years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)8.2
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)20.6

[back to top]

The Percentage of Patients Responding

Point estimates will be calculated and CI estimates will be derived from the Wilcoxon method using STATA software. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of response at 6 months (Number)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)86
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)79

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Bone Metastases Progression Free at Six Months

Percentage of patients with bone metastases Progression free at six months using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: assessed at six months

Interventionpercentage not progressed at 6 months (Number)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)91
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)33

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Progression-free at 6 Months

Will be estimated with standard K-M methodology. Point and CI estimates of the six-month rate will be derived from the K-M life table. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: From registration to PSA progression defined by PCWG II criteria or measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, assessed at 6 months

Interventionpercentage progression-free at 6 months (Number)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)92
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)45

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Progression Free at One Year

Percentage of patients progression free at one year using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: assessed at 1 year

Intervention% participants not progressed at 1 year (Number)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)84
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)34

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 2 Years

Overall Survival will be measured from date of registration to death or last follow up. OS will be estimated with standard K-M methodology. Point and CI estimates of the 2-year rate will derived from the K-M life table. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Assessed at 2 years

Interventionpercentage alive at 2 years (Number)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)82
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)54

[back to top]

Number of Participants With PSA Remission Assessed Using the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2) Criteria

Number of Participants with PSA Remission Assessed Using the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2) Criteria specifically at the 7 month time point. The binary endpoint (yes/no) will be summarized with its point estimate (an occurrence rate), and 2-sided Wilson type 95% confidence interval (CI). PSA response rates will be compared by treatment arm in a stratified logistic regression model. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Month 7

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)29
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)16

[back to top]

Achievement of PSA Response Assessed Using PCWG2 Criteria

Will be summarized with point estimates (occurrence rates), and 2-sided Wilson type 95% CIs. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)30
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)17

[back to top]

The Number of Participants With a CTC Response

Will be summarized with point estimates (occurrence rates). A CTC response is defined as any level of CTC < 5 that is maintained or any level of CTC that is reduced from baseline. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Up to month 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)17
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)22

[back to top]

Achievement of Measurable Disease Response

The number of participants with Measurable disease response per RECIST v1.1. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)17
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)17

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Achieve a PSA ≤ 4ng/mL After Seven Months of Protocol Treatment in Each Arm

The primary analysis will be assessment of the proportion of patients who achieve a (Prostate-specific antigen) PSA < 4ng/mL after seven months of protocol treatment in each arm. (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: 28 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ADT Alone16
ADT + Ibrance®32

[back to top] [back to top]

Duration of Therapy

Duration of therapy will be reported to describe tolerability within each arm. (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

Interventionmonths (Mean)
ADT Alone22.4
ADT + Ibrance®22.0

[back to top]

Biochemical Progression-free Survival Rate

12-month biochemical progression-free survival rate will begin from treatment start until the event of biochemical (PSA) progression or death, whichever occurs first. Described by arm using Kaplan-Meier methods. (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12-month26-month (time of last event in Arm 1)43-month (time of last event in Arm 2)
ADT + Ibrance®76.559.433.9
ADT Alone74.745.845.8

[back to top]

Frequency of Treatment Delay

Treatment delays will be reported to describe tolerability within each arm. (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No Treatment delay of BicalutamideTreatment Delay of BicalutamideNo Treatment Delay of PalbociclibTreatment Delay of Palbociclib
ADT + Ibrance®3552119
ADT Alone19100

[back to top]

Frequency of Dose Modification

Dose modifications will be reported to describe tolerability for arm 2 only (Ibrance®) (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No Dose Reduction (Palbociclib 125mg/day)1 Dose Reduction, to Palbociclib 100mg/day2 Dose Reductions, to Palbociclib 75mg/day
ADT + Ibrance®2857

[back to top]

Clinical Progression-free Survival Rate

12-month clinical progression-free survival rate will begin from treatment start until the event of biochemical (PSA) progression or death, whichever occurs first. Described by arm using Kaplan-Meier methods. (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12-month22-month (time of last event in Arm 1)32-month (time of last event in Arm 2)
ADT + Ibrance®83.877.758.5
ADT Alone77.764.864.8

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Who Achieve Undetectable PSA (<0.2ng/mL)

(NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ADT Alone13
ADT + Ibrance®22

[back to top]

Patient-reported Nausea and Anorexia

Nausea and anorexia were measured by The Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Treatment (FAACT)-additional concerns, which had 12 items, all items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4. FAACT-additional concerns subscale score was calculated based on scoring manual. Subscale score ranges from 0 to 48, and higher scores indicate less nausea and anorexia. The primary comparison of patient-reported nausea and anorexia between treatment arms was based on the end of cycle 3 assessment. (NCT02115282)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and end of cycle 3

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat)35.8
Arm B (Exemestane, Placebo)37.0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined to be time from randomization to the earliest documented disease progression as defined by the RECIST criteria, new primary breast cancer, or death without progression. Disease assessment was to continue until disease progression, even after non-protocol anti-cancer therapy was started. Cases with incomplete follow up or without adequate disease evaluations were censored at the date last documented to be free of progression, regardless of whether non-protocol anti-cancer therapy was started or not. Disease progression was based on central review, and defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. In addition, the appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS rate. (NCT02115282)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline, then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation, then every 3 months within 2 years from study entry, every 6 months between 2-5 years and annually between 6-10 years from study entry, until first disease progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat)3.3
Arm B (Exemestane, Placebo)3.1

[back to top]

Time-to-treatment Deterioration (TTD)

Time-to-treatment deterioration (TTD) was defined as time from randomization to disease progression or death or worsening of symptoms, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was assessed per RECIST v1.1. Symptoms deterioration was measured by 6 items (GP1, GP2, GP4, GF7, B1, P2, scored 0-24) from the 8-item FACT-Breast Symptom Index (FBSI). Symptom deterioration was defined as two consecutive available decreases of at least 3 points from baseline using the 6-item FBSI in this trial, and the second visit time was used as the time of symptom deterioration in this case, unless it was the final score, for which one decrease was sufficient. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median TTD and TTD rate at a certain time point. Symptoms were assessed every cycle for the first six months after randomization, every two cycles between 6 months and 1 year. It then were assessed based on the same schedule for tumor assessments until disease progression as specified below. (NCT02115282)
Timeframe: Disease assessed at baseline, then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation, then every 3 months within 2 years from study entry, every 6 months between 2-5 years and annually between 6-10 years from study entry, until first disease progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat)2.9
Arm B (Exemestane, Placebo)2.9

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Objective response rate was defined as number of patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by all randomized patients. Responses were evaluated using the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum diameters), and/or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s). (NCT02115282)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline, then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation, then every 3 months within 2 years from study entry, every 6 months between 2-5 years and annually between 6-10 years from study entry, until first disease progression

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat)4.6
Arm B (Exemestane, Placebo)4.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) was defined to be time from randomization to death from any cause. Cases who were still alive were censored at the date last known alive. (NCT02115282)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months within 2 years from study entry, every 6 months between 2-5 years and annually between 6-10 years from study entry, until death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat)23.4
Arm B (Exemestane, Placebo)21.7

[back to top]

Patient-reported Diarrhea

Diarrhea was measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy for Patients With Diarrhea (FACIT-Diarrhea) subscale form, which had 11 items, all items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4. FACIT-Diarrhea subscale score was calculated based on the scoring manual, subscale score ranges from 0 to 44, and higher score indicates less diarrhea. The primary comparison of patient-reported diarrhea between treatment arms was based on the end of cycle 3 assessment. (NCT02115282)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and end of cycle 3

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat)38.8
Arm B (Exemestane, Placebo)41.5

[back to top]

Patient-reported Fatigue

Fatigue was measured by PROMIS Fatigue short form, it had 7 items and all items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5. The PROMIS Fatigue total score and T score were calculated based on the scoring manual. The total score ranges from 7 to 35, the T score ranges from 29.4 to 83.2, higher scores indicate more fatigue. The PROMIS Fatigue T score was used for arm comparison. The primary comparison of patient-reported fatigue between treatment arms was based on the end of cycle 3 assessment. (NCT02115282)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and end of cycle 3

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat)55.5
Arm B (Exemestane, Placebo)54.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Lysine Acetylation Change in CD45 Blood Mononuclear Cells Between C1D1 and C1D15 and PFS in Patients on Arm A

Peripheral blood samples (PBMCs) were collected prior to therapy and on Days 8 and 15 of cycle 1, for assessment of lysine acetylation, using an assay developed by the Trepel Laboratory, NCI/NIH. CD45 blood mononuclear cells were measured. Patients with lysine acetylation change of 1.5 folds or higher were compared to patients with lysine acetylation change of less than 1.5 folds. (NCT02115282)
Timeframe: Disease assessed at baseline, then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation, then every 3 months within 2 years from study entry, every 6 months between 2-5 years and annually between 6-10 years from study entry, until first disease progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat)- Lysine Acetylation Change>=1.5 Fold2.8
Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat)- Lysine Acetylation Change<1.5 Fold2.7

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Last Question on International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (Randomized Cohort)

The absolute change in score by group from baseline up to month 12 on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was used to measure the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile function. The last question on the IPSS can be looked at separately from the total score as it asks the participants to rate the overall quality of life due to their existing urinary symptoms on a scale of 0-6, with lower scores indicating a better quality of life. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)0
Arm II (STAND Clinic)0

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Scores (Randomized Cohort)

"The absolute change in scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) from baseline after 12 months of study participation for participants was used to measure depression symptoms with a higher number indicating a greater percentage of change in scores. The total Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score is calculated by combining the responses of the participant on questions addressing how bothered the participant has been by various problems over the past 2 weeks. Each of the 9 items is scored on a scale of 0 (Not bothered at all) to 4 (Nearly every day). A total score of 5-9='Mild Depression Symptoms, 10-4=Minor Depression, Major Depression (mild), or Dysthymia, 15-19=Major Depression, moderately severe, and >20=Major Depression.~Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test." (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)0
Arm II (STAND Clinic).50

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Insulin Resistance Score (Randomized Cohort)

Metabolic and cardiac impact for participants in the randomized cohort was measured by calculating the absolute change in insulin resistance scores from the baseline to the month 12 assessment. Insulin resistance scores were calculated using the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR). This calculation marks for both the presence and extent of any insulin resistance that participants might currently express. The HOMA-IR is an assessment using insulin and glucose lab values to generate an insulin resistance score. A healthy score range is 1.0 (0.5-1.4). A score of less than 1.0 means you are insulin-sensitive which is optimal. A score above 1.9 indicates early insulin resistance. A score above 2.9 indicates significant insulin resistance. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)0
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-0.5

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Attention Function Index (AFI) Scores (Randomized Cohort)

The AFI measures a participants perceived effectiveness in functioning at time of assessment. Each of the 16 items consists of a 100 mm horizontal line anchored with opposite phrases from not at all (0 mm) to extremely well or a great deal (100 mm). Subjects are asked to place a mark on the line that best describes functioning in relation to specific activity. Scores for each item are determined by measuring distance from lower end of scale in millimeters. The total score on the instrument is computed by obtaining an average of 16 scales. The absolute change in score by group from baseline up to month 12 in Attention Function Index was used to measure perceived effectiveness in common activities requiring attention and working memory in daily life with a higher number indicating a greater absolute change in scores. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)2.31
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-4

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Average Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) as Measured by an Ambulatory Accelerometer Assessment (Randomized Cohort)

"Metabolic impact for participants in each group from baseline to 12 months was measured by using an ambulatory accelerometer worn by participants around their waist for 7 consecutive days. Participants were required at least 3 days of valid wear time, defined as >= 10 hours of wear per day. The accelerometer measured movement intensity and recorded vertical acceleration as counts, providing an indication of the intensity of physical activity associated with locomotion. Non-wear time was identified using Troiano 2007 default settings in the ActiLife v6.13.3 software. The amount of time participants were engaged in moderate to vigorous physical activities (MVPA) was measured by accelerometer as counts per minute (moderate activity = 2020-5998 counts per minute, and vigorous activity = 5999 or more counts per minute). Counts are then transformed into minutes per day with a total range of 0-1440 minutes. The median absolute change in average MVPA was compared between the two groups." (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionminutes per day (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)-18.40
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-2.36

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Body Weight (Randomized Cohort)

Metabolic and cardiac impact for participants in the randomized cohort was measured by calculating the absolute change in body weight from the baseline to month 12 assessment. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionkilograms (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)0.8
Arm II (STAND Clinic)2.6

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Hemoglobin A1c (Randomized Cohort)

Metabolic and cardiac impact for participants in the randomized cohort was measured by calculating the absolute change in percentage hemoglobin A1c from the baseline to the month 12 assessment. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)-0.1
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-0.1

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Percentage Body Fat Mass as Measured by Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer (Randomized Cohort)

The absolute change from baseline in percentage body fat after 12 months of study participation for participants in the randomized cohort was measured using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer and between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of body fat mass (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)-1
Arm II (STAND Clinic)6.8

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Percentage of Body Fat (Randomized Cohort)

Metabolic and cardiac impact for participants in the randomized cohort was measured by calculating the absolute change in percentage of body fat from the baseline to the month 12 assessment. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of body fat (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)-1
Arm II (STAND Clinic)6.8

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Serum 25-(OH) Vitamin D (Randomized Cohort)

The absolute change in bone health parameters as measured by the serum 25-(OH) vitamin D level from the baseline to the month 12 assessment. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)3.60
Arm II (STAND Clinic)8.10

[back to top]

Absolute Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (Randomized Cohort)

The absolute change in score by group from baseline up to month 12 on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was used to measure the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile function with lower numbers indicating less change in symptoms. Seven questions with scores ranging from 1-5 are summed to create a total score. Scores of 1-7 indicate mild symptoms, scores of 8-19 indicate moderate symptoms, and scores of 20-35 indicate severe symptoms. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)2
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants in the Non-randomized, Pilot, Cohort Who Completed Clinic Visits

The percentage of participants in the pilot, non-randomized cohort who completed clinic visits for Supportive Therapy in Androgen Deprivation (STAND) will be reported to assess feasibility. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Non-Randomized Pilot Cohort62.5

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Blood Pressure (Randomized Cohort)

Metabolic and cardiac impact for participants in the randomized cohort was measured by calculating the absolute change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure from the baseline to month 12 assessment. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

,
InterventionmmHg (Median)
Systolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure
Arm I (Standard of Care)102
Arm II (STAND Clinic)9-3

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Bone Density T-score (Randomized Cohort)

The absolute change in bone density t-scores from the baseline to the month 12 assessment for participants in the randomized cohort was measured using bone density at the lumbar spine, bone density at the femoral neck, and bone density at the total hip. A T-score of -1.0 or above is normal bone density. A T-score between -1.0 and -2.5 indicates low bone density or osteopenia. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

,
Interventiont-score (Median)
Bone density at the lumbar spineBone density at the femoral neckBone density of total hip
Arm I (Standard of Care)-2.0-0.25-0.20
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-0.40-0.20-0.10

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26) Scores to Assess Erectile and Urinary Function (Randomized Cohort)

The EPIC-26 was measured at baseline and month 12 to determine the impact of quality of life issues across 5 prostate cancer specific domains: Urinary incontinence, Urinary irritation, Bowel function, Sexual function, and Hormonal function and overall total quality of life. Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale, and the raw score of each item is then transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale. Multiple items are combined and then averaged to form the domain scores and total score at each time point also ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health related quality of life (HRQOL). Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
TotalUrinary incontinenceUrinary irritationBowel functionSexual functionHormonal Function
Arm I (Standard of Care)-4.910-5.000-12.500
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-3.8505.00-4.17-2.08-17.50

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Fasting Lipids (Randomized Cohort)

Metabolic and cardiac impact for participants in the randomized cohort was measured by calculating the absolute change in fasting lipids which includes total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein, High density lipoprotein, and triglycerides levels from the baseline to the month 12 assessment. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

,
Interventionmilligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (Median)
Total CholesterolLow density lipoproteinHigh density lipoproteinTriglycerides
Arm I (Standard of Care)4-4519
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-1-47-3

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Hours Per Week of Physical Activity Category as Measured by the Exercise Pattern Assessment (Randomized Cohort)

Metabolic impact for participants from baseline to 12 months was measured using an exercise pattern questionnaire. The questionnaire measured self-reported average total time per week over the past year the participant participated in various physical activities such as walking, tennis, yoga, swimming, etc. Twelve response options for each activity are as follows: None, 1-4 minutes (min), 5-19 min, 20-39 min, 40-89 min, 1.5 hours, 2-3 hours, 4-6 hours, 7-10 hours, 11-20 hours, 21-30 hours, 31-40 hours, 40+ hours. The amount of time per week spent on each activity was converted to a hourly scale and the absolute change between baseline and month 12 times were calculated for each participant. The median absolute change in hours per week were compared for each of the 6 activity categories: non-vigorous, moderate, moderate-vigorous, vigorous, and total physical activity and total moderate and vigorous activity combined. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

,
Interventionhours per week (Median)
Non-vigorous physical activityModerate physical activityVigorous physical activityTotal physical activityTotal Moderate-Vigorous physical activity (MVPA)
Arm I (Standard of Care)-0.620.00-0.20-.30-0.30
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-1.030.00-0.02-.90-0.08

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Lee Fatigue Scale Scores (Randomized Cohort)

"The absolute change in Lee Fatigue Scale from baseline to month 12 was used to measure the impact of Fatigue on a participants quality of life. The scale consists of 18 items relating to the subjective experience of fatigue. Each item asks respondents to place an X representing how they currently feel, along a visual analogue line that extends between two extremes (e.g., from not at all tired to extremely tired). Each line is 100 mm in length - thus, scores fall between 0 and 100. The instrument also possesses two subscales: fatigue (items 1-5 and 11-18) and energy (items 6-10). The fatigue subscale score is calculated as the mean of the 13 fatigue items, and the energy subscale score is the mean of the 5 energy items. Higher scores on the fatigue subscale represent greater fatigue severity, and higher scores on the energy subscale indicate higher levels of energy. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test." (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Fatigue ScaleEnergy Scale
Arm I (Standard of Care)5.68-0.10
Arm II (STAND Clinic)3.151.30

[back to top]

Absolute Change in the 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Assessment Item Scores for Patients in the Randomized Cohort

The SF-12 is a 12-item questionnaire used to assess generic health outcomes from the patient's perspective. The SF-12 consists of a subset of 12 items from the SF-36® Health Survey (SF-36) and measures two composite outcomes assessing mental health composite score (MCS) and physical health composite scores (PCS). The PCS & MCS are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health. The absolute change in item score by group from baseline up to 12 months was used to assess the quality of life/psychosocial impact on the patients with a larger scores indicating a greater degree of change on physical and mental health. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Mental Composite ScorePhysical Composite Score
Arm I (Standard of Care)4.81-2.90
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-2.37-1.60

[back to top] [back to top]

Absolute Change in Waist Circumference (Randomized Cohort)

Metabolic and cardiac impact for participants in the randomized cohort was measured by calculating the absolute change in waist circumference from the baseline to the month 12 assessment. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventioncentimeters (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)5
Arm II (STAND Clinic)1.7

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Local Assessment

ORR is the percentage of participants with the best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. CR = Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. (NCT02278120)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 25 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
LEE011 + NSAI/Tamoxifen + Goserelin40.9
LEE011 Placebo + NSAI/Tamoxifen+ Goserelin29.7

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

Percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) lasting 24 weeks or longer as defined in RECIST 1.1.CR = Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease: PD = At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20% the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (NCT02278120)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 25 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
LEE011 + NSAI/Tamoxifen + Goserelin79.1
LEE011 Placebo + NSAI/Tamoxifen+ Goserelin69.7

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) Per Investigator's Assessment - Patients With Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)

Time from the first documented response (CR or PR) to the first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer (NCT02278120)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 25 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
LEE011 + NSAI/Tamoxifen + Goserelin21.3
LEE011 Placebo + NSAI/Tamoxifen+ Goserelin17.5

[back to top]

Time to Response (TTR) Per Local Investigator's Assessment

Time to response is the time from the date of randomization to the first documented response (CR or PR, which must be confirmed subsequently) according to RECIST 1.1. All patients will be included in time to response calculations. Patients who do not achieve a confirmed response will be censored at the maximum follow-up time (i.e. first patient first visit to last patient last visit used for the analysis) for patients who had a PFS event (i.e. either progressed or died due to any cause) or at the date of last adequate tumor assessment otherwise. (NCT02278120)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 25 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
LEE011 + NSAI/Tamoxifen + GoserelinNA
LEE011 Placebo + NSAI/Tamoxifen+ GoserelinNA

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Investigator's Assessment

PFS, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause and assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1]. PFS was assessed via a local radiology assessment according to RECIST 1.1 (NCT02278120)
Timeframe: Up to approximatley 25 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
LEE011 + NSAI/Tamoxifen + Goserelin23.8
LEE011 Placebo + NSAI/Tamoxifen+ Goserelin13.0

[back to top]

Time to Radiographic Progression

Log rank test will be used to compare the distributions of above variables between the group treated with enzalutamide to the group on standard ADT. (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the earliest objective evidence of radiographic progression as defined per protocol, assessed up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug

InterventionMonths (Mean)
Arm I (Enzalutamide)NA
Arm II (ADT)11.474

[back to top]

Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Scores, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P) and Sexual Health in Men (SHIM)

"The FACT-P is the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate and measures physical/emotional quality of life in prostate cancer patients.~NUMBER OF ITEMS:39 PATIENT POPULATION:Prostate cancer patients 18 years and older RECALL PERIOD:Past 7 days RESPONSE SCALE:5 point Likert-type scale~SUBSCALE DOMAINS:~Physical Well-Being (PWB), Social/Family Well-Being (SWB), Emotional Well-Being (EWB), Functional Well-Being (FWB), Prostate Cancer Subscale (PCS)~SCORING:~Scores range from 0-158. In general, the higher the score, the better the quality of life.~Sexual Health in Men (SHIM). 5 item measure of erectile function. Total score is 1-25 with a higher score indicating better sexual health. Scores: no ED (SHIM total score, 22-25), mild (17-21), mild to moderate (12-16), moderate (8-11), and severe ED (1-7)." (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 7 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
SHIMFACT-P
Arm I (Enzalutamide)-3.71-4.5
Arm II (ADT)-3.4-1.93

[back to top]

Change in Markers of Inflammation, as Measured by Circulating Hs-CRP

Mean change in available samples from baseline to 12 months, presented in mg/dL (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Difference between baseline and 12 months.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Arm I (Enzalutamide)0.87
Arm II (ADT)6.42

[back to top]

Change in Bone Turnover Markers, as Measured by Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase

Will be assessed for each treatment group. Measurements will be taken at day 1 of each course. A paired t-test will test within an arm as to whether the change from baseline to 12 months is significantly different from zero. (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 12

Interventionmicrogram/L (Mean)
Arm I (Enzalutamide)-18.55
Arm II (ADT)-58.14

[back to top]

Change in Bone Turnover Markers as Measured by N-telopeptide

Will be assessed for each treatment group. Measurements will be taken at day 1 of each course. A paired t-test within an arm as to whether the change from baseline to 12 months is significantly different from zero. N-Telopeptide units - nM Bone Collagen Equivalent (BCE). (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 months

InterventionnM BCE (Mean)
Arm I (Enzalutamide)-3.05
Arm II (ADT)1.73

[back to top]

Change in Bone Density

"We will measure bone density via a DXA scanner, Left Femur and Right femur T scores will be added to a composite score. A paired t-test will test within an arm as to whether the change from baseline to twelve months is significantly different from zero.~The T-score is the standard deviation of how much bone density differs from the bone mass of an average healthy 30 year old. A score of 0 indicates no deviation from average. The following ranges are used:~T-score of -1.0 or above = normal bone density~T-score between -1.0 and -2.5 = low bone density, or osteopenia~T-score of -2.5 or lower = osteoporosis" (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Enzalutamide-0.23
Androgen Deprivation Therapy0

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events, Using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.1

The incidence of adverse events has been reported in the adverse events log for clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Enzalutamide10
Androgen Deprivation Therapy9

[back to top]

Metabolic Syndrome Incidence, Summarized by the Number of Patients With at Least 3 of the 5 Pre-specified Criteria

Metabolic syndrome will be assessed at the beginning of each course and defined by the presence of 3 of the following five traits: abdominal obesity, defined as a waist circumference > 102 cm (> 40 in); serum triglycerides >= 150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L) or drug treatment for elevated triglycerides; serum high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol < 40 mg/dL (1 mmol/L) or drug treatment for low HDL; blood pressure >= 130/>= 85 mmHg or drug treatment for elevated blood pressure; and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) >= 100 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L) or drug treatment for elevated blood glucose. (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Within the first 12 months of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Enzalutamide)5
Arm II (ADT)3

[back to top]

Change in Physical Function, as Measured by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).

The Short SPPB incorporates 3 validated portions to assess a patient's balance and mobility. SPPB scores range from zero to 12 possible points. SPPB score of 3-9 points in persons with no mobility disability indicates frailty; SPPB score of 10 or greater for persons with no sarcopenia and no mobility disability indicates robustness. The higher the score, the better the physical function. Will be measured as a continuous outcome. (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Difference between baseline and 12 months.

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm I (Enzalutamide)10.58
Arm II (ADT)10.94

[back to top]

Metabolic Syndrome Incidence, Summarized by the Proportion of Patients With at Least 3 of the 5 Pre-specified Criteria

Metabolic syndrome will be assessed at the beginning of each course and defined by the presence of 3 of the following five traits: abdominal obesity, defined as a waist circumference > 102 cm (> 40 in); serum triglycerides >= 150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L) or drug treatment for elevated triglycerides; serum HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dL (1 mmol/L) or drug treatment for low HDL; blood pressure >= 130/>= 85 mmHg or drug treatment for elevated blood pressure; and FPG >= 100 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L) or drug treatment for elevated blood glucose. (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Within the first 6 months of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Enzalutamide)4
Arm II (ADT)0

[back to top]

Number of Patients With PSA Progression

PSA progression as defined by an increase in >= 50% from nadir and an absolute increase of at least 2 ng/mL above the nadir, occurring at least 12 weeks after start of therapy that is confirmed by two consecutive increases taken at least 2 weeks apart. Log rank test will be used to compare the distributions of above variables between the group treated with enzalutamide to the group on standard ADT. (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the earliest objective evidence of PSA progression as defined per protocol, assessed up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Enzalutamide)0
Arm II (ADT)1

[back to top] [back to top]

Median Nuclear Androgen Receptor (AR) Level in Biopsy Specimens Versus Residual Tumors

"The effect of intense androgen suppression and inhibition was measured on tumors using anti-AR immunostains of biopsy and surgical specimens. Detection of tumor nuclear AR was quantified on a per-nucleus basis using computer-aided image analysis with Definiens Developer XD 64, grouping nuclei into high, medium, low, and absent bins, a histology score was assigned to each sample.~Nucleus classification is low vs. med. at 0.7; med. vs. high at 0.95. Definiens reported the total # of positively stained nuclei or cells, along with the distribution of low-, med.-, and high-intensity stained nuclei/cells for ea. tumor focus. A %positive index score was calculated using a weighted avg. divided by the total # of objects, where index = [ (1 × nuclei/cells stained low) + (2 × nuclei/cells stained med.) + (3 × nuclei/cells stained high) ](3 × total nuclei)." (NCT02430480)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionscores on a scale (Median)
biopsy specimenresidual tumor
1/Arm 1- Enzalutamide and Goserelin0.75680.1661

[back to top]

Median Prostate Lesion Volume Before and After Treatment

Prostate lesion volumes on baseline and post-treatment multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) were calculated from T2W-MRI sequences using software embedded in the PACS after manual contouring by the same radiologist. Lesion volume scores were categorized as low (2 or fewer positive sequences), moderate (3 positive sequences) and high (4 positive sequences). Lesion volume values are in cubic centimeters (cc's). (NCT02430480)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventioncubic centimeters (Median)
Baseline6 months
1/Arm 1- Enzalutamide and Goserelin39.520.0

[back to top]

Median Tumor Volume Burden at Baseline Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Before and After Surgery

The prostate lesion is contoured manually by an expert radiologist. Research software (mim-vista) calculates the volume. Greater tumor volumes may indicate higher prostate tumor growth. (NCT02430480)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventioncc (Median)
Baseline6 months
1/Arm 1- Enzalutamide and Goserelin3.440.62

[back to top]

Initial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Percentage of Relative Tumor Volume Sensitivity

The Youden index was used as a measure for evaluating biomarker effectiveness and was calculated to determine the cutoffs that gave the optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity for patient response to treatment. The index is: J=sensitivity + specificity -1. Its value ranges from 0 through 1 (inclusive). A value of 1 indicates that there are no false positives or false negatives, i.e. the test is perfect. The index gives equal weight to false positive and false negative values, so all tests with the same value of the index give the same proportion of total misclassified results. Sensitivity and specificity are the probability of truly identifying relative tumor burden on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) respectively at a statistically established cut point. (NCT02430480)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercentage of sensitivity (Number)
1/Arm 1- Enzalutamide and Goserelin81

[back to top]

Initial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Percentage of Relative Tumor Volume Specificity

The Youden index was used as a measure for evaluating biomarker effectiveness and was calculated to determine the cutoffs that gave the optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity for patient response to treatment. The index is: J=sensitivity + specificity -1. Its value ranges from 0 through 1 (inclusive). A value of 1 indicates that there are no false positives or false negatives, i.e. the test is perfect. The index gives equal weight to false positive and false negative values, so all tests with the same value of the index give the same proportion of total misclassified results. Sensitivity and specificity are the probability of truly identifying relative tumor burden on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) respectively at a statistically established cut point. (NCT02430480)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercentage of specificity (Number)
1/Arm 1- Enzalutamide and Goserelin87

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Complete Response

Complete response was evaluated after neoadjuvant treatment with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and enzalutamide and assessed by pathologic exam. Pathologic complete response: the absence of residual invasive cancer confirmed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). (NCT02430480)
Timeframe: After neoadjuvant treatment with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and enzalutamide, approximately 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1/Arm 1- Enzalutamide and Goserelin2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Reduction in Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog (PTEN) Levels

PTEN level reduction was evaluated using immunohistochemistry in post treatment specimens. For anti-PTEN immunohistochemistry, a case was considered PTEN-reduced (abnormal) if at least 5% of tumor cells demonstrated reduced PTEN intensity relative to PTEN in benign cells (lower than 5%, then abnormal). (NCT02430480)
Timeframe: post treatment, approximately 1-3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1/Arm 1- Enzalutamide and Goserelin21

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)

Here is the number of participants with serious and non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned. (NCT02430480)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 51 months and 2 days.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1/Arm 1- Enzalutamide and Goserelin38

[back to top]

Any Grade 1 Adverse Events in More Than One Patient and Grades 2 -3 Attributable to Research

Adverse events were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). A non-serious adverse event (i.e., Grade 1) is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event (i.e., Grade 2-3) is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in an adverse drug experience, and/or disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions attributable to the research. (NCT02430480)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 51 months and 2 days.

,,
InterventionAdverse events (Number)
FatigueEdema, limbsErectile dysfunctionGynecomastiaHot flashesHypertensionConfusionLibido decreasedInsomniaMood changesPersonality changeRestlessnessHeadacheDizzinessMemory impairmentConcentration impairmentDysuriaUrinary incontinenceDysgeusiaDyspepsiaNauseaCoughSore throatArthralgiaBack painMuscle weaknessMyalgiaRashWeight gain
Grade 1202933412151223255331212432232212
Grade 220301700400100001410000000120
Grade 300100700000000000000000000000

[back to top]

Number of Prostate Lesions Detected Within the Study Population at Baseline Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) and 6 Months After Enzalutamide Plus Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)

Prostate lesion volumes on baseline and post-treatment mpMRI were calculated from T2W-MRI sequences using software embedded in the PACS after manual contouring by the same radiologist. (NCT02430480)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

InterventionLesions (Number)
Baseline6 months
1/Arm 1- Enzalutamide and Goserelin5840

[back to top]

Survival Rate

Overall Survival & Tumor Free Survival (NCT02518191)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionmonths (Mean)
GnRHa Group48.17
None GnRHa Group49.33

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Premature Ovarian Insufficiency

The serum levels of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) were measured using human AMH ELISA kit (11351, Biofine)). POI (premature ovarian insufficiency) was defined as AMH<0.5ng/mL in this study. (NCT02518191)
Timeframe: 1 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
GnRHa (Gonadotrophin-releasing Hormone Analogues) Group10
None GnRHa (Gonadotrophin-releasing Hormone Analogues) Group38

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) at Six Months

Occurrence of Overall Survival at 6 months. OS: On study date to expired date or last visit date if not deceased. (NCT02586675)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tamoxifen and Ribociclib With Goserelin83.3

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Six Months

Occurrence of Progression Survival at 6 months. PFS: On study date to date of progression or the same as overall survival time if not progressed. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. (NCT02586675)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tamoxifen and Ribociclib With Goserelin57.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Safety and Tolerability of Palbociclib in Combination With Neoadjuvant Letrozole and Trastuzumab (or FDA Approved Biosimilar) as Measured by Number of Participants With Grade 3 & 4 Adverse Events

-The descriptions and grading scales found in the revised NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 will be utilized for all toxicity reporting. (NCT02907918)
Timeframe: 30 days after completion of neoadjuvant therapy (approximately 21 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Neutrophil count decreasedLymphocyte count decreasedHypertensionWhite blood cell decreasedColitisHypokalemiaPulmonary edemaVentricular tachycardiaAlanine aminotransferase increasedAspartate aminotransferase increasedColonic obstruction
Palbociclib + Letrozole + Trastuzumab +/- Goserelin131821111111

[back to top]

Change in Patient Reported Outcomes as Measured by NCI PRO-CTCAE

"Answers ranging from None to Very Severe (none=0 to very severe=4); Not at All to Very Much (not at all=0 to very much=4), Never to Almost Constantly (0=never to almost constantly=4)~PRO-CTCAE responses are scored from 0 to 4, and there are no standardized scoring rules yet established for how to combine attributes into a single score or how best to analyze PRO-CTCAE data longitudinally.~PRO-CTCAE scores for each attribute (frequency, severity and/or interference) will be presented descriptively" (NCT02907918)
Timeframe: Baseline, cycle 2 day 1 (approximately 29 days), and end of cycle 4 (approximately 16 weeks)

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
In the last 7 days, what was the severity of your decreased appetite at its worst?In the last 7 days, how much did decreased appetite interfere with your usual or daily activities?In the last 7 days, how often did you have nausea?In the last 7 days, what was the severity of your nausea at its worst?In the last 7 days, what was the severity of your shortness of breath (SOB) at its worst?In the last 7 days, how much did your SOB interfere with your usual or daily activities?In the last 7 days, what was the severity of your cough at its worst?In the last 7 days, how much did your cough interfere with your usual and daily activities?In the last 7 days, how often did you have arm or leg swelling?In the last 7 days, what was the severity of your arm or leg swelling at its worst?In the last 7 days, how much did arm or leg swelling interfere with your usual or daily activities?In the last 7 days, how often did you feel a pounding or racing heartbeat (palpitations)?In the last 7 days, what was the severity of your pounding or racing heartbeat at its worst?In the last 7 days, did you have any rash?In the last 7 days, what was the severity of your dry skin at its worst?In the last 7 days, did you have any hair loss?In the last 7 days, what was the severity of your problems with concentration at their worst?In the past 7 days, how much did problems with concentration interfere with usual/daily activities?
Baseline: Palbociclib + Letrozole + Trastuzumab +/- Goserelin1.34615381.07692311.23076921.19230771.19230770.96153851.19230771.00000001.00000000.88461540.92307691.15384621.03846151.84615381.30769231.07692311.19230771.1538462
Cycle 2 Day 1: Palbociclib + Letrozole + Trastuzumab +/- Goserelin1.34615380.96153851.50000001.42307691.11538461.03846151.23076921.03846151.03846151.03846150.88461541.19230771.19230771.61538461.69230771.11538461.50000001.3076923
End of Cycle 4: Palbociclib + Letrozole + Trastuzumab +/- Goserelin1.30434781.04347831.26086961.21739131.43478261.1739131.52173911.30434781.26086961.13043481.04347831.1739131.13043481.8260871.56521741.60869571.47826091.3478261

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)

A pathologic complete response (pCR) is defined as no histology evidence of invasive tumor cells in the surgical breast specimen and sentinel or axillary lymph nodes. (NCT02907918)
Timeframe: Completion of 4 cycles of treatment (approximately 16 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Palbociclib + Letrozole + Trastuzumab +/- Goserelin2

[back to top]

Time-to-Progression (TTP) Based on Investigator's Assessment (Core Phase)

"Time to progression (TTP) is defined as time from date of start of treatment to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. Participants with symptoms of rapidly progressing disease without radiologic evidence were classified as progression only when clear evidence of clinical deterioration was documented and/or patient discontinued due to 'Disease progression' or death due to study indication. When there was no documentation of radiologic evidence of progression, and the patient discontinued for 'Disease progression' due to documented clinical deterioration of disease, the date of discontinuation was used as date of progression.~TTP was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 95% CI of median was calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley method." (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide27.1

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) Based on Investigator's Assessment (Core Phase)

"Overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1 based on investigator's assessment.~CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.~95% CI was calculated using the exact binomial method." (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide29.3

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Based on Investigator's Assessment (Core Phase)

"Clinical benefit rate (CBR) is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR), or partial response (PR) or an overall lesion response of stable disease (SD), lasting as per local review, for a duration of at least 24 weeks. CR, PR and SD are defined according to RECIST 1.1 based on investigator's assessment.~CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.~SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease.~95% CI was calculated using the exact binomial method." (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide70.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) Score (Core Phase)

"Change from baseline in FACT-B scores was assessed. FACT-B is a self-report instrument that measures multidimensional quality of life (QOL) in patients with breast cancer. The FACT-B consists of 37 questions that address physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, with specific questions relevant to women with breast cancer. Each item has a score range of 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much), with a total score ranging from 0-148. The higher the score, the better the QOL reported by the participant. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in QoL.~Due to the nature of the questionnaire, only females were asked to complete this questionnaire." (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: On Day 1 of Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4 ,5, 6, 8, 10, 12 and after that every 3 cycles, and End of treatment, assessed up to 33 months. Cycle=28 days

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 6 Day 1Cycle 8 Day 1Cycle 10 Day 1Cycle 12 Day 1Cycle 15 Day 1Cycle 18 Day 1Cycle 21 Day 1Cycle 24 Day 1Cycle 27 Day 1Cycle 30 Day 1Cycle 33 Day 1End of Treatment
Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide0.20.1-0.30.0-0.8-0.9-1.2-1.6-2.0-2.0-2.0-3.0-2.7-2.012.1-4.1

[back to top]

All Collected Deaths

"On-treatment- Core phase: from first treatment in the Core phase up to 30 days post-treatment (for participants who did not enter the Extension phase) or up to last treatment in the Core phase (for participants who entered the Extension phase). Extension phase: from first dose of treatment in the Extension phase up to 30 days after last dose of treatment.~Post-treatment survival follow-up- Core phase: from 31 days post-treatment in the core phase up to end of study; Extension phase: from 31 days post-treatment in the Extension phase up to end of study." (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: On-treatment Core Phase: up to 33 months; Post-treatment survival Follow-up Core Phase: Up to 33 months; On-treatment Extension Phase: up to approximately 37.6 months; Post-treatment survival Follow-up Extension Phase: Up to approximately 37.6 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
On-treatment Core PhasePost-treatment survival follow-up Core PhaseAll deaths Core PhaseOn-treatment Extension PhasePost-treatment survival follow-up Extension PhaseAll deaths Extension Phase
Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide7490164538

[back to top]

Canadian Sub-study: Proteomic Analysis of Ribociclib and Letrozole Cohort Not Achieving Clinical Benefit Compared to a Cohort Sensitive to Treatment With Ribociclib and Letrozole

Exploratory analysis performed in archival tumor samples collected during screening in the main study. Protein expression levels of the ribociclib plus letrozole cohort that did not achieve clinical benefit (progression within 3 months of treatment) and the cohort sensitive to ribociclib and letrozole (cohort with a time to progression of 22 months or more) were determined using using Single-Pot, Solid-Phase-enhanced, Sample Preparation-Clinical Tissue Proteomics (SP3-CTP). For normalization purposes a pooled internal standard sample, comprised of aliquots of every sample included in the study, was included in each experimental batch. Protein abundances were calculated as the log2 transformed abundances relative to the pooled internal standard. Positive values represent higher protein expression levels compared to the pooled internal standard. Expression levels of proteins that showed association to predicting response to study treatment are presented. (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: Screening (up to 28 days before first dose of study treatment)

,
Interventionlog2 transformed relative ratio (Mean)
Isocitrate dehydrogenase [NADP] cytoplasmic (IDH1)Retinal dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1A1)Coagulation factor XIII A chain (F13A1)Argininosuccinate synthase (ASS1)Heat shock protein beta-1 (HSPB1)Aldehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial (ALDH2)Decorin (DCN)Cathepsin G (CTSG)Pyruvate carboxylase, mitochondrial (PC)C-1-tetrahydrofolate synthase, cytoplasmic (MTHFD1)Collagen alpha-3(VI) chain (COL6A3)Versican core protein (VCAN)Fibulin-1 (FBLN1)Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase, mitochondrial (ACAT1)Long-chain-fatty-acid--CoA ligase 1 (ACSL1)Pigment epithelium-derived factor (SERPINF1)3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, mitochondrial (ACAA2)Fatty acid synthase (FASN)Lumican (LUM)Fibulin-2 (FBLN2)Prolow-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1)Galectin-3-binding protein (LGALS3BP)Inactive tyrosine-protein kinase 7 (PTK7)Ras GTPase-activating-like protein IQGAP2 (IQGAP2)Spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 (SPTAN1)Periostin (POSTN)Procollagen C-endopeptidase enhancer 1 (PCOLCE)CD109 antigen (CD109)Palladin (PALLD)Collagen triple helix repeat-containing protein 1 (CTHRC1)Collagen alpha-1(XII) chain (COL12A1)Matrix-remodeling-associated protein 5 (MXRA5)C-type mannose receptor 2 (MRC2)
Primary Resistance Cohort0.1120.022-0.3780.104-0.5460.319-0.456-0.6340.4130.033-0.186-0.301-0.2450.1350.296-0.3780.258-0.198-0.355-0.208-0.148-0.491-0.2510.3180.085-0.419-0.217-0.213-0.207-0.514-0.302-0.221-0.201
Sensitive Cohort-0.218-0.325-0.010-0.466-0.151-0.077-0.033-0.175-0.004-0.129-0.0150.1410.128-0.074-0.1440.169-0.0800.0380.0100.0750.094-0.1260.070-0.036-0.0820.0510.1840.0430.0500.1760.2300.2050.170

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) During Treatment With Ribociclib + Letrozole in the Core Phase

"AEs were defined as the appearance of (or worsening of any pre-existing) undesirable sign(s), symptom(s), or medical condition(s).~SAEs were defined as meeting at least 1 of the following criteria: is fatal or life-threatening, Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically significant, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. A SAE which caused death of the participant was considered as fatal SAE.~AEs were assessed and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1 to 5 were used to characterize the severity of the Adverse Event. Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening and Grade 5: death related to AE.~A participant with multiple severity grades for an AE is only counted under the maximum grade." (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: From start of treatment up to 30 days after last treatment (for participants who did not enter to the Extension phase) or up to last treatment in the Core phase (for participants who entered the Extension phase), assessed up to approximately 33 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AEs- All gradesAEs- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs- All gradesTreatment-related AEs- Grade ≥ 3SAEs- All gradesSAEs- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related SAEs- All gradesTreatment-related SAEs- Grade ≥ 3Fatal SAEs- All gradesTreatment-related Fatal SAEs- All gradesAEs leading to discontinuation- All gradesAEs leading to discontinuation- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation- All gradesTreatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation-Grade ≥ 3AEs leading to dose adjustment/interruption- All gradesAEs leading to dose adjustment/interruption- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs leading to dose adjustment/interruption- All gradesTreatment-related AEs leading to dose adjustment/interruption- Grade ≥ 3AEs requiring additional therapy- All gradesAEs requiring additional therapy- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs requiring additional therapy- All gradesTreatment-related AEs requiring additional therapy- Grade ≥ 3
Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide32032461309121927025902031786214528310418237243420952235196426248441613392

[back to top]

Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs in the Extension Phase

"AEs were defined as the appearance of (or worsening of any pre-existing) undesirable sign(s), symptom(s), or medical condition(s).~SAEs were defined as meeting at least 1 of the following criteria: is fatal or life-threatening, Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically significant, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization.~AEs were assessed and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1 to 5 were used to characterize the severity of the Adverse Event. Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening and Grade 5: death related to AE.~A participant with multiple severity grades for an AE is only counted under the maximum grade." (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: From first dose of treatment in the Extension phase up to 30 days after last dose of treatment, assessed up approximately 37.6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AEs- All gradesAEs- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs- All gradesTreatment-related AEs- Grade ≥ 3SAEs- All gradesSAEs- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related SAEs- All gradesTreatment-related SAEs- Grade ≥ 3Fatal SAEs- All gradesTreatment-related Fatal SAEs- All gradesAEs leading to discontinuation- All gradesAEs leading to discontinuation- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation- All gradesTreatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation-Grade ≥ 3AEs leading to dose adjustment/interruption- All gradesAEs leading to dose adjustment/interruption- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs leading to dose adjustment/interruption- All gradesTreatment-related AEs leading to dose adjustment/interruption- Grade ≥ 3AEs requiring additional therapy- All gradesAEs requiring additional therapy- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs requiring additional therapy- All gradesTreatment-related AEs requiring additional therapy- Grade ≥ 3
Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide2971592211235445765017974185132134113186564712

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Extension Phase)

Clinical benefit as assessed by the Investigator during Extension phase (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: On Day 1 of every 3 cycles, starting from Cycle 1 of the Extension phase until end of treatment, assessed up to 37.4 months. Cycle= 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 7 Day 1Cycle 10 Day 1Cycle 13 Day 1Cycle 16 Day 1Cycle 19 Day 1Cycle 22 Day 1Cycle 25 Day 1Cycle 28 Day 1Cycle 31 Day 1Cycle 34 Day 1Cycle 37 Day 1Cycle 40 Day 1
Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide41338635332324520018311855514432245

[back to top]

Rate of Grade 3 or Higher Neutropenia

"The descriptions and grading scales found in the revised NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 will be utilized for all toxicity reporting.~Grade 3 neutropenia: <1000-500/mm^3; <1.0-0.5 x 10e9/L~Grade 4 neutropenia: <500/mm^3; <0.5 x 10e9/L" (NCT03007979)
Timeframe: Through the first 29 days of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Palbociclib + Letrozole or + Fulvestrant10

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) for Different Populations - Median Time to Progression or Death With 95% CI [Months]

PFS based on radiologic assessment by investigator using RECIST 1.1 criteria (NCT03096847)
Timeframe: Up to approximately month 25

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort A21.8
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B116.5
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B28.8

[back to top]

Time to 10% Deterioration in EORTC Global Health Status

Time to 10% deterioration in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) global health status (NCT03096847)
Timeframe: up to approximately 10 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort A3.3
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B13.7
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B22.8
Total3.0

[back to top]

All Collected Deaths

On treatment deaths were collected from FPFT up to 30 days after study drug discontinuation, for a maximum duration of 1150 days (approx 3.15 years). (Treatment duration ranged from 2 days to 1120 days). Deaths post treatment survival follow up were collected after the on- treatment period, up to approx. 3.15 years. Patients who didn't die during the on-treatment period and had not stopped study participation at the time of data cut-off (end of study) were censored. (NCT03096847)
Timeframe: on-treatment deaths: up to approx 3.15 years; all deaths: approx 3.15 years

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
on-treatment deathsTotal deaths
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort A667
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B109
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B2660
Total12136

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 of Patient Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Via EORTC QLQ-C30

"The QLQ-C30 is the core questionnaire of the EORTC QLQ, which has been developed for the assessment of the health-related QOL of cancer patients participating in international clinical trials. Using a linear transformation to standardize the raw scores, all scores finally range from 0 to 100, where a higher score represents a higher response level, e.g., a higher (better) level of functioning (applies to the first 6 items, items 1 to 6), but a higher (worse) level of symptoms (applies to the last 9 items, items 7 to 15). There is no aggregated total score, i.e., all scale scores were analyzed separately." (NCT03096847)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline to Week 24

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Global health status - Change from baseline to Week 24 (C7D1)Physical Functioning - Change from baseline to Week 24 (C7D1)Role Functioning - Change from baseline to Week 24 (C7D1)Emotional Functioning - Change from baseline to Week 24 (C7D1)Cognitive Functioning - Change from baseline to Week 24 (C7D1)Social Functioning - Change from baseline to Week 24 (C7D1)Fatigue - Change from baseline to Week 24 (C7D1)Nausea / Vomiting - Change from baseline to Week 24 (C7D1)Pain - Change from baseline to Week 24 (C7D1)Dyspnoea - Change from baseline to Week 24 (C7D1)Insomnia - Change from baseline to Week 24 (C7D1)Appetite loss - Change from baseline to Week 24 (C7D1)Constipation - Change from baseline to Week 24 (C7D1)Diarrhea - Change from baseline to Week 24 (C7D1)Financial Problems - Change from baseline to Week 24 (C7D1)
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort A8.8-3.1-6.6-9.62.7-6.96.30.113.23.84.211.2-2.72.60.2
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B6.1-2.4-3.9-4.61.3-7.05.1-3.910.1-3.75.22.2-2.61.9-1.9
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B111.7-3.6-17-9.42.2-1611.11.115.64.46.76.72.20.0-4.4
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B25.0-2.2-1.3-3.61.1-5.33.9-4.99.0-5.34.91.4-3.62.3-1.4

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) in Women and Men With Hormone Receptor Positiv, HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer Treated With Ribocilib and Letrozole

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) after 24 weeks of treatment as defined by RECIST 1.1 as percentage of patients with Complete Response (CR), Partial response (PR) or Stable disease (SD) lasting 24 weeks or longer as well as patients with Non-complete response, nonprogressive disease (NCRNPD). (NCT03096847)
Timeframe: At 24 weeks after last patient enrolled in trial

,,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
CBR by week 24 (= BOR of CR or PR or SD or NCRNPD(Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR))CBR by week 24 (= BOR of CR or PR or SD or NCRNPD (non-confirmed BOR)
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort A63.271.7
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B157.769.2
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B256.564.3
Total60.869.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

Adverse Events (AEs) were separated into TEAEs (defined as AEs occurring/worsening from first study drug treatment until 30 days after the last study drug treatment) and AEs in the pre-/post-treatment period. (NCT03096847)
Timeframe: Up to Week 72

,,
InterventionNumber of Participants (Number)
Total AEs (i.e., Includes any type of AE.)Serious AEsNon-serious AEsAEs with suspected relationship to ribociclibAEs leading to discontinuation of ribociclibAEs with fatal outcome
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort A31897317302766
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B1255252570
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B215745157144386

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) - Kaplan-Meier Estimates (%, 95% CI)

Overall response rate (ORR) is the best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as defined by RECIST 1.1. (NCT03096847)
Timeframe: At week 24

,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
ORR by week 24 - (BOR of CR or PR) (confirmed)ORR by week 24 - (BOR of CR or PR) (unconfirmed)
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort A22.824.8
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B123.130.8
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B211.716.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) - Number of Censored Participants and Number of Deaths

Overall survival (OS) defined as the time from date of start of treatment to date of death due to any cause. (NCT03096847)
Timeframe: Up to approximatley 38 months

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
No. of censored (no death), nNo. of events (deaths due to any cause), n
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort A24067
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B1179
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B29460

[back to top]

Patient Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Via EORTC BR-23 - Change From Baseline at Week 24 (Cycle 7)

"To evaluate health related quality of life (QoL) via EORTC BR-23. The scoring approach for the QLQ-BR23 is identical in principle to that for the function and symptom scales / single items of the QLQ-C30, i.e., all scores finally range from 0 to 100, where a higher score represents a higher response level, e.g., a higher (better) level of functioning, (applies to the first 4 items, items 1 to 4) but a higher (worse) level of symptoms (applies to the last 4 items, items 5 to 8)." (NCT03096847)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24 (Cycle 7)

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
EORTC QLQ-BR23 BODY IMAGE during the study - change from baseline at cycle 7EORTC QLQ-BR23 SEXUAL FUNCTIONING during the study - change from baseline at cycle 7EORTC QLQ-BR23 SEXUAL ENJOYMENT during the study - change from baseline at cycle 7EORTC QLQ-BR23 FUTURE PERSPECTIVE during the study - change from baseline at cycle 7EORTC QLQ-BR23 SYSTEMATIC THERAPY during the study - change from baseline at cycle 7EORTC QLQ-BR23 BREAST SYMPTOMS during the study - change from baseline at cycle 7EORTC QLQ-BR23 ARM SYMPTOMS during the study - change from baseline at cycle 7EORTC QLQ-BR23 HAIR LOSS during the study - change from baseline at cycle 7
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort A-1.5-1.1-1.9-20-9.43.34.1-22
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B0.20.75.0-14-7.12.2-2.0-15
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B1-0.60.0-17-24-138.3-1.5-17
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B20.40.87.4-12-6.00.9-2.1-14

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) for Different Populations - Kaplan-Meier Estimates (%, 95% CI)

PFS based on radiologic assessment by investigator using RECIST 1.1 criteria (NCT03096847)
Timeframe: At week 24 , week 48 and week 72

,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Kaplan-Meier estimates (%, 95% CI) - Week 24Kaplan-Meier estimates (%, 95% CI) - Week 48Kaplan-Meier estimates (%, 95% CI) - week 72
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort A73.161.954.5
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B167.058.749.6
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B263.847.539.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) - Kaplan-Meier Estimates (%, 95% CI)

Overall survival (OS) defined as the time from date of start of treatment to date of death due to any cause. For the Kaplan-Meier estimates (%, 95% CI), the probability of survival at week 24, 48 and 72 is reported below. (NCT03096847)
Timeframe: At Week 24, Week 48 and Week 72

,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Kaplan-Meier estimates (%, 95% CI) - Week 24Kaplan-Meier estimates (%, 95% CI) - Week 48Kaplan-Meier estimates (%, 95% CI) - Week 72
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort A98.693.389.7
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B1100.087.587.5
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B293.986.181.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) - Median Time to Progression or Death With 95% CI [Months]

Overall survival (OS) defined as the time from date of start of treatment to date of death due to any cause. (NCT03096847)
Timeframe: Up to approximatley 38 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort ANA
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B1NA
Ribociclib + Letrozole Cohort B2NA

[back to top] [back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time interval (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) assessed by local radiologist or investigator, or death (due to any cause), whichever comes first. Progressive Disease (PD) as per RECIST 1.1: at least a 20 percent (%) increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT04478266)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 81 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Letrozole + Palbociclib16.6
Amcenestrant + Palbociclib14.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

Objective response was defined as percentage of participants having a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) according to the RECIST version 1.1 assessed by investigator. As per RECIST 1.1, CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30%decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the Baseline sum diameters. (NCT04478266)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 81 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Letrozole + Palbociclib42.3
Amcenestrant + Palbociclib32.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit

Clinical Benefit was defined as the percentage of participants having a confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) for at least 24 weeks determined by investigator as per RECIST 1.1, from date of randomization until disease progression, or death, or data cut-off date, or initiation of post treatment anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first. As per RECIST 1.1; CR was defined as disappearance of all target, non-target lesions & normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference Baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference smallest sum diameters. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (NCT04478266)
Timeframe: From randomization until disease progression, or death, or data cut-off date, whichever comes first (maximum duration: 81 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Letrozole + Palbociclib82.4
Amcenestrant + Palbociclib76.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the interval (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of documented death (due to any cause). In the absence of observation of death, survival time was censored to last date the participant was known to be alive or at the cut-off date, whichever comes first. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT04478266)
Timeframe: From randomization to the death due to any cause or data cut-off date, whichever comes first (maximum duration: 81 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Letrozole + PalbociclibNA
Amcenestrant + PalbociclibNA

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined as time (in months) from first documented evidence of CR or PR until disease progression determined by investigator as per RECIST 1.1, or start of any anti-cancer therapy, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. For participants with ongoing response at the time of the analysis, DOR was censored at the date of the last valid disease assessment not showing documented progression performed before the initiation of a new anticancer treatment (if any). As per RECIST 1.1, CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the Baseline sum diameters. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT04478266)
Timeframe: From the date of first response of CR or PR until disease progression or death, or start of any anti-cancer therapy or data cut-off date, whichever comes first (maximum duration: 81 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Letrozole + Palbociclib14.0
Amcenestrant + PalbociclibNA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status, provides a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal, and consists of 2 sections: the EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L VAS. The Visual Analogue Scale is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state. LS mean and SE are derived from MMRM model with change from Baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from Baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., each cycle [Cycle 1 up to Cycle 21]) for VAS was reported in this outcome measure. (NCT04478266)
Timeframe: Baseline, overall treatment duration (Cycle 1 up to Cycle 21 [i.e., 81 weeks])

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Letrozole + Palbociclib3.2
Amcenestrant + Palbociclib3.8

[back to top]

12-month Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate

Percentage of participants who were disease progression-free at Month 12 after randomization were reported in this outcome measure. PFS was defined as the time interval (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression as per RECIST 1.1 assessed by local radiologist or investigator, or death (due to any cause), whichever comes first. PD as per RECIST 1.1: at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. The PFS rate at Month 12 was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and provided an estimation of the percentage of participants who were disease progression-free at Month 12 after randomization. (NCT04478266)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Letrozole + Palbociclib68.2
Amcenestrant + Palbociclib65.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Breast Cancer Specific Module (EORTC-QLQ-BR23) Domain Scores

QLQ-BR23: disease-specific Health-related QOL assesses breast cancer impact & side effects of treatment. EORTCQLQ- BR23 contains 23 items: multi-item scales & single-item measures. 4 functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective) & 4 scales related to symptoms of disease or treatment (arm symptoms, breast symptoms, systemic therapy side effects, & upset by hair loss). All items scored 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Scores of all scales transformed from raw scores to linear scales ranging 0-100. Higher score for functional scales=better outcome; higher score for symptoms scales=higher symptom burden. LS mean & SE were derived from MMRM model with change from Baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value & stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from Baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., each cycle [Cycle 1 up to Cycle 21]) for each domain was reported. (NCT04478266)
Timeframe: Baseline, overall treatment duration (Cycle 1 up to Cycle 21 [i.e., 81 weeks])

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Body imageSexual functioningSexual enjoymentFuture perspectiveSystemic therapy side effectsBreast symptomsArm symptomsUpset by hair loss
Amcenestrant + Palbociclib1.1-1.5-8.710.83.7-7.0-1.8-0.2
Letrozole + Palbociclib1.3-1.4-10.411.64.9-7.6-1.9-2.7

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Plasma Concentrations of Palbociclib

Palbociclib plasma concentrations at specified time points were reported. (NCT04478266)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: 3 hr post-dose, Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose, Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose, 3 hr post-dose, Cycle 2 Day 15: pre-dose, Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 4 Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 7 Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 10 Day 1: pre-dose

,
Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1: 3 hr post-doseCycle 1 Day 15: pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: 3 hr post-doseCycle 2 Day 15: pre-doseCycle 3 Day 1: pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: pre-doseCycle 7 Day 1: pre-doseCycle 10 Day 1: pre-dose
Amcenestrant + Palbociclib37.78045.9032.15927.14442.8821.6151.3901.4611.489
Letrozole + Palbociclib36.26582.5413.40930.23472.1764.3014.7672.7163.793

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Plasma Concentrations of Amcenestrant

Amcenestrant plasma concentrations at specified time points were reported. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Letrozole+Palbociclib arm as pre-specified in protocol. (NCT04478266)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: 3 hours (hr) post-dose, Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose, Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose, 3 hr post-dose, Cycle 2 Day 15: pre-dose, Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 4 Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 7 Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 10 Day 1: pre-dose

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1: 3 hr post-doseCycle 1 Day 15: pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: 3 hr post-doseCycle 2 Day 15: pre-doseCycle 3 Day 1: pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: pre-doseCycle 7 Day 1: pre-doseCycle 10 Day 1: pre-dose
Amcenestrant + Palbociclib2890.0399.5387.52729.3361.3303.4349.3337.5310.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Liver Function Abnormalities of Grade 3 and 4 During the Treatment Period

Liver Function parameters assessed were aspartate aminotransferase increased, alanine aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, total bilirubin increased, gamma-glutamyl transferase increased. Parameters were assessed as per the NCI-CTCAE v 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. Treatment period was defined as the time from the first dose of study treatments up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment. Participants with Grade 3 and 4 liver function abnormalities were reported in this outcome measure. (NCT04478266)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: 112 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Aspartate aminotransferase increased: Grade 3Aspartate aminotransferase increased: Grade 4Alanine aminotransferase increased: Grade 3Alanine aminotransferase increased: Grade 4Alkaline phosphatase increased: Grade 3Alkaline phosphatase increased: Grade 4Total bilirubin increased: Grade 3Total bilirubin increased: Grade 4Gamma-GT increased: Grade 3Gamma-GT increased: Grade 4
Amcenestrant + Palbociclib2313231050201
Letrozole + Palbociclib90121303090

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities During the Treatment Period

Hematological parameters assessed were anemia, lymphocyte count decreased, neutrophil count decreased, white blood cell decreased, platelet count decreased. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 5.0 (NCI-CTCAE v 5.0), where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. Treatment period was defined as the time from the first dose of study treatments up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment. (NCT04478266)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: 112 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Anemia: Grade 1Anemia: Grade 2Anemia: Grade 3Anemia: Grade 4Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 1Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 2Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 3Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 4Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 1Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 2Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 3Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 4White blood cell decreased: Grade 1White blood cell decreased: Grade 2White blood cell decreased: Grade 3White blood cell decreased: Grade 4Platelet count decreased: Grade 1Platelet count decreased: Grade 2Platelet count decreased: Grade 3Platelet count decreased: Grade 4
Amcenestrant + Palbociclib302781701011244822452171992114626795322012810
Letrozole + Palbociclib309108220981384623221502777081279163728530188

[back to top]

Time to First Chemotherapy

Time to chemotherapy was defined as the time interval (in months) from the date of randomization to the start date of the first chemotherapy after disease progression. (NCT04478266)
Timeframe: From randomization to the start date of the first chemotherapy (maximum duration: 81 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Letrozole + PalbociclibNA
Amcenestrant + PalbociclibNA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) Domain Scores

EORTC-QLQ-C30: cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy & assessment of participant reported outcome. These include 5 functional scales, 9 symptom scales, & Global Health Status/quality of life scale (GHS/QoL). All 14 items/domains were scored on scale of 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) & GHS/QoL, scored on scale of 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). All scales are transformed from raw scores to linear scales ranging 0 to 100. Higher score for functional & GHS/QoL=higher level of functioning, & higher score for symptoms scales=higher symptom burden. Least Square (LS) mean and Standard Error (SE) were derived from MMRM model with change from Baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from Baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., each cycle [Cycle 1 up to Cycle 21]) for each domain was reported in this outcome measure. (NCT04478266)
Timeframe: Baseline, overall treatment duration (Cycle 1 up to Cycle 21 [i.e., 81 weeks])

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
GHS/QoLPhysical functioningRole functioningEmotional functioningCognitive functioningSocial functioningFatigueNausea and vomitingPainDyspneaInsomniaAppetite lossConstipationDiarrheaFinancial difficulties
Amcenestrant + Palbociclib3.12.62.04.1-1.24.4-2.0-0.6-6.8-0.7-3.9-2.70.00.4-4.0
Letrozole + Palbociclib2.82.31.84.2-0.82.2-1.6-1.3-5.8-1.1-2.9-3.00.1-0.4-5.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Breast Cancer Specific Module (EORTC QLQ-BR45) Domain Scores

EORTC QLQ-BR45: comprised of all 23 items from the QLQ-BR23 plus an additional 22 items assessing endocrine therapy symptoms (10 items), endocrine sexual symptoms (4 items), breast satisfaction (2 items), and skin mucosis symptoms (6 items). All items scored 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Scores of all scales transformed from raw scores to linear scales ranging 0 to 100. Higher score for functional scales = better outcome; higher score for symptoms scales = higher symptom burden. LS mean and SE are derived from Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model with change from Baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from Baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., each cycle [Cycle 1 up to Cycle 21]) for each domain (endocrine therapy symptoms, endocrine sexual symptoms, breast satisfaction and skin mucosis symptoms) was reported. (NCT04478266)
Timeframe: Baseline, overall treatment duration (Cycle 1 up to Cycle 21 [i.e., 81 weeks])

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Breast SatisfactionEndocrine Sexual SymptomsEndocrine Therapy SymptomsSkin Mucosis Symptoms
Amcenestrant + Palbociclib1.02.31.22.5
Letrozole + Palbociclib-1.74.81.53.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health Utility Index Value Score

EQ-5D-5L: consists of 2 sections: EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) & VAS. The EQ-5D descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort & anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, & extreme problems. Response options are measured with 5-point Likert scale (for 5L version). The EQ-5D-5L responses are converted into single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates better health state & lower score indicate worse health state. LS mean and SE were derived from MMRM model with change from Baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from Baseline values overall treatment (i.e., each cycle [Cycle 1 up to Cycle 21]) for health utility index value score was reported in this outcome measure. (NCT04478266)
Timeframe: Baseline, overall treatment duration (Cycle 1 up to Cycle 21 [i.e., 81 weeks])

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Letrozole + Palbociclib0.0
Amcenestrant + Palbociclib0.0

[back to top]