Page last updated: 2024-12-04

albuterol

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Albuterol: A short-acting beta-2 adrenergic agonist that is primarily used as a bronchodilator agent to treat ASTHMA. Albuterol is prepared as a racemic mixture of R(-) and S(+) stereoisomers. The stereospecific preparation of R(-) isomer of albuterol is referred to as levalbuterol. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

albuterol : A member of the class of phenylethanolamines that is 4-(2-amino-1-hydroxyethyl)-2-(hydroxymethyl)phenol having a tert-butyl group attached to the nirogen atom. It acts as a beta-adrenergic agonist used in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID2083
CHEMBL ID714
CHEBI ID2549
SCHEMBL ID4913
SCHEMBL ID10025126
MeSH IDM0000631

Synonyms (304)

Synonym
AB00052154-09
BRD-A88254928-001-04-6
gtpl558
DIVK1C_000943
KBIO1_000943
volmax
sultanol
salbutamol sulfate
ventolin
ventoline
ah-3365
4-{2-[(1,1-dimethylethyl)amino]-1-hydroxyethyl}-2-(hydroxymethyl)phenol
dl-albuterol
salbutol
sultanol n
asmatol
asmol
grafalin
ah 3365
salbetol
1,3-benzenedimethanol, alpha1-(((1,1-dimethylethyl)amino)methyl)-4-hydroxy-
salomol
asmasal
salbuven
2-(tert-butylamino)-1-(4-hydroxy-3-hydroxymethylphenyl)ethanol
salbulin
ventilan
cobutolin
bumol
ventolin inhaler
salbuhexal
albuterol [usan]
m-xylene-alpha,alpha'-diol, alpha'-((tert-butylamino)methyl)-4-hydroxy-
dilatamol
hsdb 7206
aerolin
broncovaleas
ventiloboi
farcolin
salamol
tobybron
libretin
salbu-fatol
mozal
asmol uni-dose
asmaven
asmidon
buto-asma
saventol
pneumolat
parasma
alti-salbutamol
sallbupp
buventol
einecs 242-424-0
medolin
salbusian
salmaplon
salbutan
spreor
proventil hfa
asmanil
salbron
4-hydroxy-3-hydroxymethyl-alpha-((tert-butylamino)methyl)benzyl alcohol
sabutal
salbupur
brn 2213614
dl-salbutamol
almotex
novosalmol
theosal
alpha(sup 1)-((tert-butylamino)methyl)-4-hydroxy-m-xylene-alpha,alpha'-diol
salbutamolum [inn-latin]
butamol
zaperin
asmadil
gerivent
servitamol
suprasma
dl-n-tert-butyl-2-(4-hydroxy-3-hydroxymethylphenyl)-2-hydroxyethylamine
volare easi-breathe
vencronyl
respax
salbuvent
2-t-butylamino-1-(4-hydroxy-3-hydroxy-3-hydroxymethyl)phenylethanol
butohaler
asthalin
proventil inhaler
respolin
butovent
suxar
salbutalan
arubendol-salbutamol
bronter
volare albuterol hfa
broncho-spray
m-xylene-alpha,alpha'-diol, alpha-((tert-butylamino)methyl)-4-hydroxy-
ventamol
butotal
1-(tert-butylaminomethyl)-4-hydroxy-m-xylene-alpha1,alpha3-diol
alpha'-((tert-butylamino)methyl)-4-hydroxy-m-xylene-alpha,alpha'-diol
anebron
salvent
bugonol
salbu-basf
ventodisks
1,3-benzenedimethanol, alpha(sup 1)-(((1,1-dimethylethyl)amino)methyl)-4-hydroxy-
SGCUT00011
EU-0101090
SPECTRUM_000200
SPECTRUM5_001059
PRESTWICK_665
BIO1_000935
BIO1_000446
BIO1_001424
CHEBI:2549 ,
4-[2-(tert-butylamino)-1-hydroxyethyl]-2-(hydroxymethyl)phenol
proventil
LOPAC0_001090
BSPBIO_000155
PRESTWICK3_000198
PDSP1_000623
PDSP2_000620
SMP1_000268
IDI1_000943
LOPAC0_001098
BPBIO1_000171
PRESTWICK2_000198
BCBCMAP01_000116
bdbm25769
salbutamol,(+/-)
.alpha.1'-[[(1,1-dimethylethyl)amino]methyl]-4-hydroxy-1,3-benzenedimethanol, hemisulfate
18559-94-9
salbutamol
4-[2-(tert-butylamino)-1-hydroxy-ethyl]-2-(hydroxymethyl)phenol
albuterol
AB00052154
TO_000081
DB01001
D02147
proventil (tn)
albuterol (usp)
NCGC00024698-07
NCGC00024698-04
NCGC00024698-03
KBIO2_005816
KBIOGR_001294
KBIO2_003248
KBIOSS_000680
KBIO2_000680
SPECTRUM2_001350
SPBIO_001539
PRESTWICK1_000198
NINDS_000943
PRESTWICK0_000198
SPECTRUM4_000887
SPBIO_002076
SPECTRUM1500677
NCGC00024698-02
NCGC00024698-05
NCGC00024698-06
NCGC00015955-04
AC-10286
HMS2089I19
S 8260 ,
HMS2092I08
NCGC00015955-11
NCGC00015955-10
sch 13949w
etinoline
salbutamolum
nsc-757417
sch-13949w
CHEMBL714
ksc-11-222-1
KUC106739N
VU0243312-5
L000531
HMS502P05
HMS1568H17
HMS1921C04
NCGC00015955-09
HMS2095H17
AKOS007930174
salbutamol [inn:ban]
nsc 757417
qf8svz843e ,
albuterol [usan:usp]
unii-qf8svz843e
airomir
eolene
ec 242-424-0
4-{2-[(tert-butyl)amino]-1-hydroxyethyl}-2-(hydroxymethyl)phenol
tox21_200800
NCGC00258354-01
4-[2-(tert-butylamino)-1-oxidanyl-ethyl]-2-(hydroxymethyl)phenol
A812971
nsc757417
pharmakon1600-01500677
dtxcid001255
tox21_110266
dtxsid5021255 ,
CCG-39288
NCGC00015955-07
NCGC00015955-12
NCGC00015955-13
NCGC00015955-05
NCGC00015955-14
NCGC00015955-06
NCGC00015955-08
ventalin inhaler
solbutamol
alpha-[(tert-butylamino)methyl]-4-hydroxy-m-xylene-alpha,alpha'-diol
S5494
albuterol [mi]
albuterol [hsdb]
albuterol [orange book]
salbutamol [ep impurity]
35763-26-9
salbutamol [who-dd]
salbutamolum [who-ip latin]
salbutamol [ep monograph]
albuterol [usp monograph]
salbutamol [inn]
albuterol [usp-rs]
salbutamol [mart.]
albuterol [vandf]
salbutamol [who-ip]
1,3-benzenedimethanol, .alpha.(sup 1)-(((1,1-dimethylethyl)amino)methyl)-4-hydroxy-
(+/-)-1,3-benzenedimethanol, .alpha.(sup 1)-(((1,1-dimethylethyl)amino)methyl)-4-hydroxy-
SCHEMBL4913
NCGC00015955-16
tox21_110266_1
KS-5209
AB00052154-08
CS-4556
racemic salbutamol
4-(2-(tert-butylamino)-1-hydroxyethyl)-2-(hydroxymethyl)phenol
SCHEMBL10025126
Q-201696
Q-201695
.alpha.'-((tert-butylamino)methyl)-4-hydroxy-m-xylene-.alpha.,.alpha.'-diol
1,3-benzenedimethanol, .alpha.1-[[(1,1-dimethylethyl)amino]methyl]-4-hydroxy-
salamol eb
4-[2-(tert-butylamino)-1-hydroxyethyl]-2-(hydroxymethyl)phenol #
m-xylene-.alpha.,.alpha.-diol, .alpha.-1-((tert-butylamino)methyl)-4-hydroxy-
4-hydroxy-3-hydroxymethyl-.alpha.-((tert-butylamino)methyl)benzyl alcohol
m-xylene-.alpha.,.alpha.'-diol, .alpha.'-((tert-butylamino)methyl)-4-hydroxy-
1-(tert-butylaminomethyl)-4-hydroxy-m-xylene-.alpha.1,.alpha.3-diol
venetlin (salt/mix)
.alpha.1-[(tert-butylamino)methyl]-4-hydroxy-m-xylene-.alpha.,.alpha.'-diol
1,3-benzenedimethanol, .alpha.(1)-[[(1,1-dimethylethyl)amino]methyl]-4-hydroxy-
albuterol (+/-)
HY-B1037
AB00052154_10
AB00052154_11
mfcd00148978
1219798-60-3
salbutamol, vetranal(tm), analytical standard
albuterol, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
salbutamol free base
salbutamol, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
salbutamol 100 microg/ml in acetonitrile
SR-01000075161-3
SR-01000075161-8
SR-01000075161-4
sr-01000075161
SR-01000075161-11
SR-01000075161-5
SBI-0051060.P005
HMS3712H17
2-(tert-butylamino)-1-[4-hydroxy-3-(hydroxymethyl)phenyl]ethanol
salbutamol, british pharmacopoeia (bp) reference standard
FT-0770967
FT-0661467
Q410358
salbutamol-(tert-butyl-d9) acetate
148563-15-9
BCP28423
BRD-A88254928-001-05-3
SB19749
SDCCGSBI-0051060.P006
NCGC00015955-28
HMS3886I08
AMY38245
(+)-5,6-o-cyclohexylidene-l-ascorbicacid
F15026
alpha-[(tert-butylamino)methyl]-4-hydroxy-m-xylene-alpha,alpha1-diol
BA164143
EN300-365894
(+/-)-albuterol-d3
salbutamol (ep monograph)
alpha1-
salbutamol (mart.)
4-hydroxy-3-hydroxymethyl-alpha-
salbutamolum (inn-latin)
salbutamol (ep impurity)
albuterol (usp-rs)
albuterol (usp monograph)
albuterol (usan:usp)
salbutamolo
Z2301287926
d,l-salbutamol, 1mg/ml in ethanol
d,l-salbutamol

Research Excerpts

Overview

Levalbuterol is a cost-saving option for treating hospitalized patients with COPD in China. LevalbuterOL is an alternative to racemic al buterol with potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce costs in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Levalbuterol is a cost-saving option for treating hospitalized patients with COPD in China."( Levalbuterol
Chen, L; Chen, X; Hu, Y; Li, X; Zhi, C,
)
1.37
"Levalbuterol is a single isomer beta2-agonist that differs from racemic albuterol by elimination of (S)-albuterol. "( Levalbuterol: pharmacologic properties and use in the treatment of pediatric and adult asthma.
Berger, WE, 2003
)
1.56
"Albuterol is an effective treatment for hyperkalemia through beta-adrenergic induction of potassium (K+) uptake. "( Levalbuterol is as effective as racemic albuterol in lowering serum potassium.
Evans, E; LaFlamme, M; Pancu, D; Reed, J, 2003
)
2.38
"Albuterol is a beta 2-agonist with rapid onset of action and a duration of approximately 6 hours."( Formoterol vs. albuterol administered via Turbuhaler system in the emergency treatment of acute asthma in children.
Avila-Castañón, L; Casas-Becerra, B; Del Río-Navarro, BE; Sienra-Monge, JJ; Velázquez-Armenta, Y,
)
1.21
"Albuterol is a selective beta2-agonist that is widely used in the prevention and treatment of reactive airway disease. "( The cost effectiveness of levalbuterol versus racemic albuterol.
Quinn, C, 2004
)
2.06
"Levalbuterol is an alternative to racemic albuterol with the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce costs in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations."( Asthma pathophysiology and evidence-based treatment of severe exacerbations.
Schreck, DM, 2006
)
0.96
"Albuterol is a beta-2 agonist that has been demonstrated to increase muscle strength in studies in animals and humans. "( Albuterol increases lean body mass in ambulatory boys with Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy.
Fowler, EG; Graves, M; Skura, CL; Spencer, MJ; Wetzel, GT, 2008
)
3.23
"Albuterol is a long-acting beta 2-adrenergic receptor-selective drug that relaxes airway smooth muscle. "( Albuterol: an adrenergic agent for use in the treatment of asthma pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and clinical use.
Ahrens, RC; Smith, GD,
)
3.02
"Albuterol is a beta2-adrenergic agonist commonly used as a bronchodilator for the treatment of patients with asthma. "( Determination of albuterol in plasma after aerosol inhalation by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with selected-ion monitoring.
Anderson, P; Breen, P; Compadre, CM; Gann, L; Hiller, C; Logsdon, TW; Zhou, X, 1997
)
2.08
"Albuterol is a quickly acting beta-2 adrenergic agonist bronchodilator widely used by asthmatics. "( Cardiovascular effects after inhalation of large doses of albuterol dry powder in rats, monkeys, and dogs: a species comparison.
Banks, CM; Beattie, JG; Lulham, GW; Mirro, EJ; Pai, S; Petruska, JM; Stuart, BO; Walters, KM, 1997
)
1.98
"Albuterol is a safe drug for the treatment of mild to moderate asthma exacerbations in pediatric patients."( Metabolic and electrocardiographic effects of albuterol in pediatric asthmatic patients treated in an emergency room setting.
Del Río-Navarro, B; Gazca-Aguilar, A; Quibrera Matienzo, JA; Rodríguez Galván, Y; Sienra-Monge, JJ,
)
1.11
"Albuterol is a 50:50 mixture of R-albuterol, the active enantiomer, and S-albuterol, which appears to be inactive in humans. "( Levalbuterol nebulizer solution: is it worth five times the cost of albuterol?
Asmus, MJ; Hendeles, L, 2000
)
2.37
"Albuterol is a specific beta-2 agonist that has been reported to be effective in treating infants and children with bronchospastic pulmonary disease. "( A randomized placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effects of oral albuterol on pulmonary mechanics in ventilator-dependent infants at risk of developing BPD.
Bhutani, VK; Fox, WW; Stefano, JL, 1991
)
1.96

Effects

The albuterol mDPI has an efficacy/tolerability profile consistent with other inhaled forms of al buterol. The drug is reliable, easy to use, and associated with a high level of patient satisfaction.

The albuterol mDPI has an efficacy/tolerability profile consistent with other inhaled forms of al buterol, and is reliable, easy to use, and associated with a high level of patient satisfaction. AlbuterOL has been reformulated in the non-ozone-depleting propellant, hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA al Buterol)

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The albuterol mDPI has an efficacy/tolerability profile consistent with other inhaled forms of albuterol, and is reliable, easy to use, and associated with a high level of patient satisfaction. "( Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical efficacy of albuterol RespiClick(™) dry-powder inhaler in the treatment of asthma.
Welch, MJ, 2016
)
1.23
"HFA albuterol has a safety profile similar to that of CFC albuterol during chronic, scheduled use, and both drugs are well tolerated. "( Safety of long-term treatment with HFA albuterol.
Colice, GL; Ekholm, BP; Klinger, NM; Ramsdell, JW, 1999
)
1.13
"Oral albuterol has worse efficacy and side effects compared with inhaled albuterol, and thus its use has been discouraged for decades. "( Association between dispensing of low-value oral albuterol and removal from Medicaid preferred drug lists.
Chua, KP; Ciaccio, C; Conti, R; Pelczar, A; Volerman, A, 2022
)
1.49
"Albuterol has been a cornerstone of asthma treatment for several decades, but evidence suggests that it may be overused at the expense of more efficacious treatment. "( Albuterol: Still first-line in rescue therapy?
Pitonzo, DG, 2022
)
3.61
"The albuterol mDPI has an efficacy/tolerability profile consistent with other inhaled forms of albuterol, and is reliable, easy to use, and associated with a high level of patient satisfaction. "( Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical efficacy of albuterol RespiClick(™) dry-powder inhaler in the treatment of asthma.
Welch, MJ, 2016
)
1.23
"Albuterol has been used for more than 40 years to treat acute asthma exacerbations as a racemic mixture of isomers: the active form, (R)-albuterol, or levalbuterol, and (S)-albuterol, classically considered inert. "( Levalbuterol versus albuterol.
Ameredes, BT; Calhoun, WJ, 2009
)
2.42
"Albuterol has been used in the acute treatment of asthma exacerbations for over 25 years. "( Albuterol enantiomers: pre-clinical and clinical value?
Ameredes, BT; Calhoun, WJ, 2010
)
3.25
"Albuterol has been proven to be a vital component in the management of severe, acute asthma in children and adults. "( Administration of albuterol by continuous nebulization.
Buck, ML, 1995
)
2.07
"albuterol, Airomir, 3M) has been approved for marketing in over 35 countries."( The change to non-CFC metered dose inhalers.
Rubinfeld, A, 1997
)
1.02
"Albuterol has been reformulated in the non-ozone-depleting propellant, hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA albuterol)."( Safety of long-term treatment with HFA albuterol.
Colice, GL; Ekholm, BP; Klinger, NM; Ramsdell, JW, 1999
)
1.29
"HFA albuterol has a safety profile similar to that of CFC albuterol during chronic, scheduled use, and both drugs are well tolerated. "( Safety of long-term treatment with HFA albuterol.
Colice, GL; Ekholm, BP; Klinger, NM; Ramsdell, JW, 1999
)
1.13
"(S)-albuterol has distinctive pharmacologic properties that are unrelated to activation of beta(2 )-adrenoceptors."( Contrasting properties of albuterol stereoisomers.
Morley, J; Page, CP, 1999
)
1.08
"R-albuterol has greater bronchodilatory effects than the racemate and may have anti-inflammatory properties."( Levalbuterol hydrochloride.
Colin, AA; Slattery, D; Wong, SW, 2002
)
1.49

Actions

Albuterol reduces lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure in normal volunteers, although the effects of al buterol on esphageal function in asthmatic patients are not known. The drug can also cause hypokalemia and other metabolic and electrical changes, including prolonged QT interval.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Albuterol can also cause hypokalemia and other metabolic and electrical changes, including prolonged QT interval."( Acute myocardial infarction associated with albuterol.
Davis, MW; Fisher, AA; McGill, DA, 2004
)
1.31
"Albuterol reduces lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure in normal volunteers, although the effects of albuterol on esophageal function in asthmatic patients are not known. "( The effects of nebulized albuterol on esophageal function in asthmatic patients.
DesBiens, J; Lacy, BE; Liu, MC; Mathis, C, 2008
)
2.09
"Albuterol can also produce undesirable dose-related effects: metabolic effects including decreased levels of plasma potassium, phosphate, calcium and magnesium; increased levels of plasma glucose, insulin, renin, lactate and ketones; peripheral vasodilation and perhaps some direct cardiac stimulation resulting in decreased systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance, increased pulse pressure and tachycardia; and skeletal muscle tremor."( Albuterol: an adrenergic agent for use in the treatment of asthma pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and clinical use.
Ahrens, RC; Smith, GD,
)
2.3
"Albuterol at a lower dose (0.1 mg/kg) had no significant effect on erythrocyte mass."( beta 2-Adrenergic stimulation of erythropoiesis in busulfan treated mice.
Bauer, C; Jelkmann, W, 1980
)
0.98
"(S)-albuterol does not activate beta(2 )-adrenoceptors and does not modify activation of beta(2 )-adrenoceptors by (R)-albuterol so that for many years it was presumed to be biologically inert."( Contrasting properties of albuterol stereoisomers.
Morley, J; Page, CP, 1999
)
1.08
"Albuterol did not produce any significant changes in blood pressure and pulse rate, thus confirming its selectivity for beta2 receptors."( Comparative study of acute effects of albuterol and isoproterenol sulphate aerosols in bronchial asthma.
Huber, GL; Mahajan, VK; Tomashefski, JF, 1977
)
1.25
"With albuterol mean percent increase in FEV1 fell to 15% over baseline at 5 hr after a dose."( Bitolterol and albuterol metered-dose aerosols: comparison of two long-acting beta 2-adrenergic bronchodilators for treatment of asthma.
Kemp, JP; Orgel, HA; Tinkelman, DG; Webb, DR, 1985
)
1.08

Treatment

Levalbuterol treatment in the ED for patients with acute asthma resulted in higher patient discharge rates and may be a cost-effective alternative to racemic al buterol. The albuters demonstrated reduced parkinsonian symptoms and an increased ability to tap their index finger between two points 20 cm apart.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Albuterol treatment caused a small but significant increase in FEV(1) and FVC, a significant decrease of Vcw at FRC (VcwFRC), but no changes of Vcw at TLC (VcwTLC) and breathing pattern variables. "( Inspiratory capacity and decrease in lung hyperinflation with albuterol in COPD.
Bianchi, R; Brusasco, V; Duranti, R; Filippelli, M; Pellegrino, R; Romagnoli, I; Scano, G, 2002
)
2
"Levalbuterol-treated patients required significantly fewer treatments with beta-agonists (mean [+/- SD] number of treatments, 19.0 +/- 12.7 vs 30.8 +/- 24.0; p < 0.001) and ipratropium bromide (mean number of treatments, 9.4 +/- 11.5 vs 23.2 +/- 25.1; p < 0.001) than did racemic albuterol-treated patients."( Levalbuterol compared to racemic albuterol: efficacy and outcomes in patients hospitalized with COPD or asthma.
Halpern, M; Truitt, T; Witko, J, 2003
)
1.45
"Levalbuterol treatment in the ED for patients with acute asthma resulted in higher patient discharge rates and may be a cost-effective alternative to racemic albuterol."( Comparison of racemic albuterol and levalbuterol in the treatment of acute asthma in the ED.
Babin, S; Schreck, DM, 2005
)
1.26
"The albuterol-treated patients demonstrated reduced parkinsonian symptoms and an increased ability to tap their index finger between two points 20 cm apart, and were able to perform a "walk test" in 70% of their control time."( Beta 2-adrenergic agonist as adjunct therapy to levodopa in Parkinson's disease.
Alexander, GM; Grothusen, JR; Hooker, MD; Nukes, TA; Schwartzman, RJ, 1994
)
0.77
"Albuterol treatment significantly increased the LAR compared to placebo treatment (p = 0.003) and significantly enhanced the number of sputum eosinophils (p = 0.009) and sputum ECP (p = 0.04) at 7 h but not 24 h post-allergen (p > 0.05)."( Effect of regular inhaled albuterol on allergen-induced late responses and sputum eosinophils in asthmatic subjects.
Cockroft, DW; Gauvreau, GM; Jordana, M; O'Byrne, PM; Watson, RM, 1997
)
1.32
"Albuterol treatment significantly reduced the median thickness of subepithelial Tn expression from 9.7 to 6.3 microns (P = 0.023) and macrophage numbers in the epithelium (P = 0.034), lamina propria (P = 0.039) and entire mucosa (P = 0.033), whereas nedocromil sodium had no effect."( Regular albuterol or nedocromil sodium--effects on airway subepithelial tenascin in asthma.
Altraja, A; Laitinen, A; Laitinen, LA; Marran, S; Märtson, T; Meriste, S; Sillastu, H, 1999
)
1.46
"Albuterol pretreatment resulted in modest but significant bronchodilation as compared to placebo."( Inhaled albuterol does not protect against ozone toxicity in nonasthmatic athletes.
Bedi, JF; Gong, H; Horvath, SM,
)
1.29
"Albuterol treatment produced significant bronchodilation and also prevented SO2-induced bronchoconstriction."( The effects of albuterol on sulfur dioxide-induced bronchoconstriction in allergic adolescents.
Bierman, CW; Furukawa, CT; Horike, M; Koenig, JQ; Marshall, SG; Pierson, WE; Shapiro, GG, 1987
)
1.35
"Albuterol/theophylline treatment produced peak expiratory flow rates 2 hours after administration that were significantly higher than in the theophylline/placebo-treated group (119.3 L/min versus 83 L/min) p less than 0.01."( Albuterol syrup in the treatment of asthma.
Bierman, CW; Furukawa, CT; Pierson, WE; Shapiro, GG, 1985
)
2.43
"Treatment with albuterol (8 mg/kg/day) during the two-week anti-MuSK injection series reduced the degree of weakness and weight loss, compared to vehicle-treated mice."( Effects of the ß2-adrenoceptor agonist, albuterol, in a mouse model of anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis.
Ghazanfari, N; Morsch, M; Phillips, WD; Reddel, SW; Tse, N, 2014
)
1.01
"Treatment with albuterol resulted in progressive improvement of muscle strength, exercise tolerance, and ophthalmoplegia."( Neuromuscular junction acetylcholinesterase deficiency responsive to albuterol.
Chan, SH; Engel, AG; Wong, VC, 2012
)
0.95
"Pretreatment with albuterol is more effective than montelukast for prevention of exercise-induced bronchospasm in children with asthma."( Pretreatment with albuterol versus montelukast for exercise-induced bronchospasm in children.
Harkins, M; Kelly, F; Kelly, HW; Raissy, HH, 2008
)
1.01
"Treatment with albuterol decreased markedly both LTC4 secretion to 144 +/- 54.0 pg/ml (P < .05 vs."( Beta adrenergic modulation of formyl-methionine-leucine-phenylalanine-stimulated secretion of eosinophil peroxidase and leukotriene C4.
Leff, AR; McAllister, K; Munoz, NM; Neeley, SP; Spaethe, SM; Vita, AJ; White, SR, 1994
)
0.63
"Pretreatment with albuterol, cromolyn, and a combination of albuterol and cromolyn 30 minutes before ETS exposure significantly diminished airway reactivity to ETS."( Asthmatic responses to passive cigarette smoke: persistence of reactivity and effect of medications.
Lehrer, SB; Menon, PK; Rando, RJ; Salvaggio, JE; Stankus, RP, 1991
)
0.6
"Pretreatment with albuterol (1 microgram/kg) or aminophylline significantly attenuated the pulmonary response to methacholine in the mongrels but was without effect in the BGs."( Reduced sensitivity to beta-adrenergic agonists in Basenji-Greyhound dogs.
Hirshman, CA; Sauder, RA; Tobias, JD, 1990
)
0.6
"Pretreatment with albuterol abolished any significant bronchoconstriction, with mean maximal falls in SGaw and FEV1 after challenge of 7.5 and 1.4%, respectively."( Influence of albuterol, cromolyn sodium and ipratropium bromide on the airway and circulating mediator responses to allergen bronchial provocation in asthma.
Church, MK; Durham, SR; Holgate, ST; Howarth, PH; Kay, AB; Lee, TH, 1985
)
0.96
"Pretreatment with albuterol attenuated both the cough and the drop in FEV1."( Cough and wheezing from beclomethasone aerosol.
Shim, C; Williams, MH, 1987
)
0.6

Toxicity

Two very large, randomized, double-blind clinical trials performed in the United Kingdom and in the U.S. have suggested that addition of salmeteräE to usual asthma therapy is associated with a significant increase in the incidence of serious adverse events and asthma-related deaths.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Tremor was found to be the dose-limiting side effect with both modes of administration."( Bronchodilating effect and side effects of beta2- adrenoceptor stimulants by different modes of administration (tablets, metered aerosol, and combinations thereof). A study with salbutamol in asthmatics.
Larsson, S; Svedmyr, N, 1977
)
0.26
" Safety was determined by monitoring adverse events and standard biochemical, haematological and cardiovascular parameters."( Inhaled salmeterol in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe reversible obstructive airways disease--a 3-month comparison of the efficacy and safety of twice-daily salmeterol (100 micrograms) with salmeterol (50 micrograms).
Palmer, JB; Shepherd, GL; Stuart, AM; Viskum, K, 1992
)
0.28
" Although the number of subjects studied is small, our data suggest that air-driven nebulised high-dose salbutamol may be safe in the treatment of severe chronic obstructive airway disease but when combined with oral theophylline, a significant fall in plasma potassium may occur."( Air-driven nebulised high-dose salbutamol in severe chronic obstructive airways disease: is it safe?
Friend, JA; Lai, CK; Legge, JS, 1991
)
0.28
" The study which is the first report in Africa to assess this novel formulation of salbutamol in a group of African patients, demonstrates that controlled release salbutamol 8 mg administered twice daily is safe and effective, offering benefits over current therapies in the treatment of asthma."( The efficacy and safety of a controlled release formulation of salbutamol in the management of patients with asthma in Nairobi, Kenya.
Aluoch, JA; Gathua, SN, 1990
)
0.28
" The purpose of the present study was to assess the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and adverse effects of standard salbutamol tablets given by this route to patients with asthma."( Pharmacokinetics, efficacy and adverse effects of sublingual salbutamol in patients with asthma.
Clark, GA; Clark, RA; Dhillon, DP; Lipworth, BJ; McDevitt, DG; Moreland, TA; Struthers, AD, 1989
)
0.28
" Although it is safe to use oxygen as the driving gas for nebulisers in patients with obstructive airways disease with normal Pco2, caution should be exercised in those who already have carbon dioxide retention."( Oxygen as a driving gas for nebulisers: safe or dangerous?
Campbell, IA; Gunawardena, KA; MacDonald, JB; Patel, B; Smith, AP, 1984
)
0.27
"The incidence of potentially drug-related adverse events was similar among the treatment groups (range: 22% to 23%), with headache being the most commonly reported (range: 9% to 10%)."( Safety of salmeterol in the maintenance treatment of asthma.
Alexander, WJ; Chervinsky, P; Kemp, JP; Liddle, R; Mills, R; Nathan, RA; Seltzer, JM, 1995
)
0.29
" Extensive cardiovascular monitoring revealed no significant cardiovascular adverse effects or arrhythmogenic effects associated with salmeterol over 12 weeks."( Safety of salmeterol in the maintenance treatment of asthma.
Alexander, WJ; Chervinsky, P; Kemp, JP; Liddle, R; Mills, R; Nathan, RA; Seltzer, JM, 1995
)
0.29
" Cough, headache and itchy throat were adverse events possibly related to the use of Salmeterol."( Efficacy and safety of inhaled Salmeterol (Serevent) as maintenance therapy for asthma in Nairobi.
Gikonyo, BM; Nganga, LW; Odhiambo, JA, 1994
)
0.29
" The outcome variables were: duration of hospitalization, percent of predicted peak expiratory flow rates recorded at 12-hour intervals, number of albuterol treatments required, and adverse effects."( Aminophylline therapy does not improve outcome and increases adverse effects in children hospitalized with acute asthmatic exacerbations.
Bonagura, VR; Strauss, RE; Valacer, DJ; Wertheim, DL, 1994
)
0.49
" In the Am group, 6 of the 14 patients who entered the study experienced significant adverse effects consisting of nausea, emesis, headache, abdominal pain, and palpitations."( Aminophylline therapy does not improve outcome and increases adverse effects in children hospitalized with acute asthmatic exacerbations.
Bonagura, VR; Strauss, RE; Valacer, DJ; Wertheim, DL, 1994
)
0.29
"There is no benefit and considerable risk of adverse effects associated with the use of Am in hospitalized asthmatic children."( Aminophylline therapy does not improve outcome and increases adverse effects in children hospitalized with acute asthmatic exacerbations.
Bonagura, VR; Strauss, RE; Valacer, DJ; Wertheim, DL, 1994
)
0.29
" These aerosolized medications are not without the potential for adverse effects."( Unexpected adverse effects of Freon 11 and Freon 12 as medication propellants.
Oenbrink, RJ, 1993
)
0.29
"Continuous albuterol therapy appears to be safe in our patient population as there was no significant evidence of cardiotoxicity."( Safety of continuous nebulized albuterol for bronchospasm in infants and children.
Crowley, MR; Grad, R; Katz, RW; Kelly, HW; McWilliams, BC; Murphy, SJ, 1993
)
0.96
" In addition, all adverse effects were noted."( The efficacy and safety of a continuous albuterol protocol for the treatment of acute adult asthma attacks.
Barish, RA; Brandt, G; Hooper, F; Jerrard, D; Olshaker, J, 1993
)
0.55
" This study shows that acute inhalation of HFA-134a in a CFC-free system is as safe as a CFC propellant system."( Acute safety of the CFC-free propellant HFA-134a from a pressurized metered dose inhaler.
Cooper, KM; Donnell, D; Ekholm, BP; Harrison, LI; Klinger, NM; McEwen, J; Porietis, I; Ward, S, 1995
)
0.29
" The only notable adverse experiences in the azelastine group were alterations in taste perception and a small mean increase in body weight."( An evaluation of the efficacy and safety of azelastine in patients with chronic asthma. Azelastine-Asthma Study Group.
, 1996
)
0.29
" Salmeterol was well tolerated as assessed by pulse, blood pressure, haematological and biochemical variables and number of adverse events."( The efficacy and safety of inhaled salmeterol 50 microg bd in older patients with reversible airflow obstruction.
Luce, P; Starke, ID, 1996
)
0.29
" We feel that CAN is safe for use in children diagnosed with status asthmaticus."( Efficacy and safety of continuous albuterol nebulization in children with severe status asthmaticus.
Bigos, D; Brilli, RJ; Craig, VL, 1996
)
0.57
" This study does not exclude the possibility that adverse cardiac events could occur with severe hypoxemia."( Cardiovascular safety of high doses of inhaled fenoterol and albuterol in acute severe asthma.
Abboud, RT; Bowie, DM; Chapman, KR; Hodder, RV; McCallum, AL; Mesic-Fuchs, H; Molfino, NA; Newhouse, MT; Paré, PD, 1996
)
0.54
" Both studies were continued for a further 9 months during which time exacerbation rates, lung function at the clinic and adverse events were monitored."( Efficacy and safety of salmeterol in childhood asthma.
Boner, AL; Ebbutt, A; Jenkins, MM; Lenney, W; Pedersen, S, 1995
)
0.29
" No serious drug-related adverse events occurred."( Comparative efficacy and safety of twice daily fluticasone propionate powder versus placebo in the treatment of moderate asthma.
Goldstein, MF; Hamedani, AG; Kellerman, DJ; Noonan, MJ; Pearlman, DS; Schaberg, A; Tashkin, DP, 1997
)
0.3
" No adverse events of clinical relevance were reported."( Safety and efficacy of a high cumulative dose of salbutamol inhaled via Turbuhaler or via a pressurized metered-dose inhaler in patients with asthma.
Bondesson, E; Friberg, K; Löfdahl, CG; Soliman, S, 1998
)
0.3
"Proportions of patients who were: admitted to hospital for respiratory diseases, reported adverse side effects, or withdrew because of adverse affects."( Postmarketing surveillance study of a non-chlorofluorocarbon inhaler according to the safety assessment of marketed medicines guidelines.
Ayres, JG; Frost, CD; Holmes, WF; Ward, SM; Williams, DR, 1998
)
0.3
"08) or the proportions who reported adverse events (1."( Postmarketing surveillance study of a non-chlorofluorocarbon inhaler according to the safety assessment of marketed medicines guidelines.
Ayres, JG; Frost, CD; Holmes, WF; Ward, SM; Williams, DR, 1998
)
0.3
"The hydrofluoroalkane inhaler was as safe as the chlorofluorocarbon inhaler when judged by hospital admissions and adverse affects."( Postmarketing surveillance study of a non-chlorofluorocarbon inhaler according to the safety assessment of marketed medicines guidelines.
Ayres, JG; Frost, CD; Holmes, WF; Ward, SM; Williams, DR, 1998
)
0.3
" Adverse events and changes in clinical laboratory values, vital signs, ECG results, and physical examinations were reported with similar incidence in each of the three treatment groups."( Comparative efficacy and safety of albuterol sulfate Spiros inhaler and albuterol metered-dose inhaler in asthma.
Bieler, S; Hill, MR; Kemp, JP; Nelson, H; Vaughan, LM, 1999
)
0.58
"Cardiovascular safety was regularly assessed by 12-lead ECG with a 15-s lead II rhythm strip, 24-h continuous ambulatory ECG (Holter) monitoring, serial vital sign measurements, and review of adverse cardiovascular events."( Long-term cardiovascular safety of salmeterol powder pharmacotherapy in adolescent and adult patients with chronic persistent asthma: a randomized clinical trial.
Arledge, T; Chervinsky, P; Galant, S; Goldberg, P; Stahl, E; Wang, Y; Welch, MB, 1999
)
0.3
"Long-term, twice-daily pharmacotherapy with salmeterol powder is safe and is not associated with unfavorable clinically significant changes in cardiac function or increases in cardiovascular adverse effects."( Long-term cardiovascular safety of salmeterol powder pharmacotherapy in adolescent and adult patients with chronic persistent asthma: a randomized clinical trial.
Arledge, T; Chervinsky, P; Galant, S; Goldberg, P; Stahl, E; Wang, Y; Welch, MB, 1999
)
0.3
" The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar across groups."( Diskus and diskhaler: efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate via two dry powder inhalers in subjects with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.
Brown, A; Finn, A; Galant, SP; Gross, G; Hamedani, AG; Harding, SM; Pleskow, W; van Bavel, J, 1999
)
0.3
"As no cardiac side effects were detected, it could be concluded that salmeterol is quite a safe drug for use in childhood asthma treatment."( Cardiac side effects of long-acting beta-2 agonist salmeterol in asthmatic children.
Demirsoy, S; Olguntürk, R; Tunaoğlu, FS; Türktaş, I, 1999
)
0.3
" Adverse events were recorded at clinic visits."( Safety of long-term treatment with HFA albuterol.
Colice, GL; Ekholm, BP; Klinger, NM; Ramsdell, JW, 1999
)
0.57
" Total reported adverse events were similar for the two treatments."( Safety of long-term treatment with HFA albuterol.
Colice, GL; Ekholm, BP; Klinger, NM; Ramsdell, JW, 1999
)
0.57
" Safety measurements included vital signs, physical examination, and reports of clinical adverse events at baseline and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment."( Efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life of salmeterol in patients with moderate persistent asthma.
Busse, WW; Casale, TB; Cox, F; Murray, JJ; Petrocella, V; Rickard, K, 1998
)
0.3
" Pulmonary function, symptom control, frequency of asthma exacerbations, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to methacholine challenge, and adverse events were assessed."( A six-month, placebo-controlled comparison of the safety and efficacy of salmeterol or beclomethasone for persistent asthma.
Emmett, AH; Grossman, J; Nathan, RA; Pinnas, JL; Rickard, KA; Schwartz, HJ; Yancey, SW, 1999
)
0.3
" We conclude that sputum induction using a relatively low output ultrasonic nebulizer with premedication with salbutamol is successful and safe in the majority of patients with asthma and other airway conditions."( The safety and success rate of sputum induction using a low output ultrasonic nebuliser.
Hunter, CJ; Pavord, ID; Ward, R; Wardlaw, AJ; Woltmann, G, 1999
)
0.3
" Our findings indicate that TAA-HFA is a safe and effective replacement for the currently marketed CFC-containing product."( Placebo-controlled, comparative study of the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide inhalation aerosol with the non-CFC propellant HFA-134a in patients with asthma. Azmacort HFA Clinical Study Group.
Banerji, D; Chervinsky, P; Jacobson, K; Kane, RE; Noonan, M; Uryniak, T, 1999
)
0.3
" Safety assessments included monitoring of adverse events and morning serum cortisol concentrations."( Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/100 microg) in combination in a Diskus inhaler (Seretide) is effective and safe in children with asthma.
Anttila, H; Davies, PI; Hederos, CA; Ossip, MS; Ribeiro, BL; Van den Berg, NJ, 2000
)
0.31
" Frequent adverse events were exacerbations of the underlying airway disease (24%) and infections (12%), while typical pharmacological side-effects like tremor or tachycardia where reported in less than 1% of all patients."( [efficacy and safety of salmeterol in long-term therapy in patients with chronic obstructive airway diseases].
Beeh, KM; Buhl, R; Salem, AE; Wiewrodt, R, 2000
)
0.31
" Fluticasone propionate treatment over a 54-week period was well tolerated, with few drug-related adverse events, which were primarily topical effects of inhaled corticosteroids."( Long-term efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate powder administered once or twice daily via inhaler to patients with moderate asthma.
Adelglass, J; Clifford, DP; Duke, SP; Faris, M; Harding, SM; Wire, PD; ZuWallack, R, 2000
)
0.31
" Maternal side effects, particularly cardiovascular adverse events (8."( Effectiveness and safety of the oxytocin antagonist atosiban versus beta-adrenergic agonists in the treatment of preterm labour. The Worldwide Atosiban versus Beta-agonists Study Group.
, 2001
)
0.31
" The extrapulmonary responses of (R)-albuterol and adverse effects were similar for single R-enantiomer or the racemic mixture."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics and safety of inhaled albuterol enantiomers in healthy volunteers.
DeGraw, S; Gumbhir-Shah, K; Jusko, WJ; Kellerman, DJ; Koch, P, 1998
)
0.8
" In addition, GCD is relatively safe in the rat if the amount of GCD in the formulation is similar to this experiment."( Cyclodextrin as a potential drug carrier in salbutamol dry powder aerosols: the in-vitro deposition and toxicity studies of the complexes.
Reanmongkol, W; Srichana, T; Suedee, R, 2001
)
0.31
" Outcomes assessed were completion of the test protocol, adequacy of sputum samples, decrease in FEV1, and adverse effects during the procedure."( The tolerability, safety, and success of sputum induction and combined hypertonic saline challenge in children.
Gibson, PG; Hankin, R; Henry, RL; Jones, PD; Simpson, J, 2001
)
0.31
"Sputum induction is a safe and effective technique to study airway inflammation in stable asthma."( Safety of sputum induction with isotonic saline in adults with acute severe asthma.
Gibson, PG; Hensley, MJ; Simpson, JL; Wark, PA, 2001
)
0.31
" Adverse events, clinical laboratory test results, vital signs, and electrocardiograms were evaluated for safety."( Low-dose levalbuterol in children with asthma: safety and efficacy in comparison with placebo and racemic albuterol.
Baumgartner, RA; Bensch, G; Claus, R; Kim, KT; Milgrom, H; Skoner, DP, 2001
)
0.69
" Lung function, quality of life and adverse events were evaluated as primary outcome variables."( [Efficacy and safety of salmeterol (50 microgram) and fluticasone (250 microgram) in a single inhaler device (diskus) in patients with mild to moderate asthma].
Beeh, KM; Beier, J; Buhl, R; Kornmann, O; Wiewrodt, R, 2002
)
0.31
" Frequent adverse events included symptoms of asthma (5."( [Efficacy and safety of salmeterol (50 microgram) and fluticasone (250 microgram) in a single inhaler device (diskus) in patients with mild to moderate asthma].
Beeh, KM; Beier, J; Buhl, R; Kornmann, O; Wiewrodt, R, 2002
)
0.31
" The main outcome measures were: indication for use of Ventolin MDI, assessment of disease severity, event rates during each period of observation; deaths, pregnancies, reported adverse drug reactions and reasons for discontinuation of MDI."( Prospective observational cohort safety study to monitor the introduction of a non-CFC formulation of salbutamol with HFA134a in England.
Craig-McFeely, PM; Maier, WC; Shakir, SA; Soriano, JB; Wilton, LV, 2003
)
0.32
" No serious adverse events, abnormal pregnancy outcomes or deaths have been related to Ventolin MDI or Ventolin Evohaler."( Prospective observational cohort safety study to monitor the introduction of a non-CFC formulation of salbutamol with HFA134a in England.
Craig-McFeely, PM; Maier, WC; Shakir, SA; Soriano, JB; Wilton, LV, 2003
)
0.32
" The incidence of adverse effects (except for an increase in oral candidiasis with FSC and FP) were similar among the treatment groups."( The efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (250 microg)/salmeterol (50 microg) combined in the Diskus inhaler for the treatment of COPD.
Darken, P; Davis, S; Hanania, NA; Horstman, D; Lee, B; Reisner, C; Shah, T, 2003
)
0.32
" Primary safety variables were asthma-related and nonasthma-related serious adverse events (SAE)s and adverse events (AE)s resulting in discontinuation (DAE)s."( Formoterol as relief medication in asthma: a worldwide safety and effectiveness trial.
Aubier, M; Bengtsson, T; Campbell, M; Huang, S; Lindh, A; Pauwels, RA; Petermann, W; Schwabe, G; Sears, MR; Villasante, C, 2003
)
0.32
"Despite concerns in the 1970s and 1980s about the safety of short-acting beta2-agonists, it is now generally accepted that these agents, used at appropriate doses, provide safe and effective treatment for asthma symptoms."( State of the art in beta2-agonist therapy: a safety review of long-acting agents.
Rabe, KF, 2003
)
0.32
" Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), pulse, blood pressure, electrocardiogram, adverse events and urine formoterol were assessed."( Dose-related efficacy and safety of formoterol (Oxis) Turbuhaler compared with salmeterol Diskhaler in children with asthma.
Honomichlová, H; Kopriva, F; Matulka, M; Pohunek, P; Rybnícek, O; Svobodová, T, 2004
)
0.32
" Our aim was to establish whether adverse effects of SABAs are greater at higher than normal doses and after withdrawing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy."( Adverse effects of short-acting beta-agonists: potential impact when anti-inflammatory therapy is inadequate.
Cowan, JO; Flannery, EM; Herbison, GP; Smith, AD; Taylor, DR; Wraight, JM, 2004
)
0.32
" No patients discontinued due to treatment-related adverse events."( Safety and tolerability of high-dose formoterol (Aerolizer) and salbutamol (pMDI) in patients with mild/moderate, persistent asthma.
Ayre, G; Dobson, C; Horowitz, A; Kruse, M; Rosenkranz, B, 2005
)
0.33
" Both treatments were well tolerated, and the adverse reactions showed no significant difference between the two groups."( [Evaluation of the clinical efficacy and the safety of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate accuhaler compared to budesonide turbuhalar in the control of adult asthma].
Cai, BQ; Chen, BY; Chen, XD; Feng, YL; Guo, XJ; Kang, J; Li, Q; Lin, YP; Qiu, C; Shen, HH; Sun, TY; Tao, JJ; Wang, DQ; Xiao, BR; Xie, CM; Xu, YP; Yin, KS; Zhang, DP; Zheng, JP; Zhong, NS; Zhou, JY; Zhou, X, 2005
)
0.33
"Sputum induction was found to be a safe procedure for obtaining clinical samples from children and adolescents even during exacerbations, allowing for clinical and functional limitations."( [Induced sputum in children and adolescents with asthma: safety, clinical applicability and inflammatory cells aspects in stable patients and during exacerbation].
Bussamra, MH; Martins, MA; Nunes, Mdo P; Palomino, AL; Rodrigues, JC; Saraiva-Romanholo, BM,
)
0.13
" Safety was assessed according to adverse events recorded."( Efficacy and safety of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate delivered via a hydrofluoroalkane metered dose inhaler in Chinese patients with moderate asthma poorly controlled with inhaled corticosteroids.
Du, X; Humphries, M; Jiang, J; Wang, L; You-Ning, L, 2005
)
0.33
" Safety evaluations were based on clinical adverse events and COPD exacerbations."( The efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate/salmeterol and ipratropium/albuterol for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an eight-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study.
Brown, CP; Emmett, A; Hanania, NA; Kalberg, C; Knobil, K; Make, B; ZuWallack, R, 2005
)
0.55
" The type and incidence of adverse events were similar between the 2 groups."( The efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate/salmeterol and ipratropium/albuterol for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an eight-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study.
Brown, CP; Emmett, A; Hanania, NA; Kalberg, C; Knobil, K; Make, B; ZuWallack, R, 2005
)
0.55
"Although large surveys have documented the favourable safety profile of beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (beta(2)-agonists) and, above all, that of the long-acting agents, the presence in the literature of reports of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with obstructive airway disease must induce physicians to consider this eventuality."( Inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonists: cardiovascular safety in patients with obstructive lung disease.
Cazzola, M; Donner, CF; Matera, MG, 2005
)
0.33
" The overall incidence of adverse events was 59% for fluticasone propionate-salmeterol and 57% for fluticasone propionate."( The safety of twice-daily treatment with fluticasone propionate and salmeterol in pediatric patients with persistent asthma.
Dorinsky, P; Ellsworth, A; House, K; LaForce, C; Malone, R; Nimmagadda, S; Schoaf, L, 2005
)
0.33
" Treatment with high-dose formoterol and salbutamol was equally well tolerated, with no reports of serious adverse events."( Safety and tolerability of high-dose formoterol (via Aerolizer) and salbutamol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Ayre, G; Dobson, C; Fitoussi, S; Horowitz, A; Kruse, M; Rosenkranz, B; Rouzier, R, 2006
)
0.33
"5 million adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports for 8620 drugs/biologics that are listed for 1191 Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction (COSTAR) terms of adverse effects."( Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
Benz, RD; Contrera, JF; Kruhlak, NL; Matthews, EJ; Weaver, JL, 2004
)
0.32
" While the exact mechanism for this known adverse effect of albuterol is not known, awareness of this adverse effect can be life saving to the patient."( Paradoxical bronchospasm: a potentially life threatening adverse effect of albuterol.
Nagajothi, N; Raghunathan, K, 2006
)
0.81
" Safety assessments included adverse events, 12-hour urinary cortisol excretion, and growth."( Efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate chlorofluorocarbon in 2- to 4-year-old patients with asthma: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Baker, JW; Blake, KV; Crim, C; Faris, MA; Kim, KT; Scott, CA; Wasserman, RL; Wu, W, 2006
)
0.33
" There is much to suggest that the adverse outcomes associated with LABA monotherapy have been due to "masking of inflammation" rather than a toxic effect of the drugs."( Long-acting beta-agonists in adult asthma: Evidence that these drugs are safe.
Nelson, HS, 2006
)
0.33
"Two very large, randomized, double-blind clinical trials performed in the United Kingdom and in the United States have suggested that addition of salmeteräE to usual asthma therapy is associated with a significant increase in the incidence of serious adverse events and asthma-related deaths compared with addition of albuterol or placebo to usual therapy in the same type of patients."( Serious adverse events and death associated with treatment using long-acting beta-agonists.
Martinez, FD,
)
0.3
" The percentage of patients who experienced at least 1 adverse event was similar in the 2 groups."( Efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate hydrofluoroalkane inhalation aerosol in pre-school-age children with asthma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Ceruti, E; Crim, C; Kleha, JF; Maspero, JF; Mehta, R; Qaqundah, PY; Scott, CA; Sugerman, RW; Wu, W, 2006
)
0.33
" The overall rate of adverse events was PBO 56."( Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of levalbuterol in subjects with COPD.
Andrews, C; Baumgartner, RA; Claus, R; D'Urzo, T; Donohue, JF; Parsey, MV; Schaefer, K; Sharma, S, 2006
)
0.59
" LABAs are well-tolerated in patients with COPD, with a low incidence of reported adverse events (AEs)."( Clinical safety of long-acting beta2-agonist and inhaled corticosteroid combination therapy in COPD.
Decramer, M; Ferguson, G, 2006
)
0.33
" Few adverse events were reported; all were mild or moderate in severity."( Efficacy and safety of single therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of indacaterol versus salmeterol and salbutamol in patients with asthma.
Barbier, M; Brookman, LJ; Elharrar, B; Fuhr, R; Knowles, LJ; Pascoe, S, 2007
)
0.34
" The sustained bronchodilation of indacaterol 1000 microg was not associated with sustained systemic adverse effects."( Efficacy and safety of single therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of indacaterol versus salmeterol and salbutamol in patients with asthma.
Barbier, M; Brookman, LJ; Elharrar, B; Fuhr, R; Knowles, LJ; Pascoe, S, 2007
)
0.34
"To compare the risk of total mortality and certain respiratory and cardiac adverse events among users of the two types of recommended long-acting bronchodilators, we conducted a cohort study."( Comparative safety of long-acting inhaled bronchodilators: a cohort study using the UK THIN primary care database.
Jara, M; Kesten, S; Lanes, SF; May, C; Wentworth, C, 2007
)
0.34
" The primary end point was the incidence of postrandomization adverse events."( Long-term safety study of levalbuterol administered via metered-dose inhaler in patients with asthma.
Baumgartner, RA; D'Urzo, A; Hamilos, DL; Levy, RJ; Marcus, M; McVicar, WK; Parsey, M; Tripp, K, 2007
)
0.63
"The overall incidence of adverse events was similar for levalbuterol (72."( Long-term safety study of levalbuterol administered via metered-dose inhaler in patients with asthma.
Baumgartner, RA; D'Urzo, A; Hamilos, DL; Levy, RJ; Marcus, M; McVicar, WK; Parsey, M; Tripp, K, 2007
)
0.87
"The aim of this review is to assess the risk of fatal and non-fatal serious adverse events in trials that randomised patients with chronic asthma to regular salmeterol versus placebo or regular short-acting beta(2)-agonists."( Regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Cates, MJ, 2008
)
0.35
" Unpublished data on mortality and serious adverse events was sought."( Regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Cates, MJ, 2008
)
0.35
" In 6 trials (2,766 patients), no serious adverse event data could be obtained."( Regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Cates, MJ, 2008
)
0.35
"In comparison with placebo, we have found an increased risk of serious adverse events with regular salmeterol."( Regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Cates, MJ, 2008
)
0.35
" This is a non-inferiority study where safety and efficacy outcomes were serially assessed, including adverse events, Baseline (BDI)/Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI), St."( A double-blind crossover study comparing the safety and efficacy of three weeks of Flu/Sal 250/50 bid plus albuterol 180 ug prn q4 hours to Flu/Sal 250/50 bid plus albuterol/Ipratropium bromide 2 puffs prn q4 hours in patients with chronic obstructive pul
Balkissoon, R; Make, B, 2008
)
0.56
"Acute administration of 3% and 7% HS appears to be safe and well-tolerated in most young children with CF."( Safety and tolerability of inhaled hypertonic saline in young children with cystic fibrosis.
Davis, SD; Dellon, EP; Donaldson, SH; Johnson, R, 2008
)
0.35
"The aim of this review is to assess the risk of fatal and non-fatal serious adverse events in trials that randomised patients with chronic asthma to regular formoterol versus placebo or regular short-acting beta(2)-agonists."( Regular treatment with formoterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Cates, MJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2008
)
0.35
" Unpublished data on mortality and serious adverse events were sought."( Regular treatment with formoterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Cates, MJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2008
)
0.35
" Non-fatal serious adverse event data could be obtained for all participants from published studies comparing formoterol and placebo but only 80% of those comparing formoterol with salbutamol or terbutaline."( Regular treatment with formoterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Cates, MJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2008
)
0.35
"In comparison with placebo, we have found an increased risk of serious adverse events with regular formoterol, and this does not appear to be abolished in patients taking inhaled corticosteroids."( Regular treatment with formoterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Cates, MJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2008
)
0.35
" Subgroup analysis suggests that children, patients receiving salmeterol, and a duration of treatment>12 weeks are associated with a higher risk of serious adverse effects; also there was a protective effect of concomitant use of ICS."( Safety of regular use of long-acting beta agonists as monotherapy or added to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma. A systematic review.
Castro-Rodriguez, JA; Marcos, LG; Moral, VP; Rodrigo, GJ, 2009
)
0.35
" Nevertheless, in spite of the protective effect of the ICS, children and salmeterol use still show an increased risk of non-fatal serious adverse events."( Safety of regular use of long-acting beta agonists as monotherapy or added to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma. A systematic review.
Castro-Rodriguez, JA; Marcos, LG; Moral, VP; Rodrigo, GJ, 2009
)
0.35
" The incidence of adverse events was low and similar between the two groups and events were of the type expected in this population."( Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus current care in the management of persistent asthma in Korea.
Chan, R; Jung, KS; Lee, YC; Park, SK; Shim, JJ; Uh, ST; Williams, AE, 2008
)
0.35
" Whether this association represents adverse effects of beta -agonist use or is entirely due to disease severity is a matter of ongoing debate."( Safety of long-acting beta2-agonists in the treatment of asthma.
Cazzola, M; Matera, MG, 2007
)
0.34
" The frequency of adverse events, COPD exacerbations, and use of short-acting bronchodilator agents were assessed throughout the study period."( Arformoterol and salmeterol in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a one year evaluation of safety and tolerance.
Baumgartner, RA; Donohue, JF; Goodwin, E; Grogan, DR; Hanania, NA; Hanrahan, JP; Sciarappa, KA, 2008
)
0.35
"Among treated subjects, the frequency of adverse events was similar for those taking arformoterol (90."( Arformoterol and salmeterol in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a one year evaluation of safety and tolerance.
Baumgartner, RA; Donohue, JF; Goodwin, E; Grogan, DR; Hanania, NA; Hanrahan, JP; Sciarappa, KA, 2008
)
0.35
"Increased BDNF concentrations may underly the adverse effects of salmeterol monotherapy on airway responsiveness in asthma."( Adverse effects of salmeterol in asthma: a neuronal perspective.
Bratke, K; Edner, A; Kuepper, M; Lindner, Y; Lommatzsch, M; Virchow, JC, 2009
)
0.35
" Adverse events, clinical laboratory test results, and vital signs were recorded throughout the 2 clinical studies."( Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, efficacy, and safety data from two randomized, double-blind studies in patients with asthma and an in vitro study comparing two dry-powder inhalers delivering a combination of salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone propiona
Daley-Yates, PT; Gillett, B; House, KW; Ortega, HG; Parkins, DA; Thomas, MJ, 2009
)
0.35
" Drug-related adverse events occurred in both groups (2 [dysphagia and tremor] in the RPID group and 3 [2 cases of dysphonia, 1 case of mucous-membrane irritation] in the Diskus group)."( Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, efficacy, and safety data from two randomized, double-blind studies in patients with asthma and an in vitro study comparing two dry-powder inhalers delivering a combination of salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone propiona
Daley-Yates, PT; Gillett, B; House, KW; Ortega, HG; Parkins, DA; Thomas, MJ, 2009
)
0.35
" The 2 SFC 50/250 inhalers were well tolerated and had comparable safety profiles; no serious adverse events were attributed to the study product."( Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, efficacy, and safety data from two randomized, double-blind studies in patients with asthma and an in vitro study comparing two dry-powder inhalers delivering a combination of salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone propiona
Daley-Yates, PT; Gillett, B; House, KW; Ortega, HG; Parkins, DA; Thomas, MJ, 2009
)
0.35
" Adverse effects linked to tocolysis were recorded."( Nicardipine versus salbutamol in the treatment of premature labor: comparison of their efficacy and side effects.
Abdennadheur, W; Amouri, H; Ben Amar, H; Gargouri, A; Guermazi, M; Hadj Taib, H; Kallel, W; Trabelsi, K; Zribi, A, 2008
)
0.35
" Overall, 37% of formoterol plus tiotropium recipients experienced adverse events versus 51% of those receiving placebo plus tiotropium."( Efficacy and safety of nebulized formoterol as add-on therapy in COPD patients receiving maintenance tiotropium bromide: Results from a 6-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.
Boota, A; Denis-Mize, K; Hanania, NA; Kerwin, E; Tomlinson, L, 2009
)
0.35
"The aim of this review is to assess the risk of fatal and non-fatal serious adverse events in trials that randomised patients with chronic asthma to regular salmeterol with inhaled corticosteroids versus the same dose of inhaled corticosteroids alone."( Regular treatment with salmeterol and inhaled steroids for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Jaeschke, R; Lasserson, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
" Unpublished data on mortality and serious adverse events were obtained from the sponsors, and from FDA submissions."( Regular treatment with salmeterol and inhaled steroids for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Jaeschke, R; Lasserson, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
" The overall risk of bias was low and data on serious adverse events were obtained from all studies."( Regular treatment with salmeterol and inhaled steroids for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Jaeschke, R; Lasserson, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
"No significant differences have been found in fatal or non-fatal serious adverse events in trials in which regular salmeterol has been randomly allocated with inhaled corticosteroids, in comparison to inhaled corticosteroids at the same dose."( Regular treatment with salmeterol and inhaled steroids for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Jaeschke, R; Lasserson, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
" Although, the response to bronchoconstriction in dogs and rats was different from humans, the two species presented ventilatory changes that highlight the potential adverse effect of test articles."( Respiratory safety pharmacology: positive control drug responses in Sprague-Dawley rats, Beagle dogs and cynomolgus monkeys.
Authier, S; Gauvin, D; Legaspi, M; Troncy, E, 2009
)
0.35
"An increase in serious adverse events with both regular formoterol and regular salmeterol in chronic asthma has been demonstrated in previous Cochrane reviews."( Regular treatment with formoterol versus regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
"We set out to compare the risks of mortality and non-fatal serious adverse events in trials which have randomised patients with chronic asthma to regular formoterol versus regular salmeterol."( Regular treatment with formoterol versus regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
" Unpublished data on mortality and serious adverse events were sought from the sponsors and authors."( Regular treatment with formoterol versus regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
" All studies were open label and recruited patients who were already taking inhaled corticosteroids for their asthma, and all studies contributed data on serious adverse events."( Regular treatment with formoterol versus regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
" Asthma-related serious adverse events were rare, and there were no reported asthma-related deaths."( Regular treatment with formoterol versus regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
"An increase in serious adverse events with both regular formoterol and regular salmeterol in chronic asthma has been demonstrated in comparison with placebo in previous Cochrane reviews."( Regular treatment with formoterol and an inhaled corticosteroid versus regular treatment with salmeterol and an inhaled corticosteroid for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2010
)
0.36
"We set out to compare the risks of mortality and non-fatal serious adverse events in trials which have randomised patients with chronic asthma to regular formoterol versus regular salmeterol, when each are used with an inhaled corticosteroid as part of the randomised treatment."( Regular treatment with formoterol and an inhaled corticosteroid versus regular treatment with salmeterol and an inhaled corticosteroid for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2010
)
0.36
" Unpublished data on mortality and serious adverse events were sought from the sponsors and authors."( Regular treatment with formoterol and an inhaled corticosteroid versus regular treatment with salmeterol and an inhaled corticosteroid for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2010
)
0.36
" Asthma-related serious adverse events were rare, and there were no reported asthma-related deaths."( Regular treatment with formoterol and an inhaled corticosteroid versus regular treatment with salmeterol and an inhaled corticosteroid for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2010
)
0.36
" Food and Drug Administration and featured in the labeling of drugs associated with serious adverse reactions."( FDA boxed warnings: how to prescribe drugs safely.
O'Connor, NR, 2010
)
0.36
" Assessments included adverse events, signs of adrenergic stimulation, electrocardiograms, and blood glucose and potassium levels."( Repeat dosing of albuterol via metered-dose inhaler in infants with acute obstructive airway disease: a randomized controlled safety trial.
Davis, AM; Ellsworth, A; Goodman, B; Kaashmiri, M; Lincourt, WR; Shepard, J; Trivedi, R, 2010
)
0.7
"Overall, adverse events occurred in 4 (9%) and 3 (7%) subjects in the 180-microg and 360-microg groups, respectively."( Repeat dosing of albuterol via metered-dose inhaler in infants with acute obstructive airway disease: a randomized controlled safety trial.
Davis, AM; Ellsworth, A; Goodman, B; Kaashmiri, M; Lincourt, WR; Shepard, J; Trivedi, R, 2010
)
0.7
"an increase in serious adverse events with both regular formoterol and regular salmeterol in chronic asthma has been demonstrated in comparison with placebo in previous Cochrane reviews."( Regular treatment with formoterol and an inhaled corticosteroid versus regular treatment with salmeterol and an inhaled corticosteroid for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2010
)
0.36
" Unpublished data on mortality and serious adverse events were sought from the sponsors and authors."( Regular treatment with formoterol and an inhaled corticosteroid versus regular treatment with salmeterol and an inhaled corticosteroid for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2010
)
0.36
" Asthma-related serious adverse events were rare, and there were no reported asthma-related deaths."( Regular treatment with formoterol and an inhaled corticosteroid versus regular treatment with salmeterol and an inhaled corticosteroid for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2010
)
0.36
" Adverse events (AEs) were analysed overall and according to Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration (APTC) criteria and baseline cardiovascular risk factors."( Cardio- and cerebrovascular safety of indacaterol vs formoterol, salmeterol, tiotropium and placebo in COPD.
Chung, KF; Felser, JM; Hu, H; Rueegg, P; Worth, H, 2011
)
0.37
" However, several studies have indicated an increased risk of asthma mortality and asthma-related serious adverse events and the FDA recently mandated restrictions to the use of LABAs in asthma."( Safe use of long-acting β-agonists: what have we learnt?
Sears, MR, 2011
)
0.37
" Add-on therapy with LABA is effective and safe if the dose of ICS is adequate to treat airway inflammation."( Safe use of long-acting β-agonists: what have we learnt?
Sears, MR, 2011
)
0.37
" Other endpoints included adverse events and pulmonary function."( A cumulative dose, safety and tolerability study of arformoterol in pediatric subjects with stable asthma.
Curry, L; Goodwin, E; Hanrahan, JP; Hinkle, J; Hinson, J; Kerwin, E; Sciarappa, K, 2011
)
0.37
" Adverse events were infrequent and differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec and peak expiratory flow across treatment groups were not clinically meaningful."( A cumulative dose, safety and tolerability study of arformoterol in pediatric subjects with stable asthma.
Curry, L; Goodwin, E; Hanrahan, JP; Hinkle, J; Hinson, J; Kerwin, E; Sciarappa, K, 2011
)
0.37
" Adverse events (mostly mild or moderate) were reported for 52% and 46% of patients receiving indacaterol and placebo, respectively, and serious adverse events for 4% and 5%."( Bronchodilator efficacy and safety of indacaterol 150 μg once daily in patients with COPD: an analysis of pooled data.
Bleecker, ER; Kramer, B; Owen, R; Siler, T, 2011
)
0.37
" Treatment time and adverse events were recorded."( A prospective, comparative trial of standard and breath-actuated nebulizer: efficacy, safety, and satisfaction.
Arunthari, V; Bruinsma, RS; Johnson, MM; Lee, AS, 2012
)
0.38
" Additionally, the BAN was associated with a lower occurrence of adverse events."( A prospective, comparative trial of standard and breath-actuated nebulizer: efficacy, safety, and satisfaction.
Arunthari, V; Bruinsma, RS; Johnson, MM; Lee, AS, 2012
)
0.38
" Pre- and post-treatment vital signs did not differ between groups, but use of the BAN was associated with a shorter duration and a lower occurrence of adverse events."( A prospective, comparative trial of standard and breath-actuated nebulizer: efficacy, safety, and satisfaction.
Arunthari, V; Bruinsma, RS; Johnson, MM; Lee, AS, 2012
)
0.38
"An increase in serious adverse events with both regular formoterol and regular salmeterol in chronic asthma has been demonstrated in previous Cochrane reviews."( Regular treatment with formoterol versus regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2012
)
0.38
"We set out to compare the risks of mortality and non-fatal serious adverse events in trials which have randomised patients with chronic asthma to regular formoterol versus regular salmeterol."( Regular treatment with formoterol versus regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2012
)
0.38
" We sought unpublished data on mortality and serious adverse events from the sponsors and authors."( Regular treatment with formoterol versus regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2012
)
0.38
" All studies were open label and recruited patients who were already taking inhaled corticosteroids for their asthma, and all studies contributed data on serious adverse events."( Regular treatment with formoterol versus regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2012
)
0.38
" Asthma-related serious adverse events were rare and there were no reported asthma-related deaths."( Regular treatment with formoterol versus regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Lasserson, TJ, 2012
)
0.38
" Secondary endpoints included pulmonary function, plethysmography, pharmacokinetics of GSK233705 and salmeterol, adverse events (AEs), electrocardiograms (ECGs), vital signs, and laboratory parameters."( Safety and efficacy of dual therapy with GSK233705 and salmeterol versus monotherapy with salmeterol, tiotropium, or placebo in a crossover pilot study in partially reversible COPD patients.
Baggen, S; Beier, J; Brooks, J; Cahn, A; Deans, A; Maden, C; Mehta, R; van Noord, J, 2012
)
0.38
"This study concludes that sublingual immunotherapy is safe during pregnancy and is also safe when initiated for the first time in a pregnant patient."( A prospective study on the safety of sublingual immunotherapy in pregnancy.
Shaikh, SW; Shaikh, WA, 2012
)
0.38
"The aim of this review is to assess the risk of fatal and non-fatal serious adverse events in trials that randomised patients with chronic asthma to regular formoterol versus placebo or regular short-acting beta(2)-agonists."( Regular treatment with formoterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Cates, MJ, 2012
)
0.38
" We sought unpublished data on mortality and serious adverse events."( Regular treatment with formoterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Cates, MJ, 2012
)
0.38
" Non-fatal serious adverse event data could be obtained for all participants from published studies comparing formoterol and placebo but only 80% of those comparing formoterol with salbutamol or terbutaline."( Regular treatment with formoterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Cates, MJ, 2012
)
0.38
"In comparison with placebo, we have found an increased risk of serious adverse events with regular formoterol, and this does not appear to be abolished in patients taking inhaled corticosteroids."( Regular treatment with formoterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Cates, MJ, 2012
)
0.38
" We extracted the data relating to children from each review and from new trials found in the updated searches (including risks of bias, study characteristics, serious adverse event outcomes, and control arm event rates)."( Safety of regular formoterol or salmeterol in children with asthma: an overview of Cochrane reviews.
Cates, CJ; Oleszczuk, M; Stovold, E; Wieland, LS, 2012
)
0.38
" There are probably an additional three children per 1000 who suffer a non-fatal serious adverse event on combination therapy in comparison to ICS over three months."( Safety of regular formoterol or salmeterol in children with asthma: an overview of Cochrane reviews.
Cates, CJ; Oleszczuk, M; Stovold, E; Wieland, LS, 2012
)
0.38
" We summarized data relating to exacerbations and adverse events, particularly events related to COPD."( The safety of long-acting β2-agonists in the treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Decramer, ML; Hanania, NA; Lötvall, JO; Yawn, BP, 2013
)
0.39
"From 20 studies examined (8774 LABA-treated patients), there was no evidence of an association between LABA treatment and increased exacerbations, COPD-related adverse events, or deaths."( The safety of long-acting β2-agonists in the treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Decramer, ML; Hanania, NA; Lötvall, JO; Yawn, BP, 2013
)
0.39
" Secondary outcome measures included quality of life as measured by the Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire with Standardised Activities [PAQLQ(S)] and the Paediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ); time from randomisation to first exacerbation requiring treatment with a short course of oral corticosteroids; school attendance; hospital admissions; amount of rescue beta-2 agonist therapy prescribed; time from randomisation to treatment withdrawal (because of lack of efficacy or side effects); lung function at 48 weeks (as assessed by spirometry); cost-effectiveness; adverse events."( Management of Asthma in School age Children On Therapy (MASCOT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study of efficacy and safety.
James, M; Lenney, W; McKay, AJ; Price, D; Tudur Smith, C; Williamson, PR, 2013
)
0.39
" Adverse events were similar between the groups except for nervous system disorders, which were more frequently reported on fluticasone plus montelukast."( Management of Asthma in School age Children On Therapy (MASCOT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study of efficacy and safety.
James, M; Lenney, W; McKay, AJ; Price, D; Tudur Smith, C; Williamson, PR, 2013
)
0.39
" Systemic pharmacodynamics (potassium, heart rate, glucose and QTc), adverse events and systemic pharmacokinetics were also assessed."( Bronchodilation and safety of supratherapeutic doses of salbutamol or ipratropium bromide added to single dose GSK961081 in patients with moderate to severe COPD.
Ambery, C; Norris, V, 2013
)
0.39
"To assess the risk of mortality and non-fatal serious adverse events in trials which randomised patients with chronic asthma to regular salmeterol and inhaled corticosteroids in comparison to the same dose of inhaled corticosteroids."( Regular treatment with salmeterol and inhaled steroids for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Ferrer, M; Jaeschke, R; Schmidt, S, 2013
)
0.39
" We obtained unpublished data on mortality and serious adverse events from the sponsors, and from FDA submissions."( Regular treatment with salmeterol and inhaled steroids for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Ferrer, M; Jaeschke, R; Schmidt, S, 2013
)
0.39
" We judged that the overall risk of bias was low, and we obtained data on serious adverse events from all studies."( Regular treatment with salmeterol and inhaled steroids for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Ferrer, M; Jaeschke, R; Schmidt, S, 2013
)
0.39
"We found no statistically significant differences in fatal or non-fatal serious adverse events in trials in which regular salmeterol was randomly allocated with ICS, in comparison to ICS alone at the same dose."( Regular treatment with salmeterol and inhaled steroids for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Ferrer, M; Jaeschke, R; Schmidt, S, 2013
)
0.39
"The adverse environmental effects of CFC-pMDIs stimulated the invention of novel delivery systems including the Respimat SMI."( Efficacy and safety of eco-friendly inhalers: focus on combination ipratropium bromide and albuterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Panos, RJ, 2013
)
0.61
" The two groups were compared with respect to symptom scores of cough, wheeze, respiratory rate, wheezing sound, three depression sign and peak expiratory flow, as well as adverse events."( [Efficacy and safety of tulobuterol patch versus oral salbutamol sulfate in children with mild or moderate acute attack of bronchial asthma: a comparative study].
Bao, YX; Lin, Q; Liu, QH, 2013
)
0.39
" One child developed hand trembling in the salbutamol group, while no adverse event occurred in the tulobuterol group."( [Efficacy and safety of tulobuterol patch versus oral salbutamol sulfate in children with mild or moderate acute attack of bronchial asthma: a comparative study].
Bao, YX; Lin, Q; Liu, QH, 2013
)
0.39
" Both treatments were well tolerated, with no clinically relevant effect on urinary cortisol excretion or vital signs and no treatment-related serious adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol compared with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination in adult and adolescent patients with persistent asthma: a randomized trial.
Bateman, ED; Bleecker, ER; Busse, WW; Ellsworth, A; Jacques, L; Lötvall, J; Medley, H; O'Byrne, PM; Woodcock, A, 2013
)
0.39
" Six patients in the FF/VI (2%) and three in the FP/SAL (1%) arm experienced serious adverse events, none of which were considered to be drug related."( A comparison of the efficacy and safety of once-daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol with twice-daily fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in moderate to very severe COPD.
Agustí, A; Barnes, N; Bourbeau, J; Crim, C; De Backer, W; de Teresa, L; Locantore, N; Zvarich, MT, 2014
)
0.4
"Our findings suggest that BT is safe for 5 years after BT in patients with severe refractory asthma."( Safety of bronchial thermoplasty in patients with severe refractory asthma.
Armstrong, B; Chung, KF; Corris, PA; Cox, G; Laviolette, M; Niven, RM; Pavord, ID; Shargill, NS; Thomson, NC, 2013
)
0.39
" Overall incidence of adverse events (including COPD exacerbations) was 55·4% (143 of 258) for the QVA149 group and 60·2% (159 of 264) for the SFC group."( Efficacy and safety of once-daily QVA149 compared with twice-daily salmeterol-fluticasone in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ILLUMINATE): a randomised, double-blind, parallel group study.
Alagappan, VK; Banerji, D; Bateman, ED; Chen, H; D'Andrea, P; Pallante, J; Vogelmeier, CF, 2013
)
0.39
" Ascoril expectorant caused no adverse reactions and was well tolerated by the patients."( [Results of international multicentre non-interventional clinical study of the effectiveness and safety of ascoril expectorant for the treatment of cough in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan].
Abuova, GT; An, ÉA; Ermekbaeva, BA; Guliaev, AE; Nurgozhin, TS; Zhaugasheva, SK, 2013
)
0.39
" Clinical trials record these safety outcomes as non-fatal and fatal serious adverse events (SAEs), respectively."( Safety of regular formoterol or salmeterol in adults with asthma: an overview of Cochrane reviews.
Cates, CJ; Kew, KM; Oleszczuk, M; Wieland, LS, 2014
)
0.4
"To assess the risk of serious adverse events in adults with asthma treated with regular maintenance formoterol or salmeterol compared with placebo, or when randomly assigned in combination with regular ICS, compared with the same dose of ICS."( Safety of regular formoterol or salmeterol in adults with asthma: an overview of Cochrane reviews.
Cates, CJ; Kew, KM; Oleszczuk, M; Wieland, LS, 2014
)
0.4
"Available evidence from the reviews of randomised trials cannot definitively rule out an increased risk of fatal serious adverse events when regular formoterol or salmeterol was added to an inhaled corticosteroid (as background or as randomly assigned treatment) in adults or adolescents with asthma."( Safety of regular formoterol or salmeterol in adults with asthma: an overview of Cochrane reviews.
Cates, CJ; Kew, KM; Oleszczuk, M; Wieland, LS, 2014
)
0.4
"All airway adverse events (AEs) were of mild or moderate severity."( Safety and tolerability of inhaled loxapine in subjects with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease--two randomized controlled trials.
Cassella, JV; Fishman, RS; Greos, LS; Gross, N; Meltzer, EO; Spangenthal, S; Spyker, DA, 2014
)
0.4
" Pooled adverse events (FF/VI 27%; FP/SAL 28%) and serious adverse events (FF/VI 2%; FP/SAL 3%) were similar between treatments."( Efficacy and safety of once-daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (100/25 mcg) versus twice-daily fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (250/50 mcg) in COPD patients.
Crim, C; Dransfield, MT; Feldman, G; Korenblat, P; LaForce, CF; Locantore, N; Martinez, FJ; Pistolesi, M; Watkins, ML, 2014
)
0.4
" The profile of treatment-emergent adverse events judged as related to abediterol was consistent with that seen after adrenergic stimulation and occurred exclusively in patients who received abediterol 10 μg or 25 μg."( Abediterol (LAS100977), a novel long-acting β2-agonist: efficacy, safety and tolerability in persistent asthma.
Beier, J; de Miquel, G; Fuhr, R; Jiménez, E; Massana, E; Ruiz, S; Seoane, B, 2014
)
0.4
" This systematic review tested the hypothesis that the bronchodilator effect of the LABA/LAMA combination, umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VIL), would translate into better outcomes without incurring increased adverse events (AEs)."( A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Umeclidinium and Vilanterol for the Treatment of COPD.
Neffen, H; Rodrigo, GJ, 2015
)
0.42
" Primary outcomes were trough FEV1, serious adverse events (SAEs), and serious cardiovascular events (SCVEs)."( A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Umeclidinium and Vilanterol for the Treatment of COPD.
Neffen, H; Rodrigo, GJ, 2015
)
0.42
" The incidence of on-treatment adverse events (AEs) was 48% with FF/VI 200/25 mcg and 37-40% with other treatments."( Efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (50/25 mcg; 100/25 mcg; 200/25 mcg) in Asian patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Crim, C; de Guia, T; Newlands, AH; Wang, C; Wang-Jairaj, J; Zheng, J; Zhong, N, 2015
)
0.42
" Long-acting β-2 agonists (LABAs) used in combination with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) don't appear to increase all-cause mortality or serious adverse events in patients with persistent asthma compared with ICS alone."( HelpDesk answers: is it safe to add long-acting β-2 agonists to inhaled corticosteroids in patients with persistent asthma?
Madlon-Kay, DJ; Townsend, L, 2015
)
0.42
" The efficacy and adverse events of SI were analyzed."( Diagnostic yield and safety of sputum induction with nebulized racemic salbutamol versus hypertonic saline in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis.
Keeratichananont, S; Keeratichananont, W; Nilmoje, T; Rittatorn, J, 2015
)
0.42
"During both 12-week studies and the 12-week double-blind phase of the 52-week study, adverse events were more common with placebo MDPI (50%; n = 333) than albuterol MDPI (40%; n = 321); most frequent were upper respiratory tract infection (placebo MDPI 11%, albuterol MDPI 10%), nasopharyngitis (6%, 5%), and headache (6%, 4%)."( Twelve- and 52-week safety of albuterol multidose dry powder inhaler in patients with persistent asthma.
Iverson, H; Miller, D; O'Brien, C; Raphael, G; Taveras, H, 2016
)
0.92
" In conclusion, the proposed hydrogels represent a safe and efficient buccal drug delivery platform."( Poloxamer bioadhesive hydrogel for buccal drug delivery: Cytotoxicity and trans-epithelial permeability evaluations using TR146 human buccal epithelial cell line.
Boudy, V; Dumortier, G; Maury, M; Mignet, N; Olivier, E; Rat, P; Scherman, D; Seguin, J; Zeng, N, 2015
)
0.42
" Adverse events were comparable across groups."( Efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide/albuterol compared with albuterol in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a randomized controlled trial.
Bleecker, ER; Busse, WW; Donohue, JF; Garfinkel, S; Ghafouri, M; Manuel, RC; Schlenker-Herceg, R; Wise, R; Zubek, VB, 2016
)
0.7
"Many adverse drug reactions are caused by the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-dependent activation of drugs into reactive metabolites."( Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
Jones, LH; Nadanaciva, S; Rana, P; Will, Y, 2016
)
0.43
" Efficacy and safety were evaluated by measuring the baseline-adjusted percent-predicted FEV1 (PPFEV1) area under the time curve over 6 hours (AUC0-6) after the dose and adverse events, respectively."( Albuterol multidose dry powder inhaler efficacy and safety versus placebo in children with asthma.
Iverson, H; LaForce, C; Shore, P; Taveras, H, 2017
)
1.9
"Sputum induction is successful and safe in COPD."( The success and safety profile of sputum induction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: An Indian experience.
Fernandes, L; Mesquita, AM, 2017
)
0.46
"Perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAE) remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the paediatric population."( Premedication with salbutamol prior to surgery does not decrease the risk of perioperative respiratory adverse events in school-aged children.
Drake-Brockman, TFE; Hall, GL; Ramgolam, A; Slevin, L; Sommerfield, D; von Ungern-Sternberg, BS; Zhang, G, 2017
)
0.46
" Safety in terms of adverse events (AEs) was also examined."( Real-life effectiveness and safety of salbutamol Steri-Neb™ vs. Ventolin Nebules® for exacerbations in patients with COPD: Historical cohort study.
Davis, E; Gefen, E; Gopalan, G; McDonald, R; Ming, SWY; Price, DB; Thomas, V, 2018
)
0.48
"  OBJECTIVES: To assess risks of mortality and non-fatal serious adverse events (SAEs) in trials that randomised participants with chronic asthma to regular salmeterol and ICS versus the same dose of ICS."( Inhaled steroids with and without regular salmeterol for asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Ferrer, M; Sayer, B; Schmidt, S; Waterson, S, 2018
)
0.48
"Non-fatal serious adverse eventsA total of 332 adults receiving regular salmeterol with ICS experienced a non-fatal SAE of any cause, compared to 282 adults receiving regular ICS."( Inhaled steroids with and without regular salmeterol for asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Ferrer, M; Sayer, B; Schmidt, S; Waterson, S, 2018
)
0.48
"We did not find a difference in the risk of death or serious adverse events in either adults or children."( Inhaled steroids with and without regular salmeterol for asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; Ferrer, M; Sayer, B; Schmidt, S; Waterson, S, 2018
)
0.48
" Up to half of children having this procedure experience a perioperative respiratory adverse event."( Effect of Albuterol Premedication vs Placebo on the Occurrence of Respiratory Adverse Events in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomies: The REACT Randomized Clinical Trial.
Drake-Brockman, TFE; Hall, GL; Slevin, L; Sommerfield, D; von Ungern-Sternberg, BS; Zhang, G, 2019
)
0.92
"To determine whether inhaled albuterol sulfate (salbutamol sulfate) premedication decreases the risk of perioperative respiratory adverse events in children undergoing anesthesia for tonsillectomy."( Effect of Albuterol Premedication vs Placebo on the Occurrence of Respiratory Adverse Events in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomies: The REACT Randomized Clinical Trial.
Drake-Brockman, TFE; Hall, GL; Slevin, L; Sommerfield, D; von Ungern-Sternberg, BS; Zhang, G, 2019
)
1.21
"Occurrence of perioperative respiratory adverse events (bronchospasm, laryngospasm, airway obstruction, desaturation, coughing, and stridor) until discharge from the postanesthesia care unit."( Effect of Albuterol Premedication vs Placebo on the Occurrence of Respiratory Adverse Events in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomies: The REACT Randomized Clinical Trial.
Drake-Brockman, TFE; Hall, GL; Slevin, L; Sommerfield, D; von Ungern-Sternberg, BS; Zhang, G, 2019
)
0.92
" Perioperative respiratory adverse events occurred in 67 of 241 children (27."( Effect of Albuterol Premedication vs Placebo on the Occurrence of Respiratory Adverse Events in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomies: The REACT Randomized Clinical Trial.
Drake-Brockman, TFE; Hall, GL; Slevin, L; Sommerfield, D; von Ungern-Sternberg, BS; Zhang, G, 2019
)
0.92
"Albuterol premedication administered before tonsillectomy under general anesthesia in young children resulted in a clinically significant reduction in rates of perioperative respiratory adverse events compared with the rates in children who received placebo."( Effect of Albuterol Premedication vs Placebo on the Occurrence of Respiratory Adverse Events in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomies: The REACT Randomized Clinical Trial.
Drake-Brockman, TFE; Hall, GL; Slevin, L; Sommerfield, D; von Ungern-Sternberg, BS; Zhang, G, 2019
)
2.36
" First and second groups served as normal and toxic control were given distilled water 6 ml/ kg while third, fourth and fifth experimental groups were given N-acetylcysteine (300 mg/ kg), prazosin (0."( Hepatoprotective Effect Of Prazosin Is Comparable To N-Acetylcysteine In Acetaminophen Induced Hepatotoxicity In Mice.
Chiragh, S; Hussain, M; Shad, MN; Sulaiman, S,
)
0.13
" Secondary outcomes included risk of hospitalization, pulmonary function, asthma control level, quality of life, and adverse events (AEs)."( Efficacy and safety of salmeterol/fluticasone compared with montelukast alone (or add-on therapy to fluticasone) in the treatment of bronchial asthma in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hong, JG; Lu, J; Qin, Z; Zhou, XJ, 2021
)
0.62
" During the treatment, the remission time of typical respiratory manifestations was recorded, and the adverse reactions were observed."( Efficacy and safety of combined doxofylline and salbutamol in treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Bao, H; Du, X; Zhao, D, 2021
)
0.62
" In addition, the adverse reaction rate had no significant difference between two groups (p>0."( Efficacy and safety of combined doxofylline and salbutamol in treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Bao, H; Du, X; Zhao, D, 2021
)
0.62
"Use of an RT-driven, score-based pathway for initiation and discontinuation of continuous albuterol for treatment of pediatric asthma exacerbation was safe and effective in the PICU and step-down unit."( Safe and Effective Use of Score-Based Continuous Albuterol Therapy in a Pathway for Treatment of Pediatric Asthma Exacerbation.
Berlinski, A; Carper, NL; Danner, NP; Lloyd, TL; Willis, LD, 2022
)
1.2
"In contrast to published literature showing that benzalkonium chloride may be associated with a longer duration of continuous albuterol nebulization and hospital LOS, our study demonstrated that benzalkonium chloride-containing albuterol is safe for continuous nebulization in critically ill children and not associated with worse outcomes."( Effectiveness and Safety of Albuterol Solutions With and Without Benzalkonium Chloride.
Adams, CK; Al-Subu, AM; Bogenschutz, MC; DeSanti, RL; Friestrom, E; Langkamp, MR; Lasarev, MR; Terry, E; Vanderloo, JP; Yngsdal-Krenz, RA, 2023
)
1.41
" The primary safety outcome was a composite of serious adverse events (SAEs) and/or adverse events leading to discontinuation (DAEs); the primary effectiveness outcome was time-to-first exacerbation."( Safety and Effectiveness of As-Needed Formoterol in Asthma Patients Taking Inhaled Corticosteroid (ICS)-Formoterol or ICS-Salmeterol Maintenance Therapy.
Anderson, GP; Brusselle, G; Gustafson, P; Jorup, C; Lamarca, R; Reddel, HK, 2023
)
0.91

Pharmacokinetics

Sensitivity was assessed in terms of magnitudes of ED(50), the estimated albuterol dose required to achieve 50 % of the fitted maximal value of the pharmacodynamic effect above baseline, and change in response as a function of dose. Separate population pharmacokinetic models were developed for (R)- and (S)-al buterol.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Patients with renal failure but not asthmatics show changed pharmacokinetic profiles."( Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of the beta-2-agonists terbutaline, salbutamol and fenoterol.
Hochhaus, G; Möllmann, H, 1992
)
0.28
"The study represents the investigation on pharmacodynamic lung function testing in 40 patients (21 with extrinsic asthma and 19 with intrinsic asthma)."( [Pharmacokinetic testing of patients with bronchial asthma].
Kotarac, S; Lucić, S; Muhić, H; Pavicić, F; Popović-Grle, S,
)
0.13
" The time to peak concentration, half-life and peak-to-trough ratio were similar for both formulations."( Pharmacokinetic characteristics of a novel controlled-release sprinkle formulation of salbutamol.
Devane, J; Martin, M; Mulligan, S, 1991
)
0.28
" The mean Cmax for Volmax; administered after a meal was 19% lower than that of the drug administered in a fasting state (3."( Albuterol extended-release products: effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of single oral doses of Volmax and Proventil Repetabs in healthy male volunteers.
Donn, KH; Hussey, EK; Lahey, AP; Pakes, GE; Powell, JR, 1991
)
1.72
" The steady-state pharmacokinetic profile of Volmax 8 mg orally every 12 hours for 3 days was compared with that of Proventil Repetabs 8 mg orally every 12 hours for 3 days in a randomized, two-way, crossover study in 23 healthy men."( Albuterol extended-release products: a comparison of steady-state pharmacokinetics.
Donn, KH; Hussey, EK; Powell, JR, 1991
)
1.72
" The isolated vagus nerve-trachea tube preparation of the guinea-pig is well suited for the concommitant study of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of bronchodilator drugs."( Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic aspects on the transport of bronchodilator drugs through the tracheal epithelium of the guinea-pig.
Jeppsson, AB; Roos, C; Waldeck, B; Widmark, E, 1989
)
0.28
"Salbutamol was administered intravenously to 5 patients with renal function impairment for estimation its pharmacokinetic parameters."( Pharmacokinetics of intravenous salbutamol in renal insufficiency and its biological effects.
Luquel, L; Mory, B; Offenstadt, G; Olive, G; Rey, E; Richard, MO, 1989
)
0.28
" There were no differences between O and SL for any of the pharmacodynamic parameters."( Pharmacokinetics, efficacy and adverse effects of sublingual salbutamol in patients with asthma.
Clark, GA; Clark, RA; Dhillon, DP; Lipworth, BJ; McDevitt, DG; Moreland, TA; Struthers, AD, 1989
)
0.28
" Thus a stimulation of the mucociliary transport rate by the other major pharmacodynamic mechanisms, secretagogue activity and stimulation of pulmonary surfactant, has to be considered."( Pharmacodynamic mechanism and therapeutic activity of ambroxol in animal experiments.
Disse, BG; Ziegler, HW, 1987
)
0.27
" Limited pharmacokinetic data suggest a long distribution phase, a terminal half-life of 3-8 hours, and 10-20% oral bioavailability."( Albuterol: an adrenergic agent for use in the treatment of asthma pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and clinical use.
Ahrens, RC; Smith, GD,
)
1.57
"The safety, tolerability and systemic pharmacodynamic activity of the salmeterol/HFA134a inhaler, the current salmeterol inhaler, and placebo (HFA134a) were compared in 12 healthy volunteers in a double blind, randomised crossover study using a cumulative dosing design."( Salmeterol inhaler using a non-chlorinated propellant, HFA134a: systemic pharmacodynamic activity in healthy volunteers.
Kirby, SM; Smith, J; Ventresca, GP, 1995
)
0.29
"In healthy volunteers the salmeterol/HFA134a inhaler is at least as safe and well tolerated as the current salmeterol inhaler, and has similar systemic pharmacodynamic activity."( Salmeterol inhaler using a non-chlorinated propellant, HFA134a: systemic pharmacodynamic activity in healthy volunteers.
Kirby, SM; Smith, J; Ventresca, GP, 1995
)
0.29
" The plasma pharmacokinetic profiles of nedocromil sodium and the pharmacodynamic effect (bronchodilation) of salbutamol were evaluated."( Equivalence of pharmacokinetic characteristics and bronchodilating effect between two combined formulations of nedocromil sodium and salbutamol: MDI and nebulizer solution.
Bustacchini, S; Pistelli, R; Reggio, S; Valente, S, 1996
)
0.29
"001) were found between the NebuChamber (N) and the Turbuhaler (T) for salbutamol Cmax and Cav."( Lung delivery of salbutamol by dry powder inhaler (Turbuhaler) and small volume antistatic metal spacer (Airomir CFC-free MDI plus NebuChamber).
Clark, DJ; Lipworth, BJ, 1997
)
0.3
" Apart from causing a small increase in plasma potassium, the distomer had no effect on any pharmacodynamic parameter."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single oral doses of albuterol and its enantiomers in humans.
Boulton, DW; Fawcett, JP, 1997
)
0.54
"In order to obtain pharmacokinetic data from studies in humans, a sensitive and selective assay for the quantification of salbutamol in human plasma samples was required."( Rapid pharmacokinetic screening of salbutamol in plasma samples by column-switching high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry.
Sauter, T; Schmeer, K; Schmid, J, 1997
)
0.3
" The mean half-life of distribution was 17."( Pharmacokinetics of (R,S)-Albuterol after aerosol inhalation in healthy adult volunteers.
Anderson, PJ; Breen, P; Compadre, CM; Gann, L; Hiller, FC; Logsdon, TW; Zhou, X, 1998
)
0.6
" Future pharmacodynamic studies of beta2-agonists should include determination of 02-adrenergic receptor genotype."( Impact of genetic polymorphisms of the beta2-adrenergic receptor on albuterol bronchodilator pharmacodynamics.
Eberle, LV; Johnson, JA; Lima, JJ; Mohamed, MH; Self, TH; Thomason, DB, 1999
)
0.54
" The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that numerical descriptors of powder flow properties predict aerosol dispersion and pharmacodynamic effect."( Pharmaceutical dry powder aerosols: correlation of powder properties with dose delivery and implications for pharmacodynamic effect.
Concessio, NM; Hickey, AJ; Knowles, MR; VanOort, MM, 1999
)
0.3
" Pharmacodynamic evaluations of bronchodilation were performed in guinea pigs, for selected formulations."( Pharmaceutical dry powder aerosols: correlation of powder properties with dose delivery and implications for pharmacodynamic effect.
Concessio, NM; Hickey, AJ; Knowles, MR; VanOort, MM, 1999
)
0.3
" A proportionality between aerosol dispersion and pharmacodynamic effect was observed in preliminary in vivo evaluations, which demonstrates the potential of these techniques for correlation studies between in vitro powder properties and in vivo effect."( Pharmaceutical dry powder aerosols: correlation of powder properties with dose delivery and implications for pharmacodynamic effect.
Concessio, NM; Hickey, AJ; Knowles, MR; VanOort, MM, 1999
)
0.3
" The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by noncompartmental analysis and model-fitting."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cumulative single doses of inhaled salbutamol enantiomers in asthmatic subjects.
DeGraw, S; Gumbhir-Shah, K; Jusko, WJ; Kellerman, DJ; Koch, P, 1999
)
0.3
"To investigate the potential for systemic pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone propionate when repeat doses of the two drugs are given in combination to healthy subjects."( Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate given as a combination. Lack of systemic pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions.
Daniel, MJ; Falcoz, C; Kirby, S; Milleri, S; Squassante, L; Ventresca, GP; Ziviani, L,
)
0.13
" The systemic pharmacodynamic effects of inhaled salmeterol were not affected by the co-administration of fluticasone propionate."( Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate given as a combination. Lack of systemic pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions.
Daniel, MJ; Falcoz, C; Kirby, S; Milleri, S; Squassante, L; Ventresca, GP; Ziviani, L,
)
0.13
"These results in healthy subjects indicate that there is no systemic pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic interaction between inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone propionate when given in combination."( Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate given as a combination. Lack of systemic pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions.
Daniel, MJ; Falcoz, C; Kirby, S; Milleri, S; Squassante, L; Ventresca, GP; Ziviani, L,
)
0.13
" The pharmacokinetic parameters of each enantiomer were determined by noncompartmental and model-fitting analyses."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics and safety of inhaled albuterol enantiomers in healthy volunteers.
DeGraw, S; Gumbhir-Shah, K; Jusko, WJ; Kellerman, DJ; Koch, P, 1998
)
0.53
"To examine whether systemic beta2-adrenoceptor responses, such as tachycardia, tremor and hypokalaemia, can be used as a surrogate for the 20 min pharmacokinetic profile of inhaled salbutamol."( Pharmacokinetics and systemic beta2-adrenoceptor-mediated responses to inhaled salbutamol.
Fowler, SJ; Lipworth, BJ, 2001
)
0.31
"To compare the lung and systemic delivery of salbutamol following inhalation from a metered dose inhaler (MDI), a MDI attached to a spacer (MDI+SP) and a nebuliser (NEB) using a urinary pharmacokinetic method."( Relative lung and total systemic bioavailability following inhalation from a metered dose inhaler compared with a metered dose inhaler attached to a large volume plastic spacer and a jet nebuliser.
Chrystyn, H; Corlett, SA; Silkstone, VL, 2002
)
0.31
" The concentrations of salbutamol in plasma were assessed with non-compartment model to obtain the pharmacokinetic parameters."( Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of salbutamol metered-dose inhaler in healthy volunteers.
Du, XL; Fu, Q; Li, DK; Xu, WB; Zhu, Z, 2002
)
0.31
" Sensitivity was assessed in terms of magnitudes of ED(50), the estimated albuterol dose required to achieve 50 % of the fitted maximal value of the pharmacodynamic effect above baseline, and change in response as a function of dose, with emphasis on 1 and 2 actuations."( A methacholine challenge dose-response study for development of a pharmacodynamic bioequivalence methodology for albuterol metered- dose inhalers.
Adams, WP; Creticos, PS; Khattignavong, AP; Lewis, LD; Lietman, PS; Martinez, MN; Molzon, JA; Petty, BG; Singh, GJ; Williams, RL, 2002
)
0.76
" The concentrations of salbutamol in plasma were determined by HPLC, and then assessed with PCNONLIN software to obtain the pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability of aerosol versus water solution."( [Studies on the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of salbutamol aerosol in healthy volunteers].
Du, XL; Fu, Q; Li, DK; Xu, WB; Zhu, Z, 2001
)
0.31
" The pharmacokinetics of salbutamol aersol was described well with a two-compartment model, and the parameters for salbutamol inhaled and orally administered were assessed as follows: Tmax were (0."( [Studies on the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of salbutamol aerosol in healthy volunteers].
Du, XL; Fu, Q; Li, DK; Xu, WB; Zhu, Z, 2001
)
0.31
" The tablets coated to 3% and 4% levels exhibited the release rates within the range calculated from pharmacokinetic data."( Design of salbutamol EOP tablets from pharmacokinetics parameters.
Limsuwan, P; Mitrevej, A; Pongwai, S; Sinchaipanid, N, 2003
)
0.32
"Transdermal drug delivery formulation containing 5 mg/patch of salbutamol sulfate (SS), providing an input rate of 100 microg/h of SS was formulated and subjected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation in moderately asthmatic patients (n=6)."( Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of transdermal drug delivery systems of salbutamol sulfate.
Hiremath, SR; Narasimha Murthy, S, 2004
)
0.32
" The peak concentration was reached within 15-20 min."( The study of in vitro-in vivo correlation: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of albuterol dry powder inhalers.
Muanpanarai, D; Srichana, T; Suedee, R; Tanmanee, N, 2005
)
0.55
"This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study comparing the systemic pharmacodynamic effects (heart rate and serum potassium) and pharmacokinetics of salmeterol delivered by the non-CFC hydrofluoralkane (HFA) propellant 134a and the CFC propellant (propellant 11/12) metered dose inhalers (MDI) in healthy subjects."( Comparison of the systemic pharmacodynamic effects and pharmacokinetics of salmeterol delivered by CFC propellant and non-CFC propellant metered dose inhalers in healthy subjects.
Daley-Yates, P; De Silva, M; Handel, M; Kempsford, R; Mehta, R, 2005
)
0.33
" Separate population pharmacokinetic models were developed for (R)- and (S)-albuterol using the NOMNEM((R)) computer program."( Population pharmacokinetics of (R)-albuterol and (S)-albuterol in pediatric patients aged 4-11 years with asthma.
Baumgartner, RA; Grasela, T; Hsu, R; Maier, G; Rubino, C, 2007
)
0.85
" Therefore, this study investigated the pharmacokinetic characteristics of roflumilast and its pharmacodynamically active metabolite roflumilast N-oxide when co-administered with orally inhaled salbutamol in healthy subjects."( Roflumilast, a once-daily oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, lacks relevant pharmacokinetic interactions with inhaled salbutamol when co-administered in healthy subjects.
Bethke, TD; David, M; Giessmann, T; Hauns, B; Hauschke, D; Hermann, R; Lahu, G; Siegmund, W; Weinbrenner, A; Westphal, K; Zech, K, 2006
)
0.33
"There were no relevant pharmacokinetic interactions between roflumilast and salbutamol at therapeutically effective doses."( Roflumilast, a once-daily oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, lacks relevant pharmacokinetic interactions with inhaled salbutamol when co-administered in healthy subjects.
Bethke, TD; David, M; Giessmann, T; Hauns, B; Hauschke, D; Hermann, R; Lahu, G; Siegmund, W; Weinbrenner, A; Westphal, K; Zech, K, 2006
)
0.33
"24, Cmax (ng/ml) 172."( The investigation of the pharmacokinetics of pulsatile-release salbutamol sulfate with pH-sensitive ion exchange resin as the carriers in beagle dogs.
Guo, H; Liu, H; Pan, W; Sun, T; Yu, F; Zhao, X, 2007
)
0.34
"This study evaluated pharmacokinetic and glucodynamic responses to AIR inhaled insulin relative to subcutaneous insulin lispro, safety, pulmonary function, and effects of salbutamol coadministration."( AIR inhaled insulin versus subcutaneous insulin: pharmacokinetics, glucodynamics, and pulmonary function in asthma.
Berclaz, PY; de la Peña, A; Gates, JR; Muchmore, DB; Tibaldi, FS; Wolzt, M, 2008
)
0.35
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
"Because interpatient variability in bronchodilation from inhaled albuterol is large and clinically important, we characterized the albuterol dose/response relationship by pharmacodynamic modeling and quantified variability."( Population pharmacodynamic model of bronchodilator response to inhaled albuterol in children and adults with asthma.
Blake, K; Derendorf, H; Lima, J; Madabushi, R, 2008
)
0.82
"This study was designed to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), efficacy, and safety data for 2 DPIs delivering a combination of salmeterol 50 microg plus fluticasone propionate (FP) 250 microg (SFC 50/250) to investigate assumptions of bioequivalence."( Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, efficacy, and safety data from two randomized, double-blind studies in patients with asthma and an in vitro study comparing two dry-powder inhalers delivering a combination of salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone propiona
Daley-Yates, PT; Gillett, B; House, KW; Ortega, HG; Parkins, DA; Thomas, MJ, 2009
)
0.35
" The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained are explained in relation to the compound's metabolism by sulfotransferases."( Pharmacokinetic parameters and a theoretical study about metabolism of BR-AEA (a salbutamol derivative) in rabbit.
Correa-Basurto, J; Elizalde-Solis, O; Galicia-Luna, LA; Romero-Huerta, J; Soriano-Ursúa, MA; Trujillo-Ferrara, JG, 2010
)
0.36
"Airway absorption and bioavailability of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) may be influenced by differences in pharmacokinetic properties such as lipophilicity and patient characteristics such as lung function."( The bioavailability and airway clearance of the steroid component of budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone after inhaled administration in patients with COPD and healthy subjects: a randomized controlled trial.
Borgström, L; Dalby, C; Edsbäcker, S; Harrison, TW; Larsson, T; Polanowski, T, 2009
)
0.35
" In COPD patients, the Tmax and the mean residence time in the systemic circulation were shorter for budesonide versus fluticasone (15."( The bioavailability and airway clearance of the steroid component of budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone after inhaled administration in patients with COPD and healthy subjects: a randomized controlled trial.
Borgström, L; Dalby, C; Edsbäcker, S; Harrison, TW; Larsson, T; Polanowski, T, 2009
)
0.35
" In addition, the strengths and limitations of the PK approach to detect differences in product performance compared with in vitro and pharmacodynamic (PD)/clinical/therapeutic equivalence (TE) studies were discussed."( Role of pharmacokinetics in establishing bioequivalence for orally inhaled drug products: workshop summary report.
Adams, WP; Chen, ML; Daley-Yates, P; Davis, J; Derendorf, H; Ducharme, MP; Fuglsang, A; Herrle, M; Hochhaus, G; Holmes, SM; Lee, SL; Li, BV; Lyapustina, S; Newman, S; O'Connor, D; Oliver, M; Patterson, B; Peart, J; Poochikian, G; Roy, P; Shah, T; Sharp, SS; Singh, GJ, 2011
)
0.37
" Pharmacokinetic results showed a greater initial absorption of salmeterol with DPI-C but greater continued absorption and a 40% greater AUC with DPI-A, which we attribute to slower but more extensive oral absorption because of the greater mass of swallowed large particles of salmeterol generated by DPI-A."( Comparative pulmonary function and pharmacokinetics of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate delivered by two dry powder inhalers to patients with asthma.
Harrison, LI; Needham, MJ; Novak, CC; Ratner, P, 2011
)
0.37
" This method has been successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic study of compound ipratropium bromide aerosol mainly containing ipratropium bromide (IB) and salbutamol sulphate (SS) after inhalation in rats."( Simultaneous determination of ipratropium and salbutamol in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS and its application to a pharmacokinetic study.
Ding, C; Ge, Q; Li, Z; Wu, J; Zhi, X; Zhou, Z, 2011
)
0.37
"Prediction of pharmacokinetic (PK) profile for inhaled drugs in humans provides valuable information to aid toxicology safety assessment, evaluate the potential for systemic accumulation on multiple dosing and enable an estimate for the clinical plasma assay requirements."( A new methodology for predicting human pharmacokinetics for inhaled drugs from oratracheal pharmacokinetic data in rats.
Harrison, A; Jones, RM, 2012
)
0.38
"A sensitive and selective liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was developed and validated for the determination of salbutamol in human plasma and urine, and successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic study of salbutamol in Chinese healthy volunteers after inhalation of salbutamol sulfate aerosol."( Determination of salbutamol in human plasma and urine using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry and its pharmacokinetic study.
Chen, K; Guo, R; Liu, S; Liu, X; Teng, Y; Wang, B; Wei, C; Yuan, G; Zhang, D; Zhang, R, 2012
)
0.38
"We found no significant difference in pharmacokinetic profile of inhaled and oral salbutamol between elite athletes with asthma and nonasthmatic subjects."( The pharmacokinetic profile of inhaled and oral salbutamol in elite athletes with asthma and nonasthmatic subjects.
Backer, V; Dalhoff, K; Elers, J; Hemmersbach, P; Henninge, J; Pedersen, L, 2012
)
0.38
" No clinically relevant systemic pharmacodynamic effects were observed."( Pharmacodynamics of GSK961081, a bi-functional molecule, in patients with COPD.
Ambery, C; Bateman, ED; Kornmann, O; Norris, V, 2013
)
0.39
"The in vitro tests and systemic pharmacodynamic endpoints revealed no major differences between the two inhalers, but lacked predictive power and sensitivity to guide in vivo drug delivery performance and systemic exposure."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol delivered as a combination dry powder from a capsule-based inhaler and a multidose inhaler in asthma and COPD patients.
Chan, RH; Daley-Yates, PT; Despa, SX; Louey, MD; Mehta, R, 2014
)
0.4
" Twenty-five subjects with asthma were recruited and underwent SULT1A3 genotyping, from which four SNP homozygote (GG) subjects and nine wild-type (AA) subjects were selected to participated in the pharmacokinetic investigation."( SULT 1A3 single-nucleotide polymorphism and the single dose pharmacokinetics of inhaled salbutamol enantiomers: are some athletes at risk of higher urine levels?
Jacobson, GA; Walters, EH; Wood-Baker, R; Yee, KC, 2015
)
0.42
" However, studies on the pharmacokinetic profile of orally inhaled salbutamol doses used in clinical practice have not yet been reported in Chinese subjects."( Pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence of orally inhaled salbutamol in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Chen, J; Jiang, B; Jin, F; Lou, H; Ruan, Z; Shao, R; Shen, H, 2016
)
0.43
" Pharmacokinetic parameters, including AUC0-0."( Pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence of orally inhaled salbutamol in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Chen, J; Jiang, B; Jin, F; Lou, H; Ruan, Z; Shao, R; Shen, H, 2016
)
0.43
"The mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters of the reference drug were AUC0-0."( Pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence of orally inhaled salbutamol in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Chen, J; Jiang, B; Jin, F; Lou, H; Ruan, Z; Shao, R; Shen, H, 2016
)
0.43
"Fifteen children, ages 6-11 years, were included (PK, n = 13 for time to Cmax and terminal half-life of elimination; n = 12 for AUC and Cmax due to incomplete data)."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of albuterol multidose dry powder inhaler and albuterol hydrofluoroalkane in children with asthma.
Iverson, H; Ratnayake, A; Shore, P; Taveras, H, 2016
)
0.7
"Predicting local lung tissue pharmacodynamic (PD) responses of inhaled drugs is a longstanding challenge related to the lack of experimental techniques to determine local free drug concentrations."( Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling Accurately Predicts the Better Bronchodilatory Effect of Inhaled Versus Oral Salbutamol Dosage Forms.
Boger, E; Fridén, M, 2019
)
0.51
"Intravenous salbutamol is used to treat children with refractory status asthmaticus, however insufficient pharmacokinetic data are available to guide initial and subsequent dosing recommendations for its intravenous use."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Salbutamol in Children with Refractory Status Asthmaticus.
Boehmer, ALM; Boeschoten, SA; Buysse, CMP; de Hoog, M; de Wildt, SN; de Winter, BCM; Knibbe, CAJ; Koch, BCP; Koninckx, M; Plötz, FB; Vaessen-Verberne, AA; van der Nagel, BCH; Verhallen, JT; Vet, NJ, 2020
)
0.56
"Our aim was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile for intravenous salbutamol in children with status asthmaticus admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), and to use this model to study the effect of different dosing schemes with and without a loading dose."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Salbutamol in Children with Refractory Status Asthmaticus.
Boehmer, ALM; Boeschoten, SA; Buysse, CMP; de Hoog, M; de Wildt, SN; de Winter, BCM; Knibbe, CAJ; Koch, BCP; Koninckx, M; Plötz, FB; Vaessen-Verberne, AA; van der Nagel, BCH; Verhallen, JT; Vet, NJ, 2020
)
0.56
"The pharmacokinetic model of intravenous R- and S-salbutamol described the data well and showed that a loading dose should be considered in children."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Salbutamol in Children with Refractory Status Asthmaticus.
Boehmer, ALM; Boeschoten, SA; Buysse, CMP; de Hoog, M; de Wildt, SN; de Winter, BCM; Knibbe, CAJ; Koch, BCP; Koninckx, M; Plötz, FB; Vaessen-Verberne, AA; van der Nagel, BCH; Verhallen, JT; Vet, NJ, 2020
)
0.56
" The aim of this study is to assess the potential of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) as a matrix for pharmacokinetic analysis of inhaled and intravenous medication."( Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and inhaled salbutamol and tobramycin: An exploratory study to investigate the potential of exhaled breath condensate as a matrix for pharmacokinetic analysis.
Birkhoff, WAJ; Cholewinski, T; Cohen, AF; Dröge, MJ; Klarenbeek, NB; Kruizinga, MD; Nelemans, T; van Esdonk, MJ; Zuiker, RGJA, 2020
)
0.56
" Values for total clearance of compounds from plasma should be one of the most important pharmacokinetic parameters for predictions."( Predicted values for human total clearance of a variety of typical compounds with differently humanized-liver mouse plasma data.
Ito, S; Iwamoto, K; Kamimura, H; Mizunaga, M; Nakayama, K; Negoro, T; Nishiwaki, M; Nomura, Y; Suemizu, H; Yamazaki, H; Yoneda, N, 2020
)
0.56
"Human pharmacokinetic studies of lung-targeted drugs are typically limited to measurements of systemic plasma concentrations, which provide no direct information on lung target-site concentrations."( Lung pharmacokinetics of inhaled and systemic drugs: A clinical evaluation.
Badorrek, P; Ellinghusen, BD; Eriksson, UG; Faulenbach, C; Fridén, M; Hohlfeld, JM; Holz, O; Lundqvist, AJ; Müller, M; Sadiq, MW; Stomilovic, S, 2021
)
0.62
" Pharmacokinetic profiles were generated by combining data from multiple individuals, covering all sample timings."( Lung pharmacokinetics of inhaled and systemic drugs: A clinical evaluation.
Badorrek, P; Ellinghusen, BD; Eriksson, UG; Faulenbach, C; Fridén, M; Hohlfeld, JM; Holz, O; Lundqvist, AJ; Müller, M; Sadiq, MW; Stomilovic, S, 2021
)
0.62
"Combining pharmacokinetic data derived from several individuals and techniques sampling different lung compartments enabled generation of pharmacokinetic profiles for evaluation of lung targeting after inhaled and oral drug delivery."( Lung pharmacokinetics of inhaled and systemic drugs: A clinical evaluation.
Badorrek, P; Ellinghusen, BD; Eriksson, UG; Faulenbach, C; Fridén, M; Hohlfeld, JM; Holz, O; Lundqvist, AJ; Müller, M; Sadiq, MW; Stomilovic, S, 2021
)
0.62

Compound-Compound Interactions

The objective of this study was to determine whether a combination of nebulized albuterol and ipratropium with warmed humidified oxygen would be more beneficial when compared to the same combination at room temperature.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Effects of flutropium bromide, a new bronchodilator with an anticholinergic action, alone or in combination with other antiasthma drugs were investigated in guinea pigs by using an index of inhibition of the acetylcholine (ACh)-induced bronchoconstriction."( [Effects of flutropium bromide, a new anti-asthma drug, alone or in combination with salbutamol, aminophylline and disodium cromoglycate on the acetylcholine induced bronchoconstriction].
Misawa, M; Mizuno, H; Ohno, H; Takahashi, Y, 1990
)
0.28
" It is concluded that IPB alone is less effective than beta-adrenoceptor agonist, but its combination with SAS would be an effective and safe treatment in acute asthmatic attack."( [Effects of ipratropium bromide (IPB) and its combination with salbutamol sulfate (SAS) in acute asthmatic attack].
Chen, L; Deng, K; Ye, YQ, 1989
)
0.28
" In a single-blind study of 14 normal volunteers, we infused salbutamol in doses used in clinical practice and examined the effects of the addition of theophylline alone or combined with (-)-adrenaline on plasma potassium levels, heart rate and blood pressure."( Salbutamol induced hypokalaemia: the effect of theophylline alone and in combination with adrenaline.
Addis, GJ; Reid, C; Reid, JL; Whitesmith, R; Whyte, KF, 1988
)
0.27
" 12 patients received during a month salbutamol combined with nedocromil (Tilade 8 mg per day)."( [Bronchial hyperreactivity in patients with bronchial asthma treated with salbutamol and salbutamol combined with beclocort or nedocromil].
Krasnowska, M; Liebhart, E; Małolepszy, J, 1994
)
0.29
" This study shows that the additive bronchodilating effect of theophylline, when used in combination with salbutamol, 200 micrograms, and ipratropium, 40 micrograms, is significant but small in stable COPD."( Is oral theophylline effective in combination with both inhaled anticholinergic agent and inhaled beta 2-agonist in the treatment of stable COPD?
Ikeda, A; Izumi, T; Koyama, H; Nishimura, K, 1993
)
0.29
"The bronchodilator effect of the salbutamol alone and in combination with bromide of ipratropio is similar in intensity and in action time demonstrated by the VEF1."( [Degree and duration of bronchodilatation with an agonist beta 2 administered alone versus an agonist beta 2 administered with ipratropium bromide in children with acute asthma].
Bermejo Guevara, MA; del Río Navarro, BE; Reyes Ruiz, NI; Rosas Vargas, MA; Sienra Monge, JJ,
)
0.13
"The enantiomeric separation of a series of basic pharmaceuticals (beta-blockers, local anesthetics, sympathomimetics) has been investigated in nonaqueous capillary electrophoresis (NACE) systems using heptakis(2,3-di-O-methyl-6-O-sulfo)-beta-cyclodextrin (HDMS-beta-CD) in combination with potassium camphorsulfonate (camphorSO3-)."( Enantiomeric separation of basic compounds using heptakis(2,3-di-O-methyl-6-O-sulfo)-beta-cyclodextrin in combination with potassium camphorsulfonate in nonaqueous capillary electrophoresis: optimization by means of an experimental design.
Chiap, P; Crommen, J; Dewé, W; Fillet, M; Hubert, P; Servais, AC, 2004
)
0.32
"Salmeterol (S) and montelukast (M) individually inhibit the obstructive consequences of thermal stimuli such as exercise and hyperventilation (HV), but there is no information on whether these drugs can interact positively."( Bronchoprotective effects of single doses of salmeterol combined with montelukast in thermally induced bronchospasm.
Coreno, A; El-Ekiaby, A; McFadden, ER; Skowronski, M; West, E, 2005
)
0.33
" In a sample of children with acute asthma and initial mean PEF<50% predicted, LEV was associated with less tachycardia but had no other advantage over RAC combined with IB."( Comparison of levalbuterol and racemic albuterol combined with ipratropium bromide in acute pediatric asthma: a randomized controlled trial.
Cline, SM; Coakley, TA; Euwema, MS; Knecht, KR; Ralston, ME; Ziolkowski, TJ, 2005
)
0.67
" Whether inhaled corticosteroids by themselves or in combination with a long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonist repress systemic inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is unknown."( Can inhaled fluticasone alone or in combination with salmeterol reduce systemic inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [NCT00120978].
Cowie, RL; FitzGerald, M; Ford, G; Mainra, RR; Man, SF; Marciniuk, DD; Melenka, LS; Ramesh, W; Rousseau, R; Sin, DD; Wilde, E; Williams, D; Wong, E; York, E, 2006
)
0.33
"If inhaled corticosteroids by themselves or in combination with a long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonist could repress systemic inflammation, they might greatly improve clinical prognosis by reducing various complications in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease."( Can inhaled fluticasone alone or in combination with salmeterol reduce systemic inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [NCT00120978].
Cowie, RL; FitzGerald, M; Ford, G; Mainra, RR; Man, SF; Marciniuk, DD; Melenka, LS; Ramesh, W; Rousseau, R; Sin, DD; Wilde, E; Williams, D; Wong, E; York, E, 2006
)
0.33
"The objective of this study was to determine whether a combination of nebulized albuterol and ipratropium with warmed humidified oxygen would be more beneficial when compared to the same combination with humidified oxygen at room temperature."( Beneficial effects of warmed humidified oxygen combined with nebulized albuterol and ipratropium in pediatric patients with acute exacerbation of asthma in winter months.
Hassen, GW; Nibhanipudi, K; Smith, A, 2009
)
0.81
"Our study shows that warmed humidified oxygen given along with the combination of nebulized albuterol and ipratropium is more beneficial for pediatric patients having an acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma in the winter months when compared to nebulized albuterol alone with warmed humidified oxygen, nebulized albuterol alone with room temperature humidified oxygen, or a combination of nebulized albuterol and ipratropium with room temperature humidified oxygen."( Beneficial effects of warmed humidified oxygen combined with nebulized albuterol and ipratropium in pediatric patients with acute exacerbation of asthma in winter months.
Hassen, GW; Nibhanipudi, K; Smith, A, 2009
)
0.81
" We examined the effect of inhaled salmeterol, alone and in combination with fluticasone propionate, on the management of patients with COPD."( The effect of inhaled salmeterol, alone and in combination with fluticasone propionate, on management of COPD patients.
Boskabady, M; Boskabady, MH; Mansori, F; Nemat Khorasani, A, 2010
)
0.36
" Two LABAs (salmeterol and formoterol) are currently licensed for COPD both as monotherapy and in combination with ICS (fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide respectively)."( The use of long acting β₂-agonists, alone or in combination with inhaled corticosteroids, in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a risk-benefit analysis.
Cave, AC; Hurst, MM, 2011
)
0.37
" The GLISTEN trial compared the efficacy of two long-acting anti-muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), when combined with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a long-acting β2 agonist (LABA)."( Glycopyrronium once-daily significantly improves lung function and health status when combined with salmeterol/fluticasone in patients with COPD: the GLISTEN study, a randomised controlled trial.
Bremner, P; Chang, CL; Day, P; Frenzel, C; Frith, PA; Kurstjens, N; Ratnavadivel, R; Thompson, PJ, 2015
)
0.42
"This randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial in moderate/severe COPD patients compared once-daily glycopyrronium (GLY) 50 µg, once-daily tiotropium (TIO) 18 µg or placebo (PLA), when combined with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (SAL/FP) 50/500 µg twice daily."( Glycopyrronium once-daily significantly improves lung function and health status when combined with salmeterol/fluticasone in patients with COPD: the GLISTEN study, a randomised controlled trial.
Bremner, P; Chang, CL; Day, P; Frenzel, C; Frith, PA; Kurstjens, N; Ratnavadivel, R; Thompson, PJ, 2015
)
0.42
"To compare the efficacy of nebulised salbutamol alone and in combination with ipratropium bromide in acute severe asthma in children."( Response to nebulized salbutamol versus combination with ipratropium bromide in children with acute severe asthma.
Ahmed Khan, KM; Bai, C; Gowa, MA; Memon, BN; Parkash, A, 2016
)
0.43
"The effect of three amino acid coatings (L-leucine, L-valine and L-phenylalanine) on particle integrity, aerosolization properties, cellular interaction, cytocompatibility, and drug permeation properties of drug combination powder particles (beclomethasone dipropionate and salbutamol sulphate) for dry powder inhalation (DPI) was investigated."( Drug permeation and cellular interaction of amino acid-coated drug combination powders for pulmonary delivery.
Bimbo, LM; Hirvonen, J; Kauppinen, EI; Raula, J; Vartiainen, V, 2016
)
0.43
"Evaluation of the efficacy of nebulized magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) alone and in combination with salbutamol in acute asthma."( The efficacy of nebulized magnesium sulfate alone and in combination with salbutamol in acute asthma.
Ali, MA; El-Garhy, OH; Sarhan, HA; Youssef, NA, 2016
)
0.43
"Nebulized MgSO4 alone or combined with salbutamol has a clinically significant bronchodilator effect in acute asthma and leads to clinical improvement, increase in PEFR, reduction in HR, and reduction in RR."( The efficacy of nebulized magnesium sulfate alone and in combination with salbutamol in acute asthma.
Ali, MA; El-Garhy, OH; Sarhan, HA; Youssef, NA, 2016
)
0.43
"To evaluate and contrast the therapeutic effect and safety of fluticasone aerosol combined with theophylline tablets in patients with moderate to severe asthma, compared with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate aerosol."( Intervention Studies of Inhaled Corticosteroids Combined with Long-acting Theophylline or Long-acting β
Chen, P; Dai, A; Kong, L; Shang, S; Wang, Y, 2016
)
0.43
"After a screening period, patients meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to the experiment group (fluticasone aerosol combined with theophylline tablets) or the control group (salmeterol/fluticasone aerosol combined with placebo tablets) for 12 weeks of treatment."( Intervention Studies of Inhaled Corticosteroids Combined with Long-acting Theophylline or Long-acting β
Chen, P; Dai, A; Kong, L; Shang, S; Wang, Y, 2016
)
0.43
"There was no significant difference in therapeutic effect and safety between the 2 groups in treating patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma, which suggests that fluticasone aerosol combined with theophylline tablets is worth considering for use in primary hospitals or for low-income populations."( Intervention Studies of Inhaled Corticosteroids Combined with Long-acting Theophylline or Long-acting β
Chen, P; Dai, A; Kong, L; Shang, S; Wang, Y, 2016
)
0.43
"The aims of the study were to investigate the potential drug-drug interaction between salbutamol and ambroxol, the bioequivalence of the new fixed-dose combination containing salbutamol and ambroxol compared with co-administration of the two separate formulations, and to describe the safety and tolerability of the fixed-dose combination formulation in healthy Chinese volunteers."( Investigation of a potential drug-drug interaction between salbutamol and ambroxol and bioequivalence of a new fixed-dose combination containing these two drugs in healthy Chinese subjects.
Ding, L; Li, T; Liu, L; Lu, J; Shi, X; Wang, Y; Yang, W; Zhao, S, 2018
)
0.48
"An open-label, single-dose, four-treatment, four-period crossover study for evaluation of drug-drug interaction and bioequivalence (n = 24) was performed."( Investigation of a potential drug-drug interaction between salbutamol and ambroxol and bioequivalence of a new fixed-dose combination containing these two drugs in healthy Chinese subjects.
Ding, L; Li, T; Liu, L; Lu, J; Shi, X; Wang, Y; Yang, W; Zhao, S, 2018
)
0.48
"There were no significant drug-drug pharmacokinetic interactions between salbutamol and ambroxol after oral administration."( Investigation of a potential drug-drug interaction between salbutamol and ambroxol and bioequivalence of a new fixed-dose combination containing these two drugs in healthy Chinese subjects.
Ding, L; Li, T; Liu, L; Lu, J; Shi, X; Wang, Y; Yang, W; Zhao, S, 2018
)
0.48
"The primary purpose of this study was to identify the most common drug-drug interactions (DDI'S) in patients prescribed medications upon discharge from the emergency department."( Descriptive study of drug-drug interactions attributed to prescriptions written upon discharge from the emergency department.
Bridgeman, PJ; Jawaro, T; Mele, J; Wei, G, 2019
)
0.51
" The primary endpoint is the identification and characterization of drug-drug interactions caused by discharge prescriptions written by the treating physician."( Descriptive study of drug-drug interactions attributed to prescriptions written upon discharge from the emergency department.
Bridgeman, PJ; Jawaro, T; Mele, J; Wei, G, 2019
)
0.51
"The aim of this study was to investigate and discuss the salbutamol combined with budesonide in treatment of pediatric bronchial asthma (BA) and its effect on eosinophils (EOS)."( Salbutamol combined with budesonide in treatment of pediatric bronchial asthma and its effect on eosinophils.
Fan, C; Huang, X; Li, S; Mei, Q; Qian, D; Quan, J, 2021
)
0.62
" The children in control group were treated with budesonide and those in observation group were treated with salbutamol combined with budesonide."( Salbutamol combined with budesonide in treatment of pediatric bronchial asthma and its effect on eosinophils.
Fan, C; Huang, X; Li, S; Mei, Q; Qian, D; Quan, J, 2021
)
0.62
"The treatment of salbutamol combined with budesonide for pediatric BA has significant therapeutic effects; it can restore the pulmonary functions rapidly and improve the immunity of the lung, reduce the levels of eotaxin, ECP and EOS of the child patients and promote EOS apoptosis."( Salbutamol combined with budesonide in treatment of pediatric bronchial asthma and its effect on eosinophils.
Fan, C; Huang, X; Li, S; Mei, Q; Qian, D; Quan, J, 2021
)
0.62
" In an attempt to prevent PTB in singleton pregnancies, cervical cerclage, in combination with other treatments, has been advocated."( Cervical stitch (cerclage) in combination with other treatments for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies.
Eke, AC; Eleje, GU; Ezebialu, IU; Ikechebelu, JI; Ilika, CP; Okam, PC, 2020
)
0.56
" We included studies comparing cervical cerclage in combination with one, two or more interventions with cervical cerclage alone in singleton pregnancies."( Cervical stitch (cerclage) in combination with other treatments for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies.
Eke, AC; Eleje, GU; Ezebialu, IU; Ikechebelu, JI; Ilika, CP; Okam, PC, 2020
)
0.56
" One study (20 women), conducted in the UK, comparing cervical cerclage in combination with a tocolytic (salbutamol) with cervical cerclage alone in women with singleton pregnancy did not provide any useable data for this review."( Cervical stitch (cerclage) in combination with other treatments for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies.
Eke, AC; Eleje, GU; Ezebialu, IU; Ikechebelu, JI; Ilika, CP; Okam, PC, 2020
)
0.56
" We did not identify any studies looking at other treatments in combination with cervical cerclage."( Cervical stitch (cerclage) in combination with other treatments for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies.
Eke, AC; Eleje, GU; Ezebialu, IU; Ikechebelu, JI; Ilika, CP; Okam, PC, 2020
)
0.56

Bioavailability

The chemical modifications that make albuterol beta 2-selective also promote oral bioavailability and increased duration of action by decreasing sensitivity to degradative enzymes. A two-way-crossover bioavailability study was completed with 15 healthy male volunteers to evaluate the relative bioavailability of an orally administered controlled-release (CR) formulation of al buterol.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The bioavailability of po and it salbutamol was approximately 1 and 20%, respectively."( Salbutamol disposition and dynamics in conscious rabbits: influence of the route of administration and of the dose.
du Souich, P; Ong, H; Perreault, S, 1992
)
0.28
") relative bioavailability of 92."( Determination of the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung following inhalation.
Chrystyn, H; Hindle, M, 1992
)
0.28
"We compared in this double-blind crossover study the bioavailability of dextromethorphan from a dextromethorphan-salbutamol combination tablet (Redol comp) and from a plain dextromethorphan tablet (Extuson) by determining dextrorphan concentrations after single-dose oral administration in 10 healthy volunteers."( Pharmacokinetic comparison of a dextromethorphan-salbutamol combination tablet and a plain dextromethorphan tablet.
Happonen, P; Karttunen, P; Mykkänen, M; Romppanen, T; Silvasti, M; Tukiainen, H, 1990
)
0.28
" In these experiments, fenoterol and orciprenaline showed better bioavailability than salbutamol."( Determination of bioavailability on the basis of tachycardia after intravenous and oral administration of fenoterol, orciprenaline and salbutamol in non-anaesthetized rats.
Muacevic, G, 1985
)
0.27
" Relative bioavailability was assessed by comparing areas under the plasma-albuterol concentration time curves as well as peak concentrations and time to peak concentration."( Influence of food on the absorption of albuterol Repetabs.
Affrime, MB; Bolinger, AM; Gambertoglio, JG; Leung, P; Newth, CJ; Patrick, JE; Powell, M; Symchowicz, S; Young, KY; Zureikat, G, 1989
)
0.78
"A two-way-crossover bioavailability study was completed with 15 healthy male volunteers to evaluate the relative bioavailability of an orally administered controlled-release (CR) formulation of albuterol as compared to the immediate-release (IR) formulation of albuterol."( Relative bioavailability of a controlled-release albuterol formulation for twice-daily use.
Chubb, JM; Meyer, MC; Reese, ME; Sykes, RS,
)
0.58
" The absolute bioavailability of each of the oral preparations was 44%."( Pharmacokinetics and absolute bioavailability of salbutamol in healthy adult volunteers.
Goldstein, DA; Soldin, SJ; Tan, YK, 1987
)
0.27
"In a single dose cross-over experiment in twelve healthy adults a comparison of the absorption profiles and the relative bioavailability was made between a new salbutamol containing tablet (preparation A = Salbutax) and a commercially available and accepted formulation as reference (preparation B), both containing 4 mg salbutamol."( Single dose absorption profiles and bioavailability of two different salbutamol tablets.
Freie, HM; Grasmeijer, G; Jonkman, JH; van der Boon, WJ, 1986
)
0.27
" These results suggest a better bioavailability of Th, likely accounted for by a more advanced pharmaceutical technology."( Serum theophylline and ventilatory function in chronic obstructive lung disease. Comparison between two slow-release formulations of theophylline.
Cornelli, U; Grassi, V; Sorbini, CA; Tantucci, C; Verdecchia, P, 1985
)
0.27
" The bioavailability of two 4-mg tablet formulations, differing in their inactive excipients, and a syrup formulation, was evaluated."( Comparative bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of three formulations of albuterol.
Chung, M; Gural, R; Patrick, JE; Powell, ML; Radwanski, E; Symchowicz, SS; Weisberger, M, 1985
)
0.5
" The chemical modifications that make albuterol beta 2-selective also promote oral bioavailability and increased duration of action by decreasing sensitivity to degradative enzymes."( Albuterol: an adrenergic agent for use in the treatment of asthma pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and clinical use.
Ahrens, RC; Smith, GD,
)
1.85
" Given via the trachea, salbutamol bioavailability was decreased by hypoxia."( Influence of hypoxia and hypercapnia on the kinetics and hypokaliaemic effect of salbutamol in the rabbit.
Du Souich, P; Ong, H; Perreault, S; Saunier, C, 1995
)
0.29
" In dogs, Cmax was higher and reflected the greater oral bioavailability in this species."( Disposition of salmeterol xinafoate in laboratory animals and humans.
Barrow, A; Colthup, PV; Kulkarni, S; Maconochie, JG; Manchee, GR; Oxford, J; Palmer, E; Tarbit, MH,
)
0.13
"04), a relative oral bioavailability of 104%, indicating equivalent total salbutamol output, was also obtained in the human subjects."( Demonstration of bioequivalence between ventasol syrup and ventolin syrup in humans and in dogs.
Chang, C; Simon, OR, 1994
)
0.29
" From these samples the relative bioavailability to the lung (urinary salbutamol excretion 30 minutes after dosing) and the systemic bioavailability of the dose (24 hour urinary excretion of salbutamol and its metabolite) for each inhalation method was obtained."( Relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung following inhalation using metered dose inhalation methods and spacer devices.
Chrystyn, H; Hindle, M, 1994
)
0.29
" The nebuhaler and Bricanyl Spacer spacer devices were found to increase the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung compared with the MDI alone."( Relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung following inhalation using metered dose inhalation methods and spacer devices.
Chrystyn, H; Hindle, M, 1994
)
0.29
"Spacer devices improve pulmonary bioavailability of salbutamol and reduce the systemically available dose."( Relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung following inhalation using metered dose inhalation methods and spacer devices.
Chrystyn, H; Hindle, M, 1994
)
0.29
" Based on these observations, considerably higher bioavailability of (+)- than of (-)-albuterol may be anticipated after oral or inhaled doses of this drug."( Stereoselective sulfation of albuterol in humans. Biosynthesis of the sulfate conjugate by HEP G2 cells.
Schey, KL; Thornburg, KR; Walle, T; Walle, UK,
)
0.65
" Since IA salbutamol administration generated 100% bioavailability (F), AUCIA was used as a reference for comparison."( Hepatic and extrahepatic metabolism of salbutamol in anesthetized rabbits.
Adam, A; du Souich, P; Dumont, L; Ong, H; Perreault, S; Villiere, V,
)
0.13
"To understand the previous result of higher bioavailability of rectal salbutamol (SB) compared with oral SB, in situ experiments using rabbit duodenal and rectal loop were carried out."( [Absorption and first-pass-effect of salbutamol after intraduodenal and intrarectal administration in rabbits].
Ito, K; Kurosawa, N; Owada, E, 1993
)
0.29
"A simple non-invasive method, in which a urine sample is taken 30 minutes after drug administration, has previously been shown to be a measure of the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lungs."( Investigations of an optimal inhaler technique with the use of urinary salbutamol excretion as a measure of relative bioavailability to the lung.
Chrystyn, H; Hindle, M; Newton, DA, 1993
)
0.29
" Each inhaled 4 x 100 micrograms salbutamol in a series of experiments to examine the relative bioavailability to the lung after different respiratory manoeuvres."( Investigations of an optimal inhaler technique with the use of urinary salbutamol excretion as a measure of relative bioavailability to the lung.
Chrystyn, H; Hindle, M; Newton, DA, 1993
)
0.29
"There was significantly greater elimination of unchanged salbutamol 30 minutes after administration, indicating a greater relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lungs after (1) exhaling gently to residual volume rather than to functional residual capacity before inhalation; (2) slow inhalation (10 l/min) compared with fast inhalation (50 l/min); (3) breath holding for 10 seconds after inhalation compared with no breath holding."( Investigations of an optimal inhaler technique with the use of urinary salbutamol excretion as a measure of relative bioavailability to the lung.
Chrystyn, H; Hindle, M; Newton, DA, 1993
)
0.29
" The oral bioavailability of the beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist salbutamol has been proposed to be stereoselective, presumably due to presystemic sulphate conjugation."( Stereoselective sulphate conjugation of salbutamol in humans: comparison of hepatic, intestinal and platelet activity.
Pesola, GR; Walle, T; Walle, UK, 1993
)
0.29
"In order to obtain a basic knowledge for developing the rectal dosage form of salbutamol (SB), a comparison of the bioavailability was made between oral and rectal administrations."( [Comparison of bioavailability of salbutamol between oral and rectal administration in rabbits].
Ito, K; Kurosawa, N; Morishima, S; Owada, E, 1993
)
0.29
"The aim of this study was to determine whether significant differences exist in lung bioavailability between generic (Salamol, Salbulin) and innovator (Ventolin) formulations of inhaled salbutamol given by metered dose inhalers."( Lung bioavailability of generic and innovator salbutamol metered dose inhalers.
Clark, DJ; Clark, G; Gordon-Smith, J; Lipworth, BJ; McPhate, G, 1996
)
0.29
" Salbutamol, 1200 micrograms, was given with mouth rinsing and lung bioavailability was assessed by measuring plasma salbutamol levels and urine excretion of salbutamol."( Lung bioavailability of generic and innovator salbutamol metered dose inhalers.
Clark, DJ; Clark, G; Gordon-Smith, J; Lipworth, BJ; McPhate, G, 1996
)
0.29
" The most significant features of the enantioselective disposition of albuterol are the relatively rapid plasma clearance and low bioavailability of the eutomer."( Enantioselective disposition of albuterol in humans.
Boulton, DW; Fawcett, JP, 1996
)
0.81
"With the future advent of a world wide ban on chlorofluorocarbon containing aerosols, a study was designed to compare the in vivo lung bioavailability of salbutamol via chlorofluorocarbon-containing metered-dose inhaler (CFC), chlorofluorocarbon-free metered-dose inhaler (CFC-free), and dry powder inhaler (DPI)."( Lung bioavailability of chlorofluorocarbon free, dry powder and chlorofluorocarbon containing formulations of salbutamol.
Clark, DJ; Lipworth, BJ, 1996
)
0.29
" In summary, administration of albuterol with a MDI achieved a profile of serum levels in mechanically ventilated patients similar to that in healthy control subjects, but the peak serum level and systemic bioavailability (AUC0-30) were lower in the patients."( Serum albuterol levels in mechanically ventilated patients and healthy subjects after metered-dose inhaler administration.
Dhand, R; Duarte, AG; Fahey, PJ; Fink, JB; Jenne, JW; Reid, R; Tobin, MJ, 1996
)
1.06
" An in vivo study of lung bioavailability of salbutamol from a large volume (Volumatic) spacer was conducted."( Effect of multiple actuations, delayed inhalation and antistatic treatment on the lung bioavailability of salbutamol via a spacer device.
Clark, DJ; Lipworth, BJ, 1996
)
0.29
" Measurements of lung bioavailability were made at five, 10, and 20 minutes after inhalation to determine peak (Cmax) and average (Cav) plasma salbutamol levels."( Effect of multiple actuations, delayed inhalation and antistatic treatment on the lung bioavailability of salbutamol via a spacer device.
Clark, DJ; Lipworth, BJ, 1996
)
0.29
" Using urinary excretion, the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lungs and the body for a prototype DPI has been compared with an MDI."( Relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung following inhalation via a novel dry powder inhaler and a standard metered dose inhaler.
Chrystyn, H; Hindle, M; Parry-Billings, M; Peers, EM, 1997
)
0.3
" The amount of salbutamol and its metabolite, the ester sulphate conjugate, renally excreted up to 24 h post inhalation was also determined to evaluate the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the body."( Relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung following inhalation via a novel dry powder inhaler and a standard metered dose inhaler.
Chrystyn, H; Hindle, M; Parry-Billings, M; Peers, EM, 1997
)
0.3
"Fluticasone propionate, an inhaled corticosteroid with negligible systemic bioavailability via the oral route, is efficacious in the treatment of asthma when administered via metered-dose inhaler."( Comparative efficacy and safety of twice daily fluticasone propionate powder versus placebo in the treatment of moderate asthma.
Goldstein, MF; Hamedani, AG; Kellerman, DJ; Noonan, MJ; Pearlman, DS; Schaberg, A; Tashkin, DP, 1997
)
0.3
" It has a bioavailability of 50% and sulphation is the main route of its metabolism."( (-)-salbutamol sulphation in the human liver and duodenal mucosa: interindividual variability.
Giulianetti, B; Giuliani, L; Gomeni, R; Nervi, M; Pacifici, GM; Quilici, MC; Spisni, R, 1997
)
0.3
" The bioavailability of the eutomer was less than that of the distomer after administration of pure enantiomers and racemate."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single oral doses of albuterol and its enantiomers in humans.
Boulton, DW; Fawcett, JP, 1997
)
0.54
"A study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that airway calibre may alter lung deposition and therefore lung bioavailability of inhaled drugs as a result of narrowed airways reducing peripheral drug delivery."( Effects of airway calibre on lung delivery of nebulised salbutamol.
Clark, DJ; Lipworth, BJ, 1997
)
0.3
" The systemic effects of salbutamol are limited by its fairly high first-pass metabolism, but the oral bioavailability of salmeterol is unknown."( The contribution of the swallowed fraction of an inhaled dose of salmeterol to it systemic effects.
Bennett, JA; Harrison, TW; Tattersfield, AE, 1999
)
0.3
"For inhaled formulations of a drug substance, the balance between desired local activity and undesired systemic activity can be expressed with an L:T ratio, where L stands for the local bioavailability and T stands for the total systemic bioavailability."( Local versus total systemic bioavailability as a means to compare different inhaled formulations of the same substance.
Borgström, L, 1998
)
0.3
" The purpose of this study was to compare the pulmonary bioavailability of albuterol delivered by the nebulizer, the metered-dose inhaler (MDI) and spacer, and the right-angle MDI adaptor in ventilated patients using urinary analysis of drug levels."( A comparison of bronchodilator therapy delivered by nebulization and metered-dose inhaler in mechanically ventilated patients.
Hogan, J; Krikorian, J; Marik, P, 1999
)
0.53
" The pulmonary bioavailability was poor with the right-angle MDI port."( A comparison of bronchodilator therapy delivered by nebulization and metered-dose inhaler in mechanically ventilated patients.
Hogan, J; Krikorian, J; Marik, P, 1999
)
0.3
" The bioavailability of S-salbutamol was significantly higher than that of R-salbutamol after the different modes of administration."( Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of S-salbutamol after administration of the racemate in healthy volunteers.
Ahlner, J; Andersson, RG; Norlander, B; Rydberg, I; Schmekel, B; Sjöswärd, KN, 1999
)
0.3
" The principles of establishing bioequivalence on the basis of bioavailability and pharmacokinetics may not be applicable to inhaled medications with predominantly topical and minimal systemic effects."( Concepts of establishing clinical bioequivalence of chlorofluorocarbon and hydrofluoroalkane beta-agonists.
Parameswaran, K, 1999
)
0.3
" The different 30-min urinary excretions following inhalation of the two formulations suggest a link between the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung and the respirable dose, and that a slow inhalation rate should be used when using a Clickhaler."( The relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung using urinary excretion following inhalation from a novel dry powder inhaler: the effect of inhalation rate and formulation.
Chege, JK; Chrystyn, H, 2000
)
0.31
"The quantitative structure-bioavailability relationship of 232 structurally diverse drugs was studied to evaluate the feasibility of constructing a predictive model for the human oral bioavailability of prospective new medicinal agents."( QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
Topliss, JG; Yoshida, F, 2000
)
0.31
"The 30 min urinary salbutamol method can be used for an inhalation period of up to 8 min to identify the relative bioavailability to the lung."( Relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung following inhalation when administration is prolonged.
Chrystyn, H; Corlett, SA; Silkstone, VL; Tomlinson, HS, 2000
)
0.31
"Blood samples for plasma salbutamol concentrations were taken at 5 min, 10 min, and 20 min after inhalation, to measure lung bioavailability as a surrogate for relative lung dose."( Comparative in vivo lung delivery of hydrofluoroalkane-salbutamol formulation via metered-dose inhaler alone, with plastic spacer, or with cardboard tube.
Fowler, SJ; Griffiths, EA; Lipworth, BJ; Wilson, AM, 2001
)
0.31
" There were no differences in pharmacokinetics of (R)-albuterol when administered as (R)- or (RS)-albuterol at the 5-mg dose with equivalent relative bioavailability as seen from maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics and safety of inhaled albuterol enantiomers in healthy volunteers.
DeGraw, S; Gumbhir-Shah, K; Jusko, WJ; Kellerman, DJ; Koch, P, 1998
)
0.78
" This leads to a secretion-limited peroral absorption of salbutamol, which contributes to the poor oral bioavailability of the drug."( The influence of active secretion processes on intestinal absorption of salbutamol in the rat.
Casabó, VG; Martín-Villodre, A; Nácher, A; Valenzuela, B, 2001
)
0.31
"To study the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of salbutamol metered-dose inhaler (MDI) in healthy volunteers."( Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of salbutamol metered-dose inhaler in healthy volunteers.
Du, XL; Fu, Q; Li, DK; Xu, WB; Zhu, Z, 2002
)
0.31
" The relative bioavailability of MDI versus water solution was calculated."( Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of salbutamol metered-dose inhaler in healthy volunteers.
Du, XL; Fu, Q; Li, DK; Xu, WB; Zhu, Z, 2002
)
0.31
" The relative bioavailability of salbutamol MDI was 57 %+/-24 % compared with oral solution."( Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of salbutamol metered-dose inhaler in healthy volunteers.
Du, XL; Fu, Q; Li, DK; Xu, WB; Zhu, Z, 2002
)
0.31
"The 30 min urinary recovery of salbutamol, an index of the relative systemic bioavailability of salbutamol following inhalation, can be used to compare the lung deposition of nebulized systems."( Determination of the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lungs and systemic circulation following nebulization.
Chrystyn, H; Corlett, SA; Silkstone, VL, 2002
)
0.31
"02) correlation between the in vitro respirable dose and the amount of salbutamol excreted in the urine 30 min after the start of nebulization (relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung)."( An investigation of in vitro/in vivo correlations for salbutamol nebulized by eight systems.
Chrystyn, H; Dennis, JH; Pieron, CA; Silkstone, VL, 2002
)
0.31
" Blood samples were taken for plasma salbutamol at 5, 10, 15 and 20 min after inhalation to measure lung bioavailability as a surrogate for relative lung dose."( Effect of plastic spacer handling on salbutamol lung deposition in asthmatic children.
Anhøj, J; Bisgaard, H; Lee, DK; Lipworth, BJ, 2002
)
0.31
"To study the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of salbutamol aerosol in healthy volunteers."( [Studies on the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of salbutamol aerosol in healthy volunteers].
Du, XL; Fu, Q; Li, DK; Xu, WB; Zhu, Z, 2001
)
0.31
" The concentrations of salbutamol in plasma were determined by HPLC, and then assessed with PCNONLIN software to obtain the pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability of aerosol versus water solution."( [Studies on the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of salbutamol aerosol in healthy volunteers].
Du, XL; Fu, Q; Li, DK; Xu, WB; Zhu, Z, 2001
)
0.31
" The relative bioavailability of salbutamol aerosol was 57."( [Studies on the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of salbutamol aerosol in healthy volunteers].
Du, XL; Fu, Q; Li, DK; Xu, WB; Zhu, Z, 2001
)
0.31
"The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the bioavailability of three salbutamol sulfate suppository formulations."( Bioavailability assessment of salbutamol sulfate suppositories in human volunteers.
Al-Saidan, S; Kassem, AA; Khan, MA; Samy, AM; Taha, EI; Zaghloul, AA, 2004
)
0.32
" The observed intra-subject in health volunteers is similar to the reported intra-subject variability of bioavailability for a number of oral medications."( Intra-subject variability in lung dose in healthy volunteers using five conventional portable inhalers.
Aswania, O; Bhatt, J; Everard, ML; Iqbal, SM; Rigby, AS; Ritson, S, 2004
)
0.32
"The impact of intestinal conjugative metabolism on oral bioavailability was assessed by sequential and simultaneous analyses of the reported data in humans."( Differentiation of organ availability by sequential and simultaneous analyses: intestinal conjugative metabolism impacts on intestinal availability in humans.
Hayashi, M; Kawashima, K; Mizuma, T; Sakaguchi, S; Sakai, S, 2005
)
0.33
"The relative lung bioavailability of salbutamol sulfate particles produced using supercritical fluids (SEDS) and delivered by dry powder inhaler (DPI) was compared with the performance of a conventional micronized drug DPI using the same device design (Clickhaler, Innovata Biomed)."( Determination of the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lungs following inhalation from dry powder inhaler formulations containing drug substance manufactured by supercritical fluids and micronization.
Chrystyn, H; de Matas, M; Hosker, H; Mukherjee, R; Richardson, CH; Wong, I, 2007
)
0.34
"Twelve healthy volunteers and 11 mild asthmatic patients completed separate four-way randomised cross-over studies, assessing the relative bioavailability of salbutamol sulfate (urinary excretion method), formulated as SEDS particles (three batches) and micronized particles (Asmasal inhaler, UCB Pharma Ltd)."( Determination of the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lungs following inhalation from dry powder inhaler formulations containing drug substance manufactured by supercritical fluids and micronization.
Chrystyn, H; de Matas, M; Hosker, H; Mukherjee, R; Richardson, CH; Wong, I, 2007
)
0.34
"There was no significant difference in the relative lung bioavailability of salbutamol and its bronchodilator response between the best performing SEDS formulation and the Asmasal inhaler in volunteers and patients, respectively."( Determination of the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lungs following inhalation from dry powder inhaler formulations containing drug substance manufactured by supercritical fluids and micronization.
Chrystyn, H; de Matas, M; Hosker, H; Mukherjee, R; Richardson, CH; Wong, I, 2007
)
0.34
"Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) manufactured using supercritical fluids and delivered by DPI can provide similar lung bioavailability and clinical effect to the conventional micronized commercial product."( Determination of the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lungs following inhalation from dry powder inhaler formulations containing drug substance manufactured by supercritical fluids and micronization.
Chrystyn, H; de Matas, M; Hosker, H; Mukherjee, R; Richardson, CH; Wong, I, 2007
)
0.34
" In this regard, ANNs have been used to model historical data exploring the relative lung bioavailability of salbutamol from several different nebulizers."( Evaluation of an in vitro in vivo correlation for nebulizer delivery using artificial neural networks.
Chrystyn, H; de Matas, M; Shao, Q; Silkstone, VL, 2007
)
0.34
"The aim of these experiments was to investigate the use of artificial neural networks (ANNs) for generating models able to predict the relative lung bioavailability and clinical effect of salbutamol when delivered to healthy volunteers and asthmatic patients from dry powder inhalers (DPIs)."( Evaluation of in vitro in vivo correlations for dry powder inhaler delivery using artificial neural networks.
Chrystyn, H; de Matas, M; Richardson, CH; Shao, Q, 2008
)
0.35
"Although hepatic availability has been extensively studied to assess the oral bioavailability of drugs, intestinal availability has not, especially that related to conjugative metabolism (phase II metabolism)."( Assessment of presystemic and systemic intestinal availability of orally administered drugs using in vitro and in vivo data in humans: intestinal sulfation metabolism impacts presystemic availability much more than systemic availability of salbutamol, SUL
Mizuma, T, 2008
)
0.35
" The objective of this study was to make nano-salbutamol sulphate (SBS) DPI, radiolabel it with Tc-99m using a novel surface labeling methodology, characterize the formulation and assess its in vitro and in vivo deposition in healthy human volunteers to estimate its bioavailability in the target area."( Nano-salbutamol dry powder inhalation: a new approach for treating broncho-constrictive conditions.
Ahmad, FJ; Bhatnagar, A; Jain, GK; Khar, RK; Malhotra, G; Mittal, G, 2009
)
0.35
" Using a urinary pharmacokinetic method we have measured the relative lung and systemic bioavailability from urinary salbutamol excretion 30 min (USAL0."( Salbutamol relative lung and systemic bioavailability of large and small spacers.
Chrystyn, H; Mazhar, SH, 2008
)
0.35
" Furthermore, 29b was found to have low oral bioavailability in rat and dog and also to have long duration of action in an in vivo model of bronchodilation."( Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of long-acting beta2 adrenergic receptor agonists incorporating arylsulfonamide groups.
Barrett, VJ; Bevan, NJ; Biggadike, K; Butchers, PR; Coe, DM; Conroy, R; Edney, DD; Field, RN; Ford, AJ; Guntrip, SB; Looker, BE; McLay, IM; Monteith, MJ; Morrison, VS; Mutch, PJ; Procopiou, PA; Richards, SA; Sasse, R; Smith, CE, 2009
)
0.35
" The relative bioavailability to the lung of inhaled fluticasone and salmeterol combination is primarily dependent on respirable dose delivery and can be reliably quantified using adrenal suppression and early fall in serum potassium (marker of systemic beta-2 adrenoreceptor response) as surrogate markers for delivered lung dose."( A novel breath-actuated integrated vortex spacer device increases relative lung bioavailability of fluticasone/salmeterol in combination.
Clearie, K; Lipworth, BJ; McFarlane, L; Meldrum, K; Menzies, D; Nair, A, 2009
)
0.35
"To compare the in vivo relative bioavailability to the lung of Hydrofluoroalkane(HFA) Seretide delivered via Synchro-Breathe (SB); an optimally prepared 750 ml large volume plastic spacer, Volumatic (VM); and conventional Evohaler pMDI (EH)."( A novel breath-actuated integrated vortex spacer device increases relative lung bioavailability of fluticasone/salmeterol in combination.
Clearie, K; Lipworth, BJ; McFarlane, L; Meldrum, K; Menzies, D; Nair, A, 2009
)
0.35
"The breath-actuated Synchro-Breathe device was comparable to an optimally prepared Volumatic spacer, and resulted in commensurate improvement in relative lung bioavailability for both fluticasone and salmeterol moieties compared to pMDI."( A novel breath-actuated integrated vortex spacer device increases relative lung bioavailability of fluticasone/salmeterol in combination.
Clearie, K; Lipworth, BJ; McFarlane, L; Meldrum, K; Menzies, D; Nair, A, 2009
)
0.35
"Airway absorption and bioavailability of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) may be influenced by differences in pharmacokinetic properties such as lipophilicity and patient characteristics such as lung function."( The bioavailability and airway clearance of the steroid component of budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone after inhaled administration in patients with COPD and healthy subjects: a randomized controlled trial.
Borgström, L; Dalby, C; Edsbäcker, S; Harrison, TW; Larsson, T; Polanowski, T, 2009
)
0.35
"Oral bioavailability (F) is a product of fraction absorbed (Fa), fraction escaping gut-wall elimination (Fg), and fraction escaping hepatic elimination (Fh)."( Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
Chang, G; El-Kattan, A; Miller, HR; Obach, RS; Rotter, C; Steyn, SJ; Troutman, MD; Varma, MV, 2010
)
0.36
" The aim of this study was to investigate the relevance of this apical liquid film on the drug absorption rate when deposited as a dry powder formulation on pulmonary epithelial cells in vitro."( Drug transport across pulmonary epithelial cell monolayers: effects of particle size, apical liquid volume, and deposition technique.
Bur, M; Huwer, H; Lehr, CM; Muys, L, 2010
)
0.36
" Two separate randomized cross-over studies were performed to compare the systemic bioavailability of test vs."( Systemic bioavailability of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulations of fluticasone/salmeterol in healthy volunteers via pMDI alone and spacer.
Clearie, KL; Du Bois, J; Lipworth, BJ; Nell, H; Vaidyanathan, S; Williamson, PA, 2010
)
0.36
"This study compares the in vivo relative lung bioavailability of Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) Seretide delivered via unprimed and unwashed Aerochamber Plus (AP) or Volumatic (VM) spacers, a integrated breath-actuated vortex Synchro-Breathe (SB) device and an Evohaler pMDI (EH) device using adrenal suppression and early fall in serum potassium (K) as surrogates for respirable dose."( Comparative lung bioavailability of fluticasone/salmeterol via a breath-actuated spacer and conventional plastic spacers.
Burns, P; Lipworth, BJ; McKinlay, L; Nair, A; Short, P; Williamson, P, 2011
)
0.37
"The breath-actuated SB device was comparable to 'out of the box' small and large volume spacers and produced similar improvements in relative systemic lung bioavailability for fluticasone and salmeterol."( Comparative lung bioavailability of fluticasone/salmeterol via a breath-actuated spacer and conventional plastic spacers.
Burns, P; Lipworth, BJ; McKinlay, L; Nair, A; Short, P; Williamson, P, 2011
)
0.37
" It had lower oral absorption and bioavailability than salmeterol in both rat and dog."( The discovery of long-acting saligenin β₂ adrenergic receptor agonists incorporating a urea group.
Barrett, VJ; Ford, AJ; Looker, BE; Lunniss, GE; Needham, D; Procopiou, PA; Smith, CE; Somers, G, 2011
)
0.37
" Administering as a dry powder formulation slowed the rat lung absorption rate of the least soluble compound (fluticasone propionate), impacting the prediction of C(max) and MRT."( A new methodology for predicting human pharmacokinetics for inhaled drugs from oratracheal pharmacokinetic data in rats.
Harrison, A; Jones, RM, 2012
)
0.38
"The main objective of this study was to develop a novel aerosolized liposome formulation for pulmonary delivery of anti-asthmatic medication and to explore the relationship between the bioavailability and anti-asthmatic efficacy of such a formulation."( Liposomes prolong the therapeutic effect of anti-asthmatic medication via pulmonary delivery.
Chen, X; Huang, W; Wong, BC; Wong, YF; Xu, M; Yang, Z; Yin, L, 2012
)
0.38
"This study presents an application of the piecewise rational quadratic interpolant to the AUC calculation in the bioavailability study."( Application of the piecewise rational quadratic interpolant to the AUC calculation in the bioavailability study.
Ahmad, M; Akhter, KP; Javed, Z; Khan, SA; Murtaza, G; Muryam, B; Ramzan, M; Shafi, I,
)
0.13
" Using SBS as the model drug in this study, we developed SBS-loaded liposomes for oral administration and explored the relationship between their bioavailability and anti-asthmatic efficacy."( Effect of liposomes on the absorption of water-soluble active pharmaceutical ingredients via oral administration.
Bian, Z; Chen, H; Chen, X; Huang, W; Lu, A; Wong, BC; Xu, M; Yang, Z; Zhang, G; Zhao, Z, 2013
)
0.39
"This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, replicate treatment design comparative bioavailability study of SFC 50/250 delivered in a capsule-based inhaler (Rotahaler®) and a multidose dry powder inhaler (Diskus®)."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol delivered as a combination dry powder from a capsule-based inhaler and a multidose inhaler in asthma and COPD patients.
Chan, RH; Daley-Yates, PT; Despa, SX; Louey, MD; Mehta, R, 2014
)
0.4
" Data mining based on artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms were used to model in vitro inhalation process, predict and optimize bioavailability from inhaled doses delivered by metered dose inhaler (MDI) using different spacers in NIV."( In vitro/in vivo correlation and modeling of emitted dose and lung deposition of inhaled salbutamol from metered dose inhalers with different types of spacers in noninvasively ventilated patients.
Abdelrahim, MEA; Abdelrahman, MM; Hussein, RRS; M A Ali, A; Said, ASA; Salem, HF, 2017
)
0.46
"Salbutamol sulphate (SS) is a model short-acting β2-adrenergic receptor agonist used for the relief of bronchospasm having poor bioavailability (50%) due to its extensive first-pass effect."( Development of Salbutamol Sulphate Sublingual Films in Pullulan Matrix for Enhanced Bioavailability & Clinical Efficacy.
Kharshoom, RM; Sallam, NM; Sanad, RA; Zeneldin, MA, 2017
)
0.46
"FDSFs significantly improved the bioavailability of SS and resulted in dramatic improvement in its clinical efficacy."( Development of Salbutamol Sulphate Sublingual Films in Pullulan Matrix for Enhanced Bioavailability & Clinical Efficacy.
Kharshoom, RM; Sallam, NM; Sanad, RA; Zeneldin, MA, 2017
)
0.46
" Data mining technology based on artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms were used here to model in-vitro inhalation process and predict bioavailability from inhaled doses delivered by three different vibrating mesh nebulisers (VMNs) in NIV."( Modelling of in-vitro and in-vivo performance of aerosol emitted from different vibrating mesh nebulisers in non-invasive ventilation circuit.
Abdelrahim, ME; Abdelrahman, MM; Ali, AM; Rabea, H; Said, AS; Salah Eldin, R, 2017
)
0.46
" This trend did not extend to the 24-h levels, in which bioavailability with the large spacer plus pMDI (49."( Performance of Large Spacer Versus Nebulizer T-Piece in Single-Limb Noninvasive Ventilation.
Abdelrahim, ME; Elberry, AA; Fathy, M; Harb, HS; Rabea, H, 2018
)
0.48
" Adding a preliminary bronchodilator dose by pMDI prenebulization showed a trend toward greater pulmonary bioavailability of nebulized salbutamol and may be worth considering to maximize delivery of salbutamol to patients who are severely ill."( Performance of Large Spacer Versus Nebulizer T-Piece in Single-Limb Noninvasive Ventilation.
Abdelrahim, ME; Elberry, AA; Fathy, M; Harb, HS; Rabea, H, 2018
)
0.48
"The motive behind present work was to discover a solution for overcoming the problems allied with a deprived oral bioavailability of salbutamol sulfate (SS) due to its first pass hepatic metabolism, shorter half-life, and systemic toxicity at high doses."( Lung delivery of nanoliposomal salbutamol sulfate dry powder inhalation for facilitated asthma therapy.
Hajare, A; Honmane, S; More, H; Osmani, RAM; Salunkhe, S, 2019
)
0.51
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
" This study evaluated the relative lung and systemic bioavailability and oropharyngeal deposition of salbutamol post-inhalation from Ventolin® Evohaler® (GlaxoSmithKline) either alone following verbal inhaler technique counselling (VC) or connected to a newly improved Able Spacer® (AS)."( Comparative pharmacokinetics of salbutamol inhaled from a pressurized metered dose inhaler either alone or connected to a newly enhanced spacer design.
Ammari, WG; Oriquat, GA; Sanders, M, 2020
)
0.56
" The relative lung bioavailability (0-0."( Comparative pharmacokinetics of salbutamol inhaled from a pressurized metered dose inhaler either alone or connected to a newly enhanced spacer design.
Ammari, WG; Oriquat, GA; Sanders, M, 2020
)
0.56
" Thus, this study aimed to assess the relative lung deposition and systemic bioavailability and compare bronchodilator response of salbutamol delivered using different accessory devices attached to pMDIs."( Effect of different accessory devices on the dose delivered from pressurised metred-dose inhalers.
Abdelrahim, M; Hussein, RRS; Nicola, M; Soliman, YMA, 2021
)
0.62
"5)] and systemic bioavailability [0."( Effect of different accessory devices on the dose delivered from pressurised metred-dose inhalers.
Abdelrahim, M; Hussein, RRS; Nicola, M; Soliman, YMA, 2021
)
0.62
"61-fold enhancement in SB bioavailability from optimized formula (F13) compared to market tablet."( Superhydrophobic Surface for Enhancing the Bioavailability of Salbutamol Sulfate from Cross-Linked Microspheres: Formulation, Characterization, and in vivo Evaluation.
Abdoun, S; Alfuraihy, A; Alsubaiyel, A; Altasan, B; Gaber, D, 2021
)
0.62

Dosage Studied

Albuterol syrup over metaproterenol syrup in currently recommended doses. Study compared single daily versus twice daily dosing with a 24-hour theophylline, Uniphyl.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" In contrast to other broncholytic substances, a very small dosage of clenbuterol is sufficient to protect rats against the liberation of histamine and serotonin caused by the anaphylactic reaction."( [Profile of pharmacological actions of NAB 365 (clenbuterol), a novel broncholytic agent with selective activity on adrenergic beta2-receptors (author's transl)].
Engelhardt, G, 1976
)
0.26
"3 Dose-response curves to the four drugs for tracheal relaxation were almost parallel."( Assessment of the selectivity of OPC-2009, a new beta2-adrenoceptor stimulatn, by the use of the blood-perfused trachea in situ and of the isolated blood-perfused papillary muscle of the dog.
Himori, N; Taira, N, 1977
)
0.26
" The slopes of the salbutamol dose-response curves were flatter than those for isoprenaline and noradrenaline; the slopes of the procaterol dose-response curves were flatter than those for salbutamol."( Comparative study of chronotropic and inotropic responses to 5-(-hydroxy-2-isopropylaminobutyl)-8-hydroxycarbostyril hydrochloride hemihydrade (procaterol), salbutamol, noradrenaline and isoprenaline in the dog heart.
Chiba, S,
)
0.13
"The authors report two cases of severe non-obstructive cardiomyopathy presenting at the end of pregnancy in young women treated for long periods and at high dosage with beta 2-adrenoceptor stimulants, prescribed for threatened abortion or premature labour."( [Myocardiopathies during pregnancy. Possible role of beta-mimetics].
Bourdonnec, C; Daubert, JC; Gosse, P; Gouffault, J; Grall, JY; Pony, JC; Rio, M, 1978
)
0.26
" Increase of dosage did not lead to improved effectiveness."( [Parasympathicolytic drugs in treatment of obstructive lung diseases (author's transl)].
Gonsior, E; Meier-Sydow, J; Schultze-Werninghaus, G, 1979
)
0.26
" Specific airway conductance is measured after increasing doses of inhaled salbutamol and the extent to which the dose-response curve is displaced to the right after beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs is used to assess bronchial beta-adrenoceptor blockade."( Quantitative assessment of bronchial beta-adrenoceptor blockade in man.
Baldwin, CJ; Gribbin, HR; Tattersfield, AE, 1979
)
0.26
" The dose-response curves for the two agonists were parallel, but salbutamol was approximately 1/15 as potent as isoprenaline on a weight basis."( Profile of beta-adrenoceptors in femoral, superior mesenteric and renal vascular beds of dogs.
Taira, N; Yabuuchi, Y; Yamashita, S, 1977
)
0.26
" Construction of dose-response curves, however, revealed antagonism of all three parameters by propranolol and different sensitivities of the parameters to isoprenaline."( The beta-adrenoceptors responsible for a direct relaxation of the uncontracted nictitating membrane of the anaesthetized cat.
Broadley, KJ, 1977
)
0.26
"13 The vasoconstrictor actions of phenylephrine, noradrenaline and adrenaline were all antagonized by the systemic administration of phentolamine, all three dose-response curves being shifted to the right."( The role of beta-adrenoceptors in the responses of the hepatic arterial vascular bed of the dog to phenylephrine, isoprenaline, noradrenaline and adrenaline.
Richardson, PD; Withrington, PG, 1977
)
0.26
" Isoprenaline, salbutamol and ritodrine caused a dose-dependent reduction of the spontaneous contractions of the pregnant myometrium and a dose-related and parallel shift to the right of the isoprenaline dose-response curve was obtained with butoxamine but not with practolol."( Beta-adrenoceptors in the pregnant and non-pregnant myometrium of the goat and cow.
Larsen, JJ, 1979
)
0.26
"3 Propranolol caused a parallel shift to the right of the noradrenaline dose-response curve which was not changed by phentolamine."( alpha And beta-adrenoceptors in the detrusor muscle and bladder base of the pig and beta-adrenoceptors in the detrusor muscle of man.
Larsen, JJ, 1979
)
0.26
" Dose-response curves for acetylcholine with and without dopamine, isoprenaline, phenylephrine and noradrenaline were obtained."( The depressor effect of dopamine on the electrical and mechanical activities of cat small intestine.
Okawa, H; Wantanabe, M, 1975
)
0.25
" The shape of the salbutamol dose-response curve was not altered by aminophylline pre-treatment--it is therefore argued that the drugs are additive but not synergistic on the basis of this preliminary study."( Additive interaction of aminophylline and salbutamol in asthma: an in vivo study using dose-response curves.
Handslip, P; Leopold, D, 1979
)
0.26
" Salbutamol powder in a dose of 200 micrograms per capsule was able to control asthma as well as the aerosol, but some patients needed to increase the frequency of dosage when using the powder."( Long-term comparison of salbutamol powder with salbutamol aerosol in asthmatic out-patients.
Hartley, JP; Nogrady, SG; Seaton, A, 1979
)
0.26
" Adequate theophylline dosage is an effective bronchodilator."( Treatment of asthma in children.
Hobday, JD, 1978
)
0.26
" Administration of a standard premedication dosage to patients sedated for other reasons occasionally led to worsened respiratory status; pre-medication should be reduced or eliminated in sedated patients."( Bronchofiberscopy in the postoperative management of lung surgery patients.
Nakhosteen, JA, 1979
)
0.26
"Salbutamol in a powder aerosol from the Rotahaler insufflator was compared, with equal doses of the conventional pressurized aerosol by dose-response curves and in a 1 month open trial, in the treatment of asthma patients with good inhalation technique."( Comparison of salbutamol Rotahaler with conventional pressurized aerosol.
Clark, TJ; Hetzel, MR, 1977
)
0.26
" In the dosage used an increase in maternal and fetal heart rate was observed, more frequently in the patients receiving salbutamol compared with those receiving terbutaline."( The effect of salbutamol and terbutaline in the management of premature labour.
Rydén, G, 1977
)
0.26
" Salbutamol was given as an infusion in the same dosage as is used to inhibit uterine contractions in cases of premature labor and in obstetric emergencies."( The immediate effect of a beta-adrenergic agonist (salbutamol) on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism during the third trimester of pregnancy.
Joelsson, I; Larsson, A; Lunell, NO; Persson, B, 1977
)
0.26
" Reproduceable responses sufficient for calculating dose-response curves, could be obtained up to 30 h after death."( Physiological and pharmacological studies on isolated human bronchial preparations.
Berlin, E; Boe, J; Thulesius, O, 1978
)
0.26
"In human adipose tissue in vitro, dose-response curves were followed for different adrenomimetics releasing free fatty acids and glycerol into an albumin-containing medium."( Some adrenomimetic drugs affecting lipolysis in human adipose tissue in vitro.
Kuhn, E; Wenke, M; Wenkeová, J, 1976
)
0.26
" Drug dosage was one 4-mg tablet, of two inhalations of 100 mug of salbutamol aerosol or a combination of both, four times daily."( The efficacy, as modified by the circadian rhythm of salbutamol administered by different routes.
Alanko, K; Lahdensuo, A, 1976
)
0.26
"1 Dose-response curves for the positive inotropic and chronotropic responses to isoprenaline were obtained in atria from untreated guinea-pigs and those receiving various reserpine pretreatments."( Selective reserpine-induced supersensitivity of the positive inotropic and chronotropic responses to isoprenaline and salbutamol in guinea-pig isolated atria.
Broadley, KJ; Lumley, P, 1977
)
0.26
" Cumulative dose-response curves for the positive inotropic and chronotropic responses of isolated guinea-pig atria to isoprenaline and the partial agonist salbutamol were plotted as a percentage of the maximum response to isoprenaline."( The influence of temperature upon reserpine-induced supersensitivity of guinea-pig isolated atria to isoprenaline and salbutamol.
Broadley, KJ; Duncan, C, 1977
)
0.26
"Cumulative dose-response curves for orally administered fenoterol and salbutamol concerning effects of FEV1, heart rate, blood pressure and tremor were constructed."( Cumulative dose-response curves for comparison of oral bronchodilating drugs. A study of salbutamol and fenoterol.
Larsson, S; Svedmyr, N, 1977
)
0.26
" Cumulative dose-response curves for both routes of administration concerning 1-sec forced expiratory volume, forced vital capacity, heart rate, blood pressure, and tremor were constructed."( Bronchodilating effect and side effects of beta2- adrenoceptor stimulants by different modes of administration (tablets, metered aerosol, and combinations thereof). A study with salbutamol in asthmatics.
Larsson, S; Svedmyr, N, 1977
)
0.26
" In this dosage it was found that the peak effect of the two drugs was the same but that the effect of rimiterol was less prolonged than that of sulbutamol."( Comparison between the bronchodilator and cardiovascular effects of inhaling 0.5 mg. rimiterol ('Pulmadil') and 0.2 mg. salbutamol.
Bianco, S; Kamburoff, PL; Prime, FJ, 1975
)
0.25
" In the present study, log dose-response lines were obtained for dl-isoprenaline (ISO), l-adrenaline (ADR) l-noradrenaline (NOR), salbutamol (SALB), and orciprenaline on isolated tracheal chains prepared from both the laryngeal (L) and bronchial (B) ends of the trachea."( The effect of cocaine on the responses of the differently innervated laryngeal and bronchial ends of the guinea pig trachea in vitro to clinically used bronchodilators.
Hamilton, JT; Jones, TR; Lefcoe, NM, 1975
)
0.25
" Given orally, RP 58802B (5 mg/kg, 60 min before challenge) produced a greater than three-fold shift to the right of the dose-response curve and depressed the maximum response to histamine by 39 +/- 11%."( RP 58802B, a long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist: assessment of antiasthma activity in the guinea-pig in vivo.
Lewis, SA; Raeburn, D; Underwood, SL, 1992
)
0.28
" The dose-response curves for change in PC20 indicated that the higher doses of the nebulizer solution delivered more drug to beta 2 receptors in the lung than the lower doses from the MDI."( Relative amount of albuterol delivered to lung receptors from a metered-dose inhaler and nebulizer solution. Bioassay by histamine bronchoprovocation.
Blake, KV; Harman, E; Hendeles, L; Hoppe, M, 1992
)
0.61
" Bronchial lability was characterized by (1) variability in mean daily peak expiratory flow rate and (2) bronchial responsiveness to either carbachol (as assessed by the threshold dose and the slope of the dose-response curve) or salbutamol (as assessed by the threshold dose and maximal response)."( Relationship between spontaneous dyspnoea and lability of airway obstruction in asthma.
Lockhart, A; Marsac, J; Peiffer, C; Razzouk, H; Toumi, M, 1992
)
0.28
" All changes were dosed related."( Dose-response study with high-dose inhaled salmeterol in healthy subjects.
Forster, JK; Maconochie, JG, 1992
)
0.28
" Dose-response curves show similar sensitivity, but decreased responsiveness in the lean animal."( Food intake of lean and obese Zucker rats following ventricular infusions of adrenergic agonists.
Bray, GA; Tsujii, S, 1992
)
0.28
" Before salmeterol treatment was initiated and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of salmeterol treatment, a cumulative dose-response curve to inhaled salbutamol (100, 300 and 900 micrograms) was performed, and FEV1 measured."( Twelve months, treatment with inhaled salmeterol in asthmatic patients. Effects on beta 2-receptor function and inflammatory cells.
Lötvall, J; Lunde, H; Svedmyr, N; Törnqvist, H; Ullman, A, 1992
)
0.28
" Microcapsules were compressed into tablets to get a controlled release oral dosage form."( Release kinetics of salbutamol sulphate from wax coated microcapsules and tableted microcapsules.
Jayaswal, SB; Raghuvanshi, RS; Singh, J; Tripathi, KP,
)
0.13
"To study the dose-response relationship of salmeterol for protection against a naturally occurring stimulus, isocapnic hyperventilation tests of cold air were done in 16 asthmatic patients."( Salmeterol protects against hyperventilation-induced bronchoconstriction over 12 hours.
Jörres, R; Lüthke, M; Magnussen, H; Nowak, D; Rabe, KF; Wiessmann, J, 1992
)
0.28
" Such patients may require theophylline dosage adjustment as a result of this interaction."( Enhancement of theophylline clearance by oral albuterol.
Amitai, Y; Glustein, J; Godfrey, S, 1992
)
0.54
" After each period, dose-response curves were measured on 4 study days with doubling doses of salbutamol, ipratropium, a combination of salbutamol and ipratropium, and placebo until a plateau in FEV1 was reached."( Separate and combined effects of corticosteroids and bronchodilators on airflow obstruction and airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma.
Alting-Hebing, D; Breederveld, N; Koëter, GH; Postma, DS; van der Mark, TW; Wempe, JB, 1992
)
0.28
" dosage regimen."( Evaluation of procaterol and albuterol (salbutamol) aerosol in the treatment of asthma.
Mazza, JA; Reed, CE; Tashkin, DP, 1992
)
0.57
" On the other day, the patients received sustained-release theophylline, 200 mg twice a day, or in a dosage taken previously to achieve a serum theophylline level of 55 to 110 mumol/L."( The effects of inhaled albuterol and oral theophylline on gastroesophageal reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and obstructive lung disease.
Austin, J; Rohwedder, JJ; Ruzkowski, CJ; Sanowski, RA; Waring, JP, 1992
)
0.59
"Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), isotachophoresis (ITP) and capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) were applied to the determination of salbutamol, terbutaline sulphate and fenoterol hydrobromide in commercially available pharmaceutical dosage forms."( Comparison of isotachophoresis, capillary zone electrophoresis and high-performance liquid chromatography for the determination of salbutamol, terbutaline sulphate and fenoterol hydrobromide in pharmaceutical dosage forms.
Ackermans, MT; Beckers, JL; Everaerts, FM; Seelen, IG, 1992
)
0.28
"We used a placebo-controlled standardized protocol to define the dose-response relationship to the beta-adrenergic bronchodilator salbutamol (albuterol) in 10 ventilator-dependent premature infants at a postnatal age of 13."( Dose-related bronchodilator response to aerosolized salbutamol (albuterol) in ventilator-dependent premature infants.
Dehan, M; Denjean, A; Gaultier, C; Guimaraes, H; Migdal, M; Miramand, JL, 1992
)
0.72
" Thirty minutes later a beta 2-agonist dose-response curve was performed by inhaling salbutamol in cumulative doses of 200, 400 and 800 micrograms."( Bronchodilator properties of an inhaled leukotriene D4 antagonist (verlukast--MK-0679) in asthmatic patients.
Buntinx, A; De Lepeleire, I; Decramer, M; Friedman, B; Lammers, JW; Van Daele, P; Van den Elshout, FM, 1992
)
0.28
" Regression analysis also showed no evidence of a dose-response relationship for Ros."( Measurement of normal human airways response to beta-adrenoceptor stimulation using a forced oscillation technique.
Clark, RA; Lipworth, BJ; McDevitt, DG, 1991
)
0.28
" Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) dose-response curves for inhaled salbutamol were repeatedly recorded during the study, and no tachyphylaxis was found."( Inhaled formoterol during one year in asthma: a comparison with salbutamol.
Arvidsson, P; Larsson, S; Löfdahl, CG; Melander, B; Svedmyr, N; Wåhlander, L, 1991
)
0.28
" During the high dosing the secretion rate of parotid saliva decreased and the concentrations of its total protein, amylase, hexosamine and the ratio of hexosamine/total protein were lowered."( Saliva composition in asthmatic patients after treatment with two dose levels of a beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist.
Ericson, T; Möller, C; Ryberg, M, 1990
)
0.28
" The initially used intravenous dosage (0."( [The treatment of hyperkalemia with salbutamol].
Muñoz, R; Velásquez, L, 1991
)
0.28
" The following observations were made: four patients had sinus tachycardia and another suffered from ventricular extrasystoles as seen in the electrocardiographic register; another two patients had sinus tachycardia when the bronchial dilator dosage was doubled."( [Electrocardiographic changes with the use of aminophylline and salbutamol in adult patients with chronic bronchial asthma].
Esquer Flores, J; Gálvez Gudiño, VJ; Orea Solano, M,
)
0.13
" A need therefore exists for a pediatric salbutamol dosage form, which not only controls asthma but is also convenient and acceptable to use."( Pharmacokinetic characteristics of a novel controlled-release sprinkle formulation of salbutamol.
Devane, J; Martin, M; Mulligan, S, 1991
)
0.28
" Dose-response curves were obtained for the inotropic, chronotropic and pressor responses to cumulative infusions of noradrenaline (n = 6) and dobutamine (n = 6)."( The effects of neuropeptide Y on myocardial contractility and coronary blood flow.
Awad, SJ; Einstein, R; Potter, EK; Richardson, DP, 1991
)
0.28
" These findings imply therapeutic advantages of albuterol syrup over metaproterenol syrup in currently recommended doses with respect to improvement in pulmonary function, chronotropic effects, and frequency of dosing required to maintain optimum bronchodilation over a 24-hour period."( Comparison of albuterol and metaproterenol syrup in the treatment of childhood asthma.
Ratner, PH; Shapiro, GG; Wolfe, JD, 1991
)
0.9
" To determine whether these drugs also protect against excessive airway narrowing, the effect of inhaled salbutamol on the position and shape of the dose-response curves for histamine or methacholine was investigated in 12 patients with asthma and 11 with chronic obstructive lung disease."( The protective effect of a beta 2 agonist against excessive airway narrowing in response to bronchoconstrictor stimuli in asthma and chronic obstructive lung disease.
Bel, EH; Dijkman, JH; Sterk, PJ; Timmers, MC; Zwinderman, AH, 1991
)
0.28
"5 x 10(-7) M) and matched placebo were administered by identical metered dose inhaler 15 min before a dose-response to sodium metabisulphite (1."( Salbutamol inhibits metabisulphite-induced bronchoconstriction.
Dixon, CM; Ind, PW; Iredale, MJ, 1991
)
0.28
" Dose-response curves were measured after three weeks of treatment with ipratropium bromide and again after a three-week course of inhaled salbutamol."( Tolerance to beta 2-agonists in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Anthonisen, NR; Georgopoulos, D; Wong, D, 1990
)
0.28
" One subject developed moderate drowsiness during multiple dosing with cetirizine."( Effects of oral cetirizine, a selective H1 antagonist, on allergen- and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in subjects with asthma.
Dauphinee, B; Djahed, B; Gong, H; Tashkin, DP; Wu, TC, 1990
)
0.28
" Dose-response curves to inhaled SB were obtained the day before and the day after each treatment period."( Inhaled salmeterol and salbutamol in asthmatic patients. An evaluation of asthma symptoms and the possible development of tachyphylaxis.
Hedner, J; Svedmyr, N; Ullman, A, 1990
)
0.28
" The dose of hyperventilation of cold air causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20) was interpolated on the dose-response curve."( Formoterol, a new inhaled beta-2 adrenergic agonist, has a longer blocking effect than albuterol on hyperventilation-induced bronchoconstriction.
Cartier, A; Ghezzo, H; Gontovnick, L; Malo, JL; Trudeau, C, 1990
)
0.5
" The dose-response curves for these agonists were shifted slightly to the right when the amplitude of the twitch was increased up to twice its original size."( Dissociation constants and relative efficacies estimated from the functional antagonism of beta-adrenoceptor agonists on transmural stimulation in rat vas deferens.
Diaz-Toledo, A; Jurkiewicz, A, 1990
)
0.28
" Results were determined for both daytime and nighttime dosing intervals."( Albuterol extended-release products: a comparison of steady-state pharmacokinetics.
Donn, KH; Hussey, EK; Powell, JR, 1991
)
1.72
" Although cromolyn sodium significantly decreased the severity of antigen-induced bronchoconstriction, it did not affect T-cell subset composition changes at the dosage used."( Antigen-induced T-cell changes: modulation by pharmacologic agents.
Gerblich, A; Salik, H; Schuyler, M; Varghese, J, 1990
)
0.28
" The drug dosage was controlled by limiting the inspired volumes of gas (single and cumulative) to the pretested inspiratory capacity."( Single breath versus panting technique in salbutamol delivery through a 750 mL spacing device.
James, RW; Masters, IB, 1990
)
0.28
"Cardioselectivity of a single oral dose of metoprolol oral osmotic (OROS) (14/190 mg) and atenolol (100 mg) was compared in 12 patients with reversible obstructive airway disease by assessing the dose-response curve to increasing doses of inhaled salbutamol."( Comparative evaluation of cardioselectivity of metoprolol OROS and atenolol: a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study.
Bruni, B; Dottorini, ML; Grassi, V; Lecaillon, JB; Motolese, M; Peccini, F; Sorbini, CA; Tantucci, C, 1990
)
0.28
" In phase 1, maximal bronchodilation was determined by dose-response studies on separate days."( Efficacy of atropine methylnitrate alone and in combination with albuterol in children with asthma.
Hill, MR; Nelson, HS; Sladek, WA; Sur, S; Szefler, SJ; Vichyanond, P, 1990
)
0.52
"The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficacy and systemic effects of 4 mg and 8 mg doses of salbutamol controlled release (SCR) after single dosing and at steady state in patients with asthma."( Comparison of the efficacy and systemic effects of 4 mg and 8 mg formulations of salbutamol controlled release in patients with asthma.
Clark, RA; Dhillon, DP; Lipworth, BJ; McDevitt, DG; Palmer, JB, 1990
)
0.28
" Salbutamol did not influence the caffeine dose-response curves in any of the groups (n = 14 in the MH-non-susceptible (MHN) group)."( Influence of salbutamol on the in vitro muscle response to caffeine and halothane in malignant hyperthermia.
Bendixen, D; Ording, H, 1990
)
0.28
" The beta-antagonist effects of the three substances were also studied, by running a dose-response curve to noradrenaline or adrenaline as appropriate following the addition of the substance of interest."( Effects of dilevalol on human atrial muscle.
Brown, MJ; Sanders, L, 1990
)
0.28
" In vivo X-ray studies of the abdomen were carried out to locate the floating and non-floating (fabricated) dosage forms at various time intervals of uniform duration."( In vitro and in vivo studies of sustained-release floating dosage forms containing salbutamol sulfate.
Babu, VB; Khar, RK, 1990
)
0.28
" We determined the inhaled adenosine dose-response curves after no treatment and after treatment with aminophylline (240 mg in 10 min), reproterol (90 mcg in 2 min) and salbutamol (100 mcg in 2 min) administered intravenously 15 min before adenosine and reproterol (500 mcg) and salbutamol (200 mcg) administered by inhalation from a metered aerosol 30 min before adenosine on separate days."( Role of purinergic system in tracheobronchial reactivity of healthy and bronchopathic subjects.
Carapella, N; Filippelli, A; Loffreda, A; Marmo, E; Matera, MG; Montanaro, C; Santagata, A; Servodio, R; Susanna, V, 1990
)
0.28
" However, the dose-response curves of salbutamol on the venous and arterial systems overlapped, indicating that the increase in venous return represents a combination of properties common to both beta 1 and beta 2 adrenoceptors."( Dopamine and norepinephrine increase venous return by stimulating alpha and beta adrenoceptors in the dog.
Banning, JW; Morgan, JP; Roebel, LE; Van Maanen, EF, 1988
)
0.27
"05) greater at all dosage levels with the Turret."( Delivery of albuterol and ipratropium bromide from two nebulizer systems in chronic stable asthma. Efficacy and pulmonary deposition.
Bloom, R; Clarke, SW; Johnson, MA; Newman, SP; Talaee, N, 1989
)
0.66
" On the day salbutamol was given, surface area under the dose-response curve to PGF2 alpha was significantly higher and the final drop of FEV1 significantly lower than those observed on days when placebo, ipratropium bromide and cromolyn sodium were given."( Effect of salbutamol, ipratropium bromide and cromolyn sodium on prostaglandin F2 alpha-induced bronchospasm.
Georgopoulos, D; Giulekas, D; Ilonidis, G; Sichletidis, L, 1989
)
0.28
"In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study consisting of two 1-month periods with a 2-week 'run-in' we compared the effects of a combination of fenoterol with ipratropium bromide (Duovent, Boehringer Ingelheim) and salbutamol administered by standard metered dose inhalers in conventional dosage in young adults with nocturnal asthma."( Comparison of a combination of fenoterol with ipratropium bromide (Duovent) and salbutamol in young adults with nocturnal asthma.
Shettar, SP; Wolstenholme, RJ, 1989
)
0.28
" Dose-response curves were made for the beta 2-sympathicomimetic salbutamol."( In vivo beta 2-adrenoceptor hyporesponsiveness in the cardiovascular system of the pig after Bordetella pertussis.
De Wildt, DJ; Nijkamp, FP; Schoute, E; Van Heuven-Nolsen, D; Verdouw, PD, 1989
)
0.28
" In contrast to airways effects, systemic beta-adrenoceptor responses did not occur until 500 micrograms, and a ceiling in the dose-response curve was not reached."( Beta-adrenoceptor responses to inhaled salbutamol in normal subjects.
Lipworth, BJ; McDevitt, DG, 1989
)
0.28
" Comparison of dose-response curves for MDI alone and with PSS showed no significant differences, for any of the variables measured."( Systemic beta-adrenoceptor responses to salbutamol given by metered-dose inhaler alone and with pear shaped spacer attachment: comparison of electrocardiographic, hypokalaemic and haemodynamic effects.
Lipworth, BJ; McDevitt, DG; Struthers, AD, 1989
)
0.28
" Comparison with dose-response curves in a group of young (Y) subjects (24 +/- 3 years) given an identical dose protocol of salbutamol showed no evidence of subsensitivity of beta 2-adrenoceptor responses in the elderly (E) group (mean and 95% confidence intervals for maximum responses): delta K -0."( Beta-adrenoceptor responses to inhaled salbutamol in the elderly.
Lipworth, BJ; McDevitt, DG; Tregaskis, BF, 1989
)
0.28
" Three hours after drug ingestion, dose-response curves were constructed using cumulative doses of inhaled salbutamol: 200 micrograms, 700 micrograms, 1700 micrograms, 3200 micrograms, 6200 micrograms."( Assessment of airways, tremor and chronotropic responses to inhaled salbutamol in the quantification of beta 2-adrenoceptor blockade.
Brown, RA; Lipworth, BJ; McDevitt, DG, 1989
)
0.28
"Patients with severe chronic airways obstruction often respond poorly to inhaled salbutamol in conventional dosage from a pressurized aerosol."( High dose salbutamol in chronic airflow obstruction: comparison of nebulizer with Rotacaps.
Assoufi, BK; Hodson, ME, 1989
)
0.28
" The concentration-time profiles at steady-state showed little fluctuation in plasma salbutamol levels over the twelve hour dosing interval."( Single dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of 4 mg and 8 mg oral salbutamol controlled-release in patients with bronchial asthma.
Charter, MK; Clark, RA; Dhillon, DP; Lipworth, BJ; McDevitt, DG; Palmer, JB, 1989
)
0.28
" Plasma glucose, potassium, and magnesium were measured at each step of the dose-response curve."( The biochemical effects of high-dose inhaled salbutamol in patients with asthma.
Clark, RA; Fraser, CG; Lipworth, BJ; McDevitt, DG, 1989
)
0.28
" At the end of each 14-day treatment, a dose-response curve (DRC) was performed, and airway (FEV1, FEF25-75) chronotropic (HR), tremor, and metabolic (K, Glu) responses were measured at each step (from 100 to 4,000 micrograms)."( Tachyphylaxis to systemic but not to airway responses during prolonged therapy with high dose inhaled salbutamol in asthmatics.
Lipworth, BJ; McDevitt, DG; Struthers, AD, 1989
)
0.28
"Sixteen patients suffering from bronchial asthma, with or without chronic bronchitis, sufficiently severe to be treated with inhaled corticosteroids, were studied in a single-blind trial (blind observer) of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) given in three randomized dosage regimens: 500, 1000 and 2000 micrograms per day, each for 4 weeks."( Effects of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate on beta 2-receptor function in the airways and adrenal responsiveness in bronchial asthma.
Folgering, HT; Lammers, JW; Molema, J; van Herwaarden, CL, 1988
)
0.27
" There was a linear log dose-response relationship for each airways parameter (FEV1, VC, sGaw, FEF 50%)."( Beta-adrenoceptor responses to high doses of inhaled salbutamol in patients with bronchial asthma.
Brown, RA; Clark, RA; Dhillon, DP; Lipworth, BJ; McDevitt, DG, 1988
)
0.27
"25 mg/kg), the dose-response curve of clenbuterol (0."( Does a single priming injection of clenbuterol alter behavioral response to beta-adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists in mice through a time-dependent process?
Martin, P; Simon, P; Soubrie, P, 1985
)
0.27
" We investigated whether the maximal response plateau or the position of the dose-response curve is due to functional inhibition by neurogenic mechanisms or to prostaglandin release."( Limited maximal airway narrowing in nonasthmatic subjects. Role of neural control and prostaglandin release.
Daniel, EE; Hargreave, FE; Sterk, PJ; Zamel, N, 1985
)
0.27
" Biotransformations are determined by environmental or genetic factors and by the associated therapy and can change dramatically from one patient to another (interindividual variability) or for the same patient by multiple dosing (intra-individual variability)."( [Metabolism of beta-adrenergic substances. Therapeutic implications].
Brès, J; Bressolle, F; Clauzel, AM; Pistre, MC; Rachmat, H,
)
0.13
" Treatment of intact vasa deferentia with increasing concentrations of BAAM resulted in a progressive rightward shift in the dose-response curve to isoprenaline or salbutamol followed by a decreased maximum response."( Binding of agonists and antagonists to beta-adrenoceptors in rat vas deferens: relationship to functional response.
Abel, PW; May, JM; Minneman, KP, 1985
)
0.27
" The slow-release tablets were preferred by 15 of 18 children and their families when the effects, side effects and dosage were evaluated."( Terbutaline slow-release tablets in children with asthma. A comparison with t.i.d. beta 2-agonist therapy.
Croner, S; Gustafsson, M; Kjellman, NI; Säwedal, L, 1986
)
0.27
" With currently used dosing regimens, theophylline appears to produce relatively constant levels of effect on airway responsiveness and clinical efficacy around the clock, while inhaled beta 2 agonists appear to have insufficient effects at the end of longer dosing intervals."( The effect of theophylline and beta 2 agonists on airway reactivity.
Ahrens, RC; Joad, J; Milavetz, G, 1987
)
0.27
" The suggestion is made that failure to recognize the nonlinearity of the dose-response curves for bronchodilators has resulted in underestimating their combined action."( Theophylline as a bronchodilator in COPD and its combination with inhaled beta-adrenergic drugs.
Jenne, JW, 1987
)
0.27
" Dose-response curves were plotted upon the inhalation of salbutamol in two-week intervals in patients treated with betamimetics."( Development of drug tachyphylaxis in asthmatic patients treated with beta-adrenergic drugs.
Böszörményi-Nagy, G; Debreczeni, LA; Herjavecz, I; Szeitz, A, 1987
)
0.27
" Dose-response effects were clearly seen with salbutamol but not with ipratropium bromide."( Nebulized salbutamol and ipratropium bromide in asthmatic children.
Evans, NA; Lenney, W, 1986
)
0.27
" Then salbutamol was administered by a dosimetric aerosol (DA) at the usual dosage (200 micrograms) and the change in FEV1 was observed at 60 min; thereafter 40 micrograms of ipratropium bromide (IB) were administered by DA and FEV1 was measured after 60 min."( Influence of pindolol on asthmatics and effect of bronchodilators.
Antoniadou, H; Georgopoulos, D; Giulekas, D; Papakosta, D; Sotiropoulou, E; Vamvalis, C, 1986
)
0.27
" Airway dose-response curves to timolol (0-2%), L-714,465 (0-4%), and placebo (methyl cellulose) eye drops were performed in a double-blind randomised study in which airway response was measured as change in FEV1 and specific airway conductance (sGaw)."( Comparison of the airway response to eye drops of timolol and its isomer L-714,465 in asthmatic subjects.
Richards, R; Tattersfield, AE, 1987
)
0.27
" In fifteen selected chronic asthmatics, individual cumulative dose-response curves to S and IB were performed on two separate days (linear regression of bronchodilator response (delta FEV1) between 20 and 80% of maximal response, versus log dose), and the dose of S equipotent to the IB dose giving the maximal bronchodilator effect (IBopt) was calculated by interpolation of each S curve."( Cumulative dose-response curves for assessing combined effects of salbutamol and ipratropium bromide in chronic asthma.
de Lauture, D; Grandordy, BM; Marsac, J; Thomas, V, 1988
)
0.27
" Dose-response curves were obtained for inhaled salbutamol and inhaled ipratropium bromide."( Effect of three different bronchodilators during an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Agusti-Vidal, A; Campistol, J; Lloberes, P; Montserrat, JM; Picado, C; Ramis, L; Serra, J, 1988
)
0.27
" Despite this, the duration of the bronchodilator effect of procaterol on a twice daily dosage did not seem to be long enough in all patients."( Comparison between oral procaterol and salbutamol in patients with bronchial asthma.
Jaakkola, J; Terho, EO; Torkko, M; Tukiainen, H, 1988
)
0.27
" Pulse rate, blood pressure and blood levels of cyclic GMP, free fatty acid, cyclic AMP, glucose and lactic acid were measured in order to evaluate efficacy and dosage of Formoterol and to compare efficacy of this drug with that of Salbutamol."( Evaluation of a new bronchodilator, Formoterol, using biochemical parameters.
Ikuta, T; Inamizu, T; Nishimoto, Y; Onari, K; Tanabe, M; Yamakido, M, 1985
)
0.27
" Dose-response studies of the effect of epinephrine on adenosine-deaminase or isoproterenol-stimulated fat-cells demonstrate an inhibitory effect of epinephrine on lipolysis promoted by stimulation of alpha 2-adrenoceptors which occurs before the commonly described beta 1-adrenergic effect which promotes stimulation of lipolysis."( Fat cell adrenoceptors: inter- and intraspecific differences and hormone regulation.
Berlan, M; Carpene, C; Lafontan, M, 1985
)
0.27
" The air pollution dosage during exercise is much higher than during rest because of a higher ventilatory rate and both nasal and oral breathing in the former case."( Implications of air pollution effects on athletic performance.
Covert, DS; Kim, YS; Koenig, JQ; Namekata, T; Pierson, WE, 1986
)
0.27
" When 2 or 4 weeks of continuous cromolyn therapy was given in addition to a dosage 15 minutes prior to exercise, there was no significant difference compared with acute cromolyn administration alone."( A comparison of inhaled albuterol and cromolyn in the prophylaxis of exercise-induced bronchospasm.
Katz, RM; Lanier, R; Rachelefsky, GS; Rohr, AS; Siegel, SC; Spector, SL, 1987
)
0.58
" No statistically significant differences were observed in mean steady-state values for Cmax, Cmin, AUC(0-12 h) and peak-to-trough fluctuations (PTF) in comparing the two dosage formulations."( Relative bioavailability of a controlled-release albuterol formulation for twice-daily use.
Chubb, JM; Meyer, MC; Reese, ME; Sykes, RS,
)
0.39
" Ten subjects became tachyphylactic to inhaled salbutamol, assessed by a dose-response curve, before and after the 2 weeks of treatment from a metered-dose inhaler."( The effect of ketotifen on bronchial beta-adrenergic tachyphylaxis in normal human volunteers.
Pauwels, R; Van der Straeten, M, 1988
)
0.27
" Airway responsiveness thus appears to be a useful tool for evaluating inhaled beta 2-agonists and designing beta 2-agonist dosing regimens."( Use of bronchial provocation with histamine to compare the pharmacodynamics of inhaled albuterol and metaproterenol in patients with asthma.
Ahrens, RC; Annis, L; Harris, JB; Milavetz, G; Ries, R, 1987
)
0.5
" The antagonistic component of a partial agonist is seen as a parallel shift of the agonist curve to the right from a constructed additive dose-response curve, from which a dose ratio (DR) was determined for calculation of graphic estimation of KB or pA2 of partial agonists."( Simple pA2 estimation of partial agonists: comparison with the Kaumann-Blinks method.
Pöch, G; Zimmermann, I, 1988
)
0.27
" This required a threefold increase in theophylline dosage to maintain therapeutic serum theophylline concentrations."( Enhancement of theophylline clearance by intravenous albuterol.
Amirav, I; Amitai, Y; Avital, A; Godfrey, S, 1988
)
0.52
" A similar excretion pattern exhibiting a far more extensive distortion in the enantiomeric ratio was found in three subjects dosed with a single 4-mg tablet of racemic salbutamol."( Analysis of salbutamol enantiomers in human urine by chiral high-performance liquid chromatography and preliminary studies related to the stereoselective disposition kinetics in man.
Soldin, SJ; Tan, YK, 1987
)
0.27
" The doses of salbutamol inhaled via the nebulizer and MDI producing maximal bronchodilation were established by cumulative dose-response curves."( Comparison of domiciliary nebulized salbutamol and salbutamol from a metered-dose inhaler in stable chronic airflow limitation.
Fulton, TJ; Heaton, RW; Jenkins, SC; Moxham, J, 1987
)
0.27
" 4 The systemic availability (n = 3), urinary recovery of unchanged oral salbutamol and area under the plasma curve during the oral dosage interval (n = 5) were all only slightly lower (10-20%) than control values, suggesting slightly lower oral absorption."( Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of salbutamol in premature labour.
Hutchings, MJ; Morgan, DJ; Paull, JD; Wilson-Evered, E, 1987
)
0.27
" While statistically significant differences in lag time and time to peak concentration were noted among the various oral preparations, the drug is rapidly absorbed in all three dosage forms and the observed differences are unlikely to be of clinical significance."( Pharmacokinetics and absolute bioavailability of salbutamol in healthy adult volunteers.
Goldstein, DA; Soldin, SJ; Tan, YK, 1987
)
0.27
" The bronchodilator effect of the two aerosols was determined from cumulative dose-response studies."( Effect of particle size of bronchodilator aerosols on lung distribution and pulmonary function in patients with chronic asthma.
Mitchell, DM; Short, M; Solomon, MA; Spiro, SG; Tolfree, SE, 1987
)
0.27
" This study was undertaken to compare the clinical effectiveness and toxicity of these two drugs and to try to establish dosage schedules of inhaled salbutamol with spacer in the treatment of acute asthma."( [Subcutaneous adrenaline versus inhaled salbutamol in the treatment of childhood asthmatic crisis].
Bonal de Falgas, J; Farré Riba, R; Ferrés Mataró, J; Juliá Brugues, A; Mangues Bafalluy, MA, 1987
)
0.27
"A new controlled-release (CR) dosage formulation of albuterol has been developed which is suitable for twice-a-day dosing."( Comparative steady state bioavailability of conventional and controlled-release formulations of albuterol.
Dowdy, Y; Gural, R; Patrick, JE; Powell, ML; Symchowicz, S; Weisberger, M,
)
0.6
" The results suggest that enhancement of the early bronchodilator response obtained by adding oxitropium bromide to a conventional dose of salbutamol in patients with stable asthma reflects suboptimal dosing of salbutamol rather than differences between the agents in mechanisms of action, whereas enhancement in duration of response is related also to the pharmacological characteristics of oxitropium bromide."( Combination of oxitropium bromide and salbutamol in the treatment of asthma with pressurized aerosols.
Laitinen, LA; Poppius, H, 1986
)
0.27
"The sensitivity of the uterus to the inhibition of contractions by salbutamol, diltiazem or nifedipine was assessed in the ovariectomized, post-partum rat by dose-response curves following bolus intravenous (i."( The effects of long-term infusion of salbutamol, diltiazem and nifedipine on uterine contractions in the ovariectomized, post-partum rat.
Abel, MH; Hollingsworth, M, 1986
)
0.27
" Then after a further 3 wk of dosing 3 times a day of the second medication (10 patients received each medication), they were challenged once more 16 h after the last dose."( Comparison of tremor responses to orally administered albuterol and terbutaline.
Druz, WS; Jenne, JW; Shaughnessy, TK; Starkey, PW; Valcarenghi, G; Yu, C, 1986
)
0.52
" This study compared single daily versus twice daily dosing with a 24-hour theophylline, Uniphyl, in asthma and further evaluated for the additional effect of metered-dose albuterol on each theophylline regimen."( The use of a single daily theophylline dose and metered-dose albuterol in asthma treatment.
Bush, RK; Busse, WW; Smith, A, 1986
)
0.71
" Steady-state plasma levels were predictable from the kinetic data and were reached by the third day of dosing (ninth and tenth dose)."( Multiple-dose albuterol kinetics.
Chung, M; Gural, R; Patrick, JE; Powell, ML; Radwanski, E; Symchowicz, S; Weisberger, M,
)
0.49
" Statistical analyses of FEV1, FEF25-75, and FVC revealed that all doses of albuterol powder were superior to placebo within 5 min with a log dose-response trend for both degree and duration of bronchodilation."( Inhaled albuterol powder for the treatment of asthma--a dose-response study.
Kemp, JP; Meltzer, EO; Orgel, HA; Welch, MJ, 1985
)
0.93
" Both contractile cholinergic responses and relaxant nonadrenergic noncholinergic dose-response data were obtained for the in vitro bronchial specimens by electrical field stimulation."( Airway reactivity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Failure of in vivo methacholine responsiveness to correlate with cholinergic, adrenergic, or nonadrenergic responses in vitro.
Armour, CL; Hogg, JC; Paré, PD; Schellenberg, RR; Taylor, SM, 1985
)
0.27
" The addition of albuterol to theophylline improved control of severe asthma in children 2 to 6 years of age demonstrated by improvement in pulmonary function, decrease in theophylline dosage requirement, and improvement in symptoms."( Albuterol syrup in the treatment of asthma.
Bierman, CW; Furukawa, CT; Pierson, WE; Shapiro, GG, 1985
)
2.05
" 10 micrograms of clenbuterol revealed no significant differences when compared to placebo, whereas the 20 micrograms dosage as usually administered in clinical routine demonstrated significant--but only slight--differences to placebo-baseline."( [Novel quantitative assessment of the tremorogenic effects of the beta 2-mimetics clenbuterol and salbutamol after oral administration].
Schaffler, K; Schuster, D, 1985
)
0.27
" Side effects were noted in 5 patients taking nifedipine, leading to a decrease in the dosage to 30 mg per day in 3, and in one patient taking placebo."( Nifedipine in chronic bronchial asthma: a randomized double-blind crossover trial against placebo.
Boismare, F; Lemercier, JP; Leprevost, A; Moore, ND; Ozenne, G; Pasquis, P; Tardif, C, 1985
)
0.27
" The dosage of salbutamol was the one normally used and supplementary treatment was standardized."( Salbutamol vs. placebo for treatment of pertussis.
Krantz, I; Norrby, SR; Trollfors, B,
)
0.13
" These findings imply possible therapeutic advantages of oral albuterol and terbutaline with respect to dosing frequency, while the more rapid onset of oral metaproterenol suggests that it may have an advantage when used on an as-needed basis."( Comparison of the acute cardiopulmonary effects of oral albuterol, metaproterenol, and terbutaline in asthmatics.
Biedermann, AA; Chu, TJ; Wolfe, JD; Yamate, M, 1985
)
0.76
" No significant differences were observed between the three dosage groups."( Nebulised salbutamol without oxygen in severe acute asthma: how effective and how safe?
Crompton, GK; Douglas, JG; Fergusson, RJ; Grant, IW; Prescott, RJ; Rafferty, P, 1985
)
0.27
" The three dosage forms were orally administered to 12 normal male volunteers in a randomized three-way crossover study."( Comparative bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of three formulations of albuterol.
Chung, M; Gural, R; Patrick, JE; Powell, ML; Radwanski, E; Symchowicz, SS; Weisberger, M, 1985
)
0.5
" Ketotifen in the higher dosage caused a slight reduction in salbutamol usage and a modest improvement in breathing in patients not already receiving inhaled corticosteroids."( Ketotifen in adult asthma.
Dyson, AJ; Mackay, AD, 1980
)
0.26
" Diabetic patients treated with salbutamol should therefore be under close surveillance and have their insulin dosage increased."( [Metabolic risks of salbutamol in diabetic patients. A study using somatostatin (author's transl)].
Compagnie, MJ; Dellenbach, P; Schlienger, JL; Stephan, F, 1980
)
0.26
" Dose-response curves to a beta agonist, albuterol, were obtained in six normal subjects by measuring specific airway conductance (sGaw) after increasing doses of inhaled albuterol."( Assessment of bronchial beta blockade after oral bevantolol.
Baldwin, CJ; Gribbin, HR; Mackay, AD; Tattersfield, AE, 1981
)
0.53
" Dose-response curves to the relaxant effects of isoprenaline, salbutamol, adrenaline and noradrenaline were determined on the partially contracted smooth muscles of the cat nictitating membrane following alpha-adrenoreceptor blockade in order to test the hypothesis of a causal relationship between the inhibition of neuronal uptake and denervation supersensitivity."( Denervation and beta-adrenoreceptors of the cat nictitating membrane.
Nickerson, M; Varma, DR, 1981
)
0.26
"We have compared bronchodilator dose-response curves to inhaled salbutamol in seven normal and eight asthmatic subjects."( Dose-response curves to inhaled beta-adrenoceptor agonists in normal and asthmatic subjects.
Barnes, PJ; Pride, NB, 1983
)
0.27
" sGaw was measured before dosing and after 2 h, just before salbutamol was inhaled."( Time course of the bronchial response to salbutamol after placebo, betaxolol and propranolol.
Kaik, G; Palminteri, R, 1983
)
0.27
"The dose-response curves of the beta-adrenergic agonists isoprenaline (mixed beta 1 and beta 2), prenalterol (beta 1-selective), noradrenaline (more beta 1 than beta 2) and salbutamol (beta 2-selective) were studied on adipose cells of the rat, in vitro."( Characterization of the beta-adrenoceptor of the adipose cell of the rat.
Curtis-Prior, PB; Tan, S, 1983
)
0.27
" Ipratropium bromide in adequate dosage appears to be effective in reducing morning dipping in asthma."( Ipratropium bromide in patients with nocturnal asthma.
Cox, ID; Hughes, DT; McDonnell, KA, 1984
)
0.27
" dosage with salbutamol (1-10 micrograms/kg), aminophylline (5-20 mg/kg) or ipratropium bromide (1-10 micrograms/kg) on total lung resistance in the anaesthetised state."( Pulmonary responses of salbutamol tolerant guinea-pigs to aminophylline and ipratropium bromide.
Tomlinson, DR; Ward, MJ, 1984
)
0.27
" This provides a simple, rapid and reproducible way of obtaining linear dose-response curves by plotting times of exposures against absolute or percent increases in sRaw."( Drug effect on bronchial response to PGF2 alpha and water inhalation.
Bianco, S; Damonte, C; Robuschi, M, 1983
)
0.27
" Cumulative log dose-response curves were constructed."( Methacholine dose-response curves in normal and asthmatic man: effect of starting conductance and pharmacological antagonism.
Chung, KF; Snashall, PD, 1984
)
0.27
"A dose-response study of the effect of naloxone on schedule-induced drinking confirmed that this type of drinking is resistant to the opiate antagonist at doses which depressed drinking induced by water-deprivation, hypertonic saline and salbutamol."( The effect of naloxone on schedule-induced and other drinking.
Singer, G; Wallace, M; Willis, G, 1984
)
0.27
" Nineteen aerobic, non-atopic, athletes (10 females, 9 males) were studied in a double-blind fashion to determine the effect of a therapeutic dosage of salbutamol on pulmonary function, oxygen consumption (VO2max), heart rate (HR), and anaerobic threshold (AT)."( Salbutamol and treadmill performance in non-atopic athletes.
Dunwoody, DW; Filsinger, IB; Jang, F; McKenzie, DC; Rhodes, EC; Stevens, A; Stirling, DR; Wiley, JP, 1983
)
0.27
" On each occasion a regression line for the descending part of the log-cumulative dose-response curve was computed."( Prostaglandins and the control of airways responses to histamine in normal and asthmatic subjects.
Walters, EH, 1983
)
0.27
" Analysis of variance of the results indicated significant dose-response relationships and showed the larger doses to have a longer duration of action."( Dose-response study of inhaled salbutamol powder in chronic airflow obstruction.
Corris, PA; Gibson, GJ; Nariman, S; Neville, E, 1983
)
0.27
" The FEV1 dose-response curves were almost identical indicating bronchodilating equipotency between the two modes of administration."( The effect of powder aerosol compared to pressurized aerosol.
Löfdahl, CG; Svedmyr, K; Svedmyr, N, 1982
)
0.26
" Nine patients participated in a dose-response study."( A comparison between inhaled clenbuterol and salbutamol in chronic bronchitis with reversible airway obstruction.
Baronti, A; Grieco, A; Vibelli, C, 1980
)
0.26
" The development of resistance was assessed from salbutamol dose-response studies in which the airway response was measured as specific airway conductance (sGaw)."( Airway response to salbutamol: effect of regular salbutamol inhalations in normal, atopic, and asthmatic subjects.
Harvey, JE; Tattersfield, AE, 1982
)
0.26
"Cumulative inhalation dose-response curves for the response to prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) have been constructed in normal subjects and patients with mild, stable asthma."( Interactions between response to inhaled prostaglandin E2 and chronic beta-adrenergic agonist treatment.
Bevan, M; Davies, BH; Walters, EH, 1982
)
0.26
" We constructed cumulative log dose-response curves and determined the steepest slope and the provocative dose of histamine (PD35) needed to cause a 35% fall in specific airway conductance (SGaw)."( Histamine dose-response relationships in normal and asthmatic subjects. The importance of starting airway caliber.
Chung, KF; Keyes, SJ; Morgan, B; Snashall, PD, 1982
)
0.26
" The dose-response curve for non-esterified fatty acids and insulin, though displaced downwards, did not indicate an impaired response to salbutamol since the shape was unchanged."( Airway and metabolic responsiveness to intravenous salbutamol in asthma: effect of regular inhaled salbutamol.
Alberti, KG; Baldwin, CJ; Harvey, JE; Tattersfield, AE; Wood, PJ, 1981
)
0.26
"We examined the use of partial expiratory flow-volume (PEFV) curves to obtain dose-response curves to an inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist (salbutamol) in eight normal subjects."( Partial flow-volume curves to measure bronchodilator dos-response curves in normal humans.
Barnes, PJ; Gribbin, HR; Osmanliev, D; Pride, NB, 1981
)
0.26
" At no dosage level was there synergy between the two agents in terms of either mean percentage increase in FEV1 or the integrated response."( Intravenous salbutamol and aminophylline in asthma: a search for synergy.
Dart, AM; Davies, BH; Handslip, PD, 1981
)
0.26
" So with the dosage used here no implication of central beta-adrenoceptors in sleep mechanisms and production of epileptic activity are suggested."( Effect of salbutamol, a putative cerebral beta agonist on sleep stages and interictal epileptic discharges.
Autret, A; DEgiovanni, E; Laffont, F; Lucas, B, 1981
)
0.26
"1 Cumulative dose-response curves (FEV1) to pressurized aerosol salbutamol were established in 17 patients admitted to hospital with acute severe asthma."( Comparative efficacy of salbutamol by pressurized aerosol and wet nebulizer in acute asthma.
Madsen, BW; Paterson, JW; Tarala, RA, 1980
)
0.26
" The highest dose used in the dose-response trials (=0."( Inhalation of racemic epinephrine in children with asthma. Dose-response relation and comparison with salbutamol.
Kjellman, B; Tollig, H; Wettrell, G, 1980
)
0.26
" On the last day of each period a cumulative dose-response experiment with terbutaline in the doses 50, 100, 250 and 500 micrograms (cumulative dose 900 micrograms) was performed."( Influence of budesonide on the response to inhaled terbutaline in children with mild asthma.
Agertoft, L; Fuglsang, G; Pedersen, S; Vikre-Jørgensen, J, 1995
)
0.29
" A histamine challenge test was done 12 h after the last dose of each treatment period, and dose-response curves to inhaled salbutamol (200-3200 micrograms) were constructed 36 h after the last dose."( Bronchodilator subsensitivity to salbutamol after twice daily salmeterol in asthmatic patients.
Grove, A; Lipworth, BJ, 1995
)
0.29
" A dose-response curve for nebulized ipratropium was determined."( [Use of ipratropium bromide by inhalation in the treatment of acute asthma in children. Clinical experience].
Beck, R, 1995
)
0.29
"05), which is consistent with albuterol's recommended dosing frequency of every 4 to 6 hours."( Comparison of the bronchodilatory effects of cetirizine, albuterol, and both together versus placebo in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.
Corren, J; Katz, RM; Nicodemus, CF; Rachelefsky, GS; Schanker, HM; Siegel, SC; Spector, SL, 1995
)
0.82
"When testing the response to beta 2-agonist drugs in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a dose-response assessment should be undertaken."( Salmeterol and formoterol in partially reversible severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a dose-response study.
Cazzola, M; D'Amato, G; Matera, MG; Rossi, F; Santangelo, G; Vinciguerra, A, 1995
)
0.29
"The safety, tolerability and systemic pharmacodynamic activity of the salmeterol/HFA134a inhaler, the current salmeterol inhaler, and placebo (HFA134a) were compared in 12 healthy volunteers in a double blind, randomised crossover study using a cumulative dosing design."( Salmeterol inhaler using a non-chlorinated propellant, HFA134a: systemic pharmacodynamic activity in healthy volunteers.
Kirby, SM; Smith, J; Ventresca, GP, 1995
)
0.29
" Bronchodilator dose-response studies were performed by administering increasing doses of isuprel intravenously before and after treatment with salbutamol."( [Bronchial reactivity after regular inhalation of salbutamol].
Krasnowska, M; Małlolepszy, J; Passowicz-Muszyńska, E, 1995
)
0.29
" The dose-response curve for each subject was measured by a log transformation and linear regression analysis as well as a formula fitted to the data points to obtain values for a (slope) and b (position)."( Effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction.
Huang, TJ; Kuo, HP; Lin, HC; Shieh, WB; Wang, CH; Yang, CT; Yu, CT, 1995
)
0.29
" Maximum plasma concentrations attained at 1 h after dosing ranged between 35."( The determination in human plasma of 1-hydroxy-2-naphthoic acid following administration of salmeterol xinafoate.
Carey, PF; Chilton, AS; Godward, RE, 1995
)
0.29
" In conclusion, combining the standard dosages of ipratropium bromide and salbutamol may provide greater bronchodilation than doubling the standard dosage of ipratropium bromide in patients with COPD."( Bronchodilating effects of combined therapy with clinical dosages of ipratropium bromide and salbutamol for stable COPD: comparison with ipratropium bromide alone.
Ikeda, A; Izumi, T; Koyama, H; Nishimura, K, 1995
)
0.29
" Dosing intervals and the use of other medications were determined by the treating physician."( Metered-dose inhalers with spacers vs nebulizers for pediatric asthma.
Chou, KJ; Crain, EF; Cunningham, SJ, 1995
)
0.29
" Isolated atrial strips showed a right shift of their dose-response curve to isoprenaline in the presence of the highly selective beta 2-AR antagonist ICI 118,551 at concentrations above 1 x 10(-8) mol/L."( The effects of sympathomimetics on the cardiovascular system of sheep.
Allen, R; Alley, MR; Baxter, S; Burgess, C; Crane, J; Dallimore, JA; Davie, PS; Kealey, AS; Lapwood, KR; Pack, RJ, 1994
)
0.29
" Dose-response curves were constructed using cumulative doses of 100 micrograms, 200 micrograms, 400 micrograms, 1000 micrograms, 2000 micrograms, and 4000 micrograms, and airways and systemic responses were measured 20 minutes after each dose with 40 minute increments."( Comparison of the relative airways and systemic potencies of inhaled fenoterol and salbutamol in asthmatic patients.
Clark, RA; Dhillon, DP; Lipworth, BJ; McDevitt, DG; Newnham, DM; Winter, JH, 1995
)
0.29
"01), but significant differences between salmeterol doses were no longer evident, despite an apparent dose-response effect."( A 1-week dose-ranging study of inhaled salmeterol in patients with asthma.
Bierman, CW; Bronsky, EA; Kemp, JP; Liddle, RF; Orgel, HA; Tinkelman, DG; van As, A, 1994
)
0.29
" Salmeterol, 42 micrograms twice daily, is a safe and effective dosage for patients with mild-to-moderate asthma who are persistently symptomatic and require maintenance bronchodilator therapy."( A 1-week dose-ranging study of inhaled salmeterol in patients with asthma.
Bierman, CW; Bronsky, EA; Kemp, JP; Liddle, RF; Orgel, HA; Tinkelman, DG; van As, A, 1994
)
0.29
" Subjects received cumulative doses of up to 400 micrograms (50 + 50 + 100 + 100 + 100 micrograms at 45 min intervals) inhaled salmeterol prior to a 13 day dosing schedule of twice-daily inhaled salmeterol 100 micrograms or placebo."( Does tachyphylaxis occur to the non-pulmonary effects of salmeterol?
Chilton, JE; Keene, ON; Maconochie, JG; Minton, NA, 1994
)
0.29
"The purpose of the present study was to assess the degree of protection of inhaled salmeterol against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) after chronic compared with single dosing in patients with asthma."( Reduced protection against exercise induced bronchoconstriction after chronic dosing with salmeterol.
Cree, IA; Dhillon, DP; Ingram, CG; Lipworth, BJ; Ramage, L, 1994
)
0.29
"This study investigated the effects of an osmotic release oral drug delivery system of metoprolol on the changes induced by cumulative doses of inhaled salbutamol on bronchomotor tone, skeletal muscle, and the circulatory system after single (day 1) and multiple (day 7) dosing in 18 hypertensive asthmatic patients (forced expiratory volume in 1 second > 50% predicted; diastolic blood pressure > 90 mm Hg)."( Osmotic release oral drug delivery system of metoprolol in hypertensive asthmatic patients. Pharmacodynamic effects on beta 2-adrenergic receptors.
Bauer, K; Kaik, B; Kaik, G, 1994
)
0.29
" The dose-response curve to methacholine reached a plateau in all the responders."( Evaluation of asymptomatic subjects with low forced expiratory ratios (FEV1/VC).
Kivity, S; Schwarz, Y; Solomon, A; Topilsky, M; Trajber, I, 1994
)
0.29
" These results indicate that inhalational administration of a selective PDE isoenzyme type III/IV inhibitor, SDZ ISQ 844 decreases airway responsiveness at dosage which does not affect the base-line respiratory resistance."( [Effects of inhaled SDZ ISQ 844, a cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase isoenzyme type III/IV inhibitor, on airway responsiveness in beagles].
Adachi, M; Horikoshi, S; Idaira, K; Imai, T; Okamoto, M, 1994
)
0.29
" They are an expression of pharmacological activity brought about by the excessive beta stimulant action of high dosage with the drug."( A review of the toxicology of salbutamol (albuterol).
Libretto, SE, 1994
)
0.55
" This emphasizes the need for well-designed research to develop optimal dosage regimens in paediatric patients with bronchiolitis."( Pattern of drug usage in bronchiolitis.
Nahata, MC; Schad, PA, 1994
)
0.29
"This study investigated the effects of isamoltane on the changes induced by cumulative doses of inhaled albuterol (salbutamol) on bronchomotor tone, skeletal muscle, circulatory system, and metabolism after single (day 1) and multiple dosing (day 7) in 15 healthy subjects."( Assessment of beta-adrenergic receptor blockade after isamoltane, a 5-HT1-receptor active compound, in healthy volunteers.
Bauer, K; Dietersdorfer, F; Kaik, G, 1993
)
0.5
" The PD20 (dose of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1) was measured before and 11, 35, and 59 h after cessation of treatment and a bronchodilator dose-response study before and 83 h after cessation of treatment."( Asthma control during and after cessation of regular beta 2-agonist treatment.
Pavord, ID; Tattersfield, AE; Wahedna, I; Wisniewski, AF; Wong, CS, 1993
)
0.29
" The lung function parameters after cumulative dosing of salbutamol were equal during each study day."( A novel multiple dose powder inhaler. Salbutamol powder and aerosol give equal bronchodilatation with equal doses.
Haahtela, T; Korhonen, P; Laurikainen, K; Nyberg, A; Silvasti, M; Vidgren, M, 1994
)
0.29
" The main finding was that older children had higher concentrations than younger children, despite similar dosage regimens."( Systemic absorption of salbutamol following nebulizer delivery in acute asthma.
Dawson, KP; Manglick, P; Penna, AC; Tam, J, 1993
)
0.29
"The study deals with the effect of salbutamol powder (Ventodisk) administered with Diskhaler device comparatively to salbutamol dosed aerosols."( [Effectiveness of salbutamol powder (Ventodisk Glaxo) compared to dosed aerosols (sultanol)].
Duţu, S; Ionescu, AA; Macri, A; Popescu, O; Stoicescu, P,
)
0.13
" A further 416 (57) micrograms reduction in inhaled corticosteroid dosage was possible during the treatment phase but this was almost identical in the WEB 2086 and placebo-treated groups, amounting to 353 (92) and 481 (65) micrograms/day respectively (not significant [NS])."( The effect of the orally active platelet-activating factor antagonist WEB 2086 in the treatment of asthma.
Calverley, PM; Dhillon, P; Higgins, C; Holgate, ST; Johnston, SL; Ramhamadany, E; Spence, DP; Turner, S; Winning, A; Winter, J, 1994
)
0.29
" No patient required escalation of dosage or additional intervention such as intravenous beta-agonist therapy or mechanical ventilation."( Low-dose beta-agonist continuous nebulization therapy for status asthmaticus in children.
Eid, NS; Montgomery, VL, 1994
)
0.29
"The relative bronchodilator (delta FEV1, V25, V50) potency and side effect profile (delta tremor, heart rate, breathlessness, BP) of nebulized salbutamol and fenoterol were evaluated by means of a randomized, double-blind, crossover, cumulative (50 to 2,500 micrograms) dose-response study."( Dose-effect relationship of the beta-agonists fenoterol and salbutamol in patients with asthma.
Dolovich, MB; Kazim, F; Newhouse, MT, 1994
)
0.29
"8) and less total dosage (34 +/- 16 mg compared with 70 +/- 34 mg; mean difference, -36 mg; CI, -60."( Does aminophylline benefit adults admitted to the hospital for an acute exacerbation of asthma?
Aull, L; Harman, E; Hendeles, L; Huang, D; O'Brien, RG; Reents, S; Shieh, G; Visser, J, 1993
)
0.29
") dosing of SB, fraction of dose which avoids the hepatic first-pass-effect (Fh) was calculated from the areas under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC)."( [Absorption and first-pass-effect of salbutamol after intraduodenal and intrarectal administration in rabbits].
Ito, K; Kurosawa, N; Owada, E, 1993
)
0.29
" Drugs were dosed as dry powders directly into the tracheobronchial tree and MVL was assessed by using the fluorescent macromolecule fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran (FITC-dextran, 150 kD)."( Effects of isoenzyme-selective inhibitors of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase on microvascular leak in guinea pig airways in vivo.
Karlsson, JA; Raeburn, D, 1993
)
0.29
"The authors compared the effectiveness and advantages of the powdered inhalation variety of the preparation Ventodisc (Glaxo) with the "classical" dosed inhalation form of Salbutamol (Polfa) in 21 patients with bronchial asthma."( [The bronchodilator agent, Ventodisk, in the powdered inhalation form without freon is better].
Malý, M; Reisová, M; Vondra, V, 1993
)
0.29
" Although transient, the dose-response relationship and duration of effect is unknown."( Hypokalemia after pediatric albuterol overdose: a case series.
Leikin, JB; Linowiecki, KA; Paloucek, F; Soglin, DF, 1994
)
0.58
" We compared the dose-response relationship to albuterol by wet nebulization or metered dose inhaler in acute asthma."( A comparison of albuterol administered by metered dose inhaler (and holding chamber) or wet nebulizer in acute asthma.
Afilalo, M; Colacone, A; Kreisman, H; Wolkove, N, 1993
)
0.89
" The cumulative dose-response technique is applicable in the emergency department setting and is helpful in comparing the relative utility of various bronchodilator regimens."( A comparison of albuterol administered by metered dose inhaler (and holding chamber) or wet nebulizer in acute asthma.
Afilalo, M; Colacone, A; Kreisman, H; Wolkove, N, 1993
)
0.63
" These data indicate that the acute effect of albuterol inhalation at twice the recommended dosage has no positive effect on endurance performance measures or pulmonary function in athletes who are not asthmatic."( Effects of acute inhalation of albuterol on submaximal and maximal VO2 and blood lactate.
Fleck, SJ; Lucia, A; Storms, WW; Vint, PF; Wallach, JM; Zimmerman, SD, 1993
)
0.83
" The slopes of the dose-response curves of FEV1 and plasma cAMP to intravenous S were unaffected by the two treatment courses."( Effects of therapeutic doses of salbutamol alone and combined with beclomethasone dipropionate on airway responsiveness and cyclic AMP plasma levels in asthmatic patients.
Adami, S; Ferrari, M; Lo Cascio, V; Olivieri, M; Prior, M; Romito, D; Squassante, L; Testi, R, 1993
)
0.29
" The method was applied, without any interferences from the excipients, to the determination of the drug in a tablet dosage form and in drug dissolution studies."( Voltammetric study of salbutamol and application to its determination in a tablet dosage form and dissolution profiles for the dosage form.
Munden, R; Sagar, KA; Smyth, MR, 1993
)
0.29
" Optimal dosing will be obtained when the catheter extends the full length of the tracheal tube."( Dosing efficiency and particle-size characteristics of pressurized metered-dose inhaler aerosols in narrow catheters.
Chambers, C; Dolovich, M; Lerman, J; Taylor, RH, 1993
)
0.29
"In order to evaluate rectal administration of salbutamol (SB), five healthy volunteers were dosed orally and rectally with racemic SB (0."( Serum concentration and cardiovascular effects of salbutamol after oral and rectal administration in healthy volunteers.
Bando, K; Ito, K; Kato, A; Kurosawa, N; Kurosawa, S; Owada, E, 1993
)
0.29
" The aim of this study was to seek such a relationship in young asthmatic children using dose-response curves (DRC)."( The effect of age on bronchodilator responsiveness.
Landau, LI; LeSouëf, PN; Turner, DJ, 1993
)
0.29
"In order to obtain a basic knowledge for developing the rectal dosage form of salbutamol (SB), a comparison of the bioavailability was made between oral and rectal administrations."( [Comparison of bioavailability of salbutamol between oral and rectal administration in rabbits].
Ito, K; Kurosawa, N; Morishima, S; Owada, E, 1993
)
0.29
" The dose-response curve for melatonin shows an approximate 1000-fold shift in potency in the RCS rat."( Agonist-induced effects on cyclic AMP metabolism are affected in pigment epithelial cells of the Royal College of Surgeons rat.
Nash, MS; Osborne, NN, 1995
)
0.29
" Dosage of isoprenaline increased from 1 to 12 micrograms/min, and salbutamol increased from 4 to 64 micrograms/min during the trial."( Therapeutic trial of sympathomimetics in three cases of complete heart block in the fetus.
Allan, LD; Groves, AM; Rosenthal, E, 1995
)
0.29
"We studied three doses of inhaled salbutamol, 200, 400, and 800 micrograms/day, to determine dose-response curves for these two adverse effects."( Salbutamol-induced increased airway responsiveness to allergen and reduced protection versus methacholine: dose response.
Bhagat, R; Cockcroft, DW; Swystun, VA, 1996
)
0.29
" In addition, agents that can be dosed as needed (i."( Cost comparison of beta 2-agonist bronchodilators used in the treatment of asthma.
Nightingale, CH,
)
0.13
") dosing was compared to one dose at night and to placebo."( Treatment of nocturnal asthma by addition of oral slow-release albuterol to standard treatment in stable asthma patients.
Ariaansz, M; Nauta, JJ; Postmus, PE; Raaijmakers, JA; Van Keimpema, AR, 1996
)
0.53
"This study compares the safety and efficacy of HFA 134a salbutamol sulfate (Airomir in the 3M CFC-free system [3M Pharmaceuticals]) and CFC 11/12 salbutamol (Ventolin [Allen & Hanburys]) in a cumulative dose-response (1, 1, 2, 4, 8 inhalations at 30-min intervals) study in asthmatic patients."( Cumulative dose-response study of non-CFC propellant HFA 134a salbutamol sulfate metered-dose inhaler in patients with asthma.
Cline, AC; Ekholm, BP; Kleerup, EC; Tashkin, DP, 1996
)
0.29
" Both HFA 134a salbutamol sulfate and CFC 11/12 salbutamol displayed a significant dose-response for FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, serum potassium, heart rate, and systolic BP."( Cumulative dose-response study of non-CFC propellant HFA 134a salbutamol sulfate metered-dose inhaler in patients with asthma.
Cline, AC; Ekholm, BP; Kleerup, EC; Tashkin, DP, 1996
)
0.29
") provide a convenient, twice-daily dosing regimen, but are indicated only for patients > or = 12 years of age."( Extended-release albuterol in the treatment of 6- to 12-year-old asthmatic children.
Boltansky, H; Harrison, JE; Kobayashi, RH; Lorber, RR; Pearlman, DS; Shapiro, G; Skoner, DP; Trochelmann, LM, 1996
)
0.63
" Hypothetically, twice daily dosing of salmeterol may result in continuous protection."( Airway responsiveness after a single dose of salmeterol and during four months of treatment in children with asthma.
Creyghton, FB; de Jongste, JC; Hop, WC; Kerrebijn, KF; van den Berg, M; van Rooij, RW; Verberne, AA, 1996
)
0.29
" One hour after inhaling single doses of placebo, salmeterol 25 micrograms, or formoterol 12 micrograms, dose-response curves to repeated doses of inhaled fenoterol were constructed (cumulative doses of 100-3200 micrograms)."( Effects of prior treatment with salmeterol and formoterol on airway and systemic beta 2 responses to fenoterol.
Grove, A; Lipworth, BJ, 1996
)
0.29
" There were no significant differences in the area under the dose-response curve for any of the parameters during the dose-response curve following treatment with salmeterol or formoterol compared with placebo."( Effects of prior treatment with salmeterol and formoterol on airway and systemic beta 2 responses to fenoterol.
Grove, A; Lipworth, BJ, 1996
)
0.29
"Prior treatment with low doses of salmeterol or formoterol does not significantly alter bronchodilator dose-response curves to repeated doses of fenoterol in stable asthmatic patients."( Effects of prior treatment with salmeterol and formoterol on airway and systemic beta 2 responses to fenoterol.
Grove, A; Lipworth, BJ, 1996
)
0.29
"The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of albuterol dosing schedule on clinical outcome in subjects with moderate to severe stable asthma."( The effect of inhaled albuterol in moderate to severe asthma.
Apter, AJ; Clive, J; McNally, D; Metersky, M; Reisine, ST; Wells, M; Willard, A; ZuWallack, RL, 1996
)
0.85
"In our sample of patients with moderate to severe asthma, four times daily dosing of albuterol did not lead to deterioration of asthma control."( The effect of inhaled albuterol in moderate to severe asthma.
Apter, AJ; Clive, J; McNally, D; Metersky, M; Reisine, ST; Wells, M; Willard, A; ZuWallack, RL, 1996
)
0.83
"1% predicted were studied in a randomised double blind single dosing crossover study."( Lung bioavailability of generic and innovator salbutamol metered dose inhalers.
Clark, DJ; Clark, G; Gordon-Smith, J; Lipworth, BJ; McPhate, G, 1996
)
0.29
" We wanted to assess whether the combination of a beta 2-bronchodilator with an anti-inflammatory treatment in the same metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with a regular dosing schedule might improve compliance."( Compliance with nedocromil sodium and a nedocromil sodium/salbutamol combination. Compliance Working Group.
Braunstein, GL; Harper, AE; Trinquet, G, 1996
)
0.29
" The longer dosing intervals, which may enhance compliance, encourage its administration in patients with COPD."( A comparison of the bronchodilating effects of salmeterol, salbutamol and ipratropium bromide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Calderaro, F; Caputi, M; Cazzola, M; Di Perna, F; Matera, MG; Rossi, F; Vinciguerra, A, 1995
)
0.29
" Salmeterol and salbutamol produced the same maximal increase in sGAW and had the same area under the dose-response curves."( Airway effects of salmeterol in healthy individuals.
Bake, B; Bergendal, A; Johansson, A; Löfdahl, CG; Lötvall, J; Skoogh, BE, 1995
)
0.29
"6 mg) and oral (4 mg) dosing with racemic drug to seven normal male volunteers."( Enantioselective disposition of salbutamol in man following oral and intravenous administration.
Boulton, DW; Fawcett, JP, 1996
)
0.29
" While trypan blue potentiated the effect of histamine and shifted its dose-response curve to the left, it did not affect the contractile effects of acetylcholine."( Effect of trypan blue on the action of acetylcholine, histamine and salbutamol in the isolated guinea-pig ileum.
Damankeshideh, M; Mahmoudian, M, 1996
)
0.29
" Additionally, during dosing with TBH, fewer patients experienced adverse events than during dosing with RH or DH."( Relative efficacy of three different inhalers containing salbutamol in patients with asthma.
Hamersma, WB; Mahadewsingh, JV; Schreurs, AJ, 1996
)
0.29
" It is also important when considering new dosage routes or formulations in order to optimize therapeutic plasma concentrations of the active enantiomer."( Enantioselective disposition of albuterol in humans.
Boulton, DW; Fawcett, JP, 1996
)
0.58
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of single and chronic dosing with salmeterol on exercise capacity and lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease."( Effects of regular salmeterol on lung function and exercise capacity in patients with chronic obstructive airways disease.
Dhillon, DP; Grove, A; Ingram, CG; Jenkins, RJ; Lipworth, BJ; Ramage, L; Reid, P; Smith, RP; Winter, JH, 1996
)
0.29
" When selecting a 15-min pretreatment interval with equieffective anti-WFR doses from the first dose-response experiments (i."( Effects of local treatment with salmeterol and terbutaline on anti-IgE-induced wheal, flare, and late induration in human skin.
Grönneberg, R; Raud, J, 1996
)
0.29
"In human subjects, chronic beta2-agonist dosing reduces mononuclear leukocyte (MNL) beta-adrenoceptor numbers."( In vivo quantification of human pulmonary beta-adrenoceptors: effect of beta-agonist therapy.
Hayes, MJ; Hughes, JM; Ind, PW; Jones, T; Qing, F; Rahman, SU; Rhodes, CG; Sriskandan, S, 1996
)
0.29
"These results confirm that there is activation of the RAS in asthmatic subjects by single doses of nebulized beta 2-agonists and that repeated dosing with nebulized albuterol has further, additive effects on plasma Ang II levels."( The effect of nebulized albuterol on the activity of the renin-angiotensin system in asthma.
Connell, JM; Millar, EA; Thomson, NC, 1997
)
0.8
" An appropriate dosing schedule for fenoterol needs to be redefined."( Oral fenoterol versus sustained release theophylline in adult asthmatics.
Almagro, J; Andrade, RJ; Hidalgo Sanchez, R; Lucena, MI; Sanchez de la Cuesta, F, 1997
)
0.3
" A dose-response increase in pulmonary function was found, but only 66% of the subjects improved sufficiently to be sent home."( Observations on the effects of aerosolized albuterol in acute asthma.
Dixon, L; Galan, G; Hejal, R; McFadden, ER; Strauss, L, 1997
)
0.56
"This was a 1-week study evaluating the safety and efficacy of two dosage regimens of salmeterol in children with asthma."( A one-week dose-ranging study of inhaled salmeterol in children with asthma.
Bronsky, EA; Chervinsky, P; Howland, WC; Liddle, R; Nathan, RA; Pollard, SJ; Prenner, B; Stahl, E; Weinstein, S, 1997
)
0.3
" The aim of this study was to determine the effects of regular treatment with the long-acting beta-agonist, salmeterol, on the methacholine dose-response curve (DRC) in mild-to-moderate asthmatics."( Effects of long-acting and short-acting beta-agonists on methacholine dose-response curves in asthmatics.
O'Shaughnessy, AD; Sears, MR; Walker, CM; Wong, AG, 1997
)
0.3
"The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of switching to once-daily (qd) administration of flunisolide in patients with asthma that was controlled by twice-daily (bid) dosing of this inhaled steroid."( The effectiveness of once-daily dosing of inhaled flunisolide in maintaining asthma control.
Bodenheimer, S; Bronsky, EA; Chervinsky, P; Cohen, L; Corren, J; Goldsobel, AB; Gong, H; Kaliner, MA; Lotner, GZ; Rachelefsky, GS; Rosen, JP; White, MV; ZuWallack, RL, 1997
)
0.3
" The shape of the dose-response curves and the magnitude of the total increase in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was identical for CPAP and control conditions."( Aerosol kinetics and bronchodilator efficacy during continuous positive airway pressure delivered by face mask.
Bersten, AD; Parkes, SN, 1997
)
0.3
"Short-term salmeterol use within the prescribed dosage was not shown to increase short-term power output in nonasthmatic cyclists."( The effects of salmeterol on power output in nonasthmatic athletes.
Fleck, SJ; McDowell, SL; Storms, WW, 1997
)
0.3
"We conclude that a single 50-microg dose of salmeterol has an excellent protective effect against exercise-induced asthma for at least 9 hours, but that this effect may wane during regular once-daily salmeterol treatment, despite the reduced frequency of dosing and despite concomitant use of inhaled glucocorticoids."( Tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol in adolescents with exercise-induced asthma using concurrent inhaled glucocorticoid treatment.
Cheang, MS; Gerstner, TV; Simons, FE, 1997
)
0.3
" L-NMMA coinfusion inhibited responses (area under the dose-response curve) to isoproterenol (0."( Effects of inhibition of the L-arginine/nitric oxide pathway on vasodilation caused by beta-adrenergic agonists in human forearm.
Chowienczyk, PJ; Dawes, M; Ritter, JM, 1997
)
0.3
"The use of inhaled antibiotics in the treatment of cystic fibrosis has become widespread despite controversy in the literature as to the appropriate dosing regimen and its effectiveness."( The choice of jet nebulizer, nebulizing flow, and addition of albuterol affects the output of tobramycin aerosols.
Coates, AL; Kelemen, S; MacDonald, J; MacNeish, CF; Meisner, D; Thibert, R; Vadas, E, 1997
)
0.54
" For secondary end points salmeterol treatment was associated with higher morning and evening peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in one second; a reduction in symptoms, bronchodilator use and airway responsiveness to methacholine; and no effect on serum potassium concentration, 24 hour heart rate, or the final forced expiratory volume in one second achieved during a salbutamol dose-response study."( Effect of long-term treatment with salmeterol on asthma control: a double blind, randomised crossover study.
Bennett, J; Clark, M; Cooper, S; Lewis, S; Oborne, J; Rushton, L; Tattersfield, AE; Thompson Coon, J; Wilding, P, 1997
)
0.3
" Interactive mixtures of micronized Salmeterol Xinafoate adhered to irrespirable lactose monohydrate carrier particles were used as model dosage forms."( The development of a cascade impactor simulator based on adhesion force measurements to aid the development of dry powder inhalations.
Podczeck, F, 1997
)
0.3
"), the heart rate dose-response curves to isoprenaline were shifted to the right of those determined in matched groups of vehicle-pretreated animals."( Celiprolol: agonist and antagonist effects at cardiac beta 1- and vascular beta 2-adrenoceptors determined under in vivo conditions in the rat.
Alda, O; Alvarez-Guerra, M; Garay, RP, 1997
)
0.3
"A group of 20 patients with moderate bronchial asthma aged 18 through 65, previously treated with Becotide inhaler for 4 weeks was given Serevent in regular dosage for 4 weeks."( [Serevent in the treatment of moderate bronchial asthma].
Acasandri, E; Arghir, O; Filip, G; Floca, L; Mihai, D; Panghea, P; Voicu, G,
)
0.13
" Beta 2 adrenoceptor function was evaluated by measuring lymphocyte beta 2 adrenoceptor parameters and constructing dose-response curves to salbutamol (100-1600 micrograms)."( Loss of normal cyclical beta 2 adrenoceptor regulation and increased premenstrual responsiveness to adenosine monophosphate in stable female asthmatic patients.
Lipworth, BJ; McFarlane, LC; Tan, KS, 1997
)
0.3
"05) in terms of the calculation method used (relation of the areas under the plasma level curve Loo-Riegelman, deconvolution) nor in terms of the dosage form (Ventolin Volmax, SG7 and SG14)."( Influence of route of administration and dosage form in the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of salbutamol.
Calvo, MB; Caramella, C; Conte, U; Domínguez-Gil, A; Gascón, AR; Hernández, RM; Pedraz, JL,
)
0.13
" Dose-response curves for the effects of isoprenaline (non selective beta-agonist), salbutamol (beta2-agonist), dobutamine (beta1-agonist) on ICa were obtained in the absence and presence of various concentrations of ICI 118551 (beta2-antagonist), metoprolol (beta1-antagonist) and xamoterol (partial beta1-agonist) to derive EC50 (i."( Pharmacological characterization of the receptors involved in the beta-adrenoceptor-mediated stimulation of the L-type Ca2+ current in frog ventricular myocytes.
Fischmeister, R; Jurevicius, J; Skeberdis, VA, 1997
)
0.3
" Even when controlling for dosage in the preceding 24 h, there was a 262-fold and 810-fold variation in the urinary concentrations for unchanged and total salbutamol, respectively, among the community patients."( Investigation of urinary levels of salbutamol in asthmatic patients receiving inhaled therapy.
Jacobson, GA; McLean, S; Peterson, GM, 1997
)
0.3
" The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dose-response effects of racemic (+/-) salbutamol and its R(-) and S(+) isomers in terms of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics at extrapulmonary beta 2 adrenoceptors when given by the inhaled route to healthy volunteers."( Pharmacokinetics and extrapulmonary beta 2 adrenoceptor activity of nebulised racemic salbutamol and its R and S isomers in healthy volunteers.
Arbeeny, C; Clark, DJ; Koch, P; Lipworth, BJ, 1997
)
0.3
" This method was applied to evaluate the enantioselective release of salbutamol and taking into account the hypothesis that one enantiomer of a chiral drug would be released faster than the other from a pharmaceutical dosage form containing a racemic drug and a chiral excipient."( Determination of salbutamol enantiomers by high-performance capillary electrophoresis and its application to dissolution assays.
Calvo, B; Esquisabel, A; Gascón, AR; Hernández, RM; Igartua, M; Pedraz, JL, 1997
)
0.3
"5%) in matched normal subjects, but had no effect on TLCO and KCO in EH patients prior to TS; and (2) subsequent inhalation of the beta 2-adrenoreceptor agonist salbutamol in a dosage suspected to cause alveolar beta-receptor stimulation had no effect on TLCO and KCO, neither in the normal subjects, nor in EH patients (before and after TS)."( Partial pulmonary sympathetic denervation by thoracoscopic D2-D3 sympathicolysis for essential hyperhidrosis: effect on the pulmonary diffusion capacity.
Noppen, MM; Vincken, WG, 1997
)
0.3
" A dose-response curve (DRC) for systemic beta2-responses to inhaled salbutamol (800 to 3,200 microg) was constructed before and after each treatment period (ie, FM + PL or FM + PRED)."( Concomitant administration of low-dose prednisolone protects against in vivo beta2-adrenoceptor subsensitivity induced by regular formoterol.
Lipworth, BJ; McFarlane, LC; Tan, KS, 1998
)
0.3
" This study assesses the effect of long-term beta2-agonist dosing on cardiac beta-adrenoceptors."( Effect of long-term beta2-agonist dosing on human cardiac beta-adrenoceptor expression in vivo: comparison with changes in lung and mononuclear leukocyte beta-receptors.
Hayes, MJ; Hughes, JM; Ind, PW; Jones, T; Qing, F; Rahman, SU; Rhodes, CG,
)
0.13
"Serum sex hormones, lymphocyte beta2-adrenoceptor parameters, and bronchodilator and systemic dose-response curves (DRCs) to albuterol (Salbutamol) (100 to 1,600 microg) were measured at both on and off periods."( Beta2-adrenoceptor regulation and function in female asthmatic patients receiving the oral combined contraceptive pill.
Lipworth, BJ; McFarlane, LC; Tan, KS, 1998
)
0.51
"At weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12, spirometry was performed predose and serially over 6 h after dosing with study drug."( Proventil HFA provides bronchodilation comparable to ventolin over 12 weeks of regular use in asthmatics.
Bleecker, ER; Colice, GL; Ekholm, BP; Klinger, NM; Ramsdell, J; Slade, HB; Tinkelman, DG, 1998
)
0.3
" Vital signs were recorded over 6 h after dosing with study drug at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12."( Proventil HFA and ventolin have similar safety profiles during regular use.
Bleecker, ER; Colice, GL; Ekholm, BP; Klinger, NM; Ramsdell, J; Slade, HB; Tinkelman, DG, 1998
)
0.3
" Changes in heart rate and BP were small after dosing with study drug and tended to be similar for the active treatments and HFA-134a placebo groups."( Proventil HFA and ventolin have similar safety profiles during regular use.
Bleecker, ER; Colice, GL; Ekholm, BP; Klinger, NM; Ramsdell, J; Slade, HB; Tinkelman, DG, 1998
)
0.3
" A dosage of 16 puffs per day of propellant HFA-134a was well tolerated by asthmatics."( Proventil HFA and ventolin have similar safety profiles during regular use.
Bleecker, ER; Colice, GL; Ekholm, BP; Klinger, NM; Ramsdell, J; Slade, HB; Tinkelman, DG, 1998
)
0.3
"A dose-response increase in pulmonary function was found, but only 70% improved sufficiently to be discharged."( Therapeutic response patterns to high and cumulative doses of salbutamol in acute severe asthma.
Rodrigo, C; Rodrigo, G, 1998
)
0.3
" Lymphocyte beta2-adrenoceptor parameters and a dose-response curve to inhaled albuterol (200 to 1600 microg) were evaluated at 36 hours after the last dose of each treatment period."( Beta2-adrenoceptor regulation and bronchodilator sensitivity after regular treatment with formoterol in subjects with stable asthma.
Aziz, I; Hall, IP; Lipworth, BJ; McFarlane, LC, 1998
)
0.53
"There were no significant differences in the mean values for albuterol dose-response effects among the three treatment regimens."( Beta2-adrenoceptor regulation and bronchodilator sensitivity after regular treatment with formoterol in subjects with stable asthma.
Aziz, I; Hall, IP; Lipworth, BJ; McFarlane, LC, 1998
)
0.54
"1 microM), both caused rightward shifts in the dose-response curve for the inhibition of histamine release by isoprenaline."( Salmeterol inhibition of mediator release from human lung mast cells by beta-adrenoceptor-dependent and independent mechanisms.
Chong, LK; Cooper, E; Peachell, PT; Vardey, CJ, 1998
)
0.3
" Consistent in vitro fine particle dosing from the Diskus inhaler translates into a consistent clinical effect at low and high flow rates in children."( Clinical effect of Diskus dry-powder inhaler at low and high inspiratory flow-rates in asthmatic children.
Auk, IL; Bisgaard, H; Bojsen, K; Ifversen, M; Klug, B; Nielsen, KG, 1998
)
0.3
" Twice daily dosing may increase compliance with therapy."( A multicenter, placebo-controlled study of twice daily triamcinolone acetonide (800 microg per day) for the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.
Bernstein, DI; Cohen, R; Ginchansky, E; Pedinoff, AJ; Tinkelman, DG; Winder, JA, 1998
)
0.3
" The accuracy of dosing and the technically perfect use of devices are extremely important, especially when drugs with potential systemic side effects are administered."( Inhalation devices in childhood asthma.
Gács, E; Göndöcs, R; Jákly, A; Uhereczky, G, 1998
)
0.3
" Peak inspiratory flow (PIF) through Turbuhaler was measured on each dosing occasion."( Beta 2-agonists administered by a dry powder inhaler can be used in acute asthma.
Boe, J; Löfdahl, CG; Maranetra, N; Nana, A; Selroos, O; Ståhl, E; Youngchaiyud, P, 1998
)
0.3
"The aim of this study was to investigate whether regular treatment with inhaled salmeterol modifies the dose-response curve to the inhaled short-acting beta2-agonist terbutaline or affects the concentration of nitric oxide (NO) in exhaled air of children with asthma."( Effect of salmeterol treatment on nitric oxide level in exhaled air and dose-response to terbutaline in children with mild asthma.
Agertoft, L; Fuglsang, G; Pedersen, S; Vikre-Jørgensen, J, 1998
)
0.3
"We examined whether a pretreatment with formoterol, oxitropium bromide, or salmeterol might modify the dose-response curves to inhaled salbutamol in patients with stable and partially reversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)."( Effects of formoterol, salmeterol or oxitropium bromide on airway responses to salbutamol in COPD.
Calderaro, F; Cazzola, M; Di Perna, F; Girbino, G; Matera, MG; Noschese, P; Vinciguerra, A, 1998
)
0.3
" Concentrations of 1, 10 and 100 nM of BAAM caused dose-dependent rightward shifts in the dose-response curve for the isoprenaline inhibition of histamine release."( Influence of receptor reserve on beta-adrenoceptor-mediated responses in human lung mast cells.
Chong, LK; Drury, DE; Ghahramani, P; Peachell, PT, 1998
)
0.3
" PD20 FEV1 and dose-response slope [DRS; maximal change in FEV1 (%)/dose of Mch (mumol)] were used to evaluate efficacy."( The bronchoprotective efficacy of salbutamol inhaled from a new metered-dose powder inhaler compared with a conventional pressurized metered-dose inhaler connected to a spacer.
Alanko, K; Hedman, J; Herrala, J; Liipo, K; Nieminen, MM; Nyholm, JE; Pietinalho, A; Seppälä, OP; Terho, E, 1998
)
0.3
" The patients attended the laboratory during both treatment periods at 0730 hours, when a dose-response curve for systemic beta2-adrenoceptor responses to inhaled salbutamol (0."( Concomitant inhaled corticosteroid resensitises cardiac beta2-adrenoceptors in the presence of long-acting beta2-agonist therapy.
Aziz, I; Lipworth, BJ; McFarlane, LC, 1998
)
0.3
" The number of rescue medication inhaled, side effects, heart rate, blood pressure, serum potassium dosage and electrocardiograms, did no show significative differences between the groups."( [Efficacy of and tolerance to salmeterol compared to salbutamol in patients with bronchial asthma].
De Oliveira, MA; Faresin, SM; Jardim, JR; Lucas, SR; Nery, LE,
)
0.13
"This study showed that in mild to moderate asthmatic patients, salmeterol in the dosage of 100 mg/day raised the FEV1 and the morning PEF and led to pronounced decrease in the nocturnal symptoms as compared to salbutamol."( [Efficacy of and tolerance to salmeterol compared to salbutamol in patients with bronchial asthma].
De Oliveira, MA; Faresin, SM; Jardim, JR; Lucas, SR; Nery, LE,
)
0.13
" Assessment of 1-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1) curves before and after dosing on the last day of each 2-week period indicated that the combination was superior to either single agent in peak effect and area under the curve up to 8 h after dosing (FEV1-AUC0-8), in both phases of the trial."( Inhalation by nebulization of albuterol-ipratropium combination (Dey combination) is superior to either agent alone in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Dey Combination Solution Study Group.
Coleman, W; Gross, N; Linberg, S; Miller, R; Oren, J; Tashkin, D, 1998
)
0.59
" Pulmonary function and safety measures were assessed after each dosing interval."( Cumulative dose response study comparing HFA-134a albuterol sulfate and conventional CFC albuterol in patients with asthma.
Colice, GL; Ekholm, BP; Klinger, NM; Ramsdell, JW, 1998
)
0.55
"Recent studies have raised concern that regular inhalation of beta2 -agonists may cause a worsening of asthma control compared with on-demand dosing regimens."( Sustained bronchoprotection, bronchodilatation, and symptom control during regular formoterol use in asthma of moderate or greater severity. The Canadian FO/OD1 Study Group.
Brambilla, R; Chapman, KR; Della Cioppa, G; Fairbarn, MS; FitzGerald, JM; Stubbing, D; Till, MD, 1999
)
0.3
" Safety was assessed by measuring changes in pulse rate, blood pressure, and electrocardiogram (ECG) intervals after dosing with study drug, monitoring adverse events, and performing prestudy and poststudy laboratory testing and physical examinations."( Switching patients with asthma from chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) albuterol to hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) albuterol.
Bronsky, E; Colice, GL; Ekholm, BP; Klinger, NM, 1999
)
0.54
" HFA134a was rapidly absorbed after inhalation with dose-related blood concentrations which declined rapidly after dosing (t1/2 = 31 min)."( Clinical pharmacology of HFA134a.
Ventresca, GP, 1995
)
0.29
"Limited dose-response information is available for nebulized beta2 -agonists, especially in young children."( The safety and efficacy of nebulized levalbuterol compared with racemic albuterol and placebo in the treatment of asthma in pediatric patients.
DeGraw, SS; Gawchik, SM; Noonan, M; Reasner, DS; Saccar, CL, 1999
)
0.57
" Metered dosing (metered-dosing inhaler or premixed solution) were chosen by 22 caregivers (54%), calibrated measuring tools (droppers, syringes) by 15 (37%), and noncalibrated delivery devices (teaspoon) by 4 (10%)."( Caregiver knowledge and delivery of a commonly prescribed medication (albuterol) for children.
Simon, HK, 1999
)
0.54
"Metered dosing and calibrated measuring devices aided in the accurate delivery of this prescription medication."( Caregiver knowledge and delivery of a commonly prescribed medication (albuterol) for children.
Simon, HK, 1999
)
0.54
" Patients on inhaled corticosteroids, cromolyn, and nedocromil were allowed into the study if their dosing remained constant throughout the study."( Salmeterol vs theophylline: sleep and efficacy outcomes in patients with nocturnal asthma.
Mende, CN; Petrocella, VJ; Rickard, KA; Wiegand, L; Yancey, SW; Zaidel, G; Zwillich, CW, 1999
)
0.3
" Salmeterol, however, showed a flatter dose-response curve, and a significantly weaker maximal protective effect (2."( Comparison of the relative efficacy of formoterol and salmeterol in asthmatic patients.
Ibsen, T; Lötvall, J; Mellén, A; Palmqvist, M, 1999
)
0.3
"Current evidence suggests that addition of the long-acting beta2-agonist salmeterol to an inhaled corticosteroid in patients with persistent asthma symptoms provides greater clinical benefit than doubling the dosage of the inhaled corticosteroid."( Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination.
Jarvis, B; Spencer, CM, 1999
)
0.3
" Each agent was given in recommended dosage on separate days in a double-blind, crossover format, and the patients' arterial blood gases (ABGs) were measured at baseline and at intervals to 120 min."( Effects of salmeterol on arterial blood gases in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Comparison with albuterol and ipratropium.
Gross, NJ; Khoukaz, G, 1999
)
0.51
" Exercise challenge was repeated at day 3, week 4, and week 8 after randomization near the end of the dosing interval for both drugs."( Montelukast versus salmeterol in patients with asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Montelukast/Salmeterol Exercise Study Group.
Chuchalin, AG; Gunawardena, KA; Helbling, A; Jasan, J; Langley, SJ; Laurenzi, M; Lee, TH; Leff, JA; Menten, J; O'Neill, SJ; Suskovic, S; van Noord, JA; Villaran, C, 1999
)
0.3
"There were no differences between regular treatment with formoterol and salmeterol in their effects on lymphocyte beta2-adrenoceptor regulation at the end of a 12-h dosing interval, with both drugs exhibiting a residual degree of bronchodilator activity at the same time point."( Comparative trough effects of formoterol and salmeterol on lymphocyte beta2-adrenoceptor--regulation and bronchodilatation.
Aziz, I; Lipworth, BJ; McFarlane, LC, 1999
)
0.3
"We investigated the bronchodilator dose-response to nebulized albuterol and the dose of albuterol which produces maximal bronchodilation in the acutely ill, hospitalized asthmatic."( Dose-response characteristics of nebulized albuterol in the treatment of acutely ill, hospitalized asthmatics.
Brennan, K; Ciccolella, DE; Criner, GJ; Kelsen, SG, 1999
)
0.81
" Dose-response curves were compared using an analysis of covariance."( Tolerance to beta-agonists during acute bronchoconstriction.
Aldridge, RE; Cowan, JO; Flannery, EM; Hancox, RJ; Herbison, GP; McLachlan, CR; Taylor, DR; Town, GI, 1999
)
0.3
"6 microgram/kg) and aminophylline (25 mg/kg), which were determined by the dose-response curves for inhibition of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction, were intravenously administered 5 minutes before the propranolol inhalation."( Difference in bronchoprotective effects of bronchodilators on postallergic propranolol-induced bronchoconstriction.
Fujimura, M; Ishiura, Y; Matsuda, T; Mizuhashi, K; Myou, S, 1999
)
0.3
"Different mixed-effects models were compared to evaluate the population dose-response and relative potency of two albuterol inhalers."( Comparison of different methods to evaluate population dose-response and relative potency: importance of interoccasion variability.
Hill, MR; Kimanani, EK; Lalonde, RL; Ouellet, D; Potvin, D; Vaughan, LM, 1999
)
0.51
" A spacer device has been shown to further enhance the dosing characteristics."( A critical comparison of the dose delivery characteristics of four alternative inhalation devices delivering salbutamol: pressurized metered dose inhaler, Diskus inhaler, Diskhaler inhaler, and Turbuhaler inhaler.
Grant, AC; Prime, D; Slater, AL; Woodhouse, RN, 1999
)
0.3
" Two hours after inhalation a dose-response curve to inhaled oxitropium bromide (100 microg/puff) or placebo was constructed using one puff, one puff, two puffs, and two puffs-that is, a total cumulative dose of 600 microg oxitropium bromide."( Acute effect of pretreatment with single conventional dose of salmeterol on dose-response curve to oxitropium bromide in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Califano, C; Cazzola, M; Centanni, S; D'Amato, G; D'Amato, M; Di Perna, F; Donner, CF, 1999
)
0.3
"This study shows that acute pretreatment with 50 microg salmeterol does not block the possibility of inducing more bronchodilation with an anticholinergic agent when a higher than normal dosage of the muscarinic antagonist is used."( Acute effect of pretreatment with single conventional dose of salmeterol on dose-response curve to oxitropium bromide in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Califano, C; Cazzola, M; Centanni, S; D'Amato, G; D'Amato, M; Di Perna, F; Donner, CF, 1999
)
0.3
" The t(max)of about 2 h reflected serial dosing rather than delayed absorption."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cumulative single doses of inhaled salbutamol enantiomers in asthmatic subjects.
DeGraw, S; Gumbhir-Shah, K; Jusko, WJ; Kellerman, DJ; Koch, P, 1999
)
0.3
" Twelve subjects would suffice for a cumulative dose-response study for bronchodilator bioequivalence."( Concepts of establishing clinical bioequivalence of chlorofluorocarbon and hydrofluoroalkane beta-agonists.
Parameswaran, K, 1999
)
0.3
"046], but was far lower following oral dosing [0."( Enantiomeric disposition of inhaled, intravenous and oral racemic-salbutamol in man--no evidence of enantioselective lung metabolism.
Dallow, N; Dow, J; Eynott, P; Milleri, S; Ventresca, GP; Ward, JK, 2000
)
0.31
" Patients received treatments each for 2 weeks followed by a bolus (IV/inhaled) of corticosteroid or placebo: (1) placebo inhaler bid + bolus placebo; (2) formoterol Turbuhaler 24 microg metered dosage bid (delivered dosage 18 microg bid) + placebo; (3) formoterol 24 microg bid + bolus IV hydrocortisone, 200 mg; or (4) formoterol 24 microg bid + bolus inhaled budesonide, 1,600 microg."( Bronchodilator response to albuterol after regular formoterol and effects of acute corticosteroid administration.
Aziz, I; Lipworth, BJ, 2000
)
0.6
" Long-term administration of montelukast provided consistent inhibition of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction at the end of the 8-week dosing interval without tolerance."( Oral montelukast compared with inhaled salmeterol to prevent exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. A randomized, double-blind trial. Exercise Study Group.
Bronsky, EA; DeLucca, PT; Edelman, JM; Ghannam, AF; Gormley, GJ; Grossman, J; Kemp, JP; Pearlman, DS; Turpin, JA, 2000
)
0.31
" However, these studies were conducted in patients with stable asthma (at the top of the dose-response curve), whereas a nebulized bronchodilator most likely would be used by patients with an acute exacerbation."( Levalbuterol nebulizer solution: is it worth five times the cost of albuterol?
Asmus, MJ; Hendeles, L, 2000
)
0.93
" A new propellant, hydrofluoroalkane (HFA), incorporates a re-engineered delivery system associated with dosing reproducibility throughout the life of the canister."( Use of hydrofluoroalkane propellant delivery system for inhaled albuterol in patients receiving asthma medications.
Boccuzzi, SJ; Roehm, JB; Wogen, J, 2000
)
0.55
" This improvement in dosing characteristics has the potential to translate into enhanced economic outcomes."( Use of hydrofluoroalkane propellant delivery system for inhaled albuterol in patients receiving asthma medications.
Boccuzzi, SJ; Roehm, JB; Wogen, J, 2000
)
0.55
" Depending on the intensity of allergen exposure, complaints now occur in February/March only, requiring updating of the therapy in respect of dosage and number of drugs used."( [Two out-of-the-ordinary (?) case reports an asthmatic disease].
Hausen, T, 2000
)
0.31
" As opposed to data from an adult population, no plateau was reached in the dose-response curve using the above doses over time."( Is nebulized aerosol treatment necessary in the pediatric emergency department?
Gilad, E; Houri, S; Mandelberg, A; Morag, B; Priel, IE; Tsehori, S, 2000
)
0.31
"To test the lower range of the dose-response curve, effects of MF delivered by dry powder inhaler (DPI) on AMP-induced bronchoconstriction were compared with those of placebo."( Mometasone furoate antagonizes AMP-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with mild asthma.
Arshad, H; Harrison, JE; Holgate, ST; Stryszak, P, 2000
)
0.31
" Ratios of PCwheeze between treatment and placebo challenges were calculated for each dosage group."( The bronchoprotective effect of inhaled salmeterol in preschool children: a dose-ranging study.
Brown, R; Efthimiou, J; Kurian, M; Primhak, RA; Smith, CM; Wach, R; Yong, SC, 1999
)
0.3
" In contrast to benzalkonium chloride, the dose-response curves for secretostatic and celltoxic effects of salmeterol markedly overlapped."( Influence of salmeterol and benzalkonium chloride on G-protein-mediated exocytotic responses of rat peritoneal mast cells.
Krebs, D; Seebeck, J; Ziegler, A, 2000
)
0.31
"Our purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of fluticasone propionate powder 200 microg/d administered as a once- or twice-daily dosage regimen in patients who were currently being treated with bronchodilators only (BD patients) and in patients who required inhaled corticosteroids for maintenance treatment of asthma (ICS patients)."( Comparison of once- and twice-daily dosing of fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms per day administered by diskus device in patients with asthma treated with or without inhaled corticosteroids.
Duke, S; Grady, J; Harding, S; Munk, ZM; Prillaman, B; Rooklin, A; Stevens, A; Wolfe, J, 2000
)
0.31
" Subsequent experiments under prazosin treatment established the apoptosis dose-response curves for the increasingly beta(2)-selective AR agonists isoproterenol (ISO) (beta(1) approximately beta(2)) and albuterol (ALB) (beta(2)>beta(1))."( Beta-adrenergic receptor subtypes differentially affect apoptosis in adult rat ventricular myocytes.
Jamali, NZ; Lucchinetti, E; Shafiq, SA; Siddiqui, MA; Xu, W; Zaugg, M, 2000
)
0.49
" Mean maximum (or minimum) absolute values were used to construct dose-response curves to calculate the relative dose potency of the two drugs."( Systemic effects of formoterol and salmeterol: a dose-response comparison in healthy subjects.
Bennett, J; Cooper, S; Guhan, AR; Lewis, S; Oborne, J; Tattersfield, AE, 2000
)
0.31
" Each of the products provided an emitted dose which was within +/- 25% of the mean value indicating accurate and consistent dosing (93, 112 and 221 microg per metered dose for the salbutamol 100 microg and fluticasone propionate 125 and 250 microg HFA 134a pMDIs, respectively)."( Pharmaceutical transition to non-CFC pressurized metered dose inhalers.
Cripps, A; Riebe, M; Schulze, M; Woodhouse, R, 2000
)
0.31
" No dose-response effect or clinically relevant differences were observed in morning plasma cortisol concentrations or after cosyntropin stimulation."( A dose-ranging study of fluticasone propionate administered once daily via multidose powder inhaler to patients with moderate asthma.
Finn, A; Harding, SM; Jones, R; Li, JT; Nathan, RA; Payne, JE; Wolford, JP, 2000
)
0.31
" When comparing the two active dosing regimens, significant differences in favor of twice-daily dosing were noted in FEV(1), albuterol use, and withdrawal due to lack of efficacy."( Long-term efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate powder administered once or twice daily via inhaler to patients with moderate asthma.
Adelglass, J; Clifford, DP; Duke, SP; Faris, M; Harding, SM; Wire, PD; ZuWallack, R, 2000
)
0.51
"Fluticasone propionate powder improved lung function when administered either qd or bid over a 1-year period to patients with moderate asthma, with twice-daily dosing demonstrating significantly greater improvement in some efficacy parameters than once-daily dosing over the first 12 weeks of treatment."( Long-term efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate powder administered once or twice daily via inhaler to patients with moderate asthma.
Adelglass, J; Clifford, DP; Duke, SP; Faris, M; Harding, SM; Wire, PD; ZuWallack, R, 2000
)
0.31
"Our results showed no difference between formoterol and salmeterol in the degree of functional antagonism against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction at the end of a 12-h dosing interval in patients who expressed the homozygous glycine-16 genotype."( Functional antagonism with formoterol and salmeterol in asthmatic patients expressing the homozygous glycine-16 beta(2)-adrenoceptor polymorphism.
Aziz, I; Dempsey, OJ; Lipworth, BJ, 2000
)
0.31
"Homozygous Arg-16 patients are susceptible to clinically important increases in asthma exacerbations during chronic dosing with the short acting beta(2) agonist salbutamol."( Asthma exacerbations during long term beta agonist use: influence of beta(2) adrenoceptor polymorphism.
Drazen, JM; Hancox, RJ; Herbison, GP; Taylor, DR; Town, GI; Yandava, CN, 2000
)
0.31
" Urine was also obtained from subjects who had received the maximum dosage of inhaled salbutamol advisable for competing athletes to provide protection from exercise-induced asthma and treatment of asthma (1600 microgram in 24 h, 800 microgram being in the last 4 h)."( Discrimination of prohibited oral use of salbutamol from authorized inhaled asthma treatment.
Bergés, R; de La Torre, X; Farré, M; Fitch, KD; Mas, M; Morton, AR; Segura, J; Ventura, R, 2000
)
0.31
"The safety and efficacy of two once daily dosing regimens (200 microg and 400 microg) of mometasone furoate (MF) administered in the morning by using a dry-powder inhaler (DPI) were compared with those of a twice daily dosing regimen (200 microg administered twice daily) in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma previously taking only inhaled beta(2)-adrenergic agonists."( Mometasone furoate administered once daily is as effective as twice-daily administration for treatment of mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.
Berkowitz, RB; Harrison, JE; Kemp, JP; Miller, SD; Murray, JJ; Nolop, K, 2000
)
0.31
" The dose-response curve for L-750355-induced glycerolemia lies to the left of that for tachycardia."( L-750355, a human beta3-adrenoceptor agonist; in vitro pharmacology and profile of activity in vivo in the rhesus monkey.
Bach, T; Candelore, MR; Cascieri, MA; Cioffe, C; Deng, L; Fisher, MH; Forrest, MJ; Hegarty-Friscino, B; Hom, G; MacIntyre, E; Marko, O; Ok, HO; Strader, C; Szumiloski, J; Tota, L; Vicario, P; Weber, AE; Wyvratt, M, 2000
)
0.31
"The present study was designed to evaluate the bronchodilating role of zafirlukast, a CysLT(1)receptor antagonist, at the standard dosage currently recommended in the marketing of this agent in smokers with COPD."( Lung function improvement in smokers suffering from COPD with zafirlukast, a CysLT(1)-receptor antagonist.
Allegra, L; Boveri, B; Carlucci, P; Cazzola, M; Centanni, S; DiMarco, F; Santus, P, 2000
)
0.31
" At each visit, a dose-response curve to inhaled salbutamol was constructed using a total cumulative dose of 800 microg."( Additive effects of salmeterol and fluticasone or theophylline in COPD.
Calderaro, F; Cazzola, M; Centanni, S; Di Lorenzo, G; Di Perna, F; Testi, R, 2000
)
0.31
"5 mg albuterol by jet nebulization in a dosing schedule determined by the ACA phase."( Ipratropium bromide plus nebulized albuterol for the treatment of hospitalized children with acute asthma.
Craven, D; Golonka, G; Kercsmar, CM; Moore, S; Myers, TR; O'riordan, MA, 2001
)
1.1
" This dosage is also as effective when added to low-dosage inhaled corticosteroid therapy as doubling of corticosteroid dosages."( Zafirlukast: an update of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in asthma.
Dunn, CJ; Goa, KL, 2001
)
0.31
" Dosing continued on the evening of day 10 and on day 11, and on day 12 the effect of repeat-dose treatment with salmeterol and salmeterol/fluticasone propionate on the systemic effects of cumulative doses of inhaled salbutamol (up to a total dosage of 3,200 microg) was evaluated."( Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate given as a combination. Lack of systemic pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions.
Daniel, MJ; Falcoz, C; Kirby, S; Milleri, S; Squassante, L; Ventresca, GP; Ziviani, L,
)
0.13
" For fluticasone propionate, there were no statistically significant differences between salmeterol/fluticasone propionate and fluticasone propionate with respect to Cmax, plasma concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Ct), terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) or time to Cmax (tmax)."( Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate given as a combination. Lack of systemic pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions.
Daniel, MJ; Falcoz, C; Kirby, S; Milleri, S; Squassante, L; Ventresca, GP; Ziviani, L,
)
0.13
" WCV for the area under dose-response curve (AUC) for absolute blood flow was 18% and 13% for acetylcholine and albuterol, respectively."( Assessment of forearm vasodilator responses to acetylcholine and albuterol by strain gauge plethysmography: reproducibility and influence of strain gauge placement.
Chowienczyk, PJ; Jackson, G; Ritter, JM; Walker, HA, 2001
)
0.76
" The long duration of action of salmeterol offers the advantage of twice daily dosing compared with the required four times a day dosing with ipratropium."( Use of a long-acting inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist, salmeterol xinafoate, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Anderson, W; Bailey, W; Broughton, J; Friedman, M; Rennard, SI; Rickard, K; Wisniewski, M; ZuWallack, R, 2001
)
0.31
" Dose-response curves for change in FEV1 with salbutamol were compared using analysis of covariance to take account of methacholine-induced changes in spirometry."( Reversing acute bronchoconstriction in asthma: the effect of bronchodilator tolerance after treatment with formoterol.
Cowan, JO; Flannery, EM; Hancox, RJ; Herbison, GP; Jones, SL; Taylor, DR, 2001
)
0.31
" The primary end point was mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) measured 5 minutes after dosing and entered in a patient diary each day during the first 4 weeks of treatment."( Comparison of the efficacy of formoterol and salmeterol in patients with reversible obstructive airway disease: a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial.
Condemi, JJ, 2001
)
0.31
" In a patient subset with severe asthma, a dose-response relationship was observed for levalbuterol, indicating that higher doses were more effective."( Low-dose levalbuterol in children with asthma: safety and efficacy in comparison with placebo and racemic albuterol.
Baumgartner, RA; Bensch, G; Claus, R; Kim, KT; Milgrom, H; Skoner, DP, 2001
)
0.91
" These results indicate that the difference in FPM does not warrant a change in the recommended dosage of salmeterol administered when using the VHCs tested."( Evaluation of particle size distribution of salmeterol administered via metered-dose inhaler with and without valved holding chambers.
Ahrens, RC; Garris, T; Holmes, M; Kelly, HW; Reisner, C; Stevens, AL; Vandermeer, AK, 2001
)
0.31
" The difference in percent change in FEV1 between the Taifun and the other devices was statistically significant at the two first dose levels, but diminished towards the higher doses when the plateau of the dose-response curve was reached."( The efficacy of a new salbutamol metered-dose powder inhaler in comparison with two other inhaler devices.
Aalto, E; Hakonen, T; Jouhikainen, T; Liipp, K; Lukkari-Lax, E; Nieminen, MM; Seppälä, OR, 2001
)
0.31
" The retention of water within recently crystallised salbutamol is potentially important to the behaviour of dosage forms containing the amorphous (or partially amorphous) form of this drug."( A study of the crystallisation of amorphous salbutamol sulphate using water vapour sorption and near infrared spectroscopy.
Buckton, G; Columbano, A; Wikeley, P, 2002
)
0.31
"A dose-response curve to formoterol via Turbuhaler or salbutamol via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) was constructed."( Formoterol as dry powder oral inhalation compared with salbutamol metered-dose inhaler in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Calderaro, E; Califano, C; Cazzola, M; D'Amato, G; D'Amato, M; Di Perna, F; Matera, MG, 2002
)
0.31
"This study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of single doses of albuterol/HFA 134a with albuterol/CFC and to demonstrate a dose-response among the different doses of both formulations."( A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of single doses of HFA 134a albuterol and CFC albuterol in mild-to-moderate asthmatic patients.
Batty, EP; Langley, SJ; Masterson, CM; Sykes, AP; Woodcock, A, 2002
)
0.77
" Triplicate measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) were made immediately before dosing and 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours postdose."( A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of single doses of HFA 134a albuterol and CFC albuterol in mild-to-moderate asthmatic patients.
Batty, EP; Langley, SJ; Masterson, CM; Sykes, AP; Woodcock, A, 2002
)
0.55
" There were significant differences in T(max) and AUC0-20 min between the two dosage forms."( Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of salbutamol metered-dose inhaler in healthy volunteers.
Du, XL; Fu, Q; Li, DK; Xu, WB; Zhu, Z, 2002
)
0.31
" The new device, Airmax, uses proprietary technologies known as the X-ACT system to provide accurate and consistent dosing and excellent lung deposition--even at low inspiratory flow rates--combined with ease of use by the patient."( Delivery of salbutamol and of budesonide from a novel multi-dose inhaler Airmax.
Colledge, J; Jones, S; O'Leary, D; Phelan, M; Zeng, XM, 2002
)
0.31
" A bivariate dose-response model based on these principles was fitted simultaneously to all data."( Relative therapeutic index between inhaled formoterol and salbutamol in asthma patients.
Böcskei, C; Juhász, G; Larsson, R; Poczi, M; Rosenborg, J; Rott, Z, 2002
)
0.31
" Each study phase was separated by 7 days and the order of dosing was randomized."( Determination of the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lungs and systemic circulation following nebulization.
Chrystyn, H; Corlett, SA; Silkstone, VL, 2002
)
0.31
") excretion of salbutamol plus its metabolite over 24 h post ORAL, MDI, NEB and NEBC dosing was 297."( Determination of the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lungs and systemic circulation following nebulization.
Chrystyn, H; Corlett, SA; Silkstone, VL, 2002
)
0.31
" A bivariate dose-response model based on these principles was fitted simultaneously to all data."( Assessment of a relative therapeutic index between inhaled formoterol and salbuterol in asthma patients.
Böcskei, C; Juhász, G; Larsson, P; Poczi, M; Rosenborg, J; Rott, Z, 2002
)
0.54
" Cumulative dose-response curves (200, 400, 800 and 1600 microg) were constructed."( Metal versus plastic spacers: an in vitro and in vivo comparison.
Ekkelenkamp, MB; Janssen, R; Lammers, JW; Weda, M; Zanen, P, 2002
)
0.31
" Unfortunately the most effective dosage of beta2-agonists may increase above that recommended during acute exacerbations."( Acute effects of higher than customary doses of salmeterol and salbutamol in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD.
Califano, C; Cazzola, M; D'Amato, G; D'Amato, M; Di Perna, F; Marsico, SA; Matera, MG; Terzano, C, 2002
)
0.31
"In an effort to develop a sensitive method to document bioequivalence, bronchoprovocation with methacholine chloride was used to assess the dose-response relationship of albuterol as delivered by MDI."( A methacholine challenge dose-response study for development of a pharmacodynamic bioequivalence methodology for albuterol metered- dose inhalers.
Adams, WP; Creticos, PS; Khattignavong, AP; Lewis, LD; Lietman, PS; Martinez, MN; Molzon, JA; Petty, BG; Singh, GJ; Williams, RL, 2002
)
0.72
"The methacholine bronchoprovocation model is safe and useful in the study of albuterol MDI dose-response in asthmatic subjects."( A methacholine challenge dose-response study for development of a pharmacodynamic bioequivalence methodology for albuterol metered- dose inhalers.
Adams, WP; Creticos, PS; Khattignavong, AP; Lewis, LD; Lietman, PS; Martinez, MN; Molzon, JA; Petty, BG; Singh, GJ; Williams, RL, 2002
)
0.75
"Systemic corticosteroids and inhaled beta(2) agonists are accepted first line treatments for acute severe asthma, but there is no consensus on their optimum dosage and frequency of administration."( Randomised pragmatic comparison of UK and US treatment of acute asthma presenting to hospital.
Daynes, TJ; Harrison, BD; Innes, NJ; Stocking, JA, 2002
)
0.31
" The dose-response curve to isoproterenol in naive sphincters or sphincters pre-treated with atropine indicated that muscarinic blockade decreased the EC(50) rather than potentiated maximal beta-adrenergic relaxation."( Muscarinic blockers potentiate beta-adrenergic relaxation of bovine iris sphincter.
Barilan, A; Geyer, O; Nachman-Rubinstein, R; Oron, Y, 2003
)
0.32
"To prepare and evaluate a suppository dosage form of salbutamol sulfate."( Salbutamol sulfate suppositories: influence of formulation on physical parameters and stability.
Kassem, AA; Khan, MA; Taha, EI; Zaghloul, AA, 2003
)
0.32
"Rectal suppository of salbutamol sulfate could be prepared as an alternative to the oral dosage form to circumvent the first-pass metabolism."( Salbutamol sulfate suppositories: influence of formulation on physical parameters and stability.
Kassem, AA; Khan, MA; Taha, EI; Zaghloul, AA, 2003
)
0.32
" Significant benefit was gained from adding salmeterol in a group of patients who appeared to have been at the top of their steroid dose-response curve receiving FP250."( Addition of salmeterol to fluticasone propionate treatment in moderate-to-severe asthma.
Browning, D; Colman, NC; Dal Negro, R; Fletcher, CP; Ind, PW; James, MH, 2003
)
0.32
"To determine the magnitude of residual bronchoprotection after chronic dosing with long-acting beta(2)-agonists."( Airway-stabilizing effect of long-acting beta2-agonists as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids.
Currie, GP; Jackson, CM; Lipworth, BJ; Ogston, SA, 2003
)
0.32
"Three different methods developed for the determination of salbutamol sulfate (SBS), in pure drug form and in dosage forms, are discussed."( Three useful bromimetric methods for the determination of salbutamol sulfate.
Basavaiah, K; Prameela, HC, 2003
)
0.32
" These findings suggest that ways need to be found: (i) to increase the use of current asthma management guidelines by practitioners; (ii) to improve documentation of prescribed medications and their dosage and; (iii) to improve education of parents in home management measures."( Prescribing for asthmatic children in primary care. Are we following guidelines?
Dashash, NA; Mukhtar, SH, 2003
)
0.32
"To determine the reproducibility and dose-response relationship for urinary salbutamol excretion post inhalation."( Dose-response relationship and reproducibility of urinary salbutamol excretion during the first 30 min after an inhalation.
Chrystyn, H; Corlett, SA; Tomlinson, HS, 2003
)
0.32
"The cumulative dose-response study compared the biological effects (pulmonary function, respiratory muscle function, systemic effects) of an equal dose of salbutamol delivered via four different devices in 23 patients with asthma and 21 patients with moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)."( Does the inhalation device affect the bronchodilatory dose response curve of salbutamol in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients?
Broeders, ME; Folgering, HT; Hop, WC; Molema, J; Vermue, NA, 2003
)
0.32
" Dose-response curves (DRC) were constructed with the following cumulative doses of salbutamol: 200 microg, 600 microg (200 microg + 400 microg), 1400 microg (600microg + 800 microg) ad 2600 microg (1400 + 1200 microg)."( Comparison of the extrapulmonary beta2-adrenoceptor responses and pharmacokinetics of salbutamol given by standard metered dose-inhaler and modified actuator device.
Lipworth, BJ; McDevitt, DG; Newnham, DM, 1993
)
0.29
" Dose-response curves showed that Salm, at concentration >1."( Cytokine release and adhesion molecule expression by stimulated human bronchial epithelial cells are downregulated by salmeterol.
Di Blasi, P; Rossi, GA; Sabatini, F; Sale, R; Serpero, L; Silvestri, M, 2003
)
0.32
" This randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, crossover study investigated the efficacy, dose-response and safety of HFA-albuterol delivered via a breath-actuated Autohaler inhalation device in comparison with the same medication delivered using a conventional P&B device."( Efficacy response of inhaled HFA-albuterol delivered via the breath-actuated Autohaler inhalation device is comparable to dose in patients with asthma.
Cohen, RM; Gross, G; Guy, H, 2003
)
0.81
" No significant correlations were found between FP dosage and height SDS, OC, AKP, IGFBP-3, and SC."( Effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate in children less than 2 years old with recurrent wheezing.
Bergadá, I; Colom, AJ; Kofman, CD; Maffey, AF; Teper, AM; Vidaurreta, SM, 2004
)
0.32
"if patients with asthma remain symptomatic in spite of chronic treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), increasing the ICS dosage or adding another drug to the treatment regimen are possible therapeutic alternatives."( Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/250 microg) combination is superior to double dose fluticasone (500 microg) for the treatment of symptomatic moderate asthma.
Bergmann, KC; Braun, R; Lindemann, L; Steinkamp, G, 2004
)
0.32
"5 microg) according to asthma severity compared with traditional fixed dosing (FD) regimens."( Adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol compared with fixed-dose salmeterol/fluticasone in moderate to severe asthma.
Aalbers, R; Backer, V; Jorup, C; Kava, TT; Omenaas, ER; Sandström, T; Welte, T, 2004
)
0.32
"5, mean inhaled corticosteroids 735 microg/day, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)] 84% predicted) were randomised after 2 weeks' run-in to either: budesonide/formoterol adjustable maintenance dosing (AMD), budesonide/formoterol FD or salmeterol/fluticasone (Seretide Diskus dagger 50/250 microg) FD."( Adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol compared with fixed-dose salmeterol/fluticasone in moderate to severe asthma.
Aalbers, R; Backer, V; Jorup, C; Kava, TT; Omenaas, ER; Sandström, T; Welte, T, 2004
)
0.32
"Adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol provides more effective asthma control by reducing exacerbations and reliever medication usage compared with fixed-dose salmeterol/fluticasone."( Adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol compared with fixed-dose salmeterol/fluticasone in moderate to severe asthma.
Aalbers, R; Backer, V; Jorup, C; Kava, TT; Omenaas, ER; Sandström, T; Welte, T, 2004
)
0.32
"Since beta1-blockade by nebivolol is larger after repeated dosing than after a single oral intake, we have explored its effect on pulmonary function after a 2-week treatment in hypertensive patients with mild to moderate COPD."( Comparative effects of a two-week treatment with nebivolol and nifedipine in hypertensive patients suffering from COPD.
Cazzola, M; Girbino, G; Matera, MG; Ruggeri, P; Sanduzzi, A; Spicuzza, L; Vatrella, A,
)
0.13
" The effect on dispersion efficiency of jet velocity, nozzle location, reservoir size and shape, and the loaded dose is investigated for possible design of new dosing methods or inhalers."( Use of an impinging jet for dispersion of dry powder inhalation aerosols.
Finlay, WH; Lange, CF; Wang, Z, 2004
)
0.32
" IC was recorded before dosing and at 5, 10, 15 and 30 min and 1, 2, 3 and 4 h post-dose."( Effects of formoterol and salmeterol on resting inspiratory capacity in COPD patients with poor FEV(1) reversibility.
Bouros, D; Della Cioppa, G; Kottakis, J; Le Gros, V; Overend, T; Siafakas, N, 2004
)
0.32
"To determine whether albuterol helps REX attenuate unloading-induced KE losses, two groups of subjects strength trained their left thigh three times per week, and otherwise refrained from ambulatory and weight-bearing activity for 40 d while receiving a capsule dosing treatment (albuterol, placebo) with no crossover."( Albuterol helps resistance exercise attenuate unloading-induced knee extensor losses.
Caruso, JF; Cook, TD; Elias, J; Hamill, JL; Keller, CP; Mercado, DR; Montgomery, AG; Yamauchi, M, 2004
)
2.09
" The in vivo performance of mucoadhesive microspheres formulations showed prolonged and controlled release of salbutamol as compared with oral administration of conventional dosage form."( Development and characterization of mucoadhesive microspheres bearing salbutamol for nasal delivery.
Chourasia, MK; Jain, AK; Jain, RK; Jain, SK; Shrivastava, AK,
)
0.13
" The nocturnal dose-response curve was shifted to the right."( Response to inhaled albuterol during nocturnal asthma.
Ahrens, R; Beaty, R; Harman, EM; Hendeles, L; Stevens, G, 2004
)
0.65
"The earlier described faster onset-of-action of formoterol as compared to a equipotent dosage of salmeterol was confirmed in this study."( Profiles of measured and perceived bronchodilation. A placebo-controlled cross-over trial comparing formoterol and salmeterol in moderate persistent asthma.
Creemers, JP; Greefhorst, AP; Hoff, WJ; Schermer, TR; Sips, AP; van Herwaarden, CL; Westbroek, J, 2004
)
0.32
"Recently, dry powder inhaler (DPI) was more available than pressure metered dosed inhaler (pMDI) for the inhalation therapy of the respiratory disease."( [Comparison of the bronchodilator effect of salbutamol between pressure metered dosed inhaler and dry powder inhaler in patients with stable bronchial asthma].
Fujimura, M; Kasahara, K; Nakao, S; Yasui, M; Yoshimi, Y, 2004
)
0.32
"Pulmonary function methods which are able to detect small pharmacological effects may be useful for assessing the full dose-response curve of bronchodilatators."( A comparison of lung function methods for assessing dose-response effects of salbutamol.
Houghton, CM; Singh, D; Woodcock, AA, 2004
)
0.32
" The once-a-day dosing and easy-to-use HandiHaler device should improve patient compliance."( Tiotropium: a new, long-acting agent for the management of COPD--a clinical review.
Crutchfield, D, 2004
)
0.32
" In the US, twice-daily salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/250 microg is approved for use in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) associated with chronic bronchitis, and in the EU, the twice-daily 50/500 microg dosage is approved for use in patients with severe COPD, repeat exacerbations and significant symptoms despite bronchodilator therapy."( Inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate: a review of its use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Fenton, C; Keating, GM, 2004
)
0.32
" DPIVM may allow significant financial savings in centers and hospital departments using high-cost pharmaceuticals susceptible of customized dosing --e."( [Financial assessment of device for the preparation of intravenous mixtures in hospital pharmacy].
Bonafont Pujol, X; Casado Collado, A; Clemente Bautista, S; Herdman, M; Jódar Masanés, R; Luengo Pascual, L; Napal Lecumberri, V; Serrano Padilla, G,
)
0.13
" The lack of differences in FEV(1) increases observed after 200 and 400 microg salbutamol may reflect attainment of the flat portion of the dose-response curve using either device."( Clinical and functional responses to salbutamol inhaled via different devices in asthmatic patients with induced bronchoconstriction.
Fontana, GA; Geri, P; Lavorini, F; Luperini, M; Maluccio, NM; Mariani, L; Marmai, C; Pistolesi, M, 2004
)
0.32
" Fixed dosing with budesonide/formoterol or salmeterol/fluticasone provides effective asthma control in line with guideline goals."( Combination therapy in asthma--fixed or variable dosing in different patients?
Lötvall, J, 2004
)
0.32
" However, in view of the steep bronchodilator dose-response curve for salbutamol, further studies are needed to determine whether such device care is clinically necessary."( Effect of mouthpiece washing on aerosol performance of CFC-free Ventolin.
Bosnic-Anticevich, SZ; Chan, HK; Chew, NY; Reddel, HK, 2004
)
0.32
" This study compared the dose-response of salbutamol delivered by the Aerodose Inhaler (Aerogen Inc."( Dose-response to salbutamol via a novel palm sized nebuliser (Aerodose Inhaler), conventional nebuliser (Pari LC Plus) and metered dose inhaler (Ventolin Evohaler) in moderate to severe asthmatics.
Cockburn, W; Fishman, R; Lipworth, BJ; Sims, EJ; Taylor, K, 2005
)
0.33
" Subjects performed left leg REX, which otherwise refrained from ambulatory and weight-bearing activity for 40 days, while randomized to a capsule (placebo, albuterol) dosing regimen with no crossover to note whether albuterol helps REX mitigate unloading-induced AE losses."( Albuterol aids resistance exercise in reducing unloading-induced ankle extensor strength losses.
Caruso, J; Cook, T; Elias, J; Hamill, J; Higginson, B; Mercado, D; O'Meara, S; Siconolfi, S; Yamauchi, M, 2005
)
1.97
" The efficacy, dosing flexibility, and improved side effect profile of levalbuterol were the sources of greatest satisfaction for parents/ caregivers in the levalbuterol group."( A patient satisfaction survey comparing levalbuterol with racemic albuterol in children.
Ames, DE; Berger, WE; Harrison, D,
)
0.62
" In most SFC patients the fluticasone dosage can be reduced by 50 % without losing asthma control."( [Asthma control with the salmeterol-fluticasone-combination disc compared to standard treatment].
Liefring, E; Molitor, S; Trautmann, M, 2005
)
0.33
" Oral absorption of swallowed albuterol was eliminated by oral dosing of 560 mg activated charcoal 1 h prior to albuterol aerosol administration."( The study of in vitro-in vivo correlation: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of albuterol dry powder inhalers.
Muanpanarai, D; Srichana, T; Suedee, R; Tanmanee, N, 2005
)
0.84
"Bronchodilator tolerance, assessed by a reduction of the area under the salbutamol dose-response curve, occurred after 1 dose of formoterol (28% reduction, 95% CI 12, 45%), increased up to 1 week and plateaued between 1 and 2 weeks (58% reduction, 95% CI 38, 78%)."( Rapid onset of tolerance to beta-agonist bronchodilation.
Hancox, RJ; Haney, S, 2005
)
0.33
"Greater clinical benefit in controlling the symptoms of asthma is frequently observed through combining moderate doses of inhaled glucocorticoids together with long-acting beta(2)-agonists, as compared with increasing glucocorticoid dosage alone."( Interleukin-10-secreting "regulatory" T cells induced by glucocorticoids and beta2-agonists.
Corrigan, CJ; Faith, A; Hawrylowicz, CM; Lavender, P; Lee, TH; Peek, EJ; Richards, DF, 2005
)
0.33
" Drug use in the 6 months before and after step-up in treatment from inhaled corticosteroids [ICs; total daily dosage of < or =1000 microg beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) or equivalent] to either salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (SFC) or concurrent BDP and long-acting beta(2)-agonists (LABAs) given in separate inhalers was compared."( Short-acting beta 2-agonist and oral corticosteroid use in asthma patients prescribed either concurrent beclomethasone and long-acting beta 2-agonist or salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination.
Angus, R; Cheesbrough, A; Reagon, R, 2005
)
0.33
" The addition of a low-dose long-acting beta(2) agonist is superior to the simple increase of the dosage of inhaled corticosteroids."( [Evaluation of the clinical efficacy and the safety of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate accuhaler compared to budesonide turbuhalar in the control of adult asthma].
Cai, BQ; Chen, BY; Chen, XD; Feng, YL; Guo, XJ; Kang, J; Li, Q; Lin, YP; Qiu, C; Shen, HH; Sun, TY; Tao, JJ; Wang, DQ; Xiao, BR; Xie, CM; Xu, YP; Yin, KS; Zhang, DP; Zheng, JP; Zhong, NS; Zhou, JY; Zhou, X, 2005
)
0.33
" Seventy-two hours after the last OVA challenge, guinea pigs were anesthetized and tracheostomized, respiratory system resistance and elastance were measured and a dose-response curve to inhaled methacholine chloride was obtained."( Effect of salbutamol on pulmonary responsiveness in chronic pulmonary allergic inflammation in guinea pigs.
Arantes-Costa, FM; Kasahara, DI; Lopes, FD; Martins, MA; Nunes, MP; Perini, A, 2005
)
0.33
"A patient-driven, adjustable maintenance dosing (AMD) approach to asthma therapy, in which the dose is adjusted by patients according to the severity of their symptoms, has recently been compared with fixed-dose therapy in open-label studies."( The CONCEPT trial: a 1-year, multicenter, randomized,double-blind, double-dummy comparison of a stable dosing regimen of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate with an adjustable maintenance dosing regimen of formoterol/budesonide in adults with persistent ast
Boulet, LP; FitzGerald, JM; Follows, RM, 2005
)
0.33
"This study used a double-blind, double-dummy design to compare the efficacy of 2 treatment approaches: stable dosing of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (SAL/FP) and AMD of formoterol/budesonide (FOR/BUD)."( The CONCEPT trial: a 1-year, multicenter, randomized,double-blind, double-dummy comparison of a stable dosing regimen of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate with an adjustable maintenance dosing regimen of formoterol/budesonide in adults with persistent ast
Boulet, LP; FitzGerald, JM; Follows, RM, 2005
)
0.33
" After 4 weeks of stable dosing in both groups, eligible patients continued the study for an additional 48 weeks, receiving either a stable dose of SAL/FP or AMD of FOR/BUD."( The CONCEPT trial: a 1-year, multicenter, randomized,double-blind, double-dummy comparison of a stable dosing regimen of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate with an adjustable maintenance dosing regimen of formoterol/budesonide in adults with persistent ast
Boulet, LP; FitzGerald, JM; Follows, RM, 2005
)
0.33
" Over weeks 1 through 52, patients receiving stable dosing of SAL/FP had a significantly greater percentage of symptom-free days compared with those receiving AMD of FOR/BUD (median, 58."( The CONCEPT trial: a 1-year, multicenter, randomized,double-blind, double-dummy comparison of a stable dosing regimen of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate with an adjustable maintenance dosing regimen of formoterol/budesonide in adults with persistent ast
Boulet, LP; FitzGerald, JM; Follows, RM, 2005
)
0.33
"In this adult population with persistent asthma, stable dosing of SAL/FP 50/250 microg BID resulted in significantly greater increases in symptom-free days, days free of rescue medication, and morning PEE, as well as almost halving the exacerbation rate, compared with AMD of FOR/BUD 6/200 microg."( The CONCEPT trial: a 1-year, multicenter, randomized,double-blind, double-dummy comparison of a stable dosing regimen of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate with an adjustable maintenance dosing regimen of formoterol/budesonide in adults with persistent ast
Boulet, LP; FitzGerald, JM; Follows, RM, 2005
)
0.33
" Dose-response curves were constructed based on FEV(1) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) recorded after each incremental dose."( A randomized controlled trial to assess the optimal dose and effect of nebulized albuterol in acute exacerbations of COPD.
Henry, MT; Nair, S; Pearson, SB; Thomas, E, 2005
)
0.55
" Over 97% of GPs ranked development of paediatric formulations and clearer dosage information more highly than clinical trials as a means to reducing off-label prescribing."( Off-label prescribing to children: attitudes and experience of general practitioners.
Ekins-Daukes, S; Helms, PJ; McLay, JS; Taylor, MW, 2005
)
0.33
"Our objective was to determine if nebulized racemic epinephrine is more efficacious than nebulized albuterol or saline placebo in the treatment of bronchiolitis in the outpatient setting when dosing is equivalent in terms of beta-2 agonist potency."( Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of albuterol and epinephrine at equipotent beta-2 agonist doses in acute bronchiolitis.
Anaya, T; Hartenberger, C; Kelly, HW; Qualls, C; Ralston, S, 2005
)
0.81
" From these data, acute salbutamol intake at therapeutical dosage did appear to improve peak power and mean power during a supramaximal exercise, but the mechanisms involved need further investigation."( Effects of acute salbutamol intake during a Wingate test.
Beaupied, H; Benhamou, L; Collomp, K; Courteix, D; De Ceaurriz, J; Jaffre, C; Le Panse, B; Lecoq, AM; Portier, H; Richard, O, 2005
)
0.33
" the dose-response curve of salbutamol on L-type calcium current was shifted to the higher concentration range and maximal increase in contraction force was diminished in human atrial cells."( Changes of beta2-adrenergic stimulation induced by hyperosmosis in human atrium.
Benetis, R; Gendviliene, V; Jurevicius, J; Kanaporis, G; Macianskiene, R; Skeberdis, VA; Zablockaite, D, 2005
)
0.33
" Dose-response curves were constructed based on skeletal and cardiac muscle hypertrophy."( Systemic administration of beta2-adrenoceptor agonists, formoterol and salmeterol, elicit skeletal muscle hypertrophy in rats at micromolar doses.
Lynch, GS; Ryall, JG; Sillence, MN, 2006
)
0.33
" Effective maintenance therapywith the correct dosage ofinhalational corticosteroids administered correctly can probably stop the potentially fatal asthma type II from developing."( [Fatal asthma in childhod preventable by recognizing risk factors and presenting features].
Corel, LJ; de Hoog, M; Joosten, KF; Tiddens, HA; Verbruggen, SC, 2006
)
0.33
" We theorized that this lack of demonstrable benefit resulted from variations in dosing and titration, rather than the drug per se, and that intensive care unit (ICU) LOS would be shortened by the administration of terbutaline according to a protocol incorporating a quantitative assessment of severity of illness."( Protocol-based titration of intravenous terbutaline decreases length of stay in pediatric status asthmaticus.
Carroll, CL; Schramm, CM, 2006
)
0.33
" The results highlight a more significant effect of inspiratory flow on variable dosage emission when using the Symbicort Turbuhaler compared with the Seretide Diskus."( Emitted dose estimates from Seretide Diskus and Symbicort Turbuhaler following inhalation by severe asthmatics.
Assi, KH; Chrystyn, H; Pearson, SB; Tarsin, WY, 2006
)
0.33
" According to the dose-response curve to methacholine, they were categorized as having either unlimited airway narrowing (UAN group) (n = 20) or response plateau (RP group) (n = 18)."( Dyspnea perception and reversibility of methacholine-induced unlimited airway narrowing in asthmatics.
Malakauskas, K; Sakalauskas, R; Sitkauskiene, B; Stravinskaite, K, 2006
)
0.33
"Response to salmeterol does not vary between ADRB2 genotypes after chronic dosing with an inhaled corticosteroid."( Salmeterol response is not affected by beta2-adrenergic receptor genotype in subjects with persistent asthma.
Anderson, WH; Baitinger, LA; Bleecker, ER; Dorinsky, PM; Edwards, LD; Klotsman, M; Yancey, SW, 2006
)
0.33
"The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the specific types of medication, length of use, frequency of use, and dosing time of day on the dental caries of children diagnosed with asthma."( A cross-sectional study of medication-related factors and caries experience in asthmatic children.
Chen, JW; Donovan, K; Lee, JY; Milano, M,
)
0.13
" The 95% CI exceeded the pre-determined margin of 100ml by 2 ml, so that the statistical hypothesis of non-inferiority of once daily dosing was not confirmed."( Once versus twice daily formoterol via Novolizer for patients with moderate to severe COPD--a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.
Hartmann, U; Metzenauer, P; Welte, T, 2008
)
0.35
"Based on a comparable efficacy and tolerability, the dosing schedule with formoterol via Novolizer as once daily in the morning seems to be an alternative compared to twice daily treatment."( Once versus twice daily formoterol via Novolizer for patients with moderate to severe COPD--a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.
Hartmann, U; Metzenauer, P; Welte, T, 2008
)
0.35
"R-albuterol (levalbuterol) is a drug used for asthma therapy and some formulations of it are in solid dosage forms."( Solid-state characterization of two polymorphic forms of R-albuterol sulfate.
Badini, R; Cuffini, S; Karlsson, A; Palacio, MA; Palacios, SM, 2007
)
1.3
" The strategy of adjustable maintenance dosing (AMD) involves adjustment of the maintenance dose, (using a single combination [budesonide/formoterol] inhaler, Symbicort((R))) in response to variability of asthma control over time."( Inhaled Glucocorticosteroid and Long-Acting beta(2)-Adrenoceptor Agonist Single-Inhaler Combination for Both Maintenance and Rescue Therapy : A Paradigm Shift in Asthma Management.
D'Urzo, AD, 2006
)
0.33
"We conducted a double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover study evaluating the effects of halving inhaled steroid dosage plus salmeterol, or salmeterol and tiotropium."( A proof of concept study to evaluate stepping down the dose of fluticasone in combination with salmeterol and tiotropium in severe persistent asthma.
Fardon, T; Haggart, K; Lee, DK; Lipworth, BJ, 2007
)
0.34
" Lactic acidosis improved within 24 h after discontinuation or decrease in the dosage of beta2-agonists."( Lactic acidosis in children with acute exacerbation of severe asthma.
Koul, PB; Minarik, M; Totapally, BR, 2007
)
0.34
" The results showed that the test dosage forms was bioequivalent with reference dosage form, and had an obviously pulsatile-release effect."( The investigation of the pharmacokinetics of pulsatile-release salbutamol sulfate with pH-sensitive ion exchange resin as the carriers in beagle dogs.
Guo, H; Liu, H; Pan, W; Sun, T; Yu, F; Zhao, X, 2007
)
0.34
"For similar systemic exposure, dosing should be adjusted to age or size but not on a fixed microg kg(-1) basis, which may lead to unnecessary suboptimal dosing."( Age dependent systemic exposure to inhaled salbutamol.
Bisgaard, H; Bønnelykke, K; Jespersen, JJ, 2007
)
0.34
") completely reversed the rightward shift of the formoterol dose-response curve due to beta(2)-receptor desensitisation."( Formoterol and beclomethasone dipropionate interact positively in antagonising bronchoconstriction and inflammation in the lung.
Bergamaschi, M; Berti, F; Bolzoni, P; Civelli, M; Razzetti, R; Rossoni, G; Villetti, G, 2007
)
0.34
" An increased frequency of dosing with these drugs seems preferable for cases of severe or uncontrolled asthma."( Optimization of dosing schedule of daily inhalant dexamethasone to minimize phase shifting of clock gene expression rhythm in the lungs of the asthma mouse model.
Hayasaka, N; Honma, K; Honma, S; Kudo, T; Kuwaki, T; Shibata, S; Yaita, T, 2007
)
0.34
" The aims of this study were to evaluate the long-term efficacy (including symptom-free days and exacerbations) and impact on HRQoL of a stable-dose regimen of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (SAL/FP) and an adjustable maintenance dosing (AMD) regimen of formoterol/budesonide (FOR/BUD) where treatment is adjusted based on symptoms [SAM40056]."( Salmeterol/fluticasone stable-dose treatment compared with formoterol/budesonide adjustable maintenance dosing: impact on health-related quality of life.
Price, DB; Williams, AE; Yoxall, S, 2007
)
0.34
"Transdermal beta 2-agonist tulobuterol showed an improvement in FEV1, FVC and IC after dosing compared with those at baseline."( Comparison of bronchodilatory properties of transdermal and inhaled long-acting beta 2-agonists.
Akamatsu, K; Hirano, T; Ichikawa, T; Ichinose, M; Matsunaga, K; Minakata, Y; Nakanishi, M; Sugiura, H; Ueshima, K; Yamagata, T; Yanagisawa, S, 2008
)
0.35
" At the baseline visit 2-6 days later, the provocative concentration of methacholine to induce a 30% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1) PC(30)) was determined, followed by a nebulized racemic albuterol dose-response study with three doses of albuterol, to familiarize patients with the procedures."( Comparison of the dose response to levalbuterol with and without pretreatment with S-albuterol after methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction.
Esparham, A; Harkins, M; Kelly, HW; Raissy, HH, 2007
)
0.8
"Electrostatic forces arising from charge accumulation on drug and excipient powders cause agglomeration and adhesion of particles to solid surfaces and problems during the manufacture and use of many pharmaceutical dosage forms, including dry powder inhalers (DPIs)."( The effect of relative humidity on electrostatic charge decay of drugs and excipient used in dry powder inhaler formulation.
Carter, P; Elajnaf, A; Rowley, G, 2007
)
0.34
" Studies have shown that a large volume spacer attached to a metered dose inhaler provides similar bronchodilator effects to nebulized dosing during the management of patients following an acute exacerbation."( Relative lung deposition of salbutamol following inhalation from a spacer and a Sidestream jet nebulizer following an acute exacerbation.
Chrystyn, H; Ismail, NE; Mazhar, SH; Newton, DA, 2008
)
0.35
" For patients in group A, a fixed dosage was maintained for 18 months, while those in group B received tailored dosage or withdrawal of therapy according to the clinical control level (well or total control)."( [A clinical study on the significance of airway hyperresponsiveness monitoring in the adjustment of combined therapy for asthmatic patients].
Liu, CT; Pang, YM; Tan, CW; Wang, G; Wang, YM, 2007
)
0.34
" Further studies are needed to elucidate the clinical benefit of combination inhalers versus the individual components in different inhalers, and to investigate the clinical benefit of flexible dosing of combination inhalers in patients with COPD."( Comparison and optimal use of fixed combinations in the management of COPD.
Aalbers, R; Mensing, M, 2007
)
0.34
"This study determined the dose-response effects of inhaled salbutamol (SAL) on time-trial performance and urine concentrations of SAL (cSAL)."( Dose response of inhaled salbutamol on exercise performance and urine concentrations.
McKenzie, DC; Sheel, AW; Sporer, BC, 2008
)
0.35
" The two FSC treatments were similar except that QD dosing did not maintain improvements in lung function for 24h compared with twice daily dosing."( Efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 mcg Diskus administered once daily.
Dorinsky, PM; Kerwin, EM; Meltzer, EO; Nathan, RA; Ortega, HG; Schoaf, L; Yancey, SW, 2008
)
0.35
" Few studies have explored the safety of at least 1 year of use of racemic albuterol, and none have examined long-term dosing of levalbuterol."( Long-term safety study of levalbuterol administered via metered-dose inhaler in patients with asthma.
Baumgartner, RA; D'Urzo, A; Hamilos, DL; Levy, RJ; Marcus, M; McVicar, WK; Parsey, M; Tripp, K, 2007
)
0.86
" Mean percentage of predicted FEV1 improved after dosing and was stable for both groups."( Long-term safety study of levalbuterol administered via metered-dose inhaler in patients with asthma.
Baumgartner, RA; D'Urzo, A; Hamilos, DL; Levy, RJ; Marcus, M; McVicar, WK; Parsey, M; Tripp, K, 2007
)
0.63
" The compression of these particles into tablets revealed that desirable controlled released dosage forms could be prepared."( Preparation of functional composite particles of salbutamol sulfate using a 4-fluid nozzle spray-drying technique.
Chen, R; Danjo, K; Okamoto, H, 2008
)
0.35
" Traditional press-and-breathe Metered Dose Inhalers (pMDIs) have recently improved their ecological appeal, can be used in every clinical and environmental situation, their dosing is convenient and highly reproducible, but their efficient delivery remains highly technique dependent."( Inhalatory therapy training: a priority challenge for the physician.
Melani, AS, 2007
)
0.34
" In severe to critical asthma, differences between sites were common and related to recommendations for: ipratropium use; metered-dose inhaler versus nebulised delivery of salbutamol in severe asthma; use of intravenous aminophylline, intravenous magnesium and dosing of intravenous salbutamol in critical asthma."( Paediatric acute asthma management in Australia and New Zealand: practice patterns in the context of clinical practice guidelines.
Acworth, J; Babl, FE; Borland, M; Cotterell, E; Francis, P; Jamison, S; Krieser, D; Neutze, J; Ngo, P; Schutz, J; Sheriff, N; Thomson, F, 2008
)
0.35
" Therefore, we infused salbutamol at a higher dosage (23."( Effect of salbutamol on respiratory muscle function and ventilation in awake canines.
Easton, PA; Holroyde, MC; Johnson, MW; Katagiri, M; Kusuhara, N; Rothwell, BC, 2008
)
0.35
"The present study was designed to examine the dose-response relationship of inhaled salbutamol and its concentration in the urine while resting at various times after inhalation, and to compare these values against the current World Anti-Doping Code limits."( Inhaled salbutamol and doping control: effects of dose on urine concentrations.
McKenzie, DC; Rupert, JL; Sheel, AW; Sporer, BC; Taunton, J, 2008
)
0.35
"The present study relates to enhancing the dosing efficiency of pharmaceutical dry powder formulations administered by pulmonary inhalation."( Techniques to develop and characterize nanosized formulation for salbutamol sulfate.
Ahmad, FJ; Bhatnagar, A; Khar, RK; Sultana, S, 2009
)
0.35
" During the 40-day period, subjects performed resistance exercise (REX) with their unloaded leg on an inertial resistance ergometer and, as part of a double-blind design, consumed the maximal oral therapeutic dosage of albuterol (i."( Temporal strength changes from resistance exercise and albuterol on unloaded muscle.
Caruso, JF; Cook, TD; Hamill, JL; Mercado, DR; Saito, K; Yamauchi, M, 2008
)
0.78
"The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guideline recommends that dosing racemic albuterol be administered every 1 to 4 hours for treating patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the hospital."( Comparison of levalbuterol and racemic albuterol in hospitalized patients with acute asthma or COPD: a 2-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label study.
Andrews, WT; Ciubotaru, RL; Claus, R; Donohue, JF; Hanania, NA; Noe, L; Pasta, DJ; Roach, J; Schaefer, K, 2008
)
0.91
" (R)-albuterol plasma levels ranged from 10% to 18% higher after racemic albuterol HFA MDI dosing versus after levalbuterol HFA MDI."( A cumulative dose study of levalbuterol and racemic albuterol administered by hydrofluoroalkane-134a metered-dose inhaler in asthmatic subjects.
Baumgartner, RA; Corren, J; Goodwin, E; Hanrahan, JP; McVicar, WK; Nair, P; Pleskow, WW; Tripp, K, 2008
)
1.15
"In this study single-day cumulative dosing of asthmatic subjects with levalbuterol HFA MDI or racemic albuterol HFA MDI resulted in similar improvements in FEV(1) and tolerability."( A cumulative dose study of levalbuterol and racemic albuterol administered by hydrofluoroalkane-134a metered-dose inhaler in asthmatic subjects.
Baumgartner, RA; Corren, J; Goodwin, E; Hanrahan, JP; McVicar, WK; Nair, P; Pleskow, WW; Tripp, K, 2008
)
0.87
" These powders would be anticipated to deposit predominately in the lower regions of the lung following inhalation and then undergo delayed rather than instantaneous drug release, offering the potential to reduce dosing frequency and improve patient compliance."( Carbomer-modified spray-dried respirable powders for pulmonary delivery of salbutamol sulphate.
Alhusban, FA; Seville, PC, 2009
)
0.35
" Venezuela's Ministry of Health ambulatory facilities care for 80 % or more of a mostly urban and impoverished population of 26 million inhabitants, registering close to a million acute asthma visits per year; a nebulised fixed fenoterol-ipratropium bromide combination (Bero-dual, Boehringer-Ingelheim) in repeated dosing is the standard treatment."( Equivalence of a single saline nebulised dose of formoterol powder vs three doses of nebulised Albuterol every twenty minutes in acute asthma in children: a suitable cost effective approach for developing nations.
Abate, J; Capriles-Hulett, A; Ferro, S; Manrique, J; Perez-Puigbo, A; Rodriguez, E; Vera, V,
)
0.35
"It is concluded that four puffs of salmeterol delivered with an MDI and a spacer device induces significant bronchodilation in mechanically ventilated patients with COPD exacerbation, the duration of which is highly variable, precluding definite conclusions in regard to optimum dosing schedules."( Duration of salmeterol-induced bronchodilation in mechanically ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a prospective clinical study.
Gavriilidis, G; Georgopoulos, D; Linardakis, M; Malliotakis, P, 2008
)
0.35
" On 3 separate days, a dose-response curve to inhaled salbutamol (100 microg puff-1), ipratropium bromide (20 microg puff-1) or placebo was constructed 3h after inhalation of the last dose of tiotropium, using one puff, one puff, two puffs and two puffs, for a total cumulative dose of 600 microg salbutamol or 120 microg ipratropium bromide."( Acute effects of higher than standard doses of salbutamol and ipratropium on tiotropium-induced bronchodilation in patients with stable COPD.
Cazzola, M; Centanni, S; D'Adda, A; Di Marco, F; Pizzolato, S; Santus, P, 2009
)
0.35
"4% predicted) were randomized to receive mono-therapy (either arformoterol 15microg BID [n=76] or tiotropium 18microg QD [n=80]), or combined therapy (sequential dosing of arformoterol 15microg BID and tiotropium 18microg QD [n=78])."( Effects of arformoterol twice daily, tiotropium once daily, and their combination in patients with COPD.
Andrews, WT; Donohue, JF; Goodwin, E; Hanrahan, JP; Huang, H; Mahler, DA; Schaefer, K; Tashkin, DP, 2009
)
0.35
"In subjects with persistent asthma, the ADRB2 Arg16Gly polymorphism does not alter lung function responses to SAL or FSC over the 12 hour dosing interval following acute and chronic dosing."( Acute and chronic lung function responses to salmeterol and salmeterol plus fluticasone propionate in relation to Arg16Gly beta(2)-adrenergic polymorphisms.
Anderson, WH; Edwards, LD; Klotsman, M; Ortega, HG; Yancey, SW, 2009
)
0.35
"Chronic dosing with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in a single device provides superior protection compared with an inhaled corticosteroid alone in protecting against exercise-induced asthma in children with persistent asthma."( Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol and exercise-induced asthma in children with persistent asthma.
Matz, J; Ortega, HG; Pearlman, D; Qaqundah, P; Stempel, DA; Yancey, SW, 2009
)
0.35
"Mucoadhesive patch releasing the drug in the oral cavity at predetermined rate may present distinct advantages over traditional dosage forms such as tablets, gels and solutions."( Development and characterization of mucoadhesive buccal patches of salbutamol sulphate.
Patel, RS; Poddar, SS, 2009
)
0.35
" Using the data collected with the USP II apparatus, the plasma profiles were simulated and compared with human plasma profiles obtained after administration of the same dosage forms to healthy fasted volunteers."( A comparative study of different release apparatus in generating in vitro-in vivo correlations for extended release formulations.
Aivaliotis, A; Butler, J; Dressman, J; Fischbach, M; Fotaki, N; Hempenstall, J; Klein, S; Reppas, C, 2009
)
0.35
"This study was carried out to compare the rate and extent of absorption of a generic salbutamol in oral dosage form (Brethmol, 4 mg) with the proprietary equivalent product (Ventolin, 4 mg), in healthy adult subjects, under fasting conditions."( Comparative bioavailability study of two salbutamol tablets in healthy adult volunteers.
Basu, RC; Chik, Z; Lee, TC; Mohamed, Z; Pendek, R, 2009
)
0.35
"The purpose of this study was to examine safety during the initial escalation day, buildup phase, and home dosing phase in subjects enrolled in a peanut OIT study."( Safety of a peanut oral immunotherapy protocol in children with peanut allergy.
Burks, AW; Hofmann, AM; Jones, SM; Kamilaris, J; Lokhnygina, Y; Palmer, KP; Scurlock, AM; Steele, PH, 2009
)
0.35
" Two recently completed trials have demonstrated that with respect to asthma control the combination of inhaled steroid (400 - 800 microg/d) plus theophylline is at least as effective as doubling the dose of inhaled steroid in patients who remain symptomatic on a dosage of 400 - 800 microg daily."( [Asthma therapy: combination of topical glucocorticosteroids and theophylline].
Ukena, D, 1997
)
0.3
" The results suggest coacervation thermal change as an appropriate approach to develop slow-release multi-unit oral dosage form of salbutamol sulphate suggesting at least twice administration in every 24 hours."( A comparative study of various microencapsulation techniques: effect of polymer viscosity on microcapsule characteristics.
Ahamd, M; Akhtar, N; Murtaza, G; Rasool, F, 2009
)
0.35
"Salbutamol (sustained released formulation) administered orally at a daily dose of 16 mg using a periodic dosage regimen (3 wks on, 1 wk off)."( Periodic salbutamol in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: a randomized controlled trial.
Attarian, S; Desnuelle, C; Doppler, V; Eymard, B; Hammouda, EH; Hogrel, JY; Lacomblez, L; Laforêt, P; Ollivier, G; Payan, CA; Pouget, J, 2009
)
0.35
"One titrimetric and two spectrophotometric methods which are simple, sensitive and rapid are described for the assay of salbutamol sulphate (SBS) in bulk drug and in tablet dosage forms using N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) and two dyes, rhodamine-B and methylene blue, as reagents."( Rapid titrimetric and spectrophotometric methods for salbutamol sulphate in pharmaceuticals using N-bromosuccinimide.
Basavaiah, K; Ramakrishna, V; Somashekar, BC, 2007
)
0.34
"A simple, sensitive and specific RP-HPLC method was developed for the quantification of related impurities of albuterol sulfate (AS) and ipratropium bromide (IB) in liquid pharmaceutical dosage form."( Development and validation of a stability indicating RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of related substances of albuterol sulfate and ipratropium bromide in nasal solution.
Farooqui, M; Kasawar, GB, 2010
)
0.78
" The CIC showed the least serum cortisol suppression of the tested dosing regimens."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate in patients with persistent asthma.
Derendorf, H; Derom, E; Lahu, G; Nave, R; Xu, J, 2010
)
0.36
"Cumulative dosing with albuterol HFA 180 microg or 360 microg via MDI-spacer and face mask in children younger than 2 years did not result in any significant safety issues and improved MTASS by at least 48%."( Repeat dosing of albuterol via metered-dose inhaler in infants with acute obstructive airway disease: a randomized controlled safety trial.
Davis, AM; Ellsworth, A; Goodman, B; Kaashmiri, M; Lincourt, WR; Shepard, J; Trivedi, R, 2010
)
1.01
" The first step in outpatient management should be to increase the dosage of inhaled short-acting bronchodilators."( Management of COPD exacerbations.
Evensen, AE, 2010
)
0.36
" The films were designed to release the drug for a prolonged period of time so as to reduce the frequency of administration of the available conventional dosage forms of SS."( In vitro and in vivo evaluation of buccal bioadhesive films containing salbutamol sulphate.
Deshpande, SB; Jain, A; Muthu, MS; Rawat, MK; Singh, S; Singh, SK; Soni, R, 2010
)
0.36
" Levcromakalim produced concentration-dependent inhibitory effect on myometrial spontaneity and relaxant effect and the dose-response curve (DRC) was shifted towards right in the presence of glybenclamaide."( Cellular coupling of potassium channels with beta2 adrenoceptors in mediating myometrial relaxation in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis).
Choudhury, S; Garg, SK; Mishra, SK; Singh, TU, 2010
)
0.36
"Hydrophilic matrix formulations are important and simple technologies that are used to manufacture sustained release dosage forms."( Swelling, erosion and drug release characteristics of salbutamol sulfate from hydroxypropyl methylcellulose-based matrix tablets.
Chaibva, FA; Khamanga, SM; Walker, RB, 2010
)
0.36
" No significant dose-response or difference in T : R ratio was noted for OUCC."( Systemic bioavailability of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulations of fluticasone/salmeterol in healthy volunteers via pMDI alone and spacer.
Clearie, KL; Du Bois, J; Lipworth, BJ; Nell, H; Vaidyanathan, S; Williamson, PA, 2010
)
0.36
" Single dosing studies with fluticasone/salmeterol 250/25 microg via pMDI or with spacer showed pharmacokinetic equivalence with FP, but not SM."( Systemic bioavailability of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulations of fluticasone/salmeterol in healthy volunteers via pMDI alone and spacer.
Clearie, KL; Du Bois, J; Lipworth, BJ; Nell, H; Vaidyanathan, S; Williamson, PA, 2010
)
0.36
" All three children received inhaled colistin at a dosage of 75 mg diluted in 3 ml of normal saline twice daily (1,875,000 IU of colistin daily), for a duration of 25, 32, and 15 days, respectively."( Inhaled colistin for the treatment of tracheobronchitis and pneumonia in critically ill children without cystic fibrosis.
Falagas, ME; Kafetzis, DA; Korbila, IP; Papadatos, JH; Sideri, G; Vouloumanou, EK, 2010
)
0.36
" dosing schedule, formulation, etc."( Adherence to controller therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review.
Blanchette, CM; Charles, MS; Dalal, AA; Lavallee, D; Mapel, D; Silver, H, 2010
)
0.36
"5, 3 and 6 μm mass median aerodynamic diameter in a cumulative dosing schedule of 10, 20, 40 and 100 μg."( Predicting the clinical effect of a short acting bronchodilator in individual patients using artificial neural networks.
Biddiscombe, MF; Chrystyn, H; de Matas, M; Meah, S; Shao, Q; Usmani, OS, 2010
)
0.36
" Known adverse effects of propranolol treatment include transient bradycardia, hypotension, hypoglycemia, and bronchospasm (in patients with underlying spastic respiratory illnesses), which led to a general recommendation to gradually increase propranolol dosage and closely monitor patients' hemodynamics at the onset of therapy."( Hyperkalemia complicating propranolol treatment of an infantile hemangioma.
Kietz, S; Lakomek, M; Lauerer, P; Pavlakovic, H; Zutt, M, 2010
)
0.36
" Statistical design and response surface methodology have been successfully used to understand and optimize formulation factors and interactions that impact the in vitro release characteristics of salbutamol sulfate from a potential multisource sustained release dosage form."( The use of response surface methodology for the formulation and optimization of salbutamol sulfate hydrophilic matrix sustained release tablets.
Chaibva, FA; Walker, RB,
)
0.13
" The greatest challenge in the use of PD measurements with some OIPs (particularly inhaled corticosteroids) is the demonstration of a dose-response relationship (for local effects), without which the bioassay, and hence a PD study, may not have sufficient sensitivity to detect differences in product performance."( Role of pharmacokinetics in establishing bioequivalence for orally inhaled drug products: workshop summary report.
Adams, WP; Chen, ML; Daley-Yates, P; Davis, J; Derendorf, H; Ducharme, MP; Fuglsang, A; Herrle, M; Hochhaus, G; Holmes, SM; Lee, SL; Li, BV; Lyapustina, S; Newman, S; O'Connor, D; Oliver, M; Patterson, B; Peart, J; Poochikian, G; Roy, P; Shah, T; Sharp, SS; Singh, GJ, 2011
)
0.37
" Under-treatment with ICS and differential dosing of ICS in many trials are major factors driving the LABA safety concern."( Safe use of long-acting β-agonists: what have we learnt?
Sears, MR, 2011
)
0.37
"To evaluate the use of thermal ink-jetting as a method for dosing drugs onto oral films."( Preparation of personalized-dose salbutamol sulphate oral films with thermal ink-jet printing.
Basit, AW; Buanz, AB; Gaisford, S; Saunders, MH, 2011
)
0.37
" We proposed a systematic classification scheme using FDA-approved drug labeling to assess the DILI potential of drugs, which yielded a benchmark dataset with 287 drugs representing a wide range of therapeutic categories and daily dosage amounts."( FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
Chen, M; Fang, H; Liu, Z; Shi, Q; Tong, W; Vijay, V, 2011
)
0.37
" Determination of the significance of the observed differences in pharmacokinetics from this single-dose study requires further exploration in studies using clinically relevant dosing regimens."( Comparative pulmonary function and pharmacokinetics of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate delivered by two dry powder inhalers to patients with asthma.
Harrison, LI; Needham, MJ; Novak, CC; Ratner, P, 2011
)
0.37
" The limitations of the analysis are that the results from a single study, TORCH, have a large bearing on the overall findings of the analysis, and that there is heterogeneity in the length and the dosing of the included studies, although it does not appear that heterogeneity affected the reported results."( Budesonide/formoterol vs. salmeterol/fluticasone in COPD: a systematic review and adjusted indirect comparison of pneumonia in randomised controlled trials.
Edwards, SJ; Gray, J; Halpin, DM; Morais, J; Singh, D, 2011
)
0.37
"We report in this manuscript, the use of direct ammonium persulfate-enhanced chemiluminescence (CL) imaging, to monitor changes to measure serum salbutamol concentration in subjects of different haptoglobin (Hp) phenotypes at different dosing time."( Direct monitoring changes of salbutamol concentration in serum by chemiluminescent imaging.
Delanghe, JR; Na, N; Ouyang, J; Zhang, C; Zhang, R, 2011
)
0.37
"These results suggest that there are differences in lung diffusion and peripheral SaO(2) according to genetic variation of the ADRB2 at position 27 which could play a potential role in dosing options or adjustments that may be required according to genotype."( Influence of genetic variation of the β2-adrenergic receptor on lung diffusion in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Daines, CL; Foxx-Lupo, WT; Morgan, WJ; Patanwala, AE; Phan, H; Skrentny, TT; Snyder, EM; Sprissler, R; Traylor, BR; Wheatley, CM, 2011
)
0.37
"Ten patients with COPD underwent a dose-response curve to salbutamol (until 800 μg of cumulative dose) after a 1-week washout (baseline), 8 hours after the first administration of formoterol 12 μg (day 1), and after a 12-week and 24-week period of treatment with formoterol (12 μg twice daily by dry powder inhaler)."( Dose-response curve to salbutamol during acute and chronic treatment with formoterol in COPD.
Bertella, E; Corda, L; La Piana, GE; Montemurro, LT; Pini, L; Tantucci, C, 2011
)
0.37
"5) concentrations were logged, suggesting a nonlinear dose-response relationship between particulate matter exposure concentrations and airway mediators of asthma, for which the relationship tends to flatten at higher concentrations."( The response of children with asthma to ambient particulate is modified by tobacco smoke exposure.
Gelfand, EW; Rabinovitch, N; Silveira, L; Strand, M, 2011
)
0.37
" This negative interaction, the smaller effect of particulate matter exposure in children exposed to higher ETS, may be related to a nonlinear dose-response relationship between asthma mediators and particulate exposures."( The response of children with asthma to ambient particulate is modified by tobacco smoke exposure.
Gelfand, EW; Rabinovitch, N; Silveira, L; Strand, M, 2011
)
0.37
" Intracoronary salbutamol demonstrated significant dose-response ΔSLV and ΔCBF from baseline, respectively (0."( Coronary β2-adrenoreceptors mediate endothelium-dependent vasoreactivity in humans: novel insights from an in vivo intravascular ultrasound study.
Beltrame, JF; Carbone, A; Copus, B; Leong, DP; Liew, GY; Nelson, AJ; Nicholls, SJ; Puri, R; Wong, DT; Worthley, MI; Worthley, SG, 2012
)
0.38
"FSC or other ICS exposure was not associated with an increased odds of cataracts or glaucoma, nor was a dose-response relationship observed in this population-based nested case-control study of COPD patients in the United Kingdom."( Long-term use of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol fixed-dose combination and incidence of cataracts and glaucoma among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in the UK General Practice Research Database.
Davis, KJ; Miller, DP; Sampson, T; Watkins, SE, 2011
)
0.37
"Prediction of pharmacokinetic (PK) profile for inhaled drugs in humans provides valuable information to aid toxicology safety assessment, evaluate the potential for systemic accumulation on multiple dosing and enable an estimate for the clinical plasma assay requirements."( A new methodology for predicting human pharmacokinetics for inhaled drugs from oratracheal pharmacokinetic data in rats.
Harrison, A; Jones, RM, 2012
)
0.38
"For the primary outcome there was significant protection after single and long-term dosing with fluticasone alone and fluticasone-salmeterol combination, whereas salmeterol alone only afforded protection after the first dose."( Effects of intranasal salmeterol and fluticasone given alone and in combination in persistent allergic rhinitis.
Burns, P; Lipworth, BJ; Nair, A; Short, P, 2012
)
0.38
"Chronic dosing with fluticasone but not salmeterol confers anti-inflammatory activity against nasal AMP challenge, but there was no potentiation of fluticasone when given in combination with salmeterol."( Effects of intranasal salmeterol and fluticasone given alone and in combination in persistent allergic rhinitis.
Burns, P; Lipworth, BJ; Nair, A; Short, P, 2012
)
0.38
" Normally, an increase in chlorine dosage and pH resulted in faster degradation of these pharmaceuticals."( Reaction of β-blockers and β-agonist pharmaceuticals with aqueous chlorine. Investigation of kinetics and by-products by liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry.
Cela, R; Quintana, JB; Rodil, R, 2012
)
0.38
" Among them, C9 had highest affinity, best dose-response behavior, lowest limit of detection, and highest specificity and was chosen to be labeled with colloidal gold as the detector reagent and applied on the conjugate pad."( A high-affinity anti-salbutamol monoclonal antibody: key to a robust lateral-flow immunochromatographic assay.
Chen, FJ; Xie, CH; Yang, TB, 2012
)
0.38
" In conclusion, our results suggest that abediterol has a preclinical profile for once-daily dosing in humans together with a fast onset of action and a favorable cardiovascular safety profile."( Pharmacological characterization of abediterol, a novel inhaled β(2)-adrenoceptor agonist with long duration of action and a favorable safety profile in preclinical models.
Aparici, M; Beleta, J; Carcasona, C; Cortijo, J; De Alba, J; Gavaldà, A; Gómez-Angelats, M; Gras, J; Miralpeix, M; Morcillo, E; Otal, R; Puig, C; Ramos, I; Ryder, H; Vilella, D; Viñals, M, 2012
)
0.38
" As a result, asthma exacerbation can be treated with pMDIs used through holding chambers in emergency room successfully when applied with dosing scheme appropriate for the patient's age, weight and severity of exacerbation (usually 1/4th of nebule dosing) on the contrary to ordinary method of nebulizers."( [Salbutamol in asthma treatment: with nebulizer or inhaler?].
Cavkaytar, O; Sekerel, BE, 2012
)
0.38
"The objective of this work was to characterize the dose-response relationship between two inhaled long-acting beta agonists (PF-00610355 and salmeterol) and the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in order to inform dosing recommendations for future clinical trials in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)."( Longitudinal FEV1 dose-response model for inhaled PF-00610355 and salmeterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Cleton, A; Hutmacher, MM; Martin, SW; Nielsen, JC; Ribbing, J, 2012
)
0.38
" This pharmacological profile combined with clinical data is consistent with once a day dosing of vilanterol in the treatment of both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)."( In vitro pharmacological characterization of vilanterol, a novel long-acting β2-adrenoceptor agonist with 24-hour duration of action.
Barrett, VJ; Emmons, AJ; Ford, AJ; Knowles, RG; Morrison, VS; Slack, RJ; Sturton, RG, 2013
)
0.39
" Treatment was twice-daily dosing with albuterol HFA MDI at 90 micrograms with dose counter for either 5 or 7 weeks."( Prospective, open-label assessment of albuterol sulfate hydrofluoroalkane metered-dose inhaler with new integrated dose counter.
Given, J; Iverson, H; Lepore, M; Taveras, H,
)
0.67
" The secondary outcome was difference in symptom scores among the three treatment groups to determine if one dosing protocol was superior to another."( Early intervention with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids for control of acute asthma exacerbations at home and improved outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.
Hossain, J; Mannan, S; McGeady, S; Skorpinski, E; Yousef, E,
)
0.13
" No effects were observed on glucose, potassium, heart rate, blood pressure and no dose-response effect was seen on corrected QT elongation."( A new class of bronchodilator improves lung function in COPD: a trial with GSK961081.
Baggen, S; Chan, R; Locantore, N; Ludwig-Sengpiel, A; Riley, JH; Wielders, PL, 2013
)
0.39
" Assumed the importance of this topic and the lack of a clinical evaluation specifically designed to assess the impact of chronic administration of indacaterol on the response to salbutamol, we sought to compare the effect of 4-week treatment with indacaterol 150 μg once-daily versus formoterol 12 μg twice-daily on the dose-response curve to inhaled salbutamol (total cumulative dose of 800 μg) in a non-double-blinded, crossover, randomised, and controlled pilot trial that enrolled 20 outpatients with moderate to severe COPD."( Chronic treatment with indacaterol and airway response to salbutamol in stable COPD.
Cazzola, M; Matera, MG; Picciolo, S; Proietto, A; Rogliani, P; Ruggeri, P; Segreti, A, 2013
)
0.39
" However, no specific dosing recommendations have been made for children admitted to the PICU."( Corticosteroid therapy in critically ill pediatric asthmatic patients.
Canarie, MF; Carroll, CL; Faustino, EV; Giuliano, JS; Li, S; Pinto, MG, 2013
)
0.39
" Country of practice, years of experience, and PICU size were not associated with corticosteroid dosing preference."( Corticosteroid therapy in critically ill pediatric asthmatic patients.
Canarie, MF; Carroll, CL; Faustino, EV; Giuliano, JS; Li, S; Pinto, MG, 2013
)
0.39
" Future research is needed to determine the most appropriate corticosteroid dosage in this critically ill patient population."( Corticosteroid therapy in critically ill pediatric asthmatic patients.
Canarie, MF; Carroll, CL; Faustino, EV; Giuliano, JS; Li, S; Pinto, MG, 2013
)
0.39
" There is a need for long-term randomised controlled trials of these technologies to determine patient-focused outcomes (such as quality of life and burden of care), safe and effective dosing levels of medications and clinical outcomes (such as hospitalisations and need for antibiotics) and an economic evaluation of their use."( Nebuliser systems for drug delivery in cystic fibrosis.
Daniels, T; Mills, N; Whitaker, P, 2013
)
0.39
" The Respimat SMI delivery device is a novel, efficient, and well-received system for the delivery of aerosolized albuterol and ipratropium bromide to patients with COPD; however, the presence of longer-acting, less frequently dosed respiratory medications provide patients and providers with other therapeutic options."( Efficacy and safety of eco-friendly inhalers: focus on combination ipratropium bromide and albuterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Panos, RJ, 2013
)
0.82
"The unintentional generation of amorphous character in crystalline active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) is an adverse consequence of mechanical activation during dosage form manufacture."( Reducing mechanical activation-induced amorphisation of salbutamol sulphate by co-processing with selected carboxylic acids.
Amharar, Y; Corcoran, S; Corrigan, OI; Curtin, V; Gallagher, KH; Healy, AM; Tajber, L, 2013
)
0.39
" Patients remaining on FP-SAL (n=1,146) were compared with those switched to efBDP-FOR at an equivalent or lower inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dosage (n=382)."( Clinical and cost effectiveness of switching asthma patients from fluticasone-salmeterol to extra-fine particle beclometasone-formoterol: a retrospective matched observational study of real-world patients.
Brockman, J; Burden, A; Gruffydd-Jones, K; Harris, T; Haughney, J; King, C; Lavorini, F; Papi, A; Price, D; Ryan, D; Small, I, 2013
)
0.39
"05) odds of achieving overall asthma control (no asthma-related hospitalisations, bronchial infections, or acute oral steroids; salbutamol ≤200μg/day) and lower daily short-acting β2-agonist usage at a lower daily ICS dosage (mean -130μg/day FP equivalents; p<0."( Clinical and cost effectiveness of switching asthma patients from fluticasone-salmeterol to extra-fine particle beclometasone-formoterol: a retrospective matched observational study of real-world patients.
Brockman, J; Burden, A; Gruffydd-Jones, K; Harris, T; Haughney, J; King, C; Lavorini, F; Papi, A; Price, D; Ryan, D; Small, I, 2013
)
0.39
"Asthma patients may be switched from FP-SAL to efBDP-FOR at an equivalent or lower ICS dosage with no reduction in clinical effectiveness but a significant reduction in cost."( Clinical and cost effectiveness of switching asthma patients from fluticasone-salmeterol to extra-fine particle beclometasone-formoterol: a retrospective matched observational study of real-world patients.
Brockman, J; Burden, A; Gruffydd-Jones, K; Harris, T; Haughney, J; King, C; Lavorini, F; Papi, A; Price, D; Ryan, D; Small, I, 2013
)
0.39
" Controlling for FP dosage and baseline characteristics, FSC patients had lower risks of asthma-related exacerbations, fewer SABAs and systemic corticosteroids, higher costs of asthma medications and total asthma-related health care, and lower total asthma-related health-care costs excluding study medication cost."( Health-care utilization and costs with fluticasone propionate and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in asthma patients at risk for exacerbations.
Delea, TE; Hagiwara, M; Stanford, RH,
)
0.13
"Asthmatic athletes using salbutamol should receive clear dosing advise and education to minimize the risk of inhaling doses of salbutamol that may produce urine concentrations of salbutamol above 1200 ng/mL."( Impact of ethnicity, gender, and dehydration on the urinary excretion of inhaled salbutamol with respect to doping control.
Chester, N; Dickinson, J; Hu, J; Loosemore, M; Whyte, G, 2014
)
0.4
" Initially oral dosing was undertaken in neonatal mice administered a maximum tolerable dose of racemic albuterol."( Enantioselective disposition of (R/S)-albuterol in skeletal and cardiac muscle.
Jacobson, GA; Premilovac, D; Rattigan, S; Yee, KC, 2014
)
0.89
" A subsample of 259 families had controller medication use monitored objectively for approximately 1 month by MDILog (fluticasone propionate), TrackCap (montelukast), or dosage counter (fluticasone/salmeterol combination)."( Complementary and alternative medicine use and adherence to asthma medications among Latino and non-Latino white families.
Adams, SK; Canino, G; Fedele, DA; Fritz, GK; Jandasek, B; Koinis-Mitchell, D; Kopel, SJ; McQuaid, EL; Mitchell, J; Seifer, R,
)
0.13
"The slope of the IV methacholine dose-response curve for Rrs was similar in dogs and monkeys and both species differed from minipigs, which showed greater reactivity."( Respiratory mechanics: comparison of Beagle dogs, Göttingen minipigs and Cynomolgus monkeys.
Authier, S; Bassett, L; Gold, L; Maghezzi, S; Robichaud, A; Schuessler, T; Troncy, E; Truchetti, G,
)
0.13
" The dose-response relationship was similar within the non-asthma patients."( Beta2-adrenergic agonist use and the risk of multiple sclerosis: a total population-based case-control study.
Lee, CT; Lin, FC; Tsai, CP, 2014
)
0.4
" An estimate of the urine average concentration at steady-state was collected by averaging the concentration measurements in the dosing period from -12 to 0 h relative to the last administered dose."( Detection and pharmacokinetics of salbutamol in thoroughbred racehorses following inhaled administration.
Hillyer, L; Hincks, PR; Paine, SW; Pearce, CM; Scarth, J; Wieder, ME, 2015
)
0.42
" RESULTS were adjusted for initial prescriber, initial medication, dosing regimen and relevant comorbidities."( Impact of multiple-dose versus single-dose inhaler devices on COPD patients' persistence with long-acting β₂-agonists: a dispensing database analysis.
Dekhuijzen, PN; Postma, MJ; van Boven, JF; van der Galiën, R; van der Molen, T; van Raaij, JJ; Vegter, S, 2014
)
0.4
" Dose-response RL curves in affected and carrier mice indicated a lack of methacholine response."( Plp1 gene duplication inhibits airway responsiveness and induces lung inflammation.
Armani, MH; Hobson, GM; Kreiger, PA; Rodriguez, E; Sakowski, L; Shaffer, TH; Waldman, SA; Zhu, Y, 2015
)
0.42
"The effectiveness of inhaled salbutamol in routine care depends particularly on prescribed dosage and applied inhalation technique."( How to improve prescription of inhaled salbutamol by providing standardised feedback on administration: a controlled intervention pilot study with follow-up.
Bertsche, A; Bertsche, T; Frontini, R; Kaune, A; Kiess, W; Musiol, J; Neininger, MP; Prenzel, F; Rink, J, 2015
)
0.42
"The developed salbutamol sulfate matrix tablets might be beneficial over the conventional tablets to decrease the dosing frequency and enhanced patient compliance."( In situ cross-linked matrix tablets for sustained salbutamol sulfate release - formulation development by statistical optimization.
Das, K; Malakar, J; Nayak, AK,
)
0.13
"5 mg four times daily (n = 57); dosage reductions and other respiratory therapies were permitted."( Clinical outcomes and treatment cost comparison of levalbuterol versus albuterol in hospitalized adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma.
Brunetti, L; Dhanaliwala, F; Kang, H; Poiani, G; Poppiti, K; Suh, DC, 2015
)
0.67
"The clinicians followed various respiratory trends monitored by the Servo-i ventilator after albuterol dosing to document the clinical utility of using albuterol in this infant."( Assessing the Response to Inhaled Albuterol by Monitoring Patient Effort-Related Trends With a Servo-I Ventilator in Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist Mode: A Case Presentation.
Brinck, MJ; Snow, TM, 2015
)
0.92
"The infant had a positive response to albuterol dosing that subsequently led to reduced length of stay, reduced costs, and reduced family anxiety."( Assessing the Response to Inhaled Albuterol by Monitoring Patient Effort-Related Trends With a Servo-I Ventilator in Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist Mode: A Case Presentation.
Brinck, MJ; Snow, TM, 2015
)
0.97
" In summary, the DPI formulation based on untreated lactose, especially by capsule filling using a dosing chamber to powder layer (compression) ratio of 1:2, proved to be superior in terms of the dosing accuracy (RSD<0."( Carrier-based dry powder inhalation: Impact of carrier modification on capsule filling processability and in vitro aerodynamic performance.
Faulhammer, E; Khinast, JG; Paudel, A; Wahl, V; Zellnitz, S, 2015
)
0.42
" Incidences of β2-agonist-related events (excluding headache) during the pooled 12-week dosing periods were low (≤ 1%) in both groups."( Twelve- and 52-week safety of albuterol multidose dry powder inhaler in patients with persistent asthma.
Iverson, H; Miller, D; O'Brien, C; Raphael, G; Taveras, H, 2016
)
0.72
" The primary outcome will be measured by using the asthma control test and the secondary outcomes will be measured by using the percentage of symptom-free days, the average dosage of salbutamol aerosol and/or prednisone tablets, lung functions, daily asthma symptom scores, asthma quality of life questionnaire, and so on."( Efficacy of acupuncture for chronic asthma: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Fan, L; Feng, JT; Hu, CP; Liu, YY; Shao, SJ; Wang, PY; Wang, WQ; Wang, Y; Xu, YD; Yang, YQ; Yin, LM; Zhang, TF, 2015
)
0.42
" Primary efficacy endpoints were baseline-adjusted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at 30 min (30-min FEV1) after each cumulative dose (Study 1) and FEV1 area under the effect curve over 6 h (FEV1 AUEC0-6) after dosing (Study 2)."( Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Efficacy, and Safety of Albuterol (Salbuterol) Multi-dose Dry-Powder Inhaler and ProAir(®) Hydrofluoroalkane for the Treatment of Persistent Asthma: Results of Two Randomized Double-Blind Studies.
Iverson, H; Kerwin, EM; Lepore, MS; Miller, DS; Shah, T; Taveras, H; Wayne, D, 2016
)
0.68
" Our aim was to characterize dosing and timing of epinephrine, diphenhydramine, and albuterol in the pediatric patient with anaphylaxis."( Prehospital Administration of Epinephrine in Pediatric Anaphylaxis.
Barger, J; Carrillo, E; Hern, HG, 2016
)
0.66
"In pre-clinical animal studies, the uniformity of dosing across subjects and routes of administration is a crucial requirement."( Optimization and Dose Estimation of Aerosol Delivery to Non-Human Primates.
de Swart, RL; Duprex, WP; Fink, JB; Janssens, HM; MacLoughlin, RJ; van Amerongen, G, 2016
)
0.43
"Albuterol multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) with an integrated dose counter allows patients to track the number of remaining doses and to simplify dosing by eliminating the need to coordinate inhalation with actuation associated with metered-dose inhalers."( Prospective, open-label evaluation of a new albuterol multidose dry powder inhaler with integrated dose counter.
Given, J; Iverson, H; Taveras, H, 2016
)
2.14
" Patients who demonstrated adequate MDPI inhaler technique and ≥90% compliance with dosing and diary completion during a run-in period qualified for treatment with albuterol MDPI with a dose counter (2 inhalations/dose; 90 μg/inhalation) twice daily for up to 50 days."( Prospective, open-label evaluation of a new albuterol multidose dry powder inhaler with integrated dose counter.
Given, J; Iverson, H; Taveras, H, 2016
)
0.89
" For salbutamol and formoterol, urine thresholds have been adopted to limit supratherapeutic dosing and to discriminate between inhaled (permitted) and oral (prohibited) use."( Beta2-Agonist Doping Control and Optical Isomer Challenges.
Fawcett, JP; Jacobson, GA, 2016
)
0.43
"The ideal dosing of albuterol via metered-dose inhalers for acute childhood asthma is not well established."( Albuterol via metered-dose inhaler in children: Lower doses are effective, and higher doses are safe.
da Silva Filho, LV; De Lalibera, IB; de Souza, AV; Muchão, FP; Rodrigues, JC; Schvartsman, C; Souza, JM; Torres, HC, 2016
)
2.2
"Higher albuterol dosage regimens did not result in lower admission rate or shorter length of stay in the ER, but showed similar safety profile for children with moderate to severe acute asthma."( Albuterol via metered-dose inhaler in children: Lower doses are effective, and higher doses are safe.
da Silva Filho, LV; De Lalibera, IB; de Souza, AV; Muchão, FP; Rodrigues, JC; Schvartsman, C; Souza, JM; Torres, HC, 2016
)
2.33
" The primary efficacy variable was the change in forced expiratory volume in one second from predose to 60 minutes after dosing on day 85."( Efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide/salbutamol sulphate administered in a hydrofluoroalkane metered-dose inhaler for the treatment of COPD.
Bhargava, S; Bhattacharya, A; Gogtay, J; Purandare, S; Rebello, J; Singh, V; Talwar, D; Whig, J, 2016
)
0.43
" Devices that are straightforward to use are less likely to result in dosing errors and can improve patients' satisfaction with therapy and adherence."( Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical efficacy of albuterol RespiClick(™) dry-powder inhaler in the treatment of asthma.
Welch, MJ, 2016
)
0.68
" We will measure urinary salbutamol levels 30 min after dosing as an estimate of salbutamol doses in the lungs, and also look for genetic polymorphisms linked to poor responses to inhaled salbutamol."( How can we optimise inhaled beta2 agonist dose as 'reliever' medicine for wheezy pre-school children? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Alberti, C; Beydon, N; Bremner, S; Earl, G; Lansley, A; Mukhopadhyay, S; Olden, C; Palmer, CN; Seddon, P; Symes, L; Wileman, E, 2016
)
0.43
"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of albuterol MDPI versus placebo MDPI after chronic dosing in children with asthma."( Albuterol multidose dry powder inhaler efficacy and safety versus placebo in children with asthma.
Iverson, H; LaForce, C; Shore, P; Taveras, H, 2017
)
2.17
" The benefit of albuterol (mean change in PPFEV1) was evident 5 minutes after dosing and lasted several hours; the maximal effect was noted 1 to 2 hours after dosing."( Albuterol multidose dry powder inhaler efficacy and safety versus placebo in children with asthma.
Iverson, H; LaForce, C; Shore, P; Taveras, H, 2017
)
2.24
" Clinical efficacy was evident within 5 minutes of dosing and maintained for >2 hours."( Albuterol multidose dry powder inhaler efficacy and safety versus placebo in children with asthma.
Iverson, H; LaForce, C; Shore, P; Taveras, H, 2017
)
1.9
" The time to q2h dosing from initiation of CAN was compared between the baseline and SCAMP cohorts."( A Critical Asthma Standardized Clinical and Management Plan Reduces Duration of Critical Asthma Therapy.
Agus, MS; Graham, DA; Melendez, E; Wong, J, 2017
)
0.46
" There was a decrease in median time to q2h dosing after the SCAMP (baseline, 21."( A Critical Asthma Standardized Clinical and Management Plan Reduces Duration of Critical Asthma Therapy.
Agus, MS; Graham, DA; Melendez, E; Wong, J, 2017
)
0.46
" However, the mechanisms and dose-response relationships are poorly understood."( Effects of nebulised magnesium sulphate on inflammation and function of the guinea-pig airway.
Broadley, KJ; Ford, WR; Kidd, EJ; Powell, C; Turner, DL, 2017
)
0.46
"Patients receiving noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may benefit from medical aerosol, but most guidance on dosing with different aerosol devices is limited to in-vitro studies."( In-vitro/in-vivo comparison of inhaled salbutamol dose delivered by jet nebulizer, vibrating mesh nebulizer and metered dose inhaler with spacer during non-invasive ventilation.
Abdelrahim, ME; Abdelrahman, MM; Hassan, A; Salah Eldin, R, 2017
)
0.46
"Patient receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) may benefit from medical aerosol, but guidance on dosing with different aerosol devices is limited to in-vitro studies."( Inhaled salbutamol dose delivered by jet nebulizer, vibrating mesh nebulizer and metered dose inhaler with spacer during invasive mechanical ventilation.
Abdelrahim, ME; Abdelrahman, MM; Al-Kholy, MB; Boules, ME; El Essawy, AFM; ElHansy, MHE; Hussein, RRS; Said, ASA, 2017
)
0.46
"5 h post dosing and pooled for the next 24 h."( Lung deposition and systemic bioavailability of different aerosol devices with and without humidification in mechanically ventilated patients.
Abdelrahim, MEA; Al Hallag, M; Ali, MRA; Dailey, P; Fink, JB; Moustafa, IOF; Rabea, H,
)
0.13
" The assay was successfully applied to the quantification of blood salbutamol concentrations in three healthy volunteers dosed with 1 mg salbutamol by inhalation."( Quantitation of salbutamol using micro-volume blood sampling - applications to exacerbations of pediatric asthma.
Cordell, RL; Hawcutt, DB; Monks, PS; Pandya, HC; Semple, MG; Valkenburg, TSE, 2018
)
0.48
" In this small pilot dose-response study, we aimed to explore whether addition of nebulized salbutamol to standard care might improve resuscitation."( Salbutamol in acute organophosphorus insecticide poisoning - a pilotdose-response phase II study.
Alam, MMJ; Bari, MS; Chowdhury, FR; Eddleston, M; Maruf, S; Patwary, MI; Rahman, MM; Ruhan, AM; Uddin, MM; Ullah, P, 2018
)
0.48
" The new formulation was bioequivalent to the co-administration of two drugs in separate dosage forms."( Investigation of a potential drug-drug interaction between salbutamol and ambroxol and bioequivalence of a new fixed-dose combination containing these two drugs in healthy Chinese subjects.
Ding, L; Li, T; Liu, L; Lu, J; Shi, X; Wang, Y; Yang, W; Zhao, S, 2018
)
0.48
" Subjects presenting with a Pediatric Asthma Score ranging from 5 to 11 received albuterol by BAN or MDI via standard weight-based and symptom severity dosing protocols."( A Randomized Trial Comparing Metered Dose Inhalers and Breath Actuated Nebulizers.
Arnold, SR; Gilmore, B; Jacobs, J; Kink, R; Snider, MA; Wan, JY, 2018
)
0.71
" The current protocol for systemic reactions in immunotherapy is for the prescribing physician to reassess the dosing and schedule as well as the risk:benefit assessment for the therapy and determine whether or not to proceed."( Neurologic manifestations in anaphylaxis due to subcutaneous allergy immunotherapy: A case report.
Mangold, M; Qureshi, M, 2018
)
0.48
" The Solo nebulizer-holding chamber had the highest aerosol emitted compared with all nebulizer-adapter combinations and higher urine samples 30 min after dosing and cumulatively collected urine for 24 h compared with the nebulizer-T-piece."( Effect of a Nebulizer Holding Chamber on Aerosol Delivery.
Abdelrahim, ME; Abdelwahab, NS; Elberry, AA; Rabea, H; Salem, MN; Sarhan, RM, 2018
)
0.48
" A unique opportunity for PBPK model evaluation is provided by the clinical PD data for salbutamol, which in its inhaled dosage form (400 μg), produces a higher bronchodilatory effect than in its oral dosage form (2 mg) despite lower drug concentrations in blood."( Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling Accurately Predicts the Better Bronchodilatory Effect of Inhaled Versus Oral Salbutamol Dosage Forms.
Boger, E; Fridén, M, 2019
)
0.51
" Recent investigations also suggest that the optimal dosing of intravenous insulin may be lower than previously described."( Acute Management of Hyperkalemia.
Liu, M; Rafique, Z, 2019
)
0.51
" Following oral dosing in rats for 7 days, salbutamol and triflusal, but not dimethadione or trazodone, significantly elevated FGF20 levels in the nigrostriatal tract."( Targeted repositioning identifies drugs that increase fibroblast growth factor 20 production and protect against 6-hydroxydopamine-induced nigral cell loss in rats.
Doherty, P; Duty, S; Fletcher, EJR; Jamieson, AD; Williams, G, 2019
)
0.51
" Commercially available syrup dosage form was successfully analyzed by the developed methods without interference from formulation additives."( Bilinear and trilinear algorithms utilizing full and selected variables for resolution and quantitation of four components with overlapped spectral signals in bulk and syrup dosage form.
Boltia, SA; Fayed, AS; Hegazy, MA; Musaed, A, 2019
)
0.51
"This study aimed to investigate the dose-response and pharmacology of a range of single doses of nebulised ensifentrine (RPL554), an inhaled dual phosphodiesterase (PDE) 3/4 inhibitor in patients with asthma."( Efficacy and safety of a first-in-class inhaled PDE3/4 inhibitor (ensifentrine) vs salbutamol in asthma.
Abbott-Banner, K; Bjermer, L; Newman, K, 2019
)
0.51
" For the two co-primary endpoints there was a clear ensifentrine dose-response relationship, with all treatments superior to placebo (p < 0."( Efficacy and safety of a first-in-class inhaled PDE3/4 inhibitor (ensifentrine) vs salbutamol in asthma.
Abbott-Banner, K; Bjermer, L; Newman, K, 2019
)
0.51
"Intravenous salbutamol is used to treat children with refractory status asthmaticus, however insufficient pharmacokinetic data are available to guide initial and subsequent dosing recommendations for its intravenous use."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Salbutamol in Children with Refractory Status Asthmaticus.
Boehmer, ALM; Boeschoten, SA; Buysse, CMP; de Hoog, M; de Wildt, SN; de Winter, BCM; Knibbe, CAJ; Koch, BCP; Koninckx, M; Plötz, FB; Vaessen-Verberne, AA; van der Nagel, BCH; Verhallen, JT; Vet, NJ, 2020
)
0.56
"Our aim was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile for intravenous salbutamol in children with status asthmaticus admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), and to use this model to study the effect of different dosing schemes with and without a loading dose."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Salbutamol in Children with Refractory Status Asthmaticus.
Boehmer, ALM; Boeschoten, SA; Buysse, CMP; de Hoog, M; de Wildt, SN; de Winter, BCM; Knibbe, CAJ; Koch, BCP; Koninckx, M; Plötz, FB; Vaessen-Verberne, AA; van der Nagel, BCH; Verhallen, JT; Vet, NJ, 2020
)
0.56
" After validation, the model was used for simulations to evaluate the effect of different dosing regimens with or without a loading dose."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Salbutamol in Children with Refractory Status Asthmaticus.
Boehmer, ALM; Boeschoten, SA; Buysse, CMP; de Hoog, M; de Wildt, SN; de Winter, BCM; Knibbe, CAJ; Koch, BCP; Koninckx, M; Plötz, FB; Vaessen-Verberne, AA; van der Nagel, BCH; Verhallen, JT; Vet, NJ, 2020
)
0.56
"There has been increasing interest in transnasal pulmonary aerosol administration, but the dose-response relationship has not been reported."( Dose Response to Transnasal Pulmonary Administration of Bronchodilator Aerosols via Nasal High-Flow Therapy in Adults with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma.
Fink, JB; Hadeer, M; Li, J; Luo, J; Zhao, M,
)
0.13
" Physical carrier and blend characterisation regarding particle size, morphology, density, shear cell testing and dosing behaviour were performed."( Particle engineered mannitol for carrier-based inhalation - A serious alternative?
Birk, G; Hertel, N; Scherließ, R, 2020
)
0.56
" Conventional dosage schemes used in public health to cure various diseases generally lead to undesirable side effects and renders the overall treatment ineffective."( An Efficient, Lung-Targeted, Drug-Delivery System To Treat Asthma Via Microparticles.
Al-Dhubiab, BE; Attimarad, M; Handral, M; Haroun, M; Hiremath, JG; Nair, AB; Ramnarayanan, C; Roopashree, TS; Shinu, P; SreeHarsha, N; Tratrat, C; Venugopala, KN, 2019
)
0.51
" For this reason, all beta2-agonists are currently on the Prohibited List issued by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), regardless of dosing route with some exemptions for inhaled salbutamol, formoterol, and salmeterol when used at therapeutic inhaled doses."( The salmeterol anomaly and the need for a urine threshold.
Hostrup, M; Jacobson, GA, 2022
)
0.72
" The observed differences may be caused by the difference in dosing between the two regimens."( Long-acting dual bronchodilator therapy (indacaterol/glycopyrronium) versus nebulized short-acting dual bronchodilator (salbutamol/ipratropium) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Carpaij, OA; Kerstjens, HAM; Niemeijer, A; Seigers, D; van Geffen, WH; Vonk, JM; Westbroek, LF, 2020
)
0.56
" Inhaled salbutamol was administered via a pressurized metered dosed inhaler with a valved holding chamber."( Effectiveness of hypertonic saline nebulization in airway clearance in children with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: A randomized control trial.
Anuradha, KWDA; Gunathilaka, PKG; Wickramasinghe, VP, 2021
)
0.62
" To prove the safety and efficacy of the dosage form, a new HPLC method for analysis of salbutamol sulfate impurities was developed and validated."( Development and validation of a HPLC method for quantifica-tion of degradation impurities of salbutamol sulfate with following long-term stability studies in multicomponent cough syrup.
Bezruk, I; Bunyatyan, V; Georgiyants, V; Gubar, S; Ivanauskas, L; Kovalenko, SM; Materiienko, A, 2020
)
0.56
"Our aim was to survey treatment practices used for preschool children with wheezing in emergency rooms (ER) focussing on inhalation device choice and handling, face mask use, salbutamol dosing and written instructions."( Heterogeneity of emergency treatment practices in wheezing preschool children.
Csonka, P; Lehtimäki, L; Mäkelä, MJ; Tapiainen, T, 2021
)
0.62
" MON, or combination of MFC, with no limitation of dosage or duration."( Efficacy and safety of salmeterol/fluticasone compared with montelukast alone (or add-on therapy to fluticasone) in the treatment of bronchial asthma in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hong, JG; Lu, J; Qin, Z; Zhou, XJ, 2021
)
0.62
"Beta 2 agonists are well known for their use in the treatment of asthma and COPD however in the last few years new indications of beta 2 agonist appeared like reduction of local fats and treatment of preterm labour which required the formulation of new dosage forms and administration strategies."( Optimization of two charge transfer reactions for colorimetric determination of two beta 2 agonist drugs, salmeterol xinafoate and salbutamol, in pharmaceutical and biological samples.
Abdelkawy, M; Salem, H; Samir, A, 2022
)
0.72
" We sought to determine how many children required escalation of care once placed on every 4-h dosing of albuterol."( Inpatient albuterol spacing as an indicator of discharge readiness.
Aoyama, B; Lee, B; Shen, BH, 2023
)
1.53
" Although systemic intake is banned, inhalation for asthma is permitted but with dosage restrictions."( Model-based meta-analysis of salbutamol pharmacokinetics and practical implications for doping control.
Biollaz, J; Buclin, T; Courlet, P; Guidi, M; Mazzoni, I; Rabin, O, 2022
)
0.72
"More than fifty years after the commercialization of the Ventolin metered-dose inhaler (MDI), its constituent active ingredient, salbutamol sulfate (SS), remains the most prescribed short-acting beta agonist for the first-line treatment of acute asthma attacks and the metered-dose inhaler remains its primary dosage form."( Development of an ethanol-free salbutamol sulfate metered-dose inhaler: Application of molecular dynamic simulation-based prediction of intermolecular interaction.
Abdelwahed, W; Aldabet, A; Alkhayer, M; Golgoun, S; Haroun, M; Miller, JF; Soltani, S, 2022
)
0.72
"The objective of the proposed work was to develop a rapid and new reverse phase ultra-performance liquid chromatographic (RP-UPLC) method for the simultaneous quantification of related impurities of ipratropium bromide and salbutamol sulfate in the combined inhalation dosage form."( Development of a rapid and validated stability-indicating UPLC-PDA method for concurrent quantification of impurity profiling and an assay of ipratropium bromide and salbutamol sulfate in inhalation dosage form.
Bapuji, AT; Kondra, S; Pawar, AKM; Shankar, PDS, 2023
)
0.91
" Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) models to guide paediatric dosing are lacking."( Optimising intravenous salbutamol in children: a phase 2 study.
Anderson, BJ; Kloprogge, F; Pan, S; Ramnarayan, P; Sheng, Y; Standing, JF; Walsh, S, 2023
)
0.91
" To selectively determine albuterol and budesonide in both pure and pharmaceutical dosage forms, two analytical methods were developed: the zero-order absorption method and the dual-wavelength method."( Development and validation of analytical methods for selective determination of albuterol and budesonide in Airsupra inhalation aerosol using spectrophotometry.
Almalki, AH; Almrasy, AA; Ramzy, S, 2023
)
1.44
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (4)

RoleDescription
bronchodilator agentAn agent that causes an increase in the expansion of a bronchus or bronchial tubes.
beta-adrenergic agonistAn agent that selectively binds to and activates beta-adrenergic receptors.
environmental contaminantAny minor or unwanted substance introduced into the environment that can have undesired effects.
xenobioticA xenobiotic (Greek, xenos "foreign"; bios "life") is a compound that is foreign to a living organism. Principal xenobiotics include: drugs, carcinogens and various compounds that have been introduced into the environment by artificial means.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (3)

ClassDescription
phenylethanolaminesAn ethanolamine compound having a phenyl (substituted or unsubstituted) group on the carbon bearing the hydroxy substituent.
secondary amino compoundA compound formally derived from ammonia by replacing two hydrogen atoms by organyl groups.
phenolsOrganic aromatic compounds having one or more hydroxy groups attached to a benzene or other arene ring.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (29)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
glp-1 receptor, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.01340.01846.806014.1254AID624148; AID743262
thioredoxin reductaseRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency3.23570.100020.879379.4328AID588453; AID588456
GLS proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency7.11080.35487.935539.8107AID624146; AID624170
regulator of G-protein signaling 4Homo sapiens (human)Potency13.38580.531815.435837.6858AID504845
estrogen-related nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.81520.001530.607315,848.9004AID1224841; AID1224842; AID1259401
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.38910.000229.305416,493.5996AID743075
arylsulfatase AHomo sapiens (human)Potency8.49211.069113.955137.9330AID720538
euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency49.48920.035520.977089.1251AID504332
thyroid stimulating hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.03980.001628.015177.1139AID1224843; AID1224895; AID1259393
flap endonuclease 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency8.43680.133725.412989.1251AID588795
peripheral myelin protein 22Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency9.07430.005612.367736.1254AID624032
ATP-dependent phosphofructokinaseTrypanosoma brucei brucei TREU927Potency0.06010.060110.745337.9330AID485368
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)711.00000.11007.190310.0000AID1443987; AID1449628; AID1473738
Beta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.26180.00020.93267.2000AID395056; AID625205; AID640201
Beta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.85120.00000.66359.5499AID1798855; AID395056; AID481516; AID625205
60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)100.00000.17004.559010.0000AID1594139
10 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)100.00000.17004.559010.0000AID1594139
Thiosulfate sulfurtransferaseHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)100.00000.06003.96319.7000AID1594135
60 kDa chaperonin Escherichia coliIC50 (µMol)175.00000.03903.55529.8000AID1594140; AID1594141
10 kDa chaperonin Escherichia coliIC50 (µMol)175.00000.03903.55529.8000AID1594140; AID1594141
Beta-2 adrenergic receptorCavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)Ki1.82800.00040.59022.5119AID481516
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
NPYLR7BAedes aegypti (yellow fever mosquito)EC50 (µMol)20.00000.03902.289918.3000AID1259426
Beta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.10880.00000.311110.0000AID1760529; AID1906919; AID481517; AID606103; AID640202
Beta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)Kd14.20620.00000.62888.9130AID1626022; AID1626023; AID1798580
Beta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.58580.00010.49146.0000AID1760528; AID1906920
Beta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)Kd23.13700.00010.803910.0000AID1798580
Beta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)Kd23.13700.00010.76318.9130AID1798580
Delta-type opioid receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)EC50 (µMol)0.00910.00050.36496.9000AID395059
Beta-2 adrenergic receptor Bos taurus (cattle)Kd0.52000.00061.47759.1200AID40694
Beta-2 adrenergic receptorCavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)EC50 (µMol)0.03860.00020.88438.2000AID395059; AID481517
Beta-2 adrenergic receptorCavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)Kd0.63480.00020.54774.4668AID1190659; AID426241
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Other Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Beta-2 adrenergic receptor Bos taurus (cattle)Concentration30.00001.00005.500010.0000AID40688
Beta-2 adrenergic receptor Bos taurus (cattle)KD app0.57000.03701.17744.4800AID40687
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (123)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
diet induced thermogenesisBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of sodium ion transportBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription by RNA polymerase IIBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
receptor-mediated endocytosisBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
smooth muscle contractionBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
activation of transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase activityBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-modulating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
endosome to lysosome transportBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to coldBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein kinase A signalingBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bone mineralizationBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
heat generationBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of multicellular organism growthBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
bone resorptionBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of smooth muscle contractionBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
brown fat cell differentiationBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mini excitatory postsynaptic potentialBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adrenergic receptor signaling pathwayBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating adrenergic receptor signaling pathwayBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein serine/threonine kinase activityBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of autophagosome maturationBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of lipophagyBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to amyloid-betaBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to psychosocial stressBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase activityBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of AMPA receptor activityBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine-epinephrine-mediated vasodilation involved in regulation of systemic arterial blood pressureBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of heart rate by epinephrine-norepinephrineBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of the force of heart contraction by epinephrine-norepinephrineBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
diet induced thermogenesisBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to coldBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
heat generationBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of multicellular organism growthBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
fear responseBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of circadian sleep/wake cycle, sleepBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
brown fat cell differentiationBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating adrenergic receptor signaling pathwayBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine-epinephrine-mediated vasodilation involved in regulation of systemic arterial blood pressureBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein folding60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
response to radiation60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
response to heat60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
virion assembly60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
chaperone cofactor-dependent protein refolding60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
protein refolding60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
chaperone cofactor-dependent protein refolding60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
response to heat60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
adhesion of symbiont to host60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of type II interferon production60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
T cell activation60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
MyD88-dependent toll-like receptor signaling pathway60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell mediated immune response to tumor cell60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
'de novo' protein folding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
activation of cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in apoptotic process60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
response to unfolded protein60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
response to cold60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interferon-alpha production60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of type II interferon production60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-10 production60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-12 production60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-6 production60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein refolding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
B cell proliferation60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
B cell activation60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of macrophage activation60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic process60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic process60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
isotype switching to IgG isotypes60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein stabilization60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell activation60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
chaperone-mediated protein complex assembly60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein maturation60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
biological process involved in interaction with symbiont60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interleukin-760 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
T cell activation60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein import into mitochondrial intermembrane space60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein folding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial unfolded protein response60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
apoptotic mitochondrial changes60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
receptor-mediated endocytosisBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
diet induced thermogenesisBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate metabolic processBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
generation of precursor metabolites and energyBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
energy reserve metabolic processBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-modulating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to coldBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
heat generationBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of multicellular organism growthBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
eating behaviorBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
brown fat cell differentiationBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating adrenergic receptor signaling pathwayBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine-epinephrine-mediated vasodilation involved in regulation of systemic arterial blood pressureBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
osteoblast differentiation10 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein folding10 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
activation of cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in apoptotic process10 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
response to unfolded protein10 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
chaperone cofactor-dependent protein refolding10 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
sulfur amino acid catabolic processThiosulfate sulfurtransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
cyanate catabolic processThiosulfate sulfurtransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell differentiationThiosulfate sulfurtransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
rRNA import into mitochondrionThiosulfate sulfurtransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
rRNA transportThiosulfate sulfurtransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
receptor-mediated endocytosisBeta-2 adrenergic receptor Bos taurus (cattle)
regulation of smooth muscle contractionBeta-2 adrenergic receptor Bos taurus (cattle)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeBeta-2 adrenergic receptor Bos taurus (cattle)
negative regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayBeta-2 adrenergic receptor Bos taurus (cattle)
adenylate cyclase-activating adrenergic receptor signaling pathwayBeta-2 adrenergic receptor Bos taurus (cattle)
positive regulation of autophagosome maturationBeta-2 adrenergic receptor Bos taurus (cattle)
positive regulation of lipophagyBeta-2 adrenergic receptor Bos taurus (cattle)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (62)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
amyloid-beta bindingBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta2-adrenergic receptor activityBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase bindingBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
potassium channel regulator activityBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex bindingBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine bindingBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta-adrenergic receptor activityBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta1-adrenergic receptor activityBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
PDZ domain bindingBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
alpha-2A adrenergic receptor bindingBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled neurotransmitter receptor activity involved in regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
magnesium ion binding60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
protein binding60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
ATP binding60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
isomerase activity60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
ATP hydrolysis activity60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
identical protein binding60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
unfolded protein binding60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
ATP-dependent protein folding chaperone60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
lipopolysaccharide binding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
p53 binding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
DNA replication origin binding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
single-stranded DNA binding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
RNA binding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
double-stranded RNA binding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein binding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
ATP binding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
high-density lipoprotein particle binding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
isomerase activity60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activity60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme binding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase binding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
apolipoprotein binding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
apolipoprotein A-I binding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
unfolded protein binding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone binding60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
ATP-dependent protein folding chaperone60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine bindingBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta-adrenergic receptor activityBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta3-adrenergic receptor activityBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta-3 adrenergic receptor bindingBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
epinephrine bindingBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA binding10 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein binding10 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
ATP binding10 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein folding chaperone10 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
unfolded protein binding10 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone binding10 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion binding10 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
thiosulfate sulfurtransferase activityThiosulfate sulfurtransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
5S rRNA bindingThiosulfate sulfurtransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase activityThiosulfate sulfurtransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
beta2-adrenergic receptor activityBeta-2 adrenergic receptor Bos taurus (cattle)
protein homodimerization activityBeta-2 adrenergic receptor Bos taurus (cattle)
norepinephrine bindingBeta-2 adrenergic receptor Bos taurus (cattle)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (40)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
lysosomeBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
early endosomeBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
endosome membraneBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
clathrin-coated endocytic vesicle membraneBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal dense core vesicleBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
receptor complexBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
early endosomeBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Schaffer collateral - CA1 synapseBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal dense core vesicleBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasm60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
cytosol60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
membrane60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
GroEL-GroES complex60 kDa chaperoninEscherichia coli K-12
mitochondrial matrix60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular space60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasm60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrion60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial inner membrane60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrix60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
early endosome60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
cytosol60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
clathrin-coated pit60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
membrane60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
coated vesicle60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
secretory granule60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosome60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
sperm midpiece60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
sperm plasma membrane60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
migrasome60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
lipopolysaccharide receptor complex60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial inner membrane60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
receptor complexBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrion10 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
membrane10 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosome10 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrix10 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceThiosulfate sulfurtransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionThiosulfate sulfurtransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixThiosulfate sulfurtransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionThiosulfate sulfurtransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
early endosomeBeta-2 adrenergic receptor Bos taurus (cattle)
Golgi apparatusBeta-2 adrenergic receptor Bos taurus (cattle)
receptor complexBeta-2 adrenergic receptor Bos taurus (cattle)
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (265)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1594141Inhibition of Escherichia coli GroEL expressed in Escherichia coliDH5alpha/Escherichia coli GroES expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) assessed as reduction in GroEL/GroES-mediated denatured soluble pig heart MDH refolding by measuring MDH enzyme acti2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 05-01, Volume: 29, Issue:9
HSP60/10 chaperonin systems are inhibited by a variety of approved drugs, natural products, and known bioactive molecules.
AID1760528Agonist activity at human beta1 adrenoceptor expressed in CHO cells assessed as increase in intracellular cAMP level incubated for 1 hr by alphascreen technology2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Recent Advances in β
AID497005Antimicrobial activity against Pneumocystis carinii2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID496829Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania infantum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID481516Displacement of [125I]cyanopindolol from human recombinant beta2 adrenergic receptor expressed in CHO cells by filtration assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
The identification of indacaterol as an ultralong-acting inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonist.
AID425653Renal clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID16044The ability binding to plasma (Binding classified based on injection of compound at 80 concentration.)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-18, Volume: 43, Issue:10
Biosensor analysis of the interaction between immobilized human serum albumin and drug compounds for prediction of human serum albumin binding levels.
AID588219FDA HLAED, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1146065Intrinsic activity at beta-adrenoceptor in guinea pig trachea assessed as relaxation of spontaneously contracted tracheal smooth muscle relative to papaverine1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 20, Issue:8
Adrenergic agents. 6. Synthesis and potential beta-adrenergic agonist activity of some meta-substituted p-hydroxyphenylethanolamines related to salbutamol.
AID481513Binding affinity to human serum albumin by UV/HPLC analysis2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
The identification of indacaterol as an ultralong-acting inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonist.
AID444055Fraction absorbed in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1137785Agonist activity at beta-2 adrenergic receptor in guinea pig tracheal rings assessed as time required to reach 90% of final relaxation of methacholine-constricted tracheal rings2014ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-10, Volume: 5, Issue:4
Discovery of AZD3199, An Inhaled Ultralong Acting β2 Receptor Agonist with Rapid Onset of Action.
AID24177log(1/ISA) value of the compound1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 29, Issue:4
Quantitative evaluation of the beta 2-adrenoceptor intrinsic activity of N-tert-butylphenylethanolamines.
AID29359Ionization constant (pKa)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID588216FDA HLAED, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1906924Bronchodilatory activity in rabbit model assessed as inhibition of acetylcholine-induced bronchoconstriction at 3 ug/kg, iv measured after 1 min by Konzett-Roessler methodology relative to control
AID1636357Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 300 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of NA2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID1594135Inhibition of native rhodanese (unknown origin) assessed as reduction in rhodanese enzyme activity after 45 mins by Fe(SCN)3 dye based spectrometric analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 05-01, Volume: 29, Issue:9
HSP60/10 chaperonin systems are inhibited by a variety of approved drugs, natural products, and known bioactive molecules.
AID40690Beta-2 adrenergic receptor intrinsic symphaticomimetic activity relative to salbutamol1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 29, Issue:4
Quantitative evaluation of the beta 2-adrenoceptor intrinsic activity of N-tert-butylphenylethanolamines.
AID481519Agonist activity at beta2 adrenergic receptor in guinea pig tracheal strip assessed as inhibition of electrically-induced bronchocontractile response after 30 mins2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
The identification of indacaterol as an ultralong-acting inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonist.
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1774075Inhibition of 8-anilinonaphthalene-l-sulfonic acid binding to TTR V3OM mutant (unknown origin) expressed in Escherichia coli assessed as ANS saturation ratio at 400 uM incubated for 1 hr in presence of 7.5 uM ANS by fluorescence method (Rvb = 56 +/- 2.3%)2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-14, Volume: 64, Issue:19
Repositioning of the Anthelmintic Drugs Bithionol and Triclabendazole as Transthyretin Amyloidogenesis Inhibitors.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID588214FDA HLAED, liver enzyme composite activity2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID1449628Inhibition of human BSEP expressed in baculovirus transfected fall armyworm Sf21 cell membranes vesicles assessed as reduction in ATP-dependent [3H]-taurocholate transport into vesicles incubated for 5 mins by Topcount based rapid filtration method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Dec, Volume: 40, Issue:12
Mitigating the inhibition of human bile salt export pump by drugs: opportunities provided by physicochemical property modulation, in silico modeling, and structural modification.
AID1223486Intrinsic clearance in human hepatocytes from chimeric mouse with humanized liver assessed per 10'6 cells at 10 uM after 0.25 to 2 hrs by LC-MS/MS method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Prediction of in vivo hepatic clearance and half-life of drug candidates in human using chimeric mice with humanized liver.
AID625278FDA Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base Benchmark Dataset (LTKB-BD) drugs of no concern for DILI2011Drug discovery today, Aug, Volume: 16, Issue:15-16
FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID40687Apparent binding affinity constant to beta-2 adrenergic receptor determined using [3H]DHA1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 29, Issue:4
Quantitative evaluation of the beta 2-adrenoceptor intrinsic activity of N-tert-butylphenylethanolamines.
AID1906929Bronchodilatory activity in rabbit model assessed as inhibition of acetylcholine-induced bronchoconstriction at 9 ug/kg, iv measured after 45 mins by Konzett-Roessler methodology relative to control
AID496830Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania major2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1190659Agonist activity at adrenergic beta2 receptor in Hartley guinea pig tracheal ring at basal tone assessed as bronchorelaxation activity2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 25, Issue:4
Insights on the role of boron containing moieties in the design of new potent and efficient agonists targeting the β2 adrenoceptor.
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1443992Total Cmax in human administered as single dose2014Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), Sep, Volume: 60, Issue:3
Human drug-induced liver injury severity is highly associated with dual inhibition of liver mitochondrial function and bile salt export pump.
AID1774076Inhibition of 8-anilinonaphthalene-l-sulfonic acid binding to TTR V3OM mutant (unknown origin) expressed in Escherichia coli at 400 uM incubated for 1 hr in presence of 75 uM ANS by fluorescence method (Rvb = 91 +/- 0.92%)2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-14, Volume: 64, Issue:19
Repositioning of the Anthelmintic Drugs Bithionol and Triclabendazole as Transthyretin Amyloidogenesis Inhibitors.
AID1906920Agonist activity at beta1 adrenoceptor (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as cAMP accumulation incubated for 60 mins by microplate reader analysis
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID1906928Bronchodilatory activity in rabbit model assessed as inhibition of acetylcholine-induced bronchoconstriction at 1 ug/kg, iv measured after 30 mins by Konzett-Roessler methodology relative to control
AID1594137Inhibition of ATPase activity of Escherichia coli GroEL expressed in Escherichia coliDH5alpha incubated for 60 mins using ATP by spectrometric analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 05-01, Volume: 29, Issue:9
HSP60/10 chaperonin systems are inhibited by a variety of approved drugs, natural products, and known bioactive molecules.
AID467613Volume of distribution at steady state in human2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 44, Issue:11
Prediction of volume of distribution values in human using immobilized artificial membrane partitioning coefficients, the fraction of compound ionized and plasma protein binding data.
AID129460Bronchosecretory activity measured as tracheal secretion of phenol red in mouse after oral administration1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 30, Issue:3
2-[(3-Pyridinylmethyl)thio]pyrimidine derivatives: new bronchosecretolytic agents.
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1137808Toxicity in iv dosed guinea pig assessed as change in plasma potassium level up to 60 mins2014ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-10, Volume: 5, Issue:4
Discovery of AZD3199, An Inhaled Ultralong Acting β2 Receptor Agonist with Rapid Onset of Action.
AID771315Cellular uptake in human HEK293 cells assessed as human OCT1-mediated drug transport at 2.5 uM after 4 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis relative to passive uptake2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-26, Volume: 56, Issue:18
Identification of novel substrates and structure-activity relationship of cellular uptake mediated by human organic cation transporters 1 and 2.
AID496827Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania amazonensis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID444053Renal clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID588217FDA HLAED, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID77612Intrinsic activity measured on Guinea pig tracheal spiral strips.1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 33, Issue:11
Relaxant activity of 4-amido-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran-3-ols and 4-amido-2H-1-benzopyrans on guinea pig isolated trachealis.
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID588218FDA HLAED, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID444050Fraction unbound in human plasma2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID426144Agonist activity at adrenergic beta2 receptor in Hartley guinea pig tracheal ring assessed as bronchorelaxation activity against carbachol-induced contraction2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 44, Issue:7
Synthesis, pharmacological and in silico evaluation of 1-(4-di-hydroxy-3,5-dioxa-4-borabicyclo[4.4.0]deca-7,9,11-trien-9-yl)-2-(tert-butylamino)ethanol, a compound designed to act as a beta2 adrenoceptor agonist.
AID1906926Bronchodilatory activity in rabbit model assessed as inhibition of acetylcholine-induced bronchoconstriction at 9 ug/kg, iv measured after 30 mins by Konzett-Roessler methodology relative to control
AID496831Antimicrobial activity against Cryptosporidium parvum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID771316Cellular uptake in human HEK293 cells assessed as human OCT2-mediated drug transport at 2.5 uM after 4 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-26, Volume: 56, Issue:18
Identification of novel substrates and structure-activity relationship of cellular uptake mediated by human organic cation transporters 1 and 2.
AID640202Agonist activity at recombinant human beta2-adrenoceptor expressed in whole cells assessed as cAMP accumulation by homogeneous radioimmunoassay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-15, Volume: 22, Issue:2
A multivalent approach to the discovery of long-acting β(2)-adrenoceptor agonists for the treatment of asthma and COPD.
AID1146181Agonist activity at beta-1 adrenergic receptor in guinea pig right atria assessed as increase in contraction rate of spontaneously beating right atria1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 20, Issue:10
Adrenergic agents. 8.1 Synthesis and beta-adrenergic agonist activity of some 3-tert-butylamino-2-(substituted phenyl)-1-propanols.
AID481520Agonist activity at beta2 adrenergic receptor in guinea pig tracheal strip assessed as time required to reach maximal inhibition of electrically-induced bronchoconstriction2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
The identification of indacaterol as an ultralong-acting inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonist.
AID1137784Agonist activity at beta-2 adrenergic receptor in human bronchial rings assessed as time required to reach 90% of final relaxation of carbachol-constricted bronchial rings2014ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-10, Volume: 5, Issue:4
Discovery of AZD3199, An Inhaled Ultralong Acting β2 Receptor Agonist with Rapid Onset of Action.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1594145Inhibition of Escherichia coli GroEL expressed in Escherichia coli DH5alpha/Escherichia coli GroES expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) assessed as reduction in GroEL/GroES-mediated denatured rhodanese refolding by measuring rhodanese enzyme activity 2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 05-01, Volume: 29, Issue:9
HSP60/10 chaperonin systems are inhibited by a variety of approved drugs, natural products, and known bioactive molecules.
AID1774079Stabilization of TTR V3OM mutant (unknown origin) assessed as acid-mediated protein aggregation inhibition ratio at 10 uM incubated for 1 week by absorbance method2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-14, Volume: 64, Issue:19
Repositioning of the Anthelmintic Drugs Bithionol and Triclabendazole as Transthyretin Amyloidogenesis Inhibitors.
AID513146Binding affinity to human beta-2 adrenergic receptor delta 5-C271 mutant expressed in Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 cells2006Nature chemical biology, Aug, Volume: 2, Issue:8
Coupling ligand structure to specific conformational switches in the beta2-adrenoceptor.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1626022Displacement of [3H]DHA from inactive/G protein-uncoupled human beta2-AR expressed in CHO cell membranes by liquid scintillation counting2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-23, Volume: 59, Issue:12
Uncoupling the Structure-Activity Relationships of β2 Adrenergic Receptor Ligands from Membrane Binding.
AID503294Agonist activity at beta-2-adrenergic receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as induction of receptor interaction with beta-arrestin by EYFP based reporter gene assay2006Nature chemical biology, Jun, Volume: 2, Issue:6
Identifying off-target effects and hidden phenotypes of drugs in human cells.
AID1906925Bronchodilatory activity in rabbit model assessed as inhibition of acetylcholine-induced bronchoconstriction at 1 ug/kg, iv measured after 1 min by Konzett-Roessler methodology relative to control
AID41888Tested for intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA); Agonist1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 31, Issue:11
Modeling of beta-adrenoceptors based on molecular electrostatic potential studies of agonists and antagonists.
AID40694Affinity for cow beta-2 adrenergic receptor by measuring displacement (-)-[3H]dihydroalprenolol (DHA)1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 28, Issue:9
Quantitative evaluation of the beta 2-adrenoceptor affinity of phenoxypropanolamines and phenylethanolamines.
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID1146180Agonist activity at beta-2 adrenergic receptor in guinea pig tracheal chain assessed as relaxation of spontaneously contracted tracheal smooth muscle1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 20, Issue:10
Adrenergic agents. 8.1 Synthesis and beta-adrenergic agonist activity of some 3-tert-butylamino-2-(substituted phenyl)-1-propanols.
AID496828Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania donovani2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1146185Intrinsic activity at beta-2 adrenergic receptor in guinea pig tracheal chain assessed as relaxation of spontaneously contracted tracheal smooth muscle relative to papaverine1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 20, Issue:10
Adrenergic agents. 8.1 Synthesis and beta-adrenergic agonist activity of some 3-tert-butylamino-2-(substituted phenyl)-1-propanols.
AID1223483Unbound fraction in iv dosed human plasma2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Prediction of in vivo hepatic clearance and half-life of drug candidates in human using chimeric mice with humanized liver.
AID1123872Inhibition of histamine-induced asthma-like syndrome in guinea pig assessed as time delay in appearance of anoxia at 1.25 mg/kg, po treated 30 mins before histamine challenge (Rvb = 5.08 mins)1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 22, Issue:3
New bronchodilators. Synthesis and bronchodilating activity of some 3-(alkoxymethyl)-alpha-(N-substituted aminomethyl)-4-hydroxybenzyl alcohols.
AID1774078Stabilization of TTR V3OM mutant (unknown origin) assessed as acid-mediated protein aggregation inhibition ratio at 4 uM incubated for 1 week by absorbance method2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-14, Volume: 64, Issue:19
Repositioning of the Anthelmintic Drugs Bithionol and Triclabendazole as Transthyretin Amyloidogenesis Inhibitors.
AID1873863Displacement of [3H]-CGP12,177 from immobilized Halo tag-fused beta2 adrenoceptor (unknown origin) expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3)
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID1443987Inhibition of recombinant human BSEP expressed in baculovirus infected sf21 cell membrane vesicles assessed as reduction in ATP-dependent [3H]-taurocholate uptake in to vesicles after 5 mins by TopCount method2014Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), Sep, Volume: 60, Issue:3
Human drug-induced liver injury severity is highly associated with dual inhibition of liver mitochondrial function and bile salt export pump.
AID1636356Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2C9-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 300 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of NA2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID496824Antimicrobial activity against Toxoplasma gondii2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1223477Total clearance in iv dosed human2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Prediction of in vivo hepatic clearance and half-life of drug candidates in human using chimeric mice with humanized liver.
AID588215FDA HLAED, alkaline phosphatase increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1626024Binding affinity to inactive/G protein-uncoupled human beta2-AR by immobilized artificial membrane HPLC analysis2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-23, Volume: 59, Issue:12
Uncoupling the Structure-Activity Relationships of β2 Adrenergic Receptor Ligands from Membrane Binding.
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1906919Agonist activity at beta2 adrenoceptor (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as cAMP accumulation incubated for 60 mins by microplate reader analysis
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID1906921Selectivity ratio of EC50 for beta1 adrenoceptor (unknown orgin) expressed in HEK293 cells to EC50 for human beta2 adrenoceptor (unknown orgin) expressed in HEK293 cells
AID395056Displacement of [3H]CGP1217 from human recombinant adrenergic beta2 receptor transfected in insect Sf9 cells by scintillation counting2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 52, Issue:6
Synthesis and pharmacological characterization of beta2-adrenergic agonist enantiomers: zilpaterol.
AID444052Hepatic clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID513152Partial agonist activity at human biamane labelled beta-2 adrenergic receptor delta 5-C271/Trp135 mutant assessed as bimane response by fluorescence spectroscopy2006Nature chemical biology, Aug, Volume: 2, Issue:8
Coupling ligand structure to specific conformational switches in the beta2-adrenoceptor.
AID426234Agonist activity at adrenergic beta2 receptor in Hartley guinea pig tracheal ring assessed as bronchorelaxation activity against histamine-induced contraction2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 44, Issue:7
Synthesis, pharmacological and in silico evaluation of 1-(4-di-hydroxy-3,5-dioxa-4-borabicyclo[4.4.0]deca-7,9,11-trien-9-yl)-2-(tert-butylamino)ethanol, a compound designed to act as a beta2 adrenoceptor agonist.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID1223478Total clearance in chimeric mouse with humanized liver at 3 mg/kg, iv by LC-MS/MS method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Prediction of in vivo hepatic clearance and half-life of drug candidates in human using chimeric mice with humanized liver.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID395059Agonist activity at adrenergic beta2 receptor in guinea pig trachea assessed as relaxation of carbachol-induced tissue contraction2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 52, Issue:6
Synthesis and pharmacological characterization of beta2-adrenergic agonist enantiomers: zilpaterol.
AID1906989Bronchodilatory activity in iv dosed rabbit model assessed as inhibition of acetylcholine-induced bronchoconstriction measured after 1 min by Konzett-Roessler methodology relative to control
AID496823Antimicrobial activity against Trichomonas vaginalis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID1443995Hepatotoxicity in human assessed as drug-induced liver injury2014Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), Sep, Volume: 60, Issue:3
Human drug-induced liver injury severity is highly associated with dual inhibition of liver mitochondrial function and bile salt export pump.
AID444054Oral bioavailability in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1906923Bronchodilatory activity in rabbit model assessed as inhibition of acetylcholine-induced bronchoconstriction at 9 ug/kg, iv measured after 1 min by Konzett-Roessler methodology relative to control
AID27167Delta logD (logD6.5 - logD7.4)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID1594139Inhibition of human N-terminal octa-His-tagged HSP60 expressed in Escherichia coli Rosetta(DE3) pLysS/human HSP10 expressed in Escherichia coli Rosetta(DE3) assessed as reduction in HSP60/HSP10-mediated denatured MDH refolding by measuring MDH enzyme acti2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 05-01, Volume: 29, Issue:9
HSP60/10 chaperonin systems are inhibited by a variety of approved drugs, natural products, and known bioactive molecules.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID481518Agonist activity at human beta2 adrenergic receptor assessed as increase in cAMP level by whole cell assay relative to formoterol2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
The identification of indacaterol as an ultralong-acting inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonist.
AID513154Binding affinity to human beta-2 adrenergic receptor delta 5-C271/W135 mutant expressed in Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 cells2006Nature chemical biology, Aug, Volume: 2, Issue:8
Coupling ligand structure to specific conformational switches in the beta2-adrenoceptor.
AID76393Inhibition of spontaneous tone in Guinea pig tracheal spiral strips.1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 33, Issue:11
Relaxant activity of 4-amido-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran-3-ols and 4-amido-2H-1-benzopyrans on guinea pig isolated trachealis.
AID481512Chromatographic hydrophobicity index at 2 mg/ml at pH 7.4 by rapid gradient HPLC analysis2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
The identification of indacaterol as an ultralong-acting inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonist.
AID513148Agonist activity at human Beta-2 adrenergic receptor delta 5-C271/Trp135 mutant assessed as decrease in bimane fluorescence intensity by fluorescence spectroscopy2006Nature chemical biology, Aug, Volume: 2, Issue:8
Coupling ligand structure to specific conformational switches in the beta2-adrenoceptor.
AID218847Change in Gibb's free energy at High affinity beta2- adrenoceptor in Chang living cells.1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 31, Issue:6
Mapping of the beta 2-adrenoceptor on Chang liver cells. Differences between high- and low-affinity receptor states.
AID1190661Agonist activity at adrenergic beta2 receptor in Hartley guinea pig tracheal ring assessed as bronchorelaxation activity against histamine-induced contraction relative to isoproterenol2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 25, Issue:4
Insights on the role of boron containing moieties in the design of new potent and efficient agonists targeting the β2 adrenoceptor.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1146179Selectivity ratio of ED25 for beta-adrenergic receptor in guinea pig right atrial muscle to ED50 for beta-adrenergic receptor in guinea pig tracheal tissue1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 20, Issue:10
Adrenerigic agents. 7.1 Synthesis and beta-adrenergic agonist activity of several 2-pyridylethanolamines.
AID496825Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania mexicana2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID24440Calculated partition coefficient (clogP)1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 29, Issue:4
Quantitative evaluation of the beta 2-adrenoceptor intrinsic activity of N-tert-butylphenylethanolamines.
AID41488Selectivity for beta-2 adrenergic receptor1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 31, Issue:11
Modeling of beta-adrenoceptors based on molecular electrostatic potential studies of agonists and antagonists.
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID771317Cellular uptake in human HEK293 cells assessed as human OCT1-mediated drug transport at 2.5 uM after 4 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-26, Volume: 56, Issue:18
Identification of novel substrates and structure-activity relationship of cellular uptake mediated by human organic cation transporters 1 and 2.
AID1137786Agonist activity at beta-2 adrenergic receptor in guinea pig tracheal rings assessed as relaxation of methacholine-constricted tracheal rings2014ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-10, Volume: 5, Issue:4
Discovery of AZD3199, An Inhaled Ultralong Acting β2 Receptor Agonist with Rapid Onset of Action.
AID40688Concentration required for maximal (95-100%) beta-2 adrenergic receptor occupancy1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 29, Issue:4
Quantitative evaluation of the beta 2-adrenoceptor intrinsic activity of N-tert-butylphenylethanolamines.
AID1223475Elimination half life in chimeric mouse with humanized liver at 3 mg/kg, iv by LC-MS/MS method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Prediction of in vivo hepatic clearance and half-life of drug candidates in human using chimeric mice with humanized liver.
AID1223481Elimination half life iv dosed human2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Prediction of in vivo hepatic clearance and half-life of drug candidates in human using chimeric mice with humanized liver.
AID1123873Inhibition of histamine-induced asthma-like syndrome in guinea pig assessed as time delay in appearance of anoxia at 5 mg/kg, po treated 30 mins before histamine challenge (Rvb = 5.08 mins)1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 22, Issue:3
New bronchodilators. Synthesis and bronchodilating activity of some 3-(alkoxymethyl)-alpha-(N-substituted aminomethyl)-4-hydroxybenzyl alcohols.
AID606104Intrinsic activity at human adrenergic beta2 receptor expressed in H292 cells assessed as intracellular cAMP accumulation after 1 hr relative to formoterol2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-01, Volume: 21, Issue:13
Design driven HtL: The discovery and synthesis of new high efficacy β₂-agonists.
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID40536Selectivity towards beta-1 adrenergic receptor; Nonselective towards beta-1 adrenoceptor1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 31, Issue:11
Modeling of beta-adrenoceptors based on molecular electrostatic potential studies of agonists and antagonists.
AID496826Antimicrobial activity against Entamoeba histolytica2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1146066Intrinsic activity at beta-adrenoceptor in guinea pig atria assessed as cardiac stimulant activity by measuring change in rate of contraction of right atrial muscle relative to isoproterenol1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 20, Issue:8
Adrenergic agents. 6. Synthesis and potential beta-adrenergic agonist activity of some meta-substituted p-hydroxyphenylethanolamines related to salbutamol.
AID503306Antiproliferative activity against human PC3 cells at 2 uM after 120 hrs by MTT assay relative to DMSO2006Nature chemical biology, Jun, Volume: 2, Issue:6
Identifying off-target effects and hidden phenotypes of drugs in human cells.
AID1906931Bronchodilatory activity in rabbit model assessed as inhibition of acetylcholine-induced bronchoconstriction at 1 ug/kg, iv measured after 45 mins by Konzett-Roessler methodology relative to control
AID29812Oral bioavailability in human2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID28681Partition coefficient (logD6.5)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID467611Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 44, Issue:11
Prediction of volume of distribution values in human using immobilized artificial membrane partitioning coefficients, the fraction of compound ionized and plasma protein binding data.
AID426240Agonist activity at adrenergic beta2 receptor in Hartley guinea pig tracheal ring assessed as bronchorelaxation activity against histamine-induced contraction in presence of ICI-1185512009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 44, Issue:7
Synthesis, pharmacological and in silico evaluation of 1-(4-di-hydroxy-3,5-dioxa-4-borabicyclo[4.4.0]deca-7,9,11-trien-9-yl)-2-(tert-butylamino)ethanol, a compound designed to act as a beta2 adrenoceptor agonist.
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID1146183Intrinsic activity at beta-1 adrenergic receptor in guinea pig right atria assessed as increase in contraction rate of spontaneously beating right atria relative to isoproterenol1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 20, Issue:10
Adrenergic agents. 8.1 Synthesis and beta-adrenergic agonist activity of some 3-tert-butylamino-2-(substituted phenyl)-1-propanols.
AID481521Agonist activity at beta2 adrenergic receptor in guinea pig tracheal strip assessed as duration of maximal inhibitory action against electrically-induced bronchoconstriction2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
The identification of indacaterol as an ultralong-acting inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonist.
AID1137783Intrinsic activity at beta-2 adrenergic receptor in guinea pig tracheal rings2014ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-10, Volume: 5, Issue:4
Discovery of AZD3199, An Inhaled Ultralong Acting β2 Receptor Agonist with Rapid Onset of Action.
AID1146056Agonist activity at beta-adrenoceptor in guinea pig trachea assessed as relaxation of spontaneously contracted tracheal smooth muscle1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 20, Issue:8
Adrenergic agents. 6. Synthesis and potential beta-adrenergic agonist activity of some meta-substituted p-hydroxyphenylethanolamines related to salbutamol.
AID444058Volume of distribution at steady state in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1906939Relaxant activity in guinea pig smooth muscle cells assessed as decrease in intracellular calcium level at 1 umol/L incubated for 5 mins by Flura2AM staining based fluorescence assay
AID444057Fraction escaping hepatic elimination in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1636440Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2D6-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 300 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of NA2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID444051Total clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1123875Inhibition of histamine-induced asthma-like syndrome in guinea pig assessed as time delay in appearance of coughing at 5 mg/kg, po treated 30 mins before histamine challenge (Rvb = 6.13 mins)1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 22, Issue:3
New bronchodilators. Synthesis and bronchodilating activity of some 3-(alkoxymethyl)-alpha-(N-substituted aminomethyl)-4-hydroxybenzyl alcohols.
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID1190660Agonist activity at adrenergic beta2 receptor in Hartley guinea pig tracheal ring assessed as bronchorelaxation activity against histamine-induced contraction2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 25, Issue:4
Insights on the role of boron containing moieties in the design of new potent and efficient agonists targeting the β2 adrenoceptor.
AID1873862Binding affinity to immobilized Halo tag-fused beta2 adrenoceptor (unknown origin) expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) assessed as retention time by chromatographic analysis
AID426239Agonist activity at adrenergic beta2 receptor in Hartley guinea pig tracheal ring assessed as bronchorelaxation activity against histamine-induced contraction in presence of propranolol2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 44, Issue:7
Synthesis, pharmacological and in silico evaluation of 1-(4-di-hydroxy-3,5-dioxa-4-borabicyclo[4.4.0]deca-7,9,11-trien-9-yl)-2-(tert-butylamino)ethanol, a compound designed to act as a beta2 adrenoceptor agonist.
AID481517Agonist activity at human beta2 adrenergic receptor assessed as increase in cAMP level by whole cell assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
The identification of indacaterol as an ultralong-acting inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonist.
AID1626023Displacement of [3H]DHA from inactive/G protein-uncoupled human beta2-AR expressed in CHO cell membranes assessed as intrinsic Kd by liquid scintillation counting2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-23, Volume: 59, Issue:12
Uncoupling the Structure-Activity Relationships of β2 Adrenergic Receptor Ligands from Membrane Binding.
AID640201Displacement of [3H]dihydroalprenolol from beta2-adrenoceptor after 90 mins by liquid scintillation counting2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-15, Volume: 22, Issue:2
A multivalent approach to the discovery of long-acting β(2)-adrenoceptor agonists for the treatment of asthma and COPD.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1146059Agonist activity at beta-adrenoceptor in guinea pig atria assessed as cardiac stimulant activity by measuring change in rate of contraction of right atrial muscle1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 20, Issue:8
Adrenergic agents. 6. Synthesis and potential beta-adrenergic agonist activity of some meta-substituted p-hydroxyphenylethanolamines related to salbutamol.
AID1906930Bronchodilatory activity in rabbit model assessed as inhibition of acetylcholine-induced bronchoconstriction at 3 ug/kg, iv measured after 45 mins by Konzett-Roessler methodology relative to control
AID409954Inhibition of mouse brain MAOA2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 51, Issue:21
Quantitative structure-activity relationship and complex network approach to monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors.
AID426238Agonist activity at adrenergic beta2 receptor in Hartley guinea pig tracheal ring assessed as maximum bronchorelaxation activity against carbachol-induced contraction at 100 uM2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 44, Issue:7
Synthesis, pharmacological and in silico evaluation of 1-(4-di-hydroxy-3,5-dioxa-4-borabicyclo[4.4.0]deca-7,9,11-trien-9-yl)-2-(tert-butylamino)ethanol, a compound designed to act as a beta2 adrenoceptor agonist.
AID496832Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1146184Selectivity ratio of ED25 for beta-1 adrenergic receptor in guinea pig right atria to ED50 for beta-2 adrenergic receptor in guinea pig tracheal chain1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 20, Issue:10
Adrenergic agents. 8.1 Synthesis and beta-adrenergic agonist activity of some 3-tert-butylamino-2-(substituted phenyl)-1-propanols.
AID496821Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID496818Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei brucei2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1594140Inhibition of Escherichia coli GroEL expressed in Escherichia coli DH5alpha/Escherichia coli GroES expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) assessed as reduction in GroEL/GroES-mediated denatured rhodanese refolding by measuring rhodanese enzyme activity 2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 05-01, Volume: 29, Issue:9
HSP60/10 chaperonin systems are inhibited by a variety of approved drugs, natural products, and known bioactive molecules.
AID218845Change in Gibb's free energy at Low affinity beta-2-adrenoceptor in the membranes of bovine skeletal muscle preparation1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 31, Issue:6
Mapping of the beta 2-adrenoceptor on Chang liver cells. Differences between high- and low-affinity receptor states.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID40686Affinity for cow beta-2 adrenergic receptor by measuring displacement (-)-[3H]dihydroalprenolol (DHA)1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 28, Issue:9
Quantitative evaluation of the beta 2-adrenoceptor affinity of phenoxypropanolamines and phenylethanolamines.
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID496817Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma cruzi2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID521220Inhibition of neurosphere proliferation of mouse neural precursor cells by MTT assay2007Nature chemical biology, May, Volume: 3, Issue:5
Chemical genetics reveals a complex functional ground state of neural stem cells.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1146178Intrinsic activity at beta-adrenergic receptor in guinea pig right atrial muscle assessed as rate of contraction of spontaneously beating atria relative to isoproterenol1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 20, Issue:10
Adrenerigic agents. 7.1 Synthesis and beta-adrenergic agonist activity of several 2-pyridylethanolamines.
AID1443991Induction of mitochondrial dysfunction in Sprague-Dawley rat liver mitochondria assessed as inhibition of mitochondrial respiration per mg mitochondrial protein measured for 20 mins by A65N-1 oxygen probe based fluorescence assay2014Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), Sep, Volume: 60, Issue:3
Human drug-induced liver injury severity is highly associated with dual inhibition of liver mitochondrial function and bile salt export pump.
AID426241Binding affinity to adrenergic beta2 receptor in Hartley guinea pig tracheal ring2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 44, Issue:7
Synthesis, pharmacological and in silico evaluation of 1-(4-di-hydroxy-3,5-dioxa-4-borabicyclo[4.4.0]deca-7,9,11-trien-9-yl)-2-(tert-butylamino)ethanol, a compound designed to act as a beta2 adrenoceptor agonist.
AID40695Intrinsic activity was measured as concentration of beta-2 adrenergic receptor agonist required for cAMP production1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 29, Issue:4
Quantitative evaluation of the beta 2-adrenoceptor intrinsic activity of N-tert-butylphenylethanolamines.
AID467612Fraction unbound in human plasma2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 44, Issue:11
Prediction of volume of distribution values in human using immobilized artificial membrane partitioning coefficients, the fraction of compound ionized and plasma protein binding data.
AID496819Antimicrobial activity against Plasmodium falciparum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1760529Agonist activity at human beta2 adrenoceptor expressed in CHO cells assessed as increase in intracellular cAMP level incubated for 1 hr by alphascreen technology2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-24, Volume: 63, Issue:24
Recent Advances in β
AID1594144Inhibition of Escherichia coli GroEL expressed in Escherichia coliDH5alpha/Escherichia coli GroES expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) assessed as reduction in GroEL/GroES-mediated denatured soluble pig heart MDH refolding by measuring MDH enzyme acti2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 05-01, Volume: 29, Issue:9
HSP60/10 chaperonin systems are inhibited by a variety of approved drugs, natural products, and known bioactive molecules.
AID1146174Agonist activity at beta-adrenergic receptor in guinea pig tracheal tissue assessed as bronchodilator activity1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 20, Issue:10
Adrenerigic agents. 7.1 Synthesis and beta-adrenergic agonist activity of several 2-pyridylethanolamines.
AID606103Agonist activity at human adrenergic beta2 receptor expressed in H292 cells assessed as intracellular cAMP accumulation after 1 hr2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-01, Volume: 21, Issue:13
Design driven HtL: The discovery and synthesis of new high efficacy β₂-agonists.
AID215614Dissociation constant against a series of agonists of membranes of the turkey erythrocyte containing mainly beta-adrenoceptors was determined.1982Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 25, Issue:12
Correlation between affinity toward adrenergic receptors and approximate electrostatic potentials of phenylethylamine derivatives. 1. Effects of the side chain.
AID1123874Inhibition of histamine-induced asthma-like syndrome in guinea pig assessed as time delay in appearance of coughing at 1.25 mg/kg, po treated 30 mins before histamine challenge (Rvb = 6.13 mins)1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 22, Issue:3
New bronchodilators. Synthesis and bronchodilating activity of some 3-(alkoxymethyl)-alpha-(N-substituted aminomethyl)-4-hydroxybenzyl alcohols.
AID218848Change in Gibb's free energy at Low affinity beta-2-adrenoceptor in the Chang living cells1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 31, Issue:6
Mapping of the beta 2-adrenoceptor on Chang liver cells. Differences between high- and low-affinity receptor states.
AID1906927Bronchodilatory activity in rabbit model assessed as inhibition of acetylcholine-induced bronchoconstriction at 3 ug/kg, iv measured after 30 mins by Konzett-Roessler methodology relative to control
AID771314Cellular uptake in human HEK293 cells assessed as human OCT2-mediated drug transport at 2.5 uM after 4 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis relative to passive uptake2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-26, Volume: 56, Issue:18
Identification of novel substrates and structure-activity relationship of cellular uptake mediated by human organic cation transporters 1 and 2.
AID1146175Agonist activity at beta-adrenergic receptor in guinea pig right atrial muscle assessed as rate of contraction of spontaneously beating atria1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 20, Issue:10
Adrenerigic agents. 7.1 Synthesis and beta-adrenergic agonist activity of several 2-pyridylethanolamines.
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID1146067Separation ratio of ED25 at beta-adrenoceptor in guinea pig atria to ED50 for beta-adrenoceptor in guinea pig trachea1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 20, Issue:8
Adrenergic agents. 6. Synthesis and potential beta-adrenergic agonist activity of some meta-substituted p-hydroxyphenylethanolamines related to salbutamol.
AID425652Total body clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID1223482Ratio of drug level in blood to plasma in iv dosed human2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Prediction of in vivo hepatic clearance and half-life of drug candidates in human using chimeric mice with humanized liver.
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID496820Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1594134Inhibition of native soluble pig heart MDH assessed as reduction in MDH enzyme activity using sodium mesoxalate as substrate and NADH by malachite green dye based spectrometric analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 05-01, Volume: 29, Issue:9
HSP60/10 chaperonin systems are inhibited by a variety of approved drugs, natural products, and known bioactive molecules.
AID444056Fraction escaping gut-wall elimination in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID426237Agonist activity at adrenergic beta2 receptor in Hartley guinea pig tracheal ring assessed as maximum bronchorelaxation activity against histamine-induced contraction at 100 uM2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 44, Issue:7
Synthesis, pharmacological and in silico evaluation of 1-(4-di-hydroxy-3,5-dioxa-4-borabicyclo[4.4.0]deca-7,9,11-trien-9-yl)-2-(tert-butylamino)ethanol, a compound designed to act as a beta2 adrenoceptor agonist.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1347049Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot screen2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347045Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot counterscreen GloSensor control cell line2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID588378qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation
AID1347050Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr2) antagonism - Pilot subtype selectivity assay2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID588349qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation of Cytotoxic Assay
AID504836Inducers of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response (ERSR) in human glioma: Validation2002The Journal of biological chemistry, Apr-19, Volume: 277, Issue:16
Sustained ER Ca2+ depletion suppresses protein synthesis and induces activation-enhanced cell death in mast cells.
AID588519A screen for compounds that inhibit viral RNA polymerase binding and polymerization activities2011Antiviral research, Sep, Volume: 91, Issue:3
High-throughput screening identification of poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitors.
AID540299A screen for compounds that inhibit the MenB enzyme of Mycobacterium tuberculosis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 20, Issue:21
Synthesis and SAR studies of 1,4-benzoxazine MenB inhibitors: novel antibacterial agents against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID504749qHTS profiling for inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum proliferation2011Science (New York, N.Y.), Aug-05, Volume: 333, Issue:6043
Chemical genomic profiling for antimalarial therapies, response signatures, and molecular targets.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1798855Beta-2 Adrenergic Receptor Binding Assay and Agonist Functionality Assay from Article 10.1021/jm801211c: \\Synthesis and pharmacological characterization of beta2-adrenergic agonist enantiomers: zilpaterol.\\2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 52, Issue:6
Synthesis and pharmacological characterization of beta2-adrenergic agonist enantiomers: zilpaterol.
AID17985803H-CGP 12177 Whole Cell Binding Assay from Article 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706048: \\The selectivity of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists at the human beta1, beta2 and beta3 adrenoceptors.\\2005British journal of pharmacology, Feb, Volume: 144, Issue:3
The selectivity of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists at the human beta1, beta2 and beta3 adrenoceptors.
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
AID1346250Human beta2-adrenoceptor (Adrenoceptors)2005British journal of pharmacology, Feb, Volume: 144, Issue:3
The selectivity of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists at the human beta1, beta2 and beta3 adrenoceptors.
AID1346250Human beta2-adrenoceptor (Adrenoceptors)1999Molecular pharmacology, Nov, Volume: 56, Issue:5
Binding pockets of the beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenergic receptors for subtype-selective agonists.
AID1159550Human Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD) Inhibitor Screening2015Nature cell biology, Nov, Volume: 17, Issue:11
6-Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase links oxidative PPP, lipogenesis and tumour growth by inhibiting LKB1-AMPK signalling.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (9,496)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19902044 (21.52)18.7374
1990's2513 (26.46)18.2507
2000's2629 (27.69)29.6817
2010's1890 (19.90)24.3611
2020's420 (4.42)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 86.88

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index86.88 (24.57)
Research Supply Index9.49 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.53 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index223.14 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.74 (0.95)

This Compound (86.88)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials3,059 (30.26%)5.53%
Reviews587 (5.81%)6.00%
Case Studies582 (5.76%)4.05%
Observational38 (0.38%)0.25%
Other5,842 (57.80%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (393)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Evaluating Bronchodilator Response in Patients With Bronchiectasis [NCT05932316]96 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-20Recruiting
Mannitol-Induced Cough Challenge in Healthy Controls and Subjects With Mild Allergic Asthma [NCT03620422]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-11Completed
Double Blind, Double Dummy, Cross-over Study to Compare the Bronchodilator Effect of CHF1535 pMDI (Fixed Combination of Beclometasone 50 µg + Formoterol 6 µg) Versus Free Combination of Beclometasone Plus Formoterol pMDI in Asthmatic Children [NCT01584492]Phase 259 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Comparison of Preoperative Inhaled Budesonide With Salbutamol on the Respiratory Adverse Effects in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy [NCT06158893]Phase 487 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-08-31Not yet recruiting
Peak Inspiratory Flow (PIF) and Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) Performance in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [NCT04606394]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-02Completed
A Phase II Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Inhaled Dose of Albuterol Sulfate Dry Powder Via the Trivair Deposition System Versus Albuterol Sulfate HFA pMDI in Patients With Intermittent or Persistent Mild Asthma [NCT01252758]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Withdrawn
Physiological Response to Salbutamol and Exercise [NCT03902106]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-28Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Nasonex vs. Placebo in Subjects With SAR and Concomitant Asthma [NCT00070707]Phase 4188 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-03Completed
Asthma and Childhood Obesity: Understanding Potential Mechanisms and Identifying Strategies to Improve Respiratory Symptoms [NCT03586544]Phase 434 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-18Terminated(stopped due to The study was halted prematurely due to COVID 19.)
Comparative Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Procaterol vs Salbutamol Given Via Metered Dose Inhaler With Spacer in the Management of Acute Asthma Attack in the Emergency Room [NCT01091337]Phase 496 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Multicentre, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind (Sponsor Open), Parallel-group, 8-week Treatment Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Intra-nasal GSK2245035 in Adults With Allergic Asthma Treated With Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS) [NCT03707678]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-21Withdrawn(stopped due to After careful review of new data on GSK2245035, GlaxoSmithKline has decided to cancel this study.)
Preliminary Assessment of the Effect of PulseHaler™ With Albuterol on Lung Deposition of Aerosol and on Pulmonary Functions in COPD Patients [NCT01187589]15 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Double- or Evaluator-blind, Active- and Placebo-controlled, Single Dose, Seven-arm, Crossover Dose-ranging Study of A006 in Adult Asthma Patients [NCT01581177]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
GOLD Stage I COPD: Is it Really a Disease ? Exercise Tolerance, Muscle Function and Response to Bronchodilation in GOLD Stage I COPD Patients [NCT01360788]53 participants (Actual)Observational2009-02-28Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Single-dose, 2-Period, Crossover Study to Assess the Efficacy of PT027 Compared With Placebo on Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Adult and Adolescent Subjects With Asthma [NCT04234464]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-15Completed
A Double-blind Placebo-controlled Crossover Study to Assess the Effects of Bronchodilation on Dyspnea, Ventilatory Responses, and Exercise Tolerance in Adults With Cystic Fibrosis [NCT03522831]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-01Active, not recruiting
"A 12-Week, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Relationship Between Use of Albuterol eMDPI, an Inhaled Short-Acting Beta Agonist Rescue Agent With an eModule, and Exacerbations in Patients (18 Years of Age or Older) With Asthma" [NCT02969408]Phase 3397 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-13Completed
An Open Label, Randomised, Parallel Group Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of the Connected Inhaler System (CIS) on Adherence to Relvar/Breo ELLIPTA Therapy, in Asthmatic Subjects With Poor Control [NCT03380429]Phase 4437 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-31Completed
A Phase IIb, Randomized (Stratified), Double-Blind (Sponsor Open), Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Finding Study of Nemiralisib (GSK2269557) Added to Standard of Care (SoC) Versus SoC Alone in Participants Diagnosed With an Acute Moderate or Seve [NCT03345407]Phase 2943 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-28Terminated(stopped due to Unfavourable benefit:risk)
A Randomized, Cumulative Dose, Open-label, 2-period Crossover, Multi-center Study to Assess the Safety, Efficacy, PK, and Extrapulmonary Pharmacodynamics (PD) of Cumulative Doses of Albuterol Sulfate Pressurized Inhalation Suspension (Hereafter Referred t [NCT03371459]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-29Completed
Cumulative Dose, 2-Way Crossover Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Albuterol Administered by the Halix™ Dry Powder Inhaler Compared With MDI in Subjects With Asthma [NCT03643874]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-30Completed
Enabling Innovative Respiratory Real World Evidence Generation: Sensor and EHR Integration Pilot Study [NCT03357341]194 participants (Actual)Observational2018-07-23Completed
A Phase III, 52-week, Open-label Study to Evaluate Long-term Safety of Fixed Dose Combination Therapy Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol Trifenatate in Japanese Patients With Asthma [NCT03184987]Phase 3111 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-22Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Active Controlled, Parallel Group Study, Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Fixed Dose Combination FF/UMEC/VI With the Fixed Dose Dual Combination of FF/VI, Administered Once-daily Via a Dry Powde [NCT02924688]Phase 32,436 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-13Completed
The Effects of Salbutamol on Mannitol Induced Cough Responses in Healthy Controls [NCT04565847]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-30Completed
Effectiveness of Salbutamol Administration by Nebulizer Versus Metered Dose Inhaler With Spacer in Acute Asthma in Children in Suez Canal University Hospital Emergency Department: A Randomized Control Trial [NCT03816267]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-15Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, 8-Week Cross-Over Study to Compare Umeclidinium/Vilanterol With Tiotropium/Olodaterol Once-Daily in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [NCT02799784]Phase 4236 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-14Completed
The Effects of Inhaled Beta-2-Agonists and Air Pollution on Lung Function and Athletic Capacity [NCT02252302]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Salbutamol: Tolerance to Bronchoprotection vs. Methacholine: Time Course of Onset [NCT01338311]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Reducing Diagnostic Error to Improve Patient Safety in COPD and Asthma (REDEFINE Study) [NCT03137303]Phase 3402 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-01Completed
[NCT01076322]Phase 317 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
[NCT01375361]Phase 2/Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Low enrollment.)
Effect of Adding Nebulized Salbutamol to Intravenous Atropine and Oxygen During Resuscitation of OP Pesticide Poisoned Patients [NCT02160548]Phase 375 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
Evaluation of Electrical Impedance Tomography for the Diagnosis of Chronic Rejection in Lung Transplants Recipients [NCT02863835]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
Open Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Combivent® Aerosol (120 mcg Salbutamol Sulfate Plus 20 mcg Ipratropium Bromide) + Spacer, 12 to 24 Puffs, in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Asthma Crisis [NCT02182700]Phase 347 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-07-31Terminated
A Randomised, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Within-patient Trial Comparing the Effect of Single Doses of Nebulised Ipratropium 500µg, Salbutamol Sulphate 3mg, Salbutamol 6mg and the Combination Therapy Salbutamol Sulphate 3 mg Plus Ipratropium 500µg on [NCT02182856]Phase 433 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-02-28Completed
Beta-agonist Efficacy and Tolerability as Adjuvant Therapy in Myasthenia Gravis [NCT03914638]Phase 2/Phase 330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-01Recruiting
Efficacy of Albuterol in the Treatment of Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes [NCT01203592]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Study of Drug Exposure in Systemic Circulation of Primatene Mist (0.25mg) by Oral Inhalation, Versus Epinephrine Injection (0.30mg) by Intramuscular Injection and ProAir (0.18mg) by Oral Inhalation in Healthy Individuals: A Randomized, Safety Evaluator-bl [NCT04207840]Phase 428 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-09Completed
A Phase IV, 12-week, Randomised, Double-blind, Triple Dummy Study to Compare Single Inhaler Triple Therapy, Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) With Multiple Inhaler Therapy (Budesonide/Formoterol Plus Tiotropium) Based on Lung Functi [NCT03478696]Phase 4732 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-25Completed
Randomized Trial Assessing the Effectiveness of Beclomethasone and Combination Beclomethasone and Salbutamol as Compared With Placebo in Preschool Aged Children With Wheeze [NCT02319564]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Study population too narrow - unable to recruit any patients.)
A Comparison of Ipratropium Bromide/Salbutamol (40 mcg / 200 mcg, One Inhalation) Delivered by the Respimat ® Inhaler to COMBIVENT Inhalation Aerosol (Two Inhalations), Ipratropium Bromide Respimat ® and Placebo of Each Formulation in a 12-week, Double-bl [NCT02177253]Phase 31,118 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
Combivent vs. Salbutamol in Patients With Metacholine Induced Bronchospasm [NCT02182713]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-05-31Completed
Lung Anatomic, Physiologic, and Inflammatory Changes With Chronic Exposure to Secondhand Tobacco Smoke [NCT02797275]Phase 4107 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-06Active, not recruiting
A 2-Period, Crossover Study to Assess the Impact of Nebulizer With Filtered Mouthpiece vs MDI With Spacer on Viral Load in Rooms of Subjects With Mild to Moderate COVID-19 [NCT04681079]14 participants (Actual)Observational2021-05-04Completed
Efficacy of Intermittent Tiotropium in Early Childhood Wheezing [NCT03199976]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-20Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Long-Term Safety of Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol Fumarate (MF/F, MK-0887A [SCH418131]), Compared With Mometasone Furoate (MF, MK-0887 [SCH032088]), in Chi [NCT02741271]Phase 3181 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-11Completed
Ventilation-drive Coupling to Evaluate The Efficacy of Inhaled Bronchodilators in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [NCT02296047]22 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
Efficacy of a Loading Dose of IV Salbutamol in Children Admitted to a PICU for Severe Acute Asthma or Severe Acute Wheeze [NCT03493503]Phase 458 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-05Completed
A Phase IIb, 24 Week, Randomized, Double-blind, 3 Arm Parallel Group Study, Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Two Doses of Umeclidinium Bromide Administered Once-daily Via a Dry Powder Inhaler, Versus Placebo, in Participants With Asthma [NCT03012061]Phase 2425 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-25Completed
Comparing Rapid Bronchodilatory Effect of Formoterol and Salbutamol in Children Between 5-15 Years With Mild to Moderate Acute Exacerbation of Asthma- A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00900874]Phase 478 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-01-31Recruiting
Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose Exploration, Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TQC3721 Suspension for Inhalation in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. [NCT05987371]Phase 272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-23Recruiting
Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Insulin Resistance in Skeletal Muscle [NCT04558190]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-02Completed
Double-blind, Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Ipratropium Bromide Associated With High Dose Salbutamol by Repeated Nebulisation Versus Repeat Nebulisation of Salbutamol Alone, for 120 Minutes, in Acute Asthmatic Attacks in Young Children [NCT02235428]Phase 43 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-09-30Terminated
Bronchodilator Effects of Nebulized Versus Inhaled Albuterol in Subjects With Lymphangioleiomyomatosis [NCT01799538]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-06-10Recruiting
A Single-Dose Efficacy Comparison of Albuterol Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) Breath-operated Inhaler (BOI) (Volare Easi-Breathe™) and Albuterol HFA Meter Dose Inhaler (MDI) (Volare™) in Adolescents and Adults With Exercise-Induced Bronchospasm [NCT00085774]Phase 324 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
In Vivo Efficacy of Salbutamol (Sandoz) Versus Salbutamol Ventolin (GSK) in Children With Asthma [NCT05884970]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-30Recruiting
Comparison of Single-dose Efficacy of Albuterol-HFA-BOI and Albuterol-HFA-MDI in Asthmatics With Poor Inhaler Coordinating Ability [NCT00054964]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
A Study of the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Responses in Healthy and Altered Human Cardiovascular Systems [NCT03098680]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-24Terminated(stopped due to Unable to recruit in time before end of PhD studentship)
Effectiveness of Routine Nebulization of Mucolytics and Bronchodilators in Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Patients' [NCT02159196]950 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Evaluation on the Efficacy of Bronchodilator Nebulization Via High Flow Nasal Cannula [NCT03091504]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-04Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized, Cross-Over Study to Evaluate the Dose Response of SYN006 HFA MDI in Asthma Patients [NCT02162784]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Efficacy of Nebulized Heparin and Salbutamol in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Exacerbation Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03333395]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-01Completed
Acute Effect of Salbutamol on Heart Rate and Blood Pressure During Exercise in Patients With Moderate or Severe Asthma and Healthy Subjects: Randomized, Double-blind, and Crossover Study [NCT03044938]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-06Completed
Salbutamol Reversal of Methacholine Induced Bronchoconstriction: Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler [NCT05977699]Phase 420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-15Not yet recruiting
A Single Dose Two-way Cross-over Study in Healthy Participants to Compare the Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Salbutamol Administered Via Metered Dose Inhalers Containing Propellants HFA-152a and HFA-134a [NCT05791565]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-04-03Completed
A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Inhaled Salbutamol vs Placebo for the Treatment of Acute Abdominal Pain From Food-induced IgE-mediated Reactions [NCT05653024]Phase 3498 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-01Recruiting
Modifying Genes in Cystic Fibrosis: The Beta-2 Adrenergic Receptors and Epithelial Na+ Channels [NCT01880723]32 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
A Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate the Trough Bronchoprotection Conferred by Chronic Dosing With Levosalbutamol and Racemic Salbutamol in Persistent Asthmatics [NCT00831376]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Effects of Inhaled Fluticasone on Sputum Neutrophils After Low-dose Inhaled Endotoxin Challenge in Healthy Subjects [NCT00869596]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Single-Dose, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Four-Period, Four-Sequence, Four-Treatment, Placebo and Active Controlled, Comparative, Multiple-Center, Crossover-Design, Bronchoprovocation Study to Evaluate the Pharmacodynamic Equivalence of Albut [NCT03549897]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-16Recruiting
Randomized, Parallel-group Trial to Evaluate Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of Nebulized Long-Acting Bronchodilators (Formoterol and Revefenacin) vs. Short-Acting Bronchodilators (Albuterol and Ipratropium) in Hospitalized Patients With AECOPD [NCT04655170]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-09Recruiting
The Development of Novel Clinical Tests to Diagnose and Monitor Asthma in Preschool Children [NCT02743663]121 participants (Actual)Observational2014-06-30Completed
A Long-term, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Parallel-group, Phase III Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of PT027 Compared to PT007 Administered as Needed in Response to Symptoms in Symptomatic Adults and Children 4 Years of Age or Older Wit [NCT03769090]Phase 33,132 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-13Completed
A Randomized, Methodology Study to Investigate the Use of 3He-MRI Lung Ventilation and Proton MRI Perfusion Imaging to Detect Changes in Ventilation Perfusion Relationships in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients; a Proof of Concept Study [NCT02207452]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-05Completed
A Randomized, Double- or Evaluator-blinded, Active- and Placebo-controlled, Cumulative-dose, Dose-escalating, Three-arm, Cross-over Study, in 24 Asthma Patients [NCT01189396]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
Phase II Study Randomized, Double- or Evaluator-blind, Active- and Placebo-controlled, Single Dose, Seven-arm, Cross-over and Dose-ranging Study of A006 DPI, Albuterol Inhalation Powder, in Adult Asthma Patients [NCT01174732]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
Video Assisted Study of Salbutamol Response in Viral Wheezing [NCT06093152]50 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-10-23Not yet recruiting
Cardiovascular Consequences of Prolonged Inhaled Short-acting Beta-agonist Use in Healthy Participants [NCT06027606]Phase 190 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-01Recruiting
Comparison of 3% Normal Saline Nebulization Versus Steroid Nebulization in the Treatment of Bronchiolitis [NCT06139029]Early Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-11-15Completed
"COPDGene Ancillary Proposal: Symbicort Intervention in Airway Predominant" [NCT01253473]Phase 446 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
A Prospective Study on the Use of Hypertonic Saline Inhalation in Acute Bronchiolitis in Children [NCT03880903]Phase 475 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-20Not yet recruiting
A Phase IV, 12-week, Randomised, Double-blind, Triple Dummy Study to Compare Single Inhaler Triple Therapy, Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) With Multiple Inhaler Therapy (Budesonide/Formoterol Plus Tiotropium) Based on Lung Functi [NCT03478683]Phase 4729 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-25Completed
A Phase IV, 12 Week, Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy Study to Compare Single Inhaler Triple Therapy, Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI), With Tiotropium Monotherapy Based on Lung Function and Symptoms in Participants With Chro [NCT03474081]Phase 4800 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-29Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Single Dose, Placebo-controlled, 5-Period, 5-Treatment, Crossover, Multi-center, Dose-ranging Study to Compare PT007 to Placebo MDI and Open-Label Proventil® HFA in Adult and Adolescent Subjects With Mild to Moderate Asthma (AN [NCT03364608]Phase 286 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-15Completed
A Multi-centre, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Anti-IgE Monoclonal Antibody to Treat Allergic Asthma Patients Not Adequately Controlled Despite Med/High ICS/LABA. [NCT03468790]Phase 3393 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-09Completed
High-flow Nasal Cannula Nebulization of Beta 2 Adrenergic Agonist During Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [NCT03449056]Phase 325 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-11Recruiting
"CONNected Electronic Inhalers Asthma Control Trial 2 (CONNECT 2), a 24-Week Treatment, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel Group Comparison, Feasibility Study of Standard of Care Treatment Versus the eMDPI Digital System, to Optimize Outcomes i [NCT04677959]Phase 4427 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-16Completed
"A 12-Week, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Relationship Between Use of Albuterol eMDPI, an Inhaled Short-Acting Beta Agonist Rescue Agent With an eModule, and Exacerbations in Patients (40 Years of Age or Older) With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseas [NCT03256695]Phase 3405 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-28Completed
Albuterol and Immune Cell Composition [NCT03889379]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-20Withdrawn(stopped due to Team decided not to initiate study.)
A Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Yong Chong Cao Capsule on Outcomes in Patients With Mild to Severe COPD [NCT03745261]Phase 3240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-20Recruiting
A 12-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Parallel Group, Phase III Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of PT027 Compared to PT008 and PT007 Administered QID in Adults and Children 4 Years of Age or Older With Asthma [NCT03847896]Phase 31,001 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-20Completed
A Prospective, Open Label, Assessment of [an Albuterol] Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) Metered Dose Inhaler MDI Integrated Dose Counter [NCT01302587]306 participants (Actual)Observational2011-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Single-Dose, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Four-Period, Four-Sequence, Four-Treatment, Placebo and Active Controlled, Comparative, Multiple-Center, Crossover-Design, Bronchoprovocation Study to Evaluate the Pharmacodynamic Equivalence of Albut [NCT03528577]Phase 3128 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-22Completed
Retrospective, Real-life Observational Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Mixed Maintenance and Reliever Inhaler Types in Patients in the Management of Asthma in a Representative UK Primary Care Population [NCT01313585]815,377 participants (Actual)Observational1991-01-31Completed
A Phase 1, Randomized, Open-label, Single-dose, 3-way Cross-over Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of Budesonide and Albuterol Delivered by PT027 Compared With PT007 and PT008 Administered Separately (LOGAN). [NCT03772223]Phase 191 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-21Completed
Randomized, Parallel Group, Phase III, Non-inferiority Study Comparing Ipratropium / Levosalbutamol Fixed Dose Combination in pMDI Form and Ipratropium and Salbutamol Free Dose Combination in pMDI Form in Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD [NCT06040424]Phase 374 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-28Active, not recruiting
5 Versus 10 Units of Insulin in Hyperkalemia Management: Multi-center, Prospective, Double-blind, Non-inferiority, Randomized Control Trial. [NCT06036823]Phase 4336 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-01Recruiting
Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of SAR231893/REGN668 Administered Subcutaneously Once Weekly for 12 Weeks in Patients With Persistent Moderate to Severe Eosinophilic Asthm [NCT01312961]Phase 2104 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
A Phase I, Single Center, Placebo-Controlled, Blinded Pilot Study of Ipratropium Bromide in Children Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit With Status Asthmaticus [NCT02872597]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-05Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label Study to Investigate the Effect of Albuterol (Salbutamol) and Fluticasone on the Pharmacokinetics of Inhaled Technosphere® Insulin Inhalation Powder in Healthy Subjects [NCT00674050]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Multi-Center 52-Week Study to Assess the Safety of an Albuterol Dry-powder Inhaler in Subjects With Asthma [NCT01218009]Phase 3331 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Change to study required.)
Changes in the Lung Clearance Index as Measured by Multiple-breath Washout, in Pediatric Patients With Asthma After Challenge With Inhaled Steroids and Short-acting Bronchodilator [NCT02678949]105 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-03-31Not yet recruiting
Efficacy of Nebulized Magnesium Sulfate as an Adjunct to Standard Therapy in Asthma Exacerbation. A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02584738]Phase 4152 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Recruiting
A Dose Response Study of Levalbuterol and Racemic Albuterol HFA MDI in Pediatric Subjects With Asthma [NCT00685347]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
A Dose Response and PharmacoDynamic Study of Levalbuterol and Racemic Albuterol HFA MDI in Subjects Twelve Years of Age and Older With Asthma [NCT00685425]Phase 362 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
Utilizing Advances in Digital Inhaler Technology to Understand Heterogeneous Treatment Responses to Biologics in Severe Asthma [NCT04997304]Phase 4101 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-07-09Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Patients With Persistent Asthma [NCT02414854]Phase 31,902 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-27Completed
Assessing the Effectiveness of Integrative Treatment That Combines Interior and Exterior Treatment Plans in Pediatric Pneumonia: a Program by PRC National Clinical Research Base of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Major Diseases [NCT02069665]451 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
The Effect of Adding Nebulized Epinephrine in Asthma Exacerbation Management in Pediatric Age Group Compared to Standard of Care: Superiority Trial [NCT05667727]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-15Recruiting
A First in Human, Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled, Three-part Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Single and Multiple Ascending Doses (SAD & MAD) of Inhaled ETD002 in Healthy Male and Female Subjects [NCT04488705]Phase 180 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-13Completed
Albuterol and Dynamic Hyperinflation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [NCT02108743]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of funding)
A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, 52-week Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NVA237 in Patients With Poorly Controlled Asthma [NCT02127697]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Withdrawn
Testing Potential Synergistic Effects of Albuterol and Caffeine on Metabolic Rate. [NCT02135965]Early Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Phase II, Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Seven Way Crossover Study to Assess the Effect of Single Doses of RPL554 Compared to Salbutamol and Placebo Administered by Nebuliser on Lung Function of Patients With Chronic Asthma [NCT02427165]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Propionate/Albuterol Sulfate Fixed-Dose Combination on Severe Asthma Exacerbations in Patients With Asthma [NCT06052267]Phase 32,196 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-30Recruiting
A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate Safety, Toxicity, and Potential Mechanisms of Interferon Gamma-primed Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) for Moderate-to-severe Persistent Asthma [NCT05035862]Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-16Recruiting
201546, A Repeat-dose Study of Batefenterol/FF (GSK961081/GW685698) Compared With Placebo in the Treatment of COPD [NCT02573870]Phase 263 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-01Completed
Improving Inhaler Treatment and Small Airways Assessment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [NCT01721291]Phase 465 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-01Completed
Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Chronic-dose Safety and Efficacy of Albuterol-HFA-MDI Relative to Placebo in Pediatric Asthmatics [NCT00577655]Phase 3103 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Albuterol Integrated Adherence Monitoring in Children With Asthma [NCT04896645]21 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-01Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Triple-dummy, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter, 5-period, Single-dose Complete Block Crossover Study to Determine the Onset of Action of Indacaterol (150 and 300 μg) in Patients With Moderate to Severe COPD Using Salb [NCT00669617]Phase 389 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Neural Respiratory Drive of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [NCT05786950]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-01Recruiting
Bronchodilator's Effects on Exertional Dyspnoea in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [NCT02782052]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor's decision)
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Grass (Phleum Pratense) Sublingual Tablet (SCH 697243) in Adult Subjects With a History of Grass Pollen Induced Rhinoconjunctivitis Wit [NCT00562159]Phase 3439 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Single-Dose Fasting Bioequivalence Study of Albuterol Sulfate Extended-Release Tablets (8 mg; Mylan) and VoSpire® ER Tablets (8 mg; Pliva) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00649779]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Determine the Efficacy of Levalbuterol Versus Racemic Albuterol in the Treatment of Acute Asthma [NCT00667407]Phase 3627 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-11-30Completed
Pharmacoeconomic Outcomes of Levalbuterol and Racemic Albuterol in Inpatients Requiring Nebulization (POLARIS) [NCT00667797]Phase 4486 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Lung Volume and Symptom Scores Following Bronchodilator Therapy Administration by Vibrating Mesh and Standard Jet Nebulisers: A Pilot Comparison Study [NCT02686086]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Completed
A Randomized, Multicenter, Placebo and Active-Controlled, Single-Dose, 4-Period, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Bronchodilating Effect of SYMBICORT pMDI Versus Advair Diskus and Ventolin HFA. [NCT00646620]Phase 348 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
Bronchodilator Test in Mechanical Ventilated Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients, a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02218398]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-05-31Recruiting
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Nebulization Bronchodilators Under High Nasal Flow Humidified Compared to a Usual Method [NCT02812979]25 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Completed
To Compare the Bronchoprotective Effects of the Test and Reference Metered Dose Inhalers (MDIs) Containing Albuterol Sulfate Using Methacholine Bronchoprovocation Challenge Testing in Stable Mild Asthma Patients. [NCT02624505]Phase 3110 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
The Effectiveness of Single Dose Ultibro Breezhaler (Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium) by Sd-DPI Versus Ipratropium/Salbutamol by Nebulizer in Improving FEV1 and Dyspnea During Stable State of COPD [NCT02576626]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group Trial Comparing 12 Weeks Treatment With Tiotropium 18 mcg Daily to Combivent MDI 2 Actuations Qid in COPD Patients Previously Prescribed Combivent MDI [NCT00359788]Phase 4349 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
COMPIS- Congenital Myopathy Intervention Study. An Open-label, Cross Over, Randomised, Controlled Study Using Oral Salbutamol [NCT05099107]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-25Enrolling by invitation
A Comparative Study of Inhaled Ciclesonide Versus Placebo in Children With Asthma [NCT00384189]Phase 31,080 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A Hazardous Combination of Cigarette Smoking and Bronchodilation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [NCT00981851]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A Cumulative Dose Tolerability Study of Levalbuterol HFA and Racemic Albuterol HFA in Pediatric Subjects With Asthma [NCT00684866]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Crossover Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacodynamics of PUL-042 Inhalation Solution in Healthy Subjects and the Effect of Pretreatment With Cromolyn Sodium or Albuterol Sulfate [NCT02566252]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
A Cumulative Dose Tolerability Study of Levalbuterol HFA and Racemic Albuterol HFA in Subjects Twelve Years of Age and Older With Asthma [NCT00685022]Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Hypertonic Vrs. Normal Saline as Diluent of Salbutamol to Reduce Respiratory Distress in Outpatients With the Clinical Diagnosis of Bronchiolitis During the RSV Epidemic. [NCT00696540]Phase 274 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-06-30Recruiting
A Safety, Efficacy, and Tolerability Study of Daily Dosing With Levalbuterol Tartrate HFA MDI and Placebo in Subjects Aged Birth to <48 Months With Asthma [NCT00809757]Phase 3197 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Double Blind, Multinational, Multicentre, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Design Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Nebulised Beclometahsone Dipropionate (400 μg b.i.d.) Plus as Needed Salbutamol Versus as Needed Salbutamol or as Needed Salbutamol/Bec [NCT00497523]Phase 3283 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Open, Randomized, Two-Way Crossover, Pilot Study to Assess the Effect of Salbutamol in Comparison With Ipratropium Bromide on Central and Peripheral Airway Dimensions in COPD Patients [NCT00911651]Phase 46 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
The Effect of High Dose Salbutamol on Dynamic and Isometric Muscle Power and Recovery in Well-trained Males [NCT01415596]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Active, not recruiting
Inhaled Hypertonic Saline to Reduce Hospital Admissions in Infants With Viral Bronchiolitis (HS in ER Study) [NCT00677729]Phase 281 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Comparison of Hospital Admission Rates and Plasma(s)-Albuterol Levels in Children Treated With Racemic Albuterol Versus Levalbuterol for Acute Asthma Exacerbations: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial [NCT00585039]Phase 4101 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Cumulative Dose Tolerability Study of Levalbuterol HFA and Racemic Albuterol HFA in Subjects Twelve Years of Age and Older With Asthma [NCT00684827]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
A Multicenter Randomized Study Starting With a 4 Week 2 Way Crossover Double Blind Treatment Phase Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Combivent CFC MDI to Albuterol HFA MDI Followed by a 4 Week Open Label Combivent Respimat Treatment Phase When All Stud [NCT00818454]Phase 2226 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Effect of Bronchodilators on Respiratory Mechanics in COPD Patients With Poor Reversibility [NCT00783250]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Problems with data collection)
A Cumulative Dose Safety and Tolerability Crossover Study of Arformoterol Tartrate Inhalation Solution and Levalbuterol Hydrochloride Inhalation Solution in Pediatric Subjects (Aged 2 to 11 Years of Age) With Asthma [NCT00583947]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Single-Dose Fasting Bioequivalence Study of Nisoldipine Extended-Release Tablets(40 mg; Mylan) and Sular® Extended Release Tablets (40 mg; First Horizon) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00730197]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Role of 11 Weeks of Beta2-adrenergic Signaling and Resistance Training for Cardiac and Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy in Men [NCT02551276]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
[NCT02592122]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-10-31Recruiting
A 12-week Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Albuterol Spiromax® Versus Placebo in Subjects 12 Years and Older With Persistent Asthma [NCT01424813]Phase 3158 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Multicenter, Placebo and Active-controlled, Single-dose, 4-period, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Bronchodilating Effect of SYMBICORT pMDI Versus Advair Diskus and Ventolin HFA. [NCT00646009]Phase 348 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
Single-Dose Fed Bioequivalence Study of Albuterol Sulfate Extended-Release Tablets (8 mg; Mylan) and VoSpire® ER Tablets (8 mg; Pliva) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00649987]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Single and Multiple Ascending Doses of SAR443765 in Healthy Adult Participants and of a Single Dose of SAR443765 in Participants With Mild-t [NCT05366764]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-06-08Completed
Dose Escalation Clinical Trial of High-dose Oral Montelukast to Inform Future RCT in Children With Acute Asthma Exacerbations [NCT05819541]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-01Recruiting
Evaluation of Aerosolized Drugs Deposition Delivered Through a Mechanical Ventilator [NCT02818270]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Completed
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension for Acute Asthma in Children [NCT00393367]Phase 4179 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
A Phase III, 4-week, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Compare 'Closed' Triple Therapy (FF/UMEC/VI), 'Open' Triple Therapy (FF/VI + UMEC) and Dual Therapy (FF/VI) in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [NCT02731846]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to It has been determined on June 10th that the 205165 study will not progress. This decision has been made prior to study start, no patients were screened.)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, 6-Week Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Beclomethasone Dipropionate Delivered Via Breath-Actuated Inhaler (BAI) at 320 or 640 mcg/Day in Adolescent and Adult Patients 12 Ye [NCT02513160]Phase 3713 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Arg/Arg Genotype and Long Acting Beta Agonists in Asthma. Improved Quality of Care for Patients With Asthma. [NCT00521222]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Use of Buventol Easyhaler and Bufomix Easyhaler as Relievers in Methacholine Challenge Testing and Inspiratory Flow Profiles During Induced Bronchoconstriction in Adult Subjects [NCT05084222]Phase 4180 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-11-11Completed
Role of Airway Hyperresponsiveness on Performance in Elite Swimmers: Efficiency of a Bronchodilator to Prevent an Exercise-induced Bronchoconstriction [NCT00876135]57 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy Study of Levalbuterol and Racemic Albuterol in Pediatric Subjects Birth to 48 Months Old With Reactive Airways Disease in an Acute Setting [NCT00685126]Phase 3117 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-02-28Completed
Diagnostic Yield of Induced Sputum for Rapid Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis [NCT00608790]600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-02-29Recruiting
A Phase II, Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Six Way Crossover Study to Assess the Bronchodilator Effect of RPL554 Administered on Top of Salbutamol and Ipratropium in Patients With COPD. [NCT02542254]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Beta2-mimetic and Central Nervous System: Effects of Salbutamol on Cortical Excitability and Cerebral Activation [NCT02925130]15 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Completed
Assessment of Ventilation-perfusion Abnormalities in Patients With Smoking-related Airways Disease in Stable Condition and the Effect of Bronchodilator Therapy [NCT00180843]2 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Terminated(stopped due to lack of resources research fellow left)
"Interventional Study: Hypertonic Saline as Add on Treatment to the Usual Therapy for Preschool Children With Acute Asthmatic Attack Presenting to the ER: A Double Blind Control Study" [NCT01073527]41 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate the Peak Bronchoprotection Conferred by Single and Chronic Dosing With Levosalbutamol and Racemic Salbutamol in Persistent Asthmatics. [NCT00830882]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of funding)
Chronic-Dose Safety and Efficacy Study of Albuterol-HFA-BAI (PROAIR™ HFA (Albuterol Sulfate) Breath Actuated Inhalation Aerosol) in Pediatric Asthmatics [NCT00308685]Phase 395 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-10Completed
Asthma Control Assessment Via ACT and DRC in Asthmatics Treated With Seretide (50/250) Over 12 Weeks [NCT00363480]Phase 4221 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-17Completed
Assessment of Bronchodilator Responsiveness in Healthy Young Adults Using Forced Oscillations [NCT01067534]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Patient Acceptability of Ipratropium Bromide/Albuteroll Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler in Adults With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [NCT01019694]Phase 3470 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Evaluation of 3D Magnetic Resonance Spirometry : Comparison to Spirometry in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Asthma and COPD [NCT05724745]75 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-28Not yet recruiting
The Pharmacogenetic Effects of Inhaled Salbutamol on Breathing Mechanics and Cycling Performance [NCT01903785]Phase 494 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Lung Macrophage Populations and Functions in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)-Susceptible Smokers [NCT04722835]40 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-03-01Recruiting
Inhaled Salbutamol in Elective Caesarean Section [NCT01978418]Phase 462 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-11-30Recruiting
An Open-label, Randomised, Cross-over, Two Cohort, Single Dose Study in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate the Unit Dose Dry Powder Inhaler (UD-DPI) for the Delivery of Salbutamol and to Compare the Pharmacokinetic Profile With the MDI and Diskus Presentation [NCT01984086]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-21Completed
A Stepwise, Rising Dose Study of Male Subjects With Mild Intermittent Asthma to Assess the Topical Safety and Tolerability of Albuterol Sulfate Acu-30™ DPI Compared With Placebo Acu-30™ DPI [NCT00565591]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Bronchodilators for Wheeze in Young Children Presenting to Primary Care: a Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Multicentre, Parallel Group Trial [NCT04584034]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Premature ending of the study due to impossibility of obtaining a suitable placebo-inhaler)
Response to Bronchodilation With Tiotropium Plus Salbutamol Correlates With Radiologic Morphology of the Lung in COPD of the Emphysematous Phenotype [NCT02008162]60 participants (Anticipated)Observational2009-11-30Recruiting
A Randomised, Open-Label, Four Period, Crossover Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure of Fluticasone Propionate From FLIXOTIDE™ 250 HFA pMDI and of Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol From SERETIDE™ 250/25 HFA pMDI When Given With the VENTOLIN Mini-Spa [NCT02045953]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-29Completed
A Study to Determine the Reliability of a Top Mount Actuation Indicator When Used With Levalbuterol Tartrate HFA MDI in Adult and Pediatric Subjects With Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [NCT00583986]Phase 3150 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Cost Effectiveness Analysis of a Randomized Control Trial of q3h vs. q4h Albuterol as Discharge Criteria From the Hospital for Pediatric Asthma Exacerbations [NCT04542005]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding not obtained)
Influence of Salbutamol on Emotional and Cognitive Functions in Healthy Subjects [NCT01957293]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Controlled Randomized Double-blind Study Comparing Salbutamol and Placebo Via Aerosol in Chronic Obstructive Respiratory Insufficiency in Exacerbartion Treated With Noninvasive Ventilation [NCT01958814]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Elderly Patients Affected by Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure:A Randomized Control Study vs Standard Medical Therapy A Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00600639]Phase 482 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Terminated
A 12-week Study to Evaluate the 24-hour Pulmonary Function Profile of Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol (FF/VI) Inhalation Powder 100/25 mcg Once Daily Compared With Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Inhalation Powder 250/50 mcg Twice Daily in Subjects With [NCT01323621]Phase 3512 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-18Completed
Double-blind, Crossover, Placebo-controlled Evaluation of the Effect of Levalbuterol (R-albuterol) on Allergen Induced Airway Inflammation In Subjects With Atopic Asthma [NCT00320034]Phase 215 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Nebulized Salbutamol Facilitate Management of Hyperkalemia Postreperfusion During Liver Transplantation: a Single-center, Randomized, Positive-controlled Clinical Study [NCT05589441]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-28Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Severe Asthma With Eosinophilic Inflammation [NCT03562195]Phase 3300 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-29Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics After Administration of Technosphere® Insulin Inhalation Powder Alone and With Salbutamol (Albuterol) and/or After Methacholine Challenge Testing in Subjects With Asthma Versus [NCT00673621]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Prospective Trial of Effect of Nebulized Bronchodilators on Heart Rate and Arrhythmias in Critically Ill Adult Patients [NCT01151579]Phase 489 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A 64-week Treatment, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of QVA149 (110/50 μg o.d.) vs NVA237 (50 μg o.d.) and Open-label Tiotropium (18 μg o.d.) on COPD Exacerbations in Patients With Sev [NCT01120691]Phase 32,224 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
A Study to Investigate the Relative Efficacy of Terbutaline Turbuhaler® 0.4 mg and Salbutamol Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler (pMDI) 200 μg - a Single Blind, Single Dose, Randomized, Crossover, Phase III Study in Japanese Adult Asthma Patients [NCT01096017]Phase 324 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Measurements of Change of Respiratory Admittance Induced by Salbutamol for Pediatric Asthma Diagnosis [NCT02877537]Phase 4177 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Individual beta2-adrenergic Performance Response to Salbutamol [NCT04615611]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-07Not yet recruiting
The Effect of β2 Genetic Polymorphisms on the Brochodilatation Effect of Albuterol ex-Vivo [NCT00162422]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-08-31Recruiting
A Single Dose, Randomized, Double-blind Crossover Comparison of Combivent CFC MDI and Albuterol HFA MDI in Patients With Moderate to Severe Persistent Asthma and Persistent Symptoms Despite Treatment With Inhaled Corticosteroids [NCT00096616]Phase 2113 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
48-week,Multinational,Randomized,Double-blind,2-parallel Groups,Comparing the Efficacy of Foster for Maintenance and Reliever Versus Fixed-dose Foster for Maintenance Plus Salbutamol as Reliever in Asthmatics >=18 Years of Age [NCT00861926]Phase 32,079 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Effect of Salbutamol on Walking Capacity in Ambulatory ALS Patients [NCT05860244]Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-30Not yet recruiting
[NCT01447069]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-10-31Not yet recruiting
Response of Asthmatic Children's Lung Function to Nebulized Magnesium Sulfate After Acetylcholine Provocation Test: a Clinical Trail [NCT01856959]330 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
A Clinical Investigation of the Safety and Efficacy of Albuterol on Motor Function in Individuals With Late-onset Pompe Disease, Whether or Not Receiving Enzyme Replacement Therapy [NCT01859624]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
The Effect of Inhaled Salbutamol on Sprint Performance During and After Submaximal Endurance Exercise in Non-asthmatic Athletes [NCT04402658]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-08-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Problem with acquiring study medication and lack of resources.)
Characterization of Placebo Responses in Stable Asthma [NCT01143688]39 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
A Safety and Tolerability Study of Levalbuterol Tartrate HFA Inhalation Aerosol Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) in Pediatric Subjects Birth to ≤ 48 Months of Age With Reactive Airways Disease in an Acute Setting [NCT02150499]Phase 318 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Terminated
A Randomised Double-blind (Sponsor Open), Placebo Controlled, Single Ascending Dose, First Time in Human Study in Participants With Mild to Moderate Asthma to Assess Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of GSK3511294 [NCT03287310]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-17Completed
Effect of Different Doses of Budesonide on Markers of Bone Metabolism in Children With Asthma - Randomized, Controlled Trial. [NCT00487773]Phase 496 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Does Inhaled Salbutamol Prevent Lung Edema After Thoracic Surgery? A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT00498251]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
To Compare the Bronchoprotective Effects of the Test and Reference Metered Dose Inhalers (MDIs) Containing Albuterol Sulfate Using Methacholine Bronchoprovocation Challenge Testing in Stable Mild Asthma Patients. [NCT06154304]Phase 3120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-11Not yet recruiting
Multicentre, Multinational, Randomised, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Active Drug Controlled, Parallel Group Study Design Clinical Trial of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Beclomethasone Dipropionate 250 mcg Plus Salbutamol 100 mcg in HFA pMDI Fixed Combin [NCT00528723]Phase 3180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Parallel Group, Phase III, Non-inferiority Study Comparing Ipratropium / Levosalbutamol Fixed Dose Combination and Ipratropium and Levosalbutamol Free Dose Combination Nebuliser Solutions in Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD [NCT05890638]Phase 374 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-25Recruiting
A Study to Optimise the Propranolol Block Model for Assessment of the Pharmacological Activity of Bronchodilators in Healthy Volunteers. [NCT00549120]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-15Completed
The Cardiopulmonary Effect of Inhaled Beta-2-agonists on Adult Ventrucular Septal Defect Patients With Persistant or Surgically Corrected Conditions - The VENTI Trial [NCT02914652]Phase 496 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-15Completed
A Phase 4, Open-label, Single Arm, 24-week, Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Mepolizumab 100 mg SC Administered Every 4 Weeks in Indian Participants Aged ≥18 Years With Severe Eosinophilic asthMa (PRISM) [NCT04276233]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-29Recruiting
A Randomized, Single-dose, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo and Active Controlled, Crossover Design Study Using Bronchoprovocation to Evaluate the Pharmacodynamic Equivalence of the Test and Reference Metered Dose Inhalers (MDIs) Containing Albuterol S [NCT04912596]148 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-15Recruiting
Comparison of Benzalkonium Chloride Containing Albuterol Versus Preservative Free Albuterol for the Treatment of Status Asthmaticus [NCT02966184]Phase 48 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-10Terminated(stopped due to Study Drug Backorder)
A Multi-enter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Four-way Incomplete Block Crossover Study to Examine Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Single and Repeat Administration of Three Inhaled Doses (10, 15, and [NCT00358488]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Acoustic Assessment of Nebulized Epinephrine Versus Albuterol for RSV Bronchiolitis- a Double Blind Study [NCT00361452]Phase 430 participants Interventional2000-12-31Terminated
The Effects of Positive Airway Pressure on the Mucolytic Effects of NAC [NCT06152653]Phase 420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-21Recruiting
An Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability Study of Daily Dosing With Levalbuterol, Racemic Albuterol, and Placebo in Pediatric Subjects With Asthma [NCT00073814]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
An Efficacy Study of Single-Dose Levalbuterol Tartrate HFA MDI Versus Placebo in Prevention of EIB in Subjects 18 Years of Age and Older With EIB [NCT00268723]Phase 315 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
Measurement of Exertional Dyspnea in the Primary Care Setting in Patients With COPD, Phase III: Sensitivity of the Step Test to Detect Improvement in Dyspnea Following Bronchodilation in Patients With COPD [NCT01655199]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-09-30Recruiting
The Role of Conformational Diseases on Macrophage Function [NCT01851642]220 participants (Anticipated)Observational2007-08-09Recruiting
A Phase 2, Single-Dose, Randomized, Active and Placebo Controlled, Four-Period, Cross-Over Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Intranasal Epinephrine After Administration of ARS -1 or Albuterol in Subjects With Persistent Asthma [NCT05363670]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-28Recruiting
A Randomised, Double-blind, Multi-centre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Fluticasone Furoate in the Treatment of Persistent Asthma in Adults and Adolescents Currently Receiving Mid to High Strength Inhaled Corticosteroids. [NCT01431950]Phase 3238 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, 5-way Crossover, Multicenter, Single-dose, Dose-ranging Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Albuterol Spiromax® and ProAir® HFA in Adult and Adolescent Subjects Ages 12 and Older With Persistent Asth [NCT01058863]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Bronchoprotection of Salbutamol in Asthma and COPD [NCT00440245]Phase 428 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
A Phase II Study to Investigate Mannitol Challenge as a Tool to Predict Treatment Response to Inhaled Corticosteroids in COPD [NCT00117182]Phase 2140 participants Interventional2005-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multi-Center Study of Albuterol Sulfate HFA Inhalation Aerosol Delivered Cumulatively With a Valved Holding Chamber and an Attached Facemask in Subjects Between Birth to 23 Months of Age With Acute Wheezing Due [NCT00144846]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Evaluation of Genetic Factors That May Account for Variability in the Response to Salbutamol Among Patients Suffering From Asthma [NCT00162396]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-08-31Recruiting
Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profiles of Albuterol Spiromax® and ProAir® HFA in Pediatric Patients With Persistent Asthma [NCT01844401]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Acute Bronchodilator Responsiveness in Obliterative Bronchiolitis (OB) Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT01112241]Phase 417 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Predictive Value of Within-breath Respiratory Input Impedance in the Early Diagnosis of Obliterative Bronchiolitis After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT01255449]26 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND, MULTIPLE DOSING (14 DAYS), PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, INCOMPLETE BLOCK CROSSOVER, MULTI CENTER STUDY TO ASSESS EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF THREE DOSE LEVELS OF AZD7594, GIVEN ONCE DAILY BY INHALATION, IN PATIENTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE ASTH [NCT02479412]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-25Completed
Outcomes and Costs Associated With Initiating Maintenance Treatment With Fluticasone Propionate 250mcg/Salmeterol Xinafoate 50mcg Combination (FSC) Versus Anticholinergics Including Tiotropium (TIO) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ( [NCT01331694]76,130 participants (Actual)Observational2009-07-31Completed
Cumulative Dose Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Albuterol in a Dry Powder Inhaler and an HFA MDI (Hydrofluoroalkane Metered Dose Inhaler) in Adult Patients With Asthma [NCT01056159]Phase 147 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Effect of LY2216684 on Heart Rate and Blood Pressure in Healthy Subjects Receiving Oral Doses of Albuterol or Propranolol [NCT01263197]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Influence of Mechanical Ventilation Modes on the Efficacy of Nebulized Bronchodilator in the Treatment of Patients With Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [NCT03271905]10 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-04-10Active, not recruiting
[NCT00462540]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
A 12-Week Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fp Spiromax® (Fluticasone Propionate Inhalation Powder) Administered Twice Daily Compared With Placebo in Adolescent and Adult Subjects With Severe Persistent Asthma Uncontrolled on High [NCT01576718]Phase 2889 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
Effect of the Use of Salbutamol on the Mechanical Properties of the Respiratory System of Healthy Individuals, Smokers and COPD Patients [NCT01521572]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-06-30Recruiting
A Randomized, Single-dose, Open-label, Two-way Crossover Pivotal Study to Assess the Bioequivalence Between Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Aerosol 108mcg Per Actuation (MDI, eq. to Albuterol 90mcg/Puff) and Proair HFA (Albuterol Sulfate) Inhalation Aerosol [NCT05300087]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-02-24Completed
A Randomized, Single-dose, Open-label, Two-way Crossover Pivotal Study to Assess the Bioequivalence Between Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Aerosol 108 mcg Per Actuation (MDI, eq. to Albuterol 90mcg/Puff) and Proair HFA (Albuterol Sulfate) Inhalation Aerosol [NCT04803734]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-19Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Increasing Doses of Inhaled Albuterol Administered by Metered Dose Inhalers in Children With Acute Wheezing Episodes [NCT01323010]119 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Randomized Controlled Trial of Epinephrine and Albuterol in Bronchiolitis [NCT00114478]600 participants Interventional2003-11-30Active, not recruiting
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel Group, 4-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and PK of Albuterol-HFA Versus Proventil-HFA in Pediatric Patients With Asthma in Pediatric Patients With Asthma [NCT00634517]Phase 348 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Terminated(stopped due to IND voluntarily withdrawn, without prejudice)
Initiation of Chronic Asthma Care Regimens in the Pediatric Emergency Department [NCT00388739]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Different study was designed)
Clinical Trials of Albuterol and Oxandrolone in FSH Dystrophy [NCT00027391]160 participants Interventional2001-09-30Completed
Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis With Copaxone (Glatiramer Acetate) and Albuterol [NCT00039988]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Parallel-Group Study of Levalbuterol in the Treatment of Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [NCT00665600]Phase 3257 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-02-28Completed
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Levalbuterol, Racemic Albuterol and Placebo in Subjects Twelve Years of Age and Older With Asthma [NCT00073840]Phase 3386 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
"CONNected Electronic Inhalers Asthma Control Trial 1 (CONNECT 1), a 12-Week Treatment, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel Group Comparison, Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Albuterol eMDPI Digital System, to Optimize Outc [NCT03890666]Phase 4333 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-26Completed
A Pilot Study to Determine the Most Effective Dose of Arformoterol for Treating Acute Asthmatic Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department and to Evaluate Its Side Effect and Safety Profile When Used in This Clinical Situation. [NCT00819637]Phase 42 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Unable to enroll r/t study design & staffing issues. The trial terminated.)
Personalized Medicine, Biomarker-based Study of Optimal Albuterol Regimens for Acute Asthma Exacerbations: DBRCT Pilot Study [NCT01196377]16 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Long Term Safety Study of Levalbuterol and Racemic Albuterol in Subjects Twelve Years of Age and Older With Asthma [NCT00064389]Phase 3746 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Levalbuterol, Racemic Albuterol and Placebo in Subjects Twelve Years of Age and Older With Asthma [NCT00073827]Phase 3445 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
Evaluation of β2 Genetic Polymorphisms and the Effect of Albuterol Inhalation on Potassium and Glucose Plasma Concentration [NCT00162487]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-08-31Recruiting
Fluticasone Furate/Vilaterol in Exercising Asthmatic Adolescents: a Randomized and Open Label Trial [NCT04750603]Phase 492 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-01Completed
Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Aerosolized Albuterol Versus Placebo in Acute Lung Injury [NCT00434993]Phase 2/Phase 3282 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Stopped for futility by DSMB)
Comparison of Parasympathetic Activity in Mild, Moderate, and Severe Asthma With Fixed Airway Obstruction [NCT05550402]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
Effect of Tiotropium on Airway Remodeling in Patients With Early Stage COPD Accessed by Optical Coherence Tomography [NCT03842839]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-01Recruiting
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy of SLITone in House Dust Mite Allergic Patients [NCT00633919]Phase 2/Phase 3124 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Single Center Trial of the Use of Heliox in Children Admitted to the Hospital With Status Asthmaticus [NCT00410150]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Study was stopped after interim analysis and slow enrollment.)
Effect on Body Composition With Albuterol and Caffeine Versus Placebo in Adolescents: A Pilot Study [NCT02740660]12 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
A Single-Dose Study to Assess the Efficacy of Albuterol SPIROMAX® in Adult and Adolescent Patients With Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction (EIB) [NCT01791972]Phase 338 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Dose-response of Salmeterol Delivered by Advair Diskus in Children: Bioassay by Methacholine Challenge Using Oscillometry as the Endpoint [NCT01907334]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
Efficacy, Dose-ranging and Safety Evaluation (A Randomized, Double- or Evaluator-blinded, Active- and Placebo-controlled, Single Dose, Five-arm, Crossover, and Dose-ranging Study of A006 in Adult Asthma Patients) [NCT02210806]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics and Safety of A006 in Healthy Volunteers (A Randomized, Double- or Evaluator-blinded, Single-dose, Four-arm, Crossover Pharmacokinetics (PK) Study in Healthy Adults) [NCT02271334]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
A Comparison of Symbicort Single Inhaler Therapy (Symbicort Turbuhaler 160/4.5 µg, 1 Inhalation b.i.d. Plus as Needed) and Conventional Best Practice for the Treatment of Persistent Asthma in Adults - a 26-Week, Randomised, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Mul [NCT00252863]Phase 31,600 participants Interventional2004-12-31Completed
A Randomized Double Blind Comparison Between Single Doses of Symbicort Turbuhaler (Budesonide/Formoterol Combination), Formoterol, Salbutamol and Placebo in Repeated AMP-challenges in Patients With Mild - to Moderate Asthma. Investigating the Supplementar [NCT00272753]Phase 420 participants Interventional2004-04-30Completed
"Pretreatment With Albuterol vs. Montelukast in Exercise Induced Bronchospasm in Children." [NCT00273689]Phase 413 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Comparison of Combivent® UDV (Ipratropium 500mcg and Salbutamol 2.5mg) and Salbutamol UDV Alone (2.5mg) in a Double-Blind Efficacy and Safety Study in Asthmatic Children With Severe Acute Exacerbation [NCT00273962]Phase 4500 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
Steroid-sparing Management of the Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/100µg b.i.d. Combination Compared to Fluticasone 200µg b.i.d. in Children and Adolescents With Moderate Asthma [NCT00315744]Phase 4285 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-04Completed
Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network Trial - Acute Intervention Management Strategies (AIMS) [NCT00319488]238 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
Mucociliary Clearance in Healthy Subjects: Comparison of Levalbuterol and Racemic Albuterol [NCT00325767]Phase 410 participants Interventional2004-05-31Completed
The Effect of Nebulized Albuterol on Donor Oxygenation [NCT00310401]Phase 2506 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network Trial - Treating Children to Prevent Exacerbations of Asthma (TREXA) [NCT00394329]Phase 3288 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
An Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability Study of Daily Dosing With Levalbuterol, Racemic Albuterol, and Placebo in Pediatric Subjects With Asthma [NCT01656811]Phase 2146 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-10-31Completed
The Cost Effectiveness of School-Based Supervised Asthma Therapy [NCT01997463]Phase 4442 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
The Development of Procedures to Optimalize the Intensive Care Units Patients Clinical Condition. Evaluation of Influence of Nebulized Bronchodilatory Drugs on Cardiac Repolarization [NCT01714401]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Non-Invasive HaemoDYNAMICs in Primary and Secondary Hypertension: the DYNAMIC-study [NCT01742702]2,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2006-05-25Recruiting
A Randomized, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Effect of Umeclidinium (UMEC) Added to Inhaled Corticosteroid/ Long-acting Beta-agonist Combination Therapy in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease COPD [NCT02257372]Phase 4236 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
A Randomised, Double-blind, Two-way Crossover Study to Investigate the Effect of Inhaled Fluticasone Furoate on Short-term Growth in Paediatric Subjects With Asthma [NCT02502734]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-07Completed
A Randomised Open-label Study to Compare the Effectiveness of the Fixed Dose Combination of FF/UMEC/VI (Using the Connected Inhaler System) With the Combination of FP/SAL Plus Tiotropium (Without the Connected Inhaler System) in Participants With Inadequa [NCT03376932]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-18Withdrawn(stopped due to withdrawn due to internal reasons)
Ivermectin Will be Used as an Outpatient Treatment Option for COVID-19 Patients. [NCT05045937]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2022-05-01Recruiting
Change in Oxygen Consumption Following Inhalation of Albuterol in Comparison With Levalbuterol in Healthy Adult Volunteers [NCT02802111]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
Comparative Effectiveness of COPD Assessment and Management Bundle Versus Usual Care in Patients Suspected of Having COPD [NCT01833026]56 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
A Multicentre, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Nebulized Fluticasone Propionate 1mg Twice Daily Compared With Oral Prednisone Administered for 7 Days to Chinese Pediat [NCT01687296]Phase 3261 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-12Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Immunotherapy With SCH 697243 (Phleum Pratense) in Children 5 to <18 Years of Age With a History of Grass Pollen Induced Rhinoconjunctivi [NCT00550550]Phase 3345 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Comparison of Breath-Enhanced and T-Piece Nebulizers in Children With Acute Asthma [NCT02566902]118 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Multi-center, Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Placebo and Active Controlled, Crossover Pharmacodynamic Bioequivalence Study of Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Aerosol, 0.09 mg in Stable Mild Asthma Patients [NCT05292976]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Business reasons)
Effect of Inhaled Albuterol on Pulmonary Hemodynamics in Patients With Group 1 Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension on Oral Pulmonary Vasodilator Therapy: A Proof of Concept Study [NCT03270332]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-05Completed
[NCT00005110]0 participants InterventionalSuspended
Comparison of Single-Dose Efficacy of Albuterol-HFA-BAI and Albuterol-HFA-MDI in Asthmatics With Poor Inhaler Coordinating Ability [NCT00530062]Phase 449 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-25Completed
Examining the Effect of Salbutamol Use in Asthma and/or Exercise Induced Bronchoconstriction Whilst Exercising in Ozone Air Pollution [NCT05087693]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-01Recruiting
A 24-week Randomised Exploratory Open-Label Study Aiming To Characterise Changes In Airway Inflammation, Symptoms, Lung Function, And Reliever Use In Asthma Patients Using SABA (Salbutamol) Or Anti-Inflammatory Reliever (SYMBICORT®) As Rescue Medication I [NCT03924635]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-01Completed
Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Single-Dose, Three-Treatment, Cross-Over Study of The Protective Effects Of Albuterol-HFA In Preventing Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction In Adolescent And Adult Asthmatic Patients [NCT00634829]Phase 324 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Terminated(stopped due to IND voluntarily withdrawn, without prejudice)
Randomized Control Trial of AccuPAP Device Versus Standard Nebulizer Therapy in Acute Asthma Exacerbation in Children [NCT02458482]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to The trainee for whom I designed the study did not begin enrollment and has left our institution.)
A Study of the Pharmacokinetics and Deposition of Inhaled Salbutamol in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (TOPICAL-IPF) [NCT01457261]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
The Effect of an Oral Beta-2 Agonist on Respiratory Muscle Strength in SCI [NCT02508311]Phase 45 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-01Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Small Airway Involvement in Patients With Chronic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis and Its Impact on Exercise Limitation [NCT02523833]27 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-01Completed
A 26-Week Randomized, Double-Blinded, Active Controlled Study Comparing the Safety of Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol Fumarate MDI Fixed Dose Combination Versus Mometasone Furoate MDI Monotherapy in Adolescents and Adults With Persistent Asthma (Protocol No [NCT01471340]Phase 411,744 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-09Completed
Evaluation of Salbutamol as an Adjuvant Therapy for Pompe Disease [NCT02405598]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Data Analysis for Drug Repurposing for Effective Alzheimer's Medicines (DREAM) - Salbutamol vs Long-acting Muscarinic Antagonists [NCT05457868]124,117 participants (Actual)Observational2021-02-01Active, not recruiting
Novel Nano-vesicles of Salbutamol Sulphate in Metered Dose Inhalers: Formulation, Characterization, In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation [NCT03059017]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-05Completed
Functional Studies of Novel Genes Mutated in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia II: Genotype to Phenotype [NCT04901715]Early Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-10Recruiting
Exclusion of Asthmatics From Clinical Trials Due to the 15 Percent Rule [NCT00940927]Phase 481 participants (Actual)Interventional1993-07-31Completed
A 12-week Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety and Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Albuterol Spiromax® Versus Placebo in Subjects 12 Years and Older With Persistent Asthma [NCT01747629]Phase 3160 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
A Single-Dose, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Placebo-Controlled, Five-Period Crossover, Dose-Ranging Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Albuterol Spiromax® and ProAir® HFA in Pediatric Patients With Persistent Asthma [NCT01899144]Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Continuous Levalbuterol for Treatment of Status Asthmaticus in Children [NCT00124176]Phase 481 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
A Prospective, Open-Label Assessment of the Albuterol Spiromax® DPI Integrated Dose Counter [NCT01857323]Phase 3317 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel, Multi-Center, 12-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Albuterol HFA Versus the Active Control, Proventil(R)-HFA in Adult and Adolescent Asthmatic Patients [NCT00635505]Phase 3300 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Terminated(stopped due to IND voluntarily withdrawn, without prejudice)
InSaKa Trial: Insulin Dextrose Infusion Versus Nebulized Salbutamol Versus Combination of Salbutamol and Insulin Dextrose in Acute Hyperkalemia: a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04012138]Phase 4525 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-20Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel Group Trial Comparing 12 Weeks Treatment With Tiotropium Inhalation Capsules 18 mcg Via the HandiHaler® Once Daily to Combivent® Inhalation Aerosol CFC MDI 2 Actuations q.i.d. in COPD Patients Currently P [NCT00388882]Phase 4327 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-04Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate Dupilumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Uncontrolled Asthma [NCT01854047]Phase 2776 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
A 6-month, Double-blind, Randomised, Multicenter, Multinational Trial to Investigate the Effect of 500 µg Roflumilast Tablets Once Daily Versus Placebo on Pulmonary Function in Patients With COPD. The ACROSS Trial [NCT01313494]Phase 3626 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Asthma Clinical Research Network (ACRN) [NCT00000577]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional1993-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Record is an ACRN grant summary & not reflective of an individual trial. All ACTs conducted by ACRN were individually registered on the PRS.)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of the Effect of the Combination of Umeclidinium and Vilanterol on Exercise Endurance Time in Subjects With COPD [NCT02275052]Phase 4198 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-23Completed
A Randomised, Multi-centre, Open Label, Cross-over Non-inferiority Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Neumoterol 400 and Symbicort Forte in Adults With Asthma [NCT02233803]Phase 4239 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-14Completed
A Phase III, 24 Week, Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group Study (With an Extension to 52 Weeks in a Subset of Subjects) Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Fixed Dose Triple Combination FF/UMEC/VI Administered Once Da [NCT02345161]Phase 31,811 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-23Completed
A 26-Week Open-Label Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety of Fluticasone Propionate Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler and Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients 12 Years of Age and Older With Persistent Asthma [NCT02175771]Phase 3758 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 15mg BID Losmapimod (GW856553) Compared to Placebo in Frequently Exacerbating Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [NCT02299375]Phase 2184 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-09Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study of Once-daily Inhaled Fluticasone Furoate Inhalation Powder for Six Weeks on the Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical Axis of Children Aged 5-11 Years With Asthma [NCT02483975]Phase 3111 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-09Completed
Repeat Emergency Department Visits Among Patients With Asthma and COPD [NCT02499887]6 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Exclusion criteria prevented enrollment of adequate # of participants)
Multinational, Double Blind, Randomised, Parallel Group Study on the Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Beclomethasone Dipropionate 250 mg Combined With Salbutamol 100 mg in the Treatment of Patients With Mild Persistent Asthma. [NCT00382889]Phase 3480 participants Interventional2002-08-31Completed
A 4-Week Randomized Cross-Over Study to Evaluate Daily Lung Function Following the Administration of Albuterol/Salbutamol and Ipratropium in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [NCT01691482]Phase 456 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-23Completed
The Effects of Bronchodilator Therapy On Respiratory and Autonomic Function in Patients With Familial Dysautonomia [NCT01987219]Phase 315 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
The Effect of NAC on Lung Function and CT Mucus Score [NCT03822637]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-20Recruiting
A Pilot Efficacy Study of Inhaled Albuterol Delivered With Akita Breath Control and Pari Nebulization for the Treatment of Adults With Moderate Asthma [NCT00385359]Phase 410 participants Interventional2006-10-31Recruiting
SHAMAL: A Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Active-Controlled, Phase IV Study to Assess the Reduction of Daily Maintenance ICS/LABA Treatment Towards Anti-Inflammatory Reliever Treatment in Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Treat [NCT04159519]Phase 4168 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-27Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Aerosolized Albuterol in Mechanically Ventilated Infants With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BDP) [NCT02766673]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Completed
Inhaled Beta-adrenergic Agonists to Treat Pulmonary Vascular Disease in Heart Failure With Preserved EF (BEAT HFpEF): A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02885636]Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
Comparison of Doses of Nebulized Magnesium Sulphate as an Adjuvant Treatment With Salbutamol in Children With Status Asthmaticus [NCT04929626]Phase 1126 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-01Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, 26-week Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NVA237 Given Once or Twice Daily, in Patients With Moderate and Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [NCT02371629]Phase 4776 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-24Completed
Inhaled Beta-2 Agonist Versus Epinephrine For Treatment of Transient Tachypnea of Newborn [NCT05006235]Phase 1135 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-01Completed
Study on Dose-response to Bronchodilator Then Bronchodilator Dose-finding Using the Flow Interruption Technique in Children Aged 2.5 TO 6 Years [NCT01470755]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
A Phase-II, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of MK-1029 in Adult Subjects With Persistent Asthma That is Uncontrolled While Receiving Montelukast. [NCT02720081]Phase 2142 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-11Completed
A Prospective Open Randomized Clinical Trial of Non-invasive Ventilation Versus Standard Therapy for Children Hospitalized With an Acute Exacerbation of Asthma. [NCT03296579]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-30Not yet recruiting
A 12-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Fluticasone Propionate Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler Compared With Fluticasone/Salmeterol Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler in Adolescent and Adult Patients With Persistent Asthma Symptom [NCT02141854]Phase 3882 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Comparison of the Pharmacodynamic Profile of Test and Reference Metered Dose Inhalers (MDIs) Containing Albuterol Sulfate Using Bronchoprovocation in Adult Patients With Stable Mild Asthma [NCT02584257]Phase 3217 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, 12-Week Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 80 or 160 mcg/Day of Beclomethasone Dipropionate Delivered Via Breath-Actuated Inhaler (BAI) or Metered-Dose Inhaler [NCT02040766]Phase 3628 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Placebo Controlled, Parallel-Group, 12-Week Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 320 or 640 mcg/Day of Beclomethasone Dipropionate Delivered Via Breath-Actuated Inhaler (BAI) or Metered-Dose Inhaler [NCT02031640]Phase 31,113 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Mechanisms for Dyspnea on Exertion in Children With Obesity and Asthma: Distinct Physiological Phenotypes [NCT04184609]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-07-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding ran out before participants were enrolled.)
Comparison of a Breath Enhanced High Density Jet Nebulizer With a Standard Jet Nebulizer for the Treatment of Children With a Moderate to Severe Asthma Exacerbation in the Emergency Department [NCT01951378]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Terminated(stopped due to No data are available for this study as the PI has left the institution.)
Assessment of Salbutamol Effect on Arterial Oxygenation in COPD Patients During One-lung Ventilation [NCT05914285]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-25Recruiting
ProAir Digihaler in COPD Disease Management: A Real World Study to Assess ProAir Digihaler Inhalation Parameters Thresholds and Their Use to Identify Deterioration in Clinical Practice [NCT04821869]27 participants (Actual)Observational2021-05-10Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Blinded, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled, 3-period Cross-over Study to Evaluate the Effect of QVA149 on Patient Reported Dyspnea in Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Using Tiotropium as an Active [NCT01490125]Phase 3247 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Lung Function Changes of Mild to Moderate Asthmatic Children Treated by Nebulized MgSO4 [NCT01799109]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Albuterol Dose-Response on Pulmonary Function Testing in Preterm Infants at Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia [NCT02447250]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-24Completed
Aerosolized Beta-Agonist Isomers in Asthma [NCT02170532]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
Nebulized Epinephrine Versus Nebulized Salbutamol in Bronchiolitis Among Children Aged 1month-24months [NCT03814954]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-01Completed
Quantifying the Presence of Lung Disease and Pulmonary Hypertension in Children With Sickle Cell Disease [NCT01895998]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
A 12-Week Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Propionate DPI Administered Twice Daily Compared With Placebo in Adolescent and Adult Subjects With Persistent Asthma Uncontrolled on Non-steroidal Therapy [NCT01479621]Phase 2909 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effect of Nebulized Budesonide and Oral Corticosteroids on Wheezing Episode Relapse in Pediatric Patients Following Discharge From the Emergency Department/Outpatient Care Facility [NCT00189436]Phase 461 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
Use of ProAir Digihaler in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) - Characterization of Inhalation Metrics From a Cohort of Patient At-risk for Acute Exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in an Outpatient Setting [NCT05241288]55 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-01Completed
Comparison of Acute Bronchodilator Effects of Ipratropium/Levosalbutamol 20/50 mcg Fixed Dose Combination Delivered Via pMDI and Salbutamol 100 mcg Inhaler Plus Ipratropium 20 mcg Inhalation Aerosol in Patients With Stable Moderate-Severe-Very Severe Chro [NCT04446637]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-03Withdrawn(stopped due to administrative decision)
The Various Effects of Gaseous Albuterol on Serum Lactate [NCT02073747]28 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
A Phase IIa, Randomised, Single Dose, Double-blind, Double-dummy, 6 Way Complete Cross-over, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of 4 Doses of LAS100977 QD Compared to Placebo and an Active Comparator in Patie [NCT01425801]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-01Completed
A Six-Period Crossover, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Four Doses of FS Spiromax (Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Xinafoate Inhalation Powder) Administered as Single Doses Compared With Single Doses of Fluticasone Propionate S [NCT01772368]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Nebulized In-line Endotracheal Dornase Alfa and Albuterol Administered to Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Case Series [NCT04387786]5 participants (Actual)Observational2020-03-31Completed
Emergency Department (ED) Use of Nebulized Budesonide as an Adjunct to Standardized Therapy in Acutely Ill Adults With Refractory Asthma: a Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT00588406]Phase 395 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Comparison of Conventional Medicine, TCM Treatment and Combination of Both Conventional Medicine and TCM Treatment for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Research Trial [NCT01836016]Phase 3360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-05-31Not yet recruiting
A Multi-Center 52-Week Study to Assess the Safety of Albuterol Spiromax® in Subjects With Asthma [NCT01698320]Phase 3364 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
[NCT00004685]90 participants Interventional1998-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Patients With Severe Steroid Dependent Asthma [NCT02528214]Phase 3210 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-15Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, 12-Week Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Beclomethasone Dipropionate (80 and 160 mcg/Day) Delivered Via Breath-Actuated Inhaler (BAI) in Adolescent and Adult Patients 12 Ye [NCT02040779]Phase 3273 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-26Completed
Is Levalbuterol an Effective Treatment With Less Cardiac Side Effects Than Albuterol in Hyperkalemia Patients: A Randomized-controlled Clinical Trial Protocol. [NCT05173584]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-04Recruiting
a Multicentre, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Phase III Trial of the Inhaled β2-adrenergic Receptor Agonist Salbutamol for Transient Tachypnoea of the Newborn (the REFSAL Trial) [NCT05527704]Phase 3608 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-31Recruiting
Effects of Noninvasive Ventilation Compared to Salbutamol in Respiratory Mechanics and Lung Function of Asthmatics After Bronchoprovocation: Randomized Cross-over Trial [NCT03430505]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-10Completed
A 12-Week Study to Evaluate the 24-Hour Pulmonary Function Profile of Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol (FF/VI) Inhalation Powder 100/25 mcg Once Daily Compared With Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Inhalation Powder 250/50 mcg Twice Daily in Subjects With [NCT01706328]Phase 3828 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-15Completed
Phosphodiesterase 4 Gene Variant and Salbutamol Response in Persistent Childhood Asthma [NCT03592212]99 participants (Actual)Observational2018-11-25Active, not recruiting
A Single Center Study to Measure the Bronchodilator Effect of Albuterol Sulfate or Albuterol Sulfate/Ipratropium Bromide Using the Pneuma Respiratory Inhaler and the ProAir HFA Inhaler in Stable COPD Patients [NCT03480997]Phase 146 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-27Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of MK-3641, a Ragweed (Ambrosia Artemisiifolia) Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablet, in Children With a History of Ragweed-Induced Rhinoconjunctivitis With or Without [NCT02478398]Phase 31,025 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-20Completed
Steroid Therapy in Acute Bronchiolitis A New Old Line of Therapy. [NCT03436225]Phase 180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-28Not yet recruiting
A Multi-centre, Open Label, Single Arm, 32-week Treatment Study in Subjects With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Not Optimally Controlled With Current Omalizumab Treatment Who Are Switched From Omalizumab to Mepolizumab 100mg Subcutaneous (Study Number 204471- [NCT02654145]Phase 4145 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-17Completed
An Open-label, Single-Center, Single-Dose, 3-Way Crossover Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Albuterol Administered by the Halix(TM) Albuterol Unit Dose Disposable Inhaler [NCT03373409]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-30Completed
A 12-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Fluticasone Propionate Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler Compared With Fluticasone/Salmeterol Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler in Adolescent and Adult Patients With Persistent Asthma Symptom [NCT02139644]Phase 3787 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Airway and Pulmonary Vascular Endothelial Function in Healthy Smokers: Effect of Inhaled Glucocorticosteroid Treatment [NCT02141633]31 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Multicentre Study to Compare the Efficacy of Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol 100/25mcg Versus Fluticasone Furoate 100mcg on Asthma Control in Patients With Uncontrolled Asthma [NCT03363191]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-07Withdrawn(stopped due to The study was withdrawn due to an internal decision.)
A Phase IIIB, 24-week Randomised, Double-blind Study to Compare 'Closed' Triple Therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) With 'Open' Triple Therapy (FF/VI + UMEC), in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [NCT02729051]Phase 31,055 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-29Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, 2-period Single-dose Cross-over Study to Assess the Early Bronchodilation of Glycopyrronium Bromide (44 μg o.d.) Compared to Tiotropium (18 µg. o.d.) in Patients With Moderate to Severe COPD (FAST Study) [NCT01922271]Phase 4152 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
A Phase 1/2 Double-Blind Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Albuterol on Motor Function in Individuals With Late-onset Pompe Disease Receiving Enzyme Replacement Therapy [NCT01885936]Phase 1/Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
A 12-week Treatment, Randomized, Blinded, Double-dummy, Parallel-group Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of NVA237 (50 µg o.d.) Compared to Tiotropium (18 µg o.d.) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [NCT01613326]Phase 3657 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Study DB2116961, A Multicentre, Randomised, Blinded, Parallel Group Study to Compare UMEC/VI (Umeclidinium/Vilanterol) in a Fixed Dose Combination With Indacaterol Plus Tiotropium in Symptomatic Subjects With Moderate to Very Severe COPD [NCT02257385]Phase 3967 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-15Completed
A Multi-national, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 3-period Crossover Study With GSK 573719 as Monotherapy in Adult Subjects With Asthma [NCT01641692]Phase 2350 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
A Three-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Chronic-Dose Safety and Efficacy Study of Albuterol Multi-Dose Dry Powder Inhaler (MDPI) Relative to Placebo in Pediatric Asthmatics [NCT02126839]Phase 3186 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Auscultation/Wheezing Assessment
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Chest Tightness Symptom Score
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Cough Symptom Score
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Difficulty Breathing Symptom Score
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Nasal Congestion Symptom Score
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Nasal Itching Symptom Score
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Nasal Sneezing Symptom Score
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Rhinorrhea Symptom Score
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Total Nasal Symptom Severity (TNSS)
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Wheeze Symptom Score
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) Between 25% and 75% of the Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%)
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Total Asthma Symptom Severity (TASS)
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average Number of Puffs of Albuterol/Salbutamol Used
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Interference With Daily Activities
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Interference With Sleep
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Nighttime Awakenings Due to Asthma
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Therapeutic Response to Asthma Symptoms
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Therapeutic Response to SAR Nasal Symptoms
NCT00124176 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Continuous Therapy
NCT00124176 (5) [back to overview]Change in Pediatric Asthma Severity Score
NCT00124176 (5) [back to overview]Serum Potassium Levels
NCT00124176 (5) [back to overview]Serum Albuterol S Isomer Levels
NCT00124176 (5) [back to overview]Heart Rate
NCT00189436 (3) [back to overview]Wheezing/Asthma/Bronchospasm Relapse Rate
NCT00189436 (3) [back to overview]Urinary Cortisol Levels
NCT00189436 (3) [back to overview]Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
NCT00308685 (2) [back to overview]Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Observed up to 2 Hours Following Completion of Dosing (FEV1max%0-2) at Day 22
NCT00308685 (2) [back to overview]Baseline-Adjusted Area Under the Percent-Predicted FEV1 Versus Time Curve Over 6 Hours (PPFEV1 AUEC0-6) at Day 22
NCT00310401 (4) [back to overview]Number of Donor Lungs Used for Transplantation
NCT00310401 (4) [back to overview]Donor Oxygenation
NCT00310401 (4) [back to overview]Chest X-ray Findings
NCT00310401 (4) [back to overview]Lung Compliance
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 2
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 3
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 4
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 5
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 7
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 8
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 9
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Evening PEFR at Week 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Patient Global Evaluation
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Evening PEFR at Week 10
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Evening PEFR at Week 11
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Evening PEFR at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Evening PEFR at Week 2
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Evening PEFR at Week 3
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Evening PEFR at Week 4
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Evening PEFR at Week 5
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Evening PEFR at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Evening PEFR at Week 7
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Evening PEFR at Week 8
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Evening PEFR at Week 9
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at -10 Minutes at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at -10 Minutes at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 1 Hour at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 1 Hour at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 1 Hour on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 15 Minutes at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 3 Hours at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 15 Minutes at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 15 Minutes on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 2 Hours at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 2 Hours at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 2 Hours on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 3 Hours at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 3 Hours on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 30 Minutes at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 30 Minutes at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 30 Minutes on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 4 Hours at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 4 Hours at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 4 Hours on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 6 Hours at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 6 Hours at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FEV1 at 6 Hours on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at -10 Minutes at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at -10 Minutes at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 1 Hour at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Physician Global Evaluation
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Physician Global Evaluation
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Patient Global Evaluation
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 3 Hours on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 9
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 8
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 7
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 5
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 4
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 3
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 2
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 11
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 10
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Morning PEFR at Week 9
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Morning PEFR at Week 8
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Morning PEFR at Week 7
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Morning PEFR at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Morning PEFR at Week 5
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Morning PEFR at Week 4
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Morning PEFR at Week 3
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Morning PEFR at Week 2
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Morning PEFR at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Morning PEFR at Week 11
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Morning PEFR at Week 10
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Morning Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) at Week 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 6 Hours on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 6 Hours at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 6 Hours at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 4 Hours on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 4 Hours at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 4 Hours at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 30 Minutes on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 30 Minutes at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 30 Minutes at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 3 Hours at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 3 Hours at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 2 Hours on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 2 Hours at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 2 Hours at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 15 Minutes on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 15 Minutes at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 15 Minutes at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 1 Hour on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]FVC at 1 Hour at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Average Hourly FEV1 AUC0-6 (Area Under the Curve From Zero to Six Hours) at 12 Weeks
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Average Hourly FEV1 AUC0-6 (Area Under the Curve From Zero to Six Hours) at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Average Hourly FEV1 AUC0-6 (Area Under the Curve From Zero to Six Hours) on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Average Hourly FVC AUC0-6 (Area Under the Curve From Zero to Six Hours) at 12 Weeks
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Average Hourly FVC AUC0-6 (Area Under the Curve From Zero to Six Hours) at 6 Weeks
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Average Hourly FVC AUC0-6 (Area Under the Curve From Zero to Six Hours) on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Peak FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Peak FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Peak FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Peak FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) at Week 12
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Peak FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) at Week 6
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Peak FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) on Day 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 12 Weeks
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 6 Weeks
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) at 12 Weeks
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) at 6 Weeks
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 1
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 10
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 11
NCT00359788 (114) [back to overview]Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 12
NCT00363480 (17) [back to overview]Assessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Pulse Rate
NCT00363480 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Symptom Score at Week 12
NCT00363480 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean ACT Score at Visit 6
NCT00363480 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Morning Percent Predicted Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Week 12
NCT00363480 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Additional Usage of Salbutamol at Week 12
NCT00363480 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)
NCT00363480 (17) [back to overview]Correlation of Change in AQLQ Score and Change in ACT Score
NCT00363480 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) Leading to a Change in Asthma Treatment
NCT00363480 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Occurrence of (Near-) Incidents Associated With Peak Flow Measurements
NCT00363480 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Number of Nights With no Nocturnal Awakening at Week 12
NCT00363480 (17) [back to overview]Assessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
NCT00363480 (17) [back to overview]Assessment of Tolerability by Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Serious and, Non-serious AE
NCT00363480 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) to Week 12
NCT00363480 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Percentage of Participants With ACT Score of 20-25 at Week 12
NCT00363480 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Emergency Visits Due to Asthma
NCT00363480 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Well Controlled and Totally Controlled Asthma at Week 12
NCT00363480 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Well Controlled Participants as Per Gaining Optimal Asthma Control (GOAL) Criteria After 12 Week Compared to Percentage of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score of 20-25 for Week 9 to Week 12
NCT00384189 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Lung Function Variable PEF by Spirometry
NCT00384189 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)
NCT00384189 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ) Overall
NCT00384189 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire Standard [PAQLQ(S)] Overall Score
NCT00384189 (13) [back to overview]Change in Use of Rescue Medications
NCT00384189 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Days With Asthma Control Based on Symptoms, Use of Rescue Medication, Morning PEF and PEF Fluctuation
NCT00384189 (13) [back to overview]Time to First Event of Lack of Efficacy (LOE) by Week 12
NCT00384189 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morning PEF From Diary
NCT00384189 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Days With Asthma Control Based on Symptoms, Use of Rescue Medication and Morning PEF
NCT00384189 (13) [back to overview]Change in Asthma Symptom Total Score
NCT00384189 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diurnal PEF Fluctuations
NCT00384189 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Lung Function Variable Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
NCT00384189 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Evening PEF From Diary
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Non-serious).
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview]Relapse / Readmission Numbers.
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview]Oxygen Saturation.
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Remaining in the Severe Asthma Category
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Moving From the Severe Asthma to Moderate Asthma Category
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Moving From the Severe Asthma to Mild Asthma Category
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview]Number of Patients Hospitalized
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview]Median Change in Asthma Score 2 Hours After Intervention
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change in Asthma Score at 2 Hours
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview]Change in Mean Heart Rate
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview]Serious Adverse Events
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change in Respiratory Rate.
NCT00394329 (10) [back to overview]Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV!)
NCT00394329 (10) [back to overview]Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Morning Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)
NCT00394329 (10) [back to overview]Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Measured in Parts Per Billion
NCT00394329 (10) [back to overview]Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate Variability (PEFR)
NCT00394329 (10) [back to overview]Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Asthma Control Test (ACT)
NCT00394329 (10) [back to overview]Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Asthma-specific Quality of Life Assessment
NCT00394329 (10) [back to overview]Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) Variability
NCT00394329 (10) [back to overview]Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Asthma Control Days
NCT00394329 (10) [back to overview]Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in Rescue Albuterol Puffs Per Day
NCT00394329 (10) [back to overview]Participants Experiencing an Asthma Exacerbation That Requires Systemic Corticosteroid Therapy
NCT00410150 (1) [back to overview]Length of Stay
NCT00434993 (10) [back to overview]Plasma Levels of IL-6 and IL-8 on Study Day 3
NCT00434993 (10) [back to overview]Number of ICU-free Days at 28 Days After Randomization
NCT00434993 (10) [back to overview]Number of Organ Failure-free Days at Day 28 Following Randomization
NCT00434993 (10) [back to overview]Ventilator Free Days to Day 28 in the Subset of Participants With ARDS
NCT00434993 (10) [back to overview]Ventilator Free Days to Day 28 in the Subset of Patients With Baseline Shock
NCT00434993 (10) [back to overview]Mortality Prior to Hospital Discharge With Unassisted Breathing to Day 60
NCT00434993 (10) [back to overview]Hospital Mortality up to Day 60 in Subjects With Baseline Shock
NCT00434993 (10) [back to overview]Hospital Mortality to Day 60 in the Subset of Participants With ARDS
NCT00434993 (10) [back to overview]Mortality Prior to Hospital Discharge With Unassisted Breathing to Day 90
NCT00434993 (10) [back to overview]Number of Ventilator Free Days (VFD)
NCT00521222 (5) [back to overview]Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Pre-Bronchodilator
NCT00521222 (5) [back to overview]Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Post-Bronchodilator
NCT00521222 (5) [back to overview]Change in Asthma Symptom Score
NCT00521222 (5) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Morning Peak Flow
NCT00521222 (5) [back to overview]Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Percent Predicted Pre-Bronchodilator
NCT00530062 (9) [back to overview]Area-Under-the-Effect Curve of Percent Change in Test-Day Baseline Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Versus Time (up to 2 Hours Postdose), %FEV1 AUEC0-2
NCT00530062 (9) [back to overview]Time to a 15% Increase From Baseline in FEV1 Within 2 Hours Postdose
NCT00530062 (9) [back to overview]Time to a 12% Increase From Baseline in FEV1 Within 2 Hours Postdose
NCT00530062 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a 15% Increase From Baseline in FEV1 Within 2 Hours Postdose
NCT00530062 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a 12% Increase From Baseline in FEV1 Within 2 Hours Postdose
NCT00530062 (9) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in FEV1 up to 2 Hours Postdose
NCT00530062 (9) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Increase in FEV1
NCT00530062 (9) [back to overview]Area-Under-the-Effect Curve of Change in Test-Day Baseline FEV1 Versus Time (up to 2 Hours Postdose), FEV1 AUEC0-2
NCT00530062 (9) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in FEV1 Within 30 Minutes Postdose
NCT00550550 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Weekly Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Total Score Over the Entire GPS
NCT00550550 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) Over the Entire GPS
NCT00550550 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Symptom Scores (DSS) Over the Entire GPS
NCT00550550 (4) [back to overview]Participant Total Combined Symptom (TCS) Score Over the Entire Grass Pollen Season (GPS)
NCT00562159 (4) [back to overview]Participant Total Combined Symptom (TCS) Score Over the Entire Grass Pollen Season (GPS)
NCT00562159 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Weekly Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (RQLQ(S)) Total Score Over the Entire GPS
NCT00562159 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Symptom Score (DSS) Over the Entire GPS
NCT00562159 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) Over the Entire GPS
NCT00577655 (17) [back to overview]Participant Responses: Percentage of Participants With a >=12% Increase in Baseline PEF Within 30 Minutes Post-Dose on Days 1 and 22
NCT00577655 (17) [back to overview]Participant Responses: Percentage of Participants With a >=15% Increase in Baseline FEV1 Within 30 Minutes Post-Dose on Days 1 and 22
NCT00577655 (17) [back to overview]Participant Responses: Percentage of Participants With a >=15% Increase in Baseline PEF Within 30 Minutes Post-Dose on Days 1 and 22
NCT00577655 (17) [back to overview]Baseline Adjusted Area-under-the-Effect Curve for Percent of Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Over 6 Hours Post-dose on Day 22 Using Both Day 1 and Day 22 Baselines
NCT00577655 (17) [back to overview]Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Observed up to Two Hours Post Dose (FEV1max%0-2) on Day 22
NCT00577655 (17) [back to overview]The Number of Asthma-Related Nocturnal Awakenings Per Week Requiring the Use of Rescue Medication
NCT00577655 (17) [back to overview]Time To Maximum Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Over Six Hours Post-Dose On Days 1 and 22
NCT00577655 (17) [back to overview]Time To Maximum Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over Six Hours Post-Dose On Days 1 and 22
NCT00577655 (17) [back to overview]Weekly Average Highest (Worst) Daily Asthma Symptom Scores for Weeks 1, 2 and 3
NCT00577655 (17) [back to overview]Weekly Average Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Taken Each Day for Study Weeks 1, 2 and 3
NCT00577655 (17) [back to overview]Weekly Average Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Obtained Pre-Dose Each Morning
NCT00577655 (17) [back to overview]Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Observed up to Two Hours Post Dose (PEFmax%0-2) on Day 22
NCT00577655 (17) [back to overview]Baseline-Adjusted Area-under-the Effect Curve for Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over 6 Hours Post-dose on Day 22 Using Both Day 1 and Day 22 Baselines
NCT00577655 (17) [back to overview]Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) up to Two Hours Post-Dose (FEV1max%0-2, %) on Study Days 1 and 22 Using Observed Cases
NCT00577655 (17) [back to overview]Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) up to Two Hours Post-Dose (PEFmax%0-2) on Study Days 1 and 22 Using Observed Cases
NCT00577655 (17) [back to overview]Maximum Percent-Predicted FEV1 (Max PPFEV1, %) Observed up to Two Hours Following Completion of Dosing on Study Days 1 and 22 (Observed Case)
NCT00577655 (17) [back to overview]Participant Responses: Percentage of Participants With a >=12% Increase in Baseline FEV1 Within 30 Minutes Post-Dose on Days 1 and 22
NCT00583947 (15) [back to overview]Mean Heart Rate
NCT00583947 (15) [back to overview]Change From Predose in Mean Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)
NCT00583947 (15) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of (R,R) Formoterol
NCT00583947 (15) [back to overview]Mean Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT00583947 (15) [back to overview]Mean Serum Potassium Levels
NCT00583947 (15) [back to overview]Mean Serum Glucose Values
NCT00583947 (15) [back to overview]Mean Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)
NCT00583947 (15) [back to overview]Change From Predose in Mean Heart Rate
NCT00583947 (15) [back to overview]Mean Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second(FEV1)
NCT00583947 (15) [back to overview]Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT00583947 (15) [back to overview]Change From Predose of Mean Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
NCT00583947 (15) [back to overview]Change From Predose in Mean Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT00583947 (15) [back to overview]Change From Predose in Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT00583947 (15) [back to overview]Change From Predose in Mean Serum Potassium
NCT00583947 (15) [back to overview]Change From Predose in Mean Serum Glucose
NCT00585039 (2) [back to overview]Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Sec (FEV1) Measured in L/Sec
NCT00585039 (2) [back to overview]Clinical Asthma Score (CAS)
NCT00588406 (2) [back to overview]Hospitalization
NCT00588406 (2) [back to overview]FEV1 Percent Predicted
NCT00633919 (5) [back to overview]Average Daily Asthma Medication Score During a 2-months Evaluation Period in Autumn 2008
NCT00633919 (5) [back to overview]Global Evaluation of Efficacy by Investigator at the End of the Evaluation Period in Autumn 2008
NCT00633919 (5) [back to overview]Global Evaluation of Efficacy by Subject and Investigator at the End of the Evaluation Period in Autumn 2007
NCT00633919 (5) [back to overview]Global Evaluation of Efficacy by Subject at the End of The Evaluation Period in 2008
NCT00633919 (5) [back to overview]Average Daily Asthma Medication Score During a 2-months Evaluation Period in Autumn 2007
NCT00669617 (1) [back to overview]Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at 5 Minutes Post-dose
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in In-Clinic Peak Expiratory Flow to Postdose Timepoint at Visit 4
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Rescue Medication Use - Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Doses Used Per Week
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Rescue Medication Use - Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Days Used Per Week When Used
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in the At-Home Mean Daily Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF to Postdose Timepoint at Visit 3 and Visit 4)
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in In-Clinic Peak Expiratory Flow to Postdose Timepoints at Visit 4
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Investigator Global Assessment - Question 2
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in In-Clinic Peak Expiratory Flow to Postdose Timepoints at Visit 2
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in In-Clinic Peak Expiratory Flow to Postdose Timepoints at Visit 3
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Visit 4 in the Mean Daily Composite Score Based on the Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Assessments (PACA)
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Visit 4 in the Mean Daily Composite Score Based on the Daytime and Nighttime Asthma Symptom Scores as Measured by Pediatric Asthma Questionnaire
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Visit 3 to Visit 4 in the Mean Daily Composite Score Based on the Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Assessment
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Visit 3 to Visit 4 in the Mean Daily Composite Score Based on the Daytime and Nighttime Asthma Symptom Score as Measured by the Pediatric Asthma Questionnaire
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Visit 3 in the Mean Daily Composite Score Based on the Daytime and Nighttime Asthma Symptom Scores as Measured by the Pediatric Asthma Questionnaire (PAQ)
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Visit 3 in Mean Daily Composite Score Based on the Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Assessment
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Visit 2 to Visit 3 in the Mean Daily Composite Score Based on the Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Assessment
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Visit 2 to Visit 3 in the Mean Daily Composite Score Based on the Daytime and Nighttime Asthma Symptom Scores as Measured by the Pediatric Asthma Questionnaire
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in In-Clinic Peak Expiratory Flow to Postdose Timepoint at Visit 3
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the At-Home Mean Daily Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF to Postdose Timepoint at Visit 3 and Visit 4
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in In-Clinic Peak Expiratory Flow to Postdose Timepoints at Visit 2
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Caregiver Global Assessment - Question 3
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Caregiver Global Assessment - Question 2
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Caregiver Global Assessment - Question 1
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Visit 3 and Visit 4 in the Pediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLA) Composite Score
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Investigator Global Assessment - Question 1
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Rescue Medication Use - Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Doses Used Per Week During Weeks When Used
NCT00809757 (26) [back to overview]Rescue Medication Use: Number of Subjects Using Rescue Medication During the Treatment Period
NCT00818454 (10) [back to overview]Peak FEV1 Response (Crossover Part of the Study)
NCT00818454 (10) [back to overview]Puffs Open-label Albuterol Used During Night (Crossover Part of the Study)
NCT00818454 (10) [back to overview]Puffs Open-label Albuterol Used During Day (Crossover Part of the Study)
NCT00818454 (10) [back to overview]Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Crossover Part of the Study)
NCT00818454 (10) [back to overview]Asthma Control Questionnaire (Crossover Part of the Study)
NCT00818454 (10) [back to overview]FEV1 AUC0-6 Response (Parallel Part of the Study)
NCT00818454 (10) [back to overview]FEV1 AUC0-6 Response (Crossover Part of the Study)
NCT00818454 (10) [back to overview]Peak FEV1 Response
NCT00818454 (10) [back to overview]Puffs Study Medication Used During Night (Crossover Part of the Study)
NCT00818454 (10) [back to overview]Puffs Study Medication Used During Day (Crossover Part of the Study)
NCT00940927 (2) [back to overview]Effect Maximum (Emax)
NCT00940927 (2) [back to overview]Effective Dose 50% (ED50)
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 24
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 12
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 48
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 36
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 3
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 24
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 12
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 0
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 48
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 36
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 36
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 12
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Number of Patients Having Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations Leading to Hospitalization
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Number of Patients Having Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 48
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 36
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 3
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 24
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 0
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 0
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Day 1
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 0
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 24
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 48
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FVC at Day 1
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 48
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 36
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 3
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 24
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 12
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 12
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 24
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 48
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 12
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 24
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 3
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 48
NCT01019694 (39) [back to overview]Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 3
NCT01058863 (3) [back to overview]Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6)
NCT01058863 (3) [back to overview]Baseline-adjusted Percent-Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (PPFEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6)
NCT01058863 (3) [back to overview]Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
NCT01096017 (12) [back to overview]FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 240 Minutes After Inhalations of Study Drug as Percentage of Pre-dose
NCT01096017 (12) [back to overview]FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 30 Minutes After Inhalations of Study Drug as Percentage of Pre-dose
NCT01096017 (12) [back to overview]FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 5 Minutes After Inhalations of Study Drug as Percentage of Pre-dose
NCT01096017 (12) [back to overview]FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 60 Minutes After Inhalations of Study Drug as Percentage of Pre-dose
NCT01096017 (12) [back to overview]Maximum % Change in FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) Within 4 Hours After Drug Inhalation
NCT01096017 (12) [back to overview]Number of Patients With % Change in FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) >15% Within 4 Hours After Drug Inhalation
NCT01096017 (12) [back to overview]FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 180 Minutes After Inhalations of Study Drug as Percentage of Pre-dose
NCT01096017 (12) [back to overview]Time to Peak FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) Within 4 Hours After Drug Inhalation
NCT01096017 (12) [back to overview]FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) Area Under Curve (AUC) 0-4 Hours After Drug Inhalation
NCT01096017 (12) [back to overview]FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 15 Minutes After Inhalations of Study Drug as Percentage of Pre-dose
NCT01096017 (12) [back to overview]FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 120 Minutes After Inhalations of Study Drug as Percentage of Pre-dose
NCT01096017 (12) [back to overview]Time to Change More Than or Equal to 15% (Time to Onset Response) Within 4 Hours After Drug Inhalation
NCT01112241 (10) [back to overview]Per Cent Change of Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) After Bronchodilators
NCT01112241 (10) [back to overview]Per Cent Change of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) After Bronchodilators
NCT01112241 (10) [back to overview]Per Cent Change of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) After Bronchodilators
NCT01112241 (10) [back to overview]Absolute Change of Residual Volume (RV) After Bronchodilators
NCT01112241 (10) [back to overview]Absolute Change of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) After Bronchodilators
NCT01112241 (10) [back to overview]Absolute Change of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) After Bronchodilators
NCT01112241 (10) [back to overview]Absolute Change of Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) After Bronchodilators
NCT01112241 (10) [back to overview]Per Cent Change of Residual Volume (RV) After Bronchodilators
NCT01112241 (10) [back to overview]Per Cent Change of Partial Forced Expiratory Flow (V'Part) After Bronchodilators
NCT01112241 (10) [back to overview]Per Cent Change of Instantaneous Maximal Forced Expiratory Flow (V'Max) After Bronchodilators
NCT01120691 (13) [back to overview]Time to First Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbation Between QVA149, NVA237 and Open Label Tiotropium During the Treatment Period
NCT01120691 (13) [back to overview]Time to Study Withdrawal or Premature Discontinuation for Any Reason Between QVA149 (110/50 µg q.d.), NVA237 (50 µg q.d.) and Open Label Tiotropium (18 µg q.d.) During the Treatment Period.
NCT01120691 (13) [back to overview]Cumulative Rates of Moderate or Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations for Multiple COPD Exacerbation at Different Time Points
NCT01120691 (13) [back to overview]Change in Mean Daily Use (Number of Puffs) of Rescue Therapy Between QVA149, NVA237 and Open Label Tiotropium From Baseling Over the 64 Week Treatment Period
NCT01120691 (13) [back to overview]Pre-dose Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)After 4, 12, 26, 38, 52 and 64 Weeks of Treatment Between QVA149, NVA237 and Open Label Tiotropium
NCT01120691 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Moderate or Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations Requiring the Use of Both Systemic Glucocorticosteroids and Antibiotics
NCT01120691 (13) [back to overview]St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Scores Between QVA149, NVA237 and Open Label Tiotropium Over 12, 26, 38, 52 and 64 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01120691 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Study Withdrawal or Premature Discontinuation for Any Reason Between QVA149 (110/50 µg q.d.), NVA237 (50 µg q.d.) and Open Label Tiotropium (18 µg q.d.)During the Treatment Period
NCT01120691 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Percentage of Days Without Rescue Therapy Use Between QVA149,NVA237 and Open Label Tiotropium Over the 64 Week Treatment Period
NCT01120691 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations in QVA149 and Open-label Tiotropium Treatment Arms During the Treatment Period.
NCT01120691 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations in QVA149 and NVA237 Treatment Arms During the Treatment Period.
NCT01120691 (13) [back to overview]Number of Days With Moderate or Severe Exacerbation That Required Treatment With Systemic Corticosteroids and Antibiotics
NCT01120691 (13) [back to overview]Pre-dose Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV-1) After 4, 12, 26, 38, 52 and 64 Weeks of Treatment Between QVA149, NVA237 and Open Label Tiotropium
NCT01143688 (2) [back to overview]Asthma Symptoms
NCT01143688 (2) [back to overview]Change in FEV1
NCT01151579 (3) [back to overview]Total Number of Participants With Arrhythmias
NCT01151579 (3) [back to overview]Heart Rate in Beats Per Minute
NCT01151579 (3) [back to overview]Arrhythmias
NCT01196377 (1) [back to overview]%FEV1
NCT01218009 (3) [back to overview]Pulse at Screening and End of Study
NCT01218009 (3) [back to overview]Blood Pressure at Screening and End of Study
NCT01218009 (3) [back to overview]Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
NCT01255449 (2) [back to overview]Airway Distensibility With Lung Inflation After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
NCT01255449 (2) [back to overview]Post-HSCT Changes in Lung Tissue Density
NCT01263197 (3) [back to overview]Maximum, Minimum and Average Changes in Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT01263197 (3) [back to overview]Maximum, Minimum and Average Changes in Heart Rate
NCT01263197 (3) [back to overview]Maximum, Minimum and Average Changes in Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT01312961 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (5-question Version [ACQ-5]) to Week 12
NCT01312961 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow in One Second (FEV1) to Week 12
NCT01312961 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Scores to Week 12
NCT01312961 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score to Week 12
NCT01312961 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Scores to Week 12
NCT01312961 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Albuterol or Levalbuterol to Week 12
NCT01312961 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Day to Week 12
NCT01312961 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Composite Asthma Events
NCT01312961 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Asthma Exacerbation
NCT01312961 (11) [back to overview]Time to First Asthma Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12
NCT01312961 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) to Week 12
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Flow 25-75%
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in First Second (FEV1)
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Time to Onset of First Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbation
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in First Three Seconds (FEV3)
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Post-bronchodilator FEV1
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in First Six Seconds (FEV6)
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Post-bronchodilator Ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume After 1 Second to Forced Vital Capacity
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in COPD Symptom Scores
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Total Score at Week 24
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Time to Onset of Second Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbation
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Flow 25-75%
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEF)
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume After 1 Second to Forced Expiratory Volume After 6 Seconds
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume After 1 Second to Forced Vital Capacity
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Use of Rescue Medication
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Post-bronchodilator Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEF)
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Mean Rate of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations Per Patient Per Year
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in First Six Seconds (FEV6)
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in First Three Seconds (FEV3)
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Post-bronchodilator Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
NCT01313494 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Post-bronchodilator Ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume After 1 Second to Forced Expiratory Volume After 6 Seconds
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Hospital Admission
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Lengths of Stay in the Emergency Room
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Need for Additional Therapies
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Change in Pulse Oximetry One Hour Post-treatment
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Admission Rates in Patients With and Without Any Virus Detected
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Admission Rates in Patients With and Without Rhinovirus Detect
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Admission Rates in Patients With the Arg16Gly Polymorphisms
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Albuterol Determination in the Plasma
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Change in PRAM Score After One Hour
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Changes in Bicarbonate Serum Levels
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Changes in Glucose Serum Levels
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Changes in Heart Rate After One Hour
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Changes in Heart Rate at Discharge or Hospital Admission
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Changes in Potassium Serum Levels
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Changes in PRAM Score at Discharge or Hospital Admission
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Changes in Pulse Oximetry at Discharge or Hospital Admission.
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Changes in Respiratory Rate After One Hour
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Changes in Respiratory Rate at at Discharge or Hospital Admission.
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Electrocardiogram at Baseline
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Electrocardiogram at Discharge or Hospital Admission
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Electrocardiogram One Hour Post-treatment.
NCT01323010 (22) [back to overview]Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second
NCT01323621 (2) [back to overview]Time to Onset on Treatment Day 1
NCT01323621 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Trough in 24-Hour Weighted Mean FEV1 on Treatment Day 84
NCT01331694 (2) [back to overview]Average Annual Adjusted Post-Index COPD-Related Costs
NCT01331694 (2) [back to overview]Time to First Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Event
NCT01424813 (7) [back to overview]Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6) on Day 85
NCT01424813 (7) [back to overview]Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6) Over the 12-week Treatment Period
NCT01424813 (7) [back to overview]Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01424813 (7) [back to overview]Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Assessments
NCT01424813 (7) [back to overview]Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6) on Day 1
NCT01424813 (7) [back to overview]Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6) on Day 8
NCT01424813 (7) [back to overview]Physical Examination Findings Shifts From Baseline to Endpoint by Treatment Group
NCT01425801 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
NCT01425801 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Normalized Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0-24h at Day 1
NCT01425801 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Normalized Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under the Curve (AUC)
NCT01425801 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
NCT01425801 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
NCT01425801 (16) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) at Each Timepoint
NCT01425801 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Timepoint
NCT01425801 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) at Each Timepoint
NCT01425801 (16) [back to overview]Absolute Values of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Timepoint
NCT01425801 (16) [back to overview]Absolute Values of Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) at Each Timepoint
NCT01425801 (16) [back to overview]Time to Peak Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
NCT01425801 (16) [back to overview]Time to Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
NCT01425801 (16) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
NCT01425801 (16) [back to overview]Peak Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
NCT01425801 (16) [back to overview]Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
NCT01425801 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
NCT01431950 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Evening (Pre-bronchodilator and Pre-dose) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at the End of the 24-week Treatment Period
NCT01431950 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Symptom-free 24-hour (hr) Periods Over the 24-week Treatment Period
NCT01431950 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free 24-hour (hr) Periods Over the 24-week Treatment Period
NCT01431950 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) PEF Averaged Over the 24-week Treatment Period
NCT01431950 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Daily Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the 24-week Treatment Period
NCT01471340 (3) [back to overview]Time-to-First Severe Asthma Exacerbation (SAEX): Number of First SAEX in the MF/F vs MF Arms
NCT01471340 (3) [back to overview]Number of SAO Components in MF/F Participants vs MF Participants
NCT01471340 (3) [back to overview]Time-to-First Serious Asthma Outcomes (SAO): Number of First SAO in the MF/F vs MF Arms
NCT01479621 (13) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Fp
NCT01479621 (13) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Remaining in the Study at Week 12
NCT01479621 (13) [back to overview]Area Under The Curve From Time 0 Until The Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) of Fp
NCT01479621 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Weekly Average Of Daily Trough (Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period Inclusive of Flovent Diskus Data
NCT01479621 (13) [back to overview]Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period
NCT01479621 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Weekly Average Of Daily Trough (Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT01479621 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Weekly Average Of Daily Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period Inclusive of Flovent Diskus Data
NCT01479621 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Weekly Average Of Daily Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT01479621 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Trough (Morning Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period Inclusive of Flovent Diskus Data
NCT01479621 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Trough (Morning Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT01479621 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-Free 24-hour Periods During the 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT01479621 (13) [back to overview]Oropharyngeal Exam Findings at Each Study Visit
NCT01479621 (13) [back to overview]Time of Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Fp
NCT01490125 (6) [back to overview]Total Total Transient Dyspnea Index (TDI) Score After 6 Weeks of Treatment QVA149 Compared to Tiotropium
NCT01490125 (6) [back to overview]Total Total Transient Dyspnea Index (TDI) Score After 6 Weeks of Treatment QVA149 Compared to Placebo
NCT01490125 (6) [back to overview]Standardized Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under the Curve (AUC) 5min-4 Hrs After First Dose and 6 Weeks of Treatment With QVA149 Compared to Placebo and Tiotropium
NCT01490125 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in The Capacity of Daily Living During the Morning (CDLM) Score Averaged Over 6 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01490125 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Used Over the 6 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01490125 (6) [back to overview]Standardized Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) 5min-4h After First Dose and 6 Weeks of Treatment With QVA149 Compared to Placebo and Tiotropium
NCT01576718 (14) [back to overview]Time Of Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax)
NCT01576718 (14) [back to overview]24-Hour Urinary Cortisol Excretion at Baseline, Week 12 and Endpoint
NCT01576718 (14) [back to overview]Patients With Positive Swab Test Results for Oral Candidiasis
NCT01576718 (14) [back to overview]Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period
NCT01576718 (14) [back to overview]The Kaplan-Meier Estimate Of The Probability Of Remaining In The Study At Week 12
NCT01576718 (14) [back to overview]Area Under The Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero To The Time Of The Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t)
NCT01576718 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In The Percentage Of Rescue-Free 24-Hour Periods
NCT01576718 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Trough (Morning Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT01576718 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Trough (Morning Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period (Including the Flovent Diskus Treatment Arm)
NCT01576718 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Weekly Average Of Daily Trough (Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT01576718 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Weekly Average Of Daily Trough (Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period (Including the Flovent Diskus Treatment Arm)
NCT01576718 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Weekly Average Of Daily Trough (Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT01576718 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Weekly Average Of Daily Trough (Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period (Including the Flovent Diskus Treatment Arm)
NCT01576718 (14) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
NCT01613326 (13) [back to overview]Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score After 4 Weeks and 12 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01613326 (13) [back to overview]Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Day 1 and Week 4
NCT01613326 (13) [back to overview]Standardized Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) (5 Min-4 h) Post-dose
NCT01613326 (13) [back to overview]Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) During 5 Min to 4 Hours Post-dose, at Day 1 and Week 12
NCT01613326 (13) [back to overview]Inspiratory Capacity (IC) at Each Time-point, by Visit
NCT01613326 (13) [back to overview]Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Time-point by Visit
NCT01613326 (13) [back to overview]Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Time-point by Visit
NCT01613326 (13) [back to overview]Event Free Rate at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 After Treatment
NCT01613326 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Used Over the 12 Week Treatment
NCT01613326 (13) [back to overview]Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Non-inferiority Analysis)
NCT01613326 (13) [back to overview]Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Analysis of Superiority)
NCT01613326 (13) [back to overview]St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire Total Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01613326 (13) [back to overview]Mean Daily, Daytime and Nighttime (Combined) Symptom Scores Over the 12 Week Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated 24 Hour Holter Findings
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Pre-treatment Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over Day 7 to Day 14 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (BL) in the Weighted Mean (WM) 0-24 Hour FEV1 Obtained Post-AM Dose on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematocrit on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Puffs Per Day of Rescue Albuterol/Salbutamol Over Day 7 to Day 14 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 on Day 15 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Asthma Exacerbations During the Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Urine pH on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Urine Specific Gravity on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Albumin, Total Protein, and Hemoglobin on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Creatine Kinase (CK), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) and Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Total Neutrophils (ANC - Absolute Neutrophil Count), Platelet, and Leukocytes Count on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Calcium, Chloride, Carbon Dioxide, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, and Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, and Creatinine on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Segmented Neutrophils in Blood on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Abnormal Electrocardiogram Findings
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Change in Baseline in Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours After the Morning Dose on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Final Dose-response Model for Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants for the Indicated Urinalysis Parameters Tested by Dipstick on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period
NCT01641692 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
NCT01687296 (8) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Scoring Index at Day 5 and Day 8
NCT01687296 (8) [back to overview]Mean Global Evaluation for Efficacy by Participant/Parent and Investigator
NCT01687296 (8) [back to overview]Mean Evening PEF on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period
NCT01687296 (8) [back to overview]Mean Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (AM PEF) on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period in Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population
NCT01687296 (8) [back to overview]Mean Morning PEF on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period in Per Protocol (PP) Population
NCT01687296 (8) [back to overview]Median Number of Use of Rescue Medications During Day and Night Over the Treatment Assessment Period
NCT01687296 (8) [back to overview]Clinical Assessment of Lung Function of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) During the Treatment Period
NCT01687296 (8) [back to overview]Median Day-time and Night-time Symptom Scores Over the Treatment Assessment Period
NCT01691482 (7) [back to overview]Variability in Daily Inspiratory Capacity (IC), Estimated by Coefficient of Variation
NCT01691482 (7) [back to overview]Variability in Daily IC, Estimated by Half Range (i.e., Half the Difference Between Maximum and Minimum)
NCT01691482 (7) [back to overview]Variability in Daily FEV1, Estimated by Coefficient of Variation
NCT01691482 (7) [back to overview]The Maximal Bronchodilator Response for the First Administered Agent
NCT01691482 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Days for Which Participants Achieved a Threshold Increase From Baseline in FEV1 of 100 mL, 200 mL, and 250 mL
NCT01691482 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Days for Which Participants Achieved a >=12% and 200 Milliliter (mL) Increase From Baseline in FEV1
NCT01691482 (7) [back to overview]Variability in Daily FEV1, Estimated by Half Range (i.e., Half the Difference Between Maximum and Minimum Values)
NCT01698320 (6) [back to overview]Participants With Adverse Experiences During Weeks 13-52 (Open-Label Period)
NCT01698320 (6) [back to overview]Participants With Adverse Experiences During Weeks 0-12 (Double-Blind Period)
NCT01698320 (6) [back to overview]Participants With Abnormal and Clinically Relevant Physical Exam Findings at Weeks 0, 12 and 52
NCT01698320 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Measurements to Week 12 and Week 52
NCT01698320 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure Measurements to Week 12 and Week 52
NCT01698320 (6) [back to overview]Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results At Weeks 0, 12, and 52
NCT01706328 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 on Treatment Day 85
NCT01706328 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Trough in Weighted-mean 24-hour Serial Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) on Treatment Day 84
NCT01706328 (3) [back to overview]Time to Onset on Treatment Day 1
NCT01721291 (1) [back to overview]ANALYSIS OF LUNG DEPOSITION - Penetration Index
NCT01747629 (14) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) for Albuterol on Days 1 and 8
NCT01747629 (14) [back to overview]Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01747629 (14) [back to overview]Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Assessments
NCT01747629 (14) [back to overview]Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6) on Day 1
NCT01747629 (14) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 (Pre-dose) to 24 Hours Post-dose(AUC0-24) for Albuterol on Day 8
NCT01747629 (14) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 (Pre-dose) to Infinity Post-dose(AUC0-inf) for Albuterol on Day 1
NCT01747629 (14) [back to overview]Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6) on Day 8
NCT01747629 (14) [back to overview]Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6) on Day 85
NCT01747629 (14) [back to overview]Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6) Over the 12-week Treatment Period
NCT01747629 (14) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 (Pre-dose) to Last Time of Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) for Albuterol on Days 1 and 8
NCT01747629 (14) [back to overview]Physical Examination Findings Shifts From Baseline to Endpoint by Treatment Group
NCT01747629 (14) [back to overview]Terminal Plasma Half-life (t1/2) for Albuterol on Days 1 and 8
NCT01747629 (14) [back to overview]Time to Observed Peak Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Albuterol on Days 1 and 8
NCT01747629 (14) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 (Pre-dose) up to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6) for Albuterol on Days 1 and 8
NCT01772368 (6) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Salmeterol
NCT01772368 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at 12 Hours Post-Dose in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) By Treatment
NCT01772368 (6) [back to overview]Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period
NCT01772368 (6) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) of Salmeterol
NCT01772368 (6) [back to overview]Time of Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Salmeterol
NCT01772368 (6) [back to overview]Standardized Baseline-Adjusted Area Under the Curve For Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second Over 12 Hours Post-dose (FEV1 AUC0-12)
NCT01791972 (3) [back to overview]Maximum Percentage Fall From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) up to 60 Minutes After the Exercise Challenge
NCT01791972 (3) [back to overview]Participants Whose Maximum Percentage Decrease From the Baseline Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Post-Exercise Challenge Was >20%
NCT01791972 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Whose Maximum Percentage Decrease From the Baseline Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Post-Exercise Challenge Was <10%
NCT01833026 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Accurate Classification of Irreversible Airflow Obstruction
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/L
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Annualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Annualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Annualized Event Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Annualized Event Rate of LOAC During The Treatment Period: ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Time to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Time to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: HEos-ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Time to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Time to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: HEos-ITT Population
NCT01854047 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population
NCT01857323 (6) [back to overview]Absolute Value of Total Discrepancy Size Per Inhaler
NCT01857323 (6) [back to overview]Dosing Discrepancies Per 200 Dose Cycles: Count Up Unknown Dose Cycle
NCT01857323 (6) [back to overview]Dosing Discrepancies Per 200 Dose Cycles: Dose Cycle Count Up
NCT01857323 (6) [back to overview]Dosing Discrepancies Per 200 Dose Cycles: Dose Cycle Not Count
NCT01857323 (6) [back to overview]Dosing Discrepancies Per 200 Dose Cycles: Count Unknown Dose Cycle
NCT01857323 (6) [back to overview]Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
NCT01880723 (5) [back to overview]Diffusion Capacity of the Lungs for Nitric Oxide
NCT01880723 (5) [back to overview]Exhaled Sodium (mmol/L)
NCT01880723 (5) [back to overview]Net Exhaled Chloride
NCT01880723 (5) [back to overview]Peripheral Oxygen Saturation
NCT01880723 (5) [back to overview]Diffusion Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide
NCT01885936 (3) [back to overview]Change in Forced Vital Capacity From Pulmonary Function Tests at 30 Weeks and 52 Weeks.
NCT01885936 (3) [back to overview]Change in 6 Minute Walk Test
NCT01885936 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events.
NCT01899144 (3) [back to overview]Baseline-Adjusted Area-Under-The-Percent-Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) Versus Time Curve Over 6 Hours Post-Dose
NCT01899144 (3) [back to overview]Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
NCT01899144 (3) [back to overview]Baseline-Adjusted Area-Under-The- Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) Versus Time Curve Over 6 Hours Post-Dose (FEV1 AUC0-6)
NCT01907334 (1) [back to overview]Total Airway Resistance Increase
NCT01922271 (7) [back to overview]Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) 15 Min Post Dose
NCT01922271 (7) [back to overview]Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve (AUC) 0-2
NCT01922271 (7) [back to overview]Total Lung Capacity (TLC)
NCT01922271 (7) [back to overview]Functional Resistance Capacity (FRCpleth)
NCT01922271 (7) [back to overview]Residual Volume (RV)
NCT01922271 (7) [back to overview]Specific Airway Resistance (sRAW)
NCT01922271 (7) [back to overview]Inspiratory Capacity (IC)
NCT01987219 (4) [back to overview]Change in Respiratory Function (Airway Resistance at 5 Hz) From Baseline
NCT01987219 (4) [back to overview]Change in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV) From Baseline
NCT01987219 (4) [back to overview]Change in Forced Expiratory Flow Between 25-75% (FEF25-75)
NCT01987219 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Forced Vital Capacity
NCT01997463 (1) [back to overview]The Primary Outcome Will be the Score on the Juniper Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)
NCT02031640 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12-week Treatment Period Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)
NCT02031640 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over Weeks 1-12 Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)
NCT02031640 (7) [back to overview]Standardized Baseline-adjusted Trough Morning Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time 0 to 12 Weeks (AUEC(0-12wk) )
NCT02031640 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Withdrawn From Study Due to Meeting Stopping Criteria for Worsening Asthma During the 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT02031640 (7) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Withdrawal From Study Treatment Due to Meeting Stopping Criteria for Worsening Asthma
NCT02031640 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Trough Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12-week Treatment Period Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)
NCT02031640 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol (Number of Inhalations) Over Weeks 1-12 Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)
NCT02040766 (6) [back to overview]Standardized Baseline-adjusted Trough Morning Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time 0 to 12 Weeks (AUEC(0-12wk))
NCT02040766 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Trough Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12-week Treatment Period
NCT02040766 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12-week Treatment Period
NCT02040766 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol (Number of Inhalations) Over Weeks 1-12
NCT02040766 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over Weeks 1-12
NCT02040766 (6) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates For Time to Withdrawal Due to Meeting Stopping Criteria for Worsening Asthma During the 12-week Treatment Period
NCT02040779 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT02040779 (10) [back to overview]Standardized Baseline-Adjusted Trough Morning Forced Expiratory Volume in One Minute (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time Zero to 12 Weeks (AUEC(0-12wk)) by Actual Treatment Received
NCT02040779 (10) [back to overview]Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormal Vital Sign Results During the Treatment Period
NCT02040779 (10) [back to overview]Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT02040779 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Total Daily Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol Over Weeks 1-12
NCT02040779 (10) [back to overview]Participants With Findings During Oropharyngeal Examination During Treatment
NCT02040779 (10) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Study Drug Treatment Withdrawal Due to Meeting Stopping Criteria for Worsening Asthma During the 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT02040779 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants Withdrawn From Study Due to Meeting Stopping Criteria for Worsening Asthma During the 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT02040779 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT02040779 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Trough Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Rate Over the 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT02073747 (1) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With a Change From Baseline Serum Lactate Following a One Hour Albuterol Nebulizer Treatment.
NCT02126839 (3) [back to overview]Summary of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT02126839 (3) [back to overview]Baseline Adjusted Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Area Under The Concentration Time Curve Up From Time Zero up to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) Over 3 Weeks
NCT02126839 (3) [back to overview]Baseline Adjusted Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under The Concentration Time Curve Up From Time Zero up to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) Over 3 Weeks
NCT02139644 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morning Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12
NCT02139644 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)) Score at Endpoint for Patients >=18 Years Old
NCT02139644 (9) [back to overview]Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period
NCT02139644 (9) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 1
NCT02139644 (9) [back to overview]Standardized Baseline-Adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Postdose (FEV1 AUEC0-12h) at Week 12
NCT02139644 (9) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Remaining in Study At Week 12
NCT02139644 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT02139644 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol Over the 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT02139644 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Morning Trough Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12 Week Treatment
NCT02141633 (2) [back to overview]Echocardiogram
NCT02141633 (2) [back to overview]Airway Blood Flow
NCT02141854 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Morning Trough Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12 Week Treatment
NCT02141854 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol Over the 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT02141854 (9) [back to overview]Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period
NCT02141854 (9) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 1
NCT02141854 (9) [back to overview]Standardized Baseline-Adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours PostDose (FEV1 AUEC0-12) at Week 12
NCT02141854 (9) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Remaining in Study At Week 12
NCT02141854 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT02141854 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morning Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12
NCT02141854 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)) Score at Endpoint for Patients >=18 Years Old
NCT02150499 (3) [back to overview]The Overall Safety of Treatment With Levalbuterol Tartrate HFA Inhalation Aerosol as Measured by the Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events.
NCT02150499 (3) [back to overview]The Overall Safety of Treatment With Levalbuterol Tartrate HFA Inhalation Aerosol as Measured by the Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation.
NCT02150499 (3) [back to overview]The Overall Safety of Treatment With Levalbuterol Tartrate HFA Inhalation Aerosol as Measured by the Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events.
NCT02170532 (2) [back to overview]Change in Maximum Forced Expiratory Volume at One Second (FEV1)
NCT02170532 (2) [back to overview]Change in 8 Hour Area-under-the-curve FEV1
NCT02175771 (6) [back to overview]Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period
NCT02175771 (6) [back to overview]Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs During the Treatment Period
NCT02175771 (6) [back to overview]Analysis of 24-Hour Urine Cortisol Free Over the 26-Week Treatment Period
NCT02175771 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Minute (FEV1) Over the 26-Week Treatment Period
NCT02175771 (6) [back to overview]Participants With Positive Swab Test Results for Oral Candidiasis
NCT02175771 (6) [back to overview]Shifts From Baseline to Endpoint in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
NCT02233803 (3) [back to overview]Change From BL in Asthma Control Test (ACT) at 4 Wks for Each TP
NCT02233803 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (BL) in Trough Morning Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Day (D)29
NCT02233803 (3) [back to overview]FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-10 h) at D1 of Each TP
NCT02257372 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) on Day 85
NCT02257372 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weighted Mean 0-6 Hour FEV1 Obtained Post-dose on Day 84
NCT02257385 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) on Treatment Day 85 (Visit 8)
NCT02257385 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weighted Mean (WM) FEV1 Over 0-6 Hour Post-dose at Day 84
NCT02275052 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) 3 Hours Post-dose at Week 12 of Each Treatment Period
NCT02275052 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Exercise Endurance Time (EET) Post-dose at Week 12 of Each Treatment Period
NCT02275052 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 12 of Each Treatment Period
NCT02275052 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Inspiratory Capacity (IC) 3 Hours Post-dose at Week 12 of Each Treatment Period
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Spirometry Parameters in Pre and Post Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1); Pre and Post Forced Vital Capacity (FVC); Pre and Post Forced Expiratory Volume in 6 Seconds (FEV6).
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total, SGRQ Symptoms Score, SGRQ Activity Score and SGRQ Impact Score Over Time
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Annual Rate of Moderate and Severe Exacerbations of COPD
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Liver Events During the Treatment Period
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants Having Any Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbation
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Absolute White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Total Neutrophil, Total Lymphocyte, Basophil, Eosinophil, Monocyte and Platelet Count at the Indicated Time Point
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Spirometry Parameters in Pre and Post FEV1/FVC, Percent Predicted (PP) FEV1, PP FEV6 and PP FVC
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Chloride, Calcium, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium and Blood Urea Nitrogen at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Eosinophil Percentage at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Frequency of Short Acting Beta-agonist or Anti-cholinergic Use
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Plasma Losmapimod Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to the End of Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau])
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin, Total Protein, Albumin and Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Uric Acid and Creatinine at the Indicated Time Point
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Plasma Losmapimod Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Lowest Concentration (Ctrough) at Steady State
NCT02299375 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate (HR) Values at the Indicated Time Points
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Mean Annual On-treatment Moderate and/or Severe COPD Exacerbations up to Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Mean Annual On-treatment Moderate and/or Severe COPD Exacerbations up to Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an On-treatment Penumonia Event in the Extension Part of the Study
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an On-treatment Penumonia Event in the Treatment Period
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Finding at Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least One On-treatment Bone Fracture Incident in the Extension Part of the Study
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least One On-treatment Bone Fracture Incident in the Treatment Period
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score Expressed as Least Square Mean at Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score Expressed as Least Square Mean at Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Assessment of Respiratory Symptoms by Change From Baseline in 4-weekly Mean Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT)-RS Scores up to Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Assessment of Respiratory Symptoms by Change From Baseline in 4-weekly Mean EXACT-RS Scores up to Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in QTcF and PR Interval at Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (BP) at Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (BP) at Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting an Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI) of Oropharyngeal Origin in the Treatment Period
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE) in the Treatment Period
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any On-treatment AE/SAEs in the Extension Part of the Study
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Cardiovascular (CV) Events (Including Supraventricular Arrhythmia and Non Fatal Myocardial Infarction) in the Treatment Period
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any On-treatment CV Events (Including Supraventricular Arrhythmia and Non Fatal Myocardial Infarction) in the Extension Part of the Study
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glucose, Calcium, Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, and Urea at Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting an AESI of Oropharyngeal Origin in the Extension Part of the Study
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Gamma Glutamyl Aminotransferase (GGT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), and Creatine Kinase at Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Daily Activity Question Percentage of Days Reporting a Score of 2 up to Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Correction (QTcF) and PR Interval at Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glucose, Calcium, CO2, Chloride, Magnesium, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, and Urea at Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes at Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes at Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Urate at Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Urate at Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, and Platelets at Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, and Platelets at Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in ALT, AST, GGT, ALP, and Creatine Kinase at Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Albumin and Protein at Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Albumin and Protein at Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Daily Activity Question Percentage of Days Reporting a Score of 2 up to Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate According to Bazett's Formula (QTcB) at Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in QTcB at Week 52
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD; SGRQ) Total Score for COPD Participants at Week 24
NCT02345161 (49) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire-COPD; SGRQ Total Score for COPD Participants at Week 52
NCT02371629 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Area Under The Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) for Different Time Spans Post Dosing at Week 12
NCT02371629 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12
NCT02371629 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Area Under The Curve (AUC 0-12 Hour) for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Post Dosing at Day 1
NCT02371629 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With a Clinically Significant Improvement in St George Respiratory Questionnaire at Week 12 and Week 26
NCT02371629 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With a Clinically Important Improvement on Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at Week 12 and Week 26
NCT02371629 (15) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death
NCT02371629 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Day 1 and Week 26
NCT02371629 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days With no Rescue Medication Use Over the 26 Weeks
NCT02371629 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at Week 12 and Week 26
NCT02371629 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Score at Week 12 and Week 26
NCT02371629 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Daily COPD Symptom Score at Week 26
NCT02371629 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Inspiratory Capacity (IC) at Individual Timepoints at Week 26
NCT02371629 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Individual Timepoints at Week 26
NCT02371629 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Individual Timepoints at Week 26
NCT02371629 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Area Under The Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) for Different Time Spans Post Dosing at Week 26
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ [S]) Self-Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil <0.3 Giga/L
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic Rhinitis
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Time to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic Rhinosinusitis
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/L
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events Resulting in Hospitalization or Emergency Room Visit During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Annualized Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) Event During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil <0.3 Giga/L
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Time to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/L
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/L
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self- Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self-Administered Global Score at Weeks 12, 36, and 52: ITT Population
NCT02414854 (39) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population
NCT02447250 (8) [back to overview]Etiology of Preterm Delivery
NCT02447250 (8) [back to overview]Maternal BMI at Time of Pregnancy and Likelihood of Positive Response to Albuterol
NCT02447250 (8) [back to overview]Birth Weight of Albuterol Responders vs Non Responders
NCT02447250 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Positive Response at Different Albuterol Doses
NCT02447250 (8) [back to overview]Association of Smoke Exposure During Pregnancy and Neonatal Response to Albuterol
NCT02447250 (8) [back to overview]Gestational Age at Birth
NCT02447250 (8) [back to overview]Change in Respiratory Resistance
NCT02447250 (8) [back to overview]Family History of Asthma and Likelihood to Respond to Albuterol
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Pre-specified Local Application Site Reactions
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Anaphylaxis and/or Systemic Allergic Reactions
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Average TCS During the Entire RS
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Average Rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) DSS During the Peak RS
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Average Rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) DMS During the Peak RS
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Peak Ragweed Season (RS)
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Treated With Epinephrine
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of Night-time Awakenings
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 Following Multiple Dose Administration by Assessment of AUC(0-24) of AZD7594
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline to Day 8 in Asthma Control Questionnaire-5
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 Following Multiple Dose Administration by Assessment of AUC(0-last) of AZD7594
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Asthma Control Questionnaire-5
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) on Day 8
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 Following Multiple Dose Administration by Assessment of Cmax/D of AZD7594
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) on Day 15
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (ePEF) Before Administration Over the Treatment Period
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Rescue Salbutamol Over the Treatment Period
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 Following Multiple Dose Administration by Assessment of Cmax,ss of AZD7594
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of Daily Symptom Score
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of Asthma Control Days
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 Following Multiple Dose Administration by Assessment of Cmin of AZD7594
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 Following Multiple Dose Administration by Assessment of Cavg,ss of AZD7594
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 Following Multiple Dose Administration by Assessment of Tmax,ss of AZD7594
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 Following Multiple Dose Administration by Assessment of AUC(0-24)/D of AZD7594
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 by Assessment of AUC(0-4) of AZD7594
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 by Assessment of Cmax of AZD7594
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 by Assessment of Tmax of AZD7594
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) on Day 8
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) on Day 15
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) on Day 8
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Morning Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) on Day 15
NCT02479412 (26) [back to overview]Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (mPEF) Before Administration Over the Treatment Period
NCT02483975 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 24-hour Urinary Cortisol Excretion at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42)
NCT02483975 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 0-24 Hour Weighted Mean Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (D 42) in Intention-to-treat (ITT) Population
NCT02483975 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 0-24 Hour Weighted Mean Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42) in SC Population
NCT02483975 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 24-hour 6-beta Hydroxycortisol Excretion at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42).
NCT02483975 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0-24 Hour Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42).
NCT02502734 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE).
NCT02502734 (2) [back to overview]Mean Growth Rate in Lower-leg Growth, as Determined by Knemometry.
NCT02513160 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Trough Morning Forced Expiratory Volume in One Minute (FEV1) Rate Over the 6-Week Treatment Period
NCT02513160 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 6-Week Treatment Period
NCT02513160 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Total Daily (24-Hour) Rescue Medication Use Over the 6-Week Treatment Period
NCT02513160 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Trough Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Rate Over the 6-Week Treatment Period
NCT02513160 (7) [back to overview]Count of Participants Withdrawn From Study Drug Treatment Due to Meeting Stopping Criteria for Worsening Asthma
NCT02513160 (7) [back to overview]Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
NCT02513160 (7) [back to overview]Standardized Baseline-Adjusted Trough Morning Forced Expiratory Volume in One Minute (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time Zero to 6 Weeks (AUEC(0-6wk))
NCT02528214 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Maximum Possible Reduction in Oral Corticosteroids Dose Per Protocol at Week 24 While Maintaining Asthma Control
NCT02528214 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who No Longer Required Oral Corticosteroids Dose at Week 24 While Maintaining Asthma Control
NCT02528214 (14) [back to overview]Percentage Reduction From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Dose at Week 24 While Maintaining Asthma Control
NCT02528214 (14) [back to overview]Supplementary Presentation of Primary Outcome Measure Data: Median Percentage Reduction From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroids Dose at Week 24 While Maintaining Asthma Control
NCT02528214 (14) [back to overview]Absolute Reduction From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroids Dose at Week 24 While Maintaining Asthma Control
NCT02528214 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-Question Version (ACQ-5) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
NCT02528214 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12 and Week 24
NCT02528214 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Week 12 and Week 24
NCT02528214 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 12 and 24
NCT02528214 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sino Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) Global Score at Week 12 and Week 24
NCT02528214 (14) [back to overview]Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 24-Week Treatment Period
NCT02528214 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving >= 50% Reduction in Oral Corticosteroids Dose at Week 24 While Maintaining Asthma Control
NCT02528214 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction in Oral Corticosteroids Dose to <5 mg/Day at Week 24 While Maintaining Asthma Control
NCT02528214 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Week 12 and Week 24
NCT02566902 (9) [back to overview]Change in PAS Score (Points on a Scale)
NCT02566902 (9) [back to overview]Change in PASS Score (Points on a Scale)
NCT02566902 (9) [back to overview]Change Respiratory Rate (Breaths Per Minute)
NCT02566902 (9) [back to overview]Emergency Department Length of Stay (Minutes)
NCT02566902 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Experiencing Medication Side Effects (%)
NCT02566902 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Requiring Inpatient Hospital Admission (% of Subjects)
NCT02566902 (9) [back to overview]Change in Heart Rate (Beats Per Minute)
NCT02566902 (9) [back to overview]Total Quantity of Albuterol Given in the Emergency Department (mg)
NCT02566902 (9) [back to overview]Change in FEV1 (% Predicted)
NCT02573870 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose Weighted Mean Heart Rate at Day 42, Derived From Electrocardiograms (ECGs)
NCT02584257 (1) [back to overview]Post-dose PC20 Concentration After Receiving Differing Doses of Test, Reference, or Placebo
NCT02654145 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) Score at Week 32
NCT02654145 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Score at Week 32
NCT02654145 (4) [back to overview]Ratio to Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Count at Week 32
NCT02654145 (4) [back to overview]The Rate of Clinically Significant Asthma Exacerbations Over 32 Weeks' Treatment
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell Count at Week 6
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 6
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 4
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 2
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at Week 4
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at Week 6
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Average Change From Baseline in Pre-dose FEV1 at Week 4 and Week 6
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Baseline Pre-dose Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Days With Worsening Asthma Average Over Weeks 3 to 6
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (%) at Week 6
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at Week 2
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Platelet Count at Week 6
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Neutrophil (%) at Week 6
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 6
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 4
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 2
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 4
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 2
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Eosinophil (Percent [%]) at Week 6
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 6
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bilirubin at Week 6
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Week 6
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) at Week 6
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) at Week 6
NCT02720081 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT02729051 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SGRQ Total Score at Week 24
NCT02729051 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 24
NCT02729051 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders Based on the Saint (St) George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 24
NCT02729051 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders Based on Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at Week 24
NCT02729051 (6) [back to overview]TDI Focal Score at Week 24
NCT02729051 (6) [back to overview]Time to First Moderate or Severe Exacerbation
NCT02740660 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT02740660 (4) [back to overview]Change in Lean Mass With Caffeine/Albuterol
NCT02740660 (4) [back to overview]Change in Fat Mass With Caffeine/Albuterol
NCT02740660 (4) [back to overview]Change in Weight With Caffeine/Albuterol
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morning (AM) Post-Dose % Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) in the Area Under the Curve (AUC)0-60
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM Pre-Dose % Predicted FEV1 With MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID or MF MDI 100 mcg BID Over the First 12 Weeks of Treatment
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline AM Post-Dose Percent Predicted FEV1 on Day 1 of Treatment
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline AM Post-Dose % Predicted FEV1 AUC 0-4 Hours on Day 1 and Week 12 of Treatment
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Mometsone Furoate
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Participants Whose SABA Rescue Medication Use Increased Across Weeks 1-12 of the Treatment Period
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Mometsone Furoate
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Total Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA) Rescue Medication With MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID or MF MDI 100 mcg BID Over the First 12 Weeks of Treatment
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Count (Percentage) of Participants Experiencing At Least One Adverse Event (AE)
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Count (Percentage) of Participants Discontinuing From Study Medication Due to An AE
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve of Mometasone Furoate From Time 0 to Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last)
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve of Mometasone Furoate From Time 0 to 12 Hours (AUC0-12)
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Participants Using SABA Rescue Medication Across Weeks 1-12 of the Treatment Period
NCT02766673 (2) [back to overview]Change in Expiratory Flow Between Pre and Post-medication Dosing
NCT02766673 (2) [back to overview]Percent Change in Heart Rate (Beats/Min) Between Pre and Post-medication Dosing
NCT02799784 (1) [back to overview]Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 8
NCT02802111 (2) [back to overview]Oxygen Consumption
NCT02802111 (2) [back to overview]Heart Rate
NCT02885636 (14) [back to overview]Change in Resting Cardiac Output
NCT02885636 (14) [back to overview]Change in 20 Watt Exercise Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)
NCT02885636 (14) [back to overview]Change in Exercise Cardiac Output
NCT02885636 (14) [back to overview]Change in Exercise Pulmonary Artery Compliance
NCT02885636 (14) [back to overview]Change in Exercise Pulmonary Artery Pressure
NCT02885636 (14) [back to overview]Change in Exercise Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP)
NCT02885636 (14) [back to overview]Change in Exercise Pulmonary Elastance
NCT02885636 (14) [back to overview]Change in Exercise Right Atrial Pressure (RA)
NCT02885636 (14) [back to overview]Change in Resting Pulmonary Artery Compliance
NCT02885636 (14) [back to overview]Change in Resting Pulmonary Artery Pressure
NCT02885636 (14) [back to overview]Change in Resting Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP)
NCT02885636 (14) [back to overview]Change in Resting Pulmonary Elastance
NCT02885636 (14) [back to overview]Change in Resting Pulmonary Vascular Resistance
NCT02885636 (14) [back to overview]Change in Resting Right Atrial Pressure (RA)
NCT02924688 (12) [back to overview]Annualized Rate of Moderate and Severe Asthma Exacerbations
NCT02924688 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
NCT02924688 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 (ACQ-7) Total Score at Week 24
NCT02924688 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Common (>=3%) Non-SAE
NCT02924688 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology Values
NCT02924688 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Chemistry Values
NCT02924688 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic FEV1 at 3 Hours Post Study Treatment at Week 24
NCT02924688 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS) Total Score Over Weeks 21 to 24 (Inclusive) of the Treatment Period
NCT02924688 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 24
NCT02924688 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 24
NCT02924688 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 24
NCT02924688 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 24
NCT02969408 (5) [back to overview]Number of Albuterol Uses in the 24 Hours Preceding a Severe CAE
NCT02969408 (5) [back to overview]Clinical Asthma Exacerbation (CAE) Rate: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least 1 Moderate or Severe CAE
NCT02969408 (5) [back to overview]Number of Days Prior to the Peak of a Severe CAE When Albuterol Use Increased
NCT02969408 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02969408 (5) [back to overview]Total Number of Inhalations in the Days Preceding the Peak of a Severe CAE
NCT03012061 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With On-treatment Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) Findings
NCT03012061 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With On-treatment Adverse Events (AE), Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAE)
NCT03012061 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic FEV1 at 3 Hours Post Dose at Week 24
NCT03012061 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 24
NCT03012061 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in On-treatment Pulse Rate
NCT03012061 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in On-treatment Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
NCT03137303 (1) [back to overview]Total Number of Healthcare Visits
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Eosinophils/Leukocytes
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Calcium, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Urea
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Urinalysis Results Relative to Baseline
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Albumin, Protein
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Lymphocytes/Leukocytes
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Monocytes/Leukocytes
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Neutrophils/Leukocytes
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Platelet Count
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PR Interval and QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate According to Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Basophils/Leukocytes
NCT03184987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes
NCT03256695 (5) [back to overview]Number of Albuterol Uses in the 24 Hours Preceding a CE-COPD
NCT03256695 (5) [back to overview]Number of Days Prior to the Symptom Peak of a CE-COPD Event When Albuterol Use Increased
NCT03256695 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT03256695 (5) [back to overview]Total Number of Albuterol Inhalations in the Days Preceding the Symptom Peak of a CE-COPD Event
NCT03256695 (5) [back to overview]Clinical Exacerbation of COPD (CE-COPD) Rate: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least 1 Moderate or Severe CE-COPD
NCT03270332 (2) [back to overview]Change in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)
NCT03270332 (2) [back to overview]Change in Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure (MPAP)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Presence of Ketones, Glucose, Occult Blood, and Protein
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Ratio to Baseline in Absolute Blood Eosinophil Count
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Ratio to Baseline in Absolute Blood Eosinophil Count
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Ratio to Baseline in Absolute Blood Eosinophil Count
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Ratio to Baseline in Absolute Blood Eosinophil Count
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Urine Potential of Hydrogen (pH) Analysis by Dipstick Method
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Urine Potential of Hydrogen (pH) Analysis by Dipstick Method
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Urine Potential of Hydrogen (pH) Analysis by Dipstick Method
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Urine Potential of Hydrogen (pH) Analysis by Dipstick Method
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Urine Potential of Hydrogen (pH) Analysis by Dipstick Method
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Urine Potential of Hydrogen (pH) Analysis by Dipstick Method
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Urine Specific Gravity Analysis by Dipstick Method
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PR Interval, QRS Interval, QT Interval and QT Interval Corrected by Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Interval
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PR Interval, QRS Interval, QT Interval and QT Interval Corrected by Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Interval
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PR Interval, QRS Interval, QT Interval and QT Interval Corrected by Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Interval
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Urine Specific Gravity Analysis by Dipstick Method
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Urine Specific Gravity Analysis by Dipstick Method
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Monocyte, Eosinophil, Basophil and Platelet Count
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Monocyte, Eosinophil, Basophil and Platelet Count
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Urine Specific Gravity Analysis by Dipstick Method
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Urine Specific Gravity Analysis by Dipstick Method
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Urine Specific Gravity Analysis by Dipstick Method
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Monocyte, Eosinophil, Basophil and Platelet Count
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Presence of Ketones, Glucose, Occult Blood, and Protein
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematocrit
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematocrit
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematocrit
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematocrit
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate: Electrocardiogram (ECG)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]AUC(0-t) of GSK3511294 300 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]CL/F of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]CL/F of GSK3511294 300 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Monocyte, Eosinophil, Basophil and Platelet Count
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Cmax of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Cmax of GSK3511294 300 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Lambda_z of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Lambda_z of GSK3511294 300 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Percentage of AUC (0-inf) Obtained by Extrapolation (%AUCex) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]T1/2 of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Like Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Total Protein and Albumin
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Total Protein and Albumin
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]AUC(0-inf) of GSK3511294 300 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]AUC(0-inf) of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC[0-t]) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-inf]) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]T1/2 of GSK3511294 300 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Terminal Phase Elimination Rate Constant (Lambda_z) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Terminal Phase Half-life (t1/2) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (Tlast) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Titers of Binding ADA to GSK3511294
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Tlast of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Tlast of GSK3511294 300 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Tmax of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Tmax of GSK3511294 300 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Vd/F of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Vd/F of GSK3511294 300 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Absolute Values of Complement (C)3 and C4
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Absolute Values of Complement (C)3 and C4
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Absolute Values of Complement (C)3 and C4
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Absolute Values of Complement (C)3 and C4
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter Like Glucose, Calcium, Potassium, Sodium, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), and Magnesium
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter Like Glucose, Calcium, Potassium, Sodium, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), and Magnesium
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter Like Glucose, Calcium, Potassium, Sodium, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), and Magnesium
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter Like Glucose, Calcium, Potassium, Sodium, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), and Magnesium
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Total Protein and Albumin
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Total Protein and Albumin
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Like Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Like Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Like Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Like Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin and Creatinine
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Like Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin and Creatinine
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Like Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin and Creatinine
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Like Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin and Creatinine
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Presence of Ketones, Glucose, Occult Blood, and Protein
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Week 4 (AUC[0-Week 4]) of GSK3511294
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Week 26 (AUC [0-Week 26]) of GSK3511294
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Week 12 (AUC[0-Week 12]) of GSK3511294
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate: Electrocardiogram (ECG)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate: Electrocardiogram (ECG)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Apparent Volume of Distribution After Subcutaneous Administration (Vd/F) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Apparent Clearance Following Subcutaneous Dosing (CL/F) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]%AUCex of GSK3511294 300 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]%AUCex of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate: Electrocardiogram (ECG)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Presence of Ketones, Glucose, Occult Blood, and Protein
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]AUC(0-t) of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PR Interval, QRS Interval, QT Interval and QT Interval Corrected by Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Interval
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count (RBC)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count (RBC)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count (RBC)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count (RBC)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Respiration Rate
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Respiration Rate
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Respiration Rate
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Respiration Rate
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Temperature
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Temperature
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Temperature
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Temperature
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAE)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Binding to GSK3511294
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Presence of Ketones, Glucose, Occult Blood, and Protein
NCT03287310 (131) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Presence of Ketones, Glucose, Occult Blood, and Protein
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Time to Next Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Following Index Exacerbation
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting COPD Exacerbations
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Nemiralisib
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]AUC From Time Zero to Time 't' [AUC(0-t)] of Nemiralisib
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to 24 Hours [AUC(0-24)] of Nemiralisib
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Day 84 Measured Post Bronchodilator
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Nemiralisib
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders Using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) on Treatment Days 28, 56, and 84, and Following EXACT Defined Recovery From the Index Exacerbation
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders on the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score as Measured by the SGRQ for COPD Participants (SGRQ-C) at Days 28, 56, and 84
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Percentage of Rescue-free Days
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving the Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT) Definition of Recovery From the Index Exacerbation
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Hematology Values
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Pulse Rate
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Clinical Chemistry Values
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs), SAEs and AE of Special Interest (AESI)
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Mean Severity of Subsequent Health Care Resource Use (HCRU) Exacerbations Defined by EXACT
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Mean Number of Occasions of Rescue Medication Use Per Day
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Change From Hospital Discharge in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 Measured Pre and Post-bronchodilator
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Change From Hospital Discharge in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 Measured Pre and Post-bronchodilator
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SGRQ Total Score at Days 28, 56 and 84
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 Measured Pre and Post-bronchodilator
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 Measured Pre and Post-bronchodilator
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CAT Total Score
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of Nemiralisib
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Rate of Moderate and Severe Exacerbations Over 12-week Treatment Period
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Plasma Drug Concentration at Pre-dose (Ctrough) of Nemiralisib
NCT03345407 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Time to Recovery From Index Exacerbation Using EXACT- PRO Tool
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Number of Secondary Care Visits for Asthma Conditions or COPD
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Received Short-acting Beta-agonist Therapy
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score-asthma Cohort Only
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Median Rescue Medication Use
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]PROactive Difficulty Domain Score
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]PROactive Amount Domain Score
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Maintenance Compliance
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Active Total Score
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score-COPD Cohort Only
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Number of Primary Care Visits for Asthma Conditions or COPD
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With New Prescriptions
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Number of All Primary Care Visits
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Number of All Secondary Care Visits
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS) in COPD Total Score-COPD Cohort Only
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Median Daily Activity Level Based on Vector Magnitude Counts.
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Median Number of Steps Per Day
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT) Event Rate-COPD Cohort Only
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Number of Days in Hospital for Asthma and COPD
NCT03357341 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Completed Exit Interview
NCT03364608 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC0-4
NCT03364608 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC0-6
NCT03364608 (3) [back to overview]Peak Change From Baseline in FEV1
NCT03371459 (2) [back to overview]Baseline-adjusted FEV1 AUC0-6 After the Last Cumulative Dose
NCT03371459 (2) [back to overview]Baseline-adjusted FEV1 30 Minutes After Each Cumulative Dose
NCT03380429 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Test (ACT) Total Score
NCT03380429 (10) [back to overview]Number of Doses of Rescue Medication Use Between Month 4 and Month 6 as Determined by the Rescue Medication Sensor
NCT03380429 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of ELLIPTA Doses Taken (Daily Adherence) Between Month 1 and Month 3 as Determined by the Maintenance Sensor
NCT03380429 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of ELLIPTA Doses Taken (Daily Adherence) Between Month 1 and Month 6 as Determined by the Maintenance Sensor
NCT03380429 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of ELLIPTA Doses Taken (Daily Adherence) Between Month 4 and Month 6 as Determined by the Maintenance Sensor
NCT03380429 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Attaining Asthma Control (Percentage of Participants With an ACT Total Score >=20) at Month 6
NCT03380429 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Have Either an ACT Total Score of >=20 and/or an Increase From Baseline >=3 in ACT Total Score at Month 6
NCT03380429 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With an Increase From Baseline >=3 in ACT Total Score at Month 6
NCT03380429 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Rescue Free Days Between Month 4 and Month 6 as Determined by the Rescue Medication Sensor
NCT03380429 (10) [back to overview]"Percentage of ELLIPTA Doses Taken (Daily Adherence) Between Month 4 and Month 6 as Determined by the Maintenance Sensor for Arms; (Cohort 1: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Participant and HCP andCohort 5: no Data Supplied to Participant or HCP)"
NCT03474081 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate
NCT03474081 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 on Day 28
NCT03474081 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 on Day 84
NCT03474081 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) on Day 85
NCT03474081 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
NCT03474081 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT03478683 (4) [back to overview]Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours at Week 12 for ITT Population
NCT03478683 (4) [back to overview]Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 0-24 Hours at Week 12 for Modified Per Protocol (mPP) Population
NCT03478683 (4) [back to overview]Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours on Day 1
NCT03478683 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 on Day 2, Day 28, Day 84 and Day 85
NCT03478696 (4) [back to overview]Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 0-24 Hours at Week 12 for Modified Per Protocol (mPP) Population
NCT03478696 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 on Day 2, Day 28, Day 84 and Day 85
NCT03478696 (4) [back to overview]Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours at Week 12 for ITT Population
NCT03478696 (4) [back to overview]Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours on Day 1
NCT03528577 (1) [back to overview]Pharmacodynamic Endpoint Post-dose PC20
NCT03586544 (1) [back to overview]Maximum % Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1)
NCT03769090 (5) [back to overview]Total Annualized Dose of Systemic Corticosteroid (SCS)
NCT03769090 (5) [back to overview]Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for Participants Aged 12 Years and Older (AQLQ+12) - Number of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 24
NCT03769090 (5) [back to overview]Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) - Number of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 24
NCT03769090 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Severe Asthma Exacerbation Event
NCT03769090 (5) [back to overview]Annualized Severe Exacerbation Rate
NCT03847896 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Concentration Curve From 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6 Hours) Over 12 Weeks
NCT03847896 (6) [back to overview]Time to 15% Increase in FEV1 Over the Pre-treatment Value on Day 1
NCT03847896 (6) [back to overview]Duration of 15% Increase in FEV1 Over the Pre-treatment Value on Day 1
NCT03847896 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1
NCT03847896 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 at Week 1.
NCT03847896 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Difference on the Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) at Week 12.
NCT03890666 (10) [back to overview]System Usability Scale (SUS) Overall Score
NCT03890666 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) Illness Comprehensibility Subscale Score at Week 12
NCT03890666 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Weekly Short-acting Beta2 Agonist (SABA) Usage at Week 12 for the DS Group
NCT03890666 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Number of SABA-free Days at Week 12 for the DS Group
NCT03890666 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Meaningful Asthma Improvement at the End of 12-Week Treatment Period
NCT03890666 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT03890666 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in BMQ Necessity Subscale Score at Week 12
NCT03890666 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in BIPQ Emotional Representations Subscale Score at Week 12
NCT03890666 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in BIPQ Cognitive Subscale Score at Week 12
NCT03890666 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) Concern Subscale Score at Week 12
NCT04207840 (6) [back to overview]t[1/2], Terminal Elimination Half-life of Albuterol or Epinephrine
NCT04207840 (6) [back to overview]C[Max], Maximum Plasma Concentration of Albuterol or Epinephrine
NCT04207840 (6) [back to overview]AUC(0-tm)_TOT, Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total (Exogenous and Endogenous, if Available) Active Product Ingredient (API) From Time 0 to Time (tm)
NCT04207840 (6) [back to overview]AUC(0-tm)_DE, Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Exogenous Active Product Ingredient (API) From Time 0 to Time (tm)
NCT04207840 (6) [back to overview]AUC(0-inf), Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Albuterol or Epinephrine From Time 0 to Infinity
NCT04207840 (6) [back to overview]t[Max], Time at Which Maximum Plasma Concentration of Albuterol or Epinephrine is Observed
NCT04234464 (2) [back to overview]Maximum Percentage Fall From Post-dose, Pre-exercise Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV₁) Observed up to 60 Minutes Post-exercise Challenge
NCT04234464 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With a Maximum Percentage Fall in FEV₁ Post-exercise Challenge of <10%
NCT04606394 (3) [back to overview]DPI Responder Analysis in Patients With Suboptimal PIF (<60 L/Min)
NCT04606394 (3) [back to overview]DPI Responder Analysis in Patients With Reduced PIF (<45 L/Min)
NCT04606394 (3) [back to overview]PIF Measurement Techniques
NCT04677959 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Number of SABA-free Days at Week 24 for the DS Group
NCT04677959 (13) [back to overview]Number of Decreased Doses of Inhaled Medication
NCT04677959 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Well-Controlled Asthma or Reaching Clinically Important Improvement in Asthma Control
NCT04677959 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT04677959 (13) [back to overview]System Usability Scale (SUS) Overall Score for DS Group
NCT04677959 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) Concern Subscale Score at Week 24
NCT04677959 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Weekly SABA Usage at Week 24 for the DS Group
NCT04677959 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Adherence to Maintenance Treatment (FS eMDPI) at Week 24 for the DS Group
NCT04677959 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Asthma Questionnaire Score at Week 24
NCT04677959 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in BIPQ Cognitive Subscale Score at Week 24
NCT04677959 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in BMQ Necessity Subscale Score at Week 24
NCT04677959 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) Illness Comprehensibility Subscale Score at Week 24
NCT04677959 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in BIPQ Emotional Representations Subscale Score at Week 24
NCT04803734 (7) [back to overview]Tmax
NCT04803734 (7) [back to overview]T1/2
NCT04803734 (7) [back to overview]MRT
NCT04803734 (7) [back to overview]AUC(0-inf)
NCT04803734 (7) [back to overview]AUC(0-t)
NCT04803734 (7) [back to overview]Cmax
NCT04803734 (7) [back to overview]Kel(λ)
NCT05300087 (7) [back to overview]Tmax
NCT05300087 (7) [back to overview]AUC(0-inf)
NCT05300087 (7) [back to overview]MRT
NCT05300087 (7) [back to overview]Kel(λ)
NCT05300087 (7) [back to overview]Cmax
NCT05300087 (7) [back to overview]AUC(0-t)
NCT05300087 (7) [back to overview]T1/2

Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Auscultation/Wheezing Assessment

Wheezing was assessed by the investigator or designee based upon pulmonary auscultation (listening with a stethoscope) and reported in the case report form as present or absent. The count of wheezing presence (yes, no) at visits was summarized. (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15 and Day 29

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Present at BaselineAbsent at BaselinePresent on Day 15Absent on Day 15Present on Day 29Absent on Day 29
Mometasone111018941098
Placebo966468371

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Chest Tightness Symptom Score

Chest tightness is an asthma symptom assessed by participants using diary cards to record morning and evening chest tightness (recorded twice daily). Every morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her chest tightness for the time period since the last evaluation (or for the previous 12 hours for the first evaluation). The severity of chest tightness was rated on a 4-point scale (0=no symptom [best score] to 3=symptoms were hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone1.6-0.2-0.3-0.5-0.5-0.41.6-0.3-0.4-0.6-0.6-0.6
Placebo1.6-0.4-0.4-0.7-0.7-0.61.6-0.5-0.5-0.7-0.7-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Cough Symptom Score

Cough is an asthma symptom assessed by participants who used diary cards to record morning and evening cough (recorded twice daily). Every morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her coughing for the time period since the last evaluation (or for the previous 12 hours for the first evaluation). Cough was rated on a 4-point scale (0=no symptoms [best score] to 3=symptoms were hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]). Reduction in score indicated an improvement in cough symptoms. The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone1.7-0.3-0.4-0.7-0.7-0.61.7-0.4-0.5-0.7-0.7-0.6
Placebo1.5-0.3-0.4-0.4-0.5-0.51.5-0.4-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Difficulty Breathing Symptom Score

Difficulty breathing is an asthma symptom assessed by participants using diary cards to record morning and evening difficulty breathing (recorded twice daily). Every morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her difficulty breathing for the time period since the last evaluation (or for the previous 12 hours for the first evaluation). Difficulty breathing was rated on a 4-point scale (0=no symptom [best score] to 3=symptoms were hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone1.7-0.3-0.4-0.7-0.7-0.61.7-0.3-0.4-0.6-0.7-0.6
Placebo1.6-0.3-0.4-0.6-0.7-0.61.6-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.7-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Nasal Congestion Symptom Score

Nasal congestion is a symptom of SAR assessed by participants using diary cards to record morning and evening nasal congestion (recorded twice daily). Every morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her nasal congestion for the time period since the last evaluation (or for the previous 12 hours for the first evaluation). It was assessed on a 4-point scale (0=no symptom [best score] to 3=symptoms were hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone2.3-0.4-0.5-0.7-0.8-0.82.2-0.4-0.6-0.8-0.9-0.8
Placebo2.3-0.3-0.4-0.5-0.7-0.62.2-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.8-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Nasal Itching Symptom Score

Nasal itching is a symptom of SAR assessed by participants using diary cards to record morning and evening nasal itching (recorded twice daily). Every morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her nasal itching for the time period since the last evaluation (or for the previous 12 hours for the first evaluation). It was assessed on a 4-point scale (0=no symptom [best score] to 3=symptoms were hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone2.0-0.4-0.6-0.9-0.9-0.81.7-0.4-0.7-0.9-0.9-0.8
Placebo1.9-0.2-0.3-0.5-0.6-0.51.5-0.3-0.4-0.6-0.7-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Nasal Sneezing Symptom Score

Nasal sneezing is a symptom of SAR assessed by participants using diary cards to record morning and evening nasal sneezing (recorded twice daily). Every morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her nasal sneezing for the time period since the last evaluation (or for the previous 12 hours for the first evaluation). It was assessed on a 4-point scale (0=no symptom [best score] to 3=symptoms a were hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone1.8-0.5-0.6-0.9-0.9-0.81.9-0.5-0.7-0.9-0.9-0.9
Placebo1.7-0.2-0.6-0.4-0.6-0.61.8-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.7-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)

Participants used a peak flow meter to measure the rate of air forcibly expelled from the lungs. They performed triplicate PEFR measurements in the morning prior to taking their study medication and again in the evening, and documented the highest of the three values in their diaries. A day with worsening asthma was any day during which a decrease from baseline in morning (AM) PEFR of more than 25% occurred. The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionLiters/min (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone382.50.94.37.77.85.7394.40.54.95.86.95.6
Placebo362.31.04.11.03.34.6373.44.37.08.710.310.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Rhinorrhea Symptom Score

Rhinorrhea is a symptom of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) assessed by participants using diary cards to record morning and evening rhinorrhea (recorded twice daily). Every morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her rhinorrhea for the time period since the last evaluation (or for the previous 12 hours for the first evaluation). Rhinorrhea was assessed on a 4-point scale (0=no symptom [best score] to 3=symptoms were hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone2.2-0.3-0.5-0.7-0.9-0.82.1-0.4-0.5-0.8-0.9-0.8
Placebo2.1-0.2-0.3-0.4-0.5-0.52.0-0.3-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Total Nasal Symptom Severity (TNSS)

The Total Nasal Symptom Severity (TNSS) is the sum of severity scores for 4 nasal symptoms: nasal rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness/congestion, sneezing, and nasal itching as assessed in the participant diaries. The severity of each nasal symptom was rated on a 4-point scale (0=no symptom [best score] to 3=symptoms were hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]); minimum TNSS=0; maximum TNSS=12. A decrease in TNSS indicated an improvement in nasal symptoms. The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Week 1 (AM)Week 2 (AM)Week 3 (AM)Week 4 (AM)Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Week 1 (PM)Week 2 (PM)Week 3 (PM)Week 4 (PM)Final Week (PM)
Mometasone8.4-1.7-2.3-3.2-3.5-3.18.2-1.8-2.6-3.4-3.6-3.3
Placebo7.9-0.9-1.3-1.8-2.4-2.27.9-1.5-1.8-2.4-2.8-2.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Wheeze Symptom Score

Wheezing is a symptom of asthma. The wheezing assessment was based on participant diary data only. Every morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her wheezing for the time period since the last evaluation (or for the previous 12 hours for the first evaluation). Wheeze severity was rated on a 4-point scale (0=no wheezing [best score] to 3=wheezing was hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone1.5-0.2-0.4-0.6-0.6-0.51.5-0.3-0.4-0.6-0.7-0.6
Placebo1.3-0.3-0.3-0.5-0.6-0.51.3-0.4-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) Between 25% and 75% of the Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%)

Measured by the investigator (or a designated assistant) using a spirometer, FEF25%-75% is the average forcibly expelled air flow rate, measured between 75% and 25% of FVC. (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15 and Day 29

,
InterventionLiters/sec (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange at Day 15Change at Day 29
Mometasone2.980.120.15
Placebo3.000.000.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

Measured by the investigator (or a designated assistant) using a spirometer, FEV1 is the volume of air forcibly expelled from the lungs in one second. (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15 and Day 29

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange at Day 15Change at Day 29
Mometasone2.980.050.04
Placebo3.000.070.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

Measured by the investigator (or a designated assistant) using a spirometer, FVC is the total volume of air forcibly expelled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15 and Day 29

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange at Day 15Change at Day 29
Mometasone3.750.02-0.00
Placebo3.800.000.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Total Asthma Symptom Severity (TASS)

Each morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her asthma symptoms. The TASS was the sum of severity scores for 4 asthma symptoms: cough, wheeze, difficulty of breathing, and chest tightness. The severity of each asthma symptom was rated on a 4-point scale (0=no symptom; 3=severe); minimum TASS=0; maximum TASS=12. A decrease in TASS indicated an improvement in asthma symptoms. The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone6.5-0.9-1.5-2.4-2.5-2.26.6-1.4-1.7-2.6-2.7-2.4
Placebo5.9-1.4-1.5-2.1-2.6-2.26.0-1.7-1.7-2.3-2.5-2.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average Number of Puffs of Albuterol/Salbutamol Used

Once daily, participants recorded in their diaries the total number of puffs of albuterol/salbutamol used in each 24-hour period. The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionNumber of puffs (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 1Change at Week 2Change at Week 3Change at Week 4Change at Final Week
Mometasone2.4-0.4-0.6-0.8-0.7-0.7
Placebo2.1-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.6-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Interference With Daily Activities

Interference with daily activities was rated once each evening using a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (substantially interfered with activities or not able to perform the activities at all). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 1Change at Week 2Change at Week 3Change at Week 4Change at Final Week
Mometasone1.5-0.3-0.4-0.6-0.6-0.5
Placebo1.4-0.4-0.3-0.4-0.5-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Interference With Sleep

Interference with sleep was rated once each morning using a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (substantially interferes with sleep). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 1Change at Week 2Change at Week 3Change at Week 4Change at Final Week
Mometasone1.3-0.2-0.4-0.5-0.5-0.4
Placebo1.2-0.2-0.3-0.4-0.5-0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Nighttime Awakenings Due to Asthma

Participants recorded the number of times during the night they awakened due to asthma. The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionAwakenings (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 1Change at Week 2Change at Week 3Change at Week 4Change at Final Week
Mometasone0.6-0.1-0.1-0.3-0.2-0.2
Placebo0.6-0.2-0.2-0.3-0.3-0.3

[back to top]

Therapeutic Response to Asthma Symptoms

On Day 15 and Day 29, the investigator or designee and participant jointly assessed the participant's response to study intervention by comparing the current level of asthma symptoms with those noted on Day 1. Therapeutic response for asthma symptoms was based on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (Complete Relief) to 5 (No Relief). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 29

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Asthma: Day 15Asthma: Day 29
Mometasone3.43.2
Placebo3.43.5

[back to top]

Therapeutic Response to SAR Nasal Symptoms

On Day 15 and Day 29, the investigator or designee and participant jointly assessed the participant's response to study intervention by comparing the current level of SAR symptoms with those noted on Day 1. Therapeutic response for SAR symptoms was based on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (Complete Relief) to 5 (No Relief). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 29

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
SAR Nasal: Day 15SAR Nasal: Day 29
Mometasone3.23.0
Placebo3.43.4

[back to top]

Duration of Continuous Therapy

standard intention to treat (ITT) analysis (NCT00124176)
Timeframe: During hospitalization

InterventionHours (Median)
Continuous Levalbuterol (R) Nebulized Solution18.3
Continuous Racemic (R+S) Albuterol16

[back to top]

Change in Pediatric Asthma Severity Score

"Change in Pediatric Asthma Severity Score. Range 0 (best) - 6 (worst)~Score at each time point is calculated by adding 3 elements:~Wheeze (0= None/Mild, 1=Moderate, 2=Severe) Prolonged expiration (0= None/Mild, 1=Moderate, 2=Severe) Work of breathing (0= None/Mild, 1=Moderate, 2=Severe)" (NCT00124176)
Timeframe: After 12 hours of continuous nebulization

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Continuous Levalbuterol (R) Nebulized Solution-1.0
Continuous Racemic (R+S) Albuterol-0.64

[back to top]

Serum Potassium Levels

(NCT00124176)
Timeframe: After 12 hours of continuous nebulization

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Continuous Levalbuterol (R) Nebulized Solution3.6
Continuous Racemic (R+S) Albuterol3.6

[back to top]

Serum Albuterol S Isomer Levels

(NCT00124176)
Timeframe: After 6 hours of continuous albuterol

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Continuous Levalbuterol (R) Nebulized Solution5.5
Continuous Racemic (R+S) Albuterol28.6

[back to top]

Heart Rate

(NCT00124176)
Timeframe: After 12 hours of continuous nebulization

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Continuous Levalbuterol (R) Nebulized Solution132
Continuous Racemic (R+S) Albuterol132

[back to top]

Wheezing/Asthma/Bronchospasm Relapse Rate

This was defined as the percentage of subjects in each group (treatment with budesonide versus usual care) having an unscheduled acute visit to primary care, urgent care or an emergency department during the study period. (NCT00189436)
Timeframe: 3 weeks

Interventionpercentage of cases of asthma relapse (Number)
Treatment With Budesonide8.7
Usual Care4.0

[back to top]

Urinary Cortisol Levels

This was defined as the mean +/- standard deviation of 12 hour urinary cortisol levels in each group (treatment with budesonide versus usual care). (NCT00189436)
Timeframe: 3 weeks

Interventionng cortisol/mg creatinine (Mean)
Treatment With Budesonide95.4
Usual Care141.6

[back to top]

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

This was defined as the mean +/- standard deviation of FEV1 in each group (treatment with budesonide versus usual care. (NCT00189436)
Timeframe: 3 weeks

Intervention% Predicted (Mean)
Treatment With Budesonide86.2
Usual Care85.7

[back to top]

Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Observed up to 2 Hours Following Completion of Dosing (FEV1max%0-2) at Day 22

The baseline FEV1 was defined as the average of the two predose measurements ( at -0.5 and 0.0 hour) on the test day (Day 22). The mean was obtained from the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for baseline FEV1 and the pooled investigational center. (NCT00308685)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose at Day 22), 2 hours postdose at Day 22

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Albuterol-HFA-BAI13.807
Placebo-HFA-BAI8.644

[back to top]

Baseline-Adjusted Area Under the Percent-Predicted FEV1 Versus Time Curve Over 6 Hours (PPFEV1 AUEC0-6) at Day 22

Baseline-adjusted PPFEV1 AUEC0-6 on Study Day 22 was determined using both the Day 1 and Day 22 baselines. (NCT00308685)
Timeframe: Predose (30 and 5 minutes) and 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 240, and 360 minutes postdose at Day 22

,
Interventionpercentage of predicted FEV1*hour (Mean)
PPFEV1 AUEC0-6 on Day 22 Using Day 22 BaselinePPFEV1 AUEC0-6 on Day 22 Using Day 1 Baseline
Albuterol-HFA-BAI29.47343.182
Placebo-HFA-BAI11.6726.767

[back to top]

Number of Donor Lungs Used for Transplantation

Number of lungs procured and used for transplantation (NCT00310401)
Timeframe: 72 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Albuterol74
Saline78

[back to top]

Donor Oxygenation

The primary outcome was the change in oxygenation as measured by change in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio from study enrollment to organ procurement (NCT00310401)
Timeframe: Change from enrollment to organ procurement (about ~40h after enrollment)

InterventioncmH2O (Median)
Albuterol49
Saline40

[back to top]

Chest X-ray Findings

Chest radiographs were scored using a radiographic score that scored each quadrant for extent of radiographic infiltrates on a scale of 0 to 4, then summed each quadrant for a total score from 0 (no infiltrates) to 16 (extensive infiltrates in all 4 radiographic quadrants). (NCT00310401)
Timeframe: change from enrollment to organ procurement (about ~40h after enrollment)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Enrollmentat organ procurement (about ~40h after enrollment)
Albuterol4.75.0
Saline4.64.4

[back to top]

Lung Compliance

Static compliance of the respiratory system using plateau pressure (Pplat) measured at end-inspiration and calculated using the equation static compliance = tidal volume/(Pplat - PEEP) (NCT00310401)
Timeframe: baseline and at organ procurement (about ~40h after enrollment)

,
Interventionml/cmH2O (Mean)
baselineat organ procurement (mean ~40h after enrollment)
Albuterol4852
Saline5056

[back to top]

Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 2

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the day in week 2 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 2

InterventionPuffs per day (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.24
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.309

[back to top]

Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 3

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the day in week 3 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 3

InterventionPuffs per day (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.337
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.41

[back to top]

Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 4

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the day in week 4 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionPuffs per day (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.287
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.399

[back to top]

Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 5

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the day in week 5 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 5

InterventionPuffs per day (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.275
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.345

[back to top]

Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 6

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the day in week 6 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionPuffs per day (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.259
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.405

[back to top]

Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 7

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the day in week 7 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 7

InterventionPuffs per day (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.313
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.398

[back to top]

Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 8

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the day in week 8 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 8

InterventionPuffs per day (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.301
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.471

[back to top]

Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 9

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the day in week 9 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 9

InterventionPuffs per day (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.369
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.43

[back to top]

Evening PEFR at Week 1

Weekly means for evening PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 1

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium222.89
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)222.64

[back to top]

Patient Global Evaluation

The Patient Global Evaluation reflected the patient's opinion of their overall condition with respect to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The scale responses were: Poor (1,2). Fair (3,4), Good (5,6) and Excellent (7,8) (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium4.273
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)4.069

[back to top]

Evening PEFR at Week 10

Weekly means for evening PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 10

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium220.46
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)216.32

[back to top]

Evening PEFR at Week 11

Weekly means for evening PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 11

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium218.35
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)217.17

[back to top]

Evening PEFR at Week 12

Weekly means for evening PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium219.66
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)215.46

[back to top]

Evening PEFR at Week 2

Weekly means for evening PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 2

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium221.97
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)221.12

[back to top]

Evening PEFR at Week 3

Weekly means for evening PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 3

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium221.23
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)218.52

[back to top]

Evening PEFR at Week 4

Weekly means for evening PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium221.96
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)215.06

[back to top]

Evening PEFR at Week 5

Weekly means for evening PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 5

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium217.95
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)214.53

[back to top]

Evening PEFR at Week 6

Weekly means for evening PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium218.45
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)219.42

[back to top]

Evening PEFR at Week 7

Weekly means for evening PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 7

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium220.98
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)220.79

[back to top]

Evening PEFR at Week 8

Weekly means for evening PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 8

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium223.33
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)218.2

[back to top]

Evening PEFR at Week 9

Weekly means for evening PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 9

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium221.47
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)217.41

[back to top]

FEV1 at -10 Minutes at Week 12

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before dosing

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.225
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.119

[back to top]

FEV1 at -10 Minutes at Week 6

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before dosing

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.254
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.108

[back to top]

FEV1 at 1 Hour at Week 12

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 1 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.327
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.41

[back to top]

FEV1 at 1 Hour at Week 6

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 1 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.343
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.405

[back to top]

FEV1 at 1 Hour on Day 1

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 1 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.272
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.455

[back to top]

FEV1 at 15 Minutes at Week 12

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 15 minutes

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.268
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.351

[back to top]

FEV1 at 3 Hours at Week 6

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 3 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.371
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.31

[back to top]

FEV1 at 15 Minutes at Week 6

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 15 minutes

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.3
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.355

[back to top]

FEV1 at 15 Minutes on Day 1

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 15 minutes

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.214
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.389

[back to top]

FEV1 at 2 Hours at Week 12

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 2 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.353
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.398

[back to top]

FEV1 at 2 Hours at Week 6

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 2 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.364
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.382

[back to top]

FEV1 at 2 Hours on Day 1

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 2 hour

InterventionLeast Squares Mean (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.293
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.43

[back to top]

FEV1 at 3 Hours at Week 12

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 3 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.353
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.333

[back to top]

FEV1 at 3 Hours on Day 1

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 3 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.29
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.375

[back to top]

FEV1 at 30 Minutes at Week 12

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.306
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.393

[back to top]

FEV1 at 30 Minutes at Week 6

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.328
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.388

[back to top]

FEV1 at 30 Minutes on Day 1

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.261
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.429

[back to top]

FEV1 at 4 Hours at Week 12

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 4 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.337
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.263

[back to top]

FEV1 at 4 Hours at Week 6

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 4 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.369
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.247

[back to top]

FEV1 at 4 Hours on Day 1

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 4 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.284
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.319

[back to top]

FEV1 at 6 Hours at Week 12

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 6 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.318
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.182

[back to top]

FEV1 at 6 Hours at Week 6

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 6 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.33
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.168

[back to top]

FEV1 at 6 Hours on Day 1

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 6 hours

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.269
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.233

[back to top]

FVC at -10 Minutes at Week 12

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before dosing

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium2.967
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)2.792

[back to top]

FVC at -10 Minutes at Week 6

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before dosing

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)2.722

[back to top]

FVC at 1 Hour at Week 12

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 1 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.177
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.375

[back to top]

Physician Global Evaluation

The Physician Global Evaluation reflected the physician's opinion of the patients overall condition with respect to COPD. The scale responses were: Poor (1,2). Fair (3,4), Good (5,6) and Excellent (7,8). (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium4.867
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)4.716

[back to top]

Physician Global Evaluation

The Physician Global Evaluation reflected the physician's opinion of the patients overall condition with respect to COPD. The scale responses were: Poor (1,2). Fair (3,4), Good (5,6) and Excellent (7,8). (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium5.057
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)4.772

[back to top]

Patient Global Evaluation

The Patient Global Evaluation reflected the patient's opinion of their overall condition with respect to COPD. The scale responses were: Poor (1,2). Fair (3,4), Good (5,6) and Excellent (7,8). (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium4.49
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)4.239

[back to top]

FVC at 3 Hours on Day 1

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 3 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.091
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.261

[back to top]

Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 9

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the night in week 9 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 9

InterventionPuffs per night (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.254
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.006

[back to top]

Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 8

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the night in week 8 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 8

InterventionPuffs per night (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.104
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)2.983

[back to top]

Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 7

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the night in week 7 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 7

InterventionPuffs per night (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.156
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)2.966

[back to top]

Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 6

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the night in week 6 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionPuffs per night (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.178
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)2.806

[back to top]

Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 5

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the night in week 5 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 5

InterventionPuffs per night (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.152
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)2.789

[back to top]

Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 4

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the night in week 4 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionPuffs per night (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.285
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)2.921

[back to top]

Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 3

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the night in week 3 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 3

InterventionPuffs per night (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.282
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)2.931

[back to top]

Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 2

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the night in week 2 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 2

InterventionPuffs per night (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.269
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.004

[back to top]

Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 12

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the night in week 12 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPuffs per night (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.178
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.069

[back to top]

Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 11

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the night in week 11 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 11

InterventionPuffs per night (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.224
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)2.907

[back to top]

Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 10

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the night in week 10 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 10

InterventionPuffs per night (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.199
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)2.909

[back to top]

Night Time Albuterol Use During Week 1

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 1

InterventionPuffs per night (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.493
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)2.966

[back to top]

Morning PEFR at Week 9

Weekly means for morning PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 9

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium208.97
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)194.74

[back to top]

Morning PEFR at Week 8

Weekly means for morning PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 8

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium208.88
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)195.22

[back to top]

Morning PEFR at Week 7

Weekly means for morning PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 7

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium208.72
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)197.66

[back to top]

Morning PEFR at Week 6

Weekly means for morning PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium206.49
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)195.38

[back to top]

Morning PEFR at Week 5

Weekly means for morning PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 5

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium205.6
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)193.55

[back to top]

Morning PEFR at Week 4

Weekly means for morning PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium206.76
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)193.19

[back to top]

Morning PEFR at Week 3

Weekly means for morning PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 3

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium206.61
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)193.83

[back to top]

Morning PEFR at Week 2

Weekly means for morning PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 2

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium206.07
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)194.81

[back to top]

Morning PEFR at Week 12

Weekly means for morning PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium206.52
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)192.44

[back to top]

Morning PEFR at Week 11

Weekly means for morning PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 11

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium206.47
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)195.47

[back to top]

Morning PEFR at Week 10

Weekly means for morning PEFR (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 10

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium204.83
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)193.23

[back to top]

Morning Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) at Week 1

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 1

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium205.8
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)195.1

[back to top]

FVC at 6 Hours on Day 1

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 6 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.053
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)2.972

[back to top]

FVC at 6 Hours at Week 6

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 6 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.190
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)2.914

[back to top]

FVC at 6 Hours at Week 12

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 6 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.155
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)2.932

[back to top]

FVC at 4 Hours on Day 1

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 4 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.087
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.136

[back to top]

FVC at 4 Hours at Week 6

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 4 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.23
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.068

[back to top]

FVC at 4 Hours at Week 12

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 4 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.199
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.074

[back to top]

FVC at 30 Minutes on Day 1

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.044
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.4

[back to top]

FVC at 30 Minutes at Week 6

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.158
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.362

[back to top]

FVC at 30 Minutes at Week 12

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.143
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.358

[back to top]

FVC at 3 Hours at Week 6

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 3 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.235
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.185

[back to top]

FVC at 3 Hours at Week 12

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 3 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.226
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.218

[back to top]

FVC at 2 Hours on Day 1

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 2 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.103
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.388

[back to top]

FVC at 2 Hours at Week 6

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 2 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.227
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.338

[back to top]

FVC at 2 Hours at Week 12

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 2 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.231
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.328

[back to top]

FVC at 15 Minutes on Day 1

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 15 minutes

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium2.938
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.308

[back to top]

FVC at 15 Minutes at Week 6

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 15 minutes

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.09
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.279

[back to top]

FVC at 15 Minutes at Week 12

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 15 minutes

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.069
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.263

[back to top]

FVC at 1 Hour on Day 1

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 1 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.087
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.444

[back to top]

FVC at 1 Hour at Week 6

(NCT00359788)
Timeframe: 1 hour

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium3.206
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)3.388

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Average Hourly FEV1 AUC0-6 (Area Under the Curve From Zero to Six Hours) at 12 Weeks

Average hourly FEV1 AUC0-6 minus baseline FEV1 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Weeks

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium0.187
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)0.167

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Average Hourly FEV1 AUC0-6 (Area Under the Curve From Zero to Six Hours) at Week 6

Average hourly FEV1 AUC0-6 minus baseline FEV1 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 6

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium0.207
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)0.153

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Average Hourly FEV1 AUC0-6 (Area Under the Curve From Zero to Six Hours) on Day 1

Average hourly FEV1 AUC0-6 minus baseline FEV1 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Day 1 (after first dose)

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium0.132
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)0.211

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Average Hourly FVC AUC0-6 (Area Under the Curve From Zero to Six Hours) at 12 Weeks

Average hourly FVC AUC0-6 minus baseline FVC (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Weeks

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium0.443
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)0.432

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Average Hourly FVC AUC0-6 (Area Under the Curve From Zero to Six Hours) at 6 Weeks

Average hourly FVC AUC0-6 minus baseline FVC (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Weeks

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium0.464
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)0.425

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Average Hourly FVC AUC0-6 (Area Under the Curve From Zero to Six Hours) on Day 1

Average hourly FVC AUC0-6 minus baseline FVC (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Day 1

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium0.327
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)0.484

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Peak FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at Week 12

Peak FEV1 is defined as the maximum FEV1 observed in the first three hours after dose of study medication (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium0.209
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)0.342

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Peak FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at Week 6

Peak FEV1 is defined as the maximum FEV1 observed in the first three hours after dose of study medication (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium0.204
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)0.356

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Peak FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) on Day 1

Peak FEV1 is defined as the maximum FEV1 observed in the first three hours after dose of study medication (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Day 1

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium0.232
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)0.364

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Peak FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) at Week 12

Peak FVC is defined as the maximum FVC observed in the first three hours after dose of study medication (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Weeks

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium0.418
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)0.703

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Peak FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) at Week 6

Peak FVC is defined as the maximum FVC observed in the first three hours after dose of study medication (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: baseline and 6 Weeks (after first dose)

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium0.43
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)0.791

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Peak FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) on Day 1

Peak FVC is defined as the maximum FVC observed in the first three hours after dose of study medication (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Day 1

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium0.542
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)0.824

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 12 Weeks

Trough FEV1 is measured 10 minutes before drug administration (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Weeks

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium0.081
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)-0.025

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 6 Weeks

Trough FEV1 is measured 10 minutes before drug administration (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Weeks

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium0.11
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)-0.036

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) at 12 Weeks

Trough FVC is measured 10 minutes before drug administration (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium0.225
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)0.051

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) at 6 Weeks

Trough FVC is measured 10 minutes before drug administration (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium0.258
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)-0.02

[back to top]

Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 1

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the day in week 1 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 1

InterventionPuffs per day (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.175
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.217

[back to top]

Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 10

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the day in week 10 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 10

InterventionPuffs per day (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.351
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.394

[back to top]

Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 11

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the day in week 11 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 11

InterventionPuffs per day (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.352
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.445

[back to top]

Day Time Albuterol Use During Week 12

Puffs of rescue albuterol used during the day in week 12 (NCT00359788)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPuffs per day (Least Squares Mean)
Tiotropium1.361
Combivent (Ipratropium/Albuterol)1.409

[back to top]

Assessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Pulse Rate

Pulse rate was recorded over time (Visit 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6). Baseline was the measurement at Visit 3. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. (NCT00363480)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 3) up to Week 12

InterventionBeats per minute (bpm) (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
SFC 50/250 mcg1.0-0.20.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Symptom Score at Week 12

The various symptoms like wheezing, shortness of breath, coughing and chest tightness were assessed by the participants every morning using a symptom score scale which ranged from 0 (no symptoms during the past 24 hours) to 5 (symptoms so severe that participant could not go to work or carry out other normal daily activities). Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments. (NCT00363480)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 3) and Week 12

InterventionScore on Scale (Mean)
SFC 50/250 mcg-0.590

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean ACT Score at Visit 6

The total ACT score is based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms not under control. In order to derive the total ACT score, all 5 questions had to be answered. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments. (NCT00363480)
Timeframe: Baseline (Viait 3) and Week 12

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
SFC 50/250 mcg5.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Morning Percent Predicted Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Week 12

PEF, a person's maximum speed of expiration, as measured with a peak flow meter, a small, hand-held device used to monitor a person's ability to breathe out air. The mean morning PEF evaluated by means of the data documented in the asthma diaries. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments. (NCT00363480)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 3) and Week 12

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
SFC 50/250 mcg7.798

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Additional Usage of Salbutamol at Week 12

Salbutamol was given as a rescue medicine, used on <= 2 days and at most 4 occasions per week. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments. (NCT00363480)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 3) and week 12

InterventionNumber of occassions (Mean)
SFC 50/250 mcg-0.933

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)

For the level of asthma control, baseline values were derived taking the last 8 weeks during the pre-treatment period prior to Visit 3 into consideration. Regarding derived variables based on the asthma diary, data from the last week prior to Visit 3 was taken. Visit 3, regarded as baseline. AQLQ has 32 questions regarding activities, emotions, symptoms, and environmental triggers. Each item values range from 1 (maximum impairment) to 7 (no impairment). A positive change from baseline score indicates improvement. (NCT00363480)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 3) up to Week 12

InterventionScore on Scale (Mean)
SFC 50/250 mcg0.83

[back to top]

Correlation of Change in AQLQ Score and Change in ACT Score

Correlation between change in the AQLQ and ACT score was tabulated using the Pearson coefficient of correlation (linear correlation). The AQLQ contained 32 items in 4 domains: activity limitation, symptoms, emotional function and environmental stimuli. Scores for the domains as well as the overall score were scaled within a range of 1 (worst) to 7 (best). (NCT00363480)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
SFC 50/250 mcg0.522

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) Leading to a Change in Asthma Treatment

AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Number of participants with AE who lead to change in asthma treatment were reported. (NCT00363480)
Timeframe: Up to Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Number)
SFC 50/250 mcg4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Occurrence of (Near-) Incidents Associated With Peak Flow Measurements

Frequencies of participants with at least one (near-) incident associated with peak flow measurements were recorded. analysis was done on safety population. (NCT00363480)
Timeframe: Up to Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
SFC 50/250 mcg0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Number of Nights With no Nocturnal Awakening at Week 12

Number of nights with no night time awakening were recorded at Week 12. Baseline was the last corresponding time period immediately prior to Visit 3. (NCT00363480)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 3) and week 12

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
SFC 50/250 mcg7.228

[back to top]

Assessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

SBP and DBP were recorded over time (Visit 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6). Baseline was the measurement at Visit 3. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. (NCT00363480)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 3) up to Week 12

Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
SBP, Week 4SBP, Week 8SBP, Week 12DBP, Week 4DBP, Week 8DBP, Week 12
SFC 50/250 mcg0.8-0.70.20.2-0.20.6

[back to top]

Assessment of Tolerability by Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Serious and, Non-serious AE

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Number of participants with at least one treatment emergent serious and, non-serious AE were reported. (NCT00363480)
Timeframe: Up to Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any Non-Serious AEAny Serious AE
SFC 50/250 mcg761

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) to Week 12

FEV1, an amount of air exhaled by a person during a forced breath in one second. FEV1 assessed at Visit 1 and at Visits 3, 4, 5, 6. Baseline was the measurement at Visit 3. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. (NCT00363480)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 3) up to Week 12

InterventionLitre/second (L/Sec) (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
SFC 50/250 mcg0.1330.2120.181

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Participants With ACT Score of 20-25 at Week 12

The total ACT score is based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms are not under control. In order to derive the total ACT score, all 5 questions needed to be answered. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments. (NCT00363480)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 3) and Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Number)
BaselineWeek 12
SFC 50/250 mcg32139

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Emergency Visits Due to Asthma

Frequencies of emergency visits per participant were recorded during treatment period. Only the participants at risk were considered when calculating the incidence rates. (NCT00363480)
Timeframe: Up to week 12

InterventionParticipants (Number)
At least 1 day1 day2 days3-4 days5-9 days
SFC 50/250 mcg1310210

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Well Controlled and Totally Controlled Asthma at Week 12

Well controlled or totally controlled asthma assessments were done according to the GOAL criteria. A week with well controlled asthma, when two or more of the criteria were fulfilled (diary entries): At most 2 days per week with 24-hour symptom score >1(Range: 0= None to 5= severe), rescue salbutamol use on <= 2 days and at most 4 occasions per week, and morning peak flow >= 80% of the predicted value on each day per week. All of the criteria which included no night-time awakenings due to asthma (diary entry),no emergency visits (diary entry), no exacerbations and no treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment change were fulfilled. The total ACT score was based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms are not under control. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments. (NCT00363480)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Well ControlledTotally Controlled
SFC 50/250 mcg6529

[back to top]

Percentage of Well Controlled Participants as Per Gaining Optimal Asthma Control (GOAL) Criteria After 12 Week Compared to Percentage of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score of 20-25 for Week 9 to Week 12

A week with well controlled asthma, when two or more of the criteria were fulfilled (diary entries): At most 2 days per week with 24-hour symptom score >1 (Range: 0= None to 5= severe), rescue salbutamol use on <= 2 days and at most 4 occasions per week, and a morning peak flow >= 80% of the predicted value on each day per week. All of the criteria which includes no night-time awakenings due to asthma (diary entry), no emergency visits (diary entry), no exacerbations and no treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment change are fulfilled. The total ACT score is based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms are not under control. (NCT00363480)
Timeframe: Week 9 to Week 12

InterventionPercentage (Number)
GOALACT
SFC 50/250 mcg33.564.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Lung Function Variable PEF by Spirometry

Spirometry was performed according to local standards. PEF is the maximum speed of expiration. Analysis was ANCOVA with factors value at Baseline, treatment, age, sex, center pool, ICS pretreatment, spacer use and asthma severity. Higher change numbers indicate better lung function. (NCT00384189)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide 40 µg20.68
Ciclesonide 80 µg21.71
Ciclesonide 160 µg22.25
Placebo15.13

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)

PEF is the maximum speed of expiration. A portable electronic PEF meter was used for the home PEF readings. The patients recorded PEF daily, in the morning immediately after getting up. Readings were done preferably at least 4 hours after use of rescue medication and before inhalation of the study medication. At each measurement, three readings were obtained in the standing position. All three values were recorded in the diary; the highest value was used for evaluation. The higher change from Baseline values are the best. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the baseline value and age as covariates was used for analysis. Last observation carried forward. (NCT00384189)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide 40 µg15.23
Ciclesonide 80 µg14.79
Ciclesonide 160 µg17.37
Placebo5.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ) Overall

PACQLQ assesses the impact of the child's asthma on the quality of life of the caregiver. The PACQLQ consists of 13 items in 2 domains evaluating activity limitations and emotional function. Caregivers answered each question using a 7-point scale from 1= maximum impairment to 7=no impairment about their experience during the previous week. Total possible score ranging from 13 (worst) to 91(best). Higher change from Baseline scores are the best. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the baseline value and age as covariates was used for analysis. (NCT00384189)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide 40 µg0.82
Ciclesonide 80 µg0.88
Ciclesonide 160 µg0.84
Placebo0.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire Standard [PAQLQ(S)] Overall Score

PAQLQS is a disease specific instrument to assess the impact of asthma on the patient's quality of life. The PAQLQS consists of 23 items in 3 domains evaluating activity limitations, symptoms and emotional function. Patients answered each question using a 7-point scale from 1= maximum impairment to 7=no impairment) about their experience during the previous week. Total possible score ranging from 23 (worst) to 161(best). Higher change from Baseline scores are the best. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the baseline value and age as covariates was used for analysis. (NCT00384189)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide 40 µg0.78
Ciclesonide 80 µg0.71
Ciclesonide 160 µg0.72
Placebo0.43

[back to top]

Change in Use of Rescue Medications

The daily use of rescue medication (salbutamol) was recorded in the electronic diary in the morning and the evening. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT00384189)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpuffs/day (Mean)
Ciclesonide 40 µg-0.872
Ciclesonide 80 µg-0.999
Ciclesonide 160 µg-0.886
Placebo-0.527

[back to top]

Percentage of Days With Asthma Control Based on Symptoms, Use of Rescue Medication, Morning PEF and PEF Fluctuation

Control of asthma was evaluated on a daily basis (24 hours) using the following variables: asthma symptoms, use of rescue medication, morning (am) PEF and PEF fluctuation. The median percentage of days with asthma control is presented. (NCT00384189)
Timeframe: 28 days prior to last visit (Up to 12 Weeks)

Interventionpercentage of days (Median)
Ciclesonide 40 µg7.14
Ciclesonide 80 µg10.53
Ciclesonide 160 µg6.67
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Time to First Event of Lack of Efficacy (LOE) by Week 12

Kaplan Meier Estimates of the probability of not experiencing LOE by Week 12 was measured. LOE was reached if any of the following criteria occurred during the treatment period: • asthma exacerbation (a worsening of asthma symptoms requiring a change in medication; • nocturnal awakenings due to asthma on any 4 or more nights during any 7-consecutive-day period; • use of more than 8 puffs/day of salbutamol on any 4 or more days during any 7-consecutive-day period; • decrease in morning PEF to <80% of randomization value on any 4 consecutive days during the treatment period. (NCT00384189)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionPercent (Number)
Ciclesonide 40 µg72.8
Ciclesonide 80 µg74.5
Ciclesonide 160 µg73.2
Placebo66.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morning PEF From Diary

PEF is the maximum speed of expiration. A portable electronic PEF meter was used for the home PEF readings. The patients recorded PEF daily, in the morning immediately after getting up. Readings were done preferably at least 4 hours after use of rescue medication and before inhalation of the study medication. At each measurement, three readings were obtained in the standing position. All three values were recorded in the diary; the highest value was used for evaluation. The higher change from Baseline values are the best. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the Baseline value and age as covariates was used for analysis. (NCT00384189)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1 thru 12

,,,
Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Week 1 (n=303,311,310,146)Change at Week 2 (n=303,311,310,146)Change at Week 3 (n=304,312,310,146)Change at Week 4 (n=304,312,310,146)Change at Week 5Change at Week 6Change at Week 7Change at Week 8Change at Week 9Change at Week 10Change at Week 11Change at Week 12
Ciclesonide 160 µg11.5412.2613.1515.6015.3914.7114.1413.6313.2314.5916.2417.59
Ciclesonide 40 µg11.619.8211.3613.6314.8613.9114.5714.5715.2616.3516.1215.93
Ciclesonide 80 µg9.2011.9511.1113.2713.3313.2615.0515.9216.0216.7915.9715.43
Placebo4.544.206.746.319.677.646.217.057.887.666.806.41

[back to top]

Percentage of Days With Asthma Control Based on Symptoms, Use of Rescue Medication and Morning PEF

Control of asthma was evaluated on a daily basis (24 hours) using the following variables: asthma symptoms, use of rescue medication, and morning (am) PEF. The median percentage of days with asthma control is presented. (NCT00384189)
Timeframe: 28 days prior to last visit (Up to 12 Weeks)

Interventionpercentage of days (Median)
Ciclesonide 40 µg8.33
Ciclesonide 80 µg13.64
Ciclesonide 160 µg13.04
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Change in Asthma Symptom Total Score

Measurements of both nighttime and daytime asthma symptoms were assessed on a daily basis by the patient in the electronic diary, according to the following scales: Nighttime Asthma Score using a 5 point scale: 0=no asthma symptoms, slept through the night to 4=bad night, awake most of the night because of asthma. Daytime Asthma Score using a 5 point scale: 0=very well, no asthma symptoms to 4=asthma very bad, unable to carry out daily activities as usual. Total possible overall daily score range from 0(best) to 4 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. (NCT00384189)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Asthma Total Symptom Score (n=304,312,310,146)Asthma Daytime Symptom Score (n=304,312,310,146)Asthma Nighttime Symptom Score
Ciclesonide 160 µg-0.879-0.517-0.350
Ciclesonide 40 µg-0.916-0.529-0.392
Ciclesonide 80 µg-0.983-0.553-0.435
Placebo-0.572-0.354-0.233

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diurnal PEF Fluctuations

PEF is the maximum speed of expiration. A portable electronic PEF meter was used for the home PEF readings. The patients recorded PEF daily, in the morning immediately after getting up. Readings were done preferably at least 4 hours after use of rescue medication and before inhalation of the study medication. At each measurement, three readings were obtained in the standing position. All three values were recorded in the diary; the highest value was used for evaluation. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the Baseline value and age as covariates was used for analysis. (NCT00384189)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Ciclesonide 40 µg-0.841
Ciclesonide 80 µg-1.209
Ciclesonide 160 µg-1.192
Placebo0.214

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Lung Function Variable Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

Spirometry was performed according to local standards. FEV1 is the maximal amount of air forcefully exhaled from the lungs in one second. Higher change numbers indicate better lung function. (NCT00384189)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide 40 µg0.123
Ciclesonide 80 µg0.122
Ciclesonide 160 µg0.139
Placebo0.039

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Evening PEF From Diary

PEF is the maximum speed of expiration. A portable electronic PEF meter was used for the home PEF readings. The patients recorded PEF daily, in the morning immediately after getting up. Readings were done preferably at least 4 hours after use of rescue medication and before inhalation of the study medication. At each measurement, three readings were obtained in the standing position. All three values were recorded in the diary; the highest value was used for evaluation. The higher change from Baseline values are the best. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the Baseline value and age as covariates was used for analysis. (NCT00384189)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide 40 µg10.16
Ciclesonide 80 µg9.37
Ciclesonide 160 µg12.71
Placebo4.02

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Non-serious).

(NCT00393367)
Timeframe: within 30 days of the ED visit

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
RhinorrheaHeadacheDiarrheaSore throatCoughHyperglycemia
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS)653422
Placebo (Normal Saline)1197330

[back to top]

Relapse / Readmission Numbers.

Participants admitted to the hospital within 5 days of the ED visit (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: within 5 days of ED visit

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS)2
Placebo (Normal Saline)2

[back to top]

Oxygen Saturation.

Mean oxygen saturation (non-invasive pulse-oximetry, % hemoglobin saturation) 2 hours after treatment with either budesonide/albuterol or saline/albuterol comparator minus mean oxygen saturation before treatment. (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: 2 hours after treatment with either budesonide/albuterol or saline/albuterol comparator

InterventionPercent Hemoglobin Saturation (Mean)
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS)1.0
Placebo (Normal Saline)1.0

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Remaining in the Severe Asthma Category

Of the patients who presented in the severe asthma category (Asthma Severity score of 12-15), those who remained in this category 2 hours after the budesonide/albuterol intervention or saline/albuterol comparator. (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: From the initial score to 2 hours after intervention with budesonide/albuterol or saline/albuterol comparator

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS)4
Placebo (Normal Saline)4

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Moving From the Severe Asthma to Moderate Asthma Category

Of the patients who presented in the severe asthma category (Asthma Severity score of 12-15), those who moved to the moderate category (Asthma Severity score 8-11) 2 hours after the budesonide/albuterol intervention or saline/albuterol comparator. (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: From the initial score to 2 hours after intervention with budesonide/albuterol or saline/albuterol comparator

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS)22
Placebo (Normal Saline)11

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Moving From the Severe Asthma to Mild Asthma Category

Of the patients who presented in the severe asthma category (Asthma Severity score of 12-15), those who moved to the mild category (Asthma Severity score 5-7) 2 hours after the budesonide/albuterol intervention or saline/albuterol comparator. (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: From the initial score to 2 hours after intervention with budesonide/albuterol or saline/albuterol comparator

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS)8
Placebo (Normal Saline)10

[back to top]

Number of Patients Hospitalized

The number of patients requiring hospital admission 4 hours after budesonide/albuterol intervention or saline/albuterol comparator. All hospitalization decisions are made at the discretion of the attending physician. (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: within 4 hours after the budesonide/albuterol intervention or saline/albuterol placebo

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS)56
Placebo (Saline)55

[back to top]

Median Change in Asthma Score 2 Hours After Intervention

The scale used is the Asthma Score published by Qureshi et al. The Asthma Score ranges from a low of 5 to maximum of 15 points. One to 3 points are given for each of 5 categories: age-based respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, wheeze, retractions, and dyspnea. For category detalails, please see the Qureshi reference. Scores of 5-7 are considered mild, 8-11 moderate, and 12-15 severe. Asthma Scores are recorded prior to any intervention and at 2 hours after budesonide inhalation suspension/albuterol intervention or saline placebo/albuterol comparator. (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: Initial asthma score minus score 2 hours after budesonide/albuterol intervention or saline placebo/albuterol comparator

InterventionUnits on a scale (Median)
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS)-3
Placebo (Normal Saline)-3

[back to top]

Mean Change in Asthma Score at 2 Hours

The scale used is the Asthma Score published by Qureshi et al. The Asthma Score ranges from a low of 5 to maximum of 15 points. One to 3 points are given for each of 5 categories: age-based respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, wheeze, retractions, and dyspnea. For category detalails, please see the Qureshi reference. Scores of 5-7 are considered mild, 8-11 moderate, and 12-15 severe. Asthma Scores are recorded prior to any intervention and at 2 hours after budesonide inhalation suspension/albuterol intervention or saline placebo/albuterol comparator. (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: Initial asthma score minus score 2 hours after budesonide/albuterol intervention or saline placebo/albuterol comparator

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS)-2.9
Placebo (Normal Saline)-3.0

[back to top]

Change in Mean Heart Rate

Mean of heart rate in beats per minute before treatment minus mean of heart rate 2 hours after treatment with either budesonide/albuterol or saline/albuterol (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: From the initial heart rate to heart rate 2 hours after intervention with budesonide/albuterol or saline/albuterol comparator

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS)12
Placebo (Normal Saline)13

[back to top]

Serious Adverse Events

Serious Adverse Events (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: 0-5 days

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Return within 5 days with hosptial admissionIncreased level of care
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS)21
Placebo (Saline)20

[back to top]

Mean Change in Respiratory Rate.

Mean respiratory rate in breaths per minute before treatment minus respiratory rate 2 hours after treatment with either budesonide/albuterol or saline/albuterol comparator. (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: Initial rate, minus rate taken 2 hours after budesonide/albuterol intervention or saline/albuterol comparator

InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS)-6
Placebo (Normal Saline)-6

[back to top]

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV!)

(NCT00394329)
Timeframe: Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 was measured on seven occasions during the 44-week treatment period. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 44 and week 0.

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS0.104
B: Daily ICS0.113
C: Rescue ICS0.097
D: Placebo0.063

[back to top]

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Morning Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)

(NCT00394329)
Timeframe: Morning PEFR was measured daily during the 44-week treatment period. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 44 and week 0.

Interventionliters per minute (Least Squares Mean)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS17.7
B: Daily ICS16.3
C: Rescue ICS16.5
D: Placebo21.1

[back to top]

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Measured in Parts Per Billion

(NCT00394329)
Timeframe: eNO was measured on seven occasions during the 44-week treatment period. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 44 and week 0.

Interventionparts per billion (Least Squares Mean)
Daily ICS + Rescue ICS-0.08
Daily ICS0.07
Rescue ICS0.58
Placebo0.34

[back to top]

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate Variability (PEFR)

(NCT00394329)
Timeframe: Evening PEFR was measured daily during the 44-week treatment period. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 44 and week 0.

Interventionliters per minute (Least Squares Mean)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS16.2
B: Daily ICS14.9
C: Rescue ICS12.9
D: Placebo20.6

[back to top]

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Asthma Control Test (ACT)

The ACT consisted of five questions, each ranging from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The five questions were summed to yield an overall score that ranged from 5 (worst) to 25 (best). (NCT00394329)
Timeframe: The ACT was measured on seven occasions during the 44-week treatment period. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 44 and week 0.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS0.17
B: Daily ICS-0.15
C: Rescue ICS-0.57
D: Placebo-0.76

[back to top]

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Asthma-specific Quality of Life Assessment

The asthma-specific quality of life scale ranged from 1 (worst) to 7 (best) (NCT00394329)
Timeframe: The asthma-specific quality of life assessment was measured on seven occasions during the 44-week treatment period. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 44 and week 0.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS0.15
B: Daily ICS0.07
C: Rescue ICS0.05
D: Placebo-0.03

[back to top]

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) Variability

PEFR variability represents the relative change between the evening and morning PEFR measurements, so it could be a positive or negative number. It was measured daily during the 44-week treatment period. Specifically, the PEFR variability on a specific day is defined as 100% x (evening PEFR - morning PEFR)/{0.5*(evening PEFR + morning PEFR)} (NCT00394329)
Timeframe: PEFR variability was measured daily during the 44-week treatment period. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 44 and week 0.

Interventionrelative change (AM and PM peak flow) (Least Squares Mean)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS0.836
B: Daily ICS-0.043
C: Rescue ICS0.098
D: Placebo0.894

[back to top]

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in the Asthma Control Days

(NCT00394329)
Timeframe: An asthma control day was determined daily during each of the 44-week treatment periods. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 14 and week 0.

Interventionproportion of asthma control days (Least Squares Mean)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS-0.006
B: Daily ICS-0.021
C: Rescue ICS-0.064
D: Placebo-0.034

[back to top]

Change Between Week 44 and Week 0 in Rescue Albuterol Puffs Per Day

(NCT00394329)
Timeframe: Rescue albuterol puffs were measured daily during the 44-week treatment period. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 44 and week 0.

Interventioncount of the number of puffs per day (Least Squares Mean)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS0.26
B: Daily ICS0.24
C: Rescue ICS0.26
D: Placebo0.18

[back to top]

Participants Experiencing an Asthma Exacerbation That Requires Systemic Corticosteroid Therapy

(NCT00394329)
Timeframe: Measured during the 44-week treatment period

Interventionparticipants (Number)
A: Daily ICS + Rescue ICS22
B: Daily ICS20
C: Rescue ICS25
D: Placebo36

[back to top]

Length of Stay

Time to discharge eligibility (hours) (NCT00410150)
Timeframe: Hospital discharge

Interventionhours (Mean)
Heliox Group66.2
Control Group63.4

[back to top]

Plasma Levels of IL-6 and IL-8 on Study Day 3

Biologic end-points were selected that would provide mechanistic insight into how albuterol improved lung function. Concentrations of two proinflammatory cytokines, interleukin 6 and 8 (IL-6 and IL-8), were measured. Plasma was collected and cytokine levels were measured at baseline and 3 days after randomization. IL-6 and IL-8 levels were normalized using log transformation. Wilcoxon's test was used to compare mean log-transformed interleukin levels per day and a mixed-effects model was fit to compare the slopes. (NCT00434993)
Timeframe: Measured at baseline and 3 days after randomization

,
Interventionpg/ml (Log Mean)
IL6IL8
Albuterol1.91.7
Placebo1.81.7

[back to top]

Number of ICU-free Days at 28 Days After Randomization

ICU (intensive care unit)-free days was defined as the number of days a subject was out of the ICU during study hospitalization from date of randomization up to study day 28. All incidences of ICU admission and discharge during the study hospitalization were captured. Any portion of a calendar day that a subject was in the ICU was counted as an ICU day. (NCT00434993)
Timeframe: Determined 28 days after a subject entered the study

Interventiondays (Mean)
Albuterol13.5
Placebo16.2

[back to top]

Number of Organ Failure-free Days at Day 28 Following Randomization

Subjects were followed for development of organ failures from date of randomization to hospital discharge or study day 28, whichever was first. Organ failure was defined as present on any calendar day when the most abnormal vital signs or clinically available lab value met the definition of clinically significant organ failure according to the Brussels Organ Failure Table. Each day a patient was alive and free of a given clinically significant organ failure was scored as a failure-free day. The worst value for a calendar day was captured (lowest systolic BP, platelet count and highest creatinine and bilirubin values). Specific definitions of organ failure were: cardiovascular-systolic BP less than or equal to 90 mmHg or on a vasopressor; coagulation-platelet count less than or equal to 80 x 1000/mm3; Renal-creatinine less than or equal to 2.0 mg/dL; Hepatic-bilirubin less than or equal to 2.0 mg/dL. (NCT00434993)
Timeframe: Daily from baseline to study day 28

Interventiondays (Mean)
Albuterol14.2
Placebo15.9

[back to top]

Ventilator Free Days to Day 28 in the Subset of Participants With ARDS

Difference in the main outcome Ventilator Free Days to study day 28 was calculated for the subset of patients with ARDS (defined as a PaO2/FiO2 ratio of less than or equal to 200). P/F ratio is an index of the effectiveness of arterial oxygenation that corresponds to the ratio of partial pressure of arterial O2 to the fraction of inspired O2. VFD to Day 28 is defined as the number of days from the end of ventilation to day 28 in patients who maintained unassisted breathing for at least two consecutive calendar days. Patients who died before day 28 were assigned a VFD count of zero. If a patient returned to assisted breathing, subsequently required assisted breathing, and once again achieved unassisted breathing, only the VFDs after beginning the final period of unassisted breathing were counted. An increase in the number of VFDs was considered a positive result. (NCT00434993)
Timeframe: Determined 28 days after a subject entered the study

Interventiondays (Mean)
Albuterol14.5
Placebo16.8

[back to top]

Ventilator Free Days to Day 28 in the Subset of Patients With Baseline Shock

Difference in the main outcome Ventilator Free Days to study day 28 was calculated for the subset of patients who were in shock at the time of randomization. Shock was defined as mean arterial pressure<60 or the need for vasopressors (except dopamine <6 ug/kg/min). (NCT00434993)
Timeframe: Determined 28 days after a subject entered the study

Interventiondays (Mean)
Albuterol10.0
Placebo13.9

[back to top]

Mortality Prior to Hospital Discharge With Unassisted Breathing to Day 60

Success for this efficacy variable was defined as being alive on study day 60 or having been discharged alive off mechanical ventilation from the study hospital (or subsequent hospital) to the subject's original place of residence. Those subjects alive in hospital at day 60 were considered to have survived. (NCT00434993)
Timeframe: Determined 60 days after a subject entered the study

Interventionpercentage of participants who died (Number)
Albuterol23.0
Placebo17.7

[back to top]

Hospital Mortality up to Day 60 in Subjects With Baseline Shock

Difference in the main outcome hospital mortality to study day 60 was calculated for the subset of patients who were in shock at the time of randomization. Shock was defined as mean arterial pressure<60 or the need for vasopressors (except dopamine <6 ug/kg/min). (NCT00434993)
Timeframe: Determined 60 days after a subject entered the study

Interventionpercentage of participants who died (Number)
Albuterol36.8
Placebo27.3

[back to top]

Hospital Mortality to Day 60 in the Subset of Participants With ARDS

Difference in the main outcome mortality to study day 60 was calculated for the subset of patients with ARDS (defined as a PaO2/FiO2 ratio of less than or equal to 200) prior to randomization. P/F ratio is an index of the effectiveness of arterial oxygenation that corresponds to the ratio of partial pressure of arterial O2 to the fraction of inspired O2. (NCT00434993)
Timeframe: Determined 60 days after a subject entered the study

Interventionpercentage of participants who died (Number)
Albuterol24.5
Placebo16.3

[back to top]

Mortality Prior to Hospital Discharge With Unassisted Breathing to Day 90

Success for this efficacy variable was defined as being alive on study day 90 or having been discharged alive off mechanical ventilation from the study hospital (or subsequent hospital) to the subject's original place of residence. Those participants who still remained in the hospital at 90 days after randomization were considered to have survived. (NCT00434993)
Timeframe: Determined 90 days after a subject entered the study

Interventionpercentage of participants who died (Number)
Albuterol24.3
Placebo18.5

[back to top]

Number of Ventilator Free Days (VFD)

Ventilator-free days (VFDs) is defined as the number of days from randomization to Day 28 after achieving unassisted breathing for patients who maintained unassisted breathing for at least two consecutive calendar days. If a patient achieved unassisted breathing, subsequently required additional assisted breathing, and once again achieved unassisted breathing, we counted only the VFDs after beginning the final period of unassisted breathing. Patients who died before Day 28 were assigned zero VFDs. (NCT00434993)
Timeframe: Determined 28 days after a subject entered the study

Interventiondays (Mean)
Albuterol14.4
Placebo16.6

[back to top]

Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Pre-Bronchodilator

Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Pre-Bronchodilator as measured by spirometry (NCT00521222)
Timeframe: Up to 16 weeks from baseline

InterventionLiter (Mean)
Arg/Arg Genotype on Advair (Fluticasone With Salmeterol) HFA-0.03
Gly/Gly Genotype on Advair (Fluticasone With Salmeterol) HFA-0.08
Arg/Arg Genotype on Fluticasone HFA-0.12
Gly/Gly Genotype on Fluticasone HFA-0.11

[back to top]

Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Post-Bronchodilator

Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Post-Bronchodilator as measured by spirometry (NCT00521222)
Timeframe: Up to 16 weeks from baseline

InterventionLiter (Mean)
Arg/Arg Genotype on Advair (Fluticasone With Salmeterol) HFA0.02
Gly/Gly Genotype on Advair (Fluticasone With Salmeterol) HFA-0.07
Arg/Arg Genotype on Fluticasone HFA-0.11
Gly/Gly Genotype on Fluticasone HFA-0.07

[back to top]

Change in Asthma Symptom Score

Asthma symptom score measures asthma symptoms on a scale from 0 to 3. 0 = No asthma symptoms; 1 = 1-3 asthma episodes each lasting 2 hours or less, all mild; 2= 4 or more asthma episodes that interfered with activity, play, school, or sleep for less than 2 hours; 3= 1 or more asthma episodes lasting longer than 2 hours, or resulting in shortening normal activity, or seeing a doctor, or going to a hospital. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. (NCT00521222)
Timeframe: Up to 16 weeks from baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arg/Arg Genotype on Advair (Fluticasone With Salmeterol) HFA0.3
Gly/Gly Genotype on Advair (Fluticasone With Salmeterol) HFA-1.2
Arg/Arg Genotype on Fluticasone HFA0.4
Gly/Gly Genotype on Fluticasone HFA0.5

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Morning Peak Flow

Absolute change in morning peak flow at the end of the 16-week study period compared with baseline (last two weeks of run-in). Peak flow measurement is a test to measure air flowing out of the lung. (NCT00521222)
Timeframe: Up to 16 weeks from baseline

InterventionL/min (Mean)
Arg/Arg Genotype on Advair (Fluticasone With Salmeterol) HFA-15.7
Gly/Gly Genotype on Advair (Fluticasone With Salmeterol) HFA8.4
Arg/Arg Genotype on Fluticasone HFA-5.6
Gly/Gly Genotype on Fluticasone HFA-14.4

[back to top]

Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Percent Predicted Pre-Bronchodilator

Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Percent Predicted Pre-Bronchodilator as measured by spirometry (NCT00521222)
Timeframe: Up to 16 weeks from baseline

InterventionPercent Predicted (Mean)
Arg/Arg Genotype on Advair (Fluticasone With Salmeterol) HFA-1.0
Gly/Gly Genotype on Advair (Fluticasone With Salmeterol) HFA-2.5
Arg/Arg Genotype on Fluticasone HFA-3.8
Gly/Gly Genotype on Fluticasone HFA-3.3

[back to top]

Area-Under-the-Effect Curve of Percent Change in Test-Day Baseline Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Versus Time (up to 2 Hours Postdose), %FEV1 AUEC0-2

The %FEV1 AUEC0-2 was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule. The baseline value consisted of the average of the two predose FEV1 measurements. The mean was obtained from the mixed-effect analysis of variance adjusted for effects from the study center, the treatment sequence, and study period. (NCT00530062)
Timeframe: Baseline, Up to 2 hours postdose

Interventionpercent change from baseline*hour (Mean)
Albuterol-HFA-BAI21.403
Albuterol-HFA-MDI20.457

[back to top]

Time to a 15% Increase From Baseline in FEV1 Within 2 Hours Postdose

The number of minutes required for the baseline FEV1 to increase by at least 15% within the 2-hour observation period. Median time and corresponding CIs were obtained via the Kaplan-Meier estimate. (NCT00530062)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 2 hours postdose

Interventionminutes (Median)
Albuterol-HFA-BAINA
Albuterol-HFA-MDINA

[back to top]

Time to a 12% Increase From Baseline in FEV1 Within 2 Hours Postdose

The number of minutes required for the baseline FEV1 to increase by at least 12% within the 2-hour observation period. Median time and corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained via the Kaplan-Meier estimate. (NCT00530062)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 2 hours postdose

Interventionminutes (Median)
Albuterol-HFA-BAI60.00
Albuterol-HFA-MDINA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a 15% Increase From Baseline in FEV1 Within 2 Hours Postdose

(NCT00530062)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 2 hours postdose

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Albuterol-HFA-BAI32.7
Albuterol-HFA-MDI30.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a 12% Increase From Baseline in FEV1 Within 2 Hours Postdose

(NCT00530062)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 2 hours postdose

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Albuterol-HFA-BAI57.1
Albuterol-HFA-MDI42.9

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in FEV1 up to 2 Hours Postdose

The mean was obtained from the mixed-effect analysis of variance adjusted for effects from the study center, the treatment sequence, and study period. (NCT00530062)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 2 hours postdose

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Albuterol-HFA-BAI14.319
Albuterol-HFA-MDI13.731

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Increase in FEV1

Each calculation for FEV1 took several minutes in order to obtain the highest of 3 measurements. The total collection time exceeded the 120 mins post-dose time frame for some participants. (NCT00530062)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 2 hours postdose

Interventionminutes (Median)
Albuterol-HFA-BAI48.00
Albuterol-HFA-MDI45.00

[back to top]

Area-Under-the-Effect Curve of Change in Test-Day Baseline FEV1 Versus Time (up to 2 Hours Postdose), FEV1 AUEC0-2

The %FEV1 AUEC0-2 was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule. The test-day baseline consisted of the average of the two predose FEV1 measurements. The mean was obtained from the mixed-effect analysis of variance adjusted for effects from the study center, the treatment sequence, and study period. (NCT00530062)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 2 hours postdose

Interventionliters*hours (Mean)
Albuterol-HFA-BAI0.443
Albuterol-HFA-MDI0.407

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in FEV1 Within 30 Minutes Postdose

The mean was obtained from the mixed-effect analysis of variance adjusted for effects from the study center, the treatment sequence, and study period. (NCT00530062)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 minutes postdose

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Albuterol-HFA-BAI10.777
Albuterol-HFA-MDI10.114

[back to top]

Participant Average Weekly Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Total Score Over the Entire GPS

The RQLQ has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0 (best) to 6 (worst), with a higher score indicating more significant impairment. (NCT00550550)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to the End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972431.45
Placebo1.77

[back to top]

Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) Over the Entire GPS

The DMS is composed of a sum of the scores associated with rescue medication use per day. Rescue medications were implemented when a participant had a symptom score >= 4. Rescue medications for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis were to be utilized in a step-wise fashion: loratadine, olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% opthalmic solution, mometasone, and prednisone, in that sequence. The score for the DMS ranged from 0 (no use of rescue medication) to 36 (maximum use of rescue medication). A lower medication score indicated less impact on symptoms and was suggestive of less use of rescue medication. (NCT00550550)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to the End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972430.91
Placebo1.33

[back to top]

Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Symptom Scores (DSS) Over the Entire GPS

The DSS is composed of six rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms which were recorded daily including runny nose, blocked nose, sneezing, itchy nose, gritty feeling/red/itchy, and watery eyes, and the symptoms were measured on a scale of 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptoms). A higher score indicated a higher level of symptoms and the total daily score could range from 0 (best) to 18 (worst). (NCT00550550)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to the End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972433.71
Placebo4.91

[back to top]

Participant Total Combined Symptom (TCS) Score Over the Entire Grass Pollen Season (GPS)

The TCS is the sum of the rhinoconjunctivitis daily symptom score (DSS) and rhinoconjunctivitis daily medication score (DMS) averaged over the entire GPS. The TCS ranged from 0 (no symptoms and no rescue medication use) to 54 (most severe symptoms and maximum use of rescue medication), with increasing score indicating a higher level of symptom severity. The DSS is composed of 6 rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms with scores from 0 (best) to 18 (worst), with increasing score indicating increased severity. The DMS is composed of a sum of the scores associated with rescue medication use per day. The range for the DMS was 0 (no rescue medication use) to 36 (maximum use of rescue medication), with a lower score indicating less use of rescue medication. (NCT00550550)
Timeframe: From the Start of the GPS to the End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972434.62
Placebo6.25

[back to top]

Participant Total Combined Symptom (TCS) Score Over the Entire Grass Pollen Season (GPS)

The TCS is the sum of the rhinoconjunctivitis daily symptom score (DSS) and rhinoconjunctivitis daily medication score (DMS) averaged over the entire GPS. The TCS ranged from 0-54, with increasing score indicating a higher level of symptom severity. The DSS is composed of 6 rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms with scores from 0-18, with increasing score indicating increased severity. The DMS is composed of a sum of the scores associated with rescue medication use per day. The range for the DMS was 0-36, with a lower score indicating less use of rescue medication. (NCT00562159)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972435.08
Placebo6.39

[back to top]

Participant Average Weekly Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (RQLQ(S)) Total Score Over the Entire GPS

The RQLQ(s) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment. (NCT00562159)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972431.30
Placebo1.57

[back to top]

Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Symptom Score (DSS) Over the Entire GPS

The DSS is composed of six rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms which were recorded daily including runny nose, blocked nose, sneezing, itchy nose, gritty feeling/red/itchy, and watery eyes, and the symptoms were measured on a scale of 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptoms). A higher score indicated a higher level of symptoms and the total daily score could range from 0 to 18. (NCT00562159)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972433.83
Placebo4.69

[back to top]

Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) Over the Entire GPS

The DMS is composed of a sum of the scores associated with rescue medication use per day. Rescue medications were implemented when a participant had a symptom score >= 4. Rescue medications for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis were to be utilized in a step-wise fashion: loratadine, olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% opthalmic solution, mometasone, and prednisone, in that sequence. The score for the DMS ranged from 0-36. A lower medication score indicated less impact on symptomology and was suggestive of less use of rescue medication. (NCT00562159)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972431.25
Placebo1.70

[back to top]

Participant Responses: Percentage of Participants With a >=12% Increase in Baseline PEF Within 30 Minutes Post-Dose on Days 1 and 22

"The PEF test is conducted by having a person blow as hard as they can into a mouthpiece attached to a sensor that measures the rate of air blown. This outcome counts participants who responded to therapy by obtaining a >+12% increase in PEF within 30 minutes of dose.~The baseline PEF was defined as the average of the two test-day pre-dose baseline PEF values." (NCT00577655)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 22: 35±5 and 10±2 min prior to dosing, and at 5±2, 15±5, 30±5 post dosing

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 (n=52, 51)Day 22 (n=51, 47)
Albuterol57.756.9
Placebo25.529.8

[back to top]

Participant Responses: Percentage of Participants With a >=15% Increase in Baseline FEV1 Within 30 Minutes Post-Dose on Days 1 and 22

"The FEV1 test is conducted by having a person empty their lungs of air into a mouthpiece attached to a sensor that measures the amount of air blown measured in liters. This outcome counts participants who responded to therapy by obtaining a >+15% increase in FEV1 within 30 minutes of dose.~The baseline FEV1 was defined as the average of the two test-day pre-dose baseline FEV1 values." (NCT00577655)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 22: 35±5 and 10±2 min prior to dosing, and at 5±2, 15±5, 30±5 post dosing

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 (n=51, 51)Day 22 (n=51, 47)
Albuterol17.617.6
Placebo9.86.4

[back to top]

Participant Responses: Percentage of Participants With a >=15% Increase in Baseline PEF Within 30 Minutes Post-Dose on Days 1 and 22

"The PEF test is conducted by having a person blow as hard as they can into a mouthpiece attached to a sensor that measures the rate of air blown. This outcome counts participants who responded to therapy by obtaining a >+15% increase in PEF within 30 minutes of dose.~The baseline PEF was defined as the average of the two test-day pre-dose baseline PEF values." (NCT00577655)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 22: 35±5 and 10±2 min prior to dosing, and at 5±2, 15±5, 30±5 post dosing

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 (n=52, 51)Day 22 (n=51, 47)
Albuterol44.241.2
Placebo19.623.4

[back to top]

Baseline Adjusted Area-under-the-Effect Curve for Percent of Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Over 6 Hours Post-dose on Day 22 Using Both Day 1 and Day 22 Baselines

"The FEV1 test is conducted by having a person empty their lungs of air into a mouthpiece attached to a sensor that measures the amount of air blown measured in liters. Values are then expressed as the percentage of FE1 values predicted for a 'normal' population. Predicted FEV1 values were computed and adjusted for age, height and gender according to Eigen et al. for subjects 4-5 years of age and to Quanjer et al. for subjects aged 6-11 years using American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria.~The area under-the-effect curves for percent-predicted FEV1 were calculated according to the trapezoidal rule and were based on actual (not scheduled) measurement times." (NCT00577655)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 or Day 22: 35±5 and 10±2 minutes prior to dosing), Day 22 (5±2, 15±5, 30±5, 45±5, 60±10, 120±10, 240±10, and 360±10 minutes post-dosing or last observation)

,
InterventionPercent of Predicted FEV1 * Hours (Mean)
Day 22 Baseline (n=52, 51)Day 1 Baseline (n=51, 51)
Albuterol31.04625.060
Placebo21.33824.167

[back to top]

Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Observed up to Two Hours Post Dose (FEV1max%0-2) on Day 22

"The FEV1 test is conducted by having a person empty their lungs of air into a mouthpiece attached to a sensor that measures the amount of air blown measured in liters. A standardized spirometer was used with the subject in the sitting or standing position (orientation had to be consistent for each subject during study visits) and wearing a nose clip. Whenever possible, evaluations were performed by the same respiratory therapist on the same calibrated spirometer at approximately the same time (±2 hrs).~The maximum percent change from baseline in FEV1 observed up to 2 hours following completion of dosing using Day 22 baseline. The baseline FEV1 was defined as the average of the two test-day pre-dose baseline FEV1 values.~The reason for the two primary endpoints was that FEV1 is difficult to obtain in children below 7 years of age." (NCT00577655)
Timeframe: 35±5 and 10±2 min prior to dosing, and at 5±2, 15±5, 30±5, 45±5, 60±10, 120 ±10 post dosing on Day 22 or last observation

Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
Albuterol12.849
Placebo9.353

[back to top] [back to top]

Time To Maximum Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Over Six Hours Post-Dose On Days 1 and 22

"The FEV1 test is conducted by having a person empty their lungs of air into a mouthpiece attached to a sensor that measures the amount of air blown measured in liters.~Time to maximum FEV1 is defined as the number of minutes required for the baseline FEV1 to increase to the highest FEV1 post dose during the 6 hour observation period.~Median time and confidence intervals obtained via separate Kaplan-Meier estimates for each study day." (NCT00577655)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 22: 35±5 and 10±2 min prior to dosing, and at 5±2, 15±5, 30±5, 45±5, 60±10, 120 ±10 post dosing

,
Interventionminutes (Median)
Day 1 (n=51, 51)Day 22 with LOCF (n=52, 51)
Albuterol43.9541.54
Placebo45.2561.05

[back to top]

Time To Maximum Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over Six Hours Post-Dose On Days 1 and 22

"The PEF test is conducted by having a person blow as hard as they can into a mouthpiece attached to a sensor that measures the rate of air blown.~Time to maximum PEF is defined as the number of minutes required for the baseline PEF to increase to the highest PEF post-dose for the 6 hour observation period. Median time and confidence intervals obtained via separate Kaplan-Meier estimates for each study day." (NCT00577655)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 22: 30±5 and 5±2 minutes prior to dosing, and 7.5±2, 20±5, 35±5, 50±5, 65±10, 125±10 post dosing

,
Interventionminutes (Median)
Day 1 (n=52, 51)Day 22 with LOCF (n=52, 51)
Albuterol41.5034.5
Placebo35.0063.00

[back to top]

Weekly Average Highest (Worst) Daily Asthma Symptom Scores for Weeks 1, 2 and 3

"Highest daily asthma symptom scores by study week. For this assessment, patients self-evaluate and record on the diary card the following asthma symptoms experienced during the day (i.e. last 12-14 hours): wheeze, shortness of breath, cough, tightness of chest. The worst of these symptoms were scored daily on a four-point scale:~0 = No symptoms occurred~1 = Symptom occurred but did not interfere with daily activity~2 = Symptom occurred but was sometimes annoying or interfered with daily activity~3 = Symptom present even at rest and was annoying or interfered with daily activity" (NCT00577655)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1 (N=50, N=50)Week 2 (N=50, N=49)Week 3 (N=47, N=48)
Albuterol0.3700.3760.336
Placebo0.4420.5470.474

[back to top]

Weekly Average Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Taken Each Day for Study Weeks 1, 2 and 3

Participants recorded every morning on awakening the number of asthma-related nocturnal awakenings requiring use of rescue medication that occurred during the previous night and the number of puffs of rescue albuterol used during the night after going to bed. At the end of each day, the number of puffs of albuterol rescue medication used during the day were recorded. (NCT00577655)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3

,
InterventionNumber of puffs per day (Mean)
Week 1 (N=51, N=50)Week 2 (N=51, N=49)Week 3 (N=49, N=48)
Albuterol0.0740.0840.078
Placebo0.0750.0880.088

[back to top]

Weekly Average Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Obtained Pre-Dose Each Morning

Participants measured their PEF as trained by taking as deep a breath as possible, placing their mouth firmly around the mouthpiece of the flow meter to form a tight seal, and exhaling as hard and as fast as possible. Subjects repeated the process twice at intervals of approximately 30 seconds, and then recorded the highest of the three PEF values on the diary card. (NCT00577655)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3

,
InterventionLiters/minute (Mean)
Week 1 (N=51, N=50)Week 2 (N=51, N=49)Week 3 (N=49, N=48)
Albuterol229.65229.90231.28
Placebo219.72218.97221.73

[back to top]

Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Observed up to Two Hours Post Dose (PEFmax%0-2) on Day 22

"The PEF test is conducted by having a person blow as hard as they can into a mouthpiece attached to a sensor that measures the rate of air blown. A standardized spirometer was used with the subject in the sitting or standing position (orientation had to be consistent for each subject during study visits) and wearing a nose clip. Whenever possible, evaluations were performed by the same respiratory therapist on the same calibrated spirometer at approximately the same time (±2 hrs).~The maximum percent change from baseline in the PEF observed up to 2 hours following completion of dosing using Day 22 baseline. The baseline PEF was defined as the average of the test-day pre-dose baseline PEF values.~The reason for the two primary endpoints was that FEV1 is difficult to obtain in children below 7 years of age." (NCT00577655)
Timeframe: 30±5 and 5±2 minutes prior to dosing, and at 7.5±2, 20±5, 35±5, 50±5, 65±10, 125±10 post dosing on Day 22 or last observation

Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
Albuterol17.558
Placebo12.127

[back to top]

Baseline-Adjusted Area-under-the Effect Curve for Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over 6 Hours Post-dose on Day 22 Using Both Day 1 and Day 22 Baselines

"The PEF test is conducted by having a person blow as hard as they can into a mouthpiece attached to a sensor that measures the rate of air blown.~The area under-the-effect curves for PEF were calculated according to the trapezoidal rule and were based on actual (not scheduled) measurement times." (NCT00577655)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 or Day 22: 30±5 and 5±2 minutes prior to dosing Day 22: 7.5±2, 20±5, 35±5, 50±5, 65±10, 125±10 post dosing or last observation

,
InterventionLiters/Minute*Hours (Mean)
Day 22 Baseline (n=52, 51)Day 1 Baseline (n=52, 51)
Albuterol120.82139.42
Placebo90.69396.842

[back to top]

Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) up to Two Hours Post-Dose (FEV1max%0-2, %) on Study Days 1 and 22 Using Observed Cases

"The FEV1 test is conducted by having a person empty their lungs of air into a mouthpiece attached to a sensor that measures the amount of air blown measured in liters. A standardized spirometer was used with the subject in the sitting or standing position (orientation had to be consistent for each subject during study visits) and wearing a nose clip. Whenever possible, evaluations were performed by the same respiratory therapist on the same calibrated spirometer at approximately the same time (±2 hrs).~The maximum percent change from baseline in FEV1 observed up to 2 hours following completion of dosing using test day baseline. The baseline FEV1 was defined as the average of the two test-day pre-dose baseline FEV1 values." (NCT00577655)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 22: 35±5 and 10±2 min prior to dosing, and at 5±2, 15±5, 30±5, 45±5, 60±10, 120 ±10 post dosing

,
Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
Day 1 (n=51, 51)Day 22 (n=51, 47)
Albuterol12.62112.601
Placebo8.0859.534

[back to top]

Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) up to Two Hours Post-Dose (PEFmax%0-2) on Study Days 1 and 22 Using Observed Cases

"The PEF test is conducted by having a person blow as hard as they can into a mouthpiece attached to a sensor that measures the rate of air blown. A standardized spirometer was used with the subject in the sitting or standing position (orientation had to be consistent for each subject during study visits) and wearing a nose clip. Whenever possible, evaluations were performed by the same respiratory therapist on the same calibrated spirometer at approximately the same time (±2 hrs).~The maximum percent change from baseline in the PEF observed up to 2 hours following completion of dosing on study days 1 and 22. The baseline PEF was defined as the average of the test-day pre-dose baseline PEF values.~The reason for the two primary endpoints was that FEV1 is difficult to obtain in children below 7 years of age." (NCT00577655)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 22: 30±5 and 5±2 minutes prior to dosing, and 7.5±2, 20±5, 35±5, 50±5, 65±10, 125±10 post dosing

,
Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
Day 1 (n=52, 51)Day 22 (n=51, 47)
Albuterol20.04016.776
Placebo12.46812.994

[back to top]

Maximum Percent-Predicted FEV1 (Max PPFEV1, %) Observed up to Two Hours Following Completion of Dosing on Study Days 1 and 22 (Observed Case)

The FEV1 test is conducted by having a person empty their lungs of air into a mouthpiece attached to a sensor that measures the amount of air blown measured in liters. Values are then expressed as the percentage of FE1 values predicted for a 'normal' population. Predicted FEV1 values were computed and adjusted for age, height and gender according to Eigen et al. for subjects 4-5 years of age and to Quanjer et al. for subjects aged 6-11 years using American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria. (NCT00577655)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 22: 5±2, 15±5, 30±5, 45±5, 60±10, 120 ±10 post dosing

,
Interventionpercentage of predicted FEV1 (Mean)
Day 1 (n=51, 51)Day 22 (n=51, 47)
Albuterol95.89894.650
Placebo89.37490.652

[back to top]

Participant Responses: Percentage of Participants With a >=12% Increase in Baseline FEV1 Within 30 Minutes Post-Dose on Days 1 and 22

"The FEV1 test is conducted by having a person empty their lungs of air into a mouthpiece attached to a sensor that measures the amount of air blown measured in liters. This outcome counts participants who responded to therapy by obtaining a >+12% increase in FEV1 within 30 minutes of dose.~The baseline FEV1 was defined as the average of the two test-day pre-dose baseline FEV1 values." (NCT00577655)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 22: 35±5 and 10±2 min prior to dosing, and at 5±2, 15±5, 30±5 post dosing

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 (n=51, 51)Day 22 (n=51, 47)
Albuterol33.329.4
Placebo13.714.9

[back to top]

Mean Heart Rate

Heart rate measured at various timepoints: predose and timepoints after each of the three dosings. Each treatment consists of one nebulization every 30 minutes over a 60 minute treatment interval (totaling 3 cumulative dosings at 0,30 and 60 minutes). (NCT00583947)
Timeframe: predose, various timeframes up to 5 hours post last dose

,,
Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Predose (n=51,52,40)15 min post dose 1 (n=51,52,40)30 min post dose 1 (n=51,52,40)60 min post dose 1 (n=51,51,40)15 min post dose 2 (n=50,51,40)30 min post dose 2 (n=47,50,40)60 min post dose 2 (n=46,50,37)30 min post last dose (n=49,52,40)60 min post last dose (n=49,52,40)1.5 hours post last dose (n=48,52,40)2 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)2.5 hours post last dose (n=49,52,40)3 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)3.5 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)4 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)4.5 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)5 hours post last dose (n=50,51,40)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg87.089.489.593.592.593.396.196.197.195.395.994.893.495.094.593.992.9
Arformoterol 7.5 Mcg84.785.286.689.087.588.989.390.393.391.891.290.290.689.889.389.689.8
Levalbuterol 0.63 mg87.689.390.996.495.497.1100.499.296.096.293.094.194.193.394.093.392.4

[back to top]

Change From Predose in Mean Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)

PEFR is the fastest rate at which air can move through the airways during a forced expiration starting with fully inflated lungs as measured by peak flow meters. Change in PEFR was calculated as postdose value minus the predose value at each visit. (NCT00583947)
Timeframe: predose, various postdose times

,,
Interventionliters/second (Mean)
10 minutes post dose 1 (n=37,38,27)25 minutes post dose 1 (n=37,37,27)10 minutes post dose 2 (n=36,38,27)25 minutes post dose 2 (n=36,38,27)10 minutes post dose 3 (n=34,38,27)25 minutes post dose 3 (n=35,38,26)2 hours post dose 1 (n=36,37,27)4 hours post dose 1 (n=36,38,27)6 hours post dose 1 (n=36,38,27)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg0.2590.2790.3600.4240.5130.4490.5010.4740.451
Arformoterol 7.5 Mcg0.2420.3200.3440.4190.4570.4620.5960.4840.513
Levalbuterol 0.63 mg0.3220.3990.4580.4520.5240.5390.5750.5090.324

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of (R,R) Formoterol

If the mean plasma concentration was 'below the limit of quantification' (BLQ) which was set as <=0.5 picograms/milliliter, the value is displayed as a zero. (NCT00583947)
Timeframe: predose, various postdose times

,,
Interventionpicogram/milliliter (Mean)
predose (n=51,52,39)25 minutes post dose 1 (n=50,46,36)25 minutes post dose 2 (n=48,47,36)2 hours post dose 1 (n=50,51,38)6 hours post dose 1 (n=50,50,37)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg0.7371.6593.3254.1892.818
Arformoterol 7.5 Mcg02.2361.8451.8850.874
Levalbuterol 0.63 mg0.6462.402000

[back to top]

Mean Systolic Blood Pressure

Systolic blood pressure measured at various timepoints: predose and timepoints after each of the three dosings. Each treatment consists of one nebulization every 30 minutes over a 60 minute treatment interval (totaling 3 cumulative dosings at 0,30 and 60 minutes). (NCT00583947)
Timeframe: predose, various timeframes up to 5 hours post last dose

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Predose (n=51,52,40)15 min post dose 1 (n=51,52,40)30 min post dose 1 (n=51,52,40)60 min post dose 1 (n=51,51,40)15 min post dose 2 (n=50,51,40)30 min post dose 2 (n=47,50,40)60 min post dose 2 (n=46,50,37)30 min post last dose (n=49,52,40)60 min post last dose (n=49,52,40)1.5 hours post last dose (n=48,52,40)2 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)2.5 hours post last dose (n=49,52,40)3 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)3.5 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)4 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)4.5 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)5 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg100.6102.6100.3103.2102.1101.9102.9101.6104.9103.0101.8101.3101.9101.4100.5101.5102.1
Arformoterol 7.5 Mcg101.5101.2102.5102.7101.7102.8101.9101.2103.0101.9103.4101.5102.1103.2102.1103.2104.1
Levalbuterol 0.63 mg102.1102.9104.6105.8105.0106.4107.2105.0106.1104.8104.6103.0106.1103.4103.6104.5106.7

[back to top]

Mean Serum Potassium Levels

(NCT00583947)
Timeframe: Predose, 2 hours and 6 hours postdose 1

,,
InterventionmEq/L (Mean)
Predose (n=51,52,39)2 hours post dose 1 (n=48,47,38)6 hours post dose 1 (n=48,49,38)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg4.313.713.87
Arformoterol 7.5 Mcg4.273.833.95
Levalbuterol 0.63 mg4.253.673.99

[back to top]

Mean Serum Glucose Values

(NCT00583947)
Timeframe: Predose, 2 and 6 hours post dose 1

,,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Predose (n=51,52,40)2 hours post dose 1 (n=48,47,39)6 hours post dose 1 (n=49,48,38)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg87.6120.6106.3
Arformoterol 7.5 Mcg87.5108.699.0
Levalbuterol 0.63 mg86.4114.5107.6

[back to top]

Mean Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)

PEFR is the fastest rate at which air can move through the airways during a forced expiration starting with fully inflated lungs as measured by peak flow meters. (NCT00583947)
Timeframe: predose, various postdose times

,,
Interventionliters/second (Mean)
predose (n=37,38,27)10 minutes post dose 1 (n=37,38,27)25 minutes post dose 1 (n=37,37,27)10 minutes post dose 2 (n=36,38,27)25 minutes post dose 2 (n=36,38,27)10 minutes post dose 3 (n=34,38,27)25 minutes post dose 3 (n=35,38,26)2 hours post dose 1 (n=36,37,27)4 hours post dose 1 (n=36,38,27)6 hours post dose 1 (n=36,38,27)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg3.5653.8243.8443.9253.9894.0774.0174.0664.0394.016
Arformoterol 7.5 Mcg3.5463.7883.8773.8903.9644.0034.0074.1784.0294.058
Levalbuterol 0.63 mg3.6043.9264.0034.0534.0474.1564.1764.2214.1553.970

[back to top]

Change From Predose in Mean Heart Rate

Heart rate measured at various timepoints minus the heart rate at predose. (NCT00583947)
Timeframe: predose, various timeframes up to 5 hours post last dose

,,
Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
15 min post dose 1 (n=51,52,40)30 min post dose 1 (n=51,52,40)60 min post dose 1 (n=51,51,40)15 min post dose 2 (n=50,51,40)30 min post dose 2 (n=47,50,40)60 min post dose 2 (n=46,50,37)30 min post last dose (n=49,52,40)60 min post last dose (n=49,52,40)1.5 hours post last dose (n=48,52,40)2 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)2.5 hours post last dose (n=49,52,40)3 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)3.5 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)4 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)4.5 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)5 hours post last dose (n=50,51,40)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg2.32.56.55.56.39.59.010.08.38.97.86.47.97.46.95.8
Arformoterol 7.5 Mcg0.52.04.42.84.54.75.68.67.16.65.55.95.14.64.95.3
Levalbuterol 0.63 mg1.63.28.77.810.013.211.98.78.95.66.86.75.96.65.95.0

[back to top]

Mean Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second(FEV1)

Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) is the volume of air forcibly exhaled in one second as measured by a spirometer. (NCT00583947)
Timeframe: predose, various postdose times

,,
Interventionliters (Mean)
predose (n=37,38,27)10 minutes post dose 1 (n=37,38,27)25 minutes post dose 1 (n=37,37,27)10 minutes post dose 2 (n=36,38,27)25 minutes post dose 2 (n=36,38,27)10 minutes post dose 3 (n=34,38,27)25 minutes post dose 3 (n=35,38,26)2 hours post dose 1 (n=36,37,27)4 hours post dose 1 (n=36,38,27)6 hours post dose 1 (n=36,38,27)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg1.4861.6201.6441.6611.6691.6891.7001.7041.6841.660
Arformoterol 7.5 Mcg1.5521.6681.6951.7211.7141.7311.7401.7541.7221.725
Levalbuterol 0.63 mg1.5541.7141.7121.7411.7351.7751.7821.7841.7321.667

[back to top]

Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure

Diastolic blood pressure measured at various timepoints: predose and timepoints after each of the three dosings. Each treatment consists of one nebulization every 30 minutes over a 60 minute treatment interval (totaling 3 cumulative dosings at 0,30 and 60 minutes). (NCT00583947)
Timeframe: predose, various timeframes up to 5 hours post last dose

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Predose (n=51,52,40)15 min post dose 1 (n=51,52,40)30 min post dose 1 (n=51,52,40)60 min post dose 1 (n=51,51,40)15 min post dose 2 (n=50,51,40)30 min post dose 2 (n=47,50,40)60 min post dose 2 (n=46,50,37)30 min post last dose (n=49,52,40)60 min post last dose (n=49,52,40)1.5 hours post last dose (n=48,52,40)2 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)2.5 hours post last dose (n=49,52,40)3 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)3.5 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)4 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)4.5 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)5 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg63.662.561.662.360.861.762.361.662.562.562.162.362.562.659.961.960.0
Arformoterol 7.5 Mcg63.262.062.562.563.362.262.062.062.162.362.359.761.460.563.162.263.0
Levalbuterol 0.63 mg62.561.460.863.461.763.162.863.463.563.163.860.763.262.062.962.662.3

[back to top]

Change From Predose of Mean Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) is the volume of air forcibly exhaled in one second as measured by a spirometer. Change in FEV1 was calculated as postdose value minus the predose value at each visit. (NCT00583947)
Timeframe: predose, various postdose timepoints

,,
Interventionliters (Mean)
10 minutes post dose 1 (n=37,38,27)25 minutes post dose 1 (n=37,37,27)10 minutes post dose 2 (n=36,38,27)25 minutes post dose 2 (n=36,38,27)10 minutes post dose 3 (n=34,38,27)25 minutes post dose 3 (n=35,38,26)2 hours post dose 1 (n=36,37,27)4 hours post dose 1 (n=36,38,27)6 hours post dose 1 (n=36,38,27)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg0.1330.1580.1750.1830.2030.2050.2180.1980.174
Arformoterol 7.5 Mcg0.1170.1420.1690.1620.1790.1880.1940.1700.173
Levalbuterol 0.63 mg0.1600.1590.1990.1940.2260.2260.2160.1630.098

[back to top]

Change From Predose in Mean Systolic Blood Pressure

Mean systolic blood pressure measured at various timepoints minus the mean systolic blood pressure at predose (NCT00583947)
Timeframe: predose, various timeframes up to 5 hours post last dose

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
15 min post dose 1 (n=51,52,40)30 min post dose 1 (n=51,52,40)60 min post dose 1 (n=51,51,40)15 min post dose 2 (n=50,51,40)30 min post dose 2 (n=47,50,40)60 min post dose 2 (n=46,50,37)30 min post last dose (n=49,52,40)60 min post last dose (n=49,52,40)1.5 hours post last dose (n=48,52,40)2 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)2.5 hours post last dose (n=49,52,40)3 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)3.5 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)4 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)4.5 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)5 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg2.0-0.32.61.61.41.81.14.42.41.30.71.30.9-0.00.91.6
Arformoterol 7.5 Mcg-0.40.91.1-0.30.8-0.3-0.41.50.31.8-0.00.61.70.61.72.5
Levalbuterol 0.63 mg0.82.63.72.63.34.02.43.51.82.30.43.91.21.32.24.5

[back to top]

Change From Predose in Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure

Mean diastolic blood pressure measured at various timepoints minus the predose diastolic blood pressure (NCT00583947)
Timeframe: predose, various timeframes up to 5 hours post last dose

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
15 min post dose 1 (n=51,52,40)30 min post dose 1 (n=51,52,40)60 min post dose 1 (n=51,51,40)15 min post dose 2 (n=50,51,40)30 min post dose 2 (n=47,50,40)60 min post dose 2 (n=46,50,37)30 min post last dose (n=49,52,40)60 min post last dose (n=49,52,40)1.5 hours post last dose (n=48,52,40)2 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)2.5 hours post last dose (n=49,52,40)3 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)3.5 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)4 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)4.5 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)5 hours post last dose (n=50,52,40)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg-1.0-1.9-1.3-2.8-1.9-1.8-1.9-1.1-1.1-1.5-1.3-1.1-1.0-3.7-1.7-3.6
Arformoterol 7.5 Mcg-1.1-0.6-0.70.1-1.1-1.3-1.2-1.1-0.9-0.9-3.5-1.8-2.6-0.0-1.0-0.1
Levalbuterol 0.63 mg-1.1-1.70.8-1.10.80.00.80.80.11.4-1.90.8-0.40.50.2-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Predose in Mean Serum Potassium

Change in mean serum potassium at the specified timepoint minus the predose value. (NCT00583947)
Timeframe: predose, 2 and 6 hours post dose

,,
InterventionmEq/L (Mean)
2 hours post dose 1 (n=48,47,38)6 hours post dose 1 (n=48,49,38)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg-0.62-0.39
Arformoterol 7.5 Mcg-0.42-0.31
Levalbuterol 0.63 mg-0.58-0.23

[back to top]

Change From Predose in Mean Serum Glucose

Change in mean serum glucose at the specified timepoint minus the predose value. (NCT00583947)
Timeframe: predose, 2 and 6 hours post dose

,,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
2 hours post dose 1 (n=48,47,39)6 hours post dose 1 (n=49,48,38)
Arformoterol 15 Mcg32.918.6
Arformoterol 7.5 Mcg22.412.1
Levalbuterol 0.63 mg27.120.3

[back to top]

Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Sec (FEV1) Measured in L/Sec

(NCT00585039)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 hours

InterventionL/sec (Mean)
Levalbuterol (Xopenex)19.8
Albuterol55.2

[back to top]

Clinical Asthma Score (CAS)

Change in clinical asthma score while in ED. 15 point clinical asthma score. Score ranges from 5 (no to mild respiratory distress) to a maximum of 15 (severe respiratory distress). (NCT00585039)
Timeframe: 4 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Levalbuterol1.7
Albuterol3.0

[back to top]

Hospitalization

(NCT00588406)
Timeframe: 6 hours

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Budesonide39
Placebo39

[back to top]

FEV1 Percent Predicted

(NCT00588406)
Timeframe: 4 hours post-randomization

Interventionpercent predicted of FEV1 (Mean)
Budesonide51.7
Placebo52.6

[back to top]

Average Daily Asthma Medication Score During a 2-months Evaluation Period in Autumn 2008

"Scoring per inhalation/tablet: 1-2 inhalations twice daily of salbutamol (200 ug per inhalation), 2 scores; 1-2 inhalation twice daily of budesonide/formoterol 80 (4.5 ug per inhalation), 4 scores; 1 inhalation twice daily of budesonide/formoterol 160 (4.5 ug per inhalation), 8 scores; up to 10 tablets once daily of prednisone (5 mg), 1.6 scores. The total maximum daily scores were 40.~The daily score for each medication step was calculated by multiplying the score per inhalation/tablet with the number of inhalations/tablets used (entered as units in the daily diary by the subject)." (NCT00633919)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Active4.4
Placebo4.7

[back to top]

Global Evaluation of Efficacy by Investigator at the End of the Evaluation Period in Autumn 2008

"The treatment efficacy was rated by investigators at the end of the evaluation period in autumn 2008. Investigators rated the asthma symptoms in comparison to when subjects entered the trial, using the categories: much worse, worse, the same, better, or much better.~The categories much better or better were grouped as improved. The categories the same, worse or much worse were grouped as not improved." (NCT00633919)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Investigator evaluation: ImprovedInvestigator evaluation: Not improvedInvestigator evaluation: Missing data
Active3070
Placebo24170

[back to top]

Global Evaluation of Efficacy by Subject and Investigator at the End of the Evaluation Period in Autumn 2007

"The treatment efficacy was rated by both subject and investigator at the end of the evaluation period in autumn 2007. Subjects rated their asthma symptoms in comparison to previous autumns and investigators rated the asthma symptoms in comparison to when subjects entered the trial, using the categories: much worse, worse, the same, better, or much better.~The categories much better or better were grouped as improved. The categories the same, worse or much worse were grouped as not improved." (NCT00633919)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Subject evalution: ImprovedSubject evaluation: Not improvedInvestigator evaluation: ImprovedInvestigator evaluation: Not improved
Active30173314
Placebo33143017

[back to top]

Global Evaluation of Efficacy by Subject at the End of The Evaluation Period in 2008

"The treatment efficacy was rated by subjects at the end of the evaluation period in autumn 2008. Subjects rated their asthma symptoms in comparison to previous autumn using the categories: much worse, worse, the same, better, or much better.~The categories much better or better were grouped as improved. The categories the same, worse or much worse were grouped as not improved." (NCT00633919)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Subject evaluation: ImprovedSubject evaluation: Not improvedSubject evaluation: Missing data
Active2881
Placebo28130

[back to top]

Average Daily Asthma Medication Score During a 2-months Evaluation Period in Autumn 2007

"Scoring per inhalation/tablet: 1-2 inhalations twice daily of salbutamol (200 ug per inhalation), 2 scores; 1-2 inhalation twice daily of budesonide/formoterol 80 (4.5 ug per inhalation), 4 scores; 1 inhalation twice daily of budesonide/formoterol 160 (4.5 ug per inhalation), 8 scores; up to 10 tablets once daily of prednisone (5 mg), 1.6 scores. The total maximum daily scores were 40.~The daily score for each medication step was calculated by multiplying the score per inhalation/tablet with the number of inhalations/tablets used (entered as units in the daily diary by the subject)." (NCT00633919)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Active4.1
Placebo3.6

[back to top]

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at 5 Minutes Post-dose

FEV1 was measured at 5 minutes after dosing with spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. The time of dosing was defined as the time corresponding to the use of the first inhaler device. The primary variable was analyzed using a mixed model containing the period baseline FEV1 as covariate. The period baseline FEV1 was the average of the FEV1 value measured in the clinic at 50 and 15 min prior to the study drug administration in that period. (NCT00669617)
Timeframe: Five Minutes Post Dose

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol 150 µg1.48
Indacaterol 300 µg1.50
Placebo1.38
Salmeterol/Fluticasone1.43
Salbutamol1.47

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in In-Clinic Peak Expiratory Flow to Postdose Timepoint at Visit 4

(NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Visit 4: pre-dose (approximately 28 days after randomization) , 30 minutes post-dose, 1 hour post-dose, 4 hours post-dose, 6 hours post-dose

,,
Interventionliters (Mean)
Visit 4, pre-doseVisit 4, 30 minutes post-doseVisit 4, 1 hour post-doseVisit 4, 4 hours post-doseVisit 4, 6 hours post-dose
Levalbuterol MDI0.290.290.400.300.20
Levalbuterol UDV0.040.420.160.110.09
Placebo-0.25-0.17-0.03-0.11-0.07

[back to top]

Rescue Medication Use - Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Doses Used Per Week

(NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Visit 2 to Visit 3 (the first 2 weeks of the study) , Visit 3 to Visit 4 (the second 2 weeks of the study), Visit 2 to Visit 4 (the entire 4 weeks of the study)

,,
InterventionDoses per Week (Mean)
Visit 2 to Visit 3 the first 2 weeks of the studyVisit 3 to Visit 4 the second 2 weeks of the studyVisit 2 to Visit 4 the entire 4 weeks of the study
Levalbuterol MDI0.10.40.3
Levalbuterol UDV0.00.10.0
Placebo0.0-0.4-0.2

[back to top]

Rescue Medication Use - Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Days Used Per Week When Used

(NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Visit 2 to Visit 3 (the first 2 weeks of the study) , Visit 3 to Visit 4 (the second 2 weeks of the study), Visit 2 to Visit 4 (the entire 4 weeks of the study)

,,
InterventionDays per Week (Mean)
Visit 2 to Visit 3 the first 2 weeks of the studyVisit 3 to Visit 4 the second 2 weeks of the studyVisit 2 to Visit 4 the entire 4 weeks of the study
Levalbuterol MDI-0.80.1-0.5
Levalbuterol UDV-1.3-1.0-1.1
Placebo-0.3-0.8-1.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in the At-Home Mean Daily Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF to Postdose Timepoint at Visit 3 and Visit 4)

Mean of the daily pre-dose PEF values in the week prior to visit in those subjects aged 24 to <48 months capable of performing acceptable and reproducible PEF maneuvers. (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Visit 3 (the week prior to Visit 3), Visit 4 (the week prior to Visit 4)

,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Visit 3Visit 4
Levalbuterol MDI15.0510.33
Levalbuterol UDV5.30-1.05
Placebo7.390.21

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in In-Clinic Peak Expiratory Flow to Postdose Timepoints at Visit 4

(NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Baseline, Visit 4, pre -dose (approximately 28 days after randomization)

,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Visit 4, pre-doseVisit 4, 30 minutes post-doseVisit 4, 1 hour post-doseVisit 4, 4 hours post-doseVisit 4, 6 hours post-dose
Levalbuterol MDI49.9248.9463.7647.5932.00
Levalbuterol UDV7.0347.4725.3220.2025.09
Placebo-17.26-11.690.94-4.67-2.06

[back to top]

Investigator Global Assessment - Question 2

Since the start of the study, how would you evaluate your ability to manage the subject's asthma? (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Visit 4 (End of 28 day treatment period)

,,
InterventionNumber of subjects (Number)
Much BetterModerately BetterSlightly BetterThe SameSlightly WorseModerately WorseMuch Worse
Levalbuterol MDI21121215000
Levalbuterol UDV2311714000
Placebo1917817010

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in In-Clinic Peak Expiratory Flow to Postdose Timepoints at Visit 2

(NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Baseline, Visit 2: , 30 minutes post-dose (on the day of randomization), 1 hour post-dose, 4 hours post-dose, 6 hours post-dose

,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Visit 2, 30 minutes post-doesVisit 2, 1 hour post-doseVisit 2, 4 hours post-doseVisit 2, 6 hours post-dose
Levalbuterol MDI23.2218.219.5417.21
Levalbuterol UDV21.7125.0511.7414.40
Placebo-5.42-2.83-4.22-5.24

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in In-Clinic Peak Expiratory Flow to Postdose Timepoints at Visit 3

(NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Baseline, Visit 3, pre -dose (approximately 14 days after randomization)

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Placebo-18.58
Levalbuterol MDI25.36
Levalbuterol UDV6.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Visit 4 in the Mean Daily Composite Score Based on the Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Assessments (PACA)

"The daily composite score is the sum of the scores of 5 domains: Nocturnal Awakenings Due to Wheeze and Cough, Daytime Wheeze, Daytime Cough, Shortness of Breath, and Asthma Symptom Score. A possible score of 0 (no symptoms) to 19 (severe symptoms).~The mean daily composite score at Visit 4 is defined as the mean of the daily composite scores in the week prior to Visit 4." (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Baseline, Visit 4 (Week 4)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-1.21
Levalbuterol MDI-0.67
Levalbuterol UDV-0.52

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Visit 4 in the Mean Daily Composite Score Based on the Daytime and Nighttime Asthma Symptom Scores as Measured by Pediatric Asthma Questionnaire

"The daily composite score is the sum of the scores of 7 items: Difficulty Breathing, Cough, Wheeze, Activity Limitation, Level of Activity Limitation, Overall Symptom Score, and Nighttime Asthma. The range for the PAQ is 0 (no symptoms) to 27 (severe symptoms).~The mean daily composite score at Visit 4 is defined as the mean daily composite scores in the 7 days prior to Visit 4." (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Baseline, Visit 4 (Week 4)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-1.39
Levalbuterol MDI-0.91
Levalbuterol UDV-0.47

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Visit 3 to Visit 4 in the Mean Daily Composite Score Based on the Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Assessment

"The daily composite score is the sum of the scores of 5 domains: Nocturnal Awakenings Due to Wheeze and Cough, Daytime Wheeze, Daytime Cough, Shortness of Breath, and Asthma Symptom Score. A possible score of 0 (no symptoms) to 19 (severe symptoms).~The mean daily composite score from Visit 3 to Visit 4 is defined as the mean of the daily composite scores from Visit 3 (inclusive) to the day prior to Visit 4." (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: The days from Visit 3 (inclusive) to the day prior to Visit 4 - approximately 14 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-1.08
Levalbuterol MDI-0.40
Levalbuterol UDV-0.52

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Visit 3 to Visit 4 in the Mean Daily Composite Score Based on the Daytime and Nighttime Asthma Symptom Score as Measured by the Pediatric Asthma Questionnaire

"The daily composite score is the sum of the scores of 7 items: Difficulty Breathing, Cough, Wheeze, Activity Limitation, Level of Activity Limitation, Overall Symptom Score, and Nighttime Asthma. The range for the PAQ is 0 (no symptoms) to 27 (severe symptoms).~The mean daily composite score from Visit 3 to Visit 4 is defined as the mean of the daily composite scores from Visit 3 (inclusive) to the day prior to Visit 4." (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: The days from Visit 3 (inclusive) to the day prior to Visit 4 - approximately 14 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-1.24
Levalbuterol MDI-0.61
Levalbuterol UDV-0.37

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Visit 3 in the Mean Daily Composite Score Based on the Daytime and Nighttime Asthma Symptom Scores as Measured by the Pediatric Asthma Questionnaire (PAQ)

"The daily composite score is the sum of the scores of 7 items: Difficulty Breathing, Cough, Wheeze, Activity Limitation, Level of Activity Limitation, Overall Symptom Score, and Nighttime Asthma. The range for the PAQ is 0 (no symptoms) to 27 (severe symptoms).~The mean daily composite score at Visit 3 is defined as the mean daily composite scores for 7 days prior to Visit 3." (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Baseline, Visit 3 (Week 3)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.82
Levalbuterol MDI-0.45
Levalbuterol UDV0.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Visit 3 in Mean Daily Composite Score Based on the Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Assessment

"The daily composite score is the sum of the scores of 5 domains: Nocturnal Awakenings Due to Wheeze and Cough, Daytime Wheeze, Daytime Cough, Shortness of Breath, and Asthma Symptom Score. A possible score of 0 (no symptoms) to 19 (severe symptoms).~The mean daily composite score at Visit 3 is defined as the mean of the daily composite scores in the 7 days prior to Visit 3." (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Baseline, Visit 3 (Week 3)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.83
Levalbuterol MDI-0.28
Levalbuterol UDV-0.22

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Visit 2 to Visit 3 in the Mean Daily Composite Score Based on the Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Assessment

"The daily composite score is the sum of the scores of 5 domains: Nocturnal Awakenings Due to Wheeze and Cough, Daytime Wheeze, Daytime Cough, Shortness of Breath, and Asthma Symptom Score. A possible score of 0 (no symptoms) to 19 (severe symptoms).~The mean daily composite score from Visit 2 to Visit 3 is defined as the mean of the daily composite scores from Visit 2 (inclusive) to the day prior to Visit 3." (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: The days from Visit 2 (inclusive) to the day prior to Visit 3 - approximately 14 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.82
Levalbuterol MDI-0.25
Levalbuterol UDV-0.15

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Visit 2 to Visit 3 in the Mean Daily Composite Score Based on the Daytime and Nighttime Asthma Symptom Scores as Measured by the Pediatric Asthma Questionnaire

"The daily composite score is the sum of the scores of 7 items: Difficulty Breathing, Cough, Wheeze, Activity Limitation, Level of Activity Limitation, Overall Symptom Score, and Nighttime Asthma. The range for the PAQ is 0 (no symptoms) to 27 (severe symptoms).~The mean daily composite score from Visit 2 to Visit 3 is defined as the mean of the daily composite scores from Visit 2 (inclusive) to the day prior to Visit 3." (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: The days from Visit 2 (inclusive) to the day prior to Visit 3 - approximately 14 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.87
Levalbuterol MDI-0.36
Levalbuterol UDV-0.08

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in In-Clinic Peak Expiratory Flow to Postdose Timepoint at Visit 3

(NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Baseline, Visit 3, pre-dose (approximately 14 days after randomization)

Interventionliters (Mean)
Placebo-0.23
Levalbuterol MDI0.14
Levalbuterol UDV0.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the At-Home Mean Daily Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF to Postdose Timepoint at Visit 3 and Visit 4

Mean of the daily pre-dose PEF values in the week prior to visit in those subjects aged 24 to <48 months capable of performing acceptable and reproducible PEF maneuvers. (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Baseline, Visit 3 (the week prior to Visit 3) and Visit 4

,,
Interventionliters (Mean)
Visit 3Visit 4
Levalbuterol MDI0.120.08
Levalbuterol UDV0.01-0.01
Placebo0.070.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in In-Clinic Peak Expiratory Flow to Postdose Timepoints at Visit 2

Peak expiratory flow (PEF) measures how fast a person can breathe out using the greatest effort (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Baseline, Visit 2: 30 minutes post-dose (on the day of randomization), 1 hour post-dose, 4 hours post-dose, 6 hours post-dose

,,
Interventionliters (Mean)
Visit 2, 30 minutes post-doseVisit 2, 1 hour post-doseVisit 2, 4 hours post-doseVisit 2, 6 hours post-dose
Levalbuterol MDI0.170.130.060.12
Levalbuterol UDV0.160.180.040.06
Placebo-0.08-0.04-0.09-0.07

[back to top]

Caregiver Global Assessment - Question 3

Overall I was: Very satisfied with the control of the child's asthma symptoms while enrolled in this study, Moderately satisfied with the control of the child's asthma symptoms while enrolled in this study, Slightly satisfied with the control of the child's asthma symptoms while enrolled in this study, Not satisfied with the control of the child's asthma symptoms while enrolled in this study or answer Missing (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Visit 4 (End of 28 day treatment period)

,,
InterventionNumber of subjects (Number)
Very satisfiedModerately satisfiedSlightly satisfiedNot satisfied
Levalbuterol MDI451221
Levalbuterol UDV45712
Placebo471140

[back to top]

Caregiver Global Assessment - Question 2

Since the start of the study, how would you evaluate your ability to manage your child's asthma? (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Visit 4 (End of 28 day treatment period)

,,
InterventionNumber of subjects (Number)
Much BetterModerately BetterSlightly BetterThe SameSlightly WorseModerately WorseMuch Worse
Levalbuterol MDI3261012000
Levalbuterol UDV2910412000
Placebo27121111100

[back to top]

Caregiver Global Assessment - Question 1

Since the start of the study, how would you evaluate your child's asthma symptoms? (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Visit 4 (End of 28 day treatment period)

,,
InterventionNumber of subjects (Number)
Much BetterModerately BetterSlightly BetterThe SameSlightly WorseModerately WorseMuch Worse
Levalbuterol MDI21141211200
Levalbuterol UDV2113812010
Placebo21161212100

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Visit 3 and Visit 4 in the Pediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLA) Composite Score

The PACQLQ composite score was calculated as the mean of the scores of the 13 individual questions. Composite scores could range from 1 to 7. Lower scores indicated greater impact of disease on quality of life. (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Visit 3 and Visit 4 (End of 28 day treatment period)

,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Visit 3Visit 4
Levalbuterol MDI0.350.44
Levalbuterol UDV0.180.21
Placebo0.340.41

[back to top]

Investigator Global Assessment - Question 1

Since the start of the study, how would you evaluate the child's asthma symptoms? (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Visit 4 (End of 28 day treatment period)

,,
InterventionNumber of subjects (Number)
Much BetterModerately BetterSlightly BetterThe SameSlightly WorseModerately WorseMuch Worse
Levalbuterol MDI17151412110
Levalbuterol UDV16131113110
Placebo12231214010

[back to top]

Rescue Medication Use - Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Doses Used Per Week During Weeks When Used

(NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Visit 2 to Visit 3 (the first 2 weeks of the study), Visit 3 to Visit 4 (the second 2 weeks of the study), Visit 2 to Visit 4 (the entire 4 weeks of the study)

,,
InterventionDoses per Week (Mean)
Visit 2 to Visit 3 the first 2 weeks of the studyVisit 3 to Visit 4 the second 2 weeks of the studyVisit 2 to Visit 4 the entire 4 weeks of the study
Levalbuterol MDI-0.62.81.8
Levalbuterol UDV-1.3-0.8-0.8
Placebo-2.1-2.9-2.1

[back to top]

Rescue Medication Use: Number of Subjects Using Rescue Medication During the Treatment Period

Number of subjects using rescue medication during the treatment period (NCT00809757)
Timeframe: Visit 2 to Visit 3 (the first 2 weeks of the study) , Visit 3 to Visit 4 (the second 2 weeks of the study), Visit 2 to Visit 4 (the entire 4 weeks of the study)

,,
InterventionNumber of subjects (Number)
Visit 2 to Visit 3 the first 2 weeks of the studyVisit 3 to Visit 4 the second 2 weeks of the studyVisit 2 to Visit 4 the entire 4 weeks of the study
Levalbuterol MDI202029
Levalbuterol UDV141220
Placebo242033

[back to top]

Peak FEV1 Response (Crossover Part of the Study)

Change from baseline after 4 weeks in peak Forced Expiratory Volume response (NCT00818454)
Timeframe: Test day baseline and test day peak FEV1, after 4 weeks

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Albuterol HFA0.357
Combivent CFC0.434

[back to top]

Puffs Open-label Albuterol Used During Night (Crossover Part of the Study)

Change from baseline in weekly mean of puffs of open-label albuterol used during night (NCT00818454)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks

InterventionPuffs (Least Squares Mean)
Albuterol HFA-0.92
Combivent CFC-0.93

[back to top]

Puffs Open-label Albuterol Used During Day (Crossover Part of the Study)

Change from baseline in weekly mean of puffs of open-label albuterol used during day (NCT00818454)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks

InterventionPuffs (Least Squares Mean)
Albuterol HFA-2.24
Combivent CFC-2.28

[back to top]

Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Crossover Part of the Study)

Change from baseline after 4 weeks in Mini-AQLQ score. Worst score - 1 (most severe), best score - 7 (less severe) (NCT00818454)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks

InterventionScores on scale (Least Squares Mean)
Albuterol HFA0.150
Combivent CFC0.220

[back to top]

Asthma Control Questionnaire (Crossover Part of the Study)

Change from baseline after 4 weeks in ACQ score. Worst score - 6(most severe), best score - 0 (no symptoms) (NCT00818454)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks

InterventionScores on scale (Least Squares Mean)
Albuterol HFA-0.25
Combivent CFC-0.25

[back to top]

FEV1 AUC0-6 Response (Parallel Part of the Study)

Change from baseline after 4 weeks in Forced Expiratory Volume Area Under the Curve from 0 to 6 hours (NCT00818454)
Timeframe: Test day baseline and test day FEV1 AUC 0-6, after 4 weeks

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Respimat0.041
Combivent Respimat0.236

[back to top]

FEV1 AUC0-6 Response (Crossover Part of the Study)

Change from baseline after 4 weeks in Forced Expiratory Volume Area Under (FEV1 AUC) the Curve from 0 to 6 hours. (NCT00818454)
Timeframe: Test day baseline and test day FEV1 AUC 0-6, after 4 weeks

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Albuterol HFA0.167
Combivent CFC0.252

[back to top]

Peak FEV1 Response

Change from baseline after 4 weeks in peak Forced Expiratory Volume response (NCT00818454)
Timeframe: Test day baseline and test day peak FEV1, after 4 weeks

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Respimat0.199
Combivent Respimat0.412

[back to top]

Puffs Study Medication Used During Night (Crossover Part of the Study)

Change from baseline in weekly mean of puffs of blinded study medication (albuterol HFA or combivent CFC) used during night (NCT00818454)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks

InterventionPuffs (Least Squares Mean)
Albuterol HFA-0.10
Combivent CFC-0.12

[back to top]

Puffs Study Medication Used During Day (Crossover Part of the Study)

Change from baseline in weekly mean of puffs of blinded study medication (albuterol HFA or combivent CFC) used during day (NCT00818454)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks

InterventionPuffs (Least Squares Mean)
Albuterol HFA-0.49
Combivent CFC-0.53

[back to top]

Effect Maximum (Emax)

Maximum percentage of predicted FEV1 effect (NCT00940927)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after each dose

Interventionpercentage of predicted (Number)
Albuterol24.0

[back to top]

Effective Dose 50% (ED50)

ED50 is the cumulative dose of albuterol required to bring about 50% of maximum effect of albuterol (NCT00940927)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after each dose

Interventionug (Number)
Albuterol141

[back to top]

Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 24

"Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?. Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied)." (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat6.3
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol6.0
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols5.8

[back to top]

Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 12

"Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?. Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied)." (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat6.2
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol6.0
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols5.8

[back to top]

Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 48

Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 48 (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionnumber of puffs (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat2.0
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol2.1
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols1.8

[back to top]

Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 36

Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 36 (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 36 weeks

Interventionnumber of puffs (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat1.9
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol2.1
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols1.8

[back to top]

Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 3

Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 3 (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 3 weeks

Interventionnumber of puffs (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat1.7
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol1.8
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols1.7

[back to top]

Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 24

Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 24 (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionnumber of puffs (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat2.1
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol2.0
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols1.6

[back to top]

Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 12

Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 12 (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionnumber of puffs (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat1.9
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol1.9
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols1.7

[back to top]

Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 0

Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 0 (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 0 weeks

Interventionnumber of puffs (Mean)
Combivent Respimat2.1
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol1.5
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols1.9

[back to top]

Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 48

CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited). (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat2.8
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol2.7
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols2.9

[back to top]

Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 36

CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited). (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 36 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat2.7
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol2.8
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols2.7

[back to top]

Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 36

"Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?. Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied)." (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 36 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat6.4
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol6.0
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols5.9

[back to top]

Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 12

"Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from poor (score 1 or 2) to excellent (score 7 or 8)." (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat5.1
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol5.2
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols5.0

[back to top]

Number of Patients Having Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations Leading to Hospitalization

(NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
None1 exacerbation2 exacerbations3 or more exacerbations
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols146800
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol148600
Combivent Respimat147901

[back to top]

Number of Patients Having Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations

(NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
None1 exacerbation2 exacerbations3 exacerbations4 exacerbations5 or more exacerbations
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols110375200
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol113329000
Combivent Respimat118277311

[back to top]

Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 48

"Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from poor (score 1 or 2) to excellent (score 7 or 8)." (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat5.2
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol5.3
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols5.1

[back to top]

Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 36

"Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from poor (score 1 or 2) to excellent (score 7 or 8)." (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 36 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat5.1
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol5.2
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols5.2

[back to top]

Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 3

"Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from poor (score 1 or 2) to excellent (score 7 or 8)." (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 3 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat5.0
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol5.1
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols5.1

[back to top]

Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 24

"Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from poor (score 1 or 2) to excellent (score 7 or 8)." (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat5.1
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol5.2
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols5.2

[back to top]

Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 0

"Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from poor (score 1 or 2) to excellent (score 7 or 8)." (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 0 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Combivent Respimat5.1
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol4.9
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols4.9

[back to top]

Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 0

CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited). (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 0 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Combivent Respimat2.8
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol2.7
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols2.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Day 1

Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose on test day 1. (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: baseline, day 1

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat0.22
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol0.21
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols0.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12

Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 12 (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat0.23
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol0.19
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols0.20

[back to top]

Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 0

"Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?. Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied)." (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 0 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Combivent Respimat5.8
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol5.9
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols5.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 24

Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 24 (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeks

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat0.20
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol0.21
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols0.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 48

Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 48 (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: baseline, 48 weeks

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat0.22
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol0.16
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols0.23

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FVC at Day 1

Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose on test day 1. (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: baseline, day 1

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat0.37
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol0.34
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols0.36

[back to top]

Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 48

Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied). (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat87.9
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol78.3
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols81.7

[back to top]

Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 36

Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied). (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 36 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat88.2
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol76.9
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols80.5

[back to top]

Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 3

Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied). (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 3 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat84.7
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol79.4
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols77.3

[back to top]

Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 24

Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied). (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat86.6
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol77.5
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols78.9

[back to top]

Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 12

Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied). (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat85.9
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol78.0
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols76.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 12

Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 12 (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat0.38
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol0.31
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols0.35

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 24

Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 24 (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeks

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat0.33
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol0.35
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols0.35

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 48

Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 48 (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: baseline, 48 weeks

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat0.35
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol0.30
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols0.37

[back to top]

Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 12

CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited). (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat2.8
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol2.9
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols2.8

[back to top]

Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 24

CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited). (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat2.7
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol2.8
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols2.8

[back to top]

Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 3

CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited). (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 3 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat2.7
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol2.7
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols2.8

[back to top]

Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 48

"Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?. Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied)." (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat6.3
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol6.1
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols6.0

[back to top]

Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 3

"Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?. Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied)." (NCT01019694)
Timeframe: 3 weeks

Interventionunit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combivent Respimat6.2
Combivent Inhalation Aerosol6.1
Atrovent + Albuterol Aerosols5.9

[back to top]

Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6)

"FEV1 AUC 0-6 is the area under the effect-time curve from time 0 (pre-dose) up to 6 hours post-dose. The baseline for each study day was the average of the 2 pre-dose FEV1 measurements on that study day.~The first baseline spirometry was obtained between 6-11 AM. The highest FEV1 value from two acceptable values was captured for calculation of the efficacy endpoints. Assessments were obtained at approximately 0.5 hours and immediately before dosing, and 5 minutes, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 hours after completion of dosing." (NCT01058863)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 30

InterventionL*hour (Mean)
Albuterol Spiromax® 90 mcg1.21
Albuterol Spiromax® 180 mcg1.39
ProAir® HFA 90 mcg1.12
ProAir® HFA 180 mcg1.33
Placebo Inhaler0.24

[back to top]

Baseline-adjusted Percent-Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (PPFEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6)

"Percent-predicted FEV1 AUC 0-6 is the area under the effect-time curve from time 0 (pre-dose) up to 6 hours post-dose. Percent-predicted FEV1 is the expected FEV1 taking into account age, height, gender and race, as per the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES III) reference values.~The first baseline spirometry was obtained between 6-11 AM. The highest FEV1 value from two acceptable values was captured for calculation of the efficacy endpoints. Assessments were obtained at approximately 0.5 hours and immediately before dosing, and 5 minutes, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 hours after completion of dosing." (NCT01058863)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 30

Intervention% predicted * hour (Mean)
Albuterol Spiromax® 90 mcg35.31
Albuterol Spiromax® 180 mcg41.05
ProAir® HFA 90 mcg33.19
ProAir® HFA 180 mcg40.68
Placebo Inhaler7.58

[back to top]

Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

Adverse events (AEs) summarized in this table are those that began or worsened after treatment with study drug (treatment-emergent AEs). An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. (NCT01058863)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 37

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventTreatment-related AEWithdrawn from study due to AEsAny serious AEsTreatment-related serious AEOnset treatment for AE: Placebo InhalerOnset treatment for AE: Albuterol Spiromax 90mcgOnset treatment for AE: Albuterol Spiromax 180mcgOnset treatment for AE: ProAir HFA 90 mcgOnset treatment for AE: ProAir HFA 180 mcg
All Randomized Participants9000023302

[back to top]

FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 240 Minutes After Inhalations of Study Drug as Percentage of Pre-dose

percent of pre-dose (ratio) (NCT01096017)
Timeframe: At two visits during a maximum of 15 days

InterventionPercentage of Pre-Dose FEV1 (Geometric Mean)
Salbutamol pMDI113.59
Terbutaline Turbuhaler®117.05

[back to top]

FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 30 Minutes After Inhalations of Study Drug as Percentage of Pre-dose

percent of pre-dose (ratio) (NCT01096017)
Timeframe: At two visits during a maximum of 15 days

InterventionPercentage of Pre-Dose FEV1 (Geometric Mean)
Salbutamol pMDI119.42
Terbutaline Turbuhaler®117.02

[back to top]

FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 5 Minutes After Inhalations of Study Drug as Percentage of Pre-dose

percent of pre-dose (ratio) (NCT01096017)
Timeframe: At two visits during a maximum of 15 days

InterventionPercentage of Pre-Dose FEV1 (Geometric Mean)
Salbutamol pMDI115.58
Terbutaline Turbuhaler®112.80

[back to top]

FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 60 Minutes After Inhalations of Study Drug as Percentage of Pre-dose

percent of pre-dose (ratio) (NCT01096017)
Timeframe: At two visits during a maximum of 15 days

InterventionPercentage of Pre-Dose FEV1 (Geometric Mean)
Salbutamol pMDI120.28
Terbutaline Turbuhaler®118.11

[back to top]

Maximum % Change in FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) Within 4 Hours After Drug Inhalation

percent of pre-dose (ratio) (NCT01096017)
Timeframe: At two visits during a maximum of 15 days

InterventionPercent change (Geometric Mean)
Salbutamol pMDI122.62
Terbutaline Turbuhaler®121.43

[back to top]

Number of Patients With % Change in FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) >15% Within 4 Hours After Drug Inhalation

Number of patients with % change in FEV1 >15% within 4 hours after drug inhalation. (NCT01096017)
Timeframe: At two visits during a maximum of 15 days

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Salbutamol pMDI17
Terbutaline Turbuhaler®16

[back to top]

FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 180 Minutes After Inhalations of Study Drug as Percentage of Pre-dose

percent of pre-dose (ratio) (NCT01096017)
Timeframe: At two visits during a maximum of 15 days

InterventionPercentage of Pre-Dose FEV1 (Geometric Mean)
Salbutamol pMDI116.68
Terbutaline Turbuhaler®118.48

[back to top]

Time to Peak FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) Within 4 Hours After Drug Inhalation

Time to peak measurement of FEV1 (min) (NCT01096017)
Timeframe: At two visits during a maximum of 15 days

InterventionMinutes (Median)
Salbutamol pMDI60.00
Terbutaline Turbuhaler®120.00

[back to top]

FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) Area Under Curve (AUC) 0-4 Hours After Drug Inhalation

FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second) AUC 0-4 hours after drug inhalation (NCT01096017)
Timeframe: At two visits during a maximum of 15 days. FEV1 timepoints: all time points t=5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180 and 240 minutes.

InterventionmilliLiters x minutes (Geometric Mean)
Salbutamol pMDI617.56
Terbutaline Turbuhaler®634.64

[back to top]

FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 15 Minutes After Inhalations of Study Drug as Percentage of Pre-dose

percent of pre-dose (ratio) (NCT01096017)
Timeframe: At two visits during a maximum of 15 days

InterventionPercentage of Pre-Dose FEV1 (Geometric Mean)
Salbutamol pMDI118.15
Terbutaline Turbuhaler®115.69

[back to top]

FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second) at 120 Minutes After Inhalations of Study Drug as Percentage of Pre-dose

percent of pre-dose (ratio) (NCT01096017)
Timeframe: At two visits during a maximum of 15 days

InterventionPercentage of Pre-Dose FEV1 (Geometric Mean)
Salbutamol pMDI119.54
Terbutaline Turbuhaler®119.79

[back to top]

Time to Change More Than or Equal to 15% (Time to Onset Response) Within 4 Hours After Drug Inhalation

Time to change more than or equal to 15% (time to onset response) within 4 hours after drug inhalation (NCT01096017)
Timeframe: At two visits during a maximum of 15 days

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Salbutamol pMDI31.36
Terbutaline Turbuhaler®34.32

[back to top]

Per Cent Change of Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) After Bronchodilators

Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, FRC decrements ≥10 per cent as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to O'Donnell et al. [Eur Respir J 2001; 18: 914-920]. They were calculated as follows: [FRC, expressed in liters (L), before bronchodilators - FRC (L) after bronchodilators/FRC (L) after bronchodilators x 100]. (NCT01112241)
Timeframe: Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

Interventionper cent negative change (Mean)
Responsives to bronchodilators (n=4)Unresponsives to bronchodilators (n=13)
Albuterol Plus Tiotropium162

[back to top]

Per Cent Change of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) After Bronchodilators

Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, FVC increments ≥12 per cent as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to the American Thoracic Society-European Respiratory Society standard criteria [Pellegrino et al. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 948-968]. They were calculated as follows: [FVC, expressed in liters (L), after bronchodilators - FVC (L) before bronchodilators/FVC (L) before bronchodilators x 100]. (NCT01112241)
Timeframe: Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

Interventionper cent positive change (Mean)
Responsives to bronchodilators (n=5)Unresponsives to bronchodilators (n=12)
Albuterol Plus Tiotropium242

[back to top]

Per Cent Change of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) After Bronchodilators

Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, FEV1 increments ≥12 per cent as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to the American Thoracic Society-European Respiratory Society standard criteria [Pellegrino et al. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 948-968]. They were calculated as follows: [FEV1, expressed in liters (L), after bronchodilators - FEV1 (L) before bronchodilators/FEV1 (L) before bronchodilators x 100]. (NCT01112241)
Timeframe: Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

Interventionper cent positive change (Mean)
Responsives to bronchodilators (n=4)Unresponsives to bronchodilators (n=13)
Albuterol Plus Tiotropium147

[back to top]

Absolute Change of Residual Volume (RV) After Bronchodilators

Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, RV decrements ≥0.30 liters (L) as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to O'Donnell et al. [Eur Respir J 2001; 18: 914-920]. They were calculated as follows: [RV (L), before bronchodilators - RV (L) after bronchodilators]. (NCT01112241)
Timeframe: Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

Interventionabsolute negative change (liters) (Mean)
Responsives to bronchodilators (n=8)Unresponsives to bronchodilators (n=9)
Albuterol Plus Tiotropium0.650.00

[back to top]

Absolute Change of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) After Bronchodilators

Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, FVC increments ≥0.20 liters (L) compared with baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to the American Thoracic Society-European Respiratory Society standard criteria [Pellegrino et al. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 948-968]. They were calculated as follows: [FVC (L) after bronchodilators - FVC (L) before bronchodilators]. (NCT01112241)
Timeframe: Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

Interventionabsolute positive change (liters) (Mean)
Responsives to bronchodilators (n=5)Unresponsives to bronchodilators (n=12)
Albuterol Plus Tiotropium0.650.07

[back to top]

Absolute Change of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) After Bronchodilators

Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, FEV1 increments ≥0.20 liters (L) as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to the American Thoracic Society-European Respiratory Society standard criteria [Pellegrino et al. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 948-968]. They were calculated as follows: [FEV1 (L) after bronchodilators - FEV1 (L) before bronchodilators]. (NCT01112241)
Timeframe: Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

Interventionabsolute positive change (liters) (Mean)
Responsives to bronchodilators (n=4)Unresponsives to bronchodilators (n=13)
Albuterol Plus Tiotropium0.260.12

[back to top]

Absolute Change of Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) After Bronchodilators

Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, FRC decrements ≥0.30 liters (L) as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to O'Donnell et al. [Eur Respir J 2001; 18: 914-920]. They were calculated as follows: [FRC (L), before bronchodilators - FRC (L) after bronchodilators]. (NCT01112241)
Timeframe: Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

Interventionabsolute negative change (liters) (Mean)
Responsives to bronchodilators (n=4)Unresponsives to bronchodilators (n=13)
Albuterol Plus Tiotropium0.780.07

[back to top]

Per Cent Change of Residual Volume (RV) After Bronchodilators

Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, RV decrements ≥10 per cent as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to O'Donnell et al. [Eur Respir J 2001; 18: 914-920]. They were calculated as follows: [RV, expressed in liters (L), before bronchodilators - RV (L) after bronchodilators/RV (L) after bronchodilators x 100]. (NCT01112241)
Timeframe: Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

Interventionper cent negative change (Mean)
Responsives to bronchodilators (n=8)Unresponsives to bronchodilators (n=9)
Albuterol Plus Tiotropium190

[back to top]

Per Cent Change of Partial Forced Expiratory Flow (V'Part) After Bronchodilators

Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, V'part increments ≥40 per cent as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to Pellegrino et al. [Chest 1998; 114:1607-1612]. They were calculated as follows: [V'part, expressed in liters.second-1 (L.s-1), after bronchodilators - V'part (L.s-1) before bronchodilators/V'part (L.s-1) before bronchodilators x 100]. (NCT01112241)
Timeframe: Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

Interventionper cent positive change (Mean)
Responsives to bronchodilators (n=9)Unresponsives to bronchodilators (n=8)
Albuterol Plus Tiotropium5917

[back to top]

Per Cent Change of Instantaneous Maximal Forced Expiratory Flow (V'Max) After Bronchodilators

Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, V'max increments ≥40 per cent as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to Pellegrino et al. [Chest 1998; 114:1607-1612]. They were calculated as follows: [V'max, expressed in liters.second-1 (L.s-1), after bronchodilators - V'max (L.s-1) before bronchodilators/V'max (L.s-1) before bronchodilators x 100]. (NCT01112241)
Timeframe: Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

Interventionper cent positive change (Mean)
Responsives to bronchodilators (n=4)Unresponsives to bronchodilators (n=13)
Albuterol Plus Tiotropium6614

[back to top]

Time to First Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbation Between QVA149, NVA237 and Open Label Tiotropium During the Treatment Period

"A Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) exacerbation was defined as a worsening of two or more of the following major symptoms for at least 2 consecutive days: dyspnea, sputum volume or sputum purulence OR a worsening of any 1 major symptom together with an increase in any 1 of the following minor symptoms for at least 2 consecutive days: sore throat, colds (nasal discharge and/or nasal congestion), fever without other cause, cough or wheezing. A COPD exacerbation was considered of moderate severity if treatment with systemic glucocorticosteroids or antibiotics or both was required and severe if hospitalization was required. An emergency room (ER) visit of longer than 24 hours was considered a hospitalization.~Rate of moderate or severe exacerbations per year = total number of moderate or severe exacerbations / total number of treatment years" (NCT01120691)
Timeframe: 64 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
QVA149296
NVA237287
Open-label Tiotropium331

[back to top]

Time to Study Withdrawal or Premature Discontinuation for Any Reason Between QVA149 (110/50 µg q.d.), NVA237 (50 µg q.d.) and Open Label Tiotropium (18 µg q.d.) During the Treatment Period.

Time to Study Withdrawal or Premature Discontinuation for Any Reason was analyzed for each treatment group using a Kaplan-Meier estimation for the modified safety set. Patients who did not discontinue early were censored at the final visit of the treatment phase. (NCT01120691)
Timeframe: 64 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
QVA149NA
NVA237NA
Open-label TiotropiumNA

[back to top]

Cumulative Rates of Moderate or Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations for Multiple COPD Exacerbation at Different Time Points

Cumulative rates were estimated using Anderson and Gill method. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) exacerbations are considered to be moderate if treatment with systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics was required. COPD exacerbations are considered to be severe if treatment for moderate severity and hospitalization were required. Rate of moderate or severe exacerbations per year = total number of moderate or severe exacerbations / total number of treatment years (NCT01120691)
Timeframe: 26, 52, 64, 76 weeks

,,
Interventionexacerbations per year (Number)
26 weeks52 weeks64 weeks76 weeks
NVA2370.651.131.361.59
Open-label Tiotropium0.631.111.311.55
QVA1490.570.991.191.39

[back to top]

Change in Mean Daily Use (Number of Puffs) of Rescue Therapy Between QVA149, NVA237 and Open Label Tiotropium From Baseling Over the 64 Week Treatment Period

The severe or less FEV1 % predicted (post bronchodilator)>=30%; very severe=> FEV1 % predicted(the post bronchodilator)<30%.Number of puffs of rescue medication taken in the previous 12 hours was recorded in patient diary in the morning and in the evening for 26 weeks.The total number of puffs per day was calculated and divided by the number of days with data to determine the mean daily number of puffs of rescue medication for each patient.Rescue medication data recorded during the 14 day run-in was used to calculate the baseline.A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with baseline number of puffs and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. (NCT01120691)
Timeframe: Baseline (14 day run-in), 64 weeks

,,
Intervention# puffs (Least Squares Mean)
Mean Daily # puffs Severe or Less(n=565,575,561)Mean Daily # puffs Very Severe (n=143,149,148)
NVA237-1.5-1.1
Open-label Tiotropium-1.6-1.0
QVA149-2.3-2.1

[back to top]

Pre-dose Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)After 4, 12, 26, 38, 52 and 64 Weeks of Treatment Between QVA149, NVA237 and Open Label Tiotropium

"Pulmonary function assessments were performed using centralized spirometry. The spirometer was customized and programmed according to the requirements of the study protocol in accordance with American Thoracic Society (ATS) standards.~Pre-dose Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is defined as the average of the -15 minutes and the -45 minutes FVC values. Baseline is defined as the average of the -45 minutes and -15 minutes FVC values taken on day 1 prior to first dose. FVC data taken within 6h of rescue medication or within 7 days of systemic corticosteroid is excluded from this analysis" (NCT01120691)
Timeframe: 4, 12, 26, 38, 52 and 64 weeks

,,
InterventionL (liters) (Least Squares Mean)
predose FVC Week 4 (n= 656,654,630)predose FVC Week 12 (n= 623,621,619)predose FVC Week 26 (n= 604,577,599)predose FVC Week 38 (n= 592,548,580)predose FVC Week 52 (n= 557,538,547)predose FVC Week 64 (n= 549,502,526)
NVA2372.592.632.602.652.582.57
Open-label Tiotropium2.602.652.612.632.582.59
QVA1492.742.772.732.762.682.67

[back to top]

Rate of Moderate or Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations Requiring the Use of Both Systemic Glucocorticosteroids and Antibiotics

Rate of moderate or severe exacerbations per year = total number of moderate or severe exacerbations / total number of treatment years (NCT01120691)
Timeframe: 64 weeks

Interventionexacerbations per year (Number)
QVA1490.46
NVA2370.58
Open-label Tiotropium0.54

[back to top]

St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Scores Between QVA149, NVA237 and Open Label Tiotropium Over 12, 26, 38, 52 and 64 Weeks of Treatment

St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a health related quality of life questionnaire consisting of 51 items in three components: symptoms, activity, and impacts. The lowest possible value is zero and the highest 100. Higher values correspond to greater impairment in quality of life. Mixed model used baseline SGRQ, baseline inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use, Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) prior to inhalation of short acting beta-agonist (SABA), and FEV1 45 minutes post-inhalation of SABA as covariates. SGRQ total score is the sum of the scores from the three components; symptoms, activity and impacts. (NCT01120691)
Timeframe: 12, 26, 38, 52 and 64 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n= 694,694,676)Week 26 (n= 684,677,658)Week 38 (n= 648,626,635)Week 52 (n= 625,593,613)Week 64 (n= 600,564,579)
NVA23747.1345.9345.5345.9645.46
Open-label Tiotropium47.6245.7745.8646.2146.08
QVA14944.6944.0642.7243.3843.39

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Study Withdrawal or Premature Discontinuation for Any Reason Between QVA149 (110/50 µg q.d.), NVA237 (50 µg q.d.) and Open Label Tiotropium (18 µg q.d.)During the Treatment Period

Percentage of Patients With Study Withdrawal or Premature Discontinuation for Any Reason was analyzed for each treatment group using a Kaplan-Meier estimation for the modified safety set. Patients who did not discontinue early were censored at the final visit of the treatment phase. (NCT01120691)
Timeframe: 64 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
QVA14921.8
NVA23727.3
Open-label Tiotropium24.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Percentage of Days Without Rescue Therapy Use Between QVA149,NVA237 and Open Label Tiotropium Over the 64 Week Treatment Period

A day with no rescue medication use is defined from the diary data as any day where the patient recorded no rescue medicine use during the previous 12 hours. The percentage of days is calculated by the number of days with no rescue medicine use/total number of days with evaluable data X 100. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with baseline number of puffs and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. The model also included baseline smoking status (current/ex-smoker), baseline ICS use (Yes/No) and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect. (NCT01120691)
Timeframe: Baseline (14 day run-in), 64 weeks

Interventionpercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
QVA14929.36
NVA23721.65
Open-label Tiotropium23.86

[back to top]

Rate of Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations in QVA149 and Open-label Tiotropium Treatment Arms During the Treatment Period.

"A Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) exacerbation was defined as a worsening of two or more of the following major symptoms for at least 2 consecutive days: dyspnea, sputum volume or sputum purulence OR a worsening of any 1 major symptom together with an increase in any 1 of the following minor symptoms for at least 2 consecutive days: sore throat, colds (nasal discharge and/or nasal congestion), fever without other cause, cough or wheezing. A COPD exacerbation was considered of moderate severity if treatment with systemic glucocorticosteroids or antibiotics or both was required and severe if hospitalization was required. An emergency room (ER) visit of longer than 24 hours was considered a hospitalization.~Rate of moderate or severe exacerbations per year = total number of moderate or severe exacerbations / total number of treatment years" (NCT01120691)
Timeframe: 76 weeks

InterventionExacerbations per year (Number)
QVA1490.94
Open-label Tiotropium1.06

[back to top]

Rate of Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations in QVA149 and NVA237 Treatment Arms During the Treatment Period.

"A Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) exacerbation was defined as a worsening of two or more of the following major symptoms for at least 2 consecutive days: dyspnea, sputum volume or sputum purulence OR a worsening of any 1 major symptom together with an increase in any 1 of the following minor symptoms for at least 2 consecutive days: sore throat, colds (nasal discharge and/or nasal congestion), fever without other cause, cough or wheezing. A COPD exacerbation was considered of moderate severity if treatment with systemic glucocorticosteroids or antibiotics or both was required and severe if hospitalization was required. An emergency room (ER) visit of longer than 24 hours was considered a hospitalization.~Rate of moderate or severe exacerbations per year = total number of moderate or severe exacerbations / total number of treatment years" (NCT01120691)
Timeframe: 64 weeks

InterventionExacerbations per year (Number)
QVA1490.94
NVA2371.07

[back to top]

Number of Days With Moderate or Severe Exacerbation That Required Treatment With Systemic Corticosteroids and Antibiotics

The number of exacerbation days is defined as the sum of the duration of days recorded as an exacerbation for all exacerbations recorded per patient. (NCT01120691)
Timeframe: 64 weeks

,,
InterventionDays (Mean)
systemic corticosteroids [n= 97, 108, 109]antibiotics [n= 195, 177, 177]corticosteroids and antibiotic [n= 266, 290, 270]
NVA23725.2218.1026.18
Open-label Tiotropium17.5725.9422.03
QVA14920.4925.0822.10

[back to top]

Pre-dose Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV-1) After 4, 12, 26, 38, 52 and 64 Weeks of Treatment Between QVA149, NVA237 and Open Label Tiotropium

"Pulmonary function assessments were performed using centralized spirometry. The spirometer was customized and programmed according to the requirements of the study protocol in accordance with American Thoracic Society (ATS) standards.~Spirometry measurements taken were FEV1 at -45 minutes and -15 minutes pre-dose. Three acceptable maneuvers had to be performed for each time point. The FEV1 values recorded had to be the highest values measured irrespective of whether or not they occurred on the same curve.~The mixed model for analysis contained treatment as a fixed effect with average of the 45 minutes and 15 minutes pre dose FEV1 measurements at day 1 as the baseline measurement, FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at -14 Day) as covariates." (NCT01120691)
Timeframe: 4, 12, 26, 38, 52 and 64 weeks

,,
InterventionL (liters) (Least Squares Mean)
predose FEV1 Week 4 (n= 656,654,630)predose FEV1 Week 12 (n= 666,663,653)predose FEV1 Week 26 (n= 604,577,599)predose FEV1 Week 38 (n= 593,549,583)predose FEV1 Week 52 (n= 557,538,548)predose FEV1 Week 64 (n= 549,504,530)
NVA2370.991.010.991.000.980.98
Open-label Tiotropium1.001.011.001.000.990.99
QVA1491.081.081.071.081.051.05

[back to top]

Asthma Symptoms

Subjective change in asthma symptoms on a visual-analogue scale with scores ranging from 0 (no positive change) to 10 (complete positive change). These subjective responses were then converted to percent change during the 2 hours by multiplying each score by 10. Each of these individual subject scores were then averaged to produce an average percent change in symptoms. (NCT01143688)
Timeframe: Assesed over 2 hours during each visit. There were 4 visits in each block each visit separated by 3-7 days. There were three blocks each block separated by 3-7 days.

Interventionpercent change in symptoms (Mean)
Albuterol Inhaler50
Placebo Inhaler45
Placebo Acupuncture46
No-intervention Control21

[back to top]

Change in FEV1

The baseline FEV1 (before treatment) was subtracted from the maximum FEV1 recorded during the 2 h period following treatment. This difference value was then converted into percent improvement by dividing by baseline FEV1 and multiplying by 100. Each treatment was given 3 times to each patient, so we averaged the 3 values to yield the mean percent change in FEV1 for each condition. (NCT01143688)
Timeframe: FEV1 was assessed every 20 minutes for 2 hours at each visit. There were 4 visits in each block each visit separated by 3-7 days. There were three blocks each block separated by 3-7 days.

Interventionpercentage change in FEV1 (Mean)
Albuterol Inhaler20.1
Placebo Inhaler7.5
Placebo Acupuncture7.3
No-intervention Control7.1

[back to top]

Total Number of Participants With Arrhythmias

Documented new arrhythmia occurring during study. (NCT01151579)
Timeframe: Five days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Nebulized Albuterol 2.5mg2
Levalbuterol 1.253

[back to top]

Heart Rate in Beats Per Minute

Average difference in Heart rate between pre and post breathing treatments (NCT01151579)
Timeframe: Five days

Interventionbpm (Mean)
Nebulized Albuterol 2.5mg-0.16
Levalbuterol 1.251.40

[back to top]

Arrhythmias

Any new arrhythmia documented in the medical record that occurred between breathing treatments. (NCT01151579)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after each treatment for average of 3 to 5 days

Interventionpercent (Number)
Nebulized Albuterol 2.5mg0.33
Levalbuterol 1.251.3

[back to top]

%FEV1

% predicted forced expiratory volume in 1-second as a measure of airway obstruction (NCT01196377)
Timeframe: 2 hours

,,,
Intervention%-predicted (Mean)
Baseline, pretreatment2-hours (post-treatment)
10mg/hr Pulsed3447
25mg/hr Continuous2667
25mg/hr Pulsed3144
Nebulized Albuterol 10mg/hr Continuous2041

[back to top]

Pulse at Screening and End of Study

Vital sign measurements (heart rate and blood pressure) were evaluated as part of the safety profile assessment. The participant was seated at least 2 minutes before vital signs were performed. Heart rate was measured by radial pulse. (NCT01218009)
Timeframe: Days -15 to -8 (Screening), up to Day 49 (End of study)

,
Interventionbeats/minute (Mean)
Screening (n=166, 165)End of study (n=164, 164)
Albuterol Spiromax71.072.1
Placebo Spiromax71.873.0

[back to top]

Blood Pressure at Screening and End of Study

Vital sign measurements (heart rate and blood pressure) were evaluated as part of the safety profile assessment. The participant was seated at least 2 minutes before vital signs were performed. Either an electronic or manual sphygmomanometer was used. (NCT01218009)
Timeframe: Days -15 to -8 (Screening), up to Day 49 (End of study)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Screening Diastolic BP (n=166, 165)End of Study Diastolic BP (n=164, 164)Screening Systolic BP (n=166, 165)End of Study Systolic BP (n=164, 164)
Albuterol Spiromax75.575.7119.4118.4
Placebo Spiromax75.275.2118.0118.2

[back to top]

Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

Adverse events (AEs) summarized in this table are those that began or worsened after treatment with study drug (treatment-emergent AEs). An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. (NCT01218009)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 49 (study termination)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventTreatment-related adverse eventWithdrawn from study due to adverse eventSerious adverse eventTreatment-related serious adverse eventMild adverse eventModerate adverse eventSevere adverse eventAE class: Infections and infestationsAE class: Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinalAE class: GastrointestinalAE class: Nervous systemAE class: Injury, poisoning and procedural compliAE class: InvestigationsAE class: Musculoskeletal and connective tissueAE class: Renal and urinaryAE class: Ear and labyrinthAE class: Skin and subcutaneous tissueAE class: General and administrative site conditiAE class: PsychiatricAE class: Social circumstancesAE class: CardiacAE class: EyeAE class: Blood and lymphatic systemNeoplasm benign, malignant + unspecified
Albuterol Spiromax593010293523112974322221110000
Placebo Spiromax583010322943411562341101102111

[back to top]

Airway Distensibility With Lung Inflation After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)

We studied 26 subjects, 2 weeks before and 2 months after HSCT. Within-breath respiratory system conductance (Grs) at 5, 11 and 19 Hz was measured by forced oscillation technique (FOT) at functional residual capacity (FRC) and total lung capacity (TLC) (NCT01255449)
Timeframe: 2 weeks before and 2 months after HSCT

Intervention1/cmH2O*s (Mean)
Airway Distensibility With Lung Inflation After HSCT0.07

[back to top]

Post-HSCT Changes in Lung Tissue Density

Changes in lung tissue density were measured by quantitative computed tomography(CT) scan 2 weeks before and 2 months after HSCT (NCT01255449)
Timeframe: Before and 2 months after HSCT

Interventiong/mL (Mean)
Post-HSCT Changes in Lung Tissue Density0.03

[back to top]

Maximum, Minimum and Average Changes in Diastolic Blood Pressure

Diastolic blood pressure was measured using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) recorded every 15 minutes during the daytime (0600 through 2200 hours) and every hour throughout the night time (2200 through 0600 hours) on Days 1, 3, and 5 of each period. Baseline diastolic blood pressure was the average of 15-minute readings taken over 2 hours prior to dosing on Day 1 of each period. Postdose diastolic blood pressure from ABPM was summarized over 1-hour increments using the average of the 15-minute readings within these intervals. The postdose diastolic blood pressure for a day was the average diastolic blood pressure for 24 hours. The least squares (LS) mean change from baseline diastolic blood pressure is reported. LS mean was calculated using a mixed effects model and adjusted for participant, sequence, period, time, treatment, and time by treatment interaction. (NCT01263197)
Timeframe: Period 1, 2, 3: Baseline, Days 1 and 3 and 5 (postdose every 15 minutes from 0600 hours through 2200 hours and every hour from 2200 hours through 0600 hours)

,,,,,
Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mm Hg) (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1 Maximum ChangeDay 1 Minimum ChangeDay 1 Average ChangeDay 3 Maximum ChangeDay 3 Minimum ChangeDay 3 Average ChangeDay 5 Maximum ChangeDay 5 Minimum ChangeDay 5 Average
Albuterol10.8-19.9-3.2711.8-21.5-3.1012.8-21.6-3.17
LY2216684 (Group 1)13.4-17.3-0.67413.6-18.1-0.53713.8-17.00.233
LY2216684 (Group 2)14.9-17.90.48115.4-17.80.61913.1-19.1-0.631
LY2216684+Albuterol12.2-16.2-0.87312.7-18.6-0.15914.7-20.5-0.140
LY2216684+Propranolol10.6-17.6-1.4412.5-18.8-1.2013.8-21.0-1.80
Propranolol8.16-26.7-7.476.87-26.6-7.806.58-26.6-7.33

[back to top]

Maximum, Minimum and Average Changes in Heart Rate

Using a Holter monitor, heart rate was recorded every 10 minutes through 24 hours postdose on Days 1, 3, and 5 of each period. Baseline heart rate was the average of 10-minute readings taken over 2 hours prior to dosing on Day 1 of each period. Postdose heart rate was summarized over 1-hour increments using the average of the 10-minute readings within these intervals. The postdose heart rate for a day was the average heart rate for 24 hours. The least squares (LS) mean change from baseline heart rate is reported. LS mean was calculated using a mixed effects model and adjusted for participant, sequence, period, time, treatment, and time by treatment interaction. (NCT01263197)
Timeframe: Period 1, 2, 3: Baseline, Days 1 and 3 and 5 (postdose every 10 minutes through 24 hours postdose)

,,,,,
Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1 Maximum ChangeDay 1 Minimum ChangeDay 1 Average ChangeDay 3 Maximum ChangeDay 3 Minimum ChangeDay 3 Average ChangeDay 5 Maximum ChangeDay 5 Minimum ChangeDay 5 Average Change
Albuterol15.7-15.2-0.78819.7-16.30.10219.9-16.31.05
LY2216684 (Group 1)33.4-9.239.3336.3-7.0512.640.4-9.4714.6
LY2216684 (Group 2)31.1-5.819.5537.2-5.9414.236.9-5.2115.0
LY2216684+Albuterol35.7-9.0310.937.2-9.7614.339.3-7.2715.7
LY2216684+Propranolol17.2-10.41.1127.3-9.406.0126.3-9.466.25
Propranolol9.41-14.8-3.9415.2-16.1-4.3414.0-15.4-3.65

[back to top]

Maximum, Minimum and Average Changes in Systolic Blood Pressure

Systolic blood pressure was measured using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) recorded every 15 minutes during the daytime (0600 through 2200 hours) and every hour throughout the night time (2200 through 0600 hours) on Days 1, 3, and 5 of each period. Baseline systolic blood pressure was the average of 15-minute readings taken over 2 hours prior to dosing on Day 1 of each period. Postdose systolic blood pressure from ABPM was summarized over 1-hour increments using the average of the 15-minute readings within these intervals. The postdose systolic blood pressure for a day was the average systolic blood pressure for 24 hours. The least squares (LS) mean change from baseline systolic blood pressure is reported. LS mean was calculated using a mixed effects model and adjusted for participant, sequence, period, time, treatment, and time by treatment interaction. (NCT01263197)
Timeframe: Period 1, 2, 3: Baseline, Days 1 and 3 and 5 (postdose every 15 minutes from 0600 hours through 2200 hours and every hour from 2200 hours through 0600 hours)

,,,,,
Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mm Hg) (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1 Maximum ChangeDay 1 Minimum ChangeDay 1 Average ChangeDay 3 Maximum ChangeDay 3 Minimum ChangeDay 3 Average ChangeDay 5 Maximum ChangeDay 5 Minimum ChangeDay 5 Average Change
Albuterol15.2-20.5-0.91215.6-24.9-1.8715.9-22.1-2.36
LY2216684 (Group 1)14.1-18.0-0.98613.5-19.4-1.6513.9-20.8-2.07
LY2216684 (Group 2)17.3-17.71.7315.3-18.50.28914.7-21.1-1.72
LY2216684+Albuterol15.8-15.31.6913.5-20.6-1.9916.2-18.9-0.233
LY2216684+Propranolol10.9-17.5-1.3511.2-23.3-3.9113.1-21.2-2.55
Propranolol9.39-29.0-8.507.99-27.2-8.7511.1-24.9-6.83

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (5-question Version [ACQ-5]) to Week 12

ACQ-5 questionnaire is a validated questionnaire comprising of 5 questions for asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath, and wheeze. Participants were asked to rate their asthma symptoms during the previous week on a 7-point scale as 0=no impairment, 6=maximum impairment. ACQ-5 score is the mean of the 5 questions and range between 0 (disease totally controlled) and 6 (disease severely uncontrolled), a higher score indicated lower asthma control. (NCT01312961)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo (for Dupilumab)-0.50
Dupilumab 300 mg qw-1.07

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow in One Second (FEV1) to Week 12

FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. (NCT01312961)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionLiters (Mean)
Placebo-0.12
Dupilumab 300 mg qw0.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Scores to Week 12

PM (post meridiem) symptom scoring system rates were participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the day. It ranges from 0 to 4 as: 0=very well, no asthma symptoms, 1=one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness, 2=more than one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness without interference of normal activities, 3=wheezing, cough, or breathlessness most of the day, which interfered to some extent with normal activities, 4=asthma very bad, unable to carry out daily activities as usual. (NCT01312961)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo (for Dupilumab)0.1
Dupilumab 300 mg qw-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score to Week 12

The SNOT-22 is a validated measure of health related quality of life in sinonasal disease. It is a 22 item questionnaire with each item assigned a score ranging from 0-5. The total score may range from 0 (no disease) -110 (worst disease), lower scores represent better health related quality of life. (NCT01312961)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo (for Dupilumab)1.27
Dupilumab 300 mg qw-9.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Scores to Week 12

AM (ante meridiem) symptom scoring system rates were participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the night. It ranges from 0 to 4 as: 0 = No asthma symptoms, slept through the night, 1= Slept well, but some complaints in the morning. No nighttime awakenings,2= Woke up once because of asthma (including early awakening),3= Woke up several times because of asthma (including early awakening), 4= Bad night, awake most of the night because of asthma. (NCT01312961)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo (for Dupilumab)0.3
Dupilumab 300 mg qw-0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Albuterol or Levalbuterol to Week 12

Number of Albuterol or Levalbuterol inhalations were recorded daily by the participants in their electronic diary as Albuterol or Levalbuterol was to be used only as needed for symptoms, not on a regular basis or prophylactically. (NCT01312961)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionnumber of inhalations/day (Mean)
Placebo (for Dupilumab)0.4
Dupilumab 300 mg qw-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Day to Week 12

Participants recorded every morning on awakening the number of asthma-related nocturnal awakenings requiring use of rescue medication that occurred during the previous night. (NCT01312961)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionnumber of awakenings/day (Mean)
Placebo (for Dupilumab)0.1
Dupilumab 300 mg qw-0.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Composite Asthma Events

Composite asthma event was defined as a 30% or greater reduction from baseline in morning PEF on 2 consecutive days together with 6 or more additional reliever puffs of albuterol or levalbuterol in a 24-hour period (compared to baseline) on 2 consecutive days. (NCT01312961)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo (for Dupilumab)1.9
Dupilumab 300 mg qw0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Asthma Exacerbation

An asthma exacerbation was defined as the occurrence of any of the following: ≥30% reduction from baseline in morning PEF on 2 consecutive days; or ≥6 additional reliever puffs of albuterol or levalbuterol in a 24-hour period (compared to baseline) on 2 consecutive days; or deterioration of asthma, as determined by the investigator, requiring systemic steroid treatment, or an increase in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) of ≥4 times the last dose received prior to discontinuation from the study, or hospitalization. The occurrence of asthma exacerbations by individual criteria are reported. (NCT01312961)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Asthma exacerbation≥30% reduction from baseline in morning PEF≥6additional albuterol/levalbuterol puffsSystemic steroid treatmentIncrease in ICS ≥4 times baseline dose of ICSHospitalization
Dupilumab 300 mg qw5.81.91.91.90.00.0
Placebo (for Dupilumab)44.219.219.29.65.80.0

[back to top]

Time to First Asthma Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12

The time-to-asthma exacerbation was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first asthma exacerbation event; for participants without asthma exacerbation, it was censored at the end of treatment visit date. The median time to first asthma exacerbation was not estimated because the number of asthma exacerbations was too low in the Dupilumab arm. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of asthma exacerbation at Week 4, 8 and 12, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics. (NCT01312961)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 12

,
InterventionProbability of asthma exacerbation (Number)
Probability at Week 4Probability at Week 8Probability at Week 12
Dupilumab 300 mg qw0.0380.0580.058
Placebo (for Dupilumab)0.0580.2450.460

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) to Week 12

The PEF is a participant's maximum speed of expiration, as measured with a peak flow meter. Peak flow testing for PEF was performed at home (morning and evening) while sitting or standing prior to using any medication (if needed) for asthma. (NCT01312961)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionliters/minute (Mean)
Change in morning PEFChange in evening PEF
Dupilumab 300 mg qw10.6-3.4
Placebo (for Dupilumab)-11.2-15.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Flow 25-75%

Forced expiratory flow 25-75% (FEF25-75%) is the flow (or speed) of air coming out of the lung during the middle half of a forced expiration. Pulmonary function testing was performed using centralized spirometry prior to taking study medication. Change from baseline over 24 weeks of treatment was calculated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, baseline value, time and a treatment-by-time interaction as independent variables. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionliters/second (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast0.023
Placebo-0.010

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in First Second (FEV1)

FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using centralized spirometry prior to taking study medication. Change from baseline over 24 weeks of treatment was calculated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, baseline value of pre-bronchodilator FEV1, time and a treatment-by-time interaction as independent variables. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast0.049
Placebo-0.022

[back to top]

Time to Onset of First Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbation

Time to onset of a COPD exacerbation is defined as onset date of COPD exacerbation - date of first intake of study drug + 1 day. COPD exacerbations were categorized as follows: - Severe: Requiring hospitalization and/or leading to death; - Moderate: Requiring oral or parenteral glucocorticosteroid therapy. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
Roflumilast67.0
Placebo86.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in First Three Seconds (FEV3)

FEV3 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first three seconds of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using centralized spirometry prior to taking study medication. Change from baseline over 24 weeks of treatment was calculated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, baseline value of pre-bronchodilator FEV3, time and a treatment-by-time interaction as independent variables. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast0.072
Placebo-0.030

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

Vital capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Pulmonary function testing was performed using centralized spirometry prior to taking study medication. Change from baseline over 24 weeks of treatment was calculated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, baseline value, time and a treatment-by-time interaction as independent variables. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast0.100
Placebo-0.009

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Post-bronchodilator FEV1

FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using centralized spirometry prior to taking study medication. Post-bronchodilator measurements were taken 30 minutes after four inhalations of 100 μg salbutamol. Change from baseline over 24 weeks of treatment was calculated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, baseline value of post-bronchodilator FEV1, time and a treatment-by-time interaction as independent variables. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast0.045
Placebo-0.023

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations

A COPD exacerbation is an event characterised by a worsening in the patient's baseline dyspnoea, or cough and/or sputum beyond day-to-day variability sufficient to warrant a change in management, and may be accompanied by increased wheeze, chest tightness, purulent sputum and symptoms of cold and/or fatigue. COPD exacerbations were categorized as follows: - Severe: Requiring hospitalization and/or leading to death; - Moderate: Requiring oral or parenteral glucocorticosteroid therapy. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
No exacerbationsOne exacerbationTwo exacerbationsThree exacerbations
Placebo84.712.81.90.6
Roflumilast81.815.02.60.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in First Six Seconds (FEV6)

FEV6 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first six seconds of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using centralized spirometry prior to taking study medication. Change from baseline over 24 weeks of treatment was calculated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, baseline value of pre-bronchodilator FEV6, time and a treatment-by-time interaction as independent variables. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast0.084
Placebo-0.031

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Post-bronchodilator Ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume After 1 Second to Forced Vital Capacity

The FEV1/FVC ratio represents the percentage of vital capacity expelled from the lungs during the first second of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using centralized spirometry prior to taking study medication. Post-bronchodilator measurements were taken 30 minutes after four inhalations of 100 μg salbutamol. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercent FEV1/FVC (Median)
Roflumilast-0.320
Placebo-0.940

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant regardless of causal relationship to study drug and regardless whether study drug has been administered. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability / incapacity, is a congenital anomaly / birth defect or is medically important due to other reasons than the above mentioned criteria. A non-serious AE is any AE that does not meet the criteria above. Each AE was assessed by the Investigator as either 'related' or 'not related' to study drug. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
All AEsNon-serious AEsSerious AEs (including death)DeathSerious AEs not including deathAEs with suggested relationship to trial treatmentAEs leading to withdrawal from the trialAEs not recovered at trial terminationAEs with changes in concomitant medication
Placebo1961724824618245155
Roflumilast21318962260651554164

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in COPD Symptom Scores

Symptoms of chronic bronchitis with respect to cough and sputum production were assessed daily by the patient and recorded in a diary. Symptoms were assessed on a 4-point scale as follows: Cough: 0: no cough; 1: mild cough (at some time during the day); 2: moderate cough (regularly during the day); 3: severe cough (never free of cough or feeling free of need to cough). Sputum production: 0: no sputum production (unnoticeable); 1: mild sputum production (noticeable as a problem); 2: moderate sputum production (frequent inconvenience); 3: severe sputum production (constant problem). Change from Baseline is reported for cough and sputum separately, and for the sum of the 2 scores (range 0 - 6). Least squares means (LSM) are from a repeated measures ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, time and a treatment-by-time interaction as independent variables. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Score Sum (n=282, 296)Cough (n=284, 299)Sputum (n=284, 296)
Placebo0.0640.0360.037
Roflumilast0.013-0.0190.035

[back to top]

Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Total Score at Week 24

"The TDI is a recognized questionnaire to measure dyspnoea (shortness of breath) in patients with COPD. Questions from the TDI were used to assess the 3 components: change in functional impairment, change in magnitude of task and change in magnitude of effort. Transitions or changes from baseline are rated from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement), and summed to give a total score ranging from -9 to +9. Least squares means (LSM) are from a repeated measures ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, time and a treatment-by-time interaction as independent variables." (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast1.335
Placebo1.396

[back to top]

Time to Onset of Second Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbation

Time to onset of a COPD exacerbation is defined as onset date of COPD exacerbation - date of first intake of study drug + 1 day. At least 10 days between the stop date of an exacerbation and the start date of the following exacerbation was required for these to be be considered as two separate COPD exacerbations. COPD exacerbations were categorized as follows: - Severe: Requiring hospitalization and/or leading to death; - Moderate: Requiring oral or parenteral glucocorticosteroid therapy. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
Roflumilast119.5
Placebo117.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Flow 25-75%

Forced expiratory flow 25-75% (FEF25-75%) is the flow (or speed) of air coming out of the lung during the middle half of a forced expiration. Pulmonary function testing was performed using centralized spirometry prior to taking study medication. Post-bronchodilator measurements were taken 30 minutes after four inhalations of 100 μg salbutamol. Change from baseline over 24 weeks of treatment was calculated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, baseline value, time and a treatment-by-time interaction as independent variables. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionliters/second (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast0.022
Placebo-0.008

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEF)

PEF is the maximal flow (or speed) achieved during the maximally forced expiration initiated at full inspiration. Pulmonary function testing was performed using centralized spirometry prior to taking study medication. Change from baseline over 24 weeks of treatment was calculated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, baseline value, time and a treatment-by-time interaction as independent variables. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast0.096
Placebo-0.036

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume After 1 Second to Forced Expiratory Volume After 6 Seconds

The FEV1/FEV6 ratio represents the percentage of the volume of air expired in the first six seconds that is expelled from the lungs during the first second of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using centralized spirometry prior to taking study medication. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercentage of FEV1/FEV6 (Median)
Roflumilast-0.210
Placebo-0.950

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume After 1 Second to Forced Vital Capacity

The FEV1/FVC ratio represents the percentage of vital capacity expelled from the lungs during the first second of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using centralized spirometry prior to taking study medication. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercent FEV1/FVC (Median)
Roflumilast-0.570
Placebo-1.370

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Use of Rescue Medication

Salbutamol (given by metered dose inhaler and spacer) was used as rescue medication according to the individual needs of a patient. Each use was documented in the patient's paper diary. Least squares means (LSM) are from a repeated measures ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, time and a treatment-by-time interaction as independent variables. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionpuffs/day (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast-0.485
Placebo-0.518

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Post-bronchodilator Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEF)

PEF is the maximal flow (or speed) achieved during the maximally forced expiration initiated at full inspiration. Pulmonary function testing was performed using centralized spirometry prior to taking study medication. Post-bronchodilator measurements were taken 30 minutes after four inhalations of 100 μg salbutamol. Change from baseline over 24 weeks of treatment was calculated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, baseline value, time and a treatment-by-time interaction as independent variables. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast0.099
Placebo-0.030

[back to top]

Mean Rate of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations Per Patient Per Year

The mean rate of COPD exacerbations per patient per year rate = (number of exacerbations per treatment group/time to study withdrawal per treatment group) * 365. COPD exacerbations were categorized as follows: - Severe: Requiring hospitalization and/or leading to death; - Moderate: Requiring oral or parenteral glucocorticosteroid therapy. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionexacerbations per patient per year (Number)
Roflumilast0.55
Placebo0.44

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in First Six Seconds (FEV6)

FEV6 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first three seconds of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using centralized spirometry prior to taking study medication. Post-bronchodilator measurements were taken 30 minutes after four inhalations of 100 μg salbutamol. Change from baseline over 24 weeks of treatment was calculated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, baseline value of post-bronchodilator FEV6, time and a treatment-by-time interaction as independent variables. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast0.078
Placebo-0.032

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in First Three Seconds (FEV3)

FEV3 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first three seconds of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using centralized spirometry prior to taking study medication. Post-bronchodilator measurements were taken 30 minutes after four inhalations of 100 μg salbutamol. Change from baseline over 24 weeks of treatment was calculated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, baseline value of post-bronchodilator FEV3, time and a treatment-by-time interaction as independent variables. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast0.064
Placebo-0.030

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Post-bronchodilator Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

Vital capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Pulmonary function testing was performed using centralized spirometry prior to taking study medication. Post-bronchodilator measurements were taken 30 minutes after four inhalations of 100 μg salbutamol. Change from baseline over 24 weeks of treatment was calculated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, baseline value, time and a treatment-by-time interaction as independent variables. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast0.094
Placebo-0.007

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Post-bronchodilator Ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume After 1 Second to Forced Expiratory Volume After 6 Seconds

The FEV1/FEV6 ratio represents the percentage of the volume of air expired in the first six seconds that is expelled from the lungs during the first second of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using centralized spirometry prior to taking study medication. Post-bronchodilator measurements were taken 30 minutes after four inhalations of 100 μg salbutamol. (NCT01313494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercentage of FEV1/FEV6 (Mean)
Roflumilast-0.340
Placebo-0.420

[back to top]

Hospital Admission

Hospital admission was defined as the need to stay in the emergency room for more than 4 hours, due to the failure to meet the discharge criteria (PRAM score ≤ 3 and pulse oximetry, ≥ 92%) (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: Starting at 4 hours post-treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)11
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)8

[back to top]

Lengths of Stay in the Emergency Room

lengths of stay in the emergency room for discharged patients (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: one to four hours

Interventionhours (Median)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)1.50
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)1.40

[back to top]

Need for Additional Therapies

The need for additional therapies such as magnesium sulphate or intravenous albuterol were recorded (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: at discharge or admission (up to 4 hours post treatment, minimum 1 hour, maximum 4 hours post treatment)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)0
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)0

[back to top]

Change in Pulse Oximetry One Hour Post-treatment

Change in pulse oximetry one hour post-treatment in comparison with baseline (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: One hour post-treatment in comparison with baseline

Interventionpercentage of oxygen saturation (Mean)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)1.54
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)1.39

[back to top]

Admission Rates in Patients With and Without Any Virus Detected

Admission rates in patients with and without any of the following viruses detected by PCR in nasal lavage samples: Adenovirus; Bocavirus; Coronavirus; Enterovirus (Echovirus); Influenza (A H3N2, A H1N1/2009, B and C); Metapneumovirus (subtypes A and B); Parainfluenza 1, 2, 3 and 4 (subtypes A and B); Rhinovirus; Respiratory Syncytial Virus type A and Respiratory Syncytial Virus type B. (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: at discharge or admission (up to 4 hours post treatment, minimum 1 hour, maximum 4 hours post treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Virus Detected12.3
No Virus Detected22.7

[back to top]

Admission Rates in Patients With and Without Rhinovirus Detect

Admission rates in patients with and without rhinovirus detected by PCR in nasal lavage samples. (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: at discharge or admission (up to 4 hours post treatment, minimum 1 hour, maximum 4 hours post treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rhinovirus Detected10.2
No Rhinovirus Detected20.6

[back to top]

Admission Rates in Patients With the Arg16Gly Polymorphisms

Admission rates in patients with the Arg16Gly polymorphisms of the beta-2 adrenergic receptor (Arg16Gly, Arg16Arg and Gly16Gly genotypes). (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: at discharge or admission (up to 4 hours post treatment, minimum 1 hour, maximum 4 hours post treatment)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arg16Gly Patients1
Gly16Gly Patients1
Arg16Arg Patients7

[back to top]

Albuterol Determination in the Plasma

Albuterol determination in the plasma was carried out at at discharge or hospital admission (up to 4 hours post treatment), dosage was accomplished by High Performance Liquid Chromatography. (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: at discharge or admission (up to 4 hours post treatment, minimum 1 hour, maximum 4 hours post treatment)

Interventionng/ml (Median)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)2.57
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)1.08

[back to top]

Change in PRAM Score After One Hour

"Change in the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score one hour post-treatment in comparison with baseline.~The PRAM score is used to assess the severity of asthma attacks, it ranges from 0 to 15, and the higher the score, the greater the severity of the attack.~We calculated the difference between the PRAM score measured one hour post treatment and the PRAM score at baseline (PRAM score 1 hour - PRAM score baseline).~The larger the absolute value of the difference, the better the outcome (e.g., a difference of -4 indicates a better outcome that a difference of -2).~minimum value of the difference (Albuterol - Higher Dose, experimental group): -8 maximum value of the difference (Albuterol - Higher Dose, experimental group): 0~minimum value of the difference (Albuterol - Lower Dose, control group): -8 maximum value of the difference (Albuterol - Lower Dose, control group): 0" (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: One hour post-treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)-3
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)-4

[back to top]

Changes in Bicarbonate Serum Levels

Changes in bicarbonate serum levels at discharge or hospital admission (up to 4 hours post treatment) in comparison with baseline. (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: at discharge or admission (up to 4 hours post treatment, minimum 1 hour, maximum 4 hours post treatment) in comparison with baseline.

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)-1.75
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)-1.44

[back to top]

Changes in Glucose Serum Levels

Changes in glucose serum levels at discharge or hospital admission (up to 4 hours post treatment) in comparison with baseline. (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: at discharge or admission (up to 4 hours post treatment, minimum 1 hour, maximum 4 hours post treatment) in comparison with baseline.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)34.73
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)22.90

[back to top]

Changes in Heart Rate After One Hour

Change in heart rate one hour post-treatment in comparison with baseline. (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: One hour post-treatment in comparison with baseline

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)1.75
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)-1.47

[back to top]

Changes in Heart Rate at Discharge or Hospital Admission

Changes in heart rate at discharge or hospital admission (up to 4 hours post treatment) in comparison with baseline. (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: at discharge or admission (up to 4 hours post treatment, minimum 1 hour, maximum 4 hours post treatment)

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)-0.263
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)-0.65

[back to top]

Changes in Potassium Serum Levels

Changes in potassium serum levels at discharge or hospital admission (up to 4 hours post treatment) in comparison with baseline. (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: at discharge or admission (up to 4 hours post treatment, minimum 1 hour, maximum 4 hours post treatment) in comparison with baseline.

InterventionmEq/L (Mean)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)-0.38
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)-0.59

[back to top]

Changes in PRAM Score at Discharge or Hospital Admission

"Change in the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score at discharge or hospital admission (up to 4 hours post treatment) in comparison with baseline.~The PRAM score is used to assess the severity of asthma attacks, it ranges from 0 to 15, and the higher the score, the greater the severity of the attack.~We calculated the difference between the PRAM score measured at discharge or admission and the PRAM score at baseline (PRAM score discharge or admission - PRAM score baseline).~The larger the absolute value of the difference, the better the outcome (e.g., a difference of -4 indicates a better outcome that a difference of -2).~minimum value of the difference (Albuterol - Higher Dose, experimental group): -9 maximum value of the difference (Albuterol - Higher Dose, experimental group): 0~minimum value of the difference (Albuterol - Lower Dose, control group): -9 maximum value of the difference (Albuterol - Lower Dose, control group): 1" (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: at discharge or admission (up to 4 hours post treatment, minimum 1 hour, maximum 4 hours post treatment) in comparison with baseline.

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)-4.5
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)-5

[back to top]

Changes in Pulse Oximetry at Discharge or Hospital Admission.

Changes in pulse oximetry at discharge or hospital admission (up to 4 hours post treatment) in comparison with baseline. (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: at discharge or admission (up to 4 hours post treatment, minimum 1 hour, maximum 4 hours post treatment) in comparison with baseline.

Interventionpercentage of oxygen saturation (Mean)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)2.14
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)1.59

[back to top]

Changes in Respiratory Rate After One Hour

Change in respiratory rate one hour post-treatment in comparison with baseline. (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: One hour post-treatment in comparison with baseline

Interventionbreaths per minute (Mean)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)-2.08
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)-4.31

[back to top]

Changes in Respiratory Rate at at Discharge or Hospital Admission.

Changes in respiratory rate at discharge or hospital admission (up to 4 hours post treatment) in comparison with baseline. (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: at discharge or admission (up to 4 hours post treatment, minimum 1 hour, maximum 4 hours post treatment) in comparison with baseline.

Interventionbreaths per minute (Mean)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)-2.92
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)-5.76

[back to top]

Electrocardiogram at Baseline

Electrocardiogram performed at baseline (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: at baseline

Interventionparticipants with ECG abnormalities (Number)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)0
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)0

[back to top]

Electrocardiogram at Discharge or Hospital Admission

Electrocardiogram at discharge or hospital admission to identify possible rhythm disturbances. (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: at discharge or admission (up to 4 hours post treatment, minimum 1 hour, maximum 4 hours post treatment)

Interventionparticipants with ECG abnormalities (Number)
Experimental Group0
Control Group0

[back to top]

Electrocardiogram One Hour Post-treatment.

Electrocardiogram one hour post-treatment to identify possible rhythm disturbances. (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: One hour post-treatment

Interventionparticipants with ECG abnormalities (Number)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)0
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)0

[back to top]

Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second

Change in FEV1 one hour post-treatment in comparison with baseline. Spirometry was performed only in subjects older than 6 years and who could perform the maneuver properly. (NCT01323010)
Timeframe: One hour post-treatment in comparison with baseline

Interventionpercentage of predicted (Mean)
Albuterol - Higher Dose (Experimental)14.67
Albuterol - Lower Dose (Control)11.3

[back to top]

Time to Onset on Treatment Day 1

Time to onset on Treatment Day 1 is defined as the time to an increase of 100 milliliters (mL) from Baseline in FEV1. Time to onset was calculated over 0 to 4 hours (5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 120 min, and 240 min) post-dose. (NCT01323621)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1

InterventionMinutes (Median)
FSC 250/50 µg BID30
FF/VI 100/25 µg QD16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Trough in 24-Hour Weighted Mean FEV1 on Treatment Day 84

Pulmonary function was measured by forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. The weighted mean was calculated from the pre-dose FEV1 and the post-dose FEV1 measurements at 5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes (min) and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 13, 14, 16, 20, and 24 hours post-dose on Treatment Day 84. Baseline trough FEV1 was calculated as the mean of the two assessments made 30 and 5 minutes pre-dose on Treatment Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the average of the Day 84 values minus the Baseline value. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was conducted with covariates for country, smoking status, reversibility, and Baseline FEV1. (NCT01323621)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 84

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
FSC 250/50 µg BID0.114
FF/VI 100/25 µg QD0.142

[back to top]

Average Annual Adjusted Post-Index COPD-Related Costs

Medical costs are associated with COPD-related medical care (claims submitted with a primary International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis of COPD) and pharmaceutical care (treatment arm medications, oral corticosteroids, oral antibiotics, short-acting beta-agonists, long-acting beta-agonists [LABA], inhaled corticosteroids [ICS], ICS/LABA combinations, etc.. Means are adjusted for age, sex, geographic region, pre-initial treatment comorbidities, and COPD-related utilization. Total costs are the sum of medical care and pharmacy costs. (NCT01331694)
Timeframe: Incurred over the 12 month period after initial treatment arm prescription

,,
InterventionUnited States dollars (Mean)
MedicalPharmacyTotal
Cost Population: FSC10769722068
Cost Population: IP24816142841
Cost Population: TIO14199852408

[back to top]

Time to First Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Event

The first COPD event occurring after 30 days from initial treatment arm prescription was measured. Four categories of COPD events were analyzed; either a hospitalization or emergency department visit; an emergency department visit; an outpatient visit followed by an oral corticosteroid prescription claim within 10 days; an outpatient visit followed by an oral antibiotic prescription claim within 10 days. (NCT01331694)
Timeframe: Anytime from 30 days to 12 months after initial treatment arm prescription

,,
Interventiondays (Mean)
Hospitalization or emergency department visitEmergency department visitOutpatient visit with oral steroid fillOutpatient visit with antibiotic fill
Risk Population TIO321.59328.48331.23326.70
Risk Population: FSC325.17330.24332.74329.96
Risk Population: IP315.89324.47328.23326.73

[back to top]

Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6) on Day 85

"FEV1 AUC 0-6 is the area under the effect-time curve from time 0 (pre-dose) up to 6 hours post-dose. The baseline was the average of the 2 pre-dose FEV1 measurements on that study day. The baseline-adjustment refers to change from baseline at each post dose timepoint recorded on Day 85.~FEV1 was measured using spirometry. Spirometry assessments were obtained predose at -30 ± 5, and - 5 minutes, then post dose at 5 ± 2, 15 ± 5, 30 ± 5, 45 ± 5 minutes, and at 1hr ± 5 min, 2hr ± 5 min, 3hr ± 5 min, 4hr ± 5 min, 5hr ± 5 min, and 6hr ± 5 min." (NCT01424813)
Timeframe: Day 85

InterventionL*hr (Mean)
Placebo MDPI0.06
Albuterol MDPI0.74

[back to top]

Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6) Over the 12-week Treatment Period

"FEV1 AUC 0-6 is the area under the effect-time curve from time 0 (pre-dose) up to 6 hours post-dose. It represents the weighted average (by the trapezoidal rule) of FEV1 AUC 0-6 measures adjusted for the baseline measure (i.e., change from baseline at each timepoint) recorded on days 1, 8 and 85 of the treatment period. The baseline for each study day was the average of the 2 pre-dose FEV1 measurements on that study day.~FEV1 was measured using spirometry. Spirometry assessments were obtained predose at -30 ± 5, and - 5 minutes, then post dose at 5 ± 2, 15 ± 5, 30 ± 5, 45 ± 5 minutes, and at 1hr ± 5 min, 2hr ± 5 min, 3hr ± 5 min, 4hr ± 5 min, 5hr ± 5 min, and 6hr ± 5 min." (NCT01424813)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 85

InterventionL*hr (Mean)
Placebo MDPI0.28
Albuterol MDPI1.11

[back to top]

Participants With Adverse Events

Adverse events (AEs) summarized in this table are those that began or worsened after treatment with study drug (treatment-emergent AEs). An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. (NCT01424813)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 92

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventSevere adverse eventsTreatment-related AEDeathsOther serious AEsWithdrawn from study due to AEs
Albuterol MDPI2211000
Placebo MDPI2511000

[back to top]

Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Assessments

"For both standard and serial vital signs, participants were seated for at least 5 minutes before vital signs were assessed. Heart rate was obtained prior to the blood pressure measurement. Serial heart rate and blood pressure were conducted in the sitting position prior to the spirometry assessment; baseline measures were taken pre-dose at -30 ± 5 and -5 minutes on Day 1. Day 85 serial vital sign measures were taken in the sitting position prior to spirometry assessments pre-dose at -30 ± 5 and -5 minutes, then post-dose at 30 (±5) minutes, 1hr (± 10 min), 2hr (± 10 min), 3hr (± 10 min), 4hr (± 10 min), 5hr (± 10 min) and 6 hr (± 10 min).~Serial heart rate and blood pressure measurements that were elevated to the following criteria were considered clinically significant:~Systolic blood pressure: > 160 beats/minute Diastolic blood pressure: >100 beats/minute Heart rate: >120 beats/minute" (NCT01424813)
Timeframe: Day 8, Day 85

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Systolic blood pressure - highDiastolic blood pressure - highHeart rate - high
Albuterol MDPI011
Placebo MDPI330

[back to top]

Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6) on Day 1

"FEV1 AUC 0-6 is the area under the effect-time curve from time 0 (pre-dose) up to 6 hours post-dose. The baseline was the average of the 2 pre-dose FEV1 measurements on that study day. The baseline-adjustment refers to change from baseline at each post dose timepoint recorded on Day 1.~FEV1 was measured using spirometry. Spirometry assessments were obtained predose at -30 ± 5, and - 5 minutes, then post dose at 5 ± 2, 15 ± 5, 30 ± 5, 45 ± 5 minutes, and at 1hr ± 5 min, 2hr ± 5 min, 3hr ± 5 min, 4hr ± 5 min, 5hr ± 5 min, and 6hr ± 5 min." (NCT01424813)
Timeframe: Day 1

InterventionL*hr (Mean)
Placebo MDPI0.52
Albuterol MDPI1.58

[back to top]

Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6) on Day 8

"FEV1 AUC 0-6 is the area under the effect-time curve from time 0 (pre-dose) up to 6 hours post-dose. The baseline was the average of the 2 pre-dose FEV1 measurements on that study day. The baseline-adjustment refers to change from baseline at each post dose timepoint recorded on Day 8.~FEV1 was measured using spirometry. Spirometry assessments were obtained predose at -30 ± 5, and - 5 minutes, then post dose at 5 ± 2, 15 ± 5, 30 ± 5, 45 ± 5 minutes, and at 1hr ± 5 min, 2hr ± 5 min, 3hr ± 5 min, 4hr ± 5 min, 5hr ± 5 min, and 6hr ± 5 min." (NCT01424813)
Timeframe: Day 8

InterventionL*hr (Mean)
Placebo MDPI0.26
Albuterol MDPI0.99

[back to top]

Physical Examination Findings Shifts From Baseline to Endpoint by Treatment Group

Physical exam was recorded as normal or abnormal based on physician assessment. Format for results is: Test Baseline/Endpoint HEENT = head, eyes, ears, nose, throat (NCT01424813)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 85

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
General appearance Normal/NormalGeneral appearance Normal/AbnormalGeneral appearance Abnormal/NormalGeneral appearance Abnormal/AbnormalHEENT Normal/NormalHEENT Normal/AbnormalHEENT Abnormal/NormalHEENT Abnormal/AbnormalChest and Lungs Normal/NormalChest and Lungs Normal/AbnormalChest and Lungs Abnormal/NormalChest and Lungs Abnormal/abnormalHeart Normal/NormalHeart Normal/AbnormalHeart Abnormal/NormalHeart Abnormal/AbnormalAbdomen Normal/NormalAbdomen Normal/AbnormalAbdomen Abnormal/NormalAbdomen Abnormal/AbnormalMusculoskeletal Normal/NormalMusculoskeletal Normal/AbnormalMusculoskeletal Abnormal/NormalMusculoskeletal Abnormal/AbnormalSkin Normal/NormalSkin Normal/AbnormalSkin Abnormal/NormalSkin Abnormal/AbnormalLymph nodes Normal/NormalLymph nodes Normal/AbnormalLymph nodes Abnormal/NormalLymph nodes Abnormal/AbnormalNeurological Normal/NormalNeurological Normal/AbnormalNeurological Abnormal/NormalNeurological Abnormal/Abnormal
Albuterol MDPI76011505121167470770107701076110731407800078000
Placebo MDPI76010461211866821760107510174030750207700076100

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min). Trough at Day 2 was computed as the average of the two values measured at 23 and 24 hours after administration of the morning dose of investigational medicinal product on Day 1. At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected. (NCT01425801)
Timeframe: Baseline and +23 h and +24 h post-dose

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.054
LAS100977 0.313 μg0.166
LAS100977 0.625 μg0.205
LAS100977 1.25 μg0.278
LAS100977 2.5 μg0.346
Salbutamol 400 μg-0.076

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Normalized Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0-24h at Day 1

FEV1 was normalized to baseline. Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min). At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected. (NCT01425801)
Timeframe: Baseline and +15 min, +30 min, +1 h, +2 h, +3 h, +4 h, +6 h, +8 h, +12 h, +14 h, +23 h and +24 h

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.007
LAS100977 0.313 μg0.282
LAS100977 0.625 μg0.321
LAS100977 1.25 μg0.390
LAS100977 2.5 μg0.446
Salbutamol 400 μg0.100

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Normalized Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under the Curve (AUC)

FVC was normalized to baseline. Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min). At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected. (NCT01425801)
Timeframe: Baseline and +15 min, +30 min, +1 h, +2 h, +3 h, +4 h, +6 h, +8 h, +12 h, +14 h, +23 h and +24 h

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.017
LAS100977 0.313 μg0.135
LAS100977 0.625 μg0.109
LAS100977 1.25 μg0.169
LAS100977 2.5 μg0.192
Salbutamol 400 μg0.054

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min). The peak was computed as the highest value observed for each patient during the 4-hour period immediately after the investigational medicinal product administered in the morning. At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 were selected. (NCT01425801)
Timeframe: Baseline and +15 min, +30 min, +1 h, +2 h, +3 h, +4 h post-dose

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.202
LAS100977 0.313 μg0.477
LAS100977 0.625 μg0.524
LAS100977 1.25 μg0.573
LAS100977 2.5 μg0.608
Salbutamol 400 μg0.555

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min). The peak was computed as the highest value observed for each patient during the 4-hour period immediately after the investigational medicinal product administered in the morning. At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected. (NCT01425801)
Timeframe: Baseline and +15 min, +30 min, +1 h, +2 h, +3 h, +4 h post-dose

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.222
LAS100977 0.313 μg0.317
LAS100977 0.625 μg0.329
LAS100977 1.25 μg0.361
LAS100977 2.5 μg0.380
Salbutamol 400 μg0.361

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) at Each Timepoint

Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min). At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected. The number of participants analyzed differed between timepoints - the number of participants analyzed at 0.25 h is shown. (NCT01425801)
Timeframe: Baseline and +15 min, +30 min, +1 h, +2 h, +3 h, +4 h, +6 h, +8 h, +12 h, +14 h, +23 h, +24 h, and +36 h

,,,,,
InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
0.25 hr0.5 hr1 hr2 hr3 hr4 hr6 hr8 hr12 hr14 hr23 hr24 hr36 hr
LAS100977 0.313 μg8.32511.75713.45214.74115.96515.40013.66114.11810.8479.4275.4517.0846.396
LAS100977 0.625 μg8.84612.00614.30716.37117.19017.96016.49015.12812.38811.0086.9558.9185.589
LAS100977 1.25 μg10.78914.36216.92718.50920.35719.45419.08018.19914.25111.7719.89310.9758.742
LAS100977 2.5 μg13.51116.71518.33620.22620.55021.15520.61219.73317.17016.71612.37513.71610.370
Placebo1.5192.4492.4073.5204.4354.2882.6822.7520.402-1.903-2.117-0.6111.904
Salbutamol 400 μg17.74418.80619.08517.75514.53710.6085.7964.4930.9971.892-3.649-1.7362.098

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Timepoint

Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min). At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected. The number of participants analyzed differed between timepoints - the number of participants analyzed at 0.25 h is shown. (NCT01425801)
Timeframe: Baseline and +15 min, +30 min, +1 h, +2 h, +3 h, +4 h, +6 h, +8 h, +12 h, +14 h, +23 h, +24 h, and +36 h

,,,,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
0.25 hr0.5 hr1 hr2 hr3 hr4 hr6 hr8 hr12 hr14 hr23 hr24 hr36 hr
LAS100977 0.313 μg0.1620.1970.1820.1840.1990.1980.1490.1850.1410.0950.1010.0860.128
LAS100977 0.625 μg0.1110.1440.1690.1830.2090.2010.1470.1410.0810.0970.0380.0630.018
LAS100977 1.25 μg0.1250.1770.2190.2340.2410.2020.2000.2160.1460.1730.1100.1110.089
LAS100977 2.5 μg0.1590.1820.2370.2520.2420.2560.2490.2280.1850.1950.1020.1370.118
Placebo0.0380.0590.0340.0600.0890.0550.0570.0540.042-0.027-0.022-0.034-0.011
Salbutamol 400 μg0.2130.2410.2420.2170.1910.1370.0960.0640.0010.006-0.043-0.0790.022

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) at Each Timepoint

Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min). At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected. The number of participants analyzed differed between timepoints - the number of participants analyzed at 0.25 h is shown. (NCT01425801)
Timeframe: Baseline and +15 min, +30 min, +1 h, +2 h, +3 h, +4 h, +6 h, +8 h, +12 h, +14 h, +23 h, +24 h, and +36 h

,,,,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
0.25 hr0.5 hr1 hr2 hr3 hr4 hr6 hr8 hr12 hr14 hr23 hr24 hr36 hr
LAS100977 0.313 μg0.2140.3040.3480.3820.4160.4060.3530.3740.2880.2530.1480.1830.169
LAS100977 0.625 μg0.2370.3190.3730.4290.4500.4710.4320.4030.3260.2910.1810.2330.144
LAS100977 1.25 μg0.2850.3810.4460.4840.5370.5150.5010.4800.3800.3670.2680.2910.238
LAS100977 2.5 μg0.3580.4370.4810.5360.5430.5580.5390.5210.4560.4430.3300.3620.275
Placebo0.0480.0710.0670.0940.1190.1210.0670.0560.005-0.053-0.067-0.0400.035
Salbutamol 400 μg0.4570.4900.4950.4710.3880.2840.1570.1130.0140.032-0.093-0.0520.036

[back to top]

Absolute Values of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Timepoint

Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min). At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected. The number of participants analyzed differed between timepoints - the number of participants analyzed at 0.25 h is shown. (NCT01425801)
Timeframe: Baseline and +15 min, +30 min, +1 h, +2 h, +3 h, +4 h, +6 h, +8 h, +12 h, +14 h, +23 h, +24 h, and +36 h

,,,,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
0.25h0.5 hr1 hr2 hr3 hr4 hr6 hr8 hr12 hr14 hr23 hr24 hr36 hr
LAS100977 0.313 μg4.4204.4584.4424.4454.4624.4594.4134.4564.4094.3574.3664.3594.390
LAS100977 0.625 μg4.3684.4054.4294.4444.4724.4621.4114.4124.3494.3604.3034.3354.280
LAS100977 1.25 μg4.3834.4384.4804.4954.5054.4634.4644.4874.4144.4364.3754.3844.352
LAS100977 2.5 μg4.4174.4434.4984.5124.5054.5174.5134.4994.4534.4584.3674.4104.381
Placebo4.2954.3204.2954.3214.3524.3164.3224.3254.3104.2354.2444.2384.252
Salbutamol 400 μg4.4714.5024.5024.4774.4544.3984.3604.3354.2774.2694.2234.1934.284

[back to top]

Absolute Values of Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) at Each Timepoint

Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min). At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected. (NCT01425801)
Timeframe: Baseline and +15 min, +30 min, +1 h, +2 h, +3 h, +4 h, +6 h, +8 h, +12 h, +14 h, +23 h, +24 h, and +36 h

,,,,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
0.25 hr1 hr2 hr3 hr4 hr6 hr8 hr12 hr14 hr23 hr24 hr36 hr0.5 hr
LAS100977 0.313 μg2.8633.0003.0343.0693.0583.0083.0332.9432.9032.8042.8402.8232.956
LAS100977 0.625 μg2.8863.0253.0813.1023.1243.0873.0622.9802.9412.8362.8902.7982.972
LAS100977 1.25 μg2.9343.0983.1363.1903.1673.1573.1393.0353.0182.9232.9482.8923.033
LAS100977 2.5 μg3.0073.1333.1883.1963.2113.1943.1803.1113.0942.9853.0192.9293.089
Placebo2.6962.7192.7462.7712.7742.7222.7152.6592.5972.5882.6182.6892.723
Salbutamol 400 μg3.1063.1473.1233.0402.9372.8122.7722.6692.6832.5622.6052.6903.142

[back to top]

Time to Peak Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

The peak was computed as the highest value observed for each patient during the 4-hour period immediately after the investigational medicinal product administered in the morning. At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected. (NCT01425801)
Timeframe: +15 min, +30 min, +1 h, +2 h, +3 h, +4 h

InterventionHours (Mean)
Placebo2.1
LAS100977 0.313 μg1.8
LAS100977 0.625 μg2.3
LAS100977 1.25 μg2.1
LAS100977 2.5 μg2.2
Salbutamol 400 μg1.5

[back to top]

Time to Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

The peak was computed as the highest value observed for each patient during the 4-hour period immediately after the investigational medicinal product administered in the morning. At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 were selected. (NCT01425801)
Timeframe: +15 min, +30 min, +1 h, +2 h, +3 h, +4 h post-dose

InterventionHours (Mean)
Placebo2.3
LAS100977 0.313 μg2.6
LAS100977 0.625 μg3.0
LAS100977 1.25 μg3.1
LAS100977 2.5 μg3.0
Salbutamol 400 μg1.1

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min). The peak was computed as the highest value observed for each patient during the 4-hour period immediately after the investigational medicinal product administered in the morning. At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 were selected. (NCT01425801)
Timeframe: Baseline and +15 min, +30 min, +1 h, +2 h, +3 h, +4 h post-dose

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo7.555
LAS100977 0.313 μg18.282
LAS100977 0.625 μg20.212
LAS100977 1.25 μg21.809
LAS100977 2.5 μg23.077
Salbutamol 400 μg21.374

[back to top]

Peak Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

The peak was computed as the highest value observed for each patient during the 4-hour period immediately after the investigational medicinal product administered in the morning. At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected. (NCT01425801)
Timeframe: +15 min, +30 min, +1 h, +2 h, +3 h, +4 h

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo4.483
LAS100977 0.313 μg4.578
LAS100977 0.625 μg4.590
LAS100977 1.25 μg4.622
LAS100977 2.5 μg4.641
Salbutamol 400 μg4.622

[back to top]

Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

The peak was computed as the highest value observed for each patient during the 4-hour period immediately after the investigational medicinal product administered in the morning on Day 1. At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 were selected. (NCT01425801)
Timeframe: +15 min, +30 min, +1 h, +2 h, +3 h, +4 h post-dose

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.855
LAS100977 0.313 μg3.129
LAS100977 0.625 μg3.177
LAS100977 1.25 μg3.225
LAS100977 2.5 μg3.260
Salbutamol 400 μg3.207

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

Baseline was the average of the two values measured just prior to the administration of the dose of investigational medicinal product at Day 1 of each visit (time points -45 min and -15 min). Trough at Day 2 was computed as the average of the two values measured at 23 and 24 hours after administration of the morning dose of investigational medicinal product on Day 1. At each time point, three technically adequate lung function measurements were performed by spirometry according to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of the ATS/ERS; the highest values for the FEV1 and FVC were selected. (NCT01425801)
Timeframe: Baseline and +23 h +24 h post-dose

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.028
LAS100977 0.313 μg0.094
LAS100977 0.625 μg0.050
LAS100977 1.25 μg0.111
LAS100977 2.5 μg0.120
Salbutamol 400 μg-0.065

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Evening (Pre-bronchodilator and Pre-dose) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at the End of the 24-week Treatment Period

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Evening clinic visit FEV1 is defined as the clinic visit (pre-bronchodilator and pre-dose) FEV1 measurement taken at the Week 24 clinic visit. Pre-dose and pre-rescue albuterol/salbutamol trough FEV1 were measured electronically by spirometry in the evening at the Baseline through Week 24 clinic visits. The highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. Baseline was the pre-dose value obtained at Visit 2. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing, pre-dose, post-Baseline on-treatment measurement at scheduled clinic visits was used to impute the missing value. (NCT01431950)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
FF 100 µg OD0.208
FF 200 µg OD0.284

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Symptom-free 24-hour (hr) Periods Over the 24-week Treatment Period

Asthma symptoms were recorded in a daily eDairy by the participants every day in the morning and evening before taking any rescue or study medication and before the peak expiratory flow measurement. A 24-hour period in which a participant's responses to both the morning and evening assessments indicated no symptoms was considered to be symptom free. A 24-hour period was considered as missing if both the day time and night time data were missing or if one was symptom-free but the other was missing. The Baseline value was the average of the values of the last 7 days of the daily eDiary prior to the randomization of the participant. Change from Baseline was calculated as the averaged value during the 24-week Treatment Period minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment. (NCT01431950)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of symptom-free 24-hr periods (Least Squares Mean)
FF 100 µg OD17.5
FF 200 µg OD19.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free 24-hour (hr) Periods Over the 24-week Treatment Period

The number of inhalations of rescue bronchodilator, albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol, used during the day and night was recorded by the participants in a daily electronic diary (eDiary). A 24-hour period in which a participant's responses to both the morning and evening assessments indicated no use of rescue medication was considered to be rescue free. A 24-hour period was considered as missing if both day time and night time values were missing or if one of the day time or night time values were missing and the other value indicated no use of rescue medication. The Baseline value is the average of the values over the last 7 days of the daily eDiary prior to the randomization of the participant. Change from Baseline was calculated as the averaged value during the 24-week Treatment Period minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment. (NCT01431950)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of rescue-free 24-hr periods (Least Squares Mean)
FF 100 µg OD21.3
FF 200 µg OD23.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) PEF Averaged Over the 24-week Treatment Period

PEF is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF was measured by the participants using a hand-held electronic peak flow meter each morning and evening prior to the dose of study medication and any rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol use. Change from Baseline (defined as the average of the values of the last 7 days prior to randomization of the participants) was calculated as the value of the averaged daily AM PEF over the 24-week Treatment Period minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment. (NCT01431950)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24

InterventionL/min (Least Squares Mean)
FF 100 µg OD13.4
FF 200 µg OD13.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Daily Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the 24-week Treatment Period

PEF is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF was measured by the participants using a hand-held electronic peak flow meter each morning and evening prior to the dose of study medication and any rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol use. Change from Baseline (defined as the average of the values of the last 7 days prior to randomization of the participants) was calculated as the value of the averaged daily trough PM PEF over the 24-week Treatment Period minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment. (NCT01431950)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 24

InterventionLiters/minute (L/min) (Least Squares Mean)
FF 100 µg OD5.9
FF 200 µg OD7.2

[back to top]

Time-to-First Severe Asthma Exacerbation (SAEX): Number of First SAEX in the MF/F vs MF Arms

The key secondary efficacy outcome was time-to-first protocol-defined asthma exacerbation (SAEX). The SAEX were deteriorations of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids (tablets, suspension, or injection) for >= 3 consecutive days, in-patient hospitalization >= 24 hours, or an emergency department (ED) visit < 24 hours that required systemic corticosteroids in the MF/F MDI BID arm versus the MF MDI BID arm. The number of first SAEX occurred from initiation of study treatment to 7 days after the last treatment (modified intention-to-treat). This outcome was measured as the HR and 95% CI for the number of first SAEX in the MF/F MDI BID arm versus the number of first SAEX in the MF MDI BID arm. Given insufficient data for SAEX events, it was not informative to report the time-to-first SAEX in the overall population. Therefore, the number of first SAEXs in either arm is reported as a descriptive measure. For each participant, first SAEX denotes first event per participant. (NCT01471340)
Timeframe: 26 weeks, plus 7 days after the last treatment

InterventionAsthma exacerbations (Number)
MF/F MDI BID708
MF MDI BID779

[back to top]

Number of SAO Components in MF/F Participants vs MF Participants

To further examine the primary safety outcome, each adjudicated component of the SAO composite endpoint (asthma-related hospitalization, asthma-related intubation and asthma-related death), was tabulated for descriptive purposes only to show the relative contribution of each component to the SAO composite. Hospitalizations were defined as an in-patient stay of >= 24 hour in a hospital, emergency department or equivalent healthcare facility. Intubation was defined as endotracheal intubation only. (NCT01471340)
Timeframe: 26 weeks, or 7 days after the last treatment dose, whichever occurred later

,
InterventionSAO components (Number)
First SAOAsthma-related hospitalizationsAsthma-related intubationsAsthma-related deaths
MF MDI BID323200
MF/F MDI BID393900

[back to top]

Time-to-First Serious Asthma Outcomes (SAO): Number of First SAO in the MF/F vs MF Arms

The primary safety outcome was the time-to-first SAO (a composite endpoint of adjudicated asthma-related hospitalizations, adjudicated asthma-related intubations, and adjudicated asthma-related deaths). To accomplish this, the number of participants experiencing a first SAO was collected for 26 weeks following initiation of study treatment (or 7 days after the last treatment dose, whichever occurred later). Data generated by this methodology were used to compute a hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), modeling the likelihood of a first SAO occurring at any given time in the MF/F arm relative to the MF arm. Although data were sufficient to generate a HR and 95% CI, time-to-first SAO in the overall population could not be accurately reported due to insufficient SAO occurrence. Therefore, the number of first SAO in either arm is reported as a descriptive measure. For each participant, first SAO denotes first event per participant. (NCT01471340)
Timeframe: 26 weeks, or 7 days after the last treatment dose, whichever occurred later

InterventionSerious asthma outcomes (Number)
MF/F MDI BID39
MF MDI BID32

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Fp

Approximately 20% of subjects randomized to the study and distributed across preselected study sites were to participate in fluticasone propionate pharmacokinetic assessments (the pharmacokinetic cohort). Subjects who had received fluticasone propionate in any form (orally, inhaled, or nasal) within 14 days of Day 1 were not permitted to participate in pharmacokinetic assessments. (NCT01479621)
Timeframe: Day 1: predose (within 10 minutes of treatment administration), and 5, 10, 15, 30, and 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1 hour 15 minutes, 1 hour 30 minutes, and 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Fp MDPI 12.5 mcg5.4
Fp MDPI 25 mcg10.0
Fp MDPI 50 mcg12.9
Fp MDPI 100 mcg33.6
Flovent Diskus 100mcg23.4

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Remaining in the Study at Week 12

The time to withdrawal due to stopping criteria was compared between the treatment groups with the log rank test. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the probability of remaining in the study at week 12 with 95% CI was presented by treatment group. Subjects who completed the study were censored at the date of completion, subjects who withdrew for reasons other than stopping criteria were censored at the time of withdrawal. Stopping criteria were based on day subject first met stopping criteria, using subject's diary data and asthma exacerbations recorded in CRF. (NCT01479621)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 84

Interventionprobability (Number)
Fp MDPI 12.5 mcg0.8041
Fp MDPI 25 mcg0.7895
Fp MDPI 50 mcg0.9077
Fp MDPI 100 mcg0.7657
Placebo MDPI0.5655
Flovent Diskus 100mcg0.8272

[back to top]

Area Under The Curve From Time 0 Until The Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) of Fp

Approximately 20% of subjects randomized to the study and distributed across preselected study sites were to participate in fluticasone propionate pharmacokinetic assessments (the pharmacokinetic cohort). Subjects who had received fluticasone propionate in any form (orally, inhaled, or nasal) within 14 days of Day 1 were not permitted to participate in pharmacokinetic assessments. (NCT01479621)
Timeframe: Day 1: predose (within 10 minutes of treatment administration), and 5, 10, 15, 30, and 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1 hour 15 minutes, 1 hour 30 minutes, and 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Interventionpg*hr/mL (Mean)
Fp MDPI 12.5 mcg21.6
Fp MDPI 25 mcg42.0
Fp MDPI 50 mcg63.2
Fp MDPI 100 mcg153.8
Flovent Diskus 100mcg10.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Weekly Average Of Daily Trough (Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period Inclusive of Flovent Diskus Data

"Peak expiratory flow was determined in the AM and in the PM, before administration of study or rescue medications using a handheld electronic peak flow meter. The highest value of triplicate measurements obtained was recorded by the subject's diary device.~On mornings for which a treatment visit was scheduled (TV1 through TV9), the PEF was measured and recorded at the investigational site visit.~Baseline trough AM PEF was defined as the average of recorded (non-missing) trough AM PEF assessments over the 7 days directly preceding first study drug intake.~The p-values for the treatment comparisons to placebo are from an MMRM model including all treatments: change from baseline = baseline PEF + sex + age + treatment + visit + treatment*visit with an unstructured covariance matrix assumed." (NCT01479621)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -7 to 1, am pre-dose), During Study (Days 2-84 am pre-dose)

Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Fp MDPI 12.5 mcg31.20
Fp MDPI 25 mcg21.27
Fp MDPI 50 mcg29.63
Fp MDPI 100 mcg27.66
Placebo MDPI9.30
Flovent Diskus 100mcg26.96

[back to top]

Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period

An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relationship of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. (NCT01479621)
Timeframe: Day 1 -84

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any adverse event (AE)Severe AETreatment-related AEDeathsOther serious AEWithdrawn from treatment due to AE
Flovent Diskus 100mcg3231022
Fp MDPI 100 mcg3722021
Fp MDPI 12.5 mcg3106000
Fp MDPI 25 mcg3203000
Fp MDPI 50 mcg3633010
Placebo MDPI3131022

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Weekly Average Of Daily Trough (Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period

"Peak expiratory flow was determined in the AM and in the PM, before administration of study or rescue medications using a handheld electronic peak flow meter. The highest value of triplicate measurements obtained was recorded by the subject's diary device.~On mornings for which a treatment visit was scheduled (TV1 through TV9), the PEF was measured and recorded at the investigational site visit.~Baseline trough AM PEF was defined as the average of recorded (non-missing) trough AM PEF assessments over the 7 days directly preceding first study drug intake.~The p-values for the treatment comparisons to placebo are from an MMRM model excluding FLOVENT DISKUS data: change from baseline = baseline PEF + sex + age + treatment + visit + treatment*visit with an unstructured covariance matrix assumed." (NCT01479621)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -7 to 1, am pre-dose), During Study (Days 2-84 am pre-dose)

Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Fp MDPI 12.5 mcg30.99
Fp MDPI 25 mcg21.01
Fp MDPI 50 mcg29.58
Fp MDPI 100 mcg27.55
Placebo MDPI9.26

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Weekly Average Of Daily Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period Inclusive of Flovent Diskus Data

"Peak expiratory flow was determined in the AM and in the PM, before administration of study or rescue medications using a handheld electronic peak flow meter. The highest value of triplicate measurements obtained was recorded by the subject's diary device.~PM PEF baseline was defined as the average of recorded (nonmissing) PM PEF assessments over the 7 days directly preceding first study drug intake.~The p-values for the treatment comparisons to placebo are from an MMRM model including all treatment groups: change from baseline = baseline PEF + sex + age + treatment + visit + treatment*visit with an unstructured covariance matrix assumed." (NCT01479621)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -7 to 1, am pre-dose), During Study (Days 2-84 am pre-dose)

Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Fp MDPI 12.5 mcg28.00
Fp MDPI 25 mcg18.97
Fp MDPI 50 mcg22.27
Fp MDPI 100 mcg20.47
Placebo MDPI9.70
Flovent Diskus 100mcg24.95

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Weekly Average Of Daily Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period

"Peak expiratory flow was determined in the AM and in the PM, before administration of study or rescue medications using a handheld electronic peak flow meter. The highest value of triplicate measurements obtained was recorded by the subject's diary device.~PM PEF baseline was defined as the average of recorded (nonmissing) PM PEF assessments over the 7 days directly preceding first study drug intake.~The p-values for the treatment comparisons to placebo are from an MMRM model excluding FLOVENT DISKUS data: change from baseline = baseline PEF + sex + age + treatment + visit + treatment*visit with an unstructured covariance matrix assumed." (NCT01479621)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -7 to 1, am pre-dose), During Study (Days 2-84 am pre-dose)

Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Fp MDPI 12.5 mcg27.65
Fp MDPI 25 mcg18.69
Fp MDPI 50 mcg22.20
Fp MDPI 100 mcg20.48
Placebo MDPI9.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Trough (Morning Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period Inclusive of Flovent Diskus Data

"Trough FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry at morning (AM) investigational site visits, before administration of the AM dose of study drug and before albuterol/salbutamol administration. The highest FEV1 value from 3 acceptable and 2 reproducible maneuvers was used. All FEV1 data were submitted to a central reading center for evaluation.~The p-values for the treatment comparisons to placebo are from an MMRM model including data from all treatments: change from baseline = baseline FEV1 + sex + age + treatment + visit + treatment*visit with an unstructured covariance matrix assumed." (NCT01479621)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose), During Study (Days 7, 14, 28, 56 and 84 pre-dose)

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Fp MDPI 12.5 mcg0.172
Fp MDPI 25 mcg0.232
Fp MDPI 50 mcg0.245
Fp MDPI 100 mcg0.268
Placebo MDPI0.120
Flovent Diskus 100mcg0.234

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Trough (Morning Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period

"Trough FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry at morning (AM) investigational site visits, before administration of the AM dose of study drug and before albuterol/salbutamol administration. The highest FEV1 value from 3 acceptable and 2 reproducible maneuvers was used. All FEV1 data were submitted to a central reading center for evaluation.~The p-values for the treatment comparisons to placebo are from an MMRM model excluding FLOVENT DISKUS data: change from baseline = baseline FEV1 + sex + age + treatment + visit + treatment*visit with an unstructured covariance matrix assumed." (NCT01479621)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose), During Study (Days 7, 14, 28, 56 and 84 pre-dose)

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Fp MDPI 12.5 mcg0.170
Fp MDPI 25 mcg0.229
Fp MDPI 50 mcg0.243
Fp MDPI 100 mcg0.267
Placebo MDPI0.118

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-Free 24-hour Periods During the 12-Week Treatment Period

"The number of inhalations of rescue medication used each day and each night was recorded in the subject's diary device.~Change from baseline in the percentage of rescue-free 24-hour periods was analyzed with a marginal (also called population averaged) logistic model. The model included 2 time points of measurement for each subject: the baseline and the treatment period. The model contained covariates for sex, age, and treatment. The model for the 2 time points was considered as an incomplete randomized block model, with each subject as a block, receiving the baseline level in 1 sub-block and either active treatment or placebo in the other sub-block. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) algorithm was used to fit the model, using a robust estimator for the variance which provided a proper adjustment for possible correlation between the 2 measurements on each subject.~Measure type are estimated mean and measure of dispersion is the standard error of the estimated mean." (NCT01479621)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -7 to -1), During Study (Days 1-84)

Interventionpercentage of total 24 hour periods (Mean)
Fp MDPI 12.5 mcg34.08
Fp MDPI 25 mcg31.76
Fp MDPI 50 mcg28.06
Fp MDPI 100 mcg24.07
Placebo MDPI21.30
Flovent Diskus 100mcg29.82

[back to top]

Oropharyngeal Exam Findings at Each Study Visit

"Oropharyngeal examinations for visual evidence of oral candidiasis were conducted at all study visits. If the visual oropharyngeal examination was abnormal at the screening visit, the subject was excluded from entering the study and subjects with an abnormal oropharyngeal exam on Day 1 were not eligible for randomization. Any visual evidence of oral candidiasis during the treatment period of the study was evaluated by obtaining and analyzing a swab of the suspect area. Appropriate therapy was to be initiated immediately at the discretion of the investigator and was not to be delayed for culture confirmation. Subjects with a culture-positive infection could continue participation in the study on appropriate anti-infective therapy, provided this therapy was not prohibited by the protocol. If a subject required a protocol-prohibited medication for therapy, the subject was to be discontinued from the study.~Data format: Time frame, yes or no" (NCT01479621)
Timeframe: Screening (week -3 to -2), Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Screening - YesScreening - NoWeek 0 - YesWeek 0 - NoWeek 1 - YesWeek 1 - NoWeek 2 - YesWeek 2 - NoWeek 4 - Yes (positive culture)Week 4 - NoWeek 8 - YesWeek 8 - NoWeek 12 - YesWeek 12 - No
Flovent Diskus 100mcg010401040980930900830101
Fp MDPI 100 mcg0103010301000950910840100
Fp MDPI 12.5 mcg010301030930900880840102
Fp MDPI 25 mcg010401040980931890850102
Fp MDPI 50 mcg0104010401000990970920103
Placebo MDPI01040104094083075066097

[back to top]

Time of Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Fp

Approximately 20% of subjects randomized to the study and distributed across preselected study sites were to participate in fluticasone propionate pharmacokinetic assessments (the pharmacokinetic cohort). Subjects who had received fluticasone propionate in any form (orally, inhaled, or nasal) within 14 days of Day 1 were not permitted to participate in pharmacokinetic assessments. (NCT01479621)
Timeframe: Day 1: predose (within 10 minutes of treatment administration), and 5, 10, 15, 30, and 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1 hour 15 minutes, 1 hour 30 minutes, and 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Interventionhours (Mean)
Fp MDPI 12.5 mcg1.2
Fp MDPI 25 mcg1.4
Fp MDPI 50 mcg1.7
Fp MDPI 100 mcg1.1
Flovent Diskus 100mcg1.7

[back to top]

Total Total Transient Dyspnea Index (TDI) Score After 6 Weeks of Treatment QVA149 Compared to Tiotropium

Total Transient Dyspnea Index (TDI) is part of the BDI/TDI questionnaire where participants indicated whether they improved or deteriorated since their Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI). The BDI and TDI each had 3 domains: activities, tasks, and effort. BDI domains were rated from 0 (very severe) to 4 (none) and the rates summed for the total BDI score ranging from 0 to 12; the lower the score the worse the severity of dyspnea. TDI domains were rated from -6 (major deterioration) to 6 (major improvement) and the rates summed for the total TDI score ranging from -18 to 18. However, to ensure comparability with the TDI paper version, all TDI values were divided by 2 before the analysis. If data was missing or insufficient for any one of the domains a BDI/TDI was calculated. BDI = Baseline Dyspnea Index taken 75 min prior to the first dose in each treatment period. TDI = Transition Dyspnea Index taken after 6 weeks of treatment 75 min prior to the last dose in each treatment period. (NCT01490125)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BDITDI
QVA149 + Placebo to Tiotropium7.340.98
Tiotropium + Placebo to QVA1497.310.47

[back to top]

Total Total Transient Dyspnea Index (TDI) Score After 6 Weeks of Treatment QVA149 Compared to Placebo

Total Transient Dyspnea Index (TDI) is part of the BDI/TDI questionnaire where participants indicated whether they improved or deteriorated since their Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI). The BDI and TDI each had 3 domains: activities, tasks, and effort. BDI domains were rated from 0 (very severe) to 4 (none) and the rates summed for the total BDI score ranging from 0 to 12; the lower the score the worse the severity of dyspnea. TDI domains were rated from -6 (major deterioration) to 6 (major improvement) and the rates summed for the total TDI score ranging from -18 to 18. However, to ensure comparability with the TDI paper version, all TDI values were divided by 2 before the analysis. If data was missing or insufficient for any one of the domains a BDI/TDI was calculated. BDI = Baseline Dyspnea Index taken 75 min prior to the first dose in each treatment period. TDI = Transition Dyspnea Index taken after 6 weeks of treatment 75 min prior to the last dose in each treatment period. (NCT01490125)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BDITDI
Placebo7.33-0.38
QVA149 + Placebo to Tiotropium7.340.98

[back to top]

Standardized Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under the Curve (AUC) 5min-4 Hrs After First Dose and 6 Weeks of Treatment With QVA149 Compared to Placebo and Tiotropium

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is the total amount of air that can be exhaled by the patient after a full inhalation. The FVC was measured via spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards at 5 min-4 hr post dose of day 1 and week 6. (NCT01490125)
Timeframe: 5min-4hr at day 1 and week 6 post-dose

,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1 (n=210,219,217)Week 6 (n= 205,209,206)
Placebo3.0202.957
QVA149 + Placebo to Tiotropium3.3403.393
Tiotropium + Placebo to QVA1493.2493.269

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in The Capacity of Daily Living During the Morning (CDLM) Score Averaged Over 6 Weeks of Treatment

"The Capacity of Daily Living during the Morning (CDLM) is a self-administered daily assessment. The CDLM asks COPD patients to (i) report their ability to carry out 6 morning activities and (ii) rate the difficulty in performing those activities on a five point Likert-type scale ranging from not at all difficult to extremely difficult. For each of the six morning activities a score ranging from 0 (=so difficult that they could not carry out the activity by themselves) to 5 (not at all difficult to carry out the activity by themselves) is calculated by using the responses from the two questions for each activity. Daily CDLM is calculated using the scores average from the 6 morning activities. CDLM is calculated as the average daily CDLM score over 6 weeks of treatment. The change from baseline in CDLM score over 6 weeks is analyzed using a MIXED model with baseline CDLM score as a covariate. A CDLM score of 0.20 is considered to be a minimal clinically important difference." (NCT01490125)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
QVA149 + Placebo to Tiotropium0.09
Tiotropium + Placebo to QVA1490.08
Placebo-0.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Used Over the 6 Weeks of Treatment

The number of puffs of rescue medication taken by participants, were collected each day during the study via entries in e-diaries (NCT01490125)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionpuffs (Least Squares Mean)
QVA149 + Placebo to Tiotropium-1.02
Tiotropium + Placebo to QVA149-0.57
Placebo0.41

[back to top]

Standardized Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) 5min-4h After First Dose and 6 Weeks of Treatment With QVA149 Compared to Placebo and Tiotropium

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured with spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Measurements were taken at 5 min- 4hr post-dose of day 1 and week 6. The standardized FEV1 Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated as the sum of trapezoids divided by the length of time. (NCT01490125)
Timeframe: 5min-4hr at day 1 and week 6 post-dose

,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1 (n=220,219,2117)Week 6 (n=205,209,206)
Placebo1.3521.302
QVA149 + Placebo to Tiotropium1.5641.636
Tiotropium + Placebo to QVA1491.4961.529

[back to top]

Time Of Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax)

(NCT01576718)
Timeframe: Day 1 predose (within 10 minutes of treatment administration), and 5, 10, 15, 30, and 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1 hour 15 minutes, 1 hour 30 minutes, and 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Interventionhours (Mean)
Fp MDPI 50 mcg1.0
Fp MDPI 100 mcg1.2
Fp MDPI 200 mcg2.2
Fp MDPI 400 mcg1.4
Flovent Diskus 250mcg1.8

[back to top]

24-Hour Urinary Cortisol Excretion at Baseline, Week 12 and Endpoint

24-hour urinary cortisol excretion was determined from 24-hour pooled-urine samples; urine was refrigerated until return to the investigational site after each 24-hour collection period. Urine was collected within 7 days of Day 1 and within 7 days of Week 12. Urine cortisol sample collection was not required at endpoint visit for subjects who terminated early from the study. (NCT01576718)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12, Endpoint

,,,,,
Interventionnmol/day (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Endpoint
Flovent Diskus 250mcg66.258.558.4
Fp MDPI 100 mcg63.861.561.5
Fp MDPI 200 mcg66.666.865.8
Fp MDPI 400 mcg57.446.245.0
Fp MDPI 50 mcg65.371.871.0
Placebo MDPI74.369.274.4

[back to top]

Patients With Positive Swab Test Results for Oral Candidiasis

"Oropharyngeal examinations for visual evidence of oral candidiasis were conducted at each visit. Any visual evidence of oral candidiasis during the oropharyngeal exam was evaluated by obtaining and analyzing a swab of the suspect area.~This outcomes indicates how many patients had positive swab test results. The total number of patients who had oropharyngeal exams at each timepoint are specified in the timepoint field. Appropriate therapy was to be initiated immediately at the discretion of the investigator and was not to be delayed for culture confirmation. Subjects with a culture-positive infection could continue participation in the study on appropriate anti-infective therapy, provided this therapy was not prohibited by the protocol." (NCT01576718)
Timeframe: Screening (Days -21 to -14), Randomization (Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12

,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ScreeningDay 1Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 10Week 12
Flovent Diskus 250mcg0110000101
Fp MDPI 100 mcg0000000000
Fp MDPI 200 mcg0101010100
Fp MDPI 400 mcg0002411011
Fp MDPI 50 mcg0000010000
Placebo MDPI0110000000

[back to top]

Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period

An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relationship of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. (NCT01576718)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 12

,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse event (AE)Severe AETreatment-related AEDeathsOther serious AEsWithdrawn from treatment due to AEs
Flovent Diskus 250mcg2702000
Fp MDPI 100 mcg2711011
Fp MDPI 200 mcg3416011
Fp MDPI 400 mcg4119001
Fp MDPI 50 mcg3134011
Placebo MDPI3315011

[back to top]

The Kaplan-Meier Estimate Of The Probability Of Remaining In The Study At Week 12

"The analysis of probability of remaining in the study at Week 12 used the time to patient withdrawal for worsening asthma. Worsening asthma was defined as:~clinic visit FEV1 below the FEV1 stability limit value calculated on Day 1.~any 7-day run-in or treatment window (using information from the patient diary) during which the subject experienced:~3 or more days in which the highest PEF has fallen below the PEF stability limit calculated on Day 1~3 or more days in which ≥12 inhalations/day of albuterol/salbutamol was used~2 or more days in which the subject experienced a nighttime asthma symptom score of >2~clinical asthma exacerbation, defined as worsening asthma requiring any treatment other than study drug or rescue albuterol/salbutamol including the use of systemic corticosteroids and/or ER visit or hospitalization.~Patients who had withdrawn due to reasons other than worsening asthma were right-censored at the date of last assessment." (NCT01576718)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 12

Interventionprobability (Number)
Fp MDPI 50 mcg0.6872
Fp MDPI 100 mcg0.6330
Fp MDPI 200 mcg0.5852
Fp MDPI 400 mcg0.6109
Placebo MDPI0.4722
Flovent Diskus 250mcg0.5657

[back to top]

Area Under The Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero To The Time Of The Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t)

(NCT01576718)
Timeframe: Day 1 predose (within 10 minutes of treatment administration), and 5, 10, 15, 30, and 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1 hour 15 minutes, 1 hour 30 minutes, and 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Interventionpg*hr/mL (Mean)
Fp MDPI 50 mcg117.6
Fp MDPI 100 mcg126.8
Fp MDPI 200 mcg292.0
Fp MDPI 400 mcg462.8
Flovent Diskus 250mcg162.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In The Percentage Of Rescue-Free 24-Hour Periods

"The change from baseline in the percentage of rescue-free 24-hour periods was analyzed with a marginal (also called population averaged) logistic model, with the response being the proportion of rescue-free 24-hour periods. The model included 2 time points of measurement for each subject: the baseline (the last 7 days before the treatment period) and the treatment period. The model contained covariates for sex, age, and treatment. Rescue-free days were as indicated in patient diaries.~Data values are estimated means." (NCT01576718)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -6 to Day 1 predose), Treatment (Day 1 to Week 12)

Interventionpercentage of total 24 hour periods (Mean)
Fp MDPI 50 mcg22.78
Fp MDPI 100 mcg26.41
Fp MDPI 200 mcg16.18
Fp MDPI 400 mcg28.05
Placebo MDPI27.15
Flovent Diskus 250mcg15.87

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Trough (Morning Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period

"Trough FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry at morning (AM) investigational site visits, before administration of the AM dose of study drug, and before albuterol/salbutamol administration. The highest FEV1 value from 3 acceptable and 2 reproducible maneuvers was used. All FEV1 data were submitted to a central reading center for evaluation.~The p-values for the treatment comparisons to placebo are from an MMRM model excluding FLOVENT DISKUS data: change from baseline = baseline FEV1 + sex + age + treatment + visit + treatment*visit with an unstructured covariance matrix assumed." (NCT01576718)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Fp MDPI 50 mcg0.059
Fp MDPI 100 mcg0.101
Fp MDPI 200 mcg0.109
Fp MDPI 400 mcg0.125
Placebo MDPI0.053

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Trough (Morning Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period (Including the Flovent Diskus Treatment Arm)

"Peak expiratory flow was determined in the AM and in the PM, before administration of study or rescue medications using a handheld electronic peak flow meter. The highest value of triplicate measurements obtained was recorded by the subject's diary device.~On mornings for which a treatment visit was scheduled (TV1 through TV9), the PEF was measured and recorded at the investigational site visit.~Baseline trough AM PEF was defined as the average of recorded (nonmissing) trough AM PEF assessments over the 7 days directly preceding first study drug intake.~The p-values for the treatment comparisons to Flovent Diskus are from an MMRM model which includes data from all treatments: change from baseline = baseline PEF + sex + age + treatment + visit + treatment*visit with an unstructured covariance matrix assumed." (NCT01576718)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Fp MDPI 50 mcg0.063
Fp MDPI 100 mcg0.102
Fp MDPI 200 mcg0.113
Fp MDPI 400 mcg0.129
Placebo MDPI0.057
Flovent Diskus 250mcg0.110

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Weekly Average Of Daily Trough (Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period

"Peak expiratory flow was determined in the AM and in the PM, before administration of study or rescue medications using a handheld electronic peak flow meter. The highest value of triplicate measurements obtained was recorded by the subject's diary device.~PM PEF baseline was defined as the average of recorded (nonmissing) PM PEF assessments over the 7 days directly preceding first study drug intake.~The p-values for the treatment comparisons to placebo are from an MMRM model excluding FLOVENT DISKUS data: change from baseline = baseline PEF + sex + age + treatment + visit + treatment*visit with an unstructured covariance matrix assumed." (NCT01576718)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -6 to Day 1 pre-dose), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12

Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Fp MDPI 50 mcg3.81
Fp MDPI 100 mcg6.41
Fp MDPI 200 mcg7.45
Fp MDPI 400 mcg10.97
Placebo MDPI3.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Weekly Average Of Daily Trough (Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period (Including the Flovent Diskus Treatment Arm)

"Peak expiratory flow was determined in the AM and in the PM, before administration of study or rescue medications using a handheld electronic peak flow meter. The highest value of triplicate measurements obtained was recorded by the subject's diary device.~PM PEF baseline was defined as the average of recorded (nonmissing) PM PEF assessments over the 7 days directly preceding first study drug intake.~The p-values for the treatment comparisons to Flovent Diskus are from an MMRM model that included data for all treatments: change from baseline = baseline PEF + sex + age + treatment + visit + treatment*visit with an unstructured covariance matrix assumed." (NCT01576718)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -6 to Day 1 pre-dose), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12

Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Fp MDPI 50 mcg4.22
Fp MDPI 100 mcg6.52
Fp MDPI 200 mcg7.89
Fp MDPI 400 mcg11.72
Placebo MDPI3.35
Flovent Diskus 250mcg12.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Weekly Average Of Daily Trough (Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period

"Peak expiratory flow was determined in the AM and in the PM, before administration of study or rescue medications using a handheld electronic peak flow meter. The highest value of triplicate measurements obtained was recorded by the subject's diary device.~On mornings for which a treatment visit was scheduled (TV1 through TV9), the PEF was measured and recorded at the investigational site visit.~Baseline trough AM PEF was defined as the average of recorded (non-missing) trough AM PEF assessments over the 7 days directly preceding first study drug intake.~The p-values for the treatment comparisons to placebo are from an MMRM model excluding FLOVENT DISKUS data: change from baseline = baseline PEF + sex + age + treatment + visit + treatment*visit with an unstructured covariance matrix assumed." (NCT01576718)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -6 to Day 1 pre-dose), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12

Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Fp MDPI 50 mcg10.48
Fp MDPI 100 mcg9.34
Fp MDPI 200 mcg10.03
Fp MDPI 400 mcg9.61
Placebo MDPI2.24

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Weekly Average Of Daily Trough (Predose And Pre-Rescue Bronchodilator) Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over The 12-Week Treatment Period (Including the Flovent Diskus Treatment Arm)

"Peak expiratory flow was determined in the AM and in the PM, before administration of study or rescue medications using a handheld electronic peak flow meter. The highest value of triplicate measurements obtained was recorded by the subject's diary device.~On mornings for which a treatment visit was scheduled (TV1 through TV9), the PEF was measured and recorded at the investigational site visit.~Baseline trough AM PEF was defined as the average of recorded (nonmissing) trough AM PEF assessments over the 7 days directly preceding first study drug intake.~The p-values for the treatment comparisons to Flovent Diskus are from an MMRM model that included data for all treatments: change from baseline = baseline PEF + sex + age + treatment + visit + treatment*visit with an unstructured covariance matrix assumed." (NCT01576718)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -6 to Day 1 pre-dose), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12

Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Fp MDPI 50 mcg10.85
Fp MDPI 100 mcg9.39
Fp MDPI 200 mcg10.29
Fp MDPI 400 mcg10.40
Placebo MDPI2.52
Flovent Diskus 250mcg15.97

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

(NCT01576718)
Timeframe: Day 1 predose (within 10 minutes of treatment administration), and 5, 10, 15, 30, and 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1 hour 15 minutes, 1 hour 30 minutes, and 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Fp MDPI 50 mcg19.1
Fp MDPI 100 mcg26.5
Fp MDPI 200 mcg55.2
Fp MDPI 400 mcg83.0
Flovent Diskus 250mcg32.5

[back to top]

Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score After 4 Weeks and 12 Weeks of Treatment

"Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) captures changes from baseline. The TDI score is based on three domains with each domain scored from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement), to give an overall score of -9 to +9, a negative score indicating a deterioration from baseline. A TDI focal score of 1 is considered to be a clinically significant improvement from baseline.~ANCOVA model: TDI focal score = treatment + Baseline dyspnea index (BDI) + baseline Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use (Yes/No) + FEV1 reversibility components + baseline smoking status + region + center(region). Center is included as a random effect nested within region." (NCT01613326)
Timeframe: Weeks 4 and 12

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n= 289, 287)Week 12 (n= 290, 285)
NVA2372.2091.990
Tiotropium2.0862.178

[back to top]

Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Day 1 and Week 4

"FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation, measured through spirometry testing.~Trough FEV1 is defined as the average of the post-dose 23 h 15 min and the 23 h 45 min FEV1 values. Trough assessments taken outside 22 h 45 min - 24 h 15 min are excluded from this analysis.~ANCOVA model: Trough FEV1 = treatment + baseline FEV1 + baseline Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use (Yes/No) + FEV1 reversibility components + baseline smoking status + region + center(region). Center is included as a random effect nested within region." (NCT01613326)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Week 4

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1 (n=296, 288)Week 4 (n=284, 280)
NVA2371.3851.416
Tiotropium1.3861.416

[back to top]

Standardized Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) (5 Min-4 h) Post-dose

"Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) was measured with spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards.~Area Under the Curve (AUC) is calculated using the trapezoidal rule using the existing FEV1 measurements (i.e., the missing FEV1 measurements are not interpolated).~ANCOVA model: FEV1 AUC = treatment + baseline FEV1 + baseline Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use (Yes/No) + FEV1 reversibility components + baseline smoking status + region + center(region). Center is included as a random effect nested within region." (NCT01613326)
Timeframe: Day 1 and week 12

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1 (n=298, 292)Week 12 (290, 282)
NVA2371.4961.493
Tiotropium1.4381.470

[back to top]

Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) During 5 Min to 4 Hours Post-dose, at Day 1 and Week 12

Spirometry was conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Peak FEV1 is the maximum FEV1 recorded during first 4 hours post dose. ANCOVA model: Peak FEV1 = treatment + baseline FEV1 + baseline Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use (Yes/No) + FEV1 reversibility components + baseline smoking status + region + center (region). Center is included as a random effect nested within region. This analysis excludes values within 6 hours of rescue medication use or 7 days of systemic corticosteroid use. (NCT01613326)
Timeframe: 5 min to 4 hours post-dose at Day 1 and Week 12

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1 (n= 298, 292)Week 12 (n= 290, 282)
NVA2371.5751.577
Tiotropium1.5201.553

[back to top]

Inspiratory Capacity (IC) at Each Time-point, by Visit

IC was measured with spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. ANCOVA model: IC = treatment + baseline IC + baseline Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use (Yes/No) + FEV1 reversibility components + baseline smoking status + region + center(region). Center is included as a random effect nested within region. (NCT01613326)
Timeframe: (25 min, 1 h 55 min, 3 h 55 min, 23 h 40 min Day 1), (-20 min, 25 min, 23 h 40 min Week 4),(-20 min, 25 min, 1 h 55 min, 3 h 55 min, 23 h 40 min Week 12)

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1, 25 min (n= 216, 214)Day 1, 1 h 55 min (n= 212, 208)Day 1, 3 h 55 min (n= 211, 207)Day 1, 23 h 40 min (n= 213, 212)Week 4, -20 min (n= 204, 204)Week 4, 25 min (n= 201, 200)Week 4, 23 h 40 min (n=199,205)Week 12, -20 min (n= 205, 204)Week 12, 25 min (n= 215, 205)Week 12, 1 h 55 min (n= 213, 203)Week 12, 3 h 55 min (n= 203, 207)Week 12, 23 h 40 min (n= 208, 206)
NVA2372.3782.4332.3432.2472.2312.3352.2842.1982.2922.3442.3132.228
Tiotropium2.3002.3352.3092.2442.2402.3342.2892.2272.2802.2892.2752.262

[back to top]

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Time-point by Visit

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. FVC was assessed via spirometry. ANCOVA model: FVC = treatment + baseline FVC + baseline Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use (Yes/No) + FEV1 reversibility components + baseline smoking status + region + center(region). Center is included as a random effect nested within region. (NCT01613326)
Timeframe: (5,15,30 min, 1, 2,3,4 h, 23h 15 min and 23h 45 min postdose of Day 1), (-45, -15 min predose, 5,15,30 min, 1h, 23h 15 min and 23h 45 min postdose of Week 4), (-45, -15 min predose, 5,15,30 min, 1, 2, 3,4 h, 23h 15 min and 23h 45 min postdose of Week 12)

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1, 5 min (n= 283, 278)Day 1, 15 min (n= 282, 276)Day 1, 30 min (n= 285, 281)Day 1, 1 hour (n= 291, 286)Day 1, 2 hours (n= 290, 286)Day 1, 3 hours (n= 291, 285)Day 1, 4 hours (n= 285, 281)Day 1, 23 h 15 min (n= 289, 279)Day 1, 23 h 45 min (n= 285, 278)Week 4, -45 min (n= 280, 280)Week 4, -15 min (n= 278, 279)Week 4, 5 min (n= 277, 274)Week 4, 15 min (n= 271, 270)Week 4, 30 min (n= 272, 276)Week 4, 1 hr (n= 280, 282)Week 4, 23 h 15 min (n= 278, 276)Week 4, 23 h 45 min (n= 274, 276)Week 12, -45 min (n= 286, 279)Week 12, -15 min (n= 283, 279)Week 12, 5 min (n= 283, 271)Week 12, 15 min (n= 275, 271)Week 12, 30 min (n= 282, 278)Week 12, 1 hr (n= 286, 279)Week 12, 2 hours (n= 278, 277)Week 12, 3 hours (n= 281, 279)Week 12, 4 hours (n= 282, 280)Week 12, 23 h 15 min (n= 276, 266)Week 12, 23 h 45 min (n= 278, 276)
NVA2372.9253.0043.0363.0363.0613.1353.0732.9112.9422.9332.8792.9543.0213.0053.0682.9822.9532.8892.8272.9292.9452.9633.0113.0083.0142.9642.9232.929
Tiotropium2.8742.9542.9913.0063.0293.1113.0462.9512.9512.9432.8982.9973.0583.0113.0933.0132.9782.9052.8372.9532.9632.9823.0093.0123.0182.9772.9532.955

[back to top]

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Time-point by Visit

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. FEV1 was analyzed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model: FEV1 = treatment + baseline FEV1 + baseline Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use (Yes/No) + FEV1 reversibility components + baseline smoking status + region + center(region). Center is included as a random effect nested within region. (NCT01613326)
Timeframe: (5,15,30 min, 1, 2,3,4 h, 23h 15 min and 23h 45 min postdose of Day 1), (-45, -15 min predose, 5,15,30 min, 1h, 23h 15 min and 23h 45 min postdose of Week 4), (-45, -15 min predose, 5,15,30 min, 1, 2, 3,4 h, 23h 15 min and 23h 45 min postdose of Week 12)

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1, 5 min (n= 283, 278)Day 1, 15 min (n= 282, 276)Day 1, 30 min (n= 285, 281)Day 1, 1 hour (n= 291, 286)Day 1, 2 hours (n= 290, 286)Day 1, 3 hours (n= 291, 285)Day 1, 4 hours (n= 285, 281)Day 1, 23 h 15 min (n= 289, 279)Day 1, 23 h 45 min (n= 285, 278)Week 4, -45 min (n= 280, 280)Week 4, -15 min (n= 278, 279)Week 4, 5 min (n= 277, 274)Week 4, 15 min (n= 271, 270)Week 4, 30 min (n= 272, 276)Week 4, 1 hr (n= 280, 282)Week 4, 23 h 15 min (n= 278, 276)Week 4, 23 h 45 min (n= 274, 276)Week 12, -45 min (n= 286, 279)Week 12, -15 min (n= 283, 279)Week 12, 5 min (n= 283, 271)Week 12, 15 min (n= 275, 271)Week 12, 30 min (n= 282, 278)Week 12, 1 hr (n= 286, 279)Week 12, 2 hours (n= 278, 277)Week 12, 3 hours (n= 281, 279)Week 12, 4 hours (n= 282, 280)Week 12, 23 h 15 min (n= 276, 266)Week 12, 23 h 45 min (n= 278, 276)
NVA2371.3821.4281.4421.4821.5171.5271.4901.3841.3811.4031.3881.4221.4591.4541.5131.4221.4181.3941.3771.4301.4401.4611.5001.5071.5061.4731.4141.415
Tiotropium1.3311.3651.3791.4191.4541.4711.4481.3841.3791.3911.3931.4231.4661.4421.4941.4171.4161.3801.3701.4111.4231.4321.4751.4841.4841.4621.4221.420

[back to top]

Event Free Rate at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 After Treatment

Event free rate was calculated as a percentage of participants who did not experience any moderate or severe COPD exacerbation leading to hospitalization/treatment with systemic corticosteroids/treatment with antibiotics. The event free rate reflects the percent of patients who did NOT have an exacerbation by 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Event-free rates are calculated at the end of the specified weeks (i.e. Day 29, Day 57 and Day 85) by the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT01613326)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
NVA23795.692.990.2
Tiotropium96.693.892.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Used Over the 12 Week Treatment

"A day with no rescue medication use is defined from the diary data as any day where the patient recorded no rescue medicine use during the previous 12 hours.~Baseline mean daily, daytime and nighttime (combined) number of puffs is defined as the average of the respective number of puffs. Only patients with a value at both baseline and post-baseline visits were included." (NCT01613326)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1 to Week 12

,
Interventionpuffs (Mean)
BaselineDay 1 to week 12
NVA2374.092.76
Tiotropium4.102.84

[back to top]

Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Non-inferiority Analysis)

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation, measured through spirometry testing. The trough in FEV1 was defined as the mean of two measurements at 23hours 15min and 23 hours 45min post dosing. ANCOVA model: Trough FEV1 = treatment + baseline FEV1 + baseline Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use (Yes/No) + FEV1 reversibility components + baseline smoking status + region + center (region). This analysis excluded values within 6 hours of rescue medication use or 7 days of systemic corticosteroid use. (NCT01613326)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
NVA2371.405
Tiotropium1.405

[back to top]

Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Analysis of Superiority)

FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation, measured through spirometry testing. The trough in FEV1 was defined as the mean of two measurements at 23h 15min and 23h 45min post dosing. ANCOVA model: Trough FEV1 = treatment + baseline FEV1 + baseline Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use (Yes/No) + FEV1 reversibility components + baseline smoking status + region + center(region). This analysis excluded values within 6 hours of rescue medication use or 7 days of systemic corticosteroid. (NCT01613326)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
NVA2371.398
Tiotropium1.393

[back to top]

St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire Total Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment

St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a health related quality of life questionnaire consisting of 51 items in three areas: symptoms (respiratory symptoms and severity), activity (activities that cause or are limited by breathlessness) and impacts (social functioning and psychological disturbances due to airway disease). The total score is 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating poorer health status. ANCOVA model: SGRQ total score = treatment + baseline SGRQ score + baseline ICS use (Yes/No) + FEV1 reversibility components + baseline smoking status + region + center (region). (NCT01613326)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
NVA23739.42
Tiotropium38.77

[back to top]

Mean Daily, Daytime and Nighttime (Combined) Symptom Scores Over the 12 Week Treatment Period

Participants completed eDiaries providing scores 0 to 3 for symptoms: Cough and wheeze (none, mild, moderate, severe); sputum volume (none, less than 5 mL, 5-25 mL, >25 mL); sputum color (none, white-grey, yellow, green); lowest level of activity causing breathlessness (never or only when running, when walking uphill or upstairs, when walking on flat ground, at rest). Symptoms in the morning, for the previous night (no waking due to symptoms, woke up once due to symptoms, woke up more than once due to symptoms, woke up frequently or could not sleep due to symptoms). Symptoms experienced during the day that had prevented them for performing normal activities (not at all, a little, quite a lot, completely). The mean change from baseline in the total scores and in the individual scores was summarized by treatment. Only participants with a value at both baseline and post-baseline were included. Possible total scores 0-18 (night); 0-36 (day). A higher score means worsening of symptoms. (NCT01613326)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 1 to Week 12
NVA2377.215.96
Tiotropium6.905.96

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated 24 Hour Holter Findings

Twenty-four hour Holter ECG measurements were obtained using a 12-lead Holter monitor. The Holter monitor is worn by the participant for 24 hours, and the monitor continuously records the heart's rhythm while the monitor is worn. Following the 24-hour period, the data from the monitor were downloaded and transmitted to the centralized vendor for analysis and interpretation by a licensed cardiologist. The 24-hour Holter ECG measurements were obtained at during the screening period and on Day 14 of each treatment period. The number of participants with clinically significant change (abnormal or normal) were reported. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Day 14 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70)

,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
AbnormalNormal
Placebo635
UMEC 125 µg QD838
UMEC 15.6 µg BID732
UMEC 15.6 µg QD338
UMEC 250 µg QD834
UMEC 31.25 µg BID742
UMEC 31.25 µg QD744
UMEC 62.5 µg QD739

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Pre-treatment Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over Day 7 to Day 14 of Each Treatment Period

PEF is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF was measured by the participants daily in the morning and evening just prior to each dose, using an electronic peak flow meter, throughout the 14-day Treatment Period. Only the averaged daily AM and PM PEF over Days 7 to 14 was analyzed. The analysis was performed using a mixed effects analysis of covariance model with fixed effect terms for treatment and period; Baseline PEF AM and PM, gender and age fitted as covariates; and participant as a random effect. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 7 prior to each treatment period) and the last 7 days of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70)

,,,,,,,
InterventionLiters per minute (Mean)
AM, n=112, 120, 125, 122, 113, 116, 110, 122PM, n=116, 123, 123, 119, 115, 118, 108, 121
Placebo0.8-5.1
UMEC 125 µg QD6.49.8
UMEC 15.6 µg BID5.02.5
UMEC 15.6 µg QD5.210.0
UMEC 250 µg QD6.49.3
UMEC 31.25 µg BID5.88.7
UMEC 31.25 µg QD1.71.5
UMEC 62.5 µg QD1.1-0.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (BL) in the Weighted Mean (WM) 0-24 Hour FEV1 Obtained Post-AM Dose on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. The WM FEV1 was derived by calculating the area under the FEV1/time curve (AUC) using the trapezoidal rule, and then dividing the value by the time interval over which the AUC was calculated. Baseline is the 0h value obtained prior to the AM dose on Day 14 of the treatment period. Change from BL at a was calculated as WM at the evaluated time point minus BL. Analysis was performed using a mixed model, including treatment, period, period Baseline FEV1, and mean Baseline FEV1 as fixed effects and participant as a random effect. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 14 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70)

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.025
UMEC 15.6 µg QD0.060
UMEC 31.25 µg QD0.077
UMEC 62.5 µg QD0.092
UMEC 125 µg QD0.094
UMEC 250 µg QD0.048
UMEC 15.6 µg BID0.097
UMEC 31.25 µg BID0.043

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period

Blood pressure measurement included diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Blood pressure was measured in a sitting position after the participant was kept at rest for at least 5 minutes. Analysis was performed using a mixed model, including treatment, period, period Baseline and mean Baseline for the measure as fixed effects and participant as a random effect. Baseline is the value recorded pre-dose on Day 1 of each treatment period; mean Baseline is the mean of the Baselines for each participant and period Baseline is the difference between the Baseline and the mean Baseline in each treatment period for each participant. Change from Baseline was calculated as the assessment value at Day 14 minus the Baseline value. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 14 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70)

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.1
UMEC 15.6 µg QD-0.5
UMEC 31.25 µg QD-0.8
UMEC 62.5 µg QD-0.2
UMEC 125 µg QD0.3
UMEC 250 µg QD0.0
UMEC 15.6 µg BID0.6
UMEC 31.25 µg BID-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematocrit (proportion of red blood cells in blood) at Baseline and Day 14. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 14 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70)

InterventionProportion of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
Placebo-0.0093
UMEC 15.6 µg QD-0.0118
UMEC 31.25 µg QD-0.0075
UMEC 62.5 µg QD-0.0092
UMEC 125 µg QD-0.0082
UMEC 250 µg QD-0.0079
UMEC 15.6 µg BID-0.0084
UMEC 31.25 µg BID-0.0087

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period

Pulse rate was measured in a sitting position after the participant was kept at rest for at least 5 minutes. Analysis was performed using a mixed model, including treatment, period, period Baseline and mean Baseline for the measure as fixed effects and participant as a random effect. Baseline is the value recorded pre-dose on Day 1 of each treatment period; mean Baseline is the mean of the Baselines for each participant and period Baseline is the difference between the Baseline and the mean Baseline in each treatment period for each participant. Change from Baseline was calculated as the assessment value at Day 14 minus the Baseline value. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 14 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70)

InterventionBeats per minute (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.4
UMEC 15.6 µg QD-0.1
UMEC 31.25 µg QD1.2
UMEC 62.5 µg QD0.2
UMEC 125 µg QD0.2
UMEC 250 µg QD1.1
UMEC 15.6 µg BID-0.4
UMEC 31.25 µg BID-1.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period

Blood pressure measurement included systolic blood pressure (SBP). Blood pressure was measured in a sitting position after the participant was kept at rest for at least 5 minutes. Analysis was performed using a mixed model, including treatment, period, period Baseline and mean Baseline for the measure as fixed effects and participant as a random effect. Baseline is the value recorded pre-dose on Day 1 of each treatment period; mean Baseline is the mean of the Baselines for each participant and period Baseline is the difference between the Baseline and the mean Baseline in each treatment period for each participant. Change from Baseline was calculated as the assessment value at Day 14 minus the Baseline value. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 14 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70)

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.4
UMEC 15.6 µg QD-0.6
UMEC 31.25 µg QD-1.0
UMEC 62.5 µg QD1.1
UMEC 125 µg QD-0.6
UMEC 250 µg QD0.0
UMEC 15.6 µg BID0.3
UMEC 31.25 µg BID-1.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Puffs Per Day of Rescue Albuterol/Salbutamol Over Day 7 to Day 14 of Each Treatment Period

The mean number of puffs per day of rescue salbutamol at Baseline (i.e. run-in or washout data) and on-treatment were recorded. Total puffs was calculated as (Number of Puffs + (2 x number of Nebules)). Only the 7 days proceeding each treatment period were included in the Baseline calculations. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 7 prior to each treatment period) and the last 7 days of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70)

InterventionNumber of puffs (Mean)
Placebo-0.3
UMEC 15.6 µg QD-0.4
UMEC 31.25 µg QD-0.2
UMEC 62.5 µg QD-0.3
UMEC 125 µg QD-0.4
UMEC 250 µg QD-0.3
UMEC 15.6 µg BID-0.6
UMEC 31.25 µg BID-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 on Day 15 of Each Treatment Period

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 on Treatment Day 15 is defined as the value obtained 24 hours after the morning dose administered on Day 14. Analysis was performed using a mixed model, including treatment, period, period Baseline FEV1 and mean Baseline FEV1 as fixed effects and participant as a random effect. Baseline is the FEV1 value recorded pre-dose on Day 1 of each treatment period; mean Baseline is the mean of the Baselines for each participant and period Baseline is the difference between the Baseline and the mean Baseline in each treatment period for each participant. Change from Baseline for each treatment period is the trough FEV1 at Day 15 minus the Baseline value for that treatment period. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Day 15 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 71)

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.046
UMEC 15.6 µg QD0.112
UMEC 31.25 µg QD0.076
UMEC 62.5 µg QD0.080
UMEC 125 µg QD0.134
UMEC 250 µg QD0.057
UMEC 15.6 µg BID0.103
UMEC 31.25 µg BID0.097

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Asthma Exacerbations During the Treatment Period

Worsening of asthma symptoms is monitored throughout the study. Severe exacerbation (deterioration of asthma requiring use of systemic corticosteroids for 3 days, inpatient hospitalization or emergency department visit due to asthma) is an exclusion criterion and requires withdrawal from the study. Asthma symptoms were assessed daily using an electronic diary throughout study. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: From Baseline until the end of Treatment Period 3 (up to Study Day 70)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo2
UMEC 15.6 µg QD0
UMEC 31.25 µg QD0
UMEC 62.5 µg QD0
UMEC 125 µg QD0
UMEC 250 µg QD0
UMEC 15.6 µg BID1
UMEC 31.25 µg BID1

[back to top]

Urine pH on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period

Urine samples were collected for the measurement of urine pH by dipstick method at Day 14. Urine pH is an acid-base measurement. pH is measured on a numeric scale ranging from 0 to 14; values on the scale refer to the degree of alkalinity or acidity. A pH of 7 is neutral. A pH less than 7 is acidic, and a pH greater than 7 is basic. Normal urine has a slightly acid pH (5.0 - 6.0). (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Day 14 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Placebo5.89
UMEC 15.6 µg QD5.97
UMEC 31.25 µg QD6.05
UMEC 62.5 µg QD6.07
UMEC 125 µg QD5.90
UMEC 250 µg QD5.99
UMEC 15.6 µg BID5.89
UMEC 31.25 µg BID5.90

[back to top]

Urine Specific Gravity on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period

Urine samples were collected for the measurement of urine specific gravity by dipstick method at Day 14. Urine specific gravity is a measure of the concentration of solutes in the urine and provides information on the kidney's ability to concentrate urine. The concentration of the excreted molecules determines the urine's specific gravity. A urinary specific gravity measurement is a routine part of urinalysis. The reference range is 1.002-1.030. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Day 14 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70)

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Placebo1.0194
UMEC 15.6 µg QD1.0198
UMEC 31.25 µg QD1.0194
UMEC 62.5 µg QD1.0185
UMEC 125 µg QD1.0201
UMEC 250 µg QD1.0192
UMEC 15.6 µg BID1.0189
UMEC 31.25 µg BID1.0193

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Albumin, Total Protein, and Hemoglobin on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of albumin, total protein, and hemoglobin at Baseline and Day 14. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 14 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70))

,,,,,,,
InterventionGrams per liter (G/L) (Mean)
Albumin, n=111, 118, 120, 121, 112, 112, 112, 117Total protein, n=111,118,120,121,112,112,112,117Hemogloin, n=109,121,124,120,110,113,112,121
Placebo-1.1-1.9-2.2
UMEC 125 µg QD-1.1-1.9-1.8
UMEC 15.6 µg BID-0.6-1.1-1.3
UMEC 15.6 µg QD-1.0-1.9-2.8
UMEC 250 µg QD-1.0-1.8-1.4
UMEC 31.25 µg BID-0.7-1.2-2.0
UMEC 31.25 µg QD-0.8-1.4-1.6
UMEC 62.5 µg QD-0.9-1.7-2.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Creatine Kinase (CK), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) and Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of ALP, ALT, AST, CK, GGT, and LDH at Baseline and Day 14. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 14 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70)

,,,,,,,
InterventionInternational Units/Liter (IU/L) (Mean)
ALP, n=111, 118, 120, 121, 112, 112, 112, 117ALT, n=111, 117, 120, 121, 112, 112, 112, 117AST, n=110, 118, 120, 120, 112, 112, 112, 117CK, n=111, 118, 120, 121, 112, 112, 112, 117GGT, n=111, 118, 120, 121, 112, 112, 112, 117
Placebo-0.70.70.65.21.2
UMEC 125 µg QD-2.8-1.7-0.6-2.5-0.6
UMEC 15.6 µg BID-0.61.70.66.92.0
UMEC 15.6 µg QD-1.10.6-0.36.30.7
UMEC 250 µg QD-0.61.40.77.70.2
UMEC 31.25 µg BID-1.5-1.3-0.319.80.9
UMEC 31.25 µg QD-1.80.41.9143.00.4
UMEC 62.5 µg QD-2.0-0.1-0.4-10.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Total Neutrophils (ANC - Absolute Neutrophil Count), Platelet, and Leukocytes Count on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, total neutrophils (ANC - Absolute neutrophil [neut] count), platelet, and leucocytes count at Day 14. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 14 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70)

,,,,,,,
Intervention10^9 cells/Liter (GI/L) (Mean)
Basophil, n=109, 121, 124, 117, 110, 112, 111, 121Eosinophils, n= 109, 121, 124, 117,110,112,111,121Lymphocytes, n=109, 121, 124, 117,110,112,111,121Monocytes, n=109, 121, 124, 117, 110, 112, 111,121Total Neut, n= 109, 121, 124, 117, 110,112,111,121Segmented Neut, n=109,121,124,117,110,112,111,121Platelets,n=109, 121, 124, 119, 110, 112, 111, 119Leukocytes,n=109,121,124, 117, 110, 112, 111, 121
Placebo0.0030.097-0.0380.017-0.204-0.204-1.4-0.12
UMEC 125 µg QD0.0060.036-0.0430.029-0.161-0.161-2.1-0.14
UMEC 15.6 µg BID-0.0020.040-0.1560.010-0.133-0.133-2.2-0.24
UMEC 15.6 µg QD-0.0010.023-0.0640.0290.0320.032-0.70.01
UMEC 250 µg QD-0.0010.039-0.1520.0300.1070.107-8.40.02
UMEC 31.25 µg BID0.0000.039-0.069-0.000-0.080-0.080-1.0-0.11
UMEC 31.25 µg QD-0.0000.029-0.0500.0050.1190.119-1.00.10
UMEC 62.5 µg QD0.0010.036-0.0330.017-0.175-0.175-2.3-0.15

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Calcium, Chloride, Carbon Dioxide, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, and Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of chloride, caron dioxide, glucose, potassium, sodium, and urea/BUN at Baseline and Day 14. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 14 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70)

,,,,,,,
InterventionMicromoles/Liter (µM/L) (Mean)
Chloride, n=111, 118, 120, 121, 112, 112, 112, 117Carbon dioxide, n=110,118,120,120,112,112,112,117Glucose, n=111, 118, 120, 121, 112, 112, 112, 117Potassium, n=110, 118, 120, 120, 112, 112, 112,117Sodium, n=111, 118, 120, 121, 112, 112, 112, 117Urea/BUN, n=111, 118, 120, 121, 112, 112, 112, 117
Placebo0.1-0.60.010.02-0.20.11
UMEC 125 µg QD0.6-0.4-0.290.05-0.1-0.04
UMEC 15.6 µg BID0.3-0.5-0.090.08-0.20.02
UMEC 15.6 µg QD0.4-0.40.040.050.20.34
UMEC 250 µg QD0.3-0.0-0.080.02-0.30.20
UMEC 31.25 µg BID0.3-0.6-0.140.09-0.40.13
UMEC 31.25 µg QD0.4-0.6-0.150.05-0.00.02
UMEC 62.5 µg QD0.3-0.20.010.03-0.20.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, and Creatinine on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of direct bilirubin, indirect (ind) bilirubin, total bilirubin, and creatinine at Baseline and Day 14. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 14 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70)

,,,,,,,
InterventionMicromoles/Liter (µM/L) (Mean)
Direct bilirubin,n=111,118,120,121,112,112,112,117Bilirubin, n=111,118,120,121,112,112,112,117Ind Bilirubin, n=111,118,120,121,112,112,112,117Creatinine, n=111,118,120,121,112,112,112,117
Placebo-0.2-1.0-0.80.27
UMEC 125 µg QD-0.1-1.1-1.1-0.24
UMEC 15.6 µg BID-0.1-0.8-0.70.30
UMEC 15.6 µg QD-0.1-0.9-0.8-0.67
UMEC 250 µg QD-0.1-0.9-0.80.15
UMEC 31.25 µg BID-0.1-0.9-0.80.22
UMEC 31.25 µg QD-0.1-0.7-0.6-0.76
UMEC 62.5 µg QD-0.1-0.9-0.80.94

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Segmented Neutrophils in Blood on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of the percentage of basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and segmented neutrophils (neut) at Baseline and Day 14. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 14 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70)

,,,,,,,
InterventionPercentage of cells in blood (Mean)
Basophils, n=109,121,124,117,111,112,111,121Eosinophils, n= 109,121,124,117,110,112,111,121Lymphocytes, n=109,121,124,117,110,112,111,121Monocytes, n=109,121,124,117,110,112,111,121Neutrophils, n=109,121,124,117,110,112,111,121Segmented Neut, n=109,121,124,117,110,112,111,121
Placebo0.051.45-0.000.30-1.80-1.80
UMEC 125 µg QD0.080.56-0.060.52-1.11-1.11
UMEC 15.6 µg BID-0.020.65-0.760.43-0.30-0.30
UMEC 15.6 µg QD-0.010.30-0.640.45-0.11-0.11
UMEC 250 µg QD0.000.55-1.970.450.960.96
UMEC 31.25 µg BID0.000.56-0.460.07-0.17-0.17
UMEC 31.25 µg QD-0.020.32-0.290.04-0.04-0.04
UMEC 62.5 µg QD0.030.680.620.41-1.73-1.73

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Abnormal Electrocardiogram Findings

Electrocardiograph measurements performed at Screening (Visit 1) and at Day 1 and Day 14 (pre-dose, 10 minutes post-dose and 2 hours post-dose.of each treatment period). Any clinically significant findings were identified during participant monitoring. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Day 14 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70)

,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ConductionDepolarisation/Repolarisation(QRS-T)Myocardial InfarctionP-Wave and QRS MorphologyRhythm
Placebo14212012
UMEC 125 µg QD10321113
UMEC 15.6 µg BID7221217
UMEC 15.6 µg QD17203013
UMEC 250 µg QD11250015
UMEC 31.25 µg BID12282021
UMEC 31.25 µg QD10261015
UMEC 62.5 µg QD12202012

[back to top]

Change in Baseline in Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours After the Morning Dose on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period

Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry. Serial FEV1 was measured at 5, 15, 30 minutes (min), 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 16, 20, 23 and 24 hours (h) post-dose. Baseline is the 0h value obtained prior to the AM dose on Day 14 of the treatment period. Change from Baseline was calculated as FEV1 value at the evaluated time point minus Baseline. Analysis was preformed using a repeated measures model with terms for period, treatment, time, mean Baseline, period Baseline, and time by mean Baseline, time by period Baseline, and time by treatment interactions. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 14 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70)

,,,,,,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
5 min, n=41, 39, 49, 46, 44, 42, 38, 4815 min, n=41, 41, 51, 46, 46, 42, 39, 4930 min, n=45, 42, 39, 49, 45, 42, 39, 491 h, n=41, 41, 51, 46, 46, 42, 39, 493 h, n=41, 41, 51, 46, 46, 42, 39, 496 h, n=41, 40, 51, 46, 46, 42, 39, 489 h, n=41, 40, 51, 46, 46, 42, 39, 4912 h, n=41, 41, 51, 46, 46, 41, 39, 4916 h, n=40, 40, 51, 46, 46, 42, 38, 4920 h, n=40, 41, 51, 45, 46, 41, 39, 4923 h, n=40, 40, 51, 46, 46, 42, 39, 4824 h, n=41, 41, 51, 45, 46, 42, 39, 49
Placebo0.0240.0020.0120.0250.0000.007-0.049-0.044-0.074-0.1490.0130.039
UMEC 125 µg QD0.1230.1150.1490.1650.1430.1340.1170.0560.0350.0290.0870.139
UMEC 15.6 µg BID0.1410.1600.1580.1640.1820.1570.0720.0500.053-0.0050.0810.187
UMEC 15.6 µg QD0.0950.0820.1090.1270.1410.0990.0430.0150.006-0.0460.0330.105
UMEC 250 µg QD0.0420.0380.0400.1130.1430.0760.0810.0160.008-0.0500.0580.088
UMEC 31.25 µg BID0.1180.1080.1100.1680.1650.1000.0750.0560.009-0.0120.0370.124
UMEC 31.25 µg QD0.1100.1240.1150.1610.1750.0890.0610.0210.022-0.0030.0560.110
UMEC 62.5 µg QD0.0770.0900.0920.1430.1560.1080.1180.0600.0520.0570.1070.143

[back to top]

Final Dose-response Model for Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

Dose-response was conducted for both QD and BID UMEC doses on trough FEV1 (measure of lung function, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in 1 second) on D 15. Total daily dose of UMEC was used in the modeling. The null model was the final model. The null model is defined as: CFEV1,ij=(THETA1+ETA1j)*meanBL+(THETA2+ETA1j)*periodBL+EPSij, where CFEV1,ij represents the change from BL in trough FEV1 for participant j measured at period i. THETA1 and THETA2 were the slopes with respect to meanBL and periodBL, respectively. Omegas were the variance of the slopes on meanBL and periodBL (ETA1j, ETA2j) for each participant and Sigma was the variance of the residual errors (EPSij). MeanBL is the mean of the Baseline (BL) which is the FEV1 value recorded pre-dose on D 1 of each TP; periodBL is the difference between the BL and the meanBL in each TP for each participant. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Day 15 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 71)

Interventionunitless (Geometric Mean)
Theta1 (mean Baseline)Theta2 (period Baseline)Omega (mean Baseline)Omega (period Baseline)Sigma (Variance of Residual error)
All Study Treatments0.0363-0.970.003710.1490.0393

[back to top]

Number of Participants for the Indicated Urinalysis Parameters Tested by Dipstick on Day 14 of Each Treatment Period

Urinalysis parameters included: Urine Bilirubin (UB), Urine Occult Blood (UOB), Urine Glucose (UG), Urine Ketones (UK), Urine Nitrite (UN), Urine Protein (UP), and Urine Leukocyte Esterase test for detecting White Blood Cell (UWBC). The dipstick was a strip used to detect the presence or absence of these parameters in the urine sample. The dipstick test gives results in a semi-quantitative manner, and results for urinalysis parameters can be read as negative (Neg), Trace (T), 1+, 2+, and 3+, and for UG the result can be read as Neg, T, T or 1/10 G/dL, 1+ or 1/4 G/dL, 3+ or 1 G/dL, indicating proportional concentrations in the urine sample. Data are reported as the number of participants who had neg, T, 1+, 2+ and 3+ levels at Day 14. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 14 of each treatment period (up to Study Day 70))

,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
UB, Neg, n=109,121,125,120,112, 113,112,119UOB, T, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UOB, 1+, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UOB, 2+, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UOB, 3+, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UOB, Neg, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UG, T, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UG, T or 1/10, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UG, 1+ or 1/4, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UG, 3+ or 1, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UG, Neg, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UK, T, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UK, Neg, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UK, 1+, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UK, 2+, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UK, 3+, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UN, Neg, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UN, Pos, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UP, Neg, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UP, T, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UP, 1+, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UP, 2+, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UWBC, Neg, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UWBC, T, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UWBC, 1+, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UWBC, 2+, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119UWBC, 3+, n=109,121,125,120,112,113,112,119
Placebo10985568500111074103101971299442886645
UMEC 125 µg QD11213504900000112810400010841026408281255
UMEC 15.6 µg BID1128532940001111211000010391074108954113
UMEC 15.6 µg QD1218813101111011831180001138112621965983
UMEC 250 µg QD11211713911000112011210010941083208851280
UMEC 31.25 µg BID11913223990000119311312010514111440851110121
UMEC 31.25 µg QD1251443110310001245119010116911086110061252
UMEC 62.5 µg QD12012521100000111921160111081211621190111233

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of SAEs. (NCT01641692)
Timeframe: From Baseline until the end of Treatment Period 3 (up to Study Day 70)

,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEAny SAE
Placebo150
UMEC 125 µg QD260
UMEC 15.6 µg BID160
UMEC 15.6 µg QD120
UMEC 250 µg QD281
UMEC 31.25 µg BID120
UMEC 31.25 µg QD130
UMEC 62.5 µg QD210

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Scoring Index at Day 5 and Day 8

The clinical scoring index was assessed at Baseline (Visit 1), Day 5 and Day 8. The score assigned represented the sum of the score for each of four signs: respiratory rate, wheezing, inspiration/expiration ratio, and accessory muscle use. Each of these parameters were scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate and 3=severe. The total score ranged from 0 to 12, where 0 indicated absence of symptoms and 12 indicated most severe symptoms. The Baseline value was the last non-missing value prior to randomization. Change from Baseline was calculated/defined as value at the indicated visit minus value at the Baseline. A negative value of change in score from Baseline indicated improvement in severity of symptoms. If participants discontinued before or on Day 5, then the clinical scoring index collected at the early withdrawal visit was included in the Visit 2. Otherwise, the clinical scoring index collected at the early withdrawal visit was included in the Visit 3 (NCT01687296)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 5 and Day 8

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Day 5Day 8
Fluticasone Propionate-2.7-3.4
Prednisone-2.6-3.4

[back to top]

Mean Global Evaluation for Efficacy by Participant/Parent and Investigator

At Visit 3 (Day 8), participant/parent and investigator were asked to evaluate efficacy globally as very beneficial=1, beneficial=2, no effect=3 or worse=4. The global evaluation collected at the early withdrawal visit was included in the Visit 3. If participants were discontinued at Visit 2, then the global evaluation collected at the Visit 2 is also included in the Visit 3 for summary and analysis. (NCT01687296)
Timeframe: Day 8

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Participant/parent global evaluationInvestigator global evaluation
Fluticasone Propionate1.51.5
Prednisone1.51.5

[back to top]

Mean Evening PEF on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period

PEF is the maximum flow generated during a forceful exhalation, starting from full lung inflation. Participants recorded on diary card the best of three PEF measurements, using a mini-Wright peak flow meter in the evening (6:00-9:00 post meridiem [PM]) before taking any study drug. Only data that was drawn from Days 1/2 to 8 after randomization and before or on the end date of study drug was used for analysis. If participants started to take the study drug in the morning (early or on 12:00 PM), only then the evening PEF on the date of randomization was used. The outcome measure was considered missing if less than 2 days was recorded in the given treatment assessment period. Two participants from fluticasone propionate group and 5 participants from prednisone group had the missing outcome measure. Analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to gender, age, centre and treatment group. (NCT01687296)
Timeframe: Days 1/2 to 8

InterventionL/min (Least Squares Mean)
Fluticasone Propionate195.79
Prednisone194.63

[back to top]

Mean Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (AM PEF) on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period in Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population

PEF is the maximum flow generated during a forceful exhalation, starting from full lung inflation. Participants (if needed with the help of parents or guardian) recorded on diary card the best of three PEF measurements, using a mini-Wright peak flow meter in the morning before taking any study drug. Only data that was drawn from Days 2 to 8 after randomization and on or before one day after the end date of study drug was used for analysis. The outcome measure was considered missing if less than 2 days were recorded in the given treatment assessment period. Two participants from fluticasone propionate group and 4 participants from prednisone group had the missing outcome measure. Analysis was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with effects due to gender, age, centre and treatment group. (NCT01687296)
Timeframe: Days 2 to 8

InterventionLitres per minute (L/min) (Least Squares Mean)
Fluticasone Propionate188.77
Prednisone188.31

[back to top]

Mean Morning PEF on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period in Per Protocol (PP) Population

PEF is the maximum flow generated during a forceful exhalation, starting from full lung inflation. Participants (if needed with the help of parents or guardian) recorded on diary card the best of three PEF measurements, using a mini-Wright peak flow meter in the morning before talking any study drug. Only data that was drawn from Days 2 to 8 after randomization and on or before one day after the end date of study drug was used for analysis. The outcome measure was considered missing if less than 2 days were recorded in the given treatment assessment period. Two participants from fluticasone propionate group and 5 participants from prednisone group had the missing outcome measure. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with effects due to gender, age ,centre and treatment group. (NCT01687296)
Timeframe: Days 2 to 8

InterventionL/min (Least Squares Mean)
Fluticasone Propionate189.46
Prednisone188.96

[back to top]

Median Number of Use of Rescue Medications During Day and Night Over the Treatment Assessment Period

The use of nebulized salbutamol (doses/puffs and frequency) were recorded on diary card in the morning and evening. The median numbers of times of use of rescue medication during day and night was calculated for each participant over the treatment assessment period. In each case, only data that was from Days 2 to 8 after randomization and before or on the end date of study drug was used. The outcome measure was considered missing if less than 2 days (that is., 24-hour periods) were recorded in the given treatment assessment period. The analysis only includes participants who have at least 2 days of non-missing numbers of times rescue medication (including zero) in the given treatment assessment period. (NCT01687296)
Timeframe: Days 2 to 8

InterventionNumber of use of rescue medication (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate2.0
Prednisone2.0

[back to top]

Clinical Assessment of Lung Function of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) During the Treatment Period

Spirometric assessments of FEV1 and FVC were assessed at clinic visit 1 (Screening), 2 (Day 5) and 3 (Day 8). Lung function tests were performed at the approximately same time at each visit in the morning. Participants were instructed to withhold salbutamol therapy for at least 4 hour, and the highest of three FEV1 and FVC measurements were recorded. If participants discontinued before or on Day 5, then the FEV1 and FVC collected at the early withdrawal visit is included in the Visit 2. Otherwise, the FEV1, FVC collected at the early withdrawal visit was included in the Visit 3. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA with covariates of gender, centre, age and treatment. (NCT01687296)
Timeframe: During the treatment period at Day 5, Day 8

,
InterventionLitres (Least Squares Mean)
FEV1, Day 5FEV1, Day 8FVC, Day 5FVC, Day 8
Fluticasone Propionate1.2881.4001.4761.544
Prednisone1.3311.3961.5431.582

[back to top]

Median Day-time and Night-time Symptom Scores Over the Treatment Assessment Period

The symptoms of cough, sputum production, wheeze and dyspnoea were assessed in morning and evening, and recorded on participant diary cards. Day-time symptoms were scored while retiring to bed on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (severe). Night-time symptoms were scored while waking in the morning on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (severe). For day-time score, only data that was from Days 2 to 8 after randomization and before or on the end date of study drug was used. For night-time score, only data that are from Days 2 to 8 after randomization and on or before one day after the end date of study drug was used. The outcome measure was considered missing if less than 2 days were recorded in the given treatment assessment period. The analysis only includes participants with at least 2 days of non-missing symptom scores in the given treatment assessment period. (NCT01687296)
Timeframe: Days 2 to 8

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Day-time symptom scoreNight-time symptom score
Fluticasone Propionate0.50.0
Prednisone1.00.0

[back to top]

Variability in Daily Inspiratory Capacity (IC), Estimated by Coefficient of Variation

IC is the the total amount of air that can be drawn into the lungs after normal expiration. During each study period, pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry for evaluation of IC was performed at study visits as follows: prior to administration of the first short-acting bronchodilator, approximately 1 hour after administration of the first bronchodilator (1 hour), and approximately 1 hour after administration of the second short-acting bronchodilator (2 hours). Variability in daily IC was measured as the fluctuation around the mean IC data collected from Day 1 to Day 10. Variability was measured by the coefficent of variation (CV) and the half range. The CV is the dispersion of the data around the mean, whereas the half range method is the difference between the maximum and minimum IC values. (NCT01691482)
Timeframe: up to 10 days

,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
Pre-dose/non-bronchodilatorAlbuterol/Salbutamol (A/S) alone, 1 hourA/S followed by ipratropium (A+I), 2 hoursIpratropium alone, 1 hourIpratropium followed by A/S (I+A), 2 hours
Albuterol/Salbutamol Followed by Ipratropium0.0780.0690.070NANA
Ipratropium Followed by Albuterol/Salbutamol0.083NANA0.0720.066

[back to top]

Variability in Daily IC, Estimated by Half Range (i.e., Half the Difference Between Maximum and Minimum)

IC is the the total amount of air that can be drawn into the lungs after normal expiration. During each study period, pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry for evaluation of IC was performed at study visits as follows: prior to administration of the first short-acting bronchodilator, approximately 1 hour after administration of the first bronchodilator (1 hour), and approximately 1 hour after administration of the second short-acting bronchodilator (2 hours). Variability in daily IC was measured as the fluctuation around the mean IC data collected from Day 1 to Day 10. Variability was measured by the coefficent of variation (CV) and the half range. The CV is the dispersion of the data around the mean, whereas the half range method is half the difference between the maximum and minimum IC values. (NCT01691482)
Timeframe: up to 10 days

,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
Pre-dose/non-bronchodilatorAlbuterol/Salbutamol (A/S) alone, 1 hourA/S followed by ipratropium, 2 hoursIpratropium alone, 1 hourIpratropium followed by A/S, 2 hours
Albuterol/Salbutamol Followed by Ipratropium0.2250.2290.233NANA
Ipratropium Followed by Albuterol/Salbutamol0.236NANA0.2350.221

[back to top]

Variability in Daily FEV1, Estimated by Coefficient of Variation

FEV1 is the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. During each study period, pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry for evaluation of FEV1 was performed at study visits as follows: prior to administration of the first short-acting bronchodilator, approximately 1 hour after administration of the first bronchodilator (1 hour), and approximately 1 hour after administration of the second short-acting bronchodilator (2 hours). Variability in daily FEV1 was measured as the fluctuation around the mean FEV1 data collected from Day 1 to Day 10. Variability was measured by the coefficient of variation (CV) and the half range. The CV is the dispersion of the data around the mean, whereas the half range method is the difference between the maximum and minimum FEV1 values. (NCT01691482)
Timeframe: up to 10 days

,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
Pre-dose/non-bronchodilatorAlbuterol/Salbutamol (A/S) alone, 1 hourA/S followed by ipratropium, 2 hoursIpratropium alone, 1 hourIpratropium followed by A/S, 2 hours
Albuterol/Salbutamol Followed by Ipratropium0.0810.0590.054NANA
Ipratropium Followed by Albuterol/Salbutamol0.079NANA0.0720.063

[back to top]

The Maximal Bronchodilator Response for the First Administered Agent

The maximal bronchodilator response for the first administered agent is defined as the FEV1 (the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second) 1 hour post-dose of the first bronchodilator minus the pre-dose. The maximal bronchodilator response for the second agent is defined as the FEV1 1 hour post-dose of the second bronchodilator minus the FEV1 at 1 hour post-dose of the first bronchodilator. The maximal bronchodilator response for the combination is defined as the FEV1 (the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second) at 1 hour post-administration of the second bronchodilator minus the corresponding pre-dose FEV1. Derived FEV1 response is FEV1 change from 0 hours (0H) for the first agent assessment (at 1 hour [1H]); change from 1H for the second agent assessment (at 2 hours [2H]); and change from 0H for the combination assessment (at 2H). Data were adjusted for FEV1, smoking status, and center. (NCT01691482)
Timeframe: up to 10 days

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
First agent, albuterol/salbutamol (A/S)First agent, ipratropiumSecond agent, A/SSecond agent, ipratropiumA/S followed by ipratropiumIpratropium followed by A/S
All Randomized Participants0.2690.2430.0940.0940.3630.337

[back to top]

Percentage of Days for Which Participants Achieved a Threshold Increase From Baseline in FEV1 of 100 mL, 200 mL, and 250 mL

FEV1 is the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. During each study period, pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry for evaluation of FEV1 was performed at study visits as follows: approximately 1 hour after administration of the first bronchodilator (1 hour), and approximately 1 hour after administration of the second short-acting bronchodilator (2 hours). (NCT01691482)
Timeframe: up to 35 days

,
Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
A/S alone, 1 hour, 100 mLA/S followed by ipratropium, 2 hours, 100 mLIpratropium alone, 1 hour, 100 mLIpratropium followed by A/S, 2 hours, 100 mLA/S alone, 1 hour, 200 mLA/S followed by ipratropium, 2 hours, 200 mLIpratropium alone, 1 hour, 200 mLIpratropium followed by A/S, 2 hours, 200 mLA/S alone, 1 hour, 250 mLA/S followed by ipratropium, 2 hours, 250 mLIpratropium alone, 1 hour, 250 mLIpratropium followed by A/S, 2 hours, 250 mL
Albuterol/Salbutamol Followed by Ipratropium81.685.2NANA59.272.7NANA45.964.0NANA
Ipratropium Follwed by Albuterol/SalbutamolNANA72.981.2NANA56.070.5NANA45.859.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Days for Which Participants Achieved a >=12% and 200 Milliliter (mL) Increase From Baseline in FEV1

FEV1 is the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. During each study period, pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry for evaluation of FEV1 was performed at study visits as follows: approximately 1 hour after administration of the first bronchodilator (1 hour), and approximately 1 hour after administration of the second short-acting bronchodilator (2 hours). (NCT01691482)
Timeframe: up to 35 days

,
Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Albuterol/Salbutamol (A/S) alone, 1 hourA/S followed by ipratropium, 2 hoursIpratropium alone, 1 hourIpratropium followed by A/S, 2 hours
Albuterol/Salbutamol Followed by Ipratropium58.471.7NANA
Ipratropium Follwed by Albuterol/SalbutamolNANA55.469.1

[back to top]

Variability in Daily FEV1, Estimated by Half Range (i.e., Half the Difference Between Maximum and Minimum Values)

FEV1 is the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. During each study period, pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry for evaluation of FEV1 was performed at study visits as follows: prior to administration of the first short-acting bronchodilator, approximately 1 hour after administration of the first bronchodilator (1 hour), and approximately 1 hour after administration of the second short-acting bronchodilator (2 hours). Variability in daily FEV1 was measured as the fluctuation around the mean FEV1 data collected from Day 1 to Day 10. Variability was measured by the coefficient of variation (CV) and the half range. The CV is the dispersion of the data around the mean, whereas the half range method is half the difference between the maximum and minimum FEV1 values. (NCT01691482)
Timeframe: up to 10 days

,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
Pre-dose/non-bronchodilatorAlbuterol/Salbutamol (A/S) alone, 1 hourA/S followed by ipratropium, 2 hoursIpratropium alone, 1 hourIpratropium followed by A/S, 2 hours
Albuterol/Salbutamol Followed by Ipratropium0.1360.1250.122NANA
Ipratropium Followed by Albuterol/Salbutamol0.135NANA0.1450.137

[back to top]

Participants With Adverse Experiences During Weeks 13-52 (Open-Label Period)

Adverse events (AEs) summarized in this table are those that began or worsened after treatment with study drug (treatment-emergent AEs). An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. (NCT01698320)
Timeframe: Weeks 13-52

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventSevere adverse eventTreatment-related adverse eventDeathsOther serious adverse eventsWithdrawn from treatment due to adverse events
Albuterol MDPI-Albuterol MDPI94131042
Placebo MDPI-Albuterol MDPI106122032

[back to top]

Participants With Adverse Experiences During Weeks 0-12 (Double-Blind Period)

Adverse events (AEs) summarized in this table are those that began or worsened after treatment with study drug (treatment-emergent AEs). An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. (NCT01698320)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventSevere adverse eventTreatment-related adverse eventDeathsOther serious adverse eventsWithdrawn from treatment due to adverse events
Albuterol MDPI-Albuterol MDPI8435001
Placebo MDPI-Albuterol MDPI10561011

[back to top]

Participants With Abnormal and Clinically Relevant Physical Exam Findings at Weeks 0, 12 and 52

"The physical exam was performed by a qualified healthcare professional, and when possible, the same qualified healthcare professional that performed the physical examination at study screening performed all the scheduled physical examinations. Abnormalities and clinical relevance were determined by the qualified healthcare professional.~HEENT = head, eyes, ears, nose, throat" (NCT01698320)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 12 and 52

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
General appearance - Week 0 (n=170, 167)General appearance - Week 12 (n=166, 155)General appearance - Week 52 (n=162, 161)HEENT - Week 0 (n=170, 167)HEENT - Week 12 (n=166, 155)HEENT - Week 52 (n=162, 161)Chest and lungs - Week 0 (n=170, 167)Chest and lungs - Week 12 (n=166, 155)Chest and lungs - Week 52 (n=162, 161)Heart - Week 0 (n=170, 167)Heart - Week 12 (n=166, 155)Heart - Week 52 (n=162, 161)Abdomen - Week 0 (n=168, 167)Abdomen - Week 12 (n=166, 155)Abdomen - Week 52 (n=162, 161)Musculoskeletal - Week 0 (n=169, 167)Musculoskeletal - Week 12 (n=166, 155)Musculoskeletal - Week 52 (n=162, 161)Skin - Week 0 (n=169, 167)Skin - Week 12 (n=167, 155)Skin - Week 52 (n=162, 161)Lymph Nodes - Week 0 (n=169, 167)Lymph Nodes - Week 120 (n=166, 155)Lymph Nodes - Week 52 (n=162, 161)Neurological - Week 0 (n=169, 167)Neurological - Week 12 (n=166, 155)Neurological - Week 52 (n=162, 161)Extremities/back - Week 0 (n=169, 167)Extremities/back - Week 12 (n=166, 155)Extremities/back - Week 52 (n=162, 160)
Albuterol MDPI-Albuterol MDPI000012012000001000000000000000
Placebo MDPI-Albuterol MDPI010012013000000000000000000000

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Measurements to Week 12 and Week 52

"Participants were seated at least 2 minutes before pulse measurements were obtained by radial pulse.~Week 12 values represent change from Week 0. Week 52 values represent change from Week 12." (NCT01698320)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 12 and Week 52

,
Interventionbeats/minute (Mean)
Pulse Week 12 (n=166, 155)Pulse Week 52 (n=159, 155)
Albuterol MDPI-Albuterol MDPI0.9-0.3
Placebo MDPI-Albuterol MDPI-0.1-0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure Measurements to Week 12 and Week 52

"Participants were seated at least 2 minutes before blood pressure measurements were obtained by either an electronic or manual sphygmomanometer.~Week 12 values represent change from Week 0. Week 52 values represent change from Week 12." (NCT01698320)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 12 and Week 52

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Systolic BP Week 12 (n=166, 155)Systolic BP Week 52 (n=159, 155)Diastolic BP Week 12 (n=166, 155)Diastolic BP Week 52 (n=159, 155)
Albuterol MDPI-Albuterol MDPI0.20.70.31.0
Placebo MDPI-Albuterol MDPI1.0-0.40.00.2

[back to top]

Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results At Weeks 0, 12, and 52

A standard 12-lead ECG was performed at screening, week 12, and week 52 or early termination/discontinuation. The ECG recording methods were centralized and standardized across all study participants. A centralized cardiologist was responsible for providing all ECG interpretations. (NCT01698320)
Timeframe: Weeks 0 (screening visit), 12, and 52

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 0: NormalWeek 0: Abnormal, not clinically relevantWeek 0: Abnormal, clinically relevantWeek 12: Normal (n=166, 155)Week 12: Abnormal, not clinically relevantWeek 12: Abnormal, clinically relevantWeek 52: Normal (n=152, 161)Week 52: Abnormal, not clinically relevantWeek 52: Abnormal, clinically relevant
Albuterol MDPI-Albuterol MDPI154140140150148130
Placebo MDPI-Albuterol MDPI151190143230138231

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 on Treatment Day 85

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the volume of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 is defined as the 24-hour FEV1 assessment, which was obtained on Day 85. Baseline trough was calculated as the mean of the two assessments made 30 minutes pre-dose and 5 minutes pre-dose on Treatment Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the average of the Day 85 values minus the Baseline value. The analysis used an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with covariates of Baseline FEV1, reversibility stratum, smoking status (at Screening), country, and treatment. (NCT01706328)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 85

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
FF/VI 100/25 µg QD0.151
FP/Salmeterol 250/50 µg BID0.121

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Trough in Weighted-mean 24-hour Serial Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) on Treatment Day 84

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the volume of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. The weighted mean was calculated from the pre-dose FEV1 and the post-dose FEV1 measurements taken at 5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 13, 14, 16, 20, and 24 hours on Treatment Day 84. Baseline trough FEV1 was calculated as the mean of the two assessments made 30 minutes pre-dose and 5 minutes pre-dose on Treatment Day 1. The weighted mean was derived by calculating the area under curve, and then dividing by the relevant time interval. The weighted mean change from Baseline was calculated as the weighted mean of the 24-hour serial FEV1 measurements on Day 84 minus the Baseline trough FEV1 value. The analysis used an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with covariates of Baseline FEV1, reversibility stratum, smoking status (at Screening), country, and treatment. (NCT01706328)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
FF/VI 100/25 µg QD0.168
FP/Salmeterol 250/50 µg BID0.142

[back to top]

Time to Onset on Treatment Day 1

Time to onset on Treatment Day 1 is defined as the time to an increase of 100 milliliters (mL) from Baseline in FEV1 during the 0- to 4-hour serial measurements (5, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes post-dose). Participants who never met or exceeded a 100 mL increase over the Baseline value during the 4-hour serial measurements were censored at the actual time of their last FEV1 measurement. (NCT01706328)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1

InterventionMinutes (Median)
FF/VI 100/25 µg QD15
FP/Salmeterol 250/50 µg BID15

[back to top]

ANALYSIS OF LUNG DEPOSITION - Penetration Index

Images of the lungs will be taken for radiolabelled salbutamol treatment. The images will be processed using computer software and the lungs divided into central airways (C - region) and peripheral airways (P -region). We will analyse the amount of radiolabelled salbutamol in each region and calculate how deep into the lungs the inhaled salbutamol has reached by using the ratio C/P which is known as the Penetration Index. (NCT01721291)
Timeframe: 5 MINUTES AFTER INHALATION OF SALBUTAMOL

Interventionratio (Mean)
Healthy_1.5um Slow0.8
Healthy_1.5um Fast0.72
COPD 1_1.5um Slow0.69
COPD1_1.5um Fast0.58
Healthy_3um Slow0.75
Healthy_3um Fast0.63
COPD_3um Slow0.65
COPD_3um Fast0.48
Healthy_6um Slow0.51
Healthy_6um Fast0.46
COPD_6um Slow0.37
COPD_6um Fast0.32

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) for Albuterol on Days 1 and 8

Pharmacokinetic parameters of albuterol were determined on Day 1 after the first dose administration and at steady-state on Day 8. Day 1 serial (10-hr) blood samples for pharmacokinetics pre-dose (within 30 minutes prior to dosing), and post-dose at the following times: 15 (±5) min, 30 (±5) min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours (±10 minutes). Day 8 serial (6-hr) blood samples for pharmacokinetics pre-dose (within 30 min prior to dosing), and post-dose at the following times: 15 (±5) min, 30 (±5) min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 hr (±10 min). (NCT01747629)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 8

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Day 1Day 8
Albuterol MDPI347.2499.1

[back to top]

Participants With Adverse Events

Adverse events (AEs) summarized in this table are those that began or worsened after treatment with study drug (treatment-emergent AEs). An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. (NCT01747629)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 93

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventSevere adverse eventTreatment-related adverse eventDeathsOther serious adverse eventWithdrawn from study due to adverse event
Albuterol MDPI2211022
Placebo MDPI3632001

[back to top]

Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Assessments

"For both standard and serial vital signs, participants were seated for at least 5 minutes before vital signs were assessed. Heart rate was obtained prior to the blood pressure measurement. Serial heart rate and blood pressure were conducted in the sitting position prior to the spirometry assessment; baseline measures were taken pre-dose at -30 ± 5 and -5 minutes on Day 1. Day 85 serial vital sign measures were taken in the sitting position prior to spirometry assessments pre-dose at -30 ± 5 and -5 minutes, then post-dose at 30 (±5) minutes, 1hr (± 10 min), 2hr (± 10 min), 3hr (± 10 min), 4hr (± 10 min), 5hr (± 10 min) and 6 hr (± 10 min).~Serial heart rate and blood pressure measurements that were elevated to the following criteria were considered clinically significant:~Systolic blood pressure: > 160 beats/minute Diastolic blood pressure: >100 beats/minute Heart rate: >120 beats/minute" (NCT01747629)
Timeframe: Days 8 and 85

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Systolic blood pressure - highDiastolic blood pressure - highHeart rate - high
Albuterol MDPI320
Placebo MDPI220

[back to top]

Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6) on Day 1

"FEV1 AUC 0-6 is the area under the effect-time curve from time 0 (pre-dose) up to 6 hours post-dose. It represents the weighted average over six hours of the FEV1 AUC 0-6 measures adjusted for the baseline measure. The baseline was the average of the 2 pre-dose FEV1 measurements on that study day.~FEV1 was measured using spirometry. Spirometry assessments were obtained predose at -30 ± 5, and - 5 minutes, then post dose at 5 ± 2, 15 ± 5, 30 ± 5, 45 ± 5 minutes, and at 1hr ± 5 min, 2hr ± 5 min, 3hr ± 5 min, 4hr ± 5 min, 5hr ± 5 min, and 6hr ± 5 min." (NCT01747629)
Timeframe: Day 1

InterventionL*hr (Mean)
Placebo MDPI0.58
Albuterol MDPI1.63

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 (Pre-dose) to 24 Hours Post-dose(AUC0-24) for Albuterol on Day 8

Pharmacokinetic parameters of albuterol were determined on Day 1 after the first dose administration and at steady-state on Day 8. Day 1 serial (10-hr) blood samples for pharmacokinetics pre-dose (within 30 minutes prior to dosing), and post-dose at the following times: 15 (±5) min, 30 (±5) min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours (±10 minutes). Day 8 serial (6-hr) blood samples for pharmacokinetics pre-dose (within 30 min prior to dosing), and post-dose at the following times: 15 (±5) min, 30 (±5) min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 hr (±10 min). (NCT01747629)
Timeframe: Day 8

Interventionpg*hr/mL (Mean)
Albuterol MDPI3605

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 (Pre-dose) to Infinity Post-dose(AUC0-inf) for Albuterol on Day 1

Pharmacokinetic parameters of albuterol were determined on Day 1 after the first dose administration and at steady-state on Day 8. Day 1 serial (10-hr) blood samples for pharmacokinetics pre-dose (within 30 minutes prior to dosing), and post-dose at the following times: 15 (±5) min, 30 (±5) min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours (±10 minutes). Day 8 serial (6-hr) blood samples for pharmacokinetics pre-dose (within 30 min prior to dosing), and post-dose at the following times: 15 (±5) min, 30 (±5) min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 hr (±10 min). (NCT01747629)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionpg*hr/mL (Mean)
Albuterol MDPI2278

[back to top]

Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6) on Day 8

"FEV1 AUC 0-6 is the area under the effect-time curve from time 0 (pre-dose) up to 6 hours post-dose. It represents the weighted average over six hours of the FEV1 AUC 0-6 measures adjusted for the baseline measure. The baseline was the average of the 2 pre-dose FEV1 measurements on that study day.~FEV1 was measured using spirometry. Spirometry assessments were obtained predose at -30 ± 5, and - 5 minutes, then post dose at 5 ± 2, 15 ± 5, 30 ± 5, 45 ± 5 minutes, and at 1hr ± 5 min, 2hr ± 5 min, 3hr ± 5 min, 4hr ± 5 min, 5hr ± 5 min, and 6hr ± 5 min." (NCT01747629)
Timeframe: Day 8

InterventionL*hr (Mean)
Placebo MDPI0.37
Albuterol MDPI1.15

[back to top]

Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6) on Day 85

"FEV1 AUC 0-6 is the area under the effect-time curve from time 0 (pre-dose) up to 6 hours post-dose. It represents the weighted average over six hours of the FEV1 AUC 0-6 measures adjusted for the baseline measure. The baseline was the average of the 2 pre-dose FEV1 measurements on that study day.~FEV1 was measured using spirometry. Spirometry assessments were obtained predose at -30 ± 5, and - 5 minutes, then post dose at 5 ± 2, 15 ± 5, 30 ± 5, 45 ± 5 minutes, and at 1hr ± 5 min, 2hr ± 5 min, 3hr ± 5 min, 4hr ± 5 min, 5hr ± 5 min, and 6hr ± 5 min." (NCT01747629)
Timeframe: Day 85

InterventionL*hr (Mean)
Placebo MDPI0.20
Albuterol MDPI1.12

[back to top]

Baseline-adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-6) Over the 12-week Treatment Period

"FEV1 AUC 0-6 is the area under the effect-time curve from time 0 (pre-dose) up to 6 hours post-dose. It represents the weighted average (by the trapezoidal rule) over six hours of the FEV1 AUC 0-6 measures adjusted for the baseline measure (i.e., change from baseline at each timepoint) recorded on days 1, 8 and 85 of the treatment period. The baseline for each study day was the average of the 2 pre-dose FEV1 measurements on that study day.~FEV1 was measured using spirometry. Spirometry assessments were obtained predose at -30 ± 5, and - 5 minutes, then post dose at 5 ± 2, 15 ± 5, 30 ± 5, 45 ± 5 minutes, and at 1hr ± 5 min, 2hr ± 5 min, 3hr ± 5 min, 4hr ± 5 min, 5hr ± 5 min, and 6hr ± 5 min." (NCT01747629)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 85

InterventionL*hr (Mean)
Placebo MDPI0.38
Albuterol MDPI1.30

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 (Pre-dose) to Last Time of Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) for Albuterol on Days 1 and 8

"Pharmacokinetic parameters of albuterol were determined on Day 1 after the first dose administration and at steady-state on Day 8. Day 1 serial (10-hr) blood samples for pharmacokinetics pre-dose (within 30 minutes prior to dosing), and post-dose at the following times: 15 (±5) min, 30 (±5) min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours (±10 minutes). Day 8 serial (6-hr) blood samples for pharmacokinetics pre-dose (within 30 min prior to dosing), and post-dose at the following times: 15 (±5) min, 30 (±5) min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 hr (±10 min).~AUC0-t on Day 8 is not from pre-dose but at steady state." (NCT01747629)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 8

Interventionpg*hr/mL (Mean)
Day 1Day 8
Albuterol MDPI17472165

[back to top]

Physical Examination Findings Shifts From Baseline to Endpoint by Treatment Group

Physical exam was recorded as normal or abnormal based on physician assessment. Format for results is: Test Baseline/Endpoint. HEENT = head, eyes, ears, nose, throat. (NCT01747629)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 85

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
General appearance Normal/NormalGeneral appearance Normal/AbnormalGeneral appearance Abnormal/NormalGeneral appearance Abnormal/AbnormalHEENT Normal/NormalHEENT Normal/AbnormalHEENT Abnormal/NormalHEENT Abnormal/AbnormalChest and Lungs Normal/NormalChest and Lungs Normal/AbnormalChest and Lungs Abnormal/NormalChest and Lungs Abnormal/AbnormalHeart Normal/NormalHeart Normal/AbnormalHeart Abnormal/NormalHeart Abnormal/AbnormalAbdomen Normal/NormalAbdomen Normal/AbnormalAbdomen Abnormal/NormalAbdomen Abnormal/AbnormalMusculoskeletal Normal/NormalMusculoskeletal Normal/AbnormalMusculoskeletal Abnormal/NormalMusculoskeletal Abnormal/AbnormalSkin Normal/NormalSkin Normal/AbnormalSkin Abnormal/NormalSkin Abnormal/AbnormalLymph nodes Normal/NormalLymph nodes Normal/AbnormalLymph nodes Abnormal/NormalLymph nodes Abnormal/AbnormalNeurological Normal/NormalNeurological Normal/AbnormalNeurological Abnormal/NormalNeurological Abnormal/Abnormal
Albuterol MDPI7210152251564370701037110272101631467400074000
Placebo MDPI8100259171676232820018200181101695278300083000

[back to top]

Terminal Plasma Half-life (t1/2) for Albuterol on Days 1 and 8

Pharmacokinetic parameters of albuterol were determined on Day 1 after the first dose administration and at steady-state on Day 8. Day 1 serial (10-hr) blood samples for pharmacokinetics pre-dose (within 30 minutes prior to dosing), and post-dose at the following times: 15 (±5) min, 30 (±5) min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours (±10 minutes). Day 8 serial (6-hr) blood samples for pharmacokinetics pre-dose (within 30 min prior to dosing), and post-dose at the following times: 15 (±5) min, 30 (±5) min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 hr (±10 min). (NCT01747629)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 8

Interventionhour (Mean)
Day 1Day 8
Albuterol MDPI4.75.7

[back to top]

Time to Observed Peak Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Albuterol on Days 1 and 8

Pharmacokinetic parameters of albuterol were determined on Day 1 after the first dose administration and at steady-state on Day 8. Day 1 serial (10-hr) blood samples for pharmacokinetics pre-dose (within 30 minutes prior to dosing), and post-dose at the following times: 15 (±5) min, 30 (±5) min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours (±10 minutes). Day 8 serial (6-hr) blood samples for pharmacokinetics pre-dose (within 30 min prior to dosing), and post-dose at the following times: 15 (±5) min, 30 (±5) min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 hr (±10 min). (NCT01747629)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 8

Interventionhour (Median)
Day 1Day 8
Albuterol MDPI0.480.44

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 (Pre-dose) up to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6) for Albuterol on Days 1 and 8

"Pharmacokinetic parameters of albuterol were determined on Day 1 after the first dose administration and at steady-state on Day 8. Day 1 serial (10-hr) blood samples for pharmacokinetics pre-dose (within 30 minutes prior to dosing), and post-dose at the following times: 15 (±5) min, 30 (±5) min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours (±10 minutes). Day 8 serial (6-hr) blood samples for pharmacokinetics pre-dose (within 30 min prior to dosing), and post-dose at the following times: 15 (±5) min, 30 (±5) min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 hr (±10 min).~AUC0-6 on Day 8 is not from pre-dose but at steady state." (NCT01747629)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 8

Interventionpg*hr/mL (Mean)
Day 1Day 8
Albuterol MDPI13252163

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Salmeterol

Blood samples for measurement of plasma SAL concentrations were obtained during each treatment visit (subjects 18 years of age and older only) and pharmacokinetic parameters were derived. The primary pharmacokinetic parameters were AUC0-t and Cmax for Salmeterol. (NCT01772368)
Timeframe: Predose (0), and at 5, 10, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
FS MDPI 100/6.25 mcg16.0
FS MDPI 100/12.5mcg35.8
FS MDPI 100/25 mcg67.5
FS MDPI 100/50 mcg154.5
Advair Diskus 100/50 mcg42.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at 12 Hours Post-Dose in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) By Treatment

"The secondary efficacy variable was the change from period-specific baseline in FEV1 at 12 hours, calculated as FEV1 measured at 12 hours postdose after subtracting period-specific baseline FEV1 at each treatment period.~The period-specific baseline FEV1 was measured at predose within 5 minutes of AM dose administration at each treatment visit. If that value was missing, then FEV1 measured at 30 minutes predose was used as the period-specific baseline." (NCT01772368)
Timeframe: Pre-dose: 30 minutes prior, within 5 minutes of dose. Post-dose: 12 hours

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Fp MDPI 100 mcg11.53
FS MDPI 100/6.25 mcg128.49
FS MDPI 100/12.5mcg170.51
FS MDPI 100/25 mcg209.85
FS MDPI 100/50 mcg238.30
Advair Diskus 100/50 mcg170.54

[back to top]

Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period

"TEAEs were recorded during each double-blind treatment. In addition, at the end of each treatment, patients continued to use 2 inhalations of Fp MDPI 50 mcg (100 mcg total dose) twice daily, so adverse events during this treatment were assigned to Fp MDPI 50 mcg.~An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relationship of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical in" (NCT01772368)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 35

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any adverse eventSevere adverse eventTreatment-related adverse eventDeathsOther serious adverse eventsWithdrawn from treatment due to AE
Advair Diskus 100/50 mcg301000
Fp MDPI 100 mcg200000
Fp MDPI 50 mcg X 2 BID1711001
FS MDPI 100/12.5mcg301000
FS MDPI 100/25 mcg100000
FS MDPI 100/50 mcg110000
FS MDPI 100/6.25 mcg200000

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) of Salmeterol

Blood samples for measurement of plasma SAL concentrations were obtained during each treatment visit (subjects 18 years of age and older only) and pharmacokinetic parameters were derived. The primary pharmacokinetic parameters were AUC0-t and Cmax for Salmeterol. (NCT01772368)
Timeframe: Predose (0), and at 5, 10, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Interventionpg*hr/mL (Mean)
FS MDPI 100/6.25 mcg32.8
FS MDPI 100/12.5mcg69.9
FS MDPI 100/25 mcg133.5
FS MDPI 100/50 mcg309.3
Advair Diskus 100/50 mcg173.5

[back to top]

Time of Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Salmeterol

Blood samples for measurement of plasma SAL concentrations were obtained during each treatment visit (subjects 18 years of age and older only) and pharmacokinetic parameters were derived. (NCT01772368)
Timeframe: Predose (0), and at 5, 10, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Interventionhours (Median)
FS MDPI 100/6.25 mcg0.1
FS MDPI 100/12.5mcg0.1
FS MDPI 100/25 mcg0.1
FS MDPI 100/50 mcg0.1
Advair Diskus 100/50 mcg0.5

[back to top]

Standardized Baseline-Adjusted Area Under the Curve For Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second Over 12 Hours Post-dose (FEV1 AUC0-12)

Standardized baseline-adjusted FEV1 AUC0-12 was defined as the area under the curve for baseline-adjusted FEV1 measurements from the predose to 12 hours postdose time points using the trapezoidal rule based on actual (not scheduled) time of measurement and was standardized by dividing the actual time of last non-missing FEV1 measurement. Baseline-adjusted FEV1 was calculated as postdose FEV1 after subtracting period-specific baseline FEV1. The period-specific baseline FEV1 was measured at predose within 5 minutes of AM dose administration at each treatment visit. If that value was missing, then FEV1 measured at 30 minutes predose was used as the period-specific baseline. (NCT01772368)
Timeframe: Pre-dose: 30 minutes prior, within 5 minutes of dose. Post-dose: 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12 hours

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Fp MDPI 100 mcg52.13
FS MDPI 100/6.25 mcg203.84
FS MDPI 100/12.5mcg248.98
FS MDPI 100/25 mcg279.69
FS MDPI 100/50 mcg303.43
Advair Diskus 100/50 mcg245.56

[back to top]

Maximum Percentage Fall From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) up to 60 Minutes After the Exercise Challenge

"A centralized spirometry data collection system was used to reduce FEV1 variability between and within patients and between each participating study center.~The percentage fall was defined as 100*(baseline-post baseline)/baseline. The baseline FEV1 is the test day FEV1 measured 5 minutes before the exercise challenge (30 minutes postdose). FEV1 post exercise challenge were measured 5 (±5), 10 (±5), 15 (±5), 30 (±5), and 60 (±10) minutes after completion of the exercise challenge.~The exercise challenge consisted of the participant running on a motor-driven treadmill (with adjustable speed and incline). The treadmill was set at a speed and incline sufficient to increase the participant's heart rate to ≥80% of the maximum rate for age (220 bpm-age in years) for a period of either 6, 7, or 8 minutes using a stepped-exercise protocol in accordance with ATS guidelines (American Thoracic Society 2000). Conditions were repeated for subsequent challenges." (NCT01791972)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 7; up to 60 minutes post-exercise challenge

Interventionpercentage change from baseline FEV1 (Mean)
Albuterol Spiromax 180 mcg6.21
Placebo Spiromax22.38

[back to top]

Participants Whose Maximum Percentage Decrease From the Baseline Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Post-Exercise Challenge Was >20%

Participants were classified as unprotected if the maximum percentage decrease from baseline FEV1 after exercise was more than 20%. Data represents the number of participants who were classified as unprotected. (NCT01791972)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 7; up to 60 minutes post-exercise challenge

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Albuterol Spiromax 180 mcg1
Placebo Spiromax22

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Whose Maximum Percentage Decrease From the Baseline Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Post-Exercise Challenge Was <10%

Participants were classified as protected if the maximum percentage decrease from baseline FEV1 after exercise was less than 10%. Data represents the percentage of participants who were classified as protected. (NCT01791972)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 7; up to 60 minutes post-exercise challenge

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Albuterol Spiromax 180 mcg84.21
Placebo Spiromax15.79

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Accurate Classification of Irreversible Airflow Obstruction

accuracy of diagnosis was the outcome measure. The results of the spirometry test (done in the beginning for the intervention group and ant the end of 1 year for the usual care groups) were reviewed in conjunction with the initial physician diagnosis of COPD and/or asthma to confirm whether the diagnosis was accurate, not accurate, or indeterminate. Accuracy of diagnosis of COPD was determined by spirometry results if the FEV1/FVC ratio was <0.7. (NCT01833026)
Timeframe: spirometry was performed at the first visit for intervention group and at 1 year from recruitment for the usual care group, one time assessment for both groups

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
COPD Assessment and Management Recommendations10
Usual Care5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT Population

Participants might administered salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol as reliever medication as needed during the study. The number of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol inhalations were recorded by the participants in their electronic diary. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventioninhalations per day (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Change from baseline at Week 12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w2.982.03-0.99
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w3.011.99-0.92
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w3.252.30-0.95
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w3.362.09-1.35
Placebo q2w2.722.20-0.44

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population

Participants might administered salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol as reliever medication as needed during the study. The number of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol inhalations were recorded by the participants in their electronic diary. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventioninhalations per day (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Change from baseline at Week 12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w3.022.15-0.93
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w2.421.36-1.01
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w3.612.14-1.47
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w3.151.85-1.49
Placebo q2w2.531.88-0.51

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT Population

Morning asthma symptom score was determined using AM symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the night. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0 = No asthma symptoms, slept through the night, 1= Slept well, but some complaints in the morning, no night-time awakenings, 2= Woke up once because of asthma (including early awakening), 3= Woke up several times because of asthma (including early awakening), 4= Bad night, awake most of the night because of asthma. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Change from baseline at Week 12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w1.240.79-0.46
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w1.290.72-0.54
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w1.250.82-0.43
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w1.330.80-0.52
Placebo q2w1.170.90-0.23

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population

Morning asthma symptom score was determined using AM (ante meridiem) symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the night. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0 = No asthma symptoms, slept through the night, 1= Slept well, but some complaints in the morning, no night-time awakenings, 2= Woke up once because of asthma (including early awakening), 3= Woke up several times because of asthma (including early awakening), 4= Bad night, awake most of the night because of asthma. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Change from baseline at Week 12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w1.220.70-0.55
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w1.180.63-0.57
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w1.450.78-0.66
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w1.310.70-0.57
Placebo q2w1.150.83-0.29

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/L

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionliter (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Change from baseline at Week 12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w1.792.020.23
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w1.942.060.17
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w1.92.120.19
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w1.852.050.16
Placebo q2w1.791.920.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population

Evening asthma symptom score was determined using PM (post meridiem) symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the day. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0=very well, no asthma symptoms, 1=one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness, 2=more than one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness without interference of normal activities, 3=wheezing, cough, or breathlessness most of the day, which interfered to some extent with normal activities, 4=asthma very bad, unable to carry out daily activities as usual. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Change from baseline at Week 12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w1.460.89-0.62
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w1.390.69-0.69
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w1.720.88-0.84
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w1.520.76-0.73
Placebo q2w1.330.95-0.35

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT Population

Evening asthma symptom score was determined using PM symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the day. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0=very well, no asthma symptoms, 1=one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness, 2=more than one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness without interference of normal activities, 3=wheezing, cough, or breathlessness most of the day, which interfered to some extent with normal activities, 4=asthma very bad, unable to carry out daily activities as usual. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Change from baseline at Week 12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w1.420.95-0.52
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w1.470.89-0.54
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w1.470.95-0.52
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w1.500.89-0.59
Placebo q2w1.321.02-0.27

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population

The ACQ-5 has 5 questions, reflecting the top-scoring five asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze. Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to each of the five symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). ACQ-5 total score was mean of the scores of all 5 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Change from baseline at Week 12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w2.651.20-1.40
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w2.761.39-1.38
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w2.981.20-1.72
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w2.691.27-1.39
Placebo q2w2.551.52-1.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT Population

The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to participants with asthma. The AQLQ comprises of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire are averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Change from baseline at Week 12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w4.035.221.19
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w4.005.030.98
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w3.915.131.25
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w4.025.041.03
Placebo q2w4.125.000.86

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT Population

The ACQ-5 has 5 questions, reflecting the top-scoring five asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze. Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to each of the five symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). ACQ-5 total score was mean of the scores of all 5 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Change from baseline at Week 12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w2.731.38-1.35
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w2.781.49-1.24
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w2.801.41-1.38
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w2.701.38-1.32
Placebo q2w2.691.55-1.11

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionliter (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Change from baseline at Week 12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w1.82.260.45
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w1.82.090.26
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w1.772.120.36
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w1.872.260.35
Placebo q2w1.862.130.18

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionliter (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Change from baseline at Week 12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w1.792.120.32
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w1.882.070.20
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w1.852.120.26
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w1.862.140.24
Placebo q2w1.822.010.13

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Placebo q2w7.04
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w16.64
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w19.15
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w13.55
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w13.04

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Placebo q2w10.07
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w25.29
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w27.42
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w20.68
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w18.07

[back to top]

Annualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: ITT Population

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for >=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionexacerbation per participant-year (Number)
Placebo q2w0.897
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.265
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.269
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w0.599
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w0.415

[back to top]

Annualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT Population

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for >=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionexacerbation per participant-year (Number)
Placebo q2w1.044
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.201
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.30
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w0.678
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w0.358

[back to top]

Annualized Event Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT Population

LOAC was defined as any of the following: >=6 additional reliever puffs of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol in a 24-hour period (compared to baseline) on 2 consecutive days; increase in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) >=4 times the dose at randomization; use of systemic corticosteroids for >=3 days; hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of LOAC that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

InterventionLOAC per participant-year (Number)
Placebo q2w1.312
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.322
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.446
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w0.788
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w0.424

[back to top]

Annualized Event Rate of LOAC During The Treatment Period: ITT Population

LOAC was defined as any of the following: >=6 additional reliever puffs of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol in a 24-hour period (compared to baseline) on 2 consecutive days; increase in ICS >=4 times the dose at randomization; use of systemic corticosteroids for >=3 days; hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of LOAC that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

InterventionLOAC per participant-year (Number)
Placebo q2w1.107
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.326
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.347
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w0.73
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w0.563

[back to top]

Time to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: ITT Population

The time to first severe exacerbation was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first severe exacerbation event. For participants who had no severe exacerbation on or before last dose date + 14 days, it was censored at the date of last dose date + 14 days. The median time to first severe exacerbation was not estimated because the number of severe exacerbations was too low in the Dupilumab arms. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of severe exacerbation at Week 12 and 24, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

,,,,
Interventionprobability of Severe Exacerbation (Number)
Probability at Week 12Probability at Week 24
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.070.091
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w0.0750.16
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.0920.112
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w0.1120.195
Placebo q2w0.2070.266

[back to top]

Time to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: HEos-ITT Population

The time to first severe exacerbation was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first severe exacerbation event. For participants who had no severe exacerbation on or before last dose date + 14 days, it was censored at the date of last dose date + 14 days. The median time to first severe exacerbation was not estimated because the number of severe exacerbations was too low in the Dupilumab arms. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of severe exacerbation at Week 12 and 24, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

,,,,
Interventionprobability of Severe Exacerbation (Number)
Probability at Week 12Probability at Week 24
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.0820.082
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w0.0520.125
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.0820.116
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w0.0940.175
Placebo q2w0.210.287

[back to top]

Time to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: ITT Population

The time to first LOAC event was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first LOAC event. For participants who had no LOAC event on or before last dose date + 14 days, it was censored at the date of last dose date + 14 days. The median time to first LOAC was not estimated because the number of LOAC was too low in the Dupilumab arms. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of LOAC at Week 12 and 24, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

,,,,
Interventionprobability of LOAC (Number)
Probability at Week 12Probability at Week 24
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.090.112
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w0.0960.209
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.1120.146
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w0.1450.242
Placebo q2w0.2580.338

[back to top]

Time to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: HEos-ITT Population

The time to first LOAC event was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first LOAC event. For participants who had no LOAC event on or before last dose date + 14 days, it was censored at the date of last dose date + 14 days. The median time to first LOAC was not estimated because the number of LOAC was too low in the Dupilumab arms. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of LOAC at Week 12 and 24, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

,,,,
Interventionprobability of LOAC (Number)
Probability at Week 12Probability at Week 24
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.1130.113
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w0.0520.162
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.1150.166
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w0.1260.207
Placebo q2w0.300.392

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population

The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to participants with asthma. The AQLQ comprises of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire are averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life. (NCT01854047)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Change from baseline at Week 12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w4.025.411.42
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w3.895.051.16
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w3.825.351.54
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w3.995.061.08
Placebo q2w4.165.050.80

[back to top]

Absolute Value of Total Discrepancy Size Per Inhaler

"The purpose of the study is to determine if the dose counter on Albuterol Spiromax is counting accurately; accuracy is determined by concordance/agreement between patient-reported Albuterol Spiromax counter readings and patient-reported dose cycles recorded in patient diaries. This outcome is calculated for each inhaler as beginning counter reading minus end counter reading minus patient-recorded number of dose cycles. The total inhaler discrepancy size is an important measure because it provides the most relevant means of ensuring that the inhaler does not exhaust its supply of albuterol before the counter has recorded the labeled 200 doses." (NCT01857323)
Timeframe: Day 1 - Day 50

Interventiondiscrepancies/inhaler (Mean)
Albuterol Spiromax®2.0

[back to top]

Dosing Discrepancies Per 200 Dose Cycles: Count Up Unknown Dose Cycle

"The purpose of the study is to determine if the dose counter on Albuterol Spiromax is counting accurately; accuracy is determined by concordance/agreement between patient-reported Albuterol Spiromax counter readings and patient-reported dose cycles recorded in patient diaries. This outcome measures when the inhaler counter counts upwards (number increases, e.g. 50 to 52) rather than downward between dosing sessions but the participant has not knowingly executed the dose cycle (i.e., the counter number at the beginning of the dosing session is greater than the counter number at the end of the previous dosing session). The discrepancy rate was calculated as number of discrepancies/total number of dose cycles *200." (NCT01857323)
Timeframe: Day 1 - Day 50

Interventiondiscrepancies/200 dose cycles (Number)
Albuterol Spiromax®0.17

[back to top]

Dosing Discrepancies Per 200 Dose Cycles: Dose Cycle Count Up

"The purpose of the study is to determine if the dose counter on Albuterol Spiromax is counting accurately; accuracy is determined by concordance/agreement between patient-reported Albuterol Spiromax counter readings and patient-reported dose cycles recorded in patient diaries. This outcome measures when the inhaler counter reading increases, instead of decreases, after the participant has executed the dose cycle (i.e., the ending counter reading is greater than the beginning counter reading within a dosing session). The discrepancy rate was calculated as number of discrepancies/total number of dose cycles *200." (NCT01857323)
Timeframe: Day 1 - Day 50

Interventiondiscrepancies/200 dose cycles (Number)
Albuterol Spiromax®2.46

[back to top]

Dosing Discrepancies Per 200 Dose Cycles: Dose Cycle Not Count

"The purpose of the study is to determine if the dose counter on Albuterol Spiromax is counting accurately; accuracy is determined by concordance/agreement between patient-reported Albuterol Spiromax counter readings and patient-reported dose cycles recorded in patient diaries. This outcome measures how often the dose cycle was not counted: the participant completes a full dose cycle (opens the mouthpiece cap, inhales the medication, and closes the mouthpiece cap) but the counter display does not advance (i.e., does not count down) within a dosing session. The discrepancy rate was calculated as number of discrepancies/total number of dose cycles *200." (NCT01857323)
Timeframe: Day 1 - Day 50

Interventiondiscrepancies/200 dose cycles (Number)
Albuterol Spiromax®2.05

[back to top]

Dosing Discrepancies Per 200 Dose Cycles: Count Unknown Dose Cycle

"The purpose of the study is to determine if the dose counter on Albuterol Spiromax is counting accurately; accuracy is determined by concordance/agreement between patient-reported Albuterol Spiromax counter readings and patient-reported dose cycles recorded in patient diaries. This outcome measures when the inhaler counter advances (decreases, e.g., 50 to 48) between dosing sessions but the participant has not knowingly executed the dose cycle (i.e., the counter number at the beginning of the dosing session is less than the counter number at the end of the previous dosing session). The discrepancy rate was calculated as number of discrepancies/total number of dose cycles *200." (NCT01857323)
Timeframe: Day 1 - Day 50

Interventiondiscrepancies/200 dose cycles (Number)
Albuterol Spiromax®0.43

[back to top]

Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

Adverse events (AEs) summarized in this table are those that began or worsened after treatment with study drug (treatment-emergent AEs). An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. (NCT01857323)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 50

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventSevere adverse eventTreatment-related adverse eventDeathsOther serious adverse eventsWithdrawn from study due to adverse event
Albuterol Spiromax®8527021

[back to top]

Diffusion Capacity of the Lungs for Nitric Oxide

Using the rebreathe technique the diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide and nitric oxide were measured, and this allowed for the determination of alveolar-capillary membrane conductance and pulmonary capillary blood volume. These measurements were made at baseline and 30-, 60- and 90-minutes post albuterol administration in cystic fibrosis and healthy subjects. (NCT01880723)
Timeframe: baseline, 30-, 60- and 90-minutes post albuterol administration

,
InterventionmL/min/mmHg (Mean)
Baseline30 minutes post60 minutes post90 minutes post
Cystic Fibrosis55.056.456.258.5
Healthy70.370.872.173.0

[back to top]

Exhaled Sodium (mmol/L)

We collected exhaled breath condensate (EBC) samples, with subjects breathing on a Jaeger EcoScreen for 20 minutes. EBC samples were collected in cystic fibrosis and healthy subjects before and 30-, 60-, and 90-minutes following albuterol administration. (NCT01880723)
Timeframe: up to 90-minutes post albuterol

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Baseline30 minutes post60 minutes post90 minutes post
Cystic Fibrosis2.242.111.731.86
Healthy2.581.972.372.23

[back to top]

Net Exhaled Chloride

"The calculation of net chloride efflux was used to account for the paracellular reabsorption of Cl- that will follow the reabsorption of Na+ to maintain electroneutral ion flux. Thus, the net chloride efflux calculation used was the gross chloride concentration plus the absolute value of the percent change in sodium from baseline multiplied by the gross chloride concentration for each time point:~Net Cl- efflux - [Cl- X-min post] + (([Na+ X-min post]-[Na+Baseline])/ [Na+Baseline]) x [Cl- X-min post])" (NCT01880723)
Timeframe: baseline to 90 minutes post albuterol administration

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Baseline30 minutes post60 minutes post90 minutes post
Cystic Fibrosis0.0370.0480.0570.050
Healthy0.0640.0780.0840.077

[back to top]

Peripheral Oxygen Saturation

A finger pulse oximeter allowed for the measurement of peripheral oxygen saturation at baseline, 30-, 60- and 90-minutes post albuterol in cystic fibrosis and healthy subjects. (NCT01880723)
Timeframe: baseline, 30-, 60- and 90-minutes post albuterol

,
Interventionpercent of oxygenated hemoglobin (Mean)
Baseline30 minutes post60 minutes post90 minutes post
Cystic Fibrosis98989899
Healthy991009999

[back to top]

Diffusion Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide

Using the rebreathe technique the diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide and nitric oxide were measured, and this allowed for the determination of alveolar-capillary membrane conductance and pulmonary capillary blood volume. These measurements were made at baseline and 30-, 60- and 90-minutes post albuterol administration in cystic fibrosis and healthy subjects. (NCT01880723)
Timeframe: baseline, 30-, 60- and 90-minutes post albuterol administration

,
InterventionmL/min/mmHg (Mean)
Baseline30 minutes post60 minutes post90 minutes post
Cystic Fibrosis17.317.417.017.1
Healthy21.521.621.621.2

[back to top]

Change in Forced Vital Capacity From Pulmonary Function Tests at 30 Weeks and 52 Weeks.

FVC (forced vital capacity) is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. (NCT01885936)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 30, and Week 52

,
InterventionPercent of predicted FVC (Mean)
Change at 30 WeeksChange at 52 Weeks
Albuterol-0.2-1.3
Placebo Comparator0.43.0

[back to top]

Change in 6 Minute Walk Test

The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity. Assessed by physical therapist. (NCT01885936)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 52

,
Interventionmeters (Mean)
Change at 6 WeeksChange at 52 Weeks
Albuterol24.043.6
Placebo Comparator32.013.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events.

All participants who experienced adverse events. (NCT01885936)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Albuterol5
Placebo Comparator5

[back to top]

Baseline-Adjusted Area-Under-The-Percent-Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) Versus Time Curve Over 6 Hours Post-Dose

"Percent predicted FEV1: measured FEV1 as a percent of the predicted values for the patients of similar characteristics. Predicted FEV1 values were computed and adjusted for age, height, and gender for patients aged 4-5 years (Eigen et al 2001) and for patients aged 6-11 years (Quanjer et al 1995) using ATS/European Thoracic Society (ERS) criteria applicable to pediatric patients (ATS/ERS 2007).~The percent predicted FEV1 (PPFEV1) area under the curve (AUC)0-6 was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule, and baseline adjustment was made by subtracting the average of the 2 pre-dose PPFEV1 values from each post-dose PPFEV1 determination." (NCT01899144)
Timeframe: Treatment visits 1-5 (approximately days 1, 6, 11, 16, and 21); -35 and -5 minutes prior to dosing and 5 (±2), 15 (±5), 30 (±5), 45 (±5), 60 (±5), 120 (±5), 180 (±5), 240 (±5), 300 (±5), and 360 (±5) minutes after the completion of study drug administrati

Intervention%predicted FEV1*hour (Mean)
Albuterol Spiromax 90 mcg46.6
Albuterol Spiromax 180 mcg48.0
ProAir HFA 90 mcg37.9
ProAir HFA 180 mcg49.1
Placebo25.4

[back to top]

Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

"Adverse events (AEs) summarized in this table are those that began or worsened after treatment with study drug (treatment-emergent AEs). An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator as mild (no limitation of usual activities), moderate, or severe (inability to carry out usual activities).~Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes." (NCT01899144)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 35

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment-related AESevere TEAERelated TEAEDeathSerious AETEAE leading to withdrawal
Albuterol Spiromax 180 mcg200000
Albuterol Spiromax 90 mcg000000
Placebo100000
ProAir HFA 180 mcg100000
ProAir HFA 90 mcg500000

[back to top]

Baseline-Adjusted Area-Under-The- Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) Versus Time Curve Over 6 Hours Post-Dose (FEV1 AUC0-6)

FEV1 AUC0-6 was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule, and baseline adjustment was made by subtracting the average of the 2 pre-dose FEV1 values from each post-dose FEV1 determination. (NCT01899144)
Timeframe: Treatment visits 1-5 (approximately days 1, 6, 11, 16, and 21); -35 and -5 minutes prior to dosing and 5 (±2), 15 (±5), 30 (±5), 45 (±5), 60 (±5), 120 (±5), 180 (±5), 240 (±5), 300 (±5), and 360 (±5) minutes after the completion of study drug administrati

InterventionL*hour (Mean)
Albuterol Spiromax 90 mcg0.88
Albuterol Spiromax 180 mcg0.93
ProAir HFA 90 mcg0.74
ProAir HFA 180 mcg0.93
Placebo0.48

[back to top]

Total Airway Resistance Increase

concentration of methacholine required to increase total airway resistance by 40% (PC40R5) (NCT01907334)
Timeframe: 1 to 7 days

Interventionln(mg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Advair and Advair DiskusesAdvair and Flovent Diskuses
Increase in Airway Resistance After Methacholine4722.9

[back to top]

Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) 15 Min Post Dose

Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) is the amount of air that can be exhaled in one second. FEV1 will be measured by spirometry. All spirometry calibrations and evaluations will follow the recommendations of the American Thoracic Society / European Respiratory Society guidelines for acceptability. (NCT01922271)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionliters per hour (Mean)
NVA2371.433
Tiotropium1.398

[back to top]

Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve (AUC) 0-2

Standardized Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) AUC0-2h will be measured via spirometry. The AUC will be calculated from the FEV1 measurements obtained at timepoints between 0 min and 2h using the trapezoidal rule and will be standardized (=divided) by the measurement time (i.e. 2h). (NCT01922271)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionliters per hour (Mean)
NVA2371.490
Tiotropium1.453

[back to top]

Total Lung Capacity (TLC)

Total Lung Capacity (TLC) is the best vital capacity plus residual volume (RV). Whole body plethysmography (Bodybox) will be used to measure TLC. (NCT01922271)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
-45 min (n=152, 150)30 min (n=150, 151)1hr (n=151, 149)1hr 30 min (n=151, 149)2hr 30 min (n=150, 149)3hr 30 min (n=150, 148)
NVA2377.3807.2557.2247.2277.2037.240
Tiotropium7.3357.2747.1617.1657.1497.149

[back to top]

Functional Resistance Capacity (FRCpleth)

Functional Resistance Capacity (FRCpleth) will be measured using whole body plethysmography (Bodybox). (NCT01922271)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
-45 min (n=152, 150)30 min (n=150, 151)1 hr (n=151, 149)1 hr 30 min (n=151, 149)2 h 30 min (n= 150, 149)3 h 30 min (n= 150, 148)
NVA2375.2114.8234.7694.7564.7364.761
Tiotropium5.1424.8524.7254.7144.6764.704

[back to top]

Residual Volume (RV)

Residual Volume (RV) will be measured using whole body plethysmography (Bodybox). (NCT01922271)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
-45 min (n=152, 150)30 min (n=150, 151)1 hr (n=151, 149)1 hr 30 min (n=151, 149)2 h 30 min (n= 150, 149)3 h 30 min (n= 150, 148)
NVA2374.4333.9963.8913.9103.8933.970
Tiotropium4.3444.0353.9133.9033.8613.895

[back to top]

Specific Airway Resistance (sRAW)

Specific Airway Resistance (sRAW) indicates volume and resistance-dependent work of breathing needed in order to generate a reference flow rate of 1 L/s, measured by kPa*s. Whole body plethysmography (Bodybox) is used to measure SRaw. (NCT01922271)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
Interventionkilopascal (kPa) (Mean)
-45 min (n=152, 150)30 min (n=150, 151)1 hr (n=151, 149)1 hr 30 min (n=151, 150)2 hr 30 min (n=150, 149)3 hr 30 min (n=150, 149)
NVA2374.2032.9042.6562.6322.6432.779
Tiotropium4.1053.0892.8772.8112.7562.828

[back to top]

Inspiratory Capacity (IC)

Inspiratory Capacity (IC) is the volume of air breathed in by a maximum inspiration at the end of a normal expiration. Whole body plethysmography (Bodybox) will be used to measure IC. (NCT01922271)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
-45 min (n=152, 150)30 min (n=150, 151)1hr (n=151, 149)1hr 30 min (n=151, 150)2hr 30 min (n=150, 149)3hr 30 min (n=150, 149)
NVA2372.1692.4332.4552.4722.4672.479
Tiotropium2.1932.4222.4352.4572.4742.449

[back to top]

Change in Respiratory Function (Airway Resistance at 5 Hz) From Baseline

The percentage change in respiratory function from baseline is measured in percentage change in Resistance, kPa/(L/s). (NCT01987219)
Timeframe: Pre and 30 minutes post study drug administration

Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
Albuterol-sulphate-22.7
Ipratropium-bromide (Atrovent ®)-19.5
Placebo-1.1

[back to top]

Change in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV) From Baseline

Forced expiratory volume is measured in liters of air per second. FEV was measured during the first second of exhalation. (NCT01987219)
Timeframe: Pre and 30 post study drug admistration

Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
Albuterol-sulphate7.69
Ipratropium-bromide (Atrovent ®)4.81
Placebo-0.9

[back to top]

Change in Forced Expiratory Flow Between 25-75% (FEF25-75)

FEF25-75 is measured in liters of air per second at 25-75% (NCT01987219)
Timeframe: pre and 30 minutes post intervention

Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
Albuterol-sulphate14.7
Ipratropium-bromide (Atrovent ®)11.5
Placebo-2.99

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Forced Vital Capacity

FVC is a measure of the amount of air exhaled, and is measured in liters of air per second. The percentage in the change in the amount of air exhaled from baseline, measured in liters of air per second. Increase in the percentage of air exhaled from baseline indicates improvement in respiratory function. (NCT01987219)
Timeframe: Pre and 30 minutes post study drug administration

Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
Albuterol-sulphate5.5
Ipratropium-bromide (Atrovent ®)4.7
Placebo0.9

[back to top]

The Primary Outcome Will be the Score on the Juniper Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)

"An ACQ score of > 1.5 means asthma is not well controlled. An ACQ score of <= 1.5 means asthma is well controlled.~Missing ACQ score = number of participants not administered an ACQ" (NCT01997463)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Visit 172274796Visit 172274797Visit 272274796Visit 272274797Visit 372274796Visit 372274797Visit 472274796Visit 472274797
missing ACQ scoreACQ score <=1.5(well controlled)ACQ score >1.5 (not well controlled)
Regular Therapy54
Supervised Therapy70
Regular Therapy74
Supervised Therapy95
Regular Therapy64
Supervised Therapy85
Regular Therapy56
Supervised Therapy73
Regular Therapy75
Supervised Therapy99
Regular Therapy61
Supervised Therapy78
Regular Therapy55
Supervised Therapy65
Supervised Therapy116
Regular Therapy62
Supervised Therapy69
Regular Therapy60
Regular Therapy77
Supervised Therapy123
Supervised Therapy62

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12-week Treatment Period Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)

"A hand-held peak flow meter was provided to patients at the screening visit and used to determine the morning and evening PEF throughout the course of the study. The patient recorded the highest value of 3 measurements obtained in the morning and evening in the patient diary.~Baseline in evening PEF is defined as the average of recorded evening PEF assessments over the 7-day window before randomization.~Weekly average PEF data was generated using 7-day windows based on analysis days (after the first dose of double-blind study treatment). PEF over the 12 week treatment period was performed using a mixed-model for repeated measures (MMRM) with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily evening peak PEF, sex, age, treatment, time, and time by treatment interaction." (NCT02031640)
Timeframe: Baseline: Days -7 to Day -1, Treatment: Day 1 to Week 12

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BAI and MDI-4.708
BDP 320 mcg BAI4.439
BDP 640 mcg BAI4.462
BDP 320 mcg MDI-0.62
BDP 640 mcg MDI5.594

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over Weeks 1-12 Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)

Asthma symptom scores are recorded in the patient's diary each morning and each evening before determining PEF and before administration of study or rescue medications. The Daytime Symptom Score (determined in the evening) has a range from 0=No symptoms during the day to 5=Symptoms so severe that I could not go to work or perform normal daily activities. The Nighttime Symptom Score (determined in the morning) has a range from 0=No symptoms during the night to 4=Symptoms so severe that I did not sleep at all. The total daily asthma symptom score is the average of the daytime and the nighttime scores (full scale is 0 - 4.5). The total daily asthma symptom score is missing if either the daytime or nighttime score is missing. Baseline was the average of recorded daily asthma symptom scores over 7 days prior to the first dose of study treatment. The weekly average was the sum of total daily asthma symptom scores over the 7 days divided by the number of non-missing assessments. (NCT02031640)
Timeframe: Days -6 to Day 1 (pre-randomization), Treatment: Day 1 to Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BAI and MDI-0.058
BDP 320 mcg BAI-0.207
BDP 640 mcg BAI-0.159
BDP 320 mcg MDI-0.247
BDP 640 mcg MDI-0.274

[back to top]

Standardized Baseline-adjusted Trough Morning Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time 0 to 12 Weeks (AUEC(0-12wk) )

"Trough morning FEV1 measurements were taken pre-dose and pre-rescue bronchodilator treatment for asthma. The baseline pulmonary function measurement was defined as the measurement obtained at randomization visit (Day 1). Pulmonary function measurements (including FEV1) were obtained electronically by spirometry. All pulmonary function test data were submitted to a central reading center for evaluation. The highest FEV1 value from 3 acceptable and 2 repeatable maneuvers (maximum of 5 attempts) was used.~Baseline-adjusted FEV1 AUEC(0-12wk) were calculated using the trapezoidal rule.~The standardized baseline-adjusted FEV1 AUEC(0-12 wk) accommodates participants who dropped out of the study. Baseline-adjusted FEV1 AUEC(0-t weeks)/t, where t =12 weeks for patients who complete the FEV1 assessment at Week 12. For participants who dropped out early, t <12 weeks (2, 4, or 8 weeks)." (NCT02031640)
Timeframe: Day 1 (baseline), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BAI and MDI0.056
BDP 320 mcg BAI0.09
BDP 640 mcg BAI0.101
BDP 320 mcg MDI0.041
BDP 640 mcg MDI0.096

[back to top]

Number of Participants Withdrawn From Study Due to Meeting Stopping Criteria for Worsening Asthma During the 12-Week Treatment Period

"A count of participants who were withdrawn from the study due to meeting stopping criteria. Alert criteria for individual patients with worsening asthma were designed to ensure patient safety. The investigator determined whether the patient's overall clinical picture is consistent with worsening asthma and if the patient should be withdrawn from study drug treatment (but not the study) and be placed on appropriate asthma therapy in the interest of patient safety.~An example of alert criteria is:~FEV1 as measured at the study center is below the FEV1 stability limit value calculated at randomization visit (Day 1).~Other criteria as defined in the protocol." (NCT02031640)
Timeframe: Treatment period: Day 1 up to Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo BAI or MDI15
BDP 320 mcg BAI3
BDP 640 mcg BAI3
BDP 320 mcg MDI5
BDP 640 mcg MDI1

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Withdrawal From Study Treatment Due to Meeting Stopping Criteria for Worsening Asthma

"Time to withdrawal due to meeting stopping criteria is defined as number of days elapsed from the date of the first dose of double-blind study treatment to the date of withdrawal due to meeting stopping criteria. Stopping criteria are:~FEV1 as measured at the study center is below the FEV1 stability limit value calculated at RV.~Based upon review of patient diary data, the patient has experienced any of the following during any 7-day period:~4+ days in which the highest (of 3 efforts) am PEF fall below the PEF stability limit calculated when randomized. The patient meets with the investigator who determines whether the FEV1 is consistent with worsening asthma;~3+ days in which 12+ inhalations/day of rescue medication were used~2+ days in which the patient experienced a nighttime asthma symptom score of more than 2~Clinical asthma exacerbation requiring (for example) the use of systemic corticosteroids, or the emergency room or hospitalization." (NCT02031640)
Timeframe: Day 1 - Week 12

Interventiondays (Median)
Placebo BAI or MDINA
BDP 320 mcg BAINA
BDP 640 mcg BAINA
BDP 320 mcg MDINA
BDP 640 mcg MDINA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Trough Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12-week Treatment Period Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)

"A hand-held peak flow meter was provided to patients at the screening visit and used to determine the morning and evening PEF throughout the course of the study. Daily trough morning PEF assessments were taken pre-dose and pre-rescue bronchodilator over the 12-week treatment period. The patient recorded the highest value of 3 measurements obtained in the morning and evening in the patient diary.~Baseline in trough morning PEF is defined as the average of recorded trough morning PEF assessments over the 7-day window before randomization, including the morning assessment on Day 1 before randomization.~Weekly average PEF data was generated using 7-day windows based on analysis days (before the first dose of double-blind study treatment). PEF over the 12 week treatment period was performed using a mixed-model for repeated measures (MMRM) with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily trough morning PEF, sex, age, treatment, time, and time by treatment interaction." (NCT02031640)
Timeframe: Baseline: Days -6 to Day 1 (pre-randomization), Treatment: Day 2 to Week 12

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BAI and MDI-5.524
BDP 320 mcg BAI5.092
BDP 640 mcg BAI2.895
BDP 320 mcg MDI0.480
BDP 640 mcg MDI6.988

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol (Number of Inhalations) Over Weeks 1-12 Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)

"Change from baseline in the use of rescue medication, albuterol/salbutamol, during the treatment period offers an indication of asthma control. Baseline was defined as the average of recorded daily usage of albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol over the 7 days prior to the first dose of double-blind study treatment, including the morning usage at the randomization visit.~Weekly average rescue medication data was generated using 7-day windows based on analysis days (after the first dose of double-blind study treatment). Weekly average over the 12 week treatment period was performed using a mixed-model for repeated measures (MMRM) with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, time, treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction." (NCT02031640)
Timeframe: Baseline: Days -6 to Day 1 (pre-randomization), Treatment: Day 1 to Week 12

Interventionnumber of inhalations (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BAI and MDI0.478
BDP 320 mcg BAI-0.226
BDP 640 mcg BAI-0.213
BDP 320 mcg MDI-0.173
BDP 640 mcg MDI-0.323

[back to top]

Standardized Baseline-adjusted Trough Morning Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time 0 to 12 Weeks (AUEC(0-12wk))

Trough morning FEV1 measurements were taken pre-dose and pre-rescue bronchodilator treatment for asthma. Baseline was defined as baseline trough morning percent predicted FEV1. Pulmonary function measurements (including FEV1) were obtained electronically by spirometry. All pulmonary function test data were submitted to a central reading center for evaluation. The highest ('best attempt') FEV1 value from 3 acceptable and 2 repeatable maneuvers (maximum of 8 attempts) was used. (NCT02040766)
Timeframe: Day 1 (baseline), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BAI and MDI2.62
BDP 80 mcg BAI5.43
BDP 160 mcg BAI3.25
BDP 80 mcg MDI3.54
BDP 160 mcg MDI3.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Trough Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12-week Treatment Period

The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily trough morning (pre-dose and pre-rescue bronchodilator) PEF calculated across the 12-week treatment period was performed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily trough morning PEF. (NCT02040766)
Timeframe: Day 1 (baseline), weeks 1-12

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BAI and MDI4.3
BDP 80 mcg BAI15.6
BDP 160 mcg BAI12.8
BDP 80 mcg MDI11.9
BDP 160 mcg MDI10.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12-week Treatment Period

The analysis of change from baseline in the weekly average of daily evening PEF across the 12-week treatment period was performed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily evening PEF. (NCT02040766)
Timeframe: Day 1 (baseline), weeks 1-12

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BAI and MDI1.4
BDP 80 mcg BAI13.1
BDP 160 mcg BAI11.4
BDP 80 mcg MDI11.3
BDP 160 mcg MDI10.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol (Number of Inhalations) Over Weeks 1-12

The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) across the 12 weeks was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). (NCT02040766)
Timeframe: Day 1 (baseline), weeks 1-12

InterventionNumber of inhalations (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BAI and MDI-0.36
BDP 80 mcg BAI-0.72
BDP 160 mcg BAI-0.50
BDP 80 mcg MDI-0.41
BDP 160 mcg MDI-0.54

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over Weeks 1-12

The total daily asthma symptom score is the average of the daytime and nighttime scores analyzed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). Baseline was defined as the average of recorded morning and evening asthma symptom scores over the 7 days before randomization. Daytime Scores range from 0=No symptoms during the day to 5=Symptoms so severe that I could not go to work or perform normal daily activities; Nighttime Scores range from 0=No symptoms during the night to 4=Symptoms so severe that I did not sleep at all. The daily asthma symptom score was therefore 0 - 9 with 0=no symptoms during the day or night and 9=severe symptoms both day and night. (NCT02040766)
Timeframe: Day 1 (baseline), weeks 1-12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BAI and MDI-0.27
BDP 80 mcg BAI-0.44
BDP 160 mcg BAI-0.36
BDP 80 mcg MDI-0.31
BDP 160 mcg MDI-0.36

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates For Time to Withdrawal Due to Meeting Stopping Criteria for Worsening Asthma During the 12-week Treatment Period

"Time to withdrawal due to meeting stopping criteria was defined as number of days elapsed from the date of first dose of double-blind study treatment to the date of withdrawal due to meeting stopping criteria.~Kaplan-Meier estimates (median and 95% CI of the median) are not applicable if the proportion of participants withdrawn is less than 0.5." (NCT02040766)
Timeframe: Day 1 to 12 weeks

InterventionDays (Median)
Placebo BAI and MDINA
BDP 80 mcg BAINA
BDP 160 mcg BAINA
BDP 80 mcg MDINA
BDP 160 mcg MDINA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period

"Asthma symptom scores were recorded in the patient's diary each morning and evening before determining FEV1 and PEF and before administration of study or rescue medications.~The Daytime Symptom Score was recorded in the evening on a scale of 0 (No symptoms during the day) to 5 (Symptoms so severe that I could not go to work or perform normal daily activities) plus the Nighttime Symptom Score in the morning on a scale of 0 (No symptoms during the night) to 4 (Symptoms so severe that I did not sleep at all) for a total score range of 0-9.~Baseline was defined as the average of recorded daily asthma symptom scores (average of daytime and nighttime score) over the 7 days prior to the first dose of study treatment, including the morning assessment at the randomization visit.~The LS means, difference of LS means and its 95% CI, and p value are obtained from the mixed model for repeated measures analysis with covariate adjustment for baseline, sex, age, current asthma therapy," (NCT02040779)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -6 to Day 1 pre-dose), daily up to Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BAI-0.166
BDP 80 mcg BAI-0.293
BDP 160 mcg BAI-0.304

[back to top]

Standardized Baseline-Adjusted Trough Morning Forced Expiratory Volume in One Minute (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time Zero to 12 Weeks (AUEC(0-12wk)) by Actual Treatment Received

"The primary efficacy variable was the standardized baseline-adjusted trough morning (pre-dose and pre-rescue bronchodilator) FEV1 AUEC(0-12wk). Pulmonary function measurements such as FEV1 were obtained electronically by spirometry at the randomization visit (Day 1), each treatment visit (Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12) and any unscheduled visit (such as the early termination visit). This summary is based on observed values recorded as 'best attempt'.~The least-square (LS) means, difference of LS means and its 95% confidence interval (CI), and p-value represent the results obtained from the analysis of covariance with covariate adjustment for baseline, sex, age, current asthma therapy, and treatment." (NCT02040779)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 predose), weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BAI0.048
BDP 80 mcg BAI0.171
BDP 160 mcg BAI0.164

[back to top]

Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormal Vital Sign Results During the Treatment Period

"Criteria for the select vital signs that showed a potentially clinically relevant abnormal result are:~Sitting systolic BP (low); <=90 mm Hg and decrease of >=20 mm Hg from baseline~Sitting diastolic BP (high): >=105 mm Hg and increase of >=15 mm Hg from baseline~Baseline is defined as the last available assessment prior to the first dose of double-blind study treatment (usually Day 1 predose)." (NCT02040779)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 predose), Visits at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=1 abnormalitySitting systolic BP (low)Sitting diastolic BP (high)
BDP 160 mcg BAI211
BDP 80 mcg BAI211
Placebo BAI211

[back to top]

Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed in this definition. (NCT02040779)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Week 12

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=1 adverse event>=1 severe TEAE>=1 treatment-related TEAE>=1 serious TEAE>=1 AE causing discontinuation
BDP 160 mcg BAI260200
BDP 80 mcg BAI320100
Placebo BAI282111

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Total Daily Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol Over Weeks 1-12

"Change from baseline in the use of rescue medication, albuterol/salbutamol, during the treatment period offers an indication of asthma control.~The LS means, difference of LS means and its 95% CI, and p-value are obtained from the mixed model for repeated measures analysis with covariate adjustment for baseline, sex, age, current asthma therapy, treatment, week and treatment by week interaction.~Baseline was defined as the average of recorded daily usage of albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol over the 7 days prior to the first dose of double-blind study treatment, including morning usage at the randomization visit." (NCT02040779)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -6 to Day 1 pre-dose), daily up to Week 12

Interventioninhalations (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BAI-0.010
BDP 80 mcg BAI-0.368
BDP 160 mcg BAI-0.398

[back to top]

Participants With Findings During Oropharyngeal Examination During Treatment

Oropharyngeal examinations were performed at every visit by a qualified healthcare professional: during treatment visits are summarized. Any visual evidence of oral candidiasis during the treatment period of the study was evaluated by obtaining and analyzing a swab of the suspect area for culturing. Appropriate therapy was to be initiated immediately at the discretion of the investigator and was not to be delayed for culture confirmation. (NCT02040779)
Timeframe: Visits at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=1 evidence of oral candidiasis appearanceParticipants with a positive culture
BDP 160 mcg BAI21
BDP 80 mcg BAI00
Placebo BAI00

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Study Drug Treatment Withdrawal Due to Meeting Stopping Criteria for Worsening Asthma During the 12-Week Treatment Period

"The time to patient study drug treatment withdrawal due to worsening asthma was defined as the number of days elapsed from the date of randomization to the date of withdrawal due to meeting stopping criteria. Alert criteria for individual patients with worsening asthma were designed to ensure patient safety. The investigator determined whether the patient's overall clinical picture is consistent with worsening asthma and if the patient should be withdrawn from study drug treatment (but not the study) and be placed on appropriate asthma therapy in the interest of patient safety.~An example of alert criteria is:~FEV1 as measured at the study center is below the FEV1 stability limit value calculated at randomization visit (Day 1).~Other criteria as defined in the protocol." (NCT02040779)
Timeframe: Treatment period: daily from Day 1 up to Week 12

Interventiondays (Median)
Placebo BAINA
BDP 80 mcg BAINA
BDP 160 mcg BAINA

[back to top]

Number of Participants Withdrawn From Study Due to Meeting Stopping Criteria for Worsening Asthma During the 12-Week Treatment Period

"A count of participants who were withdrawn from the study due to meeting stopping criteria. Alert criteria for individual patients with worsening asthma were designed to ensure patient safety. The investigator determined whether the patient's overall clinical picture is consistent with worsening asthma and if the patient should be withdrawn from study drug treatment (but not the study) and be placed on appropriate asthma therapy in the interest of patient safety.~An example of alert criteria is:~FEV1 as measured at the study center is below the FEV1 stability limit value calculated at randomization visit (Day 1).~Other criteria as defined in the protocol." (NCT02040779)
Timeframe: Treatment period: Day 1 up to Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo BAI5
BDP 80 mcg BAI2
BDP 160 mcg BAI0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12-Week Treatment Period

"A hand-held peak flow meter was provided to patients at the screening visit and used to determine the morning and evening PEF throughout the course of the study. The patient recorded the highest value of 3 measurements obtained in the morning and evening in the patient diary.~Baseline in evening PEF is defined as the average of recorded evening PEF assessments over the 7-day window before randomization.~The LS means, difference of LS means and its 95% confidence interval, and p value are obtained from the mixed model for repeated measures analysis with covariate adjustment for baseline, sex, age, current asthma therapy, treatment, week, and treatment by week interaction." (NCT02040779)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -6 to Day 1 pre-dose), daily up to Week 12

InterventionL/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BAI-0.797
BDP 80 mcg BAI10.105
BDP 160 mcg BAI4.608

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Trough Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Rate Over the 12-Week Treatment Period

"Change from baseline in the weekly average of daily trough morning (pre-dose and pre-rescue bronchodilator) PEF by handheld spirometer over the 12-week treatment period.~PEF were determined twice daily, in the morning and in the evening, before administration of study drug or rescue medications. A handheld spirometer was provided to patients and used to determine the morning and evening PEF throughout the study. The spirometer was programmed to record the highest PEF obtained from 3 valid attempts.~Baseline was defined as the average of recorded trough morning PEF assessments over the 7 days prior to the first dose of double-blind study treatment, including the morning assessment at the randomization visit.~The LS means, difference of LS means and its 95% confidence interval, and p value are obtained from the mixed model for repeated measures analysis with covariate adjustment for baseline, sex, age, current asthma therapy, treatment, week, and treatment by week interaction." (NCT02040779)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -6 to Day 1 pre-dose), daily up to Week 12

InterventionL/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BAI-0.795
BDP 80 mcg BAI12.849
BDP 160 mcg BAI7.116

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With a Change From Baseline Serum Lactate Following a One Hour Albuterol Nebulizer Treatment.

We powered our study to detect a difference of 0.5 mmol/L between pre and post-treatment lactate levels, but hypothesize that the difference will be greater than 1.0 mmol/L. (NCT02073747)
Timeframe: Change in serum lactate from baseline to 1 hour

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Normal Saline Control Group-0.15
Albuterol Trial Group0.77

[back to top]

Summary of Participants With Adverse Events

"Adverse events (AEs) summarized in this table are those that began or worsened after treatment with study drug (treatment-emergent AEs). An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator as mild (no limitation of usual activities), moderate, or severe (inability to carry out usual activities).~Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes." (NCT02126839)
Timeframe: 6 Months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventSevere adverse eventTreatment-related adverse eventDeathsOther serious AEWithdrawn from study due to AE
Albuterol MDPI 180 mcg QID2100000
Placebo MDPI QID2100000

[back to top]

Baseline Adjusted Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Area Under The Concentration Time Curve Up From Time Zero up to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) Over 3 Weeks

Serial PEF measurements were obtained via spirometry. PEF measures for purpose of serial PEF assessment (pre and postdose) were collected from the spirometer assessed PEF, utilizing the values from the efforts selected based on the highest of 3 acceptable FEV1 maneuvers. (NCT02126839)
Timeframe: 30 ±5 and 5 ±2 minutes prior to dosing, and at 5 ±2, 15 ±5, 30 ±5, 45 ±5, 60 ±10, 120 ±10, 240 ±10, and 360 ±10 minutes after completion of dosing on Days 1 and 22

InterventionLiters/min*hour (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo MDPI QID71.52
Albuterol MDPI 180 mcg QID147.85

[back to top]

Baseline Adjusted Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under The Concentration Time Curve Up From Time Zero up to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) Over 3 Weeks

Following measurement of the baseline FEV1 and dose administration on Days 1 and 22, FEV1 values (highest of 3 acceptable maneuvers) will be obtained at 5 (±2), 15 (±5), 30 (±5), 45 (±5), 60 (±10), 120 (±10), 240 (±10), and 360 (±10) minutes after the completion of dosing. Predicted FEV1 values were computed and adjusted for age, height, and gender according to Eigen et al (Eigen et al 2001) for participants 4 to 5 years of age and to Quanjer et al (Quanjer et al 1995) for participants aged 6 to 11 years using ATS criteria (American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement 2007). (NCT02126839)
Timeframe: 30 ±5 and 5 ±2 minutes prior to dosing, and at 5 ±2, 15 ±5, 30 ±5, 45 ±5, 60 ±10, 120 ±10, 240 ±10, and 360 ±10 minutes after completion of dosing on Days 1 and 22

Intervention% predicted FEV1/hour (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo MDPI QID18.71
Albuterol MDPI 180 mcg QID43.73

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morning Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12

"Trough FEV1 was a morning spirometry taken predose and pre-rescue bronchodilator. If the patient inadvertently administered asthma medication/study drug at home on the AM of the visit, or if the patient took rescue medication within 6 hours of testing, the visit was rescheduled.~The baseline for predose FEV1 was defined as the average of the 30-minute and 10-minute predose measurements obtained at the randomization visit (Day 1)." (NCT02139644)
Timeframe: Day 1 (predose, baseline), Week 12

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg0.315
FS MDPI 50 / 12.5 mcg0.319
Fp MDPI 100 mcg0.204
Fp MDPI 50 mcg0.172
Placebo MDPI0.053

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)) Score at Endpoint for Patients >=18 Years Old

"The AQLQ(S) (September 2010 version; patients aged ≥18 years) was self-administered by the patients at the investigational center at the randomization visit and at Week 12 or end of trial. The questionnaire is a tool to measure the impact of asthma on a patient's quality of life (physical, emotional, social, and occupational) with a recall period of 2 weeks. The AQLQ(S) was administered only to patients 18 years and older. The 32 individual questions in the AQLQ were equally weighted. The overall AQLQ score was the mean of the responses to each of the 32 questions, and ranged from 1 to 7. A score of 7.0 indicated that the patient had no impairments due to asthma and a score of 1.0 indicated severe impairment.~Positive change from baseline scores indicate improved quality of life." (NCT02139644)
Timeframe: Day 1 (predose, baseline), end of trial (up to week 12)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg0.808
FS MDPI 50 / 12.5 mcg0.565
Fp MDPI 100 mcg0.636
Fp MDPI 50 mcg0.588
Placebo MDPI0.335

[back to top]

Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period

An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relationship of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. (NCT02139644)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 12 of the Treatment Period

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=1 TEAE>=1 severe TEAE>=1 treatment-related TEAE>=1 severe treatment-related TEAE>=1 serious TEAE>=1 TEAE leading to withdrawal>=1 nonserious TEAE>=1 TEAE resulting in death
Fp MDPI 100 mcg4015012390
Fp MDPI 50 mcg4417001440
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg3724010360
FS MDPI 50 / 12.5 mcg4604003460
Placebo MDPI4705026450

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 1

"A subset of approximately 300 patients who performed postdose serial spirometry is based on sample size calculation. Baseline FEV1 was the average of 2 FEV1 measurements (30 and 10 minutes predose) on Day 1. If one of these was missing, the other measurement was used as baseline value. If both were missing, baseline was treated as missing. Time to target improvement (15% or 12%) was defined as the time elapsed from the time of first dose to the first time the target improvement in FEV1 was achieved. If an exact target increase was not achieved at a measured timepoint, then the time was estimated by linear interpolation between the timepoint when target was reached and the timepoint immediately before. Patients who did not achieve the target improvement were censored at the time of last serial spirometry assessment.~Values of 9999 indicate the values could not be estimated which happened when the estimated probability of not achieving target is more than 50%." (NCT02139644)
Timeframe: Day 1 of the Treatment Period (predose and postdose)

,,,,
Interventionhours (Median)
15% improvement12% improvement
Fp MDPI 100 mcgNANA
Fp MDPI 50 mcgNANA
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg4.31.0
FS MDPI 50 / 12.5 mcg1.30.5
Placebo MDPINANA

[back to top]

Standardized Baseline-Adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Postdose (FEV1 AUEC0-12h) at Week 12

"A subset of approximately 300 patients who performed postdose serial spirometry is based on sample size calculation. Data from these assessments were used to analyze the primary endpoint of baseline adjusted FEV1 AUEC0-12h at week 12 using the trapezoidal rule based on actual time of measurement. It was standardized by dividing it by the number of hours between the start time of dose administration and the end time of the last nonmissing FEV1 measurement.~The baseline FEV1 was the average of the 2 predose FEV1 measurements (30 and 10 minutes predose). If 1 of these was missing, the nonmissing value was used; if both were missing, baseline was treated as missing. Baseline-adjusted FEV1 was calculated as postdose FEV1 after subtracting the baseline FEV1 value." (NCT02139644)
Timeframe: Day 1 (predose, baseline), Week 12 and was performed at the following times relative to the administration of study drug (±5 minutes): 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg0.408
FS MDPI 50 / 12.5 mcg0.399
Fp MDPI 100 mcg0.254
Fp MDPI 50 mcg0.268
Placebo MDPI0.074

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Remaining in Study At Week 12

The analysis of probability of remaining in the study at Week 12 used the time to patient withdrawal for worsening asthma, defined as the number of days elapsed from the date of randomization to the date of withdrawal due to worsening asthma. Patients who were lost to follow-up, who had not withdrawn due to worsening asthma by week 12, or who had withdrawn due to reasons other than worsening asthma were right-censored at the date of last assessment. (NCT02139644)
Timeframe: up to Week 12 of the Treatment Period

Interventionprobability (Number)
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg1.0000
FS MDPI 50 / 12.5 mcg0.9917
Fp MDPI 100 mcg0.9919
Fp MDPI 50 mcg0.9919
Placebo MDPI0.9681

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period

"The total daily asthma symptom score is the average of the daytime and nighttime scores as recorded in the patient diary (range 0-9).~Daytime Symptom Score:~0=No symptoms~Symptoms for 1 short period~Symptoms for 2+ short periods~Symptoms for most of the day - did not affect normal daily activities~Symptoms for most of the day - did affect normal daily activities~Symptoms so severe that I could not go to work or perform normal daily activities~Nighttime Symptom Score (determined in the AM):~0=No symptoms~Symptoms causing me to wake once (or wake early)~Symptoms causing me to wake twice or more (including waking early)~Symptoms causing me to be awake for most of the night~Symptoms so severe that I did not sleep Baseline was the average of recorded scores over the 7 days before randomization. The change from baseline in the weekly average over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM)." (NCT02139644)
Timeframe: Days -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline) to Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg-0.364
FS MDPI 50 / 12.5 mcg-0.329
Fp MDPI 100 mcg-0.300
Fp MDPI 50 mcg-0.278
Placebo MDPI-0.135

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol Over the 12-Week Treatment Period

Patients recorded the number of inhalations of rescue medication (albuterol/salbutamol HFA MDI) each AM and PM in the diary. The average number of daily inhalations over the 7 days before the randomization visit was the baseline value. The weekly average was based on the available data for the 7 days before each analysis week. The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures. (NCT02139644)
Timeframe: Days -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), up to week 12

Interventionpuffs (Least Squares Mean)
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg-0.677
FS MDPI 50 / 12.5 mcg-0.706
Fp MDPI 100 mcg-0.466
Fp MDPI 50 mcg-0.467
Placebo MDPI-0.003

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Morning Trough Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12 Week Treatment

Morning PEF tests were performed before administration of study drug or rescue medications (data were excluded if the time of PEF measurement was more than 5 minutes after the dose time). The patient recorded the highest value of 3 measurements obtained in the patient diary. The baseline PEF was the average value of recorded (nonmissing) morning assessments over the 7 days prior to randomization on Day 1. For efficacy analyses of weekly average morning PEF measurements, values were the averages based on available data for that week. (NCT02139644)
Timeframe: Days -6 to Day 1 (predose), Day 1 (postdose) daily until Week 12

Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg24.415
FS MDPI 50 / 12.5 mcg24.864
Fp MDPI 100 mcg14.517
Fp MDPI 50 mcg10.609
Placebo MDPI3.591

[back to top]

Echocardiogram

to compare inhaled albuterol-induced changes in echocardiogram measuring mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP)in healthy current smokers and lifetime non-smokers as an index of endothelial function in the pulmonary circulation and to compare the results between smokers and non-smokers (NCT02141633)
Timeframe: MPAP before and 15 minutes after albuterol inhalation in smokers vs non-smokers

InterventionΔMPAP (mmHg) (Mean)
Smokers-7.70
Non-smokers-9.04

[back to top]

Airway Blood Flow

compare inhaled albuterol-induced changes in airway blood flow (ΔQaw) in healthy current smokers and lifetime non-smokers as an index of endothelial function in the airway circulation and to compare the results between smokers and non-smokers (NCT02141633)
Timeframe: before and 15 minutes after albuterol inhalation

InterventionΔQaw (ul/min/ml) (Mean)
Smokers2.13
Non-smokers13.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Morning Trough Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12 Week Treatment

"Morning PEF tests were performed before administration of study drug or rescue medications (data were excluded if the time of PEF measurement was more than 5 minutes after the dose time). The patient recorded the highest value of 3 measurements obtained in the patient diary.~The baseline PEF was the average value of recorded (nonmissing) morning assessments over the 7 days prior to randomization on Day 1. For efficacy analyses of weekly average morning PEF measurements, values were the averages based on available data for that week." (NCT02141854)
Timeframe: Days -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), Day 1 (postdose) daily until Week 12

Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg20.235
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg18.610
Fp MDPI 200 mcg7.464
Fp MDPI 100 mcg5.731
Placebo MDPI-10.987

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol Over the 12-Week Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the number of inhalations of rescue medication (albuterol/salbutamol HFA MDI) each AM and PM in the diary. The average number of daily inhalations over the 7 days before the randomization visit was the baseline value. The weekly average was based on the available data for the 7 days before each analysis week.~The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures." (NCT02141854)
Timeframe: Days -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), up to week 12

Interventionpuffs (Least Squares Mean)
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg-0.898
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg-0.821
Fp MDPI 200 mcg-0.534
Fp MDPI 100 mcg-0.439
Placebo MDPI0.168

[back to top]

Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period

An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. (NCT02141854)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 12 of the Treatment Period

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=1 TEAE>=1 severe TEAE>=1 treatment-related TEAE>=1 severe treatment-related TEAE>=1 serious TEAE>=1 TEAE leading to withdrawal>=1 nonserious TEAE>=1 TEAE resulting in death
Fp MDPI 100 mcg5316012520
Fp MDPI 200 mcg6009010600
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg5924022581
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg6138122610
Placebo MDPI5215012520

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 1

"The baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was the average of the 2 predose FEV1 measurements (30 and 10 minutes predose) on Day 1. If one of these was missing, the other measurement was used as baseline value. If both were missing, the baseline trough FEV1 was treated as missing.~Time to target improvement (15% or 12%) was defined as the time elapsed from the time of first dose to the first time the target improvement in FEV1 was achieved. If an exact target increase was not achieved at a measured timepoint, then the time was estimated by linear interpolation between the timepoint when target was reached and the timepoint immediately before. Patients who did not achieve the target improvement were censored at the time of last serial spirometry assessment.~Values of NA indicate the values could not be estimated which happened when the estimated probability of not achieving target is more than 50%." (NCT02141854)
Timeframe: Day 1 of the Treatment Period (predose and postdose)

,,,,
Interventionhours (Median)
15% improvement12% improvement
Fp MDPI 100 mcgNANA
Fp MDPI 200 mcgNA6.9
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg0.90.4
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg0.80.4
Placebo MDPINANA

[back to top]

Standardized Baseline-Adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours PostDose (FEV1 AUEC0-12) at Week 12

A subset of patients performed postdose serial spirometry. Data from these assessments were used to analyze the primary endpoint of baseline-adjusted FEV1 AUEC0-12h at week 12 using the trapezoidal rule based on actual time of measurement. It was standardized by dividing it by the number of hours between the start time of dose administration and the end time of the last nonmissing FEV1 measurement. The baseline FEV1 was the average of the 2 predose FEV1 measurements (30 and 10 minutes predose). If 1 of these was missing, the nonmissing value was used; if both were missing, baseline was treated as missing. Baseline-adjusted FEV1 was calculated as postdose FEV1 after subtracting the baseline FEV1 value. (NCT02141854)
Timeframe: Day 1 (predose, baseline), Week 12 and was performed at the following times relative to the administration of study drug (±5 minutes): 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg0.446
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg0.442
Fp MDPI 200 mcg0.267
Fp MDPI 100 mcg0.260
Placebo MDPI0.121

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Remaining in Study At Week 12

The analysis of probability of remaining in the study at Week 12 used the time to patient withdrawal for worsening asthma, defined as the number of days elapsed from the date of randomization to the date of withdrawal due to worsening asthma. Patients who were lost to follow-up, who had not withdrawn due to worsening asthma by week 12, or who had withdrawn due to reasons other than worsening asthma were right-censored at the date of last assessment. (NCT02141854)
Timeframe: up to Week 12 of the Treatment Period

Interventionprobability (Number)
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg0.9719
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg0.9929
Fp MDPI 200 mcg0.9786
Fp MDPI 100 mcg0.9930
Placebo MDPI0.8528

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period

"The total daily asthma symptom score is the average of the daytime and nighttime scores as recorded in the patient diary.~Daytime Symptom Score:~0=No symptoms~1=Symptoms for 1 short period~2=Symptoms for 2+ short periods~3=Symptoms for most of the day - did not affect normal daily activities~4=Symptoms for most of the day - did affect normal daily activities~5=Symptoms so severe that I could not go to work or perform normal daily activities~Nighttime Symptom Score (determined in the AM):~0=No symptoms~1=Symptoms causing me to wake once (or wake early)~2=Symptoms causing me to wake twice or more (including waking early)~3=Symptoms causing me to be awake for most of the night~4=Symptoms so severe that I did not sleep Baseline was the average of recorded scores over the 7 days before randomization. The change from baseline in the weekly average over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM)." (NCT02141854)
Timeframe: Days -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), to Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg-0.391
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg-0.364
Fp MDPI 200 mcg-0.242
Fp MDPI 100 mcg-0.282
Placebo MDPI-0.087

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morning Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12

Trough FEV1 is a morning spirometry taken predose and pre-rescue bronchodilator. The baseline for predose FEV1 was defined as the average of the 30-minute and 10-minute predose measurements obtained at the randomization visit (Day 1). (NCT02141854)
Timeframe: Day 1 (predose, baseline), Week 12

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg0.272
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg0.271
Fp MDPI 200 mcg0.179
Fp MDPI 100 mcg0.119
Placebo MDPI-0.004

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)) Score at Endpoint for Patients >=18 Years Old

"The AQLQ(S) (September 2010 version; patients aged ≥18 years) was self administered by the patients at the investigational center at the randomization visit and at Week 12 or end of trial. The questionnaire is a tool to measure the impact of asthma on a patient's quality of life (physical, emotional, social, and occupational) with a recall period of 2 weeks. The AQLQ(S) was administered only to patients 18 years and older. The 32 individual questions in the AQLQ were equally weighted. The overall AQLQ score was the mean of the responses to each of the 32 questions, and ranged from 1 to 7. A score 7.0 indicated that the patient had no impairments due to asthma and a score of 1.0 indicated severe impairment.~Positive change from baseline scores indicate improved quality of life." (NCT02141854)
Timeframe: Day 1 (predose, baseline), end of trial (up to week 12)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg0.534
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg0.592
Fp MDPI 200 mcg0.384
Fp MDPI 100 mcg0.340
Placebo MDPI-0.089

[back to top]

The Overall Safety of Treatment With Levalbuterol Tartrate HFA Inhalation Aerosol as Measured by the Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events.

Due to early termination of the study, insufficient data were available to perform the statistical analyses described in the protocol. Only subject listings of disposition, demographics, medical history and safety data were provided. (NCT02150499)
Timeframe: Week 1

InterventionNumber of Serious Adverse Events (Number)
Levalbuterol Tartrate HFA Inhalation Aerosol Plus Placebo HFA0
Levalbuterol Tartrate HFA Inhalation Aerosol Plus Levalbuterol0

[back to top]

The Overall Safety of Treatment With Levalbuterol Tartrate HFA Inhalation Aerosol as Measured by the Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation.

Due to early termination of the study, insufficient data were available to perform the statistical analyses described in the protocol. Only subject listings of disposition, demographics, medical history and safety data were provided. (NCT02150499)
Timeframe: Week 1

InterventionNumber of Discontinuations (Number)
Levalbuterol Tartrate HFA Inhalation Aerosol Plus Placebo HFA0
Levalbuterol Tartrate HFA Inhalation Aerosol Plus Levalbuterol0

[back to top]

The Overall Safety of Treatment With Levalbuterol Tartrate HFA Inhalation Aerosol as Measured by the Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events.

Due to early termination of the study, insufficient data were available to perform the statistical analyses described in the protocol. Only subject listings of disposition, demographics, medical history and safety data were provided. (NCT02150499)
Timeframe: Week 1

InterventionNumber of Adverse Events (Number)
Levalbuterol Tartrate HFA Inhalation Aerosol Plus Placebo HFA4
Levalbuterol Tartrate HFA Inhalation Aerosol Plus Levalbuterol6

[back to top]

Change in Maximum Forced Expiratory Volume at One Second (FEV1)

(NCT02170532)
Timeframe: Baseline (before treatment), 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post treatment

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of change (Mean)
30 minutes1 hour2 hour4 hour6 hour8 hour
Levalbuterol + Ipratroprium in a Breath Actuated Nebulizer2023221419
Levalbuterol + Saline in a Breath Actuated Nebulizer2028261501
Levalbuterol MDI + Aerochamber Max With 2 Second Pause 2 Puffs2124197-6-6
Levalbuterol MDI + Aerochamber Max Without Pause 2 Puffs192019610
Levalbuterol Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) 2 Puffs2019207-5-3

[back to top]

Change in 8 Hour Area-under-the-curve FEV1

(NCT02170532)
Timeframe: 0 to 8 hours post dose

Interventionpercentage of change (Mean)
Levalbuterol + Saline in a Breath Actuated Nebulizer5450
Levalbuterol + Ipratroprium in a Breath Actuated Nebulizer4729
Levalbuterol MDI 2 Puffs3893
Levalbuterol MDI + Aerochamber Max Without Pause 2 Puffs3805
Levalbuterol MDI + Aerochamber Max With 2 Second Pause 2 Puffs4195

[back to top]

Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period

An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relationship of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. (NCT02175771)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 26 of the Treatment Period

,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=1 TEAE>=1 severe TEAE>=1 treatment-related TEAE>=1 severe treatment-related TEAE>=1 serious TEAE>=1 TEAE leading to withdrawal>=1 nonserious TEAE>=1 TEAE resulting in death
ADVAIR DISKUS 250/50 mcg2914022280
ADVAIR DISKUS 500/50 mcg3038031290
FLOVENT HFA 110 mcg2932021270
FLOVENT HFA 220 mcg2935031290
Fp MDPI 100 mcg85810072850
Fp MDPI 200 mcg83116080820
FS MDPI 100/12.5 mcg9289063910
FS MDPI 200/12.5 mcg8612110130850

[back to top]

Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs During the Treatment Period

"Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values during the Treatment period.~Significance criteria:~Systolic blood pressure - high: >=180 and increase >=20 mmHg~Systolic blood pressure - low: <=90 and decrease >=20 mmHg~Diastolic blood pressure - high: >=105 and increase of >=15 mmHg~Diastolic blood pressure - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 mmHg~Pulse - high: >=120 and increase of >= 15 beats/minute from baseline~Pulse - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 beats/minute" (NCT02175771)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 pre-treatment), Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 26, Endpoint

,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=1 abnormalitySystolic blood pressure - highSystolic blood pressure - lowDiastolic blood pressure - highDiastolic blood pressure - lowPulse - highPulse - low
ADVAIR DISKUS 250/50 mcg0000000
ADVAIR DISKUS 500/50 mcg0000000
FLOVENT HFA 110 mcg0000000
FLOVENT HFA 220 mcg1000100
Fp MDPI 100 mcg5011111
Fp MDPI 200 mcg0000000
FS MDPI 100/12.5 mcg2010100
FS MDPI 200/12.5 mcg2001100

[back to top]

Analysis of 24-Hour Urine Cortisol Free Over the 26-Week Treatment Period

"Samples for 24-hour urine cortisol were collected at baseline (Day 1, pretreatment), and Weeks 14 and 26. For participants requiring early termination (ET), this evaluation was performed at the ET visit. For participants requiring ET for safety reasons, the visit was not delayed in order to collect the 24-hour urine cortisol.~The analysis is based on a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) model with adjustment for visit, treatment, and a treatment*visit interaction. The urine cortisol result is log transformed prior to analysis and the results are back transformed after modeling. An unstructured covariance matrix is used in the MMRM model." (NCT02175771)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, pre-treatment), Weeks 14 and 26 and early termination visit if applicable

Interventionmcg/24 hours (Geometric Mean)
Fp MDPI 100 mcg18.45
FLOVENT HFA 110 mcg13.94
Fp MDPI 200 mcg14.14
FLOVENT HFA 220 mcg17.50
FS MDPI 100/12.5 mcg17.56
ADVAIR DISKUS 250/50 mcg18.29
FS MDPI 200/12.5 mcg13.02
ADVAIR DISKUS 500/50 mcg15.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Minute (FEV1) Over the 26-Week Treatment Period

"Spirometry measurements were obtained before the AM dose of study drug for the randomization visit (Day 1), at each of the treatment visits and at the early termination visit if applicable. At each visit where FEV1 was assessed, the highest acceptable results from each session were recorded.~The analysis is based on a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with adjustment for baseline FEV1, sex, age, (pooled) investigational center, visit, treatment, and treatment-by-visit. An unstructured covariance matrix is used in the MMRM model." (NCT02175771)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 pre-treatment), Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 26, early termination visit if applicable

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Fp MDPI 100 mcg0.062
FLOVENT HFA 110 mcg0.053
Fp MDPI 200 mcg0.077
FLOVENT HFA 220 mcg0.090
FS MDPI 100/12.5 mcg0.116
ADVAIR DISKUS 250/50 mcg0.117
FS MDPI 200/12.5 mcg0.100
ADVAIR DISKUS 500/50 mcg0.041

[back to top]

Participants With Positive Swab Test Results for Oral Candidiasis

"Oropharyngeal examinations for visual evidence of oral candidiasis were conducted at each visit by a qualified healthcare professional. Any visual evidence of oral candidiasis during the oropharyngeal exam was evaluated by obtaining and analyzing a swab of the suspect area.~This outcomes indicates how many participants had positive swab test results. The total number of participants who had oropharyngeal exams at each timepoint are specified in the timepoint field. Appropriate therapy was to be initiated immediately at the discretion of the investigator and was not to be delayed for culture confirmation. Participants with a culture-positive infection could continue participation in the study on appropriate anti-infective therapy, provided this therapy was not prohibited by the protocol." (NCT02175771)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 pre-treatment), Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 26, Endpoint

,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline (n=127, 42, 124, 41, 120, 41, 133, 44)Week 2 (n=123, 42, 123, 40, 117, 39, 131, 43)Week 6 (n=119, 41, 119, 40, 115, 39, 125, 43)Week 10 (n=119, 37, 118, 39, 115, 39, 120, 40)Week 14 (n=116, 36, 115, 38, 113, 38, 120, 41)Week 18 (n=111, 37, 115, 38, 109, 38, 117, 40)Week 22 (n=110, 36, 113, 36, 110, 37, 116, 38)Week 26 (n=111, 35, 113, 36, 110, 36, 116, 38)Endpoint (n=125, 42, 123, 41, 119, 40, 132, 44)
ADVAIR DISKUS 250/50 mcg002101011
ADVAIR DISKUS 500/50 mcg020110200
FLOVENT HFA 110 mcg000000000
FLOVENT HFA 220 mcg000111111
Fp MDPI 100 mcg221011111
Fp MDPI 200 mcg010111111
FS MDPI 100/12.5 mcg011120100
FS MDPI 200/12.5 mcg011010200

[back to top]

Shifts From Baseline to Endpoint in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

A 12 lead ECG was conducted at the screening visit and week 26 or the early termination visit. A qualified physician at a central diagnostic center was responsible for interpreting the ECG. The worst post-baseline finding for the participant is summarized. Endpoint refers to the last observation carried forward. (NCT02175771)
Timeframe: Screening (Day -14), Endpoint (week 26 if study was completed)

,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline normal - Endpoint normalBaseline normal - Endpoint abnormalBaseline abnormal - Endpoint normalBaseline abnormal - Endpoint abnormal
ADVAIR DISKUS 250/50 mcg30224
ADVAIR DISKUS 500/50 mcg28344
FLOVENT HFA 110 mcg31512
FLOVENT HFA 220 mcg33123
Fp MDPI 100 mcg898411
Fp MDPI 200 mcg936413
FS MDPI 100/12.5 mcg909125
FS MDPI 200/12.5 mcg101897

[back to top]

Change From BL in Asthma Control Test (ACT) at 4 Wks for Each TP

ACT was basically a five item questionnaire, to measure participant's asthma control. It comprised of five possible answers to each question, associated with a score of 1 to 5 (1=poor control and 5=good control), wherein the scores from each question were summed to give an overall score (5=poor control and 25=complete control). ACT was recommended during each visit and was completed by the participant before any procedures were performed, avoiding any influence of the participants response. Change from BL was analysed using mixed effects ANCOVA model fitting terms for subject-level (SL) BL, Adjusted period-specific(PS) BL, treatment group and period, with participant as random effect. PS BL value, is pre-dose assessment collected on D1 of each TP. SL BL, is arithmetic mean of PS BL values of participant. Participants with an ACT below 15 were excluded from the study. (NCT02233803)
Timeframe: BL up to W4 (each TP)

Interventionunits on scale (Least Squares Mean)
NEUMOTEROL 4001.6
SYMBICORT FORTE1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (BL) in Trough Morning Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Day (D)29

FEV1 is maximal amount of air, forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 is defined as morning prebronchodilator and predose: 12 hours (h) after last evening dose D28 at end of each TP. Measured by spirometer in morning, before using bronchodilator and pre-dosing at wk1 D1 and wk4 D29 of each TP and test was performed within 30 minutes prior to dosing. Change from BL was analysed using mixed effects ANCOVA model fitting terms for subject-level (SL) BL, Adjusted period-specific (PS) BL, treatment group and period, with participant as random effect. PS BL value is pre-dose assessment collected on D1 of each TP. SL BL is arithmetic mean of PS BL values of participant. If only one of PS BL value is missing for participant, SL BL took value of other BL. If both PS BL values were missing, SL BL was set to missing. Period level BL=PS BL - associated SL BL. (NCT02233803)
Timeframe: BL (D1) and D29 (each TP)

InterventionLitre (L) (Least Squares Mean)
NEUMOTEROL 4000.194
SYMBICORT FORTE0.150

[back to top]

FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-10 h) at D1 of Each TP

FEV1 is the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. FEV1 AUC (0 to 10h) was measured at beginning of each TP. AUC was derived using values observed at the following timepoints: 0 minute (pre-morning dosing), 5 minutes (m), 15m, 30m, 1, 2, 5, and 10h; post morning dosing FEV1 values on D1 of each TP. Pre-dose was taken as, 0h timepoint on the visit of interest, and all subsequent timepoints were calculated relative to that timepoint. FEV1 AUC was analysed using mixed effects ANCOVA model fitting terms for subject-level (SL) BL, Adjusted period-specific(PS) BL, treatment group and period, with participant as random effect. (NCT02233803)
Timeframe: (0-10 h) at D1 (each TP)

InterventionL*hrs (Least Squares Mean)
NEUMOTEROL 40024.573
SYMBICORT FORTE23.593

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) on Day 85

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 on Day 85 is defined as the mean of the FEV1 values obtained 23 and 24 hours after dosing on Day 84 (Week 12). Trough FEV1 was measured using spirometry. BL FEV1 is the mean of the two assessments made 30 and 5 minutes (min) pre-dose on Day 1.Change from BL was calculated as the trough FEV1 value on Day 85 minus the BL value. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures with covariates of treatment, BL FEV1 (mean of the values measured at 30 min and 5 min pre-dose on Day 1), type of ICS/LABA, smoking status, Day, Day by BL interaction and Day by treatment interaction, where Day is nominal. (NCT02257372)
Timeframe: Baseline (BL) and Day 85

InterventionLiter (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo+ICS/LABA-0.033
Umeclidinium 62.5 mcg+ICS/LABA0.090

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weighted Mean 0-6 Hour FEV1 Obtained Post-dose on Day 84

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. The weighted mean FEV1 was derived by calculating the area under the curve, and then dividing the value by the relevant time interval. The weighted mean was calculated by performing six-hour serial spirometry from the pre-dose FEV1 and post-dose FEV1 measurements at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 3 hours and 6 hours. Baseline FEV1 is the mean of the two assessments made 30 and 5 min pre-dose on Treatment Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as weighted mean value on Day 84 minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures with covariates of treatment, baseline FEV1 (mean of the values measured at 30 min and 5 min pre-dose on Day 1), type of ICS/LABA , smoking status, Day, Day by baseline interaction and Day by treatment interaction, where Day is nominal. (NCT02257372)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

InterventionLiter (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo+ICS/LABA0.035
Umeclidinium 62.5 mcg+ICS/LABA0.184

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) on Treatment Day 85 (Visit 8)

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in 1 second. BL was the mean of the 2 assessments made 30 and 5 minutes (min) pre-dose (PD) on Day 1. Trough FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry on Days 2, 28, 56, 84 and 85. Trough FEV1 on Day 85 is defined as the mean of the FEV1 values obtained at 23 and 24 hours (hr) after dosing on Day 84 (at Week 12 + 1 day). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures (RM) with covariates of trt, BL FEV1 (mean of values measured at 30 and 5 min PD on Day 1), center group, day, day by BL interaction and day by trt interaction, where day was nominal. (NCT02257385)
Timeframe: Baseline (BL) and Day 85

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 62.5/25 µg0.172
Indacaterol 150 µg + Tiotropium Bromide 18 µg0.171

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weighted Mean (WM) FEV1 Over 0-6 Hour Post-dose at Day 84

BL FEV1 was the mean of the 2 assessments made 30 and 5 min PD on Day 1. WM FEV1 derived by calculating the area under the FEV1/time curve (AUC) using the trapezoidal rule, and then dividing the value by the time interval over which the AUC was calculated. The WM was calculated at Days 1 and 84 using the 0-6 hr post-dose FEV1 measurements collected on that day, which included PD FEV1 (taken 30 and 5 min prior to dosing on Day 1 and the 30 and 5 min reading prior to dosing on Day 84) and post-dose FEV1 measurements at 1, 3 and 6 hr post-dose.WM change from BL was the WM at at the visit minus the BL value. Analysis was performed using a RM model with covariates of trt, BL FEV1 (mean of values measured at 30 and 5 min PD on Day 1) center group, day, day by BL and day by trt interaction, where day was nominal. Only par with data available at the specified TP were analyzed but all par w/o missing covariate information and with >=1 post-BL measurement were included in the analysis. (NCT02257385)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 62.5/25 µg0.235
Indacaterol 150 µg + Tiotropium Bromide 18 µg0.258

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) 3 Hours Post-dose at Week 12 of Each Treatment Period

FRC is defined as the amount of air still left in the lungs after breathing out normally. Standard body plethysmography techniques were used for lung volumes. Baseline is the assessment recorded before dosing on Day 1 of each period. Mean Baseline is the mean of the Baselines for each participant. Period Baseline is the difference between the Baseline and the mean Baseline in each treatment period for each participant. FRC 3 hours post-dose was measured from the value obtained 3 hours after dosing on Day 2 and Week 12. Analysis was performed using a repeated measures model and the following covariates were included: period Baseline, mean Baseline, period, treatment, visit, smoking status, visit by period Baseline, visit by mean Baseline and visit by treatment interactions. (NCT02275052)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Week 12 of each treatment period (up to Week 30)

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg-0.457
Placebo-0.111

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Exercise Endurance Time (EET) Post-dose at Week 12 of Each Treatment Period

EET post-dose at W12 is defined as the EET obtained 3 hours after dosing at W12. EET was measured using the externally paced field walking test called endurance shuttle walk test (ESWT). Change from BL in EET at W12 was analyzed using a repeated measures model with covariates of period walking speed, mean walking speed, period, trt, visit (Day 2, W6 and W12), smoking status, visit by period walking speed, visit by mean walking speed and visit by trt interactions. BL was the EET assessment obtained prior to dosing on Day 1 of each period. The mean walking speed for each par. is the mean of the levels used for the ESWT in each of the two trt periods. Period walking speed for each par. and trt period is the difference between the level for that par. and period and the mean walking speed for that par. Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population: all randomized par., excluding those who were randomized in error, and par. who discontinued trt (off-trt). (NCT02275052)
Timeframe: Baseline (BL) and at Week (W) 12 of each treatment (trt) period (up to Week 30)

InterventionSeconds (s) (Least Squares Mean)
UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg-2.06
Placebo-5.37

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 12 of Each Treatment Period

Trough FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the mean of FEV1 values obtained 23 and 24 hours after dosing on the previous day. Trough FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry on Day 2, Week 6 and Week 12. Baseline was the assessment recorded before dosing on Day 1 of each period. Mean Baseline is the mean of the Baselines for each participant. Period Baseline is the difference between the Baseline and the mean Baseline in each treatment period for each participant. Analysis was performed using a repeated measures model and the following covariates were included: period Baseline, mean Baseline, period, treatment, visit, smoking status, visit by period Baseline, visit by mean Baseline and visit by treatment interactions. (NCT02275052)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Week 12 of each treatment period (up to Week 30)

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg0.173
Placebo-0.034

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Inspiratory Capacity (IC) 3 Hours Post-dose at Week 12 of Each Treatment Period

IC is defined as the maximum amount of air that can be inhaled into the lungs from the normal resting position after breathing out normally. Standard body plethysmography techniques were used for lung volumes. Baseline is the IC value recorded pre-dose on Day 1 of each treatment period. Mean Baseline is the mean of the Baselines for each par. Period Baseline is the difference between the Baseline and the mean Baseline in each treatment period for each par. IC 3-hours post-dose was measured from the value obtained 3 hours after dosing on Day 2 and Week 12. Analysis performed using a repeated measures model with covariates of period Baseline, mean Baseline, period, treatment, visit (Day 2 or Week 12), smoking status, visit by period Baseline, visit by mean Baseline and visit by treatment interactions. (NCT02275052)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Week 12 of each treatment period (up to Week 30)

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg0.225
Placebo-0.034

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Spirometry Parameters in Pre and Post Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1); Pre and Post Forced Vital Capacity (FVC); Pre and Post Forced Expiratory Volume in 6 Seconds (FEV6).

Pre and post FEV1, FVC and FEV6 were performed at Screening, Day 1 pre-dose and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, 39 and 52. Par. were asked to withheld all bronchodilator therapy included ipratropiumn bromide and salbutamol/albuterol for at least 4 hours prior to prebronchodilator spirometric test. Post-bronchodilator spirometric assessment was performed after inhalation of 400/360 micograms (µg) of salbutamol/albuterol in 10-15 minutes. Day 1 (pre-dose) values were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. The maximum value of the 3 replicate assessments were used. Analysis performed using a mixed-effects repeated measures model. The adjusted mean values were summarized per treatment group. Par. were included in the analysis if they had at least one post-baseline measurement. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 52

,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
FEV1 pre-dose, Week 2, n = 90, 83FEV1 Pre-dose, Week 4, n=88, 82FEV1 Pre-dose, Week 8, n=81, 79FEV1 Pre-dose, Week 12, n=78, 71FEV1 Pre-dose, Week 18, n=67, 61FEV1 Pre-dose, Week 26, n=53, 52FEV1 Pre-dose, Week 39, n=28, 28FEV1 Pre-dose, Week 52, n=14, 11FEV1 post-dose, Week 2, n=89, 82FEV1 post-dose, Week 4, n=87, 81FEV1 post-dose, Week 8, n=80, 78FEV1 post-dose, Week 12, n=76, 69FEV1 post-dose, Week 18, n=66, 60FEV1 post-dose, Week 26, n=52, 51FEV1 post-dose, Week 39, n=27, 27FEV1 post-dose, Week 52, n=13, 10FEV6 pre-dose, Week 2, n = 90,82FEV6 Pre-dose, Week 4, n=87, 81FEV6 Pre-dose, Week 8, n=81, 78FEV6 Pre-dose, Week 12, n=78, 71FEV6 Pre-dose, Week 18, n=67, 60FEV6 Pre-dose, Week 26, n=53, 52FEV6 Pre-dose, Week 39, n=28, 28FEV6 Pre-dose, Week 52, n=14, 11FEV6 post-dose, Week 2, n=89, 81FEV6 post-dose, Week 4, n=86, 80FEV6 post-dose, Week 8, n=80, 76FEV6 post-dose, Week 12, n=76, 69FEV6 post-dose, Week 18, n=66, 59FEV6 post-dose, Week 26, n=51, 51FEV6 post-dose, Week 39, n=27, 27FEV6 post-dose, Week 52, n=13, 10FVC, Pre-dose, Week 2, n =90, 83FVC, Pre-dose, Week 4, n =88, 82FVC, Pre-dose Week 8, n = 81, 79FVC, Pre-dose, Week 12, n =78, 71FVC, Pre-dose Week 18, n =67, 61FVC, Pre-dose Week 26, n=53, 52FVC, Pre-dose Week 39, n =28, 28FVC, Pre-dose Week 52, n =14, 11FVC, Post-dose Week 2, n =89, 82FVC, Post-dose Week 4, n =87, 81FVC, Post-dose Week 8, n =80, 78FVC,Post-dose Week 12, n =76, 69FVC, Post-dose Week 18, n =66, 60FVC, Post-dose Week 26, n=52, 51FVC, Post-dose Week 39, n =27, 27FVC, Post-dose Week 52, n =13, 10
Losmapimod 15 mg0.0280.0250.028-0.0140.0130.0200.0010.0160.0260.0190.023-0.020-0.0120.030-0.0310.0240.0450.0120.032-0.034-0.014-0.0030.0130.0710.0230.0100.012-0.029-0.0350.003-0.067-0.0170.0380.0060.011-0.058-0.021-0.028-0.0330.0310.0370.0330.019-0.008-0.0160.003-0.043-0.039
Placebo0.002-0.010-0.031-0.011-0.037-0.059-0.085-0.0340.012-0.022-0.010-0.008-0.035-0.070-0.086-0.018-0.007-0.034-0.043-0.036-0.073-0.076-0.102-0.101-0.003-0.027-0.039-0.028-0.060-0.081-0.095-0.119-0.018-0.039-0.061-0.046-0.093-0.095-0.115-0.052-0.007-0.021-0.052-0.020-0.075-0.135-0.092-0.081

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total, SGRQ Symptoms Score, SGRQ Activity Score and SGRQ Impact Score Over Time

SGRQ-C is a health related quality of life questionnaire consisting of 14 questions. SGRQ-C total score was calculated as 100 multiplied by summed weights from all positive items divided by sum of weights for all items in questionnaire. Components (Activity, Symptoms, Impacts) were calculated as 100 multiplied by summed weights from all positive items in that component divided by sum of weights for all items in that component. Score range for SGRQ-C total is 0-100. Maximum weights for Activity, Symptoms and Impacts component is 982.9, 566.2 and 1652.8 respectively. SGRQ-C was transformed to SGRQ for reporting. Higher scores indicate greater disease impact. Score at Day 1, pre-dose (Week 0) was considered as Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Only those par. with analyzable data at the given time points (represented by n=X, X in category titles) were included in analysis. (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 52

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
SGRQ Total, Week 12, (n=74, 71)SGRQ Total, Week 26, (n=50, 49)SGRQ Total, Week 39, (n=28, 28)SGRQ Total, Week 52, (n=14, 11)SGRQ Symptoms, Week 12, (n=78, 72)SGRQ Symptoms, Week 26, (n=52, 52)SGRQ Symptoms, Week 39, (n=28, 29)SGRQ Symptoms, Week 52, (n=14, 11)SGRQ Activity, Week 12, (n=77, 71)SGRQ Activity, Week 26, (n=50, 49)SGRQ Activity, Week 39, (n=28, 28)SGRQ Activity, Week 52, (n=14, 11)SGRQ Impact, Week 12, (n=75, 71)SGRQ Impact, Week 26, (n=52, 50)SGRQ Impact, Week 39, (n=28, 28)SGRQ Impact, Week 52, (n=14, 11)
Losmapimod 15 mg-1.42-1.31-3.19-3.43-4.08-4.30-8.21-11.671.150.70-1.002.59-2.22-2.19-2.80-3.31
Placebo-0.75-2.20-0.37-2.95-2.41-5.04-4.61-3.69-0.08-0.331.41-1.80-0.53-1.84-0.59-2.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at the Indicated Time Points

SBP and DBP were taken at Screening, Baseline (day 1, pre-dose) and post dose at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 39, 52 and at follow up (Week 53). Measurements were taken in a semi-recumbent position after 5 minutes rest. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value of an assessment is defined as the value at day 1, pre-dose. Par. were included in the analysis if they had at least one post-baseline measurement. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 53

,
InterventionMillimeter of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
SBP, Week 2, (n=90,84)SBP, Week 4, (n=89,82)SBP, Week 8, (n=81,80)SBP, Week 12, (n=78,72)SBP, Week 26, (n=53,53)SBP, Week 39, (n=28,29)SBP, Week 52, (n=14,11)SBP, Follow up, (n=83,68)DBP, Week 2, (n=90,84)DBP, Week 4, (n=89,82)DBP, Week 8, (n=81,80)DBP, Week 12, (n=78,72)DBP, Week 26, (n=53,53)DBP, Week 39, (n=28,29)DBP, Week 52, (n=14,11)DBP, Follow up, (n=83,68)
Losmapimod 15 mg-2.9-0.4-0.3-1.6-1.3-3.4-7.60.2-3.8-2.2-1.5-1.5-1.2-1.9-0.2-1.7
Placebo0.2-0.8-1.90.5-1.50.36.11.8-0.0-0.3-1.41.50.9-0.53.41.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

12-lead ECGs were obtained in triplicate at Screening then singly at Baseline (day 1, pre-dose) and post dose at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 39, 52 and at follow up (Week 53) using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate (HR) and measures PR, QRS, QT, and QT duration corrected for heart rate by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) or QT duration corrected for heart rate by Bazett's formula (QTcB) intervals. Change in ECG findings were categorized as normal and abnormal. Abnormal ECG values could be clinically significant (CS) or not clinically significant (NCS), as determined by the investigator. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Up to 53 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Normal-SCREENING, (n=94,90)Abnormal-NCS-SCREENING, (n=94,90)Abnormal-CS-SCREENING, (n=94,90)Normal-Baseline, (n=94,90)Abnormal-NCS-Baseline, (n=94,90)Abnormal-CS-Baseline, (n=94,90)Normal-Week 2, (n=90,84)Abnormal-NCS-Week 2, (n=90,84)Abnormal-CS-Week 2, (n=90,84)Normal-Week 4, (n=89,82)Abnormal-NCS-Week 4, (n=89,82)Abnormal-CS-Week 4, (n=89,82)Normal-Week 8, (n=80,80)Abnormal-NCS-Week 8, (n=80,80)Abnormal-CS-Week 8, (n=80,80)Normal-Week 12, (n=78,72)Abnormal-NCS-Week 12, (n=78,72)Abnormal-CS-Week 12, (n=78,72)Normal-Week 26, (n=53,52)Abnormal-NCS-Week 26, (n=53,52)Abnormal-CS-Week 26, (n=53,52)Normal-Week 39, (n=28,29)Abnormal-NCS-Week 39, (n=28,29)Abnormal-CS-Week 39, (n=28,29)Normal-Week 52, (n=14,11)Abnormal-NCS-Week 52, (n=14,11)Abnormal-CS-Week 52, (n=14,11)Normal-Follow up, (n=83,68)Abnormal-NCS-Follow up, (n=83,68)Abnormal-CS-Follow up, (n=83,68)
Losmapimod 15 mg51365543155229353272502824229135161208174042251
Placebo493994446440455454044235345294312111891112137406

[back to top]

Annual Rate of Moderate and Severe Exacerbations of COPD

An exacerbation of COPD, is defined as the worsening of 2 or more major symptoms (dyspnea, sputum volume, sputum purulence) or the worsening of any 1 major symptom together with any 1 of the minor symptoms (sore throat, cold, fever without other cause, increased cough and wheeze), for at least 2 consecutive days. Moderate-severe exacerbations were defined as use of antibiotics and/or oral steroids and/or hospitalization. Summary only included exacerbations for which a date of resolution or death was provided. Analysis was performed by using Bayesian inference assuming non-informative priors. The mean exacerbation rate was adjusted for treatment group, smoking status, ICS use and region. The adjusted posterior median was summarized per treatment group. The number of exacerbation events per participant was assumed to follow a negative binomial distribution. Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population comprised of all randomized par. who received at least one dose of study treatment. (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: From the start of the study treatment up to 53 Weeks

InterventionExacerbations per participant per year (Median)
Placebo0.84
Losmapimod 15 mg0.88

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Liver Events During the Treatment Period

Various liver chemistry parameters were monitored periodically to ensure the safety and tolerability of Losmapimod as compared to placebo. Study treatments were discontinued for par. if alanine aminotransferase (ALT) absolute >= 5xupper limit of normal (ULN) or; ALT >= 3xULN persists for >=4 Weeks or; ALT>=3x ULN and bilirubin >=2xULN or; ALT>=3x ULN and International normalized ratio (INR) >=1.5 or; ALT>=3x ULN and cannot be monitored weekly for 4 Weeks or; ALT>=3x ULN symptomatic. (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Up to Week 53

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo0
Losmapimod 15 mg0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Having Any Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment or all events of possible drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinaemia were categorized as SAE. AEs were considered as on-treatment If AE onset date is on or after treatment start date & on or before treatment stop date. par. having any AE or SAE were included in analysis. (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: From the start of the study treatment up to 53 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Non-serious AEsSAEs
Losmapimod 15 mg3819
Placebo348

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbation

The time to first moderate-severe COPD exacerbation in par. treated with losmapimod compared to placebo treated par. was evaluated. The time to the first on-treatment moderate-severe exacerbation was calculated as exacerbation onset date of first on-treatment exacerbation minus exposure start date plus 1. No statistical analysis was conducted. Data was summarized statistically only. (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: From the start of the study treatment up to 53 Weeks

InterventionDays (Mean)
Placebo168.01
Losmapimod 15 mg160.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Absolute White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Total Neutrophil, Total Lymphocyte, Basophil, Eosinophil, Monocyte and Platelet Count at the Indicated Time Point

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, 39, 52 (or at early withdrawal) and follow up (Week 53) to evaluate absolute WBC count, total neutrophil, total lymphocyte, basophil, absolute eosinophil, percentage eosinophil, monocyte and platelet count. Values obtained at Day 1, pre-dose (Week 0) were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated as laboratory test value obtained at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. If post-dose value was missing for a particular assessment visit, then no derivation were performed and the change from Baseline were set to missing for that visit. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 53

,
InterventionGiga cells per liter (G/L) (Mean)
Absolute WBC count, Week 2 (n=85,82)Absolute WBC count, Week 4 (n=86,80)Absolute WBC count, Week 8 (n=80,77)Absolute WBC count, Week 12 (n=76,70)Absolute WBC count, Week 18 (n=66,60)Absolute WBC count, Week 26 (n=52,50)Absolute WBC count, Week 39 (n=28,29)Absolute WBC count, Week 52 (n=14,11)Absolute WBC count, Follow up (n=79,67)Total neutrophils, Week 2 (n=85,82)Total neutrophils, Week 4 (n=86,80)Total neutrophils, Week 8 (n=80,77)Total neutrophils, Week 12 (n=76,70)Total neutrophils, Week 18 (n=66,60)Total neutrophils, Week 26 (n=52,50)Total neutrophils, Week 39 (n=28,29)Total neutrophils, Week 52 (n=14,11)Total neutrophils, Follow up (n=79,67)Total lymphocyte, Week 2 (n=85,82)Total lymphocyte, Week 4 (n=86,80)Total lymphocyte, Week 8 (n=80,77)Total lymphocyte, Week 12 (n=76,70)Total lymphocyte, Week 18 (n=66,60)Total lymphocyte, Week 26 (n=52,50)Total lymphocyte, Week 39 (n=28,29)Total lymphocyte, Week 52 (n=14,11)Total lymphocyte, Follow up (n=79,67)Basophils, Week 2 (n=85,82)Basophils, Week 4 (n=86,80)Basophils, Week 8 (n=80,77)Basophils, Week 12 (n=76,70)Basophils, Week 18 (n=66,60)Basophils, Week 26 (n=52,50)Basophils, Week 39 (n=28,29)Basophils, Week 52 (n=14,11)Basophils, Follow up (n=79,67)Eosinophil, Week 2 (n=85,82)Eosinophil, Week 4 (n=86,80)Eosinophil, Week 8 (n=80,77)Eosinophil, Week 12 (n=76,70)Eosinophil, Week 18 (n=66,60)Eosinophil, Week 26 (n=52,50)Eosinophil, Week 39 (n=28,29)Eosinophil, Week 52 (n=14,11)Eosinophil, Follow up (n=79,67)Monocytes, Week 2 (n=85,82)Monocytes, Week 4 (n=86,80)Monocytes, Week 8 (n=80,77)Monocytes, Week 12 (n=76,70)Monocytes, Week 18 (n=66,60)Monocytes, Week 26 (n=52,50)Monocytes, Week 39 (n=28,29)Monocytes, Week 52 (n=14,11)Monocytes, Follow up (n=79,67)Platelet count, Week 2 (n=85,82)Platelet count, Week 4 (n=87,80)Platelet count, Week 8 (n=79,77)Platelet count, Week 12 (n=75,70)Platelet count, Week 18 (n=66,59)Platelet count, Week 26 (n=52,50)Platelet count, Week 39 (n=28,29)Platelet count, Week 52 (n=14,11)Platelet count, Follow up (n=80,67)
Losmapimod 15 mg0.210.120.320.510.170.091.080.750.50-0.080-0.0120.0600.316-0.161-0.1900.6890.2480.3090.2820.1610.2630.2100.3210.2960.3870.4490.0900.002-0.0020.0030.000-0.002-0.006-0.005-0.000-0.0000.0250.0130.0140.0130.0460.0510.0280.0060.025-0.024-0.029-0.014-0.026-0.025-0.057-0.0200.0200.083-2.3-0.46.35.13.2-0.40.0-0.510.5
Placebo-0.040.030.04-0.070.29-0.070.290.860.73-0.038-0.014-0.0520.0230.189-0.0670.2401.0010.5550.0220.0430.089-0.0830.076-0.0420.019-0.1070.1000.000-0.001-0.0030.001-0.0020.001-0.001-0.006-0.0040.000-0.0020.008-0.0010.0300.0370.037-0.0010.011-0.0290.0020.001-0.007-0.0100.001-0.005-0.0340.071-3.3-6.4-2.2-10.05.3-2.7-3.4-13.69.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, 39, 52 (or at early withdrawal) and follow up (Week 53) to evaluate alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyl transferase at the indicated time point. Values obtained at Day 1, pre-dose (Week 0) were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated as laboratory test value obtained at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. If post-dose value was missing for a particular assessment visit, then no derivation were performed and the change from Baseline were set to missing for that visit. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 53

,
InterventionInternational units (IU)/ L (Mean)
Alanine aminotransferase, Week 2 (n=90,84)Alanine aminotransferase, Week 4 (n=88,81)Alanine aminotransferase, Week 8 (n=81,79)Alanine aminotransferase, Week 12 (n=78,72)Alanine aminotransferase, Week 18 (n=67,60)Alanine aminotransferase, Week 26 (n=53,50)Alanine aminotransferase, Week 39 (n=28,29)Alanine aminotransferase, Week 52 (n=14,11)Alanine aminotransferase, Follow up (n=80,68)Aspartate aminotransferase, Week 2 (n=90,84)Aspartate aminotransferase, Week 4 (n=88,80)Aspartate aminotransferase, Week 8 (n=81,79)Aspartate aminotransferase, Week 12 (n=78,72)Aspartate aminotransferase, Week 18 (n=67,60)Aspartate aminotransferase, Week 26 (n=53,49)Aspartate aminotransferase, Week 39 (n=28,29)Aspartate aminotransferase, Week 52 (n=14,11)Aspartate aminotransferase, Follow up (n=80,67)Alkaline phosphatase, Week 2 (n=90,84)Alkaline phosphatase, Week 4 (n=88,81)Alkaline phosphatase, Week 8 (n=81,79)Alkaline phosphatase, Week 12 (n=78,72)Alkaline phosphatase, Week 18 (n=67,60)Alkaline phosphatase, Week 26 (n=53,50)Alkaline phosphatase, Week 39 (n=28,29)Alkaline phosphatase, Week 52 (n=14,11)Alkaline phosphatase, Follow up (n=80,68)Gamma glutamyl transferase, Week 2 (n=90,84)Gamma glutamyl transferase, Week 4 (n=88,81)Gamma glutamyl transferase, Week 8 (n=81,79)Gamma glutamyl transferase, Week 12 (n=78,72)Gamma glutamyl transferase, Week 18 (n=67,60)Gamma glutamyl transferase, Week 26 (n=53,50)Gamma glutamyl transferase, Week 39 (n=28,29)Gamma glutamyl transferase, Week 52 (n=14,11)Gamma glutamyl transferase, Follow up (n=80,68)
Losmapimod 15 mg1.20.3-0.11.72.43.01.91.90.71.40.50.52.02.94.72.41.70.1-2.0-2.8-5.3-4.7-4.9-4.4-4.1-9.5-4.4-1.5-3.7-5.3-1.1-1.72.51.40.10.1
Placebo-0.31.8-0.31.30.3-0.23.0-1.10.7-0.52.0-0.42.20.90.31.3-1.10.30.30.0-2.5-2.91.00.20.90.1-4.2-0.31.4-1.8-0.10.6-1.8-1.7-0.5-2.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Spirometry Parameters in Pre and Post FEV1/FVC, Percent Predicted (PP) FEV1, PP FEV6 and PP FVC

Pre and post FEV1/FVC, PP FEV1, PP FEV6 and PP FVC were assessed at Screening, Day 1 pre-dose and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, 39 and 52. Par. were asked to withheld all bronchodilator therapy included ipratropiumn bromide and salbutamol/albuterol for at least 4 hours prior to the prebronchodilator spirometric test. Post-bronchodilator spirometric assessment was performed after inhalation of 400/360 µg of salbutamol/albuterol in 10-15 minutes. Day 1 (pre-dose) values were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. The maximum value of the 3 replicate assessments were used. Analysis performed using a mixed-effects repeated measures model. The adjusted mean values were summarized per treatment group. Par. were included in the analysis if they had at least one post-baseline measurement. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 52

,
InterventionPercentage (Mean)
PP FVC, Week 2, n =90, 82PP FVC, Week 4, n =88, 81PP FVC, Week 8, n =81, 78PP FVC, Week 12 , n =78, 70PP FVC, Week 18, n =67, 60PP FVC, Week 26, n =53, 51PP FVC, Week 39, n =28, 27PP FVC, Week 52, n =14, 11PP FEV1, Week 2, n =90, 82PP FEV1, Week 4, n =88, 81PP FEV1, Week 8, n =81, 78PP FEV1, Week 12 , n =78, 70PP FEV1, Week 18, n =67, 60PP FEV1, Week 26, n =53, 51PP FEV1, Week 39, n =28, 27PP FEV1, Week 52, n =14, 11PP FEV6, Week 2, n =87, 75PP FEV6, Week 4, n =84, 75PP FEV6, Week 8, n =79, 74PP FEV6, Week 12 , n =76, 67PP FEV6, Week 18, n =65, 56PP FEV6, Week 26, n =51, 48PP FEV6, Week 39, n =26, 24PP FEV6, Week 52, n =13, 11FEV1/FVC, Pre-dose, Week 2, n =90, 83FEV1/FVC, Pre-dose, Week 4, n =88, 82FEV1/FVC, Pre-dose Week 8, n = 81, 79FEV1/FVC, Pre-dose, Week 12, n =78, 71FEV1/FVC, Pre-dose Week 18, n =67, 61FEV1/FVC, Pre dose Week 26, n=53, 52FEV1/FVC, Pre-dose Week 39, n =28, 28FEV1/FVC, Pre-dose Week 52, n =14, 11FEV1/FVC, Post-dose Week 2, n =89, 82FEV1/FVC, Post-dose Week 4, n =87, 81FEV1/FVC, Post-dose Week 8, n =80, 78FEV1/FVC,Post-dose Week 12, n =76, 69FEV1/FVC, Post-dose Week 18, n =66, 60FEV1/FVC, Post-dose Week 26, n=52, 51FEV1/FVC, Post-dose Week 39, n =27, 27FEV1/FVC, Post-dose Week 52, n =13, 10
Losmapimod 15 mg1.311.720.47-0.781.121.881.240.922.031.521.040.120.581.260.792.033.452.152.04-0.021.871.842.093.660.430.430.460.020.340.840.701.260.51-0.230.28-0.97-0.233.230.181.51
Placebo0.72-0.73-2.05-0.64-1.58-2.81-2.06-1.240.28-0.24-1.14-0.10-0.79-2.07-2.33-0.320.63-0.72-1.71-0.42-1.47-1.69-2.100.990.220.300.100.310.11-0.48-1.36-0.180.09-0.900.12-0.51-0.65-0.60-1.270.34

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Chloride, Calcium, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium and Blood Urea Nitrogen at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, 39, 52 (or at early withdrawal) and follow up (Week 53) to evaluate calcium, chloride, glucose, potassium, sodium and blood urea nitrogenat the indicated time point. Values obtained at Day 1, pre-dose (Week 0) were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated as laboratory test value obtained at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. If post-dose value was missing for a particular assessment visit, then no derivation were performed and the change from Baseline were set to missing for that visit. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 53

,
InterventionMillimole (MMOL)/L (Mean)
Chloride, Week 2 (n=90,84)Chloride, Week 4 (n=88,81)Chloride, Week 8 (n=81,79)Chloride, Week 12 (n=77,72)Chloride, Week 18 (n=67,60)Chloride, Week 26 (n=53,50)Chloride, Week 39 (n=28,29)Chloride, Week 52 (n=14,11)Chloride, Follow up (n=80,68)Calcium, Week 2 (n=90,84)Calcium, Week 4 (n=88,80)Calcium, Week 8 (n=81,79)Calcium, Week 12 (n=78,72)Calcium, Week 18 (n=67,60)Calcium, Week 26 (n=53,49)Calcium, Week 39 (n=28,29)Calcium, Week 52 (n=14,11)Calcium, Follow up (n=80,67)Glucose, Week 2 (n=90,84)Glucose, Week 4 (n=88,81)Glucose, Week 8 (n=81,79)Glucose, Week 12 (n=78,72)Glucose, Week 18 (n=67,60)Glucose, Week 26 (n=53,50)Glucose, Week 39 (n=28,29)Glucose, Week 52 (n=14,11)Glucose, Follow up (n=80,68)Potassium, Week 2 (n=90,84)Potassium, Week 4 (n=88,80)Potassium, Week 8 (n=81,79)Potassium, Week 12 (n=77,72)Potassium, Week 18 (n=67,60)Potassium, Week 26 (n=53,49)Potassium, Week 39 (n=28,29)Potassium, Week 52 (n=14,11)Potassium, Follow up (n=80,67)Sodium, Week 2 (n=90,84)Sodium, Week 4 (n=88,81)Sodium, Week 8 (n=81,79)Sodium, Week 12 (n=77,72)Sodium, Week 18 (n=67,60)Sodium, Week 26 (n=53,50)Sodium, Week 39 (n=28,29)Sodium, Week 52 (n=14,11)Sodium, Follow up (n=80,68)Blood urea nitrogen, Week 2 (n=90,84)Blood urea nitrogen, Week 4 (n=88,81)Blood urea nitrogen, Week 8 (n=81,79)Blood urea nitrogen, Week 12 (n=78,72)Blood urea nitrogen, Week 18 (n=67,60)Blood urea nitrogen, Week 26 (n=53,50)Blood urea nitrogen, Week 39 (n=28,29)Blood urea nitrogen, Week 52 (n=14,11)Blood urea nitrogen, Follow up (n=80,68)
Losmapimod 15 mg0.51.10.70.20.30.50.1-1.4-0.5-0.042-0.31-0.039-0.029-0.033-0.023-0.032-0.061-0.0100.220.040.280.240.500.00-0.16-0.090.34-0.010.06-0.03-0.060.14-0.02-0.03-0.13-0.02-0.20.3-0.1-0.4-0.7-0.2-0.3-0.9-0.10.460.140.150.620.720.240.621.070.11
Placebo0.3-0.20.30.00.2-0.3-0.8-1.8-0.2-0.002-0.024-0.017-0.008-0.017-0.024-0.0170.002-0.018-0.13-0.010.01-0.080.22-0.08-0.110.310.200.020.010.050.020.020.020.130.100.010.1-0.10.0-0.10.10.1-0.4-0.6-0.2-0.04-0.21-0.11-0.12-0.41-0.34-0.260.010.07

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Eosinophil Percentage at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, 39, 52 (or at early withdrawal) and follow up (Week 53) to evaluate eosinophil percentage. Values obtained at Day 1, pre-dose (Week 0) were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated as laboratory test value obtained at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. If post-dose value was missing for a particular assessment visit, then no derivation were performed and the change from Baseline were set to missing for that visit. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 53

,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Eosinophil percentage, Week 2 (n=85,82)Eosinophil percentage, Week 4 (n=86,80)Eosinophil percentage, Week 8 (n=80,77)Eosinophil percentage, Week 12 (n=76,70)Eosinophil percentage, Week 18 (n=66,60)Eosinophil percentage, Week 26 (n=52,50)Eosinophil percentage, Week 39 (n=28,29)Eosinophil percentage, Week 52 (n=14,11)Eosinophil percentage, Follow up (n=79,67)
Losmapimod 15 mg0.300.160.110.080.600.580.210.050.29
Placebo0.090.030.140.080.300.580.39-0.11-0.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Frequency of Short Acting Beta-agonist or Anti-cholinergic Use

Use of short acting bronchodilators (short-acting beta2-agonists or short-acting anti-cholinergic) was allowed and was recorded in daily patient diary. It included inhaled short-acting beta2-agonists (e.g. Ipratropium bromide, salbutamol, Ipratropium/salbutamol (albuterol) combination product) and short-acting anti-cholinergics (e.g., ipratropium bromide3). Use of these medications was allowed throughout the study except 4 hours prior to and during each clinic visit. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 52

,
InterventionAverage number of puffs per 24 hours (Mean)
Week 4; n=85, 82Week 8; n=79, 79Week 12; n=76, 70Week 18; n=65, 61Week 26; n=51, 53Week 39; n=27, 27Week 52; n=14, 10
Losmapimod 15 mg-0.0400-0.14730.00220.14890.20980.3418-0.2881
Placebo-0.00290.11430.09040.31630.27250.71090.4368

[back to top]

Plasma Losmapimod Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to the End of Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau])

Pharmacokinetics (PK) of losmapimod was evaluated in participants with COPD using PK samples collected at pre-dose at Week 2 and Week 12. At Week 26, a sample was collected at pre-dose and a second sample was collected at 2 hours post-dose. Par. of mITT population that provided at least one observed concentration data in this study were considered for PK analysis. Drug plasma concentration-time data were modelled by nonlinear mixed effects modelling. AUC[0-tau] (tau=12 hours) was estimated from the model. (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Pre-dose at Weeks 2 and 12; pre-dose and at 2 hours post-dose at Week 26

Interventionhour (h)*nanogram (ng)/milliliter (mL) (Geometric Mean)
Losmapimod 15 mg668.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, 39, 52 (or at early withdrawal) and follow up (Week 53) to evaluate hematocrit. Values obtained at Day 1, pre-dose (Week 0) were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated as laboratory test value obtained at indicated time point minus Baseline value. If post-dose value was missing for a particular assessment visit, then no derivation were performed and the change from Baseline were set to missing for that visit. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 53

,
InterventionL (Mean)
Hematocrit, Week 2 (n=85,82)Hematocrit, Week 4 (n=87,80)Hematocrit, Week 8 (n=80,77)Hematocrit, Week 12 (n=76,70)Hematocrit, Week 18 (n=66,61)Hematocrit, Week 26 (n=52,50)Hematocrit, Week 39 (n=28,29)Hematocrit, Week 52 (n=14,11)Hematocrit, Follow up (n=80,67)
Losmapimod 15 mg-0.002-0.002-0.0060.000-0.000-0.0000.001-0.001-0.015
Placebo-0.001-0.002-0.0010.0020.0070.0030.0030.014-0.003

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin, Total Protein, Albumin and Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, 39, 52 (or at early withdrawal) and follow up (Week 53) to evaluate hemoglobin, total protein, albumin and MCHC. Values obtained at Day 1, pre-dose (Week 0) were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated as laboratory test value obtained at indicated time point minus Baseline value. If post-dose value was missing for a particular assessment visit, then no derivation were performed and the change from Baseline were set to missing for that visit. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 53

,
InterventionGram (G)/Liter (L) (Mean)
Hemoglobin, Week 2 (n=85,82)Hemoglobin, Week 4 (n=87,80)Hemoglobin, Week 8 (n=80,77)Hemoglobin, Week 12 (n=76,70)Hemoglobin, Week 18 (n=66,61)Hemoglobin, Week 26 (n=52,50)Hemoglobin, Week 39 (n=28,29)Hemoglobin, Week 52 (n=14,11)Hemoglobin, Follow up (n=80,67)Albumin, Week 2 (n=90,84)Albumin, Week 4 (n=88,81)Albumin, Week 8 (n=81,79)Albumin, Week 12 (n=78,72)Albumin, Week 18 (n=67,60)Albumin, Week 26 (n=53,50)Albumin, Week 39 (n=28,29)Albumin, Week 52 (n=14,11)Albumin, Follow up (n=80,68)Total protein, Week 2 (n=90,84)Total protein, Week 4 (n=88,81)Total protein, Week 8 (n=81,79)Total protein, Week 12 (n=78,72)Total protein, Week 18 (n=67,60)Total protein, Week 26 (n=53,50)Total protein, Week 39 (n=28,29)Total protein, Week 52 (n=14,11)Total protein, Follow up (n=80,68)MCHC, Week 2 (n=85,82)MCHC, Week 4 (n=87,80)MCHC, Week 8 (n=80,77)MCHC, Week 12 (n=76,70)MCHC, Week 18 (n=66,61)MCHC, Week 26 (n=52,50)MCHC, Week 39 (n=28,29)MCHC, Week 52 (n=14,11)MCHC, Follow up (n=80,67)
Losmapimod 15 mg0.0-1.0-2.5-1.4-2.3-2.9-0.1-1.8-4.5-0.6-0.3-1.2-0.8-1.1-1.1-1.2-1.5-1.6-1.6-1.2-2.0-0.8-1.5-1.5-2.2-3.0-2.01.7-0.6-0.9-3.3-4.8-5.3-1.5-3.30.6
Placebo-0.3-0.6-0.9-0.50.1-0.70.02.9-0.2-0.3-0.5-1.1-0.4-1.1-0.9-0.8-0.4-0.8-0.4-0.8-1.8-0.6-0.8-0.5-0.6-0.8-1.60.10.3-1.0-3.1-5.0-4.4-2.8-3.91.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, 39, 52 (or at early withdrawal) and follow up (Week 53) to evaluate mean corpuscle hemoglobin. Values obtained at Day 1, pre-dose (Week 0) were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated as laboratory test value obtained at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. If post-dose value was missing for a particular assessment visit, then no derivation were performed and the change from Baseline were set to missing for that visit. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 53

,
InterventionPicograms (Mean)
Mean corpuscle hemoglobin, Week 2 (n=85,82)Mean corpuscle hemoglobin, Week 4 (n=87,80)Mean corpuscle hemoglobin, Week 8 (n=80,77)Mean corpuscle hemoglobin, Week 12 (n=76,70)Mean corpuscle hemoglobin, Week 18 (n=66,61)Mean corpuscle hemoglobin, Week 26 (n=52,50)Mean corpuscle hemoglobin, Week 39 (n=28,29)Mean corpuscle hemoglobin, Week 52 (n=14,11)Mean corpuscle hemoglobin, Follow up (n=80,67)
Losmapimod 15 mg0.03-0.04-0.20-0.46-0.52-0.48-0.60-0.32-0.73
Placebo0.020.090.02-0.22-0.27-0.25-0.55-0.72-0.46

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, 39, 52 (or at early withdrawal) and follow up (Week 53) to evaluate mean corpuscle volume. Values obtained at Day 1, pre-dose (Week 0) were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated as laboratory test value obtained at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. If post-dose value was missing for a particular assessment visit, then no derivation were performed and the change from Baseline were set to missing for that visit. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 53

,
InterventionFemtoliters (Mean)
Mean corpuscle volume, Week 2 (n=85,82)Mean corpuscle volume, Week 4 (n=87,80)Mean corpuscle volume, Week 8 (n=80,77)Mean corpuscle volume, Week 12 (n=76,70)Mean corpuscle volume, Week 18 (n=66,61)Mean corpuscle volume, Week 26 (n=52,50)Mean corpuscle volume, Week 39 (n=28,29)Mean corpuscle volume, Week 52 (n=14,11)Mean corpuscle volume, Follow up (n=80,67)
Losmapimod 15 mg-0.40.1-0.4-0.4-0.10.2-1.40.0-2.4
Placebo0.00.10.20.30.60.5-1.0-1.4-1.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, 39, 52 (or at early withdrawal) and follow up (Week 53) to evaluate Red blood cell count. Values obtained at Day 1, pre-dose (Week 0) were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated as laboratory test value obtained at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. If post-dose value was missing for a particular assessment visit, then no derivation were performed and the change from Baseline were set to missing for that visit. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 53

,
InterventionTrillion cells per liter (TI/L) (Mean)
Red blood cell count, Week 2 (n=85,82)Red blood cell count, Week 4 (n=87,80)Red blood cell count, Week 8 (n=80,77)Red blood cell count, Week 12 (n=76,70)Red blood cell count, Week 18 (n=66,61)Red blood cell count, Week 26 (n=52,50)Red blood cell count, Week 39 (n=28,29)Red blood cell count, Week 52 (n=14,11)Red blood cell count, Follow up (n=80,67)
Losmapimod 15 mg-0.00-0.02-0.050.020.00-0.020.090.01-0.04
Placebo-0.01-0.03-0.030.020.040.010.080.230.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Uric Acid and Creatinine at the Indicated Time Point

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, 39, 52 (or at early withdrawal) and follow up (Week 53) to evaluate total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, urice acid and creatinine. Values obtained at Day 1, pre-dose (Week 0) were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated as laboratory test value obtained at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. If post-dose value was missing for a particular assessment visit, then no derivation were performed and the change from Baseline were set to missing for that visit. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 53

,
InterventionMicromole (UMOL)/ L (Mean)
Total bilirubin, Week 2 (n=90,84)Total bilirubin, Week 4 (n=88,81)Total bilirubin, Week 8 (n=81,79)Total bilirubin, Week 12 (n=78,72)Total bilirubin, Week 18 (n=67,60)Total bilirubin, Week 26 (n=53,50)Total bilirubin, Week 39 (n=28,29)Total bilirubin, Week 52 (n=14,11)Total bilirubin, Follow up (n=80,68)Direct bilirubin, Week 2 (n=90,84)Direct bilirubin, Week 4 (n=88,81)Direct bilirubin, Week 8 (n=81,79)Direct bilirubin, Week 12 (n=78,72)Direct bilirubin, Week 18 (n=67,60)Direct bilirubin, Week 26 (n=53,50)Direct bilirubin, Week 39 (n=28,29)Direct bilirubin, Week 52 (n=14,11)Direct bilirubin, Follow up (n=80,68)Uric acid, Week 2 (n=90,83)Uric acid, Week 4 (n=88,80)Uric acid, Week 8 (n=81,78)Uric acid, Week 12 (n=78,71)Uric acid, Week 18 (n=67,60)Uric acid, Week 26 (n=53,50)Uric acid, Week 39 (n=28,29)Uric acid, Week 52 (n=14,11)Uric acid, Follow up (n=80,67)Creatinine, Week 2 (n=90,84)Creatinine, Week 4 (n=88,81)Creatinine, Week 8 (n=81,79)Creatinine, Week 12 (n=78,72)Creatinine, Week 18 (n=67,60)Creatinine, Week 26 (n=53,50)Creatinine, Week 39 (n=28,29)Creatinine, Week 52 (n=14,11)Creatinine, Follow up (n=80,68)
Losmapimod 15 mg0.2-0.1-0.7-0.10.2-0.50.20.9-0.40.20.0-0.10.30.20.00.10.10.0-7.0-14.0-12.1-10.2-5.9-3.716.68.31.73.221.782.233.465.321.305.640.330.23
Placebo-0.50.2-0.4-0.20.00.0-0.01.10.2-0.10.1-0.00.10.1-0.1-0.1-0.10.11.7-3.82.17.56.70.613.77.9-2.60.200.040.53-0.110.411.612.162.940.62

[back to top]

Plasma Losmapimod Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Lowest Concentration (Ctrough) at Steady State

Pharmacokinetics of losmapimod was evaluated in participants with COPD using PK samples collected at pre-dose at Week 2 and Week 12. At Week 26, a sample was collected at pre-dose and a second sample was collected at 2 hours post-dose. Par. of mITT population that provided at least one observed concentration data in this study were considered for PK analysis (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Drug plasma concentration-time data were modelled by nonlinear mixed effects modelling to develop a Population PK model. Cmax and Ctrough were estimated from the PK model. (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Pre-dose at Weeks 2 and 12; pre-dose and at 2 hours post-dose at Week 26

Interventionng/ mL (Geometric Mean)
CmaxCtrough
Losmapimod 15 mg49.723.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate (HR) Values at the Indicated Time Points

HR was assessed at Screening, Baseline (day 1, pre-dose) and post dose at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 39, 52 and at follow up (Week 53). Measurements were taken in a semi-recumbent position after 5 minutes rest. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value of an assessment is defined as the value at day 1, pre-dose. Par. were included in the analysis if they had at least one post-baseline measurement. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02299375)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 53

,
InterventionBeats per minute (bpm) (Mean)
HR, Week 2, (n=90,84)HR, Week 4, (n=89,82)HR, Week 8, (n=81,80)HR, Week 12, (n=78,72)HR, Week 26, (n=53,53)HR, Week 39, (n=28,29)HR, Week 52, (n=14,11)HR, Follow up, (n=83,68)
Losmapimod 15 mg1.50.61.62.21.84.41.34.2
Placebo1.21.41.03.34.13.34.33.6

[back to top]

Mean Annual On-treatment Moderate and/or Severe COPD Exacerbations up to Week 24

The mean annual moderate and severe COPD exacerbations during the treatment (trt) period (per participant [par.] per year) was assessed. The event rate for exacerbations was calculated as the number of events x 1000 divided by the total participant exposure during the time-period of interest. An exacerbation of COPD, is defined as the worsening of two or more major symptoms (dyspnea, sputum volume, sputum purulence [color]) for at least two consecutive days; or the worsening of any one major symptom together with any one of the minor symptoms (sore throat, cold, fever without other cause, increased cough, increased wheeze) for at least two consecutive days. Analysis performed using a generalised linear model assuming a negative binomial distribution and covariates of treatment group, exacerbation history (0, 1, >=2 moderate/severe), smoking status (screening), geographical region and post-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 (day 1). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

InterventionExacerbations per participant per year (Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.22
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.34

[back to top]

Mean Annual On-treatment Moderate and/or Severe COPD Exacerbations up to Week 52

The mean annual moderate and severe COPD exacerbations during the treatment (trt) period (per participant [par.] per year) was assessed. The event rate for exacerbations was calculated as the number of events x 1000 divided by the total participant exposure during the time-period of interest. An exacerbation of COPD, is defined as the worsening of two or more major symptoms (dyspnea, sputum volume, sputum purulence [color]) for at least two consecutive days; or the worsening of any one major symptom together with any one of the minor symptoms (sore throat, cold, fever without other cause, increased cough, increased wheeze) for at least two consecutive days. Analysis performed using a generalised linear model assuming a negative binomial distribution and covariates of treatment group, exacerbation history (0, 1, >=2 moderate/severe), smoking status (screening), geographical region and post-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 (day 1). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionExacerbations per participant per year (Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.20
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.36

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an On-treatment Penumonia Event in the Extension Part of the Study

All suspected pneumonias required confirmation as defined by the presence of new infiltrate(s) on chest x-ray AND at least 2 of the following signs and symptoms: Increased cough, Increased sputum purulence (colour) or production, Auscultatory findings of adventitious sounds , Dyspnea or tachypnea, Fever (oral temperature > 37.5 °C), Elevated WBC (>10,000/mm3 or >15 percent immature forms) orr Hypoxemia (HbO2 saturation <88 percent or at least 2 percent lower than Baseline value). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Number)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg4
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an On-treatment Penumonia Event in the Treatment Period

All suspected pneumonias required confirmation as defined by the presence of new infiltrate(s) on chest x-ray and at least 2 of the following signs and symptoms: Increased cough, Increased sputum purulence (colour) or production, Auscultatory findings of adventitious sounds , Dyspnea or tachypnea, Fever (oral temperature > 37.5 °C), Elevated white blood cells (WBC) (>10,000/millimeter [mm^3] or >15 percent immature forms) or Hypoxemia (hemoglobin/oxygen [HbO2] saturation <88 percent or at least 2 percent lower than Baseline value). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Number)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg20
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Finding at Week 24

The 24-hour holter measurements were obtained at Screening and 24 hours prior to Week 24 (Visits 1 and 6). The number of participants with clinically significant change (abnormal) were reported. Holter Monitoring Population: all participants in the ITT Population who had at least one holter monitoring evaluation. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Overall Study Arm180
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg165

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least One On-treatment Bone Fracture Incident in the Extension Part of the Study

To evaluate the potential for bone systemic corticosteroid effects, the incidence of bone fractures was assessed. It was categorized as an adverse event of special interest. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Number)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least One On-treatment Bone Fracture Incident in the Treatment Period

To evaluate the potential for bone systemic corticosteroid effects, the incidence of bone fractures was assessed. It was categorized as an adverse event of special interest. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Number)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg4
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg6

[back to top]

Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score Expressed as Least Square Mean at Week 24

The TDI measures change in the participant's dyspnoea from Baseline. The scores in both indexes depend on ratings for three different categories: functional impairment; magnitude of task; and magnitude of effort. Each of these scales had a possible score ranging from -6 (major deterioration) to +6 (major improvement). TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the three individual scores and then divided by 2 (so the range of the TDI focal score is -9 to +9). TDI was measured at Week 4 and Week 24. Analysis performed using a repeated measures model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, BDI focal score, BDI focal score by visit and treatment by visit interactions. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg2.29
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg1.72

[back to top]

Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score Expressed as Least Square Mean at Week 52

The TDI measures change in the participant's dyspnoea from Baseline. The scores in both indexes depend on ratings for three different categories: functional impairment; magnitude of task; and magnitude of effort. Each of these scales had a possible score ranging from -6 (major deterioration) to +6 (major improvement). TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the three individual scores and then divided by 2 (so the range of the TDI focal score is -9 to +9). TDI was measured at Weeks 4, 24 and 52. Analysis performed using a repeated measures model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, BDI focal score, BDI focal score by visit and treatment by visit interactions (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg1.74
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg1.39

[back to top]

Assessment of Respiratory Symptoms by Change From Baseline in 4-weekly Mean Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT)-RS Scores up to Week 24

The EXACT-PRO is a 14 item instrument designed to capture information on the occurrence, frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations of disease in participants with COPD. EXACT-RS consists of 11 items from the 14 item EXACT-PRO instrument and has a scoring range of 0-40. Three subscales are used to describe different symptoms; dyspnoea (range 0-17), cough and sputum (range 0-11) and chest symptoms (range 0-12). Baseline was defined as the mean value during the period between Visits 1 and 2. Mean scores were calculated for each four weekly period and change from Baseline was calculated as four weekly score minus the Baseline value. Four weekly intervals were analyzed using a MMRM method with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, time period, baseline, baseline by time period and treatment by time period interactions. Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1-4, n=870,859Week 5-8, n=851,830Week 9-12, n=841,813Week 13-16, n=831,802Week 17-20, n=828,788Week 21-24, n=825,783Breathlessness score, Week 1-4, n=870,859Breathlessness score, Week 5-8, n=851,830Breathlessness score, Week 9-12, n=841,813Breathlessness score, Week 13-16, n=831, 802Breathlessness score, Week 17-20, n=828,788Breathlessness score, Week 21-24, n=825,783Cough, sputum score, Week 1-4, n=870,859Cough, sputum score, Week 5-8, n=851,830Cough, sputum score, Week 9-12, n=841,813Cough, sputum score, Week 13-16, n=831,802Cough, sputum score, Week 17-20, n=828,788Cough, sputum score, Week 21-24, n=825,783Chest score, Week 1-4, n=870,859Chest score, Week 5-8, n=851,830Chest score, Week 9-12, n=841,813Chest score, Week 13-16, n=831,802Chest score, Week 17-20, n=828,788Chest score, Week 21-24, n=825,783
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.50-0.77-1.05-1.09-1.02-0.96-0.20-0.26-0.34-0.36-0.31-0.30-0.24-0.39-0.50-0.53-0.53-0.50-0.06-0.12-0.20-0.20-0.17-0.17
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-1.45-2.00-2.23-2.42-2.43-2.31-0.71-0.95-1.03-1.11-1.10-1.07-0.41-0.59-0.67-0.74-0.77-0.72-0.33-0.46-0.54-0.58-0.57-0.53

[back to top]

Assessment of Respiratory Symptoms by Change From Baseline in 4-weekly Mean EXACT-RS Scores up to Week 52

The EXACT-PRO is a 14 item instrument designed to capture information on the occurrence, frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations of disease in participants with COPD. EXACT-RS consists of 11 items from the 14 item EXACT-PRO instrument and has a scoring range of 0-40. Three subscales are used to describe different symptoms; dyspnoea (range 0-17), cough and sputum (range 0-11) and chest symptoms (range 0-12). Baseline was defined as the mean value during the period between Visits 1 and 2. Mean scores were calculated for each four weekly period and change from Baseline was calculated as four weekly score minus the Baseline value. Four weekly intervals were analyzed using a MMRM method with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, time period, baseline, baseline by time period and treatment by time period interactions. Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1-4, n=205, 213Week 5-8, n=203, 208Week 9-12, n=201, 206Week 13-16, n=201, 204Week 17-20, n=201, 199Week 21-24, n=202, 197Week 25-28, n=194, 186Week 29-32, n=192, 181Week 33-36, n=187, 180Week 37-40, n=185, 177Week 41-44, n=180, 174Week 45-48, n=180, 173EXACT-RS Scores, Week 49-52, n=179, 171Breathlessness scores, Week 1-4, n=205, 213Breathlessness scores, Week 5-8, n=203, 208Breathlessness scores, Week 9-12, n=201, 206Breathlessness scores, Week 13-16, n=201, 204Breathlessness scores, Week 17-20, n=201, 199Breathlessness scores, Week 21-24, n=202, 197Breathlessness scores, Week 25-28, n=194, 186Breathlessness scores, Week 29-32, n=192, 181Breathlessness scores, Week 33-36, n=187, 180Breathlessness scores, Week 37-40, n=185, 177Breathlessness scores, Week 41-44, n=180, 174Breathlessness scores, Week 45-48, n=180, 173Breathlessness scores, Week 49-52, n=179, 171Cough and sputum scores, Week 1-4, n=205, 213Cough and sputum scores, Week 5-8, n=203, 208Cough and sputum scores, Week 9-12, n=201, 206Cough and sputum scores, Week 13-16, n=201, 204Cough and sputum scores, Week 17-20, n=201, 199Cough and sputum scores, Week 21-24, n=202, 197Cough and sputum scores, Week 25-28, n=194, 186Cough and sputum scores, Week 29-32, n=192, 181Cough and sputum scores, Week 33-36, n=187, 180Cough and sputum scores, Week 37-40, n=185, 177Cough and sputum scores, Week 41-44, n=180, 174Cough and sputum scores, Week 45-48, n=180, 173Cough and sputum scores, Week 49-52, n=179, 171Chest scores, Week 1-4, n=205, 213Chest scores, Week 5-8, n=203, 208Chest scores, Week 9-12, n=201, 206Chest scores, Week 13-16, n=201, 204Chest scores, Week 17-20, n=201, 199Chest scores, Week 21-24, n=202, 197Chest scores, Week 25-28, n=194, 186Chest scores, Week 29-32, n=192, 181Chest scores, Week 33-36, n=187, 180Chest scores, Week 37-40, n=185, 177Chest scores, Week 41-44, n=180, 174Chest scores, Week 45-48, n=180, 173Chest scores, Week 49-52, n=179, 171
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.72-0.90-1.21-1.52-1.53-1.52-1.16-0.90-0.62-1.11-0.81-0.64-0.61-0.31-0.32-0.44-0.57-0.50-0.50-0.38-0.26-0.14-0.37-0.24-0.11-0.08-0.32-0.44-0.52-0.62-0.73-0.71-0.57-0.48-0.40-0.54-0.41-0.39-0.44-0.09-0.13-0.24-0.31-0.29-0.30-0.21-0.16-0.08-0.20-0.16-0.13-0.08
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-1.24-1.97-2.18-2.53-2.64-2.63-2.48-2.33-2.12-2.34-2.30-2.17-2.03-0.64-0.93-1.05-1.19-1.17-1.13-1.14-1.11-1.08-1.13-1.06-0.97-0.96-0.34-0.59-0.63-0.73-0.83-0.83-0.73-0.68-0.56-0.65-0.66-0.66-0.61-0.27-0.46-0.51-0.61-0.67-0.68-0.63-0.55-0.48-0.57-0.58-0.57-0.49

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Week 52

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hemoglobin at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
Interventiong/L (Mean)
Week 52, n=174,170Maximum post BL, n=206,212
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-2.51.9
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-2.52.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in QTcF and PR Interval at Week 52

Single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4, Week 24 and Week 52 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in ECG QTcF and PR interval was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
InterventionMsec (Least Squares Mean)
QTcF, n=181,169PR, n=174,160
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg2.41.4
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg1.41.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (BP) at Week 24

Vital signs were obtained at the Screening Visit and prior to taking the morning dose of study treatment and prior to conducting spirometry at Week 4 and Week 24 or at the Study Treatment Discontinuation Visit. A single set of blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) measurements were collected taken after the participant had rested for 5 minutes in the sitting position. Change from Baseline values for systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) at Week 24 were summarised and these data were analyzed using MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the values from most recent assessment prior to randomization which records both systolic and diastolic BP (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
InterventionMillimeter of mercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean)
SBPDBP
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-1.1-0.5
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-1.0-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (BP) at Week 52

Vital signs were obtained at the Screening Visit and prior to taking the morning dose of study treatment and prior to conducting spirometry at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 52 or at the Study Treatment Discontinuation Visit. A single set of blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) measurements were taken after the participant had rested for 5 minutes in the sitting position. Change from Baseline values for systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) at Week 52 were summarised and these data were analyzed using MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the values from most recent assessment prior to randomization which records both systolic and diastolic BP (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
SBPDBP
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.30.4
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-1.3-0.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting an Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI) of Oropharyngeal Origin in the Treatment Period

Oropharyngeal examinations for clinical evidence of infection (e.g., Candida albicans) were performed at each clinic visit. All suspected cases of candidiasis were reported as AEs. The number of participants with oral candidiasis, Candida infection, oral fungal infection, and oropharyngeal candidiasis were reported. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Oral candidiasisCandida infectionOral fungal infectionOropharyngeal candidiasis
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg4430
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg2122

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE) in the Treatment Period

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. These included an exacerbation of a chronic or intermittent pre-existing condition. A SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; or all events of possible drug-induced liver injury. Abnormal and clinically significant laboratory test results were also recorded as an AE or SAE. COPD exacerbations were an expected disease-related outcome and were not to be recorded as an AE, unless they met the definition of an SAE. Participants were not to be withdrawn from the study due to COPD exacerbations and their evaluation was an efficacy endpoint. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEAny SAE
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg33951
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg35449

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any On-treatment AE/SAEs in the Extension Part of the Study

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. These included an exacerbation of a chronic or intermittent pre-existing condition. A SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; or all events of possible drug-induced liver injury. Abnormal and clinically significant laboratory test results were also recorded as an AE or SAE. COPD exacerbations were an expected disease-related outcome and were not to be recorded as an AE, unless they met the definition of an SAE. Participants were not to be withdrawn from the study due to COPD exacerbations and their evaluation was an efficacy endpoint. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEAny SAE
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg12228
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg10021

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Cardiovascular (CV) Events (Including Supraventricular Arrhythmia and Non Fatal Myocardial Infarction) in the Treatment Period

Cardiovascular safety was monitored via AE reporting with categorization and analysis of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) including cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac failure, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and central nervous system hemorrhages and cerebrovascular conditions. In addition, ECGs and vital signs were measured in all subjects and24-hour Holter monitoring was performed in a predefined subset. Pre-specified MACE analysis was conducted based on adjudicated CV deaths and investigator-reported non-fatal AEs. Number of participants with any of the following MACE events were to be included per the broad and narrow analyses: Broad MACE criteria (ischemic heart disease standardized MedDRA query [SMQ; myocardial infarction SMQ and other ischemic diseases]) and narrow MACE criteria (myocardial infarction [acute myocardial infarction]. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any MACE, Narrow definitionAny MACE, Broad definition
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg711
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg412

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any On-treatment CV Events (Including Supraventricular Arrhythmia and Non Fatal Myocardial Infarction) in the Extension Part of the Study

Cardiovascular safety was monitored via AE reporting with categorization and analysis of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) including cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac failure, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and central nervous system hemorrhages and cerebrovascular conditions. In addition, ECGs and vital signs were measured in all subjects and24-hour Holter monitoring was performed in a predefined subset. Pre-specified MACE analysis was conducted based on adjudicated CV deaths and investigator-reported non-fatal AEs. Number of participants with any of the following MACE events were to be included per the broad and narrow analyses: Broad MACE criteria (ischemic heart disease standardized MedDRA query [SMQ; myocardial infarction SMQ and other ischemic diseases]) and narrow MACE criteria (myocardial infarction [acute myocardial infarction] (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any MACE, Narrow definitionAny MACE, Broad definition
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg25
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg57

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glucose, Calcium, Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, and Urea at Week 24

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of Glucose, calcium, CO2, chloride, phophate, potassium, sodium, and urea at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
InterventionMillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
Week 24, Calcium, n=835,785Maximum post BL, Calcium, n=887,866Week 24, Chloride, n=838,787Maximum post BL, Chloride, n=888,866Week 24, CO2, n=835,785Maximum post BL, CO2, n=835,785Week 24, Glucose, n=839,787Maximum post BL, Glucose, n=887,866Week 24, Potassium, n=834,785Maximum post BL, Potassium, n=887,866Week 24, Phosphate, n=839,787Maximum post BL, Phosphate, n=888,866Week 24, Sodium, n=837,787Maximum post BL, Sodium, n=888,866Week 24, Urea, n=839,787Maximum post BL, Urea, n=888,866
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.0140.012-0.70.6-0.00.5-0.000.37-0.030.13-0.0290.043-0.20.70.040.64
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.0160.013-0.40.9-0.60.00.120.530.040.18-0.0280.039-0.30.60.080.68

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting an AESI of Oropharyngeal Origin in the Extension Part of the Study

Oropharyngeal examinations for clinical evidence of infection (e.g., Candida albicans) were performed at each clinic visit. All suspected cases of candidiasis were reported as AEs. The number of participants with oral candidiasis, candida infection, oral fungal infection, and oropharyngeal candidiasis were reported. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Candida infectionOral fungal infection
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg32
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Gamma Glutamyl Aminotransferase (GGT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), and Creatine Kinase at Week 24

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of ALP, ALT, AST, CK, and GGT at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
InterventionInternational units per liter (IU/L) (Mean)
Week 24, ALT, n=838,785Maximum post BL, ALT, n=887,864Week 24, AST, n=835,785Maximum post BL, AST, n=887,866Week 24, ALP, n=839,787Maximum post BL, ALP, n=888,866Week 24, GGT, n=839,787Maximum post BL, GGT, n=888,866Week 24, Creatine Kinase, n=839,787Maximum post BL, Creatine Kinase, n=888,866
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg3.85.54.05.6-2.80.80.54.7-3.420.6
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg1.43.01.13.21.14.33.47.5-3.920.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 24

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 at Week 24 was defined as the FEV1 values obtained prior to morning dose of the study treatment. Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose (0 minutes) on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the pre-dose measurement at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. ITT Population comprised of all randomized subjects excluding those who were randomized in error. Only participants with analyzable data at the given time point were analyzed. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

InterventionLiters (L) (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.142
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.029

[back to top]

Daily Activity Question Percentage of Days Reporting a Score of 2 up to Week 24

Participants were asked to complete the daily activity question as part of the eDiary, which included the following options: 0: fewer activities, 1: no affect on my activities, and 2: more activities than usual. Daily activity question percentage of days with score of 2 over Weeks 1-24 was analysed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region and baseline. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI (100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg)0.0
Budesonide/Formoterol (400 mcg/12 mcg)-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Correction (QTcF) and PR Interval at Week 24

A single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4 and Week 24 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in ECG QTcF and PR interval was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
InterventionMilliseconds (msec) (Least Squares Mean)
QTcF, n=840,787PR, n=812,766
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.60.5
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg2.5-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Week 24

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hemoglobin at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
InterventionGrams per liter (g/L) (Mean)
Week 24, n=822,769Maximum post BL, n=880,857
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-1.01.5
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.91.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Week 52

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematocrit (proportion of red blood cells in blood) at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as Most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
InterventionFraction of 1 (Mean)
Week 52, n=174,170Maximum post BL, n=206,212
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.00560.0149
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.00560.0153

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Week 24

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematocrit (proportion of red blood cells in blood) at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
InterventionFraction of 1 (Mean)
Week 24, n=822,769Maximum post BL, n=880,857
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.00240.0123
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.00240.0115

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glucose, Calcium, CO2, Chloride, Magnesium, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, and Urea at Week 52

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of Glucose, calcium, CO2, chloride, magnesium, phophate, potassium, sodium, and urea at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
InterventionMmol/L (Mean)
Week 52, Calcium, n=180,174Maximum post BL,Calcium, n=207,214Week 52, Chloride, n=181,174Maximum post BL,Chloride, n=207,214Week 52, CO2, n=180,174Maximum post BL,CO2, n=207,214Week 52, Glucose, n=181,174Maximum post BL,Glucose, n=207,214Week 52, Potassium, n=180,174Maximum post BL,Potassium, n=207,214Week 52, Phosphate, n=181,174Maximum post BL,Phosphate, n=207,214Week 52, Sodium, n=181,174Maximum post BL,Sodium, n=207,214Week 52, Urea, n=181,174Maximum post BL, Urea, n=207,214
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.0400.008-0.21.3-1.00.30.220.63-0.100.200.0050.110-0.11.10.121.08
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.0330.026-0.11.4-1.2-0.20.310.92-0.020.29-0.0030.109-0.21.10.161.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes at Week 52

Hematology laboratory assessments included erythrocytes and was measured at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-dose value at Week 52. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
Intervention10^12 cells/L (Mean)
Week 52, n=174,170Maximum post BL, n=206,212
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.000.07
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.020.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes at Week 24

Hematology laboratory assessments included erythrocytes and was measured at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-dose value at Week 24. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
Intervention10^12 cells/L (Mean)
Week 24, n=822,769Maximum post BL, n=880,857
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.040.04
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.020.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Urate at Week 52

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of bilirubin, creatinine, and urate at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 of the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
Week 52, Bilirubin, n=181,174Maximum post BL, Bilirubin, n=207,214Week 52, Creatinine, n=181,174Maximum post BL, Creatinine, n=207,214Week 52, Urate, n=181,174Maximum post BL, Urate, n=207,214
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.12.31.286.003.940.0
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.32.02.956.993.642.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Urate at Week 24

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of bilirubin, creatinine, and urate at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
Week 24, Bilirubin, n=839,786Maximum post BL, Bilirubin, n=888,865Week 24, Creatinine, n=839,787Maximum post BL, Creatinine, n=888,866Week 24, Urate, n=839,787Maximum post BL, Urate, n=888,866
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.11.21.143.991.721.9
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.21.11.054.122.823.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, and Platelets at Week 52

Hematology laboratory assessments included Basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes,neutrophils, total neutrophil, leukocytes, and platelets; parameters were measured at Baseline (BL), Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-dose value at Week 52. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
Intervention10^9 cells/L (Mean)
Week 52, Basophils, n=168,166Maximum post BL, Basophils, n=205,212Week 52, Eosinophils, n=168,166Maximum post BL, Eosinophils, n=205,212Week 52, Monocytes, n=168,166Maximum post BL, Monocytes, n=205,212Week 52, Neutrophils, n=168,166Maximum post BL, Neutrophils, n=205,212Week 52, Leukocytes, n=168,166Maximum post BL, Leukocytes, n=205,212Week 52, Platelets, n=170,166Maximum post BL, Platelets, n=203,210Week 52, Lymphocytes, n=168,166Maximum post BL, Lymphocytes, n=202,212
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.0030.010-0.0110.0570.0280.072-0.1630.835-0.170.87-2.713.9-0.0270.295
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.0020.0110.0020.0740.0250.0750.2460.9230.330.97-1.813.60.0600.325

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, and Platelets at Week 24

Hematology laboratory assessments included basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, total neutrophil, leukocytes, and platelets; parameters were measured at Baseline (BL), Week 12 and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-dose value at Week 24. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a repeat test). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
Intervention10^9 cells/Liter(L) (Mean)
Week 24, Basophils, n=817,761Maximum post BL, Basophils, n=876,853Week 24, Eosinophils, n=817, 761Maxmium post BL, Eosinophils, n=876,853Category title 5. Week 24, Monocytes, n=817,761Maximum post BL, Monocytes, n=876,853Week 24, Neutrophils, n=817,761Maximum post BL, Neutrophils, n=876,853Week 24, Leukocytes, n=819,761Maximum post BL, Leukocytes, n=877,853Week 24, Platelets, n=810,759Maximum post BL, Platelets, n=871,846Week 24, Lymphocytes, n=817,761Maximum post BL, Lymphocytes, n=876,853
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.0010.005-0.0150.0190.0040.0480.1420.6490.110.64-0.710.2-0.0230.150
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.0010.005-0.0080.034-0.0060.0400.0710.4810.060.52-0.710.80.0020.187

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in ALT, AST, GGT, ALP, and Creatine Kinase at Week 52

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of ALP, ALT, AST, CK, and GGT at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24 and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
InterventionInternational units per liter (IU/L) (Mean)
Week 52, ALT, n=181,173Maximum post BL, ALT, n=207,212Week 52, AST, n=180,174Maximum post BL, AST, n=207,214Week 52, ALP, n=181,174Maximum post BL, ALP, n=207,214Week 52, GGT, n=181,174Maximum post BL, GGT, n=207,214Week 52, Creatine Kinase, n=181,174Maximum post BL, Creatine Kinase, n=207,214
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg1.34.50.83.7-2.71.20.28.916.746.9
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg1.75.41.75.51.76.70.27.76.139.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Albumin and Protein at Week 52

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of albumin and protein at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
Interventiong/L (Mean)
Week 52, Albumin, n=181,174Maximum post BL,Albumin, n=207,214Week 52, Protein, n=181,174Maximum post BL, Protein, n=207,214
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.70.2-1.60.0
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.80.4-1.10.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 52

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 at Week 52 was defined as the FEV1 values obtained prior to morning dose of the study treatment. Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose (0 minutes) on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the pre-dose measurement at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. Extension Population: all participants in the ITT Population who were enrolled into the subset of participants with extension to 52 weeks. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionLiters (L) (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.126
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.053

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Albumin and Protein at Week 24

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of albumin and protein at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24. Change from Baseline (BL) was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). The maximum post BL values have been presented. Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
Interventiong/L (Mean)
Week 24, Albumin, n=839,787Maximum post BL, Albumin, n=888,866Week 24, Protein, n=839,787Maximum post BL, Protein, n=888,866
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.50.2-1.00.1
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.70.1-0.60.4

[back to top]

Daily Activity Question Percentage of Days Reporting a Score of 2 up to Week 52

Participants were asked to complete the daily activity question as aprt of the eDiary, which included the following options: 0: fewer activities, 1: no affect on my activities, and 2: more activities than usual. Daily activity question percentage of days with score of 2 over Weeks 1-24 was analysed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region and baseline. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionPercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.0
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 24

A single 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4 and Week 24 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in ECG heart rate was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionBeats per minute (Bpm) (Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-1.1
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-1.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 52

A single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4, Week 24 and Week 52 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in ECG heart rate was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionBpm (Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.2
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 24

Pulse rate was obtained at the Screening Visit and prior to taking the morning dose of study treatment and prior to conducting spirometry at Week 4 and Week 24 or at the Study Treatment Discontinuation. Pulse rate was measured in a sitting position after the participant was kept at rest for at least 5 minutes. Change from Baseline values for pulse rate at Week 24 were summarised and these data were analyzed using MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the values from most recent assessment prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionBpm (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.5
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 52

Pulse rate was obtained at the Screening Visit and prior to taking the morning dose of study treatment and prior to conducting spirometry at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 52 or at the Study Treatment Discontinuation. Pulse rate was measured in a sitting position after the participant was kept at rest for at least 5 minutes. Change from Baseline values for pulse rate at Week 52 were summarized and these data were analyzed using MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the values from most recent assessment prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionBpm (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.7
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-1.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate According to Bazett's Formula (QTcB) at Week 24

A single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4 and Week 24 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in QTcB was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionMsec (Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg1.5
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in QTcB at Week 52

A single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4, Week 24, and Week 52 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in QTcB was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 52. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionMsec (Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.9
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg2.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD; SGRQ) Total Score for COPD Participants at Week 24

The SGRQ-C is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure the impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on a COPD participant's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SGRQ-C total score was converted to SGRQ total score (ranging from 0-100) according to manual. In addition to an overall summary (total) score, scores for the individual domains of Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts (each ranging from 0-100) are produced. A decrease in score indicated improvement in quality of life. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for this instrument is a 4-point improvement (decrease from Baseline). Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as total score at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. The analysis for SGRQ total score was performed using a MMRM method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-6.6
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-4.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire-COPD; SGRQ Total Score for COPD Participants at Week 52

The SGRQ-C is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure the impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on a COPD participant's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SGRQ-C total score was converted to SGRQ total score (ranging from 0-100) according to manual. In addition to an overall summary (total) score, scores for the individual domains of Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts (each ranging from 0-100) are produced. A decrease in score indicated improvement in quality of life. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for this instrument is a 4-point improvement (decrease from Baseline). Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as total score at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. The analysis for SGRQ total score was performed using a MMRM method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-4.6
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-1.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Area Under The Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) for Different Time Spans Post Dosing at Week 12

The standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) is assessed for different time spans (0-12h, 0-24h, 12-24h) within the overall serial measurement post dosing at week 12 of treatment. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the average of the -45 minutes and -15 minutes FEV1 values taken on Day 1. (NCT02371629)
Timeframe: Baseline, 0-12 hour, 0-24 hour , 12-24 hour post dose at Week 12

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
AUC (0-12 hour)AUC (0-24 hour)AUC (12-24 hour)
NVA237 Once Daily0.1060.043-0.019
NVA237 Twice Daily0.1360.0850.035

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12

Spirometry testing was performed in accordance with American Thoracic Society standards. Trough FEV1 defined as the mean of two measurements at 23 hours 15 minutes and 23 hour 45 minutes post dosing. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the average of the -45 minutes and -15 minutes FEV1 values taken on Day 1. An analysis-of-covariance (ANCOVA) for repeated measurements, also known as mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM), was performed for the change from baseline of trough FEV1 at Week 12. The model included treatment, COPD severity, baseline smoking status, baseline ICS use, region, and visit (Day 1, and Weeks 12 and 26) as factors and baseline FEV1 as a covariate. (NCT02371629)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
NVA237 Twice Daily0.092
NVA237 Once Daily0.059

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Area Under The Curve (AUC 0-12 Hour) for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Post Dosing at Day 1

The standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) is assessed for 0-12 hour, post dosing at Day 1 of treatment. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the average of the -45 minutes and -15 minutes FEV1 values taken on Day 1. (NCT02371629)
Timeframe: Baseline, 0-12 hour post dose at Day 1

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
NVA237 Twice Daily0.143
NVA237 Once Daily0.139

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With a Clinically Significant Improvement in St George Respiratory Questionnaire at Week 12 and Week 26

"The health status, as reported by the patients, is assessed using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).~The SGRQ contains 50 items divided into 2 parts covering 3 aspects of health related to COPD:~Part I covers Symptoms and is concerned with respiratory symptoms, their frequency and severity~Part II covers Activity and is concerned with activities that caused or are limited by breathlessness~Part II is also concerned with Impacts, which covers a range of aspects concerned with social functioning and psychological disturbances resulting from airways disease.~A score was calculated for each of these three subscales and the total score was calculated. In each case, the lowest possible value was 0 and the highest 100.~A clinically significant improvement is defined as ≥ 4 unit improvement from baseline score (a decrease of ≥ 4)." (NCT02371629)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks, 26 Weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Change from Baseline to WK 12Change from Baseline to WK 26
NVA237 Once Daily46.949.6
NVA237 Twice Daily54.559.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With a Clinically Important Improvement on Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at Week 12 and Week 26

"Breathlessness at Week 12 and Week 26 is measured using the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI). On day 1, breathlessness is assessed by the Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI). Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI)/Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score is based on three domains: functional impairment, magnitude of task and magnitude of effort and captures changes from baseline. BDI was measured at day 1 prior to the first dose with domain scores ranging from 0=very severe to 4=no impairment and a total score ranging from 0 to 12(best). TDI captures changes from baseline. Each domain is scored from -3=major deterioration to 3=major improvement to give an overall TDI focal score of -9 to 9. Higher numbers indicate a better score.~Clinically important improvement indicates ≥ 1 unit in the TDI focal score at Weeks 12 and 26 in comparison to BDI focal score (an increase of ≥ 1)." (NCT02371629)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks, 26 Weeks

,
InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Change from Baseline to WK 12Change from Baseline to WK 26
NVA237 Once Daily52.054.6
NVA237 Twice Daily56.961.1

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death

This endpoint reports patients affected by any adverse events (AE), serious adverse events (SAE) and death. Only treatment emergent AE, SAE, deaths are reported for this endpoint. (NCT02371629)
Timeframe: 26 Weeks

,
InterventionCount of Participants (Number)
Patients with at least one AEPatients with at least one SAEDeath
NVA237 Once Daily224301
NVA237 Twice Daily203331

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Day 1 and Week 26

Spirometry testing was performed in accordance with American Thoracic Society standards. Trough FEV1 defined as the mean of two measurements at 23 hours 15 minutes and 23 hour 45 minutes post dosing. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the average of the -45 minutes and -15 minutes FEV1 values taken on Day 1. An analysis-of-covariance (ANCOVA) for repeated measurements, also known as mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM), was performed for the change from baseline of trough FEV1. The model included treatment, COPD severity, baseline smoking status, baseline ICS use, region, and visit (Day 1, and Weeks 12 and 26) as factors and baseline FEV1 as a covariate. (NCT02371629)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, Week 26

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Change from baseline to Day 1Change from baseline to Week 26
NVA237 Once Daily0.0700.056
NVA237 Twice Daily0.1190.104

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days With no Rescue Medication Use Over the 26 Weeks

Patients report the number of puffs of rescue medication (salbutamol / albuterol) using an electronic diary. change from baseline in percentage of days without rescue medication usage over 26 weeks was analyzed. (NCT02371629)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
NVA237 Twice Daily16.574
NVA237 Once Daily15.363

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at Week 12 and Week 26

Breathlessness at Week 12 and Week 26 is measured using the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI). On day 1, breathlessness is assessed by the Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI). Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI)/Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score is based on three domains: functional impairment, magnitude of task and magnitude of effort and captures changes from baseline. BDI was measured at day 1 prior to the first dose with domain scores ranging from 0=very severe to 4=no impairment and a total score ranging from 0 to 12(best). TDI captures changes from baseline. Each domain is scored from -3=major deterioration to 3=major improvement to give an overall TDI focal score of -9 to 9. Higher numbers indicate a better score. (NCT02371629)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks, 26 Weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to WK 12Change from Baseline to WK 26
NVA237 Once Daily0.8491.170
NVA237 Twice Daily1.3461.523

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Score at Week 12 and Week 26

"The health status, as reported by the patients, is assessed using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The SGRQ contains 50 items divided into 2 parts covering 3 aspects of health related to COPD:~Part I covers Symptoms and is concerned with respiratory symptoms, their frequency and severity~Part II covers Activity and is concerned with activities that caused or are limited by breathlessness~Part II is also concerned with Impacts, which covers a range of aspects concerned with social functioning and psychological disturbances resulting from airways disease.~A score was calculated for each of these three subscales and the total score was calculated. In each case, the lowest possible value was 0 and the highest 100. Higher values corresponded to greater impairment of health status." (NCT02371629)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks, 26 Weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to WK 12Change from Baseline to WK 26
NVA237 Once Daily-3.563-4.644
NVA237 Twice Daily-5.320-6.587

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Daily COPD Symptom Score at Week 26

Patients reported symptoms by using an electronic diary. The mean daily total symptom score, the mean morning symptom score and the mean evening symptom score were calculated for each patient over 26 weeks. Each symptom measured in a numeric rating scale of 0-10; 0 indicates no symptom and 10 indicates severe symptom. 0 is no waking due to symptoms, 1 woke up once, 2 woke up more than once due to symptoms ; 10 was the worst score.The daily score for an individual symptom score was the worst of the morning and evening scores on a particular day. If either the morning or evening score was missing for a symptom then the non-missing value was taken as the worst. A negative change indicates improvement. Only the scores for the 6 COPD symptoms (respiratory symptoms, cough, wheeze, production of sputum, sputum color, and breathlessness) were used to derive the total symptom score (NCT02371629)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 Weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change in mean dailyChange in mean morningChange in mean evening
NVA237 Once Daily-1.107-0.828-1.056
NVA237 Twice Daily-1.336-1.032-1.205

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Inspiratory Capacity (IC) at Individual Timepoints at Week 26

Mixed model for repeated measures was used to analyze change from baseline in IC. (NCT02371629)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 (Day 183-184)

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 183/-20 minDay 183/25 minDay 183/1 h 55 minDay 183/3 h 55 minDay 183/7 h 55 minDay 183/11 h 55 minDay 184/23 h 40 min
NVA237 Once Daily0.0540.1730.1710.1590.1100.0300.062
NVA237 Twice Daily0.0940.1810.1930.1630.1080.0420.045

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Individual Timepoints at Week 26

Mixed model for repeated measures was used to analyze change from baseline in FVC. Baseline FVC is defined as the average of the -45 min and -15 min FVC values taken on Day 1 prior to first dose. (NCT02371629)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 (Day 183-184)

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 183/-45 min:Day 183/-15 min:Day 183/5 min:Day 183/15 min:Day 183/30 min:Day 183/1 h:Day 183/2 hDay 183/3 h:Day 183/4 h:Day 183/6 hDay 183/8 hDay 183/10 hDay 183/12 hDay 183/13 hDay 184/16 hDay 184/22 hDay 184/23 h 15 minDay 184/23 h 45 min
NVA237 Once Daily0.0250.0290.0850.1320.1440.1540.2000.1860.1690.1160.0850.0390.0260.004-0.081-0.0760.0310.077
NVA237 Twice Daily0.0790.1020.1590.1770.1940.1900.2290.2290.2160.1460.1370.0710.0410.096-0.014-0.0360.0750.129

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Individual Timepoints at Week 26

Mixed model for repeated measures was used to analyze change from baseline in FEV1. Baseline FEV1 is defined as the average of the -45 min and -15 min FEV1 values taken on Day 1 prior to first dose. (NCT02371629)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 (Day 183-184)

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 183/-45 minDay 183/-15 minDay 183/5 minDay 183/15 minDay 183/30 minDay 183/1 hDay 183/2 hDay 183/3 hDay 183/4 hDay 183/6 hDay 183/8 hDay 183/10 hDay 183/12 hDay 183/13 hDay 184/16 hDay 184/22 hDay 184/23 h 15 minDay 184/23 h 45 min
NVA237 Once Daily0.0120.0340.0700.1060.1220.1320.1630.1540.1320.0800.0640.0380.0240.000-0.063-0.0430.0320.067
NVA237 Twice Daily0.0580.0860.1110.1450.1550.1580.1940.1790.1660.1100.1180.0670.0560.093-0.001-0.0120.0760.122

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Area Under The Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) for Different Time Spans Post Dosing at Week 26

The standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) is assessed for different time spans (0-12h, 0-24h, 12-24h) within the overall serial measurement post dosing at week 26 of treatment. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the average of the -45 minutes and -15 minutes FEV1 values taken on Day 1. (NCT02371629)
Timeframe: Baseline, 0-12 hour, 0-24 hour , 12-24 hour post dose at Week 26

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
AUC (0-12 hour)AUC (0-24 hour)AUC (12-24 hour)
NVA237 Once Daily0.0910.030-0.028
NVA237 Twice Daily0.1230.0760.032

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24: ITT Population

The ACQ-5 has 5 questions, reflecting the top-scoring five asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze. Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to each of the five symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). ACQ-5 total score was mean of the scores of all 5 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 24Change at Week 24
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w2.761.33-1.43
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w2.771.37-1.38
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w2.711.67-1.06
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w2.771.58-1.19

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

The ACQ-7 has 7 questions, the first 5 questions assess the most common asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze plus short-acting bronchodilator use, and FEV1 (pre-bronchodilator % predicted). Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to each of the five symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). Clinic staff scored the FEV1% predicted on a 7-point scale. The questions were equally weighted and the ACQ-7 total score was mean of the scores of all 7 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w-0.79-0.94-1.11-1.17-1.25-1.32-1.32
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-0.82-0.97-1.12-1.20-1.22-1.35-1.34
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w-0.46-0.65-0.81-0.85-0.89-1.04-0.91
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w-0.50-0.65-0.90-0.92-1.01-1.05-1.07

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ [S]) Self-Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT Population

The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to participants with asthma. The AQLQ comprises of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item is scored on a 7-point likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire are averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 24Change at Week 24
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w4.315.461.13
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w4.285.471.17
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w4.265.230.95
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w4.305.301.02

[back to top]

Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil <0.3 Giga/L

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for >=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionExacerbation per participant-year (Number)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w0.675
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.512
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w0.732
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.610

[back to top]

Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for >=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionExacerbation per participant-year (Number)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w0.871
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.456
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w0.970
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.524

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by EuroQol Group in order to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. EQ-5D consists of EQ-5D descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state. EQ-5D-5L-VAS records participant's self-rated health on a vertical VAS that allows them to indicate their health state that can range from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable). (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Single Index: Change at Week 12Single Index: Change at Week 24Single Index: Change at Week 36Single Index: Change at Week 52VAS Score: Change at Week 12VAS Score: Change at Week 24VAS Score: Change at Week 36VAS Score: Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.090.090.090.1011.1011.4411.6112.98
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.090.080.090.109.809.2111.4111.90
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w0.070.070.080.077.698.339.708.35
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w0.080.080.100.086.398.599.319.52

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

Evening asthma symptom score was determined using PM (post meridiem) symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the day. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0=very well, no asthma symptoms, 1=one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness, 2=more than one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness without interference of normal activities, 3=wheezing, cough, or breathlessness most of the day, which interfered to some extent with normal activities, 4=asthma very bad, unable to carry out daily activities as usual. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w-0.17-0.27-0.41-0.45-0.52-0.56-0.57
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-0.16-0.29-0.40-0.46-0.52-0.56-0.61
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w-0.05-0.11-0.24-0.26-0.33-0.39-0.41
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w-0.06-0.14-0.22-0.30-0.36-0.39-0.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

FVC is a standard pulmonary function test used to quantify respiratory muscle weakness. FVC is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after full inspiration in the upright position, measured in liters. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

,,,
Interventionliter (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.230.260.280.290.290.300.29
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.250.270.290.290.290.310.31
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w0.080.120.130.130.110.110.08
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w0.100.120.180.180.180.190.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

The HADS is a general scale to detect states of anxiety and depression already used and validated in asthma, which includes HADS-A and HADS-D subscales. The instrument is comprised of 14 items: 7 related to anxiety (HADS-A) and 7 to depression (HADS-D). Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3. The anxiety/depression score is the sum of the scores of the 7 related items; one can score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. And the total score is the sum of the scores of the 14 items ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 42 (severe symptoms), with higher scores indicating higher anxiety/depression complains. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w-1.91-1.93-2.02-2.36
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-1.98-1.88-2.13-2.17
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w-2.11-2.17-2.52-2.00
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w-1.55-1.73-2.67-1.86

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

The PEF is a participant's maximum speed of expiration, as measured with a peak flow meter. Peak flow testing for PEF was performed at home (morning and evening) while sitting or standing prior to using any medication (if needed) for asthma. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

,,,
Interventionliters/min (Mean)
AM: Change at Week 2AM: Change at Week 4AM: Change at Week 8AM: Change at Week 12AM: Change at Week 24AM: Change at Week 36AM: Change at Week 52PM: Change at Week 2PM: Change at Week 4PM: Change at Week 8PM: Change at Week 12PM: Change at Week 24PM: Change at Week 36PM: Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w15.2121.8125.7027.8128.7131.1929.8613.8017.9421.0619.7519.9521.7918.77
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w14.4619.6723.1825.8823.7423.9326.6711.3514.9017.2618.7015.8214.3515.58
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w4.196.237.429.855.553.242.853.335.012.823.24-4.89-6.75-6.43
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w3.455.5512.2214.2315.4312.5710.993.872.737.688.527.562.642.83

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

Morning asthma symptom score was determined using AM (ante meridiem) symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the night. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0= No asthma symptoms, slept through the night, 1= Slept well, but some complaints in the morning, no night time awakenings, 2= Woke up once because of asthma (including early awakening), 3= Woke up several times because of asthma (including early awakening), 4= Bad night, awake most of the night because of asthma. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w-0.18-0.26-0.40-0.45-0.52-0.54-0.55
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-0.15-0.27-0.37-0.44-0.50-0.56-0.60
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w-0.07-0.16-0.26-0.30-0.35-0.38-0.41
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w-0.09-0.16-0.25-0.30-0.36-0.38-0.41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

Participants recorded every morning on awakening the number of asthma-related nocturnal awakenings requiring use of rescue medication that occurred during the previous night. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

,,,
Interventionnumber of nocturnal awakenings/night (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w-0.15-0.19-0.29-0.33-0.36-0.34-0.35
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-0.11-0.20-0.24-0.28-0.30-0.36-0.41
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w-0.06-0.10-0.18-0.21-0.23-0.25-0.24
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w-0.04-0.11-0.17-0.18-0.26-0.26-0.26

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

Participants might administered salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol as reliever medication as needed during the study. The number of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol inhalations were recorded daily by the participants in an electronic diary/peak expiratory flow (PEF) meter. In the case that Nebulizer solutions were used as an alternative delivery method, the nebulizer dose was converted to number of puffs as per following conversion factor: salbutamol/albuterol nebulizer solution (2.5 mg) corresponds to 4 puffs. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

,,,
InterventionNumber of puffs of reliever medication (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w-0.56-0.68-1.02-1.23-1.27-1.30-1.45
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-0.47-0.73-0.94-1.08-1.15-1.23-1.39
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w-0.21-0.26-0.50-0.52-0.77-0.99-0.90
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w-0.10-0.34-0.65-0.89-0.99-1.06-1.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

,,,
Interventionpercent predicted of FEV1 (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w7.107.929.279.229.9810.1210.08
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w8.449.209.7010.2810.1410.9411.02
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w2.584.554.935.024.385.094.25
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w3.324.136.085.906.416.826.68

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

,,,
Interventionliter (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.100.100.120.120.130.120.12
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.090.100.110.110.100.110.11
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w-0.07-0.02-0.02-0.02-0.05-0.03-0.08
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w-0.04-0.040.030.01-0.010.01-0.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic Rhinitis

RQLQ(S)+12 is a self-administered questionnaire with standardized activities developed to measure health-related quality of life signs and symptoms that are most problematic in those 12 to 75 years of age, as a result of perennial or seasonal allergic rhinitis. There are 28 items on RQLQ(S) in 7 domains: activities (3 items), sleep (3 items), non-nose/eye symptoms (7 items), practical problems (3 items), nasal symptoms (4 items), eye symptoms (4 items) and emotional (4 items). RQLQ(S)+12 responses are based on 7-point likert scale with responses ranging from 0 (not troubled) to 6 (extremely troubled). Individual items within RQLQ(S)+12 are equally weighted. The overall score is calculated as the mean score of all items. Higher scores indicated more health-related quality of life impairment (lower scores better). (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w-0.70-0.73-0.78-0.90
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-0.64-0.60-0.75-0.76
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w-0.50-0.50-0.56-0.41
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w-0.44-0.54-0.58-0.47

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

FEF is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. FEF25-75% is defined as the mean forced expiratory flow between the 25% and 75% of the FVC. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

,,,
Interventionliters/sec (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.220.240.290.300.340.350.36
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.270.290.320.350.350.360.36
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w0.090.160.180.180.170.180.16
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w0.110.150.200.190.220.220.24

[back to top]

Time to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population

The time to first LOAC event was defined as follows: date of the first event - first dose date +1. For participants who had no event on or before last dose date + 14 days or last contact date, the time was censored at the last dose date + 14 days or the last contact date, whichever was earlier. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52

Interventiondays (Median)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w110.0
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w230.0
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w102.0
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w264.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic Rhinosinusitis

The SNOT-22 is a validated measure of health related quality of life in sinonasal disease. It is a 22 item questionnaire with each item assigned a score ranging from 0-5. The total score may range from 0 (no disease) -110 (worst disease), lower scores represent better health related quality of life. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w-13.55-14.68-15.23-15.78
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-16.07-17.41-18.86-19.81
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w-6.82-7.21-6.10-6.95
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w-11.30-9.55-8.51-9.98

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w8.47
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w17.99
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w13.22
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w23.41

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w13.40
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w26.41
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w13.05
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w30.58

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/L

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w11.43
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w22.04
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w13.49
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w24.04

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w10.16
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w18.74
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w11.87
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w20.89

[back to top]

Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events Resulting in Hospitalization or Emergency Room Visit During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for >=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations (resulted hospitalization or emergency room visit) that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionExacerbation per participant-year (Number)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w0.081
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.043
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w0.034
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.025

[back to top]

Annualized Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) Event During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population

LOAC was defined as any of the following: >=6 additional reliever puffs of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol in a 24-hour period (compared to baseline) on 2 consecutive days; increase in ICS >=4 times the dose at randomization; use of systemic corticosteroids for >=3 days; hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of LOAC that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionLOAC per participant-year (Number)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w2.972
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w1.853
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w2.965
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w1.740

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionliter (Mean)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w0.14
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.27
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w0.20
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.32

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil <0.3 Giga/L

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionliter (Mean)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w0.12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.21
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w0.17
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.21

[back to top]

Time to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population

The time to first severe exacerbation was defined as follows: date of the first event - randomization date +1. For participants who had no event on or before Visit 18 (Week 52) or last contact date, the time was censored at the date of Visit 18 or the last contact date, whichever was earlier. The median time to first severe exacerbation was not estimated; therefore, the probability of severe exacerbation at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52, are presented as the descriptive statistics. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52

,,,
Interventionprobability of severe exacerbation (Number)
Probability at Week 12Probability at Week 24Probability at Week 36Probability at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.0940.1770.2350.295
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.1370.2110.2680.325
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w0.1650.2750.3640.434
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w0.1930.2970.3760.437

[back to top]

Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for >=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionExacerbation per participant-year (Number)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w1.040
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.560
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w1.038
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.639

[back to top]

Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for >=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionExacerbation per participant-year (Number)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w1.081
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.370
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w1.236
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.403

[back to top]

Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/L

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for >=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionExacerbation per participant-year (Number)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w1.007
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.445
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w1.081
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.434

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/L

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,
Interventionliter (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w1.810.34
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w1.790.35
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w1.770.17
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w1.750.21

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,
Interventionliter (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w1.810.39
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w1.750.43
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w1.780.19
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w1.730.20

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52

,,,
Interventionliter (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w0.220.240.280.310.310.31
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.250.270.290.300.320.32
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w0.080.130.150.130.140.12
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w0.100.130.190.190.210.20

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,
Interventionliter (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Change at Week 12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w1.782.070.28
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w1.782.090.31
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w1.761.920.15
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w1.751.930.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT Population

The ACQ-5 has 5 questions, reflecting the top-scoring five asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze. Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to each of the five symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). ACQ-5 total score was mean of the scores of all 5 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 36Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w-0.88-1.07-1.26-1.33-1.50-1.50
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-0.89-1.06-1.24-1.35-1.52-1.50
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w-0.52-0.76-0.94-0.98-1.21-1.07
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w-0.58-0.77-1.05-1.09-1.22-1.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self- Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L

The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to participants with asthma. The AQLQ comprises of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item is scored on a 7-point likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire are averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 24
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w4.241.39
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w4.361.30
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w4.240.97
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w4.211.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self-Administered Global Score at Weeks 12, 36, and 52: ITT Population

The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to participants with asthma. The AQLQ comprises of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item is scored on a 7-point likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire are averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 36, and 52

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 12Change at Week 36Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w1.091.261.28
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w1.091.331.34
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w0.901.051.00
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w0.941.081.02

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT02414854)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w14.3216.1118.8119.7619.9219.96
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w17.3818.7719.8520.7522.0821.57
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w5.789.6110.279.4210.578.37
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w6.608.6712.2412.8613.4512.89

[back to top]

Etiology of Preterm Delivery

Reason for each subject's preterm delivery was classified as either preterm labor or delivery for maternal indications (eg pre-eclampsia). (NCT02447250)
Timeframe: within one week of entering study

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
preterm labor, responsive to albuterolmaternal indicated delivery, responsive to albuter
Single Arm: Varied Albuterol Dose Response46

[back to top]

Maternal BMI at Time of Pregnancy and Likelihood of Positive Response to Albuterol

Maternal BMI will be obtained from her medial record, and she will be asked about weight gain during pregnancy at time of enrollment. Results will be compared for infants born to women with a normal BMI vs. those with obese BMI (>30). (NCT02447250)
Timeframe: Maternal information collected at enrollment; albuterol response assessed within one week

Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
mean BMI mothers of albuterol-responders , any dosmean BMI mothers of albuterol non-responders
Single Arm: Varied Albuterol Dose Response27.427.3

[back to top]

Birth Weight of Albuterol Responders vs Non Responders

birth weight in grams of each subject was recorded at time of enrollment (NCT02447250)
Timeframe: within one week of entering study

Interventiongrams (Mean)
albuterol respondersalbuterol non responders
Single Arm: Varied Albuterol Dose Response847.21147.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Positive Response at Different Albuterol Doses

Compare number of subjects who have a positive response (greater than or equal to 10% decrease in respiratory resistance) to each dose of albuterol (NCT02447250)
Timeframe: Data collected 15 minutes after dose in each session. Study includes 3 sessions within a 7 day period.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
positive Rrs response at 180 mcg albuterolpositive Rrs response at 270 mcg albuterolpositive Rrs response at 360 mcg albuterol
Single Arm: Varied Albuterol Dose Response644

[back to top]

Association of Smoke Exposure During Pregnancy and Neonatal Response to Albuterol

Mothers who smoked cigarettes during pregnancy and the rate of albuterol response of their infants (NCT02447250)
Timeframe: Smoking and second hand smoke exposure history will be obtained at enrollment. Albuterol response will be obtained within one week.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
albuterol responders of mothers who smokedalbuterol responders of non-smoker mothers %
Single Arm: Varied Albuterol Dose Response46

[back to top]

Gestational Age at Birth

Average gestational age (GA) in weeks at birth for subjects who responded to albuterol versus subjects without a positive response (NCT02447250)
Timeframe: within one week of entering study

Interventionweeks (Mean)
birth GA albuterol responders, weeksbirth GA albuterol non responders
Single Arm: Varied Albuterol Dose Response26.728.5

[back to top]

Change in Respiratory Resistance

The primary outcome is the percentage of subjects who show a positive response to each dose of albuterol. A positive response is defined as a greater than or equal to 10% decrease in respiratory resistance (Rrs). The change in RRs was measured at baseline and again after each dose of albuterol. All measurements were taken within a 7 day time frame for each subject such that each subject would have up to 3 results measured during a 7 day period, if he/she were able to complete three sets of PFTs according to study protocol. The change in Rrs was calculated by subtracting the baseline Rrs from the post-albuterol Rrs. (NCT02447250)
Timeframe: Within one week of performing pulmonary function tests

Interventioncm h2o/mL/sec (Mean)
dose 1dose 2dose 3
Single Arm: Varied Albuterol Dose Response0.0110.0060.014

[back to top]

Family History of Asthma and Likelihood to Respond to Albuterol

Family history was obtained from verbal history by subject's mother at time of enrollment in study. A positive family history was noted if a first degree relative of the subject (infant) had a diagnosis of asthma. (NCT02447250)
Timeframe: History collected at enrollment, albuterol response assessed within one week

Interventionparticipants (Number)
family hx of asthma, respond to albuterolno fam hx asthma, respond to albuterol
Single Arm: Varied Albuterol Dose Response19

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Pre-specified Local Application Site Reactions

Pre-specified local application site reactions, irrespective of causality, included AEs related to lip swelling/edema, mouth swelling/edema, palatal swelling/edema, swollen tongue/edema, oropharyngeal swelling/edema, pharyngeal edema/throat tightness, oral pruritus, throat irritation, tongue pruritus, and ear pruritus. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: Up to 35 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Short Ragween Pollen Allergen Extract64.52
Placebo26.92

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Anaphylaxis and/or Systemic Allergic Reactions

For the purposes of this study, systemic allergic reactions are allergic reactions that occur away from the site of study drug application (allergic reactions other than local application site reactions). Anaphylaxis is a severe allergic reaction that typically involves more than one body system. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: Up to 35 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Short Ragweed Pollen Allergen Extract0.58
Placebo0.20

[back to top]

Average TCS During the Entire RS

TCS is DSS plus DMS, assessed here during the entire RS. This starts from the first day of 3 consecutive days with ragweed pollen counts ≥10 grains/m^3 through the last day of the last occurrence of 3 consecutive days with ragweed pollen counts ≥10 grains/m^3. The duration of the entire RS is up to 13 weeks; this duration varies by site/region. The RC DSS assesses 6 allergy symptoms measured on a scale of 0 to 3 (score range: 0-18). A lower DSS indicates less RC symptoms. The RC DMS is based on use of RC rescue medications (loratadine, olopatadine, mometasone) with different scores/dose unit (score range: 0-20). A lower DMS indicates less RC medication use. The sum of RC DSS+DMS ranges from 0 to 38, with a lower score indicating less RC symptoms and medication use. Components contributing to the TCS for the entire RS are collected in an e-diary completed by the participant/parent/guardian. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: Up to 13 weeks

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Short Ragweed Pollen Allergen Extract3.88
Placebo5.75

[back to top]

Average Rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) DSS During the Peak RS

The DSS consists of a total of 6 rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms: 4 rhinitis symptoms (runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing, itchy nose) and 2 conjunctivitis symptoms (itchy eyes, watery eyes). The components that contribute to the DSS endpoint are collected in an e-diary completed by the participant/parent/guardian. The RC DSS is measured on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 as follows: 0 (no sign/symptom evident) to 3 (sign/symptom that is hard to tolerate; may cause interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping). The maximum DSS is 18 points if a participant experiences all 6 symptoms with an intensity of 3 for each symptom. The minimum DSS is 0 points if a participant experiences no symptoms. A lower DSS means symptoms are less severe. The evaluation is based on the average DSS during the peak RS. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: The 15-day period during the ragweed season with the highest moving pollen average

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Short Ragweed Pollen Allergen Extract2.55
Placebo3.95

[back to top]

Average Rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) DMS During the Peak RS

This DMS endpoint consists of a total of scores for use of RC medications: loratadine syrup or tablets (6 points), olopatadine (6 points), and mometasone (8 points). The score range of the RC DMS is 0-20 points, and a lower DMS means that less medication is used. The method used for analysis of the RC DMS is a zero-inflated log-normal model, which takes the average RC DMS during the peak RS as the response and adjusts for the same terms as in the ANOVA model. The components that contribute to the DMS endpoint are collected in an e-diary completed by the participant/parent/guardian. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: The 15-day period during the ragweed season with the highest moving pollen average

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Short Ragweed Pollen Allergen Extract2.01
Placebo3.85

[back to top]

Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Peak Ragweed Season (RS)

TCS is daily symptom score (DSS) plus daily medication score (DMS), assessed in the peak RS (15 consecutive RS days with the highest 15-day average pollen count). The rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) DSS assesses 6 allergy symptoms measured on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=no symptoms, 3=severe symptoms; score range: 0-18). Lower DSS indicates less RC symptoms. The RC DMS is based on use of RC rescue medications (loratadine, olopatadine, mometasone), with different rescue medications being assigned different scores/dose unit (score range: 0-20). Lower DMS indicates less RC medication use. Summed RC DSS+DMS could range from 0 to 38; a lower score indicates less RC symptoms and medication use. Components that contribute to DSS and DMS endpoints are collected in an electronic diary (e-diary) completed by the participant/parent/guardian. Evaluation is based on average TCS during peak RS. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: The 15-day period during the ragweed season with the highest moving pollen average

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Short Ragweed Pollen Allergen Extract4.39
Placebo7.12

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Treated With Epinephrine

Self-injectable epinephrine was provided to each participant/parent/guardian at randomization in countries where it is a regulatory requirement, and was to be available around the time treatment is administered at home. Self-injectable epinephrine was intended for immediate self-administration for an anaphylactic reaction, including symptoms/signs of upper airway obstruction. Instances of treatment with forms of epinephrine other than systemic epinephrine (e.g., inhaled racepinephrine) were counted as use of epinephrine. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: Up to 35 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Short Ragween Pollen Allergen Extract0.19
Placebo0.20

[back to top]

Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of Night-time Awakenings

"The efficacy of AZD7594 was assessed in terms of change in nighttime awakenings in each treatment period. The patients were asked to answer 'Yes' or 'No' to the question of Did your asthma cause you to wake up last night?. If yes, the number and percentage of days that had a night-time awakening were determined for each of the study periods." (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: At baseline and from Day 2 to Day 15 in each period

,
InterventionNumber of nighttime awakenings (Least Squares Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 250 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 800 μg vs. PBO
AZD7594-0.4120-0.1729-0.7595
Placebo0.0065410.0065410.006541

[back to top]

Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 Following Multiple Dose Administration by Assessment of AUC(0-24) of AZD7594

Comparison of AUC(0-24) (Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours after administration) of AZD7594 on Day 14 of each treatment period; up to 10 samples were collected in each period (i.e. in participants with intensive pharmacokinetic assessments, at pre-dose and 15 and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 h post-dose) (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: On Day 14 in each period (in participants with intensive pharmacokinetic assessments, at pre-dose and 15 and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 h post-dose)

Interventionh*pmol/L (Geometric Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg467.1
AZD7594 250 μg1725
AZD7594 800 μg4894

[back to top]

Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline to Day 8 in Asthma Control Questionnaire-5

The efficacy of AZD7594 was assessed in terms of change from baseline to Day 15 in Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 in each treatment period. Five questions were asked and each question was scored on a scale of 0 to 6, where a lower score represents a more severe impairment/symptom. The ACQ-5 score at a given visit was defined as the average of the scores given for each of the questions, calculated as ACQ-5 score = Sum of 5 scores/5. (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: At baseline and on Day 8 in each period

,
InterventionUnit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 250 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 800 μg vs. PBO
AZD7594-0.2724-0.1980-0.3604
Placebo-0.1072-0.1072-0.1072

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Assessment of safety and tolerability of three dose levels of AZD7594 in participants with mild to moderate asthma. IP referred to investigational product. (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: From Screening to Follow-up (these two examinations are up to 165 days apart)

,,,
InterventionNumber of participants (Number)
Any AEAE causally related to IPAny AE with an outcome of deathAny SAE (including events with outcome of death)Any AE leading to discontinuation of IP
AZD7594 250 μg91000
AZD7594 58 μg131000
AZD7594 800 μg122000
Placebo173001

[back to top]

Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 Following Multiple Dose Administration by Assessment of AUC(0-last) of AZD7594

Comparison of AUC(0-last) (Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (Day 1 and Day 14)) of AZD7594 (i.e. in participants with intensive pharmacokinetic assessments) (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: On Day 1 and Day 14 in each period (in participants with intensive pharmacokinetic assessments, on Day 1 at pre-dose and 15 and 30 minutes, and 1, 2 and 4 h post-dose, on Day 14 at pre-dose and 15 and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 h post-dose)

,,
Interventionh*pmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 14
AZD7594 250 μg188.51728
AZD7594 58 μg56.85467.3
AZD7594 800 μg371.84897

[back to top]

Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline to Day 15 in Asthma Control Questionnaire-5

The efficacy of AZD7594 was assessed in terms of change from baseline to Day 15 in Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 in each treatment period. Five questions were asked and each question was scored on a scale of 0 to 6, where a higher score represents a more severe impairment/symptom. The ACQ-5 score at a given visit was defined as the average of the scores given for each of the questions, calculated as ACQ-5 score = Sum of 5 scores/5. (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: At baseline and on Day 15 in each period

,
InterventionUnit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 250 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 800 μg vs. PBO
AZD7594-0.2929-0.1681-0.4158
Placebo0.014280.14280.01428

[back to top]

Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) on Day 8

The efficacy of AZD7594 was assessed in terms of change from baseline in fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) on Day 8 (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: On Day 1 (pre-dose) and on Day 8 in each period

,
InterventionParts per billion (ppb) (Least Squares Mean)
AZD7594 58 (Participant count=32) µg vs. PBOAZD7594 250 µg (Participant count=33) vs. PBOAZD7594 800 µg (Participant count=32) vs. PBO
AZD7594-9.153-14.71-19.04
Placebo-4.296-4.296-4.296

[back to top]

Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 Following Multiple Dose Administration by Assessment of Cmax/D of AZD7594

Comparison of Cmax/D (dose-normalized Cmax) of AZD7594 (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: On Day 1 in each period

Interventionpmol/L/μmol (Geometric Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg380.8
AZD7594 250 μg223.4
AZD7594 800 μg128.5

[back to top]

Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) on Day 15

The efficacy of AZD7594 was assessed in terms of change from baseline in fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) on Day 15 (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: On Day 1 (pre-dose) and on Day 15 in each period

,
InterventionParts per billion (ppb) (Least Squares Mean)
AZD7594 58 µg (Participant count=32) vs. PBOAZD7594 250 µg (Participant count=33) vs. PBOAZD7594 800 µg (Participant count=32) vs. PBO
AZD7594-14.40-14.81-20.44
Placebo-0.5488-0.5488-0.5488

[back to top]

Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (ePEF) Before Administration Over the Treatment Period

The efficacy of AZD7594 was assessed in terms of change from baseline in evening peak expiratory flow (ePEF) in each treatment period. The first PEF measurement was on the evening of Visit 1. Every morning and every evening after Visit 1, patients were required to perform 3 maneuvers for PEF assessment. The highest value from among the 3 assessments was marked as ePEF together with the date and time of the measurement. The final PEF assessment was done on the morning of Visit 11 (Day 15 of Treatment Period 3). (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: Every evening from Day 1 to Day 14 in each period

,
InterventionL/min (Least Squares Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 250 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 800 μg vs. PBO
AZD75947.4756.04011.65
Placebo-8.257-8.257-8.257

[back to top]

Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Rescue Salbutamol Over the Treatment Period

The efficacy of AZD7594 was assessed in terms of change from baseline in average daily use of salbutamol (each morning and evening) in each treatment period. (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: Every day from Day 1 to Day 15 (from evening of Day 1 to morning of Day 15)

,
InterventionNumber of inhalations per day (Least Squares Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 250 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 800 μg vs. PBO
AZD7594-0.6776-0.8193-1.137
Placebo-0.3340-0.3340-0.3340

[back to top]

Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 Following Multiple Dose Administration by Assessment of Cmax,ss of AZD7594

Comparison of Cmax,ss (observed maximum plasma concentration at steady state) of AZD7594 on Day 14 of each treatment period; up to 10 samples were collected in each period (i.e. in participants with intensive pharmacokinetic assessments, at pre-dose and 15 and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 h post-dose) (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: On Day 14 in each period (in participants with intensive pharmacokinetic assessments, at pre-dose and 15 and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 h post-dose)

Interventionpmol/L (Geometric Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg54.97
AZD7594 250 μg158.7
AZD7594 800 μg421.6

[back to top]

Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of Daily Symptom Score

The efficacy of AZD7594 was assessed in terms of change in daily symptom score from baseline to average of treatment period post dose (Day 1-14) in each treatment period. Severity scores for asthma symptoms were recorded twice daily, once in the morning and once in the evening with the scoring system of 0-no asthma symptoms, 1-toleratable asthma symptoms, 2-discomfort asthma symptoms with normal activities (or with sleep) and 3-asthma symptoms with impaired normal activities (or to sleep). (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: At baseline and from Day 1 to Day 14 in each period

,
InterventionUnit on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 250 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 800 μg vs. PBO
AZD7594-0.1190-0.09435-0.2150
Placebo-0.01229-0.01229-0.01229

[back to top]

Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of Asthma Control Days

The efficacy of AZD7594 was assessed in terms of amount of asthma control days in each treatment period. An asthma control day was defined as a day with asthma symptom score = 0, a night with no awakenings due to asthma symptoms and a day with no use of rescue medication. A given calendar day was defined as an asthma control day if it fulfills the criteria for a symptom-free day and for a rescue medication-free day (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: At baseline and from Day 1 to Day 14 post-dose in each period

,
InterventionAsthma control days (Least Squares Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 250 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 800 μg vs. PBO
AZD75940.95020.7051.219
Placebo0.27730.27730.2773

[back to top]

Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 Following Multiple Dose Administration by Assessment of Cmin of AZD7594

Comparison of steady-state minimum (pre-dose) concentration (Cmin) of AZD7594 in each treatment period (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: On Day 14 at pre-dose in each period

Interventionpmol/L (Geometric Mean)
AZD7594 58 μgNA
AZD7594 250 μg55.95
AZD7594 800 μg191.6

[back to top]

Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 Following Multiple Dose Administration by Assessment of Cavg,ss of AZD7594

Comparison of Cavg,ss (average plasma concentration during a dosing interval at steady state) of AZD7594 on Day 14 of each treatment period; up to 10 samples were collected in each period (i.e. in participants with intensive pharmacokinetic assessments, at pre-dose and 15 and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 h post-dose) (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: On Day 14 in each period (in participants with intensive pharmacokinetic assessments, at pre-dose and 15 and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 h post-dose)

Interventionpmol/L (Geometric Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg19.48
AZD7594 250 μg71.89
AZD7594 800 μg203.9

[back to top]

Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 Following Multiple Dose Administration by Assessment of Tmax,ss of AZD7594

Comparison of tmax,ss (time to reach maximum plasma concentration at steady state) of AZD7594 on Day 14 of each treatment period; up to 10 samples were collected in each period (i.e. in participants with intensive pharmacokinetic assessments, at pre-dose and 15 and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 h post-dose) (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: On Day 14 in each period (in participants with intensive pharmacokinetic assessments, at pre-dose and 15 and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 h post-dose)

InterventionHour (Median)
AZD7594 58 μg0.25
AZD7594 250 μg0.25
AZD7594 800 μg0.25

[back to top]

Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 Following Multiple Dose Administration by Assessment of AUC(0-24)/D of AZD7594

Comparison of AUC(0-24)/D (dose-normalized AUC(0-24)) of AZD7594 (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: On Day 14 in each period

Interventionh*pmol/L/ μmol (Geometric Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg4886
AZD7594 250 μg4188
AZD7594 800 μg3708

[back to top]

Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 by Assessment of AUC(0-4) of AZD7594

Comparison of AUC(0-4) (Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 4 hours after administration) of AZD7594 on Day 1 of each treatment period; up to 6 samples were collected in each period (i.e. in participants with intensive pharmacokinetic assessments, at pre-dose and 15 and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, and 4 h post-dose). (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: On Day 1 in each period (in participants with intensive pharmacokinetic assessments, at pre-dose and 15 and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, and 4 h post-dose)

Interventionh*pmol/L (Geometric Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg85.02
AZD7594 250 μg188.4
AZD7594 800 μg371.1

[back to top]

Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 by Assessment of Cmax of AZD7594

Comparison of Cmax (maximum observed plasma concentration) of AZD7594 on Day 1 of each treatment period; up to 6 samples were collected in each period (i.e. in participants with intensive pharmacokinetic assessments, at pre-dose and 15 and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, and 4 h post-dose) (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: On Day 1 in each period (in participants with intensive pharmacokinetic assessments, at pre-dose and 15 and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, and 4 h post-dose)

Interventionpmol/L (Geometric Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg36.40
AZD7594 250 μg92.02
AZD7594 800 μg169.7

[back to top]

Rate and Extent of Absorption of Three Dose Levels of AZD7594 by Assessment of Tmax of AZD7594

Comparison of tmax (time to reach maximum plasma concentration) of AZD7594 on Day 1 of each treatment period; up to 6 samples were collected in each period (i.e. in participants with intensive pharmacokinetic assessments, at pre-dose and 15 and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, and 4 h post-dose) (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: On Day 1 in each period (in participants with intensive pharmacokinetic assessments, at pre-dose and 15 and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, and 4 h post-dose)

InterventionHour (Median)
AZD7594 58 μg0.25
AZD7594 250 μg0.25
AZD7594 800 μg0.25

[back to top]

Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) on Day 8

The efficacy of AZD7594 was assessed in terms of change from baseline in morning trough forced vital capacity (FVC) on Day 8 (defined as the average of the values at 23:00 and 23:30 hours after last dose of investigational medicinal product [IMP] on Day 7) (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: On Day 1 (pre-dose) and on Day 8 (pre-dose) in each period

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 250 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 800 μg vs. PBO
AZD75940.061790.084100.1527
Placebo0.084410.084410.08441

[back to top]

Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) on Day 15

The efficacy of AZD7594 was assessed in terms of change from baseline in morning trough forced vital capacity (FVC) on Day 15 (defined as the average of the values at 23:00 and 23:30 hours after last dose of investigational medicinal product [IMP] on Day 14) (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: On Day 1 (pre-dose) and on Day 15 (pre-dose) in each period

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 250 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 800 μg vs. PBO
AZD75940.041860.10470.1382
Placebo0.076530.076530.0765

[back to top]

Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) on Day 8

The efficacy of AZD7594 was assessed in terms of change from baseline in morning trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) on Day 8 (defined as the average of the values at 23:00 and 23:30 hours after last dose of investigational medicinal product [IMP] on Day 7) (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: On Day 1 (pre-dose) and on Day 8 (pre-dose) in each period

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 250 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 800 μg vs. PBO
AZD75940.10160.088560.2272
Placebo0.071120.071120.07112

[back to top]

Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Morning Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) on Day 15

Comparison of the efficacy of AZD7594 in terms of change from baseline in morning trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) on Day 15 (defined as the average of the values at 23:00 and 23:30 hours after last dose of investigational medicinal product [IMP] on Day 14) with placebo (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: On Day 1 (pre-dose) and on Day 15 in each period

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
AZD7594 58 µg vs. PBOAZD7594 250 µg vs.PBOAZD7594 800 µg vs.PBO
AZD75940.086390.13550.2072
Placebo0.059480.059480.05948

[back to top]

Efficacy of AZD7594 by Assessment of the Change From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (mPEF) Before Administration Over the Treatment Period

The efficacy of AZD7594 was assessed in terms of change from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow (mPEF) before administration of the investigational medicinal product (IMP) in each treatment period. The first PEF measurement was on the evening of Visit 1. Every morning and every evening after Visit 1, patients were required to perform 3 maneuvers for PEF assessment. The highest value from among the 3 assessments was marked as mPEF with the date and time of the measurement. The final PEF assessment was done on the morning of Visit 11 (Day 15 of Treatment Period 3). (NCT02479412)
Timeframe: Every morning at pre-dose from Day 1 to Day 15

,
InterventionL/min (Least Squares Mean)
AZD7594 58 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 250 μg vs. PBOAZD7594 800 μg vs. PBO
AZD759410.425.33412.60
Placebo0.081360.081360.08136

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 24-hour Urinary Cortisol Excretion at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42)

The 24 hr urinary cortisol excretion was collected over a 24 hour period on Day 0 and Day 42. Change from baseline in 24- hr urinary cortisol excretion was calculated as a ratio from baseline defined as 24-hr urinary cortisol excretion at Week 6 divided by the baseline 24-hr urinary cortisol excretion. The ratio from baseline was loge transformed prior to analysis. The loge transformed ratio was compared between treatment groups using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, allowing for the effects of baseline (loge transformed), age, sex and region. Treatment ratios for comparison was calculated by back-transforming the difference between the Least square (LS) means. Using the pooled estimate of variance, 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) was calculated for the difference. Participants with 24-hr urinary cortisol excretion at baseline and Week 6 were analyzed. (NCT02483975)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) Day 42

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Fluticasone Furoate 50 mcg0.69
Placebo1.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 0-24 Hour Weighted Mean Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (D 42) in Intention-to-treat (ITT) Population

The blood samples for statistical analysis of serum cortisol (SC) endpoints were collected on D 0 and D 42 at the indicated time points. The weighted mean was calculated by dividing the area under the curve (AUC) over the 24-hour (hr) time period by the time period. Change from Baseline in 0-24 hr weighted mean SC was calculated as a ratio from Baseline defined as the SC weighted mean (0-24 hours) at Week 6 divided by the Baseline SC weighted mean (0-24 hours).The ratio from Baseline was loge transformed prior to analysis. The loge transformed ratios were compared between treatment groups as treatment ratios, using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, allowing for the effects of Baseline (loge transformed), age, sex and region. Treatment ratios for comparison was calculated by back-transforming the difference between the Least square (LS) means. Using the pooled estimate of variance, 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) was calculated for the difference. (NCT02483975)
Timeframe: Baseline, D 0 (Pre-dose, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 12hr, 16hr and 24hr) and Day 42 (0hr, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 16hr and 24hr)

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Fluticasone Furoate 50 mcg1.02
Placebo1.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 0-24 Hour Weighted Mean Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42) in SC Population

The blood samples for statistical analysis of serum cortisol (SC) endpoints were collected on D0 and D42 at indicated time points. The weighted mean was calculated by dividing the area under curve (AUC) over the 24-hr time period by time period. Change from Baseline in 0-24 hr weighted mean SC was calculated as a ratio from baseline defined as SC weighted mean (0-24 hrs) at Wk 6 divided by the baseline SC weighted mean (0-24 hrs). The ratio as treatment ratios, using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, allowing for the effects of baseline (loge transformed from baseline was loge transformed prior to analysis. The loge transformed ratios were compared between treatment groups), age, sex and region. Treatment ratios for comparison was calculated by back-transforming the difference between Least square (LS) means. Using the pooled estimate of variance, 95% CIs) was calculated for the difference. (NCT02483975)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 0 (Predose, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 12hr, 16hr and 24hr) and Day 42 (0hr, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 16hr and 24hr)

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Fluticasone Furoate 50 mcg1.02
Placebo1.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 24-hour 6-beta Hydroxycortisol Excretion at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42).

The 24 hr urinary 6-beta hydroxycortisol excretion was collected over a 24 hour period on Day 0 and Day 42. Change from baseline in 24- hr urinary 6-beta hydroxycortisol excretion was calculated as a ratio from baseline defined as 24-hr urinary 6-beta hydroxycortisol excretion at Week 6 divided by the baseline 24-hr urinary 6-beta hydroxycortisol excretion. The ratio from baseline was loge transformed prior to analysis. The loge transformed ratio was compared between treatment groups using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, allowing for the effects of baseline (loge transformed), age, sex and region. Treatment ratios for comparison was calculated by back-transforming the difference between the Least square (LS) means. Using the pooled estimate of variance, 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) was calculated for the difference. Participants with 24-hr urinary cortisol excretion at baseline and Week 6 were analyzed. (NCT02483975)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) Day 42

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Fluticasone Furoate 50 mcg0.78
Placebo0.90

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0-24 Hour Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42).

The blood samples for statistical analysis of area under the curve over the 24 hours (AUC 0-24 hours) endpoints were collected on Day 0 and Day 42 at the indicated time points. The AUC 0-24 hours was calculated using trapezoidal rule. Change from baseline in AUC 0-24 hour was calculated as a ratio from baseline defined as the AUC (0-24 hours) at Week 6 divided by the baseline AUC (0-24 hours) The ratio from baseline was loge transformed prior to analysis. The loge transformed ratios were compared between treatment groups as treatment ratios using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, allowing for the effects of baseline (loge transformed), age, sex and region. Treatment ratios for comparison was calculated by back-transforming the difference between the Least square (LS) means. Using the pooled estimate of variance, 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) was calculated for the difference. Par. with SC weighted mean (0-24hr) calculated at baseline and Week 6 were analyzed (NCT02483975)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week Baseline, Day 0 (Predose, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 12hr, 16hr and 24hr) and Day 42 (0hr, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 16hr and 24hr)

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Fluticasone Furoate 50 mcg1.02
Placebo1.00

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE).

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Number of participants with AEs and SAEs have been presented. Two participants randomized to Sequence 1 (Placebo/FF), were treated with placebo in Period 1; however, neither received FF in Period 2, due to premature withdrawal. (NCT02502734)
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment until follow-up (assessed up to 54 days)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo15
Fluticasone Furoate7

[back to top]

Mean Growth Rate in Lower-leg Growth, as Determined by Knemometry.

Lower leg growth rate was assessed in growth population as change in the lower leg length from start to end of each 2-week period, divided by time interval (number of days) between the two measurements, multiplied by 7. The Growth Population is defined as the Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population excluding participants having any of the following: did not fulfill growth-specific criteria; did not have growth assessment(s) at any defined time point; withdrawal from study due to adverse events related to major trauma to the legs, major surgery, or severe dehydration; received protocol prohibited medications that may affect short term growth, prior to randomization and during the study; protocol deviations defined in exclusion criteria for growth population. ITT Population consists of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. (NCT02502734)
Timeframe: Over a two week (14 day) treatment period for FF 50mcg OD and Placebo respectively.

Interventionmillimeter per week (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.3638
Fluticasone Furoate0.3118

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Trough Morning Forced Expiratory Volume in One Minute (FEV1) Rate Over the 6-Week Treatment Period

Change from baseline in the weekly average of daily trough morning (pre-dose and pre-rescue bronchodilator) FEV1 by handheld spirometer over the 6-week treatment period. FEV1 were determined twice daily, in the morning and in the evening, before administration of study drug or rescue medications. A handheld spirometer was provided to patients and used to determine the morning and evening FEV1 throughout the study. The spirometer was programmed to record the highest FEV1 obtained from 3 valid attempts. Baseline was defined as the average of recorded trough morning FEV1 assessments over the 7 days prior to the first dose of double-blind study treatment, including the morning assessment at the randomization visit. The LS means, difference of LS means and its 95% confidence interval, and p value are obtained from the mixed model for repeated measures analysis with covariate adjustment for baseline, sex, age, current asthma therapy, treatment, week, and treatment by week interaction. (NCT02513160)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -7 to Day 0 which is part of the Run-in Period); Treatment Period from Day 0 up to 6 weeks

Interventionmilliliters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-8
BAI 320 mcg/Day162
BAI 640 mcg/Day135
MDI 320 mcg/Day125

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 6-Week Treatment Period

Asthma symptom scores were recorded in the patient's diary each morning and evening before determining FEV1 and PEF and before administration of study or rescue medications. The Daytime Symptom Score was recorded in the evening on a scale of 0 (No symptoms during the day) to 5 (Symptoms so severe that I could not go to work or perform normal daily activities) plus the Nighttime Symptom Score in the morning on a scale of 0 (No symptoms during the night) to 4 (Symptoms so severe that I did not sleep at all) for a total score range of 0-9. Baseline was defined as the average of recorded daily asthma symptom scores (average of daytime and nighttime score) over the 7 days prior to the first dose of double-blind study treatment, including the morning assessment at the randomization visit. The LS means, difference of LS means and its 95% CI, and p value are obtained from the mixed model for repeated measures analysis with covariate adjustment for baseline, sex, age, current asth (NCT02513160)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -7 to Day 0 which is part of the Run-in Period); Treatment Period from Day 0 up to 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.06
BAI 320 mcg/Day-0.18
BAI 640 mcg/Day-0.26
MDI 320 mcg/Day-0.24

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Total Daily (24-Hour) Rescue Medication Use Over the 6-Week Treatment Period

Change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol over weeks 1 through 6. Patients recorded the number of inhalations (puffs used) of rescue medication (albuterol/salbutamol HFA MDI [90 mcg ex-actuator] or equivalent) each morning and evening in the diary. The average number of daily inhalations over the 7 days before the randomization visit was the baseline value and was compared with the rescue medication use during the 6-week treatment period. (NCT02513160)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -7 to Day 0 which is part of the Run-in Period); Treatment Period from Day 0 up to 6 weeks

Interventionnumber of inhalations (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.37
BAI 320 mcg/Day-0.73
BAI 640 mcg/Day-0.66
MDI 320 mcg/Day-0.66

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Trough Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Rate Over the 6-Week Treatment Period

Change from baseline in the weekly average of daily trough morning (pre-dose and pre-rescue bronchodilator) PEF by handheld spirometer over the 6-week treatment period. PEF were determined twice daily, in the morning and in the evening, before administration of study drug or rescue medications. A handheld spirometer was provided to patients and used to determine the morning and evening PEF throughout the study. The spirometer was programmed to record the highest PEF obtained from 3 valid attempts. Baseline was defined as the average of recorded trough morning PEF assessments over the 7 days prior to the first dose of double-blind study treatment, including the morning assessment at the randomization visit. The LS means, difference of LS means and its 95% confidence interval, and p value are obtained from the mixed model for repeated measures analysis with covariate adjustment for baseline, sex, age, current asthma therapy, treatment, week, and treatment by week interaction. (NCT02513160)
Timeframe: Timeframes: Baseline (Day -7 to Day 0 which is part of the Run-in Period); Treatment Period from Day 0 up to 6 weeks

Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-10.0
BAI 320 mcg/Day20.1
BAI 640 mcg/Day11.9
MDI 320 mcg/Day10.9

[back to top]

Count of Participants Withdrawn From Study Drug Treatment Due to Meeting Stopping Criteria for Worsening Asthma

"Number of participants who were withdrawn from study drug due to worsening asthma. Alert criteria for individual patients with worsening asthma were designed to ensure patient safety. The investigator determined whether the patient's overall clinical picture was consistent with worsening asthma and if the patient should be withdrawn from study drug treatment (but not the study) and be placed on appropriate asthma therapy in the interest of patient safety. An example of an alert criteria is:~Morning FEV1 by handheld spirometer as measured at home falls below the FEV1 stability limit (FEV1 <80%) as calculated at the screening visit for the Run-in Period and at the randomization visit (Day 0) for the Treatment Period on 4 or more days out of any 7-day period." (NCT02513160)
Timeframe: Day 0 to Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo10
BAI 320 mcg/Day1
BAI 640 mcg/Day0
MDI 320 mcg/Day1

[back to top]

Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or an important medical event that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization, but may jeopardize the patient and may require medical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition. (NCT02513160)
Timeframe: Day 0 to Week 6

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>=1 adverse event>=1 mild TEAE>=1 moderate TEAE>=1 severe TEAE>=1 treatment-related TEAE>=1 serious TEAE>=1 AE leading to withdrawal of study drug
BAI 320 mcg/Day2210111201
BAI 640 mcg/Day3218104921
MDI 320 mcg/Day3220111400
Placebo201091100

[back to top]

Standardized Baseline-Adjusted Trough Morning Forced Expiratory Volume in One Minute (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time Zero to 6 Weeks (AUEC(0-6wk))

The primary efficacy variable was the standardized baseline-adjusted trough morning (pre-dose and pre-rescue bronchodilator) FEV1 AUEC(0-6wk). Pulmonary function measurements such as FEV1 were obtained electronically by spirometry at the randomization visit, each treatment visit (Weeks 2, 4 and 6) and any unscheduled visit (such as the early termination visit). The highest FEV1 value from 3 acceptable and 2 repeatable maneuvers (maximum of 8 attempts) was used. The least-square (LS) means, difference of LS means and its 95% confidence interval (CI), and p-value represent the results obtained from the analysis of covariance with covariate adjustment for baseline, sex, age, current asthma therapy, and treatment. (NCT02513160)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0 of Treatment Period), weeks 2, 4, 6

Interventionmilliliters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo62
BAI 320 mcg/Day205
BAI 640 mcg/Day212
MDI 320 mcg/Day210

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Maximum Possible Reduction in Oral Corticosteroids Dose Per Protocol at Week 24 While Maintaining Asthma Control

For all participants except those with baseline OCS dose at 35 mg/day, the maximum possible reduction corresponds to reduction to 0 mg/day (no longer requiring OCS). For participants starting with 35 mg/day at baseline, the maximum possible reduction is 32.5 mg/day (i.e. minimum dose per protocol is 2.5 mg). (NCT02528214)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo q2w29.9
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w52.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who No Longer Required Oral Corticosteroids Dose at Week 24 While Maintaining Asthma Control

Participants were classified according to the binary status of whether or not the participant still required OCS at Week 24 while maintaining asthma control. (NCT02528214)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo q2w29.2
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w52.4

[back to top]

Percentage Reduction From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Dose at Week 24 While Maintaining Asthma Control

Percentage reduction of OCS dose was calculated as (optimized OCS dose [mg/day] at baseline - final OCS dose at Week 24)/optimized OCS dose at baseline x 100. Result is presented as Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) percentage reduction from baseline derived from ANCOVA model with missing data multiply imputed. (NCT02528214)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionPercentage reduction from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo q2w41.85
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w70.09

[back to top]

Supplementary Presentation of Primary Outcome Measure Data: Median Percentage Reduction From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroids Dose at Week 24 While Maintaining Asthma Control

The Primary Outcome Measure (Percentage Reduction From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroids Dose at Week 24 While Maintaining Asthma Control) is summarized above, as LS Mean (SE). Table below provides a supplementary presentation of the Primary Outcome Measure data; result is presented as median (inter-quartile range). Percentage reduction of OCS dose was calculated as (optimized OCS dose [mg/day] at baseline - final OCS dose at Week 24)/optimized OCS dose at baseline x 100. (NCT02528214)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage reduction from baseline (Median)
Placebo q2w50.0
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w100.0

[back to top]

Absolute Reduction From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroids Dose at Week 24 While Maintaining Asthma Control

Absolute reduction was calculated by subtracting Week 24 value from baseline value. (NCT02528214)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
Interventionmg/day (Mean)
BaselineWeek 24Absolute reduction at Week 24
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w10.753.137.66
Placebo q2w11.756.325.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-Question Version (ACQ-5) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

The ACQ-5 has 5 questions, reflecting top-scoring 5 asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze. Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during previous week and to respond to each of 5 symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). ACQ-5 total score was mean of scores of all 5 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control. (NCT02528214)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 16Change at Week 20Change at Week 24
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-0.49-0.61-0.68-0.92-0.87-0.83-0.94
Placebo q2w-0.18-0.36-0.39-0.54-0.57-0.53-0.57

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12 and Week 24

AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that were most important to participants with asthma. AQLQ comprised of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item was scored on a 7-point likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire were averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life. (NCT02528214)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 12Change at Week 24
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.780.94
Placebo q2w0.560.56

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Week 12 and Week 24

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by EuroQol Group in order to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. EQ-5D consists of EQ-5D descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state. EQ-5D-5L-VAS records participant's self-rated health on a vertical VAS that allows them to indicate their health state that can range from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable). (NCT02528214)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Single Index: Change at Week 12Single Index: Change at Week 24VAS Score: Change at Week 12VAS Score: Change at Week 24
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.030.059.3411.06
Placebo q2w0.040.055.994.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 12 and 24

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. (NCT02528214)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

,
Interventionliter (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Change at Week 12Week 24Change at Week 24
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w1.531.820.291.840.29
Placebo q2w1.631.680.061.630.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sino Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) Global Score at Week 12 and Week 24

The SNOT-22 is a validated measure of health related quality of life in sino nasal disease. It is a 22 item questionnaire with each item assigned a score ranging from 0-5. The total score may range from 0 (no disease) -110 (worst disease), lower scores represent better health related quality of life. (NCT02528214)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 12Change at Week 24
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-12.45-14.56
Placebo q2w-3.79-2.46

[back to top]

Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 24-Week Treatment Period

A severe asthma exacerbation event was defined as a deterioration of asthma during the 24-week treatment period requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for >=3 days (at least double the dose currently used); and/or hospitalization related to asthma symptoms or emergency room visit because of asthma requiring intervention with a systemic corticosteroid treatment. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated. (NCT02528214)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

InterventionExacerbation per participant-year (Number)
Placebo q2w1.597
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.649

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving >= 50% Reduction in Oral Corticosteroids Dose at Week 24 While Maintaining Asthma Control

Participants were classified according to the binary status of whether or not the 50% OCS dose reduction criterion was achieved at week 24. (NCT02528214)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo q2w53.3
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w79.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction in Oral Corticosteroids Dose to <5 mg/Day at Week 24 While Maintaining Asthma Control

Participants were classified according to the binary status of whether or not the reduction of OCS dose to <5 mg/day was achieved at Week 24. (NCT02528214)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo q2w37.4
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w71.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Week 12 and Week 24

The HADS is a general scale to detect states of anxiety and depression already used and validated in asthma, which includes HADS-A and HADS-D subscales. The instrument is comprised of 14 items: 7 related to anxiety (HADS-A) and 7 to depression (HADS-D). Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3. And, the total score is the sum of the scores of the 14 items ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 42 (severe symptoms), with higher scores indicating higher anxiety/depression complains. (NCT02528214)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 12Change at Week 24
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-2.13-2.53
Placebo q2w-0.75-0.99

[back to top]

Change in PAS Score (Points on a Scale)

"Based on examination and auscultation of lungs prior to and immediately following albuterol administration.~PAS score is on a scale of 0-10 which is a sum of five separate sub-scores each on a scale of 0-2. The five sub-scores are:~Respiratory rate (6-12yr/>12yr): <=26/23 (0), 27-30/24-27 (1), >31/28 (2)~Oxygenation: >95% (0), 90-95 (1), <90 (2)~Auscultation: clear/end expiratory wheeze (0), expiratory wheeze (1), biphasic wheeze/diminished (2)~Work of Breathing (accessory muscles): <= 1 (0), 2 (1), >=3 (2)~Dyspnea: Full sentences (0), Partial sentences (1), Single words (2)~Pre-treatment assessment at the time of study enrollment. Post-treatment assessment following the administration of one time 5mg nebulized albuterol sulfate treatment. Assessments taken at baseline (prior to albuterol therapy) and 10 min post-treatment. Change in PAS calculated as post-treatment PAS minus pre-treatment PAS." (NCT02566902)
Timeframe: 10 minutes

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
T-piece Nebulizer-1
Breath-Enhanced Nebulizer-2

[back to top]

Change in PASS Score (Points on a Scale)

"Determined by examination and auscultation of lungs to prior to and immediately following albuterol administration.~PASS is a total score on a scale of 0-6 which is calculated as a sum of three sub-scores, each on a scale of 0-2. The sub-scores are:~Wheezing: None or Mild (0), Moderate (1), Severe wheezing or absent wheezing due to poor air exchange (2)~Work of breathing (accessory muscle use or retractions): None or mild (0), Moderate (1), Severe (2)~Prolonged expiration: Normal or mildly prolonged (0), moderately prolonged (1), severely prolonged (2)~Pre-treatment assessment at the time of study enrollment. Post-treatment assessment following the administration of one time 5mg nebulized albuterol sulfate treatment. Assessments taken at baseline (prior to albuterol therapy) and 10 min post-treatment. Change in PASS calculated as post-treatment PASS minus pre-treatment PASS." (NCT02566902)
Timeframe: 10 minutes

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
T-piece Nebulizer-1
Breath-Enhanced Nebulizer-1

[back to top]

Change Respiratory Rate (Breaths Per Minute)

"Respiratory rate will be measured by observation and auscultation over 30 seconds prior to and immediately following albuterol administration~Pre-treatment assessment at the time of study enrollment. Post-treatment assessment following the administration of one time 5mg nebulized albuterol sulfate treatment. Assessments taken at baseline (prior to albuterol therapy) and 10 min post-treatment. Change in respiratory rate calculated as post-treatment respiratory rate minus pre-treatment respiratory rate." (NCT02566902)
Timeframe: 10 minutes

Interventionbreaths/min (Mean)
T-piece Nebulizer-3.1
Breath-Enhanced Nebulizer-3.2

[back to top]

Emergency Department Length of Stay (Minutes)

Total length of stay will be assessed at the time of Emergency Department disposition which will be approximately 3 hours, but will be assessed up to 24 hours depending on duration of ED stay. (NCT02566902)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

Interventionminutes (Mean)
T-piece Nebulizer246.3
Breath-Enhanced Nebulizer246.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Experiencing Medication Side Effects (%)

"Subjects and parents/guardians will be asked whether subjects experienced nausea, vomiting, palpitations, headache, dizziness either during (assessed by non-blinded personnel) or following treatment (assessed by blinded personnel during post-treatment assessment). Subject and parent/guardian will also be asked if any other side effects were experienced." (NCT02566902)
Timeframe: 10 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
T-piece Nebulizer5
Breath-Enhanced Nebulizer5

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Requiring Inpatient Hospital Admission (% of Subjects)

Admission rate to inpatient hospital will be assessed at the time of Emergency Department disposition which will be approximately 3 hours, but will be assessed up to 24 hours depending on duration of ED stay. (NCT02566902)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
T-piece Nebulizer11
Breath-Enhanced Nebulizer11

[back to top]

Change in Heart Rate (Beats Per Minute)

"Blinded research personnel will assess subject's heart rate by auscultation and/or pulse palpation prior to and immediately following albuterol administration.~Pre-treatment assessment at the time of study enrollment. Post-treatment assessment following the administration of one time 5mg nebulized albuterol sulfate treatment. Assessments taken at baseline (prior to albuterol therapy) and 10 min post-treatment. Change in heart rate calculated as post-treatment heart rate minus pre-treatment heart rate." (NCT02566902)
Timeframe: 10 minutes

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
T-piece Nebulizer4.34
Breath-Enhanced Nebulizer15.05

[back to top]

Total Quantity of Albuterol Given in the Emergency Department (mg)

Cumulative dose of albuterol in mg will be assessed at the time of Emergency Department disposition which will be approximately 3 hours, but will be assessed up to 24 hours depending on duration of ED stay. (NCT02566902)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours

Interventionmg (Mean)
T-piece Nebulizer18.2
Breath-Enhanced Nebulizer18.7

[back to top]

Change in FEV1 (% Predicted)

Pre-treatment spirometry measurement assessed at the time of study enrollment. Post-treatment spirometry measurement assessed following the administration of one time 5mg nebulized albuterol sulfate treatment. Assessments taken at baseline (prior to albuterol therapy) and 10 min post-treatment. Change in FEV1 calculated as post-treatment FEV1 minus pre-treatment FEV1 (NCT02566902)
Timeframe: 10 minutes

Intervention%predicted (Mean)
T-piece Nebulizer13.8
Breath-Enhanced Nebulizer9.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose Weighted Mean Heart Rate at Day 42, Derived From Electrocardiograms (ECGs)

ECG measurements were taken in supine position after obtaining vital signs. Weighted mean was derived by calculating the area under the curve (AUC), and then dividing by the relevant time interval. Baseline was the pre-dose measurement on Day 1. Change from Baseline in 0 to 4 hours post-dose weighted mean heart rate was measured on Days 1, 28 and 42 and was analyzed using a mixed models repeated measures (MMRM) model. Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. (NCT02573870)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 42

InterventionBeats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.688
BAT/FF 300/100 µg-1.557

[back to top]

Post-dose PC20 Concentration After Receiving Differing Doses of Test, Reference, or Placebo

The primary efficacy endpoint was the postdose PC20 following administration of differing doses of albuterol (or placebo) by inhalation. The 20% reduction in FEV1 was determined relative to the saline stage FEV1 measured before albuterol or placebo administration. Additionally, an analysis of superiority to placebo was performed for the T and R products prior to the BE determination. In this study the ITT and PP populations were identical. (NCT02584257)
Timeframe: Post-dose at Visits 2-6 of the study, a total of approximately 4 weeks.

Interventionlog(mg/mL) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Dose0.608
90 mcg ProAir HFA3.779
180 mcg ProAir HFA4.432
90 mcg Lupin Albuterol HFA MDI3.928
180 mcg Lupin Albuterol HFA MDI4.481

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) Score at Week 32

The ACQ-5 is a five-item, self-completed questionnaire, which is used as a measure of asthma control of a participant. The five questions (concerning nocturnal awakening, waking in the morning, activity limitation, shortness of breath and wheeze) enquire about the frequency and/or severity of symptoms over the previous week. The response options for all these questions range from zero (no impairment/limitation) to six (total impairment/ limitation) scale. ACQ-5 score range from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicates worsening of condition. Baseline was defined as the latest available assessment prior to first dose of mepolizumab. Change from Baseline at Week 32 was calculated as Week 32 value of ACQ-5 score minus Baseline value and was analyzed using Mixed Model Repeated Measures allowing for covariates of region, baseline maintenance OCS therapy, exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as ordinal variable) and visit. (NCT02654145)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Week 32

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Mepolizumab 100 mg SC-1.45

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Score at Week 32

The SGRQ Questionnaire is a well-established, self-completed tool, comprising of 50 questions with 76 weighted responses designed to measure Quality of Life in participants with diseases of airway obstruction. It consists of two parts; Part 1 produces the symptom score and Part 2 produces the activity and impact score. A Total score is also calculated which summarizes the impact of the disease on overall health status. Scores are expressed as a percentage of overall impairment where 100 represents worst possible health status and zero indicates best possible health status. Baseline was defined as the latest available assessment prior to first dose of mepolizumab. Change from Baseline at Week 32 was calculated as Week 32 value of SGRQ score minus Baseline value and was analyzed using Mixed Model Repeated Measures allowing for covariates of region, baseline maintenance OCS therapy, exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as an ordinal variable) and visit. (NCT02654145)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Week 32

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Mepolizumab 100 mg SC-19.0

[back to top]

Ratio to Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Count at Week 32

Blood samples were collected at specific time points to measure blood eosinophils level for evaluation of pharmacodynamic effects in participants with a severe eosinophilic asthma phenotype when they were directly switched to mepolizumab. Baseline was defined as the latest available assessment prior to first dose of mepolizumab and ratio to Baseline at Week 32 was defined as Week 32 value divided by Baseline value and was analyzed using Mixed Model Repeated Measures allowing for covariates of region, Baseline maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy, exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as an ordinal variable) and visit. The log transformation was applied to blood eosinophil counts prior to analysis. If a blood eosinophil count of zero was reported, it was imputed with half of the lowest possible blood eosinophil count, where applicable, prior to log transforming the data. The dispersion measure used was log standard error. (NCT02654145)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Week 32

InterventionRatio (Least Squares Mean)
Mepolizumab 100 mg SC0.22

[back to top]

The Rate of Clinically Significant Asthma Exacerbations Over 32 Weeks' Treatment

Clinically significant exacerbations of asthma were defined as worsening of asthma which requires use of systemic corticosteroids and/or hospitalization and/or Emergency Department (ED) visits. The frequency of clinically significant asthma exacerbations over 32 weeks' treatment was analyzed using Negative Binomial Regression via generalized estimating equations with a covariate of time period (pre-treatment versus on- and off treatment). (NCT02654145)
Timeframe: Up to Week 32

InterventionExacerbation rate per year (Number)
Mepolizumab 100 mg SC1.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell Count at Week 6

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement is not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

,
Intervention10^9 cells/L (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 6
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg6.76-0.08
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg6.530.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 6

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement was not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 6
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg119.40-0.34
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg118.77-2.26

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 4

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement was not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 4
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg119.40-2.13
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg118.82-1.99

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 2

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement was not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 2
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg118.89-1.61
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg118.83-1.23

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at Week 4

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement was not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

,
Interventionbreaths/min (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 4
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg16.43-0.12
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg17.18-0.97

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at Week 6

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement was not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

,
Interventionbreaths/min (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 6
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg16.43-0.09
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg17.20-1.17

[back to top]

Average Change From Baseline in Pre-dose FEV1 at Week 4 and Week 6

FEV1 is the amount of air, measured in liters, forcibly exhaled in 1 second. Pulmonary function tests were to be performed by participants in the morning before dosing. Data presented represents the average change from baseline at Week 4 and Week 6. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Before the first dose (Baseline) and at the end of Weeks 4 and 6 of treatment

InterventionLiter (Least Squares Mean)
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg0.152
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg0.046

[back to top]

Baseline Pre-dose Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

FEV1 is the amount of air, measured in liters, forcibly exhaled in 1 second. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Before the first dose of study investigational product (Baseline)

InterventionLiter (Mean)
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg2.264
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg2.234

[back to top]

Percentage of Days With Worsening Asthma Average Over Weeks 3 to 6

"A day with worsening asthma was defined as any day during which any of the following occurred: a decrease from baseline in morning (AM) peak expiratory flow (PEF) of more than 20%; AM PEF less than 180 liters/minute (L/min); an increase in β-agonist use of more than 70% (and a minimum increase of at least 2 puffs); an increase from baseline in daytime asthma symptom score of more than 50%; overnight asthma symptom of: Awake all night; an asthma attack, as defined by any day when one or more of the following events due to asthma has occurred: corticosteroid use (systemic); unscheduled visit to the doctor or urgent care clinic; unscheduled visit to the emergency department; and/or hospitalization. Participants needed at least 80% of days with a complete diary during Weeks 3 to 6. A diary is considered complete if none of the above 6 components used to determine asthma worsening are missing." (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Up to 4 weeks

InterventionPercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg16.970
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg21.746

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE

An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Up to 6 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg0.0
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg4.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (%) at Week 6

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement is not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

,
InterventionPercent (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 6
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg42.79-0.10
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg42.64-0.33

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at Week 2

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement was not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

,
Interventionbreaths/min (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 2
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg16.40-0.30
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg17.23-1.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Platelet Count at Week 6

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement is not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

,
Intervention10^9 cells/L (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 6
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg256.85-4.97
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg258.442.65

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Neutrophil (%) at Week 6

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement is not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

,
InterventionPercent of White Blood Cells (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 6
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg59.13-1.32
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg57.860.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 6

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement was not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

,
Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 6
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg73.25-0.84
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg73.801.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 4

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement was not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 4
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg74.60-1.56
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg74.42-1.60

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 2

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement was not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 2
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg74.40-1.31
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg74.45-0.97

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 4

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement was not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

,
Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 4
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg73.25-1.82
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg73.961.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 2

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement was not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

,
Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 2
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg73.21-0.60
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg74.200.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Eosinophil (Percent [%]) at Week 6

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement is not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

,
InterventionPercent of White Blood Cells (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 6
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg4.400.11
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg3.580.51

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 6

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement was not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 6
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg74.60-1.18
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg74.29-0.95

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bilirubin at Week 6

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement is not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 6
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg0.62-0.00
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg0.54-0.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Week 6

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement is not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

,
InterventionIU/L (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 6
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg22.33-0.99
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg19.350.34

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) at Week 6

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement is not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

,
InterventionIU/L (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 6
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg61.16-0.83
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg67.960.44

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) at Week 6

Baseline was defined at Week 0. If Week 0 measurement is not available, the last non-missing value before treatment was used as Baseline. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

,
InterventionIU/L (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 6
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg23.53-0.09
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg20.640.76

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)

An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. (NCT02720081)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
MK-1029 150 mg + Montelukast 10 mg25.7
MK-1029 Placebo + Montelukast 10 mg26.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SGRQ Total Score at Week 24

SGRQ is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on HRQoL of participants with COPD. It contains 14 questions with a total of 40 items grouped into domains (Symptoms, Activity and Impacts). SGRQ total score was calculated as 100 multiplied by summed weights from all positive items divided by sum of weights for all items in questionnaire. It ranges from 0 to 100, higher score indicates poor HRQoL. Values at Week 0, pre-dose were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the value at indicated time point. Analysis was performed using a MMRM method including covariates of Baseline SGRQ Total score, stratum (number of long-acting bronchodilators per day during the run-in: 0/1 or 2), visit, geographical region, treatment, visit by treatment and visit by Baseline interaction. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25-5.841
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.5-4.935

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 24

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. It was measured using centralized spirometry. FEV1 values at Week 0, pre-dose were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the value at indicated time point. Modified Per Protocol (mPP) Population was used which comprised of all participants in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population, who do not have a full protocol deviation considered to impact efficacy. Data following a moderate/severe COPD exacerbation or pneumonia was excluded from analysis due to the potential impact of the exacerbation or the medications used to treat it. Participants with partial protocol deviations considered to impact efficacy were included in the mPP Population but had their data excluded from analysis from the time of deviation onwards. Analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionLiter (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/250.113
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.50.095

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders Based on the Saint (St) George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 24

SGRQ is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on health related quality of life (HRQoL) of participants with COPD. It contains 14 questions with a total of 40 items grouped into domains (Symptoms, Activity and Impacts). SGRQ total score was calculated as 100 multiplied by summed weights from all positive items divided by sum of weights for all items in questionnaire. It ranges from 0 to 100, higher score indicates poor HRQoL. Response was defined as an SGRQ total score of >=4 units below Baseline. Non response was defined as a SGRQ total score <4 units below Baseline or a missing SGRQ total score with no subsequent on treatment scores. ITT Population comprised of randomized participants, excluding those who were randomized in error. A participant screened or run-in failure and also randomized was considered to be randomized in error. Analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model with a logit link function. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/2550
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.551

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders Based on Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at Week 24

The TDI measures changes in the participant's dyspnea. TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the ratings recorded for each of the 3 individual scales (Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, Magnitude of Effort). Each of these scales had a possible score ranging from -6 to +6. lower scores indicating more impairment. TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the 3 individual scores and then divided by 2 (so the range of the TDI focal score is -9 to +9). The lower the score, the more deterioration in severity of dyspnea. If a score is missing for any of the three scales, then the TDI focal score was set to missing. A participant was considered as a responder if the on-treatment TDI focal score was at least 1 unit at that visit. Non-response was defined as a TDI focal score of less than 1 unit or a missing TDI focal score with no subsequent non-missing on-treatment scores. Analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model with a logit link function. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/2556
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.556

[back to top]

TDI Focal Score at Week 24

The TDI measures changes in the participant's dyspnoea. TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the ratings recorded for each of the 3 individual scales (Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, Magnitude of Effort). Each of these scales had a possible score ranging from -6 to +6. lower scores indicating more impairment. TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the 3 individual scores and then divided by 2 (so the range of the TDI focal score is -9 to +9). The lower the score, the more deterioration in severity of dyspnea. If a score is missing for any of the three scales, then the TDI focal score was set to missing. Analysis was performed using a repeated measures model. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/252.029
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.51.892

[back to top]

Time to First Moderate or Severe Exacerbation

COPD exacerbations were identified based on the investigator's clinical judgment. Worsening symptoms of COPD that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics were considered as moderate exacerbation. Worsening symptoms of COPD that required treatment with in-subject hospitalization was considered as severe exacerbation. Hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) is from a Cox proportional hazards model with covariates of treatment group, sex, exacerbation history (0, 1, >=2 moderate/severe exacerbations, prior year), smoking status (screening), stratum (number of long-acting bronchodilators per day during the run-in: 0/1 or 2), geographical region and percent predicted FEV1 at Baseline. Median and inter-quartile range (first and third quartile) have been presented. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Up to 25 weeks

InterventionDays (Median)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25NA
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.5NA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

(NCT02740660)
Timeframe: Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Caffeine 100mg / Albuterol 4mg5
Placebo2

[back to top]

Change in Lean Mass With Caffeine/Albuterol

DXA Scan of obese adolescents (NCT02740660)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionkg (Mean)
Caffeine 100mg / Albuterol 4mg1.34
Placebo0.88

[back to top]

Change in Fat Mass With Caffeine/Albuterol

DXA Scan of obese adolescents (NCT02740660)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionkg (Mean)
Caffeine 100mg / Albuterol 4mg0.97
Placebo-0.21

[back to top]

Change in Weight With Caffeine/Albuterol

(NCT02740660)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionkg (Mean)
Caffeine 100mg / Albuterol 4mg2.57
Placebo1.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morning (AM) Post-Dose % Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) in the Area Under the Curve (AUC)0-60

This endpoint reflects changes in lung function data (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) measured across 0 to 60 minutes post-dose (at 0, 5, 15, 30 and 60 minutes) and averaged across study visits in the Treatment Period (Day 1, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12) compared to Baseline. Baseline was the average of % predicted FEV1 values at 30 min and 0 min pre-dose. At each visit, the area under the curve is calculated over the post-dose timepoints. Units are standardized to percent predicted FEV1 by dividing the AUC calculation by the duration of the observed AUC. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Baseline, and average of Day 1, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12

,
InterventionPercent predicted FEV1 (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
MF MDI 100 mcg BID78.483.96
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID79.218.99

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM Pre-Dose % Predicted FEV1 With MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID or MF MDI 100 mcg BID Over the First 12 Weeks of Treatment

The change from baseline in AM pre-dose % predicted FEV1 with MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID vs MF MDI 100 mcg BID averaged over 12 weeks treatment was assessed. This secondary analysis of the change from baseline used the cLDA method without multiple imputation. A model-based MAR approach was used for missing data. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 (Averaged)

,
InterventionPercent predicted FEV1 (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline (Weeks 4, 8, and 12)
MF MDI 100 mcg BID78.220.44
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID79.211.51

[back to top]

Change From Baseline AM Post-Dose Percent Predicted FEV1 on Day 1 of Treatment

The key secondary objective was to determine the onset of action for the efficacy of MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID, compared with MF MDI 100 mcg BID. The post-dose AM % predicted FEV1 was averaged sequentially, and the change from baseline on Day 1 was assessed. This key secondary endpoint was controlled for multiplicity in a step-down fashion, based on trial success defined as a statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint for MF/F vs MF. Missing data were imputed using control-based multiple imputations with the cLDA model. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1, measured at 4 hr, 2 hr and 60, 30, 15, and 5 min, post-dose time points

,
InterventionPercent predicted FEV1 (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline (4 hr post-dose on Day 1)Change from Baseline (2 hr post-dose on Day 1)Change from Baseline (60 min post-dose on Day 1)Change from Baseline (30 min post-dose on Day 1)Change from Baseline (15 min post-dose on Day 1)Change from Baseline (5 min post-dose on Day 1)
MF MDI 100 mcg BID78.485.685.874.923.051.380.95
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID79.2111.6112.7111.059.568.005.20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline AM Post-Dose % Predicted FEV1 AUC 0-4 Hours on Day 1 and Week 12 of Treatment

This endpoint reflects changes in lung function data (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) measured across 0 to 4 hours post-dose on Day 1 and Week 12 compared to Baseline. Baseline was the average of 30 and 0 minutes pre-dose % predicted FEV1 values. The AUC was calculated over the scheduled timepoints of 0 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 2 hr and 4 hr post-dose. Units are standardized to percent predicted FEV1 by dividing the AUC calculation by the duration of the observed AUC. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 and Week 12

,
InterventionPercent predicted FEV1 (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline on Day 1Change from Baseline at Week 12
MF MDI 100 mcg BID78.482.704.87
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID79.217.137.56

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Mometsone Furoate

Blood samples were collected predose, and 0.75, 1.5, 3, 8, and 12 hours postdose at Week 12 in a subset of participants who consented to take part in a PK sub-trial. Per protocol, descriptive MF pharmacokinetics were summarized without regard to treatment assignment. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.75, 1.5, 3, 8, and 12 hours postdose at Week 12

Interventionhr (Median)
Pooled MF/F 100/10 mcg and MF 100 mcg1.47

[back to top]

Participants Whose SABA Rescue Medication Use Increased Across Weeks 1-12 of the Treatment Period

To evaluate the efficacy of MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID compared with MF MDI 100 mcg BID, the number of participants whose use of SABA rescue medication increased in Weeks 1-12 (individually) of the double-blind treatment period was assessed. All participants received SABA MDIs (albuterol 90 mcg or salbutamol 100 mcg) for relief of asthma symptoms. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Weeks 1-12 (Averaged)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID24
MF MDI 100 mcg BID34

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Mometsone Furoate

Blood samples were collected predose, and 0.75, 1.5, 3, 8, and 12 hours postdose at Week 12 in a subset of participants who consented to take part in a PK sub-trial. Per protocol, descriptive MF pharmacokinetics were summarized without regard to treatment assignment. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.75, 1.5, 3, 8, and 12 hours postdose at Week 12

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Pooled MF/F 100/10 mcg and MF 100 mcg16

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA) Rescue Medication With MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID or MF MDI 100 mcg BID Over the First 12 Weeks of Treatment

To evaluate the efficacy of MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID compared with MF MDI 100 mcg BID, the change from baseline in total daily short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) use (puffs per day) was averaged and assessed. All participants received SABA MDIs (albuterol 90 mcg or salbutamol 100 mcg) for as-needed relief of asthma symptoms. This secondary analysis of the change from baseline used the cLDA method without multiple imputation.A model-based MAR approach was used for missing data. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1-12 (Averaged)

,
InterventionPuffs per day (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline Over Weeks 1-12 (Average)
MF MDI 100 mcg BID0.13-0.02
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID0.25-0.12

[back to top]

Count (Percentage) of Participants Experiencing At Least One Adverse Event (AE)

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Up to 26 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID37
MF MDI 100 mcg BID52
Total89

[back to top]

Count (Percentage) of Participants Discontinuing From Study Medication Due to An AE

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID0
MF MDI 100 mcg BID3
Total3

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve of Mometasone Furoate From Time 0 to Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last)

Blood samples were collected predose, and 0.75, 1.5, 3, 8, and 12 hours postdose at Week 12 in a subset of participants who consented to take part in a PK sub-trial. Per protocol, descriptive MF pharmacokinetics were summarized without regard to treatment assignment. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.75, 1.5, 3, 8, and 12 hours postdose at Week 12

Interventionhr*pg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Pooled MF/F 100/10 mcg and MF 100 mcg106

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve of Mometasone Furoate From Time 0 to 12 Hours (AUC0-12)

Blood samples were collected predose, and 0.75, 1.5, 3, 8, and 12 hours postdose at Week 12 in a subset of participants who consented to take part in a PK sub-trial. Per protocol, descriptive MF pharmacokinetics were summarized without regard to treatment assignment. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.75, 1.5, 3, 8, and 12 hours postdose at Week 12

Interventionhr*pg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Pooled MF/F 100/10 mcg and MF 100 mcg109

[back to top]

Participants Using SABA Rescue Medication Across Weeks 1-12 of the Treatment Period

To evaluate the efficacy of MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID compared with MF MDI 100 mcg BID, the number of participants using SABA rescue medication in Weeks 1-12 (individually) of the double-blind treatment period was assessed. All participants received SABA MDIs (albuterol 90 mcg or salbutamol 100 mcg) for as-needed relief of asthma symptoms. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1-12 (Averaged)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
BaselineWeeks 1-12
MF MDI 100 mcg BID1745
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID2341

[back to top]

Change in Expiratory Flow Between Pre and Post-medication Dosing

Expiratory flow at 75% of vital capacity (EF75) will be measured before beginning each treatment and again 15-30 min after each treatment phase. Therefore there will be 6 pairs (12) of EF values to determine the change in EF for each treatment. this measure is done by measuring the expiratory flow at 75% of exhalation on as measure on the flow volume loop of the ventilator. a single mechanical breath is chosen and the flow volume loop is frozen on the ventilator screen. the clinician can then scroll to measure total tidal volume for the breath, then multiple this volume by 0.25 (to ascertain the volume that the time point of 75% of exhalation), then scroll along the expiratory side of the flow volume loop until the calculated volume is reached and then the flow at that time point is recorded. (NCT02766673)
Timeframe: every 4 hours in each treatment group, up to 24 hours

InterventionL/min (Mean)
Full Dose Albuterol Sulfate0.38
Half Dose Albuterol Sulfate0.70
Sterile Saline0.45

[back to top]

Percent Change in Heart Rate (Beats/Min) Between Pre and Post-medication Dosing

Heart rate will be measured before beginning each treatment and again 15-30 min after the conclusion of each treatment phase (4 hours). Therefore there will be 6 pairs of heart rates (12 measures), to determine the change in HR for each treatment group. (NCT02766673)
Timeframe: every 4 hours in each treatment group, up to 24 hours

Intervention% change (Mean)
Full Dose Albuterol Sulfate0.074
Half Dose Albuterol Sulfate0.031
Sterile Saline0.009

[back to top]

Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 8

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 was defined as 23 and 24 hour post-dose FEV1 measurements. All par. in the Intent To Treat (ITT) Population who were not identified as full protocol deviators were included in Per-Protocol (PP) Population. ITT Population, comprised of all randomized subjects, who received at least one dose of study medication. (NCT02799784)
Timeframe: Week 8

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 62.5/25 mcg1.745
Tiotropium/Olodaterol 5/5 mcg1.692

[back to top]

Oxygen Consumption

Oxygen consumption will be measured following for up to 60 minutes beta agonist aerosol (NCT02802111)
Timeframe: 0 to 60 minutes

Interventionmls/kg/min (Median)
Albuterol 5 mg First, Then Levalbuterol 2.5 mg.28
Levalbuterol 2.5 mg First, Then Albuterol 5 mg.27

[back to top]

Heart Rate

Vital signs including heart rate will be measured for up to 60 minutes following beta agonist (NCT02802111)
Timeframe: 0 to 60 minutes

Interventionbeats per minute (Median)
Albuterol 5 mg First, Then Levalbuterol 2.5 mg91
Levalbuterol 2.5 mg First, Then Albuterol 5 mg93

[back to top]

Change in Resting Cardiac Output

Cardiac output was calculated using the direct Fick method of breath-by-breath oxygen consumption (V02)/arterial-venous oxygen content difference (AVO2 diff). (NCT02885636)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 minutes after intervention

InterventionL/min (Mean)
Inhaled Albuterol0.6
Inhaled Saline Placebo0.4

[back to top]

Change in 20 Watt Exercise Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)

The exercise PVR at 20 Watts after study drug relative to the exercise PVR at 20 Watts in the initial assessment prior to study drug. This measurement is made by subtracting pulmonary capillary wedge pressure from the mean pulmonary arterial pressure and dividing by cardiac output in liters per minute and reported as wood units. A decrease in PVR measured by wood units would be considered a favorable response. (NCT02885636)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 minutes after intervention during exercise

Interventionwood units (Mean)
Inhaled Albuterol-0.6
Inhaled Saline Placebo0.1

[back to top]

Change in Exercise Cardiac Output

Cardiac output was calculated using the direct Fick method of breath-by-breath oxygen consumption (V02)/arterial-venous oxygen content difference (AVO2 diff). (NCT02885636)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 minutes after intervention during exercise

InterventionL/min (Mean)
Inhaled Albuterol2.0
Inhaled Saline Placebo0.1

[back to top]

Change in Exercise Pulmonary Artery Compliance

Pulmonary artery compliance was calculated as the ratio of stroke volume/pulmonary artery pulse pressure. (NCT02885636)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 minutes after intervention during exercise

InterventionmL/mm Hg (Mean)
Inhaled Albuterol1.6
Inhaled Saline Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Change in Exercise Pulmonary Artery Pressure

Pulmonary artery pressure was measured using a high-fidelity micromanometer advanced through the lumen of a fluid-filled catheter. (NCT02885636)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 minutes after intervention during exercise

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Inhaled Albuterol-8
Inhaled Saline Placebo-2

[back to top]

Change in Exercise Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP)

Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was measured using a high-fidelity micromanometer advanced through the lumen of a fluid-filled catheter. PCWP position was confirmed by appearance on fluoroscopy, characteristic pressure waveforms, and oximetry. (NCT02885636)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 minutes after intervention during exercise

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Inhaled Albuterol-2
Inhaled Saline Placebo-3

[back to top]

Change in Exercise Pulmonary Elastance

Pulmonary elastance was calculated by the ratio of pulmonary artery systolic pressure/stroke volume. (NCT02885636)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 minutes after intervention during exercise

Interventionmm Hg/mL (Mean)
Inhaled Albuterol-0.17
Inhaled Saline Placebo-0.05

[back to top]

Change in Exercise Right Atrial Pressure (RA)

RA was measured using a high-fidelity micromanometer advanced through the lumen of a fluid-filled catheter. (NCT02885636)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 minutes after intervention during exercise

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Inhaled Albuterol-5
Inhaled Saline Placebo-1

[back to top]

Change in Resting Pulmonary Artery Compliance

Pulmonary artery compliance was calculated as the ratio of stroke volume/pulmonary artery pulse pressure. (NCT02885636)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 minutes after intervention

InterventionmL/mm Hg (Mean)
Inhaled Albuterol1.2
Inhaled Saline Placebo0.7

[back to top]

Change in Resting Pulmonary Artery Pressure

Pulmonary artery pressure was measured using a high-fidelity micromanometer advanced through the lumen of a fluid-filled catheter. (NCT02885636)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 minutes after intervention

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Inhaled Albuterol-5
Inhaled Saline Placebo-3

[back to top]

Change in Resting Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP)

Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was measured using a high-fidelity micromanometer advanced through the lumen of a fluid-filled catheter. PCWP position was confirmed by appearance on fluoroscopy, characteristic pressure waveforms, and oximetry. (NCT02885636)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 minutes after intervention

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Inhaled Albuterol-2
Inhaled Saline Placebo-2

[back to top]

Change in Resting Pulmonary Elastance

Pulmonary elastance was calculated by the ratio of pulmonary artery systolic pressure/stroke volume. (NCT02885636)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 minutes after intervention

Interventionmm Hg/mL (Mean)
Inhaled Albuterol-0.11
Inhaled Saline Placebo-0.03

[back to top]

Change in Resting Pulmonary Vascular Resistance

The resting PVR after study drug relative to the resting PVR in the initial assessment prior to study drug. This measurement is made by subtracting pulmonary capillary wedge pressure from the mean pulmonary arterial pressure and dividing by cardiac output in liters per minute and reported as wood units. (NCT02885636)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 minutes after intervention

Interventionwood units (Mean)
Inhaled Albuterol-0.6
Inhaled Saline Placebo-0.3

[back to top]

Change in Resting Right Atrial Pressure (RA)

RA was measured using a high-fidelity micromanometer advanced through the lumen of a fluid-filled catheter. (NCT02885636)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 minutes after intervention

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Inhaled Albuterol-3
Inhaled Saline Placebo-1

[back to top]

Annualized Rate of Moderate and Severe Asthma Exacerbations

A moderate asthma exacerbation is considered to be a deterioration in asthma symptoms or in lung function, or increased rescue bronchodilator use lasting for at least 2 days or more, but not be severe enough to warrant systemic corticosteroid use (or a doubling or more of the maintenance systemic corticosteroid dose, if applicable) for 3 days or more and/or hospitalization. It is an event that, when recognized, should result in a temporary change in treatment, to prevent it from becoming severe. A severe asthma exacerbation is defined as the deterioration of asthma requiring the use of systemic corticosteroids (tablets,suspension or injection), or an increase from a stable maintenance dose (For participants receiving maintenance systemic corticosteroids, at least double the maintenance systemic corticosteroid dose for at least 3 days is required), for at least 3 days or an inpatient hospitalization or emergency department visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionExacerbations per year (Mean)
FF/VI0.70
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 31.25 mcg)0.68
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 62.5 mcg)0.61

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

Twelve-lead ECGs were performed during the study using an automated ECG machine. All ECG measurements were made with the participant in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. The number of participants with worst case post-Baseline abnormal ECG findings were reported. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
FF/VI 100/25 mcg115
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg118
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg109
FF/VI 200/25 mcg109
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg106
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg108

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 (ACQ-7) Total Score at Week 24

The ACQ-7 consists of 7 attributes of asthma control, of which 6 to be self-completed by participant in a 6-item questionnaire, enquire about frequency and/or severity of symptoms over the previous week on: nocturnal awakening, symptoms on waking in the morning, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheeze, and rescue medication use. The seventh attribute measures the lung function, which was included via pre-bronchodilator FEV1 % predicted value. All 7 items of ACQ have response on 0-6 ordinal scale (0=no impairment/limitation, 6=total impairment/limitation). The total score is calculated as the average of all non-missing item responses, ranges from 0 to 6. Higher score indicates worst symptoms. Treatment policy estimand was assessed, including all on- and post-treatment data. Baseline value was at randomization visit (pre-dose,Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as value at Week 24 minus Baseline value. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and Week 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/VI-0.678
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 31.25 mcg)-0.734
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 62.5 mcg)-0.767

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Common (>=3%) Non-SAE

Adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, events associated with liver injury and impaired liver function, or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment were categorized as SAE. Number of participants with any SAE and common (>=3%) non-SAEs are presented. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Common non-SAESAE
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg15018
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg13523
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg12723
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg12221
FF/VI 100/25 mcg13625
FF/VI 200/25 mcg12221

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology Values

Blood samples were collected for assessment of hematology parameters, which included Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Erythrocytes, Hematocrit, Hemoglobin, Leukocytes, Platelets, Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH) and Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV). Abnormal laboratory results are categorized as high or low with respect to their normal ranges. Participants having High and Low values from normal ranges for any parameter at any time post-baseline visits are presented. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Basophils, low, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Basophils, high, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Eosinophils, low, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Eosinophils, high, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Lymphocytes, low, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Lymphocytes, high, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Monocytes, low, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Monocytes, high, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Neutrophils, low, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Neutrophils, high, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Erythrocytes, low, n=391,390,392,391,391,397Erythrocytes, high, n=391,390,392,391,391,397Hematocrit, low, n=391,390,392,391,391,397Hematocrit, high, n=391,390,392,391,391,397Hemoglobin, low, n=391,390,392,391,391,397Hemoglobin, high, n=391,390,392,391,391,397Leukocytes, low, n=391,390,391,389,391,396Leukocytes, high, n=391,390,391,389,391,396Platelets, low, n=391,388,389,391,388,396Platelets, high, n=391,388,389,391,388,396MCH, low, n=391,390,392,391,391,397MCH, high, n=391,390,392,391,391,397MCV, low, n=391,390,392,391,391,397MCV, high, n=391,390,392,391,391,397
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg0027841156811020162128524713122921647322241
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg0025102131574161511131650408142031924221025
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg0032851365171215211720493710122651941251926
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg00287810663493422172649341384042125321437
FF/VI 100/25 mcg0126111132607142114242160321493841740182029
FF/VI 200/25 mcg00318487642101915122047401793142134171529

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Chemistry Values

Blood samples were collected for assessment of clinical chemistry parameters, which included albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, calcium, creatinine, glucose, potassium, protein, sodium and urea. Abnormal laboratory results are categorized as high or low with respect to their normal ranges. Participants having High and Low values from normal ranges for any parameter at any time post-baseline visits are presented. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Albumin, lowAlbumin, highALT, lowALT, highAST, lowAST, highALP, lowALP, highDirect bilirubin, lowDirect bilirubin, highBilirubin, lowBilirubin, highCalcium, lowCalcium, highCreatinine, lowCreatinine, highGlucose, lowGlucose, highPotassium, lowPotassium, highProtein, lowProtein, highSodium, lowSodium, highUrea, lowUrea, high
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg060290270150101291262711713130177417
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg0502401401000057104981170111533753
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg03027023116020174860912667121375311
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg0103001601201013376487736192137113
FF/VI 100/25 mcg2104102912101094454715742153056313
FF/VI 200/25 mcg1202802101202015711636776793254311

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic FEV1 at 3 Hours Post Study Treatment at Week 24

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal volume of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Baseline value is the last acceptable/borderline acceptable pre-dose FEV1 prior to randomized treatment start date (pre-dose at Day 1). Change from Baseline value is the value at Week 24 (recorded at 3 hours post dose) minus the Baseline value. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and 3 hours post dose at Week 24

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
FF/VI 100/25 mcg0.132
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg0.220
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg0.243
FF/VI 200/25 mcg0.168
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg0.256
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg0.286

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS) Total Score Over Weeks 21 to 24 (Inclusive) of the Treatment Period

The E-RS in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) consists of 11 items. E-RS captures information related to respiratory symptoms, i.e. breathlessness, cough, sputum production, chest congestion and chest tightness. The E-RS was completed daily and data was derived by 4-weekly intervals, requiring at least 50% of data to be present during a period. 7 items are scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extreme) and 4 items are scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (extreme). The E-RS total score was calculated by taking sum of all the items. The E-RS total score has a scoring range of 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating more severe respiratory symptoms. Treatment policy estimand was assessed, including all on- and post-treatment data. Baseline value was the mean value of 14 days prior to randomization. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-baseline value (mean of daily E-RS total scores during Week 21 to 24 ) minus Baseline value. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (14 days prior to randomization) and Weeks 21 to 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/VI-2.47
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 31.25 mcg)-2.60
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 62.5 mcg)-2.89

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 24

Pulse Rate was measured in the sitting position after approximately 5 minutes rest. Baseline value is the last acceptable/borderline acceptable value prior to randomized treatment start date (pre-dose at Day 1). Change from Baseline value is the value at the clinic visit minus the Baseline value. Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points; thus, overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in ITT Population without missing covariate information, with Baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and Week 24

InterventionBeats per minute (Least Squares Mean)
FF/VI 100/25 mcg-1.1
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg0.2
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg-1.0
FF/VI 200/25 mcg-0.7
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg-1.3
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-0.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 24

The SGRQ had 50 questions (scored from 0 to 100 where 0 indicates best and 100 indicates worst health) designed to measure quality of life (QoL) of participants with airway obstruction, measuring symptoms, impact, and activity. The questions are designed to be self-completed by the participant with a recall over the past 3 months. SGRQ total score was calculated by summing the pre-assigned weights of answers, dividing by the sum of the maximum weights for items in SGRQ and multiplying by 100. SGRQ total score ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 indicates best and 100 indicates worst health. A change of 4 points is considered a clinically relevant change. Treatment policy estimand was assessed, including all on- and post-treatment data. Baseline value was at randomization visit (pre-dose at Day 1). Change from Baseline value is the value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and Week 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/VI-11.39
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 31.25 mcg)-10.29
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 62.5 mcg)-11.69

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 24

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal volume of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 on treatment is defined as the highest FEV1 value obtained prior to the morning dose of investigational product. Baseline value is the last acceptable/borderline acceptable pre-dose FEV1 prior to randomized treatment start date (pre-dose at Day 1). Change from Baseline value is the value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population comprised of all randomized participants, excluding those who were randomized in error, who did not receive the study drug. Treatment policy estimand was assessed, including all on- and post-treatment data. Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points; thus, overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in ITT Population without missing covariate information, with Baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement. Mixed Model Repeated Measures(MMRM) was used. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and Week 24

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
FF/VI 100/25 mcg0.024
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg0.120
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg0.134
FF/VI 200/25 mcg0.076
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg0.157
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg0.168

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 24

Blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) was measured in the sitting position after approximately 5 minutes rest. Baseline value is the last acceptable/borderline acceptable value prior to randomized treatment start date (pre-dose at Day 1). Change from Baseline value is the value at the clinic visit minus the Baseline value. Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points; thus, overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in ITT Population without missing covariate information, with Baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and Week 24

,,,,,
InterventionMillimeter of mercury (Least Squares Mean)
SBPDBP
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg0.60.1
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg1.11.3
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg0.80.2
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg0.90.8
FF/VI 100/25 mcg1.60.4
FF/VI 200/25 mcg0.20.4

[back to top]

Number of Albuterol Uses in the 24 Hours Preceding a Severe CAE

Severe CAE was defined as a CAE that involved worsening asthma such that the treating physician elected to administer prednisone (or equivalent glucocorticoid treatment) at least 10 mg prednisone equivalent above Baseline, for at least 3 days; and an unscheduled provider visit such as an office visit, urgent care visit, emergency care visit, or hospitalization. Number of albuterol inhalations used in the 24 hours preceeding a severe CAE is reported. (NCT02969408)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventioninhalations (Mean)
ABS eMDPI5.9

[back to top]

Clinical Asthma Exacerbation (CAE) Rate: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least 1 Moderate or Severe CAE

"CAE was an occurrence of either severe CAE or moderate CAE. Severe CAE was defined as a CAE that involved worsening asthma such that the treating physician elected to administer prednisone (or equivalent glucocorticoid treatment) at least 10 milligrams (mg) prednisone equivalent above Baseline, for at least 3 days; and an unscheduled provider visit such as an office visit, urgent care visit, emergency care visit, or hospitalization.~Moderate CAE was defined as a CAE that involved worsening asthma such that the treating physician elected to administer prednisone (or equivalent glucocorticoid treatment) at least 10 mg prednisone equivalent above Baseline, for at least 3 days, or an unscheduled provider visit such as an office visit, urgent care visit, emergency care visit, or hospitalization associated with an increase in asthma therapy that did not qualify for severe CAE as defined above." (NCT02969408)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ABS eMDPI17

[back to top]

Number of Days Prior to the Peak of a Severe CAE When Albuterol Use Increased

Severe CAE was defined as a CAE that involved worsening asthma such that the treating physician elected to administer prednisone (or equivalent glucocorticoid treatment) at least 10 mg prednisone equivalent above Baseline, for at least 3 days; and an unscheduled provider visit such as an office visit, urgent care visit, emergency care visit, or hospitalization. Number of days prior to the peak of a severe CAE when albuterol use first increased to greater than (>) 4, >12, and >20 inhalations was reported. Participants were counted in more than 1 category (that is, all of the >20 inhalation participants were also counted in the >12 category, and in the >4 category). (NCT02969408)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventiondays (Mean)
Albuterol use >4 inhalationsAlbuterol use >12 inhalationsAlbuterol use >20 inhalations
ABS eMDPI39.340.334.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by investigator. SAEs included death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized the participant and required medical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed in this definition. A summary of serious and non-serious AEs regardless of causality is located in 'Reported Adverse Events module'. (NCT02969408)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AEsSevere AEsTreatment-related AEsTreatment-related severe AESerious AEsAEs leading to discontinuation from studyCAE related AEsDevice-related AEsAEs leading to death
ABS eMDPI1274120627330

[back to top]

Total Number of Inhalations in the Days Preceding the Peak of a Severe CAE

Severe CAE was defined as a CAE that involved worsening asthma such that the treating physician elected to administer prednisone (or equivalent glucocorticoid treatment) at least 10 mg prednisone equivalent above Baseline, for at least 3 days; and an unscheduled provider visit such as an office visit, urgent care visit, emergency care visit, or hospitalization. Total number of inhalations taken in 1 day (that is, the 24-hour period on the day prior to the date of the CAE symptom peak) and at 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, and 21 days preceding the date of the severe CAE symptom peak were reported. (NCT02969408)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventioninhalations (Mean)
Day 1 prior to CAEDay 3 prior to CAEDay 5 prior to CAEDay 7 prior to CAEDay 10 prior to CAEDay 14 prior to CAEDay 21 prior to CAE
ABS eMDPI5.96.13.64.04.53.24.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With On-treatment Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECG) Findings

A single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip was recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry at given time points. All ECG measurements were measured with participants in supine position after >=5 minutes rest. All ECGs were electronically transmitted to an independent and treatment-blinded cardiologist for the measurement. ECG was obtained 15 minutes to 45 minutes after the administration of study treatment. Data for number of participants with abnormal ECG Findings have been reported. (NCT03012061)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 24

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 4, n=139, 135, 138Week 24, n=133, 129, 129
Placebo QD2326
UMEC 31.25 mcg QD2623
UMEC 62.5 mcg QD3539

[back to top]

Number of Participants With On-treatment Adverse Events (AE), Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAE)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment or all events of possible drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinemia were categorized as SAE. Number of participants with on-treatment AEs and SAEs and serious adverse events (SAE) and common (>=3%)non-SAEs have been reported. (NCT03012061)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AEAny SAEAny non-SAE
Placebo QD65539
UMEC 31.25 mcg QD73447
UMEC 62.5 mcg QD57333

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic FEV1 at 3 Hours Post Dose at Week 24

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. The highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements were recorded at each Visit. The Baseline value of clinic FEV1 was the last acceptable/borderline acceptable (pre-dose) FEV1 value obtained prior to randomization (either from Visit 2 pre-dose or from Visit 1 pre-bronchodilator). Change from Baseline was calculated as FEV1 value at Week 24 (recorded at 3 hours post dose) minus FEV1 value at Baseline. The analysis only including data collected on-treatment. LS mean change and SE data is presented. (NCT03012061)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Week 24

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo QD0.1768
UMEC 31.25 mcg QD0.3663
UMEC 62.5 mcg QD0.3744

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 24

FEV1 is measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. The highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements were recorded at each Visit. The Baseline value of clinic FEV1 was last acceptable/borderline acceptable (pre-dose) FEV1 value obtained prior to randomized treatment start date. Change from Baseline was calculated as FEV1 value at Week 24 minus FEV1 value at Baseline. Treatment policy estimand was assessed, including all on- and post-treatment data. Intent-to-Treat Population comprised all randomized participants, excluding those who were randomized in error, who did not receive the study drug. Least square (LS) mean and standard error (SE) data is presented. Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points; thus, overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in ITT Population without missing covariate information, with Baseline, at least one post-Baseline measurement. (NCT03012061)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Week 24

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo QD0.1289
UMEC 31.25 mcg QD0.3046
UMEC 62.5 mcg QD0.3130

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in On-treatment Pulse Rate

Pulse rate was measured at every clinic visit, starting at Visit 1, and prior to conducting spirometry. Pulse rate was measured with participant in sitting position after approximately 5 minutes rest. Baseline value was defined as the latest vital signs assessment prior to randomized treatment start, including unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the value at specified time point. LS mean and SE data is presented. (NCT03012061)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose), Weeks 4, 12 and 24

,,
InterventionBeats per minute (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4, n=139, 137, 139Week 12, n=139, 133, 135Week 24, n=135, 131, 130
Placebo QD-2.3-0.9-1.8
UMEC 31.25 mcg QD-1.0-0.3-0.7
UMEC 62.5 mcg QD-0.80.81.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in On-treatment Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

Blood pressure was measured at every clinic visit, starting at Visit 1, and prior to conducting spirometry. Blood pressure was measured with participant in sitting position after approximately 5 minutes rest. Baseline value was defined as the latest vital signs assessment prior to randomized treatment start, including unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the value at specified time point. LS mean and SE data is presented. Different participants may have data available at different time points; thus, the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population without missing covariate information and with a Baseline and at least one post-Baseline measurement. (NCT03012061)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose), Weeks 4, 12 and 24

,,
InterventionMillimeters of mercury (Least Squares Mean)
SBP, Week 4, n=139, 137, 139SBP, Week 12, n=139, 133, 135SBP, Week 24, n=135, 131, 130DBP, Week 4, n=139, 137, 139DBP, Week 12, n=139, 133, 135DBP, Week 24, n=135, 131, 130
Placebo QD-0.70.3-0.60.40.7-0.1
UMEC 31.25 mcg QD1.1-0.21.11.20.21.6
UMEC 62.5 mcg QD0.30.6-0.10.61.81.4

[back to top]

Total Number of Healthcare Visits

Determine differences in healthcare visits which include all-cause and respiratory related, acute care outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations between groups (NCT03137303)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Emergency room visit72551318Emergency room visit72551317Hospitalization72551317Hospitalization72551318Acute outpatient visit72551318Acute outpatient visit72551317Routine primary care visits72551317Routine primary care visits72551318New diagnostic tests72551318New diagnostic tests72551317
NoMissingYes
Patient Subject Usual Care111
Patient-Subject Intervention76
Patient Subject Usual Care119
Patient-Subject Intervention93
Patient Subject Usual Care1
Patient Subject Usual Care48
Patient-Subject Intervention17
Patient Subject Usual Care182
Patient-Subject Intervention152
Patient Subject Usual Care61
Patient-Subject Intervention35
Patient Subject Usual Care169
Patient-Subject Intervention134
Patient Subject Usual Care198
Patient-Subject Intervention138
Patient Subject Usual Care32
Patient-Subject Intervention31
Patient-Subject Intervention2
Patient Subject Usual Care126
Patient-Subject Intervention72
Patient Subject Usual Care104
Patient-Subject Intervention97

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Eosinophils/Leukocytes

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: Eosinophils/Leukocytes. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, 24 and 52

,,
InterventionPercentage of eosinophils in leukocytes (Mean)
Week 12, n=47,9,55Week 24, n=46,9,52Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg-0.35-0.130.58
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-0.181.680.01
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-0.870.190.13

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Calcium, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Urea

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: calcium, glucose, potassium, sodium and urea. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, 24 and 52

,,
InterventionMillimoles per liter (Mean)
Calcium: Week 12, n=47,9,55Calcium: Week 24, n=46,9,52Calcium: Week 52, n=46,8,51Glucose: Week 12, n=47,9,55Glucose: Week 24, n=46,9,52Glucose: Week 52, n=46,8,51Potassium: Week 12, n=47,9,55Potassium: Week 24, n=46,9,52Potassium: Week 52, n=46,8,51Sodium: Week 12, n=47,9,55Sodium: Week 24, n=46,9,52Sodium: Week 52, n=46,8,51Urea: Week 12, n=47,9,55Urea: Week 24, n=46,9,52Urea: Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg0.0021-0.00160.01250.03430.12550.0567-0.01-0.010.03-0.2-0.5-0.4-0.1162-0.5301-0.2398
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-0.0083-0.00550.0000-0.03700.02470.1804-0.070.070.04-0.3-1.0-0.8-0.9282-1.3328-0.4641
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-0.02450.00430.03130.16050.27010.1099-0.04-0.060.03-0.1-0.3-0.20.1889-0.2018-0.0224

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Urinalysis Results Relative to Baseline

Urine samples were collected for analysis of presence of occult blood and protein in urine using dipstick method. The dipstick test gives results in a semi-quantitative manner, and results for urinalysis parameter of occult blood and protein can be read as Trace, 1+, 2+ and 3+ indicating proportional concentrations in the urine sample. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Occult Blood; No Change/DecreasedOccult Blood; Increase to TraceOccult Blood; Increase to 1+Occult Blood; Increase to 2+Occult Blood; Increase to 3+Protein; No Change/DecreasedProtein; Increase to TraceProtein; Increase to 1+Protein; Increase to 2+Protein; Increase to 3+
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg3912233210500
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg7001171010
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg4404343414520

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: hemoglobin. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, 24 and 52

,,
InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Week 12, n=47,9,55Week 24, n=46,9,52Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg-2.6-2.0-0.4
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-2.40.21.4
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-1.3-1.50.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: bilirubin, creatinine and direct bilirubin. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, 24 and 52

,,
InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
Bilirubin: Week 12, n=47,9,55Bilirubin: Week 24, n=46,9,52Bilirubin: Week 52, n=46,8,51Creatinine: Week 12, n=47,9,55Creatinine: Week 24, n=46,9,52Creatinine: Week 52, n=46,8,51Direct bilirubin: Week 12, n=47,9,55Direct bilirubin: Week 24, n=46,9,52Direct bilirubin: Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg0.7640.9670.2230.37622.11390.69180.1820.149-0.223
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg2.8503.0402.7790.3929-0.4911-0.77350.9501.1400.641
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg1.213-0.2300.0001.26970.98600.95330.155-0.329-0.101

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Albumin, Protein

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: albumin and protein. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, 24 and 52

,,
InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Albumin: Week 12, n=47,9,55Albumin: Week 24, n=46,9,52Albumin: Week 52, n=46,8,51Protein: Week 12, n=47,9,55Protein: Week 24, n=46,9,52Protein: Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg0.2-0.3-0.2-0.2-1.4-0.6
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg0.4-0.1-0.9-0.1-0.7-1.4
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg0.1-0.3-0.6-0.1-0.8-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase and aspartate aminotransferase. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, 24 and 52

,,
InterventionInternational units per liter (Mean)
Alanine aminotransferase: Week 12, n=47,9,55Alanine aminotransferase: Week 24, n=46,9,52Alanine aminotransferase: Week 52, n=46,8,51Alkaline phosphatase: Week 12, n=47,9,55Alkaline phosphatase: Week 24, n=46,9,52Alkaline phosphatase: Week 52, n=46,8,51Aspartate aminotransferase: Week 12, n=47,9,55Aspartate aminotransferase: Week 24, n=46,9,52Aspartate aminotransferase: Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg-0.0-1.5-2.31.0-4.32.3-0.4-2.0-2.1
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-2.1-0.4-1.12.02.6-7.9-0.60.60.3
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-1.50.31.4-13.2-8.1-7.2-1.3-0.00.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: hematocrit. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, 24 and 52

,,
InterventionPercentage of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
Week 12, n=47,9,55Week 24, n=46,9,52Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg-0.0102-0.0100-0.0011
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-0.0103-0.00290.0034
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-0.0061-0.00630.0001

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, 24 and 52

,,
InterventionFemtoliters (Mean)
Week 12, n=47,9,55Week 24, n=46,9,52Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg-0.550.350.21
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg0.901.491.76
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-0.200.690.55

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Lymphocytes/Leukocytes

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: Lymphocytes/Leukocytes. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, 24 and 52

,,
InterventionPercentage of lymphocytes in leukocytes (Mean)
Week 12, n=47,9,55Week 24, n=46,9,52Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg-1.77-0.75-0.26
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-0.12-3.20-0.07
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-0.95-2.06-1.54

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Monocytes/Leukocytes

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: Monocytes/Leukocytes. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, 24 and 52

,,
InterventionPercentage of monocytes in leukocytes (Mean)
Week 12, n=47,9,55Week 24, n=46,9,52Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg-0.48-0.490.14
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg0.030.20-0.19
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-0.340.17-0.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Neutrophils/Leukocytes

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: Neutrophils/Leukocytes. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, 24 and 52

,,
InterventionPercentage of neutrophils in leukocytes (Mean)
Week 12, n=47,9,55Week 24, n=46,9,52Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg2.591.36-0.56
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg0.301.360.24
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg2.261.761.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, 24 and 52

,,
InterventionPicograms (Mean)
Week 12, n=47,9,55Week 24, n=46,9,52Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg-0.040.410.07
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg0.490.760.66
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg0.090.350.22

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Platelet Count

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: platelet count. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, 24 and 52

,,
Intervention10^9 cells per liter (Mean)
Week 12, n=47,9,55Week 24, n=46,9,52Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg3.83.1-2.8
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-17.7-20.6-18.4
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg4.84.63.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PR Interval and QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate According to Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)

Single 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) were obtained using an automated ECG machine that measured PR Interval and QTcF Interval. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 24 and 52

,,
InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
PR Interval: Week 4, n=47,9,55PR Interval: Week 24, n=46,9,52PR Interval: Week 52, n=46,8,50QTcF Interval: Week 4, n=47,9,55QTcF Interval: Week 24, n=46,9,52QTcF Interval: Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg-2.31.5-1.3-1.890-1.5771.745
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg5.1-0.41.31.7577.5783.243
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-0.32.51.73.914-3.2650.969

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate

Pulse rate was measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest for participants at indicated time points. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

,,
InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Week 4, n=47,9,55Week 12, n=47,9,55Week 24, n=46,9,52Week 36, n=46,8,52Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg0.3-0.1-2.62.4-0.3
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg5.94.44.67.0-1.4
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg1.62.3-1.84.21.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

Blood pressure was measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest for participants at indicated time points. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

,,
InterventionMillimeters of mercury (Mean)
SBP: Week 4, n=47,9,55SBP: Week 12, n=47,9,55SBP: Week 24, n=46,9,52SBP: Week 36, n=46,8,52SBP: Week 52, n=46,8,51DBP: Week 4, n=47,9,55DBP: Week 12, n=47,9,55DBP: Week 24, n=46,9,52DBP: Week 36, n=46,8,52DBP: Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg-1.9-1.7-0.92.00.11.6-0.10.44.22.1
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg7.41.2-1.05.03.63.3-0.21.64.82.4
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg2.74.63.34.63.4-0.21.72.13.12.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: result in death, life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, other important medical events that may jeopardize the participant or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcome mentioned before. Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Population comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment in the treatment period. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Non-SAEsSAEs
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg231
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg70
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg322

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Basophils/Leukocytes

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: Basophils/Leukocytes. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, 24 and 52

,,
InterventionPercentage of basophil in leukocytes (Mean)
Week 12, n=47,9,55Week 24, n=46,9,52Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg0.010.020.10
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-0.03-0.030.01
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-0.10-0.050.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as relevant visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03184987)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, 24 and 52

,,
Intervention10^12 cells per liter (Mean)
Week 12, n=47,9,55Week 24, n=46,9,52Week 52, n=46,8,51
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg-0.084-0.123-0.024
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg to FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-0.161-0.109-0.055
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-0.056-0.101-0.032

[back to top]

Number of Albuterol Uses in the 24 Hours Preceding a CE-COPD

CE-COPD referred to occurrence of moderate or severe CE-COPD. Severe CE-COPD was defined as an event that involved worsening respiratory symptoms for at least 2 consecutive days requiring treatment with SCS (at least 10 mg prednisone equivalent above baseline) and/or systemic antibiotics and a hospitalization for CE COPD. Moderate CE-COPD was defined as an event that involved worsening respiratory symptoms for at least 2 consecutive days requiring treatment with SCS (at least 10 mg prednisone equivalent above baseline), and/or systemic antibiotics, and an unscheduled encounter (such as a phone call, an office visit, an urgent care visit, or an emergency care visit) for a CE-COPD, but not a hospitalization. Number of albuterol inhalations used in the 24 hours preceding a moderate or severe CE-COPD was reported. (NCT03256695)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventioninhalations/24 hours (Mean)
ABS eMDPI3.7

[back to top]

Number of Days Prior to the Symptom Peak of a CE-COPD Event When Albuterol Use Increased

CE-COPD: occurrence of moderate or severe CE-COPD. Severe CE-COPD: an event that involved worsening respiratory symptoms for at least 2 consecutive days requiring treatment with SCS (at least 10 mg prednisone equivalent above baseline) and/or systemic antibiotics and a hospitalization. Moderate CE-COPD: an event that involved worsening respiratory symptoms for at least 2 consecutive days requiring treatment with SCS (at least 10 mg prednisone equivalent above baseline), and/or systemic antibiotics, and an unscheduled encounter (such as a phone call, an office visit, an urgent care visit, or an emergency care visit), but not a hospitalization. Number of days of increased albuterol use prior to the symptom peak of a CE-COPD was reported for first increase of daily albuterol use; 2 and 4 inhalations in a single day from baseline. increased daily albuterol use was defined as single-day increase of greater than (>) 20 percent (%) from baseline. (NCT03256695)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventiondays (Mean)
Days from albuterol use >20% increase to CE-COPDDays from 2 inhalations increase to CE-COPDDays from 4 inhalations increase to CE-COPD
ABS eMDPI32.731.230.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by investigator. SAEs included death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized the participant and required medical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed in this definition. A summary of serious and non-serious AEs regardless of causality is located in 'Reported Adverse Events module'. (NCT03256695)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AEsSevere AEsTreatment-related AEsTreatment-related severe AESerious AEsAEs leading to discontinuation from studyCE-COPD related AEsDevice-related AEsAEs leading to death
ABS eMDPI190432044811802

[back to top]

Total Number of Albuterol Inhalations in the Days Preceding the Symptom Peak of a CE-COPD Event

Severe CE-COPD: an event that involved worsening respiratory symptoms for at least 2 consecutive days requiring treatment with SCS (at least 10 mg prednisone equivalent above baseline) and/or systemic antibiotics and a hospitalization. Moderate CE-COPD: an event that involved worsening respiratory symptoms for at least 2 consecutive days requiring treatment with SCS (at least 10 mg prednisone equivalent above baseline), and/or systemic antibiotics, and an unscheduled encounter (such as a phone call, office visit, urgent care visit, or emergency care visit), but not a hospitalization. Total number of inhalations taken in 1 day(24-hour period on day prior to date of CE-COPD symptom peak) and at 3,5,7,10,14, and 21 days preceding the date of CE-COPD symptom peak were reported. If a participant experienced multiple CE-COPD events, number of inhalations preceding symptom peak of a subsequent event was counted since end of previous event. Average of inhalations of all events were presented. (NCT03256695)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventioninhalations (Mean)
Day 1 prior to CE-COPD symptom peakDay 3 prior to CE-COPD symptom peakDay 5 prior to CE-COPD symptom peakDay 7 prior to CE-COPD symptom peakDay 10 prior to CE-COPD symptom peakDay 14 prior to CE-COPD symptom peakDay 21 prior to CE-COPD symptom peak
ABS eMDPI3.73.54.23.43.23.43.1

[back to top]

Clinical Exacerbation of COPD (CE-COPD) Rate: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least 1 Moderate or Severe CE-COPD

"CE-COPD was an occurrence of either severe CE-COPD or moderate CE-COPD. Severe CE-COPD was defined as an event that involved worsening respiratory symptoms for at least 2 consecutive days requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids (SCS; at least 10 milligrams [mg] prednisone equivalent above baseline) and/or systemic antibiotics and a hospitalization for CE COPD.~Moderate CE-COPD was defined as an event that involved worsening respiratory symptoms for at least 2 consecutive days requiring treatment with SCS (at least 10 mg prednisone equivalent above baseline), and/or systemic antibiotics, and an unscheduled encounter (such as a phone call, an office visit, an urgent care visit, or an emergency care visit) for a CE-COPD, but not a hospitalization." (NCT03256695)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ABS eMDPI28

[back to top]

Change in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)

Change in PVR will be measured using echocardiogram (NCT03270332)
Timeframe: Baseline, up to 30 minutes after inhalation

Interventiondyn.s.cm-5 (Mean)
Albuterol Group217
Placebo Group108

[back to top]

Change in Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure (MPAP)

Change in MPAP will be measured using echocardiogram (NCT03270332)
Timeframe: Baseline, up to 30 minutes after inhalation

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Albuterol Group6.5
Placebo Group4.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Presence of Ketones, Glucose, Occult Blood, and Protein

Urine samples were collected to analyze presence of ketones, occult blood, glucose, and protein in urine. In this dipstick test, the level of occult blood, glucose, ketones and urine protein in urine samples were recorded as negative, trace, 1+ and 2+ indicating proportional concentrations in urine. Only categories with abnormal significant values have been presented. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Occult blood, Trace,Week 4,n=2,1,1,5,0,1Urine Ketone, Trace,Day 2,n=1,2,0,2,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 1,n=2,1,1,3,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 4,n=2,1,1,5,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 18,n=2,1,0,1,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 24,n=1,1,0,4,0,0Urine Protein, 2+, Week 4,n=2,1,1,5,0,1Urine Protein, Trace, Week 18,n=2,1,0,1,0,0
GSK3511294 2mg00000000

[back to top]

Ratio to Baseline in Absolute Blood Eosinophil Count

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points. Analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis (MMRM) model on log-transformed data with fixed categorical effects of treatment, planned timepoint and treatment-by-planned timepoint interaction and fixed continuous covariates of log Baseline blood eosinophil count and log Baseline blood eosinophil count-by-planned timepoint interaction. Baseline is defined as the latest predose non-missing blood eosinophil count. Ratio to Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value divided by Baseline value. Pharmacodynamic Population included participants in the 'Safety' population for whom a post-dose pharmacodynamic (ie blood eosinophil) sample was obtained and analyzed. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 2, 3, 4, 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36, and 40

,
InterventionRatio of eosinophils in blood (Least Squares Mean)
Day 2, n=12, 6, 6, 8, 9, 6Day 3, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Day 4, n=12, 6, 6, 8, 8, 6Day 5, n=11, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 1, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 5Week 2, n=12, 6, 5, 9, 9, 6Week 4,n=12, 6, 5, 9, 9, 6Week 8, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 12, n=12, 5, 6, 9, 9, 5Week 18, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 24, n=11, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 26, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 32, n=6, 6, 6, 0, 0, 6
GSK3511294 10mg0.5220.3500.3400.2670.2230.2250.1950.1290.1710.3140.5630.6630.837
GSK3511294 2mg0.5620.4310.4000.3000.3040.2740.1980.2010.3730.4660.6610.7760.968

[back to top]

Ratio to Baseline in Absolute Blood Eosinophil Count

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points. Analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis (MMRM) model on log-transformed data with fixed categorical effects of treatment, planned timepoint and treatment-by-planned timepoint interaction and fixed continuous covariates of log Baseline blood eosinophil count and log Baseline blood eosinophil count-by-planned timepoint interaction. Baseline is defined as the latest predose non-missing blood eosinophil count. Ratio to Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value divided by Baseline value. Pharmacodynamic Population included participants in the 'Safety' population for whom a post-dose pharmacodynamic (ie blood eosinophil) sample was obtained and analyzed. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 2, 3, 4, 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36, and 40

,
InterventionRatio of eosinophils in blood (Least Squares Mean)
Day 2, n=12, 6, 6, 8, 9, 6Day 3, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Day 4, n=12, 6, 6, 8, 8, 6Day 5, n=11, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 1, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 5Week 2, n=12, 6, 5, 9, 9, 6Week 4,n=12, 6, 5, 9, 9, 6Week 8, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 12, n=12, 5, 6, 9, 9, 5Week 18, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 24, n=11, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 26, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 36, n=6, 0, 0, 9, 9, 0
GSK3511294 100mg0.4960.2620.2500.2800.2370.2140.1850.1260.1610.1390.1490.1990.374
GSK3511294 30mg0.4340.2810.2150.2190.2260.1700.1310.1020.1230.1520.2850.3170.858

[back to top]

Ratio to Baseline in Absolute Blood Eosinophil Count

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points. Analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis (MMRM) model on log-transformed data with fixed categorical effects of treatment, planned timepoint and treatment-by-planned timepoint interaction and fixed continuous covariates of log Baseline blood eosinophil count and log Baseline blood eosinophil count-by-planned timepoint interaction. Baseline is defined as the latest predose non-missing blood eosinophil count. Ratio to Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value divided by Baseline value. Pharmacodynamic Population included participants in the 'Safety' population for whom a post-dose pharmacodynamic (ie blood eosinophil) sample was obtained and analyzed. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 2, 3, 4, 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36, and 40

InterventionRatio of eosinophils in blood (Least Squares Mean)
Day 2, n=12, 6, 6, 8, 9, 6Day 3, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Day 4, n=12, 6, 6, 8, 8, 6Day 5, n=11, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 1, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 5Week 2, n=12, 6, 5, 9, 9, 6Week 4,n=12, 6, 5, 9, 9, 6Week 8, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 12, n=12, 5, 6, 9, 9, 5Week 18, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 24, n=11, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 26, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 32, n=6, 6, 6, 0, 0, 6Week 40, n=2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 6
GSK3511294 300mg0.4660.4030.3600.2990.2500.2650.1800.1780.1640.1790.2020.1860.2100.258

[back to top]

Ratio to Baseline in Absolute Blood Eosinophil Count

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points. Analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis (MMRM) model on log-transformed data with fixed categorical effects of treatment, planned timepoint and treatment-by-planned timepoint interaction and fixed continuous covariates of log Baseline blood eosinophil count and log Baseline blood eosinophil count-by-planned timepoint interaction. Baseline is defined as the latest predose non-missing blood eosinophil count. Ratio to Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value divided by Baseline value. Pharmacodynamic Population included participants in the 'Safety' population for whom a post-dose pharmacodynamic (ie blood eosinophil) sample was obtained and analyzed. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 2, 3, 4, 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36, and 40

InterventionRatio of eosinophils in blood (Least Squares Mean)
Day 2, n=12, 6, 6, 8, 9, 6Day 3, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Day 4, n=12, 6, 6, 8, 8, 6Day 5, n=11, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 1, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 5Week 2, n=12, 6, 5, 9, 9, 6Week 4,n=12, 6, 5, 9, 9, 6Week 8, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 12, n=12, 5, 6, 9, 9, 5Week 18, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 24, n=11, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 26, n=12, 6, 6, 9, 9, 6Week 32, n=6, 6, 6, 0, 0, 6Week 36, n=6, 0, 0, 9, 9, 0Week 40, n=2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 6
Placebo1.0830.9771.0080.9271.1361.1741.0621.0951.0311.0791.0051.1190.9120.9751.210

[back to top]

Urine Potential of Hydrogen (pH) Analysis by Dipstick Method

Urinary pH measurement is a routine part of urinalysis. Urine pH is an acid-base measurement. pH is measured on a numeric scale ranging from 0 to 14; values on the scale refer to the degree of alkalinity or acidity. A pH of 7 is neutral. A pH less than 7 is acidic, and a pH greater than 7 is basic. Normal urine has a slightly acid pH (5.0 - 6.0). (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionpH (Mean)
Week 4,n=3,1,1,5,0,1
GSK3511294 300mg5.00

[back to top]

Urine Potential of Hydrogen (pH) Analysis by Dipstick Method

Urinary pH measurement is a routine part of urinalysis. Urine pH is an acid-base measurement. pH is measured on a numeric scale ranging from 0 to 14; values on the scale refer to the degree of alkalinity or acidity. A pH of 7 is neutral. A pH less than 7 is acidic, and a pH greater than 7 is basic. Normal urine has a slightly acid pH (5.0 - 6.0). (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionpH (Mean)
Day 2,n=1,1,0,2,0,0Day 3,n=3,0,0,1,0,0Day 5,n=2,0,0,2,1,0Week 1,n=2,1,1,3,0,0Week 2,n=1,0,0,4,1,0Week 4,n=3,1,1,5,0,1Week 8,n=1,0,0,2,0,0Week 18,n=3,1,0,1,0,0Week 24,n=1,1,0,4,0,0Week 32,n=1,0,0,0,0,0
Placebo5.006.005.505.505.506.505.505.676.007.50

[back to top]

Urine Potential of Hydrogen (pH) Analysis by Dipstick Method

Urinary pH measurement is a routine part of urinalysis. Urine pH is an acid-base measurement. pH is measured on a numeric scale ranging from 0 to 14; values on the scale refer to the degree of alkalinity or acidity. A pH of 7 is neutral. A pH less than 7 is acidic, and a pH greater than 7 is basic. Normal urine has a slightly acid pH (5.0 - 6.0). (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionpH (Mean)
Day 2,n=1,1,0,2,0,0Day 3,n=3,0,0,1,0,0Day 4,n=0,0,1,1,0,0Day 5,n=2,0,0,2,1,0Week 1,n=2,1,1,3,0,0Week 2,n=1,0,0,4,1,0Week 4,n=3,1,1,5,0,1Week 8,n=1,0,0,2,0,0Week 12,n=0,1,0,1,0,0Week 18,n=3,1,0,1,0,0Week 24,n=1,1,0,4,0,0Week 26,n=0,0,0,2,0,0
GSK3511294 30mg6.505.005.005.755.505.636.005.505.005.005.385.50

[back to top]

Urine Potential of Hydrogen (pH) Analysis by Dipstick Method

Urinary pH measurement is a routine part of urinalysis. Urine pH is an acid-base measurement. pH is measured on a numeric scale ranging from 0 to 14; values on the scale refer to the degree of alkalinity or acidity. A pH of 7 is neutral. A pH less than 7 is acidic, and a pH greater than 7 is basic. Normal urine has a slightly acid pH (5.0 - 6.0). (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionpH (Mean)
Day 5,n=2,0,0,2,1,0Week 2,n=1,0,0,4,1,0
GSK3511294 100mg5.508.50

[back to top]

Urine Potential of Hydrogen (pH) Analysis by Dipstick Method

Urinary pH measurement is a routine part of urinalysis. Urine pH is an acid-base measurement. pH is measured on a numeric scale ranging from 0 to 14; values on the scale refer to the degree of alkalinity or acidity. A pH of 7 is neutral. A pH less than 7 is acidic, and a pH greater than 7 is basic. Normal urine has a slightly acid pH (5.0 - 6.0). (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionpH (Mean)
Day 4,n=0,0,1,1,0,0Week 1,n=2,1,1,3,0,0Week 4,n=3,1,1,5,0,1
GSK3511294 10mg6.506.005.50

[back to top]

Urine Potential of Hydrogen (pH) Analysis by Dipstick Method

Urinary pH measurement is a routine part of urinalysis. Urine pH is an acid-base measurement. pH is measured on a numeric scale ranging from 0 to 14; values on the scale refer to the degree of alkalinity or acidity. A pH of 7 is neutral. A pH less than 7 is acidic, and a pH greater than 7 is basic. Normal urine has a slightly acid pH (5.0 - 6.0). (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionpH (Mean)
Day 2,n=1,1,0,2,0,0Week 1,n=2,1,1,3,0,0Week 4,n=3,1,1,5,0,1Week 12,n=0,1,0,1,0,0Week 18,n=3,1,0,1,0,0Week 24,n=1,1,0,4,0,0
GSK3511294 2mg7.007.008.006.507.006.50

[back to top]

Urine Specific Gravity Analysis by Dipstick Method

Urinary specific gravity measurement is a routine part of urinalysis. Urine specific gravity is a measure of the concentration of solutes in the urine and provides information on the kidney's ability to concentrate urine. The concentration of the excreted molecules determines the urine's specific gravity. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Week 4,n=3,1,1,5,0,1
GSK3511294 300mg1.0270

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PR Interval, QRS Interval, QT Interval and QT Interval Corrected by Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Interval

12-lead ECG were performed in a supine position using an automated ECG machine that calculated PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval and QTcF interval. ECG measurements were performed in triplicate. When multiple ECGs were performed at the same planned timepoint, the average value of each parameter was used. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
PR Interval,2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,6PR Interval,8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 4,n=12,6,6,8,9,6PR Interval,Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6PR Interval,Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6QRS Interval,2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,6QRS Interval,8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 4,n=12,6,6,8,9,6QRS Interval,Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6QRS Interval,Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6QT Interval,2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,6QT Interval,8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 4,n=12,6,6,8,9,6QT Interval,Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6QT Interval,Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6QTcF Interval,2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,6QTcF Interval,8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 4,n=12,6,6,8,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6QTcF Interval,Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg-7.5-3.3-4.1-1.4-4.3-1.24.51.0-4.0-1.9-2.1-2.0-5.6-4.8-3.3-3.6-1.2-3.1-3.7-2.6-2.2-2.9-2.8-1.4-3.3-1.9-1.1-1.6-1.80.4-1.3-3.0-9.2-7.6-0.6-2.4-3.2-1.3-5.68.314.06.01.10.57.913.25.3-0.96.42.1-0.21.93.53.95.511.511.48.14.75.910.112.811.77.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PR Interval, QRS Interval, QT Interval and QT Interval Corrected by Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Interval

12-lead ECG were performed in a supine position using an automated ECG machine that calculated PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval and QTcF interval. ECG measurements were performed in triplicate. When multiple ECGs were performed at the same planned timepoint, the average value of each parameter was used. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
PR Interval,2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,6PR Interval,8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 4,n=12,6,6,8,9,6PR Interval,Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0QRS Interval,2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,6QRS Interval,8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 4,n=12,6,6,8,9,6QRS Interval,Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0QT Interval,2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,6QT Interval,8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 4,n=12,6,6,8,9,6QT Interval,Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0QTcF Interval,2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,6QTcF Interval,8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 4,n=12,6,6,8,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg3.71.96.26.08.610.07.02.03.93.49.47.35.56.92.9-1.5-2.8-3.0-2.6-0.70.7-2.4-3.0-2.60.5-2.5-2.9-3.1-2.7-3.9-3.7-0.7-6.1-13.2-10.9-4.1-1.0-6.11.7-2.0-2.1-6.7-8.6-9.8-9.3-2.3-0.4-5.9-6.3-4.8-4.42.8-2.3-0.7-2.9-1.1-5.2-3.9-4.4-5.5
GSK3511294 30mg-4.3-4.5-4.4-3.6-2.3-0.2-3.21.8-1.8-3.6-3.8-5.6-7.4-3.2-3.70.0-1.1-2.7-0.61.1-0.20.60.91.90.9-0.10.4-1.10.40.7-2.91.5-3.0-7.6-11.6-9.5-9.41.03.34.6-6.5-4.50.7-6.1-3.4-3.4-1.4-6.9-5.3-7.7-4.7-5.43.70.5-1.7-5.9-0.60.4-1.7-4.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PR Interval, QRS Interval, QT Interval and QT Interval Corrected by Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Interval

12-lead ECG were performed in a supine position using an automated ECG machine that calculated PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval and QTcF interval. ECG measurements were performed in triplicate. When multiple ECGs were performed at the same planned timepoint, the average value of each parameter was used. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
PR Interval,2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,6PR Interval,8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 4,n=12,6,6,8,9,6PR Interval,Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6QRS Interval,2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,6QRS Interval,8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 4,n=12,6,6,8,9,6QRS Interval,Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6QT Interval,2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,6QT Interval,8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 4,n=12,6,6,8,9,6QT Interval,Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6QTcF Interval,2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,6QTcF Interval,8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 4,n=12,6,6,8,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 10mg3.5-1.81.40.5-2.53.52.25.51.8-2.6-4.40.13.73.70.0-7.2-4.0-4.9-1.3-7.8-7.3-3.7-3.9-6.5-3.6-4.4-5.0-6.5-5.5-6.16.012.6-14.1-6.9-15.9-14.30.07.8-3.61.04.2-2.8-9.90.9-14.4-5.5-3.6-12.8-6.5-6.1-13.6-6.7-8.3-6.6-4.8-5.3-10.4-7.2-3.9-13.8
GSK3511294 2mg3.93.12.05.28.18.30.85.35.23.23.91.51.43.05.40.2-0.20.51.41.90.20.62.11.8-1.03.11.81.82.12.014.86.74.3-0.9-2.2-2.28.712.911.06.98.16.34.210.212.94.14.32.60.40.71.510.36.37.35.25.94.83.09.61.3

[back to top]

Urine Specific Gravity Analysis by Dipstick Method

Urinary specific gravity measurement is a routine part of urinalysis. Urine specific gravity is a measure of the concentration of solutes in the urine and provides information on the kidney's ability to concentrate urine. The concentration of the excreted molecules determines the urine's specific gravity. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Day 2,n=1,2,0,2,0,0Day 3,n=2,0,0,1,0,0Day 5,n=2,0,0,2,1,0Week 1,n=2,1,1,3,0,0Week 2,n=1,0,0,4,1,0Week 4,n=3,1,1,5,0,1Week 8,n=1,0,0,2,0,0Week 18,n=3,1,0,1,0,0Week 24,n=1,1,0,4,0,0Week 32,n=1,0,0,0,0,0
Placebo1.02001.02651.02751.02351.02501.01931.03001.02601.02001.0150

[back to top]

Urine Specific Gravity Analysis by Dipstick Method

Urinary specific gravity measurement is a routine part of urinalysis. Urine specific gravity is a measure of the concentration of solutes in the urine and provides information on the kidney's ability to concentrate urine. The concentration of the excreted molecules determines the urine's specific gravity. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Day 2,n=1,2,0,2,0,0Day 3,n=2,0,0,1,0,0Day 4,n=0,0,1,1,0,0Day 5,n=2,0,0,2,1,0Week 1,n=2,1,1,3,0,0Week 2,n=1,0,0,4,1,0Week 4,n=3,1,1,5,0,1Week 8,n=1,0,0,2,0,0Week 12,n=0,1,0,1,0,0Week 18,n=3,1,0,1,0,0Week 24,n=1,1,0,4,0,0Week 26,n=0,0,0,2,0,0
GSK3511294 30mg1.01201.02801.02901.02051.01971.02181.01581.02201.02301.02301.02001.0240

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Monocyte, Eosinophil, Basophil and Platelet Count

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionGiga cells per liter (Mean)
Basophils, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Basophils, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Basophils, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Basophils, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Basophils, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Basophils, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Basophils, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Basophils, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Basophils, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Eosinophils, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Eosinophils, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Eosinophils, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Eosinophils, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Eosinophils, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Eosinophils, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Eosinophils, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Lymphocytes, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Lymphocytes, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Lymphocytes, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Lymphocytes, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Lymphocytes, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Lymphocytes, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Lymphocytes, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Monocytes, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Monocytes, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Monocytes, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Monocytes, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Monocytes, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Monocytes, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Monocytes, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Platelet, Day 2,n=12,5,5,9,9,6Platelet, Day 3,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Day 4,n=12,5,5,8,8,6Platelet, Day 5,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 1,n=12,5,6,9,8,6Platelet, Week 2,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 4,n=12,5,4,9,9,6Platelet, Week 8,n=12,5,5,9,9,6Platelet, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Platelet, Week 18,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 24,n=10,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 26,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 32,n=6,5,6,0,0,6Platelet, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Platelet, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Neutrophil, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Neutrophil, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Neutrophil, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Neutrophil, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Neutrophil, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Neutrophil, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Neutrophil, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo-0.0060.002-0.003-0.020-0.001-0.006-0.0100.0050.002-0.002-0.005-0.004-0.002-0.0020.0000.024-0.0010.014-0.0340.0330.0720.0250.0360.0250.029-0.0210.0350.008-0.0450.245-0.0100.0640.006-0.0770.048-0.133-0.189-0.057-0.142-0.212-0.179-0.088-0.1650.0070.285-0.0020.0290.032-0.0340.0060.0130.0010.0480.0070.0420.0280.040-0.0350.0670.040-9.7-2.8-5.6-7.6-0.93.5-11.54.3-14.8-8.6-1.92.45.5-1.8-20.0-0.0780.1610.3900.155-0.179-0.209-0.540-0.2180.043-0.093-0.326-0.105-0.393-0.163-0.005

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Monocyte, Eosinophil, Basophil and Platelet Count

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionGiga cells per liter (Mean)
Basophils, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Basophils, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Basophils, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Basophils, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Basophils, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Basophils, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Basophils, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Basophils, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Eosinophils, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Eosinophils, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Eosinophils, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Eosinophils, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Eosinophils, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Eosinophils, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Lymphocytes, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Lymphocytes, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Lymphocytes, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Lymphocytes, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Lymphocytes, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Lymphocytes, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Monocytes, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Monocytes, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Monocytes, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Monocytes, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Monocytes, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Monocytes, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Platelet, Day 2,n=12,5,5,9,9,6Platelet, Day 3,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Day 4,n=12,5,5,8,8,6Platelet, Day 5,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 1,n=12,5,6,9,8,6Platelet, Week 2,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 4,n=12,5,4,9,9,6Platelet, Week 8,n=12,5,5,9,9,6Platelet, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Platelet, Week 18,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 24,n=10,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 26,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 32,n=6,5,6,0,0,6Platelet, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Neutrophil, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Neutrophil, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Neutrophil, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Neutrophil, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Neutrophil, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Neutrophil, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg-0.018-0.0070.002-0.025-0.006-0.007-0.010-0.015-0.006-0.005-0.018-0.008-0.008-0.012-0.152-0.182-0.192-0.210-0.206-0.223-0.253-0.252-0.250-0.253-0.245-0.252-0.235-0.2220.1000.1430.2100.047-0.1540.047-0.137-0.075-0.388-0.063-0.132-0.188-0.148-0.1250.0520.0180.050-0.035-0.0120.090-0.0030.0580.0840.0430.0370.013-0.012-0.032-1.5-0.8-0.2-2.8-13.8-15.5-5.0-3.5-25.62.2-5.7-6.8-15.7-11.70.1020.0380.2150.1030.070-0.3100.0230.258-0.362-0.027-0.128-0.295-0.3600.332

[back to top]

Urine Specific Gravity Analysis by Dipstick Method

Urinary specific gravity measurement is a routine part of urinalysis. Urine specific gravity is a measure of the concentration of solutes in the urine and provides information on the kidney's ability to concentrate urine. The concentration of the excreted molecules determines the urine's specific gravity. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Day 5,n=2,0,0,2,1,0Week 2,n=1,0,0,4,1,0
GSK3511294 100mg1.01401.0130

[back to top]

Urine Specific Gravity Analysis by Dipstick Method

Urinary specific gravity measurement is a routine part of urinalysis. Urine specific gravity is a measure of the concentration of solutes in the urine and provides information on the kidney's ability to concentrate urine. The concentration of the excreted molecules determines the urine's specific gravity. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Day 4,n=0,0,1,1,0,0Week 1,n=2,1,1,3,0,0Week 4,n=3,1,1,5,0,1
GSK3511294 10mg1.01501.02501.0250

[back to top]

Urine Specific Gravity Analysis by Dipstick Method

Urinary specific gravity measurement is a routine part of urinalysis. Urine specific gravity is a measure of the concentration of solutes in the urine and provides information on the kidney's ability to concentrate urine. The concentration of the excreted molecules determines the urine's specific gravity. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Day 2,n=1,2,0,2,0,0Week 1,n=2,1,1,3,0,0Week 4,n=3,1,1,5,0,1Week 12,n=0,1,0,1,0,0Week 18,n=3,1,0,1,0,0Week 24,n=1,1,0,4,0,0
GSK3511294 2mg1.01251.02601.01501.01801.01801.0230

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Monocyte, Eosinophil, Basophil and Platelet Count

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionGiga cells per liter (Mean)
Basophils, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Basophils, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Basophils, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Basophils, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Basophils, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Basophils, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Basophils, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Eosinophils, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Eosinophils, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Eosinophils, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Eosinophils, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Eosinophils, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Lymphocytes, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Lymphocytes, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Lymphocytes, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Lymphocytes, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Lymphocytes, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Monocytes, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Monocytes, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Monocytes, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Monocytes, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Monocytes, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Platelet, Day 2,n=12,5,5,9,9,6Platelet, Day 3,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Day 4,n=12,5,5,8,8,6Platelet, Day 5,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 1,n=12,5,6,9,8,6Platelet, Week 2,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 4,n=12,5,4,9,9,6Platelet, Week 8,n=12,5,5,9,9,6Platelet, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Platelet, Week 18,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 24,n=10,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 26,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 32,n=6,5,6,0,0,6Neutrophil, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Neutrophil, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Neutrophil, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Neutrophil, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Neutrophil, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 10mg0.0030.010-0.008-0.020-0.0180.000-0.004-0.022-0.008-0.012-0.0050.0000.005-0.145-0.203-0.212-0.235-0.242-0.210-0.238-0.280-0.262-0.208-0.103-0.0370.0030.1080.1430.1720.0850.0580.0960.056-0.1070.072-0.042-0.040-0.138-0.1970.1230.1000.1180.0530.0570.056-0.018-0.053-0.013-0.0450.0700.0100.098-6.45.76.6-3.05.0-6.31.32.6-9.0-14.0-10.0-19.3-6.3-0.0050.2250.438-0.003-0.160-0.142-0.156-0.2770.0530.015-0.370-0.6220.880
GSK3511294 2mg-0.0200.0030.002-0.008-0.017-0.018-0.0020.007-0.0140.0100.0020.0020.010-0.120-0.167-0.172-0.202-0.195-0.212-0.227-0.230-0.174-0.148-0.072-0.0420.0420.1350.3300.1930.1080.2950.2220.0880.1050.228-0.032-0.028-0.223-0.0570.0170.028-0.002-0.0250.0720.0500.1030.1230.050-0.040-0.013-0.037-0.013-6.8-9.4-5.8-3.6-10.22.8-6.811.6-6.0-13.4-7.8-13.8-0.60.4130.0150.5600.085-0.483-0.738-0.7680.497-0.712-0.158-0.752-0.527-0.708

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like MCV. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionFemtoliters (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo0.20.70.31.3-0.20.00.70.30.5-0.4-0.8-0.50.5-1.5-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like MCV. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionFemtoliters (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg1.30.30.20.7-0.7-0.3-0.2-0.2-1.2-1.0-0.7-0.3-0.21.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like MCV. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionFemtoliters (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg-0.3-1.0-1.8-1.0-1.7-1.4-1.6-2.2-2.4-2.8-2.4-2.3-1.8
GSK3511294 30mg0.10.0-0.12.0-1.2-0.9-0.70.0-0.7-1.9-1.6-1.7-1.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like MCV. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionFemtoliters (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 2mg0.2-0.3-0.50.5-0.8-0.3-0.8-0.3-1.2-0.8-0.30.00.0
GSK3511294 10mg0.20.20.00.30.20.20.20.20.20.50.80.50.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like MCH. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionPicograms (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo0.030.130.140.08-0.07-0.020.15-0.06-0.08-0.13-0.44-0.270.22-1.00-0.55

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like MCH. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionPicograms (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg-0.07-0.080.12-0.22-0.08-0.02-0.22-0.22-0.60-0.78-0.90-1.07-0.58-0.68

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like MCH. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionPicograms (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg-0.020.200.010.020.00-0.04-0.06-0.11-0.040.01-0.37-0.71-0.68
GSK3511294 30mg-0.04-0.020.05-0.030.00-0.08-0.29-0.30-0.42-0.37-0.37-0.38-1.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like MCH. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionPicograms (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 10mg0.020.100.180.22-0.070.250.120.300.02-0.100.230.100.53
GSK3511294 2mg0.230.250.170.170.380.330.300.250.320.780.871.050.67

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like hemoglobin. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo-2.41.6-0.8-5.0-4.9-3.3-4.2-1.1-4.3-1.6-5.3-4.6-1.7-1.8-3.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like hemoglobin. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg0.2-0.53.2-0.3-1.5-3.5-2.5-0.2-3.60.5-0.2-2.7-1.8-0.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Presence of Ketones, Glucose, Occult Blood, and Protein

Urine samples were collected to analyze presence of ketones, occult blood, glucose, and protein in urine. In this dipstick test, the level of occult blood, glucose, ketones and urine protein in urine samples were recorded as negative, trace, 1+ and 2+ indicating proportional concentrations in urine. Only categories with abnormal significant values have been presented. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Occult blood, Trace,Week 4,n=2,1,1,5,0,1Urine Ketone, 1+, Week 40,n=0,0,0,0,0,1Urine Protein, 2+, Week 4,n=2,1,1,5,0,1
GSK3511294 300mg010

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like hemoglobin. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg4.32.21.40.82.03.32.64.95.98.32.42.96.9
GSK3511294 30mg-0.40.1-1.0-2.9-1.4-2.4-4.2-5.6-2.8-2.4-1.7-2.2-2.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like hemoglobin. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 10mg3.75.83.7-0.30.2-3.7-3.01.5-0.2-2.30.5-1.05.2
GSK3511294 2mg0.3-0.5-1.3-4.8-8.3-6.2-8.0-4.8-4.8-1.8-3.2-4.5-1.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like hematocrit. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionProportion of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo-0.0070.005-0.003-0.010-0.014-0.010-0.011-0.001-0.010-0.004-0.013-0.013-0.0050.001-0.004

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like hematocrit. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionProportion of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg0.0070.0010.0080.006-0.005-0.011-0.0040.002-0.0060.0080.0090.0060.0020.016

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like hematocrit. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionProportion of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg0.011-0.000-0.004-0.001-0.0010.0020.0010.0050.0060.0120.0010.0080.022
GSK3511294 30mg0.0000.001-0.0030.001-0.008-0.009-0.010-0.011-0.005-0.010-0.006-0.007-0.001

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like hematocrit. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionProportion of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 10mg0.0090.0140.005-0.0040.000-0.016-0.010-0.000-0.001-0.0050.001-0.0040.009
GSK3511294 2mg-0.001-0.007-0.009-0.015-0.034-0.025-0.032-0.020-0.025-0.020-0.023-0.029-0.015

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate: Electrocardiogram (ECG)

12-lead ECG were performed in a supine position using an automated ECG machine that calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, QT and corrected QT (QTc) intervals. ECG measurements were performed in triplicate. When multiple ECGs were performed at the same planned timepoint, the average value of each parameter was used. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,68 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo1.40.10.41.53.51.8-2.8-4.2-3.8-0.80.3-3.4-2.7-2.0-2.71.5-4.3

[back to top]

AUC(0-t) of GSK3511294 300 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for AUC (0-t). Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32 and 40 post-dose

InterventionDay*microgram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 300mg1855.619

[back to top]

CL/F of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for CL/F. CL/F was calculated as dose divided by AUC(0-inf). Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26 and 36 post-dose

InterventionLiters per day (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 30mg0.14402
GSK3511294 100mg0.11811

[back to top]

CL/F of GSK3511294 300 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for CL/F. CL/F was calculated as dose divided by AUC(0-inf). Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32 and 40 post-dose

InterventionLiters per day (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 300mg0.16011

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Monocyte, Eosinophil, Basophil and Platelet Count

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionGiga cells per liter (Mean)
Basophils, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Basophils, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Basophils, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Basophils, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Basophils, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Basophils, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Basophils, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Basophils, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Eosinophils, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Eosinophils, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Eosinophils, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Eosinophils, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Eosinophils, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Eosinophils, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Lymphocytes, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Lymphocytes, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Lymphocytes, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Lymphocytes, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Lymphocytes, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Lymphocytes, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Monocytes, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Monocytes, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Monocytes, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Monocytes, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Monocytes, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Monocytes, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Platelet, Day 2,n=12,5,5,9,9,6Platelet, Day 3,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Day 4,n=12,5,5,8,8,6Platelet, Day 5,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 1,n=12,5,6,9,8,6Platelet, Week 2,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 4,n=12,5,4,9,9,6Platelet, Week 8,n=12,5,5,9,9,6Platelet, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Platelet, Week 18,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 24,n=10,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 26,n=12,5,6,9,9,6Platelet, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Neutrophil, Day 2,n=12,6,6,8,9,6Neutrophil, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Neutrophil, Day 5,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Neutrophil, Week 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 12,n=12,5,6,9,9,5Neutrophil, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Neutrophil, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg0.001-0.003-0.001-0.0030.001-0.007-0.006-0.002-0.0040.010-0.001-0.002-0.002-0.208-0.287-0.300-0.276-0.298-0.307-0.321-0.343-0.336-0.338-0.334-0.319-0.258-0.157-0.0810.0050.104-0.018-0.068-0.0520.0520.0480.0500.0520.0180.0060.0190.0320.0680.0740.1010.1180.0410.0800.1400.0920.1590.1210.1586.11.7-1.16.216.825.012.322.027.415.919.711.813.90.2410.2170.1300.1840.1740.229-0.340-0.127-0.344-0.1510.1400.104-0.004
GSK3511294 30mg-0.003-0.003-0.004-0.0090.002-0.0040.002-0.010-0.003-0.001-0.0040.0080.021-0.251-0.289-0.348-0.326-0.324-0.344-0.366-0.379-0.371-0.359-0.300-0.273-0.041-0.061-0.1400.005-0.253-0.060-0.120-0.062-0.1880.014-0.097-0.070-0.116-0.0430.015-0.028-0.038-0.1000.0320.0040.042-0.0060.0590.0180.0470.0360.053-6.8-7.1-0.4-4.6-3.9-0.9-1.6-11.3-10.81.6-1.6-2.4-0.30.3010.0770.1510.041-0.151-0.192-0.279-0.069-0.180-0.012-0.144-0.259-0.384

[back to top]

Cmax of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for Cmax. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26 and 36 post-dose

InterventionMicrogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 30mg2.8101
GSK3511294 100mg12.2471

[back to top]

Cmax of GSK3511294 300 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for Cmax. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32 and 40 post-dose

InterventionMicrogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 300mg28.5987

[back to top]

Lambda_z of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for lambda_z. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26 and 36 post-dose

InterventionDay^-1 (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 30mg0.018435
GSK3511294 100mg0.017813

[back to top]

Lambda_z of GSK3511294 300 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for lambda_z. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32 and 40 post-dose

InterventionDay^-1 (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 300mg0.017148

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for Cmax. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, and 26 post-dose

InterventionMicrogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 2mg0.3400
GSK3511294 10mg0.8759

[back to top]

Percentage of AUC (0-inf) Obtained by Extrapolation (%AUCex) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for %AUCex. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, and 26 post-dose

InterventionPercentage of AUCex (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 2mg24.3560
GSK3511294 10mg7.7705

[back to top]

T1/2 of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for t1/2. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26 and 36 post-dose

InterventionDays (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 30mg37.599
GSK3511294 100mg38.913

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Like Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like ALP, AST and ALT. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionInternational units per Liter (Mean)
ALT, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6ALT, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5ALT, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6AST, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6AST, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5AST, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6ALP, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6ALP, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5ALP, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 10mg4.05.34.22.32.8-1.30.72.50.51.05.2-0.5-1.0-0.8-1.2-2.0-1.7-0.2-2.50.00.51.21.30.80.2-2.51.00.30.00.3-2.5-4.2-1.21.07.2-1.7-1.0-2.20.2
GSK3511294 2mg0.32.53.32.01.3-5.3-4.3-3.3-1.7-3.5-3.5-0.8-1.7-1.2-0.8-0.8-0.50.0-0.3-2.3-1.8-1.2-1.21.31.80.5-3.3-2.7-1.3-2.0-2.2-8.2-8.2-2.0-4.3-2.0-1.2-6.2-3.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like hsCRP. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionMilligrams per liter (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,5,6,0,0,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo-0.3443-0.4376-0.4570-0.3953-0.21760.0638-0.12530.59550.14550.15380.11630.24380.63930.4917-0.1450

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like hsCRP. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionMilligrams per liter (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg-1.0956-1.4100-1.5311-1.4289-1.31560.24782.6422-1.1656-0.4067-1.1267-0.7989-0.6933-0.1911
GSK3511294 30mg-0.3178-0.4367-0.5356-0.5322-0.57720.1733-0.2689-0.08780.90890.07000.13560.3344-0.5456

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like hsCRP. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionMilligrams per liter (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,5,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 10mg-0.7367-0.8200-0.8683-0.7150-0.3033-0.6967-0.6433-0.36330.12500.1317-0.6383-0.6383-0.2400
GSK3511294 2mg-0.1217-0.1417-0.1917-0.01170.21830.01670.14331.2817-0.10330.18830.43831.63330.2860

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Total Protein and Albumin

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like total protein and albumin. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Total protein, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Total protein, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Total protein, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Total protein, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Total protein, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Albumin, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Albumin, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Albumin, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Albumin, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Albumin, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo-2.8-1.4-1.8-3.3-1.6-1.8-2.5-1.0-2.8-1.3-3.3-2.5-1.7-1.5-2.5-2.1-0.8-1.3-1.6-0.5-0.8-1.8-0.8-1.5-0.5-1.7-1.6-0.5-0.7-1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Total Protein and Albumin

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like total protein and albumin. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Total protein, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Total protein, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Total protein, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Total protein, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Albumin, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Albumin, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Albumin, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Albumin, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg-0.20.01.70.0-1.4-1.0-1.01.20.01.50.30.3-0.70.7-0.5-0.30.3-0.2-1.4-0.5-1.30.7-0.20.2-0.2-0.3-0.8-0.3

[back to top]

AUC(0-inf) of GSK3511294 300 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for AUC (0-inf). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32 and 40 post-dose

InterventionDay*microgram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 300mg1873.657

[back to top]

AUC(0-inf) of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for AUC (0-inf). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26 and 36 post-dose

InterventionDay*microgram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 30mg208.308
GSK3511294 100mg846.686

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC[0-t]) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for AUC (0-t). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, and 26 post-dose

InterventionDay*microgram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 2mg18.369
GSK3511294 10mg62.101

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-inf]) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for AUC (0-inf). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. Pharmacokinetic Population included participants in the Safety population for whom a pharmcokinetic sample was obtained and analyzed. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, and 26 post-dose

InterventionDay*microgram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 2mg24.795
GSK3511294 10mg68.904

[back to top]

T1/2 of GSK3511294 300 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for t1/2. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32 and 40 post-dose

InterventionDays (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 300mg40.422

[back to top]

Terminal Phase Elimination Rate Constant (Lambda_z) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for lambda_z. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, and 26 post-dose

InterventionDay^-1 (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 2mg0.013195
GSK3511294 10mg0.015787

[back to top]

Terminal Phase Half-life (t1/2) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for t1/2. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, and 26 post-dose

InterventionDays (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 2mg52.531
GSK3511294 10mg43.907

[back to top]

Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (Tlast) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for Tlast. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, and 26 post-dose

InterventionDays (Median)
GSK3511294 2mg84.47
GSK3511294 10mg176.46

[back to top]

Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for Tmax. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, and 26 post-dose

InterventionDays (Median)
GSK3511294 2mg10.966
GSK3511294 10mg7.956

[back to top]

Titers of Binding ADA to GSK3511294

Serum samples were collected to determine the presence of anti-GSK3511294 binding antibodies using a validated bioanalytical method. Data for any time post-Baseline is reported. Titer was only measured when a positive result was found. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Up to Week 40

InterventionTiter (Median)
GSK3511294 10mg80.0
GSK3511294 30mg160.0
GSK3511294 100mg80.0
GSK3511294 300mg80.0

[back to top]

Tlast of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for Tlast. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26 and 36 post-dose

InterventionDays (Median)
GSK3511294 30mg182.01
GSK3511294 100mg252.00

[back to top]

Tlast of GSK3511294 300 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for Tlast. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32 and 40 post-dose

InterventionDays (Median)
GSK3511294 300mg279.99

[back to top]

Tmax of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for Tmax. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26 and 36 post-dose

InterventionDays (Median)
GSK3511294 30mg13.943
GSK3511294 100mg13.970

[back to top]

Tmax of GSK3511294 300 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for Tmax. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32 and 40 post-dose

InterventionDays (Median)
GSK3511294 300mg13.909

[back to top]

Vd/F of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for Vd/F. Vd/F was calculated as dose divided by [lambda_z *AUC(0-inf)]. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26 and 36 post-dose

InterventionLiters (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 30mg7.812
GSK3511294 100mg6.630

[back to top]

Vd/F of GSK3511294 300 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for Vd/F. Vd/F was calculated as dose divided by [lambda_z *AUC(0-inf)]. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32 and 40 post-dose

InterventionLiters (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 300mg9.337

[back to top]

Absolute Values of Complement (C)3 and C4

Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for analysis for complement (C3 and C4). Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionGrams per liter (Geometric Mean)
C3, Baseline,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 24,n=12,6,6,8,9,6C3, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6C4, Baseline,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 24,n=12,6,6,8,9,6C4, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 10mg1.0861.161.2361.1811.0921.021.1111.0971.1241.1241.1711.1421.2310.19190.20610.22120.20060.18660.17810.1890.20450.20340.20250.1970.19390.2007
GSK3511294 2mg1.1821.271.2441.2841.1221.1471.051.2261.0331.2151.1360.9271.2430.20610.21610.20380.23030.18920.21080.19280.25470.18620.22660.22440.2020.2401

[back to top]

Absolute Values of Complement (C)3 and C4

Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for analysis for complement (C3 and C4). Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionGrams per liter (Geometric Mean)
C3, Baseline,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 24,n=12,6,6,8,9,6C3, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0C4, Baseline,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 24,n=12,6,6,8,9,6C4, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg1.1371.1881.1571.1651.1651.1741.1481.1671.2111.2311.2431.2221.2360.19390.2030.19620.19350.19430.20180.18720.19010.1960.16780.19090.1630.206
GSK3511294 30mg1.0741.1141.1421.1441.1131.1391.071.1171.1471.1841.1571.1561.1880.21440.21330.21420.21280.20730.2210.20630.20090.21140.2260.2060.21150.2025

[back to top]

Absolute Values of Complement (C)3 and C4

Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for analysis for complement (C3 and C4). Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionGrams per liter (Geometric Mean)
C3, Baseline,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 24,n=12,6,6,8,9,6C3, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6C3, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6C4, Baseline,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 24,n=12,6,6,8,9,6C4, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6C4, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg1.2541.2861.3221.3161.3051.281.221.341.281.2831.2221.2981.2041.2310.2150.220.2230.21880.21630.21690.19290.22310.20740.2160.21140.2260.20510.2134

[back to top]

Absolute Values of Complement (C)3 and C4

Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for analysis for complement (C3 and C4). Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionGrams per liter (Geometric Mean)
C3, Baseline,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 24,n=12,6,6,8,9,6C3, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C3, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6C3, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0C3, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6C4, Baseline,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 24,n=12,6,6,8,9,6C4, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6C4, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6C4, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0C4, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo1.1491.131.1871.171.1361.1361.1141.2241.1171.1731.151.2041.1731.2431.1810.25760.25250.26470.2530.24970.25550.26020.27380.24130.2610.24740.25170.27720.28440.1699

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter Like Glucose, Calcium, Potassium, Sodium, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), and Magnesium

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like glucose, calcium, potassium, sodium, BUN, and magnesium. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionMillimoles per liter (Mean)
Glucose, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Glucose, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Glucose, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Calcium, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Calcium, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Calcium, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Potassium, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Potassium, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Potassium, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Sodium, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Sodium, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Sodium, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Magnesium, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Magnesium, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Magnesium, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6BUN, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6BUN, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5BUN, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 2mg-0.13-0.100.12-0.07-0.35-0.05-0.33-0.42-0.15-0.02-0.13-0.100.02-0.027-0.033-0.017-0.050-0.047-0.013-0.027-0.007-0.060-0.013-0.053-0.0670.0270.020.030.050.100.050.05-0.070.00-0.020.00-0.02-0.030.030.00.00.21.70.81.01.00.01.0-0.7-0.20.00.5-0.037-0.043-0.020-0.047-0.003-0.003-0.033-0.027-0.043-0.030-0.023-0.057-0.023-0.170.00-0.25-0.33-0.50-0.75-0.75-0.170.170.50-0.17-0.33-0.33
GSK3511294 10mg0.14-0.93-0.330.28-0.180.000.030.270.130.420.020.62-0.28-0.0040.0270.0170.0030.017-0.033-0.013-0.003-0.003-0.0330.007-0.0170.0200.440.020.080.000.180.200.270.120.120.070.030.000.120.00.30.0-1.3-1.7-0.7-1.2-0.5-0.8-1.0-1.5-0.7-1.80.008-0.003-0.007-0.0330.0170.0330.000-0.0070.0000.000-0.017-0.0170.0170.20-0.17-0.330.670.500.330.751.170.170.581.420.830.75

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter Like Glucose, Calcium, Potassium, Sodium, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), and Magnesium

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like glucose, calcium, potassium, sodium, BUN, and magnesium. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionMillimoles per liter (Mean)
Glucose, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Glucose, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Glucose, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Calcium, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Calcium, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Calcium, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Potassium, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Potassium, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Potassium, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Sodium, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Sodium, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Sodium, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Magnesium, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Magnesium, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Magnesium, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0BUN, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6BUN, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5BUN, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg-0.72-0.21-0.34-0.17-0.23-0.18-0.08-0.36-0.66-0.23-0.26-0.22-0.070.016-0.022-0.007-0.031-0.0290.0620.0220.0310.0360.0310.0220.0130.0290.180.010.060.040.070.090.110.140.040.13-0.040.070.090.90.90.30.8-0.1-0.3-0.6-1.1-0.30.00.2-1.1-1.3-0.036-0.064-0.060-0.036-0.040-0.036-0.027-0.018-0.011-0.036-0.047-0.036-0.013-0.28-0.280.00-0.170.11-0.170.170.280.060.000.330.220.28
GSK3511294 30mg-0.11-0.180.260.01-0.20-0.02-0.280.040.08-0.17-0.27-0.09-0.26-0.049-0.011-0.033-0.040-0.044-0.002-0.031-0.024-0.0200.007-0.016-0.056-0.0130.060.140.030.110.22-0.04-0.040.000.000.030.12-0.010.08-0.30.4-0.8-0.20.10.0-1.2-0.7-0.2-0.7-0.9-1.1-0.90.0000.007-0.0070.007-0.0070.0180.0070.0160.0110.0000.0000.0000.004-0.67-0.72-0.61-0.61-0.440.060.220.06-0.060.390.11-0.17-0.72

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter Like Glucose, Calcium, Potassium, Sodium, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), and Magnesium

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like glucose, calcium, potassium, sodium, BUN, and magnesium. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionMillimoles per liter (Mean)
Glucose, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Glucose, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Glucose, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Glucose, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Calcium, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Calcium, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Calcium, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Calcium, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Potassium, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Potassium, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Potassium, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Potassium Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Sodium, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Sodium, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Sodium, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Sodium, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Magnesium, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Magnesium, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Magnesium, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Magnesium, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6BUN, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6BUN, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5BUN, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6BUN, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg0.200.150.500.050.50-0.100.330.420.230.150.500.380.320.230.0430.0700.0730.043-0.0400.0130.033-0.003-0.0030.0100.027-0.0100.0100.0430.170.120.270.150.000.020.00-0.050.030.020.070.070.120.131.82.01.31.70.41.01.01.51.30.81.21.70.70.0-0.020-0.037-0.047-0.020-0.032-0.027-0.017-0.0030.0000.000-0.003-0.027-0.027-0.030-1.25-1.17-0.50-0.67-1.10-0.33-0.08-0.580.25-0.330.170.08-0.08-0.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter Like Glucose, Calcium, Potassium, Sodium, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), and Magnesium

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like glucose, calcium, potassium, sodium, BUN, and magnesium. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionMillimoles per liter (Mean)
Glucose, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Glucose, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Glucose, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Glucose, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Glucose, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Glucose, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Calcium, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Calcium, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Calcium, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Calcium, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Calcium, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Calcium, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Potassium, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Potassium, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Potassium, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Potassium, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Potassium, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Potassium Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Sodium, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Sodium, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Sodium, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Sodium, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Sodium, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Sodium, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Magnesium, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Magnesium, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Magnesium, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Magnesium, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Magnesium Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Magnesium, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6BUN, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6BUN, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5BUN, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6BUN, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6BUN, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0BUN, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo0.06-0.28-0.11-0.060.000.030.190.060.320.030.380.180.400.170.40-0.0250.0080.012-0.023-0.009-0.007-0.0400.000-0.0170.003-0.035-0.018-0.0200.0000.000-0.03-0.070.130.11-0.020.000.000.18-0.02-0.02-0.03-0.13-0.150.07-0.350.81.21.11.30.80.10.00.10.00.10.30.20.3-0.30.5-0.020-0.012-0.013-0.017-0.0040.0050.007-0.003-0.0130.0170.0080.002-0.010-0.0130.030-0.83-0.79-0.75-0.71-0.45-0.33-0.25-0.75-0.75-1.08-0.79-0.38-1.00-0.58-1.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Total Protein and Albumin

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like total protein and albumin. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Total protein, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Total protein, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Total protein, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Albumin, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Albumin, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Albumin, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 10mg-0.60.20.3-0.7-2.8-2.8-0.80.2-0.5-1.7-1.0-2.30.3-1.6-0.2-0.7-0.80.0-1.7-0.30.70.0-1.5-0.8-1.8-0.2
GSK3511294 2mg-2.3-2.5-1.2-2.7-2.3-2.8-3.3-0.8-3.5-1.8-2.8-3.50.0-1.3-1.3-0.5-1.5-0.2-0.2-1.0-0.3-1.3-0.30.3-0.81.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Total Protein and Albumin

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like total protein and albumin. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Total protein, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Total protein, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Total protein, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total protein, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Albumin, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Albumin, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Albumin, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Albumin, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg0.7-0.7-0.40.1-1.11.1-0.11.42.71.70.61.01.8-0.6-1.3-1.4-0.2-1.40.4-0.60.70.40.20.40.10.6
GSK3511294 30mg-3.8-1.7-2.8-3.2-1.2-1.2-1.4-3.0-2.6-2.0-2.7-3.7-2.6-2.4-1.4-2.2-2.3-2.2-0.8-1.3-2.0-1.7-0.7-2.0-2.1-1.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Like Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like ALP, AST and ALT. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionInternational units per Liter (Mean)
ALT, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6ALT, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5ALT, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0AST, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6AST, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5AST, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0ALP, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6ALP, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5ALP, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg-0.1-1.0-0.10.20.6-2.3-2.61.83.04.47.36.25.0-3.9-5.6-4.9-3.7-3.3-3.8-4.3-1.0-1.4-1.8-2.80.1-3.21.3-0.6-0.21.9-1.13.12.63.73.13.85.84.87.2
GSK3511294 30mg-1.6-0.6-1.2-0.60.70.31.4-1.6-0.41.92.25.11.3-2.6-1.8-2.9-3.2-1.91.00.0-0.2-1.2-0.7-1.10.0-2.0-4.9-1.8-1.9-1.4-0.7-0.6-3.2-4.4-2.81.91.20.4-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Like Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like ALP, AST and ALT. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionInternational units per Liter (Mean)
ALT, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6ALT, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5ALT, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6ALT, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6AST, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6AST, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5AST, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6AST, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6ALP, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6ALP, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5ALP, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6ALP, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg-0.71.21.24.51.23.0-2.8-3.0-0.7-0.70.82.5-3.01.2-3.7-3.2-3.3-2.0-4.6-0.7-4.2-4.7-2.0-3.3-1.80.2-3.53.0-1.50.2-1.3-1.2-1.2-1.0-2.2-0.8-0.3-3.5-0.7-1.7-1.0-3.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Like Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like ALP, AST and ALT. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionInternational units per Liter (Mean)
ALT, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6ALT, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5ALT, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALT, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6ALT, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0ALT, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6AST, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6AST, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5AST, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6AST, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6AST, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0AST, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6ALP, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6ALP, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5ALP, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6ALP, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6ALP, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0ALP, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo-0.30.31.01.71.2-0.2-0.30.3-0.9-0.10.3-2.11.50.3-3.5-3.5-3.8-4.3-2.6-2.8-1.5-1.5-0.9-2.8-1.81.2-2.7-2.7-1.0-7.5-1.8-1.8-1.70.10.21.01.41.9-0.63.13.83.2-2.09.0-5.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Like Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin and Creatinine

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like total bilirubin, direct bilirubin and creatinine. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
Total bilirubin, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Total bilirubin, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Direct bilirubin, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Direct bilirubin, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Creatinine, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Creatinine, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Creatinine, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 10mg-1.6-1.7-2.0-2.01.70.70.32.04.32.01.70.30.0-0.4-0.3-0.7-0.7-0.30.00.30.30.30.0-0.30.3-0.3-1.42-2.95-0.75-2.53-2.08-0.900.27-1.201.032.051.600.276.60
GSK3511294 2mg-1.3-1.7-2.7-5.0-0.7-2.30.3-1.00.0-1.3-1.32.7-1.0-0.7-0.3-0.3-0.7-0.30.00.00.00.00.00.30.7-0.3-1.03-1.78-0.730.723.681.47-2.800.280.881.751.77-2.220.87

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Like Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin and Creatinine

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like total bilirubin, direct bilirubin and creatinine. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
Total bilirubin, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Total bilirubin, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Direct bilirubin, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Direct bilirubin, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Creatinine, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Creatinine, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Creatinine, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg0.0-0.40.0-1.30.40.4-0.40.40.00.41.6-0.7-1.10.20.00.20.00.00.20.20.40.20.40.90.00.4-0.77-1.87-0.880.390.592.270.596.005.014.422.660.6910.42
GSK3511294 30mg-0.20.20.0-0.9-1.12.20.02.2-0.90.70.2-0.20.4-0.20.40.20.20.00.70.20.90.20.70.20.00.0-4.91-1.58-4.64-4.63-3.06-2.670.090.19-0.412.837.073.162.57

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Like Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin and Creatinine

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like total bilirubin, direct bilirubin and creatinine. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
Total bilirubin, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Total bilirubin, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Total bilirubin, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Direct bilirubin, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Direct bilirubin, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Direct bilirubin, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Creatinine, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Creatinine, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Creatinine, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Creatinine, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg1.00.31.0-0.7-2.00.71.0-1.0-0.7-1.02.01.70.00.70.30.0-0.3-0.7-0.80.30.0-0.7-0.30.00.00.00.0-0.3-1.63-1.203.68-1.62-0.700.736.051.630.721.152.203.222.051.60

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Like Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin and Creatinine

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like total bilirubin, direct bilirubin and creatinine. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
Total bilirubin, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Total bilirubin, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Total bilirubin, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Total bilirubin, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Total bilirubin, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Direct bilirubin, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Direct bilirubin, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Direct bilirubin, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Direct bilirubin, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Direct bilirubin, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6Creatinine, Day 2,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Creatinine, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,5Creatinine, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Creatinine, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Creatinine, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Creatinine, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo-0.8-1.3-1.0-2.3-1.5-1.2-0.7-1.2-1.3-0.3-0.8-1.30.7-0.72.0-0.3-0.5-0.5-0.7-0.5-0.30.0-0.2-0.5-0.2-0.30.0-0.30.0-1.0-2.80-3.480.29-2.73-2.49-1.12-1.28-1.40-0.30-1.270.89-2.290.00-0.601.75

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Presence of Ketones, Glucose, Occult Blood, and Protein

Urine samples were collected to analyze presence of ketones, occult blood, glucose, and protein in urine. In this dipstick test, the level of occult blood, glucose, ketones and urine protein in urine samples were recorded as negative, trace, 1+ and 2+ indicating proportional concentrations in urine. Only categories with abnormal significant values have been presented. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Urine Ketone, Trace, Day 5,n=2,0,0,2,1,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 2,n=1,0,0,3,1,0
GSK3511294 100mg00

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Week 4 (AUC[0-Week 4]) of GSK3511294

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for AUC (0-Week 4). Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, and 4 post-dose

InterventionDay*microgram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 2mg6.856
GSK3511294 10mg19.685
GSK3511294 30mg62.994
GSK3511294 100mg292.698
GSK3511294 300mg676.055

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Week 26 (AUC [0-Week 26]) of GSK3511294

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for AUC (0-Week 26). Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24 and 26 post-dose

InterventionDay*microgram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 2mg21.829
GSK3511294 10mg64.453
GSK3511294 30mg199.893
GSK3511294 100mg805.359
GSK3511294 300mg1789.451

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Week 12 (AUC[0-Week 12]) of GSK3511294

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for AUC (0-Week 12). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 post-dose

InterventionDay*microgram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 2mg16.102
GSK3511294 10mg48.389
GSK3511294 30mg148.798
GSK3511294 100mg663.984
GSK3511294 300mg1445.726

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate

Heart rate was assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours at Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,68 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 2mg-4.2-2.0-1.50.21.72.80.0-1.3-2.3-1.83.3-2.0-0.8-0.2-2.2
GSK3511294 10mg-3.3-3.2-1.71.34.71.2-1.8-5.2-1.5-3.7-2.3-1.71.8-0.70.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate

Heart rate was assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours at Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,68 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg0.91.02.74.73.60.61.41.00.8-0.61.01.73.21.62.6
GSK3511294 30mg0.80.3-4.00.7-1.2-0.1-1.12.1-1.1-4.90.60.8-2.82.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate

Heart rate was assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours at Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,68 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg5.24.8-0.7-1.01.53.05.02.00.5-0.33.02.50.01.80.82.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate

Heart rate was assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours at Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,68 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo2.2-1.0-1.2-0.23.81.1-1.8-4.8-3.2-0.2-1.2-3.2-1.4-2.7-1.00.5-2.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate: Electrocardiogram (ECG)

12-lead ECG were performed in a supine position using an automated ECG machine that calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, QT and corrected QT (QTc) intervals. ECG measurements were performed in triplicate. When multiple ECGs were performed at the same planned timepoint, the average value of each parameter was used. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,68 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 10mg-4.6-6.30.80.45.50.8-2.4-5.9-1.2-2.0-3.3-3.32.5-1.50.7
GSK3511294 2mg-4.3-0.8-0.40.31.51.51.6-2.3-1.6-0.6-1.3-0.4-0.2-0.3-4.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate: Electrocardiogram (ECG)

12-lead ECG were performed in a supine position using an automated ECG machine that calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, QT and corrected QT (QTc) intervals. ECG measurements were performed in triplicate. When multiple ECGs were performed at the same planned timepoint, the average value of each parameter was used. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,68 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg0.30.0-0.33.12.6-0.42.01.7-0.3-0.70.40.61.72.01.3
GSK3511294 30mg0.2-1.3-1.41.53.12.52.41.8-1.6-2.91.81.6-0.32.5-0.2

[back to top]

Apparent Volume of Distribution After Subcutaneous Administration (Vd/F) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for Vd/F. Vd/F was calculated as dose divided by terminal elimination rate constant (lambda_z) *AUC(0-inf). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, and 26 post-dose

InterventionLiters (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 2mg6.113
GSK3511294 10mg9.193

[back to top]

Apparent Clearance Following Subcutaneous Dosing (CL/F) of GSK3511294 2 mg and 10 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for CL/F. CL/F was calculated as dose divided by AUC(0-inf). Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, and 26 post-dose

InterventionLiters per day (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 2mg0.08066
GSK3511294 10mg0.14513

[back to top]

%AUCex of GSK3511294 300 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for %AUCex. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32 and 40 post-dose

InterventionPercentage of AUCex (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 300mg0.9096

[back to top]

%AUCex of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for %AUCex. Pharmacokinetic parameters was calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26 and 36 post-dose

InterventionPercentage of AUCex (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 30mg2.9636
GSK3511294 100mg1.4162

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like hsCRP. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionMilligrams per liter (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,5,6,0,0,6Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg-0.4867-0.4817-0.5867-0.5867-0.5717-0.0967-0.4317-0.25170.1000-0.3300-0.21420.2400-0.13670.4333

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate: Electrocardiogram (ECG)

12-lead ECG were performed in a supine position using an automated ECG machine that calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, QT and corrected QT (QTc) intervals. ECG measurements were performed in triplicate. When multiple ECGs were performed at the same planned timepoint, the average value of each parameter was used. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,68 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg6.84.10.31.93.22.64.91.7-0.90.61.32.21.20.32.33.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Presence of Ketones, Glucose, Occult Blood, and Protein

Urine samples were collected to analyze presence of ketones, occult blood, glucose, and protein in urine. In this dipstick test, the level of occult blood, glucose, ketones and urine protein in urine samples were recorded as negative, trace, 1+ and 2+ indicating proportional concentrations in urine. Only categories with abnormal significant values have been presented. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Occult blood, Trace,Week 4,n=2,1,1,5,0,1Urine Ketone, Trace, Day 4,n=0,0,1,1,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 1,n=2,1,1,3,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 4,n=2,1,1,5,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 18,n=2,1,0,1,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 24,n=1,1,0,4,0,0Urine Protein, 2+, Week 4,n=2,1,1,5,0,1
GSK3511294 10mg0111000

[back to top]

AUC(0-t) of GSK3511294 30 mg and 100 mg

Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for AUC (0-t). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2,3,5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26 and 36 post-dose

InterventionDay*microgram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
GSK3511294 30mg201.434
GSK3511294 100mg830.245

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PR Interval, QRS Interval, QT Interval and QT Interval Corrected by Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Interval

12-lead ECG were performed in a supine position using an automated ECG machine that calculated PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval and QTcF interval. ECG measurements were performed in triplicate. When multiple ECGs were performed at the same planned timepoint, the average value of each parameter was used. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours on Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
PR Interval,2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,6PR Interval,8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 4,n=12,6,6,8,9,6PR Interval,Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6PR Interval,Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6PR Interval,Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0PR Interval,Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6QRS Interval,2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,6QRS Interval,8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 4,n=12,6,6,8,9,6QRS Interval,Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QRS Interval,Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6QRS Interval,Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0QRS Interval,Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6QT Interval,2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,6QT Interval,8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 4,n=12,6,6,8,9,6QT Interval,Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QT Interval,Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6QT Interval,Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0QT Interval,Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6QTcF Interval,2 hours Day1,n=12,6,5,9,8,6QTcF Interval,8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 4,n=12,6,6,8,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6QTcF Interval,Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6QTcF Interval,Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0QTcF Interval,Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo-4.5-4.1-2.72.3-0.61.3-0.3-1.01.7-3.1-2.41.52.31.1-4.3-0.5-13.71.1-0.31.81.40.4-0.52.32.12.01.91.60.60.60.02.9-3.70.0-2.6-7.5-4.9-10.1-12.3-5.95.39.49.4-0.6-6.87.37.12.35.7-6.423.5-0.6-6.8-4.0-6.8-4.9-1.7-0.20.9-0.6-2.8-6.4-0.51.4-1.90.4-3.712.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count (RBC)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like RBC count. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionTrillion cells per liter (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 10mg0.080.130.10-0.100.00-0.18-0.16-0.02-0.05-0.08-0.05-0.080.08
GSK3511294 2mg-0.07-0.08-0.08-0.22-0.37-0.28-0.35-0.23-0.25-0.20-0.27-0.33-0.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count (RBC)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like RBC count. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionTrillion cells per liter (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg0.160.060.040.030.070.110.090.180.190.270.130.200.33
GSK3511294 30mg0.000.01-0.03-0.08-0.03-0.07-0.08-0.13-0.01-0.020.01-0.020.10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count (RBC)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like RBC count. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionTrillion cells per liter (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg0.050.030.100.05-0.02-0.08-0.030.070.000.170.170.120.050.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count (RBC)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like RBC count. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionTrillion cells per liter (Mean)
Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,8,8,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,5,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,5Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=11,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo-0.080.03-0.04-0.18-0.15-0.11-0.18-0.03-0.13-0.02-0.11-0.12-0.100.12-0.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Respiration Rate

Respiration rate was assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours at Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,68 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 10mg0.0-1.0-1.2-0.20.7-1.5-0.20.21.50.30.7-0.7-0.7-0.70.7
GSK3511294 2mg1.20.51.71.5-1.00.70.70.71.50.50.7-0.2-0.70.51.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Respiration Rate

Respiration rate was assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours at Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,68 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg0.82.11.81.22.31.30.40.91.22.30.91.40.71.61.3
GSK3511294 30mg0.31.01.91.10.30.0-0.61.10.40.11.21.41.40.60.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Respiration Rate

Respiration rate was assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours at Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,68 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg2.20.31.50.70.20.0-1.8-0.2-0.50.7-0.31.20.80.31.0-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Respiration Rate

Respiration rate was assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours at Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,68 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo0.8-0.1-0.7-1.0-0.1-1.1-0.5-0.30.5-0.50.00.5-0.8-1.1-1.50.2-2.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

SBP and DBP were assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours at Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionMillimeters of mercury (Mean)
SBP, 2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, 8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6DBP, 2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, 8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 2mg-2.24.2-0.8-2.2-2.20.80.31.00.30.01.24.29.33.2-3.83.32.00.8-1.32.34.83.74.71.35.23.23.36.33.2-0.2
GSK3511294 10mg3.33.06.03.72.31.01.55.87.02.02.33.83.73.28.74.30.53.03.0-1.00.74.36.04.25.51.73.04.03.87.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

SBP and DBP were assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours at Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionMillimeters of mercury (Mean)
SBP, 2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, 8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0DBP, 2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, 8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg-1.84.96.3-0.12.90.41.70.80.9-1.40.02.11.92.92.8-2.2-2.04.7-0.30.10.90.81.91.60.73.63.81.11.82.3
GSK3511294 30mg-0.91.71.81.00.3-2.8-2.74.23.23.15.42.02.97.92.8-2.2-1.3-1.1-2.6-0.2-4.1-0.41.63.13.33.40.75.36.63.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

SBP and DBP were assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours at Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (Mean)
SBP, 2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, 8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6SBP, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6DBP, 2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, 8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6DBP, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg-2.0-2.2-5.3-5.0-3.3-4.70.2-2.8-2.3-1.8-4.2-7.3-2.2-5.8-3.3-5.8-3.8-1.80.0-0.3-2.8-1.50.00.23.80.51.30.52.00.22.0-3.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

SBP and DBP were assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours at Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (Mean)
SBP, 2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, 8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6SBP, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6SBP, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0SBP, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6DBP, 2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, 8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6DBP, Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6DBP, Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0DBP, Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo-0.30.0-2.52.60.8-3.0-0.3-2.6-1.60.7-0.8-0.6-0.83.03.0-3.5-15.0-2.9-0.6-0.20.6-0.1-1.40.61.10.31.30.9-2.1-1.6-0.51.32.30.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Temperature

Temperature was assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours at Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionDegree Celsius (Mean)
2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Category title 2. 8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Category title 3. Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6
GSK3511294 10mg0.130.070.100.020.080.250.180.03-0.02-0.18-0.150.020.08-0.020.02
GSK3511294 2mg0.320.400.230.020.150.130.320.300.200.320.170.180.080.030.48

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Temperature

Temperature was assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours at Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

,
InterventionDegree Celsius (Mean)
2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Category title 2. 8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Category title 3. Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0
GSK3511294 100mg0.030.18-0.010.020.22-0.040.010.080.000.02-0.090.07-0.070.00-0.03
GSK3511294 30mg0.300.24-0.030.130.11-0.070.120.04-0.090.090.090.13-0.020.080.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Temperature

Temperature was assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours at Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionDegree Celsius (Mean)
2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Category title 2. 8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Category title 3. Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
GSK3511294 300mg0.000.35-0.050.120.020.120.18-0.08-0.030.130.00-0.05-0.02-0.220.08-0.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Temperature

Temperature was assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 2 and 8 hours at Day 1; Days 2, 3, 4 and 5; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionDegree Celsius (Mean)
2 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Category title 2. 8 hours Day1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Category title 3. Day 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 3,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Day 5,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 1,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 2,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 4,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 8,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 12,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 18,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 24,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 26,n=12,6,6,9,9,6Week 32,n=6,6,6,0,0,6Week 36,n=6,0,0,9,9,0Week 40,n=2,0,0,0,0,6
Placebo0.050.13-0.01-0.10-0.03-0.08-0.13-0.29-0.230.00-0.10-0.07-0.07-0.08-0.300.22-0.10

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAE)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events that may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed before; is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Up to Week 40

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AEAny SAE
GSK3511294 100mg90
GSK3511294 10mg60
GSK3511294 2mg20
GSK3511294 300mg40
GSK3511294 30mg80
Placebo110

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

AESIs were defined as Hypersensitivity (narrow) and Injection site reactions like hematoma and swelling. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Up to Week 40

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HypersensitivityInjection Site Reaction: hematomaInjection Site Reaction: swelling
GSK3511294 100mg000
GSK3511294 10mg000
GSK3511294 2mg000
GSK3511294 300mg011
GSK3511294 30mg100
Placebo011

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Binding to GSK3511294

Serum samples were collected to determine the presence of anti-GSK3511294 binding antibodies using a validated bioanalytical method. Data for any time post-Baseline is reported. The results were categorized as negative, transient positive (defined as a single confirmatory positive immunogenic response that does not occur at the final study assessment) and persistent positive (defined as a confirmatory positive immunogenic response for at least 2 consecutive assessments or a single result at the final study assessment). (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Up to Week 40

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NegativeTransient positivePersistent positive
GSK3511294 100mg711
GSK3511294 10mg501
GSK3511294 2mg600
GSK3511294 300mg501
GSK3511294 30mg405
Placebo1200

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Presence of Ketones, Glucose, Occult Blood, and Protein

Urine samples were collected to analyze presence of ketones, occult blood, glucose, and protein in urine. In this dipstick test, the level of occult blood, glucose, ketones and urine protein in urine samples were recorded as negative, trace, 1+ and 2+ indicating proportional concentrations in urine. Only categories with abnormal significant values have been presented. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Occult blood, Trace,Week 4,n=2,1,1,5,0,1Urine Ketone, Trace,Day 2,n=1,2,0,2,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Day 5,n=2,0,0,2,1,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 1,n=2,1,1,3,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 2,n=1,0,0,3,1,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 4,n=2,1,1,5,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 18,n=2,1,0,1,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 24,n=1,1,0,4,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace,Week 32,n=1,0,0,0,0,0Urine Protein, 2+, Week 4,n=2,1,1,5,0,1Urine Protein, Trace, Week 8,n=1,0,0,2,0,0Urine Protein, Trace, Week 18,n=2,1,0,1,0,0
Placebo111111111111

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Presence of Ketones, Glucose, Occult Blood, and Protein

Urine samples were collected to analyze presence of ketones, occult blood, glucose, and protein in urine. In this dipstick test, the level of occult blood, glucose, ketones and urine protein in urine samples were recorded as negative, trace, 1+ and 2+ indicating proportional concentrations in urine. Only categories with abnormal significant values have been presented. (NCT03287310)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 2, 3, 4 and 5, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 26, 32, 36 and 40

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Occult blood, Trace,Week 4,n=2,1,1,5,0,1Urine Ketone, Trace,Day 2,n=1,2,0,2,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Day 4,n=0,0,1,1,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Day 5,n=2,0,0,2,1,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 1,n=2,1,1,3,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 2,n=1,0,0,3,1,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 4,n=2,1,1,5,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 18,n=2,1,0,1,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 24,n=1,1,0,4,0,0Urine Ketone, Trace, Week 26,n=0,0,0,2,0,0Urine Protein, 2+, Week 4,n=2,1,1,5,0,1Urine Protein, Trace, Week 8,n=1,0,0,2,0,0Urine Protein, Trace, Week 18,n=2,1,0,1,0,0
GSK3511294 30mg0000010001000

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting COPD Exacerbations

Participants reporting acute COPD exacerbations during the study period has been presented. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Up to Week 16

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo8
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg1
Nemiralisib 50 mcg6
Nemiralisib 100 mcg4
Nemiralisib 250 mcg4
Nemiralisib 500 mcg3
Nemiralisib 750 mcg17

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Nemiralisib

Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28

InterventionPicograms per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 50 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 100 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 250 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 500 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 750 mcgNA

[back to top]

AUC From Time Zero to Time 't' [AUC(0-t)] of Nemiralisib

Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28

InterventionHours*picograms per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 50 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 100 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 250 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 500 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 750 mcgNA

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to 24 Hours [AUC(0-24)] of Nemiralisib

Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28

InterventionHours*picograms per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 50 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 100 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 250 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 500 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 750 mcgNA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Day 84 Measured Post Bronchodilator

FEV1 is maximal amount of air exhaled forcefully from lungs in 1 second. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 was conducted approximately 10-30 minutes after participant was administered 4 inhalations of albuterol (salbutamol) via MDI using spacer/valved-holding chamber or via one nebulized treatment. Post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1 is latest FEV1 measured prior to first dose of study treatment and post-bronchodilator. Change from Baseline in clinic visit trough FEV1 at Day 84 measured post-bronchodilator is FEV1 measured prior to dosing and post-bronchodilator on Day 84 minus post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1. Bayesian repeated measure model adjusted for Baseline by visit interaction, treatment by visit interaction, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in previous 12 months and gender was used. Posterior adjusted median change from Baseline and 95% highest posterior density (HPD) credible interval (CrI) was presented. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

InterventionLiters (Median)
Placebo0.052
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg0.031
Nemiralisib 50 mcg0.026
Nemiralisib 100 mcg0.014
Nemiralisib 250 mcg0.058
Nemiralisib 500 mcg0.049
Nemiralisib 750 mcg0.049

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Nemiralisib

Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed for concentrations of Nemiralisb. Pharmacokinetic (PK) Population consists of all participants in the Safety population who had at least 1 non-missing PK assessment (Non-quantifiable [NQ] values will be considered as non-missing values). Participants were summarized according to the treatment that they actually received. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28

,,,,,
InterventionPicograms per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Day 14, Pre-dose, n=2, 19, 24, 16, 18, 69Day 14, 0-1 hour, n=4, 19, 24, 15, 18, 67Day 14, >1-6 hours, n=4, 20, 23, 15, 18, 65Day 28, Pre-dose, n=2, 18, 23, 16, 16, 67Day 28, 0-1 hour, n=3, 19, 23, 16, 15, 63Day 28, >1-6 hours, n=3, 18, 23, 16, 14, 64
Nemiralisib 100 mcg142.8253.7231.8129.4253.3211.4
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg113.654.935.023.636.228.1
Nemiralisib 250 mcg416.0767.6657.0315.6807.0598.8
Nemiralisib 50 mcg62.0109.993.160.5104.985.4
Nemiralisib 500 mcg687.31492.01146.7528.31552.21079.5
Nemiralisib 750 mcg1069.61972.01622.7937.61717.61388.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders Using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) on Treatment Days 28, 56, and 84, and Following EXACT Defined Recovery From the Index Exacerbation

The CAT is a short, self-completed, 8-item questionnaire, each item was rated on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 5 (maximum impairment). The total CAT score is calculated by summing the scores of all items and ranges from 0 to 40, higher scores indicating severe condition. The percentage of responders using the CAT is defined as number of participants with a decrease from Baseline in CAT Total Score >=2 on or before Days 28, 56 and 84 divided by total number of participants in the MITT population. Percentage of responders using CAT was derived only for participants with a Baseline CAT Total Score >=2. Analysis was performed using a separate Bayesian logistic regression for each time point adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Days 28, 56 and 84

,,,,,,
InterventionPercentage of responders (Number)
Day 28Day 56Day 84
Nemiralisib 100 mcg396165
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg365055
Nemiralisib 250 mcg386972
Nemiralisib 50 mcg347378
Nemiralisib 500 mcg345560
Nemiralisib 750 mcg256166
Placebo326370

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders on the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score as Measured by the SGRQ for COPD Participants (SGRQ-C) at Days 28, 56, and 84

SGRQ-C is a 40-item questionnaire designed specifically to focus on COPD participants and was scored equivalent to the SGRQ Total Score, ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect worse health-related quality of life. The percentage of responders on the SGRQ Total Score was derived for participants with a Baseline SGRQ Total Score >=4. Percentage of responders on the SGRQ Total Score is defined as number of participants with a decrease from Baseline in SGRQ Total Score >=4 on or before Days 28, 56 and 84 divided by total number of participants in the MITT population. Analysis was performed using a separate Bayesian logistic regression for each time point adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Days 28, 56 and 84

,,,,,,
InterventionPercentage of responders (Number)
Day 28Day 56Day 84
Nemiralisib 100 mcg265563
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg143650
Nemiralisib 250 mcg326068
Nemiralisib 50 mcg195666
Nemiralisib 500 mcg244957
Nemiralisib 750 mcg215362
Placebo215061

[back to top]

Percentage of Rescue-free Days

Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules was used as a rescue medication. Percentage of Rescue-Free Days is defined as sum of the number of days where the number of occasions of rescue medication use is zero within the time-period divided by total number of days with non-missing values within the time-period multiplied by 100 where the time-period is defined as follows: Week 1: Day 1-7; Week 2: Day 8 - 14; Week 3: Day 15-21; Week 4: Day 22-28; Week 5: Day 29-35; Week 6: Day 36-42; Week 7: Day 43-49; Week 8: Day 50-56; Week 9: Day 57-63; Week 10: Day 64-70; Week 11: Day 71-77; Week 12: Day 78 to Day of last dose; Over the 12-Week: Day 1 to Day of last dose. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of treatment and over the Week 12 treatment period

,,,,,,
InterventionPercentage of rescue free days (Mean)
Week 1, n=254, 21, 87, 88, 80, 79, 254Week 2, n=259, 21, 88, 89, 80, 82, 252Week 3, n=256, 21, 90, 88, 80, 81, 245Week 4, n=250, 21, 89, 87, 81, 77, 243Week 5, n=251, 20, 88, 85, 78, 76, 240Week 6, n=250, 20, 86, 84, 78, 72, 234Week 7, n=250, 20, 85, 83, 77, 71, 231Week 8, n=250, 20, 84, 83, 77, 71, 231Week 9, n=244, 20, 82, 81, 76, 71, 229Week 10, n=241, 20, 81, 80, 73, 71, 227Week 11, n=241, 20, 79, 80, 73, 71, 226Week 12, n=240, 20, 78, 80, 73, 70, 225Over 12 Week, n=273, 21, 91, 91, 86, 83, 268
Nemiralisib 100 mcg33.39243.01739.96442.20241.68241.72045.26644.11842.50543.39642.85941.30040.441
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg36.07640.81938.77635.37635.00537.87032.14534.29032.14535.00038.57539.41535.533
Nemiralisib 250 mcg32.58338.57341.19143.19441.02639.19640.40942.91839.47641.49239.33739.98139.631
Nemiralisib 50 mcg29.84932.14531.64332.53135.55235.38435.63433.02932.75932.45635.62437.36933.590
Nemiralisib 500 mcg34.45340.59534.92330.98633.91235.51938.23234.81136.82337.02439.84142.23635.820
Nemiralisib 750 mcg29.77933.63933.00632.39433.16832.35131.97532.35733.60633.48333.12733.90632.743
Placebo34.89841.00238.20439.67838.26240.28741.37342.05839.26840.60839.70141.39039.743

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving the Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT) Definition of Recovery From the Index Exacerbation

EXACT patient-reported outcome (EXACT-PRO), 14-item instrument to capture occurrence, frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations using an electronic diary (eDiary). Total score ranges from 0-100, higher score indicates more severe condition. Participants were required to complete EXACT-PRO every evening; however, on the day of randomization it was to be completed in the morning. Response was decrease in rolling average EXACT Total Score >=9 points from maximum observed value, sustained for >=7 days, with first of 7 days defined as recovery day. Analysis was performed using Bayesian Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in previous 12 months and gender. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Days 14, 28, 56 and 84

,,,,,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Day 14Day 28Day 56Day 84
Nemiralisib 100 mcg29435254
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg27414550
Nemiralisib 250 mcg28425050
Nemiralisib 50 mcg37525959
Nemiralisib 500 mcg24273137
Nemiralisib 750 mcg32425054
Placebo29404951

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Hematology Values

"Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters including: platelets (Pla), red blood cells count, Hemoglobin (Hb), Hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), percentage reticulocytes, neutrophils (Neu), lymphocytes (Lym), monocytes, eosinophils, leukocytes (Leu) and basophils. Participants are counted in the worst case category if their value changes to (low, within range or no change, or high). Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, are recorded in the To w/in Range or No Change category. Participants are counted twice if the participant has values that changed To Low and To High, so the percentages may not add to 100%. Participants with missing baseline value are assumed to have within range value." (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Upto Week 16

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hb,To low, n=260, 20, 90, 90, 84, 81, 254Hb,w/in range/no change,n=260,20,90,90,84,81,254Hb,To high,n=260, 20, 90, 90, 84, 81, 254Leu,To low,n=259, 20, 90, 90, 83, 78, 251Leu,w/in range/no change,n=259,20,90,90,83,78,251Leu,To high, n=259,20,90,90,83,78,251Lym,To low, n=256, 20, 85, 88, 82, 77, 249Lym,w/in range/no change,n=256,20,85,88,82,77,249Lym,To high,n=256,20,85,88,82,77,249Neu, To low, n=256,20,85,88,82,77,249Neu,w/in range/no change,n=256,20,85,88,82,77,249Neu,To high, n=256,20,85,88,82,77,249Pla,To low, n=253, 19, 88, 90, 84, 78, 245Pla,w/in range/no change,n=253,19,88,90,84,78,245Pla,To high, n=253,19,88,90,84,78,245
Nemiralisib 100 mcg0900074167765176110900
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg02000164119001730190
Nemiralisib 250 mcg0840063207705068140840
Nemiralisib 50 mcg090008196790173110880
Nemiralisib 500 mcg0810062162732060170780
Nemiralisib 750 mcg02531020150112261222133402450
Placebo026000211488239932153802530

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Pulse Rate

"The DBP, SBP and pulse rate were measured with participants seated at least 5 minutes before the assessments. Participants are counted in the worst case category if their value changes to (low, within range or no change, or high). Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, are recorded in the To w/in Range or No Change category. Participants are counted twice if the participant has values that changed To Low and To High, so the percentages may not add to 100%. Participants with missing baseline value are assumed to have within range value." (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Up to Week 16

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DBP, To lowDBP, To within range/no changeDBP, To highPulse rate, To lowPulse rate,To within range/no changePulse rate, To highSBP, To lowSBP, To withinn range/no changeSBP, To high
Nemiralisib 100 mcg091109023827
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg317102101182
Nemiralisib 250 mcg479508262798
Nemiralisib 50 mcg385308475833
Nemiralisib 500 mcg482208353806
Nemiralisib 750 mcg7256302588823919
Placebo82603126551125010

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Clinical Chemistry Values

"Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including: blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Crt), glucose (Glu), potassium (Pot), sodium (Sod), calcium (Cal), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total and direct bilirubin, total protein and albumin (Alb). Participants are counted in the worst case category if their value changes to (low, within range or no change, or high). Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, are recorded in the To w/in Range or No Change category. Participants are counted twice if the participant has values that changed To Low and To High, so the percentages may not add to 100%. Participants with missing baseline value are assumed to have within range value." (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Upto Week 16

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Alb,To low, n=266, 21, 91, 90, 87, 85, 263Alb,w/in range/no change,n=266,21,91,90,87,85,263Alb,To high,n=266,21,91,90,87,85,263Cal,To low, n=266, 21, 90, 90, 87, 85, 263Cal,w/in range/no change,n=266,21,90,90,87,85,263Cal,To high, n=266,21,90,90,87,85,263Crt,To low, n=266, 21, 91, 90, 87, 85, 263Crt,w/in range/no change,n=266,21,91,90,87,85,263Crt,To high, n=266,21,91,90,87,85,263Glu,To low, n=266, 21, 91, 90, 87, 85, 263Glu,w/in range/no change,n=266,21,91,90,87,85,263Glu,To high, n=266,21,91,90,87,85,263Pot,To low, n=266, 21, 90, 90, 87, 85, 263Pot,w/in range/no change,n=266,21,90,90,87,85,263Pot,To high, n=266,21,90,90,87,85,263Sod,To low, n=266, 21, 91, 90, 87, 85, 263Sod,w/in range/no change,n=266,21,91,90,87,85,263Sod,To high, n=266,21,91,90,87,85,263BUN,To low, n=266, 21, 91, 90, 87, 85, 263BUN,w/in range/no change,n=266,21,91,90,87,85,263BUN,To high, n=266,21,91,90,87,85,263
Nemiralisib 100 mcg0900090078211890090009002862
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg0210021031800210021002100210
Nemiralisib 250 mcg1851087048030870086108702850
Nemiralisib 50 mcg09010900108100910090009103880
Nemiralisib 500 mcg1840184097600850084108503820
Nemiralisib 750 mcg226101262032231002630026210263062534
Placebo226401265027237202660026420266072563

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

A single 12-lead ECG with a 15-second rhythm strip was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, QT and corrected QT (QTc) intervals. Abnormal ECG findings are presented. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Screening, Days 14, 84, 112 and at early withdrawal

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ScreeningDay 14Day 84Day 112Early withdrawal
Nemiralisib 100 mcg373327281
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg1088110
Nemiralisib 250 mcg282924253
Nemiralisib 50 mcg252422282
Nemiralisib 500 mcg211818201
Nemiralisib 750 mcg867464754
Placebo938879773

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs), SAEs and AE of Special Interest (AESI)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability, is a congenital anomaly/ birth effect and other important medical events. Safety Population consists of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Participants were summarized according to treatment that they actually received. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any non-SAEAny SAEAny AESI
Nemiralisib 100 mcg191310
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg120
Nemiralisib 250 mcg251621
Nemiralisib 50 mcg14910
Nemiralisib 500 mcg36629
Nemiralisib 750 mcg1012693
Placebo31239

[back to top]

Mean Severity of Subsequent Health Care Resource Use (HCRU) Exacerbations Defined by EXACT

Severity of subsequent HCRU-defined exacerbations defined by EXACT was defined as the highest EXACT Total Score (not using the 3-day Rolling Average) during the period from date of onset of the subsequent HCRU-exacerbation until date of EXACT-defined recovery of subsequent exacerbation. EXACT-PRO, 14-item instrument to capture occurrence, frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations using an eDiary. Total score ranges from 0-100, higher score indicates more severe condition. For participants with more than one subsequent exacerbation, severity was calculated for each subsequent exacerbation. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Up to Week 12

,,,,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Moderate/Severe, n=66, 3, 23, 25, 26, 15, 78Moderate, n=55, 3, 15, 23, 17, 10, 63Severe, n=13, 1, 9, 3, 10, 6, 20
Nemiralisib 100 mcg50.550.055.3
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg64.660.083.0
Nemiralisib 250 mcg47.546.349.5
Nemiralisib 50 mcg59.857.464.0
Nemiralisib 500 mcg57.653.864.1
Nemiralisib 750 mcg51.950.058.8
Placebo53.353.154.0

[back to top]

Mean Number of Occasions of Rescue Medication Use Per Day

Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules was used as a rescue medication. Rescue medication use was recorded as the number of occasions of rescue medication use each day. The mean number of occasions of rescue medication use per day is defined as sum of the number of occasions of rescue medication use each day within the time-period divided by the total number of days with non-missing values within the time-period. Over the 12-Week treatment period is defined as Day 1 to Day of last dose. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of treatment and over the Week 12 treatment period

,,,,,,
InterventionNo. of occasions of rescue use per day (Mean)
Week 1, n=254, 21, 87, 88, 80, 79, 254Week 2, n=259, 21, 88, 89, 80, 82, 252Week 3, n=256, 21, 90, 88, 80, 81, 245Week 4, n=250, 21, 89, 87, 81, 77, 243Week 5, n=251, 20, 88, 85, 78, 76, 240Week 6, n=250, 20, 86, 84, 78, 72, 234Week 7, n=250, 20, 85, 83, 77, 71, 231Week 8, n=250, 20, 84, 83, 77, 71, 231Week 9, n=244, 20, 82, 81, 76, 71, 229Week 10, n=241, 20, 81, 80, 73, 71, 227Week 11, n=241, 20, 79, 80, 73, 71, 226Week 12, n=240, 20, 78, 80, 73, 70, 225Over 12 Week, n=273, 21, 91, 91, 86, 83, 268
Nemiralisib 100 mcg1.9261.7121.6931.7201.7501.7921.6971.6161.6581.5961.6021.6711.750
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg2.1122.2312.0212.1902.3292.3782.4792.7362.7652.5432.1642.3862.330
Nemiralisib 250 mcg1.6701.4971.4881.4891.5351.6361.6281.5721.7201.5461.6721.7121.620
Nemiralisib 50 mcg1.6331.4691.4951.5141.5331.3821.5311.5531.6081.5891.4041.4141.553
Nemiralisib 500 mcg1.9171.6111.7422.0091.9491.9361.8992.0061.9531.9271.9261.7901.921
Nemiralisib 750 mcg1.7471.5871.6551.7071.7371.7801.8261.8241.7751.7051.7161.7311.733
Placebo1.6991.6501.7291.6841.7351.7411.7031.6561.7081.6981.7291.6661.684

[back to top]

Change From Hospital Discharge in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 Measured Pre and Post-bronchodilator

Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as maximal amount of air exhaled forcefully from the lungs in 1 second. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 was conducted approximately 10 to 30 minutes after participant was administered with 4 inhalations of albuterol via MDI using a spacer/valved-holding chamber or via 1 nebulized treatment. Pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1 is defined as latest FEV1 measured prior to first dose of study treatment and pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator, respectively. Change from hospital discharge in clinic visit trough FEV1 at Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 measured pre- and post-bronchodilator is defined as FEV1 measured prior to dosing and pre- and post-bronchodilator on Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 minus pre and post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Baseline and pre- and post-bronchodilator on Days 14, 28, 56 and 84

,,,,,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
Day 14, Pre, n=20, 2, 8, 8, 6, 4, 20Day 14, Post, n=5, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 5Day 28, Pre, n=37, 2, 14, 8, 10, 9, 37Day 28, Post, n=22, 2, 8, 1, 4, 4, 22Day 56, Pre, n=37, 2, 14, 8, 9, 10, 36Day 56, Post, n=22, 2, 7, 1, 4, 5, 21Day 84, Pre, n=37, 2, 12, 8, 7, 10, 35Day 84, Post, n=22, 2, 6, 1, 4, 5, 22
Nemiralisib 100 mcg-0.0490.310-0.0850.1300.0140.098-0.0810.108
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg0.3550.4310.2610.3340.1060.139-0.0270.133
Nemiralisib 250 mcg-0.069-0.3050.0120.009-0.074-0.056-0.0720.021
Nemiralisib 50 mcg0.0690.1190.0120.1300.0190.0420.1210.037
Nemiralisib 750 mcg0.002-0.021-0.046-0.094-0.054-0.135-0.062-0.106
Placebo0.0820.0560.0260.0340.019-0.0140.007-0.039

[back to top]

Change From Hospital Discharge in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 Measured Pre and Post-bronchodilator

Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as maximal amount of air exhaled forcefully from the lungs in 1 second. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 was conducted approximately 10 to 30 minutes after participant was administered with 4 inhalations of albuterol via MDI using a spacer/valved-holding chamber or via 1 nebulized treatment. Pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1 is defined as latest FEV1 measured prior to first dose of study treatment and pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator, respectively. Change from hospital discharge in clinic visit trough FEV1 at Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 measured pre- and post-bronchodilator is defined as FEV1 measured prior to dosing and pre- and post-bronchodilator on Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 minus pre and post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Baseline and pre- and post-bronchodilator on Days 14, 28, 56 and 84

InterventionLiters (Mean)
Day 14, Pre, n=20, 2, 8, 8, 6, 4, 20Day 28, Pre, n=37, 2, 14, 8, 10, 9, 37Day 28, Post, n=22, 2, 8, 1, 4, 4, 22Day 56, Pre, n=37, 2, 14, 8, 9, 10, 36Day 56, Post, n=22, 2, 7, 1, 4, 5, 21Day 84, Pre, n=37, 2, 12, 8, 7, 10, 35Day 84, Post, n=22, 2, 6, 1, 4, 5, 22
Nemiralisib 500 mcg0.1730.0300.007-0.042-0.0720.0430.006

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SGRQ Total Score at Days 28, 56 and 84

SGRQ-C is a 40-item questionnaire designed specifically to focus on COPD participants and was scored equivalent to SGRQ Total Score, ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect worse health-related quality of life. Scores on a scale were calculated as 100 multiplied by summed weights from positive items in questionnaire divided by sum of weights of all items in questionnaire. Baseline (Day 1) is defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in SGRQ Total Score is defined as SGRQ Total Score on Days 28, 56 and 84 minus Baseline SGRQ Total Score. Analysis was performed using Bayesian repeated measures model adjusting for Baseline by visit interaction, treatment by visit interaction, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in previous 12 months and gender. Posterior adjusted median change from Baseline and 95% HPD CrI was presented (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 28, 56 and 84

,,,,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Day 28, n=232, 19, 86, 78, 77, 72, 225Day 56, n=227, 20, 78, 77, 74, 68, 219Day 84, n=218, 17, 74, 74, 69, 60, 209
Nemiralisib 100 mcg-10.6-10.7-11.3
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg-5.7-3.9-6.6
Nemiralisib 250 mcg-10.9-11.3-10.9
Nemiralisib 50 mcg-8.2-9.3-9.3
Nemiralisib 500 mcg-7.8-8.9-9.4
Nemiralisib 750 mcg-7.9-8.4-7.9
Placebo-7.7-8.0-9.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 Measured Pre and Post-bronchodilator

Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as maximal amount of air exhaled forcefully from the lungs in 1 second. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 was conducted approximately 10-30 minutes after participant was administered with 4 inhalations of albuterol via MDI using a spacer/valved-holding chamber or via 1 nebulized treatment. Pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1 is latest FEV1 measured prior to first dose of study treatment and pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator, respectively. Change from Baseline in clinic visit trough FEV1 at Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 measured pre-bronchodilator is defined as FEV1 measured prior to dosing and pre-bronchodilator on Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 minus pre-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 14, 28, 56 (pre and post bronchodilaor), 84 (pre-bronchodilator) and at hospital discharge (maximum 24 Weeks)

,,,,,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
Day 14, Pre, n=240, 20, 85, 83, 76, 76, 238Day 14, Post, n=248, 20, 86, 83, 77, 78, 241Day 28, Pre, n=239, 20, 82, 79, 75, 71, 232Day 28, Post, n=245, 19, 83, 81, 76, 72, 232Day 56, Pre, n=230, 20, 78, 76, 73, 67, 224Day 56, Post, n=237, 19, 78, 77, 74, 69, 224Day 84, Pre, n=210, 17, 71, 73, 66, 58, 212Hospital discharge, Pre, n=23, 2, 8, 8, 7, 3, 22Hospital discharge, Post, n=8, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 6
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg0.1000.0750.0810.059-0.006-0.0020.0030.1680.153
Nemiralisib 250 mcg0.0530.0540.0640.0490.0220.0260.0150.0520.094
Nemiralisib 50 mcg-0.0210.010-0.0340.004-0.024-0.012-0.0490.1080.083
Nemiralisib 100 mcg-0.013-0.050-0.010-0.0340.0110.0040.0050.056-0.076
Nemiralisib 750 mcg0.0230.0440.0200.029-0.0010.0110.0100.075-0.006
Placebo0.0080.0340.0170.0360.0050.0200.0000.0710.134

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 Measured Pre and Post-bronchodilator

Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as maximal amount of air exhaled forcefully from the lungs in 1 second. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 was conducted approximately 10-30 minutes after participant was administered with 4 inhalations of albuterol via MDI using a spacer/valved-holding chamber or via 1 nebulized treatment. Pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1 is latest FEV1 measured prior to first dose of study treatment and pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator, respectively. Change from Baseline in clinic visit trough FEV1 at Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 measured pre-bronchodilator is defined as FEV1 measured prior to dosing and pre-bronchodilator on Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 minus pre-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 14, 28, 56 (pre and post bronchodilaor), 84 (pre-bronchodilator) and at hospital discharge (maximum 24 Weeks)

InterventionLiters (Mean)
Day 14, Pre, n=240, 20, 85, 83, 76, 76, 238Day 14, Post, n=248, 20, 86, 83, 77, 78, 241Day 28, Pre, n=239, 20, 82, 79, 75, 71, 232Day 28, Post, n=245, 19, 83, 81, 76, 72, 232Day 56, Pre, n=230, 20, 78, 76, 73, 67, 224Day 56, Post, n=237, 19, 78, 77, 74, 69, 224Day 84, Pre, n=210, 17, 71, 73, 66, 58, 212Hospital discharge, Pre, n=23, 2, 8, 8, 7, 3, 22
Nemiralisib 500 mcg0.0410.0730.0160.027-0.004-0.0110.0070.162

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CAT Total Score

The CAT is a short, self-completed, 8-item questionnaire, each item was rated on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 5 (maximum impairment). The total CAT score was calculated by summing the scores of all items and ranges from 0 to 40, higher scores indicating more severe condition. Baseline (Day 1) is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in CAT Total Score is defined as CAT Total Score on Days 28, 56 and 84 minus Baseline CAT Total Score. Analysis was performed using Bayesian repeated measures model adjusting for Baseline by visit interaction, treatment by visit interaction, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender. Posterior adjusted median change from Baseline and 95% HPD CrI has been presented. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Baseline and at Days 28, 56 and 84

,,,,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Day 28, n=234, 19, 86, 80, 77, 74, 229Day 56, n=231, 20, 78, 77, 76, 69, 222Day 84, n=218, 17, 75, 75, 69, 62, 213
Nemiralisib 100 mcg-3.9-4.5-5.1
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg-2.3-1.9-2.7
Nemiralisib 250 mcg-5.1-4.8-4.7
Nemiralisib 50 mcg-4.0-3.4-3.5
Nemiralisib 500 mcg-3.1-3.8-3.8
Nemiralisib 750 mcg-4.7-4.4-4.2
Placebo-4.7-4.2-4.6

[back to top]

Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of Nemiralisib

Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28

InterventionHours (Median)
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 50 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 100 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 250 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 500 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 750 mcgNA

[back to top]

Rate of Moderate and Severe Exacerbations Over 12-week Treatment Period

Moderate COPD exacerbations are defined as worsening symptoms of COPD treated with short-acting bronchodilators (SABDs) plus antibiotics and/or oral/systemic corticosteroids. Severe COPD exacerbations are defined as worsening symptoms of COPD that require hospitalization or visit to the emergency room. Severe exacerbation may also be associated with acute respiratory failure. Rate of exacerbations was analyzed using Bayesian Poisson model adjusting for length of on-treatment follow-up, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender. Posterior median exacerbation rate and 95% HPD CrI has been presented. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Up to Week 12

InterventionNo.of exacerbation per 84 Days (Median)
Placebo0.31
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 50 mcg0.29
Nemiralisib 100 mcg0.28
Nemiralisib 250 mcg0.32
Nemiralisib 500 mcg0.20
Nemiralisib 750 mcg0.36

[back to top]

Plasma Drug Concentration at Pre-dose (Ctrough) of Nemiralisib

Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28

InterventionPicograms per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 50 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 100 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 250 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 500 mcgNA
Nemiralisib 750 mcgNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Time to Recovery From Index Exacerbation Using EXACT- PRO Tool

Time to EXACT-defined recovery from index exacerbation is defined as time from the date of randomization until date of the first EXACT-defined recovery day during the 12-Week Treatment Period. EXACT-defined recovery from the index exacerbation is defined as a decrease in the Rolling Average EXACT total Score >=9 points from the Maximum Observed Value, sustained for >=7 days, with the first of the 7 days defined as the recovery day. Analysis was performed using a Bayesian Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender. Number of participants reporting events is presented. (NCT03345407)
Timeframe: From randomization to Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo141
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg11
Nemiralisib 50 mcg54
Nemiralisib 100 mcg50
Nemiralisib 250 mcg45
Nemiralisib 500 mcg34
Nemiralisib 750 mcg149

[back to top]

Number of Secondary Care Visits for Asthma Conditions or COPD

The number of secondary care visits (that is, inpatient hospitalization and emergency department [ED]) for asthma conditions or COPD were summarized using data from EHR-based healthcare utilization (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

,
InterventionVisits (Number)
Inpatient hospitalizationED visits
Asthma Cohort00
COPD Cohort00

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Received Short-acting Beta-agonist Therapy

Participants who received SABA were summarized using data from EHR-based healthcare utilization. (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Asthma Cohort85
COPD Cohort85

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score-asthma Cohort Only

The ACT is a validated self-administered questionnaire utilizing 5 questions to assess asthma control on a 5-point categorical scale (1 to 5). Total score was calculated as the sum of scores from 5 questions and ranged from 5 to 25. Higher scores indicated better control of asthma. Week 1 was considered as Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at the specified time point minus Baseline value. (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1) and Weeks 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Week 5, n=72Week 9, n=54Week 13, n=62Week 17, n=59Week 21, n=47Week 25, n=46
Asthma Cohort000000

[back to top]

Median Rescue Medication Use

The use of rescue medication by participants were monitored by attaching a sensor to rescue inhaler. (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25

,
InterventionOccasions per day (Median)
Week 1Week 5Week 9Week 13Week 17Week 21Week 25
Asthma Cohort0.30.20.10.1000
COPD Cohort0.60.40.30.30.30.30.3

[back to top]

PROactive Difficulty Domain Score

The PROactive tool is used to investigate dimensions of physical activity (symptoms, distress, difficulties, amount etc.) that are judged as being essential by participants living with COPD. The clinic visit version of the PRO was used in this study, and was offered via the participant's electronic PRO application every 28 days. This version of the PRO includes 14 items, measuring a physical activity 'Total Score' with 2 domains ('amount' and 'difficulty'). The 'difficulty' domain is covered by 10 items. The difficulty domain score is based on the simple addition of items (0 to 40), which is then scaled from 0 (worse) to 100 (much better). (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and 26

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Week 2, n=68, 83Week 6, n=57, 77Week 10, n=54, 65Week 14, n=49, 56Week 18, n=39, 41Week 22, n=47, 50Week 26, n=28, 37
Asthma Cohort84.5868283838686
COPD Cohort666365666165.565

[back to top]

PROactive Amount Domain Score

The PROactive tool is used to investigate dimensions of physical activity (symptoms, distress, difficulties, amount etc.) that are judged as being essential by participants living with COPD. The clinic visit version of the PRO was used in this study, and was offered via the participant's electronic PRO application every 28 days. This version of the PRO includes 14 items, measuring a physical activity 'Total Score' with 2 domains (amount and difficulty). The amount domain is covered by 2 items (amount of walking outside and chores outside) and by 2 activity monitor outputs (vector magnitude units per minute [VMU/min] and steps per day). Amount domain score is based on the simple addition of items (scale ranging from 0 to 15) and then scaled from 0 to 100. (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and 26

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Week 2, n=54, 58Week 6, n=40, 52Week 10, n=35,36Week 14, n=36, 36Week 18, n=22, 22Week 22, n=21, 23Week 26, n=15, 12
Asthma Cohort61615759616161
COPD Cohort52545752525254

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Maintenance Compliance

The use of maintenance therapy by participants were monitored by attaching a sensor to maintenance inhaler. (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Week 1Week 5Week 9Week 13Week 17Week 21Week 25
Asthma Cohort68595452484846
COPD Cohort64565450484948

[back to top]

Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Active Total Score

The PROactive tool is used to investigate dimensions of physical activity (symptoms, distress, difficulties, amount etc.) that are judged as being essential by participants living with COPD. The clinic visit version of PRO was used, and was offered via the participant's electronic PRO application every 28 days. This version of PRO includes 14 items, measuring a physical activity 'Total Score' with 2 domains ('amount' and 'difficulty'). The 'amount' domain is covered by 2 items (amount of walking outside and chores outside) and by 2 activity monitor outputs (vector magnitude units per minute [VMU/min] and steps per day). The 'difficulty' domain is covered by 10 items. Each domain score is based on the simple addition of items (scale ranging from 0 to 15 for amount domain and 0 to 40 for difficulty domain), and then scaled from 0 to 100. 'Total Score' is calculated as the sum of the two domains (amount and difficulty) divided by two, thus scored from 0 (worse) to 100 (much better). (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and 26

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Week 2, n=54, 58Week 6, n=40, 52Week 10, n=35,36Week 14, n=36, 36Week 18, n=22, 22Week 22, n=21, 23Week 26, n=15, 12
Asthma Cohort75757373.57576.575.5
COPD Cohort60.35962.558.557.556.558

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score-COPD Cohort Only

The CAT is an 8 item questionnaire (cough, sputum, chest tightness, breathlessness, going up hills/stairs, activity limitation at home, confidence leaving the home, and sleep and energy) that measures health status of participants with COPD. Participants completed each question by rating their experience on a 6 point scale ranging from 0 (maximum impairment) to 5 (no impairment). Total score was calculated by summing the non-missing scores on the eight items and ranged from 0-40. Higher scores indicated greater disease impact. Week 1 was considered as Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at the specified time point minus Baseline value. (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1) and Weeks 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Week 5, n=71Week 9, n=67Week 13, n=60Week 17, n=56Week 21, n=50Week 25, n=48
COPD Cohort0010.51.50

[back to top]

Number of Primary Care Visits for Asthma Conditions or COPD

The number of primary care visits (including ambulatory, home and phone) for asthma conditions or COPD were summarized using data from EHR-based healthcare utilization. (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

,
InterventionVisits (Number)
AmbulatoryHomePhone
Asthma Cohort2314
COPD Cohort792117

[back to top]

Number of Participants With New Prescriptions

New treatments that were prescribed for respiratory-related conditions (Short-acting beta-agonists [SABA], Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta-agonist [LABA] combinations, Oral corticosteroids [OCS], Leukotriene modifiers [LEUK], ICS, Long-acting muscarinic antagonists [LAMA], SABA/short-acting muscarinic antagonist [SAMA] combinations, Anti-cholinergics [a-CHOL], LABA/LAMA, ICS/LABA/LAMA, Phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitors [PDE4], Anti-immunoglobulin E [a-IgE], LABA, and Interleukin-5 inhibitors [IL-5]) were summarized using data from EHR-based healthcare utilization. Some participants may have received prescriptions in more than one medication category. (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SABAICS/LABAOCSLEUKICSLAMASABA/SAMAa-CHOLLABA/LAMAICS/LABA/LAMAPDE4a-IgELABAIL-5
Asthma Cohort8559333730692000222
COPD Cohort854852141535228988110

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

FEV1 is an important measure of pulmonary function and is the maximum amount of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured using spirometry. Participants were given a hand-held spirometer with instructions on its proper use. Baseline (Week 1) measurement was taken in clinic and the participants were instructed to perform home spirometry on a weekly basis for the remainder of the study. The spirometry use was linked to the Propeller Health application on the iPad, which provided visual cues for the spirometry and sent the data to the central database after completion of the session. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at specified time point minus Baseline value. Change from Baseline in FEV1 at 4-weekly intervals is presented. (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1) and Weeks 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

,
InterventionLiter (Median)
Week 5, n=61, 44Week 9, n=61,39Week 13, n=57, 40Week 17, n=54, 38Week 21, n=33, 28Week 25, n=26, 14
Asthma Cohort-0.03-0.09-0.06-0.11-0.07-0.12
COPD Cohort0.07-0.08-0.10-0.15-0.19-0.10

[back to top]

Number of All Primary Care Visits

The number of all primary care visits (including ambulatory, home and phone) were summarized using data from EHR-based healthcare utilization (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

,
InterventionVisits (Number)
AmbulatoryHomePhone
Asthma Cohort426787
COPD Cohort59855116

[back to top]

Number of All Secondary Care Visits

The number of all secondary care visits (that is, inpatient hospitalization and ED) were summarized using data from EHR-based healthcare utilization (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

,
InterventionVisits (Number)
Inpatient hospitalizationED visits
Asthma Cohort00
COPD Cohort00

[back to top]

Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS) in COPD Total Score-COPD Cohort Only

The E-RS: COPD scale is a derivative instrument used to measure the effect of treatment on the severity of respiratory symptoms in stable COPD. The E-RS utilizes the 11 respiratory symptom items contained in the 14-item Exacerbations of Chronic pulmonary disease Tool (EXACT). For the COPD cohort specifically, the daily EXACT was offered each evening. The domains included: respiratory symptoms (RS)-breathlessness (RS-BRL comprised of 5 items, score range [0-17]), RS-cough and sputum (RS-CSP comprised of 3 items, score range [0-11]), and RS-chest symptoms (RS-CSY comprised of 3 items, score range [0-12]). The total score was derived by summing the 11-item scores and ranged between 0-40 with higher values indicating severe respiratory symptoms. Scores for the week were summarized for each COPD participant where they completed the questionnaire on three or more days during the study week (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Week 1, n=72Week 5, n=66Week 9, n=60Week 13, n=56Week 17, n=52Week 21, n=43Week 25, n=41
COPD Cohort16.517.817.115.515.816.315.3

[back to top]

Median Daily Activity Level Based on Vector Magnitude Counts.

The physical activity was captured using a waist-worn accelerometer. Vector magnitude in counts are accelerations in 3 dimensions that indicate activity. More counts is associated with more activity. (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

,
InterventionVector magnitude counts (Median)
Week 1, n=72, 68Week 5, n=53, 54Week 9, n=52, 42Week 13, n=52, 42Week 17, n=47, 37Week 21, n=34, 31Week 25, n=23, 20
Asthma Cohort512475483469490525446
COPD Cohort378415389384342359412

[back to top]

Median Number of Steps Per Day

The physical activity was captured using a waist-worn accelerometer. A valid day was defined as a day where the activity monitor detected that it was worn for at least 8 hours during that day. Data for three or more valid days were required to generate data for weekly step counts. (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

,
InterventionSteps per day (Median)
Week 1, n=72, 68Week 5, n=53, 54Week 9, n=52,42Week 13, n=52, 42Week 17, n=47, 37Week 21, n=34, 31Week 25, n=23, 20
Asthma Cohort3574454732703124396238163431
COPD Cohort2186244623122117158317022239

[back to top]

Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT) Event Rate-COPD Cohort Only

EXACT is a 14-item diary that measures respiratory symptoms and function. The total score for EXACT ranges from 0-100, higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. EXACT events are considered worsening of symptom scores above the individual's Baseline value over multiple consecutive days. (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

InterventionEvents per participant per year (Number)
COPD Cohort2.06

[back to top]

Number of Days in Hospital for Asthma and COPD

The number of days for which the participant was hospitalized for asthma and COPD was summarized using data from EHR-based healthcare utilization (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

InterventionDays (Number)
Asthma Cohort0
COPD Cohort0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Completed Exit Interview

An exit interview were conducted to obtain relevant feedback from participants regarding the study, study devices and electronic PRO platform. Exit surveys were triggered via the study-supplied iPad to each participant when they completed (or withdrew from) the study. (NCT03357341)
Timeframe: Up to 6 Months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Asthma Cohort96
COPD Cohort80

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC0-4

Change from baseline in FEV1 (Forced expiratory volume in 1 second) AUC0-4 (Area under the curve from 0 to 4 hours) (spirometry will be obtained at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes post-dose) normalized for length of follow up. (NCT03364608)
Timeframe: Over 4 hours post dose on Day 1

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
AS MDI 180 µg0.331
AS MDI 90 µg0.263
Proventil 180 µg0.349
Proventil 90 µg0.297
Placebo MDI0.080

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC0-6

Change from baseline in FEV1 (Forced expiratory volume in 1 second) AUC0-6 (Area under the curve from 0 to 6 hours) (spirometry will be obtained at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes post-dose) normalized for length of follow up. (NCT03364608)
Timeframe: Over 6 hours post dose on Day 1

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
AS MDI 180 µg0.266
AS MDI 90 µg0.203
Proventil 180 µg0.282
Proventil 90 µg0.240
Placebo MDI0.070

[back to top]

Peak Change From Baseline in FEV1

Peak Change from baseline in FEV1 (Forced expiratory volume in 1 second) (NCT03364608)
Timeframe: Over 6 hours post dose on Day 1

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
AS MDI 180 µg0.509
AS MDI 90 µg0.433
Proventil 180 µg0.516
Proventil 90 µg0.472
Placebo MDI0.233

[back to top]

Baseline-adjusted FEV1 AUC0-6 After the Last Cumulative Dose

The baseline-adjusted FEV1 AUC0-6 is the area under the curve for change from baseline calculated using the trapezoidal rule and normalized by dividing the AUC by the length of follow up post the last cumulative dose (typically 6 hours) (spirometry will be obtained at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes post-dose) normalized for length of follow up). (NCT03371459)
Timeframe: Over 6 hours post dose on Day 1

InterventionLiter (Least Squares Mean)
AS MDI0.561
Proventil0.602

[back to top]

Baseline-adjusted FEV1 30 Minutes After Each Cumulative Dose

Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation (NCT03371459)
Timeframe: At the two study treatment visits, FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) will be measured prior to drug administration and 5 times, once at 30 minutes after each of the 5 doses

,
InterventionLiter (Least Squares Mean)
Dose 1 - 90 μgCumulative Dose - 180 μgCumulative Dose - 360 μgCumulative Dose - 720 μgCumulative Dose - 1440 μg
AS MDI0.4210.5480.6190.6590.721
Proventil0.4880.5860.6470.6900.805

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Test (ACT) Total Score

The ACT is a validated self-completed questionnaire utilizing 5 questions to assess asthma control on a 5-point categorical scale ranging from 1 (not controlled at all) to 5 (completely controlled). Total score is calculated as the sum of the scores from the 5 questions and can range from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating better control. An ACT total score of 5 to 19 suggests that the participant's asthma is unlikely to be well controlled, whilst a score of 20 to 25 suggests that the participant's asthma is likely to be well controlled. Baseline value was the latest assessment prior to randomization (Day 1, pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. (NCT03380429)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

InterventionScores on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par and HCP3.4
Cohort 2: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par4.3
Cohort 3: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use to Par and HCP4.7
Cohort 4: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use Supplied to Par4.2
Cohort 5: No Data Supplied to Par or HCP3.9

[back to top]

Number of Doses of Rescue Medication Use Between Month 4 and Month 6 as Determined by the Rescue Medication Sensor

Data for rescue medication use was collected by the clip-on sensor for salbutamol MDI which records time and date when the MDI was actuated. Total rescue use was determined by the rescue sensor records of date, time and number of inhaler actuations. The mean number of doses of rescue medicines between Months 4 and 6 when maintenance data was supplied to both the participant and the HCP (Cohort 1); maintenance data was only supplied to participants (Cohort 2); rescue and maintenance data were supplied to participant and HCP (Cohort 3) and rescue and maintenance data only supplied to participant (Cohort 4) versus no data supplied to the participant or HCP (Cohort 5) is summarized. (NCT03380429)
Timeframe: Month 4 to Month 6

InterventionDoses of rescue medication (Mean)
Cohort 1: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par and HCP55.3
Cohort 2: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par40.6
Cohort 3: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use to Par and HCP29.5
Cohort 4: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use Supplied to Par27.0
Cohort 5: No Data Supplied to Par or HCP55.8

[back to top]

Percentage of ELLIPTA Doses Taken (Daily Adherence) Between Month 1 and Month 3 as Determined by the Maintenance Sensor

Daily adherence is defined as the participant taking one dose of Relvar/Breo ELLIPTA, within a 24-hour period, starting at 12.00 a.m. each day of the treatment period. The percentage of ELLIPTA doses taken were determined by the clip-on sensor attached to ELLIPTA, which records the time and date when the ELLIPTA cover was opened and closed. Least Square mean percentage of ELLIPTA doses taken (daily adherence) between Months 1 and 3 was determined by the maintenance sensor daily adherence. The effect on daily adherence to maintenance therapy when maintenance data was supplied to both the participant and the HCP (Cohort 1), maintenance data was only supplied to participants (Cohort 2), rescue and maintenance data were supplied to participant and HCP (Cohort 3), and rescue and maintenance data only supplied to participant (Cohort 4) versus no data supplied to the participant or HCP (Cohort 5) is summarized. (NCT03380429)
Timeframe: Month 1 to Month 3

InterventionPercentage of ELLIPTA doses (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par and HCP85.7
Cohort 2: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par84.2
Cohort 3: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use to Par and HCP82.0
Cohort 4: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use Supplied to Par79.2
Cohort 5: No Data Supplied to Par or HCP76.4

[back to top]

Percentage of ELLIPTA Doses Taken (Daily Adherence) Between Month 1 and Month 6 as Determined by the Maintenance Sensor

Daily adherence is defined as the participant taking one dose of Relvar/Breo ELLIPTA, within a 24-hour period, starting at 12.00 a.m. each day of the treatment period. The percentage of ELLIPTA doses taken were determined by the clip-on sensor attached to ELLIPTA, which records the time and date when the ELLIPTA cover was opened and closed. Least Square mean percentage of ELLIPTA doses taken (daily adherence) between Months 1 and 6 was determined by the maintenance sensor daily adherence. The effect on daily adherence to maintenance therapy when maintenance data was supplied to both the participant and the HCP (Cohort 1), maintenance data was only supplied to participants (Cohort 2), rescue and maintenance data were supplied to participant and HCP (Cohort 3), and rescue and maintenance data only supplied to participant (Cohort 4) versus no data supplied to the participant or HCP (Cohort 5) is summarized. (NCT03380429)
Timeframe: Month 1 to Month 6

InterventionPercentage of ELLIPTA doses (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par and HCP81.5
Cohort 2: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par78.8
Cohort 3: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use to Par and HCP77.7
Cohort 4: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use Supplied to Par75.2
Cohort 5: No Data Supplied to Par or HCP71.8

[back to top]

Percentage of ELLIPTA Doses Taken (Daily Adherence) Between Month 4 and Month 6 as Determined by the Maintenance Sensor

Daily adherence is defined as the participant taking one dose of Relvar/Breo ELLIPTA, within a 24-hour period, starting at 12.00 a.m. each day of the treatment period. The percentage of ELLIPTA doses taken were determined by the clip-on sensor attached to ELLIPTA, which records the time and date when the ELLIPTA cover was opened and closed. Least Square mean percentage of ELLIPTA doses taken (daily adherence) between Months 4 and 6 was determined by the maintenance sensor daily adherence over the last three months of the study period (between months 4 to 6). The effect on daily adherence to maintenance therapy when maintenance data was only supplied to participants (Cohort 2), rescue and maintenance data were supplied to participant and HCP (Cohort 3), and rescue and maintenance data only supplied to participant (Cohort 4) versus no data supplied to the participant or HCP (Cohort 5) is summarized. (NCT03380429)
Timeframe: Month 4 to Month 6

InterventionPercentage of ELLIPTA doses (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 2: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par77.2
Cohort 3: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use to Par and HCP78.3
Cohort 4: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use Supplied to Par77.1
Cohort 5: No Data Supplied to Par or HCP69.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Attaining Asthma Control (Percentage of Participants With an ACT Total Score >=20) at Month 6

Percentage of participants attaining asthma control was defined as participants with an ACT total score >=20 at Month 6. The ACT is a validated self-completed questionnaire utilizing 5 questions to assess asthma control on a 5-point categorical scale ranging from 1 (not controlled at all) to 5 (completely controlled). Total score is calculated as the sum of the scores from the 5 questions and can range from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating better control. An ACT total score of 5 to 19 suggests that the participant's asthma is unlikely to be well controlled, whilst a score of 20 to 25 suggests that the participant's asthma is likely to be well controlled. Percentage of participants who attained asthma control at Month 6 is presented. (NCT03380429)
Timeframe: Month 6

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par and HCP52
Cohort 2: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par66
Cohort 3: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use to Par and HCP55
Cohort 4: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use Supplied to Par53
Cohort 5: No Data Supplied to Par or HCP62

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Have Either an ACT Total Score of >=20 and/or an Increase From Baseline >=3 in ACT Total Score at Month 6

The ACT is a validated self-completed questionnaire utilizing 5 questions to assess asthma control on a 5-point categorical scale ranging from 1 (not controlled at all) to 5 (completely controlled). Total score is calculated as the sum of the scores from the 5 questions and can range from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating better control. Baseline value was the latest assessment prior to randomization (Day 1, pre-dose). Percentage of participants who had either an ACT total score of >=20 and/or an increase from Baseline >=3 in ACT total score at Month 6 is presented. (NCT03380429)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par and HCP66
Cohort 2: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par75
Cohort 3: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use to Par and HCP65
Cohort 4: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use Supplied to Par67
Cohort 5: No Data Supplied to Par or HCP70

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With an Increase From Baseline >=3 in ACT Total Score at Month 6

The ACT is a validated self-completed questionnaire utilizing 5 questions to assess asthma control on a 5-point categorical scale ranging from 1 (not controlled at all) to 5 (completely controlled). Total score is calculated as the sum of the scores from the 5 questions and can range from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating better control. An ACT total score of 5 to 19 suggests that the participant's asthma is unlikely to be well controlled, whilst a score of 20 to 25 suggests that the participant's asthma is likely to be well controlled. Baseline value was the latest assessment prior to randomization (Day 1, pre-dose). Percentage of participants with an increase from Baseline >=3 in ACT total score at Month 6 is presented. (NCT03380429)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par and HCP61
Cohort 2: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par69
Cohort 3: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use to Par and HCP65
Cohort 4: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use Supplied to Par63
Cohort 5: No Data Supplied to Par or HCP64

[back to top]

Percentage of Rescue Free Days Between Month 4 and Month 6 as Determined by the Rescue Medication Sensor

Data for rescue medication use was collected by the clip-on sensor for salbutamol MDI which records time and date when the MDI was actuated. Percentage of rescue free days were determined by the rescue sensor records of date, time and number of inhaler actuations. Least Square mean percentage of rescue free days between Months 4 and 6 when maintenance data was supplied to both the participant and the HCP (Cohort 1); maintenance data was only supplied to participants (Cohort 2); rescue and maintenance data were supplied to participant and HCP (Cohort 3) and rescue and maintenance data only supplied to participant (Cohort 4) versus no data supplied to the participant or HCP (Cohort 5) is summarized. (NCT03380429)
Timeframe: Month 4 to Month 6

InterventionPercentage of rescue free days (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par and HCP81.1
Cohort 2: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par81.2
Cohort 3: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use to Par and HCP85.6
Cohort 4: Data on Maintenance and Rescue Use Supplied to Par83.7
Cohort 5: No Data Supplied to Par or HCP76.4

[back to top]

"Percentage of ELLIPTA Doses Taken (Daily Adherence) Between Month 4 and Month 6 as Determined by the Maintenance Sensor for Arms; (Cohort 1: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Participant and HCP andCohort 5: no Data Supplied to Participant or HCP)"

Daily adherence is defined as the participant taking one dose of Relvar/Breo ELLIPTA, within a 24-hour period, starting at 12.00 anti-meridiem (a.m.) each day of the treatment period. The percentage of ELLIPTA doses taken were determined by the clip-on sensor attached to ELLIPTA, which records the time and date when the ELLIPTA cover was opened and closed. Analysis was carried out by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model. Least Square mean percentage of ELLIPTA doses taken (daily adherence) between Months 4 and 6 was determined by the maintenance sensor daily adherence over the last three months of the study period (between months 4 to 6). The daily adherence to ELLIPTA maintenance therapy when both the participant and the HCP were supplied with data from the maintenance sensor (Cohort 1) versus no data supplied to the participant or HCP (Cohort 5) is summarized. (NCT03380429)
Timeframe: Month 4 to Month 6

InterventionPercentage of ELLIPTA doses (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1: Data on Maintenance Use Supplied to Par and HCP80.9
Cohort 5: No Data Supplied to Par or HCP69.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate

Pulse rate was assessed in the sitting position after approximately 5 minutes rest. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-first-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. (NCT03474081)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Day 84

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 100/62.5/25 mcg0.2
Tiotropium 18 mcg0.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 on Day 28

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 on Day 28 was defined as the average of the two pre-dose FEV1 measurements recorded before the morning dose of randomized study medication on Day 28. Change from Baseline in trough FEV1 on Day 28 was calculated by subtracting Baseline FEV1 value from the trough FEV1 value on Day 28. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the mean of the two assessments made at 30 and 5 minutes pre-dose on Day 1. (NCT03474081)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 [Pre-dose at 30 minutes and 5 minutes]) and Day 28

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 100/62.5/25 mcg0.115
Tiotropium 18 mcg-0.007

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 on Day 84

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 on Day 84 was defined as the average of the two pre-dose FEV1 measurements recorded before the morning dose of randomized study medication on Day 84. Change from Baseline in trough FEV1 on Day 84 was calculated by subtracting Baseline FEV1 value from the trough FEV1 value on Day 84. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the mean of the two assessments made at 30 and 5 minutes pre-dose on Day 1. (NCT03474081)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 [Pre-dose at 30 minutes and 5 minutes]) and Day 84

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 100/62.5/25 mcg0.105
Tiotropium 18 mcg0.018

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) on Day 85

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 on Day 85 was defined as the mean of the two planned spirometry FEV1 measurements. Change from Baseline in trough FEV1 on Day 85 was calculated by subtracting Baseline FEV1 value from the trough FEV1 value on Day 85. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the mean of the two assessments made at 30 and 5 minutes pre-dose on Day 1. (NCT03474081)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 [Pre-dose at 30 minutes and 5 minutes]) and Day 85

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 100/62.5/25 mcg0.115
Tiotropium 18 mcg0.020

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

SBP and DBP were assessed in the sitting position after approximately 5 minutes rest. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-first-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. (NCT03474081)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Day 84

,
InterventionMillimeters of mercury (Mean)
SBPDBP
Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 100/62.5/25 mcg-0.3-0.3
Tiotropium 18 mcg-0.1-0.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other important medical event according to medical or scientific judgement was categorized as SAE. (NCT03474081)
Timeframe: Up to Day 95

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Non-SAEsSAEs
Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 100/62.5/25 mcg3113
Tiotropium 18 mcg2911

[back to top]

Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours at Week 12 for ITT Population

FEV1 is an important measure of pulmonary function and is the maximum amount of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured using spirometry. Serial FEV1 assessments were performed at multiple time points (-30 and -5 minutes pre-dose, and 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours, 21 hours, 23 hours and 24 hours post-dose) over 24-hour period at Week 12. Weighted mean change from Baseline at week 12 was calculated by subtracting weighted mean FEV1 at week 12 from Baseline FEV1, where Baseline FEV1 is the average of the two FEV1 measurements made at 30 minutes and 5 minutes pre-dose on Day 1. The weighted mean was derived by calculating the area under the FEV1 time curve (AUC) over the actual time of assessment relative to the time of dosing (over 24-hour period) using the trapezoidal rule, and then dividing the value by the time interval (24-hour) over which the AUC was calculated. (NCT03478683)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 100/62.5/25 mcg0.046
Budesonide/Formoterol 320/9 mcg Plus Tiotropium 18 mcg0.032

[back to top]

Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 0-24 Hours at Week 12 for Modified Per Protocol (mPP) Population

FEV1 is an important measure of pulmonary function and is the maximum amount of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured using spirometry. Serial FEV1 assessments were performed at multiple time points (-30 and -5 minutes pre-dose, and 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours, 21 hours, 23 hours and 24 hours post-dose) over 24-hour period at Week 12. Weighted mean change from Baseline at week 12 was calculated by subtracting weighted mean FEV1 at week 12 from Baseline FEV1, where Baseline FEV1 is the average of the two FEV1 measurements made at 30 minutes and 5 minutes pre-dose on Day 1. The weighted mean was derived by calculating the area under the FEV1 time curve (AUC) over the actual time of assessment relative to the time of dosing (over 24-hour period) using the trapezoidal rule, and then dividing the value by the time interval (24-hour) over which the AUC was calculated. (NCT03478683)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 100/62.5/25 mcg0.045
Budesonide/Formoterol 320/9 mcg Plus Tiotropium 18 mcg0.030

[back to top]

Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours on Day 1

FEV1 is an important measure of pulmonary function and is the maximum amount of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured using spirometry. Serial FEV1 assessments were performed at multiple time points (-30 and -5 minutes pre-dose, and 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours, 21 hours, 23 hours and 24 hours post-dose) over 24-hour period on Day 1. Weighted mean change from Baseline on Day 1 was calculated by subtracting weighted mean FEV1 on Day 1 from Baseline FEV1, where Baseline FEV1 is the average of the two FEV1 measurements made at 30 minutes and 5 minutes pre-dose on Day 1. The weighted mean was derived by calculating the area under the FEV1 time curve (AUC) over the actual time of assessment relative to the time of dosing (over 24-hour period) using the trapezoidal rule, and then dividing the value by the time interval (24-hour) over which the AUC was calculated. (NCT03478683)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 100/62.5/25 mcg0.054
Budesonide/Formoterol 320/9 mcg Plus Tiotropium 18 mcg0.063

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 on Day 2, Day 28, Day 84 and Day 85

FEV1 is an important measure of pulmonary function and is the maximum amount of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured using spirometry. For Day 2 and Day 85, trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the 23-hour and 24-hour serial spirometry FEV1 measurements. For Day 28 and Day 84, trough FEV1 was defined as the average of the pre-dose FEV1 measurements recorded before the morning dose of randomized study treatment. Change from Baseline in trough FEV1 was calculated by subtracting post-dose trough FEV1 value from Baseline FEV1, where Baseline FEV1 is the average of the two FEV1 measurements made at 30 minutes and 5 minutes pre-dose on Day 1. The treatment effect to be estimated for trough FEV1 was hypothetical effect if all participants stayed on their randomized study treatment. Only on treatment data was included in analysis. (NCT03478683)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 2, 28, 84 and 85

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 2, n=358,359Day 28, n=355,353Day 84, n=344,340Day 85, n=341,337
Budesonide/Formoterol 320/9 mcg Plus Tiotropium 18 mcg0.018-0.015-0.018-0.012
Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 100/62.5/25 mcg0.0080.0460.0400.026

[back to top]

Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 0-24 Hours at Week 12 for Modified Per Protocol (mPP) Population

FEV1 is an important measure of pulmonary function and is the maximum amount of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured using spirometry. Serial FEV1 assessments were performed at multiple time points (-30 and -5 minutes pre-dose, and 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours, 21 hours, 23 hours and 24 hours post-dose) over 24-hour period at Week 12. Weighted mean change from Baseline at week 12 was calculated by subtracting weighted mean FEV1 at week 12 from Baseline FEV1, where Baseline FEV1 is the average of the two FEV1 measurements made at 30 minutes and 5 minutes pre-dose on Day 1. The weighted mean was derived by calculating the area under the FEV1 time curve (AUC) over the actual time of assessment relative to the time of dosing (over 24-hour period) using the trapezoidal rule, and then dividing the value by the time interval (24-hour) over which the AUC was calculated. (NCT03478696)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 100/62.5/25 mcg0.039
Budesonide/Formoterol 320/9 mcg Plus Tiotropium 18 mcg0.029

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 on Day 2, Day 28, Day 84 and Day 85

FEV1 is an important measure of pulmonary function and is the maximum amount of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured using spirometry. For Day 2 and Day 85, trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the 23-hour and 24-hour serial spirometry FEV1 measurements. For Day 28 and Day 84, trough FEV1 was defined as the average of the pre-dose FEV1 measurements recorded before the morning dose of randomized study treatment. Change from Baseline in trough FEV1 was calculated by subtracting post-dose trough FEV1 value from Baseline FEV1, where Baseline FEV1 is the average of the two FEV1 measurements made at 30 minutes and 5 minutes pre-dose on Day 1. The treatment effect to be estimated for trough FEV1 was hypothetical effect if all participants stayed on their randomized study treatment. Only on treatment data was included in analysis. (NCT03478696)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 2, 28, 84 and 85

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 2, n=355,341Day 28, n=353,354Day 84, n=346,343Day 85, n=343,342
Budesonide/Formoterol 320/9 mcg Plus Tiotropium 18 mcg-0.010-0.019-0.030-0.022
Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 100/62.5/25 mcg0.0150.0440.0240.029

[back to top]

Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours at Week 12 for ITT Population

FEV1 is an important measure of pulmonary function and is the maximum amount of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured using spirometry. Serial FEV1 assessments were performed at multiple time points (-30 and -5 minutes pre-dose, and 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours, 21 hours, 23 hours and 24 hours post-dose) over 24-hour period at Week 12. Weighted mean change from Baseline at week 12 was calculated by subtracting weighted mean FEV1 at week 12 from Baseline FEV1, where Baseline FEV1 is the average of the two FEV1 measurements made at 30 minutes and 5 minutes pre-dose on Day 1. The weighted mean was derived by calculating the area under the FEV1 time curve (AUC) over the actual time of assessment relative to the time of dosing (over 24-hour period) using the trapezoidal rule, and then dividing the value by the time interval (24-hour) over which the AUC was calculated. (NCT03478696)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 100/62.5/25 mcg0.040
Budesonide/Formoterol 320/9 mcg Plus Tiotropium 18 mcg0.023

[back to top]

Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours on Day 1

FEV1 is an important measure of pulmonary function and is the maximum amount of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured using spirometry. Serial FEV1 assessments were performed at multiple time points (-30 and -5 minutes pre-dose, and 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours, 21 hours, 23 hours and 24 hours post-dose) over 24-hour period on Day 1. Weighted mean change from Baseline on Day 1 was calculated by subtracting weighted mean FEV1 on Day 1 from Baseline FEV1, where Baseline FEV1 is the average of the two FEV1 measurements made at 30 minutes and 5 minutes pre-dose on Day 1. The weighted mean was derived by calculating the area under the FEV1 time curve (AUC) over the actual time of assessment relative to the time of dosing (over 24-hour period) using the trapezoidal rule, and then dividing the value by the time interval (24-hour) over which the AUC was calculated. (NCT03478696)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 100/62.5/25 mcg0.045
Budesonide/Formoterol 320/9 mcg Plus Tiotropium 18 mcg0.041

[back to top]

Pharmacodynamic Endpoint Post-dose PC20

"The primary pharmacodynamic endpoint is the post-dose PC20, which is the provocative concentration of methacholine challenge agent required to reduce the forced expiry volume in one second (FEV1) by 20%, following the administration of different doses of albuterol (or placebo) by inhalation.~Primary analysis group -pharmacodynamic population." (NCT03528577)
Timeframe: Approximately 15 minutes after last inhalation of study product

Interventionmg/mL (Mean)
Primary Analysis Group114

[back to top]

Maximum % Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1)

"The change in FEV1 from before to after the exercise induced bronchoconstriction test.~For the control condition, the change in FEV1 was measured from before the 6min exercise challenge test to up to 30 min after the exercise challenge test. The control condition was completed before participants were randomized to either albuterol or interval warm-up. This control condition is our reference condition because any improvement noted with albuterol or interval warm-up exercise should be compared against the control condition." (NCT03586544)
Timeframe: The change in FEV1 will be assessed for up to 30 minutes after completing the exercise induced bronchoconstriction test

,
Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
ControlAlbuterolInterval Warm up
Albuterol First1.917.981.12
Interval Warm-up First-0.8413.03-1.72

[back to top]

Total Annualized Dose of Systemic Corticosteroid (SCS)

This endpoint includes all systemic corticosteroids (SCS) taken in response to a severe exacerbation event from randomization up to randomized treatment discontinuation or a change in maintenance therapy. All SCS are standardized to equipotent doses of prednisone before deriving the total dose. The total annualized dose is calculated as the total dose of SCS divided by the duration of the randomized treatment period. (NCT03769090)
Timeframe: From randomization up to discontinuation of randomized treatment or a change in maintenance therapy. The mean and median reporting period for all participants was 44 and 48 weeks, respectively.

InterventionMilligram(s) (Mean)
BDA MDI 160/180 μg (Full Analysis Set; >=12 Years)86.2
AS MDI 180 μg (Full Analysis Set; >=12 Years)129.3
BDA MDI 80/180 μg (Full Analysis Set)95.5
AS MDI 180 μg (Full Analysis Set)127.1

[back to top]

Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for Participants Aged 12 Years and Older (AQLQ+12) - Number of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 24

The AQLQ+12 consists of 32 questions in 4 domains and is assessed on separate 7-point Likert scales from 1 to 7, with higher values indicating better health-related quality of life. The overall score is the mean of all responses. A responder is defined as a participant with an increase from baseline to week 24 AQLQ-12 score of at least 0.5. (NCT03769090)
Timeframe: From baseline to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BDA MDI 160/180 μg (Full Analysis Set; >=12 Years)508
BDA MDI 80/180 μg (Full Analysis Set; >=12 Years)489
AS MDI 180 μg (Full Analysis Set; >=12 Years)461

[back to top]

Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) - Number of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 24

The ACQ-5 consists of 5 questions on symptom control, with each scored on a 7-point scale (0 = excellent asthma control; 6 = extremely poor control). The overall score (0 = excellent asthma control; 6 = extremely poor control, so a lower score is the better outcome) is the mean of the 5 symptom items. A responder is defined as a participant with a decrease from baseline to Week 24 overall ACQ-5 score of 0.5 or more. ACQ-5 is not validated for children less than 6 years old, data for participants who were 4 or 5 years old was excluded from the analysis of ACQ-5. (NCT03769090)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BDA MDI 160/180 μg (Full Analysis Set; >=12 Years)677
AS MDI 180 μg (Full Analysis Set; >=12 Years)630
BDA MDI 80/180 μg (Full Analysis Set)681
AS MDI 180 μg (Full Analysis Set)650

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Severe Asthma Exacerbation Event

Time to first severe asthma exacerbation will be calculated as the time from randomization until the start date of the first severe asthma exacerbation. An asthma exacerbation will be considered severe if it results in at least one of the following: a temporary bolus/burst of systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 consecutive days to treat symptoms of asthma worsening (a single depo-injectable dose of corticosteroids will be considered equivalent), an emergency room or urgent care visit (<24 hours in the facility for evaluation and treatment) due to asthma that required systemic corticosteroids, or an in-patient hospitalization (admission to an in-patient facility and/or ≥ 24 hours in a healthcare facility) due to asthma. The descriptive summary shows the number of participants with a severe exacerbation event, occurring between the date of randomization up to the date of randomized treatment discontinuation or a change in maintenance therapy. (NCT03769090)
Timeframe: From randomization up to a discontinuation of randomized treatment or a change in maintenance therapy. The mean and median reporting period for all participants was 44 and 48 weeks, respectively.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BDA MDI 160/180 μg (Full Analysis Set; >=12 Years)207
AS MDI 180 μg (Full Analysis Set; >=12 Years)266
BDA MDI 80/180 μg (Full Analysis Set)241
AS MDI 180 μg (Full Analysis Set)276

[back to top]

Annualized Severe Exacerbation Rate

The annualized severe exacerbation rate (severe exacerbations per year) is estimated from a negative binomial model with treatment, age group, region, and number of severe exacerbations in the last 12 months prior to randomization as categorical covariates. The logarithm of the time at risk is included as an offset variable. (NCT03769090)
Timeframe: From randomization up to discontinuation of randomized treatment or a change in maintenance therapy. The mean and median reporting period for all participants was 44 and 48 weeks, respectively.

InterventionSevere exacerbations per year (Least Squares Mean)
BDA MDI 160/180 μg (Full Analysis Set; >=12 Years)0.45
AS MDI 180 μg (Full Analysis Set; >=12 Years)0.59
BDA MDI 80/180 μg (Full Analysis Set)0.49
AS MDI 180 μg (Full Analysis Set)0.61

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Concentration Curve From 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6 Hours) Over 12 Weeks

Lung function will be measured by spirometry. Baseline FEV1 will be taken as the average of the 60- and 30-minute pre-dose spirometry measures on or before randomization. Starting with the first study drug dose at Week 0 and then at Week 12, spirometry assessments will be completed at 60 and 30 minutes before the morning dose and 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes after dosing. FEV1 AUC0-6 hours will be calculated for changes from baseline (randomization visit) using the trapezoidal rule and will be normalized by dividing by the time (in hours) from dosing to the last measurement included (typically 6 hours). (NCT03847896)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionmilliliters (Least Squares Mean)
BDA MDI (PT027) 160/180 μg258.6
BDA MDI (PT027) 80/180 μg242.2
BD MDI (PT008) 160 µg178.0
AS MDI (PT007) 180 µg157.2
Placebo MDI96.7

[back to top]

Time to 15% Increase in FEV1 Over the Pre-treatment Value on Day 1

The time to onset is defined as the time (minutes) from the first inhalation of randomized treatment (Day 1) to the first instance where a percentage change from baseline in FEV1 of at least 15% is observed. Participants were only to be included in the analysis if a percent change from baseline of at least 15% is observed within a nominal 30 minutes post dose assessment time point. Baseline FEV1 is defined as the average of the 30- and 60- minute pre-dose spirometry measures taken at randomization. (NCT03847896)
Timeframe: From first dose (first inhalation of randomized treatment) up to about 40 minutes post-dose (Day 1).

Interventionminutes (Median)
BDA MDI (PT027) 160/180 μg7.5
BDA MDI (PT027) 80/180 μg7.0
BD MDI (PT008) 160 µg17.0
AS MDI (PT007) 180 µg9.5
Placebo MDI14.0

[back to top]

Duration of 15% Increase in FEV1 Over the Pre-treatment Value on Day 1

The duration of onset is defined as the time (minutes) of the continual period in which a percentage increase change from baseline in FEV1 of at least 15% is observed. Participants will only be included in the analyses if a percent change from baseline of at least 15% is observed within a nominal 30 minutes post dose assessment. If a participant has multiple periods of onset, only the first will contribute to the summary. Duration of onset can last up to the last assessment during a nominal 6 hour serial spirometry profile. Baseline FEV1 is defined as the average of the 60- and 30- minute pre-dose spirometry taken at randomization. (NCT03847896)
Timeframe: Onset up to about 40 minutes post-treatment, with duration lasting up to the last assessment of a nominal 6 hour serial spirometry profile (Day 1).

InterventionMinutes (Median)
BDA MDI (PT027) 160/180 μg185.5
BDA MDI (PT027) 80/180 μg174
BD MDI (PT008) 160 µg98
AS MDI (PT007) 180 µg158.5
Placebo MDI229.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1

Trough FEV1 is calculated at each clinic visit as the average of the 30- and 60-minute pre-dose FEV1 measurements. Baseline FEV1 is defined as the average of the 30- and 60-minute pre-dose measures collected on the day of randomization. (NCT03847896)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionmilliliters (Least Squares Mean)
BDA MDI (PT027) 160/180 μg135.5
BDA MDI (PT027) 80/180 μg123.5
BD MDI (PT008) 160 µg108.9
AS MDI (PT007) 180 µg2.7
Placebo MDI35.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 at Week 1.

Trough FEV1 is calculated at each clinic visit as the average of the 60- and 30-minute pre-dose FEV1 measurements. Baseline FEV1 is defined as the average of the 60- and 30-minute pre-dose measures collected on the day of randomization. (NCT03847896)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 week

Interventionmilliliters (Least Squares Mean)
BDA MDI (PT027) 160/180 μg107.2
BDA MDI (PT027) 80/180 μg72.0
BD MDI (PT008) 160 µg93.4
AS MDI (PT007) 180 µg-0.8
Placebo MDI41.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Difference on the Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) at Week 12.

A responder is defined as a participant who achieves a reduction from baseline in overall ACQ-7 score of at least 0.5. The ACQ-7 has 7 questions, with each question using a 7 point scale, where 0 = totally controlled and 6 = extremely poorly controlled. The overall ACQ-7 score is defined as the averaged score across the 7 questions. The analysis only includes participants who are uncontrolled at basellne, i.e. baseline ACQ-7 >= 1.5. All participants who discontinue treatment prior to Week 12 are classified as non-responders. (NCT03847896)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BDA MDI (PT027) 160/180 μg107
BDA MDI (PT027) 80/180 μg108
BD MDI (PT008) 160 µg100
AS MDI (PT007) 180 µg77
Placebo MDI88

[back to top]

System Usability Scale (SUS) Overall Score

The SUS was used to explore device acceptability and usability for participants in the DS group. It covered a variety of aspects of system usability, such as the need for support, training, and complexity, and thus giving a global view of subjective assessments of usability. It was a 10-question tool (with five response options; from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree) that provided a composite measure, ranging from 0 to 100, of the overall usability of the system being studied. Higher scores represent better usability level for the tool. (NCT03890666)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Digital System (DS)79.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) Illness Comprehensibility Subscale Score at Week 12

The BIPQ was a 9-item questionnaire designed to rapidly assess cognitive and emotional representations of illness. Only one item assesses illness comprehensibility or coherence of illness (Item 7: How well do you feel you understand your illness?). This item was rated using a 0 (do not understand at all) to 10 (understand very clearly) response scale. A higher score indicates a stronger illness comprehensibility. (NCT03890666)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Concurrent Control (CC)0.1
Digital System (DS)0.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Weekly Short-acting Beta2 Agonist (SABA) Usage at Week 12 for the DS Group

(NCT03890666)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionmcg (Mean)
Digital System (DS)-36.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Number of SABA-free Days at Week 12 for the DS Group

(NCT03890666)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventiondays (Mean)
Digital System (DS)1.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Meaningful Asthma Improvement at the End of 12-Week Treatment Period

Meaningful asthma improvement was defined as an Asthma Control Test (ACT) score of at least 20 at the end of the 12-week treatment period or an increase of at least 3 units on the ACT score from baseline at the end of the 12-week treatment period. The ACT was a simple, participant-completed tool used to assess overall asthma control. The 5 items included in the ACT assess daytime and night-time asthma symptoms, use of reliever medication, and impact of asthma on daily functioning. Each item in the ACT was scored on a 5-point scale, with a summation of all items providing scores ranging from 5 to 25. The scores span the continuum of poor control of asthma (score of 5) to complete control of asthma (score of 25), with a cutoff score of 19 and below indicating participants with poorly controlled asthma. (NCT03890666)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Concurrent Control (CC)54.6
Digital System (DS)61.33

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. SAEs included death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized the participant and required medical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed in this definition. A summary of serious and non-serious AEs regardless of causality is located in 'Reported Adverse Events module'. Number of participants with any AEs, treatment-related AEs, and device-related AEs has been reported. (NCT03890666)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 14

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AEsTreatment-related AEDevice-related AEs
Concurrent Control (CC)2600
Digital System (DS)2810

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in BMQ Necessity Subscale Score at Week 12

The BMQ was used to assess cognitive representations of medicine. The Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire-Specific 11 (BMQ-S11) was an 11-item questionnaire that assessed the representation of medication prescribed for personal use and the BMQ-General assesses beliefs about medicines in general. BMQ necessity is a 5-item scale assessing participant's beliefs about necessity of medications for controlling disease. Participants indicated degree of agreement on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. Scores obtained for individual items were summed, divided by the total number of items and multiplied by 5 to give a total score ranging from 5 to 25 (higher scores=stronger beliefs). (NCT03890666)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Concurrent Control (CC)-0.2
Digital System (DS)-0.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in BIPQ Emotional Representations Subscale Score at Week 12

BIPQ was a 9-item questionnaire designed to rapidly assess cognitive and emotional representations of illness. It comprised 2 items on emotional representation: concern (Item 6: How concerned are you about your illness? Response range 0 [not at all concerned] - 10 [extremely concerned]) and emotions (Item 8: How much does your illness affect you emotionally; for example, does it make you angry, scared, upset or depressed? Response range 0 [not at all affected emotionally] - 10 [extremely affected emotionally]). Total BIPQ Emotional Subscale Score was the sum of above 2 items score and ranged from 0 to 20. A higher score indicates extreme emotional representation. (NCT03890666)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Concurrent Control (CC)-1.1
Digital System (DS)-0.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in BIPQ Cognitive Subscale Score at Week 12

BIPQ was a 9-item questionnaire designed to rapidly assess cognitive and emotional representations of illness. It comprised 5 items on cognitive representation of illness perception: consequences (Item 1: How much does your illness affect your life? Response range 0 [no affect] - 10 [severe affect]), timeline (Item 2: How long do you think your illness will continue? Response range 0 [a very short time] - 10 [forever]), personal control (Item 3: How much control do you feel you have over your illness? Response range 0 [no control] - 10 [extreme amount of control]), treatment control (Item 4: How much do you think your treatment can help your illness? Response range 0 [not at all] - 10 [extremely helpful]), and identity (Item 5: How much do you experience symptoms from your illness? Response range 0 [no symptoms] - 10 [severe symptoms]). Total BIPQ Cognitive Subscale Score was the sum of all item score and ranged from 0 to 50. A higher score indicates stronger illness perception. (NCT03890666)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Concurrent Control (CC)-1.6
Digital System (DS)-2.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) Concern Subscale Score at Week 12

The BMQ was used to assess cognitive representations of medicine. The Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire-Specific 11 (BMQ-S11) was an 11-item questionnaire that assessed the representation of medication prescribed for personal use and the BMQ-General assesses beliefs about medicines in general. BMQ concern is a 6-item scale assessing participant's concerns about potential adverse consequences (range: 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Participants indicated their degree of agreement on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. Scores obtained for individual items were summed, divided by the total number of items and multiplied by 5 to give a total score ranging from 5 to 25 (higher scores=stronger beliefs). (NCT03890666)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Concurrent Control (CC)-0.35
Digital System (DS)-0.72

[back to top]

t[1/2], Terminal Elimination Half-life of Albuterol or Epinephrine

Pharmacokinetic (PK) blood samples will be collected starting 30 minutes before dose and until 24 hours after dose. Plasma will be isolated for analyzing the concentrations of Albuterol and Epinephrine. (NCT04207840)
Timeframe: Samples were drawn at 30 minutes pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120 minutes, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionmin (Geometric Mean)
Primatene Mist, E0047.1
Epinephrine Injection Auto-Injector (Generic of EpiPen)138.8
Albuterol HFA420.7

[back to top]

C[Max], Maximum Plasma Concentration of Albuterol or Epinephrine

Pharmacokinetic (PK) blood samples will be collected starting 30 minutes before dose and until 24 hours after dose. Plasma will be isolated for analyzing the concentrations of Albuterol and Epinephrine. C[max] will be obtained directly from the plot of PK curve. (NCT04207840)
Timeframe: Samples were drawn at 30 minutes pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120 minutes, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Primatene Mist, E004240.8
Epinephrine Injection Auto-Injector (Generic of EpiPen)704.8
Albuterol HFA599.8

[back to top]

AUC(0-tm)_TOT, Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total (Exogenous and Endogenous, if Available) Active Product Ingredient (API) From Time 0 to Time (tm)

Pharmacokinetic (PK) blood samples will be collected starting 30 minutes before dose and until 24 hours after dose. Plasma will be isolated for analyzing the concentrations of Albuterol and Epinephrine. AUC(0-tm)_TOT will be calculated with the trapezoid method. Time tm is defined as the time after C[max] is reached where API concentration is reduced to the levels of the same day baseline. (NCT04207840)
Timeframe: Samples were drawn at 30 minutes pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120 minutes, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionpg/mL x hr (Geometric Mean)
Primatene Mist, E00426.8
Epinephrine Injection Auto-Injector (Generic of EpiPen)509.9
Albuterol HFA3332.3

[back to top]

AUC(0-tm)_DE, Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Exogenous Active Product Ingredient (API) From Time 0 to Time (tm)

Pharmacokinetic (PK) blood samples will be collected starting 30 minutes before dose and until 24 hours after dose. Plasma will be isolated for analyzing the concentrations of Albuterol and Epinephrine. AUC(0-tm)_DE will be calculated with the trapezoid method. Time tm is defined as the time after C[max] is reached where API concentration is reduced to the levels of the same day baseline. (NCT04207840)
Timeframe: Samples were drawn at 30 minutes pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120 minutes, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionpg/mL x hr (Geometric Mean)
Primatene Mist, E00418.4
Epinephrine Injection Auto-Injector (Generic of EpiPen)396.3
Albuterol HFA3332.3

[back to top]

AUC(0-inf), Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Albuterol or Epinephrine From Time 0 to Infinity

Pharmacokinetic (PK) blood samples will be collected starting 30 minutes before dose and until 24 hours after dose. Plasma will be isolated for analyzing the concentrations of Albuterol and Epinephrine. AUC(0-inf) will be calculated with the extrapolation method. (NCT04207840)
Timeframe: Samples were drawn at 30 minutes pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120 minutes, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionpg/mL x hr (Geometric Mean)
Primatene Mist, E00418.4
Epinephrine Injection Auto-Injector (Generic of EpiPen)411.4
Albuterol HFA3650.4

[back to top]

t[Max], Time at Which Maximum Plasma Concentration of Albuterol or Epinephrine is Observed

Pharmacokinetic (PK) blood samples will be collected starting 30 minutes before dose and until 24 hours after dose. Plasma will be isolated for analyzing the concentrations of Albuterol and Epinephrine. t[max] will be obtained directly from the plot of PK curve when the maximum concentration is observed. (NCT04207840)
Timeframe: Samples were drawn at 30 minutes pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120 minutes, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionmin (Geometric Mean)
Primatene Mist, E0042.6
Epinephrine Injection Auto-Injector (Generic of EpiPen)8.3
Albuterol HFA21.8

[back to top]

Maximum Percentage Fall From Post-dose, Pre-exercise Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV₁) Observed up to 60 Minutes Post-exercise Challenge

Lung function was measured by spirometry. Spirometry assessments were completed 5 minutes before dosing, 30 minutes after dosing (baseline; 5 minutes before the exercise challenge), and then 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after the exercise challenge. A reduction in FEV₁ was expected due to the effects of asthma and exercise on breathing and lung function. The percentage fall in FEV₁ was calculated based on the baseline value and maximum percentage fall value during the 60-minute assessment period. (NCT04234464)
Timeframe: Up to 60 minutes post exercise challenge

InterventionMaximum percentage fall FEV₁ (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment Intervention A - BDA MDI 160/180 - All Subjects5.45
Treatment Intervention B - Placebo MDI - All Subjects18.97

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With a Maximum Percentage Fall in FEV₁ Post-exercise Challenge of <10%

The percentage fall in FEV₁ was calculated based on the baseline value and maximum percentage fall value during the 60-minute assessment period, and the percentage of subjects with a maximum percentage fall <10% was determined. (NCT04234464)
Timeframe: Up to 60 minutes post exercise challenge

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Intervention A - BDA MDI 160/180 - All Subjects47
Treatment Intervention B - Placebo MDI - All Subjects17

[back to top]

DPI Responder Analysis in Patients With Suboptimal PIF (<60 L/Min)

"Outcome = the number of subject test days (2 test days per subject) meeting responder criteria defined as:~DPI Responder - a positive (>50 ml) peak FEV1 response 2 hours after Trelegy Ellipta® DPI with a negative (<50mL) peak FEV1 response 30 minutes after Ventolin® pMDI (2.5 hours post Trelegy) DPI Partial Responder a positive (>50 ml) peak FEV1 response 2 hours after Trelegy® Ellipta DPI with a positive (>50 ml) peak FEV1 response 30 minutes after Ventolin® pMDI (2.5 hours post Trelegy) DPI Failure - a negative (<50mL) peak FEV1 response 2 hours after Trelegy Ellipta® DPI with a positive (>50 ml) peak FEV1 response 30 minutes after Ventolin® pMDI (2.5 hours post Trelegy) Irreversible - a negative (<50mL) peak FEV1 response 2 hours after Trelegy Ellipta® DPI with a negative (<50mL) peak FEV1 response 30 minutes after Ventolin® pMDI (2.5 hours post Trelegy)" (NCT04606394)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionNumber of subject test days (Number)
Suboptimal PIF2
Normal PIF1

[back to top]

DPI Responder Analysis in Patients With Reduced PIF (<45 L/Min)

"Outcome = the number of subject test days (2 test days per subject) meeting responder criteria defined as:~DPI Responder - a positive (>50 ml) peak FEV1 response 2 hours after Trelegy Ellipta® DPI with a negative (<50mL) peak FEV1 response 30 minutes after Ventolin® pMDI (2.5 hours post Trelegy) DPI Partial Responder a positive (>50 ml) peak FEV1 response 2 hours after Trelegy® Ellipta DPI with a positive (>50 ml) peak FEV1 response 30 minutes after Ventolin® pMDI (2.5 hours post Trelegy) DPI Failure - a negative (<50mL) peak FEV1 response 2 hours after Trelegy Ellipta® DPI with a positive (>50 ml) peak FEV1 response 30 minutes after Ventolin® pMDI (2.5 hours post Trelegy) Irreversible - a negative (<50mL) peak FEV1 response 2 hours after Trelegy Ellipta® DPI with a negative (<50mL) peak FEV1 response 30 minutes after Ventolin® pMDI (2.5 hours post Trelegy)" (NCT04606394)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionNumber of subject test days (Number)
Reduced PIF2
Normal PIF1

[back to top]

PIF Measurement Techniques

PIF value (L/min) based on different PIF measurement techniques (NCT04606394)
Timeframe: Baseline on day of testing

InterventionL/min (Mean)
Ellipta PIF Standing52
Ellipta PIF Sitting53
Instructed PIF70
Encouraged PIF74
Spiro PIF137

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Number of SABA-free Days at Week 24 for the DS Group

Number of days a participant did not use the rescue medication in a week are reported. (NCT04677959)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventiondays (Mean)
Digital System (DS)0.4

[back to top]

Number of Decreased Doses of Inhaled Medication

Number of participants who received decreased dose of inhaled medication during the 24-week treatment period are reported. (NCT04677959)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard of Care (SoC)0
Digital System (DS)0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Well-Controlled Asthma or Reaching Clinically Important Improvement in Asthma Control

A well-controlled asthma was defined as an Asthma Control Test (ACT) score of greater than or equal to 20. Clinically important improvement in asthma control was defined by an increase of at least 3 ACT units from baseline. The ACT was a simple, participant-completed tool used for the assessment of overall asthma control. The ACT included 5 items that assessed daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, use of reliever medication, and impact of asthma on daily functioning. Each item in the ACT was scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (poor control of asthma) to 5 (well control of asthma), with summation of all items providing scores ranging from 5 to 25. The scores span the continuum of poor control of asthma (score of 5) to complete control of asthma (score of 25), with a cutoff score of 19 and below indicating participants with poorly controlled asthma. (NCT04677959)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard of Care (SoC)112
Digital System (DS)134

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. SAEs included death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized the participant and required medical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed in this definition. A summary of serious and non-serious AEs regardless of causality is located in 'Reported Adverse Events module'. Number of participants with any AEs, and device-related AEs has been reported. (NCT04677959)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 26

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AEsDevice-related AEs
Digital System (DS)773
Standard of Care (SoC)560

[back to top]

System Usability Scale (SUS) Overall Score for DS Group

The SUS was used to explore device acceptability and usability for participants in the DS group. It covered a variety of aspects of system usability, such as the need for support, training, and complexity, and thus giving a global view of subjective assessments of usability. It was a 10-question tool (with five response options; from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree) that provided a composite measure, ranging from 0 to 100, of the overall usability of the system being studied. Higher scores represent better usability level for the tool. (NCT04677959)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SUS Overall Score (completed by participants)Site SUS Overall Score (completed by site)
Digital System (DS)70.073.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) Concern Subscale Score at Week 24

The BMQ was used to assess cognitive representations of medicine. The Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire-Specific 11 (BMQ-S11) was an 11-item questionnaire that assessed the representation of medication prescribed for personal use and the BMQ-General assesses beliefs about medicines in general. BMQ concern is a 6-item scale assessing participant's concerns about potential adverse consequences (range: 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Participants indicated their degree of agreement on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. Scores obtained for individual items were summed, divided by the total number of items and multiplied by 5 to give a total score ranging from 5 to 25 (higher scores=stronger beliefs). (NCT04677959)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Standard of Care (SoC)-0.8
Digital System (DS)-0.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Weekly SABA Usage at Week 24 for the DS Group

(NCT04677959)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionmicrograms (μg) (Mean)
Digital System (DS)-12.26

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Adherence to Maintenance Treatment (FS eMDPI) at Week 24 for the DS Group

Adherence to maintenance treatment was defined as the percentage of actual inhalation doses taken out of the total number of inhalation doses prescribed over the 24- week treatment period. (NCT04677959)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of inhalation (Mean)
Digital System (DS)-10.87

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Asthma Questionnaire Score at Week 24

WPAI-asthma is a self-administered instrument to measure asthma-specific performance impairment of work and regular daily activity within the last 7 days and yields 4 types of scores: work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism or reduced on-the-job effectiveness), overall work impairment (WI) (work productivity loss or absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment (daily activity impairment). Total score and each score ranged from 0 (not affected/no impairment) to 100 (completely affected/impaired). Higher scores indicated greater impairment and less productivity. (NCT04677959)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
AbsenteeismPresenteeismWork productivity lossActivity impairment
Digital System (DS)-0.05-10.43-9.87-15.33
Standard of Care (SoC)-3.56-10.98-12.18-11.22

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in BIPQ Cognitive Subscale Score at Week 24

BIPQ was a 9-item questionnaire designed to rapidly assess cognitive and emotional representations of illness. It comprised 5 items on cognitive representation of illness perception: consequences (Item 1: How much does your illness affect your life? Response range 0 [no affect] - 10 [severe affect]), timeline (Item 2: How long do you think your illness will continue? Response range 0 [a very short time] - 10 [forever]), personal control (Item 3: How much control do you feel you have over your illness? Response range 0 [no control] - 10 [extreme amount of control]), treatment control (Item 4: How much do you think your treatment can help your illness? Response range 0 [not at all] - 10 [extremely helpful]), and identity (Item 5: How much do you experience symptoms from your illness? Response range 0 [no symptoms] - 10 [severe symptoms]). Total BIPQ Cognitive Subscale Score was the sum of all item score and ranged from 0 to 50. A higher score indicates stronger illness perception. (NCT04677959)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Standard of Care (SoC)-2.5
Digital System (DS)-3.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in BMQ Necessity Subscale Score at Week 24

The BMQ was used to assess cognitive representations of medicine. The Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire-Specific 11 (BMQ-S11) was an 11-item questionnaire that assessed the representation of medication prescribed for personal use and the BMQ-General assesses beliefs about medicines in general. BMQ necessity is a 5-item scale assessing participant's beliefs about necessity of medications for controlling disease. Participants indicated degree of agreement on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. Scores obtained for individual items were summed, divided by the total number of items and multiplied by 5 to give a total score ranging from 5 to 25 (higher scores=stronger beliefs). (NCT04677959)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Standard of Care (SoC)-0.4
Digital System (DS)-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) Illness Comprehensibility Subscale Score at Week 24

The BIPQ was a 9-item questionnaire designed to rapidly assess cognitive and emotional representations of illness. Only one item assesses illness comprehensibility or coherence of illness (Item 7: How well do you feel you understand your illness?). This item was rated using a 0 (do not understand at all) to 10 (understand very clearly) response scale. A higher score indicates a stronger illness comprehensibility. (NCT04677959)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Standard of Care (SoC)-0.0
Digital System (DS)0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in BIPQ Emotional Representations Subscale Score at Week 24

BIPQ was a 9-item questionnaire designed to rapidly assess cognitive and emotional representations of illness. It comprised 2 items on emotional representation: concern (Item 6: How concerned are you about your illness? Response range 0 [not at all concerned] - 10 [extremely concerned]) and emotions (Item 8: How much does your illness affect you emotionally; for example, does it make you angry, scared, upset or depressed? Response range 0 [not at all affected emotionally] - 10 [extremely affected emotionally]). Total BIPQ Emotional Subscale Score was the sum of above 2 items score and ranged from 0 to 20. A higher score indicates extreme emotional representation. (NCT04677959)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Standard of Care (SoC)-1.1
Digital System (DS)-1.3

[back to top]

Tmax

Time when the maximal plasma concentration is observed. (NCT04803734)
Timeframe: 0-24 hours

Interventionhr (Mean)
Test Group0.929
Reference Group0.514

[back to top]

T1/2

Terminal elimination half-life, estimated as ln(2)/λ. (NCT04803734)
Timeframe: 0-24 hours

Interventionhr (Mean)
Test Group6.928
Reference Group6.985

[back to top]

MRT

Mean residence time. (NCT04803734)
Timeframe: 0-24 hours

Interventionhr (Mean)
Test Group8.629
Reference Group8.474

[back to top]

AUC(0-inf)

Area under the concentration time curve from time zero to infinity. (NCT04803734)
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose), as well as at 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 minutes, and 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionhr*pg/mL (Mean)
Test Group5204.806
Reference Group5509.006

[back to top]

AUC(0-t)

Area under the concentration time curve from time zero until the last measurable concentration or last sampling time t, whichever occurs first. (NCT04803734)
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose), as well as at 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 minutes, and 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionhr*pg/mL (Mean)
Test Group4806.319
Reference Group5090.449

[back to top]

Cmax

The maximal observed plasma concentration of Albuterol Sulfate. (NCT04803734)
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose), as well as at 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 minutes, and 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Test Group812.477
Reference Group945.456

[back to top]

Kel(λ)

Terminal elimination rate constant, estimated by linear regression analysis of the terminal portion of the ln-concentration vs. time plot. (NCT04803734)
Timeframe: 0-24 hours

Intervention1/hr (Mean)
Test Group0.103
Reference Group0.103

[back to top]

Tmax

Time when the maximal plasma concentration is observed. (NCT05300087)
Timeframe: 0-24 hours

Interventionhr (Mean)
Test Group0.643
Reference Group0.704

[back to top]

AUC(0-inf)

Area under the concentration time curve from time zero to infinity. (NCT05300087)
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose), as well as at 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 minutes, and 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionhr*pg/mL (Mean)
Test Group6236.317
Reference Group6111.557

[back to top]

MRT

Mean residence time. (NCT05300087)
Timeframe: 0-24 hours

Interventionhr (Mean)
Test Group8.731
Reference Group8.753

[back to top]

Kel(λ)

Terminal elimination rate constant, estimated by linear regression analysis of the terminal portion of the ln-concentration vs. time plot. (NCT05300087)
Timeframe: 0-24 hours

Intervention1/hr (Mean)
Test Group0.102
Reference Group0.103

[back to top]

Cmax

The maximal observed plasma concentration of Albuterol Sulfate. (NCT05300087)
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose), as well as at 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 minutes, and 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Test Group996.998
Reference Group979.630

[back to top]

AUC(0-t)

Area under the concentration time curve from time zero until the last measurable concentration or last sampling time t, whichever occurs first. (NCT05300087)
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose), as well as at 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 minutes, and 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionhr*pg/mL (Mean)
Test Group5738.664
Reference Group5620.377

[back to top]

T1/2

Terminal elimination half-life, estimated as ln(2)/λ. (NCT05300087)
Timeframe: 0-24 hours

Interventionhr (Mean)
Test Group7.049
Reference Group7.043

[back to top]