Page last updated: 2024-11-04

ketorolac

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that is used to treat pain and inflammation. It is available as a tablet, injection, and eye drop. Ketorolac is a derivative of the naturally occurring compound, ketorol, which is found in the plant, *Centaurea behen*. It has been shown to inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes, which are involved in the production of prostaglandins, chemicals that cause pain and inflammation. Ketorolac is effective in treating moderate to severe pain, such as pain after surgery, dental procedures, and migraines. It is often used to manage pain associated with inflammatory conditions, such as osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Ketorolac is studied to better understand its mechanism of action, potential therapeutic uses, and to explore potential drug interactions and side effects. '

Ketorolac: A pyrrolizine carboxylic acid derivative structurally related to INDOMETHACIN. It is an NSAID and is used principally for its analgesic activity. (From Martindale The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 31st ed) [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

ketorolac : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of (R)-(+)- and (S)-(-)-5-benzoyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid. While only the (S)-(-) enantiomer is a COX1 and COX2 inhibitor, the (R)-(+) enantiomer exhibits potent analgesic activity. A non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, ketorolac is mainly used (generally as the tromethamine salt) for its potent analgesic properties in the short-term management of post-operative pain, and in eye drops to relieve the ocular itching associated with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. It was withdrawn from the market in many countries in 1993 following association with haemorrhage and renal failure. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

5-benzoyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid : A member of the class of pyrrolizines that is 2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrolizine which is substituted at positions 1 and 5 by carboxy and benzoyl groups, respectively. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID3826
CHEMBL ID469
CHEBI ID76223
CHEBI ID6129
SCHEMBL ID14891
MeSH IDM0112721

Synonyms (95)

Synonym
AC-545
1h-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid, 2,3-dihydro-5-benzoyl-, (+-)-
ketorolacum [latin]
(+-)-5-benzoyl-2,3-dihydro-1h-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid
ketorolac [inn:ban]
ketorolaco [spanish]
(+-)-ketorolac
rs 37619
AB00053682-14
BRD-A40639672-234-05-7
rs-37619
5-(phenylcarbonyl)-2,3-dihydro-1h-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid
66635-83-4
1h-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid, 5-benzoyl-2,3-dihydro
AB00053682
74103-06-3
C07062
ketorolac
ketoralac
DB00465
rac-ketorolac
toradol (tn)
NCGC00185990-01
CHEMBL469
chebi:76223 ,
D08104
ketorolac (inn)
STL018674
FT-0653523
5-benzoyl-2,3-dihydro-1h-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid
NCGC00185990-02
ketorolacum
unii-yzi5105v0l
yzi5105v0l ,
macril
ketorolaco
CCG-204762
cas_74103-07-4
bdbm85511
AKOS005657203
FT-0670664
FT-0670666
NCGC00185990-05
S1646
5-(benzoyl)-2,3-dihydro-1h-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid
gtpl6661
1h-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid, 5-benzoyl-2,3-dihydro, (+/-)-
ketorolac [inn]
(+/-)-5-benzoyl-2,3-dihydro-1h-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid
ketorolac [mi]
ketorolac [vandf]
ketorolac [who-dd]
AB00053682-12
HY-B0580
5-benzoyl-1,2-dihydro-3h-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acid
MLS006011844
ketorolac, ketorolactromethamine, ketorolac tromethamine
smr001550090
SCHEMBL14891
rac-5-benzoyl-2,3-dihydro-1h-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid
CHEBI:6129 ,
KS-5175
1h-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid, 5-benzoyl-2,3-dihydro-
(.+/-.)-5-benzoyl-2,3-dihydro-1h-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid
1h-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid, 2,3-dihydro-5-benzoyl-, (.+/-.)-
5-benzoyl-2,3-dihydro-1h-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid #
(.+/-.)-2,3-dihydro-5-benzoyl-1h-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid
HMS3604J05
AB00053682_16
AB00053682_15
DTXSID8023189 ,
mfcd00864281
5-benzoyl-2,3-dihydro-1h-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acid
AC-1121
F16555
SBI-0050655.P003
ketorolac (nsaid)
FT-0670665
Q2014797
rs37619
BRD-A40639672-234-09-9
SDCCGSBI-0050655.P004
NCGC00185990-15
HMS3884M04
(1rs)-5-benzoyl-2,3-dihydro-1h-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid
A934549
SY107530
toraldar
5-benzoyl-2,3-dihydro-1h-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylicacid
EN300-170843
Z2429420872
ketorolacum (latin)
m01ab15
s01bc05
dtxcid503189

Research Excerpts

Overview

Ketorolac is an effective analgesic but the potential for acute kidney injury (AKI) is concerning, particularly in geriatric "G-60 trauma" patients. It is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory racemic drug with analgesic effects only attributed to its S-enantiomer.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Ketorolac is an effective analgesic but the potential for acute kidney injury (AKI) is concerning, particularly in geriatric "G-60 trauma" patients. "( Identification of Risk Factors for Acute Kidney Injury from Intravenous Ketorolac in Geriatric Trauma Patients.
Barletta, JF; Hall, ST; Mangram, AJ, 2022
)
2.4
"Ketorolac is an opioid sparing agent commonly used in children. "( Ketorolac use and risk of bleeding after appendectomy in children with perforated appendicitis.
Kelley-Quon, LI; Kim, E; Kingston, P; Lascano, D; Ourshalimian, S; Russell, CJ, 2022
)
3.61
"Ketorolac is an effective adjunct in multimodal regimens for postoperative pain control."( Bleeding and ketorolac use in pediatric circumcision.
Davis, RL; Lee, J; Lin, HM; Ouyang, Y; Yudkowitz, FS; Zhou, EP, 2023
)
2
"Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory racemic drug with analgesic effects only attributed to its S-enantiomer. "( Impact of enantiomer-specific changes in pharmacokinetics between infants and adults on the target concentration of racemic ketorolac: A pooled analysis.
Allegaert, K; Cloesmeijer, ME; Daali, Y; Lynn, AM; Mian, P; Olkkola, KT; Smits, A; Tibboel, D; van Esdonk, MJ, 2021
)
2.27
"Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug used as part of multimodal analgesia in women undergoing cesarean delivery. "( Intra-operative ketorolac 15 mg versus 30 mg for analgesia following cesarean delivery: a retrospective study.
Fuller, M; Habib, AS; Pedro, C; Yurashevich, M, 2020
)
2.35
"Ketorolac is an additional low-cost option for conservative management of primary osteoarthritis, and due to its differing mechanism of action, it may not propagate additional cartilage damage or preclude from early surgical intervention if unsuccessful."( Intra-articular Injections of the Hip and Knee With Triamcinolone vs Ketorolac: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Daines, SB; Fuerst, PG; Jurgensmeier, D; Jurgensmeier, K; Kunz, DE; Warth, LC, 2021
)
1.58
"Ketorolac is a reasonable non-narcotic alternative to fentanyl which provides equal pain control and does not increase tube occlusion rates."( Perioperative pain control and tympanostomy tube outcomes.
Adil, E; Irace, AL; Kawai, K; Leung, P; Riley, B, 2020
)
2
"Ketorolac is a frequently used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug due to its excellent disposition in all administration routes; however, it possesses an "analgesic ceiling," which means that higher doses of the drug have no additional analgesic effect."( Periarticular Injection of Ketorolac Augmenting Intravenous Administration of Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Laoruengthana, A; Lohitnavy, M; Mahatthanatrakul, A; Pongpirul, K; Rattanaprichavej, P; Tantimethanon, T, 2022
)
1.74
"Ketorolac tromethamine is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that is extensively used for the management of renal colic in the emergency department (ED). "( Comparison of intravenous ketorolac at three doses for treating renal colic in the emergency department: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
Ahmadi, A; Bahreini, M; Eidinejad, L; Mirfazaelian, H; Thiruganasambandamoorthy, V; Yazdchi, M, 2021
)
2.36
"Ketorolac has proved to be a safe alternative or addition to narcotics in other operations, but has not been thoroughly evaluated in TORS."( Evaluating the risks and benefits of ketorolac in transoral robotic surgery.
Drejet, SM; Mantravadi, AV; Moore, M; Sandelski, MM; Sim, MW; Yesensky, JA; Zimmer, D, 2021
)
1.62
"Ketorolac is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug administered as an analgesic in humans. "( Pharmacokinetics of ketorolac in juvenile loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) after a single intramuscular injection.
Gorges, MA; Gregory, TM; Harms, CA; Lewbart, GA; Papich, MG, 2021
)
2.39
"Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug often administered for pain control after spine surgery. "( The Effect of Ketorolac on Thoracolumbar Posterolateral Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Ajiboye, RM; Drysch, A; Li, J; Orden, MH; Pourtaheri, S; Sharma, A, 2018
)
2.28
"Ketorolac is an effective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, commonly used with local anaesthetics as part of local infiltration analgesia protocols following orthopaedic surgery. "( Randomized controlled trial of intra-articular ketorolac on pain and inflammation after minor arthroscopic knee surgery.
Bjerkeli, V; Gordh, T; Gregersen, I; Halvorsen, B; Rosseland, LA; Solheim, N; Stubhaug, A, 2018
)
2.18
"Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that can be administered for analgesia in these patients."( Ketorolac usage in tonsillectomy and uvulopalatopharyngoplasty patients.
McClain, K; Williams, AM; Yaremchuk, K, 2020
)
2.72
"Ketorolac is a safe and more effective alternative to morphine derivatives for SWL analgesia. "( Efficacy of pethidine, ketorolac, and lidocaine gel as analgesics for pain control in shockwave lithotripsy: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Abol-Enein, H; Atwa, AM; El-Assmy, A; Elbaset, MA; Fadallah, M; Ghobrial, FK; Hashem, A; Laymon, M; Sheir, KZ, 2019
)
2.27
"Ketorolac (KET) is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug approved for the use in humans that possesses a potent analgesic activity, comparable to morphine, and could represent a useful tool to control acute pain also in animals. "( Pharmacokinetics and perioperative efficacy of intravenous ketorolac in dogs.
Beccaglia, M; Cagnardi, P; Carli, S; Fonda, D; Gallo, M; Ravasio, G; Villa, R; Zonca, A, 2013
)
2.08
"Ketorolac appears to be a safe and effective analgesic to use at the time of oocyte retrieval."( The effect of ketorolac on pregnancy rates when used immediately after oocyte retrieval.
Hurst, BS; Kacemi-Bourhim, L; Marshburn, PB; Matthews, M; Mesen, TB; Norton, HJ; Usadi, RS, 2013
)
1.47
"Ketorolac is an attractive alternative for achieving pain control postoperatively, but concerns over postoperative bleeding have limited its use."( Ketorolac does not increase perioperative bleeding: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Gobble, RM; Hoang, HLT; Kachniarz, B; Orgill, DP, 2014
)
2.57
"Ketorolac is a parenterally active nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug with localized anti-inflammatory properties. "( Intraperitoneal ketorolac for post-cholecystectomy pain: a double-blind randomized-controlled trial.
Day, AG; Jalink, D; McMullen, M; Murdoch, J; Orr, E; Phelan, R; Ramsey, G, 2016
)
2.22
"Ketorolac is a potent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug indicated for short term management of moderate to severe post-operative pain. "( Safety of intravenous use of ketorolac in infants following cardiothoracic surgery.
Barclay, CA; Dawkins, TN; Gardiner, RL; Krawczeski, CD, 2009
)
2.09
"Ketorolac is a nonopioid, anti-inflammatory drug commonly used for postoperative analgesia. "( The effects of postoperative ketorolac on wound healing in a rat model.
Eck, JC; Gomez, BA; Yaszemski, MJ, 2009
)
2.09
"Ketorolac is a parenterally available nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug that nonselectively inhibits cyclooxygenase. "( Pharmacokinetics of single-dose intravenous ketorolac in infants aged 2-11 months.
Christians, U; Cohen, MN; Galinkin, J; Henthorn, T; Moll, V; Vu Tran, Z; Zuk, J, 2011
)
2.07
"Ketorolac is a non-selective NSAID which, at low doses, has a preferential COX-1 inhibitory effect and etoricoxib is a new selective COX-2 inhibitor."( Treatment with paracetamol, ketorolac or etoricoxib did not hinder alveolar bone healing: a histometric study in rats.
Fracon, RN; Lamano, T; Moris, IC; Teófilo, JM, 2010
)
1.38
"Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug with known antiplatelet activity that is used for analgesia."( Ketorolac in thyroid surgery: quantifying the risk of hematoma.
Chin, CJ; Franklin, JH; Fung, K; Sowerby, L; Turner, B; Yoo, JH, 2011
)
2.53
"Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug widely used as an adjunct to postoperative pain control in adult and pediatric patients. "( Safety of ketorolac in surgical neonates and infants 0 to 3 months old.
Aldrink, JH; Caniano, DA; Ma, M; Puthoff, T; Wang, W; Wispe, J, 2011
)
2.21
"Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug frequently used to treat postoperative pain."( Perioperative single dose ketorolac to prevent postoperative pain: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Agarwal, D; Benzon, HT; De Oliveira, GS, 2012
)
1.4
"Ketorolac (KT) is an intravenous (IV) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) for acute, moderate pain. "( The safety and efficacy of intravenous ketorolac in patients undergoing primary endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial.
Fargo, K; Moeller, C; Pappas, AL; Pawlowski, J; Welch, K,
)
1.84
"Ketorolac is a member of the pyrrolo-pyrrole group of NSAIDs, and has been available in several formulations for some time, for the treatment of pain. "( Intranasal ketorolac: for short-term pain management.
Garnock-Jones, KP, 2012
)
2.21
"Ketorolac tromethanime is a non steroidal anti inflammatory drug and its efficacy on acute pain control after abdominal surgery has been well documented. "( Efficacy of scheduled time ketorolac administration compared to continuous infusion for post-operative pain after abdominal surgery.
Bevilacqua, F; Cafarotti, S; Di Stasio, E; Marana, E; Russo, A; Scarano, A, 2012
)
2.12
"Ketorolac is a useful adjuvant to lidocaine for IVRA."( An evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of intravenous regional anesthesia with lidocaine and ketorolac using a forearm versus upper arm tourniquet.
Maciolek, H; Manikantan, P; Reuben, SS; Steinberg, RB, 2002
)
1.26
"Ketorolac tromethamine is a well-tolerated, effective medication in the treatment of acute biliary colic."( Comparison of intravenous ketorolac and meperidine in the treatment of biliary colic.
Henderson, SO; Newton, E; Swadron, S, 2002
)
1.34
"Ketorolac is a powerful nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug widely used for pain control in children and adults. "( Use of intravenous ketorolac in the neonate and premature babies.
De Carolis, MP; De Francisci, G; Giannantonio, C; Iacobucci, T; Papacci, P; Romagnoli, C; Zecca, E, 2004
)
2.09
"Ketorolac is a potent nonsteroidal analgesic agent used to treat postoperative pain. "( Prospective randomized trial of ketorolac after congenital heart surgery.
Daggett, C; Drant, S; Gupta, A; Lewis, A; Rivero, N, 2004
)
2.05
"Ketorolac is a potent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. "( The antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of five depot formulations of ketorolac propyl ester in rats.
Chu, CC; Hou, CH; Shieh, JP; Tzeng, JI; Wang, JJ; Wang, LK; Wang, PJ, 2005
)
2
"Ketorolac is a potent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. "( Pharmacokinetics of ketorolac pentyl ester, a novel ester derivative of ketorolac, in rabbits.
Cheng, KI; Chu, CC; Chu, KS; Shieh, JP; Su, WL; Tzeng, JI; Wang, JJ, 2005
)
2.09
"Ketorolac is an injectable nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that is often used as a transitional short-term analgesic to treat moderate pain and to decrease opioid use. "( Safety of ketorolac in neonates and infants after cardiac surgery.
Carberry, KE; Moffett, BS; Mott, AR; Wann, TI, 2006
)
2.18
"Ketorolac is a potent analgesic drug that has been restricted in dosage and use because of its potential adverse effects. "( Report of an anaphylactoid and an anaphylactic reaction to ketorolac in two pediatric surgical patients.
Castillo-Peralta, LA; Castillo-Zamora, C; Nava-Ocampo, AA, 2006
)
2.02
"Ketorolac is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. "( Ketorolac-dextran conjugates: synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
Chaturvedi, SC; Trivedi, P; Vyas, S, 2007
)
3.23
"Ketorolac is a potent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesic used in postoperative pain management. "( How readily does ketorolac penetrate cerebrospinal fluid in children?
Heikkinen, M; Kokki, H; Kumpulainen, E; Laisalmi, M; Lehtonen, M; Rautio, J; Savolainen, J, 2008
)
2.13
"Ketorolac is an analgesic drug known to induce its therapeutic effect by inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis. "( Ionophoretic-like properties of ketorolac for calcium.
Bravo, C; Chàvez, E; Chàvez, R; Corona, N; González, C; Pichardo, J; Reyes-Vivas, H; Uribe, A; Zazueta, C, 1993
)
2.01
"Ketorolac appears to be a useful supplement for analgesia after laparoscopic sterilization, providing improved analgesia as well as decreased recovery time and fewer unplanned admissions."( Ketorolac or pethidine for analgesia after elective laparoscopic sterilization.
Cade, L; Kakulas, P, 1995
)
2.46
"Ketorolac appears to be a safe and effective therapy for children when given in appropriate doses for a limited duration."( Clinical experience with ketorolac in children.
Buck, ML, 1994
)
2.03
"Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal analgesic that may provide postoperative analgesia without opioid-related side effects. "( Evaluation of intravenous ketorolac administered by bolus or infusion for treatment of postoperative pain. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.
Brown, CR; Egan, KJ; Jones, SF; Moodie, JE; Ready, LB; Ross, B; Stahlgren, LH; Tommeraasen, M; Trierwieler, M; Wild, L, 1994
)
2.03
"Ketorolac is a powerful potentiator of morphine antinociception during visceral nociception in the rat. "( Ketorolac potentiates morphine antinociception during visceral nociception in the rat.
Gebhart, GF; Maves, TJ; Meller, ST; Pechman, PS, 1994
)
3.17
"Ketorolac is an effective and popular long-lasting analgesic that is especially useful in the emergency department and postoperatively. "( Ketorolac-precipitated asthma.
Hebert, WG; Scopelitis, E, 1994
)
3.17
"Ketorolac is a new, parenteral, nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory agent. "( Ketorolac versus acetaminophen or ibuprofen in controlling postoperative pain in patients with strabismus.
Morrison, NA; Repka, MX, 1994
)
3.17
"Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agent with opioid-sparing properties. "( Use of ketorolac after lower abdominal surgery. Effect on analgesic requirement and surgical outcome.
Holtmann, B; Parker, RK; Smith, I; White, PF, 1994
)
2.19
"Ketorolac is a beneficial adjuvant to fentanyl PCEA for postoperative pain management after radical retropubic prostatectomy."( Assessment of ketorolac as an adjuvant to fentanyl patient-controlled epidural analgesia after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Bourke, DL; Fischer, K; Grass, JA; Jackson, C; Sakima, NT; Valley, M; Walsh, P, 1993
)
2.09
"Ketorolac is a parenteral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that provides analgesia through a peripheral mechanism. "( Intravenous ketorolac and subarachnoid opioid analgesia in the management of acute postoperative pain.
Byers, RS; Gwirtz, KH; Kim, HC; Kovach, DA; Li, W; Nagy, DJ; Young, JV,
)
1.95
"Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, available in both oral and parenteral forms, that possesses significant analgesic potency. "( The analgesic efficacy of ketorolac for acute pain.
Catapano, MS,
)
1.87
"Ketorolac is a parenteral nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID). "( Comparison of analgesic effect of locally and systemically administered ketorolac in mastectomy patients.
Bosek, V; Cox, CE, 1996
)
1.97
"Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that is indicated for the short-term management of moderately severe, acute pain, that causes analgesia equivalent to that caused by morphine. "( Ketorolac causes the release of methionine-enkephalin in rats.
Domer, FR; Holt, JC; Michel, RE, 1996
)
3.18
"Ketorolac is a new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) having a potent nonopioid analgesic activity. "( Continuous subcutaneous infusion of ketorolac in cancer neuropathic pain unresponsive to opioid and adjuvant drugs. A case report.
De Conno, F; Ripamonti, C; Rodriguez, CH; Ticozzi, C; Zecca, E,
)
1.85
"Ketorolac is an efficient drug for the treatment of moderate to severe pain following minor or intermediate types of surgery. "( Analgesic efficacy of ketorolac.
Wheatley, RG, 1996
)
2.05
"Ketorolac is an effective alternative for patients who may be hypersensitive to narcotic analgesia/sedation."( Colonoscopy by a family physician: a 9-year experience of 1048 procedures.
Hopper, W; Kyker, KA; Rodney, WM, 1996
)
1.02
"Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with strong analgesic activity. "( Ketorolac. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in pain management.
Brogden, RN; Gillis, JC, 1997
)
3.18
"Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with potent analgesic effects and a relatively low incidence of adverse effects. "( Ketorolac for postoperative pain management in children.
Forrest, JB; Heitlinger, EL; Revell, S, 1997
)
3.18
"Ketorolac (K) is a useful addition to lidocaine for i.v. "( The dose-response relationship of ketorolac as a component of intravenous regional anesthesia with lidocaine.
Gardner, G; Reuben, SS; Steinberg, RB, 1998
)
2.02
"Ketorolac is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug approved in the United States for the relief of ocular itching associated with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis."( Comparative evaluation of olopatadine ophthalmic solution (0.1%) versus ketorolac ophthalmic solution (0.5%) using the provocative antigen challenge model.
Abelson, M; Deschenes, J; Discepola, M, 1999
)
1.26
"Ketorolac is a parenteral, nonsteroidal analgesic that does not have a narcotic's risks of respiratory depression, hypotension, or dependence. "( Effect of ketorolac in pediatric sickle cell vaso-occlusive pain crisis.
Givens, TG; Hardwick, WE; King, WD; Lawley, D; Monroe, KW, 1999
)
2.15
"Ketorolac, is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, with strong analgesic activity. "( Solid dispersion of hydroxypropyl beta-cyclodextrin and ketorolac: enhancement of in-vitro dissolution rates, improvement in anti-inflammatory activity and reduction in ulcerogenicity in rats.
Meshram, RN; Nagarsenker, MS; Ramprakash, G, 2000
)
2
"Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication that is used widely for pain management. "( A prospective study comparing i.m. ketorolac with i.m. meperidine in the treatment of acute biliary colic.
Anderson, R; Dula, DJ; Wood, GC, 2001
)
2.03
"Ketorolac is a potent nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID). "( Analgesic efficacy of ketorolac and morphine in neonatal rats.
Barr, GA; Cheng, J; Gupta, A; Wang, S, 2001
)
2.07
"Ketorolac is a potent non-steroidal analgesic with moderate anti-inflammatory effects."( Intra-muscular ketorolac administered as a supplemental analgesic for removal of impacted third molar teeth: a prospective study.
Smith, A; Wright, G, 2002
)
1.39
"Ketorolac is a useful alternative to fentanyl for the treatment of intraoperative pain refractory to the administration of local anesthetic alone during monitored anesthesia care. "( Ketorolac or fentanyl to supplement local anesthesia?
Bosek, V; Cox, C; Smith, DB,
)
3.02
"1. Ketorolac is an investigational non-opioid analgesic. "( Psychomotor effects of ketorolac in comparison with buprenorphine and diclofenac.
Dow, RJ; Gough, KJ; MacDonald, FC; Nicoll, RA, 1989
)
1.21
"Ketorolac is a potent analgesic agent with antiplatelet properties which is known to cross the placenta. "( Effect of maternal ketorolac administration of platelet function in the newborn.
Greer, IA; Johnston, J; Tulloch, I; Walker, JJ, 1988
)
2.05
"Ketorolac is a potent cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor used for the treatment of postoperative pain. "( Haemostatic effects of ketorolac with and without concomitant heparin in normal volunteers.
Bullingham, RE; Forbes, CD; Greer, IA; Lloyd, J; McLaren, M; Spowart, K, 1988
)
2.03

Effects

Ketorolac has an ionophore-like action for calcium, such a drug may transfer calcium through an hydrophobic phase. It has a much longer duration than morphine or meperidine but has a slower onset.

Ketorolac tromethamine has been used for joint infiltration by the orthopedic surgeons as a part of postoperative multimodal analgesia. The NSAID has well-documented opioid-sparing effects in the postoperative period.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Ketorolac has a novel pharmacologic activity conferred by the R-enantiomer and R-ketorolac achieves sufficient levels in the peritoneal cavity to inhibit Rac1 and Cdc42, potentially contributing to the observed survival benefit in women who received ketorolac."( A Novel Pharmacologic Activity of Ketorolac for Therapeutic Benefit in Ovarian Cancer Patients.
Adams, SF; Bedrick, E; Cook, L; Guo, Y; Hudson, LG; Kang, H; Kenney, SR; Lomo, L; Muller, CY; Oprea, TI; Romero, E; Rutledge, T; Sklar, LA; Wandinger-Ness, A; Wiggins, CL, 2015
)
2.14
"Ketorolac has a strong antiplatelet activity and further acts by the inhibition of platelet function, which may last as long as 24 h after the last administration."( Ruptured subcapsular hematoma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy attributed to ketorolac-induced coagulopathy.
Halkic, N; Vuilleumier, H, 2003
)
1.27
"Ketorolac, has an ionophore-like action for calcium, such a drug may transfer calcium through an hydrophobic phase."( [Ketorolac protection in damage due to myocardial ischemia and reperfusion].
Bravo, C; Chávez, E; Chávez, R; Pichardo, J; Zazueta, C,
)
1.76
"Ketorolac has a much longer duration than morphine or meperidine but has a slower onset."( Clinical implications of ketorolac for postoperative analgesia.
Fiedler, MA, 1997
)
1.32
"Ketorolac, a NSAID, has demonstrated opioid-sparing effects in other clinical settings."( Opioid-sparing effects of ketorolac in palliative care patients receiving opioids for chronic cancer-related pain: A systematic literature review.
Butcher, B; Clark, K; Currow, D; Fazekas, B; Hutchings, E; Rowett, D, 2022
)
1.74
"Ketorolac has been added to many of these protocols, but few studies have examined its effects independently."( Scheduled Postoperative Ketorolac Does Not Decrease Opiate Use following Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.
Agarwal, J; Anderson, E; Clinker, C; Eddington, D; Kwok, AC; Marquez, JL; Moss, WD; Sudduth, JD, 2023
)
1.94
"Ketorolac tromethamine has been used for joint infiltration by the orthopedic surgeons as a part of postoperative multimodal analgesia. "( Population Pharmacokinetics of Periarticular Ketorolac in Adult Patients Undergoing Total Hip or Total Knee Replacement Surgery.
Bijoor, M; Gurunathan, U; Maguire, R; Parker, SL; Ramdath, D; Roberts, JA; Wallis, SC, 2019
)
2.22
"Ketorolac has been associated with a lower risk of recurrence in retrospective studies, especially in patients with positive inflammatory markers. "( Intraoperative ketorolac in high-risk breast cancer patients. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Berliere, M; Bouche, G; Coulie, PG; De Kock, M; Decloedt, J; Dekleermaker, A; Duhoux, FP; Forget, P; Guillaume, JE; Ledent, M; Machiels, JP; Mustin, V; Swinnen, W; van Maanen, A; Vander Essen, L; Verougstraete, JC, 2019
)
2.31
"Ketorolac has proved to be a safe alternative or addition to narcotics in other operations, but has not been thoroughly evaluated in TORS."( Evaluating the risks and benefits of ketorolac in transoral robotic surgery.
Drejet, SM; Mantravadi, AV; Moore, M; Sandelski, MM; Sim, MW; Yesensky, JA; Zimmer, D, 2021
)
1.62
"Ketorolac has well-documented opioid-sparing effects in the postoperative period; however, its use is limited because of concerns of postoperative bleeding and hematoma formation."( Perioperative Ketorolac Use and Postoperative Hematoma Formation in Reduction Mammaplasty: A Single-Surgeon Experience of 500 Consecutive Cases.
Firriolo, JM; Labow, BI; Nuzzi, LC; Schmidtberg, LC, 2018
)
1.56
"Ketorolac has been shown to provide quality postoperative pain control and decrease opioid requirement with minimal side effects following spinal surgery. "( The effect of ketorolac on posterior thoracolumbar spinal fusions: a prospective double-blinded randomised placebo-controlled trial protocol.
Bahoura, M; Bono, P; Claus, CF; Dosanjh, A; Houseman, C; Kelkar, P; Lago, D; Lawless, M; Lytle, E; Richards, B; Sigler, D; Slavnic, D; Soo, TM; Tong, D, 2019
)
2.32
"Ketorolac has reported side effects that include dizziness, ear pain, hearing loss, tinnitus, and vertigo in humans, but ketorolac has not been reported to affect the vestibular system in animals."( Effects of acute administration of ketorolac on mammalian vestibular sensory evoked potentials.
Gaines, GC; Jones, TA, 2013
)
1.39
"Ketorolac has been used safely as an analgesic agent for children following cardiac surgery in selected populations. "( Ketorolac as an analgesic agent for infants and children after cardiac surgery: safety profile and appropriate patient selection.
Jalkut, MK,
)
3.02
"Ketorolac has a novel pharmacologic activity conferred by the R-enantiomer and R-ketorolac achieves sufficient levels in the peritoneal cavity to inhibit Rac1 and Cdc42, potentially contributing to the observed survival benefit in women who received ketorolac."( A Novel Pharmacologic Activity of Ketorolac for Therapeutic Benefit in Ovarian Cancer Patients.
Adams, SF; Bedrick, E; Cook, L; Guo, Y; Hudson, LG; Kang, H; Kenney, SR; Lomo, L; Muller, CY; Oprea, TI; Romero, E; Rutledge, T; Sklar, LA; Wandinger-Ness, A; Wiggins, CL, 2015
)
2.14
"Ketorolac has no effect on pain sensitivity, when determining the pain threshold (PT) by method of thermoalgometry."( [Influence of simulated microgravity on the threshold of pain sensitivity in humans with single dose of ketorolac].
Baranov, MV; Chernogorov, RV; Kovalev, AS; Perfilov, DF; Repenkova, LG,
)
1.07
"Ketorolac use has significantly expanded for postoperative pain management since it first became available in the United States, primarily due to well established effects on patient pain scores and its ability to reduce perioperative opioid requirements. "( Safety Considerations in the Use of Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain.
Kodumudi, G; Lipana, L; Maslin, B; Roth, B; Vadivelu, N, 2017
)
2.17
"Ketorolac has similar analgesic efficacy at intravenous doses of 10, 15, and 30 mg, showing that intravenous ketorolac administered at the analgesic ceiling dose (10 mg) provided effective pain relief to ED patients with moderate to severe pain without increased adverse effects."( Comparison of Intravenous Ketorolac at Three Single-Dose Regimens for Treating Acute Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cohen, V; Drapkin, J; Filk, N; Fromm, C; Homel, P; Hossain, R; Huang, F; Likourezos, A; Motov, S; Pushkar, I; Rockoff, B; Smith, A; Yasavolian, M, 2017
)
2.2
"Ketorolac, an NSAID, has low intrinsic permeation capacity through the skin. "( Synthesis of piperazinylalkyl ester prodrugs of ketorolac and their in vitro evaluation for transdermal delivery.
Al-Nabulsi, S; Al-Taani, B; Qandil, A; Tashtoush, B, 2008
)
2.04
"Ketorolac has previously been shown to afford good pain relief in children undergoing surgery. "( Perioperative ketorolac use in children undergoing lower extremity osteotomies.
Directo, MP; Kay, RM; Leathers, M; Myung, K; Skaggs, DL,
)
1.93
"Ketorolac has a strong antiplatelet activity and further acts by the inhibition of platelet function, which may last as long as 24 h after the last administration."( Ruptured subcapsular hematoma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy attributed to ketorolac-induced coagulopathy.
Halkic, N; Vuilleumier, H, 2003
)
1.27
"Ketorolac, has an ionophore-like action for calcium, such a drug may transfer calcium through an hydrophobic phase."( [Ketorolac protection in damage due to myocardial ischemia and reperfusion].
Bravo, C; Chávez, E; Chávez, R; Pichardo, J; Zazueta, C,
)
1.76
"Ketorolac (1mg.kg-1) has not a strong antithrombotic activity. "( [Comparison of the effects of ketorolac and aspirin on hemostasis in the rabbit].
Coriat, P; Daghfous, M; Delaporte-Cerceau, S; Drouet, L; Nafziger, J; Riou, B; Samama, CM, 1995
)
2.02
"Oral ketorolac has been shown to provide analgesia that is the same or better than aspirin, acetaminophen, and dextropropoxyphene with acetaminophen, and equal analgesia to most other commonly available oral analgesics, including ibuprofen and acetaminophen with codeine."( The analgesic efficacy of ketorolac for acute pain.
Catapano, MS,
)
0.89
"Ketorolac tromethamine has few sedative effects and no respiratory depression."( Intravenous ketorolac tromethamine versus meperidine for adjunctive sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a pilot study.
Clarkston, WK; Dies, DF; Schratz, CL, 1996
)
1.39
"Ketorolac tromethamine has been singled out as an NSAID with a distinct gastrotoxicity profile."( Risk of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding associated with ketorolac, other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, calcium antagonists, and other antihypertensive drugs.
Agostinis, L; Cattaruzzi, C; García Rodríguez, LA; Troncon, MG, 1998
)
1.25
"Ketorolac has a much longer duration than morphine or meperidine but has a slower onset."( Clinical implications of ketorolac for postoperative analgesia.
Fiedler, MA, 1997
)
1.32
"If ketorolac has preemptive effects, then there may be an advantage to administering it at the beginning of surgery despite the potential for increased blood loss."( Preemptive analgesic effects of ketorolac in ankle fracture surgery.
Daley, MD; Lindsey, RW; Norman, PH, 2001
)
1.11
"Ketorolac has been used to provide effective postoperative analgesia in children and decreases hospitalization for pediatric patients undergoing ureteroneocystostomy. "( Safety of ketorolac in the pediatric population after ureteroneocystostomy.
Chauhan, RD; Idom, CB; Noe, HN, 2001
)
2.16

Actions

Ketorolac BI can increase the success rate of anesthesia after IANB and BI with articaine in patients with AIP. KetOrolac may cause renal vasoconstriction by cyclooxygenase inhibition.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Ketorolac-based PCA may increase postoperative AKI incidence after RARP; thus, renal function should be monitored in these patients."( Comparison between ketorolac- and fentanyl-based patient-controlled analgesia for acute kidney injury after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.
Bae, YK; Jeon, YT; Kim, DH; Kim, HG; Koo, CH; Oh, AY; Ryu, JH, 2023
)
2.68
"Ketorolac did not increase risk of hemorrhage following tonsillectomy and decreased narcotic use."( Intraoperative ketorolac for pediatric tonsillectomy: Effect on post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage and perioperative analgesia.
Dahl, JP; Gettelfinger, JD; Matt, BH; Pflum, ZE; Rabbani, CC; Sadhasivam, S; Ye, MJ, 2020
)
2.35
"Ketorolac did not increase postoperative hemorrhage rates in patients posttonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy or UPPP."( Ketorolac usage in tonsillectomy and uvulopalatopharyngoplasty patients.
McClain, K; Williams, AM; Yaremchuk, K, 2020
)
3.44
"Ketorolac BI can increase the success rate of anesthesia after IANB and BI with articaine in patients with AIP."( Efficacy of Ketorolac Buccal Infiltrations and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocks in Patients with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial.
Abbott, PV; Akhlaghi, NM; Hormozi, B; Khalilak, Z, 2016
)
2.26
"Ketorolac does not increase the incidence of developing a pseudoarthrosis when used as an adjunct for postoperative analgesia following a PSFI for AIS using segmental spinal instrumentation and iliac crest bone graft. "( Postoperative ketorolac does not predispose to pseudoarthrosis following posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Agrawal, S; Elerson, E; Lovejoy, JF; McClung, A; Nelson, T; Sucato, DJ, 2008
)
2.15
"Ketorolac, which may cause renal vasoconstriction by cyclooxygenase inhibition, is often administered to patients anesthetized with sevoflurane that is metabolized to inorganic fluoride (F(-)), another potential nephrotoxin. "( Ketorolac is not nephrotoxic in connection with sevoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing breast surgery.
Eriksson, H; Koivusalo, AM; Laisalmi, M; Lindgren, L; Pere, P; Rosenberg, P, 2001
)
3.2

Treatment

R-ketorolac treatment inhibited tumor Rac1 and Cdc42 activity with little impact on mRNA or protein expression of these GTPase targets. The patients had significantly less pain at both the 2- and 5-hour intervals after surgery compared with the acetaminophen or ibuprofen groups.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Ketorolac treatment did not affect basal prostanoid levels but completely prevented prostanoid induction upon global ischemia."( Blood-Brain Barrier Is the Major Site for a Rapid and Dramatic Prostanoid Increase upon Brain Global Ischemia.
Golovko, MY; Golovko, SA; Seeger, DR, 2020
)
1.28
"R-ketorolac treatment inhibited tumor Rac1 and Cdc42 activity with little impact on mRNA or protein expression of these GTPase targets."( The R-enantiomer of ketorolac reduces ovarian cancer tumor burden in vivo.
Brayer, KJ; Dominguez, DR; Grimes, MM; Guo, Y; Hudson, LG; Kenney, SR; Wandinger-Ness, A, 2021
)
1.5
"Ketorolac-treated patients were younger, had better preoperative renal function, and underwent less complex operations compared with non-ketorolac patients. "( Black box warning: is ketorolac safe for use after cardiac surgery?
Jerzewski, K; Kulik, A; Oliveri, L, 2014
)
2.16
"Ketorolac treatments were administered either 1 week before optic nerve crush (pre-ONC) or right after the ONC (simultaneous)."( Ketorolac Administration Attenuates Retinal Ganglion Cell Death After Axonal Injury.
Agudo-Barriuso, M; Bravo-Osuna, I; Herrero-Vanrell, R; Molina-Martínez, I; Nadal-Nicolás, FM; Rodriguez-Villagra, E; Sobrado-Calvo, P; Vidal-Sanz, M; Villegas-Pérez, MP, 2016
)
2.6
"The ketorolac-treated patients had significantly less pain at both the 2- and 5-hour intervals after surgery compared with either the acetaminophen or ibuprofen groups (P = 0.001). "( Ketorolac versus acetaminophen or ibuprofen in controlling postoperative pain in patients with strabismus.
Morrison, NA; Repka, MX, 1994
)
2.29
"Ketorolac-treated patients had consistently (but not significantly) shorter recovery times to oral intake, ambulation, and discharge than those in the dezocine or fentanyl groups."( Use of analgesics during propofol sedation: a comparison of ketorolac, dezocine, and fentanyl.
Ramirez-Ruiz, M; Smith, I; White, PF, 1995
)
1.25
"Five ketorolac-treated patients had bleeding which led to unscheduled admission to hospital, P < 0.05, Exact Test."( Preoperative ketorolac increases bleeding after tonsillectomy in children.
MacNeill, HB; Reid, CW; Rhine, EJ; Roberts, DW; Splinter, WM, 1996
)
1.12
"Ketorolac-treated patients had significantly better pain control at 2, 6, and 24 h."( The addition of continuous intravenous infusion of ketorolac to a patient-controlled analgetic morphine regime reduced postoperative myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing elective total hip or knee arthroplasty.
Badner, NH; Beattie, WS; Buckley, N; Chan, V; Etches, R; Girard, M; Parsons, D; Warriner, CB, 1997
)
1.27
"Ketorolac treated eyes showed 50.7% reduction in main symptoms of itching compared to 33.3% relief in placebo treated eyes after 2 weeks of treatment (p < 0.01)."( Topical ketorolac 0.5% solution for the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis.
Gupta, A; Gupta, R; Ram, J; Sharma, A, 1997
)
1.45
"Ketorolac treatment was significantly better than placebo at 0.5 and 1 hour by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Pain Rating Index, and better than meperidine at 2 hours (by the VAS)."( Controlled trial of ketorolac in tension-type headache.
Fink, K; Gracely, RH; Harden, RN; Rogers, D, 1998
)
1.34
"Post-treatment with ketorolac was more effective in attenuating PACAP38-induced headache compared to sumatriptan. "( Investigation of sumatriptan and ketorolac trometamol in the human experimental model of headache.
Al-Karagholi, MA; Amin, FM; Arngrim, N; Ashina, M; Ghanizada, H; Larsson, HBW; Metcalf-Clausen, M; Mørch-Rasmussen, M, 2020
)
1.16
"Eyes treated with ketorolac and diclofenac demonstrated reduced aqueous leucocyte concentrations of 62% and 64% respectively, compared with untreated controls (p<0.05). "( Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of intravitreal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for intraocular inflammation.
Barañano, DE; Durairaj, C; Edelhauser, HF; Handa, JT; Kim, SJ; Kompella, UB, 2009
)
0.69
"Treatment with ketorolac after abdominal myomectomy results in a statistically significant reduction in the rate of febrile episodes."( The effect of ketorolac on postoperative febrile episodes in patients after abdominal myomectomy.
Ascher-Walsh, C; Blanco, J; Held, BI; Michels, A, 2002
)
1.03
"Treatment with ketorolac prevented all of these morbidities."( Ketorolac attenuates cardiopulmonary derangements in sheep with combined burn and smoke inhalation injury.
Cox, R; Enkhbaatar, P; Hawkins, H; Herndon, D; Murakami, K; Salsbury, J; Shimoda, K; Traber, D; Traber, L, 2003
)
2.1
"Treatment with ketorolac is completed during hospitalization; therefore, compliance is ensured."( Ketorolac prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification after hip replacement.
Pritchett, JW, 1995
)
2.07
"Pretreatment with ketorolac almost completely abrogated the endotoxin-induced increase in hepatic amino acid transport."( Cyclo-oxygenase blockade abrogates the endotoxin-induced increase in Na(+)-dependent hepatic amino acid transport.
Bode, BP; Pacitti, AJ; Plumley, DA; Souba, WW; Watkins, K,
)
0.45
"Pretreatment with ketorolac had a selective effect on the postburn injury hyperalgesia, reducing the increase in pain intensity (P<0.05) but not the decline in pain threshold. "( Reduction of postburn hyperalgesia after local injection of ketorolac in healthy volunteers.
Brull, SJ; Collins, JG; Kitahata, LM; LaMotte, R; Lundell, JC; O'Connor, TZ; Silverman, DG, 1996
)
0.87

Toxicity

Ketorolac is as safe as ketoprofen and diclofenac for the treatment of pain after major surgery. No adverse events were noted in any of the ket orolac-stent groups.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Ketorolac proved safe for short-term intravenous use in children more than 1 year of age when patients with known contraindications to the use of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs were excluded."( Safety of intravenous ketorolac therapy in children and cost savings with a unit dosing system.
Berde, CB; Houck, CS; McDermott, JS; Sethna, NF; Wilder, RT, 1996
)
2.05
" In general, the adverse events associated with ketorolac are similar to other NSAIDs."( Side effects of NSAIDs and dosing recommendations for ketorolac.
Camu, F; Lauwers, MH; Vanlersberghe, C, 1996
)
0.8
"Gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation, platelet inhibition with altered haemostasis, and renal impairment are among the list of adverse effects associated with the administration of ketorolac."( Minimising the adverse effects of ketorolac.
Reinhart, DI, 2000
)
0.78
"Ketorolac is approved for the relief of postoperative pain but concerns have been raised over a possible risk of serious adverse effects and death."( Ketorolac, diclofenac, and ketoprofen are equally safe for pain relief after major surgery.
Abdalla, M; Bianchi, PG; Bonnet, F; Camu, F; Ebrahim, S; Escolar, G; Forrest, JB; Greer, IA; Heitlinger, E; Jage, J; Kehlet, H; Langman, MJ; Pocock, S; Samama, MM; Velo, G, 2002
)
3.2
"38%) had a serious adverse outcome, with 19 deaths (0."( Ketorolac, diclofenac, and ketoprofen are equally safe for pain relief after major surgery.
Abdalla, M; Bianchi, PG; Bonnet, F; Camu, F; Ebrahim, S; Escolar, G; Forrest, JB; Greer, IA; Heitlinger, E; Jage, J; Kehlet, H; Langman, MJ; Pocock, S; Samama, MM; Velo, G, 2002
)
1.76
"We conclude that ketorolac is as safe as ketoprofen and diclofenac for the treatment of pain after major surgery."( Ketorolac, diclofenac, and ketoprofen are equally safe for pain relief after major surgery.
Abdalla, M; Bianchi, PG; Bonnet, F; Camu, F; Ebrahim, S; Escolar, G; Forrest, JB; Greer, IA; Heitlinger, E; Jage, J; Kehlet, H; Langman, MJ; Pocock, S; Samama, MM; Velo, G, 2002
)
2.1
" We suggest that intravenous ketorolac combined with midazolam is a safe and effective anesthetic regiment for ESWL, particularly on ambulatory basis."( Effects of intravenous ketorolac and fentanyl combined with midazolam on analgesia and side effects during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Cherng, CH; Ho, ST; Wong, CS; Yang, CP, 2002
)
0.92
" These data suggest that intrathecal ketorolac does not produce a high incidence of serious adverse events, and they support further investigation for analgesia."( Phase I safety assessment of intrathecal ketorolac.
Curry, R; Eisenach, JC; Hood, DD; Yaksh, TL, 2002
)
0.85
"VAT is as safe as conventional thyroidectomy and is characterized by a less painful postoperative course and by better cosmetic results and postoperative outcome."( Safety of video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional surgery.
Bellantone, R; Fadda, G; Lombardi, CP; Lulli, P; Princi, P; Raffaelli, M; Rossi, ED, 2005
)
0.33
"5 million adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports for 8620 drugs/biologics that are listed for 1191 Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction (COSTAR) terms of adverse effects."( Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
Benz, RD; Contrera, JF; Kruhlak, NL; Matthews, EJ; Weaver, JL, 2004
)
0.32
" Ketorolac was not associated with any adverse hematologic or renal effects."( Safety of ketorolac in neonates and infants after cardiac surgery.
Carberry, KE; Moffett, BS; Mott, AR; Wann, TI, 2006
)
1.65
" Other adverse events were reported with similar frequency in all treatment groups and most were considered unrelated to treatment."( The safety and analgesic efficacy of intranasal ketorolac in patients with postoperative pain.
Bisley, EJ; Brown, CR; Bynum, L; Moodie, JE; Weber, HU, 2008
)
0.6
"Intravenous ketorolac appears to be safe when used in infants less than six months of age with biventricular circulations following cardiothoracic surgery."( Safety of intravenous use of ketorolac in infants following cardiothoracic surgery.
Barclay, CA; Dawkins, TN; Gardiner, RL; Krawczeski, CD, 2009
)
1.02
" No adverse events were noted in any of the ketorolac-stent groups."( An in vivo porcine evaluation of the safety, bioavailability, and tissue penetration of a ketorolac drug-eluting ureteral stent designed to improve comfort.
Chew, BH; Davoudi, H; Denstedt, JD; Li, J, 2010
)
0.84
"The use of ketorolac-eluting ureteral stents has proven to be safe in a porcine model."( An in vivo porcine evaluation of the safety, bioavailability, and tissue penetration of a ketorolac drug-eluting ureteral stent designed to improve comfort.
Chew, BH; Davoudi, H; Denstedt, JD; Li, J, 2010
)
0.97
" However, this group of drugs is associated with serious adverse drug reactions."( Differential involvement of mitochondrial dysfunction, cytochrome P450 activity, and active transport in the toxicity of structurally related NSAIDs.
Unlü, B; van Leeuwen, JS; Vermeulen, NP; Vos, JC, 2012
)
0.38
"In this study, IVKT was a safe analgesic in the setting of primary ESS."( The safety and efficacy of intravenous ketorolac in patients undergoing primary endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial.
Fargo, K; Moeller, C; Pappas, AL; Pawlowski, J; Welch, K,
)
0.4
" The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar across groups."( Analgesic efficacy and safety of a novel injectable formulation of diclofenac compared with intravenous ketorolac and placebo after orthopedic surgery: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, multiple-dose trial.
Carr, DB; Daniels, S; Hamilton, DA; Lang, E; Melson, T, 2013
)
0.6
"HPβCD diclofenac is safe and efficacious for acute moderate and severe pain after orthopedic surgery and significantly spares morphine use."( Analgesic efficacy and safety of a novel injectable formulation of diclofenac compared with intravenous ketorolac and placebo after orthopedic surgery: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, multiple-dose trial.
Carr, DB; Daniels, S; Hamilton, DA; Lang, E; Melson, T, 2013
)
0.6
" Results of HET-CAM and ICE tests suggest that sulphacetamide is moderately toxic in the presence of light/UV-A and very slightly irritant without irradiation."( Photochemical toxicity of drugs intended for ocular use.
Kaithwas, G; Kishor, K; Sahu, RK; Saraf, SA; Singh, B, 2014
)
0.4
"The objective was to determine whether sex and age are associated with short-term headache relief, sustained headache freedom, or adverse medication effects in data collected during 3 emergency department (ED)-based acute migraine comparative efficacy trials."( Age But Not Sex Is Associated With Efficacy and Adverse Events Following Administration of Intravenous Migraine Medication: An Analysis of a Clinical Trial Database.
Bijur, PE; Cisewski, DH; Friedman, BW; Gallagher, EJ; Holden, L,
)
0.13
" In each of these studies, (1) short-term efficacy (patient description of the headache as "mild" or "none" 1 hour after medication administration); (2) sustained efficacy (patient description of the headache as "none" within 2 hours of medication administration and no headache recurrence for 24 hours post ED discharge); and (3) the frequency of any adverse medication effects within 24 hours of medication administration was determined."( Age But Not Sex Is Associated With Efficacy and Adverse Events Following Administration of Intravenous Migraine Medication: An Analysis of a Clinical Trial Database.
Bijur, PE; Cisewski, DH; Friedman, BW; Gallagher, EJ; Holden, L,
)
0.13
" Age was associated with both efficacy and adverse events."( Age But Not Sex Is Associated With Efficacy and Adverse Events Following Administration of Intravenous Migraine Medication: An Analysis of a Clinical Trial Database.
Bijur, PE; Cisewski, DH; Friedman, BW; Gallagher, EJ; Holden, L,
)
0.13
"In this retrospective analysis of 10,575 patients who used fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) after surgery, we evaluated difference between young and elderly patients on their characteristic of adverse effects."( Postoperative Pain and Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia-Related Adverse Effects in Young and Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of 10,575 Patients.
Choi, S; Han, DW; Kim, SY; Koh, JC; Lee, J, 2015
)
0.42
"Many adverse drug reactions are caused by the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-dependent activation of drugs into reactive metabolites."( Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
Jones, LH; Nadanaciva, S; Rana, P; Will, Y, 2016
)
0.43
"Based on the most up-to-date literature, ketorolac in normal doses has been demonstrated to be safe with respect to bone healing."( Safety Considerations in the Use of Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain.
Kodumudi, G; Lipana, L; Maslin, B; Roth, B; Vadivelu, N, 2017
)
1
"Perioperative administration of ketorolac has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in healthy patients and is particularly beneficial as an opioid-sparing agent in vulnerable patient groups."( Safety Considerations in the Use of Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain.
Kodumudi, G; Lipana, L; Maslin, B; Roth, B; Vadivelu, N, 2017
)
1.01
" In the same patient cohort the maximal total plasma concentration of ropivacaine was below the established toxic threshold for most patients."( Local infiltration analgesia in knee and hip arthroplasty efficacy and safety.
Affas, F, 2016
)
0.43
" The plasma concentration of ropivacaine seems to be below toxic levels in most TKA patients."( Local infiltration analgesia in knee and hip arthroplasty efficacy and safety.
Affas, F, 2016
)
0.43
" We found that gastrointestinal side effects were mainly reported with prolonged use, significant bleeding was reported in adenotonsillectomy, and adverse renal effects appeared to be limited to patients with specific coexisting risk factors."( Narrative review shows that the short-term use of ketorolac is safe and effective in the management of moderate-to-severe pain in children.
Amoroso, S; Barbi, E; Calligaris, L; Marzuillo, P, 2018
)
0.73
"The short-term use of ketorolac appears to be safe for children in many situations."( Narrative review shows that the short-term use of ketorolac is safe and effective in the management of moderate-to-severe pain in children.
Amoroso, S; Barbi, E; Calligaris, L; Marzuillo, P, 2018
)
1.05
" The primary outcome was the occurrence of any of the following adverse events within 30 days of the ED visit: gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, acute decompensated heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, dialysis, transfusion, and death."( Safety of parenteral ketorolac use for analgesia in geriatric emergency department patients.
Anderson, GL; Bellolio, MF; Brown, CS; Cabrera, D; Mara, KC; Mattson, AE, 2020
)
0.88
"The use of single doses of parenteral ketorolac for analgesia management was not associated with an increased incidence of adverse cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, or renal adverse outcomes in a select group of older adults."( Safety of parenteral ketorolac use for analgesia in geriatric emergency department patients.
Anderson, GL; Bellolio, MF; Brown, CS; Cabrera, D; Mara, KC; Mattson, AE, 2020
)
1.15
"3% was safe for use in children and maintained mydriasis during cataract surgery."( Safety and efficacy data supporting U.S. FDA approval of intracameral phenylephrine and ketorolac 1.0%/0.3% for pediatric cataract surgery: clinical safety and pupil and pain management.
Plager, DA; Trivedi, RH; Wilson, ME, 2020
)
0.78
" Adverse drug reactions may be renal, gastrointestinal, hematological, or immunologic."( Efficacy and Safety of NSAIDs in Infants: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature of the Past 20 Years.
Gorenflo, M; Saur, P; van den Anker, JN; van Dyk, M; Welzel, T; Ziesenitz, VC, 2022
)
0.72
" The profile of adverse reactions was assessed by the dynamics of red blood counts, as a possible trigger for the development of gastrointestinal bleeding according to the method of global assessment of triggers (Global Trigger Tool GTT)."( [Evaluation of the association of polymorphisms of the CYP2C8 gene with the efficacy and safety of ketorolac in patients with postoperative pain syndrome].
Abdullaev, SP; Blagovestnov, DA; Denisenko, NP; Epifanova, IP; Grishina, EA; Kachanova, AA; Muradian, AA; Petrov, DI; Skukin, DS; Sozaeva, ZA; Sychev, DA, 2022
)
0.94
" Carriage of the genotype CYP2C8*3 (rs10509681) and CYP2C8*3 (rs10509681) does not affect the risk of developing adverse reactions after ketorolac anesthesia."( [Evaluation of the association of polymorphisms of the CYP2C8 gene with the efficacy and safety of ketorolac in patients with postoperative pain syndrome].
Abdullaev, SP; Blagovestnov, DA; Denisenko, NP; Epifanova, IP; Grishina, EA; Kachanova, AA; Muradian, AA; Petrov, DI; Skukin, DS; Sozaeva, ZA; Sychev, DA, 2022
)
1.14
"The prepared CS/Pl hydrogels demonstrated stimuli-controlled release with delivery of drug for prolonged period of time and thus can minimize dosing frequency, safe drug delivery, increased patient compliance and easiness."( Fabrication of pH responsive hydrogel blends of chondroitin sulfate/pluronic F-127 for the controlled release of ketorolac: its characterization and acute oral toxicity study.
Abdullah, Z; Afzal, S; Anjum, I; Badshah, SF; Barkat, K; Khalid, I; Khan, DH; Mehmood, Y; Naeem, S; Shabbir, M; Shamshad, N; Syed, MA, 2022
)
0.93

Pharmacokinetics

The aim of this study was to review age- and weight-related effects on ketorolac pharmacokinetic parameters in children and current dosing schedules. The peak concentration of each drug in the retina/choroid was 201 microg/g for ket orolac and 4.5 microg for pentyl ester.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Ketorolac did not alter the pharmacodynamic profile of racemic warfarin."( Investigations into the potential effects of multiple dose ketorolac on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of racemic warfarin.
Aarons, L; Bullingham, R; Holt, BL; Mullins, FG; Rowland, M; Toon, S, 1990
)
1.43
" The rate of absorption of K and formation of PHK, as determined by Cmax and Tmax values, was significantly slower following the im doses."( Pharmacokinetics of ketorolac and p-hydroxyketorolac following oral and intramuscular administration of ketorolac tromethamine.
Bynum, L; Jung, D; Ling, TL; Mroszczak, EJ; Sevelius, H; Wu, A, 1989
)
0.6
" Pharmacokinetic data was available for 85 subjects."( Population pharmacodynamic model for ketorolac analgesia.
Mandema, JW; Stanski, DR, 1996
)
0.57
"The pharmacokinetic data was best described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption."( Population pharmacodynamic model for ketorolac analgesia.
Mandema, JW; Stanski, DR, 1996
)
0.57
" Pharmacokinetic values were estimated by a nonlinear computer program."( Pharmacokinetics of ketorolac in children after abdominal surgery.
González-Martin, G; González-Sotomayor, J; Maggio, L; Zuniga, S, 1997
)
0.62
"5 mg/kg), and racemic KT (5 mg/kg) were administered orally to male Sprague-Dawley rats and plasma samples were collected for 6 h post-dose for pharmacokinetic assessments."( Stereospecific pharmacokinetics and toxicodynamics of ketorolac after oral administration of the racemate and optically pure enantiomers to the rat.
Aberg, G; Corrigan, BW; Davies, NM; Jamali, F; Lovlin, R, 1999
)
0.55
" Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters for racemic drug and both enantiomers were determined for each patient."( Enantiomer-selective pharmacokinetics and metabolism of ketorolac in children.
Aravind, MK; Kauffman, RE; Lieh-Lai, MW; Uy, HG, 1999
)
0.55
" Terminal half-life of S(-)-ketorolac was 40% that of the R(+) enantiomer, and the apparent volume of distribution of the S(-) enantiomer was greater than that of the R(+) form."( Enantiomer-selective pharmacokinetics and metabolism of ketorolac in children.
Aravind, MK; Kauffman, RE; Lieh-Lai, MW; Uy, HG, 1999
)
0.84
" Because of the greater clearance and shorter half-life of S(-)-ketorolac, pharmacokinetic predictions based on racemic assays may overestimate the duration of pharmacologic effect."( Enantiomer-selective pharmacokinetics and metabolism of ketorolac in children.
Aravind, MK; Kauffman, RE; Lieh-Lai, MW; Uy, HG, 1999
)
0.79
", its pharmacokinetic (PK) properties] and how these PK properties differ between individuals in a population (i."( An evaluation of population D-optimal designs via pharmacokinetic simulations.
Dodds, MG; Foracchia, M; Hooker, AC; Vicini, P, 2003
)
0.32
" Determination of ketorolac in plasma was carried out by HPLC and estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters was performed by non-compartmental analysis."( Ketorolac pharmacokinetics in experimental cirrhosis by bile duct ligation in the rat.
Castañeda-Hernández, G; Muriel, P; Ordaz Gallo, M; Palma-Aguirre, A; Pérez-Urizar, J; Rivera-Espinosa, L,
)
1.91
"Human pharmacokinetic parameters are often predicted prior to clinical study from in vivo preclinical pharmacokinetic data."( Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
Jolivette, LJ; Ward, KW, 2005
)
0.33
" Pharmacokinetic profiles of intravenous ketorolac and its pentyl ester on an equal-molar basis in six rabbits were evaluated."( Pharmacokinetics of ketorolac pentyl ester, a novel ester derivative of ketorolac, in rabbits.
Cheng, KI; Chu, CC; Chu, KS; Shieh, JP; Su, WL; Tzeng, JI; Wang, JJ, 2005
)
0.92
" The prodrug nepafenac had the shortest time to peak concentration and the greatest peak aqueous humor concentration (C(max))."( In vivo pharmacokinetics and in vitro pharmacodynamics of nepafenac, amfenac, ketorolac, and bromfenac.
Ernest, P; Gayton, J; Lehmann, R; Raizman, M; Walters, T, 2007
)
0.57
" Pharmacokinetic parameters for both the stereoisomers were estimated by model-independent methods."( Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of ketorolac in calves after a single intravenous and oral dose.
Deshmukh, DD; Duran, SH; Nagilla, R; Ravis, WR, 2007
)
0.61
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
" Finally, this procedure was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study."( Two-dimensional liquid chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry for the simultaneous determination of ketorolac enantiomers and paracetamol in human plasma: application to a pharmacokinetic study.
Besson, M; Daali, Y; Dayer, P; Desmeules, JA; Ing-Lorenzini, KR; Veuthey, JL, 2009
)
0.57
" The objective of this analysis was to construct a population pharmacokinetic model to describe ketorolac disposition in young children."( Population pharmacokinetics of ketorolac in neonates and young infants.
Cohen, D; Davis, L; Mondick, JT; Zuppa, AF,
)
0.64
" In a single dose study, its pharmacokinetic profile was compared with that of ketorolac."( Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
Abignente, E; Boatto, G; Calignano, A; Curcio, A; Gavini, E; La Rana, G; Melisi, D; Nieddu, M; Rimoli, MG; Russo, R; Sasso, O, 2009
)
0.9
"Population pharmacodynamic experiments sometime involve repeated measurements of ordinal random variables at specific time points."( Sample size/power calculations for repeated ordinal measurements in population pharmacodynamic experiments.
Aarons, L; Ogungbenro, K, 2010
)
0.36
" Despite the efficacy of ketorolac in young patients, there are minimal data to characterize the pharmacokinetic variables of ketorolac in infants younger than 6 months."( Pharmacokinetics of single-dose intravenous ketorolac in infants aged 2-11 months.
Christians, U; Cohen, MN; Galinkin, J; Henthorn, T; Moll, V; Vu Tran, Z; Zuk, J, 2011
)
0.93
" Pharmacokinetic analysis of individual subjects and population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using SAAM II and PopKinetics, respectively (SAAM Institute, University of Washington)."( Pharmacokinetics of single-dose intravenous ketorolac in infants aged 2-11 months.
Christians, U; Cohen, MN; Galinkin, J; Henthorn, T; Moll, V; Vu Tran, Z; Zuk, J, 2011
)
0.63
"Characterization of pharmacokinetic parameters was possible in 14 subjects."( Pharmacokinetics of single-dose intravenous ketorolac in infants aged 2-11 months.
Christians, U; Cohen, MN; Galinkin, J; Henthorn, T; Moll, V; Vu Tran, Z; Zuk, J, 2011
)
0.63
"This is the first report of individualized pharmacokinetic parameters of ketorolac in children in which the majority of subjects were younger than 6 months old."( Pharmacokinetics of single-dose intravenous ketorolac in infants aged 2-11 months.
Christians, U; Cohen, MN; Galinkin, J; Henthorn, T; Moll, V; Vu Tran, Z; Zuk, J, 2011
)
0.86
" The relationship between the main pharmacokinetic parameters [viz."( Intravenous prediction of human pharmacokinetic parameters for ketorolac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent, using allometry approach.
Gilibili, RR; Mullangi, R; Srinivas, NR, 2011
)
0.61
" Further, the method was also successfully applied to a single-dose pharmacokinetic study in rats."( Development and validation of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric method for simultaneous determination of moxifloxacin and ketorolac in rat plasma: application to pharmacokinetic study.
Banerjee, SK; Borkar, RM; Padiya, R; Raju, B; Ramesh, M; Srinivas, R, 2012
)
0.58
" The development of NSAIDs having safer therapeutic profile depends on the better understanding of their mechanisms, physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties."( Self-organizing molecular field analysis of NSAIDs: assessment of pharmacokinetic and physicochemical properties using 3D-QSPkR approach.
Kumar, M; Sinha, VR; Thareja, S, 2012
)
0.38
" This suggests that postpartum is another specific status in young women that merits focused, compound-specific pharmacokinetic evaluation."( The impact of Caesarean delivery on paracetamol and ketorolac pharmacokinetics: a paired analysis.
Allegaert, K; de Hoon, J; Devlieger, R; Kulo, A; Smits, A; van Calsteren, K; Verbesselt, R, 2012
)
0.63
" The clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetic profile of intravenous (IV) ketorolac tromethamine (0."( Pharmacokinetics and perioperative efficacy of intravenous ketorolac in dogs.
Beccaglia, M; Cagnardi, P; Carli, S; Fonda, D; Gallo, M; Ravasio, G; Villa, R; Zonca, A, 2013
)
0.87
" After F3 administration to rats, the Cmax (2."( Pharmacokinetics and analgesic effect of ketorolac floating delivery system.
Abou El Ela, Ael S; El-Maraghy, DA; Hassan, MA; Radwan, MA, 2015
)
0.68
"The objective of this study was to determine the impact of a pharmacy-managed pharmacokinetic dosing program on appropriate dosing of famotidine, enoxaparin, and ketorolac."( Evaluation of a Pharmacy-Managed Pharmacokinetic Dosing Program.
Crannage, AJ; Korobey, MJ; Meyenburg, LK; Murphy, JA, 2015
)
0.61
"A large community teaching hospital implemented a pharmacy-managed pharmacokinetic dosing program for famotidine, enoxaparin, and ketorolac."( Evaluation of a Pharmacy-Managed Pharmacokinetic Dosing Program.
Crannage, AJ; Korobey, MJ; Meyenburg, LK; Murphy, JA, 2015
)
0.62
"Implementation of a pharmacy-managed pharmacokinetic dosing program significantly improved appropriate dosing of famotidine, enoxaparin, and ketorolac."( Evaluation of a Pharmacy-Managed Pharmacokinetic Dosing Program.
Crannage, AJ; Korobey, MJ; Meyenburg, LK; Murphy, JA, 2015
)
0.62
" Concentrations of ketorolac in serum were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography to establish pharmacokinetic parameters."( Pharmacokinetics of intravenous ketorolac in cats undergoing gonadectomy.
Borghi, L; Cagnardi, P; Carli, S; Ferraresi, C; Ravasio, G; Villa, R; Zonca, A, 2015
)
1.03
"To describe the effect of age and body size on enantiomer selective pharmacokinetic (PK) of intravenous ketorolac in children using a microanalytical assay."( The enantioselective population pharmacokinetics of intravenous ketorolac in children using a stereoselective assay suitable for microanalysis.
Cameron, GA; Engelhardt, T; Hawwa, AF; McLay, JS; Mohammed, BS, 2015
)
0.87
" Finally, the simultaneous increase in CL and Vss resulted in similar estimates for elimination half-life in both unpaired and paired analysis."( Enantiomer-specific ketorolac pharmacokinetics in young women, including pregnancy and postpartum period.
Allegaert, K; De Hoon, J; Deprest, J; Kulo, A; Maleškić, S; Smits, A; Van Calsteren, K; Van de Velde, M; Verbesselt, R, 2017
)
0.78
"The aim of this study was to review age- and weight-related effects on ketorolac pharmacokinetic parameters in children and current dosing schedules."( The pharmacokinetics of intravenous ketorolac in children aged 2 months to 16 years: A population analysis.
Anderson, BJ; Avram, MJ; Cameron, G; Christians, U; Cohen, MN; Dsida, RM; Engelhardt, T; Galinkin, JL; Hawwa, AF; Henthorn, TK; McLay, JS; Mohammed, BS, 2018
)
0.99
" However, its safety, local tolerance, and potential for pharmacokinetic interaction have not been assessed."( Pharmacokinetics and four-week repeated-dose toxicity of hyaluronic acid and ketorolac combination following intra-articular administration in normal rats.
Ho, MJ; Kang, MJ; Kim, HT; Kim, JH; Kim, JM; Kim, SH; Park, KW; Song, SH, 2019
)
0.74
" The objective of this study is to investigate the pharmacokinetic properties of S (-) and R (+) enantiomers of ketorolac in adult patients undergoing total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA)."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Periarticular Ketorolac in Adult Patients Undergoing Total Hip or Total Knee Replacement Surgery.
Bijoor, M; Gurunathan, U; Maguire, R; Parker, SL; Ramdath, D; Roberts, JA; Wallis, SC, 2019
)
0.98

Compound-Compound Interactions

Preoperative gabapentin, dexamethasone and ketamine combined with paracetamol and ketorolac reduced overall pain scores in patients after hip arthroplasty.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"To examine the efficacy of intramuscular (IM) ketorolac used in combination with intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine for postoperative pain relief following intra-abdominal gynecologic surgery."( The efficacy of intramuscular ketorolac in combination with intravenous PCA morphine for postoperative pain relief.
Brull, SJ; Ning, T; Paige, D; Sevarino, FB; Silverman, DG; Sinatra, RS,
)
0.68
"Propacetamol and ketorolac, combined with patient-controlled analgesia morphine, show similar analgesic efficacy after gynecologic surgery."( A double-blinded evaluation of propacetamol versus ketorolac in combination with patient-controlled analgesia morphine: analgesic efficacy and tolerability after gynecologic surgery.
Agrò, F; Aloe, L; Ballabio, M; De Cillis, P; De Nicola, A; Giunta, F; Ischia, S; Marinangeli, F; Stefanini, S; Varrassi, G, 1999
)
0.89
" This study was to compare the analgesic and side effects of intravenous ketorolac with that of intravenous fentanyl, in combination with midazolam in ESWL."( Effects of intravenous ketorolac and fentanyl combined with midazolam on analgesia and side effects during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Cherng, CH; Ho, ST; Wong, CS; Yang, CP, 2002
)
0.86
"Both intravenous ketorolac and fentanyl in combination with midazolam could provide good anesthesia for ESWL."( Effects of intravenous ketorolac and fentanyl combined with midazolam on analgesia and side effects during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Cherng, CH; Ho, ST; Wong, CS; Yang, CP, 2002
)
0.96
"Only a relatively short immediate analgesic benefit could be demonstrated by a combination of IINB with spinal anaesthesia compared with IINB combined with general anaesthesia."( Analgesia and discharge following preincisional ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block combined with general or spinal anaesthesia for inguinal herniorrhaphy.
Permi, J; Rosenberg, PH; Toivonen, J, 2004
)
0.32
" We, therefore, investigated the analgesic effect of gabapentin, dexamethasone and low-dose ketamine in combination with paracetamol and ketorolac as compared with paracetamol and ketorolac alone after hip arthroplasty."( Multimodal analgesia with gabapentin, ketamine and dexamethasone in combination with paracetamol and ketorolac after hip arthroplasty: a preliminary study.
Christensen, BV; Dahl, JB; Dierking, G; Hilsted, KL; Larsen, TK; Mathiesen, O; Rasmussen, ML, 2010
)
0.78
"Preoperative gabapentin, dexamethasone and ketamine combined with paracetamol and ketorolac reduced overall pain scores in patients after hip arthroplasty as compared with paracetamol and ketorolac alone."( Multimodal analgesia with gabapentin, ketamine and dexamethasone in combination with paracetamol and ketorolac after hip arthroplasty: a preliminary study.
Christensen, BV; Dahl, JB; Dierking, G; Hilsted, KL; Larsen, TK; Mathiesen, O; Rasmussen, ML, 2010
)
0.8
"we compared the clinical efficacy and safety between a new injectable cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitor, parecoxib, and an old nonselective, ketorolac combined with morphine in patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for management of post-cesarean delivery pain."( Comparison of the efficacy of parecoxib versus ketorolac combined with morphine on patient-controlled analgesia for post-cesarean delivery pain management.
Cheu, NW; Chuang, FH; Liao, CH; Tan, TD; Wang, YR; Watts, MP; Wong, JO, 2010
)
0.82
" Morphine was basically used in PCA manner during the 3-day study course; and in Group K patients received an intravenous loading bolus of 30mg ketorolac post-operatively and then 90mg ketorolac combined with morphine in PCA fashion throughout the study course."( Comparison of the efficacy of parecoxib versus ketorolac combined with morphine on patient-controlled analgesia for post-cesarean delivery pain management.
Cheu, NW; Chuang, FH; Liao, CH; Tan, TD; Wang, YR; Watts, MP; Wong, JO, 2010
)
0.82
" We performed a two-center, prospective, randomized, blinded trial comparing three doses of intrathecal morphine, combined with routine intravenous ketorolac, in 144 healthy women undergoing elective cesarean delivery."( Dose-response of intrathecal morphine when administered with intravenous ketorolac for post-cesarean analgesia: a two-center, prospective, randomized, blinded trial.
Alshaeri, T; Amdur, RL; Berger, JS; Gonzalez, A; Hopkins, A; Jeon, D; Smiley, R; Wang, S, 2016
)
0.87
"To determine which non-narcotic analgesic, acetaminophen (Ofirmev®) or ketorolac (Toradol®), provides better post-operative pain control when combined with an opioid patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump."( A prospective randomized trial of intravenous ketorolac vs. acetaminophen administered with opioid patient-controlled analgesia in gynecologic surgery.
Ahmad, S; Bigsby, GE; Ghurani, GB; Holloway, RW; James, JA; Jeppson, CN; Kendrick, JE; Rakowski, JA, 2019
)
1.01
"To investigate the efficacy and safety of whole-course application of dexmedetomidine combined with ketorolac in nonnarcotic postoperative analgesia and its effect on inflammatory response and immune function in thoracoscopic surgery of lung cancer."( Whole-Course Application of Dexmedetomidine Combined with Ketorolac in Nonnarcotic Postoperative Analgesia for Patients with Lung Cancer Undergoing Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial.
Hou, QH; Lin, Y; Lu, XY; Lv, R; Miao, Z; Wang, J; Wen, QP; Wu, P; Zhou, FC, 2020
)
1.02
"Whole-course application of dexmedetomidine combined with ketorolac in nonnarcotic postoperative analgesia provided adequate and safe postoperative analgesia, reduced sufentanil consumption, analgesia-related complications, alleviated inflammatory response, and immunosuppression compared with sufentanil-based analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery."( Whole-Course Application of Dexmedetomidine Combined with Ketorolac in Nonnarcotic Postoperative Analgesia for Patients with Lung Cancer Undergoing Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial.
Hou, QH; Lin, Y; Lu, XY; Lv, R; Miao, Z; Wang, J; Wen, QP; Wu, P; Zhou, FC, 2020
)
1.05
"To observe the effect of Ketorolac tromethamine combined with dezocine prior administration on hemodynamics and postoperative sedation in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair."( Effect of ketorolac tromethamine combined with dezocine prior administration on hemodynamics and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair.
Cai, Z; Fu, B; Kang, Y; Li, Y; Wang, J; Wu, Y, 2022
)
1.43
"100 male patients aged 60 to 80 years old, a line to elective laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, were randomly divided into four groups: control group (Group A) and dezocine group (Group B), ketorolac tromethamine group (Group C), ketorolac tromethamine combined with dezocine group (Group D)."( Effect of ketorolac tromethamine combined with dezocine prior administration on hemodynamics and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair.
Cai, Z; Fu, B; Kang, Y; Li, Y; Wang, J; Wu, Y, 2022
)
1.31

Bioavailability

The systemic bioavailability of ketorolac acid from three transdermal formulations was evaluated in nine healthy subjects in a randomized three-way crossover fashion. Nepafenac showed significantly greater ocular bioavailability and amfenac demonstrated greater potency at COX-2 inhibition than ket or bromfenac.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The rate of absorption of K and formation of PHK, as determined by Cmax and Tmax values, was significantly slower following the im doses."( Pharmacokinetics of ketorolac and p-hydroxyketorolac following oral and intramuscular administration of ketorolac tromethamine.
Bynum, L; Jung, D; Ling, TL; Mroszczak, EJ; Sevelius, H; Wu, A, 1989
)
0.6
" The systemic bioavailability of ketorolac acid from three transdermal formulations was evaluated in nine healthy subjects in a randomized three-way crossover fashion."( Absorption of transdermally delivered ketorolac acid in humans.
Combs, D; Manoukian, E; Roy, SD, 1995
)
0.84
" The single-dose mean pharmacokinetic characteristics and relative bioavailability of the four different 10 mg ketorolac tromethamine tablets were evaluated in 12 healthy volunteers in a randomized study of Latin square design."( In vivo/in vitro correlations for four differently dissolving ketorolac tablets.
Chowhan, Z; Gordon, MS, 1996
)
0.75
"To investigate the bioavailability (extent and rate of absorption) of ketorolac from two cutaneous absorption sources, active electrotransport and passive transdermal, and to examine the enantiomeric selectivity of bioavailability for each source."( Passive versus electrotransport-facilitated transdermal absorption of ketorolac.
Gupta, SK; Park, K; Sheiner, LB; Verotta, D, 1998
)
0.77
"Based on a crossover study in 12 healthy volunteers, the extent and rate of absorption of ketorolac, delivered by a patch, were found by estimating the input rate function of the drug."( Passive versus electrotransport-facilitated transdermal absorption of ketorolac.
Gupta, SK; Park, K; Sheiner, LB; Verotta, D, 1998
)
0.76
" bioavailability (F) = 100."( Pharmacokinetics of ketorolac after intravenous and oral single dose administration in dogs.
Burger, J; Conlon, P; Pasloske, K; Renaud, R, 1999
)
0.63
"The analgesic efficacy and bioavailability of 30 mg intramuscular ketorolac was studied in 24 patients with severe or very severe postoperative pain."( Analgesic efficacy and bioavailability of ketorolac in postoperative pain: a probability analysis.
Castañeda-Hernández, G; Flores-Murrieta, FJ; González, C; Granados-Soto, V; Hong, E; Martínez, JL; Pérez-Urizar, J,
)
0.63
"The quantitative structure-bioavailability relationship of 232 structurally diverse drugs was studied to evaluate the feasibility of constructing a predictive model for the human oral bioavailability of prospective new medicinal agents."( QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
Topliss, JG; Yoshida, F, 2000
)
0.31
" These results suggest that solid dispersions of ketorolac with HPbeta-CyD aid in faster dissolution and better bioavailability of the drug."( Solid dispersion of hydroxypropyl beta-cyclodextrin and ketorolac: enhancement of in-vitro dissolution rates, improvement in anti-inflammatory activity and reduction in ulcerogenicity in rats.
Meshram, RN; Nagarsenker, MS; Ramprakash, G, 2000
)
0.81
" Notwithstanding, oral ketorolac bioavailability was significantly altered in BDL rats."( Ketorolac pharmacokinetics in experimental cirrhosis by bile duct ligation in the rat.
Castañeda-Hernández, G; Muriel, P; Ordaz Gallo, M; Palma-Aguirre, A; Pérez-Urizar, J; Rivera-Espinosa, L,
)
1.88
"Nepafenac showed significantly greater ocular bioavailability and amfenac demonstrated greater potency at COX-2 inhibition than ketorolac or bromfenac."( In vivo pharmacokinetics and in vitro pharmacodynamics of nepafenac, amfenac, ketorolac, and bromfenac.
Ernest, P; Gayton, J; Lehmann, R; Raizman, M; Walters, T, 2007
)
0.77
" The average oral bioavailability was 86."( Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of ketorolac in calves after a single intravenous and oral dose.
Deshmukh, DD; Duran, SH; Nagilla, R; Ravis, WR, 2007
)
0.61
" The average bioavailability was 133 +/- 23% for R-KT and S-KT, respectively."( Enantiomeric disposition of ketorolac in goats following administration of a single intravenous and oral dose.
Bell, EC; Copedge, KJ; Deshmukh, DD; Duran, SH; Martin, B; Miller, S; Nagilla, R; Ravis, WR, 2009
)
0.65
"Oral bioavailability (F) is a product of fraction absorbed (Fa), fraction escaping gut-wall elimination (Fg), and fraction escaping hepatic elimination (Fh)."( Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
Chang, G; El-Kattan, A; Miller, HR; Obach, RS; Rotter, C; Steyn, SJ; Troutman, MD; Varma, MV, 2010
)
0.36
"KT was successfully formulated as floating beads with prolonged in vitro release extended to a better in vivo characteristic with higher bioavailability in rats."( Pharmacokinetics and analgesic effect of ketorolac floating delivery system.
Abou El Ela, Ael S; El-Maraghy, DA; Hassan, MA; Radwan, MA, 2015
)
0.68
" In this study, we formulate a Zolmitriptan (ZT) & ketorolac tromethamine (KT) loaded thermo reversible in-situ mucoadhesive intranasal gel (TMISG) formulation which gels at the nasal mucosal temperature and contains a bioadhesive polymer (Xyloglucan) that lengthens the residence time will enhance the bioavailability of the combinational drugs."( Optimization of combinational intranasal drug delivery system for the management of migraine by using statistical design.
Garg, T; Goyal, AK; Kumar, A; Rath, G; Sarma, GS, 2015
)
0.67
" However, the conditions of simulated microgravity substantially alter the pharmacokinetics of ketorolac, increasing the rate of absorption of the drug and reduce its relative bioavailability and retention time in the blood plasma."( [Influence of simulated microgravity on the threshold of pain sensitivity in humans with single dose of ketorolac].
Baranov, MV; Chernogorov, RV; Kovalev, AS; Perfilov, DF; Repenkova, LG,
)
0.56
"The aim of this study was to investigate ketorolac (KT) systemic absolute bioavailability after sublingual (SL) administration in vivo to conscious rabbits."( Sublingual spray drug delivery of ketorolac-loaded chitosan nanoparticles.
Al-Ghananeem, AM; Alsmadi, M; Baltzley, S; Malkawi, AA, 2018
)
1.03
"05) enhanced systemic absorption with 97% absolute bioavailability as compared to 70% after SL administration of KT solution."( Sublingual spray drug delivery of ketorolac-loaded chitosan nanoparticles.
Al-Ghananeem, AM; Alsmadi, M; Baltzley, S; Malkawi, AA, 2018
)
0.76
" Formulation of KT as chitosan nanoparticles has increased its systemic bioavailability after SL spray administration."( Sublingual spray drug delivery of ketorolac-loaded chitosan nanoparticles.
Al-Ghananeem, AM; Alsmadi, M; Baltzley, S; Malkawi, AA, 2018
)
0.76
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
" Thereby, the increase in the drug bioavailability and efficiency must come from the mucoadhesion optimization of the drug delivery system."( Parametric Drug Release Optimization of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs by Gold Nanoparticles for Topically Applied Ocular Therapy.
Boisselier, E; Loiseau, A; Maranda, C; Poliquin, A; Raiche-Marcoux, G, 2022
)
0.72

Dosage Studied

Ketorolac can be used in specific pediatric patients after cardiac surgery with minimal risk of bleeding or renal dysfunction. The incidence of serious or fatal adverse events reported with ketoro is low.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"To describe the use of parenteral ketorolac in a large population of children, focusing on dosing patterns, efficacy, and safety."( Clinical experience with ketorolac in children.
Buck, ML, 1994
)
0.87
"Indications for treatment, dose, dosing interval, use of a loading dose, length of therapy, efficacy (subjective response and use of concomitant therapy), and adverse effects (bleeding, gastrointestinal ulceration or vomiting, and renal dysfunction)."( Clinical experience with ketorolac in children.
Buck, ML, 1994
)
0.59
" The time to first administration of rescue analgesic, up to 24 h following dosing with the study medication, was recorded."( A comparison of intramuscular ketorolac and pethidine in the alleviation of renal colic.
Arkell, DG; Fletcher, MS; Iacovou, JW; Kaisary, AV; Philip, NH; Sandhu, DP, 1994
)
0.58
"The pressor response to noxious colorectal distention (80 mmHg, 20 s) was evaluated in 29 male Sprague-Dawley rats and dose-response curves were determined for intravenous morphine, ketorolac and the mixture of morphine and ketorolac."( Ketorolac potentiates morphine antinociception during visceral nociception in the rat.
Gebhart, GF; Maves, TJ; Meller, ST; Pechman, PS, 1994
)
1.92
" Finally, since ketorolac is excreted almost entirely by the kidney, either elderly patients or patients with underlying renal insufficiency must have an adjustment of the dosing interval, or this medication should be avoided in such patients altogether."( NSAID nephrotoxicity revisited: acute renal failure due to parenteral ketorolac.
Buller, GK; Perazella, MA, 1993
)
0.87
" The pharmacist's concurrent interventions improved prescribing for correct dosage and facilitated discontinuation of the agent in high-risk patients."( Ketorolac injection use in a university hospital.
Krstenansky, PM, 1993
)
1.73
"We identified five reports that specifically addressed intravenous dosing of ketorolac."( Pain management with intravenous ketorolac.
Kramer, MA; Miller, LJ, 1993
)
0.8
"Propofol infusion and supplemental fentanyl dosage requirements, oxygen saturation values, respiratory rates, recovery times, and postoperative side effects were recorded."( Use of analgesics during propofol sedation: a comparison of ketorolac, dezocine, and fentanyl.
Ramirez-Ruiz, M; Smith, I; White, PF, 1995
)
0.53
" Topical dosing led to relatively low aqueous and undetectable vitreous levels."( Intraocular penetration of periocular ketorolac and efficacy in experimental uveitis.
Fiscella, RG; Rabiah, PK; Tessler, HH, 1996
)
0.57
"To determine the incidence of side effects with the short-term use of intravenously administered ketorolac in children and the overall cost savings with a unit dosing system."( Safety of intravenous ketorolac therapy in children and cost savings with a unit dosing system.
Berde, CB; Houck, CS; McDermott, JS; Sethna, NF; Wilder, RT, 1996
)
0.83
" The relative bioavailabilities of ketorolac in the GCF after dosing with the dentifrice formulations with respect to the rinse were 89."( Evaluation of ketorolac concentrations in plasma and gingival crevicular fluid following topical treatment with oral rinses and dentifrices.
Bapat, NV; Buchanan, W; Collins, JG; Dobrozsi, DJ; Doyle, MJ; Eichhold, TH; Kelm, GR; Mankodi, SM; Meredith, MP; Offenbacher, S; Wehmeyer, KR, 1996
)
0.93
" The incidence of serious or fatal adverse events reported with ketorolac has decreased since revision of dosage guidelines."( Ketorolac. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in pain management.
Brogden, RN; Gillis, JC, 1997
)
1.98
" These pharmacokinetic differences indicate that a higher relative dosage is required in children, but the dosage interval is similar in children and adults."( Ketorolac for postoperative pain management in children.
Forrest, JB; Heitlinger, EL; Revell, S, 1997
)
1.74
"96) or a dose-response relationship (P = ."( Lack of hepatotoxic effects of parenteral ketorolac in the hospital setting.
Berlin, JA; Carson, JL; Farrar, J; Feldman, HI; Harb, G; Hennessy, S; Kimmel, SE; Kinman, JL; Strom, BL, 1997
)
0.56
" Footpad PG levels returned to base line or below within 5 min of dosing with ketorolac, which suggests rapid turnover of PG in the inflamed tissue."( Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 rapidly reverses inflammatory hyperalgesia and prostaglandin E2 production.
Isakson, PC; Portanova, J; Seibert, K; Shaffer, A; Zhang, Y, 1997
)
0.53
" However, smaller doses provided less effective pain relief, and a linear dose-response relationship was demonstrated."( The dose-response relationship of ketorolac as a component of intravenous regional anesthesia with lidocaine.
Gardner, G; Reuben, SS; Steinberg, RB, 1998
)
0.58
" Groups of six rats received either vehicle or analgesic drug and antinociception was evaluated by evaluating the dose-response curves over time."( Antinociceptive effects of S(+)-ketoprofen and other analgesic drugs in a rat model of pain induced by uric acid.
Cabré, F; Díaz, I; Fernández-Guasti, A; López-Muñoz, FJ; Mauleón, D; Tost, D; Ventura, R, 1998
)
0.3
" Adequate stable anesthesia was achieved in reduced dosage of conventional anesthesiological agents."( [Use of nonopiate agents for anesthesia in ENT patients at high surgical-anesthesiological risk].
Akopian, RG; Daĭkhes, NA; Davudov, KhSh; Gur'ianov, VA; Kokliaeva, NV; Kuĭian, SM; Nazhmudinov, II; Pogosov, VS; Riazanov, VB; Tiukov, VL, 1998
)
0.3
" The incidence of serious adverse events has declined since dosage guidelines were revised."( Minimising the adverse effects of ketorolac.
Reinhart, DI, 2000
)
0.59
"The demographic features, hernia types, anaesthetic time, dosage of anaesthetic medication and operative details of the two groups were comparable."( Prospective randomized trial of pre-emptive analgesics following ambulatory inguinal hernia repair: intravenous ketorolac versus diclofenac suppository.
Goh, LC; Lau, H; Lee, F; Patil, NG; Wong, C, 2002
)
0.53
" In this single-center, 7-day, prospective, double-blind, single-dose, crossover, parallel-group study, subjects were randomized to be bilaterally dosed with pemirolast, cromolyn, or ketorolac at each of 3 visits."( A combined analysis of two studies assessing the ocular comfort of antiallergy ophthalmic agents.
Amdahl, L; Graves, A; Shulman, DG; Washington, C, 2003
)
0.51
" Rats were anesthetized, then the electromyographic response in the rectus abdominus muscle and mean arterial blood pressure change to UCD was recorded before and with cumulative dosing of intravenous or intrathecal ketorolac."( Systemic, but not intrathecal ketorolac is antinociceptive to uterine cervical distension in rats.
Eisenach, JC; Sandner-Kiesling, A; Shin, SW, 2003
)
0.79
" as an initial dosing option for postoperative pain management in countries in which it is approved."( The analgesic efficacy of intramuscular parecoxib sodium in postoperative dental pain.
Daniels, S; Desjardins, PJ; Hubbard, RC; Mehlisch, DR, 2004
)
0.32
" Patients' demographic, surgical, and dosing data were collected."( Safety of ketorolac in neonates and infants after cardiac surgery.
Carberry, KE; Moffett, BS; Mott, AR; Wann, TI, 2006
)
0.74
"Ketorolac is a potent analgesic drug that has been restricted in dosage and use because of its potential adverse effects."( Report of an anaphylactoid and an anaphylactic reaction to ketorolac in two pediatric surgical patients.
Castillo-Peralta, LA; Castillo-Zamora, C; Nava-Ocampo, AA, 2006
)
2.02
" The MQS score accounted for variations in the types of analgesic medications, routes of administration, dosing schedules, and opioid dosing requirements."( Quantification of analgesic use in children with sickle cell disease.
Beyer, JE; Jacob, E; Miaskowski, C; Savedra, M; Styles, L; Treadwell, M, 2007
)
0.34
" Further studies of dosage (high/low) and duration of intraarticular treatment are warranted."( Reduced hospital stay and narcotic consumption, and improved mobilization with local and intraarticular infiltration after hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial of an intraarticular technique versus epidural infusion in 80 patients.
Andersen, KV; Haraldsted, V; Pfeiffer-Jensen, M; Søballe, K, 2007
)
0.34
"09% 6 hours and 12 hours preoperatively consistent with on-label dosing schedules."( Comparison of ketorolac 0.4% and bromfenac 0.09% at trough dosing: aqueous drug absorption and prostaglandin E2 levels.
Bucci, FA; Waterbury, LD, 2008
)
0.71
" The mean aqueous concentration of ketorolac and bromfenac at trough dosing was 130."( Comparison of ketorolac 0.4% and bromfenac 0.09% at trough dosing: aqueous drug absorption and prostaglandin E2 levels.
Bucci, FA; Waterbury, LD, 2008
)
0.98
" The longer half-lives and high apparent bioavailability after oral dosing are suggestive of a slow absorption process in the gastrointestinal tract and recycling."( Enantiomeric disposition of ketorolac in goats following administration of a single intravenous and oral dose.
Bell, EC; Copedge, KJ; Deshmukh, DD; Duran, SH; Martin, B; Miller, S; Nagilla, R; Ravis, WR, 2009
)
0.65
"IN ketorolac was well tolerated and effective in treating moderate-to-severe postoperative pain in inpatients; the convenience of IN dosing suggests that its usefulness in the ambulatory care setting should be evaluated."( Intranasal ketorolac for postoperative pain: a phase 3, double-blind, randomized study.
Bisley, E; Brown, C; Bynum, L; Moodie, J, 2009
)
1.36
" Use of a forearm tourniquet allows the dosage of local anesthetic to be decreased to almost half of what is required with an upper arm tourniquet, and the incidence of tourniquet pain has been reported to be less with forearm tourniquet."( Forearm IVRA, using 0.5% lidocaine in a dose of 1.5 mg/kg with ketorolac 0.15 mg/kg for hand and wrist surgeries.
Bhadoria, P; Bhagwat, A; Kohli, A; Singh, R, 2010
)
0.6
" Efficacy assessments included pain intensity, which was measured on a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale, total pain relief, and global pain evaluation up to 8 hours after dosing or until patients required rescue analgesia."( Intranasal ketorolac for pain secondary to third molar impaction surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Grant, GM; Mehlisch, DR, 2010
)
0.75
"a Continuous infusion of ketorolac provided effective analgesia after operation in children who underwent ureteroneocystostomy as well as a low dosage of fentanyl."( Ketorolac or fentanyl continuous infusion for post-operative analgesia in children undergoing ureteroneocystostomy.
Choi, EK; Hong, JY; Jo, YY; Kil, HK, 2011
)
2.12
" Pain levels were also recorded at 15 and 30 minutes after the initial IN dosing (before endodontic treatment); 30 minutes after completion of endodontic treatment; and 4, 8, and 12 hours after the initial IN spray."( Sniffing out endodontic pain: use of an intranasal analgesic in a randomized clinical trial.
Bowles, WR; Eggleston, GW; Johnson, N; Lunos, S; Turner, CL; Wiedmann, TS, 2011
)
0.37
" None of the treatments significantly affected the central models of pain at this dosage level."( A randomized, controlled trial validates a peripheral supra-additive antihyperalgesic effect of a paracetamol-ketorolac combination.
Besson, M; Daali, Y; Dayer, P; Desmeules, J; Ing Lorenzini, K; Salomon, D, 2011
)
0.58
" We proposed a systematic classification scheme using FDA-approved drug labeling to assess the DILI potential of drugs, which yielded a benchmark dataset with 287 drugs representing a wide range of therapeutic categories and daily dosage amounts."( FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
Chen, M; Fang, H; Liu, Z; Shi, Q; Tong, W; Vijay, V, 2011
)
0.37
" Effects of ketorolac dose were evaluated by pooling studies into 30- and 60-mg dosage groups."( Perioperative single dose ketorolac to prevent postoperative pain: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Agarwal, D; Benzon, HT; De Oliveira, GS, 2012
)
1.06
" On-label dosing of ketorolac (BID), bromfenac (BID), and nepafenac (TID) was instructed for 1 day prior to surgery."( A randomized comparison of to-aqueous penetration of ketorolac 0.45%, bromfenac 0.09% and nepafenac 0.1% in cataract patients undergoing phacoemulsification.
Bucci, FA; Waterbury, LD, 2011
)
0.94
"The objective of this investigation was to prepare mucoadhesive microspheres of ketorolac for nasal delivery to avoid gastrointestinal side effects of conventional dosage form."( Preparation and characterization of spray-dried mucoadhesive microspheres of ketorolac for nasal administration.
Chotai, NP; Nagda, CD; Nagda, DC; Patel, SB; Patel, UL, 2012
)
0.83
"1% at peak dosing levels in patients previously scheduled to undergo phacoemulsification."( Prostaglandin E2 inhibition of ketorolac 0.45%, bromfenac 0.09%, and nepafenac 0.1% in patients undergoing phacoemulsification.
Bucci, FA; Waterbury, LD, 2011
)
0.66
" Patients were instructed to take the NSAID per on-label dosing (twice daily [b."( Prostaglandin E2 inhibition of ketorolac 0.45%, bromfenac 0.09%, and nepafenac 0.1% in patients undergoing phacoemulsification.
Bucci, FA; Waterbury, LD, 2011
)
0.66
"1% and dosed 4 times a day starting 1 day before surgery and continuing for 4 weeks."( Prophylactic nepafenac and ketorolac versus placebo in preventing postoperative macular edema after uneventful phacoemulsification.
Almeida, DR; Bakar, SN; El-Defrawy, SR; Khan, Z; Rahim, K; Urton, T; Xing, L, 2012
)
0.68
" At present, information regarding epidural hematoma in the setting of a TID SC UFH dosing regimen does not exist in the literature."( Three-times-daily subcutaneous unfractionated heparin and neuraxial anesthesia: a retrospective review of 928 cases.
Bankhead, BR; Davis, JJ; Eckman, EJ; Strunk, J; Wallace, A,
)
0.13
" These results suggest that administration of NSAIDs into surgical wounds may be an analgesic alternative to higher systemic dosing of NSAIDs."( Postoperative subcutaneous instillation of low-dose ketorolac but not hydromorphone reduces wound exudate concentrations of interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 and improves analgesia following cesarean delivery.
Angst, MS; Carvalho, B; Lemmens, HJ; Ting, V, 2013
)
0.64
"A novel injectable formulation of diclofenac, Dyloject, utilizes hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD) as a solubilizing agent, allowing dosing as a small-volume intravenous bolus for postoperative pain."( Analgesic efficacy and safety of a novel injectable formulation of diclofenac compared with intravenous ketorolac and placebo after orthopedic surgery: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, multiple-dose trial.
Carr, DB; Daniels, S; Hamilton, DA; Lang, E; Melson, T, 2013
)
0.6
" In experiment 1, the blastocyst-forming rates per in vivo fertilized two-cell embryo showed an inverse relationship with a dosage of ketorolac (97."( Impact of ketorolac administration around ovarian stimulation on in vivo and in vitro fertilization and subsequent embryo development.
Jee, BC; Kim, JH; Kim, SH; Lee, JH; Suh, CS; Youm, HW, 2013
)
1
" In conclusion, ketorolac can be used in specific pediatric patients after cardiac surgery with minimal risk of bleeding or renal dysfunction with appropriate dosing and duration of use."( Ketorolac as an analgesic agent for infants and children after cardiac surgery: safety profile and appropriate patient selection.
Jalkut, MK,
)
1.92
"Transurothelial drug delivery continues to be an attractive treatment option for a range of urological conditions; however, dosing regimens remain largely empirical."( An ex vivo investigation into the transurothelial permeability and bladder wall distribution of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory ketorolac.
Al-Jayyoussi, G; Allender, CJ; Bowen, JL; Gumbleton, M; Harrah, T; Joshi, HB; Li, J; Raja, A; Williams, NA, 2014
)
0.61
" The formulation with the highest drug loading, entrapment efficiency, swelling, buoyancy, and in vitro release would be selected for further in vivo analgesic effect in the mice and pharmacokinetics study in rats compared to the tablet dosage form."( Pharmacokinetics and analgesic effect of ketorolac floating delivery system.
Abou El Ela, Ael S; El-Maraghy, DA; Hassan, MA; Radwan, MA, 2015
)
0.68
" Following implant surgery, postoperative pain was rated moderate or severe in 25/28 patients (89 percent), requiring prn analgesic dosing for up to 3 days in 14/25 individuals (56 percent)."( Characterization and treatment of postsurgical dental implant pain employing intranasal ketorolac.
Bockow, R; Bodner, L; Hersh, EV; Hutcheson, M; Korostoff, J; Pinto, A; Secreto, SA, 2013
)
0.61
" Our objective was to evaluate the impact of CPOE implementation on analgesic prescribing and dosing practices for renal colic presentations."( Computerized physician order entry and decision support improves ED analgesic ordering for renal colic.
Lang, E; Lonergan, K; McRae, A; Netherton, SJ; Wang, D, 2014
)
0.4
"The objective of this study was to determine the impact of a pharmacy-managed pharmacokinetic dosing program on appropriate dosing of famotidine, enoxaparin, and ketorolac."( Evaluation of a Pharmacy-Managed Pharmacokinetic Dosing Program.
Crannage, AJ; Korobey, MJ; Meyenburg, LK; Murphy, JA, 2015
)
0.61
"A large community teaching hospital implemented a pharmacy-managed pharmacokinetic dosing program for famotidine, enoxaparin, and ketorolac."( Evaluation of a Pharmacy-Managed Pharmacokinetic Dosing Program.
Crannage, AJ; Korobey, MJ; Meyenburg, LK; Murphy, JA, 2015
)
0.62
" In all, 66% of patients were dosed appropriately in the preimplementation group (famotidine 28%, enoxaparin 85%, and ketorolac 86%) compared to 94% in the postimplementation group (famotidine 92%, enoxaparin 95%, and ketorolac 94%), P < ."( Evaluation of a Pharmacy-Managed Pharmacokinetic Dosing Program.
Crannage, AJ; Korobey, MJ; Meyenburg, LK; Murphy, JA, 2015
)
0.63
"Implementation of a pharmacy-managed pharmacokinetic dosing program significantly improved appropriate dosing of famotidine, enoxaparin, and ketorolac."( Evaluation of a Pharmacy-Managed Pharmacokinetic Dosing Program.
Crannage, AJ; Korobey, MJ; Meyenburg, LK; Murphy, JA, 2015
)
0.62
" From the second to the fifth day of treatment, if patient had VAS >40 mm, increased dosage to four times per day was allowed."( Double-blind, randomized, double-dummy clinical trial comparing the efficacy of ketorolac trometamol and naproxen for acute low back pain.
Amazonas, RB; Bocchi de Oliveira, MF; Ecclissato, Cda C; Plapler, PG; Scheinberg, MA, 2016
)
0.66
"The dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine for multimodal post-cesarean analgesia suggests that 50μg produces analgesia similar to that produced by either 100μg or 150μg."( Dose-response of intrathecal morphine when administered with intravenous ketorolac for post-cesarean analgesia: a two-center, prospective, randomized, blinded trial.
Alshaeri, T; Amdur, RL; Berger, JS; Gonzalez, A; Hopkins, A; Jeon, D; Smiley, R; Wang, S, 2016
)
0.67
" Fentanyl and ketorolac dose-response relationships were evaluated for selected outcome variables."( Intramuscular Fentanyl and Ketorolac Associated with Superior Pain Control After Pediatric Bilateral Myringotomy and Tube Placement Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Cook-Sather, SD; Jantzen, EC; Jawad, AF; Li, Y; Long, AS; Muhly, WT; Polansky, M; Stricker, PA, 2017
)
1.11
"Pain was not better controlled with the addition of continuous infusions of morphine and midazolam when compared with intermittent dosing only."( Intermittent Versus Continuous and Intermittent Medications for Pain and Sedation After Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery; A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Brady, CM; Lefaiver, CA; Penk, JS; Steffensen, CM; Wittmayer, K, 2018
)
0.48
" The analysis in dosage form (eye drops) was a stability indicating one at which drugs were separated from possible degradation products arising from different stress conditions (in vitro analysis)."( Stability indicating HPLC-DAD method for analysis of Ketorolac binary and ternary mixtures in eye drops: Quantitative analysis in rabbit aqueous humor.
El Yazbi, FA; Hamdy, MMA; Hassan, EM; Khamis, EF; Ragab, MAA, 2017
)
0.7
"Concentrations of ketorolac when administered by the intracameral route in the dosing solution in dogs were found to be considerably higher in both aqueous and vitreous compared to what is achieved with topical dosing in patients."( Alternative Drug Delivery for Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery as Demonstrated in a Canine Model.
Waterbury, LD,
)
0.47
"The aim of this study was to review age- and weight-related effects on ketorolac pharmacokinetic parameters in children and current dosing schedules."( The pharmacokinetics of intravenous ketorolac in children aged 2 months to 16 years: A population analysis.
Anderson, BJ; Avram, MJ; Cameron, G; Christians, U; Cohen, MN; Dsida, RM; Engelhardt, T; Galinkin, JL; Hawwa, AF; Henthorn, TK; McLay, JS; Mohammed, BS, 2018
)
0.99
"The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of postoperative ketorolac administration (ie, dosage and duration of use) on pseudarthrosis following thoracolumbar posterolateral spinal fusions."( The Effect of Ketorolac on Thoracolumbar Posterolateral Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Ajiboye, RM; Drysch, A; Li, J; Orden, MH; Pourtaheri, S; Sharma, A, 2018
)
1.08
"We evaluated postoperative pain control and narcotic usage after thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the distal radius in patients given opiates with or without other non-opiate medication using a specific dosing regimen."( Multi-Modal Pain Control in Ambulatory Hand Surgery.
Awan, HM; DiMeo, T; Harrison, RK; Klinefelter, RD; Ruff, ME, 2018
)
0.48
" There was considerable heterogeneity among study designs, including the comparator arms (placebo, opioid, another NSAID, or a different regimen of ketorolac), dosing regimens (routes and timing of administration, single versus multiple dose), outcome assessment methods, and types of surgery."( Ketorolac for postoperative pain in children.
Cooper, TE; McNicol, ED; Rowe, E, 2018
)
2.12
" A secondary analysis assessed a dose-response association with anastomotic leak."( Ketorolac Use and Anastomotic Leak in Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Detailed Analysis.
Ford, MM; Geiger, TM; Hawkins, AT; Hopkins, MB; King, AB; Martin, BJ; McEvoy, MD; Muldoon, RL; Wanderer, JP, 2018
)
1.92
"It's time to review our dosing with ketorolac for acute pain management."( Less is more when it comes to ketorolac for pain.
Claus, LW; Lyon, C,
)
0.69
" Physicochemical properties, such as moisture, mucoadhesion, thickness, tensile strength, disintegration in phosphate buffer were determined in obtained samples of this dosage form."( Development of Composition and Technologies of Dental Film with Ketorolac Trometamine.
Anurova, MN; Bakhrushina, EO; Demina, NB; Kashperko, AS; Krasnyuk, II; Vakina, MG; Zhilyakova, ET, 2021
)
0.86
"Patients receiving Lidocaine - Ketorolac combination dosage had significantly lower VAS scores, and these results confirm that local injection of Lidocaine - Ketorolac combination had a superior pain-controlling effect during the first 24 hours after the biopsy procedure in comparison to Lidocaine injection alone, as measured by VAS score scale."( Ketorolac plus Lidocaine vs Lidocaine for pain relief following core needle soft tissue biopsy: A CONSORT-compliant double-blind randomized controlled study.
Chobpenthai, T; Ingviya, T; Jaiwithee, R; Sutthivaiyakit, K; Thanindratarn, P, 2021
)
2.35
"In our study, PAI in the shoulder after mini-open rotator cuff repair showed effective pain control on the day of the surgery, postponed the time of the first dosage of intravenous pain medication, and reduced the total dosage of the intravenous pain medication."( The efficacy of periarticular injection intraoperatively for mini-open rotator cuff repair: A comparative study.
Chang, MC; Chen, WM; Huang, CC; Huang, TF; Ma, HH, 2021
)
0.62
" Because of difficulty in accurately dosing indomethacin suppositories in pediatric patients, our center has used intravenous ketorolac for PEP prevention and present data on its safety and associated PEP rates."( Ketorolac Is Safe and Associated With Lower Rate of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis in Children With Pancreatic Duct Manipulation.
Kramer, RE; Mark, JA, 2021
)
2.27
" Immediately after surgery, administration of IVK resulted in statistically significant reduction in pain score regardless of the timing of dosing as compared with control patients (prior = 2."( Effect of Timing of Intravenous Ketorolac Administration on Pain in Orbitotomy Surgery.
Lee, KW; Tram, J; Wladis, EJ,
)
0.41
" The combination of additives and dosage are various and controversial."( Efficacy of Periarticular Multimodal Analgesic Injection Containing High-Dose Ketorolac versus Triamcinolone in Early Postoperative Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Apinyankul, R; Goodman, SB; Lilakhunakon, K; Vechvitvarakul, M; Witayakom, W, 2022
)
0.95
" Operation time, awakening time (time from drug withdrawal to consciousness recovery), the dosage of propofol, sufentanil, remifentanil, and intraoperative vasoactive drug dosage were recorded to compare."( Effect of ketorolac tromethamine combined with dezocine prior administration on hemodynamics and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair.
Cai, Z; Fu, B; Kang, Y; Li, Y; Wang, J; Wu, Y, 2022
)
1.12
"The prepared CS/Pl hydrogels demonstrated stimuli-controlled release with delivery of drug for prolonged period of time and thus can minimize dosing frequency, safe drug delivery, increased patient compliance and easiness."( Fabrication of pH responsive hydrogel blends of chondroitin sulfate/pluronic F-127 for the controlled release of ketorolac: its characterization and acute oral toxicity study.
Abdullah, Z; Afzal, S; Anjum, I; Badshah, SF; Barkat, K; Khalid, I; Khan, DH; Mehmood, Y; Naeem, S; Shabbir, M; Shamshad, N; Syed, MA, 2022
)
0.93
"In this prospective cohort study with comparisons to a historical control group, 24 patients were prospectively enrolled to receive an intraosseous infusion of morphine and ketorolac dosed according to age-based protocols while undergoing total knee arthroplasty."( A multimodal intraosseous infusion of morphine and ketorolac decreases early postoperative pain and opioid consumption following total knee arthroplasty.
Clyburn, TA; Incavo, SJ; Lambert, BS; Laurita, J; McNamara, CA; Park, KJ; Sullivan, TC, 2023
)
1.36
"Our multimodal intraosseous infusion of morphine and ketorolac dosed according to age-based protocols improved immediate postoperative pain levels and reduced opioid consumption in the immediate postoperative period for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty."( A multimodal intraosseous infusion of morphine and ketorolac decreases early postoperative pain and opioid consumption following total knee arthroplasty.
Clyburn, TA; Incavo, SJ; Lambert, BS; Laurita, J; McNamara, CA; Park, KJ; Sullivan, TC, 2023
)
1.41
"Previous evaluations of medication dosing variance for children in the prehospital setting have been limited regionally or to specific conditions."( Deviation From National Dosing Recommendations for Children Having Out-of-Hospital Emergencies.
Martin-Gill, C; Ramgopal, S, 2023
)
0.91
" We investigated dosing deviations (defined as being ≥20% of the weight-appropriate dose from national guidelines) for the following: lorazepam, diazepam, and midazolam for seizures; fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, and ketorolac; intramuscular epinephrine and diphenhydramine for children with allergy or anaphylaxis; intravenous epinephrine; and methylprednisolone."( Deviation From National Dosing Recommendations for Children Having Out-of-Hospital Emergencies.
Martin-Gill, C; Ramgopal, S, 2023
)
1.1
" Appropriate dosing was most common with methylprednisolone (75."( Deviation From National Dosing Recommendations for Children Having Out-of-Hospital Emergencies.
Martin-Gill, C; Ramgopal, S, 2023
)
0.91
"We identified variance in weight-based dosing from national guidelines for common pediatric medications in the prehospital setting, which may be attributable to protocol differences or dosing errors."( Deviation From National Dosing Recommendations for Children Having Out-of-Hospital Emergencies.
Martin-Gill, C; Ramgopal, S, 2023
)
0.91
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (4)

RoleDescription
cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitorA cyclooxygenase inhibitor that interferes with the action of cyclooxygenase 2.
cyclooxygenase 1 inhibitorA cyclooxygenase inhibitor that interferes with the action of cyclooxygenase 1.
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugAn anti-inflammatory drug that is not a steroid. In addition to anti-inflammatory actions, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have analgesic, antipyretic, and platelet-inhibitory actions. They act by blocking the synthesis of prostaglandins by inhibiting cyclooxygenase, which converts arachidonic acid to cyclic endoperoxides, precursors of prostaglandins.
analgesicAn agent capable of relieving pain without the loss of consciousness or without producing anaesthesia. In addition, analgesic is a role played by a compound which is exhibited by a capability to cause a reduction of pain symptoms.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (5)

ClassDescription
racemateA racemate is an equimolar mixture of a pair of enantiomers.
pyrrolizines
monocarboxylic acidAn oxoacid containing a single carboxy group.
aromatic ketoneA ketone in which the carbonyl group is attached to an aromatic ring.
amino acidA carboxylic acid containing one or more amino groups.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (1)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
Ketorolac Action Pathway2967

Protein Targets (21)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
LuciferasePhotinus pyralis (common eastern firefly)Potency11.42390.007215.758889.3584AID624030
thioredoxin reductaseRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency26.67950.100020.879379.4328AID488772; AID588456
EWS/FLI fusion proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency4.45870.001310.157742.8575AID1259252; AID1259253; AID1259255; AID1259256
euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency19.95260.035520.977089.1251AID504332
NPC intracellular cholesterol transporter 1 precursorHomo sapiens (human)Potency10.32250.01262.451825.0177AID485313
chromobox protein homolog 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency89.12510.006026.168889.1251AID488953
ras-related protein Rab-9AHomo sapiens (human)Potency3.66260.00022.621531.4954AID485297
Ataxin-2Homo sapiens (human)Potency7.94330.011912.222168.7989AID588378
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Fatty acid-binding protein, liverRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki65.30000.01501.24876.9200AID407366; AID407369
Fatty acid-binding protein, intestinalHomo sapiens (human)Ki9.40000.30005.48149.4000AID1801103
Prostaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01300.00021.557410.0000AID625243
Caspase-1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)4.64200.00201.70138.8000AID1802657
Prostaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.28200.00010.995010.0000AID1435604; AID625244
Caspase-3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)4.64200.00021.19798.8000AID1802657
Caspase-4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)4.64200.30002.26418.8000AID1802657
Caspase-5Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)4.64200.30002.23588.8000AID1802657
Caspase-9Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)4.64200.30002.26418.8000AID1802657
Cell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)2.00002.00005.50009.0000AID1435610
Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)2.00002.00004.53337.0000AID1435610
Serine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)36.00000.00020.30012.5000AID1435603
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Fatty acid-binding protein, intestinalHomo sapiens (human)Kd56.70000.36003.31757.2000AID1801104
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (277)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
cellular response to starvationAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitochondrial depolarizationAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to calcium ion starvationAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
cellular oxidant detoxificationAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
transportAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processFatty acid-binding protein, intestinalHomo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid transportFatty acid-binding protein, intestinalHomo sapiens (human)
intestinal lipid absorptionFatty acid-binding protein, intestinalHomo sapiens (human)
fatty acid transportFatty acid-binding protein, intestinalHomo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin biosynthetic processProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of blood pressureProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cyclooxygenase pathwayProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell population proliferationProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular oxidant detoxificationProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to organic substanceCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
pattern recognition receptor signaling pathwayCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
proteolysisCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
signal transductionCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
osmosensory signaling pathwayCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
protein autoprocessingCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-1 beta productionCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-18 productionCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
defense response to bacteriumCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in apoptotic processCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid biosynthetic processCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of inflammatory responseCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of inflammatory responseCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
protein maturationCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
defense response to virusCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
pyroptosisCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to lipopolysaccharideCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to mechanical stimulusCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to type II interferonCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
cytokine precursor processingCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor ligand precursor processingCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
AIM2 inflammasome complex assemblyCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin biosynthetic processProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
angiogenesisProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
embryo implantationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
learningProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
memoryProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of blood pressureProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to nematodeProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to fructoseProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to manganese ionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor productionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cyclooxygenase pathwayProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
bone mineralizationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of prostaglandin biosynthetic processProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fever generationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of synaptic plasticityProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of synaptic transmission, dopaminergicProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to estradiolProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to vitamin DProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to heatProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to tumor necrosis factorProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
maintenance of blood-brain barrierProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein import into nucleusProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
hair cycleProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of nitric oxide biosynthetic processProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell cycleProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vasoconstrictionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of smooth muscle contractionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle contractionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
decidualizationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of inflammatory responseProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
brown fat cell differentiationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to glucocorticoidProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of calcium ion transportProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of synaptic transmission, glutamatergicProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to fatty acidProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to mechanical stimulusProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to lead ionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ATPProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to non-ionic osmotic stressProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to fluid shear stressProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transforming growth factor beta productionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell migration involved in sprouting angiogenesisProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fibroblast growth factor productionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of brown fat cell differentiationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of platelet-derived growth factor productionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular oxidant detoxificationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of neuroinflammatory responseProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to osmotic stressProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to homocysteineProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to angiotensinProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
neurotrophin TRK receptor signaling pathwayCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
luteolysisCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to hypoxiaCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
B cell homeostasisCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cytokine productionCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
proteolysisCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
axonal fasciculationCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
heart developmentCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of soundCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
learning or memoryCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to osmotic stressCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to UVCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to woundingCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to glucoseCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to X-rayCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of macroautophagyCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein processingCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
hippocampus developmentCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein catabolic processCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
erythrocyte differentiationCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
platelet formationCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of B cell proliferationCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein stabilityCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to cobalt ionCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to estradiolCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
glial cell apoptotic processCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to tumor necrosis factorCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to nicotineCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to hydrogen peroxideCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
T cell homeostasisCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to amino acidCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast apoptotic processCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell fate commitmentCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell cycleCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of activated T cell proliferationCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
striated muscle cell differentiationCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to glucocorticoidCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein maturationCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
anterior neural tube closureCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
pyroptosisCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
leukocyte apoptotic processCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to staurosporineCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
apoptotic signaling pathwayCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
execution phase of apoptosisCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of pyroptosisCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of amyloid-beta formationCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell apoptotic processCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
keratinocyte differentiationCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
neuron differentiationCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
proteolysisCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
protein autoprocessingCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
defense response to bacteriumCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of inflammatory responseCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of inflammatory responseCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
defense response to Gram-positive bacteriumCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
protein maturationCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to endoplasmic reticulum stressCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
pyroptosisCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
non-canonical inflammasome complex assemblyCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to amyloid-betaCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-18-mediated signaling pathwayCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
proteolysisCaspase-5Homo sapiens (human)
substantia nigra developmentCaspase-5Homo sapiens (human)
protein maturationCaspase-5Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to mechanical stimulusCaspase-5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCaspase-5Homo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processCaspase-5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of inflammatory responseCaspase-5Homo sapiens (human)
response to hypoxiaCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
kidney developmentCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damageCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
activation of cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in apoptotic process by cytochrome cCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
protein processingCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
platelet formationCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
response to cobalt ionCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
response to estradiolCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
glial cell apoptotic processCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UVCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction in response to DNA damageCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast apoptotic processCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
protein maturationCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to dexamethasone stimulusCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
leukocyte apoptotic processCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell apoptotic processCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
activation of cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in apoptotic processCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
sprouting angiogenesisCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac conduction system developmentCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac neural crest cell migration involved in outflow tract morphogenesisCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
phagocytosis, engulfmentCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
actin filament organizationCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi organizationCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitotic nuclear divisionCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear migrationCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
establishment or maintenance of cell polarityCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
integrin-mediated signaling pathwayCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
protein localizationCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of lamellipodium assemblyCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of lamellipodium assemblyCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
substantia nigra developmentCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
actin cytoskeleton organizationCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
macrophage differentiationCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell growthCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell migrationCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of pseudopodium assemblyCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein-containing complex assemblyCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytokinesisCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of actin cytoskeleton organizationCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
cell junction assemblyCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
adherens junction organizationCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
embryonic heart tube developmentCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
dendritic cell migrationCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
neuropilin signaling pathwayCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
modulation by host of viral processCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
establishment of epithelial cell apical/basal polarityCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA replicationCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of JNK cascadeCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
filopodium assemblyCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of pinocytosisCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
neuron fate determinationCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of filopodium assemblyCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of filopodium assemblyCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of stress fiber assemblyCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of stress fiber assemblyCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
establishment of Golgi localizationCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of synapse structural plasticityCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transductionCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochoreCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
heart contractionCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
Wnt signaling pathway, planar cell polarity pathwayCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of epithelial cell proliferation involved in lung morphogenesisCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
submandibular salivary gland formationCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
dendritic spine morphogenesisCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to type II interferonCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
organelle transport along microtubuleCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
endothelin receptor signaling pathway involved in heart processCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
actin filament branchingCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intracellular protein transportCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of modification of postsynaptic structureCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynapse organizationCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
modification of synaptic structureCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of substrate adhesion-dependent cell spreadingCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
endocytosisCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
Cdc42 protein signal transductionCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of lamellipodium assemblyRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
actin cytoskeleton organizationRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
ruffle organizationRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
neuron migrationRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein phosphorylationRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor signaling pathwayRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell adhesionRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell-matrix adhesionRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
small GTPase-mediated signal transductionRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell sizeRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to woundingRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
anatomical structure morphogenesisRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of hydrogen peroxide metabolic processRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of lamellipodium assemblyRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of lamellipodium assemblyRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of endothelial cell migrationRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fibroblast migrationRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell-substrate adhesionRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell migrationRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
lamellipodium assemblyRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
actin filament polymerizationRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell migrationRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of microtubule polymerizationRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
ruffle organizationRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of interleukin-23 productionRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
substrate adhesion-dependent cell spreadingRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of Rho protein signal transductionRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular signal transductionRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of nitric oxide biosynthetic processRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
respiratory burstRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
hepatocyte growth factor receptor signaling pathwayRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of receptor-mediated endocytosisRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell motilityRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of stress fiber assemblyRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of stress fiber assemblyRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
localization within membraneRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of focal adhesion assemblyRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
Wnt signaling pathway, planar cell polarity pathwayRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of respiratory burstRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
semaphorin-plexin signaling pathwayRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neutrophil chemotaxisRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
ruffle assemblyRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of substrate adhesion-dependent cell spreadingRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
engulfment of apoptotic cellRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell projection assemblyRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
cortical cytoskeleton organizationRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of neutrophil migrationRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
establishment or maintenance of cell polarityRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell shapeRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
Rac protein signal transductionRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
actin filament organizationRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of actin cytoskeleton organizationRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell chemotaxisRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
motor neuron axon guidanceRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
MAPK cascadeSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell migrationSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
actin cytoskeleton organizationSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein phosphorylationSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
stimulatory C-type lectin receptor signaling pathwaySerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin remodelingSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphorylationSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
exocytosisSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferationSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphorylationSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
actin cytoskeleton organizationSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell migrationSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of microtubule polymerizationSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylationSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intracellular estrogen receptor signaling pathwaySerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
Fc-gamma receptor signaling pathway involved in phagocytosisSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
wound healingSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of JUN kinase activitySerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein autophosphorylationSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
hepatocyte growth factor receptor signaling pathwaySerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
ephrin receptor signaling pathwaySerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
branching morphogenesis of an epithelial tubeSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projection morphogenesisSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of stress fiber assemblySerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell proliferation involved in contact inhibitionSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of microtubule nucleationSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein localization to cytoplasmic stress granuleSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular signal transductionSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of actin cytoskeleton organizationSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of axonogenesisSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of MAPK cascadeSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of receptor internalizationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of translationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA metabolic processAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
P-body assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
stress granule assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA transportAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (64)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
oxygen bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
fatty acid bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
toxic substance bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
antioxidant activityAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
pyridoxal phosphate bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
exogenous protein bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
enterobactin bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid transmembrane transporter activityFatty acid-binding protein, intestinalHomo sapiens (human)
fatty acid bindingFatty acid-binding protein, intestinalHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingFatty acid-binding protein, intestinalHomo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid bindingFatty acid-binding protein, intestinalHomo sapiens (human)
peroxidase activityProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase activityProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activity, acting on single donors with incorporation of molecular oxygen, incorporation of two atoms of oxygenProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
cysteine-type endopeptidase activityCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
cysteine-type endopeptidase activator activity involved in apoptotic processCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
kinase bindingCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
cytokine bindingCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
CARD domain bindingCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
caspase bindingCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
peroxidase activityProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase activityProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activity, acting on single donors with incorporation of molecular oxygen, incorporation of two atoms of oxygenProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
aspartic-type endopeptidase activityCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
cysteine-type endopeptidase activityCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
cyclin-dependent protein serine/threonine kinase inhibitor activityCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
death receptor bindingCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
peptidase activityCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
phospholipase A2 activator activityCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex bindingCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in apoptotic processCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in apoptotic signaling pathwayCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in execution phase of apoptosisCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme activator activityCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
lipopolysaccharide bindingCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
cysteine-type endopeptidase activityCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
lipid bindingCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
CARD domain bindingCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in apoptotic processCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
cysteine-type endopeptidase activityCaspase-5Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCaspase-5Homo sapiens (human)
cysteine-type peptidase activityCaspase-5Homo sapiens (human)
cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in apoptotic processCaspase-5Homo sapiens (human)
cysteine-type endopeptidase activityCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme activator activityCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
peptidase activityCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
SH3 domain bindingCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase bindingCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in apoptotic processCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in apoptotic signaling pathwayCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
GTPase activityCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
G protein activityCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
GTP bindingCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase bindingCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
GTP-dependent protein bindingCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase bindingCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
thioesterase bindingCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
GBD domain bindingCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
apolipoprotein A-I receptor bindingCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase activityCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
GTPase activityRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein activityRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
GTP bindingRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase bindingRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
thioesterase bindingRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex bindingRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor bindingRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
small GTPase bindingSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase activitySerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein serine/threonine kinase activitySerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
collagen bindingSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
gamma-tubulin bindingSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein serine kinase activitySerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
epidermal growth factor receptor bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (79)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
extracellular regionAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum lumenAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
platelet alpha granule lumenAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
blood microparticleAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolFatty acid-binding protein, intestinalHomo sapiens (human)
microvillusFatty acid-binding protein, intestinalHomo sapiens (human)
apical cortexFatty acid-binding protein, intestinalHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolFatty acid-binding protein, intestinalHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusFatty acid-binding protein, intestinalHomo sapiens (human)
photoreceptor outer segmentProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionProstaglandin G/H synthase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
microtubuleCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
canonical inflammasome complexCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
NLRP1 inflammasome complexCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
NLRP3 inflammasome complexCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
AIM2 inflammasome complexCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
IPAF inflammasome complexCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
protease inhibitor complexCaspase-1Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear inner membraneProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear outer membraneProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum lumenProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
caveolaProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
death-inducing signaling complexCaspase-3Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
non-canonical inflammasome complexCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
NLRP1 inflammasome complexCaspase-4Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCaspase-5Homo sapiens (human)
NLRP1 inflammasome complexCaspase-5Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCaspase-5Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
caspase complexCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
apoptosomeCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCaspase-9Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
storage vacuoleCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
cell-cell junctionCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
membraneCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
secretory granuleCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
filopodiumCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
midbodyCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
leading edge membraneCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein granuleCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
dendritic spineCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
apical part of cellCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
phagocytic vesicleCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
spindle midzoneCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
mitotic spindleCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
Schaffer collateral - CA1 synapseCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapseCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi transport complexCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
dendritic spineCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCell division control protein 42 homologHomo sapiens (human)
actin filamentRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynapseRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapseRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
trans-Golgi networkRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell cortexRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
lamellipodiumRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule membraneRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
ruffle membraneRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein granuleRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
melanosomeRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
NADPH oxidase complexRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
dendritic spineRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule membraneRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic vesicleRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
dendritic spineRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoskeletonRas-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1Homo sapiens (human)
ruffleSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
chromosomeSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
actin filamentSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell-cell junctionSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercalated discSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
Z discSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
lamellipodiumSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
axonSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear membraneSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
ruffle membraneSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmSerine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
trans-Golgi networkAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
ribonucleoprotein complexAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (225)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID588378qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation
AID504836Inducers of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response (ERSR) in human glioma: Validation2002The Journal of biological chemistry, Apr-19, Volume: 277, Issue:16
Sustained ER Ca2+ depletion suppresses protein synthesis and induces activation-enhanced cell death in mast cells.
AID588349qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation of Cytotoxic Assay
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID371833AUC (0 to 6 hrs) in Wistar rat at 0.1 mg/kg, po2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1698005Ratio of drug level in Wistar Hannover rat blood to plasma administered through iv dosing by LC-MS/MS analysis
AID588216FDA HLAED, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID371828Gastrointestinal toxicity in fasted Swiss mouse assessed ulcer index at 0.1 mg/kg, po after 4 hrs2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID371830Half life in Wistar rat at 0.1 mg/kg, po2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID695270Antinociceptive activity in mouse up to 100 mg/kg, ip by hot plate test2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 22, Issue:7
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of carbamic acid 1-phenyl-3-(4-phenyl-piperazine-1-yl)-propyl ester derivatives as new analgesic agents.
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID588218FDA HLAED, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID29811Oral bioavailability in human2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID540217Volume of distribution at steady state in dog after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID1698001Lipophilicity, log D of the compound at pH 7.4 by by shake flask method
AID1435599Inhibition of PAK1/COX2 in human A549 cells harboring Ki-RAS mutant assessed as cell growth inhibition measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 1261,2,3-Triazolyl ester of Ketorolac: A "Click Chemistry"-based highly potent PAK1-blocking cancer-killer.
AID168946Antiinflammatory activity using cotton pellet assay1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acids and related compounds.
AID442307Antiinflammatory activity against carrageenan-induced paw oedema in albino rat assessed as inhibition of oedema at 39.23 mmol/kg, ip administered 1 hr before carrageenan challenge measured after 3 hrs relative to control2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 45, Issue:2
Novel substituted and fused pyrrolizine derivatives: synthesis, anti-inflammatory and ulcerogenecity studies.
AID29359Ionization constant (pKa)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID371831Tmax in Wistar rat at 0.1 mg/kg, po2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID168947Antiinflammatory activity using rat paw assay1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acids and related compounds.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID540221Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID540218Clearance in monkey after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID1636368Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 22.3 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of N2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID27167Delta logD (logD6.5 - logD7.4)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID540232Dose normalised AUC in monkey after po administration2005Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems, Feb, Volume: 35, Issue:2
Comparative evaluation of oral systemic exposure of 56 xenobiotics in rat, dog, monkey and human.
AID599064Plasma protein binding in human2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-15, Volume: 21, Issue:12
Lipophilicity of acidic compounds: impact of ion pair partitioning on drug design.
AID234213Therapeutic ratio of MED GI erosion to that of ED30 of rat paw1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 32, Issue:6
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-6-(methylthio)-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-ca rboxyl ic acids and 1-methyl-4-(methylthio)-5-aroylpyrrole-2-acetic acids.
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID442309Analgesic activity against acetic acid-induced writhing in albino mouse assessed as inhibition of writhing reflex at 39.23 mmol/kg, ip administered 1 hr before acetic acid challenge measured after 5 mins relative to control2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 45, Issue:2
Novel substituted and fused pyrrolizine derivatives: synthesis, anti-inflammatory and ulcerogenecity studies.
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID168943Antiinflammatory activity of compound determined by carrageenan rat paw edema assay1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acids and related compounds.
AID781329pKa (acid-base dissociation constant) as determined by other workers2014Pharmaceutical research, Apr, Volume: 31, Issue:4
Comparison of the accuracy of experimental and predicted pKa values of basic and acidic compounds.
AID371835Mean residence time in Wistar rat assessed as time required for 63.2% of administered dose to be eliminated at 0.1 mg/kg, po2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID396305Antiinflammatory activity against carrageenan-induced paw edema in Wistar rat at 2.5 mg/kg, po after 2 hrs2008European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 43, Issue:11
Synthesis, characterization and pharmacological evaluation of amide prodrugs of ketorolac.
AID168945Antiinflammatory activity using adjuvant arthritis assay.1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acids and related compounds.
AID371818Chemical stability assessed as hydrolysis half life in phosphate buffer at pH 7.42009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1212314Drug uptake in lysosomes of human Fa2N-4 cells assessed as inhibition of LysoTracker Red fluorescence after 30 mins2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 41, Issue:4
Lysosomal sequestration (trapping) of lipophilic amine (cationic amphiphilic) drugs in immortalized human hepatocytes (Fa2N-4 cells).
AID444053Renal clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1698000Apparent permeability in dog MDCKII-LE cells at pH 7.4
AID567091Drug absorption in human assessed as human intestinal absorption rate2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 46, Issue:1
Prediction of drug intestinal absorption by new linear and non-linear QSPR.
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID23697Partition coefficient (logP) (HPLC)1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acids and related compounds.
AID444054Oral bioavailability in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID588217FDA HLAED, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID588214FDA HLAED, liver enzyme composite activity2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID540220Clearance in human after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID177183Effective dose for cotton pellet assay1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acids and related compounds.
AID178497Antiinflammatory activity was assessed from the ability to inhibit adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 32, Issue:6
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-6-(methylthio)-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-ca rboxyl ic acids and 1-methyl-4-(methylthio)-5-aroylpyrrole-2-acetic acids.
AID371820Stability in rat plasma assessed as half life2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1698007Ratio of drug level in human blood to plasma administered through iv dosing by LC-MS/MS analysis
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID442308Antiinflammatory activity against carrageenan-induced paw oedema in albino rat assessed as inhibition of oedema at 39.23 mmol/kg, ip administered 1 hr before carrageenan challenge measured after 4 hrs relative to control2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 45, Issue:2
Novel substituted and fused pyrrolizine derivatives: synthesis, anti-inflammatory and ulcerogenecity studies.
AID371821Analgesic activity against acetic acid-induced writhing in po dosed Swiss mouse administered 1 hr before acetic acid challenge measured after 5 mins for 20 mins2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID239780Percentage plasma protein binding towards human serum albumin2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-07, Volume: 48, Issue:7
Predicting human serum albumin affinity of interleukin-8 (CXCL8) inhibitors by 3D-QSPR approach.
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1698008Hepatic clearance in Wistar Hannover rat at 1 mg/kg, iv
AID540215Volume of distribution at steady state in rat after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID540214Clearance in rat after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID395328Lipophilicity, log P of the compound2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 52, Issue:6
Relationship between brain tissue partitioning and microemulsion retention factors of CNS drugs.
AID425652Total body clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID5985261-Octanol-water distribution coefficient, log D of the compound at pH 7.4 by shake-flask method2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-15, Volume: 21, Issue:12
Lipophilicity of acidic compounds: impact of ion pair partitioning on drug design.
AID588219FDA HLAED, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1212341Cytotoxicity against human Fa2N-4 cells by lactate dehydrogenase assay2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 41, Issue:4
Lysosomal sequestration (trapping) of lipophilic amine (cationic amphiphilic) drugs in immortalized human hepatocytes (Fa2N-4 cells).
AID588215FDA HLAED, alkaline phosphatase increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID125932Analgesic activity of compound using carrageenan mouse phenylquinone writhing assay1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acids and related compounds.
AID371827Antiinflammatory activity in Swiss mouse assessed as reduction in carrageenan-induced hind paw edema at 10 mg/kg, po administered 1 hr before carrageenan challenge measured after 48 hrs2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID371832Cmax in Wistar rat at 0.1 mg/kg, po2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID625277FDA Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base Benchmark Dataset (LTKB-BD) drugs of less concern for DILI2011Drug discovery today, Aug, Volume: 16, Issue:15-16
FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
AID695275Antiinflammatory activity in rat persistent inflammatory pain model assessed as inhibition of carrageenan-induced mechanical hyperalgesia at 100 mg/kg, po2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 22, Issue:7
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of carbamic acid 1-phenyl-3-(4-phenyl-piperazine-1-yl)-propyl ester derivatives as new analgesic agents.
AID1236799Antiinflammatory activity in albino rat assessed as inhibition of carrageenan-induced paw edema at 30 mg/kg, ip administered 1 hr prior to carrageenan challenge measured 3 hrs after induction of inflammation relative to control2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-01, Volume: 23, Issue:13
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of bivalent benzoxazolone and benzothiazolone ligands as potential anti-inflammatory/analgesic agents.
AID592681Apparent permeability across human Caco2 cell membrane after 2 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 19, Issue:8
QSAR-based permeability model for drug-like compounds.
AID1698003Fraction unbound in rat plasma
AID1698004Fraction unbound in cynomolgus monkey plasma
AID1636482Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2C9-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 39 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of NAD2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID371825Antiinflammatory activity in po dosed Swiss mouse assessed as reduction in carrageenan-induced hind paw edema administered 1 hr before carrageenan challenge2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID425653Renal clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID1435610Inhibition of RAC1/CDC42 in human ovarian cancer cells2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 1261,2,3-Triazolyl ester of Ketorolac: A "Click Chemistry"-based highly potent PAK1-blocking cancer-killer.
AID396296Solubility in 1.0N HCl2008European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 43, Issue:11
Synthesis, characterization and pharmacological evaluation of amide prodrugs of ketorolac.
AID1698002Intrinsic clearance in cryopreserved human hepatocytes at 1 uM measured up to 120 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis
AID442305Antiinflammatory activity against carrageenan-induced paw oedema in albino rat assessed as inhibition of oedema at 39.23 mmol/kg, ip administered 1 hr before carrageenan challenge measured after 1 hr relative to control2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 45, Issue:2
Novel substituted and fused pyrrolizine derivatives: synthesis, anti-inflammatory and ulcerogenecity studies.
AID695273Antinociceptive activity in late phase po dosed mouse by formalin test2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 22, Issue:7
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of carbamic acid 1-phenyl-3-(4-phenyl-piperazine-1-yl)-propyl ester derivatives as new analgesic agents.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID126579Antiinflammatory activity using mouse writhing assay1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acids and related compounds.
AID540219Volume of distribution at steady state in monkey after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID395325Lipophilicity, log P by microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 52, Issue:6
Relationship between brain tissue partitioning and microemulsion retention factors of CNS drugs.
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID1698009Hepatic clearance in cynomolgus monkey at < 1 mg/kg, iv administered as cassette dosing
AID311367Permeability coefficient in human skin2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 15, Issue:22
Transdermal penetration behaviour of drugs: CART-clustering, QSPR and selection of model compounds.
AID540230Dose normalised AUC in rat after po administration2005Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems, Feb, Volume: 35, Issue:2
Comparative evaluation of oral systemic exposure of 56 xenobiotics in rat, dog, monkey and human.
AID442306Antiinflammatory activity against carrageenan-induced paw oedema in albino rat assessed as inhibition of oedema at 39.23 mmol/kg, ip administered 1 hr before carrageenan challenge measured after 2 hrs relative to control2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 45, Issue:2
Novel substituted and fused pyrrolizine derivatives: synthesis, anti-inflammatory and ulcerogenecity studies.
AID444057Fraction escaping hepatic elimination in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID371834AUMC (0 to 6 hrs) in Wistar rat at 0.1 mg/kg, po2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID371817Chemical stability assessed as hydrolysis half life in 0.1N HCl at pH 12009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID540233Dose normalised AUC in human after po administration2005Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems, Feb, Volume: 35, Issue:2
Comparative evaluation of oral systemic exposure of 56 xenobiotics in rat, dog, monkey and human.
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID224856Effect on acute pulmonary thromboembolism in mice at 100 mg/kg2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 43, Issue:20
Synthesis and hypolipidemic and antiplatelet activities of alpha-asarone isomers in humans (in vitro), mice (in vivo), and rats (in vivo).
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1435601Cytotoxicity against PAK1-independent mouse B16F10 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 1261,2,3-Triazolyl ester of Ketorolac: A "Click Chemistry"-based highly potent PAK1-blocking cancer-killer.
AID128488Analgesic activity was assessed from the ability to inhibit phenylquinone-induced writhing in mouse at a dose of 70 mg/kg1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 32, Issue:6
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-6-(methylthio)-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-ca rboxyl ic acids and 1-methyl-4-(methylthio)-5-aroylpyrrole-2-acetic acids.
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID371826Antiinflammatory activity in Swiss mouse assessed as reduction in carrageenan-induced hind paw edema at 0.1 mg/kg, po administered 1 hr before carrageenan challenge2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID1698011Fraction unbound in human plasma
AID1435607Drug-uptake in multidrug-resistant mouse EMT6 cells at 100 uM measured after 1 hr by HPLC method2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 1261,2,3-Triazolyl ester of Ketorolac: A "Click Chemistry"-based highly potent PAK1-blocking cancer-killer.
AID1697999Dissociation constant, acidic pKa of compound measured up to 18 mins by capillary electrophoresis
AID1435604Inhibition of recombinant human COX2 using arachidonic acid as substrate measured after 2 to 5 mins2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 1261,2,3-Triazolyl ester of Ketorolac: A "Click Chemistry"-based highly potent PAK1-blocking cancer-killer.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID396298Chloroform-acidic buffer partition coefficient, log K at pH 1.42008European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 43, Issue:11
Synthesis, characterization and pharmacological evaluation of amide prodrugs of ketorolac.
AID444052Hepatic clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID407366Displacement of 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulphonic acid from rat recombinant L-FABP high binding affinity site expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 by competitive fluorescence displacement assay2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-10, Volume: 51, Issue:13
Characterization of the drug binding specificity of rat liver fatty acid binding protein.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID396310Gastrointestinal toxicity in Wistar rat assessed as ulcerogenic indicates at dose equivalent to 1.2 mg/kg of ketorolac orally administered for 5 days2008European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 43, Issue:11
Synthesis, characterization and pharmacological evaluation of amide prodrugs of ketorolac.
AID444055Fraction absorbed in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID28681Partition coefficient (logD6.5)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID371837Elimination half life in Wistar rat at 0.1 mg/kg, po2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID1435603Inhibition of PAK1 in human A549 cells using myelin basic protein as substrate preincubated for 24 hrs followed by PAK1 immunoprecipation and substrate addition measured after 60 mins by ATP-Glo kinase assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 1261,2,3-Triazolyl ester of Ketorolac: A "Click Chemistry"-based highly potent PAK1-blocking cancer-killer.
AID131724Effective dose for mouse writhing assay1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acids and related compounds.
AID476929Human intestinal absorption in po dosed human2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 45, Issue:3
Neural computational prediction of oral drug absorption based on CODES 2D descriptors.
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID184866Minimum effective dose causing gastrointestinal erosion using seven-day chronic assay.1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acids and related compounds.
AID695272Antinociceptive activity in late phase ip dosed mouse by formalin test2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 22, Issue:7
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of carbamic acid 1-phenyl-3-(4-phenyl-piperazine-1-yl)-propyl ester derivatives as new analgesic agents.
AID26321Dissociation constant (pKa)1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acids and related compounds.
AID129290Antiinflammatory activity was assessed from the ability to inhibit cotton pellet granuloma in mice1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 32, Issue:6
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-6-(methylthio)-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-ca rboxyl ic acids and 1-methyl-4-(methylthio)-5-aroylpyrrole-2-acetic acids.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID235772Therapeutic ratio as the ratio of MED value to that of ED30 for the carrageenan rat paw assay.1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acids and related compounds.
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID371819Chemical stability assessed as hydrolysis half life in phosphate buffer at pH 8.02009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID1236800Antiinflammatory activity in albino rat assessed as inhibition of carrageenan-induced paw edema at 30 mg/kg, ip administered 1 hr prior to carrageenan challenge measured 4 hrs after induction of inflammation relative to control2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-01, Volume: 23, Issue:13
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of bivalent benzoxazolone and benzothiazolone ligands as potential anti-inflammatory/analgesic agents.
AID781330pKa (acid-base dissociation constant) as determined by potentiometric titration2014Pharmaceutical research, Apr, Volume: 31, Issue:4
Comparison of the accuracy of experimental and predicted pKa values of basic and acidic compounds.
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID444056Fraction escaping gut-wall elimination in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID177184Effective dose for rat paw assay1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acids and related compounds.
AID1236798Antiinflammatory activity in albino rat assessed as inhibition of carrageenan-induced paw edema at 30 mg/kg, ip administered 1 hr prior to carrageenan challenge measured 2 hrs after induction of inflammation relative to control2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-01, Volume: 23, Issue:13
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of bivalent benzoxazolone and benzothiazolone ligands as potential anti-inflammatory/analgesic agents.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID407369Displacement of 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulphonic acid from rat recombinant L-FABP low binding affinity site expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 by competitive fluorescence displacement assay2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-10, Volume: 51, Issue:13
Characterization of the drug binding specificity of rat liver fatty acid binding protein.
AID396294Solubility in 0.1 N NaOH2008European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 43, Issue:11
Synthesis, characterization and pharmacological evaluation of amide prodrugs of ketorolac.
AID160899Concentration required to inhibit 50% activity of prostaglandin synthetase was determined in vitro in mouse brain microsomes1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 34, Issue:3
Antinociceptive (aminoalkyl)indoles.
AID1636424Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2D6-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 17.6 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of N2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID1236797Antiinflammatory activity in albino rat assessed as inhibition of carrageenan-induced paw edema at 30 mg/kg, ip administered 1 hr prior to carrageenan challenge measured 1 hr after induction of inflammation relative to control2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-01, Volume: 23, Issue:13
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of bivalent benzoxazolone and benzothiazolone ligands as potential anti-inflammatory/analgesic agents.
AID371823Analgesic activity against acetic acid-induced writhing in Swiss mouse at 0.1 mg/kg, po administered 1 hr before acetic acid challenge measured after 5 mins for 20 mins2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID178380Effective dose causing 50 % gastrointestinal erosion using seven-day chronic assay.1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acids and related compounds.
AID540231Dose normalised AUC in dog after po administration2005Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems, Feb, Volume: 35, Issue:2
Comparative evaluation of oral systemic exposure of 56 xenobiotics in rat, dog, monkey and human.
AID371824Analgesic activity against magnesium sulfate-induced writhing in po dosed Swiss mouse administered 1 hr before magnesium sulfate challenge measured for 5 mins2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID371838Absorption half life in Wistar rat at 0.1 mg/kg, po2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID178384Effective dose for adjuvant arthritis assay1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acids and related compounds.
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID442310Gastrointestinal toxicity in albino rat assessed ulcer index at 39.23 mmol/kg, po2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 45, Issue:2
Novel substituted and fused pyrrolizine derivatives: synthesis, anti-inflammatory and ulcerogenecity studies.
AID371836Systemic clearance in Wistar rat at 0.1 mg/kg, po2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 52, Issue:12
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.
AID128161Acetylcholine writhing inhibitory activity measured in vivo in mouse by peroral administration1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 34, Issue:3
Antinociceptive (aminoalkyl)indoles.
AID184650Chronic gastrointestinal erosive activity in rats1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 32, Issue:6
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-6-(methylthio)-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-ca rboxyl ic acids and 1-methyl-4-(methylthio)-5-aroylpyrrole-2-acetic acids.
AID1698006Ratio of drug level in cynomolgus monkey blood to plasma administered through iv dosing by LC-MS/MS analysis
AID224688Effect on acute pulmonary thromboembolism in mice at 100 mg/kg expressed as no. of killed or paralyzed to no. of tested observed after 10 min2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 43, Issue:20
Synthesis and hypolipidemic and antiplatelet activities of alpha-asarone isomers in humans (in vitro), mice (in vivo), and rats (in vivo).
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID444058Volume of distribution at steady state in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID539464Solubility of the compound in 0.1 M phosphate buffer at 600 uM at pH 7.4 after 24 hrs by LC/MS/MS analysis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 20, Issue:24
Experimental solubility profiling of marketed CNS drugs, exploring solubility limit of CNS discovery candidate.
AID177015Antiinflammatory activity assessed by inhibition of carrageenan-induced edema in rats at a dose of 15 mg/kg1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 32, Issue:6
Synthesis and antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of 5-aroyl-6-(methylthio)-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrrole-1-ca rboxyl ic acids and 1-methyl-4-(methylthio)-5-aroylpyrrole-2-acetic acids.
AID540216Clearance in dog after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID396306Antiinflammatory activity against carrageenan-induced paw edema in Wistar rat at 2.5 mg/kg, po after 6 hrs2008European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 43, Issue:11
Synthesis, characterization and pharmacological evaluation of amide prodrugs of ketorolac.
AID396297Chloroform-PBS partition coefficient, log K at pH 7.42008European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 43, Issue:11
Synthesis, characterization and pharmacological evaluation of amide prodrugs of ketorolac.
AID677462Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 53Self-organizing molecular field analysis of NSAIDs: assessment of pharmacokinetic and physicochemical properties using 3D-QSPkR approach.
AID444051Total clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1435606Cytotoxicity against multidrug-resistant mouse EMT6 cells at 100 uM measured after 24 hrs by MTT assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 1261,2,3-Triazolyl ester of Ketorolac: A "Click Chemistry"-based highly potent PAK1-blocking cancer-killer.
AID1698010Hepatic clearance in human administered through iv dosing
AID5985271-Octanol-sodium citrate buffer distribution coefficient, log D of the compound at pH 5.5 by shake-flask method2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-15, Volume: 21, Issue:12
Lipophilicity of acidic compounds: impact of ion pair partitioning on drug design.
AID444050Fraction unbound in human plasma2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID598525Lipophilicity, log P of the compound2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-15, Volume: 21, Issue:12
Lipophilicity of acidic compounds: impact of ion pair partitioning on drug design.
AID243230Binding affinity towards human serum albumin2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-07, Volume: 48, Issue:7
Predicting human serum albumin affinity of interleukin-8 (CXCL8) inhibitors by 3D-QSPR approach.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
AID1345206Human COX-2 (Cyclooxygenase)2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-22, Volume: 54, Issue:24
Binding of ibuprofen, ketorolac, and diclofenac to COX-1 and COX-2 studied by saturation transfer difference NMR.
AID1345284Human COX-1 (Cyclooxygenase)2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-22, Volume: 54, Issue:24
Binding of ibuprofen, ketorolac, and diclofenac to COX-1 and COX-2 studied by saturation transfer difference NMR.
AID1345284Human COX-1 (Cyclooxygenase)1999Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Jun-22, Volume: 96, Issue:13
Nonsteroid drug selectivities for cyclo-oxygenase-1 rather than cyclo-oxygenase-2 are associated with human gastrointestinal toxicity: a full in vitro analysis.
AID1802657Caspase Catalytic Activity Assay from Article 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.02.003: \\Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Are Caspase Inhibitors.\\2017Cell chemical biology, Mar-16, Volume: 24, Issue:3
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Are Caspase Inhibitors.
AID1801104ITC Titration from Article 10.1021/cb5005178: \\Characterization of two distinct modes of drug binding to human intestinal fatty acid binding protein.\\2014ACS chemical biology, Nov-21, Volume: 9, Issue:11
Characterization of two distinct modes of drug binding to human intestinal fatty acid binding protein.
AID1801103Fluorophore Displacement Assay from Article 10.1021/cb5005178: \\Characterization of two distinct modes of drug binding to human intestinal fatty acid binding protein.\\2014ACS chemical biology, Nov-21, Volume: 9, Issue:11
Characterization of two distinct modes of drug binding to human intestinal fatty acid binding protein.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (1,621)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-199015 (0.93)18.7374
1990's427 (26.34)18.2507
2000's399 (24.61)29.6817
2010's534 (32.94)24.3611
2020's246 (15.18)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 130.85

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index130.85 (24.57)
Research Supply Index7.80 (2.92)
Research Growth Index6.35 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index243.82 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (130.85)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials668 (37.57%)5.53%
Reviews103 (5.79%)6.00%
Case Studies131 (7.37%)4.05%
Observational13 (0.73%)0.25%
Other863 (48.54%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (386)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Intravenous Ketorolac Vs. Morphine In Children Presenting With Acute Abdominal Pain And/or Suspected Appendicitis: A Multi-centre Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT06160778]Phase 3495 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-31Not yet recruiting
Total Knee Arthroplasty & Outcome: A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Adductor Canal Block and Femoral Nerve Block [NCT02082067]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Withdrawn
A Pilot Study of Biomarker Evaluation and Safety of Pre-Incisional Ketorolac for Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT04495894]Early Phase 176 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-24Recruiting
Disposition of Intravenous Ketorolac After Cesarean Section [NCT01291472]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
[NCT01339624]65 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Single Site Pharmacokinetic Non-interaction Study With Open-label, Randomized, Single-dose, Three-period, Six-sequence, Crossover Design to Compare Tramadol Hydrochloride 25 mg Capsules (Tradol [Trade Mark], Product of Grünenthal Mexico S.A. de C.V.) and [NCT03767036]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-05Completed
A Pilot Clinical Trial of a New Neuromodulation Device for Acute Attacks of Migraine in Children and Adolescents Visiting the Emergency Department [NCT05102591]Phase 340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-22Recruiting
The Use of Ketorolac in Surgical Neonates [NCT01667120]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Effect of Ketorolac Administration on Post-operative Narcotic Utilization and Union Rates in Great Toe Arthrodesis [NCT05054868]Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-14Recruiting
Study of Ketorolac Versus Opioid for Pain After Endoscopy (SKOPE): A Double-blinded Randomized Control Trial Comparing Outpatient Analgesic Efficacy of NSAIDs and Opioids in Patients Undergoing Ureteroscopy for Kidney Stones [NCT03888144]Phase 481 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-13Completed
Nepafenac Versus Ketorolac Eye Drops in Prevention of Intraoperative Miosis During Cataract Surgery [NCT03851172]Phase 275 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-01Not yet recruiting
Effects of a Surgical Site Injection on Pain Scores and Narcotic Use After Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery [NCT03693404]Phase 4190 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-01Completed
Double-blind, Prospective Comparison of Medications Used in Trigger Point Injections - Ketorolac, Lidocaine, or Dexamethasone [NCT03028012]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-02Terminated(stopped due to Poor enrollment.)
Prospective Comparative Study Between Ultrasound-guided Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block and the Use of Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia for Management of Pain in Patients With Multiple Fracture Ribs [NCT05975294]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-31Not yet recruiting
Scintigraphic Assessment of Nasal Deposition and Clearance of 99mTc DTPA Ketorolac Solution Administered Using the Valois Nasal Spray Device [NCT01356212]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-30Completed
Efficacy of Ketorolac and Lidocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocks in Patients With With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: a Prospective Double Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03410212]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-15Completed
Randomized, Prospective Study of the Assessment, Prevention and Management of Acute Post-herniotomy Pain [NCT01345162]Phase 4200 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Traditional vs. Nonopioid Analgesia After Rotator Cuff Repair [NCT03818919]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-22Recruiting
National, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Triple-dummy, Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Escócia Association in the Treatment of Acute Pain [NCT04666701]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to Strategy review)
Comparison Between the Effects of Intravenous Morphine, Tramadol and Ketorolac on Stress and Immune Responses in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy [NCT02449954]Phase 2/Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel, Single-dose Study of Intranasal Ketorolac in the Treatment of Pain Secondary to Dental Impaction Surgery [NCT01356225]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
Open Label, 2-Way Crossover Study to Assess the PK of Intranasal Ketorolac Tromethamine and to Assess the Effects of a Single Dose of Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride on the PK of Intranasal Ketorolac Tromethamine in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT01363089]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Effectiveness of Corticosteroid vs. Ketorolac Shoulder Injections: A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Trial [NCT04115644]Phase 482 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-01Terminated(stopped due to Covid-19 and we failed to submit annual report for 2017 and 2018)
A Randomized Control Trial Study of the Efficacy of Celecoxib Versus Ketorolac for Perioperative Pain Control [NCT03331315]Phase 2170 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-01Completed
Intranasal Ketorolac Versus Intravenous Ketorolac for Treatment of Migraine Headaches in Children: A Randomized Non-inferiority Clinical Trial [NCT02358681]Phase 359 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-16Completed
The Effect of Adding Ketorolac to Bupivacaine in Superficial Cervical Plexus Block in Thyroid Surgery. [NCT05180214]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-17Completed
Analgesic Efficacy of Intra-muscular Ketamine-ketorolac Versus Fentanyl- Ketorolac for Children Undergoing Bone Marrow Biopsy and Aspiration [NCT03649334]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-26Completed
Ibuprofen Versus Ketorolac by Mouth in the Treatment of Acute Pain From Osteoarticular Trauma: a Randomized Double-blind Controlled Study. [NCT04133623]Phase 3212 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-19Completed
Effect of Paracetamol and Ketorolac on RANK-L Levels in Patients Starting Orthodontic Treatment [NCT05383820]Phase 424 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-27Recruiting
Multimodal Anesthesia and Analgesia for Total Shoulder and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03586934]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Difficult to enroll patients for the study)
Ultrasound-guided (US) Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) for Acute Rib Fractures in the Emergency Department (ED) [NCT03619785]Phase 470 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-06Recruiting
A Phase 2, Open-Label Study of HTX 011 in a Multimodal Analgesic Regimen for Decreased Opioid Use Following Unilateral Open Inguinal Herniorrhaphy [NCT03695367]Phase 263 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-01Completed
Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Intra-Articular Ketorolac Injection for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Study [NCT03694821]Phase 418 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-05Terminated(stopped due to Low enrollment)
Effectiveness of Corticosteroid vs Ketorolac Shoulder Injections: a Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Trial [NCT04895280]Phase 4400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-04-30Not yet recruiting
A Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized Pilot Study Evaluating the Effects of Toradol and Lyrica Verses Placebo for Pain Control After Donor Nephrectomy (TORPEDO) [NCT03669081]Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-20Completed
A Phase 3, Double-blind, Randomized Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Analgesic Efficacy of Multiple Doses of Ketorolac Tromethamine Administered Intranasally for Postoperative Pain [NCT01347853]Phase 3300 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Impact of Local Anesthetic Wound Infiltration on Postoperative Pain Following Cesarean Delivery [NCT02829944]Phase 484 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-30Completed
Local Infiltration Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty - Efficacy of Multiple Bolus Injections With Ropivacaine and Ketorolac [NCT01344395]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
A Phase 1, Double-Blind, Study of the Tolerability of Formulations of Ketorolac Tromethamine Following Intranasal Administration in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01363063]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Comparison of Ketorolac Tromethamine 0.4% and Nepafenac 0.1% for the Prevention of Cystoid Macular Edema After Phacoemulsification: Prospective Randomized Double-masked Study [NCT02084576]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
A Single Arm, Open Label Study of the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of SPRIX (Intranasal Ketorolac Tromethamine) in 0 to 11 Year-Old Patients Undergoing Open Surgical Procedures [NCT02102516]Phase 345 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel) for Postoperative Pain Control for Open and Laparoscopic Abdominal Hernia Repair [NCT02128646]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
The Role of Inflammation and Vasodilatation in PACAP38-induced Headache Using MRI on Healthy Subjects [NCT03585894]34 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-01Completed
Ibuprofen Versus Ketorolac for Pain Relief During Hysterosalpingogram [NCT05190341]Phase 488 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-31Not yet recruiting
Traditional vs. Nonopioid Analgesia After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction [NCT03818932]Phase 2/Phase 362 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-22Completed
Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Femoral Nerve Block, Intraarticular Infiltration or a Combination of Both in the Control of Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty [NCT01304212]Phase 4137 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Effect of Toradol on Post-operative Foot and Ankle Healing [NCT03727048]Phase 4128 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Completed
Efficacy of IV Ibuprofen vs Ketorolac in Controlling Post Operative Pain in Colorectal Cancer Surgeries in Obese Patient: A Randomized Double Blinded Controlled Study [NCT05782608]8 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-01Not yet recruiting
Stimulating Catheter for Lumbar Plexus Block: Better Postoperative Analgesia? [NCT02162121]Phase 464 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [NCT03323684]159 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-01Completed
A Randomized Single Blinded Prospective Analysis for NSAID VS Corticosteroid Shoulder Injection in Diabetic Patients [NCT03319784]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-05Withdrawn(stopped due to never initiated)
Ketorolac as a Strategy for Reducing Post-operative Opioid Requirements in Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Undergoing Adenotonsillectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03467750]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-19Recruiting
An Analysis of the Functional Benefit, Narcotic Use and Time to Discharge Readiness Following the Implementation of a Comprehensive Pain Management Protocol for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty [NCT02474654]Phase 4220 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
Multimodal Nonopioid Pain Protocol Following Shoulder Arthroplasty Surgery [NCT05488847]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-25Recruiting
The Outcome of Preoperative Administration of Single-dose Ketorolac, Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug and Placebo on Postoperative Pain in Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis and Apical Periodontitis [NCT03116672]3 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-02Completed
Ketorolac Versus Triamcinolone Intra-articular Knee Injections for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis. A Prospective, Double-Blinded Randomized Trial [NCT02295189]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Comparison Between Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Wound Infiltration for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery [NCT02691572]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Completed
Adjuncts to Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia, a Comparison Between Ketorolac and Paracetamol [NCT03485625]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-21Completed
Preemptive Ketorolac for Intraoperative Shoulder Tip Pain During Cesarean Section: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. [NCT02380898]Phase 4200 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
Comparison of Intravenous Ketorolac 10, 20, and 30mg for Treating Renal Colic Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03665753]Early Phase 1165 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-05Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Control Trial of Ketorolac Versus Placebo on Opioid Analgesic Use, Estimated Blood Loss and Complications Following Cesarean Delivery With Epidural Morphine [NCT02509312]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
Efficacy of NSAID and Acetaminophen in the Control of Post-Operative Pain in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacement [NCT05393414]81 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-25Completed
Lidocaine Versus Ketorolac for the Management of Renal Colic [NCT03137498]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-06Recruiting
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Ranibizumab With and Without Ketorolac Eyedrops for Exudative Age-related Macular Degeneration [NCT02060604]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
Atomized Intranasal Vs Intravenous Ketorolac in Acute Renal Colic Pain Management: A Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Clinical Trial. [NCT04441762]Phase 2/Phase 3171 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-30Completed
Prophylactic Effect of Ketorolac Tromethamine on the Cystoid Macular Edema After Phacoemulsification in Diabetic Patients [NCT03551808]Phase 2102 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-01Recruiting
Intraarticular Injections of the Hip and Knee With Triamcinolone Versus Ketorolac: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04441112]Phase 2/Phase 3120 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-20Completed
Pain Management in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Insertion; Effectiveness of Bupivacaine, Ketorolac, Ketamine, vs Bupivacaine Alone in Reducing Postoperative Pocket Pain [NCT05575999]Phase 1200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-30Not yet recruiting
IV Meloxicam for Pain Management Post TJA: Prospective Randomized Trial [NCT05291598]Phase 3231 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-05-01Completed
Pharmacokinetics of Intranasal Ketorolac in Children [NCT02297906]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Enrolment issues)
Status Migrainosus - Differentiating Between Responders and Non-responders in the Setup of Real-life Clinical Practice [NCT03066544]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-30Recruiting
The Effect of Intra-operative Ketorolac on Hematoma Rates in Breast Reduction Surgery: A Double Blind Randomized Control Trial [NCT03535116]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-01Recruiting
Unravelling the Local and Systemic Effects of Primary Surgery and Perioperative Use of Ketorolac and Pregabalin in Primary Breast Cancer Patients According to Adiposity [NCT06150898]Phase 2112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-02-20Not yet recruiting
Suppression of Inflammation by Using NSAIDs During Peri-operative Period Can Affect the Prognosis of Breast Cancer. [NCT02141139]Phase 31,568 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-09-30Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial: Role of EFTs (Emotional Freedom Techniques) in Reducing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. [NCT02169856]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
The Effect of IV PCA With Ketorolac or Fentanyl Combined With Caudal Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Small Children Undergoing Intravesical Ureteroneocystostomy [NCT01081535]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Analgesic Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Intravenous N1539 in Subjects After Abdominal Laparoscopic Surgery [NCT01436032]Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Terminated
Ketorolac Plus Tobramycin/Dexamethasone vs. Tobramycin/Dexamethasone After Uneventful Phacoemulsification Surgery [NCT01103401]145 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Intraoperative Ketorolac Dose of 15 mg Versus the Standard 30 mg on Early Postoperative Pain After Spine Surgery: A Randomised, Blinded, Non-Inferiority Trial [NCT01230463]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-09-30Recruiting
Intrtavenous Ketorolac Versus Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia After Hypospadius Repair [NCT05194904]Phase 2/Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-31Not yet recruiting
[NCT01258309]Phase 3129 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Intravitreal Ketorolac for Chronic Uveitis:A Phase I Investigational Safety Study [NCT01164085]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
The Use of Intravenous Ketorolac in a Multimodal Approach to Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis [NCT04282200]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-24Enrolling by invitation
Local Infiltration Analgesia During Total Knee Arthroplasty - Reduced Opiate Consumption and Faster Mobilisation Postoperatively - Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01305733]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Active, not recruiting
Pain Management in Outpatient Urologic Procedures [NCT03393364]Early Phase 1150 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-01Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy Study of CA-008 in Subjects Undergoing Bunionectomy [NCT03599089]Phase 2147 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-09Completed
Comparison of Postoperative Side Effects and Analgesic Quality According to the Combination of Fentanyl and Ketorolac Versus Fentanyl After Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery [NCT05489796]72 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-06-30Completed
Autonomic Control of the Circulation and the Venous Distension Reflex [NCT03513770]Early Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-14Recruiting
An RCT of Metoclopramide/Diphenhydramine vs. Ketorolac Alone for Tension-type Headache [NCT01011673]Phase 4123 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Oral v. Parenteral Medications for the Emergency Management of Acute Migraine: a Pilot Randomized Control Trial [NCT05983354]55 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
Spinal Analgesia Versus Epidural Analgesia in Minor Laparotomic Liver Surgery in an Enhanced Recovery Programme: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02647047]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-01-31Not yet recruiting
Opioid-Free Versus Transitional Anesthetic With Opioids From Tonsillectomy [NCT04528173]Phase 4550 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-22Recruiting
Subacromial Injection of Methylprednisolone Versus Ketorolac to Treat Shoulder Impingement: a Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03913702]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-09Terminated(stopped due to Inadequate patient enrollment)
Modulation of Remifentanil-induced Analgesia and Postinfusion Hyperalgesia by Parecoxib or Ketorolac in Humans [NCT00785863]Phase 416 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Short-term Additive Effect of Topical Ketorolac on the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema With Intravitreal Bevacizumab [NCT04119921]Phase 2/Phase 326 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-01Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Periarticular Multimodal Drug Injections in Total Knee Arthroplasty [NCT00901628]Phase 4101 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Multimodal Drug Infiltration in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is Posterior Capsular Infiltration Worth the Risk? A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02860949]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Is Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Beneficial in Fracture Mandibular Surgeries? A Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT06167187]46 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-01Recruiting
Periarticular Bupivacaine + Meloxicam ER Solution Versus Standard Practice During Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single Institution, Single-blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT05188053]Phase 498 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-07Enrolling by invitation
Early Versus Late Deflation of Distal Tourniquet in Intravenous Regional Anesthesia With and Without Ketorolac in Hand & Forearm Surgery [NCT05234619]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-01Active, not recruiting
Fluoroscopic Guided Radiofrequency of Genicular Nerves for Pain Alleviation in Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis : A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT03224637]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Evaluating Pain Outcomes of Caudal vs Ilioinguinal Nerve Block in Children Undergoing Hernia Repair [NCT03041948]88 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-01Recruiting
Efficacy of Adrenaline in Periarticular Analgesic Injection on Postoperative Pain Control After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03549221]Phase 282 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-26Recruiting
Comparative Study Between the Effect of Diclofanic and Ketorolac in Post Tonsillectomy Pain Management [NCT03178539]Phase 2/Phase 3100 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Completed
Dosing of Ketorolac Impacts Post-cesarean paiN manaGemenet (KING): A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05248984]92 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-06-08Active, not recruiting
Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Ibuprofen Versus Ketorolac in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery [NCT05695664]Early Phase 1100 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-01Completed
Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Using Liposomal Bupivacaine With Pre-incisional Bupivacaine for Post-operative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic or Robotic Hysterectomy [NCT02400645]Phase 169 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Terminated(stopped due to It was determined that one member of the team had falsified data.)
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Double-Blind of Post-Operative Analgesic Effects of Local Wound Infiltration With Ketorolac After Inguinal Herniorrhaphy [NCT03534505]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-01Terminated(stopped due to cannot enroll patient)
A Randomized Blinded Placebo Controlled Trial Assessing Ketorolac (Toradol) at Oocyte Retrieval [NCT06026553]Phase 1400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-10Recruiting
"ICE-T Postoperative Multimodal Pain Regimen Compared to the Standard Regimen in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial" [NCT03987022]Phase 466 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-01Completed
[NCT00904904]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Postoperative Pain Management Following Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Comparison Between Local Infiltration Analgesia and Ultrasound Guided 3-in-1 Block [NCT02568995]Phase 355 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Topical Steroids Versus Topical Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Following Ahmed Valve Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery [NCT00956462]36 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-07-31Recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial of IV Ketorolac to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis [NCT02465138]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of Funding)
A Phase 2, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Analgesic Efficacy of Ketorolac Tromethamine Administered Intranasally for the Acute Treatment of Migraine [NCT00483717]Phase 2173 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
Local Infiltration Analgesia With Ropivacaine, Ketorolac and Epinephrine Intra- and Postoperatively in Total Knee Arthroplasty [NCT00799175]48 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Local Infiltration Analgesia or Intrathecal Morphine in Total Knee Arthroplasty [NCT00992082]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-08-31Recruiting
Prospective Evaluation of the Effects of IV Ketorolac on Platelet Function Post-Cesarean Delivery [NCT03805607]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-18Active, not recruiting
Vitreous Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drus Concentrations And Prostaglandin E2 Levels in Vitrectomy Patients Treated With Indomethacin 0.5%, Bromfenac 0.09%, and Nepafenac 0.1% [NCT02361645]Phase 370 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
Postoperative Pain Treatment in Total Hip Arthroplasty A Randomized Double-blinded Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Effect of Local Analgesia [NCT00603083]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
To Evaluate the Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of Intranasal Ketorolac Tromethamine (Sprix) as an Option for Acute (up to 5 Days) Pain Management Adult Interstitial Cystitis Patients Experiencing a Flare of Pain [NCT02000401]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Topical 0.4% Ketorolac for the Inhibition of Miosis During Vitreoretinal Surgery: a Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-masked Study [NCT00576329]Phase 2/Phase 376 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
The Analgesic Effects of Morphine Versus Ketorolac in Low Back Pain [NCT02782286]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-31Not yet recruiting
Efficacy of Multimodal Peri- and Intraarticular Drug Injections in Total Knee Arthroplasty [NCT00562627]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Tolerability and Toxicity of Topically Applied Nepafenac 0.3% vs Ketorolac 0.5% [NCT02752646]200 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
The Effect of Preoperative Topical Ketorolac 0.45% on Aqueous Cytokine Levels and Macular Thickness in Diabetic and Non Diabetic Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery [NCT02646072]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Pre-operative Ketorolac Administration Has no Pre-emptive Analgesic Effect Following Total Abdominal Hysterectomy [NCT02642718]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
Post ERCP Pancreatitis Prophylaxis, Effectiveness of Rectal Indomethacin vs Intravenous Ketorolac in the Pediatric Population [NCT05664074]Phase 4192 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-07Recruiting
Oral Ketorolac as an Adjuvant Agent for Postoperative Pain Control Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair [NCT03967847]Phase 344 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-11Completed
IM Ketorolac vs Diclofenac Potassium Powder for Oral Solution (Cambia) for the Acute Treatment of Severe Migraine [NCT02664116]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-01-31Recruiting
Efficacy of Ketorolac Buccal Infiltration on Success Rate of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial [NCT02536430]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
Prospective, Randomized, Allocation-Concealed, Blinded Study Designed to Compare Ketorolac Sublingual and Fentanyl Intranasal in Pain Control for Bilateral Myringotomy and Tubes (BMT) Placement in Children [NCT02653742]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-05-31Recruiting
An Open-Label Study of Intraoperative CA-008 Administration in Subjects Undergoing Bunionectomy [NCT03885596]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-25Completed
Intra-nasal Ketorolac Versus Oral Diclofenac for Acute Ureteral Stent-associated Pain Following Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease [NCT06158620]Phase 1/Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-02-01Not yet recruiting
Efficacy of Nasal Migraine Cocktail Used In Pediatric Emergency Department: A Clinical Trial [NCT06083571]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
A Prospective Randomized Trial of Sublingual Ketorolac Compared to Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Bilateral Myringotomy [NCT03742180]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Unavailable drug in Egypt.)
Efficacy of Topic Antiinflammatory Therapy Treatment in Center Point Thickness Secondary to Selective Photocoagulation in Diabetic Macular Edema [NCT00900887]Phase 284 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Battlefield Acupuncture for Acute/Subacute Back Pain in the Emergency Department [NCT03996564]26 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-22Completed
A Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Clinical Trial of Prophylactic Ketorolac 0.5% in Patients Undergoing Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Phacovitrectomy Epiretinal Membrane Peel Surgery: Assessing Macular Volume With Spectral-domain OCT [NCT00974753]18 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-and Placebo-Controlled Study of the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Repeated Dosing of DIC075V Versus Parenteral Ketorolac and Placebo in Acute Post-Operative Pain After Elective Orthopedic Surgery [NCT00507026]Phase 3277 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-25Completed
Does Sugared or Sugar Free Chewing Gum Reduces Postoperative Ileus After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [NCT02162134]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Traditional vs. Nonopioid Analgesia After Arthroscopic Meniscus Surgery [NCT03820193]Early Phase 161 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-22Completed
Premedication Efficacy of Oral Ketorolac and Ketorolac/ Acetaminophen on Post Endodontic Treatment Pain [NCT02614118]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Comparison of Patient-controlled Analgesia With Background Opioid Versus Non-opioid Infusion for Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Randomized, Non-inferiority Study [NCT05861791]98 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-07Recruiting
Effects of Pre-emptive Scalp Infiltration With Ketorolac and Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain Relief After Elective Supratentorial Craniotomy (PAINLESS) [NCT04141319]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-31Not yet recruiting
Comparing the Efficacies Between the Spray of S.L. Spray Solution and Difflam and Acular to Release Postoperative Sore Throat [NCT02608788]Phase 4380 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
A Prospective Trial Evaluating a Intracanalicular Insert Delivery System Compared to Traditional Topical Drops in Controlling Post-operative Pain and inFlammation in Subjects Undergoing Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery [NCT04205916]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-04Recruiting
Ketorolac in Palatoplasty: A Randomized Blinded Controlled Trial. [NCT04771156]Phase 474 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-17Recruiting
Comparison of Ketorolac and Ketorolac/Acetaminophen on Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Injection [NCT02601911]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Local Multimodal Injection in Controlling Pain, Limiting Complications, and Reducing Cost as Compared to Regional Anesthesia for Treating Rotational Ankle Fractures. [NCT05019638]Early Phase 1200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-15Enrolling by invitation
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Topical Prednisolone Acetate 1%, Nepafenac of 0.1% and Ketorolac Tromethamine 0.4% in Intra-operative Mydriasis in Facetectomies [NCT00865540]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Active, not recruiting
Effect of Intracameral Phenylephrine/Ketorolac on Intraoperative Pain [NCT04829799]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to Per study team, the study will not proceed)
Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis With Ketorolac [NCT02885441]Phase 456 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Terminated
Comparison of Teh TEMPEffect of Subgingival Irrigation Wif Ketorolac and Chlorhexidine in Patients Wif Chronic Periodontist. [NCT03836781]Phase 2/Phase 32 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-10Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Topic Ketorolac to Treat Center Point Thickness Secondary to Panphotocoagulation in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy [NCT00907114]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Open-Label, Randomized, Single-Dose, Four-Treatment Crossover Study to Evaluate Platelet Function in Healthy Adult Males After Administration of IV Diclofenac Sodium, Oral Diclofenac Potasssium, IV Ketorolac Tromethamine, and Acetylsalicylic Acid [NCT00548678]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Pilot Study on the Use of Methoxyflurane (Penthrox®) for Pain Control in the Emergency Department [NCT04618497]Phase 340 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-28Completed
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Prophylactic Nepafenac 0.1% and Ketorolac 0.5% Versus Placebo in Preventing Postoperative Macular Edema After Uncomplicated Phacoemulsification Cataract Extraction (PNK) [NCT01395069]Phase 4162 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Opioid-Free Pain Control Regimen Following Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05597878]Phase 2/Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-18Recruiting
Periarticular Injection and Hamstring Block Versus Placebo for Pain Control in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05248724]44 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-01Completed
A Randomized Control Trial Evaluating Pain Outcomes of Ketorolac Administration in Children Undergoing Circumcision [NCT04646967]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-25Recruiting
Acute Pain and Role of Ketolorac in Inflammatory Mediators After Knee Arthroscopy Evaluated by Microdialysis [NCT00774540]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Effects of Ketorolac on Post-Operative Febrile Morbidity and Pain Management in Abdominal Myomectomy Patients [NCT00845754]112 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-09-30Completed
A Phase 1 Safety and Pharmacokinetics Study of Intranasal Ketorolac in Elderly and Nonelderly Adult Healthy Subjects [NCT01365624]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Single Blind RCT to Evaluate the Effect of Ketorolac in Upper Extremity Tendinopathy and Arthropathy [NCT05292339]Phase 4160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-31Recruiting
Premedication Efficacy of Ketorolac Infiltration on Post Endodontic Pain [NCT02923687]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
Triamcinolone Ketorolac (TriKe) Knee Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness and Possible Superiority of Ketorolac vs. Cortisone When Injected Intra-Articular in Subjects With Osteoarthrosis [NCT05336968]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-15Enrolling by invitation
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Scoliotic Adolescents Undergoing Posterior Spine Instrumentation . A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03968146]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-18Completed
Ketorolac Versus Ibuprofen for the Painful Crisis of Sickle Cell Disease - Southwestern Comprehensive Sickle Cell Center [NCT00115336]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor accrual)
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo- and Active-Comparator-Controlled, Single-Dose Study to Assess the Efficacy of KAI-1678 Administered by Subcutaneous Infusion for the Treatment of Postoperative Pain [NCT01015235]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
The Interaction of Nociceptive Stimulation and Various Antinociceptive Modalities on Ischemia Reperfusion Injury [NCT01932918]142 participants (Actual)Observational2011-01-31Completed
Intravenous Ketorolac Administration to Attenuate Post-procedural Pain Associated With Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial [NCT05875571]Phase 418 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-30Not yet recruiting
Dose Response of Ketorolac in Out-Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopy [NCT02181426]112 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ketorolac in the Management of Post-Operative Pain After Heart Surgery [NCT00161577]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Ketorolac Verses Paracetamol as an Adjunct to Nalbuphine in Post Operative Pain Management in Elective Cardiac Surgery [NCT05361824]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-01Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Ketorolac Tromethamine (SPRIX) as a Short Term Pain Management Tool for Adult Male Patients With Post-Vasectomy Pain [NCT02000388]Phase 415 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-02-29Enrolling by invitation
Multimodal Pain Management After Robotic-Assisted Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy [NCT04429022]Phase 368 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-24Completed
Randomized Clinical Trial of Pregabalin for Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome [NCT03017430]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
A Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled, Equivalence Study Comparing Intra-articular Corticosteroid to Intra-articular Ketorolac Knee Injections [NCT02612272]Phase 4448 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-11-30Recruiting
Inflammatory Response to Trauma - Does Early Cytokine Modulation Improve Patient Outcome [NCT03671746]Phase 170 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-28Completed
Ultrasound Guided Sacroiliac Joint Injections With Ketorolac Versus Corticosteroid: A Prospective Non-inferiority Study [NCT06081101]Early Phase 180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-31Not yet recruiting
The Role of Prostaglandins in the Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy and the Therapeutic Efficacy of Topical Ketorolac (Acuvail) [NCT01609881]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Due to lack of funding)
The Effect of Intravenous Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Intravenous Corticosteroids on the Likelihood of Dysphagia and Dysphonia Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion [NCT04650893]Phase 375 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-02Recruiting
Ultrasound Guided Motor Sparing Knee Blocks With or Without Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia Following Knee Arthroplasty: a Randomized Double Blinded Study [NCT02540070]Phase 3135 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-08-31Recruiting
Preoperative Ketorolac for Intraoperative and Postoperative Pain Management in Scleral Buckling Surgery Under Retrobulbar Block Anesthesia: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study [NCT02729285]Phase 473 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Ketorolac as an Adjuvant Agent for Postoperative Pain Control Following Arthroscopic Meniscus Surgery [NCT04246541]Phase 348 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-23Completed
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Preoperative Topical Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs or Steroids Compared to Placebo With Regard to Clinical Outcomes Following Trabeculectomy. [NCT00707421]Phase 362 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
A Prospective Randomized Case Series Comparison on the Clinical Efficacy of Exparel Local Anesthetic in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients [NCT02765815]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Withdrawn(stopped due to competing protocol)
Atropine in Laparoscopic Gynaecological Surgery (The ALGOS Trial) A Randomised, Double Blind, Controlled Trial [NCT02769325]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-31Not yet recruiting
Pain Management in Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Keratoconus: Prospective Randomized Study [NCT02867176]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
Open Label Randomized Study for Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Ketorolac Tromethamine and Ketoprofen in Gel in Patients With Gonarthrosis and Low Back Pain [NCT02638831]Phase 4240 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Post Operative Pain and Expression of Substance P, IL8 After the Use of Ketorolac Irrigant Following Single Visit Root Canal Treatment [NCT04319549]44 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-01Not yet recruiting
Esketamine vs. Ketorolac for Prevention of Postoperative Pain and Cognitive Dysfunction After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients: a Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial [NCT05132595]160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-30Recruiting
The Analgesic Efficacy of Adding Magnesium Sulfate Versus Ketorolac to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block (A Prospective- Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial) [NCT04554862]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-01Completed
The Analgesic Effects of Morphine Versus Ketorolac in Renal Colic [NCT02782273]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-31Not yet recruiting
Opiate Free Multimodal Pain Pathway in Elective Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Prospective Study [NCT04771741]72 participants (Actual)Observational2020-12-01Completed
Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy To Non-Inferiority Comparison Of Ketorolac Tromethamine Oral Drops Versus Naproxen For Moderate to Severe Back Pain Treatment [NCT01471899]Phase 378 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group, Active and Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of NTM-001 for the Treatment of Moderately Severe Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy [NCT05324358]Phase 3360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-15Recruiting
A Single Center, Prospective Randomized Double-blind Trial: Efficacy of Nefopam and Morphine in Balanced Analgesia for Acute Ureteric Colic [NCT01543165]Phase 4111 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-12-31Recruiting
Trigger Point Injection for Myofascial Pain Syndrome in the Low Back (T-PIMPS): A Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT04704297]Phase 4180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-28Recruiting
A 3-Month Clinical Safety Comparison of Nevanac 0.1% to Acular LS 0.4% and Vehicle Following Cataract Surgery [NCT00332774]Phase 3149 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Perioperative Ketorolac in High Risk Breast Cancer Patients With and Without Inflammation. A Prospective Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial. [NCT01806259]Phase 3203 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Tobramycin 0.3% - Dexamethasone 0.1% Versus Tobramycin 0.3% - Dexamethasone 0.1% Plus Ketorolac Tromethamine 0.5% After Phacoemulsification Surgery. A Randomized Trial [NCT00992355]97 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Randomized Controlled Trial on Effectiveness of Ketorolac and Tramadol in Not Compound Fractures of Child [NCT00560443]Phase 4133 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Comparative Randomized Controlled Trial Study of General Balanced Anesthesia Based on Opioid and Opioid Sparing Balanced Anesthesia for Cholecystectomy Surgery Via Laparoscopy: Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes [NCT02953210]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-30Enrolling by invitation
Comparing the Efficacy of Parecoxib and Ketorolac as Preemptive Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion [NCT01859585]Phase 496 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Comparison of Intranasal Desmopressin vs IV Ketorolac in Renal Colic Patients [NCT02937896]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Steroids And Laser Trabeculoplasty (SALT) Trial: Effect of Anti-Inflammatory Treatment on the Efficacy of SLT [NCT00981435]Phase 497 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Evaluation of Perioperative Usage of Ketorolac on Postoperative Pain Reduction in Pediatric Patients With Adenotonsillectom [NCT05074056]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-08Recruiting
A Comparison of Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) Inhibition of Acuvail, Xibrom and Nevanac in Patients Undergoing Phacoemulsification [NCT01021761]Phase 4126 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
"THINK Trial: Treatment of Headache With IntraNasal Ketamine: A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Intranasal Ketamine Versus Standard Therapy in the Management of Primary Headache Syndromes in the Emergency Department" [NCT03081416]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
A Randomized Trial Comparing the Combination of Intravenous Lidocaine and Ketorolac to Either Analgesics Alone for ED Patients With Acute Renal Colic [NCT02902770]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Completed
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial for Pain Relief After Office Ureteral Stent Removal [NCT04112160]Phase 2125 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-28Completed
A Randomized Double-blind Comparative Efficacy Trial of IV Acetaminophen Versus IV Ketorolac for Emergency Department Treatment of Generalized Headache [NCT03472872]Phase 4500 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-05Terminated(stopped due to no longer recruiting or studying)
Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase IIB Trial of Ketorolac Mouth Rinse Evaluating the Effect of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition on Oropharyngeal Leukoplakia: Collaborative Study of the NCI, NIDCD and the NIDCR [NCT00001698]Phase 257 participants Interventional1998-06-30Completed
Randomized, Double-Blind, Active- and Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Repeated Dosing of DIC075V Relative To Parenteral Ketorolac and Placebo in Patients With Acute Post-Op Pain After Abdominal or Pelvic Surgery [NCT00448110]Phase 3331 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Double Masked Evaluation of Acular LS Versus Nevanac for Postoperative Pain Control in Eyes Undergoing PRK [NCT00347204]Phase 440 participants Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Postoperative Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Comparison of Continuous Epidural Infusion and Wound Infiltration With Continuous Intraarticular Infusion [NCT00421967]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Interim analysis)
Betamethason Versus Ketorolac Injection for the Treatment of DeQuervains Tenosynovitis [NCT02604537]Phase 464 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-15Active, not recruiting
Bromfenac 0.09% vs. Ketorolac 0.4% During the Induction Phase of Treatment With Topical Cyclosporine for Chronic Dry Eye Patients [NCT00520260]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Effect of Ketorolac Premedication on Anesthetic Efficiency of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block, Pre-Treatment and Post-Endodontic Pain in Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Controlled Double Blinded Trial [NCT02940405]38 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Ketorolac at Three Doses in Children With Acute Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05641363]Phase 3171 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-01Recruiting
Application of the ICE-T Postoperative Multimodal Pain Regimen to Laparoscopic Hysterectomy [NCT04137770]18 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-04Terminated(stopped due to lack of enrollment, change of OR policies due to COVID)
[NCT00595543]Phase 4166 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Comparison Of Intraperitoneal Instillation Of Magnesium Sulphate and Bupivacaine Versus Intravenous Analgesia In Laparoscopic Surgeries In Pediatrics [NCT04651556]Phase 466 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-04Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Pilot Study of Preoperative Anti-Inflammatory Therapy for Ureteral Stent Symptoms [NCT03638999]Early Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-31Recruiting
A Randomized Trial Comparing Auricular Acupuncture and Intravenous Migraine Medications in the Treatment of Status Migrainosus in the Pediatric Emergency Department [NCT02681211]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-02-29Recruiting
The Analgesic Efficacy of Continuous Infusion of Ketorolac and Ropivacaine at the Wound Site Using ON-Q Pump for Postoperative Pain Management [NCT00638508]Phase 467 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Single-dose and Multi-dose Open-label Pilot Trial of the Analgesic Efficacy and Tolerability of Intranasal Ketorolac Tromethamine (SPRIX®) in Dental Implant Surgery Patients With Postoperative Pain. [NCT01490931]Phase 428 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Can Intranasal Ketorolac Tromethamine Prescribed Postoperatively After Major Female Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery Reduce Consumption of Prescribed Narcotics? [NCT04444830]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study never opened to enrollment. Study never IRB approved.)
Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy To Non-Inferiority Comparison Of Ketorolac Tromethamine Versus Naproxen For Moderate to Severe Back Pain Treatment [NCT01471886]Phase 383 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Multimodal Narcotic Limited Perioperative Pain Control With Colorectal Surgery as Part of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol: A Randomized Prospective Single- Center Trial. [NCT02958566]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Pain-control Efficacy of Intra-articular Toradol Compared to Oral NSAIDs: A Pilot Study [NCT02966288]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to poor enrollment)
Aqueous Concentrations and PGE2 Inhibition of Ketorolac 0.4% vs. Bromfenac 0.09% in Cataract Patients [NCT00347503]Phase 40 participants InterventionalCompleted
[NCT00433225]Phase 40 participants InterventionalCompleted
"A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Trial Comparing 3 Doses of Intravenous Ketorolac for Pain Management in the Emergency Department" [NCT02078492]Phase 4240 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
A Masked Comparison of Acular LS Plus Steroid Versus Steroid Alone for the Prevention of Macular Leakage in Cataract Patients [NCT00348244]Phase 40 participants InterventionalCompleted
Intraoperative Lidocaine Infusion vs. Esmolol Infusion for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02327923]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Value of Intravenous Fluids in the Emergent Treatment of Pediatric Migraine [NCT06182098]134 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-27Recruiting
Evaluation of the Effects of Ketorolac 15mg IV Versus 30mg IV on Duration of Analgesia in Patients Who Present to the Emergency Department With Renal Colic [NCT05776953]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-21Recruiting
The Effect of Ketorolac on Posterior Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusions: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03278691]Phase 4600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-10-03Recruiting
A Phase 1, Open Label, Multiple Dose Study to Determine the Tolerability, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Ketorolac Tromethamine by Intranasal Administration in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01363050]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Evaluation of Post-operative Pain and Expression of IL-8 Using Ketolac or Cryo-irrigation as a Final Flush in Single Visit Endodontic Treatment in Teeth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis and Apical Periodontitis.Randomized Clinical Trial. [NCT04733326]Phase 139 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-01Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Post-operative Acetaminophen Versus Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Use on Lumbar Spinal Fusion Outcomes [NCT02700451]178 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Anti-inflammatory Therapy Following Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT): A Randomized, Masked, Placebo Controlled Study [NCT00485108]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Determining the Role of Periarticular Multimodal Analgesia in Decreasing Perioperative Pain in Tibial Plateau Fractures [NCT05037812]Early Phase 1150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-25Active, not recruiting
A Pilot Study Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy of IV Ibuprofen and IV Ketorolac [NCT01514175]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Enrolling by invitation
A Pilot Study to Determine the Efficacy of Intravenous Ibuprofen for Pain Control Following Arthroscopic Knee Surgery [NCT01650519]Phase 451 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
A Phase 2, Double-blind, Randomized Study of the Safety, Tolerability and Analgesic Efficacy of Multiple Doses of Ketorolac Tromethamine Administered Intranasally for Postoperative Pain [NCT01351090]Phase 2127 participants (Actual)InterventionalCompleted
A Randomized Double Blinded Study Comparing Use of Prochlorperazine Versus Prochlorperazine and Ketorolac in the Treatment of Pediatric Migraine in the Emergency Department [NCT01534806]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Drug is backordered;)
A Randomized, Masked Comparison of Topical Ketorolac 0,4% Versus Placebo in Cataract Surgery. [NCT01542190]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
MAST Trial: Multi-modal Analgesic Strategies in Trauma [NCT03472469]Phase 41,561 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-02Completed
The Effectiveness of Bupivicaine Infusion Versus Intravenous Ketorolac for Postoperative Analgesia After Iliac Crest Bone Harvesting for Lefort I Osteotomy or Alveolar Cleft Repair. [NCT00405262]Phase 354 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Ketorolac for Intravenous Regional Analgesia in Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Control Study [NCT05543785]76 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-01Recruiting
Sublingual Analgesia for Acute Abdominal Pain in Children. Ketorolac Versus Tramadol Versus Paracetamol, a Randomized, Control Trial [NCT02465255]Phase 3210 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
Nepafenac 0.1% Eye Drops, Suspension Compared to Ketorolac Trometamol 0.5% Eye Drops, Solution and Placebo (Nepafenac Vehicle) for the Prevention and Treatment of Ocular Inflammation and Ocular Pain Associated With Cataract Surgery: European Study [NCT00405730]Phase 3227 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
[NCT00407017]Phase 40 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Randomized Placebo-controlled Evaluation of GTPase Inhibition by Post-operative Intravenous Ketorolac in Ovarian Cancer Patients [NCT02470299]21 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-29Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Combination Therapy With Intravenous Ketorolac and Metoclopramide for Pediatric Migraine Therapy in the Emergency Department [NCT01596166]Phase 456 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Intravenous Ketorolac Vs. Morphine In Children Presenting With Suspected Appendicitis: A Pilot Single Center Non Inferiority Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT04528563]Phase 3105 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-05Completed
IIT2021-16-Hendifar-KetoROCX: A Feasibility Study of Ketorolac Treatment for Cachexia in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma [NCT05336266]Early Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-01Recruiting
Ketamine v. Ketorolac for Management of Generalized Tension Type Headache [NCT03221569]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-02-01Recruiting
Paracervical Block With Ketorolac and Lidocaine in First Trimester Surgical Abortions [NCT00617097]Phase 2/Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
[NCT00791323]Phase 49 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Nitrous Oxide for Pain Management During In-office Transcervical Sterilization [NCT02312739]72 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
Comparing Pain Outcomes of Intra-operative IV Tylenol and/or IV Toradol Administration for Carpal Tunnel Release and Distal Radius Fracture Surgeries [NCT02313675]Phase 444 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Evaluation of Paracetamol as Post-operative Analgetic Modality Compared With Ketorolac [NCT05523102]Phase 485 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-31Completed
A Pilot Study Evaluating Pain Outcomes of Ketorolac Administration in Children Undergoing Circumcision [NCT02973958]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-01Completed
Evaluating Post-operative Pain Management Efficacy of Intra Nasal Ketorolac in Ambulatory Urological Surgeries-A Randomized Double-blinded Placebo Controlled Study [NCT01736358]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Interim analysis showed futility of primary endpoint)
Does Single Injection Adductor Canal Block Improve Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Receiving Periarticular Local Anesthesia Injections for Total Knee Arthroplasty? [NCT02276495]55 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-26Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Intramuscular Ketorolac at Two Single-Dose Regimens for Treatment of Acute Musculoskeletal Pain in a Military Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial [NCT04763876]Phase 4110 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-27Completed
A Single Arm, Open Label Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of SPRIX (Intranasal Ketorolac Tromethamine) in 12 to 17 Year Old Patients vs. Adult Patients (18-64 Years) Undergoing Open Surgical Procedures [NCT01819610]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Topical Application of ACULAR a Randomized, Vehicle Controlled Clinical Trial: Efficiency in Inhibiting Proliferative Retinopathy of Prematurity [NCT00634972]Phase 483 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Terminated(stopped due to The study could not be completed as the company producing this product interrupted their supply of this medication)
Intravenous Ibuprofen Versus Ketorolac for Perioperative Pain Control After Open Hysterectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05610384]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-11-20Completed
Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block vs. Pericapsular Nerve Group Block vs. Local Anesthetic Infiltration vs. Spinal Anesthetic Without Adjuncts for Pain Control Following Total Hip Arthroplasty [NCT05062356]Phase 1240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-04Recruiting
Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerves Block Through Perichondrial Approach: a New Strategy With a Wide Range of Utilization in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgeries. [NCT06039423]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-07-02Completed
Postoperative Analgesia After Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Comparison of Continuous Epidural Infusion and Wound Infiltration With Intraarticular Bolus Injection. [NCT00289419]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
A Randomized, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, Single-Dose Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Lornoxicam (8 mg and 16 mg) Compared to Intravenous Placebo and Ketorolac 30 mg in Management of Acute Postoperative Pain Following Orthopedic [NCT00293631]Phase 2100 participants Interventional2005-11-30Completed
A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Analgesic Efficacy of Multiple Doses of Ketorolac Tromethamine Administered Intranasally for Postoperative Pain Following Major Abdominal Surgery [NCT00266786]Phase 3321 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Comparison of Topical Nepafenac to Placebo in Corneal Epithelial Healing Times and Postoperative Pain Relief of Patients Status Post-Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Double-Masked Randomized Prospective Study [NCT00330798]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Effect of Prophylactic NSAID Drops on Cystoid Macular Edema After Cataract Surgery Using Optical Coherence Tomography [NCT00335439]98 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Acular LS vs. Nevanac in Post op Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery [NCT00348582]Phase 40 participants InterventionalCompleted
KITS Study -Ketorolac In Tonsillectomy Surgery: a Double Blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT01498796]Phase 2121 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Terminated(stopped due to PI no longer at institution)
Continuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Patients [NCT04040452]Phase 4166 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-01Recruiting
Psoas Compartment Block Versus Periarticular Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Pain Management for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Study [NCT02658149]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
Efficacy of Intraoperative Injections on Postoperative Pain Control During Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Controlled Study [NCT03119038]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Investigator no longer actively pursuing this study.)
Intravenous Ibuprofen Versus Ketorolac for Perioperative Pain Control in Morbid Obese Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05801900]116 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-30Not yet recruiting
"NSAIDs vs. Opiates: Which is More Effective in Managing Pain in Mild to Moderate Acute Pancreatitis? A Randomized Controlled Trial" [NCT05756504]Early Phase 1130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-22Recruiting
The Efficacy of Continuous Intravenous Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a Double Blinded Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT00765128]Phase 417 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Open Label Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics of Intranasal Ketorolac Tromethamine Following Multiple Doses of Fluticasone Propionate in Healthy Subjects [NCT01365611]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Rectus Sheath Block for Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery [NCT02476799]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
A Study of the Pharmacokinetics of Ketorolac Tromethamine Administered Intranasally (IN) for Postoperative Pain in Children Aged 12 Through 17 Years [NCT01363076]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
[NCT01761071]Phase 394 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Improving Pain Management and Long Term Outcomes Following High Energy Orthopedic Trauma (Pain Study) [NCT01789216]Phase 3450 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Artificial Tears Versus Preservative Free Ketorolac Trometamol 0.45% for Treatment of Acute Viral Conjunctivitis [NCT01799863]Phase 2/Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Protein Profile of Immunoregulatory Factors in Diabetic Cataract [NCT01832311]Phase 461 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Comparison of a Pain Pump Versus Injectable Medication for Analgesia in Knee Arthroscopy [NCT01242644]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
A Phase 1, Double-blind, 4-way Crossover Study of the Tolerability, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of 4 Formulations of Ketorolac Tromethamine by Intranasal Administration in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01355588]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Open Label, Three-Way Study to Assess the Absorption and Tolerability of Intranasal Ketorolac Tromethamine and to Assess the Effects of a Single Dose of Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride and Multiple Doses of Fluticasone Propionate on the Absorption and Tolerab [NCT01365650]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
Intramuscular Ketorolac Versus Oral Ibuprofen for Pain Relief in First Trimester Suction Curettage: a Randomized Clinical Trial. [NCT01595282]94 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Continuous Posterior Lumbar Plexus Nerve Block vs Periarticular Injection With Ropivacaine or Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel®) on Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty [NCT02242201]Phase 4165 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Preeclampsia And Nonsteroidal Drugs for Analgesia (PANDA): a Randomized Non Inferiority Trial [NCT03978767]Phase 2286 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-10Recruiting
The Impact of the Continuous Infusion of Intraperitoneal Analgesics on Postoperative Pain After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04130464]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-30Recruiting
NSAID Use After Robotic Partial Nephrectomy (No-PAIN): a Randomized, Controlled Trial [NCT05842044]Phase 2110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-15Recruiting
A Pilot Trial to Study the Availability and Effect of Post-OP IV Ketorolac on Ovarian, Fallopian Tube or Primary Peritoneal Cancer, Cells Retrieved From the Peritoneal Cavity [NCT01670799]Early Phase 129 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Efficacy of Pethidine, Ketorolac And Xylocaine Gel As Analgesics For Pain Control In Shockwave Lithotripsy Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03032458]Phase 4165 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Completed
A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Subacromial Injection With Corticosteroid Versus NSAID in Patients With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome [NCT01449448]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to PI didn't have time to finish approval process)
Impact of IV Acetaminophen on Post-operative Pain After Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Perforated Appendicitis: A Prospective Randomized Trial [NCT02881996]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Low Dose Ketamine Infusion for Comorbid Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Chronic Pain Patients [NCT04322968]Phase 341 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-09Completed
Multimodal Pain Management for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Control Trial [NCT02922985]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Completed
Ketorolac in Postoperative Infants: Pharmacokinetics and Safety [NCT01260883]Phase 377 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-05-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase II/III Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed Combination of Ketorolac / Pitofenone / Fenpiverinium Compared to Active Control in Patients With Pain After Surgical Abdominal and Pelvic Ope [NCT05607641]Phase 2/Phase 3424 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-07-07Completed
A Phase 1, Open-label Pharmacokinetic Study of Intravenous NTM-001 (A Novel Formulation of Ketorolac Tromethamine Applied by Continuous Intravenous Infusion From A Pre-Mixed Bag) in Healthy Chinese Subjects [NCT05382546]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-05-23Completed
Perioperative Pain Management for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Pilot Non-Inferiority Trial [NCT05908851]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-01Not yet recruiting
A Double-Masked, Randomized, Single-Center Study Evaluating the Effect of 0.30% Ketorolac/0.80% HPMC, 0.80% HPMC and Vehicle on Symptoms of Dry Eye After Exposure to the Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE) [NCT03693183]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated by Sponsor)
Traditional vs. Nonopioid Analgesia After Labral Surgery [NCT03825809]Phase 2/Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-22Recruiting
Local Infiltration Analgesia for Total Knee Arthroplasty: Should Ketorolac be Added [NCT00868348]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Pain Control for Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized, Double Blind Control Trial of Ketorolac Prior to Intrauterine Device Placement. [NCT01664559]67 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Dosing of Ketorolac for Four Classes of Complaints in the Emergency Department [NCT03464461]Phase 4500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-01Active, not recruiting
Prospective Randomized Study Evaluating the Effect of Postoperative Ketorolac on Bone Healing and Opioid Consumption After First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion [NCT04872283]Phase 3140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-23Enrolling by invitation
A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Two Periarticular Multimodal Drug Injections in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty [NCT02543801]Phase 4239 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-25Completed
Intra-arterial Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for Patients With Refractory Headache [NCT04353505]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to PI closed the study before any enrollment)
A Randomized Study of the Effects of Perioperative i.v. Ketorolac-lidocaine on the Hemodynamic Response in the Patients With Valvular Heart Diseases During Cesarean Delivery [NCT01571791]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-06-30Suspended(stopped due to No enough recruited cases)
Ketorolac as an Adjuvant Agent for Postoperative Pain Control Following Arthroscopic ACL Surgery [NCT04246554]Phase 349 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-21Completed
Intrathecal Ketorolac in Patients With Intrathecal Morphine Dose Escalation [NCT00349401]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study was not initiated. No subjects were screened or enrolled.)
Postoperative Pain Alleviation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery; Presternal Bupivacaine and Magnesium Infiltration Versus Conventional Intravenous Analgesia [NCT03106818]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
Post-Op Pain Control for Prophylactic Intramedullary Nailing. [NCT03823534]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-20Recruiting
Effectiveness of Oral Premedication on the Success Rate of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05097768]250 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-15Completed
Opioid-Free Pain Control Regiment Following Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04939987]Phase 2/Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to PI left institution and study was not transferred to new PI)
The Effect of Prophylactic Ketorolac on Sore Throat After Thyroid Surgery [NCT02039427]192 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Does Ketorolac Delay Bone Healing and Improve Post-operative Pain?: A Prospective Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT01133639]18 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Terminated(stopped due to PI no longer with the institution, funding issues, poor accrual)
Relieving Acute Pain (RAP): A Pilot Study [NCT03426137]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-17Terminated(stopped due to The focus of the project has shifted to publishing a protocol for future trials because we were unable to recruit. Three participants signed the consent forms but withdrew before the randomization.)
Pain Treatment After Joint Surgery With a Combination of Aspirin, Ketorolac, and Celecoxib. [NCT05994287]105 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-01Completed
Phase I Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of the Ophthalmic Solution PRO-156 Over the Ocular Surface of Ophthalmologically Healthy Volunteers. [NCT01871077]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Human Cerebral Blood Flow Regulation: Sex, Mechanism, and Stress Differences [NCT04265053]Early Phase 1144 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-12Recruiting
Prospective Comparison of Epinephrine and Phenylephrine/Ketorolac (Omidria®) Additives With Regards to Intraoperative Pupil Size [NCT02895035]Phase 459 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-01Terminated(stopped due to Data analysis was never performed by sub-investigator)
Synergistic Pharmacologic Intervention for Prevention of ROP (SPIPROP STUDY) [NCT02344225]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-01Completed
NSAID Injection Versus Corticosteroid Injection for Basilar Thumb Arthritis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial [NCT05992883]Phase 3240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-28Recruiting
Initial Pain Management in Pediatric Pancreatitis: Opioid vs. Non-Opioid [NCT04291599]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-15Recruiting
Narcotic-Free Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy [NCT05924165]Phase 490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-19Recruiting
Low Dose Versus Normal Dose Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain After Prostatectomy and Hysterectomy: a Double-blind Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial [NCT05206110]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-21Recruiting
Use of Perioperative Ketorolac in Breast Surgery to Reduce Post Operative Pain and Opioid Use [NCT04439396]Phase 1183 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-22Completed
Oral Ketorolac for Pain Relief During IUD Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03031795]Phase 471 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Enhanced Recovery at Cesarean Birth to Improve Postoperative Outcomes and Reduce Postoperative Length of Stay [NCT02956616]Phase 2118 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-01Completed
[NCT00377546]Phase 40 participants InterventionalCompleted
Evaluating Pain Outcomes of Caudal vs Ilioinguinal Nerve Block in Children Undergoing Orchiopexy Repair [NCT03041935]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-01Completed
The Effect of Saphenous Nerve and Obturator Nerve Block Combined With Systemic High Dose Glucocorticoid Versus Local Infiltration Analgesia Combined With a Systemic High Dose Glucocorticoid on Opioid Consumption and Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty [NCT02374008]Phase 474 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketorolac/ Midazolam on Perioperative Outcome During Retinal Surgery. [NCT03143244]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-01Completed
IV Valproate for Acute Migraine. A Randomized Comparison Versus IV Metoclopramide and IV Ketorolac [NCT01267864]Phase 4330 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
Continuous Infusion Versus Bolus Dosing for Pain Control After Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery [NCT02112448]78 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Multimodal Postoperative Analgesia Using Accufuser for Multilevel Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) [NCT04483427]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-20Recruiting
Pharmacokinetics of Anesthetics and Analgesics in Children and Adolescent [NCT03427736]460 participants (Anticipated)Observational2018-12-13Recruiting
Topical Lidocaine Gel With and Without Subconjunctival Lidocaine Injection for Intravitreal Injection: a Within-patient Study [NCT01640171]57 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Gonyautoxins Local Periarticular Injection for Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double Blind Randomized Study [NCT03025594]Phase 364 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Recruiting
A Double-blinded, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Dexamethasone Versus Ketorolac Injection for the Treatment of Local Inflammatory Hand and Upper Extremity Disorders [NCT02266433]Phase 3245 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Terminated(stopped due to due to PI's change to private practice)
Multimodal Opioid-free Anesthesia Versus Opioid-based Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Valve Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04648540]Early Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-01Completed
A Randomized Prospective Double Masked Controlled Trial Comparing Ketorolac Tromethamine 0.4% and Prednisolone Acetate 1% in Reducing Post-selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Anterior Chamber Flare and Cells. [NCT00478036]31 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Terminated(stopped due to insufficient enrollment)
INflammatory MediatorS in the PathophysIology of Diabetic REtinopathy (INSPIRE) Study [NCT04505566]Phase 1264 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-09Recruiting
Effect of Intrathecal Ketorolac on Mechanical Hypersensitivity Following Acute Opioid Exposure [NCT00693160]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Terminated(stopped due to the manufacturing of preservative free ketorolac (Acular-PF) was discontinued)
The Efficacy of Continuous Intravenous Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: a Double Blinded Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial. [NCT00765232]Phase 4111 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Do Intraoperative Periarticular Injections Improve Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Receiving Duramorph (Preservative Free) During Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02570503]Phase 464 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Study's primary aims are no longer clinically impactful, as intrathecal morphine has fallen out of favor and replaced with different agents so that outpatient/23 hr surgery is more predictably achievable.)
A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Determine the Efficacy of Intravenous Ibuprofen Compared to Intravenous Ketorolac for Pain Control Following Arthroscopic Knee Surgery [NCT01901393]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Effects of Pre-emptive Scalp Infiltration With Low-dose Ketorolac and Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain Relief After Elective Supratentorial Craniotomy (PAINLESS): a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial [NCT04380298]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-01Not yet recruiting
[NCT01836406]16 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
A Prospective Evaluation of an Anesthesia Protocol to Reduce Post-operative and Post-discharge Nausea and Vomiting in a High Risk Orthognathic Surgery Population [NCT01592708]233 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Increased Ketorolac Administration After Cesarean Section and Its Effect on Opioid Use: a Randomized Control Trial [NCT03678675]Phase 3148 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-30Completed
A Comparison of Post Phacoemulsification Aqueous Flare in Patients Using Ketorolac 0.45% BID and Bromfenac 0.09% BID [NCT01023724]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
A Comparison of Peak Aqueous Penetration of Acuvail, Xibrom, and Nevanac in Patients Undergoing Phacoemulsification [NCT01001806]Phase 4126 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Trial of the Efficacy of a Bilateral Lumbar Erector Spinae Block on the 24h Morphine Consumption After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery. [NCT03825198]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-01Recruiting
Contributions of Nitric Oxide Synthase, Cyclooxygenase, and Reactive Oxygen Species to Regional Cerebrovascular Control During Hypoxia and Hypercapnia [NCT03066115]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-01Withdrawn(stopped due to This study was never funded, never fully IRB approved, and thus never enrolled anyone.)
Pain Outcomes of Non-opioid Analgesia After Ureteroscopy or Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Nephrolithiasis: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT03584373]Phase 3119 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-27Completed
Efficacy of a Peri-Operative Surgical-Site, Multimodal Drug Injection in Pediatric Patients With Cerebral Palsy Undergoing Hip Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04074265]Phase 434 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-01Completed
A Prospective, Open-label, Nonrandomized Efficacy and Safety Trial of Intranasal Ketorolac in Emergency Department Patients for the Treatment of Acute Pain [NCT01471639]37 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
[NCT00521456]Phase 3263 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
[NCT00524264]Phase 3248 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Ketorolac for Analgesia followiNG Autologous Breast RecOnstructiOn [NCT03007381]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to No funding.)
Effect of Intrathecal Ketorolac on Mechanical Hypersensitivity After Total Hip Arthroplasty [NCT00621530]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to discontinuation of Acular PF (investigational medication))
A Brain Imaging Study of Opioid (Morphine) and Non-opioid (Ketorolac) Conditioning Effects [NCT01576276]51 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
A Randomized Double-blinded Study to Evaluate Preincisional Dextromethorphan in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Postoperative Opioid Use [NCT02987920]Phase 423 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Terminated(stopped due to The surgeon changed pain control protocol for all patients. Continued enrollment impossible under approved protocol.)
The Efficiency of Periarticular Multimodal Drug Injection in Pain Management Following Primary Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT06112548]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-01Not yet recruiting
The ESCRS EPICAT Study: Effectiveness of Periocular Drug Injection in CATaract Surgery [NCT05158699]Phase 3808 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-13Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Study of Ketorolac Use in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Tonsillectomy [NCT03453541]Phase 4600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-21Recruiting
A Comparison of NSAIDs for Acute, Non-radicular Low Back Pain. A Randomized Trial [NCT03861611]Phase 4198 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-12Completed
Wound Infiltration With Ketorolac Versus Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study. [NCT03394001]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-01Active, not recruiting
Magnesium Sulfate Improves Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgeries: a Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT02508857]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Comparison of Ketorolac Nasal Spray to Sumatriptan Nasal Spray and Placebo for Acute Treatment of Migraine (The KSPN Migraine Study) [NCT01807234]Phase 472 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00115336 (9) [back to overview]Dyspepsia
NCT00115336 (9) [back to overview]Total Parenteral Opioid Usage
NCT00115336 (9) [back to overview]Time to a 50% Reduction in Reported Pain Intensity
NCT00115336 (9) [back to overview]Occurrence of Azotemia
NCT00115336 (9) [back to overview]Hematuria
NCT00115336 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Hospitalization
NCT00115336 (9) [back to overview]Bleeding
NCT00115336 (9) [back to overview]Gastrointestinal Ulceration
NCT00115336 (9) [back to overview]Fluid Retention
NCT00478036 (1) [back to overview]Interocular Pressure
NCT00483717 (8) [back to overview]The Number of Treated Subjects Who Became Pain-free (IHS Grade 0) by Observation Time Point
NCT00483717 (8) [back to overview]The Number of Treated Subjects Who Became Pain-free (International Headache Society Grade of 0 = no Pain) by Observation Time Point.
NCT00483717 (8) [back to overview]The Number of Treated Subjects Who Became Pain-free (IHS Grade 0) by Observation Time Point
NCT00483717 (8) [back to overview]The Number of Treated Subjects Who Became Pain-free (IHS Grade 0) by Observation Time Point
NCT00483717 (8) [back to overview]The Number of Treated Subjects Who Became Pain-free (IHS Grade 0) by Observation Time Point
NCT00483717 (8) [back to overview]The Number of Treated Subjects Who Became Pain-free (IHS Grade 0) by Observation Time Point
NCT00483717 (8) [back to overview]The Number of Treated Subjects Who Became Pain-free (IHS Grade 0) by Observation Time Point
NCT00483717 (8) [back to overview]The Number of Treated Subjects Who Became Pain-free (IHS Grade 0) by Observation Time Point
NCT00507026 (16) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Differences (PID) Over Time
NCT00507026 (16) [back to overview]Sum of the Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Over 120 Hours
NCT00507026 (16) [back to overview]Sum of the Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Over 24 Hours
NCT00507026 (16) [back to overview]Sum of the Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Over 48 Hours
NCT00507026 (16) [back to overview]Sum of the Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Over 72 Hours
NCT00507026 (16) [back to overview]Sum of the Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Over 96 Hours
NCT00507026 (16) [back to overview]Time From Administration of Study Drug to Administration of Rescue Medication
NCT00507026 (16) [back to overview]Time to Meaningful Relief
NCT00507026 (16) [back to overview]Time to Perceptible Relief
NCT00507026 (16) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Differences (PID) Over Time
NCT00507026 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants According to Frequency of Use of Rescue Medication
NCT00507026 (16) [back to overview]Cumulative Amount of Rescue Medication
NCT00507026 (16) [back to overview]Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR)
NCT00507026 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Attaining Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30 Percent (%) Reduction From Baseline in Pain Intensity
NCT00507026 (16) [back to overview]Participant Global Evaluation Over Time
NCT00507026 (16) [back to overview]Visual Analog Pain Relief Values Over the Time
NCT00521456 (4) [back to overview]Mean Pupil Area
NCT00521456 (4) [back to overview]Resolution of Post Operative Inflammation
NCT00521456 (4) [back to overview]Visual Acuity
NCT00521456 (4) [back to overview]Ocular Pain
NCT00524264 (4) [back to overview]Resolution of Post Operative Inflammation
NCT00524264 (4) [back to overview]Ocular Pain
NCT00524264 (4) [back to overview]Mean Pupil Area
NCT00524264 (4) [back to overview]Visual Acuity
NCT00562627 (3) [back to overview]Opioid Use
NCT00562627 (3) [back to overview]Pain at Rest (VAS)
NCT00562627 (3) [back to overview]Time to Readiness for Discharge
NCT00617097 (4) [back to overview]Level of Pain During Specific Time Intervals Throughout D&C Procedure.
NCT00617097 (4) [back to overview]Visual Analogue Scale Regarding Satisfaction Level
NCT00617097 (4) [back to overview]Reported Symptoms
NCT00617097 (4) [back to overview]Complications
NCT00621530 (5) [back to overview]Present Pain Intensity
NCT00621530 (5) [back to overview]Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory
NCT00621530 (5) [back to overview]McGill Pain Intensity
NCT00621530 (5) [back to overview]McGill Affective Pain
NCT00621530 (5) [back to overview]Area of Hypersensitivity to Mechanical Stimuli Surrounding the Wound 48 Hours After Surgery
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]PATIENT SATISFACTION
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]NAUSEA
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]NAUSEA
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]Morphine Equivalents Utilization
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]Morphine Equivalents
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]Morphine Equivalents
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]DROWSINESS
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]DROWSINESS
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]PATIENT SATISFACTION
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]Pain Scores on Movement
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]Pain Scores on Coughing
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]Pain Scores on Coughing
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]Pain Scores at Rest
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]Pain Scores at Rest
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]Pain Score on Coughing
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]Pain Score at Rest
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]Pain on Movement
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]Pain on Movement
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]VOMITING
NCT00638508 (20) [back to overview]VOMITING
NCT00693160 (2) [back to overview]Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) Concentration
NCT00693160 (2) [back to overview]Hyperalgesia
NCT00765128 (2) [back to overview]Pain 'Right Now'
NCT00765128 (2) [back to overview]Morphine Equivalents of Concomitant Pain Medication
NCT00765232 (2) [back to overview]Pain 'Right Now'
NCT00765232 (2) [back to overview]Morphine Equivalents of Concomitant Pain Medication
NCT00791323 (1) [back to overview]Mean Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) Aqueous Humor Levels
NCT00868348 (6) [back to overview]Time to First i.v. Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) Morphine Request
NCT00868348 (6) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Scores During Walking
NCT00868348 (6) [back to overview]Pain Intensity During Daily Activity
NCT00868348 (6) [back to overview]Morphine Consumption
NCT00868348 (6) [back to overview]Length of Hospital Stay
NCT00868348 (6) [back to overview]Home Readiness
NCT00901628 (6) [back to overview]Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia(PCA) Consumption During 24 Hours After Surgery
NCT00901628 (6) [back to overview]Maximal Flexion Angle Degree on Postoperative 7 Day
NCT00901628 (6) [back to overview]Pain( Visual Analog Scale )
NCT00901628 (6) [back to overview]Participant Number of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting During 24 Hours After Surgery
NCT00901628 (6) [back to overview]the Proportion of Patients Who Were Satisfied With the Pain Management
NCT00901628 (6) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients Who Could Raise Leg With Replaced Knee Extended
NCT00981435 (2) [back to overview]Intraocular Inflammation
NCT00981435 (2) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Change
NCT01001806 (1) [back to overview]Peak Aqueous Penetration
NCT01011673 (2) [back to overview]Change in Pain Score
NCT01011673 (2) [back to overview]Satisfaction Scores
NCT01021761 (1) [back to overview]Aqueous PGE2 Inhibition
NCT01023724 (1) [back to overview]Anterior Chamber Inflammation (Flare)
NCT01242644 (8) [back to overview]Number of Narcotic Pills and Morphine Sulfate Used
NCT01242644 (8) [back to overview]Pain Scale
NCT01242644 (8) [back to overview]Number of Narcotic Pills and Morphine Sulfate Used
NCT01242644 (8) [back to overview]Number of Narcotic Pills and Morphine Sulfate Used
NCT01242644 (8) [back to overview]Number of Narcotic Pills and Morphine Sulfate Used
NCT01242644 (8) [back to overview]Pain Scale
NCT01242644 (8) [back to overview]Pain Scale
NCT01242644 (8) [back to overview]Pain Score 8 Hours Post-operativley
NCT01260883 (12) [back to overview]Peripheral Volume of Distribution for S- and R+ Ketorolac in 2-6 Month Old Infants
NCT01260883 (12) [back to overview]Percent Time With Room Air Oximetry Saturations Under 90% in 2-6 Month Infants
NCT01260883 (12) [back to overview]Morphine Use in 2-6 Month Old Infants Given Ketorolac or Placebo Following Surgery
NCT01260883 (12) [back to overview]Ketorolac Stereo-isomer Volume of Distribution Peripheral in 6-18 Month Old Infants
NCT01260883 (12) [back to overview]Half-life of S- and R+ Ketorolac in 2-6 Month Old Infants
NCT01260883 (12) [back to overview]Half-life of Ketorolac Stereo-isomers in 6-18 Month Old Infants After Surgery
NCT01260883 (12) [back to overview]Clearance of S-ketorolac and R+ Ketorolac in 2-6 Month Old Infants Following Surgery
NCT01260883 (12) [back to overview]Clearance of S- and R+ Ketorolac in 6-18 Month Old Infants
NCT01260883 (12) [back to overview]Central Volume of Distribution for S- and R+ Ketorolac in 2-6 Month Old Infants
NCT01260883 (12) [back to overview]Oximetry Saturation Under 90% After Ketorolac or Placebo Infusion in 6-18 Month Old Infants
NCT01260883 (12) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution for Ketorolac Isomers in 6-18 Month Old Infants
NCT01260883 (12) [back to overview]Total Morphine Use in 6-18 Month Old Infants After Ketorolac or Placebo Intravenous Infusion After Surgery
NCT01267864 (4) [back to overview]Adverse Event
NCT01267864 (4) [back to overview]Satisfaction With Medication
NCT01267864 (4) [back to overview]Headache Pain Level on a 0-10 Verbal Scale
NCT01267864 (4) [back to overview]Participants Who Achieve Sustained Headache Freedom for 24 Hours
NCT01345162 (1) [back to overview]Analgesic Efficacy
NCT01351090 (4) [back to overview]Total MS Use in Milligrams by PCA From 24 Hours After the Start of Dosing Through 48 Hours
NCT01351090 (4) [back to overview]Total MS Use in Milligrams by PCA From the Start of Dosing Through 48 Hours
NCT01351090 (4) [back to overview]Total Morphine Sulfate (MS) Use in Milligrams by Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) Through 24 Hours
NCT01351090 (4) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Scores
NCT01355588 (4) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC 0-∞)
NCT01355588 (4) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)
NCT01355588 (4) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
NCT01355588 (4) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Post-dose (AUC 0-t)
NCT01363050 (9) [back to overview]Tmin,ss (the Time to Minimum Concentration at Steady State)
NCT01363050 (9) [back to overview]Tmax,ss (the Time to Maximum Concentration at Steady State)
NCT01363050 (9) [back to overview]Tmax (the Time to Maximum Concentration)
NCT01363050 (9) [back to overview]MRT (the Mean Residence Time
NCT01363050 (9) [back to overview]Cmin,ss (the Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration at Steady State)
NCT01363050 (9) [back to overview]Cmax,ss (the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration at Steady State)
NCT01363050 (9) [back to overview]Cmax (the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration)
NCT01363050 (9) [back to overview]AUCτ (the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval at Steady-state)
NCT01363050 (9) [back to overview]AUC 0-8h (the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 8 Hours Post-dose)
NCT01363076 (7) [back to overview]AUC 0-24 (the AUC From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose
NCT01363076 (7) [back to overview]AUCinf (the AUC Time From Zero to Infinity, Where Possible)
NCT01363076 (7) [back to overview]AUClast (the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Timepoint Post-dose)
NCT01363076 (7) [back to overview]MRT (Mean Residence Time)
NCT01363076 (7) [back to overview]Cmax (the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration)
NCT01363076 (7) [back to overview]Tmax (The Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration; ie. The Time at Which Cmax Occured)
NCT01363076 (7) [back to overview]t1/2 (the Terminal Half-life, Where Possible)
NCT01365611 (6) [back to overview]MRT (the Mean Residence Time of Ketorolac Tromethamine, Where Possible)
NCT01365611 (6) [back to overview]t1/2z (the Terminal Half-life of Ketorolac Tromethamine, Where Possible)
NCT01365611 (6) [back to overview]Tmax (the Time to Maximum Concentration of Ketorolac Tromethamine)
NCT01365611 (6) [back to overview]AUC 0-t (the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Time Point Post-dose of Ketorolac Tromethamine).
NCT01365611 (6) [back to overview]AUC Inf (the AUC From Time Zero to Infinity, Where Possible)
NCT01365611 (6) [back to overview]Cmax (the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Ketorolac Tromethamine)
NCT01365624 (6) [back to overview]t1/2z (Terminal Half-life)
NCT01365624 (6) [back to overview]Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration)
NCT01365624 (6) [back to overview]Tmax (Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration)
NCT01365624 (6) [back to overview]AUC (Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Infinity
NCT01365624 (6) [back to overview]MRT (Mean Residence Time)
NCT01365624 (6) [back to overview]AUClast (Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Time Point Post-dose
NCT01365650 (6) [back to overview]t1/2z (the Terminal Half-life, Where Possible)
NCT01365650 (6) [back to overview]Tmax (the Time to Maximum Concentration)
NCT01365650 (6) [back to overview]AUC 0-∞ (the AUC From Time Zero to Infinity, Where Possible)
NCT01365650 (6) [back to overview]AUC 0-t (the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Time Point Post-dose)
NCT01365650 (6) [back to overview]Cmax (the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration)
NCT01365650 (6) [back to overview]MRT (the Mean Residence Time)
NCT01471639 (1) [back to overview]Efficacy of Intranasal Ketorolac on Numeric Pain Scale
NCT01490931 (13) [back to overview]Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 3 Hours With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period
NCT01490931 (13) [back to overview]Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 5 Hours With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period
NCT01490931 (13) [back to overview]Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 6 Hours With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period
NCT01490931 (13) [back to overview]Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 90 Minutes With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period
NCT01490931 (13) [back to overview]Median Onset of Meaningful Pain Relief
NCT01490931 (13) [back to overview]Most Frequent Number of Days of Analgesic Dosing in Dental Implant Surgery Patients When Employing Intranasal Ketorolac as Their Pain Medication.
NCT01490931 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Who Reach a Level of at Least Moderate Pain by Achieving a Score of at Least 40 mm on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale Within 5 Hours After the Completion of Surgery.
NCT01490931 (13) [back to overview]The Median Onset of First Perceptible Pain Relief of Intranasal Ketorolac in Dental Implant Surgery Patients
NCT01490931 (13) [back to overview]Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 2 Hours With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period
NCT01490931 (13) [back to overview]Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 20 Minutes With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period.
NCT01490931 (13) [back to overview]Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 60 Minutes With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period
NCT01490931 (13) [back to overview]Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 4 Hours With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period
NCT01490931 (13) [back to overview]Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 40 Minutes With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period.
NCT01576276 (2) [back to overview]Pain Ratings
NCT01576276 (2) [back to overview]fMRI Signal Changes
NCT01592708 (5) [back to overview]Post-operative Nausea
NCT01592708 (5) [back to overview]Post-operative Vomiting
NCT01592708 (5) [back to overview]Post-discharge Vomiting
NCT01592708 (5) [back to overview]Post-discharge Nausea
NCT01592708 (5) [back to overview]Hospital Length of Stay
NCT01595282 (3) [back to overview]Pain Scores Immediately After Cervical Dilation
NCT01595282 (3) [back to overview]Pain Scores 15 Minutes Post-procedure
NCT01595282 (3) [back to overview]Immediate Post-procedure Pain Score
NCT01640171 (3) [back to overview]Likert Like Pain Scale Number of Participants Who Said the Topical Eye Hurt Much More Than the Subconjunctival Eye at Time of Intravitreal Injection
NCT01640171 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Preferred Subconjunctival Anesthetic at the Third Follow-up Visit
NCT01640171 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participatns With Level 10 Pain on Wong-Baker Pain Scale In Subconjunctival Eye At Time of Intravitreal Injection
NCT01650519 (7) [back to overview]Measurement of the Efficacy of IV Ibuprofen for the Treatment of Postoperative Pain as Measured by the Amount of Rescue Medication in the Postoperative Period Through Discharge
NCT01650519 (7) [back to overview]Measurement of the Efficacy of IV Ibuprofen for the Treatment of Postoperative Pain as Measured by the Amount of Time to Rescue Medication in the Postoperative Period Through Discharge
NCT01650519 (7) [back to overview]Efficacy of IV Ibuprofen for Post-op Pain.
NCT01650519 (7) [back to overview]Measurement of the Efficacy of IV Ibuprofen for the Treatment of Postoperative Pain as Measured by the Pain Intensity as Assess by Patient Pain Intensity (VAS) in the Post-surgical Period, Through 24 Hours
NCT01650519 (7) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction.
NCT01650519 (7) [back to overview]Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).
NCT01650519 (7) [back to overview]Time to Discharge.
NCT01664559 (5) [back to overview]Nulliparous Patients - Subgroup Analysis
NCT01664559 (5) [back to overview]Pain Scores at Other Time Points During and After IUD Placement
NCT01664559 (5) [back to overview]VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Measurement of Pain
NCT01664559 (5) [back to overview]Post-insertion Patient Questionnaire
NCT01664559 (5) [back to overview]Post-insertion Provider Questionnaire
NCT01736358 (5) [back to overview]Post-operative Opioid Requirements
NCT01736358 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Postoperative Side Effects
NCT01736358 (5) [back to overview]Post Operative Pain Scale
NCT01736358 (5) [back to overview]Post Operative Pain Score
NCT01736358 (5) [back to overview]Post Operative Pain Score
NCT01806259 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01806259 (2) [back to overview]Recurrence-free Survival
NCT01807234 (10) [back to overview]Time to Pain Relief
NCT01807234 (10) [back to overview]Absence of Nausea
NCT01807234 (10) [back to overview]2- Hour Pain Relief
NCT01807234 (10) [back to overview]Absence of Allodynia
NCT01807234 (10) [back to overview]Absence of Phonophobia
NCT01807234 (10) [back to overview]Absence of Photophobia
NCT01807234 (10) [back to overview]Pain Freedom
NCT01807234 (10) [back to overview]Self-assessment of Disability: Percentage of Participants With Moderate or Severe Disability
NCT01807234 (10) [back to overview]Sustained Pain Freedom (SPF)
NCT01807234 (10) [back to overview]Sustained Pain Relief (SPR)
NCT01871077 (4) [back to overview]Number of Eyes With Epithelial Defects
NCT01871077 (4) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT01871077 (4) [back to overview]Visual Acuity (VA)
NCT01871077 (4) [back to overview]Number of Cases With Adverse Events
NCT01901393 (6) [back to overview]Time to First Use of Rescue Med Will be Measured
NCT01901393 (6) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction
NCT01901393 (6) [back to overview]Rescue Medication Use in Post-operative Period
NCT01901393 (6) [back to overview]Efficacy of Pain Relief (Pain Intensity at Rest)
NCT01901393 (6) [back to overview]Efficacy of Pain Relief (Pain Intensity With Movement)
NCT01901393 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Serious Adverse Events
NCT02039427 (3) [back to overview]The Incidence of Postoperative Sore Throat(POST) Using Ketorolac and Dexamethasone in Womend After Thyroidectomy
NCT02039427 (3) [back to overview]Potential Side Effects Associated With the Study Drugs
NCT02039427 (3) [back to overview]The Incidence of Postoperative Hoarseness(PH) Using Ketorolac and Dexamethasone in Womend After Thyroidectomy
NCT02078492 (4) [back to overview]Adverse Effect of Nausea
NCT02078492 (4) [back to overview]Adverse Effect of Headache
NCT02078492 (4) [back to overview]Adverse Effect of Dizziness
NCT02078492 (4) [back to overview]Pain Score at 30 Minutes
NCT02112448 (2) [back to overview]Total Morphine Dosage
NCT02112448 (2) [back to overview]Length of Stay
NCT02181426 (1) [back to overview]PACU Opiate Consumption
NCT02242201 (9) [back to overview]Post-Operative Pain Score
NCT02242201 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting Complications Since Surgery
NCT02242201 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting a NRS Pain Score Greater Than 3
NCT02242201 (9) [back to overview]Total Opioid Consumption During Hospitalization
NCT02242201 (9) [back to overview]Change in Unipedal Stance Time
NCT02242201 (9) [back to overview]Maximum Postoperative Pain Score
NCT02242201 (9) [back to overview]Hospital Length of Stay
NCT02242201 (9) [back to overview]Change in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Quality of Life Physical Component
NCT02242201 (9) [back to overview]Change in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Quality of Life Mental Component
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EQVAS Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EQVAS Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EQVAS Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EQVAS Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: Quinnell Grading Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: Quinnell Grading Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: Quinnell Grading Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: Quinnell Grading Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: Quinnell Grading Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: VAS Pain Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Functional Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: VAS Pain Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: VAS Pain Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: VAS Pain Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Functional Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Functional Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Functional Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]De Quervain's Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Functional Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EQVAS Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) Over Lateral Epicondyle
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-5D Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-5D Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]De Quervain's Treatment Group: QuickDASH Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]De Quervain's Treatment Group: QuickDASH Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]De Quervain's Treatment Group: QuickDASH Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]De Quervain's Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]De Quervain's Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-5D Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-5D Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-5D Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-5D Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) in Lateral Epicondyle
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) Over Lateral Epicondyle
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) With Resisted Wrist Extension
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) With Resisted Wrist Extension
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) With Resisted Wrist Extension
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores
NCT02266433 (55) [back to overview]Trigger Finger Treatment Group: VAS Pain Scores
NCT02312739 (5) [back to overview]Provider Ease of Insertion (0-100mm VAS)
NCT02312739 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pain Scale Measurement During and After the Procedure
NCT02312739 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Patient Anxiety Scale After the Procedure
NCT02312739 (5) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction (5-point Likert Scale)
NCT02312739 (5) [back to overview]Pain Scale Measurement - Maximum Pain Experienced
NCT02313675 (2) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption (Number of Pills Taken)
NCT02313675 (2) [back to overview]Postoperative Pain (Pain Scores From 0-10 Scale)
NCT02344225 (2) [back to overview]Length of Hospital Stay
NCT02344225 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
NCT02358681 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Reported Sustained Headache Relief at 24-hour Follow-up
NCT02358681 (11) [back to overview]Change in Pain Score After Analgesic Administration (Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R)
NCT02358681 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Headache Freedom During Emergency Department Visit
NCT02358681 (11) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Pain Score Between Baseline and One Hour
NCT02358681 (11) [back to overview]Time to Achieve Clinically Significant Reduction in Pain After Analgesic Administration (Pain Score)
NCT02358681 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Headache Relief During Emergency Department Visit
NCT02358681 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Received Rescue Medications During Emergency Department Visit
NCT02358681 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Reported Positive Overall Efficacy and Tolerability at 24-hour Follow-up
NCT02358681 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Reported Sustained Headache Freedom at 24-hour Follow-up
NCT02358681 (11) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT02358681 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Used Rescue Medication(s) Within 24 Hours After Emergency Department Discharge
NCT02509312 (11) [back to overview]Anti-emetic Doses
NCT02509312 (11) [back to overview]Total Hydromorphone Dose
NCT02509312 (11) [back to overview]Pruritus Doses
NCT02509312 (11) [back to overview]Percentile Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at 6,12, and 24 Hours
NCT02509312 (11) [back to overview]Post-Partum Hemorrhage
NCT02509312 (11) [back to overview]Estimated Blood Loss (EBL)
NCT02509312 (11) [back to overview]Units of Packed Reb Blood Cell Transfused
NCT02509312 (11) [back to overview]Corrected Change in Hct on POD1.
NCT02509312 (11) [back to overview]Percentile Change in Systolic Blood Pressure at 6,12, and 24 Hours
NCT02509312 (11) [back to overview]Change in Pain Score Post-Cesarean Delivery
NCT02509312 (11) [back to overview]Uterotonic Doses
NCT02543801 (3) [back to overview]Length of Stay
NCT02543801 (3) [back to overview]Narcotic Consumption
NCT02543801 (3) [back to overview]Pain Score
NCT02570503 (1) [back to overview]Narcotic Use During Hospitalization
NCT02658149 (5) [back to overview]Pain Score at 3-24 Hours
NCT02658149 (5) [back to overview]Pain Score at 3 Hours
NCT02658149 (5) [back to overview]Opioid Usage In-hospital at 48 Hours
NCT02658149 (5) [back to overview]Opioid Usage In-hospital at 24 Hours
NCT02658149 (5) [back to overview]Pain Score at 24-48 Hours
NCT02691572 (1) [back to overview]Cumulative Fentanyl Dose
NCT02700451 (16) [back to overview]Veterans Rand - 12
NCT02700451 (16) [back to overview]Veterans Rand - 12
NCT02700451 (16) [back to overview]Veterans Rand - 12
NCT02700451 (16) [back to overview]Opioid Related Side Effects
NCT02700451 (16) [back to overview]Veterans Rand - 12
NCT02700451 (16) [back to overview]Perioperative Opioid Use
NCT02700451 (16) [back to overview]Perioperative Complications - Drain Output
NCT02700451 (16) [back to overview]Numerical Pain Rating Scale
NCT02700451 (16) [back to overview]Numerical Pain Rating Scale
NCT02700451 (16) [back to overview]Numerical Pain Rating Scale
NCT02700451 (16) [back to overview]Brief Pain Inventory
NCT02700451 (16) [back to overview]Oswestry Disability Index
NCT02700451 (16) [back to overview]Oswestry Disability Index
NCT02700451 (16) [back to overview]Oswestry Disability Index
NCT02700451 (16) [back to overview]Oswestry Disability Index
NCT02700451 (16) [back to overview]Length of Stay
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Chronic Pain
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Experiencing Vomiting
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Experiencing Pruritus
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Experiencing Vomiting
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Experiencing Vomiting
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Experiencing Pruritus
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Experiencing Pruritus
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Experiencing Nausea
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Experiencing Nausea
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Experiencing Nausea
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Pain Scores at Rest
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Pain Score on Movement
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Time to First Rescue Analgesic
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Postpartum Depression, as Measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Postpartum Depression, as Measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction With Postoperative Analgesia on a 0-10 Scale
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Pain Scores at Rest
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Pain Scores at Rest
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Pain Score on Movement (Sitting in Bed From a Supine Position)
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption
NCT02829944 (23) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Chronic Pain
NCT02881996 (2) [back to overview]Time Until PCA Discontinued After the Operation
NCT02881996 (2) [back to overview]Postoperative Duration of Hospital Stay
NCT02895035 (4) [back to overview]Number of Eyes With Pupil Diameter Less Than 6 mm During Cortical Clean-up
NCT02895035 (4) [back to overview]Number of Eyes With Pupil Diameter Less Than 6 mm at Any Time During Surgery
NCT02895035 (4) [back to overview]Maximum Intraoperative Change in Pupil Diameter
NCT02895035 (4) [back to overview]Mean Area Under the Curve Change From Baseline in Pupil Diameter Over Time to the End of Cataract Surgery
NCT02902770 (1) [back to overview]Pain Score at 30 Minutes
NCT02922985 (10) [back to overview]Apgar Score at 5 Minutes
NCT02922985 (10) [back to overview]Time to First Administration of Opioid Pain Medication Post Operatively
NCT02922985 (10) [back to overview]Pain Score at 6-12 Hours Post Operatively
NCT02922985 (10) [back to overview]Pain Score at 48 Hours Post-operatively
NCT02922985 (10) [back to overview]Number of Opioid Pain Tablets Remaining on Post-operative Day #7 From the Discharge Prescription.
NCT02922985 (10) [back to overview]NICU Admission
NCT02922985 (10) [back to overview]Need for Respiratory Support
NCT02922985 (10) [back to overview]Hospital Length of Stay
NCT02922985 (10) [back to overview]Pain Score at 24 Hours Post-operatively
NCT02922985 (10) [back to overview]Total Opioid Intake in Morphine Milligram Equivalents in the First 48 Hours After Cesarean Delivery (CD)
NCT02956616 (4) [back to overview]Breastfeeding Initiation
NCT02956616 (4) [back to overview]Postoperative Pain Medication Requirement
NCT02956616 (4) [back to overview]Discharge on Postoperative Day #2
NCT02956616 (4) [back to overview]Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay
NCT03028012 (3) [back to overview]Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRS) at Baseline and Three Months.
NCT03028012 (3) [back to overview]Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Modified
NCT03028012 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Responder Rate Greater Than 50% on the Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRS) Improvement
NCT03031795 (1) [back to overview]Pain Before, During and After IUD Placement
NCT03331315 (8) [back to overview]Days of Oral Narcotic Use After Discharge
NCT03331315 (8) [back to overview]Number of Oral Narcotic Pills Used After Discharge
NCT03331315 (8) [back to overview]Average Inpatient Postoperative Pain Score
NCT03331315 (8) [back to overview]Average Inpatient Ondansetron Use
NCT03331315 (8) [back to overview]Return to Activities of Daily Living
NCT03331315 (8) [back to overview]Average Inpatient Hydromorphone Use
NCT03331315 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Perioperative Complications
NCT03331315 (8) [back to overview]Total Hospital Stay
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Pain as Assessed by Score on the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS)
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Overall Costs
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Opioid Use Per Day
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Number of Ventilator Days
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants Discharged From the Hospital With an Opioid Prescription
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Number of Intensive Care Unti (ICU) Days
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Number of Hospital Days
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Pharmacy Costs
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Opioid-related Complications
NCT03472469 (10) [back to overview]Pain as Assessed by Score on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
NCT03584373 (7) [back to overview]Average Pain Intensity Level
NCT03584373 (7) [back to overview]Unused Medications - Proportion of Prescribed Pills Unused at 1 Week Post-Surgery
NCT03584373 (7) [back to overview]Satisfaction With Pain Relief
NCT03584373 (7) [back to overview]Rates of Constipation
NCT03584373 (7) [back to overview]Perception of an Acceptable Pain Intensity Level
NCT03584373 (7) [back to overview]Peak Pain Intensity Level
NCT03584373 (7) [back to overview]Current Pain Intensity Level
NCT03599089 (3) [back to overview]Change in Postsurgical Pain Based on the Weighted Sum of Pain Intensity (SPI) Assessments Over 96 Hours of the NRS Scores = Area Under the Curve (AUC)
NCT03599089 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Opioid Free
NCT03599089 (3) [back to overview]Total Opioid Consumption (in Daily Morphine Equivalents)
NCT03669081 (6) [back to overview]Serum Creatinine Levels at One Year Post-operatively
NCT03669081 (6) [back to overview]Cumulative Narcotic Use
NCT03669081 (6) [back to overview]30 Day Mortality
NCT03669081 (6) [back to overview]Length of Hospital Stay
NCT03669081 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Urinary Retention
NCT03669081 (6) [back to overview]Bleeding Risk
NCT03678675 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Pain Score Greater Than 3
NCT03678675 (7) [back to overview]Postoperative Change in Hematocrit
NCT03678675 (7) [back to overview]Postoperative Satisfaction With Inpatient Pain Control
NCT03678675 (7) [back to overview]Change in Creatinine
NCT03678675 (7) [back to overview]Postoperative Satisfaction With Their Inpatient Postpartum Care.
NCT03678675 (7) [back to overview]The Number of Patients That Used no Opioid Postoperatively
NCT03678675 (7) [back to overview]The Total Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) Used in the First 72 Postoperative Hours
NCT03693404 (3) [back to overview]Score on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain
NCT03693404 (3) [back to overview]Ambulation Distance
NCT03693404 (3) [back to overview]Amount (mg) of Narcotics (Oral Morphine mg Equivalents) Used
NCT03695367 (5) [back to overview]Percentge of Subjects in Severe Pain With Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-R; Windowed Worst Observation Carried Forward) of Pain Intensity Scores >7 on a Scale of 0-10 at Any Point. NRS-R for Pain Where 0 Equals no Pain and 10 Equals Worst Pain Imaginable.
NCT03695367 (5) [back to overview]Percentge of Subjects Receiving no Opioid Rescue
NCT03695367 (5) [back to overview]Total Postoperative Opioid Consumption (in IV Morphine Milligram Equivalents [IV MME])
NCT03695367 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Receiving no Opioid Rescue
NCT03695367 (5) [back to overview]Percentge of Subjects Receiving no Opioid Rescue
NCT03861611 (4) [back to overview]Worst LBP 2 Days After ED Visit
NCT03861611 (4) [back to overview]How Often Participants Used Assigned Medication
NCT03861611 (4) [back to overview]Frequency of LBP 2 Days After ED Visit
NCT03861611 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Day 5 in Functional Impairment
NCT03885596 (5) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Scores at 72 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
NCT03885596 (5) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores (at Rest) Over 72h
NCT03885596 (5) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Scores at 48 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
NCT03885596 (5) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Scores at 24 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
NCT03885596 (5) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption
NCT03967847 (2) [back to overview]Postoperative Visual Analog Scale Scores
NCT03967847 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Retear of Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT04112160 (6) [back to overview]Visual Analog Pain (VAS) Pain Scale 7 Days Following Stent Removal.
NCT04112160 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients That Required Opioid Medication Following Ureteral Stent Removal
NCT04112160 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Unscheduled Return to Clinic or Emergency Room
NCT04112160 (6) [back to overview]Median Visual Analog Pain (VAS) Pain Scale Experienced by Participant 24 Hours Following Stent Removal
NCT04112160 (6) [back to overview]Average Number of Days the Participant Missed Work
NCT04112160 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants That Experienced an Injection Complication
NCT04115644 (8) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale
NCT04115644 (8) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale
NCT04115644 (8) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale
NCT04115644 (8) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale
NCT04115644 (8) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale
NCT04115644 (8) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale
NCT04115644 (8) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale
NCT04115644 (8) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale
NCT04246541 (2) [back to overview]Narcotic Medication Consumed
NCT04246541 (2) [back to overview]Pain Levels Recorded With a Visual Analogue Scale
NCT04246554 (2) [back to overview]Postoperative Visual Analogue Scale Scores
NCT04246554 (2) [back to overview]Narcotic Medication
NCT04322968 (5) [back to overview]Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R)
NCT04322968 (5) [back to overview]Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R)
NCT04322968 (5) [back to overview]Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form)
NCT04322968 (5) [back to overview]Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
NCT04322968 (5) [back to overview]Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
NCT04429022 (8) [back to overview]Total Opioid Pain Medications Required 0-3h Post op in Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME)
NCT04429022 (8) [back to overview]Pain Scores
NCT04429022 (8) [back to overview]Pain Scores
NCT04429022 (8) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Return to the Clinic, Emergency Department Due to Post Operative Pain Within a 2 Week Period
NCT04429022 (8) [back to overview]Length of Stay in Hours
NCT04429022 (8) [back to overview]Estimated Blood Loss
NCT04429022 (8) [back to overview]Total Opioid Pain Medications Required Through 3-24h Post op in MME
NCT04429022 (8) [back to overview]Operative Time

Dyspepsia

Number of participants who reported discomfort in the stomach related to eating or drinking (NCT00115336)
Timeframe: The entire study period (daily assessments during hospitalization [mean of 81.5 hours] and once at the 30-day follow-up visit, over a mean of 33.4 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
IV Ketorolac / Oral Placebo0
IV Placebo / Oral Ibuprofen0

[back to top]

Total Parenteral Opioid Usage

Sum of all parenteral opioids used during the study period in milligrams (mg) of morphine or morphine equivalents. (NCT00115336)
Timeframe: The duration of the entire hospitalization, over a mean hospitalization duration of 81.5 hours.

Interventionmilligrams (mg) of morphine equivalents (Mean)
IV Ketorolac / Oral Placebo225.2
IV Placebo / Oral Ibuprofen264.6

[back to top]

Time to a 50% Reduction in Reported Pain Intensity

The primary endpoint is the time to a 50% reduction in reported pain intensity. This endpoint is relative to the baseline pain intensity rating on the Oucher scale (minimum 0, maximum 10; higher scores indicate greater pain). The endpoint will be reached when the reported pain intensity is at least one-half of the baseline value on two consecutive measurements at least 4 hours apart. The time ascribed to the endpoint will be the time of the second of these two consecutive pain scales. Participants who do not have a 50% reduction in reported pain intensity, as defined above, before discharge from the hospital will be censored at the time of last rating on the Oucher pain scale before discharge from the hospital (NCT00115336)
Timeframe: Measured every 4 hours during hospitalization, over a mean hospitalization duration of 81.5 hours.

Interventionhours (Mean)
IV Ketorolac / Oral Placebo58.4
IV Placebo / Oral Ibuprofen68.0

[back to top]

Occurrence of Azotemia

Participants who had measured values of blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine, or both that were above the upper limit of normal for age. (NCT00115336)
Timeframe: The duration of the entire hospitalization, over a mean hospitalization duration of 81.5 hours.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
IV Ketorolac / Oral Placebo0
IV Placebo / Oral Ibuprofen0

[back to top]

Hematuria

Number of participants who had microscopic hematuria as determined by urinalysis (NCT00115336)
Timeframe: The duration of the entire hospitalization, over a mean hospitalization duration of 81.5 hours.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
IV Ketorolac / Oral Placebo4
IV Placebo / Oral Ibuprofen1

[back to top]

Duration of Hospitalization

Time between admission to the hospital and discharge from the hospital (NCT00115336)
Timeframe: The duration of the entire hospitalization, over a mean hospitalization duration of 81.5 hours.

Interventionhours (Mean)
IV Ketorolac / Oral Placebo80.7
IV Placebo / Oral Ibuprofen83.0

[back to top]

Bleeding

Number of participants who had clinically overt bleeding from any site. This excludes microscopic hematuria only. (NCT00115336)
Timeframe: The entire study period (daily assessments during hospitalization [mean of 81.5 hours] and once at the 30-day follow-up visit, over a mean of 33.4 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
IV Ketorolac / Oral Placebo0
IV Placebo / Oral Ibuprofen0

[back to top]

Gastrointestinal Ulceration

Number of participants who had gastrointestinal ulceration. (NCT00115336)
Timeframe: The entire study period (daily assessments during hospitalization [mean of 81.5 hours] and once at the 30-day follow-up visit, over a mean of 33.4 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
IV Ketorolac / Oral Placebo0
IV Placebo / Oral Ibuprofen0

[back to top]

Fluid Retention

Number of participants who had clinically overt fluid retention as determined by history, physical examination, vital signs, and weight (e.g., peripheral edema, increase in weight) (NCT00115336)
Timeframe: The entire study period (daily assessments during hospitalization [mean of 81.5 hours] and once at the 30-day follow-up visit, over a mean of 33.4 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intravenous Ketorolac and Oral Placebo0
Intravenous Placebo and Oral Ibuprofen0

[back to top]

Interocular Pressure

IOP, measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (NCT00478036)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineDay 1Week 1Week 4week 8
Acular LS16.111.615.214.314.0
Pred Forte17.012.415.714.015.0
Refresh Tears17.813.415.614.615.8

[back to top]

The Number of Treated Subjects Who Became Pain-free (IHS Grade 0) by Observation Time Point

Pain was evaluated using a 4-point International Headache Society (IHS) scale where grade 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain (NCT00483717)
Timeframe: 48 hours post-dosing

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ketorolac Tromethamine33
Placebo15

[back to top]

The Number of Treated Subjects Who Became Pain-free (International Headache Society Grade of 0 = no Pain) by Observation Time Point.

Pain was evaluated using a 4-point International Headache Society (IHS) scale where grade 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain (NCT00483717)
Timeframe: 2 hours after dosing

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ketorolac Tromethamine12
Placebo7

[back to top]

The Number of Treated Subjects Who Became Pain-free (IHS Grade 0) by Observation Time Point

Pain was evaluated using a 4-point International Headache Society (IHS) scale where grade 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain (NCT00483717)
Timeframe: 24 hours post-dosing

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ketorolac Tromethamine37
Placebo18

[back to top]

The Number of Treated Subjects Who Became Pain-free (IHS Grade 0) by Observation Time Point

Pain was evaluated using a 4-point International Headache Society (IHS) scale where grade 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain (NCT00483717)
Timeframe: 3 hours post-dosing

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ketorolac Tromethamine22
Placebo10

[back to top]

The Number of Treated Subjects Who Became Pain-free (IHS Grade 0) by Observation Time Point

Pain was evaluated using a 4-point International Headache Society (IHS) scale where grade 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain (NCT00483717)
Timeframe: 0.5 hours post-dosing

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ketorolac Tromethamine2
Placebo1

[back to top]

The Number of Treated Subjects Who Became Pain-free (IHS Grade 0) by Observation Time Point

Pain was evaluated using a 4-point International Headache Society (IHS) scale where grade 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain (NCT00483717)
Timeframe: 1 hour post-dosing

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ketorolac Tromethamine12
Placebo4

[back to top]

The Number of Treated Subjects Who Became Pain-free (IHS Grade 0) by Observation Time Point

Pain was evaluated using a 4-point International Headache Society (IHS) scale where grade 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain (NCT00483717)
Timeframe: 1.5 hours post-dosing

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ketorolac Tromethamine19
Placebo6

[back to top]

The Number of Treated Subjects Who Became Pain-free (IHS Grade 0) by Observation Time Point

Pain was evaluated using a 4-point International Headache Society (IHS) scale where grade 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain (NCT00483717)
Timeframe: 4 hours post-dosing

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ketorolac Tromethamine25
Placebo11

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Differences (PID) Over Time

Pain intensity was measured on VAS (from 0 mm to 100 mm: 0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain). For each post dose time point, PID is derived by subtracting the pain intensity at the post dose time point from the baseline intensity score (baseline score - post-baseline score). PID score range at any post dose (post baseline) evaluation time point was -100 to 100. A positive difference score is indicative of improvement. (NCT00507026)
Timeframe: Baseline (0 hour), 5, 10, 15, 30, 45 minutes post first dose, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 hours post first dose

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
At 5 minutesAt 10 minutesAt 15 minutesAt 30 minutesAt 45 minutesAt 1 hourAt 2 hoursAt 3 hoursAt 5 hoursAt 6 hoursAt 9 hoursAt 12 hoursAt 15 hoursAt 18 hoursAt 21 hoursAt 24 hoursAt 48 hoursAt 72 hoursAt 96 hoursAt 120 hours
Diclofenac (DIC075V)5.29.113.417.718.518.717.313.510.812.623.623.428.530.236.331.842.947.046.846.9
Ketorolac3.25.59.816.718.419.716.914.715.112.521.323.723.230.139.127.535.541.043.042.9

[back to top]

Sum of the Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Over 120 Hours

Pain intensity was measured on VAS (from 0 mm to 100 mm: 0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain). For each post dose time point, PID is derived by subtracting the pain intensity at the post dose time point from the baseline intensity score (baseline score - post-baseline score). A positive difference is indicative of improvement. SPIDs was calculated by multiplying the PID score at each post-dose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point and then summing these values over the specific time period. SPID over 120 hours ranges from -12000 to 12000. A higher value indicates a better pain reduction. (NCT00507026)
Timeframe: Over 120 hours post first dose

Interventionmm*hours (Mean)
Diclofenac (DIC075V)4835.6
Ketorolac4359.1
Placebo1840.5

[back to top]

Sum of the Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Over 24 Hours

Pain intensity was measured on VAS (from 0 mm to 100 mm: 0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain). For each post dose time point, pain intensity difference (PID) is derived by subtracting the pain intensity at the post dose time point from the baseline intensity score (baseline score - post-baseline score). A positive difference is indicative of improvement. SPIDs was calculated by multiplying the PID score at each post-dose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point and then summing these values over the specific time period. SPID over 24 hours ranges from -2400 to 2400. A higher value indicates a better pain reduction. (NCT00507026)
Timeframe: Over 24 hours post first dose

Interventionmm*hours (Mean)
Diclofenac (DIC075V)577.0
Ketorolac563.2
Placebo28.0

[back to top]

Sum of the Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Over 48 Hours

Pain intensity was measured on VAS (from 0 mm to 100 mm: 0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain). For each post dose time point, PID is derived by subtracting the pain intensity at the post dose time point from the baseline intensity score (baseline score - post-baseline score). A positive difference is indicative of improvement. SPIDs was calculated by multiplying the PID score at each post-dose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point and then summing these values over the specific time period. SPID over 48 hours ranges from -4800 to 4800. A higher value indicates a better pain reduction. (NCT00507026)
Timeframe: Over 48 hours post first dose

Interventionmm*hours (Mean)
Diclofenac (DIC075V)1527.5
Ketorolac1371.8
Placebo400.4

[back to top]

Sum of the Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Over 72 Hours

Pain intensity was measured on VAS (from 0 mm to 100 mm: 0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain). For each post dose time point, PID is derived by subtracting the pain intensity at the post dose time point from the baseline intensity score (baseline score - post-baseline score). A positive difference is indicative of improvement. SPIDs was calculated by multiplying the PID score at each post-dose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point and then summing these values over the specific time period. SPID over 72 hours ranges from -7200 to 7200. A higher value indicates a better pain reduction. (NCT00507026)
Timeframe: Over 72 hours post first dose

Interventionmm*hours (Mean)
Diclofenac (DIC075V)2592.1
Ketorolac2312.1
Placebo836.8

[back to top]

Sum of the Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Over 96 Hours

Pain intensity was measured on VAS (from 0 mm to 100 mm: 0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain). For each post dose time point, PID is derived by subtracting the pain intensity at the post dose time point from the baseline intensity score (baseline score - post-baseline score). A positive difference is indicative of improvement. SPIDs was calculated by multiplying the PID score at each post-dose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point and then summing these values over the specific time period. SPID over 96 hours ranges from -9600 to 9600. A higher value indicates a better pain reduction. (NCT00507026)
Timeframe: Over 96 hours post first dose

Interventionmm*hours (Mean)
Diclofenac (DIC075V)3711.3
Ketorolac3331.9
Placebo1337.8

[back to top]

Time From Administration of Study Drug to Administration of Rescue Medication

Time from administration of study drug to administration of rescue medication were censored at time of last pain assessment for participants who did not receive rescue medication. Rescue medication was additional pain medication, available to participants if they did not receive pain relief from the study drug. Rescue medication available during this study was IV morphine. (NCT00507026)
Timeframe: Maximum up to 5 days

InterventionMinutes (Median)
Diclofenac (DIC075V)220.0
Ketorolac137.0
Placebo51.0

[back to top]

Time to Meaningful Relief

Participants were instructed to stop the second stopwatch at the onset of meaningful pain relief after first dose. Event times of participants not reporting meaningful relief were censored at 6 hours; event times of participants who withdrew or were administered rescue medication were censored at time of withdrawal or rescue. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for analysis. (NCT00507026)
Timeframe: Within 6 hours of first dose on Day 1

InterventionMinutes (Median)
Diclofenac (DIC075V)41.6
Ketorolac42.5
PlaceboNA

[back to top]

Time to Perceptible Relief

Participants were instructed to stop the first stopwatch at the onset of perceptible pain relief after first dose. Event times of participants not reporting perceptible relief were censored at 6 hours; event times of participants who withdrew or were administered rescue medication were censored at time of withdrawal or rescue. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for analysis. (NCT00507026)
Timeframe: Within 6 hours of first dose on Day 1

InterventionMinutes (Median)
Diclofenac (DIC075V)10.0
Ketorolac14.4
Placebo15.0

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Differences (PID) Over Time

Pain intensity was measured on VAS (from 0 mm to 100 mm: 0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain). For each post dose time point, PID is derived by subtracting the pain intensity at the post dose time point from the baseline intensity score (baseline score - post-baseline score). PID score range at any post dose (post baseline) evaluation time point was -100 to 100. A positive difference score is indicative of improvement. (NCT00507026)
Timeframe: Baseline (0 hour), 5, 10, 15, 30, 45 minutes post first dose, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 hours post first dose

Interventionmm (Mean)
At 5 minutesAt 10 minutesAt 15 minutesAt 30 minutesAt 45 minutesAt 1 hourAt 2 hoursAt 3 hoursAt 5 hoursAt 6 hoursAt 9 hoursAt 12 hoursAt 15 hoursAt 18 hoursAt 21 hoursAt 24 hoursAt 48 hoursAt 72 hoursAt 120 hours
Placebo1.22.42.22.6-1.2-4.2-7.8-8.9-7.3-6.1-1.81.41.18.78.812.919.420.320.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants According to Frequency of Use of Rescue Medication

In this outcome measure, number of participants are reported according to number of times they received rescue medication. Rescue medication was additional pain medication, available to participants if they did not receive pain relief from the study drug. Rescue medication available during this study was IV morphine. Only those categories with at least one nonzero value are reported. (NCT00507026)
Timeframe: 0-24, 0-48, 0-72, 0-96 and 0-120 hours post first dose

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
0 - 24 Hours: 00 - 24 Hours: 10 - 24 Hours: 20 - 24 Hours: 30 - 24 Hours: 40 - 24 Hours: 50 - 24 Hours: 60 - 24 Hours: 70 - 24 Hours: 80 - 24 Hours: 90 - 24 Hours: 110 - 24 Hours: 120 - 24 Hours: 130 - 24 Hours: 140 - 24 Hours: 150-48 hours: 00-48 hours: 10-48 hours: 20-48 hours: 30-48 hours: 40-48 hours: 50-48 hours: 60-48 hours: 70-48 hours: 80-48 hours: 90-48 hours: 100-48 hours: 110-48 hours: 120-48 hours: 130-48 hours: 140-48 hours: 150-48 hours: 170-48 hours: 200-72 hours: 00-72 hours: 10-72 hours: 20-72 hours: 30-72 hours: 40-72 hours: 50-72 hours: 60-72 hours: 70-72 hours: 80-72 hours: 90-72 hours: 100-72 hours: 110-72 hours: 120-72 hours: 130-72 hours: 140-72 hours: 150-72 hours: 170-72 hours: 190-72 hours: 200-72 hours: 210-96 hours: 00-96 hours: 10-96 hours: 20-96 hours: 30-96 hours: 40-96 hours: 50-96 hours: 60-96 hours: 70-96 hours: 80-96 hours: 90-96 hours: 100-96 hours: 110-96 hours: 120-96 hours: 130-96 hours: 140-96 hours: 150-96 hours: 170-96 hours: 190-96 hours: 200-96 hours: 210-120 hours: 00-120 hours: 10-120 hours: 20-120 hours: 30-120 hours: 40-120 hours: 50-120 hours: 60-120 hours: 70-120 hours: 80-120 hours: 90-120 hours: 100-120 hours: 110-120 hours: 120-120 hours: 130-120 hours: 140-120 hours: 150-120 hours: 170-120 hours: 190-120 hours: 200-120 hours: 21
Diclofenac (DIC075V)392626198973231110038232414117863423110000382322151168443532100000038232215116753353310000003823221511675335331000000
Ketorolac176984335211100016510523243421210000165105222421421102100016510522242133110210001651052224213221021000
Placebo476119937443211114761038583505311111476103576299023120111476103567290231220111476103567290231220111

[back to top]

Cumulative Amount of Rescue Medication

In this outcome measure, cumulative amount of rescue medication used over 0-24, 0-48, 0-72, 0-96, and 0-120 hours were reported. Rescue medication was additional pain medication, available to participants if they did not receive pain relief from the study drug. Rescue medication available during this study was IV morphine. (NCT00507026)
Timeframe: 0-24, 0-48, 0-72, 0-96 and 0-120 hours

,,
Interventionmg (Mean)
0-24 hours0-48 hours0-72 hours0-96 hours0-120 hours
Diclofenac (DIC075V)9.411.111.711.811.8
Ketorolac11.515.518.018.118.1
Placebo16.019.020.520.520.5

[back to top]

Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR)

Pain relief values at specified time points were measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where higher values indicate greater pain relief. TOTPAR over specified time interval was calculated as area under pain relief curve over specified time intervals using trapezoidal approximation. For 0-24 hours score range was 0-2400, for 0-48 hours score range was 0- 4800, for 0-96 hours score range was 0-9600 and for 0-120 hours score range was 0-12000. Higher TOTPAR values indicated more relief. (NCT00507026)
Timeframe: 0-24, 0-48, 0-72, 0-96 and 0-120 hours post first dose

,,
Interventionmm*hours (Mean)
0-24 hours0-48 hours0-72 hours0-96 hours0-120 hours
Diclofenac (DIC075V)1177.62768.34471.06252.28042.5
Ketorolac1065.42453.83983.65575.77178.0
Placebo484.71327.92214.63159.44105.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Attaining Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30 Percent (%) Reduction From Baseline in Pain Intensity

Pain intensity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, larger values indicate greater pain intensity. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants attaining >= 30 % reduction in pain intensity from baseline to specified time points was reported. (NCT00507026)
Timeframe: Baseline (0 hour), 5, 30 minutes post first dose, 1, 24, 48, 72, 90, 120 hours post first dose

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
At 5 minutesAt 30 minutesAt 1 hourAt 24 hoursAt 48 hoursAt 72 hoursAt 90 hoursAt 120 hours
Diclofenac (DIC075V)13.843.444.862.175.280.080.080.7
Ketorolac10.035.041.756.763.371.775.075.0
Placebo8.325.015.331.0941.741.743.143.1

[back to top]

Participant Global Evaluation Over Time

Participants global evaluation of study medication was accessed on a scale ranging from scale 0 to 4 where 0= poor, 1= fair, 2= good, 3= very good, 4= excellent where higher score represented better outcome. (NCT00507026)
Timeframe: 0-24, 0-48, 0-120 hours post-dose

,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
0-24 Hours0-48 Hours0-120 Hours
Diclofenac (DIC075V)2.62.92.9
Ketorolac2.42.62.6
Placebo1.11.91.3

[back to top]

Visual Analog Pain Relief Values Over the Time

Pain relief values at specified time points were measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where higher values indicate greater pain relief. (NCT00507026)
Timeframe: 5, 10, 15, 30, 45 minutes post first dose, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 hours post first dose

,,
Interventionmm (Mean)
At 5 minutesAt 10 minutesAt 15 minutesAt 30 minutesAt 45 minutesAt 1 hourAt 2 hoursAt 3 hoursAt 5 hoursAt 6 hoursAt 9 hoursAt 12 hoursAt 15 hoursAt 18 hoursAt 21 hoursAt 24 hoursAt 48 hoursAt 72 hoursAt 96 hoursAt 120 hours
Diclofenac (DIC075V)21.927.133.539.741.640.035.333.528.836.749.551.655.756.663.659.769.474.474.674.6
Ketorolac17.923.627.233.933.337.833.229.531.033.939.446.345.953.663.253.460.864.867.066.9
Placebo15.319.021.623.119.917.110.18.08.012.617.521.621.428.327.432.538.238.839.439.4

[back to top]

Mean Pupil Area

Pupil area post-irrigation and aspiration (NCT00521456)
Timeframe: Day 0

Interventionmillimeters squared (mm²) (Mean)
Ketorolac Solution37.9
Vehicle Solution36.5

[back to top]

Resolution of Post Operative Inflammation

Anterior chamber inflammation is the sum of biomicroscopic cell and flare; each measured on a scale of 0-4 (Flare: 0 = no flare, 4 = intense flare / Cell: 0 = no cells, 4 = >50 cells) (NCT00521456)
Timeframe: Day 14

Intervention% of participants with a score of 0 (Number)
Ketorolac Solution58.0
Vehicle Solution27.3

[back to top]

Visual Acuity

Patients with ≥ 3 line improvement in visual acuity (NCT00521456)
Timeframe: Change from baseline at Day 14

InterventionPercentage of patients with ≥ 3 lines (Number)
Ketorolac Solution56.9
Vehicle Solution36.3

[back to top]

Ocular Pain

Measured on a scale of 0-4 (0 = none, 4 = intolerable) (NCT00521456)
Timeframe: Day 1

Intervention% of participants with a score of 0 (Number)
Ketorolac Solution70.0
Vehicle Solution38.5

[back to top]

Resolution of Post Operative Inflammation

Anterior chamber inflammation is the sum of biomicroscopic cell and flare; each measured on a scale of 0-4 (Flare: 0 = no flare, 4 = intense flare / Cell: 0 = no cells, 4 = >50 cells) (NCT00524264)
Timeframe: Day 14

Intervention% of participants with a score of 0 (Number)
Ketorolac Solution46.3
Vehicle Solution25.6

[back to top]

Ocular Pain

Measured on a scale of 0-4 (0 = none, 4 = intolerable) (NCT00524264)
Timeframe: Day 1

Intervention% of participants with a score of 0 (Number)
Ketorolac Solution75.0
Vehicle Solution41.0

[back to top]

Mean Pupil Area

Pupil area post-irrigation and aspiration (NCT00524264)
Timeframe: Day 0

Interventionmillimeters squared (mm²) (Mean)
Ketorolac Solution41.8
Vehicle Solution41.1

[back to top]

Visual Acuity

Patients with ≥ 3 line improvement in visual acuity (NCT00524264)
Timeframe: Change from baseline at Day 14

InterventionPercentage of patients with ≥ 3 lines (Number)
Ketorolac Solution59.5
Vehicle Solution46.2

[back to top]

Opioid Use

Morphine used by patient controlled analgesia. Amount of used morphine during the first 48 hours after surgery were documented in the CRF by the pain nurses. (NCT00562627)
Timeframe: 48 hours postoperative

Interventionmg (Mean)
LIA IV (Local Infiltration Analgesia, Intravenous)77
LIA IA, (Local Infiltration Analgesia, Intra-articular)49
Epidural54

[back to top]

Pain at Rest (VAS)

VAS (pain at rest) 0-100 mm. VAS 0 mm means no pain and VAS 100 mm means maximal pain. (NCT00562627)
Timeframe: 48 hours postoperative

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
LIA IV (Local Infiltration Analgesia, Intravenous)18
LIA IA, (Local Infiltration Analgesia, Intra-articular)12
Epidural30

[back to top]

Time to Readiness for Discharge

Each postoperative day, discharge readiness was assessed by an orthopaedic surgeon, a pain nurse, a ward nurse, and a physiotherapist according to the following criteria: no evidence for surgical complications, VAS pain at rest ≤30 mm which is controlled by oral analgesics, ability to eat and drink, ability to walk with elbow crutches, and ability to climb ≥8 stairs. (NCT00562627)
Timeframe: up to 10 days postoperative

Interventiondays (Mean)
LIA IV (Local Infiltration Analgesia, Intravenous)4
LIA IA, (Local Infiltration Analgesia, Intra-articular)3.5
Epidural5.5

[back to top]

Level of Pain During Specific Time Intervals Throughout D&C Procedure.

"100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during specific time intervals of D&C procedure: minimum: 0 mm (less pain); maximum: 100 mm (more pain)~Time intervals include: basline expected level of pain during procedure, after speculum insertion, at paracervical block injection, after dilation, end of procedure, and 30 minutes after procedure." (NCT00617097)
Timeframe: Baseline, Speculum Insertion, at Paracervical block injection, After dilation, End of procedure, 30 minutes after procedure

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
expected level of pain during procedureafter speculum insertionduring paracervical block administrationafter cervical dilationimmediately after procedure30 min after procedure
Paracervical Block With Ketorolac and Lidocaine51.732.746.059.864.317.6
Paracervical Block With Lidocaine52.233.650.874.861.521.8

[back to top]

Visual Analogue Scale Regarding Satisfaction Level

100-mm Visual Analogue Scale -- minimum: 0 mm (lower satisfaction), maximum: 100 mm (greater satisfaction) (NCT00617097)
Timeframe: end of study (prior to clinic discharge)

Interventionmm (Mean)
Paracervical Block With Lidocaine62.9
Paracervical Block With Ketorolac and Lidocaine63.6

[back to top]

Reported Symptoms

fever, chills, vomiting, heavy bleeding/clots (collected without regard to the specific event) (NCT00617097)
Timeframe: end of study (upon discharge from facility after procedure)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Paracervical Block With Lidocaine3
Paracervical Block With Ketorolac and Lidocaine0

[back to top]

Complications

(NCT00617097)
Timeframe: end of study

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
minorserious
Paracervical Block With Ketorolac and Lidocaine12
Paracervical Block With Lidocaine10

[back to top]

Present Pain Intensity

Pain was assessed preoperatively, 2 days, and 2 and 6 months after surgery using a 0-10 (10 being worse) verbal Present Pain Intensity (PPI) scale (NCT00621530)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PreoperativePostoperative: 2 daysPostoperative: 2 monthsPostoperative: 6 months
Ketorolac1.72.10.60.4
Placebo1.62.50.20.1

[back to top]

Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory

Pain was assessed 2 days, and 2 and 6 months after surgery using a validated questionnaire to assess the degree of neuropathic characteristics of pain. This is termed the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory which is scored 0-100 with 100 being the worst possible pain. (NCT00621530)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Postoperative: 2 daysPostoperative: 2 monthsPostoperative: 6 months
Ketorolac132.92.4
Placebo214.51.4

[back to top]

McGill Pain Intensity

Pain was assessed 2 days and 2 and 6 months after surgery using a validated questionnaire wherein subjects rate the degree to which adjectives describe the intensity of their pain experience. This is termed the McGill Pain Intensity Score and is scored from 0 to 33 with 33 being the highest pain intensity. (NCT00621530)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Postoperative: 2 daysPostoperative: 2 monthsPostoperative: 6 months
Ketorolac112.31.4
Placebo103.11.2

[back to top]

McGill Affective Pain

Pain was assessed 2 days, and 2 and 6 months after surgery using a validated questionnaire wherein subjects rate the degree to which adjectives describe the emotional component of their pain experience. This is termed the McGill Pain Affective Score and is scored from 0 to 12 with 12 being the highest pain emotional impact. (NCT00621530)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Postoperative: 2 daysPostoperative: 2 monthsPostoperative: 6 months
Ketorolac2.30.40.1
Placebo2.30.50.4

[back to top]

Area of Hypersensitivity to Mechanical Stimuli Surrounding the Wound 48 Hours After Surgery

Hyperalgesia (using a von Frey filament) and allodynia (using a cotton swab) were evaluated around the surgical site 48 hours after surgery. (NCT00621530)
Timeframe: 48 hours

Interventionarea in centimeters squared (Median)
Ketorolac0
Placebo0

[back to top]

PATIENT SATISFACTION

"Patient's overall satisfaction was measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale ranges from 1-10, 1 indicating least satisfied and 10 indication very well satisfied." (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 48 hours afetr surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac8.5
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine8.5

[back to top]

NAUSEA

"The severity of nausea was measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS scale ranges from 1-10, 1 meaning minimally nauseous and 10 meaning maximally nauseous." (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 48 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac0.3
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine0.4

[back to top]

NAUSEA

"The severity of nausea was measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS scale ranges from 1-10, 1 meaning minimally nauseous and 10 meaning maximally nauseous." (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 1 hour after surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac0.6
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine0.9

[back to top]

Morphine Equivalents Utilization

Utilization of morphine and morpine equivalents for rescue analgesia was reviewed and calculated in milligrams. (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 1 hour after surgery

Interventionmiliigrams (Mean)
Ketorolac6.3
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine4

[back to top]

Morphine Equivalents

Utilization of morphine and morphine equivalents for rescue analgesia, was reviewed and calculated in milligrams. (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 48 hours afetr surgery

Interventionmilligrams (Mean)
Ketorolac4.2
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine4.6

[back to top]

Morphine Equivalents

Utilization of morphine and morphine equivalents for rescue analgesia was reviewed and calculated in milligrams. (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 12 hours after surgery

Interventionmilligrams (Mean)
Ketorolac2.1
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine1.5

[back to top]

DROWSINESS

"The severity of drowsiness was measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS scale ranges from 1-10, 1 meaning minimally drowsy and 10 meaning maximally drowsy." (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 48 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac0.6
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine0.1

[back to top]

DROWSINESS

"The severity of drowsiness was measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS scale ranges from 1-10, 1 meaning minimally drowsy and 10 meaning maximally drowsy." (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 1 hour after surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac4
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine4.4

[back to top]

PATIENT SATISFACTION

"Patient's overall satisfaction was measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale ranges from 1-10, 1 indicating least satisfied and 10 indication very well satisfied." (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 1 hour after surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac5.4
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine4.9

[back to top]

Pain Scores on Movement

"Pain scores on movement were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at the end of 6 hours. This scale measures the severity of pain and ranges from 1-10, 1 being minimal pain intensity and 10 being maximal pain intensity." (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 6 hours after surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac5.7
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine26.2

[back to top]

Pain Scores on Coughing

"Pain scores on coughing were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale measures the severity of pain and ranges from 1-10, 1 being minimal pain intensity and 10 being maximal pain intensity." (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 48 hours after surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac3.4
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine2.8

[back to top]

Pain Scores on Coughing

"Pain scores on coughing were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at the end of 6 hours after surgery. This scale measures the severity of pain and ranges from 1-10, 1 being minimal pain intensity and 10 being maximal pain intensity." (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 6 hours after surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac5.3
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine6.2

[back to top]

Pain Scores at Rest

"Patients report pain scores at rest using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale measures the severity of pain and ranges from from 1-10, 1 being minimal pain intensity and 10 being maximal pain intensity." (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 1 hour after the surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac6.7
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine6.2

[back to top]

Pain Scores at Rest

"Pain scores at rest were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at the end of 48 hours. This scale measures the severity of pain and ranges from 1-10, 1 being minimal pain intensity and 10 being maximal pain intensity." (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 48 hours after surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac1.4
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine1.6

[back to top]

Pain Score on Coughing

"Pain scores on coughing were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at the end of 48 hours. This scale measures the severity of pain and ranges from 1-10, 1 being minimal pain intensity and 10 being maximal pain intensity." (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 1 hour after the surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac7.6
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine7.5

[back to top]

Pain Score at Rest

"Patients report pain scores at rest using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale measures the severity of pain and ranges from 1-10, 1 being minimal pain intensity and 10 being maximal pain intensity." (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: At the end of 6 hours after surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac3.6
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine4.4

[back to top]

Pain on Movement

"Pain scores on movement were measured 48 hours after surgery using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale measures the severity of pain and ranges from 1-10, 1 being minimal pain intensity and 10 being maximal pain intensity." (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 48 hours afetr surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac3.1
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine2.5

[back to top]

Pain on Movement

"Pain scores on movement was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale measures the severity of pain and ranges from 1-10, 1 being minimal pain intensity and 10 being maximal pain intensity." (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 1 hour after surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac7.7
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine7.3

[back to top]

VOMITING

Data on number of episodes of vomiting was obtained, 6 hours after the surgery. The number of episodes were reported in numerical values, the lower numbers indicating fewer episodes and the higher numbers indicating more number of episodes of vomiting. (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 6 hours after surgery

InterventionEPISODES (Mean)
Ketorolac0.2
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine0.1

[back to top]

VOMITING

Data on number of episodes of vomiting was obtained, 12 hours after the surgery. The number of episodes were reported in numerical values, the lower numbers indicating fewer episodes and the higher numbers indicating more number of episodes of vomiting. (NCT00638508)
Timeframe: 12 hours

InterventionEPISODES (Mean)
Ketorolac0
Ketorolac With Ropivacaine0

[back to top]

Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) Concentration

Concentration of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) 2.5 hours post injection of intrathecal ketorolac (NCT00693160)
Timeframe: 2.5 hours

Interventionpicograms per milliliter (Mean)
Intrathecal Ketorolac87
Placebo Intrathecal Injection75

[back to top]

Hyperalgesia

Total Area of hypersensitivity (measured in centimeters) were assessed approximately 24 hours post intrathecal ketorolac injection by the method of using a von Frey filament (NCT00693160)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventioncentimeters^2 (Mean)
Intrathecal Ketorolac70.1
Placebo Intrathecal Injection48.4

[back to top]

Pain 'Right Now'

Visual analog scale score for pain on a scale from 0 = None to 10 = Worst. (NCT00765128)
Timeframe: 24 hours after the end of surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac1.0
Placebo0.9

[back to top]

Morphine Equivalents of Concomitant Pain Medication

The morphine equivalent is a unit of measure to compare the efficacy of different types of opioids (narcotics). The patients were allowed to take additional pain medication in addition to either study drug or placebo. This outcome measure reports the amount of morphine (in mg) equivalent to the amount of concomitant pain medication used by the patient. (NCT00765128)
Timeframe: 24 hours after the end of surgery

Interventionmg (Mean)
Ketorolac15
Placebo10

[back to top]

Pain 'Right Now'

Visual analog scale score for pain on a scale from 0 = None to 10 = Worst. (NCT00765232)
Timeframe: 24 hours after the end of surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac2.4
Placebo3.1

[back to top]

Morphine Equivalents of Concomitant Pain Medication

The morphine equivalent is a unit of measure to compare the efficacy of different types of opioids (narcotics). The patients were allowed to take additional pain medication in addition to either study drug or placebo. This outcome measure reports the amount of morphine (in mg) equivalent to the amount of concomitant pain medication used by the patient. (NCT00765232)
Timeframe: 24 hours after the end of surgery

Interventionmg (Mean)
Ketorolac65
Placebo69

[back to top]

Mean Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) Aqueous Humor Levels

The mean level of PGE2 (a naturally occurring prostaglandin E2 in the eye that can cause inflammation and other complications) in the aqueous humor (the thin, watery fluid in the eye) 2 days following peripheral iridotomy (ocular surgery). (NCT00791323)
Timeframe: Day 3

InterventionPicograms per milliliter (pg/ml) (Mean)
Ketorolac 0.4%1027.4
Soothe® XP1014.7

[back to top]

Time to First i.v. Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) Morphine Request

(NCT00868348)
Timeframe: within 48 hours after surgery

Interventionmin (Median)
Control223
Ketorolac490

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Scores During Walking

Pain intensity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (VAS; 0, no pain, and 100 mm, worst pain possible) (NCT00868348)
Timeframe: 6-24 hours postoperatively

Interventionmm (Median)
Control64
Ketorolac29

[back to top]

Pain Intensity During Daily Activity

Pain intensity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (VAS; 0, no pain, and 100 mm, worst pain possible) (NCT00868348)
Timeframe: 16 weeks after surgery

Interventionmm (Median)
Control4
Ketorolac3

[back to top]

Morphine Consumption

Consumption of intravenous (i.v.) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine during the first forty-eight hours after surgery (NCT00868348)
Timeframe: 48 hours after surgery

Interventionmg (Median)
Control48.75
Ketorolac10

[back to top]

Length of Hospital Stay

(NCT00868348)
Timeframe: From the day of surgery until discharge

Interventiondays (Median)
Control3
Ketorolac3

[back to top]

Home Readiness

Ability to meet discharge criteria (home readiness) (NCT00868348)
Timeframe: time to fulfilment of discharge criteria

Interventiondays (Median)
Control3
Ketorolac2

[back to top]

Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia(PCA) Consumption During 24 Hours After Surgery

Fentanyl based PCA consumption via PCA pump (microgram) (NCT00901628)
Timeframe: 24 hours postoperative

Interventionmicrogram (Mean)
Periarticular Injection Group169.4
No Injection Group262.3

[back to top]

Maximal Flexion Angle Degree on Postoperative 7 Day

An independent investigator measured the maximal flexion angle (degree) of replaced knee with 28 centimeter armed goniometer on postoperative 7 day (NCT00901628)
Timeframe: postoperative 7 day

Interventiondegree (Mean)
Periarticular Injection Group92.3
No Injection Group95.2

[back to top]

Pain( Visual Analog Scale )

An independent investigator who was blinded to randomization assessed pain level using 0 to 10 visual analog scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain)at the night after operation. (NCT00901628)
Timeframe: the night after surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Periarticular Injection Group2.3
No Injection Group6.4

[back to top]

Participant Number of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting During 24 Hours After Surgery

An independent investigator assessed participant number of postoperative nausea and vomiting during 24 hours after surgery. Nausea was defined as a subjective unpleasant sensation associated with awareness of the urge to vomit; and vomiting, as the forceful expulsion of gastric contents from the mouth. (NCT00901628)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Periarticular Injection Group22
No Injection Group15

[back to top]

the Proportion of Patients Who Were Satisfied With the Pain Management

(NCT00901628)
Timeframe: postoperative 7 day

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Periarticular Injection Group38
No Injection Group39

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients Who Could Raise Leg With Replaced Knee Extended

(NCT00901628)
Timeframe: 24 hours postoperative

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Periarticular Injection Group18
No Injection Group6

[back to top]

Intraocular Inflammation

The count of patients with inflammation defined as anterior chamber cells was measured in each study arm. (NCT00981435)
Timeframe: Up to week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Artificial Tears0
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory0
Steroid0

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Change

IOP will be measured before and at 6 and 12 weeks after intervention using Goldman tonometry. (NCT00981435)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Artificial Tears-3.0
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory-6.2
Steroid-5.2

[back to top]

Peak Aqueous Penetration

(NCT01001806)
Timeframe: day 4 of treatment

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Acuvail688.87
Xibrom67.64
Nevanac447.1

[back to top]

Change in Pain Score

At baseline at at 60 minutes, all patients were asked to describe their pain on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 representing no pain and 10 the worst imaginable. The primary outcome is the 60 minute score subtracted from the baseline score (NCT01011673)
Timeframe: Baseline, 60 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac3.8
Metoclopramide5.1

[back to top]

Satisfaction Scores

"24 hours after the emergency department visit, patients were asked, The next time you come to the Er with this type of headache, do you want to receive the same medication? Affirmative answers are tabulated here." (NCT01011673)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ketorolac45
Metoclopramide53

[back to top]

Aqueous PGE2 Inhibition

A spectroscopic quantification of PGE2 was performed on the aqueous humor samples collected with the results measured in pg/ml. PGE2 levels below 50 pg/ml were considered below the level of detection. (NCT01021761)
Timeframe: Day 4 of treatment

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Xibrom288.7
Nevanac320.4
Acuvail224.8

[back to top]

Anterior Chamber Inflammation (Flare)

Anterior chamber flare measured by assessing the number of inflammatory cells in the anterior chamber. (NCT01023724)
Timeframe: Day 14 of treatment

Interventionphoton count per msec (pc/ms) (Mean)
Xibrom24.48
Acuvail21.93

[back to top]

Number of Narcotic Pills and Morphine Sulfate Used

Pill Count (NCT01242644)
Timeframe: Post surgery day 1

InterventionNumber of pills (Mean)
Pain Pump , Injectable Medication3.41
Saline Pain Pump , Injectable Medication3.8
Injectable Medication Only3.8

[back to top]

Pain Scale

"Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between no pain and worst pain. no pain on the left end (0 cm) of the scale and the worst pain on the right end of the scale (10 cm)." (NCT01242644)
Timeframe: 72 hours post surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pain Pump , Injectable Medication3.3
Saline Pain Pump , Injectable Medication4.05
Injectable Medication Only3.13

[back to top]

Number of Narcotic Pills and Morphine Sulfate Used

(NCT01242644)
Timeframe: Post surgery day 2

InterventionNumber of pills (Mean)
Pain Pump , Injectable Medication1.1
Saline Pain Pump , Injectable Medication1.5
Injectable Medication Only0.8

[back to top]

Number of Narcotic Pills and Morphine Sulfate Used

(NCT01242644)
Timeframe: Post surgery day 3

Interventionnumber of pills (Mean)
Pain Pump , Injectable Medication2.1
Saline Pain Pump , Injectable Medication2.7
Injectable Medication Only1.7

[back to top]

Number of Narcotic Pills and Morphine Sulfate Used

Pill count (NCT01242644)
Timeframe: In recovery room

InterventionPills (Mean)
Pain Pump , Injectable Medication2.2
Saline Pain Pump , Injectable Medication1.8
Injectable Medication Only1.3

[back to top]

Pain Scale

"Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between no pain and worst pain. no pain on the left end (0 cm) of the scale and the worst pain on the right end of the scale (10 cm)." (NCT01242644)
Timeframe: 24 hours post surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pain Pump , Injectable Medication1.75
Saline Pain Pump , Injectable Medication3.23
Injectable Medication Only3.06

[back to top]

Pain Scale

"Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between no pain and worst pain. no pain on the left end (0 cm) of the scale and the worst pain on the right end of the scale (10 cm)." (NCT01242644)
Timeframe: 48 hours post-surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pain Pump , Injectable Medication1.81
Saline Pain Pump , Injectable Medication3.17
Injectable Medication Only2.26

[back to top]

Pain Score 8 Hours Post-operativley

"Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between no pain and worst pain. no pain on the left end (0 cm) of the scale and the worst pain on the right end of the scale (10 cm)." (NCT01242644)
Timeframe: 8 hours post surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pain Pump , Injectable Medication2.5
Saline Pain Pump , Injectable Medication1.8
Injectable Medication Only1.06

[back to top]

Peripheral Volume of Distribution for S- and R+ Ketorolac in 2-6 Month Old Infants

peripheral volume of distribution for ketorolac stereo-isomers determined by population kinetic analysis (NONMEM) (NCT01260883)
Timeframe: 24 hours post surgery

Interventionml (Mean)
S- Ketorolac Volume Distribution, Peripheral341
R+ Ketorolac Volume Distribution, Peripheral658

[back to top]

Percent Time With Room Air Oximetry Saturations Under 90% in 2-6 Month Infants

continuous oximetry monitoring of room air saturation was collected for 12 hours after intravenous infusion of ketorolac or placebo (NCT01260883)
Timeframe: 12 hours after ketorolac or placebo infusion

Interventionpercentage of time in 12 h after drug (Median)
Ketorolac 1 or 0.5 mg/kgNA
PlaceboNA

[back to top]

Morphine Use in 2-6 Month Old Infants Given Ketorolac or Placebo Following Surgery

total morphine given intravenously in the 12 hours following receiving intravenous ketorolac or placebo (NCT01260883)
Timeframe: first day after surgery

Interventionmg/kg (Mean)
Ketorolac 1 or 0.5 mg/kg0.12
Placebo0.08

[back to top]

Ketorolac Stereo-isomer Volume of Distribution Peripheral in 6-18 Month Old Infants

population-based analysis of ketorolac stereo-isomers (NCT01260883)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventionml (Mean)
S- Ketorolac Volume Distribution, Peripheral224
R+ Ketorolac Volume Distribution, Peripheral828

[back to top]

Half-life of S- and R+ Ketorolac in 2-6 Month Old Infants

half-life calculated from non-compartmental analysis of ketorolac isomers in 2-6 month old infants given intravenous ketorolac following surgery (NCT01260883)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventionmin (Mean)
S- Ketorolac Half-life67
R+ Ketorolac Half-life197

[back to top]

Half-life of Ketorolac Stereo-isomers in 6-18 Month Old Infants After Surgery

noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis of ketorolac stereo-isomers after intravenous infusion in postoperative infants (NCT01260883)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventionmin (Mean)
S- Ketorolac Half-life50.1
R+ Ketorolac Half-life238

[back to top]

Clearance of S-ketorolac and R+ Ketorolac in 2-6 Month Old Infants Following Surgery

stereo-isomer specific clearance determined by population-based pharmacokinetic analysis (NONMEM) (NCT01260883)
Timeframe: 24 hours following surgery

Interventionml/min (Mean)
S- Ketorolac Clearance30.7
R+ Ketorolac Clearance6.5

[back to top]

Clearance of S- and R+ Ketorolac in 6-18 Month Old Infants

stereo-specific ketorolac clearance by population-based analysis (NONMEM) (NCT01260883)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventionml/min (Mean)
S- Ketorolac Clearance45.3
R+ Ketorolac Clearance7.52

[back to top]

Central Volume of Distribution for S- and R+ Ketorolac in 2-6 Month Old Infants

stereo-specific ketorolac analysis using population-based analysis (NONMEM)for ketorolac given intravenously 24 hours after surgery in 2-6 month old infants (NCT01260883)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventionml (Mean)
S- Ketorolac Volume Distribution, Central1480
R+ Ketorolac Volume Distribution, Central992

[back to top]

Oximetry Saturation Under 90% After Ketorolac or Placebo Infusion in 6-18 Month Old Infants

continuous oximetry monitoring for 12 hours after ketorolac or placebo intravenous infusion in 6-18 month old infants after surgery (NCT01260883)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventionper cent time of 12 hours (Mean)
Ketorolac 1 or 0.5 mg/kg0.8
Placebo Infusion1

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution for Ketorolac Isomers in 6-18 Month Old Infants

population-based kinetic analysis of ketorolac isomers following intravenous infusion in infants after surgery (NCT01260883)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventionml (Mean)
S- Ketorolac Volume Distribution Central2320
R+ Ketorolac Volume Distribution Central1200

[back to top]

Total Morphine Use in 6-18 Month Old Infants After Ketorolac or Placebo Intravenous Infusion After Surgery

total amount of morphine given for 12 hours after ketorolac or placebo infusion in 6-18 month old infants after surgery (NCT01260883)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventionmg/kg (Mean)
Ketorolac 1 or 0.5 mg/kg1.8
Placebo Infusion2.2

[back to top]

Adverse Event

% who report any adverse event after administration of investigational medication (NCT01267864)
Timeframe: 24 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Metoclopramide24
Ketorolac33
Valproate25

[back to top]

Satisfaction With Medication

% who answer the following question affirmatively at 24 hours: Do you want to receive the same medication the next time you present to an ER with an acute migraine (NCT01267864)
Timeframe: 24 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Metoclopramide65
Ketorolac42
Valproate28

[back to top]

Headache Pain Level on a 0-10 Verbal Scale

Verbal Numerical Rating scale for pain. Absolute change from baseline. This is a 0-10 scale on which 0= no pain and 10= the worst pain imaginable. (NCT01267864)
Timeframe: 60 minutes after receipt of medication

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Metoclopramide4.7
Ketorolac3.9
Valproate2.8

[back to top]

Participants Who Achieve Sustained Headache Freedom for 24 Hours

Number of participants achieving a pain free state within two hours and maintaining the pain free state for 24 hours after receipt of medication (NCT01267864)
Timeframe: 2- 24 hours after receipt of medication

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Metoclopramide12
Ketorolac17
Valproate4

[back to top]

Analgesic Efficacy

"percentage of patients with NRS≥4. (NRS=numeric rating scale; o quantify pain from0=no pain to 10=worst pain possible).~NRS≥4 is cosidered as suboptimal pain control worth to be treated with adjunctive analgesics. We therefore condidered the difference in percentage of patients experiencing not optimal pain control in the two groups to understand, if any, the difference in analgesic efficacy between the two drugs." (NCT01345162)
Timeframe: 4 days postherniotomy

Interventionpercentage of patients with NRS≥4 (Number)
Ketorolac26.5
Acetaminophene + Tramadol32.3

[back to top]

Total MS Use in Milligrams by PCA From 24 Hours After the Start of Dosing Through 48 Hours

(NCT01351090)
Timeframe: 8-hour intervals from 24 hours after the start of dosing through 48 hours

Interventionmg (Mean)
Ketorolac IN 10 mg28.25
Ketorolac IN 30 mg23.11
Placebo Vehicle IN32.61

[back to top]

Total MS Use in Milligrams by PCA From the Start of Dosing Through 48 Hours

(NCT01351090)
Timeframe: 8-hour intervals from the start of dosing through 48 hours

Interventionmg (Mean)
Ketorolac IN 10 mg78.66
Ketorolac IN 30 mg61.39
Placebo Vehicle IN87.87

[back to top]

Total Morphine Sulfate (MS) Use in Milligrams by Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) Through 24 Hours

(NCT01351090)
Timeframe: 8-hour intervals from the start of dosing through 24 hours

Interventionmg (Mean)
Ketorolac IN 10 mg54.32
Ketorolac IN 30 mg37.77
Placebo Vehicle IN56.45

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Scores

Ratings of Pain Intensity (PI) were made using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on which 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain possible. PID was calculated by subtracting the posttreatment score from the baseline score, where the baseline score was the PI rating made prior to the first dose of study medication. (NCT01351090)
Timeframe: 6 hours after study drug administration

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac IN 10 mg34.1
Ketorolac IN 30 mg38.9
Placebo Vehicle IN29.1

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC 0-∞)

(NCT01355588)
Timeframe: Anytime at pre-dose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hours, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours (ketorolac tromethamine only), and 24 hours (ketorolac tromethamine only) post-dose

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine9061.9
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 4% Lidocaine Hydrochloride (HCl)8694.5
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 5% Lidocaine HCl8086.8
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 6% Lidocaine HCl8677.6

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)

(NCT01355588)
Timeframe: Anytime at pre-dose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hours, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours (ketorolac tromethamine only), and 24 hours (ketorolac tromethamine only) post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
Ketorolac Tromethamine0.510
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 4% Lidocaine Hydrochloride (HCl)0.500
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 5% Lidocaine HCl0.390
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 6% Lidocaine HCl0.410

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

(NCT01355588)
Timeframe: Anytime at pre-dose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hours, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours (ketorolac tromethamine only), and 24 hours (ketorolac tromethamine only) post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine2059.6
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 4% Lidocaine Hydrochloride (HCl)1963.1
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 5% Lidocaine HCl1799.9
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 6% Lidocaine HCl2048.5

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Post-dose (AUC 0-t)

(NCT01355588)
Timeframe: Anytime at pre-dose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hours, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours (ketorolac tromethamine only), and 24 hours (ketorolac tromethamine only) post-dose

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine8440.6
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 4% Lidocaine Hydrochloride (HCl)7856.0
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 5% Lidocaine HCl7561.5
Ketorolac Tromethamine With 6% Lidocaine HCl8103.8

[back to top]

Tmin,ss (the Time to Minimum Concentration at Steady State)

PK analysis by standard model independent methods was performed by a pharmacokineticist using WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each treatment, together with the individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01363050)
Timeframe: Blood samples for determination of plasma concentration of ketorolac were taken immediately prior to each dose and every hour for 8 hours post-dose on Day 3 (morning doses)

Interventionhours (Median)
Ketorolac Tromethamine0.000

[back to top]

Tmax,ss (the Time to Maximum Concentration at Steady State)

PK analysis by standard model independent methods was performed by a pharmacokineticist using WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each treatment, together with the individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01363050)
Timeframe: Blood samples for determination of plasma concentration of ketorolac were taken immediately prior to each dose and every hour for 8 hours post-dose on Day 3 (morning doses)

Interventionhours (Median)
Ketorolac Tromethamine1.000

[back to top]

Tmax (the Time to Maximum Concentration)

PK analysis by standard model independent methods was performed by a pharmacokineticist using WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each treatment, together with the individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01363050)
Timeframe: Blood samples for determination of plasma concentration of ketorolac were taken immediately prior to each dose and every hour for 8 hours post-dose on Day 1 (morning doses)

Interventionhours (Median)
Ketorolac Tromethamine1.000

[back to top]

MRT (the Mean Residence Time

PK analysis by standard model independent methods was performed by a pharmacokineticist using WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each treatment, together with the individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01363050)
Timeframe: Blood samples for determination of plasma concentration of ketorolac were taken immediately prior to each dose and every hour for 8 hours post-dose on Day 3 (morning doses)

Interventionhours (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine3.368

[back to top]

Cmin,ss (the Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration at Steady State)

PK analysis by standard model independent methods was performed by a pharmacokineticist using WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each treatment, together with the individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01363050)
Timeframe: Blood samples for determination of plasma concentration of ketorolac were taken immediately prior to each dose and every hour for 8 hours post-dose on Day 3 (morning doses)

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine367.7

[back to top]

Cmax,ss (the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration at Steady State)

PK analysis by standard model independent methods was performed by a pharmacokineticist using WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each treatment, together with the individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01363050)
Timeframe: Blood samples for determination of plasma concentration of ketorolac were taken immediately prior to each dose and every hour for 8 hours post-dose on Day 3 (morning doses)

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine1382.6

[back to top]

Cmax (the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration)

PK analysis by standard model independent methods was performed by a pharmacokineticist using WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each treatment, together with the individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01363050)
Timeframe: Blood samples for determination of plasma concentration of ketorolac were taken immediately prior to each dose and every hour for 8 hours post-dose on Day 1 (morning doses)

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine1147.9

[back to top]

AUCτ (the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval at Steady-state)

PK analysis by standard model independent methods was performed by a pharmacokineticist using WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each treatment, together with the individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01363050)
Timeframe: Blood samples for determination of plasma concentration of ketorolac were taken immediately prior to each dose and every hour for 8 hours post-dose on Day 3 (morning doses)

Interventionng*hours/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine6379.2

[back to top]

AUC 0-8h (the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 8 Hours Post-dose)

PK analysis by standard model independent methods was performed by a pharmacokineticist using WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each treatment, together with the individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01363050)
Timeframe: Blood samples for determination of plasma concentration of ketorolac were taken immediately prior to each dose and every hour for 8 hours post-dose on Day 1 (morning doses)

Interventionng*hours/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine4713.8

[back to top]

AUC 0-24 (the AUC From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose

Pharmacokinetic analysis by standard model independent methods was performed by a pharmacokineticist using WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each dose level, together with the individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01363076)
Timeframe: All PK parameters were assessed using blood samples collected 15 minutes prior to the dose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after the dose

Interventionng•h/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (15 mg)9600.5
Ketorolac Tromethamine (30 mg)11317.2

[back to top]

AUCinf (the AUC Time From Zero to Infinity, Where Possible)

Pharmacokinetic analysis by standard model independent methods was performed by a pharmacokineticist using WinNonlin Pro. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each dose level, together with the individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. AUCinf calculated as: AUCinf = AUC(0-24) + (concentration at 24 hr/elimination constant). (NCT01363076)
Timeframe: All PK parameters were assessed using blood samples collected 15 minutes prior to the dose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after the dose

Interventionng•h/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (15 mg)10590.7
Ketorolac Tromethamine (30 mg)11949.5

[back to top]

AUClast (the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Timepoint Post-dose)

Pharmacokinetic analysis by standard model independent methods was performed by a pharmacokineticist using WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each dose level, together with the individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01363076)
Timeframe: All PK parameters were assessed using blood samples collected 15 minutes prior to the dose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after the dose

Interventionng•h/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (15 mg)9308.2
Ketorolac Tromethamine (30 mg)10662.1

[back to top]

MRT (Mean Residence Time)

Pharmacokinetic analysis by standard model independent methods was performed by a pharmacokineticist using WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each dose level, together with the individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01363076)
Timeframe: All PK parameters were assessed using blood samples collected 15 minutes prior to the dose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after the dose

Interventionhr (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (15 mg)9.664
Ketorolac Tromethamine (30 mg)6.727

[back to top]

Cmax (the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration)

Pharmacokinetic analysis by standard model independent methods was performed by a pharmacokineticist using WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each dose level, together with the individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01363076)
Timeframe: All PK parameters were assessed using blood samples collected 15 minutes prior to the dose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after the dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (15 mg)1153.9
Ketorolac Tromethamine (30 mg)1625.3

[back to top]

Tmax (The Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration; ie. The Time at Which Cmax Occured)

Pharmacokinetic analysis by standard model independent methods was performed by a pharmacokineticist using WinNonlin Pro. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each dose level, together with the individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. Individual plasma ketorolac concentrations were summarized by dose level for the PK population at each sampling time using n, arithmetic mean, SD, CV(%), geometric mean, 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the arithmetic mean, median, minimum, and maximum. (NCT01363076)
Timeframe: All PK parameters were assessed using blood samples collected 15 minutes prior to the dose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after the dose

Interventionhr (Median)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (15 mg)0.720
Ketorolac Tromethamine (30 mg)0.780

[back to top]

t1/2 (the Terminal Half-life, Where Possible)

Pharmacokinetic analysis by standard model independent methods was performed by a pharmacokineticist using WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each dose level, together with the individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01363076)
Timeframe: All PK parameters were assessed using blood samples collected 15 minutes prior to the dose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after the dose

Interventionhr (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (15 mg)6.678
Ketorolac Tromethamine (30 mg)5.031

[back to top]

MRT (the Mean Residence Time of Ketorolac Tromethamine, Where Possible)

(NCT01365611)
Timeframe: PK parameters were determined using the following blood sampling times: pre-dose (within 10 minutes of ketorolac tromethamine administration), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 h post administration of study drug on Days 1 and 6

Interventionhours (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Given Alone)7.05
Fluticasone Propionate + Ketorolac Tromethamine6.53

[back to top]

t1/2z (the Terminal Half-life of Ketorolac Tromethamine, Where Possible)

(NCT01365611)
Timeframe: PK parameters were determined using the following blood sampling times: pre-dose (within 10 minutes of ketorolac tromethamine administration), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 h post administration of study drug on Days 1 and 6

Interventionhours (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Given Alone)5.95
Fluticasone Propionate + Ketorolac Tromethamine5.49

[back to top]

Tmax (the Time to Maximum Concentration of Ketorolac Tromethamine)

(NCT01365611)
Timeframe: PK parameters were determined using the following blood sampling times: pre-dose (within 10 minutes of ketorolac tromethamine administration), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 h post administration of study drug on Days 1 and 6

Interventionhours (Median)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Given Alone)0.750
Fluticasone Propionate + Ketorolac Tromethamine0.750

[back to top]

AUC 0-t (the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Time Point Post-dose of Ketorolac Tromethamine).

(NCT01365611)
Timeframe: PK parameters were determined using the following blood sampling times: pre-dose (within 10 minutes of ketorolac tromethamine administration), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 h post administration of study drug on Days 1 and 6

Interventionng*hours/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Given Alone)7991
Fluticasone Propionate + Ketorolac Tromethamine7610

[back to top]

AUC Inf (the AUC From Time Zero to Infinity, Where Possible)

(NCT01365611)
Timeframe: PK parameters were determined using the following blood sampling times: pre-dose (within 10 minutes of ketorolac tromethamine administration), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 h post administration of study drug on Days 1 and 6

Interventionng*hours/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Given Alone)8970
Fluticasone Propionate + Ketorolac Tromethamine8276

[back to top]

Cmax (the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Ketorolac Tromethamine)

(NCT01365611)
Timeframe: PK parameters were determined using the following blood sampling times: pre-dose (within 10 minutes of ketorolac tromethamine administration), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 h post administration of study drug on Days 1 and 6

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Given Alone)2128
Fluticasone Propionate + Ketorolac Tromethamine1948

[back to top]

t1/2z (Terminal Half-life)

(NCT01365624)
Timeframe: Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose (15 minutes prior to ketorolac administration), 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1 hour and 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Elderly Adults ≥ 65)4.521
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Nonelderly Adults < 65)3.313

[back to top]

Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration)

(NCT01365624)
Timeframe: Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose (15 minutes prior to ketorolac administration), 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1 hour and 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Elderly Adults ≥ 65)1782.286
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Nonelderly Adults < 65)1840.111

[back to top]

Tmax (Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration)

(NCT01365624)
Timeframe: Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose (15 minutes prior to ketorolac administration), 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1 hour and 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Elderly Adults ≥ 65)0.750
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Nonelderly Adults < 65)0.750

[back to top]

AUC (Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Infinity

(NCT01365624)
Timeframe: Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose (15 minutes prior to ketorolac administration), 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1 hour and 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng*hours/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Elderly Adults ≥ 65)8794.8
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Nonelderly Adults < 65)6890.8

[back to top]

MRT (Mean Residence Time)

(NCT01365624)
Timeframe: Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose (15 minutes prior to ketorolac administration), 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1 hour and 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Elderly Adults ≥ 65)6.024
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Nonelderly Adults < 65)4.441

[back to top]

AUClast (Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Time Point Post-dose

(NCT01365624)
Timeframe: Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose (15 minutes prior to ketorolac administration), 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1 hour and 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 15 hours and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng*hours/mL (Mean)
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Elderly Adults ≥ 65)7323.5
Ketorolac Tromethamine (Nonelderly Adults < 65)6536.5

[back to top]

t1/2z (the Terminal Half-life, Where Possible)

PK analysis by standard model was performed by a pharmacokineticist using model-independent analysis methods in WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each time, together with individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01365650)
Timeframe: Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 hours post administration of ketorolac tromethamine

Interventionhours (Mean)
Single i.n. Dose of 30 mg Ketorolac Tromethamine5.583
Single i.n. Dose of Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride Followed by a5.172
Seven Days of Treatment With i.n. Fluticasone Propionate5.216

[back to top]

Tmax (the Time to Maximum Concentration)

PK analysis by standard model was performed by a pharmacokineticist using model-independent analysis methods in WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each time, together with individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01365650)
Timeframe: Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 hours post administration of ketorolac tromethamine

Interventionhours (Median)
Single i.n. Dose of 30 mg Ketorolac Tromethamine1.000
Single i.n. Dose of Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride Followed by a1.250
Seven Days of Treatment With i.n. Fluticasone Propionate0.875

[back to top]

AUC 0-∞ (the AUC From Time Zero to Infinity, Where Possible)

PK analysis by standard model was performed by a pharmacokineticist using model-independent analysis methods in WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each time, together with individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01365650)
Timeframe: Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 hours post administration of ketorolac tromethamine

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Single i.n. Dose of 30 mg Ketorolac Tromethamine9906.9
Single i.n. Dose of Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride Followed by a9959.1
Seven Days of Treatment With i.n. Fluticasone Propionate9445.4

[back to top]

AUC 0-t (the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Time Point Post-dose)

PK analysis by standard model was performed by a pharmacokineticist using model-independent analysis methods in WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each time, together with individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01365650)
Timeframe: Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 hours post administration of ketorolac tromethamine

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Single i.n. Dose of 30 mg Ketorolac Tromethamine9001.8
Single i.n. Dose of Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride Followed by a9310.3
Seven Days of Treatment With i.n. Fluticasone Propionate8794.3

[back to top]

Cmax (the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration)

PK analysis by standard model was performed by a pharmacokineticist using model-independent analysis methods in WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each time, together with individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01365650)
Timeframe: Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 hours post administration of ketorolac tromethamine

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Single i.n. Dose of 30 mg Ketorolac Tromethamine1630.223
Single i.n. Dose of Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride Followed by a1729.393
Seven Days of Treatment With i.n. Fluticasone Propionate1617.810

[back to top]

MRT (the Mean Residence Time)

PK analysis by standard model was performed by a pharmacokineticist using model-independent analysis methods in WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each time, together with individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac. (NCT01365650)
Timeframe: Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 hours post administration of ketorolac tromethamine

Interventionhours (Mean)
Single i.n. Dose of 30 mg Ketorolac Tromethamine7.241
Single i.n. Dose of Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride Followed by a6.861
Seven Days of Treatment With i.n. Fluticasone Propionate7.088

[back to top]

Efficacy of Intranasal Ketorolac on Numeric Pain Scale

Change in numeric rating scale after receiving intranasal ketorolac. 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst possible pain) (NCT01471639)
Timeframe: up to 4 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline7213042920 minutes7213042940 minutes721304291 hour721304292 hoiurs721304293 hours721304294 hours72130429
Reported Pain Score of 10Reported Pain Score of 9Reported Pain Score of 8Reported Pain Score of 7Reported Pain Score of 6Reported Pain Score of 5Reported Pain Score of 4REported Pain Score of 3Reported Pain Score of 2Reported Pain Score of 1Reported Pain Score of 0No Rating
Intranasal Ketorolac (Sprix)12
Intranasal Ketorolac (Sprix)3
Intranasal Ketorolac (Sprix)2
Intranasal Ketorolac (Sprix)6
Intranasal Ketorolac (Sprix)4
Intranasal Ketorolac (Sprix)5
Intranasal Ketorolac (Sprix)10
Intranasal Ketorolac (Sprix)0
Intranasal Ketorolac (Sprix)1
Intranasal Ketorolac (Sprix)29
Intranasal Ketorolac (Sprix)36
Intranasal Ketorolac (Sprix)37

[back to top]

Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 3 Hours With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period

(NCT01490931)
Timeframe: 3 hours post-dose

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Ketorolac Nasal Spray 31.5 mg (SPRIX)9.6

[back to top]

Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 5 Hours With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period

(NCT01490931)
Timeframe: 5 Hours post-dose

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Ketorolac Nasal Spray 31.5 mg (SPRIX)16.2

[back to top]

Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 6 Hours With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period

(NCT01490931)
Timeframe: 6 Hours post-dose

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Ketorolac Nasal Spray 31.5 mg (SPRIX)19.8

[back to top]

Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 90 Minutes With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period

(NCT01490931)
Timeframe: 90 minutes post-dose

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Ketorolac Nasal Spray 31.5 mg (SPRIX)9.6

[back to top]

Median Onset of Meaningful Pain Relief

Measure obtained using recognized double-stop watch technique. Patient is asked to depress the second stop watch when pain relief is meaningful to them. Each patient decides what meaningful relief is for them. (NCT01490931)
Timeframe: At time of depressing meaningful relief stopwatch up to 6 hours.

Interventionseconds (Median)
Ketorolac Nasal Spray 31.5 mg (SPRIX)172

[back to top]

Most Frequent Number of Days of Analgesic Dosing in Dental Implant Surgery Patients When Employing Intranasal Ketorolac as Their Pain Medication.

Self explanatory (NCT01490931)
Timeframe: Up to 5 days

Interventiondays (Number)
Ketorolac Nasal Spray 31.5 mg (SPRIX)3

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Who Reach a Level of at Least Moderate Pain by Achieving a Score of at Least 40 mm on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale Within 5 Hours After the Completion of Surgery.

(NCT01490931)
Timeframe: Up to 5 hours after last suture is placed

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ketorolac Nasal Spray 31.5 mg (SPRIX)89

[back to top]

The Median Onset of First Perceptible Pain Relief of Intranasal Ketorolac in Dental Implant Surgery Patients

Data will be obtained employing the well-described double stop watch technique (NCT01490931)
Timeframe: Censored at 6 hours

Interventionseconds (Median)
Ketorolac Nasal Spray 31.5 mg (SPRIX)86

[back to top]

Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 2 Hours With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period

(NCT01490931)
Timeframe: 2 Hours

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Ketorolac Nasal Spray 31.5 mg (SPRIX)9.1

[back to top]

Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 20 Minutes With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period.

Pain intensity scores will be recorded by patient employing a standard 100 mm visual analog scale (NCT01490931)
Timeframe: 20 minutes post dose

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Ketorolac Nasal Spray 31.5 mg (SPRIX)14.3

[back to top]

Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 60 Minutes With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period

VAS pain intensity score 60 minutes after dosing. (NCT01490931)
Timeframe: 60 minutes post dose

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Ketorolac Nasal Spray 31.5 mg (SPRIX)10.6

[back to top]

Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 4 Hours With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period

(NCT01490931)
Timeframe: 4 Hours post-dose

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Ketorolac Nasal Spray 31.5 mg (SPRIX)10.0

[back to top]

Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores at 40 Minutes With the Baseline Pain Intensity Score During the Initial 6-hour Evaluation Period.

VAS pain intensity score at 40 minutes post-dose (NCT01490931)
Timeframe: 40 minutes post dose

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Ketorolac Nasal Spray 31.5 mg (SPRIX)10.1

[back to top]

Pain Ratings

The primary endpoint was the morphine and ketorolac conditioning effects as indicated by subjective pain rating changes between pain only (a control condition with no injection of glucose, but subject's did see an image of an hour glass displaying how much time they had before receiving a painful stimulus) and pain+glucose (subjects received a glucose injection accompanied by an injection schematic followed by a painful stimulus) within the morphine and ketorolac groups. We used the Gracely pain rating scale (ranging from 0, no sensation to 20, extremely painful). (NCT01576276)
Timeframe: One day

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Morphine Condition-0.22
Ketorolac Condition-0.97

[back to top]

fMRI Signal Changes

Obtain information about brain activity, including BOLD (Blood-oxygen-level dependent) signal, using an fMRI system. Data analysis was applied using SPM 12 with a standard pipeline. (NCT01576276)
Timeframe: one day

InterventionBeta value (Mean)
morphine injection cue at operculummorphine control cue at operculumketorolac injection cue at operculumketorolac control cue at operculumketorolac injection cue at insulaketorolac control cue at insula
fMRI Signal Change0.820.43-0.020.550.090.85

[back to top]

Post-operative Nausea

End of surgery time determined by anesthesia portion of the medical record. PONV to be assessed by review of surgeons' and nurses' notes in the medical record as well as through review of patient diaries. Vomiting constitutes a safety issue and, as such, associated adverse events will be noted. (NCT01592708)
Timeframe: End of surgery to discharge from hospital

Interventionpercentage of subjects with PON (Number)
Intervention Cohort24
Comparison Cohort70

[back to top]

Post-operative Vomiting

(NCT01592708)
Timeframe: End of surgery to discharge from hospital

Interventionpercentage of subjects with POV (Number)
Intervention Cohort11
Comparison Cohort28

[back to top]

Post-discharge Vomiting

(NCT01592708)
Timeframe: 1 week post discharge

Interventionpercentage of subjects with PDV (Number)
Intervention Cohort22
Comparison Cohort29

[back to top]

Post-discharge Nausea

To be assessed based on patient diary completed daily for 1 week following discharge to home from the hospital (NCT01592708)
Timeframe: 1 week from discharge from hospital

Interventionpercentage of subjects with PDN (Number)
Intervention Cohort72
Comparison Cohort60

[back to top]

Hospital Length of Stay

Anesthesia start time determined from anesthesia portion of the medical record. Time at which discharge order was placed will serve as time of discharge. (NCT01592708)
Timeframe: Anesthesia start time to placement of hospital discharge order - average 26 - 28 hours

Interventionhours (Median)
Intervention Cohort26.4
Comparison Cohort28.2

[back to top]

Pain Scores Immediately After Cervical Dilation

21-point 0 to 100 scale where 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain (in increments of five) (NCT01595282)
Timeframe: Immediately (within 1 minute) after cervical dilation prior to the introduction of the suction cannula

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac41.6
Ibuprofen45.4

[back to top]

Pain Scores 15 Minutes Post-procedure

21-point 0 to 100 scale, where 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain (in increments of five) (NCT01595282)
Timeframe: Fifteen minutes after the procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac22.3
Ibuprofen15.0

[back to top]

Immediate Post-procedure Pain Score

The primary endpoint is subjects' immediate post-procedure pain score on a 21-point 0 to 100 scale, 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain (in increments of five). This scale has been previously validated and used for research purposes, including for pain research evaluating suction curettage elsewhere and at our institution (Jensen 1986, Williamson 2004, Allen 2009). (NCT01595282)
Timeframe: Immediately (within 1 minute) after suction and speculum removal

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac52.3
Ibuprofen56.2

[back to top]

Likert Like Pain Scale Number of Participants Who Said the Topical Eye Hurt Much More Than the Subconjunctival Eye at Time of Intravitreal Injection

The patient was asked to compare the two eyes in the way described in the study protocol on a five point scale. If one eye hurt a lot more or a little more than the other or if the two eyes were equal (neither hurt more than the other). (NCT01640171)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Topical Anesthesia 1 Eye, SC 1 Eye19

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Preferred Subconjunctival Anesthetic at the Third Follow-up Visit

Participants received anesthetic over several treatment visits. They were allowed to change there preference at each visit. The final outcome was the preference indicated at the third follow-up visit. (NCT01640171)
Timeframe: up to 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Topical Anesthesia 1 Eye, SC 1 Eye50

[back to top]

Number of Participatns With Level 10 Pain on Wong-Baker Pain Scale In Subconjunctival Eye At Time of Intravitreal Injection

Pain was rated on a 10 point standardized pain scale, zero was the least pain and 10 was the worst pain. The patient was questioned using a script and shown a pain scale as well as told how the pain scale worked. Then the patient gave the number that characterized their pain. (NCT01640171)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Topical Anesthesia 1 Eye, SC 1 Eye0

[back to top]

Measurement of the Efficacy of IV Ibuprofen for the Treatment of Postoperative Pain as Measured by the Amount of Rescue Medication in the Postoperative Period Through Discharge

Measurement of the amount of rescue medication in the postoperative period. (NCT01650519)
Timeframe: 24 hours

,
Interventionmilligrams (Mean)
NarcoticAcetaminophen
IV Ibuprofen5.4162.5
IV Ketorolac20.4325

[back to top]

Measurement of the Efficacy of IV Ibuprofen for the Treatment of Postoperative Pain as Measured by the Amount of Time to Rescue Medication in the Postoperative Period Through Discharge

Measurement of the amount of time to rescue medication in the postoperative period. (NCT01650519)
Timeframe: 24 hours

InterventionHours (Mean)
IV Ibuprofen1.7
IV Ketorolac1

[back to top]

Efficacy of IV Ibuprofen for Post-op Pain.

"Measurement of the efficacy of IV ibuprofen for the treatment of postoperative pain as measured by patient pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS) upon first possible assessment following surgery. The VAS is a continuous scale compromised of a horizontal line, one hundred millimeters in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors (No Pain, Worst Possible Pain). The VAS is self-completed by the respondent. The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance, in mm, on the 100 mm line between the No Pain anchor and the subject's mark. The score would be between o and 100." (NCT01650519)
Timeframe: first possible assessment following surgery

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
VAS at Rest (mm)VAS with Movement (mm)
IV Ibuprofen819
IV Ketorolac3441

[back to top]

Measurement of the Efficacy of IV Ibuprofen for the Treatment of Postoperative Pain as Measured by the Pain Intensity as Assess by Patient Pain Intensity (VAS) in the Post-surgical Period, Through 24 Hours

"Measurement of the efficacy of IV ibuprofen for the treatment of postoperative pain as measured by patient pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS) in the post-surgical period through 24 hours post-procedure. The VAS is a continuous scale made up of a horizontal line, 100 mm in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors (No Pain, Worst Possible Pain). The VAS is self-completed by the respondent. The subject is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance, in mm, on the 100 mm line between the No Pain anchor and the subject's mark. The score would be between 0 and 100. Subject's were contacted at 24 hour post-discharge during a follow-up phone contact and asked to completed the VAS at Rest and VAS with Movement and return both completed VAS assessments via the envelope provided. The analysis was performed on the VAS assessments returned to the study site." (NCT01650519)
Timeframe: 24 Hours

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
VAS at Rest (mm)VAS with Movement (mm)
IV Ibuprofen412
IV Ketorolac1323

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction.

"Measurement of patient satisfaction post-procedure. During the post-treatment period, subjects were asked to complete a satisfaction questionnaire (Quality of Recovery - 40 or QoR-40) defining their quality of recovery at 24 hours following surgery. The QoR - 40 is a 40-item questionnaire that provides a global score and subscores across five dimensions of quality of recovery: emotions (minimum score = 6, maximum score = 30), physical comfort (minimum score = 8, maximum score = 40), patient support (minimum score = 7, maximum score = 35), physical independence (minimum score = 5, maximum score = 25), and pain (minimum score = 7, maximum score = 35). Higher subscores represent a better outcome.~Subscores are added to create a Global QoR-40 score. Global scores range from 40 (extremely poor quality of recovery) to 200 (excellent quality of recovery)." (NCT01650519)
Timeframe: 24 hours

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
EmotionsPhysical ComfortPatient SupportPhysical IndependencePain
IV Ibuprofen20.228.330.522.29.5
IV Ketorolac20.726.929.021.310.9

[back to top]

Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).

Measurement of the incidence of serious adverse events. (NCT01650519)
Timeframe: 24 hours

InterventionNumber of Events (Number)
IV Ibuprofen0
IV Ketorolac0

[back to top]

Time to Discharge.

Measurement of the time to discharge in the postoperative period. (NCT01650519)
Timeframe: 24 hours

InterventionHours (Mean)
IV Ibuprofen1.8
IV Ketorolac1.8

[back to top]

Nulliparous Patients - Subgroup Analysis

"The patient marked their pain on a 0 to 10cm visual analogue scale, where 0 cm is no pain and 10 cm is the worst pain ever.~Prior to injection of study drug, anticipated pain~Pain from study drug injection, measured immediately after injection~Pain from speculum insertion, measured immediately after insertion~Pain with tenaculum placement, measured immediately after placement~Pain with uterine sounding, measured immediately after removal of the sound~Pain at 5 minutes after placement of the intrauterine device~Pain at 15 minutes after placement of the intrauterine device" (NCT01664559)
Timeframe: immediately after each step (see description)

,
Interventioncm (Median)
1) Anticipated pain2) Pain with injection3) Speculum insertion4) Tenaculum placement5) Uterine sounding6) Pain with IUD placement7) 5 min after placement8) 15 min after placement
Placebo With 1cc Normal Saline IM2.81.82.36.38.48.13.74.8
Toradol, 30mg in 1cc IM3.61.21.54.36.05.42.71.8

[back to top]

Pain Scores at Other Time Points During and After IUD Placement

"The patient marked their pain on a 0 to 10cm visual analogue scale, where 0 cm is no pain and 10 cm is the worst pain ever.~Prior to injection of study drug, anticipated pain~Pain from study drug injection, measured immediately after injection~Pain from speculum insertion, measured immediately after insertion~Pain with tenaculum placement, measured immediately after placement~Pain with uterine sounding, measured immediately after removal of the sound~Pain at 5 minutes after placement of the intrauterine device~Pain at 15 minutes after placement of the intrauterine device" (NCT01664559)
Timeframe: immediately after each step (see description)

,
Interventioncm (Median)
Anticipated painPain with injectionSpeculum insertionTenaculum placementUterine sounding5 min after procedure15 min after procedure
Placebo With 1cc Normal Saline IM4.41.02.63.95.02.21.6
Toradol, 30mg in 1cc IM3.50.61.52.54.30.30.1

[back to top]

VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Measurement of Pain

The patient marked their pain on a 0 to 10cm visual analogue scale, where 0 cm is no pain and 10 cm is the worst pain ever. (NCT01664559)
Timeframe: Pain with IUD placement, measured immediately after placement

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Placebo With 1cc Normal Saline IM5.2
Toradol, 30mg in 1cc IM3.6

[back to top]

Post-insertion Patient Questionnaire

"Questions assessed in multiple choice format:~Side effects~injection site pain~overall satisfaction with IUD insertion experience~would they still recommend IUD placement to a friend?~significant pain for which they desired acetaminophen prior to leaving the office?" (NCT01664559)
Timeframe: assessed at 15 minutes after IUD insertion

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Reported side effectsInjection site pain - just as bad/worse than IUDSatisfied or very satisfied with overall IUD procRecommend IUD to a friendDesires additional pain medication
Placebo With 1cc Normal Saline IM128302816
Toradol, 30mg in 1cc IM8631306

[back to top]

Post-insertion Provider Questionnaire

"The provider will be asked to fill out a multiple choice format questionnaire:~what level training are you?~which IUD was inserted?~what was the purpose of IUD placement?~what was the position of the uterus?~did the IUD placement process require cervical dilation?~were you able to complete the IUD insertion?~was there bleeding from the cervix that required more than 5 min to control?~were there any major complications with the IUD insertion?~did the patient take tylenol prior to leaving the office?" (NCT01664559)
Timeframe: Immediately after IUD placement, on average within 1 hour

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Level of training - PGY1Level of training - PGY2Level of training - PGY3Level of training - PGY4Level of training - AttendingIUD type - levonogestrelIUD type - copperPurpose of IUD - contraceptionPurpose of IUD - AUBPosition of uterus - antevertedPosition of uterus - retrovertedPosition of uterus - midpositionedCervical dilation neededAble to complete the IUD placementSignificant bleedingMajor complicationsTook acetaminophen prior to leaving the office
Placebo With 1cc Normal Saline IM22351221233119692340017
Toradol, 30mg in 1cc IM5136632823212058233207

[back to top]

Post-operative Opioid Requirements

this study will assess the effect of perioperative usage of single-dose of intranasal ketorolac on post operative opioid requirements within 3 hours after surgery. (NCT01736358)
Timeframe: 3 hours after surgery

Interventionmg (Median)
Intranasal Ketoralac27.43
Placebo30

[back to top]

Incidence of Postoperative Side Effects

To find the incidence of immediate (until discharge) and 24hrs post operative side effects in the target population. (NCT01736358)
Timeframe: 24 hours after procedure

Interventionnumber of events (Number)
Intranasal Ketoralac0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Post Operative Pain Scale

To evaluate the post operative pain score using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 2 hours after surgery. The scale for VAS is 0 is no pain to 10 being the worst pain. (NCT01736358)
Timeframe: 2 hours after surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Intranasal Ketoralac4
Placebo3

[back to top]

Post Operative Pain Score

To evaluate the post operative pain score using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 30 minutes after surgery. The scale for VAS is 0 is no pain to 10 being the worst pain. (NCT01736358)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Intranasal Ketoralac4
Placebo3.5

[back to top]

Post Operative Pain Score

To evaluate the post operative pain score using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 1 hour after surgery. The scale for VAS is 0 is no pain to 10 being the worst pain. (NCT01736358)
Timeframe: 1 hour after surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Intranasal Ketoralac3.5
Placebo4.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

2 years for the primary analysis + 3 additional years for secondary analysis (From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause assessed up to 5 years) (NCT01806259)
Timeframe: 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ketorolac 30 mg93
NaCl 0.9% 3mL105

[back to top]

Recurrence-free Survival

2 years for the primary analysis + 3 additional years for secondary analysis (From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 5 years) (NCT01806259)
Timeframe: 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ketorolac 30 mg80
NaCl 0.9% 3mL96

[back to top]

Time to Pain Relief

9) The time, in minutes, will be measured from the time study drug is taken to the time when significant pain relief is first observed and maintained through 2 hours with no rescue medication use at or prior to this point. (NCT01807234)
Timeframe: following each treated migraine attack

,,
Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
10 minutes15 minutes20 minutes30 minutes1 hour
Ketorolac Placebo/ Sumatriptan Placebo12.214.322.426.532.6
Ketorolac/ Placebo15.735.343.154.958.8
Sumatriptan/ Placebo14.336.044.953.157.1

[back to top]

Absence of Nausea

4) Defined as reduction of nausea to none. Symptom was assessed using a 4-point scale (none, mild, moderate, and severe) (NCT01807234)
Timeframe: 2-hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Ketorolac/ Placebo82.7
Sumatriptan/ Placebo74.0
Ketorolac Placebo/ Sumatriptan Placebo66.0

[back to top]

2- Hour Pain Relief

The primary outcome was 2-hour headache relief; headache relief was defined as headache pain from moderate or severe pain to none or mild pain. Pain was assessed using a 4-point scale (none, mild, moderate, and severe) (NCT01807234)
Timeframe: 2 hours

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ketorolac/ Placebo72.5
Sumatriptan/ Placebo69.4
Ketorolac Placebo/ Sumatriptan Placebo38.8

[back to top]

Absence of Allodynia

5) Absence of allodynia The presence of allodynia was assessed based on a series of 8 questions inquiring as to the presence of allodynia. Participants answering 2 or more questions positively were considered to have allodynia. (NCT01807234)
Timeframe: 2-hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Ketorolac/ Placebo70.5
Sumatriptan/ Placebo75.5
Ketorolac Placebo/ Sumatriptan Placebo69.0

[back to top]

Absence of Phonophobia

3) Defined as reduction of phonophobia to none. Symptom was assessed using a 4-point scale (none, mild, moderate, and severe) (NCT01807234)
Timeframe: 2-hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Ketorolac/ Placebo75.0
Sumatriptan/Placebo66.0
Ketorolac Placebo/ Sumatriptan Placebo56.0

[back to top]

Absence of Photophobia

2) Defined as reduction of photophobia to none. Symptom was assessed using a 4-point scale (none, mild, moderate, and severe) (NCT01807234)
Timeframe: 2-hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Ketorolac/ Placebo65.4
Sumatriptan/ Placebo64.0
Ketorolac Placebo/ Sumatriptan Placebo46.0

[back to top]

Pain Freedom

1) Pain Freedom: Pain Freedom at 2 hours is defined as being free of pain. Pain was assessed using a 4-point scale (none, mild, moderate, and severe). (NCT01807234)
Timeframe: 2-hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Ketorolac/ Placebo43.1
Sumatriptan/Placebo36.7
Ketorolac Placebo/ Sumatriptan Placebo18.4

[back to top]

Self-assessment of Disability: Percentage of Participants With Moderate or Severe Disability

Participants' self-assessment of disability was assessed using 4-point scales (none, mild, moderate, and severe). A binary outcome variable was created grouping none and mild vs moderate to severe. . (NCT01807234)
Timeframe: 2-hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Ketorolac/ Placebo1.9
Sumatriptan/ Placebo8.1
Ketorolac Placebo/ Sumatriptan Placebo10.2

[back to top]

Sustained Pain Freedom (SPF)

8) 24 and 48 hours sustained pain freedom (SPF); Defined as the reduction of pain to none. Pain was assessed using a 4-point scale (none, mild, moderate, and severe). (NCT01807234)
Timeframe: 24 and 48 hours

,,
Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
24 hour sustained pain freedom48 hour sustained pain freedom
Ketorolac Placebo/ Sumatriptan Placebo12.212.2
Ketorolac/ Placebo35.333.3
Sumatriptan/ Placebo22.418.4

[back to top]

Sustained Pain Relief (SPR)

7) 24 and 48 hours sustained pain relief (SPR) Defined as the reduction of pain to none or mild from moderate or severe, on a 4-point scale (none, mild, moderate, and severe). (NCT01807234)
Timeframe: 24 and 48 hours

,,
Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
24 hour sustained pain relief48 hour sustained pain relief
Ketorolac Placebo/ Sumatriptan Placebo20.420.4
Ketorolac/ Placebo49.049.0
Sumatriptan/ Placebo40.830.6

[back to top]

Number of Eyes With Epithelial Defects

the number of epithelial defects was evaluated by the application of fluorescein, Staining was performed with fluorescein which stained the degenerated cells and the mucus filaments present in the tear film. (NCT01871077)
Timeframe: 11 days

Interventioneyes (Number)
PRO-1560

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

The tension of a healthy eye should be between 10 and 20 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). In Goldman-type Applying Tonometry, the cornea is flattened, and the intraocular pressure is determined by measuring the force of application and the flattened area. (NCT01871077)
Timeframe: 11 days

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
basal visitFinal visit
PRO-15612.6012.23

[back to top]

Visual Acuity (VA)

"The VA will be evaluated basally, without refractive correction with the Snellen chart. A Snellen chart is placed at a standard distance: 20 ft. At this distance, the symbols on the line representing normal acuity subtend. This line, designated 20/20 is the smallest line that a person with normal acuity can read at a distance of 20fs. the scale consists of 11 lines of letters of different size, the size of the letter gives a fractional value according to the visual acuity of the patient, the value is inversely proportional to the visual acuity, if the denominator is greater the visual acuity will be less.~Line 1: 20/200 Line 2: 20/100, Line 3: 20/70, line 4: 20/50, line 5: 20/40, Line 6: 20/30, line 7: 20/25, Line 8: 20/20, line 9: 20/15, line 10: 20/13, line 11: 20/10.~the results will be expressed as the mean of the denominator of the Snellen scale (scale 20/--) example. 18.5 ± 1.5, that means the final result is 20/18.5 ± 1.5" (NCT01871077)
Timeframe: 11 days

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
basal visitFinal visit
PRO-15619.919.83

[back to top]

Number of Cases With Adverse Events

The presence of adverse events was evaluated by the number of cases. (NCT01871077)
Timeframe: 11 days

Interventioncases (Number)
PRO-1566

[back to top]

Time to First Use of Rescue Med Will be Measured

Time to first rescue medication (in hours) in the postoperative period through discharge. (NCT01901393)
Timeframe: Post-operative period until discharge, an expected average of 6 hours

Interventionhours (Mean)
IV Ibuprofen1.2
Ketorolac1.2

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction

Measured using 2 question, 4 point scale. (NCT01901393)
Timeframe: Post-operative period until discharge, an expected average of 6 hours

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
PoorFairGoodExcellent
IV Ibuprofen042026
Ketorolac181822

[back to top]

Rescue Medication Use in Post-operative Period

Amount of rescue medication (in milligrams) will be measured (NCT01901393)
Timeframe: Post-operative period until discharge, an expected average of 6 hours

,
Interventionmilligrams (Mean)
NarcoticAcetaminophen
IV Ibuprofen13.7188.5
Ketorolac13.2179.1

[back to top]

Efficacy of Pain Relief (Pain Intensity at Rest)

"Pain assessed using VAS (Visual Analog Scale, VAS). The VAS is a continuous scale compromised of a horizontal line, one hundred millimeters in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors (No Pain, Worst Possible Pain). The VAS is self-completed by the respondent. The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance, in mm, on the 100 mm line between the No Pain anchor and the subject's mark. The score would be between 0 (No Pain) and 100 (Worst Possible Pain)." (NCT01901393)
Timeframe: First possible time post-surgery, an expected average of 6 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (in mm) (Mean)
IV Ibuprofen30
Ketorolac32

[back to top]

Efficacy of Pain Relief (Pain Intensity With Movement)

"Pain assessed using VAS (Visual Analog Scale, VAS). The VAS is a continuous scale compromised of a horizontal line, one hundred millimeters in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors (No Pain, Worst Possible Pain). The VAS is self-completed by the respondent. The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance, in mm, on the 100 mm line between the No Pain anchor and the subject's mark. The score would be between 0 (No Pain) and 100 (Worst Possible Pain)." (NCT01901393)
Timeframe: First possible time post-surgery, an expected average of 6 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (in mm) (Mean)
IV Ibuprofen32
Ketorolac41

[back to top]

Incidence of Serious Adverse Events

Number of subjects experiencing treatment-emergent serious adverse events (NCT01901393)
Timeframe: Post-operative period until discharge, an expected average of 6 hours

InterventionNumber of events (Number)
IV Ibuprofen0
Ketorolac0

[back to top]

The Incidence of Postoperative Sore Throat(POST) Using Ketorolac and Dexamethasone in Womend After Thyroidectomy

"The investigator asked scales to patients at 1, 6 and 24h after extubation. POST was defined as discomfort at larynx or pharynx at rest and during swallowing after surgery and was assessed using a 4-grade scale (0-3) based on verbal responses to questions: 0, none; 1, mild (less severe than with a cold); 2, moderate (similar with a cold); 3 severe (more severe than with a cold)~● Incidence of sore throat : if patient rates sore throat scale more than 1, investigator will record as positive symptom." (NCT02039427)
Timeframe: at 1, 6 and 24 hours after thyroidectomy

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sore throat Rest at 1hSore throat Rest at 6hSore throat Rest at 24hSore throat Swallowing at 1hSore throat Swallowing at 6hSore throat Swallowing at 24h
Dexamethasone412515423529
Placebo433220444442
Postketorolac423325444037
Preketorolac443421454237

[back to top]

Potential Side Effects Associated With the Study Drugs

Potential side effects associated with the study drugs, such as anlgesic use, nausea and vomiting. (NCT02039427)
Timeframe: at 1, 6 and 24 hours after extubation

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Analgesic use at 1hAnalgesic use at 6hAnalgesic use at 24hNausea at 1hNausea at 6hNausea at 24hVomiting at 1hVomiting at 6hVomiting at 24h
Dexamethasone9001510100
Placebo14211020000
Postketorolac6001362110
Preketorolac4001171220

[back to top]

The Incidence of Postoperative Hoarseness(PH) Using Ketorolac and Dexamethasone in Womend After Thyroidectomy

"The investigator asked scales to patients at 1, 6 and 24h after extubation. PH was assessed using a 4-grade scale (0-3): 0, none; 1, mild (noticed by the patient only); 2, severe (obvious to observer); 3 aphonia (silence of voice)~● Incidence of hoarseness: If patient exhibit hoarseness scale more than 1, investigator will record as positive sign" (NCT02039427)
Timeframe: at 1, 6 and 24 hours after thyroidectomy

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hoarseness at 1hHoarseness at 6hHoarseness at 24h
Dexamethasone403522
Placebo423734
Postketorolac403929
Preketorolac443628

[back to top]

Adverse Effect of Nausea

The number of study patients who reported nausea after administration of medication (NCT02078492)
Timeframe: 120 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 1 - 10 mg of Ketorolac9
Group 2 - 15mg11
Group 3 - 30mg8

[back to top]

Adverse Effect of Headache

The number of study patients who reported headache after administration of medication (NCT02078492)
Timeframe: 120 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 1 - 10 mg of Ketorolac8
Group 2 - 15mg2
Group 3 - 30mg3

[back to top]

Adverse Effect of Dizziness

the number of study patients who reported having dizziness after administration of medication. (NCT02078492)
Timeframe: 120 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 1 - 10 mg of Ketorolac14
Group 2 - 15mg16
Group 3 - 30mg12

[back to top]

Pain Score at 30 Minutes

Pain score of each group at 30 minutes. The Numeric Rating Pain (NRS) scale was used for the study. The NRS ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very severe pain). A score of 5 is moderate pain. The higher the pain score the higher the pain severity. (NCT02078492)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

Interventionpain score (Mean)
Group 1 - 10 mg of Ketorolac5.14
Group 2 - 15mg5.05
Group 3 - 30mg4.81

[back to top]

Total Morphine Dosage

Total dose of morphine used will be recorded for each patient. (NCT02112448)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionmg/kg (Mean)
Continuous Infusion0.9
As Needed Dosing0.23

[back to top]

Length of Stay

Length of stay will be recorded for each subject. (NCT02112448)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause or discharge, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months

Interventiondays (Mean)
As Needed Dosing4.9
Continuous Infusion8.4

[back to top]

PACU Opiate Consumption

Total PACU opioid consumption measured in intravenous morphine mg equivalents (IV MME). (NCT02181426)
Timeframe: Less than 1 day (PACU stay in the postoperative period)

InterventionIV Morphine Equivalents (mg) (Mean)
0 mg of Ketorolac7.7
7.5 mg of Ketorolac6.3
15 mg Ketorolac6.5
30 mg Ketorolac5.0

[back to top]

Post-Operative Pain Score

Pain intensity (NRS) assessment at 3 month follow-up. Pain was measured on an ascending numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0-10 where 1-3 equaled mild pain, 4-6 equaled moderate pain, 7-9 equaled severe pain, and 10 equaled worst possible pain. (NCT02242201)
Timeframe: 3 month follow-up

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Pain at restPain with movement
PAI Liposomal Bupivacaine01
PAI Ropivacaine01
PNB Bupivacaine00

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting Complications Since Surgery

Complications were collected by telephone interview after surgery. (NCT02242201)
Timeframe: Post-operative Day 1 Through 3 - Month Follow-up

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Operative extremity neurologic changesWound infectionFall requiring medical attention
PAI Liposomal Bupivacaine211
PAI Ropivacaine112
PNB Bupivacaine101

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting a NRS Pain Score Greater Than 3

Pain was measured on an ascending numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0-10 where 1-3 equaled mild pain, 4-6 equaled moderate pain, 7-9 equaled severe pain, and 10 equaled worst possible pain. (NCT02242201)
Timeframe: 3 month follow up

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pain at restPain with movement
PAI Liposomal Bupivacaine12
PAI Ropivacaine14
PNB Bupivacaine00

[back to top]

Total Opioid Consumption During Hospitalization

Measured in daily oral morphine equivalents (OME) (NCT02242201)
Timeframe: Preoperative, Intraoperative, Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU), Post Operative Day (POD) 0, day 1, and day 2

,,
InterventionOral morphine equivalent in milligrams (Median)
PreoperativeIntraoperativePostanesthesia Care Unit (PACU)Post Operative Day (POD) 0 post PACUPOD 1POD 2
PAI Liposomal Bupivacaine1510011.31511.3
PAI Ropivacaine151001533.815
PNB Bupivacaine151007.522.515

[back to top]

Change in Unipedal Stance Time

Length of time in seconds a patient could stand on involved leg (NCT02242201)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

,,
Interventionseconds (Median)
Baseline3 months
PAI Liposomal Bupivacaine3030
PAI Ropivacaine3030
PNB Bupivacaine24.530

[back to top]

Maximum Postoperative Pain Score

Pain was measured on an ascending numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0-10 where 1-3 equaled mild pain, 4-6 equaled moderate pain, 7-9 equaled severe pain, and 10 equaled worst possible pain. (NCT02242201)
Timeframe: Post-Operative Day 1 (0600-1200)

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
PNB Bupivacaine3.0
PAI Ropivacaine4.0
PAI Liposomal Bupivacaine3.0

[back to top]

Hospital Length of Stay

Discharge readiness was evaluated by the surgical team during morning and afternoon physical therapy sessions. (NCT02242201)
Timeframe: Post-operative Day 1 through discharge (approximately 3 days)

Interventiondays (Median)
PNB Bupivacaine2
PAI Ropivacaine2
PAI Liposomal Bupivacaine2

[back to top]

Change in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Quality of Life Physical Component

Scores on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36). Subjects completed the SF-36 which consists of 8 sub-scales ranging from 0 to 100, with (0 = worst imaginable, 100 = best imaginable). (NCT02242201)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PNB Bupivacaine12.5
PAI Ropivacaine12.6
PAI Liposomal Bupivacaine12.3

[back to top]

Change in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Quality of Life Mental Component

Scores on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36). Subjects completed the SF-36 which consists of 8 sub-scales ranging from 0 to 100, with (0 = worst imaginable, 100 = best imaginable). (NCT02242201)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PNB Bupivacaine2.2
PAI Ropivacaine2.6
PAI Liposomal Bupivacaine3.0

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EQVAS Score

The EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection82.79
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection82.56

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EQVAS Score

The EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection90.25
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection75.79

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EQVAS Score

The EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection82.17
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection81.61

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EQVAS Score

The EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection82.07
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection82.30

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores

The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection21.04
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection25.90

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores

The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection23.61
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection21.88

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores

The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection28.56
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection27.38

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: Quinnell Grading Scores

The Quinnell grading system monitors for trigger symptom improvement with a range of 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum) with a higher number corresponding to worse symptoms: 0-normal movement of finger; 1-uneven movement; 2-active correctible locking of digit; 3-passively correctible locking; 4-fixed deformity. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection1.14
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection0.67

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: Quinnell Grading Scores

The Quinnell grading system monitors for trigger symptom improvement with a range of 0 (minumum) to 4 (maximum) with a higher number corresponding to worse symptoms: 0-normal movement of finger; 1-uneven movement; 2-active correctible locking of digit; 3-passively correctible locking; 4-fixed deformity. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection1.13
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection1.22

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: Quinnell Grading Scores

The Quinnell grading system monitors for trigger symptom improvement with a range of 0 (minumum) to 4 (maximum) with a higher number corresponding to worse symptoms: 0-normal movement of finger; 1-uneven movement; 2-active correctible locking of digit; 3-passively correctible locking; 4-fixed deformity. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection1.37
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection1.55

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: Quinnell Grading Scores

The Quinnell grading system monitors for trigger symptom improvement with a range of 0 (minumum) to 4 (maximum) with a higher number corresponding to worse symptoms: 0-normal movement of finger; 1-uneven movement; 2-active correctible locking of digit; 3-passively correctible locking; 4-fixed deformity. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection1.63
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection1.07

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: Quinnell Grading Scores

The Quinnell grading system monitors for trigger symptom improvement with a range of 0 (minumum) to 4 (maximum) with a higher number corresponding to worse symptoms: 0-normal movement of finger; 1-uneven movement; 2-active correctible locking of digit; 3-passively correctible locking; 4-fixed deformity. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection1.67
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection1.79

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: VAS Pain Scores

VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection2.25
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection2.68

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Functional Score

The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection0.87
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection0.81

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: VAS Pain Scores

VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection1.75
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection3.07

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: VAS Pain Scores

VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection4.23
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection3.53

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: VAS Pain Scores

VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection5.41
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection4.79

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Functional Score

The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection0.76
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection0.78

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Functional Score

The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection0.88
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection0.77

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Functional Score

The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection0.77
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection0.78

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores

The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection15.65
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection28.27

[back to top]

De Quervain's Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score

VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher and worse the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection7.03
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection6.94

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Functional Score

The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection0.83
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection0.82

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores

The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection14

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score

VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher and worse the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection4

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score

VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher and worse the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection3

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score

VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher and worse the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection6

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EQVAS Score

The EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection93.50
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection83.91

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) Over Lateral Epicondyle

Clinician will examine the patient and palpate over the lateral epicondyle. Presence of pain is a positive test, recorded as 1. Absence of pain is a negative test, recorded as 0. This is done at every visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection0

[back to top]

DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score

The EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection26.19
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection52.93

[back to top]

DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score

The EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection84.2
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection87.33

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores

The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection28.73
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection27.56

[back to top]

DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score

The EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection82.16
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection79.45

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-5D Scores

The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection0.83

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-5D Scores

The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection1

[back to top]

De Quervain's Treatment Group: QuickDASH Scores

The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection26.19
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection52.93

[back to top]

De Quervain's Treatment Group: QuickDASH Scores

The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection23.61
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection68.34

[back to top]

De Quervain's Treatment Group: QuickDASH Scores

The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection39.05
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection47.40

[back to top]

De Quervain's Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score

VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher and worse the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection4.35
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection5.35

[back to top]

De Quervain's Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score

VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher and worse the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection3.05
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection7.33

[back to top]

DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-5D Score

The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection0.83
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection0.71

[back to top]

DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-5D Score

The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection0.85
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection0.74

[back to top]

DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-5D Score

The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection0.75
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection0.75

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-5D Scores

The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection0.83

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score

The EQ-VAS (EuroQol visual analog scale) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection85

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score

The EQ-VAS (EuroQol visual analog scale) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection90

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score

The EQ-VAS (EuroQol visual analog scale) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection89

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) in Lateral Epicondyle

Clinician will examine the patient and palpate over the lateral epicondyle. Presence of pain is a positive test, recorded as 1. Absence of pain is a negative test, recorded as 0. This is done at every visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection1

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) Over Lateral Epicondyle

Clinician will examine the patient and palpate over the lateral epicondyle. Presence of pain is a positive test, recorded as 1. Absence of pain is a negative test, recorded as 0. This is done at every visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection1

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) With Resisted Wrist Extension

The clinician examines the patient and asks patient to extend wrist against resistance by the clinician. Production of pain is a positive test, recorded as 1. Absence of pain is a negative test, recorded as 0. This is done at every visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection1

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) With Resisted Wrist Extension

The clinician examines the patient and asks patient to extend wrist against resistance by the clinician. Production of pain is a positive test, recorded as 1. Absence of pain is a negative test, recorded as 0. This is done at every visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection0

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) With Resisted Wrist Extension

The clinician examines the patient and asks patient to extend wrist against resistance by the clinician. Production of pain is a positive test, recorded as 1. Absence of pain is a negative test, recorded as 0. This is done at every visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection1

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores

The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection8

[back to top]

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores

The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection9

[back to top]

Trigger Finger Treatment Group: VAS Pain Scores

VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit. (NCT02266433)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection4.20
Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection4.48

[back to top]

Provider Ease of Insertion (0-100mm VAS)

Physician who did the procedure will complete a 0-100mm VAS on ease of insertion of the sterilization devices with anchors 0 equals no difficulty and 100 equals very difficult. (NCT02312739)
Timeframe: Within 5 minutes after the Essure® procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Vicodin, Lorazepam and Oxygen22.7
Placebo Pills and Nitrous Oxide19.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pain Scale Measurement During and After the Procedure

Pain is assessed using a 0-100mm VAS with anchors 0 equals no pain and 100 equals worst pain imaginable. It is taken at baseline, after paracervical block injection and after placement of second Essure® coil. A final pain assessment is done prior to discharge. (NCT02312739)
Timeframe: At baseline before the procedure, during the procedure after paracervical block injection and after placement of second Essure® coil, and prior to discharge from clinic (approximately 30-45 minutes postprocedure)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline PainAfter Parcervical BlockAt Second Coil PlacementPain at Clinic Discharge
Placebo Pills and Nitrous Oxide2.515.414.912.4
Vicodin, Lorazepam and Oxygen1.115.640.720.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Patient Anxiety Scale After the Procedure

Participants were asked to complete a validated short form of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) at baseline and at 3-5 minutes after the in-office sterilization procedure. On the STAI scale, participants rated five statements (I feel calm, I am tense, I feel upset, I am relaxed, I am worried) on a 1 - 4 scale (Not at all, Somewhat, Moderately, Very Much, totaling in a score from 0-20 (0 being least anxious, 20 being the most anxious). (NCT02312739)
Timeframe: At baseline before the procedure and at 3-5 minutes after the Essure® procedure

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pre-procedurePost-procedure
Placebo Pills and Nitrous Oxide9.48.2
Vicodin, Lorazepam and Oxygen8.48.5

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction (5-point Likert Scale)

Patients were asked to rate their overall satisfaction with the procedure using a 5-point Likert scale (Very unsatisfied, Unsatisfied, Neutral, Satisfied, Very satisfied). Results were analyzed to portray the percentage of participants who felt satisfied at the listed interval levels. (NCT02312739)
Timeframe: Prior to discharge from clinic, approximately 30-45 minutes post-procedure

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Very satisfied/satisfied with pain managementNeutral, unsatisfied or very unsatisfied
Placebo Pills and Nitrous Oxide8515
Vicodin, Lorazepam and Oxygen7723

[back to top]

Pain Scale Measurement - Maximum Pain Experienced

The maximum pain that was experienced during the procedure is assessed using a 0-100mm VAS with anchors 0 equals no pain and 100 equals worst pain imaginable. It is taken at 3 to 5 minutes following completion of the procedure. (NCT02312739)
Timeframe: At 3-5 minutes after the procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Vicodin, Lorazepam and Oxygen54.5
Placebo Pills and Nitrous Oxide22.8

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption (Number of Pills Taken)

"Daily opioid consumption assessed as number of pills taken that day, each day for 7 days post-operatively~Outcome measure reported below is mean number of opioid pills consumed per day." (NCT02313675)
Timeframe: 7 days

Interventionpills consumed (Mean)
IV Tylenol0.2
IV Toradol0.7
IV Tylenol/Toradol Combination1.0
Saline0.7

[back to top]

Postoperative Pain (Pain Scores From 0-10 Scale)

This is an ordinal pain scale. The patient picks a number from 0-10 scale every 4 hours for 7 days post-operatively. 0 is no pain, 10 is the worst pain imaginable. Lower scores would be preferable to higher scores. (NCT02313675)
Timeframe: 7 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
IV Tylenol2.0
IV Toradol2.9
IV Tylenol/Toradol Combination2.7
Saline2.0

[back to top]

Length of Hospital Stay

Safety as measured by Length of hospital stay (NCT02344225)
Timeframe: on average 6 months

InterventionDays (Mean)
Caffeine+Saline IV+Saline Drops126
Caffeine+Ibp IV+Saline Drops74
Caffeine+Saline+Ketorolac Drops68

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

We did not reach the target number of participants needed to measure statistically reliable outcome measure. The secondary outcome measure included Intraventricular hemorrhage (Papile's criteria) and ocular examination for corneal lesions. (NCT02344225)
Timeframe: Eye examinations was done at standard of care through discharge and once, at 50 weeks PCA. All infants underwent routine eye examination by a pediatric ophthalmologist according to the International Classification for ROP

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Caffeine+Saline IV+Saline Drops0
Caffeine+Ibp IV+Saline Drops0
Caffeine+Saline+Ketorolac Drops1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Reported Sustained Headache Relief at 24-hour Follow-up

"Sustained headache relief defined as achieving headache relief (i.e. headache pain intensity of mild or none) and maintaining this level for 24 hours without the use of rescue medications after emergency department discharge." (NCT02358681)
Timeframe: 24 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ketorolac, Intranasal7
Ketorolac, Intravenous12

[back to top]

Change in Pain Score After Analgesic Administration (Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R)

Measure the change in pain score after administration of analgesic using the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R) at 60 minutes after analgesic administration. The FPS-R is scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain intensity, i.e. worst outcome). (NCT02358681)
Timeframe: 60 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac, Intranasal4.2
Ketorolac, Intravenous4.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Headache Freedom During Emergency Department Visit

"Headache freedom defined as achieving a headache pain intensity of none, without receipt of rescue medications." (NCT02358681)
Timeframe: 2 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ketorolac, Intranasal11
Ketorolac, Intravenous17

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Pain Score Between Baseline and One Hour

Percentage change in pain score between baseline and one hour after study medication administration. Pain measured using the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R), which is scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain intensity, i.e. worst outcome). Positive values (i.e. percentage change) indicate a DECREASE (i.e. improvement) in pain intensity. (NCT02358681)
Timeframe: 1 hour

Interventionpercentage of initial pain intensity (Mean)
Ketorolac, Intranasal69.8
Ketorolac, Intravenous71.8

[back to top]

Time to Achieve Clinically Significant Reduction in Pain After Analgesic Administration (Pain Score)

Pain score will be assessed at 10, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after analgesic administration, until pain score decreases by 2/10 on the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R). The FPS-R is scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximal pain, i.e. worst outcome) (NCT02358681)
Timeframe: 10, 30, 60 and 120 minutes

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Ketorolac, Intranasal21.9
Ketorolac, Intravenous18.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Headache Relief During Emergency Department Visit

Headache relief defined as change of the patient's headache pain intensity from severe to moderate to either mild or none, without receipt of rescue medications. (NCT02358681)
Timeframe: 2 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ketorolac, Intranasal25
Ketorolac, Intravenous26

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Received Rescue Medications During Emergency Department Visit

Rescue medication defined as an additional parenteral analgesic administered in response to inadequate improvement in pain. Rescue medication was administered when deemed clinically indicated by the treating clinician. (NCT02358681)
Timeframe: 12 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ketorolac, Intranasal6
Ketorolac, Intravenous5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Reported Positive Overall Efficacy and Tolerability at 24-hour Follow-up

"Patient's assessment of overall efficacy and tolerability was assessed by asking the question, The next time you come to the emergency department with a headache or migraine, do you want to be given the same medication?. A yes response was considered positive assessment of overall efficacy and tolerability." (NCT02358681)
Timeframe: 24 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ketorolac, Intranasal19
Ketorolac, Intravenous21

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Reported Sustained Headache Freedom at 24-hour Follow-up

"Sustained headache freedom defined as achieving headache freedom (i.e. headache pain intensity of none), and maintaining this level for 24 hours without the use of rescue medications after emergency department discharge." (NCT02358681)
Timeframe: 24 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ketorolac, Intranasal7
Ketorolac, Intravenous12

[back to top]

Adverse Events

Adverse events will be assessed at the 1- and 2-hour assessments and the 24-hour follow up. (NCT02358681)
Timeframe: 24 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ketorolac, Intranasal0
Ketorolac, Intravenous1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Used Rescue Medication(s) Within 24 Hours After Emergency Department Discharge

Rescue medications used after emergency department discharged defined as an analgesic taken by the participant at home to reduce pain associated with their headache. (NCT02358681)
Timeframe: 24 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ketorolac, Intranasal12
Ketorolac, Intravenous8

[back to top]

Anti-emetic Doses

Total doses of medications to treat pruritus (opioid side-effect) including ondansetron and promethazine. (NCT02509312)
Timeframe: 0 - 24 hours post-partum

Interventiondoses (Median)
Ketorolac0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Total Hydromorphone Dose

Total hydromorphone doses in mg in the first 24 hours post-partum. (NCT02509312)
Timeframe: 0 - 24 hours post-partum.

Interventionmg (Median)
Ketorolac0
Placebo0.2

[back to top]

Pruritus Doses

Total doses of medications to treat pruritus (opioid side-effect) including diphenhydramine, nalbuphine and naloxone. (NCT02509312)
Timeframe: 0 - 24 hours post-partum

Interventiondoses (Median)
Ketorolac0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Percentile Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at 6,12, and 24 Hours

Percentile change in diastolic Blood Pressure at 6,12, and 24 hours for each patient's baseline defined by immediate post-op PACU vitals. (NCT02509312)
Timeframe: 0 - 24 hours post-partum

,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
6 hours12 hours24 hours
Ketorolac12.308.812.0
Placebo7.68.811.1

[back to top]

Post-Partum Hemorrhage

Rate of Post-Partum Hemorrhage between groups during the first 24 hours pst-partum. (NCT02509312)
Timeframe: 0 - 24 hours post-partum

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ketorolac7
Placebo4

[back to top]

Estimated Blood Loss (EBL)

Estimation of blood loss during surgery (NCT02509312)
Timeframe: Immediately post-op

Interventionml (Median)
Ketorolac900
Placebo800

[back to top]

Units of Packed Reb Blood Cell Transfused

Total number of Units of Packed Reb Blood Cell Transfused in intra-op until 24 hours post-partum. (NCT02509312)
Timeframe: Intra-op until 24 hours post-partum.

Interventionunits of pRBCs (Median)
Ketorolac0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Corrected Change in Hct on POD1.

Corrected change in Hct on POD1. Performed by subtracting POD1 Hct from POD0 Hct. Correction for transfusion by further subtracting 3 per unit of pRBC transfused to account for the typical change seen per unit transfused. (NCT02509312)
Timeframe: POD1

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Ketorolac-5.1
Placebo-3.5

[back to top]

Percentile Change in Systolic Blood Pressure at 6,12, and 24 Hours

Percentile change in Systolic Blood Pressure at 6,12, and 24 hours for each patient's baseline defined by immediate post-op PACU vitals. (NCT02509312)
Timeframe: 0 - 24 hours post-partum

,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
6 hours12 hours24 hours
Ketorolac-2.0-9.10-5.9
Placebo-0.6-2.85-3.5

[back to top]

Change in Pain Score Post-Cesarean Delivery

Pain score post-Cesarean Delivery using 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS): 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable (NCT02509312)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours post-cesarean delivery

,
Interventionunits on NRS (Median)
Baseline15 mins1 hour6 hours12 hours24 hours
Ketorolac000124.5
Placebo00033.55.5

[back to top]

Uterotonic Doses

Total number of uterotonic doses including methylergonovine, carboprost and misoprostol. (NCT02509312)
Timeframe: 0 - 24 hours post-partum

Interventiondoses (Median)
Ketorolac0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Length of Stay

Measured in hours (NCT02543801)
Timeframe: Start of surgery to hospital discharge up to 140 hours

InterventionHours (Mean)
Hip Cohort Liposomal Bupivacaine33.8
Hip Cohort Ropivacaine50.3
Knee Cohort Liposomal Bupivacaine36.0
Knee Cohort Ropivacaine38.4

[back to top]

Narcotic Consumption

Total amount of narcotics administered as calculated in oral morphine equivalent dose immediate post operatively up to 48 hours. (NCT02543801)
Timeframe: Starting immediately post operatively up to 48 hours

Interventionmorphine equivalents (Mean)
Hip Cohort Liposomal Bupivacaine48.8
Hip Cohort Ropivacaine57.4
Knee Cohort Liposomal Bupivacaine52.2
Knee Cohort Ropivacaine50.0

[back to top]

Pain Score

"Self-reported pain score 0-10 (0=no pain - 10=worst possible pain experienced) and higher scores indicate a worse outcome~Pain scores, collected every 4 hours per hospital care standards, were averaged (post-operatively up to 48 hours) to obtain individual mean pain scores and a mean score for the group was then calculated." (NCT02543801)
Timeframe: Starting post operatively and then every four hours up to 48 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Hip Cohort Liposomal Bupivacaine3.78
Hip Cohort Ropivacaine3.85
Knee Cohort Liposomal Bupivacaine3.3
Knee Cohort Ropivacaine3.4

[back to top]

Narcotic Use During Hospitalization

The amount of narcotic pain medication needed for patient to be comfortable. This is measured in morphine equivalents since there are many pain medications other than morphine. (NCT02570503)
Timeframe: 0-24 hours post surgery period, 24 - 48 hours post surgery period, and Full 48 hours post surgery period

,
Interventionmg morphine equivalents (Mean)
0 to 24 hour post surgery period24 to 48 hour post surgery periodFull 48 hour post surgery period
Placebo72.372.8145.7
ROP/KET/CLON/EPI/SAL58.966.5125.6

[back to top]

Pain Score at 3-24 Hours

Visual Analog Scale 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain (NCT02658149)
Timeframe: measured once during time frame 3 hours-24 hours postoperative

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Psoas Compartment Block1.9
Periarticular Local Anesthetic1.3

[back to top]

Pain Score at 3 Hours

Visual Analog Scale 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain (NCT02658149)
Timeframe: 3 hours postoperative

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Psoas Compartment Block4.0
Periarticular Local Anesthetic2.9

[back to top]

Opioid Usage In-hospital at 48 Hours

Total amount of opioids used per patient (measured with Morphine Equivalent Units) (NCT02658149)
Timeframe: 48 hours postoperatively

InterventionMorphine Equivalent Units (Oral) (Mean)
Psoas Compartment Block22.3
Periarticular Local Anesthetic20.8

[back to top]

Opioid Usage In-hospital at 24 Hours

Total amount of opioids used per patient (measured with Morphine Equivalent Units) (NCT02658149)
Timeframe: 24 hours postoperatively

InterventionMorphine Equivalent Units (Oral) (Mean)
Psoas Compartment Block19.5
Periarticular Local Anesthetic16.7

[back to top]

Pain Score at 24-48 Hours

Visual Analog Scale 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain (NCT02658149)
Timeframe: measured once during time froma 24-48 hours postoperative

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Psoas Compartment Block1.9
Periarticular Local Anesthetic1.7

[back to top]

Cumulative Fentanyl Dose

(NCT02691572)
Timeframe: 24 h

Interventionmcg (Mean)
Wound Infiltration157.4
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block153.3

[back to top]

Veterans Rand - 12

"The Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) is a brief, generic, multi-use, self-administered health survey comprised of 12 items. The instrument is primarily used to measure health related quality of life, to estimate disease burden and to evaluate disease-specific benchmarks with other populations. The 12 items in the questionnaire correspond to eight principal physical and mental health domains including general health perceptions; physical functioning; role limitations due to physical and emotional problems; bodily pain; energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health.. The 12 items are summarized into two scores, a Physical Health Summary Measure {PCS-physical component score} and a Mental Health Summary Measure {MCS-mental component score}. Score range is 0 to 100, higher score denotes a better outcome.~This score range apply to both PCS and MCS." (NCT02700451)
Timeframe: 2 year follow up

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
PCS scoreMCS score
Intravenous (IV) Placebo51.244.5
IV Acetaminophen51.146.7
IV Ketorolac46.646.4

[back to top]

Veterans Rand - 12

"The Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) is a brief, generic, multi-use, self-administered health survey comprised of 12 items. The instrument is primarily used to measure health related quality of life, to estimate disease burden and to evaluate disease-specific benchmarks with other populations. The 12 items in the questionnaire correspond to eight principal physical and mental health domains including general health perceptions; physical functioning; role limitations due to physical and emotional problems; bodily pain; energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health.. The 12 items are summarized into two scores, a Physical Health Summary Measure {PCS-physical component score} and a Mental Health Summary Measure {MCS-mental component score}. Score range is 0 to 100, higher score denotes a better outcome.~This score range apply to both PCS and MCS." (NCT02700451)
Timeframe: 3 month follow up

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
PCS scoreMCS score
Intravenous (IV) Placebo48.744.3
IV Acetaminophen42.345.3
IV Ketorolac43.145.0

[back to top]

Veterans Rand - 12

"The Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) is a brief, generic, multi-use, self-administered health survey comprised of 12 items. The instrument is primarily used to measure health related quality of life, to estimate disease burden and to evaluate disease-specific benchmarks with other populations. The 12 items in the questionnaire correspond to eight principal physical and mental health domains including general health perceptions; physical functioning; role limitations due to physical and emotional problems; bodily pain; energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health.. The 12 items are summarized into two scores, a Physical Health Summary Measure {PCS-physical component score} and a Mental Health Summary Measure {MCS-mental component score}. Score range is 0 to 100, higher score denotes a better outcome.~This score range apply to both PCS and MCS." (NCT02700451)
Timeframe: pre-operative

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
PCS scoreMCS Score
Intravenous (IV) Placebo34.242.9
IV Acetaminophen34.542.0
IV Ketorolac34.743.9

[back to top] [back to top]

Veterans Rand - 12

"The Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) is a brief, generic, multi-use, self-administered health survey comprised of 12 items. The instrument is primarily used to measure health related quality of life, to estimate disease burden and to evaluate disease-specific benchmarks with other populations. The 12 items in the questionnaire correspond to eight principal physical and mental health domains including general health perceptions; physical functioning; role limitations due to physical and emotional problems; bodily pain; energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health.. The 12 items are summarized into two scores, a Physical Health Summary Measure {PCS-physical component score} and a Mental Health Summary Measure {MCS-mental component score}. Score range is 0 to 100, higher score denotes a better outcome.~This score range apply to both PCS and MCS." (NCT02700451)
Timeframe: 1 year follow up

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
PCS scoreMCS score
Intravenous (IV) Placebo47.645.0
IV Acetaminophen48.445.3
IV Ketorolac48.142.8

[back to top]

Perioperative Opioid Use

Measure the impact of treatment on total opioid use during the hospital stay (NCT02700451)
Timeframe: Hospital stay (2-4 days)

,,
Interventionoral morphine equivalents (OME) (mmg) (Median)
OME total in the first 72HOME total to discharge
Intravenous (IV) Placebo306.6324
IV Acetaminophen192.4237.9
IV Ketorolac86.2588.95

[back to top]

Perioperative Complications - Drain Output

Complications such as: excessive drain output, elevation in creatinine, and the need for transfusions will be identified and recorded (NCT02700451)
Timeframe: Hospital Stay (1-4 days)

,,
InterventionmL (Median)
Total Drain output 24HTotal Drain output 48HTotal Drain output 72HTotal Drain output at discharge
Intravenous (IV) Placebo235305335335
IV Acetaminophen240320340340
IV Ketorolac270390390390

[back to top]

Numerical Pain Rating Scale

Validated pain scale; will be completed by patient Minimum Score: 0 & Maximum score 100 A lower score is representative of a low pain level (NCT02700451)
Timeframe: 2 year follow up

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
2 year - Current pain level2 year - Best pain level2 year - Worst pain level
Intravenous (IV) Placebo301.5
IV Acetaminophen12.58.518
IV Ketorolac4113

[back to top]

Numerical Pain Rating Scale

Validated pain scale; will be completed by patient Minimum Score: 0 & Maximum score 100 A lower score is representative of a low pain level (NCT02700451)
Timeframe: 1 year follow up

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
1-year - Current pain level1-year - Best pain level1-year - Worst pain level
Intravenous (IV) Placebo708
IV Acetaminophen13925
IV Ketorolac6411

[back to top]

Numerical Pain Rating Scale

Validated pain scale; will be completed by patient Minimum Score: 0 & Maximum score 100 A lower score is representative of a low pain level (NCT02700451)
Timeframe: 1 days and 3 days

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
POD1 - Current pain levelPOD1 - Best pain levelPOD1 - Worst pain levelPOD3 - Current pain levelPDO3 - Best pain levelPOD3 - Worst pain level
Intravenous (IV) Placebo4624.589.5472583
IV Acetaminophen422174523972.5
IV Ketorolac392362662384

[back to top]

Brief Pain Inventory

The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is a self-administered questionnaire for chronic pain conditions. The BPI gives two main scores: a pain severity score and a pain interference score. The pain severity score is calculated from the four items about pain intensity. Each item is rated from 0, no pain, to 10, pain as bad as you can imagine, and contributes with the same weight to the final score, ranging from 0 to 40. The pain interference score corresponds to the item on pain interference. The seven sub-items are rated from 0, does not interfere, to 10, completely interferes, and contributes with the same weight to the final score, ranging from 0 to 70. The first item, pain drawing diagrams (painful and most painful areas) and the items on pain relief treatment or medication (list of the treatments and amount of relief) do not contribute to the scoring. (NCT02700451)
Timeframe: 1 day and 3 days

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
POD1 - Pain has interfered with General ActivityPOD1 - Pain has interfered with MoodPOD1 - Pain has interfered with Walking AbilityPOD1 - Pain has interfered with Normal workPOD1 - Pain has interfered with Relation with otherPOD1 - Pain has interfered with SleepPOD1 - Pain has interfered with Enjoyment of lifePOD3 - Pain has interfered with General ActivityPOD3 - Pain has interfered with MoodPOD3 - Pain has interfered with Walking AbilityPOD3 - Pain has interfered with Normal workPOD3 - Pain has interfered with Relation with otherPOD3 - Pain has interfered with SleepPOD3 - Pain has interfered with Enjoyment of life
Intravenous (IV) Placebo947102.559734.510246.5
IV Acetaminophen91.5781.5678568458
IV Ketorolac6.52580358559267

[back to top]

Oswestry Disability Index

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is the most commonly used outcome-measure questionnaire for low back pain in a hospital setting. It is a self-administered questionnaire divided into ten sections designed to assess limitations of various activities of daily living. Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability. The index is calculated by dividing the summed score by the total possible score, which is then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage. Thus, for every question not answered, the denominator is reduced by 5. If a patient marks more than one statement in a question, the highest scoring statement is recorded as a true indication of disability. (NCT02700451)
Timeframe: pre-operative

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
IV Ketorolac36.3
Intravenous (IV) Placebo35.4
IV Acetaminophen40.6

[back to top]

Oswestry Disability Index

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is the most commonly used outcome-measure questionnaire for low back pain in a hospital setting. It is a self-administered questionnaire divided into ten sections designed to assess limitations of various activities of daily living. Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability. The index is calculated by dividing the summed score by the total possible score, which is then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage. Thus, for every question not answered, the denominator is reduced by 5. If a patient marks more than one statement in a question, the highest scoring statement is recorded as a true indication of disability. (NCT02700451)
Timeframe: 3 month follow up

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
IV Ketorolac22.8
Intravenous (IV) Placebo18.8
IV Acetaminophen25.0

[back to top]

Oswestry Disability Index

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is the most commonly used outcome-measure questionnaire for low back pain in a hospital setting. It is a self-administered questionnaire divided into ten sections designed to assess limitations of various activities of daily living. Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability. The index is calculated by dividing the summed score by the total possible score, which is then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage. Thus, for every question not answered, the denominator is reduced by 5. If a patient marks more than one statement in a question, the highest scoring statement is recorded as a true indication of disability. (NCT02700451)
Timeframe: 2 year follow up

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
IV Ketorolac14.7
Intravenous (IV) Placebo11.4
IV Acetaminophen16.0

[back to top]

Oswestry Disability Index

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is the most commonly used outcome-measure questionnaire for low back pain in a hospital setting. It is a self-administered questionnaire divided into ten sections designed to assess limitations of various activities of daily living. Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability. The index is calculated by dividing the summed score by the total possible score, which is then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage. Thus, for every question not answered, the denominator is reduced by 5. If a patient marks more than one statement in a question, the highest scoring statement is recorded as a true indication of disability. (NCT02700451)
Timeframe: 1 year follow up

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
IV Ketorolac16.9
Intravenous (IV) Placebo12.1
IV Acetaminophen17.8

[back to top]

Length of Stay

Will record date of discharge (NCT02700451)
Timeframe: Hospital Stay (1-4 days)

InterventionHour (Mean)
IV Ketorolac49.5
Intravenous (IV) Placebo77
IV Acetaminophen70

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Chronic Pain

Phone interview asking patient about presence of pain at incision site (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo0
Ropivacaine0

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Experiencing Vomiting

Asking patients whether or not they experienced the symptom in the preceding time-frame (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 48 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo1
Ropivacaine0

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Experiencing Pruritus

Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst imaginable (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Placebo3.5
Ropivacaine4

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Experiencing Vomiting

Asking patients whether or not they experienced the symptom in the preceding time-frame (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 24 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo4
Ropivacaine4

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Experiencing Vomiting

Asking patients whether or not they experienced the symptom in the preceding time-frame (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 2 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo7
Ropivacaine8

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Experiencing Pruritus

Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst imaginable (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 48 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0
Ropivacaine0

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Experiencing Pruritus

Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst imaginable (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 2 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Placebo4
Ropivacaine5.5

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Experiencing Nausea

Asking patients whether or not they experienced the symptom in the preceding time-frame (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 48 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo4
Ropivacaine1

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Experiencing Nausea

Asking patients whether or not they experienced the symptom in the preceding time-frame (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 24 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo9
Ropivacaine7

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Experiencing Nausea

Asking patients whether or not they experienced the symptom in the preceding time-frame (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 2 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo14
Ropivacaine12

[back to top]

Pain Scores at Rest

Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst imaginable (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo2
Ropivacaine2

[back to top]

Pain Score on Movement

Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst imaginable (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 48 hours after surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Placebo5.5
Ropivacaine5

[back to top]

Time to First Rescue Analgesic

(NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 48 hours

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Placebo660
Ropivacaine954

[back to top]

Postpartum Depression, as Measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale

Patients contacted over the phone completed screening with the EPDS, on a scale of 0-30. A score of over 13 indicate risk for postpartum depression (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Placebo1
Ropivacaine0.5

[back to top]

Postpartum Depression, as Measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale

Patients contacted over the phone completed screening with the EPDS, on a scale of 0-30. A score of over 13 indicate risk for postpartum depression (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo3
Ropivacaine1

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction With Postoperative Analgesia on a 0-10 Scale

Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being not at all satisfied and 10 being completely satisfied (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 48 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Placebo9.5
Ropivacaine8

[back to top]

Pain Scores at Rest

Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst imaginable (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 48 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Placebo2
Ropivacaine2

[back to top]

Pain Scores at Rest

Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst imaginable (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 2 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Placebo2
Ropivacaine0

[back to top]

Pain Score on Movement (Sitting in Bed From a Supine Position)

Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst imaginable (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Placebo5
Ropivacaine5

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption

measured in mg oxycodone equivalents (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 48 hours

Interventionmg Oxycodone Equivalent (Mean)
Placebo20
Ropivacaine10

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption

measured in mg oxycodone equivalents (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionmg Oxycodone Equivalent (Median)
Placebo5
Ropivacaine5

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption

measured in mg oxycodone equivalents (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 2 hours

Interventionmg Oxycodone Equivalent (Median)
Placebo0
Ropivacaine0

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Chronic Pain

Phone interview asking patient about presence of pain at incision site (NCT02829944)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo3
Ropivacaine3

[back to top]

Time Until PCA Discontinued After the Operation

The investigators hypothesize that the use of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen in addition to IV ketorolac with narcotic pain pump will decrease time to transition off PCA/NCA to oral pain medications. (NCT02881996)
Timeframe: 4 days

Interventionhours (Mean)
IV Tylenol76.4
No IV Tylenol86.7

[back to top]

Postoperative Duration of Hospital Stay

The investigators will measure postoperative time to discharge (NCT02881996)
Timeframe: 1 week

Interventiondays (Median)
IV Tylenol3.9
No IV Tylenol4.5

[back to top]

Number of Eyes With Pupil Diameter Less Than 6 mm During Cortical Clean-up

Number of eyes with a measured pupil diameter less than 6 mm during cortical clean-up (NCT02895035)
Timeframe: During cataract surgery, cortical clean-up stage, up to 5 mins

InterventionEyes (Count of Units)
Epinephrine3
Omidria2

[back to top]

Number of Eyes With Pupil Diameter Less Than 6 mm at Any Time During Surgery

Number of eyes with a measured pupil diameter less than 6 mm at any time during surgery (NCT02895035)
Timeframe: During cataract surgery, with maximum end time of 20 minutes

InterventionEyes (Count of Units)
Epinephrine3
Omidria2

[back to top]

Maximum Intraoperative Change in Pupil Diameter

This is the maximum observed change in pupil diameter, as measured compared to baseline. (NCT02895035)
Timeframe: During cataract surgery, with maximum end time of 20 minutes

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Epinephrine-0.71
Omidria-0.66

[back to top]

Mean Area Under the Curve Change From Baseline in Pupil Diameter Over Time to the End of Cataract Surgery

Mean area under the curve was calculated by assessing the pupil diameter at baseline and then again at 1 minute intervals until the surgery was complete (max 20 minutes). Units are in millimeters*seconds (NCT02895035)
Timeframe: During cataract surgery, with maximum end time of 20 minutes

Interventionmillimeters * seconds (Mean)
Epinephrine1.76
Omidria0.8

[back to top]

Pain Score at 30 Minutes

The trial will compare the patient's pain score on a 11 point Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain, 5 moderate pain and 10 very severe pain, at 30 minutes (NCT02902770)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine and Normal Saline Push5.52
Ketorolac and Normal Saline Drip3.88
Lidocaine and Ketorolac3.14

[back to top]

Apgar Score at 5 Minutes

This is the Apgar score of the newborn collected at 5 minutes. Range is from 0-10, with the higher scores meaning a better outcome. (NCT02922985)
Timeframe: 5 minutes after birth

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Placebo Control Group9
Multimodal Pain Regimen Group9

[back to top]

Time to First Administration of Opioid Pain Medication Post Operatively

Time, in hours, to first administration of opioid pain medication post operatively (NCT02922985)
Timeframe: 48 hours post cesarean delivery

Interventionhours (Median)
Placebo Control Group6.05
Multimodal Pain Regimen Group6.35

[back to top]

Pain Score at 6-12 Hours Post Operatively

Pain score at 6-12 hours post-operatively, expressed on a pain scale from 0-10 with the higher score meaning worse pain (outcome). (NCT02922985)
Timeframe: 6-12 hours post-operatively

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Placebo Control Group6
Multimodal Pain Regimen Group6

[back to top]

Pain Score at 48 Hours Post-operatively

Pain Score at 48 Hours Post-operatively, expressed on a pain scale from 0-10 with the higher score meaning worse pain (outcome). (NCT02922985)
Timeframe: 48 hours post-operatively

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Placebo Control Group4
Multimodal Pain Regimen Group3

[back to top]

Number of Opioid Pain Tablets Remaining on Post-operative Day #7 From the Discharge Prescription.

Number of opioid pain tablets remaining on post-operative day #7 from hospital discharge as reported by patients (NCT02922985)
Timeframe: 7 days post delivery

InterventionTablets (Median)
Placebo Control Group18
Multimodal Pain Regimen Group19

[back to top]

NICU Admission

Rate of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NCT02922985)
Timeframe: after birth and before hospital discharge

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo Control Group2
Multimodal Pain Regimen Group6

[back to top]

Need for Respiratory Support

neonate receipt of oxygen by nasal cannula or mechanical ventilation (NCT02922985)
Timeframe: after birth and before hospital discharge

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo Control Group0
Multimodal Pain Regimen Group4

[back to top]

Hospital Length of Stay

Time to discharge from hospital, measured in hours (NCT02922985)
Timeframe: From time of hospital admission to time of discharge home up to 168 hours.

Interventionhours (Median)
Placebo Control Group50.2
Multimodal Pain Regimen Group50

[back to top]

Pain Score at 24 Hours Post-operatively

Pain Score at 24 Hours Post Operatively, expressed on a pain scale from 0-10 with the higher score meaning worse pain (outcome). (NCT02922985)
Timeframe: 24 hours post-operatively

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Placebo Control Group5
Multimodal Pain Regimen Group6

[back to top]

Total Opioid Intake in Morphine Milligram Equivalents in the First 48 Hours After Cesarean Delivery (CD)

Every opioid intake by the patient in the first 48 hours after CD will be recorded and quantified in morphine milligram equivalents (NCT02922985)
Timeframe: 48 hours post cesarean delivery

Interventionmorphine milligram equivalents (Median)
Placebo Control Group42
Multimodal Pain Regimen Group49.5

[back to top]

Breastfeeding Initiation

All patients will be queried regarding whether breastfeeding was initiated after cesarean birth and how soon after birth (NCT02956616)
Timeframe: Until patient's day of hospital discharge or a maximum of one month from cesarean delivery

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BreastfeedingBottlefeedingBoth Breastfeeding and Bottlefeeding
Enhanced Recovery39415
Routine Perioperative Care29229

[back to top]

Postoperative Pain Medication Requirement

The amount of postoperative pain medication required for each patient in Morphine Milligram Equivalents (NCT02956616)
Timeframe: Until patient's day of hospital discharge or a maximum of one month from cesarean delivery

InterventionMorphine Milligram Equivalents (Mean)
Enhanced Recovery117.16
Routine Perioperative Care119.38

[back to top]

Discharge on Postoperative Day #2

Number of patients discharged on postoperative Day #2 (NCT02956616)
Timeframe: Until patient's day of hospital discharge or a maximum of one month from cesarean delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Enhanced Recovery5
Routine Perioperative Care2

[back to top]

Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay

Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay in Hours from time of surgery (NCT02956616)
Timeframe: Until patient's day of hospital discharge or a maximum of one month from cesarean delivery

InterventionHours (Median)
Enhanced Recovery73.58
Routine Perioperative Care75.50

[back to top]

Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRS) at Baseline and Three Months.

TPI were treated with a needle inserted into the trigger point with the goal of eliciting a local twitch responses(LTRs). When a LTR was obtained, 0.1mL of randomized drug was injected into that location within the muscle. This was repeated until LTRs disappeared, or 1.0mL had been injected, whichever came first. Such was performed in a similar manner for all affected muscles, up to a maximum of 2mL. Participants self-report their brief pain inventory at each of their injections (up to four subsequent injections) based off of the standardized Numeric Rating pain Scale (NRS). The NRS is nationally recognized numeric scale from zero to ten, with zero being an example of no pain,one to three would demonstrate mild pain, four to six would be moderate pain, seven to nine would be severe pain and a ten would be the worst pain possible. Improvement in BPI was determined if their NRS score went down with each injection(s). (NCT03028012)
Timeframe: Pre-Injection and Three Month Post Injection(s)

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Participant Number 3 at BaselineParticipant Number 3 at 3 MonthsParticipant Number 8 at BaselineParticipant Number 8 at 3 Months
Ketorolac8353

[back to top]

Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Modified

The BPI was evaluated on a scale from 0-10. Zero would mean no interference and 10 would be calculated at complete interferences. We used a 7-point questionnaire about pain. All scores were calculated at baseline and three months. (NCT03028012)
Timeframe: Baseline and Three Months

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
Participant Number #3 at BaselineParticipant Number #3 at 3 MonthsParticipant Number #8 at BaselineParticipant #8 at 3 Months
Ketorolac8353

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Responder Rate Greater Than 50% on the Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRS) Improvement

Participants in this study underwent TPIs by the following method. The needle was inserted into the trigger point with the goal of eliciting a local twitch responses(LTRs). When a LTR was obtained, 0.1mL of randomized drug was injected into that location within the muscle. This was repeated until LTRs disappeared, or 1.0mL had been injected, whichever came first. This was performed in a similar manner for all affected muscles, up to a maximum of 2mL. Participants self-report their brief pain inventory at each of their injections (up to four subsequent injections) based off of the standardized Numeric Rating pain Scale (NRS). The NRS is nationally recognized numeric scale from zero to ten, with zero being an example of no pain, one to three would demonstrate mild pain, four to six would be moderate pain, seven to nine would be severe pain and a ten would be the worst pain possible. Improvement in BPI was determined if their NRS score went down with each injection(s). (NCT03028012)
Timeframe: Pre-Post Injections Up to Three Months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ketorolac1
Lidocaine0
Dexamethasone0

[back to top]

Pain Before, During and After IUD Placement

Pain before, during and after IUD placement on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible) scale. Higher score mean a worse outcome. (NCT03031795)
Timeframe: Before, during and after IUD placement

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pain expected during the procedurePre-procedure pain ratingTenaculum placementUterine soundingDeployment of the IUDOverall pain rating during the procedureLevel of pain 10 minutes post procedure
Ketorolac4.10.42.73.34.23.61.1
Placebo4.50.73.24.25.74.92.5

[back to top]

Days of Oral Narcotic Use After Discharge

Measured using postoperative questionnaire (NCT03331315)
Timeframe: 2 weeks after discharge

InterventionDays (Mean)
Ketorolac5.7
Celecoxib3.8

[back to top]

Number of Oral Narcotic Pills Used After Discharge

Number of oral narcotic pills used after discharge until 2 week postoperative visit. (NCT03331315)
Timeframe: 2 weeks after discharge

InterventionPills (Mean)
Ketorolac8.1
Celecoxib6.0

[back to top]

Average Inpatient Postoperative Pain Score

Pain measured using the Visual Analog Scale, no pain (0-0.4 cm), mild pain(0.5-4.4 cm), moderate pain (4.5-7.4 cm), and severe pain (7.5-10.0 cm). Subscale scoring was not used in analysis but provided as reference for patient and nursing staff. (NCT03331315)
Timeframe: 48 hrs following surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac2.7
Celecoxib2.4

[back to top]

Average Inpatient Ondansetron Use

Average inpatient ondansetron use measured in milligrams (NCT03331315)
Timeframe: 48 hrs following surgery

InterventionMilligrams (Mean)
Ketorolac1.5
Celecoxib1.3

[back to top]

Return to Activities of Daily Living

Average number of days required for complete return to independent activities of daily living (NCT03331315)
Timeframe: 2 weeks after discharge

InterventionDays (Mean)
Ketorolac2.4
Celecoxib2.2

[back to top]

Average Inpatient Hydromorphone Use

Average inpatient hydromorphone use measured in milligrams (NCT03331315)
Timeframe: 48 hrs following surgery

InterventionMilligrams (Mean)
Ketorolac0.7
Celecoxib0.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Perioperative Complications

Perioperative Complications measured intraoperatively and postoperatively by type (NCT03331315)
Timeframe: During and after surgery

InterventionPatients (Number)
Ketorolac5
Celecoxib6

[back to top]

Total Hospital Stay

Total hospital stay from time fo admission to time of discharge measured in hours (NCT03331315)
Timeframe: Following surgery

InterventionHours (Mean)
Ketorolac11.6
Celecoxib11.9

[back to top]

Pain as Assessed by Score on the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS)

An average will be calculated of the daily score on the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS). BPS score ranges from 3-12, with higher scores indicating worse pain. This assessment is used in non-verbal participants. (NCT03472469)
Timeframe: until discharge from hospital or 30 days post admission (whichever is sooner)

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm2.5
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm2.3

[back to top]

Overall Costs

the costs associated with the overall hospitalization or the first 30 days (whichever is sooner) related to post trauma care and complications incurred. (NCT03472469)
Timeframe: until discharge from hospital or 30 days post admission (whichever is sooner)

Interventiondollars (Median)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm20093
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm19561

[back to top]

Opioid Use Per Day

Opioid use per day is calculated by tallying the dose equivalency of all opioids received and dividing by the number of days hospitalized. Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per day are reported. (NCT03472469)
Timeframe: until discharge from hospital or 30 days post admission (whichever is sooner)

InterventionMME per day (Median)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm48
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm34

[back to top]

Number of Ventilator Days

"The number of days the patient on a ventilator post injury or up to 30 days (whichever is sooner). Zero-inflated models are presented as estimated marginal means (95% Credible Interval). The data reported as mean actually refers to marginal mean, and the data reported as 95% Confidence Interval actually refers to a 95% Credible Interval." (NCT03472469)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionventilator days (Mean)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm0.08
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm0.06

[back to top]

Number of Participants Discharged From the Hospital With an Opioid Prescription

(NCT03472469)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm527
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm476

[back to top]

Number of Intensive Care Unti (ICU) Days

"The number of days the patient was in the ICU post injury or up to 30 days (whichever is sooner). Zero-inflated models are presented as estimated marginal means (95% Credible Interval). The data reported as mean actually refers to marginal mean, and the data reported as 95% Confidence Interval actually refers to a 95% Credible Interval." (NCT03472469)
Timeframe: 30 days

InterventionICU days (Mean)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm0.21
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm0.21

[back to top]

Number of Hospital Days

"The number of days the patient was hospitalized post injury or up to 30 days (whichever is sooner). Zero-inflated models are presented as estimated marginal means (95% Credible Interval). The data reported as mean actually refers to marginal mean, and the data reported as 95% Confidence Interval actually refers to a 95% Credible Interval." (NCT03472469)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionhospital days (Mean)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm4.97
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm5.12

[back to top]

Pharmacy Costs

The costs of the pain medications given during the specified time period. (NCT03472469)
Timeframe: until discharge from hospital or 30 days post admission (whichever is sooner)

Interventiondollars (Median)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm507
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm397

[back to top] [back to top]

Pain as Assessed by Score on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

An average will be calculated of the daily numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain (0=no pain, 10=worst pain). This assessment is used in verbal participants. (NCT03472469)
Timeframe: until discharge from hospital or 30 days post admission (whichever is sooner)

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Original MMPR - Descending Dose Arm3.3
MAST MMPR - Escalating Dose Arm3.3

[back to top]

Average Pain Intensity Level

The patient will be administered a survey and asked to rate their average pain intensity level since undergoing surgery. The patient will be asked to rate this average pain intensity level on an 11-point ordinal numeric rating scale ranging from 0-10, with 0 being no pain, and 10 being the worst possible pain. Higher scores are indicative of higher average pain intensity. (NCT03584373)
Timeframe: 1 week post surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Non-Opioid Analgesia3.34
Opioid Analgesia4.50

[back to top]

Unused Medications - Proportion of Prescribed Pills Unused at 1 Week Post-Surgery

Unused medications is defined as the proportion of prescribed pills that were unused at 1 week post surgery as reported by the patient. More unused medications may indicate the potential to decrease the dosage needed. (NCT03584373)
Timeframe: 1 week post surgery

Interventionproportion of unused pills (Mean)
Non-Opioid Analgesia0.63
Opioid Analgesia0.58

[back to top]

Satisfaction With Pain Relief

The patient will be administered a survey and asked to rate satisfaction with pain relief since the time of surgery and being on the assigned medication. Scoring will be on an 11-point ordinal numeric rating scale, with 0 being not satisfied with pain relief, and 10 being well-satisfied. Higher scores are indicative of greater satisfaction with pain relief (NCT03584373)
Timeframe: 1 week post surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Non-Opioid Analgesia8.70
Opioid Analgesia8.85

[back to top]

Rates of Constipation

Percentage of patients who experienced constipation any time during the week after surgery. A lower percentage of constipation may indicate less incidence of adverse events. (NCT03584373)
Timeframe: 1 week post surgery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Non-Opioid Analgesia11
Opioid Analgesia17

[back to top]

Perception of an Acceptable Pain Intensity Level

The patient will be administered a survey and asked to rate what their perception or belief of an acceptable pain intensity level would be since undergoing the surgery. The patient will be asked to rate this acceptable pain intensity level on an 11-point ordinal numeric rating scale ranging from 0-10, with 0 equaling no pain, and 10 being the worst possible pain. Higher scores are indicative of the patient's belief of an acceptable pain intensity level. (NCT03584373)
Timeframe: 1 week post surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Non-Opioid Analgesia2.73
Opioid Analgesia3.28

[back to top]

Peak Pain Intensity Level

The patient will be administered a survey and asked to rate the worst/peak pain intensity level since undergoing the surgery. The patient will be asked to rate this worst pain intensity level on an 11-point ordinal numeric rating scale ranging from 0-10, with 0 being no pain, and 10 being the worst possible pain. Higher scoring is indicative of worst/peak pain intensity level since the time of surgery (NCT03584373)
Timeframe: 1 week post surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Non-Opioid Analgesia5.61
Opioid Analgesia7.52

[back to top]

Current Pain Intensity Level

The patient will be administered a survey and asked to rate their current pain intensity level (1 week post surgery) on an 11-point ordinal numeric rating scale ranging from 0-10, with 0 being no pain, and 10 being the worst possible pain. Higher scores are indicative of greater pain intensity. (NCT03584373)
Timeframe: 1 week post surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Non-Opioid Analgesia1.14
Opioid Analgesia1.37

[back to top]

Change in Postsurgical Pain Based on the Weighted Sum of Pain Intensity (SPI) Assessments Over 96 Hours of the NRS Scores = Area Under the Curve (AUC)

Mean area under the curve (AUC) of the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) weighted sum of pain intensity scores (at rest) from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable for CA-008 compared to placebo. The time was collected 0 to 96 hours post-dose (NCT03599089)
Timeframe: [time frame: 96 hours]

Interventionscores on a scale*hour (Mean)
CA-008 0.7 mg (0.05 mg/mL Concentration)317.09
CA-008 2.1 mg (0.15 mg/mL Concentration)321.72
CA-008 4.2 mg (0.3 mg/mL Concentration)266.86
Placebo400.56

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Opioid Free

Percentage of subjects who are opioid-free for CA-008 compared to placebo. (NCT03599089)
Timeframe: [time frame: 96 hours]

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
CA-008 0.7 mg (0.05 mg/mL Concentration)19.4
CA-008 2.1 mg (0.15 mg/mL Concentration)16.7
CA-008 4.2 mg (0.3 mg/mL Concentration)26.3
Placebo5.4

[back to top]

Total Opioid Consumption (in Daily Morphine Equivalents)

Mean total postoperative opioid consumption (in daily oral morphine equivalents) for CA-008 compared to placebo (NCT03599089)
Timeframe: [time frame: 96 hours]

Interventionmg morphine equivalents/day (Mean)
CA-008 0.7 mg (0.05 mg/mL Concentration)42.50
CA-008 2.1 mg (0.15 mg/mL Concentration)37.71
CA-008 4.2 mg (0.3 mg/mL Concentration)28.22
Placebo56.11

[back to top]

Serum Creatinine Levels at One Year Post-operatively

Renal function was evaluated by following serum creatinine levels for up to one year post-operatively. (NCT03669081)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
Toradol and Lyrica0.6
Placebo and Standard of Care0.7

[back to top]

Cumulative Narcotic Use

Cumulative narcotic use was defined by cumulative morphine equivalents over the course of a patient's hospital course. The Washington State Agency Medical Director's Group Opioid dose calculator was used to provide a total morphine dose equivalent (MDE) for each patient while in the hospital. (NCT03669081)
Timeframe: 82.25 hours

Interventionmg (Median)
Toradol and Lyrica27
Placebo and Standard of Care45

[back to top]

30 Day Mortality

Primary outcomes include 30 day mortality post-operatively. (NCT03669081)
Timeframe: 30 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Toradol and Lyrica0
Placebo and Standard of Care0

[back to top]

Length of Hospital Stay

Primary outcomes include length of hospital stay (LOS). (NCT03669081)
Timeframe: 82.25 hours

Interventionhours (Median)
Toradol and Lyrica51.5
Placebo and Standard of Care57.3

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Urinary Retention

Patients were evaluated post-operatively during hospital stay for instances of urinary retention. (NCT03669081)
Timeframe: 82.25 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Toradol and Lyrica1
Placebo and Standard of Care0

[back to top]

Bleeding Risk

Hematocrit levels were evaluated post-operatively for up to a day post-operatively for signs of blood loss. (NCT03669081)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionpercentage of hematocrit (Mean)
Toradol and Lyrica6.3
Placebo and Standard of Care4.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Pain Score Greater Than 3

The patient reported pain scores will be recorded and analyzed for each group. The Pain Score is determined by the patient using a visual analog scale with a range from 0-10, where 0 is no pain at all and 10 is the worst pain imaginable for the patient. Pain scores were collected by postpartum nursing staff per institutional policy. The number of patients with a pain score greater than 3 will be reported. A pain score greater than 3 was chosen as a cutoff as this is the pain score at which an opioid may be indicated for analgesia at our institution. (NCT03678675)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard Protocol40
Ketorolac Protocol19

[back to top]

Postoperative Change in Hematocrit

The change in patient hematocrit from baseline to POD1 (NCT03678675)
Timeframe: Change in pre-operative hematocrit to POD1 hematocrit

Interventionpercentage of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
Standard Protocol-5.5
Ketorolac Protocol-5.5

[back to top]

Postoperative Satisfaction With Inpatient Pain Control

"Two weeks after cesarean section, subjects were contacted by telephone to complete a survey on postpartum pain management. At least three attempts were made to contact subjects by telephone. In the follow-up phone call, patients were asked to rate their satisfaction with their postpartum care: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. The number below describes the number of patients who reported they were very satisfied with their care." (NCT03678675)
Timeframe: Inpatient pain control satisfaction as reported at two weeks postpartum

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard Protocol35
Ketorolac Protocol29

[back to top]

Change in Creatinine

The change in patient's creatinine from POD1 to POD2 (NCT03678675)
Timeframe: Change in creatinine from POD1 to POD2

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Standard Protocol.03
Ketorolac Protocol.59

[back to top]

Postoperative Satisfaction With Their Inpatient Postpartum Care.

Two weeks after cesarean section, subjects were contacted by telephone to complete a survey on their overall postpartum care. At least three attempts were made to contact subjects by telephone. In the follow-up phone call, patients were asked to rate their satisfaction with their postpartum care: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. The number below describes the number of patients that reported they were very satisfied with their care. (NCT03678675)
Timeframe: Satisfaction with inpatient care as reported at two weeks postpartum

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard Protocol39
Ketorolac Protocol39

[back to top]

The Number of Patients That Used no Opioid Postoperatively

The number of patients in each arm that required no opioids for pain control postoperatively. (NCT03678675)
Timeframe: Within 72 post-operative hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard Protocol24
Ketorolac Protocol9

[back to top]

The Total Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) Used in the First 72 Postoperative Hours

The amount of MME's will be monitored for each group. MME's will be determined by the amount of opiate mediations administered. The MME value can range from 0 to typically 200 MME's, however there is no upper limit of measureable MME's. The MME's for each patient will be a sum of MME's administered throughout the course of the hospitalization. (NCT03678675)
Timeframe: Within 72 postoperative hours

InterventionMME (Median)
Standard Protocol60.0
Ketorolac Protocol30

[back to top]

Score on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain

VAS is a tool widely used to measure pain. A patient is asked to indicate his/her perceived pain intensity (most commonly) along a 100 mm horizontal line, and this rating is then measured from the left edge (=VAS score). The total score range is 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable); the higher the score, the worse the pain. (NCT03693404)
Timeframe: Hour 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
General Anesthesia3.3
Spinal Anesthesia2.5

[back to top]

Ambulation Distance

Ambulation is the ability to walk without the need for any kind of assistance. It is most often used when describing the goals of a patient after a surgery or physical therapy. (NCT03693404)
Timeframe: Post-operative Day 3

InterventionFeet (Mean)
General Anesthesia48.7
Spinal Anesthesia88.9

[back to top]

Amount (mg) of Narcotics (Oral Morphine mg Equivalents) Used

Number of mgs taken of oral morphine (NCT03693404)
Timeframe: Post-Operative Day 0

Interventionmorphine milligram equivalents (MME) (Mean)
General Anesthesia16
Spinal Anesthesia10

[back to top]

Percentge of Subjects in Severe Pain With Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-R; Windowed Worst Observation Carried Forward) of Pain Intensity Scores >7 on a Scale of 0-10 at Any Point. NRS-R for Pain Where 0 Equals no Pain and 10 Equals Worst Pain Imaginable.

(NCT03695367)
Timeframe: 72 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1: HTX-011 + MMA Regimen5
Cohort 2: HTX-011 + MMA Regimen + Ketorolac6

[back to top]

Percentge of Subjects Receiving no Opioid Rescue

(NCT03695367)
Timeframe: Day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1: HTX-011 + MMA Regimen28
Cohort 2: HTX-011 + MMA Regimen + Ketorolac24

[back to top]

Total Postoperative Opioid Consumption (in IV Morphine Milligram Equivalents [IV MME])

(NCT03695367)
Timeframe: 72 hours

InterventionMME, morphine milligram equivalents (Mean)
Cohort 1: HTX-011 + MMA Regimen0.59
Cohort 2: HTX-011 + MMA Regimen + Ketorolac1.32

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Receiving no Opioid Rescue

(NCT03695367)
Timeframe: 72 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1: HTX-011 + MMA Regimen30
Cohort 2: HTX-011 + MMA Regimen + Ketorolac27

[back to top]

Percentge of Subjects Receiving no Opioid Rescue

(NCT03695367)
Timeframe: 0-24 hours, 24-48 hours, 24-72 hours, 48-72 hours

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
0-24 hours24-48 hours24-72 hours48-72 hours
Cohort 1: HTX-011 + MMA Regimen30323233
Cohort 2: HTX-011 + MMA Regimen + Ketorolac27292828

[back to top]

Worst LBP 2 Days After ED Visit

Participants were called 2 days after ED visit and asked to report their worst LBP experienced over the previous 24 hours, using a four point ordinal scale: severe, moderate, mild, or none. (NCT03861611)
Timeframe: 2 days after Emergency department visit

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NoneMildModerateSevere
Diclofenac + Educational Intervention1325187
Ibuprofen + Educational Intervention10182311
Ketorolac + Educational Intervention829186

[back to top]

How Often Participants Used Assigned Medication

(NCT03861611)
Timeframe: 24 hours to 5 days

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeverOnly OnceSometimesOnce a dayTwice or more a day
Diclofenac + Educational Intervention0371538
Ibuprofen + Educational Intervention1541833
Ketorolac + Educational Intervention23102618

[back to top]

Frequency of LBP 2 Days After ED Visit

Participants were called 2 days after ED visit and asked to report the frequency of LBP experienced over the previous 24 hours. Frequency was assessed using the five point Likert scale: Not at all, Rarely, Sometimes, Usually, Always (NCT03861611)
Timeframe: 2 days after Emergency department visit

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeverRarelySometimesFrequentlyAlways
Diclofenac + Educational Intervention101421711
Ibuprofen + Educational Intervention71021915
Ketorolac + Educational Intervention6182656

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Day 5 in Functional Impairment

The change will be assessed by Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire between the baseline ED visit and the five day follow-up. The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale (0-24). (NCT03861611)
Timeframe: Baseline to 5 days

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Ketorolac + Educational Intervention11.9
Ibuprofen + Educational Intervention9.4
Diclofenac + Educational Intervention10.9

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Scores at 72 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable at 72 hours (NCT03885596)
Timeframe: 72 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
CA-008 Cohort 11.2
CA-008 Cohort 20.3
CA-008 Cohort 32.0
Exparel4.6

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores (at Rest) Over 72h

Area Under the Curve of pain intensity scores (using a Numeric Rating Scale of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable) over 72 hours (NCT03885596)
Timeframe: 0-72 hours

Interventionscore on a scale*hour (Mean)
CA-008 Cohort 172.30
CA-008 Cohort 266.24
CA-008 Cohort 3203.76
Exparel306.58

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Scores at 48 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable at 48 hours (NCT03885596)
Timeframe: 48 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
CA-008 Cohort 11.3
CA-008 Cohort 20.6
CA-008 Cohort 32.7
Exparel4.8

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Scores at 24 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable at 24 hours (NCT03885596)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
CA-008 Cohort 10.6
CA-008 Cohort 21.7
CA-008 Cohort 35.1
Exparel6.0

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption

Summary of opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (NCT03885596)
Timeframe: 0-72 hours

Interventionmg morphine equivalents (Mean)
CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 110.83
CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 23.33
CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 338.33
Exparel80.83

[back to top]

Postoperative Visual Analog Scale Scores

The Visual Analog Scale ranges from a minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 100. A smaller score would be considered a better outcome. (NCT03967847)
Timeframe: participants were assessed at one single time point up to 8 weeks.

Interventionscore/units on a scale (Median)
Control30
Ketorolac20

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Retear of Rotator Cuff Repair

Assessing retear of rotator cuff repair on postop MRI. (NCT03967847)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Control3
Ketorolac2

[back to top]

Visual Analog Pain (VAS) Pain Scale 7 Days Following Stent Removal.

Perceived pain on a scale of 0-10 (0= no pain, 10= worst pain ever experienced) recorded by phone call 7 days after stent removal. (NCT04112160)
Timeframe: Seven days following ureteral stent removal.

Interventionscore on a scale (0-10, 0= no pain) (Median)
Control0
Ketorolac0

[back to top]

Number of Patients That Required Opioid Medication Following Ureteral Stent Removal

Determine the use of opioid medications in morphine equivalents in the 24 hours following stent removal. (NCT04112160)
Timeframe: Twenty-four hours following stent removal.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Control17
Ketorolac17

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Unscheduled Return to Clinic or Emergency Room

Any unscheduled in-person clinical encounter secondary to renal colic following ureteral stent removal. (NCT04112160)
Timeframe: Seven days following ureteral stent removal.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Control8
Ketorolac1

[back to top]

Median Visual Analog Pain (VAS) Pain Scale Experienced by Participant 24 Hours Following Stent Removal

Perceived pain on a scale of 0-10 (0= no pain, 10= worst pain ever experienced) recorded by phone call 24 hours after stent removal. (NCT04112160)
Timeframe: Twenty-four hours following ureteral stent removal.

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Control2
Ketorolac1

[back to top]

Average Number of Days the Participant Missed Work

Determine amount of missed work or school due to renal colic following ureteral stent removal. (NCT04112160)
Timeframe: Seven days following stent removal.

Interventiondays of missed work (Mean)
Control2.3
Ketorolac2.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants That Experienced an Injection Complication

Determine if there is any infection site pain or reaction. Determine any complications related to administration of the medication. (NCT04112160)
Timeframe: Within thirty days post injection.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Control1
Ketorolac1

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale

Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain. (NCT04115644)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Group 1 (Control)3.447
Group 2 (Ketorolac)1.417
Group 3 (Kenalog)2.027

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale

Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale prior to first injection. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain. (NCT04115644)
Timeframe: Baseline - pre-injection

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Group 1 (Control)5.77
Group 2 (Ketorolac)4.57
Group 3 (Kenalog)4.67

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale

Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain. (NCT04115644)
Timeframe: Day 2

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Group 1 (Control)2.347
Group 2 (Ketorolac)2.837
Group 3 (Kenalog)2.67

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale

Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain. (NCT04115644)
Timeframe: Week 1

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Group 1 (Control)3.397
Group 2 (Ketorolac)3.7
Group 3 (Kenalog)3.257

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale

Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale after first injection. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain. (NCT04115644)
Timeframe: Baseline - immediately after the injection

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Group 1 (Control)3.197
Group 2 (Ketorolac)3.577
Group 3 (Kenalog)3.677

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale

Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain. (NCT04115644)
Timeframe: Week 2

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Group 1 (Control)3.547
Group 2 (Ketorolac)2.67
Group 3 (Kenalog)2.57

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale

Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain. (NCT04115644)
Timeframe: Week 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Group 1 (Control)3.357
Group 2 (Ketorolac)2.757
Group 3 (Kenalog)2.687

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale

Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain. (NCT04115644)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Group 1 (Control)3.547
Group 2 (Ketorolac)2.67
Group 3 (Kenalog)2.317

[back to top]

Narcotic Medication Consumed

Number of oxycodone- acetaminophen tablets consumed (NCT04246541)
Timeframe: up to 5 days postoperatively

Interventiontablets (Mean)
Control5.7
Ketorolac3.5

[back to top]

Pain Levels Recorded With a Visual Analogue Scale

Patients will record pain levels post-operatively using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 as the minimum value to 100 as the maximum value. A smaller VAS value will be considered a lower pain level. (NCT04246541)
Timeframe: 2 weeks postoperatively

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Control25.6
Ketorolac28.8

[back to top]

Postoperative Visual Analogue Scale Scores

Patients will record their pain on a visual analogue scale with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 100 where lower values indicate a lower pain level, and higher values indicate a higher pain level. (NCT04246554)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks postoperative

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Control50.4
Ketorolac40.0

[back to top]

Narcotic Medication

Number of oxycodone-acetaminophen tablets (NCT04246554)
Timeframe: 5 days

Interventiontablets (Mean)
Control12.4
Ketorolac5.5

[back to top]

Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R)

"Severity of PTSD symptoms; items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The IES-R yields a total score (ranging from 0 to 88); higher scores mean worse symptoms" (NCT04322968)
Timeframe: 24 hrs post-infusion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Chronic Pain With PTSD+IV Ketamine Infusion36.33333333
Chronic Pain With PTSD+IV Ketorolac Infusion37
Chronic Pain Without PTSD+IV Ketamine Infusion10.44444444
Chronic Pain Without PTSD+IV Ketorolac Infusion15.64705882

[back to top]

Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R)

"Severity of PTSD symptoms; items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The IES-R yields a total score (ranging from 0 to 88); higher scores mean worse symptoms" (NCT04322968)
Timeframe: 1 week post-infusion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Chronic Pain With PTSD+IV Ketamine Infusion28.22
Chronic Pain With PTSD+IV Ketorolac Infusion33.66666667
Chronic Pain Without PTSD+IV Ketamine Infusion11.44
Chronic Pain Without PTSD+IV Ketorolac Infusion13.41

[back to top]

Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form)

"Severity of pain, impact of pain on daily function, location of pain, pain medications and amount of pain relief in the past 24 hours or the past week; No scoring algorithm, but worst pain or the arithmetic mean of the four severity items can be used as measures of pain severity (a range of 0-10, with 10 being worse scores); the arithmetic mean of the seven interference items can be used as a measure of pain interference (a range of 0-10, with 10 being worse scores). The total score is reported for severity items and interference items, which range from 0-40 and 0-70, respectively. Higher values represent worse outcome." (NCT04322968)
Timeframe: 1 week post-infusion

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pain interference ScalePain severity Scale
Chronic Pain With PTSD+IV Ketamine Infusion38.6220.75
Chronic Pain With PTSD+IV Ketorolac Infusion25.6614.66
Chronic Pain Without PTSD+IV Ketamine Infusion9.6212.75
Chronic Pain Without PTSD+IV Ketorolac Infusion28.3322.66

[back to top]

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

"Severity of chronic pain symptoms; using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the no pain anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100; a higher score indicates greater pain intensity." (NCT04322968)
Timeframe: 24 hrs post-infusion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Chronic Pain With PTSD+IV Ketamine Infusion37.22222222
Chronic Pain With PTSD+IV Ketorolac Infusion49.66666667
Chronic Pain Without PTSD+IV Ketamine Infusion29.88888889
Chronic Pain Without PTSD+IV Ketorolac Infusion38.70588235

[back to top]

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

"Severity of chronic pain symptoms; using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the no pain anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100; a higher score indicates greater pain intensity." (NCT04322968)
Timeframe: 1 week post-infusion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Chronic Pain With PTSD+IV Ketamine Infusion48.22
Chronic Pain With PTSD+IV Ketorolac Infusion52.88
Chronic Pain Without PTSD+IV Ketamine Infusion43.33
Chronic Pain Without PTSD+IV Ketorolac Infusion48.23

[back to top]

Total Opioid Pain Medications Required 0-3h Post op in Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME)

Total opioid pain medications required 0-3h post op in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) (NCT04429022)
Timeframe: 0-3 hours after surgery

Interventionmorphine milligram equivalents (MME) (Mean)
Prospective Cohort2.00
Historical Control5.32

[back to top]

Pain Scores

Subjective, Score 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being severe pain (NCT04429022)
Timeframe: 3-24 hours after surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Prospective Cohort1.75
Historical Control5.43

[back to top]

Pain Scores

Subjective, Score 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being severe pain (NCT04429022)
Timeframe: 0-3 hours after surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Prospective Cohort3.82
Historical Control5.13

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Return to the Clinic, Emergency Department Due to Post Operative Pain Within a 2 Week Period

Number of patients with return to the clinic, emergency department due to post operative pain within a 2 week period (NCT04429022)
Timeframe: 0-14 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Prospective Cohort1
Historical Control3

[back to top]

Length of Stay in Hours

Length of stay in hours (NCT04429022)
Timeframe: 0- 240 hours

Interventionhours (Mean)
Prospective Cohort12.05
Historical Control35.82

[back to top]

Estimated Blood Loss

milliliters (mL) (NCT04429022)
Timeframe: 0-300 minutes

Interventionmilliliters (Mean)
Prospective Cohort63.50
Historical Control58.46

[back to top]

Total Opioid Pain Medications Required Through 3-24h Post op in MME

Total opioid pain medications required through 3-24h post op in MME (NCT04429022)
Timeframe: 3-24 hours after surgery

Interventionmorphine milligram equivalents (MME) (Mean)
Prospective Cohort.20
Historical Control12.27

[back to top]

Operative Time

minutes (NCT04429022)
Timeframe: 0-300 minutes

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Prospective Cohort128.80
Historical Control139.69

[back to top]