Page last updated: 2024-12-05

pioglitazone

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione (TZD) antidiabetic drug that acts as an agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ). PPARγ is a nuclear receptor that regulates gene expression involved in glucose metabolism, insulin sensitivity, and adipocyte differentiation. Pioglitazone improves insulin sensitivity by increasing glucose uptake and utilization in peripheral tissues, such as skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. It also reduces hepatic glucose production. Pioglitazone is used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients who have inadequate glycemic control with diet and exercise alone. It can also be used in combination with other antidiabetic medications. The synthesis of pioglitazone involves multiple steps, including a nucleophilic aromatic substitution reaction, a Grignard reaction, and a final step that involves a cyclization reaction to form the thiazolidinedione ring. Pioglitazone is studied extensively because of its unique mechanism of action and its potential to improve the management of type 2 diabetes. It is also being studied for its potential use in the treatment of other conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, and inflammatory diseases.'

Pioglitazone: A thiazolidinedione and PPAR GAMMA agonist that is used in the treatment of TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

pioglitazone : A member of the class of thiazolidenediones that is 1,3-thiazolidine-2,4-dione substituted by a benzyl group at position 5 which in turn is substituted by a 2-(5-ethylpyridin-2-yl)ethoxy group at position 4 of the phenyl ring. It exhibits hypoglycemic activity. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID4829
CHEBI ID8228
SCHEMBL ID4121
MeSH IDM0168845

Synonyms (147)

Synonym
AC-1021
STL309607
5-{4-[2-(5-ethylpyridin-2-yl)ethoxy]benzyl}-4-hydroxy-1,3-thiazol-2(5h)-one
AB00698454-10
BRD-A48430263-003-02-4
unii-x4ov71u42s
x4ov71u42s ,
piozone
pioglu
gtpl2694
u-72107
zactos
glustin
SPECTRUM5_001480
CHEBI:8228 ,
pioglitazonum
pioglitazona
SPECTRUM_001623
BSPBIO_002723
actos
2,4-thiazolidinedione, 5-[[4-[2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridinyl)ethoxy]phenyl]methyl]- (9ci)
2,4-thiazolidinedione, 5-[[4-[2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridinyl)ethoxy]phenyl]methyl]-, (+/-)-
(+/-)-5-[p-[2-(ethyl-2-pyridyl)ethoxy]benzyl]-2,4-thiazolidinedione
5-[4-[2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridyl)ethoxy]benzyl]thiazolidine-2,4-dione
2,4-thiazolidinedione, 5-[[4-[2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridinyl)ethoxy]phenyl]methyl]-
u 72107
(+/-)-5-[[4-[2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridinyl)-ethoxy]phenyl]methyl]-2,4-thiazolidinedione
ad-4833
5-[[4-[2-[(5-ethyl-2-pyridyl)]ethoxy]phenyl]methyl]thiazolidine- 2,4-dione
5-[[4-[2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridinyl)ethoxy]phenyl]methyl]-2,4-thiazolidinedione
111025-46-8
C07675
pioglitazone
DB01132
5-{4-[2-(5-ethylpyridin-2-yl)ethoxy]benzyl}-1,3-thiazolidine-2,4-dione
(+/-)-5-((4-(2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridinyl)ethoxy)phenyl)methyl)-2,4-thiazolidinedione
actos (tn)
SPECTRUM5_002067
NCGC00163128-01
hsdb 7322
5-(4-(2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridyl)ethoxy)benzyl)-2,4-thiazolidinedione
pioglitazona [inn-spanish]
pioglitazonum [inn-latin]
c19h20n2o3s
2,4-thiazolidinedione, 5-((4-(2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridinyl)ethoxy)phenyl)methyl)-, (+-)-
pioglitazone [inn:ban]
KBIO2_004671
KBIOGR_001619
KBIO2_007239
KBIO2_002103
KBIOSS_002103
KBIO3_001943
SPECTRUM3_001002
SPECTRUM2_001679
SPBIO_001897
SPECTRUM4_001130
NCGC00163128-02
HMS2089H14
D08378
pioglitazone (inn)
5-[[4-[2-(5-ethylpyridin-2-yl)ethoxy]phenyl]methyl]-1,3-thiazolidine-2,4-dione
(5s)-5-[[4-[2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridyl)ethoxy]phenyl]methyl]thiazolidine-2,4-dione;pioglitazone
A802277
NCGC00163128-03
NCGC00163128-05
NCGC00163128-04
105355-27-9
pharmakon1600-01504401
nsc758876
pioglitazone [ban:inn]
FT-0601906
FT-0645030
NCGC00163128-07
STL373406
NCGC00163128-06
AKOS015894953
S2590
5-[4-[2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridyl)ethoxy]benzyl]-2,4-thiazolidinedione
AKOS022109420
pioglitazone [vandf]
pioglitazone [inn]
198077-89-3
5-((4-(2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridinyl)ethoxy)phenyl)methyl)-2,4-thiazolidinedione
pioglitazone [mi]
pioglitazone [ema epar]
5-(4-(2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridyl)ethoxy)benzyl)thiazolidine-2,4-dione
2,4-thiazolidinedione, 5-((4-(2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridinyl)ethoxy)phenyl)methyl)-, (+/-)-
5-(4-(2-(5-ethylpyridin-2-yl)ethoxy)benzyl)thiazolidine-2,4-dione
pioglitazone [hsdb]
pioglitazone [iarc]
2,4-thiazolidinedione, 5-((4-(2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridinyl)ethoxy)phenyl)methyl)-
pioglitazone [who-dd]
(rs)-5-(4-(2-(5-ethylpyridin-2-yl)ethoxy)benzyl)thiazolidine-2,4-dione
(+/-)-5-(p-(2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridyl)ethoxy)benzyl)-2,4-thiazolidinedione
CCG-220107
CS-1700
HY-13956
MLS006011848
smr002204015
BBL029068
SCHEMBL4121
HS-0047 ,
5-{4-[2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridyl)ethoxy]benzyl}-2,4thiazolidinedione
5-[4-[2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridyl) ethoxy]benzyl]-2,4-thiazolidinedione
5-{4-[2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridyl)ethoxy]benzyl}-2,4-thiazolidinedione
5-[[4-[2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridyl)ethoxy] phenyl]methyl]-2,4-thiazolidinedione
HYAFETHFCAUJAY-UHFFFAOYSA-N
5-(4-(2-(5-ethylpyridin-2-yl)ethoxy)benzyl)-thiazolidine-2,4-dione
HB4139
5-[[4-[2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridinyl)ethoxy]phenyl]methyl-2,4-thiazolidinedione
AB00698454_13
AB00698454_11
AB00698454_12
DTXSID3037129 ,
5-({4-[2-(5-ethylpyridin-2-yl)ethoxy]phenyl}methyl)-1,3-thiazolidine-2,4-dione
J-002506
J-516181
sr-01000763737
SR-01000763737-5
HMS3651D09
mfcd00865504
bdbm50103521
SBI-0206791.P001
HMS3712E16
[()-5-[[4-[2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridinyl) ethoxy] phenyl] methyl]-2,4-] thiazolidinedione monohydrochlorid
SW197561-3
[( inverted exclamation marka)-5-[[4-[2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridinyl) ethoxy] phenyl] methyl]-2,4-] thiazolidinedione monohydrochlorid
5-[4-[2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridyl)eth-oxy]benzyl]-2,4-thiazolidinedione
EN300-117258
pioglitazone (actos)
BCP26474
Q417765
BRD-A48430263-003-06-5
SB17323
HMS3884L10
SY017473
pioglitazone-[d4]
BP164273
pioglitazone- bio-x
Z1501480426
pioglitazonum (latin)
pioglitazona (inn-spanish)
pioglitazonum (inn-latin)
dtxcid1017129
5-(4-(2-(5-ethylpyridin-2-yl)ethoxy)benzyl)-1,3-thiazolidine-2,4-dione
pioglitazone (iarc)
a10bg03

Research Excerpts

Overview

Pioglitazone (Pio) is a Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for type-2 diabetes. It binds and activates the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) Piog litazone is a potent insulin-sensitizing drug with anti-atherosclerotic properties.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Pioglitazone (Pio) is a Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for type-2 diabetes that binds and activates the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), yet it remains unclear how in vivo Pio metabolites affect PPARγ structure and function. "( Structural Basis of Altered Potency and Efficacy Displayed by a Major in Vivo Metabolite of the Antidiabetic PPARγ Drug Pioglitazone.
Brust, R; Eberhardt, J; Forli, S; Griffin, PR; Kojetin, DJ; Mosure, SA; Shang, J; Zheng, J, 2019
)
2.16
"Pioglitazone is a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR) agonist of the thiazolidinedione class of compounds with promising anticancer activity. "( Quantitative measurement of pioglitazone in neoplastic and normal tissues by AP-MALDI mass spectrometry imaging.
Bello, E; Ceruti, T; D'Incalci, M; Davoli, E; Frapolli, R; Fuso Nerini, I; Matteo, C; Meroni, M; Morosi, L; Zucchetti, M, 2022
)
2.46
"Pioglitazone is an oral antidiabetic drug."( Preparation and Evaluation of Polyvinylpyrrolidone Electrospun Nanofiber Patches of Pioglitazone for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis.
Aljarrah, M; Hamed, R; Obaidat, R; Shameh, AA, 2022
)
1.67
"Pioglitazone is an agonist of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) whose pleiotrophic activities include modulation of cellular energy metabolism and reduction in inflammation."( Systemic Treatment with Pioglitazone Reverses Vision Loss in Preclinical Glaucoma Models.
Dumitrescu, AV; Elwood, BW; Gramlich, OW; Kuehn, MH; Wadkins, D; Zeng, H, 2022
)
1.75
"Pioglitazone is a potent insulin-sensitizing drug with anti-atherosclerotic properties, but adverse effects have limited its use. "( Efficacy of lower doses of pioglitazone after stroke or transient ischaemic attack in patients with insulin resistance.
Abdul-Ghani, M; Dandona, P; DeFronzo, R; Furie, K; Inzucchi, SE; Kernan, WN; Spence, JD; Viscoli, C; Young, LH, 2022
)
2.46
"Pioglitazone is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) agonist shown to prevent lung tumors in preclinical models."( PPARgamma agonism inhibits progression of premalignant lesions in a murine lung squamous cell carcinoma model.
Alavi, K; Dwyer-Nield, LD; Ghosh, M; Hudish, LI; Hudish, TM; Keith, RL; McArthur, DG; Merrick, DT; Mirita, C; Smith, AJ; Sompel, K; Tennis, MA, 2022
)
1.44
"As pioglitazone is an insulin sens MSDC-itizer used for diabetes, its MPC inhibitory effect in diabetic individuals was investigated."( Inactivation of mitochondrial pyruvate carrier promotes NLRP3 inflammasome activation and gout development via metabolic reprogramming.
Chen, CC; Chen, LC; Chen, YJ; Chien, WC; Chung, CH; Huang, CN; Huang, KY; Liao, NS; Lin, HA; Lin, HC; Lin, YY; Ojcius, DM; Shih, CT; Tsai, KJ; Wang, JY, 2023
)
1.42
"Pioglitazone (Pio) is an approved diabetes medicine with proven efficacy in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH); PXL065 is a novel related oral agent which has been shown to retain Pio's efficacy in preclinical NASH models, with reduced potential for PPARγ-driven side effects. "( Evaluation of PXL065 - deuterium-stabilized (R)-pioglitazone in patients with NASH: A phase II randomized placebo-controlled trial (DESTINY-1).
Bedossa, P; Bolze, S; Cusi, K; Dewitt, S; Dubourg, J; Fouqueray, P; Grouin, JM; Hallakou-Bozec, S; Harrison, SA; Moller, DE; Ratziu, V; Thang, C, 2023
)
2.61
"Pioglitazone (Pio) is an approved diabetes medicine with proven efficacy in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH); PXL065 is a novel related oral agent which has been shown to retain Pio's efficacy in preclinical NASH models, with reduced potential for PPARγ-driven side effects. "( Evaluation of PXL065 - deuterium-stabilized (R)-pioglitazone in patients with NASH: A phase II randomized placebo-controlled trial (DESTINY-1).
Bedossa, P; Bolze, S; Cusi, K; Dewitt, S; Dubourg, J; Fouqueray, P; Grouin, JM; Hallakou-Bozec, S; Harrison, SA; Moller, DE; Ratziu, V; Thang, C, 2023
)
2.61
"Pioglitazone is an insulin resistance inhibitor widely used as monotherapy or combined with metformin or insulin in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). "( Pioglitazone use increases risk of Alzheimer's disease in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin.
Chen, CC; Chen, LC; Chien, WC; Chung, CH; Huang, KY; Lin, HA; Lin, HC; Tsai, MH; Wang, JY, 2023
)
3.8
"Pioglitazone is an antidiabetic drug showing potential for memory improvement."( Neuropharmacological studies on repurposed utilization of pioglitazone in learning and memory: A dose related study.
Darakhshan Jabeen Haleem, -; Huma Ikram, -; Rabia Masood, -; Shazia Syed, -, 2023
)
1.88
"Pioglitazone is an insulin sensitizer used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. "( Pioglitazone-Enhanced Brown Fat Whitening Contributes to Weight Gain in Diet-Induced Obese Mice.
Cheng, L; Cheng, Y; Guo, W; Shen, Y; Wan, Z; Wang, W; Xu, F; Yu, P, 2023
)
3.8
"Pioglitazone is an agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) and shows anti-inflammatory effects in multiple diseases."( Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist pioglitazone alleviates hemorrhage-induced thalamic pain and neuroinflammation.
Ai, Y; He, L; Li, D; Yang, JJ; Yuan, C, 2023
)
1.88
"Pioglitazone (PGZ) is an oral antidiabetic agent that increases cell resistance to insulin, thereby decreasing blood glucose levels. "( Co-stabilization of pioglitazone HCL nanoparticles prepared by planetary ball milling:
Abou El Ela, AES; Almeanazel, OT; Alsaif, S; Alshora, DH; Ashri, LY; Ezzeldin, E; Ibrahim, MA, 2020
)
2.32
"Pioglitazone is a promising therapeutic method for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients with or without type 2 diabetes. "( Gender differences in the efficacy of pioglitazone treatment in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients with abnormal glucose metabolism.
Chang, X; Gao, J; Ma, S; Wang, L; Wu, W; Xia, M; Yan, H, 2021
)
2.34
"Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione oral antidiabetic agent. "( Pioglitazone Enhances β-Arrestin2 Signaling and Ameliorates Insulin Resistance in Classical Insulin Target Tissues.
El-Fayoumi, S; Fahmy, A; Ibrahim, I; Mahmoud, A; Mansour, R, 2021
)
3.51
"Pioglitazone is a drug primarily used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus."( The Protective Effects of Pioglitazone Against Cognitive Impairment Caused by L-methionine Administration in a Rat Model.
Al-Azzam, SI; Alfaqih, M; Alrabadi, N; Alzoubi, KH; Khabour, OF; Mhaidat, NM; Tashtoush, M, 2022
)
1.74
"Pioglitazone is an FDA-approved PPAR-γ agonist drug used to treat diabetes, and it has demonstrated neuroprotective effects in multiple models of central nervous system (CNS) injury. "( Pioglitazone treatment following spinal cord injury maintains acute mitochondrial integrity and increases chronic tissue sparing and functional recovery.
Bailey, WM; Cox, DH; Geldenhuys, WJ; Gensel, JC; Gollihue, JL; Patel, SP; Rabchevsky, AG; Sullivan, PG, 2017
)
3.34
"Pioglitazone is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonist with a variety of anti-inflammatory effects."( Immunomodulation in systemic lupus erythematosus: induction of M2 population in monocyte-derived macrophages by pioglitazone.
Memarian, A; Mohammadi, S; Saghaeian-Jazi, M; Sedighi, S, 2017
)
1.39
"Pioglitazone is a safe and effective option to manage patients with type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). "( Concentration-dependent response to pioglitazone in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.
Bril, F; Cusi, K; Frye, RF; Kalavalapalli, S; Kawaguchi-Suzuki, M, 2017
)
2.17
"Pioglitazone is an important prescription antidiabetic drug with positive roles in controlling high blood sugar in patients with type 2 diabetes. "( Activation of catalase by pioglitazone: Multiple spectroscopic methods combined with molecular docking studies.
Dehghan, G; Moosavi-Movahedi, AA; Rashtbari, S; Sheibani, N; Yekta, R, 2017
)
2.2
"Pioglitazone is a pharmacologic agonist of peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) that was reported to ameliorate hepatic steatosis and inflammatory changes."( Pioglitazone suppresses inflammation and fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by down-regulating PDGF and TIMP-2: Evidence from in vitro study.
Deng, W; Meng, Z; Sun, A; Yang, Z, 2017
)
2.62
"Pioglitazone is an anti-diabetic agent that belongs to the thiazolidinedione class, which target peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), a transcription factor in the nuclear receptor family. "( Pioglitazone inhibits cancer cell growth through STAT3 inhibition and enhanced AIF expression via a PPARγ-independent pathway.
Imano, M; Itoh, T; Kawashima, K; Nishida, S; Satou, T; Takeda, T; Tomonari, Y; Tsubaki, M, 2018
)
3.37
"Pioglitazone is an effective drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. "( Hybrid drug combination: Anti-diabetic treatment of type 2 diabetic Wistar rats with combination of ellagic acid and pioglitazone.
Doble, M; Nankar, RP, 2017
)
2.11
"Pioglitazone (PIO) is a thiazolidindione antidiabetic agent which improves insulin sensitivity and reduces blood glucose in experimental animals and treated patients. "( Effects of pioglitazone on ventricular myocyte shortening and Ca(2+) transport in the Goto-Kakizaki type 2 diabetic rat.
Howarth, FC; Oz, M; Qureshi, M; Salem, KA; Sydorenko, V, 2018
)
2.31
"Pioglitazone (PGZ) is an agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), a nuclear receptor that regulates important cellular functions, including inflammatory responses."( Human Skin Permeation Studies with PPARγ Agonist to Improve Its Permeability and Efficacy in Inflammatory Processes.
Calpena, AC; Espina, M; Espinoza, LC; Fábrega, MJ; García, ML; Rodríguez-Lagunas, MJ; Silva-Abreu, M, 2017
)
1.18
"Pioglitazone (PGZ), which is a class II Biopharmaceutical Classification System drug has a slight solubility in water and a slow rate of dissolution, which may have a negative effect on its metabolism leading to a therapeutic failure."( Nanocrystalization of Pioglitazone by Precipitation Method.
Ahmadipour, S; Tabbakhian, M; Varshosaz, J, 2018
)
1.52
"Pioglitazone is an extremely useful agent in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) through its actions on alleviating insulin resistance."( Effect of Low (7.5 mg/day), Standard (15 mg/ day) and High (30 mg/day) Dose Pioglitazone Therapy on Glycemic Control and Weight Gain in Recently-Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Patients.
Deogaonkar, N; Hoskote, SS; Joshi, SR; Kale, NJ; Panikar, V, 2015
)
1.37
"Pioglitazone is an antidiabetic drug used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. "( Study on the interaction of antidiabetic drug Pioglitazone with calf thymus DNA using spectroscopic techniques.
Ahmad, N; Al Qumaizi, KI; Alosaimi, SM; Anwer, R; Fatma, T, 2018
)
2.18
"Pioglitazone is an effective agent for chemoprevention in rodents and could be repurposed as a multi-targeted drug for delaying liver fibrosis and hepatocarcinogenesis."( Pioglitazone Reduces Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development in Two Rodent Models of Cirrhosis.
Arora, G; Baumert, TF; Erstad, DJ; Fuchs, BC; Ghoshal, S; Hoshida, Y; Lanuti, M; Li, S; Masia, R; Sojoodi, M; Tanabe, KK, 2019
)
3.4
"Pioglitazone (PGZ) is a member of the thiazolidinedione (TZDs) family of drugs and it is primarily used to treat type 2 diabetes. "( Thiazolidinedione as an alternative to facilitate oral administration in geriatric patients with Alzheimer's disease.
Calpena, AC; Espina, M; Espinoza, LC; García, ML; Gonzalez-Pizarro, R; Rodríguez-Lagunas, MJ; Silva-Abreu, M, 2019
)
1.96
"Pioglitazone is a potent insulin sensitizer, preserves beta-cell function, causes durable reduction in HbA1c, corrects multiple components of metabolic syndrome and improves nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis."( Pioglitazone: The forgotten, cost-effective cardioprotective drug for type 2 diabetes.
Abdul-Ghani, M; DeFronzo, RA; Inzucchi, S; Nissen, SE, 2019
)
2.68
"Pioglitazone is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) agonist and is widely used to treat type 2 diabetes."( Low-dose pioglitazone can ameliorate learning and memory impairment in a mouse model of dementia by increasing LRP1 expression in the hippocampus.
Cha, BS; Kang, ES; Kim, E; Lee, BW; Lee, HC; Lee, M; Lee, PH; Lee, YH; Moon, JH; Seok, H; Shin, E; Yun, MR, 2019
)
1.65
"Pioglitazone (PGZ) is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist. "( Nanoemulsion strategy of pioglitazone for the treatment of skin inflammatory diseases.
Calpena, AC; Clares, B; Espinoza, LC; Fábrega, MJ; Garduño-Ramírez, ML; Rodríguez-Lagunas, MJ; Silva-Abreu, M, 2019
)
2.26
"Pioglitazone is an oral antidiabetic drug with multiple pleiotropic actions. "( Effect of pioglitazone in acute ischemic stroke patients with diabetes mellitus: a nested case-control study.
Kim, J; Lee, HS; Woo, MH, 2019
)
2.36
"Pioglitazone (PGZ) is an antidiabetic agent belongs to thiazolidinediones. "( Physicochemical and pharmacodynamic evaluation of pioglitazone binary systems with hydrophilic carriers.
Abou El Ela, AESF; Al-Amin, MA; Al-Rasheed, NM; Ibrahim, MA, 2019
)
2.21
"Pioglitazone is an effective multidrug resistance reversal agent for tumors."( [Reversal Effect of Pioglitazone on Multidrug Resistance in K562/ADR Cells and Its Mechanism].
Cao, WJ; Dang, HB; Wan, DM; Wei, YJ; Zhang, C; Zhang, Y, 2019
)
1.56
"Pioglitazone (PIO) is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist widely repositioned as an adjuvant of various drugs that have toxic effects due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects."( Pioglitazone as an adjuvant of amphotericin B for the treatment of cryptococcosis.
Carmo, PHF; Costa, MC; de Brito, CB; de Souza, DG; Emídio, ECP; Freitas, GJC; Paixão, TA; Ribeiro, NQ; Santos, APN; Santos, DA; Silva, MF, 2019
)
2.68
"Pioglitazone is a PPARγ agonist that is widely used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus."( The effect of sex hormones on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma expression and activity in mature adipocytes.
Funaki, A; Ishikawa, M; Kimura, Y; Kurosaki, H; Sato, H; Sugai, H; Ueno, K, 2013
)
1.11
"Pioglitazone is a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) agonist used for the treatment of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. "( Activation of PPARγ by pioglitazone potentiates the effects of naltrexone on alcohol drinking and relapse in msP rats.
Cannella, N; Ciccocioppo, R; Cippitelli, A; de Guglielmo, G; Demopulos, G; Gaitanaris, G; Heilig, M; Kallupi, M; Somaini, L; Stopponi, S; Ubaldi, M, 2013
)
2.14
"Pioglitazone is a stimulator of nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma while alogliptin is a selective dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor. "( Enhancing pancreatic Beta-cell regeneration in vivo with pioglitazone and alogliptin.
Bell, GI; Chong, AS; Grossman, EJ; Misawa, R; Park, SY; Tao, J; Wang, XJ; Witkowski, P; Yin, H; Zhong, R, 2013
)
2.08
"Pioglitazone (PIO) is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ agonist insulin-sensitiser with anti-inflammatory and anti-atherosclerotic effects. "( Pioglitazone improves glucose metabolism and modulates skeletal muscle TIMP-3-TACE dyad in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, mechanistic study.
Andreozzi, F; Chavez-Velasquez, A; Daniele, G; Defronzo, RA; Fanti, P; Federici, M; Fiorentino, TV; Folli, F; Gastaldelli, A; Jenkinson, C; Kamath, S; Perez-Cadena, Z; Tripathy, D, 2013
)
3.28
"Pioglitazone (PIO) is a member of the thiazolidinediones - a group of insulin-sensitizing drugs that are selective agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ)."( Pioglitazone does not improve insulin signaling in mice with GH over-expression.
Bartke, A; Gesing, A; Masternak, MM, 2013
)
2.55
"Pioglitazone is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ agonist and, although it is mostly used as an antidiabetic agent, it has been reported to have analgesic effects."( Antinociceptive and antidiarrheal effects of pioglitazone in a rat model of diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: role of nitric oxide.
Azary, S; Dehpour, AR; Gharedaghi, MH; Javidan, AN; Kazemi, MH; Khalifeh-Soltani, A; Moradi, K; Paragomi, P; Rahimian, R; Sakuma, S, 2014
)
1.38
"Pioglitazone is an anti-diabetic agent with recognized antifibrotic and vasculoprotective properties, which can protect smooth muscle function."( Pioglitazone prevents cavernosal nerve injury after radical prostatectomy.
Aliperti, LA; Hellstrom, WJ, 2014
)
2.57
"Pioglitazone is an insulin-sensitizing agent and can reduce insulin resistance."( The endothelial protective effects of pioglitazone on insulin resistance in endothelial cells.
Jin, J; Kong, J; Yang, O; Zeng, H, 2014
)
1.39
"Pioglitazone is a member of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonists, particularly used in management of type II diabetes. "( Anti-pruritic activity of pioglitazone on serotonin-induced scratching in mice: possible involvement of PPAR-gamma receptor and nitric oxide.
Dehpour, A; Imran khan, M; Ostadhadi, S; Rajaba, A; Rastegar, H; Shafizadeh, M, 2014
)
2.15
"Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione drug that acts as an insulin sensitizer. "( Effects of pioglitazone on cardiac and adipose tissue pathology in rats with metabolic syndrome.
Asano, C; Hattori, T; Ito, S; Matsuura, N; Minagawa, Y; Murohara, T; Nagasawa, K; Nagata, K; Sano, Y; Watanabe, S; Yamada, Y, 2015
)
2.25
"Pioglitazone (PIO) is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) agonist in clinical use for treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). "( Effects of low doses of pioglitazone on resting-state functional connectivity in conscious rat brain.
Asin, K; Crenshaw, DG; Gottschalk, WK; Liang, Z; Roses, AD; Zhang, N, 2015
)
2.17
"Pioglitazone is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-γ agonist that exhibits anti-inflammatory activity and is neuroprotective."( Pioglitazone blocks ethanol induction of microglial activation and immune responses in the hippocampus, cerebellum, and cerebral cortex in a mouse model of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders.
Douglas, JC; Drew, PD; Johnson, JW; Kane, CJ; Phelan, KD, 2015
)
2.58
"Pioglitazone is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ antidiabetic agent with antiproliferative effects on smooth muscle cells (SMCs), and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory actions."( The possible protective effect of simvastatin and pioglitazone separately and in combination on bleomycin-induced changes in mice thin skin.
Balaha, M; Kandeel, S, 2015
)
1.39
"Pioglitazone (Pio) is a PPARγ agonist used clinically as an anti-diabetic agent for improving insulin sensitivity in patients with diabetes."( Local release of pioglitazone (a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonist) accelerates proliferation and remodeling phases of wound healing.
Kishi, K; Sakai, S; Sato, K; Tabata, Y,
)
1.19
"Pioglitazone (PTZ) is an oral antidiabetic agent whose anti-cancer properties have been described recently. "( Genotoxic investigation of a thiazolidinedione PPARγ agonist using the in vitro micronucleus test and the in vivo homozygotization assay.
de Castro-Prado, MA; Franco, CC; Mathias, PC; Morais, JF; Pereira, TS; Sant'Anna, JR, 2016
)
1.88
"Pioglitazone is an insulin-sensitizing thiazolidinedione (TZD) whose use is associated with bone loss. "( In Vitro Effects of Pioglitazone on the Expression of Components of Wnt Signaling Pathway and Markers of Bone Mineralization.
Avtanski, D; Babushkin, N; Hirth, Y; Poretsky, L; Seto-Young, D; Sharma, D; Sy, V, 2016
)
2.2
"Pioglitazone is an antidiabetic agent with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties."( The effects of pioglitazone adjuvant therapy on negative symptoms of patients with chronic schizophrenia: a double-blind and placebo-controlled trial.
Akhondzadeh, S; Esalatmanesh, S; Farokhnia, M; Goguol, A; Iranpour, N; Khodaie-Ardakani, MR; Mohammadinejad, P; Salehi, B; Yekehtaz, H; Zandifar, A; Zeinoddini, A; Zeionoddini, A, 2016
)
1.51
"Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione antidiabetic with actions similar to those of rosiglitazone. "( Pioglitazone.
Abdel Aziz, HA; Al-Jenoobi, FI; Al-Majed, A; Alharbi, H; Bakheit, AH, 2016
)
3.32
"Pioglitazone is a type of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor x03B3; agonist and is capable of alleviating renal ischemia-reperfusion injury."( Pioglitazone, a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor x03B3; Agonist, Ameliorates Chronic Kidney Disease by Enhancing Antioxidative Capacity and Attenuating Angiogenesis in the Kidney of a 5/6 Nephrectomized Rat Model.
Feng, J; Lu, C; Ma, J; Sun, L; Wang, D; Wang, L; Xu, T; Yao, L; Yuan, Q, 2016
)
3.32
"Pioglitazone is a widely used anti-diabetic drug that induces cytotoxicity in cancer cells; however, its clinical use is questioned due to its associated liver toxicity caused by increased oxidative stress. "( Redox nanoparticle increases the chemotherapeutic efficiency of pioglitazone and suppresses its toxic side effects.
Nagasaki, Y; Sakharkar, MK; Thangavel, S; Yoshitomi, T, 2016
)
2.12
"Pioglitazone is a synthetic agonist for the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. "( Pioglitazone increases the glycolytic efficiency of human Sertoli cells with possible implications for spermatogenesis.
Alves, MG; Barros, A; Bernardino, RL; Meneses, MJ; Oliveira, PF; Sá, R; Silva, BM; Silva, J; Sousa, M, 2016
)
3.32
"Pioglitazone (AD4833) is an insulin sensitizer of the thiazolidinedione class of nuclear Peroxisome-Proliferator Activated Receptor γ (PPARγ) agonists."( Pioglitazone for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
Galimberti, D; Scarpini, E, 2017
)
2.62
"Pioglitazone is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) full agonist and useful for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. "( Naringenin interferes with the anti-diabetic actions of pioglitazone via pharmacodynamic interactions.
Atsumi, T; Kurokawa, M; Narumi, K; Sugita, C; Tsuhako, R; Watanabe, W; Yoshida, H, 2017
)
2.14
"Pioglitazone is a PPARγ agonist commonly prescribed for the clinical treatment of diabetes. "( Safety and Preclinical Efficacy of Aerosol Pioglitazone on Lung Adenoma Prevention in A/J Mice.
Antonides, JD; Galbraith, AR; Haynes, AM; Miller, KA; Miller, WA; O'Sullivan, MG; Ondrey, FG; Seabloom, DE; Steele, VE; Suen, CS; Wuertz, BR, 2017
)
2.16
"Pioglitazone at 15 mg/kg/d is a viable chemopreventive agent at early-stage interventions."( Fixed-Dose Combinations of Pioglitazone and Metformin for Lung Cancer Prevention.
Antonides, JD; Clapper, ML; Galbraith, AR; Haynes, AM; Miller, KA; Miller, MS; Miller, WA; O'Sullivan, MG; Ondrey, FG; Seabloom, DE; Steele, VE; Wuertz, BR, 2017
)
1.47
"Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione antihyperglycemic drug with insulin-sensitizing properties. "( Effects of functional CYP2C8,CYP2C9,CYP3A5,and ABCB1 genetic variants on the pharmacokinetics of insulin sensitizer pioglitazone in Chinese Han individuals.
Li, P; Lou, YQ; Lu, C; Lu, Y; Qi, GZ; Qi, HM; Wang, X; Wei, MJ; Yin, SJ; Zhang, GL; Zhang, P, 2017
)
2.11
"Pioglitazone is an anti-diabetic drug with potential to cause adverse effects following prolonged use. "( Quercetin and pioglitazone synergistically reverse endothelial dysfunction in isolated aorta from fructose-streptozotocin (F-STZ)-induced diabetic rats.
Achike, FI; Kunasegaran, T; Murugan, DD; Mustafa, MR, 2017
)
2.26
"Pioglitazone is a time- and dose-dependent protective factor against dementia in patients with diabetes. "( Effects of pioglitazone on the incidence of dementia in patients with diabetes.
Chou, PS; Ho, BL; Yang, YH, 2017
)
2.29
"Pioglitazone is an antidiabetic drug that targets insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by stimulating the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma. "( Monitoring the safety of pioglitazone : results of a prescription-event monitoring study of 12,772 patients in England.
Kasliwal, R; Shakir, SA; Wilton, LV, 2008
)
2.09
"Pioglitazone is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist that decreases insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus. "( Massive bilateral pleural effusion associated with use of pioglitazone.
Chen, HH; Chen, YC; Chen, YW; Wu, CJ, 2008
)
2.03
"Pioglitazone is a widely used anti-type 2 diabetic drug. "( Mechanisms underlying pioglitazone-mediated relaxation in isolated blood vessel.
Hara, Y; Mukohda, M; Nomura, H; Okada, M; Yamawaki, H, 2008
)
2.1
"Pioglitazone is an antidiabetic drug that belongs to the thiazolidinedione (TZD) class of insulin-sensitizing agents. "( Risk management and outcomes of adverse events to pioglitazone in primary care in the UK: an observational study.
Fogg, C; Kasliwal, R; Shakir, SA, 2009
)
2.05
"Pioglitazone is an FDA-approved peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) agonist. "( Effects of pioglitazone on diffusion tensor imaging indices in multiple sclerosis patients.
Feinstein, DL; Kaiser, CC; Shukla, DK; Stebbins, GT, 2010
)
2.19
"Pioglitazone is an insulin-sensitizing agent that has been reported to have anti-arteriosclerotic effects. "( Effect of pioglitazone on various parameters of insulin resistance including lipoprotein subclass according to particle size by a gel-permeation high-performance liquid chromatography in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes.
Adachi, T; Fujinami, A; Fukui, M; Hara, H; Hasegawa, G; Ishihara, K; Kitagawa, Y; Nakamura, N; Nakano, K; Obayashi, H; Ogata, M; Ohta, M; Takashima, T; Yamasaki, M, 2010
)
2.21
"Pioglitazone is an oral antidiabetic agent that decreases insulin resistance in adipose tissue, liver and muscles. "( Pioglitazone: beyond glucose control.
de Pablos-Velasco, P, 2010
)
3.25
"Pioglitazone is a potent insulin sensitizer, improves pancreatic beta cell function and has been shown in several outcome trials to lower the risk of atherosclerotic and cardiovascular events."( Pioglitazone and alogliptin combination therapy in type 2 diabetes: a pathophysiologically sound treatment.
Cersosimo, E; DeFronzo, RA; Triplitt, C, 2010
)
2.52
"Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione that displays high affinity for PPARγ(1) and PPARγ(2), which are predominately expressed in adipose tissue."( Efficacy and tolerability of pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: comparison with other oral antihyperglycaemic agents.
Derosa, G, 2010
)
1.37
"Pioglitazone is a medicine of thiazolidinedione (TZD) class with hypoglycemic (antihyperglycemic, antidiabetic) action. "( Interaction study of pioglitazone with albumin by fluorescence spectroscopy and molecular docking.
Faridbod, F; Ganjali, MR; Hosseini, M; Larijani, B; Norouzi, P; Pillip, C; Riahi, S; Saboury, AA, 2011
)
2.13
"Pioglitazone (PG) is an insulin-sensitizing drug used in humans that is absorbed after oral administration to horses."( Effects of the insulin-sensitizing drug pioglitazone and lipopolysaccharide administration on insulin sensitivity in horses.
Corl, BA; Crisman, MV; Geor, RJ; Hulver, MW; McCutcheon, LJ; Suagee, JK; Wearn, JG,
)
1.12
"Pioglitazone is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) activator used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (DM2) patients and it has been suggested that can induce bone loss. "( Tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 expression in leukocytes and their association with polymorphisms and bone markers in diabetic individuals treated with pioglitazone.
Arazi, SS; Bertolami, A; Bertolami, MC; Faludi, A; Farjado, CM; Garofalo, A; Himelfarb, ST; Hirata, MH; Hirata, RD; Rezende, AA; Sampaio, MF; Silva, FA, 2011
)
2.01
"Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione class of antidiabetic agent with proven efficacy in increasing insulin sensitivity in humans with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, a syndrome of insulin resistance sharing similarities with equine metabolic syndrome. "( Pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone after multiple oral dose administration in horses.
Ashraf-Khorassani, M; Crisman, MV; Davis, JL; Geor, RJ; Hodgson, DR; McCutcheon, LJ; Suagee, JK; Wearn, JM, 2011
)
2.14
"Pioglitazone (PGZ) is an agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARg), itself a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, responsible for the modulation of a number of metabolic pathways, including cell differentiation, metabolism of lipids and inflammation."( Chemoprevention of hepatocellular carcinoma. Proof of concept in animal models.
Borbath, I; Stärkel, P, 2011
)
1.09
"Pioglitazone (PIO) is a new class of anti-diabetic agent with an anti-inflammatory effect. "( Effect of pretreatment with pioglitazone on reperfusion injury in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Abe, M; Kasahara, Y; Kataoka, Y; Kokubu, N; Otsuka, Y; Yagi, N, 2011
)
2.11
"Pioglitazone is suggested to be a rational add-on therapy to basal insulin in patients with high CV risk."( Double-blind, randomized, multicentre, and active comparator controlled investigation of the effect of pioglitazone, metformin, and the combination of both on cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving stable basal insulin therapy: the
Forst, T; Fuchs, W; Hanefeld, M; Kleine, I; Pfützner, A, 2011
)
1.31
"Pioglitazone is a novel class of oral antidiabetic agents currently used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus."( Protective effects of pioglitazone on renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice.
Hu, H; Huang, X; Shi, Z; Wang, G; Xi, X; Zou, C, 2012
)
1.41
"Pioglitazone is a safe and effective adjunctive short-term treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe MDD even in the absence of metabolic syndrome and diabetes."( Pioglitazone adjunctive therapy for moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder: randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
Akhondzadeh, S; Ashrafi, M; Modabbernia, A; Modabbernia, MJ; Sepanjnia, K, 2012
)
2.54
"Pioglitazone is an anti-diabetic agent that preserves pancreatic beta cell mass and improves their function. "( Pioglitazone attenuates the detrimental effects of advanced glycation end-products in the pancreatic beta cell line HIT-T15.
Durante, A; Puddu, A; Sanguineti, R; Viviani, GL, 2012
)
3.26
"Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione insulin sensitizer that has shown efficacy in Type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in humans. "( Pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone in lean and obese cats.
Clark, MH; Dirikolu, L; Ferguson, DC; Hoenig, M, 2012
)
2.15
"Pioglitazone is a prototype of thiazolidinediones, used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. "( Evaluation of vitamin B12 effects on DNA damage induced by pioglitazone.
Al-Azzam, S; Alzoubi, K; Hussain, N; Khabour, O; Mhaidat, N, 2012
)
2.06
"Pioglitazone is an insulin sensitizer used for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). "( Effect of pioglitazone on testosterone in eugonadal men with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.
Bhansali, A; Sachdeva, N; Sridhar, S; Walia, R, 2013
)
2.23
"Pioglitazone might prove to be a clinically applicable and effective pharmaceutic treatment for proliferative eye diseases."( Epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like phenotypic changes of retinal pigment epithelium induced by TGF-β are prevented by PPAR-γ agonists.
Hamuro, J; Hatanaka, H; Kay, EP; Kinoshita, S; Koizumi, N; Mizuhara, E; Okumura, N, 2012
)
1.1
"Pioglitazone is a peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor γ(PPARγ) agonist that induces differentiation in adipocytes and induces growth arrest and/or apoptosis in vitro in several cancer cell lines."( Suppressive effect of pioglitazone, a PPAR gamma ligand, on azoxymethane-induced colon aberrant crypt foci in KK-Ay mice.
Fujii, G; Komiya, M; Mutoh, M; Nakano, K; Takahashi, M; Takasu, S; Teraoka, N; Ueno, T; Wakabayashi, K; Yamamoto, M; Yanaka, A, 2012
)
1.41
"Pioglitazone is a novel oral anti-diabetic agent belonging to the thiazolidinedione class. "( Metabolic efficacy and safety of once-daily pioglitazone monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Göke, B; Scherbaum, WA, 2002
)
2.02
"Pioglitazone is a novel oral hypoglycemic agent that increases insulin responsiveness in target tissues."( Treating type 2 diabetes in renal insufficiency: the role of pioglitazone.
Budde, K; Diekmann, F; Einecke, G; Fritsche, L; Glander, P; Neumayer, HH; Schötschel, R, 2003
)
1.28
"Pioglitazone is a TZD that provides appropriate monotherapy or combination treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes."( Long-term glycaemic control with pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Campbell, IW, 2004
)
1.33
"Pioglitazone is an oral antidiabetic agent that acts primarily on adipose tissue to reduce insulin resistance."( Improvement of fat redistribution, insulin resistance and hepatic fatty infiltration in HIV-associated lipodystrophy syndrome by pioglitazone: a case report.
Bunnag, P; Prasithsirikul, W, 2004
)
1.25
"Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione that reduces insulin resistance, and glimepiride is a sulfonylurea insulin secretagogue."( Effects of pioglitazone and glimepiride on glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in Mexican patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial.
Antúnez, O; Fabián, G; Flores-Lozano, F; Garza, E; González Gálvez, G; Herz, M; Johns, D; Konkoy, C; Morales, H; Tan, M; Zúñiga Guajardo, S, 2004
)
1.43
"Pioglitazone is a member of the thiazolidinediones (TZDs), insulin-sensitizing agents used to treat type 2 diabetes. "( The effect of pioglitazone on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma target genes related to lipid storage in vivo.
Bogacka, I; Bray, GA; Smith, SR; Xie, H, 2004
)
2.13
"Pioglitazone is a promising drug for the treatment of ocular neovascularization."( Inhibition of corneal neovascularization by a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma ligand.
Benson, SC; Chittiboyina, A; Chuck, RS; Li, L; Liu, NH; Osann, KE; Patel, AJ; Pershadsingh, HA; Sarayba, MA; Sweet, PM; Tungsiripat, T, 2005
)
1.05
"Pioglitazone is a new oral antidiabetic agent, a potent inhibitor of glycation and potent antioxidant."( Effects of pioglitazone on hyperglycemia-induced alterations in antioxidative system in tissues of alloxan-treated diabetic animals.
Gumieniczek, A, 2005
)
1.44
"Pioglitazone is an insulin-sensitizing agent that has been reported to have anti-arteriosclerotic effects."( Effect of pioglitazone on arteriosclerosis in comparison with that of glibenclamide.
Anazawa, T; Kanmatsuse, K; Kushiro, T; Tani, S; Watanabe, I, 2005
)
2.17
"Pioglitazone is an insulin-sensitizer with a thiazolidinedione structure. "( Relationship between plasma hANP level and pretibial edema by pioglitazone treatment.
Kahara, T; Kaneko, S; Misaki, T; Sakurai, M; Shimizu, A; Takamura, T; Takeshita, Y, 2005
)
2.01
"Pioglitazone is an agonist of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) that raises HDL-cholesterol plasma in humans. "( Pioglitazone increases the fractional catabolic and production rates of high-density lipoproteins apo AI in the New Zealand White Rabbit.
Cardoso-Saldaña, G; Carreón-Torres, E; Fievet, C; Franco, M; Gómez, CH; Juárez-Meavepeña, M; Juárez-Oropeza, MA; Luc, G; Pérez-Méndez, O, 2005
)
3.21
"Pioglitazone is an antihyperglycaemic agent that, in the presence of insulin resistance, increases hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity, thereby inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis and increasing peripheral and splanchnic glucose uptake. "( Pioglitazone: a review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Easthope, S; Keating, GM; Plosker, GL; Robinson, DM; Waugh, J, 2006
)
3.22
"Pioglitazone is an antidiabetic drug known to decrease peripheral, hepatic and vascular insulin resistance by the stimulation of PPARgamma. "( Pioglitazone: an antidiabetic drug with the potency to reduce cardiovascular mortality.
Forst, T; Pfützner, A, 2006
)
3.22
"Pioglitazone is a new oral antidiabetic agent with potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties."( Interleukin-6 and oxidative stress in plasma of alloxan-induced diabetic rabbits after pioglitazone treatment.
Bojarska-Junak, A; Gumieniczek, A; Hopkała, H; Roliński, J, 2006
)
1.28
"Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione that has been shown to improve insulin resistance."( Pioglitazone increases gallbladder volume in insulin-resistant obese mice.
Al-Azzawi, HH; Lu, D; Mathur, A; Nakeeb, A; Pitt, HA; Swartz-Basile, DA, 2006
)
2.5
"Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione that ameliorates insulin resistance and improves glucose and lipid metabolism in type 2 diabetes mellitus."( A placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.
Balas, B; Bannayan, GA; Belfort, R; Berria, R; Brown, K; Cusi, K; Darland, C; DeFronzo, R; Dwivedi, S; Finch, J; Fincke, C; Gastaldelli, A; Hardies, J; Harrison, SA; Havranek, R; Ma, JZ; Pulcini, J; Schenker, S; Tio, F, 2006
)
1.34
"Pioglitazone is an agonist of PPARgamma, capable of reducing chronic inflammation."( Pioglitazone limits cyclosporine nephrotoxicity in rats.
Câmara, NO; Campaholle, G; Cenedeze, MA; de Paula Antunes Teixeira, V; dos Reis, MA; Pacheco-Silva, A; Pereira, MG, 2006
)
2.5
"Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione compound used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, metabolized mainly by CYP2C8 and CYP3A4. "( The pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone in Thai healthy subjects.
Chompootaweep, S; Thaworn, N; Wittayalertpanya, S, 2006
)
2.08
"Pioglitazone is a potent and selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist that improves whole-body insulin sensitivity and augments hepatic glucose uptake."( Pioglitazone plus glimepiride: a promising alternative in metabolic control.
Derosa, G, 2007
)
2.5
"Pioglitazone HCL is an insulin sensitizer in the TZD family and glimepiride is an insulin secretagogue in the SU family."( A review of pioglitazone HCL and glimepiride in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Dorkhan, M; Frid, A, 2007
)
1.44
"Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione (TZD) class of antidiabetic drug acting mainly through activation of PPARgamma which is a member of family of ligand activated nuclear hormone receptors. "( Synthesis of polymeric thiazolidinedione and fibrate conjugates.
Jeon, R; Kang, B; Kim, Y, 2008
)
1.79
"Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione drug (TZD) which potently and specifically stimulates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma) and sensitizes cells to insulin. "( In vivo effects of pioglitazone on uncoupling protein-2 and -3 mRNA levels in skeletal muscle of hyperglycemic KK mice.
Hashimoto, S; Hirayama, R; Kato, M; Kurosaki, E; Shikama, H; Shimokawa, T; Watanabe, Y, 1998
)
2.07
"Pioglitazone is an orally administered insulin sensitising thiazolidinedione agent that has been developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. "( Pioglitazone.
Dunn, CJ; Gillies, PS, 2000
)
3.19
"Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione. "( Pioglitazone.
Lawrence, JM; Reckless, JP, 2000
)
3.19
"Pioglitazone is a potent agonist for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor, (PPAR)-gamma, that is related to differentiation of adipocytes, and the relationship between TNF-alpha production and PPAR-gamma has been reported."( [Insulin resistance-reducing effect of a new thiazolidinedione derivative, pioglitazone].
Ikeda, H; Sugiyama, Y, 2001
)
1.26
"Pioglitazone is a newly developed antidiabetic agent that attenuates insulin resistance."( Pioglitazone reduces urinary podocyte excretion in type 2 diabetes patients with microalbuminuria.
Hara, M; Koide, H; Nakamura, T; Osada, S; Shimada, N; Ushiyama, C, 2001
)
2.47
"Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione that increases insulin sensitivity in target tissues. "( Pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of pioglitazone.
Hanefeld, M, 2001
)
2.02
"Pioglitazone is a potent agonist for the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor(PPAR)-gamma, that is related to differentiation of adipocytes, and the relationship between TNF-alpha production and PPAR-gamma has been reported."( [Pharmacological effects of a thiazolidinedione derivative, pioglitazone].
Ikeda, H; Sugiyama, Y, 2001
)
1.27
"Pioglitazone is a member of a recently developed class of glucose-lowering agents, the thiazolidinediones, used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. "( A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of pioglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Chilcott, J; Jones, ML; Tappenden, P; Wight, JP, 2001
)
2
"Pioglitazone is an oral hypoglycemic agent in the thiazolidinedione class. "( Mixed hepatocellular-cholestatic liver injury after pioglitazone therapy.
Kram, MT; Lefkowitch, JH; May, LD; Rubin, DE, 2002
)
2.01
"Pioglitazone is a TZD that reduces plasma glucose levels by increasing peripheral glucose utilisation and decreasing hepatic glucose production."( New solutions for type 2 diabetes mellitus: the role of pioglitazone.
Grossman, LD, 2002
)
1.28

Effects

Pioglitazone (PG) has a neuroprotective impact and can decrease inflammation after TBI. It activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARP) The CGD is involved in changes of synthesis, transformation, absorption, and transportation of cholesterol.

Pioglitazone (PG) has a neuroprotective impact and can decrease inflammation after TBI. It activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR) Piog litazone has been reported as a possible therapeutic option.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Pioglitazone (PG), which has a neuroprotective impact and can decrease inflammation after TBI, activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR"( Neuroprotective and Anti-inflammatory Effects of Pioglitazone on Traumatic Brain Injury.
Abdullaev, SY; Bazmandegan, G; Bokov, DO; Gholamrezapour, M; Heidari, M; Opulencia, MJC; Taheri, N; Zamanian, MY, 2022
)
1.7
"Pioglitazone has a noticeable benefit towards the CGD, which is involved in changes of synthesis, transformation, absorption, and transportation of cholesterol."( Pioglitazone prevents cholesterol gallstone formation through the regulation of cholesterol homeostasis in guinea pigs with a lithogenic diet.
Fu, Z; Han, T; Hong, H; Hu, T; Lv, Y; Wang, S, 2019
)
3.4
"Pioglitazone has a null association with oral cancer after adjustment for potential confounders."( Pioglitazone and oral cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Tseng, CH, 2014
)
3.29
"Pioglitazone has a promoting effect on ischemic limb angiogenesis in diabetic rats."( Effect of pioglitazone on expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α and vascular endothelial growth factor in ischemic hindlimb of diabetic rats.
Bai, SJ; Gao, X; Ye, XM; Zhang, J; Zhang, M, 2014
)
1.53
"Pioglitazone has a preventive effect on cardiovascular disease, but its ability to stabilize coronary plaque is unknown."( Pioglitazone reduces the necrotic-core component in coronary plaque in association with enhanced plasma adiponectin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Hirata, K; Kato, H; Kawamori, H; Miyoshi, N; Ogasawara, D; Otake, H; Sawada, T; Shinke, T; Shite, J; Tanino, Y; Watanabe, S, 2009
)
3.24
"Pioglitazone has a potential beneficial antipsoriatic effect and may provide a convenient, efficacious, and relatively safe option to combine with acitretin, although further studies are needed. "( Efficacy and safety of combination Acitretin and Pioglitazone therapy in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Dogra, S; Kaur, I; Malhotra, S; Mittal, R; Pandhi, P, 2009
)
2.05
"Pioglitazone has an important role in the treatment of patients with Type 2 diabetes. "( Which is the eligible patient to be treated with pioglitazone? The expert view.
Avogaro, A; Betteridge, J; Bonadonna, R; Campbell, IW; Crepaldi, G; Farinaro, E; Federici, M; Schernthaner, GH; Staels, B, 2011
)
2.07
"Pioglitazone has a good safety profile in diabetic patients with impaired renal function."( Treating type 2 diabetes in renal insufficiency: the role of pioglitazone.
Budde, K; Diekmann, F; Einecke, G; Fritsche, L; Glander, P; Neumayer, HH; Schötschel, R, 2003
)
1.28
"As pioglitazone has a low toxicity profile, we believe it would be interesting to evaluate its effect in chemoprevention of HCC in humans in a clinical setting."( The PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone inhibits early neoplastic occurrence in the rat liver.
Borbath, I; Horsmans, Y; Leclercq, I; Moulin, P; Sempoux, C, 2007
)
1.17
"Pioglitazone (PG), which has a neuroprotective impact and can decrease inflammation after TBI, activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR"( Neuroprotective and Anti-inflammatory Effects of Pioglitazone on Traumatic Brain Injury.
Abdullaev, SY; Bazmandegan, G; Bokov, DO; Gholamrezapour, M; Heidari, M; Opulencia, MJC; Taheri, N; Zamanian, MY, 2022
)
1.7
"Pioglitazone has been reported as a possible therapeutic option."( Efficacy and safety of oral pioglitazone in the management of lichen planopilaris in comparison with clobetasol: A randomized clinical trial.
Azar, PM; Balighi, K; Daneshpazhooh, M; Dasdar, S; Ghiasi, M; Kianfar, N; Lajevardi, V; Peymanfar, AA, 2022
)
1.74
"Pioglitazone has positive effects not only on cardiac risk factors and surrogate measures of cardiovascular disease, it also lowers the incidence of cardiac events in patients with diabetes."( In praise of pioglitazone: An economically efficacious therapy for type 2 diabetes and other manifestations of the metabolic syndrome.
Bell, DSH; Jerkins, T, 2023
)
2
"Pioglitazone has a noticeable benefit towards the CGD, which is involved in changes of synthesis, transformation, absorption, and transportation of cholesterol."( Pioglitazone prevents cholesterol gallstone formation through the regulation of cholesterol homeostasis in guinea pigs with a lithogenic diet.
Fu, Z; Han, T; Hong, H; Hu, T; Lv, Y; Wang, S, 2019
)
3.4
"Pioglitazone has been shown to consistently induce resolution of NASH in both patients with or without diabetes in a total of 498 participants in five randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but with modest effects on liver fibrosis."( A diabetologist's perspective of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): Knowledge gaps and future directions.
Cusi, K, 2020
)
1.28
"Pioglitazone has more potential for benefit than harm, and can be continued in people with T2DM and mild/moderate COVID-19, unless there are specific contraindications for its use. "( Use of pioglitazone in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Boon or bane?
Jagat J, M; Kalyan K, G; Subir, R,
)
2.03
"Pioglitazone has shown promise in secondary stroke prevention for insulin-resistant patients; however, its use is not yet widespread."( Diabetes, stroke, and neuroresilience: looking beyond hyperglycemia.
Krinock, MJ; Singhal, NS, 2021
)
1.34
"Pioglitazone has important role in the inflammatory response, which suggests that it might have the associated anti-depressant effects being manifested by its anti-depressant profile which needs further exploration."( Dose related acute behavioral and neurochemical profile of pioglitazone.
Choudhry, AM; Ganau, M; Haleem, DJ; Ikram, H; Sheikh, SA, 2021
)
1.59
"Pioglitazone has antioxidant properties independent of its hypoglycemic effects."( The Protective Effects of Pioglitazone Against Cognitive Impairment Caused by L-methionine Administration in a Rat Model.
Al-Azzam, SI; Alfaqih, M; Alrabadi, N; Alzoubi, KH; Khabour, OF; Mhaidat, NM; Tashtoush, M, 2022
)
1.74
"Pioglitazone (PIO) has been found to exert an anti-inflammatory effect in patients with diabetes mellitus, but it is still unclear whether PIO exhibits a similar effect in DN."( Pioglitazone ameliorates glomerular NLRP3 inflammasome activation in apolipoprotein E knockout mice with diabetes mellitus.
Wang, L; Wang, Y; Wei, W; Xia, Z; Yang, M; Yu, B; Yuan, X; Zhang, F, 2017
)
2.62
"Pioglitazone use has increased since 2008 in response to safety issues surrounding rosiglitazone."( Impact of clinical evidence communications and drug regulation changes concerning rosiglitazone on prescribing patterns of antidiabetic therapies.
Kang, DR; Kim, DJ; Lee, KJ; Lee, S; Noh, Y; Shin, S, 2017
)
1.18
"Pioglitazone has superior antiatherosclerotic effects compared with other classes of antidiabetic agents, and there is substantial evidence that pioglitazone improves cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. "( Effect of pioglitazone on cardiometabolic profiles and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing percutaneous coronary artery intervention: a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.
Hikichi, Y; Horiuchi, K; Inoue, T; Iwasaki, Y; Kawaguchi, A; Kawasaki, T; Komukai, S; Nakao, K; Nakashima, H; Node, K; Shibata, Y; Shimomura, M; Tago, M; Tamashiro, M; Tanaka, A; Toyoda, S; Ueno, T; Yokoi, H, 2018
)
2.33
"Pioglitazone has been widely used as an insulin-sensitizing agent for improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. "( Pioglitazone Induces Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis and Inhibits Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy Via VEGFR-2 Signaling Pathway.
Chen, L; Jin, W; Liang, M; Luo, S; Wu, Y; Xu, S; Zhong, W, 2018
)
3.37
"Pioglitazone has potentially restored cellular antioxidants and reduced levels of IL-6 and TNF-α by declining expression of membrane RAGE and NF-κB."( Pioglitazone inhibits advanced glycation induced protein modifications and down-regulates expression of RAGE and NF-κB in renal cells.
Adeshara, KA; Agrawal, SB; Gaikwad, SM; Tupe, RS, 2018
)
2.64
"Pioglitazone has proved effective in raising HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) and lowering small dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL), but no clinical studies have examined its effect on lipoprotein oxidation in patients with DM2."( Long-term effect of pioglitazone vs glimepiride on lipoprotein oxidation in patients with type 2 diabetes: a prospective randomized study.
Burlina, S; Chilelli, NC; Cosma, C; Lapolla, A; Marin, R; Ragazzi, E; Roverso, M; Sartore, G; Seraglia, R; Vaccaro, O, 2019
)
1.56
"Pioglitazone has been used for the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) related to diabetes. "( Adiponectin is required for pioglitazone-induced improvements in hepatic steatosis in mice fed a high-fat diet.
de Mendonça, M; de Sousa, É; Dos Santos, BAC; Rodrigues, AC, 2019
)
2.25
"Pioglitazone has been demonstrated to exert anti-fibrotic and renoprotective effects. "( Pioglitazone attenuates kidney fibrosis via miR-21-5p modulation.
Chen, Y; Qu, W; Song, X; Sun, D; Sun, L; Xu, T; Yao, L; Yuan, Q, 2019
)
3.4
"Pioglitazone has been shown to significantly reduce cardiovascular adverse outcomes, while preliminary data on IBTs are very encouraging as well."( Non-glycemic effects of pioglitazone and incretin-based therapies.
Avogaro, A; Montalto, G; Rizvi, AA; Rizzo, M, 2013
)
1.42
"Pioglitazone has been reported to variably influence visceral fat volume; however, its effect on metabolic activity of the visceral fat remains uncharacterized."( Effects of pioglitazone on visceral fat metabolic activity in impaired glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Abe, T; Fukumoto, Y; Honda, A; Ikeda, H; Imaizumi, T; Ishibashi, M; Kaida, H; Kodama, N; Mizoguchi, M; Narula, J; Nitta, Y; Tahara, A; Tahara, N; Yamagishi, S, 2013
)
1.5
"Pioglitazone has shown an inhibitory effect on the growth of cell lines derived from human salivary gland and human oral squamous cell carcinoma. "( Pioglitazone and oral cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Tseng, CH, 2014
)
3.29
"Pioglitazone has a null association with oral cancer after adjustment for potential confounders."( Pioglitazone and oral cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Tseng, CH, 2014
)
3.29
"Pioglitazone has a promoting effect on ischemic limb angiogenesis in diabetic rats."( Effect of pioglitazone on expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α and vascular endothelial growth factor in ischemic hindlimb of diabetic rats.
Bai, SJ; Gao, X; Ye, XM; Zhang, J; Zhang, M, 2014
)
1.53
"Pioglitazone has anti-inflammatory effects on acute gouty arthritis by inhibiting the expression of TNF-α and IFN-γ."( PPAR-γ agonist pioglitazone affects rat gouty arthritis by regulating cytokines.
Jiang, DM; Wang, RC, 2014
)
1.48
"Pioglitazone has been shown to increase levels of adiponectin in diabetic patients."( Pioglitazone increases adiponectin levels in nondiabetic patients with coronary artery disease.
Coppola, JT; Mailloux, LM; Mindrescu, C; Patel, SR; Staniloae, CS, 2008
)
2.51
"Pioglitazone has favorable effects on important components of metabolic syndrome including blood pressure."( [Pioglitazone effects on blood pressure in patients with metabolic syndrome].
Kushiro, T; Takahashi, A, 2008
)
1.98
"Pioglitazone has advantage over rosiglitazone in lowering lipid and proinflammatory cytokines."( Effect of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone on mediators of endothelial dysfunction, markers of angiogenesis and inflammatory cytokines in type-2 diabetes.
Kumar, H; Mishra, M; Tripathi, K; Vijay, SK, 2009
)
1.48
"Pioglitazone has been reported to improve common cardiovascular risk factors in addition to glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). "( [Six-month effectiveness and tolerability of pioglitazone in combination with sulfonylureas or metformin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus].
Mesa, J; Polavieja, P; Reviriego, J; Rodríguez, A, 2008
)
2.05
"Pioglitazone has a preventive effect on cardiovascular disease, but its ability to stabilize coronary plaque is unknown."( Pioglitazone reduces the necrotic-core component in coronary plaque in association with enhanced plasma adiponectin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Hirata, K; Kato, H; Kawamori, H; Miyoshi, N; Ogasawara, D; Otake, H; Sawada, T; Shinke, T; Shite, J; Tanino, Y; Watanabe, S, 2009
)
3.24
"Pioglitazone has been associated with improved cardiac outcome but also with an elevated risk of heart failure."( Pioglitazone improves cardiac function and alters myocardial substrate metabolism without affecting cardiac triglyceride accumulation and high-energy phosphate metabolism in patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Bax, JJ; de Jong, HW; de Roos, A; Diamant, M; Heine, RJ; Kamp, O; Lamb, HJ; Lammertsma, AA; Lubberink, M; Paulus, WJ; Rijzewijk, LJ; Romijn, JA; Smit, JW; van der Meer, RW, 2009
)
2.52
"Pioglitazone has a potential beneficial antipsoriatic effect and may provide a convenient, efficacious, and relatively safe option to combine with acitretin, although further studies are needed. "( Efficacy and safety of combination Acitretin and Pioglitazone therapy in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Dogra, S; Kaur, I; Malhotra, S; Mittal, R; Pandhi, P, 2009
)
2.05
"Pioglitazone has been shown to reduce fasting triglyceride levels. "( Decreased whole body lipolysis as a mechanism of the lipid-lowering effect of pioglitazone in type 2 diabetic patients.
Buzzigoli, E; Casolaro, A; Ciociaro, D; Ferrannini, E; Frascerra, S; Gastaldelli, A; Nannipieri, M, 2009
)
2.02
"Pioglitazone has diverse multiple effects on metabolic and inflammatory processes that have the potential to influence cardiovascular disease pathophysiology at various points in the disease process, including atherogenesis, plaque inflammation, plaque rupture, haemostatic disturbances and microangiopathy."( Pioglitazone and mechanisms of CV protection.
Erdmann, E; Wilcox, R, 2010
)
3.25
"Pioglitazone has demonstrated a favorable CV profile relative to other oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in outcome and observational studies."( Effects of pioglitazone and metformin fixed-dose combination therapy on cardiovascular risk markers of inflammation and lipid profile compared with pioglitazone and metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Arora, V; Jacks, R; Perez, A; Spanheimer, R, 2010
)
1.47
"Pioglitazone has beneficial effects on central obesity of the patients with polycystic ovary syndrome but other clinical consequences of the syndrome may not improve with the drug."( Pioglitazone reduces central obesity in polycystic ovary syndrome women.
Asadipooya, K; Kalantar-Hormozi, M; Nabipour, I, 2012
)
3.26
"Pioglitazone has an important role in the treatment of patients with Type 2 diabetes. "( Which is the eligible patient to be treated with pioglitazone? The expert view.
Avogaro, A; Betteridge, J; Bonadonna, R; Campbell, IW; Crepaldi, G; Farinaro, E; Federici, M; Schernthaner, GH; Staels, B, 2011
)
2.07
"Pioglitazone has been demonstrated to have beneficial effects on cardiovascular outcomes. "( Pioglitazone attenuates cardiac fibrosis and hypertrophy in a rat model of diabetic nephropathy.
Asker, ME; Elrashidy, RA; Mohamed, HE, 2012
)
3.26
"Pioglitazone has been shown to reduce the occurrence of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). "( Effect of pioglitazone on arterial baroreflex sensitivity and sympathetic nerve activity in patients with acute myocardial infarction and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Iwasaka, T; Miyasaka, Y; Murakawa, K; Sugiura, T; Tsujimoto, S; Yokoe, H; Yoshida, S; Yuasa, F; Yuyama, R, 2012
)
2.22
"Pioglitazone has no beneficial effects on the survival of ALS patients as add-on therapy to riluzole."( A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone in combination with riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Benecke, R; Bogdahn, U; Dengler, R; Dreyhaupt, J; Dupuis, L; Fischer, W; Grehl, T; Grosskreutz, J; Heneka, MT; Hermann, A; Kassubek, J; Lindauer, E; Ludolph, AC; Meyer, T; Otto, M; Schrank, B; Steiner, F; Wessig, C; Winkler, AS; Zierz, S, 2012
)
2.07
"Pioglitazone has been shown to be effective in the treatment of glucose and lipid abnormalities in diabetes and decreasing longer-term conversion of impaired glucose tolerance to frank diabetes."( Effects of pioglitazone on metabolic abnormalities, psychopathology, and cognitive function in schizophrenic patients treated with antipsychotic medication: a randomized double-blind study.
Bark, N; Davis, JM; Dwivedi, S; Hu, Q; Jin, H; Li, C; Lohr, J; Mortiere, C; Shekhar, A; Smith, RC, 2013
)
1.5
"Pioglitazone has been shown to be effective and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes, as it reduces insulin resistance and improves glycaemic control and abnormal lipid profiles."( Metabolic efficacy and safety of once-daily pioglitazone monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Göke, B; Scherbaum, WA, 2002
)
1.3
"Pioglitazone has a good safety profile in diabetic patients with impaired renal function."( Treating type 2 diabetes in renal insufficiency: the role of pioglitazone.
Budde, K; Diekmann, F; Einecke, G; Fritsche, L; Glander, P; Neumayer, HH; Schötschel, R, 2003
)
1.28
"Pioglitazone has been approved in Europe for oral combination therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. "( Cost effectiveness of combination therapy with pioglitazone for type 2 diabetes mellitus from a german statutory healthcare perspective.
Lübben, G; Neeser, K; Schramm, W; Siebert, U, 2004
)
2.02
"Pioglitazone (PIO) has preventive effects on impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and urinary albumin excretion in diabetes. "( Effect of pioglitazone on the early stage of type 2 diabetic nephropathy in KK/Ta mice.
Fan, Q; Gohda, T; Makita, Y; Shike, T; Tanimoto, M; Tomino, Y, 2004
)
2.17
"Pioglitazone (PIO) has been shown to decrease insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes, resulting in lowered blood glucose concentrations, lowered plasma insulin levels and lowered haemoglobin A1C (A1C) values. "( Pioglitazone and reductions in post-challenge glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Karunaratne, M; Khan, M; Murray, FT; Perez, A, 2006
)
3.22
"Pioglitazone has furthermore demonstrated numerous antiatherogenic effects in clinical and preclinical investigations."( Organ protection in the secondary prevention of type 2 diabetes.
Schernthaner, G, 2006
)
1.06
"Pioglitazone has vasorelaxant property in the grafts."( Alteration of vascular reactivity in diabetic human mammary artery and the effects of thiazolidinediones.
Ari, N; Aslamaci, S; Irat, AM; Karasu, C, 2006
)
1.06
"As pioglitazone has a low toxicity profile, we believe it would be interesting to evaluate its effect in chemoprevention of HCC in humans in a clinical setting."( The PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone inhibits early neoplastic occurrence in the rat liver.
Borbath, I; Horsmans, Y; Leclercq, I; Moulin, P; Sempoux, C, 2007
)
1.17
"Pioglitazone has been reported to have antiatherogenic effects."( The effects of pioglitazone on cerebrovascular resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Ahn, CW; Cha, BS; Cho, MH; Kim, CS; Kim, HJ; Kim, KR; Lee, HC; Lee, KY; Lim, SK; Nam, JS; Park, JS, 2007
)
1.41
"Pioglitazone has antiatherogenic property through the inhibition of inflammation."( Pioglitazone attenuates neointimal thickening via suppression of the early inflammatory response in a porcine coronary after stenting.
Daida, H; Ikeda, E; Kajimoto, K; Kasai, T; Kubota, N; Miyauchi, K; Sumiyoshi, K; Yokoyama, T, 2008
)
2.51
"Pioglitazone has also been shown to reduce matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity."( PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone reduces [corrected] neuronal cell damage after transient global cerebral ischemia through matrix metalloproteinase inhibition.
Jang, YH; Lee, H; Lee, KJ; Lee, SR; Yoo, HS, 2008
)
1.4
"Pioglitazone has been shown to exert multiple antiatherosclerotic actions independent from its glycemic effects. "( Impact of pioglitazone on coronary endothelial function in non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.
Höher, M; Hombach, V; Kestler, HA; Koenig, W; Marx, N; Nusser, T; Wöhrle, J, 2008
)
2.19
"Pioglitazone, therefore, has no direct effect on insulin-stimulated PI 3-kinase activity, but interferes with a cyclic AMP-dependent mechanism that normally antagonizes this action of insulin."( Pioglitazone promotes insulin-induced activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase in 3T3-L1 adipocytes by inhibiting a negative control mechanism.
Bleasdale, JE; Jacob, CS; Sizer, KM; Smith, CL; Swanson, ML, 1994
)
2.45
"Pioglitazone, therefore, has no direct effect on insulin-stimulated PI 3-kinase activity, but interferes with a cyclic AMP-dependent mechanism that normally antagonizes this action of insulin."( Pioglitazone promotes insulin-induced activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase in 3T3-L1 adipocytes by inhibiting a negative control mechanism.
Bleasdale, JE; Jacob, CS; Sizer, KM; Smith, CL; Swanson, ML, 1994
)
2.45
"Pioglitazone has also been associated with improvements in serum lipid profiles in randomised placebo-controlled clinical studies."( Pioglitazone.
Dunn, CJ; Gillies, PS, 2000
)
2.47
"Pioglitazone has been shown to reduce blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. "( A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of pioglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Chilcott, J; Jones, ML; Tappenden, P; Wight, JP, 2001
)
2

Actions

Pioglitazone could inhibit activation of the glia cells, prevent cell apoptosis, and protect the retina from subsequent cellular damage caused by the retinal I/R. Piog litazone can suppress the luminal occlusions of the tracheal graft in an allograft through enhanced Treg infiltration, and may provide new therapies to prevent BO.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Pioglitazone plays protective roles similar to luteolin."( Luteolin alleviates inflammation and autophagy of hippocampus induced by cerebral ischemia/reperfusion by activating PPAR gamma in rats.
Fan, R; Guo, L; Li, D; Li, L; Liang, H; Ma, L; Pan, G; Qiu, J, 2022
)
1.44
"The pioglitazone group had a lower incidence of PD, with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-0.78], and this benefit was dose-dependent."( Pioglitazone and statins lower incidence of Parkinson disease in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Chang, YH; Lin, KD; Wu, WJ; Yen, SJ, 2021
)
2.54
"Pioglitazone could enhance alternative activation of monocyte-derived macrophages and consequently immunomodulation in these patients."( Immunomodulation in systemic lupus erythematosus: induction of M2 population in monocyte-derived macrophages by pioglitazone.
Memarian, A; Mohammadi, S; Saghaeian-Jazi, M; Sedighi, S, 2017
)
1.39
"Pioglitazone does not lower the risk for all-cause mortality, and increases the risk for the development of HF."( Pioglitazone and the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.
de Jong, M; van der Graaf, Y; van der Worp, HB; Visseren, FLJ; Westerink, J, 2017
)
2.62
"Pioglitazone can suppress the luminal occlusions of the tracheal graft in an allograft through enhanced Treg infiltration, and may provide new therapies to prevent BO."( The prevention of tracheal graft occlusion using pioglitazone: A mouse tracheal transplant model study.
Ohtsuka, T; Shigenobu, T; Shimoda, M, 2019
)
1.49
"Pioglitazone could inhibit activation of the glia cells, prevent cell apoptosis, and protect the retina from subsequent cellular damage caused by the retinal I/R. "( Protective effect of pioglitazone on retinal ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats.
Xiao, YQ; Ye, W; Zhang, XY; Zhang, Y, 2013
)
2.15
"Pioglitazone can inhibit the myocardial apoptosis induced by ischemia/reperfusion. "( [Effects of pioglitazone on TGFbeta1 expression in ischemia/reperfusion injury myocardium of rats].
Li, Y; Li, ZB; Wang, H; Wang, L; Ye, P, 2013
)
2.21
"Pioglitazone can inhibit oxidative stress through suppressing NADPH oxidase expression and p38MAPK phosphorylation."( Pioglitazone inhibits the expression of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in rat mesangial cells.
Hu, YY; Sun, WJ; Wang, S; Ye, SD, 2013
)
3.28
"Pioglitazone can inhibit myocardial apoptosis induced by I/R injury and up-regulate myocardial PGC-lα expression, and these effects are mediated by PPARγ."( [Effects of pioglitazone on myocardial peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma co-activator lα expression in rats with myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury].
Shen, L; Wang, H; Ye, P, 2014
)
2.22
"Pioglitazone failed to increase adiponectin secretion from either ND or T2D VAT and increased cellular content only in ND VAT."( Adiponectin secretion and response to pioglitazone is depot dependent in cultured human adipose tissue.
Ciaraldi, TP; Henry, RR; Oh, DK; Phillips, SA; Savu, MK, 2008
)
1.34
"Pioglitazone was found to increase adiponectin secretion and PI3K activity in a dose-dependent manner from 3T3-L1 and human adipocytes. "( Pioglitazone acutely stimulates adiponectin secretion from mouse and human adipocytes via activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase.
Draznin, B; Erickson, C; Leitner, JW; Pereira, RI, 2008
)
3.23
"Pioglitazone does not increase the risk for MI and may decrease the risk for stroke and revascularization."( Pioglitazone and the risk of myocardial infarction and other major adverse cardiac events: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.
Adigopula, S; Balamuthusamy, S; Benatar, D; Khosla, S; Khraisat, A; Molnar, J; Nagajothi, N; Raghunathan, K; Singh, S; Velazquez-Cecena, JL,
)
2.3
"Pioglitazone may cause fluid retention, a well-known side effect of thiazolidinediones, and may exacerbate heart failure. "( Comparison of pioglitazone vs glyburide in early heart failure: insights from a randomized controlled study of patients with type 2 diabetes and mild cardiac disease.
Bhattacharya, M; Elkayam, U; Giles, TD; Miller, AB; Perez, A,
)
1.93
"Pioglitazone can suppress the oxidative stress and damage and can stimulate antioxidant capacity in cardiac allografts after transplantation. "( Antioxidant properties of pioglitazone limit nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate hydrogen oxidase and augment superoxide dismutase activity in cardiac allotransplantation.
Hasegawa, T; Okada, K; Okita, Y; Pinsky, DJ, 2011
)
2.11
"Pioglitazone led to an increase in adiponectin compared with glimepiride. "( Pioglitazone-mediated changes in lipoprotein particle composition are predicted by changes in adiponectin level in type 2 diabetes.
D'Agostino, R; Davidson, MH; Haffner, S; Mazzone, T; Perez, A; Sam, S, 2012
)
3.26
"Pioglitazone did not cause increased expression of PKC in the cardiomyocytes."( [Effect of pioglitazone on hypoxia/reoxygenation injury and protein kinase C expression in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes].
Luo, LM; Wang, H; Ye, P; Zhang, JY; Zhu, QW, 2011
)
1.48
"Pioglitazone did not increase the risk of bladder cancer significantly compared with the other antidiabetic drugs treatment group, (adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 1.16, 95% CI 0.83, 1.62)."( Pioglitazone and bladder cancer: a propensity score matched cohort study.
MacDonald, TM; Mackenzie, IS; Wei, L, 2013
)
2.55
"Pioglitazone may allow the donor indications for liver transplantation to be expanded to include severe macrovesicular fatty livers."( Decreased Mrp2 transport in severe macrovesicular fatty liver grafts.
Aihara, A; Arii, S; Ban, D; Irie, T; Kudo, A; Nakamura, N; Ochiai, T; Tanaka, S, 2012
)
1.1
"Pioglitazone did not increase weight or produce any other significant side-effects."( Effects of pioglitazone on metabolic abnormalities, psychopathology, and cognitive function in schizophrenic patients treated with antipsychotic medication: a randomized double-blind study.
Bark, N; Davis, JM; Dwivedi, S; Hu, Q; Jin, H; Li, C; Lohr, J; Mortiere, C; Shekhar, A; Smith, RC, 2013
)
1.5
"Pioglitazone prevented increase in plasma aspartate transaminase, alanine aminotransferase, and TNF-alpha levels but had no effect on plasma and hepatic levels of lipid peroxide. "( Pioglitazone prevents acute liver injury induced by ethanol and lipopolysaccharide through the suppression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha.
Hashimoto, K; Hokkyo, K; Nakajima, H; Ohata, M; Sakamoto, K; Suzuki, H; Toda, G; Yamada, H; Yamauchi, M, 2004
)
3.21
"Pioglitazone does not increase the plasma concentrations of repaglinide, indicating that the inhibitory effect of pioglitazone on CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 is very weak in vivo, probably due to its extensive plasma protein binding. "( Pioglitazone, an in vitro inhibitor of CYP2C8 and CYP3A4, does not increase the plasma concentrations of the CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 substrate repaglinide.
Backman, JT; Jaakkola, T; Kajosaari, LI; Neuvonen, PJ, 2006
)
3.22
"Pioglitazone did inhibit the increase in expressions vs I/R (P < 0.05)."( Antiapoptosis and mitochondrial effect of pioglitazone preconditioning in the ischemic/reperfused heart of rat.
Feng, YB; Lang, MJ; Li, J; Mao, XB; Tian, L, 2008
)
1.33

Treatment

Pioglitazone and metformin treatment were associated with significant reductions in hyperglycemia, HOMA-IR and HbA1c levels. Piog litazone treatment resulted in better glycemic control, improved lipid levels, an increase in insulin sensitivity and adiponectin levels, and a decrease in inflammatory markers.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly increased intracellular lipid accumulation in adipocytes compared to control."( A Novel Partial PPARγ Agonist Has Weaker Lipogenic Effect in Adipocytes and Stimulates GLUT4 Translocation in Skeletal Muscle Cells via AMPK-Dependent Signaling.
Guru, B; Kumar, PBR; Mandal, SP; Manjula, SN; Sharma, A; Tamrakar, AK, 2022
)
1.44
"Pioglitazone treatment increased oxygen saturation and pTyr14cav-1 vs."( Pioglitazone restores phosphorylation of downregulated caveolin-1 in right ventricle of monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension.
Balis, P; Doka, G; Klimas, J; Kmecova, Z; Krenek, P; Malikova, E; Pivackova, LB; Trubacova, S; Velasova, E, 2022
)
2.89
"Pioglitazone treatment was associated with increased expression of chemokine (Cxcl1, Cxcl2, and Ccl20) and cytokine genes (Tnfa, Il6, and Cfs3) in bronchial brushes obtained 6 h after infection."( The PPAR-γ agonist pioglitazone exerts proinflammatory effects in bronchial epithelial cells during acute Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia.
de Vos, AF; Ferreira, BL; Otto, NA; Ramirez-Moral, I; Salomão, R; van der Poll, T, 2022
)
1.77
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly reduced squamous lesions and the presence of airway basal cells, along with increasing normal epithelial cells in the airways of NTCU-exposed mice."( PPARgamma agonism inhibits progression of premalignant lesions in a murine lung squamous cell carcinoma model.
Alavi, K; Dwyer-Nield, LD; Ghosh, M; Hudish, LI; Hudish, TM; Keith, RL; McArthur, DG; Merrick, DT; Mirita, C; Smith, AJ; Sompel, K; Tennis, MA, 2022
)
1.44
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly improved left ventricular diastolic function in type 2 diabetic patients with a mean age of < 55 years, but did not improve left ventricular diastolic function in patients with a mean age of ≥ 55 years."( Change in left ventricular diastolic function after pioglitazone treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bi, Y; Li, Y; Meng, X; Song, H; Yu, R, 2023
)
2.6
"Pioglitazone treatment led to a significant 3% body mass increase. "( Effect of pioglitazone treatment on brown adipose tissue volume and activity and hypothalamic gliosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a proof-of-concept study.
Cendes, F; Cintra, RM; de-Lima-Júnior, JC; Folli, F; Monfort-Pires, M; Rachid, B; Ramos, CD; Rodovalho, S; Van de Sande-Lee, S; Velloso, LA, 2019
)
2.36
"Pioglitazone treated TBI rats performed significantly better in the RAM test than untreated TBI rats, and similarly to control animals."( Pioglitazone improves working memory performance when administered in chronic TBI.
Anwar, FN; Correll, EA; Lowery, AC; McCullumsmith, RE; McGuire, JL; Ngwenya, LB; Rhame, K, 2019
)
2.68
"Pioglitazone treatment of obese mice increased insulin-mediated glucose transport as a result of increased fatty acid oxidation and mitochondrial activity."( MicroRNA miR-222 mediates pioglitazone beneficial effects on skeletal muscle of diet-induced obese mice.
Araújo Dos Santos, B; Araújo, HN; da Paixão, AO; de Mendonça, M; de Sousa, É; Imamura de Lima, T; Murata, GM; Passos Simões Fróes Guimarães, DS; Rodrigues, AC; Roveratti Spagnol, A; Silveira, LR, 2020
)
1.58
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly increased cell viability, promoted SIRT1-p53 interaction, upregulated Bcl-2 expression, activated SIRT1 and elevated mitochondrial ATP synthesis after cisplatin treatment."( Pioglitazone alleviates cisplatin nephrotoxicity by suppressing mitochondria-mediated apoptosis via SIRT1/p53 signalling.
Cheng-Jing, Y; Li, GS; Wang, J; Wang, XP; Xiang-Heng, L; Yu, XJ; Zhang, J; Zou, Y, 2020
)
2.72
"Pioglitazone treatment attenuated obesity-induced elastin fiber fragmentation and elastolytic activity and ameliorated the obesity-induced upregulation of cathepsin S and metalloproteinase 12, predominantly in the PVAT."( PPARγ activation improves the microenvironment of perivascular adipose tissue and attenuates aortic stiffening in obesity.
Chen, JY; Chiou, YW; Jheng, HF; Kao, LZ; Leu, SY; Li, CY; Lien, IC; Tai, HC; Tang, MJ; Tsai, PJ; Tsai, YS; Weng, WT; Wu, YP; Yang, CC, 2021
)
1.34
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly improved LPS-induced neurobehavioral and physiological disturbances including the loss of body weight, hypothermia, righting reflex, wire-hanging maneuver, negative geotaxis, and hind-limb suspension in neonatal rats."( Pioglitazone Ameliorates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Behavioral Impairment, Brain Inflammation, White Matter Injury and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Neonatal Rats.
Fan, LW; Kaizaki, A; Lee, JW; Ojeda, NB; Tien, LT; Tucci, MA; Wang, KC; Wei, HC; Yeh, JH, 2021
)
2.79
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly increased urinary calcium, serum TRAP, mRNA expression of RANKL, PPAR-γ as well as significantly decreased Runx2, OPG, osteocalcin and AMPK levels in diabetic rats."( Pioglitazone-induced bone loss in diabetic rats and its amelioration by berberine: A portrait of molecular crosstalk.
Adil, M; Kandhare, AD; Mansoori, MN; Sharma, M; Singh, D, 2017
)
2.62
"Upon pioglitazone treatment, the PDGF and TIMP-2 expression levels were decreased compared with high-fat diet-fed mice devoid of drug stimulation. "( Pioglitazone suppresses inflammation and fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by down-regulating PDGF and TIMP-2: Evidence from in vitro study.
Deng, W; Meng, Z; Sun, A; Yang, Z, 2017
)
2.41
"Pioglitazone treatment seems to have more beneficial effects than rosiglitazone and no significantly increased cardiovascular risk was detected for both agents."( Different Effects of Thiazolidinediones on In-Stent Restenosis and Target Lesion Revascularization after PCI: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Chen, S; Dai, J; Hua, J; Mao, W; Qiu, Y; Xu, X; Zhou, X; Zhu, M, 2017
)
1.18
"Pioglitazone treatment reduced HbA1c levels to a similar degree as conventional treatment (pioglitazone group 6.5 to 6.0%, P < 0.01; control group 6.5 to 5.9%, P < 0.001), without body weight gain."( Effect of pioglitazone on cardiometabolic profiles and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing percutaneous coronary artery intervention: a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.
Hikichi, Y; Horiuchi, K; Inoue, T; Iwasaki, Y; Kawaguchi, A; Kawasaki, T; Komukai, S; Nakao, K; Nakashima, H; Node, K; Shibata, Y; Shimomura, M; Tago, M; Tamashiro, M; Tanaka, A; Toyoda, S; Ueno, T; Yokoi, H, 2018
)
1.6
"Pioglitazone treatment did not influence body weight or ovarian weight in either group."( Pioglitazone is effective for multiple phenotyepes of the Zucker fa/fa rat with polycystc ovary morphology and insulin resistance.
Baba, T; Endo, T; Honnma, H; Ikeda, K; Kiya, T; Kuno, Y; Morishita, M; Saito, T, 2018
)
2.64
"Pioglitazone treatment in diabetic patients does not increase the incidence of bone fractures. "( Pioglitazone Therapy and Fractures: Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis.
Filipova, E; Kalinov, K; Pavlova, V; Uzunova, K; Vekov, T, 2018
)
3.37
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly altered levels of hepatic metabolites, including free fatty acids, lysophosphatidylcholines and phosphatidylcholines, in the liver."( Metabolomic and lipidomic analysis of the effect of pioglitazone on hepatic steatosis in a rat model of obese Type 2 diabetes.
Jung, ES; Kim, DH; Lee, CH; Liu, KH; Park, CY; Suh, DH; Yang, H, 2018
)
1.45
"Pioglitazone treatment increased the amounts of pro-resolving lipid mediators including lipoxin B"( Modulation of lipid mediator profile may contribute to amelioration of chronic inflammation in adipose tissue of obese mice by pioglitazone.
Hosooka, T; Ogawa, W; Okada, K; Shinohara, M, 2018
)
1.41
"Pioglitazone treatment started at the first signs of fibrosis in both models."( Pioglitazone Reduces Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development in Two Rodent Models of Cirrhosis.
Arora, G; Baumert, TF; Erstad, DJ; Fuchs, BC; Ghoshal, S; Hoshida, Y; Lanuti, M; Li, S; Masia, R; Sojoodi, M; Tanabe, KK, 2019
)
2.68
"Pioglitazone treatment improved features of the metabolic syndrome."( Increased production and reduced urinary buffering of acid in uric acid stone formers is ameliorated by pioglitazone.
Adams-Huet, B; Maalouf, NM; Moe, OW; Poindexter, JR; Sakhaee, K, 2019
)
1.45
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly increased TRX1 protein level in heart and aorta tissues in MetS group. "( Cardiovascular protective effect of pioglitazone on oxidative stress in rats with metabolic syndrome.
Bilginoglu, A, 2019
)
2.23
"Pioglitazone treatment in adult BHR caused no detectable changes in antioxidant and detoxificant responses."( Age-dependent effect of PPARγ agonist pioglitazone on kidney signaling in borderline hypertensive rats.
Dovinova, I; Grešová, L; Kvandova, M; Kvasnicka, P, 2019
)
1.51
"Pioglitazone-treated patients showed a significant increase in HDL-C compared to placebo group (6.3 mg/dl vs 3.0 mg/dl; p<0.01) in addition to a greater reduction in the extent of MS (-13.2 vs -4.9; p=0.0055). "( Pioglitazone Randomised Italian Study on Metabolic Syndrome (PRISMA): effect of pioglitazone with metformin on HDL-C levels in Type 2 diabetic patients.
Bravi, F; Brunetti, P; Chinea, B; Comaschi, M; Cucinotta, D; Di Pietro, C; Egan, CG; Genovese, S; Passaro, A, 2013
)
3.28
"Pioglitazone pretreatment also suppressed NF-κB activation and altered GFAP overexpression."( Protective effect of pioglitazone on retinal ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats.
Xiao, YQ; Ye, W; Zhang, XY; Zhang, Y, 2013
)
1.43
"Pioglitazone treatment increased energy expenditure and improved insulin resistance, hypotriglyceridaemia and liver steatosis in these mice."( Thiazolidinediones partially reverse the metabolic disturbances observed in Bscl2/seipin-deficient mice.
Capeau, J; Cariou, B; Costet, P; Dollet, L; Fève, B; Lathrop, M; Le May, C; Magré, J; Matsuda, F; Mounier, C; Nemani, M; Pillot, B; Prieur, X; Takahashi, M; Takigawa-Imamura, H; Zelenika, D, 2013
)
1.11
"Pioglitazone treatment improved plasma Glc and adiponectin levels, and decreased pro-inflammatory cytokines."( Pioglitazone reduces inflammation through inhibition of NF-κB in polymicrobial sepsis.
Chima, R; Kaplan, J; Nowell, M; Zingarelli, B, 2014
)
2.57
"One pioglitazone-treated and three placebo-treated women experienced confirmed fractures."( Effects of pioglitazone on bone in postmenopausal women with impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Bone, HG; Lindsay, R; McClung, MR; Perez, AT; Raanan, MG; Spanheimer, RG, 2013
)
1.26
"In pioglitazone pre-treated groups, a TUNEL assay indicated a high level of apoptosis in SAP but little apoptosis in MAP, showing pioglitazone could promote taurocholate-induced apoptosis but inhibit ceruleininduced apoptosis in pancraeatic aniniar cells."( Effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ activation on apoptosis in rats with acute pancreatitis.
Chen, C; Lou, XL; Xu, P; Yang, ZW, 2013
)
0.9
"Pioglitazone treatment was associated with reductions in limb perfusion at 2 weeks measured by contrast-enhanced ultrasound and Tc(99m)-Sestamibi SPECT-CT."( Pioglitazone inhibits HIF-1α-dependent angiogenesis in rats by paracrine and direct effects on endothelial cells.
Dromparis, P; McMurtry, MS; Michelakis, ED; Paulin, R; Proctor, S; Sutendra, G, 2014
)
2.57
"Pioglitazone treatment decreases portosystemic shunting via modulation of splanchnic inflammation and neoangiogenesis. "( Pioglitazone decreases portosystemic shunting by modulating inflammation and angiogenesis in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic portal hypertensive rats.
Angermayr, B; Boucher, Y; Fuhrmann, V; Grahovac, J; Horvatits, T; Klein, S; Mitterhauser, M; Payer, BA; Peck-Radosavljevic, M; Reiberger, T; Schwabl, P; Stift, J; Trauner, M; Trebicka, J, 2014
)
3.29
"Pioglitazone treatment suppressed mRNA and protein expression of fetuin-A in Fao hepatoma cells."( Direct inhibitory effects of pioglitazone on hepatic fetuin-A expression.
Emoto, M; Fukumoto, S; Imanishi, Y; Inaba, M; Ishimura, E; Koyama, H; Mori, K; Morioka, T; Motoyama, K; Nakatani, S; Ochi, A, 2014
)
1.41
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly suppressed myocardial apoptosis (21.4%∓8.8%,17.3%∓8.7%, 40.1%∓12.3%, P<0.05) following I/R injury and up-regulated myocardial PGC-lα expression at both the mRNA and protein levels (P<0.05), but these effects were antagonized by GW9662 (P<0.05)."( [Effects of pioglitazone on myocardial peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma co-activator lα expression in rats with myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury].
Shen, L; Wang, H; Ye, P, 2014
)
2.22
"Pioglitazone treatment also resulted in increased expression of markers of mitochondrial biogenesis in brown adipose tissue and white adipose tissue, with mild elevations observed in animals treated with alogliptin alone."( Administration of pioglitazone alone or with alogliptin delays diabetes onset in UCD-T2DM rats.
Bettaieb, A; Cummings, BP; Graham, JL; Haj, FG; Havel, PJ; Stanhope, K, 2014
)
1.46
"In pioglitazone-treated subjects, plasma adiponectin concentration increased threefold from 13 ± 0.5 to 38 ± 2.5 μg/mL (P < 0.001) and was strongly correlated with the improvement in SI (r = 0.436, P < 0.001) and modestly correlated with glucose area under the curve during oral glucose tolerance test (r = 0.238, P < 0.005) and insulin secretion/insulin resistance index (r = 0.306, P < 0.005)."( Baseline adiponectin levels do not influence the response to pioglitazone in ACT NOW.
Banerji, M; Bray, GA; Buchanan, TA; Clement, SC; DeFronzo, RA; Gastaldelli, A; Henry, RR; Kitabchi, AE; Mudaliar, S; Musi, N; Ratner, RE; Reaven, PD; Schwenke, DC; Stentz, FB; Tripathy, D, 2014
)
1.16
"Pioglitazone treatment decreased the mRNA expression levels of these cytokines compared with the respective values in the CLP group."( Pioglitazone attenuates lung injury by modulating adipose inflammation.
Kobayashi, M; Kutsukake, M; Matsuda, A; Matsutani, T; Tachikawa, E; Tamura, K; Uchida, E, 2014
)
2.57
"Pioglitazone treatment resulted in a change in augmentation index of -4.7% units (95% confidence interval [95% CI] -7.9, -1.5) (P = 0.004) and in diastolic blood pressure of -3.0 mm Hg (95% CI -5.7, -0.2) (P = 0.03), but did not significantly change aortic PWV (P = 0.33) or reactive hyperemia index (P = 0.46). "( Reversing vascular dysfunction in rheumatoid arthritis: improved augmentation index but not endothelial function with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonist therapy.
Bian, A; Cunningham, A; Oeser, AM; Ormseth, MJ; Shintani, A; Solus, J; Stein, CM; Tanner, SB, 2014
)
1.85
"∆2-pioglitazone treatment did not trigger cells to enter apoptosis but enhanced the autophagy process."( Evaluation of ∆2-pioglitazone, an analogue of pioglitazone, on colon cancer cell survival: Evidence of drug treatment association with autophagy and activation of the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway.
Chaimbault, P; Huber, S; Schohn, H; Valente, S, 2014
)
1.26
"Pioglitazone treatment increased the cross-sectional area of adipocytes by 18% (p = 0.01), and also increased capillary density without affecting larger vessels. "( Pioglitazone treatment reduces adipose tissue inflammation through reduction of mast cell and macrophage number and by improving vascularity.
Adu, A; Finlin, BS; Kern, PA; Peterson, CA; Rasouli, N; Shipp, LR; Spencer, M; Yang, L; Zhu, B, 2014
)
3.29
"The pioglitazone treatment group showed synovial expression of TNF-α, and IFN-γ was significantly lower than in the control group; the inhibition rates were 78.5 and 60.4%."( PPAR-γ agonist pioglitazone affects rat gouty arthritis by regulating cytokines.
Jiang, DM; Wang, RC, 2014
)
1.24
"Pioglitazone treatment restored in vivo muscle oxidative capacity in diabetic rats to the level of lean controls."( Pioglitazone treatment restores in vivo muscle oxidative capacity in a rat model of diabetes.
Ciapaite, J; Houten, SM; Nicolay, K; Prompers, JJ; van den Broek, NM; Wessels, B, 2015
)
2.58
"Pioglitazone treatment lowered IGT conversion to diabetes (hazard ratio = 0.25; 95% confidence interval = 0.13-0.50; P < .0001). "( A novel insulin resistance index to monitor changes in insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance: the ACT NOW study.
Adam, KP; Banerji, M; Bray, GA; Buchanan, TA; Clement, SC; Cobb, JE; DeFronzo, RA; Ferrannini, E; Gall, W; George, T; Henry, RR; Kitabchi, AE; Mudaliar, S; Musi, N; Ratner, RE; Reaven, PD; Schwenke, DC; Stentz, FB; Tripathy, D, 2015
)
1.86
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly decreased serum RBP4 levels in obese rats, which was correlated with reduced body weight and increased insulin sensitivity. "( Pioglitazone lowers serum retinol binding protein 4 by suppressing its expression in adipose tissue of obese rats.
Han, J; Jia, W; Liu, X; Wei, L; Xiao, Y; Zhang, J; Zhu, C, 2015
)
3.3
"Pioglitazone treatment normalized mitoflash frequency and morphology while restored mitochondrial respiratory function and insulin sensitivity in 12 weeks mt-cpYFP db/db mice."( Mitoflash altered by metabolic stress in insulin-resistant skeletal muscle.
Cheng, H; Ding, Y; Fang, H; Hou, N; Ma, Q; Pan, L; Shang, W; Sun, T; Sun, X; Wang, X; Xiao, Y; Zhang, X; Zhou, J, 2015
)
1.14
"With pioglitazone-treatment, diabetic animals remained euglycemic and treatment was able to reverse the clearance changes, although incompletely."( Effect of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Nephropathy on IgG Pharmacokinetics and Subcutaneous Bioavailability in the Rat.
Chadha, GS; Morris, ME, 2015
)
0.87
"Pioglitazone treatment reduced the mRNA levels of inflammatory cytokines (monocyte chemoattractant factor-1, interleukin-1, and interleukin-6) that are primarily produced by macrophages in the cerebral arteries."( Protective Role of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ in the Development of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture.
Furukawa, H; Hashimoto, T; Kitazato, KT; Korai, M; Kuwabara, A; Lawton, MT; Nagahiro, S; Shikata, F; Shimada, K; Tada, Y; Wada, K; Wei, Y, 2015
)
1.14
"Pioglitazone treatment of BKS db/db mice produced a significant weight gain, restored glycemic control, and normalized measures of serum oxidative stress and triglycerides but had no effect on LDLs or total cholesterol."( The Metabolic Syndrome and Microvascular Complications in a Murine Model of Type 2 Diabetes.
Backus, C; Brosius, FC; Dauch, JR; Feldman, EL; Hayes, JM; Hinder, LM; Hur, J; Kretzler, M; Pennathur, S, 2015
)
1.14
"Pioglitazone treatment resulted in exacerbated hepatic steatosis and increased hepatic triglyceride and free fatty acids concentrations, though significantly increased the glucose infusion rate in hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp test."( Effect of Chronic Pioglitazone Treatment on Hepatic Gene Expression Profile in Obese C57BL/6J Mice.
Hou, S; Huan, Y; Jia, C; Jiang, Q; Li, C; Liu, Q; Liu, S; Shen, Z; Sun, S; Wang, Y, 2015
)
1.47
"Pioglitazone treatment suppressed excess lipid accumulation and superoxide production in the aorta in an angiotensin II-induced rat model of hypertension."( Pioglitazone Reduces Vascular Lipid Accumulation in Angiotensin II-Induced Hypertensive Rat.
Higashikuni, Y; Hongo, M; Imai, Y; Ishizaka, N; Koike, K; Komuro, I; Nagai, R; Sakamoto, A, 2015
)
3.3
"Pioglitazone treatment abrogated renal oxidative stress (decreased reduced glutathione and catalase activity and increased malondialdehyde), elevated serum cytokine (interleukin-6, interleukin-10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and transforming growth factor-beta1) and Fas induced by MTX."( Pioglitazone ameliorates methotrexate-induced renal endothelial dysfunction via amending detrimental changes in some antioxidant parameters, systemic cytokines and Fas production.
El-Gowelli, HM; El-Gowilly, SM; Helmy, MM, 2015
)
2.58
"Pioglitazone treatment incompletely reversed the disease-related PK changes."( An Extended Minimal Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model: Evaluation of Type II Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Nephropathy on Human IgG Pharmacokinetics in Rats.
Chadha, GS; Morris, ME, 2015
)
1.14
"Pioglitazone treatment resulted in a decrease in cardiomyocyte apoptosis as revealed by a decrease in cardiac caspase-3, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels and DNA fragmentation, and an increase in Na+K+ATPase levels in diabetic rats. "( Protective effect of pioglitazone on cardiomyocyte apoptosis in low-dose streptozotocin & high-fat diet-induced type-2 diabetes in rats.
Bhandari, U; Khanna, G; Kumar, P; Kumar, V; Tripathi, CD, 2015
)
2.18
"Pioglitazone treatment improved survival, reduced PASP, muscularization of small pulmonary arteries, and medial wall thickness."( Pioglitazone alleviates cardiac and vascular remodelling and improves survival in monocrotaline induced pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Baldus, S; Behringer, A; Berghausen, EM; Blaschke, F; Caglayan, E; Er, F; Gassanov, N; Kappert, K; Odenthal, M; Rosenkranz, S; Ten Freyhaus, H; Trappiel, M; Wellnhofer, E, 2016
)
2.6
"Pioglitazone treatment afforded anti-oxidant effect and renoprotection in a dose-dependent manner in rats."( Pioglitazone ameliorates renal ischemia reperfusion injury through NMDA receptor antagonism in rats.
Bedi, PM; Singh, AP; Singh, N, 2016
)
2.6
"Pioglitazone treatment also was associated with improvement in individual histologic scores, including the fibrosis score (treatment difference, -0.5 [CI, -0.9 to 0.0]; P = 0.039); reduced hepatic triglyceride content from 19% to 7% (treatment difference, -7 percentage points [CI, -10 to -4 percentage points]; P < 0.001); and improved adipose tissue, hepatic, and muscle insulin sensitivity (P < 0.001 vs."( Long-Term Pioglitazone Treatment for Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Trial.
Bril, F; Cusi, K; Darland, C; Hardies, J; Hecht, J; Lomonaco, R; Musi, N; Orsak, B; Ortiz-Lopez, C; Portillo-Sanchez, P; Tio, F; Webb, A, 2016
)
1.56
"Pioglitazone treatment rescued a third of these proteins, mainly those associated with oxidative stress, promotion of cerebrovascular vasocontractile tone, and vascular compliance."( Proteomic differences in brain vessels of Alzheimer's disease mice: Normalization by PPARγ agonist pioglitazone.
Badhwar, A; Brown, R; Hamel, E; Haqqani, AS; Stanimirovic, DB, 2017
)
1.39
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly inhibited various effector T cell differentiations including Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells from female naïve T cells, but it selectively reduced IL-17 production in male Th17 differentiation."( Sex-Based Selectivity of PPARγ Regulation in Th1, Th2, and Th17 Differentiation.
Bothwell, AL; Choi, JM; Lee, JU; Park, HJ; Park, HS, 2016
)
1.16
"Pioglitazone-treated mice showed identical weight gain, body fat distribution, and insulin sensitivity compared with controls."( Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor-γ Activation Augments the β-Cell Unfolded Protein Response and Rescues Early Glycemic Deterioration and β Cell Death in Non-obese Diabetic Mice.
Colvin, SC; Maganti, AV; Maier, B; Mirmira, RG; Nelson, JB; Syed, F; Tersey, SA, 2016
)
1.16
"Pioglitazone-pretreated ASCs had a more potent therapeutic effect than non-pretreated ASCs in the repair of both elastase-induced and smoke-induced emphysema models (mean linear intercept, 78.1±2.5 μm vs 83.2±2.6 μm in elastase models and 75.6±1.4 μm vs 80.5±3.2 μm in smoke models, P<0.05)."( Therapeutic effects of adipose-derived stem cells pretreated with pioglitazone in an emphysema mouse model.
Hong, SH; Hong, Y; Kim, YS; Oh, YM, 2016
)
1.39
"Pioglitazone treatment enhanced ST2"( PPAR-γ agonist ameliorates liver pathology accompanied by increasing regulatory B and T cells in high-fat-diet mice.
Chen, L; Fu, Z; Hou, M; Ji, M; Liu, R; Ni, Y; Song, J; Sun, H; Wang, G; Xu, Z; Yang, B; Zhu, Y, 2017
)
1.18
"Pioglitazone treatment reduced mean plasma fasting glucose and mean peak postprandial glucose levels. "( Pioglitazone decreases fasting and postprandial endogenous glucose production in proportion to decrease in hepatic triglyceride content.
Cobelli, C; Dalla Man, C; English, PT; Firbank, MJ; Gerrard, J; Lane, A; Ravikumar, B; Taylor, R, 2008
)
3.23
"Pioglitazone treatment also shifted myocardial substrate utilization towards greater contribution of glucose in both groups, as evidenced by decreased rate of palmitate oxidation and higher 2-deoxyglucose uptake and elevated glycogen content."( Pioglitazone induces lipid accumulation in the rat heart despite concomitant reduction in plasma free fatty acid availability.
Baranowski, M; Blachnio-Zabielska, A; Gorski, J; Zabielski, P, 2008
)
2.51
"Pioglitazone treatment improved insulin-stimulated glucose metabolism and GS activity in PCOS (all P < 0.05) and restored the ability of insulin to dephosphorylate GS at sites 2 and 2a."( Impaired insulin activation and dephosphorylation of glycogen synthase in skeletal muscle of women with polycystic ovary syndrome is reversed by pioglitazone treatment.
Andersen, NR; Beck-Nielsen, H; Glintborg, D; Hansen, BF; Højlund, K; Wojtaszewski, JF, 2008
)
1.27
"Pioglitazone treatment in obese women with the Pro/Ala genotype induced a greater glucose decrease, and obese women may derive more benefit from this drug."( Effect of the Pro12Ala polymorphism of the PPAR gamma 2 gene on response to pioglitazone treatment in menopausal women.
Fajardo-Araujo, M; Garza, SM; Malacara, JM; Pérez-Luque, E; Ramírez-Salazar, M,
)
1.08
"Pioglitazone treatment also ameliorated left ventricular hypertrophy and fibrosis, improved diastolic function, and increased both the serum adiponectin concentration and the level of AMP-activated protein kinase phosphorylation in the heart."( Pioglitazone attenuates cardiac hypertrophy in rats with salt-sensitive hypertension: role of activation of AMP-activated protein kinase and inhibition of Akt.
Cheng, XW; Kato, MF; Koike, Y; Miyachi, M; Murate, T; Murohara, T; Nagata, K; Nishizawa, T; Noda, A; Obata, K; Shibata, R; Tsuboi, K; Yamada, T; Yazawa, H; Yokota, M, 2008
)
2.51
"Pioglitazone treatment increases VLDL-triacylglycerol clearance, but the role of de novo lipogenesis (DNL) has not been explored, and no direct comparison has been made between the thiazolidinediones (TZDs)."( A pilot study of the effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone on de novo lipogenesis in type 2 diabetes.
Beysen, C; Boyle, PJ; Decaris, M; Fong, A; Hellerstein, MK; Murphy, EJ; Nagaraja, H; Riiff, T, 2008
)
1.35
"Pioglitazone treatment reduced the infarct size and improved neurological functions."( Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorsgamma (PPARgamma) differently modulate the interleukin-6 expression in the peri-infarct cortical tissue in the acute and delayed phases of cerebral ischaemia.
Culman, J; Gohlke, P; Herdegen, T; Patzer, A; Stöck, I; Zhao, Y, 2008
)
1.07
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly improved insulin sensitivity without affecting testosterone, body composition, MCP-1, MIP-1alpha and MIF levels."( Plasma monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha are increased in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and associated with adiposity, but unaffected by pioglitazone treatment.
Andersen, M; Bruun, JM; Glintborg, D; Richelsen, B, 2009
)
1.26
"Pioglitazone treatment reduced the severity of ulceration, repressed levels of TNF-alpha, IL-1beta and nuclear p65 subunit as well as increased the abundance of PPAR-gamma in gastric mucosa."( Involvement of glucocorticoid receptor and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma in pioglitazone mediated chronic gastric ulcer healing in rats.
Lahiri, S; Palit, G; Sen, T, 2009
)
1.29
"Pioglitazone pretreatment also attenuated the oxidative stress and DNA fragmentation after cerebral IR injury."( Protective effects of pioglitazone against global cerebral ischemic-reperfusion injury in gerbils.
Iyer, S; Kaundal, RK; Kumar, A; Sharma, SS, 2009
)
1.39
"Pioglitazone treatment increased direct costs by CHF 10,914 per patient over a lifetime horizon."( Cost-effectiveness of pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and a history of macrovascular disease in a Swiss setting.
Brändle, M; Erdmann, E; Erny-Albrecht, KM; Goodall, G; Valentine, WJ, 2009
)
1.39
"Pioglitazone treatment of atherogenic mice prevented this progression of atherosclerosis from its middle stages of disease, but was not able to reverse it."( Atherosclerosis in LDLR-knockout mice is inhibited, but not reversed, by the PPARgamma ligand pioglitazone.
Gotto, AM; Hajjar, DP; Han, J; Nakaya, H; Nicholson, AC; Summers, BD, 2009
)
1.29
"Pioglitazone treatment might suppress in-stent neointimal proliferation and reduce incidence of TLR after PCI in patients with T2DM."( A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial to assess efficacy of pioglitazone on in-stent neointimal suppression in type 2 diabetes: POPPS (Prevention of In-Stent Neointimal Proliferation by Pioglitazone Study).
Fitzgerald, PJ; Honda, Y; Ikeno, F; Ito, A; Kataoka, T; Kobayashi, Y; Okura, H; Sakanoue, Y; Shimeno, K; Taguchi, H; Takagi, T; Tamita, K; Toda, I; Waseda, K; Yamamuro, A; Yamasaki, M; Yanagi, S; Yoshikawa, J; Yoshiyama, M, 2009
)
2.03
"Pioglitazone (Pio) treatment induces weight gain in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which could worsen hepatic lipid accumulation, and alter adiponectin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)."( Pioglitazone, but not metformin, reduces liver fat in Type-2 diabetes mellitus independent of weight changes.
Bray, GA; Greenway, FL; Gupta, AK; Johnson, WD; Martin, CK; Smith, SR,
)
3.02
"Pioglitazone treatment led to reduction of the bone formation marker osteocalcin, whereas balaglitazone treatment did not affect it."( A comparison of glycemic control, water retention, and musculoskeletal effects of balaglitazone and pioglitazone in diet-induced obese rats.
Beck-Nielsen, H; Byrjalsen, I; Christiansen, C; Henriksen, K; Karsdal, MA; Larsen, LK; Madsen, AN; Nielsen, RH, 2009
)
1.29
"Pioglitazone-treated mice showed improvement in insulin resistance, adipokine, and lipid profile."( The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist pioglitazone improves cardiometabolic risk and renal inflammation in murine lupus.
Brosius, FC; Hodgin, JB; Kaplan, MJ; Kretzler, M; Park, JL; Pennathur, S; Randolph, A; Somers, EC; Thacker, SG; Wang, JH; Zhang, H; Zhao, W, 2009
)
1.32
"Pioglitazone treatment with low-dose cyclosporine has synergistic protective effects for cardiac allografts and recipient kidneys, leading to improvement of graft survival with a minimal cyclosporine-induced nephrotoxicity."( Renoprotective immunosuppression by pioglitazone with low-dose cyclosporine in rat heart transplantation.
Chen, Z; Hasegawa, T; Okada, K; Okita, Y; Tanaka, Y, 2009
)
1.35
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly improved the insulin sensitivity index (placebo: 0.35 +/- 0.16 micromol/kg . "( Pioglitazone treatment enlarges subcutaneous adipocytes in insulin-resistant patients.
de Graaf, J; Hermus, AR; Koenen, TB; Kroese, JM; Stalenhoef, AF; Stienstra, R; Sweep, FC; Tack, CJ; van der Laak, J; van Tits, LJ, 2009
)
3.24
"Pioglitazone treatment increased the insulin sensitivity index compared with the control group (-0.8 +/- 3.1x10(-)(2) vs +1.1 +/- 3.7x10(-)(2), P = 0.036)."( Effects of pioglitazone on subclinical atherosclerosis and insulin resistance in nondiabetic renal allograft recipients.
Cha, BS; Choi, SH; Han, SJ; Hur, KY; Kang, ES; Kim, DJ; Kim, MS; Kim, SI; Kim, YS; Kwak, JY; Lee, HC, 2010
)
1.47
"Pioglitazone treatment ameliorated insulin resistance with concomitant reduction in serum visfatin, free fatty acid, and triglyceride (TG) of the rats fed HF."( Effect of pioglitazone on visfatin expression in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and SD rats.
Lv, Q; Wang, L; Wang, W; Wang, Y; Zhou, X, 2009
)
1.48
"Pioglitazone treatment (2 wk) ameliorated dysmetabolism, increased islet insulin content, restored glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, and preserved beta-cell mass in db/db mice but had no significant effects in m/m mice."( Molecular mechanism by which pioglitazone preserves pancreatic beta-cells in obese diabetic mice: evidence for acute and chronic actions as a PPARgamma agonist.
Hamamoto, S; Hashiramoto, M; Kaku, K; Kanda, Y; Kawasaki, F; Matsuki, M; Nakashima, K; Shimoda, M; Tawaramoto, K, 2010
)
1.37
"Pioglitazone-treated rats exhibited significantly increased membrane/total (cytosolic plus membrane) ratio of both PKC-epsilon and PKC-theta isoforms compared to untreated controls."( Long-term pioglitazone treatment augments insulin sensitivity and PKC-epsilon and PKC-theta activation in skeletal muscles in sucrose fed rats.
Kazdová, L; Marková, I; Mlejnek, P; Musilová, A; Pravenec, M; Šimáková, M; Zídek, V, 2010
)
1.48
"Pioglitazone pretreatment significantly reduced liver enzyme content (ALT, 176.80 +/- 13.75 vs 235.28 +/- 31.92 and AST, 748.20 +/- 79.29 vs 944.85 +/- 101.87) and TNF-alpha level (9:8.60 +/- 8.67 vs 138.28 +/- 9.99) after I/R compared with the control group. "( Pioglitazone attenuates ischemia/reperfusion-induced liver injury in rats.
Asl, NA; Azar, AN; Estakhri, R; Haghjou, AG; Hajipour, B; Somi, MH; Vatankhah, AM; Zade, MN, 2009
)
3.24
"Pioglitazone treatment for 12 weeks decreased serum hsCRP levels (0.83 [1.14] to 0.52 [0.82] mg/L, P < .001) and improved glycemic control (fasting glucose, P < .001; glycosylated hemoglobin, P < .001) and lipid profiles (triglyceride, P = .016; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, P < .001)."( Fat redistribution preferentially reflects the anti-inflammatory benefits of pioglitazone treatment.
Ahn, CW; Cha, BS; Kang, ES; Kim, HJ; Kim, SK; Lee, BW; Lee, HC; Moon, JH, 2011
)
1.32
"The pioglitazone-treated carriers of the D allele showed an attenuation of MaxIMT as compared with the diet-treated carriers."( Genetic risk factors and the anti-atherosclerotic effect of pioglitazone on carotid atherosclerosis of subjects with type 2 diabetes--a retrospective study.
Kaneto, H; Katakami, N; Kawamori, R; Matsuhisa, M; Osonoi, T; Saitou, M; Yamasaki, Y, 2010
)
1.08
"Pioglitazone treatment of atherogenic mice prevented this progression of atherosclerosis from its middle stages of disease."( [Roles of PPARgamma in preventing the development of atherosclerosis in LDL receptor null mice].
Nakaya, H, 2010
)
1.08
"Both pioglitazone and metformin treatment were associated with significant reductions in hyperglycemia, HOMA-IR and HbA1c levels."( Effect of pioglitazone on various parameters of insulin resistance including lipoprotein subclass according to particle size by a gel-permeation high-performance liquid chromatography in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes.
Adachi, T; Fujinami, A; Fukui, M; Hara, H; Hasegawa, G; Ishihara, K; Kitagawa, Y; Nakamura, N; Nakano, K; Obayashi, H; Ogata, M; Ohta, M; Takashima, T; Yamasaki, M, 2010
)
1.22
"Pioglitazone treatment was associated with a significant improvement in oral glucose tolerance in the obese animals (p<0.05 compared with untreated obese)."( Pioglitazone improves superoxide dismutase mediated vascular reactivity in the obese Zucker rat.
Bryer-Ash, M; Dorafshar, AH; Khoe, M; Lyon, C; Moodley, K, 2010
)
2.52
"Pioglitazone treatment resulted in better glycemic control, improved lipid levels, an increase in insulin sensitivity and adiponectin levels, and a decrease in inflammatory markers, thus improving the risk factors of cardiovascular disease. "( Clinical effectiveness and safety evaluation of long-term pioglitazone treatment for erythropoietin responsiveness and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients on hemodialysis.
Abe, M; Maruyama, N; Maruyama, T; Matsumoto, K; Okada, K; Soma, M, 2010
)
2.05
"pioglitazone treatment increased fat mass and the surface area of adipocytes more than rosiglitazone at dosages with equivalent effects on plasma glucose. "( Differential modulatory effects of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone on white adipose tissue in db/db mice.
Gang, GT; Hwang, JH; Kim, YH; Lee, CH; Noh, JR; Yang, KJ; Yang, SJ; Yeom, YI, 2010
)
2.05
"Pioglitazone treatment altered fat distribution, improved insulin sensitivity and normalized lipid and insulin level in rats on the high-fat diet."( Pioglitazone attenuates prostatic enlargement in diet-induced insulin-resistant rats by altering lipid distribution and hyperinsulinaemia.
Jena, G; Ramarao, P; Vikram, A, 2010
)
2.52
"Pioglitazone treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus produced significant improvements in glycaemic control, plasma lipids, blood pressure and inflammation. "( Pioglitazone improves ventricular diastolic function in patients with diabetes mellitus: a tissue Doppler study.
Alemdar, R; Aydin, M; Basar, C; Caglar, O; Ordu, S; Ozhan, H; Yalcin, S; Yazici, M, 2010
)
3.25
"Pioglitazone treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus produced significant improvements in measures of glycaemic control and diastolic ventricular function."( Pioglitazone improves ventricular diastolic function in patients with diabetes mellitus: a tissue Doppler study.
Alemdar, R; Aydin, M; Basar, C; Caglar, O; Ordu, S; Ozhan, H; Yalcin, S; Yazici, M, 2010
)
3.25
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly increased body mass index (P<0.05) and waist circumference (P<0.05) and decreased triglycerides (P<0.05) and HOMA-IR (P<0.01)."( Effect of pioglitazone on serum concentrations of osteoprotegerin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Ahn, CW; Cha, BS; Cho, MH; Kim, KR; Lee, HC; Nam, JS; Park, JS; Yoo, JS, 2011
)
1.49
"Pioglitazone treatment of virally-infected smoke-exposed mice proved more efficacious than the steroid intervention."( Treating viral exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: insights from a mouse model of cigarette smoke and H1N1 influenza infection.
Bauer, CM; Botelho, FM; Brown, EG; Lambert, KN; Mossman, KL; Stämpfli, MR; Taylor, JD; Zavitz, CC, 2010
)
1.08
"Pioglitazone treatment of RAW264.7 murine macrophages were compared with those of simply cultured control and RANKL-mediated control. "( [Effect of pioglitazone on receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B expression in osteoclast from RAW264.7 cells].
Cheng, P; Ding, GX; Jiang, M; Liu, J; Lü, S; Wu, L, 2010
)
2.19
"Pioglitazone-treated patients demonstrated greater increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and reductions in glycated hemoglobin, triglycerides, and C-reactive protein. "( Lowering the triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio is associated with the beneficial impact of pioglitazone on progression of coronary atherosclerosis in diabetic patients: insights from the PERISCOPE (Pioglitazone Effect on Regression o
Bayturan, O; Kupfer, S; Lavoie, A; Nesto, R; Nicholls, SJ; Nissen, SE; Perez, A; Tuzcu, EM; Uno, K; Wolski, K, 2011
)
2.02
"Pioglitazone treatment also improved all the antioxidants levels showing activity against oxidative stress induced by BCCAO."( Neuroprotective effect of pioglitazone on acute phase changes induced by partial global cerebral ischemia in mice.
Aggarwal, R; Chakrabarti, A; Medhi, B, 2010
)
1.38
"Pioglitazone treatment up-regulates telomerase activity, telomere-stabilizing proteins and reduces senescence markers in vascular cells. "( Pioglitazone activates aortic telomerase and prevents stress-induced endothelial apoptosis.
Böhm, M; Gensch, C; Haendeler, J; Laufs, U; Pöss, J; Werner, C, 2011
)
3.25
"Pioglitazone treatment (3 mg/kg body weight/d for 6 weeks), a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonist, reversibly improved atherogenic dyslipidemia and insulin resistance and fully restored flow-mediated dilation with persistent benefits."( Rhesus macaques develop metabolic syndrome with reversible vascular dysfunction responsive to pioglitazone.
Cheng, H; Ding, Y; Han, C; Hou, N; Huang, PL; Li, C; Li, K; Liu, N; Liu, Y; Mao, J; Raab, S; Sebokova, E; Shang, S; Song, Z; Wang, H; Wang, J; Xue, L; Zhang, H; Zhang, R; Zhang, X; Zhang, Y; Zheng, W; Zhu, T, 2011
)
1.31
"Pioglitazone-treated monkeys also showed a dose-dependent modulation of CD68-ir inflammatory cells, that was significantly decreased for 5 mg/kg treated animals compared to placebo (P = 0.018)."( The PPAR-γ agonist pioglitazone modulates inflammation and induces neuroprotection in parkinsonian monkeys.
Bondarenko, V; Brunner, K; Emborg, ME; Joers, V; Johnson, JA; Kemnitz, JW; Simmons, HA; Swanson, CR; Ziegler, TE, 2011
)
1.42
"Pioglitazone treatment reduced the number of Ki-67-positive proliferating cells in the neointima of the vein grafts at 14 days after implantation in the pioglitazone group (4.1% ± 1.1%) vs the controls (16.8% ± 1.7%; P < .05)."( Pioglitazone prevents intimal hyperplasia in experimental rabbit vein grafts.
Komori, K; Maehara, Y; Morisaki, K; Murohara, T; Ouchi, N; Shibata, R; Takahashi, N, 2011
)
2.53
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly increased phosphorylated (p-) Akt but significantly reduced p-ERK1/2 and p-JNK."( PPAR-γ activator pioglitazone prevents age-related atrial fibrillation susceptibility by improving antioxidant capacity and reducing apoptosis in a rat model.
Aonuma, K; Hirayama, A; Igarashi, M; Ito, Y; Murakoshi, N; Seo, Y; Tada, H; Xu, D, 2012
)
1.44
"Pioglitazone treatment (n = 10) reduced hepatic fat as assessed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy, despite a significant increase in body weight (Δ = 3.7 kg); plasma FGF21 levels did not change (1.9  ±  0.6 to 2.2  ±  0.6 ng/ml [mean ± SEM])."( Exenatide decreases hepatic fibroblast growth factor 21 resistance in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a mouse model of obesity and in a randomised controlled trial.
Bajaj, M; Chan, L; Gonzalez, EV; Gutierrez, A; Jogi, M; Krishnamurthy, R; Muthupillai, R; Samson, SL; Sathyanarayana, P, 2011
)
1.09
"Pioglitazone treatment before or after induction of ALI significantly diminished alveolar (reduction by 73% and 67%, respectively) and interstitial neutrophil influx (reduction by 55% and 63%, respectively) and reduced lung permeability changes (reduction by 64% and 58%, respectively) indicating a protective role of pioglitazone treatment in ALI."( Pioglitazone attenuates endotoxin-induced acute lung injury by reducing neutrophil recruitment.
Grommes, J; Mörgelin, M; Soehnlein, O, 2012
)
2.54
"Pioglitazone treatment also significantly increased subcutaneous AT expression of CEBPβ mRNA."( Restoration of adipose function in obese glucose-tolerant men following pioglitazone treatment is associated with CCAAT enhancer-binding protein β up-regulation.
Crowe, P; Kankara, C; McCance, DR; McGinty, A; McPeake, J; Powell, LA; Trimble, ER; Young, IS, 2012
)
1.33
"Pioglitazone treatment improved hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), plasma glucose, insulin levels, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance score and increased serum adiponectin levels during the 16-week run-in phase and maintained these improvements during the standard-care phase."( Chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients with insulin resistance treated with pioglitazone and peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin.
Hamzeh, FM; Han, J; Harrison, SA; Pandya, PK; Sheikh, MY; Vierling, JM, 2012
)
1.33
"Pioglitazone treatment (2.5mg/kg/day) reduced the amount of triglycerides in the kidney of the angiotensin II-induced hypertensive rat without significantly altering either blood pressure levels or mRNA expression of lipogenic genes in the kidney."( Reduction of renal lipid content and proteinuria by a PPAR-γ agonist in a rat model of angiotensin II-induced hypertension.
Hongo, M; Ishizaka, N; Nagai, R; Saito, K; Sakamoto, A, 2012
)
1.1
"Pioglitazone treatment revealed a podocyte-protective capacity in patients with type 2 diabetes, and the underlying mechanisms may be partly attributed to its effective suppression of excessive local renal inflammation."( Podocyte as a potential target of inflammation: role of pioglitazone hydrochloride in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Chen, Y; Hu, Y; Xing, Y; Ye, S,
)
1.82
"In pioglitazone-treated animals, AA and TAS increased above control values while GSH and PCG were normalized."( Oxidative/nitrosative stress and protein damages in aqueous humor of hyperglycemic rabbits: effects of two oral antidiabetics, pioglitazone and repaglinide.
Gumieniczek, A; Owczarek, B; Pawlikowska, B, 2012
)
1.1
"Oral pioglitazone treatment was applied for 6 months."( Pioglitazone therapy in progressive differentiated thyroid carcinoma.
Bockisch, A; Nagarajah, J; Rosenbaum-Krumme, SJ, 2012
)
2.28
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly attenuated cardiac lipid peroxidation, oxidative injury and myocardial fibrosis in diabetic nephropathic rats. "( Beneficial effects of pioglitazone against cardiovascular injury are enhanced by combination with aliskiren in a rat model of diabetic nephropathy.
Asker, ME; Elrashidy, RA; Mohamed, HE, 2012
)
2.14
"Pioglitazone treatment appears to be associated with a significantly increased risk of bladder cancer in patients with diabetes."( Increased risk of bladder cancer with pioglitazone therapy in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis.
Lu, Y; Shen, Z; Xu, C; Zhong, S; Zhu, Z, 2012
)
2.09
"A pioglitazone-treated group and normal saline-treated group served as positive and negative controls."( Therapeutic effects of hydrogen saturated saline on rat diabetic model and insulin resistant model via reduction of oxidative stress.
Huang, Q; Kang, ZM; Wang, QJ; Xu, MJ; Zha, XJ; Zou, DJ, 2012
)
0.94
"Pioglitazone treatment resulted in the phenotypic polarization of microglial cells from a proinflammatory M1 state, into an anti-inflammatory M2 state that was associated with enhanced phagocytosis of deposited forms of amyloid."( Mechanisms underlying the rapid peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ-mediated amyloid clearance and reversal of cognitive deficits in a murine model of Alzheimer's disease.
Karlo, JC; Landreth, GE; Mandrekar-Colucci, S, 2012
)
1.1
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly increased fasting levels of serum-free carnitine, propionyl carnitine, and total carnitine."( Free carnitine and acylcarnitines in obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and effects of pioglitazone treatment.
Berge, RK; Bjørndal, B; Bohov, P; Gaster, M; Glintborg, D; Nygård, O; Seifert, R; Svardal, A; Vigerust, NF, 2012
)
1.32
"Pioglitazone treatment reduces the inflammatory state but may decrease bone mineral density (BMD)."( Plasma osteoprotegerin is associated with testosterone levels but unaffected by pioglitazone treatment in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Andersen, M; Glintborg, D; Hermann, AP; Rasmussen, LM,
)
1.08
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly decreased inflammatory markers, insulin sensitivity, and BMD without affecting OPG levels."( Plasma osteoprotegerin is associated with testosterone levels but unaffected by pioglitazone treatment in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Andersen, M; Glintborg, D; Hermann, AP; Rasmussen, LM,
)
1.08
"Pioglitazone-treated patients were found to have statistically significantly larger decreases in mean CRP levels (-0.4 mg/dL) compared to those treated with metformin (-0.2 mg/dL) (P=0.04), as well as greater reductions in levels of mean fasting plasma glucose (-27 vs."( Effect of pioglitazone versus metformin on cardiovascular risk markers in type 2 diabetes.
Ceriello, A; De Berardis, G; Evangelista, V; Genovese, S; Mannucci, E; Nicolucci, A; Pellegrini, F; Totani, L, 2013
)
1.51
"Pioglitazone treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes reduces insulin resistance and improves lipid profiles."( Effects of pioglitazone in nondiabetic patients with arterial hypertension: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Badenhoop, K; Füllert, S; Haak, E; Konrad, T; Lübben, G; Rau, H; Schneider, F; Usadel, KH, 2002
)
1.43
"Pioglitazone treatment showed no effect on plasma glucose levels in the control group."( Protective effect of pioglitazone against multiple low-dose streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats.
Anjaneyulu, M; Ramarao, P, 2003
)
1.36
"Pioglitazone treatment in type 2 diabetes 1) decreases hepatic fat content and improves insulin-mediated suppression of EGP and 2) augments splanchnic and peripheral tissue glucose uptake."( Pioglitazone reduces hepatic fat content and augments splanchnic glucose uptake in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Bajaj, M; Cersosimo, E; DeFronzo, RA; Glass, L; Hardies, LJ; Miyazaki, Y; Pratipanawatr, T; Pratipanawatr, W; Suraamornkul, S, 2003
)
2.48
"Pioglitazone treatment alone had no effects on these parameters of beta cell function in control MIN6 cells, although pioglitazone synergistically augmented the inhibitory effect of PPAR-gamma on proinsulin biosynthesis and insulin release under the condition of PPAR-gamma overexpression."( PPAR-gamma overexpression suppresses glucose-induced proinsulin biosynthesis and insulin release synergistically with pioglitazone in MIN6 cells.
Ishida, H; Ito, E; Kikuta, T; Nagamatsu, S; Nakamichi, Y; Nishiwaki, C; Ohara-Imaizumi, M, 2003
)
1.25
"The pioglitazone treatment significantly reduced hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and HbA(1c) levels and increased plasma adiponectin concentrations relative to the control group (P < 0.01). "( Antiatherogenic effect of pioglitazone in type 2 diabetic patients irrespective of the responsiveness to its antidiabetic effect.
Kono, S; Kuzuya, H; Nakao, K; Ogawa, Y; Satoh, N; Shimatsu, A; Sugawara, A; Sugiyama, H; Tagami, T; Uesugi, H; Usui, T; Yamada, K, 2003
)
1.18
"Pioglitazone treatment enlarged subcutaneous adiposity in high-fat-fed rats."( Differential influences of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors gamma and -alpha on food intake and energy homeostasis.
Jensen, PB; Larsen, LK; Larsen, PJ; Sørensen, RV; Vrang, N; Wassermann, K; Wulff, EM, 2003
)
1.04
"Pioglitazone treatment also improves insulin sensitivity and lowers WHR, but this is due to a selective increase in lower body fat."( Effects of pioglitazone versus diet and exercise on metabolic health and fat distribution in upper body obesity.
Jensen, MD; Shadid, S, 2003
)
1.43
"Pioglitazone treatment during 4 weeks decreased the catalase activity in relation to the control diabetic animals."( Effect of the new thiazolidinedione-pioglitazone on the development of oxidative stress in liver and kidney of diabetic rabbits.
Gumieniczek, A, 2003
)
1.32
"Pioglitazone treatment increased PPARgamma expression and activity in OP rats, suggesting a possible direct ligand-related effect of pioglitazone."( Pioglitazone prevents hypertension and reduces oxidative stress in diet-induced obesity.
Dobrian, AD; Khraibi, AA; Prewitt, RL; Schriver, SD, 2004
)
2.49
"Pioglitazone treatment in the OLETF rats improved the DTE (51.6 +/- 1.7 ms, P < 0.05), and the fenofibrate treatment also improved the DTE (61.4 +/- 4.3 ms, P < 0.05) and E/A ratio (1.57 +/- 0.05, P < 0.05) compared to the untreated OLETF rats."( Left-ventricular diastolic dysfunction may be prevented by chronic treatment with PPAR-alpha or -gamma agonists in a type 2 diabetic animal model.
Cha, BS; Choi, D; Chung, N; Kang, SM; Kim, SK; Lee, HC; Lee, KE; Lee, YJ; Lim, SK; Zhao, ZS,
)
0.85
"With pioglitazone treatment, E(2) responses to r-hFSH remained unchanged during low-dose insulin infusion, whereas a highly significant (P < 0.02) increased response was noted with the high-dose hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp."( Enhanced granulosa cell responsiveness to follicle-stimulating hormone during insulin infusion in women with polycystic ovary syndrome treated with pioglitazone.
Chang, RJ; Coffler, MS; Dahan, MH; Malcom, PJ; Patel, K; Yoo, RY, 2003
)
0.97
"Pioglitazone-treated animals showed a significant increase in GIR, reaching a similar level as the control group."( The effect of nitric oxide synthase inhibitor on improved insulin action by pioglitazone in high-fructose-fed rats.
Han, YQ; Koshinaka, K; Ohsawa, I; Oshida, Y; Sato, Y, 2004
)
1.27
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly reduced the insulin response to OGTT and improved the insulin sensitivity indices (P < 0.01 and P = 0.03 respectively). "( Effect of pioglitazone treatment on the adrenal androgen response to corticotrophin in obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Apa, R; Costantini, B; Giuliani, M; Guido, M; Lanzone, A; Romualdi, D; Suriano, R, 2004
)
2.17
"Pioglitazone treatment before ischemia attenuated lung ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. "( Protective effects of preischemic treatment with pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma ligand, on lung ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats.
Ito, K; Kato, D; Kitamura, N; Naito, Y; Shimada, J; Takagi, T; Toda, S; Yoshikawa, T, 2004
)
2.02
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly decreased AIP from baseline in each of the study groups."( Pioglitazone reduces atherogenic index of plasma in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Glazer, NB; Johns, D; Tan, MH, 2004
)
2.49
"Pioglitazone treatment increased the expression of genes involved in glycerol-3-phosphate synthesis. "( The effect of pioglitazone on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma target genes related to lipid storage in vivo.
Bogacka, I; Bray, GA; Smith, SR; Xie, H, 2004
)
2.13
"Pioglitazone treatment was discontinued because of edema in 29 of the 309 evaluable patients (9.4%)."( Substitution of pioglitazone for troglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Bakst, G; Busch, RS; Hamilton, RA; Kane, MP,
)
1.2
"Pioglitazone treatment, which can attenuate the decrease of glomerular MMP-2 and the increase of C-IV degradation, has curative effects on diabetic nephropathy."( Effects of pioglitazone on expressions of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 in kidneys of diabetic rats.
Cai, WM; Dong, FQ; Li, H; Li, Q; Ruan, Y; Tao, J; Zhang, Z; Zheng, FP, 2004
)
1.43
"Pioglitazone treatment slightly normalised glucose and insulin levels, with a slight reduction in mPai-1 gene expression."( Night-time restricted feeding normalises clock genes and Pai-1 gene expression in the db/db mouse liver.
Akiyama, M; Kudo, T; Kuriyama, K; Moriya, T; Shibata, S; Sudo, M, 2004
)
1.04
"Pioglitazone treatment might be considered as a choice for similar cases of diabetes secondary to acromegaly."( A case of secondary diabetes mellitus with acromegaly improved by pioglitazone.
Aiba, N; Arakawa, Y; Kamoshida, S; Kanou, M; Komine, F; Nabe, K; Nakamura, S; Nirei, K; Okubo, H; Otsuka, M; Sawada, S; Tamura, K; Uchiyama, T; Watanabe, A, 2004
)
2
"Pioglitazone treatment resulted in a decrease in hemoglobin A(1c) level by 0.96 +/- 1.1% vs 0.11 +/- 0.8% in the placebo group (P < .005). "( Effect of pioglitazone on body composition and energy expenditure: a randomized controlled trial.
Bray, GA; De Jonge, L; Li, Y; Smith, SR; Volaufova, J; Xie, H, 2005
)
2.17
"With pioglitazone treatment, there was a 65% increase in insulin sensitivity along with a 34% decrease in IMCL (both P < or = 0.002)."( Pioglitazone improves insulin sensitivity through reduction in muscle lipid and redistribution of lipid into adipose tissue.
Di Gregorio, GB; Elbein, SC; Kern, PA; Lu, T; Miles, LM; Rasouli, N; Raue, U, 2005
)
2.23
"Pioglitazone treatment extended survival by 13%, and it reduced gliosis as assessed by immunohistochemical staining for CD-40 and GFAP."( Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist extends survival in transgenic mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Beal, MF; Calingasan, NY; Chen, J; Kiaei, M; Kipiani, K, 2005
)
1.05
"Pioglitazone treatment reduced blood pressure without having any significant effect on blood glucose level and body weight of STZ-diabetic rats. "( Pioglitazone, a PPARgamma agonist, restores endothelial function in aorta of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.
Balaraman, R; Majithiya, JB; Paramar, AN, 2005
)
3.21
"Pioglitazone treatment for 8 weeks affected GSH-Px activity in diabetic liver (261.5+/-7.3 mU/mg protein)."( Effects of pioglitazone on hyperglycemia-induced alterations in antioxidative system in tissues of alloxan-treated diabetic animals.
Gumieniczek, A, 2005
)
1.44
"Pioglitazone (20 mg/kg) treatment significantly decreased serum insulin, triglyceride and free fatty acid levels, and elevated high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels."( Pioglitazone can ameliorate insulin resistance in low-dose streptozotocin and high sucrose-fat diet induced obese rats.
Chen, YT; Ding, SY; Liu, Q; Shen, ZF; Sun, SJ; Xie, MZ, 2005
)
2.49
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly increased mitochondrial copy number and expression of factors involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma coactivator-1alpha and mitochondrial transcription factor A."( Pioglitazone induces mitochondrial biogenesis in human subcutaneous adipose tissue in vivo.
Bogacka, I; Bray, GA; Smith, SR; Xie, H, 2005
)
2.49
"Pioglitazone treatment for 12 weeks in subjects with insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes had no demonstrable effect on coronary flow reserve despite metabolic improvements. "( Effect of a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist on myocardial blood flow in type 2 diabetes.
Bhattacharyya, T; Daher, E; DiCarli, MF; Grunberger, G; McMahon, GT; Plutzky, J, 2005
)
1.77
"Pioglitazone treatment is useful to improve insulin resistance and glucose control in DM1 patients with diabetes mellitus, especially patients with reactive hyperinsulinemia to glucose loading."( [Long-term treatment of diabetes mellitus in myotonic dystrophy with pioglitazone].
Isobe, T; Kawai, M; Ogata, K; Ogawa, M; Oya, Y; Shirafuji, T; Yamamoto, T, 2005
)
1.28
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly elevated plasma adiponectin and MMP-2 levels, and the increase in MMP-2 was positively correlated with the increase in adiponectin."( Pioglitazone improves left ventricular diastolic function in patients with essential hypertension.
Funahashi, T; Hiuge, A; Horio, T; Iwashima, Y; Kamide, K; Kawano, Y; Kihara, S; Suzuki, K; Suzuki, M; Takamisawa, I; Takiuchi, S; Yoshimasa, Y, 2005
)
2.49
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly decreased fasting insulin and homeostasis model assessment levels."( Pioglitazone treatment increases spontaneous growth hormone (GH) secretion and stimulated GH levels in polycystic ovary syndrome.
Andersen, M; Flyvbjerg, A; Frystyk, J; Glintborg, D; Hagen, C; Hermann, AP; Støving, RK; Veldhuis, JD, 2005
)
2.49
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly increased GHRH-stimulated GH levels and 24-h pulsatile GH secretion, probably directly or indirectly due to improved insulin sensitivity."( Pioglitazone treatment increases spontaneous growth hormone (GH) secretion and stimulated GH levels in polycystic ovary syndrome.
Andersen, M; Flyvbjerg, A; Frystyk, J; Glintborg, D; Hagen, C; Hermann, AP; Støving, RK; Veldhuis, JD, 2005
)
3.21
"Pioglitazone treatment had no significant effect on PE induced contraction and Ach induced relaxation in L-NAME diabetic and nondiabetic rats."( Effect of pioglitazone on L-NAME induced hypertension in diabetic rats.
Balaraman, R; Majithiya, JB; Parmar, AN; Trivedi, CJ, 2005
)
1.45
"Pioglitazone combination treatment produced significant increases from baseline for average and peak low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size at weeks 12 and 24 (p<0.0001 for each; range 0.29-0.39 nm for average and 0.36-0.55 nm for peak particle size, respectively)."( Pioglitazone plus a sulphonylurea or metformin is associated with increased lipoprotein particle size in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Johnson, T; Karunaratne, M; Khan, M; Perez, A, 2004
)
2.49
"Pioglitazone treatment reduced insulin, FFA, and C-reactive protein concentrations compared with placebo (18.3 +/- 2.4 versus 14.8 +/- 2.1 mU/L, P = 0.03; 641 +/- 46 versus 542 +/- 33 mumol/L, P = 0.04; and 3.5 +/- 0.6 mg/L versus 2.6 +/- 0.5 mg/L, P = 0.01; respectively)."( Short-term pioglitazone treatment improves vascular function irrespective of metabolic changes in patients with type 2 diabetes.
de Koning, EJ; Martens, FM; Rabelink, TJ; Visseren, FL, 2005
)
1.44
"Pioglitazone treatment of FCH patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus increases insulin sensitivity, decreases liver enzymes and improves LDL composition but has a neutral effect on total serum lipid levels. "( Effects of pioglitazone in familial combined hyperlipidaemia.
Abbink, EJ; De Graaf, J; De Haan, JH; Heerschap, A; Stalenhoef, AF; Tack, CJ, 2006
)
2.17
"Pioglitazone treatment lowered total postprandial triglyceride, as well as chylomicron- and chylomicron-remnant retinyl palmitate levels to normal."( The effect of sensitisation to insulin with pioglitazone on fasting and postprandial lipid metabolism, lipoprotein modification by lipases, and lipid transfer activities in type 2 diabetic patients.
Al Majali, K; Betteridge, DJ; Cooper, MB; Luc, G; Staels, B; Taskinen, MR, 2006
)
1.32
"Pioglitazone treatment restored MCD activity to non-diabetic level and improved the restrained fatty acid metabolism in myocardial and skeletal muscles caused by insulin-resistant diabetic status."( Tissue-specific regulation of malonyl-CoA decarboxylase activity in OLETF rats.
Ahn, CW; Cha, BS; Kim, HJ; Kim, SK; Lee, HC; Lee, YJ; Park, CW; Shim, WS; Zhao, ZS, 2006
)
1.78
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly improved endothelium-dependent dilation to bradykinin (P=0.01) without affecting the response to sodium nitroprusside (P=0.31)."( Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activation with pioglitazone improves endothelium-dependent dilation in nondiabetic patients with major cardiovascular risk factors.
Campia, U; Matuskey, LA; Panza, JA, 2006
)
1.29
"Pioglitazone treatment was introduced at various time points."( Limited therapeutic efficacy of pioglitazone on progression of hepatic fibrosis in rats.
Horsmans, Y; Leclercq, IA; Sempoux, C; Stärkel, P, 2006
)
1.34
"When pioglitazone treatment was initiated after five weeks of CCl4, no antifibrotic effect was observed."( Limited therapeutic efficacy of pioglitazone on progression of hepatic fibrosis in rats.
Horsmans, Y; Leclercq, IA; Sempoux, C; Stärkel, P, 2006
)
1.07
"In pioglitazone-treated patients, circulating adiponectin levels were significantly increased from 4 weeks after the start of treatment, and until the end of the study at 12 weeks."( Pioglitazone increases circulating adiponectin levels and subsequently reduces TNF-alpha levels in Type 2 diabetic patients: a randomized study.
Mori, M; Oh-I, S; Ohtani, KI; Okada, S; Shimizu, H; Tsuchiya, T, 2006
)
2.29
"Pioglitazone-treated allografts showed significantly reduced expression of interferon-gamma, interleukin-10, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1."( Pioglitazone prevents acute and chronic cardiac allograft rejection.
Haraguchi, G; Isobe, M; Koga, N; Kosuge, H; Maejima, Y; Suzuki, J, 2006
)
2.5
"Pioglitazone treatment can convey direct protection against cytokine (TNF-alpha)-induced endothelial dysfunction in humans with an increased cardiovascular risk due to type 2 diabetes."( TNF-alpha induces endothelial dysfunction in diabetic adults, an effect reversible by the PPAR-gamma agonist pioglitazone.
de Koning, EJ; Martens, FM; op 't Roodt, J; Rabelink, TJ; Visseren, FL, 2006
)
1.99
"Pioglitazone treatment resulted in significantly lower levels of fasting insulin and significantly higher insulin sensitivity, increased insulin-stimulated glucose oxidation, and increased insulin-stimulated inhibition of lipid oxidation."( Effect of pioglitazone on glucose metabolism and luteinizing hormone secretion in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Andersen, M; Beck-Nielsen, H; Glintborg, D; Hagen, C; Henriksen, JE; Hermann, AP; Veldhuis, JD, 2006
)
1.46
"Pioglitazone treatment can significantly attenuate the evolutionary in the early stages of experimental diabetic retinopathy. "( [Effects of pioglitazone on MKP-1 and TSP-1 expression in early stages of diabetic retinopathy induced by streptozotocin].
Kong, JX; Shen, JG; Wang, JY, 2006
)
2.16
"Pioglitazone pretreatment of diabetic islets restored their glucose sensitivity."( Pioglitazone acutely influences glucose-sensitive insulin secretion in normal and diabetic human islets.
Sjöholm, A; Zhang, F; Zhang, Q, 2006
)
2.5
"Pioglitazone treated rats had a significantly lesser degree of neointimal hyperplasia than control rats."( Long-term effects of a PPAR-gamma agonist, pioglitazone, on neointimal hyperplasia and endothelial regrowth in insulin resistant rats.
Desouza, CV; Gerety, M; Hamel, FG, 2007
)
1.32
"Pioglitazone treatment reduced the concentration of plasma free fatty acids in rats fed on either diet."( Effects of pioglitazone and high-fat diet on ceramide metabolism in rat skeletal muscles.
Baranowski, M; Górski, J; Zabielski, P; Zendzian-Piotrowska, M, 2006
)
1.45
"Pioglitazone treatment decreased muscle GLUT5 mRNA and protein by 52 and 40%, respectively, whereas placebo did not alter GLUT5 expression."( Overexpression of GLUT5 in diabetic muscle is reversed by pioglitazone.
Howell, ME; Stuart, CA; Yin, D, 2007
)
1.31
"Pioglitazone treatment markedly corrected the above abnormalities."( Mechanisms underlying the chronic pioglitazone treatment-induced improvement in the impaired endothelium-dependent relaxation seen in aortas from diabetic rats.
Kamata, K; Kobayashi, T; Matsumoto, T; Noguchi, E, 2007
)
1.34
"Pioglitazone treatment was also associated with increased cytoplasmic but reduced mitochondrial peroxide levels."( The thiazolidinedione pioglitazone alters mitochondrial function in human neuron-like cells.
Berry, D; Ghosh, S; Horwitz, G; McAllister, J; Patel, N; Rahn, D; Sadeghi, S; Swerdlow, RH; Wang, KX, 2007
)
1.38
"Pioglitazone treatment improved insulin resistance and decreased visceral fat accumulation without significant changes in plasma glucose levels, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c levels, and lipid profiles."( Reduction of neointimal hyperplasia after coronary stenting by pioglitazone in nondiabetic patients with metabolic syndrome.
Katayama, T; Kawakami, M; Kubo, N; Kuroki, M; Momomura, S; Saito, M; Tsuboi, K; Ueba, H; Yasu, T, 2007
)
1.3
"Pioglitazone treatment resulted in a significant increase in total (5.3%, p=0.02) and subcutaneous (7.1%, p=0.003) adipose tissue as well as in soleus-IMCL levels (47.4%, p=0.02) without alteration in intra-abdominal AT or IHCL."( Pioglitazone added to conventional lipid-lowering treatment in familial combined hyperlipidaemia improves parameters of metabolic control: relation to liver, muscle and regional body fat content.
Amber, V; Bell, JD; Betteridge, DJ; Fitzpatrick, J; Hamilton, G; Holvoet, P; Hughes, R; Naoumova, RP; North, C; Potter, E; Seed, M; Thomas, EL; Tosi, I, 2007
)
2.5
"Pioglitazone treatment was associated with a reduction in A1GP at 20 weeks (p<0.001) and at 52 weeks (p<0.05) as compared to baseline."( Pioglitazone has anti-inflammatory effects in patients with Type 2 diabetes.
Ebeling, P; Heliövaara, MK; Herz, M; Leinonen, E; Teppo, AM, 2007
)
2.5
"Pioglitazone treatment results in reduced A1GP concentration suggesting an anti-inflammatory effect."( Pioglitazone has anti-inflammatory effects in patients with Type 2 diabetes.
Ebeling, P; Heliövaara, MK; Herz, M; Leinonen, E; Teppo, AM, 2007
)
2.5
"Pioglitazone treatment was initiated the day after the first diethylnitrosamine injection."( The PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone inhibits early neoplastic occurrence in the rat liver.
Borbath, I; Horsmans, Y; Leclercq, I; Moulin, P; Sempoux, C, 2007
)
1.38
"More pioglitazone-treated patients experienced oedema (9.0 vs."( Effect of pioglitazone in combination with insulin therapy on glycaemic control, insulin dose requirement and lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes previously poorly controlled with combination therapy.
Berhanu, P; Perez, A; Yu, S, 2007
)
1.2
"The pioglitazone treatment significantly increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and decreased triglyceride levels and insulin resistance."( The effects of pioglitazone on cerebrovascular resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Ahn, CW; Cha, BS; Cho, MH; Kim, CS; Kim, HJ; Kim, KR; Lee, HC; Lee, KY; Lim, SK; Nam, JS; Park, JS, 2007
)
1.17
"Pioglitazone treatment also improved post-challenge insulin responses."( Effects of pioglitazone in combination with metformin or a sulfonylurea compared to a fixed-dose combination of metformin and glibenclamide in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Bellatreccia, A; Comaschi, M; Demicheli, A; Di Pietro, C; Mariz, S, 2007
)
1.45
"Pioglitazone treatment resulted in a significant improvement of FMD (4.3%+/-3.3; p=0.003), while no effect was seen under placebo medication (2.0%+/-2.7; p=0.71)."( Improved vascular function upon pioglitazone treatment in type 2 diabetes is not associated with changes in mononuclear NF-kappaB binding activity.
Bierhaus, A; Buchbinder, S; Djuric, Z; Grafe, IA; Hamann, A; Humpert, PM; Konrade, I; Morcos, M; Nawroth, PP; Reismann, P; Rudofsky, G; Tafel, J; Zorn, M, 2007
)
1.34
"Pioglitazone treatment reduced both hepatic lipid content (12.0 +/- 6.1 vs 8.4 +/- 3.7 arbitrary units [AU], P < .01) and IMCL (8.4 +/- 3.6 vs 6.3 +/- 2.4 AU/creatine, P < .01), whereas metformin reduced only IMCL (7.0 +/- 3.6 vs 5.8 +/- 2.0 AU/creatine, P < .05)."( Effects of pioglitazone and metformin on intracellular lipid content in liver and skeletal muscle of individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Fujii, M; Hirota, Y; Kasuga, M; Kawamitsu, H; Kouyama, K; Maeda, K; Ohara, T; Sugimura, K; Teranishi, T; Zenibayashi, M, 2007
)
1.45
"Pioglitazone treatment significantly inhibited hepatic I/R injury as determined by serological and histological analyses."( Importance of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma in hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice.
Akahori, T; Enomoto, K; Hamada, K; Kanehiro, H; Kuzumoto, Y; Nakajima, Y; Nakamura, S; Nomi, T; Sho, M; Suzaki, Y, 2007
)
1.06
"Pioglitazone treatment resulted in a significant reduction in fasting levels of PI and SPI compared to those of the controls. "( Reduced postprandial proinsulinaemia and 32-33 split proinsulinaemia after a mixed meal in type 2 diabetic patients following sensitization to insulin with pioglitazone.
Al Majali, K; Bailey, CJ; Betteridge, DJ; Cooper, MB, 2008
)
1.99
"Pioglitazone treatment reduced sCD36 while improving insulin-stimulated glucose metabolism, further supporting the association between sCD36 and insulin resistance in PCOS."( Soluble CD36 and risk markers of insulin resistance and atherosclerosis are elevated in polycystic ovary syndrome and significantly reduced during pioglitazone treatment.
Andersen, M; Beck-Nielsen, H; Glintborg, D; Handberg, A; Henriksen, JE; Højlund, K, 2008
)
1.27
"Pioglitazone treatment was followed by reduced BMD [geometric means (-2 to +2 sd)]: lumbar spine 1.140 (0.964-1.348) vs."( Association of pioglitazone treatment with decreased bone mineral density in obese premenopausal patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Andersen, M; Glintborg, D; Hagen, C; Heickendorff, L; Hermann, AP, 2008
)
1.42
"Pioglitazone treatment was followed by decreased lumbar and hip BMD and decreased measures of bone turnover in a premenopausal study population relatively protected from bone mineral loss."( Association of pioglitazone treatment with decreased bone mineral density in obese premenopausal patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Andersen, M; Glintborg, D; Hagen, C; Heickendorff, L; Hermann, AP, 2008
)
2.14
"Pioglitazone treatment markedly reduced urinary albumin and MCP-1 excretion, and ameliorated glomerulosclerosis."( Pioglitazone attenuates diabetic nephropathy through an anti-inflammatory mechanism in type 2 diabetic rats.
Cha, DR; Han, JY; Han, KH; Han, SY; Kang, YS; Kim, HK; Ko, GJ; Lee, MH; Song, HK, 2008
)
2.51
"Pioglitazone treatment led to improvement in levels of multiple cardiovascular risk markers, including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein A1, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglyceride, insulin, and free fatty acid."( Increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol predicts the pioglitazone-mediated reduction of carotid intima-media thickness progression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Chen, Z; D'Agostino, R; Davidson, M; Feinstein, S; Haffner, S; Kondos, GT; Mazzone, T; Meyer, PM; Perez, A, 2008
)
1.31
"Pioglitazone treatment of KK-A(y) mice for 14 days significantly reduced the accumulation of inflammatory cells in ischemic myocardium, and infarct size 3 days after reperfusion compared to vehicle treatment (p<0.05 and p<0.05, respectively)."( Pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist, attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice with metabolic disorders.
Fuchigami, S; Hayasaki, T; Honda, T; Kaikita, K; Matsukawa, M; Ogawa, H; Sakashita, N; Sugiyama, S; Takeya, M; Tsujita, K, 2008
)
2.51
"Pioglitazone treatment in non-diabetic patients with CAD was associated with a significantly better coronary endothelial function compared to placebo."( Impact of pioglitazone on coronary endothelial function in non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.
Höher, M; Hombach, V; Kestler, HA; Koenig, W; Marx, N; Nusser, T; Wöhrle, J, 2008
)
2.19
"Pioglitazone and insulin treatments, but not metformin, reduced hyperglycemia, polydipsia, and polyphagia."( Metabolic recovery of adipose tissue is associated with improvement in insulin resistance in a model of experimental diabetes.
Andreotti, S; Borges-Silva, Cd; Campana, AB; de Campos, TB; Fonseca-Alaniz, MH; Lima, FB; Machado, UF; Okamoto, M; Takada, J, 2008
)
1.07
"Pioglitazone treatment ameliorated the level of decrease in adiponectin expression and improved colonic inflammation induced by the omega-3 fat-rich diet."( Omega-3 fatty acids exacerbate DSS-induced colitis through decreased adiponectin in colonic subepithelial myofibroblasts.
Hokari, R; Itoh, K; Kawaguchi, A; Komoto, S; Kurihara, C; Matsunaga, H; Miura, S; Nagao, S; Nakamura, M; Okada, Y; Okudaira, K; Takebayashi, K; Tsuzuki, Y; Watanabe, C, 2008
)
1.07
"Pioglitazone pretreatment augmented the secretory response by isolated islets to high glucose, alpha-KIC, and tolbutamide."( Insulin secretory defect in Zucker fa/fa rats is improved by ameliorating insulin resistance.
de Souza, CJ; Meglasson, MD; Robinson, DD; Ulrich, RG; Yu, JH, 1995
)
1.01
"Pioglitazone treatment prevented the development of hypertension and reduced plasma insulin concentration by 70% and 37% in rats fed a high-fat or glucose diet, respectively (P < .05 compared with rats fed the same diet without pioglitazone)."( Pioglitazone attenuates diet-induced hypertension in rats.
DeGrange, LM; Kaufman, LN; Peterson, MM, 1995
)
2.46
"Pioglitazone treatment of diabetic animals significantly enhanced the effects of insulin to reverse elevated blood glucose."( Insulin sensitization in diabetic rat liver by an antihyperglycemic agent.
Colca, JR; Hofmann, C; Lorenz, K; Palazuk, BJ; Williams, D, 1995
)
1.01
"Pioglitazone treatment did not have any effect on intact receptor kinase."( Pioglitazone ameliorates high glucose induced desensitization of insulin receptor kinase in Rat 1 fibroblasts in culture.
Egawa, K; Iwanishi, M; Kashiwagi, A; Kikkawa, R; Maegawa, H; Shigeta, Y; Tachikawa-Ide, R; Ugi, S, 1993
)
2.45
"Pioglitazone treatment did not change insulin binding in high-fat-fed rats, but increased insulin-stimulated autophosphorylation of insulin receptors to the level of control animals."( Effect of pioglitazone on insulin receptors of skeletal muscles from high-fat-fed rats.
Iwanishi, M; Kobayashi, M, 1993
)
1.41
"Pioglitazone treatment alone did not change the kinase activity of EGF receptors."( Pioglitazone attenuates the inhibitory effect of phorbol ester on epidermal growth factor receptor autophosphorylation and tyrosine kinase activity.
Imamura, T; Kobayashi, M; Morioka, H; Sawa, T; Takada, Y; Takata, Y; Yang, GH, 1996
)
2.46
"Pioglitazone pretreatment increased (P < 0.001) in vitro insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in adipose tissue, but not in thoracic aortas of Dahl-S."( Effect of pioglitazone on vascular reactivity in vivo and in vitro.
Hoffmann, RG; Kotchen, TA; Reddy, S; Zhang, HY, 1996
)
1.42
"With pioglitazone pretreatment and submaximal insulin concentrations, DNA synthesis was significantly increased from 2.1-fold (insulin 10(-12) mol/l alone) to 3.9-fold (insulin 10(-12) mol/l + pioglitazone 10(-6) mol/l)."( Pioglitazone: in vitro effects on rat hepatoma cells and in vivo liver hypertrophy in KKAy mice.
Diani, A; Messina, JL; Murray, FT; Sangani, GA; Wachowski, MB; Weinstock, RS, 1997
)
2.19
"Pioglitazone treatment also significantly reduced the urinary excretion of catecholamines and plasma renin activity, both of which were significantly greater in sucrose-fed SHR than in control SHR."( Reduction of insulin resistance attenuates the development of hypertension in sucrose-fed SHR.
Fujita, H; Hatta, T; Itoh, H; Kawa, T; Kiyama, M; Miki, S; Moriguchi, J; Morimoto, S; Nakagawa, M; Nakamura, K; Nakata, T; Sasaki, S; Takeda, K; Uchida, A, 1997
)
1.02
"The pioglitazone treatment increased the mean glucose infusion rate (GIR) prior to OGL from 8.2 +/- 2.2 to 9.2 +/- 2.0 mg/kg.min (mean +/- SD, P = 0.003) and increased the SGU rate from 28.5 +/- 19.4 to 59.4 +/- 27.1% (P = 0.010)."( Pioglitazone enhances splanchnic glucose uptake as well as peripheral glucose uptake in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. AD-4833 Clamp-OGL Study Group.
Arisaka, T; Ikebuchi, M; Ikeda, M; Kanda, T; Kawamori, R; Kinoshita, J; Kubota, M; Matsuhisa, M; Mochizuki, K; Niwa, M; Tohdo, R; Wada, M; Yamasaki, Y, 1998
)
2.22
"In pioglitazone-treated Wistar fatty rats, UCP3 mRNA levels were significantly increased by 2.1-, 2.0-, and 1.6-fold in the epididymal WAT, retroperitoneal WAT, and BAT, respectively, as compared with those in nontreated fatty rats."( Increased adipose expression of the uncoupling protein-3 gene by thiazolidinediones in Wistar fatty rats and in cultured adipocytes.
Doi, K; Hanaoka, I; Hosoda, K; Inoue, G; Itoh, H; Matsuda, J; Nakao, K; Nishimura, H; Odaka, H; Son, C; Yamori, Y; Yoshimasa, Y, 1998
)
0.81
"Pioglitazone treatment was associated with significant weight gain (up to 4 kg over 16 weeks)."( A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of pioglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Chilcott, J; Jones, ML; Tappenden, P; Wight, JP, 2001
)
1.28
"Pioglitazone treatment also provided significant benefit with respect to plasma HDL-C and triglyceride levels."( Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes: a randomised, placebo-controlled study in patients receiving stable insulin therapy.
Einhorn, D; Glazer, NB; Hershon, K; Rosenstock, J; Yu, S, 2002
)
1.35
"Pioglitazone treatment did not change insulin binding in Wistar fatty rats but increased insulin-stimulated autophosphorylation of insulin receptors to 78% over the level in the control but not the basal state."( Pioglitazone increases insulin sensitivity by activating insulin receptor kinase.
Egawa, K; Iwanishi, M; Kobayashi, M; Shigeta, Y, 1992
)
2.45
"Pioglitazone treatment of preadipocytes enhanced the insulin- or insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-I)-regulated differentiation (monitored by the rate of lipogenesis or triglyceride accumulation), whereas treatment of the cells in the absence of insulin or IGF-I resulted in no apparent change in the cellular phenotype."( Enhancement of adipocyte differentiation by an insulin-sensitizing agent.
Clarke, SD; Kletzien, RF; Ulrich, RG, 1992
)
1
"Treatment of pioglitazone also protected the secondary structural alterations induced by glycation and inhibited the formation of protein aggregates."( Ameliorative effect of pioglitazone on glucose induced glycation of α-crystallin: Management of complications associated with diabetic retinopathy.
Ren, Z; Song, J, 2022
)
1.38
"Treatment with pioglitazone ameliorated Aβ42 deposition in the hippocampus by increasing IDE and PPARγ expression."( Pioglitazone ameliorates Aβ42 deposition in rats with diet-induced insulin resistance associated with AKT/GSK3β activation.
Cao, M; Chen, Z; Li, R; Wang, Z; Yang, S; Zhang, M, 2017
)
2.24
"Treatment of pioglitazone and berberine alone and in combination significantly ameliorate abnormal blood glucose, serum insulin, and HbA1c levels in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats."( Pioglitazone-induced bone loss in diabetic rats and its amelioration by berberine: A portrait of molecular crosstalk.
Adil, M; Kandhare, AD; Mansoori, MN; Sharma, M; Singh, D, 2017
)
2.25
"Treatment with pioglitazone reduced the density of CLS in periprostatic fat and suppressed levels of TNFα, TGFβ, and the chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)."( Pioglitazone Inhibits Periprostatic White Adipose Tissue Inflammation in Obese Mice.
Bhardwaj, P; Dannenberg, AJ; Falcone, DJ; Giri, DD; Miyazawa, M; Subbaramaiah, K; Wang, H; Zhou, XK, 2018
)
2.26
"Treatment with pioglitazone may offer a new effect on the whole vessel wall, promoting the stability of advanced atherosclerotic plaques."( Vascular dysfunction elicited by a cross talk between periaortic adipose tissue and the vascular wall is reversed by pioglitazone.
Cannizzo, B; Castro, C; Cejas, J; García, R; Quesada, I; Redondo, A, 2018
)
1.03
"Treatment with pioglitazone decreased both the plasma and hepatic apoM and S1P levels only in diet-induced obese mice."( Regulation of the metabolism of apolipoprotein M and sphingosine 1-phosphate by hepatic PPARγ activity.
Hara, M; Ikeda, H; Iso-O, N; Kurano, M; Tsukamoto, K; Yatomi, Y, 2018
)
0.82
"Treatment with pioglitazone induced HIF-1α mRNA as well as PPARγ mRNA expression in a concentration dependent manner."( Pioglitazone induces hypoxia-inducible factor 1 activation in human renal proximal tubular epithelial cell line HK-2.
Kuroda, Y; Miyazaki, M; Murata, T; Nagai, J; Urakami-Takebayashi, Y, 2018
)
2.26
"Treatment with pioglitazone, BCP, BCP + CB2R antagonist, AM630, or BCP + PPAR-γ antagonist, BADGE was started from the 9th week and continued till the 12th week."( Beta-caryophyllene protects against diet-induced dyslipidemia and vascular inflammation in rats: Involvement of CB2 and PPAR-γ receptors.
El-Fayoumi, HM; Mahmoud, MF; Youssef, DA, 2019
)
0.85
"Treatment with pioglitazone in this group was associated with a significantly lower occurrence of the outcome than SUs (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.76)."( Cardiovascular Effects of Pioglitazone or Sulfonylureas According to Pretreatment Risk: Moving Toward Personalized Care.
Bonora, E; Del Prato, S; Giorda, CB; Lucisano, G; Maggioni, AP; Masulli, M; Mocarelli, P; Nicolucci, A; Riccardi, G; Rivellese, AA; Squatrito, S; Vaccaro, O, 2019
)
1.15
"Treatment with pioglitazone reduces the expression of ER stress markers and mitochondrial fusion proteins."( Pioglitazone Improves the Function of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.
Lee, JH; Lee, SH; Yoon, YM; Yun, CW, 2019
)
2.3
"Treatment with pioglitazone significantly attenuated the prenatal VPA-induced social impairment, repetitive behavior, hyperactivity, anxiety and low exploratory activity."( Beneficial effects of pioglitazone, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist in prenatal valproic acid-induced behavioral and biochemical autistic like features in Wistar rats.
Mirza, R; Sharma, B, 2019
)
1.17
"Treatment with pioglitazone, significantly attenuated the postnatal propionic acid-induced social impairment, repetitive behavior, hyperactivity, anxiety and low exploratory activity."( A selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist benefited propionic acid induced autism-like behavioral phenotypes in rats by attenuation of neuroinflammation and oxidative stress.
Mirza, R; Sharma, B, 2019
)
0.85
"Pretreatment with pioglitazone not only decreased the expression of PAI-1 and matrix proteins (FN and collagen I), but prevented the downregulation of PPARγ in RPMCs under HG conditions."( Pioglitazone inhibits high glucose-induced synthesis of extracellular matrix by NF-κB and AP-1 pathways in rat peritoneal mesothelial cells.
Li, D; Ma, J; Su, X; Wang, L; Zhou, G, 2013
)
2.16
"Pretreatment with pioglitazone produced reduction in serum levels of blood urea nitrogen and creatinine caused by IRI. "( Pioglitazone protects against renal ischemia-reperfusion injury by enhancing antioxidant capacity.
Hu, H; Huang, X; Shi, Z; Wang, G; Xi, X; Zou, C, 2013
)
2.17
"Pretreatment with pioglitazone dose dependently attenuated gastric lesions induced by ethanol in both sham and cirrhotic rats, but this effect was more prominent in cirrhotic ones. "( Enhanced anti-ulcer effect of pioglitazone on gastric ulcers in cirrhotic rats: the role of nitric oxide and IL-1β.
Amirghofran, Z; Dehpour, AR; Heidari, R; Moezi, L; Monabati, A; Nekooeian, AA, 2013
)
1.01
"Treatment with pioglitazone (30 mg/day) plus nateglinide (PIO arm) to control for glimepiride-induced insulin secretion was compared to treatment with glimepiride (2 mg/day) plus placebo (GLI arm)."( Effects of pioglitazone versus glimepiride exposure on hepatocellular fat content in type 2 diabetes.
Anderwald, CH; Bernroider, E; Brehm, A; Krebs, M; Krssak, M; Nowotny, P; Phielix, E; Roden, M; Schmid, AI, 2013
)
1.12
"Treatment with pioglitazone increases the number of proliferating SPA in subcutaneous, but not visceral, fat, suggesting that SPA may be important in regulating systemic insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism."( Small proliferative adipocytes: identification of proliferative cells expressing adipocyte markers.
Fujioka, K; Hanamoto, T; Ikeda, T; Ishizuka, T; Kajita, K; Kajita, T; Kitada, Y; Mori, I; Morita, H; Okada, H; Taguchi, K; Uno, Y; Usui, T; Yamauchi, M, 2013
)
0.73
"Treatment with pioglitazone suppressed both whole-phase and effector-phase of EAU."( Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist pioglitazone suppresses experimental autoimmune uveitis.
Goto, H; Hattori, T; Kezuka, T; Matsuda, R; Nakagawa, H; Okunuki, Y; Tajima, K; Ueda, S; Usui, Y, 2013
)
0.98
"Pretreatment with pioglitazone dose-dependently attenuated gastric lesions induced by ethanol in both sham and cholestatic rats, but this effect was more prominent in cholestatic ones."( The increased gastroprotective effect of pioglitazone in cholestatic rats: role of nitric oxide and tumour necrosis factor alpha.
Amirghofran, Z; Dehpour, AR; Janahmadi, Z; Moezi, L; Nekooeian, AA, 2014
)
0.99
"Treatment with pioglitazone resulted in significant reductions in the levels of HbA1c, diastolic blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol and a significant increase in the levels of HDL-cholesterol. "( Effects of pioglitazone on macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high risk of stroke: the PROFIT-J study.
Kawamori, R; Kitagawa, K; Kitakaze, M; Matsuhisa, M; Matsumoto, M; Onuma, T; Watada, H; Yamasaki, Y; Yamazaki, T; Yoshii, H, 2014
)
1.15
"Treatment with pioglitazone improved heart function by decreasing the expression of AGEs and OX-62 in the rats with myocardial infarction (MI) plus diabetes."( Advanced glycation end products promote heart failure through inducing the immune maturation of dendritic cells.
Cao, W; Chen, J; Chen, X; Chen, Y; Liu, P, 2014
)
0.74
"Treatment with pioglitazone improves the irregularities of menses and hirsutism. "( Effects of the insulin sensitizer pioglitazone on menstrual irregularity, insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism in young women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Artenisio, AC; Benvenga, S; Borrielli, I; Bruno, LM; Giunta, L; La Marca, A; Pizzo, A; Stabile, G; Volpe, A, 2014
)
1.03
"Treatment with pioglitazone for 24 h significantly increased the expression of CYP11B2 and enhanced AngII-induced CYP11B2 expression."( The effect of pioglitazone on aldosterone and cortisol production in HAC15 human adrenocortical carcinoma cells.
Bollag, WB; Chen, X; Choudhary, V; Olala, L; Pan, ZQ; Seremwe, M; Tsai, YY; Xie, D, 2014
)
1.1
"Treatment with pioglitazone (PG), an activator of PPARγ, improved the viability of the cellular model of SBMA."( Pioglitazone suppresses neuronal and muscular degeneration caused by polyglutamine-expanded androgen receptors.
Adachi, H; Iida, M; Ikenaka, K; Katsuno, M; Kishida, K; Kondo, N; Miyazaki, Y; Nakatsuji, H; Sobue, G; Tohnai, G; Watanabe, H; Yamamoto, M, 2015
)
2.2
"Pretreatment with pioglitazone, as a PPARγ agonist, potentiated the anticonvulsant effects of WIN, while PPARγ antagonist inhibited these anticonvulsant effects partially."( Involvement of PPAR receptors in the anticonvulsant effects of a cannabinoid agonist, WIN 55,212-2.
Aghaei, HN; Dehpour, AR; Ebrahimi, A; Gholizadeh, R; Gooshe, M; Mousavizadeh, K; Payandemehr, B; Rahimian, R; Varastehmoradi, B, 2015
)
0.74
"Co-treatment with pioglitazone + fenofibrate had no significant effect on bone strength in comparison with OVX vehicle controls."( Effects of pioglitazone and fenofibrate co-administration on bone biomechanics and histomorphometry in ovariectomized rats.
Awori, M; Bauss, F; Bénardeau, A; Chouinard, L; Guldberg, RE; Samadfam, R; Sebokova, E; Smith, SY; Wright, MB, 2015
)
1.13
"Treatment with pioglitazone or nicorandil either alone or in combination successfully ameliorated the deleterious effects of HFD on the all previous parameters."( Ameliorative effect of nicorandil on high fat diet induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in rats.
Elshazly, SM, 2015
)
0.76
"Treatment with pioglitazone and alogliptin (19 of 43 DM subjects) improved serum haemoglobin A1c and decreased BCAA levels."( Elevation of branched-chain amino acid levels in diabetes and NAFL and changes with antidiabetic drug treatment.
Fujita, N; Hasegawa, H; Ishihara, T; Iwasa, M; Iwata, K; Kaito, M; Kobayashi, Y; Mifuji-Moroka, R; Takei, Y,
)
0.47
"Treatment with pioglitazone for 6 months, compared with placebo, significantly reduced multiple plasma ceramide concentrations: C18:0 (p = 0.001), C20:0 (p = 0.0004), C24 : 1 (p = 0.009), dihydroceramide C18 :0 (p = 0.005), dihydroceramide C24:1 (p = 0.004), lactosylceramide C16:0 (p = 0.02) and the hexosylceramides C16:0 (p = 0.0003), C18 : 0 (p = 0.00001), C22:0 (p = 0.00002) and C24:1 (p = 0.0006). "( Effect of pioglitazone on plasma ceramides in adults with metabolic syndrome.
Anuwe, E; Blankfard, MB; Gordillo, R; Hicks, J; Holland, WL; Lingvay, I; Lopez, X; Scherer, PE; Warshauer, JT, 2015
)
1.17
"Treatment with pioglitazone prevented abnormal valve calcification, but did not protect valve function."( Spontaneous Aortic Regurgitation and Valvular Cardiomyopathy in Mice.
Baumbach, GL; Brooks, RM; Chen, B; Chu, Y; Davis, MK; Doshi, H; El Accaoui, RN; Funk, ND; Hajj, GP; Hameed, T; Heistad, DD; Leinwand, LA; Lund, DD; Magida, JA; Song, LS; Weiss, RM; Zimmerman, KA, 2015
)
0.76
"Dual treatment of pioglitazone and eplerenone demonstrated synergistic effect on reducing ICAM-1 and IL-6 expression and alleviating NF-κB activation when compared with their monotherapies in TNF-α activated renal tubular cells."( Crosstalk between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ and mineralcorticoid receptor in TNF-α activated renal tubular cell.
Chen, W; Fu, C; Lu, Y; Xiao, J; Yan, Z; Ye, Z; Zhang, X; Zhang, Z, 2015
)
0.74
"Dual treatment of pioglitazone and eplerenone present better efficacy in attenuating excessive inflammatory response in activated renal tubular cells under stimulation of TNF-α than single treatment."( Crosstalk between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ and mineralcorticoid receptor in TNF-α activated renal tubular cell.
Chen, W; Fu, C; Lu, Y; Xiao, J; Yan, Z; Ye, Z; Zhang, X; Zhang, Z, 2015
)
0.74
"Treatment with pioglitazone and ceftriaxone significantly prevented these behavioral, biochemical, mitochondrial and cellular alterations in rats."( Ameliorative potential of pioglitazone and ceftriaxone alone and in combination in rat model of neuropathic pain: Targeting PPARγ and GLT-1 pathways.
Bhatnagar, A; Ekavali, E; Garg, S; Kumar, A; Pottabathini, R, 2016
)
1.07
"Treatment with pioglitazone caused an increase in body weight gain in Pemt(-/-) mice that was mainly due to increased adiposity."( Pioglitazone attenuates hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase-deficient mice.
Armstrong, EA; Gao, X; Jacobs, RL; Kassiri, Z; Lehner, R; Lingrell, S; Quiroga, AD; Takawale, A; van der Veen, JN; Vance, DE; Yager, JY, 2016
)
2.22
"Treatment with pioglitazone resulted in increased expression of PPARγ mRNA in hFOB 1.19 osteoblasts."( In Vitro Effects of Pioglitazone on the Expression of Components of Wnt Signaling Pathway and Markers of Bone Mineralization.
Avtanski, D; Babushkin, N; Hirth, Y; Poretsky, L; Seto-Young, D; Sharma, D; Sy, V, 2016
)
1.1
"Treatment with pioglitazone (5 mg/kg) reduced the infarct size and improved some ECG findings."( Cardioprotective effect of pioglitazone in diabetic and non-diabetic rats subjected to acute myocardial infarction involves suppression of AGE-RAGE axis and inhibition of apoptosis.
Farag, NE; Khodeer, DM; Moustafa, YM; Zaitone, SA, 2016
)
1.07
"The treatment of pioglitazone was associated with a reduction in ISR and TLR in T2DM patients suffering from PCI, except the incidence of MACE."( Effect of Pioglitazone in Preventing In-Stent Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis.
Chen, L; Qi, GX; Shi, LY; Tian, W; Zhao, SJ; Zhong, ZS, 2016
)
1.18
"Treatment with pioglitazone improved serum lipid profile of non-diabetic hyperlipidaemic rats equivalent to that of gemfibrozil."( Pioglitazone improves serum lipid profile in diet induced hyperlipidaemic non diabetic rats.
Arain, AQ; Chiragh, S; Hussian, M, 2016
)
2.23
"Treatment with pioglitazone and rosiglitazone both were associated with reduction in fasting and postprandial blood sugar levels but more with pioglitazone. "( A Study of Effects of Pioglitazone and Rosiglitazone on Various Parameters in Patients of Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus with Special Reference to Lipid Profile.
Sharma, SK; Verma, SH, 2016
)
1.1
"Treatment with pioglitazone, orlistat and metformin reduced the overall IR by 41.0 +/- 4.1%, 19.7 +/- 6.4% and 16.1 +/- 6.8% (P = 0.005, P = 0.013, P = 0.17, respectively) and IR variability by 28.5 +/- 18.0%, 41.8 +/- 11.6% and 23.7 +/- 17.0 (P = 0.20, P = 0.015 and P = 0.28, respectively). "( Effect of metformin, orlistat and pioglitazone treatment on mean insulin resistance and its biological variability in polycystic ovary syndrome.
Atkin, SL; Cho, LW; Coady, AM; Keevil, BG; Kilpatrick, ES, 2009
)
0.98
"Treatment with pioglitazone improved insulin-stimulated glucose metabolism and plasma adiponectin, and reduced fasting serum insulin (all P<0.05)."( Pioglitazone enhances mitochondrial biogenesis and ribosomal protein biosynthesis in skeletal muscle in polycystic ovary syndrome.
Beck-Nielsen, H; Glintborg, D; Højlund, K; Jensen, T; Knudsen, S; Kruse, TA; Skov, V; Tan, Q, 2008
)
2.13
"Treatment with pioglitazone increased adiponectin levels from an average of 10.6 to 21.1 microg/ml (P=0.001) and improved ED-FMD from 4.45 to 8.43% (P=0.001)."( Pioglitazone increases adiponectin levels in nondiabetic patients with coronary artery disease.
Coppola, JT; Mailloux, LM; Mindrescu, C; Patel, SR; Staniloae, CS, 2008
)
2.14
"Treatment with pioglitazone increased plasma adiponectin levels and improved ED-FMD in patients with stable CAD and no evidence of diabetes or insulin resistance."( Pioglitazone increases adiponectin levels in nondiabetic patients with coronary artery disease.
Coppola, JT; Mailloux, LM; Mindrescu, C; Patel, SR; Staniloae, CS, 2008
)
2.14
"Treatment with pioglitazone (15 or 30mg/day, n=31) or placebo (n=30) was randomly assigned and initiated within 5 days after the onset of ACS in 61 patients with type 2 DM and echolucent carotid plaques. "( Rapid improvement of carotid plaque echogenicity within 1 month of pioglitazone treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Fujioka, D; Hirano, M; Kawabata, K; Kitta, Y; Kobayashi, T; Kodama, Y; Kugiyama, K; Nakamura, K; Nakamura, T; Obata, JE; Saito, Y; Sano, K; Yano, T, 2009
)
0.94
"Treatment with pioglitazone, associated with metformin, showed a reduction of IL-6 monocyte production after their in vitro activation with LPS."( Pioglitazone reduces monocyte activation in type 2 diabetes.
Biasucci, LM; Buffon, A; Crea, F; Di Stasio, E; Ghirlanda, G; Giubilato, S; Liuzzo, G; Pitocco, D; Zaccardi, F, 2009
)
2.14
"Treatment with pioglitazone significantly reduced eNOS and iNOS by improving adipocytokine levels."( The effect of pioglitazone on nitric oxide synthase in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Itoh, S; Katagiri, T; Kobayashi, Y; Kodama, Y; Konno, N; Nishio, K; Satoh, R; Shigemitsu, M, 2008
)
1.05
"Treatment with pioglitazone was associated with significant improvements of lipid and glycemic parameters that are linked to insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk in patients with T2DM in their routine clinical care. "( [Six-month effectiveness and tolerability of pioglitazone in combination with sulfonylureas or metformin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus].
Mesa, J; Polavieja, P; Reviriego, J; Rodríguez, A, 2008
)
0.96
"Treatment of pioglitazone reduced neointimal hyperplasia in patients with STEMI treated with primary stent implantation without placing the patient at increased risk of complications. "( Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary stent implantation.
Domae, H; Kaneda, H; Matsumi, J; Minami, Y; Miyashita, Y; Mizuno, S; Saito, S; Shiono, T; Sugitatsu, K; Takahashi, S; Taketani, Y, 2009
)
1.03
"Treatment with pioglitazone produced improvement in several parameters, such as systolic blood pressure and lipid levels, including a 14% increase in HDL cholesterol, and reduced CIMT progression, compared with glimepiride."( The clinical implications of the CHICAGO study for the management of cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Davidson, M; Mazzone, T; Polonsky, T, 2009
)
0.69
"Treatment with pioglitazone significantly improved insulin sensitivity in CAH patients (glucose infusion rate (GIR) from 28.5+/-11.6 to 38.9+/-11.0 micromol/kg per min, P=0.000, GIR in controls 46.2+/-23.4 micromol/kg per min, P<0.05 versus CAH)."( Pioglitazone improves insulin resistance and decreases blood pressure in adult patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia.
Hermus, AR; Kroese, JM; Mooij, CF; Tack, CJ; van der Graaf, M, 2009
)
2.14
"Treatment with pioglitazone improves insulin sensitivity and decreases blood pressure in CAH patients."( Pioglitazone improves insulin resistance and decreases blood pressure in adult patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia.
Hermus, AR; Kroese, JM; Mooij, CF; Tack, CJ; van der Graaf, M, 2009
)
2.14
"Treatment with pioglitazone at concentrations ranging from 1 to 10 mum significantly decreased corneal fibroblast migration, as determined by scrape-wound assay, inhibited corneal fibroblast-induced collagen lattice contraction, and reduced MMP-2 and MMP-9 secretion into the supernatant of cell cultures in a dose-dependent manner. "( Antifibrotic effect by activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma in corneal fibroblasts.
Chen, J; Chen, M; Ma, R; Pan, H; Xu, J, 2009
)
0.71
"Co-treatment of pioglitazone with the PPARgamma antagonist GW9662 did not significantly reduce these effects, suggesting a PPARgamma-independent mechanism."( The thiazolidinedione pioglitazone increases cholesterol biosynthetic gene expression in primary cortical neurons by a PPARgamma-independent mechanism.
Bousgouni, V; Cocks, G; Graham, SJ; Lovestone, S; Richardson, J; Virley, D; Wilde, JI, 2010
)
1.01
"Treatment with pioglitazone may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in this patient group."( Effect of pioglitazone on endothelial function in impaired glucose tolerance.
Hamilton, PK; Lockhart, CJ; Loughrey, CM; McVeigh, GE; Quinn, CE, 2010
)
1.1
"Treatment with pioglitazone decreased the level of amylase activity, proinflammatory factors IL-6 and TNF-α, ameliorated pancreatic histological score, and upregulated the expression of PPARγ mRNA. "( Pioglitazone: a promising therapeutic tool in sodium taurocholate-induced severe acute pancreatitis.
Chen, LQ; Jiang, JP; Wang, J; Xu, K; Xu, P, 2011
)
2.16
"Treatment with Pioglitazone prevented the increase in the number of activated microglia and no difference was observed between sham and Pioglitazone-treated animals."( Pioglitazone attenuates mitochondrial dysfunction, cognitive impairment, cortical tissue loss, and inflammation following traumatic brain injury.
Bing, G; Gao, J; Liu, M; Pauly, JR; Readnower, R; Sauerbeck, A; Sullivan, PG, 2011
)
2.15
"Treatment with pioglitazone as compared with placebo was associated with significantly reduced levels of fasting glucose (a decrease of 11.7 mg per deciliter vs."( Pioglitazone for diabetes prevention in impaired glucose tolerance.
Banerji, M; Bray, GA; Buchanan, TA; Clement, SC; DeFronzo, RA; Henry, RR; Hodis, HN; Kitabchi, AE; Mack, WJ; Mudaliar, S; Musi, N; Ratner, RE; Reaven, PD; Schwenke, DC; Stentz, FB; Tripathy, D; Williams, K, 2011
)
2.15
"Pretreatment of pioglitazone not only prevented the down-regulation of PPARγ, but inhibited VSMC proliferation and prevented S-phase entry of cell via a G0-G1 block in the presence of AGEs."( Inhibition of reactive oxygen species/extracellular signal-regulated kinases pathway by pioglitazone attenuates advanced glycation end products-induced proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells in rats.
Gong, K; Liu, N; Qin, J; Yuan, X; Zhang, Z; Zhao, P, 2011
)
0.93
"Treatment with pioglitazone in T2DM was shown to improve insulin resistance and blood glucose levels without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia. "( Review of approved pioglitazone combinations for type 2 diabetes.
Forst, T; Hanefeld, M; Pfützner, A, 2011
)
1.05
"Treatment with pioglitazone resulted in significant decreases in elevated proinsulin levels in type 2 diabetes patients. "( Elevated intact proinsulin levels are indicative of Beta-cell dysfunction, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular risk: impact of the antidiabetic agent pioglitazone.
Forst, T; Pfützner, A, 2011
)
0.92
"Pretreatment with pioglitazone significantly increased the CTE in vitro (1.9% ± 0.2% n = 47 vs."( Pretreatment of human mesenchymal stem cells with pioglitazone improved efficiency of cardiomyogenic transdifferentiation and cardiac function.
Hida, N; Miyoshi, S; Nishiyama, N; Ogawa, S; Segawa, K; Shinmura, D; Togashi, I; Tsuji, H; Tsukada, Y; Tsuruta, H; Umezawa, A, 2011
)
0.95
"Treatment with pioglitazone dramatically inhibited AS progression, stabilized plaque and modulated the Treg/Teff imbalance (up-regulated Treg/down-regulated Teff) in uremic mice, without influencing serum lipid profiles and blood glucose."( Antiatherogenic effect of pioglitazone on uremic apolipoprotein E knockout mice by modulation of the balance of regulatory and effector T cells.
Chen, T; Kishimoto, C; Liang, X; Liu, W; Liu, Y; Shen, Y; Tian, Y; Wang, L; Wu, Y; Xiao, Y; Yin, A; Yuan, Z; Zhao, Y, 2011
)
1.01
"Treatment with pioglitazone markedly inhibited intimal hyperplasia of carotid interposition-reversed jugular vein grafts in the pioglitazone group (0.54 ± 0.04 mm(2)) vs control (0.93 ± 0.04 mm(2); n = 7; P < .01). "( Pioglitazone prevents intimal hyperplasia in experimental rabbit vein grafts.
Komori, K; Maehara, Y; Morisaki, K; Murohara, T; Ouchi, N; Shibata, R; Takahashi, N, 2011
)
2.16
"Treatment with pioglitazone significantly inhibited the increases in the serum interleukin-6 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) levels after CLP and lowered the mRNA expressions of proinflammatory cytokines, interleukin-6, and MCP-1 in omental tissue after CLP."( Effects of pioglitazone on survival and omental adipocyte function in mice with sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture.
Kutsukake, M; Matsuda, A; Matsutani, T; Sasajima, K; Tamura, K; Tsujimura, Y; Uchida, E, 2011
)
1.1
"Pretreatment with pioglitazone significantly lowered the apoptosis rate of the cardiomyocytes with hypoxia/reoxygenation injury to (8.32∓0.89)%, and this effect was antagonized by GW9662, a specific blocker of peroxisome proliferators activated receptors γ (PPARγ)."( [Effect of pioglitazone on hypoxia/reoxygenation injury and protein kinase C expression in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes].
Luo, LM; Wang, H; Ye, P; Zhang, JY; Zhu, QW, 2011
)
1.08
"Treatment with pioglitazone before and during treatment with peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin improved several indices of glycemic control in patients with chronic hepatitis C and insulin resistance, but did not improve virologic response rates compared with peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin alone."( Chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients with insulin resistance treated with pioglitazone and peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin.
Hamzeh, FM; Han, J; Harrison, SA; Pandya, PK; Sheikh, MY; Vierling, JM, 2012
)
0.96
"Treatment with pioglitazone for 12 weeks improves left ventricular diastolic and systolic function in people with type 2 diabetes."( A randomized placebo controlled double blind crossover study of pioglitazone on left ventricular diastolic function in type 2 diabetes.
Chaturvedi, N; Coady, E; Hughes, AD; Khir, A; March, K; Park, C; Thom, SA, 2013
)
0.98
"Treatment with pioglitazone or telmisartan demonstrated a significant improvement in the reperfusion-induced renal injury in comparison with diabetic I/R group, without difference between the two treated groups."( Renoprotective activity of telmisartan versus pioglitazone on ischemia/reperfusion induced renal damage in diabetic rats.
Tawfik, MK, 2012
)
0.98
"Treatment of pioglitazone lowered blood glucose level and prevented delay of MNCV in SDT fatty rats."( Diabetic peripheral neuropathy in Spontaneously Diabetic Torii-Lepr(fa) (SDT fatty) rats.
Kemmochi, Y; Matsushita, M; Mera, Y; Ohta, T; Sasase, T; Sato, E; Tadaki, H; Tomimoto, D; Yamaguchi, T, 2012
)
0.73
"2) Treatment with pioglitazone significantly improved the memory performance in morphine-treated mice in both tests."( Involvement of nitric oxide in pioglitazone memory improvement in morphine-induced memory impaired mice.
Almasi-Nasrabadi, M; Babaei, R; Dehpour, AR; Javadi-Paydar, M; Mahdavian, S; Norouzi, A; Sharifian, M, 2012
)
0.99
"Treatment with pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist, resulted in attenuation of pressure overload-induced LA fibrosis."( Novel strategy to prevent atrial fibrosis and fibrillation.
Fukunaga, N; Hara, M; Kume, O; Saikawa, T; Takahashi, N; Teshima, Y; Wakisaka, O, 2012
)
0.72
"Treatment with pioglitazone is able to redistribute free fatty acids from insulin-sensitive tissues, diminish demand for carnitine, and influence the overall carnitine turnover."( Free carnitine and acylcarnitines in obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and effects of pioglitazone treatment.
Berge, RK; Bjørndal, B; Bohov, P; Gaster, M; Glintborg, D; Nygård, O; Seifert, R; Svardal, A; Vigerust, NF, 2012
)
0.94
"Treatment with pioglitazone orMNCs, demonstrated a significant improvement in the STZ-induced renal functional and structural changes in comparison with diabetic control group. "( Effect of mononuclear cells versus pioglitazone on streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy in rats.
Abd El-All, HS; Ewais, MM; Masoad, RE; Tawfik, MK, 2012
)
1.01
"Treatment with pioglitazone 30 or 45 mg QD for 16 weeks reduced mean HbA(1c) by 0.8% and 0.9% from baseline, respectively (both P < 0.001 vs baseline and placebo)."( A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of the effects of pioglitazone on glycemic control and dyslipidemia in oral antihyperglycemic medication-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Duran, S; Escobar-Jiménez, F; Godin, C; Grossman, LD; Hardin, PA; Hawkins, F; Herz, M; Johns, D; Konkoy, CS; Lochnan, H; Reviriego, J; Tan, MH, 2003
)
0.88
"Treatment with pioglitazone (20mg/kg bw/day for 3 weeks) did not significantly increase either P-AMPK or P-ACC (which varies inversely with ACC activity) in control rats."( Pioglitazone treatment activates AMP-activated protein kinase in rat liver and adipose tissue in vivo.
Assifi, MM; Avilucea, PR; Kraegen, EW; Ruderman, NB; Saha, AK; Ye, JM, 2004
)
2.11
"Treatment with pioglitazone thus protects against beta-cell damage and would be useful for restoration of insulin secretory capacity in obese diabetes individuals."( Pioglitazone improves insulin secretory capacity and prevents the loss of beta-cell mass in obese diabetic db/db mice: Possible protection of beta cells from oxidative stress.
Ishida, H; Itagaki, E; Katahira, H; Katsuta, H; Maruyama, M; Nagamatsu, S; Nakamichi, Y; Ozawa, S; Takizawa, M; Tanaka, T; Yamaguchi, S; Yoshimoto, K, 2004
)
2.11
"Treatment with pioglitazone for 8 weeks lowered glycated albumin level (27.1 +/- 1.2 to 23.8 +/- 1.4%, p < 0.05), and inverse relationship between changes in glycated albumin and plasma adiponectin concentration before treatment was revealed (r = -0.66, p < 0.05). "( Lower plasma adiponectin concentration predicts the efficacy of pioglitazone in diabetic patients.
Hiramatsu, S; Karashima, T; Tajiri, Y, 2004
)
0.92
"Treatment with pioglitazone increased body weight, and this is associated with upregulation of some, but not all, genes previously demonstrated as "TZD responsive" in subcutaneous fat. "( The effect of pioglitazone on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma target genes related to lipid storage in vivo.
Bogacka, I; Bray, GA; Smith, SR; Xie, H, 2004
)
1.04
"Treatment with pioglitazone was also associated with higher ovulation rates (P < 0.02)."( Effect of the insulin sensitizer pioglitazone on insulin resistance, hyperandrogenism, and ovulatory dysfunction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Brettenthaler, N; De Geyter, C; Huber, PR; Keller, U, 2004
)
0.94
"Treatment with pioglitazone (10 and 30 mg/kg p.o.) once daily for 2 weeks significantly diminished the elevated basal plasma insulin and TG levels in HFD-fed rats."( Reversal of glucose intolerance by by pioglitazone in high fat diet-fed rats.
Kaul, CL; Patole, PS; Ramarao, P; Srinivasan, K, 2004
)
0.93
"Pretreatment with pioglitazone (10 mg/kg, 4 times at 10-min intervals) significantly protected the endotoxin-induced decreases in the systemic clearance of antipyrine and protein levels of CYP3A2, but not CYP2C11, with no biochemical and histopathological changes in the liver."( Effect of pioglitazone on endotoxin-induced decreases in hepatic drug-metabolizing enzyme activity and expression of CYP3A2 and CYP2C11.
Hasegawa, T; Iwase, M; Kanazawa, H; Kitaichi, K; Nadai, M; Suzuki, R; Takagi, K; Tomyo, N; Ueyama, J, 2004
)
1.05
"Treatment with pioglitazone or metformin was associated with the occurrence of pregnancy (n = 5 and n = 3, respectively)."( Responses of serum androgen and insulin resistance to metformin and pioglitazone in obese, insulin-resistant women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Aguayo, P; Arteaga-Troncoso, G; Crespo, G; Hernández, L; Luna, S; Ortega-González, C; Parra, A, 2005
)
0.9
"Cotreatment of pioglitazone (PIO) or allopurinol (ALL) with L-NAME restored plasma adiponectin concentration and fat adiponectin mRNA levels to control levels."( Hypoadiponectinemia is caused by chronic blockade of nitric oxide synthesis in rats.
Hattori, S; Hattori, Y; Kasai, K, 2005
)
0.67
"Treatment with pioglitazone stimulated the expression of genes in the fatty acid oxidation pathway, including carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1, malonyl-CoA decarboxylase, and medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase."( Pioglitazone induces mitochondrial biogenesis in human subcutaneous adipose tissue in vivo.
Bogacka, I; Bray, GA; Smith, SR; Xie, H, 2005
)
2.11
"Treatment with pioglitazone decreased the neointimal content of lipid in 20-week-old mice from 50 +/- 6% to 30 +/- 7%, p=0.005 and decreased the cellularity reflected by the multisection cross-sectional areas of lesions comprising cells in atheroma from 24 +/- 1% to 19 +/- 3%, p=0.018."( Attenuation of accumulation of neointimal lipid by pioglitazone in mice genetically deficient in insulin receptor substrate-2 and apolipoprotein E.
Clough, MH; Schneider, DJ; Sobel, BE; Taatjes, DJ; Wadsworth, MP; White, MF, 2005
)
0.92
"Treatment with pioglitazone as monotherapy or combination therapy led to sustained, positive effects on important components of metabolic syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes, independent of effects on blood glucose control and, as such, could be translated to potential for reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease."( Effect of pioglitazone on metabolic syndrome risk factors: results of double-blind, multicenter, randomized clinical trials.
Iyer, S; Khan, M; Rajagopalan, R, 2005
)
1.08
"Pre-treatment with pioglitazone dose-dependently attenuated gastric lesions induced by 100% ethanol and WRS; the dose reducing these lesions by 50% (ID50) being 10 mg/kg and 7 mg/kg, respectively."( Agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-gamma): a new compound with potent gastroprotective and ulcer healing properties.
Brzozowski, T; Burnat, G; Cieszkowski, J; Hahn, EG; Konturek, PC; Konturek, S; Kwiecień, SN; Pajdo, R; Pawlik, WW; Targosz, A, 2005
)
0.65
"The treatment with pioglitazone in type 2 diabetic patients significantly reduced leptin. "( A randomized comparison of pioglitazone to inhibit restenosis after coronary stenting in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Fukui, T; Itoh, S; Katagiri, T; Kawamura, K; Konno, N; Kusuyama, T; Nishio, K; Sakurai, M; Shigemitsu, M, 2006
)
0.96
"Treatment with pioglitazone significantly lowered plasma insulin (-22.9%; P<0.001), improved QUICKI insulin sensitivity index (3.7%; P<0.001), increased HDL cholesterol (8.2%; P<0.001), and reduced triglycerides (-15.1%; P=0.003), free fatty acids (-14%; P=0.005), and C-reactive protein (-28.6%; P=0.001)."( Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activation with pioglitazone improves endothelium-dependent dilation in nondiabetic patients with major cardiovascular risk factors.
Campia, U; Matuskey, LA; Panza, JA, 2006
)
0.91
"Treatment with pioglitazone significantly suppressed graft expression of interferon-gamma and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1."( Pioglitazone prevents acute and chronic cardiac allograft rejection.
Haraguchi, G; Isobe, M; Koga, N; Kosuge, H; Maejima, Y; Suzuki, J, 2006
)
2.12
"Treatment with pioglitazone for 4 weeks completely blocked TNF-alpha-induced impairment of endothelial-dependent FBF compared with placebo."( TNF-alpha induces endothelial dysfunction in diabetic adults, an effect reversible by the PPAR-gamma agonist pioglitazone.
de Koning, EJ; Martens, FM; op 't Roodt, J; Rabelink, TJ; Visseren, FL, 2006
)
0.89
"Treatment with pioglitazone significantly lowered triglyceride, very low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels, and increased high-density lipoprotein levels and insulin sensitivity (all P < .05)."( Pioglitazone increases the numbers and improves the functional capacity of endothelial progenitor cells in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Cherng, WJ; Hsieh, IC; Hung, A; Kuo, LT; Ting, MK; Verma, S; Wang, CH; Wang, SY; Yang, NI, 2006
)
2.12
"Treatment with pioglitazone and rosiglitazone significantly decreased the AT(1)R specific binding in HFD fed rats."( PPAR gamma agonists partially restores hyperglycemia induced aggravation of vascular dysfunction to angiotensin II in thoracic aorta isolated from rats with insulin resistance.
Gaikwad, AB; Ramarao, P; Viswanad, B, 2007
)
0.68
"Treatment with pioglitazone for 72 hours increased the number of EPC-CFUs, DiI-ac-LDL(+)/lectin(+), CD31(+) and KDR(+) EPCs at 1 microM but not at 10 microM."( Biphasic effect of pioglitazone on isolated human endothelial progenitor cells: involvement of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma and transforming growth factor-beta1.
Gümbel, D; Hristov, M; Redondo, S; Tejerina, T; Weber, C, 2007
)
1.01
"Mice treated with pioglitazone had attenuated gelatinase activity."( PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone reduces [corrected] neuronal cell damage after transient global cerebral ischemia through matrix metalloproteinase inhibition.
Jang, YH; Lee, H; Lee, KJ; Lee, SR; Yoo, HS, 2008
)
1
"Treatment with pioglitazone significantly decreased the levels of HbA1c, FPG, the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index, RLP-C, PAI-1, TNF- alpha , and hs-CRP, but not the level, IRI, lipids, or leptin. "( Pioglitazone reduces atherogenic outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients.
Hirata, A; Igarashi, M; Jimbu, Y; Tominaga, M; Yamaguchi, H, 2008
)
2.14
"Pretreatment with pioglitazone completely prevented these effects of MPTP."( The PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone is effective in the MPTP mouse model of Parkinson's disease through inhibition of monoamine oxidase B.
Chapman, H; Crook, B; Hows, ME; Medhurst, AD; Quinn, LP; Upton, N; Vidgeon-Hart, M; Virley, DJ, 2008
)
0.98
"Treatment with pioglitazone decreased retroperitoneal fat, but as reported previously, it increased the mass of the epididymal fat pad."( Malonyl coenzyme A and adiposity in the Dahl salt-sensitive rat: effects of pioglitazone.
Colca, JR; Corkey, BE; Cunningham, BA; Holbert, RI; Kurowski, TG; Ruderman, NB; Saha, AK, 1996
)
0.86
"Treatment with pioglitazone significantly improved glucose and lipid metabolism."( Antihypertensive and vasculo- and renoprotective effects of pioglitazone in genetically obese diabetic rats.
Aikawa, E; Demura, H; Demura, R; Imaki, T; Naruse, K; Naruse, M; Nishikawa, M; Seki, T; Tanabe, A; Yoshimoto, T, 1997
)
0.88
"Treatment with pioglitazone reduced the amount of anti-alpha-smooth muscle actin antibody-staining cells."( Pioglitazone reduces smooth muscle cell density of rat carotid arterial intima induced by balloon catheterization.
Igarashi, M; Ishibashi, N; Mori, S; Saito, Y; Takahashi, K; Takeda, Y; Tominaga, M, 1997
)
2.08
"Treatment with pioglitazone was associated with a reduction in mean TG of 55.17 mg/dL, a reduction in TC of 8.45 mg/dL, an increase in HDL-C of 2.65 mg/dL, and a reduction in LDL-C of 5.05 mg/dL. "( Effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone on blood lipid levels and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective review of randomly selected medical records.
Boyle, PJ; King, AB; Lau, H; Magar, R; Marchetti, A; Martin, J; Olansky, L, 2002
)
1.06
"Treatment with pioglitazone was associated with greater beneficial effects on blood lipid levels than treatment with rosiglitazone, whereas glycemic control was equivalent between the 2 treatments."( Effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone on blood lipid levels and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective review of randomly selected medical records.
Boyle, PJ; King, AB; Lau, H; Magar, R; Marchetti, A; Martin, J; Olansky, L, 2002
)
1.06
"Treatment with pioglitazone improved survival of Pkd1(-/-) embryos and ameliorated the cardiac defects and the degree of renal cystogenesis."( Pioglitazone improves the phenotype and molecular defects of a targeted Pkd1 mutant.
Aiba, A; Harris, PC; Higashihara, E; Horie, S; Katsuki, M; Kitamura, T; Kurabayashi, M; Muto, S; Nagai, R; Nakamura, K; Nakao, K; Saito, Y; Tomita, K, 2002
)
2.1
"Treatment with pioglitazone alone is sufficient for correction of glucose transport in hyperinsulinemic insulin-resistant animals, but hypoinsulinemic animals require insulin therapy along with pioglitazone treatment for similar corrections."( Glucose transport deficiency in diabetic animals is corrected by treatment with the oral antihyperglycemic agent pioglitazone.
Colca, JR; Hofmann, C; Lorenz, K, 1991
)
0.83
"Treatment with pioglitazone restored the responses of HGP and PGU to infused insulin in the fatty rats, but did not produce any changes in the lean rats."( Effects of pioglitazone on hepatic and peripheral insulin resistance in Wistar fatty rats.
Ikeda, H; Shimura, Y; Sugiyama, Y, 1990
)
1.01

Toxicity

Combined treatment with pioglitazone-metformin can effectively reduce liver fat content and gamma-GT level in newly diagnosed diabetic patients. Adverse events do not increase compared with the control group, showing good safety and tolerance.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" In these trials, adverse events were recorded, as were details of laboratory blood values, urine analysis, vital signs and electrocardiograms."( Safety profile of pioglitazone.
Belcher, G; Hanefeld, M, 2001
)
0.64
"The first thiazolidinedione derivative drug for diabetes, troglitazone, was found to cause fatal hepatotoxicity, although it was judged as safe during the clinical trial."( [Evaluation of thiazolidinedione derivative drugs for safety].
Iwata, M; Kobayashi, M, 2001
)
0.31
" The incidence of adverse events was similar in all treatment groups, although the incidences of weight increase, hypoglycaemia and oedema were higher among patients receiving insulin plus pioglitazone."( Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes: a randomised, placebo-controlled study in patients receiving stable insulin therapy.
Einhorn, D; Glazer, NB; Hershon, K; Rosenstock, J; Yu, S, 2002
)
0.82
" The profile and frequency of adverse events were similar in all treatment groups."( Metabolic efficacy and safety of once-daily pioglitazone monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Göke, B; Scherbaum, WA, 2002
)
0.58
" This is further supported by experimental data that demonstrate that troglitazone, alone among the thiazolidinediones, is toxic in hepatocyte cell culture."( Hepatotoxicity of the thiazolidinediones.
Chandramouli, J; Tolman, KG, 2003
)
0.32
"To determine whether thiazolidinediones cause significant changes in intravascular volume, anemia, or chronic heart failure; to determine which thiazolidinedione, rosiglitazone or pioglitazone, has a greater propensity to cause these adverse effects; and to evaluate thiazolidinedione efficacy in patients with diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal disease who require hemodialysis."( Thiazolidinedione safety and efficacy in ambulatory patients receiving hemodialysis.
Allcock, NM; Manley, HJ, 2003
)
0.51
"Thiazolidinedione therapy is safe and effective for ambulatory patients receiving hemodialysis."( Thiazolidinedione safety and efficacy in ambulatory patients receiving hemodialysis.
Allcock, NM; Manley, HJ, 2003
)
0.32
" However, the use of these drugs in routine clinical practice was associated with more frequent adverse events than previously reported in clinical trials."( Effectiveness and side effects of thiazolidinediones for type 2 diabetes: real-life experience from a tertiary hospital.
Colman, PG; Hussein, Z; Nankervis, AJ; Proietto, J; Wentworth, JM, 2004
)
0.32
" The overall frequency of adverse events was similar between treatment groups, but adverse event profiles were different between treatment groups."( Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone versus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a double-blind, randomized trial.
Brunetti, P; Charbonnel, B; Hanefeld, M; Matthews, DR; Schernthaner, G, 2004
)
0.63
" Fasting and mean 7- and 8-point blood glucose profiles, blood lipid levels, plasminogen activator inhibitor levels, adverse events, and hypoglycemia frequency were also compared."( Efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 30 combined with pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes poorly controlled on glibenclamide (glyburide) monotherapy or combination therapy: an 18-week, randomized, open-label study.
Chow, CC; Filipczak, R; Joshi, P; Lertoft, B; Rastam, J; Raz, I; Shaban, J; Stranks, S, 2005
)
0.57
" These significant levels were achieved within 8 weeks and all patients tolerated the drug well with no reported case of serious adverse events including hypoglycaemia."( Evaluation of efficacy and safety of fixed dose combination of glimepiride 2 mg pluspioglitazone 15 mg plus metformin SR 500 mg in the management of patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus.
Chopra, D; Kinagi, SB; Langade, DG; Meshram, DM; Morye, V; Naikwadi, AA, 2005
)
0.55
"This analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of pioglitazone (PIO), both as monotherapy and as part of combination therapy, on glycemic and lipid parameters and adverse events in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes."( The effect of pioglitazone on glycemic and lipid parameters and adverse events in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a post hoc analysis of four randomized trials.
Abbadessa, M; Rajagopalan, R; Xu, Y, 2006
)
0.94
" The rate of deaths was <2% in all the treatment groups; no adverse event associated with death was considered related to study medication."( The effect of pioglitazone on glycemic and lipid parameters and adverse events in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a post hoc analysis of four randomized trials.
Abbadessa, M; Rajagopalan, R; Xu, Y, 2006
)
0.69
" Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy or adverse events occurred more frequently with glyburide (20."( Long-term safety of pioglitazone versus glyburide in patients with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Jain, R; Kupfer, S; Osei, K; Perez, AT; Zhang, J, 2006
)
0.66
"With long-term treatment, both glyburide and pioglitazone resulted in comparable glycemic control; however, pioglitazone was associated with less hypoglycemia and fewer withdrawals due to lack of efficacy or adverse events."( Long-term safety of pioglitazone versus glyburide in patients with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Jain, R; Kupfer, S; Osei, K; Perez, AT; Zhang, J, 2006
)
0.92
" Genes that are differentially expressed between the more toxic troglitazone/ciglitazone group and the less toxic rosiglitazone/pioglitazone group are involved in necrotic, apoptotic, and cell proliferative pathways."( Differences in hepatotoxicity and gene expression profiles by anti-diabetic PPAR gamma agonists on rat primary hepatocytes and human HepG2 cells.
Blann, E; Dial, S; Dragan, YP; Guo, L; Muskhelishvili, L; Schroth, G; Shi, L; Sun, Y; Zhang, L, 2006
)
0.54
" Baseline patient characteristics, changes in serum hemoglobin A1c (A1c) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), other treatments for diabetes mellitus, and hepatobiliary adverse reactions were examined."( Hepatic safety profile and glycemic control of pioglitazone in more than 20,000 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: postmarketing surveillance study in Japan.
Akanuma, Y; Kadowaki, T; Kawamori, R; Onji, M; Seino, Y, 2007
)
0.6
" No adverse events including death, emergency bypass surgery, and reinfarction, occurred in any patients in the hospital."( Efficacy and safety of low-dose pioglitazone after primary coronary angioplasty with the use of bare metal stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction and with type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance.
Echizen, T; Hanada, H; Higuma, T; Horiuchi, D; Katoh, C; Okumura, K; Osanai, T; Sasaki, S; Sutoh, N; Yokota, T; Yokoyama, J, 2007
)
0.62
" No serious adverse effects such as hypoglycemia, liver impairment or rhabdomyolysis were observed in any of the patients."( Combination therapy of pioglitazone with voglibose improves glycemic control safely and rapidly in Japanese type 2-diabetic patients on hemodialysis.
Abe, M; Kaizu, K; Kikuchi, F; Matsumoto, K, 2007
)
0.65
"Pioglitazone was safe and effective as a treatment for diabetics on dialysis therapy."( Combination therapy of pioglitazone with voglibose improves glycemic control safely and rapidly in Japanese type 2-diabetic patients on hemodialysis.
Abe, M; Kaizu, K; Kikuchi, F; Matsumoto, K, 2007
)
2.09
" All of this has left diabetes care in some disarray, with weak evidence for adverse cardiovascular effects driving the reduced use of rosiglitazone, an agent that has important sustained effects on glycaemic control."( The cardiovascular safety of rosiglitazone.
Ajjan, RA; Grant, PJ, 2008
)
0.35
" Information on demographics, the use of pioglitazone, clinical event data, events suspected as adverse drug reactions, reasons for stopping the drug and cause of death (if appropriate) were collected using questionnaires posted to GPs at least 8 months after the date of first prescription for each patient."( Monitoring the safety of pioglitazone : results of a prescription-event monitoring study of 12,772 patients in England.
Kasliwal, R; Shakir, SA; Wilton, LV, 2008
)
0.92
" 'Malaise/lassitude' and 'nausea/vomiting' were the most frequently reported suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with pioglitazone."( Monitoring the safety of pioglitazone : results of a prescription-event monitoring study of 12,772 patients in England.
Kasliwal, R; Shakir, SA; Wilton, LV, 2008
)
0.85
" Overall, combination therapy and monotherapy were equally well tolerated and the incidence of adverse effects 'possibly' related to therapy was 15."( Efficacy and safety of therapy with metformin plus pioglitazone in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.
Kaku, K, 2009
)
0.6
" Overall, safety and tolerability was predictable, and adverse events were not treatment limiting."( Safety and tolerability of pioglitazone in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes: an overview of data from PROactive.
Bhattacharya, M; Dormandy, J; van Troostenburg de Bruyn, AR, 2009
)
0.65
" Adverse events to pioglitazone of potential severity are listed in the 'special warnings and special precautions for use' section of the pioglitazone summary of product characteristics (SPC), with recommendations for monitoring and management."( Risk management and outcomes of adverse events to pioglitazone in primary care in the UK: an observational study.
Fogg, C; Kasliwal, R; Shakir, SA, 2009
)
0.93
"An observational study of risk management and event outcomes for the adverse events of cardiac failure, fluid retention/oedema, weight gain, anaemia and abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) was performed."( Risk management and outcomes of adverse events to pioglitazone in primary care in the UK: an observational study.
Fogg, C; Kasliwal, R; Shakir, SA, 2009
)
0.61
"Timely drug withdrawal and/or interventions such as corrective treatment or referral to a specialist can lead to successful resolution of class-effect adverse events of pioglitazone."( Risk management and outcomes of adverse events to pioglitazone in primary care in the UK: an observational study.
Fogg, C; Kasliwal, R; Shakir, SA, 2009
)
0.8
" The majority of the adverse events were mild to moderate except for 1 possibly unrelated episode of acute myocardial infarction in a 49-year-old woman in the acitretin plus placebo group."( Efficacy and safety of combination Acitretin and Pioglitazone therapy in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Dogra, S; Kaur, I; Malhotra, S; Mittal, R; Pandhi, P, 2009
)
0.61
"Pioglitazone has a potential beneficial antipsoriatic effect and may provide a convenient, efficacious, and relatively safe option to combine with acitretin, although further studies are needed."( Efficacy and safety of combination Acitretin and Pioglitazone therapy in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Dogra, S; Kaur, I; Malhotra, S; Mittal, R; Pandhi, P, 2009
)
2.05
" The incidences of overall adverse events and hypoglycemia were similar across treatment groups, but cardiac events occurred more often with active treatment than placebo."( Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin added to pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Fleck, PR; Mekki, Q; Pratley, RE; Reusch, JE; Wilson, CA, 2009
)
0.58
" DPP-4 inhibitors are safe and tolerable with no increased risk of adverse events compared to placebo and have a low risk of hypoglycaemia."( Clinical results of treating type 2 diabetic patients with sitagliptin, vildagliptin or saxagliptin--diabetes control and potential adverse events.
Ahrén, B, 2009
)
0.35
" The pioglitazone/metformin FDC was well tolerated with no unexpected findings in adverse events of special interest, including hypoglycemia, bone fractures, peripheral edema, and cardiac failure."( Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone/metformin fixed-dose combination therapy compared with pioglitazone and metformin monotherapy in treating patients with T2DM.
Jacks, R; Perez, A; Spanheimer, R; Zhao, Z, 2009
)
1.18
" The FDC therapy was well tolerated, with reduced or similar adverse event rates compared with each individual monotherapy."( Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone/metformin fixed-dose combination therapy compared with pioglitazone and metformin monotherapy in treating patients with T2DM.
Jacks, R; Perez, A; Spanheimer, R; Zhao, Z, 2009
)
0.66
"The main adverse effects reported with pioglitazone are those common to the TZD class: weight gain, pedal edema, bone loss and precipitation of congestive heart failure in at-risk individuals, without any increase in CVD/all-cause mortality."( Pioglitazone: side effect and safety profile.
Mudaliar, S; Shah, P, 2010
)
2.07
" No serious adverse effects such as hypoglycemia, liver impairment, or heart failure were observed in any of the patients."( Clinical effectiveness and safety evaluation of long-term pioglitazone treatment for erythropoietin responsiveness and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients on hemodialysis.
Abe, M; Maruyama, N; Maruyama, T; Matsumoto, K; Okada, K; Soma, M, 2010
)
0.6
" An understanding of structure-activity relationships (SARs) of chemicals can make a significant contribution to the identification of potential toxic effects early in the drug development process and aid in avoiding such problems."( Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
Fisk, L; Greene, N; Naven, RT; Note, RR; Patel, ML; Pelletier, DJ, 2010
)
0.36
" Severe adverse events were uncommon in all 16 trials."( The efficacy and safety of insulin-sensitizing drugs in HIV-associated lipodystrophy syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Larson, RJ; Sheth, SH, 2010
)
0.36
" The most frequent adverse events with exenatide and sitagliptin were nausea (n=38, 24%, and n=16, 10%, respectively) and diarrhoea (n=29, 18%, and n=16, 10%, respectively); upper-respiratory-tract infection (n=17, 10%) and peripheral oedema (n=13, 8%) were the most frequent events with pioglitazone."( Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial.
Bergenstal, RM; Macconell, L; Malloy, J; Malone, J; Porter, LE; Walsh, B; Wilhelm, K; Wysham, C; Yan, P, 2010
)
0.77
" Twenty-five of 29 subjects completed the study; no withdrawals were attributable to adverse effects."( A randomized pilot clinical trial of the safety of pioglitazone in treatment of patients with Alzheimer disease.
Fritsch, T; Geldmacher, DS; Landreth, G; McClendon, MJ, 2011
)
0.62
"The primary outcome was frequency of reported adverse effects (AEs)."( A randomized pilot clinical trial of the safety of pioglitazone in treatment of patients with Alzheimer disease.
Fritsch, T; Geldmacher, DS; Landreth, G; McClendon, MJ, 2011
)
0.62
" There were no serious or unanticipated adverse events or clinical laboratory changes attributable to pioglitazone over a long-term exposure in nondiabetic patients with AD."( A randomized pilot clinical trial of the safety of pioglitazone in treatment of patients with Alzheimer disease.
Fritsch, T; Geldmacher, DS; Landreth, G; McClendon, MJ, 2011
)
0.84
" Several studies have shown the adverse effect of weight gain and edema with rosiglitazone."( Adverse effect of pioglitazone in military personnel and their families: a preliminary report.
Benjasuratwong, Y; Patarakitvanit, S; Satyapan, N; Temboonkiat, S; Vudhironarit, T, 2009
)
0.69
"The authors prospectively recorded the adverse events in 40 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who underwent administration with pioglitazone 15 mg once daily between June 2005 to May 2007."( Adverse effect of pioglitazone in military personnel and their families: a preliminary report.
Benjasuratwong, Y; Patarakitvanit, S; Satyapan, N; Temboonkiat, S; Vudhironarit, T, 2009
)
0.89
" Given that T2DM is a lifetime disease, there is a need for assurance that new drugs are both safe and effective."( The safety of thiazolidinediones.
Tolman, KG, 2011
)
0.37
" The proportion of patients that experienced at least one adverse event was similar for both groups."( Efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with linagliptin and pioglitazone in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Dugi, KA; Espadero, RM; Gomis, R; Jones, R; Woerle, HJ, 2011
)
0.6
" Exenatide once-weekly was generally well tolerated and adverse events were predominantly mild or moderate in intensity."( DURATION-2: efficacy and safety of switching from maximum daily sitagliptin or pioglitazone to once-weekly exenatide.
Bergenstal, R; Malloy, J; Malone, J; Taylor, K; Walsh, B; Wysham, C; Yan, P, 2011
)
0.6
"To analyze the association between pioglitazone use and bladder cancer through a spontaneous adverse event reporting system for medications."( Assessing the association of pioglitazone use and bladder cancer through drug adverse event reporting.
Marchesini, G; Motola, D; Piccinni, C; Poluzzi, E, 2011
)
0.94
" Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) between 2004 and 2009 and analyzed by the reporting odds ratio (ROR)."( Assessing the association of pioglitazone use and bladder cancer through drug adverse event reporting.
Marchesini, G; Motola, D; Piccinni, C; Poluzzi, E, 2011
)
0.66
" Adverse event frequency was similar between groups."( Safety and efficacy of saxagliptin added to thiazolidinedione over 76 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Allen, E; Chen, R; Frederich, R; Hollander, PL; Li, J, 2011
)
0.37
" A numerically higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events and a significantly lower incidence of oedema were observed with SITA/MET vs."( Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin and the fixed-dose combination of sitagliptin and metformin vs. pioglitazone in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.
Engel, SS; Goldstein, BJ; Kaufman, KD; Lee, MA; Pérez-Monteverde, A; Seck, T; Sisk, CM; Williams-Herman, DE; Xu, L, 2011
)
0.59
" Prolonged combined use of CC/PIO did not increase adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with candesartan cilexetil and pioglitazone hydrochloride in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Enya, K; Kaku, K; Sugiura, K; Totsuka, N, 2011
)
0.6
" In conclusion, PIO and OLM combination can primarily be stated as safe in terms of present toxicity and pharmacokinetics findings."( Development of safety profile evaluating pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicity of a combination of pioglitazone and olmesartan medoxomil in Wistar albino rats.
Nandi, U; Pal, TK; Sengupta, P, 2012
)
0.59
" Common adverse events were as follows: EQW, nausea (11."( Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus metformin, pioglitazone, and sitagliptin used as monotherapy in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-4): a 26-week double-blind study.
Boardman, MK; Chan, M; Cuddihy, RM; González, JG; Hanefeld, M; Kumar, A; Russell-Jones, D; Wolka, AM, 2012
)
0.62
" They provide similar effects on glycemic control, as well as a range of similar adverse effects, such as weight gain, fluid retention, and increased risk of hearth failure, which seem to be PPARγ mediated."( Update on cardiovascular safety of PPARgamma agonists and relevance to medicinal chemistry and clinical pharmacology.
Ciudin, A; Hernandez, C; Simó, R, 2012
)
0.38
": The aim of the study was to verify if the analysis of a large spontaneous reporting database could generate early signals on these adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with TZDs."( Cardiovascular, ocular and bone adverse reactions associated with thiazolidinediones: a disproportionality analysis of the US FDA adverse event reporting system database.
Biagi, C; Marchesini, G; Marra, A; Motola, D; Piccinni, C; Poluzzi, E; Raschi, E, 2012
)
0.38
": A case/non-case study, restricted to antidiabetic drugs, was performed on spontaneous reports of ADRs (2005-2008) in the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS)."( Cardiovascular, ocular and bone adverse reactions associated with thiazolidinediones: a disproportionality analysis of the US FDA adverse event reporting system database.
Biagi, C; Marchesini, G; Marra, A; Motola, D; Piccinni, C; Poluzzi, E; Raschi, E, 2012
)
0.38
" Adverse events were generally mild to moderate; the most frequent adverse events with taspoglutide 10 mg, taspoglutide 20 mg, and placebo were nausea (35, 44, and 10%), vomiting (21, 24, and 2%), and injection site reactions (24, 24, and 5%)."( Efficacy and safety of taspoglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin plus pioglitazone over 24 weeks: T-Emerge 3 trial.
Balena, R; Henry, RR; Kanitra, L; Mudaliar, S; Woloschak, M, 2012
)
0.59
" The primary endpoint during the long-term extension phase was adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to metformin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label, long-term extension study.
Hirayama, M; Hiroi, S; Kaku, K; Miyata, Y; Seino, Y, 2012
)
0.38
" Incidences of adverse effects were comparable between groups, with no increases in hypoglycaemia."( Efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to metformin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label, long-term extension study.
Hirayama, M; Hiroi, S; Kaku, K; Miyata, Y; Seino, Y, 2012
)
0.38
"5 and 25 mg once daily was safe and effective when added to metformin (500 or 750 mg/day) in Japanese patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on metformin alone."( Efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to metformin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label, long-term extension study.
Hirayama, M; Hiroi, S; Kaku, K; Miyata, Y; Seino, Y, 2012
)
0.38
" The adverse event (AE) profile and effects on glycemic control have not been assessed for the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide once weekly in combination with a thiazolidinedione (TZD) with or without metformin."( Safety of exenatide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with a thiazolidinedione alone or in combination with metformin for 2 years.
Boardman, MK; Haber, H; Liutkus, JF; Norwood, P; Pintilei, E; Trautmann, ME, 2012
)
0.38
" The incidences of reported adverse events were generally similar between the treatment groups."( Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to ongoing metformin and pioglitazone combination therapy in a randomized, placebo-controlled, 26-week trial in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Fonseca, V; Goldstein, BJ; Golm, GT; Johnson-Levonas, AO; Kaufman, KD; Morgan, JD; Shentu, Y; Staels, B; Steinberg, H,
)
0.37
"1%) had five treatment-related adverse events, and 10 patients in group B (32."( A multicenter, phase III evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a new fixed-dose pioglitazone/glimepiride combination tablet in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.
Hirayama, M; Hiroi, S; Kaku, K; Kawakami, K; Kuriyama, K; Matsuno, K; Sugiura, K, 2013
)
0.61
" No episodes of worsening of control of diabetes were anticipated, nor were episodes of decreased efficacy or adverse effects as a result of automatically switching patients from rosiglitazone to pioglitazone at the time of prescription filling."( Drug utilization, safety and clinical use of Actos and Avandia.
Marks, DH, 2013
)
0.58
" Overall, lixisenatide once daily was well tolerated, with a similar proportion of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs between groups (lixisenatide: 72."( Efficacy and safety of lixisenatide once daily versus placebo in type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled on pioglitazone (GetGoal-P).
Aronson, R; Goldenberg, R; Guo, H; Muehlen-Bartmer, I; Niemoeller, E; Pinget, M, 2013
)
0.6
" Overall adverse events (AEs) were similar in both groups."( Efficacy and safety of adding pioglitazone or sitagliptin to patients with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled with metformin and a sulfonylurea.
Chen, WC; Chien, KL; Leung, CH; Liu, SC; Wang, CH,
)
0.42
" Combination therapy was generally well tolerated; adverse events (AEs) of hypoglycaemia were reported with similar incidence (7."( Efficacy and safety of initial combination treatment with sitagliptin and pioglitazone--a factorial study.
Chou, MZ; Fonseca, VA; Goldstein, BJ; Golm, GT; Henry, RR; Kaufman, KD; Langdon, RB; Staels, B; Steinberg, H; Teng, R, 2014
)
0.63
" Overall adverse event (AE) incidence over 52 weeks was 69."( Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin over 52 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes on background metformin and pioglitazone.
Forst, T; Goldenberg, R; Guthrie, R; Meininger, G; Stein, P; Vijapurkar, U; Yee, J, 2014
)
0.61
" The most common gastrointestinal adverse events for dulaglutide were nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea."( Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide added onto pioglitazone and metformin versus exenatide in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-1).
Arakaki, R; Atisso, C; Blevins, T; Colon, G; Garcia, P; Kuhstoss, D; Lakshmanan, M; Wysham, C, 2014
)
0.66
"Cisplatin is a chemotherapeutic agent, which is used in the treatment of various solid organ cancers, and its main dose limiting side effect of cisplatin is nephrotoxicity."( Effect of creatine and pioglitazone on Hk-2 cell line cisplatin nephrotoxicity.
Bedir, A; Genc, G; Kilinc, V; Ozkaya, O, 2014
)
0.71
" There were no serious drug-related adverse events, and the majority of adverse events were mild or moderate."( Efficacy and safety of colesevelam in combination with pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Baz-Hecht, M; Chou, HS; Ford, DM; Rosenstock, J; Tao, B; Truitt, KE, 2014
)
0.65
"To show that albiglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, is an effective and generally safe treatment to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus whose hyperglycaemia is inadequately controlled with pioglitazone (with or without metformin)."( Efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist albiglutide (HARMONY 1 trial): 52-week primary endpoint results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus not controlled
Bode, BW; Cirkel, DT; Perkins, CM; Perry, CR; Reinhardt, RR; Reusch, J; Stewart, MW; Ye, J, 2014
)
0.58
" With few exceptions, the results of safety assessments were similar between the groups, and most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate."( Efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist albiglutide (HARMONY 1 trial): 52-week primary endpoint results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus not controlled
Bode, BW; Cirkel, DT; Perkins, CM; Perry, CR; Reinhardt, RR; Reusch, J; Stewart, MW; Ye, J, 2014
)
0.4
" In case of hepato-toxicity by non-chromane glitazone and their metabolite such as M-3, RM-3, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone; PASS suggest that these chemicals are not apoptic agonist but they are the substrate for CYP enzyme (Phase-I Oxidative Enzyme) and Phase-II conjugating enzymes; interfering with bile acid metabolism rendering bile acid more toxic (cholestasis)."( Structural insight of glitazone for hepato-toxicity: Resolving mystery by PASS.
Dhangar, K; Jagtap, R; Karpoormath, R; Noolvi, M; Patel, H; Rane, RA; Shaikh, MS; Sonawane, Y; Surana, S; Thapliyal, N, 2015
)
0.63
" Overall, all treatments were well tolerated and no new adverse events or tolerability issues were observed for IDegLira."( One-year efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of a 26-week extension to a 26-week main trial.
Bode, BW; Buse, JB; Gough, SC; Linjawi, S; Reiter, PD; Rodbard, HW; Woo, VC; Zacho, M, 2015
)
0.42
" Adverse drug reactions were present in 24% of subjects, most frequently gastrointestinal disorders (11."( ROOTS: A multicenter study in Belgium to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of liraglutide (Victoza®) in type 2 diabetic patients.
Buysschaert, M; D'Hooge, D; Preumont, V,
)
0.13
" The overall incidence rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar among the treatment groups."( Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone added to alogliptin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, comparative study.
Igeta, M; Kaku, K; Katou, M; Ohira, T; Sano, H, 2015
)
0.73
"Our aim is to investigate the usefulness of metric indices in post-marketing safety evaluations by estimating number needed to harm (NNH) values for cardiovascular (CV) adverse outcomes for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone."( Number needed to harm in the post-marketing safety evaluation: results for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone.
Alves, C; Batel-Marques, F; Mendes, D, 2015
)
0.82
" NNHs [with 95% confidence intervals (CI)] per year were estimated for CV adverse events."( Number needed to harm in the post-marketing safety evaluation: results for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone.
Alves, C; Batel-Marques, F; Mendes, D, 2015
)
0.64
" The secondary outcome measures include acne scores, prevalence of dysglycaemia, BMI, lipid profile, total testosterone level, and adverse events."( The effectiveness and safety of treatments used for polycystic ovarian syndrome management in adolescents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol.
Al Khalifah, RA; Bassilious, E; Dennis, B; Flórez, ID; Neupane, B; Thabane, L, 2015
)
0.42
"Nephrotoxicity is a major side effect for the antineoplastic drug cisplatin."( Additive Renoprotection by Pioglitazone and Fenofibrate against Inflammatory, Oxidative and Apoptotic Manifestations of Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity: Modulation by PPARs.
El-Mas, MM; Helmy, MM; Helmy, MW, 2015
)
0.71
" The percentage of subjects who experienced all adverse events including hypoglycemia with alogliptin were comparable to those with placebo."( [Efficacy and safety of alogliptin in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial in mainland China].
Bu, R; Gu, W; Han, P; Ji, Q; Jiang, Z; Lei, M; Li, C; Li, L; Li, W; Li, X; Li, Z; Liu, J; Liu, X; Liu, Y; Liu, Z; Lu, J; Lyu, X; Pan, C; Peng, Y; Qu, S; Shi, B; Song, Q; Xu, X; Xue, Y; Yan, L; Yang, J; Zeng, J; Zheng, B, 2015
)
0.42
" A similar percentage of patients experienced drug-related, treatment-emergent adverse events in the alogliptin and placebo arms."( Efficacy and safety of alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A multicentre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled Phase 3 study in mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong.
Chan, J; Han, P; Hsieh, AT; Ji, Q; Li, C; Li, W; Lu, J; Pan, C; Yang, J; Zeng, J, 2017
)
0.46
" Outcomes included the changes in hemoglobin A1c, fasting plasma glucose, bodyweight and treatment-emergent adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of ipragliflozin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes stratified by body mass index: A subgroup analysis of five randomized clinical trials.
Kashiwagi, A; Kawamuki, K; Kazuta, K; Kosakai, Y; Nakamura, I; Satomi, H; Takahashi, H; Ueyama, E; Yoshida, S, 2016
)
0.43
" The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between the ipragliflozin and placebo groups in all patients combined and in the four body mass index categories."( Efficacy and safety of ipragliflozin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes stratified by body mass index: A subgroup analysis of five randomized clinical trials.
Kashiwagi, A; Kawamuki, K; Kazuta, K; Kosakai, Y; Nakamura, I; Satomi, H; Takahashi, H; Ueyama, E; Yoshida, S, 2016
)
0.43
" The proportion of patients reporting ≥1 adverse event was similar across treatment groups, but events consistent with genital infection were more common in patients treated with empagliflozin 10 mg (3."( Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes from Asian countries: pooled data from four phase III trials.
Crowe, S; Hach, T; Lee, J; Nishimura, R; Salsali, A; Woerle, HJ; Yoon, KH, 2016
)
0.43
"Many adverse drug reactions are caused by the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-dependent activation of drugs into reactive metabolites."( Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
Jones, LH; Nadanaciva, S; Rana, P; Will, Y, 2016
)
0.43
" This preliminary investigation concludes that the combination of pioglitazone and telmisartan can primarily be stated as safe in animals, even at the dose level which is several folds higher than the intended human dose."( Safety profiling of pioglitazone and telmisartan combination by sub-chronic toxicity study in rat.
Chatterjee, B; Das, A; Das, SK; Ibrahim, F; Kifayatullah, M; Mahmood, S; Mandal, UK; Sengupta, P, 2016
)
0.99
" Adverse effect rates were 64% with placebo, 63."( Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in combination with other oral hypoglycemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Ampudia-Blasco, FJ; Ariño, B; Giljanovic Kis, S; Naderali, E; Pérez, A; Pfarr, E; Romera, I, 2016
)
0.43
" Reporting of CTs and adverse drug reactions to Clinical Trials Registry of India and Pharmacovigilance Programme of India, respectively, along with compliance studies with warning given in package insert and epidemiological studies with larger sample size are needed."( Pioglitazone utilization, efficacy & safety in Indian type 2 diabetic patients: A systematic review & comparison with European Medicines Agency Assessment Report.
Kshirsagar, NA; Pai, SA, 2016
)
1.88
"Statin therapy is safe in patients with prediabetes/T2DM and NASH."( Liver Safety of Statins in Prediabetes or T2DM and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial.
Bril, F; Cusi, K; Hecht, J; Lomonaco, R; Orsak, B; Portillo Sanchez, P; Tio, F, 2017
)
0.46
" The potential concomitant changes in the reporting of adverse reactions concerning these alternatives have been studied less often."( Impact of Medicine Withdrawal on Reporting of Adverse Events Involving Therapeutic Alternatives: A Study from the French Spontaneous Reporting Database.
Arnaud, M; Bégaud, B; Bezin, J; Haramburu, F; Pageot, C; Pariente, A; Salvo, F; Smith, A, 2017
)
0.46
"The objective of this study was to analyse the changes in the reporting of adverse events (AEs) for therapeutic alternatives after the withdrawal of three medicines (dextropropoxyphene, pioglitazone and tetrazepam) from the market for safety reasons."( Impact of Medicine Withdrawal on Reporting of Adverse Events Involving Therapeutic Alternatives: A Study from the French Spontaneous Reporting Database.
Arnaud, M; Bégaud, B; Bezin, J; Haramburu, F; Pageot, C; Pariente, A; Salvo, F; Smith, A, 2017
)
0.65
" Therefore, it is clinically important to determine whether pioglitazone is safe in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who require treatment for secondary prevention of CV disease, since they have an intrinsically higher risk of HF."( Effect of pioglitazone on cardiometabolic profiles and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing percutaneous coronary artery intervention: a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.
Hikichi, Y; Horiuchi, K; Inoue, T; Iwasaki, Y; Kawaguchi, A; Kawasaki, T; Komukai, S; Nakao, K; Nakashima, H; Node, K; Shibata, Y; Shimomura, M; Tago, M; Tamashiro, M; Tanaka, A; Toyoda, S; Ueno, T; Yokoi, H, 2018
)
1.13
" Available data among patients with CKD suggest that pioglitazone was effective and safe, with no increase in serious adverse effects."( Safety and efficacy of low dose pioglitazone compared with standard dose pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease: A randomized controlled trial.
Satirapoj, B; Supasyndh, O; Watanakijthavonkul, K, 2018
)
1.01
" No major adverse effects including hypoglycemia, congestive heart failure and abnormal liver function were identified."( Safety and efficacy of low dose pioglitazone compared with standard dose pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease: A randomized controlled trial.
Satirapoj, B; Supasyndh, O; Watanakijthavonkul, K, 2018
)
0.76
" 45 mg is a safe dose to use in future efficacy trials."( Safety of pioglitazone during and after radiation therapy in patients with brain tumors: a phase I clinical trial.
Alphonse-Sullivan, N; Blackstock, AW; Brown, DR; Chan, MD; Cramer, CK; Cummings, TL; Isom, S; Lesser, GJ; Metheny-Barlow, LJ; Page, BR; Peiffer, AM; Rapp, S; Shaw, EG; Strowd, RE, 2019
)
0.92
"Pioglitazone, the only thiazolidinedione drug in clinical practice is under scrutiny due to reported adverse effects, it's unique insulin sensitising action provides rationale to remain as a therapeutic option for managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)."( Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.
Ahmad, I; Alam, F; Donnelly, R; Gan, SH; Idris, I; Islam, MA; Kamal, MA; Mohamed, M, 2019
)
2.27
" This finding could be of great importance for the wider use of aminoglycosides, with therapy that would reduce the occurrence of serious adverse effects, such as nephrotoxicity and acute renal failure."( Pioglitazone attenuates kidney injury in an experimental model of gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats.
Divac, N; Jovanović, GB; Kekić, D; Medić, B; Prostran, M; Radenković, M; Rovčanin, B; Škodrić, SR; Stojanović, M; Stojanović, R; Vujović, KS, 2019
)
1.96
" No statistically significant differences in total adverse events were observed between the groups."( Effectiveness and safety of different doses of pioglitazone in psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Ding, Y; Guan, MM; Kang, XJ; Xiang, F; Yu, SR; Zhang, DZ; Zhang, JZ, 2020
)
0.82
" The therapeutic effect of the daily 30 mg dose may be greater than that of the 15 mg dose per day with no significant change in the frequency of adverse reactions."( Effectiveness and safety of different doses of pioglitazone in psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Ding, Y; Guan, MM; Kang, XJ; Xiang, F; Yu, SR; Zhang, DZ; Zhang, JZ, 2020
)
0.82
" Adverse drug reactions were mild and treated symptomatically."( The evaluation of efficacy and safety of methotrexate and pioglitazone in psoriasis patients: A randomized, open-labeled, active-controlled clinical trial.
Abidi, A; Ahmad, A; Chaudhary, S; Rizvi, DA; Saxena, K,
)
0.38
"Pioglitazone alone or in combination with standard treatment may be a safe alternative drug for psoriasis coexisting with MS proving beneficial for both."( The evaluation of efficacy and safety of methotrexate and pioglitazone in psoriasis patients: A randomized, open-labeled, active-controlled clinical trial.
Abidi, A; Ahmad, A; Chaudhary, S; Rizvi, DA; Saxena, K,
)
1.82
" There were no other notable differences in adverse events between groups."( Safety and efficacy of pioglitazone for the delay of cognitive impairment in people at risk of Alzheimer's disease (TOMMORROW): a prognostic biomarker study and a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Alexander, RC; Burke, JR; Burns, DK; Chiang, C; Culp, M; Evans, RM; Haneline, S; Harrigan, P; Lutz, MW; O'Neil, J; Plassman, BL; Ratti, E; Saunders, AM; Schneider, LS; Schwarz, AJ; Welsh-Bohmer, KA; Wu, J; Yaffe, K, 2021
)
0.93
" Patients were visited every 2 months to assess the lichen planopilaris activity index (LPPAI) and record probable adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of oral pioglitazone in the management of lichen planopilaris in comparison with clobetasol: A randomized clinical trial.
Azar, PM; Balighi, K; Daneshpazhooh, M; Dasdar, S; Ghiasi, M; Kianfar, N; Lajevardi, V; Peymanfar, AA, 2022
)
1.02
"Combined treatment with pioglitazone-metformin can effectively reduce liver fat content and gamma-GT level in newly diagnosed diabetic patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and adverse events do not increase compared with the control group, showing good safety and tolerance."( Effect and Safety of Pioglitazone-Metformin Tablets in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Shaanxi Province: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Double-Simulated Multicenter Study.
Jianfang, F; Jianrong, L; Jie, M; Jing, X; Jingxuan, L; Kaiyan, M; Mengying, L; Qian, X; Qingzhen, H; Qiuhe, J; Taixiong, C; Wanxia, X; Wenjuan, Y; Xiling, G, 2023
)
1.54

Pharmacokinetics

The disposition of pioglitazone in rats may be enantioselective. SLCO1B1 polymorphism had no statistically significant effect on any of the pharmacokinetic variables of rosiglitaz one, piog litazone or their metabolites.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The half-life is about 9 hours but two active metabolites mainly contribute to the extended glucose-lowering effects."( Pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of pioglitazone.
Hanefeld, M, 2001
)
0.57
" The serum pharmacokinetic profiles of pioglitazone and its metabolites M-III and M-IV were assessed for the first and last dose administered (day 1 and day 12, respectively)."( The pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone in patients with impaired renal function.
Budde, K; Eckland, D; Fritsche, L; Neumayer, HH; Stompôr, T; Sulowicz, W, 2003
)
0.9
" There was no significant difference in the pharmacokinetic profile of pioglitazone in subjects with normal and with moderately impaired renal function."( The pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone in patients with impaired renal function.
Budde, K; Eckland, D; Fritsche, L; Neumayer, HH; Stompôr, T; Sulowicz, W, 2003
)
0.86
" Despite breaking all the "rule of five" criteria, the dimers had excellent oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties, resulting in good in vivo efficacy in db/db mice."( Large dimeric ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity in vitro and in vivo.
Albrektsen, T; Bury, PS; Deussen, HJ; Din, N; Fleckner, J; Frederiksen, KS; Jeppesen, L; Mogensen, JP; Nehlin, J; Pettersson, I; Sauerberg, P; Svensson, LA; Wulff, EM; Ynddal, L, 2003
)
0.32
" The mean half-life was 8 to 9 hours for pioglitazone and 24 to 32 hours for M-III and M-IV, with similar values at each dose level."( Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone in adolescents with type 2 diabetes.
Burghen, GA; Capparelli, EV; Christensen, ML; Meibohm, B; Tamborlane, WV; Velasquez-Mieyer, P, 2005
)
0.85
" Also, the peak plasma concentration and elimination half-life of pioglitazone remained unaffected by montelukast and zafirlukast."( Montelukast and zafirlukast do not affect the pharmacokinetics of the CYP2C8 substrate pioglitazone.
Backman, JT; Jaakkola, T; Neuvonen, M; Neuvonen, PJ; Niemi, M, 2006
)
0.79
" The results highlight the importance of in vivo interaction studies and of the incorporation of relevant pharmacokinetic properties of drugs, including plasma protein binding data, to in vitro-in vivo interaction predictions."( Montelukast and zafirlukast do not affect the pharmacokinetics of the CYP2C8 substrate pioglitazone.
Backman, JT; Jaakkola, T; Neuvonen, M; Neuvonen, PJ; Niemi, M, 2006
)
0.56
" The assay has been applied successfully to a pharmacokinetic study with human volunteers."( High-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of pioglitazone in human plasma using ultraviolet detection and its application to a pharmacokinetic study.
Neamhom, P; Saraphanchotiwitthaya, A; Sripalakit, P, 2006
)
0.57
" Because they are metabolised via cytochrome P450 (CYP), glitazones are exposed to numerous pharmacokinetic interactions."( Pharmacokinetic interactions with thiazolidinediones.
Scheen, AJ, 2007
)
0.34
" The relevant pharmacokinetic parameters including peak plasma concentration (Cmax), time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax), elimination rate constant (Kel), elimination half-life (T1/2), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-t), AUC(0-inf)), clearance (Cl) and volume of distribution (Vd) were determined."( The pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone in Thai healthy subjects.
Chompootaweep, S; Thaworn, N; Wittayalertpanya, S, 2006
)
0.64
"SLCO1B1 polymorphism had no statistically significant effect on any of the pharmacokinetic variables of rosiglitazone, pioglitazone or their metabolites."( No significant effect of SLCO1B1 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone.
Kalliokoski, A; Neuvonen, M; Neuvonen, PJ; Niemi, M, 2008
)
0.78
" Two studies were performed to determine the potential for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between vildagliptin and the sulfonylurea, glyburide, or pioglitazone in patients with Type 2 diabetes."( Evaluation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between the dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor vildagliptin, glyburide and pioglitazone in patients with Type 2 diabetes.
Balez, S; Bullock, J; Dole, WP; He, YL; Jarugula, V; Ligueros-Saylan, M; Riviere, GJ; Schwartz, S; Serra, D; Wang, Y, 2008
)
0.74
" Changes in AUC and Cmax during combination treatment were small ( pound 15%), and 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios (drug coadministration/monotherapy) were generally contained within the acceptance range for bioequivalence (0."( Evaluation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between the dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor vildagliptin, glyburide and pioglitazone in patients with Type 2 diabetes.
Balez, S; Bullock, J; Dole, WP; He, YL; Jarugula, V; Ligueros-Saylan, M; Riviere, GJ; Schwartz, S; Serra, D; Wang, Y, 2008
)
0.55
"05) increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the peak concentration (C(max)) of verapamil by 49."( Effect of pioglitazone on the pharmacokinetics of verapamil and its major metabolite, norverapamil, in rats.
Burm, JP; Choi, JS, 2008
)
0.75
" Potential pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions of alogliptin with pioglitazone or glyburide were evaluated in healthy adults."( Coadministration of pioglitazone or glyburide and alogliptin: pharmacokinetic drug interaction assessment in healthy participants.
Fleck, P; Karim, A; Laurent, A; Mekki, Q; Munsaka, M; Wann, E, 2009
)
0.91
" This study aimed to investigate any potential pharmacokinetic interaction between linagliptin and pioglitazone, a CYP 2C8 substrate."( Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interaction between the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin and pioglitazone in healthy volunteers.
Dugi, KA; Graefe-Mody, EU; Jungnik, A; Ring, A; Woerle, HJ, 2010
)
0.79
"Linagliptinand pioglitazone have no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction and may be co-administered without dose adjustment."( Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interaction between the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin and pioglitazone in healthy volunteers.
Dugi, KA; Graefe-Mody, EU; Jungnik, A; Ring, A; Woerle, HJ, 2010
)
0.93
" The method was successfully applied for pharmacokinetic study of pioglitazone and felodipine from bioadhesive buccal tablet after buccal administration to pigs."( Development of a high-performance liquid chromatography method for simultaneous determination of pioglitazone and felodipine in pig serum: application to pharmacokinetic study.
Gannu, R; Palem, CR; Yamsani, MR; Yamsani, SK; Yamsani, VV, 2011
)
0.82
" The method proved highly reproducible and sensitive and was successfully applied in a pharmacokinetic study after single dose oral administration of olmesartan and pioglitazone to the rat."( Development and validation of an LC-ESI-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantitation of olmesartan and pioglitazone in rat plasma and its pharmacokinetic application.
Bhaumik, U; Chakraborty, US; Chatterjee, B; Pal, TK; Roy, B; Sarkar, AK; Sengupta, P, 2010
)
0.77
" The current studies assessed the potential for pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between dapagliflozin and pioglitazone, metformin, glimepiride or sitagliptin in healthy subjects following single-dose administration."( Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between dapagliflozin, a novel sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitor, and metformin, pioglitazone, glimepiride or sitagliptin in healthy subjects.
Boulton, DW; Griffen, SC; Kasichayanula, S; LaCreta, FP; Li, T; Liu, X; Pfister, M; Shyu, WC; Zhang, W, 2011
)
0.79
"To evaluate the pharmacokinetic interactions of the potent, selective, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, saxagliptin, in combination with metformin, glyburide or pioglitazone."( Saxagliptin, a potent, selective inhibitor of DPP-4, does not alter the pharmacokinetics of three oral antidiabetic drugs (metformin, glyburide or pioglitazone) in healthy subjects.
Boulton, DW; Brenner, E; Handschuh del Corral, M; Komoroski, B; Kornhauser, D; Li, L; Patel, CG; Vachharajani, N, 2011
)
0.77
" The developed method was applied for preclinical pharmacokinetic studies."( Novel liquid chromatographic method for simultaneous estimation of pioglitazone and glimepiride in rat plasma by solid phase extraction: application to preclinical pharmacokinetic studies.
Deshpande, PB; Karthik, A; Musmade, PB; Pandey, S; Pathak, SM; Talole, KB; Udupa, N, 2011
)
0.61
" Samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental modeling."( Pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone after multiple oral dose administration in horses.
Ashraf-Khorassani, M; Crisman, MV; Davis, JL; Geor, RJ; Hodgson, DR; McCutcheon, LJ; Suagee, JK; Wearn, JM, 2011
)
0.69
" The novel compound linagliptin has important different pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, when compared with previously commercialized DPP-4 inhibitors, which may offer some advantages in clinical practice."( Linagliptin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (pharmacokinetic evaluation).
Scheen, AJ, 2011
)
0.37
" Pharmacokinetic study was performed by orally administering PIO and OLM at single dose of 3 and 2mg/kg, respectively alone and in combination analyzing the plasma samples using LC-MS/MS."( Development of safety profile evaluating pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicity of a combination of pioglitazone and olmesartan medoxomil in Wistar albino rats.
Nandi, U; Pal, TK; Sengupta, P, 2012
)
0.59
"This study was aimed to develop a maximum a posteriori Bayesian (MAPB) estimation method to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters based on D-optimal sampling strategy."( [Estimation of individual pharmacokinetic parameters using maximum a posteriori Bayesian method with D-optimal sampling strategy].
Ding, JJ; Jiao, Z; Wang, Y, 2011
)
0.37
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using two-compartmental analysis for IV data and noncompartmental analysis for oral data."( Pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone in lean and obese cats.
Clark, MH; Dirikolu, L; Ferguson, DC; Hoenig, M, 2012
)
0.7
" The aim of this study was to elucidate potential pharmacokinetic interaction between RA and pioglitazone, and to provide guidance for clinical medicine safety."( Herb-drug pharmacokinetic interaction between radix astragali and pioglitazone in rats.
Gao, JW; Huang, M; Huang, P; Lu, YS; Shi, Z; Yao, MC; Yuan, YM, 2012
)
0.84
" Between healthy and healthy-RAD groups, half-life (T(1/2)), area under the curve (AUC (0-t)), Vz/F, and Cl/F showed mild yet statistically significant differences; no significant difference for any above parameter was detected between T2DM and T2DM-RAD groups."( Herb-drug pharmacokinetic interaction between radix astragali and pioglitazone in rats.
Gao, JW; Huang, M; Huang, P; Lu, YS; Shi, Z; Yao, MC; Yuan, YM, 2012
)
0.62
" The purpose of this investigation was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model using nonlinear mixed effects analysis to evaluate and quantify the effect of CYP2C8*3, demographic, and clinical variables on interindividual variability in pioglitazone pharmacokinetics in nondiabetic adults."( Effect of Cytochrome P450 2C8*3 on the Population Pharmacokinetics of Pioglitazone in Healthy Caucasian Volunteers.
Aquilante, C; Bourne, D; Kadam, R; Kompella, U, 2013
)
0.81
"Prospective, open-label, single-dose pharmacokinetic study."( Influence of CYP2C8*2 on the pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone in healthy African-American volunteers.
Aquilante, CL; Kosmiski, LA; Predhomme, JA; Sidhom, MS; Spencer, SH; Wempe, MF, 2013
)
0.64
"Participants received a single 15-mg dose of pioglitazone in the fasted state, followed by a 48-hour pharmacokinetic study."( Influence of CYP2C8*2 on the pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone in healthy African-American volunteers.
Aquilante, CL; Kosmiski, LA; Predhomme, JA; Sidhom, MS; Spencer, SH; Wempe, MF, 2013
)
0.9
" Pioglitazone area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC)0-∞ and half-life (t1/2 ) did not differ significantly between CYP2C8*1/*1 and CYP2C8*2 carriers (AUC0-∞ 7331 ± 2846 vs 10431 ± 5090 ng*h/ml, p=0."( Influence of CYP2C8*2 on the pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone in healthy African-American volunteers.
Aquilante, CL; Kosmiski, LA; Predhomme, JA; Sidhom, MS; Spencer, SH; Wempe, MF, 2013
)
1.55
" The method is simple, selective, robust economic and has been applied successfully to more than 2000 plasma samples as part of pharmacokinetic study in humans."( Development and validation of highly selective and robust method for simultaneous estimation of pioglitazone, hydroxypioglitazone and metformin in human plasma by LC-MS/MS: application to a pharmacokinetic study.
Bharathi, DV; Jagadeesh, B; Narayana, VS; Pankaj, C; Venkateswarulu, V, 2013
)
0.61
"The object of this study is to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction of pioglitazone hydrochloride and atorvastatin calcium in healthy adult Beagle dogs following single and multiple oral dose administration."( [Pharmacokinetic interaction of pioglitazone hydrochloride and atorvastatin calcium in Beagle dogs].
Chen, HL; Dang, HW; Wang, XY; Yang, FY; Yang, WC; Zhang, WP, 2013
)
0.9
"The objective of the current study was to assess the possible pharmacokinetic interactions of spirulina with glitazones in an insulin resistance rat model."( Assessment of pharmacokinetic interaction of spirulina with glitazone in a type 2 diabetes rat model.
Al-Dhubiab, BE; Chattopadhyaya, I; Gupta, A; Gupta, S; Kumria, R; Nair, A, 2013
)
0.39
" The differences between the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-24, AUC0-∞, CL/F of (+)-pioglitazone and (-)-pioglitazone were significant, suggesting that the disposition of pioglitazone in rats may be enantioselective."( Chiral liquid chromatography resolution and stereoselective pharmacokinetic study of pioglitazone enantiomers in rats.
Du, B; Pang, L; Shen, G; Yang, Y; Zhang, Z, 2014
)
0.85
"The purpose of this study was to develop floating microparticles containing Pioglitazone HCl, for controlled release and perform pharmacodynamic studies."( Design, statistical optimisation, characterisation and pharmacodynamic studies on Pioglitazone hydrochloride floating microparticles.
Baby, B; Gupta, NV; Haritha, P; Mathews, R; Rajarajan, S; Ramesh, K; Rao, BP, 2014
)
0.86
" The pharmacokinetic effect of RRR on pioglitazone was studied in healthy rats and type 2 diabetic rats."( Effect of raw Radix Rehmanniae on the pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone in rats.
Gao, J; Shi, Z; Yao, M; Yuan, Y; Zhu, S, 2014
)
0.92
"The rapid, sensitive, and selective liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry method (LC-ESI-MS/MS) for the simultaneous estimation and pharmacokinetic investigation of glimepiride and pioglitazone in human plasma has been developed and fully validated."( Simultaneous determination of glimepiride and pioglitazone in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and its application to pharmacokinetic study.
Hu, JQ; Ni, XJ; Qiu, C; Shang, DW; Wang, ZZ; Wen, YG; Zhang, M, 2014
)
0.85
" The pharmacokinetic parameters of nifedipine and dehydronifedipine were determined after oral and intravenous administrations of nifedipine to rats in the presence and absence of pioglitazone (0."( Effects of pioglitazone on the pharmacokinetics of nifedipine and its main metabolite, dehydronifedipine, in rats.
Choi, DH; Choi, I; Choi, JS, 2016
)
1.02
" The simple and robust LC/MS/MS method was successfully applied for the simultaneous determination of phentermine and topiramate in a pharmacokinetic study in healthy male Chinese volunteers."( Simultaneous determination of phentermine and topiramate in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with positive/negative ion-switching electrospray ionization and its application in pharmacokinetic study.
Chen, H; Haseeb, S; He, X; Li, H; Li, W; Ni, Y; Xu, M; Zhou, Y, 2015
)
0.42
" The method was validated as per FDA guidelines and successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study of rosiglitazone in rats."( LC-MS/MS method for the determination of rosiglitazone on rat dried blood spots and rat urine: Application to pharmacokinetics.
Ramesh, T; Rao, PN; Rao, RN, 2015
)
0.42
" No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions between the two agents have been described and the fixed-dose combination has shown bioequivalence with alogliptin and pioglitazone given separately."( Pharmacokinetics and clinical evaluation of the alogliptin plus pioglitazone combination for type 2 diabetes.
Scheen, AJ, 2015
)
0.85
" The geometric mean ratio (GMR) for pioglitazone Cmax at steady state (Cmax,ss) and for AUC during the dosing interval at steady state (AUCτ,ss) when coadministered with empagliflozin versus administration alone was 187."( Pharmacokinetics of Empagliflozin and Pioglitazone After Coadministration in Healthy Volunteers.
Broedl, UC; Macha, S; Mattheus, M; Pinnetti, S; Woerle, HJ, 2015
)
0.96
" We investigated whether the variant genotypes of cytochrome P450 2C8 (CYP2C8), CYP2C9, CYP3A5 and transporter ABCB1 influence the pharmacokinetic phenotype of the substrate pioglitazone in Chinese individuals."( Effects of functional CYP2C8,CYP2C9,CYP3A5,and ABCB1 genetic variants on the pharmacokinetics of insulin sensitizer pioglitazone in Chinese Han individuals.
Li, P; Lou, YQ; Lu, C; Lu, Y; Qi, GZ; Qi, HM; Wang, X; Wei, MJ; Yin, SJ; Zhang, GL; Zhang, P, 2017
)
0.86
"Significant differences were seen in pharmacokinetic parameters of pioglitazone like AUC, t1/2, Ke, Cl/F, Vd/F when given in combination with cinnamon in normal and diabetic rabbits."( Effect of Cinnamomum cassia on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Pioglitazone.
Koganti, B; Koganti, VSRGP; Mamindla, S; Ravouru, N, 2017
)
0.92
"Although the mechanism of action for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonists has been extensively explored, the impact of the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile on the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of PPARγ agonists has not been elucidated in detail."( Influence of the pharmacokinetic profile on the plasma glucose lowering effect of the PPARγ agonist pioglitazone in Wistar fatty rats.
Amano, N; Goto, A; Kimura, Y; Kogame, A; Moriya, Y; Tagawa, Y, 2017
)
0.67
" The aim of this research was to experimentally evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction of pioglitazone and telmisartan when are coadministered in rat."( Assessment of preclinical pharmacokinetics and acute toxicity of pioglitazone and telmisartan combination.
Chatterjee, B; Pal, TK; Sengupta, P, 2017
)
0.91
" The objectives of this study were to assess the pharmacodynamic effects of oral pioglitazone on morphometric parameters, hepatic enzyme activity and function, adipokines, and enteroinsular response to oral sugar."( Pharmacodynamic Effects of Pioglitazone on High Molecular Weight Adiponectin Concentrations and Insulin Response After Oral Sugar in Equids.
Bello, K; Davis, JL; Judd, RL; Legere, RM; Parker, C; Taylor, DR; Wooldridge, AA, 2019
)
1.04
" The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between evogliptin and pioglitazone."( Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Interaction Between Evogliptin and Pioglitazone in Healthy Male Subjects.
Hwang, I; Jang, IJ; Kim, Y; Lee, S; Yoo, H; Yu, KS, 2020
)
1
" Serial blood samples were collected for 24 hours for pharmacokinetic analysis and 3 hours after the oral glucose tolerance test for the pharmacodynamic analysis."( Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Interaction Between Evogliptin and Pioglitazone in Healthy Male Subjects.
Hwang, I; Jang, IJ; Kim, Y; Lee, S; Yoo, H; Yu, KS, 2020
)
0.79
"Concomitant administration of evogliptin and pioglitazone showed similar glucose-lowering effects with those of evogliptin alone without pharmacokinetic interactions when compared to the intake of each drug alone."( Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Interaction Between Evogliptin and Pioglitazone in Healthy Male Subjects.
Hwang, I; Jang, IJ; Kim, Y; Lee, S; Yoo, H; Yu, KS, 2020
)
1.05
" To estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters, the diabetic animals were assigned to 2 groups: one group received PIO (10 mg/kg), while the other received PIO + caffeine (20 mg/kg)."( Caffeine modulates pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of pioglitazone in diabetic rats: Impact on therapeutics.
Alkahtani, SA; Alshabi, AM; Habeeb, MS; Shaikh, IA, 2021
)
0.86
" Serum pioglitazone concentration was estimated by high performance liquid chromatography method for pharmacokinetic data."( Influence of trazodone on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone.
Ahad, A; Chinthaginjala, H; Goruntla, N; Pradeepkumar, B; Raghavendra, M; Reddy, KS; Sudheer, A,
)
0.82
"Trazodone apparently produced pharmacokinetic interaction with pioglitazone which might be by attenuating the metabolism of pioglitazone."( Influence of trazodone on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone.
Ahad, A; Chinthaginjala, H; Goruntla, N; Pradeepkumar, B; Raghavendra, M; Reddy, KS; Sudheer, A,
)
0.6

Compound-Compound Interactions

Study aimed to determine whether pioglitazone combined with atorvastatin can restrain the progression of atherosclerosis and promote plaque stabilization in a rabbit model.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The effects of dietary fructose alone or in combination with a new oral agent, pioglitazone, on VLDL-triglyceride (TG) turnover were studied in genetically obese Wistar fatty rats characterized by hyperinsulinemia (7,488 +/- 954 pmol/l), hyperglycemia, (22."( VLDL triglyceride kinetics in Wistar fatty rats, an animal model of NIDDM: effects of dietary fructose alone or in combination with pioglitazone.
Amano, N; Ebara, T; Hirano, T; Hozumi, T; Ishida, Y; Kazumi, T; Odaka, H; Yoshino, G, 1996
)
0.73
"This study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and tolerability of pioglitazone in combination with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus."( Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. The Pioglitazone 027 Study Group.
Egan, JW; Einhorn, D; Mathisen, AL; Rendell, M; Rosenzweig, J; Schneider, RL, 2000
)
1.98
"To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of pioglitazone in combination with a sulfonylurea in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus."( Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with sulfonylurea therapy improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.
Egan, JW; Kipnes, MS; Krosnick, A; Mathisen, AL; Rendell, MS; Schneider, RL, 2001
)
2.01
" PIO 30mg combined with MET enhanced HOMA-S versus baseline (66."( Pioglitazone as monotherapy or in combination with sulfonylurea or metformin enhances insulin sensitivity (HOMA-S or QUICKI) in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Gilmore, KJ; Glazer, NB; Johns, D; Tan, MH; Widel, M, 2004
)
1.77
" Data have been lacking on their use in combination with both sulfonylurea and metformin among patients of type 2 diabetes who are on insulin therapy secondary to failure of routine oral hypoglycemic drugs in controlling their diabetes."( Beneficial effects of triple drug combination of pioglitazone with glibenclamide and metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients on insulin therapy.
Chandalia, HB; Fafadia, A; Joshi, SR; Panikar, V; Santvana, C, 2003
)
0.57
"To determine the effects of pioglitazone in combination with sulphonylurea and metformin on diabetes control in patients being treated with insulin due to secondary failure of oral hypoglycemic agents."( Beneficial effects of triple drug combination of pioglitazone with glibenclamide and metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients on insulin therapy.
Chandalia, HB; Fafadia, A; Joshi, SR; Panikar, V; Santvana, C, 2003
)
0.87
" They were switched on to triple drug combination of glibenclamide 5 mg, metformin 500 mg and pioglitazone 15 mg along with insulin."( Beneficial effects of triple drug combination of pioglitazone with glibenclamide and metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients on insulin therapy.
Chandalia, HB; Fafadia, A; Joshi, SR; Panikar, V; Santvana, C, 2003
)
0.79
"A Phase II trial was initiated to analyze the activity of a continuously administered molecularly targeted treatment regimen (daily pioglitazone [45 mg administered orally] and rofecoxib [25 mg administered orally]) combined with sequentially added angiostatic chemotherapy for patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma (n = 19) or soft tissue sarcoma (n = 21)."( Pioglitazone and rofecoxib combined with angiostatically scheduled trofosfamide in the treatment of far-advanced melanoma and soft tissue sarcoma.
Andreesen, R; Bataille, F; Berand, A; Bross, K; Krause, SW; Reichle, A; Vogt, T; Wild, P, 2004
)
1.97
"To evaluate the clinical efficacy and tolerability of pioglitazone monotherapy or in combination with sulfonylurea therapy in the treatment of chinese patients with type 2 diabetes."( [Pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy or in combination with sulfonylurea therapy improves glycemia control in patients with type 2 diabetes].
Fan, J; Gao, H; Li, Y; Liao, Z; Wang, C; Wang, Y; Yu, H; Yu, Y; Zhao, W, 2003
)
1.48
"In patients with type 2 diabetes, pioglitazone monotherapy or in combination with sulfonylurea therapy significantly improves HbA1c, FBG and PBG levels and reserves the beta-cell function with beneficial effects on serum triglyceride and HDL-C levels."( [Pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy or in combination with sulfonylurea therapy improves glycemia control in patients with type 2 diabetes].
Fan, J; Gao, H; Li, Y; Liao, Z; Wang, C; Wang, Y; Yu, H; Yu, Y; Zhao, W, 2003
)
1.51
" Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) caused by induction of CYP3A4 can result in decreased exposure to coadministered drugs, with potential loss of efficacy."( Use of immortalized human hepatocytes to predict the magnitude of clinical drug-drug interactions caused by CYP3A4 induction.
de Morais, SM; Fahmi, OA; Liras, JL; Maurer, TS; Mills, JB; Ripp, SL; Trevena, KA, 2006
)
0.33
"In this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group trial, 103 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome were randomized to receive one of two thiazolidinediones--pioglitazone or rosiglitazone--in combination with 1500 mg/day of metformin, increasing up to 3000 mg/day, for 12 months."( Effects of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone combined with metformin on the prothrombotic state of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome.
Ciccarelli, L; Cicero, AF; Dangelo, A; Derosa, G; Ferrari, I; Galli, S; Gravina, A; Montagna, L; Paniga, S; Piccinni, MN; Pricolo, F; Ragonesi, PD; Salvadeo, S,
)
0.61
"The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor vildagliptin in combination with the thiazolidinedione (TZD) pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM)."( Vildagliptin in combination with pioglitazone improves glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes failing thiazolidinedione monotherapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.
Baron, MA; Dejager, S; Garber, AJ; Rochotte, E; Schweizer, A, 2007
)
0.81
"This study was performed to ascertain whether losartan combined with pioglitazone is superior to losartan alone in delaying the progression of chronic renal failure in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy."( Renoprotection provided by losartan in combination with pioglitazone is superior to renoprotection provided by losartan alone in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy.
Jin, HM; Pan, Y, 2007
)
0.82
"Renoprotection conferred by losartan combined with pioglitazone is superior to that conferred by losartan alone in subjects with type 2 diabetic nephropathy."( Renoprotection provided by losartan in combination with pioglitazone is superior to renoprotection provided by losartan alone in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy.
Jin, HM; Pan, Y, 2007
)
0.84
"The aim of this randomized placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pioglitazone administered alone or in combination with metformin in reducing insulin dosage requirements for improved glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes previously poorly controlled with combination therapy."( Effect of pioglitazone in combination with insulin therapy on glycaemic control, insulin dose requirement and lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes previously poorly controlled with combination therapy.
Berhanu, P; Perez, A; Yu, S, 2007
)
0.96
"0% at screening treated with combination therapy initially were given titrated insulin therapy (to fasting plasma glucose <140 mg/dl) and then were randomly assigned to 20-week treatment with pioglitazone or placebo in combination with insulin, with or without concurrent metformin therapy."( Effect of pioglitazone in combination with insulin therapy on glycaemic control, insulin dose requirement and lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes previously poorly controlled with combination therapy.
Berhanu, P; Perez, A; Yu, S, 2007
)
0.93
"Pioglitazone in combination with insulin therapy improved glycaemic control, reduced insulin dose requirements and improved lipid profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes previously poorly controlled with combination therapy."( Effect of pioglitazone in combination with insulin therapy on glycaemic control, insulin dose requirement and lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes previously poorly controlled with combination therapy.
Berhanu, P; Perez, A; Yu, S, 2007
)
2.18
"This preliminary analysis of an observational, non-randomised, open-label ongoing study has shown that early use of combination therapy at time of diagnosis or within the first 3-6 months following diagnosis with metformin plus pioglitazone in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes results in a slower deterioration in glycaemic control than that with metformin combined with either gliclazide or repaglinide."( Effects of early use of pioglitazone in combination with metformin in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.
Baird, J; Campbell, IW; Chalmers, J; Franks, CI; Hunter, JE; Mariz, S; Martin, M; Robertson, SJ; Whately-Smith, CR, 2007
)
0.83
"The objective of the study was to demonstrate the effect of pioglitazone and pioglitazone in combination with statin on East Indian patients with hyperinsulinemia and hyperlipidemia."( Effect of pioglitazone and its combination with statins in coronary artery disease patients with hyperinsulinemia.
Baxi, H; Chag, M; Chandarana, A; Goyal, R; Mehta, A; Naik, A; Parikh, K; Shah, K; Shah, U, 2007
)
0.98
" Pioglitazone monotherapy significantly attenuated cardiovascular p22(phox) and Rac1 in SHRSP, whereas pioglitazone combined with candesartan more attenuated p22(phox) and significantly reduced Nox1."( Beneficial effects of pioglitazone on hypertensive cardiovascular injury are enhanced by combination with candesartan.
Dong, YF; Kataoka, K; Kim-Mitsuyama, S; Matsuba, S; Nakamura, T; Ogawa, H; Tokutomi, Y; Yamamoto, E; Yamashita, T, 2008
)
1.57
"A phase II trial was initiated to analyze the activity of continuously administered pioglitazone and rofecoxib combined with low-dose chemotherapy (capecitabine or temozolomide) in patients with high-grade gliomas (glioblastoma or anaplastic glioma)."( Low-dose chemotherapy in combination with COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR-gamma agonists in recurrent high-grade gliomas - a phase II study.
Baumgart, U; Bogdahn, U; Hau, P; Hirschmann, B; Kunz-Schughart, L; Muhleisen, H; Reichle, A; Ruemmele, P; Steinbrecher, A; Weimann, E, 2007
)
0.56
" These results provide a strong argument for using alogliptin in combination with pioglitazone."( The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin in combination with pioglitazone improves glycemic control, lipid profiles, and increases pancreatic insulin content in ob/ob mice.
Asakawa, T; Kataoka, O; Moritoh, Y; Odaka, H; Takeuchi, K, 2009
)
0.81
" Potential pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions of alogliptin with pioglitazone or glyburide were evaluated in healthy adults."( Coadministration of pioglitazone or glyburide and alogliptin: pharmacokinetic drug interaction assessment in healthy participants.
Fleck, P; Karim, A; Laurent, A; Mekki, Q; Munsaka, M; Wann, E, 2009
)
0.91
"Pioglitazone use in combination with insulin resulted in a sustained improved glycemic control and allowed the treatment regimens to be simplified and the insulin doses reduced."( Pioglitazone use in combination with insulin in the prospective pioglitazone clinical trial in macrovascular events study (PROactive19).
Birkeland, K; Charbonnel, B; Davidson, J; DeFronzo, R; Pirags, V; Scheen, A; Schmitz, O, 2010
)
3.25
"The induction of cytochrome P450 (P450) enzymes is one of the risk factors for drug-drug interactions (DDIs)."( Investigation of drug-drug interactions caused by human pregnane X receptor-mediated induction of CYP3A4 and CYP2C subfamilies in chimeric mice with a humanized liver.
Hasegawa, M; Inoue, R; Kakuni, M; Tahara, H; Tateno, C; Ushiki, J, 2012
)
0.38
"Few studies have given suggestions on appropriate initiation insulin dosage when combined with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs)."( Appropriate insulin initiation dosage for insulin-naive type 2 diabetes outpatients receiving insulin monotherapy or in combination with metformin and/or pioglitazone.
Dong, JJ; Liao, L; Mou, YR; Qiu, LL; Yang, M; Zhao, JJ, 2010
)
0.56
"The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of alogliptin combined with pioglitazone in metformin-treated type 2 diabetic patients."( Efficacy and tolerability of the DPP-4 inhibitor alogliptin combined with pioglitazone, in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.
Burant, CF; DeFronzo, RA; Fleck, P; Mekki, Q; Pratley, RE; Wilson, C, 2012
)
0.83
"5 or 25 mg qd) alone or combined with pioglitazone (15, 30, or 45 mg qd) in 1554 patients on stable-dose metformin monotherapy (≥1500 mg) with inadequate glycemic control."( Efficacy and tolerability of the DPP-4 inhibitor alogliptin combined with pioglitazone, in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.
Burant, CF; DeFronzo, RA; Fleck, P; Mekki, Q; Pratley, RE; Wilson, C, 2012
)
0.88
"The hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) influence the pharmacokinetics of several drug classes and are involved in many clinical drug-drug interactions."( Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
Artursson, P; Haglund, U; Karlgren, M; Kimoto, E; Lai, Y; Norinder, U; Vildhede, A; Wisniewski, JR, 2012
)
0.38
"The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which the CYP2C8*3 allele influences pharmacokinetic variability in the drug-drug interaction between gemfibrozil (CYP2C8 inhibitor) and pioglitazone (CYP2C8 substrate)."( Impact of the CYP2C8 *3 polymorphism on the drug-drug interaction between gemfibrozil and pioglitazone.
Aquilante, CL; Bourne, DW; Bushman, LR; Daily, EB; Hammond, KP; Hopley, CW; Kadam, RS; Kanack, AT; Kompella, UB; Kosmiski, LA; Le, M; Predhomme, JA; Rower, JE; Sidhom, MS, 2013
)
0.8
"CYP2C8*3 is associated with decreased pioglitazone plasma exposure in vivo and significantly influences the pharmacokinetic magnitude of the gemfibrozil-pioglitazone drug-drug interaction."( Impact of the CYP2C8 *3 polymorphism on the drug-drug interaction between gemfibrozil and pioglitazone.
Aquilante, CL; Bourne, DW; Bushman, LR; Daily, EB; Hammond, KP; Hopley, CW; Kadam, RS; Kanack, AT; Kompella, UB; Kosmiski, LA; Le, M; Predhomme, JA; Rower, JE; Sidhom, MS, 2013
)
0.88
" The adverse event (AE) profile and effects on glycemic control have not been assessed for the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide once weekly in combination with a thiazolidinedione (TZD) with or without metformin."( Safety of exenatide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with a thiazolidinedione alone or in combination with metformin for 2 years.
Boardman, MK; Haber, H; Liutkus, JF; Norwood, P; Pintilei, E; Trautmann, ME, 2012
)
0.38
"To compare pioglitazone or glibenclamide alone and in combination with rosuvastatin on hepatic steatosis in type 2 diabetic patients."( Ultrasonography modifications of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue after pioglitazone or glibenclamide therapy combined with rosuvastatin in type 2 diabetic patients not well controlled by metformin.
D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Fogari, E; Maffioli, P; Perrone, T, 2013
)
1.01
"The objective was to study the of drug-drug interaction between voriconazole and oral hypoglycemic agents in normal and alloxan induced diabetic rats."( Drug-drug interaction between voriconazole and oral hypoglycemic agents in diabetic rats.
Diwan, PV; Joshi, B; Kumar, BH; Singh, JC,
)
0.13
" The present study aimed to investigate the effect of different doses of pioglitazone alone and in combination with sulfasalazine in TNBS (trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid)-induced inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in rats."( Comparative evaluation of different doses of PPAR-γ agonist alone and in combination with sulfasalazine in experimentally induced inflammatory bowel disease in rats.
Byrav D S, P; Chakrabarti, A; Khanduja, KL; Medhi, B; Prakash, A; Vaiphei, K, 2013
)
0.62
"Forty rabbits were randomly divided into five groups of eight: normal control, hyperlipidemia model, pioglitazone, simvastatin, and pioglitazone combined with simvastatin therapy."( Effect of pioglitazone combined with simvastatin on the CD40-CD40 ligand system in rabbits with atherosclerosis.
Bao, XC; Gao, XQ; Ji, XP; Li, HW; Qiu, YH; Wu, Z; Xue, L; Yang, XF; Zhu, XH, 2015
)
1.04
"We investigated the possibilities of drug-drug interactions between luseogliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, and oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in healthy Japanese males."( Absence of Drug-Drug Interactions Between Luseogliflozin, a Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter-2 Inhibitor, and Various Oral Antidiabetic Drugs in Healthy Japanese Males.
Fukatsu, A; Sakai, S; Samukawa, Y; Sasaki, T; Seino, Y; Ubukata, M, 2015
)
0.42
"While co-administered gemfibrozil can increase the area under the concentration/time curve (AUC) of pioglitazone more than 3-fold, the underlying mechanism of the drug-drug interaction between gemfibrozil and pioglitazone has not been fully understood."( Underlying mechanism of drug-drug interaction between pioglitazone and gemfibrozil: Gemfibrozil acyl-glucuronide is a mechanism-based inhibitor of CYP2C8.
Fujiwara, R; Itoh, T; Sakamoto, M; Takagi, M, 2015
)
0.88
"Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in combination with pioglitazone, an agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ), can reduce liver fibrosis in models of liver injury."( Repeated Intraportal Injection of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Combination with Pioglitazone in Patients with Compensated Cirrhosis: A Clinical Report of Two Cases.
Aghdami, N; Akhlaghpoor, S; Ashrafi, M; Azimian, V; Baharvand, H; Hosseini, SE; Jarughi, N; Malekzadeh, R; Mardpour, S; Mohamadnejad, M; Moossavi, S; Nikfam, S; Vosough, M, 2016
)
0.9
"To analyze the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin combined with other oral hypoglycemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus."( Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in combination with other oral hypoglycemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Ampudia-Blasco, FJ; Ariño, B; Giljanovic Kis, S; Naderali, E; Pérez, A; Pfarr, E; Romera, I, 2016
)
0.43
"Pooled analysis of three phase III trials in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=1,801) who received placebo or empagliflozin 10 or 25mg once daily for 24 weeks, in combination with metformin, metformin+sulphonylurea or pioglitazone ± metformin."( Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in combination with other oral hypoglycemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Ampudia-Blasco, FJ; Ariño, B; Giljanovic Kis, S; Naderali, E; Pérez, A; Pfarr, E; Romera, I, 2016
)
0.62
"Empagliflozin combined with other oral treatments decreased HbA1c, body weight, and SBP/DBP as compared to placebo, with a good safety and tolerability profile."( Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in combination with other oral hypoglycemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Ampudia-Blasco, FJ; Ariño, B; Giljanovic Kis, S; Naderali, E; Pérez, A; Pfarr, E; Romera, I, 2016
)
0.43
"The study aims to investigate the effect of vitamin D (VD) combined with pioglitazone hydrochloride (PIO) on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism in patients with Type 2 diabetic nephropathy (T2DN)."( Effects of vitamin D combined with pioglitazone hydrochloride on bone mineral density and bone metabolism in Type 2 diabetic nephropathy.
Dong, L; Li, BL; Wang, LX; Wang, N; Xu, QL; Yan, W, 2017
)
0.96
" The aim of the study was to evaluate whether dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor alogliptin (ALO) alone or in combination with pioglitazone (PIO) improves β-cell function along with insulin resistance (IR) in metformin (MET) treated obese women with PCOS with persistent IR."( Add on DPP-4 inhibitor alogliptin alone or in combination with pioglitazone improved β-cell function and insulin sensitivity in metformin treated PCOS.
Goricar, K; Janez, A; Jensterle, M, 2017
)
0.9
"ALO alone and in combination with PIO improved IR along with dynamic IS and meal related β-cell function when added to MET treated PCOS."( Add on DPP-4 inhibitor alogliptin alone or in combination with pioglitazone improved β-cell function and insulin sensitivity in metformin treated PCOS.
Goricar, K; Janez, A; Jensterle, M, 2017
)
0.69
" The suggestion of this Expert Panel is that, pending forthcoming randomized clinical trials, physicians should consider using a PPARgamma agonist, such as pioglitazone, or, statin use in those with NAFLD/NASH at high CVD or HCC risk, alone and/or preferably in combination with each other or with ezetimibe, for the primary or secondary prevention of CVD, and the avoidance of cirrhosis, liver transplantation or HCC, bearing in mind that CVD is the main cause of death in NAFLD/NASH patients."( The use of statins alone, or in combination with pioglitazone and other drugs, for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and related cardiovascular risk. An Expert Panel Statement.
Alexandrides, TK; Athyros, VG; Bilianou, H; Cholongitas, E; Doumas, M; Elisaf, MS; Ganotakis, ES; Germanidis, G; Giouleme, O; Goudevenos, J; Karagiannis, A; Karvounis, C; Katsiki, N; Kotsis, V; Kountouras, J; Liberopoulos, E; Mantzoros, C; Mikhailidis, DP; Pitsavos, C; Polyzos, S; Rallidis, LS; Richter, D; Tsapas, AG; Tselepis, AD; Tsioufis, K; Tziomalos, K; Tzotzas, T; Vasiliadis, TG; Vlachopoulos, C, 2017
)
0.91
"Diabetes was induced in Wistar rats by intraperitoneal administration of 175 mg of nicotinamide/kg body weight in combination with 65 mg of streptozotocin/kg body weight and then fed with high fat diet for 4 weeks (Group II-VII)."( Hybrid drug combination: Anti-diabetic treatment of type 2 diabetic Wistar rats with combination of ellagic acid and pioglitazone.
Doble, M; Nankar, RP, 2017
)
0.66
"This study was conducted to evaluate the likelihood of daprodustat to act as a perpetrator in drug-drug interactions (DDI) with the CYP2C8 enzyme and OATP1B1 transporter using the probe substrates pioglitazone and rosuvastatin as potential victims, respectively."( The drug interaction potential of daprodustat when coadministered with pioglitazone, rosuvastatin, or trimethoprim in healthy subjects.
Caltabiano, S; Cizman, B; Cobitz, AR; Lister, K; Mahar, KM; Ravindranath, R; Tenero, D, 2018
)
0.9
"Cell viability of 143B human osteosarcoma cells was significantly reduced when PIO (50 μmol/l) was combined with CDDP compared to CDDP alone."( PPARγ Agonist Pioglitazone in Combination With Cisplatinum Arrests a Chemotherapy-resistant Osteosarcoma PDOX Model.
Bouvet, M; Hayashi, K; Higuchi, T; Hoffman, RM; Igarashi, K; Kimura, H; Miwa, S; Nishino, H; Singh, SR; Sugisawa, N; Tashiro, Y; Tsuchiya, H; Yamamoto, J; Yamamoto, N,
)
0.49
" This study aimed to investigate the anti-cancer potential of PPAR-γ agonist Pioglitazone combined with COX-2 inhibitor Celelcoxib in NSCLC."( Preliminary evaluation of anticancer efficacy of pioglitazone combined with celecoxib for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.
Kiran, AVVVR; Krishnamurthy, PT; Kumari, GK, 2022
)
1.2
"The significant tumor reducing potential of pioglitazone combined with celecoxib was observed (p < 0."( Preliminary evaluation of anticancer efficacy of pioglitazone combined with celecoxib for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.
Kiran, AVVVR; Krishnamurthy, PT; Kumari, GK, 2022
)
1.24
" These beneficial effects of VIT D may expand its use by diabetics combined with antidiabetic drugs due to its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antiapoptotic properties."( Vitamin D Combined with Pioglitazone Mitigates Type-2 Diabetes-induced Hepatic Injury Through Targeting Inflammation, Apoptosis, and Oxidative Stress.
Elyamany, MF; Hamouda, HA; Mansour, SM, 2022
)
1.03
" Our study aimed to determine whether pioglitazone combined with atorvastatin can restrain the progression of atherosclerosis and promote plaque stabilization in a rabbit model."( Pioglitazone combined with atorvastatin promotes plaque stabilization in a rabbit model.
Chen, X; Liang, Z; Nie, M; Yan, Y; Zhang, X; Zhao, Q, 2022
)
2.44
" Pioglitazone combined with atorvastatin can further restrain the progression of atherosclerosis and promote plaque stabilization in a rabbit model."( Pioglitazone combined with atorvastatin promotes plaque stabilization in a rabbit model.
Chen, X; Liang, Z; Nie, M; Yan, Y; Zhang, X; Zhao, Q, 2022
)
3.07

Bioavailability

Quercetin may influence the bioavailability of pioglitazone, which could be particularly crucial, as any increment in its plasma levels may raise safety concerns. Particle size, flowability, compactibility, packability, solubility, dissolution rate and bioavailability were advantageously improved compared with raw crystalline piog litazone hydroc.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" After oral dosing, pioglitazone was well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract at an extent of 96, 95, and 90% in rats, dogs, and monkeys, respectively."( Disposition of the new antidiabetic agent pioglitazone in rats, dogs, and monkeys.
Kiyota, Y; Maeshiba, Y; Motohashi, M; Tanayama, S; Yamashita, K; Yoshimura, Y, 1997
)
0.88
" Despite breaking all the "rule of five" criteria, the dimers had excellent oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties, resulting in good in vivo efficacy in db/db mice."( Large dimeric ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity in vitro and in vivo.
Albrektsen, T; Bury, PS; Deussen, HJ; Din, N; Fleckner, J; Frederiksen, KS; Jeppesen, L; Mogensen, JP; Nehlin, J; Pettersson, I; Sauerberg, P; Svensson, LA; Wulff, EM; Ynddal, L, 2003
)
0.32
" Bioequivalence, based on absorption and bioavailability parameters, has been established between the fixed-dose tablets and equivalent doses of pioglitazone and metformin coadministered as separate agents."( Pioglitazone/metformin.
Deeks, ED; Scott, LJ, 2006
)
1.98
" Hence, it was speculated that quercetin may influence the bioavailability of pioglitazone, which could be particularly crucial, as any increment in its plasma levels may raise safety concerns."( Quercetin pretreatment increases the bioavailability of pioglitazone in rats: involvement of CYP3A inhibition.
Bansod, KU; Dixit, PV; Kumar, V; Umathe, SN; Wanjari, MM, 2008
)
0.82
"Recently, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) ligands have been reported to increase nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability in vitro but not in vivo because of the difficulty of measuring plasma NO."( Effects of pioglitazone on nitric oxide bioavailability measured using a catheter-type nitric oxide sensor in angiotensin II-infusion rabbit.
Akasaka, T; Goto, M; Ikejima, H; Imanishi, T; Kobayashi, K; Kuroi, A; Mochizuki, S; Yoshida, K, 2008
)
0.74
"We examined whether nitroglycerin (NTG)-induced impairment of nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability could be modified by a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gammaagonist."( Effect of pioglitazone on nitroglycerin-induced impairment of nitric oxide bioavailability by a catheter-type nitric oxide sensor.
Akasaka, T; Goto, M; Ikejima, H; Imanishi, T; Kuroi, A; Mochizuki, S; Muragaki, Y; Tsujioka, H; Yoshida, K, 2008
)
0.75
" In conclusion, pioglitazone significantly enhanced the oral bioavailability of nicardipine in rats by reducing its presystemic clearance."( Reduced prehepatic extraction of nicardipine in the presence of pioglitazone in rats.
Choi, DH; Choi, JS; Chung, JH; Han, HK; Koh, YY, 2008
)
0.93
"Pioglitazone improved endothelial function in hypertensive patients with IGT through an increase in nitric oxide bioavailability by, in part, a decrease in oxidative stress."( Pioglitazone improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in hypertensive patients with impaired glucose tolerance in part through a decrease in oxidative stress.
Chayama, K; Fujii, Y; Fujimura, N; Goto, C; Hata, T; Hidaka, T; Higashi, Y; Idei, N; Kihara, Y; Nakagawa, K; Soga, J, 2010
)
3.25
"The purpose of the present research was to develop bioadhesive buccal tablets for Felodipine (FDP) and Pioglitazone (PIO), low bioavailability drugs, in a combined dosage form for the management of diabetes and hypertension."( Development of bioadhesive buccal tablets for felodipine and pioglitazone in combined dosage form: in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo characterization.
Gannu, R; Palem, CR; Yamsani, MR; Yamsani, SK; Yamsani, VV, 2011
)
0.83
"6 nM) with partial PPARγ agonism (EC(50) = 212 nM, 31% max) and oral bioavailability in rat."( Discovery of a series of imidazo[4,5-b]pyridines with dual activity at angiotensin II type 1 receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ.
Bigge, CF; Casimiro-Garcia, A; Chen, J; Davis, JA; Dudley, DA; Edmunds, JJ; Ellis, T; Esmaeil, N; Filzen, GF; Flynn, D; Geyer, A; Heemstra, RJ; Jalaie, M; Ohren, JF; Ostroski, R; Schaum, RP; Stoner, C, 2011
)
0.37
"5h and bioavailability of 85%."( NS-1: a novel partial peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonist to improve insulin sensitivity and metabolic profile.
Chaudhary, S; Dube, A; Kothari, V; Sachan, N; Upasani, CD, 2012
)
0.38
" Particle size, flowability, compactibility, packability, solubility, dissolution rate and bioavailability of plain agglomerates and agglomerates with additives (except with polyvinyl pyrrolidone) were advantageously improved compared with raw crystalline pioglitazone hydrochloride."( Improved compressibility, flowability, dissolution and bioavailability of pioglitazone hydrochloride by emulsion solvent diffusion with additives.
Patil, SV; Pawar, AP; Sahoo, SK, 2012
)
0.79
"Low aqueous solubility is often a limiting aspect to the bioavailability of poorly soluble, but highly permeable drugs (class II compounds according to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System - BCS) administered in single drug products or as fixed dose combinations."( New formulation approaches to improve solubility and drug release from fixed dose combinations: case examples pioglitazone/glimepiride and ezetimibe/simvastatin.
Dressman, JB; Klein, S; Taupitz, T, 2013
)
0.6
"Amorphous forms of crystalline drug are widely utilized for bioavailability enhancement of low solubility drugs in the pharmaceutical industry."( Effect of polymers and media type on extending the dissolution of amorphous pioglitazone and inhibiting the recrystallization from a supersaturated state.
Shi, NQ; Wang, XL; Yao, J, 2014
)
0.63
"Alogliptin is a selective, orally bioavailable inhibitor of the enzymatic activity of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4)."( Alogliptin: A new dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Erowele, G; Ndefo, UA; Okoli, O, 2014
)
0.4
" The objective of this Phase 2 proof-of-concept study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of JNJ-41443532, an orally bioavailable CCR2 antagonist, in patients with T2DM."( CCR2 antagonism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.
Andrade-Gordon, P; Artis, E; Di Prospero, NA; Johnson, DL; Rothenberg, P; Vaccaro, N; Xi, L, 2014
)
0.4
" The aim of this study was to design PZ-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) to investigate the bioavailability improvement by transdermal delivery."( Nanostructured lipid carriers of pioglitazone for transdermal application: from experimental design to bioactivity detail.
Alam, S; Ali, A; Aqil, M; Aslam, M; Imam, SS; Khan, A; Sultana, Y, 2016
)
0.72
"Owing to the complementary mechanisms of action of metformin hydrochloride (MH) and pioglitazone hydrochloride (PG), combination therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus using the two drugs is highly desired; on the other hand, MH is not well absorbed in lower gastrointestinal tract and has a short half-life, therefore compromising the therapeutic effects."( Gastro-floating bilayer tablets for the sustained release of metformin and immediate release of pioglitazone: preparation and in vitro/in vivo evaluation.
He, W; Li, Y; Wu, Z; Yin, L; Zhang, R, 2014
)
0.85
" Consequently, the absolute bioavailability (AB) of nifedipine in the presence of pioglitazone (1."( Effects of pioglitazone on the pharmacokinetics of nifedipine and its main metabolite, dehydronifedipine, in rats.
Choi, DH; Choi, I; Choi, JS, 2016
)
1.05
" SC bioavailability of hIgG in all animal groups was similar (>84%)."( Effect of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Nephropathy on IgG Pharmacokinetics and Subcutaneous Bioavailability in the Rat.
Chadha, GS; Morris, ME, 2015
)
0.42
"Cinnamon enhanced the bioavailability of pioglitazone by inhibiting the CYP3A4 enzyme."( Effect of Cinnamomum cassia on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Pioglitazone.
Koganti, B; Koganti, VSRGP; Mamindla, S; Ravouru, N, 2017
)
0.95
" Crystallization improves solubility, and bioavailability by increasing the surface area of slightly water soluble drugs."( Nanocrystalization of Pioglitazone by Precipitation Method.
Ahmadipour, S; Tabbakhian, M; Varshosaz, J, 2018
)
0.8
"The study was aimed to improve the dissolution and bioavailability of developed stable amorphous solid dispersions (SDs) of pioglitazone hydrochloride (PGH), a poorly water-soluble drug."( Effect of semicrystalline copolymers in solid dispersions of pioglitazone hydrochloride: in vitro-in vivo correlation.
Subudhi, BB; Swain, RP, 2019
)
0.96
" Level A correlation demonstrated between in vitro release and bioavailability of PGH, suggest its biowaiver potential."( Effect of semicrystalline copolymers in solid dispersions of pioglitazone hydrochloride: in vitro-in vivo correlation.
Subudhi, BB; Swain, RP, 2019
)
0.76
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
" Most remarkably, bioavailability of NAT has been increased markedly on coadministration with PIO, than when it was administered alone."( Simultaneous Pharmacokinetics Estimation of Nateglinide and Pioglitazone by RP-HPLC: Computational Study to Unlock the Synergism.
Alam, SP; Basak, S; De, A; Dey, S; Ghosh, M; Hossain, T; Karmakar, T; Saha, A, 2020
)
0.8
"Co-administration of PIO with caffeine enhances its antidiabetic effect, probably due to enhanced bioavailability of PIO, leading to clinical benefits in diabetic patients."( Caffeine modulates pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of pioglitazone in diabetic rats: Impact on therapeutics.
Alkahtani, SA; Alshabi, AM; Habeeb, MS; Shaikh, IA, 2021
)
0.86
" Consequently, the variation in metabolism alters the bioavailability of pioglitazone and the expected final effect."( Arsenic: A Perspective on Its Effect on Pioglitazone Bioavailability.
Camacho-Luis, A; López-Guzmán, OD; Nieto-Delgado, G; Ponce-Peña, P; Pozos-Guillén, AJ; Salas-Pacheco, JM; Terrones-Gurrola, MCDR; Vértiz-Hernández, AA, 2023
)
1.41
"CAP, PGZ, and combination treatment nano-formulations were prepared by triblock (TB) (PCL-PEG-PCL) biodegradable copolymers to enhance drugs' bioavailability as anti-cancer agents."( Combination chemotherapy against colorectal cancer cells: Co-delivery of capecitabine and pioglitazone hydrochloride by polycaprolactone-polyethylene glycol carriers.
Fathi-Azarbayjani, A; Kheradmand, F; Pouya, FD; Rasmi, Y; Salehi, R, 2023
)
1.13

Dosage Studied

The hydroxylated M-VII was detected in incubations with rat, dog and human liver and kidney microsomes. Guinea pigs treated with the highest dosage of pioglitazone demonstrated a significant reduction in the levels of both MMP-13 and IL-1beta in OA cartilage.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Metabolites 6-9 have been identified after dosing of rats and dogs."( Synthesis and biological activity of metabolites of the antidiabetic, antihyperglycemic agent pioglitazone.
Colca, JR; Fisher, RM; Kletzein, RF; Parker, TT; Tanis, SP, 1996
)
0.51
"Two randomized, two-period crossover studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of repeat oral dosing of troglitazone (Study I) and pioglitazone (Study II) on the pharmacokinetics of plasma HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors following multiple oral doses of simvastatin and of simvastatin on the plasma pharmacokinetics of troglitazone (Study I) in healthy subjects."( Interactions between simvastatin and troglitazone or pioglitazone in healthy subjects.
Amin, RD; Dilzer, S; Gagliano, K; Kuznetsova, O; Lasseter, KC; Liu, L; Musser, B; Prueksaritanont, T; Roadcap, BA; Rogers, JD; Vega, JM; Zhao, J, 2001
)
0.76
"To investigate the dose-response effects of pioglitazone on glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes."( Dose-response effect of pioglitazone on insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes.
DeFronzo, RA; Matsuda, M; Miyazaki, Y, 2002
)
0.88
" The prandial glucose regulator repaglinide has been studied in combination with metformin (an inhibitor of hepatic glucose production), neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH)-insulin (which has a long duration of effect, but at the risk of early hypoglycaemia and late hyperglycaemia in the dosing interval) and three thiazolidinediones (TZDs--troglitazone, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, which stimulate nuclear receptors to increase insulin sensitivity and reduce insulin resistance) in patients whose diabetes was inadequately controlled by previous monotherapy or combination therapy."( Repaglinide in combination therapy.
Moses, R, 2002
)
0.48
" The hydroxylated M-VII was detected in incubations with rat, dog and human liver and kidney microsomes, and in plasma from rats and dogs dosed orally with [(3)H]pioglitazone."( Identification of novel metabolites of pioglitazone in rat and dog.
Bakhtiar, R; Creighton, M; Feeney, W; Franklin, RB; Hora, DF; Liu, DQ; Reed, JR; Shen, Z; Szewczyk, J; Tang, YS; Vincent, SH, 2003
)
0.78
" The idea of angiostatic therapy following the paradigm of metronomic dosed chemotherapeutics combined with proapoptotic biomodulators had not been considered previously in these patients."( Antiangiogenetic therapy with pioglitazone, rofecoxib, and metronomic trofosfamide in patients with advanced malignant vascular tumors.
Andreesen, R; Bataille, F; Berand, A; Bross, K; Hafner, C; Jauch, KW; Landthaler, M; Reichle, A; Vogt, T, 2003
)
0.61
" Then the rats were divided into 3 groups of 9 rats: PPAR-gamma ligand 15-deoxy-(12,14)-PGJ(2) (15d-PGJ(2)) group (15d-PGJ(2) was injected intraperitoneally at the dosage of 200 microg."( [Peroxisome proliferation-activated receptor-gamma ligands ameliorate autoimmune myocarditis associated with inhibition of T cell immunity].
Kishimoto, C; Liu, Y; Liu, ZQ; Yuan, ZY; Zhang, JJ, 2003
)
0.32
" Drug exposure remains almost constant across a wide range of renal function since there is no accumulation of the drug or its active metabolites during repeated dosing in renal insufficiency."( Treating type 2 diabetes in renal insufficiency: the role of pioglitazone.
Budde, K; Diekmann, F; Einecke, G; Fritsche, L; Glander, P; Neumayer, HH; Schötschel, R, 2003
)
0.56
" Pioglitazone dosage was fixed at 30 mg per day."( Treatment of type 2 diabetes with a combination regimen of repaglinide plus pioglitazone.
Gooch, B; Greco, S; Hale, PM; Hassman, DR; Jain, R; Jovanovic, L; Khutoryansky, N, 2004
)
1.46
" Each of the lower dosages was given for at least 4 weeks and the highest dosage for 16 weeks."( Pioglitazone is effective therapy for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Khan, M; Murray, FT; Perez, A; Rajagopalan, R; Ye, Z, 2004
)
1.77
" Sensitivity analyses undertaken by the assessment team suggest that the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of rosiglitazone is most sensitive to dosage and treatment effect, that is, the effect of rosiglitazone on beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity."( Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Beverley, C; Chilcott, J; Cowan, J; Czoski-Murray, C; Psyllaki, MA; Warren, E, 2004
)
0.58
" No published economic studies on either pioglitazone or rosiglitazone were found, although sensitivity analyses undertaken by the assessment team suggest that the cost per QALY of rosiglitazone is most sensitive to dosage and treatment effect."( Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Beverley, C; Chilcott, J; Cowan, J; Czoski-Murray, C; Psyllaki, MA; Warren, E, 2004
)
0.84
" Guinea pigs treated with the highest dosage of pioglitazone demonstrated a significant reduction in the levels of both MMP-13 and IL-1beta in OA cartilage."( Pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist, reduces the progression of experimental osteoarthritis in guinea pigs.
Kobayashi, T; Martel-Pelletier, J; Naito, T; Nakamura, A; Notoya, K; Pelletier, JP; Unno, S, 2005
)
2.03
" Thoracic aorta was isolated and the dose-response curve of phenylephrine (PE) in the presence or absence of Nomega-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester (L-NAME) was recorded."( Pioglitazone, a PPARgamma agonist, restores endothelial function in aorta of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.
Balaraman, R; Majithiya, JB; Paramar, AN, 2005
)
1.77
" The presence of pioglitazone at higher concentrations (>10 muM), but not at lower concentrations, significantly changed the dose-response curve of PE or Ach."( Pioglitazone, a PPARgamma agonist, restores endothelial function in aorta of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.
Balaraman, R; Majithiya, JB; Paramar, AN, 2005
)
2.11
"Two simple and accurate methods of analysis to determine pioglitazone hydrochloride (PIO) and mefformin hydrochloride (MET) in combined dosage forms were developed using second-derivative spectrophotometry and reversed-phase liquid chromatography (LC)."( Estimation of pioglitazone hydrochloride and metformin hydrochloride in tablets by derivative spectrophotometry and liquid chromatographic methods.
Bhatt, KK; Geetha, M; Mehta, RS; Modi, VD; Patel, BJ; Shah, DA; Shankar, MB,
)
0.74
" The sustained total serum concentration of active compounds during multiple dosing provides the basis for once-daily dose administration of pioglitazone in adolescents."( Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone in adolescents with type 2 diabetes.
Burghen, GA; Capparelli, EV; Christensen, ML; Meibohm, B; Tamborlane, WV; Velasquez-Mieyer, P, 2005
)
0.79
" Careful blood glucose monitoring and dosage adjustments are suggested during coadministration of pioglitazone and gemfibrozil."( Effect of gemfibrozil on the pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone.
Deng, LJ; Li, HD; Wang, F, 2005
)
0.8
" Insulin dosage also decreased significantly (-4."( Addition of pioglitazone to stable insulin therapy in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: results of a double-blind, multicentre, randomized study.
Davidson, JA; Perez, A; Zhang, J, 2006
)
0.71
" Pioglitazone and metformin are well tolerated in combination, with low rates of hypoglycemia, and the convenience of a single tablet may be expected to aid dosing compliance."( A fixed-dose combination of pioglitazone and metformin: A promising alternative in metabolic control.
Seufert, J, 2006
)
1.54
" In a post hoc meta-analysis of combined data from the 2 studies (n = 124), there was considerable overlapping in AUC(infinity) values between gender and race (Caucasians, Blacks, and Hispanics), making neither gender- nor racial-based dosing of pioglitazone or metformin necessary."( Oral antidiabetic drugs: bioavailability assessment of fixed-dose combination tablets of pioglitazone and metformin. Effect of body weight, gender, and race on systemic exposures of each drug.
Bradford, D; Cao, C; Karim, A; Laurent, A; Schwartz, L; Slater, M; Zhao, Z, 2007
)
0.74
" However, in the absence of clinical data, it is prudent to reduce the dosage of each glitazone by half in patients treated with gemfibrozil."( Pharmacokinetic interactions with thiazolidinediones.
Scheen, AJ, 2007
)
0.34
"Eight prenatally androgenized (PA) and 5 control female rhesus monkeys of similar age, body weight and body mass index received an oral placebo daily for 6-7 months followed, after at least 90 days, by daily oral dosing with pioglitazone (3mg/kg) for an additional 6-7 months."( Pioglitazone improves insulin action and normalizes menstrual cycles in a majority of prenatally androgenized female rhesus monkeys.
Abbott, DH; Bird, IM; Bruns, CM; Dumesic, DA; Goodfriend, TL; Kemnitz, JW; Zhou, R,
)
1.76
"Cultured rat HSCs were divided into a no-treatment control group, a TGF b-treated group, and a TGFb plus different dosage pioglitazone-treated group."( [Effects of pioglitazone on the morphology and the expression of connective tissue growth factor of transforming growth factor beta-induced rat hepatic stellate cells in vitro].
Chen, WH; Jia, JB; Liu, M; Liu, Y; Lu, LG, 2007
)
0.93
" There was considerable overlapping in the AUC(infinity) values, making gender-dependent dosing unnecessary."( Replicate study design in bioequivalency assessment, pros and cons: bioavailabilities of the antidiabetic drugs pioglitazone and glimepiride present in a fixed-dose combination formulation.
Bradford, D; Karim, A; Laurent, A; Schuster, J; Slater, M; Zhao, Z, 2007
)
0.55
"The aim of this randomized placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pioglitazone administered alone or in combination with metformin in reducing insulin dosage requirements for improved glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes previously poorly controlled with combination therapy."( Effect of pioglitazone in combination with insulin therapy on glycaemic control, insulin dose requirement and lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes previously poorly controlled with combination therapy.
Berhanu, P; Perez, A; Yu, S, 2007
)
0.96
"Evidence gathered from the ipGTT and ICT tests suggests that the SX-fraction of Maitake in a proper dosage as well as pioglitazone enhance insulin sensitivity."( Enhanced insulin-hypoglycemic activity in rats consuming a specific glycoprotein extracted from maitake mushroom.
Bagchi, D; Echard, B; Perricone, NV; Preuss, HG; Zhuang, C, 2007
)
0.55
" The mean therapeutic dosage of insulin glargine in group A was 14."( Therapeutic options for elderly diabetic subjects: open label, randomized clinical trial of insulin glargine added to oral antidiabetic drugs versus increased dosage of oral antidiabetic drugs.
Alagona, C; Chiavetta, A; Fedele, V; Leotta, C; Lorenti, I; Luca, S; Papa, G; Pezzino, V; Piro, S; Purrello, F; Rabuazzo, AM; Spadaro, L, 2008
)
0.35
" Sixteen male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly distributed into four groups, and dosed daily for 14 days by oral gavage with 0, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg/day PIO."( Assessment of genotoxicity in rats treated with the antidiabetic agent, pioglitazone.
Aliyazicioglu, Y; Alvur, M; Bedir, A; Bilgici, B; Hökelek, M; Kahraman, H; Okuyucu, A; Suvaci, DE; Uysal, M; Yurdakul, Z, 2008
)
0.58
"A simple, precise, rapid, and reproducible reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography method is developed for the simultaneous estimation of metformin hydrochloride (MET), pioglitazone hydrochloride (PIO), and glimepiride (GLP) present in multicomponent dosage forms."( Simultaneous estimation of metformin hydrochloride, pioglitazone hydrochloride, and glimepiride by RP-HPLC in tablet formulation.
Amin, M; Jain, D; Jain, S, 2008
)
0.79
" The purpose of our study was to investigate the effect of pioglitazone on systemic inflammatory markers and activation of circulating monocytes in type 2 diabetic patients through the dosage of IL-6."( Pioglitazone reduces monocyte activation in type 2 diabetes.
Biasucci, LM; Buffon, A; Crea, F; Di Stasio, E; Ghirlanda, G; Giubilato, S; Liuzzo, G; Pitocco, D; Zaccardi, F, 2009
)
2.04
"A simple, fast, and precise reverse phase, isocratic HPLC method was developed for the separation and quantification of pioglitazone and glimepiride in bulk drug and pharmaceutical dosage form."( Simultaneous determination of pioglitazone and glimepiride in bulk drug and pharmaceutical dosage form by RP-HPLC method.
A, K; A, R; Bhat, K; C, MR; G, S; K, K; M, S; N, U; P, M, 2008
)
0.84
" Animals were fed a fat-enriched (54% kcal fat) diet for 6 weeks, 2 weeks high of fat-exposure alone followed by a 4-week dosing period."( Effects of cevoglitazar, a dual PPARalpha/gamma agonist, on ectopic fat deposition in fatty Zucker rats.
Boettcher, BR; Gao, J; Gounarides, JS; Laurent, D, 2009
)
0.35
"Five hundred and seventy-six consecutive Caucasian obese type 2 diabetic patients were evaluated during a 12-months period and fifty-two patients were resulted intolerant to metformin at maximum dosage (3,000 mg/day)."( Pioglitazone metabolic effect in metformin-intolerant obese patients treated with sibutramine.
Ciccarelli, L; Cicero, AF; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Ferrari, I; Gravina, A; Maffioli, P; Mereu, R; Piccinni, MN; Salvadeo, SA, 2009
)
1.8
" In a well-characterized cell culture model of the principal cell type [Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK)-C7], PPARgamma agonists inhibit vasopressin-stimulated Cl(-) secretion with agonist dose-response relationships that mirror receptor transactivation profiles."( PPARgamma agonists inhibit vasopressin-mediated anion transport in the MDCK-C7 cell line.
Ashton, TT; Baines, D; Bisi, J; Blazer-Yost, BL; Brown, KK; Harrington, W; Kalsi, K; Maurio, FP; Murray, D; Nofziger, C; Smith, CD; West, TA, 2009
)
0.35
" In a nonrandomized, single-sequence study (study II), participants (n = 24 completed) received a single 5-mg dose of the sulfonylurea glyburide, alone and after 8 days of dosing with alogliptin 25 mg qd."( Coadministration of pioglitazone or glyburide and alogliptin: pharmacokinetic drug interaction assessment in healthy participants.
Fleck, P; Karim, A; Laurent, A; Mekki, Q; Munsaka, M; Wann, E, 2009
)
0.68
" Seventeen adult male cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) were studied in a Latin square design such that all animals received 0, 1, 2, and 5 mg/kg pioglitazone for 6 weeks with 2 weeks of washout between dosing intervals."( Fluid compartmental shifts with efficacious pioglitazone therapy in overweight monkeys: implications for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist use in prediabetes.
Berquist, ML; Brown, KK; Kavanagh, K; Wagner, JD; Zhang, L, 2010
)
0.82
" Translation of these findings into clinical therapy will require careful assessment of dosing paradigms and effective time windows for treatment."( Extension of the neuroprotective time window for thiazolidinediones in ischemic stroke is dependent on time of reperfusion.
Blankenship, DA; Gamboa, J; Hilow, E; Karl, M; Landreth, GE; Niemi, JP; Sundararajan, S, 2010
)
0.36
" Average increases in insulin dosage with exenatide and placebo were 13 U/d and 20 U/d."( Use of twice-daily exenatide in Basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial.
Bergenstal, RM; Buse, JB; Glass, LC; Heilmann, CR; Hoogwerf, BJ; Kwan, AY; Lewis, MS; Rosenstock, J, 2011
)
0.37
" Thus, the proposed method is simple and suitable for the simultaneous analysis of active ingredients in dosage forms and human serum."( Simultaneous determination of gliquidone, pioglitazone hydrochloride, and verapamil in formulation and human serum by RP-HPLC.
Arayne, MS; Mirza, AZ; Sultana, N, 2011
)
0.63
"The purpose of the present research was to develop bioadhesive buccal tablets for Felodipine (FDP) and Pioglitazone (PIO), low bioavailability drugs, in a combined dosage form for the management of diabetes and hypertension."( Development of bioadhesive buccal tablets for felodipine and pioglitazone in combined dosage form: in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo characterization.
Gannu, R; Palem, CR; Yamsani, MR; Yamsani, SK; Yamsani, VV, 2011
)
0.83
" We proposed a systematic classification scheme using FDA-approved drug labeling to assess the DILI potential of drugs, which yielded a benchmark dataset with 287 drugs representing a wide range of therapeutic categories and daily dosage amounts."( FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
Chen, M; Fang, H; Liu, Z; Shi, Q; Tong, W; Vijay, V, 2011
)
0.37
" Patients had an option to continue in a 40-week, open-label extension study, with those originally randomized to alogliptin remaining on the same dosage regimen while patients treated with placebo were randomly allocated to alogliptin 12."( Efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to pioglitazone in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label long-term extension study.
Hirayama, M; Hiroi, S; Itayasu, T; Kaku, K; Seino, Y, 2011
)
0.63
" Phenylephrine, ACh, and SNP dose-response curves were impaired to different extents in arteries of SHROBs."( Reactivity of the aorta and mesenteric resistance arteries from the obese spontaneously hypertensive rat: effects of glitazones.
Llorens, S; Mendizábal, Y; Nava, E, 2011
)
0.37
" VSMCs were treated in a dose-response manner with insulin (0, 1, 10, and 100 nM) for 20 min, and Akt and Erk phosphorylation were measured by Western blot analysis."( Potential role of insulin signaling on vascular smooth muscle cell migration, proliferation, and inflammation pathways.
Cersosimo, E; Musi, N; Xu, X, 2012
)
0.38
" We evaluated the inductive effect of rifampicin (RIF), a typical human PXR ligand, on the plasma exposure to the four P450 substrate drugs (triazolam/CYP3A4, pioglitazone/CYP2C8, (S)-warfarin/CYP2C9, and (S)-(-)-mephenytoin/CYP2C19) by cassette dosing in PXB mice."( Investigation of drug-drug interactions caused by human pregnane X receptor-mediated induction of CYP3A4 and CYP2C subfamilies in chimeric mice with a humanized liver.
Hasegawa, M; Inoue, R; Kakuni, M; Tahara, H; Tateno, C; Ushiki, J, 2012
)
0.58
"Few studies have given suggestions on appropriate initiation insulin dosage when combined with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs)."( Appropriate insulin initiation dosage for insulin-naive type 2 diabetes outpatients receiving insulin monotherapy or in combination with metformin and/or pioglitazone.
Dong, JJ; Liao, L; Mou, YR; Qiu, LL; Yang, M; Zhao, JJ, 2010
)
0.56
"0%, treated with stable dosage of a sulphonylurea for at least 30 days previously, were randomized to receive placebo or pioglitazone 30 mg once daily for 16 weeks."( [A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel and multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pioglitazone with sulphonylurea in type 2 diabetic patients].
Gao, Y; Guo, LX; Jia, PH; Liu, ZM; Lu, JM; Lü, ZH; Ning, G; Pan, CY; Sun, SY; Wang, XX; Zheng, JY, 2011
)
0.79
"The 16-week clinical study demonstrated that pioglitazone hydrochloride with a dosage of 30mg daily, could significantly improve the blood glucose control and enhance the insulin sensitivity, lower triglyceride and raise HDL-C level as an additional therapy to a stable-dose sulphonylurea in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients previously poorly controlled by single sulphonylurea therapy, and furthermore had good safety and compliance."( [A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel and multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pioglitazone with sulphonylurea in type 2 diabetic patients].
Gao, Y; Guo, LX; Jia, PH; Liu, ZM; Lu, JM; Lü, ZH; Ning, G; Pan, CY; Sun, SY; Wang, XX; Zheng, JY, 2011
)
0.84
"To assess the 54-week efficacy of initial combination therapy with sitagliptin and pioglitazone, compared with pioglitazone monotherapy, and to assess safety in these groups during the 30 weeks after the dosage of pioglitazone was increased from 30 to 45 mg/day, in drug-naÏve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycaemic control [haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 8-12%]."( Efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with sitagliptin and pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 54-week study.
Goldstein, BJ; Golm, GT; Kaufman, KD; Lee, M; O'Neill, EA; Steinberg, H; Teng, R; Yoon, KH, 2012
)
0.84
" A comprehensive, 12-concentration dose-response analysis using a cell-based assay showed aleglitazar to be highly potent, with EC(50) values of 5 nM and 9 nM for PPARα and PPARγ, respectively."( Comparative molecular profiling of the PPARα/γ activator aleglitazar: PPAR selectivity, activity and interaction with cofactors.
Benz, J; Dietz, M; Grether, U; Hartman, P; Kuhn, B; Maerki, HP; Mohr, P; Ruf, A; Wright, MB, 2012
)
0.38
" Primary endpoints were the area under the curve from the time of dosing to infinity (AUC(inf)) and the maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)) of each drug."( No pharmacokinetic interaction between ipragliflozin and sitagliptin, pioglitazone, or glimepiride in healthy subjects.
Kadokura, T; Keirns, J; Krauwinkel, WJ; Smulders, RA; van Dijk, J; Veltkamp, SA; Zhang, W, 2012
)
0.61
"45) and in those with a cumulative dosage greater than 28,000 mg (2."( The use of pioglitazone and the risk of bladder cancer in people with type 2 diabetes: nested case-control study.
Assayag, J; Azoulay, L; Filion, KB; Majdan, A; Pollak, MN; Suissa, S; Yin, H, 2012
)
0.77
" After being fed a high-fat diet for two weeks, rats were dosed orally with emodin (20, 40, 80 mg/kg/day) or pioglitazone (20 mg/kg/day), once daily for eight weeks."( Emodin protects against high-fat diet-induced obesity via regulation of AMP-activated protein kinase pathways in white adipose tissue.
Chang, CJ; Liou, SS; Liu, IM; Lu, HJ; Tzeng, TF, 2012
)
0.59
" Patients were on a stable dosage of TZD (rosiglitazone or pioglitazone) and, if applicable, metformin."( Safety of exenatide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with a thiazolidinedione alone or in combination with metformin for 2 years.
Boardman, MK; Haber, H; Liutkus, JF; Norwood, P; Pintilei, E; Trautmann, ME, 2012
)
0.62
" To achieve a significant antineoplastic effect, pio needed to be dosed at 240 PPM in the oral group and >1 μM when delivered intracerebrally."( The PPARγ agonist pioglitazone crosses the blood-brain barrier and reduces tumor growth in a human xenograft model.
Blankenship, D; Caprariello, A; Dechant, A; Grommes, C; Karlo, JC; Landreth, GE, 2013
)
0.72
" In the dose-response analyses, none of the categories showed a significant hazard ratio, and all P-trends were >0."( Pioglitazone does not affect the risk of ovarian cancer: analysis of a nationwide reimbursement database in Taiwan.
Tseng, CH, 2013
)
1.83
" Dose-response effects were evaluated by comparing the incidence rates among patients with different cumulative exposures to TZD."( Risk of stroke with thiazolidinediones: a ten-year nationwide population-based cohort study.
Chen, PC; Chen, RC; Hsu, CY; Lu, CJ; Muo, CH; Sun, Y, 2013
)
0.39
" The results also showed a significant dose-dependent effect of higher risk of ischemic stroke with increasing dosage of rosiglitazone, while there was no increased risk at any level of pioglitazone dosage."( Risk of stroke with thiazolidinediones: a ten-year nationwide population-based cohort study.
Chen, PC; Chen, RC; Hsu, CY; Lu, CJ; Muo, CH; Sun, Y, 2013
)
0.58
" However, since the inhibition of transporter is not specific to cancer cells, a decrease in the cytotoxic drug dosing may be needed to prevent excess toxicity, thus undermining the potential benefit brought about by a drug efflux inhibitor."( Targeting the ABCG2-overexpressing multidrug resistant (MDR) cancer cells by PPARγ agonists.
To, KK; Tomlinson, B, 2013
)
0.39
" Additionally, the analyses addressing increasing exposure to pioglitazone observed a dose-response relation between exclusive ever use of pioglitazone and bladder cancer in terms of cumulative duration of use and cumulative dosage."( Pioglitazone prescription increases risk of bladder cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes: an updated meta-analysis.
He, S; Tang, YH; Wang, D; Yang, X; Zhang, Y; Zhao, G, 2014
)
2.09
"Co-administration of probe substrates midazolam, pioglitazone, omeprazole, and rosuvastatin following repeat dosing of vercirnon 500 mg BID demonstrated vercirnon had no clinically significant effect on CYP3A4, CYP2C8, CYP2C19 enzyme activity or BCRP or OATP1B1 transporter activity."( Effects of vercirnon on the activity of CYP3A4, CYP2C19 and CYP2C8 enzymes and BCRP and OATP1B1 transporters using probe substrates.
Cargill, A; Haberer, LJ; McCarthy, L; McSherry, I, 2014
)
0.66
" Insulin dosage and weight-gain were similar."( Randomized, 1-year comparison of three ways to initiate and advance insulin for type 2 diabetes: twice-daily premixed insulin versus basal insulin with either basal-plus one prandial insulin or basal-bolus up to three prandial injections.
Gao, L; Riddle, MC; Rosenstock, J; Vlajnic, A, 2014
)
0.4
" The proposed method can be used for simultaneous estimation of these drugs in marketed dosage forms."( RP-HPLC method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of atorvastatin calcium and pioglitazone hydrochloride in pharmaceutical dosage form.
Ammineni, P; Kondreddy, Vk; Mallikarjuna, S; Peraman, R, 2014
)
0.62
" Although significant P-trends for the dose-response parameters could be observed in some of the unadjusted and age-sex-adjusted models, none was significant in the multivariable-adjusted models."( Pioglitazone and oral cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Tseng, CH, 2014
)
1.85
" Alogliptin does not require any dosage adjustment when coadministered with ketoconazole, fluconazole, gemfibrozil, warfarin, metformin, glyburide, and pioglitazone."( Alogliptin: A new dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Erowele, G; Ndefo, UA; Okoli, O, 2014
)
0.6
" Pioglitazone dosing protected TH-positive neurons, closely matching the number of PPAR-gamma expressing cells in the ipsilateral SNpc."( Expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma in the substantia nigra of hemiparkinsonian nonhuman primates.
Emborg, M; Swanson, C, 2014
)
1.31
" None of the dose-response parameters showed a significant trend of risk association, with all P-trends >0."( Pioglitazone does not affect the risk of kidney cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Tseng, CH, 2014
)
1.85
" Administration of pioglitazone also prevented morphine-induced 50 % effective dose (ED50) shift to the right in the dose-response curve and increased the global analgesic effect of morphine."( Pioglitazone prevents morphine antinociception tolerance and withdrawal symptoms in rats.
Azarfardian, A; Charkhpour, M; Ghasami, S; Ghavimi, H; Hassanzadeh, K; Maleki-Dizaji, N; Zolali, E, 2014
)
2.17
"Optimal dosing of basal insulin is needed to achieve target fasting blood glucose and to avoid hypoglycaemia on the other hand in patients of type 2 diabetes on bedtime basal insulin and daytime sulfonylureas."( Study of optimal basal insulin glargine dose requirement in Indian population as an add on therapy to oral hypoglycaemic agents to achieve target fasting blood glucose levels.
Agarwal, SK; Singh, BK; Wadhwa, R, 2013
)
0.39
" Dosages-dependent analysis revealed that protective effect of PIO ameliorated the physiopathological changes and reached a peak at dosage of 20 mg/kg/d."( Hydrochloride pioglitazone protects diabetic rats against podocyte injury through preserving glomerular podocalyxin expression.
Chen, Y; Hu, W; Xing, Y; Ye, S, 2014
)
0.76
" An analysis of variance was used to evaluate differences in pharmacokinetics with and without concomitant treatment; 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratio of the geometric least squares mean (LSM) estimates for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under concentration-time curve for dosing interval (AUC12 or AUC24), and oral clearance (CL/F) with and without concomitant treatment were used to assess a drug interaction."( Pharmacokinetic interactions between topiramate and pioglitazone and metformin.
Curtin, CR; Ford, L; Heald, D; Manitpisitkul, P; Shalayda, K; Wang, SS, 2014
)
0.65
" We observed a statistically significant trend in the RE dose-response relationship for change from baseline in HbA1c at week 12 (p < 0."( Randomized efficacy and safety trial of once-daily remogliflozin etabonate for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Almond, SR; Dobbins, R; Kemp, GL; Kler, L; O'Connor-Semmes, R; Sykes, AP; Walker, S; Wilkison, WO, 2015
)
0.42
" It is an attractive option because it is dosed once-weekly, provides A1C lowering similar to liraglutide, weight reduction similar to exenatide, and has an adverse effect profile similar to exenatide and liraglutide."( Dulaglutide: the newest GLP-1 receptor agonist for the management of type 2 diabetes.
Thompson, AM; Trujillo, JM, 2015
)
0.42
" We measured blood-oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) low-frequency fluctuations in conscious rats to map changes in brain resting-state functional connectivity due to daily, oral dosing with low-dose PIO."( Effects of low doses of pioglitazone on resting-state functional connectivity in conscious rat brain.
Asin, K; Crenshaw, DG; Gottschalk, WK; Liang, Z; Roses, AD; Zhang, N, 2015
)
0.72
" When mice were dosed with racemic pioglitazone, the concentration of (+)-pioglitazone was 46."( Influence of drug transporters and stereoselectivity on the brain penetration of pioglitazone as a potential medicine against Alzheimer's disease.
Chang, KL; Ho, PC; Pee, HN; Yang, S, 2015
)
0.92
" All animals were dosed with 1 mg/kg of hIgG intravenously (IV) or subcutaneously (SC)."( Effect of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Nephropathy on IgG Pharmacokinetics and Subcutaneous Bioavailability in the Rat.
Chadha, GS; Morris, ME, 2015
)
0.42
"The treatment of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus is diverse, with no clear consensus regarding the initial drug regimen or dosing to achieve optimal glycemic control."( Getting to goal in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes using combination drug "subtraction therapy".
George, TM; Jennings, AS; Jennings, JS; Lovett, AJ, 2015
)
0.42
" The geometric mean ratio (GMR) for pioglitazone Cmax at steady state (Cmax,ss) and for AUC during the dosing interval at steady state (AUCτ,ss) when coadministered with empagliflozin versus administration alone was 187."( Pharmacokinetics of Empagliflozin and Pioglitazone After Coadministration in Healthy Volunteers.
Broedl, UC; Macha, S; Mattheus, M; Pinnetti, S; Woerle, HJ, 2015
)
0.96
"During this investigation, nondependent prescription opioid abusers (N=17 completers) were maintained for 2-3weeks on ascending daily doses of PIO (0mg, 15mg, 45mg) prior to completing a laboratory session assessing the aforementioned effects of OXY [using a within-session cumulative dosing procedure (0, 10, and 20mg, cumulative dose=30mg)]."( The effects of pioglitazone, a PPARγ receptor agonist, on the abuse liability of oxycodone among nondependent opioid users.
Ciccocioppo, R; Comer, SD; Jones, JD; Manubay, JM; Metz, VE; Mogali, S; Sullivan, MA, 2016
)
0.79
" This approach will help formulation scientists detect and understand salt disproportionation and in situ drug-excipients compatibility issues in low dose solid dosage formulations."( Analytical approaches to investigate salt disproportionation in tablet matrices by Raman spectroscopy and Raman mapping.
Byrn, SR; Liu, Z; Marks, BC; Marsac, PJ; Nie, H; Taylor, LS, 2016
)
0.43
" Duration-response and dose-response relations were observed for pioglitazone but not for rosiglitazone."( Pioglitazone use and risk of bladder cancer: population based cohort study.
Azoulay, L; Filion, KB; Platt, RW; Tuccori, M; Yin, H; Yu, OH, 2016
)
2.11
" We conducted a dose-response meta-analysis to assess this association."( Association between pioglitazone use and the risk of bladder cancer among subjects with diabetes mellitus: a dose-response meta-analysis
.
Li, Z; Shi, J; Sun, M; Wang, F; Wang, K, 2017
)
0.78
" Pooled results derived from a random-effects model, and the dose-response analyses were conducted for the association between cumulative dose or duration of pioglitazone use and BC risk."( Association between pioglitazone use and the risk of bladder cancer among subjects with diabetes mellitus: a dose-response meta-analysis
.
Li, Z; Shi, J; Sun, M; Wang, F; Wang, K, 2017
)
0.98
" This sets the stage for dose-response and delayed administration studies to maximize pioglitazone's efficacy for SCI while elucidating the precise role that mitochondria play in governing its neuroprotection; the ultimate goal to develop novel therapeutics that specifically target mitochondrial dysfunction."( Pioglitazone treatment following spinal cord injury maintains acute mitochondrial integrity and increases chronic tissue sparing and functional recovery.
Bailey, WM; Cox, DH; Geldenhuys, WJ; Gensel, JC; Gollihue, JL; Patel, SP; Rabchevsky, AG; Sullivan, PG, 2017
)
2.12
" The proposed method is applicable for the analysis of six pharmaceutical dosage forms namely, Nesina®, Actos®, Glucophage®, Oseni®, Kazano® and Actoplus MET® tablets."( A guide for using experimental design in chromatographic method development: applied to the analysis of selected anti-diabetic pharmaceutical combinations.
Abdel-Aziz, O; Ayoub, BM, 2016
)
0.43
" A restricted spline regression analysis was used to examine the dose-response relationship with a generalized least-squares trend test."( Pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fu, S; Han, J; Shi, W; Song, Y; Tang, H; Wang, T; Zhai, S, 2018
)
1.92
" In the case of a solid oral dosage formulation containing the salt form of a weakly ionizable drug, excipient selection is critical, as some excipients are known to cause salt disproportionation (conversion of salt to the free form)."( Effect of excipient properties, water activity, and water content on the disproportionation of a pharmaceutical salt.
Arora, KK; Krzyzaniak, JF; Luthra, S; Patel, MA; Shamblin, SL; Taylor, LS, 2018
)
0.48
"Reliable methods for the characterization of drug substances are critical for evaluating stability and bioavailability, especially in dosage formulations under varying storage conditions and usage."( Quantifying Disproportionation in Pharmaceutical Formulations with
Hirsh, DA; Nie, H; Schurko, RW; Stueber, D; Su, Y; Variankaval, N; Xu, W, 2018
)
0.48
" Finally, oral administration of PGZ-SOL did not cause damage of buccal, sublingual and intestinal mucosae which suggests that this formulation is a viable alternative for AD treatment in geriatric populations with difficulty swallowing conventional solid dosage forms."( Thiazolidinedione as an alternative to facilitate oral administration in geriatric patients with Alzheimer's disease.
Calpena, AC; Espina, M; Espinoza, LC; García, ML; Gonzalez-Pizarro, R; Rodríguez-Lagunas, MJ; Silva-Abreu, M, 2019
)
0.51
" Co-supplementation of high dosage VD with spironolactone or pioglitazone are more effective in reducing plasma leptin levels than metformin, and thus might prove to be better therapeutic strategies for women with PCOS."( Differential Impact of Insulin Sensitizers vs. Anti-Androgen on Serum Leptin Levels in Vitamin D Replete PCOS Women: A Six Month Open Labeled Randomized Study.
Bhat, GA; Ganie, MA; Rashid, A; Shah, ZA; Shaheen, F; Shrivastava, M; Wani, IA, 2020
)
0.8
"Histopathological findings were correlated with the Western blot results and depict a protective effect corresponding to the elevated dosage of Pioglitazone regarding in situ perfusion rat model."( Effect of Pioglitazone on endoplasmic reticulum stress regarding in situ perfusion rat model.
Balogh, B; Caleb, I; Erlitz, L; Hardi, P; Jancsó, G; Nagy, T; Sétáló, G; Takács, I; Telek, V; Vecsernyés, M, 2021
)
1.22
"In our study, Pioglitazone can reduce the endoplasmic reticulum stress, and the most effective dosage proved to be the 40 mg/kg Pio referencing the kidney and liver samples."( Effect of Pioglitazone on endoplasmic reticulum stress regarding in situ perfusion rat model.
Balogh, B; Caleb, I; Erlitz, L; Hardi, P; Jancsó, G; Nagy, T; Sétáló, G; Takács, I; Telek, V; Vecsernyés, M, 2021
)
1.38
"One-year treatment with pioglitazone even at low dosage significantly improved liver steatosis and inflammation, systemic and adipose tissue insulin resistance in patients with T2D."( Pioglitazone even at low dosage improves NAFLD in type 2 diabetes: clinical and pathophysiological insights from a subgroup of the TOSCA.IT randomised trial.
Bozzetto, L; Carli, F; Della Pepa, G; Gastaldelli, A; Masulli, M; Riccardi, G; Rivellese, AA; Russo, M; Vaccaro, O; Vetrani, C; Vitale, M, 2021
)
2.37
" The developed methods were successfully applied for the determination of glimepiride and pioglitazone hydrochloride in pure powder and dosage form."( Spectrophotometric methods for determination of glimepiride and pioglitazone hydrochloride mixture and application in their pharmaceutical formulation.
Atta, MY; Ghoniem, NS; Hegazy, MA; Hussien, EM, 2022
)
1.18
" We then hypothesize that optimal pioglitazone dosing will lead to ongoing neuroprotection and cognitive benefits that are dependent on pioglitazone-mitoNEET signalling pathways."( Clinically relevant mitochondrial-targeted therapy improves chronic outcomes after traumatic brain injury.
Berkowitz, BA; Burden, S; Cloud, AL; Geldenhuys, WJ; Gooch, JL; Harris, NG; Hubbard, WB; Powell, DK; Spry, ML; Sullivan, PG; Vekaria, HJ, 2021
)
0.9
"The multipurpose RP-HPLC method has been developed and validated for the synchronous estimation of multiple combined pharmaceutical dosage forms of metformin hydrochloride."( DoE-Based Analytical Failure Modes Critical Effect Analysis (AFMCEA) to a Multipurpose-RP-HPLC Method for the Estimation of Multiple FDC Products of Metformin Hydrochloride Using an Analytical Quality by Design Approach.
Mistry, KY; Prajapati, PB; Shah, SA, 2022
)
0.72
" Further study is needed to confirm these findings so that clinicians may optimize dosing of this secondary prevention strategy in patients with stroke."( Efficacy of lower doses of pioglitazone after stroke or transient ischaemic attack in patients with insulin resistance.
Abdul-Ghani, M; Dandona, P; DeFronzo, R; Furie, K; Inzucchi, SE; Kernan, WN; Spence, JD; Viscoli, C; Young, LH, 2022
)
1.02
" Eco-friendly, cost-effective, and precise stability-indicating RP-HPLC method was developed and validated for the identification and quantification of Alogliptin and Pioglitazone in their tablet dosage form, as well as implementation to in vitro dissolution studies and uniformity of dosage unit."( An Effective Chromatographic Method for Simultaneous Quantification of Antidiabetic Drugs Alogliptin Benzoate and Pioglitazone HCl in Their Tablet Dosage Form: Implementation to In vitro Dissolution Studies and Uniformity of Dosage Unit.
Mohamed, MA, 2023
)
1.32
" The proposed method was applied for the analysis of PIO and MET both individually and in a combined dosage tablet formulation."( Development of Capillary Zone Electrophoresis Method for the Simultaneous Separation and Quantification of Metformin and Pioglitazone in Dosage Forms; and Comparison with HPLC Method.
Alnajjar, AO; AlThikrallah, MKI; Buzid, A; Elbashir, AA; Elgorashe, REE; Idris, AM, 2023
)
1.12
"A reversed-phase RP-HPLC method was developed for the simultaneous determination of metformin hydrochloride (MET), pioglitazone (PIO), and glimepiride (GLM) in their combined dosage forms and spiked human plasma."( Deduction of the operable design space of RP-HPLC technique for the simultaneous estimation of metformin, pioglitazone, and glimepiride.
Elkhodary, MM; Hammad, SF; Kamal, AH; Marie, AA; Salim, MM, 2023
)
1.33
" Among these 25 ions, 18 exhibited a dose-response relationship."( Development of a metabolomics-based data analysis approach for identifying drug metabolites based on high-resolution mass spectrometry.
Chang, TY; Chiou, YS; Li, PJ; Lin, GY; Shih, CL; Ting, HH, 2023
)
0.91
"The combined treatment with INS 18 U/kg + PIO 5 mg/kg was more effective in preventing advanced cachexia in TB rats than each treatment alone, emerging as the best approach, considering the lower dosage and higher efficacy."( Insulin in combination with pioglitazone prevents advanced cachexia in 256-Walker tumor-bearing rats: effect is greater than treatment alone and is associated with improved insulin sensitivity.
Bazotte, RB; Bertolini, GL; Biazi, GR; Cassolla, P; de Souza Galia, WB; de Souza, HM; Diaz, BF; Ferraz, LS; Frasson, IG; Kurauti, MA; Mareze-Costa, CE; Marmentini, C; Miksza, DR; Peres, SB, 2023
)
1.2
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (10)

RoleDescription
insulin-sensitizing drugAn agent which overcomes insulin resistance by activation of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPAR-gamma).
EC 2.7.1.33 (pantothenate kinase) inhibitorAn EC 2.7.1.* (phosphotransferases with an alcohol group as acceptor) inhibitor that interferes with the action of pantothenate kinase (EC 2.7.1.33).
xenobioticA xenobiotic (Greek, xenos "foreign"; bios "life") is a compound that is foreign to a living organism. Principal xenobiotics include: drugs, carcinogens and various compounds that have been introduced into the environment by artificial means.
EC 6.2.1.3 (long-chain-fatty-acid--CoA ligase) inhibitorAn EC 6.2.1.* (acid-thiol ligase) inhibitor that interferes with the action of a long-chain-fatty-acid--CoA ligase (EC 6.2.1.3).
ferroptosis inhibitorAny substance that inhibits the process of ferroptosis (a type of programmed cell death dependent on iron and characterized by the accumulation of lipid peroxides) in organisms.
cardioprotective agentAny protective agent that is able to prevent damage to the heart.
PPARgamma agonistA PPAR modulator which activates the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma.
antidepressantAntidepressants are mood-stimulating drugs used primarily in the treatment of affective disorders and related conditions.
geroprotectorAny compound that supports healthy aging, slows the biological aging process, or extends lifespan.
hypoglycemic agentA drug which lowers the blood glucose level.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (3)

ClassDescription
thiazolidinedionesA thiadiazolidine in which the 1,3-thiazolidine ring is substituted by two oxo groups.
aromatic etherAny ether in which the oxygen is attached to at least one aryl substituent.
pyridinesAny organonitrogen heterocyclic compound based on a pyridine skeleton and its substituted derivatives.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (34)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, MAJOR APURINIC/APYRIMIDINIC ENDONUCLEASEHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.51190.003245.467312,589.2998AID2517
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency26.10110.000811.382244.6684AID686978; AID686979
aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1Homo sapiens (human)Potency15.84890.011212.4002100.0000AID1030
EWS/FLI fusion proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.15530.001310.157742.8575AID1259252; AID1259253
tyrosine-protein kinase YesHomo sapiens (human)Potency1.72910.00005.018279.2586AID686947
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
CDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)1.00001.00001.05001.1000AID458856
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)49.50000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Bile salt export pumpRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)2.00000.40002.75008.6000AID1209456
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.70000.70000.70000.7000AID408484
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.33700.11007.190310.0000AID1209455; AID1443980; AID1443989; AID1449628; AID1473738; AID1674183
Carbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.11400.00021.10608.3000AID625236
Steryl-sulfataseHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.80000.00010.40717.6000AID291758
Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)220.00000.00053.49849.7600AID440905
Carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrialRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)100.00000.38002.09335.1000AID1207593
Amine oxidase [flavin-containing] BRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki0.85670.00081.09276.0000AID1192621; AID1192622; AID662859
Amine oxidase [flavin-containing] A Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki0.27080.00190.55334.8000AID1192621
Amine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)35.06900.00002.37899.7700AID625150
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaMus musculus (house mouse)IC50 (µMol)1.15000.08000.61501.1500AID1546897
Carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)100.00000.16002.03003.9000AID1207590
Amine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.29800.00001.89149.5700AID1917380; AID501302
Amine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.32340.00061.777110.0000AID1192621; AID1192622; AID662861
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)5.40810.00501.205110.0000AID1237265; AID1419241; AID1466739; AID156959; AID1614508; AID291758; AID548200; AID699016
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.57610.00000.37905.6000AID1537172; AID157099; AID157268; AID157275; AID1614505; AID1673238; AID1701617; AID1918900
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaMus musculus (house mouse)IC50 (µMol)0.70000.70000.70000.7000AID348420
Carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)10.00001.05001.05001.0500AID1207592
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)10.00000.00050.82696.3100AID156285
Enoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase [NADH] Francisella tularensis subsp. tularensis SCHU S4IC50 (µMol)79.00000.05001.91256.0000AID756998
CDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)4.80002.29003.54504.8000AID1572805
CDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)8.65000.73103.79949.0780AID1323834
CDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 1Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.37000.03101.20547.2910AID1323835
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Free fatty acid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)812.83100.00030.73698.8000AID1172631
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)EC50 (µMol)0.55000.00001.262610.0000AID141913
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)EC50 (µMol)0.55000.00000.764610.0000AID141913
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)EC50 (µMol)0.55000.00000.990510.0000AID141913
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)EC50 (µMol)0.55000.00001.052810.0000AID141913
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)EC50 (µMol)0.55000.00001.160510.0000AID141913
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.80270.00000.992210.0000AID1169794; AID1276056; AID1330908; AID1333353; AID1333356; AID1397117; AID1409295; AID1419242; AID1423207; AID1428289; AID1466737; AID1546883; AID156931; AID156943; AID157124; AID157264; AID1578127; AID1614504; AID1614507; AID1614512; AID1737435; AID1918904; AID223547; AID268111; AID473102; AID476882; AID499442; AID550058; AID590196; AID607038; AID614594; AID648526; AID709646; AID718850; AID728045; AID91246
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)Kd0.87100.00120.95314.9800AID1614511
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaMus musculus (house mouse)EC50 (µMol)0.62000.00031.654210.0000AID141913; AID157283
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)6.68670.00061.607410.0000AID1546882; AID156146; AID223541
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Other Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)Activity3.14000.12002.00875.5000AID1614509; AID1614510
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (225)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayFree fatty acid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationFree fatty acid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
insulin secretionFree fatty acid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of interleukin-1 beta productionFree fatty acid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
glucose homeostasisFree fatty acid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of calcium ion transportFree fatty acid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to fatty acidFree fatty acid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
ion channel modulating, G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayFree fatty acid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
ligand-gated ion channel signaling pathwayFree fatty acid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of insulin secretionFree fatty acid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayFree fatty acid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
morphogenesis of an epitheliumCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of synaptic transmission, GABAergicCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular pH reductionCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
angiotensin-activated signaling pathwayCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of monoatomic anion transportCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
secretionCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intracellular pHCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of dipeptide transmembrane transportCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of chloride transportCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
carbon dioxide transportCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
one-carbon metabolic processCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
steroid catabolic processSteryl-sulfataseHomo sapiens (human)
female pregnancySteryl-sulfataseHomo sapiens (human)
epidermis developmentSteryl-sulfataseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of JUN kinase activityTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein dephosphorylationTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
insulin receptor signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of signal transductionTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of signal transductionTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
actin cytoskeleton organizationTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of endocytosisTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein responseTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intracellular protein transportTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to unfolded proteinTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-tyrosine dephosphorylationTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
IRE1-mediated unfolded protein responseTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
insulin receptor recyclingTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of MAP kinase activityTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of insulin receptor signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of type I interferon-mediated signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
growth hormone receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein tyrosine kinase activityTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascadeTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of hepatocyte growth factor receptor signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of IRE1-mediated unfolded protein responseTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of PERK-mediated unfolded protein responseTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-tyrosine dephosphorylation involved in inactivation of protein kinase activityTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of receptor catabolic processTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
biogenic amine metabolic processAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of signal transductionAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
dopamine catabolic processAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid metabolic processCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
fatty acid beta-oxidationCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
carnitine shuttleCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
carnitine metabolic processCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
response to toxic substanceAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
response to aluminum ionAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
response to selenium ionAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of serotonin secretionAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
phenylethylamine catabolic processAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
substantia nigra developmentAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
dopamine catabolic processAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of dopamine metabolic processAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
hydrogen peroxide biosynthetic processAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
response to corticosteroneAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cholesterol effluxPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid transportPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of osteoblast differentiationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of receptor signaling pathway via STATPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of low-density lipoprotein receptor activityPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of signaling receptor activityPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of BMP signaling pathwayPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of MAP kinase activityPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of adiponectin secretionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA transcriptionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cardiac muscle hypertrophy in response to stressPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of connective tissue replacement involved in inflammatory response wound healingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
placenta developmentPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
lipid metabolic processPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
activation of cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in apoptotic processPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
response to nutrientPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of blood pressurePeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
macrophage derived foam cell differentiationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of macrophage derived foam cell differentiationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cholesterol storagePeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of lipid storagePeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of sequestering of triglyceridePeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of angiogenesisPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
monocyte differentiationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
BMP signaling pathwayPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell differentiationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to insulin stimulusPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
response to lipidPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor signaling pathwayPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
glucose homeostasisPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of circadian rhythmPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
mRNA transcription by RNA polymerase IIPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
lipoprotein transportPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of blood vessel endothelial cell migrationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
innate immune responsePeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
cell fate commitmentPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fat cell differentiationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid receptor signaling pathwayPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
cell maturationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
rhythmic processPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
white fat cell differentiationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-binding transcription factor activityPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of type II interferon-mediated signaling pathwayPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of SMAD protein signal transductionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cholesterol transporter activityPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to low-density lipoprotein particle stimulusPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitochondrial fissionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cellular response to insulin stimulusPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of extracellular matrix assemblyPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA transcriptionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cellular response to transforming growth factor beta stimulusPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of adipose tissue developmentPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of vascular associated smooth muscle cell proliferationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vascular associated smooth muscle cell apoptotic processPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of vascular endothelial cell proliferationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fatty acid metabolic processPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of inflammatory responsePeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
cell differentiationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
hormone-mediated signaling pathwayPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
response to hypoxiaCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid metabolic processCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
glucose metabolic processCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
fatty acid beta-oxidationCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
triglyceride metabolic processCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
carnitine shuttleCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
response to nutrientCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
carnitine metabolic processCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of lipid storageCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell differentiationCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
eating behaviorCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
response to alkaloidCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of innate immune responseCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
aflatoxin metabolic processCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of insulin secretionCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to fatty acidCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
liver regenerationCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
response to tetrachloromethaneCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cytokine production involved in inflammatory responsePeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of reactive oxygen species biosynthetic processPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of hepatocyte apoptotic processPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of signaling receptor activityPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ATP biosynthetic processPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transductionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transformation of host cell by virusPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
response to hypoxiaPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
gluconeogenesisPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
heart developmentPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
response to nutrientPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
epidermis developmentPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to starvationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cellular ketone metabolic processPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of macrophage derived foam cell differentiationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cholesterol storagePeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of sequestering of triglyceridePeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid metabolic processPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular receptor signaling pathwayPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of appetitePeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
response to insulinPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
circadian regulation of gene expressionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to nicotinePeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
wound healingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
lipoprotein metabolic processPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of circadian rhythmPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
steroid hormone mediated signaling pathwayPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gluconeogenesisPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of blood pressurePeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glycolytic processPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nitric oxide metabolic processPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fatty acid oxidationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of lipid biosynthetic processPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of inflammatory responsePeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell growth involved in cardiac muscle cell developmentPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
enamel mineralizationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to fructose stimulusPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA transcriptionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of leukocyte cell-cell adhesionPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid transportPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
hormone-mediated signaling pathwayPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fatty acid metabolic processPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cell differentiationPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
autophagyCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of autophagyCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
autophagy of mitochondrionCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of autophagyCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cellular respirationCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein maturation by [2Fe-2S] cluster transferCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (93)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
G protein-coupled receptor activityFree fatty acid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
lipid bindingFree fatty acid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
bioactive lipid receptor activityFree fatty acid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
arylesterase activityCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
carbonate dehydratase activityCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cyanamide hydratase activityCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
steryl-sulfatase activitySteryl-sulfataseHomo sapiens (human)
sulfuric ester hydrolase activitySteryl-sulfataseHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingSteryl-sulfataseHomo sapiens (human)
arylsulfatase activitySteryl-sulfataseHomo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein tyrosine phosphatase activityTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
insulin receptor bindingTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase bindingTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
receptor tyrosine kinase bindingTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
cadherin bindingTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
ephrin receptor bindingTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 2A bindingTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
non-membrane spanning protein tyrosine phosphatase activityTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
primary amine oxidase activityAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
aliphatic amine oxidase activityAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
monoamine oxidase activityAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
flavin adenine dinucleotide bindingAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase activityCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
carnitine O-octanoyltransferase activityCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
acyltransferase activityCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
primary amine oxidase activityAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
electron transfer activityAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
aliphatic amine oxidase activityAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
monoamine oxidase activityAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
flavin adenine dinucleotide bindingAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
transcription coregulator bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleic acid bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
double-stranded DNA bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin receptor activityPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
peptide bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific DNA bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear retinoid X receptor bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA binding domain bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
LBD domain bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
alpha-actinin bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
R-SMAD bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
E-box bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
STAT family protein bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase activityCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
protein-macromolecule adaptor activityCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
palmitoleoyltransferase activityCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activityPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
transcription coactivator bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear steroid receptor activityPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
lipid bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
phosphatase bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein domain specific bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific DNA bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
NFAT protein bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
MDM2/MDM4 family protein bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor bindingPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
2 iron, 2 sulfur cluster bindingCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
pyridoxal phosphate bindingCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
L-cysteine transaminase activityCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
2 iron, 2 sulfur cluster bindingCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (45)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneFree fatty acid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneFree fatty acid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
myelin sheathCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
apical part of cellCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
apical part of cellCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
lysosomeSteryl-sulfataseHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeSteryl-sulfataseHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumSteryl-sulfataseHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum lumenSteryl-sulfataseHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneSteryl-sulfataseHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusSteryl-sulfataseHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSteryl-sulfataseHomo sapiens (human)
membraneSteryl-sulfataseHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleSteryl-sulfataseHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
early endosomeTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial cristaTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
endosome lumenTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
sorting endosomeTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic side of endoplasmic reticulum membraneTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
early endosomeTyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial outer membraneAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaMus musculus (house mouse)
nucleoplasmCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
nucleolusCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial inner membraneCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial envelopeAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial outer membraneAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organellePeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II transcription regulator complexPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
chromatinPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
receptor complexPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaMus musculus (house mouse)
mitochondrionCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial outer membraneCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
membraneCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
chromatinPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial outer membraneCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear endoplasmic reticulumCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial outer membraneCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial outer membraneCDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (585)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1636440Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2D6-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 300 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of NA2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID1443992Total Cmax in human administered as single dose2014Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), Sep, Volume: 60, Issue:3
Human drug-induced liver injury severity is highly associated with dual inhibition of liver mitochondrial function and bile salt export pump.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID705498Binding affinity to mouse serine/threonine-protein kinase WNK1 by chromatographic analysis relative to rosiglitazone2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1323835Displacement of [3H]rosiglitazone from recombinant human C-terminal His-tagged MitoNEET cytosolic domain (32 to 108 residues) expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 by Cheng-Prusoff analysis2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-01, Volume: 26, Issue:21
Identification of small molecules that bind to the mitochondrial protein mitoNEET.
AID1072116Antiinflammatory activity in human THP1 cells assessed as inhibition of PMA-induced TNF-alpha secretion incubated for 2 hrs prior to PMA challenge measured after 48 hrs by ELISA2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-21, Volume: 75Synthesis of novel 1,2-benzothiazine 1,1-dioxide-3-ethanone oxime N-aryl acetamide ether derivatives as potent anti-inflammatory agents and inhibitors of monocyte-to-macrophage transformation.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1231389Lipophilicity, log P of the compound2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-01, Volume: 23, Issue:13
Thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives: programmed chemical weapons for key protein targets of various pathological conditions.
AID1072114Antiinflammatory activity in human THP1 cells assessed as inhibition of PMA-induced MCP-1 secretion incubated for 2 hrs prior to PMA challenge measured after 72 hrs by ELISA2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-21, Volume: 75Synthesis of novel 1,2-benzothiazine 1,1-dioxide-3-ethanone oxime N-aryl acetamide ether derivatives as potent anti-inflammatory agents and inhibitors of monocyte-to-macrophage transformation.
AID1217728Intrinsic clearance for reactive metabolites formation per mg of protein based on cytochrome P450 (unknown origin) inactivation rate by TDI assay2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID1701622Induction of adipogenesis in human BMMSC cotreated with IDX
AID625277FDA Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base Benchmark Dataset (LTKB-BD) drugs of less concern for DILI2011Drug discovery today, Aug, Volume: 16, Issue:15-16
FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
AID1209457Unbound Cmax in human plasma2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 40, Issue:1
In vitro inhibition of the bile salt export pump correlates with risk of cholestatic drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1072115Antiinflammatory activity in human THP1 cells assessed as inhibition of PMA-induced IL-8 secretion incubated for 2 hrs prior to PMA challenge measured after 48 hrs by ELISA2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-21, Volume: 75Synthesis of novel 1,2-benzothiazine 1,1-dioxide-3-ethanone oxime N-aryl acetamide ether derivatives as potent anti-inflammatory agents and inhibitors of monocyte-to-macrophage transformation.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1166256Hepatoprotective effect in streptozotocin induced diabetic Albino Wistar rat model assessed as reduction in serum ALT level2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-24, Volume: 87Design, synthesis, in silico molecular docking and biological evaluation of novel oxadiazole based thiazolidine-2,4-diones bis-heterocycles as PPAR-γ agonists.
AID157124Activation of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma measured by induction of 50% of maximum alkaline phosphatase activity, transfection assay in CV-1 cells1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-03, Volume: 41, Issue:25
N-(2-Benzoylphenyl)-L-tyrosine PPARgamma agonists. 1. Discovery of a novel series of potent antihyperglycemic and antihyperlipidemic agents.
AID1224232Hepatotoxicity in streptozotocin-induced in Albino Wistar rat diabetic model assessed increase in portal triad Inflammation by Haematoxylin/Eosin staining-based microscopy2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 24, Issue:14
Thiazolidine-2,4-diones derivatives as PPAR-γ agonists: synthesis, molecular docking, in vitro and in vivo antidiabetic activity with hepatotoxicity risk evaluation and effect on PPAR-γ gene expression.
AID1335103Decrease in insulin levels in diet-induced obese mouse at 10 mg/kg, po qd administered daily via gavage for 14 days measured on day 14 post dose2017ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-12, Volume: 8, Issue:1
Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Novel and Selective G-protein Coupled Receptor 120 (GPR120) Spirocyclic Agonists.
AID1677035Antiproliferative activity against human GURAV cells assessed as cell growth inhibition2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 12-01, Volume: 30, Issue:23
Benzylidene thiazolidinediones: Synthesis, in vitro investigations of antiproliferative mechanisms and in vivo efficacy determination in combination with Imatinib.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID730267Toxicity against KKAy mouse assessed as total cholesterol level at 10 mg/kg/day, po for 14 days (Rvb = 153.2 +/- 11.1 mg/dL)2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-14, Volume: 56, Issue:5
Mechanism of retinoid X receptor partial agonistic action of 1-(3,5,5,8,8-pentamethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-naphthyl)-1H-benzotriazole-5-carboxylic acid and structural development to increase potency.
AID1276058Transactivation of human PPARdelta expressed in African green monkey COS7 cells at 10 uM incubated overnight by dual-glo luciferase reporter assay2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 59, Issue:1
N-Benzylbenzamides: A Novel Merged Scaffold for Orally Available Dual Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase/Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Modulators.
AID705496Binding affinity to mouse cyclic AMP-dependent transcription factor ATF-2 by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID119525In vivo decrease in insulin in obese mice(ob/ob) at 3 mg/kg/day peroral administration for 2 weeks1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-22, Volume: 9, Issue:4
(3-substituted benzyl)thiazolidine-2,4-diones as structurally new antihyperglycemic agents.
AID1741906Inhibition of PTP1B in human HepG2 cells assessed as improvement in insulin-induced 2-NBDG uptake at 5 uM incubated for 24 hrs prior to compound washout followed by insulin stimulation for 20 mins and subsequent 2-NBDG addition measured after 60 mins by F2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 205Synthesis and biological evaluation of geniposide derivatives as potent and selective PTPlB inhibitors.
AID473102Transactivation of human PPARgamma LBD expressed in african green monkey Cos7 cells co-transfected with fused GAL4-DBD after 14 hrs by Dual-Glo Luciferase reporter gene assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 20, Issue:8
Rational design of a pirinixic acid derivative that acts as subtype-selective PPARgamma modulator.
AID718850Transactivation of human GAL4-fused PPARgamma ligand binding domain transfected in HEK293 cells after 18 hrs by dual luciferase reporter gene assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 22, Issue:24
Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of fibrate-based analogues inside PPARs.
AID223541In vitro transactivation using receptor transactivation assay against hPPAR alpha2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID141904Agonist activity for murine PPAR alpha receptor in transcriptional activation assay; IA means inactive at 10 uM2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-24, Volume: 43, Issue:4
The PPARs: from orphan receptors to drug discovery.
AID1701617Binding affinity to PPAR-gamma (unknown origin) by TR-FRET assay
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID699009Agonist activity at human PPARgamma expressed in human HEK293 cells assessed as SHP promoter transactivation at 100 nM by luciferase reporter gene assay relative to vehicle-treated control2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 22, Issue:8
Sesquiterpene lactones from Tithonia diversifolia act as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists.
AID503313Antiproliferative activity against human PC3 cells at 15 uM after 120 hrs by MTT assay relative to DMSO2006Nature chemical biology, Jun, Volume: 2, Issue:6
Identifying off-target effects and hidden phenotypes of drugs in human cells.
AID119521In vivo decrease in glucose in obese mice(ob/ob) at 3 mg/kg/day peroral administration for 2 weeks1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-22, Volume: 9, Issue:4
(3-substituted benzyl)thiazolidine-2,4-diones as structurally new antihyperglycemic agents.
AID1383699Hypolipemic activity in db/db mouse assessed as total plasma cholesterol level at 30 mg/kg, po treated for 3 consecutive weeks (Rvb = 6.05 to 6.98 mM)2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Discovery of tetrahydrocarbazoles with potent hypoglycemic and hypolipemic activities.
AID1512632Toxicity in C57BL/6 mouse assessed as hematocrit level at 40 mg/kg (Rvb = 45%)2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 27, Issue:22
Development of a novel class of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma ligands as an anticancer agent with a unique binding mode based on a non-thiazolidinedione scaffold.
AID1224231Hepatotoxicity in streptozotocin-induced in Albino Wistar rat diabetic model assessed increase in sinusoidal dilatation by Haematoxylin/Eosin staining-based microscopy2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 24, Issue:14
Thiazolidine-2,4-diones derivatives as PPAR-γ agonists: synthesis, molecular docking, in vitro and in vivo antidiabetic activity with hepatotoxicity risk evaluation and effect on PPAR-γ gene expression.
AID1423207Transactivation of human full length PPARgamma expressed in HEK293 cells after 18 hrs by luciferase reporter gene based luminescence assay2018Journal of natural products, 11-26, Volume: 81, Issue:11
Stereoselective Synthesis of the Isomers of Notoincisol A: Assigment of the Absolute Configuration of this Natural Product and Biological Evaluation.
AID119527In vivo decrease in glucose in obese mice(ob/ob) by 10 mg/kg/day peroral administration for 2 weeks1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-22, Volume: 9, Issue:4
(3-substituted benzyl)thiazolidine-2,4-diones as structurally new antihyperglycemic agents.
AID1673228Induction of adipogenesis in human BMMSC cells assessed as increase in HMGCR mRNA at 1 uM incubated for 3 days by qRT-PCR analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-01, Volume: 27, Issue:13
2-Phenyl-8-(1-phenylallyl)-chromenone compounds have a pan-PPAR modulator pharmacophore.
AID1198932Induction of p53 protein level in human HepG2 cells at 50 uM upto 24 hrs by immunoblot analysis2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-01, Volume: 25, Issue:9
Structural insight of glitazone for hepato-toxicity: Resolving mystery by PASS.
AID705482Binding affinity to mouse serine/threonine-protein kinase MAK by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID665289Hypoglycemic activity in alloxan-induced diabetic Wistar rat model assessed as reduction in plasma glucose level at 30 mg/kg, po for 15 days measured on day 152012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 53Synthesis, hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic activities of novel thiazolidinedione derivatives containing thiazole/triazole/oxadiazole ring.
AID1276052Solubility of the compound in water by microplate reader analysis2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 59, Issue:1
N-Benzylbenzamides: A Novel Merged Scaffold for Orally Available Dual Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase/Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Modulators.
AID548200Displacement of fluormone PPAR-green from N-terminal His-tagged human PPARgamma-LBD after 2 hrs by fluorescence polarization assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
1,3-Diphenyl-1H-pyrazole derivatives as a new series of potent PPARγ partial agonists.
AID1466741Cytotoxicity against HEK293 cells harboring beta-galactosidase expression plasmid assessed as effect on beta-galactosidase activity2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-15, Volume: 27, Issue:12
Structure-activity relationships of rosiglitazone for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma transrepression.
AID1217729Intrinsic clearance for reactive metabolites formation assessed as summation of [3H]GSH adduct formation rate-based reactive metabolites formation and cytochrome P450 (unknown origin) inactivation rate-based reactive metabolites formation2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID607038Partial agonist activity at human PPARgamma-LBD/Gal4 DNA binding domain by transactivation assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-23, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Discovery of a series of imidazo[4,5-b]pyridines with dual activity at angiotensin II type 1 receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ.
AID601557Glucose consumption in differentiated mouse 3T3L1 cells in high-glucose medium at 50 ug/ml after 24 hrs by glucose-oxidase method (Rvb =3.06 +/- 0.29 mmol/L)2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 19, Issue:10
Synthesis and biological evaluation of new flavonoid fatty acid esters with anti-adipogenic and enhancing glucose consumption activities.
AID1466739Transrepression activity at human PPARgamma expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as inhibition of TNFalpha induced NF-kappaB promoter activity pretreated for 4 hrs followed by TNFalpha stimulation after 3 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-15, Volume: 27, Issue:12
Structure-activity relationships of rosiglitazone for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma transrepression.
AID1397111Agonist activity at PPARgamma in human HepG2 cells assessed as activation of PPRE at 0.78 ug/ml incubated for 24 hrs by dual luciferase reporter gene assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-07, Volume: 26, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, and evaluation of novel l-phenylglycine derivatives as potential PPARγ lead compounds.
AID705485Binding affinity to mouse dynactin-1 by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1537172Binding affinity to PPARgamma (unknown origin) by TR-FRET assay2019Journal of natural products, 02-22, Volume: 82, Issue:2
Adiponectin-Secretion-Promoting Phenylethylchromones from the Agarwood of Aquilaria malaccensis.
AID730272Toxicity against KKAy mouse assessed as plasma ALT level at 10 mg/kg/day, po for 14 days (Rvb = 17.6 +/- 0.9 IU)2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-14, Volume: 56, Issue:5
Mechanism of retinoid X receptor partial agonistic action of 1-(3,5,5,8,8-pentamethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-naphthyl)-1H-benzotriazole-5-carboxylic acid and structural development to increase potency.
AID1166248Agonist activity at PPARgamma (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as receptor transactivation at 10 uM by PPRE-driven luciferase reporter gene assay2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-24, Volume: 87Design, synthesis, in silico molecular docking and biological evaluation of novel oxadiazole based thiazolidine-2,4-diones bis-heterocycles as PPAR-γ agonists.
AID1217711Metabolic activation in human liver microsomes assessed as [3H]GSH adduct formation rate measured per mg of protein at 100 uM by [3H]GSH trapping assay2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID1409608AUC (viral infection %) for SARS-CoV-2 in the Vero E6 cell line at 48 h by immunofluorescence-based assay (detecting the viral NP protein in the nucleus of the Vero E6 cells).2020Nature, 07, Volume: 583, Issue:7816
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID23875Clearance after oral administration2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID1870361Induction of adipogenesis in human differentiated BMMSC cells assessed as increase in adiponectin secretion and measured on 5 day in presence of IDX induction medium by ELISA2022ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-14, Volume: 13, Issue:7
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Activity of l-1'-Homologated Adenosine Derivatives.
AID590197Partial agonist activity at human PPARgamma expressed in CHO cells co-transfected with Gal4-responsive luciferase reporter plasmid after 24 hrs by transactivation assay relative to pioglitazone2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 21, Issue:7
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of novel benzoylazole-based PPAR α/γ activators.
AID1356773Hepatotoxicity in human HepG2 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 24 hrs by MTT assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-13, Volume: 61, Issue:17
Tau-Centric Multitarget Approach for Alzheimer's Disease: Development of First-in-Class Dual Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β and Tau-Aggregation Inhibitors.
AID1192633Inhibition of human recombinant soluble MAO-B assessed as change in melting temperature at 100 uM after 20 mins by SYPRO orange staining-based fluorescence assay2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 23, Issue:4
Reversible and irreversible small molecule inhibitors of monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) investigated by biophysical techniques.
AID1633589Ex vivo antiinflammatory activity in Sprague-Dawley rat liver assessed as inhibition of LPS-induced PGE2 production at 1 uM incubated for 4 hrs followed by LPS addition by radioimmunoassay2019ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-11, Volume: 10, Issue:4
Novel Phenyldiazenyl Fibrate Analogues as PPAR α/γ/δ Pan-Agonists for the Amelioration of Metabolic Syndrome.
AID648531Agonist activity at GAL4-tagged human PPARalpha ligand binding domain expressed in HepG2 cells assessed as transactivation at 5 to 10 uM after 20 hrs by beta-galactosidase reporter gene assay relative to Wy-146432012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular investigation of fluorinated peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors α/γ dual agonists.
AID1443991Induction of mitochondrial dysfunction in Sprague-Dawley rat liver mitochondria assessed as inhibition of mitochondrial respiration per mg mitochondrial protein measured for 20 mins by A65N-1 oxygen probe based fluorescence assay2014Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), Sep, Volume: 60, Issue:3
Human drug-induced liver injury severity is highly associated with dual inhibition of liver mitochondrial function and bile salt export pump.
AID730269Toxicity against KKAy mouse assessed as blood urea nitrogen level at 10 mg/kg/day, po for 14 days (Rvb = 21.9 +/- 1.1 mg/dL)2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-14, Volume: 56, Issue:5
Mechanism of retinoid X receptor partial agonistic action of 1-(3,5,5,8,8-pentamethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-naphthyl)-1H-benzotriazole-5-carboxylic acid and structural development to increase potency.
AID1677032Antiproliferative activity against human PC-3 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 12-01, Volume: 30, Issue:23
Benzylidene thiazolidinediones: Synthesis, in vitro investigations of antiproliferative mechanisms and in vivo efficacy determination in combination with Imatinib.
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID1816972Cytotoxicity against human CEM cells assessed as cell death incubated at 50 uM for 20 hrs measured by DNS assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-27, Volume: 64, Issue:10
Thiazolidinedione "Magic Bullets" Simultaneously Targeting PPARγ and HDACs: Design, Synthesis, and Investigations of their
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID605746Antidiabetic activity in ZDF rat assessed as adiponectin level at 3 mg/kg, po QD for 40 days (Rvb = 11.9+/-1.5 ug/ml)2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-23, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Discovery of a series of imidazo[4,5-b]pyridines with dual activity at angiotensin II type 1 receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ.
AID1674183Inhibition of human BSEP expressed in HEK293 cell membrane vesicles assessed as reduction in 3H-TCA uptake incubated for 5 mins by radiodetection method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-22, Volume: 63, Issue:20
Drug Induced Liver Injury (DILI). Mechanisms and Medicinal Chemistry Avoidance/Mitigation Strategies.
AID156619In vitro transactivation of human Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor delta (hPPARdelta)2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-06, Volume: 46, Issue:23
Large dimeric ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity in vitro and in vivo.
AID458856Displacement of [3H]rosiglitazone from rat liver mitochondrial mitoNEET by scintillation counting2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 20, Issue:3
Structure-based design of a thiazolidinedione which targets the mitochondrial protein mitoNEET.
AID1737443Cytotoxicity against human HS5 cells assessed as cell death at 10 uM measured after 72 hrs by Propidium iodide stain based FACS analysis2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 195Identification and development of non-cytotoxic cell death modulators: Impact of sartans and derivatives on PPARγ activation and on growth of imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.
AID665292Hypolipidemic activity in alloxan-induced diabetic Wistar rat model assessed as reduction in triglyceride level at 10 mg/kg, po for 15 days measured on day 152012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 53Synthesis, hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic activities of novel thiazolidinedione derivatives containing thiazole/triazole/oxadiazole ring.
AID1753287Drug metabolism in human liver microsomes assessed as NADPH-dependent covalent bond binding assessed per mg protein at 10 umol/L incubated for 1 hr in presence of NADPH by liquid scintillation counter analysis
AID1623711Inhibition of PTP1B in human HepG2 cells assessed as increase in insulin stimulated glucose uptake at 5 uM preincubated for 24 hrs followed by insulin addition and measured after 10 mins by 2-NBDG dye-based FACS analysis relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Investigation of stereoisomeric bisarylethenesulfonic acid esters for discovering potent and selective PTP1B inhibitors.
AID1451559Transactivation of PPARgamma in human HepG2 cells assessed as FAM3A mRNA expression at 1 uM after 8 to 16 hrs by SYBR green based qRT-PCR analysis relative to DMSO control2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-28, Volume: 60, Issue:18
A Dual Modulator of Farnesoid X Receptor and Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase To Counter Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.
AID1614506Binding affinity to human 6His-tagged PPARgamma isoform 1 LBD (203 to 477 residues) expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) assessed as unfolding temperature at 1 molar equiv concentration by thermal denaturation assay (Rvb = 45.6 degC)2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-28, Volume: 62, Issue:4
Structural Basis of Altered Potency and Efficacy Displayed by a Major in Vivo Metabolite of the Antidiabetic PPARγ Drug Pioglitazone.
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID1166259Increase in PPARgamma gene expression in mouse 3T3L1 cells at 10 uM incubated for 24 hrs by real-time PCR method relative to untreated control2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-24, Volume: 87Design, synthesis, in silico molecular docking and biological evaluation of novel oxadiazole based thiazolidine-2,4-diones bis-heterocycles as PPAR-γ agonists.
AID730273Toxicity against KKAy mouse assessed as plasma AST level at 10 mg/kg/day, po for 14 days (Rvb = 49.6 +/- 2.3 IU)2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-14, Volume: 56, Issue:5
Mechanism of retinoid X receptor partial agonistic action of 1-(3,5,5,8,8-pentamethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-naphthyl)-1H-benzotriazole-5-carboxylic acid and structural development to increase potency.
AID1315299Antidiabetic activity in leptin receptor deficient db/db C57BL/KSJ mouse assessed as decrease in postprandial blood glucose level at 10 mg/kg, po for 15 consecutive days measured on day 7 to 14 post dose2016Journal of natural products, 05-27, Volume: 79, Issue:5
Naturally Occurring Carbazole Alkaloids from Murraya koenigii as Potential Antidiabetic Agents.
AID1614504Transactivation of chimeric Gal4 yeast DBD fused-PPARgamma LBD (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293T cells co-expressing PPRE after 18 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-28, Volume: 62, Issue:4
Structural Basis of Altered Potency and Efficacy Displayed by a Major in Vivo Metabolite of the Antidiabetic PPARγ Drug Pioglitazone.
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID665294Hypolipidemic activity in alloxan-induced diabetic Wistar rat model assessed as reduction in triglyceride level at 100 mg/kg, po for 15 days measured on day 152012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 53Synthesis, hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic activities of novel thiazolidinedione derivatives containing thiazole/triazole/oxadiazole ring.
AID1503556Induction of apoptosis in human SCC15 cells assessed as increase in caspase 3 activity at 50 uM after 24 hrs relative to control2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 141Anticancer properties of 4-thiazolidinone derivatives depend on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ).
AID1677031Antiproliferative activity against human HOP-62 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 12-01, Volume: 30, Issue:23
Benzylidene thiazolidinediones: Synthesis, in vitro investigations of antiproliferative mechanisms and in vivo efficacy determination in combination with Imatinib.
AID122587Maximum achieved blood glucose reduction relative to vehicle treated control group2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID1193225Hypoglycemic effect in eight week old female db/db mouse assessed as reduction in blood glucose level at 30 mg/kg, intragastric for 2 weeks2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of GY3-based derivatives for anti-type 2 diabetes activity.
AID730266Toxicity against KKAy mouse assessed as creatinine level at 10 mg/kg/day, po for 14 days (Rvb = 0.2 mg/dl)2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-14, Volume: 56, Issue:5
Mechanism of retinoid X receptor partial agonistic action of 1-(3,5,5,8,8-pentamethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-naphthyl)-1H-benzotriazole-5-carboxylic acid and structural development to increase potency.
AID705481Binding affinity to mouse multiple PDZ domain protein by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID605752Antidiabetic activity in ZDF rat assessed as body weight gain at 3 mg/kg, po QD for 40 days measured on day 6 (Rvb = 133+/-9 g)2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-23, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Discovery of a series of imidazo[4,5-b]pyridines with dual activity at angiotensin II type 1 receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ.
AID1673238Binding affinity to PPARgamma (unknown origin) by TR-FRET assay2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-01, Volume: 27, Issue:13
2-Phenyl-8-(1-phenylallyl)-chromenone compounds have a pan-PPAR modulator pharmacophore.
AID761961Antiinflammatory activity in human THP1 cells assessed as inhibition of PMA-induced MCP-1 secretion preincubated for 1 hr prior PMA-challenge measured after 48 hrs by ELISA2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 66Novel 2-(2,4-dioxo-1,3-thiazolidin-5-yl)acetamides as antioxidant and/or anti-inflammatory compounds.
AID1593002Transactivation of GAL4 DBD-fused human PPARgamma LBD expressed in HEK293 cells at 10 uM after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 167Shooting three inflammatory targets with a single bullet: Novel multi-targeting anti-inflammatory glitazones.
AID1424217Cytotoxic activity in human MDA-MB-231 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 3 days by MTT assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-16, Volume: 133Novel 2,4- thiazolidinediones: Synthesis, in vitro cytotoxic activity, and mechanistic investigation.
AID91246Agonist activity for Human PPAR gamma receptor in transcriptional activation assay2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-24, Volume: 43, Issue:4
The PPARs: from orphan receptors to drug discovery.
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID665290Hypoglycemic activity in alloxan-induced diabetic Wistar rat model assessed as reduction in plasma glucose level at 100 mg/kg, po for 15 days measured on day 152012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 53Synthesis, hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic activities of novel thiazolidinedione derivatives containing thiazole/triazole/oxadiazole ring.
AID1443980Inhibition of human BSEP expressed in fall armyworm sf9 cell plasma membrane vesicles assessed as reduction in vesicle-associated [3H]-taurocholate transport preincubated for 10 mins prior to ATP addition measured after 15 mins in presence of [3H]-tauroch2010Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Dec, Volume: 118, Issue:2
Interference with bile salt export pump function is a susceptibility factor for human liver injury in drug development.
AID157099Binding affinity to human Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma using scintillation proximity assay2001Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-17, Volume: 11, Issue:24
Synthesis and biological activity of L-tyrosine-based PPARgamma agonists with reduced molecular weight.
AID1166250Antidiabetic activity in streptozotocin induced diabetic Albino Wistar rat model assessed as blood glucose level at 36 mg/kg, po by glucose oxidase method2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-24, Volume: 87Design, synthesis, in silico molecular docking and biological evaluation of novel oxadiazole based thiazolidine-2,4-diones bis-heterocycles as PPAR-γ agonists.
AID1451557Transactivation of PPARgamma in human HepG2 cells assessed as CD36 mRNA expression at 1 uM after 8 to 16 hrs by SYBR green based qRT-PCR analysis relative to DMSO control2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-28, Volume: 60, Issue:18
A Dual Modulator of Farnesoid X Receptor and Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase To Counter Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.
AID480102Increase in PPARgamma mRNA levels in mouse 3T3L1 cells at 100 umol/L by RT-PCR2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 18, Issue:9
Synthesis and biological evaluation of isoflavone fatty acid esters with potential weight loss and hypolipidemic activities.
AID1918901Binding affinity to PPARdelta (unknown origin) assessed as inhibition constant by Cheng-Prusoff equation analysis2022Journal of natural products, 12-23, Volume: 85, Issue:12
Discovery of Pan-peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Modulators from an Endolichenic Fungus,
AID1546882Agonist activity at PPARalpha (unknown origin)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
The Race to Bash NASH: Emerging Targets and Drug Development in a Complex Liver Disease.
AID1572806Binding affinity to NAF1 (unknown origin) expressed in human HepG2 cells assessed as inhibition of mitochondrial respiration at 30 uM2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 04-01, Volume: 29, Issue:7
Binding of thiazolidinediones to the endoplasmic reticulum protein nutrient-deprivation autophagy factor-1.
AID476882Agonist activity at PPARgamma assessed as transcriptional activation2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 20, Issue:7
Discovery of a novel selective PPARgamma modulator from (-)-Cercosporamide derivatives.
AID1172631Agonist activity at FFAR1 (unknown origin) assessed as increase in ERK1/2 MAP kinase phosphorylation2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 24, Issue:22
Homology modeling and explicit membrane molecular dynamics simulation to delineate the mode of binding of thiazolidinediones into FFAR1 and the mechanism of receptor activation.
AID665288Hypoglycemic activity in alloxan-induced diabetic Wistar rat model assessed as reduction in plasma glucose level at 10 mg/kg, po for 15 days measured on day 152012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 53Synthesis, hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic activities of novel thiazolidinedione derivatives containing thiazole/triazole/oxadiazole ring.
AID607115Antidiabetic activity in ZDF rat assessed as triglyceride level at 3 mg/kg, po QD for 40 days (Rvb = 618+/-52 mg/dL)2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-23, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Discovery of a series of imidazo[4,5-b]pyridines with dual activity at angiotensin II type 1 receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ.
AID705500Binding affinity to triosephosphate isomerase in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis relative to rosiglitazone2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID114053Nonfasting triglycerides after 7 days treatment in male db/db mice2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID114051Nonfasting blood glucose after 7 days treatment in male db/db mice2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID705497Binding affinity to mouse mitochondrial citrate synthase by chromatographic analysis relative to rosiglitazone2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1506482Antihyperglycemic activity in db/db mouse assessed as reduction in insulin level at 10 mg/kg, po qd for 15 days
AID1217727Intrinsic clearance for reactive metabolites formation per mg of protein in human liver microsomes based on [3H]GSH adduct formation rate at 100 uM by [3H]GSH trapping assay2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID1166262Toxicity in streptozotocin induced diabetic Albino Wistar rat model assessed as induction of sinusoidal space dilation measured 5 hrs post dose by haematoxylin and eosin staining based microscopy2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-24, Volume: 87Design, synthesis, in silico molecular docking and biological evaluation of novel oxadiazole based thiazolidine-2,4-diones bis-heterocycles as PPAR-γ agonists.
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID1323834Displacement of [3H]rosiglitazone from recombinant human C-terminal His-tagged MitoNEET cytosolic domain (32 to 108 residues) expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 by scintillation proximity assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-01, Volume: 26, Issue:21
Identification of small molecules that bind to the mitochondrial protein mitoNEET.
AID590196Partial agonist activity at human PPARgamma expressed in CHO cells co-transfected with Gal4-responsive luciferase reporter plasmid after 24 hrs by transactivation assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 21, Issue:7
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of novel benzoylazole-based PPAR α/γ activators.
AID1315308Reversal of insulin resistance in leptin receptor deficient db/db C57BL/KSJ mouse assessed as improvement in HOMA index administered for 15 consecutive days relative to control2016Journal of natural products, 05-27, Volume: 79, Issue:5
Naturally Occurring Carbazole Alkaloids from Murraya koenigii as Potential Antidiabetic Agents.
AID1217710Covalent binding in human liver microsomes measured per mg of protein using radiolabelled compound at 10 uM after 1 hr incubation by liquid scintillation counting2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID1503555Cytotoxicity against human SCC15 cells transfected with PPARgamma siRNA assessed as reduction in cell viability at 50 uM after 24 hrs by resazurin reduction assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 141Anticancer properties of 4-thiazolidinone derivatives depend on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ).
AID1917380Inhibition of recombinant human MAO-B2022Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-15, Volume: 76Design, synthesis, in-vitro, in-vivo and ex-vivo pharmacology of thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives as selective and reversible monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors.
AID1231390Drug absorption in orally dosed human2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-01, Volume: 23, Issue:13
Thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives: programmed chemical weapons for key protein targets of various pathological conditions.
AID156959Receptor binding affinity to human Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma against [3H]ragalitazar radioligand2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-10, Volume: 46, Issue:8
Synthesis and biological and structural characterization of the dual-acting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha/gamma agonist ragaglitazar.
AID1333354Displacement of Fluoromone from GST-tagged recombinant human PPARgamma ligand binding domain at 10 uM by LanthaScreen TR-FRET assay relative to control2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-29, Volume: 124Evaluation of selected 3D virtual screening tools for the prospective identification of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ partial agonists.
AID115316In vivo nonfasting triglyceride in db/db mice after oral treatment2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-06, Volume: 46, Issue:23
Large dimeric ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity in vitro and in vivo.
AID705753Binding affinity to mouse mitochondrial 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase E1 component by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1193227Toxicity in eight week old female db/db mouse assessed as body weight increase at 30 mg/kg, intragastric for 3 weeks2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of GY3-based derivatives for anti-type 2 diabetes activity.
AID1224229Transactivation of PPAR-gamma (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293 cells at 10 uM after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 24, Issue:14
Thiazolidine-2,4-diones derivatives as PPAR-γ agonists: synthesis, molecular docking, in vitro and in vivo antidiabetic activity with hepatotoxicity risk evaluation and effect on PPAR-γ gene expression.
AID1614512Transactivation of full length human PPARgamma2 expressed in HEK293T cells co-expressing PPRE after 18 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-28, Volume: 62, Issue:4
Structural Basis of Altered Potency and Efficacy Displayed by a Major in Vivo Metabolite of the Antidiabetic PPARγ Drug Pioglitazone.
AID1419241Competitive displacement of fluorescently labelled PPAR tracer ligand from GST-tagged human PPARgamma ligand binding domain after 1 hr in dark by TR-FRET competitive binding assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 12-01, Volume: 26, Issue:22
PPARγ-sparing thiazolidinediones as insulin sensitizers. Design, synthesis and selection of compounds for clinical development.
AID550077Toxicity in db/db mouse assessed as effect on food intake at 41 mg/kg administered with chow diet ad for 14 days2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-01, Volume: 21, Issue:1
Development of a new class of benzoylpyrrole-based PPARα/γ activators.
AID705477Binding affinity to mouse transcription factor SOX-5 after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID1815500Anti-obesity activity in C57BL/6J mouse model of diet-induced obesity assessed as reduction in area under curve at 25 mg/kg, po dosed once daily for 28 days by insulin tolerance test2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 12-01, Volume: 53Discovery of novel, potent and orally efficacious inhibitor of neutral amino acid transporter B
AID223547In vitro transactivation using receptor transactivation assay against hPPAR gamma2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID1673226Induction of adipogenesis in human BMMSC cells assessed as increase in HMGCS2 mRNA at 1 uM incubated for 3 days by qRT-PCR analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-01, Volume: 27, Issue:13
2-Phenyl-8-(1-phenylallyl)-chromenone compounds have a pan-PPAR modulator pharmacophore.
AID1315297Antidiabetic activity in leptin receptor deficient db/db C57BL/KSJ mouse assessed as decrease in fasting blood glucose level administered for 15 consecutive days relative to control2016Journal of natural products, 05-27, Volume: 79, Issue:5
Naturally Occurring Carbazole Alkaloids from Murraya koenigii as Potential Antidiabetic Agents.
AID588209Literature-mined public compounds from Greene et al multi-species hepatotoxicity modelling dataset2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jul-19, Volume: 23, Issue:7
Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
AID1673240Binding affinity to PPARalpha (unknown origin) by TR-FRET assay2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-01, Volume: 27, Issue:13
2-Phenyl-8-(1-phenylallyl)-chromenone compounds have a pan-PPAR modulator pharmacophore.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID662860Inhibition of human MAOA expressed in Pichia pastoris at 100 uM2011ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-15, Volume: 3, Issue:1
Molecular Insights into Human Monoamine Oxidase B Inhibition by the Glitazone Anti-Diabetes Drugs.
AID1409609Cytotoxicity of compound against Vero E6 cells by MTT assay.2020Nature, 07, Volume: 583, Issue:7816
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.
AID503296Agonist activity at PPARgamma expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as induction of receptor interaction with steroid receptor coactivator-1 by EYFP based reporter gene assay2006Nature chemical biology, Jun, Volume: 2, Issue:6
Identifying off-target effects and hidden phenotypes of drugs in human cells.
AID1651571Activation of human PPARgamma expressed in HEK293 cells at 3 uM incubated for 18 hrs by luciferase reporter assay relative to control2020Journal of natural products, 04-24, Volume: 83, Issue:4
Polyacetylenes from
AID1409296Transactivation of GAL4-fused human PPARgamma transfected in HEK293BENA cells at 1 uM after 24 hrs by steady glo-luciferase reporter gene assay relative to pioglitazone
AID3423Effective concentration for 50% enhancement of insulin-induced triglyceride accumulation in 3T3-L1 cells1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-21, Volume: 41, Issue:11
Isoxazolidine-3,5-dione and noncyclic 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds as hypoglycemic agents.
AID699008Agonist activity at human PPARgamma expressed in human HEK293 cells at 100 nM by luciferase reporter gene assay relative to vehicle-treated control2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 22, Issue:8
Sesquiterpene lactones from Tithonia diversifolia act as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists.
AID440905Inhibition of PTP1B2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 19, Issue:21
Thiazolidinedione derivatives as PTP1B inhibitors with antihyperglycemic and antiobesity effects.
AID1420544Toxicity in db/db mouse model assessed as suppression of weight gain at 20 mg/kg, po qd measured after 11 days2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 10-15, Volume: 28, Issue:19
Discovery of the bifunctional modulator of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) and PPARγ derived from the AT1R antagonist, Fimasartan.
AID1662161Antidiabetic activity in KK-A y mouse assessed as reduction in glucose levels2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 03-01, Volume: 28, Issue:5
Anti-diabetic drugs recent approaches and advancements.
AID1323084Upregulation of ABCG1 mRNA expression in human THP1 cells at 10 uM after 24 hrs by qPCR method relative to control2016Journal of natural products, 06-24, Volume: 79, Issue:6
Leoligin, the Major Lignan from Edelweiss (Leontopodium nivale subsp. alpinum), Promotes Cholesterol Efflux from THP-1 Macrophages.
AID1335099Antidiabetic activity in diet-induced obese mouse assessed as insulin sensitivity by measuring reduction in glucose at 10 mg/kg, po qd administered daily via gavage for 14 days measured on day 14 post dose2017ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-12, Volume: 8, Issue:1
Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Novel and Selective G-protein Coupled Receptor 120 (GPR120) Spirocyclic Agonists.
AID705486Binding affinity to mouse cardiotrophin-like cytokine factor 1 by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID119519In vivo decrease in glucose in obese mice(ob/ob) at 10 mg/kg/day peroral administration for 2 weeks1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-22, Volume: 9, Issue:4
(3-substituted benzyl)thiazolidine-2,4-diones as structurally new antihyperglycemic agents.
AID590208Antidiabetic effect in db/db mouse assessed as reduction in plasma triglyceride level at 30 mg/kg/day, po administered daily for 14 days2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 21, Issue:7
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of novel benzoylazole-based PPAR α/γ activators.
AID372084Antihyperglycemic activity in db/db mouse assessed as plasma adiponectin level at 75 mg/kg, po administered once daily for 11 days by RIA2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-09, Volume: 52, Issue:13
Discovery of (2R)-2-(3-{3-[(4-Methoxyphenyl)carbonyl]-2-methyl-6-(trifluoromethoxy)-1H-indol-1-yl}phenoxy)butanoic acid (MK-0533): a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma modulator for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus w
AID661075Antidiabetic activity in mouse 3T3L1 cells assessed as decrease in glucose consumption from cell culture medium using 450 mg/dL D-glucose at 30 ug/mL after 24 hrs (Rvb = 310 +/- 4 mg/dl)2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-15, Volume: 22, Issue:12
Synthesis of chalcone derivatives as potential anti-diabetic agents.
AID705511Binding affinity to hemopexin precursor in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1129262Agonist activity at human PPAR-gamma expressed in HEK293 cells at 5 uM after 18 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay in presence of T00709072014Journal of natural products, Apr-25, Volume: 77, Issue:4
Identification of isosilybin a from milk thistle seeds as an agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma.
AID1217708Time dependent inhibition of CYP2D6 (unknown origin) at 100 uM by LC/MS system2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID1473999Drug concentration at steady state in human at 15 to 60 mg, po QD after 24 hrs2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1535277Antidiabetic activity in db/db mouse assessed as random blood glucose level at 20 mg/kg, po administered once daily for 13 days measured post last dose (Rvb = 530 mg/dl)2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 02-15, Volume: 29, Issue:4
Identification of BR101549 as a lead candidate of non-TZD PPARγ agonist for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: Proof-of-concept evaluation and SAR.
AID699539Inhibition of human liver OATP1B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID237836In vivo blood glucose level was observed in ZDF rats 4 weeks after oral administration (once daily) of 30 mg/kg of compound; (n=6)2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 15, Issue:3
Identification of putative metabolites of docosahexaenoic acid as potent PPARgamma agonists and antidiabetic agents.
AID1276054Transactivation of human PPARalpha expressed in African green monkey COS7 cells incubated overnight by dual-glo luciferase reporter gene assay2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 59, Issue:1
N-Benzylbenzamides: A Novel Merged Scaffold for Orally Available Dual Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase/Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Modulators.
AID1614507Activation of human 6His-tagged PPARgamma isoform 1 LBD (203 to 477 residues) expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) assessed as increase in FITC-TRAP220 peptide recruitment after 1 hr by FITC/TR-FRET assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-28, Volume: 62, Issue:4
Structural Basis of Altered Potency and Efficacy Displayed by a Major in Vivo Metabolite of the Antidiabetic PPARγ Drug Pioglitazone.
AID1741907Inhibition of PTP1B in human HepG2 cells assessed as improvement in insulin-induced 2-NBDG uptake at 10 uM incubated for 24 hrs prior to compound washout followed by insulin stimulation for 20 mins and subsequent 2-NBDG addition measured after 60 mins by 2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 205Synthesis and biological evaluation of geniposide derivatives as potent and selective PTPlB inhibitors.
AID124441Maximum achieved insulin reduction relative to vehicle treated control group2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID1193226Hypoglycemic effect in eight week old female db/db mouse assessed as reduction in blood glucose level at 30 mg/kg, intragastric for 3 weeks2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of GY3-based derivatives for anti-type 2 diabetes activity.
AID1383694Hypoglycemic activity in db/db mouse assessed as decrease in blood glucose level at 30 mg/kg, po treated for 1 week measured at 3 hrs post last dose (Rvb = 0.0 +/- 8.6%)2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Discovery of tetrahydrocarbazoles with potent hypoglycemic and hypolipemic activities.
AID590212Partial agonist activity at human PPARalpha expressed in CHO cells co-transfected with Gal4-responsive luciferase reporter plasmid after 24 hrs by transactivation assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 21, Issue:7
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of novel benzoylazole-based PPAR α/γ activators.
AID1424218Cytotoxic activity in human HT1080 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 3 days by MTT assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-16, Volume: 133Novel 2,4- thiazolidinediones: Synthesis, in vitro cytotoxic activity, and mechanistic investigation.
AID1409613Selectivity ratio: ratio of AUC (viral infection %) of SARS-CoV-2 in the Vero E6 cell line compared to AUC (cytotoxicity %) of compound against Vero E6 cells by MTT assay.2020Nature, 07, Volume: 583, Issue:7816
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.
AID662859Competitive inhibition of rat MAOB expressed in Pichia pastoris2011ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-15, Volume: 3, Issue:1
Molecular Insights into Human Monoamine Oxidase B Inhibition by the Glitazone Anti-Diabetes Drugs.
AID91238Agonist activity for Human PPAR alpha receptor in transcriptional activation assay; IA means inactive at 10 uM2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-24, Volume: 43, Issue:4
The PPARs: from orphan receptors to drug discovery.
AID1397117Agonist activity at PPARgamma in human HepG2 cells assessed as activation of PPRE incubated for 24 hrs by dual luciferase reporter gene assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-07, Volume: 26, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, and evaluation of novel l-phenylglycine derivatives as potential PPARγ lead compounds.
AID1217707Time dependent inhibition of CYP2C19 in human liver microsomes at 100 uM by LC/MS system2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID614594Modulation of human PPARgamma-LBD expressed in african green monkey COS7 cells co-transfected with Gal4 assessed as activation of transactivation activity by luciferase assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Sep-15, Volume: 19, Issue:18
SAR studies of acidic dual γ-secretase/PPARγ modulators.
AID1169794Agonist activity at human PPARgamma expressed in HEK293 cells incubated for 18 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay2014Journal of natural products, Nov-26, Volume: 77, Issue:11
Polyyne hybrid compounds from Notopterygium incisum with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonistic effects.
AID1428293Agonist activity at GST-tagged human recombinant PPARgamma-LBD assessed as fluorescein-labeled corepressor NCoR1 release by lanthascreen TR-FRET assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 126Importance of 5/6-aryl substitution on the pharmacological profile of 4'-((2-propyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)methyl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-2-carboxylic acid derived PPARγ agonists.
AID705488Binding affinity to afadin- and alpha-actinin-binding protein in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1424225Increase in p21(WAF1) protein expression in human MDA-MB-231 cells at 50 uM incubated for 24 hrs by Western blot analysis2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-16, Volume: 133Novel 2,4- thiazolidinediones: Synthesis, in vitro cytotoxic activity, and mechanistic investigation.
AID1614511Binding affinity to human 6His-tagged PPARgamma LBD expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) using FITC-NTKNHPMLMNLLKDNPAQD peptide by isothermal titration calorimetry2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-28, Volume: 62, Issue:4
Structural Basis of Altered Potency and Efficacy Displayed by a Major in Vivo Metabolite of the Antidiabetic PPARγ Drug Pioglitazone.
AID678719Metabolic stability in human liver microsomes assessed as medium signal/noise ratio (S/N of 10 to 100) by measuring GSH adduct formation at 100 uM after 90 mins by HPLC-MS analysis2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1237265Agonist activity at PPARgamma (unknown origin)2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-01, Volume: 25, Issue:15
Discovery of imidazo[1,5-a]pyridines and -pyrimidines as potent and selective RORc inverse agonists.
AID1506470Antihyperglycemic activity in db/db mouse assessed as reduction in triglyceride level at 10 mg/kg, po qd for 15 days
AID503297Agonist activity at PPARgamma expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as induction of receptor interaction with retinoid X-receptor alpha by EYFP based reporter gene assay2006Nature chemical biology, Jun, Volume: 2, Issue:6
Identifying off-target effects and hidden phenotypes of drugs in human cells.
AID1918899Binding affinity to PPARalpha (unknown origin) assessed as inhibition constant by Cheng-Prusoff equation analysis2022Journal of natural products, 12-23, Volume: 85, Issue:12
Discovery of Pan-peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Modulators from an Endolichenic Fungus,
AID157282Displacement of [3H]-BRL 49653 from glutathione S-transferase-Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma ligand binding domain in bacterial extracts1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-02, Volume: 39, Issue:3
The structure-activity relationship between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonism and the antihyperglycemic activity of thiazolidinediones.
AID1614510Displacement of FITC-NCoR1 peptide from human PPARgamma LBD expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) by FP assay (Rvb = 1.7 uM)2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-28, Volume: 62, Issue:4
Structural Basis of Altered Potency and Efficacy Displayed by a Major in Vivo Metabolite of the Antidiabetic PPARγ Drug Pioglitazone.
AID614596Modulation of human PPARgamma-LBD expressed in african green monkey COS7 cells co-transfected with Gal4 assessed as activation of transactivation activity at 1 uM by luciferase assay relative to control2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Sep-15, Volume: 19, Issue:18
SAR studies of acidic dual γ-secretase/PPARγ modulators.
AID1701615Binding affinity to PPAR-alpha (unknown origin) assessed as ligand replacement at 30 uM by TR-FRET assay relative to control
AID665287Hypoglycemic activity in alloxan-induced diabetic Wistar rat model assessed as reduction in plasma glucose level at 3 mg/kg, po for 15 days measured on day 152012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 53Synthesis, hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic activities of novel thiazolidinedione derivatives containing thiazole/triazole/oxadiazole ring.
AID730268Toxicity against KKAy mouse assessed as plasma triglyceride level at 10 mg/kg/day, po for 14 days (Rvb = 122.4 +/- 11.0 mg/dL)2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-14, Volume: 56, Issue:5
Mechanism of retinoid X receptor partial agonistic action of 1-(3,5,5,8,8-pentamethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-naphthyl)-1H-benzotriazole-5-carboxylic acid and structural development to increase potency.
AID1428292Agonist activity at GST-tagged human recombinant PPARgamma-LBD assessed as fluorescein-labeled coactivator PGC-1alpha recruitment by lanthascreen TR-FRET assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 126Importance of 5/6-aryl substitution on the pharmacological profile of 4'-((2-propyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)methyl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-2-carboxylic acid derived PPARγ agonists.
AID156285Receptor binding affinity to human Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha against [3H]-NNC 0061-4655 radioligand2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-10, Volume: 46, Issue:8
Synthesis and biological and structural characterization of the dual-acting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha/gamma agonist ragaglitazar.
AID3420Compound was tested for insulin-sensitizing activity by measuring triglyceride accumulation from insulin regulated differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells at 10 uM expressed as percent activity of pioglitazone2000Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-06, Volume: 10, Issue:21
Hybridization of non-sulfonylurea insulin secretagogue and thiazolidinedione-derived insulin sensitizer.
AID648526Agonist activity at GAL4-tagged human PPARgamma ligand binding domain expressed in HepG2 cells assessed as transactivation after 20 hrs by beta-galactosidase reporter gene assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular investigation of fluorinated peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors α/γ dual agonists.
AID756998Inhibition of C-terminal His6-tagged Francisella tularensis SCHU S4 FabI expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) using CrCoA as substrate assessed as oxidation of NADH to NAD+ by fluorescence assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-11, Volume: 56, Issue:13
3-substituted indole inhibitors against Francisella tularensis FabI identified by structure-based virtual screening.
AID1166255Hepatoprotective effect in streptozotocin induced diabetic Albino Wistar rat model assessed as reduction in serum AST level2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-24, Volume: 87Design, synthesis, in silico molecular docking and biological evaluation of novel oxadiazole based thiazolidine-2,4-diones bis-heterocycles as PPAR-γ agonists.
AID1224234Hepatotoxicity in streptozotocin-induced in Albino Wistar rat diabetic model assessed as hepatocyte swelling by Haematoxylin/Eosin staining-based microscopy2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 24, Issue:14
Thiazolidine-2,4-diones derivatives as PPAR-γ agonists: synthesis, molecular docking, in vitro and in vivo antidiabetic activity with hepatotoxicity risk evaluation and effect on PPAR-γ gene expression.
AID1918904Partial agonist activity at PPARgamma (unknown origin) assessed as increase in fluorescein labeled PRIP/RAP250 coactivator peptide requirement by Lanthascreen TR-FRET assay2022Journal of natural products, 12-23, Volume: 85, Issue:12
Discovery of Pan-peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Modulators from an Endolichenic Fungus,
AID115314In vivo insulin effect in db/db mice after oral treatment2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-06, Volume: 46, Issue:23
Large dimeric ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity in vitro and in vivo.
AID1737435Agonist activity at human PPARgammaDEF receptor expressed in african green monkey COS7 cells transfected with pGal5-TK-pGL3/pRenilla-CMV assessed as intrinsic activity measured after 39 hrs by dual luciferase reporter assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 195Identification and development of non-cytotoxic cell death modulators: Impact of sartans and derivatives on PPARγ activation and on growth of imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.
AID124442Maximum achieved triglycerides reduction relative to vehicle treated control group2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID705480Binding affinity to neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha-10 in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1578134Induction of sensitization to imatinib-induced cytotoxicity in imatinib-resistant human K562-IMA[r] cells assessed as cell death at 0.1 to 10 uM measured after 72 hrs in presence of 1 uM imatinib by propidium iodide/Triton-X100 dye based FACS analysis2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 185Overcoming imatinib resistance in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells using non-cytotoxic cell death modulators.
AID29634Oral bioavailability2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID1428290Transactivation of Gal4 fused human PPARgamma LBD expressed in African green monkey COS7 cells after 42 hrs by dual luciferase reporter gene assay relative to pioglitazone2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 126Importance of 5/6-aryl substitution on the pharmacological profile of 4'-((2-propyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)methyl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-2-carboxylic acid derived PPARγ agonists.
AID705487Binding affinity to mouse bullous pemphigoid antigen 1 by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1383693Hypoglycemic activity in db/db mouse assessed as decrease in blood glucose level at 30 mg/kg, po administered as single dose measured at 3 hrs post last dose (Rvb = 0.0 +/- 4.1%)2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Discovery of tetrahydrocarbazoles with potent hypoglycemic and hypolipemic activities.
AID705484Binding affinity to Huntingtin-associated protein-interacting protein in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1623712Inhibition of PTP1B in human HepG2 cells assessed as increase in insulin stimulated glucose uptake at 10 uM preincubated for 24 hrs followed by insulin addition and measured after 10 mins by 2-NBDG dye-based FACS analysis relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Investigation of stereoisomeric bisarylethenesulfonic acid esters for discovering potent and selective PTP1B inhibitors.
AID421054Antidiabetic activity in C57BLKS/J-m+/+Leprdb db/db mouse assessed as reduction in plasma triglyceride levels at 10 mg/kg, po once daily for 11 days relative to control2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-23, Volume: 52, Issue:14
Discovery of a peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) modulator with balanced PPARalpha activity for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia.
AID1503563Downregulation of PPARgamma mRNA expression in human SCC15 cells at 50 uM after 4 hrs by RTqPCR analysis relative to control2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 141Anticancer properties of 4-thiazolidinone derivatives depend on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ).
AID709646Transactivation of GAL4-fused human PPARgamma ligand binding domain transfected in african green monkey COS7 cells by luciferase reporter gene assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of dual modulators of soluble epoxide hydrolase and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors.
AID114006Effective dose for 50% blood glucose decrease in genetically diabetic KKA mice.1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-21, Volume: 41, Issue:11
Isoxazolidine-3,5-dione and noncyclic 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds as hypoglycemic agents.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID421053Antidiabetic activity in C57BLKS/J-m+/+Leprdb db/db mouse assessed as reduction in plasma glucose levels at 10 mg/kg, po once daily for 11 days relative to control2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-23, Volume: 52, Issue:14
Discovery of a peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) modulator with balanced PPARalpha activity for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia.
AID28299Maximum plasma concentration after oral administration at a dose 2.2 mg/kg2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID1636357Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 300 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of NA2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID1383697Toxicity in db/db mouse assessed as increase in body weight at 30 mg/kg, po treated for 1 to 3 weeks measured at 3 hrs post last dose relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Discovery of tetrahydrocarbazoles with potent hypoglycemic and hypolipemic activities.
AID28252Oral half life was reported2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID1333353Transactivation of GAL4-fused human PPARgamma ligand binding domain expressed in African green monkey COS7 cells after 42 hrs by dual luciferase reporter gene assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-29, Volume: 124Evaluation of selected 3D virtual screening tools for the prospective identification of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ partial agonists.
AID1276055Transactivation of human PPARdelta expressed in African green monkey COS7 cells incubated overnight by dual-glo luciferase reporter gene assay2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 59, Issue:1
N-Benzylbenzamides: A Novel Merged Scaffold for Orally Available Dual Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase/Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Modulators.
AID1614509Displacement of FITC-TRAP220 peptide from human 6His-tagged PPARgamma isoform 1 LBD (203 to 477 residues) expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) by FP assay (Rvb = 2.7 uM)2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-28, Volume: 62, Issue:4
Structural Basis of Altered Potency and Efficacy Displayed by a Major in Vivo Metabolite of the Antidiabetic PPARγ Drug Pioglitazone.
AID110045Effective dose for 25% blood glucose decrease in genetically diabetic KKA mice.1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-21, Volume: 41, Issue:11
Isoxazolidine-3,5-dione and noncyclic 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds as hypoglycemic agents.
AID1677033Antiproliferative activity against human MCF7 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 12-01, Volume: 30, Issue:23
Benzylidene thiazolidinediones: Synthesis, in vitro investigations of antiproliferative mechanisms and in vivo efficacy determination in combination with Imatinib.
AID699016Inhibition of fluormone binding to human PPARgamma LBD after 2 hrs by competitive fluorescence polarization assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 22, Issue:8
Sesquiterpene lactones from Tithonia diversifolia act as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists.
AID1662165Induction of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in human HepG2 cells at 20 uM relative to control2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 03-01, Volume: 28, Issue:5
Anti-diabetic drugs recent approaches and advancements.
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1578133Cytotoxicity against imatinib-resistant human K562-IMA[r] cells assessed as cell death at 10 uM after 72 hrs by propidium iodide/Triton-X100 dye based FACS analysis2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 185Overcoming imatinib resistance in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells using non-cytotoxic cell death modulators.
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID761962Antiinflammatory activity in human THP1 cells assessed as inhibition of PMA-induced IL-1beta secretion preincubated for 1 hr prior PMA-challenge measured after 48 hrs by ELISA2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 66Novel 2-(2,4-dioxo-1,3-thiazolidin-5-yl)acetamides as antioxidant and/or anti-inflammatory compounds.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1424226Increase in p21(WAF1) protein expression in human HT1080 cells at 50 uM incubated for 24 hrs by Western blot analysis2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-16, Volume: 133Novel 2,4- thiazolidinediones: Synthesis, in vitro cytotoxic activity, and mechanistic investigation.
AID1870358Induction of adipogenesis in human differentiated BMMSC cells assessed as fold increase in adiponectin production at 10 uM measured on 5 day in presence of IDX induction medium by ELISA2022ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-14, Volume: 13, Issue:7
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Activity of l-1'-Homologated Adenosine Derivatives.
AID1209456Inhibition of Sprague-Dawley rat Bsep expressed in plasma membrane vesicles of Sf21 cells assessed as inhibition of ATP-dependent [3H]taurocholate uptake2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 40, Issue:1
In vitro inhibition of the bile salt export pump correlates with risk of cholestatic drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID1443995Hepatotoxicity in human assessed as drug-induced liver injury2014Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), Sep, Volume: 60, Issue:3
Human drug-induced liver injury severity is highly associated with dual inhibition of liver mitochondrial function and bile salt export pump.
AID1519402Inhibition of DPP4 in human serum assessed as decrease in p-nitroaniline formation using Gly-Pro-p-nitroanilide as substrate preincubated for 5 mins followed by incubation with substrate for 15 mins by microplate reader analysis
AID1593001Induction of PPARgamma nuclear translocation in rat primary adipocytes at 10 uM incubated for 3 hrs by DAPI/FITC staining based immunofluorescence method2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 167Shooting three inflammatory targets with a single bullet: Novel multi-targeting anti-inflammatory glitazones.
AID678714Inhibition of human CYP2C19 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 3-butyryl-7-methoxycoumarin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID548199Partial agonist activity at human PPARgamma-LBD expressed in HEK293T cells assessed as induction of receptor transactivation at 1 uM after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
1,3-Diphenyl-1H-pyrazole derivatives as a new series of potent PPARγ partial agonists.
AID136633Percent reduction in area under glucose tolerance curve (AUC) was determined at 100 umol/kg dose of diet in mice; IA = No significant activity1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-11, Volume: 37, Issue:23
[[omega-(Heterocyclylamino)alkoxy]benzyl]-2,4-thiazolidinediones as potent antihyperglycemic agents.
AID601558Glucose consumption in differentiated mouse 3T3L1 cells in high-glucose medium at 100 ug/ml after 24 hrs by glucose-oxidase method (Rvb =3.12 +/- 0.32 mmol/L)2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 19, Issue:10
Synthesis and biological evaluation of new flavonoid fatty acid esters with anti-adipogenic and enhancing glucose consumption activities.
AID136634Percent reduction in area under glucose tolerance curve (AUC) was determined at 1000 umol/kg dose of diet in mice1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-11, Volume: 37, Issue:23
[[omega-(Heterocyclylamino)alkoxy]benzyl]-2,4-thiazolidinediones as potent antihyperglycemic agents.
AID1592993Inhibition of PMA-induced human THP1 monocytes differentiation in to macrophages assessed as macrophage metabolic activity up to 300 uM preincubated for 6 hrs before PMA stimulation2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 167Shooting three inflammatory targets with a single bullet: Novel multi-targeting anti-inflammatory glitazones.
AID1737437Cytotoxicity against African green monkey COS7 cells assessed as effect on metabolic activity at 20 uM measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 195Identification and development of non-cytotoxic cell death modulators: Impact of sartans and derivatives on PPARγ activation and on growth of imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.
AID1335101Antidiabetic activity in diet-induced obese mouse assessed as insulin sensitivity by measuring reduction in glucose at 10 mg/kg, po qd administered daily via gavage for 28 days measured on day 28 post dose2017ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-12, Volume: 8, Issue:1
Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Novel and Selective G-protein Coupled Receptor 120 (GPR120) Spirocyclic Agonists.
AID268111Transactivation of PPARgamma in CV1 cells2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-13, Volume: 49, Issue:14
Design and synthesis of the first generation of dithiolane thiazolidinedione- and phenylacetic acid-based PPARgamma agonists.
AID237838In vivo blood glucose level was observed in db/db mouse 4 weeks after oral administration (once daily) of 100 mg/kg of compound; (n=6)2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 15, Issue:3
Identification of putative metabolites of docosahexaenoic acid as potent PPARgamma agonists and antidiabetic agents.
AID550058Agonist activity at human PPARgamma ligand binding domain expressed in COS-1 cells co-transfected with Gal4 by luciferase reporter gene assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-01, Volume: 21, Issue:1
Development of a new class of benzoylpyrrole-based PPARα/γ activators.
AID601631Glucose consumption in differentiated mouse 3T3L1 cells in high-glucose medium after 24 hrs by glucose-oxidase method2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 19, Issue:10
Synthesis and biological evaluation of new flavonoid fatty acid esters with anti-adipogenic and enhancing glucose consumption activities.
AID1409607IC50 for antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 in the Vero E6 cell line at 48 h by immunofluorescence-based assay (detecting the viral NP protein in the nucleus of the Vero E6 cells).2020Nature, 07, Volume: 583, Issue:7816
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.
AID109805Blood glucose level of the diabetic KK-Ay mice on day 4 was measured2003Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 13, Issue:24
Phenolics with PPAR-gamma ligand-binding activity obtained from licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis roots) and ameliorative effects of glycyrin on genetically diabetic KK-A(y) mice.
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID136642Percent reduction in area under glucose tolerance curve (AUC) was determined at 3000 umol/kg dose of diet in mice1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-11, Volume: 37, Issue:23
[[omega-(Heterocyclylamino)alkoxy]benzyl]-2,4-thiazolidinediones as potent antihyperglycemic agents.
AID705499Binding affinity to creatine kinase M-type in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis relative to rosiglitazone2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID678722Covalent binding affinity to human liver microsomes assessed per mg of protein at 10 uM after 60 mins presence of NADPH2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID372078Antihyperglycemic activity in db/db mouse assessed as reduction in blood glucose level at 75 mg/kg, po administered once daily for 11 days2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-09, Volume: 52, Issue:13
Discovery of (2R)-2-(3-{3-[(4-Methoxyphenyl)carbonyl]-2-methyl-6-(trifluoromethoxy)-1H-indol-1-yl}phenoxy)butanoic acid (MK-0533): a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma modulator for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus w
AID156943In vitro transactivation of human Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-06, Volume: 46, Issue:23
Large dimeric ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity in vitro and in vivo.
AID156241In vitro transcriptional activation of peroxisome proliferator activated delta-receptor (PPAR) expressed in CV-1 cells; Inactive1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-02, Volume: 39, Issue:3
The structure-activity relationship between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonism and the antihyperglycemic activity of thiazolidinediones.
AID648527Agonist activity at GAL4-tagged human PPARalpha ligand binding domain expressed in HepG2 cells assessed as transactivation at 5 to 10 uM after 20 hrs by beta-galactosidase reporter gene assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular investigation of fluorinated peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors α/γ dual agonists.
AID1506473Antihyperglycemic activity in db/db mouse assessed as reduction in cholesterol level at 10 mg/kg, po qd for 15 days
AID705505Binding affinity to PX domain-containing protein kinase-like protein in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis relative to pioglitazone2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1335104Decrease in insulin levels in diet-induced obese mouse at 10 mg/kg, po qd administered daily via gavage for 28 days measured on day 28 post dose2017ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-12, Volume: 8, Issue:1
Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Novel and Selective G-protein Coupled Receptor 120 (GPR120) Spirocyclic Agonists.
AID499442Activation of Gal4-tagged human PPARgamma expressed in CHO cells by luciferase reporter gene assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 18, Issue:16
Characterization of new PPARgamma agonists: benzimidazole derivatives-importance of positions 5 and 6, and computational studies on the binding mode.
AID550057Agonist activity at human PPARgamma ligand binding domain expressed in COS-1 cells co-transfected with Gal4 at 10 uM by luciferase reporter gene assay relative to control2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-01, Volume: 21, Issue:1
Development of a new class of benzoylpyrrole-based PPARα/γ activators.
AID1673225Induction of adipogenesis in human BMMSC cells assessed as increase in ACACB mRNA at 1 uM incubated for 3 days by qRT-PCR analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-01, Volume: 27, Issue:13
2-Phenyl-8-(1-phenylallyl)-chromenone compounds have a pan-PPAR modulator pharmacophore.
AID114052Nonfasting insulin after 7 days treatment in male db/db mice2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID1701618Binding affinity to PPAR-delta (unknown origin) assessed as ligand replacement at 30 uM by TR-FRET assay relative to control
AID115313Area under blood glucose time curve after oral glucose test in mice2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-06, Volume: 46, Issue:23
Large dimeric ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity in vitro and in vivo.
AID243367Activation of PPAR gamma at 5 uM in Cos-7 cell reporter gene assay with 5%FBS2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 15, Issue:3
Identification of putative metabolites of docosahexaenoic acid as potent PPARgamma agonists and antidiabetic agents.
AID1217704Time dependent inhibition of CYP1A2 (unknown origin) at 100 uM by LC/MS system2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID1276057Transactivation of human PPARalpha expressed in African green monkey COS7 cells incubated overnight by dual-glo luciferase reporter assay relative to GW76472016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 59, Issue:1
N-Benzylbenzamides: A Novel Merged Scaffold for Orally Available Dual Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase/Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Modulators.
AID1169796Agonist activity at human PPARgamma expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as induction of receptor activation at 5 uM incubated for 18 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay relative to untreated control2014Journal of natural products, Nov-26, Volume: 77, Issue:11
Polyyne hybrid compounds from Notopterygium incisum with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonistic effects.
AID1815499Anti-obesity activity in high fat diet induced C57BL/6J mouse model assessed as change in body weight at 25 mg/kg, po dosed once daily for 28 days2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 12-01, Volume: 53Discovery of novel, potent and orally efficacious inhibitor of neutral amino acid transporter B
AID1634122Antidiabetic activity in db/db mouse assessed as reduction in blood glucose level at 30 mg/kg, po administered daily once for 2 weeks and measured on day 14 by OGTT method2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 29, Issue:16
Discovery of BR102375, a new class of non-TZD PPARγ full agonist for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
AID156931Maximal reporter activity against human Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma Gal4 chimeric in transiently transfected CV-1 cells by functional assay.2001Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-17, Volume: 11, Issue:24
Synthesis and biological activity of L-tyrosine-based PPARgamma agonists with reduced molecular weight.
AID1503552Cytotoxicity against human SCC15 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability at 50 uM after 24 hrs by resazurin reduction assay relative to control2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 141Anticancer properties of 4-thiazolidinone derivatives depend on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ).
AID699012Agonist activity at human PPARgamma expressed in human HEK293 cells assessed as ABCA1 promoter transactivation at 100 nM by luciferase reporter gene assay relative to vehicle-treated control2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 22, Issue:8
Sesquiterpene lactones from Tithonia diversifolia act as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists.
AID91243Agonist activity for Human PPAR delta receptor in transcriptional activation assay; IA means inactive at 10 uM2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-24, Volume: 43, Issue:4
The PPARs: from orphan receptors to drug discovery.
AID1383698Hypolipemic activity in db/db mouse assessed as plasma fasting triglyceride level at 30 mg/kg, po treated for 3 consecutive weeks (Rvb = 0.70 to 0.97 mM)2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Discovery of tetrahydrocarbazoles with potent hypoglycemic and hypolipemic activities.
AID25727Area under plasma concentration time curve after oral administration at a dose 2.2 mg/kg2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID705493Binding affinity to focal adhesion kinase 2 in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1737436Cytotoxicity against African green monkey COS7 cells assessed as effect on metabolic activity at 10 uM measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 195Identification and development of non-cytotoxic cell death modulators: Impact of sartans and derivatives on PPARγ activation and on growth of imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.
AID1737434Agonist activity at human PPARgammaDEF receptor expressed in african green monkey COS7 cells transfected with pGal5-TK-pGL3/pRenilla-CMV assessed as maximal activation at 10 uM measured after 39 hrs by dual luciferase reporter assay relative to pioglitazo2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 195Identification and development of non-cytotoxic cell death modulators: Impact of sartans and derivatives on PPARγ activation and on growth of imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.
AID1419242Transactivation of GAL4-DBD fused human PPARgamma ligand binding domain expressed in UAS-bla HEL 293H cells preincubated for 16 hrs followed by FRET substrate addition and measured after 2 hrs by TR-FRET assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 12-01, Volume: 26, Issue:22
PPARγ-sparing thiazolidinediones as insulin sensitizers. Design, synthesis and selection of compounds for clinical development.
AID1506460Antihyperglycemic activity in db/db mouse assessed as improvement on glucose tolerance by measuring blood glucose AUC level at 10 mg/kg, po qd for 10 days by oral glucose tolerance test
AID705736Binding affinity to mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID111650Antihyperglycemic activity was determined in obese (ob/ob) mice by po administration at a dose of 10 mg/kg1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-22, Volume: 9, Issue:4
(3-substituted benzyl)thiazolidine-2,4-diones as structurally new antihyperglycemic agents.
AID1578127Transactivation of Gal4-fused human PPARgamma transfected in COS7 cells co-transfected with pGAL5-TK-pGL3 and pRennilla-CMV incubated for 39 hrs by dual luciferase reporter assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 185Overcoming imatinib resistance in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells using non-cytotoxic cell death modulators.
AID1193224Hypoglycemic effect in eight week old female db/db mouse assessed as reduction in blood glucose level at 30 mg/kg, intragastric for 1 week2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of GY3-based derivatives for anti-type 2 diabetes activity.
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID1537168Induction of adipogenesis in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells assessed as increase in adiponectin production measured on day 5 in presence of IDX by ELISA2019Journal of natural products, 02-22, Volume: 82, Issue:2
Adiponectin-Secretion-Promoting Phenylethylchromones from the Agarwood of Aquilaria malaccensis.
AID678713Inhibition of human CYP2C9 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 7-methoxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin-3-acetic acid as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID678717Inhibition of human CYP3A4 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 7-benzyloxyquinoline as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1473835Stimulation of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID705739Binding affinity to mouse protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons protein 2 by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1466737Transactivation activity at Gal4 fused full length human PPARgamma LBD expressed in HEK293 cells after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-15, Volume: 27, Issue:12
Structure-activity relationships of rosiglitazone for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma transrepression.
AID1753288Drug metabolism in human liver microsomes assessed as NADPH-dependent covalent bond binding at 50 umol/L incubated for 1 hr in presence of NADPH by liquid scintillation counter analysis
AID1519405Anti-glycation activity assessed as inhibition of AGE formation by measuring decrease in glycated BSA protein level at 1000 uM incubated for 24 hrs in presence of glucose by fluorescence based assay relative to control
AID113350In vivo nonfasting triglyceride in db/db mice after oral treatment2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-06, Volume: 46, Issue:23
Large dimeric ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity in vitro and in vivo.
AID124440Maximum achieved blood glucose reduction relative to vehicle treated control group2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID709644Transactivation of GAL4-fused human PPARdelta ligand binding domain transfected in african green monkey COS7 cells by luciferase reporter gene assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of dual modulators of soluble epoxide hydrolase and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors.
AID237598In vivo body weight gain was observed in ZDF rats 4 weeks after oral administration (once daily) of 30 mg/kg of compound; (n=6)2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 15, Issue:3
Identification of putative metabolites of docosahexaenoic acid as potent PPARgamma agonists and antidiabetic agents.
AID1428289Transactivation of Gal4 fused human PPARgamma LBD expressed in African green monkey COS7 cells after 42 hrs by dual luciferase reporter gene assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 126Importance of 5/6-aryl substitution on the pharmacological profile of 4'-((2-propyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)methyl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-2-carboxylic acid derived PPARγ agonists.
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID113348In vivo insulin effect in db/db mice after oral treatment2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-06, Volume: 46, Issue:23
Large dimeric ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity in vitro and in vivo.
AID1753285Drug metabolism in human liver microsomes assessed as NADPH-independent covalent bond binding assessed per mg protein at 10 umol/L incubated for 1 hr in presence of NADPH by liquid scintillation counter analysis
AID1409295Transactivation of GAL4-fused human PPARgamma transfected in HEK293BENA cells after 24 hrs by steady glo-luciferase reporter gene assay
AID1572805Binding affinity to recombinant human N-terminal His6-tagged NAF1 expressed in Escherichia coli by scintillation proximity assay2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 04-01, Volume: 29, Issue:7
Binding of thiazolidinediones to the endoplasmic reticulum protein nutrient-deprivation autophagy factor-1.
AID601630Glucose consumption in differentiated mouse 3T3L1 cells in low-glucose medium after 24 hrs by glucose-oxidase method2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 19, Issue:10
Synthesis and biological evaluation of new flavonoid fatty acid esters with anti-adipogenic and enhancing glucose consumption activities.
AID1519401Inhibition of DPP4 in human serum assessed as decrease in p-nitroaniline formation using Gly-Pro-p-nitroanilide as substrate at 100 uM preincubated for 5 mins followed by incubation with substrate for 15 mins by microplate reader analysis relative to cont
AID106695Compound was evaluated for Antihyperglycemic activity in KKAy mice, glucose level for the treated group (T) over the anti-hyperglycaemic activity1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-20, Volume: 39, Issue:26
Synthesis and biological activity of metabolites of the antidiabetic, antihyperglycemic agent pioglitazone.
AID1166261Toxicity in streptozotocin induced diabetic Albino Wistar rat model assessed as induction of centrizonal triad inflammation measured 5 hrs post dose by haematoxylin and eosin staining based microscopy2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-24, Volume: 87Design, synthesis, in silico molecular docking and biological evaluation of novel oxadiazole based thiazolidine-2,4-diones bis-heterocycles as PPAR-γ agonists.
AID1546896Binding affinity to mouse MPC2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
The Race to Bash NASH: Emerging Targets and Drug Development in a Complex Liver Disease.
AID237960In vivo triglyceride level was observed in db/db mouse 4 weeks after oral administration (once daily) of 100 mg/kg of compound; (n=6)2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 15, Issue:3
Identification of putative metabolites of docosahexaenoic acid as potent PPARgamma agonists and antidiabetic agents.
AID678712Inhibition of human CYP1A2 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using ethoxyresorufin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1503557Induction of apoptosis in human SCC15 cells transfected with PPARgamma siRNA assessed as increase in caspase 3 activity at 50 uM after 24 hrs relative to control2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 141Anticancer properties of 4-thiazolidinone derivatives depend on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ).
AID1474130Ratio of drug concentration at steady state in human at 15 to 60 mg, po QD after 24 hrs to IC50 for human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cells2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1634120Antidiabetic activity in db/db mouse assessed as reduction in random blood glucose level at 30 mg/kg, po administered daily once for 2 weeks2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 29, Issue:16
Discovery of BR102375, a new class of non-TZD PPARγ full agonist for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
AID112794Area under blood glucose time curve after oral glucose test in mice2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-06, Volume: 46, Issue:23
Large dimeric ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity in vitro and in vivo.
AID141910Agonist activity for murine PPAR delta receptor in transcriptional activation assay; IA means inactive at 10 uM2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-24, Volume: 43, Issue:4
The PPARs: from orphan receptors to drug discovery.
AID372081AUC in db/db mouse at 75 mg/kg, po administered once daily for 11 days2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-09, Volume: 52, Issue:13
Discovery of (2R)-2-(3-{3-[(4-Methoxyphenyl)carbonyl]-2-methyl-6-(trifluoromethoxy)-1H-indol-1-yl}phenoxy)butanoic acid (MK-0533): a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma modulator for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus w
AID1535245Agonist activity at PPARgamma in mouse 3T3L1 cells assessed as increase in AP1 mRNA expression at 10 uM after 24 hrs by SYBR green dye based RT-PCR analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 02-15, Volume: 29, Issue:4
Identification of BR101549 as a lead candidate of non-TZD PPARγ agonist for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: Proof-of-concept evaluation and SAR.
AID1330908Transactivation at Gal4 fused PPARgamma LBD (unknown origin) expressed in African green monkey COS7 cells after 42 hrs by luciferase assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-29, Volume: 124New telmisartan-derived PPARγ agonists: Impact of the 3D-binding mode on the pharmacological profile.
AID473103Transactivation of human PPARgamma LBD expressed in african green monkey Cos7 cells co-transfected with fused GAL4-DBD after 14 hrs by Dual-Glo Luciferase reporter gene assay relative to pioglitazone2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 20, Issue:8
Rational design of a pirinixic acid derivative that acts as subtype-selective PPARgamma modulator.
AID109827Body weight of the non-fasted diabetic KK-Ay mice on day 0 was measured2003Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 13, Issue:24
Phenolics with PPAR-gamma ligand-binding activity obtained from licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis roots) and ameliorative effects of glycyrin on genetically diabetic KK-A(y) mice.
AID1662162Antidiabetic activity in Wistar rat assessed as reduction in glucose levels2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 03-01, Volume: 28, Issue:5
Anti-diabetic drugs recent approaches and advancements.
AID162627Binding affinity against Peroxisome Proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPAR alpha); Not active1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-06, Volume: 9, Issue:23
Synthesis and biological activity of a novel series of indole-derived PPARgamma agonists.
AID1830608Insulin-sensitizing activity in human HepG2 cells assessed as glucose consumption at 10 uM (Rvb= 2.04 +/- 0.12 mM)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-15, Volume: 52Synthesis and biological evaluation of cajanonic acid A derivatives as potential PPARγ antagonists.
AID1222793Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 41, Issue:5
Which metabolites circulate?
AID109804Blood glucose level of the diabetic KK-Ay mice on day 0 was measured2003Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 13, Issue:24
Phenolics with PPAR-gamma ligand-binding activity obtained from licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis roots) and ameliorative effects of glycyrin on genetically diabetic KK-A(y) mice.
AID1592999Antidiabetic activity in Wistar rat hemi-diaphragm at 2 mg assessed as increase in insulin-induced glucose uptake by GOD/POD enzymatic method2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 167Shooting three inflammatory targets with a single bullet: Novel multi-targeting anti-inflammatory glitazones.
AID1614508Displacement of FITC-NCoR1 peptide from human 6His-tagged PPARgamma isoform 1 LBD (203 to 477 residues) expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) after 1 hr by FITC/TR-FRET assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-28, Volume: 62, Issue:4
Structural Basis of Altered Potency and Efficacy Displayed by a Major in Vivo Metabolite of the Antidiabetic PPARγ Drug Pioglitazone.
AID1623713Inhibition of PTP1B in human HepG2 cells assessed as increase in insulin stimulated glucose uptake at 20 uM preincubated for 24 hrs followed by insulin addition and measured after 10 mins by 2-NBDG dye-based FACS analysis relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Investigation of stereoisomeric bisarylethenesulfonic acid esters for discovering potent and selective PTP1B inhibitors.
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID119523In vivo decrease in insulin in obese mice(ob/ob) at 10 mg/kg/day peroral administration for 2 weeks1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-22, Volume: 9, Issue:4
(3-substituted benzyl)thiazolidine-2,4-diones as structurally new antihyperglycemic agents.
AID1674184Toxicity in po dosed human assessed as maximum daily dose2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-22, Volume: 63, Issue:20
Drug Induced Liver Injury (DILI). Mechanisms and Medicinal Chemistry Avoidance/Mitigation Strategies.
AID109829Body weight of the non-fasted diabetic KK-Ay mice on day 7 was measured2003Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 13, Issue:24
Phenolics with PPAR-gamma ligand-binding activity obtained from licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis roots) and ameliorative effects of glycyrin on genetically diabetic KK-A(y) mice.
AID109828Body weight of the non-fasted diabetic KK-Ay mice on day 4 was measured2003Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 13, Issue:24
Phenolics with PPAR-gamma ligand-binding activity obtained from licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis roots) and ameliorative effects of glycyrin on genetically diabetic KK-A(y) mice.
AID705501Binding affinity to mouse membrane transport protein XK by chromatographic analysis relative to pioglitazone2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID156949In vitro transactivation of human Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-06, Volume: 46, Issue:23
Large dimeric ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity in vitro and in vivo.
AID590207Antidiabetic effect in db/db mouse assessed as reduction in plasma glucose level at 30 mg/kg/day, po administered daily for 14 days2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 21, Issue:7
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of novel benzoylazole-based PPAR α/γ activators.
AID1503564Induction of apoptosis in human SCC15 cells transfected with PPARbeta siRNA assessed as increase in caspase 3 activity at 50 uM after 24 hrs relative to control2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 141Anticancer properties of 4-thiazolidinone derivatives depend on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ).
AID1546883Agonist activity at PPARgamma (unknown origin)2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
The Race to Bash NASH: Emerging Targets and Drug Development in a Complex Liver Disease.
AID110560Average food intake of the diabetic KK-Ay mice was measured from total intake amount/days/number of mice2003Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 13, Issue:24
Phenolics with PPAR-gamma ligand-binding activity obtained from licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis roots) and ameliorative effects of glycyrin on genetically diabetic KK-A(y) mice.
AID705748Binding affinity to mouse mitochondrial dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase by chromatographic analysis relative to rosiglitazone2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1519408Metal chelating activity assessed as inhibition of Cu2+ ion-induced oxidation of ascorbic acid compound treated with CuSO4.5H2O for 5 mins followed by ascorbate addition and measured immediately by spectrophotometric analysis
AID499444Induction of adipocyte differentiation in mouse ST-13 cells at 10 uM2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 18, Issue:16
Characterization of new PPARgamma agonists: benzimidazole derivatives-importance of positions 5 and 6, and computational studies on the binding mode.
AID1636356Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2C9-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 300 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of NA2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID662861Competitive inhibition of human MAOB expressed in Pichia pastoris2011ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-15, Volume: 3, Issue:1
Molecular Insights into Human Monoamine Oxidase B Inhibition by the Glitazone Anti-Diabetes Drugs.
AID705478Binding affinity to mouse tyrosine-protein kinase transmembrane receptor ROR1 by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID605740Antidiabetic activity in ZDF rat assessed as body weight gain at 3 mg/kg, po QD for 40 days (Rvb = 133+/-9 g)2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-23, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Discovery of a series of imidazo[4,5-b]pyridines with dual activity at angiotensin II type 1 receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ.
AID1634123Toxicity in db/db mouse assessed as reduction in food intake at 30 mg/kg, po administered daily once and measured on day 72019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 29, Issue:16
Discovery of BR102375, a new class of non-TZD PPARγ full agonist for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
AID705756Binding affinity to L-lactate dehydrogenase B chain in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis relative to rosiglitazone2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID705490Binding affinity to mouse trace amine-associated receptor 7b by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID243335Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in reporter gene assay: most active2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 15, Issue:6
Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel PPARgamma ligands based on rosiglitazone and 15d-PGJ2.
AID156232In vitro transcriptional activation of peroxisome proliferator activated alpha-receptor (PPAR) expressed in CV-1 cells; Inactive1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-02, Volume: 39, Issue:3
The structure-activity relationship between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonism and the antihyperglycemic activity of thiazolidinediones.
AID1383696Hypoglycemic activity in db/db mouse assessed as decrease in blood glucose level at 30 mg/kg, po treated for 3 week measured at 3 hrs post last dose (Rvb = 0.0 +/- 6.8%)2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Discovery of tetrahydrocarbazoles with potent hypoglycemic and hypolipemic activities.
AID1466738Transactivation activity at Gal4 fused full length human PPARgamma LBD expressed in HEK293 cells after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay relative to pioglitazone2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-15, Volume: 27, Issue:12
Structure-activity relationships of rosiglitazone for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma transrepression.
AID1192622Inhibition of human recombinant soluble MAO-B expressed in Pichia pastoris incubated for 30 mins prior to substrate addition measured after 60 mins by MAO-Glo assay2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 23, Issue:4
Reversible and irreversible small molecule inhibitors of monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) investigated by biophysical techniques.
AID1166257Hepatoprotective effect in streptozotocin induced diabetic Albino Wistar rat model assessed as reduction in serum ALP level2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-24, Volume: 87Design, synthesis, in silico molecular docking and biological evaluation of novel oxadiazole based thiazolidine-2,4-diones bis-heterocycles as PPAR-γ agonists.
AID680215TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of estrone-3-sulfate uptake (Estrone-3-sulfate: 9.2 nM) by Pioglitazone at a concentration of 10uM in OATP8-expressing Xenopus oocytes2004Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 32, Issue:3
Involvement of organic anion transporting polypeptides in the transport of troglitazone sulfate: implications for understanding troglitazone hepatotoxicity.
AID590209Antidiabetic effect in db/db mouse assessed as increase in HDL cholesterol level at 30 mg/kg/day, po administered daily for 14 days2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 21, Issue:7
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of novel benzoylazole-based PPAR α/γ activators.
AID1193229Hypoglycemic effect in eight week old female db/db mouse assessed as reduction in fasting triglyceride level at 30 mg/kg, intragastric for 3 weeks2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of GY3-based derivatives for anti-type 2 diabetes activity.
AID499443Activation of Gal4-tagged human PPARgamma expressed in CHO cells by luciferase reporter gene assay relative to pioglitazone2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 18, Issue:16
Characterization of new PPARgamma agonists: benzimidazole derivatives-importance of positions 5 and 6, and computational studies on the binding mode.
AID1506476Antihyperglycemic activity in db/db mouse assessed as increase in HDL-C level at 10 mg/kg, po qd for 15 days
AID115625Minimum effective dose required for significant reduction in blood glucose in ob/ob mice1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-02, Volume: 39, Issue:3
The structure-activity relationship between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonism and the antihyperglycemic activity of thiazolidinediones.
AID1757129Induction of cell sensitization to imatinib in imatinib-resistant human K562 cells assessed as cell death at >10 uM incubated for 72 hrs in presence of 1 uM imatinib by PI staining based flow cytometry2021European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 216Tackling resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia: Novel cell death modulators with improved efficacy.
AID501302Inhibition of human recombinant MAO-B after 15 mins2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-01, Volume: 20, Issue:17
Identification of novel monoamine oxidase B inhibitors by structure-based virtual screening.
AID607109Antidiabetic activity in ZDF rat assessed as blood glucose level at 3 mg/kg, po QD for 40 days (Rvb = 771+/-60 mg/dL)2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-23, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Discovery of a series of imidazo[4,5-b]pyridines with dual activity at angiotensin II type 1 receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ.
AID1333357Transactivation of GAL4-fused human PPARgamma ligand binding domain expressed in African green monkey COS7 cells at 10 uM after 42 hrs by dual luciferase reporter gene assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-29, Volume: 124Evaluation of selected 3D virtual screening tools for the prospective identification of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ partial agonists.
AID1650496Induction of adipogenesis in human MSC incubated for 5 days cotreated with IDX by ELISA2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 28, Issue:1
Selenium bioisosteric replacement of adenosine derivatives promoting adiponectin secretion increases the binding affinity to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ.
AID1419243Antidiabetic activity in KKAy mouse model assessed as blood glucose level at 100 mg/kg/day, po administered for 4 days2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 12-01, Volume: 26, Issue:22
PPARγ-sparing thiazolidinediones as insulin sensitizers. Design, synthesis and selection of compounds for clinical development.
AID421097AUC in C57BLKS/J-m+/+Leprdb db/db mouse at 10 mg/kg, po once daily for 11 days2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-23, Volume: 52, Issue:14
Discovery of a peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) modulator with balanced PPARalpha activity for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia.
AID705734Binding affinity to trace amine-associated receptor 7b in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID730271Toxicity against KKAy mouse assessed as plasma gammaGTP level at 10 mg/kg/day, po for 14 days (Rvb = 5.8 +/- 0.6 IU)2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-14, Volume: 56, Issue:5
Mechanism of retinoid X receptor partial agonistic action of 1-(3,5,5,8,8-pentamethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-naphthyl)-1H-benzotriazole-5-carboxylic acid and structural development to increase potency.
AID699541Inhibition of human liver OATP2B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E3S uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID1535248Agonist activity at PPARgamma in mouse 3T3L1 cells assessed as increase in adiponectin mRNA expression at 10 uM after 24 hrs by SYBR green dye based RT-PCR analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 02-15, Volume: 29, Issue:4
Identification of BR101549 as a lead candidate of non-TZD PPARγ agonist for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: Proof-of-concept evaluation and SAR.
AID1330914Growth inhibition of human LNCAP cells expressing PPARgamma at 50 uM after 72 hrs by crystal violet staining based assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-29, Volume: 124New telmisartan-derived PPARγ agonists: Impact of the 3D-binding mode on the pharmacological profile.
AID761963Antiinflammatory activity against PMA-stimulated human THP1 cells assessed as IL-1beta levels after 48 hrs by ELISA (Rvb = 172 +/- 0.71 pg/ml)2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 66Novel 2-(2,4-dioxo-1,3-thiazolidin-5-yl)acetamides as antioxidant and/or anti-inflammatory compounds.
AID156775Binding affinity against Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor delta (PPAR delta); Not active1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-06, Volume: 9, Issue:23
Synthesis and biological activity of a novel series of indole-derived PPARgamma agonists.
AID705742Binding affinity to mouse norrin precursor by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1677034Antiproliferative activity against human K562 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 12-01, Volume: 30, Issue:23
Benzylidene thiazolidinediones: Synthesis, in vitro investigations of antiproliferative mechanisms and in vivo efficacy determination in combination with Imatinib.
AID408484Displacement of [3H]rosigliatzone from PPARgamma in rat adipocytes2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-01, Volume: 18, Issue:11
New PPARgamma ligands based on 2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone: computer-aided design, synthesis, and receptor-binding studies.
AID1535247Agonist activity at PPARgamma in mouse 3T3L1 cells assessed as increase in Glut4 mRNA expression at 10 uM after 24 hrs by SYBR green dye based RT-PCR analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 02-15, Volume: 29, Issue:4
Identification of BR101549 as a lead candidate of non-TZD PPARγ agonist for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: Proof-of-concept evaluation and SAR.
AID678716Inhibition of human CYP3A4 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using diethoxyfluorescein as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1506456Antihyperglycemic activity in db/db mouse assessed as reduction in blood glucose level at 10 mg/kg, po qd and measured on day 4 by oral glucose tolerance test
AID718853Transactivation of human GAL4-fused PPARalpha ligand binding domain transfected in HEK293 cells after 18 hrs by dual luciferase reporter gene assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 22, Issue:24
Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of fibrate-based analogues inside PPARs.
AID1409611AUC (cytotoxicity %) of compound against Vero E6 cells by MTT assay.2020Nature, 07, Volume: 583, Issue:7816
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.
AID110711Average sample intake of the diabetic KK-Ay mice was measured as average food intake/average body weight of mice2003Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 13, Issue:24
Phenolics with PPAR-gamma ligand-binding activity obtained from licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis roots) and ameliorative effects of glycyrin on genetically diabetic KK-A(y) mice.
AID1276056Transactivation of human PPARgamma expressed in African green monkey COS7 cells incubated overnight by dual-glo luciferase reporter gene assay2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 59, Issue:1
N-Benzylbenzamides: A Novel Merged Scaffold for Orally Available Dual Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase/Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Modulators.
AID1614505Displacement of fluormone PanPPAR green tracer ligand from human 6His-tagged PPARgamma isoform 1 LBD (203 to 477 residues) expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) after 1 hr by TR-FRET assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-28, Volume: 62, Issue:4
Structural Basis of Altered Potency and Efficacy Displayed by a Major in Vivo Metabolite of the Antidiabetic PPARγ Drug Pioglitazone.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID705495Binding affinity to mitochondrial ATP synthase beta chain in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID709645Transactivation of GAL4-fused human PPARalpha ligand binding domain transfected in african green monkey COS7 cells by luciferase reporter gene assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of dual modulators of soluble epoxide hydrolase and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors.
AID1546897Activation of mouse liver PPARalpha2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
The Race to Bash NASH: Emerging Targets and Drug Development in a Complex Liver Disease.
AID548198Partial agonist activity at human PPARgamma-LBD expressed in HEK293T cells assessed as induction of receptor transactivation at 10 uM after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
1,3-Diphenyl-1H-pyrazole derivatives as a new series of potent PPARγ partial agonists.
AID680565TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of estrone-3-sulfate uptake (Estrone-3-sulfate: 9.2 nM) by Pioglitazone at a concentration of 10uM in OATP-C-expressing Xenopus oocytes2004Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 32, Issue:3
Involvement of organic anion transporting polypeptides in the transport of troglitazone sulfate: implications for understanding troglitazone hepatotoxicity.
AID1519407Anti-glycation activity assessed as inhibition of AGE formation by measuring decrease in glycated BSA protein level incubated for 24 hrs in presence of glucose by fluorescence based assay
AID157283In vitro transcriptional activation of Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPAR) expressed in CV-1 cells1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-02, Volume: 39, Issue:3
The structure-activity relationship between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonism and the antihyperglycemic activity of thiazolidinediones.
AID473106Transactivation of human PPARalpha LBD expressed in african green monkey Cos7 cells co-transfected with fused GAL4-DBD at 10 uM after 14 hrs by Dual-Glo Luciferase reporter gene assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 20, Issue:8
Rational design of a pirinixic acid derivative that acts as subtype-selective PPARgamma modulator.
AID744057Induction of apoptosis in human OCUM-2MD3 cells after 72 hrs by Hoechst 33342/propidium iodide staining-based fluorescence microscopy2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 21, Issue:8
Design and synthesis of a series of α-benzyl phenylpropanoic acid-type peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma partial agonists with improved aqueous solubility.
AID705492Binding affinity to mouse chloride channel protein 6 after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID291758Displacement of [3H]rosiglitazone from PPAR gamma2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-15, Volume: 17, Issue:16
Design and synthesis of 6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-pyrimidine-5-carboxylic acid derivatives as PPARgamma activators.
AID1473998AUC in human at 15 to 60 mg, po QD after 24 hrs2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID3419Insulin-sensitizing activity; triglyceride accumulation from insulin regulated differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells at 1 uM expressed as percent activity of pioglitazone2000Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-06, Volume: 10, Issue:21
Hybridization of non-sulfonylurea insulin secretagogue and thiazolidinedione-derived insulin sensitizer.
AID1816962Cytotoxicity against human HeLa cells assessed as cell death incubated at 10 uM for 20 hrs measured by DNS assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-27, Volume: 64, Issue:10
Thiazolidinedione "Magic Bullets" Simultaneously Targeting PPARγ and HDACs: Design, Synthesis, and Investigations of their
AID156615In vitro transactivation of human Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor delta (hPPARdelta); Not calculated for transactivation <25% at 30 uM2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-06, Volume: 46, Issue:23
Large dimeric ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity in vitro and in vivo.
AID1315302Antidiabetic activity in overnight fasted leptin receptor deficient db/db C57BL/KSJ mouse assessed as reduction in postprandial blood glucose AUC at 10 mg/kg, po administered on day 10 post glucose challenge measured up to 120 mins by oral glucose toleran2016Journal of natural products, 05-27, Volume: 79, Issue:5
Naturally Occurring Carbazole Alkaloids from Murraya koenigii as Potential Antidiabetic Agents.
AID665293Hypolipidemic activity in alloxan-induced diabetic Wistar rat model assessed as reduction in triglyceride level at 30 mg/kg, po for 15 days measured on day 152012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 53Synthesis, hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic activities of novel thiazolidinedione derivatives containing thiazole/triazole/oxadiazole ring.
AID1224233Hepatotoxicity in streptozotocin-induced in Albino Wistar rat diabetic model assessed as fatty changes in hepatocyte by Haematoxylin/Eosin staining-based microscopy2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 24, Issue:14
Thiazolidine-2,4-diones derivatives as PPAR-γ agonists: synthesis, molecular docking, in vitro and in vivo antidiabetic activity with hepatotoxicity risk evaluation and effect on PPAR-γ gene expression.
AID25996Area under blood glucose time curve after OGTT on the 9th day of treatment2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID601555Glucose consumption in differentiated mouse 3T3L1 cells in low-glucose medium at 50 ug/ml after 24 hrs by glucose-oxidase method (Rvb =2.41 +/- 0.22 mmol/L)2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 19, Issue:10
Synthesis and biological evaluation of new flavonoid fatty acid esters with anti-adipogenic and enhancing glucose consumption activities.
AID705507Binding affinity to mouse neurofibromin by chromatographic analysis relative to pioglitazone2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID550072Antidiabetic activity in db/db mouse assessed as reduction of blood glucose level at 41 mg/kg administered with chow diet ad for 14 days2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-01, Volume: 21, Issue:1
Development of a new class of benzoylpyrrole-based PPARα/γ activators.
AID1335109Antidiabetic activity in diet-induced obese mouse assessed as increase in glucose infusion rate during hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp procedure at 10 mg/kg, po qd administered daily via gavage measured after 28 days2017ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-12, Volume: 8, Issue:1
Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Novel and Selective G-protein Coupled Receptor 120 (GPR120) Spirocyclic Agonists.
AID1383695Hypoglycemic activity in db/db mouse assessed as decrease in blood glucose level at 30 mg/kg, po treated for 2 week measured at 3 hrs post last dose (Rvb = 0.0 +/- 4.0%)2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Discovery of tetrahydrocarbazoles with potent hypoglycemic and hypolipemic activities.
AID1503553Cytotoxicity against human SCC15 cells transfected with PPARalpha siRNA assessed as reduction in cell viability at 50 uM after 24 hrs by resazurin reduction assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 141Anticancer properties of 4-thiazolidinone derivatives depend on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ).
AID1572807Binding affinity to NAF1 in human HepG2 cells assessed as inhibition of mitochondrial respiration at 30 uM2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 04-01, Volume: 29, Issue:7
Binding of thiazolidinediones to the endoplasmic reticulum protein nutrient-deprivation autophagy factor-1.
AID1741908Inhibition of PTP1B in human HepG2 cells assessed as improvement in insulin-induced 2-NBDG uptake at 20 uM incubated for 24 hrs prior to compound washout followed by insulin stimulation for 20 mins and subsequent 2-NBDG addition measured after 60 mins by 2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 205Synthesis and biological evaluation of geniposide derivatives as potent and selective PTPlB inhibitors.
AID1753283Drug metabolism in human liver microsomes assessed as total covalent bond binding assessed per mg protein at 10 umol/L incubated for 1 hr in presence of NADPH by liquid scintillation counter analysis
AID1673239Binding affinity to PPARdelta (unknown origin) by TR-FRET assay2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-01, Volume: 27, Issue:13
2-Phenyl-8-(1-phenylallyl)-chromenone compounds have a pan-PPAR modulator pharmacophore.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1830609Insulin-sensitizing activity in human HepG2 cells assessed as increase in glucose consumption at 10 uM relative to control2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-15, Volume: 52Synthesis and biological evaluation of cajanonic acid A derivatives as potential PPARγ antagonists.
AID705754Binding affinity to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1634121Antidiabetic activity in db/db mouse assessed as reduction in body weight gain at 30 mg/kg, po administered daily once for 2 weeks2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 29, Issue:16
Discovery of BR102375, a new class of non-TZD PPARγ full agonist for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
AID1315303Antidiabetic activity in overnight fasted leptin receptor deficient db/db C57BL/KSJ mouse assessed as reduction in postprandial blood glucose AUC at 10 mg/kg, po administered on day 15 post glucose challenge measured up to 120 mins by oral glucose toleran2016Journal of natural products, 05-27, Volume: 79, Issue:5
Naturally Occurring Carbazole Alkaloids from Murraya koenigii as Potential Antidiabetic Agents.
AID1673221Induction of adipogenesis in human BMMSC cells assessed as increase in ANGPTL4 mRNA at 1 uM incubated for 3 days by qRT-PCR analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-01, Volume: 27, Issue:13
2-Phenyl-8-(1-phenylallyl)-chromenone compounds have a pan-PPAR modulator pharmacophore.
AID1428291Agonist activity at GST-tagged human recombinant PPARgamma-LBD assessed as fluorescein-labeled coactivator TRAP220 recruitment by lanthascreen TR-FRET assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 126Importance of 5/6-aryl substitution on the pharmacological profile of 4'-((2-propyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)methyl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-2-carboxylic acid derived PPARγ agonists.
AID348420Displacement of [3H]rosiglitazone from mouse PPARgamma receptor by scintillation proximation assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-15, Volume: 18, Issue:18
New PPARgamma ligands based on barbituric acid: virtual screening, synthesis and receptor binding studies.
AID1753284Drug metabolism in human liver microsomes assessed as total covalent bond binding assessed per mg protein at 50 umol/L incubated for 1 hr in presence of NADPH by liquid scintillation counter analysis
AID590210Toxicity in db/db mouse assessed as body weight gain at 30 mg/kg/day, po administered daily for 14 days relative to control2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 21, Issue:7
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of novel benzoylazole-based PPAR α/γ activators.
AID705737Binding affinity to Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID476883Agonist activity at PPARgamma assessed as transcriptional activation relative to GI2625702010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 20, Issue:7
Discovery of a novel selective PPARgamma modulator from (-)-Cercosporamide derivatives.
AID1330915Growth inhibition of African green monkey COS7 cells at 50 uM after 72 hrs by crystal violet staining based assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-29, Volume: 124New telmisartan-derived PPARγ agonists: Impact of the 3D-binding mode on the pharmacological profile.
AID607039Partial agonist activity at human PPARgamma-LBD/Gal4 DNA binding domain by transactivation assay relative to darglitazone2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-23, Volume: 54, Issue:12
Discovery of a series of imidazo[4,5-b]pyridines with dual activity at angiotensin II type 1 receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ.
AID237601In vivo body weight gain was observed in db/db mouse 4 weeks after oral administration (once daily) of 100 mg/kg of compound; (n=6)2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 15, Issue:3
Identification of putative metabolites of docosahexaenoic acid as potent PPARgamma agonists and antidiabetic agents.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID728044Partial agonist activity at human PPARgamma-LBD/Gal4 DNA binding domain by transactivation assay relative to darglitazone2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 23, Issue:3
Design, synthesis, and evaluation of imidazo[4,5-c]pyridin-4-one derivatives with dual activity at angiotensin II type 1 receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ.
AID1333356Displacement of Fluoromone from GST-tagged recombinant human PPARgamma ligand binding domain by LanthaScreen TR-FRET assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-29, Volume: 124Evaluation of selected 3D virtual screening tools for the prospective identification of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ partial agonists.
AID1701613Displacement of [125I]I-AB-MECA from recombinant human A3AR expressed in CHO cell membranes measured after 60 mins by gamma counter analysis
AID1288256Transactivation of PPARgamma (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293A cells at 150 uM after 16 to 18 hrs by luciferase reporter assay relative to control2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, May-23, Volume: 114Synthesis, in vitro evaluation, and molecular modeling investigation of benzenesulfonimide peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors α antagonists.
AID1506463Antihyperglycemic activity in db/db mouse assessed as improvement on glucose tolerance by measuring blood glucose AUC level at 10 mg/kg, po qd for 15 days by oral glucose tolerance test
AID699540Inhibition of human liver OATP1B3 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID1474000Ratio of drug concentration at steady state in human at 15 to 60 mg, po QD after 24 hrs to IC50 for human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 insect cells2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1192621Inhibition of human recombinant microsomal MAO-B expressed in Pichia pastoris incubated for 30 mins prior to substrate addition measured after 60 mins by MAO-Glo assay2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 23, Issue:4
Reversible and irreversible small molecule inhibitors of monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) investigated by biophysical techniques.
AID665291Hypolipidemic activity in alloxan-induced diabetic Wistar rat model assessed as reduction in triglyceride level at 3 mg/kg, po for 15 days measured on day 152012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 53Synthesis, hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic activities of novel thiazolidinedione derivatives containing thiazole/triazole/oxadiazole ring.
AID1449628Inhibition of human BSEP expressed in baculovirus transfected fall armyworm Sf21 cell membranes vesicles assessed as reduction in ATP-dependent [3H]-taurocholate transport into vesicles incubated for 5 mins by Topcount based rapid filtration method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Dec, Volume: 40, Issue:12
Mitigating the inhibition of human bile salt export pump by drugs: opportunities provided by physicochemical property modulation, in silico modeling, and structural modification.
AID1217705Time dependent inhibition of CYP2B6 (unknown origin) at 100 uM by LC/MS system2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID705489Binding affinity to mouse voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel alpha-1F subunit by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1753286Drug metabolism in human liver microsomes assessed as NADPH-independent covalent bond binding assessed per mg protein at 50 umol/L incubated for 1 hr in presence of NADPH by liquid scintillation counter analysis
AID82573Insulin-releasing activity in HIT-T15 cells in the presence of 16.7 mM glucose at 10 uM expressed as percent activity of nateglinide2000Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-06, Volume: 10, Issue:21
Hybridization of non-sulfonylurea insulin secretagogue and thiazolidinedione-derived insulin sensitizer.
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID1918900Binding affinity to PPARgamma (unknown origin) assessed as inhibition constant by Cheng-Prusoff equation analysis2022Journal of natural products, 12-23, Volume: 85, Issue:12
Discovery of Pan-peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Modulators from an Endolichenic Fungus,
AID705512Binding affinity to creatine kinase B-type in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID119529In vivo decrease in triglyceride in obese mice(ob/ob) by 3 mg/kg/day peroral administration for 2 weeks1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-22, Volume: 9, Issue:4
(3-substituted benzyl)thiazolidine-2,4-diones as structurally new antihyperglycemic agents.
AID1506479Antihyperglycemic activity in db/db mouse assessed as reduction in fasting blood glucose level at 10 mg/kg, po qd for 15 days
AID709649Transactivation of GAL4-fused human PPARalpha ligand binding domain transfected in african green monkey COS7 cells at 10 uM by luciferase reporter gene assay relative to GW76472012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of dual modulators of soluble epoxide hydrolase and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors.
AID678715Inhibition of human CYP2D6 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 4-methylaminoethyl-7-methoxycoumarin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1209455Inhibition of human BSEP expressed in plasma membrane vesicles of Sf21 cells assessed as inhibition of ATP-dependent [3H]taurocholate uptake2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 40, Issue:1
In vitro inhibition of the bile salt export pump correlates with risk of cholestatic drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID709647Transactivation of GAL4-fused human PPARdelta ligand binding domain transfected in african green monkey COS7 cells at 10 uM by luciferase reporter gene assay relative to L-1650412012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of dual modulators of soluble epoxide hydrolase and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors.
AID601556Glucose consumption in differentiated mouse 3T3L1 cells in low-glucose medium at 100 ug/ml after 24 hrs by glucose-oxidase method (Rvb =2.35 +/- 0.19 mmol/L)2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 19, Issue:10
Synthesis and biological evaluation of new flavonoid fatty acid esters with anti-adipogenic and enhancing glucose consumption activities.
AID156149In vitro transactivation of human Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (hPPARalpha)2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-06, Volume: 46, Issue:23
Large dimeric ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity in vitro and in vivo.
AID30160Volume of distribution during steady state2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID662858Inhibition of rat MAOA expressed in Pichia pastoris at 100 uM2011ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-15, Volume: 3, Issue:1
Molecular Insights into Human Monoamine Oxidase B Inhibition by the Glitazone Anti-Diabetes Drugs.
AID1593004Inhibition of PMA-induced human THP1 monocytes differentiation in to macrophages assessed as macrophage metabolic activity preincubated for 6 hrs before PMA stimulation2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 167Shooting three inflammatory targets with a single bullet: Novel multi-targeting anti-inflammatory glitazones.
AID113349In vivo nonfasting blood glucose in db/db mice after oral treatment2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-06, Volume: 46, Issue:23
Large dimeric ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity in vitro and in vivo.
AID728045Partial agonist activity at human PPARgamma-LBD/Gal4 DNA binding domain by transactivation assay2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 23, Issue:3
Design, synthesis, and evaluation of imidazo[4,5-c]pyridin-4-one derivatives with dual activity at angiotensin II type 1 receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ.
AID761964Antiinflammatory activity against PMA-stimulated human THP1 cells assessed as MCP-1 levels after 48 hrs by ELISA (Rvb = 3521.63 +/- 79.78 pg/ml)2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 66Novel 2-(2,4-dioxo-1,3-thiazolidin-5-yl)acetamides as antioxidant and/or anti-inflammatory compounds.
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID588210Human drug-induced liver injury (DILI) modelling dataset from Ekins et al2010Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Dec, Volume: 38, Issue:12
A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.
AID1503554Cytotoxicity against human SCC15 cells transfected with PPARbeta siRNA assessed as reduction in cell viability at 50 uM after 24 hrs by resazurin reduction assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 141Anticancer properties of 4-thiazolidinone derivatives depend on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ).
AID141913Agonist activity for murine PPAR gamma receptor in transcriptional activation assay2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-24, Volume: 43, Issue:4
The PPARs: from orphan receptors to drug discovery.
AID1633590Ex vivo antiinflammatory activity in Sprague-Dawley rat cortex assessed as inhibition of LPS-induced PGE2 production at 1 uM incubated for 4 hrs followed by LPS addition by radioimmunoassay2019ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-11, Volume: 10, Issue:4
Novel Phenyldiazenyl Fibrate Analogues as PPAR α/γ/δ Pan-Agonists for the Amelioration of Metabolic Syndrome.
AID237958In vivo triglyceride level was observed in ZDF rats 4 weeks after oral administration (once daily) of 30 mg/kg of compound; (n=6)2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 15, Issue:3
Identification of putative metabolites of docosahexaenoic acid as potent PPARgamma agonists and antidiabetic agents.
AID1668534Agonist activity at recombinant human pFA-CMV fused PPARgamma expressed in HEK293T cells transfected with pFR-luciferase plasmid and pRL-SV40 plasmid incubated for 14 to 16 hrs by dual glo luciferase reporter gene assay2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-09, Volume: 63, Issue:13
l-Thyroxin and the Nonclassical Thyroid Hormone TETRAC Are Potent Activators of PPARγ.
AID1593000Antidiabetic activity in Wistar rat hemi-diaphragm at 2 mg assessed as increase in glucose uptake in absence of insulin by GOD/POD enzymatic method2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 167Shooting three inflammatory targets with a single bullet: Novel multi-targeting anti-inflammatory glitazones.
AID705494Binding affinity to mitochondrial ATP synthase alpha chain in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1424215Induction of apoptosis in human HT1080 cells assessed as induction of DNA fragmentation at 50 uM incubated for 48 hrs by flow cytometry2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-16, Volume: 133Novel 2,4- thiazolidinediones: Synthesis, in vitro cytotoxic activity, and mechanistic investigation.
AID157264Transcriptional activation of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-06, Volume: 9, Issue:23
Synthesis and biological activity of a novel series of indole-derived PPARgamma agonists.
AID709650Inhibition of recombinant soluble epoxide hydrolase using PHOME as substrate after 10 mins by fluorescence assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of dual modulators of soluble epoxide hydrolase and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors.
AID1535246Agonist activity at PPARgamma in mouse 3T3L1 cells assessed as increase in CD36 mRNA expression at 10 uM after 24 hrs by SYBR green dye based RT-PCR analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 02-15, Volume: 29, Issue:4
Identification of BR101549 as a lead candidate of non-TZD PPARγ agonist for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: Proof-of-concept evaluation and SAR.
AID136640Percent reduction in area under glucose tolerance curve at 300 uM/kg dose in diet of mice.1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-11, Volume: 37, Issue:23
[[omega-(Heterocyclylamino)alkoxy]benzyl]-2,4-thiazolidinediones as potent antihyperglycemic agents.
AID730270Toxicity against KKAy mouse assessed as plasma ALP level at 10 mg/kg/day, po for 14 days (Rvb = 358.2 +/- 43.1 IU)2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-14, Volume: 56, Issue:5
Mechanism of retinoid X receptor partial agonistic action of 1-(3,5,5,8,8-pentamethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-naphthyl)-1H-benzotriazole-5-carboxylic acid and structural development to increase potency.
AID1356770Neurotoxicity in rat primary cerebellar granule neurons assessed as reduction in cell viability at 5 uM incubated for 24 hrs by MTT assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-13, Volume: 61, Issue:17
Tau-Centric Multitarget Approach for Alzheimer's Disease: Development of First-in-Class Dual Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β and Tau-Aggregation Inhibitors.
AID1330913Full agonist activity at PPARgamma in mouse 3T3L1 preadipocytes assessed as increase in insulin induced adipocyte differentiation by measuring triglyceride accumulation at 1 to 10 uM after 9 days by Oil-Red O staining based assay relative to control2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-29, Volume: 124New telmisartan-derived PPARγ agonists: Impact of the 3D-binding mode on the pharmacological profile.
AID115315In vivo nonfasting blood glucose in db/db mice after oral treatment2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-06, Volume: 46, Issue:23
Large dimeric ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity in vitro and in vivo.
AID156460In vitro transactivation of rat Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-06, Volume: 46, Issue:23
Large dimeric ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity in vitro and in vivo.
AID1578131Induction of sensitization to imatinib-induced cytotoxicity in imatinib-resistant human K562-IMA[r] cells assessed as induction of cell death at 10 uM after 72 hrs in presence of 1 uM imatinib by propidium iodide/Triton-X100 dye based FACS analysis2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 185Overcoming imatinib resistance in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells using non-cytotoxic cell death modulators.
AID662851Inhibition of human histone demethylase LSD1 up to 100 uM2011ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-15, Volume: 3, Issue:1
Molecular Insights into Human Monoamine Oxidase B Inhibition by the Glitazone Anti-Diabetes Drugs.
AID223546Fold activation relative to maximum activation obtained with carbacyclin2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID1608418Inhibition of PPARgamma (unknown origin) at 10 uM after 24 hrs relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-15, Volume: 180Role of sulphur-heterocycles in medicinal chemistry: An update.
AID1217706Time dependent inhibition of CYP2C9 (unknown origin) at 100 uM by LC/MS system2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID1424224Increase in p21(WAF1) protein expression in human PC3 cells at 50 uM incubated for 24 hrs by Western blot analysis2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-16, Volume: 133Novel 2,4- thiazolidinediones: Synthesis, in vitro cytotoxic activity, and mechanistic investigation.
AID157268Binding affinity against Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma)1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-06, Volume: 9, Issue:23
Synthesis and biological activity of a novel series of indole-derived PPARgamma agonists.
AID705758Binding affinity to mitochondrial long-chain specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis relative to rosiglitazone2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID705503Binding affinity to RasGTPase-activating protein SynGAP in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis relative to pioglitazone2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1217714Time dependent inhibition of CYP2C8 (unknown origin) at 30 uM by LC/MS system2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID550074Toxicity in db/db mouse assessed as increase of body weight at 41 mg/kg administered with chow diet ad for 14 days2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-01, Volume: 21, Issue:1
Development of a new class of benzoylpyrrole-based PPARα/γ activators.
AID1677036Antiproliferative activity against human KB cells assessed as cell growth inhibition2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 12-01, Volume: 30, Issue:23
Benzylidene thiazolidinediones: Synthesis, in vitro investigations of antiproliferative mechanisms and in vivo efficacy determination in combination with Imatinib.
AID223543Fold activation relative to maximum hPPAR alpha activation obtained with WY-146432002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID1420542Antidiabetic activity in db/db mouse model assessed as suppression of blood glucose increase at 20 mg/kg qd, po administered for 13 days2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 10-15, Volume: 28, Issue:19
Discovery of the bifunctional modulator of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) and PPARγ derived from the AT1R antagonist, Fimasartan.
AID1217709Time dependent inhibition of CYP3A4 (unknown origin) at 100 uM by LC/MS system2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID1535280Toxicity in db/db mouse assessed as body weight at 20 mg/kg, po administered once daily for 13 days (Rvb = 33.5 g)2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 02-15, Volume: 29, Issue:4
Identification of BR101549 as a lead candidate of non-TZD PPARγ agonist for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: Proof-of-concept evaluation and SAR.
AID705735Binding affinity to mouse interleukin-12 beta chain precursor by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID109824Body weight of the fasted diabetic KK-Ay mice on day 10 was measured2003Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 13, Issue:24
Phenolics with PPAR-gamma ligand-binding activity obtained from licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis roots) and ameliorative effects of glycyrin on genetically diabetic KK-A(y) mice.
AID1424216Cytotoxic activity in human PC3 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 3 days by MTT assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-16, Volume: 133Novel 2,4- thiazolidinediones: Synthesis, in vitro cytotoxic activity, and mechanistic investigation.
AID705479Binding affinity to 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1 in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID744056Induction of apoptosis in human OUMS-24 cells after 72 hrs by Hoechst 33342/propidium iodide staining-based fluorescence microscopy2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 21, Issue:8
Design and synthesis of a series of α-benzyl phenylpropanoic acid-type peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma partial agonists with improved aqueous solubility.
AID730365Antidiabetic activity in diet-induced obesity mouse assessed as reduction in fasting glucose level at 30 mg/kg, po2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 23, Issue:6
Discovery of novel 7-membered cyclic amide derivatives that inhibit 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1.
AID1192631Binding affinity to human recombinant microsomal MAO-B by ITC2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 23, Issue:4
Reversible and irreversible small molecule inhibitors of monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) investigated by biophysical techniques.
AID1519406Anti-glycation activity assessed as inhibition of AGE formation by measuring decrease in glycated BSA protein level at 100 uM incubated for 24 hrs in presence of glucose by fluorescence based assay relative to control
AID1276053Inhibition of human recombinant sEH using PHOME as substrate preincubated for 30 mins followed by substrate addition measured for 30 mins by fluorescence-based assay2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 59, Issue:1
N-Benzylbenzamides: A Novel Merged Scaffold for Orally Available Dual Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase/Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Modulators.
AID1443989Inhibition of recombinant human BSEP expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cell plasma membrane vesicles assessed as reduction in ATP-dependent [3H]-taurocholate uptake in to vesicles preincubated for 10 mins followed by ATP addition measured after 10 to 2014Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), Sep, Volume: 60, Issue:3
Human drug-induced liver injury severity is highly associated with dual inhibition of liver mitochondrial function and bile salt export pump.
AID223549Fold activation relative to maximum activation obtained with rosiglitazone2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Novel tricyclic-alpha-alkyloxyphenylpropionic acids: dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists with hypolipidemic and antidiabetic activity.
AID705491Binding affinity to sodium-dependent multivitamin transporter in Sprague-Dawley rat heart homogenate after 15 mins by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1673248Induction of adipogenesis in human BMMSC cells assessed as increase in ACOX1 mRNA at 1 uM incubated for 3 days by qRT-PCR analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-01, Volume: 27, Issue:13
2-Phenyl-8-(1-phenylallyl)-chromenone compounds have a pan-PPAR modulator pharmacophore.
AID1166260Toxicity in streptozotocin induced diabetic Albino Wistar rat model assessed as induction of portal triad inflammation measured 5 hrs post dose by haematoxylin and eosin staining based microscopy2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-24, Volume: 87Design, synthesis, in silico molecular docking and biological evaluation of novel oxadiazole based thiazolidine-2,4-diones bis-heterocycles as PPAR-γ agonists.
AID156146In vitro transactivation of human Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (hPPARalpha)2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-06, Volume: 46, Issue:23
Large dimeric ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity in vitro and in vivo.
AID1918891Induction of adipogenesis in differentiated human BMMSC cells assessed as fold increase in adiponectin level in presence of IDX by ELISA2022Journal of natural products, 12-23, Volume: 85, Issue:12
Discovery of Pan-peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Modulators from an Endolichenic Fungus,
AID1315304Reversal of insulin resistance in leptin receptor deficient db/db C57BL/KSJ mouse assessed as decrease in serum insulin level administered for 15 consecutive days relative to control2016Journal of natural products, 05-27, Volume: 79, Issue:5
Naturally Occurring Carbazole Alkaloids from Murraya koenigii as Potential Antidiabetic Agents.
AID157275In vitro binding to peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma) using [3H]-BRL 49653 as radioligand in scintillation proximity assay (SPA)1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-03, Volume: 41, Issue:25
N-(2-Benzoylphenyl)-L-tyrosine PPARgamma agonists. 1. Discovery of a novel series of potent antihyperglycemic and antihyperlipidemic agents.
AID1323083Upregulation of ABCA1 mRNA expression in human THP1 cells at 10 uM after 24 hrs by qPCR method relative to control2016Journal of natural products, 06-24, Volume: 79, Issue:6
Leoligin, the Major Lignan from Edelweiss (Leontopodium nivale subsp. alpinum), Promotes Cholesterol Efflux from THP-1 Macrophages.
AID705483Binding affinity to mouse importin-7 by chromatographic analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 55, Issue:19
Chemical proteomics-based analysis of off-target binding profiles for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone: clues for assessing potential for cardiotoxicity.
AID1572808Binding affinity to NAF1 (unknown origin) expressed in human HepG2 cells assessed as increase in mitochondrial respiration at 30 uM relative to wild-type cells2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 04-01, Volume: 29, Issue:7
Binding of thiazolidinediones to the endoplasmic reticulum protein nutrient-deprivation autophagy factor-1.
AID1335111Toxicity in diet-induced obese mouse assessed as change in body weight at 10 mg/kg, po qd administered daily via gavage for 28 days2017ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-12, Volume: 8, Issue:1
Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Novel and Selective G-protein Coupled Receptor 120 (GPR120) Spirocyclic Agonists.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346800Human Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (1C. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors)2000Biochemical and biophysical research communications, Nov-30, Volume: 278, Issue:3
Activation of human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) subtypes by pioglitazone.
AID1346800Human Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (1C. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors)1998The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Feb, Volume: 284, Issue:2
Identification of high-affinity binding sites for the insulin sensitizer rosiglitazone (BRL-49653) in rodent and human adipocytes using a radioiodinated ligand for peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor gamma.
AID1346619Human TRPM3 (Transient Receptor Potential channels)2011Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 79, Issue:6
Rapid and contrasting effects of rosiglitazone on transient receptor potential TRPM3 and TRPC5 channels.
AID1346800Human Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (1C. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors)1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-03, Volume: 41, Issue:25
N-(2-Benzoylphenyl)-L-tyrosine PPARgamma agonists. 1. Discovery of a novel series of potent antihyperglycemic and antihyperlipidemic agents.
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
AID686947qHTS for small molecule inhibitors of Yes1 kinase: Primary Screen2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-01, Volume: 23, Issue:15
Identification of potent Yes1 kinase inhibitors using a library screening approach.
AID493017Wombat Data for BeliefDocking1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-03, Volume: 41, Issue:25
N-(2-Benzoylphenyl)-L-tyrosine PPARgamma agonists. 1. Discovery of a novel series of potent antihyperglycemic and antihyperlipidemic agents.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (4,197)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19901 (0.02)18.7374
1990's134 (3.19)18.2507
2000's1559 (37.15)29.6817
2010's2031 (48.39)24.3611
2020's472 (11.25)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 110.31

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index110.31 (24.57)
Research Supply Index8.55 (2.92)
Research Growth Index6.91 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index202.90 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (110.31)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials824 (18.99%)5.53%
Reviews522 (12.03%)6.00%
Case Studies109 (2.51%)4.05%
Observational21 (0.48%)0.25%
Other2,862 (65.98%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (465)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of MK0431 to Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Glimepiride Alone or in Combination With Metf [NCT00106704]Phase 3441 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Methodological Study To Evaluate The Effects of Single Oral Doses Of Pioglitazone 45 mg And Rosiglitazone 8 mg On Sodium Balance In Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT01088594]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Initial Therapy With Coadministration of Sitagliptin and Pioglitazone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00397631]Phase 3520 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-19Completed
Pioglitazone as an Adjunct for Moderate to Severe Depressive Disorder [NCT01109030]Phase 2/Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of MK0431 to Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Pioglitazone Therapy [NCT00086502]Phase 3353 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
Twelve Weeks of Pioglitazone Therapy Significantly Attenuates Dysmetabolism and Reduces Inflammation in Prevalent Peritoneal Dialysis Patients. A Randomized, Cross-over Trial. [NCT01258322]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
The Effects of Thiazolidinedione on the Diabetic Retinopathy and Nephropathy [NCT01175486]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-07-31Recruiting
Effect of Pioglitazone on Peritoneal Cytokines in Women With Endometriosis [NCT01184144]Phase 2/Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Withdrawn
A Pilot Dose Finding Study of Pioglitazone in Children With ASD [NCT01205282]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial of Pioglitazone and Niacin Extended Release in Non-diabetic Patients With Metabolic Syndrome [NCT00300365]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
Glucose Control in Pre-Diabetic Renal Transplant Patients: Efficacy and Safety of Vildagliptin and Pioglitazone [NCT01346254]Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Measure the Effect of Pioglitazone on Insulin Sensitivity in Healthy Overweight and Obese Males [NCT01115712]Phase 135 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Effects of Pioglitazone on Body Composition,Insulin Sensitivity and Protein Metabolism in ESRD Non Diabetic Individuals [NCT01253928]Phase 416 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-03-31Recruiting
PEARL-DM: Efficacy of Empagliflozin and Pioglitazone in Diabetic Patients With NAFLD; Randomized Controlled Trial From Pakistan. [NCT05942963]Phase 4240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-31Not yet recruiting
Use of Pioglitazone for the Prevention of Radiation-Induced Cognitive Dysfunction [NCT01151670]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Noninvasive Quantification of the Pulmonary Anti-inflammatory Effect of Rosiglitazone [NCT01174056]Early Phase 139 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
An Open-Label, Single Center Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics of Pioglitazone in Healthy Subjects When Administered Alone and in Combination With Fostamatinib 100 mg Twice Daily [NCT01309854]Phase 115 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
"Pioglitazone and Risk of Bladder Cancer in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes MellitusPROBE-PIOStudy" [NCT01935466]6,107 participants (Actual)Observational2013-07-31Completed
Effect of Pioglitazone on Oxidative Load, Inflammatory End-Points and Vascular Reactivity in Obese Non-Diabetic Patients: A Dose Ranging Study [NCT01161394]Phase 424 participants (Anticipated)InterventionalCompleted
Can Addition of Pioglitazone to SGLT2 Inhibitor in Type 1 Diabetic Patients Amplify the Decrease in HbA1c and Prevent the Increase in Plasma Ketone Concentration? [NCT03878459]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-08Recruiting
Preservation of Beta Cell Function in Pre-diabetes in Subject With Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) and Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) [NCT02969798]700 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-01-01Recruiting
To Evaluate the Effect of Nesinaact on Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis Through MRI and Liver Fibroscan in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Single-Center Clinical Study [NCT03950505]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-29Recruiting
[NCT01331967]Phase 494 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
An Open-label, Randomized, Active-controlled Study to Compare the Effect of DPP-IV Inhibitor and TZD as add-on Therapy to Metformin on Glycemic Variability and Oxidative Stress in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Monoth [NCT01339143]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-04-30Recruiting
Incretin-based Drugs and the Risk of Heart Failure: A Multi-center Network Observational Study [NCT02456428]1,499,650 participants (Actual)Observational2014-03-31Completed
Pioglitazone Treatment for Hyperglycemic Acute Ischemic Stroke: Effects on the Stress-Immune Response [NCT04123067]Phase 1/Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-01Terminated(stopped due to Temporarily suspended due to Pandemic.)
Does Glycated Hemoglobin Variability in Type 2 Diabetes Differ Depending on the Diabetes Treatment Threshold Used in the Qatari Population: Implication on Diabetes Complication Risk? [NCT02879409]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-30Active, not recruiting
Pioglitazone in Alzheimer Disease Progression [NCT00982202]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
A Long-Term, Open-Label Extension Study to Investigate the Long-Term Safety of SYR-322 When Used in Combination With Thiazolidine in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes in Japan [NCT01318122]Phase 2/Phase 3336 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Comparison of The Effects of Thiazolidinediones(TZD), Sodium- Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors(SGLT2i) Alone and TZD / SGLT2i Combination Therapy on Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Fatty Liver [NCT03646292]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-19Recruiting
Phase IIB Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of ACTOplus Met® XR in Subjects With Stage I-IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity or Oropharynx Prior to Definitive Treatment [NCT02917629]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual combined with expiration of study drug)
Comparison of Metformin and Pioglitazone in Regulating Menstrual Irregularities and Hyperandrogenism [NCT03757923]Phase 1/Phase 2110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-18Recruiting
A Study of Pleiotropic Pioglitazone Effects on the Alcoholic Lung (APPEAL Study) [NCT03060772]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-03Terminated(stopped due to Study was suspended in 2020 due to COVID-19 pandemic as a result of recruitment challenges and the inability to conduct all study procedures (e.g., bronchoscopy) per protocol. In late 2021 the decision was made to not re-open the study.)
A Prospective Observational Cohort Study; The Weight Trajectory in New Users of Sulfonylureas as Add on Therapy Next to Metformin. [NCT02133118]16,293 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]1998-01-31Completed
Comparison of Combined Pioglitazone and SGLT2 Inhibitors vs. DPP4 Inhibitors in Diabetic Patients With Ischemic Stroke: Rationale and Study Design [NCT04419337]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-15Recruiting
Enhancement of Brown Adipose Tissue Function Via Chronic Pharmacological Treatment [NCT02236962]42 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-04-30Recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Active Controlled, Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Muraglitazar (BMS-298585) Compared to Pioglitazone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control [NCT00106808]Phase 31,440 participants Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Relative Bioavailability of Two Fixed Dose Combination Tablets of Linagliptin 5 mg/Pioglitazone 45 mg Compared With Single Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 45 mg Tablets Administered Together to Healthy Male and Female Subjects (Open, Randomised, Single [NCT02183636]Phase 139 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Effect of Combination Therapy With Dapagliflozin Plus Low Dose Pioglitazone on Hospitalization Rate in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [NCT03794518]Phase 3648 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-31Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pioglitazone on Endothelial Function in Premenopausal Women With Uncomplicated Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial [NCT01322308]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Open, Randomized, Phase I Study in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Metformin to Evaluate the Effect of AZD1656 on the Pharmacokinetics of Pioglitazone and Vice Versa [NCT01082120]Phase 128 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
A Phase 1, Open Label, Randomized, Crossover, Drug Interaction Study of the Pharmacokinetics of ASP1941 and Pioglitazone Hydrochloride After Separate and Concomitant Administration to Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT01088919]Phase 164 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Relative Bioavailability of Both BI 1356 and Pioglitazone After Co-administration Compared to the Bioavailability of Multiple Oral Doses of BI 1356 10 mg qd Alone and Pioglitazone 45 mg qd Alone in Healthy Male and Female Volunteers (an Open Label, Random [NCT02183337]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
The Use of Incretin-based Drugs and the Risk of Acute Pancreatitis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT02476760]1,417,914 participants (Actual)Observational2014-03-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind (Double Dummy), Active Controlled Study to Compare the Safety, Tolerability and Effect on Glycemic Control of Taspoglutide Versus Pioglitazone in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Inadequately Controlled on Therapy With Sulf [NCT00909597]Phase 3756 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
A Phase IV, Multicenter, Randomized, Active Comparator Controlled Study of the Addition of Pioglitazone Compared With Glimepiride in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin and Alogliptin [NCT02426294]Phase 4154 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-02-28Recruiting
A Prospective, Non-Interventional Study of the Use of Alogliptin and Alogliptin Fixed-Dose Combinations With Pioglitazone and With Metformin in Standard Clinical Practice [NCT02989649]593 participants (Actual)Observational2016-12-22Terminated(stopped due to Business Decision; No Safety Or Efficacy Concerns)
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Comparison of the Effects of Two Doses of LY2189265 or Exenatide on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Stable Doses of Metformin and Pioglitazone (AWARD-1: Assessment of Weekly Administration of LY2189265 [NCT01064687]Phase 3978 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Long-term Use of Alogliptin/Pioglitazone Combination Tablets in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT01990300]3,281 participants (Actual)Observational2011-11-28Completed
Pioglitazone, Lipotoxicity, and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) [NCT05838287]Phase 478 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-10Recruiting
A Randomised Controlled Trial for People With Established Type 2 Diabetes During Ramadan: Liraglutide vs. a Sulphonylurea [NCT02292290]Phase 499 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Effects of Combined Resveratrol and Myo-inositol on Altered Metabolic, Endocrine Parameters and Perceived Stress in Patients With Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome [NCT04867252]Phase 288 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-03Completed
A Prospective, Randomized Trial to Compare saroGLitazar With pioglitAZone in Nonalcoholic Fatty livEr Disease (GLAZED Trial) [NCT02265276]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-10-31Recruiting
Effect of Glimepiride, Vildagliptin, Pioglitazone and Canagliflozin on Durability of Glycemic Control After Metformin Failure in Type 2 Diabetes [NCT02142309]Phase 4450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-10-31Recruiting
Pioglitazone as a Treatment for Lipid and Glucose Abnormalities In Patients With Schizophrenia Treated With Antipsychotic Medication And Potential Effects on Cognitive Function [NCT00231894]Phase 456 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
A One-Year Phase 3, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of AD 4833-536 in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01124656]Phase 326 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Formulation issues.)
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of MK0431 in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control [NCT00094757]Phase 3521 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-06Completed
A Study on the Effects of Peroxisome Proliferators Activated Receptor-γ Agonists on Certain Biochemical and Inflammatory Markers in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome [NCT00926341]Phase 4110 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Insulin Resistance Intervention After Stroke (IRIS) Trial [NCT00091949]Phase 33,876 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
GlitazOne Treatment for Coronavirus HypoxiA, a Safety and Tolerability Open Label With Matching Cohort Pilot Study [NCT04473274]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-21Completed
Pathophysiology of Uric Acid Nephrolithiasis [NCT00904046]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-05Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of CKD-501 or Pioglitazone Added to Ongoing Metformin Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Alone: Multi Center, Randomized, Double Blind, Therapeutic Confirmatory Study [NCT01106131]Phase 3253 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Insulin Regulation of Lipolysis and Lipolysis Proteins [NCT03866408]Early Phase 164 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-12Recruiting
Comparison of Glimepiride, Alogliptin and Alogliptin+Pioglitazone Combination in Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT04470310]Phase 499 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Active, not recruiting
Effect of Inhaled Insulin (AERx® iDMS) Plus Pioglitazone Versus Pioglitazone Alone on HbA1c in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00411892]Phase 3196 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-29Terminated(stopped due to See termination reason in detailed description)
A Phase III Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ASP1941 in Combination With Pioglitazone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Pioglitazone Alone [NCT01225081]Phase 3152 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-15Completed
Effect of Pioglitazone Administered to Patients With Adrenomyeloneuropathy: a Phase II, Single-arm, Multicentric Clinical Trial [NCT03864523]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
An Efficacy and Tolerability Study of MK0533 in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control [NCT00543959]Phase 2346 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Terminated(stopped due to This study is being discontinued based on data suggesting that none of the doses tested demonstrated both glycemic & body fluid benefits vs. the comparitor)
Efficacy of Pioglitazone Hydrochloride and Metformin Hydrochloride Tablets on the Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Combined With Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease:an Multicenter,Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel- Controlled Study. [NCT03796975]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-28Completed
A Multicenter, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Randomized, Parallel, Phase IV Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Evogliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Diseases [NCT03910361]Phase 451 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-12Completed
A Randomized, Partially Blinded, Pilot Study of the Effects of Pioglitazone on HCV RNA in Overweight Subjects With Chronic HCV Genotypes 1 or 4 Infection. [NCT01157975]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study was completed in another site)
A Phase 2/3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of SYR-322 When Used in Combination With Thiazolidine in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes in Japan [NCT01318070]Phase 2/Phase 3339 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Study of the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics (PK), and Pharmacodynamics (PD) of SAD and MAD of CORT125281 in Healthy Subjects [NCT03335956]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-21Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose, 4-Period Crossover Study to Determine the Bioequivalence of Alogliptin (25 mg) and Pioglitazone (15 and 30 mg) When Administered as Individual Tablets and as Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets to Healthy Russian Subjects [NCT03501277]Phase 172 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-26Completed
Adipose Tissue Heterogeneity and Its Link to Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Open Intervention Study That Compares Empagliflozin, Pioglitazone and Semaglutide [NCT05501483]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-08Recruiting
A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Investigate the Neuroendocrine Effects of Pioglitazone in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Cachexia [NCT05919147]Phase 224 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-18Recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Pioglitazone on Insulin Resistance, Insulin Secretion and Atherosclerosis in Renal Allograft Recipients Without History of Diabetes [NCT00598013]83 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
Biphasic Insulin Aspart 70/30 + Metformin Compared to Insulin Glargine + Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes Failing OAD Therapy [NCT00598793]Phase 3242 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Combination Study of Pioglitazone and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients After Failure of a First TKIs Discontinuation Attempt in Order to Prepare a New Stop [NCT02889003]Phase 226 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-12-31Recruiting
NAFLD in T2DM: Prevalence in Hispanics and Role of Treatment [NCT01002547]Phase 4105 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-24Completed
A Phase IIb, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Range Finding Clinical Trial to Study the Safety and Efficacy of MK-3102 in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Inadequate Glycemic Control [NCT01217073]Phase 2685 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-08Completed
Long-term Role of Pioglitazone in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). [NCT00994682]Phase 4176 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Two-Part,Multicenter,Randomized,Double-Blind,Placebo-Controlled,Study to Evaluate the Effect of Simvastatin,Losartan,and Pioglitazone on Cardiovascular Disease Biomarkers in Lower Extremity Atherosclerotic Plaque Excised From Patients w/PAD [NCT00720577]Early Phase 1164 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
TriMaster: Randomised Double-Blind Crossover Study of a DPP4 Inhibitor, SGLT2 Inhibitor and Thiazolidinedione as Third Line Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Suboptimal Glycaemic Control on Dual Therapy With Metformin and a Sulphonylurea [NCT02653209]Phase 4525 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-01Completed
A Phase 4, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo on Bone Metabolism in Impaired Fasting Glucose, Postmenopausal Women for One Year of Treatment [NCT00708175]Phase 4156 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Targeting Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients - Will it Reduce Inflammation, Atherosclerosis, Calcification and Improve Survival of Peritoneal Dialysis Patients? (PROOF Trial) [NCT00745225]Phase 4160 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Pioglitazone and Exercise Effects on Older Adults With MCI and Metabolic Syndrome [NCT00736996]Phase 278 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
A Study on the Anti-proteinuric Effects of Pioglitazone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. [NCT00749047]Phase 412 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo, and Active Comparator-controlled, Parallel-group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Rivoglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00571519]Phase 394 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-14Terminated(stopped due to DSPD focusing on Study 301 to confirm the clinical profile before proceeding. Daiichi Sankyo Pharma Development terminated this study on 23 Apr 2008 because of changes in the clinical development plan with 94 of 2600 planned, randomized participants.)
Effect of Pioglitazone Compared to a Combination Therapy With Ramipril and to a Ramipril Monotherapy on Low Grade Inflammation and Vascular Function in Patients With Increased Cardiovascular Risk and an Activated Inflammation. A Randomized Double-blinded [NCT00770497]Phase 2172 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Double Blinded Study of the Effects of Pioglitazone in Combination With Atorvastatin in Comparison to Atorvastatin Treatment Alone on Intima-Media Thickness in Patients at Risk for Vascular Complications [NCT00770575]Phase 2148 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
A Pilot Study of Therapy With Pioglitazone Prior to HCV Treatment in HIV-1 and HCV Genotype 1-Infected Subjects With Insulin Resistance Who Are Prior Nonresponders to Peginterferon and Ribavirin Therapy [NCT00665353]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Myocardial Function, Free Fatty Acid and Glucose Metabolism in HIV Metabolic Syndrome [NCT00656851]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Pilot Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Pioglitazone as an Anti-inflammatory Agent for the Treatment of CF Lung Disease in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis [NCT00322868]21 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Effect of Pioglitazone Administered to Patients With Friedreich's ATAXIA:Proof of Concept [NCT00811681]Phase 340 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Prevention of Neointimal Proliferation With Aggressive Reduction of Glucose Concentrations (Pioglitazone) Study -- PPAR-G -- An IVUS Pilot Feasibility Study in Type 2 Diabetic Patients. [NCT00819325]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-08-31Completed
Role of Pioglitazone and Berberine in Treatment of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease(NAFLD) Patients With Impaired Glucose Regulation or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00633282]Phase 2184 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-and Active-Controlled, Multi-center Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-379 in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00722917]Phase 2323 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Animal Toxicity Findings)
Effect of Pioglitazone on Inflammatory Response and Clinical Outcome in T2DM Patients With COVID-19 [NCT04604223]Phase 41,506 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-18Recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Effect of Taspoglutide on Glycemic Control Compared to Placebo in Patients With Type II Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Plus [NCT00744367]Phase 3326 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Vildagliptin in Combination With Pioglitazone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00099853]Phase 3362 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin Compared to Pioglitazone in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients With Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis [NCT05254626]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-01Recruiting
Combination of Pioglitazone and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) in Relapsed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Following a First TKI Discontinuation [NCT02730195]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Terminated
Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Therapy for Chronic Granulomatous Disease Patients With Severe Infection. [NCT03080480]Phase 1/Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-01Terminated(stopped due to The results are negtive.)
A Phase I Study of Pioglitazone and Carboplatin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT02133625]Phase 128 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
The Role of Pioglitazone in Vascular Transcriptional Remodeling in Individuals Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting [NCT05775380]Phase 420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-15Recruiting
Combined Pioglitazone and Clomophene Citrate Versus Combined Metformin and Clomiphene Citrate as First Treatment in Infertile Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome [NCT03566225]Early Phase 1400 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-30Completed
Randomized Phase II Trial With Safety run-in Phase Evaluating Low-dose AZA, ATRA and Pioglitazone Versus Standard Dose Azacitidine in Patients >=60 Years With AML Who Are Refractory to Standard Induction Chemotherapy [NCT02942758]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-10Terminated(stopped due to Due to financial reasons.)
First in Human Study of Pioglitazone Therapy of Autoimmune Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis [NCT03231033]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-17Completed
Effect of Short-term Basal Insulin Initiation in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes on 1-year Glycemic Control [NCT06107153]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-01Not yet recruiting
Relative Bioavailability of Pioglitazone After Co-administration With Different Doses of BI 10773 in Healthy Volunteers (an Open-label, Randomised, Crossover, Clinical Phase I Study) [NCT02172235]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Quantitation of Hepatic Mitochondrial Fluxes in Humans With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) [NCT05305287]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-01Recruiting
Mechanism of Hyperglycemia and Neuroprotection Effect of Pioglitazone in Acute Ischemic Stroke [NCT02195791]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Diffculty in participant enrollment)
Effect of Pioglitazone on Sputum Biomarkers of Inflammation and Lung Epithelial Repair in Cystic Fibrosis [NCT00719381]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
ANRS HC 22, PEGLIST-C, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial of Pioglitazone vs. Placebo in Association With Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C, Non 2 or 3 Genotypes and Insulin Resistance [NCT00927290]Phase 340 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-03Terminated(stopped due to Suspension of use of medicine containing Pioglitazone by French regulatory agency)
Prospective Cohort Study on MAFLD-related Cirrhosis Prevention and Treatment Strategies [NCT06135584]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-18Not yet recruiting
Targeting Residual Activity By Precision, Biomarker-Guided Combination Therapies of Multiple Sclerosis (TRAP-MS) [NCT03109288]Phase 1/Phase 2250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-11Recruiting
Influence of Glitazones on the Vasodilatory Effect of HDL Lipoproteins and on Phospholipase A2 [NCT00953498]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Metabolic and Cardiovascular Complications in Men With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Long-term Androgen Deprivation Therapy [NCT00743327]1 participants (Actual)Observational2008-10-31Terminated(stopped due to No Participants completed study)
A Pilot Study of Intensive Insulin Regimen as a Primary Treatment of New Onset of Type 2 DM [NCT01087567]Phase 423 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
A Double-blind, Randomized 12-week Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of GSK189075 Tablets vs Pioglitazone in Treatment Naive Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00500331]Phase 2334 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-23Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Effects on Glycemic Control With Concomitantly Administered Pioglitazone HCl and Metformin HCl Extended Release (Fortamet®) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00754403]Phase 4312 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of MK0431 to Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin Therapy [NCT00086515]Phase 3701 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of SYR-322 Plus Pioglitazone HCl (Actos®), SYR-322 Alone or Pioglitazone HCl Alone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00395512]Phase 3655 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Effect of Pioglitazone Compared With Metformin on Endothelial Microparticles in Type 2 Diabetes. A Randomized Trial [NCT00815399]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Use of Oral Antidiabetic Agents in Hospitalized Patients With Diabetes [NCT04416269]Phase 4260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-07Recruiting
A Phase 1, Open-label, Fixed-sequence, 2-cohort, 2-period Study To Investigate The Effect Of Modafinil And Pioglitazone Given As Multiple Doses On Single Dose Pharmacokinetics Of Palbociclib (Pd-0332991) In Healthy Volunteers [NCT02222441]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability Study of 45 mg Pioglitazone in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Receiving Standard Therapy (Riluzole) [NCT00690118]Phase 2219 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Terminated(stopped due to The interim analysis showed no tendency in favour of the verum group. Therefore it was decided to stop the study prematurely.)
Effect of Acarbose and Fixed Mixture of Pioglitazone and Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Anti-diabetic Monotherapy [NCT05629806]Phase 350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-10Recruiting
Pioglitazone and Serum Asymmetric Dimethylarginine (ADMA) in Patients With Diabetes [NCT00770367]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label Study of the Effect of PEGASYS ® Plus COPEGUS® With or Without Concomitant Pioglitazone (Actos®) on Early Viral Kinetics in Treatment-naive Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C, Genotype-1, and Insulin Resistance [NCT00545233]Phase 4155 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Effect of Pioglitazone 15 mg or 30 mg on Microcirculation in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Treated With Insulin [NCT00676260]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
Non-blinded, Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial of Pioglitazone Treatment in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Covid-19 [NCT04535700]Phase 48 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-18Completed
Effect of Low-Dose Pioglitazone in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) [NCT04501406]Phase 2166 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-15Recruiting
Effects of PPAR Ligands on Ectopic Fat Accumulation and Inflammation in Subjects With Impaired Glucose Tolerance [NCT00470262]27 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
To Compare the Efficacy and Safety Between Pioglitazone Added to Combination Therapy of Sulfonylurea Plus Metformin and Placebo Control Group in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00991055]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-05-31Recruiting
"A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BMS-477118 in Combination With Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin Alone" [NCT00121667]Phase 31,462 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study of Pioglitazone for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Asthma in Obese Asthmatics. (The GLITZ Asthma Study) [NCT00787644]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Terminated(stopped due to new safety concerns which emerged about pioglitazone during the trial)
Effects of Pioglitazone on Platelet Function [NCT00861341]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 2-arm Parallel-group, Multicenter Study With a 24-week Main Treatment Period and an Extension Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of AVE0010 on Top of Pioglitazone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Not Adequate [NCT00763815]Phase 3484 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Dapagliflozin in Combination With Thiazolidinedione Therapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Con [NCT00683878]Phase 3972 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Pioglitazone for Hepatic Steatosis in HIV/HCV Co-infection [NCT00742326]Phase 413 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Enrollment stopped prior to complete enrollment due to slow accrual)
Effect of Insulin Sensitizer Therapy on Atherothrombotic and Inflammatory Profiles Associated With Insulin Resistance [NCT00443755]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Monitoring Insulin Levels and Treating Hyperinsulinemia and Hyperglycemia With Pioglitazone in Patients Treated With Alpelisib for Metastatic Breast Cancer. [NCT05753657]Early Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-25Recruiting
A Phase II, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Pioglitazone HCl (ACTOS™) in Combination With TAK-536 in Subjects With Type II Diabetes [NCT00762736]Phase 2704 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
Pilot Trial Studying the Effects of Pioglitazone in Comparison to Placebo on Myocardial Function and Oxidative Stress in Patients With Type II Diabetes and Insulin Resistance Undergoing Elective PTCA. A Randomized Double-blinded Phase II Study. [NCT00771004]Phase 263 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Effects of Pioglitazone on Metabolic Syndrome in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Metformin [NCT00772174]Phase 3418 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Effects on Incidence of Cardiovascular Events of the Addition of Pioglitazone as Compared With a Sulphonylurea in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Inadequately Controlled With Metformin. [NCT00700856]Phase 43,371 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-09-30Active, not recruiting
Detection of Plaque Inflammation and Visualization of Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Pioglitazone on Plaque Inflammation in Subjects With Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by FDG-PET/CT [NCT00722631]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Response of Individuals With Ataxia-Telangiectasia to Metformin and Pioglitazone [NCT02733679]Phase 427 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-29Completed
A 24-Week,Int.,Rand.,Double-blind,Parallel-group,Multi-centre, Plac.-Controlled Phase III Study With a 24-Wk Ext.Per.to Eval.the Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin in Comb.With Glimepiride (a Sulphonylurea) in Subjects With Type2 Diab.Who Have Inadeq. G [NCT00680745]Phase 3597 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Impact of Pioglitazone, Metformin and the Combination of Both on Cardiovascular Risk in Insulin-treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes - The PIOcomb Study [NCT00770445]Phase 4121 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Effects of Pioglitazone on Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Vascular Complications - The SPLENDOR Study. [NCT00770835]Phase 439 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
A Single Stage Phase II, Multi-centre, Open Label Study of Imatinib in Combination With Pioglitazone, Etoricoxib, Dexamethasone and Low-dose Treosulfane for Anti-inflammatory and Angiostatic Treatment in Patients With Hormone-refractory Prostate Cancer [NCT00427999]Phase 267 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial to Examine the Safety and Suitability of Supplementing Early Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Clot Evacuation of Basal Ganglia Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH) With Pioglitazone [NCT05582707]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-08Recruiting
Phase II Study of Chronic Pancreatitis and the Effect of Pioglitazone on Endocrine Function, Exocrine Function & Structure, Pain & Life Quality [NCT00782795]Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Inflammation and Insulin Resistance in Rheumatoid Arthritis [NCT00763139]34 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Triglyceride Changes in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Dyslipidemia Following Treatment Conversion From Rosiglitazone to Pioglitazone HCl in Combination With Stable Statin Therapy [NCT00672919]Phase 4305 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group 24 Week Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of BI 1356 (5 mg) in Combination With 30 mg Pioglitazone (Both Administered Orally Once Daily), Compared to 30 mg Pioglitazone Plus Placebo in D [NCT00641043]Phase 3389 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
A Study Of Metabolic Factors And Efficacy Of Pentoxifylline Versus Pioglitazone In Lean And Obese Nash (Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis) Patients. [NCT00681733]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-01-31Recruiting
Cortisol Regulation in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome [NCT00694759]37 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
A Randomised, Double-blind Parallel Group Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Initial Combination Therapy With Linagliptin 5 mg + Pioglitazone 15 mg, 30 mg, or 45 mg, vs. Monotherapy With Pioglitazone (15 mg, 30 mg, or 45 mg) or Linagliptin 5 mg O [NCT01183013]Phase 3936 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
48 Week Pilot Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Pioglitazone, Atorvastatin, Pegasys and Weight Based Ribavirin in Chronic Hepatitis C, Genotype 1 Patients Who Have Previously Relapsed or Did Not Respond to PegInterferon /Ribavirin Therapy [NCT00926614]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) Agonist in Inducing Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Regression in Diabetic End-Stage Renal Disease Patients [NCT00745914]22 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide Once Weekly Injection Versus Metformin, Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor, or Thiazolidinedione as Monotherapy in Drug-Naive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00676338]Phase 3820 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Comparison of the Effects of Pioglitazone and Metformin on Resistin Plasma Levels in Children With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01396564]Phase 1/Phase 256 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Effect of Pioglitazone on Insulin Resistance, Progression of Atherosclerosis and Clinical Course of Coronary Heart Disease [NCT03011775]Phase 443 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Parallel-group, Adaptive Design Phase IIb/III, Multicenter Study, to Assess the Efficacy of Polychemotherapy for Inducing Remission of Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes. [NCT04271189]Phase 2/Phase 3180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Active, not recruiting
Comparison of the Effects of Pioglitazone vs. Placebo When Given in Addition to Standard Insulin Treatment in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Renal Failure [NCT00770640]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Effects of Pioglitazone in Combination With Glimepiride in Comparison to Glimepiride Monotherapy on Metabolic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00770952]Phase 391 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
A Phase III Randomized, Active-Comparator (Pioglitazone) Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of the MK0431A (A Fixed-Dose Combination Tablet of Sitagliptin and Metformin) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00532935]Phase 3517 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-26Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active Comparator-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Rivoglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00484198]Phase 31,912 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-23Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Multiple Dosing, Three-way Crossover Clinical Trial to Investigate the Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction of LC15-0444 and Pioglitazone After Oral Administration in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT01001013]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Pioglitazone Therapy in Obese Children With Insulin Resistance: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study [NCT00775164]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Inadequate enrollment)
Pharmacogenomics of Thiazolidinediones [NCT01135394]114 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Arm, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Met [NCT01106690]Phase 3344 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Study of Pioglitazone Hydrochloride in Allergic Asthma [NCT00604578]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-04Withdrawn
A Phase III Randomized, Active-Comparator (Pioglitazone) Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of Sitagliptin and MK0431A (A Fixed-Dose Combination Tablet of Sitagliptin and Metformin) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00541450]Phase 3492 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-15Completed
Effects of Triple Drug Cocktail Therapy on Metabolic, Endocrine Alterations and Perceived Stress Response in Patients With PCOS: A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04113889]Phase 2147 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-15Completed
Pioglitazone for the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder and Comorbid Metabolic Syndrome or Insulin Resistance [NCT00835120]Phase 434 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Effect of Pioglitazone With and Without Exenatide on Body Weight, Fat Topography, Beta Cell Function, and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT00845182]Phase 443 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
A Phase III Study of MP-513 in Combination With Thiazolidinedione in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT01026194]Phase 3204 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
A 78 Week Open Label Extension to Trials Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of BI 1356 (5 mg) as Monotherapy or in Combination With Other Antidiabetic Medications in Type 2 Diabetic Patients. [NCT00736099]Phase 32,122 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Co-Administration of Sitagliptin and Pioglitazone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control [NCT00722371]Phase 31,615 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-05Completed
Safety of Pioglitazone for Hematoma Resolution In Intracerebral Hemorrhage [NCT00827892]Phase 284 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Phase 1 Study of Pioglitazone Versus Metformin on Bone Health in Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01935804]Phase 2440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A Phase I Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Efficacy, and Mechanism of Action of Sitagliptin and Pioglitazone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Diet and Exercis [NCT00511108]Phase 1211 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-11Completed
A Pilot Study of Pioglitazone as Second Line Therapy for Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas With Disease Progression After Gemcitabine Based Chemotherapy [NCT00867126]Early Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-02Terminated(stopped due to low accrual)
Effects of Pioglitazone in Glucocorticoid-Induced Insulin Resistance. Studies in Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. [NCT00151710]0 participants InterventionalCompleted
PROspective PioglitAzone Clinical Trial In MacroVascular Events: A Macrovascular Outcome Study in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Comparing Pioglitazone With Placebo in Addition to Existing Therapy [NCT00174993]Phase 34,373 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-05-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Single-Sequence Crossover Study in Healthy Subjects to Determine the Effect of Relacorilant on Exposure to Probe Substrates for Cytochrome P450s 3A4, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, and 2D6 [NCT03457597]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-06Completed
A Randomized, Phase 3, Double Blind, Multicentre Trial, Evaluating the Effect of Pioglitazone Versus Placebo on Change in Lipoatrophy in HIV- 1 Infected Patients Treated With Stable Antiretroviral Therapy for at Least 6 Months.ANRS 113 LIPIOT Study [NCT00148850]Phase 3130 participants Interventional2003-02-28Terminated
National, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Triple-dummy, Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Piemonte Association in the Treatment of Type II Diabetes Mellitus [NCT05028140]Phase 3480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-30Not yet recruiting
Skeletal Muscle Dysfunction in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) [NCT02535832]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Characterization of Vascular Effects of Candesartan and Pioglitazone. [NCT00154037]40 participants Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Molecular Mechanisms of Endothelial Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00816218]Phase 439 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Comparator-Controlled Study In Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Comparing the Effects of Pioglitazone HCl Versus Glimepiride on the Rate of Progression of Coronary Atherosclerotic Disease as Measured by Intravascular Ultr [NCT00225277]Phase 3547 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
Assessment of the Efficacy of Pioglitazone on Viral Kinetics, Cytokines, and Innate Immunity in a Group of Insulin Resistant, Treatment Naïve, Chronic Hepatitis C, Genotype 1 Patients [NCT00926016]23 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin in Combination With Metformin IR as Initial Therapy Compared to Saxagliptin Monotherapy and to Metformin IR Monotherapy in Subjects [NCT00327015]Phase 31,306 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of the Addition of SYR-322 25 mg Versus Dose Titration From 30 mg to 45 mg of Pioglitazone HCl (ACTOS®) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Contro [NCT00432276]Phase 3803 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Pioglitazone for Hepatic Steatosis in HIV [NCT00441272]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
MK0431 (Sitagliptin) Phase III Clinical Study -Pioglitazone add-on Study for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00372060]Phase 3134 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-21Completed
Third-line Therapy of Multiple Myeloma With Lenalidomide in Combination With Pioglitazone, Dexamethasone and Metronomic Low-dose Chemotherapy With Treosulfan [NCT01010243]Phase 1/Phase 254 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-10-31Recruiting
Effects of Pioglitazone on the Regulation of Insulin Secretion in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00656864]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of SYR110322 (SYR-322) When Used in Combination With Pioglitazone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00286494]Phase 3493 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis [NCT01068444]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
An Open-label, Multi-center, Randomized Study Comparing the Effects of Oral Hypoglycemic Agents on Viral Kinetics of Chronic Hepatitis C Patients Receiving Pegylated Interferon Alfa 2b Plus Ribavirin [NCT01025765]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-11-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Open-label Study to Evaluate the Effect of Multiple Doses of MDV3100 (ASP9785) on the Pharmacokinetics of Substrates for CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4 in Patients With Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT01911728]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-25Completed
Effect of Pioglitazone on Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00232362]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to This study was not conducted as the Principal Investigator left the institution)
Pioglitazone Regress Left Ventricular Mass in Type 2 Diabetes With Ischeamia Heart Disease [NCT01947790]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Effect of Pioglitazone Treatment in Patient's Calcific Aortic Valve Disease With Mild Aortic Valve Stenosis [NCT05875675]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-01Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Metformin and Pioglitazone Effects on Serum YKL-40 Concentrations in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01963663]84 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Effect of Pioglitazone on Portal and Systemic Hemodynamics in Patients With Advanced Cirrhosis [NCT00570622]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Chiglitazar Sodium in the Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT05760677]Phase 1142 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-01Enrolling by invitation
Insulin Resistance in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (Protocol Drug Change From Project Career Development Award (CDA)-2-044-08S) [NCT01289639]11 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Low recruitment in intervention study. Baseline data published.)
Sleep, Metabolic, and Cardiovascular Dysfunction in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome [NCT00203996]Phase 437 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Did not meet target patient accrual goals)
Phase IIB Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial of Pioglitazone for Oral Premalignant Lesions an Inter-consortium Collaborative Study [NCT00951379]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Due to slow accrual.)
Effect of Pioglitazone on Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases 3 (TIMP-3) and TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor)-α Converting Enzyme (TACE) in Skeletal Muscle and Their Circulating Substrates. [NCT01223196]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Comparative Effects of Metformin and Pioglitazone on Fetuin-A and Osteoprotegerin Concentrations in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02027103]102 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
A Pilot Study to Determine the Effects of Short-term Thiazolidinedione Treatment on Vascular Risk Markers in Type 2 Diabetes Patients [NCT00571506]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose and Active Comparator-Controlled Dose-Response Study of Rivoglitazone (CS-011) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00575874]Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Effect of Metformin and Pioglitazone on Insulin Signaling in Skeletal Muscle [NCT03452267]Phase 2/Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of funding)
A Single Center, Open-Label, Drug Interaction Study of MGL-3196 With Pioglitazone and to Assess Food Effect in Healthy Subjects [NCT04671056]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-09Completed
The Role of Acute Combined Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPAR) Alpha and Gamma Stimulation on Insulin Action in Humans [NCT00179400]Phase 418 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-12-31Completed
Efficacy of Adding Sitagliptin or Pioglitazone to Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Insufficiently Controlled With Metformin and Sulfonylurea [NCT01195090]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Comparing SYR-322 Alone and Combination SYR-322 With Pioglitazone Versus Placebo on Postprandial Lipids in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00655863]Phase 371 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of SYR-322 (SYR110322) and Pioglitazone HCl (ACTOS®), in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00328627]Phase 31,554 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin (BMS477118) in Combination With Thiazolidinedione Therapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control [NCT00295633]Phase 3565 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
A Randomised Controlled Trial for People With Established Type 2 Diabetes During Ramadan: Canagliflozin (Invokana™) vs. Standard Dual Therapy Regimen: The 'Can Do Ramadan' Study [NCT02694263]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
Candidate Therapies in Combination or Sequentially With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Phase-chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Patients in CCR Without Achieving a Deep Molecular Response: an Adaptative Trial Based on a Drop Loser Design [NCT02767063]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-07-31Recruiting
An Extension Study of Protocol ALO-IIT(PEAK Study) to Examine the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Metformin + Alogliptin + Pioglitazone Triple Combination Therapy in the Korean Type 2 Diabetes Patients [NCT02763007]Phase 441 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-18Terminated(stopped due to difficulty in recruiting patients)
A Randomized, Open-label, Multiple Dosing, Three-way Crossover Clinical Trial to Investigate the Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Drug-drug Interaction of Evogliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg [NCT02753803]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-27Completed
A 30-Week Extension to: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Initial Therapy With Coadministration of Sitagliptin and Pioglitazone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT01028391]Phase 3317 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-01Completed
Differences in Metabolic and Cardiovascular Effects of Pioglitazone vs. Insulin Glargine in the Treatment of Secondary Drug Failure in Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00609856]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Phase 2 Study to Assess the Safety and Efficiency of Pioglitazone in Combination With Imatinib Mesylate to Treat Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Patients [NCT02687425]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-02-29Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Durability of Glucagon Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RA)/Thiazolidinedione Versus Basal Bolus Insulin Therapy in Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetic Patients (T2DM) Patients on Sulfonylurea Plus Metformin [NCT02887625]410 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-02-28Recruiting
Response of Gut Microbiota in Type 2 Diabetes to Hypoglycemic Agents [NCT04287387]Phase 4180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-02Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Dapagliflozin in Combination With Metformin in Asian Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Me [NCT01095666]Phase 31,484 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Single-Dose Food In Vivo Bioequivalence Study of Pioglitazone HCl Tablets (45 mg; Mylan) to Actos® Tablets (45 mg; Takeda) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00649012]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active-Controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Albiglutide Administered in Combination With Metformin and Glimepiride Compared With Metformin Plus Glimepiride and Placeb [NCT00839527]Phase 3685 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Single-Dose Fasting In Vivo Bioequivalence Study of Pioglitazone HCl Tablets (45 mg; Mylan) and Actos® Tablets (45 mg; Takeda) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00649558]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
A Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of Sitagliptin (MK-0431) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Combination Therapy With Metformin and Pi [NCT00885352]Phase 3313 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-15Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of Sitagliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on a Sulfonylurea in Combination With Metformin [NCT01076075]Phase 3427 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-03Completed
Durability of Early Initial Combination Therapy With Exenatide/Pioglitazone/Metformin vs Conventional Therapy in New Onset Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01107717]Phase 4521 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Active, not recruiting
[NCT02875821]Phase 444 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-26Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo- and Active Comparator-Controlled, 4-Week Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Multiple Oral Doses of JNJ-41443532 in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT01230749]Phase 289 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
AVANDIA CV Outcomes Study: Thiazolidinedione Intervention With Vitamin D Evaluation (TIDE) A Multicenter Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of a Thiazolidinedione or Placebo and of Vitamin D or Placebo In People With Type 2 Diabetes at Risk [NCT00879970]Phase 41,332 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Terminated(stopped due to FDA has placed the trial on full clinical hold.)
Effects of Treatment With Cyproterone Compound-spironolactone, Metformin and Pioglitazone on Serum Inflammatory Markers in Patients With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) [NCT02689843]Early Phase 190 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-01Completed
Pioglitazone Versus Rosiglitazone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Dyslipidemia [NCT00331487]Phase 3719 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-09-30Completed
Drug naïve Indigenous Australians With Type 2 Diabetes, Enrolled in a Randomised Controlled Trial of Rosiglitazone Versus Metformin Monotherapy to Assess the Effects on Metabolic and Cardiovascular Parameters [NCT00437970]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Unable to secure supply of the study medication)
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Dose-Ranging Study of Oral GW677954 as a Monotherapy for 12 Weeks Duration in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00196989]Phase 2448 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomised Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of NovoLog Mix 70/30 BID in Combination With Metformin and Pioglitazone to Metformin and Pioglitazone Alone in Insulin Naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00097279]Phase 3230 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
Insulin Sensitivity in the Peri-Wound Microcirculation of Pressure Ulcers in SCI [NCT02585765]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-01Withdrawn(stopped due to an alternate plan of investigation was developed.)
Effects of a Pioglitazone/Metformin Fixed Combination in Comparison to Metformin in Combination With Glimepiride on Diabetic Dyslipidemia [NCT00770653]Phase 3305 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Phase IIA Trial: Tretinoin and Pioglitazone HCL Combination Therapy in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis [NCT00919555]Phase 1/Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Multi Center, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Influence of Pioglitazone Treatment Over 6 Months on Metabolic Control in Type II Diabetic Patients Previously Treated With Insulin [NCT00576784]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Effect of Pioglitazone on Ambulatory Blood Pressure [NCT00328393]Phase 32 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
The Japan Working Group for the Assessment That the Pioglitazone Protects DM Patients Against Re-Infarction [NCT00212004]Phase 4630 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Limited budget to continue this study)
An Open-Label Drug-Drug Interaction Study to Assess the Effect of Abiraterone (JNJ-589485) on the Pharmacokinetics of Pioglitazone Following Administration of Abiraterone Acetate (JNJ-212082) and Pioglitazone HCl Tablets in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT01873001]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
An International, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of SYR-322 When Used in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01289119]Phase 3506 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
The Activation of Brown and Beige Fat and Role in Insulin Sensitivity [NCT02919176]Early Phase 139 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-01Completed
Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Pioglitazone and Preliminary Biomarker Response in Adolescents Aged 12 to 17 Years With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock [NCT01352182]Phase 1/Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy Between Lobeglitazone and Pioglitazone as Initial Triple Therapy With Metformin and Sitagliptin in Drug-naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT02315287]Phase 4190 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-09-30Recruiting
The Impact of Actos Treatment of Diabetes on Glucose Transporters in Muscle [NCT01799850]Phase 412 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
A Single Centre, Single Sequence, Open-Label, Repeat-Dose Study to Investigate the Effect of GSK1605786 on Hepatic Cytochrome P450, and BCRP and OATP1B1 Transport in Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT01489943]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-19Completed
Ketosis Prone Diabetes Mellitus in African-Americans: Insulin Signaling, Proteomics, and Outcomes [NCT00426413]44 participants (Anticipated)Observational2007-05-31Completed
Phase 4 Study of Pioglitazone on Neointima Volume and Inflammatory Markers in Diabetic Patients [NCT00494559]Phase 4240 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
Pilot Study of Imatinib Discontinuation in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia With Deep Molecular Response - Evaluation of Pioglitazone in Treatment-free Remission (EDI-PIO) [NCT02852486]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-22Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparator-Controlled Study of Pioglitazone HCl vs Glyburide in the Treatment of Patients With Type 2 (Non-Insulin-Dependent) Diabetes Mellitus and Mild Cardiac Disease (NYHA I) [NCT00521742]Phase 3300 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-03-31Completed
Influence of Pioglitazone for Renal Transplant Function in Diabetics - a Double Blind Randomised Placebo Controlled Cross Over Study [NCT00507494]Phase 30 participants Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Double-Blind, Multi-Centre, Active-Controlled (15, 30, and 45 mg Pioglitazone) Long-Term Extension Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Tesaglitazar (0.5 and 1 mg) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (GALLEX 6) [NCT00226330]Phase 31,100 participants Interventional2005-03-31Terminated(stopped due to The development program has been terminated)
Glucose Metabolism in South Asian Women With IGT or IFG. DIAbetes in South Asians - DIASA 3: A 12-week Intervention Trial With Oral Antidiabetic Medication to Improve Hepatic and Whole Body Insulin Sensitivity [NCT04662866]Phase 264 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-10Recruiting
Exercise and Pioglitazone for HIV-Metabolic Syndromes [NCT00639457]44 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Compare the Glycemic Effects, Safety, and Tolerability of Exenatide Long-Acting Release(Once Weekly) to Those of Sitagliptin and a Thiazolidinedione in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00637273]Phase 3514 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Pilot Trial of Pioglitazone in Adults Undergoing Surgical Resection of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00923949]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Study never published; terminated early due to low accrual.)
Effects of Oral Hypoglycemic Agents Combined With Short-term CSII on Glycemic Control in Newly-diagnosed Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT01471808]Phase 4336 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-10-31Enrolling by invitation
Effects of Pioglitazone and Glimepiride in Hypertensive Patients - Relationship With AGE, Inflammatory Cytokines and Cardiac Markers - [NCT01472497]Phase 416 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
A 24-week, Randomised, Parallel-Group, Multi-Centre, Open-Label Study of the Renal Effects of Tesaglitazar in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00229684]Phase 2100 participants Interventional2004-09-30Terminated(stopped due to The development program has been terminated)
Pioglitazone Therapy Targeting Fatigue in Breast Cancer [NCT05013255]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-23Recruiting
Effects of Insulin Sensitizers in Subjects With Impaired Glucose Tolerance [NCT00108615]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Effect of Pioglitazone on Intima Media Thickness, Endothelial Function, and Heart Rate Variability in Patients With Impaired Glucose Tolerance [NCT00306826]Phase 4120 participants InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to financial support withdrawn)
A Pilot Study of Treatment With Pegylated Interferon-Alpha2a, Ribavirin and Insulin Sensitizer Pioglitazone of Insulin Resistance (With the Exception of Diabetes) in Hepatitis C Virus Infection (The INSPIRED HCV Study) [NCT00433069]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled 26-week Dose-response Study of Rivoglitazone HCl (CS-011) With Active Comparator (Pioglitazone HCl) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00143520]Phase 2/Phase 3441 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
Pioglitazone Reverses Defects in Mitochondrial Biogenesis in Patients With T2DM [NCT00402012]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
"Can Growth Hormone's Lipolytic and Insulin-Antagonistic Effects be Modified by Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Gamma Agonists?" [NCT00459940]20 participants Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Effects of Pioglitazone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Heart Disease at High Risk for Vascular Complications : A Placebo-Controlled Study [NCT00479986]Phase 492 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Pioglitazone on Cardiac Function and Large Arteries (PICCOLA) [NCT00485056]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Extension to a Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Vildagliptin in Combination With Pioglitazone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00138554]Phase 3318 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
Relative Bioavailability of Both BI 10773 50 mg and Pioglitazone 45 mg After Co-administration Compared to BI 10773 and Pioglitazone Alone in Healthy Male Volunteers (an Open-label, Randomised, Crossover, Clinical Phase I Study) [NCT02276365]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
The KIN-FAST Trial (KIN001 For Accelerated Symptoms Termination) A 4-week Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Phase II Study Evaluating the Effects of Oral Pamapimod 150 mg With Pioglitazone 10 mg Daily on COVID-19 Evolution and Recovery in Non- [NCT05659459]Phase 2400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-25Suspended(stopped due to Sponsor has financial issues - trial currently on hold)
A Pilot Study Evaluating the Effect of Pioglitazone, Simvastatin, and Ibuprofen on Neutrophil Migration in Vivo in Healthy Subjects [NCT00531882]25 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Does Pioglitazone Increase the Production of Prostacyclin (PGI2) and/or 15-EPI-Lipoxin A4 in Humans With Diabetes Mellitus Type 2? [NCT01040819]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
An Open Label, Randomized, 2-Period, 2-Treatment, 2-Sequence, Crossover, Single-Dose Bioequivalence Study of Pioglitazone Hydrochloride Tablet 45mg [Test Formulation, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India] Versus Actos® (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride) Tablet 4 [NCT01797666]Phase 10 participants InterventionalCompleted
[NCT03030300]Phase 4170 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, and Comparative Clinical Trials to Compare the Effects of Pioglitazone and Evogliptin on Hepatic Fibrosis in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B With Significant Hepatic Fibrosis With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT05473806]Phase 428 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-18Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2A, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparator- and Placebo-Controlled, Multiple-Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Two Dose Levels of Mitoglitazone™ in Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT00760578]Phase 286 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Pioglitazone for Lung Cancer Chemoprevention [NCT00780234]Phase 292 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of WELCHOL as Add-on to Pioglitazone Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) [NCT00789750]Phase 3562 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Determination if Indirectly Reducing Circulating Insulin by Improving Insulin Sensitivity With Pioglitazone Reduces Renal Clearance of D-chiro-inositol (DCI) Increases the Circulating Concentration of DCI and Enhances Insulin-stimulated Release of the D-c [NCT00868140]51 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Lack of recruitment)
Effects of the PPAR-gamma Agonist Pioglitazone on Renal and Hormonal Responses to Salt in Diabetic and Hypertensive Subjects [NCT01090752]Phase 416 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Pioglitazone as a Candidate Chemoprevention Agent for Lung Cancer: A Pilot Trial Using a Pre-surgical Model in Early Stage NSCLC [NCT01342770]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Terminated
Myocardial Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) - Role of Intramyocellular Lipid Content and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Myocardial Insulin Resistance and Their Correction With Pioglitazone [NCT01588470]Phase 4130 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
The Effect of PPARgamma Stimulation on Glucose Metabolism, Insulin Resistance, Growth Hormone and Cortisol on Women Suffering From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome [NCT00145340]Phase 430 participants Interventional2002-09-30Completed
Effect of Pioglitazone on the Course of New Onset Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00545857]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Comparator-Controlled Study in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Comparing the Effects of Pioglitazone HCl Versus Glimepiride on the Rate of Progression of Atherosclerotic Disease as Measured by Carotid Intima-Media Thickn [NCT00225264]Phase 3458 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
A Portion-controlled Diet Will Prevent Weight Gain in Diabetics Treated With ACTOS [NCT00219440]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
Effects of Pioglitazone on Adiponectin and Inflammatory Markers in Overweight or Obese Hemodialysis Patients: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01301027]95 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Prospective Phase II, Randomized Multi-center Trial of a Combined Modularized Treatment With Metronomic Low-dose Treosulfan, Pioglitazone and Clarithromycin Versus Nivolumab in Patients With Squamous Cell Lung Cancer and Non- Squamous Cell Lung Cancer, [NCT02852083]Phase 286 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-01-31Recruiting
Effects of Thiazolidinediones on Human Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Differentiation Capacity:In Vitro and In Vivo- A Pilot Study [NCT00927355]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Prospective Study of Associations of Changes in HbA1C and Fasting Blood Lipids Due to Treatment With Pioglitazone for 6 Months and Genetic Polymorphism's in PPAR-gamma [NCT00449553]326 participants (Actual)Observational2001-06-30Completed
Comparison of Bare Metal Stent With Pioglitazone Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. [NCT00482183]Phase 2/Phase 338 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Comparator Controlled, Double-Blind Study of the Liver Safety of Pioglitazone HCl vs Glyburide With Metformin and Insulin as Part of Step Therapy in Subjects With Type 2 (Non-Insulin Dependent) Diabetes [NCT00494312]Phase 42,120 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparator-Controlled Study of Pioglitazone HCl vs Glyburide in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 (Non-Insulin Dependent) Diabetes Mellitus and Mild to Moderate Congestive Heart Failure [NCT00521820]Phase 3518 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Higher incidence of hospitalization for congestive heart failure in pioglitazone-treated subjects compared to glyburide treated subjects.)
Pioglitazone as an Aid During Buprenorphine Taper [NCT01517165]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-04Terminated
Comparison of the Effects of Metformin and Pioglitazone on Liver Enzymes [NCT05521633]Phase 396 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-06Completed
The Randomized Multiple Center Trial for The Effectiveness and Safety of Adding Compound Preparation of Pioglitazone and Metformin for Type 2 Diabetic Patients Who Have Bad Glycemic Control With the Initial Treatment of Sulfonylureas [NCT02099838]Phase 498 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
[NCT00395941]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) [NCT00000620]Phase 310,251 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-09-30Completed
Pioglitazone as an Adjunct to Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Cocaine Relapse Prevention [NCT04843046]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-23Recruiting
Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis With Pioglitazone [NCT00013598]Phase 230 participants Interventional2001-03-31Completed
A Clinical Trial to Prevent the Complications of Insulin Resistance (Including Type-2 Diabetes) [NCT00015626]Phase 2300 participants InterventionalCompleted
Exploratory Study to Investigate the Suppressive Effect of Oral Anti-Diabetic Drug (TZD) on Progression of Diabetic Nephropathy on [NCT00846716]400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-03-31Recruiting
[NCT00276497]Phase 10 participants Interventional2003-10-31Completed
Pioglitazone for the Treatment of Idiopathic Gastroparesis (PIOGAS Study) [NCT04300127]Early Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-24Active, not recruiting
A Multi-center, Randomized, Open-label, Active Controlled, Parallel Arm Study to Compare the Efficacy of 12 Weeks of Treatment With Vildagliptin 100 mg, qd to Thiazolidinedione (TZD) as add-on Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controll [NCT00396227]Phase 32,665 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
A Randomised Pilot Study to Compare the Effect of Pioglitazone and Metformin on Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00399204]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to lack of funding)
[NCT00212290]Phase 4140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor-gamma Agonists, Rheumatoid Arthritis and Cardiovascular Disease [NCT00554853]Phase 3143 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Treatment of Coronary Atherosclerosis and Calcification by Insulin Sensitizers in Insulin-Resistant Patients: Evaluated by EBCT, 16-Slice MDCT Coronary Angiography/Scanning, and Intravascular Ultrasound [NCT00155350]Phase 4120 participants Interventional2004-11-30Recruiting
Evolution of Abdominal Adipose Tissue Distribution in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Treated During 6 Months With Pioglitazone or Insulin, in Association With Metformin or Sulfonylurea. [NCT00159211]28 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Terminated(stopped due to inclusion was finished)
Mechanisms of Sympathetic Overactivity in the Metabolic Syndrome: Effects of Reversing Insulin Resistance by Drug Treatment [NCT00408850]Phase 344 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-11-30Recruiting
Pioglitazone in Hepatitis C: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Study [NCT00189163]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Role of Pioglitazone in the Treatment of Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) [NCT00227110]Phase 455 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
Does Chronic Thiazolidinedione Therapy Improve Endothelial Function and Preserve Renal Function in Non-Diabetic Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease? [NCT00586261]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Low enrollment because of the specifics of the inclusion criteria)
Pioglitazone for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder Comorbid With Metabolic Syndrome [NCT00671515]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Phase 1B, Single Center, Randomized, Open Label, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of a Single NGM313 Dose or Daily Oral Pioglitazone in Obese Participants With Insulin Resistance and Incre [NCT03298464]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-11Completed
Bioequivalence of a Fixed Dose Combination Tablet of Linagliptin 5 mg / Pioglitazone 30 mg Compared With Its Mono-components in Healthy Male and Female Subjects (an Open-label, Randomised, Single-dose, Replicate Design Study With Two Treatments in Four Cr [NCT01276327]Phase 164 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Response To Oral Agents in Diabetes (ROAD)- Pilot Study [NCT00780715]Phase 429 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
The Use of Incretin-based Drugs and the Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT02475499]886,172 participants (Actual)Observational2014-03-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Pioglitazone for Patients With Cancer of the Pancreas [NCT01838317]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
A Phase II, Randomised, Multi-centric, Multi-national Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of a Fixed Dose Combination of Spironolactone, Pioglitazone & Metformin (SPIOMET) for Adolescent Girls and Young Adult Women (AYAs) Wit [NCT05394142]Phase 2364 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-24Recruiting
A Phase 4, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AD-4833 When Orally Administered Once Daily as add-on to SYR-322 Versus SYR-322 Alone in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus W [NCT01686711]Phase 4207 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Four Second Line Pharmacological Strategies in Type 2 Diabetes Study [NCT05220917]781,430 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-08-01Active, not recruiting
A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of Pioglitazone in Early Parkinson's Disease [NCT01280123]Phase 2210 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
An Exploratory MRI Study in Type 2 Diabetic Subjects: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Measurement of Fluid Volumes by MRI in the Lower Extremities of Subjects Receiving Pioglitazone [NCT00269061]Phase 132 participants Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Clinical Trial of Pioglitazone for Prevention of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy After Heart Transplantation [NCT01186250]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
Pathogenesis of Uric Acid Nephrolithiasis: Role of Pioglitazone/Weight Loss [NCT04370093]Phase 454 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-17Recruiting
Pilot Test of ACTOS in Multiple Sclerosis: Safety and Tolerability [NCT00242177]Phase 130 participants Interventional2003-10-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of CS-917 as Monotherapy for Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00290940]Phase 2400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Effects of Elevated Free Fatty Acids on Endogenous Glucose Production in People With and Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00308373]73 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
Dose-Finding, Efficacy, and Safety of AZ 242 (Tesaglitazar) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00280865]Phase 2500 participants Interventional2002-04-30Completed
[NCT00419484]1,000 participants Observational2004-03-31Completed
The Effect of Pioglitazone and Rosiglitazone on Atherosclerotic and Inflammatory Markers in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Crossover Trial [NCT00314561]Phase 440 participants Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Effects of Pioglitazone on Exogenous Carbohydrate Oxidation During Steady-State Exercise at High Altitude [NCT06164665]Phase 49 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-03-01Completed
A 26-Week Randomized, Open-label, Active Controlled, Parallel-group, Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of the Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on GLP-1 Receptor Agonist and [NCT02787551]Phase 3514 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-06Completed
Assessing the Impact of Pioglitazone on Skin Barrier Function in Atopic Dermatitis Patients [NCT01695707]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Insufficient Funding.)
A Phase 1, Multiple-Dose, Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Study in Healthy Subjects to Assess the Effect of Pioglitazone (PGZ) on the Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Cenicriviroc Mesylate (CVC) and the Effect of CVC on the PK of PGZ [NCT02342067]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
An Open Label, Randomised, 2-Period, 2-Treatment, 2-Sequence, Crossover, Single-Dose Bioequivalence Study of FDC of Pioglitazone Hydrochloride and Metformin Hydrochloride Tablets 15 mg/850 mg (Test Formulation, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India) Versus [NCT01800227]Phase 10 participants InterventionalCompleted
An Open Label, Randomised, 2-Period, 2-Treatment, 2-Sequence, Crossover, Single-Dose Bioequivalence Study of FDC of Pioglitazone Hydrochloride and Metformin Hydrochloride Tablets 15 mg/850 mg (Test Formulation, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India) Versus [NCT01800240]Phase 10 participants InterventionalCompleted
Mediators of Abnormal Reproductive Function in Obesity [NCT01817400]Early Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Effects of Pioglitazone on Visceral Fat Metabolic Activity [NCT01819402]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-03-31Recruiting
Insulin Resistance Following Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Men With Prostate Cancer [NCT04658849]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-02Withdrawn(stopped due to End of grant funding)
Interfacing Adiposity, Sleep Apnea, and Insulin Resistance [NCT02192684]45 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
PPARγ Agonist Treatment for Cocaine Dependence [NCT02774343]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Role of Proinflammatory Signaling in Alcohol Craving [NCT01631630]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Terminated(stopped due to The study was closed to recruitment due to feasibility problems.)
Cohort Study of Pioglitazone and Bladder Cancer in Patients With Diabetes [NCT01637935]193,099 participants (Actual)Observational2004-07-31Completed
Phase 2 Study of Pioglitazone in Thyroid Cancers That Contain the PAX8-PPARgamma Fusion Gene [NCT01655719]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
Comparing the Effects of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to Pioglitazone in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Failing Maximal Doses of Metformin Plus a Sulfonylurea [NCT02303405]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Investigator decision)
Prevention of Coronary Artery in STENT Restenosis With the Combined Use of Pioglitazone and Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent [NCT00376870]Phase 3160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-07-31Recruiting
Cohort Study of Pioglitazone and Cancer Incidence in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus [NCT02958956]236,507 participants (Actual)Observational1997-01-01Completed
The Effect of Obesity-induced Cytokine Elevation on the Molecular Regulation of Protein Turnover and Carbohydrate Metabolism in Human Skeletal Muscle [NCT02305069]26 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
DPP-4 Inhibition and Thiazolidinedione for Diabetes Mellitus Prevention (DInT DM Study) [NCT01006018]3 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Unanticipated delays due to sterilization/stabilization testing of GLP-1.)
Comparison of Exenatide, Insulin or Pioglitazone on Glycaemic Control and β-cell Function in Drug-naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Multicentre Randomized Parallel-group Trial [NCT01147627]416 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Study of Pioglitazone Hydrochloride in Severe, Refractory Asthma [NCT00994175]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-23Completed
Effects of Pioglitazone on Reverse Cholesterol Transport and HDL Function in Persons With Diabetes [NCT01156597]Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparator- and Placebo-Controlled, Multiple-Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Three Dose Levels of MSCD-0602 in Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT01280695]Phase 2129 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
The Contribution of Inflammation and Insulin Resistance to Intermittent Claudication [NCT00153166]Phase 2/Phase 376 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Effect of Exenatide Treatment on Hepatic Fat Content and Plasma Adipocytokine Levels in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT01432405]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Therapeutic Effects of Canagliflozin on the Liver Inflammation Damage and Lipoprotein Metabolism in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Combined With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease [NCT05422092]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-20Not yet recruiting
Targeting ADMA With Pioglitazone to Reduce Sympathetic Overactivity in CKD Patients [NCT03471117]Phase 428 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-04-01Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 24-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of INT131 Besylate Compared to Pioglitazone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00631007]Phase 2367 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
A Phase 1, Multiple-Dose, Single-Blind Parallel Design, Single-Center, Dose-Ranging Study to Assess the Effects of Daily Administration of Pioglitazone for 14 Days on the Brain Hemodynamics of Healthy Elderly Subjects [NCT01456117]Phase 161 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone 15mg or Pioglitazone 30mg Add-on in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled With Metformin and Dapaglif [NCT04885712]Phase 3378 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-28Completed
Comparison of Anti-inflammatory Status Linked to Atherosclerosis Formation/Progression Among Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Patients Under Combined Pharmacological Therapy [NCT04392557]Phase 436 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Recruiting
Effects on Glycemic Variability and Glyco-metabolic Control of Metformin, Pioglitazone and Sitagliptin in Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT01895569]Phase 464 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-06-30Recruiting
A One-year Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Impact of Pioglitazone Versus Linagliptin on Bone Turnover Markers [NCT02429232]Phase 4160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-31Not yet recruiting
Actos Now for Prevention of Diabetes (ACT NOW) [NCT00220961]Phase 3602 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Preservation of Beta-cell Function in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00232583]58 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
Potential Utility of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor Gamma Agonists in the Eradication of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells: Myth or Truth? [NCT04883125]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-01Completed
Effects of Pioglitazone Combined With Metformin and Metformin on Gonadal and Metabolic Profiles in Chinese Nonobese PCOS Patients With Hyperandrogenemia. [NCT05519813]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-01Active, not recruiting
Therapeutic Effects of Canagliflozin on the Liver Inflammation Damage and Lipoprotein Metabolism in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Combined With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease [NCT05513729]80 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2022-08-18Recruiting
A Phase II Study on Trabectedin in Combination With PPARg Agonist Pioglitazone in Patients With Round Cell Myxoid Liposarcomas or Dedifferentiated G1 and G2 Liposarcomas With Stable Disease After a Monotherapy With Trabectedin. (TRABEPIO) [NCT04794127]Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-02Recruiting
Effects of 150 mcg Aleglitazar on Renal Function in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Renal Impairment, as Compared to Actos® [NCT01043029]Phase 2302 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Effects of Pioglitazone, a PPARγ Agonist, on the Abuse Liability of Heroin and of Nicotine [NCT01395797]Phase 1/Phase 282 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Terminated(stopped due to The funding period ended.)
A Multicenter Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Pioglitazone to Promote Renal Tolerance in ANCA-associated Vasculitis - RENATO [NCT05946564]Phase 3126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase 3 Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of AD-4833-536 in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00376181]Phase 396 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Combination formulation concerns)
Effects of Glimepiride Monotherapy Versus Combined Neteglinide-Pioglitazone Therapy on Insulin Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT01570660]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-02-28Completed
Comparing Effects of Metformin and Pioglitazone on Regulation of Serum Adipokines in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Patients [NCT01593371]98 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
Ghrelin Regulation and Structure: Effect of Thiazolidinedione Therapy on Ghrelin [NCT00843791]6 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient funds to continue.)
Use of Low Dose Pioglitazone to Treat Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney [NCT02697617]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-26Completed
A Prospective Phase I and Consecutive Phase II, Two-arm, Randomized Multi-center Trial of Temsirolimus in Combination With Pioglitazone, Etoricoxib and Metronomic Low-dose Trofosfamide Versus Dacarbazine (DTIC) in Patients With Advanced Melanoma [NCT01614301]Phase 1/Phase 2136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-05-31Recruiting
Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Possible Beneficial Effect of Empagliflozin Versus Pioglitazone on Non-diabetic Patients With Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis [NCT05605158]Phase 356 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-30Not yet recruiting
An Open-Label Pilot Study of Pioglitazone in Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis [NCT03440034]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-22Completed
Effects of GH and Pioglitazone in Viscerally Obese Adults With IGT [NCT00352287]Phase 460 participants Interventional2003-03-31Completed
Efficacy, Durability, Safety, and Tolerability of Sitagliptin vs. Pioglitazone as add-on Treatments in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Uncontrolled on the Full-dose Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea: a 52-week, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group, Phase 3 Clin [NCT03125694]Phase 3250 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-01Completed
Effects of Pioglitazone on Stress Reactivity and Alcohol Craving [NCT05107765]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-12Recruiting
The Role of PPAR-Gamma Agonists in Immunomodulation and Vascular Prevention in SLE (PPAR-SLE) [NCT02338999]Phase 1/Phase 288 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-18Completed
Sonias Combination Tablets LD Special Drug Use Surveillance Survey in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Respond Poorly to Pioglitazone [NCT02098746]294 participants (Actual)Observational2011-06-30Completed
Synergistic Induction of UCP-1 by Ephedrine/Caffeine and Pioglitazone: A Rationale for Combination Therapy of Obesity [NCT00377975]Phase 296 participants Interventional2003-01-31Completed
Effects of Pioglitazone on Stress Reactivity and Alcohol Craving (Pilot) [NCT03860753]Phase 1/Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-01Terminated(stopped due to Halted enrollment due to COVID-19)
Metabolic Abnormalities in HIV-infected Persons [NCT01612858]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Evaluation of the Effect of Atorvastatin and Pioglitazone in Carotid Atherosclerosis With the Use of 18Fluoride-Fludeoxyglucose(FDG) Positron Emission Tomography-computed Tomography (PET-CT)Imaging [NCT01341730]Phase 441 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Terminated
Combined Letrozole-metformin-pioglitazone Versus Combined Clomiphene Citrate-metformin-pioglitazone in Clomiphene Citrate-resistant Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome [NCT01909141]Early Phase 1100 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
Role of Pioglitazone Therapy in Management of Insulin Resistance Associated With Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) in Patients With Prostate Cancer [NCT05098327]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-01Withdrawn(stopped due to no participant enrolled due to lack of interest.)
Combination Therapy With Pioglitazone and Losartan Provides Additional Renoprotection in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy [NCT00364988]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Metabolic Effects of Thiazolidinediones in Chronic Kidney Disease [NCT00368017]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Terminated(stopped due to unable to replace Fellow conducting the study who left institution in 2007)
An Open-label, Randomized, Active-controlled Study to Compare the Effect of 16 Weeks Treatment With Vildagliptin to Pioglitazone as add-on Therapy to Metformin in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Monotherapy [NCT01882907]Phase 4287 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
Effects of Metformin and Combination of Metformin and Pioglitazone on Plasma Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-8 Levels in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome [NCT03117517]Early Phase 1106 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-20Completed
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Acquired Lipodystrophy (HAL) Classification, Measurement, & Fat Response to a Thiazolidinedione (TZD) Challenge in Differing Adult Phenotypic Presentations [NCT01023620]4 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Which Oral Combination of Anti-diabetes Medication May Work Better in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: a Randomized Control Trial [NCT04976283]Phase 4123 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-15Recruiting
Pioglitazone-Metformin Combination Treatment for High Risk Oral Preneoplasia [NCT05727761]Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-31Not yet recruiting
Effect of Metformin, Dapagliflozin, Fixed Combination of Metformin and Pioglitazone in Overweighted Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes [NCT05591235]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-30Not yet recruiting
Letrozole-metformin Versus Letrozole-metformin-pioglitazone in PCO Clomiphene Citrate Resistant Women [NCT02341703]Early Phase 1100 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Completed
"Actos Tablets Special Drug Use Surveillance Combined Use of Biguanides / Long-term Treatment" [NCT02003014]899 participants (Actual)Observational2009-02-28Completed
Targeting Beta-cell Failure in Lean Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT04657939]Phase 457 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-01Completed
An Open Label, Randomized, Two Part Study to Evaluate the CYP2C8- and OATP1B1-Mediated Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of GSK1278863 With Pioglitazone and Rosuvastatin as Victims and Trimethoprim as Perpetrator in Healthy Adult Volunteers [NCT02371603]Phase 170 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-11Completed
Insulin Resistance in Men With Prostate Cancer on Androgen Deprivation Therapy [NCT04995978]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-01Withdrawn(stopped due to No participants were recruited and the study was deemed not feasible)
Mechanisms Underlying Metabolic Syndrome in Obesity [NCT00579813]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
An Exploratory Study to Evaluate Changes in Hepatic Fat Following Multiple-Dose Administration of MK-4074 and Pioglitazone Hydrochloride [NCT01431521]Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-26Completed
A Phase 3b, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone HCl and Metformin HCl Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy Compared to Pioglitazone HCl Monotherapy and to Metformin HCl Monotherapy in the Treatment of Subjects Wit [NCT00727857]Phase 3600 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
A Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Simultaneously Qualify a Biomarker Algorithm for Prognosis of Risk of Developing Mild Cognitive Impairment Due to Alzheimer's Disease (MCI Due to AD) and to Test the Safety and Effica [NCT01931566]Phase 33,494 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-01Terminated(stopped due to Lack of efficacy of the drug; no safety concern)
Optimizing Body Composition for Function in Older Adults (OPTIMA) - A Pepper Pilot Study [NCT00315146]Phase 488 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Phase 2B, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparator- & Placebo-Controlled, Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability & Efficacy of 3 Dose Levels of Mitoglitazone in Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT01103414]Phase 2356 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Effects of Pioglitazone, a PPARgamma Receptor Agonist, on the Abuse Liability of Oxycodone [NCT01395784]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Modulation of Insulin Secretion and Insulin Sensitivity in Bangladeshi Type 2 Diabetic Subjects by an Insulin Sensitizer Pioglitazone and T2DM Association With PPARG Gene Polymorphism. [NCT01589445]Phase 477 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study of Pioglitazone for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Asthma in Obese Asthmatics [NCT00634036]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Long-Term Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis With Pioglitazone [NCT00062764]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Clinical Research Network in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: Pioglitazone vs. Vitamin E vs. Placebo for the Treatment of Non-Diabetic Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (PIVENS) [NCT00063622]Phase 3247 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Two-arm, Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Effect of Add-on Pioglitazone or Dapagliflozin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled by Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor and Metformin Therapy [NCT03499704]Phase 4133 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-11Active, not recruiting
Chemoprevention of Squamous Cell Cancer of the Skin in High Risk Patients [NCT02347813]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
A Combination of Insulin Sensitizer and Leptin as Treatment for the HAART -Induced Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial [NCT00362440]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Pioglitazone for Bipolar Depression [NCT01717040]Phase 437 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Terminated(stopped due to The study ended early due to budgetary issues)
Effect of Pioglitazone on Pancreatic Steatosis and Bone Health [NCT00855010]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Drug-drug Interaction Study to Evaluate the Effect of Multiple Doses of JNJ-56021927 on the Pharmacokinetics of Multiple Cytochrome P450 and Transporter Substrates in Subjects With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT02592317]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-12Completed
Pioglitazone Treatment for Insulin Resistant Patients With Mood Disorders [NCT01559857]Phase 437 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
An Open Label, Randomized, 2-Period, 2-Treatment, 2-Sequence, Crossover, Single-Dose Bioequivalence Study of Pioglitazone Hydrochloride Tablet 45mg [Test Formulation, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India] Versus Actos® (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride) Tablet 4 [NCT01798940]Phase 10 participants InterventionalCompleted
The Effect of Bosentan and Pioglitazone on Insulin Resistance in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [NCT00825266]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Terminated(stopped due to difficulty in finding eligible subjects)
"Actos Tablets Special Drug Use Surveillance Metabolic Syndrome in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus" [NCT02002975]18,223 participants (Actual)Observational2007-10-16Completed
A 24-Week, Open Label, Phase IV Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Pioglitazone 30 mg in Patients With Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Stable Triple Oral Therapy of Metformin, Sulfonylurea, and Pioglitazone 15 Mg (ADD Trial) [NCT01972724]Phase 4114 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-16Completed
A Phase 3, Open Label, Randomized, Parallel, 26 Week Treatment Study Comparing LY2605541 With Insulin Glargine as Basal Insulin Treatment in Combination With Oral Anti Hyperglycemia Medications in Asian Insulin Naïve Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT01894568]Phase 3388 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Cellular Dynamics of Subcutaneous Fat Distribution in Obese Women [NCT01748994]63 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Three-arm Parallel Group Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Alogliptin and Pioglitazone Combination Therapy on Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes Subjects Who Have Inadequate Control With Metformin Monotherapy [NCT02231021]Phase 4216 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
A Blinded Long-term Extension Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Pioglitazone (AD-4833 Sustained Release 0.8 mg Daily) to Slow the Progression of Cognitive Decline in Subjects Who Have Completed the AD-4833/TOMM40_301 Study With Diagnosis of Mil [NCT02284906]Phase 340 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-12Terminated(stopped due to Lack of efficacy of the drug; no safety concern)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CCX140-B in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT01028963]Phase 2159 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
An Individualized treatMent aPproach for oldER patIents: A Randomized, Controlled stUdy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (IMPERIUM) [NCT02072096]Phase 4192 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Terminated(stopped due to The trial was terminated per protocol because of lack of feasibility.)
"Actos Tablets Special Drug Use Surveillance Combined Use of Insulin Products / Long-term Treatment" [NCT02068508]1,067 participants (Actual)Observational2009-07-30Completed
Metact® Combination Tablets Special Drug Use Surveillance Survey on Long-term Use for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT02024971]1,103 participants (Actual)Observational2010-07-31Completed
Pioglitazone/Glimepiride (Sonias) Combination Tablets Special Drug Use Surveillance Survey on Long-term Use for in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT02098733]1,168 participants (Actual)Observational2011-06-30Completed
A PHASE 1, OPEN-LABEL, CROSS-OVER, FIXED SEQUENCE STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFECT OF MULTIPLE DOSES OF DS-1971A ON THE SINGLE DOSE PHARMACOKINETICS OF PROBE SUBSTRATES FOR CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 AND CYP3A4 ENZYMES IN HEALTHY MALE AND FEMALE SUBJECTS [NCT02473627]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
A Phase IIa Cancer Prevention Trial of the PPAR Gamma Agonist Pioglitazone in Oral Leukoplakia [NCT00099021]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Impacts of Sequential Treatment Using Fixed Dose Pioglitazone/Metformin Combination Following Short-term Intensive Insulin Treatment on Long-term Blood Glucose Control and β-Cell Function in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes [NCT03196362]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-12-01Recruiting
A Phase IV, Open Label, Randomized Trial on the Effect of Metformin Plus Lantus Insulin, Pioglitazone, or DPP4 Inhibitor on Fatty Liver in Patients With Type II Diabetes [NCT02365233]Phase 45 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-01Terminated(stopped due to IRB withheld the data due to inadequate supporting documentation)
"A Randomized, Open-label, Single Dose, Two-way Crossover Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and the Safety After Administration of BR3003 and Co-administration of BR3003B and BR3003C in Healthy Volunteers." [NCT05411965]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-04-28Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Multi-Center Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Effect of Roflumilast Plus Pioglitazone on Liver Enzymes and Liver Fat Content in Subjects With Nonalcoholic SteatoHepatitis [NCT01703260]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Company decision; No safety or efficacy concerns (see detailed description))
Actos Tablets Specified Drug-use Survey [NCT02181842]246 participants (Actual)Observational2009-01-26Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]First Occurrence of MCE or Revascularization or Hospitalization for Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) in Lipid Trial.
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]First Occurrence of Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE) in the Blood Pressure Trial.
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]First Occurrence of Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE) in the Lipid Trial.
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]Stroke in the Blood Pressure Trial.
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]Death From Any Cause in the Glycemia Trial.
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]First Occurrence of a Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE); Specifically Nonfatal Heart Attack, Nonfatal Stroke, or Cardiovascular Death (Measured Throughout the Study) in the Glycemia Trial.
NCT00062764 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Improvement in Liver Histology
NCT00062764 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Impaired Glucose Tolerance After Treatment
NCT00062764 (5) [back to overview]Mean Increase of Insulin Sensitivity Index
NCT00062764 (5) [back to overview]Mean BMI Change
NCT00062764 (5) [back to overview]Average Increase in Weight After Treatment
NCT00063622 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis
NCT00063622 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Resolution of Definite Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
NCT00063622 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improvement in Steatosis
NCT00063622 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improvement in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Defined by Change in Standardized Scoring of Liver Biopsies at Baseline and After 96 Weeks of Treatment.
NCT00063622 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improvement in Lobular Inflammation
NCT00063622 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improvement in Hepatocellular Ballooning
NCT00086502 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FPG (Fasting Plasma Glucose) at Week 24
NCT00086502 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Hemoglobin A1C) at Week 24
NCT00086515 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) at Week 24
NCT00086515 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24
NCT00086515 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2-hour Post-meal Glucose (PMG) at Week 24
NCT00091949 (7) [back to overview]Composite Outcome of Fatal or Non-fatal Stroke, Fatal or Non-fatal MI or Episode of Serious Congestive Heart Failure
NCT00091949 (7) [back to overview]Acute Coronary Syndrome
NCT00091949 (7) [back to overview]All Cause Mortality
NCT00091949 (7) [back to overview]Recurrent Fatal or Non-fatal Stroke, or Fatal or Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction
NCT00091949 (7) [back to overview]Fatal or Non-fatal Stroke Alone
NCT00091949 (7) [back to overview]Development of Overt Diabetes
NCT00091949 (7) [back to overview]Decline in Cognitive Status
NCT00094757 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 54
NCT00094757 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 18
NCT00094757 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 18
NCT00094757 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 54
NCT00099021 (3) [back to overview]Patients' Overall Response
NCT00099021 (3) [back to overview]Patients' Histological (Tissue) Response
NCT00099021 (3) [back to overview]Patients' Clinical Response
NCT00106704 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 24
NCT00106704 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 24
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Therapeutic Glycemic Response (A1C < 7.0%) at Week 24
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Confirmed Hypoglycemia During the ST + LT Treatment Period
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]All Reported Hypoglycemic Adverse Events During the ST + LT Treatment Period
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Neutrophil Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Lymphocyte Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Eosinophil Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Basophil Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Baseline and Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) at Week 24
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Baseline and Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Hematocrit During the ST + LT Period
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Baseline and Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC)
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Electrocardiogram (ECG) Tracings - Shift Table From Baseline (BL) to Selected Visits During ST + LT Treatment Period
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure During the ST + LT Period
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Heart Rate During the ST + LT Period
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Monocyte Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Baseline and Changes From Baseline in White Blood Cell Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Counts (x 10^6 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Hemoglobin During the ST + LT Period
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure During the ST + LT Period
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Platelet Counts (x 10^9 c/L) During the ST + LT Period
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Overall Summary of Adverse Events During ST+LT Treatment Period
NCT00121667 (22) [back to overview]Marked Laboratory Abnormalities - During ST + LT Treatment Period
NCT00153166 (2) [back to overview]Lower Extremity Skeletal Muscle Glucose Uptake
NCT00153166 (2) [back to overview]'M' = Whole Body Insulin Sensitivity
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 3: Insulin Sensitivity Index (SI) From Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test [After 3 Nights of SWS Suppression]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 3: Insulin Sensitivity Index (SI) From Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test [Baseline]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 2: Acute Insulin Resistance to Intravenous Glucose (AIRg) [After CPAP]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 2: Acute Insulin Resistance to Intravenous Glucose (AIRg) [Baseline]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 2: Insulin Sensitivity Index (SI) From Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test [After CPAP]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 2: Insulin Sensitivity Index (SI) From Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test [Baseline]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 2: Mean Cortisol Levels Over 24 Hours, Per Patient [After Treatment]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 2: Mean Cortisol Levels Over 24 Hours, Per Patient [Baseline]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 2: Mean Leptin Levels Over 24 Hours, Per Patient [After Treatment]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 2: Mean Leptin Levels Over 24 Hours, Per Patient [Baseline]
NCT00220961 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Plasma Insulin Concentration During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
NCT00220961 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose of 2.4 Years
NCT00220961 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Matsuda Index of Insulin Sensitivity (There Are no Minimum/Maximum Values)
NCT00220961 (5) [back to overview]Change in Atherosclerosis
NCT00220961 (5) [back to overview]Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00225277 (6) [back to overview]Nominal Change From Baseline in Normalized Total Atheroma Volume
NCT00225277 (6) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Experiencing Any of the Composite Endpoint C Cardiovascular Events
NCT00225277 (6) [back to overview]Number of Cardiovascular Events as Adjudicated by the Clinical Endpoint Committee
NCT00225277 (6) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Experiencing Any of the Composite Endpoint B Cardiovascular Events
NCT00225277 (6) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Experiencing Any of the Composite Endpoint A Cardiovascular Events
NCT00225277 (6) [back to overview]Nominal Change From Baseline in Percent Atheroma Volume
NCT00231894 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Glucose at 3 Months (3 Months-baseline) US Sample
NCT00231894 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum HDL at 3 Months (3 Months-baseline) China Site
NCT00231894 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum HDL at 3 Months (3 Months-baseline) US Sample
NCT00231894 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Triglycerides at 3 Months ( 3 Months-baseline) US Sample
NCT00231894 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Triglycerides at 3 Months (3 Months-baseline) China Sample
NCT00231894 (9) [back to overview]Change in RBANS List Recognition Scores at 3 Months (3 Months-baseline) US Sample
NCT00231894 (9) [back to overview]2 Hour Glucose From Glucose Tolerance Test US Sample
NCT00231894 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Glucose at 3 Months ( 3 Months -Baseline) China Sample
NCT00231894 (9) [back to overview]2 Hour Glucose From Glucose Tolerance Test China Sample
NCT00232583 (17) [back to overview]Weight
NCT00232583 (17) [back to overview]Inflammatory Markers -Fibrinogen
NCT00232583 (17) [back to overview]Inflammatory Markers - PAI-1
NCT00232583 (17) [back to overview]Inflammatory Markers - hsCRP
NCT00232583 (17) [back to overview]Beta-cell Function - C-peptide AUC (Area Under the Curve)
NCT00232583 (17) [back to overview]Bet-cell Function Measured by Disposition Index
NCT00232583 (17) [back to overview]Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Hypoglycemia Fear
NCT00232583 (17) [back to overview]Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Lifestyle Flexibility
NCT00232583 (17) [back to overview]Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Satisfaction With Insulin Treatment
NCT00232583 (17) [back to overview]Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Social or Vocational Worry
NCT00232583 (17) [back to overview]Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Social Stigma
NCT00232583 (17) [back to overview]Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Treatment Impact
NCT00232583 (17) [back to overview]Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Treatment Satisfaction
NCT00232583 (17) [back to overview]Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Willingness to Continue Insulin Treatment
NCT00232583 (17) [back to overview]Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Current Health Perception
NCT00232583 (17) [back to overview]Insulin Sensitivity as Measure be Matsuda Index
NCT00232583 (17) [back to overview]Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Glycemia Control Perception
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26.
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin (Week 8).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin (Week 16).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin (Week 20).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin (Week 4).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin (Week 26).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Decrease From Baseline ≥ 2.0%.
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia (Fasting Plasma Glucose ≥ 200 mg Per dL).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 12).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio (Week 26).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight (Week 20).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight (Week 26).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight (Week 8).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in C-peptide (Week 12).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in C-peptide (Week 16).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in C-peptide (Week 20).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in C-peptide (Week 26).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in C-peptide (Week 4).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in C-peptide (Week 8).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 1).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio (Week 12).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 16).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 20).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 4).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 8).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Insulin (Week 12).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Insulin (Week 16).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Insulin (Week 20).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Insulin (Week 26).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Insulin (Week 4).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Insulin (Week 8).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 12).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio (Week 16).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio (Week 20).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio (Week 4).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio (Week 8).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Number of Participants Requiring Rescue.
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 6.5%.
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7.0%.
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7.5%.
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Decrease From Baseline ≥ 0.5%.
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Decrease From Baseline ≥ 1.0%.
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Decrease From Baseline ≥ 1.5%.
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 16).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 2).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 20).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 26).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 4).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 8).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight (Week 12).
NCT00286494 (51) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin (Week 12).
NCT00295633 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving A1c <7% at Week 24
NCT00295633 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) at Week 24
NCT00295633 (4) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC) Response to an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) at Week 24
NCT00295633 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24
NCT00300365 (1) [back to overview]Mean Increase in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Baseline and 12 Weeks
NCT00315146 (2) [back to overview]Lean Body Mass
NCT00315146 (2) [back to overview]Appendicular Non-bone Lean Mass
NCT00322868 (8) [back to overview]Sputum TNFα
NCT00322868 (8) [back to overview]Sputum White Cell Count
NCT00322868 (8) [back to overview]Sputum Neutrophil Percent
NCT00322868 (8) [back to overview]Sputum Neutrophil Count
NCT00322868 (8) [back to overview]Sputum IL-8
NCT00322868 (8) [back to overview]Sputum IL-6
NCT00322868 (8) [back to overview]Sputum IL-1ß
NCT00322868 (8) [back to overview]Sputum Active Elastase
NCT00327015 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving A1C ≤6.5% at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy
NCT00327015 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue or Discontinuation at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy
NCT00327015 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue or Discontinuation at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy
NCT00327015 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy
NCT00327015 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy
NCT00327015 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy
NCT00327015 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy
NCT00327015 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving A1C ≤6.5% at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy
NCT00327015 (12) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC) Response to an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy
NCT00327015 (12) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC) Response to an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy
NCT00327015 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving A1C < 7% at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy
NCT00327015 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving A1C < 7% at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 0.5%
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Meeting Rescue Criteria (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Meeting Rescue Criteria
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Triglyceride Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Total Cholesterol Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Insulin Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in HbA1c
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fasting Proinsulin
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in C-peptide Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Body Weight
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Triglyceride Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Cholesterol Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Insulin Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 4 in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 4 in HbA1c
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fasting Proinsulin
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 4 in C-peptide Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in VLDL / Chylomicron Triglycerides
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Triglyceride Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Total Cholesterol Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in NMR Lipid Fractionation Total Triglycerides
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean VLDL Particle Size
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean LDL Particle Size
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein A1
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Apolipoprotein C-III
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein A2
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 1 in Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Adiponectin
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in VLDL Particles
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in VLDL / Chylomicron Particles
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in LDL Particles
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in HDL Particles
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in VLDL Particles
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in VLDL / Chylomicron Particles
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in LDL Particles
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in HDL Particles
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in VLDL Particles Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in VLDL / Chylomicron Triglycerides Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) / Chylomicron Particles Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Triglycerides Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Lipid Fractionation Total Triglycerides Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean VLDL Particle Size Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean LDL Particle Size Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean HDL Particle Size Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Particles Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Intermediate Density Lipoprotein (IDL) Particles Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Insulin Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Homeostatic Model Assessment Beta Cell Function (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Particles Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Free Fatty Acids Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Calculated Homeostatic Model Assessment Insulin Resistance (HOMA IR) (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in C-peptide Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A2 Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Adiponectin Over Time (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7%
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7.5% (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7.5%
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean HDL Particle Size
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Insulin Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in IDL Particles
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7.0% (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 6.5% (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 6.5%
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 2%
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 2.0% (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 1% (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 1%
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 1.5% (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 1.5%
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 0.5% (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in HbA1c
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (Grouped Analysis)
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Free Fatty Acids
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Fasting Proinsulin
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Calculated HOMA Insulin Resistance
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Calculated HOMA Beta-cell Function
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in C-peptide Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Body Weight
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Apolipoprotein B
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Apolipoprotein A2
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Apolipoprotein A1
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Adiponectin
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Triglyceride Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Total Cholesterol Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Insulin Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 20 in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 20 in HbA1c
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Fasting Proinsulin
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 20 in C-peptide Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Body Weight
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Triglyceride Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Total Cholesterol Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Insulin Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 16 in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 16 in HbA1c
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Fasting Proinsulin
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 16 in C-peptide Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in VLDL / Chylomicron Triglycerides
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Triglyceride Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in NMR Lipid Fractionation Total Triglycerides
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean VLDL Particle Size
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean LDL Particle Size
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean HDL Particle Size
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Insulin Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in IDL Particles
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in HbA1c
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Free Fatty Acids
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Proinsulin
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Calculated HOMA Insulin Resistance
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Calculated HOMA Beta-cell Function
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in C-peptide Levels
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Body Weight
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein C-III
NCT00328627 (156) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein B
NCT00362440 (3) [back to overview]Cholesterol Levels
NCT00362440 (3) [back to overview]Body Composition (Fat Mass)
NCT00362440 (3) [back to overview]Insulin Resistance (HOMA Index)
NCT00372060 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c ) at Week 52
NCT00372060 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2 Hour Postprandial Glucose at Week 12
NCT00372060 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 12
NCT00372060 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c ) at Week 12
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Homeostatic Model Assessment Beta Cell Function
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Insulin
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Adiponectin
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Intermediate Density Lipoprotein (IDL) Particles
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Particles
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean HDL Particle Size
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Lipid Fractionation Total Triglycerides
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Less Than or Equal to 7.5%
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 0.5%
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 1.0%
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 1.5%.
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 2.0%
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Less Than or Equal to 6.5%
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Less Than or Equal to 7.0%
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean LDL Particle Size
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean VLDL Particle Size
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A2
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in C-peptide Levels
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Calculated Homeostatic Model Assessment Insulin Resistance
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose Over Time
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Free Fatty Acids
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol Level
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Triglyceride Levels
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) / Chylomicron Particles
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in VLDL / Chylomicron Triglycerides
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c Over Time
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Meeting Rescue Criteria
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in VLDL Particles
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Particles
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein
NCT00395512 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia
NCT00397631 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Hemoglobin A1C) at Week 24
NCT00397631 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FPG (Fasting Plasma Glucose) at Week 24
NCT00397631 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2-hour PPG (Post-prandial Glucose) at Week 24
NCT00427999 (5) [back to overview]Time to Progression-free Survival
NCT00427999 (5) [back to overview]Time to PSA Response
NCT00427999 (5) [back to overview]PSA Response Rate
NCT00427999 (5) [back to overview]Quality of Life Assessed With EORTC-30
NCT00427999 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rate
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A2
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Adiponectin
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) / Chylomicron Particles
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Meeting Hyperglycemic Rescue Criteria
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Calculated HOMA Insulin Resistance
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Calculated HOMA Beta-cell Function
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in VLDL / Chylomicron Triglycerides
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in VLDL Particles
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 0.5%
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 1.0%
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 1.5%
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 2.0%
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 6.5%
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7.0%
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7.5%
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in C-peptide
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Triglycerides
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Lipid Fractionation Total Triglycerides
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean VLDL Particle Size
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean LDL Particle Size
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean HDL Particle Size
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Particles
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Intermediate Density Lipoprotein (IDL) Particles
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Particles
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c Over Time
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Free Fatty Acids
NCT00432276 (41) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin
NCT00443755 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT00443755 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Biomarker Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α)
NCT00443755 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Insulin Levels
NCT00443755 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity as Measured by Glucose Infusion Rate (GIR)
NCT00443755 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Biomarker Adiponectin
NCT00443755 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Biomarker C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
NCT00443755 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Biomarker Interleukin 6 (IL-6)
NCT00443755 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Thrombotic Biomarker Fibrinogen
NCT00443755 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Thrombotic Biomarker Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1)
NCT00443755 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile
NCT00443755 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Fat
NCT00443755 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index
NCT00443755 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose Level
NCT00443755 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fat-Free Mass (FFM)
NCT00470262 (2) [back to overview]IMCL
NCT00470262 (2) [back to overview]Insulin Sensitivity
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Apolipoprotein B At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 52 Extension Period Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Percent Change in Total Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Apolipoprotein A-I At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline Through Week 52 Extension Period Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Drug-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported by ≥1% Participants Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline Through Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment Index for Insulin Resistance At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 52 Extension Period Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Hemoglobin A1c at Baseline and Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Hemoglobin A1c at Baseline and Week 52 Extension Period Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Homeostasis Model Assessment Index for Insulin Resistance At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Total Cholesterol At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00484198 (23) [back to overview]Total Triglycerides At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fructosamine
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Insulin
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Body Weight
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Plasma Glucose Area Under the Curve (AUC) During a 2-hour Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With On-therapy Hypoglycemia
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Insulin AUC During a 2-hour OGTT
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in C-peptide AUC During a 2-hr OGTT
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 24-hour Percent of Filtered Glucose Excreted in Urine
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Week 0) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%) at Week 12
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 8 and 12(Triglycerides [TG], Total Cholesterol [TC], Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [LDL-C] and High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [HDL-C])
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Standard Laboratory Parameters of Potential Clinical Concern
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With On-therapy Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values of Potential Clinical Concern
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants at Week 12 With: HbA1c <= 6.5%, HbA1c <7.0%; FPG <7 Mmo/L, FPG <7.8 mmol/L; FPG <5.5 mmol/L; a Decrease From Baseline of HbA1c >= 0.7%; a Decrease From Baseline of FPG ≥1.7 mmol/L
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c (%) at Weeks 4 and 8
NCT00500331 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Waist Circumference
NCT00511108 (3) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Index of Static Beta-cell Sensitivity to Glucose After 12 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00511108 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glucagon 3-hour Total Area Under the Curve (AUC) After 12 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00511108 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glucose 5-hour Total AUC After 12 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00531882 (1) [back to overview]Neutrophil Delivery to the Oral Mucosa Using a Non-invasive Mouthwash Technique
NCT00532935 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 32
NCT00532935 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With A1C <7.0% at Week 32
NCT00532935 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 32
NCT00532935 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 1
NCT00532935 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2-hour Post-Meal Glucose (PMG) at Week 32
NCT00541450 (6) [back to overview]Change in 2-hour Postprandial Glucose (PMG) in Participants Treated With Sitagliptin or Pioglitazone at 12 Weeks
NCT00541450 (6) [back to overview]Change in 2-hour Postprandial Glucose (PMG) in the Sita/Met FDC or Pioglitazone Groups at 40 Weeks
NCT00541450 (6) [back to overview]Change in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) in Participants Treated With Sitagliptin or Pioglitazone at 12 Weeks
NCT00541450 (6) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) in the Sita/Met FDC or Pioglitazone Groups at 40 Weeks
NCT00541450 (6) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) in Participants Treated With Sitagliptin or Pioglitazone at 12 Weeks
NCT00541450 (6) [back to overview]Change in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) in the Sita/Met Fixed-Dose Combination (FDC) or Pioglitazone Groups at 40 Weeks
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Beck Depression Inventory Fast Screen (BDI-FS) Score ≥ 4 at Each Time Point Assessed
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2 log10 Decrease in HCV RNA From Initiation of Pegasys Plus Copegus to Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60, 72
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Virologic Response
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Change in Log10 HCV RNA Viral Load at Assessments From Randomization to 16 Weeks of Pioglitazone Pretreatment Run-In Period for the Pioglitazone Arm Only
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α) at Each Time Point Assessed
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-β) Levels at Each Time Point Assessed
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol Levels at Each Time-point Assessed
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Triglyceride Concentrations at Each Time-point Assessed
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL-cholesterol) Levels at Each Time-point Assessed
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Leptin Levels at Each Time Point Assessed
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) Scores at Each Time Point Assessed
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL-cholesterol) Levels at Each Time-point Assessed
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Free Fatty Acid Levels at Each Time Point Assessed
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose Levels at Each Time Point Assessed
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Levels at Each Time Point Assessed.
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) Concentrations at Each Time Point Assessed
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Adiponectin Levels at Each Time Point Assessed
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Virological Relapse at Week 72 (24 Weeks After the End of Anti-HCV Treatment)
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Virological Breakthrough up to 48 Weeks
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Nonresponders During the 48 Week Anti-HCV Treatment Period
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Change From Initiation of Pegasys Plus Copegus in log10 Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) Viral Load to Week 12 of Anti-HCV Therapy
NCT00545233 (22) [back to overview]Change From Initiation of Pegasys Plus Copegus in log10 HCV RNA Viral Load to Week 24 and Week 48 of Anti-HCV Therapy
NCT00554853 (2) [back to overview]Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity
NCT00554853 (2) [back to overview]Brachial Artery Diameter Change From Baseline in Response to Reactive Hyperemia
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 20 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in A1c From Baseline Through Week 20 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 20 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 20 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Percent Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in A1c From Baseline Through Week 20 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in A1c From Baseline Through Week 20 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Percent Change in Total Triglycerides From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in A1c From Baseline Through Week 20 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in Total Triglycerides From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in Total Triglycerides From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by System Organ Class and Preferred Term Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Percent Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 20 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00571519 (27) [back to overview]Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00579813 (4) [back to overview]Effects of Pioglitazone on Changes in BMI
NCT00579813 (4) [back to overview]Changes in Muscle Lipid After Pioglitazone
NCT00579813 (4) [back to overview]Changes in Fat Inflammation Following Pioglitazone
NCT00579813 (4) [back to overview]Change in Insulin Sensitivity Using FSIGT
NCT00586261 (1) [back to overview]Change in Brachial Arterial Reactivity
NCT00631007 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HBA1c) at Week 24 With Last Observation Carried Forward
NCT00631007 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24 With Last Observation Carried Forward.
NCT00634036 (4) [back to overview]Airway Reactivity
NCT00634036 (4) [back to overview]Exhaled Nitric Oxide Ppb
NCT00634036 (4) [back to overview]FEV1 % Predicted
NCT00634036 (4) [back to overview]Juniper Asthma Control Questionnaire
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <=6.0% at Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <=6.5% at Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <7% at Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides at Week 26 to Baseline
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Change in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00639457 (15) [back to overview]Myocardial Contractility-SBP
NCT00639457 (15) [back to overview]Myocardial Contractility-LV Ejection Time
NCT00639457 (15) [back to overview]Myocardial Contractility-DT
NCT00639457 (15) [back to overview]Myocardial Contractility-DBP
NCT00639457 (15) [back to overview]Abdominal Subcutaneous Fat Volume
NCT00639457 (15) [back to overview]Myocardial Contractility
NCT00639457 (15) [back to overview]Hemoglobin
NCT00639457 (15) [back to overview]Hematocrit
NCT00639457 (15) [back to overview]Serum Adiponectin Levels
NCT00639457 (15) [back to overview]Liver Enzyme Levels
NCT00639457 (15) [back to overview]Insulin-stimulated Glucose Disposal Rate
NCT00639457 (15) [back to overview]Hepatic Lipid Content
NCT00639457 (15) [back to overview]Visceral Fat Volume
NCT00639457 (15) [back to overview]Serum Lipid and Lipoprotein Levels
NCT00639457 (15) [back to overview]Hepatic Glucose Production Rate
NCT00641043 (13) [back to overview]HbA1c Change From Baseline to Week 24
NCT00641043 (13) [back to overview]FPG Change From Baseline to Week 12
NCT00641043 (13) [back to overview]FPG Change From Baseline to Week 18
NCT00641043 (13) [back to overview]FPG Change From Baseline to Week 24
NCT00641043 (13) [back to overview]FPG Change From Baseline to Week 6
NCT00641043 (13) [back to overview]HbA1c Change From Baseline to Week 18
NCT00641043 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With HbA1c<7.0 at Week 24
NCT00641043 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With HbA1c<6.5% at Week 24
NCT00641043 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7.0% at Week 24
NCT00641043 (13) [back to overview]HbA1c Change From Baseline to Week 12
NCT00641043 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <6.5% at Week 24
NCT00641043 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Have an HbA1c Lowering by 0.5% at Week 24
NCT00641043 (13) [back to overview]HbA1c Change From Baseline to Week 6
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Anti-Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (ICAM)
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in e-Selectin
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Postprandial Incremental Area Under the Curve for Total Triglycerides at Week 16.
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Adiponectin
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Postprandial Changes Over Time From Baseline for Glucose
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Postprandial Incremental Area Under the Curve for Total Triglycerides at Week 4.
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Postprandial Changes Over Time From Baseline for Glucagon
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Endothelial Function Through Pulse Wave Tonometry
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Anti-Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule (VCAM)
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Postprandial Changes Over Time From Baseline for Insulin
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High-sensitive C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Postprandial C-Peptide
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Postprandial Incremental Area Under the Curve Changes for Lipid Parameters.
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Postprandial Incremental Area Under the Curve for Lipoprotein Parameters.
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Postprandial Changes Over Time From Baseline for Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1)
NCT00655863 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Postprandial Proinsulin
NCT00656851 (9) [back to overview]Myocardial Contractile Function During Systole
NCT00656851 (9) [back to overview]Myocardial Contractile Function During Diastole
NCT00656851 (9) [back to overview]Fasting Lipids and Lipoproteins
NCT00656851 (9) [back to overview]Fasting Glucose Insulin and HOMA
NCT00656851 (9) [back to overview]Myocardial Fatty Acid Utilization Rate
NCT00656851 (9) [back to overview]Myocardial Fatty Acid Oxidation Rate
NCT00656851 (9) [back to overview]Myocardial Fatty Acid Esterification
NCT00656851 (9) [back to overview]Myocardial Glucose Utilization Rate Per Unit Insulin
NCT00656851 (9) [back to overview]Myocardial Glucose Utilization Rate
NCT00665353 (7) [back to overview]The Proportion of All Subjects With HCV Viral Load < 60 IU/mL at Week 72of Step 2.
NCT00665353 (7) [back to overview]The Proportion of All Subjects With HCV Viral Load < 60 IU/mL at Week 24 of Step 2.
NCT00665353 (7) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability
NCT00665353 (7) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Entry to Week 24 of Step 1 in Homeostasis Model of Assessment - Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
NCT00665353 (7) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability
NCT00665353 (7) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Entry to Week 24 of Step 1 in Fasting Total Cholesterol and Triglycerides.
NCT00665353 (7) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Entry to Week 24 of Step 1 in AST and ALT.
NCT00671515 (2) [back to overview]Change in Depression Symptom Severity From Baseline to Study Endpoint
NCT00671515 (2) [back to overview]Change in Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) From Baseline to Study Endpoint
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Change in Fasting High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26.
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-Emergent Minor Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Major Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol (TC) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides at Week 26 to Baseline
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7% at Week 26
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26.
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00680745 (6) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Achieving Glycemic Response Defined as HbA1c <7%
NCT00680745 (6) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change in 2-h Post-challenge Plasma Glucose Rise
NCT00680745 (6) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change in Body Weight
NCT00680745 (6) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change in Body Weight for Participants With Baseline Body Mass Index (BMI)≥27 kg/m2
NCT00680745 (6) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change in HbA1c Levels
NCT00680745 (6) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
NCT00683878 (7) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference (cm) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])
NCT00683878 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving a Therapeutic Glycemic Response (Hemoglobin A1c [HbA1C]) <7.0% at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])
NCT00683878 (7) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in 120-minute Post-challenge Plasma Glucose (PPG) (mg/dL) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])
NCT00683878 (7) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])
NCT00683878 (7) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Total Body Weight (kg) Among Subjects With Baseline Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 27 kg/m^2 at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])
NCT00683878 (7) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Total Body Weight (kg) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])
NCT00683878 (7) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])
NCT00708175 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change From Month 12 to Month 18 in Bone Mineral Density in the Total Proximal Femur by DXA
NCT00708175 (5) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
NCT00708175 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Converted to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
NCT00708175 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Bone Mineral Density in the Total Proximal Femur by Dual-Energy-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA)
NCT00708175 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Fracture
NCT00722371 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 54
NCT00722371 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24
NCT00722371 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Post-meal Glucose (PMG) at Week 24
NCT00722371 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) at Week 24
NCT00722371 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2-Hour PMG at Week 54
NCT00722371 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 54
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Small Low Density Lipoprotein Concentration
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Small Very Low Density Lipoprotein (V1+V2) Concentration
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Very Small Low Density Lipoprotein Concentration
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Median Percent Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Large-Chylomicrons Very Low Density Lipoprotein Concentration
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Adiponectin
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Triglycerides
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessment - Insulin Resistance
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Intermediate-Density Low Density Lipoprotein Concentration
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Intermediate-Medium High Density Lipoprotein (H3) Concentration
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Large High Density Lipoprotein (H4+H5) Concentration
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Large Low Density Lipoprotein (L3) Concentration
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean High Density Lipoprotein Particle Concentration
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean High Density Lipoprotein Particle Size
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Low Density Lipoprotein Particle Concentration
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Low Density Lipoprotein Particle Size
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Very Low Density Lipoprotein Particle Concentration
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Very Low Density Lipoprotein Particle Size
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Medium-Intermediate Very Low Density Lipoprotein (V3+V4) Concentration
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Medium-Small Low Density Lipoprotein Concentration
NCT00727857 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Small High Density Lipoprotein (H1+H2) Concentration
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Glucose
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Creatinine Kinase
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Creatinine
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Cholesterol
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Bilirubin
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Aspartate Transaminase (AST)
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Amylase
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase (AP)
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Phosphate
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Alanine Transaminase (ALT)
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 18
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Frequency of Patients With Investigator-defined Hypoglycaemic Adverse Events
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Frequency of Patients With Adjudication of Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 78
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 66
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Frequency of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 6
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 54
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 42
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 30
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 18
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 78
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 66
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 6
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 54
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 42
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 30
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Haematology: White Blood Cell Count
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Sodium
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Haematology: Platelets
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Potassium
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Calcium
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Frequency of Patients With Significant Adverse Events Based on Standardised MedDRA Query (SMQ)
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Lowered HbA1c by at Least 0.5% Over Time
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With HbA1c<7.0% Over Time
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Albumin
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With HbA1c<6.5% Over Time
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Vital Signs
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Haematology: Red Blood Cell Count
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Haematology: Haemoglobin
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Haematology: Haematocrit
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Haematology: Eosinophils
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: γ-Glutamyl-transferase (GGT)
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Uric Acid
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Triglycerides
NCT00736099 (46) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)
NCT00736996 (3) [back to overview]Change in Cognitive Performance
NCT00736996 (3) [back to overview]Change in Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2 Peak)
NCT00736996 (3) [back to overview]Change in Insulin Resistance
NCT00742326 (2) [back to overview]Change in Hepatic Steatosis and Hepatic Inflammation/Fibrosis in HIV/HCV Co-infected Patients With Steatosis.
NCT00742326 (2) [back to overview]Change in Insulin Resistance in HIV- and HCV-infected Patients With Steatosis Compared to Placebo
NCT00760578 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Insulin
NCT00760578 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Triglycerides
NCT00760578 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HDL
NCT00760578 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FPG
NCT00760578 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FFAs
NCT00760578 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Averaged Postprandial Glucose in Response to a MMT Test
NCT00760578 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Averaged Insulin Levels in Response to a Mixed-meal Tolerance Test
NCT00763139 (4) [back to overview]Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) for Insulin Sensitivity
NCT00763139 (4) [back to overview]ESR
NCT00763139 (4) [back to overview]Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28)
NCT00763139 (4) [back to overview]C-reactive Protein (CRP)
NCT00763815 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With HbA1c Level Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at Week 24
NCT00763815 (10) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Symptomatic Hypoglycemia and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
NCT00763815 (10) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24
NCT00763815 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Beta-cell Function Assessed by Homeostasis Model Assessment for Beta-cell Function (HOMA-beta) at Week 24
NCT00763815 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24
NCT00763815 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Insulin (FPI) at Week 24
NCT00763815 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Therapy During Main 24-Week Period
NCT00763815 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With at Least 5% Weight Loss From Baseline at Week 24
NCT00763815 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24
NCT00763815 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% at Week 24
NCT00770367 (2) [back to overview]Asymmetric Dimethylarginine (ADMA) Level
NCT00770367 (2) [back to overview]NOx f2-isoprostanes
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Original).
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein/Low-Density Lipoprotein Ratio.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Subfractions.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Matrix Metallo Proteinase-9.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Nitrotyrosine.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Platelet Function.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Soluble CD40 Ligand.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Deformability (1.20).
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Soluble Intracellular Adhesion Molecule.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Thromboxane B2.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Intact Proinsulin.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucose.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Deformability (60.00).
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Deformability (6.00).
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Deformability (30.00).
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Deformability (3.00).
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Deformability (12.00).
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Deformability (0.60%)
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Deformability (0.30%).
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in E-Selectin.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Adiponectin.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]The Mean Increase From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Intake of Study Medication Greater Than 80% and Less Than 120%.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Von-Willebrand Factor.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Triglycerides.
NCT00770653 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (≤ 10 mg/L).
NCT00780234 (1) [back to overview]6-month Histology Score
NCT00780715 (1) [back to overview]HbA1c Change
NCT00782795 (14) [back to overview]Pain
NCT00782795 (14) [back to overview]Glucose Tolerance at 48 Weeks
NCT00782795 (14) [back to overview]Glucose Tolerance at 24 Weeks
NCT00782795 (14) [back to overview]Number and Percentage of Participants With Steatorrhea
NCT00782795 (14) [back to overview]Beta-cell Function
NCT00782795 (14) [back to overview]Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT00782795 (14) [back to overview]Pancreas Ultrasound Appearance
NCT00782795 (14) [back to overview]Quality of Life
NCT00782795 (14) [back to overview]Insulin Sensitivity Index for Glycemia at 24 Weeks
NCT00782795 (14) [back to overview]Missed Work
NCT00782795 (14) [back to overview]Insulin Sensitivity (%S)
NCT00782795 (14) [back to overview]Hospitalizations
NCT00782795 (14) [back to overview]Insulin Sensitivity Index for Glycemia at 48 Weeks.
NCT00782795 (14) [back to overview]Insulin Resistance at 24 and 48 Weeks
NCT00787644 (1) [back to overview]PC20
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 24
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 8
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 4
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving an HbA1c Goal of <7.0%
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Decrease of >= 0.5 Percent in HbA1c
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Reduction in FPG of >= 30 mg/dL
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 16
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Decrease of >= 0.7 Percent in HbA1c
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Levels
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting C-peptide
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-I)
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)
NCT00789750 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)
NCT00825266 (3) [back to overview]6 Minute Walk Test
NCT00825266 (3) [back to overview]Insulin Resistance Profile Change - Triglyceride:HDL Cholesterol Ratio
NCT00825266 (3) [back to overview]NYHA (New York Heart Association Classification) Changes
NCT00835120 (5) [back to overview]Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (QIDS-SR16) Total Score
NCT00835120 (5) [back to overview]Change in the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-CR) Score
NCT00835120 (5) [back to overview]Response Rates on the IDS-CR, Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR)
NCT00835120 (5) [back to overview]Remission Rates Based on IDS-CR, QIDS-SR, and MADRS Scores
NCT00835120 (5) [back to overview]Change in Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar Version (CGI-BP)
NCT00839527 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52
NCT00839527 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52
NCT00839527 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 52
NCT00839527 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52
NCT00839527 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156
NCT00839527 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 104 and Week 156
NCT00839527 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 104 and Week 156
NCT00839527 (9) [back to overview]Time to Hyperglycemia Rescue
NCT00839527 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 104 and Week 156
NCT00845182 (2) [back to overview]Effect of Pioglitazone, Exenatide and Combined Pioglitazone and Exenatide on Body Weight
NCT00845182 (2) [back to overview]HbA1c
NCT00855010 (9) [back to overview]Beta-cell Function
NCT00855010 (9) [back to overview]Hepatic Fat Content
NCT00855010 (9) [back to overview]Bone Mineral Density
NCT00855010 (9) [back to overview]Visceral Fat Area
NCT00855010 (9) [back to overview]Subcutaneous Fat Area
NCT00855010 (9) [back to overview]Pancreatic Fat Content
NCT00855010 (9) [back to overview]Disposition Index
NCT00855010 (9) [back to overview]Bone Turnover Marker - Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D
NCT00855010 (9) [back to overview]Bone Turnover Marker - Intact Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)
NCT00861341 (2) [back to overview]Percent Platelet Aggregation Induced by Arachidonic Acid
NCT00861341 (2) [back to overview]Percent Platelet Aggregation Induced by Collagen
NCT00868140 (6) [back to overview]Matsuda Index
NCT00868140 (6) [back to overview]Matsuda Index
NCT00868140 (6) [back to overview]Fasting Serum Insulin (uIU/ml)
NCT00868140 (6) [back to overview]AUC DCI-IPG (%/Min)
NCT00868140 (6) [back to overview]AUC DCI-IPG (%/Min)
NCT00868140 (6) [back to overview]Fasting Serum Insulin
NCT00879970 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hepatic Enzyme Increased or Abnormal Liver Function Tests
NCT00879970 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Need for Hospitalization for Any Reason
NCT00879970 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Severe Lower Than Normal Blood Glucose Level (Hypoglycemia)
NCT00879970 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Need for Hospitalization for Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Shortness of Breath, Pneumonia, or Angina
NCT00879970 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Retinopathy Requiring Laser Therapy, a Decline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), Vitrectomy, and Renal Replacement Therapy
NCT00879970 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Components of the Composite Cardiovascular Outcome for Thiazolidinedione (TZD)
NCT00879970 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Composite Microvascular Outcome
NCT00879970 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Components of the Composite Outcome for Vitamin D
NCT00879970 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Fracture
NCT00879970 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Revascularization
NCT00879970 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Proteinuria
NCT00885352 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Post-Meal Glucose (PMG) at Week 26
NCT00885352 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26
NCT00885352 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) at Week 26
NCT00923949 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00927355 (3) [back to overview]βCTX (Carboxy Terminal Collagen Crosslinks), Osteocalcin, and Adiponectin.
NCT00927355 (3) [back to overview]Bone Mineral Density
NCT00927355 (3) [back to overview]Percent Change in Number of Osteoblast and Adipocyte Colony Forming Units Cultured From Bone Marrow Stem Cells Harvested 6 Months After Treatment With Study Drug Compared to Baseline
NCT00951379 (13) [back to overview]Dichotomized Histologic Response (HR): Participant Complete or Partial Response Defined as =/>50% Reduction in the Sum of the Measured Products of Perpendicular Dimensions of the Target Lesion(s) or Improvement in the Degree of Dysplasia or Hyperplasia
NCT00951379 (13) [back to overview]Biomarker Measurements at Scheduled Visits: Tissue Levels of B-cell Lymphoma 2 (Bcl2)
NCT00951379 (13) [back to overview]Biomarker Measurements at Scheduled Visits: Tissue Levels of Cyclin D1
NCT00951379 (13) [back to overview]Biomarker Measurements at Scheduled Visits: Tissue Levels of Ki-67
NCT00951379 (13) [back to overview]Biomarker Measurements at Scheduled Visits: Tissue Levels of p21
NCT00951379 (13) [back to overview]Dichotomized Clinical Response: Participant Complete or Partial Response Defined as =/>50% Reduction in the Sum of the Measured Products of Perpendicular Dimensions of the Target Lesion(s) or Improvement in the Degree of Dysplasia or Hyperplasia
NCT00951379 (13) [back to overview]Overall Response
NCT00951379 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Level of C-reactive Protein in Plasma Decrease From >5.0 mg/L to <= 5.0 mg/L From Baseline to End of Study
NCT00951379 (13) [back to overview]Biomarker Measurements at Scheduled Visits: Tissue Levels of PPARG Nucleus and PPARG Cytoplasm
NCT00951379 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With >5.0 mg/L in Level of C-reactive Protein in Plasma
NCT00951379 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Affected by Adverse Events Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (v4.0)
NCT00951379 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participant With Clinical Response by Baseline Characteristics: Tobacco Use
NCT00951379 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participant With Clinical Response by Baseline Characteristics: Alcohol Use
NCT00994175 (2) [back to overview]Baseline - Juniper Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Score
NCT00994175 (2) [back to overview]16 Weeks - Juniper Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Score
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Total Body Fat
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Skeletal Muscle Insulin Sensitivity
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Adipose Tissue Insulin Sensitivity
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Liver Fat by Magnetic Resonance and Spectroscopy (MRS).
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Mean Individual Histological Scores
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Mean Individual Histological Scores
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Plasma Biomarkers Relevant to Hepatic Inflammation, Apoptosis and Fibrosis (Adiponectin).
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Plasma Biomarkers Relevant to Hepatic Inflammation, Apoptosis and Fibrosis (CK-18).
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Prevention of the Onset of T2DM and/or Reversal From IFG/IGT to NGT in Non-diabetics.
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Liver Transaminases (AST and ALT).
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Individual Histological Scores
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Osteoporotic Fractures
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Resolution of NASH
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Liver Histology (Using Kleiner et al Criteria, Hepatology 2005)
NCT00994682 (18) [back to overview]Bone Mineral Density
NCT01002547 (17) [back to overview]HDL-cholesterol
NCT01002547 (17) [back to overview]Fasting Plasma Insulin
NCT01002547 (17) [back to overview]Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT01002547 (17) [back to overview]Body Mass Index
NCT01002547 (17) [back to overview]Mean Individual Histological Scores
NCT01002547 (17) [back to overview]Individual Histological Scores
NCT01002547 (17) [back to overview]Weight
NCT01002547 (17) [back to overview]Triglycerides
NCT01002547 (17) [back to overview]Total Cholesterol
NCT01002547 (17) [back to overview]Total Body Fat by DEXA
NCT01002547 (17) [back to overview]Plasma AST
NCT01002547 (17) [back to overview]Plasma ALT
NCT01002547 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Resolution of NASH Without Worsening of Fibrosis
NCT01002547 (17) [back to overview]Matsuda Index
NCT01002547 (17) [back to overview]Liver Histology (Kleiner's et al Criteria, Hepatology 2005)
NCT01002547 (17) [back to overview]Liver Fat by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy (MRS).
NCT01002547 (17) [back to overview]LDL-cholesterol
NCT01026194 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose at Week 12
NCT01026194 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 12
NCT01026194 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 12
NCT01026194 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Areas Under the Curve From 0 to 2 h (AUC0-2h) for Postprandial Plasma Glucose at Week 12
NCT01028391 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (i.e., Week 0 of the 24-week Base Study) in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 54
NCT01028391 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (i.e., Week 0 of the 24-week Base Study) in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 54
NCT01040819 (1) [back to overview]Plasma 15-epi-lipoxin A4
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Electrocardiogram Parameters, Fridericia Corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and PR Interval
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Blood Pressure
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Electrocardiogram Parameters, Fridericia Corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and PR Interval
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in the EuroQol 5
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) for LY2189265
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events at 52 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events at 26 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Attaining Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than 7% and Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at 52 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants With LY2189265 Antibodies at 26 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 52 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 26 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy Due to Hyperglycemia at 52 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA2-%B) and Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA2-%S)
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy Due to Hyperglycemia at 26 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change in Baseline to 52 Weeks on Pulse Rate
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change in Baseline to 26 Weeks on Pulse Rate
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on the Impact of Weight on Self-Perception
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Serum Calcitonin
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in the Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in Hematological and Biochemical Lab Values
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks for Daily Mean Blood Glucose Values From the 8-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profiles
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks for Body Weight
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks Endpoint in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on the Impact of Weight on Self-Perception
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Serum Calcitonin
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in the Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs) Version
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in the EuroQol 5
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs) and Change (DTSQc) Versions
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in N Terminal Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in Hematological and Biochemical Lab Values
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks for Daily Mean Blood Glucose Values From the 8-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profiles
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks for Body Weight
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks Endpoint in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA2-%B) and Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA2-%S)
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Attaining Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than 7% and Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at 26 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 52 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 26 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants With LY2189265 Antibodies at 52 Weeks and 4 Weeks After Last Dose of Study Drug
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular Events at 52 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Rate of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 26 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Rate of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 52 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Pancreatic Enzymes
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Pancreatic Enzymes
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Blood Pressure
NCT01076075 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With One or More Adverse Events (AEs) - Week 0 to Week 54
NCT01076075 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Drug Due to An Adverse Event
NCT01076075 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (%) at Week 24
NCT01076075 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 24
NCT01076075 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2-hour Post-Meal Glucose at Week 24
NCT01090752 (3) [back to overview]Effects of Pioglitazone on 24h Blood Pressure Control
NCT01090752 (3) [back to overview]Effects of Pioglitazone on Sodium and Lithium Clearances
NCT01090752 (3) [back to overview]Effects of Pioglitazone on Renal Hemodynamics
NCT01095666 (5) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Total Body Weight (kg) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])
NCT01095666 (5) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])
NCT01095666 (5) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])
NCT01095666 (5) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in 2-hour Post Meal Glucose (PMG) (mg/dL) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])
NCT01095666 (5) [back to overview]Participants Achieving a Therapeutic Glycemic Response (Hemoglobin A1c [HbA1C]) <7.0% at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])
NCT01103414 (11) [back to overview]Presence of Edema Post Baseline During 12 Weeks Active Treatment
NCT01103414 (11) [back to overview]Changes in LDL Particle Size Subfractions From Baseline to Week 12
NCT01103414 (11) [back to overview]Changes in HDL Particle Size Subfractions From Baseline to Week 12
NCT01103414 (11) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 12 Endpoint
NCT01103414 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 Endpoint in Hematocrit
NCT01103414 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT01103414 (11) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 Endpoint in HMW Adiponectin
NCT01103414 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in RBC
NCT01103414 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 12.
NCT01103414 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
NCT01103414 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c
NCT01106690 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26
NCT01106690 (8) [back to overview]Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 26
NCT01106690 (8) [back to overview]Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT01106690 (8) [back to overview]Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26
NCT01106690 (8) [back to overview]Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT01106690 (8) [back to overview]Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA2-%B) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT01106690 (8) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26
NCT01106690 (8) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT01135394 (1) [back to overview]Change in Insulin Resistance
NCT01147627 (1) [back to overview]the Comparison Between Treatment Groups of the Changes From Baseline in HbA1c at 48 Weeks
NCT01156597 (3) [back to overview]HDL Apolipoprotein Levels at Study End-point
NCT01156597 (3) [back to overview]Increased HDL-Cholesterol and Decreased Triglycerides
NCT01156597 (3) [back to overview]Cholesterol Efflux Capacity of HDL
NCT01183013 (10) [back to overview]Occurrence of Relative Efficacy Response (HbA1c Lowering by at Least 0.5% After 30 Weeks of Treatment)
NCT01183013 (10) [back to overview]HbA1c Change From Baseline by Visit Over Time
NCT01183013 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c After 30 Weeks of Treatment.
NCT01183013 (10) [back to overview]Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Change From Baseline After 30 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01183013 (10) [back to overview]Incidence of Rescue Therapy During the First 30 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01183013 (10) [back to overview]Occurrence of Cumulative Treat to Target Efficacy Response, of HbA1c Under Treatment of < 6.5% After 30 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01183013 (10) [back to overview]Occurrence of Cumulative Treat to Target Efficacy Response, of HbA1c Under Treatment of < 7.0% After 30 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01183013 (10) [back to overview]Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Change From Baseline by Visit Over Time
NCT01183013 (10) [back to overview]Two-hour Postprandial Glucose (2hPPG) Change From Baseline at Week 30 by Meal Tolerance Test (MTT)
NCT01183013 (10) [back to overview]Time to First Use of Rescue Therapy
NCT01186250 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in TG/HDL Ratio at One Year
NCT01186250 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (HsCRP) at One Year
NCT01186250 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in ADMA (Asymmetric Dimethylarginine) at One Year.
NCT01186250 (7) [back to overview]Change in Maximal Intimal Thickness(MIT) by Intravascular Unltrasound(IVUS)
NCT01186250 (7) [back to overview]Insulin Levels Area Under Curve(AUC)
NCT01186250 (7) [back to overview]Change in Levels of Fasting Glucose at Baseline and 1 Year
NCT01186250 (7) [back to overview]Change in Intimal Volume
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Percentages of Patients With Total Adverse Events (AE)
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Percentages of Patients With Severe Hypoglycemia
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]The Percentages of Patient Achieving an A1C <7%
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Baseline Homoeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Percentages of Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypoglycemia
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Percentages of Patients With Gastrointestinal Adverse Events
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Percentages of Patients With Edema
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Mean Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (A1C)
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Changes in Homoeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Changes in High Sensitive C-reactive Protein
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Changes in Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Total-cholesterol
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Alanine-aminotransferase (ALT)
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Change in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol(HDL-C)
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Body Weight Change
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Baseline Triglyceride (TG)
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Baseline Total Cholesterol
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Baseline Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Baseline High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Baseline High Sensitive C-reactive Protein
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Baseline Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Baseline Body Weight
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Baseline Alanine-aminotransferase (ALT)
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Baseline A1C
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Percentages of Patients With Nasopharyngitis
NCT01195090 (27) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Triglycerides(TG)
NCT01217073 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event During the 66-week Extension Period
NCT01217073 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2 Hour-post-meal Glucose (2h-PMG) Levels at Week 12
NCT01217073 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2h-PMG at Week 78
NCT01217073 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Levels at Week 12
NCT01217073 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FPG Levels at Week 78
NCT01217073 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Plasma A1C Levels at Week 12
NCT01217073 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Plasma A1C Levels at Week 78
NCT01217073 (13) [back to overview]Mean 2h-PMG Level at Baseline of the Extension Period
NCT01217073 (13) [back to overview]Mean FPG Level at Baseline of the Extension Period
NCT01217073 (13) [back to overview]Mean Plasma A1C Level at Baseline of the Extension Period
NCT01217073 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event During the 66-week Extension Period
NCT01217073 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event During the 12-week Base Period
NCT01217073 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event During the Base Period
NCT01223196 (3) [back to overview]Percentage (%) of Haemoglobin A1C
NCT01223196 (3) [back to overview]Whole Body Insulin Sensitivity During the Euglycemic Insulin Clamp
NCT01223196 (3) [back to overview]Effect of Pioglitazone on TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) Alpha Converting Enzyme (TACE) Activity in Skeletal Muscle.
NCT01230749 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Day 29 in Body Weight
NCT01230749 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Day 28 in Insulin Resistance
NCT01230749 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Day 28 in Insulin Secretion
NCT01230749 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Day 28 in Systemic Levels of Interleukin 18 (IL-18)
NCT01230749 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Day 28 in Systemic Levels of Interleukin 6 (IL-6)
NCT01230749 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Day 28 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
NCT01230749 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 28 in Twenty-Four-Hour Weighted Average Glucose (24-Hour WAG)
NCT01230749 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Day 28 in Systemic Levels of C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
NCT01276327 (9) [back to overview]AUC0-tz of Pioglitazone
NCT01276327 (9) [back to overview]AUC0-72 of Linagliptin
NCT01276327 (9) [back to overview]AUC0-tz for Linagliptin
NCT01276327 (9) [back to overview]AUC0-∞ of Linagliptin
NCT01276327 (9) [back to overview]AUC0-∞ of Pioglitazone
NCT01276327 (9) [back to overview]Cmax of Linagliptin
NCT01276327 (9) [back to overview]Cmax of Pioglitazone
NCT01276327 (9) [back to overview]Tmax for Linagliptin
NCT01276327 (9) [back to overview]Tmax for Pioglitazone
NCT01280123 (6) [back to overview]Change in the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (DRS-2)From Baseline to 44 Weeks
NCT01280123 (6) [back to overview]Change in Ambulatory Capacity From Baseline to 44 Weeks
NCT01280123 (6) [back to overview]Change in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) From Baseline to 44 Weeks
NCT01280123 (6) [back to overview]Change in Schwab and England Scale From Baseline to 44 Weeks
NCT01280123 (6) [back to overview]Change in the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15)From Baseline to 44 Weeks
NCT01280123 (6) [back to overview]Change in Total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Score From Baseline to 44 Weeks
NCT01280695 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight
NCT01280695 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT01280695 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematocrit
NCT01280695 (6) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Insulin
NCT01280695 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c
NCT01280695 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High Molecular Weight Adiponectin
NCT01289119 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c ≥2.0%
NCT01289119 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c ≥1.5%
NCT01289119 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HbA1c ≤6.5% at Week 16
NCT01289119 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c Over Time
NCT01289119 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c ≥1.0%
NCT01289119 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT01289119 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HbA1c ≤7.0% at Week 16
NCT01289119 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c ≥ 0.5%
NCT01289119 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose Over Time
NCT01289119 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight
NCT01289119 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia
NCT01289119 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HbA1c ≤7.5% at Week 16
NCT01289639 (6) [back to overview]Change in Intra-abdominal Fat Area by CT Scan
NCT01289639 (6) [back to overview]Change in Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity
NCT01289639 (6) [back to overview]Liver/Spleen Ratio Measured as the Ratio in Hounsfield Units Between the Liver and the Spleen on Computed Tomography (CT) Scan
NCT01289639 (6) [back to overview]Change in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels
NCT01289639 (6) [back to overview]Change in Liver/Spleen Ratio Measure by the Density Ratio in Hounsfield Units Between the Liver and the Spleen by CT
NCT01289639 (6) [back to overview]Change in Peripheral Insulin Sensitivity
NCT01301027 (4) [back to overview]Change in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Concentration in Plasma From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT01301027 (4) [back to overview]Change in High Molecular Weight Adiponectin (HMW-A) Concentration in Plasma From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT01301027 (4) [back to overview]Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) Concentration in Plasma From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT01301027 (4) [back to overview]Change in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Concentration in Plasma From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT01318070 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 12).
NCT01318070 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 8).
NCT01318070 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 4).
NCT01318070 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 4).
NCT01318070 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 2).
NCT01318070 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 2).
NCT01318070 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 8).
NCT01318070 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 12).
NCT01318070 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Blood Glucose Measured by the Meal Tolerance Test (Week 12).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Blood Glucose Measured by the Meal Tolerance Test (Week 24).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Blood Glucose Measured by the Meal Tolerance Test (Week 52).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Final Visit).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 48).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 52).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 16).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 12).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 16).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 24).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Blood Glucose Measured by the Meal Tolerance Test (Final Visit).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 44).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events.
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 8).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 40).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 28).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 32).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 48).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 52).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 8).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Final Visit).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 12).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 20).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 20).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 24).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 28).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 32).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 36).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 40).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 44).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 36).
NCT01318122 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Blood Glucose Measured by the Meal Tolerance Test (Week 12).
NCT01341730 (1) [back to overview]Difference of Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) of Atherosclerotic Plaque in Carotid Artery by PET CT
NCT01342770 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Pathologic Response
NCT01342770 (10) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events Graded According to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0
NCT01342770 (10) [back to overview]Post-intervention SUV of PET Scan
NCT01342770 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change in SUVmax From the PET Scan
NCT01342770 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change in PPARy
NCT01342770 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change in p21
NCT01342770 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change in MUC1
NCT01342770 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change in Ki-67 by Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
NCT01342770 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change in Cyclin D1
NCT01342770 (10) [back to overview]Pre-intervention SUV of PET Scan
NCT01352182 (6) [back to overview]Pioglitazone Area Under Curve Estimates by Treatment Group and Route of Administration
NCT01352182 (6) [back to overview]Safety Labs - Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)
NCT01352182 (6) [back to overview]Safety Labs - Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)
NCT01352182 (6) [back to overview]Safety Labs - Creatinine
NCT01352182 (6) [back to overview]Effect of Pioglitazone Area Under the Curve on Changes in IL-6
NCT01352182 (6) [back to overview]Evaluate the Safety Profile of Pioglitazone in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock as the Number of Hypoglycemic Events
NCT01395784 (2) [back to overview]Analgesic Responses Using the Cold Pressor Test
NCT01395784 (2) [back to overview]"Subjective Ratings of Good Drug Effect"
NCT01395797 (2) [back to overview]Drug's Break Point
NCT01395797 (2) [back to overview]Measures of Subjective Drug Effects Most Commonly Indicative of Abuse Liability.
NCT01431521 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat
NCT01431521 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT)
NCT01431521 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline Aspartate Transaminase (AST)
NCT01431521 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE
NCT01431521 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing One or More Adverse Events (AE)
NCT01432405 (2) [back to overview]Plasma Adipocytokines
NCT01432405 (2) [back to overview]Hepatic Fat
NCT01559857 (3) [back to overview]Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at Baseline
NCT01559857 (3) [back to overview]Fasting Insulin Measurements at Baseline
NCT01559857 (3) [back to overview]Change in HDRS-21: From Baseline to 12 Weeks
NCT01588470 (3) [back to overview]Change in E to A Ratio
NCT01588470 (3) [back to overview]Myocardial Glucose Uptake
NCT01588470 (3) [back to overview]Change in Hemoglobin A1c
NCT01589445 (6) [back to overview]Comparison of Changes in Lipid Profiles With Pioglitazone and Metformin
NCT01589445 (6) [back to overview]Comparison of Changes in Insulin Levels (HOMA IR,QUICKI) With Pioglitazone and Metformin
NCT01589445 (6) [back to overview]Comparison of Changes in HOMA Percent B and HOMA Percent S With Pioglitazone and Metformin
NCT01589445 (6) [back to overview]Comparison of Changes in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)With Pioglitazone and Metformin
NCT01589445 (6) [back to overview]Comparison of Changes in Fasting Serum Insulin (FSI)With Pioglitazone and Metformin
NCT01589445 (6) [back to overview]Comparison of Changes in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG)With Pioglitazone and Metformin
NCT01612858 (2) [back to overview]Change in Insulin Sensitivity From Baseline to Week 12 Post-treatment With Insulin Sensitizing Agent
NCT01612858 (2) [back to overview]Change in Hepatic Fat From Baseline to Week 12 Post-treatment With an Insulin Sensitizing Agent
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Lipopolysaccharide Challenge
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Stress Script
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Stress Script
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Lipopolysaccharide Challenge
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Lipopolysaccharide Challenge
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Alcohol Cue Script
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Lipopolysaccharide Challenge
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Lipopolysaccharide Challenge
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Lipopolysaccharide Challenge
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Lipopolysaccharide Challenge
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Alcohol Cue Script
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Alcohol Cue Script
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Alcohol Cue Script
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Alcohol Cue Script
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Alcohol Cue Script
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Alcohol Cue Script
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Alcohol Cue Script
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Stress Script
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Stress Script
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Stress Script
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Stress Script
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Stress Script
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Alcohol Craving in Response to the Stress Script
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01631630 (53) [back to overview]Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period
NCT01637935 (5) [back to overview]Stage of Bladder Cancer (10 Year Analysis)
NCT01637935 (5) [back to overview]Incident Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer (10-year Analysis)
NCT01637935 (5) [back to overview]Incident Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer by Time Since Starting Pioglitazone (10 Year Analysis)
NCT01637935 (5) [back to overview]Incident Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer by Duration of Pioglitazone Therapy (10 Year Analysis)
NCT01637935 (5) [back to overview]Incident Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer by Cumulative Dose of Pioglitazone (10 Year Analysis)
NCT01655719 (3) [back to overview]Tumor Response (Change)
NCT01655719 (3) [back to overview]Change in Serum Thyroglobulin
NCT01655719 (3) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT01703260 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Serum AST at Month 4
NCT01703260 (6) [back to overview]Amount of Serum Alanine Transaminase (ALT) at Baseline
NCT01703260 (6) [back to overview]Amount of Serum Aspartate Transaminase (AST) at Baseline
NCT01703260 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Serum ALT at Month 4
NCT01703260 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Liver Fat Content at Month 4
NCT01703260 (6) [back to overview]Liver Fat Content at Baseline
NCT01717040 (1) [back to overview]Change in Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-C30) Total Score
NCT01748994 (4) [back to overview]Matsuda Index (Measure of Insulin Sensitivity)
NCT01748994 (4) [back to overview]Visceral Adipose Tissue (Percentage of Total Abdominal Adipose Tissue)
NCT01748994 (4) [back to overview]In Vivo Adipose Cell Formation (Adipogenesis)
NCT01748994 (4) [back to overview]Lipid Accretion in the Liver (Intra-hepatic Lipid; IHL)
NCT01838317 (3) [back to overview]Glucose to Insulin Ratio
NCT01838317 (3) [back to overview]Change in Weight
NCT01838317 (3) [back to overview]Change in Serum Adiponectin Level
NCT01882907 (6) [back to overview]the Mean Changes of FPG and PPG From Baseline Between Vildagliptin + Metformin and Pioglitazone + Metformin Groups
NCT01882907 (6) [back to overview]the Mean Changes of Body Weight From Baseline Between Vildagliptin + Metformin and Pioglitazone + Metformin Groups
NCT01882907 (6) [back to overview]Non-inferiority of HbA1C Change From Baseline in Vildagliptin + Metformin Group Compared With Pioglitazone + Metformin Group
NCT01882907 (6) [back to overview]the Numbers of Participants With Adverse Events Between Vildagliptin + Metformin and Pioglitazone + Metformin Groups
NCT01882907 (6) [back to overview]the Mean Changes of Lipid Profiles From Baseline Between Vildagliptin + Metformin and Pioglitazone + Metformin Groups
NCT01882907 (6) [back to overview]the Mean Changes of Insulin, C-peptide, HOMA-IR, HOMA-beta From Baseline Between Vildagliptin + Metformin and Pioglitazone + Metformin Groups
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions - 3 Levels (EuroQoL-5D-3L ) Index Score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Health State Score at Week 26
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG)
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG)
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ITSQ) Score
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Total and Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Events (HE)
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]Concentration of Triglycerides, Total Cholesterol, Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL-C), and High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 26
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in Adult Low Blood Sugar Survey (LBSS) Scores
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Body Weight
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]Insulin Dose Per Kilogram (kg) of Body Weight
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]Intra-Participant Variability of the Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG)
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]Percent Hemoglobin A1c at Week 26
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Steady-State of Basal Insulin Dose at 26 Weeks (Time to Steady State for Basal Insulin [Stable Maximum Dose])
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Detectable Anti-Insulin Peglispro Antibodies at Week 26
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HbA1c ≤6.5%
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]30-Day Adjusted Rate of Total and Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Events
NCT01894568 (18) [back to overview]9-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG)
NCT01909141 (5) [back to overview]Ovulation Rate
NCT01909141 (5) [back to overview]Endometrial Thickness
NCT01909141 (5) [back to overview]Number of Follicles>18mm.
NCT01909141 (5) [back to overview]Pregnancy Rate
NCT01909141 (5) [back to overview]Safety of Pioglitazone as Regards Serum Creatinine
NCT01931566 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline for Cognitive Decline on Composite Score on the Cognitive Test Battery for Pioglitazone-treated Participants Versus Placebo-treated Participants in the High-risk Stratum
NCT01931566 (4) [back to overview]Time to Diagnosis of MCI Due to AD for Pioglitazone-treated, High-risk, Non-Hispanic/Latino Caucasian Participants Versus Placebo-treated, High-risk, Non-Hispanic/Latino, Caucasian Participants
NCT01931566 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living - Prevention Instrument [ADCS ADL-PI]) Between Pioglitazone-treated and Placebo-treated Groups of the High-risk Stratum
NCT01931566 (4) [back to overview]Time to Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment Due to Alzheimer's Disease (MCI-AD) for Placebo-treated, High-risk, Non-Hispanic/Latino Caucasian Participants Versus Placebo-treated, Low-risk, Non-Hispanic/Latino Caucasian Participants
NCT01972724 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 24
NCT01972724 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24
NCT01990300 (3) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG)
NCT01990300 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience at Least One Adverse Events
NCT01990300 (3) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT02002975 (12) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Level) at Final Assessment Point
NCT02002975 (12) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in HbA1c (NGSP) With Number of Metabolic Syndrome-related Risk Factor (MetS-related Factor) at Final Assessment Point
NCT02002975 (12) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Body Weight) at Final Assessment Point
NCT02002975 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Met at Least One New Cerebral and Cardiovascular Events
NCT02002975 (12) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Waist Circumference) at Final Assessment Point
NCT02002975 (12) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Total Cholesterol Level) at Final Assessment Point
NCT02002975 (12) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Diastolic Blood Pressure) at Final Assessment Point
NCT02002975 (12) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Fasting Blood Glucose) at Final Assessment Point
NCT02002975 (12) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Systolic Blood Pressure) at Final Assessment Point
NCT02002975 (12) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) [National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP)]) at Final Assessment Point
NCT02002975 (12) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Fasting Blood Insulin Level) at Final Assessment Point
NCT02002975 (12) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Fasting Triglyceride Level) at Final Assessment Point
NCT02003014 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT02003014 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Immunoreactive Insulin (IRI)
NCT02003014 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Serious Adverse Drug Reactions
NCT02003014 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
NCT02003014 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight
NCT02003014 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions
NCT02003014 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose
NCT02024971 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin
NCT02024971 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose
NCT02024971 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT02024971 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions
NCT02068508 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in LDL Cholesterol
NCT02068508 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HDL Cholesterol
NCT02068508 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT02068508 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides
NCT02068508 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose
NCT02068508 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience at Least One Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
NCT02068508 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Received Specific Daily Dose of Insulin Product at Each Time Points
NCT02072096 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Requiring Alternative Treatment Due to Glycemic Failure of First Line Injectable Therapy
NCT02072096 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving and Maintaining Individualized Glycated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Targets Without Clinically Significant Hypoglycemia
NCT02072096 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
NCT02072096 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT02072096 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio
NCT02072096 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Total Hypoglycemia and Other Categories of Hypoglycemia
NCT02098733 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions
NCT02098733 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose Level
NCT02098733 (7) [back to overview]Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT02098733 (7) [back to overview]Fasting Insulin Level
NCT02098733 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT02098733 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Level
NCT02098733 (7) [back to overview]Fasting Blood Glucose Level
NCT02098746 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose Level
NCT02098746 (5) [back to overview]Frequency of Serious Adverse Drug Reactions
NCT02098746 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Level
NCT02098746 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT02098746 (5) [back to overview]Frequency of Adverse Drug Reactions
NCT02099838 (13) [back to overview]Change of ALT From Baseline at Week 12
NCT02099838 (13) [back to overview]Change of AST From Baseline at Week 12
NCT02099838 (13) [back to overview]Change of DBil From Baseline at Week 12
NCT02099838 (13) [back to overview]Change of TC From Baseline at Week 12
NCT02099838 (13) [back to overview]Change of TG From Baseline at Week 12
NCT02099838 (13) [back to overview]Change of HbA1c From Baseline at Week 12
NCT02099838 (13) [back to overview]Change of 2hPPG From Baseline at Week 12
NCT02099838 (13) [back to overview]Change of Fasting Insulin From Baseline at Week 12
NCT02099838 (13) [back to overview]Change of FPG From Baseline at Week 12
NCT02099838 (13) [back to overview]Change of 2-hour Postprandial Insulin From Baseline at Week 12
NCT02099838 (13) [back to overview]Change of HDL From Baseline at Week 12
NCT02099838 (13) [back to overview]Change of LDL From Baseline at Week 12
NCT02099838 (13) [back to overview]Change of TBil From Baseline at Week 12
NCT02181842 (14) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters (Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-Cholesterol)) at 48 Week
NCT02181842 (14) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters (Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)) at 48 Week
NCT02181842 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Good Glycemic Control (Reduction in Fasting Blood Glucose Level < 130 mg/dL)
NCT02181842 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Good Glycemic Control (Reduction in HbA1c Values < 6.9 %)
NCT02181842 (14) [back to overview]Blood Glucose-Related Laboratory Parameters (Fasting Blood Glucose Level) at Each Time Point
NCT02181842 (14) [back to overview]Blood Glucose-Related Laboratory Parameters (HbA1c Values) at Each Time Point
NCT02181842 (14) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 48 Week in Participants Stratified by Dose of Pioglitazone
NCT02181842 (14) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in HbA1c at 48 Week in Participants Stratified by Gender
NCT02181842 (14) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in HbA1c at 48 Week in Participants Stratified by Levels of BMI
NCT02181842 (14) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in HbA1c at 48 Week in Participants Stratified by Presence of Companion Anti-Diabetes Drugs
NCT02181842 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience at Least One Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
NCT02181842 (14) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in HbA1c at 48 Week in Participants Stratified by Levels of HbA1c
NCT02181842 (14) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters (Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)) at 48 Week
NCT02181842 (14) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters (High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-Cholesterol)) at 48 Week
NCT02192684 (1) [back to overview]Change in Apnea-hypopnea Index (AHI) Outcome Measure in Response to Pioglitazone or Placebo
NCT02303405 (11) [back to overview]Weight
NCT02303405 (11) [back to overview]HOMA-IR
NCT02303405 (11) [back to overview]Hemoglobin A1c
NCT02303405 (11) [back to overview]Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT02303405 (11) [back to overview]Body Mass Index
NCT02303405 (11) [back to overview]Hypoglycemic Events
NCT02303405 (11) [back to overview]Hs-CRP
NCT02303405 (11) [back to overview]Leucocyte Count
NCT02303405 (11) [back to overview]Percent of Subjects Achieving HbA1c < 7.5%
NCT02303405 (11) [back to overview]QUICKI
NCT02303405 (11) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT02338999 (9) [back to overview]Change in Vascular Function and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by PWV at Month 3
NCT02338999 (9) [back to overview]Change in Vascular Function and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by Left CAVI at Month 8
NCT02338999 (9) [back to overview]Change in Vascular Function and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by Left CAVI at Month 3
NCT02338999 (9) [back to overview]Change in Vascular Function and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by RHI at Month 8
NCT02338999 (9) [back to overview]Change in Vascular Function and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by RHI at Month 3
NCT02338999 (9) [back to overview]Change in Vascular Function and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by Right CAVI at Month 8
NCT02338999 (9) [back to overview]Change in Vascular Function and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by Right CAVI at Month 3
NCT02338999 (9) [back to overview]Change in Vascular Function and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by PWV at Month 8
NCT02338999 (9) [back to overview]Effect of Pioglitazone on Vascular Inflammation and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by TBR Value at Month 3
NCT02347813 (2) [back to overview]Mean Number of Squamous Cell Carcinomas
NCT02347813 (2) [back to overview]Mean Number of Other Skin Cancers
NCT02697617 (6) [back to overview]Efficacy Blood Pressure
NCT02697617 (6) [back to overview]Safety: Hypoglycemia
NCT02697617 (6) [back to overview]Safety: Elevated Liver Function Tests
NCT02697617 (6) [back to overview]Efficacy: Glomerular Filtration Rate
NCT02697617 (6) [back to overview]Safety: Total Body Water
NCT02697617 (6) [back to overview]Efficacy: Percent Change in Total Kidney Volume
NCT02730195 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Graded According to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03
NCT02730195 (3) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Who Lose MMR Following Discontinuation of Pioglitazone and TKI Using Blood qRT-PCR for BCR-ABL1
NCT02730195 (3) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve and Maintain Major Molecular Response (MMR) Following a Second Discontinuation of TKI Using Blood Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) for Breakpoint Cluster Region-Abelson1 (BCR-ABL1)
NCT02774343 (16) [back to overview]Feasibility - Subject Retention as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Completed All 12 Weeks of the Study
NCT02774343 (16) [back to overview]Feasibility - Medication Compliance as Assessed by Percentage of Urine Samples That Were Riboflavin-Positive
NCT02774343 (16) [back to overview]Feasibility - Medication Compliance as Assessed by Percentage of Self-reports That Indicate Capsules Were Taken
NCT02774343 (16) [back to overview]Craving as Assessed by the Obsessive Compulsive Drug Use Scale (OCDUS)
NCT02774343 (16) [back to overview]Cocaine Use as Assessed by Percentage of Urine Samples That Were Cocaine-positive
NCT02774343 (16) [back to overview]Cocaine Use as Assessed by Percentage of Self-reports That Indicate Cocaine Use
NCT02774343 (16) [back to overview]Feasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effects
NCT02774343 (16) [back to overview]Cue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Craving
NCT02774343 (16) [back to overview]Craving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)
NCT02774343 (16) [back to overview]Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Splenium of Corpus Callosum)
NCT02774343 (16) [back to overview]Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Posterior Thalamic Radiation)
NCT02774343 (16) [back to overview]Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Genu of Corpus Callosum)
NCT02774343 (16) [back to overview]Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - External Capsule)
NCT02774343 (16) [back to overview]Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Cingulum)
NCT02774343 (16) [back to overview]Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Anterior Thalamic Radiation)
NCT02774343 (16) [back to overview]Feasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Daily Average of the 7-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) to Week 26: Core Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Blood Glucose Excursion During Standardized Meal Test to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7% or <=6.5% at Week 26: Core Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7 % or <=6.5% at Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) During Standardized Meal Test to Week 26: Core Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) During Standardized Meal Test to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26: Core Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Blood Glucose Excursion During Standardized Meal Test to Week 26: Core Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Daily Average of the 7-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During the 26 Week Treatment Period: Core Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During the 52 Week Treatment Period: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Number of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia Events Per Participant-Year: Core Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Number of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia Events Per Participant-Year: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) to Week 26: Core Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 26: Core Period
NCT02917629 (9) [back to overview]Genes With Significant Changes From Baseline to Days 11-22 for Tumor-Normal Tissue: Change in Whole Transcriptome Gene Analysis on Total Ribonucleic Acid Samples
NCT02917629 (9) [back to overview]Genes With Significant Changes From Baseline to Days 11-22 in Tumor Tissue in Treated Participants: Change in Whole Transcriptome Gene Analysis on Total Ribonucleic Acid Samples
NCT02917629 (9) [back to overview]Human Papillomavirus Status Assessed in Tumor Tissue by p16 by Immunohistochemistry
NCT02917629 (9) [back to overview]Genes With Significant Changes From Baseline to Days 11-22 for Normal Tissue: Change in Whole Transcriptome Gene Analysis on Total Ribonucleic Acid Samples
NCT02917629 (9) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Proliferation Index (Ki-67) Expression, Assessed in Tumor Tissue by Immunohistochemistry
NCT02917629 (9) [back to overview]Change in Cleaved Caspase 3 Expression in Visually Normal Appearing Tissue and Tumor Tissue Samples, Assessed by Immunohistochemistry
NCT02917629 (9) [back to overview]Change in Cyclin D1, p21 and Biguanide or Phosphorylated AKT, Phosphorylated AMPK, Phosphorylated S6 (Metformin), and PPAR Gamma Expression, Assessed by Immunohistochemistry
NCT02917629 (9) [back to overview]Change in Ki-67 Expression in Visually Normal Appearing Tissue, Assessed by Immunohistochemistry
NCT02917629 (9) [back to overview]Change in Regulatory T Cell, T4, T8, Tumor-associated Macrophage-CD68 Positive, PD1, PD-L1 Expression, Assessed in Tumor Tissue by Immunohistochemistry
NCT02958956 (8) [back to overview]Hazard Ratio of the 10 Most Common Cancers Associated With Time Since First Use of Pioglitazone
NCT02958956 (8) [back to overview]Hazard Ratio of the 10 Most Common Cancers Associated With Cumulative Dose of Pioglitazone
NCT02958956 (8) [back to overview]Number of 10 Most Common Cancers Cases by Time Since First Use of Pioglitazone
NCT02958956 (8) [back to overview]Number of 10 Most Common Cancer Cases By Dose of Pioglitazone
NCT02958956 (8) [back to overview]Number of 10 Most Common Cancers Associated Cases
NCT02958956 (8) [back to overview]Hazard Ratio of the 10 Most Common Cancers Associated With Ever Use of Pioglitazone
NCT02958956 (8) [back to overview]Number of 10 Most Common Cancer Cases by Duration of Pioglitazone
NCT02958956 (8) [back to overview]Hazard Ratio of the 10 Most Common Cancers Associated With Duration of Pioglitazone
NCT02989649 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Level Over Time
NCT02989649 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c Level by >0.3% and No Tolerability Findings
NCT02989649 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c Level by <7.0%
NCT02989649 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level at Month 6
NCT02989649 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Over Time
NCT02989649 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Remain on Treatment With Alogliptin or Alogliptin FDCs
NCT02989649 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
NCT02989649 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level at Month 6 in Subgroups of Participants With Different Clinical Characteristics
NCT03011775 (17) [back to overview]Coronary Artery Bypass [Coronary Revascularization]
NCT03011775 (17) [back to overview]Сardiovascular Death
NCT03011775 (17) [back to overview]Systemic Inflammation Level
NCT03011775 (17) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability 4
NCT03011775 (17) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability 3
NCT03011775 (17) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability 2
NCT03011775 (17) [back to overview]Diameter of Stenosis [Carotic Atherosclerotic Lesions]
NCT03011775 (17) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability 1
NCT03011775 (17) [back to overview]Thickness of the Intima-media Complex
NCT03011775 (17) [back to overview]Level of Insulin Resistance 2
NCT03011775 (17) [back to overview]Lipid Metabolism 3
NCT03011775 (17) [back to overview]Lipid Metabolism 2
NCT03011775 (17) [back to overview]Lipid Metabolism 1
NCT03011775 (17) [back to overview]Cardiovascular Hospitalization
NCT03011775 (17) [back to overview]Carotic Atherosclerotic Lesions
NCT03011775 (17) [back to overview]Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [Coronary Revascularization]
NCT03011775 (17) [back to overview]Level of Insulin Resistance 1
NCT03117517 (3) [back to overview]Hormonal Profiles
NCT03117517 (3) [back to overview]Cytokines and Chemokines Measurements
NCT03117517 (3) [back to overview]Insulin Resistance
NCT03501277 (2) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Alogliptin and Pioglitazone
NCT03501277 (2) [back to overview]AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for Alogliptin and Pioglitazone
NCT03860753 (7) [back to overview]Change in Stress-reactivity as Assessed by Self-report on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
NCT03860753 (7) [back to overview]Change in Stress-reactivity as Assessed by Heart Rate Change During the Cold Pressor Task (CPT)
NCT03860753 (7) [back to overview]Change in Stress-reactivity as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure Change During the Cold Pressor Task (CPT)
NCT03860753 (7) [back to overview]Change in Stress-reactivity as Assessed by Change in Systolic Blood Pressure During the Cold Pressor Task (CPT)
NCT03860753 (7) [back to overview]Change in Alcohol Use as Indicated by Self Report Using the Alcohol Timeline Followback (TLFB)
NCT03860753 (7) [back to overview]Change in Alcohol Craving as Assessed by Self Report Using the The Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS).
NCT03860753 (7) [back to overview]Change in Stress-reactivity as Assessed by Salivary Cortisol Level Change During the Cold Pressor Task (CPT)

First Occurrence of MCE or Revascularization or Hospitalization for Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) in Lipid Trial.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, cardiovascular death, revascularization procedure or hospitalization for CHF in Lipid Trial participants. (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.7 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lipid Trial: Fenofibrate641
Lipid Trial: Placebo667

[back to top]

First Occurrence of Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE) in the Blood Pressure Trial.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. Primary outcome for Blood Pressure Trial. (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.7 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
BP Trial: Intensive Control208
BP Trial: Standard Control237

[back to top]

First Occurrence of Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE) in the Lipid Trial.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death in Lipid Trial participants. (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.7 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lipid Trial: Fenofibrate291
Lipid Trial: Placebo310

[back to top]

Stroke in the Blood Pressure Trial.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal or fatal stroke among participants in the BP Trial. (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.7 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
BP Trial: Intensive Control36
BP Trial: Standard Control62

[back to top]

Death From Any Cause in the Glycemia Trial.

"Time to death from any cause. Secondary measure for Glycemia Trial.~A finding of higher mortality in the intensive-therapy group led to an early discontinuation of therapy after a mean of 3.5 years of follow-up. Intensive arm participants were transitioned to standard arm strategy over a period of 0.2 year and followed for an additional 1.2 years to the planned end of the Glycemia Trial while participating in one of the other sub-trials (BP or Lipid)." (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.9 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Glycemia Trial: Intensive Control391
Glycemia Trial: Standard Control327

[back to top]

First Occurrence of a Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE); Specifically Nonfatal Heart Attack, Nonfatal Stroke, or Cardiovascular Death (Measured Throughout the Study) in the Glycemia Trial.

"Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. This was the primary outcome measure in all three trials: Glycemia (all participants), Blood Pressure (subgroup of participants not in Lipid Trial), and Lipid (subgroup of participants not in Blood Pressure Trial).~In the Glycemia Trial, a finding of higher mortality in the intensive arm group led to an early discontinuation of therapy after a mean of 3.5 years of follow-up. Intensive arm participants were transitioned to standard arm strategy over a period of 0.2 year and followed for an additional 1.2 years to the planned end of the Glycemia Trial while participating in one of the other sub-trials (BP or Lipid) to their planned completion." (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.9 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Glycemia Trial: Intensive Control503
Glycemia Trial: Standard Control543

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Improvement in Liver Histology

A histological response was defined as a reduction in the NASH activity index by 3 points or more with improvements of at least 1 point each in steatosis, parenchymal inflammation, and hepatocellular injury. (NCT00062764)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone12

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Impaired Glucose Tolerance After Treatment

(NCT00062764)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone6

[back to top]

Mean Increase of Insulin Sensitivity Index

(NCT00062764)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Pioglitazone126

[back to top]

Mean BMI Change

(NCT00062764)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionkg/m2 (Mean)
Pioglitazone1.3

[back to top]

Average Increase in Weight After Treatment

(NCT00062764)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionkg (Mean)
Pioglitazone3.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis

Fibrosis is assessed on a scale of 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating more severe fibrosis. This secondary outcome measure is the number of participants that experienced a decrease in fibrosis score, which indicates improvement in fibrosis. (NCT00063622)
Timeframe: baseline and 96 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone31
Vitamin E33
Placebo22

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Resolution of Definite Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

The criteria for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis was definite or possible steatohepatitis (assessed by a pathologist) with an activity score of 5 or more, or definite steatohepatitis (confirmed by two pathologists) with an activity score of 4. This secondary outcome measure is the number of participants who met this definition at baseline and did not meet this definition after 96 weeks of treatment and thus had a resolution of steatohepatitis. (NCT00063622)
Timeframe: baseline and 96 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone33
Vitamin E29
Placebo15

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improvement in Steatosis

Steatosis is assessed on a scale of 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe steatosis. This secondary outcome measure is the number of participants that experienced a decrease in steatosis score, which indicates improvement in steatosis. (NCT00063622)
Timeframe: baseline and 96 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone48
Vitamin E43
Placebo22

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improvement in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Defined by Change in Standardized Scoring of Liver Biopsies at Baseline and After 96 Weeks of Treatment.

Total nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity was assessed on a scale of 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating more severe disease; the components of this measure include steatosis (assessed on a scale of 0 to 3), lobular inflammation (assessed on a scale of 0 to 3), and hepatocellular ballooning (assessed on a scale of 0 to 2). The primary outcome was an improvement in histological findings from baseline to 96 weeks, which required an improvement by 1 or more points in the hepatocellular ballooning score; no increase in the fibrosis score; and either a decrease in the activity score for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease to a score of 3 or less or a decrease in the activity score of at least 2 points, with at least a 1-point decrease in either the lobular inflammation or steatosis score. (NCT00063622)
Timeframe: baseline and 96 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone27
Vitamin E36
Placebo16

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improvement in Lobular Inflammation

Lobular inflammation is assessed on a scale of 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe lobular inflammation. This secondary outcome measure is the number of participants that experienced a decrease in lobular inflammation score, which indicates improvement in lobular inflammation. (NCT00063622)
Timeframe: baseline and 96 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone41
Vitamin E43
Placebo25

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improvement in Hepatocellular Ballooning

Hepatocellular ballooning is assessed on a scale of 0 to 2 with higher scores indicating more severe hepatocellular ballooning. This secondary outcome measure is the number of participants that experienced a decrease in hepatocellular ballooning score, which indicates improvement in hepatocellular ballooning. (NCT00063622)
Timeframe: baseline and 96 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone31
Vitamin E40
Placebo21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FPG (Fasting Plasma Glucose) at Week 24

Change from baseline at Week 24 is defined as Week 24 minus Week 0. (NCT00086502)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-16.7
Placebo1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Hemoglobin A1C) at Week 24

HbA1c is measured as a percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. (NCT00086502)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 24

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.85
Placebo-0.15

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) at Week 24

"A1C is measured as a percent. Thus, this change from~baseline reflects the Week 24 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent." (NCT00086515)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.67
Placebo / Glipizide 5 mg-0.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

"Change from baseline at Week 24 is defined as FPG at~Week 24 minus FPG at Week 0." (NCT00086515)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-16.9
Placebo / Glipizide 5 mg8.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2-hour Post-meal Glucose (PMG) at Week 24

Change from baseline at Week 24 is defined as PMG at Week 24 minus PMG at Week 0. (NCT00086515)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-62.0
Placebo / Glipizide 5 mg-11.4

[back to top]

Composite Outcome of Fatal or Non-fatal Stroke, Fatal or Non-fatal MI or Episode of Serious Congestive Heart Failure

(NCT00091949)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone206
Placebo249

[back to top]

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Fatal or non-fatal acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina (NCT00091949)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone206
Placebo249

[back to top]

All Cause Mortality

(NCT00091949)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone136
Placebo146

[back to top]

Recurrent Fatal or Non-fatal Stroke, or Fatal or Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction

(NCT00091949)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone175
Placebo228

[back to top]

Fatal or Non-fatal Stroke Alone

(NCT00091949)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone127
Placebo154

[back to top]

Development of Overt Diabetes

(NCT00091949)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone73
Placebo149

[back to top]

Decline in Cognitive Status

Change in modified mental status examination (3MS) score from baseline to exit. Theoretical range of 3MS scores is 0-100. Baseline scores ranged from 22-100. (NCT00091949)
Timeframe: Annual measures from baseline to exit (up to 5 years)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pioglitazone0.27
Placebo0.29

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 54

The change from baseline reflects the Week 54 FPG minus the Week 0 FPG. (NCT00094757)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-54

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-5.5
Sitagliptin 200 mg-0.7
Placebo/Pioglitazone-28.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 18

The change from baseline reflects the Week 18 Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) minus the Week 0 FPG. (NCT00094757)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-18

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-12.7
Sitagliptin 200 mg-9.9
Placebo/Pioglitazone7.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 18

Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) is measured as percent. Thus this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent. (NCT00094757)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-18

Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.48
Sitagliptin 200 mg-0.36
Placebo/Pioglitazone0.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 54

A1C is measured as percent. Thus this change from baseline reflects the Week 54 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent. (NCT00094757)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-54

Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.28
Sitagliptin 200 mg-0.19
Placebo/Pioglitazone-0.87

[back to top]

Patients' Overall Response

"Overall Response= reviewing both the clinical and histological responses and assigning the worst category.~Complete Response (CR) = Clinical CR and Histologic CR, or Histologic CR Partial Response (PR) = Clinical CR or PR and Histologic PR or Stable Disease (SD) Stable Disease (SD) = Clinical SD and Histologic PR or SD Progressive Disease (PD) = Clinical PD and/or Histologic PD" (NCT00099021)
Timeframe: Week 16 (4 weeks post dose)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseasePartial + Complete Response
Pioglitazone Patients0152415

[back to top]

Patients' Histological (Tissue) Response

Determined by biopsy results before and 4 weeks after treatment: Complete Response (CR) =complete reversal of dysplasia or hyperplasia, Partial Response (PR) = >or=50% decrease in sum of lesions, no increase in 1 or more lesions and no new lesion occurs, Stable Disease (SD0 = not CR, PR or Progressive Disease (PD), PD = >or= 25% increase in sum of lesions or new lesion or progression to invasive carcinoma. (NCT00099021)
Timeframe: Week 16 (4 weeks post dose)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseasePartial + Complete Response
Pioglitazone Patients121443

[back to top]

Patients' Clinical Response

Determined by measurement of lesions- Complete Response (CR)= disappearance of all lesions, Partial Response (PR)= >or= 50% decrease in sum of lesions, Stable Disease (SD) = does not meet CR,PR or Progressive Disease (PD), and PD= >or= 25% increase in sum of lesions (NCT00099021)
Timeframe: Week 16 (4 weeks post dose)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseasePartial + Complete
Pioglitazone Patients3144017

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 24

The change from baseline is the Week 24 Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) minus the Week 0 FPG. (NCT00106704)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 Weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-4.4
Placebo/ Pioglitazone15.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 24

Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) is measured as percent. Thus this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent. (NCT00106704)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 Weeks

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.45
Placebo/ Pioglitazone0.28

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Therapeutic Glycemic Response (A1C < 7.0%) at Week 24

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin37.1
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin43.5
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin44.4
Placebo+ Metformin16.6

[back to top]

Confirmed Hypoglycemia During the ST + LT Treatment Period

'Confirmed' = recorded on the hypoglycemia AE case report form with a fingerstick glucose <= 50 mg/dL and associated symptoms. (NCT00121667)
Timeframe: AEs: up to last treatment day + 1 day or last visit day in the ST+LT period; SAEs: up to last treatment day + 30 days or last visit day + 30 days in the LT+ST period. Mean duration of exposure: 124, 118, 130, 95 wks respectively for 2.5mg, 5mg, 10 mg, pla

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin3
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin2
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin3
Placebo+ Metformin1

[back to top]

All Reported Hypoglycemic Adverse Events During the ST + LT Treatment Period

Hypoglycemic Events are based upon the Saxagliptin Predefined List of Events, which are hypoglycemia, blood glucose decreased, and hypoglycemic unconsciousness. (NCT00121667)
Timeframe: AEs: up to last treatment day + 1 day or last visit day in the ST+LT period; SAEs: up to last treatment day + 30 days or last visit day + 30 days in the LT+ST period. Mean duration of exposure: 124, 118, 130, 95 wks respectively for 2.5mg, 5mg, 10 mg, pla

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin23
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin20
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin21
Placebo+ Metformin20

[back to top]

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Neutrophil Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Intervention10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=178, 175, 170, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=176, 175, 170, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=175, 172, 165, 158)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=172, 172, 163, 153)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=148, 130, 137, 128)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=168, 166, 159, 141)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 152, 145, 136)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 166, 157, 137)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 157, 149, 139)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 146)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 151, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=162, 160, 157, 135)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=159, 155, 154, 136)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=150, 149, 146, 121)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=150, 142, 145, 124)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=147, 136, 140, 115)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=122, 113, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=104, 104, 111, 68)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=98, 92, 95, 57)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=90, 87, 88, 50)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 78, 84, 47)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=77, 71, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=76, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=69, 60, 72, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=69, 60, 71, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 48, 63, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin4.230.120.190.070.020.190.270.170.330.340.240.240.030.040.08-0.25-0.25-0.13-0.18-0.35-0.01-0.110.07-0.34-0.22-0.20-0.19-0.29
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin4.190.210.150.220.350.260.400.320.300.410.320.300.200.260.20-0.010.230.030.08-0.050.110.110.32-0.230.06-0.170.11-0.03
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin4.270.150.210.150.160.270.220.380.240.410.170.240.060.210.27-0.03-0.05-0.11-0.17-0.160.00-0.040.000.06-0.04-0.23-0.25-0.14
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin4.270.050.110.100.030.280.110.240.140.160.060.240.150.030.110.020.030.02-0.08-0.04-0.13-0.04-0.23-0.100.02-0.35-0.11-0.40

[back to top]

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Lymphocyte Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Intervention10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=178, 175, 170, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=176, 175, 170, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=175, 172, 165, 158)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=172, 172, 163, 153)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=148, 130, 137, 128)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=168, 166, 159, 141)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 152, 145, 136)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 166, 157, 137)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 157, 149, 139)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 146)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 151, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=162, 160, 157, 135)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=159, 155, 154, 136)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=150, 149, 146, 121)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=150, 142, 145, 124)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=147, 136, 140, 115)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=122, 114, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=104, 104, 111, 68)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=98, 92, 95, 58)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=91, 88, 88, 50)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 78, 84, 48)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=78, 71, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=77, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=69, 60, 72, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=69, 60, 71, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 48, 63, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin2.31-0.020.00-0.030.000.150.070.110.040.140.100.180.020.040.00-0.10-0.16-0.17-0.21-0.20-0.12-0.21-0.17-0.19-0.13-0.14-0.14-0.32
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin2.23-0.03-0.13-0.12-0.13-0.03-0.11-0.08-0.12-0.06-0.12-0.09-0.09-0.07-0.17-0.25-0.30-0.30-0.33-0.30-0.23-0.28-0.22-0.35-0.24-0.26-0.30-0.36
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin2.29-0.02-0.02-0.03-0.010.12-0.020.130.040.220.080.160.070.060.04-0.12-0.12-0.11-0.14-0.20-0.13-0.15-0.04-0.23-0.11-0.21-0.18-0.40
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin2.29-0.07-0.04-0.06-0.040.07-0.020.04-0.080.04-0.070.05-0.020.030.00-0.17-0.17-0.23-0.23-0.14-0.15-0.24-0.20-0.28-0.25-0.35-0.31-0.39

[back to top]

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Eosinophil Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Intervention10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=178, 175, 170, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=176, 175, 170, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=175, 172, 165, 158)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=172, 172, 163, 153)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=148, 130, 137, 128)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=168, 166, 159, 141)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 152, 145, 136)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 166, 157, 137)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 157, 149, 139)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 146)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 151, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=162, 160, 157, 135)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=159, 155, 154, 136)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=150, 149, 146, 121)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=150, 142, 145, 124)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=147, 136, 140, 115)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=122, 113, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=104, 104, 111, 68)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=98, 92, 95, 57)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=90, 87, 88, 50)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 78, 84, 47)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=77, 71, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=76, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=69, 60, 72, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=69, 60, 71, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 48, 63, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin0.210.000.000.010.000.010.000.020.040.040.020.030.010.00-0.01-0.02-0.01-0.03-0.03-0.03-0.03-0.03-0.01-0.03-0.05-0.04-0.04-0.09
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin0.24-0.00-0.02-0.03-0.02-0.02-0.03-0.02-0.02-0.00-0.020.00-0.010.00-0.030.02-0.01-0.01-0.010.010.000.01-0.01-0.000.00-0.01-0.000.03
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin0.24-0.02-0.01-0.02-0.00-0.02-0.020.01-0.02-0.01-0.04-0.01-0.03-0.02-0.00-0.03-0.00-0.01-0.02-0.010.00-0.01-0.01-0.010.010.03-0.02-0.03
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin0.230.01-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.010.00-0.00-0.01-0.00-0.01-0.01-0.02-0.02-0.02-0.01-0.050.00-0.02-0.02-0.03-0.02-0.01-0.03-0.00-0.03

[back to top]

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Basophil Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Intervention10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=178, 175, 170, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=176, 175, 170, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=175, 172, 165, 158)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=172, 172, 163, 153)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=148, 130, 137, 128)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=168, 166, 159, 141)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 152, 145, 136)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 166, 157, 137)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 157, 149, 139)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 146)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 151, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=162, 160, 157, 135)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=159, 155, 154, 136)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=150, 149, 146, 121)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=150, 142, 145, 124)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=147, 136, 140, 115)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=122, 113, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=104, 104, 111, 68)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=98, 92, 95, 57)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=90, 87, 88, 50)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 78, 84, 47)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=77, 71, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=76, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=69, 60, 72, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=69, 60, 71, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 48, 63, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin0.02-0.00-0.000.00-0.00-0.00-0.01-0.01-0.00-0.00-0.00-0.00-0.000.00-0.000.000.000.000.00-0.000.00-0.00-0.01-0.01-0.00-0.01-0.01-0.01
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin0.020.000.00-0.000.00-0.00-0.00-0.000.000.000.00-0.000.000.000.010.010.010.020.010.020.010.020.010.000.010.010.000.01
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin0.02-0.000.00-0.00-0.00-0.000.00-0.00-0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.010.010.020.010.010.010.010.010.000.01-0.000.010.01
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin0.02-0.00-0.00-0.00-0.00-0.000.000.000.000.00-0.010.000.000.000.000.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.01-0.000.000.01

[back to top]

Baseline and Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) at Week 24

Mean change from baseline is adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,
Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobins (Mean)
Baseline MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Placebo+ Metformin8.060.13
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin7.98-0.58
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin8.08-0.59
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin8.07-0.69

[back to top]

Baseline and Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

Mean change from baseline is adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Placebo+ Metformin174.941.24
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin175.86-20.50
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin173.57-14.31
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin179.03-22.03

[back to top]

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Hematocrit During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Interventionpercentage red blood cells (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=181, 177, 172, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=178, 178, 174, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=176, 174, 166, 160)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=173, 176, 165, 157)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=149, 134, 137, 131)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=170, 167, 160, 144)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 154, 146, 139)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=167, 166, 159, 140)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 158, 149, 141)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 147)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 152, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=164, 160, 159, 137)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=161, 155, 154, 137)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=152, 149, 146, 122)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=151, 142, 146, 127)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=148, 137, 142, 116)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=123, 114, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=108, 104, 112, 70)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=99, 94, 98, 58)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=92, 88, 90, 52)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 79, 85, 48)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=81, 74, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=77, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=70, 61, 73, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=70, 60, 72, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 50, 64, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin41.8-0.4-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.10.00.00.2-0.1-0.3-0.5-0.4-0.2-0.1-0.0-0.0-0.4-0.3-0.7-0.2-0.5-0.9-1.6-1.1-1.2-0.7-1.3
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin42.2-0.5-0.2-0.1-0.0-0.20.4-0.1-0.1-0.3-0.2-0.5-0.3-0.00.0-0.1-0.10.1-0.3-0.2-0.4-0.5-0.3-1.2-1.2-0.7-0.5-0.7
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin41.9-0.3-0.3-0.2-0.4-0.4-0.1-0.2-0.1-0.3-0.1-0.2-0.3-0.2-0.1-0.40.1-0.2-0.2-0.7-0.1-0.6-0.6-1.5-1.0-1.1-0.7-1.5
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin42.3-0.5-0.4-0.3-0.1-0.4-0.1-0.20.0-0.5-0.3-0.5-0.4-0.4-0.4-0.5-0.5-0.4-0.5-0.90.0-0.5-0.6-1.7-1.6-1.8-1.7-2.3

[back to top]

Baseline and Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC)

Mean change from baseline is adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,
Interventionmg*min/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Placebo+ Metformin47407-3291
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin44931-8137
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin48224-8891
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin49021-9586

[back to top]

Electrocardiogram (ECG) Tracings - Shift Table From Baseline (BL) to Selected Visits During ST + LT Treatment Period

The normality/abnormality of the ECG tracing was determined by the investigator. (NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 76, 102, 154, 206,

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Normal BL, Normal Week 12(BL n=108, 109, 104, 104)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 12 (BL n=108,109,104,104)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 12 (BL n=69, 66, 70, 58)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 12(BL n=69, 66, 70, 58)Normal BL, Normal Week 24 (BL n=96, 87, 83, 77)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 24 (BL n=96, 87, 83, 77)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 24 (BL n=58, 58, 56, 41)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 24(BL n=58, 58, 56, 41)Normal BL, Normal Week 76 (BL n=94, 89, 92, 81)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 76 (BL n=94, 89, 92, 81)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 76 (BL n=51, 52, 59, 44)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 76 (BL n=51,52,59,44)Normal BL, Normal Week 102 (BL n=80, 66, 65, 50)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 102 (BL n=80, 66, 65, 50)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 102 (BL n=43,45,49, 21)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 102 (BL n=43,45,49, 21)Normal BL, Normal Week 154 (BL n=60, 46, 53, 34)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 154 (BL n=60, 46, 53, 34)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 154 (BL n=26, 34, 34, 16)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 154 (BL n=26,34,34,16)Normal BL, Normal Week 206 (BL n=48, 31, 42, 24)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 206 (BL n=48, 31, 42, 24)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 206 (BL n=20, 25, 28, 13)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 206 (BL n=20,25,28,13)
Placebo+ Metformin8222124661161427602113314196152687916876
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin941022487013154173191841481714353716122232101117
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin9711145582141642751913386317113248121016399911
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin981122447982236741518345511143136101321274916

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change from BL at Week 2 (n=182, 181, 176, 170)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=178, 179, 175, 164)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=178, 176, 171, 162)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=175, 176, 170, 152)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=116, 108, 101, 101)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=170, 166, 161, 138)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=132, 129, 124, 116)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 164, 156, 140)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=144, 141, 132, 123)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=163, 155, 153, 147)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=146, 140, 136, 126)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=165, 160, 161, 140)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=162, 156, 155, 138)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=154, 151, 149, 123)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=155, 147, 151, 130)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=151, 138, 145, 117)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 133, 98)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=124, 117, 125, 86)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=111, 107, 113, 73)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=100, 94, 98, 58)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=94, 88, 90, 52)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=87, 82, 85, 49)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=84, 75, 79, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=78, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=71, 63, 74, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=70, 60, 72, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 53, 64, 33)
Placebo+ Metformin-3.3-2.9-2.8-3.7-6.8-4.3-2.6-2.6-4.1-4.3-4.7-4.5-3.4-2.3-2.9-0.0-1.70.3-2.0-2.8-2.50.3-2.8-1.82.7-1.4-0.4
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin-1.6-3.3-2.8-4.2-2.8-4.3-3.4-4.4-4.2-4.9-3.1-3.8-2.5-3.3-1.9-0.6-0.7-1.7-2.8-1.31.5-1.51.50.73.50.21.7
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin-1.6-2.0-2.8-2.9-2.1-2.2-0.7-2.7-1.9-2.9-2.0-4.3-3.6-2.6-2.6-0.6-0.1-3.7-3.2-0.4-0.4-0.70.30.8-0.0-0.1-2.6
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin-2.5-2.3-4.1-4.2-3.3-2.8-2.3-3.5-2.2-2.2-3.1-3.6-1.1-1.8-1.70.9-0.60.30.62.02.92.0-0.0-0.43.10.92.2

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Heart Rate During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Change from BL at Week 2 (n=182, 181, 176, 170)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=178, 179, 175, 164)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=178, 176, 171, 162)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=175, 176, 170, 152)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=116, 106, 100, 101)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=170, 166, 161, 138)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=132, 129, 124, 116)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 164, 156, 140)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=144, 141, 132, 123)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=163, 155, 153, 147)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=146, 140, 136, 126)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=165, 160, 161, 140)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=162, 156, 154, 138)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=154, 151, 149, 123)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=154, 147, 151, 130)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=151, 138, 145, 117)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 133, 98)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=124, 116, 125, 86)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=111, 107, 113, 73)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=100, 94, 98, 58)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=94, 88, 90, 52)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=87, 82, 85, 49)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=84, 75, 79, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=78, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=71, 63, 74, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=70, 60, 72, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 53, 64, 33)
Placebo+ Metformin0.70.1-0.5-0.6-1.5-1.5-1.5-0.5-0.5-0.8-1.6-0.7-0.1-0.6-1.0-0.5-1.4-1.6-1.8-2.4-0.9-1.2-2.8-0.9-2.7-1.8-1.1
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin-0.4-0.0-0.20.60.20.11.0-0.50.3-0.30.30.4-0.3-0.30.1-0.8-0.5-0.20.6-0.8-0.9-0.6-0.0-1.20.2-1.1-1.2
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin-0.3-0.1-0.20.5-0.5-0.2-0.1-0.6-0.0-0.00.4-0.6-0.7-1.2-1.0-0.8-1.3-1.5-0.6-0.5-0.2-1.7-0.60.3-0.8-0.30.1
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin1.01.31.00.80.90.71.40.41.60.92.40.20.50.60.80.4-0.0-0.30.5-0.3-0.7-1.7-0.9-0.0-2.8-2.2-0.9

[back to top]

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Monocyte Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Intervention10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=178, 175, 170, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=176, 175, 170, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=175, 172, 165, 158)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=172, 172, 163, 153)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=148, 130, 137, 128)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=168, 166, 159, 141)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 152, 145, 136)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 166, 157, 137)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 157, 149, 139)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 146)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 151, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=162, 160, 157, 135)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=159, 155, 154, 136)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=150, 149, 146, 121)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=150, 142, 145, 124)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=147, 136, 140, 115)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=122, 113, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=104, 104, 111, 68)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=98, 92, 95, 57)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=90, 87, 88, 50)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 78, 84, 47)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=77, 71, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=76, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=69, 60, 72, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=69, 60, 71, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 48, 63, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin0.400.010.030.020.010.050.030.050.030.060.040.070.040.050.030.030.040.050.060.060.040.040.070.050.050.040.040.01
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin0.42-0.00-0.010.01-0.020.030.010.030.020.050.020.030.020.020.020.040.060.040.060.030.080.040.070.030.030.060.060.02
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin0.40-0.010.010.010.000.050.020.040.020.060.020.060.030.020.030.040.060.030.040.020.040.040.050.010.010.020.010.00
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin0.41-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.000.020.010.030.020.040.020.040.020.020.030.040.060.050.040.070.050.050.060.070.070.040.080.04

[back to top]

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in White Blood Cell Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Intervention10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=178, 175, 171, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=176, 176, 171, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=175, 172, 165, 158)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=172, 174, 163, 153)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=148, 130, 137, 128)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=169, 166, 159, 142)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 152, 145, 136)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 166, 159, 137)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 158, 149, 139)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 146)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 152, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=162, 160, 157, 135)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=160, 155, 154, 136)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=150, 149, 146, 121)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=150, 142, 145, 125)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=147, 136, 140, 115)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=122, 114, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=105, 104, 111, 68)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=98, 92, 95, 57)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=90, 87, 88, 50)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 78, 85, 47)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=77, 72, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=76, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=70, 60, 72, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=69, 60, 72, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 49, 63, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin7.190.110.220.070.030.390.370.330.420.580.390.500.100.140.10-0.36-0.39-0.30-0.38-0.54-0.15-0.32-0.07-0.54-0.38-0.37-0.35-0.71
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin7.120.17-0.020.070.190.230.260.240.160.390.190.240.110.210.02-0.20-0.02-0.25-0.21-0.31-0.05-0.120.13-0.55-0.18-0.38-0.13-0.36
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin7.230.100.190.110.150.420.180.570.280.670.230.450.130.270.34-0.14-0.10-0.19-0.29-0.36-0.10-0.16-0.01-0.19-0.15-0.40-0.45-0.58
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin7.25-0.030.040.02-0.030.370.080.300.070.23-0.020.360.120.050.10-0.14-0.10-0.18-0.34-0.11-0.26-0.27-0.42-0.38-0.18-0.72-0.34-0.80

[back to top]

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Counts (x 10^6 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Intervention10^6 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=181, 177, 172, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=178, 178, 174, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=176, 174, 166, 160)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=173, 176, 165, 157)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=149, 134, 137, 131)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=170, 167, 160, 144)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 154, 146, 139)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=167, 166, 159, 140)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 158, 149, 141)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 147)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 152, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=164, 160, 159, 137)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=161, 155, 154, 137)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=152, 149, 146, 122)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=151, 142, 146, 127)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=148, 137, 142, 116)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=123, 114, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=108, 104, 112, 70)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=99, 94, 98, 58)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=92, 88, 90, 52)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 79, 85, 48)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=81, 74, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=77, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=70, 61, 73, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=70, 60, 72, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 50, 64, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin4.66-0.030.010.030.030.000.040.040.080.030.03-0.02-0.03-0.010.00-0.03-0.02-0.09-0.07-0.14-0.11-0.08-0.13-0.20-0.16-0.16-0.13-0.15
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin4.70-0.05-0.010.000.030.000.090.040.070.040.060.010.010.020.020.00-0.01-0.02-0.07-0.07-0.06-0.06-0.06-0.11-0.12-0.09-0.12-0.09
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin4.68-0.04-0.02-0.010.00-0.030.030.010.040.000.020.00-0.02-0.01-0.00-0.06-0.01-0.08-0.09-0.13-0.08-0.10-0.13-0.19-0.14-0.16-0.14-0.16
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin4.73-0.05-0.04-0.020.02-0.020.030.010.05-0.010.02-0.03-0.02-0.02-0.01-0.04-0.04-0.06-0.09-0.12-0.04-0.07-0.10-0.17-0.15-0.21-0.22-0.25

[back to top]

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Hemoglobin During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Baseline (BL) (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=181, 177, 172, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=178, 178, 174, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=176, 174, 166, 160)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=173, 176, 165, 157)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=149, 134, 137, 131)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=170, 167, 160, 144)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 154, 146, 139)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=167, 166, 159, 140)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 158, 149, 141)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 147)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 152, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=164, 160, 159, 137)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=161, 155, 154, 137)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=152, 149, 146, 122)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=151, 142, 146, 127)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=148, 137, 142, 116)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=123, 114, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=108, 104, 112, 70)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=99, 94, 98, 58)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=92, 88, 90, 52)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 79, 85, 48)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=81, 74, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=77, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=70, 61, 73, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=70, 60, 72, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 50, 64, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin13.99-0.090.030.000.01-0.16-0.05-0.02-0.01-0.09-0.12-0.23-0.24-0.18-0.17-0.12-0.07-0.26-0.25-0.34-0.26-0.28-0.45-0.57-0.51-0.53-0.53-0.75
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin14.18-0.18-0.09-0.07-0.02-0.160.03-0.10-0.10-0.19-0.10-0.25-0.25-0.22-0.19-0.13-0.17-0.26-0.32-0.27-0.36-0.39-0.42-0.47-0.53-0.46-0.47-0.49
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin14.06-0.08-0.07-0.06-0.07-0.16-0.05-0.15-0.12-0.24-0.16-0.21-0.23-0.19-0.17-0.22-0.10-0.27-0.22-0.36-0.26-0.40-0.49-0.59-0.49-0.62-0.60-0.62
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin14.18-0.18-0.15-0.15-0.07-0.17-0.11-0.20-0.13-0.28-0.23-0.33-0.30-0.29-0.29-0.22-0.28-0.31-0.38-0.40-0.26-0.41-0.45-0.56-0.58-0.81-0.82-0.87

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change from BL at Week 2 (n=182, 181, 176, 170)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=178, 179, 175, 164)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=178, 176, 171, 162)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=175, 176, 170, 152)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=116, 108, 101, 101)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=170, 166, 161, 138)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=132, 129, 124, 116)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 164, 156, 140)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=144, 141, 132, 123)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=163, 155, 153, 147)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=146, 140, 136, 126)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=165, 160, 161, 140)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=162, 156, 155, 138)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=154, 151, 149, 123)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=155, 147, 151, 130)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=151, 138, 145, 117)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 133, 98)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=124, 117, 125, 86)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=111, 107, 113, 73)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=100, 94, 98, 58)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=94, 88, 90, 52)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=87, 82, 85, 49)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=84, 75, 79, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=78, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=71, 63, 74, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=70, 60, 72, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 53, 64, 33)
Placebo+ Metformin-1.5-1.4-1.4-2.2-3.4-1.7-2.1-1.0-1.8-1.9-1.6-2.4-1.6-1.6-1.4-0.7-1.8-2.1-3.6-3.6-3.1-2.7-4.6-2.0-1.6-2.6-2.8
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin-0.9-1.3-0.5-1.5-1.6-2.1-2.2-1.7-2.3-2.1-1.6-2.5-1.6-1.9-1.5-0.9-1.6-1.9-2.3-1.1-1.2-3.0-2.7-1.6-0.9-1.7-2.3
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin-1.0-0.3-0.1-1.10.3-0.6-0.2-0.7-1.4-1.2-0.7-1.3-0.9-0.9-1.1-0.8-0.2-1.2-2.2-0.1-0.60.7-0.72.1-0.30.4-2.8
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin-1.1-0.9-1.6-1.9-0.5-1.0-0.4-1.0-0.7-1.0-1.2-1.3-0.5-1.1-1.7-0.3-1.2-0.8-0.40.70.00.3-1.8-1.4-1.4-2.6-0.6

[back to top]

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Platelet Counts (x 10^9 c/L) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Intervention10^9 c/L (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 189, 181, 178)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=179, 168, 167, 166)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=176, 172, 168, 164)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=171, 171, 164, 157)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=172, 170, 162, 151)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=147, 132, 137, 129)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=170, 165, 157, 141)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=153, 149, 145, 133)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 161, 156, 133)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=152, 155, 147, 139)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=160, 151, 153, 144)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=151, 148, 142, 134)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=158, 153, 156, 135)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=157, 153, 148, 130)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=149, 142, 139, 120)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=151, 141, 143, 120)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=147, 132, 137, 115)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=132, 124, 130, 92)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=122, 111, 122, 84)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=107, 103, 110, 69)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=99, 93, 98, 57)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=91, 84, 88, 51)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=83, 77, 84, 47)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=79, 70, 77, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=75, 64, 74, 41)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=68, 60, 71, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=67, 57, 68, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 49, 64, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin261.013.711.112.08.511.58.27.57.48.56.84.1-2.32.0-2.3-6.4-4.74.713.66.17.04.512.012.513.88.912.29.8
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin258.76.55.15.14.90.54.82.5-0.05.2-1.7-1.7-2.0-0.8-11.9-9.00.1-2.61.43.31.22.21.1-1.8-1.9-8.3-8.5-4.7
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin265.58.411.38.76.74.76.86.15.35.64.93.50.6-0.1-2.6-3.22.60.19.10.31.15.79.28.010.1-2.71.3-0.7
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin256.29.811.88.57.58.59.37.47.13.07.09.73.53.6-4.1-2.43.54.08.66.14.23.26.59.43.2-1.2-2.91.5

[back to top]

Overall Summary of Adverse Events During ST+LT Treatment Period

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event. Related events=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. (NCT00121667)
Timeframe: AEs: up to last treatment day + 1 day or last visit day in the ST+LT period; SAEs: up to last treatment day + 30 days or last visit day + 30 days in the LT+ST period. Mean duration of exposure: 124, 118, 130, 95 wks respectively for 2.5mg, 5mg, 10 mg, pla

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
At Least 1 AEAt Least 1 Related AEDeathsAt Least 1 SAEAt Least 1 Related SAEDiscontinuations Due to SAEsDiscontinuations Due to AEs
Placebo+ Metformin14256215109
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin161651221613
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin177531230411
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin155570273618

[back to top]

Marked Laboratory Abnormalities - During ST + LT Treatment Period

A laboratory value was considered a marked abnormality if it is outside the pre-defined criteria for marked abnormality and the on-treatment value was more extreme (farther from the limit) than the baseline value. Pre-Rx=pretreatment; ULN=upper limit of normal; ALP=alkaline phosphatase; AST=aspartate aminotransferase; ALT=alanine aminotransferase; unspec=unspecified; sodium serum low: <0.9 x Pre-Rx & <=130mEq/L / high: >1.1 x Pre-Rx & >=150mEq/L; potassium, serum low: <=0.8 x Pre-Rx & >=6.0mEq/L / high: 1.2 x Pre-Rx & >=6.0mEq/L; LLN=lower limit of normal. (NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Lab assessments taken during and up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug during the ST + LT Treatment Period. Mean duration of exposure: 124, 118, 130, 95 weeks, respectively, for 2.5mg, 5mg, 10 mg, placebo.

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hemoglobin < 8 g/dL (n=189, 190, 181, 179)Hematocrit < 0.75 x pre-Rx (n=189, 190, 181, 179)Platelets < 50 x 10^9 c/L (n=189, 188, 181, 178)Platelets > 1.5 x ULN (n=189, 188, 181, 178)Leukocytes < 2 x 1000 c/µL (n=189, 190, 181, 179)Neutrophils+Bands <1x1000 c/µL (n=189,190,181,179)Eosinophils >0.9x1000 c/µL (n=189, 190, 181, 179)Lymphocytes <=0.75x1000 c/µL (n=189,190,181,179)ALP >3 x pre-Rx and >ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)ALP >1.5 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)AST >3 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)AST >5 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)AST >10 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)AST >20 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)ALT >3 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)ALT >5 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)ALT >10 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)ALT >20 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)Bilirubin Total >2mg/dL (n=190,190,181,179)Bilirubin Total >1.5xULN (n=190,190,181,179)Bilirubin Total >2xULN (n=190,190,181,179)BUN >2 x pre-Rx and >ULN (n=190,190,181,179)Creatinine >2.5 mg/dL (n=190,190,181,179)Glucose, Serum Fasting < 50 mg/dL (n=0, 0, 0, 0)Glucose, Serum Fasting > 500 mg/dL (n=0, 0, 0, 0)Glucose, Serum Unspec. < 50 mg/dL (n=0,0,0,0)Glucose, Serum Unspec. > 500 mg/dL (n=0,0,0,0)Glucose, Plasma Fasting<50mg/dL(n=189,189,181,179)Glucose,Plasma Fasting>500mg/dL(n=189,189,181,179)Glucose, Plasma Unspec.<50mg/dL(n=192,191,181,179)Glucose,Plasma Unspec.>500mg/dL(n=192,191,181,179)Sodium,Serum Low (*) (n=190,190,181,179)Sodium,Serum High (*) (n=190,190,181,179)Potassium, Serum Low (*) (n=190,190,181,179)Potassium, Serum High (n=190,190,181,179)Chloride < 90 mEq/L (n=190, 190, 181, 179)Chloride > 120 mEq/L (n=190, 190, 181, 179)Albumin < 0.9 LLN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)Creatine Kinase > 5 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)Uric Acid > 1.5 x ULN (n=0, 0, 0, 0)Protein Urine, >=2-4 (n=187, 189, 180, 178)Blood Urine, >=2-4 (n=187, 189, 180, 178)Red Blood Cells Urine >=2-4 (n=175,176,162,166)White Blood Cells Urine >=2-4 (n=175,176,162,166)
Placebo+ Metformin020101920300000000110910000309110170001012132028
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin1504001840131004100000610000109141153003013182226
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin12000112303610041102201210000201911004211107172843
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin150001124011000400011191000030712015300209212738

[back to top]

Lower Extremity Skeletal Muscle Glucose Uptake

Net calf skeletal muscle glucose uptake determined by Patlak modeling. (NCT00153166)
Timeframe: 60 minutes

Interventionumol/kg/min (Mean)
Healthy Controls62.9
Patients With PAD48.6
PAD (Excluding Diabetes)49.5

[back to top]

'M' = Whole Body Insulin Sensitivity

"A hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp was performed prior to and during FDG-PET imaging to measure insulin sensitivity and to standardize metabolic conditions. Subjects were required to fast for 8 hours prior to the study. Patients were given a primed insulin infusion of 2 mU/kg/min. Serum glucose measurements were made at five-minute intervals from an arterialized venous sample achieved by placing the hand in a warming box at 50°C. Blood glucose levels are checked every 5 minutes and 20% dextrose infusion is adjusted to maintain a serum glucose level of approximately 80 mg/dL. Subjects were considered to have achieved steady state when the dextrose infusion rate required to maintain a serum glucose level of 80 mg/dL varied by no greater than 5%. To compute the steady-state glucose disposal rate, we averaged the glucose infusion rates over the last 20 minutes of the clamp and applied a space correction to account for small changes in serum glucose levels over that time period." (NCT00153166)
Timeframe: every 5 minutes for 20 minutes

Interventionmg/kg/min (Median)
Healthy Controls5.0
Patients With PAD3.4
PAD (Excluding Diabetes)3.4

[back to top]

Aim 3: Insulin Sensitivity Index (SI) From Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test [After 3 Nights of SWS Suppression]

Insulin sensitivity Index (SI) is the increase in net fractional glucose clearance rate per unit change in plasma insulin concentration after an intravenous glucose load. SI quantifies the capacity of insulin to promote glucose disposal. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: 3 nights

InterventionmU/(liter x min) (Mean)
Aim 3: SWS Suppression5.87

[back to top]

Aim 3: Insulin Sensitivity Index (SI) From Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test [Baseline]

Insulin sensitivity Index (SI) is the increase in net fractional glucose clearance rate per unit change in plasma insulin concentration after an intravenous glucose load. SI quantifies the capacity of insulin to promote glucose disposal. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionmU/(liter x min) (Mean)
Aim 3: SWS Suppression8.42

[back to top]

Aim 2: Acute Insulin Resistance to Intravenous Glucose (AIRg) [After CPAP]

Acute insulin resistance to intravenous glucose (AIRg) is a measure of the secretion of insulin during the first 10 minutes after an intravenous glucose load. AIRg addresses adequacy of insulin secretion. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionmU/(liter x min) (Mean)
Aim 2: PCOS + SDB With CPAP1614
Aim 2: Matched Controls With CPAP722

[back to top]

Aim 2: Acute Insulin Resistance to Intravenous Glucose (AIRg) [Baseline]

Acute insulin resistance to intravenous glucose (AIRg) is a measure of the secretion of insulin during the first 10 minutes after an intravenous glucose load. AIRg addresses adequacy of insulin secretion. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: baseline (0 weeks)

InterventionmU/(liter x min) (Mean)
Aim 2: PCOS + SDB With CPAP1711
Aim 2: Matched Controls With CPAP695

[back to top]

Aim 2: Insulin Sensitivity Index (SI) From Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test [After CPAP]

Insulin sensitivity Index (SI) is the increase in net fractional glucose clearance rate per unit change in plasma insulin concentration after an intravenous glucose load. SI quantifies the capacity of insulin to promote glucose disposal. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionmU/(liter x min) (Mean)
Aim 2: PCOS + SDB With CPAP0.93
Aim 2: Matched Controls With CPAP2.57

[back to top]

Aim 2: Insulin Sensitivity Index (SI) From Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test [Baseline]

Insulin sensitivity Index (SI) is the increase in net fractional glucose clearance rate per unit change in plasma insulin concentration after an intravenous glucose load. SI quantifies the capacity of insulin to promote glucose disposal. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: baseline (0 weeks)

InterventionmU/(liter x min) (Mean)
Aim 2: PCOS + SDB With CPAP0.87
Aim 2: Matched Controls With CPAP3.67

[back to top]

Aim 2: Mean Cortisol Levels Over 24 Hours, Per Patient [After Treatment]

This outcome is defined as the average concentration of cortisol (a glucocorticoid produced by the adrenal gland) in the blood, measured repeatedly over a 24 hour period in each patient individually. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: 10 minutes, over a period of 24 hours

Interventionmicrogram/deciliter (Mean)
Aim 2: PCOS + SDB With CPAP7.8
Aim 2: Matched Controls With CPAP6.5

[back to top]

Aim 2: Mean Cortisol Levels Over 24 Hours, Per Patient [Baseline]

This outcome is defined as the average concentration of cortisol (a glucocorticoid produced by the adrenal gland) in the blood, measured repeatedly over a 24 hour period in each patient individually. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: 10 minutes, over a period of 24 hours

Interventionmicrogram/deciliter (Mean)
Aim 2: PCOS + SDB With CPAP8.6
Aim 2: Matched Controls With CPAP6.1

[back to top]

Aim 2: Mean Leptin Levels Over 24 Hours, Per Patient [After Treatment]

This outcome is defined as the average concentration of leptin (a hormone produced by the fat cells that affects feeding behavior and appetite) in the blood, measured repeatedly over a 24 hour period in each patient individually. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: 15 minutes over a period of 24 hours

Interventionnanogram/milliliter (Mean)
Aim 2: PCOS + SDB With CPAP65.8
Aim 2: Matched Controls With CPAP57.4

[back to top]

Aim 2: Mean Leptin Levels Over 24 Hours, Per Patient [Baseline]

This outcome is defined as the average concentration of leptin (a hormone produced by the fat cells that affects feeding behavior and appetite) in the blood, measured repeatedly over a 24 hour period in each patient individually. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: 15 minutes over a period of 24 hours

Interventionnanogram/milliliter (Mean)
Aim 2: PCOS + SDB With CPAP67.6
Aim 2: Matched Controls With CPAP56.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Plasma Insulin Concentration During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

Insulin secretion (NCT00220961)
Timeframe: Baseline versus 2.4 years

Interventionnmol (Mean)
Placebo35
Pioglitazone25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose of 2.4 Years

Fasting Plasma Glucose (NCT00220961)
Timeframe: Baseline versus 2.4 years

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Placebo-4.0
Pioglitazone-10.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Matsuda Index of Insulin Sensitivity (There Are no Minimum/Maximum Values)

Insulin sensitivity The Matsuda index was calculated as 10,000/square root of (pre-meal glucose x pre-meal insulin x mean 120 min post-meal glucose x mean 120 min post-meal insulin), with higher numbers indicating better the insulin sensitivity. (NCT00220961)
Timeframe: Baseline versus 2.4 years

Interventionmatsuda index (Mean)
Placebo0.7
Pioglitazone3.6

[back to top]

Change in Atherosclerosis

carotid intima thickness (NCT00220961)
Timeframe: Baseline versus 2.4 years

Interventionpercentage of intima (Mean)
Placebo1.7
Pioglitazone3.2

[back to top]

Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes

Percentage of Participants with Type 2 Diabetes at 2.4 years Post-randomization (NCT00220961)
Timeframe: 2.4 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo16.1
Pioglitazone5.0

[back to top]

Nominal Change From Baseline in Normalized Total Atheroma Volume

The nominal change in normalized total atheroma volume as measured by the average of plaque areas for all slices of anatomically comparable segments of the target coronary artery multiplied by the mean number of matched slices in the population. Assessment completed at the Week 72 visit or Final Visit if treatment was prematurely discontinued. (NCT00225277)
Timeframe: Baseline and Final Visit (up to 72 weeks)

,
InterventionPercent volume (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineNominal Change from Baseline
Glimepiride QD217.619-1.480
Pioglitazone QD206.579-5.528

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Experiencing Any of the Composite Endpoint C Cardiovascular Events

Due to low event rates, number of subjects experiencing any of the composite endpoint C cardiovascular events is being reported instead of time to first occurrence. Endpoint C conditions listed in Limitations and Caveats section. (NCT00225277)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone QD11
Glimepiride QD13

[back to top]

Number of Cardiovascular Events as Adjudicated by the Clinical Endpoint Committee

The incidence of cardiovascular events and composite endpoints occurring within 30 days of last dose as adjudicated by the Clinical Endpoint Committee. Abbreviations: PCI: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; CABG: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft; CHF: Congestive Heart Failure. (NCT00225277)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

,
InterventionNumber of Events (Number)
Nonfatal Myocardial InfarctionNonfatal StrokeCoronary Revascularization: PCI/CABG counted onceCoronary Revascularization: PCICoronary Revascularization: CABGCarotid Endarterectomy/StentingHospitalization for Unstable AnginaCHF Hospitalization: new/exacerbated counted onceHospitalization for New CHFHospitalization for Exacerbated CHFNoncardiovascular MortalityCardiovascular MortalityComposite Endpoint AComposite Endpoint BComposite Endpoint C
Glimepiride QD4130282025231164113
Pioglitazone QD2029255144400354011

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Experiencing Any of the Composite Endpoint B Cardiovascular Events

Due to low event rates, number of subjects experiencing any of the composite endpoint B cardiovascular events is being reported instead of time to first occurrence. Endpoint B conditions listed in Limitations and Caveats section. (NCT00225277)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone QD40
Glimepiride QD41

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Experiencing Any of the Composite Endpoint A Cardiovascular Events

Due to low event rates, number of subjects experiencing any of the composite endpoint A cardiovascular events is being reported instead of time to first occurrence. Endpoint A conditions listed in Limitations and Caveats section. (NCT00225277)
Timeframe: Up to 72 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone QD5
Glimepiride QD6

[back to top]

Nominal Change From Baseline in Percent Atheroma Volume

The nominal change from baseline in percent atheroma volume for all slices of anatomically comparable segments of the target coronary artery. Assessment completed at the Week 72 visit or Final Visit if treatment was prematurely discontinued. (NCT00225277)
Timeframe: Baseline and Final Visit (up to 72 weeks)

,
InterventionPercent volume (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineNominal Change from Baseline
Glimepiride QD40.0160.725
Pioglitazone QD40.592-0.161

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Glucose at 3 Months (3 Months-baseline) US Sample

(NCT00231894)
Timeframe: pretreatment and during 3 months of drug treatment

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone0.02
Placebo24.20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum HDL at 3 Months (3 Months-baseline) China Site

(NCT00231894)
Timeframe: pretreatment and during 3 months of drug treatment

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone6.52
Placebo7.72

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum HDL at 3 Months (3 Months-baseline) US Sample

serum high density lipoprotein (HDL) (NCT00231894)
Timeframe: pre-treatment and during 3 months of treatment

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Piogltiazone4.62
Placebo-2.59

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Triglycerides at 3 Months ( 3 Months-baseline) US Sample

(NCT00231894)
Timeframe: pre-treatment and during 3 months of treatment

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone-49.65
Placebo30.99

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Triglycerides at 3 Months (3 Months-baseline) China Sample

(NCT00231894)
Timeframe: pretreatment and during 3 months of drug treatment

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone32.56
Placebo-79.12

[back to top]

Change in RBANS List Recognition Scores at 3 Months (3 Months-baseline) US Sample

The scale is Repeatable Battery for the Assessment to Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). This scale measure cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia. Range for list learning sub-score is 0 to 20 . Higher values indicate better performance. For change score (3 months -baseline) positive values indicate improved performance for this cognitive function and negative values indicate poorer performance on this cognitive function. (NCT00231894)
Timeframe: pre-treatment and 3 months of treatment

InterventionUnits on RBANS scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone0.27
Placebo-1.11

[back to top]

2 Hour Glucose From Glucose Tolerance Test US Sample

difference between 2 hr glucose for GTT test at baseline vs after 3 months of drug treatment (NCT00231894)
Timeframe: between baseline and 3 months of study drug treatment

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone-24.19
Placebo15.19

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Glucose at 3 Months ( 3 Months -Baseline) China Sample

(NCT00231894)
Timeframe: pretreatment and during 3 months of drug treatment

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone-13.33
Placebo-11.5

[back to top]

2 Hour Glucose From Glucose Tolerance Test China Sample

difference between 2 hr glucose for GTT test at baseline vs after 3 months of drug treatment (NCT00231894)
Timeframe: between baseline and 3 months of study drug treatment

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone-6.82
Placebo-40.72

[back to top]

Weight

Body Weight (NCT00232583)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionkg (Mean)
Metfomin and Insulin107.7
Metformin, Pioglitazone and Glyburide107.9

[back to top]

Inflammatory Markers -Fibrinogen

Inflammatory markers - Fibrinogen (NCT00232583)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Metfomin & Insulin399.0
Metfomin, Pioglitazone & Glyburide395.4

[back to top]

Inflammatory Markers - PAI-1

Inflammatory markers - PAI-1 (Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1) (NCT00232583)
Timeframe: 72 months

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Metfomin & Insulin13.9
Metfomin, Pioglitazone & Glyburide16.7

[back to top]

Inflammatory Markers - hsCRP

Inflammatory markers - hsCRP (C reactive protein) (NCT00232583)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Metfomin & Insulin6.9
Metfomin, Pioglitazone & Glyburide6.1

[back to top]

Beta-cell Function - C-peptide AUC (Area Under the Curve)

C-peptide AUC during a 3-hours mixed meal challenge testing (NCT00232583)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionng*min/mL (Mean)
Metformin & Insulin2096
Metformin, GLyburide & Pioglitazone1725

[back to top]

Bet-cell Function Measured by Disposition Index

Disposition index was measured by multiplying the insulin secretion (C-peptide AUC/C-peptide AUC glucose) by the Matsuda index. Disposition index reflects the beta-cell function adjusted for total body insulin sensitivity (NCT00232583)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionindex (Mean)
Metfomin & Insulin0.12
Metfomin, Pioglitazone & Glyburide0.16

[back to top]

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Hypoglycemia Fear

Hypoglycemia fear was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 - never worry; 2 - rarely water; 3 - sometimes worry; 4 - often worry; 5 - very often worry (NCT00232583)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Metfomin & Insulin1.8
Metfomin, Pioglitazone & Glyburide1.8

[back to top]

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Lifestyle Flexibility

Lifestyle flexibility was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1 to 5, where 1 - a great deal of choice; 2 - a lot of choice; 3 - some choice; 4 - a little choice; 5 - no choice. (NCT00232583)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Metfomin & Insulin2.1
Metfomin, Pioglitazone & Glyburide2.0

[back to top]

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Satisfaction With Insulin Treatment

Satisfaction with insulin treatment was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a scale score of 1 to 7, where 1 extremely satisfied to 7 - not at all satisfied. (NCT00232583)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Metfomin & Insulin1.2

[back to top]

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Social or Vocational Worry

Social or vocational worry was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 0-5, where 0 - does not apply; 1 - never; 2 - seldom; 3 - sometimes; 4 - often; 5 - all of the time. (NCT00232583)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Metfomin & Insulin1.8
Metfomin, Pioglitazone & Glyburide1.7

[back to top]

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Social Stigma

Social stigma was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1 to 5, where 1- strongly agree; 2 - somewhat agree; 3 - neither agree nor disagree; 4 - somewhat disagree; 5 - strongly disagree. (NCT00232583)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Metfomin & Insulin2.2
Metfomin, Pioglitazone & Glyburide2.2

[back to top]

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Treatment Impact

Treatment impact was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 - very satisfied; 2 - moderately satisfied; 3 - neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4 - moderately dissatisfied; 5 - very dissatisfied. (NCT00232583)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionscore on a sale (Mean)
Metfomin & Insulin1.7
Metfomin, Pioglitazone & Glyburide1.8

[back to top]

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Treatment Satisfaction

Treatment satisfaction was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 - very satisfied; 2 - moderately satisfied; 3 - neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4 - moderately dissatisfied; 5 - very dissatisfied. (NCT00232583)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Metfomin & Insulin1.7
Metfomin, Pioglitazone & Glyburide2.1

[back to top]

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Willingness to Continue Insulin Treatment

Willingness to continue insulin treatment was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a scale score of 1 to 7, where 1 extremely willing to 7 - not at all willing. (NCT00232583)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Metfomin & Insulin1.4

[back to top]

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Current Health Perception

Current health perception was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 = much better than 3 months ago; 2 - Somewhat better now than 3 months ago; 3 - About the same; 4 - Somewhat worse now than 3 months ago; 5 Much worse now than 3 months ago. (NCT00232583)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Metfomin & Insulin2.7
Metfomin, Pioglitazone & Glyburide2.9

[back to top]

Insulin Sensitivity as Measure be Matsuda Index

C-peptide-based Matsuda index using following formula: Matsuda index = 500,00 / root square [(fasting c-peptide x fasting glucose x 333) x (average c-peptide 0-120 mins x average glucose 0-120 mins x 333). Higher the Matsuda index, better the insulin sensitivity. (NCT00232583)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionindex (Mean)
Metfomin & Insulin3.12
Metfomin, Pioglitazone & Glyburide2.45

[back to top]

Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Glycemia Control Perception

Glycemia control perception was measured at randomization and 72 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a scale score of 1-7, where 1 - extremely controlled and 7 - not at all controlled. (NCT00232583)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Metfomin & Insulin2.8
Metfomin, Pioglitazone & Glyburide2.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26.

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 26 or final visit and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.19
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.66
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.80

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin (Week 8).

The change between the value of fasting proinsulin collected at week 8 and fasting proinsulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8.

Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.3
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-6.5
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-3.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin (Week 16).

The change between the value of fasting proinsulin collected at week 16 and fasting proinsulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16.

Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-3.1
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-3.5
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-3.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin (Week 20).

The change between the value of fasting proinsulin collected at week 20 and fasting proinsulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20.

Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.9
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-6.2
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-3.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin (Week 4).

The change between the value of fasting proinsulin collected at week 4 and fasting proinsulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4.

Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.7
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-7.0
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-5.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin (Week 26).

The change between the value of fasting proinsulin collected at week 26 or final visit and fasting proinsulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26.

Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.0
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-5.1
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-1.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Decrease From Baseline ≥ 2.0%.

The number of participants with a decrease from baseline in the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (the percentage of hemoglobin that is bound to glucose) greater than or equal to 2.0% during the 26 week study. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo3
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD12
Alogliptin 25 mg QD14

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia (Fasting Plasma Glucose ≥ 200 mg Per dL).

The number of participants with a fasting plasma glucose value greater than or equal to 200 mg per dL during the 26 week study. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: 26 Weeks.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo43
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD49
Alogliptin 25 mg QD43

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 12).

The change in the value of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 12 and Glycosylated Hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.23
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.70
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.82

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio (Week 26).

The change between the ratio value of proinsulin and insulin collected at week 26 or final visit and the ratio value of proinsulin and insulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26.

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.015
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.035
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.022

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight (Week 20).

The change between Body Weight measured at week 20 and Body Weight measured at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20.

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.94
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD1.14
Alogliptin 25 mg QD0.93

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight (Week 26).

The change between Body Weight measured at week 26 or final visit and Body Weight measured at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26.

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.04
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD1.46
Alogliptin 25 mg QD1.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight (Week 8).

The change between Body Weight measured at week 8 and Body Weight measured at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8.

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.36
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD0.46
Alogliptin 25 mg QD0.39

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in C-peptide (Week 12).

The change between the value of C-peptide collected at week 12 and C-peptide collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.017
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.085
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.067

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in C-peptide (Week 16).

The change between the value of C-peptide collected at week 16 and C-peptide collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16.

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.290
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.071
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.052

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in C-peptide (Week 20).

The change between the value of C-peptide collected at week 20 and C-peptide collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20.

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.255
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.228
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.123

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in C-peptide (Week 26).

The change between the value of C-peptide collected at week 26 or final visit and C-peptide collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26.

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.356
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.233
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.133

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in C-peptide (Week 4).

The change between the value of C-peptide collected at week 4 and C-peptide collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4.

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.144
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.156
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.088

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in C-peptide (Week 8).

The change between the value of C-peptide collected at week 8 and C-peptide collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8.

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.111
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.117
Alogliptin 25 mg QD0.023

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 1).

The change between the value of fasting plasma glucose collected at final visit or week 1 and fasting plasma glucose collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 1.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.7
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-14.2
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-18.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio (Week 12).

The change between the ratio value of proinsulin and insulin collected at week 12 and the ratio value of proinsulin and insulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.017
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.029
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.040

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 16).

The change in the value of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 16 and Glycosylated Hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.26
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.70
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.84

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 20).

The change in the value of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 20 and Glycosylated Hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.27
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.68
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.82

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 4).

The change in the value of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 4 and Glycosylated Hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.14
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.40
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 8).

The change in the value of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 8 and Glycosylated Hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.18
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.60
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.73

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Insulin (Week 12).

The change between the value of insulin collected at week 12 and insulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

InterventionmcIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.00
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD0.43
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.58

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Insulin (Week 16).

The change between the value of insulin collected at week 16 and insulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16.

InterventionmcIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.85
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.10
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Insulin (Week 20).

The change between the value of insulin collected at week 20 and insulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20.

InterventionmcIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.19
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.40
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.33

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Insulin (Week 26).

The change between the value of insulin collected at week 26 and insulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26.

InterventionmcIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.81
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.19
Alogliptin 25 mg QD0.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Insulin (Week 4).

The change between the value of insulin collected at week 4 and insulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4.

InterventionmcIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.09
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-1.08
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.97

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Insulin (Week 8).

The change between the value of insulin collected at week 8 and insulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8.

InterventionmcIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.17
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.82
Alogliptin 25 mg QD0.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 12).

The change between the value of fasting plasma glucose collected at week 12 and fasting plasma glucose collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-9.9
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-20.4
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-26.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio (Week 16).

The change between the ratio value of proinsulin and insulin collected at week 16 and the ratio value of proinsulin and insulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16.

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.015
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.042
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.045

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio (Week 20).

The change between the ratio value of proinsulin and insulin collected at week 20 and the ratio value of proinsulin and insulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20.

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.012
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.047
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.040

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio (Week 4).

The change between the ratio value of proinsulin and insulin collected at week 4 and the ratio value of proinsulin and insulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4.

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.006
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.051
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.053

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio (Week 8).

The change between the ratio value of proinsulin and insulin collected at week 8 and the ratio value of proinsulin and insulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8.

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.006
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-0.055
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.057

[back to top]

Number of Participants Requiring Rescue.

The number of participants requiring rescue for failing to achieve pre-specified glycemic targets during the 26 week study. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: 26 Weeks.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo12
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD19
Alogliptin 25 mg QD18

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 6.5%.

The number of participants with a value for the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (the percentage of hemoglobin that is bound to glucose) less than or equal to 6.5% during the 26 week study. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo5
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD34
Alogliptin 25 mg QD41

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7.0%.

The number of participants with a value for the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin less (the percentage of hemoglobin that is bound to glucose) than or equal to 7.0% during the 26 week study. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo33
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD87
Alogliptin 25 mg QD98

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7.5%.

The number of participants with a value for the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (the percentage of hemoglobin that is bound to glucose) less than or equal to 7.5% during the 26 week study. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo47
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD127
Alogliptin 25 mg QD141

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Decrease From Baseline ≥ 0.5%.

The number of participants with a decrease from baseline in the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (the percentage of hemoglobin that is bound to glucose) greater than or equal to 0.5% during the 26 week study. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo26
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD118
Alogliptin 25 mg QD128

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Decrease From Baseline ≥ 1.0%.

The number of participants with a decrease from baseline in the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (the percentage of hemoglobin that is bound to glucose) greater than or equal to 1.0% during the 26 week study. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo12
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD64
Alogliptin 25 mg QD73

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Decrease From Baseline ≥ 1.5%.

The number of participants with a decrease from baseline in the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (the percentage of hemoglobin that is bound to glucose) greater than or equal to 1.5% during the 26 week study. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo5
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD32
Alogliptin 25 mg QD37

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 16).

The change between the value of fasting plasma glucose collected at week 16 and fasting plasma glucose collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-8.3
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-18.3
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-22.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 2).

The change between the value of fasting plasma glucose collected at week 2 and fasting plasma glucose collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.8
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-21.0
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-21.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 20).

The change between the value of fasting plasma glucose collected at week 20 and fasting plasma glucose collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-6.4
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-21.9
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-21.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 26).

The change between the value of fasting plasma glucose collected at week 26 or final visit and fasting plasma glucose collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-5.7
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-19.7
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-19.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 4).

The change between the value of fasting plasma glucose collected at week 4 and fasting plasma glucose collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-3.1
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-23.7
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-26.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 8).

The change between the value of fasting plasma glucose collected at week 8 and fasting plasma glucose collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-6.1
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-22.6
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-27.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight (Week 12).

The change between Body Weight measured at week 12 and Body Weight measured at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.60
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD0.74
Alogliptin 25 mg QD0.64

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin (Week 12).

The change between the value of fasting proinsulin collected at week 12 and fasting proinsulin collected at baseline. (NCT00286494)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.6
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD-3.6
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-3.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving A1c <7% at Week 24

Percentage of participants achieving A1C < 7%, the American Diabetic Association's defined goal for glycemia, at each dose of saxagliptin plus TZD versus placebo plus TZD at Week 24. (NCT00295633)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg Plus Open-label TZD42.2
Saxagliptin 5 mg Plus Open-label TZD41.8
Placebo Plus Open-label TZD25.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) at Week 24

Mean change from baseline in A1C at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00295633)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Placebo Plus Open-label TZD8.197.91-0.30
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg Plus Open-label TZD8.257.59-0.66
Saxagliptin 5 mg Plus Open-label TZD8.357.39-0.94

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC) Response to an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) at Week 24

Mean change from baseline for 0 to 180 minutes PPG AUC achieved at each dose of saxagliptin plus TZD versus placebo plus TZD at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00295633)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionmg*min/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Placebo Plus Open-label TZD4725644819-2690
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg Plus Open-label TZD4830140255-7849
Saxagliptin 5 mg Plus Open-label TZD4786638587-9269

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

Mean change from baseline in FPG at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00295633)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Placebo Plus Open-label TZD162.4159.3-2.8
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg Plus Open-label TZD163.0148.2-14.3
Saxagliptin 5 mg Plus Open-label TZD159.5143.0-17.3

[back to top]

Mean Increase in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Baseline and 12 Weeks

Mean increase in HDL-C from baseline (week -4) to 12 weeks post randomization in non-diabetic subjects with low HDL-C and metabolic syndrome. After baseline, all subjects titrated niacin extended release (ER) to 2 grams (g) daily over 4 weeks. Subjects were also given 325 mg aspirin to take 30 minutes before the niacin ER. After 4 weeks, half of the subjects added blinded pioglitazone 30mg/day (milligrams/day) for 6 weeks followed by 45 mg/day for 6 weeks; the other half added placebo. HDL-C was was assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post randomization (NCT00300365)
Timeframe: Baseline, after 12 weeks of pioglitazone vs placebo

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline HDL-CHDL-C 12 weeks Post Randomization
Active Pioglitazone + Open-Label Niacin + Asprin36.244.2
Pioglitazone Placebo + Open-Label Niacin + Aspirin37.440.6

[back to top]

Lean Body Mass

(NCT00315146)
Timeframe: Baseline visit (pre intervention) and 4month follow up (post intervention)

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Hypocaloric Diet (and Placebo)-2.55
Hypocaloric Diet, Resist. Training to Maximize Power, Placebo-1.89
Hypocaloric Diet and a PPAR- γ Agonist (Pioglitazone/Actos™)-2.38
Hypocaloric Diet,Resistance Training, Pioglitazone/Actos™-1.65

[back to top]

Appendicular Non-bone Lean Mass

Change in Appendicular Non-bone Lean Mass (NCT00315146)
Timeframe: Baseline visit (pre intervention) and 4month follow up (post intervention)

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Hypocaloric Weight Loss Only-2.53
Hypocaloric Weight Loss + Pioglitazone-2.49
Hypocaloric Weight-loss +Resistance Training-2.04
Hypocaloric Weight Loss + Resistance Training + Pioglitazone-1.45

[back to top]

Sputum TNFα

The concentration of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNFα) log 10 (pg/mL) (NCT00322868)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Day 29

Interventionlog 10 (pg/mL) (Mean)
Baseline1.74
Post-Treatment1.69

[back to top]

Sputum White Cell Count

The total number of white cells log 10 cells/mL (NCT00322868)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Day 29

Interventionlog 10 (cells/mL) (Mean)
Baseline6.93
Post-Treatment6.81

[back to top]

Sputum Neutrophil Percent

Neutrophils as a percent of the total white cells. (NCT00322868)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Day 29

InterventionPercent (%) of white blood cells (Mean)
Baseline82.47
Post-Treatment74.44

[back to top]

Sputum Neutrophil Count

sputum neutrophils log 10 (cells/mL) (NCT00322868)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Day 29

Interventionlog 10 (cells/mL) (Mean)
Baseline6.88
Post-Treatment6.75

[back to top]

Sputum IL-8

Concentration of Interleukin-8 log 10 (pg/mL) (NCT00322868)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Day 29

Interventionlog 10 (pg/mL) (Mean)
Baseline5.13
Post-Treatment5.10

[back to top]

Sputum IL-6

The concentration of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) log 10 (pg/mL) (NCT00322868)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Day 29

Interventionlog 10 (pg/mL) (Mean)
Baseline1.38
Post-Treatment1.41

[back to top]

Sputum IL-1ß

The concentration of Interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) log 10 (pg/mL) (NCT00322868)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Day 29

Interventionlog 10 (pg/mL) (Mean)
Baseline4.05
Post-Treatment3.99

[back to top]

Sputum Active Elastase

Log 10 of Concentration of active Elastase in mcg/mL (NCT00322868)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Day 29

Interventionlog 10 (mcg/mL) (Mean)
Baseline2.03
Post-Treatment1.96

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving A1C ≤6.5% at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy

Percentage of participants achieving A1C ≤6.5%, at each dose of saxagliptin plus metformin versus saxagliptin alone at Week 24. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin45.3
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin40.6
Saxagliptin 10 mg20.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue or Discontinuation at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy

Percentage of participants requiring rescue for failing to achieve pre-specified glycemic targets or discontinuing for lack of efficacy within the 24-week treatment period at each dose of saxagliptin plus metformin versus metformin alone. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin7.5
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin5.9
Metformin10.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue or Discontinuation at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy

Percentage of participants requiring rescue for failing to achieve pre-specified glycemic targets or discontinuing for lack of efficacy within the 24-week treatment period at each dose of saxagliptin plus metformin versus saxagliptin alone. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin7.5
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin5.9
Saxagliptin 10 mg21.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy

Mean change from baseline in A1C at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Saxagliptin 10 mg9.617.86-1.69
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin9.537.02-2.49
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin9.416.93-2.53

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy

Mean change from baseline in FPG at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Saxagliptin 10 mg200.9169.9-30.9
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin204.3140.1-62.2
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin198.9140.2-59.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy

Mean change from baseline in FPG at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Metformin199.1152.7-47.3
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin204.3140.1-62.2
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin198.9140.2-59.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy

Mean change from baseline in A1C at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Metformin9.437.48-1.99
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin9.537.02-2.49
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin9.416.93-2.53

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving A1C ≤6.5% at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy

Percentage of participants achieving A1C ≤6.5%, at each dose of saxagliptin plus metformin versus metformin alone at Week 24. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin45.3
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin40.6
Metformin29.0

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC) Response to an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy

Mean change from baseline for 0 to 180 minutes PPG AUC at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionmg*min/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Saxagliptin 10 mg5758441229-16054
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin5721935790-21336
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin5553135324-21080

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC) Response to an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy

Mean change from baseline for 0 to 180 minutes PPG AUC at Week 24, adjsuted for baseline value. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionmg*min/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Metformin5793742428-15005
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin5721935790-21336
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin5553135324-21080

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving A1C < 7% at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy

Percentage of participants achieving A1C < 7%, the American Diabetes Association's defined goal for glycemia, at each dose of saxagliptin plus metformin versus saxagliptin alone at Week 24. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin60.3
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin59.7
Saxagliptin 10 mg32.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving A1C < 7% at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy

Percentage of participants achieving A1C < 7%, the American Diabetes Association's defined goal for glycemia, at each dose of saxagliptin plus metformin versus metformin alone at Week 24. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin60.3
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin59.7
Metformin41.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 0.5%

Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 0.5%. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo31.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo57.8
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo66.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 1561.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 1586.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 1579.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 3068.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 3086.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 3083.8
Placebo + Pioglitazone 4572.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 4583.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 4586.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Meeting Rescue Criteria (Grouped Analysis)

"Rescue was defined as meeting 1 of the following criteria, confirmed by a 2nd sample drawn within 5 days of the first and analyzed by the central laboratory:~After the Week 1 Visit but prior to the Week 4 Visit: a single fasting plasma glucose ≥300 mg/dL;~From the Week 4 Visit but prior to the Week 8 Visit: a single fasting plasma glucose ≥275 mg/dL;~From the Week 8 Visit but prior to the Week 12 Visit: a single fasting plasma glucose ≥250 mg/dL;~From the Week 12 Visit through the End-of-Treatment Visit: HbA1c ≥8.5% and ≤0.5% reduction in HbA1c as compared with Baseline HbA1c." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: From Week 1 to Week 26.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pioglitazone Alone11.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone3.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone3.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Meeting Rescue Criteria

"Rescue was defined as meeting 1 of the following criteria, confirmed by a 2nd sample drawn within 5 days of the first and analyzed by the central laboratory:~After the Week 1 Visit but prior to the Week 4 Visit: a single fasting plasma glucose ≥300 mg/dL;~From the Week 4 Visit but prior to the Week 8 Visit: a single fasting plasma glucose ≥275 mg/dL;~From the Week 8 Visit but prior to the Week 12 Visit: a single fasting plasma glucose ≥250 mg/dL;~From the Week 12 Visit through the End-of-Treatment Visit: HbA1c ≥8.5% and ≤0.5% reduction in HbA1c as compared with Baseline HbA1c." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: From Week 1 to Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo32.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo14.5
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo12.8
Placebo + Pioglitazone 1510.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 154.7
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 153.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 3015.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 304.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 304.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 458.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 452.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 451.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Triglyceride Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline triglycerides as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo26.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-16.4
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-23.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-20.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-30.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-46.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-30.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-43.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-44.5
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-53.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-60.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-52.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Total Cholesterol Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline total cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo10.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-1.4
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 157.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-2.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-4.1
Placebo + Pioglitazone 306.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 300.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 300.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 450.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-3.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-6.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio

"The ratio of proinsulin to insulin was calculated as proinsulin (pmol/L) / insulin (μIU/mL).~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline proinsulin/insulin ratio as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.005
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.025
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.045
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.007
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.086
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.077
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.036
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.054
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-0.072
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-0.013
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-0.098
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.093

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline LDL cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo9.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo2.1
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo3.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 157.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 151.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 305.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 302.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 302.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 454.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 452.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-3.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Insulin Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline insulin as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

InterventionµIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.46
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo1.80
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo1.69
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-1.47
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-2.21
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-2.78
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-2.74
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-3.15
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-1.20
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-2.83
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-1.96
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-3.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HDL cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.1
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 152.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 152.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 152.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 304.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 304.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 304.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 454.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 455.7
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 456.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in HbA1c

The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) at week 8. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HbA1c as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.30
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.75
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.80
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.50
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-1.01
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-1.04
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.57
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-1.05
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-1.02
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45 mg-0.76
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-1.11
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-1.20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fasting Proinsulin

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline proinsulin as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.2
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-2.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-3.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-11.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-10.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-8.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-11.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-9.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-9.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-11.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-13.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fasting Plasma Glucose

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo5.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-19.5
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-19.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-22.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-42.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-39.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-24.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-40.5
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-44.1
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-35.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-44.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-52.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in C-peptide Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline C-peptide as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.044
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.114
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.108
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.221
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.315
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.261
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.380
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.365
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-0.207
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-0.467
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-0.300
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.464

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Body Weight

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline weight as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.13
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.05
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.45
Placebo + Pioglitazone 150.32
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 150.09
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 150.22
Placebo + Pioglitazone 300.57
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 300.49
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 300.74
Placebo + Pioglitazone 450.46
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 450.43
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 450.93

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Triglyceride Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline triglycerides as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-2.2
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-25.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-21.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-35.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-51.1
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-26.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-42.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-44.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-47.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-39.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-49.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Cholesterol Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline total cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-3.8
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-3.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 152.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-2.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-10.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 303.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-7.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-2.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-1.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-3.6
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-6.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio

"The ratio of proinsulin to insulin was calculated as proinsulin (pmol/L) / insulin (μIU/mL).~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline proinsulin/insulin ratio as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.015
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.039
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.058
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.029
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.054
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.054
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.023
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.068
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-0.045
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-0.009
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-0.111
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.072

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline LDL cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-2.4
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo1.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 152.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 151.6
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-2.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 303.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-2.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 300.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 453.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-0.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-3.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Insulin Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline insulin as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionµIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.06
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.33
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo2.31
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-1.68
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-3.03
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-1.86
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-2.43
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-1.45
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-2.05
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-2.76
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-1.85
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-2.65

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HDL cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.6
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.5
Placebo + Pioglitazone 152.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 151.6
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 151.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 303.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 302.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 303.5
Placebo + Pioglitazone 453.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 454.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 455.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in HbA1c

The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) at week 4. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HbA1c as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.22
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.46
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.51
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.32
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.53
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.61
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.24
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.60
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-0.60
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-0.40
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-0.58
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.63

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fasting Proinsulin

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline proinsulin as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-4.7
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-2.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-4.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-9.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-8.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-6.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-9.6
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-9.5
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-7.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-11.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-11.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fasting Plasma Glucose

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-20.4
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-22.8
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-20.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-35.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-37.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-13.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-37.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-36.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-26.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-37.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-46.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in C-peptide Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline C-peptide as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.002
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.032
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.076
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.246
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.248
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.238
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.232
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.259
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-0.268
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-0.393
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-0.252
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.337

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in VLDL / Chylomicron Triglycerides

The change from Baseline in VLDL/chylomicron triglyceride levels was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR VLDL/chylomicron triglycerides as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo11.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo8.3
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-7.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-20.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-20.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-23.8
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-8.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-23.5
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-18.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-10.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-32.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-26.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Triglyceride Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline triglycerides as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-1.1
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-15.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-29.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-37.7
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-38.5
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-27.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-37.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-33.5
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-32.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-49.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-50.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Total Cholesterol Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline total cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo4.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo2.2
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 155.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 154.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 153.5
Placebo + Pioglitazone 308.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 302.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 303.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 459.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 456.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 455.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio

"The ratio of proinsulin to insulin was calculated as proinsulin (pmol/L) / insulin (μIU/mL).~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline proinsulin/insulin ratio as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.007
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.001
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.064
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.038
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.071
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.063
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.030
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.081
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-0.072
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-0.014
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-0.109
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.092

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline PAI-1 as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-3.00
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.57
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-3.29
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-5.43
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-4.75
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-9.62
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-5.24
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 301.89
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-6.66
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-3.02
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-5.22
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-11.48

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in NMR Lipid Fractionation Total Triglycerides

"NMR lipid fractionation was used to assess the change from Baseline in total triglyceride levels at Week 26.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR total triglycerides as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo12.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo7.3
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-6.8
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-18.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-20.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-23.1
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-6.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-23.5
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-19.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-8.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-32.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-25.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean VLDL Particle Size

"The change from Baseline in mean VLDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean VLDL particle size as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.26
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.52
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.35
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-2.99
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-2.66
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-2.36
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-2.88
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-3.69
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-3.30
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-1.60
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-4.65
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-4.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean LDL Particle Size

"The change from Baseline in mean LDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean LDL particle size as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.06
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.01
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.07
Placebo + Pioglitazone 150.26
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 150.38
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 150.41
Placebo + Pioglitazone 300.38
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 300.48
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 300.57
Placebo + Pioglitazone 450.59
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 450.55
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 450.63

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein A1

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein A1 as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-4.4
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-3.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 150.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-1.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 151.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 303.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 300.7
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 300.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-0.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 451.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-1.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Apolipoprotein C-III

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein C-III as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.5
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.6
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 300.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-0.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 450.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-0.7
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein A2

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein A2 as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.1
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 152.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 151.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 151.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 303.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 302.5
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 301.8
Placebo + Pioglitazone 453.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 453.7
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 453.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in Fasting Plasma Glucose

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 1

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-14.5
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-18.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-6.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-21.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-20.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 300.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-23.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-23.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-6.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-23.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-25.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Adiponectin

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline adiponectin as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionμg/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.02
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.44
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.22
Placebo + Pioglitazone 153.54
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 153.78
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 152.91
Placebo + Pioglitazone 306.07
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 306.31
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 307.13
Placebo + Pioglitazone 458.47
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 459.42
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 459.46

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in VLDL Particles

"The change from Baseline in levels of medium VLDL particles and small VLDL particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR VLDL particles as continuous covariates" (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Medium ParticlesSmall Particles
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-1.78-0.19
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-2.174.07
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-5.096.77
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.85-0.87
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-5.421.90
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-4.385.45
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-4.838.33
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-2.94-2.91
Placebo1.540.26
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-4.432.83
Placebo + Pioglitazone 300.284.16
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-2.70-0.08

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in VLDL / Chylomicron Particles

"The change from Baseline in levels of total VLDL/chylomicron particles and large VLDL/chylomicron particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR VLDL/chylomicron particles as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Total ParticlesLarge Particles
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-3.31-1.71
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.59-2.24
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-1.70-2.80
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.590.94
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-5.15-1.80
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-0.35-1.79
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 451.56-2.36
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-5.79-0.14
Placebo2.801.31
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-2.99-1.56
Placebo + Pioglitazone 303.68-0.90
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-3.83-0.67

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in LDL Particles

"The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium-small, total small and very small LDL particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR LDL particles as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Total ParticlesLarge ParticlesMedium-Small ParticlesTotal Small ParticlesVery Small Particles
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-115.163.2-29.9-175.1-145.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-158.996.6-47.4-248.7-201.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-164.6121.9-57.6-281.1-223.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-14.5-12.30.02.22.5
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-119.493.1-36.2-211.5-174.5
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-209.4102.7-55.0-304.9-250.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-219.9122.7-57.8-341.3-283.9
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-30.815.3-6.9-42.9-36.6
Placebo15.0-23.89.132.424.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-46.370.5-25.8-122.5-96.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-68.679.3-30.0-154.9-124.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-119.7137.7-47.1-256.9-209.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in HDL Particles

"The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium and small HDL particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR HDL particles as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionμmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Total ParticlesLarge ParticlesMedium ParticlesSmall Particles
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 150.770.550.86-0.68
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 301.151.131.47-1.47
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 451.611.020.96-0.40
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.43-0.160.160.41
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 151.310.750.67-0.17
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 300.261.341.69-2.77
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 450.770.952.01-2.24
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo1.030.390.540.10
Placebo0.180.020.130.00
Placebo + Pioglitazone 150.370.530.81-0.78
Placebo + Pioglitazone 300.670.641.48-1.35
Placebo + Pioglitazone 450.831.261.71-2.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in VLDL Particles

"The change from Baseline in levels of medium VLDL particles and small VLDL particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR VLDL particles as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Medium ParticlesSmall Particles
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-3.161.16
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-6.701.15
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-6.381.80
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-1.130.39
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-6.512.60
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-7.052.51
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-8.500.73
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-2.88-2.30
Placebo2.132.76
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-2.255.99
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-2.594.39
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-8.642.22

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in VLDL / Chylomicron Particles

"The change from Baseline in levels of total VLDL/chylomicron particles and large VLDL/chylomicron particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR VLDL/chylomicron particles as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Total ParticlesLarge Particles
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-3.46-1.63
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-7.82-2.19
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-7.99-2.81
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-1.59-0.42
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-5.57-1.81
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-6.54-2.29
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-9.76-2.45
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-5.32-0.27
Placebo5.821.12
Placebo + Pioglitazone 152.52-1.20
Placebo + Pioglitazone 300.45-1.69
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-8.58-1.97

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in LDL Particles

"The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium-small, total small and very small LDL particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR LDL particles as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Total ParticlesLarge ParticlesMedium-Small ParticlesTotal Small ParticlesVery Small Particles
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-143.573.8-41.1-211.0-170.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-195.8126.2-58.2-313.7-255.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-202.2135.2-66.8-337.9-271.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-39.121.1-7.7-52.0-44.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-175.685.7-48.0-256.3-207.6
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-248.8105.7-64.1-345.4-281.5
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-285.8116.1-68.2-392.7-325.0
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-69.9-8.0-5.1-56.5-51.9
Placebo52.04.79.445.136.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-48.856.2-20.3-109.9-89.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-96.283.9-34.4-184.1-149.8
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-167.0116.9-55.4-280.4-225.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in HDL Particles

"The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium and small HDL particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR HDL particles as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionμmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Total ParticlesLarge ParticlesMedium ParticlesSmall Particles
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 150.370.241.15-1.09
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 300.750.950.97-1.18
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 450.631.171.30-1.84
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.06-0.29-0.240.43
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 150.550.500.65-0.63
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 300.151.121.89-2.82
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 450.601.062.31-2.84
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.16-0.10-0.010.27
Placebo-0.08-0.210.17-0.07
Placebo + Pioglitazone 150.900.530.81-0.25
Placebo + Pioglitazone 301.291.091.21-0.92
Placebo + Pioglitazone 450.401.062.06-2.82

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in VLDL Particles Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"The change from Baseline in levels of medium VLDL particles and small VLDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR VLDL particles as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26

,,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Medium Particles - Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Medium Particles - Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)Small Particles - Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Small Particles - Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-5.36-3.021.333.55
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-7.30-4.881.915.22
Pioglitazone Alone-4.44-2.284.162.30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in VLDL / Chylomicron Triglycerides Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"The change from Baseline in levels of VLDL/chylomicron triglycerides was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR VLDL/chylomicron triglycerides as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-28.5-25.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-30.3-23.0
Pioglitazone Alone-20.4-13.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) / Chylomicron Particles Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"The change from Baseline in levels of total VLDL/chylomicron particles and large VLDL/chylomicron particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR VLDL/chylomicron particles as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26

,,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Total Particles - Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Total Particles - Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)Large Particles - Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Large Particles - Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-6.40-1.87-2.20-2.25
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-7.26-1.31-2.17-1.98
Pioglitazone Alone-1.85-1.05-1.61-1.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Triglycerides Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

Change from Baseline in triglycerides was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline triglycerides as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=345, 354, 348)Week 8 (n=374, 380, 376)Week 12 (n=374, 380, 376)Week 16 (n=374, 380, 376)Week 20 (n=374, 380, 376)Week 26 (n=374, 380, 376)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-38.9-44.4-47.5-49.3-43.6-41.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-48.0-47.9-49.4-46.3-42.7-40.7
Pioglitazone Alone-31.5-34.7-34.5-29.4-34.9-29.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

Change from Baseline in total cholesterol was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline total cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=345, 354, 348)Week 8 (n=374, 380, 376)Week 12 (n=374, 380, 376)Week 16 (n=374, 380, 376)Week 20 (n=374, 380, 376)Week 26 (n=374, 380, 376)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-4.3-1.81.31.23.04.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-6.5-3.3-1.70.11.53.9
Pioglitazone Alone1.64.86.66.55.98.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"The ratio of proinsulin to insulin was calculated as proinsulin (pmol/L) / insulin (μIU/mL) at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26 relative to the Baseline value.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline proinsulin/insulin ratio as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,
Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=325, 315, 326)Week 8 (n=355, 344, 356)Week 12 (n=355, 345, 356)Week 16 (n=356, 346, 356)Week 20 (n=356, 347, 357)Week 26 (n=356, 347, 357)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-0.078-0.079-0.086-0.091-0.088-0.087
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-0.057-0.081-0.082-0.077-0.078-0.076
Pioglitazone Alone-0.021-0.019-0.042-0.033-0.034-0.027

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"Change from Baseline in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline PAI-1 as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,
Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=311, 333, 328)Week 26 (n=341, 354, 348)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-8.76-2.69
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-8.57-9.25
Pioglitazone Alone-4.14-4.56

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Lipid Fractionation Total Triglycerides Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) lipid fractionation was used to assess the change from Baseline in total triglyceride levels at Weeks 12 and 26.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR total triglycerides as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-28.8-25.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-31.5-22.9
Pioglitazone Alone-19.6-11.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean VLDL Particle Size Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"The change from Baseline in mean VLDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean VLDL particle size as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26

,,
Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=332, 344, 343)Week 26 (n=348, 358, 357)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-2.98-3.67
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-3.02-3.26
Pioglitazone Alone-2.77-2.49

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean LDL Particle Size Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"The change from Baseline in mean LDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean LDL particle size as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26

,,
Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone0.580.47
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone0.610.54
Pioglitazone Alone0.430.41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean HDL Particle Size Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"The change from Baseline in mean HDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean HDL particle size as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26

,,
Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone0.130.12
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone0.160.17
Pioglitazone Alone0.110.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"Change from Baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline LDL cholesterol as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=330, 336, 338)Week 8 (n=365, 365, 365)Week 12 (n=365, 367, 366)Week 16 (n=365, 368, 366)Week 20 (n=365, 368, 366)Week 26 (n=365, 368, 366)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-0.51.33.33.34.25.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-1.90.11.52.43.05.6
Pioglitazone Alone3.15.96.96.16.97.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Particles Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium-small, total small and very small LDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR LDL particles as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26

,,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Total Particles - Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Total Particles - Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)Large Particles - Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Large Particles - Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)Medium-Small Particles - Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Medium-Small Particles - Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)Total Small Particles - Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Total Small Particles - Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)Very Small Particles - Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Very Small Particles - Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-180.5-146.2111.693.9-55.3-44.9-287.5-235.0-232.3-190.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-236.8-182.9102.3106.1-60.1-49.6-331.4-285.9-271.3-236.2
Pioglitazone Alone-104.1-78.285.595.8-36.6-34.3-191.4-178.1-154.6-143.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Intermediate Density Lipoprotein (IDL) Particles Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"The change from Baseline in levels of IDL particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR IDL particles as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26

,,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-3.9-4.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-5.7-1.5
Pioglitazone Alone0.42.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Insulin Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

The change from Baseline in fasting insulin was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline insulin as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,
InterventionµIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=325, 318, 326)Week 8 (n=355, 346, 356)Week 12 (n=355, 347, 356)Week 16 (n=356, 348, 356)Week 20 (n=356, 349, 357)Week 26 (n=356, 349, 357)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-2.11-2.44-1.73-2.60-1.91-2.05
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-2.19-2.36-2.62-2.48-2.06-1.66
Pioglitazone Alone-2.29-2.35-2.62-2.19-2.35-1.74

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Homeostatic Model Assessment Beta Cell Function (Grouped Analysis)

"The homeostatic model assessment estimates steady state beta cell function as a percentage of a normal reference population (%B).~HOMA %B = 20 * insulin (µIU/mL) / fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) - 3.5.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HOMA beta cell function as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26

,,
Interventionpercentage beta cell function (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=347, 344, 350)Week 26 (n=348, 346, 351)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone23.79918.173
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone19.47722.182
Pioglitazone Alone2.5915.060

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"Change from Baseline in high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline hsCRP as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,
Interventionmg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=346, 356, 355)Week 26 (n=359, 369, 363)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-2.4653-1.7716
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-1.9208-0.9977
Pioglitazone Alone-2.0274-0.8889

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"Change from Baseline in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HDL cholesterol as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=345, 353, 348)Week 8 (n=374, 380, 376)Week 12 (n=374, 380, 376)Week 16 (n=374, 380, 376)Week 20 (n=374, 380, 376)Week 26 (n=374, 380, 376)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone2.74.15.35.25.75.5
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone3.44.65.15.05.25.0
Pioglitazone Alone3.04.05.45.25.25.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Particles Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium and small HDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR HDL particles as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,
InterventionμMOL/L (Least Squares Mean)
Total Particles - Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Total Particles - Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)Large Particles - Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Large Particles - Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)Medium Particles - Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Medium Particles - Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)Small Particles - Week 12 (n=332, 345, 343)Small Particles - Week 26 (n=348, 359, 357)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone0.581.180.780.901.161.10-1.39-0.85
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone0.430.780.891.011.631.46-2.12-1.73
Pioglitazone Alone0.860.620.890.811.381.34-1.35-1.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"The change from Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound).~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and HbA1c as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20.

,,
Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=345, 359, 346)Week 8 (n=376, 385, 377)Week 12 (n=376, 385, 377)Week 16 (n=376, 385, 377)Week 20 (n=376, 385, 377)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-0.57-1.06-1.29-1.44-1.46
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-0.61-1.09-1.38-1.49-1.51
Pioglitazone Alone-0.32-0.61-0.81-0.92-0.92

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Free Fatty Acids Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

Change from Baseline in free fatty acids (FFA) was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline free fatty acid as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=339, 356, 352)Week 26 (n=353, 368, 363)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-0.1306-0.0945
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-0.1273-0.1144
Pioglitazone Alone-0.0707-0.0676

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"Proinsulin is a precursor to insulin, and was measured as an indicator of pancreatic function. The change from Baseline in fasting proinsulin was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and proinsulin as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,
Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=328, 319, 327)Week 8 (n=357, 347, 358)Week 12 (n=357, 347, 358)Week 16 (n=358, 348, 358)Week 20 (n=358, 349, 359)Week 26 (n=358, 349, 359)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-10.3-11.3-11.6-12.2-10.4-10.6
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-10.1-11.3-11.6-11.3-10.7-9.5
Pioglitazone Alone-6.2-7.2-8.2-7.2-6.6-5.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"The change from Baseline in fasting plasma glucose was assessed at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1 (n=358, 355, 354)Week 2 (n=379, 383, 381)Week 4 (n=381, 386, 383)Week 8 (n=381, 386, 383)Week 12 (n=381, 386, 383)Week 16 (n=381, 386, 383)Week 20 (n=381, 386, 383)Week 26 (n=381, 386, 383)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-22.6-30.3-36.8-42.3-45.0-43.7-43.6-45.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-23.1-31.6-39.8-45.2-47.6-45.4-45.0-44.2
Pioglitazone Alone-4.1-11.3-19.9-27.3-30.3-27.9-28.1-28.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Calculated Homeostatic Model Assessment Insulin Resistance (HOMA IR) (Grouped Analysis)

"HOMA IR measures insulin resistance based on fasting glucose and insulin measurements:~HOMA IR = fasting plasma insulin (µIU/mL) * fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) / 22.5.~A higher number indicates a greater insulin resistance. This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone.~Least Squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and HOMA-IR as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,
Interventioninsulin resistance (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=347, 344, 351)Week 26 (n=348, 346, 352)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-1.966-2.209
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-2.572-1.711
Pioglitazone Alone-1.832-1.571

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in C-peptide Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

"C-peptide is a byproduct created when the hormone insulin is produced and is measured by a blood test. Change from Baseline was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline C-peptide as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,
Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=335, 335, 336)Week 8 (n=367, 366, 371)Week 12 (n=367, 369, 374)Week 16 (n=369, 374, 374)Week 20 (n=369, 375, 375)Week 26 (n=371, 378, 375)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-0.255-0.327-0.249-0.343-0.350-0.346
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-0.282-0.311-0.334-0.333-0.293-0.326
Pioglitazone Alone-0.292-0.356-0.268-0.352-0.360-0.341

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

Change from Baseline in body weight was assessed at Weeks 8, 12, 20 and 26. This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline weight as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 8, 12, 20 and 26.

,,
Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 8 (n=361, 372, 367)Week 12 (n=368, 374, 373)Week 20 (n=368, 374, 373)Week 26 (n=368, 374, 373)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone0.340.571.451.81
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone0.630.821.461.87
Pioglitazone Alone0.450.561.211.49

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

Change from Baseline in apolipoprotein C-III was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein C-III as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=337, 352, 345)Week 26 (n=353, 366, 355)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-1.2-0.6
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-1.3-0.6
Pioglitazone Alone-0.6-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein B was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein B as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=338, 354, 346)Week 26 (n=354, 367, 356)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-7.9-6.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-10.0-6.4
Pioglitazone Alone-3.0-2.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A2 Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein A2 was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein A2 as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=339, 354, 345)Week 26 (n=354, 367, 355)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone2.52.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone2.31.8
Pioglitazone Alone3.12.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein A1 as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=339, 354, 346)Week 26 (n=354, 367, 356)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone0.2-1.5
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone0.3-2.8
Pioglitazone Alone1.4-1.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Adiponectin Over Time (Grouped Analysis)

Change from Baseline in adiponectin was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline adiponectin as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,
Interventionμg/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=339, 357, 348)Week 26 (n=356, 369, 361)
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone6.516.43
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone6.516.46
Pioglitazone Alone6.035.98

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia (Grouped Analysis)

"Marked hyperglycemia is defined as fasting plasma glucose greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL (11.10 mmol/L).~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: From Week 1 to Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pioglitazone Alone39.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone24.6
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone22.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia

Marked hyperglycemia is defined as fasting plasma glucose greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL (11.10 mmol/L). (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: From Week 1 to Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo60.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo42.6
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo39.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 1537.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 1527.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 1522.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 3039.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 3026.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 3023.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 4541.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 4520.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 4520.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7%

Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c less than or equal to 7%. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo6.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo22.7
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo27.1
Placebo + Pioglitazone 1525.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 1549.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 1554.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 3029.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 3053.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 3053.1
Placebo + Pioglitazone 4536.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 4561.5
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 4560.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7.5% (Grouped Analysis)

"Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c less than or equal to 7.5%.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pioglitazone Alone54.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone77.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone74.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7.5%

Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c less than or equal to 7.5%. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo24.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo38.3
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo55.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 1551.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 1577.7
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 1571.5
Placebo + Pioglitazone 3055.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 3073.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 3072.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 4556.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 4580.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 4578.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean HDL Particle Size

The change from Baseline in mean HDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation. Least squares means are from are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean HDL particle size as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.03
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.00
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.07
Placebo + Pioglitazone 150.06
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 150.06
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 150.11
Placebo + Pioglitazone 300.10
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 300.15
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 300.20
Placebo + Pioglitazone 450.19
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 450.16
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 450.19

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline LDL cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo2.8
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo3.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 157.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 153.7
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 156.1
Placebo + Pioglitazone 306.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 302.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 303.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 458.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 459.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 457.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Insulin Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline insulin as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionµIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo6.78
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo1.33
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo1.43
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.78
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-3.05
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.76
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-2.56
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.76
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-1.42
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-1.88
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-2.33
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-2.79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in IDL Particles

"The change from Baseline in levels of IDL particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR IDL particles as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo5.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-7.3
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-3.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 155.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-2.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 150.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 303.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-5.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-5.5
Placebo + Pioglitazone 450.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-5.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 451.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline hsCRP as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.0550
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.6606
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.2618
Placebo + Pioglitazone 150.2375
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-1.2490
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.9438
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-1.0480
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-1.1725
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 300.1697
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-1.8562
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-2.8933
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-2.2191

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HDL cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.6
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo1.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 153.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 154.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 154.1
Placebo + Pioglitazone 305.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 306.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 305.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 456.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 456.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 456.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7.0% (Grouped Analysis)

"Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c less than or equal to 7%.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pioglitazone Alone30.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone54.6
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone55.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 6.5% (Grouped Analysis)

"Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c less than or equal to 6.5%.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pioglitazone Alone12.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone27.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone29.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 6.5%

Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c less than or equal to 6.5%. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo0.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo8.6
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo12.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 156.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 1521.5
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 1524.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 3011.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 3030.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 3030.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 4519.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 4532.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 4533.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 2%

Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 2%. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo1.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo7.8
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo11.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 157.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 1523.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 1521.5
Placebo + Pioglitazone 309.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 3022.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 3026.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 4517.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 4530.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 4535.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 2.0% (Grouped Analysis)

"Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 2.0%.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pioglitazone Alone11.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone25.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone27.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 1% (Grouped Analysis)

"Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 1%.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pioglitazone Alone45.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone71.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone69.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 1%

Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 1%. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo16.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo33.6
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo47.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 1536.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 1569.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 1566.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 3046.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 3073.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 3069.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 4554.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 4573.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 4572.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 1.5% (Grouped Analysis)

"Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 1.5%.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pioglitazone Alone27.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone45.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone50.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 1.5%

Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 1.5%. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo5.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo15.6
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo28.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 1521.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 1541.5
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 1546.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 3027.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 3045.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 3046.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 4534.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 4550.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 4558.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 0.5% (Grouped Analysis)

"Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 0.5%.~This analysis compared the groupings of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pioglitazone Alone67.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone85.6
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone83.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in HbA1c

The change from Baseline to Week 26 in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound). (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.13
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.64
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.90
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.75
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-1.34
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-1.27
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.92
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-1.39
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-1.39
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-1.00
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-1.55
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-1.60

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (Grouped Analysis)

"The change from Baseline to Week 26 in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound).~The primary analysis compared the groupings (combinations of individual treatment groups) of participants who received the combination of pioglitazone with each dose of alogliptin with the grouping of participants who received pioglitazone alone (Pioglitazone Alone)." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone Alone-0.89
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone-1.43
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone-1.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Free Fatty Acids

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline free fatty acid as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.0387
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.0427
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.0386
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.0561
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.0752
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.0972
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.0737
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.0956
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-0.1232
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-0.0730
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-0.1125
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.1228

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Fasting Proinsulin

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline proinsulin as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.7
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-3.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-3.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-10.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-7.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-8.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-8.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-8.8
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-4.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-12.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-12.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Fasting Plasma Glucose

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo6.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-13.2
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-18.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-23.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-42.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-38.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-28.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-42.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-41.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-32.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-51.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-52.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Calculated HOMA Insulin Resistance

"The Homeostasis Model Assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA IR) measures insulin resistance based on fasting glucose and insulin measurements:~HOMA IR = fasting plasma insulin (µIU/mL) * fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) / 22.5.~A higher number indicates a greater degree of insulin resistance. Least Squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and HOMA-IR as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventioninsulin resistance (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.464
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.311
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.179
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.864
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-2.300
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.223
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-2.061
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-1.871
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-2.056
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-1.789
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-2.456
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-2.854

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Calculated HOMA Beta-cell Function

"The Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) estimates steady state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population.~HOMA %B = 20 * insulin (µIU/mL) / fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) - 3.5. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HOMA beta cell function as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionpercentage beta cell function (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.924
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo11.812
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo17.814
Placebo + Pioglitazone 152.770
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 1510.977
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 1519.320
Placebo + Pioglitazone 308.983
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 3022.474
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 3023.475
Placebo + Pioglitazone 453.427
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 4521.068
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 4523.752

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in C-peptide Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline C-peptide as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.011
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.000
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.059
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.239
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.380
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.204
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.353
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.235
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-0.300
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-0.429
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-0.421
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.474

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Body Weight

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline weight as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.66
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.02
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.67
Placebo + Pioglitazone 150.94
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 151.25
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 151.27
Placebo + Pioglitazone 301.88
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 301.89
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 302.10
Placebo + Pioglitazone 451.65
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 452.30
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 452.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Apolipoprotein B

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein B as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.6
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-3.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-1.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-6.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-4.8
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-3.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-7.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-8.8
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-3.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-6.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-5.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Apolipoprotein A2

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein A2 as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.2
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 151.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 151.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 151.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 302.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 302.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 301.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 452.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 453.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 452.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Apolipoprotein A1

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein A1 as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-3.0
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-4.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-3.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-3.5
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-2.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-3.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-1.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-1.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-2.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Adiponectin

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline adiponectin as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionμg/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.43
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.48
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.26
Placebo + Pioglitazone 153.30
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 154.80
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 152.93
Placebo + Pioglitazone 305.90
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 306.30
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 306.87
Placebo + Pioglitazone 458.75
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 458.18
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 459.59

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Triglyceride Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline triglycerides as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo5.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-7.0
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-23.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-18.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-41.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-34.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-37.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-43.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-42.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-49.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-46.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-51.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Total Cholesterol Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline total cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo6.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo1.8
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-1.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 156.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 154.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 151.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 307.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 301.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 303.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 454.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 454.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio

"The ratio of proinsulin to insulin was calculated as proinsulin (pmol/L) / insulin (μIU/mL).~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline proinsulin/insulin ratio as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.007
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.014
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.046
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.039
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.081
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.065
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.042
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.085
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-0.077
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-0.020
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-0.099
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.092

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline LDL cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo6.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo2.9
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo1.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 157.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 154.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 153.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 306.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 302.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 304.1
Placebo + Pioglitazone 456.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 456.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 451.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Insulin Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline insulin as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20

InterventionµIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.18
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo2.03
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.76
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.66
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-2.35
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.90
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-3.29
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-2.20
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-2.29
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-3.12
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-1.16
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-3.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 20 in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HDL cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.9
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.5
Placebo + Pioglitazone 153.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 154.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 153.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 305.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 305.7
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 305.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 455.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 457.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 456.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 20 in HbA1c

"The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) at week 20.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HbA1c as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.24
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.75
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.99
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.75
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-1.39
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-1.37
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.90
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-1.43
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-1.49
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45 mg-1.10
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-1.57
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-1.66

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Fasting Proinsulin

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline proinsulin as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20

Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo1.5
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-3.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-3.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-11.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-8.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-9.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-10.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-10.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-7.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-10.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-12.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Fasting Plasma Glucose

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo6.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-8.7
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-23.5
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-22.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-43.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-39.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-26.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-41.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-43.1
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-35.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-46.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-52.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 20 in C-peptide Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline C-peptide as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.046
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.114
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.019
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.193
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.377
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.184
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.380
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.343
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-0.266
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-0.506
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-0.329
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.430

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Body Weight

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline weight as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.55
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.08
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.48
Placebo + Pioglitazone 150.76
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 150.96
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 150.85
Placebo + Pioglitazone 301.51
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 301.45
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 301.76
Placebo + Pioglitazone 451.35
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 451.93
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 451.76

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Fasting Plasma Glucose

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo4.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-21.9
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-18.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-10.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-30.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-31.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-4.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-30.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-31.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-19.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-30.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-31.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Triglyceride Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline triglycerides as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo10.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-7.5
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-26.8
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-10.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-53.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-33.8
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-28.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-44.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-45.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-49.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-50.7
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-59.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Total Cholesterol Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline total cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo5.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.5
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-2.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 157.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 153.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 3010.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 300.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-1.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 452.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 452.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-1.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio

"The ratio of proinsulin to insulin was calculated as proinsulin (pmol/L) / insulin (μIU/mL).~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline proinsulin/insulin ratio as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.026
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.036
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.046
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.035
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.078
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.066
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.035
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.094
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-0.061
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-0.030
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-0.102
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.104

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline LDL cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo4.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo1.3
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 157.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 152.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 154.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 307.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 302.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 300.8
Placebo + Pioglitazone 454.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 454.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 451.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Insulin Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline insulin as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

InterventionµIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.34
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo1.22
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo1.83
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.63
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-2.28
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-1.11
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-3.46
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-2.50
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-2.82
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-2.48
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-3.00
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-3.52

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HDL cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.4
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 153.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 154.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 154.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 305.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 305.5
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 304.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 455.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 456.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 456.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in HbA1c

The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) at week 16. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HbA1c as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.27
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.82
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-1.03
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.74
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-1.36
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-1.36
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.91
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-1.42
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-1.45
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45 mg-1.12
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-1.53
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-1.66

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Fasting Proinsulin

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline proinsulin as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-3.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.0
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-2.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-3.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-11.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-8.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-10.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-12.6
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-11.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-8.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-13.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-14.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Fasting Plasma Glucose

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-16.2
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-22.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-21.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-41.6
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-39.1
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-26.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-41.5
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-43.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-36.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-47.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-53.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in C-peptide Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline C-peptide as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.076
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.032
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.101
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.242
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.282
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.184
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.410
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.318
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-0.306
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-0.404
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-0.431
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.510

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in VLDL / Chylomicron Triglycerides

The change from Baseline in VLDL/chylomicron triglyceride levels was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR VLDL/chylomicron triglycerides as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo19.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-3.5
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-6.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-14.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-21.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-26.5
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-19.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-29.5
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-30.1
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-28.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-35.5
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-34.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Triglyceride Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline triglycerides as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo18.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-4.3
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-18.1
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-24.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-37.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-44.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-37.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-47.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-46.8
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-42.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-57.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-57.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline total cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo7.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.4
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.1
Placebo + Pioglitazone 158.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 151.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 307.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 300.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-1.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 453.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 451.7
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-3.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio

"The ratio of proinsulin to insulin was calculated as proinsulin (pmol/L) / insulin (μIU/mL).~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline proinsulin/insulin ratio as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.006
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.024
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.041
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.041
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.073
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.056
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.063
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.072
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-0.088
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-0.021
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-0.112
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.101

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline PAI-1 as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.55
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo3.54
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-1.80
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-5.32
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-6.28
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-10.94
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-8.53
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-10.47
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-1.71
Placebo + Pioglitazone 451.85
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-9.13
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-12.63

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in NMR Lipid Fractionation Total Triglycerides

"NMR lipid fractionation was used to assess the change from Baseline in total triglyceride levels at Week 12.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR total triglycerides as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo20.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-4.9
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-7.8
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-12.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-21.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-27.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-18.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-29.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-31.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-27.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-35.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-36.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean VLDL Particle Size

"The change from Baseline in mean VLDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean VLDL particle size as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.65
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.12
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.18
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-2.81
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-2.10
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-2.56
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-3.16
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-2.88
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-2.49
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-2.37
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-4.00
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-4.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean LDL Particle Size

"The change from Baseline in mean LDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean LDL particle size as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.05
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.13
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.06
Placebo + Pioglitazone 150.25
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 150.43
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 150.49
Placebo + Pioglitazone 300.44
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 300.61
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 300.61
Placebo + Pioglitazone 450.58
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 450.68
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 450.73

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean HDL Particle Size

The change from Baseline in mean HDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation. Least squares means are from are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean HDL particle size as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.00
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.00
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.00
Placebo + Pioglitazone 150.06
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 150.07
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 150.09
Placebo + Pioglitazone 300.10
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 300.15
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 300.17
Placebo + Pioglitazone 450.18
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 450.17
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 450.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline LDL cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo6.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo1.9
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo3.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 158.9
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 153.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 153.8
Placebo + Pioglitazone 306.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 301.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 300.9
Placebo + Pioglitazone 455.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 454.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Insulin Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline insulin as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionµIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.06
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo1.79
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo1.93
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-1.29
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-1.47
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-2.01
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-3.61
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-1.36
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-2.83
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-2.95
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-2.35
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-3.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in IDL Particles

"The change from Baseline in levels of IDL particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR IDL particles as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-11.1
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-6.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 155.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-6.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-2.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-2.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-6.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-8.1
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-1.5
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 450.7
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-6.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline hsCRP as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionmg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.1053
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-1.0730
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.3516
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.9166
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-2.2362
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-2.4217
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-2.7023
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-2.2143
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-1.0006
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-2.4212
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-2.9032
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-2.2978

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HDL cholesterol as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.0
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 153.8
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 153.7
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 153.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 306.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 305.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 305.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 456.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 456.3
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 456.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in HbA1c

"The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) at week 12.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HbA1c as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.28
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.84
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.92
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.65
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-1.24
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-1.26
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.77
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-1.29
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-1.33
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45 mg-1.02
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-1.34
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-1.53

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Free Fatty Acids

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline free fatty acid as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.0067
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.0149
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.0769
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.0879
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.1305
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.1291
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.0395
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.1167
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-0.1126
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-0.0848
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-0.1447
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.1401

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Proinsulin

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline proinsulin as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.7
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-2.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-5.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-10.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-8.8
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-11.2
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-12.1
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-12.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-8.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-12.7
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-13.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Plasma Glucose

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.4
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-19.3
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-23.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-23.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-42.9
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-42.5
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-26.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-42.8
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-49.0
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-41.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-49.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-51.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Calculated HOMA Insulin Resistance

"The Homeostasis Model Assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA IR) measures insulin resistance based on fasting glucose and insulin measurements:~HOMA IR = fasting plasma insulin (µIU/mL) * fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) / 22.5.~A higher number indicates a greater degree of insulin resistance. Least Squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and HOMA-IR as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventioninsulin resistance (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.337
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.063
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.041
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-1.012
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-1.819
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-2.305
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-2.278
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-1.457
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-2.665
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-2.202
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-2.615
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-2.742

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Calculated HOMA Beta-cell Function

"The Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) estimates steady state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population.~HOMA %B = 20 * insulin (µIU/mL) / fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) - 3.5. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HOMA beta cell function as continuous covariates." (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercentage beta cell function (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-3.027
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo16.304
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo22.996
Placebo + Pioglitazone 152.565
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 1530.346
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 1519.887
Placebo + Pioglitazone 301.118
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 3021.045
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 3019.935
Placebo + Pioglitazone 454.023
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 4519.938
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 4518.541

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in C-peptide Levels

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline C-peptide as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.055
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo0.083
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo0.140
Placebo + Pioglitazone 150.116
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-0.155
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-0.215
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.439
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-0.212
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-0.326
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-0.483
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-0.381
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-0.464

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Body Weight

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline weight as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.46
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.14
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.56
Placebo + Pioglitazone 150.39
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 150.22
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 150.39
Placebo + Pioglitazone 300.75
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 300.60
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 300.98
Placebo + Pioglitazone 450.55
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 450.88
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 451.08

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein C-III

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein C-III as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.7
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-0.4
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-0.7
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-1.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-1.4
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-0.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-1.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-1.3
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-1.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-1.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-1.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein B

Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein B as continuous covariates. (NCT00328627)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo5.0
Alogliptin 12.5 + Placebo-2.3
Alogliptin 25 + Placebo-3.6
Placebo + Pioglitazone 15-0.3
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 15-7.2
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 15-6.1
Placebo + Pioglitazone 30-2.1
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 30-8.4
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 30-12.2
Placebo + Pioglitazone 45-6.6
Alogliptin 12.5 + Pioglitazone 45-8.0
Alogliptin 25 + Pioglitazone 45-11.7

[back to top]

Cholesterol Levels

(NCT00362440)
Timeframe: At the end of each 3 month intervention

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Leptin190
Pioglitazone or Metformin183

[back to top]

Body Composition (Fat Mass)

(NCT00362440)
Timeframe: At the end of each 3 month intervention

Interventionkg (Mean)
Leptin16.7
Pioglitazone or Metformin13.1

[back to top]

Insulin Resistance (HOMA Index)

(NCT00362440)
Timeframe: At the end of each 3 month intervention

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Leptin1.6
Pioglitazone or Metformin1.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c ) at Week 52

Change from the last value before receiving sitagliptin therapy: Week 0 for Sitagliptin/Sitagliptin group and Week 12 for the Placebo/Sitagliptin group. (NCT00372060)
Timeframe: Week 52 (reflecting change from Week 0) for Sitagliptin/Sitagliptin group; Weeks 52 (reflecting change from Week 12) for Placebo/Sitagliptin group.

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Sitagliptin / Sitagliptin-0.6
Placebo / Sitagliptin-0.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2 Hour Postprandial Glucose at Week 12

Change from baseline measurement, where the baseline measurement was obtained at randomization (0 week) before receiving study medication. (NCT00372060)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin / Sitagliptin-42.7
Placebo / Sitagliptin6.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 12

Change from baseline measurement, where the baseline measurement was obtained at randomization (0 week) before receiving study medication. (NCT00372060)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin / Sitagliptin-12.2
Placebo / Sitagliptin4.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c ) at Week 12

Change from the baseline measurement, where the baseline measurement was obtained at randomization (0 week) before receiving study medication. (NCT00372060)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin / Sitagliptin-0.4
Placebo / Sitagliptin0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Homeostatic Model Assessment Beta Cell Function

"The Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) estimates steady state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population.~HOMA %B = 20 * insulin (µIU/mL) / fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) - 3.5~The change from Baseline in the homeostasis model assessment of beta cell function was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline HOMA beta cell function as a covariate." (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionpercentage beta cell function (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n= 139, 132, 137, 143)Week 26 (n=145, 134, 144, 148)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg22.13424.887
Alogliptin 25 mg15.13310.472
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg30.26639.153
Pioglitazone 30 mg17.32817.500

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Insulin

The change from Baseline in fasting insulin was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline insulin as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,,
InterventionμIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=135, 133, 133, 145)Week 8 (n=150, 142, 147, 155)Week 12 (n=150, 142, 148, 155)Week 16 (n=150, 142, 148, 155)Week 20 (n=150, 142, 148, 155)Week 26 (n=150, 142, 148, 155)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-4.27-4.86-4.65-2.73-3.06-3.72
Alogliptin 25 mg0.430.930.290.26-1.02-0.47
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-4.67-4.75-2.98-3.65-4.61-3.86
Pioglitazone 30 mg-4.74-4.41-4.08-4.49-4.56-4.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Adiponectin

Change from Baseline in adiponectin was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline adiponectin as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionμg/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=148, 137, 141, 147)Week 26 (n=154, 137, 147, 149)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg7.507.16
Alogliptin 25 mg-0.28-0.09
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg8.106.85
Pioglitazone 30 mg6.356.90

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Intermediate Density Lipoprotein (IDL) Particles

"The change from Baseline in levels of IDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline IDL particles as a covariate." (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-4.0-5.8
Alogliptin 25 mg-2.90.5
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-2.9-1.0
Pioglitazone 30 mg-1.02.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Particles

"The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium-small, total small and very small LDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline LDL particles as a covariate." (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Total Particles - Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Total Particles - Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)Large Particles - Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Large Particles - Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)Medium-Small - Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Medium-Small - Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)Total Small - Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Total Small - Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)Very Small - Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Very Small - Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-181.8-177.1142.1155.5-65.8-66.6-320.0-327.4-254.2-260.8
Alogliptin 25 mg-11.960.915.32.6-6.29.9-27.854.5-20.945.1
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-207.0-169.9129.4146.6-65.8-63.0-331.2-313.8-265.7-250.9
Pioglitazone 30 mg-104.1-75.698.8120.4-41.4-40.1-200.3-195.8-159.2-156.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Change from Baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline LDL cholesterol as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=137, 130, 135, 142)Week 8 (n=152, 139, 147, 153)Week 12 (n=154, 140, 148, 154)Week 16 (n=154, 140, 148, 154)Week 20 (n=154, 140, 148, 154)Week 26 (n=154, 140, 148, 154)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-2.81.33.94.60.53.8
Alogliptin 25 mg-3.5-0.50.81.80.92.0
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg2.22.61.45.32.14.6
Pioglitazone 30 mg2.87.65.86.67.48.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean HDL Particle Size

Change from Baseline in mean HDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline mean HDL particle size as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg0.150.14
Alogliptin 25 mg-0.02-0.03
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg0.170.15
Pioglitazone 30 mg0.090.08

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Lipid Fractionation Total Triglycerides

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) lipid fractionation was used to assess the change from Baseline in total triglyceride levels at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline NMR total triglycerides as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-23.7-22.6
Alogliptin 25 mg-14.9-7.6
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-39.7-28.8
Pioglitazone 30 mg-25.0-20.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Less Than or Equal to 7.5%

Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c ≤ 7.5%. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alogliptin 25 mg44.5
Pioglitazone 30 mg55.8
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg72.0
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg72.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

The change from Baseline to Week 26 in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound). (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Alogliptin 25 mg-0.96
Pioglitazone 30 mg-1.15
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-1.71
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-1.56

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 0.5%

Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of ≥ 0.5%. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alogliptin 25 mg66.5
Pioglitazone 30 mg70.6
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg89.6
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg85.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 1.0%

Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of ≥ 1%. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alogliptin 25 mg43.3
Pioglitazone 30 mg54.6
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg75.6
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg68.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 1.5%.

Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of ≥ 1.5%. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alogliptin 25 mg29.3
Pioglitazone 30 mg33.1
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg57.3
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg50.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 2.0%

Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of ≥ 2.0%. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alogliptin 25 mg17.7
Pioglitazone 30 mg19.6
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg34.1
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg33.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Less Than or Equal to 6.5%

Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c ≤6.5%. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alogliptin 25 mg11.6
Pioglitazone 30 mg16.6
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg27.4
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg26.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Less Than or Equal to 7.0%

Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c ≤ 7%. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alogliptin 25 mg24.4
Pioglitazone 30 mg33.7
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg62.8
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg53.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean LDL Particle Size

Change from Baseline in mean LDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline mean LDL particle size as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg0.580.61
Alogliptin 25 mg0.09-0.02
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg0.630.65
Pioglitazone 30 mg0.440.44

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean VLDL Particle Size

Change from Baseline in mean VLDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline mean VLDL particle size as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-2.85-2.80
Alogliptin 25 mg-0.970.30
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-2.92-4.21
Pioglitazone 30 mg-3.97-3.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1

Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and Baseline apolipoprotein A1 as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=140, 138, 137, 144)Week 26 (n=149, 139, 146, 146)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg1.71.6
Alogliptin 25 mg-1.6-4.5
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg1.00.8
Pioglitazone 30 mg2.31.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A2

Change from Baseline in apolipoprotein A2 was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline apolipoprotein A2 as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=140, 138, 137, 144)Week 26 (n=149, 139, 146, 146)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg3.22.6
Alogliptin 25 mg-0.1-0.3
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg2.82.5
Pioglitazone 30 mg3.42.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B

Change from Baseline in apolipoprotein B was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline apolipoprotein B as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=140, 138, 137, 143)Week 26 (n=149, 139, 146, 146)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-5.9-6.4
Alogliptin 25 mg-4.0-2.5
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-9.8-7.9
Pioglitazone 30 mg-5.0-3.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III

Change from Baseline in apolipoprotein C-III was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline apolipoprotein C-III as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=140, 138, 138, 144)Week 26 (n=149, 139, 147, 146)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.3-0.4
Alogliptin 25 mg-0.5-0.4
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.8-0.3
Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.3-0.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight

Change from Baseline in body weight was assessed at Weeks 8, 12, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and Baseline weight as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 8, 12, 20 and 26.

,,,
Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 8 (n=155, 146, 152, 151)Week 12 (n=159, 147, 155, 154)Week 20 (n=159, 147, 155, 154)Week 26 (n=159, 147, 155, 154)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg0.701.221.862.51
Alogliptin 25 mg-0.34-0.78-0.47-0.29
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg0.821.352.363.14
Pioglitazone 30 mg0.580.961.562.19

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in C-peptide Levels

C-peptide is a byproduct created when the hormone insulin is produced and is measured by a blood test. Change from Baseline was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline C-peptide as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,,
Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=142, 141, 141, 146)Week 8 (n=158, 150, 153, 156)Week 12 (n=158, 150, 154, 156)Week 16 (n=158, 150, 154, 156)Week 20 (n=158, 150, 154, 156)Week 26 (n=158, 150, 154, 156)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.452-0.547-0.536-0.353-0.374-0.444
Alogliptin 25 mg0.0570.034-0.0400.037-0.097-0.068
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.593-0.620-0.534-0.424-0.556-0.541
Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.551-0.606-0.612-0.604-0.623-0.577

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Calculated Homeostatic Model Assessment Insulin Resistance

"The Homeostasis Model Assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA IR) measures insulin resistance based on fasting glucose and insulin measurements:~HOMA IR = fasting plasma insulin (µIU/mL) * fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) / 22.5~A higher number indicates a greater degree of insulin resistance. The change from Baseline in HOMA IR was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline HOMA IR as a covariate." (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventioninsulin resistance (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=139, 132, 137, 143)Week 26 (n=145, 134, 144, 148)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-3.877-3.508
Alogliptin 25 mg-0.814-1.353
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-2.905-3.646
Pioglitazone 30 mg-3.479-3.350

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose Over Time

The change from Baseline in fasting plasma glucose was assessed at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline plasma glucose as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1 (n=148, 146, 152, 151)Week 2 (n=161, 156, 162, 159)Week 4 (n=162, 157, 162, 161)Week 8 (n=162, 157, 162, 162)Week 12 (n=162, 157, 162, 162)Week 16 (n=162, 157, 162, 162)Week 20 (n=162, 157, 162, 162)Week 26 (n=162, 157, 162, 162)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-23.3-30.9-39.7-48.4-49.3-46.6-47.5-48.5
Alogliptin 25 mg-14.6-16.7-26.7-29.0-29.5-26.9-28.3-25.8
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-26.6-33.5-41.4-50.4-51.9-52.7-54.0-50.2
Pioglitazone 30 mg-7.3-14.2-31.9-38.0-42.4-40.6-42.0-37.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin

Proinsulin is a precursor to insulin, and was measured as an indicator of pancreatic function. The change from Baseline in fasting proinsulin was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline proinsulin as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,,
Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=136, 134, 135, 145)Week 8 (n=150, 143, 146, 155)Week 12 (n=150, 143, 147, 155)Week 16 (n=150, 143, 147, 155)Week 20 (n=150, 143, 147, 155)Week 26 (n=150, 143, 147, 155)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-12.3-17.7-16.7-13.1-15.5-15.1
Alogliptin 25 mg-4.9-3.7-5.9-3.4-8.1-4.8
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-16.0-18.2-18.6-16.0-19.8-18.3
Pioglitazone 30 mg-12.1-14.9-16.0-16.3-16.1-13.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Free Fatty Acids

Change from Baseline in free fatty acids (FFA) was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline free fatty acid as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=148, 136, 140, 147)Week 26 (n=154, 136, 147, 150)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.0805-0.1013
Alogliptin 25 mg-0.0404-0.0429
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.1061-0.0881
Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.0990-0.0680

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1

Change from Baseline in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=136, 127, 131, 133)Week 26 (n=145, 129, 142, 137)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-11.87-8.38
Alogliptin 25 mg-1.581.71
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-9.63-7.14
Pioglitazone 30 mg-4.23-5.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio

The ratio of proinsulin to insulin was calculated as proinsulin (pmol/L) / insulin (μIU/mL) at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26 relative to the Baseline value. Least squares means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and Baseline proinsulin/insulin ratio as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,,
Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=135, 133, 133, 145)Week 8 (n=149, 142, 146, 155)Week 12 (n=149, 142, 147, 155)Week 16 (n=149, 142, 147, 155)Week 20 (n=149, 142, 147, 155)Week 26 (n=149, 142, 147, 155)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.056-0.102-0.095-0.090-0.119-0.102
Alogliptin 25 mg-0.073-0.041-0.062-0.049-0.057-0.051
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.080-0.094-0.123-0.115-0.124-0.107
Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.047-0.085-0.098-0.081-0.076-0.076

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol Level

Change from Baseline in total cholesterol level was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline total cholesterol as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=146, 144, 142, 149)Week 8 (n=160, 151, 154, 158)Week 12 (n=160, 151, 155, 158)Week 16 (n=160, 151, 155, 158)Week 20 (n=160, 151, 155, 158)Week 26 (n=160, 151, 155, 158)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-5.3-1.24.44.7-0.64.0
Alogliptin 25 mg-8.5-5.4-4.0-4.3-2.9-0.5
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.4-0.3-0.63.8-0.33.7
Pioglitazone 30 mg0.97.24.94.64.56.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Triglyceride Levels

Change from Baseline in triglycerides was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline triglycerides as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=146, 144, 142, 149)Week 8 (n=160, 151, 154, 158)Week 12 (n=160, 151, 155, 158)Week 16 (n=160, 151, 155, 158)Week 20 (n=160, 151, 155, 158)Week 26 (n=160, 151, 155, 158)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-32.1-51.9-45.4-43.9-46.5-43.1
Alogliptin 25 mg-28.2-34.8-36.4-44.5-29.9-24.7
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-51.7-61.6-64.3-54.6-59.3-56.2
Pioglitazone 30 mg-43.2-38.2-47.9-48.3-46.6-46.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) / Chylomicron Particles

"The change from Baseline in levels of total VLDL/chylomicron particles and large VLDL/chylomicron particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline VLDL/chylomicron particles as a covariate." (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Total Particles - Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Total Particles - Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)Large Particles - Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Large Particles - Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-2.67-1.17-2.06-2.11
Alogliptin 25 mg-6.59-4.97-0.94-0.18
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-9.63-0.73-2.63-2.37
Pioglitazone 30 mg0.704.94-1.83-1.96

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in VLDL / Chylomicron Triglycerides

"The change from Baseline in levels of VLDL/chylomicron triglycerides was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline VLDL/chylomicron triglycerides as a covariate." (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-24.2-23.3
Alogliptin 25 mg-14.4-8.2
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-39.5-29.7
Pioglitazone 30 mg-25.6-22.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c Over Time

The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) at 4 week intervals during the study. Least Squares Means were from an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20.

,,,
Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=145, 146, 144, 150)Week 8 (n=160, 153, 158, 158)Week 12 (n=160, 153, 158, 158)Week 16 (n=160, 153, 158, 158)Week 20 (n=160, 153, 158, 158)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.51-1.03-1.34-1.43-1.54
Alogliptin 25 mg-0.55-0.84-0.98-1.01-1.00
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.62-1.19-1.57-1.67-1.72
Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.30-0.72-1.04-1.17-1.20

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Meeting Rescue Criteria

"Rescue was defined as meeting 1 of the following criteria, confirmed by a 2nd sample drawn within 5 days after the first sample and analyzed by the central laboratory:~After more than 4 weeks of treatment but prior to the Week 8 Visit: a single fasting plasma glucose ≥310 mg/dL (≥17.5 mmol/L);~From the Week 8 Visit but prior to the Week 12 Visit: a single fasting plasma glucose ≥275 mg/dL (≥15.27 mmol/L);~From the Week 12 Visit through the End-of-Treatment Visit: HbA1c ≥8.5% and ≤0.5% reduction in HbA1c as compared with the Baseline HbA1c." (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4 to < Week 8 (n=160, 156, 161, 160)Week 8 to < Week 12 (n=158, 151, 157, 153)Week 12 to < Week 16 (n=156, 145, 153, 144)Week 16 to < Week 20 (n=150, 138, 149, 134)Week 20 to Week 26 (n=132, 133, 146, 130)Overall (n=160, 156, 161, 160)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg0.602.11.503.8
Alogliptin 25 mg01.32.67.30.811.3
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg001.301.42.5
Pioglitazone 30 mg003.42.21.56.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in VLDL Particles

"The change from Baseline in levels of medium VLDL particles and small VLDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline VLDL particles as a covariate." (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Medium Particles - Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Medium Particles - Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)Small Particles - Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Small Particles - Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-4.69-3.583.714.36
Alogliptin 25 mg-3.20-0.23-1.74-4.11
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-8.52-3.761.185.22
Pioglitazone 30 mg-2.30-0.394.777.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Particles

"The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium and small HDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline HDL particles as a covariate." (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionµmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Total Particles - Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Total Particles - Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)Large Particles - Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Large Particles - Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)Medium Particles - Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Medium Particles - Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)Small Particles - Week 12 (n=139, 132, 132, 141)Small Particles - Week 26 (n=147, 133, 141, 147)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg0.541.031.311.311.611.30-2.42-1.63
Alogliptin 25 mg0.180.810.07-0.06-0.26-0.260.501.24
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg0.111.010.981.241.601.19-2.65-1.58
Pioglitazone 30 mg0.921.670.991.140.720.95-0.68-0.28

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Change from Baseline in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline HDL cholesterol as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=146, 144, 142, 149)Week 8 (n=160, 151, 154, 158)Week 12 (n=160, 151, 155, 158)Week 16 (n=160, 151, 155, 158)Week 20 (n=160, 151, 155, 158)Week 26 (n=160, 151, 155, 158)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg3.04.86.55.95.66.2
Alogliptin 25 mg-0.20.50.90.90.50.8
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg3.85.06.46.05.66.2
Pioglitazone 30 mg3.04.76.05.24.75.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein

Change from Baseline in high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline hsCRP as a covariate. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

,,,
Interventionmg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=147, 134, 138, 146)Week 26 (n=153, 135, 144, 149)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-2.2771-1.9796
Alogliptin 25 mg-0.4497-0.1851
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-1.5346-1.9763
Pioglitazone 30 mg-1.7446-1.0391

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia

Marked Hyperglycemia is defined as fasting plasma glucose greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL. Study week windows are defined to place hyperglycemia into visit categories. (NCT00395512)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 1 to < Week 4 (n=162, 157, 162, 161)Week 4 to < Week 8 (n=153, 147, 148, 147)Week 8 to < Week 12 (n=151, 146, 152, 146)Week 12 to < Week 16 (n=153, 141, 148, 139)Week 16 to < Week 20 (n=142, 135, 144, 131)Week 20 to Week 26 (n=130, 132, 143, 128)Overall (n=162, 157, 162, 162)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg28.614.38.27.96.96.330.9
Alogliptin 25 mg31.519.015.216.316.217.744.4
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg18.510.87.28.12.810.525.3
Pioglitazone 30 mg31.815.011.69.214.811.438.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Hemoglobin A1C) at Week 24

HbA1c is measured as a percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. (NCT00397631)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg q.d. + Pioglitazone 30 mg q.d.-2.38
Pioglitazone 30 mg q.d.-1.49

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FPG (Fasting Plasma Glucose) at Week 24

Change from baseline at Week 24 is defined as Week 24 minus Week 0. (NCT00397631)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg q.d. + Pioglitazone 30 mg q.d.-63.0
Pioglitazone 30 mg q.d.-40.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2-hour PPG (Post-prandial Glucose) at Week 24

Change from baseline at Week 24 is defined as Week 24 minus Week 0. (NCT00397631)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg q.d. + Pioglitazone 30 mg q.d.-113.6
Pioglitazone 30 mg q.d.-68.9

[back to top]

Time to Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival, defined as the time from first administration of study drugs to the first PSA value of a PSA non-responder. Responders will be censored with date of PSA response for the analysis. The median time to PSA progression free survival was not achieved (NCT00427999)
Timeframe: every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
STI571+ Pioglitazone+ Etoricoxib + Dexamethasone + TreosulfaneNA

[back to top]

Time to PSA Response

Time to PSA response, defined as the time from first administration of study drugs to the first PSA value of a confirmed PSA response. Non-responders will be censored with date of final visit/premature discontinuation for the analysis. Median time to PSA response was not achieved (NCT00427999)
Timeframe: every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
STI571+ Pioglitazone+ Etoricoxib + Dexamethasone + TreosulfaneNA

[back to top]

PSA Response Rate

To investigate the effect of a treatment with Imatinib mesylate, Pioglitazone , Etoricoxib, and Dexamethasone in combination with metronomic chemotherapy (Treosulfane) on the PSA response rate in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer. A patient will be defined as a responder if a PSA decline of at least 50%, which must be confirmed by a second PSA value 4 weeks later, is observed. A patient will be defined as a non-responder if PSA has not decreased during treatment. Non-response is defined as a 25% increase over the baseline on-study which is confirmed (equal or more) by a second value 4 weeks apart. The absolute increase must account for > 5 ng/ml. (NCT00427999)
Timeframe: up to 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PSA responder - NoPSA responder - Yes
STI571+ Pioglitazone+ Etoricoxib + Dexamethasone + Treosulfane3823

[back to top]

Quality of Life Assessed With EORTC-30

Health-related quality of life was assessed with the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-30) questionnaire and was presented descriptively. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire including following sub-scales: global health status, functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social activity), symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain) and single items (dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea and financial difficulties). Scores are averaged for each scale and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score indicates better quality of life on global health status and functional scales and worse quality of life on symptom scales and financial difficulty scale. (NCT00427999)
Timeframe: baseline and Final Visit (week 24)

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline: financial difficulties (n=49)Baseline: appetite loss (n=50)Baseline: dyspnea (n=49)Baseline: constipation (n=50)Baseline: role functioning (n=50)Baseline: insomnia (n=49)Baseline: cognitive functioning (n=49)Baseline: diarrhea (n=50)Baseline: physical functioning (n=50)Baseline: pain (n=50)Baseline: emotional functioning (n=49)Baseline: social functioning (n=49)Baseline: fatigue (n=50)Baseline: global health status (n=49)Baseline: nausea & vomiting (n=50)Final Visit: financial difficulties (n=42)Final Visit: appetite loss (n=43)Final Visit: dyspnea (n=43)Final Visit: constipation (n=43)Final Visit: role functioning (n=43)Final Visit: insomnia (n=42)Final Visit: cognitive functioning (n=43)Final Visit: diarrhea (n=43)Final Visit: physical functioning (n=43)Final Visit: pain (n=43)Final Visit: emotional functioning (n=43)Final Visit: social functioning (n=43)Final Visit: fatigue (n=43)Final Visit: global health status (n=43)Final Visit: nausea & vomiting (n=43)
STI571+ Pioglitazone+ Etoricoxib + Dexamethasone + Treosulfane11.616.020.414.074.034.087.19.381.732.364.672.432.960.026.019.024.038.86.255.431.781.813.266.726.061.864.046.051.044.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rate

Overall survival (OS) is defined as time from randomization to death from any cause or last date known alive. The median time to overall survival rate was not achieved (NCT00427999)
Timeframe: every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
STI571+ Pioglitazone+ Etoricoxib + Dexamethasone + TreosulfaneNA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A2

Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein A2 was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein A2 as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=348, 355)Week 26 (n=359, 363)Week 42 (n=360, 363)Week 52 (n=360, 363)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-0.40.40.80.3
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin0.60.71.11.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1

Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein A1 as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=348, 355)Week 26 (n=359, 363)Week 42 (n=360, 363)Week 52 (n=360, 363)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin0.50.1-2.1-4.5
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin0.0-0.9-2.2-4.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Adiponectin

Change from Baseline in adiponectin was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline adiponectin as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionμg/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=355, 361)Week 26 (n=366, 371)Week 42 (n=367, 371)Week 52 (n=367, 371)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin1.151.17-0.41-0.70
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin2.974.193.042.21

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia

Marked Hyperglycemia is defined as fasting plasma glucose greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL (11.10 mmol/L). (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin27.3
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin36.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) / Chylomicron Particles

"The change from Baseline in levels of total VLDL/chylomicron particles and large VLDL/chylomicron particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline VLDL/chylomicron particles as covariates." (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Total Particles - Week 12 (n=357, 361)Total Particles - Week 26 (n=367, 368)Total Particles - Week 42 (n=367, 369)Total Particles - Week 52 (n=367, 369)Large Particles - Week 12 (n=357, 361)Large Particles - Week 26 (n=367, 368)Large Particles - Week 42 (n=367, 369)Large Particles - Week 52 (n=367, 369)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-0.591.27-1.35-1.20-0.83-0.39-0.72-0.66
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin2.393.091.643.03-0.27-0.32-0.38-0.46

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Meeting Hyperglycemic Rescue Criteria

"Rescue was defined as meeting 1 of the following criteria, confirmed by a 2nd sample drawn within 7 days after the first sample and analyzed by the central laboratory:~After more than 2 weeks of treatment but prior to the Week 4 Visit: A single fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥275 mg/dL;~From the Week 4 Visit but prior to the Week 8 Visit: A single FPG ≥250 mg/dL;~From the Week 8 Visit but prior to the Week 12 Visit: A single FPG ≥225 mg/dL;~From the Week 12 Visit through the End-of-Treatment Visit: HbA1c ≥8.5% AND ≤0.5% reduction in HbA1c as compared with the baseline HbA1c." (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin10.9
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin21.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose

The change from Baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was assessed at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline FPG as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 2 (n=360, 345)Week 4 (n=397, 394)Week 8 (n=399, 396)Week 12 (n=399, 396)Week 16 (n=399, 396)Week 20 (n=399, 396)Week 26 (n=399, 396)Week 34 (n=399, 396)Week 42 (n=399, 396)Week 52 (n=399, 396)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-15.5-17.7-19.1-19.6-18.0-16.4-17.1-13.6-15.9-14.6
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin-0.5-1.4-5.7-4.8-4.5-5.8-4.9-6.2-4.9-3.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin

The change from Baseline in fasting insulin was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting insulin as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

,
InterventionμIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=344, 328)Week 8 (n=382, 378)Week 12 (n=382, 378)Week 16 (n=383, 378)Week 20 (n=383, 378)Week 26 (n=383, 378)Week 34 (n=383, 378)Week 42 (n=383, 378)Week 52 (n=383, 378)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin0.530.721.211.191.601.941.411.791.91
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin-0.540.051.220.560.380.880.831.101.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Calculated HOMA Insulin Resistance

"The Homeostasis Model Assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA IR) measures insulin resistance based on fasting glucose and insulin measurements:~HOMA IR = fasting plasma insulin (µIU/mL) * fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) / 22.5~A higher number indicates a greater degree of insulin resistance. The change from Baseline in HOMA IR was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HOMA insulin resistance as covariates." (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventioninsulin resistance (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=380, 378)Week 26 (n=381, 378)Week 42 (n=381, 378)Week 52 (n=381, 378)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin0.0070.3360.2000.353
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin0.3500.3120.4310.541

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Calculated HOMA Beta-cell Function

"The Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) estimates steady state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population.~HOMA %B = 20 * insulin (µIU/mL) / fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) - 3.5~The change from Baseline in the homeostasis model assessment of beta cell function was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HOMA beta cell function as covariates." (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionpercentage beta cell function (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=380, 377)Week 26 (n=381, 377)Week 42 (n=381, 377)Week 52 (n=381, 377)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin14.77030.01215.39715.020
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin4.5803.2422.4002.057

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in VLDL / Chylomicron Triglycerides

"The change from Baseline in levels of VLDL/chylomicron triglycerides was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.~Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline VLDL/chylomicron triglycerides as covariates." (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=357, 361)Week 26 (n=367, 368)Week 42 (n=367, 369)Week 52 (n=367, 369)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-7.6-1.3-5.4-6.1
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin-0.20.20.2-1.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in VLDL Particles

The change from Baseline in levels of medium VLDL particles and small VLDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline VLDL particles as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Medium Particles - Week 12 (n=357, 361)Medium Particles - Week 26 (n=367, 368)Medium Particles - Week 42 (n=367, 369)Medium Particles - Week 52 (n=367, 369)Small Particles - Week 12 (n=357, 361)Small Particles - Week 26 (n=367, 368)Small Particles - Week 42 (n=367, 369)Small Particles - Week 52 (n=367, 369)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-0.091.301.030.26-0.040.07-1.86-1.02
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin1.742.232.432.121.301.47-0.211.58

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 0.5%

Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 0.5%. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Weeks 26 and 52.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 26Week 52
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin72.060.9
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin42.137.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 1.0%

Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 1.0%. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Weeks 26 and 52.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 26Week 52
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin42.335.6
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin20.317.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 1.5%

Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 1.5%. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Weeks 26 and 52.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 26Week 52
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin18.617.1
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin7.58.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 2.0%

Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 2.0%. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Weeks 26 and 52.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 26Week 52
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin8.27.9
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin3.03.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 6.5%

Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c less than or equal to 6.5%. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Weeks 26 and 52.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 26Week 52
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin13.98.7
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin7.84.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7.0%

Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c less than or equal to 7%. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Weeks 26 and 52.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 26Week 52
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin39.133.2
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin25.821.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7.5%

Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c less than or equal to 7.5%. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Weeks 26 and 52.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 26Week 52
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin64.959.9
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin47.144.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in C-peptide

C-peptide is a byproduct created when the hormone insulin is produced and is measured by a blood test. Change from Baseline was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting C-peptide as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=349, 333)Week 8 (n=393, 389)Week 12 (n=394, 390)Week 16 (n=395, 390)Week 20 (n=395, 390)Week 26 (n=395, 390)Week 34 (n=395, 390)Week 42 (n=395, 390)Week 52 (n=395, 390)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin0.1100.0740.0700.0640.1040.1020.1180.1400.182
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin-0.033-0.0380.0300.010-0.001-0.0130.0030.0370.108

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight

Change from Baseline in body weight was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline body weight as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=354, 344)Week 8 (n=394, 394Week 12 (n=395, 394)Week 26 (n=395, 394)Week 42 (n=395, 394)Week 52 (n=395, 394)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin0.180.310.350.731.091.10
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin0.320.510.640.971.521.60

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III

Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein C-III as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=352, 361)Week 26 (n=365, 369)Week 42 (n=366, 369)Week 52 (n=366, 369)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-0.6-0.1-0.3-0.5
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin0.10.20.20.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B

Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein B was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein B as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 [N=348, 355]Week 26 [N=359, 363]Week 42 [N=360, 363]Week 52 [N=360, 363]
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-3.1-0.6-0.4-1.2
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin0.11.11.81.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Triglycerides

Change from Baseline in triglycerides was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline triglycerides as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=397, 393)Week 8 (n=399, 395)Week 12 (n=399, 395)Week 16 (n=399, 395)Week 20 (n=399, 395)Week 26 (n=399, 395)Week 34 (n=399, 395)Week 42 (n=399, 395)Week 52 (n=399, 395)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-16.4-17.9-16.1-16.3-12.7-11.9-7.4-14.6-16.4
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin-12.2-12.3-4.5-9.4-8.5-6.3-8.1-7.0-7.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol

Change from Baseline in total cholesterol was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline total cholesterol as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=397, 393)Week 8 (n=399, 395)Week 12 (n=399, 395)Week 16 (n=399, 395)Week 20 (n=399, 395)Week 26 (n=399, 395)Week 34 (n=399, 395)Week 42 (n=399, 395)Week 52 (n=399, 395)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-5.2-4.0-3.6-4.3-3.9-2.1-3.5-3.8-4.4
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin-1.90.31.1-0.4-0.51.0-0.70.0-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio

The ratio of proinsulin to insulin was calculated as proinsulin (pmol/L) / insulin (μIU/mL) at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52 relative to the Baseline value. Least squares means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting proinsulin/insulin ratio as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=341, 325)Week 8 (n=380, 375)Week 12 (n=380, 375)Week 16 (n=381, 375)Week 20 (n=381, 375)Week 26 (n=381, 375)Week 34 (n=381, 375)Week 42 (n=381, 375)Week 52 (n=381, 375)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-0.046-0.049-0.053-0.044-0.037-0.036-0.038-0.047-0.048
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin-0.005-0.0010.0040.002-0.004-0.015-0.004-0.010-0.007

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1

Change from Baseline in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline PAI-1 as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionng/ml (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=322, 330)Week 26 (n=342, 343)Week 42 (n=346, 344)Week 52 (n=346, 344)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-3.23-2.83-2.08-2.92
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin-3.59-3.63-4.89-4.70

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Lipid Fractionation Total Triglycerides

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) lipid fractionation was used to assess the change from Baseline in total triglyceride levels at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR triglycerides as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=357, 361)Week 26 (n=367, 368)Week 42 (n=367, 369)Week 52 (n=367, 369)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-8.7-1.7-6.4-6.9
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin0.20.80.7-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean VLDL Particle Size

Change from Baseline in mean VLDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean VLDL particle size as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=355, 361)Week 26 (n=365, 368)Week 42 (n=365, 369)Week 52 (n=365, 369)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-0.670.110.44-0.12
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin-0.79-0.87-0.79-1.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean LDL Particle Size

Change from Baseline in mean LDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean LDL particle size as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=357, 361)Week 26 (n=367, 368)Week 42 (n=367, 369)Week 52 (n=367, 369)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin0.050.03-0.02-0.04
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin0.060.070.050.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean HDL Particle Size

Change from Baseline in mean HDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean HDL particle size as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=357, 361)Week 26 (n=367, 368)Week 42 (n=367, 369)Week 52 (n=367, 369)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin0.040.040.020.03
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin0.050.070.070.08

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Change from Baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline LDL cholesterol as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=388, 383)Week 8 (n=390, 386)Week 12 (n=390, 386)Week 16 (n=390, 386)Week 20 (n=390, 386)Week 26 (n=390, 386)Week 34 (n=390, 386)Week 42 (n=390, 386)Week 52 (n=390, 386)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-2.4-0.6-1.2-1.7-2.0-0.6-1.9-1.6-1.9
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin0.02.11.4-0.10.11.61.20.71.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Particles

The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium-small, total small and very small LDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline LDL particles as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Total Particles - Week 12 (n=357, 361)Total Particles - Week 26 (n=367, 368)Total Particles - Week 42 (n=367, 369)Total Particles - Week 52 (n=367, 369)Large Particles - Week 12 (n=357, 361)Large Particles - Week 26 (n=367, 368)Large Particles - Week 42 (n=367, 369)Large Particles - Week 52 (n=367, 369)Medium-small Particles - Week 12 (n=357, 361)Medium-small Particles - Week 26 (n=367, 368)Medium-small Particles - Week 42 (n=367, 369)Medium-small Particles - Week 52 (n=367, 369)Total Small Particles - Week 12 (n=357, 361)Total Small Particles - Week 26 (n=367, 368)Total Small Particles - Week 42 (n=367, 369)Total Small Particles - Week 52 (n=367, 369)Very Small Particles - Week 12 (n=357, 361)Very Small Particles - Week 26 (n=367, 368)Very Small Particles - Week 42 (n=367, 369)Very Small Particles - Week 52 (n=367, 369)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-46.9-14.0-11.7-13.0-4.41.1-20.8-19.2-7.0-0.74.12.4-37.6-10.915.010.9-30.6-10.111.08.6
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin-22.3-8.2-10.7-2.7-5.08.80.0-2.4-0.3-0.71.81.2-20.8-18.2-13.0-3.5-20.6-17.5-14.9-4.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Intermediate Density Lipoprotein (IDL) Particles

The change from Baseline in levels of IDL particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline IDL particles as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=357, 361)Week 26 (n=367, 368)Week 42 (n=367, 369)Week 52 (n=367, 369)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-4.9-4.1-5.6-4.5
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin3.21.02.03.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein

Change from Baseline in high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline hsCRP as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionmg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=357, 366)Week 26 (n=366, 373)Week 42 (n=367, 373)Week 52 (n=367, 373)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin0.2989-0.06320.72510.5875
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin0.70490.97060.64431.4085

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Change from Baseline in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HDL cholesterol as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=397, 392)Week 8 (n=399, 395)Week 12 (n=399, 395)Week 16 (n=399, 395)Week 20 (n=399, 395)Week 26 (n=399, 395)Week 34 (n=399, 395)Week 42 (n=399, 395)Week 52 (n=395, 395)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-0.7-0.8-0.2-0.5-0.20.0-0.6-0.3-0.3
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin0.40.61.10.90.70.60.30.60.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Particles

The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium and small HDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HDL particles as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionμmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Total Particles - Week 12 (n=357, 361)Total Particles - Week 26 (n=367, 368)Total Particles - Week 42 (n=367, 369)Total Particles - Week 52 (n=367, 369)Large Particles - Week 12 (n=357, 361)Large Particles - Week 26 (n=367, 368)Large Particles - Week 42 (n=367, 369)Large Particles - Week 52 (n=367, 369)Medium Particles - Week 12 (n=357, 361)Medium Particles - Week 26 (n=367, 368)Medium Particles - Week 42 (n=367, 369)Medium Particles - Week 52 (n=367, 369)Small Particles - Week 12 (n=357, 361)Small Particles - Week 26 (n=367, 368)Small Particles - Week 42 (n=367, 369)Small Particles - Week 52 (n=367, 369)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-0.180.370.090.380.080.190.060.190.100.710.570.66-0.38-0.53-0.54-0.47
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin-0.140.03-0.110.020.350.530.510.570.430.900.700.96-0.92-1.39-1.31-1.49

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c Over Time

The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) during the study. Least Squares Means were from an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, study schedule, and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HbA1c as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 34 and 42.

,
Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline at Week 4 (n=276, 277)Change from Baseline at Week 8 (n=303, 306)Change from Baseline at Week 12 (n=303, 306)Change from Baseline at Week 16 (n=303, 306)Change from Baseline at Week 20 (n=303, 306)Change from Baseline at Week 34 (n=303, 306)Change from Baseline at Week 42 (n=303, 306)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-0.42-0.71-0.85-0.91-0.91-0.82-0.80
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin-0.15-0.27-0.35-0.43-0.45-0.37-0.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

The change from Baseline to Week 26 and Week 52 in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound). (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 26 and 52.

,
Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline at Week 26Change from Baseline at Week 52
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-0.89-0.70
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin-0.42-0.29

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Free Fatty Acids

Change from Baseline in free fatty acids was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline free fatty acids as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42, and 52.

,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12 (n=355, 360)Week 26 (n=366, 368)Week 42 (n=367, 368)Week 52 (n=367, 368)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-0.0526-0.0364-0.0243-0.0294
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin-0.0332-0.0162-0.02220.0019

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin

Proinsulin is a precursor to insulin, and was measured as an indicator of pancreatic function. The change from Baseline in fasting proinsulin was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting proinsulin as covariates. (NCT00432276)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

,
Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=342, 325)Week 8 (n=380, 376)Week 12 (n=380, 376)Week 16 (n=381, 376)Week 20 (n=381, 376)Week 26 (n=381, 376)Week 34 (n=381, 376)Week 42 (n=381, 376)Week 52 (n=381, 376)
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg + Metformin-2.0-2.3-1.3-0.2-0.50.60.9-0.1-0.5
Pioglitazone 45 mg + Metformin-0.8-0.51.60.60.30.70.31.11.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

HbA1c is a measure of average blood sugar levels over the preceding 3 month period. HbA1c was measured by ion-exchange chromatography and reported as a percentage. (NCT00443755)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Insulin Sensitizer Therapy-0.35
Placebo0.19

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Biomarker Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α)

TNF-α is an inflammatory cytokine and is reported in picograms/milliliter (pg/mL). (NCT00443755)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 month

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Insulin Sensitizer Therapy-0.13
Placebo0.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Insulin Levels

Insulin levels in the blood were measured by immunoenzymatic assay and reported in micro International Units per milliliter (mcIU/mL). (NCT00443755)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

InterventionmicroIU/mL (Mean)
Insulin Sensitizer Therapy-8.13
Placebo1.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity as Measured by Glucose Infusion Rate (GIR)

Insulin sensitivity was measured the morning after an overnight fast during an in-patient stay in the Clinical Research Unit & was determined by the mean GIR necessary to maintain euglycemia during a hyperinsulinemic (1.5 mcIU/kg of FFM per minute)-euglycemic (85-95 mg/dL) clamp. The clamp is an 8 hour process where a hand vein is catheterized to collect blood samples and intravenous lines are used to infuse glucose, saline, insulin, phenylalanine and amino acid solutions at at pre-specified times/rates. The mean GIR was calculated as the rate per kilograms of fat-free mass (FFM) during 4 hours of steady-state (hours 4-8 of the 8 hour clamp) reported as micromols/kilogram of FFM per minute. The FFM was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. Insulin was infused with 5% essential amino acid solution (3mL/kg of FFM/hour) to prevent the insulin-dependent decrease of amino acids during insulin infusion. (NCT00443755)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

Interventionmicromols/kg of FFM/minute (Mean)
Insulin Sensitizer Therapy17.95
Placebo1.68

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Biomarker Adiponectin

Adiponectin is an anti-inflammatory cytokine and is reported in milligrams per milliliter (mg/mL). (NCT00443755)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

Interventionmg/mL (Mean)
Insulin Sensitizer Therapy9.10
Placebo0.46

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Biomarker C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

CRP is an inflammatory cytokine and is reported in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). (NCT00443755)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Insulin Sensitizer Therapy-0.19
Placebo-0.15

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Biomarker Interleukin 6 (IL-6)

IL-6 is an inflammatory cytokine and reported in picograms per deciliter (pg/dL). (NCT00443755)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Insulin Sensitizer Therapy-0.99
Placebo-1.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Thrombotic Biomarker Fibrinogen

Fibrinogen was measured by thrombin clotting rate assay (Beckman Coulter, Inc. Brea, California) and reported in milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL). (NCT00443755)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Insulin Sensitizer Therapy14.00
Placebo-18.62

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Thrombotic Biomarker Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1)

PAI-1 was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Diagnostica Stago Inc., Parsippany, New Jersey) and reported in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL). (NCT00443755)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Insulin Sensitizer Therapy-34.17
Placebo8.15

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile

Change in lipids were measured by the change from baseline to 3 months of triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C). All were reported in milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL). (NCT00443755)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
TriglyceridesHDL-C-CholesterolNon-HDL-Cholesterol
Insulin Sensitizer Therapy-15.584.33-7.50
Placebo17.77-0.314.62

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Fat

Body fat is reported as a percentage of body weight. (NCT00443755)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

Interventionpercentage of body weight (Mean)
Insulin Sensitizer Therapy1.73
Placebo-0.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index

Body Mass Index (BMI) is a health index for comparing weight to height. BMI is a person's weight in kilograms (kg) divided by his or her height in meters squared. The body mass index is an indication if a person is at a suitable weight for his height on an approximation of body fat. (NCT00443755)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
Insulin Sensitizer Therapy0.37
Placebo-0.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose Level

Glucose (sugar) was measured in the blood and reported in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). (NCT00443755)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Insulin Sensitizer Therapy-19.96
Placebo8.39

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fat-Free Mass (FFM)

FFM was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans and is reported in kilograms (kg). (NCT00443755)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

Interventionkilograms (Mean)
Insulin Sensitizer Therapy-1.13
Placebo-0.34

[back to top]

IMCL

Intramyocellular lipid was measured using immunohistochemistry (using oil Red O staining) in muscle biopsy specimens. Oil red O-stained muscle sections were magnified with an Olympus Provis (Tokyo, Japan) light microscope, and images were digitally captured by using a connected charge-coupled device camera (Sony, Tokyo, Japan). Fiber-typed and oil red O-stained fibers were matched. The oil red O staining intensity of either type 1 or 2 muscle fibers was quantified using National Institutes of Health Image program (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/). By adjusting a density threshold, the software was set to recognize the presence of one fat droplet only if its highlighted surface was exceeding 0.40 μm2 or larger. Muscle lipid content was calculated by total area of lipid droplets in a given muscle fiber divided by the total area of the same fiber. The mean number of fibers analyzed per sample was 40 for type 1 and 2 muscle fibers (NCT00470262)
Timeframe: 3 months

,
Intervention% of lipid area stained (Mean)
prepost
Fenofibrate 145mg PO QD3.673.46
Fenofibrate 145mg PO QD + Pioglitazone 45mg PO BID5.322.82

[back to top]

Insulin Sensitivity

Insulin sensitivity was measure through frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Subjects presented to research center fasting. Blood samples were collected at -21, -11, and -1 minutes. At time t=0 initiates the start of the IVGTT and the injection of glucose into the non-sampling arm. The glucose dose was calculated as 11.4g/m2 of body surface area, given as a 50% dextrose solution. This glucose injection was administered over 60 seconds or less. At time t=20 minutes, an insulin dose of 0.04u/kg was administered over 30 seconds. Blood samples were collected at times t=2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 30, 40, 50, 70, 90, 100, 120, 140, 160, and 180. If blood sugar did not return to a steady state the test was continued to t= 210 or t= 240. (NCT00470262)
Timeframe: 3 months

,
Interventionmg*kg^-1*min^-1 (Mean)
prepost
Fenofibrate 145 mg PO QD + Pioglitazone1.732.93
Fenofibrate 145mg PO QD1.481.89

[back to top]

Apolipoprotein B At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Apolipoprotein (Apo) B, a measure of the total amount of Apo B in the blood, is being reported. Normal Apo B levels are <100 mg/dL. (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26 post-dose

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 26
Pioglitazone 45 mg114.3110.3
Placebo112.8115.3
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg116.1113.6
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg114.6111.5

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 52 Extension Period Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

The change in normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels are being reported. A greater (negative) change from baseline indicates an improvement in FPG. (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 52 weeks post-dose

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg-33.8
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg-34.2
Pioglitazone 45 mg-29.5
Placebo/ Pioglitazone 45 mg-35.9

[back to top]

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I is a measure of the total amount of Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I in the blood. Decreased ApoA-1 levels are associated with poor clinical outcome. A lower percent change in ApoA-1 levels indicates an improvement in clinical outcome. (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Placebo2.0
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg1.0
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg0.9
Pioglitazone 45 mg0.8

[back to top]

Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

"Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), bad cholesterol, is a measure of the total amount of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. A higher percent change indicates improvement." (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose

Interventionpercent change in LDL (Mean)
Placebo3.4
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg9.3
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg9.6
Pioglitazone 45 mg7.3

[back to top]

Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

"Total cholesterol is a measure of the total amount of cholesterol in the blood, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) - the bad cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) - the good cholesterol, and triglycerides. The equation to calculate total cholesterol is: LDL + HDL + (triglycerides/5) = total cholesterol. Higher percent change in total cholesterol indicates better outcome, ie. improvement." (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose

Interventionpercent change in total cholesterol (Mean)
Placebo1.9
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg4.0
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg5.3
Pioglitazone 45 mg3.6

[back to top]

Percent Change in Total Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Total Triglycerides (TG) is a measure of the total amount of triglycerides in the blood. The equation to calculate total triglycerides is: (total cholesterol-Low-density Lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL- C) - High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL- C)) x 5 = Total Triglycerides. A negative change means better outcome, ie. improvement. (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose

Interventionpercent change in total triglycerides (Mean)
Placebo-1.8
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg-10.3
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg-11.7
Pioglitazone 45 mg-9.6

[back to top]

Apolipoprotein A-I At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I levels, a measure of the total amount of Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I in the blood, are being reported. Normal Apo A-1 levels range from 120-140 mg/dL. (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26 post-dose

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 26
Pioglitazone 45 mg143.6143.9
Placebo145.3146.2
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg145.7146.4
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg145.2145.9

[back to top]

Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline Through Week 52 Extension Period Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Change in hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels are reported. Greater (negative) percent change indicates improvement. (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 52 weeks post-dose

Interventionpercent change in HbA1c (Mean)
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg-0.5
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg-0.7
Pioglitazone 45 mg-0.7
Placebo/ Pioglitazone 45 mg-0.4

[back to top] [back to top]

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Apolipoprotein (Apo) B, a measure of the total amount of Apo B in the blood, is being reported. A greater (negative) percent change in ApoB levels indicated an improvement in clinical outcome. (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Placebo3.0
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg-0.4
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg-1.1
Pioglitazone 45 mg-2.5

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

The change in normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels are being reported. A greater (negative) change from baseline indicates an improvement in FPG. (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Placebo6.1
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg-22.1
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg-32.4
Pioglitazone 45 mg-29.5

[back to top]

Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline Through Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Percent change in hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels are reported. Greater (negative) percent change indicates improvement. (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose

Interventionpercent change in HbA1c (Mean)
Placebo0.3
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg-0.3
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg-0.6
Pioglitazone 45 mg-0.5

[back to top]

Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

"High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), good cholesterol, is a measure of the total amount of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. A higher percent change indicates improvement." (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline to 26 weeks post-dose

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Placebo2.7
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg10.3
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg14.8
Pioglitazone 45 mg12.3

[back to top]

Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment Index for Insulin Resistance At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

"The change in the Homeostasis Model Assessment index for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated as:~(fasting insulin concentration [μU/mL] x fasting glucose concentration [mmol/L])/22.5 Low HOMA-IR scores indicate high insulin sensitivity, whereas high HOMA-IR scores indicate low insulin sensitivity (insulin resistance). A normal HOMA-IR score is <2.60, HOMA-IR scores 2.60-3.80 are considered borderline high, and HOMA-IR scores >3.80 are considered high and have correlations of insulin resistance. A negative HOMA-IR score indicates an improvement in insulin sensitivity." (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.4
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg-1.5
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg-2.3
Pioglitazone 45 mg-2.2

[back to top]

Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels are being reported. Normal FPG levels range from 70-110 mg/dL. Lower FPG values indicates better clinical outcome, ie. improvement in FPG. (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 26 post-dose

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 26
Pioglitazone 45 mg161.9132.3
Placebo161.1167.5
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg159.2136.5
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg160.9128.6

[back to top]

Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 52 Extension Period Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels are being reported. Normal FPG levels range from 70-110 mg/dL. Lower FPG values indicates better clinical outcome, ie. improvement in FPG. (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52 post-dose

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 52
Pioglitazone 45 mg149.0115.6
Placebo/ Pioglitazone 45 mg142.5124.9
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg147.4117.8
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg152.8116.6

[back to top]

Hemoglobin A1c at Baseline and Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Percentage of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels are reported. (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 26 post-dose

,,,
Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Mean)
BaselineWeek 26
Pioglitazone 45 mg7.77.2
Placebo7.78.0
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg7.77.3
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg7.77.1

[back to top]

Hemoglobin A1c at Baseline and Week 52 Extension Period Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Percentage of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels are reported. (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52 post-dose

,,,
Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Mean)
BaselineWeek 52
Pioglitazone 45 mg7.66.9
Placebo/Pioglitazone 45 mg7.47.0
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg7.57.0
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg7.66.9

[back to top]

High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

"High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), good cholesterol, is a measure of the total amount of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. Normal HDL levels are >40 mg/dL." (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26 post-dose

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 26
Pioglitazone 45 mg44.749.7
Placebo45.345.6
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg46.050.4
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg45.852.0

[back to top]

Homeostasis Model Assessment Index for Insulin Resistance At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

"Homeostasis Model Assessment index for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated as:~(fasting insulin concentration [μU/mL] x fasting glucose concentration [mmol/L])/22.5 Low HOMA-IR scores indicate high insulin sensitivity, whereas high HOMA-IR scores indicate low insulin sensitivity (insulin resistance). A normal HOMA-IR score is <2.60, HOMA-IR scores 2.60-3.80 are considered borderline high, and HOMA-IR scores >3.80 are considered high and have correlations of insulin resistance. High HOMA-IR scores indicate worse outcome." (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 26 post-dose

,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 26
Pioglitazone 45 mg6.24.1
Placebo6.26.8
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg5.64.0
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg6.03.7

[back to top]

Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

"Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), bad cholesterol, is a measure of the total amount of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. Normal LDL levels are <100 mg/dL." (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 26 post-dose

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 26
Pioglitazone 45 mg110.5115.0
Placebo108.5111.8
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg112.8118.0
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg112.1118.7

[back to top]

Total Cholesterol At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

"Total cholesterol is a measure of the total amount of cholesterol in the blood, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) - the bad cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) - the good cholesterol, and triglycerides. The equation to calculate total cholesterol is: LDL + HDL + (triglycerides/5) = total cholesterol." (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 26 post-dose

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 26
Pioglitazone 45 mg189.8194.6
Placebo190.1191.9
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg193.4198.0
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg191.6199.1

[back to top]

Total Triglycerides At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Total Triglycerides (TG) is a measure of the total amount of triglycerides in the blood. The equation to calculate total triglycerides is: (total cholesterol-Low-density Lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL- C) - High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL- C)) x 5 = Total Triglycerides. Normal triglyceride levels are below 150 mg/dL. (NCT00484198)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 26 post-dose

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 26
Pioglitazone 45 mg175.0152.1
Placebo185.6170.5
Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg173.3148.0
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg169.5141.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fructosamine

Fasted blood samples for fructosamine were collected up to Week 12. Participants were required to fast for at least 8 hours prior to laboratory samples and were told not to take the morning dose of study medication on these visit days and to refrain from eating until instructed to do so by study personnel in the clinic. When the participant had not fasted, the participant was rescheduled to return to the clinic to have a fasted sample taken. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 12

InterventionMicromol per Liter (mcmol/L) (Mean)
Placebo5.7
GSK189075 50 mg-33.8
GSK189075 100 mg-35.7
GSK189075 250 mg-38.9
GSK189075 500 mg-41.9
GSK189075 1000 mg-55.2
Pioglitazone 30 mg-34.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Insulin

Fasted blood samples for insulin were collected up to Week 12. Participants were required to fast for at least 8 hours prior to laboratory samples and were told not to take the morning dose of study medication on these visit days and to refrain from eating until instructed to do so by study personnel in the clinic. When the participant had not fasted, the participant was rescheduled to return to the clinic to have a fasted sample taken. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 12

InterventionPicomol per Liter (pmol/L) (Mean)
Placebo-30.6
GSK189075 50 mg0.3
GSK189075 100 mg-20.7
GSK189075 250 mg-9.7
GSK189075 500 mg-25.8
GSK189075 1000 mg-15.1
Pioglitazone 30 mg-2.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Body Weight

Weight of participants was measured from Baseline (Week 0) to Week 12 and recorded in the case report form (CRF). Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 12

InterventionKilograms (Mean)
Placebo-0.49
GSK189075 50 mg-1.78
GSK189075 100 mg-2.41
GSK189075 250 mg-2.38
GSK189075 500 mg-3.52
GSK189075 1000 mg-4.00
Pioglitazone 30 mg0.96

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Plasma Glucose Area Under the Curve (AUC) During a 2-hour Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)

"Post-prandial assessments of glucose were performed at Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 12 using a 2-hour OGTT in a subgroup of participants at selected sites who agreed to participate. Participants were required to fast for at least 8 hours prior to the test. Seventy-five (75) g of standard oral glucose solution was administered 15 minutes after the morning administration of study medication (Week 12) and in the place of breakfast at Week 0 (i.e., at Week 0 the OGTT was completed prior to administration of study medication). Time 0 started when the participants drank the glucose solution. Blood samples were collected at the following times relative to the administration of oral glucose: -30 min (pre-glucose), -20 min (pre-glucose), 20 min, 30 min, 1 hour, 1.5 hour and 2 hour post glucose administration. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values." (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 (0 to 2 hour OGTT)

InterventionMillimol*hour per Liter (mmol*hr/L) (Mean)
Placebo-0.90
GSK189075 50 mg-6.31
GSK189075 100 mg-6.71
GSK189075 250 mg-7.69
GSK189075 500 mg-6.06
GSK189075 1000 mg-7.59
Pioglitazone 30 mg-6.55

[back to top]

Number of Participants With On-therapy Hypoglycemia

Hypoglycemia is low blood glucose or low blood sugar. Hypoglycemic events were collected separately and reported separately from AE, including supplemental data which were not collected for AE. However, any hypoglycemic event which met the criteria for a SAE was included in the SAE summaries. The number of participants in each group that experienced a hypoglycemic event was summarized by frequency of the events. (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Up to 14 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo1
GSK189075 50 mg1
GSK189075 100 mg0
GSK189075 250 mg0
GSK189075 500 mg1
GSK189075 1000 mg0
Pioglitazone 30 mg0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Insulin AUC During a 2-hour OGTT

"Post-prandial assessments of insulin were performed at Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 12 using a 2-hour OGTT in a subgroup of participants at selected sites who agreed to participate. Participants were required to fast for at least 8 hours prior to the test. Seventy-five (75) g of standard oral glucose solution was administered 15 minutes after the morning administration of study medication (Week 12) and in the place of breakfast at Week 0 (i.e., at Week 0 the OGTT was completed prior to administration of study medication). Time 0 started when the participants drank the glucose solution. Blood samples were collected at the following times relative to the administration of oral glucose: -30 min (pre-glucose), -20 min (pre-glucose), 20 min, 30 min, 1 hour, 1.5 hour and 2 hour post glucose administration. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values." (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 (0 to 2-hour OGTT)

InterventionPicomol*hour per Liter (pmol*hr/L) (Mean)
Placebo-5.3
GSK189075 50 mg162.4
GSK189075 100 mg-70.9
GSK189075 250 mg66.6
GSK189075 500 mg-173.9
GSK189075 1000 mg-97.8
Pioglitazone 30 mg10.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in C-peptide AUC During a 2-hr OGTT

"Post-prandial assessments of C-peptide were performed at Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 12 using a 2-hour OGTT in a subgroup of participants at selected sites who agreed to participate. Participants were required to fast for at least 8 hours prior to the test. Seventy-five (75) g of standard oral glucose solution was administered 15 minutes after the morning administration of study medication (Week 12) and in the place of breakfast at Week 0 (i.e., at Week 0 the OGTT was completed prior to administration of study medication). Time 0 started when the participants drank the glucose solution. Blood samples were collected at the following times relative to the administration of oral glucose: -30 min (pre-glucose), -20 min (pre-glucose), 20 min, 30 min, 1 hour, 1.5 hour and 2 hour post glucose administration. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values." (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 (0 to 2 hour OGTT)

InterventionNanomol*hour per Liter (nmol*hr/L) (Mean)
Placebo-0.140
GSK189075 50 mg0.654
GSK189075 100 mg-0.156
GSK189075 250 mg-0.026
GSK189075 500 mg-0.476
GSK189075 1000 mg-0.175
Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.239

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 24-hour Percent of Filtered Glucose Excreted in Urine

A 24-hour urine collection was obtained from all participants at Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 to measure glucose. Participants were provided with urine collection bottles and cooler prior to these visits and instructed that the urine collections must be kept cold and dropped off at the clinic prior to or at the scheduled visits. Site staff queried participants to determine whether the sample represented a full 24-hour collection. The total volume and the sample date and time were recorded. The entire 24-hour urine collection was well mixed in one container and a urine aliquot obtained. Samples were assayed for glucose. The 24-hour collections were used to derive 24-hour urine glucose excretion corrected for filtered load. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 (24-hour urine collection)

InterventionPercentage of filtered glucose molecules (Mean)
Placebo-1.09
GSK189075 50 mg27.96
GSK189075 100 mg40.43
GSK189075 250 mg38.98
GSK189075 500 mg42.41
GSK189075 1000 mg52.39
Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.99

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Week 0) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%) at Week 12

Fasted blood samples for HbA1c were collected at Baseline and Week 12. Participants were required to fast for at least 8 hours prior to laboratory samples and were told not to take the morning dose of study medication on these visit days and to refrain from eating until instructed to do so by study personnel in the clinic. When the participant had not fasted, the participant was rescheduled to return to the clinic to have a fasted sample taken. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. Only those participants with a value at Baseline and at Week 12 (after Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF]) were used for this analysis. Adjusted mean is presented as least square mean. (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12

InterventionPercentage of hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.31
GSK189075 50 mg-1.04
GSK189075 100 mg-0.96
GSK189075 250 mg-1.05
GSK189075 500 mg-1.21
GSK189075 1000 mg-1.38
Pioglitazone 30 mg-1.07

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 8 and 12(Triglycerides [TG], Total Cholesterol [TC], Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [LDL-C] and High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [HDL-C])

Fasted samples for TC, LDL-C, HDL-C and TG were collected at Week 12. When the participant had not fasted, the participant was rescheduled to return to the clinic to have a fasted sample taken. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. Percent Change based on log-transformed data: 100*(exponentiated(mean change on log scale)-1) (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12

,,,,,,
InterventionPercent change (Median)
TG: Week 4TG: Week 8TG: Week 12TC: Week 4TC: Week 8TC: Week 12LDL-C: Week 4LDL-C: Week 8LDL-C: Week 12HDL-C: Week 4HDL-C: Week 8HDL-C: Week 12
GSK189075 100 mg6.320.5910.921.623.645.450.373.623.573.695.004.96
GSK189075 1000 mg-4.62-7.30-9.972.390.002.777.024.4414.890.000.004.27
GSK189075 250 mg-13.42-10.01-4.714.134.493.976.918.963.935.133.096.70
GSK189075 50 mg-3.45-9.09-10.911.853.493.390.838.676.695.436.205.56
GSK189075 500 mg-13.04-13.35-15.284.435.319.8210.037.5711.435.697.1411.93
Pioglitazone 30mg-7.22-0.79-7.192.291.06-2.050.00-2.241.189.188.2010.00
Placebo-8.35-1.663.320.470.824.750.823.173.17-1.970.000.00

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Standard Laboratory Parameters of Potential Clinical Concern

Participants were instructed to fast for at least 8 hours prior to all study visits for the collection of laboratory samples. An additional fasting blood sample (serum and plasma) was drawn at Week 0, Week 4, Week 6 and Week 12 or at early withdrawal (up to 14 weeks) and kept in long-term storage for future testing of biomarkers for diabetes and complications of the disease. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Up to 14 weeks

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Low HemoglobinLow Hematocrit
GSK189075 100 mg00
GSK189075 1000 mg00
GSK189075 250 mg00
GSK189075 50 mg00
GSK189075 500 mg00
Pioglitazone 30 mg00
Placebo11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With On-therapy Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. For marketed medicinal products, this also includes failure to produce expected benefits (i.e., lack of efficacy), abuse or misuse. SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AESAE
GSK189075 100 mg170
GSK189075 1000 mg220
GSK189075 250 mg190
GSK189075 50 mg180
GSK189075 500 mg180
Pioglitazone 30 mg220
Placebo180

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values of Potential Clinical Concern

Full 12-lead ECGs were recorded at screening, Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, Week 12 or early withdrawal, and Week 14 (Follow-up) using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured the PR, QRS, QT and corrected QT (QTc) intervals. All 12-lead ECGs were read locally by the Investigator or his/her designate and were forwarded electronically to the central reader for interpretation. If the QTc was >500 milliseconds (msec) on the locally read ECG recording, an additional 2 ECG recordings at 10 minute intervals were made at that visit. If the average QTc for the 3 recordings was >500 msec, the participant was withdrawn from the study. (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Up to Early withdrawal (Between Week 12 and Week 14)

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PR interval > 300 msecQRS Duration > 200 msecQTc(Bazett) > 500 msecQTc(Fridericia) > 500 msec
GSK189075 100 mg0000
GSK189075 1000 mg0000
GSK189075 250 mg0000
GSK189075 50 mg0000
GSK189075 500 mg0000
Pioglitazone 30 mg0000
Placebo0000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern

Vital signs included heart rate and blood pressure. Heart rate and blood pressure were taken before blood draws were performed. Participants were asked to refrain from smoking for at least 30 minutes prior to vital sign measurements. Heart rate and blood pressure was measured pre-dose in duplicate at the specified visits, after the participant had been lying quietly for 5 minutes, and then in duplicate 3 minutes after standing up. Heart rate was measured at the same time as blood pressure using the standardized blood pressure equipment that was provided. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Up to 14 weeks

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
High SBPLow SBPHigh DBPLow DBPHigh heart rateLow heart rate
GSK189075 100 mg210200
GSK189075 1000 mg122101
GSK189075 250 mg020000
GSK189075 50 mg000110
GSK189075 500 mg020001
Pioglitazone 30 mg000300
Placebo301000

[back to top]

Number of Participants at Week 12 With: HbA1c <= 6.5%, HbA1c <7.0%; FPG <7 Mmo/L, FPG <7.8 mmol/L; FPG <5.5 mmol/L; a Decrease From Baseline of HbA1c >= 0.7%; a Decrease From Baseline of FPG ≥1.7 mmol/L

Fasted blood samples for HbA1c were collected at Week 12. Participants were required to fast for at least 8 hours prior to laboratory samples and were told not to take the morning dose of study medication on these visit days and to refrain from eating until instructed to do so by study personnel in the clinic. When the participant had not fasted, the participant was rescheduled to return to the clinic to have a fasted sample taken. Number of participants at Week 12 with: HbA1c <= 6.5%, HbA1c <7.0%; FPG <7 mmo/L (126 milligram/deciliter [mg/dL]), FPG <7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL); FPG <5.5 mmol/L (100 mg/dL); a decrease from Baseline of HbA1c >= 0.7%; a decrease from Baseline of FPG ≥1.7 mmol/L (30 mg/dL) are presented. (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Week 12

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HbA1c <= 6.5%HbA1c <7.0%FPG <7 mmo/LFPG <7.8 mmol/LFPG <5.5 mmol/LDecrease from Baseline of HbA1c >= 0.7%Decrease from Baseline of FPG ≥1.7 mmol/L
GSK189075 100 mg818202622719
GSK189075 1000 mg1729223433930
GSK189075 250 mg1122182753321
GSK189075 50 mg1020162443315
GSK189075 500 mg1728223343624
Pioglitazone 30 mg821213122823
Placebo394130168

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Fasted blood samples for FPG were collected up to Week 12. Participants were required to fast for at least 8 hours prior to laboratory samples and were told not to take the morning dose of study medication on these visit days and to refrain from eating until instructed to do so by study personnel in the clinic. When the participant had not fasted, the participant was rescheduled to return to the clinic to have a fasted sample taken. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12

,,,,,,
InterventionMillimoles per Liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
GSK189075 100 mg-1.43-1.30-1.63
GSK189075 1000 mg-2.48-2.78-2.76
GSK189075 250 mg-1.49-1.76-1.80
GSK189075 50 mg-0.56-0.91-0.89
GSK189075 500 mg-1.90-2.14-2.07
Pioglitazone 30 mg-1.26-1.73-1.71
Placebo-0.49-0.62-0.51

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c (%) at Weeks 4 and 8

Fasted blood samples for HbA1c were collected at Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8. Participants were required to fast for at least 8 hours prior to laboratory samples and were told not to take the morning dose of study medication on these visit days and to refrain from eating until instructed to do so by study personnel in the clinic. When the participant had not fasted, the participant was rescheduled to return to the clinic to have a fasted sample taken. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4 and Week 8

,,,,,,
InterventionPercentage of hemoglobin (Mean)
Week 4Week 8
GSK189075 100 mg-0.69-0.96
GSK189075 1000 mg-0.84-1.28
GSK189075 250 mg-0.64-0.99
GSK189075 50 mg-0.77-0.98
GSK189075 500 mg-0.83-1.07
Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.39-0.88
Placebo-0.30-0.41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Waist Circumference

Waist circumference of participants was measured from Baseline (Week 0) to Week 12 and recorded in the CRF. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. (NCT00500331)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 12

InterventionCentimeters (Mean)
Placebo-0.7
GSK189075 50 mg-1.2
GSK189075 100 mg-2.0
GSK189075 250 mg-2.2
GSK189075 500 mg-2.6
GSK189075 1000 mg-2.4
Pioglitazone 30 mg1.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Index of Static Beta-cell Sensitivity to Glucose After 12 Weeks of Treatment

"Static sensitivity is a measure of the effect of glucose on beta cell secretion and is the ratio between the insulin secretion rate and glucose concentration above the threshold level at steady state.~Percent change from baseline was calculated as the difference between index of static sensitivities at Week 12 and at baseline with respect to the index of static sensitivity at baseline times 100." (NCT00511108)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg71.5
Pioglitazone 30 mg27.0
Sitagliptin 100 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg125.2
Placebo-2.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glucagon 3-hour Total Area Under the Curve (AUC) After 12 Weeks of Treatment

Glucagon concentration was measured at 9 points during an Meal Tolerance Test (MTT), at times -10, 0, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 minutes. Total AUC was calculated over 3 hours including all sample points starting from 0 minutes using the trapezoid method. The change from baseline reflects Week 12 total AUC minus the Week 0 total AUC. (NCT00511108)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionpg*hr/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-17.2
Pioglitazone 30 mg-4.9
Sitagliptin 100 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-29.8
Placebo12.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glucose 5-hour Total AUC After 12 Weeks of Treatment

Glucose concentration was measured at 11 points during an Meal Tolerance Test (MTT), at times -10, 0, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 minutes. Total AUC was calculated over 5 hours including all sample points starting from 0 minutes using the trapezoid method. The change from baseline reflects Week 12 total AUC minus the Week 0 total AUC. (NCT00511108)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionmg*hr/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-209.8
Pioglitazone 30 mg-245.6
Sitagliptin 100 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-389.2
Placebo18.6

[back to top]

Neutrophil Delivery to the Oral Mucosa Using a Non-invasive Mouthwash Technique

Oral mucosal polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) are obtained and assessed using a modification of the mouthwash method of (Wright et.al. Blood 1986;67:1023-30). For each subject, PMN counts are assessed on days 1, 2, 3 [Baseline (B)]; days 8, 9, 10 [Treatment (T)]; and days 11, 13, 15 [Recovery (R)]. The PMN counts for each subject are averaged for each study time period (B, T or R) within each study arm (Pioglitazone, Simvastatin and Ibuprofen). The mean baseline (B) PMN counts are compared to the mean treatment (T) PMN counts for each study arm, with the results expressed as the percent change in PMN counts . Paired T-tests between baseline and treatment PMN counts are used to analyze for significance. The recovery period is used to verify that the PMN counts return to baseline following the treatment period. Data from the recovery period is not shown. (NCT00531882)
Timeframe: 3X Before treatment (Days 1,2,3) 3X During treatment (Days 8,9,10)

Intervention% change in mean PMN counts: B vs T (Number)
1-Pioglitazone6.4
2-Simvastatin-19.6
3-Ibuprofen 1000-1600 mg Twice Daily (Max 3200 mg/Day)-28.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 32

A1C is measured as a percent. Thus this change from baseline reflects the Week 32 A1C percent minus the baseline A1C percent (NCT00532935)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 32

InterventionPercent of glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed-Dose Combination-1.86
Pioglitazone-1.39

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With A1C <7.0% at Week 32

(NCT00532935)
Timeframe: Week 32

InterventionPercent Participants (Number)
Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed-Dose Combination57.3
Pioglitazone43.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 32

Change from baseline reflects the Week 32 FPG minus the baseline FPG (NCT00532935)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 32

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed-Dose Combination-56.0
Pioglitazone-44.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 1

Change from baseline reflects the Week 1 FPG minus the baseline FPG. At Week 1, the dose was 50/500 mg b.i.d. for Sita/Met FDC and 30 mg q.d. for pioglitazone (NCT00532935)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 1

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed-Dose Combination-40.5
Pioglitazone-13.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2-hour Post-Meal Glucose (PMG) at Week 32

Change from baseline reflects the Week 32 2-hour PMG minus the baseline 2-hour PMG (NCT00532935)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 32

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed-Dose Combination-102.2
Pioglitazone-82.0

[back to top]

Change in 2-hour Postprandial Glucose (PMG) in Participants Treated With Sitagliptin or Pioglitazone at 12 Weeks

The change in PMG compared to baseline was measured using the Meal Tolerance Test (MTT) for the participants treated with Sitagliptin or Pioglitazone at Week 12. Sitagliptin was the only intervention administered to the Sita/Met FDC group during this phase. To calculate Least Squares, the ANCOVA model included a term for treatment and the baseline value as a covariate. (NCT00541450)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin (Phase A)-52.8
Pioglitazone (Phase A)-50.1

[back to top]

Change in 2-hour Postprandial Glucose (PMG) in the Sita/Met FDC or Pioglitazone Groups at 40 Weeks

The change in PMG compared to baseline was measured using the Meal Tolerance Test (MTT) for the Sita/Met FDC and the pioglitazone groups at Week 40. (NCT00541450)
Timeframe: Baseline and 40 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sita/Met FDC-90.3
Pioglitazone-69.1

[back to top]

Change in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) in Participants Treated With Sitagliptin or Pioglitazone at 12 Weeks

The change in A1C compared to baseline was measured for the participants treated with sitagliptin or pioglitazone at Week 12. Sitagliptin was the only intervention administered to the Sita/Met FDC group during this phase. A1c represents percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin. (NCT00541450)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin (Phase A)-1.03
Pioglitazone (Phase A)-0.87

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) in the Sita/Met FDC or Pioglitazone Groups at 40 Weeks

The change in FPG compared to baseline was measured for the Sita/Met FDC and the pioglitazone groups at Week 40. (NCT00541450)
Timeframe: Baseline and 40 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sita/Met FDC-45.8
Pioglitazone-37.6

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) in Participants Treated With Sitagliptin or Pioglitazone at 12 Weeks

The change in FPG compared to baseline was measured for the participants treated with sitagliptin or pioglitazone at Week 12. Sitagliptin was the only intervention administered to the Sita/Met FDC group during this phase. To calculate Least Squares, the ANCOVA model included a term for treatment and the baseline value as a covariate. (NCT00541450)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin (Phase A)-26.6
Pioglitazone (Phase A)-28.0

[back to top]

Change in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) in the Sita/Met Fixed-Dose Combination (FDC) or Pioglitazone Groups at 40 Weeks

The change in A1C, compared to baseline for the Sita/Met FDC and the pioglitazone groups at Week 40. A1C represents percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin. (NCT00541450)
Timeframe: Baseline to 40 weeks

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Sita/Met FDC-1.75
Pioglitazone-1.38

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Beck Depression Inventory Fast Screen (BDI-FS) Score ≥ 4 at Each Time Point Assessed

The BDI-FS consisted of seven areas with four statements (labeled 0, 1, 2, and 3) offered to describe the area of interest, with 0 indicating no effect and 3 indicating the worst effect. The individual area scores were summed to provide a total score. The degree of depression was assessed with 0 to 3 indicating minimal depression, 4 to 8 mild depression, 9 to 12 moderate depression and 13 to 21 severe depression. (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48,60,72

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Week 4 (n=61, 71)Week 8 (n=57, 69)Week 12 (n=55, 67)Week 16 (n=50, 62)Week 20 (n=46, 59)Week 24 (n=45, 60)Week 28 (n=46, 59)Week 32 (n=37, 46)Week 36 (n=37, 46)Week 40 (n=42, 44)Week 44 (n=36, 40)Week 48 (n=32, 45)Week 60 (n=1, 3)Week 72 (n=30, 39)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin12.77.211.94.83.410.03.44.36.52.32.5033.37.7
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone6.65.310.96.08.72.28.75.45.44.80003.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2 log10 Decrease in HCV RNA From Initiation of Pegasys Plus Copegus to Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60, 72

Serum samples were collected for HCV RNA. The percentage of participants with a ≥ 2 log10 decrease in HCV RNA from initiation of Pegasys plus Copegus to time point was calculated. (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Initiation of Pegasys plus Copegus, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60, 72

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Weeks 4Week 12Week 24Week 48Week 60Week 72
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin52.176.772.654.841.137.0
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone41.658.451.939.026.026.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Virologic Response

Virologic response was defined as undetectable HCV RNA < 28 IU/mL. Patients with missing HCV RNA values are considered as non-responders. (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60, 72

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Weeks 4Week 12Week 24Week 48Week 60Week 72
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin16.449.363.056.239.738.4
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone6.533.846.839.026.026.0

[back to top]

Change in Log10 HCV RNA Viral Load at Assessments From Randomization to 16 Weeks of Pioglitazone Pretreatment Run-In Period for the Pioglitazone Arm Only

Serum HCV RNA was collected at randomization and during the pioglitazone run-in period at various time points for the with pioglitazone arm only. The change from randomization to each of these time points was calculated. (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week-16),Weeks -12, -8, -4 and 0

InterventionIU/mL (Mean)
Week -12 (n=74)Week -8 (n=68)Week -4 (n=66)Week 0 (n=64)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone-0.010.000.07-0.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α) at Each Time Point Assessed

"Blood was collected for tumor necrosis factor alpha at various time points throughout the study and was used as a measure of insulin resistance (the inability of insulin to control blood sugar levels).~Baseline for the with pioglitazone arm occurred prior to the start of 16 week run-in period and for the without pioglitazone arm prior to the start of anti-HCV therapy. The change from baseline to Weeks 4 thru 72 after the initiation of anti-HCV therapy is calculated." (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48,60,72

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Week 4 (n=56, 41)Week 8 (n=5, 25)Week 12 (n=51, 45)Week 16 (n=5, 4)Week 20 (n=2, 3)Week 24 (n=42, 57)Week 28 (n=12, 12)Week 32 (n=2, 2)Week 36 (n=0, 2)Week 40 (n=7, 1)Week 44 (n=4, 0)Week 48 (n=32, 44)Week 60 (n=1, 2)Week 72 (n=29, 37)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin-0.91.12.80.6-3.5-1.8-0.1-1.02.73.6NA-1.4-1.4-2.0
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone-1.9-3.7-2.0-1.20.7-1.1-0.7-0.8NA-3.3-2.1-2.5-2.4-3.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-β) Levels at Each Time Point Assessed

"Blood was collected for Transforming Growth Factor beta at various time points throughout the study and was used as a measure of insulin resistance (the inability of insulin to control blood sugar levels).~Baseline for the with pioglitazone arm occurred prior to the start of 16 week run-in period and for the without pioglitazone arm prior to the start of anti-HCV therapy. The change from baseline to Weeks 4 thru 72 after the initiation of anti-HCV therapy is calculated." (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48,60,72

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Week 4 (n=56, 41)Week 8 (n=5, 25)Week 12 (n=51, 45)Week 16 (n=5, 4)Week 20 (n=2, 3)Week 24 (n=42, 57)Week 28 (n=12, 12)Week 32 (n=2, 2)Week 36 (n=0, 2)Week 40 (n=7, 1)Week 44 (n=4, 0)Week 48 (n=32, 44)Week 60 (n=1, 2)Week 72 (n=29, 37)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin-7256-13955-11447-14570-11290-13875-9242-1897387241785NA-10149-3612-1347
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone-14891-16224-17666-6164-10653-15976-4071-19750NA-3119-6415-16510-14539-6403

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol Levels at Each Time-point Assessed

"Blood was collected and assayed for fasting serum cholesterol levels at various time points throughout the study and was used as an indicator of lipid control.~Baseline for the with pioglitazone arm occurred prior to the start of 16 week run-in period and for the without pioglitazone arm prior to the start of anti-HCV therapy. The change from baseline to Weeks 4 thru 72 after the initiation of anti-HCV therapy is calculated." (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48,60,72

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Week 4 (n=61, 72)Week 8 (n=58, 69)Week 12 (n=56, 68)Week 16 (n=53, 62)Week 20 (n=46, 59)Week 24 (n=47, 61)Week 28 (n=52, 62)Week 32 (n=38, 47)Week 36 (n=38, 46)Week 40 (n=45, 49)Week 44 (n=37, 43)Week 48 (n=34, 46)Week 60 (n=33, 41)Week 72 (n=30, 39)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin-0.5-0.6-0.6-0.7-0.6-0.7-0.7-0.8-0.7-0.8-0.8-0.70.10.2
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.3-0.3-0.2-0.3-0.4-0.3-0.3-0.2-0.30.00.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Triglyceride Concentrations at Each Time-point Assessed

"Blood was collected and assayed for fasting serum triglyceride levels at various time points throughout the study and was used as an indicator of lipid control.~Baseline for the with pioglitazone arm occurred prior to the start of 16 week run-in period and for the without pioglitazone arm prior to the start of anti-HCV therapy. The change from baseline to Weeks 4 thru 72 after the initiation of anti-HCV therapy is calculated." (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48,60, 72

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Week 4 (n=61, 72)Week 8 (n=58, 69)Week 12 (n=56, 68)Week 16 (n=53, 62)Week 20 (n=46, 59)Week 24 (n=47, 61)Week 28 (n=52, 62)Week 32 (n=38, 47)Week 36 (n=38, 46)Week 40 (n=45, 49)Week 44 (n=37, 43)Week 48 (n=34, 46)Week 60 (n=33, 41)Week 72 (n=30, 39)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin0.40.50.70.60.60.30.40.50.50.40.30.50.30.2
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone0.50.20.20.20.20.50.20.30.10.20.30.2-0.2-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL-cholesterol) Levels at Each Time-point Assessed

"Blood was collected and assayed for fasting serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL-cholesterol) levels at various time points throughout the study and was used as an indicator of lipid control.~Baseline for the with pioglitazone arm occurred prior to the start of 16 week run-in period and for the without pioglitazone arm prior to the start of anti-HCV therapy. The change from baseline to Weeks 4 thru 72 after the initiation of anti-HCV therapy is calculated." (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48,60,72

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Week 4 (n=58, 70)Week 8 (n=57, 66)Week 12 (n=55, 62)Week 16 (n=53, 58)Week 20 (n=46, 56)Week 24 (n=45, 60)Week 28 (n=52, 60)Week 32 (N=38, 44)Week 36 (n=37, 44)Week 40 (n=44, 49)Week 44 (n=36, 43)Week 48 (n=34, 44)Week 60 (n=33, 39)Week 72 (n=30, 38)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin-0.5-0.6-0.5-0.6-0.6-0.6-0.6-0.7-0.7-0.7-0.7-0.70.10.0
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone-0.3-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.40-0.2-0.3-0.2-0.30.10.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Leptin Levels at Each Time Point Assessed

"Blood was collected for leptin at various time points throughout the study and was used as a measure of insulin resistance (the inability of insulin to control blood sugar levels).~Baseline for the with pioglitazone arm occurred prior to the start of 16 week run-in period and for the without pioglitazone arm prior to the start of anti-HCV therapy. The change from baseline to Weeks 4 thru 72 after the initiation of anti-HCV therapy is calculated." (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48,60,72

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Week 4 (n=56, 39)Week 8 (n=5, 22)Week 12 (n=48, 44)Week 16 (n=5, 4)Week 20 (n=2, 3)Week 24 (n=42, 54)Week 28 (n=11, 11)Week 32 (n=2, 2)Week 36 (n=0, 2)Week 40 (n=7, 1)Week 44 (n=3, 0)Week 48 (n=31, 43)Week 60 (n=1, 2)Week 72 (n=29, 36)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin-2.4-3.0-3.8-7.9-4.0-5.0-4.1-4.9-1.511.5NA-5.5-0.61.4
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone-1.8-1.9-3.1-6.4-2.9-5.8-3.7-4.5NA-4.86.0-4.63.41.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) Scores at Each Time Point Assessed

"Insulin resistance (IR) is calculated using the following formula:~HOMA score = (fasting glucose in mg/dL × fasting insulin in μIU/mL) / 405.~Baseline for with pioglitazone arm occurred prior to the start of 16 week run-in period and for without pioglitazone arm prior to the start of anti-HCV therapy. The change from baseline to Weeks 4 thru 72 after the start of anti-HCV therapy is calculated.~A normal patient can have a HOMA score up to 3. A patient with a score of >3 is definitely IR. Patients scoring 2-3 can be IR but other factors may be causing this without being IR." (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48,60,72

,
InterventionHOMA Score (Mean)
Week 4 (n=54, 42)Week 8 (n=3, 25)Week 12 (n=51, 63)Week 16 (n=5, 5)Week 20 (n=2, 3)Week 24 (n=42, 60)Week 28 (n=10, 13)Week 32 (n=2, 2)Week 36 (n=0, 2)Week 40 (n=6, 2)Week 44 (n=4, 0)Week 48 (n=30, 44)Week 60 (n=1, 2)Week 72 (n=27, 35)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin-0.80.6-2.1-9.110.5-1.3-1.04.22.01.0NA-0.35.0-0.1
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone0.6-2.3-2.0-3.24.0-1.80.8-1.8NA0.230.4-1.60.6-2.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL-cholesterol) Levels at Each Time-point Assessed

"Blood was collected and assayed for fasting high-density lipoprotein (HDL-cholesterol) levels at various time points throughout the study and was used as an indicator of lipid control.~Baseline for the with pioglitazone arm occurred prior to the start of 16 week run-in period and for the without pioglitazone arm prior to the start of anti-HCV therapy. The change from baseline to Weeks 4 thru 72 after the initiation of anti-HCV therapy is calculated." (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48,60,72

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Week 4 (n=61, 72)Week 8 (n=58, 69)Week 12 (n=56, 68)Week 16 (n=53, 62)Week 20 (n=46, 59)Week 24 (n=47, 61)Week 28 (n=52, 62)Week 32 (n=38, 47)Week 36 (n=38, 46)Week 40 (n=45, 49)Week 44 (n=37, 43)Week 48 (n=34, 46)Week 60 (n=33, 41)Week 72 (n=30, 39)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin-0.1-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.3-0.3-0.3-0.2-0.2-0.10.1
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.2-0.1-0.2-0.1-0.2-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.10.10.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Free Fatty Acid Levels at Each Time Point Assessed

"Blood was collected for free fatty acids at various time points throughout the study and was used as a measure of insulin resistance (the inability of insulin to control blood sugar levels).~Baseline for the with pioglitazone arm occurred prior to the start of 16 week run-in period and for the without pioglitazone arm prior to the start of anti-HCV therapy. The change from baseline to Weeks 4 thru 72 after the initiation of anti-HCV therapy is calculated." (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48,60,72

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Week 4 (n=55, 35)Week 8 (n=2, 2)Week 12 (n=52, 32)Week 16 (n=5, 3)Week 20 (n=2, 3)Week 24 (n=40, 31)Week 28 (n=11, 5)Week 32 (n=2, 1)Week 36 (n=0, 1)Week 40 (n=8, 1)Week 44 (n=4, 0)Week 48 (n=32, 24)Week 60 (n=1, 0)Week 72 (n=30, 19)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin0.10.00.2-0.10.10.20.1-0.40.2-0.3NA0.0NA0.1
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone0.0-0.1-0.0-0.0-0.5-0.10.00.3NA0.2-0.0-0.20.1-0.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose Levels at Each Time Point Assessed

"Blood was collected for plasma fasting glucose levels at various time points throughout the study and was used as a measure of glycemic control (monitoring the ability of the patient to maintain normal blood sugar levels).~Baseline for the with pioglitazone arm occurred prior to the start of 16 week run-in period and for the without pioglitazone arm prior to the start of anti-HCV therapy. The change from baseline to Weeks 4 thru 72 after the initiation of anti-HCV therapy is calculated." (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48,60,72

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Week 4 (n=58, 70)Week 8 (n=57, 68)Week 12 (n=55, 66)Week 16 (n=53, 61)Week 20 (n=46, 57)Week 24 (n=47, 61)Week 28 (n=51, 62)Week 32 (n=39, 47)Week 36 (n=38, 46)Week 40 (n=44, 50)Week 44 (n=37, 43)Week 48 (n=34, 46)Week 60 (n=33, 41)Week 72 (n=30, 38)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin-0.2-0.1-0.6-0.5-0.3-0.3-0.3-0.5-0.4-0.7-0.2-0.1-0.1-0.1
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone-0.4-0.7-0.8-0.8-0.6-0.5-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.4-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Levels at Each Time Point Assessed.

"Blood was collected for fasting insulin levels at various time points throughout the study and was used as a measure of glycemic control (monitoring the ability of the patient to maintain normal blood sugar levels).~Baseline for the with pioglitazone arm occurred prior to the start of 16 week run-in period and for the without pioglitazone arm prior to the start of anti-HCV therapy. The change from baseline to Weeks 4 thru 72 after the initiation of anti-HCV therapy is calculated." (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48,60,72

,
Interventionpmol/L (Mean)
Week 4 (N=56, 43)Week 8 (N=4, 27)Week 12 (N=52, 65)Week 16 (N=5, 5)Week 20 (N=2, 3)Week 24 (N=42, 60)Week 28 (N=12, 13)Week 32 (N=2, 3)Week 36 (N=0, 2)Week 40 (N=8, 2)Week 44 (N=4, 0)Week 48 (N=32, 46)Week 60 (N=1, 3)Week 72 (N=30, 40)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin-28.47.3-36.0-162.2180.1-29.1-21.241.741.062.2NA-14.391.0-4.8
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone6.4-40.6-34.4-59.0132.6-38.411.8-47.2NA2.0370.5-38.0-13.2-61.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) Concentrations at Each Time Point Assessed

"Blood was collected for a fasting Hemoglobin A1C level at various time points throughout the study and was used as a measure of glycemic control (monitoring the ability of the patient to maintain normal blood sugar levels).~Baseline for the with pioglitazone arm occurred prior to the start of 16 week run-in period and for the without pioglitazone arm prior to the start of anti-HCV therapy. The change from baseline to Weeks 4 thru 72 after the initiation of anti-HCV therapy is calculated." (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48,60,72

,
InterventionPercent (Mean)
Week 4 (n=3, 5)Week 8 (n=4, 28)Week 12 (n=50, 65)Week 16 (n=5, 4)Week 20 (n=1, 4)Week 24 (n=41, 51)Week 28 (n=11, 12)Week 32 (n=2, 2)Week 36 (n=0, 2)Week 40 (n=8, 1)Week 44 (n=7, 0)Week 48 (N=31, 46)Week 60 (N=1, 2)Week 72 (N=29, 38)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin-0.1-1.0-1.5-1.7-1.3-1.5-1.1-1.7-0.5-1.8NA-1.1-0.1-0.1
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone-0.4-0.9-1.1-0.8-0.6-1.0-0.7-1.0NA-0.3-0.7-0.8-0.2-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Adiponectin Levels at Each Time Point Assessed

"Blood was collected for adiponectin at various time points throughout the study and was used as a measure of insulin resistance (the inability of insulin to control blood sugar levels).~Baseline for the with pioglitazone arm occurred prior to the start of 16 week run-in period and for the without pioglitazone arm prior to the start of anti-HCV therapy. The change from baseline to Weeks 4 thru 72 after the initiation of anti-HCV therapy is calculated." (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48,60,72

,
Interventionμg/mL (Mean)
Week 4 (n=56, 39)Week 8 (n=5, 23)Week 12 (n=49, 45)Week 16 (n=5, 4)Week 20 (n=2, 3)Week 24 (n=41, 55)Week 28 (n=11, 11)Week 32 (n=2, 2)Week 36 (n=0, 2)Week 40 (n=7, 1)Week 44 (n=3, 0)Week 48 (n=31, 44)Week 60 (n=1, 2)Week 72 (n=29, 36)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin1.6-1.10.3-1.04.00.2-1.01.50.0-4.0NA0.33.0-0.1
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone13.012.210.79.03.012.54.413.0NA2.93.710.8-1.08.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Virological Relapse at Week 72 (24 Weeks After the End of Anti-HCV Treatment)

Virologic relapse was defined as the reappearance of HCV-RNA in serum after PEG-INF alpha 2a therapy is discontinued in a patient who was HCV-RNA undetectable at the completion of anti-HCV therapy. (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Week 72

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone15.6
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin19.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Virological Breakthrough up to 48 Weeks

Virological breakthrough is a detectable HCV RNA at any time during anti-HCV treatment up to Week 48 after the attainment of undetectable HCV RNA. (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Up to 48 Weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone15.6
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin13.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Nonresponders During the 48 Week Anti-HCV Treatment Period

Nonresponders are defined as patients who did not achieve undetectable HCV RNA during anti-HCV treatment (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Up to 48 Weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone45.5
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin30.1

[back to top]

Change From Initiation of Pegasys Plus Copegus in log10 Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) Viral Load to Week 12 of Anti-HCV Therapy

Serum samples were collected for HCV RNA. The change from initiation of Pegasys plus Copegus to Week 12 in HCV RNA titers were calculated. Randomization for the with Pioglitazone arm occurred prior to the 16 week run-in period and randomization for the without Pioglitazone arm occurred prior to the start of anti-HCV treatment. (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Initiation of Pegasys plus Copegus, Week 12 of anti-HCV treatment

InterventionIU/mL (Mean)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone-3.5
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin-3.7

[back to top]

Change From Initiation of Pegasys Plus Copegus in log10 HCV RNA Viral Load to Week 24 and Week 48 of Anti-HCV Therapy

Serum samples were collected for HCV RNA. The change from Initiation of Pegasys Plus Copegus to Week 24 and Week 48 in HCV RNA titers were calculated. Randomization for the with Pioglitazone arm occurred prior to the 16 week run-in period and randomization for the without Pioglitazone arm occurred prior to the start of anti-HCV treatment. (NCT00545233)
Timeframe: Initiation of Pegasys Plus Copegus, Week 24 and Week 48 of anti-HCV therapy

,
InterventionIU/mL (Mean)
Week 24 (N=60, 72)Week 48 (N=62, 73)
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin-3.9-3.6
PEG-INF Alpha-2a + Ribavirin+ Pioglitazone-4.0-3.5

[back to top]

Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity

"Quantification of disease activity using validated assessments (disease activity score on 28 joints (DAS28) and and C-reactive protein ( CRP) (Inflammatory marker) as a combined score (DAS-28CRP)).~Mean decrease in DAS-28-CRP score when compared to baseline was measured. The range of DAS-28-CRP is 0-10, with 0 meaning no active disease detected and 10 being the most severe active disease detected by joint count and C-reactive protein levels in blood." (NCT00554853)
Timeframe: 8 mo

Interventionmean decrease in DAS28-CRP score (Mean)
All Participants While on Placebo0.15
All Participants While on Study Drug (Pioglitazone).31

[back to top]

Brachial Artery Diameter Change From Baseline in Response to Reactive Hyperemia

This measure represents the percentage change in diameter of brachial artery in response to reactive hyperemia. The data is presented intentionally and only for the results at the conclusion of the study. (NCT00554853)
Timeframe: 8 months

Intervention% changes in diameter of artery (Mean)
Study Drug (Pioglitazone) Then Placebo8.3
Placebo Then Study Drug (Pioglitazone)9.43

[back to top]

Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I is a measure of the total amount of Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I in the blood. Apo A-I was measured as part of the fasting lipid panel. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline
Placebo134.0

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 20 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) -- or blood sugar -- is between 70 and 100 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) for people who do not have diabetes. People with Type 2 diabetes typically have FPG that is too high, so a negative change from baseline and a lower FPG means improvement. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12, week 16, and week 20 post-dose.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2Change from Baseline to Week 2Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 4Week 6Change from Baseline to Week 6Week 8Change from Baseline to Week 8Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 12Week 16Change from Baseline to Week 16
Rivoglitazone 0.5mg164.1157.8-1.0149.4-8.3158.4-0.2153.612.2142.016.0159.033.0

[back to top]

Change in A1c From Baseline Through Week 20 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) levels and mean changes in A1c were used to measure glycemic control. A1c categorical targets are <7.0% and <6.5%. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12, week 16, and week 20 post-dose.

Interventionpercentage of A1c (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2Change in Baseline to Week 2Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 4Week 6Change from Baseline to Week 6
Placebo7.88.20.37.8-0.18.60.2

[back to top]

Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I is a measure of the total amount of Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I in the blood. Apo A-I was measured as part of the fasting lipid panel. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

,,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12
Pioglitazone 15 mg133.0145.3
Pioglitazone 30 mg158.6153.0
Pioglitazone 45 mg149.6158.2
Rivoglitazone 0.5mg146.7144.0
Rivoglitazone 1.0mg139.7141.0
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg142.4149.8

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 20 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) -- or blood sugar -- is between 70 and 100 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) for people who do not have diabetes. People with Type 2 diabetes typically have FPG that is too high, so a negative change from baseline and a lower FPG means improvement. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12, week 16, and week 20 post-dose.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2Change from Baseline to Week 2Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 4Week 6Change from Baseline to Week 6
Placebo218.7210.0-8.7157.5-33.5218.031.0

[back to top]

Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

"High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is a measure of the total amount of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. HDL-C was measured as part of the fasting lipid panel. HDL-C is considered good cholesterol, so a higher score (positive change) means improvement." (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline
Placebo40.2

[back to top]

Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

"High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is a measure of the total amount of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. HDL-C was measured as part of the fasting lipid panel. HDL-C is considered good cholesterol, so a higher score (positive change) means improvement." (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

,,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Change from Baseline Week 12
Pioglitazone 15 mg42.552.312.9
Pioglitazone 30 mg49.451.310.8
Pioglitazone 45 mg47.256.611.1
Rivoglitazone 0.5mg43.949.0-1.0
Rivoglitazone 1.0mg42.445.05.9
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg44.352.813.1

[back to top]

Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Apolipoprotein (Apo) B is a measure of the total amount of Apolipoprotein (Apo) B in the blood. Apo B was measured as part of the fasting lipid panel. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline
Placebo94.0

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 20 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) -- or blood sugar -- is between 70 and 100 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) for people who do not have diabetes. People with Type 2 diabetes typically have FPG that is too high, so a negative change from baseline and a lower FPG means improvement. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12, week 16, and week 20 post-dose.

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2Change from Baseline to Week 2Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 4Week 6Change from Baseline to Week 6Week 8Change from Baseline to Week 8Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 12
Pioglitazone 15 mg173.3160.8-12.5171.4-1.9174.30.7149.2-23.2131.7-25.3
Rivoglitazone 1.0mg160.1149.8-10.5128.6-24.6126.5-30.8129.5-41.3131.0-51.0
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg162.2152.4-13.6145.6-26.2126.9-41.1125.0-35.1120.3-32.5

[back to top]

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I is a measure of the total amount of Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I in the blood. Apo A-I was measured as part of the fasting lipid panel. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Rivoglitazone 0.5mg-14.5
Rivoglitazone 1.0mg-2.8
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg2.8
Pioglitazone 15 mg3.0
Pioglitazone 30 mg0.3
Pioglitazone 45 mg1.4

[back to top]

Change in A1c From Baseline Through Week 20 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) levels and mean changes in A1c were used to measure glycemic control. A1c categorical targets are <7.0% and <6.5%. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12, week 16, and week 20 post-dose.

Interventionpercentage of A1c (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2Change in Baseline to Week 2Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 4Week 6Change from Baseline to Week 6Week 8Change from Baseline to Week 8Week 10Change from Baseline to Week 10Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 12Week 16Change from Baseline to Week 16
Rivoglitazone 0.5mg7.57.60.17.60.27.70.37.20.07.20.07.70.77.70.7

[back to top]

Change in A1c From Baseline Through Week 20 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) levels and mean changes in A1c were used to measure glycemic control. A1c categorical targets are <7.0% and <6.5%. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12, week 16, and week 20 post-dose.

,,
Interventionpercentage of A1c (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2Change in Baseline to Week 2Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 4Week 6Change from Baseline to Week 6Week 8Change from Baseline to Week 8Week 10Change from Baseline to Week 10Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 12
Pioglitazone 15 mg7.77.6-0.17.6-0.07.4-0.27.60.07.6-0.27.2-0.2
Rivoglitazone 1.0mg7.77.90.17.4-0.17.4-0.27.4-0.57.2-0.77.2-0.9
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg7.57.60.17.5-0.07.3-0.17.2-0.27.2-0.37.0-0.2

[back to top]

Percent Change in Total Triglycerides From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Total Triglycerides (TG) is a measure of the total amount of triglycerides in the blood. The equation to calculate total triglycerides is: (total cholesterol-Low-density Lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL- C) - High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL- C)) x 5 = Total Triglycerides. A negative change means improvement. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Rivoglitazone 0.5mg-15.4
Rivoglitazone 1.0mg-34.1
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg-16.8
Pioglitazone 15 mg-20.5
Pioglitazone 30 mg-16.1
Pioglitazone 45 mg-16.2

[back to top]

Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

"Total cholesterol is a measure of the total amount of cholesterol in the blood, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) - the bad cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) - the good cholesterol, and triglycerides. The equation to calculate total cholesterol is: LDL + HDL + (triglycerides/5) = total cholesterol." (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Rivoglitazone 0.5mg8.9
Rivoglitazone 1.0mg-8.5
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg-2.2
Pioglitazone 15 mg-1.6
Pioglitazone 30 mg2.7
Pioglitazone 45 mg7.4

[back to top]

Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

"Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a measure of the total amount of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. LDL-C was measured as part of the fasting lipid panel. LDL-C is considered bad cholesterol, so a lower score (negative change) means improvement." (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Rivoglitazone 0.5mg16.8
Rivoglitazone 1.0mg-1.8
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg-8.6
Pioglitazone 15 mg-5.7
Pioglitazone 30 mg14.5
Pioglitazone 45 mg14.0

[back to top]

Change in A1c From Baseline Through Week 20 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) levels and mean changes in A1c were used to measure glycemic control. A1c categorical targets are <7.0% and <6.5%. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12, week 16, and week 20 post-dose.

,
Interventionpercentage of A1c (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2Change in Baseline to Week 2Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 4Week 6Change from Baseline to Week 6Week 8Change from Baseline to Week 8Week 10Change from Baseline to Week 10Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 12Week 16Change from Baseline to Week 16Week 20Change from Baseline to Week 20
Pioglitazone 30 mg7.57.50.17.4-0.17.2-0.27.2-0.26.8-0.47.0-0.16.9-0.47.0-0.6
Pioglitazone 45 mg7.67.70.17.6-0.07.5-0.27.4-0.37.2-0.37.0-0.87.4-0.87.4-0.6

[back to top]

Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

"Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a measure of the total amount of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. LDL-C was measured as part of the fasting lipid panel. LDL-C is considered bad cholesterol, so a lower score (negative change) means improvement." (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline
Placebo101.7

[back to top]

Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

"Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a measure of the total amount of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. LDL-C was measured as part of the fasting lipid panel. LDL-C is considered bad cholesterol, so a lower score (negative change) means improvement." (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

,,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12
Pioglitazone 15 mg95.782.7
Pioglitazone 30 mg105.8129.8
Pioglitazone 45 mg108.4111.6
Rivoglitazone 0.5mg124.1226.0
Rivoglitazone 1.0mg125.8112.0
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg95.978.5

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

"Total cholesterol is a measure of the total amount of cholesterol in the blood, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) - the bad cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) - the good cholesterol, and triglycerides. The equation to calculate total cholesterol is: LDL + HDL + (triglycerides/5) = total cholesterol." (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline
Placebo162.2

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

"Total cholesterol is a measure of the total amount of cholesterol in the blood, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) - the bad cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) - the good cholesterol, and triglycerides. The equation to calculate total cholesterol is: LDL + HDL + (triglycerides/5) = total cholesterol." (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

,,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12
Pioglitazone 15 mg172.1151.3
Pioglitazone 30 mg201.7213.3
Pioglitazone 45 mg188.1186.6
Rivoglitazone 0.5mg211.3311.0
Rivoglitazone 1.0mg204.9193.0
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg171.6145.8

[back to top]

Change in Total Triglycerides From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Total Triglycerides (TG) is a measure of the total amount of triglycerides in the blood. The equation to calculate total triglycerides is: (total cholesterol-Low-density Lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL- C) - High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL- C)) x 5 = Total Triglycerides. A negative change means improvement. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline
Placebo100.8

[back to top]

Change in Total Triglycerides From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Total Triglycerides (TG) is a measure of the total amount of triglycerides in the blood. The equation to calculate total triglycerides is: (total cholesterol-Low-density Lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL- C) - High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL- C)) x 5 = Total Triglycerides. A negative change means improvement. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

,,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12
Pioglitazone 30 mg221.0161.3
Pioglitazone 45 mg163.090.8
Pioglitazone 15 mg165.782.3
Rivoglitazone 0.5mg293.2179.0
Rivoglitazone 1.0mg214.8180.0
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg156.572.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by System Organ Class and Preferred Term Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first dose of randomized study medication and ongoing adverse events that started prior to the first dose of randomized study medication and increased in severity on or after the first dose of randomized study medication. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 26 post-dose, approximately a total of 27 weeks.

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
LymphadenitisHypothyroidismConjunctivitisEye PruritusOcular HyperaemiaAbdominal PainDry MouthFlatulenceNauseaStomach DiscomfortMalaiseNon-cardiac chest painOedemaOedema peripheralCholelithiasisSeasonal allergyBronchitisFungal infectionFuruncleInfluenzaNasopharyngitisSinusitisUpper respiratory tractViral upper respiratory tract infectionArthropod biteBack injuryBlood creatine phosphokinase increasedHaemoglobin decreasedRed blood cell morphology abnormalBack painFlank painJoint crepitationMuscle twitchingMusculoskeletal painMusculoskeletal stiffnessMyalgiaPain in extremityCarpal tunnel syndromeDizzinessHeadacheInsomniaMood alteredPharyngolaryngeal painHyperhidrosisRashHypertension
Pioglitazone 15 mg0001100000000010000000100001010000000110010010
Pioglitazone 30 mg1000000001000000001000100000000000000000000000
Pioglitazone 45 mg0000000010001200110110100120100011100001100100
Placebo0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Rivoglitazone 0.5mg0010001000100001100001011000001000010001000101
Rivoglitazone 1.0mg0000000000000000000010000000000000000000001001
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg0100010100010100000010200000010101001000000000

[back to top]

Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

"High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is a measure of the total amount of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. HDL-C was measured as part of the fasting lipid panel. HDL-C is considered good cholesterol, so a higher score (positive change) means improvement." (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Rivoglitazone 0.5mg-1.0
Rivoglitazone 1.0mg5.9
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg13.1
Pioglitazone 15 mg12.9
Pioglitazone 30 mg10.8
Pioglitazone 45 mg11.1

[back to top]

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Apolipoprotein (Apo) B is a measure of the total amount of Apolipoprotein (Apo) B in the blood. Apo B was measured as part of the fasting lipid panel. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Rivoglitazone 0.5mg13.2
Rivoglitazone 1.0mg-12.2
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg-11.5
Pioglitazone 15 mg-14.8
Pioglitazone 30 mg0.1
Pioglitazone 45 mg1.7

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 20 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) -- or blood sugar -- is between 70 and 100 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) for people who do not have diabetes. People with Type 2 diabetes typically have FPG that is too high, so a negative change from baseline and a lower FPG means improvement. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12, week 16, and week 20 post-dose.

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2Change from Baseline to Week 2Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 4Week 6Change from Baseline to Week 6Week 8Change from Baseline to Week 8Week 12Change from Baseline to Week 12Week 16Change from Baseline to Week 16Week 20Change from Baseline to Week 20
Pioglitazone 30 mg138.3140.92.6140.32.3134.0-4.0145.67.6122.3-9.8111.0-19.5107.0-25.0
Pioglitazone 45 mg158.5144.7-13.8143.6-20.0146.8-17.1148.3-20.0126.4-29.4133.7-39.3124.0-18.0

[back to top]

Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B From Baseline Through Week 12 Following Rivoglitazone Compared to Pioglitazone as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Apolipoprotein (Apo) B is a measure of the total amount of Apolipoprotein (Apo) B in the blood. Apo B was measured as part of the fasting lipid panel. (NCT00571519)
Timeframe: Baseline up to week 12 post-dose.

,,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12
Pioglitazone 15 mg105.577.7
Pioglitazone 30 mg113.4120.8
Pioglitazone 45 mg108.495.6
Rivoglitazone 0.5mg119.1206.0
Rivoglitazone 1.0mg121.9115.0
Rivoglitazone 1.5mg101.376.5

[back to top]

Effects of Pioglitazone on Changes in BMI

Body Mass Index (BMI) is measured at baseline, in lean and obese subjects, and after pioglitazone in obese subjects (NCT00579813)
Timeframe: Baseline and 10 weeks

Interventionkg/m2 (Mean)
Obese Subjects, Baseline32.4
After Pioiglitazone33.4
Lean Subjects, Baseline22.6

[back to top]

Changes in Muscle Lipid After Pioglitazone

Muscle lipid following biopsy using oil red-O staining. (NCT00579813)
Timeframe: At baseline and 10 weeks

Interventionarbitrary units of oil red O staining (Mean)
Obese Subjects, Baseline7.0
After Pioiglitazone4.6
Lean Subjects, Baseline2.7

[back to top]

Changes in Fat Inflammation Following Pioglitazone

macrophages in fat at baseline, in lean and obese participants, and obese after pioglitazone (in obese) (NCT00579813)
Timeframe: Baseline and 10 weeks

Interventionmacrophages per mm2 by CD68 staining (Mean)
Obese Subjects, Baseline27
After Pioiglitazone19
Lean Subjects, Baseline17

[back to top]

Change in Insulin Sensitivity Using FSIGT

The frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) involves the injection of IV glucose and the frequent measurement of glucose and insulin. (NCT00579813)
Timeframe: Baseline and 10 weeks

InterventionFSIGT units (x10^-4/min/uU/ml) (Mean)
Obese Subjects, Baseline1.7
After Pioiglitazone2.4
Lean Subjects, Baseline7.02

[back to top]

Change in Brachial Arterial Reactivity

Brachial arterial reactivity was measured by ultrasound. A blood pressure cuff was placed around the right forearm. Using the ultrasound probe of the ultrasound, 2-dimensional images clearly defining the anterior and posterior intimal wall of the brachial artery were collected. Flow velocities were then measured using pulsed wave Doppler. The blood pressure cuff previously placed around the patient's right forearm was inflated to 200 mmHg. The cuff remained inflated for 5 minutes as the patient remained motionless and quiet. Prior to deflation, the patient was asked to remain still as flow velocities and 2-dimensional images were obtained immediately following cuff deflation. Then a 0.4 mg sublingual nitroglycerin tablet was given to all patients without a contraindication and all measurements were repeated. (NCT00586261)
Timeframe: After 6 months of treatment

Interventionmm (Mean)
Pioglitazone Arm0.8476
Placebo Arm2.6058

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HBA1c) at Week 24 With Last Observation Carried Forward

HbA1c is measured as percent. Thus this change from baseline reflects the week 24 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent (NCT00631007)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-24

InterventionPercernt (Mean)
INT131 Besylate 0.5 mg-0.3
INT131 Besylate 1 mg-0.6
INT131 Besylate 2 mg-0.9
INT131 Besylate 3 mg-1.0
Pioglitazone HCl 45 mg-0.9
Placebo-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24 With Last Observation Carried Forward.

The change from baseline reflects the Week 24 FPG minus the Week 0 FPG with last observation carried forward. (NCT00631007)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-24

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
INT131 Besylate 0.5 mg-0.3
INT131 Besylate 1 mg-14.6
INT131 Besylate 2 mg-28.9
INT131 Besylate 3 mg-26.9
Pioglitazone HCl 45 mg-33.2
Placebo4.6

[back to top]

Airway Reactivity

Presence and degree of airway hyperresponsiveness assessed by methacholine challenge test. PC20= Methacholine dose at wich the FEV1 deops by > 20% from pre-methacholine baseline values. (NCT00634036)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionmg/ml (Median)
Pioglitazone5.08
Placebo2.37

[back to top]

Exhaled Nitric Oxide Ppb

(NCT00634036)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionppb (Mean)
Pioglitazone27.6
Placebo30.8

[back to top]

FEV1 % Predicted

(NCT00634036)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Intervention% predicted (Mean)
Pioglitazone80.3
Placebo85.2

[back to top]

Juniper Asthma Control Questionnaire

The Juniper Asthma Control Questionnaire is a validated scale ranging from 0 to 6. Higher scores represent poorer asthma control. Values > 1.5 are compatible with poorly controlled asthma (NCT00634036)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Pioglitazone1.62
Placebo1.82

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <=6.0% at Week 26

Percentages of subjects achieving HbA1c target values of <=6.0% at Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly13.8
Sitagliptin9.0
Pioglitazone4.8

[back to top]

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26

Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline (Day 1) to Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.4
Sitagliptin-0.4
Pioglitazone-2.5

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

Absolute change in HbA1c from baseline (Day 1) to Week 26 [Week 26 - Baseline]. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.55
Sitagliptin-0.92
Pioglitazone-1.23

[back to top]

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26

Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline (Day 1) to Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-3.6
Sitagliptin0.2
Pioglitazone-1.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <=6.5% at Week 26

Percentages of subjects achieving HbA1c target values of <=6.5% at Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly38.8
Sitagliptin15.7
Pioglitazone26.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <7% at Week 26

Percentages of subjects achieving HbA1c target values of <7% at Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly58.8
Sitagliptin30.7
Pioglitazone43.6

[back to top]

Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides at Week 26 to Baseline

Ratio of triglycerides (measured in mg/dL) at Week 26 to baseline (Day 1). Log (Postbaseline Triglycerides) - log (Baseline Triglycerides); change from baseline to endpoint is presented as ratio of endpoint to baseline. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 26

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.95
Sitagliptin0.95
Pioglitazone0.84

[back to top]

Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Hypoglycemic Events

Major hypoglycemia: events that, in the judgment of the investigator or physician, resulted in loss of consciousness, seizure, coma, or other change in mental status consistent with neuroglycopenia, in which symptoms resolved after administration of intramuscular glucagon or intravenous glucose, required third-party assistance, and was accompanied by a blood glucose concentration < 54 mg/dL prior to treatment. Minor hypoglycemia: symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia and blood glucose concentration < 54 mg/dL prior to treatment and not classified as major hypoglycemia. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 26

,,
Interventionrate per subject-year (Mean)
Treatment-Emergent Major HypoglycemiaTreatment-Emergent Minor Hypoglycemia
Exenatide Once Weekly0.000.03
Pioglitazone0.000.01
Sitagliptin0.000.12

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26

Change in fasting total cholesterol from baseline (Day 1) to Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.6
Sitagliptin3.1
Pioglitazone6.2

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 26

Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline (Day 1) to Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-31.8
Sitagliptin-16.3
Pioglitazone-27.3

[back to top]

Change in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in fasting HDL from baseline (Day 1) to Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly2.0
Sitagliptin2.0
Pioglitazone6.2

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26

Change in body weight from baseline (Day 1) to Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 26

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-2.31
Sitagliptin-0.77
Pioglitazone2.79

[back to top]

Myocardial Contractility-SBP

Systolic blood pressure; peak vascular pressure during ventricular contraction (NCT00639457)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 16

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline SBPWeek 16 SBP
Pioglitazone114114
Pioglitazone + Exercise Training121114

[back to top]

Myocardial Contractility-LV Ejection Time

Time required to empty the left ventricle into the aorta (NCT00639457)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 16

,
Interventionmsec (Mean)
Baseline LV ejection timeWeek 16 LV ejection time
Pioglitazone296294
Pioglitazone + Exercise Training281305

[back to top]

Myocardial Contractility-DT

Deceleration time; time from the peak of early diastolic filling to baseline (NCT00639457)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 16

,
Interventionmsec (Mean)
Baseline DTWeek 16 DT
Pioglitazone204193
Pioglitazone + Exercise Training214190

[back to top]

Myocardial Contractility-DBP

Diastolic blood pressure; vascular pressure during ventricular relaxation (diastole) (NCT00639457)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 16

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline DBPWeek 16 DBP
Pioglitazone6567
Pioglitazone + Exercise Training6861

[back to top]

Abdominal Subcutaneous Fat Volume

(NCT00639457)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 16

,
Interventioncm3 (Mean)
BaselineWeek 16
Pioglitazone21012164
Pioglitazone + Exercise Training18771905

[back to top]

Myocardial Contractility

E/A ratio; ratio of the early (E) to late (A) ventricular filling velocities (NCT00639457)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 16

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Baseline E/A ratioWeek 16 E/A ratio
Pioglitazone1.31.4
Pioglitazone + Exercise Training1.21.4

[back to top]

Hemoglobin

(NCT00639457)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

,
Interventiong/L (Mean)
Baseline HemoglobinWeek 16 Hemoglobin
Pioglitazone13.813.7
Pioglitazone + Exercise Training13.813.6

[back to top]

Hematocrit

Percentage of blood volume that is red cells (NCT00639457)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

,
Intervention% red cells (Mean)
Baseline HematocritWeek 16 Hematocrit
Pioglitazone39.939.6
Pioglitazone + Exercise Training40.739.7

[back to top]

Serum Adiponectin Levels

(NCT00639457)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 16

,
Interventionµg/mL (Mean)
Baseline serum adiponectinWeek 16 serum adiponectin
Pioglitazone4.77.0
Pioglitazone + Exercise Training4.86.5

[back to top]

Liver Enzyme Levels

(NCT00639457)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 16

,
InterventionU/L (Mean)
Baseline ALTWeek 16 ALTBaseline ASTWeek 16 AST
Pioglitazone38393430
Pioglitazone + Exercise Training34322727

[back to top]

Insulin-stimulated Glucose Disposal Rate

Insulin-mediated glucose disposal rate per kg of fat free mass per min (NCT00639457)
Timeframe: Baseline and week16

,
Interventionµmol glucose/kg FFM/min (Mean)
BaselineWeek 16
Pioglitazone3037
Pioglitazone + Exercise Training3448

[back to top]

Hepatic Lipid Content

(NCT00639457)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 16

,
Interventionpercent of water (Mean)
BaselineWeek 16
Pioglitazone12.110.7
Pioglitazone + Exercise Training8.05.5

[back to top]

Visceral Fat Volume

(NCT00639457)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 16

,
Interventioncm3 (Mean)
BaselineWeek 16
Pioglitazone19331970
Pioglitazone + Exercise Training18901746

[back to top]

Serum Lipid and Lipoprotein Levels

(NCT00639457)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 16

,
InterventionmM/L (Mean)
Baseline TriglyceridesWeek 16 TriglyceridesBaseline Total CholesterolWeek 16 Total cholesterolBaseline LDL cholesterolWeek 16 LDL cholesterolBaseline HDL cholesterolWeek 16 HDL cholesterol
Pioglitazone2.32.54.94.62.82.50.990.98
Pioglitazone + Exercise Training2.11.84.74.52.72.61.061.09

[back to top]

Hepatic Glucose Production Rate

ability of insulin to suppress hepatic glucose production = hepatic insulin sensitivity (NCT00639457)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 16

,
Interventionpercent suppression (Mean)
BaselineWeek 16
Pioglitazone3240
Pioglitazone + Exercise Training3742

[back to top]

HbA1c Change From Baseline to Week 24

HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and previous anti-diabetic medication. (NCT00641043)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 24

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Placebo + Pioglitazone-0.56
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone-1.06

[back to top]

FPG Change From Baseline to Week 12

This change from baseline reflects the Week 12 FPG minus the baseline FPG. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline FPG and previous anti-diabetic medication. (NCT00641043)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Placebo + Pioglitazone-20.5
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone-33.8

[back to top]

FPG Change From Baseline to Week 18

This change from baseline reflects the Week 18 FPG minus the baseline FPG. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline FPG and previous anti-diabetes medication. (NCT00641043)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 18

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Placebo + Pioglitazone-19.3
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone-33.2

[back to top]

FPG Change From Baseline to Week 24

This change from baseline reflects the Week 24 FPG minus the baseline FPG. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline FPG and previous anti-diabetic medication. (NCT00641043)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Placebo + Pioglitazone-18.4
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone-32.6

[back to top]

FPG Change From Baseline to Week 6

This change from baseline reflects the Week 6 FPG minus the baseline FPG. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline FPG and previous anti-diabetic medication. (NCT00641043)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 6

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Placebo + Pioglitazone-17.0
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone-33.3

[back to top]

HbA1c Change From Baseline to Week 18

HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and previous anti-diabetic medication. (NCT00641043)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 18

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Placebo + Pioglitazone-0.55
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone-1.06

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c<7.0 at Week 24

The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 7% at week 24 was calculated for each treatment arm. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 24 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c above 7%. (NCT00641043)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Placebo + Pioglitazone30.5
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone42.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c<6.5% at Week 24

The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 6.5% at week 24 was calculated for each treatment arm. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 24 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c above 6.5% (NCT00641043)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 24

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Placebo + Pioglitazone14.1
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone17.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7.0% at Week 24

The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 7% at week 24 was calculated for each treatment arm. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 24 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c above 7%. Only patients with baseline HbA1c >= 7% (NCT00641043)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Placebo + Pioglitazone30.5
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone42.9

[back to top]

HbA1c Change From Baseline to Week 12

HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 12 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and previous anti-diabetic medication. (NCT00641043)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Placebo + Pioglitazone-0.35
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone-0.85

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <6.5% at Week 24

The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 6.5% at week 24 was calculated for each treatment arm. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 24 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c above 6.5%. Only patients with baseline HbA1c >= 6.5% (NCT00641043)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Placebo + Pioglitazone14.1
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone17.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Have an HbA1c Lowering by 0.5% at Week 24

The percentage of patients with an HbA1c reduction from baseline greater than 0.5% at week 24 was calculated for each treatment arm. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 24 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c reduction less than 0.5%. (NCT00641043)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Placebo + Pioglitazone50.8
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone75.0

[back to top]

HbA1c Change From Baseline to Week 6

HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 6 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and previous anti-diabetic medication. (NCT00641043)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 6

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Placebo + Pioglitazone-0.03
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone-0.41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose

The change in fasting plasma glucose collected at each week indicated relative to baseline. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 16.

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=24; n=20; n=19)Week 8 (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16 (n=24; n=25; n=21)
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-20.669-16.293-17.052
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD-38.826-38.242-38.481
Placebo QD-4.1414.86411.869

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Anti-Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (ICAM)

The change in ICAM collected at each week indicated relative to baseline. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 16.

,,
Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4: 5 minutes prior to meal (n=24;n=21; n=19)Week 16: 5 minutes prior to meal (n=24; n=25;n=21)
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.294-4.140
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD-23.810-16.556
Placebo QD-1.154-2.495

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in e-Selectin

The change in e-Selectin collected at each week indicated relative to baseline. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 16.

,,
Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4: 5 minutes prior to meal (n=24;n=21; n=19)Week 16: 5 minutes prior to meal (n=24; n=25;n=21)
Alogliptin 25 mg QD0.116-1.671
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD-6.437-4.056
Placebo QD1.0411.488

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Postprandial Incremental Area Under the Curve for Total Triglycerides at Week 16.

The change in postprandial (after eating a meal) incremental area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 hours (AUC (0-8h)) postdose at week 16 relative to baseline. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16.

Interventionmg.h/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo QD-39.728
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-346.957
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD-293.439

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at each week indicated relative to baseline. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16.

,,
Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Week 8: fasting (n=23; n=24; n=20)Week 16: 5 minutes prior to meal (n=24;n=25; n=21)
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.55-0.39
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD-1.01-0.95
Placebo QD-0.120.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Adiponectin

The change in adiponectin collected at each week indicated relative to baseline. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 16.

,,
Interventionµg/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4: 5 minutes prior to meal (n=24;n=21; n=19)Week 16: 5 minutes prior to meal (n=24;n=25;n=21)
Alogliptin 25 mg QD0.0000.000
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD0.0060.007
Placebo QD0.0010.000

[back to top]

Postprandial Changes Over Time From Baseline for Glucose

Postprandial changes over time at each week indicated relative to baseline. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 16.

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4: 1 hour postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=19)Week 4: 2 hours postprandial (n=23; n=21; n=19)Week 4: 3 hours postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=18)Week 4: 4 hours postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=19)Week 4: 8 hours postprandial (n=22; n=21; n=19)Week 16: 1 hour postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 2 hours postprandial (n=23; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 3 hours postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=20)Week 16: 4 hours postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 8 hours postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-35.065-24.721-19.367-13.907-6.077-36.189-29.745-16.996-12.517-5.737
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD-65.905-67.718-54.345-48.643-27.856-58.168-61.899-51.891-41.943-19.381
Placebo QD-5.957-4.0493.2002.9300.04611.86717.32418.37910.8493.266

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Postprandial Incremental Area Under the Curve for Total Triglycerides at Week 4.

The change in postprandial incremental area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 hours (AUC(0-8h)) postdose at week 4 relative to baseline. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4.

Interventionmg.h/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo QD-16.291
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-288.490
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD-279.116

[back to top]

Postprandial Changes Over Time From Baseline for Glucagon

Postprandial changes over time at each week indicated relative to baseline. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 16.

,,
Interventionpg/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4: 1 hour postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=19)Week 4: 2 hours postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=19)Week 4: 3 hours postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=19)Week 4: 4 hours postprandial (n=24; n=20; n=18)Week 4: 8 hours postprandial (n=22; n=20; n=19)Week 16: 1 hour postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 2 hours postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 3 hours postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 4 hours postprandial (n=24; n=24; n=21)Week 16: 8 hours postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-14.639-17.015-13.200-4.679-3.789-16.955-20.949-13.602-8.577-5.818
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD-17.704-22.081-15.987-8.860-5.150-17.462-20.66210.84-10.326-9.332
Placebo QD7.2221.7306.6372.0211.0813.318-1.0474.8422.8013.917

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Endothelial Function Through Pulse Wave Tonometry

Pulse wave tonometry performed before the meal and 2 hours postmeal using one recording consisting of 15 to 20 sequentially recorded radial artery waveforms collected at each assessment. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 16: pre-meal (n=23;n=23;n=20)Week 16: 2 hours postmeal (n=24;n=24;n=20)
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-4.70.1
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD-4.2-1.3
Placebo QD-3.6-1.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Anti-Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule (VCAM)

The change in VCAM collected at each week indicated relative to baseline. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 16.

,,
Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4: 5 minutes prior to meal (n=24;n=21; n=19)Week 16: 5 minutes prior to meal (n=24;n=25;n=21)
Alogliptin 25 mg QD2.392-1.441
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD4.84913.665
Placebo QD-37.3515.067

[back to top]

Postprandial Changes Over Time From Baseline for Insulin

Postprandial changes over time at each week indicated relative to baseline. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 16.

,,
InterventionuIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4: 1 hour postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=18)Week 4: 2 hours postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=19)Week 4: 3 hours postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=19)Week 4: 4 hours postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=19)Week 4: 8 hours postprandial (n=23; n=21; n=19)Week 16: 1 hour postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 2 hours postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 3 hours postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 4 hours postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 8 hours postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-5.8673.1610.6525.0922.685-14.368-9.528-9.848-4.7533.163
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD-18.287-28.700-18.842-12.891-6.000-12.162-24.777-23.025-19.329-6.107
Placebo QD-5.0471.4050.6372.999-1.174-8.896-9.2584.4478.4050.495

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High-sensitive C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)

The change in hs-CRP collected at each week indicated relative to baseline. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 16.

,,
Interventionmg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4: 5 minutes prior to meal (n=24; n=21; n=19)Week 16: 5 minutes prior to meal (n=24; n=25;n=21)
Alogliptin 25 mg QD0.631-0.402
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD0.155-0.402
Placebo QD-1.5144.338

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Postprandial C-Peptide

The change in postprandial C-peptide collected at each week indicated relative to baseline. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 16.

,,
Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4: 1 hour postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=19)Week 4: 2 hours postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=19)Week 4: 3 hours postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=19)Week 4: 4 hours postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=19)Week 4: 8 hours postprandial (n=23; n=20; n=19)Week 16: 1 hour postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 2 hours postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 3 hours postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 4 hours postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 8 hours postprandial (n=24; n=24; n=21)
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.300-0.0110.1160.3930.421-1.021-1.006-0.712-0.0680.588
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD-1.199-1.379-1.230-1.173-0.911-0.646-1.055-1.269-1.515-0.761
Placebo QD-0.1060.3110.3760.256-0.063-0.176-0.0110.4920.4960.151

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Postprandial Incremental Area Under the Curve Changes for Lipid Parameters.

The change in postprandial incremental area under the plasma concentration-time curve for very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, VLDL triglycerides, VLDL2 cholesterol, VLDL2 triglycerides, chylomicron cholesterol, chylomicron triglycerides, intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) cholesterol, and IDL triglycerides from 0 to 8 hours postdose at week 4 and week 16 relative to baseline. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 16.

,,
Interventionmg.h/dL (Least Squares Mean)
VLDL triglycerides Week 4 (n=23; n=21; n=19)VLDL triglycerides Week 16 (n=23; n=25; n=21)VLDL cholesterol Week 4 (n=23; n=21; n=19)VLDL cholesterol Week 16 (n=23; n=25; n=21)VLDL 2 triglycerides Week 4 (n=23; n=20; n=19)VLDL 2 triglycerides Week 16 (n=23; n=25; n=21)VLDL 2 cholesterol Week 4 (n=23; n=20; n=19)VLDL 2 cholesterol Week 16 (n=23; n=25; n=21)Chylomicron triglycerides Week 4 (n=23; n=21; n=1Chylomicron triglycerides Week 16(n=23;n=25; n=21)Chylomicron cholesterol Week 4 (n=23; n=21; n=19)Chylomicron cholesterol Week 16 (n=23; n=25; n=21)IDL triglycerides Week 4 (n=22; n=18; n=17)IDL triglycerides Week 16 (n=22; n=23; n=19)IDL cholesterol Week 4 (n=22; n=18; n=17)IDL cholesterol Week 16 (n=22; n=23; n=19)
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-119.009-130.459-14.760-16.365-17.960-18.986-0.709-1.445-115.093-136.626-4.474-5.566-6.771-4.045-0.8080.249
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD-98.758-85.709-10.760-8.747-8.687-23.061-1.073-1.232-108.036-129.991-3.628-4.289-4.410-4.5330.1950.609
Placebo QD-9.48825.194-6.914-4.561-5.221-24.280-2.396-2.1900.617-18.577-0.091-1.43114.667-0.3131.4730.171

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Postprandial Incremental Area Under the Curve for Lipoprotein Parameters.

Postprandial incremental area under the curve changes for very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) Apo B-48, VLDL Apo B 100, VLDL2 Apo B-48, VLDL2 Apo B 100, chylomicron Apo B-48, chylomicron Apo B 100, and intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL) Apo B-48, IDL Apo B 100, and triglyceride-rich remnant (TRR) lipoproteins from 0 to 8 hours postdose at week 4 and week 16 relative to baseline. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 16.

,,
Interventionmg.h/dL (Least Squares Mean)
VLDL apo B-48 Week 4 (n=19; n=12; n=15)VLDL apo B-48 Week 16 (n=19; n=16; n=16)VLDL apo B 100 Week 4 (n=19; n=12; n=15)VLDL apo B 100 Week 16 (n=19; n=16; n=16)VLDL2 apo B-48 Week 4 (n=19; n=12; n=15)VLDL2 apo B-48 Week 16 (n=19; n=16; n=16)VLDL2 apo B 100 Week 4 (n=19; n=12; n=15)VLDL2 apo B 100 Week 16 (n=19; n=16; n=16)Chylomicron apo B-48 Week 4 (n=19; n=12; n=14)Chylomicron apo B-48 Week 16 (n=19; n=16; n=16)Chylomicron apo B 100 Week 4(n=19; n=12; n=14)Chylomicron apo B 100 Week 16 (n=19; n=16; n=16)IDL apo B-48 Week 4 (n=18; n=10; n=13)IDL apo B-48 Week 16 (n=18; n=14; n=14)IDL apo B 100 Week 4 (n=18; n=10; n=13)IDL apo B 100 Week 16 (n=18; n=14; n=14)TRR lipoproteins Week 4 (n=24; n=21; n=19)TRR lipoproteins Week 16 (n=24; n=25; n=21)
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-0.491-0.654-2.670-6.967-0.101-0.1750.507-2.049-0.097-0.113-0.417-0.419-0.247-0.188-2.029-2.876-1.071-12.719
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD-0.312-0.266-2.977-3.265-0.0220.002-0.781-1.793-0.071-0.084-0.389-0.409-0.2230.021-2.7690.073-5.673-7.853
Placebo QD-0.020-0.0550.568-0.453-0.075-0.0790.464-1.155-0.051-0.051-0.123-0.1200.0020.1510.9524.18116.1472.818

[back to top]

Postprandial Changes Over Time From Baseline for Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1)

Postprandial changes over time at each week indicated relative to baseline. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 16.

,,
Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4: 1 hour postprandial (n=20; n=17; n=15)Week 4: 2 hours postprandial (n=21; n=17; n=16)Week 4: 3 hours postprandial (n=21; n=17; n=16)Week 4: 4 hours postprandial (n=21; n=17; n=16)Week 4: 8 hours postprandial (n=19; n=16; n=16)Week 16: 1 hour postprandial (n=21 ; n=20; n=16)Week 16: 2 hours postprandial (n=21; n=21; n=17)Week 16: 3 hours postprandial (n=21; n=21; n=17)Week 16: 4 hours postprandial (n=21; n=21; n=17)Week 16: 8 hours postprandial (n=21; n=21; n=17)
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-5.48-2.93-2.082.86-0.38-4.10-3.75-2.25-1.880.03
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD-4.88-6.41-3.61-0.84-0.72-3.63-3.75-3.17-1.83-1.48
Placebo QD0.520.921.201.76-1.01-0.28-3.59-1.08-0.64-1.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Postprandial Proinsulin

The change in postprandial proinsulin collected at each week indicated relative to baseline. (NCT00655863)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 16.

,,
Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4: 1 hour postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=19)Week 4: 2 hours postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=19)Week 4: 3 hours postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=19)Week 4: 4 hours postprandial (n=24; n=21; n=19)Week 4: 8 hours postprandial (n=23; n=21; n=19)Week 16: 1 hour postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 2 hours postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 3 hours postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 4 hours postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)Week 16: 8 hours postprandial (n=24; n=25; n=21)
Alogliptin 25 mg QD-13.024-12.568-12.987-6.848-5.561-22.812-29.930-27.768-21.862-6.898
Alogliptin 25 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD-41.192-56.478-59.573-52.649-35.159-30.658-45.487-50.058-48.757-28.776
Placebo QD-4.555-0.208-6.735-6.496-5.0822.0813.3365.8638.6716.935

[back to top]

Myocardial Contractile Function During Systole

Echocardiographic quantification of E' wall velocity during systole averaged at the lateral wall and septum (NCT00656851)
Timeframe: Weeks 0 and 16

,
Interventioncm/sec (Mean)
Week 0Week 16
Exercise Training13.113.6
Pioglitazone12.712.8

[back to top]

Myocardial Contractile Function During Diastole

"Echocardiographic quantification of (E/A) early to late diastolic filling velocity. Aria transfer blood to the ventricles in 2 steps:~blood collected in the atria falls into the ventricles when the atrioventricular valves opens. In the left heart, the velocity at which the blood moves during this initial action is called the early or E filling velocity.~residual blood in the atria, is emptied during diastole by atrial contraction. The velocity of the blood during atrial contraction is the A (for atrial) filling velocity. These are expressed as a ratio (E/A). If A exceeds E velocity (ratio <1.0) this is a clinical marker of diastolic dysfunction. This can occur when the left ventricular wall becomes so stiff as to impair proper filling, which can lead to diastolic heart failure." (NCT00656851)
Timeframe: Weeks 0 and 16

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Week 0Week 16
Exercise Training1.41.5
Pioglitazone1.41.4

[back to top]

Fasting Lipids and Lipoproteins

fasting serum triglycerides, LDL-, and HDL-cholesterol concentrations (NCT00656851)
Timeframe: Week 0 and 16

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
triglycerides wk 0triglycerides wk 16LDL-cholesterol wk 0LDL-cholesterol wk 16HDL-cholesterol wk 0HDL-cholesterol wk 16
Exercise Training1851591129038.139.8
Pioglitazone1991821159738.938.8

[back to top]

Fasting Glucose Insulin and HOMA

fasting plasma glucose, insulin concentrations and HOMA-insulin resistance (NCT00656851)
Timeframe: Week 0 and 16

,
Interventionmg/dL µU/mL (Mean)
glucose (mg/dL) wk 0glucose wk 16insulin (µU/mL) wk 0insulin wk 16HOMA-IR wk 0HOMA-IR wk 16
Exercise Training91.986.814.811.83.32.6
Pioglitazone10295.320.511.46.12.8

[back to top]

Myocardial Fatty Acid Utilization Rate

Radio-tracer (11C-palmitate) and positron emission tomography quantification of myocardial fatty acid utilization rate. The rate at which palmitate exits the blood, enters the muscle cells in the left ventricle, and is metabolized (oxidation, re-esterification). (NCT00656851)
Timeframe: Weeks 0 and 16

,
Intervention(nmol palmitate/g heart muscle/min (Mean)
Week 0Week 16
Exercise Training119.8130.4
Pioglitazone119.3129.3

[back to top]

Myocardial Fatty Acid Oxidation Rate

Radio-tracer (11C-palmitate) and positron emission tomography quantification of myocardial fatty acid oxidation rate. (NCT00656851)
Timeframe: Weeks 0 and 16

,
Intervention(nmol palmitate/g heart muscle/min (Mean)
Week 0Week 16
Exercise Training106.397.5
Pioglitazone92.4110.1

[back to top]

Myocardial Fatty Acid Esterification

Radio-tracer (11C-palmitate) and positron emission tomography quantification of myocardial fatty acid esterification as a % of total fatty acid extraction (NCT00656851)
Timeframe: Weeks 0 and 16

,
Intervention(% of total fatty acid extraction) (Mean)
Week 0Week 16
Exercise Training47
Pioglitazone74

[back to top]

Myocardial Glucose Utilization Rate Per Unit Insulin

Radio-tracer (11C-glucose) and positron emission tomography quantification of myocardial glucose utilization rate per unit of plasma insulin. Total glucose utilization rate in the left ventricle of the heart expressed per unit of the circulating plasma insulin concentration. (NCT00656851)
Timeframe: Weeks 0 and 16

,
Intervention(nmol glucose/g heart muscle/min/µU insu (Mean)
Week 0Week 16
Exercise Training11.921.7
Pioglitazone14.915.7

[back to top]

Myocardial Glucose Utilization Rate

Radio-tracer (11C-glucose) and positron emission tomography quantification of myocardial glucose utilization rate. The rate at which glucose exits the blood, enters the muscle cells in the left ventricle, and is metabolized (ATP generation, glycolysis, glycogenolysis, or lactate production). Total glucose utilization rate in the left ventricle of the heart. (NCT00656851)
Timeframe: Weeks 0 and 16

,
Intervention(nmol glucose/g heart muscle/min (Mean)
Week 0Week 16
Exercise Training106.787.2
Pioglitazone109.6109.1

[back to top]

The Proportion of All Subjects With HCV Viral Load < 60 IU/mL at Week 72of Step 2.

(NCT00665353)
Timeframe: Week 72 of Step 2

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
PIO (Step 1) Then PIO+PEG-INF+RBV (Step 2)0.053

[back to top]

The Proportion of All Subjects With HCV Viral Load < 60 IU/mL at Week 24 of Step 2.

(NCT00665353)
Timeframe: Week 24 of Step 2

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
PIO (Step 1) Then PIO+PEG-INF+RBV (Step 2)0.158

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability

Summary of the number of subjects with at least one grade 3 or higher sign/symptom or laboratory abnormality. (NCT00665353)
Timeframe: Step 2 (Up to 72 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PIO (Step 1) Then PIO+PEG-INF+RBV (Step 2)13

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Entry to Week 24 of Step 1 in Homeostasis Model of Assessment - Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

(NCT00665353)
Timeframe: From Entry to Week 24 of Step 1

Interventionmg/dL x uIU/mL / 405 (Median)
PIO (Step 1) Then PIO+PEG-INF+RBV (Step 2)-1.2

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability

Summary of the number of subjects with at least one grade 3 or higher sign/symptom or laboratory abnormality. (NCT00665353)
Timeframe: Step 1 (Up to 24 to 28 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PIO (Step 1) Then PIO+PEG-INF+RBV (Step 2)7

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Entry to Week 24 of Step 1 in Fasting Total Cholesterol and Triglycerides.

(NCT00665353)
Timeframe: From Entry to Week 24 of Step 1

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
24 week change in total cholesterol (n=16)24 week change in triglycerides (n=16)
PIO (Step 1) Then PIO+PEG-INF+RBV (Step 2)5.528.5

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Entry to Week 24 of Step 1 in AST and ALT.

(NCT00665353)
Timeframe: From Entry to Week 24 of Step 1

Interventionx ULN (Median)
24 week change in ALT (n=17)24 week change in AST (n=17)
PIO (Step 1) Then PIO+PEG-INF+RBV (Step 2)-0.14-0.20

[back to top]

Change in Depression Symptom Severity From Baseline to Study Endpoint

Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Clinician rated, 30 item (IDS-C30) score change from baseline to study endpoint. IDS-C30 total scores can range from 0 to 84, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome (NCT00671515)
Timeframe: Week 0 - Week 12

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Pioglitazone-20.9

[back to top]

Change in Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) From Baseline to Study Endpoint

The homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) is a method used to quantify insulin resistance. Insulin resistance is a condition in which cells fail to respond to the normal actions of the hormone insulin. Typically cutoff of HOMA-IR for identifying those with insulin resistance is 2.5. (NCT00671515)
Timeframe: Week 0-Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pioglitazone-0.810

[back to top]

Change in Fasting High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in Fasting HDL from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.01
Metformin0.07
Pioglitazone0.17
Sitagliptin0.04

[back to top]

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26.

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.50
Metformin-0.86
Pioglitazone-2.50
Sitagliptin-0.45

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26

Change in Body Weight from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-2.04
Metformin-2.00
Pioglitazone1.52
Sitagliptin-0.76

[back to top]

Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-Emergent Minor Hypoglycemic Events

Minor hypoglycemia is defined as a sign or symptom associated with hypoglycemia that is either self-treated by the patient or resolves on its own AND has a concurrent finger stick blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) and not classified as major hypoglycemia. Mean event rate = total number of events for all subjects in a treatment regimen / the total number of subject years of exposure for all subjects in that treatment. Standard error = square root of (total number of events / (subject years of exposure)**2). (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26

Interventionevents per subject-year (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.05
Metformin0.00
Pioglitazone0.00
Sitagliptin0.00

[back to top]

Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Major Hypoglycemic Events

Major hypoglycemia is defined as any event that has symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia resulting in loss of consciousness or seizure that shows prompt recovery in response to administration of glucagon or glucose, or documented hypoglycemia (blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L [54 mg/dL]) requiring the assistance of another person because of severe impairment in consciousness or behavior (whether or not symptoms of hypoglycemia are detected by the patient). Mean event rate = total number of events for all subjects in a treatment regimen / the total number of subject years of exposure for all subjects in that treatment. Standard error = square root of (total number of events / (subject years of exposure)**2). (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26

Interventionevents per subject-year (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.00
Metformin0.00
Pioglitazone0.00
Sitagliptin0.00

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol (TC) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in Fasting TC from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.24
Metformin-0.22
Pioglitazone0.09
Sitagliptin-0.01

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

Change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.53
Metformin-1.48
Pioglitazone-1.63
Sitagliptin-1.15

[back to top]

Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides at Week 26 to Baseline

Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides (measured in mmol/L) at Week 26 to baseline. Log(Post-baseline Triglycerides) - log(Baseline Triglycerides); change from baseline to Week 26 is presented as ratio of endpoint to baseline. (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.98
Metformin0.96
Pioglitazone0.85
Sitagliptin0.94

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7% at Week 26

Percentage of patients achieving HbA1c <=7% at Week 26 (for patients with baseline HbA1c >7%). (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly64.2
Metformin57.3
Pioglitazone63.3
Sitagliptin45.5

[back to top]

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26.

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.25
Metformin0.14
Pioglitazone-1.74
Sitagliptin-1.81

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in FSG from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-2.25
Metformin-1.98
Pioglitazone-2.57
Sitagliptin-1.13

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Achieving Glycemic Response Defined as HbA1c <7%

To show that dapagliflozin plus glimepiride results in a larger proportion of participants achieving a therapeutic glycemic response, defined as HbA1c < 7% after 24 weeks of treatment, compared to placebo plus glimepiride. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: At Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride26.8
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride30.3
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride31.7
Placebo + Glimepiride13.0

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change in 2-h Post-challenge Plasma Glucose Rise

To show that dapagliflozin plus glimepiride results in greater reductions in the 2-h post-challenge plasma glucose rise as a response to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) from baseline to Week 24. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride-37.5
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride-32.0
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride-34.9
Placebo + Glimepiride-6.0

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change in Body Weight

To show that dapagliflozin plus glimepiride results in greater reduction in body weight or less weight gain after 24 weeks of treatment when compared to placebo plus glimepiride. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride-1.18
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride-1.56
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride-2.26
Placebo + Glimepiride-0.72

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change in Body Weight for Participants With Baseline Body Mass Index (BMI)≥27 kg/m2

To show that dapagliflozin plus glimepiride results in greater reductions in body weight or less weight gain in participants with baseline BMI ≥27 kg/m2 after 24 weeks of treatment when compared to placebo plus glimepiride. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride-1.17
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride-1.74
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride-2.47
Placebo + Glimepiride-0.80

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change in HbA1c Levels

To assess the efficacy of dapagliflozin compared to placebo as add-on therapy to glimepiride in improving glycemic control in participants with type 2 diabetes, as determined by the change in HbA1C levels from baseline to the end of the 24-week double-blind treatment period. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride-0.58
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride-0.63
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride-0.82
Placebo + Glimepiride-0.13

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

To show that dapagliflozin plus glimepiride leads to greater reductions in FPG after 24 weeks of treatment compared to placebo plus glimepiride. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride-16.8
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride-21.2
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride-28.5
Placebo + Glimepiride-2.0

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference (cm) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

Secondary endpoints were tested using sequential testing procedure and are presented in hierarchical order. Adjusted mean change from baseline in waist circumference at Week 24 (or the last postbaseline measurement prior to Week 24 if no Week 24 assessment was available was determined. Data after rescue medication was excluded from this analysis. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start date and time of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. In cases where time of the first dose or time of the assessment was not available, baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. Waist circumference measurements were obtained during the qualification and lead-in periods and on Day 1 and Week 24 of the double-blind period. (NCT00683878)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventioncm (Mean)
PLACEBO + Pioglitazone1.38
Dapagliflozin 5MG + Pioglitazone0.52
Dapagliflozin 10MG + Pioglitazone-0.17

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Therapeutic Glycemic Response (Hemoglobin A1c [HbA1C]) <7.0% at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

Secondary endpoints were tested using sequential testing procedure and are presented in hierarchical order. Percent adjusted for baseline HbA1c. Therapeutic glycemic response is defined as HbA1c <7.0%. Data after rescue medication was excluded from this analysis. HbA1c was measured as a percent of hemoglobin. Mean and standard error for percentage of participants were estimated by modified logistic regression model. (NCT00683878)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Mean)
PLACEBO + Pioglitazone22.4
Dapagliflozin 5MG + Pioglitazone32.5
Dapagliflozin 10MG + Pioglitazone38.8

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in 120-minute Post-challenge Plasma Glucose (PPG) (mg/dL) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

Secondary endpoints were tested using sequential testing procedure and are presented in hierarchical order. In post oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), glucose was measured as milligrams per deciliter(mg/dL) by a central laboratory. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start date and time of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. In cases where time of the first dose or time of the assessment was not available, baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. PPG measurements were obtained on Day 1 and week 24 in the double-blind period. (NCT00683878)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
PLACEBO + Pioglitazone-14.1
Dapagliflozin 5MG + Pioglitazone-65.1
Dapagliflozin 10MG + Pioglitazone-67.5

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

HbA1c was measured as percent of hemoglobin by a central laboratory. Data after rescue medication was excluded from this analysis. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start date and time of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. In cases where time of the first dose or time of the assessment was not available, baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. HbA1c measurements were obtained during the qualification and lead-in periods and on Day 1 and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in the double-blind period. (NCT00683878)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Intervention% of hemoglobin (Mean)
PLACEBO + Pioglitazone-0.42
Dapagliflozin 5MG + Pioglitazone-0.82
Dapagliflozin 10MG + Pioglitazone-0.97

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Total Body Weight (kg) Among Subjects With Baseline Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 27 kg/m^2 at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

Secondary endpoints were tested using sequential testing procedure and are presented in hierarchical order. Adjusted mean change from baseline in total body weight among subjects with baseline body mass index (BMI) ≥ 27 kg/m^2 at Week 24 (or the last postbaseline measurement prior to Week 24 if no Week 24 assessment was available was determined. Data after rescue medication was excluded from this analysis. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start date and time of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. In cases where time of the first dose or time of the assessment was not available, baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. Body weight measurements were obtained during the qualification and lead-in periods and on Day 1 and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 of the double-blind period. (NCT00683878)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionkg (Mean)
PLACEBO + Pioglitazone1.83
Dapagliflozin 5MG + Pioglitazone0.26
Dapagliflozin 10MG + Pioglitazone-0.07

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Total Body Weight (kg) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

Secondary endpoints were tested using sequential testing procedure and are presented in hierarchical order. Adjusted mean change from baseline in total body weight at Week 24 (or the last postbaseline measurement prior to Week 24 if no Week 24 assessment was available was determined. Data after rescue medication was excluded from this analysis. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start date and time of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. In cases where time of the first dose or time of the assessment was not available, baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. Body weight measurements were obtained during the qualification and lead-in periods and on Day 1 and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 of the double-blind period. (NCT00683878)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionkg (Mean)
PLACEBO + Pioglitazone1.64
Dapagliflozin 5MG + Pioglitazone0.09
Dapagliflozin 10MG + Pioglitazone-0.14

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

Secondary endpoints were tested using sequential testing procedure and are presented in hierarchical order. Fasting plasma glucose was measured as milligrams per deciliter(mg/dL) by a central laboratory. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start date and time of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. In cases where time of the first dose or time of the assessment was not available, baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. FPG measurements were obtained during the qualification and lead-in periods and on Day 1 and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in the double-blind period. (NCT00683878)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
PLACEBO + Pioglitazone-5.5
Dapagliflozin 5MG + Pioglitazone-24.9
Dapagliflozin 10MG + Pioglitazone-29.6

[back to top]

Percent Change From Month 12 to Month 18 in Bone Mineral Density in the Total Proximal Femur by DXA

The change in bone mineral density in the total proximal femur at month 18 relative to month 12. DXA is a means of measuring BMD through x-ray. (NCT00708175)
Timeframe: Month 12 and Month 18.

Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone-0.14
Placebo0.04

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

The change between the fasting plasma glucose value collected at each time frame indicated. (NCT00708175)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12; Month 12 and Month 18.

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline to Month 12 (n=57; n=61)Month 12 to Month 18 (n=54; n=57)
Pioglitazone-2.80.4
Placebo6.0-1.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Converted to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)

Participants were considered to have converted to T2DM if there were ≥2 consecutive post-Baseline FPG measurements ≥126 mg/dL. Participants meeting criteria were tabulated and summarized by Study Period (Treatment and Follow-up). Conversion to T2DM during Treatment Period occurred if either both of the consecutive post-Baseline high FPG values, or the first of the 2 consecutive high values occurred on or before the first day off study drug. Conversion to T2DM occurred during the Follow-up Period if both consecutive high values occurred after at least 1 day after the Treatment Period. (NCT00708175)
Timeframe: Up to 18 months.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Double-Blind Period (n=76; n=75)Follow-up Period (n=63; n=59)
Pioglitazone10
Placebo71

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Bone Mineral Density in the Total Proximal Femur by Dual-Energy-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA)

The change in bone mineral density in the total proximal femur at month 12 relative to baseline. DXA is a means of measuring BMD through x-ray. (NCT00708175)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12.

Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone-0.69
Placebo-0.14

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Fracture

Number of participants with confirmed (through an adjudication process) fractures during the study. Circumstances surrounding the fracture, available X-ray and other diagnostic results and healing status were collected for the adjudication process. (NCT00708175)
Timeframe: Up to 18 months.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone1
Placebo3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 54

(NCT00722371)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 54

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-13.1
Pioglitazone 15 mg-10.5
Pioglitazone 30 mg-24.0
Pioglitazone 45 mg-33.3
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 15 mg-33.9
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 30 mg-37.1
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 45 mg-47.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

(NCT00722371)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-24.3
Pioglitazone 15 mg-19.5
Pioglitazone 30 mg-29.9
Pioglitazone 45 mg-37.4
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 15 mg-41.0
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 30 mg-46.9
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 45 mg-52.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Post-meal Glucose (PMG) at Week 24

PMG was measured using the Meal Tolerance Test (MTT). (NCT00722371)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-51.1
Pioglitazone 15 mg-30.6
Pioglitazone 30 mg-52.5
Pioglitazone 45 mg-66.6
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 15 mg-69.2
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 30 mg-85.5
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 45 mg-93.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) at Week 24

A1C represents the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin. (NCT00722371)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionPercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-1.09
Pioglitazone 15 mg-0.88
Pioglitazone 30 mg-1.21
Pioglitazone 45 mg-1.20
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 15 mg-1.53
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 30 mg-1.63
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 45 mg-1.81

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2-Hour PMG at Week 54

PMG was measured using the Meal Tolerance Test (MTT). (NCT00722371)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 54

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-37.0
Pioglitazone 15 mg-26.7
Pioglitazone 30 mg-46.8
Pioglitazone 45 mg-58.2
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 15 mg-64.7
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 30 mg-69.7
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 45 mg-88.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 54

A1C represents the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin. (NCT00722371)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 54

InterventionPercent of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.93
Pioglitazone 15 mg-0.74
Pioglitazone 30 mg-1.16
Pioglitazone 45 mg-1.23
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 15 mg-1.45
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 30 mg-1.49
Sitagliptin 100 mg/ Pioglitazone 45 mg-1.78

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Small Low Density Lipoprotein Concentration

The change between Small Low Density Lipoprotein collected at final visit or week 24 and Small Low Density Lipoprotein collected at baseline (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID-319.3
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID-321.3
Metformin 850 mg BID-179.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Small Very Low Density Lipoprotein (V1+V2) Concentration

The change between Small Very Low Density Lipoprotein collected at final visit or week 24 and Small Very Low Density Lipoprotein collected at baseline (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID3.05
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID5.9
Metformin 850 mg BID-2.86

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol

The change between Total Cholesterol collected at final visit or week 24 and Total Cholesterol collected at baseline. (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID1.06
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID4.79
Metformin 850 mg BID-2.72

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Very Small Low Density Lipoprotein Concentration

The change between Very Small Low Density Lipoprotein collected at final visit or week 24 and Very Small Low Density Lipoprotein collected at baseline (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID-255.5
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID-255.2
Metformin 850 mg BID-143.8

[back to top]

Median Percent Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein

Measurement for High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein was collected at final visit or week 24 and at baseline. Percent change from baseline is calculated as: [(Week 24 - baseline levels)/baseline]*100 (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercent (Median)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID-36.7
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID-34.0
Metformin 850 mg BID-26.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin

The change between the value of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at final visit or week 24 and Glycosylated Hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID-1.83
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID-0.96
Metformin 850 mg BID-0.99

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Large-Chylomicrons Very Low Density Lipoprotein Concentration

The change between Large-Chylomicrons Very Low Density Lipoprotein collected at final visit or week 24 and Large-Chylomicrons Very Low Density Lipoprotein collected at baseline (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID-1.71
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID-1.97
Metformin 850 mg BID-1.96

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin

The change between the Fasting Insulin value collected at final visit or week 24 and Fasting Insulin collected at baseline. (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionμIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID-3.91
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID-3.18
Metformin 850 mg BID-0.98

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Adiponectin

The change between Adiponectin collected at final visit or week 24 and Adiponectin collected at baseline. (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmcg/ml (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID7.8
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID9.2
Metformin 850 mg BID-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Triglycerides

The change between Triglycerides collected at final visit or week 24 and Triglycerides collected at baseline. (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID-5.95
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID-5.54
Metformin 850 mg BID-1.78

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose

The change between the value of Fasting Plasma Glucose collected at final visit or week 24 and Fasting Plasma Glucose collected at baseline. (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID-39.9
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID-22.2
Metformin 850 mg BID-24.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

The change between High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol collected at final visit or week 24 and High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol collected at baseline. (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID14.20
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID9.88
Metformin 850 mg BID6.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessment - Insulin Resistance

The change between Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance collected at final visit or week 24 and Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance collected at baseline. Homeostasis Model Assessment measures insulin resistance, calculated by insulin times glucose, divided by a constant (22.5). (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercent of insulin resistance (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID-2.704
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID-2.075
Metformin 850 mg BID-1.085

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Intermediate-Density Low Density Lipoprotein Concentration

The change between Intermediate-Density Low Density Lipoprotein collected at final visit or week 24 and Intermediate-Density Low Density Lipoprotein collected at baseline (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID-16.3
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID-11.0
Metformin 850 mg BID-17.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Intermediate-Medium High Density Lipoprotein (H3) Concentration

The change between Intermediate-Medium High Density Lipoprotein collected at final visit or week 24 and Intermediate-Medium High Density Lipoprotein collected at baseline (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionμmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID1.34
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID1.62
Metformin 850 mg BID-0.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Large High Density Lipoprotein (H4+H5) Concentration

The change between Large High Density Lipoprotein collected at final visit or week 24 and Large High Density Lipoprotein collected at baseline (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionμmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID0.70
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID1.02
Metformin 850 mg BID0.52

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Large Low Density Lipoprotein (L3) Concentration

The change between Large Low Density Lipoprotein collected at final visit or week 24 and Large Low Density Lipoprotein collected at baseline. (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID96.0
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID115.7
Metformin 850 mg BID18.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

The change between Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol collected at final visit or week 24 and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol collected at baseline. (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID1.19
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID6.08
Metformin 850 mg BID-1.37

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean High Density Lipoprotein Particle Concentration

The change between High Density Lipoprotein collected at final visit or week 24 and High Density Lipoprotein collected at baseline. (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionμmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID0.28
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID-0.80
Metformin 850 mg BID0.62

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean High Density Lipoprotein Particle Size

The change between High Density Lipoprotein collected at final visit or week 24 and High Density Lipoprotein collected at baseline. (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID0.15
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID0.19
Metformin 850 mg BID0.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Low Density Lipoprotein Particle Concentration

The change between Low Density Lipoprotein particle concentration collected at final visit or week 24 and Low Density Lipoprotein particle concentration collected at baseline. (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID-240.6
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID-217.2
Metformin 850 mg BID-176.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Low Density Lipoprotein Particle Size

The change between Low Density Lipoprotein collected at final visit or week 24 and Low Density Lipoprotein collected at baseline. (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID0.55
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID0.6
Metformin 850 mg BID0.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Very Low Density Lipoprotein Particle Concentration

The change between Very Low Density Lipoprotein collected at final visit or week 24 and Very Low Density Lipoprotein collected at baseline. (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID-2.78
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID0.98
Metformin 850 mg BID-11.30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Very Low Density Lipoprotein Particle Size

The change between Very Low Density Lipoprotein collected at final visit or week 24 and Very Low Density Lipoprotein collected at baseline. (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionnm (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID-2.64
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID-3.79
Metformin 850 mg BID-0.20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Medium-Intermediate Very Low Density Lipoprotein (V3+V4) Concentration

The change between Medium-Intermediate Very Low Density Lipoprotein collected at final visit or week 24 and Medium-Intermediate Very Low Density Lipoprotein collected at baseline (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID-4.07
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID-3.01
Metformin 850 mg BID-6.48

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Medium-Small Low Density Lipoprotein Concentration

The change between Medium-Small Low Density Lipoprotein collected at final visit or week 24 and Medium-Small Low Density Lipoprotein collected at baseline (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID-63.8
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID-66.0
Metformin 850 mg BID-35.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Small High Density Lipoprotein (H1+H2) Concentration

The change between Small High Density Lipoprotein collected at final visit or week 24 and Small High Density Lipoprotein collected at baseline (NCT00727857)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionμmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg/Metformin 850 mg BID-1.78
Pioglitazone 15 mg BID-3.41
Metformin 850 mg BID0.19

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Glucose

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value less than 54 mg/dL. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Old Lina7
New Lina1

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Creatinine Kinase

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value greater than or equal to 3 times the ULN. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Old Lina49
New Lina6

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Creatinine

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value greater than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Old Lina52
New Lina18

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Cholesterol

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value greater than 300 mg/dL. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Old Lina1
New Lina1

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Bilirubin

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value greater than or equal to 2 mg/dL. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Old Lina6
New Lina3

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Aspartate Transaminase (AST)

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value greater than or equal to 3 times the ULN. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Old Lina19
New Lina3

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Amylase

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Old Lina92
New Lina35

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase (AP)

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value greater than or equal to 2 times the ULN. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Old Lina7
New Lina0

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Phosphate

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value less than 0.7 mmol/L (decrease) or a value greater than 1.7 mmol/L (increase). (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
DecreaseIncrease
New Lina811
Old Lina1138

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Alanine Transaminase (ALT)

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value greater than or equal to 3 times the ULN. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Old Lina22
New Lina5

[back to top]

Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 18

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 18

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Old Lina2.13
New Lina-13.92

[back to top]

Frequency of Patients With Investigator-defined Hypoglycaemic Adverse Events

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Old Lina209
New Lina86

[back to top]

Frequency of Patients With Adjudication of Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events

Patients reported with cardiac and cerebrovascular events qualified for adjudication by the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Old Lina82
New Lina37

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 78

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 78

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Old Lina0.12
New Lina-0.49

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 66

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 66

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Old Lina0.14
New Lina-0.44

[back to top]

Frequency of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)

This includes any AEs detected during routine physical examination and electrocardiogram (ECG) procedures. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Patients with any AEsPatients with severe AEsPatients with withdrawal due to AEs (from AE page)
New Lina4652316
Old Lina12535757

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 6

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 6

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Old Lina-0.02
New Lina-0.46

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 54

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 54

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Old Lina0.19
New Lina-0.45

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 42

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 42

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Old Lina0.13
New Lina-0.53

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 30

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 30

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Old Lina0.06
New Lina-0.60

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 18

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 18

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Old Lina0.03
New Lina-0.63

[back to top]

Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 78

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 78

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Old Lina1.90
New Lina-13.64

[back to top]

Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 66

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 66

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Old Lina0.88
New Lina-12.87

[back to top]

Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 6

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 6

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Old Lina1.21
New Lina-15.17

[back to top]

Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 54

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 54

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Old Lina3.44
New Lina-12.62

[back to top]

Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 42

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 42

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Old Lina2.97
New Lina-11.87

[back to top]

Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 30

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 30

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Old Lina1.52
New Lina-16.17

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Haematology: White Blood Cell Count

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value less than 3 * 10^9/L (decrease) or a value greater than 20.1 * 10^9/L (increase). (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
DecreaseIncrease
New Lina101
Old Lina301

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Sodium

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value less than 130 mmol/L (decrease) or a value greater than 160 mmol/L (increase). (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
DecreaseIncrease
New Lina38
Old Lina1613

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Haematology: Platelets

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as value less than or equal to 75 * 10^9/L (decrease) or a value greater than or equal to 700 * 10^9/L (increase). (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
DecreaseIncrease
New Lina00
Old Lina50

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Potassium

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value less than 3 mmol/L (decrease) or a value greater than 5.8 mmol/L (increase). (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
DecreaseIncrease
New Lina050
Old Lina3135

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Calcium

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value less than 1.8 mmol/L (decrease) or a value greater than 3 mmol/L (increase). (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
DecreaseIncrease
New Lina120
Old Lina364

[back to top]

Frequency of Patients With Significant Adverse Events Based on Standardised MedDRA Query (SMQ)

As significant adverse events are considered: renal Aes (SMQ 'acute renal failure'), hypersensitivity reactions ('anaphylactic reactions' and 'angioedema'), hepatic Aes ('hepatitis, non-infectious', 'hepatic failure, fibrosis, cirrhosis and other liver damage-related conditions', 'liver-related investigations, signs and symptoms', 'cholestasis and jaundice of hepatic origin'), severe cutaneous adverse reactions ('severe cutaneous adverse reaction'), pancreatitis ('acute pancreatitis', 'chronic pancreatitis''). (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Renal AEsHypersensitivity reactionsHepatic AEsSevere cutaneous adverse reactionsPancreatitis
New Lina103500
Old Lina2072104

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Lowered HbA1c by at Least 0.5% Over Time

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Old Lina155
New Lina175

[back to top]

Number of Patients With HbA1c<7.0% Over Time

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Old Lina382
New Lina172

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Albumin

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value less than 2.5 g/dL. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Old Lina3
New Lina1

[back to top]

Number of Patients With HbA1c<6.5% Over Time

(NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Old Lina139
New Lina74

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Vital Signs

Vital sign abnormalities (any abnormalities found during PE or ECG are reported with adverse events) (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Old Lina0
New Lina0

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Haematology: Red Blood Cell Count

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value less than 3 * 10^12/L. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Old Lina31
New Lina13

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Haematology: Haemoglobin

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value less than or equal to 11.5 g/dL for male and as a value less than or equal to 9.5 g/dL for female patients. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Old Lina63
New Lina31

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Haematology: Haematocrit

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value less than or equal to 32%. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Old Lina48
New Lina22

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Haematology: Eosinophils

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value greater than or equal to 10%. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Old Lina91
New Lina33

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: γ-Glutamyl-transferase (GGT)

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value greater than or equal to 3 times the ULN. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Old Lina54
New Lina14

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Uric Acid

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value greater than 11 mg/dL for male and as a value greater than 10 mg/dL for female patients. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Old Lina124
New Lina48

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Triglycerides

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value greater than 300 mg/dL. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Old Lina329
New Lina101

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)

For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value greater than or equal to 3 times the ULN. (NCT00736099)
Timeframe: 78 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Old Lina1
New Lina0

[back to top]

Change in Cognitive Performance

Participants were administered a neuropsychological testing battery consisting of assessments in four cognitive domains: memory (Visual Reproduction II, Logical Memory II, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test), language (Boston Naming Test , Category Fluency), visuospatial (Block Design, Picture Completion), and executive function (Trail Making Test B, Digit Symbol Test). Raw test scores for these primary cognitive domain measures were transformed into age-adjusted scaled scores with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation (SD) of 3, with higher numbers indicating better cognitive performance, using the Mayo's Older American Normative Studies data. Cognitive domain scores were calculated as the arithmetic mean of the normatively derived scaled scores for all of the tests in that domain. (NCT00736996)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
Memory domainLanguage domainVisuospatial domainExecutive function domain
Endurance Exercise Training0.70.61.10.7
Pioglitazone0.80.40.31.0
Placebo1.20.40.80.9

[back to top]

Change in Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2 Peak)

Peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak, ml/kg/min) was determined by open circuit spirometry during a standard treadmill stress test (modified Balke protocol). (NCT00736996)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months

Interventionml/kg/min (Number)
Pioglitazone0.9
Endurance Exercise Training3.2
Placebo1.3

[back to top]

Change in Insulin Resistance

Change in whole body glucose disposal rate (mg/kg/min) calculated during a single-stage (40 mU/m2/min), 3-hour hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp (NCT00736996)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months

Interventionmg/kg/min (Number)
Pioglitazone1.7
Endurance Exercise Training0.7
Placebo0.1

[back to top]

Change in Hepatic Steatosis and Hepatic Inflammation/Fibrosis in HIV/HCV Co-infected Patients With Steatosis.

Change in hepatic steatosis and hepatic inflammation/fibrosis in HIV/HCV co-infected patients with steatosis. Change in Hepatic Fat Content measured by MR spectroscopy: 48 weeks compared to Baseline (NCT00742326)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionpercentage of hepatic fat on MRS (Mean)
Pioglitazone-7.43
Placebo-2.17

[back to top]

Change in Insulin Resistance in HIV- and HCV-infected Patients With Steatosis Compared to Placebo

Change in Glucose Area Under the Curve from standard oral glucose challenge ( baseline to 2 hours): Week 48 - Baseline values (NCT00742326)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionmg*120 minutes/dL (Mean)
Pioglitazone-31
Placebo11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Insulin

Change from Baseline in insulin levels following 28 days of active therapy (NCT00760578)
Timeframe: 28 days

InterventionuIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
MSDC-0160 90 mg-5.01
MSDC-0160 220 mg-2.91
Pioglitazone-6.58
Placebo-0.70

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Triglycerides

Change compared to baseline in triglycerides following 28 days of active therapy, as part of a lipid profile assessment (NCT00760578)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
MSDC-0160 90 mg0.12
MSDC-0160 220 mg-0.21
Pioglitazone-0.49
Placebo0.15

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HDL

Change from baseline in HDL following 28 days of active therapy, as part of a lipid profile assessment (NCT00760578)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
MSDC-0160 90 mg0.00
MSDC-0160 220 mg0.11
Pioglitazone0.09
Placebo-0.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FPG

Change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) following 28 days of active therapy (NCT00760578)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
MSDC-0160 90 mg-0.20
MSDC-0160 220 mg-0.97
Pioglitazone-1.38
Placebo-0.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FFAs

Change from baseline in Free Fatty Acids (FFAs)following 28 days of active therapy, as part of a lipid profile assessment (NCT00760578)
Timeframe: After 28 days of active therapy

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Mitoglitazone 90 mg-0.05
Mitoglitazone 220 mg-0.15
Pioglitazone 45 mg-0.19
Placebo-0.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Averaged Postprandial Glucose in Response to a MMT Test

Change from baseline of averaged postprandial glucose (mmol/L) in response to a Mixed-meal tolerance (MMT) test. (NCT00760578)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Mitoglitazone 90 mg0.16
Mitoglitazone 220 mg-0.44
Pioglitazone 45 mg-1.10
Placebo0.51

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Averaged Insulin Levels in Response to a Mixed-meal Tolerance Test

Change from baseline in averaged post prandial insulin levels in response to a mixed-meal tolerance test. (NCT00760578)
Timeframe: After four weeks of active therapy

InterventionuIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Mitoglitazone 90 mg0.74
Mitoglitazone 220 mg-9.77
Pioglitazone 45 mg-12.24
Placebo-1.60

[back to top]

Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) for Insulin Sensitivity

Homa is a measure of insulin sensitivity, using glucose measured in mmol/L and insulin measured in milliUnits per liter (mU/L) Calculated using the formula Glucose * Insulin/22/5 (NCT00763139)
Timeframe: Measured after 8 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pioglitazone Phase Baseline2.83
Pioglitazone Phase After 8 Weeks2.44
Placebo Phase Baseline2.38
Placebo Phase wk 8/203.11

[back to top]

ESR

sed rate (NCT00763139)
Timeframe: baseline and after 8 weeks on either placebo or pioglitazone

Interventionmm/hr (Mean)
Pioglitazone Phase Baseline18.5
Pioglitazone Phase After 8 Weeks17
Placebo Phase Baseline19.5
Placebo Phase After 8 Weeks18.88

[back to top]

Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28)

A measure of disease activity based upon tender joint count of 28 joints, swollen joint count of 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and global disease activity (GH) as reported by participant. Calculation is as follows: DAS28=0.56*sqrt(t28) + 0.28*sqrt(sw28) + 0.70*Ln(ESR) + 0.014*GH (NCT00763139)
Timeframe: Measured after 8 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pioglitazone Phase Baseline4.40
Pioglitazone Phase After 8 Weeks4.03
Placebo Phase Baseline4.57
Placebo Phase wk 8/204.48

[back to top]

C-reactive Protein (CRP)

(NCT00763139)
Timeframe: Measured after 8 weeks of treatment

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Pioglitazone Phase Baseline8.1
Pioglitazone Phase After 8 Weeks5.02
Placebo Phase Baseline7.7
Placebo Phase wk After 8 Weeks8.25

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c Level Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at Week 24

The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo10.1
Lixisenatide28.9

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Symptomatic Hypoglycemia and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia

Symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from a hypoglycemic episode with an accompanying plasma glucose less than 60 mg/dL (3.3 mmol/L) or associated with prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration if no plasma glucose measurement was available. Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was symptomatic hypoglycemia event in which the patient required the assistance of another person and was associated with either a plasma glucose level below 36 mg/dL (2.0 mmol/L) or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration, if no plasma glucose measurement was available. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, for up to 132 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Symptomatic HypoglycemiaSevere Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
Lixisenatide230
Placebo70

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24

Absolute change = HbA1c value at Week 24 minus HbA1c value at baseline. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.34
Lixisenatide-0.90

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Beta-cell Function Assessed by Homeostasis Model Assessment for Beta-cell Function (HOMA-beta) at Week 24

Beta cell function was assessed by HOMA-beta. HOMA-beta (% of normal beta cells function) = (20 multiplied by fasting plasma insulin [micro unit per milliliter]) divided by (fasting plasma glucose [mmol/L] minus 3.5). Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Intervention% of normal beta cells function (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo6.98
Lixisenatide6.72

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24

Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionkilogram (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.21
Lixisenatide-0.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Insulin (FPI) at Week 24

Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.01
Lixisenatide-10.36

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Therapy During Main 24-Week Period

Routine fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceeded the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) were performed. Threshold values - from baseline to Week 8: fasting SMPG/FPG >270 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) (15.0 mmol/L), from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG >240 mg/dL (13.3 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 24: fasting SMPG/FPG >200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c >8.5%. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo11.3
Lixisenatide3.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With at Least 5% Weight Loss From Baseline at Week 24

The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo5.1
Lixisenatide9.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.32
Lixisenatide-1.16

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% at Week 24

The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo26.4
Lixisenatide52.3

[back to top]

Asymmetric Dimethylarginine (ADMA) Level

Labs measured micro moles per liter of ADMA levels in participants. (NCT00770367)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionumol/L (Mean)
Pioglitazone.80
Placebo.75

[back to top]

NOx f2-isoprostanes

Measured oxidative stress - NOx measured by chemiluminescence detection using the Sievers NOA 280i and f2-isoprostanes are isolated by thin layer chromatography and subjected to a highly sensitive and specific gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy method to measusre the oxidative stress (NCT00770367)
Timeframe: 3 months

InterventionOxidative stress (Mean)
Pioglitazone Then Placebo-1.4
Placebo Then Pioglitazone-1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Original).

The change between the value of High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein collected at week 24 or final visit and High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionmg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-0.21
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-0.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol.

The change between HDL-Cholesterol collected at week 24 or final visit and HDL-Cholesterol collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID3.3
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein/Low-Density Lipoprotein Ratio.

The change between High-Density Lipoprotein/Low-Density Lipoprotein Ratio collected at week 24 or final visit and High-Density Lipoprotein/Low-Density Lipoprotein Ratio collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID0.1
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol.

The change between Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol collected at week 24 or final visit and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID9.7
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID11.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Subfractions.

The change between the value of Low-Density Lipoprotein Subfractions collected at week 24 or final visit and Low-Density Lipoprotein Subfractions collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID6.2
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID6.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule.

The change between the value of Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule collected at week 24 or final visit and Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID11.6
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID3.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Matrix Metallo Proteinase-9.

The change between the value of Baseline in Matrix Metallo Proteinase-9 collected at week 24 or final visit and Baseline in Matrix Metallo Proteinase-9 collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID31.4
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID51.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Nitrotyrosine.

The change between the value of Nitrotyrosine collected at week 24 or final visit and Nitrotyrosine collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-2.7
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID32.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Platelet Function.

The change between the value of Platelet Function by PFA 100 collected at week 24 or final visit and Platelet Function by PFA 100 collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionsec (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-30.3
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Soluble CD40 Ligand.

The change between the value of Soluble CD40 Ligand collected at week 24 or final visit and Soluble CD40 Ligand collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionpg/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-40.7
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID102.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Deformability (1.20).

The change between the 1.20 percent value of Erythrocyte (Red Blood Cell) Deformability collected at week 24 or final visit and Erythrocyte Deformability collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID3.2
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-1.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Soluble Intracellular Adhesion Molecule.

The change between the value of Baseline in Soluble Intracellular Adhesion molecule at week 24 or final visit and Baseline in Soluble Intracellular Adhesion molecule collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-13.0
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-3.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure.

The change between Systolic Blood Pressure measured at week 24 or final visit and Systolic Blood Pressure measured at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-2.5
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Thromboxane B2.

The change between the value of Thromboxane B2 collected at week 24 or final visit and Thromboxane B2 collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionpg/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-216.4
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID527.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin.

The change between the value of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 24 or final visit and Glycosylated Hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-0.83
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-0.95

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Intact Proinsulin.

The change between Fasting Intact Proinsulin collected at week 24 or final visit and Fasting Intact Proinsulin collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-5.18
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-0.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucose.

The change between Fasting Glucose collected at week 24 or final visit and Fasting Glucose collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-21.6
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-21.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Deformability (60.00).

The change between the 60.00 percent value of Erythrocyte (Red Blood Cell) Deformability collected at week 24 or final visit and Erythrocyte Deformability collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID2.7
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Deformability (6.00).

The change between the 6.00 percent value of Erythrocyte (Red Blood Cell) Deformability collected at week 24 or final visit and Erythrocyte Deformability collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID3.1
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-1.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Deformability (30.00).

The change between the 30.00 percent value of Erythrocyte (Red Blood Cell) Deformability collected at week 24 or final visit and Erythrocyte Deformability collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID2.5
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Deformability (3.00).

The change between the 3.00 percent value of Erythrocyte (Red Blood Cell) Deformability collected at week 24 or final visit and Erythrocyte Deformability collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID3.3
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-.15

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Deformability (12.00).

The change between the 12.00 percent value of Erythrocyte (Red Blood Cell) Deformability collected at week 24 or final visit and Erythrocyte Deformability collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID2.7
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Deformability (0.60%)

The change between the 0.60 percent value of Erythrocyte (Red Blood Cell) Deformability collected at week 24 or final visit and Erythrocyte Deformability collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID2.4
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Deformability (0.30%).

The change between the 0.30 percent value of Erythrocyte (Red Blood Cell) Deformability collected at week 24 or final visit and Erythrocyte Deformability collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID1.3
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in E-Selectin.

The change between the value of E-Selectin collected at week 24 or final visit and E-Selectin collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-3.7
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure.

The change between Diastolic Blood Pressure measured at week 24 or final visit and Diastolic Blood Pressure measured at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-1.3
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Adiponectin.

The change between Adiponectin collected at week 24 or final visit and Adiponectin collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionμg/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID6.79
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID0.72

[back to top]

The Mean Increase From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol.

The increase in High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol collected at week 24 or final visit and HDL-Cholesterol collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID3.2
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-0.3

[back to top]

Intake of Study Medication Greater Than 80% and Less Than 120%.

The change between the Intake of study medication greater than 80% at week 24 or final visit and Baseline and the Intake of study medication greater than 80% at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID136
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID137

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Von-Willebrand Factor.

The change between the value of Von-Willebrand Factor collected at week 24 or final visit and Von-Willebrand Factor collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-19.5
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID1.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Triglycerides.

The change between the value of Triglycerides collected at week 24 or final visit and Triglycerides collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-40.9
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-16.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (≤ 10 mg/L).

The change between the value of High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein less than or equal to 10 mg/L collected at week 24 or final visit and High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein less than or equal to 10 mg/L collected at baseline. (NCT00770653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID-0.87
Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID0.00

[back to top]

6-month Histology Score

Biopsies were classified into one of the following 8 World Health Organization defined categories to classify the endobronchial lesion and assign a score according to the following scale: 1 = normal bronchial epithelium; 2 = reserve cell hyperplasia; 3 = squamous metaplasia without atypia; 4 = mild dysplasia; 5 = moderate dysplasia; 6 = severe dysplasia; 7 = carcinoma in situ (CIS); and 8 = invasive carcinoma. 1 represents the best outcome and 8 represents the worst outcome. (NCT00780234)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Arm 1: Pioglitazone3.07
Arm 2: Placebo3.71

[back to top]

HbA1c Change

Units are absolute difference in %HbA1c (HbA1c being the percentage of glycated Haemoglobin, reflecting glucose exposure over the last 3 months) (NCT00780715)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionabsolute change in %HbA1c (Mean)
Gliclazide MR-0.42
Sitagliptin-0.58
Pioglitazone-1.04
Metformin-1.59

[back to top]

Pain

"Pain is reported as the mean of four Visual analogue scales, ranging from 0 points (no pain) to 100 points (severe pain)~What is your pain right now?~What is your typical or average pain in the last 12 weeks?~What is your pain level at its best in the last 12 weeks (how close to 0 does your pain get at its best)?~What is your pain level at its worst in the last 12 weeks (how close to 0 does your pain get at its worst)?" (NCT00782795)
Timeframe: 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
week 12week 24week 36week 48week 60
Pioglitazone23.0318.9223.5527.5026.11
Sugar Pill (Placebo)19.3826.3222.8825.4213.15

[back to top]

Glucose Tolerance at 48 Weeks

"Normal = normal plasma glucose and normal glucose tolerance (OGTT).~Impaired category includes all non-diabetic participants with either a) Impaired fasting glucose = fasting plasma glucose >110 mg/dl and <126 mg/dl; or b) Impaired glucose intolerance = 2-hour plasma glucose (OGTT) >140 mg/dl and <200 mg/dl.~Diabetes = fasting plasma glucose >126 mg/dl 2-hour (OGTT) plasma glucose >200 mg/dl." (NCT00782795)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DiabetesImpaired Glucose ToleranceNormal
Pioglitazone556
Sugar Pill (Placebo)222

[back to top]

Glucose Tolerance at 24 Weeks

"Normal = normal plasma glucose and normal glucose tolerance (OGTT).~Impaired category includes all non-diabetic participants with either a) Impaired fasting glucose = fasting plasma glucose >110 mg/dl and <126 mg/dl; or b) Impaired glucose intolerance = 2-hour plasma glucose (OGTT) >140 mg/dl and <200 mg/dl.~Diabetes = fasting plasma glucose >126 mg/dl 2-hour (OGTT) plasma glucose >200 mg/dl." (NCT00782795)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DiabetesImpaired Glucose ToleranceNormal
Pioglitazone448
Sugar Pill (Placebo)232

[back to top]

Number and Percentage of Participants With Steatorrhea

Participants were counted as having steatorrhea if they had either a) positive qualitative fecal fat; or b) 72 hour quantitative fecal fat result with >7g fat in stool in 24hours (NCT00782795)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sugar Pill (Placebo)1
Pioglitazone5

[back to top]

Beta-cell Function

Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA 2) values generated using calculator at https://www.dtu.ox.ac.uk/homacalculator/ (NCT00782795)
Timeframe: 24, 48 weeks

,
InterventionBeta-cell function (%) (Mean)
week 24week 48
Pioglitazone120.59120.68
Sugar Pill (Placebo)110.51121.60

[back to top]

Body Mass Index (BMI)

standard BMI defined as mass in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (NCT00782795)
Timeframe: 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 weeks

,
Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
12 weeks24 weeks36 weeks48 weeks60 weeks
Pioglitazone28.6429.4927.4628.7527.94
Sugar Pill (Placebo)28.0225.5628.5528.2629.20

[back to top]

Pancreas Ultrasound Appearance

"Mean score on a scale of 0 - 10: count of positive Endoscopic Ultrasound(EUS) features:~Parenchymal Features - Only Body and Tail~Calcification (>3 hyperechoic foci >2 mm length & width with shadowing)~Lobularity (>3 well-circumscribed, >5mm structures)~Hyperechoic stranding (>3 hyperechoic lines >3mm in length, seen in > 2 different directions with respect to the imaged plane Parenchymal Features - Head, Body and Tail~Cyst (>2 mm diameter anechoic round or oval structure)~Hyperechoic foci (>3 reflectors, >3 mm long & wide, no shadowing) Ductal Features - Only Body and Tail~Side Branch Dilation (>3 tubular, anechoic, >1 mm structures,Main pancreatic duct (MPD) connects)~Irregular MPD contour (uneven and ectatic in its course)~Hyperechoic MPD margin (hyperechoic in >50% of MPD)~Dilation MPD (>3.5 mm body, >1.5 mm tail*) Ductal Features - Head, Body and Tail~MPD calculi (hyperechoic foci with shadowing contained within MPD)" (NCT00782795)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Sugar Pill (Placebo)4.5
Pioglitazone4.91

[back to top]

Quality of Life

The SF36 (Short Form with 36 questions) QoL scoring system has 36 questions, comprising two main dimensions (Physical Health and Mental Health), further divided by 8 independent scales (Physical functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health). The scales for general health and mental health overlap components of both the two main dimensions (Physical Health and Mental Health). The scales, including the total score and dimensions are scored as a number between 0 and 100, where 0 represents lower limits of functioning and 100 is best functioning possible. Data reported is the average total score. (NCT00782795)
Timeframe: 24, 48 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
week 24week 48
Pioglitazone70.0664.71
Sugar Pill (Placebo)67.7466.0

[back to top]

Insulin Sensitivity Index for Glycemia at 24 Weeks

"Insulin Sensitivity = Index for Glycemia (ISI gly) = 2 / ([INSp x GLYp] + 1).~GLYp = Glycemic 0-2 hr area = sum of normalized (based on institutional values) 0 & 2 hr glucose.~INSp = Insulinemic 0-2 hr area = sum of normalized (based on institutional values) 0 & 2 hr insulin." (NCT00782795)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionnumeric index (Mean)
Sugar Pill (Placebo)0.26
Pioglitazone0.35

[back to top]

Missed Work

Mean days of missed work reported by participants in response to question asking about missed work since the last visit (12 weeks) (NCT00782795)
Timeframe: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 weeks

,
Interventiondays (Mean)
week 12week 24week 36week 48week 60
Pioglitazone00.750.470.50.25
Sugar Pill (Placebo)0.500.710.2000

[back to top]

Insulin Sensitivity (%S)

Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA 2) values generated using calculator at https://www.dtu.ox.ac.uk/homacalculator/; (NCT00782795)
Timeframe: 24 and 48 weeks

,
Interventioninsulin sensitivity (%) (Mean)
24 weeks48 weeks
Pioglitazone51.8346.18
Sugar Pill (Placebo)45.3948.12

[back to top]

Hospitalizations

Mean number of hospitalizations within the prior 12 weeks (NCT00782795)
Timeframe: 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 weeks

,
Interventionhospitalizations (Mean)
week 12week 24week 36week 48week 60
Pioglitazone0.060.060.070.120.06
Sugar Pill (Placebo)00.430.2000

[back to top]

Insulin Sensitivity Index for Glycemia at 48 Weeks.

"Insulin Sensitivity = Index for Glycemia (ISI gly) = 2 / ([INSp x GLYp] + 1).~GLYp = Glycemic 0-2 hr area = sum of normalized (based on institutional values) 0 & 2 hr glucose.~INSp = Insulinemic 0-2 hr area = sum of normalized (based on institutional values) 0 & 2 hr insulin." (NCT00782795)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionnumeric index (Mean)
Sugar Pill (Placebo)0.21
Pioglitazone0.36

[back to top]

Insulin Resistance at 24 and 48 Weeks

Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA 2) values generated using calculator at https://www.dtu.ox.ac.uk/homacalculator/ (NCT00782795)
Timeframe: 24, 48 weeks

,
InterventionHOMA2-IR (Mean)
24 weeks48 weeks
Pioglitazone2.272.42
Sugar Pill (Placebo)2.562.32

[back to top]

PC20

"Airway reactivity will be measured with methacholine challenge testing following ATS guidelines.~This is the concentration of methacholine that produces a 20% decrease in lung function (measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 second)" (NCT00787644)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionmg/ml (Median)
1. Pioglitazone5.08
2. Placebo2.37

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 24

(NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Colesevelam-0.34
Placebo-0.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 8

(NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Colesevelam-0.35
Placebo-0.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 4

(NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Colesevelam-0.28
Placebo-0.11

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving an HbA1c Goal of <7.0%

(NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Colesevelam56
Placebo35

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Decrease of >= 0.5 Percent in HbA1c

(NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Colesevelam147
Placebo106

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Reduction in FPG of >= 30 mg/dL

(NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Colesevelam60
Placebo47

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 16

(NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Colesevelam-0.50
Placebo-0.15

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

In this study a reduction in FPG of at least 30 mg/dL is considered glycemic response. (NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Colesevelam-4.8
Placebo9.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Decrease of >= 0.7 Percent in HbA1c

(NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Colesevelam108
Placebo70

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Levels

(NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionµIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Colesevelam0.2
Placebo0.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting C-peptide

(NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Colesevelam0.1
Placebo0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

HOMA-IR is a calculation of fasting insulin and fasting glucose that shows the level of insulin resistance. Lower numbers are better. (NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventioncalculation (Least Squares Mean)
Colesevelam0.2
Placebo0.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-I)

Apo A-1 is measured in mg/dL (NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of change (Least Squares Mean)
Colesevelam3.2
Placebo-0.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)

Apo B is measured in mg/dL (NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of change (Least Squares Mean)
Colesevelam-5.2
Placebo3.6

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)

HDL-C is measured in mg/dL (NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of change (Least Squares Mean)
Colesevelam2.9
Placebo1.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

LDL-C is measured in mg/dL (NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of change (Least Squares Mean)
Colesevelam-9.1
Placebo7.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C

Non-HDL-C is measured in mg/dL (NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of change (Least Squares Mean)
Colesevelam-5.2
Placebo4.6

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)

TC is measured in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of change (Least Squares Mean)
Colesevelam-3.4
Placebo3.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)

TG are measured in mg/dL (NCT00789750)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of change (Median)
Colesevelam14.1
Placebo2.2

[back to top]

6 Minute Walk Test

6 minute walk test measures the distance that a patient can walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes.It assess the disease severity of the subject at 16 week compared to the baseline. (NCT00825266)
Timeframe: Baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionmeters (Number)
Bosentan-71
Pioglitazone-23

[back to top]

Insulin Resistance Profile Change - Triglyceride:HDL Cholesterol Ratio

insulin resistance measured -triglyceride: HDL cholesterol ratio measures at 16 weeks compared with baseline. (NCT00825266)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionratio (Number)
Bosentan-0.22
Pioglitazone-1.96

[back to top]

NYHA (New York Heart Association Classification) Changes

"New York Heart Classification(NYHA) changes measured at 16 weeks compared with baseline.~NYHA Classification:~NYHA class I:no symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity NYHA class II:Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity NYHA class III:Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, NYHA class IV:Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. {Higher NYHA class represent worse symptoms}" (NCT00825266)
Timeframe: Baseline and 16 weeks

InterventionNYHA class (Number)
Bosentan0
Pioglitazone0

[back to top]

Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (QIDS-SR16) Total Score

The QIDS-SR16 is a 16-item, self report assessment. Total scores can range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome (NCT00835120)
Timeframe: Week 0 - Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone-7.1

[back to top]

Change in the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-CR) Score

Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Clinician rated, 30 item (IDS-C30) score change from baseline to study endpoint. IDS-C30 total scores can range from 0 to 84, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome (NCT00835120)
Timeframe: Week 0 - Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone-16.5

[back to top]

Response Rates on the IDS-CR, Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR)

A participant is considered to have responded if their total score on either the MADRS or QIDS-SR16 decreases by at least 50% between their Week 0 visit and Week 8 visit. (NCT00835120)
Timeframe: Week 0 - Week 8

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone13

[back to top]

Remission Rates Based on IDS-CR, QIDS-SR, and MADRS Scores

A participant is considered in remission if their total score on the MADRS is > 7, their total score on the QIDS-SR16 > 6 and/or their total score on the IDS-CR is > 12 at Week 8. (NCT00835120)
Timeframe: Week 0 - Week 8

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone8

[back to top]

Change in Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar Version (CGI-BP)

"The CGI-BP asks the clinician one question: Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time? which is rated on the following seven-point scale: 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients." (NCT00835120)
Timeframe: Week 0 - Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone-1.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52

The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline FPG values. FPG values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline FPG + Baseline HbA1c category + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionMillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride0.64
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride-1.74
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.69

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + Baseline HbA1c category + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionKilograms (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.40
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride4.43
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 52

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at BL. Based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA): change = treatment + BL HbA1c + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-BL HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. Nine par. with post-BL values obtained >14 days after the last dose or after hyperglycemic rescue were included in the analysis population but were not analyzed for this endpoint. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercentage of HbA1c in the blood (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride0.33
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.80
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.55

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52

The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52) was assessed. Values were carried forward for participants who were rescued or discontinued from active treatment before Week 52. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Week 52

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
HbA1c <6.5%HbA1c <7.0%HbA1c <7.5%
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride2779126
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride3794150
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride41019

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156

The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156) was assessed. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Week 156

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
HbA1c <6.5%HbA1c <7.0%HbA1c <7.5%
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride162645
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride234468
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride135

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 104 and Week 156

The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed FPG values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104, and Week 156

,,
InterventionMillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
Week 104, n=12, 128, 103Week 156, n=9, 88, 71
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.99-0.88
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride-1.98-1.94
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride0.43-0.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 104 and Week 156

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. This analysis used observed body weight values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104, and Week 156

,,
InterventionKilograms (Mean)
Week 104, n=12, 130, 104Week 156, n=9, 90, 71
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.90-1.53
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride6.286.52
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride-2.16-4.47

[back to top]

Time to Hyperglycemia Rescue

Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) could have qualified for hyperglycemia rescue. The conditions for hyperglycemia rescue were as follows: FPG >=280 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) between >=Week 2 and =250 mg/dL between >=Week 4 and =8.5% and a <=0.5% reduction from Baseline between >=Week 12 and =8.5% between >=Week 24 and =8.0% between >= Week 48 and NCT00839527)
Timeframe: From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156)

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride49.57
Pioglitazone + Metformin + GlimepirideNA
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride137.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 104 and Week 156

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed HbA1c values, excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104, and Week 156

,,
InterventionPercentage of HbA1c in the blood (Mean)
Week 104, n=12, 130, 104Week 156, n=9, 89, 71
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.76-0.46
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride-1.09-0.97
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.32-0.10

[back to top]

Effect of Pioglitazone, Exenatide and Combined Pioglitazone and Exenatide on Body Weight

Effect of Pioglitazone, Exenatide and combined Pioglitazone and Exenatide on body weight and beta cell function (NCT00845182)
Timeframe: baseline and 6 months

Interventionkg (Mean)
PIOGLITAZONE5.5
EXENATIDE2.4
PIOGLITAZONE and EXNATIDE2.7

[back to top]

HbA1c

change in HbA1c was measured before and after treatment in three groups (NCT00845182)
Timeframe: baseline and 6 months

Interventionpercent point decrease from baseline (Mean)
Pioglitazone1.37
Exenatide1.09
Drug Pioglitazone and Drug Exentatide1.91

[back to top]

Beta-cell Function

Changes in B-cell function as measured by acute insulin release to glucose (AIRg) (NCT00855010)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionmicroUnits/mL x min (Median)
Pioglitazone101
Placebo Pill494

[back to top]

Hepatic Fat Content

Hepatic fat content was determined by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) using a 1.5 Tesla Philips Intera system. (NCT00855010)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage (Median)
Pioglitazone4.0
Placebo Pill5.8

[back to top]

Bone Mineral Density

Areal Bone Mineral Density at the L2-L4 antero-posterior lumbar spine, left femoral neck and total hip were measured by DXA scan using a Hologic Discovery Instrument scanner. (NCT00855010)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
Interventiong/cm^2 (Mean)
L2-L4 Lumbar spine BMDLeft femoral neckLeft total hip
Pioglitazone1.030.830.96
Placebo Pill1.030.851.02

[back to top]

Visceral Fat Area

Abdominal MRI was performed to quantify visceral fat area at the L2-L3 level. (NCT00855010)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventioncm^2 (Mean)
Pioglitazone302
Placebo Pill273

[back to top]

Subcutaneous Fat Area

Abdominal MRI was performed to quantify subcutaneous fat area at the L2-L3 level. (NCT00855010)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventioncm^2 (Mean)
Pioglitazone243
Placebo Pill378

[back to top]

Pancreatic Fat Content

Pancreatic fat content was determined by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) using a 1.5 Tesla Philips Intera system. (NCT00855010)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionPercentage of fat (Median)
Pioglitazone9.6
Placebo Pill13.0

[back to top]

Disposition Index

Disposition index is a measure of insulin secretion multiplied by insulin sensitivity, both derived from intravenous glucose tolerance test. A higher number means the pancreas is better able to lower blood glucose and a lower number means the pancreas is less able to lower blood glucose (NCT00855010)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionUnitless (Median)
Pioglitazone:410
Placebo Pill:841

[back to top]

Bone Turnover Marker - Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D

Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D was determined by radioimmunoassay (NCT00855010)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Pioglitazone25
Placebo Pill19

[back to top]

Bone Turnover Marker - Intact Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)

Intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. . (NCT00855010)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Pioglitazone:41
Placebo Pill:56

[back to top]

Percent Platelet Aggregation Induced by Arachidonic Acid

Platelet aggregation was performed by the turbidimetric method of Born with simultaneous measurement of ATP release using a Chrono-log Lumi-Aggregometer with AGGRO/LINK for Windows Software version 5.1.6. Platelet rich plasma was placed in a silicone-coated cuvette with constant stirring at 1200 rpm using a siliconized stir bar for measurement of aggregation and ATP release. Aggregation was initiated using arachidonic acid (0.5 mM). At each time point the results are shown for maximum percent aggregation with arachidonic acid for all subjects. Sample 1 was obtained at baseline (BL). Sample 2 was drawn on the same day after ingestion of a single dose of 30 mg of pioglitazone. Sample 3 was obtained 6-9 days later after the subject had ingested a single 81 mg dose of aspirin (ASA), and sample 4 was drawn later that day after ingestion of 30 mg of pioglitazone. (NCT00861341)
Timeframe: at baseline and days 6-9

Interventionmaximum percentage aggregation (Mean)
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4
Pioglitazone With or Without 81mg Aspirin80906029

[back to top]

Percent Platelet Aggregation Induced by Collagen

Platelet aggregation was performed by the turbidimetric method of Born with simultaneous measurement of ATP release using a Chrono-log Lumi-Aggregometer with AGGRO/LINK for Windows Software version 5.1.6. Platelet rich plasma was placed in a silicone-coated cuvette with constant stirring at 1200 rpm using a siliconized stir bar for measurement of aggregation and ATP release. Aggregation was initiated using collagen (2ug.mL). At each time point the results are shown for maximum percent aggregation with collagen for all subjects. Sample 1 was obtained at baseline (BL). Sample 2 was drawn on the same day after ingestion of a single dose of 30 mg of pioglitazone. Sample 3 was obtained 6-9 days later after the subject had ingested a single 81 mg dose of aspirin (ASA), and sample 4 was drawn later that day after ingestion of 30 mg of pioglitazone. (NCT00861341)
Timeframe: baseline and day 6-9

Interventionmaximum percentage aggregation (Mean)
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4
Pioglitazone With or Without 81mg Aspirin89938378

[back to top]

Matsuda Index

Whole body insulin sensitivity as determined by the Matsuda Index (NCT00868140)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
1/Pioglitazaone Treated4.29
2/Placebo0.29

[back to top]

Matsuda Index

"Whole body insulin sensitivity as determined by the Matsuda Index as calculated using the following formula:~10,000 divided by the square root of (FPI* FPG) * (xGPC* xIPC) Where FPI is fasting plasma insulin expressed as uU/ml, FPG is fasting plasma glucose expressed as mg/dL, xGPC is mean plasma glucose concentration after the load and xIPC is the mean insulin concentration after the load.~Values calculated on samples taken at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes of a 2 hour OGTT. Values typically range from 0 to 12 units with higher scores indicating better insulin sensitivity. A value of 2.5 or less is indicative of insulin resistance." (NCT00868140)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
1/Pioglitazaone Treated3.36
2/Placebo3.05

[back to top]

Fasting Serum Insulin (uIU/ml)

Fasting serum insulin (uIU.min/ml) measured at 0, 60 and 120 minutes of a 2 hour OGTT following 6 months treatment with either pioglitazone or placebo (NCT00868140)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionuIU.min/ml (Mean)
1/Pioglitazaone Treated-8.69
2/Placebo-0.24

[back to top]

AUC DCI-IPG (%/Min)

Change in the Area Under the Curve DCI-IPG measurements in blood samples taken at 15 minute intervals during the 2 hour OGTT following 6 months of treatment with pioglitazone or placebo. Values reported as a percentage of bioactivity measured at time 0. Negative values indicate a decrease relative to the time 0 measurement. (NCT00868140)
Timeframe: 6 months

Intervention% bioactivity at time 0 of OGTT (Mean)
1/Pioglitazaone Treated-412.22
2/Placebo-699.45

[back to top]

AUC DCI-IPG (%/Min)

Change in the Area Under the Curve DCI-IPG measurements in blood samples taken at 15 minute intervals during the 2 hour OGTT before treatment with pioglitazone or placebo. Values reported as a percentage of bioactivity measured at time 0. Negative values indicate a decrease relative to the time 0 measurement. (NCT00868140)
Timeframe: Baseline

Intervention% bioactivity at time 0 of OGTT (Mean)
1/Pioglitazaone Treated13162.06
2/Placebo14054.17

[back to top]

Fasting Serum Insulin

Fasting serum insulin (uIU.min/ml) measured at 0, 60 and 120 minutes of a 2 hour OGTT before treatment with either pioglitazone or placebo (NCT00868140)
Timeframe: baseline

InterventionuIU.min/ml (Mean)
1/Pioglitazaone Treated15.04
2/Placebo15.91

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hepatic Enzyme Increased or Abnormal Liver Function Tests

"Liver function tests are groups of clinical biochemistry laboratory blood assays designed to give information about the health of the liver. Liver function test abnormal and hepatic enzyme increased were obtained from adverse event data as reported by investigators based on the reference range of the reporting local laboratory methodology. The vitamin D arm was not analyzed for this outcome measure." (NCT00879970)
Timeframe: From Randomization at Visit 3 to Final Visit (up to 162 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo1
Pioglitazone0
Rosiglitazone1
VITAMIN D PLACEBONA
VITAMIN DNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Need for Hospitalization for Any Reason

Data regarding the need for hospitalization for any reason were collected and were then forwarded to the independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) on a regular basis for unblinded review. (NCT00879970)
Timeframe: From Randomization at Visit 3 to Final Visit (up to 162 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo31
Pioglitazone16
Rosiglitazone24
VITAMIN D PLACEBO19
VITAMIN D32

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Severe Lower Than Normal Blood Glucose Level (Hypoglycemia)

Severe hypoglycemia is defined as hypoglycemia requiring assistance from another person with either a documented plasma glucose <=36 mg/deciliter (2.0 millimole per liter [mmol/L]) or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration. Hypoglycemia data were obtained from outcomes reported by the site. Data regarding hypoglycemia were adjudicated by the EAC and sent to the IDMC on a regular basis for unblinded review. (NCT00879970)
Timeframe: From Randomization at Visit 3 to Final Visit (up to 162 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo0
Pioglitazone2
Rosiglitazone1
VITAMIN D PLACEBO0
VITAMIN D3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Need for Hospitalization for Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Shortness of Breath, Pneumonia, or Angina

CHF is a condition in which the heart is not able to pump adequate blood to meet the body's needs. Shortness of breath is defined as difficulty in breathing. Pneumonia is an infection of the lungs, caused by various microorganisms. Angina is defined as severe chest pain due to lack of adequate blood supply of the heart muscle because of obstruction/spasm of the heart's blood vessels. Data regarding the need for hospitalization due to any of these reasons were adjudicated by the EAC and sent to the IDMC on a regular basis for unblinded review. (NCT00879970)
Timeframe: From Randomization at Visit 3 to Final Visit (up to 162 days)

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CHFShortness of breathPneumoniaAngina
Pioglitazone2111
Placebo1003
Rosiglitazone0201
VITAMIN D210NA
VITAMIN D PLACEBO000NA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Retinopathy Requiring Laser Therapy, a Decline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), Vitrectomy, and Renal Replacement Therapy

Retinopathy is defined as damage to the inner lining of the eye (retina). Decline in eGFR is defined as a >=30% reduction in kidney function. Vitrectomy is a surgery to remove some or all of the fluid (vitreous humor) from the eye. Renal replacement therapy includes all the life-supporting treatments for renal failure. Data on the number of participants with all of these microvascular outcomes were collected at each visit. Data regarding the number of participants with these microvascular outcomes were adjudicated by the EAC and sent to the IDMC on a regular basis for unblinded review. (NCT00879970)
Timeframe: From Randomization at Visit 3 to Final Visit (up to 162 days)

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Retinopathy Requiring Laser TherapyDecline in eGFR >=30%VitrectomyRenal Replacement Therapy
Pioglitazone0800
Placebo12000
Rosiglitazone0900
VITAMIN D01800
VITAMIN D PLACEBO01800

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Components of the Composite Cardiovascular Outcome for Thiazolidinedione (TZD)

An event adjudication committee (EAC) adjudicated all occurrences of the components of the composite cardiovascular (CV; related to heart) outcome for TZD. Components are the first occurrence of cardiovascular death for which a non-heart-related cause has not been identified; non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) (death of heart muscle from sudden blockage of a coronary artery by blood clot not leading to death); and non-fatal stroke (rapidly developing loss of brain function[s] due to disturbance in the blood supply to the brain not leading to death). (NCT00879970)
Timeframe: From Randomization at Visit 3 up to the Final Visit (average of 162 days)

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CV Death/Non-Fatal MI/Non-Fatal StrokeCV DeathNon-Fatal MINon-Fatal Stroke
Pioglitazone (PIO)2002
Placebo5122
Rosiglitazone (RSG)1010
Vitamin D2011
Vitamin D Placebo3111

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Composite Microvascular Outcome

The components of the composite microvascular outcome are retinopathy, decline in eGFR, vitrectomy, and renal replacement surgery. Retinopathy is defined as damage to the inner lining of the eye (retina). Decline in eGFR is defined as a >=30% reduction in kidney function. Vitrectomy is a surgery to remove some or all of the fluid (vitreous humor) from the eye. Renal replacement therapy includes all the life-supporting treatments for renal failure. Data regarding the number of participants with changes in micro blood vessels (composite microvascular outcome) were collected at each visit. (NCT00879970)
Timeframe: From Randomization at Visit 3 to Final Visit (up to 162 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo21
Pioglitazone8
Rosiglitazone9
VITAMIN D PLACEBO18
VITAMIN D18

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Components of the Composite Outcome for Vitamin D

An EAC adjudicated all occurrences of the components of the composite outcome for vitamin D. Components are the first occurrence of death or cancer requiring hospitalization, treatment with medicines (chemotherapy), or surgery. (NCT00879970)
Timeframe: From Randomization at Visit 3 to Final Visit (up to 162 days)

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Death or serious cancerAll deathSerious cancer
Pioglitzaone312
Placebo642
Rosiglitazone110
Vitamin D202
Vitamin D Placebo321

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Fracture

Fracture is defined as a medical condition in which there is a break in the continuity of the bone. Fractures are defined as those breaks that are self reported plus confirmed by an X-ray. Data regarding all occurrences of any fracture were adjudicated by the EAC and sent to the IDMC on a regular basis for unblinded review. (NCT00879970)
Timeframe: From Randomization at Visit 3 to Final Visit (up to 162 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo2
Pioglitazone2
Rosiglitazone3
VITAMIN D PLACEBO3
VITAMIN D3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Revascularization

Revascularization is defined as any surgical procedure for the provision of a new, additional, or augmented blood supply to heart muscle. Data regarding the need for any revascularization were adjudicated by the EAC and sent to the data monitoring committee (IDMC) on a regular basis for unblinded review. (NCT00879970)
Timeframe: From Randomization at Visit 3 to Final Visit (up to 162 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo6
Pioglitazone3
Rosiglitazone5
VITAMIN D PLACEBO7
VITAMIN D5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Proteinuria

Clinical proteinuria is defined as a laboratory detection of urinary protein excretion > 0.5 grams (g) per 24 hours; spot urine analysis for albumin:creatinine ratio >=300 milligrams/g; timed urine collection for albumin excretion >=200 µg/minute or >=300 mg/24 hours. Clinical proteinuria data were obtained from outcomes reported by the site. (NCT00879970)
Timeframe: From Randomization at Visit 3 to Final Visit (up to 162 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo1
Pioglitazone0
Rosiglitazone0
VITAMIN D PLACEBONA
VITAMIN DNA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Post-Meal Glucose (PMG) at Week 26

Change from baseline reflects the Week 26 value minus the baseline value. (NCT00885352)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-54.4
Placebo-14.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26

Change from baseline reflects the Week 26 value minus the baseline value. (NCT00885352)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-20.3
Placebo-2.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) at Week 26

Change from baseline reflects the Week 26 value minus the baseline value. A1C represents the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin. (NCT00885352)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercent of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-1.15
Placebo-0.40

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Here are the number of participants with adverse events. For details about the adverse events see the adverse event module. (NCT00923949)
Timeframe: 58 days

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone1

[back to top]

βCTX (Carboxy Terminal Collagen Crosslinks), Osteocalcin, and Adiponectin.

(NCT00927355)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Mean)
Pioglitazone-Adiponectin78.7
Placebo-Adiponectin-0.6
Pioglitazone-CTX-9.2
Placebo-CTX0.2
Pioglitazone-OSc3.6
Placebo - Osc-5

[back to top]

Bone Mineral Density

(NCT00927355)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercent change from baseline to 6 months (Mean)
Pioglitazone-Femoral Neck BMD-4
Placebo-Femoral Neck BMD-2.6
Pioglitazone -Lumbar Spine BMD-1.1
Placebo - Lumbar Spine BMD1.9

[back to top]

Percent Change in Number of Osteoblast and Adipocyte Colony Forming Units Cultured From Bone Marrow Stem Cells Harvested 6 Months After Treatment With Study Drug Compared to Baseline

To determine the effect of PIO (pioglitazone) on BMSC (bone marrow stem cell) lineage choice in vivo, a bone marrow aspiration was obtained from patients at baseline and after 6 months of treatment with PIO or placebo. The bone marrow was used for ex vivo CFU-OB (Colony forming units-Osteoblast) and CFU-AD assays using the same protocol described for the in vitro studies previously. We also analyzed the number of total colonies per patient at both baseline and final visit. (NCT00927355)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercent change from baseline to 6months (Mean)
Pioglitazone-Osteoblast CFU (Colony Forming Units)0
Placebo-OSteoblast CFU12
Pioglitazone-Adipocyte CFU4
Placebo-Adipocyte CFU-7

[back to top]

Dichotomized Histologic Response (HR): Participant Complete or Partial Response Defined as =/>50% Reduction in the Sum of the Measured Products of Perpendicular Dimensions of the Target Lesion(s) or Improvement in the Degree of Dysplasia or Hyperplasia

HR according to criteria & recorded as Response or No Response, analyzed as dichotomous variable. CR: Complete reversal dysplasia/hyperplasia to normal epithelium in all biopsied lesions. PR: Improvement of degree dysplasia/hyperplasia in all biopsied lesion from advanced to early, or from early to normal epithelium in some lesions while other biopsied lesions remain stable. No Change (NC): No change in degree dysplasia/hyperplasia in all biopsied lesions, anything not CR, PR or PD. Progressive Disease (PD): Any increase in severity histology grade any biopsied lesion. Early premalignant lesion: lesion defined high risk, indicated by presence of one: hyperplasia at high-risk sites (dorsal, lateral or ventral tongue, or floor of mouth) ONLY, or mild dysplasia. Advanced premalignant lesion: lesion with presence of one: moderate dysplasia or severe dysplasia (excluding CIS), erythroplakia with hyperplasia or of any severity of dysplasia. (NCT00951379)
Timeframe: Response assessed at Week 24 ±1 Week

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ResponseNo Response
Arm I (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride)224
Arm II (Placebo)223

[back to top]

Biomarker Measurements at Scheduled Visits: Tissue Levels of B-cell Lymphoma 2 (Bcl2)

Tissue levels of Bcl2 as indirect measures of pharmacological effect assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Tissue levels of biomarkers assessed from the biopsy obtained at the Screening Clinic Visit and Week 24 ± 1 Week, and plasma levels of biomarkers assessed from blood collected at the Baseline Clinic Visit and Week 24 ± 1 Week. Data reported a percentage of cells staining positive, according to nuclear or cytoplasmic compartments. (NCT00951379)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study, 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of staining cells positive (Mean)
Pioglitazone: Baseline2.8
Pioglitazone: End of Study2.3
Placebo: Baseline4.2
Placebo: End of Study4.6

[back to top]

Biomarker Measurements at Scheduled Visits: Tissue Levels of Cyclin D1

Tissue levels of Cyclin D1 as indirect measures of pharmacological effect assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Tissue levels of biomarkers assessed from the biopsy obtained at the Screening Clinic Visit and Week 24 ± 1 Week, and plasma levels of biomarkers assessed from blood collected at the Baseline Clinic Visit and Week 24 ± 1 Week. Data reported as percentage of cells staining positive, according to nuclear or cytoplasmic compartments. (NCT00951379)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study, 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of staining cells positive (Mean)
Pioglitazone: Baseline15.5
Pioglitazone: End of Study12.7
Placebo: Baseline12.8
Placebo: End of Study12.9

[back to top]

Biomarker Measurements at Scheduled Visits: Tissue Levels of Ki-67

Tissue levels of Ki-67 for proliferation assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Tissue levels of biomarkers assessed from the biopsy obtained at the Screening Clinic Visit and Week 24 ± 1 Week, and plasma levels of biomarkers assessed from blood collected at the Baseline Clinic Visit and Week 24 ± 1 Week. Data reported as percentage of cells staining positive, according to nuclear or cytoplasmic compartments. (NCT00951379)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study, 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of staining cells positive (Mean)
Pioglitazone: Baseline9.2
Pioglitazone: End of Study8.9
Placebo: Baseline10.7
Placebo: End of Study8.2

[back to top]

Biomarker Measurements at Scheduled Visits: Tissue Levels of p21

Tissue levels of p21 as indirect measures of pharmacological effect assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Tissue levels of biomarkers assessed from the biopsy obtained at the Screening Clinic Visit and Week 24 ± 1 Week, and plasma levels of biomarkers assessed from blood collected at the Baseline Clinic Visit and Week 24 ± 1 Week. Data reported as percentage of cells staining positive, according to nuclear or cytoplasmic compartments. (NCT00951379)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study, 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of staining cells positive (Mean)
Pioglitazone: Baseline18.7
Pioglitazone: End of Study19.3
Placebo: Baseline17.7
Placebo: End of Study15.6

[back to top]

Dichotomized Clinical Response: Participant Complete or Partial Response Defined as =/>50% Reduction in the Sum of the Measured Products of Perpendicular Dimensions of the Target Lesion(s) or Improvement in the Degree of Dysplasia or Hyperplasia

Clinical Response assessed according to criteria & recorded as Response or No Response, analyzed as dichotomous variable. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all evidence of target AND non-target lesions. Partial Response (PR): greater than or equal to 50% reduction in the sum of the products of diameters of all target lesion(s). Non-target lesions may not increase greater than or equal 25% in size and no new lesion may appear. No Change (NC): No change in the size of the lesion(s) and no new lesions appearing, i.e. anything that is not CR, PR or PD. Progressive Disease (PD): Any increase greater than or equal to 25% in the product of the diameters of any measurable lesions or in the estimated size of non-measurable lesions or the appearance of an unequivocal new lesion. (NCT00951379)
Timeframe: Response assessed at Week 24 ±1 Week

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ResponseNo Response
Arm I (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride)1115
Arm II (Placebo)817

[back to top]

Overall Response

Overall Dichotomized Clinical and Histologic Response defined as 50% or greater reduction in sum of the measured products of perpendicular dimensions of the target lesion(s) or improvement in the degree of dysplasia or hyperplasia where complete (CR) or partial response (PR) in either clinical or histologic outcome assessed according to criteria given recorded as Response or No Response and analyzed as a dichotomous variable. Clinical Response = CR: Disappearance all evidence target & non-target lesions; PR: >/=50% reduction in sum products of diameters all target lesion(s). Non-target lesions may not increase >/=25% in size & no new lesion. Histologic Response = CR: Complete reversal of dysplasia or hyperplasia to normal epithelium in all biopsied lesions. PR: Improvement of degree of dysplasia or hyperplasia in all biopsied lesion(s) from advanced to early, or from early to normal epithelium in some lesions while other biopsied lesions remain stable. (NCT00951379)
Timeframe: Response assessed at Week 24 ±1 Week

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ResponseNo Response
Arm I (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride)1214
Arm II (Placebo)817

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Level of C-reactive Protein in Plasma Decrease From >5.0 mg/L to <= 5.0 mg/L From Baseline to End of Study

The longitudinal regression models for analysis of the change in CRP in plasma will be used, with suitable transformation if necessary to satisfy the model assumptions, with treatment, stage and biomarker value at screening visit as covariates. (NCT00951379)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study, 24 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
YesNo
Arm I (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride)315
Arm II (Placebo)021

[back to top]

Biomarker Measurements at Scheduled Visits: Tissue Levels of PPARG Nucleus and PPARG Cytoplasm

Tissue levels of Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARG) Nucleus and PPARG Cytoplasm as indirect measures of pharmacological effect, PPAR gamma assessed by immunohistochemistry. Tissue levels of biomarkers assessed from the biopsy obtained at the Screening Clinic Visit and Week 24 ± 1 Week, and plasma levels of biomarkers assessed from blood collected at the Baseline Clinic Visit and Week 24 ± 1 Week. Data reported as percentage of cells staining positive, according to nuclear or cytoplasmic compartments. (NCT00951379)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study, 24 weeks

,,,
Interventionpercentage of staining cells positive (Mean)
PPARG NucleusPPARG Cytoplasm
Pioglitazone: Baseline10.821.7
Pioglitazone: End of Study7.323.5
Placebo: Baseline12.420.2
Placebo: End of Study6.821.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With >5.0 mg/L in Level of C-reactive Protein in Plasma

"Degree of change of C-reactive protein (CRP) in plasma serum via blood tests.~The longitudinal regression models for analysis of the change in CRP in plasma used, with suitable transformation if necessary to satisfy the model assumptions, with treatment, stage and biomarker value at screening visit as covariates." (NCT00951379)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study, 24 weeks

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
YesNo
Pioglitazone: CRP>5 at Baseline618
Pioglitazone: CRP>5 End of Study119
Placebo: CRP> 5 Baseline421
Placebo: CRP>5 End of Study417

[back to top]

Number of Participants Affected by Adverse Events Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (v4.0)

All adverse events (including serious) and clinical laboratory toxicity summarized affected organ system. Reporting based on the NCI CTCAE v4.0 by treatment, details included in later Adverse Event Module of results. (NCT00951379)
Timeframe: Up to 26 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Blood & Lymphatic System DisordersCardiac DisordersEar & Labyrinth DisordersEye DisordersGastrointestinal DisordersGeneral Disorders & Administration Site ConditionsInfections and InfestationsInjury, Poisoning and Procedural ComplicationsInvestigationsMetabolism and Nutrition DisordersMusculoskeletal and Connective Tissue DisordersNeoplasms Benign, Malignant and UnspecifiedNervous System DisordersPsychiatric DisordersReproductive System and Breast DisordersRespiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal DisordersSkin and Subcutaneous Tissue DisordersSurgical and Medical ProceduresVascular Disorders
Arm I (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride)13072312903271143118425
Arm II (Placebo)0222221082208071092312

[back to top]

Number of Participant With Clinical Response by Baseline Characteristics: Tobacco Use

Tobacco use summarized by treatment stratified by stage and by group. In addition, the effects of tobacco and alcohol use on the primary endpoint of clinical response assessed. (NCT00951379)
Timeframe: Up to 26 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Never SmokedFormer SmokerCurrent Smoker
Arm I (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride)452
Arm II (Placebo)521

[back to top]

Number of Participant With Clinical Response by Baseline Characteristics: Alcohol Use

Alcohol use will be summarized by treatment stratified by stage and by group. In addition, the effects of tobacco and alcohol use on the primary endpoint of clinical and pathological response assessed using statistical regression models in an exploratory fashion. Heavy drinkers are participants who drank every day; Light drinkers are participants who drank on some days; Non-drinkers are former drinkers or those who never drank alcohol. (NCT00951379)
Timeframe: Up to 26 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Non-DrinkerLight DrinkerHeavy Drinker
Arm I (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride)281
Arm II (Placebo)260

[back to top]

Baseline - Juniper Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Score

Juniper Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score at the end of the pioglitazone treatment period as compared to the placebo treatment period. The AQLQ is scored on a 7-point scale with 7 = not impaired at all, 1 = severly impaired (NCT00994175)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pioglitazone4.478
Placebo4.306

[back to top]

16 Weeks - Juniper Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Score

Juniper Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score at the end of the pioglitazone treatment period as compared to the placebo treatment period. The AQLQ is scored on a 7-point scale with 7 = not impaired at all, 1 = severly impaired (NCT00994175)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pioglitazone4.7
Placebo4.6

[back to top]

Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) is a method for assessing insulin resistance (IR) from basal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting plasma insulin (FPI). It is calculated as (FPG x FPI)/405. (NCT00994682)
Timeframe: 18 and 36 months

,
InterventionArbitrary units (Mean)
HOMA-IR month 18HOMA-IR month 36
Pioglitazone1.41.6
Placebo4.32.3

[back to top]

Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity

Suppression of endogenous glucose production (Supp EGP) by low dose insulin (i.e., percentage of reduction of EGP with low dose insulin infusion compared to the baseline state). This was calculated as: 100*((EGP without insulin - EGP with insulin infusion)/EGP without insulin). All measurements are obtained at the same time point during an euglycemic insulin clamp. (NCT00994682)
Timeframe: 18 months

Intervention% of suppression of EGP (Mean)
Placebo37.7
Pioglitazone55.3

[back to top]

Body Mass Index (BMI)

(NCT00994682)
Timeframe: Months 18 and 36

,
Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
BMI Month 18BMI Month 36
Pioglitazone34.635.2
Placebo34.636.7

[back to top]

Total Body Fat

Total body fat measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (NCT00994682)
Timeframe: Months 18

InterventionPercentage of body weight that is fat (Mean)
Placebo36
Pioglitazone36

[back to top]

Skeletal Muscle Insulin Sensitivity

Rate of glucose disappearance (Rd) during high-dose insulin infusion. The rate of plasma glucose disappearance was calculated using Steele's non-steady-state equation. (NCT00994682)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionmg/kgLBM/min (Mean)
Placebo5.4
Pioglitazone9.6

[back to top]

Adipose Tissue Insulin Sensitivity

Suppression of free fatty acids by low dose insulin (i.e., percentage of reduction of plasma FFA with low dose insulin infusion compared to the baseline state). This was calculated as: 100*((plasma FFA without insulin - plasma FFA with insulin infusion)/plasma FFA without insulin). All measurements are obtained at the same time point during an euglycemic insulin clamp. (NCT00994682)
Timeframe: 18 months

Intervention% of suppression of FFA (Mean)
Placebo46.1
Pioglitazone65.9

[back to top]

Liver Fat by Magnetic Resonance and Spectroscopy (MRS).

Liver fat content was calculated as the fat fraction: 100*(area under the curve [AUC] of fat peak / [AUC of fat peak + AUC of water peak]). (NCT00994682)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of fat in liver (Mean)
Placebo11
Pioglitazone7

[back to top]

Mean Individual Histological Scores

Steatosis: 0 = <5%; 1 = 5-33%; 2 = >33-66%; 3 = >66%. Lobular Inflammation: 0 = No foci 1 = <2 foci/200x; 2 = 2-4 foci/200x, 3 = >4 foci/200x. Hepatocyte Ballooning: 0 = None; 1 = Few balloon cells; 2 = Many cells/prominent ballooning. Fibrosis: 0 = None; 1 = Perisinusoidal or periportal; 2 = Perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3 = Bridging fibrosis, 4 = Cirrhosis (NCT00994682)
Timeframe: Month 36

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SteatosisInflammationBallooningFibrosis
Pioglitazone0.970.810.220.66
Placebo1.561.300.330.89

[back to top]

Mean Individual Histological Scores

Mean change in individual scores compared to baseline. Steatosis: 0 = <5%; 1 = 5-33%; 2 = >33-66%; 3 = >66%. Lobular Inflammation: 0 = No foci 1 = <2 foci/200x; 2 = 2-4 foci/200x, 3 = >4 foci/200x. Hepatocyte Ballooning: 0 = None; 1 = Few balloon cells; 2 = Many cells/prominent ballooning. Fibrosis: 0 = None; 1 = Perisinusoidal or periportal; 2 = Perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3 = Bridging fibrosis, 4 = Cirrhosis (NCT00994682)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 18

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SteatosisInflammationBallooningFibrosis
Pioglitazone-1.1-0.6-0.6-0.5
Placebo-0.2-0.1-0.20

[back to top]

Plasma Biomarkers Relevant to Hepatic Inflammation, Apoptosis and Fibrosis (Adiponectin).

(NCT00994682)
Timeframe: 18 and 36 months

,
Interventionμg/ml (Mean)
Adiponectin month 18Adiponectin month 36
Pioglitazone22.824.2
Placebo9.124.0

[back to top]

Plasma Biomarkers Relevant to Hepatic Inflammation, Apoptosis and Fibrosis (CK-18).

(NCT00994682)
Timeframe: 18 and 36 months

,
InterventionU/L (Mean)
CK-18 month 18CK-18 month 36
Pioglitazone186151
Placebo314245

[back to top]

Prevention of the Onset of T2DM and/or Reversal From IFG/IGT to NGT in Non-diabetics.

Number of patients developing T2DM and number of patients regressing to NGT among patients with prediabetes (IFG/IGT). (NCT00994682)
Timeframe: 18 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Patients developing T2DMPatients regressing to NGT
Pioglitazone110
Placebo21

[back to top]

Liver Transaminases (AST and ALT).

(NCT00994682)
Timeframe: 18 and 36 months

,
InterventionU/L (Mean)
ALT at month 18AST at month 18ALT at month 36AST at month 36
Pioglitazone27292727
Placebo44383230

[back to top]

Individual Histological Scores

"Number of patients with improvement of at least 1 grade in each of the histological parameters.~Steatosis: 0 = <5%; 1 = 5-33%; 2 = >33-66%; 3 = >66%. Lobular Inflammation: 0 = No foci 1 = <2 foci/200x; 2 = 2-4 foci/200x, 3 = >4 foci/200x. Hepatocyte Ballooning: 0 = None; 1 = Few balloon cells; 2 = Many cells/prominent ballooning. Fibrosis: 0 = None; 1 = Perisinusoidal or periportal, 1A = Mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal delicate fibrosis; 1B = Moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal dense fibrosis; 1C = Portal/periportal; 2 = Perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3 = Bridging fibrosis, 4 = Cirrhosis" (NCT00994682)
Timeframe: Month 18

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SteatosisInflammationBallooningFibrosis
Pioglitazone35252520
Placebo13111213

[back to top]

Osteoporotic Fractures

Number of patients with osteoporotic fractures (NCT00994682)
Timeframe: 18 and 36 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pioglitazone0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Resolution of NASH

Resolution of NASH was defined as absence of NASH after 18 months of therapy in patients with definite NASH (presence of zone 3 accentuation of macrovesicular steatosis of any grade, hepatocellular ballooning of any degree, and lobular inflammatory infiltrates of any amount) at baseline. (NCT00994682)
Timeframe: Month 18

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo10
Pioglitazone26

[back to top]

Liver Histology (Using Kleiner et al Criteria, Hepatology 2005)

"Number of patients with reduction of at least 2 points in the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) (with reduction in at least 2 different histological categories) without worsening of fibrosis. NAS is the sum of the separate scores for steatosis (0-3), hepatocellular ballooning (0-2) and lobular inflammation (0-3), and ranges from 0-8 .~The scoring system is based on the following grading:~Steatosis: 0 = <5%; 1 = 5-33%; 2 = >33-66%; 3 = >66%. Lobular Inflammation: 0 = No foci 1 = <2 foci/200x; 2 = 2-4 foci/200x, 3 = >4 foci/200x. Hepatocyte Ballooning: 0 = None; 1 = Few balloon cells; 2 = Many cells/prominent ballooning. Fibrosis: 0 = None; 1 = Perisinusoidal or periportal; 2 = Perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3 = Bridging fibrosis, 4 = Cirrhosis." (NCT00994682)
Timeframe: At 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo9
Pioglitazone29

[back to top]

Bone Mineral Density

Bone mineral density measured at the levels of spine, femoral neck, hip, and wrist by DXA. (NCT00994682)
Timeframe: 18 and 36 months

,
Interventiong/cm^2 (Mean)
Spine BMD at month 18Femoral Neck BMD at month 18Hip BMD at month 18Wrist BMD at month 18Spine BMD at month 36Femoral Neck BMD at month 36Hip BMD at month 36Wrist BMD at month 36
Pioglitazone1.040.841.050.761.060.841.020.75
Placebo1.100.861.050.781.100.841.060.77

[back to top]

HDL-cholesterol

Change from baseline in plasma HDL-cholesterol after 18 months of therapy (NCT01002547)
Timeframe: Month 18

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Placebo-1
Vitamin E1
Pioglitazone + Vitamin E3

[back to top]

Fasting Plasma Insulin

Change from baseline after 18 months of therapy (NCT01002547)
Timeframe: Month 18

InterventionuU/ml (Mean)
Placebo3
Vitamin E-3
Pioglitazone + Vitamin E-3

[back to top]

Fasting Plasma Glucose

Change from baseline after 18 months of therapy (NCT01002547)
Timeframe: Month 18

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Placebo6
Vitamin E-3
Pioglitazone + Vitamin E-16

[back to top]

Body Mass Index

Weight (in kg) / (Height [in m] x Height [in m]) (NCT01002547)
Timeframe: Month 18

Interventionkg/m2 (Mean)
Placebo-0.6
Vitamin E0.1
Pioglitazone + Vitamin E1.4

[back to top]

Mean Individual Histological Scores

"Mean change in individual scores compared to baseline. Steatosis range 0-3, where: 0 = <5% fat; 1 = 5-33% fat; 2 = >33-66% fat; 3 = >66% fat.~Lobular Inflammation, range 0-3, where: 0 = No foci 1 = <2 foci/200x; 2 = 2-4 foci/200x, 3 = >4 foci/200x.~Hepatocyte Ballooning, range 0-2, where: 0 = None; 1 = Few balloon cells; 2 = Many cells/prominent ballooning.~Fibrosis stage, range 0-4, where: 0 = None; 1 = Perisinusoidal or periportal; 2 = Perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3 = Bridging fibrosis, 4 = Cirrhosis." (NCT01002547)
Timeframe: Month 18

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SteatosisInflammationBallooningFibrosis
Pioglitazone + Vitamin E-1.3-0.6-0.6-0.6
Placebo-0.4-0.2-0.1-0.3
Vitamin E-1.0-0.4-0.5-0.6

[back to top]

Individual Histological Scores

"Number of patients with improvement of at least 1 grade in each of the histological parameters.~Steatosis: 0 = <5%; 1 = 5-33%; 2 = >33-66%; 3 = >66%. Lobular Inflammation: 0 = No foci 1 = <2 foci/200x; 2 = 2-4 foci/200x, 3 = >4 foci/200x.~Hepatocyte Ballooning: 0 = None; 1 = Few balloon cells; 2 = Many cells/prominent ballooning.~Fibrosis: 0 = None; 1 = Perisinusoidal or periportal; 2 = Perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3 = Bridging fibrosis, 4 = Cirrhosis." (NCT01002547)
Timeframe: Month 18

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SteatosisInflammationBallooningFibrosis
Pioglitazone + Vitamin E32252319
Placebo15141110
Vitamin E24131819

[back to top]

Weight

Change from baseline in weight (NCT01002547)
Timeframe: Month 18

Interventionkg (Mean)
Placebo-0.8
Vitamin E0.5
Pioglitazone + Vitamin E5.7

[back to top]

Triglycerides

Change from baseline in plasma triglycerides after 18 months of therapy (NCT01002547)
Timeframe: Month 18

Interventionmg/dl (Median)
Placebo13
Vitamin E14
Pioglitazone + Vitamin E-2

[back to top]

Total Cholesterol

Change from baseline in plasma total cholesterol after 18 months of therapy (NCT01002547)
Timeframe: Month 18

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Placebo-11
Vitamin E5
Pioglitazone + Vitamin E1

[back to top]

Total Body Fat by DEXA

Change from baseline in total body fat by DEX after 18 months of therapy (NCT01002547)
Timeframe: Month 18

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Placebo0
Vitamin E0
Pioglitazone + Vitamin E2

[back to top]

Plasma AST

Change from baseline in plasma AST after 18 months of therapy (NCT01002547)
Timeframe: Month 18

InterventionU/L (Mean)
Placebo-8
Vitamin E-15
Pioglitazone + Vitamin E-10

[back to top]

Plasma ALT

Change from baseline in plasma ALT after 18 months of therapy (NCT01002547)
Timeframe: Month 18

InterventionU/L (Mean)
Placebo-6
Vitamin E-24
Pioglitazone + Vitamin E-18

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Resolution of NASH Without Worsening of Fibrosis

Resolution of NASH was defined as absence of NASH after 18 months of therapy in patients with definite NASH (presence of zone 3 accentuation of macrovesicular steatosis of any grade, hepatocellular ballooning of any degree, and lobular inflammatory infiltrates of any amount) at baseline. (NCT01002547)
Timeframe: Month 18

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo5
Vitamin E14
Pioglitazone + Vitamin E20

[back to top]

Matsuda Index

This is a method for assessing insulin resistance (IR) based on measurements of glucose and insulin during the oral glucose tolerance test. The formula used is = (10000/(SQRT(fasting plasma glucose * fasting plasma insulin * ((fasting plasma glucose * 15 + glucose at minute 30 * 30 + glucose at minute 60 * 30 + glucose at minute 90 * 30 + glucose at minute 120 * 15)/120)*((fasting plasma insulin * 15 + insulin at minute 30 * 30 + insulin at minute 60 * 30 + insulin at minute 90 * 30 + insulin at minute 120 * 15)/120))), with a lower value representing worse insulin resistance. (NCT01002547)
Timeframe: Month 18

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo2.53
Vitamin E2.31
Pioglitazone + Vitamin E4.02

[back to top]

Liver Histology (Kleiner's et al Criteria, Hepatology 2005)

"Number of patients with reduction of at least 2 points in the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) (with reduction in at least 2 different histological categories) without worsening of fibrosis. NAS is the sum of the separate scores for steatosis (0-3), hepatocellular ballooning (0-2) and lobular inflammation (0-3), and ranges from 0-8 .~The scoring system is based on the following grading:~Steatosis: 0 = <5%; 1 = 5-33%; 2 = >33-66%; 3 = >66%. Lobular Inflammation: 0 = No foci 1 = <2 foci/200x; 2 = 2-4 foci/200x, 3 = >4 foci/200x. Hepatocyte Ballooning: 0 = None; 1 = Few balloon cells; 2 = Many cells/prominent ballooning. Fibrosis: 0 = None; 1 = Perisinusoidal or periportal; 2 = Perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3 = Bridging fibrosis, 4 = Cirrhosis." (NCT01002547)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo7
Vitamin E13
Pioglitazone + Vitamin E24

[back to top]

Liver Fat by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy (MRS).

Change from baseline in intrahepatic triglyceride content after 18 months of therapy (NCT01002547)
Timeframe: Month 18

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Placebo1
Vitamin E-6
Pioglitazone + Vitamin E-10

[back to top]

LDL-cholesterol

Change from baseline in plasma LDL-cholesterol after 18 months of therapy (NCT01002547)
Timeframe: Month 18

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Placebo-12
Vitamin E0
Pioglitazone + Vitamin E-4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose at Week 12

The change from Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose as a covariate. (NCT01026194)
Timeframe: at Week 0 and Week 12

Interventionmg / dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Teneli + Pio-5.6
Teneli/Teneli + Pio-56.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 12

The change from Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline Fasting Plasma Glucose as a covariate. (NCT01026194)
Timeframe: at Week 0 and Week 12

Interventionmg / dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Teneli + Pio-4.5
Teneli/Teneli + Pio-21.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 12

The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT01026194)
Timeframe: at Week 0 and Week 12

InterventionPercent of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Teneli + Pio-0.20
Teneli/Teneli + Pio-0.94

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Areas Under the Curve From 0 to 2 h (AUC0-2h) for Postprandial Plasma Glucose at Week 12

The change from Baseline in AUC0-2h for Postprandial Plasma Glucose collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline AUC0-2h for Postprandial Plasma Glucose as a covariate. (NCT01026194)
Timeframe: 0, 0.5, 1, 2 hours post-dose at Week 0 and Week 12

Interventionmg*h / dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Teneli + Pio-13.722
Teneli/Teneli + Pio-85.031

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (i.e., Week 0 of the 24-week Base Study) in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 54

Change from baseline at Week 54 is defined as Week 54 minus Week 0. (NCT01028391)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 54

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg q.d. + Pioglitazone 45 mg q.d.-61.3
Pioglitazone 45 mg q.d.-52.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (i.e., Week 0 of the 24-week Base Study) in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 54

HbA1c is measured as percent. Thus this change from baseline reflects the Week 54 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. (NCT01028391)
Timeframe: Baseline and 54 Weeks

InterventionPercent HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg q.d. + Pioglitazone 45 mg q.d.-2.37
Pioglitazone 45 mg q.d.-1.86

[back to top]

Plasma 15-epi-lipoxin A4

Plasma 15-epi-LXA4 levels (NCT01040819)
Timeframe: 2 months

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg1.05
Pioglitazone 30 mg/d1.08

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Electrocardiogram Parameters, Fridericia Corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and PR Interval

The QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave and was calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) data using Fridericia's formula: QTc = QT/RR^0.33. Corrected QT (QTc) is the QT interval corrected for heart rate and RR, which is the interval between two R waves. PR is the interval between the P wave and the QRS complex. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

,,
Interventionmilliseconds (msec) (Least Squares Mean)
QTcF Interval (n=239, 243, 226)PR Interval (n=237, 243, 220)
0.75 mg LY21892652.300.69
1.5 mg LY21892651.282.57
Exenatide2.52-0.82

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Blood Pressure

Seated systolic blood pressure (SBP) and seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

,,
Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Seated SBP (n=248, 256, 238)Seated DBP (n=248, 256, 238)
0.75 mg LY21892651.620.76
1.5 mg LY21892650.830.89
Exenatide0.020.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Electrocardiogram Parameters, Fridericia Corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and PR Interval

The QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave and was calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) data using Fridericia's formula: QTc = QT/RR^0.33. Corrected QT (QTc) is the QT interval corrected for heart rate and RR, which is the interval between two R waves. PR is the interval between the P wave and the QRS complex. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

,,,
Interventionmilliseconds (msec) (Least Squares Mean)
QTcF Interval (n=253, 260, 250, 120)PR Interval (n=252, 259, 246, 116)
0.75 mg LY21892650.910.93
1.5 mg LY2189265-1.112.35
Exenatide1.211.01
Placebo1.32-1.83

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in the EuroQol 5

The European Quality of Life - 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument. It consists of 2 parts: the first part assesses 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that have 3 possible levels of response (no problem, some problem, or extreme problem). These dimensions are converted into a weighted health-state Index Score. The EQ-5D United Kingdom (UK) score ranges from -0.59 to 1.0, where a score of 1.0 indicates perfect health and negative values are valued as worse than dead. The second part of the questionnaire consists of a visual analog scale (VAS) on which the participants rated their perceived health state on that day from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health). Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted by treatment, country, and baseline. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
VAS Health State Score (n=270, 267, 264, 119)EQ-5D UK (n=270, 266, 264, 119)
0.75 mg LY21892652.410.01
1.5 mg LY21892654.500.01
Exenatide3.940.00
Placebo0.71-0.00

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) for LY2189265

Evaluable pharmacokinetic concentrations from the 4-week, 13-week, 26-week, and 52-week timepoints were combined and utilized in a population approach to determine the population mean estimate and standard deviation at steady-state. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: 4 weeks, 13 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks

Interventionnanogram hours per milliliter (ng*hr/mL) (Mean)
1.5 mg LY218926512383
0.75 mg LY21892656627

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events at 52 Weeks

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that first occurs or worsens (increases in severity) after baseline regardless of causality or severity. The number of participants with one or more TEAE is summarized cumulatively at 52 weeks, with the exception of the Placebo/1.5 mg LY2189265 and Placebo/0.75 mg LY2189265 treatment groups, which include only TEAEs that occurred during treatment with LY2189265 (26 weeks through 52 weeks). A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 52 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1.5 mg LY2189265226
0.75 mg LY2189265220
Exenatide221
Placebo/1.5 mg LY218926547
Placebo/0.75 mg LY218926541

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events at 26 Weeks

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that first occurs or worsens (increases in severity) after baseline regardless of causality or severity. The number of participants with one or more TEAE is summarized cumulatively at 26 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1.5 mg LY2189265215
0.75 mg LY2189265199
Exenatide198
Placebo104

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Attaining Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than 7% and Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at 52 Weeks

The percentage of participants achieving HbA1c level less than 7.0% and less than or equal to 6.5% was analyzed with a logistic regression model with baseline, country, and treatment as factors included in the model. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HbA1c Less Than 7.0%HbA1c Less Than or Equal to 6.5%
0.75 mg LY218926559.148.3
1.5 mg LY218926570.857.2
Exenatide49.234.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With LY2189265 Antibodies at 26 Weeks

LY2189265 (Dulaglutide) anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were assessed. The number of participants with initial postbaseline detection of treatment emergent (defined as a 4-fold increase in the ADA titer from baseline) LY2189265 ADA were summarized. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
0.75 mg LY2189265 or 1.5 mg LY21892656
Exenatide12
Placebo2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 52 Weeks

The number of participants with pancreatitis confirmed by adjudication is summarized cumulatively at 52 weeks, with the exception of the Placebo/1.5 mg LY2189265 and Placebo/0.75 mg LY2189265 treatment groups, which include only participants with confirmed pancreatitis during treatment with LY2189265 (26 weeks through 52 weeks). A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 52 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1.5 mg LY21892651
0.75 mg LY21892650
Exenatide0
Placebo/1.5 mg LY21892650
Placebo/0.75 mg LY21892650

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 26 Weeks

The number of participants with pancreatitis confirmed by adjudication is summarized cumulatively at 26 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1.5 mg LY21892650
0.75 mg LY21892650
Exenatide0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy Due to Hyperglycemia at 52 Weeks

"Rescue therapy was defined as any additional therapeutic intervention in participants who developed persistent, severe hyperglycemia despite full compliance with the assigned therapeutic regimen, or initiation of an alternative antihyperglycemic medication following study drug discontinuation. Participants who had no rescue therapy within specified study period were considered as censored observations at the last available contact date up to specified study period. Time to start first new glucose-lowering intervention due to hyperglycemia (rescue therapy) was analyzed between the groups using the semi-parametric proportional hazard regression model with treatment group and country as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a covariate." (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 52 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1.5 mg LY218926510
0.75 mg LY218926527
Exenatide31

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA2-%B) and Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA2-%S)

The homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) quantifies insulin resistance and beta-cell function. HOMA2-B is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate steady-state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population (normal young adults). HOMA2-S is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate insulin sensitivity (%S) as percentages of a normal reference population (normal young adults). The normal reference populations were set at 100%. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

,,
Interventionpercentage of HOMA2 (Least Squares Mean)
HOMA2-%BHOMA2-%S
0.75 mg LY218926525.69-5.49
1.5 mg LY218926535.21-7.48
Exenatide13.57-3.75

[back to top]

Number of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy Due to Hyperglycemia at 26 Weeks

"Rescue therapy was defined as any additional therapeutic intervention in participants who developed persistent, severe hyperglycemia despite full compliance with the assigned therapeutic regimen, or initiation of an alternative antihyperglycemic medication following study drug discontinuation. Participants who had no rescue therapy within specified study period were considered as censored observations at the last available contact date up to specified study period. Time to start first new glucose-lowering intervention due to hyperglycemia (rescue therapy) was analyzed between the groups using the semi-parametric proportional hazard regression model with treatment group and country as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a covariate." (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1.5 mg LY21892654
0.75 mg LY218926514
Exenatide13
Placebo22

[back to top]

Change in Baseline to 52 Weeks on Pulse Rate

Seated pulse rate was measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892651.68
0.75 mg LY21892651.56
Exenatide1.15

[back to top]

Change in Baseline to 26 Weeks on Pulse Rate

Seated pulse rate was measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892652.80
0.75 mg LY21892652.80
Exenatide1.18
Placebo0.61

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on the Impact of Weight on Self-Perception

The Impact of Weight on Self-Perception (IW-SP) questionnaire contains 3 items that assess how often the participants' body weight affects how happy they are with their appearance and how often they feel self-conscious when out in public. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = never and 1 = always. A single total score is calculated by summing the scores for all 3 items. Total score ranges between 3 and 15, where a higher score is indicative of better self-perception. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892650.50
0.75 mg LY21892650.47
Exenatide0.64

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Serum Calcitonin

(NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionpicograms per milliliter (pg/mL) (Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892650.21
0.75 mg LY21892650.05
Exenatide0.10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Body Mass Index (BMI)

Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionkilograms per meter squared (kg/m^2) (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265-0.37
0.75 mg LY21892650.18
Exenatide-0.28

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in the Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living

"The Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living (renamed the Ability to Perform Physical Activities of Daily Living [APPADL]) questionnaire contains 7 items that assess how difficult it is for participants to engage in certain activities considered to be integral to normal daily life, such as walking, standing and climbing stairs. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = not at all difficult and 1 = unable to do. The individual scores from all 7 items are summed and a single total score is calculated and may range between 7 and 35. A higher score indicates better ability to perform activities of daily living. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate." (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892650.18
0.75 mg LY2189265-0.18
Exenatide0.35

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in Hematological and Biochemical Lab Values

(NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Intervention (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265NA
0.75 mg LY2189265NA
ExenatideNA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks for Daily Mean Blood Glucose Values From the 8-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profiles

The SMPG data were collected at the following 8 time points: pre-morning meal; 2 hours post-morning meal; pre-midday meal; 2 hours post-midday meal; pre-evening; 2 hours post-evening meal; bedtime; and 3AM or 5 hours after bedtime. Least squares (LS) means of the mean of the 8 time points (daily mean) were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionmilligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265-43.84
0.75 mg LY2189265-40.62
Exenatide-36.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks for Body Weight

Least squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionkilograms (kg) (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265-1.08
0.75 mg LY21892650.49
Exenatide-0.76

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks Endpoint in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Least squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265-1.36
0.75 mg LY2189265-1.07
Exenatide-0.80

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on the Impact of Weight on Self-Perception

The Impact of Weight on Self-Perception (IW-SP) questionnaire contains 3 items that assess how often the participants' body weight affects how happy they are with their appearance and how often they feel self-conscious when out in public. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = never and 1 = always. A single total score is calculated by summing the scores for all 3 items. Total score ranges between 3 and 15, where a higher score is indicative of better self-perception. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892650.56
0.75 mg LY21892650.47
Exenatide0.46
Placebo0.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Serum Calcitonin

(NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionpicograms per milliliter (pg/mL) (Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892650.20
0.75 mg LY21892650.22
Exenatide0.05
Placebo0.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Body Mass Index (BMI)

Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionkilograms per meter squared (kg/m^2) (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265-0.48
0.75 mg LY21892650.07
Exenatide-0.41
Placebo0.49

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in the Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living

"The Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living (renamed the Ability to Perform Physical Activities of Daily Living [APPADL]) questionnaire contains 7 items that assess how difficult it is for participants to engage in certain activities considered to be integral to normal daily life, such as walking, standing and climbing stairs. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = not at all difficult and 1 = unable to do. The individual scores from all 7 items are summed and a single total score is calculated and may range between 7 and 35. A higher score indicates better ability to perform activities of daily living. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate." (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892650.18
0.75 mg LY21892650.12
Exenatide0.47
Placebo0.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs) Version

The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version (DTSQs) is used to assess participant treatment satisfaction at each study visit. The questionnaire consists of 8 items, 6 of which (1, and 4 through 8) assess treatment satisfaction. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale. Scores from the 6 treatment satisfaction items are summed to a Total Treatment Satisfaction Score, which ranges from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 36 (very satisfied). The DTSQ change version (DTSQc) was not collected at 26 weeks. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline score as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892652.40
0.75 mg LY21892652.56
Exenatide0.85
Placebo0.49

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in the EuroQol 5

The European Quality of Life - 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument. It consists of 2 parts: the first part assesses 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that have 3 possible levels of response (no problem, some problem, or extreme problem). These dimensions are converted into a weighted health-state Index Score. The EQ-5D United Kingdom (UK) score ranges from -0.59 to 1.0, where a score of 1.0 indicates perfect health and negative values are valued as worse than dead. The second part of the questionnaire consists of a visual analog scale (VAS) on which the participants rated their perceived health state on that day from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health). Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted by treatment, country, and baseline. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
VAS Health State Score (n=270, 267, 264)EQ-5D UK (n=270, 266, 264)
0.75 mg LY21892653.520.01
1.5 mg LY21892655.150.02
Exenatide3.51-0.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs) and Change (DTSQc) Versions

The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status (DTSQs) and change (DTSQc) versions are used to assess participant treatment satisfaction at each study visit and relative change in satisfaction from baseline, respectively. Both questionnaires consist of 8 items, 6 of which (1, and 4 through 8) assess treatment satisfaction. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale. The change version has the same 8 items as the status version with a small alteration of the wording of Item 7. Scores from the 6 treatment satisfaction items are summed to a Total Treatment Satisfaction Score, which ranges from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 36 (very satisfied) for the DTSQs and from -18 (much less satisfied) to +18 (much more satisfied) for the DTSQc. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline score as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
DTSQs Treatment Satisfaction (n=270, 268, 266)DTSQc Treatment Satisfaction (n=249, 237, 226)
0.75 mg LY21892652.1115.46
1.5 mg LY21892652.0515.36
Exenatide0.6914.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in N Terminal Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)

(NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionpicograms per milliliter (pg/mL) (Median)
1.5 mg LY2189265-6.77
0.75 mg LY2189265-2.96
Exenatide-3.38
Placebo-0.85

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in Hematological and Biochemical Lab Values

(NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Intervention (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265NA
0.75 mg LY2189265NA
ExenatideNA
PlaceboNA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks for Daily Mean Blood Glucose Values From the 8-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profiles

The SMPG data were collected at the following 8 time points: pre-morning meal; 2 hours post-morning meal; pre-midday meal; 2 hours post-midday meal; pre-evening; 2 hours post-evening meal; bedtime; and 3AM or 5 hours after bedtime. Least squares (LS) means of the mean of the 8 time points (daily mean) were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionmilligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265-46.82
0.75 mg LY2189265-42.09
Exenatide-37.48
Placebo-18.07

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks for Body Weight

Least squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionkilograms (kg) (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265-1.34
0.75 mg LY21892650.18
Exenatide-1.14
Placebo1.37

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks Endpoint in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Least squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265-1.51
0.75 mg LY2189265-1.30
Exenatide-0.99
Placebo-0.46

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA2-%B) and Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA2-%S)

The homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) quantifies insulin resistance and beta-cell function. HOMA2-B is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate steady-state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population (normal young adults). HOMA2-S is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate insulin sensitivity (%S) as percentages of a normal reference population (normal young adults). The normal reference populations were set at 100%. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

,,,
Interventionpercentage of HOMA2 (Least Squares Mean)
HOMA2-%BHOMA2-%S
0.75 mg LY218926523.611.16
1.5 mg LY218926536.14-3.14
Exenatide15.02-1.59
Placebo0.932.56

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Attaining Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than 7% and Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at 26 Weeks

The percentage of participants achieving HbA1c level less than 7.0% and less than or equal to 6.5% was analyzed with a logistic regression model with baseline, country, and treatment as factors included in the model. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HbA1c Less Than 7%HbA1c Less Than or Equal to 6.5%
0.75 mg LY218926565.853.2
1.5 mg LY218926578.262.7
Exenatide52.338.0
Placebo42.924.4

[back to top]

Number of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 52 Weeks

Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of less than or equal to 3.9 millimoles/liter [mmol/L]), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of less than or equal to 3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The number of self-reported hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 52 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 52 weeks

,,
Interventionevents (Number)
Severe HEDocumented Symptomatic HEAsymptomatic HENocturnal HEProbable Symptomatic HE
0.75 mg LY21892650391572922
1.5 mg LY218926505347208
Exenatide220598574

[back to top]

Number of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 26 Weeks

Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of less than or equal to 3.9 millimoles/liter [mmol/L]), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of less than or equal to 3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The number of self-reported hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 26 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26 weeks

,,,
Interventionevents (Number)
Severe HEDocumented Symptomatic HEAsymptomatic HENocturnal HEProbable Symptomatic HE
0.75 mg LY2189265025951516
1.5 mg LY21892650312695
Exenatide114651313
Placebo04563

[back to top]

Number of Participants With LY2189265 Antibodies at 52 Weeks and 4 Weeks After Last Dose of Study Drug

LY2189265 (Dulaglutide) anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were assessed. The number of participants with initial postbaseline detection of treatment emergent (defined as a 4-fold increase in the ADA titer from baseline) LY2189265 ADA were summarized. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: 26 weeks through 52 weeks and 53 weeks through 4 weeks after last dose

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
52 weeks4 weeks after last study dose
0.75 mg LY2189265 or 1.5 mg LY218926531
Exenatide20
Placebo/0.75 mg LY2189265 or 1.5 mg LY218926521

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular Events at 52 Weeks

Information on cardiovascular (CV) risk factors was collected at baseline. Data on any new CV event was prospectively collected using a CV event electronic case report form. At prespecified visits, participants were asked about any new CV event since the previous inquiry. Deaths and nonfatal cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) were adjudicated by an external committee of physicians with cardiology expertise. Nonfatal cardiovascular AEs to be adjudicated included myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, coronary interventions, and cerebrovascular events, including cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and transient ischemic attack. The number of participants with CV events confirmed by adjudication is summarized cumulatively at 52 weeks. Serious and all other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality are summarized in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 52 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any CV EventAny Fatal EventAny Non-fatal CV Event
0.75 mg LY2189265202
1.5 mg LY2189265313
Exenatide202

[back to top]

Rate of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 26 Weeks

Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of equal to or less than 3.9 millimoles/liter [mmol/L]), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of equal to or less than 3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The 1-year adjusted rate of hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 26 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26 weeks

,,,
Interventionevents per participant per year (Mean)
Severe HEDocumented symptomatic HEAsymptomatic HENocturnal HEProbable symptomatic HE
0.75 mg LY21892650.000.180.690.190.24
1.5 mg LY21892650.000.220.190.060.04
Exenatide0.011.070.380.230.02
Placebo0.000.060.270.270.04

[back to top]

Rate of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 52 Weeks

Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of equal to or less than millimoles/liter [mmol/L]), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of equal to or less than 3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The 1-year adjusted rate of hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 52 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 52 weeks

,,
Interventionevents per participant per year (Mean)
Severe HEDocumented symptomatic HEAsymptomatic HENocturnal HEProbable symptomatic HE
0.75 mg LY21892650.000.140.560.190.21
1.5 mg LY21892650.000.190.170.070.03
Exenatide0.010.760.370.210.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Pancreatic Enzymes

Amylase (total and pancreas-derived) and lipase concentrations were measured. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

,,
Interventionunits per liter (Median)
Amylase, Total (n=255, 263, 261)Amylase, Pancreas-derived (n=236, 253, 246)Lipase (n=201, 205, 221)
0.75 mg LY21892652.787.690.00
1.5 mg LY21892659.2116.675.45
Exenatide2.387.853.57

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Pancreatic Enzymes

Amylase (total and pancreas-derived) and lipase concentrations were measured. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

,,,
Interventionunits per liter (Median)
Amylase, Total (n=253, 253, 254, 127)Amylase, Pancreas-derived (n=237, 247, 246, 122)Lipase (n=198, 203, 222, 114)
0.75 mg LY21892653.2810.340.00
1.5 mg LY218926512.5014.8110.34
Exenatide5.565.563.94
Placebo-3.33-3.77-9.53

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Blood Pressure

Seated systolic blood pressure (SBP) and seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

,,,
Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean)
Seated SBP (n=263, 266, 259, 127)Seated DBP (n=263, 266, 259, 127)
0.75 mg LY2189265-0.360.56
1.5 mg LY21892650.110.76
Exenatide0.06-0.11
Placebo3.401.25

[back to top]

Number of Participants With One or More Adverse Events (AEs) - Week 0 to Week 54

(NCT01076075)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 54

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sitagliptin120
Placebo/Pioglitazone122

[back to top]

Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Drug Due to An Adverse Event

(NCT01076075)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 54

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sitagliptin3
Placebo/Pioglitazone9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (%) at Week 24

Change from baseline reflects the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. A1C represents the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin. (NCT01076075)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionPercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.84
Placebo/Pioglitazone-0.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 24

Change from baseline reflects the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. (NCT01076075)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-13.2
Placebo/Pioglitazone5.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2-hour Post-Meal Glucose at Week 24

Change from baseline reflects the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. Two-hour post-meal glucose was measured following a standard meal. (NCT01076075)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-36.8
Placebo/Pioglitazone-3.3

[back to top]

Effects of Pioglitazone on 24h Blood Pressure Control

24 hour blood pressure measurements were performed after each treatment/diet phase (NCT01090752)
Timeframe: march 2009

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Pioglitazone Low Salt/High Salt128
Placebo Low Salt/High Salt129

[back to top]

Effects of Pioglitazone on Sodium and Lithium Clearances

At the end of each treatment and diet phase, 24 urine collections were collected for the determination of sodium and lithium clearances (NCT01090752)
Timeframe: 2007

Interventionml/min (Mean)
Pioglitazone Low Salt/High Salt1.05
Placebo Low Salt/High Salt1.18

[back to top]

Effects of Pioglitazone on Renal Hemodynamics

At the end of each treatment diet phase, renal clearances were performed for the determination of GFR and RBF (NCT01090752)
Timeframe: 2008

Interventionml/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Pioglitazone Low Salt/High Salt68.0
Placebo Low Salt/High Salt62.4

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Total Body Weight (kg) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

Secondary endpoints were tested using sequential testing procedure and are presented in hierarchical order. Adjusted mean change from baseline in total body weight at Week 24 (or the last postbaseline measurement prior to Week 24 if no Week 24 assessment was available was determined. Data after rescue medication was excluded from this analysis. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start date and time of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. In cases where time of the first dose or time of the assessment was not available, baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. Body weight measurements were obtained during the qualification and lead-in periods and on Day 1 and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 of the double-blind period. (NCT01095666)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionkg (Mean)
Placebo + Metformin-0.74
Dapagliflozin 5 mg + Metformin-1.84
Dapagliflozin 10 mg + Metformin-2.56

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

HbA1c was measured as percent of hemoglobin by a central laboratory. Data after rescue medication was excluded from this analysis. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start date and time of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. In cases where time of the first dose or time of the assessment was not available, baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. HbA1c measurements were obtained during the qualification and lead-in periods and on Day 1 and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in the double-blind period. (NCT01095666)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Intervention% of hemoglobin (Mean)
Placebo + Metformin-0.23
Dapagliflozin 5 mg + Metformin-0.82
Dapagliflozin 10 mg + Metformin-0.85

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

Secondary endpoints were tested using sequential testing procedure and are presented in hierarchical order. Fasting plasma glucose was measured as milligrams per deciliter(mg/dL) by a central laboratory. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start date and time of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. In cases where time of the first dose or time of the assessment was not available, baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. FPG measurements were obtained during the qualification and lead-in periods and on Day 1 and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 in the double-blind period. (NCT01095666)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Placebo + Metformin0.5
Dapagliflozin 5 mg + Metformin-21.6
Dapagliflozin 10 mg + Metformin-26.6

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in 2-hour Post Meal Glucose (PMG) (mg/dL) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

Secondary endpoints were tested using sequential testing procedure and are presented in hierarchical order. Post Meal Glucose was measured as milligrams per deciliter(mg/dL) by a central laboratory. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start date and time of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. In cases where time of the first dose or time of the assessment was not available, baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. PMG measurements were obtained on Day 1 and week 24 in the double-blind period. (NCT01095666)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Placebo + Metformin-15.5
Dapagliflozin 5 mg + Metformin-57.8
Dapagliflozin 10 mg + Metformin-64.6

[back to top]

Participants Achieving a Therapeutic Glycemic Response (Hemoglobin A1c [HbA1C]) <7.0% at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

Secondary endpoints were tested using sequential testing procedure and are presented in hierarchical order. Therapeutic glycemic response is defined as HbA1c <7.0%. Data after rescue medication was excluded from this analysis. HbA1c was measured as a percent of hemoglobin. Percentage of participants were estimated by modified logistic regression model, adjusted for baseline HbA1c. (NCT01095666)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo + Metformin17.5
Dapagliflozin 5 mg + Metformin32.9
Dapagliflozin 10 mg + Metformin33.0

[back to top]

Presence of Edema Post Baseline During 12 Weeks Active Treatment

Effects of 3 different doses of Mitoglitazone and pioglitazone as compared to placebo on presence of edema following once-daily dosing for 12 weeks (NCT01103414)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Mitoglitazone 50 mg Capsules8
Mitoglitazone 100 mg Capsules9
Mitoglitazone 150 mg Capsules4
Pioglitazone 45 mg Capsules6
Matching Placebo8

[back to top]

Changes in LDL Particle Size Subfractions From Baseline to Week 12

Effects of 3 different doses of Mitoglitazone and pioglitazone as compared to placebo on LDL particle size profile as characterized by changes in NMR analysis of subfractions following once-daily dosing for 12 weeks (NCT01103414)
Timeframe: 12 week

InterventionnM (Mean)
Mitoglitazone 50 mg Capsules0.20
Mitoglitazone 100 mg Capsules0.20
Mitoglitazone 150 mg Capsules0.30
Pioglitazone 45 mg Capsules0.60
Matching Placebo0.00

[back to top]

Changes in HDL Particle Size Subfractions From Baseline to Week 12

Effects of 3 different doses of Mitoglitazone and pioglitazone as compared to placebo on HDL particle size profile as characterized by changes in NMR analysis of subfractions following once-daily dosing for 12 weeks (NCT01103414)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionnM (Mean)
Mitoglitazone 50 mg Capsules0.00
Mitoglitazone 100 mg Capsules0.05
Mitoglitazone 150 mg Capsules0.10
Pioglitazone 45 mg Capsules0.20
Matching Placebo0.00

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 12 Endpoint

Effects of 3 different doses of Mitoglitazone and pioglitazone as compared to placebo on body weight following once-daily dosing for 12 (NCT01103414)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Mitoglitazone 50 mg Capsules0.23
Mitoglitazone 100 mg Capsules0.56
Mitoglitazone 150 mg Capsules1.15
Pioglitazone 45 mg Capsules1.53
Matching Placebo-0.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 Endpoint in Hematocrit

Change from baseline to week 12 endpoint in hematocrit as an indication of fluid retention (NCT01103414)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of volume (Least Squares Mean)
Mitoglitazone 50 mg Capsules0.0
Mitoglitazone 100 mg Capsules-0.9
Mitoglitazone 150 mg Capsules-1.0
Pioglitazone 45 mg Capsules-1.7
Matching Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Week 12 Endpoint

Effects of 3 different doses of Mitoglitazone and pioglitazone as compared to placebo on waist circumference following once-daily dosing for 12 weeks (NCT01103414)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventioncm (Mean)
Mitoglitazone 50 mg Capsules0.1
Mitoglitazone 100 mg Capsules-0.2
Mitoglitazone 150 mg Capsules-0.4
Pioglitazone 45 mg Capsules0.7
Matching Placebo-0.9

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 Endpoint in HMW Adiponectin

Percent change from baseline to week 12 endpoint in high molecular weight adiponectin (NCT01103414)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of baseline values (Least Squares Mean)
Mitoglitazone 50 mg Capsules45.2
Mitoglitazone 100 mg Capsules94.4
Mitoglitazone 150 mg Capsules132.4
Pioglitazone 45 mg Capsules287.0
Matching Placebo4.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in RBC

Change from baseline at week 12 endpoint in red blood cell concentration (NCT01103414)
Timeframe: 12 week

Intervention10e-6 cells per uL (Mean)
Mitoglitazone 50 mg Capsules-0.014
Mitoglitazone 100 mg Capsules-0.098
Mitoglitazone 150 mg Capsules-0.107
Pioglitazone 45 mg Capsules-0.211
Matching Placebo0.035

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 12.

Change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose in response to three different doses of Mitoglitazone as compared to pioglitazone following once-daily dosing for 84 consecutive days (12 weeks) in patients with Type 2 diabetes. (NCT01103414)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Mitoglitazone 50 mg Capsules-5.3
Mitoglitazone 100 mg Capsules-14.6
Mitoglitazone 150 mg Capsules-25.1
Pioglitazone 45 mg Capsules-27.2
Matching Placebo3.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin

Change from baseline at week 12 endpoint in hemoglobin concentration (NCT01103414)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Mitoglitazone 50 mg Capsules-0.07
Mitoglitazone 100 mg Capsules-0.38
Mitoglitazone 150 mg Capsules-0.33
Pioglitazone 45 mg Capsules-0.60
Matching Placebo-0.07

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c

Change from baseline in plasma glucose measured by hemoglobin A1c in response to three different doses of Mitoglitazone and pioglitazone as compared to placebo following once-daily dosing for 84 consecutive days (12 weeks) in patients with Type 2 diabetes. (NCT01103414)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Mitoglitazone 50 mg Capsules-0.10
Mitoglitazone 100 mg Capsules-0.49
Mitoglitazone 150 mg Capsules-0.57
Pioglitazone 45 mg Capsules-0.69
Matching Placebo0.29

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26

The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c<7% at Week 26 in each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the percentage. (NCT01106690)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Placebo/Sitagliptin32.5
Canagliflozin 100 mg46.9
Canagliflozin 300 mg64.3

[back to top]

Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106690)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Sitagliptin15.2
Canagliflozin 100 mg3.2
Canagliflozin 300 mg-1.7

[back to top]

Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106690)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Sitagliptin2.4
Canagliflozin 100 mg7.2
Canagliflozin 300 mg8.9

[back to top]

Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106690)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Sitagliptin-0.1
Canagliflozin 100 mg-2.8
Canagliflozin 300 mg-3.8

[back to top]

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106690)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Sitagliptin-1.24
Canagliflozin 100 mg-5.30
Canagliflozin 300 mg-4.70

[back to top]

Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA2-%B) From Baseline to Week 26

HOMA2-%B is a measure of beta cell function (the cells in the pancreas that produce and store insulin). The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HOMA2-%B from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106690)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionHOMA2-%B (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Sitagliptin0.91
Canagliflozin 100 mg15.19
Canagliflozin 300 mg18.14

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106690)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Sitagliptin-0.26
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.89
Canagliflozin 300 mg-1.03

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106690)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Sitagliptin2.54
Canagliflozin 100 mg-26.8
Canagliflozin 300 mg-33.2

[back to top]

Change in Insulin Resistance

Change in insulin resistance was calculated as change (end of treatment minus baseline) in HOMA-IR index (glucose (mg/dL) x insulin (μU/mL)/405) (NCT01135394)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionHOMA-IR index is unitless by definition (Mean)
Pioglitazone (Actos)-0.83

[back to top]

the Comparison Between Treatment Groups of the Changes From Baseline in HbA1c at 48 Weeks

(NCT01147627)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Mean)
Exenatide-1.8
Premixed Insulin Analog-1.74
Thiazolidinedione-1.47

[back to top]

HDL Apolipoprotein Levels at Study End-point

Lipoproteins will be isolated and analyzed using the gradient ultracentrifugation-high pressure liquid chromatography technique to isolate very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL), LDL, and high density lipoprotein (HDL) subfractions. Protein and lipid compositions of HDL is determined (NCT01156597)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
HDL-apoAI at end pointHDL-apoAII at end pointHDL-apoCI at end pointHDL-apoCII at end pointHDL-apoCIII at end pointHDL-apoM at end point
Comparator Group65.722.68.42.812.50.43
Pioglitazone Group65.026.610.93.511.80.62

[back to top]

Increased HDL-Cholesterol and Decreased Triglycerides

"The primary endpoint will be increased high density lipoprotein cholesterol and decreased triglycerides measured as the difference after 12 or 24 weeks of treatment from baseline levels. The data are expressed as the percent change from the baseline value and calculated using he equation:~Change=[100%*(Endpoint value - Baseline Value)/Baseline Value]" (NCT01156597)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
Intervention% Change (Mean)
% Change in HDL cholesterol at 12 weeks% Change in HDL cholesterol at 24 weeks% Change in triglycerides at 12 weeks% Change in triglycerides at 24 weeks
Comparator Group2.7-1.57.419.7
Pioglitazone Group7.915.7-10.9-15.4

[back to top]

Cholesterol Efflux Capacity of HDL

The ability of serum HDL to remove cholesterol from cultured cells will be assessed as an in vitro method to evaluate a functional changes in HDL mediated by changes due to pioglitazone treatment. Cells were incubated with 2% serum from each study subject diluted in culture medium and incubations were performed for a total of 4 hours. Cholesterol efflux was calculated as the percent of cholesterol removed from the cells and appearing in the culture medium normalized to a reference serum pool as described in detail by de la Llera-Moya et al (de la Llera-Moya M, Drazul-Schrader D, Asztalos BF, Cuchel M, Rader DJ, Rothblat GH. The ability to promote efflux via ABCA1 determines the capacity of serum specimens with similar high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to remove cholesterol from macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010 Apr;30(4):796-801. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.199158. PMID: 20075420). (NCT01156597)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Pioglitazone Group1.02
Comparator Group1.05

[back to top]

Occurrence of Relative Efficacy Response (HbA1c Lowering by at Least 0.5% After 30 Weeks of Treatment)

Glycosylated hemoglobin is reported as a percentage of the total hemoglobin. (NCT01183013)
Timeframe: Baseline and 30 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pio1579
Pio3083
Pio4590
Lina554
Lina5Pio1579
Lina5Pio3091
Lina5Pio45107

[back to top]

HbA1c Change From Baseline by Visit Over Time

"HbA1c is measured as a percentage. The change from baseline is the HbA1c over time minus the baseline HbA1c. The model includes fixed effects for treatment, continuous baseline HbA1c, prior andi-diabetic medication, country, visit and treatment.~by visit interaction." (NCT01183013)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 6, week 12, week 18, week 24, week 30

,,,,,,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Change to week 6 (N=121,133,133,130,119,124,125)Change to week 12 (N=112,124,127,122,111,117,120)Change to week 18 (N=101,121,122,112,104,104,115)Change to week 24 (N=91,108,110,95,92,96,109)Change to week 30 (N=78,93,91,79,86,87,97)
Lina5-0.23-0.36-0.39-0.39-0.37
Lina5Pio15-0.43-0.71-0.81-0.84-0.87
Lina5Pio30-0.47-0.92-1.07-1.10-1.09
Lina5Pio45-0.62-1.01-1.22-1.23-1.27
Pio15-0.22-0.47-0.63-0.75-0.77
Pio30-0.16-0.43-0.58-0.67-0.73
Pio45-0.20-0.59-0.82-0.87-0.94

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c After 30 Weeks of Treatment.

HbA1c is measured as a percentage. The change from baseline is the Week 30 HbA1c minus the baseline HbA1c. (NCT01183013)
Timeframe: Baseline and 30 weeks

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Pio15-0.66
Pio30-0.69
Pio45-0.87
Lina5-0.39
Lina5Pio15-0.83
Lina5Pio30-1.06
Lina5Pio45-1.28

[back to top]

Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Change From Baseline After 30 Weeks of Treatment

The change from baseline is the FPG after 30 weeks minus the baseline FPG. (NCT01183013)
Timeframe: Baseline and 30 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Pio15-15.16
Pio30-25.49
Pio45-28.69
Lina5-1.46
Lina5Pio15-18.84
Lina5Pio30-27.33
Lina5Pio45-35.19

[back to top]

Incidence of Rescue Therapy During the First 30 Weeks of Treatment

Rescue therapy was defined to include any new antidiabetic medication taken for hyperglycemia and introduced on or after the start date of study treatment and before the end date of study treatment. (NCT01183013)
Timeframe: 30 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pio1520
Pio3017
Pio4511
Lina526
Lina5Pio1512
Lina5Pio3010
Lina5Pio455

[back to top]

Occurrence of Cumulative Treat to Target Efficacy Response, of HbA1c Under Treatment of < 6.5% After 30 Weeks of Treatment

Glycosylated hemoglobin is reported as a percentage of the total hemoglobin. (NCT01183013)
Timeframe: Baseline and 30 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pio1520
Pio3028
Pio4539
Lina514
Lina5Pio1524
Lina5Pio3038
Lina5Pio4543

[back to top]

Occurrence of Cumulative Treat to Target Efficacy Response, of HbA1c Under Treatment of < 7.0% After 30 Weeks of Treatment

Glycosylated hemoglobin is reported as a percentage of the total hemoglobin. (NCT01183013)
Timeframe: Baseline and 30 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pio1539
Pio3055
Pio4568
Lina529
Lina5Pio1545
Lina5Pio3061
Lina5Pio4581

[back to top]

Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Change From Baseline by Visit Over Time

The change from baseline is the FPG over time minus the baseline FPG. Model includes fixed effects for treatment, continuous baseline FPG, continuous baseline HbA1c, prior anti-diabetic medication, country, visit and treatment by visit interaction (NCT01183013)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 6, week 12, week 18, week 24, week 30

,,,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Change at week 6 (N=118,132,133,130,119,122,124)Change at week 12 (N=111,124,126,122,108,114,118)Change at week 18 (N=100,122,121,111,104,103,114)Change at week 24 (N=90,108,108,96,93,93,108)Change at week 30 (N=76,91,89,79,82,87,98)
Lina5-4.25-7.43-7.06-4.60-0.09
Lina5Pio15-19.25-17.99-19.01-16.68-17.93
Lina5Pio30-26.89-31.25-31.22-31.48-27.11
Lina5Pio45-28.36-28.53-30.66-31.49-34.04
Pio15-14.43-10.63-16.68-16.25-17.66
Pio30-16.38-21.36-20.69-21.57-26.09
Pio45-15.72-25.30-28.68-27.67-31.76

[back to top]

Two-hour Postprandial Glucose (2hPPG) Change From Baseline at Week 30 by Meal Tolerance Test (MTT)

The change from baseline is the 2hPPG after 30 weeks minus the baseline 2hPPG. (NCT01183013)
Timeframe: Baseline and 30 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pio15-30.65
Pio30-83.00
Pio45-82.98
Lina5-51.61
Lina5Pio15-67.26
Lina5Pio30-87.94
Lina5Pio45-84.77

[back to top]

Time to First Use of Rescue Therapy

Proportion of patients at 30 weeks with rescue therapy using Kaplan-Meier analysis. (NCT01183013)
Timeframe: 30 weeks

,,,,,,
InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Proportion event-freeStandard Error
Lina50.77560.0390
Lina5Pio150.88540.0313
Lina5Pio300.90780.0279
Lina5Pio450.95480.0198
Pio150.81170.0382
Pio300.85330.0330
Pio450.90510.0273

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in TG/HDL Ratio at One Year

Triglyceride ratio to High Density Lipoprotien (NCT01186250)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

Interventionratio (Mean)
Pioglitazone-0.03
Placebo-1.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (HsCRP) at One Year

measure of low levels of C-reactive protein to identify low but persistent levels of inflammation (NCT01186250)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Pioglitazone-3
Placebo2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in ADMA (Asymmetric Dimethylarginine) at One Year.

Competitive ELISA assay in Stanford laboratory. (NCT01186250)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

Interventionumol/L (Mean)
Pioglitazone-0.05
Placebo-0.02

[back to top]

Change in Maximal Intimal Thickness(MIT) by Intravascular Unltrasound(IVUS)

The change in maximal intimal thickness (MIT) from baseline to one year was recorded for several matched sites in the same coronary artery, the cross sections, predominantly in the left anterior descending coronary artery, from baseline to one-year follow-up, were studied. The IVUS cross sections were matched by using identifiable landmarks in the images, such as bifurcations or arterial calcification, or external landmarks, such as coronary veins or pericardium. In addition, the one-year IVUS studies were obtained with an angiographic roadmap of where the initial IVUS study was performed along the length of the vessel. The IVUS system auto pullback was performed at .5 mm/s from the mid-distal portion of the study vessel, where an easily identifiable landmark was visible (i.e., branchpoint). The following items were measured for each patient: maximal intimal thickness (MIT), intimal area (IA), and vessel area. (NCT01186250)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

Interventionmm (Mean)
Pioglitazone-0.01
Placebo-0.02

[back to top]

Insulin Levels Area Under Curve(AUC)

Change from baseline in Insulin Levels During Oral Glucose Tolerance test at 1 year. (NCT01186250)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

Interventionh*pmol/L (Mean)
Pioglitazone-47.7
Placebo10.7

[back to top]

Change in Levels of Fasting Glucose at Baseline and 1 Year

Oral Glucose Tolerance Test : blood was drawn for fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels, followed by ingestion of a solution containing 75grams of glucose. Repeat blood samples were collected for glucose and insulin levels at 30, 90, and 120 minutes after glucose ingestion. All glucose measurements were performed by the Clinical Translational Research Unit (CTRU) Stanford University. (NCT01186250)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Pioglitazone2.1
Placebo11

[back to top]

Change in Intimal Volume

Intimal volume is defined as external elastic membrane volume minus lumen (luminal) volume measured at the heart Catheterization and intravascular Ultrasound( IVUS) (NCT01186250)
Timeframe: baseline and 1 year

Interventionmm^3 (Mean)
Pioglitazone12.2
Placebo-26.8

[back to top]

Percentages of Patients With Total Adverse Events (AE)

percentages of total adverse events (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage (Number)
Sitagliptin43.1
Pioglitazone51.7

[back to top]

Percentages of Patients With Severe Hypoglycemia

Proportion of severe hypoglycemia after treatment (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage (Number)
Sitagliptin0
Pioglitazone0

[back to top]

The Percentages of Patient Achieving an A1C <7%

The percentages of patient achieving an A1C <7% at endpoint (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage (Number)
Sitagliptin28.3
Pioglitazone28.8

[back to top]

Baseline Homoeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

Baseline HOMA-IR (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: Baseline HOMA-IR

InterventionHOMA-IR score (Mean)
Sitagliptin5.6
Pioglitazone4.8

[back to top]

Percentages of Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypoglycemia

Incidence of mild to moderate hypoglycemia after treatment (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage (Number)
Sitagliptin10
Pioglitazone8.5

[back to top]

Percentages of Patients With Gastrointestinal Adverse Events

Proportion of Gastrointestinal adverse events after treatment (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentge (Number)
Sitagliptin20.0
Pioglitazone6.8

[back to top]

Percentages of Patients With Edema

proportion of edema after treatment (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage (Number)
Sitagliptin0
Pioglitazone27.1

[back to top]

Mean Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (A1C)

A1C change from baseline to 24 weeks (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of Hb (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.71
Pioglitazone-0.94

[back to top]

Changes in Homoeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

HOMA-IR change from baseline to 24 weeks (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionHOMA-IR score (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.00
Pioglitazone-1.56

[back to top]

Changes in High Sensitive C-reactive Protein

fasting high sensitive serum C-reactive protein change from baseline to 24 weeks (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionmg/dl (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.07
Pioglitazone-0.19

[back to top]

Changes in Fasting Plasma Glucose

fasting serum sugar change from baseline to 24 weeks (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionmg/dl (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-23
Pioglitazone-36

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Total-cholesterol

Total-cholesterol change from baseline to 24 weeks (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionmg/dl (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin0.6
Pioglitazone9.9

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Alanine-aminotransferase (ALT)

ALT change from baseline to 24 weeks (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionIU/L (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.0
Pioglitazone-4.5

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

LDL-C change from baseline to 24 weeks (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionmg/dl (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-1.2
Pioglitazone6.6

[back to top]

Change in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol(HDL-C)

HDL-C change from baseline to 24 weeks (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionmg/dl (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin1.3
Pioglitazone6.3

[back to top]

Body Weight Change

body weight change from baseline to 24 weeks (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.26
Pioglitazone1.34

[back to top]

Baseline Triglyceride (TG)

Baseline TG (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Sitagliptin137
Pioglitazone164

[back to top]

Baseline Total Cholesterol

Baseline Total cholesterol (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Sitagliptin174
Pioglitazone194

[back to top]

Baseline Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Baseline LDL-C (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Sitagliptin102
Pioglitazone111

[back to top]

Baseline High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)

Baseline HDL-C (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Sitagliptin42
Pioglitazone43

[back to top]

Baseline High Sensitive C-reactive Protein

Baseline high sensitive C-reactive Protein (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: baseline

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Sitagliptin0.38
Pioglitazone0.42

[back to top]

Baseline Fasting Plasma Glucose

Baseline fasting plasma glucose (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: baseline

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Sitagliptin177
Pioglitazone182

[back to top]

Baseline Body Weight

Baseline body weight (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionkg (Mean)
Sitagliptin69.4
Pioglitazone65.4

[back to top]

Baseline Alanine-aminotransferase (ALT)

Baseline alanine-aminotransferase (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Sitagliptin34.2
Pioglitazone28.5

[back to top]

Baseline A1C

baseline A1C (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionpercentage of Hb (Mean)
Sitagliptin8.27
Pioglitazone8.54

[back to top]

Percentages of Patients With Nasopharyngitis

Proportion of Nasopharyngitis after treatment (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage (Number)
Sitagliptin20.0
Pioglitazone18.6

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Triglycerides(TG)

TG change from baseline to 24 weeks (NCT01195090)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionmg/dl (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin6.3
Pioglitazone-23.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event During the 66-week Extension Period

An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an adverse event. Data presented below excludes data after the initiation of glycemic rescue. (NCT01217073)
Timeframe: Up to 70 Weeks (Weeks 12 to 78 plus 4-week follow-up period)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Pooled Omarigliptin (Extension)66.8
Placebo/Metformin (Extension)65.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2 Hour-post-meal Glucose (2h-PMG) Levels at Week 12

Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline level from the Week 12 level. (NCT01217073)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Omarigliptin 0.25 mg (Base)-11.3
Omarigliptin 1 mg (Base)-26.0
Omarigliptin 3 mg (Base)-27.5
Omarigliptin 10 mg (Base)-34.0
Omarigliptin 25 mg (Base)-37.3
Placebo (Base)7.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2h-PMG at Week 78

Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline level from the Week 78 level. (NCT01217073)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 78

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Omarigliptin 0.25 mg (Base)/25 mg (Extension)-37.0
Omarigliptin 1 mg (Base)/25 mg (Extension)-21.3
Omarigliptin 3 mg (Base)/25 mg (Extension)-18.0
Omarigliptin 10 mg (Base)/25 mg (Extension)-27.6
Omarigliptin 25 mg (Base)/25 mg (Extension)-43.2
Placebo (Base)/Metformin (Extension)-40.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Levels at Week 12

Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline level from the Week 12 level. (NCT01217073)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Omarigliptin 0.25 mg (Base)1.2
Omarigliptin 1 mg (Base)-15.3
Omarigliptin 3 mg (Base)-10.6
Omarigliptin 10 mg (Base)-9.8
Omarigliptin 25 mg (Base)-17.7
Placebo (Base)3.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FPG Levels at Week 78

Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline level from the Week 78 level. (NCT01217073)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 78

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Omarigliptin 0.25 mg (Base)/25 mg (Extension)-7.4
Omarigliptin 1 mg (Base)/25 mg (Extension)-11.3
Omarigliptin 3 mg (Base)/25 mg (Extension)-2.0
Omarigliptin 10 mg (Base)/25 mg (Extension)-10.0
Omarigliptin 25 mg (Base)/25 mg (Extension)-0.7
Placebo (Base)/Metformin (Extension)-19.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Plasma A1C Levels at Week 12

A1C levels were measured as a percent. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline level from the Week 12 level. (NCT01217073)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Omarigliptin 0.25 mg (Base)-0.14
Omarigliptin 1 mg (Base)-0.36
Omarigliptin 3 mg (Base)-0.35
Omarigliptin 10 mg (Base)-0.53
Omarigliptin 25 mg (Base)-0.57
Placebo (Base)0.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Plasma A1C Levels at Week 78

A1C levels were measured as a percent. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline level from the Week 78 level. (NCT01217073)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 78

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Omarigliptin 0.25 mg (Base)/25 mg (Extension)-0.57
Omarigliptin 1 mg (Base)/25 mg (Extension)-0.55
Omarigliptin 3 mg (Base)/25 mg (Extension)-0.30
Omarigliptin 10 mg (Base)/25 mg (Extension)-0.60
Omarigliptin 25 mg (Base)/25 mg (Extension)-0.46
Placebo (Base)/Metformin (Extension)-0.88

[back to top]

Mean 2h-PMG Level at Baseline of the Extension Period

Plasma 2h-PMG levels were measured at baseline (Week 0) for participants who entered the extension period. (NCT01217073)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Pooled Omarigliptin (Extension)232.8
Placebo/Metformin (Extension)244.5

[back to top]

Mean FPG Level at Baseline of the Extension Period

Plasma FPG levels were measured at baseline (Week 0) for particiapnts who entered the extension period. (NCT01217073)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Pooled Omarigliptin (Extension)169.4
Placebo/Metformin (Extension)172.9

[back to top]

Mean Plasma A1C Level at Baseline of the Extension Period

A1C levels were measured as a percent at baseline (Week 0) for participants who entered the extension period. (NCT01217073)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0)

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Pooled Omarigliptin (Extension)8.0
Placebo/Metformin (Extension)8.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event During the 66-week Extension Period

An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an adverse event. Data presented below excludes data after the initiation of glycemic rescue. (NCT01217073)
Timeframe: Up to 66 weeks (Weeks 12 to 78)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Pooled Omarigliptin (Extension)3.8
Placebo/Metformin (Extension)5.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event During the 12-week Base Period

An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an adverse event. Data presented below excludes data after the initiation of glycemic rescue. (NCT01217073)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Omarigliptin 0.25 mg (Base)0.9
Omarigliptin 1 mg (Base)0
Omarigliptin 3 mg (Base)0.9
Omarigliptin 10 mg (Base)0
Omarigliptin 25 mg (Base)3.5
Placebo (Base)0.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event During the Base Period

An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an adverse event. Data presented below excludes data after the initiation of glycemic rescue. (NCT01217073)
Timeframe: Up to 16 weeks (including 28 days following the last dose of study drug)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Omarigliptin 0.25 mg (Base)37.2
Omarigliptin 1 mg (Base)43.5
Omarigliptin 3 mg (Base)36.8
Omarigliptin 10 mg (Base)36.5
Omarigliptin 25 mg (Base)33.3
Placebo (Base)31.0

[back to top]

Percentage (%) of Haemoglobin A1C

HbA1c (Haemoglobin A1c) is glycosylated haemoglobin, measured as a % of total Hb in red blood cells by a standard biochemical method (HPLC). (NCT01223196)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
InterventionPercentage (%) of HbA1c (Mean)
HbA1c - baselineHbA1c- after 6 months
Pioglitazone7.06.5
Placebo8.07.7

[back to top]

Whole Body Insulin Sensitivity During the Euglycemic Insulin Clamp

"Insulin sensitivity was measured by the euglycemic clamp before and 6 months after PIO (PIOGLITAZONE) or PLAC (PLACEBO) treatment.~The outcome measure is Insulin sensitivity obtained from euglycemic insulin clamp and it is called M/I, where M = whole body glucose uptake during the euglycemic insulin clamp and I = circulating insulin levels during the euglycemic insulin clamp. It is expressed as Mg. of glucose/kg body weight/mU (milli Unit)x l (liter).of insulin (Ins)" (NCT01223196)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
InterventionMg. of glucose/kg body w./mUxl ins. (Mean)
M/I at baselineM/I after 6 months of treatment
Pioglitazone3.013.7
Placebo3.23.4

[back to top]

Effect of Pioglitazone on TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) Alpha Converting Enzyme (TACE) Activity in Skeletal Muscle.

The activity of TACE is measured by detecting the release of a fluorogenic synthetic substrate of TACE and measuring in a fluorometer. It is expressed in Fluorescence Units (F.U.) (NCT01223196)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
InterventionTace Activity in F.U./mg prot (Mean)
TACE Activity at baseline (F.U./mg/prot)TACE Activity after 6 months(F.U./mg/prot)
Pioglitazone0.280.06
Placebo0.20.15

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Day 29 in Body Weight

Difference is calculated as the change in body weight in Least Square Mean (LSM) from baseline to Day 29 of each treatment group (pioglitazone, JNJ-41443532 250 mg, JNJ-41443532 1000 mg, and placebo). The statistical analyses shows the treatment differences (ie, each study medication group minus placebo) in the LSM change. (NCT01230749)
Timeframe: From baseline to Day 29

InterventionKilograms (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.75
JNJ41443532 250 mg-1.18
JNJ41443532 1000 mg-0.19
Placebo-1.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Day 28 in Insulin Resistance

Difference is calculated as the change in insulin resistance in Least Square Mean (LSM) from baseline to Day 28 of each treatment group (pioglitazone, JNJ-41443532 250 mg, JNJ-41443532 1000 mg, and placebo). The statistical analyses shows the treatment differences (ie, each study medication group minus placebo) in the LSM change. Insuline sensitivity is measured by absolute change in Homeostasis Model Assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Insulin sensitivity is HOMA-%S and HOMA-IR is the reciprocal of HOMA-%S. HOMA-IR calculated as: (Glucose [mg/dL]) multiplied by Insulin [pmol/L]) divided by (405 multiplied by 6.945). Lower value is better (signifies improvement relative to baseline). (NCT01230749)
Timeframe: From baseline to Day 28

InterventionHOMA-IR score (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 30 mg-1.52
JNJ41443532 250 mg0.07
JNJ41443532 1000 mg-0.35
Placebo0.33

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Day 28 in Insulin Secretion

Difference is calculated as the change in insulin secretion in Least Square Mean (LSM) from baseline to Day 28 of each treatment group (pioglitazone, JNJ-41443532 250 mg, JNJ-41443532 1000 mg, and placebo). The statistical analyses shows the treatment differences (ie, each study medication group minus placebo) in the LSM change. Insulin secretion is measured by the absolute change in Homeostasis Model Assessment of steady state islet beta cell (HOMA-%B). HOMA-%B calculated as: (360 multiplied by Insulin [pmol/L]) divided by ([Glucose {mg/dL} minus 63] multiplied by 6.945). Higher value is better (signifies improvement relative to baseline). (NCT01230749)
Timeframe: From baseline to Day 28

InterventionHOMA-B score (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 30 mg-4.00
JNJ41443532 250 mg6.94
JNJ41443532 1000 mg-0.89
Placebo-6.76

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Day 28 in Systemic Levels of Interleukin 18 (IL-18)

Difference is calculated as the geometric mean change in IL-18 from baseline to Day 28 of each treatment group (JNJ-41443532 250 mg, JNJ-41443532 1000 mg, and placebo). The statistical analyses shows the treatment differences (ie, each study medication group minus placebo) in the geometric mean change. IL-18 was not measured for pioglitazone group. The unit of IL-18 is picograms per milliliter (pg/mL) (NCT01230749)
Timeframe: From baseline to Day 28

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
JNJ41443532 250 mg1.02
JNJ41443532 1000 mg1.03
Placebo1.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Day 28 in Systemic Levels of Interleukin 6 (IL-6)

Difference is calculated as the geometric mean change in IL-6 from baseline to Day 28 of each treatment group (JNJ-41443532 250 mg, JNJ-41443532 1000 mg, and placebo). The statistical analyses shows the treatment differences (ie, each study medication group minus placebo) in the geometric mean change. IL-6 is a systemic inflammatory markers and is an independent predictors of insulin resistance and progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus. IL-6 was not measured for pioglitazone guoup. The unit of IL-6 is picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). (NCT01230749)
Timeframe: From baseline to Day 28

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
JNJ41443532 250 mg0.86
JNJ41443532 1000 mg0.81
Placebo0.91

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Day 28 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Difference is calculated as the change in FPG in Least Square Mean (LSM) from baseline to Day 28 of each treatment group (pioglitazone, JNJ-41443532 250 mg, JNJ-41443532 1000 mg, and placebo). The statistical analyses shows the treatment differences (ie, each study medication group minus placebo) in the LSM change. (NCT01230749)
Timeframe: From baseline to Day 28

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 30 mg-14.57
JNJ41443532 250 mg-8.26
JNJ41443532 1000 mg-4.00
Placebo13.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 28 in Twenty-Four-Hour Weighted Average Glucose (24-Hour WAG)

Difference is calculated as the change in 24-hour WAG in Least Square Mean (LSM) from baseline to Day 28 of each treatment group (pioglitazone, JNJ-41443532 250 mg, JNJ-41443532 1000 mg, and placebo). The statistical analyses shows the treatment differences (ie, each study medication group minus placebo) in the LSM change. 24-hour WAG is defined as the area under the plasma glucose concentration time curve over 0 to 24 hours, divided by 24. (NCT01230749)
Timeframe: From baseline (Day -1) to Day 28

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone 30 mg-18.88
JNJ41443532 250 mg-11.95
JNJ41443532 1000 mg-4.72
Placebo8.52

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Day 28 in Systemic Levels of C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

Difference is calculated as the geometric mean change in CRP from baseline to Day 28 of each treatment group (JNJ-41443532 250 mg, JNJ-41443532 1000 mg, and placebo). The statistical analyses shows the treatment differences (ie, each study medication group minus placebo) in the geometric mean change. CRP was not measured for pioglitazone group. (NCT01230749)
Timeframe: From baseline to Day 28

Interventionmg/dL (Geometric Mean)
JNJ41443532 250 mg1.12
JNJ41443532 1000 mg0.86
Placebo0.84

[back to top]

AUC0-tz of Pioglitazone

Area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 to the time of the last quantifiable data point (NCT01276327)
Timeframe: 0-72 hours (measurements at baseline, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours)

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
FDC L5P30 (Test)6370
L5+P30 (Ref)8100

[back to top]

AUC0-72 of Linagliptin

Area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 to 72 hours (NCT01276327)
Timeframe: 0-72 hours (measurements at baseline, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours)

Interventionnmol*h/L (Geometric Mean)
FDC L5P30 (Test)278
L5+P30 (Ref)279

[back to top]

AUC0-tz for Linagliptin

Area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 to the time of the last quantifiable data point for Linagliptin (NCT01276327)
Timeframe: 0-72 hours (measurements at baseline, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours)

Interventionnmol*h/L (Geometric Mean)
FDC L5P30 (Test)278
L5+P30 (Ref)279

[back to top]

AUC0-∞ of Linagliptin

Area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 hours extrapolated to infinity (inf) for linagliptin (NCT01276327)
Timeframe: 0-72 hours (measurements at baseline, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours)

Interventionnmol*h/L (Geometric Mean)
FDC L5P30 (Test)455
L5+P30 (Ref)447

[back to top]

AUC0-∞ of Pioglitazone

Area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 hours extrapolated to inf for pioglitazone (NCT01276327)
Timeframe: 0-72 hours (measurements at baseline, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours)

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
FDC L5P30 (Test)6580
L5+P30 (Ref)8300

[back to top]

Cmax of Linagliptin

Maximum measured concentration of the analyte in plasma was measured. Adjusted by-treatment geometric mean and CV were reported. (NCT01276327)
Timeframe: 0-72 hours (measurements at baseline, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours)

Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
FDC L5P30 (Test)8.65
L5+P30 (Ref)9.09

[back to top]

Cmax of Pioglitazone

Maximum concentration of the analyte in plasma was measured. Adjusted by-treatment geometric mean and CV were calculated. (NCT01276327)
Timeframe: 0-72 hours (measurements at baseline, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
FDC L5P30 (Test)806
L5+P30 (Ref)843

[back to top]

Tmax for Linagliptin

Time from dosing to the maximum measured concentration of the analyte in plasma for Linagliptin (NCT01276327)
Timeframe: 0-72 hours (measurements at baseline, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours)

Interventionhours (Median)
FDC L5P30 (Test)1.73
L5+P30 (Ref)1.50

[back to top]

Tmax for Pioglitazone

Time from dosing to the maximum measured concentration of the analyte in plasma for pioglitazone (NCT01276327)
Timeframe: 0-72 hours (measurements at baseline, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours)

Interventionhours (Median)
FDC L5P30 (Test)1.00
L5+P30 (Ref)1.50

[back to top]

Change in the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (DRS-2)From Baseline to 44 Weeks

The Mattis dementia rating scale is a psychometric instrument designed to assess the extent and nature of dementia. Mattis Dementia Rating scale (DRS-2) raw score is the sum of 5 raw sub-scores (attention has possible 37 points, initiation/perseveration has possible 37 points, construction has possible 6 points, conceptualization has possible 39 points, memory has possible 25 points). Total range is 0-144. Higher scores are better. (NCT01280123)
Timeframe: 44 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
15 mg Pioglitazone1.16
45 mg Pioglitazone2.11
Matching Placebo3.16

[back to top]

Change in Ambulatory Capacity From Baseline to 44 Weeks

"This is the sum of the 5 UPDRS questions regarding ambulatory capacity: falling, freezing, walking, gait, postural stability.~Ambulatory Capacity is calculated as the sum of items 13-15, 29, 30 of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). It ranges from 0-20. Higher scores are worse. Change is 44 weeks - baseline." (NCT01280123)
Timeframe: 44 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
15 mg Pioglitazone0.39
45 mg Pioglitazone0.38
Matching Placebo0.4

[back to top]

Change in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) From Baseline to 44 Weeks

"The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) is a short, 39 item measure of quality of life in subjects with Parkinson's disease. The questionnaire covers 8 aspects of quality of life: mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognitions, communication and bodily discomfort.~The total score ranges from 0 (never have difficulty) to 100 (always have difficulty). Lower scores reflect better quality of life." (NCT01280123)
Timeframe: 44 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
15 mg Pioglitazone2.03
45 mg Pioglitazone2.08
Matching Placebo0.08

[back to top]

Change in Schwab and England Scale From Baseline to 44 Weeks

The modified Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living is a single question ranging from 0-100% with anchors for each 10% interval. Higher scores are better (100% completely independent- 0% vegetative). (NCT01280123)
Timeframe: 44 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
15 mg Pioglitazone-2.12
45 mg Pioglitazone-2.52
Matching Placebo-1.84

[back to top]

Change in the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15)From Baseline to 44 Weeks

The Geriatric Depression Scale - 15 is a short 15 yes or no question instrument for assessing depression in the elderly. It has been found to be particularly useful in assessing depression in Parkinson's Disease. A score of 0 to 5 is normal. A score greater than 5 suggests depression. (NCT01280123)
Timeframe: 44 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
15 mg Pioglitazone0.13
45 mg Pioglitazone0.38
Matching Placebo0.18

[back to top]

Change in Total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Score From Baseline to 44 Weeks

"Change in total UPDRS score from baseline to 44 weeks (in subjects treated with rasagiline 1 mg/day or selegiline 10 mg/day).~The Total UPDRS is the sum of parts I, II, and III. The possible range of the total UPDRS is from 0-176. Higher values indicate worse outcomes.~The change is 44 weeks - baseline." (NCT01280123)
Timeframe: 44 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
15 mg Pioglitazone4.42
45 mg Pioglitazone5.13
Matching Placebo6.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight

To characterize the effects of three different doses of MSDC-0602 and pioglitazone as compared to placebo on hematocrit, body weight, and edema following once-daily dosing for 28 consecutive days in patients with Type 2 diabetes. (NCT01280695)
Timeframe: Baseline and 28 days

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.12
MSDC-0602 100 mg0.25
MSDC-0602 250 mg-0.07
MSDC-0602 500 mg0.17
Pioglitazone 45 mg0.54

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose

To characterize the reduction in fasting plasma glucose in response to three different doses of MSDC-0602 Tablets as compared to placebo following once-daily dosing for 28 consecutive days in patients with Type 2 diabetes. (NCT01280695)
Timeframe: Baseline and 28 days

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
Placebo6.0
MSDC-0602 100 mg-0.5
MSDC-0602 250 mg-20.0
MSDC-0602 500 mg-16.0
Pioglitazone 45 mg-22.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit

To characterize the effects of three different doses of MSDC-0602 and pioglitazone as compared to placebo in hematocrit following once-daily dosing for 28 consecutive days in patients with Type 2 diabetes. (NCT01280695)
Timeframe: Baseline and 28 days

InterventionChange from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.9
MSDC-0602 100 mg-0.9
MSDC-0602 250 mg-1.2
MSDC-0602 500 mg-1.7
Pioglitazone 45 mg-1.4

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Insulin

To characterize the effects of 3 different doses of MSDC-0602 and pioglitazone as compared to placebo on insulin following once-daily dosing for 28 consecutive days (NCT01280695)
Timeframe: Baseline and 28 days

InterventionµIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.06
MSDC-0602 100 mg-1.70
MSDC-0602 250 mg-1.11
MSDC-0602 500 mg-2.13
Pioglitazone 45 mg-3.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c

To explore the drug effect difference in the reduction in hemoglobin A1c in response to three different doses of MSDC-0602 and pioglitazone (45 mg Actos®) as compared to placebo following once-daily dosing for 28 consecutive days in patients with Type 2 diabetes. (NCT01280695)
Timeframe: Baseline and 28 days

Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.14
MSDC-0602 100 mg0.09
MSDC-0602 250 mg-0.10
MSDC-0602 500 mg-0.17
Pioglitazone 45 mg-0.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High Molecular Weight Adiponectin

To evaluate the effects of three different doses of MSDC-0602 and pioglitazone as compared to placebo on biomarkers of inflammatory status (high molecular weight adiponectin) following once-daily dosing for 28 consecutive days in patients with Type 2 diabetes. (NCT01280695)
Timeframe: Baseline and 28 days

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.6
MSDC-0602 100 mg44.1
MSDC-0602 250 mg101.6
MSDC-0602 500 mg139.2
Pioglitazone 45 mg206.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c ≥2.0%

Clinical response was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 2.0% at Week 16. (NCT01289119)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo2.2
Alogliptin Monotherapy8.9
Metformin0.0
Metformin + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy9.2
Pioglitazone1.6
Pioglitazone + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy3.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c ≥1.5%

Clinical response was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 1.5% at Week 16. (NCT01289119)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo7.8
Alogliptin Monotherapy23.3
Metformin1.0
Metformin + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy22.4
Pioglitazone7.9
Pioglitazone + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy8.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HbA1c ≤6.5% at Week 16

Clinical response was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) less than or equal to 6.5% at Week 16. (NCT01289119)
Timeframe: Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo12.2
Alogliptin Monotherapy36.7
Metformin4.1
Metformin + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy21.4
Pioglitazone9.5
Pioglitazone + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy30.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c Over Time

The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12. Least squares means are derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect, and baseline HbA1c as a covariate for the monotherapy, baseline HbA1c with baseline metformin dose as covariates for the metformin therapy, baseline HbA1c with baseline metformin therapy status and baseline pioglitazone dose as covariates for the pioglitazone therapy. (NCT01289119)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12.

,,,,,
Interventionpercentage glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=90, 88, 97, 98, 63, 60)Week 8 (n=90, 90, 97, 98, 63, 60)Week 12 (n=90, 90, 97, 98, 63, 60)
Alogliptin Monotherapy-0.56-0.86-0.99
Metformin-0.15-0.15-0.24
Metformin + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy-0.43-0.66-0.86
Pioglitazone-0.09-0.31-0.25
Pioglitazone + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy-0.44-0.70-0.77
Placebo-0.24-0.39-0.41

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c ≥1.0%

Clinical response was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 1.0% at Week 16. (NCT01289119)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo20.0
Alogliptin Monotherapy50.0
Metformin9.3
Metformin + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy45.9
Pioglitazone19.0
Pioglitazone + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy46.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at Week 16. Least squares means are derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect, and baseline HbA1c as a covariate for the monotherapy, baseline HbA1c with baseline metformin dose as covariates for the metformin therapy, baseline HbA1c with baseline metformin therapy status and baseline pioglitazone dose as covariates for the pioglitazone therapy. (NCT01289119)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16.

Interventionpercentage glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.42
Alogliptin Monotherapy-0.99
Metformin-0.22
Metformin + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy-0.91
Pioglitazone-0.25
Pioglitazone + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy-0.76

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HbA1c ≤7.0% at Week 16

Clinical response was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) less than or equal to 7.0% at Week 16. (NCT01289119)
Timeframe: Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo30.0
Alogliptin Monotherapy63.3
Metformin25.8
Metformin + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy55.1
Pioglitazone31.7
Pioglitazone + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy61.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c ≥ 0.5%

Clinical response was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 0.5% at Week 16. (NCT01289119)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo41.1
Alogliptin Monotherapy84.4
Metformin37.1
Metformin + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy70.4
Pioglitazone42.9
Pioglitazone + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy76.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose Over Time

The change from Baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16. Least squares means are derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as a fixed effect, and baseline FPG as a covariate for the monotherapy, baseline FPG with baseline metformin dose as covariates for the metformin therapy, baseline FPG with baseline metformin therapy status and baseline pioglitazone dose as covariates for the pioglitazone therapy. (NCT01289119)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16.

,,,,,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=89, 87, 97, 97, 63, 60)Week 8 (n=89, 89, 97, 97, 63, 60)Week 12 (n=89, 89, 97, 97, 63, 60)Week 16 (n=89, 89, 97, 97, 63, 60)
Alogliptin Monotherapy-0.719-1.015-1.123-1.243
Metformin-0.251-0.235-0.335-0.512
Metformin + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy-0.985-1.265-1.270-1.240
Pioglitazone0.284-0.038-0.187-0.114
Pioglitazone + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy-0.985-0.924-1.177-1.070
Placebo-0.331-0.330-0.411-0.317

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight

The change between body weight measured at Baseline and body weight measured at Weeks 8 and 16. The least squares means are derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as a fixed effect, and baseline body weight as a covariate for the monotherapy, baseline body weight with baseline metformin dose as covariates for the add-on to metformin therapy, baseline body weight with baseline metformin therapy status and baseline pioglitazone dose as covariates for the add-on to pioglitazone therapy. (NCT01289119)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 16.

,,,,,
Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 8 (n=87, 86, 94, 96, 63, 59)Week 16 (n=88, 87, 94, 96, 63, 59)
Alogliptin Monotherapy-0.71-0.89
Metformin-0.82-1.06
Metformin + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy-0.43-0.76
Pioglitazone-0.74-0.68
Pioglitazone + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy-0.15-0.10
Placebo-1.04-1.55

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia

Marked Hyperglycemia was defined as fasting plasma glucose greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L). (NCT01289119)
Timeframe: Randomization to Week 16.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo16.9
Alogliptin Monotherapy4.5
Metformin25.8
Metformin + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy13.4
Pioglitazone23.8
Pioglitazone + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy8.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HbA1c ≤7.5% at Week 16

Clinical response was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) less than or equal to 7.5% at Week 16. (NCT01289119)
Timeframe: Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo53.3
Alogliptin Monotherapy81.1
Metformin50.5
Metformin + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy80.6
Pioglitazone47.6
Pioglitazone + Alogliptin Add-on Therapy85.0

[back to top]

Change in Intra-abdominal Fat Area by CT Scan

(NCT01289639)
Timeframe: 0-6 months

Interventionmm2 (Mean)
Arm 1885
Arm 2108

[back to top]

Change in Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity

Hepatic insulin sensitivity was determined using stable glucose isotope measurements during the low dose hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp to determine the rate of endogenous glucose production in the fasting state and in response to a low dose glucose infusion. The ability of insulin to suppress glucose, which is mainly produced by the liver, thus provides a measure of hepatic insulin sensitivity and is expressed as a percentage of the basal state. Change in the ability of low dose insulin to suppress endogenous glucose production during a labeled hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. (NCT01289639)
Timeframe: 0-6 months

Intervention% change from baseline (Mean)
Arm 123.3
Arm 24.9

[back to top]

Liver/Spleen Ratio Measured as the Ratio in Hounsfield Units Between the Liver and the Spleen on Computed Tomography (CT) Scan

(NCT01289639)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionratio (Mean)
Arm 1.85
Arm 2.60

[back to top]

Change in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels

(NCT01289639)
Timeframe: 0-6 months

InterventionU/L (Mean)
Arm 1-11.5
Arm 2-15.2

[back to top]

Change in Liver/Spleen Ratio Measure by the Density Ratio in Hounsfield Units Between the Liver and the Spleen by CT

(NCT01289639)
Timeframe: 0-6 months

Interventionratio (Mean)
Arm 1.09
Arm 2-0.16

[back to top]

Change in Peripheral Insulin Sensitivity

Change in the rate of glucose disposal (Rd) during the low dose clamp. During a clamp procedure, insulin is infused at a dose based on body size and a glucose solution is infused and the rate adjusted every 5 minutes based on a blood glucose reading to maintain the blood glucose stable at 90 mg/dl (normal level). Using glucose isotopes and the rate of the glucose infusion, we are then able to calculate how much glucose the liver is producing and how much glucose is being taken up into tissues. This provides a measure of insulin sensitivity. (NCT01289639)
Timeframe: 0-6 months

Interventionmg/minute/kg lean mass (Mean)
Arm 10.21
Arm 2-0.42

[back to top]

Change in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Concentration in Plasma From Baseline to 6 Months

The percent difference in hsCRP concentration geometric mean values from baseline to 6 months was calculated for each arm (NCT01301027)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionpercent difference in geometric mean (Geometric Mean)
Pioglitazone-29.0
Placebo-1.8

[back to top]

Change in High Molecular Weight Adiponectin (HMW-A) Concentration in Plasma From Baseline to 6 Months

The percent difference in HMW-A concentration geometric mean values from baseline to 6 months was calculated for each arm (NCT01301027)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionpercent difference in geometric mean (Geometric Mean)
Pioglitazone38.3
Placebo-3.4

[back to top]

Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) Concentration in Plasma From Baseline to 6 Months

The percent difference in TNF-α concentration geometric mean values from baseline to 6 months was calculated for each arm (NCT01301027)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionpercent difference in geometric mean (Geometric Mean)
Pioglitazone44.9
Placebo39.1

[back to top]

Change in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Concentration in Plasma From Baseline to 6 Months

The percent difference in IL-6 concentration geometric mean values from baseline to 6 months was calculated for each arm (NCT01301027)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionpercent difference in geometric mean (Geometric Mean)
Pioglitazone-12.3
Placebo-12.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 12).

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 12 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318070)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30mg QD-0.91
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.97
Pioglitazone 15 mg or 30 mg QD-0.19

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 8).

The change between the value of fasting plasma glucose collected at week 8 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318070)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30mg QD-17.1
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-21.3
Pioglitazone 15 mg or 30 mg QD-4.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 4).

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 4 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318070)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30mg QD-0.47
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.46
Pioglitazone 15 mg or 30 mg QD-0.10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 4).

The change between the value of fasting plasma glucose collected at week 4 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318070)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30mg QD-14.4
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-17.9
Pioglitazone 15 mg or 30 mg QD-3.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 2).

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 2 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318070)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30mg QD-0.22
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.22
Pioglitazone 15 mg or 30 mg QD-0.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 2).

The change between the value of fasting plasma glucose collected at week 2 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318070)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30mg QD-12.8
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-17.0
Pioglitazone 15 mg or 30 mg QD-3.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 8).

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 8 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318070)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30mg QD-0.76
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.81
Pioglitazone 15 mg or 30 mg QD-0.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Week 12).

The change between the value of fasting plasma glucose collected at week 12 or final visit and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318070)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30mg QD-14.9
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-18.9
Pioglitazone 15 mg or 30 mg QD-2.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Blood Glucose Measured by the Meal Tolerance Test (Week 12).

The change between the value of blood glucose measured by the meal tolerance test collected at week 12 or final visit and blood glucose measured by the meal tolerance test collected at baseline. Meal tolerance test measures blood glucose through blood samples drawn before a meal and 2 hours after the start of the meal. (NCT01318070)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30mg QD58.3
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD49.4
Pioglitazone 15 mg or 30 mg QD70.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Blood Glucose Measured by the Meal Tolerance Test (Week 24).

The change between the value of blood glucose measured by the meal tolerance test collected at week 24 and blood glucose measured by the meal tolerance test collected at baseline. Meal tolerance test measures blood glucose through blood samples drawn before a meal and at 2 hours after the start of the meal. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD55.9
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD47.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Blood Glucose Measured by the Meal Tolerance Test (Week 52).

The change between the value of blood glucose measured by the meal tolerance test collected at week 52 or final visit and blood glucose measured by the meal tolerance test collected at baseline. Meal tolerance test measures blood glucose through blood samples drawn before a meal and at 2 hours after the start of the meal. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD59.1
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD57.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Final Visit).

The change between the value of fasting blood glucose collected at week 52 or final visit and baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Final Visit (up to Week 52).

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-11.4
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-11.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 48).

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 48 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 48.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.73
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.76

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 52).

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 52 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.77
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 16).

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 16 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.86
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.92

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 12).

The change between the value of fasting blood glucose collected at week 12 and baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-13.4
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-16.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 16).

The change between the value of fasting blood glucose collected at week 6 and baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-11.9
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-13.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 24).

The change between the value of fasting blood glucose collected at week 24 and baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-10.0
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-10.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Blood Glucose Measured by the Meal Tolerance Test (Final Visit).

The change between the value of blood glucose measured by the meal tolerance test collected at week 52 or end of study and blood glucose measured by the meal tolerance test collected at baseline. Meal tolerance test measures blood glucose through blood samples drawn before a meal and at 2 hours after the start of the meal. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Final Visit (up to Week 52).

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD59.8
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD56.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 44).

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 44 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 44.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.70
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.74

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) are adverse events with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug and within 30 days after receiving the last dose of study drug. A TEAE may also be a pre-treatment adverse event or a concurrent medical condition diagnosed prior to the date of first dose of study drug that increases in severity after the start of dosing. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: 52 Weeks.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of Participants with Serious Adverse EventNumber of Participants with Other Adverse Event
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD14143
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD11146

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 8).

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 8 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.68
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.73

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 40).

The change between the value of fasting blood glucose collected at week 40 and baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 40.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-9.5
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-10.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 28).

The change between the value of fasting blood glucose collected at week 28 and baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 28.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-5.6
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-9.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 32).

The change between the value of fasting blood glucose collected at week 32 and baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 32.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-7.9
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-10.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 48).

The change between the value of fasting blood glucose collected at week 48 and baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 48.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-12.2
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-14.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 52).

The change between the value of fasting blood glucose collected at week 52 and baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-12.8
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-13.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 8).

The change between the value of fasting blood glucose collected at week 8 and baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-15.5
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-18.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Final Visit).

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 52 or final visit and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Final Visit (up to Week 52).

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.65
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.65

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 12).

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 12 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.81
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.88

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 20).

The change between the value of fasting blood glucose collected at week 20 and baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-10.1
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-13.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 20).

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 20 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 20.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.84
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.90

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 24).

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 24 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.78
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.82

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 28).

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 28 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 28.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.75
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.76

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 32).

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 32 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 32.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.72
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.72

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 36).

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 36 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.67
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.69

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Week 40).

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 40 and glycosylated hemoglobin collected at baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 40.

Interventionpercentage of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.65
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-0.66

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 44).

The change between the value of fasting blood glucose collected at week 44 and baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 44.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-10.4
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-10.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (Week 36).

The change between the value of fasting blood glucose collected at week 36 and baseline. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-7.1
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD-11.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Blood Glucose Measured by the Meal Tolerance Test (Week 12).

The change between the value of blood glucose measured by the meal tolerance test collected at week 12 and blood glucose measured by the meal tolerance test collected at baseline. Meal tolerance test measures blood glucose through blood samples drawn before a meal and at 2 hours after the start of the meal. (NCT01318122)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD58.3
Alogliptin 25 mg QD and Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg QD49.5

[back to top]

Difference of Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) of Atherosclerotic Plaque in Carotid Artery by PET CT

(NCT01341730)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionstandardized uptake value (SUV) (Mean)
Atorvastatin 20 mg-0.06
Atorvastatin 20 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg-0.10

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Pathologic Response

Complete pathologic response was defined as no viable residual tumor cells. Acellular residual mucin pools also considered a pathologic complete response. (NCT01342770)
Timeframe: Up to the time of surgery, after 42 days of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponseNo Response
Treatment (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride)15

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events Graded According to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0

To evaluate the adverse events profile, the maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be recorded for each participant and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine the overall patterns. The number and severity of adverse events (both regardless of attribution as well as those that are at least possibly, probably, or definitely related) will be tabulated and summarized. (NCT01342770)
Timeframe: Up to the time of surgery, after 42 days of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No Adverse EventsGrade 1 Adverse Events
Treatment (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride)32

[back to top]

Post-intervention SUV of PET Scan

The pre- and post-intervention SUV will be summarized using descriptive statistics and simple graphical plots. (NCT01342770)
Timeframe: Time of surgery, after 42 days of treatment

InterventionSUV (Median)
Treatment (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride)12.2

[back to top]

Percent Change in SUVmax From the PET Scan

The percent change from pre to post-intervention in SUV max values will be summarized using descriptive statistics and simple graphical plots. (NCT01342770)
Timeframe: Baseline to the time of surgery, after 42 days of treatment

InterventionPercent change in tumor SUV max values (Median)
Treatment (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride)0

[back to top]

Percent Change in PPARy

Changes in the expression levels from baseline (prior to intervention) to post intervention (resected tumor sample) will be plotted graphically. (NCT01342770)
Timeframe: Baseline to the time of surgery, after 42 days of treatment

InterventionPercent change in PPARy measurements (Median)
Treatment (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride)183.4

[back to top]

Percent Change in p21

Changes in the expression levels from baseline (prior to intervention) to post intervention (resected tumor sample) will be plotted graphically. (NCT01342770)
Timeframe: Baseline to the time of surgery, after 42 days of treatment

InterventionPercent change in p21 measurements (Median)
Treatment (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride)-5

[back to top]

Percent Change in MUC1

Changes in the expression levels from baseline (prior to intervention) to post intervention (resected tumor sample) will be plotted graphically. (NCT01342770)
Timeframe: Baseline to the time of surgery, after 42 days of treatment

InterventionPercent change in MUC1 measurements (Median)
Treatment (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride)0

[back to top]

Percent Change in Ki-67 by Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Changes in the expression levels of Ki-67 will be plotted graphically, and percent change in expression levels will be formally assessed using the paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed rank test, if the assumptions of the t-test (i.e. normality) are not met. (NCT01342770)
Timeframe: Baseline and at the time of surgery, after 42 days of treatment

InterventionPercent change in Ki-67 measurements (Median)
Treatment (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride)-20.0

[back to top]

Percent Change in Cyclin D1

Changes in the expression levels from baseline (prior to intervention) to post intervention (resected tumor sample) will be plotted graphically. (NCT01342770)
Timeframe: Baseline to the time of surgery, after 42 days of treatment

InterventionPercent change in Cyclin D1 measurements (Median)
Treatment (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride)-69

[back to top]

Pre-intervention SUV of PET Scan

The pre- and post-intervention SUV will be summarized using descriptive statistics and simple graphical plots. (NCT01342770)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionSUV (Median)
Treatment (Pioglitazone Hydrochloride)13.0

[back to top]

Pioglitazone Area Under Curve Estimates by Treatment Group and Route of Administration

Pioglitazone concentration as the total area under curve divided by the number of days receiving the drug in subjects who took the drug by mouth versus by naso-gastric tube (NCT01352182)
Timeframe: five days

Interventionng*h/ml (Mean)
Pioglitazone Hydrochloride by Mouth5363
Pioglitazone Hydrochloride by Nasogastric Tube1052

[back to top]

Safety Labs - Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)

ALT levels in blood from subject on the final day of enrollment (NCT01352182)
Timeframe: Final day of study

InterventionU/L (Median)
Pioglitazone Hydrochloride21.5
Normal Standard Care24.5

[back to top]

Safety Labs - Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)

BUN levels in blood from subject on the final day of enrollment (NCT01352182)
Timeframe: Final day of study

Interventionmg/dl (Median)
Pioglitazone Hydrochloride7.5
Normal Standard Care10

[back to top]

Safety Labs - Creatinine

Creatinine levels in blood from subject on the final day of enrollment (NCT01352182)
Timeframe: Final day of study

Interventionmg/dl (Median)
Pioglitazone Hydrochloride0.72
Normal Standard Care0.415

[back to top]

Effect of Pioglitazone Area Under the Curve on Changes in IL-6

We examined the effect of pioglitazone Area under the curve on IL-6 in patients receiving pioglitazone only. (Control subjects did not receive pioglitazone). The pharmacokinetic endpoint was area under the curve (AUC) total/days of pioglitazone administration (NCT01352182)
Timeframe: Evaluation of inflammatory biomarkers will be obtained prior to dosing for the first five days of the study

Interventionng/ml (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone Hydrochloride-1.4425
Normal Standard CareNA

[back to top]

Evaluate the Safety Profile of Pioglitazone in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock as the Number of Hypoglycemic Events

The number of hypoglycemic events in pioglitazone vs standard care. Hypoglycemia was defined as blood glucose level that remains <40mg/dl despite dextrose bolus treatment. (NCT01352182)
Timeframe: Assessement over five days

Interventionevents (Number)
Pioglitazone Hydrochloride0
Normal Standard Care0

[back to top]

Analgesic Responses Using the Cold Pressor Test

Latency to withdraw hand from cold water during the cold pressor test. (NCT01395784)
Timeframe: Measured during the lab session conducted at the end of each maintenance period

Interventionseconds (Mean)
PlaceboPIO 15PIO 45
All Participants1107175

[back to top]

"Subjective Ratings of Good Drug Effect"

Visual analog scale ratings (0-100 mm scale, 0=Not at all, 100=Extremely) (NCT01395784)
Timeframe: Measured during the lab session conducted at the end of each maintenance period

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PlaceboPIO 15PIO 45
All Participants373535

[back to top]

Drug's Break Point

Number of operant responses (mouse clicks) participants were willing to provide in order to receive the drug under investigation (heroin or nicotine). The Breakpoint is the point at which participants stopped responding for the drug, i.e., the total number of clicks they were willing to provide in order to receive the drug. (NCT01395797)
Timeframe: Following 2 weeks of Pioglitazone (PIO) maintenance.

InterventionMouse clicks (Mean)
Placebo - Heroin1037
Pio Low Dose- Heroin1200
Pio High Dose - Heroin2014
Placebo - Nicotine568
Pio Low Dose- Nicotine722
Pio High Dose - Nicotine960

[back to top]

Measures of Subjective Drug Effects Most Commonly Indicative of Abuse Liability.

"Visual analog scale ratings of Liking reported by the participant will be the primary endpoint (0-100 mm, 0=Not at all, 100=Extremely)." (NCT01395797)
Timeframe: Following 2 weeks of Pioglitazone (PIO) maintenance.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo - Heroin24
Pio Low Dose- Heroin15
Pio High Dose - Heroin19
Placebo - Nicotine59
Pio Low Dose- Nicotine68
Pio High Dose - Nicotine62.5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat

Hepatic fat content was assessed via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prior to first dose administration and following 4 weeks of treatment. Percent change in hepatic fat fraction from baseline was calculated for each of the 9 liver regions separately and then these were averaged to calculate overall percent change from baseline for each participant. (NCT01431521)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
MK-4074-35.73
Pioglitazone-18.04
Placebo8.63

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT)

Hepatic steatosis is not uncommonly associated with mild elevations in serum transaminases, specifically ALT, and these elevations may be a marker of more advanced hepatic disease. Serum transaminases were monitored at baseline and once weekly for the duration of the study to permit a better understanding of the time course of potential improvement in hepatic inflammation during the course of this short study. (NCT01431521)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
MK-4074-9.82
Pioglitazone-20.21
Placebo-3.47

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline Aspartate Transaminase (AST)

Hepatic steatosis is not uncommonly associated with mild elevations in serum transaminases, including AST, and these elevations may be a marker of more advanced hepatic disease. Serum transaminases were monitored at baseline and once weekly for the duration of the study to permit a better understanding of the time course of potential improvement in hepatic inflammation during the course of this short study. (NCT01431521)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
MK-4074-6.74
Pioglitazone-13.95
Placebo-3.28

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. (NCT01431521)
Timeframe: Up to 4 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
MK-40740
Pioglitazone0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing One or More Adverse Events (AE)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. (NCT01431521)
Timeframe: Up to 10 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
MK-40744
Pioglitazone4
Placebo5

[back to top]

Plasma Adipocytokines

the effect of the intervention on plasma adiponectin levels. (NCT01432405)
Timeframe: one year

Interventionmicrogram per ml (Mean)
Pioglitazone and Exenatide23.2
Pioglitazone15.8

[back to top]

Hepatic Fat

The effect of exenatide and pioglitazone on liver fat content after one year of treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. (NCT01432405)
Timeframe: one year

Interventionpercent of liver fat (Mean)
Pioglitazone and Exenatide4.7
Pioglitazone6.5

[back to top]

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at Baseline

The HDRS-21 was used to screen for unremitted depression. The HDRS-21 is scored on a scale from 0 to 21, where 0 is the lowest level of depression severity and 21 is the highest level of depression severity. Unremitted depression is characterized by a score of ≥7. The HDRS-21 scores at baseline are shown in the data table below. (NCT01559857)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pio - IS15.22
Placebo - IS13.67
Pio - IR19.22
Placebo - IR13.25

[back to top]

Fasting Insulin Measurements at Baseline

The fasting plasma insulin measurements taken at baseline are shown in the data table below. (NCT01559857)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionuIU/mL (Mean)
Pio - IS10.61
Placebo - IS9.18
Pio - IR13.98
Placebo - IR14.12

[back to top]

Change in HDRS-21: From Baseline to 12 Weeks

The HDRS-21 was administered at baseline and at the end of 12 weeks, and the mean difference between the two time points was calculated. The HDRS-21 is scored on a scale from 0 to 21, where 0 is the lowest level of depression severity and 21 is the highest level of depression severity. (NCT01559857)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pio - IS-4.45
Placebo - IS-3.57
Pio - IR-1.71
Placebo - IR-3.57

[back to top]

Change in E to A Ratio

The E to A ratio is a marker of the function of the left ventricle of the heart. It represents the ratio of peak velocity flow in early diastole (the E wave) to peak velocity flow in late diastole caused by the atrial contraction (the A wave) This is measured using ultrasound-based cardiac imaging. In a healthy heart the E velocity is greater than the A velocity. (NCT01588470)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6-months Post Treatment

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Baseline1.04
E to A Ratio After Pioglitazone Treatment1.25

[back to top]

Myocardial Glucose Uptake

Measurement of change in myocardial glucose uptake from baseline to 6 months of treatment with pitoglitazone (NCT01588470)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6-months Post Treatment

InterventionuM/min/g (Mean)
Baseline0.24
Pioglitazone0.42

[back to top]

Change in Hemoglobin A1c

Change in hemoglobin A1c levels measured at 6 months (NCT01588470)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6-months Post Treatment

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Baseline6.7
Pioglitazone5.6

[back to top]

Comparison of Changes in Lipid Profiles With Pioglitazone and Metformin

"Response rate was defined by ≥10% decrease of FSG or/and ≥1% decrease of HbA1c from the baseline values after 3 months treatment.48 responded to pioglitazone and 32 responded to metformin.~Analysis 1:Total Cholesterol(TC) Analysis 2:Triglyceride(TG) Analysis 3:High Density Lipoprotein(HDL) Analysis 4:Low Density Lipoprotein(LDL)" (NCT01589445)
Timeframe: 3 months for each drug

,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Baseline TC3rd month TCBaseline TG3rd month TGBaseline HDL3rd month HDLBaseline LDL3rd month LDL
Metformin (002 Group)193.0177.0166.0175.034.434.7125.6112.0
Pioglitazone (001 Group)182.01781831953333.2112.8105.5

[back to top]

Comparison of Changes in Insulin Levels (HOMA IR,QUICKI) With Pioglitazone and Metformin

"Response rate was defined by ≥10% decrease of FSG or/and ≥1% decrease of HbA1c from the baseline values after 3 months treatment.48 responded to pioglitazone and 32 responded to metformin.~Analysis 1: Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance(HOMA IR) Analysis 2: Quantitative Insulin sensitivity Check Index(QUICKI)" (NCT01589445)
Timeframe: 3 months for each drug

,
InterventionScore on a scale ( SI unit) (Mean)
Baseline QUICKI3rd month QUICKIBaseline HOMA IR3rd month HOMA IR
Metformin ( 002 Group)0.570.543.74.3
Pioglitazone (001 Group)0.520.595.12.9

[back to top]

Comparison of Changes in HOMA Percent B and HOMA Percent S With Pioglitazone and Metformin

"Response rate was defined by ≥10% decrease of FSG or/and ≥1% decrease of HbA1c from the baseline values after 3 months treatment.48 responded to pioglitazone and 32 responded to metformin.~Analysis 1: Homeostatic Model Assessment of Beta cell function(HOMA percent B) Analysis 2: Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Sensitivity (Homa percent S)" (NCT01589445)
Timeframe: 3 months for each drug

,
Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Baseline HOMA percent beta cells function3rd month HOMA percent beta cells functionBaseline HOMA percent sensitivity3rd month HOMA percent sensitivity
Metformin ( 002 Group)109.3116.076.267.2
Pioglitazone (001 Group)118.9132.351.169.3

[back to top]

Comparison of Changes in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)With Pioglitazone and Metformin

Response rate was defined by ≥10% decrease of FSG or/and ≥1% decrease of HbA1c from the baseline values after 3 months treatment.48 responded to pioglitazone and 32 responded to metformin. (NCT01589445)
Timeframe: 3 months for each drug

,
Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Baseline HbA1c3rd month HbA1c
Metformin ( 002 Group)7.87.0
Pioglitazone (001 Group)7.36.7

[back to top]

Comparison of Changes in Fasting Serum Insulin (FSI)With Pioglitazone and Metformin

Response rate was defined by ≥10% decrease of FSG or/and ≥1% decrease of HbA1c from the baseline values after 3 months treatment.48 responded to pioglitazone and 32 responded to metformin. (NCT01589445)
Timeframe: 3 months for each drug

,
InterventionμU/ml (Mean)
Baseline FSI3rd month FSI
Metformin ( 002 Group)13.013.9
Pioglitazone (001 Group)16.212.3

[back to top]

Comparison of Changes in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG)With Pioglitazone and Metformin

Response rate was defined by ≥10% decrease of FSG or/and ≥1% decrease of HbA1c from the baseline values after 3 months treatment.48 responded to pioglitazone and 32 responded to metformin. (NCT01589445)
Timeframe: 3 months for each drug

,
Interventionmmol/l (Mean)
Baseline FSG3rd Month FSG
Metformin ( 002 Group)6.26.5
Pioglitazone (001 Group)6.95.4

[back to top]

Change in Insulin Sensitivity From Baseline to Week 12 Post-treatment With Insulin Sensitizing Agent

Change in insulin sensitivity measured by 2 hour euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp from baseline to week 12 post treatment with metformin or pioglitazone (NCT01612858)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionmg/kg lean body mass/min (Mean)
Metformin-0.25
Pioglitazone-0.96

[back to top]

Change in Hepatic Fat From Baseline to Week 12 Post-treatment With an Insulin Sensitizing Agent

Change in hepatic fat was measured after 12 weeks of treatment with metformin or pioglitazone using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NCT01612858)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of hepatic fat (Mean)
Metformin2.30
Pioglitazone-2.56

[back to top]

Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Anxiety symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 28 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone4.884
Placebo1.1125

[back to top]

Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Anxiety symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 3 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone5.884
Placebo0.5706

[back to top]

Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Anxiety symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 31 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone7.2173
Placebo1.8206

[back to top]

Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Anxiety symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 7 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone3.2897
Placebo2.0706

[back to top]

Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Alcohol craving was measured using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS). The PACS is a five-item self-administered instrument for assessing alcohol craving over the course of the past week. The score ranges from 0 (lowest craving value) to 30 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 17 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone4.7503
Placebo4.0622

[back to top]

Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Depression symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 10 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone4.7167
Placebo0.8687

[back to top]

Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Depression symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 14 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone4.6366
Placebo0.5912

[back to top]

Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Depression symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 17 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone6.3032
Placebo0.8687

[back to top]

Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Depression symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 21 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone5.1366
Placebo1.4937

[back to top]

Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Depression symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 24 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone7.1366
Placebo1.1187

[back to top]

Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Depression symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 28 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone6.4699
Placebo1.1228

[back to top]

Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Depression symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 3 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone5.6366
Placebo0.9937

[back to top]

Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Depression symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 31 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone8.6366
Placebo0.8687

[back to top]

Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Depression symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 7 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone4.9065
Placebo0.9937

[back to top]

Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Alcohol craving was measured using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS). The PACS is a five-item self-administered instrument for assessing alcohol craving over the course of the past week. The score ranges from 0 (lowest craving value) to 30 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 1 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone7.7503
Placebo7.8122

[back to top]

Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Alcohol craving was measured using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS). The PACS is a five-item self-administered instrument for assessing alcohol craving over the course of the past week. The score ranges from 0 (lowest craving value) to 30 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 10 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone6.0837
Placebo3.9372

[back to top]

Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Alcohol craving was measured using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS). The PACS is a five-item self-administered instrument for assessing alcohol craving over the course of the past week. The score ranges from 0 (lowest craving value) to 30 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 14 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone4.7503
Placebo4.1872

[back to top]

Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Alcohol craving was measured using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS). The PACS is a five-item self-administered instrument for assessing alcohol craving over the course of the past week. The score ranges from 0 (lowest craving value) to 30 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 21 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone4.417
Placebo3.8122

[back to top]

Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Alcohol craving was measured using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS). The PACS is a five-item self-administered instrument for assessing alcohol craving over the course of the past week. The score ranges from 0 (lowest craving value) to 30 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 24 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone5.917
Placebo2.3122

[back to top]

Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Alcohol craving was measured using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS). The PACS is a five-item self-administered instrument for assessing alcohol craving over the course of the past week. The score ranges from 0 (lowest craving value) to 30 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 28 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone6.417
Placebo2.6872

[back to top]

Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Alcohol craving was measured using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS). The PACS is a five-item self-administered instrument for assessing alcohol craving over the course of the past week. The score ranges from 0 (lowest craving value) to 30 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 3 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone8.417
Placebo5.9372

[back to top]

Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Alcohol craving was measured using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS). The PACS is a five-item self-administered instrument for assessing alcohol craving over the course of the past week. The score ranges from 0 (lowest craving value) to 30 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 31 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone4.5837
Placebo2.8122

[back to top]

Spontaneous Alcohol Craving Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Alcohol craving was measured using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS). The PACS is a five-item self-administered instrument for assessing alcohol craving over the course of the past week. The score ranges from 0 (lowest craving value) to 30 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 7 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone7.0837
Placebo4.1872

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Lipopolysaccharide Challenge

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 4 hours after the subject received an intravenous bolus of lipopolysaccharide, which occurred on Day 25 or Day 32 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone12.1285
Placebo10.5447

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Stress Script

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 15 minutes prior to the beginning of script presentation, which occurred on Day 21, 22, or 23 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone10
Placebo11.25

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Stress Script

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after the beginning of script presentation, which occurred on Day 21, 22, or 23 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone10
Placebo12.125

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Lipopolysaccharide Challenge

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 6 hours after the subject received an intravenous bolus of lipopolysaccharide, which occurred on Day 25 or Day 32 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone9.9285
Placebo9.6697

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Lipopolysaccharide Challenge

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 5 hours after the subject received an intravenous bolus of lipopolysaccharide, which occurred on Day 25 or Day 32 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone12.1285
Placebo10.9197

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Alcohol Cue Script

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after the beginning of script presentation, which occurred on Day 21, 22, or 23 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone17.4172
Placebo9.8121

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Lipopolysaccharide Challenge

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 3 hours after the subject received an intravenous bolus of lipopolysaccharide, which occurred on Day 25 or Day 32 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone9.5285
Placebo10.5447

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Lipopolysaccharide Challenge

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 2 hours after the subject received an intravenous bolus of lipopolysaccharide, which occurred on Day 25 or Day 32 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone11.9285
Placebo9.0447

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Lipopolysaccharide Challenge

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 15 minutes prior to the subject receiving an intravenous bolus of lipopolysaccharide, which occurred on Day 25 or Day 32 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone11.1285
Placebo10.7947

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Lipopolysaccharide Challenge

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 1 hour after the subject received an intravenous bolus of lipopolysaccharide, which occurred on Day 25 or Day 32 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone9.5285
Placebo9.1697

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Alcohol Cue Script

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 90 minutes after the beginning of script presentation, which occurred on Day 21, 22, or 23 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone19.2505
Placebo8.9371

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Alcohol Cue Script

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 75 minutes after the beginning of script presentation, which occurred on Day 21, 22, or 23 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone15.2505
Placebo9.6871

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Alcohol Cue Script

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 60 minutes after the beginning of script presentation, which occurred on Day 21, 22, or 23 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone16.4172
Placebo8.9371

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Alcohol Cue Script

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 5 minutes after the beginning of script presentation, which occurred on Day 21, 22, or 23 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone20.5838
Placebo9.6871

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Alcohol Cue Script

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 45 minutes after the beginning of script presentation, which occurred on Day 21, 22, or 23 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone18.0838
Placebo8.4371

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Alcohol Cue Script

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after the beginning of script presentation, which occurred on Day 21, 22, or 23 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone19.0838
Placebo10.5621

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Alcohol Cue Script

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 15 minutes prior to the beginning of script presentation, which occurred on Day 21, 22, or 23 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone13.7505
Placebo8.1871

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Stress Script

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 45 minutes after the beginning of script presentation, which occurred on Day 21, 22, or 23 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone10.1667
Placebo9.125

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Stress Script

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 5 minutes after the beginning of script presentation, which occurred on Day 21, 22, or 23 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone10.3333
Placebo11.875

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Stress Script

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 60 minutes after the beginning of script presentation, which occurred on Day 21, 22, or 23 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone10.1667
Placebo9.25

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Stress Script

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 75 minutes after the beginning of script presentation, which occurred on Day 21, 22, or 23 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone10.1667
Placebo9.5

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Stress Script

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 90 minutes after the beginning of script presentation, which occurred on Day 21, 22, or 23 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone10.6667
Placebo9.625

[back to top]

Alcohol Craving in Response to the Stress Script

Alcohol craving was measured using the Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ is an 8-item self-administered instrument that assesses craving for alcohol among alcohol users in the current context (i.e., right now). The score ranges from 8 (lowest craving value) to 56 (highest craving value). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after the beginning of script presentation, which occurred on Day 21, 22, or 23 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone10
Placebo11.375

[back to top]

Depression Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Depression symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 1 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone6.3661
Placebo3.2956

[back to top]

Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Anxiety symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 1 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone2.8502
Placebo4.5791

[back to top]

Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Anxiety symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 10 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone3.3403
Placebo1.1956

[back to top]

Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Anxiety symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 14 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone4.2173
Placebo1.2136

[back to top]

Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Anxiety symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 17 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone5.0507
Placebo1.0706

[back to top]

Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Anxiety symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 21 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone5.0507
Placebo1.6956

[back to top]

Anxiety Symptom Ratings Measured Bi-weekly During the Treatment Period

Anxiety symptoms were measured using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). The CPRS is an 18-item interview-based instrument for assessing depression and anxiety. There are two 10-item subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). Each subscale ranges from 0 (lowest symptom severity) to 60 (highest symptom severity). (NCT01631630)
Timeframe: Day 24 of the treatment period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone3.884
Placebo0.6956

[back to top]

Stage of Bladder Cancer (10 Year Analysis)

(NCT01637935)
Timeframe: January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2012

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PUNLMPIn situLocalRegionalDistantUndetermined
Pioglitazone Exposed Group15040423
Pioglitazone Unexposed Group14938633

[back to top]

Incident Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer (10-year Analysis)

Incident bladder cancers were identified from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2012. (NCT01637935)
Timeframe: January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2012

Interventionevents per 100,000 person years (Number)
Pioglitazone Exposed Group89.8
Pioglitazone Unexposed Group75.9

[back to top]

Incident Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer by Time Since Starting Pioglitazone (10 Year Analysis)

(NCT01637935)
Timeframe: January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2012

,
Interventionevents per 100,000 person years (Number)
Less than 4.5 years4.5 -8.5 yearsMore than 8.0 years
Pioglitazone Exposed Group68.2111.6125.8
Pioglitazone Unexposed GroupNANANA

[back to top]

Incident Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer by Duration of Pioglitazone Therapy (10 Year Analysis)

(NCT01637935)
Timeframe: January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2012

,
Interventionevents per 100,000 person years (Number)
Less than 1.5 years1.5 - 4.0 yearsMore than 4 years
Pioglitazone Exposed Group67.588.4113.7
Pioglitazone Unexposed GroupNANANA

[back to top]

Incident Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer by Cumulative Dose of Pioglitazone (10 Year Analysis)

(NCT01637935)
Timeframe: January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2012

,
Interventionevents per 100,000 person years (Number)
1 - 14000 mg14001 - 40000 mg>40000 mg
Pioglitazone Exposed Group69.196.9101.4
Pioglitazone Unexposed GroupNANANA

[back to top]

Tumor Response (Change)

Response is measured by change in Tumor size (cm) (NCT01655719)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

Interventioncm (Number)
Baseline24 weeks
Pioglitazone Treatment6.03.9

[back to top]

Change in Serum Thyroglobulin

Determine if pioglitazone decreases serum thyroglobulin in patients with follicular-patterned thyroid carcinomas that contain the PAX8-PPARgamma fusion gene. (NCT01655719)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

Interventionng/mL (Number)
Baseline24 weeks
Pioglitazone Treatment197449.4

[back to top]

Toxicity

Toxicities experienced by patients with PAX8-PPARgamma fusion gene-positive follicular-patterned thyroid carcinomas treated with pioglitazone are indicated by presence of Serious Adverse Events (that show relatedness). (NCT01655719)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionserious adverse events (Number)
Pioglitazone Treatment0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum AST at Month 4

The percent change between the serum AST value collected at Month 4 or final visit relative to baseline. (NCT01703260)
Timeframe: Month 4

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Roflumilast + Pioglitazone-41.31
Roflumilast Only-43.20
Pioglitazone Only-17.56

[back to top]

Amount of Serum Alanine Transaminase (ALT) at Baseline

(NCT01703260)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventioninternational units per liter (IU/L) (Mean)
Roflumilast + Pioglitazone101.7
Roflumilast Only83.4
Pioglitazone Only118.8

[back to top]

Amount of Serum Aspartate Transaminase (AST) at Baseline

(NCT01703260)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Roflumilast + Pioglitazone64.0
Roflumilast Only44.9
Pioglitazone Only88.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum ALT at Month 4

The percent change between the serum ALT value collected at Month 4 or final visit relative to baseline. (NCT01703260)
Timeframe: Month 4

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Roflumilast + Pioglitazone-53.89
Roflumilast Only-56.22
Pioglitazone Only-28.86

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Liver Fat Content at Month 4

Liver fat content was quantitatively measured by evaluating the percentage of PDFF from an abdominal MRI. On the basis of Couinaud classification (a classification used to describe functional liver anatomy), the liver was divided into 8 segments: caudate, left superolateral, left inferolateral, left superomedial (4a), left inferomedial (4b), right anteroinferior, right posteroinferior, right posterosuperior and right anterosuperior. (NCT01703260)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 4

,,
Interventionpercent change in PDFF (Mean)
Caudate; (n= 3, 3, 3)Left superolateral; (n= 6, 6, 6)Left inferolateral; (n= 3, 3, 3)Left superomedial: (n= 3, 3, 3)Left inferomedial: (n= 3, 3, 3)Right anteroinferior: (n= 3, 3, 3)Right posteroinferior: (n=3, 3, 3)Right posterosuperior: (n=3, 3, 3)Right anterosuperior: (n=3, 3, 3)
Pioglitazone Only-10.287-8.067-8.773-9.217-9.417-7.693-8.790-8.113-8.647
Roflumilast + Pioglitazone-18.787-15.170-14.290-14.687-14.107-13.990-18.073-17.717-16.127
Roflumilast Only-11.590-10.287-10.077-11.177-10.977-10.260-9.250-9.797-9.803

[back to top]

Liver Fat Content at Baseline

Liver fat content was quantitatively measured by evaluating the percentage of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) from an abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). On the basis of Couinaud classification (a classification used to describe functional liver anatomy), the liver was divided into 8 segments: caudate, left superolateral, left inferolateral, left superomedial (4a), left inferomedial (4b), right anteroinferior, right posteroinferior, right posterosuperior and right anterosuperior. (NCT01703260)
Timeframe: Baseline

,,
Interventionpercentage of PDFF (Mean)
Caudate; (n= 6, 7, 6)Left superolateral; (n= 6, 6, 6)Left inferolateral; (n= 6, 7, 6)Left superomedial: (n= 6, 7, 6)Left inferomedial: (n= 6, 6, 6)Right anteroinferior: (n= 6, 7, 6)Right posteroinferior: (n= 6, 7, 6)Right posterosuperior: (n= 6, 7, 6)Right anterosuperior: (n=6, 7, 6)
Pioglitazone Only20.11717.27819.15320.10021.53020.74220.07019.94321.527
Roflumilast + Pioglitazone22.23319.48522.38522.11521.55322.47823.71023.28223.630
Roflumilast Only19.10717.81319.74720.42618.97719.99418.80418.87019.786

[back to top]

Change in Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-C30) Total Score

Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-C30) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Total scores can range from 0 to 84 with higher scores indicating a higher severity of depressive symptoms (NCT01717040)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pioglitazone31.4
Placebo24.3

[back to top]

Matsuda Index (Measure of Insulin Sensitivity)

Insulin sensitivity (glucose tolerance) will be assessed using an oral 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) after an overnight fast. Blood samples will be collected at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after glucose administration to measure serum glucose and insulin. Insulin sensitivity was calculated using the Matsuda insulin sensitivity index [10,000/ √(glucose 0' x insulin 0') X (mean glucose OGTT x mean insulin OGTT)]. A higher value denotes increased insulin sensitivity. (NCT01748994)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline in Matsuda Index at 16 weeks

Interventionindex (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.39
Drug0.80

[back to top]

Visceral Adipose Tissue (Percentage of Total Abdominal Adipose Tissue)

The volume of fat tissue around the internal organs in the abdomen (visceral adipose tissue; VAT) and underneath the skin (subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue; scABD) will be determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the abdominal region. VAT:total abdominal AT (TAT) reflects the percentage of abdominal fat that is VAT and is calculated as VAT/(scABD AT + VAT). (NCT01748994)
Timeframe: Change from baseline in visceral fat at 16 weeks

Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.5
Drug-0.8

[back to top]

In Vivo Adipose Cell Formation (Adipogenesis)

Following the consumption of water labeled with the stable isotope deuterium (2H2O; heavy water), adipose tissue biopsies from the subcutaneous abdominal and femoral (thigh) depots will be collected. The 2H from the heavy water is enriched into the DNA of newly synthesized cells. Measures of DNA synthesis (obtained via gas chromatography and mass spectrometry analysis of 2H-enrichment) denote new adipose cell formation, or adipogenesis. The primary outcome is to assess the change (from baseline) in adipose cell formation rates (i.e. adipogenesis) in response to 16-weeks of pioglitazone versus the control group. (NCT01748994)
Timeframe: Change from baseline in adipogenesis at 16 weeks

,
Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
AbdominalFemoral
Drug1.82.1
Placebo-0.3-1.2

[back to top]

Lipid Accretion in the Liver (Intra-hepatic Lipid; IHL)

Lipid accretion in the liver cells will be measured using 1H-MRS of the liver. (NCT01748994)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline in intra-hepato-cellular lipid at 16 weeks

Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.7
Drug-2.0

[back to top]

Glucose to Insulin Ratio

"Glucose to insulin ratio will be measured by taking the ratio of fasting level of serum glucose and insulin.~We will obtain serum levels of fasting glucose and insulin every four weeks in all patients receiving pioglitazone" (NCT01838317)
Timeframe: Every 4 weeks while receiving treatment, up to 8 weeks

Interventionratio (Mean)
Pioglitazone and Chemotherapy Without Diabetes0.81
Pioglitazone and Chemotherapy - With Diabetes-6.23

[back to top]

Change in Weight

To describe changes in weight in patients with pancreas cancer receiving pioglitazone. (NCT01838317)
Timeframe: Baseline and every two weeks for 10 weeks, change between baseline and week 10 reported.

Interventionkg (Mean)
Pioglitazone and Chemotherapy Without Diabetes2.57
Pioglitazone and Chemotherapy - With Diabetes-4.01

[back to top]

Change in Serum Adiponectin Level

We will obtain serum levels of adiponectin at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment with pioglitazone. (NCT01838317)
Timeframe: Baseline and 8 weeks of treatment with pioglitazone

Interventionμg/ml (Mean)
Pioglitazone and Chemotherapy Without Diabetes34.47
Pioglitazone and Chemotherapy - With Diabetes29.77

[back to top]

the Mean Changes of FPG and PPG From Baseline Between Vildagliptin + Metformin and Pioglitazone + Metformin Groups

"After 16 weeks, to assess the effect of vildagliptin compared with the effect of pioglitazone on Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)~After 16 weeks, to assess the effect of vildagliptin compared with the effect of pioglitazone on Postprandial Glucose (PPG)" (NCT01882907)
Timeframe: 16 weeks , visit 5

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
FBG levels differencePPG levels difference
Pioglitazone-15.04-38.19
Vildagliptin-20.41-60.23

[back to top]

the Mean Changes of Body Weight From Baseline Between Vildagliptin + Metformin and Pioglitazone + Metformin Groups

(NCT01882907)
Timeframe: 16 weeks, visit 5

Interventionkg (Mean)
Vildagliptin-0.07
Pioglitazone0.69

[back to top]

Non-inferiority of HbA1C Change From Baseline in Vildagliptin + Metformin Group Compared With Pioglitazone + Metformin Group

(NCT01882907)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Intervention% (change of HbA1c) (Mean)
Vildagliptin-0.94
Pioglitazone-0.60

[back to top]

the Numbers of Participants With Adverse Events Between Vildagliptin + Metformin and Pioglitazone + Metformin Groups

(NCT01882907)
Timeframe: 16 weeks, visit 3,4,5

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of incidenceNumber of adverse events
Pioglitazone2537
Vildagliptin2748

[back to top]

the Mean Changes of Lipid Profiles From Baseline Between Vildagliptin + Metformin and Pioglitazone + Metformin Groups

The Mean Changes of Lipid Profiles(Triglyceride, Total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, Non-HDL cholesterol) From Baseline Between Vildagliptin + Metformin and Pioglitazone + Metformin Groups after 16weeks (NCT01882907)
Timeframe: 16 weeks, visit 5

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
TriglycerideTotal cholesterolLDLHDLNon-HDL cholesterol
Pioglitazone-4.799.605.383.695.79
Vildagliptin-9.22-6.45-6.03-0.34-8.39

[back to top]

the Mean Changes of Insulin, C-peptide, HOMA-IR, HOMA-beta From Baseline Between Vildagliptin + Metformin and Pioglitazone + Metformin Groups

(NCT01882907)
Timeframe: 16 weeks, visit 5

,
InterventionmcU/mL*mmol/L (Mean)
Insulin differenceC-peptide differenceHOMA-IR differenceHOMA-beta difference
Pioglitazone-8.21-0.24-3.33-24.26
Vildagliptin0.360.07-0.069.77

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions - 3 Levels (EuroQoL-5D-3L ) Index Score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Health State Score at Week 26

The EuroQoL-5D-3L questionnaire is a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument. The profile allows participants to rate their health state in 5 health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression using a 3-level scale of 1 to 3 (no problem, some problems, and extreme problems). These combinations of attributes are converted into a weighted health-state Index Score according to the United States population-based algorithm. Scores ranged from -0.11 to 1.0 where a score of 1.0 indicates perfect health. Overall health state score was self-reported using a VAS marked on a scale of 0 to 100 (0 indicates worst imaginable health state and 100 indicates best imaginable health state. LS means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) for actual measures and changes from baseline at endpoint using LOCF method: adjusting for treatment, stratification factors (region, HbA1c and SU/meglitin. (NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Endpoint EQ-5D-3L ScoreChange from Baseline VAS Health State Score
Insulin Glargine0.003.66
Insulin Peglispro0.012.29

[back to top]

Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG)

LS Means were calculated using MMRM analysis adjusting for baseline, treatment, stratification factor (region, HbA1c, LDL-C, and SU/meglitinide use), visit and treatment-by-visit interaction. (NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Weeks 0 and 26

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 0Week 26
Insulin Glargine161.19108.22
Insulin Peglispro159.53108.39

[back to top]

Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG)

LS means were calculated using MMRM analysis adjusting for baseline, treatment, stratification factor (region, HbA1c, LDL-C, and sulfonylurea [SU]/meglitinide use), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction. (NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Weeks 0 and 26

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 0Week 26
Insulin Glargine166.61110.32
Insulin Peglispro164.31103.85

[back to top]

Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ITSQ) Score

The Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire is a validated instrument containing 22 items that assessed treatment satisfaction for participants with diabetes on insulin. The questionnaire measures satisfaction from the following 5 domains: Inconvenience of Regimen, Lifestyle Flexibility, Glycemic Control, Hypoglycemic Control, and Insulin Delivery Device. Data presented are the transformed score on a scale of 0-100, where a higher score indicate better treatment satisfaction. LS means was achieved using a MMRM model for post-baseline measures with stratification factors (country, HbA1c, and SU/meglitinide use) treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit as fixed effects. ITSQ was assessed at Week 4 (baseline) and Week 26. (NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Week 4 and 26

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
ITSQ Wk4ITSQ Wk26
Insulin Glargine75.9478.29
Insulin Peglispro74.1378.73

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Total and Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Events (HE)

Percentage of participants with hypoglycemic events (total or nocturnal) to Week 26 based on BG Threshold 70mg/dL. (NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Nocturnal Hypoglycemia BG 70mg/dLTotal Hypoglycemia BG 70mg/dL
Insulin Glargine29.676.5
Insulin Peglispro26.677.1

[back to top]

Concentration of Triglycerides, Total Cholesterol, Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL-C), and High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 26

LS means were calculated using MMRM analysis adjusting for baseline, treatment, stratification factor (region, HbA1c, LDL-C, and SU/meglitinide use), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction. (NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Week 26

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Cholesterol Wk26HDL Wk26Triglycerides Wk26LDL Wk26
Insulin Glargine177.9052.99122.83101.07
Insulin Peglispro175.7651.64132.4397.95

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is a test that measures a participant's average blood glucose level over the past 2 to 3 months.LS means were calculated using a MMRM with baseline HbA1C measurement, stratification factors (country, HbA1c, LDL-C [< 100 mg/dL and ≥ 100 mg/dL], and SU/meglitinide use), treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects. (NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Peglispro-1.43
Insulin Glargine-1.22

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in Adult Low Blood Sugar Survey (LBSS) Scores

LBSS is a validated, participant-reported 33-item questionnaire with items rated on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0 = never and 5 - always. The LBSS measures behaviors to avoid hypoglycemia and its negative consequences (15 items) and worries about hypoglycemia and its negative consequences (18 items). Total score is the sum of all items (range 0 to 132). Higher total scores reflect greater fear of hypoglycemia. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country, treatment and metformin use as fixed effects and baseline score as a covariate. LBSS was assessed during screening visit (baseline) and again at Week 26. (NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Peglispro1.51
Insulin Glargine1.62

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Body Weight

LS Means were calculated using MMRM analysis adjusting for baseline, treatment, stratification factor (region, HbA1c, LDL-C, and SU/meglitinide use), visit and treatment-by-visit interaction. (NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

InterventionKilogram (kg) (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Peglispro1.06
Insulin Glargine1.57

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is a test that measures a participant's average blood glucose level over the past 2 to 3 months. Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis adjusting for treatment, stratification factors (region, sulfonylureas/meglitinide use, baseline Low-Density Lipoprotein [LDL-C], visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline HbA1c as fixed effects and participants as the random effect. P-value is from MMRM with terms for treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, stratification, and baseline HbA1C. (NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercent of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Peglispro-1.61
Insulin Glargine-1.36

[back to top]

Insulin Dose Per Kilogram (kg) of Body Weight

LS means were calculated using MMRM analysis adjusting for baseline, treatment, stratification factor (region, HbA1c, LDL-C, and SU/meglitinide), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction. (NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionunits per kg (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Peglispro0.26
Insulin Glargine0.26

[back to top]

Intra-Participant Variability of the Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG)

Intra-participant variability of Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG), which was measured by Self Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG), was assessed by the standard deviation of the FBG measurement at the Week 26 visit. LS means were calculated using a MMRM with baseline fasting blood glucose measurement, stratification factors (country, HbA1c, LDL-C [< 100 mg/dL and ≥ 100 mg/dL], and SU/meglitinide use), treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects. (NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Peglispro14.97
Insulin Glargine15.12

[back to top]

Percent Hemoglobin A1c at Week 26

HbA1c is a test that measures a participant's average blood glucose level over the past 2 to 3 months. LS means were calculated using a MMRM with baseline HbA1C measurement, stratification factors (country, HbA1c, LDL-C [< 100 mg/dL and ≥ 100 mg/dL], and SU/meglitinide use), treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects. (NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercent of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Peglispro6.92
Insulin Glargine7.17

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Steady-State of Basal Insulin Dose at 26 Weeks (Time to Steady State for Basal Insulin [Stable Maximum Dose])

(NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Insulin Peglispro96.9
Insulin Glargine97.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Detectable Anti-Insulin Peglispro Antibodies at Week 26

For participants with detectable anti-insulin peglispro antibody level, the percentage of participants with positive cross-react with endogenous insulin was summarized. (NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Insulin Peglispro24.6
Insulin Glargine32.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HbA1c ≤6.5%

Percentage of participants with HbA1c ≤6.5% at Week 26 were made using a logistic regression model for endpoint used last observation carried forward (LOCF) method including treatment, baseline HbA1c value. (NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Insulin Peglispro29.8
Insulin Glargine22.7

[back to top]

30-Day Adjusted Rate of Total and Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Events

Hypoglycemia Events (HE) occurs when blood glucose level ≤ 70 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (<3.9 micromoles per liter [mmol/L]). Nocturnal HE includes any total HE that occurred between bedtime and waking. Group mean rates of nocturnal hypoglycemia (per 30 days) are presented and were calculated from negative binomial regression models with treatment, baseline sulfonylurea/meglitinide use, baseline total hypoglycemia event rate, log (exposure/30 days) as the offset in the model. Group Mean is estimated by taking the inverse link function on individual participant covariates first and then averages over all participants. (NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26

,
InterventionNumber of events per participant per 30d (Mean)
Total HENocturnal HE
Insulin Glargine1.210.27
Insulin Peglispro1.280.19

[back to top]

9-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG)

LS means were calculated using MMRM analysis adjusting for baseline, treatment, stratification factor (region, HbA1c, LDL-C, and SU/meglitinide use), visit and treatment-by-visit interaction. The 9-point SMBG are measured at: Pre-morning meal, 2 hours(hr) post morning meal, pre-midday meal, 2 hr post midday meal, pre-evening meal, 2 hr post pre-evening meal, bedtime, 0300 hr, and pre-morning meal next day, and should be performed on 2 non-consecutive days. (NCT01894568)
Timeframe: Week 0 and Week 26

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Morning Pre-meal Wk0Morning Pre-meal Wk26Morning Post-meal Wk0Morning Post-meal Wk26Mid-day Pre-meal Wk0Mid-day Pre-meal Wk26Mid-day Post-meal Wk0Mid-day Post-meal Wk26Evening Pre-meal Wk0Evening Pre-meal Wk26Evening Post-meal Wk0Evening Post-meal Wk26Bed Time Wk0Bed Time Wk260300 Hours (Hrs) Wk00300 Hrs Wk26Pre-morning Meal Next Day Wk0Pre-morning Meal Next Day Wk26
Insulin Glargine162.83108.71233.37176.93166.68122.85226.11183.88172.83135.55219.54182.80197.68161.44162.13114.77159.96105.18
Insulin Peglispro160.19108.24237.19176.97169.24122.01224.22182.32176.49131.65219.45176.23198.64153.41158.82115.18156.28108.42

[back to top]

Ovulation Rate

(NCT01909141)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionpercentage of all cycles (Number)
Arm 1:Letrozole-pioglitazone -Metformin Group93
Arm 2: Clomiphene Citrate-pioglitazone-metformin108

[back to top]

Endometrial Thickness

(NCT01909141)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionmm (Mean)
Arm 1:Letrozole-pioglitazone -Metformin Group10.56
Arm 2: Clomiphene Citrate-pioglitazone-metformin9.68

[back to top]

Number of Follicles>18mm.

(NCT01909141)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionfollicles (Mean)
Arm 1:Letrozole-pioglitazone -Metformin Group1.44
Arm 2: Clomiphene Citrate-pioglitazone-metformin1.5

[back to top]

Pregnancy Rate

(NCT01909141)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm 1:Letrozole-pioglitazone -Metformin Group28
Arm 2: Clomiphene Citrate-pioglitazone-metformin24

[back to top]

Safety of Pioglitazone as Regards Serum Creatinine

serum creatinine was measured at the end of the study period (after 3 months) in both groups. (NCT01909141)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Arm 1:Letrozole-pioglitazone -Metformin Group0.62
Arm 2: Clomiphene Citrate-pioglitazone-metformin0.57

[back to top]

Change From Baseline for Cognitive Decline on Composite Score on the Cognitive Test Battery for Pioglitazone-treated Participants Versus Placebo-treated Participants in the High-risk Stratum

Composite scores derived from the test battery. Domains of Episodic Memory [California Verbal Learning Test-2nd Edition (CVLT-II), Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R)]; Executive Function [Trail Making Test (TMT) (Part B), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)-III Digit Span Test-backwards span]; Language [Multilingual Naming Test (MiNT), Semantic Fluency (animals), Lexical/phonemic fluency (F, A, and S in English; D, S, and F in German)]; and Attention [WAIS-III Digit Span Test-forward span, TMT (Part A)] used for composite score. 12 measures were derived from 8 neuropsychological tests. CVLT-II test involved 2 primary measures (short, long delay recall); BVMT-R had 2 measures (copy and recall); Digit Span and Trail both had 2 measures (forward and backward span and Parts A and B). There was 1 total score for each test: CDT, MINT, semantic and lexical fluency. Total score ranged from -1.222 to 1.707 at baseline, a higher composite score indicated better cognition. (NCT01931566)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 48

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
High Risk Placebo0.1841
High Risk Pioglitazone0.1687

[back to top]

Time to Diagnosis of MCI Due to AD for Pioglitazone-treated, High-risk, Non-Hispanic/Latino Caucasian Participants Versus Placebo-treated, High-risk, Non-Hispanic/Latino, Caucasian Participants

The event definition for MCI-AD was the time in days from the randomization date to the date of the first of two consecutive scheduled visits at which a participant was assessed with a diagnosis of MCI due to AD confirmed by adjudication committee. Here, the time to event was reported as the restricted mean survival time. The restricted mean survival time was defined as the area under the curve of the survival function up to the largest event time. (NCT01931566)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of study (approximately up to 5 years)

Interventiondays (Mean)
High Risk Placebo1238.67
High Risk Pioglitazone1261.24

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living - Prevention Instrument [ADCS ADL-PI]) Between Pioglitazone-treated and Placebo-treated Groups of the High-risk Stratum

The ADCS ADL-PI is a functional measure that was specifically designed for standardized administration over long duration clinical studies to prevent AD. The ADCS ADL-PI is a 20-item instrument that included 15 ADL questions, which were scored as 1 (with a lot of difficulty), 2 (with some difficulty), or 3 (as well as usually, with no difficulty), plus 5 vision, hearing, and mobility questions, which were scored from 0 (no) to 1 (yes). ADL Total ranged from 0 to 45, and lower scores indicated greater disability. (NCT01931566)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 48

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
High Risk Placebo0.1
High Risk Pioglitazone0.3

[back to top]

Time to Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment Due to Alzheimer's Disease (MCI-AD) for Placebo-treated, High-risk, Non-Hispanic/Latino Caucasian Participants Versus Placebo-treated, Low-risk, Non-Hispanic/Latino Caucasian Participants

The event definition for MCI-AD was the time in days from the randomization date to the date of the first of two consecutive scheduled visits at which a participant was assessed with a diagnosis of MCI due to AD confirmed by adjudication committee. Here, the time to event was reported as the restricted mean survival time. The restricted mean survival time was defined as the area under the curve of the survival function up to the largest event time. (NCT01931566)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of study (approximately up to 5 years)

Interventiondays (Mean)
Low Risk Placebo905.44
High Risk Placebo1238.67

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 24

The change between the value of fasting serum glucose collected at Week 24 and fasting serum glucose collected at baseline. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01972724)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg (Double-Blind)0.6727
Pioglitazone 30 mg (Double-Blind)-0.4278
Pioglitazone 30 mg (Open-Label)-0.4412

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24

The change from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) at Week 24. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01972724)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg (Double-Blind)-0.0003
Pioglitazone 30 mg (Double-Blind)-0.0030
Pioglitazone 30 mg (Open-Label)-0.0275

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG)

Reported data are changes in fasting blood glucose level from baseline at Month 1, 3, 6, 12 and final assessment (up to 12 months). (NCT01990300)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 1, 3, 6, 12 and final assessment (up to 12 Months)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Change in FBG at Month 1Change in FBG at Month 3Change in FBG at Month 6Change in FBG at Month 12Change in FBG at Final Assessment
Alogliptin/Pioglitazone-14.7-18.7-18.4-19.6-19.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience at Least One Adverse Events

(NCT01990300)
Timeframe: Up to 12 Months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Alogliptin/Pioglitazone206

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Reported data are changes in HbA1c from baseline at Month 1, 3, 6, 12 and final assessment (up to 12 months). (NCT01990300)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 1, 3, 6, 12 and final assessment (up to 12 Months)

InterventionPercent HbA1c (Mean)
Change in HbA1c at Month 1Change in HbA1c at Month 3Change in HbA1c at Month 6Change in HbA1c at Month 12Change in HbA1c at Final Assessment
Alogliptin/Pioglitazone-0.26-0.58-0.66-0.66-0.65

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Level) at Final Assessment Point

Changes from baseline in metabolic syndrome parameters at final assessment point (up to 3 years) were reported. The reported data on this outcome measure is in HDL cholesterol level as a one of metabolic syndrome parameters. (NCT02002975)
Timeframe: From Baseline and final assessment point (Up to 3 Years)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Pioglitazone3.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Body Weight) at Final Assessment Point

Changes from baseline in metabolic syndrome parameters at final assessment point (up to 3 years) were reported. The reported data on this outcome measure is in body weight as a one of metabolic syndrome parameters and for each gender (male/female). (NCT02002975)
Timeframe: From Baseline and final assessment point (Up to 3 Years)

Interventionkg (Mean)
Male ParticipantsFemale Participants
Pioglitazone1.271.53

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Met at Least One New Cerebral and Cardiovascular Events

Cerebral and cardiovascular events (Macroangiopathy) include the following: Sudden death, Cerebral infarction, Cerebral hemorrhage, Subarachnoid hemorrhage, Acute myocardial infarction, Angina pectoris requiring intervention or hospitalization for treatment, Cardiac failure requiring hospitalization for treatment, Atrial fibrillation, Aortic dissection. Reported data was frequency of participants who met at least one new cerebral and cardiovascular event throughout this study. (NCT02002975)
Timeframe: From Baseline, Up to 3 Years

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Pioglitazone1.01

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Waist Circumference) at Final Assessment Point

Changes from baseline in metabolic syndrome parameters at final assessment point (up to 3 years) were reported. The reported data on this outcome measure is in waist circumference as a one of metabolic syndrome parameters and for each gender (male/female). (NCT02002975)
Timeframe: From Baseline and final assessment point (Up to 3 Years)

Interventioncm (Mean)
Male ParticipantsFemale Participants
Pioglitazone0.510.54

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Total Cholesterol Level) at Final Assessment Point

Changes from baseline in metabolic syndrome parameters at final assessment point (up to 3 years) were reported. The reported data on this outcome measure is in total cholesterol level as a one of metabolic syndrome parameters. (NCT02002975)
Timeframe: From Baseline and final assessment point (Up to 3 Years)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Pioglitazone-9.0

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Diastolic Blood Pressure) at Final Assessment Point

Changes from baseline in metabolic syndrome parameters at final assessment point (up to 3 years) were reported. The reported data on this outcome measure is in diastolic blood pressure as a one of metabolic syndrome parameters. (NCT02002975)
Timeframe: From Baseline and final assessment point (Up to 3 Years)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Pioglitazone-2.8

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Fasting Blood Glucose) at Final Assessment Point

Changes from baseline in metabolic syndrome parameters at final assessment point (up to 3 years) were reported. The reported data on this outcome measure is in fasting blood glucose as a one of metabolic syndrome parameters. (NCT02002975)
Timeframe: From Baseline and final assessment point (Up to 3 Years)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Pioglitazone-25.4

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Systolic Blood Pressure) at Final Assessment Point

Changes from baseline in metabolic syndrome parameters at final assessment point (up to 3 years) were reported. The reported data on this outcome measure is in systolic blood pressure as a one of metabolic syndrome parameters. (NCT02002975)
Timeframe: From Baseline and final assessment point (Up to 3 Years)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Pioglitazone-3.1

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) [National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP)]) at Final Assessment Point

Changes from baseline in metabolic syndrome parameters at final assessment point (up to 3 years) were reported. The reported data on this outcome measure is in HbA1c (NGSP) as a one of metabolic syndrome parameters. (NCT02002975)
Timeframe: From Baseline and final assessment point (Up to 3 Years)

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Pioglitazone-1.04

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Fasting Blood Insulin Level) at Final Assessment Point

Changes from baseline in metabolic syndrome parameters at final assessment point (up to 3 years) were reported. The reported data on this outcome measure is in fasting blood insulin level as a one of metabolic syndrome parameters. (NCT02002975)
Timeframe: From Baseline and final assessment point (Up to 3 Years)

Interventionmicro unit/mL (Mean)
Pioglitazone-1.58

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Parameters (Fasting Triglyceride Level) at Final Assessment Point

Changes from baseline in metabolic syndrome parameters at final assessment point (up to 3 years) were reported. The reported data on this outcome measure is in fasting triglyceride level as a one of metabolic syndrome parameters. (NCT02002975)
Timeframe: From Baseline and final assessment point (Up to 3 Years)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Pioglitazone-28.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months or final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12) relative to baseline. (NCT02003014)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and final assessment (up to Month 12)

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Mean)
Baseline (n = 824)Change at Month 3 (n = 802)Change at Month 6 (n = 721)Change at Month 9 (n = 650)Change at Month 12 (n = 624)Change at Final Assessment (n = 824)
Pioglitazone8.34-0.71-0.79-0.85-0.910.85

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Immunoreactive Insulin (IRI)

The change in the value of IRI (portion of insulin in blood measured by immunochemical methods for the hormone; presumed to represent the free [unbound] and biologically active fraction of total blood insulin) collected at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months or final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12) relative to baseline. (NCT02003014)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and final assessment (up to Month 12)

Interventionmicro units per milliliter (mcU/mL) (Mean)
Baseline (n = 44)Change at Month 3 (n = 29)Change at Month 6 (n = 32)Change at Month 9 (n = 20)Change at Month 12 (n = 27)Change at Final Assessment (n = 44)
Pioglitazone10.320-1.390-2.438-2.970-1.774-1.077

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Serious Adverse Drug Reactions

Serious adverse drug reactions are defined as serious adverse events (SAEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. (NCT02003014)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

The change between homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance collected at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months or final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12) relative to baseline. Homeostasis Model assessment of insulin resistance Measures insulin resistance, calculated by insulin times glucose, divided by a constant (22.5). A higher score indicates higher insulin resistance. (NCT02003014)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and final assessment (up to Month 12)

InterventionHOMA-IR score (Mean)
Baseline (n = 43)Change at Month 3 (n = 28)Change at Month 6 (n = 31)Change at Month 9 (n = 20)Change at Month 12 (n = 26)Change at Final Assessment (n = 43)
Pioglitazone3.92-0.85-1.41-1.49-1.26-0.75

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight

Change relative to baseline in participant's weight measured at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months or final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12). (NCT02003014)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and final assessment (up to Month 12)

Interventionkg (Mean)
Baseline (n = 788)Change at Month 3 (n = 733)Change at Month 6 (n = 660)Change at Month 9 (n = 587)Change at Month 12 (n = 582)Change at Final Assessment (n = 788)
Pioglitazone68.9710.6671.1801.4401.4071.465

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions

Adverse drug reactions are defined as adverse events (AEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. (NCT02003014)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose

The change between the fasting blood glucose value collected at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months or final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12) relative to baseline. (NCT02003014)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and final assessment (up to Month 12)

Interventionmilligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (Mean)
Baseline (n = 210)Change at Month 3 (n = 179)Change at Month 6 (n = 152)Change at Month 9 (n = 143)Change at Month 12 (n = 146)Change at Final Assessment (n = 210)
Pioglitazone174.1-27.4-27.9-20.8-28.4-28.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin

Tabulation of fasting insulin test values and change at each test time point (test value at each test time point after baseline - test value at baseline). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. n=number of participants analyzed at each time point. Final assessment is defined as a cumulative assessment of Month 12 and Early Termination Visit data. (NCT02024971)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and final assessment

InterventionμU/dL (Mean)
Month 3 (n=22)Month 6 (n=46)Month 9 (n=22)Month 12 (n=51)Final Assessment (n=63)
Pioglitazone/Metformin Hydrochloride-1.768-2.374-1.018-2.524-2.107

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose

Tabulation of fasting blood glucose test values and change at each test time point (test value at each test time point after baseline - test value at baseline). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. n=number of participants analyzed at each time point. Final assessment is defined as a cumulative assessment of Month 12 and Early Termination Visit data. (NCT02024971)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and final assessment

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Month 3 (n=311)Month 6 (n=275)Month 9 (n=29)Month 12 (n=255)Final Assessment (n=375)
Pioglitazone/Metformin Hydrochloride-14.0-15.5-11.7-17.3-17.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Tabulation of the HbA1c test value and change at each test time point (test value at each test time point after baseline - test value at baseline). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. n=number of participants analyzed at each time point. Final assessment is defined as a cumulative assessment of Month 12 and Early Termination Visit data. (NCT02024971)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and final assessment

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Mean)
Month 3 (n=819)Month 6 (n=761)Month 9 (n=681)Month 12 (n=670)Final Assessment (n=896)
Pioglitazone/Metformin Hydrochloride-0.47-0.53-0.55-0.60-0.58

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions

Adverse events are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. Among these, events which are considered possibly associated with a medicinal product are defined as adverse drug reactions. (NCT02024971)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Thyroid cancerAnaemiaInsomniaDizzinessDysgeusiaRight ventricular failureDyspnoea exertionalAbdominal distensionConstipationNauseaHepatic function abnormalCold sweatMyalgiaRenal impairmentChest discomfortFace oedemaMalaiseOedemaOedema peripheralCardiothoracic ratio increasedBlood cholesterol increasedBlood triglycerides increasedLipids abnormalBlood creatinine increasedWeight increasedHeat illness
Pioglitazone/Metformin Hydrochloride111211121111111125111111141

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in LDL Cholesterol

(NCT02068508)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12, 24, 36, 52, and final assessment (up to Week 52)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52Change at Final Assessment
Pioglitazone-0.96-0.16-0.68-0.33-0.82

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HDL Cholesterol

(NCT02068508)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12, 24, 36, 52, and final assessment (up to Week 52)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52Change at Final Assessment
Pioglitazone3.321.981.791.352.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

(NCT02068508)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12, 24, 36, 52, and final assessment (up to Week 52)

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52Change at Final Assessment
Pioglitazone-0.62-0.75-0.77-0.75-0.72

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides

(NCT02068508)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12, 24, 36, 52, and final assessment (up to Week 52)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52Change at Final Assessment
Pioglitazone-20.7-19.8-28.4-8.5-16.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose

(NCT02068508)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12, 24, 36, 52, and final assessment (up to Week 52)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 36Change at Week 52Change at Final Assessment
Pioglitazone-26.2-23.9-21.7-21.4-23.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience at Least One Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)

ADRs are defined as adverse events (AEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. (NCT02068508)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pioglitazone213

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Received Specific Daily Dose of Insulin Product at Each Time Points

Number of participants who received study drug and specific daily dose of insulin product during the survey was reported. Daily dose of insulin was categorized by < 30 units, >= 30 and < 60 units, >= 60 and < 90 units, >= 90 units at each time points. (NCT02068508)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52, and final assessment (up to Week 52)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline71968089Week 5271968089Final Assessment71968089
>= 90 units of insulin product< 30 units of insulin product>= 30 and < 60 units of insulin product>= 60 and < 90 units of insulin product
Pioglitazone510
Pioglitazone359
Pioglitazone68
Pioglitazone16
Pioglitazone379
Pioglitazone256
Pioglitazone52
Pioglitazone10
Pioglitazone532
Pioglitazone363
Pioglitazone72
Pioglitazone15

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Requiring Alternative Treatment Due to Glycemic Failure of First Line Injectable Therapy

(NCT02072096)
Timeframe: Baseline to last participant visit (up to 72 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Strategy A (Glucose-Dependent)21
Strategy B (Reference)13

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving and Maintaining Individualized Glycated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Targets Without Clinically Significant Hypoglycemia

Failed to reach and maintain HbA1c target, without clinically significant hypoglycemia, is defined as having 2 consecutive HbA1c > upper limit of HbA1c target over 12 weeks starting from Week 24 for participants with HbA1c data beyond Week 24, or Week 24 HbA1c > upper limit of HbA1c target for participants without HbA1c data beyond Week 24. Clinically significant hypoglycemia is defined as any severe hypoglycemia or repeated hypoglycemia interrupting participants activities or sleep and associated with blood glucose ≤3.9 millimole per liter (mmol/L), or repeated asymptomatic hypoglycemia associated with blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L. Success is defined as lacking of failure. (NCT02072096)
Timeframe: Baseline to last participant visit (up to 72 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Strategy A (Glucose-Dependent)64.5
Strategy B (Reference)54.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)

The eGFR is used in addition to the Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio to measure the incidence and progression of diabetic kidney disease. (NCT02072096)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 72

Interventionmilliliter per minute/1.73 square meter (Mean)
Strategy A (Glucose-Dependent)-5.00
Strategy B (Reference)-5.88

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)

(NCT02072096)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 72

Interventionkilogram per square meter (kg/m^2) (Mean)
Strategy A (Glucose-Dependent)-0.47
Strategy B (Reference)0.20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio

The Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio is used in addition to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) to measure the incidence and progression of diabetic kidney disease. (NCT02072096)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 72

Interventionmilligram per millimole (mg/mmol) (Mean)
Strategy A (Glucose-Dependent)1.85
Strategy B (Reference)1.85

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Total Hypoglycemia and Other Categories of Hypoglycemia

(NCT02072096)
Timeframe: Baseline to last participant visit (up to 72 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Total HypoglycemiaSevere HypoglycemiaClinically Significant HypoglycemiaSymptomatic HypoglycemiaAsymptomatic HypoglycemiaProbable Symptomatic HypoglycemiaUnspecified HypoglycemiaRelative HypoglycemiaNocturnal Hypoglycemia
Strategy A (Glucose-Dependent)1000580214
Strategy B (Reference)5001343077610

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions

Adverse events are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. Among these, events which are considered possibly associated with a medicinal product are defined as adverse drug reactions. (NCT02098733)
Timeframe: For 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
HypoglycaemiaDizzinessDysgeusiaHeadacheHypoaesthesiaCardiac failureCardiac failure congestivePleural effusionEructationNauseaCholelithiasisDrug eruptionPruritusSwelling faceUrticariaFace oedemaFeeling abnormalHungerOedemaOedema peripheralSudden deathBlood creatine phosphokinase increasedAlanine aminotransferase increasedBlood triglycerides increasedBlood glucose decreasedWeight increased
Pioglitazone/Glimepiride134111211111121111274111118

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose Level

Tabulated the changes from baseline in fasting blood glucose level at each test time point (test value at each test time point after baseline - test value at baseline). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02098733)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and at Final Assessment

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Month 3 (n=331)Month 6 (n=287)Month 9 (n=273)Month 12 (n=462)Final Assessment (n=369)
Pioglitazone/Glimepiride-16.7-14.3-15.7-12.5-16.4

[back to top]

Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Tabulated glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at each test time point or final visit relative to baseline. (NCT02098733)
Timeframe: Baseline, and Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and at Final Assessment

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated haemoglobin (Mean)
At the start of treatment (n=1054)Month 3 (n=1016)Month 6 (n=893)Month 9 (n=831)Month 12 (n=462)Final Assessment (n=1054)
Pioglitazone/Glimepiride7.707.257.147.087.127.13

[back to top]

Fasting Insulin Level

Tabulated fasting insulin level at each test time point. (NCT02098733)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and at Final Assessment

InterventionμU/dL (Mean)
At the start of treatment (n=46)Month 3 (n=39)Month 6 (n=32)Month 9 (n=30)Month 12 (n=18)Final Assessment (n=46)
Pioglitazone/Glimepiride5.785.385.485.406.575.77

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Tabulated the changes from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values at each test time point (test value at each test time point after baseline - test value at baseline). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02098733)
Timeframe: Baseline, and Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and at Final Assessment

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated haemoglobin (Mean)
Month 3 (n=1016)Month 6 (n=893)Month 9 (n=831)Month 12 (n=462)Final Assessment (n=1,054)
Pioglitazone/Glimepiride-0.45-0.55-0.56-0.57-0.57

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Level

Tabulated the changes from baseline at each test time point (test value at each test time point after baseline - test value at baseline). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02098733)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and at Final Assessment

InterventionμU/dL (Mean)
Month 3 (n=39)Month 6 (n=32)Month 9 (n=30)Month 12 (n=18)Final Assessment (n=46)
Pioglitazone/Glimepiride-0.240.02-0.600.58-0.01

[back to top]

Fasting Blood Glucose Level

Tabulated fasting blood glucose level from baseline at each test time point. (NCT02098733)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and at Final Assessment

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
At the start of treatment (n=369)Month 3 (n=331)Month 6 (n=287)Month 9 (n=273)Month 12 (n=462)Final Assessment (n=369)
Pioglitazone/Glimepiride147.2130.2131.7129.2126.8130.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose Level

Tabulation of fasting blood glucose level and the changes from Baseline at each test time point (test value at each test time point after Baseline - test value at Baseline). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02098746)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and at Final assessment

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Month 3 (n=76)Month 6 (n=59)Month 9 (n=53)Month 12 (n=28)Final Assessment (n=83)
Pioglitazone/Glimepiride-15.9-23.2-12.7-17.0-17.7

[back to top]

Frequency of Serious Adverse Drug Reactions

Frequency of serious adverse drug reactions is defined at the number of participants with serious adverse drug reactions. Frequency of serious adverse drug reactions were tabulated by each symptom. Adverse events are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Among these, events which are considered possibly associated with a medicinal product are defined as adverse drug reactions. (NCT02098746)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pioglitazone/Glimepiride0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Level

Tabulation of fasting insulin level and the changes from Baseline at each test time point (test value at each test time point after Baseline - test value at Baseline). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02098746)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and at Final assessment

InterventionμU/dL (Mean)
Month 3 (n=33)Month 6 (n=25)Month 9 (n=17)Month 12 (n=15)Final Assessment (n=39)
Pioglitazone/Glimepiride1.66-0.251.32-0.290.98

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Tabulation of HbA1c values and the changes from Baseline at each test time point (test value at each test time point after Baseline - test value at Baseline). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02098746)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and at Final assessment

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Month 3 (n=234)Month 6 (n=190)Month 9 (n=177)Month 12 (n=84)Final Assessment (n=247)
Pioglitazone/Glimepiride-0.83-0.84-0.83-0.62-0.92

[back to top]

Frequency of Adverse Drug Reactions

Frequency of adverse drug reactions is defined as the number of participants with adverse drug reactions. Frequency, seriousness, and time to onset of adverse drug reactions were tabulated by each symptom. Adverse events are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. Among these, events which are considered possibly associated with a medicinal product are defined as adverse drug reactions. (NCT02098746)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AnaemiaHypoglycaemiaGeneralised oedemaOedemaWeight increased
Pioglitazone/Glimepiride17116

[back to top]

Change of ALT From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of ALT at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in ALT from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level). (NCT02099838)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
InterventionU/L (Mean)
ALT at BaselineALT at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12
Pioglitazone and Metformin21.9821.630.40
Placebo25.3524.800.47

[back to top]

Change of AST From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of AST at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in AST from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level). (NCT02099838)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
InterventionU/L (Mean)
AST at BaselineAST at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12
Pioglitazone and Metformin20.4721.12-0.41
Placebo22.2521.870.41

[back to top]

Change of DBil From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of DBil(direct bilirubin) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in DBil from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level). (NCT02099838)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
DBil at BaselineDBil at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12
Pioglitazone and Metformin3.913.690.12
Placebo3.923.320.55

[back to top]

Change of TC From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of TC(Total Cholesterol) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in TC from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level). (NCT02099838)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
TC at BaselineTC at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12
Pioglitazone and Metformin4.764.740.06
Placebo4.764.660.09

[back to top]

Change of TG From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of TG(Triglyceride) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in TG from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level). (NCT02099838)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
TG at BaselineTG at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12
Pioglitazone and Metformin1.761.660.09
Placebo1.711.85-0.17

[back to top]

Change of HbA1c From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of HbA1c at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then using the natural logarithm of HbA1c to analyze the change in HbA1c from baseline at week 12 and compare that between experiment group and control group, since the HbA1c wasn't normal distribution and was logarithmic normal distribution. Change = ln(Baseline Level) - ln(Week 12 Level). (NCT02099838)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionln(percent) (Mean)
ln(HbA1c) at Baselineln(HbA1c) at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12
Pioglitazone and Metformin2.141.950.19
Placebo2.102.020.07

[back to top]

Change of 2hPPG From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of 2hPPG(2-hour postprandial glucose) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in 2hPPG from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level). (NCT02099838)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
2hPPG at Baseline2hPPG at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12
Pioglitazone and Metformin16.4712.683.65
Placebo15.5915.230.45

[back to top]

Change of Fasting Insulin From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of fasting insulin at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then using the natural logarithm of fasting insulin to analyze the change in fasting insulin from baseline at week 12 and compare that between experiment group and control group, since the fasting insulin wasn't normal distribution and was logarithmic normal distribution. Change = ln(Baseline Level) - ln(Week 12 Level). (NCT02099838)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionln(mU/L) (Mean)
ln(Fasting Insulin) at Baselineln(Fasting Insulin) at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12
Pioglitazone and Metformin2.211.900.35
Placebo2.172.26-0.08

[back to top]

Change of FPG From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of FPG(fasting plasma glucose) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then using the natural logarithm of FPG to analyze the change in FPG from baseline at week 12 and compare that between experiment group and control group, since the FPG wasn't normal distribution and was logarithmic normal distribution. Change = ln(Baseline Level) - ln(Week 12 Level). (NCT02099838)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionln(mmol/L) (Mean)
ln(FPG) at Baselineln(FPG) at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12
Pioglitazone and Metformin2.161.910.25
Placebo2.082.050.04

[back to top]

Change of 2-hour Postprandial Insulin From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of 2-hour postprandial insulin at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then using the natural logarithm of 2-hour postprandial insulin to analyze the change in 2-hour postprandial insulin from baseline at week 12 and compare that between experiment group and control group, since the 2-hour postprandial insulin wasn't normal distribution and was logarithmic normal distribution. Change = ln(Baseline Level) - ln(Week 12 Level). (NCT02099838)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionln(mU/L) (Mean)
ln(2-hour Postprandial Insulin) at Baselineln(2-hour Postprandial Insulin) at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12
Pioglitazone and Metformin3.493.330.19
Placebo3.483.64-0.15

[back to top]

Change of HDL From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of HDL(High-Density Lipoprotein) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in HDL from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level). (NCT02099838)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
HDL at BaselineHDL at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12
Pioglitazone and Metformin1.221.33-0.09
Placebo1.131.150.00

[back to top]

Change of LDL From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of LDL(Low-Density Lipoprotein) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then using the natural logarithm of LDL to analyze the change in LDL from baseline at week 12 and compare that between experiment group and control group, since the LDL wasn't normal distribution and was logarithmic normal distribution. Change = ln(Baseline Level) - ln(Week 12 Level). (NCT02099838)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionln(mmol/L) (Mean)
ln(LDL) at Baselineln(LDL) at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12
Pioglitazone and Metformin0.900.890.02
Placebo0.870.830.03

[back to top]

Change of TBil From Baseline at Week 12

Measuring venous level of TBil(total bilirubin) at the start of the trail and at week 12 in all subjects, then analyzing the change in TBil from baseline at week 12 and comparing that between experiment group and control group. Change = (Baseline Level - Week 12 Level). (NCT02099838)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
TBil at BaselineTBil at Week 12Change from Baseline at Week 12
Pioglitazone and Metformin15.2614.720.31
Placebo14.0913.440.57

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters (Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-Cholesterol)) at 48 Week

Changes from baseline in laboratory parameter at 48 Week were reported. The reported data on this outcome measure is LDL-Cholesterol as a one of laboratory parameters. (NCT02181842)
Timeframe: From Baseline, Up to 48 Week

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Pioglitazone-1.85

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters (Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)) at 48 Week

Changes from baseline in laboratory parameter at 48 Week were reported. The reported data on this outcome measure is SBP as a one of laboratory parameters. (NCT02181842)
Timeframe: From Baseline, Up to 48 Week

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Pioglitazone-6.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Good Glycemic Control (Reduction in Fasting Blood Glucose Level < 130 mg/dL)

The reported data were percentage of participants who achieved good glycemic control at 48 Week. Good glycemic control was defined with fasting blood glucose level < 130 mg/dL. (NCT02181842)
Timeframe: 48 Week

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Pioglitazone42.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Good Glycemic Control (Reduction in HbA1c Values < 6.9 %)

The reported data were percentage of participants who achieved good glycemic control at 48 Week. Good glycemic control was defined with HbA1c (NGSP) Values < 6.9 %. (NCT02181842)
Timeframe: 48 Week

InterventionPercent age of Participants (Number)
Pioglitazone40.0

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 48 Week in Participants Stratified by Dose of Pioglitazone

The reported data were changes from baseline in laboratory parameter, that is HbA1c (National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program Criteria; NGSP), at 48 Week in participants stratified by specific characteristics, mean daily dose of pioglitazone, at the time of enrollment. Mean daily dose of pioglitazone at the time of enrollment were categorized into <15 mg, 15 to <30 mg, 30 <45 mg and 45 mg ≤ as planned (Note; final categorized number of participants was 0 in 45 mg ≤ group). (NCT02181842)
Timeframe: From Baseline, Up to 48 Week

InterventionPercent HbA1c (Mean)
<15 mg15 to <30 mg30 <45 mg
Pioglitazone-0.84-0.73-0.98

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in HbA1c at 48 Week in Participants Stratified by Gender

The reported data were changes from baseline in laboratory parameter, that is HbA1c (NGSP), at 48 Week in participants stratified by specific characteristics, Gender, at the time of enrollment. Gender was categorized into male and female. (NCT02181842)
Timeframe: From Baseline, Up to 48 Week

InterventionPercent HbA1c (Mean)
MaleFemale
Pioglitazone-0.59-1.11

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in HbA1c at 48 Week in Participants Stratified by Levels of BMI

The reported data were changes from baseline in laboratory parameter, that is HbA1c (NGSP), at 48 Week in participants stratified by specific characteristics, Levels of BMI, at the time of enrollment. Levels of BMI at the time of enrollment were categorized into <18.5 kg/m^2, 18.5 to <25 kg/m^2, 25 <30 kg/m^2, and 30 kg/m^2 ≤. (NCT02181842)
Timeframe: From Baseline, Up to 48 Week

InterventionPercent HbA1c (Mean)
<18.5 kg/m^218.5 to <25 kg/m^225 <30 kg/m^230 kg/m^2 ≤
Pioglitazone-0.6-0.73-0.81-1.3

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in HbA1c at 48 Week in Participants Stratified by Presence of Companion Anti-Diabetes Drugs

The reported data were changes from baseline in laboratory parameter, that is HbA1c (NGSP), at 48 Week in participants stratified by specific characteristics, presence of companion anti-diabetes drugs, at the time of enrollment. Presence of companion anti-diabetes drugs at the time of enrollment were categorized into Had presence of companion anti-diabetes drugs and Had no presence of companion anti-diabetes drugs. (NCT02181842)
Timeframe: From Baseline, Up to 48 Week

InterventionPercent HbA1c (Mean)
Had no Presence of Companion DrugsHad Presence of Companion Drugs
Pioglitazone-0.68-0.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience at Least One Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)

ADRs are defined as adverse events (AEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. (NCT02181842)
Timeframe: Up to 48 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pioglitazone23

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in HbA1c at 48 Week in Participants Stratified by Levels of HbA1c

The reported data were changes from baseline in laboratory parameter, that is HbA1c (NGSP), at 48 Week in participants stratified by specific characteristics, Levels of HbA1c, at the time of enrollment. Levels of HbA1c at the time of enrollment were categorized into <6.2%, 6.2 to <6.9%, 6.9 <7.4%, 7.4 <8.4%, and 8.4% ≤ as planned (Note; final categorized number of participants was 0 in <6.2% and 6.2 to <6.9% group). (NCT02181842)
Timeframe: From Baseline, Up to 48 Week

InterventionPercent HbA1c (Mean)
6.9 <7.4%7.4 <8.4%8.4% ≤
Pioglitazone-0.36-0.83-1.17

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters (Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)) at 48 Week

Changes from baseline in laboratory parameter at 48 Week were reported. The reported data on this outcome measure is DBP as a one of laboratory parameters. (NCT02181842)
Timeframe: From Baseline, Up to 48 Week

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Pioglitazone-5

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters (High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-Cholesterol)) at 48 Week

Changes from baseline in laboratory parameter at 48 Week were reported. The reported data on this outcome measure is HDL-Cholesterol as a one of laboratory parameters. (NCT02181842)
Timeframe: From Baseline, Up to 48 Week

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Pioglitazone3.97

[back to top]

Change in Apnea-hypopnea Index (AHI) Outcome Measure in Response to Pioglitazone or Placebo

To evaluate the effects of pioglitazone versus placebo on AHI in patients with OSA. (NCT02192684)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionAHI events/hour (Median)
Pioglitazone35.8
Placebo34.4

[back to top]

Weight

Body weight (NCT02303405)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionkilograms (Mean)
Hydroxychloroquine85.4
Pioglitazone87.0

[back to top]

HOMA-IR

Insulin resistance by the HOMA model (NCT02303405)
Timeframe: 4 months

InterventionuU/mL*mg/dL (Mean)
Hydroxychloroquine3.91
Pioglitazone1.48

[back to top]

Hemoglobin A1c

Glycemic control (NCT02303405)
Timeframe: 4 months

Intervention% of hemoglobin (Mean)
Hydroxychloroquine7.4
Pioglitazone6.3

[back to top]

Fasting Plasma Glucose

Fasting glucose level (NCT02303405)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Hydroxychloroquine147
Pioglitazone105

[back to top]

Body Mass Index

Body mass index (BMI) (NCT02303405)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionkg per square meter (Mean)
Hydroxychloroquine35.2
Pioglitazone35.5

[back to top]

Hypoglycemic Events

Number of hypoglycemic events (NCT02303405)
Timeframe: 4 months

InterventionEvents (Number)
Hydroxychloroquine0
Pioglitazone6.0

[back to top]

Hs-CRP

Highly-sensitive C-reactive protein (inflammatory marker) (NCT02303405)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Hydroxychloroquine4.2
Pioglitazone3.3

[back to top]

Leucocyte Count

White cell count (surrogate marker of inflammation) (NCT02303405)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionx 10^9 cells/ L (Mean)
Hydroxychloroquine7.7
Pioglitazone6.8

[back to top]

Percent of Subjects Achieving HbA1c < 7.5%

Percent of subjects achieving a HbA1c level < 7.5% (NCT02303405)
Timeframe: 4 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hydroxychloroquine10
Pioglitazone7

[back to top]

QUICKI

Insulin resistance by the QUICKI model (NCT02303405)
Timeframe: 4 months

Intervention(Log(uU/dL)+Log(mg/dL))^-1 (Mean)
Hydroxychloroquine0.32
Pioglitazone0.38

[back to top]

Adverse Events

All other adverse events other than hypoglycemia (NCT02303405)
Timeframe: 4 months

InterventionEvents (Number)
Hydroxychloroquine0
Pioglitazone1.0

[back to top]

Change in Vascular Function and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by PWV at Month 3

"Change in vascular function using non-invasive vascular tests, measuring vascular compliance -Pulse, wave, velocity (PWV).~The central aortic pressure PWV was determined by using the pressure tonometer and an EKG signal was used simultaneously to visualize ventricular-vascular interactions. It increases with atherosclerosis progression. Central aortic BP and stiffness were quantified using SphygmoCor CP system (AtCor Medical Pty Ltd.; New South Wales, Australia)." (NCT02338999)
Timeframe: 3 months after start of first intervention (Baseline to 3 months)

Interventionm/s (Mean)
Pioglitazone, Then Placebo-0.31
Placebo, Then Pioglitazone0.03

[back to top]

Change in Vascular Function and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by Left CAVI at Month 8

"Change in vascular function using non-invasive vascular tests, measuring vascular compliance - Cardio ankle vascular index (CAVI).~CAVI is an index reflecting the stiffness of the artery from the heart to ankles; it increases with atherosclerosis progression. CAVI was measured using VaSera-1500A (Fukuda Denshi Co. Redmond, WA)" (NCT02338999)
Timeframe: 3 months after start of second intervention (5 months to 8 months)

Interventionunitless (Mean)
Pioglitazone, Then Placebo-0.29
Placebo, Then Pioglitazone-0.07

[back to top]

Change in Vascular Function and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by Left CAVI at Month 3

"Change in vascular function using non-invasive vascular tests, measuring vascular compliance - Cardio ankle vascular index (CAVI).~CAVI is an index reflecting the stiffness of the artery from the heart to ankles; it increases with atherosclerosis progression. CAVI was measured using VaSera-1500A (Fukuda Denshi Co. Redmond, WA)" (NCT02338999)
Timeframe: 3 months after start of first intervention (Baseline to 3 months)

Interventionunitless (Mean)
Pioglitazone, Then Placebo-0.32
Placebo, Then Pioglitazone0.09

[back to top]

Change in Vascular Function and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by RHI at Month 8

"Change in vascular function using non-invasive vascular tests, measuring vascular compliance -Reactive hyperemia index (RHI).~RHI is a measure of endothelial dysfunction using noninvasive peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT). It is a ratio of the post-to-pre occlusion PAT amplitude of the tested arm, divided by the post-to-pre occlusion ratio of the control arm. RHI less than 1.67 is considered sign of endothelial dysfunction and RHI equal to or greater than 1.67 is considered normal function. The possible range of scores is 1 to 3. Increasing score indicates the improvement of coronary endothelial function" (NCT02338999)
Timeframe: 3 months after start of second intervention (5 months to 8 months)

Interventionratio (Mean)
Pioglitazone, Then Placebo-0.05
Placebo, Then Pioglitazone0.02

[back to top]

Change in Vascular Function and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by RHI at Month 3

"Change in vascular function using non-invasive vascular tests, measuring vascular compliance -Reactive hyperemia index (RHI).~RHI is a measure of endothelial dysfunction using noninvasive peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT). It is a ratio of the post-to-pre occlusion PAT amplitude of the tested arm, divided by the post-to-pre occlusion ratio of the control arm. RHI less than 1.67 is considered sign of endothelial dysfunction and RHI equal to or greater than 1.67 is considered normal function. The possible range of scores is 1 to 3. Increasing score indicates the improvement of coronary endothelial function" (NCT02338999)
Timeframe: 3 months after start of first intervention (Baseline to 3 months)

Interventionratio (Mean)
Pioglitazone, Then Placebo0.07
Placebo, Then Pioglitazone0.02

[back to top]

Change in Vascular Function and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by Right CAVI at Month 8

"Change in vascular function using non-invasive vascular tests, measuring vascular compliance - Cardio ankle vascular index (CAVI).~CAVI is an index reflecting the stiffness of the artery from the heart to ankles; it increases with atherosclerosis progression. CAVI was measured using VaSera-1500A (Fukuda Denshi Co. Redmond, WA)" (NCT02338999)
Timeframe: 3 months after start of second intervention (5 months to 8 months)

Interventionunitless (Mean)
Pioglitazone, Then Placebo-0.26
Placebo, Then Pioglitazone-0.08

[back to top]

Change in Vascular Function and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by Right CAVI at Month 3

"Change in vascular function using non-invasive vascular tests, measuring vascular compliance - Cardio ankle vascular index (CAVI).~CAVI is an index reflecting the stiffness of the artery from the heart to ankles; it increases with atherosclerosis progression. CAVI was measured using VaSera-1500A (Fukuda Denshi Co. Redmond, WA)" (NCT02338999)
Timeframe: 3 months after start of first intervention (Baseline to 3 months)

Interventionunitless (Mean)
Pioglitazone, Then Placebo-0.42
Placebo, Then Pioglitazone0.12

[back to top]

Change in Vascular Function and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by PWV at Month 8

"Change in vascular function using non-invasive vascular tests, measuring vascular compliance -Pulse, wave, velocity (PWV).~The central aortic pressure PWV was determined by using the pressure tonometer and an EKG signal was used simultaneously to visualize ventricular-vascular interactions. It increases with atherosclerosis progression. Central aortic BP and stiffness were quantified using SphygmoCor CP system (AtCor Medical Pty Ltd.; New South Wales, Australia)." (NCT02338999)
Timeframe: 3 months after start of second intervention (5 months to 8 months)

Interventionm/s (Mean)
Pioglitazone, Then Placebo-0.31
Placebo, Then Pioglitazone-0.25

[back to top]

Effect of Pioglitazone on Vascular Inflammation and Cardiometabolic Risk as Measured by TBR Value at Month 3

Change in vascular inflammation using non-invasive vascular test, measuring changes in target to blood pool ratio (TBR) value by positron emission tomography (PET) computerized tomography (CT). The higher the value, the higher the degree of vascular inflammation. (NCT02338999)
Timeframe: 3 months after start of first intervention (Baseline to 3 months)

Interventionratio (Mean)
Pioglitazone, Then Placebo0.0337
Placebo, Then Pioglitazone0.0351

[back to top]

Mean Number of Squamous Cell Carcinomas

Squamous Cell Carcinomas were counted by visual inspection of the all skin on the body. (NCT02347813)
Timeframe: 1 year

Intervention# of squamous cell carcinomas (Mean)
No Intervention0.75
Pioglitazone1.00

[back to top]

Mean Number of Other Skin Cancers

Cancers were counted by visual inspection of the all skin on the body. Patients were inspected for the following cancer types: squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma and melanoma. (NCT02347813)
Timeframe: 1 year

Intervention# of other carcinomas (Mean)
No Intervention1
Pioglitazone0

[back to top]

Efficacy Blood Pressure

mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure (NCT02697617)
Timeframe: average of 4 measures over 12 months

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
systolic blood pressurediastolic blood pressure
Pioglitazone 15 mg12783
Placebo12982

[back to top]

Safety: Hypoglycemia

number of patients with blood sugar < 70 mg/dl (NCT02697617)
Timeframe: measured quarterly for 12 months in pioglitazone and same in placebo

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pioglitazone 15 mg1
Placebo1

[back to top]

Safety: Elevated Liver Function Tests

Number of patients with elevated liver test (ALT or AST) > 2 times upper limit of normal (NCT02697617)
Timeframe: measured quarterly over 12 months for each arm

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pioglitazone 15 mg0
Placebo1

[back to top]

Efficacy: Glomerular Filtration Rate

average estimated glomerular filtration rate by chronic kidney disease (CKD) epidemiologic (epi) formula measured quarterly (NCT02697617)
Timeframe: average of 4 values over 12 months

Interventionml/min/m2 (Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg75.5
Placebo78.1

[back to top]

Safety: Total Body Water

Bioimpedance analysis (BIA)(Ohms); Increase in BIA in Ohms indicates a decrease in total body water (NCT02697617)
Timeframe: average of 4 measures in each 12 month arm

InterventionOhms (Mean)
Pioglitazone45.78
Placebo44.17

[back to top]

Efficacy: Percent Change in Total Kidney Volume

Change in total kidney volume by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) from beginning to end of the 12 months (NCT02697617)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of year 1, and end of year 2

Interventionpercentage of change (Mean)
Pioglitazone 15 mg Daily4.35
Placebo po Daily7.85

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Graded According to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03

The AE incidence will be described. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs will be assessed through scheduled assessments and subject reported diaries. (NCT02730195)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after the end of treatment

Interventionevents (Number)
Number of Grade 1 EventsNumber of Grade 2 EventsNumber of Grade 3 EventsNumber of Grade 4 EventsNumber of Grade 5 Events
Pioglitazone & TKI Therapy410000

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Who Lose MMR Following Discontinuation of Pioglitazone and TKI Using Blood qRT-PCR for BCR-ABL1

The proportion of subjects that has reappearance of BCR-ABL1 will be described. Descriptive statistics that will summarize the changes in BCR-ABL1 testing over time will be presented. Loss of MMR is defined as a BCR-ABL1 > 0.1% by qRT-PCR confirmed within a week and associated with a rise in the titer on a confirmatory test obtained 4 weeks later (European Leukemia Net definition). Subgroup analyses will be performed by baseline potential prognostic factors. Subgroups will include: age, gender, race, underlying diagnosis, and other disease-related prognostic factors (disease status). (NCT02730195)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pioglitazone & TKI Therapy7

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve and Maintain Major Molecular Response (MMR) Following a Second Discontinuation of TKI Using Blood Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) for Breakpoint Cluster Region-Abelson1 (BCR-ABL1)

The proportion of subjects that has reappearance of BCR-ABL1 will be described. Descriptive statistics that will summarize the changes in BCR-ABL1 testing over time will be presented. Subgroup analyses will be performed by baseline potential prognostic factors. Subgroups will include: age, gender, race, underlying diagnosis, and other disease-related prognostic factors (disease status). (NCT02730195)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pioglitazone & TKI Therapy8

[back to top]

Feasibility - Subject Retention as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Completed All 12 Weeks of the Study

(NCT02774343)
Timeframe: week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management12
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management11

[back to top]

Feasibility - Medication Compliance as Assessed by Percentage of Urine Samples That Were Riboflavin-Positive

Riboflavin was added to pill capsules as a marker of medication compliance. The percentage over all time points is reported in this outcome measure. Urine samples were collected once weekly. (NCT02774343)
Timeframe: weeks 1 - 12

Interventionpercentage of urine samples (Mean)
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management96.2
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management95.4

[back to top]

Feasibility - Medication Compliance as Assessed by Percentage of Self-reports That Indicate Capsules Were Taken

A modified Timeline Followback (TLFB) procedure was used for self-reports. The percentage over all time points is reported in this outcome measure. Self-reports were collected once weekly. (NCT02774343)
Timeframe: weeks 1 - 12

Interventionpercentage of self-reports (Mean)
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management84.1
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management86.9

[back to top]

Craving as Assessed by the Obsessive Compulsive Drug Use Scale (OCDUS)

The obsessive compulsive drug use scale (OCDUS) measures the level of craving for cocaine during the past week. The mean score over all time points is reported in this outcome measure (i.e., a summary score is reported). The scale was administered once weekly. It consists of 12 items. The score range is 0 to 60, and higher scores indicates greater craving. (NCT02774343)
Timeframe: Weeks 1-12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management19.1
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management21.36

[back to top]

Cocaine Use as Assessed by Percentage of Urine Samples That Were Cocaine-positive

The mean percentage over all time points is reported in this outcome measure. Urine samples were collected once weekly. (NCT02774343)
Timeframe: Weeks 1-12

Interventionpercentage of urine samples (Mean)
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management44
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management50

[back to top]

Cocaine Use as Assessed by Percentage of Self-reports That Indicate Cocaine Use

A modified Timeline Followback (TLFB) procedure was used to assess cocaine use. The mean percentage over all time points is reported in this outcome measure. Self-reports were collected once weekly. (NCT02774343)
Timeframe: Weeks 1-12

Interventionpercentage of self-reports (Mean)
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management35
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management29

[back to top]

Feasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effects

(NCT02774343)
Timeframe: week 12

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
drowsinessnot sleeping wellheadachenervousnessblurry visiondizzinessnauseavomitingdiarrheastomach painmuscle achesshortness of breathcoughincreased urinationchange in sexual functionweaknessfatiguedifficulty walkingfever or chillsloss of appetiteconfusioncloudinessmemory loss
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management02000001230044101100001
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management11122111121111110021110

[back to top]

Cue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Craving

"Every two weeks, visual analog scale ratings of craving (VAS craving) consisting of 100 mm line, anchored by 0 not at all and 100 extremely, were used to assess cocaine craving right now, craving on average in the past week, and the worst craving in the past week. Data were analyzed as a total score, which is the sum of the scores for the three questions." (NCT02774343)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
baselineweek 2week 4week 6week 8week 10week 12
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management57.5053.7637.9321.7525.7018.3315.38
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management52.2940.3135.5829.8635.8831.4227.86

[back to top]

Craving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)

The brief substance craving scale (BSCS) is a 16-item, self-report instrument assesses craving for cocaine and other substances of abuse over a 24 hour period. The domains of intensity, frequency, and duration are recorded on a five-point Likert scale. The range of scores for each domain is 0 to 4, and the total score is the sum of all three domains. The total score range is 0 to 12, and higher scores indicate higher craving (worse outcome.) (NCT02774343)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, week 7, week 8, week 9, week 10, week 11, week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
baselineweek 1week 2week 3week 4week 5week 6week 7week 8week 9week 10week 11week 12
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management5.575.004.424.004.002.603.222.123.252.882.562.892.00
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management6.235.082.913.823.183.823.454.363.553.823.363.823.55

[back to top]

Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Splenium of Corpus Callosum)

DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index. (NCT02774343)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
InterventionDTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) value (Mean)
baselineweek 12
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management645.49655.41
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management635.81620.98

[back to top]

Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Posterior Thalamic Radiation)

DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index. (NCT02774343)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
InterventionDTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) value (Mean)
baselineweek 12
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management542.27546.84
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management546.26535.14

[back to top]

Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Genu of Corpus Callosum)

DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index. (NCT02774343)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
InterventionDTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) value (Mean)
baselineweek 12
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management566.66575.06
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management562.52547.15

[back to top]

Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - External Capsule)

DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index. (NCT02774343)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
InterventionDTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) value (Mean)
baselineweek 12
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management420.68423.91
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management418.71418.25

[back to top]

Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Cingulum)

DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index. (NCT02774343)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
InterventionDTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) value (Mean)
baselineweek 12
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management465.06471.40
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management463.91465.75

[back to top]

Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Anterior Thalamic Radiation)

DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index. (NCT02774343)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
InterventionDTI Fractional Anisotropy (FA) value (Mean)
baselineweek 12
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management518.20522.40
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management530.31523.00

[back to top]

Feasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

(NCT02774343)
Timeframe: week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management0
Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period

Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 52 value. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-1.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Daily Average of the 7-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) to Week 26: Core Period

The 7-point SMPG profile was measured at the following 7 points: pre-prandial and 2 hours postprandial for breakfast, lunch, dinner and at bedtime. Two hours postprandial (breakfast, lunch and dinner) was defined as 2 hours after the start of the meal. Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM to account for missing data using all available post baseline data during the 26 week treatment period. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-1.69
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist-0.67

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Blood Glucose Excursion During Standardized Meal Test to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period

2-hour plasma glucose excursion = 2-hour PPG value minus plasma glucose value obtained 30 minutes prior to the start of meal and before IMP administration if IMP was injected before breakfast. Change in plasma glucose excursions were calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 52 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-1.85

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7% or <=6.5% at Week 26: Core Period

Participants without any available HbA1c assessment at Week 26 were considered as non-responders. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Week 26

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HbA1c <7%HbA1c <=6.5%
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist25.79.9
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)61.940.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7 % or <=6.5% at Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period

Participants without any available HbA1c assessment at Week 52 were considered as non-responders. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HbA1c <7%HbA1c <=6.5%
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)64.142.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) During Standardized Meal Test to Week 26: Core Period

The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a liquid standardized breakfast meal. Change in PPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-3.96
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist-1.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) During Standardized Meal Test to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period

The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a liquid standardized breakfast meal. Change in PPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 52 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-4.30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26: Core Period

Change in body weight was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionkilogram (kg) (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)1.89
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist-1.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Blood Glucose Excursion During Standardized Meal Test to Week 26: Core Period

2-hour plasma glucose excursion = 2-hour PPG value minus plasma glucose value obtained 30 minutes prior to the start of meal and before investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration if IMP was injected before breakfast. Change in plasma glucose excursions were calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-1.51
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist-0.52

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Daily Average of the 7-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period

The 7-point SMPG profile was measured at the following 7 points: pre-prandial and 2 hours postprandial for breakfast, lunch, dinner and at bedtime. Two hours postprandial (breakfast, lunch and dinner) was defined as 2 hours after the start of the meal. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-1.68

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During the 26 Week Treatment Period: Core Period

Routine HbA1c value was used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. Threshold values at Week 12 or later on Week 12: HbA1c >8%. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)4.8
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist15.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During the 52 Week Treatment Period: Single Arm Extension Period

Routine HbA1c value was used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. Threshold values at Week 12 or later on Week 12: HbA1c >8%. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: From Week 26 to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)1.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period

Change in body weight was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 52 value. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionkg (Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)2.78

[back to top]

Number of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia Events Per Participant-Year: Core Period

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of <=3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). Hypoglycemic episodes with plasma glucose of <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) were also analyzed. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 26

,
Interventionevents per participant-year (Number)
Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia(<=3.9 mmol/L)Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (<3.0 mmol/L)
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist0.080.01
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)1.540.25

[back to top]

Number of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia Events Per Participant-Year: Single Arm Extension Period

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of <=3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). Hypoglycemic episodes with plasma glucose of <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) were also analyzed. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionevents per participant-year (Number)
Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia(<=3.9 mmol/L)Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (<3.0 mmol/L)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)1.590.24

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) to Week 26: Core Period

Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Adjusted least squares (LS) mean and standard error (SE) were obtained from Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data using all available post baseline data during the 26 week treatment period. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-1.02
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist-0.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period

Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 52 value. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-2.27

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 26: Core Period

Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM to account for missing data using all available post baseline data during the 26 week treatment period. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmillimoles per litre (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-2.28
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist-0.60

[back to top]

Genes With Significant Changes From Baseline to Days 11-22 for Tumor-Normal Tissue: Change in Whole Transcriptome Gene Analysis on Total Ribonucleic Acid Samples

The plan was to summarize for baseline, post-exposure, and absolute change by treatment arm using the appropriate descriptive statistics, and will be evaluated with Student's t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. (NCT02917629)
Timeframe: Baseline to days 11-22

,
Interventionraw counts of RNA sequencing reads (Mean)
ENSG00000232479ENSG00000233163ENSG00000249245
Group I ACTOplus Met XR1.00131.0037-1.0098
Group II (Placebo)-1.0087-1.00030.0000

[back to top]

Genes With Significant Changes From Baseline to Days 11-22 in Tumor Tissue in Treated Participants: Change in Whole Transcriptome Gene Analysis on Total Ribonucleic Acid Samples

Will be summarized for baseline, post-exposure, and absolute change by treatment arm using the appropriate descriptive statistics, and will be evaluated with Student's t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. (NCT02917629)
Timeframe: Baseline to days 11-22

,
Interventionraw counts of RNA sequencing reads (Mean)
ENSG00000229822ENSG00000230585ENSG00000249245ENSG00000261792
Group I ACTOplus Met XR1.0011-1.0217-1.00981.0007
Group II (Placebo)-5.0023-3.01080.00000.0000

[back to top]

Human Papillomavirus Status Assessed in Tumor Tissue by p16 by Immunohistochemistry

Human papillomavirus status will be assessed in tumor tissue by p16 by immunohistochemistry. (NCT02917629)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PositiveNot Tested
Group I (ACTOplus Met XR)22
Group II (Placebo)02

[back to top]

Genes With Significant Changes From Baseline to Days 11-22 for Normal Tissue: Change in Whole Transcriptome Gene Analysis on Total Ribonucleic Acid Samples

Will be summarized for baseline, post-exposure, and absolute change by treatment arm using the appropriate descriptive statistics, and will be evaluated with Student's t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. (NCT02917629)
Timeframe: Baseline to days 11-22

Interventionraw counts of RNA sequencing reads (Mean)
Group I ACTOplus Met XR1.0060
Group II (Placebo)2.0135

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Proliferation Index (Ki-67) Expression, Assessed in Tumor Tissue by Immunohistochemistry

Baseline, post-exposure, absolute change in Ki-67, and difference in absolute change between the ACTOplus met XR and placebo subjects will all be summarized with descriptive statistics. Ki-67 is a semi-quantitative immune-histochemistry analysis in which a computer generates an analysis based on the staining within tumor and normal cells leading to a score which is an indirect measure of cellular proliferation. Will compare the difference in absolute change in Ki-67 between the ACTOplus met XR and placebo arms using a two sided two-sample Student's t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, as appropriate, at a significance level of 0.05. (NCT02917629)
Timeframe: Baseline to days 11-22

,
Interventionproliferation index expression (Median)
baselineDay 11-22absolute change from baseline
Group I (ACTOplus Met XR)20.4017.57-2.68
Group II (Placebo)13.6936.9624.82

[back to top]

Change in Cleaved Caspase 3 Expression in Visually Normal Appearing Tissue and Tumor Tissue Samples, Assessed by Immunohistochemistry

Cleaved Caspase 3 is a semi-quantitative immune-histochemistry analysis in which a computer generates an analysis based on the staining within tumor and normal cells leading to a score which is a direct measure of cellular apoptosis. Will be summarized for baseline, post-exposure, and absolute change by treatment arm using the appropriate descriptive statistics, and will be evaluated with Student's t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. (NCT02917629)
Timeframe: Baseline to days 11-22

,
Interventionpercent positive cells (Mean)
Baseline Tumor TissuePost-Exposure Tumor TissueBaseline Normal TissuePost-Exposure Normal Tissue
Group I (ACTOplus Met XR)1.0003.3330.0000.000
Group II (Placebo)1.0004.0000.0000.000

[back to top]

Change in Cyclin D1, p21 and Biguanide or Phosphorylated AKT, Phosphorylated AMPK, Phosphorylated S6 (Metformin), and PPAR Gamma Expression, Assessed by Immunohistochemistry

Will be summarized for baseline, post-exposure, and absolute change by treatment arm using the appropriate descriptive statistics, and will be evaluated with Student's t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. (NCT02917629)
Timeframe: Baseline to days 11-22

,
Interventionpercent positive cells (Median)
Cyclin D1 BaselineCyclin D1 Day 11-22Absolute change in Cyclin D1 from BaselineP21 BaselineP21 Day 11-22Absolute change in P21 from BaselinePhosphorylated AKT BaselinePhosphorylated AKT Day 11-22Absolute change in phosphorylated AKT from baselinePhosphorylated AMPK at BaselinePhosphorylated AMPK Day 11-22Absolute change in phosphorylated AMPK from baselinePPAR gamma at BaselinePPAR gamma Day 11-22Absolute change in PPAR gamma from baselinePhosphorylated S6 at BaselinePhosphorylated S6 Day 11-22Absolute change in phosphorylated S6 from Baseline
Group I (ACTOplus Met XR)0.0510.050-0.00660.0900.068-0.00930.000180.000480.000310.0790.1310.0520.05470.0061-0.0220.2840.2820.029
Group II (Placebo)0.0200.0330.00190.1120.052-0.06050.000130.000420.000160.3630.030-0.3330.01380.02000.0190.1880.071-0.028

[back to top]

Change in Ki-67 Expression in Visually Normal Appearing Tissue, Assessed by Immunohistochemistry

Will be summarized for baseline, post-exposure, and absolute change by treatment arm using the appropriate descriptive statistics, and will be evaluated with Student's t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. (NCT02917629)
Timeframe: Baseline to days 11-22

,
Interventionproliferation index expression (Median)
baselineDay 11-22absolute change from baseline
Group I (ACTOplus Met XR)17.5811.81-5.77
Group II (Placebo)14.5226.0517.25

[back to top]

Change in Regulatory T Cell, T4, T8, Tumor-associated Macrophage-CD68 Positive, PD1, PD-L1 Expression, Assessed in Tumor Tissue by Immunohistochemistry

Will be summarized for baseline, post-exposure, and absolute change by treatment arm using the appropriate descriptive statistics, and will be evaluated with Student's t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. (NCT02917629)
Timeframe: Baseline to days 11-22

,
Interventionpercent positive cells (Median)
CD68 BaselineCD68 Day 11-22Absolute Change in CD68 from BaselinePD1 BaselinePD1 Day 11-22Absolute Change in PD1 from BaselinePD-L1 BaselinePD-L1 Day 11-22Absolute Change in PD-L1 from BaselineCD8 BaselineCD8 Day 11-22Absolute Change in CD8 from BaselineCD4 BaselineCD4 Day 11-22Absolute Change in CD4 from BaselineFoxP3 BaselineFoxP3 Day 11-22Absolute Change in FoxP3 from Baseline
Group I (ACTOplus Met XR)0.110.10-0.0330.05200.0088-0.0450.06320.0494-0.0120.2440.095-0.2180.1930.1590.0430.0270.0200.0034
Group II (Placebo)0.1900.230.0680.03560.07210.0500.00860.01360.0120.1410.1890.0860.1950.074-0.1280.0570.0380.0235

[back to top]

Hazard Ratio of the 10 Most Common Cancers Associated With Time Since First Use of Pioglitazone

The hazard ratio of the 10 most common cancers: prostate, female breast, lung/bronchus, endometrial, colon, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pancreas, kidney/renal pelvis, rectal, and melanoma associated with time since first use of pioglitazone. The various times since initiation include <12 months ago, 12-23 months ago, 24-35 months ago, 36-47 months ago, 48-83 months ago and 84+ months ago. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to provide point and interval estimates of the time since first use. In all regression analyses, these measures of exposure to pioglitazone were treated as time-dependent covariates and time since entry into the cohort was the time scale. (NCT02958956)
Timeframe: 15 years 5 months

InterventionRatio (Number)
Prostate: <12 months agoProstate: 12-23 months agoProstate: 24-35 months agoProstate: 36-47 months agoProstate: 48-83 months agoProstate: 84+ months agoBreast: <12 months agoBreast: 12-23 months agoBreast: 24-35 months agoBreast: 36-47 months agoBreast: 48-83 months agoBreast: 84+ months agoLung/Bronchus: <12 months agoLung/Bronchus: 12-23 months agoLung/Bronchus: 24-35 months agoLung/Bronchus: 36-47 months agoLung/Bronchus: 48-83 months agoLung/Bronchus: 84+ months agoColon: <12 months agoColon: 12-23 months agoColon: 24-35 months agoColon: 36-47 months agoColon: 48-83 months agoColon: 84+ months agoNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: <12 months agoNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 12-23 months agoNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 24-35 months agoNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 36-47 months agoNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 48-83 months agoNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 84+ months agoCorpus Uteri: <12 months agoCorpus Uteri: 12-23 months agoCorpus Uteri: 24-35 months agoCorpus Uteri: 36-47 months agoCorpus Uteri: 48-83 months agoCorpus Uteri: 84+ months agoPancreatic: <12 months agoPancreatic: 12-23 months agoPancreatic: 24-35 months agoPancreatic: 36-47 months agoPancreatic: 48-83 months agoPancreatic: 84+ months agoKidney/Renal Pelvis: <12 months agoKidney/Renal Pelvis: 12-23 months agoKidney/Renal Pelvis: 24-35 months agoKidney/Renal Pelvis: 36-47 months agoKidney/Renal Pelvis: 48-83 months agoKidney/Renal Pelvis: 84+ months agoRectum: <12 months agoRectum: 12-23 months agoRectum: 24-35 months agoRectum: 36-47 months agoRectum: 48-83 months agoRectum: 84+ months agoMelanoma: <12 months agoMelanoma: 12-23 months agoMelanoma: 24-35 months agoMelanoma: 36-47 months agoMelanoma: 48-83 months agoMelanoma: 84+ months ago
Full Cohort0.921.181.211.361.041.231.000.841.040.771.031.380.821.121.131.040.950.960.620.791.350.810.970.791.151.440.920.790.700.980.910.970.650.900.990.942.271.311.131.281.141.390.750.591.141.161.010.900.670.651.021.270.600.871.031.371.021.450.961.47

[back to top]

Hazard Ratio of the 10 Most Common Cancers Associated With Cumulative Dose of Pioglitazone

The hazard ratio of the 10 most common cancers: prostate, female breast, lung/bronchus, endometrial, colon, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pancreas, kidney/renal pelvis, rectal, and melanoma associated with dose of pioglitazone. The various doses include 1-9000 mg, 9001-25000 mg, 25001-50000 milligram (mg) and greater than or equal to (>=) 50001 mg. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to provide point and interval estimates of the dose. In all regression analyses, these measures of exposure to pioglitazone were treated as time-dependent covariates and time since entry into the cohort was the time scale. (NCT02958956)
Timeframe: 15 years 5 months

InterventionRatio (Number)
Prostate: 1-9000 mgProstate: 9001-25000 mgProstate: 25001-50000 mgProstate: >=50001 mgBreast: 1-9000 mgBreast: 9001-25000 mgBreast: 25001-50000 mgBreast: >=50001 mgLung/Bronchus: 1-9000 mgLung/Bronchus: 9001-25000 mgLung/Bronchus: 25001-50000 mgLung/Bronchus: >=50001 mgColon: 1-9000 mgColon: 9001-25000 mgColon: 25001-50000 mgColon: >=50001 mgNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 1-9000 mgNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 9001-25000 mgNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 25001-50000 mgNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: >=50001 mgCorpus Uteri: 1-9000 mgCorpus Uteri: 9001-25000 mgCorpus Uteri: 25001-50000 mgCorpus Uteri: >=50001 mgPancreatic: 1-9000 mgPancreatic: 9001-25000 mgPancreatic: 25001-50000 mgPancreatic: >=50001 mgKidney/Renal Pelvis: 1-9000 mgKidney/Renal Pelvis: 9001-25000 mgKidney/Renal Pelvis: 25001-50000 mgKidney/Renal Pelvis: >=50001 mgRectum: 1-9000 mgRectum: 9001-25000 mgRectum: 25001-50000 mgRectum: >=50001 mgMelanoma: 1-9000 mgMelanoma: 9001-25000 mgMelanoma: 25001-50000 mgMelanoma: >=50001 mg
Full Cohort1.081.241.121.000.890.951.151.190.980.910.971.120.870.860.970.790.921.161.020.661.020.900.670.871.501.101.461.610.831.030.861.050.840.760.750.821.201.261.031.14

[back to top]

Number of 10 Most Common Cancers Cases by Time Since First Use of Pioglitazone

Number of 10 most common cancer cases: prostate, female breast, lung/bronchus, endometrial, colon, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pancreas, kidney/renal pelvis, rectal, and melanoma associated with time since first use of pioglitazone. Time since initiation of pioglitazone was categorized as <12 months ago, 12-23 months ago, 24-35 months ago, 36-47 months ago, 48-83 months ago and 84+ months ago. (NCT02958956)
Timeframe: 15 years 5 months

InterventionCases (Number)
Prostate: <12 months agoProstate: 12-23 months agoProstate: 24-35 months agoProstate: 36-47 months agoProstate: 48-83 months agoProstate: 84+ months agoBreast: <12 months agoBreast: 12-23 months agoBreast: 24-35 months agoBreast: 36-47 months agoBreast: 48-83 months agoBreast: 84+ months agoLung/Bronchus: <12 months agoLung/Bronchus: 12-23 months agoLung/Bronchus: 24-35 months agoLung/Bronchus: 36-47 months agoLung/Bronchus: 48-83 months agoLung/Bronchus: 84+ months agoColon: <12 months agoColon: 12-23 months agoColon: 24-35 months agoColon: 36-47 months agoColon: 48-83 months agoColon: 84+ months agoNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: <12 months agoNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 12-23 months agoNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 24-35 months agoNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 36-47 months agoNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 48-83 months agoNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 84+ months agoCorpus Uteri: <12 months agoCorpus Uteri: 12-23 months agoCorpus Uteri: 24-35 months agoCorpus Uteri: 36-47 months agoCorpus Uteri: 48-83 months agoCorpus Uteri: 84+ months agoPancreatic: <12 months agoPancreatic: 12-23 months agoPancreatic: 24-35 months agoPancreatic: 36-47 months agoPancreatic: 48-83 months agoPancreatic: 84+ months agoKidney/Renal Pelvis: <12 months agoKidney/Renal Pelvis: 12-23 months agoKidney/Renal Pelvis: 24-35 months agoKidney/Renal Pelvis: 36-47 months agoKidney/Renal Pelvis: 48-83 months agoKidney/Renal Pelvis: 84+ months agoRectum: <12 months agoRectum: 12-23 months agoRectum: 24-35 months agoRectum: 36-47 months agoRectum: 48-83 months agoRectum: 84+ months agoMelanoma: <12 months agoMelanoma: 12-23 months agoMelanoma: 24-35 months agoMelanoma: 36-47 months agoMelanoma: 48-83 months agoMelanoma: 84+ months ago
Ever User of Pioglitazone5582767511969424247319167324845377545223047267137212616122421142012153621332218194131121018173518881112128101812162422

[back to top]

Number of 10 Most Common Cancer Cases By Dose of Pioglitazone

The 10 most common cancer cases included: prostate, female breast, lung/bronchus, endometrial, colon, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pancreas, kidney/renal pelvis, rectal, and melanoma associated with dose of pioglitazone. The various doses include 1-9000 mg, 9001-25000 mg, 25001-50000 mg and >=50001 mg. (NCT02958956)
Timeframe: 15 years 5 months

InterventionCases (Number)
Prostate: 1-9000 mgProstate: 9001-25000 mgProstate: 25001-50000 mgProstate: >=50001 mgBreast: 1-9000 mgBreast: 9001-25000 mgBreast: 25001-50000 mgBreast: >=50001 mgLung/Bronchus: 1-9000 mgLung/Bronchus: 9001-25000 mgLung/Bronchus: 25001-50000 mgLung/Bronchus: >=50001 mgColon: 1-9000 mgColon: 9001-25000 mgColon: 25001-50000 mgColon: >=50001 mgNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 1-9000 mgNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 9001-25000 mgNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 25001-50000 mgNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: >=50001 mgCorpus Uteri: 1-9000 mgCorpus Uteri: 9001-25000 mgCorpus Uteri: 25001-50000 mgCorpus Uteri: >=50001 mgPancreatic: 1-9000 mgPancreatic: 9001-25000 mgPancreatic: 25001-50000 mgPancreatic: >=50001 mgKidney/Renal Pelvis: 1-9000 mgKidney/Renal Pelvis: 9001-25000 mgKidney/Renal Pelvis: 25001-50000 mgKidney/Renal Pelvis: >=50001 mgRectum: 1-9000 mgRectum: 9001-25000 mgRectum: 25001-50000 mgRectum: >=50001 mgMelanoma: 1-9000 mgMelanoma: 9001-25000 mgMelanoma: 25001-50000 mgMelanoma: >=50001 mg
Ever User of Pioglitazone1291671097192987753908161507270563534442814433819185239383228372322201812928342119

[back to top]

Number of 10 Most Common Cancers Associated Cases

Number of 10 most common cancer cases are reported in this measure: prostate, female breast, lung/bronchus, endometrial, colon, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pancreas, kidney/renal pelvis, rectal, and melanoma. (NCT02958956)
Timeframe: 15 years 5 months

,
InterventionCases (Number)
ProstateBreastLung/BronchusColonNon-Hodgkin LymphomaCorpus UteriPancreaticKidney/Renal PelvisRectumMelanoma
Ever User of Pioglitazone47632028223312011816411059102
Never User of Pioglitazone3307247823001844839799648690570594

[back to top]

Hazard Ratio of the 10 Most Common Cancers Associated With Ever Use of Pioglitazone

The hazard ratio of the 10 most common cancers: prostate, female breast, lung/bronchus, endometrial, colon, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pancreas, kidney/renal pelvis, rectal, and melanoma associated with ever use of pioglitazone. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to provide point and interval estimates of the relative hazard of the 10 most common cancers associated with ever use of pioglitazone. In all regression analyses, these measures of exposure to pioglitazone were treated as time-dependent covariates and time since entry into the cohort was the time scale. (NCT02958956)
Timeframe: 15 years 5 months

InterventionRatio (Number)
ProstateBreastLung/BronchusColonNon-Hodgkin LymphomaCorpus UteriPancreaticKidney/Renal PelvisRectumMelanoma
Full Cohort1.131.001.000.911.000.881.410.950.811.15

[back to top]

Number of 10 Most Common Cancer Cases by Duration of Pioglitazone

The 10 most common cancer cases included: prostate, female breast, lung/bronchus, endometrial, colon, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pancreas, kidney/renal pelvis, rectal, and melanoma associated with duration of pioglitazone. The duration of pioglitazone was categorized as <12 months, 12-23 months, 24-35 months, 36-59 months, 60+ months. (NCT02958956)
Timeframe: 15 years 5 months

InterventionCases (Number)
Prostate: <12 monthsProstate: 12-23 monthsProstate: 24-35 monthsProstate: 36-59 monthsProstate: 60+ monthsBreast: <12 monthsBreast: 12-23 monthsBreast: 24-35 monthsBreast: 36-59 monthsBreast: 60+ monthsLung/Bronchus: <12 monthsLung/Bronchus: 12-23 monthsLung/Bronchus: 24-35 monthsLung/Bronchus: 36-59 monthsLung/Bronchus: 60+ monthsColon: <12 monthsColon: 12-23 monthsColon: 24-35 monthsColon: 36-59 monthsColon: 60+ monthsNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: <12 monthsNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 12-23 monthsNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 24-35 monthsNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 36-59 monthsNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 60+ monthsCorpus Uteri: <12 monthsCorpus Uteri: 12-23 monthsCorpus Uteri: 24-35 monthsCorpus Uteri: 36-59 monthsCorpus Uteri: 60+ monthsPancreatic: <12 monthsPancreatic: 12-23 monthsPancreatic: 24-35 monthsPancreatic: 36-59 monthsPancreatic: 60+ monthsKidney/Renal Pelvis: <12 monthsKidney/Renal Pelvis: 12-23 monthsKidney/Renal Pelvis: 24-35 monthsKidney/Renal Pelvis: 36-59 monthsKidney/Renal Pelvis: 60+ monthsRectum: <12 monthsRectum: 12-23 monthsRectum: 24-35 monthsRectum: 36-59 monthsRectum: 60+ monthsMelanoma: <12 monthsMelanoma: 12-23 monthsMelanoma: 24-35 monthsMelanoma: 36-59 monthsMelanoma: 60+ months
Ever User of Pioglitazone118121729966887547614983604156427248403340353220171643241919135428183625322017231821139882529141420

[back to top]

Hazard Ratio of the 10 Most Common Cancers Associated With Duration of Pioglitazone

The hazard ratio of the 10 most common cancers: prostate, female breast, lung/bronchus, endometrial, colon, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pancreas, kidney/renal pelvis, rectal, and melanoma associated with duration of pioglitazone. The duration of pioglitazone was categorized as <12 months, 12-23 months, 24-35 months, 36-59 months, 60+ months. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to provide point and interval estimates of the cumulative duration. In all regression analyses, these measures of exposure to pioglitazone were treated as time-dependent covariates and time since entry into the cohort was the time scale. (NCT02958956)
Timeframe: 15 years 5 months

InterventionRatio (Number)
Prostate: <12 monthsProstate: 12-23 monthsProstate: 24-35 monthsProstate: 36-59 monthsProstate: 60+ monthsBreast: <12 monthsBreast: 12-23 monthsBreast: 24-35 monthsBreast: 36-59 monthsBreast: 60+ monthsLung/Bronchus: <12 monthsLung/Bronchus: 12-23 monthsLung/Bronchus: 24-35 monthsLung/Bronchus: 36-59 monthsLung/Bronchus: 60+ monthsColon: <12 monthsColon: 12-23 monthsColon: 24-35 monthsColon: 36-59 monthsColon: 60+ monthsNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: <12 monthsNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 12-23 monthsNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 24-35 monthsNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 36-59 monthsNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 60+ monthsCorpus Uteri: <12 monthsCorpus Uteri: 12-23 monthsCorpus Uteri: 24-35 monthsCorpus Uteri: 36-59 monthsCorpus Uteri: 60+ monthsPancreatic: <12 monthsPancreatic: 12-23 monthsPancreatic: 24-35 monthsPancreatic: 36-59 monthsPancreatic: 60+ monthsKidney/Renal Pelvis: <12 monthsKidney/Renal Pelvis: 12-23 monthsKidney/Renal Pelvis: 24-35 monthsKidney/Renal Pelvis: 36-59 monthsKidney/Renal Pelvis: 60+ monthsRectum: <12 monthsRectum: 12-23 monthsRectum: 24-35 monthsRectum: 36-59 monthsRectum: 60+ monthsMelanoma: <12 monthsMelanoma: 12-23 monthsMelanoma: 24-35 monthsMelanoma: 36-59 monthsMelanoma: 60+ months
Full Cohort1.001.301.071.181.160.841.071.011.061.250.900.980.961.061.120.860.881.030.661.050.931.251.080.720.891.010.830.970.780.731.481.191.031.631.530.920.810.960.991.030.870.780.800.580.891.061.591.060.801.46

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Level Over Time

The change between the fasting plasma glucose value collected at Months 3 and 6 relative to baseline. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02989649)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 3 and 6

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Month 3Month 6
Alogliptin or Alogliptin Fixed Dose Combinations (FDCs)-1.058-0.714

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c Level by >0.3% and No Tolerability Findings

Percentage of participants with a decrease of >0.3% from baseline in HbA1c along with no tolerability findings were reported. Tolerability findings included hypoglycemic event, or weight gain ≥5%. (NCT02989649)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alogliptin or Alogliptin Fixed Dose Combinations (FDCs)64.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c Level by <7.0%

Percentage of participants with a decrease of <7.0% from baseline in HbA1c were reported. (NCT02989649)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alogliptin or Alogliptin Fixed Dose Combinations (FDCs)51.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level at Month 6

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at Month 6 relative to baseline. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus is ≥6.5%. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02989649)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Mean)
Alogliptin or Alogliptin Fixed Dose Combinations (FDCs)-1.092

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Over Time

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at Months 3 and 6 relative to baseline. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02989649)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 3 and 6

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Mean)
Month 3Month 6
Alogliptin or Alogliptin Fixed Dose Combinations (FDCs)-1.022-1.092

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Remain on Treatment With Alogliptin or Alogliptin FDCs

(NCT02989649)
Timeframe: Months 3 and 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 3Month 6
Alogliptin or Alogliptin Fixed Dose Combinations (FDCs)100100

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

An ADR is defined as any response to a medicinal product that is noxious and unintended and that occurs at doses normally used in humans for the prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of diseases or for the restoration, correction, or modification of physiological function. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically important due to other reasons than the above mentioned criteria. Adverse events such as pancreatitis, hepatic disorders, and hypersensitivity reactions (including angioedema, anaphylaxis, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome) were considered as AESI. (NCT02989649)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI)
Alogliptin or Alogliptin Fixed Dose Combinations (FDCs)100

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level at Month 6 in Subgroups of Participants With Different Clinical Characteristics

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at Month 6 relative to baseline. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus is ≥6.5%. Subgroups included participants with different baseline clinical characteristics with predictors such as prior therapy of diabetes mellitus, sex, age group, cardiovascular risk group, therapy type (monotherapy or combined therapy), baseline body mass index (BMI) and initial glycemic control. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02989649)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Mean)
Prior Therapy of Diabetes Mellitus, Ever UsedPrior Therapy of Diabetes Mellitus, Never UsedSex, MaleSex, FemaleAge, <45 yearsAge, >=45 to <65 yearsAge,>=65 yearsCardiovascular Risk Group, YesCardiovascular Risk Group, NoTherapy Type, MonotherapyTherapy Type, Combined TherapyBaseline BMI, <25 kg/m^2Baseline BMI, 25 to <30 kg/m^2Baseline BMI, >=30 kg/m^2Initial Glycemic Control, <7%Initial Glycemic Control, >=7%
Alogliptin or Alogliptin Fixed Dose Combinations (FDCs)-1.154-0.882-1.055-1.150-1.658-1.370-0.203-1.100-1.092-1.032-1.106-1.101-1.037-1.342-0.046-1.525

[back to top]

Coronary Artery Bypass [Coronary Revascularization]

Number of Participants with revascularization coronary procedures (coronary artery bypass grafting) (NCT03011775)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline1 year
Pioglitazone + Standard Care00
Standard Care00

[back to top]

Сardiovascular Death

Number of Participants with cardiovascular death (NCT03011775)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline1 year
Pioglitazone + Standard Care00
Standard Care00

[back to top]

Systemic Inflammation Level

Number of Participants with C-reactive protein level above 3 mg/L (NCT03011775)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineIn 1 year
Pioglitazone + Standard Care1012
Standard Care713

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability 4

Kidneys injury: mean values of creatinine (NCT03011775)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

,
Interventionμmol/l (Mean)
Mean values of creatinine in men baselineMean values of creatinine in men in 1 yearMean values of creatinine in women baselineMean values of creatinine in women in 1 year
Pioglitazone + Standard Care105.685.066.872.5
Standard Care102.382.088.277.5

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability 3

Kidney injury: mean values of the microalbuminuria (NCT03011775)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

,
Interventionmg/mol (Mean)
Baseline1 year
Pioglitazone + Standard Care31.4431.10
Standard Care41.137.70

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability 2

Liver injury: mean levels of total bilirubin (NCT03011775)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 month and 1 year

,
Interventionμmol/l (Mean)
BaselineMean values of total bilirubin in 6 monthMean values of total bilirubin in 1 year
Pioglitazone + Standard Care12.312.415.7
Standard Care10.812.715.0

[back to top]

Diameter of Stenosis [Carotic Atherosclerotic Lesions]

Mean diameters of the stenosis of the right and left common carotid arteries (NCT03011775)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
Mean diameter of the stenosis of the right common carotid artery baselineMean diameter of the stenosis of the right common carotid artery in 1 yearMean diameter of the stenosis of the left common carotid artery baselineMean diameter of the stenosis of the left common carotid artery in 1 year
Pioglitazone + Standard Care9.85.011.64.1
Standard Care8.74.810.15.6

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability 1

Liver injury: mean values of ALT (NCT03011775)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 month and 1 year

,
Interventionunits per liter (U/L) (Mean)
BaselineMean values of ALT in 6 monthsMean values of ALT in 1 year
Pioglitazone + Standard Care23.427.419.9
Standard Care26.926.123.9

[back to top]

Thickness of the Intima-media Complex

Mean thickness of carotid intima-media complex (NCT03011775)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 month and 1 year

,
Interventioncm (Mean)
Mean thickness of the right carotid intima-media baselineMean thickness of the right carotid intima-media in 6 monthMean thickness of the right carotid intima-media in 1 yearMean thickness of the left carotid intima-media baselineMean thickness of the left carotid intima-media in 6 monthMean thickness of the left carotid intima-media in 1 year
Pioglitazone + Standard Care1.081.051.011.11.061.02
Standard Care0.980.971.011.01.000.97

[back to top]

Level of Insulin Resistance 2

Mean levels of blood glucose (NCT03011775)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
BaselineIn 6 month
Pioglitazone + Standard Care6.05.97
Standard Care5.95.60

[back to top]

Lipid Metabolism 3

Lipoproteine fractions:mean values of high-density lipoproteins and low density lipoproteins (NCT03011775)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Mean values of high-density lipoproteins in men baselineMean values of high-density lipoproteins in men in 1 yearMean values of high-density lipoproteins in women baselineMean values of high-density lipoproteins in women in 1 yearMean values of low density lipoproteins in men baselineMean values of low density lipoproteins in men in 1 yearMean values of low density lipoproteins in women baselineMean values of low density lipoproteins in women in 1 year
Pioglitazone + Standard Care0.81.10.91.23.92.94.53.3
Standard Care0.91.01.11.04.43.03.52.7

[back to top]

Lipid Metabolism 2

Mean values of the triglyceride levels (NCT03011775)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 month and 1 year

,
Intervention1 mmol/L (Mean)
Mean values of triglyceride baselineMean values of triglyceride in 6 monthMean values of triglyceride in 1 year
Pioglitazone + Standard Care0.690.720.9
Standard Care0.610.730.7

[back to top]

Lipid Metabolism 1

Mean levels of total serum cholesterol (NCT03011775)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 month and 1 year

,
Interventionmmol / l (Mean)
Mean values of the total cholesterol level baselineMean values of the total cholesterol level in 6 monthMean values of the total cholesterol level in 1 year
Pioglitazone + Standard Care5.274.54.5
Standard Care5.284.34.3

[back to top]

Cardiovascular Hospitalization

Number of Participants with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or unstable angina (UA) (NCT03011775)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline1 year
Pioglitazone + Standard Care00
Standard Care00

[back to top]

Carotic Atherosclerotic Lesions

Number of Participants with presence of atherosclerotic plaque of the intima media of common carotid artery greater than 1.4 mm (NCT03011775)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline1 year
Pioglitazone + Standard Care00
Standard Care00

[back to top]

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [Coronary Revascularization]

Number of Participants with incidence of percutaneous coronary intervention. (NCT03011775)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline1 year
Pioglitazone + Standard Care00
Standard Care00

[back to top]

Level of Insulin Resistance 1

Oral glucose tolerance test: number of Participants with impaired glucose tolerance (NCT03011775)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Number of Participants with glucose level in the range of 7.8 to 11 mmol/L baselineNumber of Participants with glucose level in the range of 7.8 to 11 mmol/L in 6 monthNumber of Participants with glucose level above 11 mmol/L baselineNumber of Participants with glucose level above 11 mmol/L in 6 month
Pioglitazone + Standard Care713105
Standard Care141643

[back to top]

Hormonal Profiles

Serum level of LH was measure at baseline and after 3 months of treatment (NCT03117517)
Timeframe: Baseine and after 3 Months

,
InterventionmIU/ml (Geometric Mean)
LH level at baselineLH level after treatment
Metformin5.794.92
Metformin, Pioglitazone6.6255.16

[back to top]

Cytokines and Chemokines Measurements

IL-6 and IL-8 levels by ELISA method using commercially available kits. (NCT03117517)
Timeframe: Baseline and after 3 Months

,
Interventionpg/ml (Geometric Mean)
IL-6 levels at baselineIL-6 levels after 3 months of treatmentIL-8 Llevels at baselineIL-8 Llevels after treatment
Metformin14.6012.6561.9232.70
Metformin, Pioglitazone14.1211.1241.8622.00

[back to top]

Insulin Resistance

Insulin resistance was measure by calculating HOMA-IR from the data of insulin and sugar levels. (NCT03117517)
Timeframe: Baseline and after 3 months

,
Interventionunitless (Mean)
HOMA-IR at baselineHOMA-IR after treatment
Metformin7.193.97
Metformin, Pioglitazone6.223.84

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Alogliptin and Pioglitazone

(NCT03501277)
Timeframe: Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 72 hours) post-dose

,,,
Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/ml) (Geometric Mean)
AlogliptinPioglitazone
Regimen A165.3678.3
Regimen B154.9706.5
Regimen C162.31052.1
Regimen D157.41141.5

[back to top]

AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for Alogliptin and Pioglitazone

(NCT03501277)
Timeframe: Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 72 hours) post-dose

,,,
Interventionhour*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
AlogliptinPioglitazone
Regimen A2197.35726.0
Regimen B2163.45471.9
Regimen C2194.710141.6
Regimen D2195.09907.6

[back to top]

Change in Stress-reactivity as Assessed by Self-report on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

The visual analogue scale (VAS) ranges from 0-10, with a higher score indicating higher stress. (NCT03860753)
Timeframe: baseline, week 4

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pioglitazone-1.33

[back to top]

Change in Stress-reactivity as Assessed by Heart Rate Change During the Cold Pressor Task (CPT)

The cold pressor task (CPT) a stress-inducer in human laboratory studies that elicits moderate activation of the sympathetic nervous system and limited activation of the HPA-axis. During CPT, participants will submerge their dominant arm in an ice-water bath for up to 2 minutes, and heart rate will be measured before and after CPT. The heart rate change for each time point is calculated as heart rate after CPT minus the heart rate before CPT. This outcome measure reports the heart rate change at week 4 minus the heart rate change at baseline. (NCT03860753)
Timeframe: baseline, week 4

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Pioglitazone-4.67

[back to top]

Change in Stress-reactivity as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure Change During the Cold Pressor Task (CPT)

The cold pressor task (CPT) a stress-inducer in human laboratory studies that elicits moderate activation of the sympathetic nervous system and limited activation of the HPA-axis. During CPT, participants will submerge their dominant arm in an ice-water bath for up to 2 minutes, and blood pressure will be measured before and after CPT. The blood pressure change for each time point is calculated as blood pressure after CPT minus the blood pressure before CPT. This outcome measure reports the blood pressure change at week 4 minus the blood pressure change at baseline. (NCT03860753)
Timeframe: baseline, week 4

Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Pioglitazone-7.67

[back to top]

Change in Stress-reactivity as Assessed by Change in Systolic Blood Pressure During the Cold Pressor Task (CPT)

The cold pressor task (CPT) a stress-inducer in human laboratory studies that elicits moderate activation of the sympathetic nervous system and limited activation of the HPA-axis. During CPT, participants will submerge their dominant arm in an ice-water bath for up to 2 minutes, and blood pressure will be measured before and after CPT. The blood pressure change for each time point is calculated as blood pressure after CPT minus the blood pressure before CPT. This outcome measure reports the blood pressure change at week 4 minus the blood pressure change at baseline. (NCT03860753)
Timeframe: baseline, week 4

Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Pioglitazone-2.67

[back to top]

Change in Alcohol Use as Indicated by Self Report Using the Alcohol Timeline Followback (TLFB)

The Alcohol Timeline Followback (TLFB) is a drinking assessment method that obtains an estimate of daily drinking. Participants provide a retrospective estimate of the number of drinks per week for the last seven days. (NCT03860753)
Timeframe: baseline, week 4

Interventionnumber of drinks per week (Mean)
Pioglitazone-13.38

[back to top]

Change in Alcohol Craving as Assessed by Self Report Using the The Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS).

The Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) is a 5-item questionnaire that measures an individual's craving to drink alcohol in the past week. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 6, with a total score range of 0 to 30. A higher score indicates greater level of alcohol craving. (NCT03860753)
Timeframe: baseline, week 4

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Pioglitazone-8.5

[back to top]

Change in Stress-reactivity as Assessed by Salivary Cortisol Level Change During the Cold Pressor Task (CPT)

The cold pressor task (CPT) a stress-inducer in human laboratory studies that elicits moderate activation of the sympathetic nervous system and limited activation of the HPA-axis. During CPT, participants will submerge their dominant arm in an ice-water bath for up to 2 minutes, and salivary cortisol level will be measured before and after CPT. The salivary cortisol level change for each time point is calculated as salivary cortisol level after CPT minus the salivary cortisol level before CPT. This outcome measure reports the salivary cortisol level change at week 4 minus the salivary cortisol level change at baseline. (NCT03860753)
Timeframe: baseline, week 4

Interventionpicograms per milliliter (pg/mL) (Mean)
Pioglitazone-108.07

[back to top]