Page last updated: 2024-11-08

maleic acid

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Occurs in Manufacturing Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

maleic acid: RN given refers to parent cpd(Z)-isomer which is maleic acid; all RR's given refer to (Z)-isomer; (E)-isomer is fumaric acid [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

maleic acid : A butenedioic acid in which the double bond has cis- (Z)-configuration. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID444266
CHEMBL ID539648
CHEBI ID18300
SCHEMBL ID613
MeSH IDM0095873

Synonyms (137)

Synonym
2-butenedioic acid, (z)-
(z)-butenedioic acid
h2male
(2z)-but-2-enedioate
CHEBI:18300 ,
cis-but-2-enedioic acid
wln: qv1u1vq-c
nsc25940
nsc-25940
butenedioic acid, (z)-
2-butenedioic acid (z)-
cis-1,2-ethylenedicarboxylic acid
(z)-2-butenedioic acid
1, (z)
toxilic acid
MAE ,
2-butenedioic acid
2-butenedioic acid, (2z)-
(2z)-but-2-enedioic acid
ccris 1115
malenic acid
hsdb 666
malezid cm
2-butenedioic acid (2z)- (9ci)
scotchbond multipurpose etchant
ai3-01002
cis-2-butenedioic acid
maleic acid (8ci)
maleic acid [na2215] [corrosive]
1,2-ethylenedicarboxylic acid, (z)
maleinic acid
2-butenedioic acid (2z)-
NCGC00090970-01
einecs 203-742-5
na2215
kyselina maleinova [czech]
brn 0605762
nsc 25940
C01384
cis-butenedioic acid
110-16-7
maleic acid
maleic acid, reagentplus(r), >=99.0% (hplc)
1TOK
1AHY
DB04299
smr001230824
MLS002153468
3B685B85-C1F3-4E32-9DBC-3854162A8DE1
AKOS000268822
CHEMBL539648
BMSE000212
(2z)-2-butenedioate
M0006
A802156
NCGC00090970-02
NCGC00091192-02
dtxsid8021517 ,
tox21_303045
NCGC00257215-01
cas-110-16-7
dtxcid201517
tox21_113105
NCGC00259742-01
tox21_202193
HMS2236F09
maleic acid [nf]
maleic acid [na2215] [corrosive]
unii-91xw058u2c
kyselina maleinova
91xw058u2c ,
ec 203-742-5
4-02-00-02199 (beilstein handbook reference)
68307-91-5
26099-09-2
maleic acid [usp impurity]
maleic acid [ep monograph]
maleic acid [inci]
maleic acid [usp-rs]
maleic acid [mart.]
malic acid impurity b [ep impurity]
maleic acid [mi]
sodium aurothiomalate impurity a [ep impurity]
maleic acid [ii]
maleic acid [hsdb]
maleic acid [who-dd]
S3086
SCHEMBL613
NCGC00090970-03
tox21_113105_1
maleic-acid
bis-hydrogen maleate
(z)-2-butenedioate
butenedioic acid,(z)-
(2z)-2-butenedioic acid #
1,2-ethylenedicarboxylic acid, cis-
J-610085
STR03481
mfcd00063177
(2z)-2-butenedioic acid
J-521667
F2191-0240
maleic acid, standard for quantitative nmr, tracecert(r)
maleic acid, tested according to ph.eur.
maleic acid, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
maleic acid, saj special grade, >=99.0%
maleic acid, 99%
maleic acid, vetec(tm) reagent grade, 98%
maleic acid, for synthesis, 99%
maleic acid, pharmaceutical secondary standard; certified reference material
maleic acid, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
gtpl9630
2-butenedioate
cis-but-2-enedioate
cis-2-butenedioate
cis-butenedioate
(2z)-butene-2-dioate
(2z)-butene-2-dioic acid
(z)-butenedioate
maleic acid [na2215]
CS-0015079
HY-Y0367
1-(o-tolyl)piperazinehydrochloride
Q42038
EN300-305309
(z)-1,2-ethylenedicarboxylic acid
malic acid impurity b (ep impurity)
1,2-ethylenedicarboxylic acid, (z)-
maleic acid (ii)
cis-maleic acid
maleic acid (ep monograph)
cis-ethylene-1,2-dicarboxylic acid
maleic acid (usp-rs)
maleic acid (mart.)
maleic acid (usp impurity)
sodium aurothiomalate impurity a (ep impurity)
(z)-but-2-ene-1,4-dioic acid

Research Excerpts

Overview

Maleic acid is a multi-functional chemical widely applied in the manufacturing of polymer products including food packaging. Maleic Acid is a dicarboxylic acid that functions as a fragrance ingredient and pH adjuster in cosmetics - it is used in a few cosmetic product formulations at low concentrations.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Maleic acid is an industrial-grade chemical that is often used in adhesives, stabilizers, and preservatives. "( Proteomic analysis of rat kidney under maleic acid treatment by SWATH-MS technology.
Chen, HC; Chien, HJ; Lai, CC; Wu, KY; Xue, YT, 2020
)
2.27
"Maleic acid is an effective irrigant that can remove the smear layer, open dentinal tubules, and act as a high-efficiency final irrigant in activation protocols."( Effect of maleic acid on the bond strength of fibre posts to root dentine.
Dai, P; Fan, F; He, B; Huang, S; Ibrahim, M; Ma, J; Mao, Y; Wu, G, 2017
)
1.58
"Maleic acid is a multi-functional chemical widely applied in the manufacturing of polymer products including food packaging. "( An in silico toxicogenomics approach for inferring potential diseases associated with maleic acid.
Lin, YC; Tung, CW; Wang, CC, 2014
)
2.07
"Maleic Acid is a dicarboxylic acid that functions as a fragrance ingredient and pH adjuster in cosmetics - it is used in a few cosmetic product formulations at low concentrations. "( Final report on the safety assessment of Maleic Acid.
, 2007
)
2.05

Effects

Mealyic acid has been used as an etchant or non-rinse conditioner in adhesive dentistry. Maleic acid (MA) has been shown to induce Fanconi syndrome via disturbance of renal energy homeostasis, though the underlying pathomechanism is still under debate.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Maleic acid (MA), which has been reported to be highly excreted in propionic acidemia (PAcidemia), was demonstrated to cause nephropathy by bioenergetics impairment and oxidative stress, but the effects on kidney mitochondrial respiration has not yet been properly investigated. "( Experimental evidence that maleic acid markedly compromises glutamate oxidation through inhibition of glutamate dehydrogenase and α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase activities in kidney of developing rats.
Amaral, AU; Camera, FD; Castilho, RF; Cecatto, C; Roginski, AC; Wajner, M; Wajner, SM, 2019
)
2.25
"Maleic acid (MA) has been shown to induce Fanconi syndrome via disturbance of renal energy homeostasis, though the underlying pathomechanism is still under debate. "( Maleic Acid--but Not Structurally Related Methylmalonic Acid--Interrupts Energy Metabolism by Impaired Calcium Homeostasis.
Kölker, S; Morath, MA; Okun, JG; Ruppert, T; Sauer, SW; Tuncel, AT; Wang, BT, 2015
)
3.3
"Maleic acid has been shown to be used as a food adulterant in the production of modified starch by the Taiwan Food and Drug Administration. "( Pharmacokinetics of Maleic Acid as a Food Adulterant Determined by Microdialysis in Rat Blood and Kidney Cortex.
Hou, ML; Lin, CH; Lin, LC; Lu, CM; Tsai, TH, 2016
)
2.2
"Maleic acid has recently been proposed as an alternative irrigant to EDTA given its better smear layer removal and biocompatibility; however, its antimicrobial activity is not known."( Antimicrobial activity of maleic acid and combinations of cetrimide with chelating agents against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm.
Arias-Moliz, MT; Baca, P; Ferrer-Luque, CM; González-Rodríguez, MP, 2010
)
1.38
"Maleic acid has been used as an etchant or non-rinse conditioner in adhesive dentistry. "( Evidence of chemisorption of maleic acid to enamel and hydroxyapatite.
Fu, B; Hannig, M; Qian, W; Shen, Q; Sun, X; Yuan, J, 2004
)
2.06

Actions

Malianic acid is able to inhibit the GAD of L.monocytogenes significantly enhancing its sensitivity to acidic conditions. Maleic acid did not cause increased permeability of the proximal tubule to either inulin or HCO3-.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Maleic acid is able to inhibit the GAD of L. monocytogenes significantly enhancing its sensitivity to acidic conditions and together with its ability to remove biofilms, make a good candidate for disinfection regimes."( A novel approach in acidic disinfection through inhibition of acid resistance mechanisms; Maleic acid-mediated inhibition of glutamate decarboxylase activity enhances acid sensitivity of Listeria monocytogenes.
Barnes, RH; Karatzas, KAG; Paudyal, R, 2018
)
1.42
"Thus maleic acid did not cause increased permeability of the proximal tubule to either inulin or HCO3-."( Microperfusion study of proximal tubule bicarbonate transport in maleic acid-induced renal tubular acidosis.
Aynedjian, HS; Bank, N; Mutz, BF, 1986
)
0.96

Treatment

Mealic acid pretreatment was very effective for attaining high glucose yields after enzymatic hydrolysis. In maleic acid-treated rats the site and extent of tubular necrosis and the nature of urinary loss of solutes were studied.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The maleic acid pretreated biomass, which included 17.5% of the phenolic OH group, was very effective for attaining high glucose yields and ethanol yield, after simultaneous saccharification and fermentation."( Structural properties of pretreated biomass from different acid pretreatments and their effects on simultaneous saccharification and ethanol fermentation.
Choi, IG; Choi, JW; Kim, HY; Kim, JY; Lee, JW; Lim, WS, 2013
)
0.87
"Maleic acid pretreatment was very effective for attaining high glucose yields after enzymatic hydrolysis."( Effects of pretreatment factors on fermentable sugar production and enzymatic hydrolysis of mixed hardwood.
Lee, JW; Lim, WS, 2013
)
1.11
"In maleic acid-treated rats the site and extent of tubular necrosis and the nature of urinary loss of solutes were studied."( Urinary loss of glucose, phosphate, and protein by diffusion into proximal straight tubules injured by D-serine and maleic acid.
Carone, FA; Goldman, B; Nakamura, S, 1985
)
0.99
"maleic acid-treated rats."( Microperfusion study of proximal tubule bicarbonate transport in maleic acid-induced renal tubular acidosis.
Aynedjian, HS; Bank, N; Mutz, BF, 1986
)
1.23

Toxicity

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Complete blood counts, liver function test, and cardiac histology showed no sign of adverse effects for intravenous doses of the micellar preparation."( Copoly(styrene-maleic acid)-pirarubicin micelles: high tumor-targeting efficiency with little toxicity.
Fang, J; Greish, K; Maeda, H; Nagamitsu, A,
)
0.48
"This study for the first time, clearly demonstrated the significantly less toxic effect of MA at a comparable dose of EDTA, suggesting its potential for use as root canal irrigant."( A comparative in vitro evaluation of cytotoxic effects of EDTA and maleic acid: root canal irrigants.
Ballal, NV; Bhat, S; Kundabala, M; Rao, BS; Rao, N, 2009
)
0.59
" An understanding of structure-activity relationships (SARs) of chemicals can make a significant contribution to the identification of potential toxic effects early in the drug development process and aid in avoiding such problems."( Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
Fisk, L; Greene, N; Naven, RT; Note, RR; Patel, ML; Pelletier, DJ, 2010
)
0.36
" The composites generally exhibit low acute toxicity, with values below the levels considered to have direct ecotoxic effect on aquatic ecosystems (<2 toxic units)."( Ecotoxicity and fungal deterioration of recycled polypropylene/wood composites: effect of wood content and coupling.
Burgstaller, C; Keledi, G; López, MJ; Moreno, J; Pukánszky, B; Suárez-Estrella, F; Sudár, A; Vargas-García, MC, 2013
)
0.39

Pharmacokinetics

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The pharmacokinetic results demonstrated that maleic acid produced a linear pharmacokinetic phenomenon within the doses of 10 and 30 mg/kg."( Pharmacokinetics of Maleic Acid as a Food Adulterant Determined by Microdialysis in Rat Blood and Kidney Cortex.
Hou, ML; Lin, CH; Lin, LC; Lu, CM; Tsai, TH, 2016
)
1.01
" Due to limited data on the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of ingested MA, we studied pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters in serum and urine of Sprague Dawley rats."( Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of oral single-dose maleic acid in biofluids of Sprague-Dawley rats.
Chen, HC; Chiang, SY; Luo, YS; Wu, C; Wu, KY, 2016
)
0.68
" Five pharmaceutically acceptable salts, including the maleate (2), fumarate (3), citrate (4, 5), and l-malate (6) of compound 1, were prepared via the salt formation reaction and evaluated for their physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties."( Solubility-driven optimization of benzothiopyranone salts leading to a preclinical candidate with improved pharmacokinetic properties and activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Fu, L; Gong, N; Guo, K; Huang, H; Li, G; Li, P; Lu, Y; Ma, C; Wang, B; Zhang, B, 2023
)
0.91

Bioavailability

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The investigation was undertaken with the objective of comparing two in vitro techniques, measuring dialyzable iron (method A) and measuring ionizable iron (method B), for iron bioavailability in a model system."( Comparative analysis of influence of promoters and inhibitors on in vitro available iron using two methods.
Gupta, S; Jyothi Lakshmi, A; Prakash, J,
)
0.13
" Bioavailability of the formulations was tested in dogs."( In vivo predictive mini-scale dissolution for weak bases: Advantages of pH-shift in combination with an absorptive compartment.
Fleth, J; Frank, KJ; Locher, K; Wagner, KG; Zecevic, DE, 2014
)
0.4
"Drug delivery systems could potentially overcome low bioavailability and gastrointestinal toxicity, which are the major challenges for the development of oral anticancer drugs."( Styrene maleic acid micelles as a nanocarrier system for oral anticancer drug delivery - dual uptake through enterocytes and M-cells.
Greish, K; Müller, P; Nehoff, H; Parayath, NN; Taurin, S, 2015
)
0.85
" Due to limited data on the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of ingested MA, we studied pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters in serum and urine of Sprague Dawley rats."( Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of oral single-dose maleic acid in biofluids of Sprague-Dawley rats.
Chen, HC; Chiang, SY; Luo, YS; Wu, C; Wu, KY, 2016
)
0.68
"An advanced oral drug delivery system that can effectively deliver drugs with poor oral bioavailability is strongly desirable."( Multifunctional Nanotube-Mucoadhesive Poly(methyl vinyl ether-co-maleic acid)@Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose Acetate Succinate Composite for Site-Specific Oral Drug Delivery.
Airavaara, M; Correia, A; Ding, Y; Hirvonen, J; Kemell, M; Kerdsakundee, N; Li, W; Liu, Z; Martins, JP; Santos, HA; Wiwattanapatapee, R; Zhang, F, 2017
)
0.69
"To prepare nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) loaded with asenapine maleate (ASPM) to increase its oral bioavailability by intestinal lymphatic uptake."( Asenapine maleate-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers: optimization and in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo evaluations.
Al-Jamal, KT; Faruqu, FN; Jain, S; Kushwah, V; Managuli, RS; Mutalik, S; Raut, SY; Shreya, AB; Wang, JT, 2019
)
0.51
" ASPM-NLCs showed greater cellular uptake, superior preclinical oral bioavailability and higher efficacy in reducing the L-DOPA-carbidopa-induced locomotor count compared with plain drug."( Asenapine maleate-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers: optimization and in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo evaluations.
Al-Jamal, KT; Faruqu, FN; Jain, S; Kushwah, V; Managuli, RS; Mutalik, S; Raut, SY; Shreya, AB; Wang, JT, 2019
)
0.51
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
"012mg/ml 23oC) and low oral bioavailability (about 35-65% for a once 10mg dose)."( Dissolution rate enhancement of new co-crystals of ezetimibe with maleic acid and isonicotinamide.
Kai, S; Li Na, D; Ling, F; Man, Z; Wen, L; Xiao-Hui, Z; Yan-Jie, H; Yu-Zhen, Y, 2019
)
0.75
" Compared with 1, all the target salts exhibited greatly increased aqueous solubility and improved oral bioavailability in mice."( Solubility-driven optimization of benzothiopyranone salts leading to a preclinical candidate with improved pharmacokinetic properties and activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Fu, L; Gong, N; Guo, K; Huang, H; Li, G; Li, P; Lu, Y; Ma, C; Wang, B; Zhang, B, 2023
)
0.91

Dosage Studied

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Na maleate, given at a dosage of 2 mM/kg body weight 2 h prior to micropuncture, inhibited tubular albumin uptake in the proximal convoluted tubule."( Renal albumin reabsorption in normal and sodium maleate-treated rats.
Arbesman, H; Cho, J; Galaske, RG; Van Liew, JB, 1985
)
0.27
"A rapid and specific nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopic method was developed for determining dicyclomine hydrochloride in tablet, capsule, and injection dosage forms."( Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic determination of dicyclomine hydrochloride in tablet, capsule, and injection dosage forms.
Hanna, GM,
)
0.13
" The induction of maleic acid-related nephrotoxicity in dogs may confound the interpretation of toxicologic studies of maleic acid salts of basic pharmaceutics, if the dosage of test article results in the delivery of dosages of maleic acid > or = 9 mg/kg."( Nephrotoxicity of pravadoline maleate (WIN 48098-6) in dogs: evidence of maleic acid-induced acute tubular necrosis.
Benziger, DP; Bradford, JC; Descotes, G; Everett, RM; Greener, Y; Rollin, M; Ward, SJ, 1993
)
0.85
" The temporal pattern of ROS production can be used to improve future dosing regimens."( Styrene maleic acid copolymer-pirarubicin induces tumor-selective oxidative stress and decreases tumor hypoxia as possible treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases.
Christophi, C; Daruwalla, J; Greish, K; Maeda, H; Malcontenti-Wilson, C; Muralidharan, V, 2015
)
0.85
"Ethionamide (ETH), a Biopharmaceutics Classification System class II drug, is a second-line drug manufactured as an oral dosage form by Pfizer to treat tuberculosis."( Mechanochemistry applied to reformulation and scale-up production of Ethionamide: Salt selection and solubility enhancement.
da Silva, CC; de Melo, CC; Ellena, J; Pereira, CC; Rosa, PC, 2016
)
0.43
" On the basis of preliminary results, no subacute toxicity was observed in major organs, tissues and hematological system up to a dosage of 60 mg/kg body weight in mice."( pH-Sensitive Biocompatible Nanoparticles of Paclitaxel-Conjugated Poly(styrene-co-maleic acid) for Anticancer Drug Delivery in Solid Tumors of Syngeneic Mice.
Dalela, M; Kharbanda, S; Shrivastav, TG; Singh, H, 2015
)
0.64
" Sprague-Dawley rats (225 to 250 g) were divided into three dosing groups, and polymyxin B was administered (5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, and 20 mg/kg) subcutaneously once daily."( Role of Renal Drug Exposure in Polymyxin B-Induced Nephrotoxicity.
Babic, JT; Ledesma, KR; Manchandani, P; Tam, VH; Truong, LD; Zhou, J, 2017
)
0.46
"Herein, we report on a quantitative analysis of zinc gluconate in the authentic form in presence of vitamin C, and the method was applied to their dosage form (Utozinc® tablets)."( Quantitative 1HNMR Spectroscopy: Analysis of Zinc Gluconate in Utozinc® Tablets, a Mixture of Zinc Gluconate and Vitamin C.
Hassan, AEA; Hassan, MH, 2022
)
0.72
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Occurs in Manufacturing (2 Items)

ItemProcessFrequency
Groceriescore-ingredient1
Condimentscore-ingredient1

Roles (3)

RoleDescription
plant metaboliteAny eukaryotic metabolite produced during a metabolic reaction in plants, the kingdom that include flowering plants, conifers and other gymnosperms.
algal metaboliteAny eukaryotic metabolite produced during a metabolic reaction in algae including unicellular organisms like chlorella and diatoms to multicellular organisms like giant kelps and brown algae.
mouse metaboliteAny mammalian metabolite produced during a metabolic reaction in a mouse (Mus musculus).
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (1)

ClassDescription
butenedioic acid
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (22)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, JmjC domain-containing histone demethylation protein 3AHomo sapiens (human)Potency89.12510.631035.7641100.0000AID504339
thyroid stimulating hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.03160.001318.074339.8107AID926; AID938
progesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency19.33120.000417.946075.1148AID1346795
retinoic acid nuclear receptor alpha variant 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency63.25030.003041.611522,387.1992AID1159552
pregnane X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.43370.005428.02631,258.9301AID1346982
cellular tumor antigen p53 isoform aHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.00790.316212.443531.6228AID924
transcriptional regulator ERG isoform 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency5.62340.794321.275750.1187AID624246
nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency66.82420.000627.21521,122.0200AID651741
gemininHomo sapiens (human)Potency1.37900.004611.374133.4983AID624296; AID624297
Interferon betaHomo sapiens (human)Potency3.32940.00339.158239.8107AID1347407
Integrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.00790.316211.415731.6228AID924
Integrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.00790.316211.415731.6228AID924
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, Aspartate AminotransferaseEscherichia coliKd440.0000120.0000280.0000440.0000AID977611
Chain B, Aspartate AminotransferaseEscherichia coliKd440.0000120.0000280.0000440.0000AID977611
Chain A, Aspartate AminotransferaseEscherichia coliKd440.0000120.0000280.0000440.0000AID977611
Chain B, Aspartate AminotransferaseEscherichia coliKd440.0000120.0000280.0000440.0000AID977611
Chain A, Aspartate aminotransferaseEscherichia coliKd3,400.000090.00001,125.00003,400.0000AID977611
Chain B, Aspartate aminotransferaseEscherichia coliKd3,400.000090.00001,125.00003,400.0000AID977611
Chain A, Aspartate aminotransferaseEscherichia coliKd3,400.000090.00001,125.00003,400.0000AID977611
Chain A, Aspartate aminotransferaseEscherichia coliKd3,400.000090.00001,125.00003,400.0000AID977611
Chain A, Aspartate aminotransferaseEscherichia coliKd3,400.000090.00001,125.00003,400.0000AID977611
Chain B, Aspartate aminotransferaseEscherichia coliKd3,400.000090.00001,125.00003,400.0000AID977611
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (100)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of autophagyInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylation of STAT proteinInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interferon-betaInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell proliferationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of viral genome replicationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of MHC class I biosynthetic processInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of Lewy body formationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T-helper 2 cell cytokine productionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
T cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
humoral immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of low-density lipoprotein receptor activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein phosphorylationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of endothelial cell proliferationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell-matrix adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell-substrate junction assemblyIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell-matrix adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
integrin-mediated signaling pathwayIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
embryo implantationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
blood coagulationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of endothelial cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of macrophage derived foam cell differentiationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fibroblast migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of lipid storageIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
smooth muscle cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
platelet activationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling pathwayIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell-substrate adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
activation of protein kinase activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of lipid transportIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein localizationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of actin cytoskeleton organizationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell adhesion mediated by integrinIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell adhesion mediated by integrinIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of osteoblast proliferationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
heterotypic cell-cell adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
substrate adhesion-dependent cell spreadingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
tube developmentIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
wound healing, spreading of epidermal cellsIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to platelet-derived growth factor stimulusIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
apolipoprotein A-I-mediated signaling pathwayIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
wound healingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
apoptotic cell clearanceIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of bone resorptionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of angiogenesisIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bone resorptionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
symbiont entry into host cellIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
platelet-derived growth factor receptor signaling pathwayIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fibroblast proliferationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
mesodermal cell differentiationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of lipoprotein metabolic processIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative chemotaxisIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosolIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of serotonin uptakeIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
angiogenesis involved in wound healingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascadeIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
platelet aggregationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to mechanical stimulusIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of glomerular mesangial cell proliferationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
blood coagulation, fibrin clot formationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
maintenance of postsynaptic specialization structureIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic neurotransmitter receptor internalizationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic neurotransmitter receptor diffusion trappingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of substrate adhesion-dependent cell spreadingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of adenylate cyclase-inhibiting opioid receptor signaling pathwayIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of trophoblast cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of extracellular matrix organizationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to insulin-like growth factor stimulusIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of endothelial cell apoptotic processIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of leukocyte migrationIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
cell-matrix adhesionIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
integrin-mediated signaling pathwayIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
angiogenesisIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
cell-cell adhesionIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
cell adhesion mediated by integrinIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (25)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
cytokine activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
chloramphenicol O-acetyltransferase activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
fibroblast growth factor bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
C-X3-C chemokine bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
insulin-like growth factor I bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
neuregulin bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
virus receptor activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
fibronectin bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein disulfide isomerase activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase C bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
platelet-derived growth factor receptor bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
integrin bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
coreceptor activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell adhesion molecule bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular matrix bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
fibrinogen bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular matrix bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
molecular adaptor activityIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
fibrinogen bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
integrin bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (32)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
extracellular spaceInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapseIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell-cell junctionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
platelet alpha granule membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
lamellipodium membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
filopodium membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
microvillus membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
ruffle membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
integrin alphav-beta3 complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
melanosomeIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
synapseIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
integrin alphaIIb-beta3 complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
glycinergic synapseIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
integrin complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
alphav-beta3 integrin-PKCalpha complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
alphav-beta3 integrin-IGF-1-IGF1R complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
alphav-beta3 integrin-HMGB1 complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
receptor complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
alphav-beta3 integrin-vitronectin complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
alpha9-beta1 integrin-ADAM8 complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
synapseIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
platelet alpha granule membraneIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
integrin alphaIIb-beta3 complexIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
blood microparticleIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
integrin complexIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (63)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1345450Human succinate receptor (Succinate receptor)2004Nature, May-13, Volume: 429, Issue:6988
Citric acid cycle intermediates as ligands for orphan G-protein-coupled receptors.
AID1345450Human succinate receptor (Succinate receptor)2015Biochemical pharmacology, Dec-01, Volume: 98, Issue:3
Forskolin-free cAMP assay for Gi-coupled receptors.
AID1345450Human succinate receptor (Succinate receptor)2017British journal of pharmacology, 05, Volume: 174, Issue:9
Identification and pharmacological characterization of succinate receptor agonists.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID588210Human drug-induced liver injury (DILI) modelling dataset from Ekins et al2010Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Dec, Volume: 38, Issue:12
A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.
AID1432760Inhibition of Sporosarcina pasteurii CCM 2056 urease assessed as reduction in ammonia production by measuring steady state enzyme-inhibitor complex using urea as substrate measured for 120 mins by phenol-hypochlorite method2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 03-15, Volume: 27, Issue:6
Potent covalent inhibitors of bacterial urease identified by activity-reactivity profiling.
AID1432754Time-dependent Sporosarcina pasteurii CCM 2056 urease assessed as reduction in ammonia production using urea as substrate by phenol-hypochlorite method2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 03-15, Volume: 27, Issue:6
Potent covalent inhibitors of bacterial urease identified by activity-reactivity profiling.
AID1432751Inhibition of Sporosarcina pasteurii CCM 2056 urease assessed as reduction in ammonia production using urea as substrate measured for 120 mins by phenol-hypochlorite method2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 03-15, Volume: 27, Issue:6
Potent covalent inhibitors of bacterial urease identified by activity-reactivity profiling.
AID1432759Inhibition of Sporosarcina pasteurii CCM 2056 urease assessed as reduction in ammonia production by measuring initial state enzyme-inhibitor complex using urea as substrate measured for 120 mins by phenol-hypochlorite method2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 03-15, Volume: 27, Issue:6
Potent covalent inhibitors of bacterial urease identified by activity-reactivity profiling.
AID1432755Competitive inhibition of Sporosarcina pasteurii CCM 2056 urease assessed as reduction in ammonia production preincubated with enzyme followed by addition of varying levels of urea as substrate measured for 120 mins by Lineweaver-Burk plot analysis2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 03-15, Volume: 27, Issue:6
Potent covalent inhibitors of bacterial urease identified by activity-reactivity profiling.
AID429167Inhibition of wild type human recombinant mitochondrial NADP-ME expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 assessed as residual enzyme activity by spectrophotometry in presence of fumarate2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-01, Volume: 17, Issue:15
Effects of structural analogues of the substrate and allosteric regulator of the human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme.
AID429164Inhibition of human mitochondrial NADP-ME E59L mutant expressed in Escherichia coli XL-1 assessed as residual enzyme activity by spectrophotometry in presence of fumarate2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-01, Volume: 17, Issue:15
Effects of structural analogues of the substrate and allosteric regulator of the human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme.
AID1432756Reversible inhibition of Sporosarcina pasteurii CCM 2056 urease assessed as reduction in ammonia production by measuring recovery of enzyme activity at 10 times IC50 preincubated for 60 mins followed by 100-fold dilution in to PBS containing urea as subst2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 03-15, Volume: 27, Issue:6
Potent covalent inhibitors of bacterial urease identified by activity-reactivity profiling.
AID588209Literature-mined public compounds from Greene et al multi-species hepatotoxicity modelling dataset2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jul-19, Volume: 23, Issue:7
Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
AID429165Inhibition of human mitochondrial NADP-ME E59L mutant expressed in Escherichia coli XL-1 assessed as residual enzyme activity by spectrophotometry in absence of fumarate2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-01, Volume: 17, Issue:15
Effects of structural analogues of the substrate and allosteric regulator of the human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme.
AID429166Inhibition of wild type human recombinant mitochondrial NADP-ME expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 assessed as residual enzyme activity by spectrophotometry in absence of fumarate2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-01, Volume: 17, Issue:15
Effects of structural analogues of the substrate and allosteric regulator of the human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme.
AID1811Experimentally measured binding affinity data derived from PDB1995Nature structural biology, Jul, Volume: 2, Issue:7
Alternating arginine-modulated substrate specificity in an engineered tyrosine aminotransferase.
AID977611Experimentally measured binding affinity data (Kd) for protein-ligand complexes derived from PDB1995Nature structural biology, Jul, Volume: 2, Issue:7
Alternating arginine-modulated substrate specificity in an engineered tyrosine aminotransferase.
AID1811Experimentally measured binding affinity data derived from PDB2004Biochemistry, Oct-12, Volume: 43, Issue:40
Narrowing substrate specificity in a directly evolved enzyme: the A293D mutant of aspartate aminotransferase.
AID977611Experimentally measured binding affinity data (Kd) for protein-ligand complexes derived from PDB2004Biochemistry, Oct-12, Volume: 43, Issue:40
Narrowing substrate specificity in a directly evolved enzyme: the A293D mutant of aspartate aminotransferase.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (745)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-1990134 (17.99)18.7374
1990's129 (17.32)18.2507
2000's120 (16.11)29.6817
2010's240 (32.21)24.3611
2020's122 (16.38)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 81.12

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index81.12 (24.57)
Research Supply Index6.69 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.81 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index144.80 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (81.12)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials17 (2.17%)5.53%
Reviews11 (1.40%)6.00%
Case Studies6 (0.77%)4.05%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Other750 (95.66%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (110)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Comparison of Intraocular Pressure, Blood Pressure, Ocular Perfusion and Blood Flow Fluctuations During the Addition of Dorzolamid vs Timolol in Glaucoma Subjects Treated With Prostaglandin Analogue Monotherapy [NCT01304264]35 participants (Actual)Observational2011-03-31Completed
A Randomized Trial of Neratinib, A Pan-ERBB Inhibitor, Alone or in Combination With Palbociclib, a CDK4/6 Inhibitor, in Patients With HER2+ Gynecologic Cancers and Other Solid Tumors: A ComboMATCH Treatment Trial [NCT06126276]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-02-20Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Triplet Therapy (A PD-L1 Inhibitor Durvalumab (MEDI4736) in Combination With Olaparib and Cediranib) Compared to Olaparib and Cediranib or Durvalumab (MEDI4736) and Cediranib or Standard of Care Chemotherapy in Women With Pl [NCT04739800]Phase 2164 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-10Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Single-Agent Olaparib, Single Agent Cediranib, and the Combinations of Cediranib/Olaparib, Olaparib/Durvalumab (MEDI4736), Cediranib/Durvalumab (MEDI4736), Olaparib/AZD5363 (Capivasertib) in Women With Recurrent, Pers [NCT03660826]Phase 2288 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-27Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase II/III Study of the Combination of Cediranib and Olaparib Compared to Cediranib or Olaparib Alone, or Standard of Care Chemotherapy in Women With Recurrent Platinum-Resistant or -Refractory Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal [NCT02502266]Phase 2/Phase 3562 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-03Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/Randomized Phase II Study of Cediranib (NSC#732208) Versus Placebo in Combination With Cisplatin and Pemetrexed in Chemonaive Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma [NCT01064648]Phase 1/Phase 2117 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-15Active, not recruiting
A Single Site, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Incremental Phase I Clinical Trial: to Evaluate the Tolerance, PK and PD Effects of TPN-672 Maleate in Chinese Healthy Volunteers After Single Dose Administration. [NCT03931668]Early Phase 162 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-17Recruiting
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Pyrotinib After Adjuvant Anti-HRE2 Therapy in Women With High-risk in Early or Locally Advanced Stage Breast Cancer [NCT05834764]Phase 2188 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-08Recruiting
International Randomized Study of Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus CyberKnife for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT01327521]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to Accrual below target levels)
Optimizing Timolol Maleate Treatment of Infantile Hemangioma by Doppler Ultrasound Examination: a Single Center, Open Cohort Study. [NCT03842631]150 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-02-16Recruiting
Phase II Study Of Oral PHA-848125AC In Patients With Malignant Thymoma Previously Treated With Multiple Lines Of Chemotherapy [NCT01301391]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-02Terminated(stopped due to For the last patient still on treated nominal therapeutic use of the Milciclib was approved at INT Milano.)
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-escalation Phase I Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic Profile of Multiple Doses of TPN672 Tablets Maleate in Patients With Schizophrenia [NCT05192304]Phase 162 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-01Not yet recruiting
A Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo Controlled, Two Period Cross-Over Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Orvepitant in Chronic Cough in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis [NCT05185089]Phase 288 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-01Recruiting
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Three Doses of Orvepitant in Subjects With Chronic Refractory Cough [NCT02993822]Phase 2315 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-22Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Phase 2b Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Twice-Daily Oral Administration of a Peripherally Acting Dopamine Receptor D2/D3 Antagonist, TAK-906 for the Treatment of Ad [NCT03544229]Phase 2242 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-14Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Three-period Cross-over Study to Assess the Pharmacodynamics, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Two Orally Inhaled Indacaterol Salts (Maleate and Acetate) Delivered Via the Concept1 Inhalation De [NCT03257995]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-05Completed
Acute Effect of Indacaterol Maleate on Static and Dynamic Lung Volume in COPD Subjects. [NCT01377051]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
Anti-histamines Promote Electroacupuncture Analgesia: Basic and Clinical Research [NCT03805035]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-24Completed
Exploratory Study of Triple-targeted Neoadjuvant Treatment of HER2-positive Breast Cancer With Pyrotinib in Combination With Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab [NCT04929548]Phase 420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-05Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Cediranib and Olaparib Compared to Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma Who Have Not Received Prior VEGF Therapy [NCT02974621]Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-07Active, not recruiting
Avandia™ + Amaryl™ or Avandamet™ Compared With Metformin: A 48-week Randomized, Open-label, Multicentre Phase IIIB Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Combination Therapy to Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients [NCT00131664]Phase 3391 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Open-label, Phase IIb Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sutetinib Maleate Capsule in Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC (Non-resistant Uncommon EGFR Mutations Only, Including L861Q, G719X, and/or S768I) [NCT05168566]Phase 299 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-01Recruiting
COVER - Continuing Observation After Vicriviroc (VCV) Exposure Registry [NCT00705419]180 participants (Actual)Observational2007-07-31Completed
A Phase II, Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Active-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of HRG2005 Inhalation in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [NCT06035393]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-27Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sutetinib Maleate Capsule in Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC (Uncommon EGFR Mutations Only) [NCT06010329]Phase 266 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Recruiting
Randomized, Phase II, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Conventional Chemoradiation and Adjuvant Temozolomide Plus Cediranib Versus Conventional Chemoradiation and Adjuvant Temozolomide Plus Placebo in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma [NCT01062425]Phase 2261 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-26Completed
Phase II Clinical Trial of AZD2171 Monotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients [NCT00458978]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
A Pharmacokinetic Feasibility Study on Ultibro Breezhaler, an Indacaterol-glycopyrronium Inhalation Powder Capsule, in Healthy Subjects [NCT04856098]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-07Completed
An Open Label, Randomized, 2-sequence, 2-period, Single-dose Cross-over Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of Besifovir in Healthy Adult Volunteers [NCT02300688]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
A Phase Ib/II Study of AZD2171 in Combination With Daily Temozolomide and Radiation in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Not Taking Enzyme-Inducing Anti-epileptic Drugs [NCT00662506]Phase 1/Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Phase II Basket Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Neratinib, An Irreversible Tyrosine Kinases Inhibitor of EGFR, ERBB2 and ERBB4 Receptors and Trastuzumab Biosimilar (Herzuma®) in Patients With HER2 Mutated Advanced Solid Cancers [NCT06083662]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-15Active, not recruiting
Pyrotinib in Combination With Nab-paclitaxel in Patients With HER2-positive Advanced Breast Cancer: an Exploratory Study [NCT03919253]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-30Not yet recruiting
Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Timolol in Infants With Infantile Hemangioma (IH) [NCT02913612]Phase 2105 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-05Completed
A 2-Part, Randomized, Double Blind and Open-Label, Placebo and Active-Comparator Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics for TAK-906 in Subjects With Diabetes Mellitus and Gastroparesis or With Idiopathic Gastropares [NCT03268941]Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-26Completed
A Randomized Controlled, Double-blind, Multicenter, Phase III Clinical Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Abivertinib Maleate Versus First-line Standard Therapy EGFR-TKI in Patients With Advanced NSCLC With Sensitive EGFR Mutation [NCT03856697]Phase 3406 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-31Not yet recruiting
Phase II Study Of Oral PHA-848125AC In Patients With Thymic Carcinoma Previously Treated With Chemotherapy [NCT01011439]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-22Terminated(stopped due to For the 2 last patients still on treated nominal therapeutic use of the Milciclib was approved at INT Milano.)
[NCT00822055]Phase 4140 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
A Non-randomized, Open, Single-dose, Parallel Designed Clinical Study to Evaluate Safety and Pharmacokinetic Characteristics After Oral Administration of Besivo® in Patients With Renal Impairment and Healthy Adult Volunteers [NCT04249908]Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-13Not yet recruiting
Phase IIA Exploratory Study of Oral Milciclib Maleate in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT03109886]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-12Completed
A Multicenter, Prospective, Adaptive, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Interferon Lambda 1A, Fluvoxamina + Budesonida, Fluoxetina + Budesonida in Mild COVID-19 and High Risk of Complications [NCT04727424]Phase 36,246 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-19Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of 14-days Treatment With an Inhaled Dose of QMF149 (500/800) in Mild to Moderate Asthmatic Patients [NCT00605306]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Multicenter, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK0507A in Patients With Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Who Are Inadequately Controlled on Beta-Blockers [NCT00449956]Phase 3474 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-12Completed
A Phase 2 Study of Olaparib and Cediranib for the Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer [NCT02345265]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-17Active, not recruiting
A Phase Ib Study of Cediranib in Combination With Cilengitide in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma [NCT00979862]Phase 147 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
[NCT00759239]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Enalapril Maleate and Folic Acid Tablets for Primary Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Hypertension: a Post-marketing, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT00794885]Phase 420,702 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Palliative Radiofrequency Ablation in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients With Small Primary Tumor [NCT00891475]Phase 1/Phase 2114 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Vicriviroc (SCH 417690) Treatment Protocol in HIV-Infected Subjects: A Rollover Study for ACTG Protocol A5211 [NCT00686829]Phase 279 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Role of Preemptive Chlorepheniramine Maleate in Reducing Postoperative Agitation After Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries (FESS) [NCT04293081]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-16Completed
A Phase III Study Comparing Single-Agent Olaparib or the Combination of Cediranib and Olaparib to Standard Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Women With Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer [NCT02446600]Phase 3579 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-28Active, not recruiting
A Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Cosopt® Versus Xalacom® on Ocular Hemodynamics and Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma [NCT00815373]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to no participants recruded.)
[NCT00822081]Phase 4140 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
The Effect of Paroxetine on the Plasma Levels of Timolol Using Ophthalmic 0.5% Timolol Eye Drops and 0.1% Timolol Eye Gel in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00879099]Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
An Exploratory Basket Study of Pyrotinib Maleate Tablets in HER2 Mutated or Amplified of Metastatic Solid Tumors [NCT05274191]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-04Not yet recruiting
A Phase I Study of Subutinib Maleate Capsules on Toleration and Pharmacokinetics [NCT01806376]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-03-31Recruiting
A Pilot/Phase 1b Study of Glasdegib-Based Treatment Combinations in Adult Patients With Relapsed AML Post Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT04655391]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-06-25Withdrawn(stopped due to Drug availability)
A 12 Week, Open-Label, Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Dorzolamide-Timolol as First Line Therapy to Reduce Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Untreated Open Angle Glaucoma (OAG) or Ocular Hypertension (OH) [NCT00546286]Phase 3170 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Open, Single-dose, Two-cycle, Double-sequence, Crossover Study to Investigate the Effects of a Low-fat Diet On the Pharmacokinetics of Healthy Chinese Adult Participants After Oral Administration of Pyrotinib Maleate Tablets [NCT04315493]Phase 116 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-31Not yet recruiting
A Real-World Study of Pyrotinib Maleate in the Treatment of Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Rare Mutations in HER2 [NCT05411276]15 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2022-06-30Not yet recruiting
Blood-aqueous Barrier Changes After the Use of Timolol and Prostaglandin Analogues Fixed Combination in Pseudophakic Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma [NCT01978015]Phase 469 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Trimebutine Maleate (NEWBUTIN SR 300 mg Tab) as a Prophylactic Anti-emetic Drug for Patients Who Underwent Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: a Randomized Controlled Study [NCT01984931]Phase 345 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-10-31Recruiting
An Open-label, Multi-center, Phase II Umbrella Study to Assess Efficacy of Targeted Therapy or Immunotherapy Directed by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in Chinese Patients With Advanced NSCLC (TRUMP) [NCT03574402]Phase 2400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-09Recruiting
Comparison of Efficacy and Ocular Surface Disease Assessment Between BRIDIN- PLUS® Eye Drops and COMBIGAN® Eye Drops in Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertensive Patients [NCT06078592]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-08Completed
Topical Anti-angiogenic Therapy for Telangiectasia in HHT: Proof of Concept [NCT01752049]Phase 1/Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Department of Geriatrics [NCT02575092]Phase 2/Phase 34,000 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-01Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Single-dose, Double-blind, 4-way Cross-over Study to Evaluate Tolerability Following Treatment With Indacaterol Salts (Maleate, Xinafoate and Acetate) in Comparison to Placebo in Patients With Mild to Moderate Persistent Asthma [NCT00624702]Phase 198 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Phase I/II Trial of Cediranib Alone or Cediranib and Lenalidomide in Iodine 131-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer [NCT01208051]Phase 1/Phase 2127 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-09Completed
A Phase II Evaluation of Cediranib (Recentin; AZD2171, IND#72740, NSC# 732208) in the Treatment of Recurrent or Persistent Endometrial Carcinoma [NCT01132820]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Effect of Vicriviroc on HIV RNA Levels in Cerebrospinal Fluid [NCT00632073]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
An Open-label, Phase I Study in Healthy Male Subjects to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of LB80331 and LB80317, Metabolites of LB80380, After a Single Oral Administration of LB80380 Free Base 150 mg (60 mg + 90 mg) Tablet or LB80380 Maleate Tablet 183 mg (1 [NCT01427868]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Enalapril Maleate and Folic Acid Tablets for Prevention of Chronic Kidney Diseases in Patients With Hypertension: a Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01871740]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to The sponsor and the PIs both agreed that the CSPPT-CKD should be a sub-study of the CSPPT insted of an independent randomized trial.)
An Open-Label Phase Ib/II Multi-Arm Study of OX40 Agonist Monoclonal Antibody (mAb), Anti-PDL1 mAb, Smoothened Inhibitor, Anti-CD33 mAb, Bcl-2 Inhibitor and Azacitidine as Single-Agents and/or Combinations for the Treatment of Patients With Acute Myeloid [NCT03390296]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-27Completed
A Phase II Study of Olaparib Plus Cediranib in Combination With Standard Therapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT02899728]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-30Terminated(stopped due to Inadequate accrual rate)
Patient Preference Comparison of AZARGA Versus COSOPT After Single Doses in Patients With Open-Angled Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT01471158]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
[NCT00273442]Phase 460 participants Interventional2005-11-30Completed
[NCT00273481]Phase 433 participants Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Randomized, Multicenter, Dbl-Masked, Parallel Study Evaluating the 24 Hr. Diurnal Ocular Hypotensive Effect of 2% Dorzolamide Hydrochloride/0.5% Timolol Maleate Combo. Ophthalmic Sol. in Patients w/ Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00108017]Phase 3330 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active (Formoterol 12 µg b.i.d) and Placebo Controlled, Multi-center, 5 Period Crossover Study to Assess the Bronchodilatory Efficacy and Safety of Single Doses of Indacaterol 150 µg, 300 µg and 600 µg Delivered V [NCT00403637]Phase 2/Phase 345 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Molecular Analysis for Combination Therapy Choice (ComboMATCH) [NCT05564377]Phase 22,900 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-07Recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Cediranib and Olaparib in Combination for Treatment of Recurrent Papillary-Serous Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer or for Treatment of Recurrent Triple-Negative Breast Cancer [NCT01116648]Phase 1/Phase 2155 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-14Active, not recruiting
Patient Satisfaction With Timolol Maleate in Sorbate, Generic Timolol Gel Forming Solution or Timolol Hemihydrate in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00804648]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
A Multi-centre, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multiple-dose, 4-way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Orally Inhaled Indacaterol Salts (Maleate, Xinafoate, and Acetate) in Patients With [NCT00927901]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active (Formoterol 12 µg b.i.d) and Placebo Controlled, Multi-center, 5 Period Crossover Study to Assess the Bronchodilatory Efficacy and Safety of Single Doses of Indacaterol 150 µg, 300 µg and 600 µg Delivered V [NCT00396604]Phase 2/Phase 351 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Study of Avatrombopag for Persistent Chemotherapy-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients With Gastrointestinal Malignancies (ACT-GI) [NCT05772546]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-30Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter, Dose-ranging, Efficacy and Safety Study of Three Doses of TCH346 (1mg, 5mg and 20mg Daily) in Patients With Early Parkinson's Disease [NCT00407212]Phase 1/Phase 2301 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Combigan With Timolol Adjunctive to Xalatan in Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Subjects [NCT00735449]Phase 4204 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
[NCT00273429]Phase 40 participants Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Can Urgent Reduction of Intraocular Pressure With Ophthalmic Timolol Improve Recovery From Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION): a Randomized Study. [NCT01607671]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Unable to recruit participants from recruiting sites.)
A Phase I Clinical Trial of AZD2171 in Children With Recurrent or Progressive Central Nervous System (CNS) Tumors [NCT00326664]Phase 155 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Three-period, Partial-replicate Design Study to Evaluate the Inter- and Intrasubject Variability of the Avatrombopag To-be-marketed Formulation Administered as Single Doses of 40 mg to Healthy Subjects Receiving a Low-fat Meal [NCT01759394]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
An Exploratory, Multi-centre, Double-blind, Placebocontrolled Crossover Study, to Investigate the Bronchodilatory Efficacy of a Single Dose of Indacaterol in Fixed Combination With Mometasone Furoate Delivered Via a MDDPI (Twisthaler®) in Adult Patients W [NCT00556673]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Enhancing Breast Milk Production With Domperidone in Mothers of Preterm Neonates [NCT01512225]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Parallel-group Trial With an Open-label Extension Phase to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral E5501 Versus Eltrombopag, in Adults With Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia (Idiopathic T [NCT01433978]Phase 324 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-26Terminated(stopped due to Study was terminated early due to significant enrollment challenges.)
Efficacy and Safety of Entecavir Maleate Tablets in Chinese Patients With Hepatitis B [NCT01926288]Phase 4287 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
A Phase 2 Study of AZD2171 in Progressive Unresectable, Recurrent or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) [NCT00227760]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
Effect of Atazanavir Administered With and Without Ritonavir on the Pharmacokinetics of the Cytochrome P450 2C8 Substrate Rosiglitazone in Healthy Subjects [NCT00362726]Phase 114 participants Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Fixed-Dose, 6-Week, In-Patient Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of HP-3070 in Subjects Diagnosed With Schizophrenia [NCT02876900]Phase 3617 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Completed
Comparing the Dentin Conditioning Effect of Different Single and Combination Chelating Agents on Sealer Penetration and Dentin Erosion [NCT05778227]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-11-16Completed
Phase I Study of the Combination of the VEGFR Inhibitor, AZD2171, and MEK Inhibitor, AZD6244, in the Treatment of Solid Malignancies [NCT01364051]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-25Active, not recruiting
A Multi-centre, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Multiple-dose, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Orally Inhaled Indacaterol Administered as Either PulmoSphere or Lactose-blend Powder Via [NCT01484197]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Efficacy of Avatrombopag in Thrombocytopenic Patients With Chronic Liver Disease Undergoing an Elective Procedure: A Prospective Non-randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04915287]Phase 4476 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-06Recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Standardized Versus Conventional Oxytocin and Uterotonic Agent Use for Cesarean Delivery [NCT01549223]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
A Phase II Study of AZD2171 in Adult Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and Extensive Plexiform and Paraspinal Neurofibromas [NCT00326872]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Closed due to slow accrual prior to interim analysis.)
Inetetamab, Pyrotinib and Chemotherapy in Combination for First-line Treatment of HER2-positive Recurrent/Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT05621434]Phase 263 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-10Not yet recruiting
[NCT00811850]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Assessment of Relative Bioavailability of Avandamet 4 mg + 1000 mg (GSK) in the Form of Film Coated Tablets Versus Avandamet 2 mg + 500 mg (GSK) in the Form of Film Coated Tablets, in Healthy Volunteers After Feeding Standardized, Using Liquid Chromatogra [NCT01332071]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-24Completed
Phase I Trial of DS-8201a (Trastuzumab Deruxtecan) in Combination With Neratinib in Solid Tumors With HER2 Alterations [NCT05372614]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-05Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Cediranib in Combination With Olaparib in Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT02498613]Phase 2126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-08-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Trial With an Open-label Extension Phase to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral E5501 Plus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Thrombocytopenia in Adults With Chro [NCT01438840]Phase 349 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-16Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Brinzolamide 1%/Timolol 0.5% Fixed Combination Versus Dorzolamide 1%/Timolol 0.5% in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension [NCT02325518]Phase 4218 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Adiponectin at Month 12
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 4
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 12
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in 5 Year UKPDS Risk Scores at Month 6
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 12
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 4
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 6
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 12
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 4
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 6
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 12
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in 5 Year UKPDS Risk Scores at Month 12
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 4
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Month 6
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 6
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 6
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Adiponectin at Month 6
NCT00131664 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Month 12
NCT00227760 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00227760 (3) [back to overview]Objective Response, Evaluated Using RECIST
NCT00227760 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Durable Stable Disease, Evaluated Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
NCT00326872 (5) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure as Assessed Using the Method of Kaplan-Meier
NCT00326872 (5) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression as Measured Using Kaplan-Meier Method
NCT00326872 (5) [back to overview]Survival Time as Measured Using Kaplan-Meier Method
NCT00326872 (5) [back to overview]Reduction in Self Reported Worst Pain Per Cycle.
NCT00326872 (5) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Tumor Response (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR])
NCT00449956 (3) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Outflow Pressure Reduction Rate at 8 Weeks
NCT00449956 (3) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 Weeks
NCT00449956 (3) [back to overview]Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline at 8 Weeks
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Concentration Following Drug Administration for Indacaterol
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Maximum (Peak) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Mometasone Furoate
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Maximum (Peak) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Indacaterol
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Change From Period Baseline to 24 Hour Post-dose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Change From Period Baseline in Trough Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Change From Period Baseline in Trough FEV1/FVC Ratio
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Change From Period Baseline in Peak Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Change From Period Baseline in Peak Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Change From Period Baseline in Peak FEV1/FVC Ratio
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose for Mometasone Furoate
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose for Indacaterol
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 12 Hours Post-dose for Mometasone Furoate
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Change From Period Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Concentration Following Drug Administration for Mometasone Furoate
NCT00605306 (4) [back to overview]Levels of Plasma Glucose Over Time
NCT00605306 (4) [back to overview]Levels of Serum Cortisol Over Time
NCT00605306 (4) [back to overview]Levels of Serum Potassium Over Time
NCT00605306 (4) [back to overview]Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00686829 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA ≥400 Copies/mL
NCT00686829 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA >50 to <400 Copies/mL
NCT00686829 (11) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in CD4/CD8 Cell Counts
NCT00686829 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HIV Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/mL
NCT00686829 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AIDS-defining Events (ADEs)
NCT00686829 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With New Infections
NCT00686829 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Reduced Susceptibility to VCV
NCT00686829 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Therapy Due to AEs
NCT00686829 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥1 Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00686829 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Coreceptor Tropism Shifts From Baseline
NCT00686829 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥1 Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00735449 (5) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 AM at Week 6
NCT00735449 (5) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 AM at Week 12
NCT00735449 (5) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 10 AM at Week 6
NCT00735449 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Adverse Events
NCT00735449 (5) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 10 AM at Week 12
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Stinging on Instillation
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Intraoclular Pressure
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Corneal Staining Grade
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Corneal Staining Count
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Grade
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Count
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Count
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Visual Acuity
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Conjunctival Hyperemia
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Basic Schirmer's
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Grade
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Tear Film Break-up Time
NCT00811850 (8) [back to overview]Retrobulbar Blood Flow (End Diastolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Nasal Short Posterior Ciliary Artery
NCT00811850 (8) [back to overview]Retrobulbar Blood Flow (Peak Systolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Temporal Short Posterior Ciliary Artery
NCT00811850 (8) [back to overview]Retrobulbar Blood Flow (Peak Systolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Ophthalmic Artery
NCT00811850 (8) [back to overview]Retrobulbar Blood Flow (Peak Systolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Nasal Short Posterior Ciliary Artery
NCT00811850 (8) [back to overview]Retrobulbar Blood Flow (End Diastolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Central Retinal Artery
NCT00811850 (8) [back to overview]Retrobulbar Blood Flow (Peak Systolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Central Retinal Artery
NCT00811850 (8) [back to overview]Retrobulbar Blood Flow (End Diastolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Temporal Short Posterior Ciliary Artery
NCT00811850 (8) [back to overview]Retrobulbar Blood Flow (End Diastolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Ophthalmic Artery
NCT00927901 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Using Rescue Medication During Each 7 Day Treatment Period
NCT00927901 (6) [back to overview]Time to Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) on Day 1 and Day 7
NCT00927901 (6) [back to overview]Indacaterol Exposure (Cmax) at the End of Each 7 Day Treatment Period
NCT00927901 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) 24 Hours Post-dose at the End of Each Treatment Period (Day 7)
NCT00927901 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) 24 Hours Post-dose on Day 1
NCT00927901 (6) [back to overview]Indacaterol Exposure (AUC[0-24 Hours]) at the End of Each 7 Day Treatment Period
NCT01011439 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01011439 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01011439 (6) [back to overview]Overall Safety Profile (Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) and Hematological and Blood Chemistry Parameters)
NCT01011439 (6) [back to overview]Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01011439 (6) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate
NCT01011439 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01062425 (4) [back to overview]6-month Progression-free Survival Rate
NCT01062425 (4) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade 3+ Toxicities
NCT01062425 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01062425 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01064648 (9) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate by Modified RECIST (Phase II)
NCT01064648 (9) [back to overview](Phase I) Number of Patients With Gr 3 Through 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drugs
NCT01064648 (9) [back to overview](Phase II) Number of Patients With Gr 3 Through 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drugs
NCT01064648 (9) [back to overview]Response Rate by RECIST1.1 (Phase II)
NCT01064648 (9) [back to overview]Response Rate by Modified RECIST (Phase II)
NCT01064648 (9) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (Phase II)
NCT01064648 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival (Phase II)
NCT01064648 (9) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of Cediranib in Combination With Cisplatin and Pemetrexed (Phase I)
NCT01064648 (9) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate by RECIST 1.1 (Phase II)
NCT01116648 (4) [back to overview]The Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cediranib in Combination With Olaparib Tablet Formulation in the Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer (Phase I-T).
NCT01116648 (4) [back to overview]The Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cediranib in Combination With Olaparib in the Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer or Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer (Phase I)
NCT01116648 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) at the Maximum Tolerated Dose/Recommended Phase 2 Dose of Cediranib Maleate With Olaparib Compared to That of Olaparib Alone (Phase II)
NCT01116648 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities of Cediranib Maleate in Combination With Olaparib (Phase I)
NCT01132820 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Effects as Assessed by the National Cancer Institute CTCAE v. 4.0
NCT01132820 (6) [back to overview]Tumor Response
NCT01132820 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01132820 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01132820 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) = > 6 Months
NCT01132820 (6) [back to overview]Response Without Regard to the Time of Documented Response
NCT01208051 (6) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT01208051 (6) [back to overview]Dose Limiting Toxicity
NCT01208051 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (Final Results After Crossover)
NCT01208051 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change in Tumor Size (Phase II)
NCT01208051 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (Final Results After Crossover)
NCT01208051 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (Phase II Futility Analysis)
NCT01301391 (7) [back to overview]Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) and Hematological and Blood Chemistry Parameters
NCT01301391 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01301391 (7) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01301391 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01301391 (7) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (ORR+SD Rate)
NCT01301391 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01301391 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Rate at 3 Months
NCT01332071 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-infinity of Metformin Hydrochloride
NCT01332071 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-infinity of Rosiglitazone Maleate
NCT01332071 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-t of Metformin Hydrochloride
NCT01332071 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-t of Rosiglitazone Maleate
NCT01332071 (6) [back to overview]Cmax of Metformin Hydrochloride
NCT01332071 (6) [back to overview]Cmax of Rosiglitazone Maleate
NCT01433978 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Local Platelet Count for the 6 Month Treatment Period
NCT01433978 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Local Platelet Count for the 6 Month Treatment Period
NCT01438840 (3) [back to overview]Number of Weeks With Platelet Count Greater Than or Equal to 50 x 10^9/L During 6-Month Treatment Period
NCT01438840 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Reduction in Use of Concomitant Immune/Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Medication
NCT01438840 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Platelet Count Greater Than or Equal to 50 x 10^9/L at Day 8
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]Standardized FEV1 AUC Between Baseline (Pre-dose) and 12 Hour Post-dose (AUC0-12h)
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]Standardized FEV1 AUC Between Baseline (Pre-dose) and 4 Hour Post-dose (AUC0-4h)
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]Time to Peak FEV1 at Day 1 and Day 7
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) After Drug Administration
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]Peak Expiratory Flow Rate in the Morning in the Evening
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]Number of Puffs of Rescue Medicine
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) After 1 Day of Treatment
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) After 7 Days of Treatment
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve Pre-dose to 24 Hour Post Dose (AUC0-24h)
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]FEV1 at Each Time-Point on Day 1 and Day 2
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]FEV1 at Each Time-Point on Day 7 and Day 8
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]FEV1/FVC at Each Post-Dose Time Point on Day 1 and Day 2
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]FEV1/FVC at Each Post-dose Time Point on Day 7 and Day 8
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]Forced Expiratory Flow 25- 75% (FEF25-75) on Day 1 and Day 2
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]Forced Expiratory Flow 25- 75% (FEF25-75) on Day 7 and Day 8
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Time-Point on Day 1 and Day 2
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Time-Point on Day 7 and Day 8
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]Observed Maximum Concentration (Cmax) After Drug Administration
NCT01484197 (20) [back to overview]Peak FEV1 at Day 1 and Day 7
NCT01512225 (8) [back to overview]Increase in Breast Milk Production
NCT01512225 (8) [back to overview]Increase in Breast Milk Volume on Day 28
NCT01512225 (8) [back to overview]Mean Breast Milk Volumes on Day 14
NCT01512225 (8) [back to overview]Mean Breast Milk Volumes on Day 28
NCT01512225 (8) [back to overview]Mean Volume Change From Day 0 to Day 14
NCT01512225 (8) [back to overview]Mean Volume Change on the Volume of Milk From Day 15 to Day 28
NCT01512225 (8) [back to overview]Provision of Breast Milk at 6 Weeks Post Term Gestation
NCT01512225 (8) [back to overview]Provision of Breast Milk at Term Gestation
NCT01549223 (2) [back to overview]Side Effects (Hypotension, Flushing, Nausea and Emesis) Associated With Uterotonic Drug Use
NCT01549223 (2) [back to overview]1. Amount of Oxytocin to Obtain Satisfactory Uterine Tone.
NCT01752049 (1) [back to overview]Change in Lesion Area of Treated Telangiectasia.
NCT02325518 (2) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 11 AM
NCT02325518 (2) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at 9 AM
NCT02345265 (2) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
NCT02345265 (2) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by HRR Status in Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Cancer
NCT02446600 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02446600 (4) [back to overview]Patient Reported Scores of Disease-related Symptoms as Measured by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Ovarian Symptom Index-18 Disease-Related Symptom-Physical
NCT02446600 (4) [back to overview]Frequency and Severity of Adverse Effects
NCT02446600 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival Determined Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 Criteria
NCT02876900 (2) [back to overview]Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Asenapine Maleate Patches Compared With Placebo Patches in Subjects Diagnosed With Schizophrenia as Measured Using the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale: Change From Baseline to Week 6.
NCT02876900 (2) [back to overview]Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Asenapine Maleate Patches Compared With Placebo Patches in Subjects Diagnosed With Schizophrenia as Measured Using the Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 6.
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Reach Partial Response, Assessed by Hemangioma Color
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Partial Response of Hemangioma Volume as Measured by VAS (Visual Analog Scale) Within Each Treatment Arm and Compared With Untreated Controls
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Partial Response of Hemangioma Volume as Measured by VAS (Visual Analog Scale) Within Each Treatment Arm
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Comparison of Partial Response of Hemangioma Color From Baseline to 180 Days, Within Each Treatment Arm
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Change in Hemangioma Quality of Life (IH-QoL) Assessment for Infants
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Change in Hemangioma Dynamic Complication Scale (HDCS)
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Partial Response in Hemangioma Color as Measured by VAS (Visual Analog Scale) Within Each Treatment Arm and Compared With Untreated Controls
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Number of Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Events of Special Interest in Infants Treated With Topical Timolol Maleate
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Reach Partial Response, Assessed by Volume
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Awake Objective Cough Frequency
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at Week 2 Compared to Baseline
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at Week 4 Compared to Baseline
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in the Urge-to-cough Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 8 Compared to Baseline
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in the Urge-to-cough Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 4 Compared to Baseline
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 12 Compared to Baseline - Day-time
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at Week 8 Compared to Baseline
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 2 Compared to Baseline - Day-time
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at Week 4 Compared to Baseline
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at Week 2 Compared to Baseline
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 2 Compared to Baseline - Night-time
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in the Urge-to-cough Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 12 Compared to Baseline
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in the Urge-to-cough Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 2 Compared to Baseline
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at Week 12 Compared to Baseline
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 8 Compared to Baseline - Night-time
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 8 Compared to Baseline - Day-time
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 4 Compared to Baseline - Night-time
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 4 Compared to Baseline - Day-time
NCT02993822 (19) [back to overview]Change in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 12 Compared to Baseline - Night-time
NCT03257995 (16) [back to overview]Bronchodilator Effect of Indacaterol Salts Compared to Placebo Measured by FEF25-75%
NCT03257995 (16) [back to overview]Trough FEV1
NCT03257995 (16) [back to overview]Time to Peak FEV1 on Day 14
NCT03257995 (16) [back to overview]Time of Maximal Plasma Concentration (Tmax) at Steady State
NCT03257995 (16) [back to overview]The Maximum Concentration (Cmax) at Steady State (ss)
NCT03257995 (16) [back to overview]The Lowest Plasma (or Serum or Blood) Concentration (Cmin) at Steady State
NCT03257995 (16) [back to overview]Rescue Medication Usage
NCT03257995 (16) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics AUC 0-24hours at Steady State
NCT03257995 (16) [back to overview]Mean Overall Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)
NCT03257995 (16) [back to overview]Bronchodilator Effect of Indacaterol Salts Compared to Placebo in Standardized FEV1 AUC.
NCT03257995 (16) [back to overview]Bronchodilator Effect of Indacaterol Salts Compared to Placebo Measured by FEV1/FVC
NCT03257995 (16) [back to overview]Relative Bioavailability (Frel) of Indacaterol Acetate and Indacaterol Maleate
NCT03257995 (16) [back to overview]Percent of Predicted Bronchodilator Effect of Indacaterol Salts Compared to Placebo Measured by FEV1 (% Predicted) at All Timepoints
NCT03257995 (16) [back to overview]Bronchodilator Effect of Indacaterol Salts Compared to Placebo Measured by FVC (% Predicted)
NCT03257995 (16) [back to overview]Bronchodilator Effect of Indacaterol Salts Compared to Placebo Measured by Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
NCT03257995 (16) [back to overview]Bronchodilator Effect of Indacaterol Salts Compared to Placebo Measured by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at All Timepoints
NCT03268941 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced At Least One or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT03268941 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Gastric Emptying Breath Test (GEBT) Gastric Half-emptying Time Following Single Dose Administration of TAK-906 Maleate as Measured by the 13C Spirulina GEBT on Day 1
NCT03268941 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values
NCT03268941 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Values
NCT03268941 (12) [back to overview]Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for TAK-906 in Part 1
NCT03268941 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Vital Signs
NCT03268941 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Gastric Emptying Breath Test (GEBT) Gastric Half-emptying Time as Measured by the 13C Spirulina GEBT Following Multiple Dose Administration of TAK-906 Maleate on Day 7 for Part 1
NCT03268941 (12) [back to overview]AUCτ: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 to Time (T) Over the Dosing Interval for TAK-906 in Part 1
NCT03268941 (12) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Gastric Emptying (GE) Time as Measured by the SmartPill on Day 7 for Part 1
NCT03268941 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Prolactin Concentration on Day 1 at Tmax, Time of First Occurrence of Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) for TAK-906 Maleate for Part 1
NCT03268941 (12) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for TAK 906 in Part 1
NCT03268941 (12) [back to overview]Ctrough: Observed Concentration at the End of a Dosing Interval for TAK-906 in Part 1
NCT03390296 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Response
NCT03390296 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT03544229 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in ANMS GCSI-DD Composite Score at Week 12
NCT03544229 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index-Daily Diary (ANMS GCSI-DD) Composite Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period
NCT03544229 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCI-DD Bloating Severity Scale Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period
NCT03544229 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Early Satiety Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period
NCT03544229 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Nausea Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period
NCT03544229 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Overall Severity of Gastroparesis Symptoms Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period
NCT03544229 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Postprandial Fullness Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period
NCT03544229 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Symptomatic Weeks
NCT03544229 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Recorded Vomiting Frequency at Week 12 of the Treatment Period
NCT03544229 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Total Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period
NCT03544229 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Upper Abdominal Pain Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period
NCT03544229 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) Total Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period

Mean Change From Baseline in Adiponectin at Month 12

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the baseline value, with LOCF from Month 6. Adiponectin was only done at baseline, months 6 and 12. The test was optional and performed only by participating sites. (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionµg/mL (Mean)
Avandia and Amaryl4.95
Avandamet8.21
Metformin1.453

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 4

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 4 value minus the baseline value, with last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF) from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values. (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 4

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Avandia and Amaryl-1.44
Avandamet-1.28
Metformin-0.94

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 12

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the baseline value, with last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF) from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values. (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Avandia and Amaryl-1.50
Avandamet-1.56
Metformin-1.14

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in 5 Year UKPDS Risk Scores at Month 6

"Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the baseline value, with LOCF from Month 2. The UKPDS (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study) risk engine calculated was based on 5 years risk using gender, race, age at diagnosis of diabetes, duration of diabetes, smoking status, A1C, systolic blood pressure and total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ratio at a specified visit.~The UKPDS cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk engine is used to estimate the risk of having coronary heart disease in type II diabetes according to the UKPDS model. The possible risk scores can range from 0 to 100% and hence lower scores would predict a person is less likely to have an event." (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Avandia and Amaryl-1.09
Avandamet-1.05
Metformin-1.54

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 12

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the baseline value, with LOCF from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values. (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionmillimoles per litre (mmol/L) (Mean)
Avandia and Amaryl-2.71
Avandamet-2.76
Metformin-2.12

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 4

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 4 value minus the baseline value, with last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF) from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values. (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 4

Interventionmillimoles per litre (mmol/L) (Mean)
Avandia and Amaryl-2.86
Avandamet-2.33
Metformin-1.75

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 6

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the baseline value, with last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF) from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values. (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionmillimoles per litre (mmol/L) (Mean)
Avandia and Amaryl-2.98
Avandamet-2.55
Metformin-1.86

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 12

A1C responders were described as subjects having achieved A1C less than 7 percent at Month 12 with LOCF from Month 2. (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Avandia and Amaryl95
Avandamet111
Metformin82

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 4

A1C responders were described as subjects having achieved A1C less than 7 percent at Month 4, with LOCF from Month 2. (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Month 4

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Avandia and Amaryl83
Avandamet96
Metformin69

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Achieving A1C Target at Month 6

A1C responders were described as subjects having achieved A1C less than 7 percent at Month 6, with LOCF from Month 2. (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Month 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Avandia and Amaryl94
Avandamet98
Metformin69

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 12

FPG responders were described as subjects having achieved FPG less than 7 mmol/L at Month 12 with LOCF from Month 2. (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Avandia and Amaryl64
Avandamet86
Metformin51

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in 5 Year UKPDS Risk Scores at Month 12

"Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the baseline value, with LOCF from Month 2. The UKPDS (U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study) risk engine calculated was based on 5 years risk using gender, race, age at diagnosis of diabetes, duration of diabetes, smoking status, A1C, systolic blood pressure and total cholesterol to HDL ratio at a specified visit.~The UKPDS cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk engine is used to estimate the risk of having coronary heart disease in type II diabetes according to the UKPDS model. The possible risk scores can range from 0 to 100% and hence lower scores would predict a person is less likely to have an event." (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Avandia and Amaryl-0.72
Avandamet-0.62
Metformin-1.11

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 4

FPG responders were described as subjects having achieved FPG less than 7 mmol/L at Month 4 with LOCF from Month 2. (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Month 4

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Avandia and Amaryl58
Avandamet65
Metformin38

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Month 6

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the baseline value. LOCF was not used for this analysis. CRP was only done at baseline, months 6 and 8. The test was optional and performed only by participating sites. (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionmilligram per decilitre (mg/dL) (Mean)
Avandia and Amaryl-1.20
Avandamet-1.68
Metformin-1.25

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in A1C at Month 6

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the baseline value, with last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF) from Month 2 for withdrawn subjects or missing values. (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

,,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
BaselineChange from baseline
Avandamet7.96-1.39
Avandia and Amaryl8.14-1.61
Metformin7.90-1.02

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Achieving FPG Target at Month 6

FPG responders were described as subjects having achieved FPG less than 7 mmol/L at Month 6 with LOCF from Month 2. (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Month 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Avandia and Amaryl61
Avandamet76
Metformin43

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Adiponectin at Month 6

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the baseline value. LOCF was not used for this analysis. Adiponectin was only done at baseline, months 6 and 12. The test was optional and performed only by participating sites. (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionmicrogram per millilitre (µg/mL) (Mean)
Avandia and Amaryl5.73
Avandamet6.37
Metformin0.23

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Month 12

Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the baseline value, with LOCF from Month 6. CRP was only done at baseline, months 6 and 12. The test was optional and performed only by participating sites. (NCT00131664)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Avandia and Amaryl-0.40
Avandamet-1.52
Metformin-1.52

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

(NCT00227760)
Timeframe: Time from start of treatment to progression, death or last contact, or last tumor assessment before the start of further antitumor therapy, assessed up to 6.5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Cediranib Maleate)8.9

[back to top]

Objective Response, Evaluated Using RECIST

Partial response as assessed by RECIST criteria (NCT00227760)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment (Cediranib Maleate)15

[back to top]

Incidence of Durable Stable Disease, Evaluated Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

Stable disease for a clinical benefit rate, evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (NCT00227760)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticip[ants (Number)
Treatment (Cediranib Maleate)18

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure as Assessed Using the Method of Kaplan-Meier

"Time to treatment failure is defined to be the time from the date of randomization to the date at which the patient is removed from treatment due to progression, toxicity, or refusal. If the patient is considered to be a major treatment violation or is taken off study as a non-protocol failure, the patient will be censored on the date they are removed from treatment.~Time to treatment failure will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier." (NCT00326872)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the date at which the patient is removed from treatment due to progression, toxicity, or refusal up to 51 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Cediranib Maleate)5.9

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression as Measured Using Kaplan-Meier Method

"Progression (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of volumes of target lesions taking as reference the smallest volume recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.~If a patient dies without documentation of disease progression, the patient will be considered to have had tumor progression at the time of their death unless there is sufficient documented evidence to conclude no progression occurred prior to death." (NCT00326872)
Timeframe: From registration to documentation of disease progression up to 26 cycles (28 days/cycle).

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Cediranib Maleate)49.15

[back to top]

Survival Time as Measured Using Kaplan-Meier Method

Survival time is defined as the time from registration to death due to any cause. (NCT00326872)
Timeframe: From registration to death (due to any cause) max 51 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Cediranib Maleate)NA

[back to top]

Reduction in Self Reported Worst Pain Per Cycle.

Reduction in self reported worst pain per cycle as measured by the Worst Pain scale from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group Brief Pain Inventory (short form). The worst pain scale is from 0-10 (10 is worst pain possible). The per-cycle average reduction in worst pain will be analyzed using generalized linear models to account for repeated measures within patients. (NCT00326872)
Timeframe: At baseline, prior to each subsequent course (q 28+/- 3 days), and at end of treatment up to 51 months

Interventionunits on a scale of 0-10 (Mean)
Treatment (Cediranib Maleate)0.137

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Tumor Response (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR])

"Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions.~Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the volume of target lesions taking as reference the baseline volume." (NCT00326872)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of treatment, maximum of 26 cycles (28 days/cycle).

InterventionProportion of patients (Number)
Treatment (Cediranib Maleate)0.0384

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Outflow Pressure Reduction Rate at 8 Weeks

Percent Change from baseline to 8 weeks in Outflow Pressure Reduction Rate assessed 2 hours after ocular instillation (at Hour 2) (NCT00449956)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
MK0507A (Dorzolamide 1.0% / Timolol 0.5% Combination)23.47
Timolol 0.5%17.17
Concomitant (Dorzolamide 1.0% / Timolol 0.5%)26.75

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 Weeks

Percent Change from baseline to 8 weeks in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) assessed 2 hours after ocular instillation (at Hour 2) (NCT00449956)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
MK0507A (Dorzolamide 1.0% / Timolol 0.5% Combination)-11.99
Timolol 0.5%-8.74
Concomitant (Dorzolamide 1.0% / Timolol 0.5%)-13.46

[back to top]

Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline at 8 Weeks

Change from baseline to 8 weeks in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) assessed 2 hours after ocular instillation (at Hour 2) (NCT00449956)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
MK0507A (Dorzolamide 1.0% / Timolol 0.5% Combination)-2.50
Timolol 0.5%-1.82
Concomitant (Dorzolamide 1.0% / Timolol 0.5%)-2.78

[back to top]

Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Concentration Following Drug Administration for Indacaterol

(NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Samples were taken pre-dose and at 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionhours (Median)
Indacaterol/Mometasone0.325

[back to top]

Maximum (Peak) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Mometasone Furoate

(NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Samples were taken pre-dose and at 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone47.3

[back to top]

Maximum (Peak) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Indacaterol

(NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Samples were taken pre-dose and at 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone289

[back to top]

Change From Period Baseline to 24 Hour Post-dose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Change from the period baseline to 24 hour post dose trough FEV1 after 1 day of treatment was modeled using a linear mixed effect model fitting treatment, sequence and period as fixed factors, patient within sequence as a random factor and pre-dose FEV1 as covariate. (NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Pre-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 1, 8 and 15) and 24-hours post-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 2, 9 and 16).

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone0.27
Placebo-0.12
Fluticasone/Salmeterol0.37

[back to top]

Change From Period Baseline in Trough Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

"Trough FEV1 was measured 24 hours post-dose. The FEV1 percent predicted expresses FEV1 as a percentage of the predicted values for participants of similar characteristics (height, age, sex, and sometimes race and weight). A positive change from baseline in FEV1 % predicted indicates improvement in lung function. Change from baseline in trough FEV1 % predicted was modeled using a linear mixed effect model fitting treatment, sequence and period as fixed factors, patient within sequence as a random factor and pre-dose value as covariate." (NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Pre-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 1, 8 and 15) and 24-hours post-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 2, 9 and 16).

InterventionPercent of predicted (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone6.95
Placebo-2.87
Fluticasone/Salmeterol9.85

[back to top]

Change From Period Baseline in Trough FEV1/FVC Ratio

The forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio represents the proportion of a person's vital capacity that they are able to expire in the first second of an expiration. Trough FEV1/FVC was calculated from measurements taken 24 hours post-dose. Change from baseline in trough FEV1/FVC ratio was modeled using a linear mixed effect model fitting treatment, sequence and period as fixed factors, patient within sequence as a random factor and pre-dose value as covariate. (NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Pre-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 1, 8 and 15) and 24-hours post-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 2, 9 and 16).

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone2.50
Placebo2.15
Fluticasone/Salmeterol2.65

[back to top]

Change From Period Baseline in Peak Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

"Peak FEV1 was defined as the peak FEV1 up to 4 hours post-dose. The FEV1 percent predicted expresses FEV1 as a percentage of the predicted values for participants of similar characteristics (height, age, sex, and sometimes race and weight). A positive change from baseline in FEV1 % predicted indicates improvement in lung function. Change from baseline in peak FEV1 % predicted was modeled using a linear mixed effect model fitting treatment, sequence and period as fixed factors, patient within sequence as a random factor and pre-dose value as covariate." (NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Days 1, 8 and 15, pre-dose (Baseline) and 5, 15, and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose.

InterventionPercent of predicted (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone16.27
Placebo6.85
Fluticasone/Salmeterol16.49

[back to top]

Change From Period Baseline in Peak Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

Vital capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Peak FVC was measured up to 4 hours post-dose. Change from baseline in peak FVC was modeled using a linear mixed effect model fitting treatment, sequence and period as fixed factors, patient within sequence as a random factor and pre-dose value as covariate. (NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Days 1, 8 and 15, pre-dose (Baseline) and 5, 15, and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose.

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone0.47
Placebo0.20
Fluticasone/Salmeterol0.35

[back to top]

Change From Period Baseline in Peak FEV1/FVC Ratio

The forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio represents the proportion of a person's vital capacity that they are able to expire in the first second of an expiration. Peak FEV1/FVC was calculated from spirometry measurements taken up to 4 hours post-dose. Change from baseline in peak FEV1/FVC ratio was modeled using a linear mixed effect model fitting treatment, sequence and period as fixed factors, patient within sequence as a random factor and pre-dose value as covariate. (NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Days 1, 8 and 15, pre-dose (Baseline) and 5, 15, and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose.

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone2.86
Placebo2.53
Fluticasone/Salmeterol2.90

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Peak FEV1 is defined as the peak FEV1 between 0 and 4 hours post-dose. The change from baseline in peak FEV1 was modeled using a linear mixed effect model fitting treatment, sequence and period as fixed factors, patient within sequence as a random factor and pre-dose FEV1 as covariate. (NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Days 1, 8 and 15, pre-dose (Baseline) and 5, 15, and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose.

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone0.64
Placebo0.26
Fluticasone/Salmeterol0.62

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose for Mometasone Furoate

(NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Samples were taken pre-dose and at 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone389

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose for Indacaterol

(NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Samples were taken pre-dose and at 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone1331

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 12 Hours Post-dose for Mometasone Furoate

(NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Samples were taken pre-dose and at 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, and 12 hours post-dose.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone287

[back to top]

Change From Period Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

Vital capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Trough FVC was measured 24 hours post-dose. Change form baseline in trough FVC was modeled using a linear mixed effect model fitting treatment, sequence and period as fixed factors, patient within sequence as a random factor and pre-dose value as covariate. (NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Pre-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 1, 8 and 15) and 24-hours post-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 2, 9 and 16).

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone0.22
Placebo-0.14
Fluticasone/Salmeterol0.17

[back to top]

Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Concentration Following Drug Administration for Mometasone Furoate

(NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Samples were taken pre-dose and at 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionhours (Median)
Indacaterol/Mometasone1.05

[back to top]

Levels of Plasma Glucose Over Time

At the specified time-points, blood samples were collected for measurement of plasma glucose and the samples analyzed by a central laboratory. The end of study visit was conducted approximately 5-9 days after the last dose. (NCT00605306)
Timeframe: Baseline; Days 1 and 14 at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 hours post-dose; 12 and 24 hours post dose (Day 2); study completion (5-9 days after last dose, Day 19-23).

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Baseline (N=14, 14)Day 1, pre-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 0.25 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 1 hour post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 2 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 4 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 2, 12 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 2, 24 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 14, pre-dose (N=14, 14)Day 14, 0.25 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 0.5 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 1 hour post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 2 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 4 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)End of study (N=14, 13)
Indacaterol Maleate/Mometasone Furoate5.0795.0575.0074.9505.0365.0577.0645.2215.2935.1295.1365.1575.1365.0936.9295.257
Placebo5.1575.2365.2645.2075.1935.1796.7935.2865.3215.2214.9004.9464.9624.9087.4085.731

[back to top]

Levels of Serum Cortisol Over Time

At the specified time-points, blood samples were collected for measurement of serum cortisol and the samples analyzed by a central laboratory. The end of study visit was conducted approximately 5-9 days after the last dose. (NCT00605306)
Timeframe: Baseline; Days 1 and 14 at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 11, 12, 13 hours post-dose; 24 hours post dose (Day 2); study completion (5-9 days after last dose, Day 19-23).

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Baseline (N=14, 14)Day 1, pre-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 0.25 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 1 hour post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 2 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 4 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 2, 11 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 2, 12 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 2, 13 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 2, 24 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 14, pre-dose (N=14, 14)Day 14, 0.25 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 0.5 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 1 hour post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 2 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 4 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 15, 11 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 15, 12 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 15, 13 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)End of study (N=14, 14)
Indacaterol Maleate/Mometasone Furoate466.214159.643153.786130.14399.14365.35755.929362.500289.929335.214136.857126.071111.50099.50082.78662.07148.214242.143255.500324.857495.286
Placebo441.143140.714151.000130.571131.92984.286102.071478.214404.214370.071193.500122.857127.231121.154106.38594.154102.154417.000388.769385.769417.786

[back to top]

Levels of Serum Potassium Over Time

At the specified time-points, blood samples were collected for measurement of serum potassium and the samples analyzed by a central laboratory. The end of study visit was conducted approximately 5-9 days after the last dose. (NCT00605306)
Timeframe: Baseline; Days 1 and 14 at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 hours post-dose; 12 and 24 hours post-dose (Day 2); study completion (5-9 days after last dose, Day 19-23).

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Baseline (N=14, 14)Day 1, pre-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 0.25 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 1 hour post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 2 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 4 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 2, 12 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 2, 24 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 14, pre-dose (N=14, 14)Day 14, 0.25 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 0.5 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 1 hour post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 2 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 4 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)End of study (N=14, 14)
Indacaterol Maleate/Mometasone Furoate4.2714.2644.2934.1504.1434.1573.9794.4364.2934.1504.0643.9863.9863.9863.8004.364
Placebo4.3364.2794.3144.1794.1714.0933.9294.5004.3864.1364.0924.0924.0384.0383.7924.429

[back to top]

Participants With Adverse Events

"An adverse event (AE) is the appearance or worsening of any undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition occurring after starting the study drug even if the event is not considered to be related to study drug. Abnormal laboratory values or test results constitute adverse events only if they induce clinical signs or symptoms, are considered clinically significant, or require intervention.~A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as an event which is fatal or life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or is medically significant, i.e., defined as an event that jeopardizes the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above." (NCT00605306)
Timeframe: 15 days

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventSerious adverse eventAE resulting in discontinuation
Indacaterol Maleate/Mometasone Furoate900
Placebo1201

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA ≥400 Copies/mL

"The percentage of participants with HIV RNA ≥400 copies/mL at each time point is reported. For this measure, month was defined as each 28-day period on study treatment. The Roche Amplicor® HIV-1 monitor test was used to quantify HIV RNA." (NCT00686829)
Timeframe: Every 12 months up to 60 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Month 12Month 24Month 36Month 48Month 60
VCV 30 mg3525895

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA >50 to <400 Copies/mL

"The percentage of participants with HIV RNA >50 to <400 copies/mL at each time point is reported. For this measure, month was defined as each 28-day period on study treatment. The Roche Amplicor® HIV-1 monitor test was used to quantify HIV RNA." (NCT00686829)
Timeframe: Every 12 months up to 60 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Month 12Month 24Month 36Month 48Month 60
VCV 30 mg131112215

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in CD4/CD8 Cell Counts

"The mean change from baseline in CD4/CD8 counts throughout P4100 until the time of VF is reported. Month was defined as each 28-day period on study treatment. A fluorescent-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis was used to quantify CD4/CD8 lymphocytes. The definition of VF is an increase in HIV RNA level >0.5 log10 copies/mL compared to the baseline HIV RNA level." (NCT00686829)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 48 of ACTG study A5211) and up to time of VF in P4100, assessed up to approximately 5.5 years

Interventioncells/mm^3 (Mean)
Month 2Month 4Month 6Month 8Month 10Month 12Month 14Month 16Month 18Month 20Month 22Month 24Month 26Month 28Month 30Month 32Month 34Month 36Month 38Month 40Month 42Month 44Month 46Month 48Month 50Month 52Month 54Month 56Month 58Month 60Month 62Month 64Month 66Month 68
VCV 30 mg-16.26-17.709.30-0.2012.59-13.8118.5621.632.8219.7124.1932.0434.3636.1038.1047.5961.9343.6390.8175.53104.6591.6191.1993.93128.12107.41136.00129.87188.81122.60132.54147.50283.50300.00

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HIV Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/mL

"The percentage of participants with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL at each time point is reported. For this measure, month was defined as each 28-day period on study treatment. The Roche Amplicor® HIV-1 monitor test was used to quantify HIV RNA." (NCT00686829)
Timeframe: Every 12 months up to 60 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Month 12Month 24Month 36Month 48Month 60
VCV 30 mg5264808980

[back to top]

Number of Participants With AIDS-defining Events (ADEs)

The number of participants with ADEs is reported. An ADE is an SAE that is expected in the course of disease and not considered related to study intervention. The sponsor identified events that met ADE criteria based on the 1993 Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Revised Classification System. (NCT00686829)
Timeframe: Up to discontinuation of commercial VCV availability (up to approximately 5.5 years)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Plasmablastic LymphomaKaposi's Sarcoma
VCV 30 mg11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With New Infections

The number of participants with new infections is reported. (NCT00686829)
Timeframe: Up to discontinuation of commercial VCV availability (up to approximately 5.5 years)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Herpes simplex virus infectionUpper respiratory tract infection
VCV 30 mg639

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Reduced Susceptibility to VCV

The total number of participants with viruses having phenotypic resistance to VCV is reported. Viruses exhibiting both maximum percent inhibition (MPI) plateau values of <85% and relative MPI (R-MPI) values of <0.9 (based on the PhenoSense HIV entry assay) were considered to have phenotypic resistance to VCV. (NCT00686829)
Timeframe: Up to time of VF in P4100, assessed up to approximately 5.5 years

InterventionParticipants (Number)
VCV 30 mg7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Therapy Due to AEs

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, biologic (at any dose), or medical device, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. (NCT00686829)
Timeframe: Up to discontinuation of commercial VCV availability (up to approximately 5.5 years)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
VCV 30 mg6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥1 Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, biologic (at any dose), or medical device, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. (NCT00686829)
Timeframe: Up to discontinuation of commercial VCV availability (up to approximately 5.5 years)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
VCV 30 mg91

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Coreceptor Tropism Shifts From Baseline

The number of participants with non reportable (NR) tropism, CCR5 (R5) tropism, or dual/mixed CCR5/CXCR4 (DM/X4) tropism at baseline, who had NR, R5, or DM/X4 tropism at the time of virologic failure (VF) is reported. The definition of VF is an increase in HIV RNA level >0.5 log10 copies/mL compared to the baseline HIV RNA level. (NCT00686829)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 48 of ACTG study A5211) and time of VF in P4100, assessed up to approximately 5.5 years

InterventionParticipants (Number)
NR Baseline to NR VFNR at Baseline to R5 VFNR Baseline to DM/X4 VFR5 baseline to R5 VFR5 baseline to NR VFR5 baseline to DM/X4 VFDM/X4 baseline to DM/X4 VFDM/X4 baseline to R5 VF
VCV 30 mg45105113131

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥1 Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An SAE is any adverse occurrence that results in death; is life-threatening; results in a persistent disability; requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongs hospitalization; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. (NCT00686829)
Timeframe: Up to discontinuation of commercial VCV availability (up to approximately 5.5 years)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
VCV 30 mg48

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 AM at Week 6

Mean IOP at 8 AM at week 6. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. (NCT00735449)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Combigan®17.3
Timolol Maleate 0.5%17.8

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 AM at Week 12

Mean IOP at 8 AM at week 12. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. (NCT00735449)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Combigan®17.0
Timolol Maleate 0.5%17.7

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 10 AM at Week 6

Mean IOP at 10 AM at week 6. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. (NCT00735449)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Combigan®15.9
Timolol Maleate 0.5%16.7

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Adverse Events

Number of subjects with adverse events, defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject, during the study (reported through the week 12 visit). (NCT00735449)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Combigan®15
Timolol Maleate 0.5%13

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 10 AM at Week 12

Mean IOP at 10 AM at week 12. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure in the eye. (NCT00735449)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Combigan®15.1
Timolol Maleate 0.5%16.9

[back to top]

Stinging on Instillation

Assessed from subject response to survey question asking about tolerability of medicine upon instillation, using a 0 through 7 scale, with 0=complete comfort and 7=worst pain imaginable. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%0.6
Timolol Maleate 0.5%1.0
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%0.6

[back to top]

Intraoclular Pressure

(NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

Interventionmm of mercury (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%16.3
Timolol Maleate 0.5%16.2
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%16.2

[back to top]

Corneal Staining Grade

Assessed by the investigator using a slit lamp and Oxford Scheme, grading 0,1,2,3,4,5. The higher the grade the worse the staining. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%1.2
Timolol Maleate 0.5%1.1
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%1.0

[back to top]

Corneal Staining Count

Assessed by the investigator using a slit lamp, counting the number of spots. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

InterventionNumber of spots (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%10.5
Timolol Maleate 0.5%10.4
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%8.3

[back to top]

Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Grade

Assessed by investigator using a slit lamp and Oxford Scheme, grading 0,1,2,3,4,5 according to pictures provided. The higher the grade the worse the staining. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%0.8
Timolol Maleate 0.5%0.7
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%0.8

[back to top]

Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Count

Assessed by investigator using a slit lamp and counting number of spots. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

Interventionnumber of spots (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%4.7
Timolol Maleate 0.5%4.8
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%5.3

[back to top]

Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Count

Assessed by investigator using slit lamp and counting number of spots. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

Interventionnumber of spots (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%11.0
Timolol Maleate 0.5%10.3
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%12.9

[back to top]

Visual Acuity

The visual acuity score is a count of the number of letters the subject successfully read from the eye chart. The higher the score, the better the vision. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

Interventionnumber of letters (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%52.3
Timolol Maleate 0.5%52.5
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%51.4

[back to top]

Conjunctival Hyperemia

Assessed by investigator using a slit lamp and a photographic grading scale. Photographs were graded: grade 0, grade 1, grade 2, grade 3. The higher the graded the worse the hyperemia. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%0.2
Timolol Maleate 0.5%0.4
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%0.3

[back to top]

Basic Schirmer's

Schirmer's measures basic tear function. The higher the number, the less dry the eye. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

Interventionmm of moisture (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%17.7
Timolol Maleate 0.5%14.8
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%15.4

[back to top]

Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Grade

Assessed by investigator using a slit lamp and the Oxford Scheme, grading 0,1,2,3,4,5 according to pictures provided. The higher the grade the worse the staining. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%1.2
Timolol Maleate 0.5%1.1
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%1.3

[back to top]

Tear Film Break-up Time

(NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

InterventionSeconds (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%8.5
Timolol Maleate 0.5%7.7
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%8.5

[back to top]

Retrobulbar Blood Flow (End Diastolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Nasal Short Posterior Ciliary Artery

End diastolic velocity (EDV) of retrobulbar blood flow as measured by color Doppler imaging (CDI) in the nasal short posterior ciliary artery after 1 month of treatment. CDI is a high-resolution ultrasound system which provides visualization of the flow of blood through a vessel. EDV is the maximum blood flow speed within a vessel at the end of diastole (minimum pressure exerted in a blood vessel in between heart beats). (NCT00811850)
Timeframe: 1 Month

InterventionCentimeters per second (cm/s) (Mean)
Combigan®2.63
Cosopt®2.61

[back to top]

Retrobulbar Blood Flow (Peak Systolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Temporal Short Posterior Ciliary Artery

Peak systolic velocity (PSV) of retrobulbar blood as measured by color Doppler imaging (CDI) in the temporal short posterior ciliary artery after 1 month of treatment. CDI is a high-resolution ultrasound system which provides visualization of the flow of blood through a vessel. PSV is the maximum blood flow speed within a vessel at the time of systole (maximum pressure exerted in the blood vessel). (NCT00811850)
Timeframe: 1 Month

InterventionCentimeters per second (cm/s) (Mean)
Combigan®8.52
Cosopt®8.84

[back to top]

Retrobulbar Blood Flow (Peak Systolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Ophthalmic Artery

Peak systolic velocity (PSV) of retrobulbar blood flow as measured by color Doppler imaging (CDI) in the ophthalmic artery after 1 month of treatment. CDI is a high-resolution ultrasound system which provides visualization of the flow of blood through a vessel. PSV is the maximum blood flow speed within a vessel at the time of systole (maximum pressure exerted in a blood vessel). (NCT00811850)
Timeframe: 1 Month

InterventionCentimeters per second (cm/s) (Mean)
Combigan®24.5
Cosopt®22.09

[back to top]

Retrobulbar Blood Flow (Peak Systolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Nasal Short Posterior Ciliary Artery

Peak systolic velocity (PSV) of retrobulbar blood flow as measured by color Doppler imaging (CDI) in the nasal short posterior ciliary artery after 1 month of treatment. CDI is a high-resolution ultrasound system which provides visualization of the flow of blood through a vessel. PSV is the maximum blood flow speed within a vessel at the time of systole (maximum pressure exerted in a blood vessel). (NCT00811850)
Timeframe: 1 Month

InterventionCentimeters per second (cm/s) (Mean)
Combigan®8.61
Cosopt®8.02

[back to top]

Retrobulbar Blood Flow (End Diastolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Central Retinal Artery

End diastolic velocity (EDV) of retrobulbar blood flow as measured by color Doppler imaging (CDI) in the central retinal artery after 1 month of treatment. CDI is a high-resolution ultrasound system which provides visualization of the flow of blood through a vessel. EDV is the maximum blood flow speed within a vessel at the end of diastole (minimum pressure exerted in a blood vessel in between heart beats). (NCT00811850)
Timeframe: 1 Month

InterventionCentimeters per second (cm/s) (Mean)
Combigan®2.73
Cosopt®2.75

[back to top]

Retrobulbar Blood Flow (Peak Systolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Central Retinal Artery

Peak systolic velocity (PSV) of retrobulbar blood flow as measured by color Doppler imaging (CDI) in the central retinal artery after 1 month of treatment. CDI is a high-resolution ultrasound system which provides visualization of the flow of blood through a vessel. PSV is the maximum blood flow speed within a vessel at the time of systole (maximum pressure exerted in a blood vessel). (NCT00811850)
Timeframe: 1 Month

InterventionCentimeters per second (cm/s) (Mean)
Combigan®8.86
Cosopt®8.81

[back to top]

Retrobulbar Blood Flow (End Diastolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Temporal Short Posterior Ciliary Artery

End diastolic velocity (EDV) of retrobulbar blood flow as measured by color Doppler imaging (CDI) in the temporal short posterior ciliary artery after 1 month of treatment. CDI is a high-resolution ultrasound system which provides visualization of the flow of blood through a vessel. EDV is the maximum blood flow speed within a vessel at the end of diastole (minimum pressure exerted in a blood vessel in between heart beats). (NCT00811850)
Timeframe: 1 Month

InterventionCentimeters per second (cm/s) (Mean)
Combigan®2.73
Cosopt®2.87

[back to top]

Retrobulbar Blood Flow (End Diastolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Ophthalmic Artery

End diastolic velocity (EDV) of retrobulbar blood flow as measured by color Doppler imaging (CDI) in the ophthalmic artery after 1 month of treatment. CDI is a high-resolution ultrasound system which provides visualization of the flow through a vessel. EDV is the maximum blood flow speed within a vessel at the end of diastole (minimum pressure exerted in a blood vessel in between heart beats). (NCT00811850)
Timeframe: 1 Month

InterventionCentimeters per second (cm/s) (Mean)
Combigan®5.83
Cosopt®5.18

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Using Rescue Medication During Each 7 Day Treatment Period

Patients recorded use of rescue medication (salbutamol/albuterol multi-dose inhaler) as the number of puffs taken in respective preceding 12 hours morning and evening in a diary. Patient with any use of rescue medication (any number of puffs > 0) was included to calculate endpoint. (NCT00927901)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of each treatment period (Day 7)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Indacaterol Maleate 400 μg21
Indacaterol Acetate 400 μg10
Indacaterol Xinafoate 400 μg17
Placebo to Indacaterol21

[back to top]

Time to Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) on Day 1 and Day 7

FEV1 was measured with spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards at 5, 15, and 30 minutes; 1 hour, 1 hour 30 minutes; and 2, 4, and 12 hours post-dose on Day 1 and Day 7. (NCT00927901)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 7

,,,
InterventionHours (Median)
Day 1, N=29, 30, 29, 29Day 7, N=28, 29, 28, 29
Indacaterol Acetate 400 μg2.132.50
Indacaterol Maleate 400 μg4.003.00
Indacaterol Xinafoate 400 μg1.503.00
Placebo to Indacaterol2.2512.38

[back to top]

Indacaterol Exposure (Cmax) at the End of Each 7 Day Treatment Period

Venous blood samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were collected at 15 and 30 minutes; and 1, 2, 4, 12, and 24 hours post-dose at the end of each 7 day treatment period and were analyzed using a LC-MS/MS assay. Maximum (peak) plasma drug concentration after drug administration (Cmax) was calculated from concentration-time data and recorded sampling times using non-compartmental methods. (NCT00927901)
Timeframe: End of each treatment period (Day 7)

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Indacaterol Acetate 400 μg720
Indacaterol Maleate 400 μg753
Indacaterol Xinafoate 400 μg664

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) 24 Hours Post-dose at the End of Each Treatment Period (Day 7)

FEV1 was measured with spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Trough FEV1 was defined as the average of measurements made 23 hours 10 minutes and 23 hours 45 minutes post-dose at Baseline and at the end of each treatment period. The analysis included period baseline FEV1 as covariate. (NCT00927901)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of each treatment period (Day 7)

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol Maleate 400 μg0.186
Indacaterol Acetate 400 μg0.190
Indacaterol Xinafoate 400 μg0.194
Placebo to Indacaterol-0.021

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) 24 Hours Post-dose on Day 1

FEV1 was measured with spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Trough FEV1 was defined as the average of measurements made 23 hours 10 minutes and 23 hours 45 minutes post-dose at Baseline and on Day 1. The analysis included period baseline FEV1 as covariate. (NCT00927901)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol Maleate 400 μg0.161
Indacaterol Acetate 400 μg0.185
Indacaterol Xinafoate 400 μg0.205
Placebo to Indacaterol0.008

[back to top]

Indacaterol Exposure (AUC[0-24 Hours]) at the End of Each 7 Day Treatment Period

Venous blood samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were collected at 15 and 30 minutes; and 1, 2, 4, 12, and 24 hours post-dose at the end of each 7 day treatment period and were analyzed using a LC-MS/MS assay. Area under the concentration-time curve up to 24 hours (AUC[0-24 hours]) was calculated from concentration-time data and recorded sampling times using non-compartmental methods. (NCT00927901)
Timeframe: End of each treatment period (Day 7)

Interventionpg * hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Indacaterol Acetate 400 μg5159
Indacaterol Maleate 400 μg5434
Indacaterol Xinafoate 400 μg5170

[back to top]

Overall Survival

The length of time from the start of treatment for a disease, such as cancer, to the date in which the patients diagnosed with the disease were still alive. (NCT01011439)
Timeframe: Every 6 weeks during Follow-Up until PD or new therapy start; every 6 months thereafter, up to 2 years from the last dose of study drug.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Milciclib Maleate (PHA-848125AC)24.18

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Assessed in patients achieving a confirmed objective tumor response by RECIST version 1.1 criteria. (NCT01011439)
Timeframe: Assessments were made every 6 weeks from start date until PD to a maximum duration of 242 weeks or until PD.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Milciclib Maleate (PHA-848125AC)8.41

[back to top]

Overall Safety Profile (Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) and Hematological and Blood Chemistry Parameters)

"The adverse events (AEs) were coded with the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) and their severity graded according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. The following subsets of AEs were considered: serious AEs, AEs with CTCAE grade 3-5, AEs with a relationship to study treatment classified by the Investigator as possible or probable or definite and AEs reported as leading to discontinuation from treatment.~Laboratory test values were graded according to the NCI CTCAE scale, v3.0, whenever possible. For each laboratory test included in the NCI CTCAE system, the incidence of abnormalities was evaluated by considering the worst occurrence for each patient throughout the whole treatment period." (NCT01011439)
Timeframe: Adverse events: from date treatment consent signed to 28 days after last dose of study drug; hematology/blood chemistry tests: at baseline and between Day 11-14 of each cycle of a total of 135 two-week cycles.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
N° patients with Adverse EventsN° patients with abnormal Hematology testN° patients with abnormal Blood Chemistry test
Milciclib Maleate (PHA-848125AC)727070

[back to top]

Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Point and 95% confidence interval estimates was calculated for the objective tumor response rate (confirmed CRs or PRs). The determination of antitumor efficacy was based on objective tumor assessments made according to the RECIST guideline (version 1.1) The analysis was performed in the evaluable population. (NCT01011439)
Timeframe: Assessments were made every 6 weeks from start date until PD to a maximum duration of 242 weeks or until PD.

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Milciclib Maleate (PHA-848125AC)3.7

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate

Point and 95% confidence interval estimates was calculated for the disease control rate (confirmed CRs / PRs and SD>/= 6 weeks). The analysis was performed in the evaluable populations. (NCT01011439)
Timeframe: Assessments were made every 6 weeks from start date until PD to a maximum duration of 242 weeks or until PD.

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Milciclib Maleate (PHA-848125AC)75.9

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

The length of time during and after the treatment of a disease, such as cancer, that a patient lives with the disease but it does not get worse. In a clinical trial, measuring the progression-free survival is one way to see how well a new treatment works. (NCT01011439)
Timeframe: Assessments were made every 6 weeks from start date until PD to a maximum duration of 242 weeks or until PD.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Milciclib Maleate (PHA-848125AC)6.83

[back to top]

6-month Progression-free Survival Rate

Six-month progression-free survival is the rate of patients who have NOT progressed at six months, where progressive disease is defined as any of the following: ≥ 25% increase in sum of the products of perpendicular diameters of enhancing lesions; any new lesion; or clinical deterioration. Progression will be determined by central review of MRI exams, assessed using MacDonald criteria for progression versus response on 2D T1 and T2 weighted images. (NCT01062425)
Timeframe: From randomization to 6 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo, TMZ, and RT24.5
Cediranib, TMZ, and RT46.6

[back to top]

Incidence of Grade 3+ Toxicities

The number of patients with reported grade 3 and higher treatment-related toxicities as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (NCT01062425)
Timeframe: From randomization to six months.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo, TMZ, and RT35
Cediranib, TMZ, and RT77

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences between treatment arms will be tested using the log rank test. Multivariate analyses with the Cox proportional hazard model for OS will be performed with the stratification variables as fixed variables to assess the treatment effect adjusting patient-specific risk factors. (NCT01062425)
Timeframe: From randomization to time of death due to any cause. Patients are followed until death. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for six months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Placebo, TMZ, and RT13.8
Cediranib, TMZ, and RT14.5

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival time is defined as time from randomization to date of first progression or death from any cause and is estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients last known to be alive without progression are censored at the date of last contact. Progression is defined as any of the following: ≥ 25% increase in sum of the products of perpendicular diameters of enhancing lesions; any new lesion; or clinical deterioration. (NCT01062425)
Timeframe: From randomization to time of first progression or death due to any cause. Patients are followed until death. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for six months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Placebo, TMZ, and RT2.7
Cediranib, TMZ, and RT6.2

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate by Modified RECIST (Phase II)

"Per modified RECIST for Pleural Tumors. In addition to RECIST1.1, for modified RECIST, measurements based on the sum of 6 CT cuts in the pleural perpendicular to the chest wall are applied to standard RECIST criterial (sum of 6 = one univariate diameter). Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all measurable and non-measurable disease; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (STA), does not qualify for CR, PR, Progression or Symptomatic Deterioration. Disease Control Rate (DCR) = CR + PR + STA.~All target measurable lesions must be assessed using the same techniques as baseline." (NCT01064648)
Timeframe: Disease assessment will be repeated every 6 weeks until disease progression, up to 3 years.Disease control is documented for as long as the patient remains on protocol treatment.

Interventionpercentage of analyzed participants (Number)
Phase II Cisplatin-pemetrexed Cediranib 20mg75
Phase II Cisplatin-pemetrexed Placebo83

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Response Rate by RECIST1.1 (Phase II)

"Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1): Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all measurable and non-measurable disease; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.~All target measurable lesions must be assessed using the same techniques as baseline." (NCT01064648)
Timeframe: Disease assessment will be repeated every 6 weeks until disease progression, up to 3 years. Best response is documented for as long as the patient remains on protocol treatment.

Interventionpercentage of analyzed participants (Number)
Phase II Cisplatin-pemetrexed Cediranib 20mg26
Phase II Cisplatin-pemetrexed Placebo15

[back to top]

Response Rate by Modified RECIST (Phase II)

"Per modified RECIST for Pleural Tumors. In addition to RECIST1.1, for modified RECIST, measurements based on the sum of 6 CT cuts in the pleural perpendicular to the chest wall are applied to standard RECIST criterial (sum of 6 = one univariate diameter). Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all measurable and non-measurable disease; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.~All target measurable lesions must be assessed using the same techniques as baseline." (NCT01064648)
Timeframe: Disease assessment will be repeated every 6 weeks until disease progression, up to 3 years.Best response is documented for as long as the patient remains on protocol treatment.

Interventionpercentage of analyzed participants (Number)
Phase II Cisplatin-pemetrexed Cediranib 20mg50
Phase II Cisplatin-pemetrexed Placebo20

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (Phase II)

From date of registration to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive and progression free are censored at date of last contact. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v 1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01064648)
Timeframe: From date of registration to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 5 years.Disease assessment will be repeated every 6 weeks until disease progression.

Interventionmonth (Median)
Phase II Cisplatin-pemetrexed Cediranib 20mg7.2
Phase II Cisplatin-pemetrexed Placebo5.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival (Phase II)

From date of registration to date of death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive are censored at date of last contact. (NCT01064648)
Timeframe: From date of registration to death.Disease assessment will be repeated every 6 weeks until disease progression. After progression, follow up will occur every 6 months for the first two years and then at the end of the third year after registration.

Interventionmonth (Median)
Phase II Cisplatin-pemetrexed Cediranib 20mg10
Phase II Cisplatin-pemetrexed Placebo8.5

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of Cediranib in Combination With Cisplatin and Pemetrexed (Phase I)

"MTD was determined by testing dose-de-escalation to 20mg PO daily on dose de-escalation cohort 1 to 2 with 3 to 6 patients each. MTD reflects the highest dose of drug that did not cause a Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) in > 33% of participants. Toxicities will be graded according to the CTEP Active Version of the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) apply only during Cycle 1 and must be drug-related (i.e. possibly, probably or definitely related to one of the 3 study drugs). The following events occurring in the first cycle of treatment are considered dose limiting.~Febrile neutropenia~Grade 4 neutrophil count decrease for more than 7 days' duration~Grade 4 platelet count decrease~Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity (excluding alopecia)" (NCT01064648)
Timeframe: Weekly during first cycle (1cycle = 21 days). Then will be reported every cycle while patient is on treatment.

Interventionmg (Number)
All Phase I Participants20

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate by RECIST 1.1 (Phase II)

"Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1): Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all measurable and non-measurable disease; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (STA): Does not qualify for CR, PR, Progression or Symptomatic Deterioration. Disease Control Rate (DCR) = CR + PR + STA~All target measurable lesions must be assessed using the same techniques as baseline." (NCT01064648)
Timeframe: Disease assessment will be repeated every 6 weeks until disease progression, up to 3 years.Disease control rate is documented for as long as the patient remains on protocol treatment.

Interventionpercentage of analyzed participants (Number)
Phase II Cisplatin-pemetrexed Cediranib 20mg74
Phase II Cisplatin-pemetrexed Placebo80

[back to top]

The Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cediranib in Combination With Olaparib Tablet Formulation in the Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer (Phase I-T).

The Phase 1-T component of this trial employed a 3+3 design, escalating on 0/3 or 1/6 DLT, and de-escalating if 2 DLTs were encountered. The MTD (maximum tolerated dose) was the dose at which no more than 1 patient developed a DLT when at least 6 patients had been treated. (NCT01116648)
Timeframe: At 28 days

Interventionmg (Number)
Cediranib PO dailyOlaparib (tablet) PO BID
All Phase 1-T Participants30200

[back to top]

The Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cediranib in Combination With Olaparib in the Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer or Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer (Phase I)

This trial employed a 3+3 design, escalating on 0/3 or 1/6 DLT, and de-escalating if 2 DLTs were encountered. The MTD (maximum tolerated dose) was the dose at which no more than 1 patient developed a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) when at least 6 patients had been treated. (NCT01116648)
Timeframe: At 28 Days

Interventionmg (Number)
Cediranib PO dailyOlaparib PO BID
All Phase 1 Participants (28 Participants)30200

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) at the Maximum Tolerated Dose/Recommended Phase 2 Dose of Cediranib Maleate With Olaparib Compared to That of Olaparib Alone (Phase II)

"Evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test for between group comparison, and median survival times reported.~PFS is defined as time from randomization to investigator-assessed radiographic progression by RECIST 1.1 criteria or death.~Patients alive without evidence of progression were censored at the last disease assessment." (NCT01116648)
Timeframe: Time from start of treatment to time of objective disease progression, assessed up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2 - Olaparib Alone (46 Participants)8.2
Phase 2 - Cediranib/Olaparib (44 Participants)16.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities of Cediranib Maleate in Combination With Olaparib (Phase I)

Was determined using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (NCT01116648)
Timeframe: At 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Level 00
Level 10
Level 20
Level 32

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Effects as Assessed by the National Cancer Institute CTCAE v. 4.0

Adverse Events (Grade 3 or higher) (NCT01132820)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
LeukopeniaThrombocytopeniaNeutropeniaAnemiaOther InvestigationsOther Blood/LymphaticsCardiacEar and labyrinthEndocrineEyeNauseaVomitingOther GastrointestinalGeneral and administration siteHepatobiliaryInfections/infestationsInjury/poisoningMetabolism/nutritionMusculoskeletal/connective tissueNeoplasms benign/malignantPeripheral sensory neuropathyNervous systemPsychiatricRenal/urinaryReproductive/breastRespiratory/thoracic/mediastinalSkin/subcutaneousVascular disorders
Cediranib0003411000141613060834011314018

[back to top]

Tumor Response

Complete and Partial Tumor Response by RECIST 1.1. Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01132820)
Timeframe: For diesease evaluated by physical examination, response was assessed prior to each cycle. CT scan or MRI if used to follow lesion for measurable disease every other cycle from enrollment until stopping study therapy. The average time on study is 3 mnths

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cediranib12.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

The observed length of life from entry into the study to death or the date of last contact. (NCT01132820)
Timeframe: From study entry to death or last contact, up to 5 years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cediranib12.5

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Time until disease progression, death, or date of last contact. (NCT01132820)
Timeframe: Disease that can be assessed by physical exam should be evaluated every cycle. disease assessed by imaging should be evaluated every other cycle. Time frame to determine the date of progression is from the date of enrollment up to 5 years after enrollment

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cediranib3.61

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) = > 6 Months

Number of participants who survived for at least 6 months. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v.1.0) as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01132820)
Timeframe: For disease evaluated by physical examination, progression was assessed prior to each cycle. CT scan or MRI if used to follow lesion for measurable disease every other cycle. Evaluated from time of enrollment until progression or death, up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cediranib33.3

[back to top]

Response Without Regard to the Time of Documented Response

Complete and partial tumor response by RECIST 1.1 (NCT01132820)
Timeframe: Tumor responses with time restriction starts at enrollment and goes to 6 months after enrollment or until pt. off study therapy,whichever occurs first. Without time restriction starts at enrollment,lasts until off study therapy, median duration = 2.63 mth

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cediranib12.5

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by CT or MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01208051)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Level 00
Dose Level +12
Dose Level +24
Phase II Arm A (Cediranib Maleate)17
Phase II Arm B (Cediranib Maleate Plus Lenalidomide)30

[back to top]

Dose Limiting Toxicity

"Dose limiting toxicity was defined as any of the following occurring during the first cycle (28 days) of therapy:~Hematological toxicities:~Any grade 4 neutropenia (ANC < 500) lasting more than 5 days~Any grade 4 neutropenia with concomitant fever (temperature > 38.5)~Any grade 4 neutropenia and sepsis or other severe infection~Any grade 4 thrombocytopenia~Any other grade 3-4 non-hematological adverse drug reactions, except untreated nausea/vomiting, or hypersensitivity reactions.~Grade 4 hypertension~Grade 4 proteinuria Delay in the administration of a subsequent dose of cediranib and lenalidomide exceeding 2 weeks, due to an adverse drug reaction" (NCT01208051)
Timeframe: 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I Dose Level 00
Phase I Dose Level +11
Phase I Dose Level +22

[back to top]

Overall Survival (Final Results After Crossover)

Time from randomization to death from any cause. Patients who have not died are censored as of the date last known alive. (NCT01208051)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose Level 0NA
Dose Level +160.0
Dose Level +2100
Phase II Arm A (Cediranib Maleate)64.8
Phase II Arm B (Cediranib Maleate Plus Lenalidomide)75.3

[back to top]

Percent Change in Tumor Size (Phase II)

The percent change in tumor size from baseline to the end of cycle 2 (two months). The post-treatment total sum of lengths for a patient with a new lesion at cycle 2 will be scored as 1.2*max(pre-sum, post-sum) to ensure that the appearance of new lesions corresponds to a disease progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. In the event of any early deaths prior to cycle 2, a nonparametric rank sum test will be used with deaths ranked at the extreme end of the distribution. (NCT01208051)
Timeframe: From baseline to 2 months

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Phase II Arm A (Cediranib Maleate)-12.5
Phase II Arm B (Cediranib Maleate Plus Lenalidomide)-4.2

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (Final Results After Crossover)

Time from study enrollment until disease progression or death from any cause. Surviving patients without progression are censored as of the date of the last negative examination. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01208051)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dose Level 0NA
Dose Level +114.8
Dose Level +223.6
Phase II Arm A (Cediranib Maleate)14.8
Phase II Arm B (Cediranib Maleate Plus Lenalidomide)11.3

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (Phase II Futility Analysis)

Time from enrollment on study to disease progression or death from any cause. Surviving patients without progression are censored as of the date of the last negative examination. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. This analysis corresponds to the planned futility analysis after 40 events. (NCT01208051)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II Arm A (Cediranib Maleate)20.9
Phase II Arm B (Cediranib Maleate Plus Lenalidomide Thru April 10, 2015)10.6

[back to top]

Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) and Hematological and Blood Chemistry Parameters

"The adverse events (AEs) were coded with the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) and their severity graded according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. The following subsets of AEs were considered: serious AEs, AEs with CTCAE grade 3-5, AEs with a relationship to study treatment classified by the Investigator as possible or probable or definite and AEs reported as leading to discontinuation from treatment.~Laboratory test values were graded according to the NCI CTCAE scale, v3.0, whenever possible. For each laboratory test included in the NCI CTCAE system, the incidence of abnormalities were evaluated by considering the worst occurrence for each patient throughout the whole treatment period." (NCT01301391)
Timeframe: Adverse events: from date treatment consent signed to 28 days after last treatment; hematology/blood chemistry tests: at baseline and between Day 11-14 of each cycle of a maximum total of 48 two-week cycles.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
N° patients with Adverse EventsN° patients with abnormal Hematology testN° patients with abnormal Blood chemistry test
Milciclib302827

[back to top]

Overall Survival

The length of time from either the date of diagnosis or the start of treatment for a disease, such as cancer, and to the date in which the patients diagnosed with the disease are still alive. Kaplan-Meier estimates as percentage of patients alive. (NCT01301391)
Timeframe: Every 6 weeks during Follow-Up until PD or new therapy start; every 6 months thereafter, up to 2 years from the last dose of study drug.

Interventionpercentage of patients dead at 21 months (Number)
Milciclib41.666

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Point and 95% confidence interval estimates was calculated for the objective tumor response rate (confirmed CRs or PRs). The determination of antitumor efficacy was based on objective tumor assessments made according to the RECIST guideline (version 1.1). The analysis was performed in the evaluable population. (NCT01301391)
Timeframe: Assessments were made every 6 weeks from start date until PD or up to a maximum duration of 134 weeks.

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Milciclib4.2

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Calculated in patients achieving a confirmed objective tumor response by RECIST version 1.1 criteria. (NCT01301391)
Timeframe: Assessments were made every 6 weeks from start date until PD or up to a maximum duration of 134 weeks.

InterventionMonths (Number)
Milciclib2.76

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (ORR+SD Rate)

Point and 95% confidence interval estimates was calculated for the disease control rate (confirmed CRs / PRs and SD > or = 6 weeks). The analysis was performed in the evaluable patient populations. (NCT01301391)
Timeframe: Assessments were made every 6 weeks from start date until PD or up to a maximum duration of 134 weeks.

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Milciclib83.3

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

The length of time during and after the treatment of a disease, such as cancer, that a patient lives with the disease but it does not get worse. In a clinical trial, measuring the progression-free survival is one way to see how well a new treatment works. (NCT01301391)
Timeframe: Assessments were made every 6 weeks from start date until PD or up to a maximum duration of 134 weeks.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Milciclib9.76

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Rate at 3 Months

The proportion of successes (i.e. patients alive and progression-free at 3 months since treatment start) out of the total number of evaluable patients. (NCT01301391)
Timeframe: 3 months since treatment start

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SuccessFailure
Milciclib1311

[back to top]

AUC0-infinity of Metformin Hydrochloride

The area under the plot of plasma concentration of drug against time after drug administration is defined as the area under the curve (AUC). The AUC0-infinity is calculated from time 0 (prior to administration of medication) to infinity (the time of complete elimination of the drug). The AUC is of particular use in estimating the bioavailability of drugs, by measuring the extent of absorption. (NCT01332071)
Timeframe: Day 1 (day that blood collection started) and Day 2 (Period 1) and Days 8 and 9 (Period 2)

Interventionng.h/ml (Mean)
Test Product10419.8
Reference Product11063.7

[back to top]

AUC0-infinity of Rosiglitazone Maleate

The area under the plot of plasma concentration of drug against time after drug administration is defined as the area under the curve (AUC). The AUC0-infinity is calculated from time 0 (prior to administration of medication) to infinity (the time of complete elimination of the drug). The AUC is of particular use in estimating the bioavailability of drugs, by measuring the extent of absorption. (NCT01332071)
Timeframe: Day 1 (day that blood collection started) and Day 2 (Period 1) and Days 8 and 9 (Period 2)

Interventionng.h/ml (Mean)
Test Product1776.28
Reference Product1825.35

[back to top]

AUC0-t of Metformin Hydrochloride

The area under the plot of plasma concentration of drug against time after drug administration is defined as the area under the curve (AUC). The AUC0-t is calculated from time 0 (prior to administration of medication) to time t (the time of the last quantifiable concentration). The AUC is of particular use in estimating the bioavailability of drugs, by measuring the extent of absorption. ng, nanograms; ml, milliliter. (NCT01332071)
Timeframe: Day 1 (day that blood collection started) and Day 2 (Period 1) and Days 8 and 9 (Period 2)

Interventionng.h/ml (Mean)
Test Product9623.4
Reference Product10074.4

[back to top]

AUC0-t of Rosiglitazone Maleate

The area under the plot of plasma concentration of drug against time after drug administration is defined as the area under the curve (AUC). The AUC 0-t is calculated from time 0 (prior to administration of medication) to time t (the time of the last quantifiable concentration). The AUC is of particular use in estimating the bioavailability of drugs, by measuring the extent of absorption. ng, nanograms; ml, milliliter. (NCT01332071)
Timeframe: Day 1 (day that blood collection started) and Day 2 (Period 1) and Days 8 and 9 (Period 2)

Interventionng per hour per ml (ng.h/ml) (Mean)
Test Product1731.22
Reference Product1770.93

[back to top]

Cmax of Metformin Hydrochloride

"Cmax is defined as the maximum or peak concentration of a drug observed after its administration. Cmax is one of the parameters of particular use in estimating the bioavailability of drugs, by measuring the total amount of drug absorbed." (NCT01332071)
Timeframe: Day 1 (day that blood collection started) and Day 2 (Period 1) and Days 8 and 9 (Period 2)

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Test Product1623.6
Reference Product1663.9

[back to top]

Cmax of Rosiglitazone Maleate

"Cmax is defined as the maximum or peak concentration of a drug observed after its administration. Cmax is one of the parameters of particular use in estimating the bioavailability of drugs, by measuring the total amount of drug absorbed." (NCT01332071)
Timeframe: Day 1 (day that blood collection started) and Day 2 (Period 1) and Days 8 and 9 (Period 2)

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Test Product265.45
Reference Product270.97

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Local Platelet Count for the 6 Month Treatment Period

Platelet responses to avatrombopag was evaluated using the platelet counts determined at local clinical laboratories. Only participants with non-missing data at both baseline and the relevant post-baseline visit are included in the change from baseline summary statistics. Standard deviation is not applicable for some of the categories, from Visit 14 to Visit 22, as the number of participants analyzed for that visit was 1 individual. (NCT01433978)
Timeframe: Day 5, Day 8, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 10, Week 12, Week 14, Week 16, Week 18, Week 19, Week 20, Week 22, Week 23, Week 24, Week 25, Week 26

Interventioncells x 10^9/L (Geometric Mean)
Visit 3 (Day 5)Visit 4 (Day 8)Visit 5 (Week 2)Visit 6 (Week 3)Visit 7 (Week 4)Visit 8 (Week 6)Visit 9 (Week 8)Visit 10 (Week 10)Visit 11 (Week 12)Visit 12 (Week 14 )Visit 13 (Week 16)Visit 14 (Week 18)Visit 15 (Week 19)
Eltrombopag (Core Study)8.6032.5073.4167.2028.7257.2167.2592.6787.33104.3347.75107.5013.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Local Platelet Count for the 6 Month Treatment Period

Platelet responses to avatrombopag was evaluated using the platelet counts determined at local clinical laboratories. Only participants with non-missing data at both baseline and the relevant post-baseline visit are included in the change from baseline summary statistics. Standard deviation is not applicable for some of the categories, from Visit 14 to Visit 22, as the number of participants analyzed for that visit was 1 individual. (NCT01433978)
Timeframe: Day 5, Day 8, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 10, Week 12, Week 14, Week 16, Week 18, Week 19, Week 20, Week 22, Week 23, Week 24, Week 25, Week 26

Interventioncells x 10^9/L (Geometric Mean)
Visit 3 (Day 5)Visit 4 (Day 8)Visit 5 (Week 2)Visit 6 (Week 3)Visit 7 (Week 4)Visit 8 (Week 6)Visit 9 (Week 8)Visit 10 (Week 10)Visit 11 (Week 12)Visit 12 (Week 14 )Visit 13 (Week 16)Visit 14 (Week 18)Visit 15 (Week 19)Visit 16 (Week 20)Visit 18 (Week 22)Visit 19 (Week 23)Visit 20 (Week 24)Visit 21 (Week 25)Visit 22 (Week 26)
Avatrombopag (Core Study)12.8547.00171.71114.21108.79150.68121.31126.25185.10159.38123.8846.5029.5050.5075.50104.50106.50120.5058.50

[back to top]

Number of Weeks With Platelet Count Greater Than or Equal to 50 x 10^9/L During 6-Month Treatment Period

The cumulative number of weeks of platelet response is defined as the total numbers of weeks in which the platelet count is greater than or equal to 50 x 10^ 9/L during 6 months of treatment of core study in the absence of rescue therapy. (NCT01438840)
Timeframe: Week 1 to Week 26

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Placebo (Core Study)0
Avatrombopag (Core Study)12.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Reduction in Use of Concomitant Immune/Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Medication

Only participants on concomitant ITP medications at baseline were included. (NCT01438840)
Timeframe: Week 1 through Week 26

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
YesNo
Avatrombopag (Core Study)510
Placebo (Core Study)07

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Platelet Count Greater Than or Equal to 50 x 10^9/L at Day 8

Participants with platelet response at Day 8 are defined as those who had a platelet count greater than or equal to 50 x 10^9/L at day 8 in the absence of rescue therapy on or before Day 8. (NCT01438840)
Timeframe: Week 1 (Day 8)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
YesNo
Avatrombopag (Core Study)2111
Placebo (Core Study)017

[back to top]

Standardized FEV1 AUC Between Baseline (Pre-dose) and 12 Hour Post-dose (AUC0-12h)

Spirometry was conducted according to internationally accepted standards at predose, 5 , 15 and 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 hours post-dose on Day 1 and Day 7. The standardized (with respect to the length of time) area under the curve (AUC) for FEV1 was calculated using trapezoidal rule between 5 min and 12 h post. Analysis of covariance with treatment, period, sequence and subject nested within sequence as fixed effects and FEV1 period baseline as a covariate. (NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 7

,,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Day 7 (n=31,29,30,31)
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)2.872.91
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)2.902.93
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)2.942.92
Placebo2.682.70

[back to top]

Standardized FEV1 AUC Between Baseline (Pre-dose) and 4 Hour Post-dose (AUC0-4h)

Spirometry was conducted according to internationally accepted standards at predose, 5, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2 and 4 hours post-dose on Day 1 and Day 7. The standardized (with respect to the length of time) area under the curve (AUC) for FEV1 was calculated using trapezoidal rule between 5 min and 4 h post. Analysis of Covariance with treatment, period, sequence and subject nested within sequence as fixed effects and period FEV1 baseline as a covariate. (NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 7

,,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Day 7 (n=33,30,32,33)
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)2.942.97
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)2.942.96
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)3.002.98
Placebo2.722.73

[back to top]

Time to Peak FEV1 at Day 1 and Day 7

Spirometry was performed according to internationally accepted standards. Time to the peak (maximum) FEV1 is recorded. Analysis of Covariance with treatment, period, sequence and subject nested within sequence as fixed effects and period FEV1 baseline as a covariate. (NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 7

,,,
InterventionHours (Median)
Day 1Day 7 (n=33,30,32,33)
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)3.003.00
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)3.983.00
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)3.023.05
Placebo3.003.97

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) After Drug Administration

(NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Day1, Day 7

,,
InterventionHours (Median)
Day 1 (n=31,30,31)Day 7 (n=33,31,31)
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)0.480.25
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)0.270.25
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)0.480.48

[back to top]

Peak Expiratory Flow Rate in the Morning in the Evening

PEFR was measured on all days from Screening Visit 2 to end of study visit: twice daily pre-dose (prior to Inhaled Corticosteroids) and approximately 12 hours post-dose (during the treatment period). Each subject was provided with a PEFR meter and recorded the PEFR readings in a daily diary. repeated measures. Analysis of covariance with treatment, period, sequence, day and treatment-day interaction as fixed effect and subject as a random effect and baseline PEFR as a covariate in the model. (NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Up to 101 days

,,,
InterventionLiters per second (Least Squares Mean)
MorningEvening
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)444.11463.28
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)451.33474.09
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)447.15464.39
Placebo421.58433.60

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety

Adverse event are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptoms, sign (including an abnormal lab finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or if present at baseline appear to worsen. Serious adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization , cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgments of the investigators represent significant hazards. Additional information about adverse events can be found in the Adverse Event section (NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Up to 101 days

InterventionParticipants (Number)
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)14
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)16
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)17
Placebo10

[back to top]

Number of Puffs of Rescue Medicine

Salbutamol (100 µg/puff) was used as rescued medicine. The total number of puffs per day was calculated and divided by the number of days with data to determine the mean daily number of puffs of rescue medication for each patient and was recorded in the patient diary from Baseline until Day 8 of Treatment Period 4. Analysis of covariance with treatment, period, sequence, and subject nested within sequence as fixed effect. (NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Up to 101 days

InterventionPuffs/day (Least Squares Mean)
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)1.98
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)1.90
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)1.91
Placebo1.94

[back to top]

Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) After 1 Day of Treatment

Spirometry was performed according to internationally accepted standards at Day 2. Trough FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Trough FEV1 was defined as the average of the FEV1 measurements at 23 hours 10 minutes and 23 hours 45 minutes post dose at Day 2. Analysis of Covariance with treatment, period, sequence and subject nested within sequence as fixed effects and period FEV1 baseline as a covariate. (NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Day 2

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)2.83
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)2.84
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)2.81
Placebo2.62

[back to top]

Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) After 7 Days of Treatment

Spirometry was performed according to internationally accepted standards at Day 8. Trough FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Trough FEV1 was defined as the average of the FEV1 measurements at 23 hours 10 minutes and 23 hours 45 minutes post dose.at Day 8. Analysis of Covariance with treatment, period, sequence and subject nested within sequence as fixed effects and period FEV1 baseline as a covariate. (NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Day 8

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)2.84
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)2.83
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)2.80
Placebo2.64

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve Pre-dose to 24 Hour Post Dose (AUC0-24h)

(NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 7

,,
Interventionhour*pg/mL (Mean)
Day 1 (n=30,30,27)Day 7 (n=33,31,31)
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)451952
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)5011110
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)8021770

[back to top]

FEV1 at Each Time-Point on Day 1 and Day 2

Spirometry was conducted according to internationally accepted standards post-dose at 0, 15 and 30 minutes; 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 hours on Day 1 and 23.16 and 23.75 hours on Day 2. FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. (NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 2

,,,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
0 minutes post-dose5 minutes post-dose30 minutes post-dose1 hour post-dose2 hours post-dose3 hours post-dose4 hours post-dose8 hours post-dose12 hours post-dose23.16 hours post-dose23.75 hours post-dose
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)2.682.902.932.953.023.053.002.892.852.832.85
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)2.612.852.862.892.982.982.992.802.742.812.89
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)2.652.972.963.033.063.093.072.992.922.852.88
Placebo2.672.662.702.732.822.802.772.702.712.592.68

[back to top]

FEV1 at Each Time-Point on Day 7 and Day 8

Spirometry was conducted according to internationally accepted standards at 0, 15 and 30 minutes; 1,2,3,4,8,12 hours on Day 7 and 23.16 and 23.75 hours on Day 8. FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. (NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Day 7, Day 8

,,,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
0 minutes post-dose15 minutes post-dose30 minutes post-dose1 hour post-dose2 hours post-dose3 hours post-dose4 hours post-dose8 hours post-dose12 hours post-dose23.16 hours post-dose23.75 hours post-dose
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)2.852.922.942.973.003.063.022.892.822.792.87
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)2.802.872.912.942.992.992.982.822.762.792.89
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)2.792.882.922.963.002.992.982.882.802.792.87
Placebo2.632.652.642.722.792.792.782.762.652.642.74

[back to top]

FEV1/FVC at Each Post-Dose Time Point on Day 1 and Day 2

Spirometry was conducted according to internationally accepted standards post-dose at 0, 15 and 30 minutes; 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 hours on Day 1 and 23.16 and 23.75 hours on Day 2. FEV1/FVC ratio is the percentage of the total FVC that is expelled from the lungs during the first second of forced exhalation. (NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Day1, Day 2

,,,
InterventionRatio (Mean)
0 minutes post-dose15 minutes post-dose30 minutes post-dose1 hour post-dose2 hours post-dose3 hours post-dose4 hours post-dose8 hours post-dose12 hours post-dose23.16 hours post-dose23.75 hours post-dose
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)0.640.670.670.680.680.690.680.670.660.660.66
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)0.630.670.670.670.680.680.680.670.660.650.66
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)0.620.660.660.670.670.680.670.660.660.640.65
Placebo0.630.630.650.640.650.650.650.640.640.620.63

[back to top]

FEV1/FVC at Each Post-dose Time Point on Day 7 and Day 8

Spirometry was conducted according to internationally accepted standards post-dose at 0, 15 and 30 minutes; 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 hours on Day 1 and 23.16 and 23.75 hours on Day 2 after treatment. FEV1/FVC ratio is the percentage of the total FVC that is expelled from the lungs during the first second of forced exhalation. (NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Day 7, Day 8

,,,
InterventionRatio (Mean)
0 minutes post-dose15 minutes post-dose30 minutes post-dose1 hour post-dose2 hours post-dose3 hours post-dose4 hours post-dose8 hours post-dose12 hours post-dose23.16 hours post-dose23.75 hours post-dose
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)0.650.670.670.670.680.690.680.670.660.650.66
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)0.650.660.670.670.680.680.680.660.660.640.65
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)0.650.660.670.680.680.680.680.670.660.650.66
Placebo0.620.630.630.640.640.650.640.640.630.620.63

[back to top]

Forced Expiratory Flow 25- 75% (FEF25-75) on Day 1 and Day 2

Spirometry was conducted according to internationally accepted standards post-dose at 0, 15 and 30 minutes; 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 hours on Day 1 and 23.16 and 23.75 hours on Day 2. The forced expiratory flow (FEF) 25%-75% measurement describes the amount of air expelled from the lungs during the middle half (25% - 75%) of the forced vital capacity test and is measured using spirometry. (NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 2

,,,
InterventionLiters/second (Mean)
0 minutes post-dose15 minutes post-dose30 minutes post-dose1 hour post-dose2 hours post-dose3 hours post-dose4 hours post-dose8 hours post-dose12 hours post-dose23.16 hours post-dose23.75 hours post-dose
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)1.541.821.841.891.921.991.921.791.761.781.75
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)1.551.781.801.791.901.891.941.711.631.701.77
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)1.521.811.821.951.932.011.941.831.771.681.76
Placebo1.561.541.611.591.681.681.651.591.611.511.56

[back to top]

Forced Expiratory Flow 25- 75% (FEF25-75) on Day 7 and Day 8

Spirometry was conducted according to internationally accepted standards post-dose at 0, 15 and 30 minutes; 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 hours on Day 7 and 23.16 and 23.75 hours on Day 8. The forced expiratory flow (FEF) 25%-75% measurement describes the amount of air expelled from the lungs during the middle half (25% - 75%) of the forced vital capacity test and is measured using spirometry. (NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Day 7, Day 8

,,,
InterventionLiters/second (Mean)
0 minutes post-dose15 minutes post-dose30 minutes post-dose1 hour post-dose2 hours post-dose3 hours post-dose4 hours post-dose8 hours post-dose12 hours post-dose23.16 hours post-dose23.75 hours post-dose
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)1.711.831.831.871.912.021.931.811.761.681.79
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)1.701.761.801.821.881.911.901.711.661.661.74
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)1.691.781.801.891.891.881.881.801.681.691.73
Placebo1.511.541.571.611.641.691.651.641.561.521.62

[back to top]

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Time-Point on Day 1 and Day 2

Spirometry was conducted according to internationally accepted standards post-dose at 0, 15 and 30 minutes; 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 hours on Day 1 and 23.16 and 23.75 hours on Day 2. FVC is the amount of air that can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. (NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 2

,,,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
0 minutes post-dose15 minutes post-dose30 minutes post-dose1 hour post-dose2 hours post-dose3 hours post-dose4 hours post-dose8 hours post-dose12 hours post-dose23.16 hours post-dose23.75 hours post-dose
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)4.234.344.394.384.454.444.404.354.294.314.36
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)4.114.294.294.334.394.384.394.204.164.344.41
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)4.304.524.474.494.544.524.544.514.424.444.41
Placebo4.274.254.184.304.364.334.304.214.244.214.30

[back to top]

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Time-Point on Day 7 and Day 8

Spirometry was conducted according to internationally accepted standards post-dose at 0, 15 and 30 minutes; 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 hours on Day 7 and 23.16 and 23.75 hours on Day 8. FVC is the amount of air that can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. (NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Day 7, Day 8

,,,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
0 minutes post-dose15 minutes post-dose30 minutes post-dose1 hour post-dose2 hours post-dose3 hours post-dose4 hours post-dose8 hours post-dose12 hours post-dose23.16 hours post-dose23.75 hours post-dose
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)4.354.364.374.414.424.464.444.314.254.294.34
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)4.284.344.364.374.394.374.384.244.174.324.41
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)4.304.334.364.354.404.404.394.294.234.304.34
Placebo4.224.214.214.284.374.344.324.314.214.284.36

[back to top]

Observed Maximum Concentration (Cmax) After Drug Administration

(NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 7

,,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Day 1 (n=31,30,31)Day 7 (n=33,31,31)
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)64.290.5
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)72.9112
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)124174

[back to top]

Peak FEV1 at Day 1 and Day 7

Spirometry was performed according to internationally accepted standards at 0, 15 and 30 minutes; 1,2,3,4,8,12 hours on Day 1 and 23.16 and 23.75 hours on Day 2 after 1 day of treatment and on Day 7 and Day 8 following 7 days of treatment. Peak FEV1 was the maximum FEV1 post treatment. Analysis of Covariance with treatment, period, sequence and subject nested within sequence as fixed effects and period FEV1 baseline included as a covariate. (NCT01484197)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 7

,,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Day 7 (n=33,30,32,33)
37.5 µg Indacaterol (PoS)3.053.10
75 µg Indacaterol (LB)3.083.09
75 µg Indacaterol (PoS)3.113.11
Placebo2.852.89

[back to top]

Increase in Breast Milk Production

The primary outcome is the difference in the proportion of women having a 50% increase in breast milk volume at the end of 14 days of treatment with domperidone compared to mothers receiving placebo (mean day 14 volume minus mean day 0 volume at entry). (NCT01512225)
Timeframe: Day 0 to day 14

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A: Domperidone35
Group B: Placebo + Domperidone26

[back to top]

Increase in Breast Milk Volume on Day 28

Number of mothers who achieved 50% increase in milk volume on day 28 (NCT01512225)
Timeframe: day 0 to day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A: Domperidone31
Group B: Placebo + Domperidone28

[back to top]

Mean Breast Milk Volumes on Day 14

Mean milk volumes between the two groups at 14 days of study intervention (NCT01512225)
Timeframe: Day 0 and day 14

Interventionmillilitres (Mean)
Group A: Domperidone267
Group B: Placebo + Domperidone217

[back to top]

Mean Breast Milk Volumes on Day 28

Mean milk volumes between the two groups at 28 days of study intervention (NCT01512225)
Timeframe: day 0 and 28

Interventionmillilitres (Mean)
Group A: Domperidone290
Group B: Placebo + Domperidone302

[back to top]

Mean Volume Change From Day 0 to Day 14

change on the volume of milk from day 0 to day 14 between the two groups (NCT01512225)
Timeframe: days 0 and 14

Interventionmillilitres (Mean)
Group A: Domperidone254
Group B: Placebo + Domperidone175

[back to top]

Mean Volume Change on the Volume of Milk From Day 15 to Day 28

change on the volume of milk from day 15 to day 28 between the two groups (NCT01512225)
Timeframe: day 15 and day 28

Interventionmillilitres (Mean)
Group A: Domperidone22
Group B: Placebo + Domperidone49

[back to top]

Provision of Breast Milk at 6 Weeks Post Term Gestation

Provision of breast milk at 6 weeks post term gestation as primary source of nutrition (NCT01512225)
Timeframe: 6 weeks post term gestation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A: Domperidone19
Group B: Placebo + Domperidone20

[back to top]

Provision of Breast Milk at Term Gestation

provision of breast milk as the primary source of nutrition (NCT01512225)
Timeframe: term gestation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A: Domperidone26
Group B: Placebo + Domperidone27

[back to top]

Side Effects (Hypotension, Flushing, Nausea and Emesis) Associated With Uterotonic Drug Use

Number of subjects experiencing hypotension, flushing, nausea, and emesis reported after administration of uterotonic agents. (NCT01549223)
Timeframe: Up to 15 min from time of infant delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard Care Group3
Protocol Group2

[back to top]

1. Amount of Oxytocin to Obtain Satisfactory Uterine Tone.

Will measure total amount of oxytocin to achieve satisfactory uterine tone, as determined by the operating obstetrician. (NCT01549223)
Timeframe: Up to 15 min from time of infant delivery

InterventionIU (Mean)
Standard Care Group8.4
Protocol Group4.0

[back to top]

Change in Lesion Area of Treated Telangiectasia.

Change in lesion area (compared with baseline measurement) of treated telangiectasia. (NCT01752049)
Timeframe: 84 days

Interventionmm^2 (Geometric Mean)
Topical Timolol Maleate-6
Placebo-8

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 11 AM

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Data from 4 and 8 weeks at 11 AM were pooled, and a negative change indicates an improvement. One eye (target eye) was used for the analysis. (NCT02325518)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Week 8 at 11 AM

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineMean change pooled over Week 4 and Week 8
BRI/TIM17.0-3.3
DOR/TIM17.0-3.4

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at 9 AM

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Data from 4 and 8 weeks at 9 AM were pooled, and a negative change indicates an improvement. One eye (target eye) was used for the analysis. (NCT02325518)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Week 8 at 9 AM

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange at Pool (Week 4, Week 8)
BRI/TIM17.4-3.3
DOR/TIM17.3-2.9

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

Responses determined per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by CT or MRI, where Objective Response (OR) represents either a Complete Response (CR; disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR; at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters); Objective Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT02345265)
Timeframe: Up to 32 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer22.86

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by HRR Status in Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Cancer

"PFS determined per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), where disease progression represents at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, appearance of one or more new lesions, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.~Homologous recombination repair (HRR) status was measured by the BROCA-HR assay. BROCA-HR is a targeted NGS platform including all known gynecologic cancer susceptibility genes and other DNA repair or related genes as well as a 3100 single nucleotide polymorphism panel to increase coverage for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis. HRR status was associated as a pooled group against PFS using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator with 95% confidence bands derived using Greenwood's formula." (NCT02345265)
Timeframe: Interval from start of treatment to documented disease progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 32 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
HRRmt16.79
HRRwt16.43

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the number of months between study enrollment and death from any cause. Patients still alive at the last follow-up were censored on the date of last contact. Japanese cohort not included in overall survival analysis, the cohort was only included in toxicity assessments. (NCT02446600)
Timeframe: Approximately 30 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Platinum-based Chemotherapy)31.3
Arm II (Olaparib)29.2
Arm III (Olaparib, Cediranib Maleate)30.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Frequency and Severity of Adverse Effects

Number of treated patients with Adverse Events (grade 3 or higher) observed while receiving randomized therapy, by Preferred term with incidence rate greater than 5%. (NCT02446600)
Timeframe: During treatment period and up to 100 days after stopping the study treatment, up to 39 months.

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AnemiaFatigueNeutrophil count decreasedPlatelet count decreasedUrinary tract infectionWhite blood cell decreased
Arm I (Platinum-based Chemotherapy)23351241022
Arm II (Olaparib)281232113
Arm III (Olaparib, Cediranib Maleate)113173152
Japanese Cohort101001

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival Determined Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 Criteria

Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the number of months between study enrollment and documentation of disease progression (RECIST 1.1) or death from any cause. Patients still alive and disease free at the last follow-up were censored on the date of last CT Scan, or the CT Scan date prior to two missed assessments. Japanese cohort not included in progression free survival analysis, only included in toxicity assessments. (NCT02446600)
Timeframe: The protocol required lesion assessments every 9 weeks from cycle 1, day 1 for the first year, then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression. An average of approximately 10 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Platinum-based Chemotherapy)10.3
Arm II (Olaparib)8.2
Arm III (Olaparib, Cediranib Maleate)10.4

[back to top]

Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Asenapine Maleate Patches Compared With Placebo Patches in Subjects Diagnosed With Schizophrenia as Measured Using the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale: Change From Baseline to Week 6.

"To evaluate efficacy and safety of HP-3070 compared with placebo for the treatment of schizophrenia as evaluated by the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale.~The severity of illness for each participant was rated using the CGI-S. The rater or Investigator answered the following question: Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?. Response choices included: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill, 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants." (NCT02876900)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Low Dose Asenapine Maleate Patch-1.3
High Dose Asenapine Maleate Patch-1.2
Placebo Patch-0.9

[back to top]

Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Asenapine Maleate Patches Compared With Placebo Patches in Subjects Diagnosed With Schizophrenia as Measured Using the Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 6.

"To evaluate efficacy and safety of HP-3070 compared with placebo for the treatment of schizophrenia as evaluated by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score.~The PANSS total score is the sum of all 30 items (7 positive items, 7 negative items, and 16 general psychopathology items). For each item, severity was rated on an anchored 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicating the absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicating extremely severe symptoms. If one or more items are missing at a given assessment, the total score is set to missing. Total score ranges from 30 to 210. Score indicates severity of the disease, i.e. low score = low severity." (NCT02876900)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Low Dose Asenapine Maleate Patch-22.1
High Dose Asenapine Maleate Patch-20.4
Placebo Patch-15.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Reach Partial Response, Assessed by Hemangioma Color

Assess time to partial response or greater by VAS-color, comparing baseline to day 30, day 60, day 120 and day 180. Partial response: >30% and up to 80% reduction in color of hemangioma (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: 180 days

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
30-Day Visit60-Day Visit120-Day Visit180-Day Visit
0.25% Timolol Treatment17192529
0.5% Timolol Treatment20212830
Non-Intervention Group0245

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Partial Response of Hemangioma Volume as Measured by VAS (Visual Analog Scale) Within Each Treatment Arm and Compared With Untreated Controls

The VAS-volume is a 100 mm scale used to independently grade hemangioma volume. -100 indicates hemangioma has doubled in size, 0 indicates no change, and +100 indicates complete shrinkage. Partial response is defined as >20% and up to 80% reduction in volumetric size of hemangioma. (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: 180 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
0.25% Timolol Treatment24
0.5% Timolol Treatment28
Non-Intervention Group15

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Partial Response of Hemangioma Volume as Measured by VAS (Visual Analog Scale) Within Each Treatment Arm

The VAS-volume is a 100 mm scale used to independently grade hemangioma volume. -100 indicates hemangioma has doubled in size, 0 indicates no change, and +100 indicates complete shrinkage. Partial response is defined as >20% and up to 80% reduction in volumetric size of hemangioma. (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: 180 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
0.25% Timolol Treatment24
0.5% Timolol Treatment28

[back to top]

Comparison of Partial Response of Hemangioma Color From Baseline to 180 Days, Within Each Treatment Arm

Comparison of partial response of hemangioma color (partial response or greater as assessed by VAS-color) between the two treatment arms. Partial response: >30% and up to 80% reduction in color of hemangioma. (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: 180 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
0.25% Timolol Treatment32
0.5% Timolol Treatment34

[back to top]

Change in Hemangioma Quality of Life (IH-QoL) Assessment for Infants

Absolute change in IH-QoL score scale from Day 0 to end of study within each treatment arm. The IH-QoL score scale consists of 4 domains (physical symptom of patient, social functioning of patient, social and psychological functioning of caregiver, and emotional functioning of caregiver) and 29 items, with each item scored on a Likert scale : 0 = never a problem, 1 = almost never a problem, 2 = sometimes a problem, 3 = often a problem and 4 = almost always a problem). The total range is 0-116; the higher the total number indicates a worse outcome. (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: baseline, day 180

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
0.25% Timolol Treatment35.3
0.5% Timolol Treatment37.4
Non-Intervention Group32.6

[back to top]

Change in Hemangioma Dynamic Complication Scale (HDCS)

Absolute change in hemangioma dynamic complication scale from Day 0 to end of study within each treatment arm. The HDCS provides a 6-point severity grading system for 12 individual hemangioma-related complications (grade 0 represents absent to minimal; grade 5 = most severe). The total score ranges from 0-60. (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: baseline, day 180

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
0.25% Timolol Treatment0
0.5% Timolol Treatment-0.1
Non-Intervention Group0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Partial Response in Hemangioma Color as Measured by VAS (Visual Analog Scale) Within Each Treatment Arm and Compared With Untreated Controls

The VAS-color is a 100 mm scale used to independently grade hemangioma color. -100 indicates hemangioma is twice as intense, 0 indicates no change, and +100 indicates complete resolution. Partial response is defined as >30% and up to 80% reduction in color of hemangioma. (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: 180 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
0.25% Timolol Treatment32
0.5% Timolol Treatment34
Non-Intervention Group19

[back to top]

Number of Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Events of Special Interest in Infants Treated With Topical Timolol Maleate

Serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest from randomization to Day 180 in infants treated with topical timolol maleate (0.25% and 0.5%) GFS for the treatment of infantile hemangioma. (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: up to 270 days

,
Interventionadverse events (Number)
AEs of Special InterestSerious AEs
0.25% Timolol Treatment143
0.5% Timolol Treatment142

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Reach Partial Response, Assessed by Volume

Assess time to partial response or greater by VAS-volume, comparing baseline to day 30, day 60, day 120 and day 180. Partial response: >20% and up to 80% reduction in volumetric size of hemangioma (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 180 days

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
30-Day Visit60-Day Visit120-Day Visit180-Day Visit
0.25% Timolol Treatment12171823
0.5% Timolol Treatment14192124
Non-Intervention Group0134

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Awake Objective Cough Frequency

Objective cough frequency measured by ambulatory cough monitoring device (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventioncoughs per hour (log transformed) (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg-0.185
Orvepitant 20mg-0.192
Orvepitant 30mg-0.271
Placebo-0.243

[back to top]

Change in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at Week 2 Compared to Baseline

Objective cough frequency measured by ambulatory cough monitoring device (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 2

Interventioncoughs per hour (log transformed) (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg-0.180
Orvepitant 20mg-0.181
Orvepitant 30mg-0.215
Placebo-0.139

[back to top]

Change in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at Week 4 Compared to Baseline

Objective cough frequency measured by ambulatory cough monitoring device (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventioncoughs per hour (log transformed) (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg-0.188
Orvepitant 20mg-0.231
Orvepitant 30mg-0.211
Placebo-0.169

[back to top]

Change in the Urge-to-cough Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 8 Compared to Baseline

"The urge-to-cough VAS was a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their urge to cough over the previous 24 hours (day/awake time and night time combined). The VAS ranged from no urge to cough (0 mm) on the left to severe urge to cough (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the urge to cough VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12." (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionScore (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg-23.8
Orvepitant 20mg-14.5
Orvepitant 30mg-19.7
Placebo-11.0

[back to top]

Change in the Urge-to-cough Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 4 Compared to Baseline

"The urge-to-cough VAS was a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their urge to cough over the previous 24 hours (day/awake time and night time combined). The VAS ranged from no urge to cough (0 mm) on the left to severe urge to cough (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the urge to cough VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12." (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

InterventionScore (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg-19.0
Orvepitant 20mg-12.0
Orvepitant 30mg-17.3
Placebo-8.8

[back to top]

Change in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 12 Compared to Baseline - Day-time

"The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from no cough (0 mm) on the left to worst cough (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12." (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionScore (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg-18.8
Orvepitant 20mg-11.6
Orvepitant 30mg-20.1
Placebo-10.6

[back to top]

Change in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at Week 8 Compared to Baseline

The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a 19 item questionnaire that assessed cough related quality of life. It has three domains (physical, psychological and social) and subjects were asked to complete it based on their experience in a recall period of 8 weeks. The total score range is 3 to 21 and domain scores each range from 1 to 7; a higher score indicated a better quality of life. Subjects completed the LCQ whilst in the clinic at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12. (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionTotal score (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg2.78
Orvepitant 20mg2.19
Orvepitant 30mg2.82
Placebo1.34

[back to top]

Change in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 2 Compared to Baseline - Day-time

"The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from no cough (0 mm) on the left to worst cough (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12." (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 2

InterventionScore (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg-17.7
Orvepitant 20mg-10.5
Orvepitant 30mg-13.5
Placebo-6.3

[back to top]

Change in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at Week 4 Compared to Baseline

The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a 19 item questionnaire that assessed cough related quality of life. It has three domains (physical, psychological and social) and subjects were asked to complete it based on their experience in a recall period of 4 weeks. The total score range is 3 to 21 and domain scores each range from 1 to 7; a higher score indicated a better quality of life. Subjects completed the LCQ whilst in the clinic at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12. (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

InterventionTotal score (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg2.50
Orvepitant 20mg2.15
Orvepitant 30mg2.98
Placebo1.61

[back to top]

Change in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at Week 2 Compared to Baseline

The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a 19 item questionnaire that assessed cough related quality of life. It has three domains (physical, psychological and social) and subjects were asked to complete it based on their experience in a recall period of 2 weeks. The total score range is 3 to 21 and domain scores each range from 1 to 7; a higher score indicated a better quality of life. Subjects completed the LCQ whilst in the clinic at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12. (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 2

InterventionTotal score (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg2.41
Orvepitant 20mg2.37
Orvepitant 30mg2.93
Placebo1.24

[back to top]

Change in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 2 Compared to Baseline - Night-time

"The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from no cough (0 mm) on the left to worst cough (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12." (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 2

InterventionScore (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg-12.8
Orvepitant 20mg-7.8
Orvepitant 30mg-6.2
Placebo-3.9

[back to top]

Change in the Urge-to-cough Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 12 Compared to Baseline

"The urge-to-cough VAS was a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their urge to cough over the previous 24 hours (day/awake time and night time combined). The VAS ranged from no urge to cough (0 mm) on the left to severe urge to cough (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the urge to cough VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12." (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionScore (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg-23.7
Orvepitant 20mg-12.6
Orvepitant 30mg-22.9
Placebo-11.8

[back to top]

Change in the Urge-to-cough Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 2 Compared to Baseline

"The urge-to-cough VAS was a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their urge to cough over the previous 24 hours (day/awake time and night time combined). The VAS ranged from no urge to cough (0 mm) on the left to severe urge to cough (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the urge to cough VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12." (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 2

InterventionScore (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg-20.8
Orvepitant 20mg-12.0
Orvepitant 30mg-13.8
Placebo-7.0

[back to top]

Change in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at Week 12 Compared to Baseline

The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a 19 item questionnaire that assessed cough related quality of life. It has three domains (physical, psychological and social) and subjects were asked to complete it based on their experience in a recall period of 12 weeks. The total score range is 3 to 21 and domain scores each range from 1 to 7; a higher score indicated a better quality of life. Subjects completed the LCQ whilst in the clinic at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12. (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionTotal score (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg2.38
Orvepitant 20mg2.09
Orvepitant 30mg3.23
Placebo1.50

[back to top]

Change in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 8 Compared to Baseline - Night-time

"The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from no cough (0 mm) on the left to worst cough (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12." (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionScore (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg-11.5
Orvepitant 20mg-6.8
Orvepitant 30mg-9.8
Placebo-2.2

[back to top]

Change in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 8 Compared to Baseline - Day-time

"The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from no cough (0 mm) on the left to worst cough (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12." (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionScore (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg-21.0
Orvepitant 20mg-9.9
Orvepitant 30mg-18.6
Placebo-8.2

[back to top]

Change in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 4 Compared to Baseline - Night-time

"The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from no cough (0 mm) on the left to worst cough (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12." (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

InterventionScore (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg-10.1
Orvepitant 20mg-7.9
Orvepitant 30mg-5.8
Placebo-2.7

[back to top]

Change in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 4 Compared to Baseline - Day-time

"The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from no cough (0 mm) on the left to worst cough (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12." (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

InterventionScore (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg-17.9
Orvepitant 20mg-9.4
Orvepitant 30mg-15.9
Placebo-7.8

[back to top]

Change in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 12 Compared to Baseline - Night-time

"The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from no cough (0 mm) on the left to worst cough (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12." (NCT02993822)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionScore (Mean)
Orvepitant 10mg-8.9
Orvepitant 20mg-7.1
Orvepitant 30mg-9.6
Placebo-1.5

[back to top]

Bronchodilator Effect of Indacaterol Salts Compared to Placebo Measured by FEF25-75%

The Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25%-75% measurement describes the amount of air expelled from the lungs during the middle half (25% - 75%) of the forced vital capacity test and is measured using spirometry at each post dose time point after 14 days (NCT03257995)
Timeframe: Day 14 of each of the three treatment periods at 5, 15, 30m, 1 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 23hour.15min and 23hour.45min

,,
InterventionLiters/second (Least Squares Mean)
5 min15 min30 min1 hour2 hour4 hour8 hour12 hour23 hour 15 min23 hour 45 min
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg1.69181.74581.74131.73491.80741.75031.67741.58491.62571.6580
Indacaterol Maleate 150 µg1.69681.74541.73471.77151.79071.76631.67551.65491.66671.6446
Placebo1.49621.45311.46901.49631.50881.48431.42171.38621.42141.4584

[back to top]

Trough FEV1

FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of forced exhalation. Treatment differences in trough FEV1 after 14 days of treatment between indacaterol maleate 150 μg and placebo, between indacaterol acetate 150 μg and placebo and indacaterol maleate and indacaterol acetate (NCT03257995)
Timeframe: Day 14 of each of the three treatment periods

InterventionLiters (Mean)
Indacaterol Maleate2.4173
Indacaterol Acetate2.3774
Placebo2.2191

[back to top]

Time to Peak FEV1 on Day 14

The differences in median time to peak FEV1 (h) between indacaterol maleate 150 µg and placebo (NCT03257995)
Timeframe: Day 14 of each of the three treatment periods

Interventionh (Median)
Indacaterol Maleate-0.02
Indacaterol Acetate-0.02
Placebo0.00

[back to top]

Time of Maximal Plasma Concentration (Tmax) at Steady State

Time of maximal plasma concentration of indacaterol maleate and indacaterol acetate at steady state. Time to reach the maximum concentration after administration. In this analysis Tmax will be reported using blood samples taken on Days 14 (NCT03257995)
Timeframe: Day 14 of each of the three treatment periods

Interventionh (Median)
Indacaterol Maleate 150 µg0.250
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg0.467

[back to top]

The Maximum Concentration (Cmax) at Steady State (ss)

Maximal plasma concentrations of indacaterol maleate and indacaterol acetate at steady state. The maximum concentration (Cmax) were obtained directly from the measured concentration-time curves. The concentration-time curve is the result of time points of blood sampling and its measured concentration in the blood samplings. (NCT03257995)
Timeframe: Day 14 of each of the three treatment periods

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Indacaterol Maleate 150 µg249
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg224

[back to top]

The Lowest Plasma (or Serum or Blood) Concentration (Cmin) at Steady State

The lowest plasma (or serum or blood) concentration observed during a dosing interval at steady state. Only summary statistics was provided. (NCT03257995)
Timeframe: Day 14 of each of the three treatment periods

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Indacaterol Maleate 150 µg56
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg52.3

[back to top]

Rescue Medication Usage

The mean daily number of puffs of rescue medication usage as reported by subjects via diary. (NCT03257995)
Timeframe: 14 days of treatment for each of the three treatment periods

InterventionPuffs (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol Maleate 150 µg1.01
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg1.01
Placebo1.43

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics AUC 0-24hours at Steady State

AUC 0-24hours of plasma concentrations of indacaterol maleate and indacaterol acetate at steady state.The area under the concentrations-time curve (AUC0-24) was calculated with the measured data points from the time of administration up to 24 h after administration by the trapezoidal formula. The concentration-time curve is the result of time points of blood sampling and its measured concentration in the blood samplings (NCT03257995)
Timeframe: Day 14 of each of the three treatment periods

Interventionh*pg/mL (Mean)
Indacaterol Maleate 150 µg2300
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg2050

[back to top]

Mean Overall Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)

A Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) meter was distributed to patients at Visit 1, to be used to measure PEF twice-daily as directed. During the Screening and Treatment Periods, PEF was measured in the morning and evening every day. the morning PEF was performed within 15 minutes after waking, and the evening PEF approximately 12 hours later. The highest of 3 values was recorded as the daily personal best. The personal best was used to calculate the mean morning PEF and mean evening PEF value collected between assessment Visits LS Mean of change from baseline in mean morning PEF is calculated with the ANOVA model using treatment, stratification group, dosing schedule, gender, center grouping, smoking status, and baseline mean morning PEF as covariates (NCT03257995)
Timeframe: Days 8 through Day 14 of each of the three treatment periods

InterventionLiters/min (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol Maleate 150 µg409.7
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg407.6
Placebo376.8

[back to top]

Bronchodilator Effect of Indacaterol Salts Compared to Placebo in Standardized FEV1 AUC.

Standardized FEV1 AUC from pre-dose to 4 h post-dose. Evaluated the differences in standardized FEV1 AUC0-4h (L) after 14 days of treatment between indacaterol maleate 150 μg and placebo, and between indacaterol acetate 150 μg and placebo. FEV1 was measured with spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. The standardized AUC FEV1 was calculated as the sum of trapezoids divided by the length of time over an entire day (AUC 0-4h) (NCT03257995)
Timeframe: Pre-dose to 4 hours post-dose on Day 14 of each of the three treatment periods

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol Maleate 150 µg2.5179
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg2.5151
Placebo2.2703

[back to top]

Bronchodilator Effect of Indacaterol Salts Compared to Placebo Measured by FEV1/FVC

Bronchodilator effect of indacaterol salts compared to placebo in terms of FEV1/FVC at each post dose time point after 14 days. FEV1/FVC ratio is the percentage of the total FVC that is expelled from the lungs during the first second of forced exhalation. (NCT03257995)
Timeframe: Day 14 of each of the three treatment periods at 5, 15, 30m, 1 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 23hour.15min and 23hour.45min

,,
InterventionRatio (Least Squares Mean)
5 min15 min30 min1 hour2 hour4 hour8 hour12 hour23 hour 15 min23 hour 45 min
Indacaterol Acetate0.69520.70170.69960.70070.70850.70100.69670.68850.68530.6899
Indacaterol Maleate0.69790.70020.70120.70530.70850.70570.69620.69580.68980.6934
Placebo0.67290.66720.67060.67290.67470.67320.66510.65990.65720.6633

[back to top]

Relative Bioavailability (Frel) of Indacaterol Acetate and Indacaterol Maleate

Relative bioavailability will be determined for AUC0-24h,ss and Cmax,ss comparing systemic exposure of indacaterol acetate and indacaterol maleate. (NCT03257995)
Timeframe: Day 14

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Indacaterol Maleate / Indacaterol Acetate0.912
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg0.910

[back to top]

Percent of Predicted Bronchodilator Effect of Indacaterol Salts Compared to Placebo Measured by FEV1 (% Predicted) at All Timepoints

"The FEV1 percent predicted expresses FEV1 as a percentage of the predicted values for participants of similar characteristics (height, age, sex, and sometimes race and weight). A positive change from baseline in FEV1 % predicted indicates improvement in lung function. FEV1 % predicted was assessed at each post dose time point after 14 days" (NCT03257995)
Timeframe: Day 14 of each of the three treatment periods at 5, 15, 30m, 1 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 23hour.15min and 23hour.45min

,,
InterventionPercent of predicted (Least Squares Mean)
5 min15 min30 min1 hour2 hours4 hours8 hours12 hours23 hours 15 min23 hours 45 min
Indacaterol Acetate78.278.578.978.879.879.177.575.076.177.2
Indacaterol Maleate78.278.779.479.579.678.877.576.277.977.8
Placebo71.170.270.771.472.071.870.268.671.071.4

[back to top]

Bronchodilator Effect of Indacaterol Salts Compared to Placebo Measured by FVC (% Predicted)

Forced Vital Capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. FVC was assessed by spirometry at each post dose time point after 14 days. A positive change from baseline in FVC indicates improvement in lung function. (NCT03257995)
Timeframe: Day 14 of each of the three treatment periods at 5, 15, 30m, 1 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 23hour.15min and 23hour.45min

,,
InterventionPercentage of predicted FVC (Least Squares Mean)
5 min15 min30 min1 hour2 hours4 hours8 hours12 hours23 hours 15 min23 hours 45 min
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg91.290.791.491.191.491.390.388.289.990.6
Indacaterol Maleate 150 µg90.490.891.691.190.790.590.488.591.590.6
Placebo85.384.985.185.685.986.285.48486.986.5

[back to top]

Bronchodilator Effect of Indacaterol Salts Compared to Placebo Measured by Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

Forced Vital Capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. FVC was assessed by spirometry at each post dose time point after 14 days. A positive change from baseline in FVC indicates improvement in lung function. (NCT03257995)
Timeframe: Day 14 of each of the three treatment periods at at 5, 15, 30m, 1 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 23hour.15min and 23hour.45min

,,
Interventionliter (Least Squares Mean)
5 min15 min30 min1 hour2 hour4 hour8 hour12 hour23 hour 15 min23 hour 45 min
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg3.59123.57733.60393.58863.59923.59993.56173.48123.54483.5731
Indacaterol Maleate 150 µg3.56483.58503.60683.59463.57893.56743.56703.49413.60553.5668
Placebo3.37833.36003.36643.38733.39873.40533.36803.31933.41993.4185

[back to top]

Bronchodilator Effect of Indacaterol Salts Compared to Placebo Measured by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at All Timepoints

Bronchodilator effect of indacaterol salts compared to placebo in terms of FEV1. Day 14, FEV1 was measured at 24hours post dose (NCT03257995)
Timeframe: Day 14 of each of the three treatment periods at 5, 15, 30m, 1 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 23hour.15min and 23hour.45min

,,
InterventionLiter (Least Squares Mean)
5 min15 min30 min1 hour2 hour4 hour8 hour12 hour23 hour 15 min23 hour 45 min
Indacaterol Acetate2.48132.49652.50472.50182.53382.51032.45962.38362.40222.4424
Indacaterol Maleate2.47952.50052.52042.52792.52862.50542.46682.42222.46782.4585
Placebo2.26172.22822.24752.26702.27922.27812.22722.17792.23982.2631

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced At Least One or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any following reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. (NCT03268941)
Timeframe: From Baseline to 14 days after the last dose of study drug (Up to approximately 39 days)

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAEsSAEs
Part 1: Placebo41
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 100 mg41
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 25 mg30
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 5 mg40
Part 2: Metoclopramide 10 mg10
Part 2: TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg Fasted Condition00
Part 2: TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg Fed Condition10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Gastric Emptying Breath Test (GEBT) Gastric Half-emptying Time Following Single Dose Administration of TAK-906 Maleate as Measured by the 13C Spirulina GEBT on Day 1

The GEBT is a nonradioactive, noninvasive, orally administered test for measuring the rate of solid phase gastric emptying (GE) in adults. The GEBT measures how fast solid food moves from the stomach to the small intestine during the digestive process and aids in the diagnosis of delayed stomach emptying (GP). GE half-emptying time is the time in minutes (min) for half of the ingested solids to leave the stomach. This value was measured by the 13C spirulina GEBT. (NCT03268941)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1 of Part 1

,,,
Interventionminute (min) (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Day 1
Part 1: Placebo118.74-5.71
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 100 mg122.500.71
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 25 mg121.266.74
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 5 mg130.180.12

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values

The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) values outside the range Heart Rate <50 (beats/min), PR Interval ≤120 (msec), PR Interval ≥200 (msec), QRS Duration ≥120 (msec), QT Interval ≥460 (msec) were considered markedly abnormal. (NCT03268941)
Timeframe: From Baseline to 14 days after the last dose of study drug (Up to approximately 39 days)

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Heart Rate (bpm) <50PR Interval (msec) ≤120PR Interval (msec) ≥200QRS Duration (msec) ≥120QT Interval (msec) ≥460
Part 1: Placebo10100
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 100 mg01401
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 25 mg01120
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 5 mg11201
Part 2: Metoclopramide 10 mg01400
Part 2: TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg Fasted Condition10000
Part 2: TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg Fed Condition10000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Values

Clinical Laboratory parameters included tests for chemistry, hematology and urinalysis. Markedly abnormal values during treatment period were categorized as:alanine aminotransferase (ALT)>3.0 U/L*upper limit of normal(ULN),albumin<25 g/L*lower limit of normal(LLN),alkaline phosphatase >3.0 U/L*ULN,aspartate aminotransferase >3.0 U/L*ULN,bilirubin >2 umol/L*ULN,blood urea nitrogen(BUN) >10.7 mmol/L,calcium <1.75 mmol/L, >2.88 mmol/L,chloride <75 mmol/L, >126 mmol/L,creatinine >177umol/L,gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) >3 U/L*ULN,glucose <2.8 mmol/L, >19.4 mmol/L,phosphate <0.52 mmol/L, >2.10 mmol/L,potassium<3 mmol/L, >6 mmol/L,sodium <130 mmol/L, >150 mmol/L,hematocrit (%) <0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN,hemoglobin <0.8 g/L*LLN, >1.2 g/L*ULN,leukocytes <0.5 (10^9/L)*LLN, >1.5 (10^9/L)*ULN,erythrocytes<0.8 (10^12/L)*LLN, >1.2(10^12/L)*ULN,platelets <75(10^9/L), >600(10^9/L). Participants with at least 1 markedly abnormal laboratory parameter value is reported. (NCT03268941)
Timeframe: From Baseline to 14 days after the last dose of study drug in Part 1 (Up to approximately 23 days)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hematocrit (%)<0.8 x LLNHemoglobin (g/L) <0.8 x LLNALT >3.0 U/Lx ULNAST >3.0 U/L x ULNBUN >10.7 mmol/LCalcium >2.88 mmol/LGGT >3 x ULNSodium (mmol/L) <130 mmol/L
Part 1: Placebo01001001
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 100 mg00001110
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 25 mg00110000
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 5 mg10000000

[back to top]

Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for TAK-906 in Part 1

(NCT03268941)
Timeframe: Part 1: Day 1 predose and at multiple timepoints, (Up to 8 hours) postdose and Day 7 predose and at multiple timepoints (Up to 48 hours) postdose

,,
Interventionhour (hr) (Median)
Day 1Day 7
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 100 mg1.000.98
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 25 mg1.001.00
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 5 mg1.001.00

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Vital Signs

Vital signs included body temperature, diastolic and systolic blood pressure (mmHg), and heart rate (beats per minute [bpm]). Heart rate<50 bpm and systolic blood pressure <85 mmHg were considered markedly abnormal. (NCT03268941)
Timeframe: From Baseline to 14 days after the last dose of study drug (Up to approximately 39 days)

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Heart Rate (bpm) <50Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) <85
Part 1: Placebo01
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 100 mg00
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 25 mg00
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 5 mg10
Part 2: Metoclopramide 10 mg00
Part 2: TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg Fasted Condition00
Part 2: TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg Fed Condition00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Gastric Emptying Breath Test (GEBT) Gastric Half-emptying Time as Measured by the 13C Spirulina GEBT Following Multiple Dose Administration of TAK-906 Maleate on Day 7 for Part 1

The GEBT is a nonradioactive, noninvasive, orally administered test for measuring the rate of solid phase gastric emptying (GE) in adults. The GEBT measures how fast solid food moves from the stomach to the small intestine during the digestive process and aids in the diagnosis of delayed stomach emptying (GP). GE half-emptying time is the time in minutes (min) for half of the ingested solids to leave the stomach. This value was measured by the 13C spirulina GEBT. (NCT03268941)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 7

,,,
Interventionmin (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Day 7
Part 1: Placebo118.744.55
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 100 mg122.507.72
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 25 mg121.267.80
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 5 mg130.186.21

[back to top]

AUCτ: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 to Time (T) Over the Dosing Interval for TAK-906 in Part 1

(NCT03268941)
Timeframe: Part 1: Day 1 predose and at multiple timepoints, (Up to 8 hours) postdose and Day 7 predose and at multiple timepoints (Up to 48 hours) postdose

,,
Interventionh*ng/mL (Mean)
Day 1Day 7
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 100 mg131166
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 25 mg23.026.3
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 5 mg4.675.46

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Gastric Emptying (GE) Time as Measured by the SmartPill on Day 7 for Part 1

SmartPill is an ingestible capsule that measures pressure, potential of hydrogen (pH) and temperature as it travels through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to assess GE and GI motility. SmartPill eliminates radiation exposure and is the only motility test that provides a complete transit profile of the GI tract. (NCT03268941)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 7

Interventionpercent change in GE time (Mean)
Part 1: Placebo124.62
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 5 mg61.72
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 25 mg419.27
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 100 mg71.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Prolactin Concentration on Day 1 at Tmax, Time of First Occurrence of Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) for TAK-906 Maleate for Part 1

Change in serum prolactin on Day 1 at the Tmax, time of first occurrence of maximum serum concentration (Cmax) relative to Baseline was calculated as a ratio of maximum serum prolactin concentration on Day 1 to serum prolactin concentration at Baseline. (NCT03268941)
Timeframe: Day 1 predose (Baseline), 1 hour and at multiple timepoints (Up to 8 hours) postdose

Interventionratio (Mean)
Part 1: Placebo1.54
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 5 mg12.77
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 25 mg19.92
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 100 mg20.07

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for TAK 906 in Part 1

(NCT03268941)
Timeframe: Part 1: Day 1 predose and at multiple timepoints, (Up to 8 hours) postdose and Day 7 predose and at multiple timepoints (Up to 48 hours) postdose

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 1Day 7
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 100 mg75.799.6
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 25 mg12.015.5
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 5 mg2.272.87

[back to top]

Ctrough: Observed Concentration at the End of a Dosing Interval for TAK-906 in Part 1

(NCT03268941)
Timeframe: Part 1: Predose on Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Predose on Day 2Predose on Day 3Predose on Day 4Predose on Day 5Predose on Day 6Predose on Day 7Predose on Day 8Predose on Day 9
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 100 mg0.7700.9581.171.951.011.481.161.40
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 25 mg0.2620.5030.3021.090.4120.3360.5220.280
Part 1: TAK 906 Maleate 5 mg0.01210.04230.01780.04570.04230.05960.07630.0700

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Response

Response is: CR + complete response with incomplete recovery of platelets (CRp) + complete response with incomplete recovery of counts (CRi) within 3 months. CR: Bone Marrow blasts /= 1,000, Platelets >/= 100 and no extra medullary disease.CRp: Bone Marrow blasts /= 1,000 and no extra medullary disease. CRi: Bone Marrow blasts NCT03390296)
Timeframe: within 3 months of initiation of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (Anti-OX40 Antibody PF-04518600)0
Arm B (Azacitidine, Venetoclax, GO)8
Arm C (Azacitidine, GO, Avelumab)1
Arm D (Azacitidine, Venetoclax, Avelumab)2
Arm F (GO, Glasdegib)0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Time from date of treatment start until date of death due to any cause or last Follow-up. (NCT03390296)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm A (Anti-OX40 Antibody PF-04518600)3.0
Arm B (Azacitidine, Venetoclax, GO)7.6
Arm C (Azacitidine, GO, Avelumab)5.9
Arm D (Azacitidine, Venetoclax, Avelumab)4.8
Arm F (GO, Glasdegib)1.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in ANMS GCSI-DD Composite Score at Week 12

ANMS GCSI-DD is a patient-reported outcome instrument for a symptom-based clinical trial endpoint in gastroparesis . The ANMS GCSI-DD composite score included score of nausea, early satiety, upper abdominal pain and postprandial fullness. The severity scores of these symptoms range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The daily composite score was calculated by summing the scores on the 4 symptom items (nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and upper abdominal pain) and then dividing by 4, that is the number of items within the composite score. Thus, the maximum daily composite score was (4 symptoms × maximum score 4 divided by 4) = 16/4 = 4. The ANMS GCSI-DD daily composite score ranged from 0 to 4 with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity. (NCT03544229)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo42.5
TAK-906 Maleate 5 mg39.1
TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg47.2
TAK-906 Maleate 50 mg41.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index-Daily Diary (ANMS GCSI-DD) Composite Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period

ANMS GCSI-DD is a patient-reported outcome instrument for a symptom-based clinical trial endpoint in gastroparesis. The ANMS GCSI-DD composite score included score of nausea, early satiety, upper abdominal pain, and postprandial fullness. The severity scores of these symptoms range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The daily composite score was calculated by summing the scores on the 4 symptom items (nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and upper abdominal pain) and then dividing by 4, that is the number of items within the composite score. Thus, the maximum daily composite score was (4 symptoms × maximum score 4 divided by 4) = 16/4 = 4. The ANMS GCSI-DD daily composite score ranged from 0 to 4 with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity. The negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) was used for the analysis. (NCT03544229)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.19
TAK-906 Maleate 5 mg-1.11
TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg-1.17
TAK-906 Maleate 50 mg-1.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCI-DD Bloating Severity Scale Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period

The bloating severity scale was scored from 0 to 4 (where 0 = no symptom and 4 = severe symptom). The daily total score can range from 0 to 4 with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity. The negative change from baseline indicates improvement. MMRM was used for analysis. (NCT03544229)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.15
TAK-906 Maleate 5 mg-1.09
TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg-1.26
TAK-906 Maleate 50 mg-1.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Early Satiety Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period

ANMS GCSI-DD is a patient-reported outcome instrument for a symptom-based clinical trial endpoint in gastroparesis. The ANMS GCSI-DD assesses nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and upper abdominal pain on a severity score calculated from a 5-point Likert scale. The ANMS GCSI-DD early satiety symptom score ranged from 0 to 4 with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity. The negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. MMRM was used for the analysis. (NCT03544229)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.26
TAK-906 Maleate 5 mg-1.25
TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg-1.17
TAK-906 Maleate 50 mg-1.33

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Nausea Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period

ANMS GCSI-DD is a patient-reported outcome instrument for a symptom-based clinical trial endpoint in gastroparesis. The ANMS GCSI-DD assesses nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and upper abdominal pain on a severity score calculated from a 5-point Likert scale. The ANMS GCSI-DD nausea symptom score ranged from 0 to 4 with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity. The negative change from baseline indicates improvement. MMRM was used for analysis. (NCT03544229)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.42
TAK-906 Maleate 5 mg-1.36
TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg-1.36
TAK-906 Maleate 50 mg-1.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Overall Severity of Gastroparesis Symptoms Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period

The overall severity of gastroparesis symptoms is the participant report of the overall severity rating of their symptoms as entered daily in the ANMS GCSI-DD and at time of visit. Severity was rated on a 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) scale. Higher score values indicated more severe symptoms. MMRM was used for the analysis. (NCT03544229)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.20
TAK-906 Maleate 5 mg-1.02
TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg-1.22
TAK-906 Maleate 50 mg-1.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Postprandial Fullness Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period

ANMS GCSI-DD is a patient-reported outcome instrument for a symptom-based clinical trial endpoint in gastroparesis. The ANMS GCSI-DD assesses nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and upper abdominal pain on a severity score calculated from a 5-point Likert scale. The ANMS GCSI-DD postprandial fullness symptom score ranged from 0 to 4 with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity. The negative change from baseline indicates improvement. MMRM was used for the analysis. (NCT03544229)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.32
TAK-906 Maleate 5 mg-1.26
TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg-1.27
TAK-906 Maleate 50 mg-1.35

[back to top]

Percentage of Symptomatic Weeks

Symptomatic weeks are weeks with average composite symptom score assessed as >mild [ANMS GCSI-DD score ≥2] during 12 weeks of treatment. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for the analysis. (NCT03544229)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of weeks (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo54.89
TAK-906 Maleate 5 mg46.42
TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg50.03
TAK-906 Maleate 50 mg51.31

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Recorded Vomiting Frequency at Week 12 of the Treatment Period

Vomiting frequency was collected as the number of times a participant vomited in a 24-hour period i.e., vomiting episodes using the ANMS GCSI-DD. The daily score was averaged over 7 days. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. MMRM was used for the analysis. (NCT03544229)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionvomiting episodes/day (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.71
TAK-906 Maleate 5 mg-0.44
TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg-0.48
TAK-906 Maleate 50 mg-0.63

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Total Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period

Daily total score was calculated by summing scores on each of the 5 symptom items in ANMS GCSI-DD (nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, upper abdominal pain and vomiting) plus the bloating severity item and then dividing by 6. When calculating total score, vomiting frequency was scored from 0 to 4 (where 0=no vomiting and 4=four or more episodes of vomiting). The daily total score can range from 0 to 4 with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity. MMRM was used for analyses. (NCT03544229)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.10
TAK-906 Maleate 5 mg-1.00
TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg-1.09
TAK-906 Maleate 50 mg-1.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the ANMS GCSI-DD Upper Abdominal Pain Symptom Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period

ANMS GCSI-DD is a patient-reported outcome instrument for a symptom-based clinical trial endpoint in gastroparesis. The ANMS GCSI-DD assesses nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and upper abdominal pain on a severity score calculated from a 5-point Likert scale. The ANMS GCSI-DD upper abdominal pain symptom score ranged from 0 to 4 with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity. The negative change from baseline indicates improvement. MMRM was used for the analysis. (NCT03544229)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.72
TAK-906 Maleate 5 mg-0.68
TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg-0.90
TAK-906 Maleate 50 mg-0.76

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) Total Score at Week 12 of the Treatment Period

The PAGI-SYM total score is defined as the mean of 6 PAGI-SYM subscale scores from 20 items. A 6-point Likert response scale, ranging from 0 (none) to 5 (very severe), is used to measure symptom severity in participants with upper GI disorders. The negative change from baseline indicates improvement. MMRM was used for analysis. (NCT03544229)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.33
TAK-906 Maleate 5 mg-1.25
TAK-906 Maleate 25 mg-1.51
TAK-906 Maleate 50 mg-1.57

[back to top]