Page last updated: 2024-11-09

leuprolide

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Leuprolide: A potent synthetic long-acting agonist of GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE that regulates the synthesis and release of pituitary gonadotropins, LUTEINIZING HORMONE and FOLLICLE STIMULATING HORMONE. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

leuprolide : An oligopeptide comprising pyroglutamyl, histidyl, tryptophyl, seryl, tyrosyl, D-leucyl, leucyl, arginyl, and N-ethylprolinamide residues joined in sequence. It is a synthetic nonapeptide analogue of gonadotropin-releasing hormone, and is used as a subcutaneous hydrogel implant (particularly as the acetate salt) for the treatment of prostate cancer and for the suppression of gonadal sex hormone production in children with central precocious puberty. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID657181
CHEMBL ID1201199
CHEBI ID6427
SCHEMBL ID4585
MeSH IDM0025473

Synonyms (73)

Synonym
CHEMBL1201199
leuporelin
(-)-leuprolide
tap-144 free base
ckd-841
abbott-43818 free base
leuprorelin slow release
chebi:6427 ,
gtpl1175
fensolvi (leuprolide acetate injectable suspension)
(d-leu(sup 6),des-gly-nh2(sup 10),pro-ethylamide(sup 9))-lhrh
(d-leu(sup 6),des-gly-nh2(sup 10),pro-ethylamide(sup 9))-gnrh
leuprorelina [inn-spanish]
leuprorelinum [inn-latin]
nsc 377526
hsdb 6518
leuproreline [inn-french]
nsc-377526
leuprolide
leuprorelin ,
leuprolide acetate salt, >=98% (hplc)
DB00007
bdbm50369395
leuprorelina
leuproreline
unii-efy6w0m8tg
efy6w0m8tg ,
leuprorelinum
leuprorelin [inn:ban]
ccris 8462
leuprolide acetate salt
pglu-his-trp-ser-tyr-d-leu-leu-arg-pro-nhc2h5
5-oxo-l-prolyl-l-histidyl-l-tryptophyl-l-seryl-l-tyrosyl-d-leucyl-l-leucyl-l-arginyl-n-ethyl-l-prolinamide
l-pyroglutamyl-l-histidyl-l-tryptophyl-l-seryl-l-tyrosyl-d-leucyl-l-leucyl-l-arginyl-l-proline ethylamide
pglu-his-trp-ser-tyr-d-leu-leu-arg-pro-nhet
leuprolide [hsdb]
5-oxo-l-prolyl-l-histidyl-l-tryptophyl-l-seryl-l-tryosyl-d-leucyl-l-leucyl-l-arginyl-n-ethyl-l-prolinamide
leuprorelin [ep monograph]
leuprorelin [inn]
leuprolide [mi]
leuprorelin [mart.]
leuprolide [vandf]
leuprorelin [who-dd]
AKOS015892744
GFIJNRVAKGFPGQ-LIJARHBVSA-N
SCHEMBL4585
HS-2016
CS-4947
HY-12553
mfcd00167544
AKOS030213246
leuprolide acetate, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
leuprolide acetate (usan)
leuprorelin acetate (jan)
NCGC00485984-01
(s)-n-ethyl-1-(((s)-5-oxopyrrolidine-2-carbonyl)-l-histidyl-l-tryptophyl-l-seryl-l-tyrosyl-d-leucyl-l-leucyl-l-arginyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide
DTXSID50872411 ,
Q907160
bisphenola-(3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyl)-&
CCG-270656
C75519
AKOS037515838
EN300-7481165
(2s)-1-[(2s)-5-carbamimidamido-2-[(2s)-2-[(2r)-2-[(2s)-2-[(2s)-3-hydroxy-2-[(2s)-2-[(2s)-3-(1h-imidazol-4-yl)-2-{[(2s)-5-oxopyrrolidin-2-yl]formamido}propanamido]-3-(1h-indol-3-yl)propanamido]propanamido]-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propanamido]-4-methylpentanamid
6-d-leucine-9-(n-ethyl-l-prolinamide)-1-9-luteinizing hormone-releasing factor (pig)
leuproreline (inn-french)
leuprorelin (mart.)
l02ae02
leuprorelina (inn-spanish)
dtxcid00820063
leuprorelinum (inn-latin)
leuprorelin (ep monograph)
6-d-leucine-9-(n-ethyl-l-prolinamide)-10-deglycinamide luteinizing hormone-releasing factor (pig)

Research Excerpts

Overview

Leuprolide is a synthetic nonapeptide drug (pyroGlu-His-Trp-Ser-Tyr-d-Leu- Leu-Arg-Pro-NHEt) that acts as a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. It inhibits gonadotropic hormone secretion by down-regulating pituitary GnRH receptor when administered continuously at therapeutic doses.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Leuprolide is a synthetic nonapeptide drug (pyroGlu-His-Trp-Ser-Tyr-d-Leu-Leu-Arg-Pro-NHEt) that acts as a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. "( Determination of Leuprolide-Fatty Acid Conjugate in Rat Plasma Using LC-MS/MS and Its Pharmacokinetics after Subcutaneous Administration in Rats.
Cho, JY; Jin, HE; Lee, BJ; Lee, KW; Seo, SW; Seong, GS; Yoon, IS, 2022
)
2.5
"Leuprolide acetate is a gonadotropin analogue commonly used for hormone-sensitive conditions such as prostate cancer and endometriosis."( Rationale, study design and implementation of the LUCINDA Trial: Leuprolide plus Cholinesterase Inhibition to reduce Neurologic Decline in Alzheimer's.
Atwood, CS; Bowen, RL; Butler, T; de Leon, MJ; Galvin, JE; Glodzik, L; Goldberg, JD; Hochman, T; Maloney, T; Ravdin, L, 2021
)
1.58
"Leuprolide is a safe and effective treatment of estrogen receptor-positive premenopausal breast cancer. "( Efficacy of Different Leuprolide Administration Schedules in Premenopausal Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Review.
Kendzierski, DC; Kiel, PJ; Schneider, BP, 2018
)
2.24
"Leuprolide is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, which inhibits gonadotropin secretion by down-regulating pituitary GnRH receptor when administered continuously at therapeutic doses. "( A semi-mechanistic integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of the testosterone effects of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist leuprolide in prostate cancer patients.
Lim, CN; Salem, AH, 2015
)
2.06
"Leuprolide is a synthetic nonapeptide that has two basic amino acids, arginine and histidine, in its structure. "( Rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of leuprolide in human serum.
Chen, X; Zhan, Y; Zhao, X; Zhong, D, 2009
)
2.01
"Leuprolide (Lupron) is a synthetic analog of naturally occurring gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). "( Hypersensitivity vasculitis associated with leuprolide (Lupron).
Gnanaraj, J; Saif, MW, 2010
)
2.06
"Leuprolide is a synthetic nonapeptide agonist to the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) receptor with principal clinical applications for prostate cancer."( Leuprolide acetate: pharmaceutical use and delivery potentials.
Montanari, S; Ponchel, G; Teutonico, D, 2012
)
2.54
"Leuprolide acetate (LA) is a synthetic analog of gonadotropin releasing hormone. "( Phase-sensitive polymer-based controlled delivery systems of leuprolide acetate: in vitro release, biocompatibility, and in vivo absorption in rabbits.
Singh, J; Singh, S, 2007
)
2.02
"Leuprolide acetate is a synthetic nonapeptide that is a potent gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRHR) agonist used for diverse clinical applications, including the treatment of prostate cancer, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, central precocious puberty and in vitro fertilization techniques. "( Leuprolide acetate: a drug of diverse clinical applications.
Atwood, CS; Bowen, RL; Meethal, SV; Wilson, AC, 2007
)
3.23
"Leuprolide is a new, potent analogue of gonadotropin releasing hormone, which lowers serum gonadotropins and testosterone with chronic administration. "( Androgen suppression by a gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue in patients with metastatic carcinoma of the prostate.
Smith, JA, 1984
)
1.71
"Leuprolide is a potent gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue used to suppress leuteotrophic hormone (LH) and testosterone levels in patients with metastatic prostate cancer."( Pituitary apoplexy after leuprolide administration for carcinoma of the prostate.
Jamal, S; Morsi, A; Silverberg, JD, 1996
)
1.32
"Leuprolide is a potent luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist used for the treatment of hormone-dependent diseases. "( Sublingual absorption of leuprolide: comparison between human and animal models.
Johnson, HW; Lu, MY; Qiu, Y; Reiland, TL, 1999
)
2.05
"Leuprolide is a synthetic structural analogue of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone used for the treatment of a large number of diseases related with the regulation of sexual hormones. "( Separation and characterization of multicomponent peptide mixtures by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Application to crude products of the synthesis of leuprolide.
Barbosa, J; Benavente, F; Sanz-Nebot, V, 2000
)
1.94
"Leuprolide is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist which produces a profound suppression of testosterone le"( Spermatogenesis by Sisyphus: proliferating stem germ cells fail to repopulate the testis after 'irreversible' injury.
Boekelheide, K; Schoenfeld, HA, 2001
)
1.03
"Leuprolide acetate is a highly potent analog of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. "( One-month release injectable microcapsules of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (leuprolide acetate) for treating experimental endometriosis in rats.
Heya, T; Ogawa, Y; Okada, H; Shimamoto, T, 1988
)
1.94
"Leuprolide is a new, potent analogue of gonadotropin-releasing hormone which, after an initial transient stimulation, causes a profound suppression of serum gonadotropins and testosterone. "( Clinical effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue in metastatic carcinoma of prostate.
Anbar, D; Glass, AG; Glode, LM; Jagst, CL; Max, DT; Murphy, GP; Smith, JA; Stein, BS; Wettlaufer, JN, 1985
)
1.71

Effects

Leuprolide acetate has been used to decrease uterine size and shrink leiomyomata. It is currently also being evaluated in phase II clinical trials for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Leuprolide has been widely used in androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, but its use is still limited due to its short half-life. "( Hydrogen-Bonded Films for Zero-Order Release of Leuprolide.
Fu, M; Guan, Y; Meng, Q; Zhang, T; Zhang, Y; Zhuang, X, 2020
)
2.26
"Leuprolide acetate (LA) has been accepted as treatment for prostatic cancer and is currently also being evaluated in phase II clinical trials for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. "( Zinc-leuprolide complex: preparation, physicochemical characterization and release behaviour from in situ forming implant.
Astaneh, R; Erfan, M; Nafissi-Varcheh, N, 2007
)
2.3
"Leuprolide acetate has been used to decrease uterine size and shrink leiomyomata. "( Aborted leiomyosarcoma after treatment with leuprolide acetate.
Mesia, AF; Mittal, K; Williams, FS; Yan, Z, 1998
)
2
"Leuprolide has been used in the treatment of prostate cancer since the 1980s."( An in vivo/in vitro comparison with a leuprolide osmotic implant for the treatment of prostate cancer.
Beck, JC; Chen, G; Jao, RM; Johnson, PA; Leonard, J; Skowronski, RJ; Stevenson, CL; Tao Leonard, S; Wright, JC, 2001
)
1.3
"Leuprolide acetate (LA) has improved the efficiency of human menopausal gonadotropins (hMG) in in vitro fertilization cycles. "( Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist improves the efficiency of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation/intrauterine insemination.
Emmi, AM; Gagliardi, CL; Schmidt, CL; Weiss, G, 1991
)
1.72
"Leuprolide has been found effective in the palliative treatment of advanced cases of prostatic cancer and is not associated with the cardiovascular and thromboembolic toxicity seen with conventional diethylstilbestrol therapy."( Leuprolide: a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog for the palliative treatment of prostatic cancer.
Bess, DT; Carter, CA; Falbe, WJ; Mickle, TR; Skoutakis, VA; Wojciechowski, NJ, 1986
)
2.44

Treatment

Leuprolide acetate-treated endometriotic tissue showed downregulated genes associated with the biological functions of steroid hormone regulation, cell proliferation, inflammation, and intracellular signaling. Leuprolides did not improve glucose intolerance, insulin level, insulin sensitivity indices, sex hormone levels, lipid profile, and estrus cycle.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The leuprolide acetate treatment simultaneously with cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-based chemotherapy reduced the risk of developing premature menopause in premenopausal patients with breast cancer."( Effect of leuprolide acetate on ovarian function after cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with breast cancer: results from a phase II randomized trial.
Gao, H; Song, G; Yuan, Z, 2013
)
1.27
"Leuprolide acetate-treated endometriotic tissue showed downregulated genes associated with the biological functions of steroid hormone regulation, cell proliferation, inflammation, and intracellular signaling. "( Differential mRNA expression profiling in ovarian endometriotic tissue with versus without leuprolide acetate treatment.
Aoki, D; Asada, M; Banno, K; Kiba, A; Nakayama, Y; Watanabe, T; Yanokura, M, 2015
)
2.08
"Leuprolide-alone treated patients had a mean decline of -1.66 g/dL (p<0.0001)."( Anaemia following initiation of androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic prostate cancer: a retrospective chart review.
Adam, TJ; Chen, SC; Curtis, KK; Gornet, MK; Pruthi, RK, 2008
)
1.07
"Leuprolide treatment for 6 hours resulted in an increase in expression of GnRHR1 (4.02 ± 0.12-fold), COL1A1 (6.41 ± 0.29-fold), fibronectin (9.69 ± 0.18-fold), and versican variant V0 (7.58 ± 0.43-fold)."( Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist leuprolide acetate and GnRH antagonist cetrorelix acetate directly inhibit leiomyoma extracellular matrix production.
Britten, JL; Catherino, WH; Levy, G; Malik, M; Mendoza, M, 2012
)
1.36
"Leuprolide acetate treatment resulted in a 3.5-fold (p < 0.0001) and a 1.5-fold (p < 0.024) reduction in total brain Abeta1-42 and Abeta1-40 concentrations, respectively, after 8 weeks of treatment."( Luteinizing hormone, a reproductive regulator that modulates the processing of amyloid-beta precursor protein and amyloid-beta deposition.
Atwood, CS; Bowen, RL; Liu, T; Martins, RN; Parlow, AF; Perry, G; Smith, MA; Verdile, G, 2004
)
1.04
"Leuprolide treatment reduced both behavioral and physical symptoms and was well tolerated in the absence of severe premenstrual depression. "( Efficacy of depot leuprolide in premenstrual syndrome: effect of symptom severity and type in a controlled trial.
Andersen, RN; Arheart, KL; Brown, CS; Farmer, RG; Ling, FW, 1994
)
2.07
"Leuprolide and tamoxifen treatments began two weeks prior to DMBA and ended one week after DMBA administration."( Prevention of DMBA-induced rat mammary carcinomas comparing leuprolide, oophorectomy, and tamoxifen.
Brackett, DJ; Hanas, JS; Hollingsworth, AB; Lerner, MR; Lightfoot, SA; McCay, PB; Wilkerson, KB, 1998
)
1.26
"Leuprolide treatment resulted in significant reductions in plasma estradiol, 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone, androstenedione, and dehydroepiandrosterone concentrations and eliminated or reduced clinical signs associated with adrenocortical disease. "( Leuprolide acetate treatment of adrenocortical disease in ferrets.
Bailey, EM; Oliver, JW; Schneider, JF; Wagner, RA, 2001
)
3.2
"In leuprolide-treated castrated rats, urinary fractional excretion of sodium (FENa) increased, indicating suppressed renal function at the proximal tubules."( Downward regulation of plasma LH by LHRH agonist, leuprolide acetate, resulting in inhibited renal growth and function in the castrated male rat.
Demura, H; Horiba, N; Nomura, K; Sato, Y; Toraya, S; Ujihara, M; Watanabe, M, 1991
)
1.05
"Leuprolide acetate treated patients demonstrated a reduction in mean uterine volume of 34% and a decrease in serum estradiol (E2) concentrations from 120 +/- 21 pg/mL (mean +/- standard error) to 16 +/- 9 pg/mL."( Fasting serum growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I and -II concentrations in women with leiomyomata uteri treated with leuprolide acetate or placebo.
Barbieri, RL; Friedman, AJ; Pandian, MR; Rein, MS, 1990
)
1.21
"Treatment with leuprolide and cetrorelix did not improve glucose intolerance, insulin level, insulin sensitivity indices, sex hormone levels, lipid profile, and estrus cycle."( Evaluation of ovarian and metabolic effects of GnRH modulators in two rat models of polycystic ovary syndrome.
Patel, R; Shah, G, 2018
)
0.82
"Treatment with leuprolide acetate, or high-dose or low-dose Dox caused significant decreases in the implant areas compared with the controls (P = 0.03, P = 0.006, and P = 0.001, respectively). "( Doxycycline causes regression of endometriotic implants: a rat model.
Akkaya, P; Bayraktar, N; Haberal, N; Mülayim, B; Onalan, G; Zeyneloglu, HB, 2009
)
0.71
"Treatment with leuprolide decreased the surface area of the endometriotic implant compared to the SC group and the C group. "( Effect of the bone marrow derived-mononuclear stem cells transplantation in the growth, VEGF-R and TNF-alpha expression of endometrial implants in Wistar rats.
Dal Lago, EA; de Azevedo, ML; de Noronha, L; do Amaral, VF; Ferreira, CC; Francisco, JC; Guarita-Souza, LC; Kondo, W; Maestrelli, P; Martins, AP; Olandoski, M; Simeoni, RB, 2011
)
0.72
"Treatment with leuprolide acetate decreased pulmonary infiltrates and improved lung function and exercise tolerance."( Favorable response to antigonadal therapy for a benign metastasizing leiomyoma.
Alford, CE; Kotz, HL; Levens, ED; Moss, J; Taveira-DaSilva, AM, 2012
)
0.72
"Treatment with leuprolide acetate 3-month depot formulations (11.25 and 30 mg) effectively suppressed the GnRH axis, was well tolerated, and may positively impact patient convenience and compliance."( Efficacy and safety of leuprolide acetate 3-month depot 11.25 milligrams or 30 milligrams for the treatment of central precocious puberty.
Bloch, CA; Chwalisz, K; Klein, K; Larsen, L; Lee, PA; Mattia-Goldberg, C; Mauras, N; Neely, EK, 2012
)
1.04
"Treatment with leuprolide or placebo had no effect on urethral closure pressure regardless of the response to treatment."( Effect of a long acting GnRH analogue or placebo on plasma LH/FSH, urethral pressure profiles and clinical signs of urinary incontinence due to Sphincter mechanism incompetence in bitches.
Arnold, S; Jöchle, W; Piché, CA; Reichler, IM; Roos, M, 2006
)
0.67
"Pretreatment with leuprolide acetate (long protocol) was followed by gonadotrophin treatment in all patients."( Pure and highly purified follicle-stimulating hormone alone or in combination with human menopausal gonadotrophin for ovarian stimulation after pituitary suppression in in-vitro fertilization.
Balasch, J; Carmona, F; Creus, M; Fábregues, F; Moreno, V; Peñarrubia, J; Puerto, B; Vanrell, JA, 1996
)
0.62
"No treatment with leuprolide surpassed the effect caused by castration."( Effect of leuprolide on growth of rat prostatic tumor (R 3327) and weight of male accessory sex organs.
Akimoto, S; Ichikawa, T; Shimazaki, J, 1988
)
1

Toxicity

The case highlights the potential side effect of lipodystrophy secondary to leuprolide acetate injections. The study was terminated prematurely because of the smaller than planned number of participants and events. No difference in major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year between patients assigned to degarelix or le uprolide was observed.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"We examined the protective effects of medical castration by means of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHA) on the toxic effects of cisplatin in rats."( Leuprolide acetate prevents toxic effects of cisplatin on the kidneys and gastrointestinal tract.
Ando, T; Demura, H; Nomura, K, 1995
)
1.73
" Safety outcomes included adverse effects, clinical laboratory changes, and bone mineral density changes."( Depot leuprolide acetate versus danazol in the treatment of women with symptomatic endometriosis: a multicenter, double-blind randomized clinical trial. II. Assessment of safety. The Lupron Endometriosis Study Group.
Knittle, JD; Miller, JD; Wheeler, JM, 1993
)
0.77
"Although side effects were commonly reported in both groups, the drugs were similarly safe in terms of the absence of serious complications and the results of cessation of therapy."( Depot leuprolide acetate versus danazol in the treatment of women with symptomatic endometriosis: a multicenter, double-blind randomized clinical trial. II. Assessment of safety. The Lupron Endometriosis Study Group.
Knittle, JD; Miller, JD; Wheeler, JM, 1993
)
0.77
" All women experienced adverse effects during GnRH-a treatment."( Adverse effects of leuprolide acetate depot treatment.
Friedman, AJ; Juneau-Norcross, M; Rein, MS, 1993
)
0.61
"Our goal was to determine if the addition of norethindrone acetate (NETA) to leuprolide acetate (LA) has an adverse effect on controlled ovarian stimulation (COH) during in vitro fertilization (IVF)."( The addition of norethindrone acetate to leuprolide acetate for ovarian suppression has no adverse effect on ovarian stimulation.
Ditkoff, EC; Lindheim, S; Prosser, R; Sauer, MV; Zimmermann, RC, 1997
)
0.79
"No adverse effect on ovarian stimulation was evident on the addition of NETA to LA."( The addition of norethindrone acetate to leuprolide acetate for ovarian suppression has no adverse effect on ovarian stimulation.
Ditkoff, EC; Lindheim, S; Prosser, R; Sauer, MV; Zimmermann, RC, 1997
)
0.56
" Serious adverse events during the study period in 15 patients were not attributable to treatment."( Safety and efficacy of an implantable leuprolide delivery system in patients with advanced prostate cancer.
Andriole, GL; Fowler, JE; Gottesman, JE; Reid, CF; Soloway, MS, 2000
)
0.58
" Ipriflavone efficaciously alleviated the adverse effects of estrogen deficiency such as bone loss and increase in LDL-C level, and the ability of leuprolide therapy to reduce myoma volume was not decreased by ipriflavone administration."( Efficacy of ipriflavone in preventing adverse effects of leuprolide.
Aso, T; Chiguchi, M; Ishibashi, T; Somekawa, Y; Wakana, K, 2001
)
0.76
"Mean number of oocytes retrieved; patients with ET, chemical, clinical and continuing pregnancies; mean peak serum E2 levels; adverse events and injection site pain scores."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of a highly purified human follicle-stimulating hormone (Bravelle) and recombinant follitropin-beta for in vitro fertilization: a prospective, randomized study.
Dickey, RP; Fein, SH; Marshall, DC; Nardi, RV; Nichols, J; Thornton, M, 2002
)
0.31
" There were no significant differences among the treatment groups in the number, nature, or intensity of adverse events."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of a highly purified human follicle-stimulating hormone (Bravelle) and recombinant follitropin-beta for in vitro fertilization: a prospective, randomized study.
Dickey, RP; Fein, SH; Marshall, DC; Nardi, RV; Nichols, J; Thornton, M, 2002
)
0.31
" All treatment withdrawals (16%, eight out of 50) were due to lack of compliance, and none to drug-related adverse experiences."( Long-term effectiveness and safety of GnRH agonist plus raloxifene administration in women with uterine leiomyomas.
Cascella, T; Doldo, P; Falbo, A; Lombardi, G; Mastrantonio, P; Nappi, C; Orio, F; Palomba, S; Russo, T; Zullo, F, 2004
)
0.32
"GnRH agonist plus raloxifene administration is an effective and safe treatment for pre-menopausal women with uterine leiomyomas."( Long-term effectiveness and safety of GnRH agonist plus raloxifene administration in women with uterine leiomyomas.
Cascella, T; Doldo, P; Falbo, A; Lombardi, G; Mastrantonio, P; Nappi, C; Orio, F; Palomba, S; Russo, T; Zullo, F, 2004
)
0.32
" The main outcome measures were the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved; secondary efficacy end-points; adverse events (AE) and other safety measures."( Comparative efficacy and safety of cetrorelix with or without mid-cycle recombinant LH and leuprolide acetate for inhibition of premature LH surges in assisted reproduction.
Frishman, GN; Sauer, MV; Schoolcraft, W; Thornton, MH, 2004
)
0.54
"LRP appears to be a safe and efficacious procedure in patients who have received NHT."( Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy: an apparently safe and effective procedure.
Brown, JA; Garlitz, C; Gomella, L; Hubosky, SG; Strup, SE, 2004
)
0.32
" The rates of adverse event occurred in 71% of patients in both groups."( [Clinical trial on the effectiveness and safety of triptorelin in treatment of uterine leiomyoma].
Hu, LN; Yang, DZ; Zheng, SR; Zhou, YF, 2005
)
0.33
"Treatment of uterine leiomyoma with triptorelin for 3 months is both effective and safe in Chinese women."( [Clinical trial on the effectiveness and safety of triptorelin in treatment of uterine leiomyoma].
Hu, LN; Yang, DZ; Zheng, SR; Zhou, YF, 2005
)
0.33
" Results showed that the incidence of adverse events was similar with the different depot formulations, with hot flushes being the most common."( Safety and clinical efficacy of a new 6-month depot formulation of leuprorelin acetate in patients with prostate cancer in Europe.
Tunn, UW; Wiedey, K, 2009
)
0.35
" The hormonal side-effect profiles of the three treatment groups were similar to previously reported effects for androgen-deprivation therapy."( The efficacy and safety of degarelix: a 12-month, comparative, randomized, open-label, parallel-group phase III study in patients with prostate cancer.
Andreou, C; Boccon-Gibod, L; Cantor, P; Jensen, JK; Klotz, L; Olesen, TK; Persson, BE; Schröder, FH; Shore, ND, 2008
)
0.35
"Adenomyosis had no adverse effects on IVF/ICSI outcomes in infertile women with proven endometriosis who were pretreated with long-term GnRH-agonist."( Adenomyosis has no adverse effects on IVF/ICSI outcomes in women with endometriosis treated with long-term pituitary down-regulation before IVF/ICSI.
Florijn, E; Halim, N; Hompes, P; Mijatovic, V; Schats, R, 2010
)
0.36
" The primary end point was the proportion of successful patients over the total number of evaluable patients (ie, patients with evaluable testosterone concentrations at all monthly assessments and no missing values due to treatment-related adverse events)."( Effectiveness, pharmacokinetics, and safety of a new sustained-release leuprolide acetate 3.75-mg depot formulation for testosterone suppression in patients with prostate cancer: a Phase III, open-label, international multicenter study.
Germa, JR; Kaisary, AV; Karlin, GS; Leuratti, C; Marberger, M; Mis, R; Savulsky, C; Shore, ND, 2010
)
0.59
" The most common treatment-related adverse event was hot flashes (45."( Effectiveness, pharmacokinetics, and safety of a new sustained-release leuprolide acetate 3.75-mg depot formulation for testosterone suppression in patients with prostate cancer: a Phase III, open-label, international multicenter study.
Germa, JR; Kaisary, AV; Karlin, GS; Leuratti, C; Marberger, M; Mis, R; Savulsky, C; Shore, ND, 2010
)
0.59
" There were no significant differences in the number of drug-related adverse events between groups (57 of 100 in the leuprorelin group and 54 of 99 in the placebo group; p=0."( Efficacy and safety of leuprorelin in patients with spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (JASMITT study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Aoki, M; Banno, H; Fujimoto, Y; Hasegawa, K; Ishikawa, K; Ito, S; Kanai, K; Kanda, F; Katsuno, M; Kawashima, M; Miyajima, H; Mizusawa, H; Morita, M; Nakano, I; Nakashima, K; Nishizawa, M; Sasaki, H; Shimohata, T; Sobue, G; Suzuki, K; Takeuchi, Y; Tanaka, F; Tsuji, S; Tsujino, A; Uchino, M; Watanabe, Y; Yabe, I; Yamamoto, T; Yamashita, T, 2010
)
0.36
" Outcomes considered in these analyses included the QT interval by central reading and analysis, and cardiovascular adverse events."( Cardiovascular safety of degarelix: results from a 12-month, comparative, randomized, open label, parallel group phase III trial in patients with prostate cancer.
Klotz, L; Olesen, TK; Persson, BE; Smith, MR; Wilde, AA, 2010
)
0.36
" Safety and tolerability assessments included adverse events (AEs), physical examinations, electrocardiograms and clinically significant changes in laboratory safety parameters."( Efficacy and safety of androgen deprivation therapy after switching from monthly leuprolide to monthly degarelix in patients with prostate cancer.
Davis, R; de la Rosette, J; Frankel, D; Kold Olesen, T, 2011
)
0.6
" The latter was shown to lower and maintain safe and effective serum testosterone suppression in a clinical study."( A 6-month depot formulation of leuprolide acetate is safe and effective in daily clinical practice: a non-interventional prospective study in 1273 patients.
Tunn, UW, 2011
)
0.66
" Adverse events occurred in 9% of patients; the majority were not serious."( A 6-month depot formulation of leuprolide acetate is safe and effective in daily clinical practice: a non-interventional prospective study in 1273 patients.
Tunn, UW, 2011
)
0.66
" Adverse events (AEs) and hormonal and safety laboratory values were monitored."( Efficacy and safety of leuprolide acetate 6-month depot for suppression of testosterone in patients with prostate cancer.
Chwalisz, K; Donnelly, J; Larsen, L; Mattia-Goldberg, C; Spitz, A; Young, JM, 2012
)
0.69
" Basal sex steroid suppression, growth rates, pubertal progression, bone age advancement, and adverse events were similar with either dose."( Efficacy and safety of leuprolide acetate 3-month depot 11.25 milligrams or 30 milligrams for the treatment of central precocious puberty.
Bloch, CA; Chwalisz, K; Klein, K; Larsen, L; Lee, PA; Mattia-Goldberg, C; Mauras, N; Neely, EK, 2012
)
0.69
" Serum testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and adverse events were recorded at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24."( Comparison of efficacy and safety of 1- and 3-month luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist depots as initial therapies for prostate cancer.
Inoue, Y; Ishizuka, O; Kiyokawa, H; Kobayashi, S; Mizusawa, H; Nakagawa, T; Nishizawa, O; Nishizawa, S; Satoh, T; Wajiki, M, 2013
)
0.39
" Three patients in the Direct Group experienced adverse events that were attributed to the co-administered bicalutamide."( Comparison of efficacy and safety of 1- and 3-month luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist depots as initial therapies for prostate cancer.
Inoue, Y; Ishizuka, O; Kiyokawa, H; Kobayashi, S; Mizusawa, H; Nakagawa, T; Nishizawa, O; Nishizawa, S; Satoh, T; Wajiki, M, 2013
)
0.39
" Patients must be monitored for adverse events associated with bicalutamide."( Comparison of efficacy and safety of 1- and 3-month luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist depots as initial therapies for prostate cancer.
Inoue, Y; Ishizuka, O; Kiyokawa, H; Kobayashi, S; Mizusawa, H; Nakagawa, T; Nishizawa, O; Nishizawa, S; Satoh, T; Wajiki, M, 2013
)
0.39
"It was safe and efficacy that GnRH-a combined with laparoscopic conservative surgery were used in treatment of endometriosis."( [Efficacy and safety of GnRH-a combine with laparoscope conservative surgery in the treatment of the moderate or severe endometriosis].
Cheng, J; Lü, QY; Zeng, KK; Zhang, W; Zhang, WT; Zhong, YJ, 2013
)
0.39
" The efficacy, pregnancy rate and adverse reactions were compared among the three groups."( [Clinical study on the effectiveness and safety of combined laparoscopy and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in the treatment of endometriosis].
Li, B; Lu, H; Song, JH; Zhang, J, 2013
)
0.39
" (4) Adverse drug reaction:rates of a adverse reactions were 21% (15/70) in Leuprolide acetate group and 20% (13/66) in Goserelin acetate group, including irregular vaginal bleeding associated with low estrogen level."( [Clinical study on the effectiveness and safety of combined laparoscopy and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in the treatment of endometriosis].
Li, B; Lu, H; Song, JH; Zhang, J, 2013
)
0.62
"Compared with laparoscopy alone, laparoscopy combined with GnRH-a is more effective in treatment of, which exhibit lower recurrence rate, higher pregnancy rate and fewer adverse reactions."( [Clinical study on the effectiveness and safety of combined laparoscopy and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in the treatment of endometriosis].
Li, B; Lu, H; Song, JH; Zhang, J, 2013
)
0.39
" IVF/ICSI in patients with severe endometriosis is safe with low complication and recurrence rates."( Efficacy and safety of IVF/ICSI in patients with severe endometriosis after long-term pituitary down-regulation.
Heymans, MW; Hompes, PG; Lambalk, CB; Leemhuis, E; Mijatovic, V; Schats, R; van der Houwen, LE, 2014
)
0.4
"gov identifier: NCT01161563) assessed patients'and clinicians'perceptions of injection site tolerability and adverse events following the intramuscular injection of triptorelin pamoate or subcutaneous injection of leuprolide acetate in 107 male, patients with advanced prostate cancer."( Comparison of tolerability and adverse events following treatment with two GnRH agonists in patients with advanced prostate cancer.
Olsen, S; Perzin, A; Schimke, L; Shore, ND; Sieber, P,
)
0.32
" Twenty adverse events (AEs) in 15 of 42 patients (35."( Is high-dose leuprorelin acetate effective and safe in asian men with prostate cancer? An open-label, non-comparative, multi-center clinical trial.
Chung, BH; Hong, SJ; Kang, TW; Kim, CS; Kim, SW; Lee, ES; Lee, HM; Lee, SH, 2014
)
0.4
"5 mg was shown to be effective and safe in Asian patients with prostate cancer, even though sexual function decreased."( Is high-dose leuprorelin acetate effective and safe in asian men with prostate cancer? An open-label, non-comparative, multi-center clinical trial.
Chung, BH; Hong, SJ; Kang, TW; Kim, CS; Kim, SW; Lee, ES; Lee, HM; Lee, SH, 2014
)
0.4
"Recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) is effective and safe for controlled ovarian stimulation."( Comparison of pharmacokinetic and safety profiles between Bemfola(®) and Gonal-f(®) after subcutaneous application.
Gouya, G; Hemetsberger, T; Irps, C; Rettenbacher, M; Sator, M; Vcelar, B; Wolzt, M, 2016
)
0.43
"Addition of abiraterone to LHRHa with radiation is safe and achieves effective prostatic androgen suppression."( External beam radiation therapy and abiraterone in men with localized prostate cancer: safety and effect on tissue androgens.
Cho, E; Dalkin, BL; Konodi, MA; Kurland, BF; Liao, JJ; Marck, BT; Matsumoto, AM; Montgomery, RB; Mostaghel, EA; Russell, KJ, 2015
)
0.42
"6, the improvements of secondary sexual characteristics, gonadal development and sex hormone levels, the change of growth rate of bone age (BA) and growth velocity, and drug adverse effects between two groups were compared."( Efficacy and safety of domestic leuprorelin in girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty: a multicenter, randomized, parallel, controlled trial.
Cao, BY; Gong, CX; Gu, Y; Guo, MJ; Li, FT; Li, T; Li, WJ; Liang, JP; Liang, XJ; Liu, M; Luo, XP; Song, WH; Su, C; Wang, R; Wu, D; Xing, J, 2015
)
0.42
"Domestic leuprorelin is effective and safe in the treatment of Chinese girls with ICPP."( Efficacy and safety of domestic leuprorelin in girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty: a multicenter, randomized, parallel, controlled trial.
Cao, BY; Gong, CX; Gu, Y; Guo, MJ; Li, FT; Li, T; Li, WJ; Liang, JP; Liang, XJ; Liu, M; Luo, XP; Song, WH; Su, C; Wang, R; Wu, D; Xing, J, 2015
)
0.42
" After treatment, the ovarian mass volumes measured with type-B ultrasound, the scores of the patient's subjective symptoms during non-menstrual and menstruation days, the pelvic signs during non-menstrual days, the changes of hormones [estradiol (E2), FSH, LH], and adverse events were observed."( [Randomized, blind, parallel-controlled and multiple-centre clinical trial on the effectiveness and safety of leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis].
Bian, M; Chen, Q; Deng, W; Huang, S; Jin, Y; Liang, Z; Liu, M; Song, J; Wang, Q; Yang, Y; Zhang, Y; Zhu, H, 2015
)
0.63
" There was no serious adverse event occurred in both two groups."( [Randomized, blind, parallel-controlled and multiple-centre clinical trial on the effectiveness and safety of leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis].
Bian, M; Chen, Q; Deng, W; Huang, S; Jin, Y; Liang, Z; Liu, M; Song, J; Wang, Q; Yang, Y; Zhang, Y; Zhu, H, 2015
)
0.63
"Leuprolide acetate is effective and safe in the treatment of endometriosis."( [Randomized, blind, parallel-controlled and multiple-centre clinical trial on the effectiveness and safety of leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis].
Bian, M; Chen, Q; Deng, W; Huang, S; Jin, Y; Liang, Z; Liu, M; Song, J; Wang, Q; Yang, Y; Zhang, Y; Zhu, H, 2015
)
2.07
" Adverse events occurred in 92."( Efficacy and safety of leuprorelin acetate 6-month depot in prostate cancer patients: a Phase III, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, comparative study in Japan.
Akaza, H; Fujimoto, T; Kudou, K; Namiki, M; Suzuki, K; Takabayashi, N, 2015
)
0.42
" No major adverse effects were registered in either group."( Cyproterone acetate vs leuprolide acetate in combination with transdermal oestradiol in transwomen: a comparison of safety and effectiveness.
Battista, G; Cerpolini, S; Gava, G; Martelli, V; Meriggiola, MC; Seracchioli, R, 2016
)
0.74
" This case highlights the potential side effect of lipodystrophy secondary to leuprolide acetate injections."( Unusual side effect from a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist, leuprorelin, in the treatment of prostate cancer: a case report.
Bucci, J; Chang, JI, 2016
)
0.66
"8 ng/mL, clinical stage T2bN0M0, Gleason 4+5=9 prostate cancer who developed an unusual side effect from leuprolide acetate as part of his androgen deprivation therapy."( Unusual side effect from a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist, leuprorelin, in the treatment of prostate cancer: a case report.
Bucci, J; Chang, JI, 2016
)
0.65
" The implication of this potential side effect poses difficult management strategies for such patients, and second-line alternatives such as chemotherapy may need to be considered."( Unusual side effect from a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist, leuprorelin, in the treatment of prostate cancer: a case report.
Bucci, J; Chang, JI, 2016
)
0.43
" The incidence of bone-related adverse events was around 5% in both groups."( A follow-up study of a randomized controlled study evaluating safety and efficacy of leuprorelin acetate every-3-month depot for 2 versus 3 or more years with tamoxifen for 5 years as adjuvant treatment in premenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive
Fujii, T; Kurebayashi, J; Matsumoto, H; Nomizu, T; Ohashi, Y; Ohtake, T; Okazaki, M; Shiba, E; Toyama, T, 2021
)
0.62
"This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Kuntai capsule combined with leuprorelin acetate in the treatment of EMS by clinical effective rate, serum sex hormone levels estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, visual analogue scale, Kupperman score and incidence of adverse reactions."( The efficacy and safety of Kuntai capsule combined with leuprorelin acetate in the treatment of endometriosis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
An, W; Jia, L; Wang, L; Zhang, J; Zhang, S, 2021
)
0.62
" The primary outcome was safety, including bone mineral density (BMD) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)."( Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, in women with endometriosis-associated pain: phase 2 safety and efficacy 24-week results.
Kudou, K; Kusumoto, T; Osuga, Y; Seki, Y; Tanimoto, M; Terakawa, N, 2021
)
0.62
" The primary outcome was the time to first adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular event (composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) through 12 months."( Cardiovascular Safety of Degarelix Versus Leuprolide in Patients With Prostate Cancer: The Primary Results of the PRONOUNCE Randomized Trial.
Alexander, JH; Arney, L; Bhatt, DL; Bigelow, R; Clarke, NW; Doyle-Olsen, BT; Evans, CP; Goodman, SG; Higano, CS; Kristensen, H; Lopes, RD; Melloni, C; Nelson, AJ; Nilsson, J; Olesen, TK; Roe, MT; Slovin, SF; Sørensen, PS, 2021
)
0.89
" The study was terminated prematurely because of the smaller than planned number of participants and events, and no difference in major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year between patients assigned to degarelix or leuprolide was observed."( Cardiovascular Safety of Degarelix Versus Leuprolide in Patients With Prostate Cancer: The Primary Results of the PRONOUNCE Randomized Trial.
Alexander, JH; Arney, L; Bhatt, DL; Bigelow, R; Clarke, NW; Doyle-Olsen, BT; Evans, CP; Goodman, SG; Higano, CS; Kristensen, H; Lopes, RD; Melloni, C; Nelson, AJ; Nilsson, J; Olesen, TK; Roe, MT; Slovin, SF; Sørensen, PS, 2021
)
1.07
" The primary endpoint was the rate of occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and the secondary endpoint was no progression in the Tanner stage or regression by week 96 compared to baseline."( An open label, multicenter clinical trial that investigated the efficacy and safety of leuprorelin treatment of central precocious puberty in Chinese children.
Chen, X; Cheng, R; Du, H; Fu, J; Gong, H; Guo, Z; Hou, L; Hu, Y; Li, P; Liu, Y; Lu, F; Luo, F; Luo, X; Qian, Y; Qiu, W; Wang, Q; Wang, W; Wu, X; Xu, Z; Yang, Y; You, C; Zhang, H; Zhong, Y; Zhou, S, 2021
)
0.62
" The frequency and severity of adverse events (hot flushes, fatigue, sexual dysfunction) are comparable among the GnRH-A."( Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in prostate cancer: A comparative review of efficacy and safety.
Addla, S; Jain, M; Patil, K; Raja, T; Sarkar, KK; Sridhar, PS; Sud, R; Talreja, V, 2022
)
0.72
" The secondary outcomes embrace hormones parameters, pregnancy rate and adverse events."( Evaluation of safety and effectiveness of gestrinone in the treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Mello Gindri, I; de Mello Roesler, CR; de Souza Pinto, LP; Dos Santos, IK; Ferrari, G, 2023
)
0.91
" Regarding the side effects observed, gestrinone showed the same adverse events and increased the risk of acne and seborrhea when compared to other treatments."( Evaluation of safety and effectiveness of gestrinone in the treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Mello Gindri, I; de Mello Roesler, CR; de Souza Pinto, LP; Dos Santos, IK; Ferrari, G, 2023
)
0.91
"Based limited evidence available suggests that gestrinone appeared to be safe and may have some efficacy advantages over danazol, as well as other therapeutic interventions for treating endometriosis."( Evaluation of safety and effectiveness of gestrinone in the treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Mello Gindri, I; de Mello Roesler, CR; de Souza Pinto, LP; Dos Santos, IK; Ferrari, G, 2023
)
0.91
" These drugs are at increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) adverse events (AEs)."( Cardiovascular adverse events-related to GnRH agonists and GnRH antagonists: analysis of real-life data from Eudra-Vigilance and Food and Drug Administration databases entries.
Cicione, A; De Nunzio, C; Franco, A; Gravina, C; Grimaldi, MC; Guercio, A; Lombardo, R; Nacchia, A; Tema, G; Tubaro, A, 2023
)
0.91
"EV and FDA databases were queried and the number of CV adverse events (AEs) for degarelix, buserelin, goserelin, leuprorelin, triptorelin until September 2021 were recorded."( Cardiovascular adverse events-related to GnRH agonists and GnRH antagonists: analysis of real-life data from Eudra-Vigilance and Food and Drug Administration databases entries.
Cicione, A; De Nunzio, C; Franco, A; Gravina, C; Grimaldi, MC; Guercio, A; Lombardo, R; Nacchia, A; Tema, G; Tubaro, A, 2023
)
0.91
" No clinically relevant differences in adverse events were observed between subgroups in either treatment group."( Impact of Concomitant Prostate Cancer Medications on Efficacy and Safety of Relugolix Versus Leuprolide in Men With Advanced Prostate Cancer.
Bossi, A; Brown, B; Buckley, D; Cookson, MS; George, DJ; Lu, S; Saad, F; Saltzstein, DR; Selby, B; Shore, ND; Tombal, B; Tutrone, R, 2023
)
1.13
" After literature screening, data extraction and quality evaluation, effective rate, recurrence rate, pregnancy rate and adverse reaction rate were used as outcome indicators to evaluate the efficacy and safety of drugs."( Efficacy and safety of different subsequent therapies after fertility preserving surgery for endometriosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Ma, R; Mao, H; Wang, L; Xu, H; Zhang, L; Zhao, R; Zheng, Y, 2023
)
0.91
" Adverse reaction rate: the application of dienogest, leuprolide, danazol, gestrinone, mifepristone and LNG-IUS after EMT fertility preservation surgery was higher than that of placebo."( Efficacy and safety of different subsequent therapies after fertility preserving surgery for endometriosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Ma, R; Mao, H; Wang, L; Xu, H; Zhang, L; Zhao, R; Zheng, Y, 2023
)
1.16
" In the phase 3 HERO study, a 54% lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events was reported in men treated with the oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, relugolix, vs leuprolide."( Impact of Concomitant Cardiovascular Therapies on Efficacy and Safety of Relugolix vs Leuprolide: Subgroup Analysis from HERO Study in Advanced Prostate Cancer.
Brown, B; Cookson, MS; Fallick, M; Hanson, S; Lu, S; Mehlhaff, BA; Saad, F; Saltzstein, DR; Shore, ND; Tutrone, R, 2023
)
1.32
" Incidence and types of adverse events (AEs) among men who received these medications were mostly consistent with overall population results, with some increases in grade ≥ 3 and fatal AEs."( Impact of Concomitant Cardiovascular Therapies on Efficacy and Safety of Relugolix vs Leuprolide: Subgroup Analysis from HERO Study in Advanced Prostate Cancer.
Brown, B; Cookson, MS; Fallick, M; Hanson, S; Lu, S; Mehlhaff, BA; Saad, F; Saltzstein, DR; Shore, ND; Tutrone, R, 2023
)
1.13

Pharmacokinetics

Leuprolide is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist widely used in androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. The results of a pharmacokinetic study in male Sprague-Dawley rats showed improved transport of le uprolide from thiolated NPs.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Serum leuprorelin concentrations increased immediately after injection, reaching a peak concentration (range 13."( Human pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of leuprorelin acetate depot in prostatic cancer patients.
Mazzei, T; Mini, E; Periti, P; Rizzo, M, 1990
)
0.28
"The investigational objectives of this open, noncomparative phase I study were to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of a single dose of 11."( An evaluation of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of leuprorelin acetate 3M-depot in patients with advanced and metastatic carcinoma of the prostate.
Khan, MS; O'Brien, A, 1998
)
0.3
"In an open, randomized phase II pharmacokinetic study conducted in Germany and Italy, a total of 42 patients with advanced or metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) were treated for 9 months with the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LH-RH-a) leuprorelin acetate depot in two different formulations."( Comparison of LH-RH analogue 1-month depot and 3-month depot by their hormone levels and pharmacokinetic profile in patients with advanced prostate cancer.
Bargelloni, U; Cosciani, S; Fiaccavento, G; Guazzieri, S; Pagano, F; Tunn, UW, 1998
)
0.3
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
"The pharmacokinetic profile of leuprolide could be well-described by a 4-step release curve."( The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new sustained-release leuprolide acetate depot compared to market references.
Corrado, ME; Firbas, C; Jilma, B; Leitner, JM; Mayr, FB; Mis, R; Savulsky, C; Spiel, AO, 2008
)
0.87
" The pharmacokinetic profile of leuprolide during the first 3 months of treatment, evaluated in a subset of the study population (n = 12), showed sustained release of leuprolide from the formulation."( Effectiveness, pharmacokinetics, and safety of a new sustained-release leuprolide acetate 3.75-mg depot formulation for testosterone suppression in patients with prostate cancer: a Phase III, open-label, international multicenter study.
Germa, JR; Kaisary, AV; Karlin, GS; Leuratti, C; Marberger, M; Mis, R; Savulsky, C; Shore, ND, 2010
)
0.88
" The results of a pharmacokinetic study in male Sprague-Dawley rats showed improved transport of leuprolide from thiolated NPs as compared to leuprolide solution."( Thiolated chitosan nanoparticles for the nasal administration of leuprolide: bioavailability and pharmacokinetic characterization.
Augustijns, P; Barthelmes, J; Bernkop-Schnürch, A; Dünnhaput, S; Iqbal, J; Laffleur, F; Perera, G; Rahmat, D; Schlocker, W; Shahnaz, G; Vetter, A, 2012
)
0.83
"A pharmacokinetic substudy was conducted within a phase 3 clinical trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of two leuprolide acetate 3-month depot formulations in children with central precocious puberty (CPP), where the pharmacokinetics of leuprolide and the exposure-response relationship between leuprolide concentration and the probability of luteinizing hormone (LH) suppression were assessed."( Pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analyses of leuprolide following administration of leuprolide acetate 3-month depot formulations to children with central precocious puberty.
Chiu, YL; Chwalisz, K; Hosmane, B; Larsen, LM; Mostafa, NM; Pradhan, RS, 2014
)
0.86
" The objective of this study was to show that Bemfola(®) yields comparable clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles to Gonal-f(®) in healthy female subjects."( Comparison of pharmacokinetic and safety profiles between Bemfola(®) and Gonal-f(®) after subcutaneous application.
Gouya, G; Hemetsberger, T; Irps, C; Rettenbacher, M; Sator, M; Vcelar, B; Wolzt, M, 2016
)
0.43
"The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were performed using a non-linear mixed-effect modeling approach."( A semi-mechanistic integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of the testosterone effects of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist leuprolide in prostate cancer patients.
Lim, CN; Salem, AH, 2015
)
0.62
" Differences in PK between LA depot formulations were reflected in pharmacodynamic responses, with a higher rate of testosterone suppression and less escapes and acute-on-chronic responses for Formulation-A."( Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two leuprolide acetate 45 mg 6-month depot formulations in patients with prostate cancer.
Chwalisz, K; Larsen, L; Mattia-Goldberg, C; Mostafa, NM; Pradhan, RS; Spitz, A, 2014
)
0.64
"A liquid crystalline (LC) system, composed of phosphatidylcholine, sorbitan monoleate, and tocopherol acetate, was investigated to understand the in vivo transformation after subcutaneous injection, coupled with the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of the formulation."( The in vivo transformation and pharmacokinetic properties of a liquid crystalline drug delivery system.
Báez-Santos, YM; Lee, YN; Mun, EA; Otte, A; Park, K; Soh, BK, 2017
)
0.46
"Leuprolide, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist widely used in androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, suffers from a short circulating half-life like other peptide therapeutics."( PEGylated leuprolide with improved pharmacokinetic properties.
Fu, M; Guan, Y; Meng, Q; Zhang, T; Zhang, Y; Zhuang, X, 2020
)
2.4
"The pharmacokinetic characteristics of leuprorelin in two groups were consistent."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of the new prolonged-release leuprorelin acetate microspheres for injection compared with Enantone® in healthy Chinese male volunteers.
Chen, J; Chen, M; Cheng, D; Dai, X; Fan, L; Ge, Q; He, C; Li, X; Li, XL; Liu, B; Liu, Y; Shan, R; Shao, Z; Su, Y; Wang, H; Wang, Y; Xie, J; Yu, X; Zhang, Y; Zhou, H; Zhu, M; Zhu, X, 2021
)
0.62
" To improve the pharmacokinetic properties of peptide drugs, a fatty acid was conjugated with leuprolide for long-term action."( Determination of Leuprolide-Fatty Acid Conjugate in Rat Plasma Using LC-MS/MS and Its Pharmacokinetics after Subcutaneous Administration in Rats.
Cho, JY; Jin, HE; Lee, BJ; Lee, KW; Seo, SW; Seong, GS; Yoon, IS, 2022
)
1.28

Compound-Compound Interactions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Recent evidence that it depresses testosterone synthesis in humans prompted us to investigate the effects in rats of its administration alone or in combination with the gonadotropin releasing hormone superagonist analogue leuprolide."( Inhibition of testosterone production with ketoconazole alone and in combination with a gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue in the rat.
English, HF; Levine, HB; Santen, RJ; Santner, SJ, 1986
)
0.46
"To compare the efficacy and safety of bicalutamide and flutamide, each used in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing analogue (LHRH-A) therapy, in patients with untreated metastatic (Stage D2) prostate cancer."( A controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy, in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Casodex Combination Study Group.
Block, N; Jones, J; Kolvenbag, G; Patterson, AL; Sarosdy, M; Schellhammer, P; Sharifi, R; Soloway, M; Venner, P; Vogelzang, N, 1995
)
0.29
"These preliminary data suggest that the addition of cyclic sodium etidronate in combination with low-dose norethindrone to GnRH agonists is an effective means of ameliorating the hypoestrogenic side effects induced by GnRH agonist alone."( Effects of sodium etidronate in combination with low-dose norethindrone in patients administered a long-acting GnRH agonist: a preliminary report.
Fournet, N; Judd, HL; Surrey, ES; Voigt, B, 1993
)
0.29
"To review the outcome of therapy with maximal androgen blockade and compare the efficacy and safety of bicalutamide and flutamide, each used in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LHRH-A) therapy, in patients with untreated metastatic (Stage D2) prostate cancer."( Maximal androgen blockade for patients with metastatic prostate cancer: outcome of a controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy. Casodex Combination Study Group.
Block, N; Jones, J; Kolvenbag, G; Patterson, AL; Sarosdy, M; Schellhammer, P; Sharifi, R; Soloway, M; Venner, P; Vogelzang, N, 1996
)
0.29
" Because of its efficacy and tolerability profile, together with its convenient once-daily dosing formulation, bicalutamide represents a prime candidate for antiandrogen of first choice in combination with LHRH-A therapy in the treatment of men with metastatic prostate cancer."( Maximal androgen blockade for patients with metastatic prostate cancer: outcome of a controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy. Casodex Combination Study Group.
Block, N; Jones, J; Kolvenbag, G; Patterson, AL; Sarosdy, M; Schellhammer, P; Sharifi, R; Soloway, M; Venner, P; Vogelzang, N, 1996
)
0.29
"A randomized, multicenter trial, double-blind for antiandrogen therapy, compared the antiandrogens bicalutamide and flutamide, each combined with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy (LHRH-A) in 813 patients with Stage D2 prostate carcinoma."( A controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy, in patients with advanced prostate carcinoma. Analysis of time to progression. CASODEX Combination Study Group.
Block, NL; Chen, Y; Kolvenbag, GJ; Patterson, AL; Sarosdy, MF; Schellhammer, PF; Sharifi, R; Soloway, MS; Venner, PM; Vogelzang, NJ, 1996
)
0.29
"To evaluate the efficacy of chemoendocrine therapy for the initial treatment of stage D2 prostate cancer, we conducted a prospective randomized study which compared combined androgen blockade alone to that combined with UFT."( [Primary treatment for stage D2 prostate cancer: a randomized study of combined androgen blockade alone versus combined with UFT].
Akazawa, S; Aki, M; Hashine, K; Kuwahara, M; Sumiyoshi, Y; Takenaka, A; Yamamoto, A, 1999
)
0.3
" We observed a significant increase in lumbar and femoral bone mineral content, BMD, SD score, and bone mineral apparent density, compared with baseline in both groups of patients, regardless of whether they were treated with GH alone or in combination with LHRH-A."( Effects of treatment with GH alone or in combination with LHRH analog on bone mineral density in pubertal GH-deficient patients.
Avila, A; Cassorla, F; Eggers, M; Gajardo, H; Mericq, V, 2002
)
0.31
"205 patients with previously untreated stage C/D prostate cancer were randomized (1:1) to receive once-daily bicalutamide 80 mg or placebo, each combined with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist."( Superior anti-tumor efficacy of bicalutamide 80 mg in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist versus LHRH agonist monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced prostate cancer: interim results of a randomized study in Ja
Akaza, H; Arai, Y; Igawa, M; Kanetake, H; Kumon, H; Matsuda, T; Naito, S; Ohashi, Y; Soeda, A; Usami, M; Yamaguchi, A, 2004
)
0.32
"In Japanese patients with advanced prostate cancer, first-line treatment with bicalutamide 80 mg in combination with an LHRH agonist is superior to LHRH agonist monotherapy in terms of the antitumor response at 12 weeks, and also time to treatment failure and progression, and does not compromise treatment safety."( Superior anti-tumor efficacy of bicalutamide 80 mg in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist versus LHRH agonist monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced prostate cancer: interim results of a randomized study in Ja
Akaza, H; Arai, Y; Igawa, M; Kanetake, H; Kumon, H; Matsuda, T; Naito, S; Ohashi, Y; Soeda, A; Usami, M; Yamaguchi, A, 2004
)
0.32
"A total of 151 patients with prostate cancer, who were enrolled into this study from May 2001 to June 2003, were randomized to receive CAB therapy using a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (leuprorelin) combined with a steroidal antiandrogen (chlormadinone) or a nonsteroidal antiandrogen (bicalutamide)."( Hot flashes during androgen deprivation therapy with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist combined with steroidal or nonsteroidal antiandrogen for prostate cancer.
Hakariya, H; Hara, T; Hayashi, M; Igawa, T; Iwasaki, S; Kanetake, H; Kusaba, Y; Sakai, H; Tsurusaki, T; Yura, M, 2009
)
0.35
"GnRH analogue (GnRHa) combined with GH treatment has been proposed to increase adult height."( Randomized GH trial with two different dosages in combination with a GnRH analogue in short small for gestational age children: effects on metabolic profile and serum GH, IGF1, and IGFBP3 levels.
Bakker, B; de Ridder, M; Hokken-Koelega, A; Mul, D; Mulder, J; Rowaan, I; Schroor, E; van der Hulst, F; van der Kaay, D; van Elswijk, D; Willeboer, M, 2010
)
0.36
"Post-treatment prostate biopsy side-effects were evaluated in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer on endocrine therapy alone or combined with radiotherapy in the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-7 randomized trial."( Side-effects of post-treatment biopsies in prostate cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy alone or combined with radical radiotherapy in the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-7 randomized trial.
Ahlgren, G; Angelsen, A; Solberg, A; Tasdemir, I; Widmark, A, 2011
)
0.37
"To observe the clinical effect of tashinone IIA combined with endocrine therapy in treating advanced-stage prostate cancer."( Clinical research of Tashinone IIA combined with endocrine therapy in treating advanced-stage prostate cancer.
Li, F; Song, L; Tang, L; Tian, F; Wang, Z; Yang, J; Yu, Z, 2014
)
0.4
" Treatment with GnRHa combined with add-back therapy led to improved QOL, with no worsening of mood or menopausal side effects."( The Effects of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Combined with Add-Back Therapy on Quality of Life for Adolescents with Endometriosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
DiVasta, AD; Feldman, HA; Gordon, CM; Hornstein, MD; Laufer, MR; Sadler Gallagher, J; Stokes, NA, 2017
)
0.46
" monthly (n = 20; Leu+E group) in combination with TE at a dose of 1 or 2 mg daily for 1 year."( Cyproterone acetate vs leuprolide acetate in combination with transdermal oestradiol in transwomen: a comparison of safety and effectiveness.
Battista, G; Cerpolini, S; Gava, G; Martelli, V; Meriggiola, MC; Seracchioli, R, 2016
)
0.74
"Preliminary results from this retrospective observational pilot study suggest that CPA and Leu in combination with TE are equally effective in the suppression of gonadotrophins and testosterone levels over 1 year."( Cyproterone acetate vs leuprolide acetate in combination with transdermal oestradiol in transwomen: a comparison of safety and effectiveness.
Battista, G; Cerpolini, S; Gava, G; Martelli, V; Meriggiola, MC; Seracchioli, R, 2016
)
0.74
"This is a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled study that will compare the efficacy and safety of degarelix with those of existing GnRH agonists combined with (125)I-TPPB."( A comparative study on the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist in neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy combined with transperineal prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.
Aoki, M; Egawa, S; Kido, M; Miki, K; Sasaki, H; Takahashi, H, 2016
)
0.43
"We conducted an open-label, randomized controlled trial evaluating the appropriate treatment duration of leuprorelin acetate 3-month depot, TAP-144-SR (3M), administered postsurgically every 3 months for 2 years versus 3 or more (up to 5) years, in combination with tamoxifen, for 5 years in premenopausal endocrine-responsive breast cancer patients and reported similar survival benefit in the two treatment groups."( Comparison of quality of life between 2-year and 3-or-more-year administration of leuprorelin acetate every-3-months depot in combination with tamoxifen as adjuvant endocrine treatment in premenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive breast cancer: a r
Fujimoto, T; Iwase, H; Kurebayashi, J; Noguchi, S; Ohashi, Y; Shiba, E; Yamashita, H; Yoshida, M, 2018
)
0.48
" Clinical studies have shown that Kuntai capsule combined with leuprorelin acetate is effective in the treatment of EMS, which can relieve perimenopausal symptoms, but it lacks of evidence-based medical evidence."( The efficacy and safety of Kuntai capsule combined with leuprorelin acetate in the treatment of endometriosis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
An, W; Jia, L; Wang, L; Zhang, J; Zhang, S, 2021
)
0.62
"CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, The Cochrance Library, Embase, Web of Science, and other databases were searched by computer to collect randomized controlled trials of Kuntai capsule combined with leuprorelin acetate in the treatment of EMS."( The efficacy and safety of Kuntai capsule combined with leuprorelin acetate in the treatment of endometriosis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
An, W; Jia, L; Wang, L; Zhang, J; Zhang, S, 2021
)
0.62
"This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Kuntai capsule combined with leuprorelin acetate in the treatment of EMS by clinical effective rate, serum sex hormone levels estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, visual analogue scale, Kupperman score and incidence of adverse reactions."( The efficacy and safety of Kuntai capsule combined with leuprorelin acetate in the treatment of endometriosis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
An, W; Jia, L; Wang, L; Zhang, J; Zhang, S, 2021
)
0.62
"This study will provide reliable evidence-based evidence for the clinical application of Kuntai capsule combined with leuprorelin acetate in the treatment of EMS."( The efficacy and safety of Kuntai capsule combined with leuprorelin acetate in the treatment of endometriosis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
An, W; Jia, L; Wang, L; Zhang, J; Zhang, S, 2021
)
0.62

Bioavailability

Bioavailability of leuprolide acetate in healthy human male volunteers ranged from 4% to 18% and agreed well with particle size data. Relative oral bioavailability could be increased by nanoparticulate tablets up to 4.5 mg.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" bioavailability in rats was significantly increased by alpha-cyclodextrin (CD), EDTA, and solution volume."( Bioavailability of leuprolide acetate following nasal and inhalation delivery to rats and healthy humans.
Adjei, A; Chun, A; Miller, J; Sundberg, D, 1992
)
0.61
" Absolute bioavailability of leuprolide acetate in healthy human male volunteers ranged from 4% to 18% and agreed well with particle size data."( Pulmonary delivery of peptide drugs: effect of particle size on bioavailability of leuprolide acetate in healthy male volunteers.
Adjei, A; Garren, J, 1990
)
0.8
" The absolute bioavailability after vaginal administration of the 5% citric acid solution was 16."( Vaginal absorption of a potent luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (leuprolide) in rats II: mechanism of absorption enhancement with organic acids.
Mima, H; Okada, H; Yamazaki, I; Yashiki, T, 1983
)
0.49
" After vaginal administration, the fraction of the dose that reached the systemic circulation, the F value, was very high but the rate of absorption was very low; consequently there was a low peak level and persistence of serum level."( Serum concentration patterns of an LHRH agonist, gonadotrophins and sex steroids after subcutaneous, vaginal, rectal and nasal administration of the agonist to pregnant rats.
Yamazaki, I, 1984
)
0.27
" The vaginal absorption was enhanced by organic acids: citric, succinic, tartaric, and glycocholic; the absolute bioavailability increased to approximately 20%."( Vaginal absorption of a potent luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (leuprolide) in rats I: absorption by various routes and absorption enhancement.
Hirai, S; Mima, H; Ogawa, Y; Okada, H; Yamazaki, I; Yashiki, T, 1982
)
0.49
"To determine the difference in FSH bioavailability from IM and SC injection sites."( Differences in serum follicle-stimulating hormone uptake after intramuscular and subcutaneous human menopausal gonadotropin injection.
Dobbs, KE; Dumesic, DA; Dumesic, JA; Shapiro, SS, 1994
)
0.29
" Computed absorption rate constants for FSH after IM and SC injection differed significantly."( Differences in serum follicle-stimulating hormone uptake after intramuscular and subcutaneous human menopausal gonadotropin injection.
Dobbs, KE; Dumesic, DA; Dumesic, JA; Shapiro, SS, 1994
)
0.29
" Absolute bioavailability of the drug in typical emulsion systems ranged from approximately 3 to 10% and represent an improvement of about 100 fold in gastrointestinal bioavailability of this peptide."( Effect of formulation adjuvants on gastrointestinal absorption of leuprolide acetate.
Adjei, A; Bush, E; Diaz, G; Greer, J; Haviv, F; Johnson, E; Love, S, 1993
)
0.52
" One key facet of this study was to attempt to understand the distribution and ultimate bioavailability of the peptide dispersed in an inert polymer matrix."( XPS and TOF-SIMS microanalysis of a peptide/polymer drug delivery device.
Annapragada, A; Fu Lu, MY; John, CM; Odom, RW; Salvati, L, 1995
)
0.29
" It was found that the extent and rate of absorption were similar between humans and monkeys following sublingual dosing of leuprolide formulations."( Sublingual absorption of leuprolide: comparison between human and animal models.
Johnson, HW; Lu, MY; Qiu, Y; Reiland, TL, 1999
)
0.81
" Additional in vivo studies using conscious rats showed that the bioavailability of leuprolide was less than 1% for both ileal and colonic administration."( Permeability and absorption of leuprolide from various intestinal regions in rabbits and rats.
Hoffman, D; Lu, MF; Qiu, Y; Reiland, TL; Zheng, Y, 1999
)
0.81
"In order to develop nasal powder preparations with higher bioavailability for peptide delivery, the effect of a combination of hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) used as base materials and microenvironment for the drugs in the preparations was examined."( Mucosal drug delivery using cellulose derivatives as a functional polymer.
Makino, Y; Suzuki, Y, 1999
)
0.3
" In tracheostomized dogs, both formulations showed comparable pharmacokinetic parameters including Cmax, Tmax, AUC0-12 and bioavailability (F%), indicating that the taste-masking excipients do not have an effect on lung absorption of leuprolide acetate."( Pulmonary peptide delivery: effect of taste-masking excipients on leuprolide suspension metered-dose inhalers.
Adjei, AL; Barber, TE; Fulu, MY; Lee, DY; Zheng, JY, 2001
)
0.73
"5 mg, a new depot formulation of leuprolide acetate that uses the Atrigel drug delivery system, causing an increase in bioavailability and optimising testosterone suppression - two key features of depot hormone suppression."( A subcutaneous delivery system for the extended release of leuprolide acetate for the treatment of prostate cancer.
Perez-Marrero, R; Tyler, RC, 2004
)
0.85
"The purpose of this study was to investigate the transport mechanisms and causes of low bioavailability of leuprolide."( Transport of leuprolide across rat intestine, rabbit intestine and Caco-2 cell monolayer.
Dong, J; Feng, L; Guo, J; Jiang, G; Li, C; Li, Z; Ping, Q; Qi, S, 2004
)
0.91
" Relative percentage of bioavailability (F) for nasal treatments was calculated from plasma concentration vs time plots."( Preliminary investigation of the nasal delivery of liposomal leuprorelin acetate for contraception in rats.
Misra, A; Shahiwala, A, 2006
)
0.33
" Starting with the thienopyridin-4-one derivative 26d (T-98475) an optimization study was performed, which resulted in the identification of a highly potent and orally bioavailable LHRH receptor antagonist, 3-(N-benzyl-N-methylaminomethyl)-7-(2,6-difluorobenzyl)-4,7-dihydro-2-[4-(1-hydroxy-1-cyclopropanecarboxamido)phenyl]-5-isobutyryl-4-oxothieno[2,3-b]pyridine (33c)."( Design, synthesis, and structure-activity relationships of thieno[2,3-b]pyridin-4-one derivatives as a novel class of potent, orally active, non-peptide luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor antagonists.
Cho, N; Endo, S; Furuya, S; Harada, M; Hayase, Y; Imada, T; Imaeda, T; Kasai, S; Matsumoto, H; Sasaki, S; Suzuki, N, 2006
)
0.33
"The objective of this review is to critically discuss the formulations currently available on the market for leuprolide optimization and to consider how drug delivery plays an important role in improving the bioavailability of this compound."( Leuprolide acetate: pharmaceutical use and delivery potentials.
Montanari, S; Ponchel, G; Teutonico, D, 2012
)
2.03
"The purpose of this study was to develop thiolated nanoparticles to enhance the bioavailability for the nasal application of leuprolide."( Thiolated chitosan nanoparticles for the nasal administration of leuprolide: bioavailability and pharmacokinetic characterization.
Augustijns, P; Barthelmes, J; Bernkop-Schnürch, A; Dünnhaput, S; Iqbal, J; Laffleur, F; Perera, G; Rahmat, D; Schlocker, W; Shahnaz, G; Vetter, A, 2012
)
0.82
"2-fold improved oral bioavailability of leuprolide oleate SMEDDS compared to a leuprolide acetate control solution."( In vivo evaluation of an oral self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS) for leuprorelin.
Bernkop-Schnürch, A; Hauptstein, S; Hintzen, F; Laffleur, F; Müller, C; Perera, G, 2014
)
0.67
" Bioavailability of leuprolide following pulmonary administration was 75% higher compared to subcutaneously administered leuprolide."( Effect of protease inhibitors on pulmonary bioavailability of therapeutic proteins and peptides in the rat.
Amancha, KP; Hussain, A, 2015
)
0.74
" The bioavailability of leuprolide from PLGA-TG18 hybrid MPs was approximately four times higher than that from TG18 MP and PLGA MP alone using the same dose of leuprolide (6 mg/kg)."( In vivo evaluation of solid lipid microparticles and hybrid polymer-lipid microparticles for sustained delivery of leuprolide.
Baldursdottir, SG; Luo, X; Mu, H; Sun, X; Wu, C; Yang, M, 2019
)
1.03
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
" This study suggests that mucoadhesive buccal tablets containing self-assembled LON may effectively increase the medication adherence for pediatric and geriatric patients by improving the bioavailability and permeation rate of LEU."( Mucoadhesive buccal tablet of leuprolide and its fatty acid conjugate: Design, in vitro evaluation and formulation strategies.
Jin, H; Lee, BJ; Ngo, HV; Park, C, 2023
)
1.2

Dosage Studied

One hundred premenopausal women with uterine leiomyomas were treated with leuprolide acetate depot at a dosage of 3. It was found that the extent and rate of absorption were similar between humans and monkeys following sublingual dosing.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Further studies are needed to optimize the dosing regimen."( Nafarelin versus leuprolide in ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization: a randomized clinical trial.
DeCherney, AH; Gutmann, JN; Jones, EE; Lavy, G; Penzias, AS; Shamma, FN, 1992
)
0.62
" Studies on the dosage design of this new delivery system of leuprorelin are summarized."( [Once-a-month injectable microcapsules of leuprorelin acetate].
Ogawa, Y; Okada, H; Toguchi, H; Yamamoto, M, 1991
)
0.28
"Twenty-one children with early puberty have been evaluated to determine adequate dosage of depot leuprolide acetate."( Depot leuprolide acetate dosage for sexual precocity.
Baens-Bailon, RG; Lee, PA; Parker, KL, 1991
)
0.98
" dosing with leuprolide solution."( Pharmacokinetics of once-a-month injectable microspheres of leuprolide acetate.
Heya, T; Inoue, Y; Ogawa, Y; Okada, H; Toguchi, H; Ueno, H, 1991
)
0.89
"To determine the effects of reversible medical castration on prostatic size in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), 3 patients with BPH were treated with a GnRH analogue, leuprolide, for six months at a dosage of ."( Effect of a GnRH analogue (leuprolide) on benign prostatic hypertrophy.
Droller, M; Gabrilove, JL; Kirschenbaum, A; Levine, AC, 1987
)
0.76
" A significantly longer duration of stimulation requiring a significantly higher total dosage of gonadotropins was observed in LA cycles."( Impact of leuprolide acetate on the response to follicular stimulation for in vitro fertilization in patients with normal basal gonadotropin levels.
Acosta, AA; Brzyski, RG; Jones, GS; Kruithoff, CH; Muasher, SJ; Oehninger, S, 1989
)
0.68
"The pharmacokinetic behaviour of leuprolide acetate from a controlled release parenteral dosage form has been studied in rats and dogs."( Controlled release of LHRH agonist, leuprolide acetate, from microcapsules: serum drug level profiles and pharmacological effects in animals.
Heya, T; Ogawa, Y; Okada, H; Shimamoto, T, 1989
)
0.83
" These compounds are minimally toxic and may exhibit no plateau of the dose-response curve even at very high doses."( Effect of very high dose D-leucine6-gonadotropin-releasing hormone proethylamide on the hypothalamic-pituitary testicular axis in patients with prostatic cancer.
Demers, L; Drago, J; Dufau, M; Max, D; Santen, RJ; Warner, B; Worgul, TJ, 1983
)
0.27
" After 2 weeks of GnRH-A treatment, the plasma T level was reduced from 2506 +/- 170 (pg/ml +/- SEM) in the intact, nontreated animals to 907 +/- 69 in the intact, GnRH-A-treated group, indicating that the dosage of GnRH-A used in this study had an inhibiting effect on T secretion."( Effects of chronic D-Leu6, des-Gly10-gonadotropin releasing hormone ethylamide on male sex tissues.
Heber, D; Peng, S; Rajfer, J; Swerdloff, RS, 1984
)
0.27
" The vaginal absorption from jellies, as practical dosage forms, yielded sufficient activity of leuprolide, but absorption was slightly reduced with highly polar polymers or with higher concentrations of polymers."( Vaginal absorption of a potent luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (leuprolide) in rats I: absorption by various routes and absorption enhancement.
Hirai, S; Mima, H; Ogawa, Y; Okada, H; Yamazaki, I; Yashiki, T, 1982
)
0.71
" CONCLUSION -- The model was found to be responsive to the GnRH agonist agents evaluated and could discriminate between dosage levels."( Effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, nafarelin, buserelin, and leuprolide, on experimentally induced endometriosis in the rat.
Mizutani, T; Sakata, M; Terakawa, N,
)
0.36
"83 microgram/kg leuprolide acetate (LA) on a 12-hour dosing schedule."( Evaluation of the impact of concurrent gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration on GnRH agonist-induced gonadotrope desensitization.
Carey, KD; Illions, EH; Navot, D; Scott, RT, 1995
)
0.64
"Intranasal nafarelin at a dosage of 200 micrograms twice daily or LA at a dose of 1 mg/d SC was administered."( Comparison between nafarelin and leuprolide acetate for in vitro fertilization: preliminary clinical study.
Asch, RH; Balmaceda, JP; Dantas, ZN; Stone, SC; Vicino, M, 1994
)
0.57
" Continued use of leuprolide acetate at maximum therapeutic dosage and over longer periods of time produced even more striking and significant changes in the disabling and debilitating symptoms of functional bowel disease."( Effect of leuprolide acetate in patients with functional bowel disease. Long-term follow-up after double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Clench, MH; Mathias, JR; Reeves-Darby, VG; Roberts, PH, 1994
)
1.02
"25 mg of CE or the equivalent dosage of other Es be prescribed when planning long-term GnRH-a ovarian suppression."( Long-term gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist with standard postmenopausal estrogen replacement failed to prevent vertebral bone loss in premenopausal women.
Hodsman, AB; Nisker, JA; Sugimoto, AK, 1993
)
0.29
" Because of its efficacy and tolerability profile, together with its convenient once-daily dosing formulation, bicalutamide represents a prime candidate for antiandrogen of first choice in combination with LHRH-A therapy in the treatment of men with metastatic prostate cancer."( Maximal androgen blockade for patients with metastatic prostate cancer: outcome of a controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy. Casodex Combination Study Group.
Block, N; Jones, J; Kolvenbag, G; Patterson, AL; Sarosdy, M; Schellhammer, P; Sharifi, R; Soloway, M; Venner, P; Vogelzang, N, 1996
)
0.29
"A LA dose-response study was done in women receiving depot LA plus estrogen-progestin replacement."( Dose-response effect of depot leuprolide acetate on serum androgens in hirsute women.
Arab, DM; Lehman, L; Rittmaster, RS, 1996
)
0.58
" No differences were observed for days of stimulation, peak oestradiol attained, total dosage of exogenous gonadotrophins, or number of aspirated oocytes."( A combination of norethindrone acetate and leuprolide acetate blocks the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonistic response and minimizes cyst formation during ovarian stimulation.
Ditkoff, EC; Sauer, MV, 1996
)
0.56
" There were also no statistical differences in the HMG dosage (26."( Subcutaneous low dose leuprolide acetate depot versus leuprolide acetate for women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization.
Chang, CC; Chen, CM; Lo, HY; Tsai, HD, 1995
)
0.61
" No significant differences were noted between the two dosage protocols with respect to the other outcome measures."( A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical effects of split- versus single-dose human menopausal gonadotropins in an assisted reproductive technology program.
Clarke, RN; Fox, JH; Friedman, AJ; Hornstein, MD; Jackson, KV; Rein, MS, 1996
)
0.29
" Since nafarelin injection is no longer produced, studies were conducted to determine the dosage of leuprolide that would yield equivalent responses."( Acute hormonal responses to the gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist leuprolide: dose-response studies and comparison to nafarelin--a clinical research center study.
Barnes, RB; Ehrmann, DA; Perovic, N; Rosenfield, RL, 1996
)
0.74
" Mean testosterone levels remained well within the castrate range throughout each dosing interval."( Leuprolide acetate 22.5 mg 12-week depot formulation in the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer.
Bruskewitz, RC; Gittleman, MC; Graham, SD; Hudson, PB; Sharifi, R; Stein, B,
)
1.57
" No differences were noted in days of stimulation, peak estradiol (E2) level attained, peak E2-to-oocyte ratio, dosage of exogenous gonadotropins, number of aspirated oocytes, fertilization rate, or oocyte and preembryo quality."( The addition of norethindrone acetate to leuprolide acetate for ovarian suppression has no adverse effect on ovarian stimulation.
Ditkoff, EC; Lindheim, S; Prosser, R; Sauer, MV; Zimmermann, RC, 1997
)
0.56
" In particular, preclinical studies in the appropriate animal model are usually necessary to assess the potential feasibility of a continuous-release dosage form."( Protein delivery from biodegradable microspheres.
Cleland, JL, 1997
)
0.3
"Patients with stage D2 and poor-prognosis stage D1 prostate cancer were given suramin on a pharmacokinetically derived dosing schedule to maintain suramin concentrations between 175 and 300 micrograms/mL."( Phase II trial of suramin, leuprolide, and flutamide in previously untreated metastatic prostate cancer.
Bergan, RC; Cooper, MR; Dawson, NA; Figg, WD; Myers, CE; Reed, E; Sartor, O; Sausville, EA; Senderowicz, AM; Steinberg, SM; Tompkins, A; Weinberger, B, 1997
)
0.59
" Thus the standard dosage of LH-RH analogue is considered to be adequate for hemodialysis patients."( [Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone for prostate cancer in a hemodialysis patient: a case report].
Kontani, K; Mizusawa, H; Okaneya, T; Yoneyama, T, 1997
)
0.3
" Low-dose gonadotrophin stimulation is then initiated on the third day of withdrawal bleeding in the form of either human menopausal gonadotrophins or purified urinary follicle-stimulating hormone at a dosage of 150 IU/day."( Dual suppression with oral contraceptives and gonadotrophin releasing-hormone agonists improves in-vitro fertilization outcome in high responder patients.
Barmat, L; Damario, MA; Davis, OK; Liu, HC; Rosenwaks, Z, 1997
)
0.3
" Using our dosage regimen, 'chemical oophorectomy' with leuprolide was not as effective as surgical oophorectomy in the prevention of chemical carcinogenesis by DMBA but was comparable to the results obtained with tamoxifen."( Prevention of DMBA-induced rat mammary carcinomas comparing leuprolide, oophorectomy, and tamoxifen.
Brackett, DJ; Hanas, JS; Hollingsworth, AB; Lerner, MR; Lightfoot, SA; McCay, PB; Wilkerson, KB, 1998
)
0.79
" Fifty-one patients whose IVF stimulation protocols during the two cycles were identical except for the leuprolide dosage utilized for luteal pituitary suppression were included in the study."( Ovarian estradiol production in vivo. Inhibitory effect of leuprolide acetate.
Barmat, L; Damario, M; Davis, O; Kowalik, A; Liu, HC; Rosenwaks, Z, 1998
)
0.76
"Lowering the dosage of leuprolide allows higher estradiol levels in those patients."( Ovarian estradiol production in vivo. Inhibitory effect of leuprolide acetate.
Barmat, L; Damario, M; Davis, O; Kowalik, A; Liu, HC; Rosenwaks, Z, 1998
)
0.85
" It was found that the extent and rate of absorption were similar between humans and monkeys following sublingual dosing of leuprolide formulations."( Sublingual absorption of leuprolide: comparison between human and animal models.
Johnson, HW; Lu, MY; Qiu, Y; Reiland, TL, 1999
)
0.81
" Dosage has been tapered over that period to a low but effective dose."( Sexual behaviors in autism: problems of definition and management.
Realmuto, GM; Ruble, LA, 1999
)
0.3
" Drug recovery from the loop 5 h after dosing was 10."( Permeability and absorption of leuprolide from various intestinal regions in rabbits and rats.
Hoffman, D; Lu, MF; Qiu, Y; Reiland, TL; Zheng, Y, 1999
)
0.59
" These observations have important implications for product dosing and the design and interpretation of neoadjuvant and intermittent androgen ablative trials."( Serum testosterone-based luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist redosing schedule for chronic androgen ablation: a phase I assessment.
Oefelein, MG, 1999
)
0.3
" A more flexible approach to guidelines will be necessary in the development of new dosage forms in Japan."( Sterility assurance of microspheres.
Toguchi, H, 1999
)
0.3
" Suramin was administered on a 78-day fixed dosing schedule (one cycle), and suramin treatment cycles were repeated every 6 months for a total of four cycles."( Androgen deprivation and four courses of fixed-schedule suramin treatment in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group Study.
Crawford, ED; Eisenberger, MA; Fisher, EI; Hussain, M; O'Connor, J; Petrylak, DP; Small, EJ; Wood, DP, 2000
)
0.31
" First, a dose-response study of 12 males (mean age, 16."( Estrogen suppression in males: metabolic effects.
Hayes, V; Klein, KO; Mauras, N; O'Brien, KO, 2000
)
0.31
" This confirms the adequacy of 4-week dosing to maintain estradiol and gonadotropin suppression in adult women treated with leuprolide acetate, but raises the question whether less frequent dosing may be possible in some situations, or whether higher doses may be needed in some situations for an even greater degree of estradiol suppression."( Estradiol suppression and recovery during leuprolide acetate treatment in women as determined weekly by an ultrasensitive recombinant cell bioassay.
Klein, KO; Larmore, KA, 2000
)
0.78
" Also, there is great individual variation in the circulating E2 concentration by administering the same dosage of CEE."( Regulation of dosage of conjugated equine estrogen is useful for add-back therapy.
Hayashi, M; Hoshimoto, K; Ohkura, T, 2000
)
0.31
" The antral follicle count correlated significantly with the patient age, dosage of gonadotropins, serum estradiol concentration, number of antral follicles (> or = 13 mm) while receiving hCG injections, number of oocytes retrieved, and, later, number of embryos transferred."( Determination of the efficiency of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-suppression cycle using the initial follicle count during gonadotropin stimulation.
Chang, HW; Chang, SY; Huang, FJ; Kung, FT; Tsai, MY; Wu, JF, 2001
)
0.31
"The goals of this study were to determine the CDB-4022 dose-response relationship for induction of acute decreases in testicular weight and germ cell depopulation in rats; establish the threshold dose of CDB-4022 required to induce infertility; and investigate whether CDB-4022-induced testicular damage could be prevented by a GnRH agonist (Lupron Depot)."( Lupron depot prevention of antispermatogenic/antifertility activity of the indenopyridine, CDB-4022, in the rat.
Blye, RP; Hild, SA; Meistrich, ML; Reel, JR, 2001
)
0.31
") total dosage of hMG (ampoules) (37."( Clinical evaluation of three different gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues in an IVF programme: a prospective study.
Al-Mizyen, E; Al-Shawaf, T; Bhide, M; El-Nemr, A; Gillott, C; Grudzinskas, JG; Khalifa, Y; Lower, AM, 2002
)
0.31
"The 2 formulations produced nearly identical patterns of testosterone suppression which included uniform suppression throughout the duration of the dosing intervals."( Serum testosterone suppression and potential for agonistic stimulation during chronic treatment with monthly and 3-month depot formulations of leuprolide acetate for advanced prostate cancer.
Browneller, R; Sharifi, R, 2002
)
0.52
"We conclude that monthly and 3-month sustained release (depot) formulations of leuprolide acetate provide consistent, uniform suppression of serum testosterone throughout the respective dosing intervals, and that the initial depot injection of each formulation provides sufficient pituitary desensitization to prevent agnostic stimulation of serum testosterone during chronic treatment."( Serum testosterone suppression and potential for agonistic stimulation during chronic treatment with monthly and 3-month depot formulations of leuprolide acetate for advanced prostate cancer.
Browneller, R; Sharifi, R, 2002
)
0.74
" Flare-up GnRH agonist protocols (including all dosage varieties) produce better results than standard long luteal protocols."( Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: a systematic review.
Bontis, J; Grimbizis, G; Tarlatzis, BC; Zepiridis, L,
)
0.13
" During the dosing period, the ovarian follicle diameter and count were measured by transvaginal ultrasonography."( Ovarian follicular development stimulated by leuprorelin acetate plus human menopausal gonadotropin in chimpanzees.
Hayasaka, I; Honda, R; Ide, Y; Mori, Y; Nakagata, N; Nakashima, T; Okamura, H; Shimoda, K; Torii, R; Yoshikawa, Y; Yoshimoto, N, 2005
)
0.33
" Among the parameters assessed were the number of days of gonadotrophin stimulation, changes in the daily dosage of gonadotrophins, total ampoules of gonadotrophins, embryo implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates and ongoing pregnancy rates."( Impact of duration and dose of gonadotrophins on IVF outcomes.
Arici, A; Mahutte, NG; Martin, JR; Sakkas, D, 2006
)
0.33
"Implanted multi-reservoir arrays improve dosing control relative to osmotic pumps or polymer depots."( Dosage form development, in vitro release kinetics, and in vitro-in vivo correlation for leuprolide released from an implantable multi-reservoir array.
Krieger, TJ; Lipka, S; Prescott, JH; Staples, MA, 2007
)
0.56
" Current dosing of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists does not include monitoring the end organ response of serum testosterone."( Determining dosing intervals for luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists based on serum testosterone levels: a prospective study.
Pacificar, JS; Pathak, AS; Shapiro, CE; Williams, SG, 2007
)
0.34
" The median dosing interval was 6 months (range 5 to 12)."( Determining dosing intervals for luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists based on serum testosterone levels: a prospective study.
Pacificar, JS; Pathak, AS; Shapiro, CE; Williams, SG, 2007
)
0.34
" Early data suggest that using serum testosterone to guide luteinizing hormone releasing hormone dosing is safe, efficacious and cost-effective."( Determining dosing intervals for luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists based on serum testosterone levels: a prospective study.
Pacificar, JS; Pathak, AS; Shapiro, CE; Williams, SG, 2007
)
0.34
" Food had a minimal effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of the NmT+D formulation but decreased the maximum observed concentration after dosing (C(max)) for CpT+D."( Nanomilled oral testosterone plus dutasteride effectively normalizes serum testosterone in normal men with induced hypogonadism.
Amory, JK; Bremner, WJ; Bush, MA; Caricofe, RB; Clark, RV; Page, ST; Smith, PM; Zhi, H,
)
0.13
" Following dosing with leuprolide, circulating testosterone was increased significantly in comparison to vehicle-treated mice."( In vivo evaluation and in vitro metabolism of leuprolide in mice--mass spectrometry-based biomarker measurement for efficacy and toxicity.
Balafas, V; Katsila, T; Kostomitsopoulos, N; Matsoukas, J; Sofianos, ZD; Tamvakopoulos, C; Tselios, T, 2008
)
0.91
" The optimum (possibly higher) dosage of cetrorelix for this purpose has not yet been established."( A randomised controlled trial comparing GnRH antagonist cetrorelix with GnRH agonist leuprorelin for endometrial thinning prior to transcervical resection of endometrium.
Bentick, B; Bhatia, K; Doonan, Y; Giannakou, A, 2008
)
0.35
" The mean dosage of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) required for COH (2,354."( Comparison of clinical efficacy between a single administration of long-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and daily administrations of short-acting GnRHa in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles.
Cheon, KW; Choi, BC; Lee, HB; Lee, SC; Song, SJ; Yoo, KJ; Yu, SY, 2008
)
0.35
" In vitro, testosterone, estradiol and progesterone were also reduced by LA, even though this reduction occurred for progesterone only at the highest LA dosage (10(-6)M; 606."( Leuprolide acetate reduces both in vivo and in vitro ovarian steroidogenesis in infertile women undergoing assisted reproduction.
Abreu, LG; Ferriani, RA; Rosa-e-Silva, AC; Silva, AL; Silva-de-Sá, MF, 2008
)
1.79
" Three dosing regimens were evaluated: a starting dose of 240 mg of degarelix subcutaneous (s."( The efficacy and safety of degarelix: a 12-month, comparative, randomized, open-label, parallel-group phase III study in patients with prostate cancer.
Andreou, C; Boccon-Gibod, L; Cantor, P; Jensen, JK; Klotz, L; Olesen, TK; Persson, BE; Schröder, FH; Shore, ND, 2008
)
0.35
"To examine the duration of serum testosterone and prostate-specific antigen suppression after each dose of a 4-month depot leuprolide acetate for 18 months and to assess the potential for using serum testosterone as a guide for redosing the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs instead of using fixed dosing intervals."( Efficacy over time of LHRH analogs in the treatment of PCa--a prospective analysis using serum testosterone to determine dosing intervals.
Greil, S; Kleer, E; Robinson, EA; Singal, B, 2009
)
0.56
"5 mg; therefore, adequate dosing may be important for optimal outcome."( Comparison of three doses of leuprolide acetate in the treatment of central precocious puberty: preliminary results.
Avila, A; Hernández, MI; Iñiguez, G; Klein, KO; Lammoglia, JJ; Mericq, V; Unanue, N; Villaroel, C, 2009
)
0.64
" Acylated-ghrelin was measured by applying an extraction method using C18 columns followed by radio immunological dosage with antibody and peninsula tracer."( Variations in blood ghrelin levels in prostate cancer patients submitted to hormone suppressive treatment.
Bertaccini, A; Guidi, M; Marchiori, D; Martorana, G; Pagotto, U; Palladoro, F; Palmieri, F; Pernetti, R; Vitullo, G, 2009
)
0.35
"Variable dosing of leuprolide acetate is needed to achieve similar amounts of hormonal suppression, yet small changes in dose did not significantly change LH or estradiol levels or predicted height."( Importance of leuprolide acetate variable dosing for precocious puberty: a range of acceptable suppression.
Cohen, D; Janfaza, M; Klein, KO, 2009
)
1.04
" Women with hypothalamic amenorrhea (n = 2) responded normally to a single GnRH-agonist injection; however, repeated dosing did not seem to induce the normal priming effect."( Potential diagnostic utility of intermittent administration of short-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in gonadotropin deficiency.
Ehrmann, DA; Rosenfield, RL; Zimmer, CA, 2010
)
0.36
" The sperm-release responses reported have been correspondingly diverse, highlighting a need to quantify dose-response relationships on a species-specific basis."( Effects of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone and arginine-vasotocin on the sperm-release response of Günther's Toadlet, Pseudophryne guentheri.
Silla, AJ, 2010
)
0.36
" Three dosing regimens currently exist: calendar-based, intermittent, and a testosterone (T)-based (T-based) regimen."( Early development of castrate resistance varies with different dosing regimens of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist in primary hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.
Blumberg, JM; Cheetham, TC; Chien, GW; Kwon, EO; Loo, RK; Niu, F; Pacificar, J; Shapiro, CE; Williams, SG, 2011
)
0.37
" Patients were grouped according to their dosing regimen: calendar-based, intermittent dosing, and T-based."( Early development of castrate resistance varies with different dosing regimens of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist in primary hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.
Blumberg, JM; Cheetham, TC; Chien, GW; Kwon, EO; Loo, RK; Niu, F; Pacificar, J; Shapiro, CE; Williams, SG, 2011
)
0.37
" Calendar-based dosing was used in 325 patients; 252 received T-based dosing and 115 received intermittent dosing."( Early development of castrate resistance varies with different dosing regimens of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist in primary hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.
Blumberg, JM; Cheetham, TC; Chien, GW; Kwon, EO; Loo, RK; Niu, F; Pacificar, J; Shapiro, CE; Williams, SG, 2011
)
0.37
"During the time period studied, T-based and intermittent dosing regimen of LHRH agonist had lower rates of early castrate resistance compared with standard calendar dosing, based on measurements for early androgen resistance."( Early development of castrate resistance varies with different dosing regimens of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist in primary hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.
Blumberg, JM; Cheetham, TC; Chien, GW; Kwon, EO; Loo, RK; Niu, F; Pacificar, J; Shapiro, CE; Williams, SG, 2011
)
0.37
" Each determination method was fully validated and applied for the analysis of LPR in its pharmaceutical dosage form."( A novel sensitive electrochemical DNA biosensor for assaying of anticancer drug leuprolide and its adsorptive stripping voltammetric determination.
Dogan-Topal, B; Ozkan, SA, 2011
)
0.6
" No differences in estradiol levels, growth velocity, or bone age progression were observed in dosing groups."( A randomized trial of 1- and 3-month depot leuprolide doses in the treatment of central precocious puberty.
Chi, C; Fuld, K; Neely, EK, 2011
)
0.63
" Multi-monthly DL is effective in treating CPP, but higher dosing may be required in some circumstances."( A randomized trial of 1- and 3-month depot leuprolide doses in the treatment of central precocious puberty.
Chi, C; Fuld, K; Neely, EK, 2011
)
0.63
" A shorter duration of stimulation, a lower dosage of recombinant FSH consumption and a thinner endometrium on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration were all observed in the GnRH antagonist group."( Low-dose GnRH antagonist protocol is as effective as the long GnRH agonist protocol in unselected patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
Chen, CK; Huang, HY; Huang, SY; Lee, CL; Soong, YK; Wang, HS; Yu, HT, 2011
)
0.37
" GH was measured every 10 min, and GH responses were assessed by nonlinear dose-response analysis."( Sex steroids, GHRH, somatostatin, IGF-I, and IGFBP-1 modulate ghrelin's dose-dependent drive of pulsatile GH secretion in healthy older men.
Bowers, CY; Miles, JM; Norman, C; Veldhuis, JD, 2012
)
0.38
" Notably, testosterone levels were reduced to castrate levels within 3 d and remained depleted throughout the 4-wk dosing period, an effect that was faster and more pronounced than leuprolide (1 nmol/h) dosing."( Chronic administration of the metastin/kisspeptin analog KISS1-305 or the investigational agent TAK-448 suppresses hypothalamic pituitary gonadal function and depletes plasma testosterone in adult male rats.
Asami, T; Ishikawa, K; Kitada, C; Kumano, S; Kusaka, M; Matsui, H; Nishizawa, N; Ohtaki, T; Suzuki, A; Takatsu, Y; Tanaka, A; Terada, M; Yokoyama, K, 2012
)
0.57
" From our findings and current knowledge, more stringent follow-up or changes in dosage or dosage intervals of LHRH agonist therapy in those with a greater or high BMI is not warranted."( Relationship between body mass index and serum testosterone concentration in patients receiving luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist therapy for prostate cancer.
Bui, HN; Heijboer, AC; Meuleman, EJ; ter Haar, RW; van der Sluis, TM; van Moorselaar, RJ; Vis, AN, 2013
)
0.39
" Using a daily dosing regimen with lead-in, concurrent, and post-XRT therapy, the recommended phase 2 dose of sunitinib is 25 mg daily."( Sunitinib plus androgen deprivation and radiation therapy for patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer: results from a multi-institutional phase 1 study.
Corn, PG; DePetrillo, TA; Heath, E; Kuban, D; Maier, J; Mathew, P; Meyn, R; Song, DY, 2013
)
0.39
" This profound testosterone-lowering effect was sustained throughout 4-week dosing periods."( Pharmacologic profiles of investigational kisspeptin/metastin analogues, TAK-448 and TAK-683, in adult male rats in comparison to the GnRH analogue leuprolide.
Akinaga, Y; Ban, J; Ikeda, Y; Kiba, A; Kumano, S; Kusaka, M; Masaki, T; Matsui, H; Matsumoto, S; Nakata, D; Ohtaki, T; Suzuki, A; Takatsu, Y; Tanaka, A; Watanabe, T; Yamaguchi, M, 2014
)
0.6
"Children diagnosed with CPP (N = 42 in each dosing cohort), who were treatment naïve or previously treated, received a total of two intramuscular injections of either leuprolide acetate depot 11."( Pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analyses of leuprolide following administration of leuprolide acetate 3-month depot formulations to children with central precocious puberty.
Chiu, YL; Chwalisz, K; Hosmane, B; Larsen, LM; Mostafa, NM; Pradhan, RS, 2014
)
0.85
" In addition, 30 mg of TAP-144-SR (6M) was administered subcutaneously to six subjects, and, on the basis of the results, the optimal clinical dosage of TAP-144-SR (6M) in Japan was considered to be 22."( [A phase II pharmacological study of leuprolide acetate 6-month depot, TAP-144-SR (6M), in treatment-Nazve patients with prostatic cancer who received a single subcutaneous or intramuscular injection].
Akaza, H; Fujimoto, T; Komura, E; Okamoto, H; Takabayashi, N, 2014
)
0.68
" The developed model adequately describes the leuprolide-testosterone relationship and can potentially be used to facilitate design of clinical studies for new formulations, to aid in the selection of candidate formulations, and for the optimization of doses and dosing schemes."( A semi-mechanistic integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of the testosterone effects of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist leuprolide in prostate cancer patients.
Lim, CN; Salem, AH, 2015
)
0.88
"This was a longitudinal, randomized, dose-response GH trial involving 107 short SGA children (58 girls) treated with GH until AH (GH randomized 1 or 2 mg/m(2)/d during puberty)."( Metabolic Health in Short Children Born Small for Gestational Age Treated With Growth Hormone and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analog: Results of a Randomized, Dose-Response Trial.
Bakker-van Waarde, WM; Hokken-Koelega, AC; Lem, AJ; Neijens, FS; Noordam, C; Odink, RJ; Oostdijk, W; Schroor, EJ; van der Hulst, FJ; van der Kaay, DC; van der Steen, M; Westerlaken, C, 2015
)
0.42
" Low body mass index, low baseline LH, and higher total dosage of gonadotropins required for stimulation were associated with an increased risk of having an inadequate response to the GnRH agonist trigger."( Assessing the adequacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist leuprolide to trigger oocyte maturation and management of inadequate response.
Beall, SA; Chang, FE; Cox, JM; DeCherney, AH; Levy, MJ; Richter, KS, 2016
)
0.67
"High gonadotropin dosage does NOT affect euploidy and pregnancy rates in PGS cycles with single embryo transfer."( High gonadotropin dosage does not affect euploidy and pregnancy rates in IVF PGS cycles with single embryo transfer.
Barash, OO; Hinckley, MD; Ivani, KA; Rosenbluth, EM; Weckstein, LN, 2017
)
0.46
" In order to recruit an adequate number of follicles, the average dosage of gonadotropins administered during controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles often increases significantly with advancing maternal age."( High gonadotropin dosage does not affect euploidy and pregnancy rates in IVF PGS cycles with single embryo transfer.
Barash, OO; Hinckley, MD; Ivani, KA; Rosenbluth, EM; Weckstein, LN, 2017
)
0.46
"Euploidy rates within the same age group were not statistically different regardless of the total dosage of gonadotropins used or the number of eggs retrieved."( High gonadotropin dosage does not affect euploidy and pregnancy rates in IVF PGS cycles with single embryo transfer.
Barash, OO; Hinckley, MD; Ivani, KA; Rosenbluth, EM; Weckstein, LN, 2017
)
0.46
" A sample size of 504 (84 subjects per group) was calculated to provide ≥80% power to detect a dose-related treatment effect among placebo and ASP1707 doses in change from baseline in pelvic pain, assuming different dose-response curves after 12 weeks of treatment."( Efficacy and safety of ASP1707 for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain: the phase II randomized controlled TERRA study.
Besuyen, R; D'Hooghe, T; Fukaya, T; Holtkamp, GM; López, B; Miyazaki, K; Osuga, Y; Skillern, L, 2019
)
0.51
" Leuprolide acetate dosage of 10 μg/kg was proctored intramuscular for 5 weeks, commencing the day after the lesion."( Leuprolide Acetate, a GnRH Agonist, Improves the Neurogenic Bowel in Ovariectomized Rats with Spinal Cord Injury.
Altamira-Camacho, M; Calderón-Vallejo, D; Cruz, Y; Kovacs, K; Medina-Aguiñaga, D; Quintanar, JL; Rotondo, F, 2020
)
2.91
"Nonadherence to dosing schedules for androgen deprivation therapy increases the risk of testosterone escape for patients with prostate cancer."( Impact of Late Dosing on Testosterone Suppression with 2 Different Leuprolide Acetate Formulations: In Situ Gel and Microsphere. An Analysis of United States Clinical Data.
Concepcion, RS; Crawford, ED; Cross, CK; Gordan, LN; Hafron, JM; Harris, RG; Higano, CS; Kader, AK; Keane, TE; Moul, JW; Petrylak, DP; Shore, ND; Tagawa, ST; Twardowski, PW, 2021
)
0.86
" Analyses used 2 definitions of "month," "28-day" (late dosing after day 28, 84, 112 or 168) and "extended" (late dosing after day 32, 97, 128 and 194)."( Impact of Late Dosing on Testosterone Suppression with 2 Different Leuprolide Acetate Formulations: In Situ Gel and Microsphere. An Analysis of United States Clinical Data.
Concepcion, RS; Crawford, ED; Cross, CK; Gordan, LN; Hafron, JM; Harris, RG; Higano, CS; Kader, AK; Keane, TE; Moul, JW; Petrylak, DP; Shore, ND; Tagawa, ST; Twardowski, PW, 2021
)
0.86
"The 200 mg twice daily dosage of elagolix is more likely to be preferred over leuprolide by patients with moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain in all scenarios explored in the evaluation and sensitivity analyses."( Patient preferences for elagolix and leuprolide for treating endometriosis-related pain in the United States.
Agarwal, SK; Poulos, C; Soliman, AM; Tekin, S, 2021
)
1.12
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (3)

RoleDescription
antineoplastic agentA substance that inhibits or prevents the proliferation of neoplasms.
gonadotropin releasing hormone agonistAny drug which binds to gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors and triggers a response.
anti-estrogenA drug which acts to reduce estrogenic activity in the body, either by reducing the amount of estrogen or by reducing the activity of whatever estrogen is present.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (1)

ClassDescription
oligopeptideA peptide containing a relatively small number of amino acids.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (2)

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00050.00010.12895.2000AID102819; AID267082; AID267085
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.00060.00030.15422.0000AID102815; AID102947; AID267084
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki5,370,319,732,736,000.00000.00383.51866.5000AID102938
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (4)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
gonadotropin secretionGonadotropin-releasing hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to gonadotropin-releasing hormoneGonadotropin-releasing hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayGonadotropin-releasing hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hormone stimulusGonadotropin-releasing hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (2)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
peptide bindingGonadotropin-releasing hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor activityGonadotropin-releasing hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (2)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneGonadotropin-releasing hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
membraneGonadotropin-releasing hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGonadotropin-releasing hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (88)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID496819Antimicrobial activity against Plasmodium falciparum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID693376Metabolic stability in mouse renal epithelial cell membranes assessed as compound remaining at 10 nM measured at 30 mins2012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 58Rationally designed cyclic analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: enhanced enzymatic stability and biological properties.
AID1145199Induction of FSH release in ovariectomized estrogen/progesterone-treated rat at 100 ng, sc measured after 15 mins to 60 hrs post dose by RIA relative to LH-RH1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 19, Issue:3
Analogs of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone with increased biological activity produced by D-amino acid substitutions in position 6.
AID496817Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma cruzi2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID693380Tmax in overnight fasted C57BL/6N mouse at 1 mg/kg, ip2012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 58Rationally designed cyclic analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: enhanced enzymatic stability and biological properties.
AID693381Half life in overnight fasted C57BL/6N mouse at 1 mg/kg, ip2012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 58Rationally designed cyclic analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: enhanced enzymatic stability and biological properties.
AID496821Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID678713Inhibition of human CYP2C9 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 7-methoxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin-3-acetic acid as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID267087Inhibition of LHRH-stimulated arachidonic acid release in CHO cells expressing monkey LHRH receptor2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 49, Issue:13
Design, synthesis, and structure-activity relationships of thieno[2,3-b]pyridin-4-one derivatives as a novel class of potent, orally active, non-peptide luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor antagonists.
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID497005Antimicrobial activity against Pneumocystis carinii2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID267086Inhibition of LHRH-stimulated arachidonic acid release in CHO cells expressing human LHRH receptor2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 49, Issue:13
Design, synthesis, and structure-activity relationships of thieno[2,3-b]pyridin-4-one derivatives as a novel class of potent, orally active, non-peptide luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor antagonists.
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID693378Metabolic stability in overnight fasted C57BL/6N mouse plasma at 1 mg/kg, ip2012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 58Rationally designed cyclic analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: enhanced enzymatic stability and biological properties.
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID496824Antimicrobial activity against Toxoplasma gondii2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID678715Inhibition of human CYP2D6 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 4-methylaminoethyl-7-methoxycoumarin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID693379Cmax in overnight fasted C57BL/6N mouse at 1 mg/kg, ip2012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 58Rationally designed cyclic analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: enhanced enzymatic stability and biological properties.
AID496820Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID693391Agonist activity at LHRH1 receptor in C57BL/6N mouse assessed as release of testosterone in plasma at 1 ug/kg, ip in presence of cetrorelix2012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 58Rationally designed cyclic analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: enhanced enzymatic stability and biological properties.
AID693387Agonist activity at LHRH1 receptor in C57BL/6N mouse assessed as testosterone AUC (1 to 6 hrs) at 1 mg/kg, ip2012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 58Rationally designed cyclic analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: enhanced enzymatic stability and biological properties.
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID496831Antimicrobial activity against Cryptosporidium parvum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID496828Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania donovani2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID693390Agonist activity at LHRH1 receptor in C57BL/6N mouse assessed as release of testosterone in plasma at 1 ug/kg, ip2012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 58Rationally designed cyclic analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: enhanced enzymatic stability and biological properties.
AID496823Antimicrobial activity against Trichomonas vaginalis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID678722Covalent binding affinity to human liver microsomes assessed per mg of protein at 10 uM after 60 mins presence of NADPH2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID102947The compound was tested for the concentration to inhibit 50% of [125 I]leuprorelin binding to Leutinizing releasing hormone receptor in the membrane fractions of the rat pituitary1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-22, Volume: 41, Issue:22
Discovery of a novel, potent, and orally active nonpeptide antagonist of the human luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) receptor.
AID16102Clearance in rat after iv dose (100 ug/kg)1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-05, Volume: 36, Issue:3
Effect of N-methyl substitution of the peptide bonds in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists.
AID693383Clearance in overnight fasted C57BL/6N mouse at 1 mg/kg, ip2012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 58Rationally designed cyclic analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: enhanced enzymatic stability and biological properties.
AID102819The Compound was tested for the concentration to inhibit 50% of [125 I ]leuprorelin binding to the cloned human Leutinizing releasing hormone receptor1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-22, Volume: 41, Issue:22
Discovery of a novel, potent, and orally active nonpeptide antagonist of the human luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) receptor.
AID267082Inhibition of [125I]leuprorelin binding to human recombinant LHRH receptor expressed in CHO cells2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 49, Issue:13
Design, synthesis, and structure-activity relationships of thieno[2,3-b]pyridin-4-one derivatives as a novel class of potent, orally active, non-peptide luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor antagonists.
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID496832Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID693375Displacement of [125I]-Tyr6, His5 from human LHRH1 receptor expressed in HEK 293 cells after 16 to 19 hrs by gamma counter2012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 58Rationally designed cyclic analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: enhanced enzymatic stability and biological properties.
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID693382AUC in overnight fasted C57BL/6N mouse at 1 mg/kg, ip2012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 58Rationally designed cyclic analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: enhanced enzymatic stability and biological properties.
AID496830Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania major2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID678721Metabolic stability in human liver microsomes assessed as GSH adduct formation at 100 uM after 90 mins by HPLC-MS analysis2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID189942Intestinal stability against rat jejunum sac, activity is expressed as T1/21993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-05, Volume: 36, Issue:3
Effect of N-methyl substitution of the peptide bonds in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists.
AID693386Metabolic stability in overnight fasted C57BL/6N mouse plasma assessed as compound remaining at 50 ng/mL, ip2012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 58Rationally designed cyclic analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: enhanced enzymatic stability and biological properties.
AID197342Tested in vitro for LH release from cultured rat pituitary cells, activity is expressed as pD2 value1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-05, Volume: 36, Issue:3
Effect of N-methyl substitution of the peptide bonds in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists.
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID496825Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania mexicana2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID693384Drug excretion in overnight fasted C57BL/6N mouse assessed as elimination rate constant at 1 mg/kg, ip2012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 58Rationally designed cyclic analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: enhanced enzymatic stability and biological properties.
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID1145197Induction of luteinizing hormone release in ovariectomized estrogen/progesterone-treated rat at 100 ng, sc measured after 15 mins to 60 hrs post dose by RIA relative to LH-RH1976Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 19, Issue:3
Analogs of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone with increased biological activity produced by D-amino acid substitutions in position 6.
AID1535409Suppression of plasma testosterone level in Crl:CD(SD) rat at 2 nmol/hr administered via subcutaneous osmotic pumps measured after 6 days by radioimmunoassay2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 02-15, Volume: 29, Issue:4
A new class of pentapeptide KISS1 receptor agonists with hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis activation.
AID102938In vitro binding affinity for rat pituitary LHRH receptor, activity is expressed as pKI value1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-05, Volume: 36, Issue:3
Effect of N-methyl substitution of the peptide bonds in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists.
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID409954Inhibition of mouse brain MAOA2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 51, Issue:21
Quantitative structure-activity relationship and complex network approach to monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors.
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID496826Antimicrobial activity against Entamoeba histolytica2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID24472Chymotrypsin degradation half-life was determined1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-05, Volume: 36, Issue:3
Effect of N-methyl substitution of the peptide bonds in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists.
AID267084Inhibition of [125I]leuprorelin binding to rat anterior pituitary LHRH receptor2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 49, Issue:13
Design, synthesis, and structure-activity relationships of thieno[2,3-b]pyridin-4-one derivatives as a novel class of potent, orally active, non-peptide luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor antagonists.
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID678714Inhibition of human CYP2C19 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 3-butyryl-7-methoxycoumarin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID693385Metabolic stability in overnight fasted C57BL/6N mouse plasma assessed as compound remaining at 5 ng/mL, ip2012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 58Rationally designed cyclic analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: enhanced enzymatic stability and biological properties.
AID678716Inhibition of human CYP3A4 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using diethoxyfluorescein as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID102815The compound was tested for the concentration to inhibit 50% of [125 I]leuprorelin binding to Leutinizing releasing hormone receptor the membrane fractions of the monkey pituitary1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-22, Volume: 41, Issue:22
Discovery of a novel, potent, and orally active nonpeptide antagonist of the human luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) receptor.
AID496818Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei brucei2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID409956Inhibition of mouse brain MAOB2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 51, Issue:21
Quantitative structure-activity relationship and complex network approach to monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors.
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID496827Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania amazonensis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID678712Inhibition of human CYP1A2 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using ethoxyresorufin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID496829Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania infantum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID678717Inhibition of human CYP3A4 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 7-benzyloxyquinoline as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID267085Inhibition of [125I]leuprorelin binding to monkey anterior pituitary LHRH receptor2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 49, Issue:13
Design, synthesis, and structure-activity relationships of thieno[2,3-b]pyridin-4-one derivatives as a novel class of potent, orally active, non-peptide luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor antagonists.
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID1755775In vivo agonist activity at GnRH-R in C57BL6/N mouse assessed as release of testosterone in blood at 483.6 ug/kg, ip measured after 2 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347159Primary screen GU Rhodamine qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347160Primary screen NINDS Rhodamine qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346012Rat GnRH1 receptor (Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone receptors)1994Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 135, Issue:1
Stable transfection of GH3 cells with rat gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor complementary deoxyribonucleic acid results in expression of a receptor coupled to cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate-dependent prolactin release via a G-protein.
AID1346002Human GnRH1 receptor (Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone receptors)2007Endocrinology, Feb, Volume: 148, Issue:2
Pharmacological characterization of a novel nonpeptide antagonist of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor, NBI-42902.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (2,936)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-1990195 (6.64)18.7374
1990's981 (33.41)18.2507
2000's909 (30.96)29.6817
2010's679 (23.13)24.3611
2020's172 (5.86)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 90.83

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index90.83 (24.57)
Research Supply Index8.26 (2.92)
Research Growth Index5.07 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index166.97 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (90.83)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials777 (25.21%)5.53%
Reviews249 (8.08%)6.00%
Case Studies466 (15.12%)4.05%
Observational15 (0.49%)0.25%
Other1,575 (51.10%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (334)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Intermittent Hormonal Therapy With Leuprorelin (3.75 mg SR) and Flutamide in the Treatment of Stage D2 or Tx Nx M1 ≠ M1a Metastatic Cancer of the Prostate [NCT00817739]Phase 2341 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-12-31Completed
"Special Drug Use Surveillance of Leuplin PRO for Injection Kit 22.5 mg in Premenopausal Breast Cancer" [NCT03209518]312 participants (Actual)Observational2016-03-18Completed
A Randomized Three Arm Phase II Study of (1) Everolimus, (2) Estrogen Deprivation Therapy (EDT) With Leuprolide + Letrozole and (3) Everolimus + EDT in Patients With Unresectable Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma (FLL-HCC) [NCT01642186]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-12Completed
Randomized Clinical Trial of the Pharmacodynamics of Lorelin Depot 3.75Mg (Leuprorelin Acetate) Produced by Laboratório Químico Farmacêutico Bergamo LTDA. Compared to Lupron Depot ® 3.75 Mg Produced by Abbott in Healthy Subjects [NCT01071005]Phase 158 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
A Phase 2 Study of Darolutamide in Combination With Leuprolide Acetate in Hormone-Therapy Naive Recurrent and/or Metastatic Androgen Receptor (AR) Positive Salivary Gland Cancer [NCT05669664]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-20Recruiting
Vascular Mechanisms for the Effects of Loss of Ovarian Hormone Function on Cognition in Women [NCT02122198]17 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-08Completed
A Phase 1/2, Open Label Study in Men With Prostate Cancer to Assess the Safety. Pharmacokinetics and Testosterone-Lowering Efficacy of TAK-448, Administered as a 1-Month Depot, Including a Randomized Portion With a Group Administered Leuprorelin [NCT01132404]Phase 1/Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Developing new formulation of study drug. New study to open next year under a new protocol.)
Influence of Male Hormones on Regional Fat Metabolism [NCT01160328]Phase 139 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of GnRH Agonist for the Preservation of Ovarian Function After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) [NCT01343368]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Terminated
A Phase IV Interventional Safety Study of ELIGARD® in Prostate Cancer Patients in Asia (ELIGANT) [NCT03035032]Phase 4107 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-23Completed
An Observational, Retrospective Study to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Effectiveness of Leuprorelin in the Treatment of Central Precocious Puberty [NCT02993926]108 participants (Actual)Observational2017-06-24Completed
Radiation Therapy and Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery for Prostate Cancer (RADICALS) [NCT00541047]Phase 34,236 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Double Blinded Randomized Crossover Phase III Study of Oral Thalidomide Versus Placebo in Patients With Stage D0 Androgen Dependent Prostate Cancer Following Limited Hormonal Ablation [NCT00004635]Phase 3159 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-03-01Completed
A Phase III Randomized Prospective Trial of Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy in Surgically Treated Prostate Cancer Patients at High Risk for Recurrence [NCT00003645]Phase 364 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-06-14Terminated(stopped due to Per PI request)
Regulation of Cervical Mucus Secretion [NCT02969590]Phase 45 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-29Completed
Clinical Trial to Investigate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of CKD-841 After Subcutaneous Injection in Postmenopausal Female [NCT03233932]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
Psychological Impact of Amenorrhea in Women With Endometriosis: Perspective Randomized Study [NCT02393482]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-30Not yet recruiting
HERO: A Multinational Phase 3 Randomized, Open-label, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Relugolix in Men With Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT03085095]Phase 31,134 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-18Completed
Evaluation of the Testosterone Suppressive Effect in Healthy Male Volunteers of a Novel Leuprolide Acetate 3.75mg Depot (Lutrate) VS Market Reference Leuprolide Acetate 3.75mg Depot (Enantone) [NCT03662958]48 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-08-01Recruiting
Comparison of the Operation and Medical Treatment of Endometriosis and Adenomyosis [NCT03778359]5,000 participants (Actual)Observational2005-01-01Completed
Phase II Trial of Zometa on Bone Mineral Density on Patients With Stage D Prostate Cancer Undergoing Androgen Ablation Therapy [NCT00582556]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
Prospective Multicenter Observational Program for Evaluation of Efficacy and Tolerability of the 6-month Depot Eligard 45 mg in Patients With Advanced Prostate Carcinoma in Routine Clinical Practice of Uro-Oncologists in the Russian Federation [NCT02128334]645 participants (Actual)Observational2013-09-30Completed
Real-life Observational Study of Patients After 3-months of Leuprorelin 5mg Implant and Evaluation of Coping Strategies Among Patients With Prostate Cancer: LEPTO STUDY [NCT03990194]800 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-03-30Not yet recruiting
Phase II Study Evaluating HSV-tk + Valacyclovir Gene Therapy in Combination With Androgen Deprivation Therapy, Brachytherapy, External Beam Radiotherapy, and Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT03541928]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-08-02Recruiting
An Open-label, Single Arm, Multicenter, Phase III Study on the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of FP-001 42 mg Controlled Release in Patients With Central (Gonadotropin-Dependent) Precocious Puberty (Casppian Study) [NCT05493709]Phase 393 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-02Recruiting
Comparative Study Between ICSI Results in Transvaginal Ultrasound Guided Embryo Transfer and Transabdominal Ultrasound Guided Embryo Transfer [NCT03683043]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-30Not yet recruiting
Evidence-based Medical Research on the Treatment of Children's Rapid Progressive Central Precocious Puberty With Integrative Chinese and Western Medicine [NCT03963752]Phase 4164 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-15Recruiting
The Impact of Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation Following Radical Prostatectomy on Prostate Cancer Recurrence [NCT05169112]Phase 340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-06Recruiting
A Phase 3 Study of Androgen Annihilation in High-Risk Biochemically Relapsed Prostate Cancer [NCT03009981]Phase 3504 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-06Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2 Trial of Radium Ra 223 Dichloride in Combination With Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Patients With Oligometastatic Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT03361735]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Prostate Cancer [NCT02346253]163 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-13Active, not recruiting
A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase II Study of Systemic and Tumor Directed Therapy for Recurrent Oligometastatic M1 Prostate Cancer [NCT03902951]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-17Active, not recruiting
Phase III Study of Image Guided Radiation Therapy With or Without Androgen Suppression for Intermediate Risk Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT01492972]Phase 3192 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-01-31Recruiting
Ovarian Suppression Plus Letrozole Plus Everolimus for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Tamoxifen and Ovarian Suppression Pretreated, Premenopausal Women With Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer[LEO] [NCT02344550]Phase 2137 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Efficacy of Recombinant FSH/GnRH Antagonist Protocol With and Without LH Adjunct and GnRH Agonist Trigger for Egg Bank Donation [NCT02069808]Phase 438 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial of GnRH Agonist and Progesterone Versus Progesterone Only for Luteal Phase Support in Antagonist Cycles [NCT02262416]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-31Not yet recruiting
Phase II Study of Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy With Letrozole in Patients With Estrogen Receptor Positive/HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer [NCT03497702]Phase 2114 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-08Recruiting
Multi-Institutional Prospective Pilot Study of Lupron to Enhance Lymphocyte Immune Reconstitution Following Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation in Post-Pubertal Children and Adults With Molecular Imaging Evaluation [NCT01338987]Phase 276 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-19Completed
A Phase 1/2 Study of Darolutamide and Abemaciclib in High-Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT05617885]Phase 1/Phase 293 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-09Recruiting
A Single Dose lead-in PK Followed by a Randomized, Double-blinded, Controlled, Multiple Dose Study of the Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulator Progenta (CDB-4124) in Pre-menopausal Women With Symptomatic Leiomyomata [NCT01069094]Phase 1/Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
Phase III Trial of Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy and Standard Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) With a GNRH Agonist vs. Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy and Enhanced ADT With a GNRH Agonist and TAK-700 For Men With High Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT01546987]Phase 3239 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Active, not recruiting
Effects of the Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System Compared With the Leuprolide Acetate in Patients With Endometriosis: a Randomized Trial [NCT02158845]Phase 444 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Testosterone Regulation of the Natriuretic Peptide System [NCT02269072]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of funding)
"Special Drug Use Surveillance of Leuplin PRO for Injection Kit 22.5 mg for Prostate Cancer" [NCT03209492]333 participants (Actual)Observational2016-04-01Completed
A Phase 3, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Safety And Efficacy Study of Oakwood Laboratories' Leuprolide Acetate For Injectable Suspension 22.5 mg In Patients With Prostate Cancer [NCT00598312]Phase 3201 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
COMPLEEMENT-1: An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Ribociclib (LEE011) in Combination With Letrozole for the Treatment of Men and Pre/Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-positive (HR+) HER2-negative (HE [NCT02941926]Phase 33,246 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-30Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Efficacy and Safety Study of Enzalutamide Plus Leuprolide, Enzalutamide Monotherapy, and Placebo Plus Leuprolide in Men With High-Risk Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Progressing After Definitive Therapy [NCT02319837]Phase 31,068 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-17Active, not recruiting
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Combined Radiotherapy and Adjuvant Hormone Therapy (Leuprorelin SR 11.25 mg) and Hormone Therapy Alone (Leuprorelin SR 11.25 mg) in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer (T3-T4 or pT3 on Biopsy, N0, M0) [NCT01122121]Phase 3273 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-03-31Completed
Phase III Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of TAK-385 40 mg Compared With Leuprorelin in Patients With Endometriosis [NCT03931915]Phase 3335 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-08Completed
Relugolix Versus Leuprolide in Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Open-Label Study to Assess Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (REPLACE-CV) [NCT05605964]Phase 32,250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-25Recruiting
A Phase II Study Comparing Salvage Radiotherapy in Combination With 6 Months of Androgen-deprivation Therapy Versus Anti-androgen Therapy With Apalutamide in Patients With Biochemical Progression After Radical Prostatectomy [NCT03899077]Phase 2202 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-05Recruiting
Phase II Evaluation of Early Oral Estramustine, Oral Etoposide and Intravenous Paclitaxel in Combination With Hormone Therapy in Patients With High-Risk Metastatic Adenocarinoma of the Prostate [NCT00028769]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-12-31Completed
A PHASE III TRIAL OF THE STUDY OF ENDOCRINE THERAPY USED AS A CYTOREDUCTIVE AND CYTOSTATIC AGENT PRIOR TO RADIATION THERAPY IN GOOD PROGNOSIS LOCALLY CONFINED ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE [NCT00002597]Phase 32,028 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-10-31Completed
The Effects of GnRH-a on Angiogenesis of Endometriosis [NCT06106932]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Initiation of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer Using Degarelix Acetate Followed by Leuprolide Acetate [NCT01344564]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Radiation With Androgen Deprivation: Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone and Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone Agonist Prior to Radiation Therapy [NCT01023061]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
CLASSICAL ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL IN COMPARISON WITH AGONIST STOP PROTOCOL IN Polycystic Ovary Symdrome WOMEN UNDERGOING Intra-cytoplasmic Injection TRIAL: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04094467]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-07Recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Radioimmunoguided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Prostate Cancer [NCT00653757]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Advanced Salivary Gland Carcinoma Based on Molecular Typing [NCT05924256]Phase 266 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-26Recruiting
Estrogen Deficiency and Mechanisms of Fat Accumulation [NCT00687739]Phase 379 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Multi-center, Active Controlled, Pharmacokinetic, Safety and Efficacy Study of Proellex in Pre-Menopausal Women With Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids to Assess Persistence of Response [NCT00683917]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Repros stopped the study for safety and FDA put the study on hold for safety.)
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Open-Label Evaluation of MENOPUR® Versus FOLLISTIM® in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) Patients [NCT00805935]Phase 4110 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A Phase III Study of Neoadjuvant Docetaxel and Androgen Suppression Plus Radiation Therapy Versus Androgen Suppression Alone Plus Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Localized Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT00651326]Phase 348 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-02Terminated(stopped due to Poor accrual)
Does a GnRH Agonist Given at Embryo Transfer Improve Clinical Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates of Women Undergoing In-Vitro Fertilization? [NCT03544073]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-15Withdrawn(stopped due to The investigators were not able to get grant funding for this study.)
The LUCINDA Trial: LeUprolide Plus Cholinesterase Inhibition to Reduce Neurological Decline in Alzheimer's [NCT03649724]Phase 2180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-27Recruiting
"Specified Drug-Use Survey of Leuprorelin Acetate Injection Kit 11.25 mg All-Case Investigation: Spinal and Bulbar Muscular Atrophy (SBMA)" [NCT03555578]300 participants (Anticipated)Observational2017-11-02Recruiting
The Association Between HSD3B1 Genotype and Steroid Metabolism in Normal and Prostate Cancer Tissue of Men With Intermediate and High-risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy After Treatment With Apalutamide and Leuprolide [NCT02770391]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-17Completed
Down-regulated Hormonally Controlled Cycles for Vitrification-warmed Blastocyst Transfers: Reduces Time to Transfer and Cycle Cancellation [NCT02238431]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to no patient uptake)
Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmaco-kinetics of Leuprolide Acetate for Injection 3.75mg (Depot) (Leuprorelin) Administered in Subjects With Advanced Adenocarcinoma of Prostate: A Randomized, Active Controlled, Comparative, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Phase 3 Stu [NCT04914195]Phase 3155 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-07-01Completed
A Randomized Study of Finite Androgen Ablation vs. Finite Androgen Ablation in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone in Patients With Prostate Cancer Who Have PSA Progression After Prostatectomy and/or Radiotherapy [NCT01786265]Phase 2310 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-02-05Active, not recruiting
An Open Label, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Leuprorelin in the Treatment of Central Precocious Puberty [NCT02427958]Phase 4307 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-07Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group, Active-control PK/PD Study of Three Doses of Leuprolide Oral Tablets in Comparison to an IM Dose of Leuprolide in Healthy Female Volunteers [NCT02807363]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-23Completed
Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group, Multi-centre Phase II Clinical Trial of Active Cellular Immunotherapy With Preparation DCVAC/PCa in Combination With Hormone Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT02107391]Phase 263 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
To Evaluate the Effect of GnRH Agonist Administered in the Luteal Phase on ART Cycle Outcomes in Both GnRH Agonist and GnRH Antagonist Treated Ovarian Stimulation Protocols [NCT02114645]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-04-30Not yet recruiting
Menopausal Sleep Fragmentation: Impact on Body Fat Gain Biomarkers in Women [NCT03047330]Phase 4125 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-15Completed
A Phase I Trial to Evaluate Acute and Late Toxicities of Concurrent Treatment With Everolimus (RAD001) and Radio-Hormonotherapy in High-risk Prostate Cancer.(RHOMUS) [NCT00943956]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Immediate or Early Salvage Post-operative External Radiotherapy Combined With Concomitant and Adjuvant Hormonal Treatment Versus Immediate or Early Salvage Postoperative External Radiotherapy Alone in pT3a-b R0-1 cN0M0 / pT2R1 cN0M0, Gleason Score 5-10 Pr [NCT00949962]Phase 387 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Poorly recruiting)
Long-term Effects of Enhanced Systemic Therapy and Tumor-directed Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Confirmed by Conventional Imaging Modality: a Prospective, Single-arm Study. [NCT05212857]Phase 2160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-30Recruiting
Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) and the Onset of Puberty [NCT00734279]Early Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter, Phase III, 2-Arm Study of Androgen Deprivation With Leuprolide, +/- Docetaxel for Clinically Asymptomatic Prostate Cancer Subjects With a Rising PSA Following Definitive Local Therapy [NCT00514917]Phase 3413 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Company decision to discontinue the study, not due to any safety or efficacy concerns)
Autonomic and Renal Contributions to Hypertension With Androgen Deprivation Therapy [NCT05700903]Phase 4228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-20Recruiting
A Randomized, Phase II Study of GW786034 (Pazopanib) in Stage D0 Relapsed Androgen Sensitive Prostate Cancer Following Limited GnRH Agonist Therapy [NCT00454571]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Postoperative Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy and Hormonal Therapy in Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Phase II Trial [NCT04249154]Phase 277 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-03Recruiting
Ulipristal Acetate Versus GnRH Analogue Treatment Before Hysteroscopic Resection of Uterine Leiomyoma [NCT02361879]Phase 4146 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-02-28Recruiting
Phase II-III Trial of Adjuvant Radiotherapy Following Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Adjuvant Docetaxel [NCT03070886]Phase 2/Phase 3175 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-16Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Pre-retrieval Triggering Methods in in Vitro Fertilization Patients Classified as Low, Normal or High Responder [NCT02715336]Phase 4666 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-31Recruiting
Anti-Androgens and Cabazitaxel in Defining Complete Response in Prostatectomy (ACDC-RP Trial): A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-centre Phase-2 Study Evaluating the Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With [NCT02543255]Phase 276 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Abraxane Plus Hormonal Therapy as Initial Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT00521781]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor decision)
Apalutamide Plus Intermittent Hormone Therapy (IHT) Versus IHT Alone in Prostate Cancer Patients With Biochemical Recurrence [NCT02811809]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Withdrawn due to operational issues. The study was withdrawn early, before enrolling its first participant.)
A Controlled Trial on Adenomyosis Treatment Comparing Aromatase Inhibitor Plus GnRH Analogue Versus GnRH Analog Alone [NCT03421639]Phase 4300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-12-01Recruiting
An Open Label, Multicenter, Single-arm and Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Leuprorelin 3M in the Treatment of Central Precocious Puberty (CPP) [NCT05341115]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-14Recruiting
PCOS, Sleep Apnea and Metabolic Risk in Women [NCT00696111]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-12-31Active, not recruiting
"A Phase IIA Study of Sequential (First Strike, Second Strike) Therapies, Modeled on Evolutionary Dynamics of Anthropocene Extinctions, for High Risk Metastatic Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer" [NCT05189457]Phase 231 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-25Recruiting
A Phase II Neoadjuvant Trial of Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) Plus Hormonal Ablation for Patients Who Have High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer and Will Undergo Prostatectomy [NCT00329043]Phase 264 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-05-31Active, not recruiting
Phase II, Multicenter, Single Arm Trial to Assess the Feasibility of First Line Ribociclib in Combination With a Non Steroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Elderly Patients With Hormone Receptor Positive/HER2 Negative Advanced Breast Cancer [NCT03944434]Phase 2116 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-27Active, not recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Somatropin in Combination With Leuprorelin Compared to Somatropin Alone in Pubertal Children With Idiopathic Short Stature [NCT00355030]Phase 391 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
An Open-label, Multi-Centre, Randomized, Parallel-group Study, Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Degarelix One Month Dosing Regimens; 160 mg (40 mg/ml) and 80 mg (20mg/ml), in Comparison to LUPRON DEPOT® 7.5 mg in Patients With Prostate Cancer Requ [NCT00295750]Phase 3620 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Efficacy and Tolerance of Cyproterone Acetate Versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Versus Venlafaxine LP in the Treatment of Hot Flushes Caused by Leuprorelin 11.25 mg in Patients Treated for a Prostate Adenocarcinoma [NCT01011751]Phase 3311 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Neoadjuvant Androgen Depletion in Combination With Vorinostat Followed by Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Total Androgen-Receptor Gene Expression Targeted Therapy (TARGET) [NCT00589472]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
3 Months, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Study of the Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics and Safety of TAP-144SR 1-month Depot Gelatin-Free vs. Gelatin-Containing Formulation in Female Patients With Uterine Fibroids [NCT00776074]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Phase II Interstitial Brachytherapy Combined With Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Prior External Beam Irradiation [NCT00684905]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2000-04-30Completed
Study of Lupron Depot In The Treatment of Central Precocious Puberty [NCT00660010]Phase 355 participants (Actual)Interventional1991-01-31Completed
A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of NBI-56418 in Subjects With Endometriosis [NCT00797225]Phase 2174 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-26Completed
Monitoring Tolerance, Safety and Acceptance of Depo-Eligard® in an Open Label, Retrospective, Non-interventional Clinical Trial [NCT00811876]140 participants (Actual)Observational2008-09-30Completed
The Effect of Elagolix in Comparison to Leuprolide Acetate on in Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Cycle Outcomes After a Transfer of Euploid Embryos to Patients With Surgically Diagnosed Endometriosis: A Pilot Trial [NCT04445025]Early Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Recruiting
A Phase II Randomized Study of Palbociclib in Combination With Exemestane Plus GnRH Versus Capecitabine in Premenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT02592746]Phase 2182 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-06-30Active, not recruiting
Phase II Trial of Temporary Androgen Deprivation Therapy in High Risk Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy [NCT00937768]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Terminated
The Role of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Management of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Oligometastases: An Adaptive Phase II/III Randomized Trial. [NCT02685397]Phase 2/Phase 3130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-31Recruiting
Androgen Deprivation and Localized Radiotherapy to Metastases in Patients With Oligometastatic Hormone - Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT00544830]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-18Active, not recruiting
Utility of Exosomal microRNAs to Predict Response to Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT02366494]60 participants (Anticipated)Observational2015-04-29Active, not recruiting
Comparing the Safety and Efficacy in the Use of Dienogest, Leuprolide Acetate, DMPA and Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills (Microgynon) on Endometriosis Patients After Conservative Surgery [NCT06145438]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-04Recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Treatment Protocols to Optimize Outcomes in Poor Responder In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Patients: E2 Patch/Antagonist Protocol Versus OCP/Microdose Lupron Protocol [NCT00826839]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to poor enrollment)
A Multicenter Open-label Clinical Study on the Prevention of Premature Ovarian Failure After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT05667428]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-01Not yet recruiting
Sunitinib, Hormonal Ablation and External Beam Radiation Therapy for High-Risk and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT00631527]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Antigonadotropin-Leuprolide in Alzheimer's Disease Drug INvestigation (ALADDIN) VP 104 Study [NCT00076440]Phase 290 participants Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Effect of Short Term Ovarian Suppression on Androgen Overproduction in Overweight Girls With Androgen Excess (CBS007) [NCT01422096]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-01Withdrawn(stopped due to The study team decided not to pursue this study.)
Neoadjuvant Hormonal Ablation, Imatinib Mesylate and Docetaxel Followed by Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT00500110]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
The Central Nervous System Effects of Pharmacologically Induced Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism With and Without Estrogen and Progesterone Replacement [NCT00001322]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-06-09Completed
A Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Dasatinib Plus LHRH Analogue Therapy in High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT00860158]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual; closed by funder)
A Phase I/II Trial of Post-Prostatectomy Radiation Therapy, Hormonal Therapy and Concurrent Docetaxel for High Risk Pathologic T2-T3NO (Tumor-3, Node-0) Prostate Cancer [NCT00669162]Phase 1/Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
A 36 Month, Multi-Center, Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Safety of Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg and 30 mg Formulations in Children With Central Precocious Puberty [NCT00667446]Phase 372 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of Degarelix Given Intermittently vs Continuous Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Lupron or Degarelix in Patients With Prostate Cancer With Prior Treatment Failure After Loca [NCT00928434]Phase 3409 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
The Impact of Continuous Versus Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Bone Mineral Density Change in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04248621]Phase 4164 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-23Recruiting
A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Use of hCG or GnRH Agonist to Trigger Final Oocyte Maturation in High Responders Undergoing in-Vitro Fertilization Treatment [NCT00349258]Phase 466 participants Interventional2004-08-31Completed
OMPCa-Shanghai: An Open-label, Randomized Prospective Phase II Trial of Androgen Deprivation Therapy or Androgen Deprivation Therapy Plus Definitive Treatment (Radiation or Surgery) of the Primary Tumor in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT02742675]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Active, not recruiting
Treatment of Uterine Fibroids With Magnetic Resonance Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound [NCT02736435]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-18Withdrawn(stopped due to Lengthy delays and inadequate support to proceed.)
An Exploratory, Open Label, Single-arm Study to Evaluate the Effect of Eligard® 6-month on Biomarkers of Disease in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT01933022]Phase 41 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Termination due to high current screen rate failure and unreliable PSA mRNA assay.)
Understanding Experimentally Induced Hot Flushes and Their Impact on Sleep and Mood [NCT00455689]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-28Completed
Phase Ib Study of Limited Androgen Ablation and Two Dose Levels of Temsirolimus (NSC#683864) in Patients With Prostate Cancer Who Have a Biochemical Relapse After Prostatectomy and/or Radiotherapy [NCT00512668]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Terminated
An Open-Label, Multi-Centre, Extension Study, Evaluating the Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Degarelix One-Month Dosing Regimen in Patients With Prostate Cancer Requiring Androgen Ablation Therapy [NCT00451958]Phase 3386 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Phase II Study of GnRH Analogue for Ovarian Function Preservation in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients [NCT00429494]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Androgen Receptor (AR) Inhibition by Darolutamide in Combination With Leuprolide Acetate and Exemestane in Recurrent Adult-Type Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumor [NCT06169124]Phase 237 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-15Not yet recruiting
Study of the Modulatory Activity of an LHRH-Agonist (Leuprolide) on Melanoma Peptide Vaccines as Adjuvant Therapy in Melanoma Patients [NCT00254397]Phase 298 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
BASH-PC: Bariatric Arterial Embolization for Men Starting Hormones for Prostate Cancer [NCT04331717]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-16Withdrawn(stopped due to accrual on hold)
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Phase III Trial Comparing Immediate Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy (ELIGARD®- Leuprolide Acetate) in Combination With TAXOTERE® (Docetaxel) Administered Every Three Weeks Versus Hormonal Therapy Alone Versus Deferred Ther [NCT00283062]Phase 3228 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
Leuprolide Acetate to Enhance Immune Function Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00275262]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Terminated
A Randomised Trial Investigating the Effect on Biochemical (PSA) Control and Survival of Different Durations of Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation in Association With Definitive Radiation Treatment for Localised Carcinoma of the Prostate. [NCT00193856]Phase 31,071 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
A Post-Marketing Observational Study to Document Treatment Patterns and to Evaluate Leuprolide and Alternative Therapeutic Approaches to the Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT01081873]2,717 participants (Actual)Observational2004-06-30Completed
An Evolutionary Double Bind Phase II Neoadjuvant Study of Abiraterone Acetate, Leuprolide Acetate, and Belzutifan in Men With Regional Prostate Cancer Eligible for Prostatectomy [NCT05574712]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
[NCT00004311]Phase 20 participants Interventional1989-07-31Completed
An Open Label, Randomized, Phase II Trial of Metabolic Complications in Patients Treated With Enzalutamide vs Standard ADT for the Treatment of Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT02278185]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-11Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Phase II Trial of Brief Androgen-Ablation Combined With Cell-based CG1940/CG8711 Immunotherapy For Prostate Cancer in Patients With Non-Metastatic, Biochemically Relapsed Prostate Cancer [NCT00771017]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Withdrawn
A reAl-World Evidence Study Using Alberta Population Based Data to Describe Treatment Patterns for Metastatic castRation sENsitivE proState Cancer patientS (AWARENESS) [NCT05149131]400 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-01-17Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Talazoparib With Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Abiraterone in Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT04734730]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-04Recruiting
Multicentric Phase II Trial of Salvage Radiotherapy Combined With Hormonotherapy in Oligometastatic Pelvic Node Relapses of Prostate Cancer (OLIGOPELVIS / GETUG P07) [NCT02274779]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-08-20Active, not recruiting
Sleep, Metabolic, and Cardiovascular Dysfunction in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome [NCT00203996]Phase 437 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Did not meet target patient accrual goals)
Phase 2 Response Evaluation of Finite Systemic Therapy With Advanced Androgen Signaling Inhibition and Radiation Therapy for Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer (RESTART) [NCT04585932]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-24Withdrawn(stopped due to At the request of the ad interim Department Chairman due to PI is no longer at institution.)
A Randomized, Open-Label, Neoadjuvant Prostate Cancer Trial of Abiraterone Acetate Plus LHRHa Versus LHRHa Alone [NCT01088529]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
An Open Label Randomized Phase 2 Study To Evaluate The Activity, Tolerability, And Toxicity Of Combined Neoadjuvant Anti-angiogenesis and Androgen Ablation Therapy in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy [NCT00244920]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor withdrew drug.)
A Phase III Confirmatory Study of KLH-2109 in Uterine Fibroids Patient With Menorrhagia [NCT05440383]Phase 3264 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-11Active, not recruiting
Parallel Phase III Randomized Trials of Genomic-Risk Stratified Unfavorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: De-Intensification and Intensification Clinical Trial Evaluation (GUIDANCE) [NCT05050084]Phase 32,050 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-03Recruiting
Parallel Phase III Randomized Trials for High Risk Prostate Cancer Evaluating De-Intensification for Lower Genomic Risk and Intensification of Concurrent Therapy for Higher Genomic Risk With Radiation (PREDICT-RT*) [NCT04513717]Phase 32,478 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-15Recruiting
Strength, Aging, and Memory in Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Study of the Effects of Androgen Deprivation on Neurocognition and Frailty [NCT04852224]20 participants (Actual)Observational2021-10-01Completed
Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy Plus Docetaxel Followed by Radical Prostatectomy for Men With Proven or Suspected Node-positive Prostate Cancer [NCT01076335]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
A Phase 2 Study of Neoadjuvant PARP Inhibition Followed by Radical Prostatectomy in Patients With Unfavorable Intermediate-Risk or High-Risk Prostate Cancer With BRCA1/2 Gene Alterations (NePtune) [NCT05498272]Phase 232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-01Recruiting
Phase III Study of Local or Systemic Therapy INtensification DIrected by PET in Prostate CAncer Patients With Post-ProstaTEctomy Biochemical Recurrence (INDICATE) [NCT04423211]Phase 3804 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-08Recruiting
Lucrin® Depot Efficacy and Safety Monitoring Study in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. International, Multicenter Post-marketing Observational Study. [NCT01078545]729 participants (Actual)Observational2008-09-30Completed
A Phase II Study of NEOADjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor and Pertuzumab/Trastuzumab (NEOADAPT) [NCT02689921]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Randomized Study of Enzalutamide+Leuprolide Versus Enzalutamide+Leuprolide+Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone as Neoadjuvant Therapy for HIgh-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Prostatectomy [NCT02268175]Phase 275 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
[NCT02778919]Phase 20 participants Interventional2016-05-09Completed
A Novel Approach to Endometrial Preparation in Recipients of Donor Cycles [NCT01424618]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-01-31Recruiting
Neoadjuvant Estradiol or Androgen Deprivation in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT00167648]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
BYLieve: A Phase II, Multicenter, Open-label, Three-cohort, Non- Comparative Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Alpelisib Plus Fulvestrant or Letrozole in Patients With PIK3CA Mutant, Hormone Receptor (HR) Positive, HER2-negative Advanced Breast C [NCT03056755]Phase 2383 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-14Active, not recruiting
Leuprolide Acetate Suppresses Pedophilic Urges and Arousability [NCT00220350]Phase 2/Phase 310 participants Interventional2001-10-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase IIIb Randomized Study of Intermittent Versus Continuous Androgen Deprivation Therapy Using ELIGARD 22.5 mg 3-month Depot in Subjects With Relapsing and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Who Are Responsive to Such Therapy [NCT00378690]Phase 3706 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
The ELDORADO (Eligard®, Docetaxel and Radiotherapy) Study: A Phase II Study of Chemo - Hormonal Therapy and Radiation in High Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT00452556]Phase 286 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-05-31Active, not recruiting
Comparative Controlled Clinical Trial of Two Pharmacological Treatments of Pedophilia [NCT00601276]Phase 348 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-12-31Terminated
CASPAR - A Phase III Trial of Enzalutamide and Rucaparib as a Novel Therapy in First-Line Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT04455750]Phase 361 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-19Active, not recruiting
The Impact of Estrogen Status on the Biological Function of Brown Adipose Tissue in Women Measured Using Quantitative PET/CT [NCT02927392]72 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-01Completed
[NCT00505817]Phase 40 participants InterventionalCompleted
Multi-site Study of Comprehensive Treatment for Children Precocious Puberty [NCT02920515]Phase 4740 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
Generation of Positive Biological Samples to Leuprolide Acetate for Doping Control [NCT02920359]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-17Completed
A Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of DWJ108J in Patients With Central Precocious Puberty : A Single-arm, Open-label, Multi-center, Prospective Study [NCT06025409]Phase 379 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-01Recruiting
Veterans Affairs Seamless Phase II/III Randomized Trial of STAndard Systemic theRapy With or Without PET-directed Local Therapy for OligoRecurrenT Prostate Cancer (VA STARPORT) [NCT04787744]Phase 2/Phase 3464 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-01Recruiting
A Phase IIIb Study to Characterize the Effectiveness and Safety of ADJUVANT Ribociclib in Broad Real-World patIent Populations in Stage II anD Stage III HR+/HER2- Early Breast canceR (ADJUVANT WIDER) [NCT05827081]Phase 32,500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-16Not yet recruiting
PROTOCOL FOR THE SCOTTISH PREMENOPAUSAL CHEMO-ENDOCRINE TRIAL [NCT00002580]Phase 31,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1993-06-30Completed
[NCT00004344]4 participants Observational1997-01-31Completed
PROtecting Ovaries and Fertility During Chemotherapy - The PROOF Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRHa) for Fertility Preservation in Oncology Patients [NCT00380406]Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
A Phase III Prospective Randomized Trial of Dose-Escalated Radiotherapy With or Without Short-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT00936390]Phase 31,538 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 2 Trial Examining the Sequencing of Sipuleucel-T and Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Men With Non-metastatic Prostate Cancer and a Rising Serum Prostate Specific Antigen After Primary Therapy [NCT01431391]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Oral Contraceptives Versus Depot-Leuprolide Taken After Surgery for Endometriosis-Associated Pelvic Pain [NCT00229996]Phase 3194 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF ENDORECTAL MRI IN PREDICTING OUTCOME AFTER COMBINED RADIATION AND ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION FOR PROSTATE CANCER: A PROSPECTIVE PHASE II STUDY [NCT00002889]Phase 2180 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-05-31Completed
Phase II, Randomized, Open-label, International, Multicenter Study to Compare Efficacy of Standard Chemotherapy vs. Letrozole Plus Abemaciclib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in HR-positive/HER2-negative High/Intermediate Risk Breast Cancer Patients [NCT04293393]Phase 2200 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-02Active, not recruiting
Phase I Trial of Concurrent Taxotere With Radiation Therapy and Hormonal Therapy For Clinically Localized High Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT00099086]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-16Active, not recruiting
A Phase III Trial of Short Term Androgen Deprivation With Pelvic Lymph Node or Prostate Bed Only Radiotherapy (SPPORT) in Prostate Cancer Patients With a Rising PSA After Radical Prostatectomy [NCT00567580]Phase 31,792 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Active, not recruiting
Analysis of Genetic and Environmental Parameters Influencing Growth Rate of Precocious Puberty Children [NCT00438217]Phase 4100 participants InterventionalRecruiting
Treatment of Endometriosis With Norethindrone Acetate ( NA) VS. Gonadotropin- Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist (Lupron Depot 11.25 mg) [NCT00458458]Phase 3112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-08-31Active, not recruiting
RecoverPC: A Phase 2 Study of RElugolix Versus GnRH Agonist Quality of Life (QOL) and Testosterone reCOVERy in Men With Prostate Cancer [NCT05765500]Phase 2110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-31Not yet recruiting
Phase II Pilot of Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy With Femara® (Letrozole) and Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Estrogen Receptor Positive Women With Stage IV Carcinoma of the Breast [NCT00498901]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Terminated
Oral Androgens in Man-3: Pharmacokinetics of Oral Testosterone With Concomitant Inhibition of 5α-Reductase by Dutasteride Short Title: ORAL T-3 [NCT00161421]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Phase I Trial for the Evaluation of the Two-way Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PD) Interaction of Gender Affirming Exogenous Estrogen (With Testosterone Suppression) on TDF/FTC PrEP in Transgender Women (TGW) [NCT04760691]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-01Recruiting
Extended Endocrine Therapy for Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer [NCT00903162]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of Androgen Deprivation Combined With IMC-A12 Versus Androgen Deprivation Alone for Patients With New Hormone Sensitive Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT01120236]Phase 2211 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
A 12 Month Open Label Study of Serum Testosterone Recovery and PSA After Neo-Adjuvant Treatment With Eligard(TM) 22.5mg Used With Radiation Therapy in Patients With Early Prostate Cancer [NCT01136226]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
A Randomized Prospective Trial of Dual Trigger Ovulation in Oocyte Donors [NCT01443546]Phase 426 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Unable to complete accrual)
A Six-Month, Open-Label, Crossover Study Of the Maintenance Of Serum Testosterone And PSA Suppression After Switching Between Lupron 22.5 Mg And Eligard 22.5 Mg Or Zoladex 10.8 Mg And Eligard 22.5 Mg In Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT00220194]Phase 4100 participants Interventional2003-04-30Completed
Real World Evidence Study on Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patient Characteristics, Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in the Pirkanmaa Hospital District in Finland [NCT05701007]1 participants (Actual)Observational2023-02-13Completed
Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients With High-Risk, Hormone Receptor-Positive and HER2/Neu Negative Breast Cancer [NCT01674140]Phase 31,939 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-12Active, not recruiting
Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Adenomyosis (Internal Endometriosis) According to Stimulation Protocol in Relation to Immunological and Endometrial Features: a Prospective, Randomized Study [NCT05937490]Phase 4500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-27Recruiting
A Phase 2 Open-Label, Randomized, Multi-center Study of Neoadjuvant Abiraterone Acetate (CB7630) Plus Leuprolide Acetate and Prednisone Versus Leuprolide Acetate Alone in Men With Localized High Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT00924469]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Ultralong Administration of GnRH-a Before in Vitro Fertilization Improves Fertilization Rate But Not Pregnancy Rate in Women With Endometriosis. A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial. [NCT01269125]180 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
Regulation of Cortisol Metabolism and Fat Patterning [NCT00694733]140 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Active, not recruiting
Exploratory Study of Molecular Profile-Associated Evidence Guided Precision Therapy for Salivary Gland Cancer [NCT05087706]182 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2021-07-30Recruiting
Phase II, Open-label, Single-center Study Evaluating Safety and Activity of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Followed by Chemoimmunotherapy for Newly Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC) [NCT03951831]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-16Active, not recruiting
Non-comparative, Opened Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of ELIGARD 22.5mg in the Treatment of Subjects With Prostate Cancer [NCT01511874]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
A Phase I Study Of SU5416 With Androgen Ablation And Radiation In Patients With Intermediate and Advanced Stage Prostate Cancer [NCT00026377]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
A Pilot Study of Pembrolizumab and Exemestane/ Leuprolide in Premenopausal Hormone Receptor Positive/ HER2 Negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT02990845]Phase 1/Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-15Terminated(stopped due to The enrolment became difficult, as most of the premenopausal women decided to receive ovarian ablation for health insurance reimbursement for CDK4/6 inhibitor for the first-line treatment, making them ineligible for joining the study.)
Antigonadotropin-Leuprolide in Alzheimer's Disease Drug INvestigation (ALADDIN) [NCT00063310]Phase 290 participants Interventional2003-03-31Completed
[NCT00076531]Phase 30 participants Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of a New Leuprolide Acetate 3.75 mg Depot Formulation, GP-Pharm S.A., When Given as Palliative Treatment to Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT00128531]Phase 3120 participants Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Phase 1, Open Label, Non-Randomized, Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety of CP-675,206 in Combination With Neoadjuvant Androgen Ablation and a Phase 2, Open Label, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of CP-675,206 in Combination With Neoa [NCT00075192]Phase 1/Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
A Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Androgen Suppression and Elective Pelvic Nodal Irradiation Followed by High Dose 3-D Conformal Boost Versus Androgen Suppression and Elective Pelvic Nodal Irradiation Followed by 125-Iodine Brachytherapy Implant Boos [NCT00175396]Phase 3400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-05-31Active, not recruiting
Pharmacokinetic, Safety and Efficacy Study of a Six-Month Depot Formulation of Leuprolide in Subjects With Prostatic Carcinoma [NCT00056654]164 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
An Open-Labeled, Singled-Arm Study of the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Leuprolide Mesylate for Injectable Suspension (LMIS 50 mg) in Subjects With Advanced Prostate Carcinoma [NCT02234115]Phase 3137 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Phase IV, Non-interventional, Prospective, Open Label, Non Comparative Real Life Data Collection of Depo-Eligard® 7.5 mg, 22.5 mg and 45 mg in Male Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT01793077]259 participants (Actual)Observational2011-12-31Completed
A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Two 6-Month Leuprolide Formulations, in Subjects With Prostatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT00626431]Phase 3310 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Randomized Trial of Concomitant Hypofractionated IMRT Boost Versus Conventional Fractionated IMRT Boost for Localized High Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT04239599]178 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Active, not recruiting
Do Endometrial Implantation Markers Predict in Vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Cycle Outcomes in Endometriosis Patients Pretreated With Leuprolide Acetate in Depot Suspension? [NCT00621179]Phase 437 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
A Phase III, Randomised, Parallel Group, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active Comparator-controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of PGL4001 vs GnRH-agonist for Pre-operative Ttt of Symptomatic Uterine Myomas [NCT00740831]Phase 3301 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Bipolar Androgen-based Therapy for Men With Androgen Ablation NaÃ-ve Recurrent Prostate Cancer [NCT01750398]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Phase 2 Study of Enzalutamide and GnRH Agonist Before, During and After Radiation Therapy in Treatment of Patients With High-risk Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT02064582]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Definitive Radiotherapy With Leuprolide and Enzalutamide in High Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT02508636]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-22Terminated(stopped due to Low Accrual)
Short Versus Long-term Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined With Salvage Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer Patients With Biochemical Recurrence After Prostatectomy: a Multicentre Phase III Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT05781217]Phase 3534 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-14Recruiting
20-347 NCT Number Title A Single Arm Phase II Study of ADjuvant Endocrine Therapy, Pertuzumab, and Trastuzumab for Patients With Anatomic Stage I Hormone Receptor-positive, HER2-positive Breast Cancer (ADEPT) [NCT04569747]Phase 2375 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-11Recruiting
A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label Comparison of Pre-surgical Combination of Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab With Concurrent Taxane Chemotherapy or Endocrine Therapy Given for Twelve Weeks With a Quality of Life Assessment of Trastuzumab, Pertu [NCT03272477]Phase 2257 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-05Active, not recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Weekly Intravenous Estramustine Phosphate in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT00003394]Phase 1/Phase 218 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-04-30Completed
Study of Leuprolide in Adults With Hypogonadotropism [NCT00004438]45 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-09-30Completed
Impact of Experimentally Induced Hot Flashes on Sleep and Mood Disturbance [NCT01116401]Phase 429 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-03Completed
The Phase 4 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Luphere Depot Inj. 3.75mg(Leuprolide Acetate 3.75mg) in Patients With Precocious Puberty; A Single, Open, Multi-center, Prospective Study [NCT01634321]Phase 463 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
Effect of GnRH Antagonist Protocol vs Agonist Long Protocol During Controlled Hyperstimulation (COH)for Assisted Reproduction on IVF Outcome, Peak Estradiol Level, and Duration of Stimulation. [NCT01669291]43 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
An Open-label Dose-finding Study to Evaluate the Pharmacodynamic (PD) Profiles and Efficacy of Different Dosing Regimens of Leuprolide Oral Tablets (Ovarest®) in Women With Endometriosis [NCT05096065]Phase 216 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-18Recruiting
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Assessor-Blind, Controlled Trial Comparing the Occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACEs) in Patients With Prostate Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Receiving Degarelix (Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Rec [NCT02663908]Phase 3545 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-19Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment rate; a lower than anticipated observed cardiovascular event rate. The Sponsor decision to stop the trial was not based on any safety concerns or any knowledge of the results, or influenced by issues imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.)
Ulipristal Acetate Versus GnRH Analogue for Myometrial Preservation in Patients With Submucosal Uterine Leiomyoma G2 [NCT02357563]Phase 4110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-02-28Recruiting
Gonadal Steroid Regulation of the Natriuretic Peptide System [NCT01763541]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Withdrawn
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2 Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Dose-Response Relationship of ASP1707 in Subjects With Endometriosis Associated Pelvic Pain for 12 Weeks, Followed by a 12-Week Double-blind Extension Withou [NCT01767090]Phase 2912 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-04Completed
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group, Comparative Study of TAP-144-SR (3M) to Evaluate Hormone Dynamics, Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Efficacy of TAP-144-SR (6M) 22.5 mg Subcutaneous Injection for 48 Weeks in Prostate Cancer Pat [NCT01546623]Phase 3160 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Single-dosing, 2x2 Crossover Phase 1 Study to Compare the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of PT105 With PT105R in Healthy Postmenopausal Female Volunteers [NCT04783636]Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-11Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of a New Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg Depot Formulation in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer [NCT01415960]Phase 3163 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Identification of the Menstrual Cycle-Associated Factors That Modulate Circulating Lipid Levels in Premenopausal Women [NCT01546454]5 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Feasibility of Cytoreductive Prostatectomy in Men Newly Diagnosed With Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT02458716]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-06Completed
Advantages of Ulipristal Acetate for the Preoperative Treatment of Hypoechoic Cellular Leiomyomas [NCT02361905]Phase 442 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-02-28Recruiting
An Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of The Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Leuprolide Mesylate Injectable Suspension (LMIS 25 mg) in Subjects With Prostate Cancer [NCT03261999]Phase 3144 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-26Completed
Salvage Therapeutic Radiation With Enzalutamide and ADT in Men With Recurrent Prostate Cancer (STREAM) [NCT02057939]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Phase I/II Study of Sorafenib Concurrent With Androgen Deprivation and Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Intermediate- and High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT00924807]Phase 1/Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor closed the trial)
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-Label, Two-Part Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Leuprolide Acetate 45 mg 6-Month Depot Formulation in Children With Central Precocious Puberty (CPP) [NCT03695237]Phase 345 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-24Completed
THE EFFICACY OF PREOPERATIVE USAGE OF GONADOTROPINE-RELEASING HORMONE AGONIST IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY DUE TO UTERIN FIBROIDS [NCT04192812]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-30Not yet recruiting
ARN-509+Abiraterone Acetate+Leuprolide With Stereotactic, Ultra-Hypofractionated Radiation (AASUR) in Very High Risk Prostate Cancer: A Single Arm, Phase II Study [NCT02772588]Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Active, not recruiting
Phase III Randomised Trial to Evaluate the Benefit of Adjuvant Hormonal Treatment With Leuprorelin Acetate (Eligard® 45 mg) for 24 Months After Radical Prostatectomy in Patients With High Risk of Recurrence. [NCT01442246]Phase 3700 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-07-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With or Without Palbociclib in RB-Positive Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT02059213]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Prediction of the PRONOUNCE Prostate Cancer Trial in Healthcare Claims Data [NCT04897958]14,417 participants (Actual)Observational2019-09-21Completed
A Phase 2 Multicohort Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Docetaxel and Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients With DNA Damage Repair Defects or Inflamed Tumors [NCT04126070]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-11Recruiting
Multi-institutional Study to Increase Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) Rate With Personalized Neoadjuvant Strategy in ER Positive and HER2 Negative Breast Cancer Patients for Whom BCS is Not Feasible [NCT03900637]Phase 2122 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-08Active, not recruiting
DETECT V / CHEVENDO A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study to Compare Chemo- Versus Endocrine Therapy in Combination With Dual HER2-targeted Therapy of Herceptin® (Trastuzumab) and Perjeta® (Pertuzumab) Plus Kisqali® (Ribociclib) in Patients With HER2 [NCT02344472]Phase 3270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Recruiting
A Phase II, Open Label, Active Control, Multi-National, Multi-Centre, Randomized, Parallel Group Study Assessing Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Efficacy and Safety of CAM2032 (Leuprolide Acetate FluidCrystal® Injection Depot Once Monthly) After Repea [NCT02212197]Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Oligo-recurrent Prostate Cancer in Addition to radioTherapy [NCT04302454]Phase 3280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-19Recruiting
Phase II Trial of Maximal Androgen Deprivation Followed by Conformal External Beam Radiotherapy With Continued Androgen Deprivation for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT00003124]Phase 2105 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-05-31Completed
Systemic and Tumor-Directed Therapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT03298087]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-01Active, not recruiting
Study of Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonist Test Using Leuprolide Acetate in Patients With Gonadotropin Deficiency [NCT00004426]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1994-08-31Completed
Insulin Resistance and Testosterone in Non-Diabetic Postmenopausal Women [NCT00123110]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Randomized Phase II Screening Trial of Enzalutamide/MDV-3100 and LHRH Analogue vs Combined Androgen Deprivation (LHRH Analogue + Bicalutamide) in Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT02058706]Phase 271 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of a New Leuprolide Acetate 17 mg Depot Formulation, GP-Pharm S.A., When Given as Palliative Treatment to Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT00630799]Phase 320 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Terminated
A Phase II, Multicenter, Long-term Extension Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of TAK-385 (10, 20, and 40 mg) Following Oral Administration for 12 Weeks or More in the Treatment of Endometriosis [NCT01452685]Phase 2397 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-385 10, 20, and 40 mg (p.o.) in the Treatment of Endometriosis [NCT01458301]Phase 2487 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
A Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Endocrine Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone as the Neoadjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of ER-positive, HER2-negative Breast Cancer (IIa-IIIc) [NCT02980965]Phase 3249 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Phase II Study Of Neo-Adjuvant Paclitaxel, Estramustine And Carboplatin (TEC) Plus Androgen Ablation Prior To Radiation Therapy In Patients With Poor Prognosis Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT00016913]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-05-31Completed
A Prospective Study of Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS) in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer Who Have Biochemical Relapse After Radiation Therapy or Radical Prostatectomy [NCT00223665]Phase 2102 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-01-08Completed
A Multidisciplinary Team-Based Approach to Mitigate the Impact of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Phase 2 [NCT02168062]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-16Terminated(stopped due to Funding)
Analysis of Body Mass Index in Central Precocious Puberty(CPP) Patients Treated With Leuprolide Acetate [NCT02974270]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-06-30Recruiting
A GnRH Agonist IN Pre-menopausal Women STudy to Treat Severe Polycystic Liver Disease [NCT05478083]Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-01Recruiting
Role of Suppression of Endometriosis With Progestins Before IVF-ET: a Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04500743]134 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-01Completed
Adjuvant Ovarian Suppression Plus Aromatase Inhibitor or Tamoxifen for Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer in Women Younger Than 35: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02914158]Phase 3680 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-03-30Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Definitive Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Men With Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT02716974]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Completed
Bevacizumab Plus Paclitaxel Optimization Study With Interventional Maintenance Endocrine Therapy in Advanced or Metastatic ER-positive HER2-negative Breast Cancer -BOOSTER Trial, a Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study- [NCT01989780]Phase 2160 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
A Randomized Phase III Study of Neo-Adjuvant Docetaxel and Androgen Deprivation Prior to Radical Prostatectomy Versus Immediate Radical Prostatectomy in Patients With High-Risk, Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT00430183]Phase 3788 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-08Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Concurrent Weekly Docetaxel (Taxotere®), Androgen Ablation, and Adaptive External Beam Radiotherapy for Localized High-Risk Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT00225420]Phase 1/Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
GnRH-a for Ovarian Protection During CYC Therapy for Rheumatic Diseases [NCT01257802]Phase 314 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Terminated
A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Oral GnRH Antagonist TAK-385, Together With a Leuprorelin Observational Cohort, in Patients With Prostate Cancer [NCT02083185]Phase 2136 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-26Completed
UKCCCR RANDOMISED TRIAL OF ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY AND CHEMOTHERAPY IN WOMEN WITH EARLY BREAST CANCER, THE ADJUVANT BREAST CANCER (ABC) TRIAL [NCT00002582]Phase 36,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1993-06-30Completed
An Open Label, Randomized, Phase III Study, Evaluating the Efficacy of a Combination of Apalutamide With Radiotherapy and LHRH Agonist in High-risk Postprostatectomy Biochemically Relapsed Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT04181203]Phase 3490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-09Recruiting
[NCT00004436]30 participants Interventional1993-07-31Completed
"Leuprorelin Acetate SR 11.25 mg Injection Kit Specified Drug-use Survey Long-term Use Survey in Prostate Cancer Patients (96 Weeks)" [NCT02167893]11,288 participants (Actual)Observational2005-10-31Completed
Phase II Study of Antineoplastons A10 and AS2-1 Capsules With Total Androgen Blockade in Patients With Stage III or IV Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT00003517]Phase 20 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn
[NCT00004771]Phase 240 participants Interventional1992-10-31Completed
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase III Study to Assess the Impact of Transient Androgenic Deprivation With Enantone LP 11.25 Mg (Leuprorelin) on the Histological Progression of Indolent Prostate Cancer [NCT02085252]Phase 3116 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-03Completed
A Prospective Comparison of Transcriptional Profiling of Luteal Phase Endometrial Biopsies After Induction of Oocyte Maturation With a Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist or Human Chorionic Gonadotropins (hCG) [NCT01606709]Phase 47 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Difficult to recruit patients)
Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Total Androgen Blockade Versus Total Androgen Blockade Plus Pelvic Irradiation in Clinical Stage T3-4, N0, M0 Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT00002633]Phase 3361 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-02-08Completed
An Open-label, Single Arm, Multicenter Study on the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Leuprolide Acetate 45 mg for Injectable Suspension Controlled Release in Subjects With Central (Gonadotropin-Dependent) Precocious Puberty [NCT02452931]Phase 364 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study Of Bone-Targeted Therapy In Advanced Androgen-Dependent Prostate Cancer [NCT00081159]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
An Open Label, Randomized, Single Dose, Parallel-group, Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Safety Following Subcutaneous Administration of DWJ108J in Patients With Prostate Cancer [NCT03029533]Phase 144 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-02-28Not yet recruiting
A Multi-Center Trial of Androgen Suppression With Abiraterone aCetate, LEuprolide, PARP Inhibition and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (ASCLEPIuS): A Phase I/2 Trial in High Risk and Node Positive Prostate Cancer [NCT04194554]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-06Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Definitive Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Men With Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer After Prostatectomy [NCT03043807]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-22Completed
A Phase 2 Study of Docetaxel Plus Apalutamide in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Post Abiraterone Acetate [NCT03093272]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-23Terminated(stopped due to Safety concerns)
A Randomized Phase Ib/II Study of Preoperative GDC-0449 and Androgen Ablation Compared to Androgen Ablation Alone Followed by Radical Prostatectomy for Select Patients With Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT01163084]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-09Terminated
[NCT01546649]Phase 3167 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy Followed by Salvage Surgery for High Risk PSA Failure With Biopsy Proven Local Recurrence After Initial Definitive Radiotherapy [NCT01531205]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Terminated(stopped due to low accrual)
A Randomized, Open-label, Phase 2 Study Of Mdv3100 As A Neoadjuvant Therapy For Patients Undergoing Prostatectomy For Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT01547299]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Ovarian Hormones, Reward Response, and Binge Eating in Bulimia Nervosa: An Experimental Design [NCT04225221]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-24Completed
PHASE III TRIAL OF ORCHIECTOMY/LHRH ANALOG + FLUTAMIDE + SURAMIN + HYDROCORTISONE VS ORCHIECTOMY/LHRH ANALOG + FLUTAMIDE IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER [NCT00002881]Phase 30 participants Interventional1996-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel- Group, Multi-center Phase IIb Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Different Dose Combinations of an Aromatase Inhibitor and a Progestin in an Intravaginal Ring Versus Placebo and Leuprorelin / Leu [NCT02203331]Phase 2319 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-16Completed
Phase III Randomized Trial of Standard Systemic Therapy (SST) Versus Standard Systemic Therapy Plus Definitive Treatment (Surgery or Radiation) of the Primary Tumor in Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT03678025]Phase 31,273 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-24Recruiting
A Phase III Double Blinded Study of Early Intervention After RADICAl ProstaTEctomy With Androgen Deprivation Therapy With or Without Darolutamide vs. Placebo in Men at Highest Risk of Prostate Cancer Metastasis by Genomic Stratification (ERADICATE) [NCT04484818]Phase 327 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-01Active, not recruiting
Phase II, Open Label, Dose Finding Study of the Effect of GTx-758 on Total and Free Testosterone Levels in Men With Prostate Cancer Compared to a Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone Agonist [NCT01326312]Phase 2159 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Terminated(stopped due to FDA Clinical Hold)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multi-Center, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 and 30 mg Formulations in Children With Central Precocious Puberty [NCT00635817]Phase 384 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Randomized Crossover Trial to Assess the Tolerability of GnRH Analogue Administration in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT01161563]Phase 4118 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
A Randomised Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant TAK-700 and Leuprorelin Acetate Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery Alone in Intermediate and High Risk Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT03211052]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-18Terminated(stopped due to IMP no longer available)
Phase 2 Trial Pembrolizumab or Pembrolizumab in Combination With Intratumoral SD-101 Therapy in Patients With Hormone-Naïve Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Receiving Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy [NCT03007732]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-17Active, not recruiting
"Leuplin SR 11.25 mg Injection Kit Specified Drug-use Survey: QOL Survey in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients" [NCT02134977]2,816 participants (Actual)Observational2011-09-30Completed
Phase II Randomized Study Of Neoadjuvant And Adjuvant Abiraterone Acetate + Apalutamide For Intermediate-High Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Prostatectomy [NCT02903368]Phase 2118 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-19Active, not recruiting
Randomized Trial of External Beam Radiation With or Without Short-Course Hormonal Therapy in Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT00388804]Phase 339 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual.)
A Phase II Study of Ipilimumab PLUS Androgen Depravation Therapy in Castrate Sensitive Prostate Carcinoma [NCT01377389]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-17Terminated(stopped due to Due to adverse events)
A Neoadjuvant Phase IIa Study of Ipilimumab {Formerly Known as MDX-010 (BMS-734016)} Plus Hormone Ablation in Men With Prostate Cancer Followed by Radical Prostatectomy. [NCT01194271]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Open, Prospective Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Leuprorelin Acetate DPS (Leuplin DPS) Treatment Quarterly in Patients With Central Precocious Puberty [NCT03316482]Phase 458 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-11Completed
STEEL: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Salvage Radiotherapy With Standard vs Enhanced Androgen Deprivation Therapy (With Enzalutamide) in Patients With Post-Prostatectomy PSA Recurrences With Aggressive Disease Features [NCT03809000]Phase 2188 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-15Active, not recruiting
PRospective, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Switching Treatments of Prostate Cancer Patients, Initially on Use of Monthly or Quarterly Goserelin Acetate (Zoladex®), to Semiannually Leuprorelin Acetate (Eligard®) [NCT05304169]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-14Completed
Phase Ib Trial of Enzalutamide in Combination With Radiation Therapy and LHRH Agonist Therapy in the Management of Intermediate and High-Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT02023463]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-02Active, not recruiting
The Relation of GnRH Treatment to QTc Interval in Transgender Female Youth: A Time Series Study [NCT03078829]3 participants (Actual)Observational2017-05-01Terminated(stopped due to investigator has left UCSF)
The Treatment of Menstrually-Related Mood Disorders With the Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist, Depot Leuprolide Acetate (Lupron) [NCT00001259]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional1992-08-11Completed
[NCT00004763]Phase 245 participants Interventional1993-01-31Completed
A Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Intermittent Versus Continuous Androgen Suppression for Patients With Prostate-Specific-Antigen Progression in the Clinical Absence of Distant Metastases Following Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer [NCT00003653]Phase 31,386 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-01-05Completed
Mechanism and Predictors of Cardiotoxicity After Prostate Cancer Treatment: A Parallel Cohort and Randomized Trial Comparing Radiation Alone, Radiation Plus Leuprolide, and Radiation Plus Relugolix [NCT05320406]Phase 494 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-06Recruiting
A Randomized, Single-blinded, Parallel Design Phase I Clinical Trial to Investigate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of CKD-841 A-1, CKD-841 D or Leuplin Inj. After Subcutaneous Injection in Postmenopausal Female [NCT04840745]Phase 132 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-30Not yet recruiting
Whole-Pelvic Radiotherapy With a Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Boost and Long-Term Androgen Deprivation for Unfavorable-Intermediate and High Risk Localized Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate. [NCT02064036]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-06Completed
Bioenergetic and Metabolic Consequences of the Loss of Ovarian Function in Women [NCT01712230]47 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
Maximal Stimulation and Delayed Fertilization for Diminished Ovarian Reserve: a Randomized Pilot Study [NCT01921166]Phase 423 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Neurophysiology of Postpartum Depression in an Experimental Model of Pregnancy and Parturition [NCT01762943]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
A Multi-institutional Phase I and Biomarker Study of Everolimus Added to Combined Hormonal and Radiation Therapy for High Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT01642732]Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of accrual and funding expires in June, 2014.)
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral TAK-385 40 mg Compared With Leuprorelin in the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids [NCT02655237]Phase 3281 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-05Completed
QoL and Treatment Compliance for Pre-menopausal Patients With HR+ Breast Cancer Using GnRHa as Ovarian Function Suppression(OFS) Treatment in the Chinese Population: a Real-world Observational Investigation [NCT05122377]500 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-11-30Not yet recruiting
Docetaxel With Rapid Hormonal Cycling as a Treatment for Patients With Prostate Cancer [NCT00587431]Phase 2102 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
Characterizing the Neural Substrates of Irritability in Women: an Experimental Neuroendocrine Model [NCT04051320]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-02Completed
A Phase II Immunotherapeutic Trial: Combination Androgen Ablative Therapy and CTLA-4 Blockade as a Treatment for Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT00170157]Phase 2112 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
Endometrial Receptivity Profile in Patients With Endometrial Proliferation Defects [NCT02406690]1 participants (Actual)Observational2015-07-31Completed
Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of Vaginal Repair With Leuprorelin and Vaginal Repair in the Treatment of Cesarean Section Scar Defect [NCT05206682]94 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-01Not yet recruiting
"Leuplin SR 11.25 mg for Injection Specified Drug-use Survey Long-term Use Survey on Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients (96 Weeks)" [NCT02154139]651 participants (Actual)Observational2005-12-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00001259 (1) [back to overview]Mean Beck Depression Inventory Score
NCT00001322 (1) [back to overview]Mean Beck Depression Inventory Score
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Disease-specific Survival Rate (10 Years)
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Distant Failure Rate (10 Years)
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Biochemical Failure Rate (10 Years)
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Clinical Relapse Rate (10 Years)
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival Rate (10 Years)
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Local Progression Rate (10 Years)
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rate (10-year)
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Positive Re-biopsy Rate at Two Years
NCT00002597 (9) [back to overview]Second Biochemical Relapse Rate (10 Years)
NCT00003645 (2) [back to overview]Quality of Life for Participants
NCT00003645 (2) [back to overview]"Number of Wives of the Participants Having Better Than or Equal to a Good Quality of Life"
NCT00004635 (2) [back to overview]The Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00004635 (2) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00016913 (3) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT00016913 (3) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Failure
NCT00016913 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00028769 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00028769 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00028769 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through Grade 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
NCT00081159 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00081159 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00081159 (3) [back to overview]Major Bone Scan Response
NCT00123110 (8) [back to overview]Percent Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment Index of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
NCT00123110 (8) [back to overview]Percent Change in Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline
NCT00123110 (8) [back to overview]Percent Change in Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT00123110 (8) [back to overview]Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (DHEA-S)
NCT00123110 (8) [back to overview]Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL)
NCT00123110 (8) [back to overview]Percent Change in Free Testosterone (T)
NCT00123110 (8) [back to overview]Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT00123110 (8) [back to overview]Change in Insulin Sensitivity
NCT00170157 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Progression-free at 18 Months
NCT00170157 (2) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Undetectable Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 2: Mean Leptin Levels Over 24 Hours, Per Patient [Baseline]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 3: Insulin Sensitivity Index (SI) From Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test [Baseline]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 2: Mean Leptin Levels Over 24 Hours, Per Patient [After Treatment]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 2: Mean Cortisol Levels Over 24 Hours, Per Patient [Baseline]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 3: Insulin Sensitivity Index (SI) From Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test [After 3 Nights of SWS Suppression]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 2: Insulin Sensitivity Index (SI) From Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test [After CPAP]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 2: Acute Insulin Resistance to Intravenous Glucose (AIRg) [Baseline]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 2: Acute Insulin Resistance to Intravenous Glucose (AIRg) [After CPAP]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 2: Mean Cortisol Levels Over 24 Hours, Per Patient [After Treatment]
NCT00203996 (10) [back to overview]Aim 2: Insulin Sensitivity Index (SI) From Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test [Baseline]
NCT00223665 (15) [back to overview]Change in Standardized Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Left Hip During IAS
NCT00223665 (15) [back to overview]Score on Spatial Memory Testing During First Cycle of IAS
NCT00223665 (15) [back to overview]Score on Verbal Ability/Fluency Testing During First Cycle of IAS
NCT00223665 (15) [back to overview]Score on Verbal Memory Testing (Proactive Interference) During First Cycle of IAS
NCT00223665 (15) [back to overview]Development of Osteopenia (Bone Loss) During IAS
NCT00223665 (15) [back to overview]Effect of IAS on Overall Survival.
NCT00223665 (15) [back to overview]Time to Androgen Independence of Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)
NCT00223665 (15) [back to overview]Score on Verbal Memory Testing (Story Recall) During First Cycle of IAS
NCT00223665 (15) [back to overview]Change in Standardized Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine During IAS
NCT00223665 (15) [back to overview]Estradiol Levels During First Cycle of IAS
NCT00223665 (15) [back to overview]Score on Executive Function Testing (Stroop Task) During First Cycle of IAS
NCT00223665 (15) [back to overview]Score on Spatial Ability Test (Block Design) During First Cycle of IAS
NCT00223665 (15) [back to overview]Score on Spatial Ability Test (Mental Rotation) During First Cycle of IAS
NCT00223665 (15) [back to overview]Score on Visual Working Memory Test During First Cycle of IAS
NCT00223665 (15) [back to overview]Testosterone Levels During IAS
NCT00225420 (2) [back to overview]Biochemical Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00225420 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients Experiencing Dose-Limiting Toxicities
NCT00254397 (4) [back to overview]Summary of Adverse Events by Grade/Relationship
NCT00254397 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With T-cell Response to Peptide Vaccine
NCT00254397 (4) [back to overview]Most Frequent and Most Serious Participant Adverse Events During Vaccine Treatment for Overall Study
NCT00254397 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events by Maximum Grade Within Different Arms
NCT00275262 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in TREC Per 100,000 CD8+ Cells to Final Visit in Patients Treated With LAD (11.25 mg) or Placebo After Transplant
NCT00275262 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in T Cell Excision Circles (TREC) Per 100,000 CD4+ Cells to Final Visit in Patients Treated With LAD (11.25 mg) or Placebo After Transplant
NCT00275262 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Interferon Gamma Response (Spots/1 Million Cells) Before KLH Vaccination at Month 6 and After KLH Vaccination at Month 7 in Patients Who Received LAD or Placebo
NCT00275262 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IgM Response (Mcg/mL) Before Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH) Vaccination at Month 6 and After KLH Vaccination at Month 7 in Patients Who Received LAD or Placebo
NCT00275262 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IgG1 Response (Mcg/mL) Before KLH Vaccination at Month 6 and After KLH Vaccination at Month 7 in Patients Who Received LAD or Placebo
NCT00283062 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) Assessment - Number of Participants With Disease Progression
NCT00283062 (4) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00283062 (4) [back to overview]To Evaluate Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured Using a Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Questionnaire
NCT00283062 (4) [back to overview]Assessment of Safety and Tolerability - Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)
NCT00295750 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Testosterone Level <=0.5 ng/mL at Day 3
NCT00295750 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Testosterone <=0.5ng/mL From Day 28 Through Day 364
NCT00295750 (9) [back to overview]The Mean Value of QTc Interval as Measured by Electrocardiogram
NCT00295750 (9) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Prostate-specific Antigen From Baseline to Day 14 and Day 28
NCT00295750 (9) [back to overview]Participants With Markedly Abnormal Change in Vital Signs and Body Weight
NCT00295750 (9) [back to overview]Participants With Markedly Abnormal Change in Laboratory Variables (>=20 Percent of Patients)
NCT00295750 (9) [back to overview]Participants Grouped by Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Failure
NCT00295750 (9) [back to overview]Frequency and Size of Testosterone Changes at Day 255 and/or Day 259 Compared to the Testosterone Level at Day 252
NCT00295750 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Testosterone Surge During the First Two Weeks of Treatment
NCT00355030 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With One or More Drug-related Adverse Events
NCT00355030 (9) [back to overview]Bone Age
NCT00355030 (9) [back to overview]Adult Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS)
NCT00355030 (9) [back to overview]Difference Between Adult Height SDS and Baseline Height SDS
NCT00355030 (9) [back to overview]Difference Between Adult Height SDS and Baseline Predicted Height SDS
NCT00355030 (9) [back to overview]Difference Between Adult Height SDS and Target Height SDS
NCT00355030 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Children With Normal Adult Height SDS
NCT00355030 (9) [back to overview]Height SDS
NCT00355030 (9) [back to overview]Height Velocity
NCT00388804 (1) [back to overview]Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Failures
NCT00429494 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Secondary Amenorrhea Following 3-month Depot Leuprolide
NCT00430183 (2) [back to overview]5-year bPFS Rate
NCT00430183 (2) [back to overview]Proportion of Biochemical Progression-Free Survival (bPFS Proportion) at 3 Years
NCT00451958 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables
NCT00451958 (8) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From the Time of Switch From Leuprolide to Degarelix to Day 56
NCT00451958 (8) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Testosterone From the Time of Switch From Leuprolide to Degarelix up to Day 56
NCT00451958 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight
NCT00451958 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With no Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression
NCT00451958 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Testosterone Level Maintained at <=0.5 ng/mL From Day 28 in CS21 and Onwards
NCT00451958 (8) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) From the Time of Switch From Leuprolide to Degarelix to Day 56
NCT00451958 (8) [back to overview]Serum Levels of PSA From the Time of Switch From Leuprolide to Degarelix to Day 56
NCT00455689 (2) [back to overview]Change in Subjective Sleep Quality
NCT00455689 (2) [back to overview]Percent Change in Objective Sleep Efficiency
NCT00500110 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Pathological Complete Response
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Total Score at End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Erectile Function Domain of International Index of Erectile Function (EF-IIEF) Total Score at EOT
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 36 in Testosterone Specific Evaluable Population
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 36 in ITT Population
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS): Number of Participants Who Died (All Cause)
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Testosterone Specific Evaluable Population
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Index Score at EOT
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Cancer-Specific Survival: Number of Participants Who Died (Cancer-Specific)
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Score at EOT
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Treatment Failure (no PSA Threshold Below 4 ng/dl, or no PSA Below Baseline Level Before LHRH Treatment).
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Relapse
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Count of Patients Remaining Off of Therapy
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]CR Without ADT in Patients With Metastases Limited to Pelvic Lymph Nodes.
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Follow-up of the 8 Patients With Metastases Limited to Pelvic Lymph Nodes.
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Length of Follow-up
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Patients Who Achieved PSA Nadir of < 0.2 at 36 Weeks.
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Prostate Cancer (Cause-specific Mortality)
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Free From Progression (FFP) at 5 Years
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Free From Hormone-refractory Disease (Castrate-resistant Disease)
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Mortality)
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Local Failure
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events ≤ 90 Days of the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Late Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events > 90 Days From the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Secondary Biochemical Failure (Alternative Biochemical Failure)
NCT00582556 (4) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Had a Significant Change in Immune Markers.
NCT00582556 (4) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Decreases in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) After Zoledronic Acid Prior to Beginning Androgen Deprivation Therapy
NCT00582556 (4) [back to overview]The Number of Subjects Who Had a Significant Increase of Peripheral Blood Markers of Bone Turnover.
NCT00582556 (4) [back to overview]The Number of Subjects Who Had Either an Increase or Decrease on Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine and Femoral Neck in Men Undergoing Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Adenocarcinoma.
NCT00587431 (2) [back to overview]The Effects of Testosterone Administration on Docetaxel Pharmacokinetics.
NCT00587431 (2) [back to overview]PSA of <_ 0.05 ng/ml After Radical Prostatectomy or Radiation Therapy and PSA <_ 2.0 ng/ml for Patients With Clinical Metastases Without Prior Definitive Therapy
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Gleason Score
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Levels of DHEA in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Levels of DHEA-S in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Levels of DHT in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Levels of PSA in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Levels of Testosterone in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
NCT00621179 (1) [back to overview]Patients Who Responded to Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation
NCT00626431 (11) [back to overview]Adjusted Percentage of Subjects With Suppression of Serum Testosterone (<=50 ng/dL) From Week 4 to Week 48 for Formulation A: ITT Population for the Primary Endpoint Adjusted
NCT00626431 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Suppression of Serum Testosterone (<=50 ng/dL) From Week 4 to Week 48 for Formulation B: ITT Population for the Primary Endpoint Preplanned
NCT00626431 (11) [back to overview]Mean (+/- Standard Error) Acute-on-chronic Changes in Luteinizing Hormone From Pre-injection Levels for Formulation A: ITT Population
NCT00626431 (11) [back to overview]Mean Testosterone Concentration (+/- Standard Error) at Each Visit for Formulation B: ITT Population
NCT00626431 (11) [back to overview]Mean (+/- Standard Error) Acute-on-chronic Changes in Luteinizing Hormone From Pre-injection Levels for Formulation B: ITT Population
NCT00626431 (11) [back to overview]Mean (+/- Standard Error) Acute-on-chronic Changes in Testosterone From Pre-injection Levels for Formulation A: ITT Population
NCT00626431 (11) [back to overview]Mean (+/- Standard Error) Acute-on-chronic Changes in Testosterone From Pre-injection Levels for Formulation B: ITT Population
NCT00626431 (11) [back to overview]Mean (+/- Standard Error) Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) at Baseline, Visits Throughout the Study, and at Final Visit for Formulation A: ITT Population
NCT00626431 (11) [back to overview]Mean (+/- Standard Error) Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) at Baseline, Visits Throughout the Study, and at Final Visit for Formulation B: ITT Population
NCT00626431 (11) [back to overview]Mean Testosterone Concentration (+/- Standard Error) at Each Visit for Formulation A: ITT Population
NCT00626431 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Suppression of Serum Testosterone (<=50 ng/dL) From Week 4 to Week 48 for Formulation A: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population for the Primary Endpoint.
NCT00635817 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Testosterone in <30 ng/dL by Visit
NCT00635817 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Basal Estradiol <20 pg/mL by Visit
NCT00635817 (10) [back to overview]Peak-stimulated Luteinizing Hormone Concentration by Visit
NCT00635817 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Incremental Growth Rate (cm/Year) at Month 6
NCT00635817 (10) [back to overview]Ratio of Change From Baseline in Bone Age/Change From Baseline in Chronological Age at Month 6
NCT00635817 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Suppression of the Physical Signs of Puberty (Testicular Volume and Genital Development) at Month 6
NCT00635817 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Suppression of the Physical Signs of Puberty (Breast Development) at Month 6
NCT00635817 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Peak Stimulated Luteinizing Hormone (<4 mIU/mL) From Month 2 Through Month 6
NCT00635817 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Decrease From Baseline in the Ratio of Bone Age to Chronological Age at Month 6 Compared to Baseline
NCT00635817 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Peak Stimulated Luteinizing Hormone (< 4 mIU/mL) From Month 2 Through Month 6 (Simple Percentage With Binomial Exact Confidence Intervals)
NCT00660010 (11) [back to overview]Mean Stimulated Testosterone Concentrations in Males
NCT00660010 (11) [back to overview]Mean Time to or Mean Age at Regular Menses in Females After Treatment
NCT00660010 (11) [back to overview]Number of Female Subjects Who Reported Regular Menses at Adulthood
NCT00660010 (11) [back to overview]Number of Pregnancies Reported by Subjects at Final Questionnaire
NCT00660010 (11) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Reported Pregnancies at Final Questionnaire
NCT00660010 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects (n/N) With Suppression of Clinical Sexual Characteristics According to Tanner Staging (Breast Development in Females)
NCT00660010 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects (n/N) With Suppression of Clinical Sexual Characteristics According to Tanner Staging (Genital Development in Males)
NCT00660010 (11) [back to overview]Posttreatment Height (ht.) Compared to Standard Population and as Predicted From Ht. at Baseline (BL)
NCT00660010 (11) [back to overview]Mean Peak Stimulated Luteinizing Hormone (LH) and Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Concentrations
NCT00660010 (11) [back to overview]Mean Ratio of Bone Age to Chronological Age
NCT00660010 (11) [back to overview]Mean Stimulated Estradiol Concentrations in Females
NCT00667446 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Growth Rate
NCT00667446 (9) [back to overview]Mean Peak-stimulated Luteinizing Hormone Concentration by Visit
NCT00667446 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Female Participants With Suppression of Basal Estradiol (Assay 1)
NCT00667446 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Female Participants With Suppression of Basal Estradiol (Assay 2)
NCT00667446 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Female Participants With Suppression of the Physical Signs of Puberty (Breast Development)
NCT00667446 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Male Participants With Suppression of Basal Testosterone
NCT00667446 (9) [back to overview]Ratio of Change From Baseline in Bone Age/Change From Baseline in Chronological Age
NCT00667446 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Peak-Stimulated Luteinizing Hormone
NCT00667446 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Male Participants With Suppression of the Physical Signs of Puberty (Testicular Volume and Genital Development)
NCT00669162 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Can Safely Tolerate and Complete Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy, Radiation Therapy and Docetaxel After a Radical Prostatectomy
NCT00687739 (5) [back to overview]Fat Mass
NCT00687739 (5) [back to overview]Fat-free Mass
NCT00687739 (5) [back to overview]Resting Energy Expenditure (REE)
NCT00687739 (5) [back to overview]Total Energy Expenditure (TEE)
NCT00687739 (5) [back to overview]Cortisol Response (Area Under the Curve) to CRH Under DEX Suppression
NCT00740831 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Reduction of Uterine Bleeding at Week 13 Visit Defined as Pictorial Blood-loss Assessment Chart (PBAC) Score < 75 at End-of-treatment Visit (Week 13 Visit)
NCT00740831 (4) [back to overview]Change in the Total Volume of the Three Largest Myomas From Baseline to Week 13
NCT00740831 (4) [back to overview]Co-primary Safety Endpoint: % of Subjects Reporting Moderate or Severe Hot Flushes as Adverse Events Throughout the Treatment Period for PGL4001 Compared With GnRH-agonist
NCT00740831 (4) [back to overview]Co-primary Safety Endpoint: Serum Estradiol Levels at End of Treatment Visit (Week 13 Visit) for PGL4001 Compared With GnRHagonist
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain CPSSS Component
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum N-telopeptide Concentration at Week 12
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Number of Days to First Posttreatment Menses
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 12
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 12
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Average Number of Hot Flashes Per Day
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS)
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Sum of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Concentration of Serum Estradiol
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Days With Uterine Bleeding
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much Improved
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12
NCT00797225 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS
NCT00805935 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Oocytes Fertilized of the Total Number of Oocytes Retrieved
NCT00805935 (13) [back to overview]Number of Follicles Observed at Day 15
NCT00805935 (13) [back to overview]Number of Oocytes Retrieved at Day 18
NCT00805935 (13) [back to overview]Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
NCT00805935 (13) [back to overview]Participants With Cycle Cancellation Due to Risk of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS) Between Weeks 1 - 3
NCT00805935 (13) [back to overview]Number of Embryos Transferred at Three Stages of Development Before Implantation
NCT00805935 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Ongoing Pregnancy at Week 9
NCT00805935 (13) [back to overview]Progesterone Levels at Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) Administration
NCT00805935 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Pregnancy at Approximately Day 38
NCT00805935 (13) [back to overview]Estradiol Levels at Day 6
NCT00805935 (13) [back to overview]Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) Levels at Day 6
NCT00805935 (13) [back to overview]Number of Embryos Frozen
NCT00805935 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Clinical Pregnancy at Week 7
NCT00903162 (1) [back to overview]Tolerability at One Year of Ovarian Function Suppression (OFS) Using Leuprolide and Letrozole.
NCT00924469 (7) [back to overview]Androstenedione and Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) Concentrations in Prostate Tissue
NCT00924469 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response
NCT00924469 (7) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Androgens
NCT00924469 (7) [back to overview]Testosterone and Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Concentration in Prostate Tissue
NCT00924469 (7) [back to overview]Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Concentration in Prostate Tissue
NCT00924469 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response (CR)
NCT00924469 (7) [back to overview]Testosterone Concentration in Prostate Tissue
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the SFI: Ejaculation
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the Sexual Function Index (SFI): Sexual Drive
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) : Physical Well-being
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the FACT-P: Total FACT-P Score
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the FACT-P : Social Well-being
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the FACT-P : Functional Well-being
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in Serum PSA Levels
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Time to Return to Testosterone >0.5 ng/mL Level in the DI Treatment Group
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the SFI: Problem Assessment
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone Levels
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the FACT-P : Additional Concerns
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the FACT-P : Emotional Well-being
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the SFI: Total SFI Score
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the SFI: Overall Satisfaction With Sex Life
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the SFI: Erection
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone Levels
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Serum PSA Levels ≤4.0 ng/mL
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With a Serum PSA Level ≤4.0 ng/mL
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Time to Return to Normal Range (≥1.5 ng/mL) or Baseline Testosterone Level
NCT00928434 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Serum PSA Levels
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Domain Score
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Late Grade 3+ Adverse Events
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Dead Due to Cause Other Than Prostate Cancer (Non-Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality)
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival)
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Acute Adverse Events
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Failed (Freedom From Failure)
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Receiving Salvage Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Dead Due to Prostate Cancer (Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality)
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Local Recurrence
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Bowel Domain Score
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Domain Score
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Urinary Domain Score
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Domain Score
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival) by Radiation Therapy Modality
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure
NCT00937768 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Regardless of Attribution
NCT00937768 (4) [back to overview]Number of Deaths
NCT00937768 (4) [back to overview]Average Overall FACT-P Total Score at Baseline, Months 3 and 6
NCT00937768 (4) [back to overview]Average LASA Overall Quality of Life at Baseline, Months 3 and 6
NCT01023061 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Acute and Chronic Grade 3 or Greater Toxicity as Evaluated Using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 3.0
NCT01023061 (3) [back to overview]Median Time to Prostate Specific Antigen Progression
NCT01023061 (3) [back to overview]Levels of Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and Testosterone in Prostate Biopsy Sample Assessed by Mass Spectrometry
NCT01076335 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Progression Free at 1 Year
NCT01078545 (5) [back to overview]The Change in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) From Baseline to 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months.
NCT01078545 (5) [back to overview]The Change in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) From Baseline to Month 12. The IPSS Has a Range From 0 to 35.
NCT01078545 (5) [back to overview]Changes in the Intensity of Symptoms Connected With Prostate Cancer From Baseline to Month 3, 6, 9, and 12.
NCT01078545 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients at Baseline With One of the Symptoms Connected With Prostate Cancer.
NCT01078545 (5) [back to overview]Reported Adverse Events/Serious Adverse Events
NCT01081873 (17) [back to overview]Epidemiological Data: Node Staging - the Number of Participants With a Positive or Negative Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Test
NCT01081873 (17) [back to overview]Epidemiological Data: Race
NCT01081873 (17) [back to overview]Effectiveness Parameter for Screening or Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Mean Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) at Each Visit
NCT01081873 (17) [back to overview]Epidemiological Data: the Number of Participants With Tumor Stages T0, T1, T2, T3, and T4.
NCT01081873 (17) [back to overview]Epidemiological Data: Tumor Staging - Among Participants With a Positive Biopsy, the Number of Participants With Adenocarcinoma Tissue or Other Tissues Recorded for the Positive Biopsy.
NCT01081873 (17) [back to overview]Treatment Patterns for Prostate Cancer Treatments: Number of Participants at Each Visit Who Took Lucrin/Lucrin Tridepot, Luteinizing Hormone-releasing Hormone (LHRH) Agonists, Anti-androgens, or Other Drug Treatments, or Who Had Surgery or Radiotherapy.
NCT01081873 (17) [back to overview]Effectiveness Parameter for Prognosis: the Number of Participants With a Survival Prognosis of > 10 Years, 5 - 10 Years, 1 - 5 Years, 6 - 12 Months, and < 6 Months
NCT01081873 (17) [back to overview]Epidemiological Data: Tumor Staging (Positive or Negative) Via a Rectal Examination, Prostate Biopsy, Echograph, or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Test.
NCT01081873 (17) [back to overview]Effectiveness Parameter for Staging of Prostate Cancer: Metastases at Each Visit
NCT01081873 (17) [back to overview]Effectiveness Parameter: the Number of Participants With a Complete or Partial Response, Stable Disease, or Progressive Disease Following Treatment at Each Visit
NCT01081873 (17) [back to overview]Epidemiological Data: Bone Scan at Baseline
NCT01081873 (17) [back to overview]Epidemiological Data: Mean Weight
NCT01081873 (17) [back to overview]Safety Parameter: Number of Participants Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01081873 (17) [back to overview]Epidemiological Data: PSA at Baseline
NCT01081873 (17) [back to overview]Epidemiological Data: Mean Age
NCT01081873 (17) [back to overview]Epidemiological Data: Metastasis Staging (M0 or M1) at Baseline
NCT01081873 (17) [back to overview]Epidemiological Data: Node Staging - the Number of Participants With a N0 or N1 Stage at Baseline.
NCT01088529 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Pathology Tumor Stage of Less Than or Equal to Prostate Cancer Stage at Which the Tumor is Confined to the Prostate (pT2)
NCT01088529 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Positive Surgical Margin at Radical Prostatectomy
NCT01088529 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Prostate-Specific Antigen Response
NCT01116401 (2) [back to overview]Percent Change in Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)
NCT01116401 (2) [back to overview]Change in Montgomery-Asperg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Correlation of microRNA Measures With 28-week PSA Response
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Undetectable PSA Rate
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Correlation of microRNA Measures With Baseline Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Counts
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Who do Not Achieve a Partial PSA Response
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Change in Level of IGFBP2, IGFBP3 and Growth Hormone
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Change in Level of IGF-I, Free IGF-I and C-peptide
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Change in Level of Insulin
NCT01136226 (1) [back to overview]Serum Testosterone Recovery
NCT01161563 (2) [back to overview]Discomfort From Injection
NCT01161563 (2) [back to overview]Patient Bother From Injection Site Burning and/or Stinging
NCT01194271 (1) [back to overview]Immunologic Response: Number of Participants With Immune Response
NCT01257802 (5) [back to overview]Count of Patients With AMH of ≤1.0 ng/mL vs >1 ng/mL,
NCT01257802 (5) [back to overview]Mean Antral Follicle Count (AFC)
NCT01257802 (5) [back to overview]Mean Ovarian Volume.
NCT01257802 (5) [back to overview]Anti-mullerian Hormone (AMH) Measured as a Continuous Variable, Specifically Assessing the Intra-person Change From Study Entry (Day 0) to 6-month Post-intervention Visit
NCT01257802 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Either an AMH Level of >1 ng/mL OR Antral Follicle Count of >4.
NCT01269125 (5) [back to overview]Clinical Pregnancy Rate
NCT01269125 (5) [back to overview]Fertilization Rate (Percentage of Fertilized Oocytes).
NCT01269125 (5) [back to overview]Follicular Fluid's TNF-a Concentration.
NCT01269125 (5) [back to overview]Embryo Quality (the Percentage of Grade 1 Embryos Per Participant).
NCT01269125 (5) [back to overview]Clinical Pregnancy Rate
NCT01326312 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Are Castrate by Day 60
NCT01326312 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Are Castrate by Day 60 and Maintained Castrate Range From Day 60 to Day 360/End of Study.
NCT01326312 (3) [back to overview]Time to Castration in Participants With Prostate Cancer
NCT01338987 (4) [back to overview]Time to Engraftment in First Transplant Recipients Only With Median Thoracic Spine Standardized Uptake Values (SUV) of 1.4 or Greater Than Those Patients With SUV's Less Than 1.4
NCT01338987 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of B Cells at One Year Post-transplant in Participants Who Did/Did Not Receive Leuprolide Following Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
NCT01338987 (4) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events Related to Study Drug Experienced by Participants After Second Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
NCT01338987 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)
NCT01343368 (15) [back to overview]Comparison of Lutineizing Hormone (LH) Levels
NCT01343368 (15) [back to overview]Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
NCT01343368 (15) [back to overview]Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
NCT01343368 (15) [back to overview]Comparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After Transplant
NCT01343368 (15) [back to overview]Comparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After Transplant
NCT01343368 (15) [back to overview]Comparison of Number of Patients With Ovarian Failure
NCT01343368 (15) [back to overview]Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
NCT01343368 (15) [back to overview]Comparison of Number of Patients Who Stopped Menstrual Bleeding
NCT01343368 (15) [back to overview]Comparison of Number of Patients Who Resumed Menstrual Cycles
NCT01343368 (15) [back to overview]Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels
NCT01343368 (15) [back to overview]Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels
NCT01343368 (15) [back to overview]Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels
NCT01343368 (15) [back to overview]Comparison of Leuprolide Hormone (LH) Levels
NCT01343368 (15) [back to overview]Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
NCT01343368 (15) [back to overview]Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
NCT01377389 (6) [back to overview]The Number of Clonal Expansion of Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) T-cells
NCT01377389 (6) [back to overview]Time to Progression of Disease (PD) Off Androgen Depravation Therapy (ADT), After Treatment With Intermittent ADT Plus Ipilimumab.
NCT01377389 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01377389 (6) [back to overview]Time to Testosterone Recovery (> 50ng/mL) in Patients Treated With Intermittent ADT Plus Ipilimumab.
NCT01377389 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Progressed After 7 Months of Being on Treatment
NCT01377389 (6) [back to overview]The Total Number of Study Drug Related Events Indicated by the Participants
NCT01415960 (7) [back to overview]Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Concentrations
NCT01415960 (7) [back to overview]Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)
NCT01415960 (7) [back to overview]Determination of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
NCT01415960 (7) [back to overview]Safety Endpoints
NCT01415960 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Chemical Castration (Defined as Testosterone Levels ≤ 0.5 ng/mL) at Days 28, 84, and 168.
NCT01415960 (7) [back to overview]Determination of Leuprolide Tmax
NCT01415960 (7) [back to overview]Determination of Leuprolide Cmax
NCT01431391 (2) [back to overview]Immune Response at Month 24 as Evaluated by IFN-γ ELISPOT Specific for PA2024
NCT01431391 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Immune Response As Evaluated by IFN-γ ELISPOT Specific for PA2024
NCT01443546 (1) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Having Adverse Events
NCT01531205 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Detecting Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC)
NCT01531205 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Perioperative and Postoperative Morbidity
NCT01531205 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of PSA Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01531205 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Complete Response (CR)
NCT01531205 (5) [back to overview]Surgical Margin Negative Rate (SM Rate)
NCT01546454 (1) [back to overview]Total to HDL Cholesterol Ratio
NCT01546623 (11) [back to overview]Time Course of Changes in Serum Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)
NCT01546623 (11) [back to overview]Time Course of Changes in Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
NCT01546623 (11) [back to overview]Time Course of Changes in Serum Testosterone
NCT01546623 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression by PSA (FAS)
NCT01546623 (11) [back to overview]Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
NCT01546623 (11) [back to overview]Soft Tissue Response
NCT01546623 (11) [back to overview]12-lead ECG
NCT01546623 (11) [back to overview]The Maximum Rate of Change in PSA Suppression (FAS)
NCT01546623 (11) [back to overview]Bone Lesion Response
NCT01546623 (11) [back to overview]Time Course of Change Rate in Serum PSA (FAS)
NCT01546623 (11) [back to overview]The Rate of Suppression of Serum Testosterone to Castrate Level
NCT01546649 (8) [back to overview]Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
NCT01546649 (8) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS) Rate at Week 96
NCT01546649 (8) [back to overview]Distant Disease Free Survival (DDFS) Rate at Week 96
NCT01546649 (8) [back to overview]Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
NCT01546649 (8) [back to overview]Concentration of Serum E2
NCT01546649 (8) [back to overview]QT Interval Measured by 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
NCT01546649 (8) [back to overview]Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level
NCT01546649 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Suppressive Effect of Serum Estradiol (E2) to Menopausal Level (=<30 pg/mL) From Week 4 Through Week 48
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol)
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Death Due to Prostate Cancer
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastases
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With General Clinical Treatment Failure
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Local Progression
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Alive [Overall Survival] (Primary Endpoint of Original Protocol)
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One Year
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Fasting Total Cholesterol
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Hemoglobin A1c
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Clinical Survivorship Events
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Serum High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Serum High-density Lipoprotein (LDL)
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Serum Testosterone
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Testosterone Recovery at 12 and 24 Months
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Median Testosterone Recovery Time
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form at One Year
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Extracapsular Extension: Local Review
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Positive Surgical Margins
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Pharmacodynamic Effects: Assessment of Androgen Receptor Signaling as Measured by Intensity of Androgen Receptor Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Pharmacodynamic Effects: Tissue Testosterone
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Pharmacodynamic Effects: Tissue Dihydrotestosterone (DHT)
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Pharmacodynamic Effects: Assessment of Mitotic Index
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 Role-Emotional Domain Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) That Led to Dose Interruption, Dose Reduction, and Study Drug Discontinuation
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Nadir
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT): Baseline
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Extracapsular Extension: Central Review
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone at Day 180
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at Day 180
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT): Day 180
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Serum Testosterone: Baseline
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Serum Testosterone: Day 180
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Nadir
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Bother Subscale Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Domain Summary Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Bother Subscale Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Reduction in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Function Subscale Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Domain Summary Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 General Health Domain Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 Mental Component Summary
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 Physical Functioning Domain Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Function Subscale Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Pathologic Complete Response Rate
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Positive Lymph Nodes
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Positive Seminal Vesicles
NCT01642186 (5) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01642186 (5) [back to overview]Median PFS
NCT01642186 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With One or More Adverse Events/Toxicity
NCT01642186 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease
NCT01642186 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Tissue Biomarkers Collected
NCT01674140 (4) [back to overview]Invasive Disease-Free Survival (IDFS)
NCT01674140 (4) [back to overview]Distant Recurrence-Free Survival (DRFS)
NCT01674140 (4) [back to overview]Toxicity Based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0, Assessed up to 10 Years.
NCT01674140 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01712230 (3) [back to overview]Total Fat Mass
NCT01712230 (3) [back to overview]Total Fat Free Mass
NCT01712230 (3) [back to overview]Change in Physical Activity Energy Expenditure (PAEE)
NCT01750398 (7) [back to overview]Change in C-telopeptides
NCT01750398 (7) [back to overview]Patients With PSA <4 ng/mL at the End of the Study
NCT01750398 (7) [back to overview]Change in Waist Circumference
NCT01750398 (7) [back to overview]Change in Weight
NCT01750398 (7) [back to overview]Complete PSA Response
NCT01750398 (7) [back to overview]Radiographic or Clinical Progression
NCT01750398 (7) [back to overview]Quality of Life Survey
NCT01762943 (2) [back to overview]Change in Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) Dysphoria Score
NCT01762943 (2) [back to overview]Blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) Response During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) z Statistic
NCT01921166 (2) [back to overview]Oocytes
NCT01921166 (2) [back to overview]Number of Oocytes Vitrified
NCT02057939 (7) [back to overview]Time to Testosterone Recovery
NCT02057939 (7) [back to overview]Biochemical Progression-free Survival
NCT02057939 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events Related to Combination Enzalutamide, ADT, and XRT
NCT02057939 (7) [back to overview]PSA Nadir
NCT02057939 (7) [back to overview]Three Year Progression-free Survival
NCT02057939 (7) [back to overview]Two Year Progression-free Survival
NCT02057939 (7) [back to overview]PSA Less Than 0.1
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]The Number of Participants With a CTC Response
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]The Percentage of Patients Responding
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Bone Metastases Progression Free at Six Months
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 2 Years
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Progression-free at 6 Months
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Progression Free at One Year
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With PSA Remission Assessed Using the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2) Criteria
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Achievement of PSA Response Assessed Using PCWG2 Criteria
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Achievement of Measurable Disease Response
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Frequency of Treatment Delay
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Frequency of Dose Modification
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Achieve a PSA ≤ 4ng/mL After Seven Months of Protocol Treatment in Each Arm
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Clinical Progression-free Survival Rate
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Biochemical Progression-free Survival Rate
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Who Achieve Undetectable PSA (<0.2ng/mL)
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade >=3 Adverse Events That Are Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related to Study Treatment
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Therapy
NCT02064582 (2) [back to overview]Safety, as Measured by the Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Event as Assess by NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) vs. 40 When Combining Enzalutamide With a GnRH and External Beam Radiation
NCT02064582 (2) [back to overview]Fold Change in Intra-tumoral Androgen Regulated Gene Expression Pre and Post Combination Therapy
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Serum Sex Hormone-binding Globulin (SHBG) Concentrations
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Time to Achieve Testosterone Concentrations < 50 ng/dL and < 20 ng/dL
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-P25 Score
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Effective Castration Rate Over 24 Weeks
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Prostate-Specific Antigen Nadir
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]TAK-385 Plasma Concentrations
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAES Related to Clinical Laboratory Test Results
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Physical Examination
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Related to Vital Signs
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline of Aging Male Survey (AMS) Total Score
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response of ≥ 50% and ≥ 90% Reduction at 4 Weeks
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Concentrations
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Concentration at the End of Weeks 12 and 24
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Serum Sex Hormone-binding Globulin (SHBG) Concentrations
NCT02083185 (19) [back to overview]Serum Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Concentrations
NCT02085252 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Negative Biopsies at Month 12
NCT02085252 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
NCT02085252 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Gleason Score ≥ 7
NCT02085252 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Questionnaire Score
NCT02085252 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) Total Symptom (S) Score
NCT02085252 (8) [back to overview]Highest Diameter of the Lesion as a Measure of Tumor Radiologic Progression Using Dynamic MRI
NCT02085252 (8) [back to overview]Prostatic Volume as a Measure of Tumor Radiologic Progression Using Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
NCT02085252 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Levels
NCT02122198 (16) [back to overview]Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Digits Span Forward and Backward, 6 Months
NCT02122198 (16) [back to overview]Changes in Prefrontal Cortex Brain Activation at 9 Months
NCT02122198 (16) [back to overview]Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: RAVLT, 9 Months
NCT02122198 (16) [back to overview]Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: RAVLT, 6 Months
NCT02122198 (16) [back to overview]Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Controlled Oral Word Association Test, 9 Months
NCT02122198 (16) [back to overview]Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Controlled Oral Word Association Test, 6 Months
NCT02122198 (16) [back to overview]Changes in Artery Compliance at 9 Months
NCT02122198 (16) [back to overview]Changes in Artery Compliance at 6 Months
NCT02122198 (16) [back to overview]Changes in Prefrontal Cortex Brain Activation at 6 Months
NCT02122198 (16) [back to overview]Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Stroop, 6 Months
NCT02122198 (16) [back to overview]Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Stroop, 9 Months
NCT02122198 (16) [back to overview]Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Trails A, 6 Months
NCT02122198 (16) [back to overview]Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Trails A, 9 Months
NCT02122198 (16) [back to overview]Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Trails B, 6 Months
NCT02122198 (16) [back to overview]Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Digits, 9 Months
NCT02122198 (16) [back to overview]Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Trails B, 9 Months
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients Treated With Anticancer Drugs (QOL-ACD) Total and Subscale Score at Baseline
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]Score of QOL-ACD-B at Week 12
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]Score of QOL-ACD-B at Week 48
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Felt Relief From Physical and Emotional Burden
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Worried About the Effect of the Medicinal Agent
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Change in Adverse Drug Reactions Due to the Change in Medicinal Agents
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Change in Pain at the Time of Injection Due to the Change in Medicinal Agents
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Positive Change in Agents
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Reduction in Frequency of Medical Visits Due to Change in Medicinal Agents
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Relief From Financial Burden Due to the Change in Medicinal Agents
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]QOL-ACD Breast (QOL-ACD-B) Score at Baseline
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]QOL-ACD Total and Subscale Score at Week 12
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]Score of QOL-ACD-B Items 19, 20 and 21 at Baseline
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]QOL-ACD Total and Subscale Score at Week 48
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Serious Adverse Drug Reactions
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]Score of QOL-ACD-B Items 19, 20 and 21 at Week 12
NCT02134977 (18) [back to overview]Score of QOL-ACD-B Items 19, 20 and 21 at Week 48
NCT02154139 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions
NCT02154139 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Serious Adverse Drug Reactions
NCT02154139 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival
NCT02154139 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Recurrence-free Survival Who Were Treated With the Drug as Adjuvant Therapy
NCT02154139 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Advanced or Recurrent Breast Cancer (Best Response)
NCT02167893 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on TNM Classification
NCT02167893 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions
NCT02167893 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) Based on TNM Classification
NCT02167893 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Serious Adverse Drug Reactions
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Last Question on International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Scores (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Percentage Body Fat Mass as Measured by Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Percentage of Body Fat (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Serum 25-(OH) Vitamin D (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Waist Circumference (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants in the Non-randomized, Pilot, Cohort Who Completed Clinic Visits
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Blood Pressure (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Bone Density T-score (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26) Scores to Assess Erectile and Urinary Function (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Fasting Lipids (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Hours Per Week of Physical Activity Category as Measured by the Exercise Pattern Assessment (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Lee Fatigue Scale Scores (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in the 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Assessment Item Scores for Patients in the Randomized Cohort
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Hemoglobin A1c (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Attention Function Index (AFI) Scores (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Average Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) as Measured by an Ambulatory Accelerometer Assessment (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Body Weight (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale Score (HFRDIS) (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02168062 (21) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Insulin Resistance Score (Randomized Cohort)
NCT02203331 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to Cycle 1, 2, and 3 in Percentage of Days With Pain >=4 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
NCT02203331 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to Cycle 1, 2, and 3 in Percentage of Days With Pain >=7 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
NCT02203331 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Days During Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) and Cycles 1, 2, and 3 With Pain >=4 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
NCT02203331 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Days During Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) and Cycles 1, 2, and 3 With Pain Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 7 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
NCT02203331 (7) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 1-28) and to Second Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 29-56) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
NCT02203331 (7) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Mean Pain From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment(Day1-28), Second Cycle Under Study Treatment(Day29-56),Third Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question1 of ESD
NCT02203331 (7) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
NCT02212197 (6) [back to overview]Profiles of Testesterone Concentration (ng/dL) Following Injections of the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP)
NCT02212197 (6) [back to overview]Observed Maximum Serum Leuprolide Concentration (Cmax) for Dose 1 and Dose 3
NCT02212197 (6) [back to overview]Mean Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Concentration
NCT02212197 (6) [back to overview]Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Over the Dosing Interval (AUCtau) for Dose 1 and Dose 3
NCT02212197 (6) [back to overview]Apparent Terminal Half-life (t½) for Dose 1 and Dose 3
NCT02212197 (6) [back to overview]Time (Days) to Testosterone Recovery After Dose 3
NCT02234115 (2) [back to overview]Efficacy of Leuprolide Mesylate (LMIS 50mg)
NCT02234115 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02268175 (4) [back to overview]Residual Cancer Burden (RCB)
NCT02268175 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) or Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
NCT02268175 (4) [back to overview]Participants With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)
NCT02268175 (4) [back to overview]Median Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Nadir
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Scores, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P) and Sexual Health in Men (SHIM)
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Time to Radiographic Progression
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients With PSA Progression
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Metabolic Syndrome Incidence, Summarized by the Proportion of Patients With at Least 3 of the 5 Pre-specified Criteria
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Metabolic Syndrome Incidence, Summarized by the Number of Patients With at Least 3 of the 5 Pre-specified Criteria
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events, Using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.1
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Change in Physical Function, as Measured by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Change in Markers of Inflammation, as Measured by Circulating Hs-CRP
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Change in Bone Turnover Markers, as Measured by Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Change in Bone Turnover Markers as Measured by N-telopeptide
NCT02278185 (11) [back to overview]Change in Bone Density
NCT02427958 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Regression or no Progression in Tanner Staging at Week 96
NCT02427958 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Tanner Scores: Boys - Development of External Genitalia (Change From Baseline)
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Bone Age Ratio to Chronological Age at Time of Measurement (Percent Change From Baseline)
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Tanner Scores: Boys - Development of External Genitalia
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Changes in the Ratio of LH/FSH
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Height
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Height
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Suppression of FSH, Estradiol, Oestradiol (HS), and Testosterone Measured by Blood Levels.
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Tanner Scores: Boys and Girls - Pubic Hair
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Tanner Scores: Boys and Girls - Pubic Hair (Change From Baseline)
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Tanner Scores: Girls - Breast Development
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Tanner Scores: Girls - Breast Development (Change From Baseline)
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]GnRH Antagonist Evaluation
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Changes in Height Velocity (Growth Rate)
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Suppression of Luteinizing Hormone Measured by Blood Levels.
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Peak-Stimulated Luteinizing Hormone at 6 Months.
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Bone Age
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Bone Age Progression
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Bone Age Ratio to Chronological Age at Start of Study
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Bone Age Ratio to Chronological Age at Start of Study (Percent Change From Baseline)
NCT02452931 (20) [back to overview]Bone Age Ratio to Chronological Age at Time of Measurement
NCT02508636 (17) [back to overview]Median Time to Clinical Progression
NCT02508636 (17) [back to overview]Median Time to Local Failure
NCT02508636 (17) [back to overview]Overall Median Change in EuroQol Group Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) During Treatment
NCT02508636 (17) [back to overview]Overall Median Change in Fasting Glucose Levels During Treatment
NCT02508636 (17) [back to overview]Overall Median Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Levels During Treatment
NCT02508636 (17) [back to overview]Median Time to Biochemical Failure
NCT02508636 (17) [back to overview]Overall Median Change in Lipid Levels During Treatment
NCT02508636 (17) [back to overview]Overall Median Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Levels During Treatment
NCT02508636 (17) [back to overview]Overall Median Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Fatigue Scores During Treatment
NCT02508636 (17) [back to overview]Overall Median Change in Total Cholesterol Levels During Treatment
NCT02508636 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Acute Treatment-related Toxicity
NCT02508636 (17) [back to overview]Overall Median Change in High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Levels During Treatment
NCT02508636 (17) [back to overview]Overall Median Change in EuroQol Group Five Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D) During Treatment
NCT02508636 (17) [back to overview]Overall Median Change in Score on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) During Treatment
NCT02508636 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Late Treatment-related Toxicity
NCT02508636 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Regional or Distant Metastases Over Time
NCT02508636 (17) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Achieving a Prostate Specific Antigen-Complete Response (PSA-CR)
NCT02655237 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Total PBAC Score of <10 for 6 Weeks Before the Final Dose of Study Drug
NCT02655237 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAE Related to Weight
NCT02655237 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAE Related to Standard 12-Lead ECGs
NCT02655237 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAE (Bone Density Decreased) Related to Bone Mineral Density
NCT02655237 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS-QOL)- Symptom Severity Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and Follow-up
NCT02655237 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS-QOL)- HRQL Total Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and Follow-up
NCT02655237 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and Follow up
NCT02655237 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values of Vital Signs
NCT02655237 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAE Related to Biochemical Bone Metabolism Markers
NCT02655237 (17) [back to overview]Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score
NCT02655237 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Had One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
NCT02655237 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Uterine Volumes at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24
NCT02655237 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values of Laboratory Test
NCT02655237 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Total PBAC Score of <10 From Week 6 to 12
NCT02655237 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Total PBAC Score of <10 From Week 2 to 6
NCT02655237 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Total PBAC Score of <10 From Week 18 to 24
NCT02655237 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Myoma Volumes at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Time From Randomization to Confirmed (Adjudicated) CV-related Death; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Intensity of AEs
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total and Quality of Life (QoL) Scores
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) Global Score
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ) Global Score and Score Per Domain
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Total Number of CV-related Hospitalization Events Over the Duration of the Trial
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Total Number of CV-related Emergency Room (ER) Visit Events Over the Duration of the Trial
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Total Number of Coronary Artery By-pass Grafting (CABG) or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Procedures Over the Duration of the Trial
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Unstable Angina Requiring Hospitalization; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Stroke; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Occurrence of the Composite Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Endpoint; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Occurrence of Cardiovascular (CV)-Related Death, Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction or Non-fatal Stroke; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Myocardial Infarction; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Time From Randomization to Failure in Progression-free Survival (PFS); Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Time From Randomization to Death Due to Any Cause; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Changes in Vital Signs
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Change in Utility, Based on EuroQol Group 5 Dimensions 5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
NCT02663908 (19) [back to overview]Testosterone Levels at Days 28, 168 and 336 in the Degarelix and Leuprolide Treatment Groups
NCT02716974 (3) [back to overview]Safety of the Multimodality Therapy as Assessed by Number of Participants With Neutropenia and Surgical or Radiation Toxicities
NCT02716974 (3) [back to overview]Efficacy as Assessed by 2-year PSA Progression-free Survival Rate
NCT02716974 (3) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Recurrence
NCT02770391 (6) [back to overview]PSA, FKBP5, TMPRSS2, EZH2, H3K27, and UBE2C Expression (Via IHC) in Malignant Prostate Tissue After Neoadjuvant Leuprolide and Apalutamide Based on Genotype Status.
NCT02770391 (6) [back to overview]Other Androgens Concentration in Benign Prostate Tissue After Neo-adjuvant Leuprolide and Apalutamide Based on Genotype Status.
NCT02770391 (6) [back to overview]Other Androgens (DHT, T, DHEA, Androstenediol, 5α-dione, AD, Androsterone and 5α-androstanediol) Concentration in Malignant Prostate Tissue After Neo-adjuvant Leuprolide and Apalutamide Based on Genotype Status.
NCT02770391 (6) [back to overview]Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Concentration in Benign Prostate Tissue After a Combination Drug Treatment Based on Genotype Status
NCT02770391 (6) [back to overview]PSA, FKBP5, TMPRSS2, EZH2, H3K27, and UBE2C Expression (Via qPCR) in Malignant Prostate Tissue After Neoadjuvant Leuprolide and Apalutamide Based on Genotype Status.
NCT02770391 (6) [back to overview]Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Concentration in Malignant Prostate Tissue After a Combination Drug Treatment Based on Genotype Status
NCT02807363 (5) [back to overview]Ovulation Rate - Measured by Number of Subjects With Progesterone Levels Not Less Than 3000 pg/mL
NCT02807363 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Excluding Menstrual Disorders
NCT02807363 (5) [back to overview]Steady State Concentration Level, (Css) of Leuprolide
NCT02807363 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Experienced Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Excluding Menstrual Disorders
NCT02807363 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adequacy of Suppression of Estradiol (E2) as Assessed by Estradiol Level Below 40 pg/mL
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Mean Scores for Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaires EPIC-26 at 24-months Post-RP (Part 2)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Biochemical Progression Free Survival (bPFS) Rate at 2 Years Post RP [Part 2]
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Biochemical Progression Free Survival (bPFS) Rate at 3 Years Post RP [Part 2]
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Frequency of Presenting Intra-operative Complications Following RP (Part 1)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Frequency of Presenting Intraductal Carcinoma at RP (Part 1)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Median of Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) at RP (Part 1)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Nadir PSA < 0.2 ng/mL Prior to RP (Part 1)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Rate of Freedom From Further Anti-cancer Therapy at 2-years Post RP (Part 2)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Rate of Freedom From Further Anti-cancer Therapy at 3-years Post RP (Part 2)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Rate of Freedom From Further Anti-cancer Therapy at 4-years Post RP (Part 2)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Rate of pCR at RP (Part 1)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Mean Scores for Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaires EPIC-26 at 12-months Post-RP (Part 2)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Mean Scores for Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaires EPIC-26 at 6-months Post-RP (Part 2)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Frequency of Presenting Cribriform at RP (Part 1)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Frequency of Positive Surgical Margins at RP (Part 1)
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Combined pCR or MRD Rate [Part 1]
NCT02903368 (17) [back to overview]Biochemical Progression Free Survival (bPFS) Rate at 4 Years Post RP [Part 2]
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]Canadian Sub-study: Proteomic Analysis of Ribociclib and Letrozole Cohort Not Achieving Clinical Benefit Compared to a Cohort Sensitive to Treatment With Ribociclib and Letrozole
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Based on Investigator's Assessment (Core Phase)
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]Time-to-Progression (TTP) Based on Investigator's Assessment (Core Phase)
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) Based on Investigator's Assessment (Core Phase)
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]All Collected Deaths
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) Score (Core Phase)
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) During Treatment With Ribociclib + Letrozole in the Core Phase
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs in the Extension Phase
NCT02941926 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Extension Phase)
NCT02969590 (5) [back to overview]Change in PGRMC1 During Menstrual Cycle
NCT02969590 (5) [back to overview]Median Cervical Mucus Score - Baseline
NCT02969590 (5) [back to overview]Median Cervical Mucus Score - 6 Hour
NCT02969590 (5) [back to overview]Median Cervical Mucus Score - 24 Hour
NCT02969590 (5) [back to overview]Median Cervical Mucus Score - 2 Hour
NCT02993926 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Had Regression or No Progression in Tanner Staging at the End of Follow-Up Phase
NCT02993926 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Decease of Ratio of Bone Age to Chronological Age at the End of Enantone Treatment Phase
NCT02993926 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Decease of Ratio of Bone Age to Chronological Age at the End of Follow-up Phase
NCT02993926 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Value, for Estradiol or Testosterone, Suppressed Below Upper Limit Value (ULV) at the End of Enantone Treatment Phase
NCT02993926 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Value, for Estradiol or Testosterone, Suppressed Below Upper Limit Value (ULV) at the End of Follow-Up Phase
NCT02993926 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During Follow-up Phase
NCT02993926 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During Enantone Treatment Phase
NCT02993926 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Had Regression or No Progression in Tanner Staging at the End of Enantone Treatment Phase
NCT02993926 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Post Stimulation Test Peak Values, for Luteinizing Hormone (LH) and Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH), Suppressed Below Upper Limit Value (ULV) at the End of Enantone Treatment Phase
NCT03035032 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Testosterone Levels Less Than (<) 20, 20-50 and Greater Than (>) 50 Nanogram Per Deciliter (ng/dL) at Month 12
NCT03035032 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Health Status Utility Index Score (US) at Months 6, 12 and 18
NCT03035032 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EQ-5D02-EQ-VAS Score at Months 6, 12 and 18
NCT03035032 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Eligard Related Adverse Events (AE)
NCT03035032 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥50% PSA Percent Reduction From Baseline at Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18
NCT03035032 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥90% PSA Percent Reduction From Baseline at Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18
NCT03035032 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 30% PSA Percent Reduction From Baseline at Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18
NCT03035032 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Testosterone Levels < 20, 20-50 and > 50 ng/dL at Month 18
NCT03035032 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Health Status Utility Index Score (UK) at Months 6, 12 and 18
NCT03035032 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Health State Utility Index Score (Japan) at Months 6, 12 and 18
NCT03035032 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-PR25 Score at Months 6, 12 and 18
NCT03035032 (12) [back to overview]Time to PSA Progression
NCT03043807 (1) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Recurrence
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline In Serum Concentrations Of Dihydrotestosterone
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In QoL Total Score For Urinary And Bowel Symptoms Domains As Assessed By The EORTC-QLQ-PR25
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Profound Castration Rate At Week 1 Day 4 (Day 4)
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In QoL Total Score For Remaining Domain Scores As Assessed By The EORTC-QLQ-C30
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In QoL Total Score As Assessed By The EORTC-QLQ-PR25 Sexual Activity And Functioning And Hormonal-Treatment-Related Symptom Subdomains
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Undetectable PSA Rate
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Time To Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) Of Relugolix
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Sustained Profound Castration Rate From Week 5 Day 1 Through Week 49 Day 1
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Sustained Profound Castration Rate From Week 25 Day 1 Through Week 49 Day 1
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Sustained Castration Rate
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Rate Of PSA Progression-free Survival
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]PSA Response Rate At Week 5 Day 1
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]PSA Response Rate At Week 3 Day 1
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Profound Castration Rate At Week 3 Day 1 (Day 15)
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Of Relugolix
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH) Level
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Confirmed Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In Quality Of Life (QoL) Total Score As Assessed By The Global Health Domain Of The European Organisation Of Research And Treatment Of Cancer (EORTC)-Quality Of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline In QoL Total Score As Assessed By The European Quality Of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire (EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L)
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Area Under The Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-τ) Of Relugolix
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Castration Rate At Week 1 Day 4
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Castration Rate At Week 3 Day 1
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline In Serum Concentrations Of Luteinizing Hormone
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline In Serum Concentrations Of FSH
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Testosterone Recovery Rate
NCT03085095 (27) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline In Serum Concentrations Of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin
NCT03093272 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Blood Concentration (Cmax) for Docetaxel Pharmacokinetic Analysis
NCT03093272 (5) [back to overview]Serum PSA Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks on Treatment
NCT03093272 (5) [back to overview]To Evaluate Progression-free Survival on the Combination of Docetaxel Plus Apalutamide
NCT03093272 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT03093272 (5) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Docetaxel Pharmacokinetic Analysis
NCT03209492 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Reactions
NCT03209492 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Events
NCT03209518 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Reactions
NCT03209518 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Events
NCT03261999 (2) [back to overview]Efficacy of Leuprolide Mesylate (LMIS 25mg)
NCT03261999 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT03695237 (7) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Incremental Growth Rate
NCT03695237 (7) [back to overview]Part 1: Percentage of Female Participants With Suppression of Basal Estradiol to < 20 pg/mL at Weeks 12, 20, 24, 44, and 48
NCT03695237 (7) [back to overview]Part 1: Percentage of Male Participants With Suppression of Basal Testosterone to < 30 ng/dL at Weeks 12, 20, 24, 44, and 48
NCT03695237 (7) [back to overview]Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Suppression of the Physical Signs of Puberty
NCT03695237 (7) [back to overview]Part 1: Ratio of Change From Baseline in Bone Age to Change From Baseline in Chronological Age
NCT03695237 (7) [back to overview]Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Peak GnRHa-stimulated LH to Less Than 4 mlU/mL at Weeks 12, 20, 44, and 48
NCT03695237 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Peak Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRHa)-Stimulated Luteinizing Hormone (LH) to Less Than 4 mlU/mL at Week 24
NCT04051320 (17) [back to overview]Mean Right Amygdala-medial Prefrontal Cortex BOLD Connectivity During Implicit Emotion Face Processing Task Over Time
NCT04051320 (17) [back to overview]Mean Threat Processing Bias During Visual Dot-probe Paradigm Over Time
NCT04051320 (17) [back to overview]Mean BOLD Activation of the Left Caudate During the Affective Posner Task Over Time
NCT04051320 (17) [back to overview]Correlation Between Irritability and Reactive Aggression During Hormone Addback
NCT04051320 (17) [back to overview]Correlation Between Irritability Subcortical Activation in HS+ During Hormone Addback
NCT04051320 (17) [back to overview]Correlation Between the Inventory of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) Ill -0.8Scale and Threat Attention Bias
NCT04051320 (17) [back to overview]Correlation Between the Inventory of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) Ill Temper Scale and Left Amygdala-medial Prefrontal Cortex (PFC) BOLD Connectivity.
NCT04051320 (17) [back to overview]Correlation Between the Inventory of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) Ill Temper Scale and Right Amygdala-medial Prefrontal Cortex (PFC) BOLD Connectivity.
NCT04051320 (17) [back to overview]Mean BOLD Activation of the Left Amygdala During the Affective Posner Task Over Time
NCT04051320 (17) [back to overview]Mean BOLD Activation of the Left Nucleus Accumbens During the Affective Posner Task Over Time
NCT04051320 (17) [back to overview]Mean BOLD Activation of the Left Putamen During the Affective Posner Task Over Time
NCT04051320 (17) [back to overview]Mean BOLD Activation of the Right Amygdala During the Affective Posner Task Over Time
NCT04051320 (17) [back to overview]Mean BOLD Activation of the Right Caudate During the Affective Posner Task Over Time
NCT04051320 (17) [back to overview]Mean BOLD Activation of the Right Nucleus Accumbens During the Affective Posner Task Over Time
NCT04051320 (17) [back to overview]Mean BOLD Activation of the Right Putamen During the Affective Posner Task Over Time
NCT04051320 (17) [back to overview]Mean Left Amygdala-medial Prefrontal Cortex BOLD Connectivity During Implicit Emotion Face Processing Task Over Time
NCT04051320 (17) [back to overview]Mean Reactive Aggression During Hormone Addback Over Time
NCT04225221 (10) [back to overview]Change in Response Latency to Reward During the Monetary Incentive Delay Task During Estradiol Manipulation
NCT04225221 (10) [back to overview]Change in Self-Reported Behavioral Inhibition Score During Estradiol Manipulation
NCT04225221 (10) [back to overview]Change in Weekly Average Binge-eating Frequency
NCT04225221 (10) [back to overview]Change in Behavioral Activation Score During Estradiol Manipulation
NCT04225221 (10) [back to overview]Change in Self-Reported Reward Sensitivity Subscale Score During Estradiol Manipulation
NCT04225221 (10) [back to overview]Change in Delay Discounting Parameter k Using the Monetary Choice Questionnaire With Estradiol Manipulation
NCT04225221 (10) [back to overview]Change in Binge Eating Sum Score
NCT04225221 (10) [back to overview]Change in Behavioral Inhibition During Estradiol Administration as Assessed Through a Behavioral Task
NCT04225221 (10) [back to overview]Change in Behavioral Activation Reward Responsiveness With Estradiol Manipulation
NCT04225221 (10) [back to overview]Correlation Between Change in Reward Response and Change in Binge Eating Before and During Estradiol Manipulation

Mean Beck Depression Inventory Score

"The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a 21-item, self-report rating inventory that measures the severity of symptoms accompanying depression. Each item has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 3, with higher numbers consistent with more severe symptoms. The score of each item is summed to amount the overall BDI score, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 63. Higher BDI scores are consistent with more severe depression. Score of 16 or greater is consistent with clinical depression.~Each participant completed the BDI every 2 weeks during each of the study phases throughout the 6-month study. Outcome measures reported consist of the average of two BDI scores from each phase of the study: the last 4 weeks of the GnRH agonist alone; weeks 6 and 8 of placebo alone; during the 4-week long estradiol phase (weeks 2 and 4 of estradiol) and the 4-week long progesterone phase (weeks 2 and 4 of progesterone)." (NCT00001259)
Timeframe: Placebo: Weeks 6 and 8 of Placebo; Lupron only: Weeks 6 and 8 or 10 and 12; Estradiol or progesterone: Weeks 2 and 4

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo2.6
GnRH Agonist Injections (Lupron-L Only)3.0
Estradiol5.3
Progesterone3.6

[back to top]

Mean Beck Depression Inventory Score

"The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a 21-item, self-report rating inventory that measures the severity of symptoms accompanying depression. Each item has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 3, with higher numbers consistent with more severe symptoms. The score of each item is summed to amount the overall BDI score, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 63. Higher BDI scores are consistent with more severe depression. Score of 16 or greater is consistent with clinical depression.~Each participant completed the BDI every 2 weeks during each of the study phases (i.e., GnRH agonist alone, estradiol and progesterone) throughout the 6-month study. Outcome measures reported consist of the average of two BDI scores from each phase of the study: the last 4 weeks of the GnRH agonist alone (phase 1), during the 4-week long estradiol phase (phase 2: weeks 2 and 4 of estradiol) and the 4-week long progesterone phase (phase 2: weeks 2 and 4 of progesterone)." (NCT00001322)
Timeframe: Phase 1: Weeks 6 and 8 or 10 and 12; Phase 2: Weeks 2 and 4 of estradiol or progesterone

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Phase 1 - Lupron1.4
Phase 2 - Estradiol1
Phase 2 - Progesterone1.1

[back to top]

Disease-specific Survival Rate (10 Years)

Disease-specific failure is defined as death certified as due to prostate cancer (by central review), death due to complications of treatment (irrespective of malignancy status), death from unknown causes with active malignancy, or death from unknown causes with previously documented relapse (either clinical or biochemical). Survival rates were estimated by means of cumulative incidence functions. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From registration to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy95.7
Radiation Therapy Alone92.6

[back to top]

Distant Failure Rate (10 Years)

Failure is defined as documented metastatic disease. Failure rates were estimated by means of cumulative incidence functions. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From registration to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy5.5
Radiation Therapy Alone8.0

[back to top]

Biochemical Failure Rate (10 Years)

The Phoenix definition of biochemical failure was used - an increase in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >2 ng per milliliter above the nadir. Failure rates were estimated by means of cumulative incidence functions. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From registration to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy26.3
Radiation Therapy Alone41.1

[back to top]

Clinical Relapse Rate (10 Years)

Clinical relapse is defined as local progression or distant metastases. Failure rates were estimated by means of cumulative incidence functions. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From registration to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy15.0
Radiation Therapy Alone21.7

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival Rate (10 Years)

Disease-free failure is defined as documentation of progression (local progression, distant failure, and biochemical failure) or death from any cause. Disease-free survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From registration to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy51.7
Radiation Therapy Alone39.5

[back to top]

Local Progression Rate (10 Years)

Local progression defined as documented local progression as determined by clinical exam . Failure rates were estimated by means of cumulative incidence functions. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From registration to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy10.9
Radiation Therapy Alone16.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rate (10-year)

Overall survival (OS) was calculated from randomization to the date of death from any cause and overall survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy61.9
Radiation Therapy Alone56.8

[back to top]

Positive Re-biopsy Rate at Two Years

The rate of prostate rebiopsy at two years is defined as the proportion of patients whose results are positive among all eligible patients who had a repeat biopsy at two years. The rate was estimated separately in each arm. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From registration to two years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy20.2
Radiation Therapy Alone38.9

[back to top]

Second Biochemical Relapse Rate (10 Years)

Second biochemical relapse is as defined as follows (after initiation of salvage hormone therapy): A rise in PSA on at least two consecutive cases above the nadir (after initiation of salvage hormone therapy), with the rises in PSA exceeding 1 ng/ml above the nadir; or failure to reach 4 ng/L or less at 18 months. The rates of second biochemical relapse were estimated by means of cumulative incidence functions. (NCT00002597)
Timeframe: From registration to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormone Therapy + Radiation Therapy2.7
Radiation Therapy Alone6.1

[back to top]

Quality of Life for Participants

To determine the impact of one year of total androgen ablation on quality of life mentally, physically and sexual function. The following questionnaires were completed by patients in the clinic setting and used to assess HRQoL: Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) and University of California-Los Angeles Sexual Function Scale (UCLA-SFS). To score the SF-36, scales are standardized with a scoring algorithm or by the SF-36v2 scoring software to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. (NCT00003645)
Timeframe: 1 year

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
MentalPhysicalSexual Function
Arm I - Leuprolide + Flutamide55495
Arm II - No Treatment544928

[back to top]

"Number of Wives of the Participants Having Better Than or Equal to a Good Quality of Life"

To measure the differences in quality of life between wives of participants in the androgen ablation condition compared to wives of patients in the control condition by using quality of life assessments. The following questionnaires were completed in the clinic setting and used to assess Health related (HRQoL): Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36), University of California-Los Angeles Sexual Function Scale (UCLA-SFS), and Southwest Oncology Group Treatment-Specific Symptoms Scale (SWOG-TSSS). The SF-36 was analysed using a composite score for each of physical health and mental health. SF-36, UCLA-SFS, SWOGTSSS were combined to classify participants' quality of life. (NCT00003645)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A19
Arm B24

[back to top]

The Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Here are the total number of participants with adverse events. For the detailed list of adverse events see the adverse event module. (NCT00004635)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 60 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Thalidomide117
Placebo98

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Time to progression is defined as follows: if the PSA returns to baseline (defined as the PSA value prior to starting leuprolide or goserelin) or increases to the absolute value of 5 ng/ml. (NCT00004635)
Timeframe: 36 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Thalidomide15
Placebo9.6

[back to top]

Toxicity

Patients were evaluated for acute toxicities defined as grade 3 or greater cardiovascular (including venous thrombosis), gastrointestinal, or genitourinary toxicity occurring during the period starting from treatment initiation until 90 days or less after the completion of radiotherapy. The same toxicity measures were monitored at >90 days after the completion of radiotherapy. (NCT00016913)
Timeframe: 90 days and 1 year post treatment

InterventionEvents (Number)
Grade 3+ Toxicity <=90 days post radiotherapyGrade 3+ Toxicity >90 days post radiotherapy
Neo-Adj ChemoTx + Ablation Prior to RT20

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Failure

PSA progression was defined in 2 ways. The CALGB PSA progression was defined as 2 consecutive rises in PSA with a rise of at least 0.2 ng/mL and above 1.0 ng/mL after radiation therapy; the date of PSA failure is taken as the midpoint between the last PSA before the rise and the first of the 2 PSAs that documented the rise. In addition, PSA progression was used according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology 1996 (ASTRO) criteria and defined as 3 consecutive rises in PSA after radiation therapy. The date of PSA failure was taken as the midpoint between the time of the lowest PSA measure after irradiation and the first of the 3 consecutive rises. (NCT00016913)
Timeframe: PSA was measured every 4 weeks during chemotherapy, at least every 12 weeks post radiation for 2 years, and every 6 months thereafter until PSA failure date (Up to 5.5 years).

Interventionmonths (Median)
CALGB criteriaASTRO criteria
Neo-Adj ChemoTx + Ablation Prior to RT17.112.1

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time between treatment initiation and the date of disease progression (PSA, bone, tumor) or death, whichever occurred first. PSA progression is defined as 2 consecutive rising PSAs (a rise of at least 0.2 ng/mL) above 1.0 ng/mL. (NCT00016913)
Timeframe: registration to progression, up to 5.5 years from registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Neo-Adj ChemoTx + Ablation Prior to RT12.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined from the date of registration to date of death from any cause (NCT00028769)
Timeframe: 0-5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
CAD + Chemo38

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Measured from time of registration to time of first documentation of progression determined from the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, clinical criteria, or symptomatic deterioration. PSA progression is defined as a 25% increase greater than baseline. If the patient's PSA level had decrease during the study, a 25% increase from the nadir PSA level, with absolute value of >=5 ng/mL is considered progression. CLinical progress is defined as the appearance of any new lesion at any site or death without documented progression. Symptomatic deterioration is defined as a global deterioration of the health status requiring discontinuation of treatment without objective evidence of progression. (NCT00028769)
Timeframe: 0-5 years (assessed every 3 months if no progression when the chemotherapy had been finished. Once off chemotherapy, assessed every 3 months until progression)

Interventionmonths (Median)
CAD + Chemo13

[back to top] [back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Study's primary endpoint of PFS duration/time to progression was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first evidence of disease progression or patient death. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression is usually the first evidence of progression. PSA progression is defined as a 25% increase over the baseline or the nadir provided that the increase is a minimum of 1 ng/ml. (NCT00081159)
Timeframe: Up to 90 months with evaulation in 4 week intervals for up to 6 months of treatment, then follow up until disease progression

InterventionMonths (Median)
HAT, Doxorubicin, Zoledronate + Strontium Chloride12.9
HAT, Doxorubicin + Zoledronate18.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival defined as the length of time from the start of treatment till time that participants are still alive. (NCT00081159)
Timeframe: Up to 90 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
HAT, Doxorubicin, Zoledronate + Strontium Chloride47.4
HAT, Doxorubicin + Zoledronate53.5

[back to top]

Major Bone Scan Response

Bone scan performed at baseline and at Week 13 provided if baseline scan was positive for metastases. A major bone scan response was considered with a substantial resolution of participant bone metastases on the bone scans, i.e. complete resolution of the osseous metastases on the bone scan. (NCT00081159)
Timeframe: Week 13

Interventionparticipants (Number)
HAT, Doxorubicin, Zoledronate + Strontium Chloride0
HAT, Doxorubicin + Zoledronate0

[back to top]

Percent Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment Index of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

Insulin resistance calculated from homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) equation: fasting insulin x fasting glucose / 405. Higher values indicate more insulin resistance. (NCT00123110)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Metformin-31.0
Leuprolide-8.18
Placebo4.67

[back to top]

Percent Change in Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline

(NCT00123110)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Metformin4.6
Leuprolide-96.5
Placebo-1.2

[back to top]

Percent Change in Systolic Blood Pressure

(NCT00123110)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Metformin-4.2
Leuprolide4.0
Placebo-0.3

[back to top]

Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (DHEA-S)

(NCT00123110)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Metformin2.6
Leuprolide0.9
Placebo-2.9

[back to top]

Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL)

(NCT00123110)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Metformin-10.8
Leuprolide5.3
Placebo25.3

[back to top]

Percent Change in Free Testosterone (T)

Percent change in free T by equilibrium dialysis between baseline and 12 weeks (NCT00123110)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Metformin-6.9
Leuprolide-35.8
Placebo12.1

[back to top]

Body Mass Index (BMI)

(NCT00123110)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Metformin-1.3
Leuprolide0.1
Placebo0.3

[back to top]

Change in Insulin Sensitivity

Change in insulin sensitivity (mg/kg/min) calculated from hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (NCT00123110)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionmg/kg/min (Mean)
Metformin0.44
Leuprolide0.04
Placebo-0.08

[back to top]

Number of Participants Progression-free at 18 Months

PSA progression is defined as a rise in PSA to >4.0 ng/mL demonstrated twice in measurements taken two weeks apart. (NCT00170157)
Timeframe: 18 months from the start of AA therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Entire Study Population0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Undetectable Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response

Percent of participants who had undetectable PSA at 3 months on the initially assigned treatment arm (prior to crossing over). (NCT00170157)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Androgen Ablative (AA) Therapy + MDX-01055
Androgen Ablative (AA) Then AA Therapy + MDX-01039

[back to top]

Aim 2: Mean Leptin Levels Over 24 Hours, Per Patient [Baseline]

This outcome is defined as the average concentration of leptin (a hormone produced by the fat cells that affects feeding behavior and appetite) in the blood, measured repeatedly over a 24 hour period in each patient individually. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: 15 minutes over a period of 24 hours

Interventionnanogram/milliliter (Mean)
Aim 2: PCOS + SDB With CPAP67.6
Aim 2: Matched Controls With CPAP56.9

[back to top]

Aim 3: Insulin Sensitivity Index (SI) From Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test [Baseline]

Insulin sensitivity Index (SI) is the increase in net fractional glucose clearance rate per unit change in plasma insulin concentration after an intravenous glucose load. SI quantifies the capacity of insulin to promote glucose disposal. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionmU/(liter x min) (Mean)
Aim 3: SWS Suppression8.42

[back to top]

Aim 2: Mean Leptin Levels Over 24 Hours, Per Patient [After Treatment]

This outcome is defined as the average concentration of leptin (a hormone produced by the fat cells that affects feeding behavior and appetite) in the blood, measured repeatedly over a 24 hour period in each patient individually. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: 15 minutes over a period of 24 hours

Interventionnanogram/milliliter (Mean)
Aim 2: PCOS + SDB With CPAP65.8
Aim 2: Matched Controls With CPAP57.4

[back to top]

Aim 2: Mean Cortisol Levels Over 24 Hours, Per Patient [Baseline]

This outcome is defined as the average concentration of cortisol (a glucocorticoid produced by the adrenal gland) in the blood, measured repeatedly over a 24 hour period in each patient individually. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: 10 minutes, over a period of 24 hours

Interventionmicrogram/deciliter (Mean)
Aim 2: PCOS + SDB With CPAP8.6
Aim 2: Matched Controls With CPAP6.1

[back to top]

Aim 3: Insulin Sensitivity Index (SI) From Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test [After 3 Nights of SWS Suppression]

Insulin sensitivity Index (SI) is the increase in net fractional glucose clearance rate per unit change in plasma insulin concentration after an intravenous glucose load. SI quantifies the capacity of insulin to promote glucose disposal. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: 3 nights

InterventionmU/(liter x min) (Mean)
Aim 3: SWS Suppression5.87

[back to top]

Aim 2: Insulin Sensitivity Index (SI) From Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test [After CPAP]

Insulin sensitivity Index (SI) is the increase in net fractional glucose clearance rate per unit change in plasma insulin concentration after an intravenous glucose load. SI quantifies the capacity of insulin to promote glucose disposal. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionmU/(liter x min) (Mean)
Aim 2: PCOS + SDB With CPAP0.93
Aim 2: Matched Controls With CPAP2.57

[back to top]

Aim 2: Acute Insulin Resistance to Intravenous Glucose (AIRg) [Baseline]

Acute insulin resistance to intravenous glucose (AIRg) is a measure of the secretion of insulin during the first 10 minutes after an intravenous glucose load. AIRg addresses adequacy of insulin secretion. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: baseline (0 weeks)

InterventionmU/(liter x min) (Mean)
Aim 2: PCOS + SDB With CPAP1711
Aim 2: Matched Controls With CPAP695

[back to top]

Aim 2: Acute Insulin Resistance to Intravenous Glucose (AIRg) [After CPAP]

Acute insulin resistance to intravenous glucose (AIRg) is a measure of the secretion of insulin during the first 10 minutes after an intravenous glucose load. AIRg addresses adequacy of insulin secretion. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionmU/(liter x min) (Mean)
Aim 2: PCOS + SDB With CPAP1614
Aim 2: Matched Controls With CPAP722

[back to top]

Aim 2: Mean Cortisol Levels Over 24 Hours, Per Patient [After Treatment]

This outcome is defined as the average concentration of cortisol (a glucocorticoid produced by the adrenal gland) in the blood, measured repeatedly over a 24 hour period in each patient individually. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: 10 minutes, over a period of 24 hours

Interventionmicrogram/deciliter (Mean)
Aim 2: PCOS + SDB With CPAP7.8
Aim 2: Matched Controls With CPAP6.5

[back to top]

Aim 2: Insulin Sensitivity Index (SI) From Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test [Baseline]

Insulin sensitivity Index (SI) is the increase in net fractional glucose clearance rate per unit change in plasma insulin concentration after an intravenous glucose load. SI quantifies the capacity of insulin to promote glucose disposal. (NCT00203996)
Timeframe: baseline (0 weeks)

InterventionmU/(liter x min) (Mean)
Aim 2: PCOS + SDB With CPAP0.87
Aim 2: Matched Controls With CPAP3.67

[back to top]

Change in Standardized Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Left Hip During IAS

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans were performed prior to first cycle of ADT, after completion of the first cycle of ADT, and prior to the start of the second cycle of ADT. Bone Mineral Density (BMD) was a assessed in g/cm^2 as a indicator of bone health. Percent change was assess for each patient at each time point. (NCT00223665)
Timeframe: From screening prior to first dose of ADT through the start of the second cycle of ADT.

InterventionPercent change of BMD (Number)
Post Cycle 1 versus BaselinePre Cycle 2 versus Post Cycle 1
Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS)-1.2-0.2

[back to top]

Score on Spatial Memory Testing During First Cycle of IAS

Spatial Memory was assessed at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT using the Puget Sound Route Learning Test. This test measured the ability to navigate a short route within a room. Three trials were administered followed by three trials of a new route using pictures placed on the floor as landmarks. A delayed recall is administered after twenty minutes. Performance was assessed based on number of correctly recalled sequences after a delay. (NCT00223665)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12

Interventionnumber of correctly recalled sequences (Mean)
BaselineScore at Month 3Score at Month 9Score at Month 12
Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS)19.5022.0023.7624.12

[back to top]

Score on Verbal Ability/Fluency Testing During First Cycle of IAS

Verbal Ability/Fluency was assessed at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT. Participants were asked to verbally generate as many words beginning with a particular letter (e.g. P) within a 60 second period. Two trials were administered with two different letters. The total number of words generated was recorded for each letter and summed and analyzed. (NCT00223665)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12

InterventionNumber of words generated (Mean)
BaselineScore at Month 3Score at Month 9Score at Month 12
Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS)24.6526.1526.2925.70

[back to top]

Score on Verbal Memory Testing (Proactive Interference) During First Cycle of IAS

Verbal Memory was assessed at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT via the Proactive Interference (PI) task. The PI task involves participants listening to a list of 10 words from the same semantic category (e.g., articles of clothing), and then recalling as many of these words as possible.The procedure is repeated for a total of 4 trials. Assessment is based on the total number of words recalled. (NCT00223665)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12

InterventionNumber of correctly recalled words (Mean)
BaselineScore at Month 3Score at Month 9Score at Month 12
Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS)21.3122.9022.7022.70

[back to top]

Development of Osteopenia (Bone Loss) During IAS

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans were performed prior to first cycle of ADT, after completion of the first cycle of ADT, and prior to the start of the second cycle of ADT. Bone Mineral Density (BMD) was a assessed in g/cm^2 as a indicator of bone health for each patient at each time point. This measure was defined as the percentage of participants with normal BMD scores at baseline who developed Osteopenia after the first cycle of ADT. (NCT00223665)
Timeframe: From screening prior to first dose of ADT through the start of the second cycle of ADT.

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS)13.2

[back to top]

Effect of IAS on Overall Survival.

Assessment of overall survival measured as median time from completion of first full cycle of IAS until date of death from any cause. (NCT00223665)
Timeframe: From date of first treatment until the date of death or study withdrawal, whichever came first, assessed up to 16 years.

Interventionyears (Median)
Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS)6.6

[back to top]

Time to Androgen Independence of Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)

Monthly Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) testing to assess the point at which each patient's disease stops responding to Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT). Androgen Independence (AI), also know as Castrate Resistance (CR), was defined as 2 serial rises in PSA while on ADT with Testosterone levels <50 ng/dL. (NCT00223665)
Timeframe: From date of first treatment until the date of development of CR, metastatic progression, or study withdrawal, whichever came first, assessed up to 16 years.

Interventionyears (Median)
Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS)4.0

[back to top]

Score on Verbal Memory Testing (Story Recall) During First Cycle of IAS

Verbal Memory was assessed at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT via Story Recall. This task is based on the well known Wechsler Memory Scale -Revised Logical Memory task. Participants listened to two brief narratives (stories) and were asked to recall as much as possible immediately after hearing each story and following a 20-minute delay. Assessment was based on number of correctly recalled pieces of information after a delay. (NCT00223665)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12

Interventionnumber of correctly recalled data points (Mean)
BaselineScore at Month 3Score at Month 9Score at Month 12
Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS)35.0637.8639.3841.16

[back to top]

Change in Standardized Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine During IAS

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans were performed prior to first cycle of ADT, after completion of the first cycle of ADT, and prior to the start of the second cycle of ADT. Bone Mineral Density (BMD) was a assessed in g/cm^2 as a indicator of bone health for each patient at each time point. (NCT00223665)
Timeframe: From screening prior to first dose of ADT through the start of the second cycle of ADT.

InterventionPercent change in BMD (Number)
Post Cycle 1 versus BaselinePre Cycle 2 versus Post Cycle 1
Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS)-3.41.4

[back to top]

Estradiol Levels During First Cycle of IAS

Estradiol was measured at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT. (NCT00223665)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
BaselineMeasurement at Month 3Measurement at Month 9Measurement at Month 12
Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS)33.6023.1222.7624.35

[back to top]

Score on Executive Function Testing (Stroop Task) During First Cycle of IAS

Executive Function was assessed at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT. This assessment was based on the Stroop Color Word Interference Task. Subjects are asked to read 100 color words (red, green, blue), followed by identification of color blocks followed by reading the color of the ink and ignoring the word (e.g., the word 'blue' printed in green letters). Assessment was based on the amount of time needed to time to complete the assessment. (NCT00223665)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12

Interventionminutes to complete the assessment (Mean)
BaselineScore at Month 3Score at Month 9Score at Month 12
Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS)51.0055.5247.5848.82

[back to top]

Score on Spatial Ability Test (Block Design) During First Cycle of IAS

Spatial Ability was assessed at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT. This assessment was based on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, Block Design sub-test and measures participants' ability to analyze and construct abstract figures from their component parts. The test allows a time limit of 3 minutes per design, for a total of nine designs. Score is based on total number of designs completed (max 9, min 0). (NCT00223665)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12

InterventionNumber of correctly completed designs (Mean)
BaselineScore at Month 3Score at Month 9Score at Month 12
Combined Androgen Blockade8.657.208.828.47

[back to top]

Score on Spatial Ability Test (Mental Rotation) During First Cycle of IAS

Spatial Ability (Mental Rotation) was assessed at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT. This assessment was based on the Vandenberg & Kuse (1978) Mental Rotation Test. Subjects are presented with line drawings of complex, three dimensional cubes on a computer screen. The subject must compare the two drawings and decide if they match. Score is based on number of correctly identified figures. (NCT00223665)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12

InterventionNumber of correctly identified figures (Mean)
BaselineScore at Month 3Score at Month 9Score at Month 12
Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS)16.1213.0016.5215.53

[back to top]

Score on Visual Working Memory Test During First Cycle of IAS

Visual Working Memory was assessed at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT. This task is based on the Subject Ordered Pointing Task (SOPT). The participant is shown a grid array of 10, 12 or 16 abstract designs and they must choose a new design with each refresh of the screen. Assessment is based on total number of errors. (NCT00223665)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12

Interventiontotal number of errors (Mean)
BaselineScore at Month 3Score at Month 9Score at Month 12
Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS)13.2215.6612.3514.00

[back to top]

Testosterone Levels During IAS

Testosterone was measured at baseline, and at Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12 after the start of the first cycle of ADT. (NCT00223665)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
BaselineMeasurement at Month 3Measurement at Month 9Measurement at Month 12
Intermittent Androgen Suppression (IAS)4060.280.202.45

[back to top]

Biochemical Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Measure of the activity of a treatment on a disease. In this study it is measured from the date of enrollment to the date on which the prostate cancer progresses or the date the patient dies. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. Biochemical (PSA) failure is defined, in accordance to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition, as three consecutive rise in PSA. The date of biochemical failure is considered to be the midpoint between the last non-rising PSA and the first rising PSA. (NCT00225420)
Timeframe: Average follow up of 2 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Mean)
Single Arm94

[back to top]

Number of Patients Experiencing Dose-Limiting Toxicities

Determine the number of patients experiencing dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) at each dose level. DLT was defined as grade 3-4 non-haematological or grade 4 haematological toxicity, using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. (NCT00225420)
Timeframe: Average follow up of 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Docetaxel at 10 mg/m21
Docetaxel 15 mg/m21
Docetaxel 20 mg/m20

[back to top]

Summary of Adverse Events by Grade/Relationship

Summary of adverse events( AE) collected during vaccine treatment period using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE). Grade 0-Sign/symptom within normal limits, Grade 1-Mild AE, Grade 2-Moderate AE, Grade 3-Severe AE, Grade 4- Life threatening or disabling AE. (NCT00254397)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 48 weeks during vaccine treatment

,,,
Interventionoccurences (Number)
Grade 4, Unspecified RelationshipGrade 3, PossibleGrade 3, ProbableGrade 3, UnrelatedGrade 3, Unspecified RelationshipGrade 2, DefiniteGrade 2, PossibleGrade 2, ProbableGrade 2, UnlikelyGrade 2, UnrelatedGrade 2, Unspecified RelationshipGrade 1, DefiniteGrade 1, PossibleGrade 1, ProbableGrade 1, UnlikelyGrade 1, UnrelatedGrade 1, Unspecified RelationshipGrade 0, PossibleGrade 0, ProbableGrade 0, UnlikelyGrade 0, UnrelatedGrade 0, Unspecified Relationship
gp100 - No Leuprolide0000001001146343700000
gp100 + Leuprolide0110053503821221316152912002
gp100 + MAGE-3 - No Leuprolide01011031347507456383637000013
gp100 + MAGE-3 + Leuprolide10000111932116611035325456100205

[back to top]

Number of Participants With T-cell Response to Peptide Vaccine

"Reactivity to the gp100 peptide in each participant defined as >10 tetramer positive cells per 10^4 CD8+ T-cells as determined by the tetramer analysis at 3 months following initial vaccine. Number of participants with response as defined reported.~The primary end point of this clinical study was the comparison of tumor-specific immune responses to melanoma-specific peptide vaccines, gp100 and MAGE-3 in the presence or absence of Leuprolide.~Gp209-2M/HLA-A*0201 tetramers that are commercially available employed to analyze levels of gp209-2M specific CD8+ cytolytic T cells. The levels of peptide/ HLA-A*0201 tetramer between participants' peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with Leuprolide injection and without Leuprolide injection compared." (NCT00254397)
Timeframe: At 3 months following initial vaccine.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
gp100 + Leuprolide6
gp100 - No Leuprolide1
gp100 + MAGE-3 + Leuprolide12
gp100 + MAGE-3 - No Leuprolide19

[back to top]

Most Frequent and Most Serious Participant Adverse Events During Vaccine Treatment for Overall Study

Summary of most frequent adverse events collected study wide during vaccine treatment period using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE). (NCT00254397)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 48 weeks during vaccine treatment

,
Interventionoccurences (Number)
Elevated CreatinineHyperglycemiaCardiac troponin TCardiac IschemaFatigueHypotensionRuptured lumbar discPossible Metastatic Lung NoduleCellulitisCerebral IschemiaCardiac Ischemia/stentAtrial fibrillationMultiple Allergic Reactions
gp100 + Leuprolide11111511111121
gp100 + No Leuprolide0000700000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events by Maximum Grade Within Different Arms

Maximum Grade reported for participant adverse events. collected study wide during vaccine treatment period using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE). (NCT00254397)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 48 weeks during vaccine treatment

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 4-Life threatening or disablingGrade 3-SevereGrade 2-ModerateGrade 1-Mild
gp100 - No Leuprolide0022
gp100 + Leuprolide0252
gp100 + MAGE-3 - No Leuprolide031024
gp100 + MAGE-3 + Leuprolide10217

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in TREC Per 100,000 CD8+ Cells to Final Visit in Patients Treated With LAD (11.25 mg) or Placebo After Transplant

"CD8+ cells are a type of T cell. T cells are produced in the thymus and thymic function can be determined by TREC. By counting the number of TRECs present (only 1 copy per cell) within a population of CD8+ cells, an assessment of T cell recovery and immune response is obtained. Mayo Medical Clinic. http://www.mayomedicallaboratories.com/test-catalog/Clinical+and+Interpretive/87959. Accessed 17 MARCH 2010~The change from baseline is defined as posttransplant TREC/100,000 CD8+ cells minus pretransplant TREC /100,000 CD8+ cells." (NCT00275262)
Timeframe: Pretransplant and posttransplant (Month 12)

,
InterventionTREC /100,000 CD8+ cells (Mean)
Baseline mean for TREC per 100,000 CD8+ cellsMean change in TREC from baseline to final visit
Leuprolide Acetate Depot (LAD) 11.25 mg 3 Month181.673-10.811
Placebo364.414-184.084

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in T Cell Excision Circles (TREC) Per 100,000 CD4+ Cells to Final Visit in Patients Treated With LAD (11.25 mg) or Placebo After Transplant

"CD4+ cells are a type of T cell. T cells are produced in the thymus and thymic function can be determined by TREC. By counting the number of TRECs present (only 1 copy per cell) within a population of CD4 cells, an assessment of T cell recovery and immune response is obtained. Mayo Medical Clinic. http://www.mayomedicallaboratories.com/test-catalog/Clinical+and+Interpretive/87959. Accessed 17 MARCH 2010~The change from baseline is defined as posttransplant TREC/100,000 CD4+ cells minus pretransplant TREC /100,000 CD4+ cells." (NCT00275262)
Timeframe: Pretransplant and posttransplant (Month 12)

,
InterventionTREC /100,000 CD4+ cells (Mean)
Baseline TREC per 100,000 CD4+ cellsMean change in TREC from baseline to final visit
Leuprolide Acetate Depot (LAD) 11.25 mg 3 Month67.524522.321
Placebo173.712-63.950

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Interferon Gamma Response (Spots/1 Million Cells) Before KLH Vaccination at Month 6 and After KLH Vaccination at Month 7 in Patients Who Received LAD or Placebo

Patients received a subcutaneous injection of KLH vaccine 1 month after subjects received the third injection of LAD or placebo. Interferon gamma was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot-forming cell (ELISpot). Baseline is defined as the interferon gamma concentration obtained before the KLH vaccination. Change from baseline was calculated as the interferon gamma value postvaccination minus the interferon gamma value at baseline. (NCT00275262)
Timeframe: Month 6 prevaccination (baseline) and Month 7 postvaccination

,
Interventionspots/1 million cells (Mean)
Mean interferon gamma at baselineMean interferon gamma change from baseline
Leuprolide Acetate Depot (LAD) 11.25 mg 3 Month0.22.09
Placebo-1.410.25

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IgM Response (Mcg/mL) Before Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH) Vaccination at Month 6 and After KLH Vaccination at Month 7 in Patients Who Received LAD or Placebo

Patients received a subcutaneous injection of KLH vaccine 1 month after subjects received the third injection of LAD or placebo. Serum immunoglobulin IgM antibodies were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Baseline is defined as the IgM concentration before the KLH vaccination. Change from baseline was calculated as the IgM value postvaccination minus the IgM value at prevaccination. (NCT00275262)
Timeframe: Month 6 prevaccination (baseline) and Month 7 postvaccination

,
Interventionmcg/mL (Mean)
Mean IgM at baseline (mcg/mL)Mean IgM change from baseline (mcg/mL)
Leuprolide Acetate Depot (LAD) 11.25 mg 3 Month4.02.91
Placebo3.00.57

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IgG1 Response (Mcg/mL) Before KLH Vaccination at Month 6 and After KLH Vaccination at Month 7 in Patients Who Received LAD or Placebo

Patients received a subcutaneous injection of KLH vaccine 1 month after subjects received the third injection of LAD or placebo. Serum immunoglobulin IgG1 antibodies were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Baseline is defined as the IgG1 concentration before the KLH vaccination. Change from baseline was calculated as the IgG1 value postvaccination minus the IgG1 value at baseline. (NCT00275262)
Timeframe: Month 6 prevaccination (baseline) and Month 7 postvaccination

,
Interventionmcg/mL (Mean)
Mean IgG1 at baseline (mcg/mL)Mean IgG1 change from baseline (mcg/mL)
Leuprolide Acetate Depot (LAD) 11.25 mg 3 Month8.646.16
Placebo10.816.76

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Assessment - Number of Participants With Disease Progression

"PFS is the interval from the date of surgery to date of progression. The date of progression was the earlier of~first PSA increase to ≥ 0.4 ng/mL confirmed within two weeks~date of the nadir, if PSA nadir did not reach < 0.4 ng/mL (for deferred arm)~first radiological/ histological evidence of tumor progression~death. Median PFS was to be estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. However, enrollment was not met, and meaningful conclusions for efficacy or QoL could not be drawn. Median PFS could not be estimated. Reported is the number of participants with disease progression." (NCT00283062)
Timeframe: from the date of surgery up to 3 years after randomization of the last participant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Docetaxel / Leuprolide Acetate - Immediate Treatment (I-CHT)10
Leuprolide Acetate - Immediate Treatment (I-HT)14
Docetaxel / Leuprolide Acetate - Deferred Treatment (D-CHT)9
Leuprolide Acetate - Deferred Treatment (D-HT)8

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

"Overall survival (OS) was the time interval from the date of surgery to the date of death due to any cause.~Median OS was to be estimated using Kaplan-Meier Curves. However, enrollment was not met, and meaningful conclusions for efficacy or QoL could not be drawn. Moreover, median OS could not be estimated. Reported is the number of participants who died from any cause." (NCT00283062)
Timeframe: from the date of surgery up to 3 years after randomization of the last participant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Docetaxel / Leuprolide Acetate - Immediate Treatment (I-CHT)0
Leuprolide Acetate - Immediate Treatment (I-HT)2
Docetaxel / Leuprolide Acetate - Deferred Treatment (D-CHT)1
Leuprolide Acetate - Deferred Treatment (D-HT)1

[back to top]

To Evaluate Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured Using a Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Questionnaire

"The FACT-P is a 39-item participant questionnaire which assesses physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and additional prostate cancer specific concerns (12 items). All items are scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The total FACT-P score ranges from 0-156, with higher scores representing a better QoL with fewer symptoms. A score of 156 represents the best outcome.~Note: Enrollment was not met, and meaningful conclusions for efficacy or QoL could not be drawn due to the low sample size." (NCT00283062)
Timeframe: from 30 days before randomization (baseline) and 18 months after treatment initiation (for change from baseline)

,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline (N=33, N=41, N=12, N=10)
Docetaxel / Leuprolide Acetate - Deferred Treatment (D-CHT)114.76.7
Docetaxel / Leuprolide Acetate - Immediate Treatment (I-CHT)124.00.7
Leuprolide Acetate - Deferred Treatment (D-HT)119.76.1
Leuprolide Acetate - Immediate Treatment (I-HT)121.51.7

[back to top]

Assessment of Safety and Tolerability - Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)

Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). A TEAE was as any adverse event that occurred or worsened during the on-treatment period, which was the period from the day of first infusion of study treatment until 30 days after the last infusion of study treatment. (NCT00283062)
Timeframe: from treatment initiation up to 19 months after treatment initiation

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
with any adverse event (AE)with any serious adverse event (SAE)with an SAE resulting in deathwith a drug-related AEwith a drug-related SAEwith AE leading to discontinue all study therapywith AE leading to chemotherapy discontinuationwith AE leading to chemotherapy dose reduction
Docetaxel / Leuprolide Acetate - Deferred Treatment (D-CHT)1950182112
Docetaxel / Leuprolide Acetate - Immediate Treatment (I-CHT)47120476215
Leuprolide Acetate - Deferred Treatment (D-HT)14201000NANA
Leuprolide Acetate - Immediate Treatment (I-HT)48804300NANA

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Testosterone Level <=0.5 ng/mL at Day 3

This outcome measure presents the testosterone levels 3 days after the initial dose of trial medication. (NCT00295750)
Timeframe: 3 days

Interventionpercentage of patients (Mean)
Degarelix 240/160 mg95.5
Degarelix 240/80 mg96.1
Leuprolide 7.5 mg0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Testosterone <=0.5ng/mL From Day 28 Through Day 364

Kaplan-Maier estimates of the cumulative probabilities of testosterone <=0.5 ng/mL from Day 28 to Day 364. The degarelix response rate estimation determined whether the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval for the cumulative probability of testosterone <=0.5 ng/mL from Day 28 to Day 364 was no lower than 90%. (NCT00295750)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Mean)
Degarelix 240/160 mg98.3
Degarelix 240/80 mg97.2
Leuprolide 7.5 mg96.4

[back to top]

The Mean Value of QTc Interval as Measured by Electrocardiogram

The QTc interval results are calculated with Fridericia's correction. QTc intervals are a standard evaluation of an electrocardiogram and help measure the risk of developing ventricular arrhythmias. (NCT00295750)
Timeframe: 12 months

,,
Interventionmilliseconds (Mean)
Baseline Day 0 (n=202, 207, 201)Day 3 (n=195, 204, 197)End of study 12 months (n=202, 207, 201)
Degarelix 240/160 mg403404415
Degarelix 240/80 mg407411420
Leuprolide 7.5 mg404405419

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Prostate-specific Antigen From Baseline to Day 14 and Day 28

Percentage change from Baseline to Day 14 and Day 28 in prostate-specific antigen, which is a clinically important biological marker for treatment effect and prostate cancer progression. (NCT00295750)
Timeframe: Days 14 and 28

,,
Interventionpercent change (Median)
Day 14Day 28
Degarelix 240/160 mg-64.6-82.3
Degarelix 240/80 mg-63.4-84.9
Leuprolide 7.5 mg-17.9-66.7

[back to top]

Participants With Markedly Abnormal Change in Vital Signs and Body Weight

Vital signs and body weight included incidence of markedly abnormal changes from baseline to the end of the study in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), pulse, and body weight at the end of trial as compared to baseline. The table presents the number of patients in each group with normal baseline and markedly abnormal value post-baseline. (NCT00295750)
Timeframe: 12 months

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Systolic blood pressure <=90 and decrease >=20Systolic blood pressure >=180 and increase >=20Diastolic blood pressure <=50 and decrease >=15Diastolic blood pressure >=105 and increase >=15Heart rate <=50 and decrease >=15Heart rate >=120 and increase >=15Body weight decrease of >=7 percentBody weight increase of >=7 percent
Degarelix 240/160 mg122012581524
Degarelix 240/80 mg816101370615
Leuprolide 7.5 mg62398911023

[back to top]

Participants With Markedly Abnormal Change in Laboratory Variables (>=20 Percent of Patients)

Criteria for lab values changes from baseline to the end of the study considered markedly abnormal were set for each lab test. If 20% of patients reached that value, the results were reported. (NCT00295750)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 364

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Haematocrit (<=0.37 ratio)Haemoglobin (<=115 g/L)Serum Urea Nitrogen (>=10.7 mmol/L)Urine Protein (>=2 units from baseline)Urine Bacteria (0 at baseline and >0 on treatment)
Degarelix 240/160 mg7332486596
Degarelix 240/80 mg80454164105
Leuprolide 7.5 mg73385063107

[back to top]

Participants Grouped by Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Failure

The time to prostate specific antigen failure was defined as the days from first dosing (scheduled dosing days) where an increase in serum prostate specific antigen of ≥50% from nadir and a least 5 ng/mL measured on two consecutive occasions at least two weeks apart was noted. (NCT00295750)
Timeframe: 12 months

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Day 0-28 (patients at risk=193, 201, 194)Day 0-56 (patients at risk=192, 197, 192)Day 0-84 (patients at risk=190, 193, 190)Day 0-112 (patients at risk=190, 189, 188)Day 0-140 (patients at risk=187, 187, 182)Day 0-168 (patients at risk=179, 185, 180)Day 0-196 (patients at risk=173, 181, 175)Day 0-224 (patients at risk=168, 175, 173)Day 0-252 (patients at risk=165, 169, 168)Day 0-280 (patients at risk=157, 165, 163)Day 0-308 (patients at risk=153, 161, 156)Day 0-336 (patients at risk=149, 156, 150)Day 0-364 (patients at risk=149, 155, 148)
Degarelix 240/160 mg11112711141620232626
Degarelix 240/80 mg00012447911121516
Leuprolide 7.5 mg11137911121418212426

[back to top]

Frequency and Size of Testosterone Changes at Day 255 and/or Day 259 Compared to the Testosterone Level at Day 252

Testosterone increases on Day 255 and/or on Day 259 (highest value of Day 255 and Day 259 was used) were compared with Day 252 values. Patients were categorised with shifts of <=-0.25, >-0.25-0, >0-0.25, >0.25-0.5 and >0.5 ng/mL from mean testosterone levels on Day 252. (NCT00295750)
Timeframe: Day 252, Day 255, and Day 259

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
<=-0.25 ng/mL>-0.25-0 ng/mL>0-0.25 ng/mL>0.25-0.5 ng/mL>0.5 ng/mL
Degarelix 240/160 mg1849100
Degarelix 240/80 mg3859000
Leuprolide 7.5 mg04912253

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Testosterone Surge During the First Two Weeks of Treatment

A patient was defined as having a testosterone surge if the testosterone level exceeded baseline by >=15% on any two days during the first two weeks of treatment (i.e. two of Study Days 1, 3, 7 and 14). (NCT00295750)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionpercentage of patients (Mean)
Degarelix 240/160 mg0.5
Degarelix 240/80 mg0.0
Leuprolide 7.5 mg80.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Bone Age

Bone age measured using the X-Ray of left hand and wrist. (NCT00355030)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 9 years)

,
Interventionyears (Mean)
Randomization (n=45, 43)Month 12 (n=40, 41)Month 24 (n=34, 37)Month 36 (n=18, 18)Month 48 (n=7, 8)Safety follow up 6 months (n=16, 7)Safety follow up 18 months (n=12, 3)Safety follow up 36 months (n=5, 0)Safety follow up 12 months (final height)(n=18,14)
Somatropin11.012.113.414.515.414.917.0016.3
Somatropin and Leuprorelin10.811.712.413.314.814.115.215.719.6

[back to top]

Adult Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS)

The height of the participants were measured barefoot using a standard wall-mounted Harpenden stadiometer. SDS report the number of standard deviations from the mean for age and sex for an individual measurement (normal range: -2 to +2 SDS). Height SDS is derived by subtracting the population mean from individual's height value and then dividing that difference by the population standard deviation. Greater height SDS values indicate greater height. (NCT00355030)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 9 years)

Interventionstandard deviation score (Mean)
Somatropin and Leuprorelin-1.8
Somatropin-1.9

[back to top]

Difference Between Adult Height SDS and Baseline Height SDS

"This is the difference between the gender, age and country matched standard deviation score of adult height and standard deviation score of baseline height for particular participant.~The height of the participants were measured barefoot using a standard wall-mounted Harpenden stadiometer. SDS report the number of standard deviations from the mean for age and sex for an individual measurement (normal range: -2 to +2 SDS). Height SDS is derived by subtracting the population mean from individual's height value and then dividing that difference by the population standard deviation. Greater height SDS values indicate greater height." (NCT00355030)
Timeframe: Baseline through End up Study (up to 9 years)

Interventionstandard deviation score (Mean)
Somatropin and Leuprorelin0.6
Somatropin0.6

[back to top]

Difference Between Adult Height SDS and Baseline Predicted Height SDS

"This is the difference between the gender, age and country matched standard deviation score of adult height and standard deviation score of baseline predicted height [calculated using the Bayley-Pinneau method based on height and bone age] for particular participant.~The height of the participants were measured barefoot using a standard wall-mounted Harpenden stadiometer. SDS report the number of standard deviations from the mean for age and sex for an individual measurement (normal range: -2 to +2 SDS). Height SDS is derived by subtracting the population mean from individual's height value and then dividing that difference by the population standard deviation. Greater height SDS values indicate greater height." (NCT00355030)
Timeframe: Baseline through End up Study (up to 9 years)

Interventionstandard deviation score (Mean)
Somatropin and Leuprorelin1.1
Somatropin1.2

[back to top]

Difference Between Adult Height SDS and Target Height SDS

"This is the difference between the gender, age and country matched standard deviation score of adult height and standard deviation score of target height [calculated as (mother's height (SDS) + father's height (SDS))/2] for particular participant.~The height of the participants were measured barefoot using a standard wall-mounted Harpenden stadiometer. SDS report the number of standard deviations from the mean for age and sex for an individual measurement (normal range: -2 to +2 SDS). Height SDS is derived by subtracting the population mean from individual's height value and then dividing that difference by the population standard deviation. Greater height SDS values indicate greater height." (NCT00355030)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 9 years)

Interventionstandard deviation score (Mean)
Somatropin and Leuprorelin-0.6
Somatropin-1.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Children With Normal Adult Height SDS

Percentage of children with normal adult height SDS (greater than -2 SDS and less than +2 SDS) (NCT00355030)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 9 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Somatropin and Leuprorelin26.7
Somatropin25.6

[back to top]

Height SDS

SDS report the number of standard deviations from the mean for age and sex for an individual measurement (normal range: -2 to +2 SDS). Height SDS is derived by subtracting the population mean from individual's height value and then dividing that difference by the population standard deviation. Greater height SDS values indicate greater height. (NCT00355030)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 9 years)

,
Interventionstandard deviation score (Mean)
Randomization (n=45, 43)Month 3 (n=45, 43)Month 6 (n=45, 42)Month 12 (n=44, 42)Month 18 (n=42, 42)Month 24 (n=37, 41)Month 30 (n=25, 25)Month 36 (n=18, 19)Month 42 (n=13, 14)Month 48 (n=7, 8)Month 54 (n=1, 1)Safety follow up 6 months (n=16, 9)Safety follow up 12 months(n=15, 8)Safety follow up 18 months (n=12, 4)Safety follow up 24 months (n=9, 1)Safety follow up 36 months (n=5, 0)Safety follow up 42 months (n=2, 0)Safety follow up 12 months (final height)(n=18,14)Safety follow up 24 months (final height) (n=7,10)Safety follow up 36 months (final height) (n=3,7)
Somatropin-2.5-2.4-2.2-2.0-1.9-1.8-2.0-2.0-1.9-1.9-1.7-1.7-1.7-1.9-1.200-1.8-2.0-2.2
Somatropin and Leuprorelin-2.5-2.4-2.3-2.2-2.2-2.3-2.2-2.0-1.8-1.6-1.0-2.1-1.9-1.9-1.9-1.9-2.4-1.9-1.6-1.2

[back to top]

Height Velocity

Height velocity is the difference between 2 height measurements, divided by years elapsed between measurements. (NCT00355030)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 9 years)

,
Interventioncentimeter per year (Mean)
Randomization (n=45, 43)Month 3 (n=45, 43)Month 6 (n=45, 42)Month 12 (n=44, 42)Month 18 (n=42, 42)Month 24 (n=37, 41)Month 30 (n=25, 25)Month 36 (n=18, 19)Month 42 (n=13, 14)Month 48 (n=7, 8)Month 54 (n=1, 1)Safety follow up 6 months (n=16, 9)Safety follow up 12 months(n=15, 8)Safety follow up 18 months (n=12, 4)Safety follow up 24 months (n=9, 1)Safety follow up 36 months (n=5, 0)Safety follow up 42 months (n=2, 0)Safety follow up 12 months (final height)(n=18,14)Safety follow up 24 months (final height) (n=7,10)Safety follow up 36 months (final height) (n=3,7)
Somatropin7.410.69.78.88.47.85.83.53.72.97.14.52.31.22.5000.80.30.3
Somatropin and Leuprorelin7.89.98.17.06.64.96.26.65.75.46.34.62.93.32.01.32.10.50.30.9

[back to top]

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Failures

Baseline + Post-radiation PSA levels at three month intervals for initial two years then every 6 months thereafter. Participants with a rising PSA and no evidence of local or distant recurrence considered PSA failures. (NCT00388804)
Timeframe: 3 months up to 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
RT Group 10
RT Group 2 + Hormone Therapy0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Secondary Amenorrhea Following 3-month Depot Leuprolide

Hormonal profile blood tests including follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) test, luteinizing hormone (LH) and estradiol levels done every two months with menstruation questionnaire, starting three months after the injection of the second dose of leuprolide until the restoration of spontaneous menstruation or the presence of ovarian failure. Any unexpected vaginal bleeding or side effects during the period covered by leuprolide injection, which is 6 months, is recorded by participants in a monitoring checklist sheet given to them. (NCT00429494)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Leuprolide Acetate37

[back to top]

5-year bPFS Rate

Proportion of participants surviving 5 years from randomization without biochemical progression or death. (NCT00430183)
Timeframe: 5 years

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Arm A: Docetaxel + LHRH Agonist + Surgical Intervention0.81
Arm B: Surgical Intervention0.74

[back to top]

Proportion of Biochemical Progression-Free Survival (bPFS Proportion) at 3 Years

Proportion of participants surviving 3 years from randomization without biochemical progression or death. bPFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documented biochemical progression or death. Progression will be defined as having experienced either of the following: a serum PSA level > 0.2 ng/mL that increases on 2 consecutive occasions each of which is at least 3 months apart or death occurs. The time of biochemical failure is measured from the date of randomization to the date of the first PSA level > 0.2 ng/mL. (NCT00430183)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionproportion of patients (Number)
Arm A: Docetaxel + LHRH Agonist + Surgical Intervention0.89
Arm B: Surgical Intervention0.84

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables

This outcome measure included incidence of markedly abnormal changes in safety laboratory values. The table presents the number of participants with normal baseline (from main CS21 trial, NCT00295750) and at least one post-baseline markedly abnormal value during CS21A. Only the laboratory variables that had at least five percentages of participants in either group with abnormal value are presented, more variables were included in the study. ULN=Upper limit of normal. (NCT00451958)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years of treatment

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
S-Potassium (mmol/L) >=5.8S-Alanine aminotransferase (IU/L) >3xULNS-Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L) >3xULN+25% increaseS-Creatinine (µmol/L) >=177S-Urea nitrogen (mmol/L) >=10.7B-Haematocrit (Ratio) <=0.37B-Haemoglobin (g/L) <=115B-Red blood cell count (10^12/L) <=3.5B-Eosinophils (%) >=10B-Lymphocytes (%) <=10
Degarelix 160 mg / Degarelix 160 mg9657947201579
Degarelix 80 mg / Degarelix 80 mg111412640121068
Leuprolide 7.5 mg / Degarelix 160 mg50225176315
Leuprolide 7.5 mg / Degarelix 80 mg614552295110

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From the Time of Switch From Leuprolide to Degarelix to Day 56

(NCT00451958)
Timeframe: From time of switch to Day 56

,
InterventionInternational units/Liter (IU/L) (Median)
BaselineDay 3Day 7Day 14Day 28Day 56
Leuprolide 7.5 mg/ Degarelix 240/160 mg0.0350.0350.0350.0350.0350.035
Leuprolide 7.5 mg/ Degarelix 240/80 mg0.0350.0350.0350.0350.0350.035

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Testosterone From the Time of Switch From Leuprolide to Degarelix up to Day 56

(NCT00451958)
Timeframe: From time of switch to Day 56

,
Interventionng/mL (Median)
BaselineDay 3Day 7Day 14Day 28Day 56
Leuprolide 7.5 mg/ Degarelix 240/160 mg0.0740.0680.0660.0730.0740.077
Leuprolide 7.5 mg/ Degarelix 240/80 mg0.0760.0840.0760.0850.0740.080

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight

This outcome measure included incidence of markedly abnormal changes in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), pulse, and body weight. The table presents the number of participants with normal baseline (from main CS21 study, NCT00295750) and at least one post-baseline markedly abnormal value during CS21A. (NCT00451958)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years of treatment

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Diastolic blood pressure <=50 and decrease >=15Diastolic blood pressure >=105 and increase >=15Systolic blood pressure <=90 and decrease >=20Systolic blood pressure >=180 and increase >=20Heart rate <=50 and decrease >=15Heart rate >=120 and increase >=15Body weight decrease of >=7 percentBody weight increase of >=7 percent
Degarelix 160 mg / Degarelix 160 mg66413312414
Degarelix 80 mg / Degarelix 80 mg3347411525
Leuprolide 7.5 mg / Degarelix 160 mg60342385
Leuprolide 7.5 mg / Degarelix 80 mg345771214

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With no Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression

PSA progression was defined as two consecutive increases of 50%, and at least 5 ng/mL, compared to nadir (obtained in either CS21, NCT00295750, or CS21A). The figures below present the percentage of participants with no PSA progression at each of the selected time points (there were more time points in the study) along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). (NCT00451958)
Timeframe: Until all participants have received at least 5 years of treatment and at a frequency of every 3 months

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 28Day 364Day 1960
Degarelix 160 mg / Degarelix 160 mg99.585.858.7
Degarelix 80 mg / Degarelix 80 mg10091.161.0
Leuprolide 7.5 mg / Degarelix 160 mg10087.973.8
Leuprolide 7.5 mg / Degarelix 80 mg98.682.650.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Testosterone Level Maintained at <=0.5 ng/mL From Day 28 in CS21 and Onwards

"The results below present the percentage of participants of having testosterone <=0.5 ng/mL at each of the selected time points (there were more time points in the study) from Day 28 in CS21 (NCT00295750) until the end of the CS21A study.~In all treatment groups approximately 3% per year of the participants had at least one testosterone >0.5 ng/mL during the study." (NCT00451958)
Timeframe: Until all participants have received at least 5 years of treatment and at a frequency of every 6 months

,,,
Interventionpercentage (Number)
Day 84Day 364Day 1876
Degarelix 160 mg / Degarelix 160 mg10098.387.7
Degarelix 80 mg / Degarelix 80 mg99.597.282.0
Leuprolide 7.5 mg / Degarelix 160 mg97.696.088.4
Leuprolide 7.5 mg / Degarelix 80 mg98.697.84.1

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) From the Time of Switch From Leuprolide to Degarelix to Day 56

(NCT00451958)
Timeframe: From time of switch to Day 56

,
InterventionInternational units/Liter (IU/L) (Median)
BaselineDay 3Day 7Day 14Day 28Day 56
Leuprolide 7.5 mg/ Degarelix 240/160 mg4.42.82.62.31.71.55
Leuprolide 7.5 mg/ Degarelix 240/80 mg4.82.72.62.21.81.3

[back to top]

Serum Levels of PSA From the Time of Switch From Leuprolide to Degarelix to Day 56

(NCT00451958)
Timeframe: From time of switch to Day 56

,
Interventionng/mL (Median)
BaselineDay 3Day 7Day 14Day 28Day 56
Leuprolide 7.5 mg/ Degarelix 240/160 mg0.40.30.40.30.50.4
Leuprolide 7.5 mg/ Degarelix 240/80 mg0.40.40.350.40.40.35

[back to top]

Change in Subjective Sleep Quality

Sleep quality was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; range 0-21, higher score indicates poorer quality sleep), which was administered both before and four weeks after receiving the intervention. (NCT00455689)
Timeframe: baseline (before receiving intervention) and 4 weeks after receiving intervention

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Developed Hot Flashes2.5
Did Not Develop Hot Flashes1.0

[back to top]

Percent Change in Objective Sleep Efficiency

Objective sleep efficiency was measured using actigraphy. Sleep efficiency (percent of time spent asleep between bedtime and wake time) was calculated and averaged over 2 consecutive nights both before and 4 weeks after receiving the intervention. (NCT00455689)
Timeframe: baseline (before receiving intervention) and 4 weeks after receiving intervention

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Developed Hot Flashes-2.6
Did Not Develop Hot Flashes4.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Pathological Complete Response

Probability of response, defined as pathological complete remission based on tissue obtained at surgery. Pathological Complete Response (pCR): Patients without gross or microscopic evidence of residual disease at Radical Prostatectomy defined as pCR. (NCT00500110)
Timeframe: Every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months until disease progression or death

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Total Score at End of Treatment (EOT)

FACT-P is a 39-item participant questionnaire which assesses physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and additional prostate cancer specific concerns (12 items). All items are scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The total FACT-P score ranges from 0-156, with higher scores representing a better quality of life with fewer symptoms. A score of 156 represents the best outcome. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (up to Month 18)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=206, 205)Change at EOT (n=186, 184)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide121.4-4.9
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide119.6-3.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Erectile Function Domain of International Index of Erectile Function (EF-IIEF) Total Score at EOT

EF-IIEF is a 6-item erectile function domain of IIEF. It consists of Question 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 15 of IIEF questionnaire. 5 questions are scored from 0 (no activity) to 5 (very high activity) and 1 question is scored from 1 (very low activity) to 5 (very high activity). Total EF-IIEF score ranges from 1 to 30, where higher score indicates high activity. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (up to Month 18)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=201, 205)Change at EOT (n=180, 186)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide6.4-3.1
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide6.8-3.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

TEAE: any adverse event (AE) that occurred or worsened during the on-treatment period, which was the period from first administration of study treatment until 30 days after last administration of study treatment. AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious AE: an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly, or medically important. Drug-related AEs were any untoward medical occurrences attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 3.0 Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (life threatening/disabling) TEAEs were also reported. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: From first administration of study treatment until 30 days after the last administration of study treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any TEAEAny Serious AEAny TEAE Resulting in DeathAny TEAE Leading to any Treatment DiscontinuationAny Grade 3-4 TEAEDocetaxel Related TEAELeuprolide Related TEAEBicalutamide Related TEAEAny Treatment Related TEAEAny Grade 3-4 Serious TEAEAny TEAE Leading to Interruption of any Treatment
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide1884903594183109521844377
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide163201122NA13674136141

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 36 in Testosterone Specific Evaluable Population

PFS rate at Month 36 was defined as probability of being progression-free at Month 36. PFS rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Month 36

Interventionpercent chance of being progression-free (Number)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide15.8
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide9.1

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 36 in ITT Population

PFS rate at Month 36 was defined as probability of being progression-free at Month 36. PFS rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Month 36

Interventionpercent chance of being progression-free (Number)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide15.5
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide8.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS): Number of Participants Who Died (All Cause)

The OS was the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. OS was to be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. However, the analysis was not performed due to insufficient number of events. Reported is the number of participants who died from any cause. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Randomization until death due to any cause, assessed up to Month 60

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide4
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide11

[back to top]

Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Testosterone Specific Evaluable Population

PFS was the time from randomization to the date of first documented PSA progression, or radiographic progression, or death due to prostate cancer in the absence of previous documentation of disease progression, whichever occurred first. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Randomization until PSA progression or radiographic progression or death due to prostate cancer, assessed up to Month 60

Interventionmonths (Median)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide25.7
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide24.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Index Score at EOT

MAF scale consists of 16-items to measure 4 dimensions of fatigue during past week: severity (Item 1-2), distress (Item 3), degree of interference in activities of daily living (Item 4-14), and timing (Item 15-16). Item 1-14 are scored on a numeric rating scale from 1 to 10, where higher score indicate more severity/distress/interference. Item 15-16 had multiple choice responses (4 responses each). Scale Index was calculated using Item 1-15, in following steps: 1) Item 15 score converted to 1-10 scale by multiplying the score with 2.5; 2) Average score was calculated from Item 4-14; 3) Finally scale index was calculated by adding Items 1, 2, 3 scores with average score from step 2 and converted score of Item 15 from step 1. Total MAF scale index score ranges 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (severe fatigue). (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (up to Month 18)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=168, 171)Change at EOT (n=127, 144)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide16.44.0
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide16.62.6

[back to top]

Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population

PFS was the time from randomization to the date of first documented prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression, or radiographic progression, or death due to prostate cancer in the absence of previous documentation of disease progression, whichever occurred first. PSA progression was determined as: a) During treatment period: a 50 percent (%) increase from baseline, which was confirmed by a second value; b) During follow-up: detectable PSA (defined as PSA greater than or equal to 0.05 nanogram per millimeter [ng/mL]), which was confirmed by consecutive observation (not less than 2 weeks apart). Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Randomization until PSA progression or radiographic progression or death due to prostate cancer, assessed up to Month 60

Interventionmonths (Median)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide25.4
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide23.3

[back to top]

Cancer-Specific Survival: Number of Participants Who Died (Cancer-Specific)

The cancer-specific survival was the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to prostate cancer. Cancer-specific survival was to be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. However, the analysis was not performed due to insufficient number of events. Reported is the number of participants who died from prostate cancer. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Randomization until death due to prostate cancer, assessed up to Month 60

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide2
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Score at EOT

Physical well-being, functional well-being, and prostate cancer concerns sub-scales of the FACT-P questionnaire were combined to calculate TOI. Total TOI score ranges from 0 to 104, with higher scores representing a better quality of life with fewer symptoms. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (up to Month 18)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=206, 206)Change at EOT (n=187, 187)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide82.1-5.4
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide80.4-3.1

[back to top]

Rate of Treatment Failure (no PSA Threshold Below 4 ng/dl, or no PSA Below Baseline Level Before LHRH Treatment).

Treatment failures: Count and percent of patients NOT reaching PSA concentration in serum either below 4 ng/dl or below baseline before LHRH treatment . (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: Off-treatment PSA measurement date minus on-study PSA measurement date, up to 36 weeks.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)15

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Relapse

Time from the date of the last dose of bicalutamide or the last day of radiation therapy (whichever comes later) until the date criteria are met for PSA relapse. PSA relapse after completion of initial 36 weeks of androgen deprivation therapy is defined as an increase in PSA value to above pre-therapy level, or to > 10, whichever is smaller. For example, a patient with pre-treatment PSA level of 40 will resume androgen deprivation therapy when PSA level is > 10, while a patient with pre-treatment PSA level of 3 will resume androgen deprivation therapy when PSA level is > 3. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: End-of-therapy until PSA reached pre-treatment level or 10 (whichever was lower)

Interventionmonth (Median)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)16.5

[back to top]

Count of Patients Remaining Off of Therapy

Patients who remained off of therapy, in remission, out of the number of patients with metastases limited to pelvic lymph nodes. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: after 36 week LHRH treatment window.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)7

[back to top]

CR Without ADT in Patients With Metastases Limited to Pelvic Lymph Nodes.

Number of patients remaining in complete remission without androgen deprivation therapy in patients with metastases limited to pelvic lymph nodes. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: after 36 weeks of LHRH therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)4

[back to top]

Follow-up of the 8 Patients With Metastases Limited to Pelvic Lymph Nodes.

Length of follow-up of the 8 patients with metastases limited to pelvic lymph nodes, months. Patients are followed on day one of each of three 12-week periods. After completion of therapy, patients are followed every four weeks until PSA relapse, up to 46.4 months. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: Patients are followed on day one of each of three 12-week periods. After completion of therapy, patients are followed every four weeks until PSA relapse, up to 46.4 months.

Interventionmonth (Median)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)14.7

[back to top]

Length of Follow-up

Length of follow-up in weeks to off-study date. Patients are treated for 36 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) with androgen deprivation therapy. Patients are evaluated for disease on day 1 of each of three 12-week cycles. After the last cycle of anti-androgen therapy, patients are assessed every four weeks until PSA relapse occurs, up to 264.8 weeks (61.4 months; 5.1 years). Patients will remain off-treatment until they meet the criteria for re-treatment with androgen deprivation therapy, whereupon they will be taken off of the protocol. After patients are taken off protocol, we will do a chart review for long-term outcomes. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: Patients are evaluated for disease on day 1 of each of three 12-week cycles. After the last cycle of anti-androgen therapy, patients are assessed every four weeks until PSA relapse occurs, up to 61.4 months

Interventionweek (Median)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)111.4

[back to top]

Patients Who Achieved PSA Nadir of < 0.2 at 36 Weeks.

Number of Patients who achieved PSA nadir of < 0.2 at 36 weeks. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: During the time period between on-study PSA to off-study PSA, up to 36 weeks.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)25

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Prostate Cancer (Cause-specific Mortality)

Cause-specific mortality (failure) is defined as death due to prostate cancer or complications of protocol treatment (centrally reviewed), or death following disease progression (clinical or biochemical) in the absence of or after the initiation of any salvage therapy. [Biochemical progression is indicated by any rise in PSA.] Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone2.7
PBRT + STAD1.1
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD0.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Free From Progression (FFP) at 5 Years

Progression is defined as the first occurrence of the following events: biochemical failure by the Phoenix definition (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥ 2 ng/ml over the nadir PSA), clinical failure (local, regional or distant), or death from any cause. The initiation of second salvage therapy before progression was a protocol violation and resulted in censoring. Progression time is defined as time from randomization to the date of progression, second salvage therapy (censored), or last known follow-up (censored). Freedom from progression rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but results were reported early. See Limitations and Caveats section. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to five years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone70.3
PBRT + STAD81.3
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD87.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Free From Hormone-refractory Disease (Castrate-resistant Disease)

Hormone-refractory disease (failure) is defined as three rises in PSA after the start of second salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone2.9
PBRT + STAD2.4
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD1.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Mortality)

Survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Pairwise comparisons of the overall distributions of failure times are reported in statistical analysis section, with five-year rates reported here. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone93.9
PBRT + STAD96.1
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD95.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Local Failure

Local failure is defined as first occurrence of local clinical progression. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone3.1
PBRT + STAD1.2
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD0.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events ≤ 90 Days of the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Pairwise comparisons of Arm 2 vs Arm 1 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 2 are reported in the statistical analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to 90 days after completion of radiotherapy (approximately 7-8 weeks).

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 2+Grade 3+
PBRT + STAD36.38.7
PBRT Alone18.84.4
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD43.612.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis

Distant metastasis (failure) is defined as the occurrence of distant metastasis determined by imaging. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone8.3
PBRT + STAD5.9
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD4.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Late Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events > 90 Days From the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Late adverse events (AE) are defined as occurring > 90 days from the completion of RT. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first late grade 2 or grade 3 adverse event, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times between Arm 2 and Arm 1 and between Arm 3 and Arm 2, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: AE: from 91 days after completion of RT (approximately 7-8 weeks) to last follow-up. Vital status: from randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 2+Grade 3+
PBRT + STAD54.811.4
PBRT Alone52.810.3
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD58.614.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Secondary Biochemical Failure (Alternative Biochemical Failure)

Secondary biochemical (failure) is defined as either of two occurrences: 1. For detectable post-baseline PSA values (≥ 0.1), the first occurrence of a PSA value that is both ≥ 0.4 and a second rise above nadir; 2.The start of second salvage therapy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but results were reported early. See Limitations and Caveats section. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone35.7
PBRT + STAD22.3
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD14.5

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Had a Significant Change in Immune Markers.

Immune markers were measured by isolating gamma-delta T cells one month after treatment with zoledronic acid. (NCT00582556)
Timeframe: 2 Years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Zometa Given 7 Days Prior to Beginning ADT0
Zometa Given at Month 60
Zometa Given Monthly, Months 6-110

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Decreases in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) After Zoledronic Acid Prior to Beginning Androgen Deprivation Therapy

"PSA response was measured by observing the serum PSA one week after beginning zoledronic acid and prior to beginning androgen deprivation therapy.~Arm 2 and Arm 3 were not able to be assessed for this endpoint as all subjects were on androgen deprivation prior to receiving zoledronic acid." (NCT00582556)
Timeframe: 2 Years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Zometa Given 7 Days Prior to Beginning ADT0

[back to top]

The Number of Subjects Who Had a Significant Increase of Peripheral Blood Markers of Bone Turnover.

Serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase was collected as the blood marker of bone turnover. (NCT00582556)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Zometa Given 7 Days Prior to Beginning ADT0
Zometa Given at Month 60
Zometa Given Monthly, Months 6-110

[back to top]

The Number of Subjects Who Had Either an Increase or Decrease on Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine and Femoral Neck in Men Undergoing Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Adenocarcinoma.

Effects on bone mineral density were measured at four locations at six month intervals for 24 months. (NCT00582556)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Zometa Given 7 Days Prior to Beginning ADT14
Zometa Given at Month 615
Zometa Given Monthly, Months 6-1115

[back to top]

The Effects of Testosterone Administration on Docetaxel Pharmacokinetics.

Docetaxel Pharmacokinetic parameters for cycles 1 and 2. (NCT00587431)
Timeframe: at Cycle 1 and 2

InterventionL/hr (Mean)
Docetaxel clearance (Cycle 1)Docetaxel clearance (Cycle 2)
All Participants23.923.6

[back to top]

PSA of <_ 0.05 ng/ml After Radical Prostatectomy or Radiation Therapy and PSA <_ 2.0 ng/ml for Patients With Clinical Metastases Without Prior Definitive Therapy

(NCT00587431)
Timeframe: Conclusion of the study (at 6 months then at 18 months post-treatment)

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
at 6 months post-treatmentat 18 months post-treatment
Lupron + Docetaxel (70 mg/m2) + Testosterone (Metastatic)122
Lupron + Docetaxel (75mg/m2) + Testosterone for (Metastatic)140
Lupron + Docetaxel (75mg/m2) +Testosterone (RISING PSA)90
Lupron +Docetaxel (70 mg/m2) +Testosterone (RISING PSA)133

[back to top]

Gleason Score

A Gleason score is the sum of two numbers. Pathologist determines where the cancer is most prominent and assigns the primary grade, the secondary grade is assigned based on where the cancer is next most prominent. A score from one to five is assigned for each area based on how aggressive the tumor appears. A tumor with cell that appear close to normal is assigned a low Gleason score (six or below). A tumor with cells that appear clearly different from those of a normal prostate is assigned a high Gleason score (seven or above). A system of grading prostate cancer tissue based on how it looks under a microscope. Gleason scores range from 2 to 10 and indicate how likely it is that a tumor will spread. A low Gleason score means the cancer tissue is similar to normal prostate tissue and the tumor is less likely to spread; a high Gleason score means the cancer tissue is very different from normal and the tumor is more likely to spread. (NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)8

[back to top]

Levels of DHEA in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

(NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionng/dL (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)256

[back to top]

Levels of DHEA-S in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

(NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionmcg/dL (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)90

[back to top]

Levels of DHT in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

(NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionng/dL (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)24

[back to top]

Levels of PSA in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

(NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)9.44

[back to top]

Levels of Testosterone in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

(NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionng/dL (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)319

[back to top]

Patients Who Responded to Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation

Number of patients who responded to controlled ovarian stimulation as evidenced by implantation of embryo. Implantation confirmed by ultrasound at 6 1/2 weeks of pregnancy. (NCT00621179)
Timeframe: Evaluated at 6 1/2 weeks of pregnancy which is 4 weeks post embryo transfer.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 17
Group 25
Group 33
Group 45

[back to top]

Adjusted Percentage of Subjects With Suppression of Serum Testosterone (<=50 ng/dL) From Week 4 to Week 48 for Formulation A: ITT Population for the Primary Endpoint Adjusted

The adjusted percentage of subjects with testosterone suppression (<= 50 ng/dL) from Week 4 to Week 48 was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method for right-censored observations. The primary efficacy analysis was adjusted to censor subjects who received an anti-androgen at the last testosterone measurement before use of the anti-androgen. One additional subject was censored because of a laboratory error, at the last measurement before the error. The adjusted 90% 2-sided confidence interval was calculated from Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT00626431)
Timeframe: Week 4 to Week 48

InterventionPercent Suppressed (Number)
Leuprolide Acetate - Formulation A93.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Suppression of Serum Testosterone (<=50 ng/dL) From Week 4 to Week 48 for Formulation B: ITT Population for the Primary Endpoint Preplanned

The percentage of subjects with testosterone suppression (<= 50 ng/dL) from Week 4 to Week 48 was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method for right-censored observations. Subjects who failed testosterone suppression were considered failures on the first day of a testosterone measurement (>50 ng/dL). Subjects who prematurely discontinued without escaping and those who were successfully suppressed through Week 48 were censored at their last measured testosterone value (Day 337 to Day 340 at Week 48). The 90% 2-sided confidence interval was calculated from Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT00626431)
Timeframe: Week 4 to Week 48

InterventionPercent suppressed (Number)
Leuprolide Acetate - Formulation B86.9

[back to top]

Mean (+/- Standard Error) Acute-on-chronic Changes in Luteinizing Hormone From Pre-injection Levels for Formulation A: ITT Population

The acute-on-chronic effect is an agonistic stimulation of luteinizing hormone after the second depot injection of Formulation A. The mean +/- standard error changes were measured to assess this effect from just before to 2 weeks after the second injection. (NCT00626431)
Timeframe: Week 24 before the second injection until 2 weeks after Week 24 (2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3-10 d, and 11-17 d postdose)

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Testosterone concentration at 2 hours postdoseTestosterone concentration at 4 hours postdoseTestosterone concentration at 8 hours postdoseTestosterone concentration at Day 1 postdoseTestosterone concentration at Day 2 postdoseTestosterone concentration at Days 3-10 postdoseTestosterone concentration at Days 11-17 postdose
Leuprolide Acetate - Formulation A0.20.20.20.20.10.10.1

[back to top]

Mean Testosterone Concentration (+/- Standard Error) at Each Visit for Formulation B: ITT Population

Baseline was the last measurement before the first dose of Formulation B. The mean +/- standard error was calculated at each visit. The final visit occurred at Week 48 unless the subject prematurely discontinued the study. (NCT00626431)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 2 and 8, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 14, 20, 24, 26, 30, 34, 40, 46, 48, and Final Visit

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Testosterone concentration at baselineTestosterone concentration at Day 2Testosterone concentration at Day 8Testosterone concentration at Week 2Testosterone concentration at Week 4Testosterone concentration at Week 8Testosterone concentration at Week 14Testosterone concentration at Week 20Testosterone concentration at Week 24Testosterone concentration at Week 26Testosterone concentration at Week 30Testosterone concentration at Week 34Testosterone concentration at Week 40Testosterone concentration at Week 46Testosterone concentration at Week 48/Final Visit
Leuprolide Acetate - Formulation B414.0578.0466.9127.415.39.18.99.628.015.69.49.79.59.413.8

[back to top]

Mean (+/- Standard Error) Acute-on-chronic Changes in Luteinizing Hormone From Pre-injection Levels for Formulation B: ITT Population

The acute-on-chronic effect is an agonistic stimulation of luteinizing hormone after the second depot injection of Formulation B. The mean +/- standard error changes were measured to assess this effect from just before to 2 weeks after the second injection. (NCT00626431)
Timeframe: Week 24 before the second injection until 2 weeks after Week 24 (2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3-10 d, and 11-17 d postdose)

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Testosterone concentration at 2 hours postdoseTestosterone concentration at 4 hours postdoseTestosterone concentration at 8 hours postdoseTestosterone concentration at Day 1 postdoseTestosterone concentration at Day 2 postdoseTestosterone concentration at Days 3-10 postdoseTestosterone concentration at Days 11-17 postdose
Leuprolide Acetate - Formulation B0.40.50.40.40.20.1-0.1

[back to top]

Mean (+/- Standard Error) Acute-on-chronic Changes in Testosterone From Pre-injection Levels for Formulation A: ITT Population

The acute-on-chronic effect is an agonistic stimulation of serum testosterone after the second depot injection of Formulation A. The mean +/- standard error changes were measured to assess this effect from just before to 2 weeks after the second injection. (NCT00626431)
Timeframe: Week 24 before the second injection until 2 weeks after Week 24 (2 hours [h], 4 h, 8 h, 1 day [d], 2 d, 3-10 d, and 11-17 d postdose)

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Testosterone concentration at 2 hours postdoseTestosterone concentration at 4 hours postdoseTestosterone concentration at 8 hours postdoseTestosterone concentration at Day 1 postdoseTestosterone concentration at Day 2 postdoseTestosterone concentration at Days 3-10 postdoseTestosterone concentration at Days 11-17 postdose
Leuprolide Acetate - Formulation A-1.9-1.2-1.3-0.1-0.1-1.0-2.1

[back to top]

Mean (+/- Standard Error) Acute-on-chronic Changes in Testosterone From Pre-injection Levels for Formulation B: ITT Population

The acute-on-chronic effect is an agonistic stimulation of serum testosterone after the second depot injection of Formulation B. The mean +/- standard error changes were measured to assess this effect from just before to 2 weeks after the second injection. (NCT00626431)
Timeframe: Week 24 before the second injection until 2 weeks after Week 24 (2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3-10 d, and 11-17 d postdose)

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Testosterone concentration at 2 hours postdoseTestosterone concentration at 4 hours postdoseTestosterone concentration at 8 hours postdoseTestosterone concentration at Day 1 postdoseTestosterone concentration at Day 2 postdoseTestosterone concentration at Days 3-10 postdoseTestosterone concentration at Day 11-17 postdose
Leuprolide Acetate - Formulation B-0.71.63.68.07.84.5-4.2

[back to top]

Mean (+/- Standard Error) Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) at Baseline, Visits Throughout the Study, and at Final Visit for Formulation A: ITT Population

PSA levels were measured at baseline and each treatment visit for Formulation A. The mean (+/- standard error) was calculated at each visit. The final visit occurred at Week 48 unless the subject prematurely discontinued the study. (NCT00626431)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 8, Week 14, Week 24, Week 30, Week 40, Week 48, and the Final Visit

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
PSA concentration at baselinePSA Concentration at Day 8PSA Concentration at Week 14PSA Concentration at Week 24PSA Concentration at Week 30PSA Concentration at Week 40PSA Concentration at Week 48/Final Visit
Leuprolide Acetate - Formulation A35.040.42.42.91.62.23.7

[back to top]

Mean (+/- Standard Error) Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) at Baseline, Visits Throughout the Study, and at Final Visit for Formulation B: ITT Population

PSA levels were measured at baseline and each treatment visit for Formulation B. The mean (+/- standard error) was calculated at each visit. The final visit occurred at Week 48 unless the subject prematurely discontinued the study. (NCT00626431)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 8, Week 14, Week 24, Week 30, Week 40, Week 48, and the Final Visit

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
PSA concentration at baselinePSA Concentration at Day 8PSA Concentration at Week 14PSA Concentration at Week 24PSA Concentration at Week 30PSA Concentration at Week 40PSA Concentration at Week 48/Final Visit
Leuprolide Acetate - Formulation B20.523.12.42.52.72.56.2

[back to top]

Mean Testosterone Concentration (+/- Standard Error) at Each Visit for Formulation A: ITT Population

Baseline was the last measurement before the first dose of Formulation A. The mean +/- standard error was calculated at each visit. The final visit occurred at Week 48 unless the subject prematurely discontinued the study. (NCT00626431)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 2 and 8, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 14, 20, 24, 26, 30, 34, 40, 46, 48, and Final Visit

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Testosterone concentration at baselineTestosterone concentration at Day 2Testosterone concentration at Day 8Testosterone concentration at Week 2Testosterone concentration at Week 4Testosterone concentration at Week 8Testosterone concentration at Week 14Testosterone concentration at Week 20Testosterone concentration at Week 24Testosterone concentration at Week 26Testosterone concentration at Week 30Testosterone concentration at Week 34Testosterone concentration at Week 40Testosterone concentration at Week 46Testosterone concentration at Week 48/Final Visit
Leuprolide Acetate - Formulation A432.9613.1468.2127.116.09.69.28.514.39.09.913.08.88.813.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Suppression of Serum Testosterone (<=50 ng/dL) From Week 4 to Week 48 for Formulation A: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population for the Primary Endpoint.

The percentage of subjects with testosterone suppression (<= 50 ng/dL) from Week 4 to Week 48 was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method for right-censored observations. Subjects who failed testosterone suppression were considered failures on the first day of a testosterone measurement (>50 ng/dL). Subjects who prematurely discontinued without escaping and those who were successfully suppressed through Week 48 were censored at their last measured testosterone value (Day 337 to Day 340 at Week 48). The 90% 2-sided confidence interval was calculated from Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT00626431)
Timeframe: Week 4 to Week 48

InterventionPercent Suppressed (Number)
Leuprolide Acetate - Formulation A93.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Testosterone in <30 ng/dL by Visit

Percentage of participants with suppression of testosterone, out of the number of boys with at least 1 testosterone measurement at each visit (n/N%). Only boys are analyzed in this outcome measure. Observed data were used with no imputation for missing data. (NCT00635817)
Timeframe: Month 1, 2, 3 and 6

,,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Mo 1 (Arm A N=2, B N=1, C N=2, D N=3)Mo 2 (Arm A N=2, B N=1, C N=2, D N=3)Mo 3 (Arm A N=2, B N=1, C N=2, D N=3)Mo 6 (Arm A N=1, B N=1, C N=2, D N=3)
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Previous Treatment100100100100
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Treatment Naive50.050.050.0100
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Previous Treatment100100100100
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Treatment Naive100100100100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Basal Estradiol <20 pg/mL by Visit

Percentage of participants with suppression of estradiol, out of the number of girls with at least 1 estradiol measurement at each visit (n/N%). Only girls are analyzed in this outcome measure. Observed data were used with no imputation for missing data. (NCT00635817)
Timeframe: Month 1, 2, 3 and 6

,,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Mo 1 (Arm A N=17, B N=18, C N=19, D N=16)Mo 2 (Arm A N=19, B N=14, C N=19, D N=14)Mo 3 (Arm A N=15, B N=18, C N=17, D N=18)Mo 6 (Arm A N=12, B N=16, C N=15, D N=17)
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Previous Treatment10010010093.8
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Treatment Naive10094.7100100
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Previous Treatment100100100100
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Treatment Naive100100100100

[back to top]

Peak-stimulated Luteinizing Hormone Concentration by Visit

Observed data were used with no imputation for missing data. (NCT00635817)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 2, 3 and 6

,,,
InterventionmIU/mL (Mean)
Baseline (Arm A N=21, B N=21, C N=21, D N=21)Mo 1 (Arm A N=21, B N=21, C N=21, D N=21)Mo 2 (Arm A N=21, B N=20, C N=21, D N=20)Mo 3 (Arm A N=16, B N=20, C N=20, D N=21)Mo 6 (Arm A N=15, B N=18, C N=18, D N=21)
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Previous Treatment1.81.72.01.82.5
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Treatment Naive45.94.44.52.32.0
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Previous Treatment1.71.41.51.51.5
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Treatment Naive23.51.92.01.41.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Incremental Growth Rate (cm/Year) at Month 6

The growth rate at baseline was the growth rate during the last year before the start of treatment and was calculated with the measurement closest to Day -336 (before Day -30) and the measurement up to Day 1. Growth rate at Month 6 was defined as the ratio of the change in height from Day 1 to the change in chronological age, with an approximate 6-month interval between the 2 height measurements. Observed data were used with no imputation for missing data. (NCT00635817)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

,,,
Interventioncm/year (Mean)
Baseline (Arm A N=20, B N=21, C N=21, D N=21)Mo 6 (Arm A N=14, B N=19, C N=19, D N=21)
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Previous Treatment6.58-0.98
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Treatment Naive7.25-2.51
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Previous Treatment6.05-0.91
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Treatment Naive7.83-2.34

[back to top]

Ratio of Change From Baseline in Bone Age/Change From Baseline in Chronological Age at Month 6

The ratio at Month 6 was calculated as (bone age at Month 6 - bone age at baseline)/(chronological age at Month 6 - chronological age at baseline). Observed data were used with no imputation for missing data. Baseline bone-age radiograph was performed at or within 3 months of the Screening Visit. (NCT00635817)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 6

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Treatment Naive0.59
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Previous Treatment0.50
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Treatment Naive1.00
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Previous Treatment1.07

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Suppression of the Physical Signs of Puberty (Testicular Volume and Genital Development) at Month 6

Percentage of participants with suppression of genital development and testicular volume, out of the number of boys with pubertal staging of genital development or testicular volume (n/N%). Only boys are analyzed in this outcome measure. External genital development (testes and penis) was rated from Stage 1 (early development) through Stage 5 (full development) according to a Tanner Staging pictogram. Boys entering the study with fully developed genitals (Stage 5) were excluded from this analysis. Observed data were used with no imputation for missing data. (NCT00635817)
Timeframe: Month 6

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Treatment Naive100
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Previous Treatment0
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Treatment Naive50
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Previous Treatment33.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Suppression of the Physical Signs of Puberty (Breast Development) at Month 6

Percentage of participants with suppression of breast development, out of the number of girls with pubertal staging of breast development (n/N%). Only girls are analyzed in this outcome measure. Breast development was rated from Stage 1 (early development) through Stage 5 (full development) according to a Tanner Staging pictogram. Girls entering the study with fully developed breasts (Stage 5) were excluded from this analysis. Observed data were used with no imputation for missing data. (NCT00635817)
Timeframe: Month 6

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Treatment Naive92.9
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Previous Treatment88.9
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Treatment Naive82.4
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Previous Treatment82.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Peak Stimulated Luteinizing Hormone (<4 mIU/mL) From Month 2 Through Month 6

Percentage of participants with suppression of peak stimulated luteinizing hormone that was measured after a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) stimulation test at Month (Mo) 2, 3, and 6. The analysis was performed according to a life table method. Subjects who withdrew without peak-stimulated luteinizing hormone >= 4 mIU/mL were censored at their last measurement of peak-stimulated luteinizing hormone. (NCT00635817)
Timeframe: Month 2 through 6

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Treatment Naive76.2
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Previous Treatment80.7
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Treatment Naive90.5
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Previous Treatment100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Decrease From Baseline in the Ratio of Bone Age to Chronological Age at Month 6 Compared to Baseline

The ratio at baseline or Month 6 was calculated as bone age at baseline or Month 6/chronological age at baseline or Month 6. The percentage of participants with a decrease in the ratio was calculated as a simple percentage for each dose group. Observed data were used with no imputation for missing data. The baseline time frame was increased from the secondary outcome in this analysis to include all participants with a bone age radiograph at screening. This analysis was performed after the clinical study report was completed & is included to match the FDA package insert. (NCT00635817)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 6

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg87.9
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg75.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Peak Stimulated Luteinizing Hormone (< 4 mIU/mL) From Month 2 Through Month 6 (Simple Percentage With Binomial Exact Confidence Intervals)

Percentage of participants with suppression of peak stimulated luteinizing hormone that was measured after a GnRHa stimulation test at Mo 2, 3, and 6. A simple percentage and binomial exact confidence intervals were used in this analysis. Participants who withdrew with luteinizing hormone that remained suppressed were counted as a success. This analysis was performed after the clinical study report was completed and is included to match the FDA package insert. (NCT00635817)
Timeframe: Month 2 through 6

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Treatment Naive76.2
Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 mg - Previous Treatment81.0
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Treatment Naive90.5
Leuprolide Acetate 30 mg - Previous Treatment100.0

[back to top]

Mean Stimulated Testosterone Concentrations in Males

Mean stimulated testosterone concentrations were assessed according to the DELFIA (registered trademark) assay. The final visit for measurement of testosterone occurred at a mean age +/- SD of 12.34 +/- 1.16 (range, 11.14 to 14.07) years. (NCT00660010)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48 (Year 1), yearly for 5 years (Week 240), and Final Visit

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Mean stimulated testosterone at baseline N=6Mean stimulated testosterone at Week 4 N=6Mean stimulated testosterone at Week 12 N=6Mean stimulated testosterone at Week 24 N=6Mean stimulated testosterone at Week 48 N=6Mean stimulated testosterone at Week 96 N=6Mean stimulated testosterone at Week 144 N=5Mean stimulated testosterone at Week 192 N=4Mean stimulated testosterone at Week 240 N=3Mean stimulated testosterone at Final Visit N=6
Leuprolide Acetate 1 Month Depot347.718.014.213.817.324.821.624.025.324.2

[back to top]

Mean Time to or Mean Age at Regular Menses in Females After Treatment

Regular menses was defined as 3 or more consecutive days of menstrual-like bleeding and was defined by the investigator's clinical judgment. (NCT00660010)
Timeframe: Posttreatment during the follow-up period (subjects observed every 6 months until physical and laboratory observations are at pubertal levels)

Interventionyears (Mean)
Time to regular mensesAge at regular menses
Leuprolide Acetate 1 Month Depot1.512.9

[back to top]

Number of Female Subjects Who Reported Regular Menses at Adulthood

Subjects were required to complete final adult questionnaire to provide information on adult reproductive function. Regular menses was defined as 3 or more consecutive days of menstrual-like bleeding. (NCT00660010)
Timeframe: Posttreatment data were collected from the final adult questionnaire (subjects >= 18 years of age)

InterventionSubjects (Number)
No. of subjects with regular menses as adultsNo. of subjects without regular menses as adults
Leuprolide Acetate 1 Month Depot164

[back to top]

Number of Pregnancies Reported by Subjects at Final Questionnaire

The final questionnaire was completed by 20 female subjects who were at least 18 years of age. The total number of pregnancies were reported. (NCT00660010)
Timeframe: Posttreatment data were collected from the final adult questionnaire (subjects >= 18 years of age)

InterventionPregnancies (Number)
Number of pregnanciesNumber of live birthsNumber of miscarriages
Leuprolide Acetate 1 Month Depot1265

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Reported Pregnancies at Final Questionnaire

The final questionnaire was completed by 20 females who were at least 18 years of age. The subjects reported on total number of pregnancies resulting in live births or number of miscarriages (spontaneous or elective) and whether the subject was currently pregnant. (NCT00660010)
Timeframe: Posttreatment data were collected from the final adult questionnaire (subjects >= 18 years of age)

InterventionSubjects (Number)
Number of subjects who reported being pregnantNumber of subjects who were currently pregnant
Leuprolide Acetate 1 Month Depot71

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects (n/N) With Suppression of Clinical Sexual Characteristics According to Tanner Staging (Breast Development in Females)

Suppression of clinical sexual characteristics was defined as regression (improvement) or no progression of breast development in females. Tanner staging is a scale of physical development that defines primary and secondary sex characteristics including size of breasts. The final visit occurred at a mean age +/- SD of 11.05 +/- 1.14 years (range, 6.96 to 12.95 years). (NCT00660010)
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 48 (Year 1), yearly for 5 years (Week 240), and Final Visit

InterventionPercentage of subjects (Number)
Breast development suppression - Week 4 N=44Breast development suppression-Week 48 N=47Breast development suppression -Week 96 N=41Breast development suppression-Week 144 N=29Breast development suppression - Week 192 N=18Breast development suppression -Week 240 N=13Breast development suppression-Final Visit N=48
Leuprolide Acetate 1 Month Depot81.880.987.882.866.776.977.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects (n/N) With Suppression of Clinical Sexual Characteristics According to Tanner Staging (Genital Development in Males)

Suppression of clinical sexual characteristics was defined as regression (improvement) or no progression of genital development in males. Tanner staging is a scale of physical development that defines primary and secondary sex characteristics including size of genitals. The final visit occurred at a mean age +/- SD of 12.35 +/-1.35 years (range, 10.71 to 14.07 years). (NCT00660010)
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 48 (Year 1), yearly for 5 years (Week 240), and Final Visit

InterventionPercentage of subjects (Number)
Genital development suppression - Week 4 N=5Genital development suppression - Week 48 N=6Genital development suppression - Week 96 N=6Genital development suppression - Week 144 N=4Genital development suppression - Week 192 N=4Genital development suppression - Week 240 N=3Genital development suppression - Final Visit N=6
Leuprolide Acetate 1 Month Depot80.083.383.375.075.066.783.3

[back to top]

Posttreatment Height (ht.) Compared to Standard Population and as Predicted From Ht. at Baseline (BL)

Height was measured by stadiometer and was standardized for age according to standard growth charts. A standardized score of 0 indicated a mean ht. equivalent to mean of a standard population from 2000 CDC standardized ht. charts. Height gain was calculated as ht. - predicted ht. from the Bayley-Pinneau method on the basis of bone age at baseline. Final adult ht. was determined by measurement at final adult ht., if available, or by ht. collected during the follow-up period associated with a growth velocity <1 cm/year or a bone age >14 yrs in females or >15 yrs in males. (NCT00660010)
Timeframe: Final ht. (measured or provided for final questionnaire in subjects >= 18 years of age) or near final adult ht. (<1 cm/year or bone age > 14 years for females or > 15 years for males)

Interventioncm (Mean)
Near final adult ht. standardized score N=33Near final ht.gain from predicted ht. at BL N=29Final adult ht.standardized score N=19Final adult ht.gain from predicted ht. at BL N=17
Leuprolide Acetate 1 Month Depot-0.23.20.03.9

[back to top]

Mean Peak Stimulated Luteinizing Hormone (LH) and Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Concentrations

Mean peak stimulated visit LH and FSH concentrations were assessed according to the DELFIA (registered trademark) assay. The final visit for measurement of both hormone concentrations occurred at a mean age +/- SD of 11.13 +/- 1.23 (range, 6.73 to 14.07) years. (NCT00660010)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48 (Year 1), yearly for 5 years (Week 240), and Final Visit

InterventionmIU/mL (Mean)
Peak stimulated LH at Baseline N=55Peak stimulated LH at Week 4 N = 55Peak stimulated LH at Week 12 N = 54Peak stimulated LH at Week 24 N = 53Peak stimulated LH at Week 48 N = 54Peak stimulated LH at Week 96 N = 46Peak stimulated LH at Week 144 N = 36Peak stimulated LH at Week 192 N = 20Peak stimulated LH at Week 240 N = 17Peak stimulated LH at Final Visit N = 55Peak stimulated FSH at Baseline N=55Peak stimulated FSH at Week 4 N = 55Peak stimulated FSH at Week 12 N = 54Peak stimulated FSH at Week 24 N = 53Peak stimulated FSH at Week 48 N = 54Peak stimulated FSH at Week 96 N = 46Peak stimulated FSH at Week 144 N = 36Peak stimulated FSH at Week 192 N = 20Peak stimulated FSH at Week 240 N = 17Peak stimulated FSH at Final Visit N = 55
Leuprolide Acetate 1 Month Depot35.00.81.10.80.60.40.40.40.40.813.30.91.11.21.21.41.41.31.41.7

[back to top]

Mean Ratio of Bone Age to Chronological Age

Bone age was determined by radiography of the wrist according to the Fels Method. The mean ratio of bone age to chronological age provides information about the slowing of bone age progression. A score = 1 indicates that bone age is equal to chronological age. (NCT00660010)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 48 (Year 1), yearly for 5 years (Week 240), and Final Visit

Interventionratio (Mean)
Ratio at Baseline N=53Ratio at Week 24 N=53Ratio at Week 48 N=51Ratio at Week 96 N=44Ratio at Week 144 N=31Ratio at Week 192 N=26Ratio at Week 240 N=16Ratio at Final Visit N=53
Leuprolide Acetate 1 Month Depot1.51.51.41.31.21.21.21.2

[back to top]

Mean Stimulated Estradiol Concentrations in Females

Mean estradiol concentrations were assessed according to the DELFIA (registered trademark) assay. The lower limit of quantitation for estradiol is 5 pg/mL and measurements below this limit are given a value of 5 pg/mL. The final visit for measurement estradiol concentrations occurred at a mean age +/- SD of 10.93 +/- 1.27 (range, 5.59 to 13.24) years. (NCT00660010)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48 (Year 1), yearly for 5 years (Week 240), and Final Visit

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Mean stimulated estradiol at baseline N=49Mean stimulated estradiol at Week 4 N=48Mean stimulated estradiol at Week 12 N=47Mean stimulated estradiol at Week 24 N=47Mean stimulated estradiol at Week 48 N=47Mean stimulated estradiol at Week 96 N=39Mean stimulated estradiol at Week 144 N=31Mean stimulated estradiol at Week 192 N=15Mean stimulated estradiol at Week 240 N=13Mean stimulated estradiol at Final Visit N=49
Leuprolide Acetate 1 Month Depot15.35.06.05.05.05.05.05.05.05.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Growth Rate

Baseline growth rate was the growth rate in the one year prior to Day 1 of the lead-in study L-CP07-167. Growth rates were calculated as the ratio of the change in height to the change in chronological age with an approximate 6-month interval for Day 1, Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and the Final Treatment Visit. (NCT00667446)
Timeframe: Baseline (the 1 year prior to the start of treatment in the lead-in study), and Day 1, Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36

,
Interventioncm/year (Mean)
Baseline [N=32, 38]Change from Baseline at Day 1 [N=32, 38]Change from Baseline at Month 6 [N=32, 37]Change from Baseline at Month 12 [N=28, 32]Change from Baseline at Month 18 [N=18, 23]Change from Baseline at Month 24 [N=15, 19]Change from Baseline at Month 30 [N=11, 17]Change from Baseline at Month 36 [N=8, 13]Change from Baseline at Final Visit [N=32, 38]
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 11.25 mg7.2-1.67-1.66-1.99-2.21-2.36-1.86-2.64-2.27
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 30 mg7.53-1.65-2.04-2.28-2.06-1.59-2.13-2.19-2.64

[back to top]

Mean Peak-stimulated Luteinizing Hormone Concentration by Visit

Peak-stimulated luteinizing hormone refers to the maximum luteinizing hormone concentration measured 30 and 60 minutes after a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) stimulation test. Final visit is the participant's last visit closest to Month 36. (NCT00667446)
Timeframe: Baseline of the lead-in study L-CP07-167, Day 1, Months 6, 12, 24, and 36

,
InterventionmIU/mL (Mean)
Baseline [N=33, 38]Day 1 [N=32, 37]Month 6 [N=32, 36]Month 12 [N=31, 32]Month 24 [N=14, 18]Month 36 [N=7, 11]Final Visit [N=33, 36]
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 11.25 mg21.892.002.222.241.671.511.81
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 30 mg10.161.491.621.580.880.911.15

[back to top]

Percentage of Female Participants With Suppression of Basal Estradiol (Assay 1)

"The percentage of female participants with suppression of basal estradiol to prepubertal levels, defined as estradiol < 20 pg/mL.~The estradiol assay was changed in June of 2010, and the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was increased from 1 pg/mL to 10 pg/mL. This outcome measure reports data for assays performed before this change occurred, with an LLOQ of 1 pg/mL. Final visit is the participant's last visit closest to Month 36." (NCT00667446)
Timeframe: Day 1, Months 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 [N=28, 30]Month 3 [N=29, 33]Month 6 [N=26, 25]Month 9 [N=18, 18]Month 12 [N=10, 12]Month 24 [N=1, 0]Final Visit [N=31, 33]
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 11.25 mg96.4100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 30 mg100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0NA100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Female Participants With Suppression of Basal Estradiol (Assay 2)

"The percentage of female participants with suppression of basal estradiol to prepubertal levels, defined as estradiol < 20 pg/mL.~The estradiol assay was changed in June of 2010, and the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was increased from 1 pg/mL to 10 pg/mL. This outcome measure reports data for assays performed after this change occurred, with an LLOQ of 10 pg/mL. Final visit is the participant's last visit closest to Month 36." (NCT00667446)
Timeframe: Months 6, 9, 12, 24, 30, and 36

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 6 [N=4, 6]Month 9 [N=13, 10]Month 12 [N=20, 15]Month 24 [N=14, 15]Month 30 [N=9, 15]Month 36 [N=7, 11]Final Visit [N=24, 26]
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 11.25 mg100.061.545.050.033.328.629.2
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 30 mg83.340.060.053.326.736.430.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Female Participants With Suppression of the Physical Signs of Puberty (Breast Development)

The percentage of female participants with suppression of breast development. Breast development was rated from Stage 1 (early development) through Stage 5 (full development) according to a modified Tanner Staging pictogram. Suppression of breast development is defined as regression or no progression of breast development from Baseline (of the lead-in study L-CP07-167) according to pubertal staging. Girls entering the study with fully developed breasts (Stage 5) were excluded from this analysis. Final visit is the participant's last visit closest to Month 36. (NCT00667446)
Timeframe: Baseline (of the lead-in study L-CP07-167), Day 1, Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 [N= 31, 31]Month 3 [N=29, 31]Month 6 [N=31, 30]Month 9 [N=31, 28]Month 12 [N=28, 26]Month 18 [N=17, 20]Month 24 [N=14, 16]Month 30 [N=10, 16]Month 36 [N=8, 12]Final Visit [N=31, 31]
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 11.25 mg90.386.290.387.185.782.478.690.087.583.9
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 30 mg83.987.180.075.080.875.075.068.866.771.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Male Participants With Suppression of Basal Testosterone

The percentage of male participants with suppression of basal testosterone to prepubertal levels, defined as testosterone < 30 ng/dL. Final visit is the participant's last visit closest to Month 36. (NCT00667446)
Timeframe: Day 1, Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 30, and 36

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 [N= 2, 5]Month 3 [N=2, 5]Month 6 [N=2, 5]Month 9 [N=2, 5]Month 12 [N=1, 5]Month 24 [N=1, 3]Month 30 [N=0, 1]Month 36 [N=0, 1]Final Visit [N=2, 5]
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 11.25 mg100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0NANA100.0
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 30 mg100.0100.080.080.0100.066.7100.0100.0100.0

[back to top]

Ratio of Change From Baseline in Bone Age/Change From Baseline in Chronological Age

"Bone age was determined by left hand/wrist bone age radiographs that were evaluated using the Fels Method by a central reader. The ratio of change from Baseline in bone age (BA)/change from Baseline in chronological age (CA) was calculated using the following formula:~(BA at Post-baseline Treatment Visit - BA at Baseline) / (CA at Post-baseline Treatment Visit - CA at Baseline)." (NCT00667446)
Timeframe: Baseline (of the lead-in study L-CP07-167), and Day 1, Months 12, 24, and 36

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Day 1 [N=32, 37]Month 12 [N=32, 32]Month 24 [N=14, 17]Month 36 [N=5, 11]Final Visit [N=33, 32]
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 11.25 mg0.510.520.530.430.48
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 30 mg1.020.620.720.640.56

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Peak-Stimulated Luteinizing Hormone

Luteinizing Hormone (LH) suppression is defined as peak-stimulated LH < 4 mIU/mL. Peak-stimulated LH refers to the maximum LH concentration measured 30 and 60 minutes after a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) stimulation test. Participants who failed suppression at previous visit and prematurely discontinued were counted as having failed future visits also. Final visit is the participant's last visit closest to Month 36. (NCT00667446)
Timeframe: Day 1, Months 6, 12, 24, and 36

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 [N= 32, 37]Month 6 [N=32, 36]Month 12 [N=31, 32]Month 24 [N=16, 18]Month 36 [N=9, 11]Final Visit [N=33, 36]
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 11.25 mg96.993.890.387.577.893.9
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 30 mg100.0100.096.9100.0100.0100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Male Participants With Suppression of the Physical Signs of Puberty (Testicular Volume and Genital Development)

The percentage of male participants with suppression of testicular volume and genital staging. Testicular volume was calculated from the length, width and height of each testicle measured by ultrasound. External genital development (testes and penis) was rated from Stage 1 (early development) through Stage 5 (full development) according to a modified Tanner Staging pictogram. Suppression is defined as regression or no progression in both testicular volume and genital staging from Baseline (of the lead-in study L-CP07-167) according to pubertal staging. Boys entering the study with fully developed genitals (Stage 5) were excluded from this analysis. Final visit is the participant's last visit closest to Month 36. (NCT00667446)
Timeframe: Baseline (of the lead-in study L-CP07-167), Day 1, Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 [N= 2, 5]Month 3 [N=2, 5]Month 6 [N=2, 5]Month 9 [N=2, 5]Month 12 [N=1, 5]Month 18 [N=1, 3]Month 24 [N=1, 3]Month 30 [N=1, 1]Month 36 [N=0, 1]Final Visit [N=2, 5]
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 11.25 mg50.050.050.050.0100.0100.0100.0100.0NA50.0
Leuprolide Acetate 3M Depot 30 mg40.060.060.040.060.0100.033.3100.0100.020.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Can Safely Tolerate and Complete Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy, Radiation Therapy and Docetaxel After a Radical Prostatectomy

Defined as percentage of patients that complete full dose of Radiation Therapy (RT) (NCT00669162)
Timeframe: 8 Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
RT, Docetaxel, Hormonal Therapy26

[back to top]

Fat Mass

Total body fat mass measured by DXA (NCT00687739)
Timeframe: Before and after 5 months of treatment

Interventionkg (Mean)
GnRHag+PL0.5
GnRHag+PL+ex-0.6
GnRHag+E20.4
GnRHag+E2+ex-0.8

[back to top]

Fat-free Mass

Total body fat-free mass measured by DXA (NCT00687739)
Timeframe: Before and after 5 months of treatment

Interventionkg (Mean)
GnRHag+PL-1.0
GnRHag+PL+ex0.1
GnRHag+E20.0
GnRHag+E2+ex1.0

[back to top]

Resting Energy Expenditure (REE)

Resting energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimeter at baseline and after 5 months of treatment. (NCT00687739)
Timeframe: Before and after 5 months of treatment

Interventionkcal/d (Mean)
GnRHag+PL-37.8
GnRHag+PL+ex-87.2
GnRHag+E214.6
GnRHag+E2+ex-19.3

[back to top]

Total Energy Expenditure (TEE)

24-hour energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry in a room calorimeter (NCT00687739)
Timeframe: Before and after 5 months of treatment

Interventionkcal/d (Mean)
GnRHag+PL-108.8
GnRHag+PL+ex-166.5
GnRHag+E2-92.7
GnRHag+E2+Ex-107.4

[back to top]

Cortisol Response (Area Under the Curve) to CRH Under DEX Suppression

Cortisol response to corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) during dexamethasone (DEX) suppression; DEX/CRH stimulation test (NCT00687739)
Timeframe: Before and after 5 months of treatment

Interventionng/mL x min (Mean)
GnRHag+PL189
GnRHag+E2-3115

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Reduction of Uterine Bleeding at Week 13 Visit Defined as Pictorial Blood-loss Assessment Chart (PBAC) Score < 75 at End-of-treatment Visit (Week 13 Visit)

"Uterine bleeding was assessed with the use of the PBAC, a validated self-reporting method to estimate menstrual blood loss.~Patients recorded daily the number of tampons and towels used and the degree to which individual items were soiled with blood (plus small or large clots). Monthly scores range from 0 (amenorrhea) to more than 500, with higher numbers indicating more bleeding.~A slightly stained tampon/towel scores 1, a partially stained tampon/towel scores 5, a completely saturated tampon scores 10 and a completely saturated towel scores 20. Small clots/flooding (2cm) score 1. Large clots/flooding (3cm) score 5.~Menorrhagia is defined as a PBAC > 100 during one menstrual period which approximates to a blood loss of > 80 mL. A PBAC of 400 corresponds to a blood loss of around 300 mL or approximately 80 tampons/towels used.~The week 13 PBAC score was calculated using the last 28 days of treatment." (NCT00740831)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
A (PGL4001 5mg)90.3
B (PGL4001 10mg)97.9
C (GnRH-agonist)89.1

[back to top]

Change in the Total Volume of the Three Largest Myomas From Baseline to Week 13

"Assessment of PGL4001 capacity to decrease volume of the three largest myomas was performed at each center by means of ultrasonography at baseline and at week 13.~The total volume of the three largest myomas assessed at screening and at end-of-treatment visit (Week 13) was analysed on a logarithm transformed scale (to base 10)." (NCT00740831)
Timeframe: 3 months

InterventionLog 10 (Log cm3) Total volume (Mean)
A (PGL4001 5mg)-0.179
B (PGL4001 10mg)-0.220
C (GnRH-agonist)-0.268

[back to top]

Co-primary Safety Endpoint: % of Subjects Reporting Moderate or Severe Hot Flushes as Adverse Events Throughout the Treatment Period for PGL4001 Compared With GnRH-agonist

"Difference in percentage of subjects reporting moderate or severe hot flushes:~Frequency and severity of this adverse event(as spontaneously reported by patients or elicited by nonleading questions) were recorded on standard forms at every visit up to week 17." (NCT00740831)
Timeframe: Up to week 17

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
A (PGL4001 5mg)11.3
B (PGL4001 10mg)9.7
C (GnRH-agonist)39.6

[back to top]

Co-primary Safety Endpoint: Serum Estradiol Levels at End of Treatment Visit (Week 13 Visit) for PGL4001 Compared With GnRHagonist

Measured by log 10 (log pg/ml) transformed values for estradiol (E2) in blood samples (NCT00740831)
Timeframe: Week 13 visit

Interventionlog 10 (log pg/ml) E2 (Mean)
A (PGL4001 5mg)1.897
B (PGL4001 10mg)1.843
C (GnRH-agonist)1.381

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain CPSSS Component

"The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration.~To assess non-menstrual pelvic pain, participants were asked to select the best description of pelvic pain over the past 28 days using the following response categories:~0 = Absent; No discomfort.~1 = Mild; Occasional pelvic discomfort that can be treated with NSAIDs.~2 = Moderate; Noticeable discomfort or pain for most of cycle requiring regular use of NSAID or weak opiate.~3 = Severe; Pain persisting during the cycle or pain requiring strong analgesics." (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.60
Elagolix 150 mg-0.58
Elagolix 250 mg-0.48
Leuprorelin-0.79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum N-telopeptide Concentration at Week 12

Blood samples to determine N-telopeptide concentrations were analyzed by a central laboratory using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

InterventionnM bone collagen equivalents (BCE) (Mean)
Placebo0.62
Elagolix 150 mg0.77
Elagolix 250 mg2.04
Leuprorelin3.18

[back to top]

Number of Days to First Posttreatment Menses

Defined as the number of days from the last dose of study drug until the start date of the first post-treatment menses. (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: From last day of study drug up to 6 weeks after the last dose.

Interventiondays (Median)
Elagolix 150 mg22.5
Elagolix 250 mg26.0
Placebo / Elagolix 150 mg26.0
Placebo / Elagolix 250 mg27.0
Leuprorelin / Elagolix 150 mg29.0
Leuprorelin / Elagolix 250 mg28.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 12

Bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur (total hip) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Placebo-0.90
Elagolix 150 mg-0.342
Elagolix 250 mg-0.5623
Leuprorelin-1.122

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24

Bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur (total hip) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Elagolix 150 mg-0.549
Elagolix 250 mg-0.699
Placebo / Elagolix 150 mg-0.126
Placebo / Elagolix 250 mg-0.573
Leuprorelin / Elagolix 150 mg-1.784
Leuprorelin / Elagolix 250 mg-1.783

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 12

Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Placebo0.106
Elagolix 150 mg-1.053
Elagolix 250 mg-0.799
Leuprorelin-1.633

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24

Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Elagolix 150 mg-1.288
Elagolix 250 mg-1.855
Placebo / Elagolix 150 mg-0.990
Placebo / Elagolix 250 mg-0.648
Leuprorelin / Elagolix 150 mg-2.899
Leuprorelin / Elagolix 250 mg-4.378

[back to top]

Average Number of Hot Flashes Per Day

"Hot flashes, if any, were reported daily by participants during the study using the e-Diary.~The average number of hot flashes per day was calculated for each participant as the total number of hot flashes divided by total days in the phase." (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Screening (8 weeks prior to day 1), Treatment phase (weeks 1 to 12 for participants in the placebo and leuprorelin treatment groups and weeks 1 to 24 for participants in the elagolix treatment groups)

,,,
Interventionhot flashes per day (Median)
ScreeningTreatment Phase
Elagolix 150 mg0.000.22
Elagolix 250 mg0.001.10
Leuprorelin0.001.73
Placebo0.000.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS)

"The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration.~To assess dyspareunia (painful intercourse) participants were asked to select the best description of pain during sexual intercourse over the past 28 days using the following response categories:~0 = Absent; No discomfort during sexual intercourse.~1 = Mild; I can tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse.~2 = Moderate; Intercourse is sometime interrupted due to pain.~3 = Severe; I prefer to avoid intercourse because of pain.~Not applicable. I am not sexually active for reasons other than my endometriosis symptoms." (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Elagolix 150 mg-0.46-0.68-0.84
Elagolix 250 mg-0.49-0.77-0.89
Leuprorelin-0.55-0.76-1.04
Placebo-0.33-0.72-0.60

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score

"Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day of their period in an e-Diary according to the following response options:~Subject is not having her period~0 = No pain related to period~1 = Mild pain related to period; subject could not do some of the things she usually does~2 = Moderate pain related to period; subject could not do many of the things she usually does~3 = Severe pain related to period; subject could not do most of or all of the things she usually does.~The monthly mean dysmenorrhea score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit." (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Elagolix 150 mg-0.64-0.86-0.76
Elagolix 250 mg-0.67-1.04-0.87
Leuprorelin-0.65-1.22-1.14
Placebo-0.17-0.40-0.35

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score

"Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options:~0 = No pelvic pain~1 = Mild pelvic pain; subject could not do some of the things she usually does~2 = Moderate pelvic pain; subject could not do many of the things she usually does~3 = Severe pelvic pain; subject could not do most or all of the things she usually does.~The monthly mean non-menstrual pelvic pain score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit." (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Elagolix 150 mg-0.22-0.34-0.35
Elagolix 250 mg-0.21-0.36-0.34
Leuprorelin-0.27-0.46-0.55
Placebo-0.05-0.18-0.30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain

"The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day.~The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit." (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Elagolix 150 mg-0.84-1.25-1.34
Elagolix 250 mg-1.00-1.57-1.47
Leuprorelin-0.94-1.55-1.81
Placebo-0.35-0.93-1.22

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Sum of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores

"Participants assessed dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain not related to menses and their impact on daily activities at approximately the same time every day on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe) in an e-Diary. The dysmenorrhea scale included an option for participants who were not having their period.~The sum of the dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores on each day were calculated to create a daily total score. On days the participant was not having her period, the dysmenorrhea score was not defined; hence, the total score was equal to the non-menstrual pelvic pain score (range 0 to 3). On days where the participant recorded menstruation the total score ranged from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. The monthly mean sum of dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit." (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Elagolix 150 mg-0.43-0.58-0.55
Elagolix 250 mg-0.44-0.67-0.63
Leuprorelin-0.50-0.78-0.87
Placebo-0.12-0.24-0.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain

"The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day.~The monthly peak NRS is the maximum of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit." (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Elagolix 150 mg-1.82-2.23-2.62
Elagolix 250 mg-1.83-2.96-3.05
Leuprorelin-1.48-3.62-3.99
Placebo-0.20-0.89-1.67

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use

"The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic.~The percentage of days of any analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of an analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none)." (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12

,,,
Interventionpercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Elagolix 150 mg-1.1-3.4-4.4
Elagolix 250 mg-8.4-9.1-8.3
Leuprorelin-8.7-10.2-10.5
Placebo-5.2-6.2-6.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use

"The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic.~The percentage of days of narcotic analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a narcotic analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none)." (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12

,,,
Interventionpercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Elagolix 150 mg-0.1-0.10.1
Elagolix 250 mg0.0-0.10.1
Leuprorelin-0.1-0.10.3
Placebo0.0-0.10.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use

"The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic.~The percentage of days of prescription analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a prescription analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none)." (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12

,,,
Interventionpercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Elagolix 150 mg3.41.30.7
Elagolix 250 mg-1.2-2.8-1.9
Leuprorelin-2.5-2.6-2.8
Placebo-0.3-1.3-1.8

[back to top]

Concentration of Serum Estradiol

The concentration of serum estradiol (E2) was quantified using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrophotometry (LC/MS/MS). Serum estradiol concentrations below the limit of quantification (BLQ) were set equal to the lower limit of quantification (2.5 pg/mL). (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

,,,
Interventionpg/mL (Median)
BaselineWeek 4Week 8Week 12
Elagolix 150 mg43.4036.4036.9036.70
Elagolix 250 mg47.5022.0023.6526.20
Leuprorelin46.203.634.366.38
Placebo39.1049.5061.0087.90

[back to top]

Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12

"The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories:~Very Much Improved~Much Improved~Minimally Improved~Not Changed~Minimally Worse~Much Worse~Very Much Worse" (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Elagolix 150 mg3.02.52.4
Elagolix 250 mg2.92.22.2
Leuprorelin3.32.32.1
Placebo3.42.82.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Days With Uterine Bleeding

"Uterine bleeding was reported daily by participants during the study using the e-Diary.~The percentage of days a participant reported any bleeding was calculated as the total number of days the participant reported any bleeding ( light, moderate, or heavy) divided by the total number of days the participant had a non-missing eDiary report of vaginal bleeding in the phase." (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Screening (8 weeks prior to day 1), Treatment phase (weeks 1 to 12 for participants in the placebo and leuprorelin treatment groups and weeks 1 to 24 for participants in the elagolix treatment groups)

,,,
Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
ScreeningTreatment Phase
Elagolix 150 mg18.3210.78
Elagolix 250 mg22.329.54
Leuprorelin21.0511.04
Placebo21.1021.46

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much Improved

"The PGIC is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories:~Very Much Improved~Much Improved~Minimally Improved~Not Changed~Minimally Worse~Much Worse~Very Much Worse" (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Elagolix 150 mg74.481.488.1
Elagolix 250 mg65.190.788.4
Leuprorelin50.088.693.2
Placebo56.175.680.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved

"The PGIC is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories:~Very Much Improved~Much Improved~Minimally Improved~Not Changed~Minimally Worse~Much Worse~Very Much Worse" (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Elagolix 150 mg25.653.554.8
Elagolix 250 mg32.672.167.4
Leuprorelin27.354.570.5
Placebo7.336.653.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12

"The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts:~A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image with five response categories for each item (Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always)~A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions which assess the areas of work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession, treatment, and infertility with the same five response categories plus an additional response category of Not Relevant which was not scored.~The scores associated with each possible outcome category are as follows: never (0), rarely (25), sometimes (50), often (75), and always (100). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life." (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PainControl and PowerlessnessEmotional WellbeingSocial SupportSelf-imageWorkRelationship with ChildrenSexual IntercourseMedical ProfessionFrustration with TreatmentConcerns with Infertility
Elagolix 150 mg-19.0-17.9-10.7-16.1-7.7-21.5-15.3-21.2-5.5-10.9-24.0
Elagolix 250 mg-25.0-20.9-12.8-18.6-5.8-29.9-25.0-30.6-7.6-7.6-13.8
Leuprorelin-31.8-23.9-13.6-15.3-8.5-38.6-22.9-28.9-6.3-12.5-13.3
Placebo-14.0-18.3-14.6-22.0-12.2-23.7-11.5-32.2-5.3-11.4-19.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS

"The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration.~To assess dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation), participants were asked to select the best description of painful menstruation over the past 28 days using the following response categories:~0 = Absent; Amenorrhea (no bleeding) or no discomfort.~1 = Mild; Some loss of work efficiency; occasional use of analgesics.~2 = Moderate; In bed part of one day, occasional loss of work; regular use of analgesics.~3 = Severe; In bed ≥ 1 day, incapacitation; requirement for strong analgesics." (NCT00797225)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.03
Elagolix 150 mg-1.29
Elagolix 250 mg-1.47
Leuprorelin-1.75

[back to top]

Percentage of Oocytes Fertilized of the Total Number of Oocytes Retrieved

The fertilization rate for each participant was the percentage of the number of oocytes inseminated of the total number of oocytes retrieved. (NCT00805935)
Timeframe: approximately day 19

InterventionPercentage of oocytes retrieved (Number)
Menotropin17.1
Follitropin Beta24.8

[back to top]

Number of Follicles Observed at Day 15

The mean number of follicles observed in both ovaries at the last transvaginal ultrasound in the stimulation phase. (NCT00805935)
Timeframe: approximately day 15

InterventionFollicles (Mean)
Menotropin27.7
Follitropin Beta30.5

[back to top]

Number of Oocytes Retrieved at Day 18

The mean number of oocytes retrieved approximately 36 hours after hCG (Novarel®) administration and fertilized (by insemination or intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)) according to site-specific procedures. (NCT00805935)
Timeframe: approximately day 18

InterventionOocytes (Mean)
Menotropin13.0
Follitropin Beta15.6

[back to top]

Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

"Number of participants with adverse events (AEs) that started after first treatment. Severity used a three point scale:~mild=awareness of signs/symptoms, but no disruption of usual activity moderate=event sufficient to affect usual activity (disturbing) severe=event causes inability to work or perform usual activities (unacceptable) Relatedness to study treatment used a four point scale: unrelated, unlikely, possible, probable.~Seriousness refers to death, hospitalization, a life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or congenital anomaly." (NCT00805935)
Timeframe: Week 1 to week12

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
With at least one adverse eventWith at least one mild or moderate adverse eventWith at least one severe adverse eventWith at least one serious adverse eventWith at least one unrelated or unlikely AEWith at least one possibly or probably related AE
Follitropin Beta/Progesterone in Oil141400136
Follitropin Beta/Progesterone Vaginal Insert151510128
Menotropin/Progesterone in Oil121121117
Menotropin/Progesterone Vaginal Insert990083

[back to top]

Participants With Cycle Cancellation Due to Risk of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS) Between Weeks 1 - 3

A count of participants whose discontinuation was clearly documented on the study completion/termination form as cycle cancellation for risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). (NCT00805935)
Timeframe: weeks 1-3

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
YesNo
Follitropin Beta/Progesterone in Oil030
Follitropin Beta/Progesterone Vaginal Insert127
Menotropin/Progesterone in Oil027
Menotropin/Progesterone Vaginal Insert124

[back to top]

Number of Embryos Transferred at Three Stages of Development Before Implantation

"The number of embryos, morulas and blastocysts transferred to the study participant on either day 3 or day 5 following fertilization. Embryos represent the earliest development stage and contain 2-8 cells.~Morulas, the next stage, continued cellular cleavage results in a 16-30 cell solid sphere. Morula further develop into blastocyst, which contains 70-100 cells in a hollow spherical shape." (NCT00805935)
Timeframe: approximately day 24

,
InterventionEmbryos (Mean)
Number of embryos transferredNumber of morula transferredNumber of blastocyst transferred
Follitropin Beta2.00.11.1
Menotropin2.00.00.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Ongoing Pregnancy at Week 9

Clinical pregnancy is the confirmation of the presence of intrauterine gestational sacs on pregnancy ultrasound examination. (NCT00805935)
Timeframe: approximately Day 65

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Menotropin/Progesterone Vaginal Insert48.0
Menotropin/Progesterone in Oil33.3
Follitropin Beta/Progesterone Vaginal Insert46.4
Follitropin Beta/Progesterone in Oil63.3

[back to top]

Progesterone Levels at Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) Administration

Blood tests were sent to a central laboratory to obtain progesterone levels. (NCT00805935)
Timeframe: approximately day 16

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Menotropin/Progesterone Vaginal Insert1.3
Menotropin/Progesterone in Oil1.1
Follitropin Beta/Progesterone Vaginal Insert1.7
Follitropin Beta/Progesterone in Oil1.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Pregnancy at Approximately Day 38

Biochemical pregnancy is a positive β-hCG pregnancy test 12-14 days post embryo transfer. (NCT00805935)
Timeframe: approximately day 38 (Day 14 post embryo transfer)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Menotropin/Progesterone Vaginal Insert60.0
Menotropin/Progesterone in Oil55.6
Follitropin Beta/Progesterone Vaginal Insert60.7
Follitropin Beta/Progesterone in Oil73.3

[back to top]

Estradiol Levels at Day 6

Estradiol monitoring during fertility therapy assesses follicular growth and is useful in monitoring the treatment. Blood tests sent to a central laboratory to obtain estradiol levels. (NCT00805935)
Timeframe: Day 6

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Menotropin/Progesterone Vaginal Insert354.6
Menotropin/Progesterone in Oil268.2
Follitropin Beta/Progesterone Vaginal Insert617.5
Follitropin Beta/Progesterone in Oil550.5

[back to top]

Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) Levels at Day 6

Blood tests were sent to a central laboratory to obtain hCG levels. (NCT00805935)
Timeframe: Day 6

InterventionmIU/ml (Mean)
Menotropin/Progesterone Vaginal Insert1.0
Menotropin/Progesterone in Oil1.0
Follitropin Beta/Progesterone Vaginal Insert1.0
Follitropin Beta/Progesterone in Oil1.0

[back to top]

Number of Embryos Frozen

The number of embryos that were not transferred but instead were frozen for future use. (NCT00805935)
Timeframe: approximately day 24

InterventionEmbryos (Mean)
Menotropin1.9
Follitropin Beta1.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Pregnancy at Week 7

Clinical pregnancy is the confirmation of the presence of intrauterine gestational sacs on pregnancy ultrasound examination. (NCT00805935)
Timeframe: approximately Day 52

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Menotropin/Progesterone Vaginal Insert56.0
Menotropin/Progesterone in Oil33.3
Follitropin Beta/Progesterone Vaginal Insert46.4
Follitropin Beta/Progesterone in Oil66.7

[back to top]

Tolerability at One Year of Ovarian Function Suppression (OFS) Using Leuprolide and Letrozole.

The tolerability at one year of ovarian function suppression (OFS) using leuprolide and letrozole in this patient population. Specifically, the number of patients who discontinued treatment prior to one year due to toxicity. (NCT00903162)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Letrozole-Leuprolide4

[back to top]

Androstenedione and Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) Concentrations in Prostate Tissue

Androstenedione is a steroid (a group of polycyclic compounds closely related biochemically to terpenes, for example, cholesterol, numerous hormones), that is produced in the testis, ovary and the adrenal cortex, and depending on the tissue type, androstenedione can serve as a precursor to testosterone, estrone and estradiol. The DHEA is a major steroid produced by the adrenal cortex. It is also produced in small quantities in the testis and the ovary. Androstenedione and DHEA concentration was measured in prostate tissues at Week 12 and 24. (NCT00924469)
Timeframe: Week 12 and 24

,
InterventionPicogram per milligram (pg/mg) (Mean)
Androstenedione: Week 12 (n=28,27)Androstenedione: Week 24 (n=28,26)DHEA: Week 12 (n=28,27)DHEA: Week 24 (n=28,26)
Abiraterone Plus Leuprolide Plus Prednisone0.0820.0901.9943.138
Leuprolide Then Abiraterone Plus Leuprolide Plus Prednisone0.2770.07029.2412.170

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response

The PSA response was evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criterion which is, percentage of participants with PSA less than or equal to 0.2 nanogram/milliliter at Weeks 12 and 24 after androgen deprivation. (NCT00924469)
Timeframe: Weeks 12 and 24

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 24
Abiraterone Plus Leuprolide Plus Prednisone86.786.7
Leuprolide Then Abiraterone Plus Leuprolide Plus Prednisone3.682.1

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Androgens

Serum concentrations of testosterone, DHT, androsterone, DHEA, DHEA-Sulfate, DHEA-Glucuronide and delta-4-androstenedione were measured at Weeks 12 and 24. (NCT00924469)
Timeframe: Week 12 and 24

,
InterventionNanogram per deciliter (ng/dL) (Mean)
Testosterone: Week 12 (n=28,28)Testosterone: Week 24 (n=25,25)DHT: Week 12 (n=28,28)DHT: Week 24 (n=26,26)Androsterone: Week 12 (n=28,28)Androsterone: Week 24 (26,26)DHEA: Week 12 (n=28,28)DHEA: Week 24 (n=26,26)DHEA-Glucuronide: Week 12 (n=29,28)DHEA-Glucuronide: Week 24 (n=27,27)DHEA-Sulfate: Week 12 (n=28,28)DHEA-Sulfate: Week 24 (n=26,26)Delta-4-Androstenedione:Week 12(n=28,28)Delta-4-Androstenedione:Week 24(n=26,26)
Abiraterone Plus Leuprolide Plus Prednisone1.0490.6486.1435.9320.6191.75210.68420.92269.72451.6757156.2709047.4063.3155.192
Leuprolide Then Abiraterone Plus Leuprolide Plus Prednisone10.0143.1225.7976.7303.1000.500180.3077.617583.03651.759133338.8759207.34533.3302.831

[back to top]

Testosterone and Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Concentration in Prostate Tissue

Testosterone is a potent androgen (a hormone that promotes the development and maintenance of male characteristics) and major product secreted by cells in the testis and produced in the adrenal glands and by prostate cancers. Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) is a potent androgenic metabolite of testosterone. Testosterone and DHT concentration was measured in prostate tissues after exposure to study treatments at Week 24. (NCT00924469)
Timeframe: Week 24

,
InterventionPicogram per milligram (pg/mg) (Mean)
TestosteroneDHT
Abiraterone Plus Leuprolide Plus Prednisone0.2161.340
Leuprolide Then Abiraterone Plus Leuprolide Plus Prednisone0.0622.456

[back to top]

Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Concentration in Prostate Tissue

The DHT is a potent androgenic metabolite of testosterone and the concentration of DHT was measured in prostate tissues after exposure to study treatments at Week 12. (NCT00924469)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPicogram per milligram (pg/mg) (Mean)
Abiraterone Plus Leuprolide Plus Prednisone4.311
Leuprolide Then Abiraterone Plus Leuprolide Plus Prednisone2.170

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response (CR)

Complete response is defined as a disappearance of all target lesions and was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criterion. (NCT00924469)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Abiraterone Plus Leuprolide Plus Prednisone10.3
Leuprolide Then Abiraterone Plus Leuprolide Plus Prednisone3.7

[back to top]

Testosterone Concentration in Prostate Tissue

Testosterone is a potent androgen (a hormone that promotes the development and maintenance of male characteristics) and major product secreted by cells in the testis and produced in the adrenal glands and by prostate cancers. Abiraterone acetate affects sources of testosterone in the body (ie, adrendal gland and prostate tumor). Testosterone concentration was measured in prostate tissues after exposure to study treatments at Week 12. (NCT00924469)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPicogram per milligram (pg/mg) (Mean)
Abiraterone Plus Leuprolide Plus Prednisone0.089
Leuprolide Then Abiraterone Plus Leuprolide Plus Prednisone0.228

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the SFI: Ejaculation

"The SFI is a multidimensional, self-report instrument specifically designed to evaluate sexual function and satisfaction of men on treatment or with conditions that may affect sexual function. It consists of 11 questions which assess patient function in four domains: Sexual drive, Erection, Ejaculation, and Problem assessment, and a question in regards to overall assessment of sexual function.~Ejaculation domain consist of 2 questions and are scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=minimum, 4=maximum). Total score for the ejaculation domain ranges from 0 to 8. A higher scores represent better sexual function." (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: During 14 months

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Phase A, Month 3Phase A, Month 7Phase B, Month 9Phase B, Month 11Phase B, Month 13Phase B, Month 14
DC (Degarelix Continuous)-0.90-0.80-1.06-1.24-1.07-1.17
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)-1.04-1.23-1.24-0.94-0.89-0.79
LC (Leuprolide Continuous)-0.87-1.08-0.94-0.93-1.12-0.97
Total Continuous-0.88-1.02-0.97-1.00-1.11-1.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the Sexual Function Index (SFI): Sexual Drive

"The SFI is a multidimensional, self-report instrument specifically designed to evaluate sexual function and satisfaction of men on treatment or with conditions that may affect sexual function. It consists of 11 questions which assess patient function in four domains: Sexual drive, Erection, Ejaculation, and Problem assessment, and a question in regards to overall assessment of sexual function.~Sexual drive domain consist of 2 questions and are scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=minimum, 4=maximum). Total score for the sexual drive domain ranges from 0 to 8. A higher scores represent better sexual function." (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: During 14 months

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Phase A, Month 3Phase A, Month 7Phase B, Month 9Phase B, Month 11Phase B, Month 13Phase B, Month 14
DC (Degarelix Continuous)-1.57-1.39-1.51-1.52-1.55-1.65
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)-1.57-1.71-1.72-1.59-1.44-1.30
LC (Leuprolide Continuous)-1.27-1.67-1.62-1.65-1.72-1.72
Total Continuous-1.33-1.61-1.60-1.63-1.69-1.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) : Physical Well-being

"The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report quality of life (QoL) instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being, which is further supplemented by 12 site specific items to assess for prostate related symptoms. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 to 4, and then combined to produce sub-scale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score.~Physical well-being consist of 7 items and scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=Not at all; 1=A little bit; 2=Somewhat; 3=Quite a bit; 4=Very much). Total score for the physical well-being sub scale ranges from 0 to 28. Higher scores represent better QoL." (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: During 14 months

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Phase A, Month 3Phase A, Month 7Phase B, Month 8Phase B, Month 9Phase B, Month 10Phase B, Month 11Phase B, Month 12Phase B, Month 13Phase B, Month 14
DC (Degarelix Continuous)-1.63-1.48-1.92-1.85-2.08-1.77-1.62-2.10-1.90
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)-1.47-1.41-0.96-1.24-1.05-1.00-0.91-1.00-1.04
LC (Leuprolide Continuous)-1.41-1.67-1.74-1.77-1.68-1.53-1.32-1.40-1.45
Total Continuous-1.46-1.63-1.78-1.79-1.76-1.58-1.39-1.55-1.55

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the FACT-P: Total FACT-P Score

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report quality of life (QoL) instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being, which is further supplemented by 12 site specific items to assess for prostate related symptoms. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 to 4, and then combined to produce sub-scale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score. Total FACT-P scores ranges from 0 to 156. Higher scores represent better QoL. (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: During 14 months

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Phase A, Month 3Phase A, Month 7Phase B, Month 8Phase B, Month 9Phase B, Month 10Phase B, Month 11Phase B, Month 12Phase B, Month 13Phase B, Month 14
DC (Degarelix Continuous)-1.89-2.64-3.12-3.49-4.56-3.27-3.97-5.62-4.28
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)-1.86-2.03-1.75-1.61-0.89-1.18-0.95-1.74-1.36
LC (Leuprolide Continuous)-1.23-2.38-1.69-2.84-3.16-2.48-1.60-1.85-1.65
Total Continuous-1.37-2.43-1.99-2.98-3.45-2.65-2.09-2.64-2.20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the FACT-P : Social Well-being

"The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report quality of life (QoL) instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being, which is further supplemented by 12 site specific items to assess for prostate related symptoms. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 to 4, and then combined to produce sub-scale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score.~Social well-being consist of 7 items and scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=Not at all; 1=A little bit; 2=Somewhat; 3=Quite a bit; 4=Very much). Total score for the social well-being sub scale ranges from 0 to 28. Higher scores represent better QoL." (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: During 14 months

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Phase A, Month 3Phase A, Month 7Phase B, Month 8Phase B, Month 9Phase B, Month 10Phase B, Month 11Phase B, Month 12Phase B, Month 13Phase B, Month 14
DC (Degarelix Continuous)-0.06-0.30-0.52-0.95-1.00-1.09-1.34-1.35-0.68
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)-0.180.00-0.33-0.020.360.20-0.16-0.020.28
LC (Leuprolide Continuous)-0.36-0.46-0.41-1.10-1.15-0.83-0.85-0.72-0.55
Total Continuous-0.30-0.43-0.43-1.07-1.12-0.88-0.95-0.85-0.58

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the FACT-P : Functional Well-being

"The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report quality of life (QoL) instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being, which is further supplemented by 12 site specific items to assess for prostate related symptoms. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 to 4, and then combined to produce sub-scale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score.~Functional well-being consist of 7 items and scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=Not at all; 1=A little bit; 2=Somewhat; 3=Quite a bit; 4=Very much). Total score for the functional well-being sub scale ranges from 0 to 28. Higher scores represent better QoL." (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: During 14 months

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Phase A, Month 3Phase A, Month 7Phase B, Month 8Phase B, Month 9Phase B, Month 10Phase B, Month 11Phase B, Month 12Phase B, Month 13Phase B, Month 14
DC (Degarelix Continuous)-0.88-0.78-1.08-1.07-0.89-0.80-1.49-2.22-1.95
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)-0.96-1.41-1.18-1.14-1.35-1.25-0.92-1.49-1.02
LC (Leuprolide Continuous)-0.29-1.24-0.73-1.23-1.42-1.24-0.73-0.96-0.84
Total Continuous-0.42-1.15-0.80-1.20-1.31-1.15-0.89-1.22-1.07

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in Serum PSA Levels

Absolute change from Baseline in serum PSA levels during the study period was measured. (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: Phase A Visit 1-8 and Phase B Visit 9-15.

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Phase A, Visit 1 (Day 0)Phase A, Visit 2 (Month 1)Phase A, Visit 3 (Month 2)Phase A, Visit 4 (Month 3)Phase A, Visit 5 (Month 4)Phase A, Visit 6 (Month 5)Phase A, Visit 7 (Month 6)Phase A, Visit 8 (Month 7)Phase B, Visit 9 (Month 8)Phase B, Visit 10 (Month 9)Phase B, Visit 11 (Month 10)Phase B, Visit 12 (Month 11)Phase B, Visit 13 (Month 12)Phase B, Visit 14 (Month 13)Phase B, Visit 15 (Month 14)
DC (Degarelix Continuous)-0.91-14.3-14.8-15-15.1-15.1-15.1-15.1-15-15-14.9-14.9-14.8-14.8-14.8
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)NA-6.39-6.94-7.07-7.16-7.19-7.21-7.24-7.25-7.18-7.07-6.96-6.81-6.79-6.74
LC (Leuprolide Continuous)NA-6.38-8.12-8.44-8.51-8.59-8.64-8.64-8.64-8.64-8.63-8.64-8.64-8.59-8.6

[back to top]

Time to Return to Testosterone >0.5 ng/mL Level in the DI Treatment Group

The time to testosterone >0.5 ng/mL level in the DI group was counted from the start of Phase B at Day 196 (i.e. 28 days after last injection of degarelix) (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: During Phase B

InterventionDays (Median)
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)112.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the SFI: Problem Assessment

"The SFI is a multidimensional, self-report instrument specifically designed to evaluate sexual function and satisfaction of men on treatment or with conditions that may affect sexual function. It consists of 11 questions which assess patient function in four domains: Sexual drive, Erection, Ejaculation, and Problem assessment, and a question in regards to overall assessment of sexual function.~Problem assessment domain consist of 2 questions and are scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=minimum, 4=maximum). Total score for the problem assessment domain ranges from 0 to 8. A higher scores represent better sexual function." (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: During 14 months

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Phase A, Month 3Phase A, Month 7Phase B, Month 9Phase B, Month 11Phase B, Month 13Phase B, Month 14
DC (Degarelix Continuous)-0.58-0.88-0.71-0.53-1.63-1.68
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)-0.26-0.90-0.560.09-0.15-0.31
LC (Leuprolide Continuous)-0.36-0.57-0.64-0.98-1.07-0.89
Total Continuous-0.40-0.63-0.66-0.89-1.19-1.05

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone Levels

Absolute Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone Levels was measured. (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: Phase A Visit 1-8 and Phase B Visit 9-15.

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Phase A, Visit 1 (Day 0)Phase A, Visit 2 (Month 1)Phase A, Visit 3 (Month 2)Phase A, Visit 4 (Month 3)Phase A, Visit 5 (Month 4)Phase A, Visit 6 (Month 5)Phase A, Visit 7 (Month 6)Phase A, Visit 8 (Month 7)Phase B, Visit 9 (Month 8)Phase B, Visit 10 (Month 9)Phase B, Visit 11 (Month 10)Phase B, Visit 12 (Month 11)Phase B, Visit 13 (Month 12)Phase B, Visit 14 (Month 13)Phase B, Visit 15 (Month 14)
DC (Degarelix Continuous)-2.97-3.77-3.77-3.78-3.78-3.78-3.77-3.78-3.76-3.76-3.75-3.74-3.72-3.73-3.71
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)NA-3.64-3.67-3.68-3.67-3.67-3.66-3.66-3.63-3.41-3.0-2.57-2.18-2.1-1.77
LC (Leuprolide Continuous)NA-3.7-3.77-3.77-3.74-3.78-3.77-3.78-3.78-3.78-3.77-3.78-3.78-3.77-3.78

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the FACT-P : Additional Concerns

"The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report quality of life (QoL) instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being, which is further supplemented by 12 site specific items to assess for prostate related symptoms. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 to 4, and then combined to produce sub-scale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score.~Additional concerns consist of 12 items and scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=Not at all; 1=A little bit; 2=Somewhat; 3=Quite a bit; 4=Very much). Total score for the additional concerns ranges from 0 to 48. Higher scores represent better QoL." (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: During 14 months

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Phase A, Month 3Phase A, Month 7Phase B, Month 8Phase B, Month 9Phase B, Month 10Phase B, Month 11Phase B, Month 12Phase B, Month 13Phase B, Month 14
DC (Degarelix Continuous)-0.92-1.34-1.03-1.64-0.80-0.56-1.20-0.96-0.67
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)-1.14-0.89-1.29-0.97-0.86-0.80-0.75-0.91-0.81
LC (Leuprolide Continuous)-0.51-1.03-0.63-0.90-0.70-0.58-0.75-0.86-0.27
Total Continuous-0.60-1.10-0.72-1.06-0.72-0.57-0.84-0.88-0.35

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the FACT-P : Emotional Well-being

"The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report quality of life (QoL) instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being, which is further supplemented by 12 site specific items to assess for prostate related symptoms. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 to 4, and then combined to produce sub-scale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score.~Emotional well-being consist of 6 items and scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=Not at all; 1=A little bit; 2=Somewhat; 3=Quite a bit; 4=Very much). Total score for the emotional well-being sub scale ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores represent better QoL.Higher scores represent better QoL." (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: During 14 months

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Phase A, Month 3Phase A, Month 7Phase B, Month 8Phase B, Month 9Phase B, Month 10Phase B, Month 11Phase B, Month 12Phase B, Month 13Phase B, Month 14
DC (Degarelix Continuous)1.310.570.951.110.000.941.070.520.86
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)0.690.670.650.751.090.820.990.740.40
LC (Leuprolide Continuous)0.760.901.111.160.981.051.231.141.12
Total Continuous0.880.831.081.150.771.031.201.011.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the SFI: Total SFI Score

The SFI is a multidimensional, self-report instrument specifically designed to evaluate sexual function and satisfaction of men on treatment or with conditions that may affect sexual function. It consists of 11 questions which assess patient function in four domains: Sexual drive, Erection, Ejaculation, and Problem assessment, and a question in regards to overall assessment of sexual function. Total SFI score ranges from 0 to 44. A higher scores represent better sexual function. (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: During 14 months

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Phase A, Month 3Phase A, Month 7Phase B, Month 9Phase B, Month 11Phase B, Month 13Phase B, Month 14
DC (Degarelix Continuous)-3.93-4.28-4.35-4.62-5.59-5.93
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)-4.07-5.20-4.97-3.56-3.37-3.27
LC (Leuprolide Continuous)-3.69-4.57-4.62-4.74-5.15-4.68
Total Continuous-3.74-4.51-4.56-4.71-5.24-4.94

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the SFI: Overall Satisfaction With Sex Life

"The SFI is a multidimensional, self-report instrument specifically designed to evaluate sexual function and satisfaction of men on treatment or with conditions that may affect sexual function. It consists of 11 questions which assess patient function in four domains: Sexual drive, Erection, Ejaculation, and Problem assessment, and a question in regards to overall assessment of sexual function.~Overall satisfaction domain consist of single question and is scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=minimum, 4=maximum). A higher score represent better sexual function." (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: During 14 months

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Phase A, Month 3Phase A, Month 7Phase B, Month 9Phase B, Month 11Phase B, Month 13Phase B, Month 14
DC (Degarelix Continuous)-0.18-0.37-0.34-0.47-0.57-0.70
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)-0.32-0.28-0.33-0.15-0.11-0.12
LC (Leuprolide Continuous)-0.27-0.40-0.41-0.41-0.42-0.37
Total Continuous-0.25-0.39-0.39-0.42-0.45-0.44

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sexual Function as Assessed by the SFI: Erection

"The SFI is a multidimensional, self-report instrument specifically designed to evaluate sexual function and satisfaction of men on treatment or with conditions that may affect sexual function. It consists of 11 questions which assess patient function in four domains: Sexual drive, Erection, Ejaculation, and Problem assessment, and a question in regards to overall assessment of sexual function.~Erection domain consist of 3 questions and are scored on a scale of 0-4 (0=minimum, 4=maximum). Total score for the erection domain ranges from 0 to 12. A higher scores represent better sexual function." (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: During 14 months

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Phase A, Month 3Phase A, Month 7Phase B, Month 9Phase B, Month 11Phase B, Month 13Phase B, Month 14
DC (Degarelix Continuous)-0.91-1.06-1.07-1.34-1.36-1.43
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)-1.32-1.43-1.52-1.15-0.97-0.90
LC (Leuprolide Continuous)-1.21-1.34-1.46-1.28-1.33-1.26
Total Continuous-1.14-1.28-1.38-1.30-1.34-1.29

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone Levels

Percent change from Baseline in serum testosterone levels was measured. (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: Phase A Visit 1-8 and Phase B Visit 9-15.

,,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Phase A, Visit 1 (Day 0)Phase A, Visit 2 (Month 1)Phase A, Visit 3 (Month 2)Phase A, Visit 4 (Month 3)Phase A, Visit 5 (Month 4)Phase A, Visit 6 (Month 5)Phase A, Visit 7 (Month 6)Phase A, Visit 8 (Month 7)Phase B, Visit 9 (Month 8)Phase B, Visit 10 (Month 9)Phase B, Visit 11 (Month 10)Phase B, Visit 12 (Month 11)Phase B, Visit 13 (Month 12)Phase B, Visit 14 (Month 13)Phase B, Visit 15 (Month 14)
DC (Degarelix Continuous)-95.8-97.4-97.5-97.8-97.7-97.6-97.6-97.5-97.1-97-97-96.7-96-96.5-95.8
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)NA-96.4-97.3-97.5-97.2-97.3-96.8-96.9-95.6-88.7-77-65.4-54.7-51.9-44
LC (Leuprolide Continuous)NA-95.5-97.7-97.5-96.2-97.8-97.9-97.7-97.8-97.7-97.5-97.9-97.8-97.4-97.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Serum PSA Levels ≤4.0 ng/mL

Percentage of patients with serum PSA levels ≤4.0 ng/mL at 14 month was presented. (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: At 14 month

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)100
Total Continuous98.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With a Serum PSA Level ≤4.0 ng/mL

Percentage of Subjects With a Serum PSA Level ≤4.0 ng/mL was measured during the study period. (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: At 14 months

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)100
DC (Degarelix Continuous)97.6
LC (Leuprolide Continuous)98.7

[back to top]

Time to Return to Normal Range (≥1.5 ng/mL) or Baseline Testosterone Level

The time to return to normal range (≥1.5 ng/mL) or Baseline testosterone level in the DI group was counted from the start of Phase B at Day 196 (i.e. 28 days after last injection of degarelix). (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: During Phase B

InterventionDays (Median)
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)168

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum PSA Levels

Percent change from Baseline in serum PSA levels during the study period was measured. (NCT00928434)
Timeframe: Phase A Visit 1-8 and Phase B Visit 9-15.

,,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Phase A, Visit 1 (Day 0)Phase A, Visit 2 (Month 1)Phase A, Visit 3 (Month 2)Phase A, Visit 4 (Month 3)Phase A, Visit 5 (Month 4)Phase A, Visit 6 (Month 5)Phase A, Visit 7 (Month 6)Phase A, Visit 8 (Month 7)Phase B, Visit 9 (Month 8)Phase B, Visit 10 (Month 9)Phase B, Visit 11 (Month 10)Phase B, Visit 12 (Month 11)Phase B, Visit 13 (Month 12)Phase B, Visit 14 (Month 13)Phase B, Visit 15 (Month 14)
DC (Degarelix Continuous)-39.6-84.5-92.4-94.5-95.5-95.7-95.8-95.4-95.5-95.6-95.7-95.1-95.1-95.1-94.4
DI (Degarelix Intermittent)NA-80.8-90.4-92.8-94.1-94.2-94.8-95.4-95.7-93.6-91.9-88-84.2-82.8-80.8
LC (Leuprolide Continuous)NA-62.8-87.3-92.3-93.4-94.5-95.3-95.5-95.2-94.3-93.1-94.4-94.5-93.1-93.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Domain Score

The EPIC assesses disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and it's therapies and consists of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal), each ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as time point value - baseline value, such that a positive change indicates improvement. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
End of RTSix months post-RTOne year post-RTFive years post-RT
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone-1.8-0.7-0.8-0.3
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation-18.4-13.7-7.8-2.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Late Grade 3+ Adverse Events

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Late adverse events are defined as occurring more than 30 days after the end of radiation therapy. Failure is defined as grade 3 or higher late adverse event. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone12.8
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation15.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Dead Due to Cause Other Than Prostate Cancer (Non-Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality)

Non-prostate cancer specific mortality is defined as a death without evidence of prostate cancer or a complication from treatment. . Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone9.1
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation9.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival)

Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone90.0
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation91.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Acute Adverse Events

Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Acute adverse events are defined as occuring within 30 days of completion of radiation therapy. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone152
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation504

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Failed (Freedom From Failure)

Failure is defined as biochemical failure, local failure, or distant metastasis. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone14.8
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation7.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Receiving Salvage Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)

Salvage (non-protocol) ADT administration is defined as the first administration of subsequent ADT (either LHRH agonist or anti-androgen) Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Salvage ADT rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of salvage ADT times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone6.1
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation4.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Dead Due to Prostate Cancer (Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality)

Prostate cancer specific mortality (failure) is defined as death due to prostate cancer or a complication from treatment. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone0.90
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis

"Distant metastasis (failure) is defined as metastatic disease documented by any method. If diagnosed on diagnostic imaging prompted by biochemical failure, then the event date will be the date of biochemical progression.~Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (competing risk), or death without failure (censored). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported." (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone3.1
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation0.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Local Recurrence

Local recurrence (failure) is defined as clinical (palpable) suspicion of local recurrence [this date is used] confirmed by biopsy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone2.6
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Bowel Domain Score

The EPIC assesses disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and it's therapies and consists of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal), each ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as time point value - baseline value, such that a positive change indicates improvement. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
End of RTSix months post-RTOne year post-RTFive years post-RT
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone-9.7-2.6-4.0-2.7
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation-10.5-3.8-5.2-2.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Domain Score

The EPIC assesses disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and it's therapies and consists of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal), each ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as time point value - baseline value, such that a positive change indicates improvement. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
End of RTSix months post-RTOne year post-RTFive years post-RT
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone-6.7-7.9-8.5-10.0
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation-22.6-19.9-16.6-9.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Urinary Domain Score

The EPIC assesses disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and it's therapies and consists of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal), each ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as time point value - baseline value, such that a positive change indicates improvement. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
End of RTSix months post-RTOne year post-RTFive years post-RT
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone (Arm 1)-12.4-0.1-1.9-0.4
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation (Arm 2)-13.8-3.6-1.60.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Domain Score

The PROMIS Fatigue short form 8a contains 8 questions, each with 5 responses ranging from 1 to 5, evaluating self-reported fatigue symptoms over the past 7 days. The total score is the sum of all questions which is then converted into a pro-rated T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with a possible range of 33.1 to 77.8. Higher scores indicate more fatigue. Change is defined as value at one year - value at baseline. Positive change from baseline indicates increased fatigue at one year. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
End of RTSix months post-RTOne year post_RTFive years post-RT
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone0.801.090.990.97
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation1.841.210.860.80

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival) by Radiation Therapy Modality

Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
EBRTEBRT +LDR Brachytherapy BoostEBRT +HDR Brachytherapy Boost
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone89.410091.7
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation90.397.2100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure

Biochemical failure is defined as an increase of at least 2 ng/ml above the nadir PSA. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone13.9
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation7.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Regardless of Attribution

Percentage of Participants with Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events regardless of attribution per NCI CTCAE Version 3 (NCT00937768)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Androgen Deprivation Therapy100
No Androgen Deprivation Therapy37.5

[back to top]

Number of Deaths

The number of deaths due to any cause are reported below. (NCT00937768)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Androgen Deprivation Therapy0
No Androgen Deprivation Therapy0

[back to top]

Average Overall FACT-P Total Score at Baseline, Months 3 and 6

The overall FACT-P Total Score at Baseline and months 3 and 6 mean and standard deviations are reported below. The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess participant function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global quality of life score which is the sum of all 5 domain scores and ranges from 0 to 156 where higher scores represent better quality of life. (NCT00937768)
Timeframe: Baseline and months 3 and 6

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineMonth 3Month 6
Androgen Deprivation Therapy122.7118.6109.4
No Androgen Deprivation Therapy114.8117.8136.8

[back to top]

Average LASA Overall Quality of Life at Baseline, Months 3 and 6

LASA Overall Quality of Life at Baseline, Months 3 and 6. Quality of Life (QOL) was measured using the single-item Linear Analogue Self Assessment (LASA) on a 0-10 scale, with 0=as bad as it can be and 10=as good as it can be. The average and standard deviation of the LASA overall quality of life score are reported below at baseline, months 3 and 6. (NCT00937768)
Timeframe: Baseline to Months 3 and 6

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineMonth 3Month 6
Androgen Deprivation Therapy8.81.06.2
No Androgen Deprivation Therapy6.97.08.7

[back to top]

Incidence of Acute and Chronic Grade 3 or Greater Toxicity as Evaluated Using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 3.0

Incidence of acute and chronic grade 3 or greater toxicity as evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 3.0he distribution of time to late adverse events (observed severities of adverse events over time) will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01023061)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months after initiation of radiation therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Radiation Therapy)6

[back to top]

Median Time to Prostate Specific Antigen Progression

Defined as the date of an increase of 2ng/mL or more above the Prostate specific antigen nadir achieved after completion of radiation with the date of progression defined as the date on which that value was measured. Distribution of time-to-event variables will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Estimated with two-sided 95% confidence intervals. (NCT01023061)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionyears (Mean)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Radiation Therapy)5

[back to top]

Levels of Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and Testosterone in Prostate Biopsy Sample Assessed by Mass Spectrometry

The levels from patients treated in this study will be compared to a control set of biopsies acquired from a separate but similar population of men with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer treated with three months of combined Luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist and bicalutamide as part of standard of care. (NCT01023061)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpg/mg (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Radiation Therapy)0.050

[back to top]

Number of Participants Progression Free at 1 Year

Participants prostatic specific antigen (PSA) progression-free or event-free survival (that is, freedom from treatment failure) 1 year postoperatively. Treatment failure defined as objective tumor progression during therapy or in year after surgery, confirmed postoperative PSA ⩾1 ngml - 1, or any postoperative radiation, hormonal or other systemic therapy. Participants who did not undergo surgery within 8 weeks of completing 1 year of therapy on protocol (for any reason, including participant refusal) were counted as treatment failure, as were participants whose surgery was begun and aborted. (NCT01076335)
Timeframe: 1 Year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Neoadjuvant Hormones + Docetaxel13

[back to top]

The Change in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) From Baseline to 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months.

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and to monitor disease progression. The IPSS is calculated from 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, and straining [rated as 0 (not at all) to 5 (almost always)], as well as how many times on average a participant has to get up to urinate at night (0=none to 5=5 times or more). The total score is classified as follows: 0 to 7 = mildly symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; and 20 to 35 = severely symptomatic. (NCT01078545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
IPSS at Baseline (n=727)IPSS at month 3 (n=724)IPSS at month 6 (n=717)IPSS at month 9 (n=702)IPSS at month 12 (n=699)
Advanced PCa Patients With LUTS Treated With GnRH Analogue17.814.012.310.910.0

[back to top]

The Change in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) From Baseline to Month 12. The IPSS Has a Range From 0 to 35.

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and to monitor disease progression. The IPSS is calculated from 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, and straining [rated as 0 (not at all) to 5 (almost always)], as well as how many times on average a participant has to get up to urinate at night (0=none to 5=5 times or more). The total score is classified as follows: 0 to 7 = mildly symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; and 20 to 35 = severely symptomatic. (NCT01078545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
IPSS at Baseline (n=727)IPSS at 12 months (n=699)
Advanced PCa Patients With LUTS Treated With GnRH Analogue17.810.0

[back to top]

Changes in the Intensity of Symptoms Connected With Prostate Cancer From Baseline to Month 3, 6, 9, and 12.

Changes in the intensity of the following symptoms connected with prostate cancer: hematospermia (blood in the sperm), lower abdominal pain, urine incontinence, erectile dysfunction, crotch pain, anal pain or bleeding, lumbar/back pain, bone pain, spinal compression symptoms, peripheral lymph node enlargement, and lymphatic oedema of lower extremities. The intensity of each symptom was rated by the participant from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). Zero indicates that the symptom was not present. (NCT01078545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

InterventionUnits on a scale (Median)
Hematospermia (Baseline; n=729)Lower abdominal pain (Baseline; n=729)>Month 3 (n=726)Urinary incontinence (Baseline; n=729)Erectile dysfunction (Baseline; n=729)Crotch pain (Baseline; n=729)Anal pain or bleeding (Baseline; n=729)Lumbar/back pain (Baseline n=729)Bone pain (Baseline; n=729)>Month 9 (n=704)>Month 12 (n=703)Spinal compression symptoms (Baseline; n=729)Periph. lymph node enlargement (Baseline; n=729)Lymphatic oedema, lower extrem. (Baseline; n=729)>Month 6 (n=719)
Advanced PCa Patients With LUTS Treated With GnRH Analogue0000000000000004556600000000000000000000000000000000000

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients at Baseline With One of the Symptoms Connected With Prostate Cancer.

Percentage of participants at baseline with one of the following symptoms connected with prostate cancer: hematospermia (blood in the sperm), lower abdominal pain, urine incontinence, erectile dysfunction, crotch pain, anal pain or bleeding, lumbar/back pain, bone pain, spinal compression symptoms, peripheral lymph node enlargement, and lymphatic oedema of lower extremities. The intensity of each symptom was rated by the participant from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). Zero indicates that the symptom was not present. (NCT01078545)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
HematospermiaLower abdominal painUrine incontinenceErectile dysfunctionCrotch painAnal pain or bleedingLumbar/back painBone painSpinal compression symptomsPeripheral lymph node enlargementLymphatic oedema of the lower extremities
Advanced PCa Patients With LUTS Treated With GnRH Analogue33113622421517126

[back to top]

Reported Adverse Events/Serious Adverse Events

Adverse events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from the first visit (Baseline) through the last visit (12 months). The number of participants experiencing a non-serious or serious adverse event or both types of events are summarized. See the Reported Adverse Event section for details. (NCT01078545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Experienced a serious AEExperienced a non-serious AEExperienced both a serious AE and non-serious AE
Advanced PCa Patients With LUTS Treated With GnRH Analogue531

[back to top]

Epidemiological Data: Node Staging - the Number of Participants With a Positive or Negative Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Test

In this case, a CT or MRI is considered positive when lymph nodes are detectable. A CT or MRI is considered negative when lymph nodes are not detectable. (NCT01081873)
Timeframe: at time 0 (Baseline)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Positive at baselineNegative at baseline
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants3741212

[back to top]

Epidemiological Data: Race

The number of participants by race at baseline is presented. (NCT01081873)
Timeframe: at time 0 (Baseline)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
BlackCaucasianOther
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants5921544

[back to top]

Effectiveness Parameter for Screening or Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Mean Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) at Each Visit

The mean PSA in ng/mL to screen and assess for the recurrence of prostate cancer at each visit is presented. (NCT01081873)
Timeframe: time 0 (Baseline), month 3, and every 3 months until disease progression or up to 24 months, whichever came first

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Baseline62.16
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 312.95
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 66.23
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 98.01
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 128.41
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 158.88
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 189.57
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 2123.02
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 2415.29
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants - Last Available Record30.32

[back to top]

Epidemiological Data: the Number of Participants With Tumor Stages T0, T1, T2, T3, and T4.

The number of participants with tumor stages T0, T1, T2, T3, and T4 as reported by the physician or pathologist is summarized. T0: no evidence of primary tumor. T1: histologic tumor confined to prostate; clinically unapparent tumor, undetectable by digital rectal examination or by ultrasound. T2: tumor is confined to prostrate and can be detected by digital rectal examination. T3: tumor extends through the prostate capsule but has not spread to other organs. T4: tumor has invaded adjacent structures/organs other than seminal vesicles. (NCT01081873)
Timeframe: at time 0 (Baseline)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
T0 stageT1 stageT2 stageT3 stageT4 stage
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants302236141215220

[back to top]

Epidemiological Data: Tumor Staging - Among Participants With a Positive Biopsy, the Number of Participants With Adenocarcinoma Tissue or Other Tissues Recorded for the Positive Biopsy.

Among those participants with a positive biopsy at baseline, the number of participants with adenocarcinoma tissue or other tissue type is summarized. (NCT01081873)
Timeframe: at time 0 (Baseline)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AdenocarcinomaOtherNot done
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Baseline226991

[back to top]

Treatment Patterns for Prostate Cancer Treatments: Number of Participants at Each Visit Who Took Lucrin/Lucrin Tridepot, Luteinizing Hormone-releasing Hormone (LHRH) Agonists, Anti-androgens, or Other Drug Treatments, or Who Had Surgery or Radiotherapy.

Prostate cancer treatment for all participants is summarized by the number of participants at each visit who took any Lucrin/Lucrin Tridepot, LHRH agonist, anti-androgens, or other drug treatments, or who had any type of surgery or radiotherapy (external radiation or brachytherapy). (NCT01081873)
Timeframe: time 0 (Baseline), month 3, and every 3 months until disease progression or up to 24 months, whichever came first

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any Lucrin or Lucrin Tridepot used at each visitAny LHRH agonist treatments used at each visitAny anti-androgen treatments used at each visitOther drug treatments used at each visitAny surgery performed any time up to the visitExternal radiation performed any time up to visitBrachytherapy performed any time up to the visit
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants - Use at Any Visit2384239210218628122826
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Baseline202820348413124412913
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 12969973397311277910
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 155405452232792439
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 186296362612494569
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 214504521822380338
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 24162816356035719213321
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 310111015388221458410
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 6817821303211037610
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 964064324324977311

[back to top]

Effectiveness Parameter for Prognosis: the Number of Participants With a Survival Prognosis of > 10 Years, 5 - 10 Years, 1 - 5 Years, 6 - 12 Months, and < 6 Months

The prognosis for participants is summarized for each visit by the number of participants at each visit with a survival prognosis of 10 years, 5 - 10 years, 1 - 5 years, 6 - 12 months, and < 6 months. Methods for determining survival prognosis were not prespecified, but were based on the judgement of each Investigator. (NCT01081873)
Timeframe: time 0 (Baseline), month 3, and every 3 months thereafter until disease progression or up to 24 months, whichever came first

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
> 10 years5 - 10 years1 - 5 years6 - 12 months< 6 months
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants - Last Available Record33111737359333
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Baseline3951041663263
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 12113479268183
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 1575276140153
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 1882309182137
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 2166225117126
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 242068054204816
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 3132476312156
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 6100402237103
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 991320180112

[back to top]

Epidemiological Data: Tumor Staging (Positive or Negative) Via a Rectal Examination, Prostate Biopsy, Echograph, or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Test.

The number of participants at baseline who were positive or negative for tumors via a rectal examination, prostate biopsy, echograph of the hyperechogenic zones, or MRI are provided. (NCT01081873)
Timeframe: at time 0 (Baseline)

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Positive at baselineNegative at baseline
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants - Echograph1806446
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants - MRI10285
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants - Prostate Biopsy23559
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants - Rectal Examination2045439

[back to top]

Effectiveness Parameter for Staging of Prostate Cancer: Metastases at Each Visit

The number of participants with metastases that are absent, local tumor, single metastases, multiple metastases in 1 organ, and multiple metastases in multiple organs at each visit is summarized. (NCT01081873)
Timeframe: time 0 (Baseline), month 3, and every 3 months until disease progression or up to 24 months, whichever came first

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AbsentLocal tumorSingle metastasesMultiple metastases in 1 organMultiple metastases in multiple organs
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants - Last Available Record87064100268109
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Baseline7826410823375
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 1274231812
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 153312135
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 184403107
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 212932135
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 2418810156334
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 3591082715
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 64533184
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 928321310

[back to top]

Effectiveness Parameter: the Number of Participants With a Complete or Partial Response, Stable Disease, or Progressive Disease Following Treatment at Each Visit

Response to treatment is summarized by the number of participants at each visit with a complete or partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease. Disease status determination was not predefined, but was based on the judgement of each Investigator. (NCT01081873)
Timeframe: month 3, and every 3 months until disease progression or up to 24 months, whichever came first

,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete responsePartial responseStable diseaseProgressive disease
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants - Last Available Record1420284224282
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 126681819785
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 15347976952
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 184019810278
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 21276597367
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 241181199200184
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 35253799737
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 64962318937
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants at Month 94021398346

[back to top]

Epidemiological Data: Bone Scan at Baseline

The number of participants at baseline with a positive or negative bone scan was summarized. Determination of bone scan status was based on the interpretation of the Investigator or radiologist. (NCT01081873)
Timeframe: at time 0 (Baseline)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Positive at baselineNegative at baseline
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants4971353

[back to top]

Epidemiological Data: Mean Weight

The mean weight of all participants at baseline is provided. (NCT01081873)
Timeframe: at time 0 (Baseline)

Interventionkg (Mean)
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants77.36

[back to top]

Safety Parameter: Number of Participants Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

The number of participants experiencing a serious adverse event during the course of the study is summarized. See the Reported Adverse Event section for details. (NCT01081873)
Timeframe: Baseline to disease progression or 24 months, whichever came first

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants121

[back to top]

Epidemiological Data: PSA at Baseline

The median, minimum, and maximum PSA values in ng/mL at baseline are provided. The mean PSA at baseline is reported in the Primary Outcome Measure section above. (NCT01081873)
Timeframe: at time 0 (Baseline)

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants13.66

[back to top]

Epidemiological Data: Mean Age

The mean age of all participants at baseline is provided. (NCT01081873)
Timeframe: at time 0 (Baseline)

Interventionyears (Mean)
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants75.39

[back to top]

Epidemiological Data: Metastasis Staging (M0 or M1) at Baseline

The number of participants at baseline reported to be in metastasis stage M0 or M1 is summarized. M0: no distant metastasis. M1: metastasis to distant organs beyond regional lymph nodes. (NCT01081873)
Timeframe: at time 0 (Baseline)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
M0 stageM1 stage
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants1373501

[back to top]

Epidemiological Data: Node Staging - the Number of Participants With a N0 or N1 Stage at Baseline.

N0: tumor cells absent from regional lymph nodes. N1: regional lymph node metastasis present. (NCT01081873)
Timeframe: at time 0 (Baseline)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
N0 stageN1 stage
Advanced Prostate Cancer Participants1296360

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Pathology Tumor Stage of Less Than or Equal to Prostate Cancer Stage at Which the Tumor is Confined to the Prostate (pT2)

The table below shows number of participants in each treatment group with a pathology tumor stage less than or equal to pT2. (NCT01088529)
Timeframe: At the end of Cycle 3 (at radical prostatectomy)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AA+LHRHa24
LHRHa8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Positive Surgical Margin at Radical Prostatectomy

The table below shows number of participants in each treatment group who had positive surgical margins. A positive surgical margin is defined as tumor extending to the inked-surface or margin of the prostate. (NCT01088529)
Timeframe: At the end of Cycle 3 (at radical prostatectomy)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AA+LHRHa6
LHRHa6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Prostate-Specific Antigen Response

The table below shows number of participants in each treatment group who achieved a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response defined as a drop in PSA value to less than or equal to 0.2 ng/mL. (NCT01088529)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 Day 1

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AA+LHRHa32
LHRHa0

[back to top]

Percent Change in Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)

Wake after sleep onset (WASO) is calculated by averaging the number of minutes spent awake after initiating sleep each night from the two ambulatory polysomnography studies conducted at baseline and the two ambulatory polysomnography studies conducted four weeks after the GnRHa injection. (NCT01116401)
Timeframe: baseline and 4 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Number)
GnRH Agonist Injection62

[back to top]

Change in Montgomery-Asperg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale is a widely used 10-item clinician-rated scale that describes the severity of depressive symptoms. It has a range of 0-60 with higher scores indicating greater symptom burden. Participants were assessed at baseline and four weeks after the GnRHa injection in order to calculate the change in MADRS score. (NCT01116401)
Timeframe: baseline and 4 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
GnRH Agonist Injection3.1

[back to top]

Correlation of microRNA Measures With 28-week PSA Response

The Friedman test will be used to evaluate correlations between microRNA measures (CT) and 28-week PSA response. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Baseline to 28 weeks

,,
InterventionCycle Threshold (CT) (Median)
miR-141miR-200amiR-200bmiR-210miR-375
PSA Complete Response32.634.533.632.533.0
PSA Non-Responders31.533.832.632.329.5
PSA Partial Response32.033.833.632.132.6

[back to top]

Undetectable PSA Rate

Undetectable PSA rate (<= 0.2 ng/mL) after seven cycles (28 weeks) of protocol treatment (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: 7 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)42
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)34

[back to top]

Toxicity

Only adverse events that are possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug are reported. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Up to 28 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Alanine aminotransferase increasedAnemiaAnxietyAspartate aminotransferase increasedCognitive disturbanceDepressionErectile dysfunctionExostosisGlucose intoleranceHot flashesHypercalcemiaHyperglycemiaHypertensionHypertriglyceridemiaLeft ventricular systolic dysfunctionNauseaObesitySoft tissue infectionUrinary tract infectionUrinary tract obstructionVomiting
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)110110110128211111101
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)011001001100200010010

[back to top]

Correlation of microRNA Measures With Baseline Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Counts

The Friedman test will be used to evaluate correlations between microRNA measures (CT) and Baseline CTCs. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Baseline

,,
InterventionCycle Threshold (CT) (Median)
miR-141miR-200amiR-200bmiR-210miR-375
CTC= 1-432.734.733.232.732.7
CTC= 5+31.933.033.632.130.2
CTC=033.034.433.432.532.8

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Who do Not Achieve a Partial PSA Response

A partial PSA response is considered <= 4 ng/mL (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)46
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)56

[back to top]

Change in Level of IGFBP2, IGFBP3 and Growth Hormone

Serum samples and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) for pharmacodynamic activity with potential biomarkers for IMC-A12 (including, but not limited to: IGFBP2, IGFBP3 and Growth Hormone) obtained from optional blood specimens both before initiation of androgen deprivation therapy and twelve weeks after initiation of combined therapy. Results are reported as the difference between baseline and 12 weeks after start of therapy. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
IGFBP-IIGFBP-IIIGH
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)-9461389366
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)-904291-25

[back to top]

Change in Level of IGF-I, Free IGF-I and C-peptide

Serum samples and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) for pharmacodynamic activity with potential biomarkers for IMC-A12 (including, but not limited to: IGF-I, free IGF-I and C-peptide) obtained from optional blood specimens both before initiation of androgen deprivation therapy and twelve weeks after initiation of combined therapy. Results are reported as the difference between baseline and 12 weeks after start of therapy. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
C-peptideIGF-IIGF-II
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)-7010
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)31-6

[back to top]

Change in Level of Insulin

Serum samples and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) for pharmacodynamic activity with potential biomarkers for IMC-A12 (insulin) obtained from optional blood specimens both before initiation of androgen deprivation therapy and twelve weeks after initiation of combined therapy. Results are reported as the difference between baseline and 12 weeks after start of therapy. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionulU/mL (Mean)
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)0
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)0

[back to top]

Serum Testosterone Recovery

To Evaluate the time to testosterone recovery, which is defined as a return to with in 90% of pretreatment level, after 6 months of neo-adjuvant treatment with Eligard 22.5mg with Radiation Therapy in patients with early prostate Cancer (NCT01136226)
Timeframe: 6 mos

InterventionMonths (Mean)
Single Arm- Eligard6

[back to top]

Discomfort From Injection

Questionnaire responses recorded on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), which has a range of 0-100 mm, assessed approximately 15 minutes post-injection (NCT01161563)
Timeframe: 15 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Leuprolide Acetate20.53
Triptorelin Pamoate5.88

[back to top]

Patient Bother From Injection Site Burning and/or Stinging

Questionnaire responses recorded on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), which has a range of 0-100 mm, assessed approximately 15 minutes post-injection (NCT01161563)
Timeframe: 15 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Leuprolide Acetate23.87
Triptorelin Pamoate5.84

[back to top]

Immunologic Response: Number of Participants With Immune Response

Immunological response assays were measured at several time points starting at baseline until the eighth week after starting the medicine for each participant. The immunological responses measured were Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4), Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) and Inducible T-cell Costimulatory (ICOS) markers. T-cells with the CD4 marker help coordinate the immune system response to an invader. Killer T-cells have the CD8 marker and are responsible for killing the invader. ICOS is a molecule which stimulates the activity of the immune response of the killer T-Cells and memory T cells. Participants with at least a 2 fold increase in the presence of CD4, CD8, or ICOS markers from the participant's baseline measure were considered a responder for that marker. (NCT01194271)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CD4CD8ICOS
Neoadjuvant Ipilimumab1279

[back to top]

Count of Patients With AMH of ≤1.0 ng/mL vs >1 ng/mL,

AMH level ≤1.0 predicts onset of menopause within 5 years in normal women (NCT01257802)
Timeframe: baseline and 6 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline AMH level ≤1.0 ng/mlBaseline AMH level >1 ng/ml6 Month AMH level ≤1.0 ng/ml6 Month AMH level >1 ng/ml
LUPRON3341
PLACEBO6110

[back to top]

Mean Antral Follicle Count (AFC)

Mean antral follicle count (AFC) is the average number of follicles counted in each of 2 ovaries (NCT01257802)
Timeframe: baseline and 6 months

,
Intervention# of ovarian follicles (Mean)
Baseline Mean antral follicle count (AFC)6 Month Mean antral follicle count (AFC)
LUPRON10.32.5
PLACEBO14.417.7

[back to top]

Mean Ovarian Volume.

Mean ovarian volume reflects the preservation of ovarian tissue despite exposure to cyclophosphamide; reduced ovarian size is documented in cyclophosphamide treated patients (NCT01257802)
Timeframe: baseline and 6 months

,
Interventioncubic centimeters (Mean)
Baseline mean ovarian volume6 Month mean ovarian volume
LUPRON9.594.26
PLACEBO7.686.97

[back to top]

Anti-mullerian Hormone (AMH) Measured as a Continuous Variable, Specifically Assessing the Intra-person Change From Study Entry (Day 0) to 6-month Post-intervention Visit

AMH was quantified in vitro a commercially available enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Beckman Coulter; Marseille, France) was used for in vitro quantitative measurement of serum AMH. (NCT01257802)
Timeframe: Day 0 to 6-month post-intervention visit

,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Baseline AMH (ng/ml)6 month AMH (ng/ml)
LUPRON2.070.72
Placebo3.870.24

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Either an AMH Level of >1 ng/mL OR Antral Follicle Count of >4.

An AMH level of >1 ng/ml and/or an antral follicle count of >4 in either ovary is a strong predictor of residual ovarian function (NCT01257802)
Timeframe: baseline and 6 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline AMH >1 ng/ml or AFC>46 Month AMH >1 ng/ml or AFC>4
LUPRON41
PLACEBO60

[back to top]

Clinical Pregnancy Rate

Clinical pregnancy was confirmed by observing fetal cardiac activity on transvaginal ultrasound four weeks after a positive pregnancy test. (NCT01269125)
Timeframe: June 2004-August 2010

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Endometriosis, GnRH-a Treatment, IVF28.3
Endometriosis, IVF25.4
Tubal Infertility, IVF33.3

[back to top]

Fertilization Rate (Percentage of Fertilized Oocytes).

The fertilization rate was estimated for every woman 24 hours after oocyte retrieval (NCT01269125)
Timeframe: June 2004-August 2010

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Endometriosis, GnRH-a Treatment, IVF73.7
Endometriosis, IVF62.7
Tubal Infertility, IVF75.7

[back to top]

Follicular Fluid's TNF-a Concentration.

TNF-a was measured in the FF of all women (secondary outcome measures). To prevent any cytokine alterations, only blood-free samples were used. (NCT01269125)
Timeframe: June 2004-August 2010

,,
Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
TNF-aIL-1βIL-6IL-8IL-1-ra
Endometriosis, GnRH-a Treatment, IVF21.43.116.7238.1166.6
Endometriosis, IVF38.69.332.1347.8183
Tubal Infertility, IVF22.52.914.7241151.7

[back to top]

Embryo Quality (the Percentage of Grade 1 Embryos Per Participant).

Embryo development was evaluated 2 days after oocyte pick-up. The number of blastomeres and the proportion of embryo volume occupied by fragments were used for the evaluation. Embryos with < 10%, < 10-20%, < 20-30% and >30% fragments were estimated as grade 1,2,3 and 4, respectively. (NCT01269125)
Timeframe: June 2004-August 2010

InterventionPercentage of grade 1 embryos (Mean)
Endometriosis, GnRH-a Treatment, IVF25.5
Endometriosis, IVF22.6
Tubal Infertility, IVF27.0

[back to top]

Clinical Pregnancy Rate

Clinical pregnancy rate was confirmed by observing fetal cardiac activity on transvaginal ultrasound four weeks after a positive pregnancy test. (NCT01269125)
Timeframe: 4 weeks after a positive pregnancy test

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
Endometriosis, GnRH-a Treatment, IVF28.3
Endometriosis, IVF25.4
Tubal Infertility, IVF33.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Are Castrate by Day 60

(NCT01326312)
Timeframe: 60 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
GTx- 758 1000mg19
GTx-758 2000mg34
Lupron Depot43

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Are Castrate by Day 60 and Maintained Castrate Range From Day 60 to Day 360/End of Study.

(NCT01326312)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
GTx- 758 1000mg0
GTx-758 2000mg3
Lupron Depot9

[back to top]

Time to Castration in Participants With Prostate Cancer

Median time to castration was summarized using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01326312)
Timeframe: 60 days

Interventiondays (Median)
GTx-758 1000mg29
GTx-758 2000mg21
Lupron Depot21

[back to top]

Time to Engraftment in First Transplant Recipients Only With Median Thoracic Spine Standardized Uptake Values (SUV) of 1.4 or Greater Than Those Patients With SUV's Less Than 1.4

18F-FLT imaging was performed serially on patients post transplant to identify the level of uptake of 18F-FLT at a day +5 to +12 scan and the day at which neutrophils recover to >500 (i.e., subclinical bone-marrow recovery within 5 days of Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT infusion)). On each image for each patient, the region of interest was drawn within each thoracic medullary space (n=12), generating the SUV for each space. The mean of these was calculated for each scan. The analysis was the median of the means of the SUV of the thorax values of the day 5-12 scan (averaged the SUV of the thorax for each patient and then took the medians of these). (NCT01338987)
Timeframe: 18F FLT scan done between days +5 to +12 and then time from that scan to engraftment measured

InterventionDays (Median)
Patients with SUV 1.4 or greaterPatients with SUV less than 1.4
Transplant Recipient515

[back to top]

Percentage of B Cells at One Year Post-transplant in Participants Who Did/Did Not Receive Leuprolide Following Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)

B cell percentage is defined as the percentage of lymphocytes that are B cells. (NCT01338987)
Timeframe: after first Bone Marrow Transplant, approximately 12 months post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of cells (Median)
Males that received leuprolideMales that did not receive leuprolideFemales who all received leuprolide
Transplant Recipient22.121.914.3

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)

Here is the count of participants with serious and non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned. (NCT01338987)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 79 months and 11 days.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Males That Did Not Receive Leuprolide for 1st Transplant10
Males Randomized to Receive Leuprolide for 1st Transplant8
Females That Received Leuprolide for 1st Transplant20
Matched Related Donors for Transplant4
Recipients of 2nd Transplant2

[back to top]

Comparison of Lutineizing Hormone (LH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study. (NCT01343368)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Interventional - Received Leuprolide19.8
Observational Arm6.8

[back to top]

Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels. (NCT01343368)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Interventional - Received Leuprolide9.3
Observational Arm4.4

[back to top]

Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels. (NCT01343368)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Observational Arm7.1

[back to top]

Comparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After Transplant

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average AMH levels after receiving transplant. (NCT01343368)
Timeframe: Day Prior to Transplant

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Interventional - Received Leuprolide0.6
Observational Arm6.4

[back to top]

Comparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After Transplant

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average AMH levels after receiving transplant. (NCT01343368)
Timeframe: Day 180 after Transplant

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Interventional - Received Leuprolide0.08

[back to top]

Comparison of Number of Patients With Ovarian Failure

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Ovarian failure rate is based on FSH measured at 180 days after HCT; to determine the effect of GnRH agonists on the incidence of ovarian failure (i.e. FSH >40 IU/L) after transplant. (NCT01343368)
Timeframe: Through Day 180 Post Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Interventional - Received Leuprolide3
Observational Arm1

[back to top]

Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels. (NCT01343368)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Interventional - Received Leuprolide61.5
Observational Arm48.8

[back to top]

Comparison of Number of Patients Who Stopped Menstrual Bleeding

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Count of patients who stopped menstrual bleeding; to determine how the effect of GnRH agonists are at suppressing menses during hematopoietic cell transplant (NCT01343368)
Timeframe: From Baseline Through Day 365

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Interventional - Received Leuprolide2
Observational Arm0

[back to top]

Comparison of Number of Patients Who Resumed Menstrual Cycles

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Count of patients who resumed menses after hematopoietic cell transplant (NCT01343368)
Timeframe: Day 365 Post Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Interventional - Received Leuprolide2
Observational Arm4

[back to top]

Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study. (NCT01343368)
Timeframe: Day 180

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Interventional - Received Leuprolide31.1
Observational Arm4.3

[back to top]

Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study. (NCT01343368)
Timeframe: Day 100

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Interventional - Received Leuprolide2.4
Observational Arm6.4

[back to top]

Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study. (NCT01343368)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Interventional - Received Leuprolide31.9
Observational Arm27.8

[back to top]

Comparison of Leuprolide Hormone (LH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study. (NCT01343368)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Observational Arm5.6

[back to top]

Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels. (NCT01343368)
Timeframe: Day 180

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Interventional - Received Leuprolide47.0
Observational Arm4.7

[back to top]

Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels. (NCT01343368)
Timeframe: Day 100

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Interventional - Received Leuprolide18.4
Observational Arm9.1

[back to top]

The Number of Clonal Expansion of Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) T-cells

"CD8 T-cells are known as cytotoxic T-cells or killer T-cells. When the resting CD8 T-cells are activated, the activated CD8 T-cells multiple to fight a specific target so creating a group of specifically activated T-cells. This test measured the minimal number of clonal expansions of CD8 T-cells that always preceded an adverse response to treatment that was due to increased activity in the immune system itself. The minimal number of clonal expansion points to what this increased activity in the immune system might look like." (NCT01377389)
Timeframe: Each evaluable patient was followed from the time of their first dose until 30 days after their last dose of study drug

Interventionclonal expansions (Number)
Ipilimumab and Androgen Depravation55

[back to top]

Time to Progression of Disease (PD) Off Androgen Depravation Therapy (ADT), After Treatment With Intermittent ADT Plus Ipilimumab.

The number of months after the last ADT dose until the PSA progression (NCT01377389)
Timeframe: 2 to 45 months

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Ipilimumab and Androgen Depravation8.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival of patients treated with intermittent ADT and ipilimumab in months. (NCT01377389)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any case, whichever came first, assessed up to 70 months.

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Ipilimumab and Androgen Depravation36

[back to top]

Time to Testosterone Recovery (> 50ng/mL) in Patients Treated With Intermittent ADT Plus Ipilimumab.

The presence of testosterone was followed in each patient from the start of treatment until the testosterone lab test was found to be at a value greater than 50ng/mL. (NCT01377389)
Timeframe: 1 month up to 7 months.

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Ipilimumab and Androgen Depravation3.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Progressed After 7 Months of Being on Treatment

Anti-tumor activity assessed through serial PSA measurements (blood tests) at 7 months on treatment. Progression defined as two consecutive PSA values increasing by at least 20% or more from the lowest PSA value for each patient. (NCT01377389)
Timeframe: at the end of 7 months on treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PSA progression at 7 monthsNo PSA progression at 7 months
Ipilimumab and Androgen Depravation618

[back to top] [back to top]

Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Concentrations

"For purposes of calculating summary statistics, any concentration values Below Limit Quantification (BLQ) were to be assigned ½ the Low Limit Quantification (LLOQ) (LLOQ=0.36). If the calculated mean, median or minimum value at a time point was less than LLOQ, BLQ is presented. In addition, since a high proportion of BLQ values may affect the Standard Deviation (SD); if more than 50% of values were imputed, then no mean or median was calculated for that time point." (NCT01415960)
Timeframe: 168 days

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
BaselineDay 168
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg Depot44.362.37

[back to top]

Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)

"For purposes of calculating summary statistics, any concentration values Below Limit of Quantification (BLQ) were to be assigned ½ the Low Limit of Quantification (LLOQ) (LLOQ=3.66). If the calculated mean, median or minimum value at a time point was less than LLOQ, BLQ is presented. In addition, since a high proportion of BLQ values may affect the Standard Deviation (SD); if more than 50% of values were imputed, then no mean or median was to be calculated for that time point." (NCT01415960)
Timeframe: 168 days

InterventionmIU/mL (Mean)
BaselineDay 28Day 168
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg Depot15.1415.80

[back to top]

Determination of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)

"For purposes of calculating summary statistics, any concentration values Below Limit of Quantification (BLQ) were to be assigned ½ the Low Limit of Quantification (LLOQ) (LLOQ=2.00). If the calculated mean, median or minimum value at a time point was less than LLOQ, BLQ is presented. In addition, since a high proportion of BLQ values may affect the Standard Deviation (SD); if more than 50% of values were imputed, then no mean or median was calculated for that time point." (NCT01415960)
Timeframe: 168 days

InterventionmIU/mL (Mean)
BaselineDay 28Day 168
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg Depot7.2411

[back to top]

Safety Endpoints

"The WHO/ECOG, bone pain, urinary pain and urinary symptoms data reported are the most frequent percentage at the assessment time.~The WHO/ECOG performance status was summarized using the 0 to 4 WHO/ECOG performance status scale. (0= fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performances without restriction).~Bone pain, urinary pain and urinary symptoms were determined using a 10-point scale (1= no pain/symptoms, 10= worst pain/symptom imaginable)." (NCT01415960)
Timeframe: 168 Days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline WHO/ECOG Score 0 (n=161)Day 168 WHO/ECOG Scores 0 (n=152)Baseline Bone Pain score 1 (n=161)Day 168 Bone Pain score 1 (n=152)Baseline Urinary Pain score 1 (n=161)Day 168 Urinary Pain Score 1 (n=152)Baseline Urinary Symptoms score 1 (n=161)Day 168 Urinary Symptoms score 1 (n=152)
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg Depot83.982.995.094.198.897.487.689.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Chemical Castration (Defined as Testosterone Levels ≤ 0.5 ng/mL) at Days 28, 84, and 168.

The primary endpoint was testosterone ≤ 0.5 ng/mL assessed on Days 28, 84, and 168. Thereby, maintenance of castration was to be demonstrated through Day 168 with no missing data at these key time points, unless the missing data were due to an event unrelated to the study drug (ITT patients). (NCT01415960)
Timeframe: 168 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg Depot98.1

[back to top]

Determination of Leuprolide Tmax

Leuprolide Pharmacokinetic Parameters (PK Population). (NCT01415960)
Timeframe: 84 days

Interventionday (Mean)
Day 0/Dose 1 TmaxDay 84/Dose 2 Tmax
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg Depot0.070.08

[back to top]

Determination of Leuprolide Cmax

Leuprolide Pharmacokinetic Parameters (PK Population). (NCT01415960)
Timeframe: Cmax1: 0, 1 and 4 hours post-dose on Day 0 and once on Days 2, 14, 28, 56; Cmax2: 0, 1 and 4 hours post-dose on Day 84 and once on Days 86, 112 and 168.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 0/Dose 1 CmaxDay 84/Dose 2 Cmax
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg Depot46.7948.30

[back to top]

Immune Response at Month 24 as Evaluated by IFN-γ ELISPOT Specific for PA2024

Immune response at month 24 as evaluated by IFN-γ ELISPOT specific for PA2024 following sipuleucel-T/ADT treatment regimens to determine if order of administration impacted immune response. (NCT01431391)
Timeframe: PA2024 ELISPOT counts at Month 24

InterventionIFN-γ ELISPOT (per 300,000 PBMC) (Mean)
Arm 1: Sipuleucel-T Followed by ADT81.0
Arm 2: ADT Followed by Sipuleucel-T61.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Immune Response As Evaluated by IFN-γ ELISPOT Specific for PA2024

A participant was considered to have an immune response it the post-baseline PA2024-specific IFN-g ELISPOT count was >18 (NCT01431391)
Timeframe: Month 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 1:Sipuleucel-T Followed by ADT88
Arm 2: ADT Followed by Sipuleucel-T85

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Having Adverse Events

Any donor having a serious complication such as severe hyperstimulation syndrome, ovarian torsion, infection or peritoneal bleeding will be recorded (NCT01443546)
Timeframe: 1 month

Interventionparticipants (Number)
hCG Trigger0
Dual Trigger1
Lupron Trigger0

[back to top]

Incidence of Detecting Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC)

To determine the feasibility of detecting circulating tumor cells in this patient population. CTC results per patient in milliliters. (NCT01531205)
Timeframe: One Year

,
InterventionCTC/mL (Number)
Baseline CTC/mL1 Month CTC/mL3 Month CTC/mLBaseline CTC Clusters/mL1 Month CTC Clusters/mL3 Month CTC Clusters/mLBaseline Apop/mL1 Month Apop/mL3 Month Apop/mLBaseline Small Cells/mL1 Month Small Cells/mL3 Month Small Cells/mLBaseline CK-CTC/mL1 Month CK-CTC/mL3 Month CK-CTC/mL
Participant One212710281110003018
Participant Two16NA02NA14NA00NA01NA

[back to top]

Incidence of Perioperative and Postoperative Morbidity

Number of events. To access the perioperative and postoperative morbidity with salvage surgery after neoadjuvant hormonal ablation and Cabazitaxel. (NCT01531205)
Timeframe: One Year

Interventionevents (Number)
Experimental: Drug and Hormonal Therapy With Salvage Surgery0

[back to top]

Incidence of PSA Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Percentage of participants with stable (has not increased) or undetectable PSA post surgery. To assess Prostate-specific antigen(PSA)-progression free survival and prostate cancer specific survival for patients treated by chemohormonal therapy followed by salvage surgery for biopsy proven androgen-dependent high-risk locally recurrent prostate cancer following radiation therapy. (NCT01531205)
Timeframe: Four Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental: Drug and Hormonal Therapy With Salvage Surgery0

[back to top]

Incidence of Complete Response (CR)

Percentage of participants with CR post surgery. To evaluate the pathological complete response rate to androgen ablation plus Cabazitaxel in patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer following radiation therapy. Pathological Complete Response (pCR): Participants with no residual cancer in the local resection specimen and pelvic lymph nodes will be considered pCR. (NCT01531205)
Timeframe: One Year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental: Drug and Hormonal Therapy With Salvage Surgery0

[back to top]

Surgical Margin Negative Rate (SM Rate)

Post surgery percentage of participants with negative surgical margin. To determine the surgical margin negative rate in patients who have undergone chemohormonal therapy followed by surgery for biopsy proven androgen-dependent high risk locally recurrent prostate cancer following primary radiation therapy. Margin: The edge or border of the tissue removed in cancer surgery. The margin is described as negative or clean when the pathologist finds no cancer cells at the edge of the tissue, suggesting that all of the cancer has been removed. The margin is described as positive or involved when the pathologist finds cancer cells at the edge of the tissue, suggesting that all of the cancer has not been removed. (NCT01531205)
Timeframe: One Year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental: Drug and Hormonal Therapy With Salvage Surgery100

[back to top]

Total to HDL Cholesterol Ratio

(NCT01546454)
Timeframe: Entire Study

InterventionTotal to HDL Cholesterol Ratio (Mean)
Non-steroidal Effects0.146
Contraceptive Effects0.148
Steroid Effects-0.89

[back to top]

Time Course of Changes in Serum Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)

(NCT01546623)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 48

,
InterventionmIU/mL (Median)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24Week 25Week 26Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week 44Week 48
TAP-144-SR(3M)4.7804.8104.7104.9505.2405.1105.3705.2605.1504.9705.0205.0705.0304.9704.9104.9904.820
TAP-144-SR(6M)5.1205.4304.8904.6255.2255.3405.3005.0304.9905.2105.0105.0605.2105.5855.1005.1505.110

[back to top]

Time Course of Changes in Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)

(NCT01546623)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 48

,
InterventionmIU/mL (Median)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24Week 25Week 26Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week 44Week 48
TAP-144-SR(3M)0.0000.2200.1500.1100.0000.1100.0550.1100.0000.1850.1300.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
TAP-144-SR(6M)0.0000.1600.1800.1200.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.1500.1700.1100.0000.0000.0000.0000.000

[back to top]

Time Course of Changes in Serum Testosterone

(NCT01546623)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 48

,
Interventionng/dL (Median)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24Week 25Week 26Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week 44Week 48
TAP-144-SR(3M)7.07.06.08.08.08.07.56.06.05.54.06.08.07.08.08.06.0
TAP-144-SR(6M)8.06.07.07.07.57.07.08.07.06.05.08.09.08.08.07.09.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression by PSA (FAS)

"Evaluation according to the Criteria for therapeutic effect from the General Rule for Clinical Pathological Studies on Prostate Cancer, 4th edition (determination of therapeutic effect by PSA)" (NCT01546623)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 48

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Presence of disesase progression: YesPresence of disesase progression: No
TAP-144-SR(3M)92.593.5
TAP-144-SR(6M)7.56.5

[back to top]

Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level

(NCT01546623)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 48

,
Interventionng/dL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24Week 25Week 26Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week 44Week 48
TAP-144-SR(3M)0.061880.18690.13350.11320.083740.080390.12200.084500.074370.19780.14180.10670.082360.084070.10860.086390.07945
TAP-144-SR(6M)0.071130.13040.30850.88450.17920.12560.10240.069570.051670.13530.43180.76220.15240.10910.091180.069580.04596

[back to top]

Soft Tissue Response

"Assessment in accordance with the criteria for therapeutic effect from the General Rule for Clinical Pathological Studies on Prostate Cancer, 4th edition. Soft tissue response was evaluated in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by CT or MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR." (NCT01546623)
Timeframe: At week 48

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Complete responsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseNot Evaluable
TAP-144-SR(3M)0.00.011.82.685.5
TAP-144-SR(6M)0.00.013.90.086.1

[back to top]

12-lead ECG

(NCT01546623)
Timeframe: At 1 hour, week 24, and week 48 after administration

,
Interventionmsec (Mean)
QTcF interval measurement at BaslineQTcF interval measurement at 1 hourQTcF interval measurement at Week 24QTcF interval measurement at Week 48
TAP-144-SR(3M)436.2432.2433.4431.7
TAP-144-SR(6M)429.0422.2425.0428.1

[back to top]

The Maximum Rate of Change in PSA Suppression (FAS)

"Evaluation according to the Criteria for therapeutic effect from the General Rule for Clinical Pathological Studies on Prostate Cancer, 4th edition (determination of therapeutic effect by PSA)" (NCT01546623)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 48

Interventionpercent change (Median)
TAP-144-SR(6M)-86.225
TAP-144-SR(3M)-67.030

[back to top]

Bone Lesion Response

"Partially revised assessment based on the criteria for therapeutic effect from the General Rule for Clinical and Pathological Studies on Prostate Canter, 4th edition. Response is measured using bone scintigraphy. Increase in new (2 or more) bone lesion is considered as progression" (NCT01546623)
Timeframe: At Week 48

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Presence of disesase progression: New lesions ≥ 2Presence of disesase progression: New lesions < 1
TAP-144-SR(3M)1.398.7
TAP-144-SR(6M)1.398.7

[back to top]

Time Course of Change Rate in Serum PSA (FAS)

"Evaluation according to the Criteria for therapeutic effect from the General Rule for Clinical Pathological Studies on Prostate Cancer, 4th edition (determination of therapeutic effect by prostate-specific antigen [PSA])" (NCT01546623)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 48

,
Interventionpercent change (Median)
Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week44Week 48
TAP-144-SR(3M)-10.000-15.880-21.130-20.650-39.970-31.110-45.875-40.745-50.520-58.520-54.585-59.400
TAP-144-SR(6M)-7.930-14.255-20.810-19.720-44.740-49.270-56.705-57.690-60.710-80.610-74.105-72.900

[back to top]

The Rate of Suppression of Serum Testosterone to Castrate Level

Comparison of the proportion of patients maintained at castration level (≤100 ng/dL) (NCT01546623)
Timeframe: From the start of study drug administration through Week 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Number of participants maintainedNumber of participants who did not maintain
TAP-144-SR(3M)781
TAP-144-SR(6M)810

[back to top]

Concentration of Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH)

This measure indicates serum LH concentration at baseline and post-baseline time points. It was measured in milli-international units per milliliter (mIU/mL). (NCT01546649)
Timeframe: Baseline, Hour 1, 3, 6 on Day 1, Day 2, 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 176, 183, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309, 337, 421, 505, 589 and 673

,
InterventionmIU/mL (Median)
Baseline [N=83;84]Day1 (1hr) [N=82;84]Day1 (3hr) [N=24;21]Day1 (6hr) [N=24;21]Day2 [N=83;84]Day3 [N=83;84]Day4 [N=83;84]Week 1 (Day8) [N=83;84]Week 2 (Day15) [N=83;84]Week 3 (Day22) [N=83;84]Week 4 (Day29) [N=83;84]Week 8 (Day57) [N=83;84]Week 12 (Day85) [N=83;83]Week 16 (Day113) [N=82;82]Week 20 (Day141) [N=81;82]Week 24 (Day169) [N=80;81]Week 25 (Day176) [N=79;80]Week 26 (Day183) [N=79;80]Week 28 (Day197) [N=75;77]Week 32 (Day225) [N=78;80]Week 36 (Day253) [N=79;80]Week 40 (Day281) [N=78;80]Week 44 (Day309) [N=77;80]Week 48 (Day337) [N=77;80]Week 60 (Day421) [N=77;79]Week 72 (Day505) [N=77;78]Week 84 (Day589) [N=76;77]Week 96 (Day673) [N=75;75]
TAP-144-SR (3M)4.49030.58563.26061.21019.75510.5009.3754.4751.9901.0850.8450.5700.5200.4300.4050.4600.4550.4050.4100.4400.3950.3900.3850.4150.4400.4200.4100.360
TAP-144-SR (6M)4.25027.73088.02064.75014.9907.3105.8303.1902.4601.0200.5400.2700.2200.2450.2400.2900.4500.4100.2700.2800.2500.2400.2500.2500.2500.2600.2300.210

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS) Rate at Week 96

DFS is defined as time from randomization to earliest day of onset the events, recurrence [including recurrence in the ipsilateral breast], secondary cancer [including breast cancer in the contralateral breast] and death. DFS at Week 96 was defined as the percentage, calculated with Kaplan-Meier method, of participants did not experience any events at Week 96 since the randomization. (NCT01546649)
Timeframe: Week 96

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAP-144-SR (6M)97.3
TAP-144-SR (3M)97.5

[back to top]

Distant Disease Free Survival (DDFS) Rate at Week 96

DDFS is defined as time from randomization to earliest day of onset the events, distant recurrence, secondary cancer [including breast cancer in the contralateral breast] and death. DDFS at week 96 was defined as the percentage calculated with Kaplan-Meier method, of participants did not experience any events at week 96 since the randomization. (NCT01546649)
Timeframe: Week 96

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAP-144-SR (6M)98.5
TAP-144-SR (3M)98.8

[back to top]

Concentration of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)

This measure indicates serum FSH concentration at baseline and post-baseline time points. (NCT01546649)
Timeframe: Baseline, Hour 1, 3, 6 on Day 1, Day 2, 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 176, 183, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309, 337, 421, 505, 589 and 673

,
InterventionmIU/mL (Median)
Baseline [N=83;84]Day1 (1hr) [N=82;84]Day1 (3hr) [N=24;21]Day1 (6hr) [N=24;21]Day2 [N=83;84]Day3 [N=83;84]Day4 [N=83;84]Week 1 (Day8) [N=83;84]Week 2 (Day15) [N=83;84]Week 3 (Day22) [N=83;84]Week 4 (Day29) [N=83;84]Week 8 (Day57) [N=83;84]Week 12 (Day85) [N=83;83]Week 16 (Day113) [N=82;82]Week 20 (Day141) [N=81;82]Week 24 (Day169) [N=80;81]Week 25 (Day176) [N=79;80]Week 26 (Day183) [N=79;80]Week 28 (Day197) [N=75;77]Week 32 (Day225) [N=78;80]Week 36 (Day253) [N=79;80]Week 40 (Day281) [N=78;80]Week 44 (Day309) [N=77;80]Week 48 (Day337) [N=77;80]Week 60 (Day421) [N=77;79]Week 72 (Day505) [N=77;78]Week 84 (Day589) [N=76;77]Week 96 (Day673) [N=75;75]
TAP-144-SR (3M)5.60510.00019.95025.34012.5156.7805.5853.0351.7051.5702.0152.3452.2401.8301.9052.0001.6001.7001.6901.9802.0351.7101.8251.8851.9101.9201.8401.740
TAP-144-SR (6M)5.0709.52023.32527.46010.0806.1806.1003.9201.8201.2201.2001.3901.4901.6351.7802.0601.9401.5601.3101.5951.6601.7351.9301.9201.5301.7301.5001.620

[back to top]

Concentration of Serum E2

The measure indicates serum E2 concentration at baseline and post-baseline time points. (NCT01546649)
Timeframe: Baseline, Hour (hr) 1, 3, 6 on Day 1, Day 2, 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 176, 183, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309, 337, 421, 505, 589 and 673

,
Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Baseline [N=83;84]Day1 (1hr) [N=82;84]Day1 (3hr) [N=24;21]Day1 (6hr) [N=24;21]Day2 [N=83;84]Day3 [N=83;84]Day4 [N=83;84]Week 1 (Day8) [N=83;84]Week 2 (Day15) [N=83;84]Week 3 (Day22) [N=83;84]Week 4 (Day29) [N=83;84]Week 8 (Day57) [N=83;84]Week 12 (Day85) [N=83;83]Week 16 (Day113) [N=82;82]Week 20 (Day141) [N=81;82]Week 24 (Day169) [N=80;81]Week 25 (Day176) [N=79;80]Week 26 (Day183) [N=79;80]Week 28 (Day197) [N=75;77]Week 32 (Day225) [N=78;80]Week 36 (Day253) [N=79;80]Week 40 (Day281) [N=78;80]Week 44 (Day309) [N=77;80]Week 48 (Day337) [N=77;80]Week 60 (Day421) [N=77;79]Week 72 (Day505) [N=77;78]Week 84 (Day589) [N=76;77]Week 96 (Day673) [N=75;75]
TAP-144-SR (3M)99110.564.099.0115.587.5110.0112.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
TAP-144-SR (6M)9594.5102.0153.5146.0100.0108.056.013.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

QT Interval Measured by 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

12-lead electrocardiography measurement was performed in supine position after 5 minutes at rest. Each measurement was recorded continuously for 10 seconds at the recording speed of 25 millimeter/second (mm/second). (NCT01546649)
Timeframe: Baseline, Hour 1, 3, 6 on Day 1, Day 29, 85, 169 and 337

,
Interventionmillisecond (msec) (Mean)
Baseline [N=83;84]Day1 (1hr) [N=83;84]Day1 (3hr) [N=24;21]Day1 (6hr) [N=24;21]Week 4 (Day29) [N=83;84]Week 12 (Day85) [N=83;84]Week 24 (Day169) [N=81;82]Week 48 (Day337) [N=77;80]
TAP-144-SR (3M)420.9417.1423.7424.1432.3432.3429.0431.4
TAP-144-SR (6M)421.5417.8416.8415.8431.2433.3431.0430.0

[back to top]

Serum Unchanged TAP-144 Level

This measure indicates the unchanged TAP-144 level in serum. (NCT01546649)
Timeframe: Baseline, Hour 1, 3, 6 on Day 1, Day 2, 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 176, 183, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309 and 337

,
Interventionnanogram per deciliter (ng/dL) (Mean)
Baseline [N=83;84]Day1 (1hr) [N=82;84]Day1 (3hr) [N=24;19]Day1 (6hr) [N=24;21]Day2 [N=83;84]Day3 [N=83;84]Day4 [N=83;84]Week 1 (Day8) [N=82;83]Week 2 (Day15) [N=82;84]Week 3 (Day22) [N=83;84]Week 4 (Day29) [N=83;83]Week 8 (Day57) [N=83;83]Week 12 (Day85) [N=83;83]Week 16 (Day113) [N=82;82]Week 20 (Day141) [N=81;82]Week 24 (Day169) [N=80;81]Week 25 (Day176) [N=79;80]Week 26 (Day183) [N=79;80]Week 28 (Day197) [N=80;80]Week 32 (Day225) [N=78;80]Week 36 (Day253) [N=79;80]Week 40 (Day281) [N=79;80]Week 44 (Day309) [N=77;80]Week 48 (Day337) [N=77;80]
TAP-144-SR (3M)0.00028.4520.278.0370.47490.24920.22730.10500.088670.064710.049710.047440.060280.093470.071650.076340.15830.11090.084680.068810.062590.081630.064790.06313
TAP-144-SR (6M)0.0005.2932.5381.0390.14010.028890.023800.091150.37020.72850.34420.11460.080510.057750.039410.029310.11280.33270.46870.13770.085210.060730.43390.02957

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Suppressive Effect of Serum Estradiol (E2) to Menopausal Level (=<30 pg/mL) From Week 4 Through Week 48

Comparison of both the treatment groups was done by assessing the suppressive effect on serum E2 concentration maintained at menopausal level (=<30pg/mL). Suppression rate was calculated as proportion of participants maintained at menopausal level. (NCT01546649)
Timeframe: Week 4 up to Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAP-144-SR (6M)97.6
TAP-144-SR (3M)96.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol)

Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from secondary (original protocol) to primary. Biochemical failure will be defined by the Phoenix definition (PSA ≥ 2 ng/ml over the nadir PSA, the presence of local, regional, or distant recurrence, or the initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT17.3
TAK-700 + ADT + RT12.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Death Due to Prostate Cancer

Time to prostate cancer death is defined as time from randomization to the date of death due to prostate cancer, last known follow-up (censored), or death due to other causes (competing risk). Failure rates were to be estimated using the cumulative incidence method. If too few events occur for meaningful estimates, then only counts of events will be reported. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ADT + RT1
TAK-700 + ADT + RT0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastases

Distant metastases (failure) is defined as imaging or biopsy demonstrated evidence for systemic recurrence. Biopsy was not required, however it was encouraged in absence of a rising PSA. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. Note, the protocol lists this endpoint as regional or distant metastasis, but regional progression data was not collected. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT6.8
TAK-700 + ADT + RT2.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With General Clinical Treatment Failure

General clinical treatment failure (GCTF) is defined as: PSA > 25 ng/ml, documented local disease progression, regional or distant metastasis, or initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Failure time is defined as time from registration to the date of failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT12.5
TAK-700 + ADT + RT6.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events

Time to grade 3 or higher adverse event (event) is defined as time from randomization to the date of first event, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Event rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT34.9
TAK-700 + ADT + RT58.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Local Progression

Local recurrence (failure) is defined as biopsy proven recurrence within the prostate gland. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates reported.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT2.9
TAK-700 + ADT + RT0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Alive [Overall Survival] (Primary Endpoint of Original Protocol)

Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from primary (original protocol) to secondary. Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. 5-year rates are provided. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT89.4
TAK-700 + ADT + RT88.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)

Body Mass Index (BMI) is a person's weight in kilograms (or pounds) divided by the square of height in meters (or feet). Change from baseline = time point value - baseline value. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline and yearly to five years.

,
Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
1 year2 years3 years4 years5 years
ADT + RT0.640.670.75-0.02-0.52
TAK-700 + ADT + RT-0.84-0.340.250.460.15

[back to top]

Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One Year

The EPIC-Short Form is a 26-item, validated self-administered tool to assess disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and its therapies consisting of five summary domains (bowel, urinary incontinence, urinary irritation/obstruction, sexual, and hormonal function). Responses for each item form a Likert scale which are transformed to a 0-100 scale. A domain score is the average of the transformed domain item scores, ranging from 0-100 with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Change at one year is defined as one-year value - baseline value. Positive change at one year indicates improved quality of life. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, one year

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Bowel domainUrinary domainSexual domainHormonal domain
ADT + RT-5.45-1.67-24.18-17.31
TAK-700 + ADT + RT-7.04-5.31-27.26-17.45

[back to top]

Fasting Plasma Glucose

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT98.99102.27104.24
TAK-700 + ADT + RT100.52117.39105.51

[back to top]

Fasting Total Cholesterol

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT149.71160.27163.20
TAK-700 + ADT + RT154.20154.74160.61

[back to top]

Hemoglobin A1c

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

,
Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT6.126.336.30
TAK-700 + ADT + RT6.015.956.04

[back to top]

Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From registration to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Garde 4Grade 5
ADT + RT17543143
TAK-700 + ADT + RT2455591

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Clinical Survivorship Events

"Clinical survivorship events are defined as the following newly diagnosed non-fatal cardiovascular events or other clinical endpoints relevant to prostate cancer survivorship:~type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and osteoporotic fracture." (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Type 2 diabetesCoronary artery diseaseMyocardial infarctionStrokePulmonary embolismDeep vein thrombosisOsteoporotic fracture
ADT + RT3016651086
TAK-700 + ADT + RT181486571

[back to top]

Serum High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT40.9144.9442.16
TAK-700 + ADT + RT41.3244.5044.85

[back to top]

Serum High-density Lipoprotein (LDL)

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT88.7886.1881.35
TAK-700 + ADT + RT87.8583.7395.34

[back to top]

Serum Testosterone

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline,12 months, 24 months

,
Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT355.7535.6886.47
TAK-700 + ADT + RT357.7325.2217.36

[back to top]

Testosterone Recovery at 12 and 24 Months

Testosterone recovery is defined as testosterone level after treatment greater than 230 ng/dL. Time to testosterone recovery is defined as time from randomization to the date of testosterone recovery, biochemical, local, or distant failure (competing risk), salvage therapy (competing risk), death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Testosterone recovery rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From registration to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 months24 months
ADT + RT19.432.9
TAK-700 + ADT + RT12.517.4

[back to top]

Median Testosterone Recovery Time

Testosterone recovery is defined as testosterone level after treatment greater than 230 ng/dL. Testosterone recovery rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, censoring for biochemical, local, or distant failure, salvage therapy, death, and otherwise alive without event. Testosterone recovery time is defined as time from randomization to testosterone recovery or censoring. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionyears (Median)
ADT + RTNA
TAK-700 + ADT + RTNA

[back to top]

Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form at One Year

The PROMIS Fatigue short form 8a contains 8 questions, each with 5 responses ranging from 1 to 5, evaluating self-reported fatigue symptoms over the past 7 days. The total score is the sum of all questions which is then converted into a pro-rated T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with a possible range of 33.1 to 77.8. Higher scores indicate more fatigue. Change is defined as value at one year - value at baseline. Positive change from baseline indicates increased fatigue at one year. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, one year

InterventionT-score (Mean)
ADT + RT2.78
TAK-700 + ADT + RT3.16

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Extracapsular Extension: Local Review

To determine the percentage of participants with extracapsular extension at prostatectomy as assessed by the local pathologist. Extracapsular extension was defined as prostate cancer cells when extended into the prostate capsule or outer lining of the prostate gland. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride26.1
Enzalutamide36.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Positive Surgical Margins

To determine the percentage of participants with positive surgical margins at prostatectomy as assessed by the local and central pathologist. Surgical margin, also known as tumor free margin referred to the visible normal tissue or skin margin that was removed with the surgical excision of a tumor, growth, or malignancy. The margin was described as positive when the pathologist finds cancer cells at the edge of the tissue, suggesting that all of the cancer has not been removed. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Local pathologistCentral pathologist
Enzalutamide12.016.0
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride4.321.7

[back to top]

Pharmacodynamic Effects: Assessment of Androgen Receptor Signaling as Measured by Intensity of Androgen Receptor Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining

To determine the effects of triplet therapy and enzalutamide alone on androgen receptor signaling in prostatectomy specimens. Androgen receptor (AR) was a type of nuclear receptor that was activated by binding either of the androgenic hormones, testosterone, or dihydrotestosterone in the cytoplasm and then translocating into the nucleus. Androgen receptor (AR) signaling represented the major therapeutic target for treating metastatic prostate cancer. Assessment of androgen receptor signaling was measured by intensity of androgen receptor IHC staining and were graded as 0 (absent), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate) and 3 (strong). Percentage of participants within each grade are reported below. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
0123
Enzalutamide0.00.05.394.7
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0.05.627.866.7

[back to top]

Pharmacodynamic Effects: Tissue Testosterone

To determine pharmacodynamic effects as measured by the amount of tissue testosterone in prostatectomy specimens following radical prostatectomy. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionpicogram per milligram (Mean)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0.18
Enzalutamide0.90

[back to top]

Pharmacodynamic Effects: Tissue Dihydrotestosterone (DHT)

To determine pharmacodynamic effects as measured by the amount of tissue DHT in prostatectomy specimens following radical prostatectomy. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionpicogram per milligram (Mean)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0.04
Enzalutamide3.34

[back to top]

Pharmacodynamic Effects: Assessment of Mitotic Index

Assessment was performed to determine the effects of triplet therapy and enzalutamide alone on mitotic index. Mitotic index was defined as the ratio between the numbers of cells in a population undergoing mitosis to the number of cells in a population not undergoing mitosis in prostatectomy specimens. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionratio (Mean)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0.9
Enzalutamide2.6

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) That Led to Dose Interruption, Dose Reduction, and Study Drug Discontinuation

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 210 days

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Permanent Discontinuation of EnzalutamideTemporary Interruption of EnzalutamideDose Reduction of EnzalutamideStudy Drug Discontinuation
Enzalutamide0000
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0300

[back to top]

Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Nadir

To determine the effects on PSA as measured by the lowest post baseline PSA value prior to prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was a protein produced by normal, as well as malignant, cells of the prostate gland. The PSA nadir was the participant's lowest observed post baseline PSA value. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 195

Interventionmicrogram per liter (mcg/L) (Median)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0.04
Enzalutamide0.51

[back to top]

Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT): Baseline

(NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0.34
Enzalutamide0.29

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Extracapsular Extension: Central Review

To determine the percentage of participants with extracapsular extension at prostatectomy as assessed by the central pathologist. Extracapsular extension was defined as prostate cancer cells when extended into the prostate capsule or outer lining of the prostate gland. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride56.5
Enzalutamide70.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone at Day 180

To determine serum hormone effects as measured by change in testosterone at baseline and at completion of therapy. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride-4.00
Enzalutamide5.74

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at Day 180

To determine serum hormone effects as measured by change in DHT values from baseline to the completion of therapy. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride-0.33
Enzalutamide0.25

[back to top]

Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT): Day 180

(NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0.01
Enzalutamide0.51

[back to top]

Serum Testosterone: Baseline

(NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride4.10
Enzalutamide3.69

[back to top]

Serum Testosterone: Day 180

(NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0.12
Enzalutamide9.76

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Nadir

To determine the effects on PSA as measured by the time to the lowest post baseline PSA value prior to prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was a protein produced by normal, as well as malignant, cells of the prostate gland. The PSA nadir was the participant's lowest observed post baseline PSA value. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 195

Interventiondays (Median)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride5.09
Enzalutamide6.01

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Reduction in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)

To determine the effects on PSA as measured by the percentage of participants with PSA less than (<) 0.2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL), and a 50 percent (%) and 90% decrease in PSA value prior to prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was a protein produced by normal, as well as malignant, cells of the prostate gland. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 195

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PSA < 0.2 ng/mL50% decrease in PSA90% decrease in PSA
Enzalutamide29.6100.063.0
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride92.0100.0100.0

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Pathologic Complete Response Rate

Pathologic complete response rate was defined as percentage of participants with pathologic complete response. Pathologic complete response rate following triplet therapy (enzalutamide in combination with leuprolide and dutasteride) and enzalutamide alone when administered as neoadjuvant therapy for 180 days prior to prostatectomy in participants with localized prostate cancer. Pathologic complete response was defined as the absence of morphologically identifiable carcinoma in the prostatectomy specimen, as assessed by the local and central pathologist. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Local pathologistCentral pathologist
Enzalutamide0.00.0
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride8.74.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Positive Lymph Nodes

To determine the percentage of participants with positive lymph nodes at prostatectomy as assessed by the local and central pathologist. Lymph nodes were small clumps of immune cells that act as filters for the lymphatic system. Lymph nodes with cancer cells in them were called positive lymph nodes. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Local pathologistCentral pathologist
Enzalutamide4.04.0
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride26.126.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Positive Seminal Vesicles

To determine the percentage of participants with positive seminal vesicles at prostatectomy as assessed by the local and central pathologist. Seminal vesicles or seminal glands, were defined as a pair of simple tubular glands located within the pelvis. They secrete fluid that partly composes the semen. Seminal vesicles with cancer cells in them were called positive seminal vesicles. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Local pathologistCentral pathologist
Enzalutamide36.036.0
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride30.430.4

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

Kaplan-Meier OS will be measured from the date that study therapy was commenced until the date of death. (NCT01642186)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A Everolimus12.5
Arm B Letrozole Plus Leuprolide14.0
Arm C Combination Everolimus, Letrozole and Leuprolide10.6

[back to top]

Median PFS

Kaplan-Meier PFS will be measured from the date that study therapy is initiated until the date of first evidence of radiographic disease progression, global clinical deterioration as determined by study investigators, or death. (NCT01642186)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A Everolimus2.6
Arm B Letrozole Plus Leuprolide2.7
Arm C Combination Everolimus, Letrozole and Leuprolide2.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With One or More Adverse Events/Toxicity

Adverse events/toxicity will be monitored and recorded using the CTCAE version 4.0 and summarized descriptively. (NCT01642186)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A Everolimus9
Arm B Letrozole Plus Leuprolide9
Arm C Combination Everolimus, Letrozole and Leuprolide10

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease

Objective responses will be reported using RECIST guidelines (version 1.1). Objective response will be estimated using binomial proportions and exact 95% CIs will be provided. Stable Disease is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage (compared to baseline) to qualify for Partial Reponse nor sufficient increase (taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study) to qualify for Progressive Disease. (NCT01642186)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionPercentage of pts with stable disease (Number)
Arm A Everolimus55
Arm B Letrozole Plus Leuprolide37
Arm C Combination Everolimus, Letrozole and Leuprolide11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Tissue Biomarkers Collected

Associations between baseline tissue biomarkers and PFS6 will be assessed using Fisher's exact test for categorical biomarkers, trend tests for ordinal biomarkers and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous biomarkers. For patients undergoing surgery, changes in tissue biomarkers from baseline to surgery will be summarized descriptively in an exploratory fashion. (NCT01642186)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A Everolimus9
Arm B Letrozole Plus Leuprolide9
Arm C Combination Everolimus, Letrozole and Leuprolide10

[back to top]

Invasive Disease-Free Survival (IDFS)

Time from date of registration to date of first invasive recurrence (local, regional or distant), second invasive primary cancer (breast or not), or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive who have not experienced recurrence or second primary cancer are censored at their last contact date. The results were presented as 5-year IDFS estimate. (NCT01674140)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years post registration

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo74.4
Everolimus74.9

[back to top]

Distant Recurrence-Free Survival (DRFS)

Time from date of registration to date of invasive distant disease recurrence, second invasive primary cancer (breast or not) or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive who have not experienced distant recurrence, or second primary cancer are censored at their last contact date. The results were presented as 5-year DRFS estimate. (NCT01674140)
Timeframe: 5 years after last accrual

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo75.7
Everolimus76.9

[back to top]

Toxicity Based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0, Assessed up to 10 Years.

Toxicity based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Only adverse events that are possibly, probably, or definitely related to study drug are reported. (NCT01674140)
Timeframe: Every 6 weeks while on protocol therapy. Adverse events (AEs) that occurred during follow up after protocol treatment were reported as late AEs, for every 6 months for the first 2 years and then yearly until 10 years after registration.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Abdominal painAlanine aminotransferase increasedAllergic reactionAnemiaAnxietyAppendicitisAppendicitis perforatedArthralgiaAscitesAspartate aminotransferase increasedBack painBone painBreast infectionCardiac arrestCholecystitisCholesterol highColitisCoughDehydrationDepressionDiarrheaDizzinessDyspneaEdema faceEdema limbsEye disorders - Other, specifyEye infectionFatigueFeverGallbladder infectionGallbladder perforationGastrointestinal disorders - Other, specifyGeneral disorders and admin site conditions - OtherGeneralized muscle weaknessHeadacheHeart failureHip fractureHot flashesHyperglycemiaHyperhidrosisHyperkalemiaHypertensionHypertriglyceridemiaHypokalemiaHyponatremiaHypophosphatemiaHypoxiaImmune system disorders - Other, specifyInfections and infestations - Other, specifyInfusion related reactionInsomniaInvestigations - Other, specifyIrregular menstruationJoint infectionKidney infectionLeft ventricular systolic dysfunctionLipase increasedLung infectionLymphedemaLymphocyte count decreasedMenorrhagiaMucositis oralMuscle weakness lower limbMuscle weakness upper limbMusculoskeletal and connective tiss disorder - OtherMyalgiaNasal congestionNauseaNeck painNervous system disorders - Other, specifyNeuralgiaNeutrophil count decreasedObesityOtitis mediaPainPain in extremityPapulopustular rashParoxysmal atrial tachycardiaPeriorbital edemaPeripheral sensory neuropathyPlatelet count decreasedPleural effusionPneumonitisPortal vein thrombosisPostoperative hemorrhageProductive coughPruritusPsychiatric disorders - Other, specifyPulmonary edemaRadiation recall reaction (dermatologic)Rash acneiformRash maculo-papularRash pustularRespiratory failureSepsisSeromaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders - OtherSkin infectionSkin ulcerationSoft tissue infectionSore throatSuicidal ideationSuicide attemptThromboembolic eventTooth infectionUpper respiratory infectionUrinary tract infectionVascular access complicationVomitingWeight gainWeight lossWhite blood cell decreasedWound complicationWound dehiscenceWound infection
Everolimus74210012516016019123213271111231112114410332115355212151311122061360601012121012201001022427111201214207138221115112110220546
Placebo1100120101101100100030200006000000100210064000004000100012051201000011031011010110100011000001000300000300101202010

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Time from date of registration to date of death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive are censored at their last contact date. The results were presented as 5-year OS estimate. (NCT01674140)
Timeframe: 5 years after last accrual

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo85.8
Everolimus88.1

[back to top]

Total Fat Mass

Total Fat mass as measured by DXA (NCT01712230)
Timeframe: Change over 6 months

Interventionkg (Mean)
Placebo0.73
GnRH Agonist1.66
GnRH Agonist + Exercise0.89

[back to top]

Total Fat Free Mass

Total Fat Free Mass as measured by DXA (NCT01712230)
Timeframe: Change over 6 months

Interventionkg (Mean)
Placebo0.1
GnRH Agonist-0.69
GnRH Agonist + Exercise-0.66

[back to top]

Change in Physical Activity Energy Expenditure (PAEE)

PAEE will be calculated as: TEE - REE - TEF, where TEE is total energy expenditure (measured by doubly-labeled water), REE is resting energy expenditure (measured by indirect calorimetry), and TEF is the thermic effect of feeding (estimated using a constant). (NCT01712230)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 6 months

Interventionkcal/day (Mean)
Placebo74.5
GnRH Agonist-10.2
GnRH Agonist + Exercise61.0

[back to top]

Change in C-telopeptides

Change in c-telopeptides following Round 1 of BAT (9 months) compared to the timepoint immediately following the ADT Lead-In (6 months) (NCT01750398)
Timeframe: 6 months and 9 months

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
ADT Plus IM Testosterone-159.77

[back to top]

Patients With PSA <4 ng/mL at the End of the Study

To determine the clinical effects of BAT in men with recurrent prostate cancer as first line therapy. This will be accomplished by assessing the number of patients achieving a PSA <4 ng/ml at the end of the trial. (NCT01750398)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ADT Plus IM Testosterone17

[back to top]

Change in Waist Circumference

(NCT01750398)
Timeframe: Bseline, 6 months and 9 months.

Interventioncm (Mean)
Following ADT lead inFollowing round 1 of BAT
ADT Plus IM Testosterone3.9-1.09

[back to top]

Change in Weight

Change in weight is measured from baseline to 6 months (i.e. following ADT lead in) and from 6 months to 9 months (i.e. from post-ADT to the end of cycle 1 of BAT). (NCT01750398)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months and 9 months.

Interventionkg (Mean)
Following ADT lead inFollowing round 1 of BAT
ADT Plus IM Testosterone2.081.21

[back to top]

Complete PSA Response

To evaluate the number of patients who achieve a complete PSA response (i.e. serum PSA <0.2 ng/ml) at the end of the study (NCT01750398)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients with PSA <0.2 ng/mlPatients with PSA ≥0.2 ng/ml
ADT Plus IM Testosterone326

[back to top]

Radiographic or Clinical Progression

To evaluate the number of men treated per the bipolar androgen therapy phase of the trial who developed radiographic or clinical progression. Radiographic progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Clinical progression was defined as new symptoms that can be attributed to progressive prostate cancer (e.g. new/worsening pain, urinary obstruction, cord compression, bone fractures). (NCT01750398)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients with radiographic/clinical progressionPatients without radiographic/clinical progression
ADT Plus IM Testosterone623

[back to top]

Quality of Life Survey

"To measure quality of life through the RAND-SF36 (short-form 36 questionnaire) Quality of Life Survey, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate Cancer (FACT-P), the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and a visual pain scale. Note that for all scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life/function, with the exception being the visual pain scale, where a higher score indicates more pain.~RAND-SF36: SF-36 is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures. Range is from 0 to 100.~FACT-P: A tool used for assessing the health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Range is from 0 to 156.~IIEF: Is a measure of erectile function. Range is from 5 to 25. IPSS: A tool used to measure symptoms related to prostatic disease. Range is from 0 to 35.~Visual pain scale: A tool used to track pain level. Range is from 0 to 10." (NCT01750398)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Change in SF-36 after round 1 of BATChange in FACT-P after round 1 of BATChange in IIEF after round 1 of BATChange in IPSS after round 1 of BAT
ADT Plus IM Testosterone3.23.5100

[back to top]

Change in Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) Dysphoria Score

"The IDAS Dysphoria Scale consists of 10 items and uses a 5-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 to 5 with 1 indicating not at all and 5 indicating extremely. As such, the range of possible scores is 10 to 50. The Dysphoria scale includes items assessing feelings of depression, inadequacy, psychomotor agitation, guilt, discouragement, anhedonia, poor concentration, difficulty with decision-making, psychomotor retardation, and worry. Higher scores indicate greater dysphoria." (NCT01762943)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and post-treatment

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
IDAS Dysphoria BaselineIDAS Dysphoria Withdrawal
Women With a History of Postpartum Depression (PPD)11.415.7
Women Without Any Psychiatric History (Control)12.711.1

[back to top]

Blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) Response During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) z Statistic

The primary outcome measure was functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data collected during a Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task. The BOLD response was examined within the nucleus accumbens, a brain region that responds to monetary rewards. The z statistic represents the maximum contrast between win versus non-win outcomes during the MID task in the nucleus accumbens, averaged across the participants in each group. The mean BOLD response ranged from z=1.7 to 2.3; higher z scores indicate greater activation of the nucleus accumbens during reward. Individual z scores were generated using the Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB) software library (FSL), which is a library of brain imaging analysis tools for fMRI. (NCT01762943)
Timeframe: baseline and hormone withdrawal

,
Interventionz score (Mean)
Left Nucleus Acc BaselineLeft Nucleus Acc WithdrawalRight Nucleus Acc BaselineRight Nucleus Acc Withdrawal
Women With a History of Postpartum Depression (PPD)2.32.12.22.3
Women Without Any Psychiatric History (Control)2.01.72.02.0

[back to top]

Oocytes

Number of oocytes retrieved (NCT01921166)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

Interventionoocytes (Number)
Clomiphene Plus Gonadotropins19
Leuprolide Flare47

[back to top]

Number of Oocytes Vitrified

(NCT01921166)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

Interventionoocytes (Number)
Clomiphene Plus Gonadotropins19
Leuprolide Flare47

[back to top]

Time to Testosterone Recovery

Percentage of patients with recovering testosterone to > 100 at 1, 2, and 3 years. (NCT02057939)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionpercentage (Number)
1 year2 year3 year
Enzalutamide94.6100100

[back to top]

Biochemical Progression-free Survival

Percentage of patients surviving 2 and 3 years from the start of study treatment without progression of disease. Biochemical PFS was defined as the time from the date of study treatment initiation to the date of first documented progression or death due to any cause. Progression-free was defined as being without one of the following: serum PSA value of 0.2 ng/mL or more above post-radiotherapy PSA nadir that continues to increase 4 weeks later OR if no nadir is experienced, two rising PSA values over 4 or more weeks (NCT02057939)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionpercentage (Number)
2 year bPFS3 year bPFS
Enzalutamide64.953.2

[back to top] [back to top]

PSA Nadir

Median PSA nadir post-radiation therapy (NCT02057939)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionng/ml (Median)
Enzalutamide0

[back to top]

Three Year Progression-free Survival

Percentage of patients surviving 3 years from the start of study treatment without progression of disease. PFS was defined as the time from the date of study treatment initiation to the date of first documented progression or death due to any cause. Progression-free was defined as being without one of the following: serum PSA value of 0.2 ng/mL or more above post-radiotherapy PSA nadir that continues to increase 4 weeks later OR if no nadir is experienced, two rising PSA values over 4 or more weeks OR evidence of clinical progression or initiation of systemic therapy for progressive disease (NCT02057939)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionpercentage (Number)
Enzalutamide53.2

[back to top]

Two Year Progression-free Survival

Percentage of patients surviving 2 years from the start of study treatment without progression of disease. PFS was defined as the time from the date of study treatment initiation to the date of first documented progression or death due to any cause. Progression-free was defined as being without one of the following: serum PSA value of 0.2 ng/mL or more above post-radiotherapy PSA nadir that continues to increase 4 weeks later OR if no nadir is experienced, two rising PSA values over 4 or more weeks OR evidence of clinical progression or initiation of systemic therapy for progressive disease (NCT02057939)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage (Number)
Enzalutamide64.9

[back to top]

PSA Less Than 0.1

The percentage of men with PSA less than 0.1 ng/mL and testosterone greater than 100 (NCT02057939)
Timeframe: every year, up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage (Number)
1 year2 year3 year
Enzalutamide75.748.632.4

[back to top]

The Number of Participants With a CTC Response

Will be summarized with point estimates (occurrence rates). A CTC response is defined as any level of CTC < 5 that is maintained or any level of CTC that is reduced from baseline. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Up to month 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)17
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)22

[back to top]

The Percentage of Patients Responding

Point estimates will be calculated and CI estimates will be derived from the Wilcoxon method using STATA software. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of response at 6 months (Number)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)86
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)79

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Bone Metastases Progression Free at Six Months

Percentage of patients with bone metastases Progression free at six months using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: assessed at six months

Interventionpercentage not progressed at 6 months (Number)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)91
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)33

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 2 Years

Overall Survival will be measured from date of registration to death or last follow up. OS will be estimated with standard K-M methodology. Point and CI estimates of the 2-year rate will derived from the K-M life table. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Assessed at 2 years

Interventionpercentage alive at 2 years (Number)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)82
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)54

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

Time to Treatment Failure from date of first treatment to date off treatment or date patient is taken off study for any reason. TTF will be estimated with standard K-M methodology. Point and CI estimates of the median and various time point-specific rates will be derived from the K-M life table. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 6 years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)8.2
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)20.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Progression-free at 6 Months

Will be estimated with standard K-M methodology. Point and CI estimates of the six-month rate will be derived from the K-M life table. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: From registration to PSA progression defined by PCWG II criteria or measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, assessed at 6 months

Interventionpercentage progression-free at 6 months (Number)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)92
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)45

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Progression Free at One Year

Percentage of patients progression free at one year using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: assessed at 1 year

Intervention% participants not progressed at 1 year (Number)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)84
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)34

[back to top]

Number of Participants With PSA Remission Assessed Using the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2) Criteria

Number of Participants with PSA Remission Assessed Using the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2) Criteria specifically at the 7 month time point. The binary endpoint (yes/no) will be summarized with its point estimate (an occurrence rate), and 2-sided Wilson type 95% confidence interval (CI). PSA response rates will be compared by treatment arm in a stratified logistic regression model. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Month 7

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)29
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)16

[back to top]

Achievement of PSA Response Assessed Using PCWG2 Criteria

Will be summarized with point estimates (occurrence rates), and 2-sided Wilson type 95% CIs. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)30
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)17

[back to top]

Achievement of Measurable Disease Response

The number of participants with Measurable disease response per RECIST v1.1. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)17
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)17

[back to top]

Frequency of Treatment Delay

Treatment delays will be reported to describe tolerability within each arm. (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No Treatment delay of BicalutamideTreatment Delay of BicalutamideNo Treatment Delay of PalbociclibTreatment Delay of Palbociclib
ADT + Ibrance®3552119
ADT Alone19100

[back to top]

Frequency of Dose Modification

Dose modifications will be reported to describe tolerability for arm 2 only (Ibrance®) (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No Dose Reduction (Palbociclib 125mg/day)1 Dose Reduction, to Palbociclib 100mg/day2 Dose Reductions, to Palbociclib 75mg/day
ADT + Ibrance®2857

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Achieve a PSA ≤ 4ng/mL After Seven Months of Protocol Treatment in Each Arm

The primary analysis will be assessment of the proportion of patients who achieve a (Prostate-specific antigen) PSA < 4ng/mL after seven months of protocol treatment in each arm. (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: 28 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ADT Alone16
ADT + Ibrance®32

[back to top]

Clinical Progression-free Survival Rate

12-month clinical progression-free survival rate will begin from treatment start until the event of biochemical (PSA) progression or death, whichever occurs first. Described by arm using Kaplan-Meier methods. (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12-month22-month (time of last event in Arm 1)32-month (time of last event in Arm 2)
ADT + Ibrance®83.877.758.5
ADT Alone77.764.864.8

[back to top]

Biochemical Progression-free Survival Rate

12-month biochemical progression-free survival rate will begin from treatment start until the event of biochemical (PSA) progression or death, whichever occurs first. Described by arm using Kaplan-Meier methods. (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12-month26-month (time of last event in Arm 1)43-month (time of last event in Arm 2)
ADT + Ibrance®76.559.433.9
ADT Alone74.745.845.8

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Who Achieve Undetectable PSA (<0.2ng/mL)

(NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ADT Alone13
ADT + Ibrance®22

[back to top] [back to top]

Duration of Therapy

Duration of therapy will be reported to describe tolerability within each arm. (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

Interventionmonths (Mean)
ADT Alone22.4
ADT + Ibrance®22.0

[back to top]

Safety, as Measured by the Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Event as Assess by NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) vs. 40 When Combining Enzalutamide With a GnRH and External Beam Radiation

Assessment will number of participants who experience adverse events greater than or equal to Grade 3, as defined by NCI Common terminology criteria for adverse events(CTCAE) v4.0 (NCT02064582)
Timeframe: 12 months following initiation of treatment with enzalutamide plus GnRH agonist

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Enzalutamide, Leuprolide, Radiation0

[back to top]

Fold Change in Intra-tumoral Androgen Regulated Gene Expression Pre and Post Combination Therapy

Fold change of Intra-tumoral Androgen Regulated Gene Expression (PSA, FKBP5, TMPRSS2, and NDRG1) will be measure at 12 months post therapy. (NCT02064582)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionFold change (Median)
Fold change in PSAFold change in FKBP5Fold change in TMPRSS2Fold change in NDRG1
Enzalutamide, Leuprolide, Radiation0.542.20.650.36

[back to top]

Serum Sex Hormone-binding Globulin (SHBG) Concentrations

Blood was collected and serum concentrations of SHBG were obtained using a validated laboratory test at a central laboratory facility. (NCT02083185)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Weeks 2, 5, 13, 25, 49, EOT (106.4 Weeks), Follow-up (110.4 Weeks) and End of Study (114.4 Weeks)

,
Interventionnanomoles per liter (nmol/L) (Mean)
Week 2, Day 1Week 5, Day 1Week 13, Day 1Week 25, Day 1Week 49, Day 1EOTFollow-UpEnd of Study
Relugolix 120 mg48.59449.18550.53850.77454.02254.10560.25051.063
Relugolix 80 mg50.81149.64149.21047.99850.60750.01345.43351.103

[back to top]

Time to Achieve Testosterone Concentrations < 50 ng/dL and < 20 ng/dL

(NCT02083185)
Timeframe: During Weeks 1 to 24

,,
Interventiondays (Median)
Time to Castration (< 50 ng/dL)Time to Profound Castration (< 20 ng/dL)
Leuprorelin 22.5 mg2929
Relugolix 120 mg415
Relugolix 80 mg415

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-P25 Score

EORTC QLQ-PR25 is an EORTC module designed to supplement the QLQ-C30 for any application in prostate cancer consisting of 25 questions distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Questions use are answered using a 4-point scale: 1=Not at all to 4 =Very much. All raw domain scores are linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores reflecting either more symptoms (urinary, bowel, hormonal treatment-related symptoms) or higher levels of activity or functioning (sexual). A positive change from Baseline in activity or functioning scales and negative change from Baseline in symptom scales indicates improvement. (NCT02083185)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1 of Weeks 5,13, 25, 37 and 49, EOT (106.4 Weeks), Follow-up (110.4 Weeks) and End of Study (114.4 Weeks)

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Sexual Activity: Week 5, Day 1Sexual Activity: Week 13, Day 1Sexual Activity: Week 25, Day 1Sexual Activity: Week 37, Day 1Sexual Activity: Week 49, Day 1Sexual Activity: EOTSexual Activity: Follow-upSexual Activity: End of StudySexual Functioning: Week 5, Day 1Sexual Functioning: Week 13, Day 1Sexual Functioning: Week 25, Day 1Sexual Functioning: Week 37, Day 1Sexual Functioning: Week 49, Day 1Sexual Functioning: EOTSexual Functioning: Follow-upSexual Functioning: End of StudyUrinary Symptoms: Week 5, Day 1Urinary Symptoms: Week 13, Day 1Urinary Symptoms: Week 25, Day 1Urinary Symptoms: Week 37, Day 1Urinary Symptoms: Week 49, Day 1Urinary Symptoms: EOTUrinary Symptoms: Follow-upUrinary Symptoms: End of studyBowel Symptoms: Week 5, Day 1Bowel Symptoms: Week 13, Day 1Bowel Symptoms: Week 25, Day 1Bowel Symptoms: Week 37, Day 1Bowel Symptoms: Week 49, Day 1Bowel Symptoms: EOTBowel Symptoms: Follow-upBowel Symptoms: End of StudyHTRS: Week 5, Day 1HTRS: Week 13, Day 1HTRS: Week 25, Day 1HTRS: Week 37, Day 1HTRS: Week 49, Day 1HTRS: EOTHTRS: Follow-upHTRS: End of StudyIncontinence Aid: Week 5, Day 1Incontinence Aid: Week 13, Day 1Incontinence Aid: Week 25, Day 1Incontinence Aid: Week 37, Day 1Incontinence Aid: Week 49, Day 1Incontinence Aid: EOTIncontinence Aid: Follow-upIncontinence Aid: End of Study
Leuprorelin 22.5 mg-7.6-11.1-18.8-14.3-17.5-30.8-14.3-21.9-4.20.8-16.7-19.86.037.52.1-13.94.26.87.212.99.99.09.86.80.32.41.13.22.42.62.41.03.57.210.913.215.917.915.912.5-16.7-16.7-16.7-16.7-22.2-16.7-33.3-33.3
Relugolix 120 mg-14.4-17.3-19.8-14.4-19.1-18.1-24.6-15.5-2.0-1.4-12.5-12.8-13.9-10.7-10.4-4.21.83.85.14.26.57.15.94.51.11.80.31.50.02.42.2-0.35.010.811.312.29.614.06.19.8-1.9-1.80.0-1.8-2.26.1-8.3-4.8
Relugolix 80 mg-6.0-9.3-9.4-12.0-13.0-15.7-9.2-7.9-9.9-8.3-4.7-10.7-16.7-16.73.1-11.52.01.93.63.44.03.3-1.02.21.91.03.13.83.02.10.02.15.69.211.713.314.412.97.510.80.00.03.58.37.06.10.00.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Effective Castration Rate Over 24 Weeks

Effective Castration rate is defined as the observed percentage of participants who have testosterone concentrations less than (<) 50 nanogram per deciliter (ng/dL) (1.73 nanomole per liter [nmol/L]) at all scheduled visits beginning after 4 weeks of treatment. (NCT02083185)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Week 5 to Day 1 of Week 25

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix 80 mg91
Relugolix 120 mg91
Leuprorelin 22.5 mg96

[back to top]

Prostate-Specific Antigen Nadir

PSA nadir is the lowest PSA achieved after treatment. (NCT02083185)
Timeframe: During Weeks 1 to 24

Interventionmicrograms per liter (µg/L) (Mean)
Relugolix 80 mg1.8
Relugolix 120 mg5.2
Leuprorelin 22.5 mg0.6

[back to top]

TAK-385 Plasma Concentrations

(NCT02083185)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 25, 37, 49 pre-dose; Day 4 of Week 1 pre-dose; Day 1 of Weeks 5, 13, 2 hrs post-dose

,
Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Week 1, Day 1 pre-doseWeek 1, Day 4 pre-doseWeek 2, Day 1 pre-doseWeek 3, Day 1 pre-doseWeek 5, Day 1 pre-doseWeek 5, Day 1, 2 hours post-doseWeek 9, Day 1 pre-doseWeek 13, Day 1 pre-doseWeek 13, Day 1, 2 hours post-doseWeek 17, Day 1 pre-doseWeek 25, Day 1 pre-doseWeek 37, Day 1 pre-doseWeek 49, Day 1 pre-dose
Relugolix 120 mg014.28.710.38.445.48.09.042.28.911.510.99.4
Relugolix 80 mg09.96.35.45.225.34.95.524.16.37.36.35.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30

The EORTC QLQ-C30 included 30 questions comprising 9 multi-item scales: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties) and a global health and QOL scale. Most questions used a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). All domain scores were calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem. A positive change from Baseline in quality og life or functioning scales and negative change from Baseline in symptom or difficulties scales indicates improvement. (NCT02083185)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Weeks 5, 13, 25, 37, 49, 73, 97, EOT (106.4 Weeks), Follow-up (110.4 Weeks) and End of Study (114.4 Weeks)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Quality of Life: Week 5, Day 1Quality of Life: Week 13, Day 1Quality of Life: Week 25, Day 1Quality of Life: Week 37, Day 1Quality of Life: Week 49, Day 1Quality of Life: EOTQuality of Life: Follow-UpQuality of Life: End of StudyPhysical Functioning: Week 5, Day 1Physical Functioning: Week 13, Day 1Physical Functioning: Week 25, Day 1Physical Functioning: Week 37, Day 1Physical Functioning: Week 49, Day 1Physical Functioning: EOTPhysical Functioning: Follow-UpPhysical Functioning: End of StudyRole Functioning: Week 5, Day 1Role Functioning: Week 13, Day 1Role Functioning: Week 25, Day 1Role Functioning: Week 37, Day 1Role Functioning: Week 49, Day 1Role Functioning: EOTRole Functioning: Follow-UpRole Functioning: End of StudyEmotional Functioning: Week 5, Day 1Emotional Functioning: Week 13, Day 1Emotional Functioning: Week 37, Day 1Emotional Functioning: Week 49, Day 1Emotional Functioning: EOTEmotional Functioning: Follow-UpEmotional Functioning: End of StudyCognitive Functioning: Week 5, Day 1Cognitive Functioning: Week 13, Day 1Cognitive Functioning: Week 25, Day 1Cognitive Functioning: Week 37, Day 1Cognitive Functioning: Week 49, Day 1Cognitive Functioning: EOTCognitive Functioning: Follow-UpCognitive Functioning: End of StudySocial Functioning: Week 5, Day 1Social Functioning: Week 13, Day 1Social Functioning: Week 25, Day 1Social Functioning: Week 37, Day 1Social Functioning: Week 49, Day 1Social Functioning: EOTSocial Functioning: Follow-UpSocial Functioning: End of StudyFatigue: Week 5, Day 1Fatigue: Week 13, Day 1Fatigue: Week 25, Day 1Fatigue: Week 37, Day 1Fatigue: Week 49, Day 1Fatigue: EOTFatigue: Follow-upFatigue: End of studyNausea and Vomiting: Week 5, Day 1Nausea and Vomiting: Week 13, Day 1Nausea and Vomiting: Week 25, Day 1Nausea and Vomiting: Week 37, Day 1Nausea and Vomiting: Week 49, Day 1Nausea and Vomiting: Week EOTNausea and Vomiting: Follow-UpNausea and Vomiting: End of StudyPain: Week 5, Day 1Pain: Week 13, Day 1Pain: Week 25, Day 1Pain: Week 37, Day 1Pain: Week 49, Day 1Pain: EOTPain: Follow-UpPain: End of StudyDyspnea: Week 5, Day 1Dyspnea: Week 13, Day 1Dyspnea: Week 25, Day 1Dyspnea: Week 37, Day 1Dyspnea: Week 49, Day 1Dyspnea: EOTDyspnea: Follow-UpDyspnea: End of StudyInsomnia: Week 5, Day 1Insomnia: Week 13, Day 1Insomnia: Week 25, Day 1Insomnia: Week 37, Day 1Insomnia: Week 49, Day 1Insomnia: EOTInsomnia: Follow-UpInsomnia: End of StudyAppetite Loss: Week 5, Day 1Appetite Loss: Week 13, Day 1Appetite Loss: Week 25, Day 1Appetite Loss: Week 37, Day 1Appetite Loss: Week 49, Day 1Appetite Loss: EOTAppetite Loss: Follow-UpAppetite Loss: End of StudyConstipation: Week 5, Day 1Constipation: Week 13, Day 1Constipation: Week 25, Day 1Constipation: Week 37, Day 1Constipation: Week 49, Day 1Constipation: EOTConstipation: Follow-UpConstipation: End Of StudyDiarrhea: Week 5, Day 1Diarrhea: Week 13, Day 1Diarrhea: Week 25, Day 1Diarrhea: Week 37, Day 1Diarrhea: Week 49, Day 1Diarrhea: EOTDiarrhea: Follow-UpDiarrhea: End Of StudyFinancial Difficulties:Week 5, Day 1Financial Difficulties:Week 13, Day 1Financial Difficulties:Week 25, Day 1Financial Difficulties:Week 37, Day 1Financial Difficulties:Week 49, Day 1Financial Difficulties: EOTFinancial Difficulties: Follow-UpFinancial Difficulties: End of Study
Leuprorelin 22.5 mg-5.2-7.3-6.9-11.7-8.3-13.5-13.7-10.9-0.8-0.3-2.0-4.2-7.0-2.6-3.8-2.92.81.4-2.2-4.5-7.1-5.1-7.1-1.01.7-1.4-9.8-4.4-14.1-8.9-8.3-2.8-5.6-2.9-9.8-11.9-12.8-10.7-3.14.2-0.7-202-7.6-8.7-6.4-4.80.03.28.313.516.720.120.513.58.33.51.42.94.54.87.70.00.03.54.22.911.47.96.41.2-2.15.68.38.722.717.520.514.38.31.46.98.718.26.37.74.810.42.80.02.90.04.82.6-2.40.01.45.61.41.51.60.00.00.01.40.02.96.11.65.14.82.1-1.42.84.37.63.22.611.90.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30

The EORTC QLQ-C30 included 30 questions comprising 9 multi-item scales: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties) and a global health and QOL scale. Most questions used a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). All domain scores were calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem. A positive change from Baseline in quality og life or functioning scales and negative change from Baseline in symptom or difficulties scales indicates improvement. (NCT02083185)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Weeks 5, 13, 25, 37, 49, 73, 97, EOT (106.4 Weeks), Follow-up (110.4 Weeks) and End of Study (114.4 Weeks)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Quality of Life: Week 5, Day 1Quality of Life: Week 13, Day 1Quality of Life: Week 25, Day 1Quality of Life: Week 37, Day 1Quality of Life: Week 49, Day 1Quality of Life: Week 73, Day 1Quality of Life: Week 97, Day 1Quality of Life: EOTQuality of Life: Follow-UpQuality of Life: End of StudyPhysical Functioning: Week 5, Day 1Physical Functioning: Week 13, Day 1Physical Functioning: Week 25, Day 1Physical Functioning: Week 37, Day 1Physical Functioning: Week 49, Day 1Physical Functioning: Week 73, Day 1Physical Functioning: Week 97, Day 1Physical Functioning: EOTPhysical Functioning: Follow-UpPhysical Functioning: End of StudyRole Functioning: Week 5, Day 1Role Functioning: Week 13, Day 1Role Functioning: Week 25, Day 1Role Functioning: Week 37, Day 1Role Functioning: Week 49, Day 1Role Functioning: Week 73, Day 1Role Functioning: Week 97, Day 1Role Functioning: EOTRole Functioning: Follow-UpRole Functioning: End of StudyEmotional Functioning: Week 5, Day 1Emotional Functioning: Week 13, Day 1Emotional Functioning: Week 37, Day 1Emotional Functioning: Week 49, Day 1Emotional Functioning: Week 73, Day 1Emotional Functioning: Week 97, Day 1Emotional Functioning: EOTEmotional Functioning: Follow-UpEmotional Functioning: End of StudyCognitive Functioning: Week 5, Day 1Cognitive Functioning: Week 13, Day 1Cognitive Functioning: Week 25, Day 1Cognitive Functioning: Week 37, Day 1Cognitive Functioning: Week 49, Day 1Cognitive Functioning: Week 73, Day 1Cognitive Functioning: Week 97, Day 1Cognitive Functioning: EOTCognitive Functioning: Follow-UpCognitive Functioning: End of StudySocial Functioning: Week 5, Day 1Social Functioning: Week 13, Day 1Social Functioning: Week 25, Day 1Social Functioning: Week 37, Day 1Social Functioning: Week 49, Day 1Social Functioning: Week 73, Day 1Social Functioning: Week 97, Day 1Social Functioning: EOTSocial Functioning: Follow-UpSocial Functioning: End of StudyFatigue: Week 5, Day 1Fatigue: Week 13, Day 1Fatigue: Week 25, Day 1Fatigue: Week 37, Day 1Fatigue: Week 49, Day 1Fatigue: Week 73, Day 1Fatigue: Week 97, Day 1Fatigue: EOTFatigue: Follow-upFatigue: End of studyNausea and Vomiting: Week 5, Day 1Nausea and Vomiting: Week 13, Day 1Nausea and Vomiting: Week 25, Day 1Nausea and Vomiting: Week 37, Day 1Nausea and Vomiting: Week 49, Day 1Nausea and Vomiting: Week 73, Day 1Nausea and Vomiting: Week 97, Day 1Nausea and Vomiting: Week EOTNausea and Vomiting: Follow-UpNausea and Vomiting: End of StudyPain: Week 5, Day 1Pain: Week 13, Day 1Pain: Week 25, Day 1Pain: Week 37, Day 1Pain: Week 49, Day 1Pain: Week 73, Day 1Pain: Week 97, Day 1Pain: EOTPain: Follow-UpPain: End of StudyDyspnea: Week 5, Day 1Dyspnea: Week 13, Day 1Dyspnea: Week 25, Day 1Dyspnea: Week 37, Day 1Dyspnea: Week 49, Day 1Dyspnea: Week 73, Day 1Dyspnea: Week 97, Day 1Dyspnea: EOTDyspnea: Follow-UpDyspnea: End of StudyInsomnia: Week 5, Day 1Insomnia: Week 13, Day 1Insomnia: Week 25, Day 1Insomnia: Week 37, Day 1Insomnia: Week 49, Day 1Insomnia: Week 73, Day 1Insomnia: Week 97, Day 1Insomnia: EOTInsomnia: Follow-UpInsomnia: End of StudyAppetite Loss: Week 5, Day 1Appetite Loss: Week 13, Day 1Appetite Loss: Week 25, Day 1Appetite Loss: Week 37, Day 1Appetite Loss: Week 49, Day 1Appetite Loss: Week 73, Day 1Appetite Loss: Week 97, Day 1Appetite Loss: EOTAppetite Loss: Follow-UpAppetite Loss: End of StudyConstipation: Week 5, Day 1Constipation: Week 13, Day 1Constipation: Week 25, Day 1Constipation: Week 37, Day 1Constipation: Week 49, Day 1Constipation: Week 73, Day 1Constipation: Week 97, Day 1Constipation: EOTConstipation: Follow-UpConstipation: End Of StudyDiarrhea: Week 5, Day 1Diarrhea: Week 13, Day 1Diarrhea: Week 25, Day 1Diarrhea: Week 37, Day 1Diarrhea: Week 49, Day 1Diarrhea: Week 73, Day 1Diarrhea: Week 97, Day 1Diarrhea: EOTDiarrhea: Follow-UpDiarrhea: End Of StudyFinancial Difficulties:Week 5, Day 1Financial Difficulties:Week 13, Day 1Financial Difficulties:Week 25, Day 1Financial Difficulties:Week 37, Day 1Financial Difficulties:Week 49, Day 1Financial Difficulties:Week 73, Day 1Financial Difficulties: Week 97, Day 1Financial Difficulties: EOTFinancial Difficulties: Follow-UpFinancial Difficulties: End of Study
Relugolix 120 mg-4.0-2.0-2.3-7.4-7.3-12.0-2.2-7.1-8.8-10.1-0.9-4.4-5.3-6.2-5.2-8.5-6.0-9.3-6.3-9.0-0.3-3.6-6.3-10.0-8.9-6.7-4.4-8.6-10.5-13.20.3-1.1-1.7-1.4-2.32.6-7.4-1.3-0.6-4.2-7.5-3.8-5.6-6.1-7.3-7.0-10.0-7.0-7.5-1.3-3.3-6.3-5.9-9.8-6.0-4.4-10.0-8.8-9.24.38.913.214.111.114.79.915.96.412.30.60.70.01.10.80.71.81.90.9-1.10.63.32.85.96.57.30.06.710.56.92.66.58.311.19.89.38.814.38.814.93.29.812.58.17.310.710.57.60.05.70.6-0.70.02.20.85.33.58.63.53.41.95.26.38.17.31.33.51.910.55.71.92.05.60.7-1.61.30.02.90.0-1.12.6-0.70.71.50.82.71.85.71.83.4
Relugolix 80 mg-2.7-2.3-6.4-6.0-7.2-3.4-6.6-4.8-5.4-7.90.90.3-2.8-4.8-4.3-5.1-8.1-3.4-4.0-8.90.3-1.0-4.9-10.9-8.1-8.0-8.8-9.5-10.0-10.61.9-0.7-4.3-3.0-2.0-2.6-3.6-3.3-5.3-0.9-1.0-0.7-5.8-2.6-5.7-6.1-2.9-0.8-2.30.31.6-1.0-2.5-3.7-2.9-5.3-5.2-3.3-3.71.96.16.39.710.910.05.812.17.211.4-1.30.70.00.4-1.90.05.3-0.53.31.4-1.6-1.00.32.93.36.95.3-0.59.26.5-0.65.94.26.56.78.010.57.611.711.1-1.32.66.32.26.72.310.56.75.01.9-3.8-0.7-3.5-0.7-0.7-2.30.0-3.80.0-1.90.63.92.85.82.21.11.83.85.03.7-1.93.92.83.63.04.67.04.83.31.9-1.3-2.0-3.5-2.9-5.20.05.3-3.85.0-2.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. A SAE is any AE that results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event. (NCT02083185)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug to 30 days after last dose of study drug up to 106.7 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any Adverse EventSAEs
Leuprorelin 22.5 mg232
Relugolix 120 mg537
Relugolix 80 mg5310

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline of Aging Male Survey (AMS) Total Score

AMS scale is a self-administered questionnaire used to: 1) assess symptoms of aging (independent from those that are disease related) between groups of males under different conditions; 2) evaluate the severity of symptoms over time; and 3) measure changes before and after androgen therapy. Each question was answered between 1=none to 5=extremely severe for 17 items from psychological (5 items), somatic (7 items), and sexual (5 items) categories. Total score is sum of all the item scores and range from 17 (minimum) to 85 (maximum), where high score indicated high level of symptoms. (NCT02083185)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1 of Weeks 5,13, 25, 37 and 49, EOT (106.4 Weeks), Follow-up (110.4 Weeks) and End of Study (114.4 Weeks)

,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Week 5, Day 1Week 13, Day 1Week 25, Day 1Week 37, Day 1Week 49, Day 1EOTFollow-UpEnd of Study
Leuprorelin 22.5 mg10.08321.88746.99549.42259.97160.95253.83449.879
Relugolix 120 mg10.87217.25920.35324.46624.37728.64413.03121.304
Relugolix 80 mg3.91414.78120.27224.13630.12218.85715.75416.270

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response of ≥ 50% and ≥ 90% Reduction at 4 Weeks

PSA Response is defined as a reduction in PSA from Baseline and is reported for 2 categories: ≥ 50% reduction and ≥ 90% reduction. (NCT02083185)
Timeframe: Week 5, Day 1

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
≥ 50% PSA reduction≥ 90% PSA reduction
Leuprorelin 22.5 mg170
Relugolix 120 mg836
Relugolix 80 mg7513

[back to top]

Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Concentrations

Blood was collected and serum concentrations of LH in milli international units per milliliters (mIU/mL) were obtained using a validated laboratory test at a central laboratory facility. (NCT02083185)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 4 of Week 1, Day 1 of Weeks 2, 3, 5,13, 25 and 49, End of Treatment (EOT - 106.4 Weeks), Follow-up (110.4 Weeks) and End of Study (114.4 Weeks)

,,
InterventionmIU/mL (Mean)
Week 1, Day 4Week 2, Day 1Week 3, Day 1Week 5, Day 1Week 13, Day 1Week 25, Day 1Week 49, Day 1EOTFollow-UpEnd of Study
Leuprorelin 22.5 mg17.5518.2793.1710.5080.2770.1340.1380.5850.5251.394
Relugolix 120 mg0.5950.6380.3880.2030.1830.1750.2882.7049.5109.306
Relugolix 80 mg0.6650.5480.3410.4240.2290.1950.3413.1898.6247.182

[back to top]

Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Concentration at the End of Weeks 12 and 24

Blood was collected and serum concentrations of PSA were obtained using a validated laboratory test at a central laboratory facility. (NCT02083185)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Weeks 13 and 25

,,
Interventionμg/L (Mean)
Week 13, Day 1Week 25, Day 1
Leuprorelin 22.5 mg0.9160.624
Relugolix 120 mg5.7862.360
Relugolix 80 mg2.6511.936

[back to top]

Serum Sex Hormone-binding Globulin (SHBG) Concentrations

Blood was collected and serum concentrations of SHBG were obtained using a validated laboratory test at a central laboratory facility. (NCT02083185)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Weeks 2, 5, 13, 25, 49, EOT (106.4 Weeks), Follow-up (110.4 Weeks) and End of Study (114.4 Weeks)

Interventionnanomoles per liter (nmol/L) (Mean)
Week 2, Day 1Week 5, Day 1Week 13, Day 1Week 25, Day 1Week 49, Day 1EOTEnd of Study
Leuprorelin 22.5 mg39.02943.78641.85840.83938.23723.00039.014

[back to top]

Serum Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Concentrations

Blood was collected and serum concentrations of FSH were obtained using a validated laboratory test at a central laboratory facility. (NCT02083185)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Weeks 2, 5, 13, 25, 49, EOT (106.4 Weeks), Follow-up (110.4 Weeks) and End of Study (114.4 Weeks)

,,
InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Week 2, Day 1Week 5, Day 1Week 13, Day 1Week 25, Day 1Week 49, Day 1EOTFollow-UpEnd of Study
Leuprorelin 22.5 mg7.6502.9464.6255.0435.1455.2509.2005.943
Relugolix 120 mg3.1831.0350.9081.3441.9385.69114.61015.768
Relugolix 80 mg3.1121.2481.1371.0901.8025.37716.16011.441

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Negative Biopsies at Month 12

Staging biopsy of at least 12 cores were sampled and analyzed according to a centralized biopsy procedure which confirm the results of the first biopsy [presence of positive cores, the absence of core with tumor length > 3 millimeters (mm), and absence Grade 4 cells (Gleason score < 7)]. The Gleason score grades prostate cancer tissue, based on its appearance under a microscope. Scores range from 2 to 10, with a higher score meaning that the cancer tissue is more likely to spread. (NCT02085252)
Timeframe: Month 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Leuprorelin 11.25 mg28
Active Surveillance17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score

The HADS is a 14-item scale that measures anxiety (7-items) and depression (7-items) over the previous week. Each question is answered on a scale of 0 (best) to 3 (worst) for a total possible score of 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating more anxiety and depression. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model fitted with baseline HADS score and age as covariates was used for analyses. (NCT02085252)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Month 3Change at Month 6Change at Month 9Change at Month 12
Active Surveillance-1.20-1.58-1.76-1.95
Leuprorelin 11.25 mg-0.83-1.44-2.06-1.87

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Gleason Score ≥ 7

Gleason score grades prostate cancer tissue, based on its appearance under a microscope. Scores range from 2 to 10, with a higher score meaning that the cancer tissue is more likely to spread. (NCT02085252)
Timeframe: Month 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Leuprorelin 11.25 mg1
Active Surveillance3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Questionnaire Score

The IIEF-5, a 5 question patient completed questionnaire, is a measure of erectile dysfunction over the past 6 months. Each question is answered on a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best). Total score ranges from 5 to 25 with higher scores indicating better function (5-7: severe; 8-11: moderate; 12-16: mild to moderate;17-21: mild; 22-25: none). A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. A negative change from baseline indicates a worsening. An ANCOVA model fitted with baseline IIEF-5 score and age as covariates was used for analyses. (NCT02085252)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Month 3Change at Month 6Change at Month 9Change at Month 12
Active Surveillance0.000.01-0.38-0.02
Leuprorelin 11.25 mg-7.40-5.87-1.94-1.68

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) Total Symptom (S) Score

The I-PSS is an 8-question tool used to measure prostate symptoms (≤7: mildly symptomatic; 8-19 moderately symptomatic; 20-35 severely symptomatic). The first 7 symptom questions answered on a scale of 0 (never) to 5 (almost always) are used to determine the I-PSS Total S Score for a total possible score of 0 to 35. The 8th question is quality of life and is not reported here. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model fitted with baseline I-PSS total score and age as covariates was used for analysis. (NCT02085252)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Month 3Change at Month 6Change at Month 9Change at Month 12
Active Surveillance1.030.320.640.93
Leuprorelin 11.25 mg0.37-0.38-1.13-0.48

[back to top]

Highest Diameter of the Lesion as a Measure of Tumor Radiologic Progression Using Dynamic MRI

MRI is an imaging technique used to investigate the anatomy and function of the body. Measurements were taken to determine the diameter of the lesions in millimeters (mm). (NCT02085252)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
BaselineMonth 12
Active Surveillance7.787.69
Leuprorelin 11.25 mg6.396.25

[back to top]

Prostatic Volume as a Measure of Tumor Radiologic Progression Using Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

MRI is an imaging technique used to investigate the anatomy and function of the body. Measurements were taken to calculate the prostatic volume in cubic millimeters (mm^3). (NCT02085252)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

,
Interventionmm^3 (Mean)
BaselineMonth 12
Active Surveillance49.4448.33
Leuprorelin 11.25 mg48.4851.47

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Levels

Blood was collected and sent to a central laboratory for analysis of PSA reported in milligrams/milliliter (mg/mL). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model fitted with baseline PSA Level and age as covariates was used for analyses. (NCT02085252)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

,
Interventionmg/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Month 3Change at Month 6Change at Month 9Change at Month 12
Active Surveillance0.220.850.710.76
Leuprorelin 11.25 mg-4.61-3.27-1.460.17

[back to top]

Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Digits Span Forward and Backward, 6 Months

Change in score on the Digit Span Test between baseline and 6 month. Raw scores on the Digit Span test range from 0-16 (Digits Forward) and 0-10 (Digits Backward) with higher scores indicating better performance. A positive change score indicates improved performance. (NCT02122198)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months

,
Interventionnumber of correct trials (Mean)
Digits Forward (trials correct)Digits Backward (trials correct)
GnRH Agonist-0.880.00
Placebo1.00-0.67

[back to top]

Changes in Prefrontal Cortex Brain Activation at 9 Months

Changes in patterns of brain activation in the prefrontal cortex using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a task of working memory will be measured at baseline, 6 months, and 9 months (GnRH agonist arm only). Beta weight is the percent signal change on the FMRI from one condition to another. The FMRI is measuring blood oxygen levels and blood flow in different regions of the brain and using that to determine activity changes in the brain. A positive number/increase indicates more blood flow and brain activity in that area. (NCT02122198)
Timeframe: Baseline, 9 months

Interventionbeta-weight (Mean)
Frontal Pole (L)Frontal Orbital Cortex (L)Superior Frontal Gyrus (R)
GnRH Agonist-27.15-88.87-77.23

[back to top]

Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: RAVLT, 9 Months

"Change in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test from baseline to 9 months.~Score is the change in the number of items correct on delayed recall trial. Scores on the RAVLT range from 0-15 with higher scores indicating better performance. A positive change indicates improvement in recall." (NCT02122198)
Timeframe: Baseline, 9 months

Interventionnumber of items recalled (Mean)
GnRH Agonist0

[back to top]

Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: RAVLT, 6 Months

"Change in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test from baseline to 6 months.~Score is the change in the number of items correct on delayed recall trial. Scores on the RAVLT range from 0-15 with higher scores indicating better performance. A positive change indicates improvement in recall." (NCT02122198)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months

Interventionnumber of items recalled (Mean)
Placebo-1.00
GnRH Agonist-1.38

[back to top]

Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Controlled Oral Word Association Test, 9 Months

Change in sum of scores on 3 COWAT trials (letters, F, A, and S) between baseline and 9 months. Participants are given one minute to think up as many words as they can associated with each letter (F, A, or S). Raw scores are the total number of words generated across all trials. Higher scores indicate more words generated and better performance. Positive change score indicates an increase in words generated, or improved performance. (NCT02122198)
Timeframe: Baseline, 9 months

Interventionwords generated (Mean)
GnRH Agonist7.33

[back to top]

Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Controlled Oral Word Association Test, 6 Months

Change in sum of scores on 3 COWAT trials (letters, F, A, and S) between baseline and 6 months. Participants are given one minute to think up as many words as they can associated with each letter (F, A, or S). Raw scores are the total number of words generated across all trials. Higher scores indicate more words generated and better performance. Positive change score indicates an increase in words generated, or improved performance. (NCT02122198)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months

Interventionwords generated (Mean)
Placebo-5.33
GnRH Agonist0.25

[back to top]

Changes in Artery Compliance at 9 Months

Changes in carotid artery compliance will be measured using ultrasound in at baseline, 9 months. (NCT02122198)
Timeframe: Baseline, 9 months

Interventionmm^2/mmhgx10^-1 (Mean)
GnRH Agonist-0.002

[back to top]

Changes in Artery Compliance at 6 Months

Changes in carotid artery compliance will be measured using ultrasound in at baseline, 6 months. (NCT02122198)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months

Interventionmm^2/mmhgx10^-1 (Mean)
Placebo-0.048
GnRH Agonist-0.095

[back to top]

Changes in Prefrontal Cortex Brain Activation at 6 Months

Changes in patterns of brain activation in the prefrontal cortex using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a task of working memory will be measured at baseline, 6 months, and 9 months (GnRH agonist arm only). Beta weight is the percent signal change on the FMRI from one condition to another. The FMRI is measuring blood oxygen levels and blood flow in different regions of the brain and using that to determine activity changes in the brain. A positive number/increase indicates more blood flow and brain activity in that area. (NCT02122198)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months

,
Interventionbeta-weight (Mean)
Frontal Pole (L)Frontal Orbital Cortex (L)Superior Frontal Gyrus (R)
GnRH Agonist-62.20-79.04-53.05
Placebo90.6428.0792.45

[back to top]

Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Stroop, 6 Months

Change in number of correct responses in one minute on Stroop Color Word Interference test between baseline and 6 months. A positive number indicates more items correct indicating better performance. There is no maximum score because the test measures how many correct responses a participant can return within one minute (minimum = 0), however 40 or fewer is considered low. The change in the number of correct responses is reported, and so a positive number indicates more correct responses and better/improved cognitive function. (NCT02122198)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months

Interventionnumber correct in one minute (Mean)
Placebo-0.67
GnRH Agonist0.25

[back to top]

Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Stroop, 9 Months

Change in number of correct responses in one minute on Stroop Color Word Interference test between baseline and 9 months. Positive number indicates more items correct indicating better performance. There is no maximum score because the test measures how many correct responses a participant can return within one minute (minimum = 0), however 40 or fewer is considered low. The change in the number of correct responses is reported, and so a positive number indicates more correct responses and better/improved cognitive function. (NCT02122198)
Timeframe: Baseline, 9 months

Interventionnumber correct in one minute (Mean)
GnRH Agonist7.33

[back to top]

Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Trails A, 6 Months

Change in time (seconds) to complete Trails A test between baseline and 6 months. Negative value indicates faster time (better performance) at 6 months compared to baseline. (NCT02122198)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Placebo2.79
GnRH Agonist-5.82

[back to top]

Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Trails A, 9 Months

Change in time (seconds) to complete Trails A test between baseline and 9 months. Negative value indicates faster time (better performance) at 9 months compared to baseline. (NCT02122198)
Timeframe: Baseline, 9 months

Interventiontime (seconds) (Mean)
GnRH Agonist-5.46

[back to top]

Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Trails B, 6 Months

Change in time (seconds) to complete Trails B test between baseline and 6 months. Negative value indicates faster time (better performance) at 6 months compared to baseline. (NCT02122198)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months

Interventiontime (seconds) (Mean)
Placebo14.23
GnRH Agonist-4.32

[back to top]

Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Digits, 9 Months

Change in score on the Digit Span Test between baseline and 9 months. Raw scores on the Digit Span test range from 0-16 (Digits Forward) and 0-10 (Digits Backward) with higher scores indicating better performance. A positive change score indicates improved performance. (NCT02122198)
Timeframe: Baseline, 9 months

Interventionnumber of trials correct (Mean)
Digits Forward (trials correct)Digits Backward (trials correct)
GnRH Agonist1.001.0

[back to top]

Changes in Executive Cognitive Function: Trails B, 9 Months

Change in time (seconds) to complete Trails B test between baseline and 9 months. Negative value indicates faster time (better performance) at 9 months compared to baseline. (NCT02122198)
Timeframe: Baseline, 9 months

Interventiontime (seconds) (Mean)
GnRH Agonist14.14

[back to top]

Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients Treated With Anticancer Drugs (QOL-ACD) Total and Subscale Score at Baseline

QOL-ACD score is a score used for cancer participants treated with anti-cancer drug and is a 22-item self-reported instrument assessing differences in symptom severity and health-related QOL. It includes 4 subscale domains: Daily Activities, Physical Condition, Social Activities, Mental and Psychological Status. Total and subscale scores are calculated as sum of items within each subscale: Daily Activity (items 1-6), Physical Condition (7-11), Psychological Condition (12-16), Social Attitude (17-21) and total (1-22). Face scale: 5-point score for 1 item (22). Participants answer each question on a 5-point scale (1: not at all [worst response] to 5: very much [best response]). Score range for total score is 22 to 110 and subscale score range for daily activity is 6 to 30, and for physical condition, psychological condition, and social attitude is 5 to 25. Less total/subscale scores reflect greater symptom severity and symptom impact on health-related QOL. (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Total score (n=2174)Daily activity (n=2178)Physical condition (n=2178)Psychological condition (n=2178)Social relationships (n=2177)
Leuprorelin Acetate88.928.021.919.116.0

[back to top]

Score of QOL-ACD-B at Week 12

QOL-ACD-B is a part of QOL-ACD (using questionnaire items 1 to 18). QOL-ACD is a score used for cancer participants treated with anti-cancer drug and is a 22-item self-reported instrument assessing differences in symptom severity and health-related QOL. Participants answer each question on a 5-point scale (1: not at all [worst response] to 5: very much [best response]). Total score for QOL-ACD-B is calculated as a sum of 18 items, score range: 18 to 90 where less scores reflect greater symptom severity and symptom impact on health-related quality of life. Means and standard deviations were calculated for the total score and score of each subscale from questionnaire items 1 to 18. (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Total score: (n=2025)Physical condition and pain: (n=2031)Health-care and illness satisfaction: (n=2029)
Leuprorelin Acetate71.073.185.2

[back to top]

Score of QOL-ACD-B at Week 48

QOL-ACD-B is a part of QOL-ACD (using questionnaire items 1 to 18). QOL-ACD is a score used for cancer participants treated with anti-cancer drug and is a 22-item self-reported instrument assessing differences in symptom severity and health-related QOL. Participants answer each question on a 5-point scale (1: not at all [worst response] to 5: very much [best response]). Total score for QOL-ACD-B is calculated as a sum of 18 items, score range: 18 to 90 where less scores reflect greater symptom severity and symptom impact on health-related quality of life. Means and standard deviations were calculated for the total score and score of each subscale from questionnaire items 1 to 18. (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Total score (n=1651)Physical condition and pain (n=1659)Healthcare and illness satisfaction (n=1656)
Leuprorelin Acetate71.974.884.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Felt Relief From Physical and Emotional Burden

"The question was with regard to the assessment of convenience associated with the changes in agents, The change in agents reduced the frequency of injections by one third; for this reason, did you feel relief from physical and emotional burden? and the answers were categorized as felt extreme relief, felt slight relief, no feeling either way, felt little relief, felt no relief." (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Felt extreme reliefFelt slight reliefNo feeling either wayFelt little reliefFelt no reliefNot determined
Leuprorelin Acetate34.831.617.87.14.83.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Worried About the Effect of the Medicinal Agent

"The question was with regard to the assessment of convenience associated with the changes in agents, The change in agents reduced the frequency of injections by one third; for this reason, did you worry about the effect? and the options of the answers were not at all worried, not too worried, no thought either way, somewhat worried, and very worried." (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Not at all worriedNot too worriedNo thought either waySomewhat worriedVery worriedNot determined
Leuprorelin Acetate29.733.822.49.80.83.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Change in Adverse Drug Reactions Due to the Change in Medicinal Agents

"The question was with regard to the assessment of convenience associated with the changes in agents, Was there a change in adverse drug reactions (e.g., menopausal-like symptoms such as hot flushes, injection-site abnormalities) due to the change in agents? and the options of the answers were events became much less severe, events became less severe, whether or not the events became severe cannot be determined, events became slightly more severe, and events became very severe." (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Events became much less severeEvents became less severeCannot be determinedEvents became slightly more severeEvents became very severeNot determined
Leuprorelin Acetate1.45.568.517.03.93.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Change in Pain at the Time of Injection Due to the Change in Medicinal Agents

"The question was with regard to the assessment of convenience associated with the changes in agents, Was there a change in pain at the time of injection due to the change in agents? and the options of the answers were significantly relieved, slightly relieved, whether or not the pain worsened or was relieved cannot be determined, worsened slightly, and worsened significantly." (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Significantly relievedSlightly relievedCannot be determinedWorsened slightlyWorsened significantlyNot determined
Leuprorelin Acetate4.710.464.914.42.13.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Positive Change in Agents

"The question was with regard to the assessment of convenience associated with the changes in agents, Was the change in agents good? and the options of the answers were very good, somewhat good, whether or not the change in agents was good cannot be determined, somewhat bad, very bad." (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Very goodSomewhat goodCannot be determinedSomewhat badVery badNot determined
Leuprorelin Acetate32.036.526.01.30.53.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Reduction in Frequency of Medical Visits Due to Change in Medicinal Agents

"The question was with regard to the assessment of convenience associated with the changes in agents, Did the change in agents reduce the frequency of your medical visits? and the answers were categorized as very much reduced, somewhat reduced, unchanged. Change in medicinal agents means participants with a historical diagnosis of premenopausal breast cancer who switched to leuprorelin acetate sustained-release 11.25 mg injection kit from a 4-week adjuvant therapy with a LH-RHa 1 month depot preparation as part of daily medical practice." (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Very much reducedSomewhat reducedUnchangedNot determined
Leuprorelin Acetate67.710.116.95.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Relief From Financial Burden Due to the Change in Medicinal Agents

"The question was with regard to the assessment of convenience associated with the changes in agents, Did you feel relief from financial burden (example, 3 months' drug costs and transportation fee) due to the change in agents? and the answers were categorized as felt extreme relief, felt slight relief, no feeling either way, felt little relief, felt no relief. The sum of all the categories is not 100% because of rounding error." (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Felt extreme reliefFelt slight reliefNo feeling either wayFelt little reliefFelt no reliefNot determined
Leuprorelin Acetate22.241.021.29.52.43.6

[back to top]

QOL-ACD Breast (QOL-ACD-B) Score at Baseline

QOL-ACD-B is a part of QOL-ACD (using questionnaire items 1 to 18). QOL-ACD is a score used for cancer participants treated with anti-cancer drug and is a 22-item self-reported instrument assessing differences in symptom severity and health-related QOL. Participants answer each question on a 5-point scale (1: not at all [worst response] to 5: very much [best response]). Total score was calculated over score range 0-100 for item 1 to 18 as ((a sum of 18 items)/18-1)*25). Score for physical condition and pain was calculated over score range 0-100 for item 1 to 6 as ((a sum of 6 items)/6-1)*25)). Score for health-care and illness satisfaction was calculated over score range 0-100 for item 7 to 10 as ((a sum of 4 items)/4-1)*25)), where less scores reflect greater symptom severity and symptom impact on health-related quality of life. Means and standard deviations were calculated for the total score and score of each subscale from questionnaire items 1 to 18. (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Total score (n=2172)Physical condition and pain (n=2175)Health-care and illness satisfaction (n=2176)
Leuprorelin Acetate70.472.385.1

[back to top]

QOL-ACD Total and Subscale Score at Week 12

QOL-ACD score is a score used for cancer participants treated with anti-cancer drug and is a 22-item self-reported instrument assessing differences in symptom severity and health-related QOL. It includes 4 subscale domains: Daily Activities, Physical Condition, Social Activities, Mental and Psychological Status. Total and subscale scores are calculated as sum of items within each subscale: Daily Activity (items 1-6), Physical Condition (7-11), Psychological Condition (12-16), Social Attitude (17-21) and total (1-22). Face scale:5-point score for 1 item (22). Participants answer each question on a 5-point scale (1: not at all [worst response] to 5: very much [best response]). Score range for total score is 22 to 110 and subscale score range for daily activity is 6 to 30, and for physical condition, psychological condition, and social attitude is 5 to 25. Less total/subscale scores reflect greater symptom severity and symptom impact on health-related QOL. (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Total score (n=2031)Daily activity (n=2034)Physical condition (n=2034)Psychological condition (n=2035)Social relationships (n=2034)
Leuprorelin Acetate88.727.921.818.816.3

[back to top]

Score of QOL-ACD-B Items 19, 20 and 21 at Baseline

QOL-ACD-B is a part of QOL-ACD (using questionnaire items 1 to 18). For questionnaire item 19 (Did you feel inferior to your child when you interact with him/her? [due to the impact of illness and treatment]), item 20 (Did you worry about child rearing? [due to the impact of illness and treatment]), and item 21 (Do you worry about pregnancy or delivery? [due to the impact of illness and treatment]), the calculation was based on the score of each item. Each item was scored on a 5-point scale, where 1 was the worst response and 5 was the best. (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Item 19: (n=631)Item 20: (n=624)Item 21: (n=203)
Leuprorelin Acetate3.32.91.7

[back to top]

QOL-ACD Total and Subscale Score at Week 48

QOL-ACD score is a score used for cancer participants treated with anti-cancer drug and is a 22-item self-reported instrument assessing differences in symptom severity and health-related QOL. It includes 4 subscale domains: Daily Activities, Physical Condition, Social Activities, Mental and Psychological Status. Total and subscale scores are calculated as sum of items within each subscale: Daily Activity (items 1-6), Physical Condition (7-11), Psychological Condition (12-16), Social Attitude (17-21) and total (1-22). Face scale: 5-point score for 1 item (22). Participants answer each question on a 5-point scale (1: not at all [worst response] to 5: very much [best response]). Score range for total score is 22 to 110 and subscale score range for daily activity is 6 to 30, and for physical condition, psychological condition, and social attitude is 5 to 25. Less total/subscale scores reflect greater symptom severity and symptom impact on health-related QOL. (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Total score (n=1658)Daily activity (n=1662)Physical condition (n=1662)Psychological condition (n=1662)Social relationships (n=1662)
Leuprorelin Acetate89.928.122.219.116.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions

Adverse drug reactions are defined as adverse events (AE) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. AE are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Leuprorelin Acetate427

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Serious Adverse Drug Reactions

Serious adverse drug reactions are defined as serious adverse events (SAE) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The event was occurred in breast cancer female. (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Leuprorelin Acetate8

[back to top]

Score of QOL-ACD-B Items 19, 20 and 21 at Week 12

QOL-ACD-B is a part of QOL-ACD (using questionnaire items 1 to 18). For questionnaire item 19 (Did you feel inferior to your child when you interact with him/her? [due to the impact of illness and treatment]), item 20 (Did you worry about child rearing? [due to the impact of illness and treatment]), and item 21 (Do you worry about pregnancy or delivery? [due to the impact of illness and treatment]), the calculation was based on the score of each item. Each item was scored on a 5-point scale, where 1 was the worst response and 5 was the best. (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Item 19 (n=574)Item 20 (n=566)Item 21 (n=180)
Leuprorelin Acetate3.53.31.8

[back to top]

Score of QOL-ACD-B Items 19, 20 and 21 at Week 48

QOL-ACD-B is a part of QOL-ACD (using questionnaire items 1 to 18). For questionnaire item 19 (Did you feel inferior to your child when you interact with him/her? [due to the impact of illness and treatment]), item 20 (Did you worry about child rearing? [due to the impact of illness and treatment]), and item 21 (Do you worry about pregnancy or delivery? [due to the impact of illness and treatment]), the calculation was based on the score of each item. Each item was scored on a 5-point scale, where 1 was the worst response and 5 was the best. (NCT02134977)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Item 19 (n=443)Item 20 (n=441)Item 21 (n=129)
Leuprorelin Acetate3.53.21.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions

Adverse drug reactions are defined as adverse events (AE) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. AE are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. (NCT02154139)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 96 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Leuprorelin Acetate128

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Serious Adverse Drug Reactions

Serious adverse drug reactions are defined as serious adverse events (SAE) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The event occurred was breast cancer female (NCT02154139)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 96 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Leuprorelin Acetate1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the first day of study treatment to documented disease progression or death on study (ie, death from any cause within 30 days of the last dose of study drug), whichever occurred first. Disease progression was at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. For patients who experienced no disease progression and did not die while on study, data were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate PFS. (NCT02154139)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 96 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Leuprorelin Acetate49.68

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Recurrence-free Survival Who Were Treated With the Drug as Adjuvant Therapy

Recurrence-free survival was determined in participants who were treated with the drug as adjuvant therapy, and tabulated, based on the date recurrence is confirmed, the presence or absence of recurrence, continued survival or death, and the date of death. (NCT02154139)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 96 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Leuprorelin Acetate95.37

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Advanced or Recurrent Breast Cancer (Best Response)

Best overall response for a participant is the best observed post-baseline disease response as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0 criteria. Objective response was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) determined on 2 consecutive occasions greater than or equal to (>=) 4 weeks apart, using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR: The disappearance of all target lesions and all non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker level, and no new lesions. PR: Disappearance of all target lesions and persistence of >= 1 non-target lesions and/or the maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits, or, at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, and no new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (NCT02154139)
Timeframe: Week 24, 48,96

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 24Week 48Week 96
Leuprorelin Acetate10.3412.0015.00

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on TNM Classification

PFS was defined as the time from the first day of study treatment to documented disease progression or death on study. For participants who experienced no disease progression and did not die while on study, data were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate PFS. TNM classification based on tumor size, if cancer cells had spread to nearby lymph nodes (LN), or distant metastasis. Stages included: stage 0(no evidence of cancer cells),stage 1(T1N0M0), stage IIA(T0N1M0, T1N1M0, T2N0M0), stage IIB(T2N1M0, T3N0M0), stage IIIA(T0N2M0, T1N2M0, T2N3M0, T3N1orN2M0),stage IIIb( T4 anyNM0, any TN3M0),stage IIIC(any TN3M0), stage IV(any T any NM1), where T0=early form of tumor, T1=<2 centimeter (cm), T2=2-5 cm, T3=>2 cm, T4=large sized, N0=not spread to LN, N1=spread to 1 to 3,N2=spread to 4 to 9,N3=spread >10 axillary LN, M0=no metastasis, M1= Metastasis. (NCT02167893)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 96 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Stage I (N=467)Stage II (N=4852)Stage III (N=1926)Stage IV (N=2446)
Leuprorelin Acetate94.292.086.955.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions

Adverse drug reactions are defined as adverse events (AEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. (NCT02167893)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Leuprorelin Acetate2052

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) Based on TNM Classification

OS was defined as the duration from randomization to death (due to any cause). Probability of OS was reported using Kaplan-Meier method. TNM classification based on tumor size, if cancer cells had spread to nearby lymph nodes (LN), or distant metastasis. Stages included: stage 0(no evidence of cancer cells),stage 1(T1N0M0), stage IIA(T0N1M0, T1N1M0, T2N0M0), stage IIB(T2N1M0, T3N0M0), stage IIIA(T0N2M0, T1N2M0, T2N3M0, T3N1orN2M0),stage IIIb( T4 anyNM0, any TN3M0),stage IIIC(any TN3M0), stage IV(any T any NM1), where T0=early form of tumor, T1=<2 centimeter (cm), T2=2-5 cm, T3=>2 cm, T4=large sized, N0=not spread to LN, N1=spread to 1 to 3,N2=spread to 4 to 9,N3=spread >10 axillary LN, M0=no metastasis, M1= Metastasis. (NCT02167893)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 96 weeks or death (which ever occurs first)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Stage I (N=466)Stage II (N=4852)Stage III (N=1927)Stage IV (N=2443)
Leuprorelin Acetate96.997.497.688.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Serious Adverse Drug Reactions

Serious adverse drug reactions are defined as serious adverse events (SAE) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. (NCT02167893)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 96

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Leuprorelin Acetate188

[back to top]

Absolute Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (Randomized Cohort)

The absolute change in score by group from baseline up to month 12 on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was used to measure the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile function with lower numbers indicating less change in symptoms. Seven questions with scores ranging from 1-5 are summed to create a total score. Scores of 1-7 indicate mild symptoms, scores of 8-19 indicate moderate symptoms, and scores of 20-35 indicate severe symptoms. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)2
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-2

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Last Question on International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (Randomized Cohort)

The absolute change in score by group from baseline up to month 12 on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was used to measure the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile function. The last question on the IPSS can be looked at separately from the total score as it asks the participants to rate the overall quality of life due to their existing urinary symptoms on a scale of 0-6, with lower scores indicating a better quality of life. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)0
Arm II (STAND Clinic)0

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Scores (Randomized Cohort)

"The absolute change in scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) from baseline after 12 months of study participation for participants was used to measure depression symptoms with a higher number indicating a greater percentage of change in scores. The total Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score is calculated by combining the responses of the participant on questions addressing how bothered the participant has been by various problems over the past 2 weeks. Each of the 9 items is scored on a scale of 0 (Not bothered at all) to 4 (Nearly every day). A total score of 5-9='Mild Depression Symptoms, 10-4=Minor Depression, Major Depression (mild), or Dysthymia, 15-19=Major Depression, moderately severe, and >20=Major Depression.~Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test." (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)0
Arm II (STAND Clinic).50

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Percentage Body Fat Mass as Measured by Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer (Randomized Cohort)

The absolute change from baseline in percentage body fat after 12 months of study participation for participants in the randomized cohort was measured using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer and between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of body fat mass (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)-1
Arm II (STAND Clinic)6.8

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Percentage of Body Fat (Randomized Cohort)

Metabolic and cardiac impact for participants in the randomized cohort was measured by calculating the absolute change in percentage of body fat from the baseline to the month 12 assessment. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of body fat (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)-1
Arm II (STAND Clinic)6.8

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Serum 25-(OH) Vitamin D (Randomized Cohort)

The absolute change in bone health parameters as measured by the serum 25-(OH) vitamin D level from the baseline to the month 12 assessment. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)3.60
Arm II (STAND Clinic)8.10

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Waist Circumference (Randomized Cohort)

Metabolic and cardiac impact for participants in the randomized cohort was measured by calculating the absolute change in waist circumference from the baseline to the month 12 assessment. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventioncentimeters (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)5
Arm II (STAND Clinic)1.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants in the Non-randomized, Pilot, Cohort Who Completed Clinic Visits

The percentage of participants in the pilot, non-randomized cohort who completed clinic visits for Supportive Therapy in Androgen Deprivation (STAND) will be reported to assess feasibility. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Non-Randomized Pilot Cohort62.5

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Blood Pressure (Randomized Cohort)

Metabolic and cardiac impact for participants in the randomized cohort was measured by calculating the absolute change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure from the baseline to month 12 assessment. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

,
InterventionmmHg (Median)
Systolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure
Arm I (Standard of Care)102
Arm II (STAND Clinic)9-3

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Bone Density T-score (Randomized Cohort)

The absolute change in bone density t-scores from the baseline to the month 12 assessment for participants in the randomized cohort was measured using bone density at the lumbar spine, bone density at the femoral neck, and bone density at the total hip. A T-score of -1.0 or above is normal bone density. A T-score between -1.0 and -2.5 indicates low bone density or osteopenia. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

,
Interventiont-score (Median)
Bone density at the lumbar spineBone density at the femoral neckBone density of total hip
Arm I (Standard of Care)-2.0-0.25-0.20
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-0.40-0.20-0.10

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26) Scores to Assess Erectile and Urinary Function (Randomized Cohort)

The EPIC-26 was measured at baseline and month 12 to determine the impact of quality of life issues across 5 prostate cancer specific domains: Urinary incontinence, Urinary irritation, Bowel function, Sexual function, and Hormonal function and overall total quality of life. Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale, and the raw score of each item is then transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale. Multiple items are combined and then averaged to form the domain scores and total score at each time point also ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health related quality of life (HRQOL). Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
TotalUrinary incontinenceUrinary irritationBowel functionSexual functionHormonal Function
Arm I (Standard of Care)-4.910-5.000-12.500
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-3.8505.00-4.17-2.08-17.50

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Fasting Lipids (Randomized Cohort)

Metabolic and cardiac impact for participants in the randomized cohort was measured by calculating the absolute change in fasting lipids which includes total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein, High density lipoprotein, and triglycerides levels from the baseline to the month 12 assessment. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

,
Interventionmilligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (Median)
Total CholesterolLow density lipoproteinHigh density lipoproteinTriglycerides
Arm I (Standard of Care)4-4519
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-1-47-3

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Hours Per Week of Physical Activity Category as Measured by the Exercise Pattern Assessment (Randomized Cohort)

Metabolic impact for participants from baseline to 12 months was measured using an exercise pattern questionnaire. The questionnaire measured self-reported average total time per week over the past year the participant participated in various physical activities such as walking, tennis, yoga, swimming, etc. Twelve response options for each activity are as follows: None, 1-4 minutes (min), 5-19 min, 20-39 min, 40-89 min, 1.5 hours, 2-3 hours, 4-6 hours, 7-10 hours, 11-20 hours, 21-30 hours, 31-40 hours, 40+ hours. The amount of time per week spent on each activity was converted to a hourly scale and the absolute change between baseline and month 12 times were calculated for each participant. The median absolute change in hours per week were compared for each of the 6 activity categories: non-vigorous, moderate, moderate-vigorous, vigorous, and total physical activity and total moderate and vigorous activity combined. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

,
Interventionhours per week (Median)
Non-vigorous physical activityModerate physical activityVigorous physical activityTotal physical activityTotal Moderate-Vigorous physical activity (MVPA)
Arm I (Standard of Care)-0.620.00-0.20-.30-0.30
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-1.030.00-0.02-.90-0.08

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Lee Fatigue Scale Scores (Randomized Cohort)

"The absolute change in Lee Fatigue Scale from baseline to month 12 was used to measure the impact of Fatigue on a participants quality of life. The scale consists of 18 items relating to the subjective experience of fatigue. Each item asks respondents to place an X representing how they currently feel, along a visual analogue line that extends between two extremes (e.g., from not at all tired to extremely tired). Each line is 100 mm in length - thus, scores fall between 0 and 100. The instrument also possesses two subscales: fatigue (items 1-5 and 11-18) and energy (items 6-10). The fatigue subscale score is calculated as the mean of the 13 fatigue items, and the energy subscale score is the mean of the 5 energy items. Higher scores on the fatigue subscale represent greater fatigue severity, and higher scores on the energy subscale indicate higher levels of energy. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test." (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Fatigue ScaleEnergy Scale
Arm I (Standard of Care)5.68-0.10
Arm II (STAND Clinic)3.151.30

[back to top]

Absolute Change in the 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Assessment Item Scores for Patients in the Randomized Cohort

The SF-12 is a 12-item questionnaire used to assess generic health outcomes from the patient's perspective. The SF-12 consists of a subset of 12 items from the SF-36® Health Survey (SF-36) and measures two composite outcomes assessing mental health composite score (MCS) and physical health composite scores (PCS). The PCS & MCS are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health. The absolute change in item score by group from baseline up to 12 months was used to assess the quality of life/psychosocial impact on the patients with a larger scores indicating a greater degree of change on physical and mental health. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Mental Composite ScorePhysical Composite Score
Arm I (Standard of Care)4.81-2.90
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-2.37-1.60

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Hemoglobin A1c (Randomized Cohort)

Metabolic and cardiac impact for participants in the randomized cohort was measured by calculating the absolute change in percentage hemoglobin A1c from the baseline to the month 12 assessment. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)-0.1
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-0.1

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Attention Function Index (AFI) Scores (Randomized Cohort)

The AFI measures a participants perceived effectiveness in functioning at time of assessment. Each of the 16 items consists of a 100 mm horizontal line anchored with opposite phrases from not at all (0 mm) to extremely well or a great deal (100 mm). Subjects are asked to place a mark on the line that best describes functioning in relation to specific activity. Scores for each item are determined by measuring distance from lower end of scale in millimeters. The total score on the instrument is computed by obtaining an average of 16 scales. The absolute change in score by group from baseline up to month 12 in Attention Function Index was used to measure perceived effectiveness in common activities requiring attention and working memory in daily life with a higher number indicating a greater absolute change in scores. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)2.31
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-4

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Average Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) as Measured by an Ambulatory Accelerometer Assessment (Randomized Cohort)

"Metabolic impact for participants in each group from baseline to 12 months was measured by using an ambulatory accelerometer worn by participants around their waist for 7 consecutive days. Participants were required at least 3 days of valid wear time, defined as >= 10 hours of wear per day. The accelerometer measured movement intensity and recorded vertical acceleration as counts, providing an indication of the intensity of physical activity associated with locomotion. Non-wear time was identified using Troiano 2007 default settings in the ActiLife v6.13.3 software. The amount of time participants were engaged in moderate to vigorous physical activities (MVPA) was measured by accelerometer as counts per minute (moderate activity = 2020-5998 counts per minute, and vigorous activity = 5999 or more counts per minute). Counts are then transformed into minutes per day with a total range of 0-1440 minutes. The median absolute change in average MVPA was compared between the two groups." (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionminutes per day (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)-18.40
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-2.36

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Body Weight (Randomized Cohort)

Metabolic and cardiac impact for participants in the randomized cohort was measured by calculating the absolute change in body weight from the baseline to month 12 assessment. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionkilograms (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)0.8
Arm II (STAND Clinic)2.6

[back to top] [back to top]

Absolute Change in Insulin Resistance Score (Randomized Cohort)

Metabolic and cardiac impact for participants in the randomized cohort was measured by calculating the absolute change in insulin resistance scores from the baseline to the month 12 assessment. Insulin resistance scores were calculated using the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR). This calculation marks for both the presence and extent of any insulin resistance that participants might currently express. The HOMA-IR is an assessment using insulin and glucose lab values to generate an insulin resistance score. A healthy score range is 1.0 (0.5-1.4). A score of less than 1.0 means you are insulin-sensitive which is optimal. A score above 1.9 indicates early insulin resistance. A score above 2.9 indicates significant insulin resistance. Between group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. (NCT02168062)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Arm I (Standard of Care)0
Arm II (STAND Clinic)-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to Cycle 1, 2, and 3 in Percentage of Days With Pain >=4 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD

Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The percentage of days with pain >=4 within a 28-day window was calculated as 100 divided by the number of non-missing days within that 28-day window multiplied by the number of days within that window where Item 1 of the ESD was >=4. Here, number of subjects 'n' signifies evaluable subjects for the respective category. (NCT02203331)
Timeframe: Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3)

,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Change at Treatment 1Change at Treatment 2Change at Treatment 3
ATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-15.1947-33.2423-35.1119
ATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-15.4147-26.8462-27.4770
ATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-15.1334-26.4468-32.2600
LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-12.8228-22.4950-23.5498
Placebo IVR + Leuprorelin Injection-21.4331-37.7330-53.4266
Placebo IVR + Placebo Injection-14.5323-30.9527-33.3421

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to Cycle 1, 2, and 3 in Percentage of Days With Pain >=7 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD

Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The percentage of days with pain >=7 within a 28-day window was calculated as 100 divided by the number of non-missing days within that 28-day window multiplied by the number of days within that 28-day window where item 1 of the ESD was >=7. Here, number of subjects 'n' signifies evaluable subjects for the respective category. (NCT02203331)
Timeframe: Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3)

,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Change at Treatment 1Change at Treatment 2Change at Treatment 3
ATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-13.3722-22.3713-22.9682
ATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-12.5862-17.2826-20.8529
ATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-15.0341-20.6791-25.3052
LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-13.6756-24.1404-26.4197
Placebo IVR + Leuprorelin Injection-19.8898-36.3540-39.9516
Placebo IVR + Placebo Injection-16.0105-26.9979-28.4273

[back to top]

Percentage of Days During Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) and Cycles 1, 2, and 3 With Pain >=4 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD

Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The percentage of days with pain >=4 within a 28-day window was calculated as 100 divided by the number of non-missing days within that 28-day window multiplied by the number of days within that window where Item 1 of the ESD was >=4. Here, number of subjects 'n' signifies evaluable subjects for the respective category. (NCT02203331)
Timeframe: Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3)

,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Treatment 1Treatment 2Treatment 3
ATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection70.650452.602850.7332
ATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection69.309257.877757.0171
ATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection73.895662.582256.7691
LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection71.803761.819960.2902
Placebo IVR + Leuprorelin Injection70.206654.096538.6986
Placebo IVR + Placebo Injection65.907449.48747.0976

[back to top]

Percentage of Days During Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) and Cycles 1, 2, and 3 With Pain Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 7 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD

Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The percentage of days with pain >=7 within a 28-day window was calculated as 100 divided by the number of non-missing days within that 28-day window multiplied by the number of days within that 28-day window where item 1 of the ESD was >=7. (NCT02203331)
Timeframe: Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3)

,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Treatment 1Treatment 2Treatment 3
ATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection23.932214.933114.3362
ATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection27.565922.869519.9332
ATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection40.081334.436429.8103
LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection35.603425.625723.1293
Placebo IVR + Leuprorelin Injection28.201512.13208.5351
Placebo IVR + Placebo Injection25.174214.186912.7574

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 1-28) and to Second Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 29-56) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD

Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The mean pain of the 7 days with worst EAPP within a 28-day window was calculated as the sum of ESD item 1 on 7 days with worst EAPP within that 28-day window divided by 7. (NCT02203331)
Timeframe: Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), first cycle (Treatment 1) (Day 1-28), second cycle (Treatment 2) (Day 29-56)

,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change at Treatment 1Change at Treatment 2
ATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-1.0000-1.9959
ATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-0.6849-1.5126
ATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-1.1463-2.1224
LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-0.7582-1.6447
Placebo IVR + Leuprorelin Injection-1.2071-2.8607
Placebo IVR + Placebo Injection-0.9048-1.8022

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Mean Pain From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment(Day1-28), Second Cycle Under Study Treatment(Day29-56),Third Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question1 of ESD

Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The mean pain within a 28-day window was calculated as the sum of ESD item 1 within that 28-day window divided by the number with non-missing days within that 28-day window. Here, number of subjects 'n' signifies evaluable subjects for the respective category. (NCT02203331)
Timeframe: Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), first cycle (Treatment 1) (Day 1-28), second cycle (Treatment 2) (Day 29-56), and third cycle (Treatment 3) (last 28 days of the treatment period, Day 57-84)

,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Treatment 1Change at Treatment 2Change at Treatment 3
ATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection5.7128-1.1257-1.9615-2.1268
ATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection5.7409-0.9009-1.5068-1.6411
ATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection6.3694-1.0931-1.7349-2.0112
LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection6.0938-0.8472-1.5774-1.8001
Placebo IVR + Leuprorelin Injection6.3962-1.5315-2.6855-3.502
Placebo IVR + Placebo Injection5.6399-0.9777-1.8994-2.2228

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD

Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, participants were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The mean pain of the 7 days with worst EAPP within a 28-day window was calculated as the sum of ESD item 1 on 7 days with worst EAPP within that 28-day window divided by 7. (NCT02203331)
Timeframe: Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), end of treatment (Treatment 3) (last 28 days of the treatment period, Day 57-84)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-1.8974
ATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-1.6061
ATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-2.4014
ATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-2.2653
Placebo IVR + Leuprorelin Injection-3.7679
Placebo IVR + Placebo Injection-2.293

[back to top]

Profiles of Testesterone Concentration (ng/dL) Following Injections of the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP)

The PD effects of leuprolide were assessed by measuring serum testosterone concentrations during the trial. The following PD variable was analyzed: The profiles of testosterone concentration (ng/dL) following injections of the IMP. Blood samples for analyses of serum testosterone concentrations were collected at Screening and on Days 0 to 126. (NCT02212197)
Timeframe: Days 0-126

,,
Interventionng/dL (Median)
Day 0 (predose)Day 28 (predose)Day 56 (predose)Day 84Day 126
CAM2032 3.75 mg44320.914.614.8423
CAM2032 7.5 mg32124.513.810.6278
Eligard 7.5 mg35018.11212.485.8

[back to top]

Observed Maximum Serum Leuprolide Concentration (Cmax) for Dose 1 and Dose 3

Blood samples for analysis of serum leuprolide concentrations were collected at pre-determined time points throughout the trial (with full PK profiles after Dose 1 and Dose 3). The PK parameter, Cmax was derived for Doses 1 and 3 of the investigational medicinal product (IMP). (NCT02212197)
Timeframe: 84 days

,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Dose 1Dose 3
CAM2032 3.75 mg6.145.36
CAM2032 7.5 mg9.6611.3
Eligard 7.5 mg13.612.1

[back to top]

Mean Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Concentration

The PD effects of leuprolide were assessed by measuring serum PSA concentrations during the trial. The following PD variable was analyzed: PSA (ng/mL) response to IMP. Blood samples for analyses of plasma PSA concentrations were collected at Screening and on Days 0 to 126. (NCT02212197)
Timeframe: Days 0-126

,,
Interventionng/mL (Median)
Day 0 (predose)Day 28 (predose)Day 56 (predose)Day 84Day 126
CAM2032 3.75 mg14.993.62.34.7
CAM2032 7.5 mg18.88.35.82.63.1
Eligard 7.5 mg14.64.62.11.61.6

[back to top]

Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Over the Dosing Interval (AUCtau) for Dose 1 and Dose 3

Blood samples for analysis of serum leuprolide concentrations were collected at pre-determined time points throughout the trial (with full PK profiles after Dose 1 and Dose 3). The PK parameter, AUCtau was derived for Doses 1 and 3 of the IMP. (NCT02212197)
Timeframe: Days 0-28 and Days 56-84 (0-672 hours after Doses 1 and 3)

,,
Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Dose 1Dose 3
CAM2032 3.75 mg329343
CAM2032 7.5 mg622757
Eligard 7.5 mg397460

[back to top]

Apparent Terminal Half-life (t½) for Dose 1 and Dose 3

Blood samples for analysis of serum leuprolide concentrations were collected at pre-determined time points throughout the trial (with full PK profiles after Dose 1 and Dose 3). The PK parameter, t1/2 was derived for Doses 1 and 3 of the IMP. (NCT02212197)
Timeframe: Days 0-28 and Days 56-84

,,
Interventionhour (Mean)
Dose 1Dose 3
CAM2032 3.75 mg205299
CAM2032 7.5 mg231434
Eligard 7.5 mg743378

[back to top]

Time (Days) to Testosterone Recovery After Dose 3

The pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of leuprolide were assessed by measuring serum testosterone during the trial. Time to testosterone recovery after last dose of the IMP. Blood samples for analyses of serum testosterone concentrations were collected at Screening and on Days 0 to 126. (NCT02212197)
Timeframe: Days 56-126

Interventiondays (Mean)
CAM2032 3.75 mg46.2
CAM2032 7.5 mg52.3
Eligard 7.5 mg65

[back to top]

Efficacy of Leuprolide Mesylate (LMIS 50mg)

The percentage of subjects with a serum testosterone concentration suppressed to castrate levels (≤ 50 ng/dL) following the first injection of LMIS 50 mg from Day 28 through Day 336 (remaining duration of the study). (NCT02234115)
Timeframe: baseline to 28 days, 28 days to 336 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Mean)
Leuprolide Mesylate 50mg97.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Safety analysis was based on the safety information from the laboratory evaluations, AEs, and SAEs. (NCT02234115)
Timeframe: 336 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAEDrug-related AEsSAE
Leuprolide Mesylate 50mg1148520

[back to top]

Residual Cancer Burden (RCB)

RCB was analyzed using radical prostatectomy (RP) tissue. The largest area of tumor was measured by ruler and the longest tumor dimension in this area was used as the dimension for calculation. (NCT02268175)
Timeframe: after RP approximately 24 weeks from study entry

Interventioncm (Median)
ARM 10.03
ARM 20.05

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) or Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)

pCR is defined as the absence of morphologically identifiable carcinoma in the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen. MRD is defined as the largest cross-sectional dimension of residual tumor measuring NCT02268175)
Timeframe: after RP approximately 24 weeks from study entry

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ARM 130
ARM 216

[back to top]

Participants With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)

pCR is defined as the absence of morphologically identifiable carcinoma in the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen. (NCT02268175)
Timeframe: after RP approximately 24 weeks from study entry

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ARM 15
ARM 22

[back to top]

Median Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Nadir

PSA nadir is the lowest PSA level recorded during neoadjuvant therapy. (NCT02268175)
Timeframe: PSA was assessed at baseline and every cycle during neoadjuvant therapy (up to 24 weeks).

Interventionng/mL (Median)
ARM 10.03
ARM 20.02

[back to top]

Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Scores, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P) and Sexual Health in Men (SHIM)

"The FACT-P is the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate and measures physical/emotional quality of life in prostate cancer patients.~NUMBER OF ITEMS:39 PATIENT POPULATION:Prostate cancer patients 18 years and older RECALL PERIOD:Past 7 days RESPONSE SCALE:5 point Likert-type scale~SUBSCALE DOMAINS:~Physical Well-Being (PWB), Social/Family Well-Being (SWB), Emotional Well-Being (EWB), Functional Well-Being (FWB), Prostate Cancer Subscale (PCS)~SCORING:~Scores range from 0-158. In general, the higher the score, the better the quality of life.~Sexual Health in Men (SHIM). 5 item measure of erectile function. Total score is 1-25 with a higher score indicating better sexual health. Scores: no ED (SHIM total score, 22-25), mild (17-21), mild to moderate (12-16), moderate (8-11), and severe ED (1-7)." (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 7 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
SHIMFACT-P
Arm I (Enzalutamide)-3.71-4.5
Arm II (ADT)-3.4-1.93

[back to top]

Time to Radiographic Progression

Log rank test will be used to compare the distributions of above variables between the group treated with enzalutamide to the group on standard ADT. (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the earliest objective evidence of radiographic progression as defined per protocol, assessed up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug

InterventionMonths (Mean)
Arm I (Enzalutamide)NA
Arm II (ADT)11.474

[back to top]

Number of Patients With PSA Progression

PSA progression as defined by an increase in >= 50% from nadir and an absolute increase of at least 2 ng/mL above the nadir, occurring at least 12 weeks after start of therapy that is confirmed by two consecutive increases taken at least 2 weeks apart. Log rank test will be used to compare the distributions of above variables between the group treated with enzalutamide to the group on standard ADT. (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the earliest objective evidence of PSA progression as defined per protocol, assessed up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Enzalutamide)0
Arm II (ADT)1

[back to top]

Metabolic Syndrome Incidence, Summarized by the Proportion of Patients With at Least 3 of the 5 Pre-specified Criteria

Metabolic syndrome will be assessed at the beginning of each course and defined by the presence of 3 of the following five traits: abdominal obesity, defined as a waist circumference > 102 cm (> 40 in); serum triglycerides >= 150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L) or drug treatment for elevated triglycerides; serum HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dL (1 mmol/L) or drug treatment for low HDL; blood pressure >= 130/>= 85 mmHg or drug treatment for elevated blood pressure; and FPG >= 100 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L) or drug treatment for elevated blood glucose. (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Within the first 6 months of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Enzalutamide)4
Arm II (ADT)0

[back to top]

Metabolic Syndrome Incidence, Summarized by the Number of Patients With at Least 3 of the 5 Pre-specified Criteria

Metabolic syndrome will be assessed at the beginning of each course and defined by the presence of 3 of the following five traits: abdominal obesity, defined as a waist circumference > 102 cm (> 40 in); serum triglycerides >= 150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L) or drug treatment for elevated triglycerides; serum high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol < 40 mg/dL (1 mmol/L) or drug treatment for low HDL; blood pressure >= 130/>= 85 mmHg or drug treatment for elevated blood pressure; and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) >= 100 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L) or drug treatment for elevated blood glucose. (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Within the first 12 months of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Enzalutamide)5
Arm II (ADT)3

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events, Using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.1

The incidence of adverse events has been reported in the adverse events log for clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Enzalutamide10
Androgen Deprivation Therapy9

[back to top]

Change in Physical Function, as Measured by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).

The Short SPPB incorporates 3 validated portions to assess a patient's balance and mobility. SPPB scores range from zero to 12 possible points. SPPB score of 3-9 points in persons with no mobility disability indicates frailty; SPPB score of 10 or greater for persons with no sarcopenia and no mobility disability indicates robustness. The higher the score, the better the physical function. Will be measured as a continuous outcome. (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Difference between baseline and 12 months.

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm I (Enzalutamide)10.58
Arm II (ADT)10.94

[back to top]

Change in Markers of Inflammation, as Measured by Circulating Hs-CRP

Mean change in available samples from baseline to 12 months, presented in mg/dL (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Difference between baseline and 12 months.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Arm I (Enzalutamide)0.87
Arm II (ADT)6.42

[back to top]

Change in Bone Turnover Markers, as Measured by Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase

Will be assessed for each treatment group. Measurements will be taken at day 1 of each course. A paired t-test will test within an arm as to whether the change from baseline to 12 months is significantly different from zero. (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 12

Interventionmicrogram/L (Mean)
Arm I (Enzalutamide)-18.55
Arm II (ADT)-58.14

[back to top]

Change in Bone Turnover Markers as Measured by N-telopeptide

Will be assessed for each treatment group. Measurements will be taken at day 1 of each course. A paired t-test within an arm as to whether the change from baseline to 12 months is significantly different from zero. N-Telopeptide units - nM Bone Collagen Equivalent (BCE). (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 months

InterventionnM BCE (Mean)
Arm I (Enzalutamide)-3.05
Arm II (ADT)1.73

[back to top]

Change in Bone Density

"We will measure bone density via a DXA scanner, Left Femur and Right femur T scores will be added to a composite score. A paired t-test will test within an arm as to whether the change from baseline to twelve months is significantly different from zero.~The T-score is the standard deviation of how much bone density differs from the bone mass of an average healthy 30 year old. A score of 0 indicates no deviation from average. The following ranges are used:~T-score of -1.0 or above = normal bone density~T-score between -1.0 and -2.5 = low bone density, or osteopenia~T-score of -2.5 or lower = osteoporosis" (NCT02278185)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Enzalutamide-0.23
Androgen Deprivation Therapy0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Regression or no Progression in Tanner Staging at Week 96

Tanner assessment score was used to document the stage of development of puberty through the assessment of secondary sexual characteristics. Female pubertal development staged by pubic hair development and breast size; male pubertal development staged by size of the genitalia and development of pubic hair. Rated in 5 stages: stage 1 (no development) to 5 (adult-like development in quantity and size). Regression or no progression was defined as negative change (improvement) or no change in Tanner score at Week 96 compared to baseline. (NCT02427958)
Timeframe: Week 96

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
FemaleMale
Leuprorelin83.50

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

(NCT02427958)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Week 100

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Leuprorelin252

[back to top]

Tanner Scores: Boys - Development of External Genitalia (Change From Baseline)

Sexual development (physical signs) in puberty were assessed by Tanner staging, a system developed by Marshall and Tanner to categorize pubertal maturation. Tanner stages are commonly used to categorize pubertal maturation in terms of sequence, timing and tempo. Tanner Stages: the minimum is Stage 1 = pre-pubertal physical characteristics and the maximum is Stage 5 = fully matured (adult) physical characteristics. (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 3, Week 12Visit 5, Week 24Visit 6, Week 36End of Treatment, Week 48
Assigned Intervention-0.5-0.5-0.5-1.0

[back to top]

Bone Age Ratio to Chronological Age at Time of Measurement (Percent Change From Baseline)

Bone Age Ratio to Chronological Age at Time of Measurement is bone age/age at bone age assessment. (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 48

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Visit 5, Week 24End of Treatment, Week 48Minimum Post-baseline ValueMaximum Post-baseline Value
Assigned Intervention-3.25-4.90-6.15-1.89

[back to top]

Tanner Scores: Boys - Development of External Genitalia

Sexual development (physical signs) in puberty were assessed by Tanner staging, a system developed by Marshall and Tanner to categorize pubertal maturation. Tanner stages are commonly used to categorize pubertal maturation in terms of sequence, timing and tempo. Tanner Stages: the minimum is Stage 1 = pre-pubertal physical characteristics and the maximum is Stage 5 = fully matured (adult) physical characteristics. (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineVisit 3, Week 12Visit 5, Week 24Visit 6, Week 36End of Treatment, Week 48
Assigned Intervention3.02.52.52.52.0

[back to top]

Changes in the Ratio of LH/FSH

Changes in ratio of LH/FSH at each time point from Screening to End of Study (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Screening (Pre&Post GnRHa Stim Test), Baseline (0,1,4,6 hours Post-Injection), Week 4, Week 12 (Pre&Post GnRHa Stim Test), Week 20, Week 24 (Pre&Post GnRHa Stim Test), Week 36 (Pre&Post GnRHa Stim Test), Week 44, and Week 48 (Pre&Post GnRHa Stim Test)

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Screening: Pre GnRHa Stimulation TestScreening: Post GnRHa Stimulation TestBaselineBaseline: 1 hr Post InjBaseline: 1 hr Post Inj: Change from BaselineBaseline: 4 hr Post InjBaseline: 4 hr Post Inj: Change from BaselineBaseline: 6 hr Post InjBaseline: 6 hr Post Inj: Change from BaselineWeek 4Week 4: Change from BaselineWeek 12: Pre GnRHa Stim TestWeek 12: Pre GnRHa Stim Test: Change from BaselineWeek 12: Post GnRHa Stim TestWeek12: Post GnRHa Stim Test: Change from BaselineWeek 20Week 20: Change from BaselineWeek 24: Pre GnRHa Stim TestWeek 24: Pre GnRHa Stim Test: Change from BaselineWeek 24: Post GnRHa Stim TestWeek24: Post GnRHa Stim Test: Change from BaselineWeek 36: Pre GnRHa Stim TestWeek 36: Pre GnRHa Stim Test: Change from BaselineWeek 36: Post GnRHa Stim TestWeek36: Post GnRHa Stim Test: Change from BaselineWeek 44Week 44: Change from BaselineWeek 48: Pre GnRHa Stim TestWeek 48: Pre GnRHa Stim Test: Change from BaselineWeek 48: Post GnRHa Stim TestWeek48: Post GnRHa Stim Test: Change from Baselin
Assigned Intervention0.3872.1870.6042.4241.8562.1101.5421.6911.1230.8430.2330.565-0.0501.3420.7210.6540.0680.6110.0071.3200.7160.474-0.1251.0510.4610.517-0.0730.557-0.0331.0920.509

[back to top]

Height

Height at each available measurement point. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing height measurement collected prior to or on the date of first injection. (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Screening, Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 20, Week 24, Week 36, Week 44, and Week 48

Interventioncm (Mean)
ScreeningBaselineVisit 2, Week 4Visit 3, Week 12Visit 4, Week 20Visit 5, Week 24Visit 6, Week 36Visit 7, Week 44End of Treatment, Week 48
Assigned Intervention136.17136.61137.32138.52138.87139.78140.99141.81142.37

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Height

The percent change from baseline in height at each available post-baseline measurement. Percent change is defined as (((change from Baseline)/(Baseline)) x 100). (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 12, Week 20, Week 24, Week 36, Week 44, and Week 48

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Visit 2, Week 4Visit 3, Week 12Visit 4, Week 20Visit 5, Week 24Visit 6, Week 36Visit 7, Week 44End of Treatment, Week 48
Assigned Intervention0.51.41.92.33.33.94.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Suppression of FSH, Estradiol, Oestradiol (HS), and Testosterone Measured by Blood Levels.

The percentage of subjects with FSH, estradiol and testosterone suppression to prepubertal levels (FSH < 2.5 mIU/mL, estradiol < 20 pg/mL and testosterone < 28.4 ng/dL) at each available time point. (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Visit 3, Week 12 : FSHVisit 3, Week 12 : EstradiolVisit 3, Week 12 : Oestradiol (HS)Visit 3, Week 12 : TestosteroneVisit 5, Week 24 : FSHVisit 5, Week 24 : EstradiolVisit 5, Week 24 : Oestradiol (HS)Visit 5, Week 24 : TestosteroneVisit 6, Week 36 : FSHVisit 6, Week 36 : EstradiolVisit 6, Week 36 : Oestradiol (HS)Visit 6, Week 36 : TestosteroneEnd of Treatment, Week 48 : FSHEnd of Treatment, Week 48 : EstradiolEnd of Treatment, Week 48 : Oestradiol (HS)End of Treatment, Week 48 : Testosterone
Assigned Intervention3758562415958226575623256551

[back to top]

Tanner Scores: Boys and Girls - Pubic Hair

Sexual development (physical signs) in puberty were assessed by Tanner staging, a system developed by Marshall and Tanner to categorize pubertal maturation. Tanner stages are commonly used to categorize pubertal maturation in terms of sequence, timing and tempo. Tanner Stages: the minimum is Stage 1 = pre-pubertal physical characteristics and the maximum is Stage 5 = fully matured (adult) physical characteristics. (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineVisit 3, Week 12Visit 5, Week 24Visit 6, Week 36End of Treatment, Week 48
Assigned Intervention2.32.42.52.32.4

[back to top]

Tanner Scores: Boys and Girls - Pubic Hair (Change From Baseline)

Sexual development (physical signs) in puberty were assessed by Tanner staging, a system developed by Marshall and Tanner to categorize pubertal maturation. Tanner stages are commonly used to categorize pubertal maturation in terms of sequence, timing and tempo. Tanner Stages: the minimum is Stage 1 = pre-pubertal physical characteristics and the maximum is Stage 5 = fully matured (adult) physical characteristics. (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 3, Week 12Visit 5, Week 24Visit 6, Week 36End of Treatment, Week 48
Assigned Intervention0.10.10.10.1

[back to top]

Tanner Scores: Girls - Breast Development

Sexual development (physical signs) in puberty were assessed by Tanner staging, a system developed by Marshall and Tanner to categorize pubertal maturation. Tanner stages are commonly used to categorize pubertal maturation in terms of sequence, timing and tempo. Tanner Stages: the minimum is Stage 1 = pre-pubertal physical characteristics and the maximum is Stage 5 = fully matured (adult) physical characteristics. (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineVisit 3, Week 12Visit 5, Week 24Visit 6, Week 36End of Treatment, Week 48
Assigned Intervention3.22.72.62.52.4

[back to top]

Tanner Scores: Girls - Breast Development (Change From Baseline)

Sexual development (physical signs) in puberty were assessed by Tanner staging, a system developed by Marshall and Tanner to categorize pubertal maturation. Tanner stages are commonly used to categorize pubertal maturation in terms of sequence, timing and tempo. Tanner Stages: the minimum is Stage 1 = pre-pubertal physical characteristics and the maximum is Stage 5 = fully matured (adult) physical characteristics. (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 3, Week 12Visit 5, Week 24Visit 6, Week 36End of Treatment, Week 48
Assigned Intervention-0.5-0.6-0.6-0.7

[back to top]

GnRH Antagonist Evaluation

GnRH Antagonist Evaluation occurred for the two week period following each treatment and at each visit to assess flare symptoms. The percent of subjects who affirm (or whose parent/guardian affirms) each symptom domain in the global interview. (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 20, Week 24, Week 26, Week 36, Week 44, and Week 48

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Telephone Contact #1, Week 272175496Visit 2, Week 472175496Visit 3, Week 1272175496Visit 4, Week 2072175496Visit 5, Week 2472175496Telephone Contact #2, Week 2672175496Visit 6, Week 3672175496Visit 7, Week 4472175496End of Treatment, Week 4872175496
Any GnRH Antagonist Conditions Reported?Flare or hot flashesInjection site reactionsBurning/StingingPainBruisingRednessDifficulty in urinationBone PainAggravation of weakness or other muscle symptomsOnset of Allergic reactionsNo GnRH Antagonist conditions reported?
Assigned Intervention15
Assigned Intervention4
Assigned Intervention11
Assigned Intervention9
Assigned Intervention3
Assigned Intervention0
Assigned Intervention1
Assigned Intervention5
Assigned Intervention48
Assigned Intervention55
Assigned Intervention16
Assigned Intervention6
Assigned Intervention51
Assigned Intervention2
Assigned Intervention53
Assigned Intervention57

[back to top]

Changes in Height Velocity (Growth Rate)

Changes in height velocity (growth rate) at all study timepoints after Screening to end of study. Growth velocity is defined for each visit as change from baseline / [(number of weeks since baseline)/52]. Week 48: Change from Week 24 growth velocity is defined as change from week 24 to week 48 / [(number of weeks since week 24)/52]. (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 12, Week 20, Week 24, Week 36, Week 44, and Week 48

Interventioncm/year (Mean)
Visit 2, Week 4Visit 3, Week 12Visit 4, Week 20Visit 5, Week 24Visit 6, Week 36Visit 7, Week 44End of Treatment, Week 48End of Treatment, Week 48: Change from Week 24
Assigned Intervention8.898.306.666.906.486.236.375.79

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Suppression of Luteinizing Hormone Measured by Blood Levels.

Percentage of subjects with suppressed serum LH concentrations(<4 IU/L) 30 minutes post GnRHa stimulation test at all assessed timepoints. (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Visit 3, Week 12Visit 5, Week 24Visit 6, Week 36End of Treatment, Week 48
Assigned Intervention51545050

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Peak-Stimulated Luteinizing Hormone at 6 Months.

Luteinizing Hormone (LH) suppression is defined as peak-stimulated LH <4 IU/L. Peak stimulated LH refers to the maximum LH concentration measured 30 minutes after a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonst (GnRHa) stimulation test. (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Assigned Intervention54

[back to top]

Bone Age

Bone Age at each available measurement point. (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

Interventionyears (Mean)
BaselineVisit 5, Week 24End of Treatment, Week 48
Assigned Intervention11.0111.3011.65

[back to top]

Bone Age Progression

Bone age progression at each available post-baseline measurement point. Bone age progression is defined as (((change from baseline)/(baseline)) x 100), which is percent change from baseline. (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 48

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Visit 5, Week 24End of Treatment, Week 48Minimum Post-Baseline ValueMaximum Post-Baseline Value
Assigned Intervention2.916.812.916.63

[back to top]

Bone Age Ratio to Chronological Age at Start of Study

Bone age advancement was evaluated relative to chronological age at each given measurement point. Bone Age Ratio to Chronological Age at Start of Study is bone age/age at first injection. (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

InterventionRatio (Mean)
BaselineVisit 5, Week 24End of Treatment, Week 48Minimum Post-baseline ValueMaximum Post-baseline Value
Assigned Intervention1.381.421.471.421.47

[back to top]

Bone Age Ratio to Chronological Age at Start of Study (Percent Change From Baseline)

Bone age advancement was evaluated relative to chronological age at each given measurement point. Percent change from baseline is: 100 x (the change from baseline value at the post-baseline visit / baseline value). (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 48

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Visit 5, Week 24End of Treatment, Week 48Minimum Post-baseline ValueMaximum Post-baseline Value
Assigned Intervention2.916.812.916.63

[back to top]

Bone Age Ratio to Chronological Age at Time of Measurement

Bone Age Ratio to Chronological Age at Time of Measurement is bone age/age at bone age assessment. (NCT02452931)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 48

InterventionRatio (Mean)
BaselineVisit 5, Week 24End of Treatment, Week 48Minimum Post-baseline ValueMaximum Post-baseline Value
Assigned Intervention1.391.341.321.301.36

[back to top]

Median Time to Clinical Progression

Defined as the time from the start of study treatment to confirmed regional or distant metastases (NCT02508636)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Combination Therapy: Enzalutamide and LeuprolideNA

[back to top]

Median Time to Local Failure

Local failure was defined as the time from the start of treatment to a biopsy confirmed disease recurrence. (NCT02508636)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Combination Therapy: Enzalutamide and LeuprolideNA

[back to top]

Overall Median Change in EuroQol Group Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) During Treatment

The EQ-VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, similar to a ruler, where the endpoints are labelled with 100='The best health you can imagine' on one end and 0='The worst health you can imagine' on the other, with 50 being the midpoint and participants mark an X on the scale to indicate how their health is on the day of the visit. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflect the patient's own judgement. Changes in the EQ-VAS scores will be assessed during treatment and the overall median change in scores will be reported. (NCT02508636)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Combination Therapy: Enzalutamide and Leuprolide72

[back to top]

Overall Median Change in Fasting Glucose Levels During Treatment

Changes in fasting glucose levels results will be assessed during treatment and the overall median change in fasting glucose levels will be reported. (NCT02508636)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
Combination Therapy: Enzalutamide and Leuprolide-2.7

[back to top]

Overall Median Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Levels During Treatment

HbA1C test results are reported as a percentage. The higher the percentage, the higher your blood sugar levels over the past two to three months. Changes in HbA1c results will be assessed during treatment and the overall median change in HbA1c will be reported. (NCT02508636)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionpercentage (Median)
Combination Therapy: Enzalutamide and Leuprolide0.2

[back to top]

Median Time to Biochemical Failure

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir >=2 ng/mL, also known as the Phoenix definition, is the definition most commonly used to establish biochemical failure (BF) after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer management. Time to biochemical failure is defined as the time from start of treatment to the time of change in PSA >=2 ng/mL from the nadir. (NCT02508636)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Combination Therapy: Enzalutamide and Leuprolide36

[back to top]

Overall Median Change in Lipid Levels During Treatment

Changes in fasting lipid levels will be assessed during treatment and the overall median change in fasting lipid levels will be reported. (NCT02508636)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
Combination Therapy: Enzalutamide and Leuprolide0

[back to top]

Overall Median Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Levels During Treatment

Changes in fasting LDL levels will be assessed during treatment and the overall median change in fasting LDL will be reported. (NCT02508636)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
Combination Therapy: Enzalutamide and Leuprolide0

[back to top]

Overall Median Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Fatigue Scores During Treatment

A PROMIS score of 50 is the average (or mean) score for a specific, relevant group of people under investigation. That group is the reference population. The PROMIS measures the responses use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. A score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population and a score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (e.g., more Fatigue). Changes in the PROMIS fatigue scores will be assessed during treatment and the overall median change in scores will be reported. (NCT02508636)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Combination Therapy: Enzalutamide and Leuprolide0

[back to top]

Overall Median Change in Total Cholesterol Levels During Treatment

Changes in total cholesterol levels will be assessed during treatment and the overall median change in total cholesterol levels will be reported. (NCT02508636)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
Combination Therapy: Enzalutamide and Leuprolide12

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Median Change in High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Levels During Treatment

Changes in fasting HDL levels will be assessed during treatment and the overall median change in fasting HDL will be reported. (NCT02508636)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
Combination Therapy: Enzalutamide and Leuprolide12

[back to top]

Overall Median Change in EuroQol Group Five Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D) During Treatment

EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for measuring generic health status. The health status is measured in terms of five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The respondents self-rate their level of severity for each dimension by selecting one of the following responses: no problems (0), slight problems (1), mild problems (2), moderate problems (3), or severe problems (4) with a particular dimension. Lower scores indicate less issues/problems with that particular health dimension. Changes in the EQ-5D scores will be assessed during treatment and the overall median change in scores will be reported. (NCT02508636)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
MobilitySelf-CareUsual ActivitiesPain/DiscomfortAnxiety/Depression
Combination Therapy: Enzalutamide and Leuprolide00000

[back to top]

Overall Median Change in Score on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) During Treatment

The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) is a comprehensive instrument designed to evaluate patient function and bother after prostate cancer treatment and assesses the disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and its therapies and comprises four summary domains (Urinary, Bowel, Sexual and Hormonal). Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale, and multi-item scale scores are transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing better health related quality of life. Changes in EPIC scores will be assessed during treatment and the overall median change in scores will be reported. (NCT02508636)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Urinary incontinenceUrinary Irritative/ObstructiveBowelSexualHormonal
Combination Therapy: Enzalutamide and Leuprolide6.256.250-44.4-20

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Regional or Distant Metastases Over Time

The number of participants with confirmed regional or distant metastases at 24 and 36 months will be reported. (NCT02508636)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Month 24Month 36
Combination Therapy: Enzalutamide and Leuprolide00

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Achieving a Prostate Specific Antigen-Complete Response (PSA-CR)

A PSA measurement will be obtained at 120-127 days after initiation of androgen deprivation therapy. The proportion of patients achieving a PSA-CR (PSA nadir <=0.3) at 120-127 days will be determined. (NCT02508636)
Timeframe: Up to 127 days

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Combination Therapy: Enzalutamide and Leuprolide0.818

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Total PBAC Score of <10 for 6 Weeks Before the Final Dose of Study Drug

PBAC score was used to measure volume of menstrual blood loss. Participants used sanitary products designated by sponsor and recorded the numbers of tampons or towels used, clots and flooding in patient diary. Three diagrams used which represented a lightly, moderately stained or completely saturated pad/tampon. Following scores assigned: 1) 1, 5, or 20 points for each pad; 2) 1, 5, or 10 points for each tampon; 3) 1 or 5 points for each blood clot of <1 cm/=1 cm/>1 in longest diameter; 4) 5 points for each episode of flooding. The total PBAC score (sum of points) ranges from 0 to >500. (NCT02655237)
Timeframe: For 6 weeks before the final dose of study drug (up to Week 24)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix 40 mg79.0
Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg92.3

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS-QOL)- Symptom Severity Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and Follow-up

UFS-QOL was a 37-item self-reporting tool for evaluating QOL in participants with uterine fibroid. It includes eight symptom-related questions and 29 HRQL questions across six subscales (concern, activities, energy/mood, control, self-consciousness, sexual function). The total symptom severity score is ranging from 0 to 100. The higher scores indicate greater severity. (NCT02655237)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and Follow-up (up to Week 28)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 16Change at Week 20Change at Week 24Change at Follow-Up (up to Week 28)
Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg-4.5-17.2-23.0-24.4-24.3-25.3-25.4
Relugolix 40 mg-5.5-19.5-21.0-21.4-21.9-22.5-20.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS-QOL)- HRQL Total Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and Follow-up

UFS-QOL was a 37-item self-reporting tool for evaluating QOL in participants with uterine fibroid. It includes eight symptom-related questions and 29 HRQL questions across six subscales (concern, activities, energy/mood, control, self-consciousness, sexual function). The total HRQL score is ranging from 0 to 100. The higher scores indicate better QOL. (NCT02655237)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and Follow-up (up to Week 28)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 16Change at Week 20Change at Week 24Change at Follow-Up (up to Week 28)
Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg3.59.513.314.314.515.815.7
Relugolix 40 mg2.48.110.410.911.512.010.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and Follow up

Anemia-related measurements consisted of hemoglobin, which were determined at the central laboratory. (NCT02655237)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and Follow up (up to Week 28)

,
Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 16Change at Week 20Change at Week 24Change at Follow-Up (up to Week 28)
Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg0.601.101.311.421.581.651.75
Relugolix 40 mg0.791.201.381.401.471.561.25

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values of Vital Signs

Vital signs included sitting blood pressure (after the participant has rested for at least 5 minutes), body temperature (oral or tympanic measurement) (degree Celsius [°C]) and pulse (beats per minute [bpm]) is reported. (NCT02655237)
Timeframe: Up to Week 28

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Systolic Blood Pressure Lower (<85 mmHg)Systolic Blood Pressure Upper (>180 mmHg)Diastolic Blood Pressure Lower (<50 mmHg)Diastolic Blood Pressure Upper (>110 mmHg)Pulse Rate Lower (<50 bpm)Body temperature Lower (<35.6 °C)Body temperature Upper (>37.7 °C)
Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg21531230
Relugolix 40 mg30520231

[back to top] [back to top]

Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score

Pain symptoms were evaluated using the NRS score. NRS score is a self-reported instrument assessing pain from 0 to 10. Higher scores reflect greater level of pain. (NCT02655237)
Timeframe: From Week 6 to 12, from Week 2 to 6, from Week 18 to 24, and for 6 weeks before the final dose (up to Week 24)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Week 6 to 12Week 2 to 6Week 18 to 24For 6 weeks before the final dose (up to Week 24)
Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg0.140.270.110.12
Relugolix 40 mg0.210.320.120.14

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Had One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. (NCT02655237)
Timeframe: Up to Week 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Relugolix 40 mg131
Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg139

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Uterine Volumes at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24

"A transvaginal ultrasound was performed for determination of uterine volumes. On the assumption that the uterus was spheroids, the uterine volumes were calculated using 3 diameters (D1, D2, and D3) measured as shown below: D1: the longest diameter of the uterus (unit of length: cm); D2: the longest diameter of the uterus which was perpendicular to D1 (unit of length: cm); D3: the diameter of the uterus which crossed the intersection of D1 and D2 (intersection Z) and was perpendicular to D1/D2 plane (unit of length: cm). The formula used for calculation is Uterine volume=D1*D2*D3*π/6." (NCT02655237)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24

,
Interventioncm^3 (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 24
Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg-6.90-17.80-33.83-38.85-45.73
Relugolix 40 mg-22.05-28.07-34.73-39.79-44.87

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values of Laboratory Test

Number of participants with any markedly abnormal values in laboratory tests collected throughout study is reported. WBC = White blood cells, AST = Aspartate Aminotransferase, ALT = Alanine Aminotransferase, GGT = gamma-glutamyl transferase, ULN = upper limit of normal or upper reference limit. (NCT02655237)
Timeframe: Up to Week 28

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
WBC Upper (>1.5×ULN×10^3 cells/μL)Eosinophils Upper (>2×ULN×10^3 cells/μL)Total cholesterol Upper (>300 mg/dL)Triglycerides Upper (>2.5×ULN mg/dL)Creatine kinase Upper (>5×ULN U/L)AST Upper (>3×ULN U/L)ALT Upper (>3×ULN U/L)GGT Upper (>3×ULN U/L)Hemoglobin A1c Upper (>7%)
Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg0441200262
Relugolix 40 mg1364123100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Total PBAC Score of <10 From Week 6 to 12

PBAC score was used to measure volume of menstrual blood loss. Participants used sanitary products designated by sponsor and recorded the numbers of tampons or towels used, clots and flooding in patient diary. Three diagrams used which represented a lightly, moderately stained or completely saturated pad/tampon. Following scores assigned: 1) 1, 5, or 20 points for each pad; 2) 1, 5, or 10 points for each tampon; 3) 1 or 5 points for each blood clot of <1 cm/=1 cm/>1 in longest diameter; 4) 5 points for each episode of flooding. The total PBAC score (sum of points) ranges from 0 to >500. (NCT02655237)
Timeframe: Week 6 to 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix 40 mg82.2
Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg83.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Total PBAC Score of <10 From Week 2 to 6

PBAC score was used to measure volume of menstrual blood loss. Participants used sanitary products designated by sponsor and recorded the numbers of tampons or towels used, clots and flooding in patient diary. Three diagrams used which represented a lightly, moderately stained or completely saturated pad/tampon. Following scores assigned: 1) 1, 5, or 20 points for each pad; 2) 1, 5, or 10 points for each tampon; 3) 1 or 5 points for each blood clot of <1 cm/=1 cm/>1 in longest diameter; 4) 5 points for each episode of flooding. The total PBAC score (sum of points) ranges from 0 to >500. (NCT02655237)
Timeframe: Week 2 to 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix 40 mg64.2
Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg31.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Total PBAC Score of <10 From Week 18 to 24

PBAC score was used to measure volume of menstrual blood loss. Participants used sanitary products designated by sponsor and recorded the numbers of tampons or towels used, clots and flooding in patient diary. Three diagrams used which represented a lightly, moderately stained or completely saturated pad/tampon. Following scores assigned: 1) 1, 5, or 20 points for each pad; 2) 1, 5, or 10 points for each tampon; 3) 1 or 5 points for each blood clot of <1 cm/=1 cm/>1 in longest diameter; 4) 5 points for each episode of flooding. The total PBAC score (sum of points) ranges from 0 to >500. (NCT02655237)
Timeframe: Week 18 to 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix 40 mg84.1
Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg94.7

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Myoma Volumes at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24

"A transvaginal ultrasound was performed to determine myoma volumes. Only the largest myoma among those measurable at visit 1 was measured throughout the study. On the assumption that the myoma was spheroids, the myoma volumes were calculated using 3 diameters (D1, D2, and D3). D1: the longest diameter of the myoma; D2: the longest diameter of the myoma which was perpendicular to D1; D3: the diameter of the myoma which crossed the intersection of D1 and D2 (intersection Z) and was perpendicular to D1/D2 plane. The formula used for calculation is Myoma volume= D1*D2*D3*π/6." (NCT02655237)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24

,
Interventioncm^3 (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 24
Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg-6.68-22.44-40.62-46.87-53.71
Relugolix 40 mg-18.74-24.99-35.92-43.28-49.75

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs)

Adverse events were recorded from signed informed consent until end-of-trial. Adverse events with onset after start of IMP treatment, and within 3 months after (1 month=28 days) last dosing of IMP, were considered 'treatment-emergent' and are presented for the safety analysis set. (NCT02663908)
Timeframe: Start of IMP treatment until 3 months after last dosing of IMP

,
Interventionsubjects (Number)
AEsSAEsAE leading to death
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg2504711
Leuprolide 22.5 mg228449

[back to top] [back to top]

Intensity of AEs

"The intensity of AE was graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (version 4.02) 5-point scale.~AE were categorized as grade 1 Mild (minor; no specific medical intervention; asymptomatic laboratory findings only; marginal clinical relevance), Grade 2 Moderate (minimal intervention: local intervention; non-invasive intervention), Grade 3 Severe (significant symptoms, requiring hospitalization or invasive intervention; transfusion; elective interventional radiological procedure; therapeutic endoscopy or operation), Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling (complicated by acute, life-threatening metabolic or CV complications such as circulatory failure, hemorrhage, sepsis. Life-threatening physiologic consequences; need for intensive care or emergent invasive procedure; emergent interventional radiological procedure, therapeutic endoscopy or operation) and Grade 5 Death. Events with grades 3, 4 and 5 were categorized as severe." (NCT02663908)
Timeframe: Start of IMP treatment until 3 months after last dosing of IMP

,
Interventionsubjects (Number)
Mild AEModerate AESevere AE
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg22416059
Leuprolide 22.5 mg20013555

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total and Quality of Life (QoL) Scores

"Lower urinary tract symptoms were measured with the IPSS Version 1 (IPSS-1). The IPSS is a subject-administered questionnaire containing seven items to evaluate symptoms of urinary obstruction (incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, nocturia) over the preceding week. Each urinary symptom question was assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The total IPSS-1 score was then calculated as summation over the responses for all 7 questions. The total IPSS-1 score was transformed to a scale from 0 (lowest score) to 100 (highest score). Higher scores reflect higher severity of symptoms. The IPSS-1 included an additional single question to assess a subject's QoL in relation to his urinary symptoms; response to this question was analyzed separately and was not included in the total IPSS score. The score was similarly scaled from 0 to 100.~Change from baseline in IPSS Total and QoL scores are presented." (NCT02663908)
Timeframe: Baseline to Days 168 and 336 (end-of-trial)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
IPSS Total at Day 168IPSS, QoL at Day 168IPSS Total at Day 336IPSS, QoL at Day 336
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-0.000-0.115-0.795-0.281
Leuprolide 22.5 mg0.9070.0980.121-0.234

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) Global Score

"The DASI is a self-administered instrument developed to measure functional capacity in subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD). It contains 12 items referring to the present time, assessing the ability to perform physical tasks in five domains: personal care (1 item), ambulation (4 items), household tasks (4 items), sexual function (1 item) and recreation (2 items). Each question was answered by one of four options: 'yes with no difficulty' / 'yes, but with some difficulty' / 'no, I can't do this' / 'don't do this for other reasons'. A global score was calculated with a higher score indicating a higher functional capacity. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 58.2 points.~Change from baseline in DASI Global score is presented." (NCT02663908)
Timeframe: Baseline to Days 168 and 336 (end-of-trial)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change in DASI to Day 168Change in DASI to Day 336
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-2.65-2.18
Leuprolide 22.5 mg-1.08-3.01

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ) Global Score and Score Per Domain

"The CAQ is a self-administered questionnaire developed to measure heart-focused anxiety in persons with or without heart disease. It contains 18 items referring to the present time assessing cardiac anxiety in three domains: fear (8 items, each item could be scored between 0 never to 4 always, maximum total score 32), avoidance (5 items, each item could be scored between 0 never to 4 always, maximum total score 20) and attention (5 items, each item could be scored between 0 never to 4 always, maximum total score 20). A higher score indicated greater cardiac anxiety and the total score range was between 0 and 72.~Change from baseline in CAQ Global score and score per domain are presented." (NCT02663908)
Timeframe: Baseline to Days 168 and 336 (end-of-trial)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
CAQ global score (Day 168)CAQ domain score for Attention (Day 168)CAQ domain score for Avoidance (Day 168)CAQ domain score for Fear (Day 168)CAQ global score (Day 336)CAQ domain score for Attention (Day 336)CAQ domain score for Avoidance (Day 336)CAQ domain score for Fear (Day 336)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg0.0340.0300.155-0.0360.1020.0230.2280.075
Leuprolide 22.5 mg-0.011-0.0060.039-0.0480.051-0.0150.220-0.018

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Total Number of Coronary Artery By-pass Grafting (CABG) or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Procedures Over the Duration of the Trial

The total number of CABG or PCI procedures observed for each subject over the duration of the trial (NCT02663908)
Timeframe: First dose of IMP to Day 336 (end-of-trial)

InterventionEvents (Number)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg3
Leuprolide 22.5 mg6

[back to top]

Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Unstable Angina Requiring Hospitalization; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial

"Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict first confirmed (adjudicated) unstable angina requiring hospitalization. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported.~Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first." (NCT02663908)
Timeframe: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg0.7
Leuprolide 22.5 mg1.5

[back to top]

Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Stroke; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial

"Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict first confirmed (adjudicated) stroke. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported.~Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first." (NCT02663908)
Timeframe: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg1.1
Leuprolide 22.5 mg1.1

[back to top]

Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Occurrence of the Composite Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Endpoint; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial

"Composite MACE endpoint was defined as: death due to any cause, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke.~Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict first confirmed (adjudicated) occurrence of composite MACE over time. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported.~Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first." (NCT02663908)
Timeframe: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg5.5
Leuprolide 22.5 mg4.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Myocardial Infarction; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial

"Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict first confirmed (adjudicated) myocardial infarction. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported.~Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first." (NCT02663908)
Timeframe: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg1.8
Leuprolide 22.5 mg1.1

[back to top]

Time From Randomization to Failure in Progression-free Survival (PFS); Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial

"Time to failure in PFS was defined as the time, measured in days, from randomization to the first occurrence of either death, radiographic disease progression, introduction of additional prostate cancer therapies for progression, or PSA failure.~Subjects who discontinued treatment with IMP or withdrew from the trial were censored at the time of discontinuation/withdrawal.~Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict failure in PFS. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported." (NCT02663908)
Timeframe: From randomization to end-of-trial for each subject (subjects not censored at Day 336)

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg8.7
Leuprolide 22.5 mg10.0

[back to top]

Time From Randomization to Death Due to Any Cause; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial

"Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict death due to any cause. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported.~Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first." (NCT02663908)
Timeframe: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg2.9
Leuprolide 22.5 mg3.3

[back to top]

Changes in Vital Signs

"Number of subjects shifting from normal value(s) in vital signs (pulse and blood pressure) at baseline to clinically significant abnormal value(s) at end-of-trial are presented.~Note: Only subjects with appropriate baseline and post-baseline data are included in the evaluation." (NCT02663908)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 336 (end-of-trial)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg0
Leuprolide 22.5 mg1

[back to top]

Change in Utility, Based on EuroQol Group 5 Dimensions 5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)

"The EQ-5D-5L essentially consists of 2 systems - the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The EQ VAS is an overall estimation of the present health status. The results from the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire were converted into quality adjusted life year (QALY) units.~The QALY is estimated by combining the value of life (utility value) and length of life. Quality adjusted life years are based on a principle assuming that a year of life lived in perfect health is worth 1 QALY and that a year of life lived in a state of less than perfect health is worth less than 1." (NCT02663908)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 336 (end-of-trial)

InterventionQALY (Least Squares Mean)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg0.794
Leuprolide 22.5 mg0.796

[back to top]

Testosterone Levels at Days 28, 168 and 336 in the Degarelix and Leuprolide Treatment Groups

Median levels and interquartile ranges for serum testosterone at Days 28, 168, and 336 are presented. (NCT02663908)
Timeframe: Days 28, 168 and 336 (end-of-trial)

,
Interventionng/dL (Median)
Day 28Day 168Day 336
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg8.6508.6509.855
Leuprolide 22.5 mg14.4108.4758.650

[back to top]

Safety of the Multimodality Therapy as Assessed by Number of Participants With Neutropenia and Surgical or Radiation Toxicities

"To assess the safety and therapeutic benefit of multimodality therapy in men presenting with newly diagnosed oligometastatic prostate cancer (<5 sites of metastases). Safety is defined as the incidence of Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia and surgical- or radiation-induced toxicities.~Neutropenia is a lower than normal number of neutrophils (a type of white blood cell) in the blood. Although dependent on the specific laboratory, the normal number is of neutrophils is generally about 1500-7800 cells/microliter. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia refer to neutrophil levels <1,000-500 and <500, respectively. The average risk of docetaxel-induced Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia is about 35%. During the course of the study, if we had seen evidence that the risk of Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was >50%, the study would have been stopped." (NCT02716974)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Chemohormonal and Definitive Therapy26

[back to top]

Efficacy as Assessed by 2-year PSA Progression-free Survival Rate

To evaluate efficacy of multimodality therapy in men, defined as the 2 year PSA progression-free (PSA<0.2 ng/ml) survival among men who have non-castrate testosterone levels 2 years after enrollment. Number of participants (who have non-castrate testosterone levels 2 years after enrollment) with PSA progression-free survival. (NCT02716974)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Chemohormonal and Definitive Therapy17

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Recurrence

To investigate the time from an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (≤0.2 ng/mL) until the prostate-specific antigen is >0.2 over two time-points. (NCT02716974)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Chemohormonal and Definitive Therapy31

[back to top]

PSA, FKBP5, TMPRSS2, EZH2, H3K27, and UBE2C Expression (Via IHC) in Malignant Prostate Tissue After Neoadjuvant Leuprolide and Apalutamide Based on Genotype Status.

To evaluate PSA, FKBP5, TMPRSS2, EZH2, H3K27, and UBE2C tissue expression (via IHC) in malignant prostate tissue after treatment with Leuprolide and Apalutamide. (NCT02770391)
Timeframe: Up to 28 Days

InterventionnM (Mean)
PSA Homozygous (1245A)H3K27 Homozygous (1245A)PSA heterozygousH3K27 heterozygousPSA Homozygous (1245C)H3K27 Homozygous (1245C)
Apalutamide + Leuprolide Acetate1.151.6191.3931.6331.3750.744

[back to top]

Other Androgens Concentration in Benign Prostate Tissue After Neo-adjuvant Leuprolide and Apalutamide Based on Genotype Status.

To evaluate the differential effect of neoadjuvant leuprolide and ARN-509 on other androgens (testosterone (T), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), androstenediol, 5?-androstanedione (5?-dione), androstenedione (AD), androsterone and 5?-androstanediol) concentration in benign prostate tissue based on HSD3B1 genotype. (NCT02770391)
Timeframe: Up to 28 Days

InterventionnM (Mean)
DHT homozygous(1245A)T homozygous(1245A)DHEA homozygous(1245A)AD homozygous(1245A)DHT heterozygousT heterozygousDHEA heterozygousAD heterozygousDHT homozygous (1245C)T homozygous (1245C)AD homozygous (1245C)
Apalutamide + Leuprolide Acetate9.0666.90146.1108.3945.9174.92918.57886.0839.3454.7048.303

[back to top]

Other Androgens (DHT, T, DHEA, Androstenediol, 5α-dione, AD, Androsterone and 5α-androstanediol) Concentration in Malignant Prostate Tissue After Neo-adjuvant Leuprolide and Apalutamide Based on Genotype Status.

To evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant ARN-509 on other androgens (DHT, T, DHEA, androstenediol, 5?-dione, AD, androsterone and 5?-androstanediol) concentration in malignant prostate tissue after neoadjuvant leuprolide and ARN-509. (NCT02770391)
Timeframe: Up to 28 Days

InterventionnM (Mean)
DHT homozygous (1245A)T homozygous (1245A)DHEA homozygous (1245A)AD homozygous (1245A)DHT heterozygousT heterozygousDHEA heterozygousAD heterozygousDHT homozygous (1245C)T homozygous (1245C)DHEA homozygous (1245C)AD homozygous (1245C)
Apalutamide + Leuprolide Acetate8.8555.69122.9417.9745.2385.71924.5438.5932.6224.4891.4216.959

[back to top]

Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Concentration in Benign Prostate Tissue After a Combination Drug Treatment Based on Genotype Status

To evaluate the differential effect of neo-adjuvant leuprolide and ARN-509 on dihydrotestosterone (DHT) concentration in benign prostate tissue based on HSD3B1 genotype. (NCT02770391)
Timeframe: Up to 28 Days

InterventionnM (Mean)
homozygous (1245A)heterozygous (1254C)homozygous (1245C)
Apalutamide + Leuprolide Acetate9.0665.9179.345

[back to top]

PSA, FKBP5, TMPRSS2, EZH2, H3K27, and UBE2C Expression (Via qPCR) in Malignant Prostate Tissue After Neoadjuvant Leuprolide and Apalutamide Based on Genotype Status.

To evaluate PSA, FKBP5, TMPRSS2, EZH2, H3K27, and UBE2C tissue expression (via qPCR) in malignant prostate tissue after treatment with Leuprolide and Apalutamide. (NCT02770391)
Timeframe: Up to 28 Days

InterventionnM (Mean)
PSA homozygous (1245A)FKBP5 homozygous (1245A)TMPRSS2 homozygous (1245A)PSA heterozygousFKBP5 heterozygousTMPRSS2 heterozygousPSA homozygous (1245C)FKBP5 homozygous (1245C)TMPRSS2 homozygous (1245C)
Apalutamide + Leuprolide Acetate1.4741.3041.6031.1271.1271.7422.2212.2212.345

[back to top]

Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Concentration in Malignant Prostate Tissue After a Combination Drug Treatment Based on Genotype Status

To evaluate the differential effect of neo-adjuvant leuprolide and ARN-509 on dihydrotestosterone (DHT) concentration in malignant prostate tissue based on HSD3B1 genotype. (NCT02770391)
Timeframe: Up to 28 Days

InterventionnM (Mean)
homozygous (1245A)heterozygous (1254C)homozygous (1245C)
Apalutamide + Leuprolide Acetate8.8555.2382.622

[back to top]

Ovulation Rate - Measured by Number of Subjects With Progesterone Levels Not Less Than 3000 pg/mL

"Progesterone level is considered suppressed during the evaluation period if a value below pre-specified threshold (3000 pg/mL) was reported at least once during that period.~The days in row title indicate the evaluation interval." (NCT02807363)
Timeframe: Dosing period: Day 1 to Day 28 and 28 day Post-Dosing Period; 29 day is post dosing day 1

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Days 8, 15, 22, 28 and 29Days 15, 22, 28 and 29Days 22, 28 and 29Days 22 and 29Entire 28-day Dosing Period28-day Post-dosing Period
Leuprolide 1 Month Depot (Treatment C)300042
Leuprolide Oral Tablet, 10 mg BID (Treatment D)100001212
Leuprolide Oral Tablet, 4 mg BID (Treatment B)322157
Leuprolide Oral Tablet, 4 mg QD (Treatment A)422289

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Excluding Menstrual Disorders

Treatment C is a depot formulation established to release the drug over a period of 1 month. The data for post dosing adverse event was collected starting from day 1 to 28 post the 28th day of dosing. (NCT02807363)
Timeframe: Post dosing period (starting day 1 to day 28 post dosing period)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Number of subjects with at least one TEAENumber of subject who discontinued due to TEAEs
Leuprolide 1 Month Depot(Treatment C)10
Leuprolide Oral Tablet, 10 mg BID (Treatment D)30
Leuprolide Oral Tablet, 4 mg BID (Treatment B)20
Leuprolide Oral Tablet, 4 mg QD (Treatment A)10

[back to top]

Steady State Concentration Level, (Css) of Leuprolide

"Treatment A and B: Steady state concentration level calculated for oral tablets at the end of the fourth treatment week (Treatment Day 28) as the 24-hour AUCs divided by the duration of the dosing interval i.e. 24 hours.~Treatment C: Steady state concentration level calculated for IM injection at the fourth treatment week (a mean of leuprolide levels on Days 22 and 29)." (NCT02807363)
Timeframe: Treatment Day 28 for oral groups; Treatment Days 22-29 for Lupron Depot group

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Leuprolide Oral Tablet, 4 mg QD (Treatment A)357.80
Leuprolide Oral Tablet, 4 mg BID (Treatment B)688.27
Leuprolide 1 Month Depot (Treatment C)180.95

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Experienced Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Excluding Menstrual Disorders

"The participant incidence of TEAEs was generally comparable during the dosing period across the treatment groups.~Treatment C is a depot formulation established to release the drug over a period of 1 month. The data for adverse event was collected for day 1 to 28 of the dosing period." (NCT02807363)
Timeframe: Dosing Period: Day 1 to day 28

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Number of subjects with at least one TEAENumber of subjects who discontinued due to TEAE
Leuprolide 1 Month Depot (Treatment C)40
Leuprolide Oral Tablet, 10 mg BID (Treatment D)80
Leuprolide Oral Tablet, 4 mg BID (Treatment B)91
Leuprolide Oral Tablet, 4 mg QD (Treatment A)70

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adequacy of Suppression of Estradiol (E2) as Assessed by Estradiol Level Below 40 pg/mL

"Criterion: E2 level is considered suppressed during the evaluation period if a value below pre-specified threshold was reported at least once during that period.~The days in the row title indicate the evaluation interval." (NCT02807363)
Timeframe: Dosing Period: Day 8 to 28, Post-dosing: Day 1 to day 28 of post dosing period; Day 29 is the post dosing day 1

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Days 8,15, 22, 28 and 29Days 15, 22, 28 and 29Days 22, 28 and 29Days 22 and 29Entire 28-day Dosing Period28-day Post-dosing Period
Leuprolide 1 Month Depot (Treatment C)555555
Leuprolide Oral Tablet, 10 mg BID (Treatment D)121299129
Leuprolide Oral Tablet, 4 mg BID (Treatment B)776686
Leuprolide Oral Tablet, 4 mg QD (Treatment A)654477

[back to top]

Mean Scores for Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaires EPIC-26 at 24-months Post-RP (Part 2)

The QOL will be measured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite 26 (EPIC-26). For part 2, the questionnaires will be administered at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post RP. Resulting domain scores for EPIC-26 (urinary incontinence, urinary obstruction, sexual, bowel, hormonal/vitality) is on a 0-100 scale, with higher values representing a more favorable health-related QOL. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 24-months post-RP

,
Interventionscore on 0-100 scale (Mean)
Urinary IrritativeUrinary IncontinenceBowelSexualHormonal
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)9275953188
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)9376972690

[back to top]

Biochemical Progression Free Survival (bPFS) Rate at 2 Years Post RP [Part 2]

2-year bPFS rate is defined as the probability of biochemical progression free and survival at 2 years from the date of Part 2 randomization, which is estimated using Kaplan Meier methods. The event is considered to be biochemical progression (defined as a confirmed PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL), local, regional, or distant metastatic disease on CT/MRI or bone scan, or receipt of post-operative systemic therapy or radiotherapy for rising PSA, or death from any cause. Participants who are lost to follow-up before the 2-year mark are censored at date of last disease evaluation. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 2 years post RP

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)90
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)80

[back to top]

Biochemical Progression Free Survival (bPFS) Rate at 3 Years Post RP [Part 2]

3-year bPFS rate is defined as the probability of biochemical progression free and survival at 3 years from the date of Part 2 randomization, which is estimated using Kaplan Meier methods. The event is considered to be biochemical progression (defined as a confirmed PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL), local, regional, or distant metastatic disease on CT/MRI or bone scan, or receipt of post-operative systemic therapy or radiotherapy for rising PSA, or death from any cause. Participants who are lost to follow-up before the 3-year mark are censored at date last disease evaluation. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 3 years post RP

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)81
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)72

[back to top]

Frequency of Presenting Intra-operative Complications Following RP (Part 1)

Intra-operative complications were collected via questionnaire following Radical Prostatectomy. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: Assessed post-RP, at 6 months from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1A: AAPL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)1
Arm 1B: APL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)1

[back to top]

Frequency of Presenting Intraductal Carcinoma at RP (Part 1)

Intraductal carcinoma was evaluated by central pathology review of specimens at Radical Prostatectomy (RP). (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: Assessed from RP specimens, at 6 months from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1A: AAPL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)15
Arm 1B: APL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)19

[back to top]

Median of Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) at RP (Part 1)

"RCB was calculated as tumor volume (cm^3) X % cellularity. RCB was analyzed as a continuous score (with median and range) instead of a categorical variable based on the percentile cutoff point, at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP)." (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: Assessed from RP specimens, at 6 months from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy.

Intervention(cm^3) * % (Median)
Arm 1A: AAPL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)0.023
Arm 1B: APL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)0.075

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Nadir PSA < 0.2 ng/mL Prior to RP (Part 1)

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) was measured on day 1 of each cycle during the neoadjuvant therapy. PSA nadir was defined as the lowest PSA value prior to Radical Prostatectomy (RP). Number and percent of participants with nadir PSA < 0.2 ng/mL were reported. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: Assessed on day 1 of each cycle (1 cycle=28 +/- 2 days), up to 6 months from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1A: AAPL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)55
Arm 1B: APL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)58

[back to top]

Rate of Freedom From Further Anti-cancer Therapy at 2-years Post RP (Part 2)

Defined as the probability of freedom from further anti-cancer therapy at 2-years from the date of Part 2 randomization, which is estimated using Kaplan Meier methods. The event includes initiation of anti-cancer therapy (radiation therapy, ADT, or other therapies) for rising PSAs and/or clinical progression. Participants who are lost to follow-up before the 2-year mark are censored at date of last follow-up. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 2-years post RP

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)90
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)80

[back to top]

Rate of Freedom From Further Anti-cancer Therapy at 3-years Post RP (Part 2)

Defined as the probability of freedom from further anti-cancer therapy at 3-years from the date of Part 2 randomization, which is estimated using Kaplan Meier methods. The event includes initiation of anti-cancer therapy (radiation therapy, ADT, or other therapies) for rising PSAs and/or clinical progression. Participants who are lost to follow-up before the 3-year mark are censored at date of last follow-up. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 3 years post RP

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)83
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)72

[back to top]

Rate of Freedom From Further Anti-cancer Therapy at 4-years Post RP (Part 2)

Defined as the probability of freedom from further anti-cancer therapy at 4-years from the date of Part 2 randomization, which is estimated using Kaplan Meier methods. The event includes initiation of anti-cancer therapy (radiation therapy, ADT, or other therapies) for rising PSAs and/or clinical progression. Participants who are lost to follow-up before the 4-year mark are censored at date of last follow-up. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 4-years post RP

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)78
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)67

[back to top]

Rate of pCR at RP (Part 1)

Pathological Complete Response (pCR) is defined as the absence of morphologically identifiable carcinoma in the RP specimen at radical prostatectomy (RP). (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: Assessed from RP specimens, at 6 months from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1A: AAPL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)7
Arm 1B: APL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)6

[back to top]

Mean Scores for Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaires EPIC-26 at 12-months Post-RP (Part 2)

The QOL will be measured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite 26 (EPIC-26). For part 2, the questionnaires will be administered at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post RP. Resulting domain scores for EPIC-26 (urinary incontinence, urinary obstruction, sexual, bowel, hormonal/vitality) is on a 0-100 scale, with higher values representing a more favorable health-related QOL. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 12-months post-RP

,
Interventionscore on 0-100 scale (Mean)
Urinary IrritativeUrinary IncontinenceBowelSexualHormonal
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)9175951668
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)9174942686

[back to top]

Mean Scores for Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaires EPIC-26 at 6-months Post-RP (Part 2)

The QOL will be measured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite 26 (EPIC-26). For part 2, the questionnaires will be administered at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post RP. Resulting domain scores for EPIC-26 (urinary incontinence, urinary obstruction, sexual, bowel, hormonal/vitality) is on a 0-100 scale, with higher values representing a more favorable health-related QOL. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 6-months post-RP

,
InterventionScore on 0-100 (Mean)
Urinary IrritativeUrinary IncontinenceBowelSexualHormonal
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)9063951768
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)9272961483

[back to top]

Frequency of Presenting Cribriform at RP (Part 1)

Presence or cribriform was evaluated by central pathology review of specimens at radical prostatectomy (RP). (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: Assessed from RP specimens, at 6 months from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1A: AAPL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)1
Arm 1B: APL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)0

[back to top]

Frequency of Positive Surgical Margins at RP (Part 1)

Pathologic specimens were centrally reviewed and counted for positive surgical margins at the time of Radical Prostatectomy (RP). (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: Assessed from RP specimens, at 6 months from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1A: AAPL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)4
Arm 1B: APL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)7

[back to top]

Combined pCR or MRD Rate [Part 1]

Pathological response, defined as achieving either pCR or MRD at radical prostatectomy (RP). Pathological Complete Response (pCR) is defined as the absence of morphologically identifiable carcinoma in the RP specimen. MRD will be defined as residual tumor in the RP specimen measuring ≤ 5 mm. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: Assessed from RP specimens, at 6 months from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1A: AAPL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)12
Arm 1B: APL Neoadjuvant Therapy (Part 1)12

[back to top]

Biochemical Progression Free Survival (bPFS) Rate at 4 Years Post RP [Part 2]

4-year bPFS rate is defined as the probability of biochemical progression free and survival at 4 years from the date of Part 2 randomization, which is estimated using Kaplan Meier methods. The event is considered to be biochemical progression (defined as a confirmed PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL), local, regional, or distant metastatic disease on CT/MRI or bone scan, or receipt of post-operative systemic therapy or radiotherapy for rising PSA, or death from any cause. Participants who are lost to follow-up before the 4-year mark are censored at date of last disease evaluation. (NCT02903368)
Timeframe: At 4 years post RP

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Arm 2A: AAPL Adjuvant Therapy (Part 2)67
Arm 2B: Observation (Part 2)61

[back to top]

Canadian Sub-study: Proteomic Analysis of Ribociclib and Letrozole Cohort Not Achieving Clinical Benefit Compared to a Cohort Sensitive to Treatment With Ribociclib and Letrozole

Exploratory analysis performed in archival tumor samples collected during screening in the main study. Protein expression levels of the ribociclib plus letrozole cohort that did not achieve clinical benefit (progression within 3 months of treatment) and the cohort sensitive to ribociclib and letrozole (cohort with a time to progression of 22 months or more) were determined using using Single-Pot, Solid-Phase-enhanced, Sample Preparation-Clinical Tissue Proteomics (SP3-CTP). For normalization purposes a pooled internal standard sample, comprised of aliquots of every sample included in the study, was included in each experimental batch. Protein abundances were calculated as the log2 transformed abundances relative to the pooled internal standard. Positive values represent higher protein expression levels compared to the pooled internal standard. Expression levels of proteins that showed association to predicting response to study treatment are presented. (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: Screening (up to 28 days before first dose of study treatment)

,
Interventionlog2 transformed relative ratio (Mean)
Isocitrate dehydrogenase [NADP] cytoplasmic (IDH1)Retinal dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1A1)Coagulation factor XIII A chain (F13A1)Argininosuccinate synthase (ASS1)Heat shock protein beta-1 (HSPB1)Aldehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial (ALDH2)Decorin (DCN)Cathepsin G (CTSG)Pyruvate carboxylase, mitochondrial (PC)C-1-tetrahydrofolate synthase, cytoplasmic (MTHFD1)Collagen alpha-3(VI) chain (COL6A3)Versican core protein (VCAN)Fibulin-1 (FBLN1)Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase, mitochondrial (ACAT1)Long-chain-fatty-acid--CoA ligase 1 (ACSL1)Pigment epithelium-derived factor (SERPINF1)3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, mitochondrial (ACAA2)Fatty acid synthase (FASN)Lumican (LUM)Fibulin-2 (FBLN2)Prolow-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1)Galectin-3-binding protein (LGALS3BP)Inactive tyrosine-protein kinase 7 (PTK7)Ras GTPase-activating-like protein IQGAP2 (IQGAP2)Spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 (SPTAN1)Periostin (POSTN)Procollagen C-endopeptidase enhancer 1 (PCOLCE)CD109 antigen (CD109)Palladin (PALLD)Collagen triple helix repeat-containing protein 1 (CTHRC1)Collagen alpha-1(XII) chain (COL12A1)Matrix-remodeling-associated protein 5 (MXRA5)C-type mannose receptor 2 (MRC2)
Primary Resistance Cohort0.1120.022-0.3780.104-0.5460.319-0.456-0.6340.4130.033-0.186-0.301-0.2450.1350.296-0.3780.258-0.198-0.355-0.208-0.148-0.491-0.2510.3180.085-0.419-0.217-0.213-0.207-0.514-0.302-0.221-0.201
Sensitive Cohort-0.218-0.325-0.010-0.466-0.151-0.077-0.033-0.175-0.004-0.129-0.0150.1410.128-0.074-0.1440.169-0.0800.0380.0100.0750.094-0.1260.070-0.036-0.0820.0510.1840.0430.0500.1760.2300.2050.170

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Based on Investigator's Assessment (Core Phase)

"Clinical benefit rate (CBR) is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR), or partial response (PR) or an overall lesion response of stable disease (SD), lasting as per local review, for a duration of at least 24 weeks. CR, PR and SD are defined according to RECIST 1.1 based on investigator's assessment.~CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.~SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease.~95% CI was calculated using the exact binomial method." (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide70.7

[back to top]

Time-to-Progression (TTP) Based on Investigator's Assessment (Core Phase)

"Time to progression (TTP) is defined as time from date of start of treatment to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. Participants with symptoms of rapidly progressing disease without radiologic evidence were classified as progression only when clear evidence of clinical deterioration was documented and/or patient discontinued due to 'Disease progression' or death due to study indication. When there was no documentation of radiologic evidence of progression, and the patient discontinued for 'Disease progression' due to documented clinical deterioration of disease, the date of discontinuation was used as date of progression.~TTP was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 95% CI of median was calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley method." (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide27.1

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) Based on Investigator's Assessment (Core Phase)

"Overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1 based on investigator's assessment.~CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.~95% CI was calculated using the exact binomial method." (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide29.3

[back to top]

All Collected Deaths

"On-treatment- Core phase: from first treatment in the Core phase up to 30 days post-treatment (for participants who did not enter the Extension phase) or up to last treatment in the Core phase (for participants who entered the Extension phase). Extension phase: from first dose of treatment in the Extension phase up to 30 days after last dose of treatment.~Post-treatment survival follow-up- Core phase: from 31 days post-treatment in the core phase up to end of study; Extension phase: from 31 days post-treatment in the Extension phase up to end of study." (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: On-treatment Core Phase: up to 33 months; Post-treatment survival Follow-up Core Phase: Up to 33 months; On-treatment Extension Phase: up to approximately 37.6 months; Post-treatment survival Follow-up Extension Phase: Up to approximately 37.6 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
On-treatment Core PhasePost-treatment survival follow-up Core PhaseAll deaths Core PhaseOn-treatment Extension PhasePost-treatment survival follow-up Extension PhaseAll deaths Extension Phase
Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide7490164538

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) Score (Core Phase)

"Change from baseline in FACT-B scores was assessed. FACT-B is a self-report instrument that measures multidimensional quality of life (QOL) in patients with breast cancer. The FACT-B consists of 37 questions that address physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, with specific questions relevant to women with breast cancer. Each item has a score range of 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much), with a total score ranging from 0-148. The higher the score, the better the QOL reported by the participant. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in QoL.~Due to the nature of the questionnaire, only females were asked to complete this questionnaire." (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: On Day 1 of Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4 ,5, 6, 8, 10, 12 and after that every 3 cycles, and End of treatment, assessed up to 33 months. Cycle=28 days

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 6 Day 1Cycle 8 Day 1Cycle 10 Day 1Cycle 12 Day 1Cycle 15 Day 1Cycle 18 Day 1Cycle 21 Day 1Cycle 24 Day 1Cycle 27 Day 1Cycle 30 Day 1Cycle 33 Day 1End of Treatment
Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide0.20.1-0.30.0-0.8-0.9-1.2-1.6-2.0-2.0-2.0-3.0-2.7-2.012.1-4.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) During Treatment With Ribociclib + Letrozole in the Core Phase

"AEs were defined as the appearance of (or worsening of any pre-existing) undesirable sign(s), symptom(s), or medical condition(s).~SAEs were defined as meeting at least 1 of the following criteria: is fatal or life-threatening, Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically significant, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. A SAE which caused death of the participant was considered as fatal SAE.~AEs were assessed and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1 to 5 were used to characterize the severity of the Adverse Event. Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening and Grade 5: death related to AE.~A participant with multiple severity grades for an AE is only counted under the maximum grade." (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: From start of treatment up to 30 days after last treatment (for participants who did not enter to the Extension phase) or up to last treatment in the Core phase (for participants who entered the Extension phase), assessed up to approximately 33 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AEs- All gradesAEs- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs- All gradesTreatment-related AEs- Grade ≥ 3SAEs- All gradesSAEs- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related SAEs- All gradesTreatment-related SAEs- Grade ≥ 3Fatal SAEs- All gradesTreatment-related Fatal SAEs- All gradesAEs leading to discontinuation- All gradesAEs leading to discontinuation- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation- All gradesTreatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation-Grade ≥ 3AEs leading to dose adjustment/interruption- All gradesAEs leading to dose adjustment/interruption- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs leading to dose adjustment/interruption- All gradesTreatment-related AEs leading to dose adjustment/interruption- Grade ≥ 3AEs requiring additional therapy- All gradesAEs requiring additional therapy- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs requiring additional therapy- All gradesTreatment-related AEs requiring additional therapy- Grade ≥ 3
Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide32032461309121927025902031786214528310418237243420952235196426248441613392

[back to top]

Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs in the Extension Phase

"AEs were defined as the appearance of (or worsening of any pre-existing) undesirable sign(s), symptom(s), or medical condition(s).~SAEs were defined as meeting at least 1 of the following criteria: is fatal or life-threatening, Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically significant, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization.~AEs were assessed and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1 to 5 were used to characterize the severity of the Adverse Event. Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening and Grade 5: death related to AE.~A participant with multiple severity grades for an AE is only counted under the maximum grade." (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: From first dose of treatment in the Extension phase up to 30 days after last dose of treatment, assessed up approximately 37.6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AEs- All gradesAEs- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs- All gradesTreatment-related AEs- Grade ≥ 3SAEs- All gradesSAEs- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related SAEs- All gradesTreatment-related SAEs- Grade ≥ 3Fatal SAEs- All gradesTreatment-related Fatal SAEs- All gradesAEs leading to discontinuation- All gradesAEs leading to discontinuation- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation- All gradesTreatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation-Grade ≥ 3AEs leading to dose adjustment/interruption- All gradesAEs leading to dose adjustment/interruption- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs leading to dose adjustment/interruption- All gradesTreatment-related AEs leading to dose adjustment/interruption- Grade ≥ 3AEs requiring additional therapy- All gradesAEs requiring additional therapy- Grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs requiring additional therapy- All gradesTreatment-related AEs requiring additional therapy- Grade ≥ 3
Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide2971592211235445765017974185132134113186564712

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Extension Phase)

Clinical benefit as assessed by the Investigator during Extension phase (NCT02941926)
Timeframe: On Day 1 of every 3 cycles, starting from Cycle 1 of the Extension phase until end of treatment, assessed up to 37.4 months. Cycle= 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 7 Day 1Cycle 10 Day 1Cycle 13 Day 1Cycle 16 Day 1Cycle 19 Day 1Cycle 22 Day 1Cycle 25 Day 1Cycle 28 Day 1Cycle 31 Day 1Cycle 34 Day 1Cycle 37 Day 1Cycle 40 Day 1
Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide41338635332324520018311855514432245

[back to top]

Change in PGRMC1 During Menstrual Cycle

"Measuring the mean transcript change of membrane bound progestin receptors (PGRMC1) from follicular phase to ovulation to luteal phase of spontaneous menstrual cycle.~Total RNA (ribonucleic acid) was isolated from endocervical cell samples and analyzed for expression of PGRMC1 using real-time PCR (polymerase chain reaction) relative to levels of ribosomal (S10) RNA. An endocervical brush will be inserted into the os and then immediately rinsed into a special RNA preserving reagent. After total RNA is isolated and purified, it will be reverse transcribed into cDNA using primers.~Ratio of PGRMC1 to 18s RNA~Gene expression of membrane bound progesterone receptors in endocervical cells" (NCT02969590)
Timeframe: 1 month

Interventionratio (Mean)
Follicular PhaseOvulation PhaseLuteal Phase
Spontaneous Cycle1.24.01.02

[back to top]

Median Cervical Mucus Score - Baseline

"Measurement of median cervical mucus scores at baseline. The current clinical standard for appraising cervical mucus is the cervical mucus score (ie. Insler score) that examines mucus based on 5 metrics including volume, spinnbarkeit (stretch), ferning, viscosity and cellularity on a 15-point scale. Per WHO guidelines, scores above 10 are considered mucus favoring penetration and scores below 10 are considered to be unfavorable to penetration." (NCT02969590)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Norethindrone11
Estradiol13

[back to top]

Median Cervical Mucus Score - 6 Hour

"Measurement of median cervical mucus scores 6 hours following norethindrone administration. The current clinical standard for appraising cervical mucus is the cervical mucus score (ie. Insler score) that examines mucus based on 5 metrics including volume, spinnbarkeit (stretch), ferning, viscosity and cellularity on a 15-point scale. Per WHO guidelines, scores above 10 are considered mucus favoring penetration and scores below 10 are considered to be unfavorable to penetration." (NCT02969590)
Timeframe: 6 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Norethindrone6.5
Estradiol8.5

[back to top]

Median Cervical Mucus Score - 24 Hour

"Measurement of median cervical mucus scores 24 hours following norethindrone administration. The current clinical standard for appraising cervical mucus is the cervical mucus score (ie. Insler score) that examines mucus based on 5 metrics including volume, spinnbarkeit (stretch), ferning, viscosity and cellularity on a 15-point scale. Per WHO guidelines, scores above 10 are considered mucus favoring penetration and scores below 10 are considered to be unfavorable to penetration." (NCT02969590)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Norethindrone8
Estradiol10.5

[back to top]

Median Cervical Mucus Score - 2 Hour

"Measurement of median cervical mucus scores 2 hours following norethindrone administration. The current clinical standard for appraising cervical mucus is the cervical mucus score (ie. Insler score) that examines mucus based on 5 metrics including volume, spinnbarkeit (stretch), ferning, viscosity and cellularity on a 15-point scale. Per WHO guidelines, scores above 10 are considered mucus favoring penetration and scores below 10 are considered to be unfavorable to penetration." (NCT02969590)
Timeframe: 2 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Norethindrone8.5
Estradiol10.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Had Regression or No Progression in Tanner Staging at the End of Follow-Up Phase

Tanner Stage is used to measure pubertal development. Female (F) and male (M) participants were evaluated for breast development and genital development respectively and both genders for pubic hair development. Tanner Stage is based on progression through 5-stages. Participants were classified as having progression if either breast/genitals or pubic hair progression were present. Otherwise participant is classified as regression or no progression. (NCT02993926)
Timeframe: No longer treated for CPP group - Month: 27 (766- 855 days) post last dose of Enantone; Treated with Non-Enantone GnRHa group - Month 21 (586- 675 days) post last dose of Enantone

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
FollowUp:Treated With Non-Enantone GnRHa After Enantone-Female0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Decease of Ratio of Bone Age to Chronological Age at the End of Enantone Treatment Phase

Bone age (BA) was estimated using an X-ray. Chronological age (CA) at the date of corresponding X-ray (Date of X-ray - Date of birth)/365.25. Ratio of BA/CA was calculated. (NCT02993926)
Timeframe: The mean duration of Enantone exposure was 22.3 months, ranging from 10.1 to 52.4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment Phase: Enantone (Male)75.0
Treatment Phase: Enantone (Female)90.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Decease of Ratio of Bone Age to Chronological Age at the End of Follow-up Phase

Bone age (BA) was estimated using an X-ray. Chronological age (CA) at the date of corresponding X-ray (Date of X-ray - Date of birth)/365.25. Ratio of BA/CA was calculated. (NCT02993926)
Timeframe: No longer treated for CPP group - Month: 27 (766- 855 days) post last dose of Enantone; Treated with Non-Enantone GnRHa group - Month 18 (496-585 days) post last dose of Enantone

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Follow Up: Participants No Longer Treated for CPP (Female)100
FollowUp:Treated With Non-Enantone GnRHa After Enantone-Female100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Value, for Estradiol or Testosterone, Suppressed Below Upper Limit Value (ULV) at the End of Enantone Treatment Phase

Estradiol or Testosterone, suppressed below Upper Limit Value (ULV) were reported. The ULV for estradiol and testosterone were 20 pg/mL and 7.34 nmol/L, respectively. (NCT02993926)
Timeframe: The mean duration of Enantone exposure was 22.3 months, ranging from 10.1 to 52.4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment Phase: Enantone (Male)100
Treatment Phase: Enantone (Female)74.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Value, for Estradiol or Testosterone, Suppressed Below Upper Limit Value (ULV) at the End of Follow-Up Phase

Estradiol or Testosterone, suppressed below Upper Limit Value (ULV) were reported. The ULV for estradiol and testosterone were 20 pg/mL and 7.34 nmol/L, respectively. (NCT02993926)
Timeframe: No longer treated for CPP group-Month: 27 (766-855 days) post last dose of Enantone; Treated with Non-Enantone GnRHa group-Month 21 (586-675 days) post last dose of Enantone

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Follow Up: Participants No Longer Treated for CPP (Female)0
FollowUp:Treated With Non-Enantone GnRHa After Enantone-Female0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During Follow-up Phase

A TEAE is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. (NCT02993926)
Timeframe: Mean duration of follow-up=8.75 months (range: 1.9-29.5 months) for No longer treated for CPP group; 10.80 months (range: 2.8-20.5 months) for Treated with Non-Enantone GnRHa group after treatment with Enantone (while on another GnRHa)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAESAE
Follow Up: Participants No Longer Treated for CPP (Female)100
Follow UP: Participants No Longer Treated for CPP (Male)00
FollowUp:Treated With Non-Enantone GnRHa After Enantone-Female90

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During Enantone Treatment Phase

A TEAE is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. (NCT02993926)
Timeframe: During treatment with and up to 30 days post last dose of Enantone (the mean duration of Enantone exposure was 22.3 months, ranging from 10.1 to 52.4 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAESAE
Treatment Phase: Enantone (Female)712
Treatment Phase: Enantone (Male)40

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Had Regression or No Progression in Tanner Staging at the End of Enantone Treatment Phase

Tanner Stage is used to measure pubertal development. Female (F) and male (M) participants were evaluated for breast development and genital development respectively and both genders for pubic hair development. Tanner Stage is based on progression through 5-stages. Participants were classified as having progression if either breast/genitals or pubic hair progression were present. Otherwise participant is classified as regression or no progression. (NCT02993926)
Timeframe: The mean duration of Enantone exposure was 22.3 months, ranging from 10.1 to 52.4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment Phase: Enantone (Male)0
Treatment Phase: Enantone (Female)79.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Post Stimulation Test Peak Values, for Luteinizing Hormone (LH) and Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH), Suppressed Below Upper Limit Value (ULV) at the End of Enantone Treatment Phase

The LH suppression is defined as peak LH ≤2 U/L for female and peak LH ≤2.7 U/L for male. The FSH suppression is defined as peak FSH ≤6.7 U/L for female and peak FSH ≤3.7 U/L for male. Post Stimulation Test, the peak values for LH and FSH suppression below Upper Limit Value (ULV) are reported. (NCT02993926)
Timeframe: The mean duration of Enantone exposure was 22.3 months, ranging from 10.1 to 52.4 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
LH (U/L) Peak Value ≤ ULVFSH (U/L) Peak Value ≤ ULV
Treatment Phase: Enantone (Female)98.1100
Treatment Phase: Enantone (Male)100100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Testosterone Levels Less Than (<) 20, 20-50 and Greater Than (>) 50 Nanogram Per Deciliter (ng/dL) at Month 12

Testosterone level was summarized based on the percentage of participants with < 20 ng/dL, 20 to 50 ng/dL and > 50 ng/dL. (NCT03035032)
Timeframe: Month 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
< 20 ng/dL20 - 50 ng/dL> 50 ng/dL
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg51.412.41.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Health Status Utility Index Score (US) at Months 6, 12 and 18

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome and provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. EQ-5D-5L is designed for self-completion by respondents and consists of 2 pages comprising the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension of the EQ-5D-5L has 5 levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems) and the participants was asked to indicate his health state by ticking the box with the most appropriate statement. Index scores were generated using US value sets. Scores ranged from -0.109 to 1. Higher scores indicate better health state. (NCT03035032)
Timeframe: Baseline, months 6, 12 and 18

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Month 6Month 9Month 18
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg0.0017-0.0047-0.0191

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D02-EQ-VAS Score at Months 6, 12 and 18

The EQ5D02-EQ-VAS is a vertical VAS with values between 0 (worst imaginable health) and 100 (best imaginable health), on which participants provide a global assessment of their health. Higher score indicate better health state. (NCT03035032)
Timeframe: Baseline, months 6, 12 and 18

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Month 6Month 9Month 18
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg1.32.12.0

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥50% PSA Percent Reduction From Baseline at Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18

"PSA percent reduction (%) = ([PSA tested- baseline PSA]/baseline PSA)*100%. PSA level was summarized based on time to PSA progression and PSA percent reduction by ≥ 50% with respect to the level at baseline. Participants with more than 1 qualifying PSA progression were counted only once, and the earlier progression was accounted for time to progression analysis.~PSA progression was defined as 25% or greater increase and an absolute increase of 2 ng/mL, and confirmed by a second value at least 3 weeks later." (NCT03035032)
Timeframe: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12Month 15Month 18
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg89.291.791.694.296.988.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥90% PSA Percent Reduction From Baseline at Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18

"PSA percent reduction (%) = ([PSA tested- baseline PSA]/baseline PSA)*100%. PSA level was summarized based on time to PSA progression and PSA percent reduction by ≥ 90%, with respect to the level at baseline. Participants with more than 1 qualifying PSA progression were counted only once, and the earlier progression was accounted for time to progression analysis.~PSA progression was defined as 25% or greater increase and an absolute increase of 2 ng/mL, and confirmed by a second value at least 3 weeks later." (NCT03035032)
Timeframe: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12Month 15Month 18
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg69.677.177.181.279.768.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 30% PSA Percent Reduction From Baseline at Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18

"PSA percent reduction (%) = ([PSA tested- baseline PSA]/baseline PSA)*100%. PSA level was summarized based on time to PSA progression and PSA percent reduction by ≥ 30% with respect to the level at baseline. Participants with more than 1 qualifying PSA progression were counted only once, and the earlier progression was accounted for time to progression analysis.~PSA progression was defined as 25% or greater increase and an absolute increase of 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL), and confirmed by a second value at least 3 weeks later." (NCT03035032)
Timeframe: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12Month 15Month 18
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg96.193.892.897.198.491.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Testosterone Levels < 20, 20-50 and > 50 ng/dL at Month 18

Testosterone level was summarized based on the percentage of participants with < 20 ng/dL, 20 to 50 ng/dL and > 50 ng/dL. (NCT03035032)
Timeframe: Month 18

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
< 20 ng/dL20 - 50 ng/dL> 50 ng/dL
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg61.916.21.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Health Status Utility Index Score (UK) at Months 6, 12 and 18

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome and provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. EQ-5D-5L is designed for self-completion by respondents and consists of 2 pages comprising the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension of the EQ-5D-5L has 5 levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems) and the participant was asked to indicate his health state by ticking the box with the most appropriate statement. Index scores were generated using UK value sets. Scores ranged from -0.594 to 1. Higher scores indicate better health state. (NCT03035032)
Timeframe: Baseline, months 6, 12 and 18

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Month 6Month 9Month 18
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg0.0055-0.0051-0.0259

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Health State Utility Index Score (Japan) at Months 6, 12 and 18

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome and provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. EQ-5D-5L is designed for self-completion by respondents and consists of 2 pages comprising the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension of the EQ-5D-5L has 5 levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems) and the participant was asked to indicate his health state by ticking the box with the most appropriate statement. Index scores were generated using Japan value sets. Scores ranged from -0.111 to 1. Higher scores indicate better health state. (NCT03035032)
Timeframe: Baseline, months 6, 12 and 18

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Month 6Month 12Month 18
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg-0.0047-0.0093-0.0262

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-PR25 Score at Months 6, 12 and 18

EORTC QLQ-PR25 is a prostate cancer module for the assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). EORTC QLQ-PR25 is designed for self-completion by respondents and assesses urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, treatment-related symptoms and sexual activity and functioning. The rule of scoring for EORTC QLQ-PR25 follows instruction of EORTC QLQ-PR25 Scoring Manual 2.0. It consist of 25 questions distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'). All raw domain scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores reflecting either more symptoms (urinary, bowel, hormonal treatment-related symptoms) or higher levels of activity or functioning (sexual). (NCT03035032)
Timeframe: Baseline, months 6, 12 and 18

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Week 6: Urinary SymptomsWeek 6: Incontinence AidWeek 6: Bowel SymptomsWeek 6: HTRSWeek 6: Sexually ActiveWeek 6: Sexual FunctionWeek 12: Urinary SymptomsWeek 12: Incontinence AidWeek 12: Bowel SymptomsWeek 12: HTRSWeek 12: Sexually ActiveWeek 12: Sexual FunctionWeek 18: Urinary SymptomsWeek 18: Incontinence AidWeek 18: Bowel SymptomsWeek 18: HTRSWeek 18: Sexually ActiveWeek 18: Sexual Function
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg-4.84-5.21-2.173.27-6.08-1.44-6.93-11.11-2.662.14-5.07-2.99-4.061.670.314.68-3.54-8.52

[back to top]

Time to PSA Progression

Time to PSA progression was defined as (date of ≥25 percentage (%) increase and ≥ 2 ng/mL absolute increase) - (date of first administration of ELIGARD 22.5 mg)/30, where PSA progression was defiined as 25% or greater increase and an absolute increase of 2 ng/mL, and confirmed by a second value at least 3 weeks later. Participants with more than 1 qualifying PSA progression were counted only once, and the earlier progression was accounted for time to progression analysis. (NCT03035032)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to PSA progression (18 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg8.80

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Recurrence

To investigate the time from an undetectable Prostate-specific antigen (≤0.2 ng/mL) until the Prostate-specific antigen is >0.2 over two time-points. (NCT03043807)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionMonth (Median)
Chemohormonal and Definitive Therapy After ProstatectomyNA

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline In Serum Concentrations Of Dihydrotestosterone

Blood samples were collected from participants for hormonal measurements. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Week 5 Day 1 (Day 29), Week 25 Day 1 (Day 169), and Week 49 Day 1 (Day 337)

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Week 5 Day 1 (Day 29)Week 25 Day 1 (Day 169)Week 49 Day 1 (Day 337)
Leuprolide Acetate-81.95-85.45-87.56
Relugolix-87.61-88.06-88.23

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In QoL Total Score For Urinary And Bowel Symptoms Domains As Assessed By The EORTC-QLQ-PR25

Subscale assessments of urinary symptoms (9 items) and bowel symptoms (4 items) from the EORTC-QLQ-PR25 25-item prostate cancer module of the EORTC are presented. Questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'). All raw domain scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. A decrease in symptom scores indicates improvement (lower level of symptoms/problems). (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 49 Day 1 (Day 337)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Urinary symptomsIncontinence aid useBowel symptoms
Leuprolide Acetate-0.40.02.0
Relugolix1.11.01.2

[back to top]

Profound Castration Rate At Week 1 Day 4 (Day 4)

Castration rate defined as the cumulative probability of testosterone suppression to < 20 ng/dL. The rate was estimated for each treatment group using the Kaplan-Meier method and reported as percentage of participants. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: At Week 1 Day 4 (Day 4)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix6.92
Leuprolide Acetate0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In QoL Total Score For Remaining Domain Scores As Assessed By The EORTC-QLQ-C30

The EORTC QLQ-C30 core measurement was used to capture distal outcomes, including physical, social functioning, and overall health-related quality of life. The questionnaire incorporates 30 questions comprising nine multi-item scales: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting); and a global health and quality of life scale. All raw domain scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. All domains except for the global health and quality are presented. An increase in activity or functioning scores indicates improvement (higher/healthier level of functioning) and a decrease in symptom scores indicates improvement (lower level of symptoms/problems). (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 49 Day 1 (Day 337)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Physical functioningRole functioningEmotional functioningCognitive functioningSocial functioningFatigueNausea and vomitingPainDyspnoeaInsomniaAppetite lossConstipationDiarrhoeaFinancial difficulties
Leuprolide Acetate-4.4-5.6-0.5-3.8-4.07.00.84.07.94.8-0.63.51.40.1
Relugolix-4.6-6.20.5-3.7-2.76.10.21.75.34.8-0.61.42.00.2

[back to top] [back to top]

Undetectable PSA Rate

Defined as the proportion of participants with PSA concentration < 0.02 ng/milliliter (mL).The rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and reported as percentage of participants. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Week 25 Day 1 (Day 169)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix20.7
Leuprolide Acetate20.8

[back to top]

Time To Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) Of Relugolix

The Tmax of relugolix was determined for single and repeat doses in subsets of participants from Japan. Single dose PK was assessed on Day 1 following an initial 360 mg dose of relugolix. Repeat dose PK was assessed following repeat dosing of relugolix 120 mg once daily for 2 weeks. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Week 2

Interventionhours (Median)
Relugolix Single-Dose1.03
Relugolix Repeat-Dose0.983

[back to top]

Sustained Profound Castration Rate From Week 5 Day 1 Through Week 49 Day 1

Sustained profound castration rate was defined as the cumulative probability of testosterone suppression to < 20 ng/dL. The rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and reported as percentage of participants. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Week 5 Day 1 (Day 29) through Week 49 Day 1 (Day 337)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix81.6
Leuprolide Acetate68.6

[back to top]

Sustained Profound Castration Rate From Week 25 Day 1 Through Week 49 Day 1

Sustained profound castration rate was defined as the cumulative probability of testosterone suppression to < 20 ng/dL. The rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and reported as percentage of participants. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Week 25 Day 1 (Day 169) through Week 49 Day 1 (Day 337)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix84.6
Leuprolide Acetate87.5

[back to top]

Sustained Castration Rate

"Sustained castration rate defined as the cumulative probability of testosterone suppression to < 50 nanogram (ng)/deciliter (dL). The rate was estimated for each treatment group using the Kaplan-Meier method and reported as percentage of participants.~The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the cumulative probability of sustained testosterone suppression in the relugolix treatment group must have been ≥ 90% to meet evaluation criteria for efficacy." (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: From Week 5 Day 1 (Day 29) to Week 49 Day 1 (Day 337)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix96.7
Leuprolide Acetate88.8

[back to top]

Rate Of PSA Progression-free Survival

PSA progression was defined as the first increase in PSA of 25% or greater and 2 ng/mL or greater above the nadir with confirmation by a second consecutive PSA measurement at least 3 weeks later. For participants without declining PSA from baseline, a PSA increase of ≥ 25% and ≥ 2 ng/mL from baseline beyond 12 weeks was considered PSA progression. The rate of progression-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and reported as percentage of participants. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Week 49 Day 1 (Day 337)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix89.31
Leuprolide Acetate89.50

[back to top]

PSA Response Rate At Week 5 Day 1

PSA response defined as > 50% reduction in PSA from baseline. The rate was estimated for each treatment group using the Kaplan-Meier method and reported as percentage of participants. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Week 5 Day 1 (Day 29)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix94.5
Leuprolide Acetate79.2

[back to top]

PSA Response Rate At Week 3 Day 1

PSA response defined as > 50% reduction in PSA from baseline. The rate was estimated for each treatment group using the Kaplan-Meier method and reported as percentage of participants. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Week 3 Day 1 (Day 15)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix80.1
Leuprolide Acetate20.1

[back to top]

Profound Castration Rate At Week 3 Day 1 (Day 15)

Castration rate defined as the cumulative probability of testosterone suppression to < 20 ng/dL. The rate was estimated for each treatment group using the Kaplan-Meier method and reported as percentage of participants. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Week 3 Day 1 (Day 15)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix78.38
Leuprolide Acetate0.98

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)

MACE were defined as nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and death from any cause. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: From Week 5 Day 1 (Day 29) to Week 49 Day 1 (Day 337)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix2.9
Leuprolide Acetate6.2

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Of Relugolix

The Cmax of relugolix was determined for single and repeat doses in subsets of participants from Japan. Single dose pharmacokinetics (PK) was assessed on Day 1 following an initial 360 mg dose of relugolix. Repeat dose PK was assessed following repeat dosing of relugolix 120 mg once daily for 2 weeks. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Week 2

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Relugolix Single-Dose125
Relugolix Repeat-Dose46.4

[back to top]

Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH) Level

To evaluate the effect of relugolix and leuprolide acetate on FSH suppression. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Week 25 Day 1 (Day 169)

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Relugolix1.72
Leuprolide Acetate5.95

[back to top]

Confirmed Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate

Confirmed PSA response defined as > 50% reduction in PSA from baseline at Week 3 Day 1 followed with confirmation at Week 5 Day 1. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Week 3 Day 1 (Day 15) and Week 5 Day 1 (Day 29)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix79.4
Leuprolide Acetate19.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In Quality Of Life (QoL) Total Score As Assessed By The Global Health Domain Of The European Organisation Of Research And Treatment Of Cancer (EORTC)-Quality Of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30

The EORTC QLQ-C30 core measurement was used to capture distal outcomes, including physical, social functioning, and overall health-related quality of life. The questionnaire incorporates 30 questions comprising nine multi-item scales: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting); and a global health and quality of life scale. All raw domain scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. The global health and quality of life domain is presented. An increase in activity or functioning scores indicates improvement (higher/healthier level of functioning) and a decrease in symptom scores indicates improvement (lower level of symptoms/problems). (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 49 Day 1 (Day 337)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Relugolix-3.8
Leuprolide Acetate-3.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline In QoL Total Score As Assessed By The European Quality Of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire (EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L)

The EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems (1 as numerical score), slight problems (2 as numerical score), moderate problems (3 as numerical score), severe problems (4 as numerical score), and extreme problems (5 as numerical score). The total score ranges from 0 to 100. A decrease in score indicates improvement. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 49 Day 1 (Day 337)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Relugolix-1.5
Leuprolide Acetate-2.7

[back to top]

Area Under The Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-τ) Of Relugolix

The AUC0-τ of relugolix was determined for single and repeat doses in subsets of participants from Japan. Single dose PK was assessed on Day 1 following an initial 360 mg dose of relugolix. Repeat dose PK was assessed following repeat dosing of relugolix 120 mg once daily for 2 weeks. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Week 2

Interventionng⸳hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Relugolix Single-Dose663
Relugolix Repeat-Dose373

[back to top]

Castration Rate At Week 1 Day 4

Castration rate was defined as the cumulative probability of testosterone suppression to < 50 ng/dL. The rate was estimated for each treatment group using the Kaplan-Meier method and reported as percentage of participants. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Week 1 Day 4 (Day 4)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix56.04
Leuprolide Acetate0.00

[back to top]

Castration Rate At Week 3 Day 1

Castration rate was defined as the cumulative probability of testosterone suppression to < 50 ng/dL. The rate was estimated for each treatment group using the Kaplan-Meier method and reported as percentage of participants. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Week 3 Day 1 (Day 15)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Relugolix98.71
Leuprolide Acetate12.05

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline In Serum Concentrations Of Luteinizing Hormone

Blood samples were collected from participants for hormonal measurements. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Week 1 Day 4 (Day 4), Week 5 Day 1 (Day 29), Week 25 Day 1 (Day 169), and Week 49 Day 1 (Day 337)

,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Week 1 Day 4 (Day 4)Week 5 Day 1 (Day 29)Week 25 Day 1 (Day 169)Week 49 Day 1 (Day 337)
Leuprolide Acetate147.71-82.67-93.45-95.14
Relugolix-88.25-94.54-93.93-91.54

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline In Serum Concentrations Of FSH

Blood samples were collected from participants for hormonal measurements. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Week 1 Day 4 (Day 4), Week 5 Day 1 (Day 29), Week 25 Day 1 (Day 169), and Week 49 Day 1 (Day 337)

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Week 1 Day 4 (Day 4)Week 5 Day 1 (Day 29)Week 25 Day 1 (Day 169)Week 49 Day 1 (Day 337)
Leuprolide Acetate-4.74-67.73-47.53-47.23
Relugolix-62.59-90.80-86.32-79.39

[back to top]

Testosterone Recovery Rate

The cumulative probability of testosterone recovery back to > 280 ng/dL (lower limit of the normal range), back to ≥ 50 ng/dL (definition of castration), and back to > 280 ng/dL or baseline at 90 days after drug discontinuation was assessed. The rate was estimated for each treatment group using the Kaplan-Meier method and reported as percentage of participants. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Day 90 follow-up

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
≥ 50 ng/dL> 280 ng/dL> Baseline level or 280 ng/dL
Leuprolide Acetate10.123.233.23
Relugolix93.0153.9354.73

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline In Serum Concentrations Of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin

Blood samples were collected from participants for hormonal measurements. (NCT03085095)
Timeframe: Week 5 Day 1 (Day 29), Week 25 Day 1 (Day 169), and Week 49 Day 1 (Day 337)

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Week 5 Day 1 (Day 29)Week 25 Day 1 (Day 169)Week 49 Day 1 (Day 337)
Leuprolide Acetate-1.213.592.59
Relugolix1.087.246.54

[back to top]

Maximum Blood Concentration (Cmax) for Docetaxel Pharmacokinetic Analysis

The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of the first 9 patients enrolled at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute will be determined using noncompartmental methods with WinNonLin version 5.2. Maximum blood concentration (Cmax) will be determined by visual inspection. Due to the premature termination of the study, only 9 patients were evaluated. The PK samples were collected on Days 1 and 2 of the first two treatment cycles. (NCT03093272)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, 2: During infusion at pre-dose, 15 minutes and 30 minutes post-dose, end of dose, and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 hours post dose.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Apalutamide Combined With Docetaxel24151641

[back to top]

Serum PSA Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks on Treatment

The maximum percent PSA change (rise or fall) from baseline to after 12 weeks on study. For patients who discontinue on or before the 12 week assessment or for whom the 12 week assessment is missing, the last observation prior to the week 12 assessment will be utilized. Patients with no post-baseline PSA data will be excluded from the summary. (NCT03093272)
Timeframe: PSA was measured on Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline) and at 12 weeks on treatment.

Interventionpercent (Median)
Apalutamide Combined With Docetaxel13.0

[back to top]

To Evaluate Progression-free Survival on the Combination of Docetaxel Plus Apalutamide

"Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from treatment initiation until the occurrence of one of the following:~A participant was considered to have progressed by bone scan if~the first bone scan with greater than or equal to (≥) 2 new lesions compared to baseline was observed in less than (<) 12 weeks from study drug initiation and was confirmed by a second bone scan taken ≥6 weeks later showing ≥2 additional new lesions (a total of ≥4 new lesions compared to baseline);~the first bone scan with ≥2 new lesions compared to baseline was observed in ≥12 weeks from study drug initiation and the new lesions were verified on the next bone scan ≥6 weeks later (a total of ≥2 new lesions compared to baseline);~Progression of soft tissue lesions measured by computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by RECIST v. 1.1; or~Death from any cause." (NCT03093272)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 12 weeks on treatment; PFS follow up was up to 9.4 months

Interventionmonths (Number)
Participant 1Participant 2Participant 3Participant 4Participant 5Participant 6Participant 7Participant 8Participant 9
Apalutamide Combined With Docetaxel5.6NA5.68.11.84.85.1NA9.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time from trial treatment start to death due to any cause, or censored at date last known alive. (NCT03093272)
Timeframe: Measured from end of study treatment to death due to any cause; OS measured as 22.4 months

Interventionmonths (Number)
Participant 1Participant 2Participant 3Participant 4Participant 5Participant 6Participant 7Participant 8Participant 9
Apalutamide Combined With Docetaxel22.44.221.216.81.89.010.15.912.2

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Docetaxel Pharmacokinetic Analysis

The area under the blood concentration-time curve (linear trapezoidal rule) will be determined between 0-24 hours (AUC0-24). The PK samples were collected during the first two days of cycles 1 and 2. (NCT03093272)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, 2: During infusion at pre-dose, 15 minutes and 30 minutes post-dose, end of dose, and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 hours post dose.

Interventionng•h/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Apalutamide Combined With Docetaxel34063095

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Reactions

Adverse drug reaction refers to adverse events related to the administered drug. (NCT03209492)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Leuprorelin Acetate 22.5 mg2.74

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Events

(NCT03209492)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Leuprorelin Acetate 22.5 mg4.27

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Reactions

Adverse drug reaction refers to adverse events related to the administered drug. (NCT03209518)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Leuprorelin Acetate 22.5 mg5.48

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Events

(NCT03209518)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Leuprorelin Acetate 22.5 mg6.45

[back to top]

Efficacy of Leuprolide Mesylate (LMIS 25mg)

The percentage of subjects with a serum testosterone concentration suppressed to castrate levels (≤ 50 ng/dL) from Day 28 through Day 168. (NCT03261999)
Timeframe: 168 days

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Leuprolide Mesylate 25mg97.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Determining the safety and tolerability of LMIS 25 mg based on adverse events (AEs). (NCT03261999)
Timeframe: 168 days

Interventionsubjects (Number)
TEAEDrug-related TEAESAE
Leuprolide Mesylate 25mg90539

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Incremental Growth Rate

Growth rate (height in centimeter/year) was calculated both prior to treatment in the study and during the study. For Baseline calculation a historical measurement of height at least 6 months prior to Screening and the Screening value was used. (NCT03695237)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, 20, 24, 44, and 48

,,
Interventioncm/year (Mean)
Week 4Week 12Week 20Week 24Week 44Week 48
Leuprolide Acetate - Overall-0.8-2.0-2.5-2.4-2.6-2.3
Leuprolide Acetate - Previously Treated-0.6-0.6-0.5-0.5-0.4-0.3
Leuprolide Acetate - Treament Naïve-0.9-2.9-3.8-3.7-4.1-3.5

[back to top]

Part 1: Percentage of Female Participants With Suppression of Basal Estradiol to < 20 pg/mL at Weeks 12, 20, 24, 44, and 48

Estradiol concentrations were measured from blood samples taken at each study visit prior to stimulation testing (and prior to study drug administration at Weeks 24 and 48). (NCT03695237)
Timeframe: Weeks 12, 20, 24, 44, and 48

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 20Week 24Week 44Week 48
Leuprolide Acetate - Overall97.497.497.4100.0100.0
Leuprolide Acetate - Previously Treated100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0
Leuprolide Acetate - Treament Naïve95.595.795.2100.0100.0

[back to top]

Part 1: Percentage of Male Participants With Suppression of Basal Testosterone to < 30 ng/dL at Weeks 12, 20, 24, 44, and 48

Testosterone concentrations were measured from blood samples taken at each study visit prior to stimulation testing (and prior to study drug administration for Weeks 24 and 48). (NCT03695237)
Timeframe: Weeks 12, 20, 24, 44, and 48

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 20Week 24Week 44Week 48
Leuprolide Acetate - Overall100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0
Leuprolide Acetate - Previously Treated100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0
Leuprolide Acetate - Treament Naïve100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0

[back to top]

Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Suppression of the Physical Signs of Puberty

"Breast development in females and testicular volume or genital development in males was assessed using modified Tanner staging, on a scale from Stage 1 (prepubertal) to Stage 5 (adult characteristics).~Females: Suppression is defined as regression or no progression of breast development according to modified Tanner staging.~Males: Suppression is defined as regression or no progression in testicular volume and genital staging according to modified Tanner staging." (NCT03695237)
Timeframe: Weeks 24 and 48

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Females: Week 24Females: Week 48Males: Week 24Males: Week 48
Leuprolide Acetate - Overall92.790.250.075.0
Leuprolide Acetate - Previously Treated94.188.20100
Leuprolide Acetate - Treament Naïve91.791.766.766.7

[back to top]

Part 1: Ratio of Change From Baseline in Bone Age to Change From Baseline in Chronological Age

"Bone age was assessed from radiographs of the hand and wrist by a central imaging vendor using the BoneXpert automated system.~A ratio less than 1 indicates less advancement of bone age compared to chronological age." (NCT03695237)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 24 and 48

,,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Week 24Week 48
Leuprolide Acetate - Overall0.60.5
Leuprolide Acetate - Previously Treated0.50.2
Leuprolide Acetate - Treament Naïve0.70.6

[back to top]

Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Peak GnRHa-stimulated LH to Less Than 4 mlU/mL at Weeks 12, 20, 44, and 48

"Suppression of GnRHa-stimulated luteinizing hormone (LH) was measured using a peak GnRHa stimulation test, performed using subcutaneous injection with an aqueous formulation of leuprolide acetate at 20 µg/kg.~Peak stimulated LH was calculated by taking the maximum LH concentrations measured from blood samples taken at 30 or 60 min following the GnRHa stimulation test.~Suppression of GnRHa-stimulated luteinizing hormone is defined as peak stimulated LH less than 4 mIU/mL." (NCT03695237)
Timeframe: Weeks 12, 20, 44, and 48 (prior to Week 48 dose); samples for LH measurement were taken 30 and 60 minutes after the stimulation test injection.

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 20Week 44Week 48
Leuprolide Acetate - Overall86.788.988.988.9
Leuprolide Acetate - Previously Treated83.394.488.983.3
Leuprolide Acetate - Treament Naïve88.985.288.992.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Peak Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRHa)-Stimulated Luteinizing Hormone (LH) to Less Than 4 mlU/mL at Week 24

"Suppression of GnRHa-stimulated luteinizing hormone (LH) was measured using a peak GnRHa stimulation test, performed using subcutaneous injection with an aqueous formulation of leuprolide acetate at 20 µg/kg.~Peak stimulated LH was calculated by taking the maximum LH concentrations measured from blood samples taken at 30 or 60 min following the GnRHa stimulation test.~Suppression of GnRHa-stimulated luteinizing hormone is defined as peak stimulated LH less than 4 mIU/mL." (NCT03695237)
Timeframe: Week 24 (prior to the Week 24 dose); samples for LH measurement were taken 30 and 60 minutes after the stimulation test injection.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Leuprolide Acetate - Previously Treated94.4
Leuprolide Acetate - Treament Naïve81.5
Leuprolide Acetate - Overall86.7

[back to top]

Mean Right Amygdala-medial Prefrontal Cortex BOLD Connectivity During Implicit Emotion Face Processing Task Over Time

"This outcome measure determines the extent to which irritability is characterized by dysfunctional threat processing during reproductive hormone challenge relative to baseline in HS+ and HS-. By examining amygdala-medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) Blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) connectivity in response to threatening faces on the implicit emotion face processing fMRI task in HS+ (compared with HS-) during hormone challenge relative to baseline.~The implicit emotion face processing task asks participants to identify the gender of angry, happy, and fearful faces at 50%, 100% and 150% emotion intensity presented in random order for 2000 milliseconds followed by jittered fixation. Trials appear in 3 blocks, generating 30 trials of each emotion at each intensity and 90 neutral face emotion trials." (NCT04051320)
Timeframe: up to 6 weeks

,
Interventionarbitrary units (Mean)
Baseline (Visit 3)Hormone Addback (Visit 6)
Hormone Insensitive Women (HS-)0.05330.00804
Hormone Sensitive Women (HS+)0.0174-0.0114

[back to top]

Mean Threat Processing Bias During Visual Dot-probe Paradigm Over Time

"This outcome measure determines the extent to which irritability is characterized by dysfunctional threat processing during reproductive hormone challenge relative to baseline in HS+ and HS- by examining threat attention bias assessed during the visual dot-probe paradigm.~The Visual Dot-Probe Paradigm asks participants to detect a target stimulus that is embedded in a matrix of distracting stimuli (e.g., a target stimulus, an angry face, might be embedded in a matrix of neutral distractor faces). Attention biases are inferred from faster response times to detect a threatening stimulus in a matrix of neutral stimuli relative to response time to detect neutral stimuli in neutral matrices. Thus, positive times reflect attention bias toward threat, whereas negative times reflect attention bias away from threat." (NCT04051320)
Timeframe: up to 6 weeks

,
Interventionattention bias in milliseconds (Mean)
Baseline (Visit 3)Hormone Addback (Visit 6)
Hormone Insensitive Women (HS-)36.92-42.35
Hormone Sensitive Women (HS+)-0.57-9.04

[back to top]

Mean BOLD Activation of the Left Caudate During the Affective Posner Task Over Time

"This outcome measure determines the extent to which HS+ is characterized by BOLD activation of the left caudate in response to frustrative non-reward (FNR) in the Affective Posner Task during hormone addback relative to baseline in the target population.~The Affective Posner Task tests whether HS+ is characterized by reduced subcortical activation in response to frustration. This task is divided into 3 runs: during Run 1 (practice run), participants receive accurate feedback about their performance on the task and do not win or lose money; during Run 2, participants receive accurate feedback about their performance and win or lose 50 cents per trial; and during Run 3 (frustration), participants are told they must respond accurately to win money, but participants are given feedback that they responded too slowly on 60% of accurate trials, regardless of their performance." (NCT04051320)
Timeframe: up to 6 weeks

,
InterventionArbitrary Units (Mean)
Baseline (Visit 3)Hormone Addback (Visit 6)
Hormone Insensitive Women (HS-)0.0077258-0.049988
Hormone Sensitive Women (HS+)-0.0439433330.059099917

[back to top]

Correlation Between Irritability and Reactive Aggression During Hormone Addback

"This outcome measure determines the degree of irritability and reactive aggression in HS+ during hormone addback and its relationship to the target population. Irritability will be defined as score on the IDAS Ill Temper Scale. Reactive aggression will be defined as the number of point subtractions the participant makes during the Point Subtraction Aggression Paradigm.~The Point Subtraction Aggression Paradigm measures relational aggression (approach behavior) in response to frustration. In the task, participants are asked to press a button to ac" (NCT04051320)
Timeframe: Endpoint (week 6)

Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Number)
Hormone Sensitive Women (HS+)0.18
Hormone Insensitive Women (HS-)0.03

[back to top]

Correlation Between Irritability Subcortical Activation in HS+ During Hormone Addback

"This outcome measure determines the degree of subcortical (amygdala, caudate, putamen, and nucleus accumbens) activation in HS+ during hormone addback and it's relationship to the target population. The activation in amygdala and ventral striatum (caudate, putamen, nucleus accumbens) regions of interest (ROIs) will be assessed during the Affective Posner Task.~The Affective Posner Task tests whether HS+ is characterized by reduced subcortical activation in response to frustration. This task is divided into 3 runs: during Run 1 (practice run), participants receive accurate feedback about their performance on the task and do not win or lose money; during Run 2, participants receive accurate feedback about their performance and win or lose 50 cents per trial; and during Run 3 (frustration), participants are told they must respond accurately to win money, but participants are given feedback that they responded too slowly on 60% of accurate trials, regardless of their performance." (NCT04051320)
Timeframe: Endpoint (week 6)

Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Number)
Hormone Sensitive Women (HS+)0.47

[back to top]

Correlation Between the Inventory of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) Ill -0.8Scale and Threat Attention Bias

This outcome measure determines the extent to which irritability is characterized by dysfunctional reward processing during reproductive hormone challenge in HS+ and HS- by examining the correlation between the Inventory of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) Ill Temper (i.e., irritability) Scale and threat attention bias. (NCT04051320)
Timeframe: Endpoint (week 6)

Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Number)
Hormone Sensitive Women (HS+)-0.35
Hormone Insensitive Women (HS-)0.11

[back to top]

Correlation Between the Inventory of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) Ill Temper Scale and Left Amygdala-medial Prefrontal Cortex (PFC) BOLD Connectivity.

This outcome measure determines the extent to which irritability is characterized by dysfunctional reward processing during reproductive hormone challenge in HS+ and HS- by examining the correlation between the IDAS Ill Temper (i.e., irritability) Scale and amygdala-medial PFC connectivity in HS+. (NCT04051320)
Timeframe: Endpoint (week 6)

Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Mean)
Hormone Sensitive Women (HS+)-0.13
Hormone Insensitive Women (HS-)0.49

[back to top]

Correlation Between the Inventory of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) Ill Temper Scale and Right Amygdala-medial Prefrontal Cortex (PFC) BOLD Connectivity.

This outcome measure determines the extent to which irritability is characterized by dysfunctional reward processing during reproductive hormone challenge in HS+ and HS- by examining the correlation between the IDAS Ill Temper (i.e., irritability) Scale and amygdala-medial PFC connectivity in HS+. (NCT04051320)
Timeframe: Endpoint (week 6)

Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Number)
Hormone Sensitive Women (HS+)-0.57
Hormone Insensitive Women (HS-)-0.08

[back to top]

Mean BOLD Activation of the Left Amygdala During the Affective Posner Task Over Time

"This outcome measure determines the extent to which HS+ is characterized by BOLD activation of the left amygdala in response to frustrative non-reward (FNR) in the Affective Posner Task during hormone addback relative to baseline in the target population.~The Affective Posner Task tests whether HS+ is characterized by reduced subcortical activation in response to frustration. This task is divided into 3 runs: during Run 1 (practice run), participants receive accurate feedback about their performance on the task and do not win or lose money; during Run 2, participants receive accurate feedback about their performance and win or lose 50 cents per trial; and during Run 3 (frustration), participants are told they must respond accurately to win money, but participants are given feedback that they responded too slowly on 60% of accurate trials, regardless of their performance." (NCT04051320)
Timeframe: up to 6 weeks

,
InterventionArbitrary Units (Mean)
Baseline (Visit 3)Hormone Addback (Visit 6)
Hormone Insensitive Women (HS-)-0.009866667-0.086876444
Hormone Sensitive Women (HS+)0.005316917-0.047401917

[back to top]

Mean BOLD Activation of the Left Nucleus Accumbens During the Affective Posner Task Over Time

"This outcome measure determines the extent to which HS+ is characterized by BOLD activation of the left nucleus accumbens in response to frustrative non-reward (FNR) in the Affective Posner Task during hormone addback relative to baseline in the target population.~The Affective Posner Task tests whether HS+ is characterized by reduced subcortical activation in response to frustration. This task is divided into 3 runs: during Run 1 (practice run), participants receive accurate feedback about their performance on the task and do not win or lose money; during Run 2, participants receive accurate feedback about their performance and win or lose 50 cents per trial; and during Run 3 (frustration), participants are told they must respond accurately to win money, but participants are given feedback that they responded too slowly on 60% of accurate trials, regardless of their performance." (NCT04051320)
Timeframe: up to 6 weeks

,
InterventionArbitrary Units (Mean)
Baseline (Visit 3)Hormone Addback (Visit 6)
Hormone Insensitive Women (HS-)0.0691907-0.072512
Hormone Sensitive Women (HS+)-0.0284518180.031632727

[back to top]

Mean BOLD Activation of the Left Putamen During the Affective Posner Task Over Time

"This outcome measure determines the extent to which HS+ is characterized by BOLD activation of the left putamen in response to frustrative non-reward (FNR) in the Affective Posner Task during hormone addback relative to baseline in the target population.~The Affective Posner Task tests whether HS+ is characterized by reduced subcortical activation in response to frustration. This task is divided into 3 runs: during Run 1 (practice run), participants receive accurate feedback about their performance on the task and do not win or lose money; during Run 2, participants receive accurate feedback about their performance and win or lose 50 cents per trial; and during Run 3 (frustration), participants are told they must respond accurately to win money, but participants are given feedback that they responded too slowly on 60% of accurate trials, regardless of their performance." (NCT04051320)
Timeframe: up to 6 weeks

,
InterventionArbitrary Units (Mean)
Baseline (Visit 3)Hormone Addback (Visit 6)
Hormone Insensitive Women (HS-)0.0383029-0.021029
Hormone Sensitive Women (HS+)-0.0012234620.048155385

[back to top]

Mean BOLD Activation of the Right Amygdala During the Affective Posner Task Over Time

"This outcome measure determines the extent to which HS+ is characterized by BOLD activation of the right amygdala in response to frustrative non-reward (FNR) in the Affective Posner Task during hormone addback relative to baseline in the target population.~The Affective Posner Task tests whether HS+ is characterized by reduced subcortical activation in response to frustration. This task is divided into 3 runs: during Run 1 (practice run), participants receive accurate feedback about their performance on the task and do not win or lose money; during Run 2, participants receive accurate feedback about their performance and win or lose 50 cents per trial; and during Run 3 (frustration), participants are told they must respond accurately to win money, but participants are given feedback that they responded too slowly on 60% of accurate trials, regardless of their performance." (NCT04051320)
Timeframe: up to 6 weeks

,
InterventionArbitrary Units (Mean)
Baseline (Visit 3)Hormone Addback (Visit 6)
Hormone Insensitive Women (HS-)0.037334-0.15643
Hormone Sensitive Women (HS+)-0.045440.022654

[back to top]

Mean BOLD Activation of the Right Caudate During the Affective Posner Task Over Time

"This outcome measure determines the extent to which HS+ is characterized by BOLD activation of the right caudate in response to frustrative non-reward (FNR) in the Affective Posner Task during hormone addback relative to baseline in the target population.~The Affective Posner Task tests whether HS+ is characterized by reduced subcortical activation in response to frustration. This task is divided into 3 runs: during Run 1 (practice run), participants receive accurate feedback about their performance on the task and do not win or lose money; during Run 2, participants receive accurate feedback about their performance and win or lose 50 cents per trial; and during Run 3 (frustration), participants are told they must respond accurately to win money, but participants are given feedback that they responded too slowly on 60% of accurate trials, regardless of their performance." (NCT04051320)
Timeframe: up to 6 weeks

,
InterventionArbitrary Units (Mean)
Baseline (Visit 3)Hormone Addback (Visit 6)
Hormone Insensitive Women (HS-)0.0614070.0058011
Hormone Sensitive Women (HS+)-0.0699190770.045146154

[back to top]

Mean BOLD Activation of the Right Nucleus Accumbens During the Affective Posner Task Over Time

"This outcome measure determines the extent to which HS+ is characterized by BOLD activation of the right nucleus accumbens in response to frustrative non-reward (FNR) in the Affective Posner Task during hormone addback relative to baseline in the target population.~The Affective Posner Task tests whether HS+ is characterized by reduced subcortical activation in response to frustration. This task is divided into 3 runs: during Run 1 (practice run), participants receive accurate feedback about their performance on the task and do not win or lose money; during Run 2, participants receive accurate feedback about their performance and win or lose 50 cents per trial; and during Run 3 (frustration), participants are told they must respond accurately to win money, but participants are given feedback that they responded too slowly on 60% of accurate trials, regardless of their performance." (NCT04051320)
Timeframe: up to 6 weeks

,
InterventionArbitrary Units (Mean)
Baseline (Visit 3)Hormone Addback (Visit 6)
Hormone Insensitive Women (HS-)0.052685333-0.006394444
Hormone Sensitive Women (HS+)0.044384167-0.005181667

[back to top]

Mean BOLD Activation of the Right Putamen During the Affective Posner Task Over Time

"This outcome measure determines the extent to which HS+ is characterized by BOLD activation of the right putamen in response to frustrative non-reward (FNR) in the Affective Posner Task during hormone addback relative to baseline in the target population.~The Affective Posner Task tests whether HS+ is characterized by reduced subcortical activation in response to frustration. This task is divided into 3 runs: during Run 1 (practice run), participants receive accurate feedback about their performance on the task and do not win or lose money; during Run 2, participants receive accurate feedback about their performance and win or lose 50 cents per trial; and during Run 3 (frustration), participants are told they must respond accurately to win money, but participants are given feedback that they responded too slowly on 60% of accurate trials, regardless of their performance." (NCT04051320)
Timeframe: up to 6 weeks

,
InterventionArbitrary Units (Mean)
Baseline (Visit 3)Hormone Addback (Visit 6)
Hormone Insensitive Women (HS-)0.002542222-0.080736333
Hormone Sensitive Women (HS+)-0.0075606920.036225385

[back to top]

Mean Left Amygdala-medial Prefrontal Cortex BOLD Connectivity During Implicit Emotion Face Processing Task Over Time

"This outcome measure determines the extent to which irritability is characterized by dysfunctional threat processing during reproductive hormone challenge relative to baseline in HS+ and HS-. By examining amygdala-medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) connectivity in response to threatening faces on the implicit emotion face processing fMRI task in HS+ (compared with HS-) during hormone challenge relative to baseline.~The implicit emotion face processing task asks participants to identify the gender of angry, happy, and fearful faces at 50%, 100% and 150% emotion intensity presented in random order for 2000 milliseconds followed by jittered fixation. Trials appear in 3 blocks, generating 30 trials of each emotion at each intensity and 90 neutral face emotion trials." (NCT04051320)
Timeframe: up to 6 weeks

,
Interventionarbitrary units (Mean)
Baseline (Visit 3)Hormone Addback (Visit 6)
Hormone Insensitive Women (HS-)0.02130.00111
Hormone Sensitive Women (HS+)0.0247-0.0192

[back to top]

Mean Reactive Aggression During Hormone Addback Over Time

"This outcome measure determines the extent to which HS+ is characterized by reactive aggression during hormone addback relative to baseline in the target population. Reactive aggression will be defined as the number of point subtractions the participant makes during the Point Subtraction Aggression Paradigm.~Point Subtraction Aggression Paradigm measures relational aggression (approach behavior) in response to frustration. In the task, participants are asked to press a button to accrue money or press another button to subtract money from a (fictional) partner at no direct gain to themselves. Frustration is induced by periodic subtractions of their own money, which is attributed to the partner." (NCT04051320)
Timeframe: up to 6 weeks

,
InterventionNumber of subtraction responses (Mean)
Baseline (Visit 3)Hormone Addback (Visit 6)
Hormone Insensitive Women (HS-)129.2054.90
Hormone Sensitive Women (HS+)103.0834.62

[back to top]

Change in Response Latency to Reward During the Monetary Incentive Delay Task During Estradiol Manipulation

"Time (ms) between stimulus and response will be measured during the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task during the win trials during the estradiol intervention. During the MID task, participants need to select the correct response during win and lose conditions by pressing a button. Higher scores indicate a longer response time to the win trials. Change is defined by an average change score." (NCT04225221)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)

Interventionms (Mean)
Estradiol-9.0

[back to top]

Change in Self-Reported Behavioral Inhibition Score During Estradiol Manipulation

This measures assesses individual disposition toward avoidance of activities during the estradiol intervention. The Behavioural Inhibition subscale of the Behavioural Inhibition Scale/Behavioral Activation Scale (BIS/BAS) assesses behavioural inhibition (BI) using participant self-reports. The minimum score on the BIS subscale is 7, maximum 28. Greater scores indicate greater behavioural inhibition. Change is defined by an average change score (NCT04225221)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol0.90

[back to top]

Change in Weekly Average Binge-eating Frequency

Binge eating frequency is based on a daily diary of self-reported binge eating frequency. Scores can range from 0 to infinity as they represent a self-reported frequency. Subjects self-report the number of binge eating episodes they had each day. Higher numbers indicate more frequent binge eating episodes. Average weekly frequency will be determined based on daily reported binge eating frequency. Change is defined by an average change score. (NCT04225221)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of each intervention)

Interventionepisodes/week (Mean)
Estradiol-0.48
Progesterone1.1

[back to top]

Change in Behavioral Activation Score During Estradiol Manipulation

This measures assesses individual disposition toward engaging in activities during the estradiol intervention. Two BIS/BAS behavioural activation (BA) subscales will be used. The BA subscales used are Fun Seeking and Drive. Each subscale is summed to get the respective subscale scores. The minimum score on BA Fun Seeking and BA Drive are minimum 4 and maximum 16. Higher scores indicate greater behavioral activation. Change is defined by an average change score. (NCT04225221)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Fun SeekingDrive
Estradiol-0.100

[back to top]

Change in Self-Reported Reward Sensitivity Subscale Score During Estradiol Manipulation

Sensitivity to Punishment/Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire will be used to measure reward sensitivity during estradiol intervention. The reward sensitivity subscale will be used, which is rated on a true/false scale with scores ranging 0-24. Higher scores indicate more sensitivity to reward. Change is defined by an average change score. (NCT04225221)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol-0.80

[back to top]

Change in Delay Discounting Parameter k Using the Monetary Choice Questionnaire With Estradiol Manipulation

During the estradiol intervention, participants will be asked to make a series of hypothetical choices between small, sooner (impulsive) vs. larger, later (self controlled) hypothetical monetary outcomes. k is a hyperbolic function with larger k values indicating more valuation of a larger delayed reward and smaller values indicating preference for more immediate, smaller rewards (more impulsivity). Change is defined as the average change in k. (NCT04225221)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)

Interventionk value (Mean)
Estradiol-0.0047

[back to top]

Change in Binge Eating Sum Score

"Binge eating will be measured using the 8-item binge eating subscale of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI), which measures features of binge eating (e.g., consumption of large quantities of food, mindless eating) on a 5-point Likert scale from never to very often. The EPSI scale is designed to assess behavior over the past 28 days; however, to be sensitive to the timeframe of the present study, the instructions will be modified to ask participants to consider the past week. Items are summed for a scale score ranging from 0-32. Higher scores indicate more frequent experiences with binge eating behavior. Change is defined by an average change score." (NCT04225221)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of each intervention)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol-0.60
Progesterone0.89

[back to top]

Change in Behavioral Inhibition During Estradiol Administration as Assessed Through a Behavioral Task

"Behavioral response inhibition will be examined during a go/no-go computerized task during the estradiol intervention. Inhibitory control is defined by the response accuracy of the go no/go trials. Percent of errors is calculated as the number of go responses on a no/go trial divided by the total number of no/go trials. Fewer errors (go response on a no/go trial) indicates better inhibitory control. Change is defined by an average change score." (NCT04225221)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)

Interventionpercentage of errors (Mean)
Estradiol-0.094

[back to top]

Change in Behavioral Activation Reward Responsiveness With Estradiol Manipulation

This measures assesses individual disposition toward avoiding and engaging in activities during estradiol intervention. The BIS/BAS reward responsiveness subscale will be used. The minimum score on the BA Reward Responsiveness subscale is 5, maximum 20. Higher scores indicate greater reward responsiveness. Change is defined by an average change score. (NCT04225221)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Estradiol0.10

[back to top]

Correlation Between Change in Reward Response and Change in Binge Eating Before and During Estradiol Manipulation

Pearson correlations between change in self-reported reward response and change in binge eating between baseline and estradiol intervention will be examined. Binge eating is defined as the sum score from the Eating Pathology Symptom Inventory (EPSI). Self-reported reward response is defined as the BAS reward responsiveness subscale score and the Sensitivity to Reward/Sensitivity to Punishment Questionnaire (SPSRQ) sensitivity to reward subscale score. Change in binge eating and change in reward response between baseline and estradiol intervention was calculated and a correlation conducted between change scores. (NCT04225221)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)

InterventionPearson correlation coefficient (Number)
BAS Reward ResponsivenessSensitivity to Reward
Estradiol-0.146-0.132

[back to top]