Page last updated: 2024-11-12

cilastatin, imipenem drug combination

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination: Combination of imipenem and cilastatin that is used in the treatment of bacterial infections; cilastatin inhibits renal dehydropeptidase I to prolong the half-life and increase the tissue penetration of imipenem, enhancing its efficacy as an anti-bacterial agent. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID17756656
CHEMBL ID1628401
MeSH IDM0130282

Synonyms (14)

Synonym
imipenem - cilastatin
thienam
tienam 500
cilastatin, imipenem drug combination
92309-29-0
cilastatin / imipenem
1-azabicyclo(3.2.0)hept-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid, 6-((1r)-1-hydroxyethyl)-3-((2-((iminomethyl)amino)ethyl)thio)-7-oxo-, (5r,6s)-, mixt. with (2z)-7-(((2r)-2-amino-2-carboxyethyl)thio)-2-((((1s)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropyl)carbonyl)amino)-2-heptenoic acid
imipenem / cilastatin
imipenem and cilastatin
tainem
1-azabicyclo(3.2.0)hept-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid, 6-(1-hydroxyethyl)-3-((2-((iminomethyl)amino)ethyl)thio)-7-oxo-, (5r-(5alpha,6alpha(r*)))-, mixt. with (r-(r*,s*-(z)))-7-((2-amino-2-carboxyethyl)thio)-2-(((2,2-dimethylcyclopropyl)carbonyl)amino)-2-heptano
CHEMBL1628401
imipenem-cilastatin sodium hydrate
(z)-7-[(2r)-2-amino-2-carboxyethyl]sulfanyl-2-[[(1s)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarbonyl]amino]hept-2-enoic acid;(5r,6s)-3-[2-(aminomethylideneamino)ethylsulfanyl]-6-[(1r)-1-hydroxyethyl]-7-oxo-1-azabicyclo[3.2.0]hept-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid

Research Excerpts

Toxicity

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Adverse effects were generally mild and reversible and included diarrhea alone or with vomiting (5."( Imipenem-cilastatin in pediatric patients: an overview of safety and efficacy in studies conducted in the United States.
Ahonkhai, VI; Brown, KR; Cyhan, GM; Wilson, SE, 1989
)
0.28
" In the remaining two patients treatment had to be prematurely discontinued due to adverse effects."( Efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin in the empirical treatment of septicemia.
Del Valle, J; Noriega, AR; Otero, JR; Revilla, AP; Sanz, F, 1987
)
0.27
" Because VCM has the adverse reaction of nephrotoxicity, we are apprehensive about using VCM with other antibiotics, which might increase this problem."( [Nephrotoxicity and drug interaction of vancomycin (2)].
Nakagawa, Y; Toyoguchi, T, 1996
)
0.29
"719]) were the most frequently reported adverse events."( The efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: analysis of pooled clinical trial data.
Babinchak, T; Dartois, N; Ellis-Grosse, E; Loh, E; Rose, GM, 2005
)
0.33
"435]) were the most frequently reported adverse events."( A multicenter trial of the efficacy and safety of tigecycline versus imipenem/cilastatin in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections [Study ID Numbers: 3074A1-301-WW; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00081744].
Babinchak, T; Campos, M; Ellis-Grosse, EJ; Loh, E; Oliva, ME; Pasternak, J; Rekha, A; Rose, GM; Yellin, A, 2005
)
0.33
" Most commonly reported treatment emergent adverse events for tigecycline and imipenem/cilastatin were nausea (14."( The efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections - the European experience.
Babinchak, T; Castaing, N; Cooper, A; Dartois, N; De Vane, N; Fomin, P; Koalov, S; Tellado, J, 2008
)
0.35
" Drug-induced seizures are a rare but serious adverse effect, with carbapenems being one of the most common classes of antibiotics associated with seizures."( Safety of imipenem/cilastatin in neurocritical care patients.
Brophy, GM; Hoffman, J; Trimble, J, 2009
)
0.35
" The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 80."( Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial.
Bi, J; Chen, X; Chen, Z; Cooper, A; Leng, X; Li, R; Liu, D; Ma, X; Maroko, R; Quan, Z; Wei, J; Wu, J; Wu, Z; Yan, L; Yu, Y; Zhang, Y, 2010
)
0.36
" We compared the incidence of adverse events in hospitalized infants receiving meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin."( Adverse events associated with meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin therapy in a large retrospective cohort of hospitalized infants.
Benjamin, DK; Capparelli, EV; Clark, RH; Cohen-Wolkowiez, M; Herring, AH; Hornik, CP; Kearns, GL; Smith, PB; van den Anker, J, 2013
)
0.39
" Multivariable conditional logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between carbapenem therapy and adverse events, controlling for infant factors and severity of illness."( Adverse events associated with meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin therapy in a large retrospective cohort of hospitalized infants.
Benjamin, DK; Capparelli, EV; Clark, RH; Cohen-Wolkowiez, M; Herring, AH; Hornik, CP; Kearns, GL; Smith, PB; van den Anker, J, 2013
)
0.39
"In this cohort of infants, meropenem was associated with more frequent but less severe adverse events when compared with imipenem/cilastatin."( Adverse events associated with meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin therapy in a large retrospective cohort of hospitalized infants.
Benjamin, DK; Capparelli, EV; Clark, RH; Cohen-Wolkowiez, M; Herring, AH; Hornik, CP; Kearns, GL; Smith, PB; van den Anker, J, 2013
)
0.39
"0% of patients, respectively, had treatment-emergent adverse events."( Prospective, randomized, double-blind, Phase 2 dose-ranging study comparing efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin plus relebactam with imipenem/cilastatin alone in patients with complicated urinary tract infections.
Akers, W; Brown, ML; Du, J; Kartsonis, NA; Lee, YC; Mariyanovski, V; McLeroth, P; Paschke, A; Pedley, A; Sims, M, 2017
)
0.46
" Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 74."( The safety and efficacy of relebactam/imipenem/cilastatin in Japanese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection or complicated urinary tract infection: A multicenter, open-label, noncomparative phase 3 study.
Aoyama, N; Bando, H; Brown, M; Kawahara, K; Kikukawa, H; Kohno, S; Paschke, A; Shirakawa, M; Takase, A; Yoneyama, F, 2021
)
0.62
"We conducted a meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing novel carbapenem-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations with comparators to assess the clinical and microbiological responses, mortality, and adverse events (AEs)."( Efficacy and safety of novel carbapenem-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: Results from phase II and III trials.
Luo, Q; Shen, P; Xiao, Y; Xiong, L; Yu, W, 2022
)
0.72
" Serious adverse events were reported in 36 (40%) of 91 patients in the sulbactam-durlobactam group and 42 (49%) of 86 patients in the colistin group."( Efficacy and safety of sulbactam-durlobactam versus colistin for the treatment of patients with serious infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex: a multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority clinical tri
Altarac, D; Chen, L; Du, B; Isaacs, R; Kaye, KS; Lewis, D; Miller, A; O'Donnell, J; Poirier, GE; Rana, K; Reinhart, H; Shorr, AF; Srinivasan, S; Wunderink, RG, 2023
)
0.91
" No severe or life-threatening adverse events were encountered."( Effectiveness and Safety of Intra-arterial Imipenem/Cilastatin Sodium Infusion for Patients with Hand Osteoarthritis-Related Interphalangeal Joint Pain.
Huang, HH; Liang, KW; Tsao, TF; Tyan, YS; Wang, B; Wang, PH, 2023
)
0.91

Pharmacokinetics

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Intravenously administered FCE 22101 at a dose of 250 mg gave peak plasma concentrations of about 12 mg/l and the plasma half-life was about 60 min."( Pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects of FCE 22101 and its acetoxymethyl ester, FCE 22891: effect of co-administration of imipenem/cilastatin on the renal metabolism of FCE 22101.
Burman, LA; Cassinelli, G; Corigli, R; Dornbusch, K; Franceschi, G; Norrby, SR; Sassella, D, 1990
)
0.28
"96 mg/l), plasma half-life (60 min), volume of distribution (0."( Pharmacokinetics of imipenem/cilastatin in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies.
Farrell, I; Janmohamed, RM; Kelly, J; Leyland, MJ, 1990
)
0.28
"76 hours, and the half-life of CS tended to be longer than that of IPM."( [Pharmacokinetic and clinical evaluations of imipenem/cilastatin sodium in neonates and premature infants].
Fujimoto, T; Kawakami, A; Koga, T; Motohiro, T; Oda, K; Sakata, Y; Shimada, Y; Tanaka, K; Tominaga, K; Tomita, S, 1989
)
0.28
" Drug levels in plasma and the peritoneal dialysis fluid were analyzed at frequent intervals, and various pharmacokinetic variables were calculated for a one-compartment open model."( Pharmacokinetics of imipenem-cilastatin in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.
Freimer, EH; Gross, ML; Higgins, JT; Somani, P, 1988
)
0.27
" Pharmacokinetic studies were performed in the 11 children and in 10 of the neonates."( Pharmacokinetic and clinical evaluation of imipenem/cilastatin in children and neonates.
Baron, S; Bégué, PC; Challier, P; Fontaine, JL; Lasfargues, G, 1987
)
0.27
"To determine the appropriate compartmental and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters for intravenous piperacillin and tazobactam."( Piperacillin-tazobactam pharmacokinetics in patients with intraabdominal infections.
Burm, JP; Gill, MA; Jhee, SS; Kern, JW; Yellin, AE,
)
0.13
"The estimated noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters (mean +/- SD) for piperacillin and tazobactam, respectively, were as follows: maximum concentration in plasma 218."( Piperacillin-tazobactam pharmacokinetics in patients with intraabdominal infections.
Burm, JP; Gill, MA; Jhee, SS; Kern, JW; Yellin, AE,
)
0.13
" Therefore, knowledge of the impact of continuous haemofiltration on drug elimination and the pharmacokinetic profile of drugs is essential to good clinical management."( Clinical pharmacokinetics during continuous haemofiltration.
Bressolle, F; de la Coussaye, JE; Eledjam, JJ; Galtier, M; Kinowski, JM; Wynn, N, 1994
)
0.29
" Imipenem pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in 10 anuric patients with renal failure managed by continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH)."( Comparison of imipenem pharmacokinetics in patients with acute or chronic renal failure treated with continuous hemofiltration.
Macias, WL; Mueller, BA; Scarim, SK, 1993
)
0.29
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were based on an open two-compartment model and a noncompartmental technique."( Serum bactericidal activities and comparative pharmacokinetics of meropenem and imipenem-cilastatin.
Borner, K; Dreetz, M; Eller, J; Hamacher, J; Koeppe, P; Lode, H; Schaberg, T, 1996
)
0.29
"h/ml in the chimpanzee) and a longer half-life at beta phase (1."( Pharmacokinetics in nonhuman primates of a prototype carbapenem active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Cama, L; Kropp, H; Sasor, MW; Sundelof, JG; Thompson, R; White, KM, 1996
)
0.29
" Pharmacokinetic variables were calculated by a first-order, two-compartment pharmacokinetic model for both substances."( Pharmacokinetics of imipenem-cilastatin in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration.
Bremer, F; Brune, K; Geisslinger, G; Oelkers, R; Schobel, H; Schüttler, J; Tegeder, I, 1997
)
0.3
"To investigate the pharmacokinetic characteristics of Imipenem/cilastatin in burn patients during the acute phase."( [Study on the pharmacokinetics of Imipenem cilastatin in burn patients during the acute phase].
Peng, Y; Wang, H; Xiao, G, 2000
)
0.31
"Compared to those in control group, pharmacokinetic parameters of Imipenem exhibited evident difference, such as prolonged half-life [(1."( [Study on the pharmacokinetics of Imipenem cilastatin in burn patients during the acute phase].
Peng, Y; Wang, H; Xiao, G, 2000
)
0.31
" Pharmacokinetic parameters, obtained from previously published studies in healthy volunteers were used to simulate the %T > MIC for 10,000 patients receiving imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam."( Pharmacodynamic modeling of beta-lactam antibiotics for the empiric treatment of secondary peritonitis: a report from the OPTAMA program.
Kotapati, S; Kuti, JL; Nicolau, DP, 2005
)
0.33
"The bactericidal exposures necessary for positive clinical outcomes among skin and soft tissue infections are largely dependent on interpatient pharmacokinetic variability and pathogen drug susceptibility."( Pharmacodynamic modeling of imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam for empiric therapy of skin and soft tissue infections: a report from the OPTAMA Program.
Kuti, JL; Nicolau, DP; Ong, CT, 2005
)
0.33
"This phase I study assessed the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic profiles of relebactam (MK-7655), a novel β-lactamase inhibitor, and imipenem."( Intrapulmonary Pharmacokinetics of Relebactam, a Novel β-Lactamase Inhibitor, Dosed in Combination with Imipenem-Cilastatin in Healthy Subjects.
Bi, S; Butterton, JR; Chavez-Eng, CM; Gotfried, MH; Jumes, PA; Mangin, E; Rhee, EG; Rizk, ML; Zhang, Z; Zhao, T, 2018
)
0.48
" This decision was based on substantial clinical and pre-clinical data, including rigorous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic work, and is an important step forward in the management of these debilitating conditions."( Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Imipenem-Cilastatin/Relebactam Combination Therapy.
McCarthy, MW, 2020
)
0.56
" The pharmacokinetic profile is a beta-lactam one: no oral absorption, and with a wide distribution within the vascular space and the interstitial fluid of well vascularized tissues, reaching therapeutic concentrations in the alveolar lavage fluid and within the macrophage."( Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics and tolerability of cefiderocol in the clinical setting.
Azanza Perea, JR; Sádaba Díaz de Rada, B, 2022
)
0.72

Compound-Compound Interactions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"In a randomised and coordinated multicentre study, 143 patients with severe infections received treatment with either imipenem/cilastatin (72; I/C group) or cefotaxime combined with metronidazole and optional cloxacillin (71; CX/M/CL group)."( Imipenem/cilastatin as monotherapy in severe infections: comparison with cefotaxime in combination with metronidazole and cloxacillin. Report from a Norwegian Study Group.
, 1987
)
0.27
" These results indicate that IPM/CS alone produces of good response in moderate to severe respiratory infections while IPM/CS combined with AMK is useful in intractable respiratory infections."( [Imipenem/cilastatin sodium alone or combined with amikacin sulfate in respiratory infections].
Ichikawa, Y; Ishibashi, T; Oizumi, K; Takamoto, M; Tamaru, N; Tanaka, H; Tokunaga, N; Toyoshima, H; Watanabe, K; Yoshida, M, 1994
)
0.29
" Therefore, the nephrotoxic effects and pharmacokinetics of VCM were examined in rabbits and compared with those in rabbits administered with VCM and other antibiotics."( [Nephrotoxicity and drug interaction of vancomycin (2)].
Nakagawa, Y; Toyoguchi, T, 1996
)
0.29
"Convulsant activity of pazufloxacin mesilate (PZFX mesilate), a new quinolone antibacterial agent for intravenous use, in combination with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) was investigated in mice after intravenous or intracerebroventricular administration."( [Drug interactions between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and pazufloxacin mesilate, a new quinolone antibacterial agent for intravenous use: convulsions in mice after intravenous or intracerebroventricular administration].
Fukuda, H; Kawamura, Y, 2002
)
0.31
"β-Lactamase inhibitors with a bicyclic urea core and a variety of heterocyclic side chains were prepared and evaluated as potential partners for combination with imipenem to overcome class A and C β-lactamase mediated antibiotic resistance."( Discovery of MK-7655, a β-lactamase inhibitor for combination with Primaxin®.
Blizzard, TA; Bodner, R; Chen, H; Fitzgerald, P; Gude, C; Ha, S; Hairston, N; Hammond, ML; Hermes, J; Imbriglio, J; Kim, S; Lu, J; Ogawa, A; Painter, RE; Park, YW; Raghoobar, S; Scapin, G; Sharma, N; Wisniewski, D; Wu, J; Young, K, 2014
)
0.4
" SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Drug combination is an effective approach for the treatment of resistant bacterial infection."( In vitro interactions of ambroxol hydrochloride or amlodipine in combination with antibacterial agents against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.
Li, X; Lu, C; Sun, S; Wang, D; Wang, Y, 2020
)
0.56

Bioavailability

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Bioavailability was 93."( Pharmacokinetics of imipenem after intravenous, intramuscular and subcutaneous administration to cats.
Albarellos, GA; Denamiel, GA; Landoni, MF; Lupi, MP; Montoya, L; Quaine, PC, 2013
)
0.39

Dosage Studied

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"To report a case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa endocarditis that was successfully treated with high-dose imipenem/cilastatin and to discuss dosage modification based on individual pharmacokinetic parameters."( Successful use of higher-than-recommended dosage of imipenem in Pseudomonas aeruginosa endocarditis.
Hrdy, DB; Kailath, EJ; King, JH, 1992
)
0.28
" Dosage may need to be adjusted to body size in order to obtain optimal serum concentrations and activity."( Successful use of higher-than-recommended dosage of imipenem in Pseudomonas aeruginosa endocarditis.
Hrdy, DB; Kailath, EJ; King, JH, 1992
)
0.28
" (22) and other dosages (a change in dosing regimen, 2)."( [Clinical study of intramuscular imipenem/cilastatin sodium in the field of obstetrics and gynecology].
Banzai, M; Chimura, T; Kanasugi, H; Kihara, K; Matsuo, M; Miyata, R; Oda, T; Takahashi, H; Yamazaki, K; Yokoyama, Y, 1991
)
0.28
" Mean imipenem AUCss (area under the concentration-time curve over a dosage interval at steady state) values were 38."( Steady-state pharmacokinetics of intramuscular imipenem-cilastatin in elderly patients with various degrees of renal function.
Bland, JA; Graziani, AL; Lawson, LA; MacGregor, RR; Pietroski, NA; Rogers, JD, 1991
)
0.28
" Dosing regimens in evaluable patients were 500 mg every 12 h (45."( Intramuscular imipenem/cilastatin in multiple-dose treatment regimens: review of the worldwide clinical experience.
Calandra, GB; Garau, J, 1991
)
0.28
"Imipenem is the broadest-spectrum antibiotic currently available but requires frequent intravenous dosing for efficacy."( Overall clinical utility of the intramuscular preparation of imipenem/cilastatin.
MacGregor, RR, 1991
)
0.28
" Pharmacists evaluated I/C dosage based upon culture/sensitivity results and indicators of renal function."( Evaluation of an imipenem/cilastatin target drug program.
Abel, SR; Guba, EA, 1991
)
0.28
" This dose should be the starting dose for a period of 12-h dosing intervals until the next IHF procedure."( Pharmacokinetics of intravenous imipenem/cilastatin during intermittent haemofiltration.
Alarabi, AA; Cars, O; Danielson, BG; Salmonson, T; Wikström, B, 1990
)
0.28
" Up to six hours after dosing the concentrations in prostatic secretions ranged between 1 and 2 mg/l."( [Imipenem/cilastatin: in vitro activity, concentrations in plasma and prostatic adenoma and therapeutic results in patients with complicated urinary tract infections].
Adam, D; Bauernfeind, A; Hönig, E; Naber, KG, 1986
)
0.27
" The concentration of IPM in plasma showed a dose-response to the 10 mg/10 mg/kg and 20 mg/20 mg/kg dosages."( [Pharmacokinetic, bacteriological and clinical studies on imipenem/cilastatin sodium in neonates].
Iwai, N; Kasai, K; Miyazu, M; Nakamura, H; Taneda, Y, 1989
)
0.28
" There was an association with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection that remained statistically significant even after controlling for imipenem/cilastatin dosage as well as for the other factors indicated."( Factors predisposing to seizures in seriously ill infected patients receiving antibiotics: experience with imipenem/cilastatin.
Calandra, G; Carrigan, J; Guess, H; Lydick, E; Weiss, L, 1988
)
0.27
"The chemistry, antimicrobial spectrum, mechanism of action, pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, clinical use, adverse effects, dosage and administration, place in therapy, cost-effectiveness, and formulary considerations of imipenem-cilastatin sodium are reviewed."( Imipenem-cilastatin sodium, a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibiotic combination.
Pastel, DA, 1986
)
0.27
" Imipenem and cilastatin sodium in a dosage of 100 mg/kg/d was used for children 3 years of age or younger, while older ones received 60 mg/kg/d intravenously, divided in four equal doses."( Imipenem and cilastatin in acute osteomyelitis and suppurative arthritis. Therapy in infants and children.
Freij, BJ; Kusmiesz, H; Nelson, JD; Shelton, S, 1987
)
0.27
" Because patients undergoing continuous haemofiltration have impaired renal function, dosage reduction is often recommended so that adverse drug reactions are avoided."( Clinical pharmacokinetics during continuous haemofiltration.
Bressolle, F; de la Coussaye, JE; Eledjam, JJ; Galtier, M; Kinowski, JM; Wynn, N, 1994
)
0.29
" At the dosage used piperacillin/tazobactam was as safe as, and statistically more effective than, imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections caused by sensitive organisms."( A randomized multicenter trial of piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Swedish Study Group.
Eklund, AE; Nord, CE, 1993
)
0.29
" Current dosing recommendations for the administration of imipenem to patients with acute or chronic renal failure are based on this reduced clearance rate."( Comparison of imipenem pharmacokinetics in patients with acute or chronic renal failure treated with continuous hemofiltration.
Macias, WL; Mueller, BA; Scarim, SK, 1993
)
0.29
"To develop computerized methods to monitor and recommend dosage changes for patients treated with excessive dosages of imipenem/cilastatin (I/C) and to determine the incidence of I/C-associated seizures in our patient population."( Prospective surveillance of imipenem/cilastatin use and associated seizures using a hospital information system.
Burke, JP; Classen, DC; Evans, RS; Pestotnik, SL; Stevens, LE, 1993
)
0.29
" Additional computer-generated alerts identified patients who were receiving anticonvulsants concomitantly with I/C or whose therapy reflected dosage changes in the previous 24 hours."( Prospective surveillance of imipenem/cilastatin use and associated seizures using a hospital information system.
Burke, JP; Classen, DC; Evans, RS; Pestotnik, SL; Stevens, LE, 1993
)
0.29
" We believe that appropriate dosing of I/C results in a low rate of associated seizures."( Prospective surveillance of imipenem/cilastatin use and associated seizures using a hospital information system.
Burke, JP; Classen, DC; Evans, RS; Pestotnik, SL; Stevens, LE, 1993
)
0.29
"In a nonblind, randomised, parallel-group study, initial empirical monotherapy with meropenem 1 g intravenously every 8 h was compared to an identical dosage of imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of 66 febrile episodes in 61 adult neutropenic patients."( Empirical monotherapy with meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin for febrile episodes in neutropenic patients.
Böhme, A; Fuhr, HG; Halir, S; Heller, A; Jung, B; Köhler, A; Lips-Schulte, C; Schaumann, R; Shah, PM; Stille, W; Walther, F,
)
0.13
" Plasma and hemofiltrate samples were taken at specified times during one dosing interval, and the concentrations of imipenem and cilastatin were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography."( Pharmacokinetics of imipenem-cilastatin in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration.
Bremer, F; Brune, K; Geisslinger, G; Oelkers, R; Schobel, H; Schüttler, J; Tegeder, I, 1997
)
0.3
" The same dosage regimen resulted in complete bacterial eradication in 88% of the kidneys."( Comparative therapeutic efficacy of clinafloxacin in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa mouse renal abscess model.
Desaty, TM; Griffin, TJ; Heifetz, CL; Sesnie, JC; Shapiro, MA, 1998
)
0.3
"Tazobactam/piperacillin (total daily dosage of 13."( Cost efficacy of tazobactam/piperacillin versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection.
Daschner, F; Dietrich, ES; Ebner, W; Schubert, B, 2001
)
0.31
" In addition, concurrent dosing of BPAA (1 microgram/body) did not reduce the convulsion-inducing dose of PZFX mesilate."( [Drug interactions between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and pazufloxacin mesilate, a new quinolone antibacterial agent for intravenous use: convulsions in mice after intravenous or intracerebroventricular administration].
Fukuda, H; Kawamura, Y, 2002
)
0.31
") infusion at an imipenem dosage of 10 mg/kg (study 1) and 20 mg/kg (study 2)."( Pharmacokinetics of imipenem-cilastatin following intravenous administration in healthy adult horses.
Benson, CE; Boston, RC; Engiles, J; Moate, PJ; Norman, T; Orsini, JA; Poppenga, R, 2005
)
0.33
"When dosed appropriately, imipenem/cilastatin may be used to treat serious infections in critically ill patients with central nervous system (CNS) disorders or injury with minimal seizure risk."( Safety of imipenem/cilastatin in neurocritical care patients.
Brophy, GM; Hoffman, J; Trimble, J, 2009
)
0.35
" Sixty-four patients underwent the imipenem-cilastatin intramuscular test dosing and none of them had a clinical reaction."( Cross-reactivity and tolerability of imipenem in patients with delayed-type, cell-mediated hypersensitivity to beta-lactams.
Altomonte, G; Buonomo, A; Decinti, M; Lombardo, C; Nucera, E; Pascolini, L; Patriarca, G; Schiavino, D, 2009
)
0.35
"To compare clinical outcomes of patients receiving an alternative dosage of meropenem with those of patients receiving imipenem-cilastatin or the traditional dosage of meropenem after failure of or intolerance to cefepime for treatment of febrile neutropenia."( Assessment of an alternative meropenem dosing strategy compared with imipenem-cilastatin or traditional meropenem dosing after cefepime failure or intolerance in adults with neutropenic fever.
Arnold, HM; Augustin, KM; Casabar, E; Dubberke, ER; Hladnik, LM; McKinnon, PS; Reichley, RM; Ritchie, DJ; Westervelt, P, 2009
)
0.35
"Of the 127 patients, 40 received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg every 6 hours between September 1, 2005, and August 31, 2006; 87 patients received meropenem between September 1, 2006, and August 31, 2007: 29 received a traditional dosage of meropenem 1 g every 8 hours, and 58 received an alternative dosage of meropenem 500 mg every 6 hours."( Assessment of an alternative meropenem dosing strategy compared with imipenem-cilastatin or traditional meropenem dosing after cefepime failure or intolerance in adults with neutropenic fever.
Arnold, HM; Augustin, KM; Casabar, E; Dubberke, ER; Hladnik, LM; McKinnon, PS; Reichley, RM; Ritchie, DJ; Westervelt, P, 2009
)
0.35
"The alternative meropenem dosage of 500 mg every 6 hours yielded similar patient outcomes, including time to defervescence, need for additional antibiotics, duration of therapy, and mortality, when compared with the traditional meropenem dosage and imipenem-cilastatin in adults with febrile neutropenia."( Assessment of an alternative meropenem dosing strategy compared with imipenem-cilastatin or traditional meropenem dosing after cefepime failure or intolerance in adults with neutropenic fever.
Arnold, HM; Augustin, KM; Casabar, E; Dubberke, ER; Hladnik, LM; McKinnon, PS; Reichley, RM; Ritchie, DJ; Westervelt, P, 2009
)
0.35
" Monte Carlo simulations using various dosage regimens at steady-state and 30-min and 3-h infusion rates were performed to evaluate the probabilities of attaining 20% (bacteriostatic), 30%, and 40% (maximum kill) time above the MIC."( Comparison of 30-min and 3-h infusion regimens for imipenem/cilastatin and for meropenem evaluated by Monte Carlo simulation.
Bertino, JS; Drusano, GL; Jones, RN; Kinzig-Schippers, M; Lee, LS; Ma, L; Nafziger, AN; Sörgel, F, 2010
)
0.36
" Imipenem would be predicted to be effective for the treatment of antimicrobial resistant bacterial infections in cats at a dosage of 5 mg/kg every 6-8 h (IV, IM), or longer for the SC route."( Pharmacokinetics of imipenem after intravenous, intramuscular and subcutaneous administration to cats.
Albarellos, GA; Denamiel, GA; Landoni, MF; Lupi, MP; Montoya, L; Quaine, PC, 2013
)
0.39
" Data including the dosage and duration of the drug use, occurrence of seizures and mortality outcome was collected from the electronic pharmacy records."( A Retrospective Study on the Incidence of Seizures among Neurosurgical Patients Who Treated with Imipenem/Cilastatin or Meropenem.
Chen, K; Shi, Z; Wang, Q; Wu, Y, 2014
)
0.4
" There was not further risk for patients with pre-existing seizures or creatinine clearance abnormalities when dosed appropriate."( A Retrospective Study on the Incidence of Seizures among Neurosurgical Patients Who Treated with Imipenem/Cilastatin or Meropenem.
Chen, K; Shi, Z; Wang, Q; Wu, Y, 2014
)
0.4
" Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may aid antibiotic prescription and implementation of initial empirical antimicrobial dosage recommendations."( Impact of the introduction of real-time therapeutic drug monitoring on empirical doses of carbapenems in critically ill burn patients.
Decosterd, LA; Eggimann, P; Fournier, A; Marchetti, O; Pagani, JL; Pannatier, A; Que, YA; Revelly, JP; Voirol, P, 2015
)
0.42
"Imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem use and daily empirical dosage at a five-bed burn ICU were analyzed retrospectively."( Impact of the introduction of real-time therapeutic drug monitoring on empirical doses of carbapenems in critically ill burn patients.
Decosterd, LA; Eggimann, P; Fournier, A; Marchetti, O; Pagani, JL; Pannatier, A; Que, YA; Revelly, JP; Voirol, P, 2015
)
0.42
"Real-time carbapenem TDM availability significantly altered the empirical daily dosage of imipenem/cilastatin at our burn ICU."( Impact of the introduction of real-time therapeutic drug monitoring on empirical doses of carbapenems in critically ill burn patients.
Decosterd, LA; Eggimann, P; Fournier, A; Marchetti, O; Pagani, JL; Pannatier, A; Que, YA; Revelly, JP; Voirol, P, 2015
)
0.42
" The significance of using drug combination is that it can reduce drug dosage requirements, reduce the toxic effects of agents and prevent or delay the emergence of drug resistance."( In vitro interactions of ambroxol hydrochloride or amlodipine in combination with antibacterial agents against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.
Li, X; Lu, C; Sun, S; Wang, D; Wang, Y, 2020
)
0.56
" Hence, there is a strong rationale to individualize anti-infective dosing in these patients by using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)."( Determination of Total and Unbound Meropenem, Imipenem/Cilastatin, and Cefoperazone/Sulbactam in Human Plasma: Application for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients.
Dang, ZL; Li, B; Qin, HY; Rao, Z; Wei, YH; Wu, XA; Zhu, L, 2020
)
0.56
"This phase 3, multicenter, open-label, noncomparative study (NCT03293485) evaluated relebactam/imipenem/cilastatin (250 mg/500 mg/500 mg) dosed every 6 h for 5-14 days in Japanese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) or complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including those with secondary sepsis."( The safety and efficacy of relebactam/imipenem/cilastatin in Japanese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection or complicated urinary tract infection: A multicenter, open-label, noncomparative phase 3 study.
Aoyama, N; Bando, H; Brown, M; Kawahara, K; Kikukawa, H; Kohno, S; Paschke, A; Shirakawa, M; Takase, A; Yoneyama, F, 2021
)
0.62
"Antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients is complicated by variations in the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in this group."( Evaluating the usefulness of the estimated glomerular filtration rate for determination of imipenem dosage in critically ill patients.
Becker, P; Chausse, J; Gous, A; Milne, M; Mitton, B; Paruk, F; Said, M, 2022
)
0.72
" Owing to the variability of antibiotic pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients, this task becomes almost impossible when relying on conventional dosing guidelines."( Evaluating the usefulness of the estimated glomerular filtration rate for determination of imipenem dosage in critically ill patients.
Becker, P; Chausse, J; Gous, A; Milne, M; Mitton, B; Paruk, F; Said, M, 2022
)
0.72
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Bioassays (19)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (440)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-199079 (17.95)18.7374
1990's148 (33.64)18.2507
2000's88 (20.00)29.6817
2010's86 (19.55)24.3611
2020's39 (8.86)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 8.28

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be weak demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index8.28 (24.57)
Research Supply Index6.40 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.68 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index0.00 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index0.00 (0.95)

This Compound (8.28)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials130 (27.48%)5.53%
Reviews30 (6.34%)6.00%
Case Studies97 (20.51%)4.05%
Observational3 (0.63%)0.25%
Other213 (45.03%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (14)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase III Non-randomized, Non-controlled, Open Label Clinical Trial to Study the Safety and Efficacy of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (IMI/REL [MK-7655A]) in Japanese Subjects With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection (cIAI) or Complicated Urinary Tra [NCT03293485]Phase 383 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-04Completed
Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Osteomyelitis Treated With Intravenous Antibiotics Versus Intravenous Antibiotics With an Early Switch to Oral Antibiotics [NCT02099240]Early Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-06Terminated(stopped due to Not enough patient enrollment and lack of staffing)
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Active Controlled, Parallel Groups, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous HRS-8427 in the Treatment of Adults With Complicate Urinary Tract Infection, Including Acute Pyelonephritis [NCT06144060]Phase 2126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
Short Versus Extended Antibiotic Treatment With a Carbapenem for High-risk Febrile Neutropenia in Hematology Patients With Fever of Unknown Origin: a Randomized Multicenter Non-inferiority Trial. [NCT02149329]Phase 4276 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Comparative Trial of Intravenous MERREM (Meropenem, ICI 194,660) vs PRIMAXIN I.V. (Imipenem-cilastatin) in the Treatment of Hospitalised Subjects With Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections. [NCT00619710]Phase 31,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-02-28Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Doripenem Compared With Imipenem-Cilastatin in the Treatment of Subjects With Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia [NCT00589693]Phase 3274 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Observed lower cure rates and higher mortality rates in one of the treatment groups.)
A De-Escalating Strategy for Antibiotic Treatment of Pneumonia in The Medical Intensive Care Unit [NCT00445094]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Imipenem Prophylaxis of Infectious Complications in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis [NCT02897206]Phase 498 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Estimate the Efficacy and Safety of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (MK-7655A) Versus Colistimethate Sodium + Imipenem/Cilastatin in Subjects With Imipenem-Resistant Bact [NCT02452047]Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-21Completed
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Sulbactam-ETX2514 in the Treatment of Hospitalized Adults With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Acute Pyelonephritis [NCT03445195]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-17Completed
A Randomised, Double-blind, Dose-finding, Multicenter Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of GSK2251052 Therapy Compared to Imipenem-cilastatin in the Treatment of Adult Subjects With Febrile Complicated Lower Urinary Tract Infections and Acut [NCT01381549]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-28Terminated(stopped due to Microbiological findings of resistance on therapy in patients with complicated urinary tract infection)
Efficacy and Safety of Colistin Based Antibiotic Therapy for Multidrug Resistant Gram Negative Infections in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit [NCT04764058]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-01Enrolling by invitation
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Multicenter, Multinational Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) Compared to Intravenously Administered Imipenem-cilastatin in Patients [NCT06059846]Phase 32,648 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Not yet recruiting
A Single-Dose Study to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics of MK-7655 in Subjects With Impaired Renal Function [NCT01275170]Phase 149 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-28Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00589693 (5) [back to overview]28-day All-cause Mortality Rate
NCT00589693 (5) [back to overview]Clinical Cure Rate at the End-of-treatment (EOT) Visit
NCT00589693 (5) [back to overview]Clinical Cure Rate at the End-of-treatment (EOT) Visit in Patients From Whom a Qualifying P. Aeruginosa Was Isolated at Baseline
NCT00589693 (5) [back to overview]Clinical Cure Rate at the End-of-treatment (EOT) Visit in Patients From Whom at Least 1 of the Gram-negative Qualifying Pneumonia Pathogens (Enterobacteriaceae, P. Aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter Spp) Was Isolated at Baseline
NCT00589693 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Had Emergence of P. Aeruginosa Resistance
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Extraction Coefficient of MK-7655 in Participants With End-stage Renal Diseases Requiring Hemodialysis (ESRD/HD)
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Dialysis Clearance (CLD) of MK-7655 in Participants With End-stage Renal Diseases Requiring Hemodialysis (ESRD/HD)
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With ≥1 Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 2: Plasma AUC0-∞ of Omeprazole as a Probe Substrate of Cytochrome P450 Enzyme (CYP)2C19
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 2: Plasma AUC0-∞ of Midazolam as a Probe Substrate of Cytochrome P450 Enzyme (CYP)3A4
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 2: Plasma AUC0-∞ of Caffeine as a Probe Substrate of Cytochrome P450 Enzyme (CYP)1A2
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: Renal Clearance (CLR) of MK-7655 in Urine
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: VZpred of Imipenem in Combination With MK-7655
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: VZpred of Cilastin in Combination With MK-7655
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: Tmax of Imipenem in Combination With MK-7655
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: Tmax of Cilastin in Combination With MK-7655
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of MK-7655 in Combination With PRIMAXIN®
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: Predicted Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase (VZpred) of MK-7655 in Combination With PRIMAXIN®
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: Predicted Clearance (CLpred) of MK-7655 in Combination With PRIMAXIN®
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: Concentration at End of Infusion (Ceoi) of MK-7655 in Combination With PRIMAXIN®
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: CLR of Imipenem in Urine
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: CLR of Cilastin in Urine
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: CLpred of Imipenem in Combination With MK-7655
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: CLpred of Cilastin in Combination With MK-7655
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: Ceoi of Imipenem in Combination With MK-7655
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: Ceoi of Cilastin in Combination With MK-7655
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: AUC0-inf of Imipenem in Combination With MK-7655
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: AUC0-inf of Cilastin in Combination With MK-7655
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Dosing to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of MK-7655 in Combination With PRIMAXIN®
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: Apparent t½ of Imipenem in Combination With MK-7655
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: Apparent t½ of Cilastin in Combination With MK-7655
NCT01275170 (27) [back to overview]Part 1: Apparent Plasma Half-life (t½) of MK-7655 in Combination With PRIMAXIN®
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Creatine Kinase and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT)
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Creatine Kinase and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT)
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Albumin and Total Protein
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Albumin and Total Protein
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Calcium, Carbon-dioxide (C02) Content/Bicarbonate, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium and Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Calcium, Carbon-dioxide (C02) Content/Bicarbonate, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium and Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Creatinine Clearance, Estimated (CCE)
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Creatinine Clearance, Estimated (CCE)
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Creatinine Clearance, Estimated (CCE)
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin and Total Bilirubin
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin and Total Bilirubin
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters- Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Platelet Count, Total Neutrophils and White Blood Cell Count (WBC)
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters- Hematocrit
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters- Hemoglobin and Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters- Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH)
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters- Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV)
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters- Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count and Reticulocytes
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Heart Rate
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Heart Rate
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Heart Rate
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Respiration Rate
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Respiration Rate
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Respiration Rate
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Temperature
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Temperature
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Temperature
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Summary of Vital Signs: Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Summary of Vital Signs: Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Summary of Vital Signs: Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Clinical Response at the End of IV Therapy Visit, Test of Cure Visit and Late Follow-Up Visit
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Microbiological Response at the End of IV Therapy Visit, Test of Cure Visit and Late Follow-Up Visit
NCT01381549 (34) [back to overview]Therapeutic Response (Combined Clinical and Microbiological Response) at the End of IV Visit and Late Follow-Up Visit
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥1 Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Analysis of Specific AEs With an Incidence of ≥4 Participants in a Treatment Group
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With FCR on Therapy (OTX)
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With FCR at End of Therapy (EOT)
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With FCR at EFU
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favorable Overall Response (FOR)
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality Up to Day 28
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥1 Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥1 Events of Treatment-Emergent Nephrotoxicity
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥1 Drug-Related SAEs
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥1 Drug-Related AEs
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response (FCR) at Day 28
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥1 Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Discontinuing From Study Therapy Due to ≥1 Drug-Related AEs
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Discontinuing From Study Therapy Due to ≥1 AEs
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of cUTI Participants With FMR at EOT
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of cUTI Participants With FMR at EFU
NCT02452047 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of cUTI Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response (FMR) at OTX
NCT03293485 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection (cIAI) Participants With Favorable Clinical Response at End of Therapy Visit
NCT03293485 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT03293485 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing ≥1 Adverse Events (AE)
NCT03293485 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) Participants With Favorable Overall Microbiological Response at Test of Cure Visit
NCT03293485 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) Participants With Favorable Overall Microbiological Response at End of Therapy Visit
NCT03293485 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection (cIAI) Participants With Favorable Clinical Response at Test of Cure Visit
NCT03445195 (3) [back to overview]Microbiologic Eradication
NCT03445195 (3) [back to overview]Clinical Cure
NCT03445195 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Success

28-day All-cause Mortality Rate

Number of deaths which occured up to 28 days of the study period due to all causes (NCT00589693)
Timeframe: Up to 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Doripenem17
Imipenem-cilastatin13

[back to top]

Clinical Cure Rate at the End-of-treatment (EOT) Visit

The number of patients who achieved clinical cure at the EOT visit on Day 10. The patient's were classified as clinical cure if they had resolution of signs and symptoms and objective findings of pneumonia to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy was necessary. (NCT00589693)
Timeframe: End-of-treatment (Day 10 or Day 11)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Doripenem36
Imipenem-cilastatin50

[back to top]

Clinical Cure Rate at the End-of-treatment (EOT) Visit in Patients From Whom a Qualifying P. Aeruginosa Was Isolated at Baseline

The clinical cure rate at the EOT visit in patients, whose bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) or mini-BAL culture results yielded qualifying pneumonia pathogen P. aeruginosa at baseline. (NCT00589693)
Timeframe: End-of-treatment (Day 10 or Day 11)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Doripenem7
Imipenem-cilastatin6

[back to top]

Clinical Cure Rate at the End-of-treatment (EOT) Visit in Patients From Whom at Least 1 of the Gram-negative Qualifying Pneumonia Pathogens (Enterobacteriaceae, P. Aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter Spp) Was Isolated at Baseline

The clinical cure rate at the EOT visit in patients whose BAL or mini-BAL culture results yielded at least 1 of the following Gram-negative qualifying pneumonia pathogens was isolated at baseline: any Enterobacteriaceae, P. aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter Spp. (NCT00589693)
Timeframe: End-of-treatment (Day 10 or Day 11)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Doripenem32
Imipenem-cilastatin34

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Had Emergence of P. Aeruginosa Resistance

Number of patients who had P. aeruginosa isolates with a 4 fold or greater increase in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) at anytime during the study (after the study medication is received) from baseline (NCT00589693)
Timeframe: Up to 6 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Doripenem3
Imipenem-cilastatin6

[back to top]

Extraction Coefficient of MK-7655 in Participants With End-stage Renal Diseases Requiring Hemodialysis (ESRD/HD)

The extraction coefficient of MK-7655 was determined in ESRD/HD participants for 4.5 hours during HD. The formula for calculating extraction coefficient was: Extraction Coefficient = ABS[100*(post-dialyzer concentration - pre-dialyzer concentration) / pre-dialyzer concentration]. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, and 4.5 hours postdose

InterventionExtraction coefficient (Geometric Mean)
1 hour postdose1.5 hours postdose2 hours postdose2.5 hours postdose3.0 hours postdose3.5 hours postdose4 hours postdose4.5 hours postdose
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis7367737173768784

[back to top]

Dialysis Clearance (CLD) of MK-7655 in Participants With End-stage Renal Diseases Requiring Hemodialysis (ESRD/HD)

The CLD of MK-7655 was determined in ESRD/HD participants for 4.5 hours during HD. The formula for calculating CLD was: CLd = (1-Hct)*QB*[(pre-dialyzer concentration - post-dialyzer concentration) / (pre-dialyzer concentration)] where QB=350 mL/min and Hct=hematocrit. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, and 4.5 hours postdose

InterventionmL/min (Geometric Mean)
1 hour postdose1.5 hours postdose2 hours postdose2.5 hours postdose3.0 hours postdose3.5 hours postdose4 hours postdose4.5 hours postdose
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis172158170166171177204198

[back to top]

Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With ≥1 Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug in Part 2 (up to 11 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment28.6
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment16.7
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment16.7
Panel G: ESRD/HD Participants33.3
Healthy Matched Controls (Part 1)0.0
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment (Part 2)33.3
Panel G: ESRD/HD (Part 2)33.3
Healthy Matched Controls (Part 2)0.0

[back to top]

Part 2: Plasma AUC0-∞ of Omeprazole as a Probe Substrate of Cytochrome P450 Enzyme (CYP)2C19

Omeprazole was selected as a substrate of CYP2C19. AUC0-∞ was determined in participants with severe renal impairment and ESRD/HD participants. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2,3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours postdose

InterventionµM*hr (Geometric Mean)
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment9.10
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E6.20
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis4.56
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis4.08
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G5.03

[back to top]

Part 2: Plasma AUC0-∞ of Midazolam as a Probe Substrate of Cytochrome P450 Enzyme (CYP)3A4

Midazolam was selected as a substrate of CYP3A4. AUC0-∞ was determined in participants with severe renal impairment and ESRD/HD participants. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2,3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours postdose

InterventionµM*hr (Geometric Mean)
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment0.130
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E0.121
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis0.0681
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis0.0700
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G0.114

[back to top]

Part 2: Plasma AUC0-∞ of Caffeine as a Probe Substrate of Cytochrome P450 Enzyme (CYP)1A2

Caffeine was selected as a substrate of CYP1A2. AUC0-∞ was determined in participants with severe renal impairment and ESRD/HD participants. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2,3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours postdose

InterventionµM*hr (Geometric Mean)
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment336
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E221
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis190
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis200
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G300

[back to top]

Part 1: Renal Clearance (CLR) of MK-7655 in Urine

CLR represents renal clearance in urine. Urine was collected for 24 hours postdose. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose to 24 hours postdose

InterventionmL/min (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment69.8
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A118
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment38.4
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C110
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment22.3
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E107
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G110

[back to top]

Part 1: VZpred of Imipenem in Combination With MK-7655

Imipenem is 1 of the 2 constituents of PRIMAXIN®. VZpred is the predicted volume of distribution during the terminal phase. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 hours postdose

Interventionliters (L) (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment21.1
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A26.1
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment22.3
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C23.4
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment20.0
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E24.8
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis20.5
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G24.9
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis63.3

[back to top]

Part 1: VZpred of Cilastin in Combination With MK-7655

Cilastin is 1 of the 2 constituents of PRIMAXIN®. VZpred is the predicted volume of distribution during the terminal phase. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 hours postdose

Interventionliters (L) (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment19.2
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A23.9
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment19.4
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C21.4
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment16.9
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E21.2
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis15.9
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G21.0
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis59.1

[back to top]

Part 1: Tmax of Imipenem in Combination With MK-7655

Tmax is the time at which the highest plasma drug concentration was observed. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 hours postdose

Interventionhours (Median)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment0.50
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A0.50
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment0.49
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C0.48
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment0.48
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E0.48
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis0.48
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G0.48
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis0.48

[back to top]

Part 1: Tmax of Cilastin in Combination With MK-7655

Tmax is the time at which the highest plasma drug concentration was observed. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 hours postdose

Interventionhours (Median)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment0.50
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A0.50
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment0.49
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C0.48
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment0.48
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E0.48
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis0.48
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G0.48
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis0.48

[back to top]

Part 1: Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of MK-7655 in Combination With PRIMAXIN®

Tmax is the time at which the highest plasma drug concentration was observed. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 hours postdose

Interventionhours (Median)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment0.50
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A0.50
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment0.50
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C0.49
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment0.48
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E0.48
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis0.48
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G0.48
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis0.48

[back to top]

Part 1: Predicted Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase (VZpred) of MK-7655 in Combination With PRIMAXIN®

VZpred is the predicted volume of distribution during the terminal phase. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 hours postdose

Interventionliters (L) (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment21.4
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A21.6
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment22.2
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C21.9
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment20.1
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E22.4
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis16.2
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G17.0
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis55.7

[back to top]

Part 1: Predicted Clearance (CLpred) of MK-7655 in Combination With PRIMAXIN®

CLpred is the predicted apparent total body clearance of drug. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 hours postdose

InterventionmL/min (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment81.3
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A133
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment52.1
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C114
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment25.3
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E123
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis14.4
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G135
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis76.6

[back to top]

Part 1: Concentration at End of Infusion (Ceoi) of MK-7655 in Combination With PRIMAXIN®

Ceoi is the observed plasma drug concentration at the end of IV infusion. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: At 0.5 hours postdose

InterventionµM (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment22.4
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A20.4
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment23.5
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C22.5
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment23.6
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E18.1
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis53.1
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G22.7
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis19.3

[back to top]

Part 1: CLR of Imipenem in Urine

CLR represents renal clearance in urine. Urine was collected for 24 hours postdose. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose to 24 hours postdose

InterventionmL/min (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment75.0
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A115
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment41.1
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C109
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment17.4
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E104
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G99.1

[back to top]

Part 1: CLR of Cilastin in Urine

CLR represents renal clearance in urine. Urine was collected for 24 hours postdose. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose to 24 hours postdose

InterventionmL/min (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment99.4
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A144
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment59.6
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C136
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment24.5
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E140
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G146

[back to top]

Part 1: CLpred of Imipenem in Combination With MK-7655

Imipenem is 1 of the 2 constituents of PRIMAXIN®. CLpred is the predicted apparent total body clearance of drug. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 hours postdose

InterventionmL/min (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment180
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A253
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment138
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C211
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment87.0
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E218
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis62.5
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G194
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis195

[back to top]

Part 1: CLpred of Cilastin in Combination With MK-7655

Cilastin is 1 of the 2 constituents of PRIMAXIN®. CLpred is the predicted apparent total body clearance of drug. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 hours postdose

InterventionmL/min (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment162
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A259
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment116
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C217
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment38.7
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E217
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis15.0
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G206
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis56.6

[back to top]

Part 1: Ceoi of Imipenem in Combination With MK-7655

Imipenem is 1 of the 2 constituents of PRIMAXIN®. Ceoi is the observed plasma drug concentration at the end of IV infusion. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: At 0.5 hours postdose

InterventionµM (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment40.7
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A35.3
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment45.6
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C42.6
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment46.9
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E35.5
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis103
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G41.8
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis35.9

[back to top]

Part 1: Ceoi of Cilastin in Combination With MK-7655

Cilastin is 1 of the 2 constituents of PRIMAXIN®. Ceoi is the observed plasma drug concentration at the end of IV infusion. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: At 0.5 hours postdose

InterventionµM (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment43.4
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A34.8
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment48.7
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C42.9
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment53.3
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E35.8
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis111
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G44.5
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis41.7

[back to top]

Part 1: AUC0-inf of Imipenem in Combination With MK-7655

Imipenem is 1 of the 2 constituents of PRIMAXIN®. AUC0-∞ is a measure of the mean (extrapolated) plasma drug concentration after dosing to infinity. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 hours postdose

InterventionµM*hr (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment77.3
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A55.0
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment101
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C66.0
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment160
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E63.8
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis223
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G71.8
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis71.2

[back to top]

Part 1: AUC0-inf of Cilastin in Combination With MK-7655

Cilastin is 1 of the 2 constituents of PRIMAXIN®. AUC0-∞ is a measure of the mean (extrapolated) plasma drug concentration after dosing to infinity. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 hours postdose

InterventionµM*hr (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment71.7
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A44.8
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment100.0
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C53.6
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment300
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E53.7
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis777
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G56.5
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis205

[back to top]

Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Dosing to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of MK-7655 in Combination With PRIMAXIN®

AUC0-∞ is a measure of the mean (extrapolated) plasma drug concentration after dosing to infinity. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 hours postdose

InterventionµM*hr (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment73.5
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A45.0
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment115
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C52.3
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment236
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E48.5
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis414
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G44.5
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis78.0

[back to top]

Part 1: Apparent t½ of Imipenem in Combination With MK-7655

Imipenem is 1 of the 2 constituents of PRIMAXIN®. Apparent t½ is the amount of time for the maximum drug concentration to decrease by 50%. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 hours postdose

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment1.54
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A1.24
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment2.18
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C1.40
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment2.78
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E1.32
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis3.24
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G1.21
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis3.20

[back to top]

Part 1: Apparent t½ of Cilastin in Combination With MK-7655

Cilastin is 1 of the 2 constituents of PRIMAXIN®. Apparent t½ is the amount of time for the maximum drug concentration to decrease by 50%. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 hours postdose

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment1.43
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A1.08
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment2.11
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C1.19
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment5.08
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E1.09
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis12.2
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G1.14
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis12.2

[back to top]

Part 1: Apparent Plasma Half-life (t½) of MK-7655 in Combination With PRIMAXIN®

Apparent t½ is the amount of time for the maximum drug concentration to decrease by 50%. (NCT01275170)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 hours postdose

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Panel A: Mild Renal Impairment2.63
Panel B: Healthy Controls to Panel A1.75
Panel C: Moderate Renal Impairment4.51
Panel D: Healthy Controls to Panel C2.10
Panel E: Severe Renal Impairment8.65
Panel F: Healthy Controls to Panel E2.00
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 1 Postdialysis15.6
Panel H: Healthy Controls to Panel G1.79
Panel G: ESRD/HD Period 2 Predialysis10.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Creatine Kinase and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT)

Clinical laboratory parameters included ALT, ALP, AST, Creatine kinase and GGT. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from individual post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline up to Late follow-up visit in ALT, ALP, AST, Creatine kinase and GGT are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

,
InterventionInternational units per Liter (Mean)
ALT: On IV therapy (Day 3)ALT: On IV therapy (Day 5)ALT: On IV therapy (Day 8)ALT: End of IV therapyALT: Test of CureALT: Early Follow-upALT: Late Follow-upALP: On IV therapy (Day 3)ALP: On IV therapy (Day 5)ALP: On IV therapy (Day 8)ALP: End of IV therapyALP: Test of CureALP: Early Follow-upALP: Late Follow-upAST: On IV therapy (Day 3)AST: On IV therapy (Day 5)AST: On IV therapy (Day 8)AST: End of IV therapyAST: Test of CureAST: Early Follow-upAST: Late Follow-upCreatine kinase : On IV therapy (Day 5)Creatine kinase : End of IV therapyCreatine kinase : Test of CureCreatine kinase : Early Follow-upCreatine kinase : Late Follow-upGGT : On IV therapy (Day 5)GGT : End of IV therapyGGT : Test of CureGGT : Early Follow-upGGT : Late Follow-up
GSK2251052 1500 mg10.44.81.518.67.31.0-0.314.34.021.516.36.91.22.34.16.32.013.1-2.3-4.8-3.3-37.8-165.6-156.4-218.2-168.86.528.923.38.31.3
Imipenem-Cilastatin12.813.3-3.021.37.05.84.213.217.7-10.010.214.88.23.619.220.02.015.7-1.41.23.4-26.0-23.718.4-6.00.224.014.03.6-0.8-3.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Creatine Kinase and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT)

Clinical laboratory parameters included ALT, ALP, AST, Creatine kinase and GGT. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from individual post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline up to Late follow-up visit in ALT, ALP, AST, Creatine kinase and GGT are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionInternational units per Liter (Mean)
ALT: On IV therapy (Day 3)ALT: On IV therapy (Day 5)ALT: On IV therapy (Day 8)ALT: On IV therapy (Day 11)ALT: End of IV therapyALT: Test of CureALT: Early Follow-upALT: Late Follow-upALP: On IV therapy (Day 3)ALP: On IV therapy (Day 5)ALP: On IV therapy (Day 8)ALP: On IV therapy (Day 11)ALP: End of IV therapyALP: Test of CureALP: Early Follow-upALP: Late Follow-upAST: On IV therapy (Day 3)AST: On IV therapy (Day 5)AST: On IV therapy (Day 8)AST: On IV therapy (Day 11)AST: End of IV therapyAST: Test of CureAST: Early Follow-upAST: Late Follow-upCreatine kinase : On IV therapy (Day 5)Creatine kinase : On IV therapy (Day 11)Creatine kinase : End of IV therapyCreatine kinase : Test of CureCreatine kinase : Early Follow-upCreatine kinase : Late Follow-upGGT : On IV therapy (Day 5)GGT : On IV therapy (Day 11)GGT : End of IV therapyGGT : Test of CureGGT : Early Follow-upGGT : Late Follow-up
GSK2251052 750 mg5.733.24.02.035.417.54.83.310.811.2-10.0-11.07.410.87.45.75.031.5-2.02.022.01.5-1.23.3-76.04.0-36.0-65.3-41.4-37.841.722.035.816.5-1.4-16.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Albumin and Total Protein

Clinical laboratory parameters included albumin and total protein. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from individual post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline up to Late follow-up visit in albumin and total protein are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

,
InterventionGram per Liter (Mean)
Albumin: On IV therapy (Day 5)Albumin: End of IV therapyAlbumin: Test of CureAlbumin: Early Follow-upAlbumin: Late Follow-upTotal protein: On IV therapy (Day 5)Total protein: End of IV therapyTotal protein: Test of CureTotal protein: Early Follow-upTotal protein: Late Follow-up
GSK2251052 1500 mg-3.8-2.11.73.53.5-5.0-3.32.15.35.3
Imipenem-Cilastatin-0.30.82.63.43.21.03.06.46.44.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Albumin and Total Protein

Clinical laboratory parameters included albumin and total protein. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from individual post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline up to Late follow-up visit in albumin and total protein are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionGram per Liter (Mean)
Albumin: On IV therapy (Day 5)Albumin: On IV therapy (Day 11)Albumin: End of IV therapyAlbumin: Test of CureAlbumin: Early Follow-upAlbumin: Late Follow-upTotal protein: On IV therapy (Day 5)Total protein: On IV therapy (Day 11)Total protein: End of IV therapyTotal protein: Test of CureTotal protein: Early Follow-upTotal protein: Late Follow-up
GSK2251052 750 mg-0.52.01.05.78.27.30.0-5.0-0.45.89.48.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Calcium, Carbon-dioxide (C02) Content/Bicarbonate, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium and Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)

Clinical laboratory parameters included C02 content/bicarbonate, chloride, glucose, potassium, sodium and urea/BUN. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from individual post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline up to Late follow-up visit in C02 content/bicarbonate, chloride, glucose, potassium, sodium and urea/BUN are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

,
InterventionMillimole per Liter (Mean)
Calcium: On IV therapy (Day 5)Calcium: End of IV therapyCalcium: Test of CureCalcium: Early Follow-upCalcium: Late Follow-upC02 content/Bicarbonate: On IV therapy (Day 5)C02 content/Bicarbonate: End of IV therapyC02 content/Bicarbonate: Test of CureC02 content/Bicarbonate: Early Follow-upC02 content/Bicarbonate: Late Follow-upChloride: On IV therapy (Day 5)Chloride: End of IV therapyChloride: Test of CureChloride: Early Follow-upChloride: Late Follow-upGlucose: On IV therapy (Day 5)Glucose: End of IV therapyGlucose: Test of CureGlucose: Early Follow-upGlucose: Late Follow-upPotassium: On IV therapy (Day 5)Potassium: End of IV therapyPotassium: Test of CurePotassium: Early Follow-upPotassium: Late Follow-upSodium: On IV therapy (Day 5)Sodium: End of IV therapySodium: Test of CureSodium: Early Follow-upSodium: Late Follow-upUrea/BUN: On IV therapy (Day 5)Urea/BUN: End of IV therapyUrea/BUN: Test of CureUrea/BUN: Early Follow-upUrea/BUN: Late Follow-up
GSK2251052 1500 mg-0.1120.0710.0960.1200.1150.00.62.70.31.81.83.01.00.5-0.52.251.09-0.110.070.58-0.050.240.400.500.530.31.71.3-0.5-1.2-0.45-1.13-0.730.20-0.33
Imipenem-Cilastatin0.0600.0780.1280.1420.110-2.0-0.31.4-0.41.23.7-0.20.20.02.2-2.00-0.68-0.24-0.78-0.560.370.480.440.420.402.3-0.81.01.02.0-0.97-0.57-0.38-0.34-0.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Calcium, Carbon-dioxide (C02) Content/Bicarbonate, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium and Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)

Clinical laboratory parameters included C02 content/bicarbonate, chloride, glucose, potassium, sodium and urea/BUN. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from individual post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline up to Late follow-up visit in C02 content/bicarbonate, chloride, glucose, potassium, sodium and urea/BUN are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionMillimole per Liter (Mean)
Calcium: On IV therapy (Day 5)Calcium: On IV therapy (Day 11)Calcium: End of IV therapyCalcium: Test of CureCalcium: Early Follow-upCalcium: Late Follow-upC02 content/Bicarbonate: On IV therapy (Day 5)C02 content/Bicarbonate: On IV therapy (Day 11)C02 content/Bicarbonate: End of IV therapyC02 content/Bicarbonate: Test of CureC02 content/Bicarbonate: Early Follow-upC02 content/Bicarbonate: Late Follow-upChloride: On IV therapy (Day 5)Chloride: On IV therapy (Day 11)Chloride: End of IV therapyChloride: Test of CureChloride: Early Follow-upChloride: Late Follow-upGlucose: On IV therapy (Day 5)Glucose: On IV therapy (Day 11)Glucose: End of IV therapyGlucose: Test of CureGlucose: Early Follow-upGlucose: Late Follow-upPotassium: On IV therapy (Day 5)Potassium: On IV therapy (Day 11)Potassium: End of IV therapyPotassium: Test of CurePotassium: Early Follow-upPotassium: Late Follow-upSodium: On IV therapy (Day 5)Sodium: On IV therapy (Day 11)Sodium: End of IV therapySodium: Test of CureSodium: Early Follow-upSodium: Late Follow-upUrea/BUN: On IV therapy (Day 5)Urea/BUN: On IV therapy (Day 11)Urea/BUN: End of IV therapyUrea/BUN: Test of CureUrea/BUN: Early Follow-upUrea/BUN: Late Follow-up
GSK2251052 750 mg0.0820.030-0.0200.2350.2760.243-1.7-3.0-2.4-0.80.00.71.24.01.00.50.60.30.421.50-1.06-0.35-0.80-0.450.520.000.460.780.400.281.24.00.41.81.81.2-0.98-2.50-0.30-0.38-0.64-0.30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Creatinine Clearance, Estimated (CCE)

Clinical laboratory parameters included CCE. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from individual post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline up to Late follow-up visit in CCE are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionMilliliter per minute (Mean)
CCE: Test of CureCCE: Early Follow-up
Imipenem-Cilastatin56.060.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Creatinine Clearance, Estimated (CCE)

Clinical laboratory parameters included CCE. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from individual post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline up to Late follow-up visit in CCE are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionMilliliter per minute (Mean)
CCE: Test of CureCCE: Early Follow-upCCE: Late Follow-up
GSK2251052 750 mg2.01.025.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Creatinine Clearance, Estimated (CCE)

Clinical laboratory parameters included CCE. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from individual post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline up to Late follow-up visit in CCE are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionMilliliter per minute (Mean)
CCE: On IV therapy (Day 5)CCE: Test of CureCCE: Early Follow-upCCE: Late Follow-up
GSK2251052 1500 mg18.013.021.021.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin and Total Bilirubin

Clinical laboratory parameters included creatinine, direct bilirubin and total bilirubin. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from individual post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline up to Late follow-up visit in creatinine, direct bilirubin and total bilirubin are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

,
InterventionMicromole per liter (Mean)
Creatinine: On IV therapy (Day 5)Creatinine: End of IV therapyCreatinine: Test of CureCreatinine: Early Follow-upCreatinine: Late Follow-upTotal bilirubin: On IV therapy (Day 3)Total bilirubin: On IV therapy (Day 5)Total bilirubin: On IV therapy (Day 8)Total bilirubin: End of IV therapyTotal bilirubin: Test of CureTotal bilirubin: Early Follow-upTotal bilirubin: Late Follow-up
GSK2251052 1500 mg-5.78-11.26-9.662.88-5.22-4.9-3.5-4.5-5.6-4.7-4.5-4.8
Imipenem-Cilastatin-11.97-8.70-8.54-4.56-5.22-7.2-7.3-1.0-5.5-6.4-6.0-5.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters- Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin and Total Bilirubin

Clinical laboratory parameters included creatinine, direct bilirubin and total bilirubin. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from individual post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline up to Late follow-up visit in creatinine, direct bilirubin and total bilirubin are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionMicromole per liter (Mean)
Creatinine: On IV therapy (Day 5)Creatinine: On IV therapy (Day 11)Creatinine: End of IV therapyCreatinine: Test of CureCreatinine: Early Follow-upCreatinine: Late Follow-upTotal bilirubin: On IV therapy (Day 3)Total bilirubin: On IV therapy (Day 5)Total bilirubin: On IV therapy (Day 8)Total bilirubin: On IV therapy (Day 11)Total bilirubin: End of IV therapyTotal bilirubin: Test of CureTotal bilirubin: Early Follow-upTotal bilirubin: Late Follow-up
GSK2251052 750 mg-4.20-1.50-0.24-2.17-3.904.43-7.5-7.0-5.0-1.0-8.2-7.7-6.2-5.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters- Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Platelet Count, Total Neutrophils and White Blood Cell Count (WBC)

Hematology parameters included basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelet count, total neutrophils and WBC. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from individual post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline up to Late follow-up visit in basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelet count, total neutrophils and WBC are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

,,
InterventionGigacells per Liter (Mean)
Basophils: End of IV therapyBasophils: Late Follow-upEosinophils: End of IV therapyEosinophils: Late Follow-upLymphocytes: End of IV therapyLymphocytes: Late Follow-upMonocytes: End of IV therapyMonocytes: Late Follow-upPlatelet count: End of IV therapyPlatelet count: Late Follow-upTotal neutrophils: End of IV therapyTotal neutrophils: Late Follow-upWBC count: End of IV therapyWBC count: Late Follow-up
GSK2251052 1500 mg0.0180.0200.0960.0670.5140.774-0.256-0.23083.245.4-6.695-7.737-6.30-7.11
GSK2251052 750 mg0.0280.0220.2740.0930.5800.687-0.188-0.380141.048.8-8.178-6.765-7.48-6.33
Imipenem-Cilastatin0.0140.0160.0900.0860.5960.436-0.442-0.186105.439.8-4.656-7.902-4.36-7.54

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters- Hematocrit

Hematology parameters included hematocrit. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from individual post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline up to Late follow-up visit in hematocrit are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

,,
InterventionFraction (Mean)
End of IV therapyLate Follow-up
GSK2251052 1500 mg-0.0155-0.0007
GSK2251052 750 mg-0.01400.0373
Imipenem-Cilastatin-0.0120-0.0038

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters- Hemoglobin and Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)

Hematology parameters included hemoglobin and MCHC. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from individual post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline up to Late follow-up visit in hemoglobin and MCHC are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

,,
InterventionGram per Liter (Mean)
Hemoglobin: End of IV therapyHemoglobin: Late Follow-upMCHC: End of IV therapyMCHC: Late Follow-up
GSK2251052 1500 mg-5.5-2.1-1.8-5.0
GSK2251052 750 mg-3.011.04.0-3.0
Imipenem-Cilastatin-2.5-0.64.21.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters- Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH)

Hematology parameters included MCH. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from individual post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline up to Late follow-up visit in MCH are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

,,
InterventionPicograms (Mean)
End of IV therapyLate Follow-up
GSK2251052 1500 mg-0.60-0.89
GSK2251052 750 mg-0.60-0.85
Imipenem-Cilastatin-0.07-0.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters- Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV)

Hematology parameters included MCV. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from individual post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline up to Late follow-up visit in MCV are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

,,
InterventionFemtoliters (Mean)
End of IV therapyLate Follow-up
GSK2251052 1500 mg-1.3-1.3
GSK2251052 750 mg-3.0-2.2
Imipenem-Cilastatin-1.0-0.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters- Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count and Reticulocytes

Hematology parameters included RBC count and reticulocytes. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from individual post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline up to Late follow-up visit in RBC count and reticulocytes are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

,,
InterventionTrillion cells per liter (Mean)
RBC: End of IV therapyRBC: Late Follow-upReticulocytes: End of IV therapyReticulocytes: Late Follow-up
GSK2251052 1500 mg-0.100.07-0.0312-0.0092
GSK2251052 750 mg-0.100.52-0.0331-0.0466
Imipenem-Cilastatin-0.080.02-0.00720.0080

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

Twelve lead ECGs were obtained during the study using an ECG machine that automatically measured PR, QRS, QT, and QT corrected by Bazett's formula (QTcB), QT corrected by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) intervals. Twelve lead ECGs were performed with the participant in a semi-supine position having rested in this position for at least 10 minutes beforehand. Measurements that deviated substantially from previous readings were repeated immediately. Three measurements were taken at pre-dose on Day 1 at least 5 min apart. One additional ECG measurement was taken after completion of the first infusion of study medication. Two ECG measurements (pre and post-1st infusion of the day) were taken on Day 4 while the participant was on IV therapy. When there was an abnormal finding, two more were taken and the mean PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval and QTcB were calculated from automated ECG readings. One ECG measurement was taken at the early safety follow-up visit. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Up to Late Follow-up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 1: Pre-dose 1Day 1: Pre-dose 2Day 1: Pre-dose 3Day 1: Post-doseDay 4 (on IV treatment): Pre-doseDay 4 (on IV treatment): Post-doseEarly Follow-upWithdrawal
GSK2251052 1500 mg44254330
GSK2251052 750 mg02112300
Imipenem-Cilastatin22332220

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. For marketed medicinal products, this also includes failure to produce expected benefits (i.e., lack of efficacy), abuse or misuse. SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Up to 28 days post-therapy

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AESAE
GSK2251052 1500 mg62
GSK2251052 750 mg51
Imipenem-Cilastatin50

[back to top]

Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Heart Rate

Vital sign measurements included heart rate. Measurements that deviated substantially from previous readings were repeated immediately. Mean heart rate is presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Up to Late Follow-up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)On IV therapy (Day 2)On IV therapy (Day 3)On IV therapy (Day 4)On IV therapy (Day 5)On IV therapy (Day 6)On IV therapy (Day 7)On IV therapy (Day 8)On IV therapy (Day 9)End of IV therapyTest of CureEarly Follow-upLate Follow-up
GSK2251052 1500 mg99.383.080.681.080.392.088.587.580.082.873.674.071.8

[back to top]

Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Heart Rate

Vital sign measurements included heart rate. Measurements that deviated substantially from previous readings were repeated immediately. Mean heart rate is presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Up to Late Follow-up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)On IV therapy (Day 2)On IV therapy (Day 3)On IV therapy (Day 4)On IV therapy (Day 5)On IV therapy (Day 6)On IV therapy (Day 7)On IV therapy (Day 8)On IV therapy (Day 9)On IV therapy (Day 10)End of IV therapyTest of CureEarly Follow-upLate Follow-up
Imipenem-Cilastatin87.781.581.473.668.274.878.382.085.086.071.074.665.878.2

[back to top]

Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Heart Rate

Vital sign measurements included heart rate. Measurements that deviated substantially from previous readings were repeated immediately. Mean heart rate is presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Up to Late Follow-up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)On IV therapy (Day 2)On IV therapy (Day 3)On IV therapy (Day 4)On IV therapy (Day 5)On IV therapy (Day 6)On IV therapy (Day 7)On IV therapy (Day 8)On IV therapy (Day 9)On IV therapy (Day 10)On IV therapy (Day 11)On IV therapy (Day 12)On IV therapy (Day 13)On IV therapy (Day 14)End of IV therapyTest of CureEarly Follow-upLate Follow-up
GSK2251052 750 mg85.878.277.878.572.389.081.088.084.091.0100.084.090.092.072.874.572.576.8

[back to top]

Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Respiration Rate

Vital sign measurements included respiratory rate. Measurements that deviated substantially from previous readings were repeated immediately. Mean respiration rate are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Up to Late Follow-up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionBreaths/minute (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)On IV therapy (Day 2)On IV therapy (Day 3)On IV therapy (Day 4)On IV therapy (Day 5)On IV therapy (Day 6)On IV therapy (Day 7)On IV therapy (Day 8)On IV therapy (Day 9)End of IV therapyTest of CureEarly Follow-upLate Follow-up
GSK2251052 1500 mg19.618.116.617.316.617.016.515.016.015.815.515.916.0

[back to top]

Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Respiration Rate

Vital sign measurements included respiratory rate. Measurements that deviated substantially from previous readings were repeated immediately. Mean respiration rate are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Up to Late Follow-up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionBreaths/minute (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)On IV therapy (Day 2)On IV therapy (Day 3)On IV therapy (Day 4)On IV therapy (Day 5)On IV therapy (Day 6)On IV therapy (Day 7)On IV therapy (Day 8)On IV therapy (Day 9)On IV therapy (Day 10)End of IV therapyTest of CureEarly Follow-upLate Follow-up
Imipenem-Cilastatin17.316.816.817.818.816.017.320.022.020.016.418.216.416.6

[back to top]

Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Respiration Rate

Vital sign measurements included respiratory rate. Measurements that deviated substantially from previous readings were repeated immediately. Mean respiration rate are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Up to Late Follow-up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionBreaths/minute (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)On IV therapy (Day 2)On IV therapy (Day 3)On IV therapy (Day 4)On IV therapy (Day 5)On IV therapy (Day 6)On IV therapy (Day 7)On IV therapy (Day 8)On IV therapy (Day 9)On IV therapy (Day 10)On IV therapy (Day 11)On IV therapy (Day 12)On IV therapy (Day 13)On IV therapy (Day 14)End of IV therapyTest of CureEarly Follow-upLate Follow-up
GSK2251052 750 mg17.315.014.215.514.516.016.016.014.017.015.016.014.014.016.014.015.313.4

[back to top]

Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Temperature

Vital sign measurements included temperature (oral, tympanic or rectal). Measurements that deviated substantially from previous readings were repeated immediately. Temperature was assessed as normal hospital practice dictated and the maximum daily temperature was recorded in the electronic case report form (eCRF). (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Up to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionCelsius (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)On IV therapy (Day 2)On IV therapy (Day 3)On IV therapy (Day 4)On IV therapy (Day 5)On IV therapy (Day 6)On IV therapy (Day 7)On IV therapy (Day 8)On IV therapy (Day 9)End of IV therapyTest of CureEarly Follow-upLate Follow-up
GSK2251052 1500 mg38.4137.3036.7936.7136.5936.9036.9536.8036.8036.7535.9835.9936.08

[back to top]

Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Temperature

Vital sign measurements included temperature (oral, tympanic or rectal). Measurements that deviated substantially from previous readings were repeated immediately. Temperature was assessed as normal hospital practice dictated and the maximum daily temperature was recorded in the electronic case report form (eCRF). (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Up to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionCelsius (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)On IV therapy (Day 2)On IV therapy (Day 3)On IV therapy (Day 4)On IV therapy (Day 5)On IV therapy (Day 6)On IV therapy (Day 7)On IV therapy (Day 8)On IV therapy (Day 9)On IV therapy (Day 10)End of IV therapyTest of CureEarly Follow-upLate Follow-up
Imipenem-Cilastatin38.3037.3037.7437.3836.9636.4036.9336.5036.5036.5036.3836.1436.2836.00

[back to top]

Summary of Vital Signs- Mean Temperature

Vital sign measurements included temperature (oral, tympanic or rectal). Measurements that deviated substantially from previous readings were repeated immediately. Temperature was assessed as normal hospital practice dictated and the maximum daily temperature was recorded in the electronic case report form (eCRF). (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Up to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionCelsius (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)On IV therapy (Day 2)On IV therapy (Day 3)On IV therapy (Day 4)On IV therapy (Day 5)On IV therapy (Day 6)On IV therapy (Day 7)On IV therapy (Day 8)On IV therapy (Day 9)On IV therapy (Day 10)On IV therapy (Day 11)On IV therapy (Day 12)On IV therapy (Day 13)On IV therapy (Day 14)End of IV therapyTest of CureEarly Follow-upLate Follow-up
GSK2251052 750 mg38.0836.9736.7536.6036.2737.0036.2036.8036.5037.0037.0036.8036.2036.8036.1836.2536.2336.40

[back to top]

Summary of Vital Signs: Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

Vital sign measurements included SBP and DBP (supine or semi-supine). Measurements that deviated substantially from previous readings were repeated immediately. Mean SBP and DBP are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Up to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
SBP: Baseline (Day 1)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 2)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 3)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 4)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 5)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 6)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 7)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 8)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 9)SBP: End of IV therapySBP: Test of CureSBP: Early Follow-upSBP: Late Follow-upDBP: Baseline (Day 1)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 2)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 3)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 4)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 5)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 6)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 7)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 8)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 9)DBP: End of IV therapyDBP: Test of CureDBP: Early Follow-upDBP: Late Follow-up
GSK2251052 1500 mg131.9125.4126.6127.0126.6125.5125.0125.0130.0116.1126.9120.1117.677.369.072.179.579.781.070.069.080.069.470.672.067.5

[back to top]

Summary of Vital Signs: Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

Vital sign measurements included SBP and DBP (supine or semi-supine). Measurements that deviated substantially from previous readings were repeated immediately. Mean SBP and DBP are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Up to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
SBP: Baseline (Day 1)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 2)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 3)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 4)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 5)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 6)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 7)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 8)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 9)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 10)SBP: End of IV therapySBP: Test of CureSBP: Early Follow-upSBP: Late Follow-upDBP: Baseline (Day 1)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 2)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 3)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 4)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 5)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 6)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 7)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 8)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 9)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 10)DBP: End of IV therapyDBP: Test of CureDBP: Early Follow-upDBP: Late Follow-up
Imipenem-Cilastatin120.0120.0123.8124.2116.8115.0116.7110.0105.0110.0117.5126.4123.8116.666.570.371.269.667.072.567.770.065.070.071.571.868.865.0

[back to top]

Summary of Vital Signs: Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

Vital sign measurements included SBP and DBP (supine or semi-supine). Measurements that deviated substantially from previous readings were repeated immediately. Mean SBP and DBP are presented. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: Up to Late Follow up Visit (21 to 28 days post-IV therapy)

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
SBP: Baseline (Day 1)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 2)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 3)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 4)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 5)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 6)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 7)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 8)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 9)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 10)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 11)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 12)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 13)SBP: On IV therapy (Day 14)SBP: End of IV therapySBP: Test of CureSBP: Early Follow-upSBP: Late Follow-upDBP: Baseline (Day 1)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 2)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 3)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 4)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 5)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 6)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 7)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 8)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 9)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 10)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 11)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 12)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 13)DBP: On IV therapy (Day 14)DBP: End of IV therapyDBP: Test of CureDBP: Early Follow-upDBP: Late Follow-up
GSK2251052 750 mg129.7131.2123.8137.8135.2150.0165.0170.0161.0140.0155.0140.0130.0152.0130.0131.3128.0148.068.078.377.285.583.890.085.090.095.069.069.075.080.069.074.082.273.887.7

[back to top]

Clinical Response at the End of IV Therapy Visit, Test of Cure Visit and Late Follow-Up Visit

Clinical response was a combination of clinical success and clinical failure. In clinical success, participants showed no signs and symptoms of pyelonephritis and lower complicated urinary tract infection and antibiotics are not used for the same. In clinical failure, there is reappearance of signs and symptoms of and lower complicated urinary tract infection and participant required antibiotics for the same. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: End of IV therapy (0-24 hours post-therapy), Test of Cure Visit (5 to 9 days post-IV therapy) and Late Follow-up (21-28 days post-therapy)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
End of IV therapy72057612End of IV therapy72057610End of IV therapy72057611Test of Cure72057612Test of Cure72057611Test of Cure72057610Late Follow-up72057612Late Follow-up72057610Late Follow-up72057611
Clinical SuccessClinical Failure
GSK2251052 750 mg4
Imipenem-Cilastatin5
GSK2251052 750 mg2
Imipenem-Cilastatin0
GSK2251052 1500 mg6
Imipenem-Cilastatin4
GSK2251052 1500 mg2
Imipenem-Cilastatin1
GSK2251052 750 mg3
Imipenem-Cilastatin2
Imipenem-Cilastatin3

[back to top]

Microbiological Response at the End of IV Therapy Visit, Test of Cure Visit and Late Follow-Up Visit

Microbiological response involved both microbiological success and microbiological failure. A reduction in the uropathogens in the urine culture and no growth on blood culture was termed as microbiological success. Increase in the uropathogens in the urine culture and pathogens identified in the blood culture or use of antibacterials other than study treatments were classified as microbiological failures. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: End of IV therapy (0-24 hours post-therapy), Test of Cure Visit (5 to 9 days post-IV therapy) and Late Follow-up (21-28 days post-therapy)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
End of IV therapy72057612End of IV therapy72057610End of IV therapy72057611Test of Cure72057612Test of Cure72057610Test of Cure72057611Late Folllow-up72057612Late Folllow-up72057610Late Folllow-up72057611
Microbiological SuccessMicrobiological Failure
Imipenem-Cilastatin5
GSK2251052 750 mg3
Imipenem-Cilastatin0
GSK2251052 750 mg1
GSK2251052 1500 mg5
Imipenem-Cilastatin1
GSK2251052 750 mg5
GSK2251052 1500 mg3
Imipenem-Cilastatin4
GSK2251052 750 mg2
GSK2251052 1500 mg6
GSK2251052 750 mg4
GSK2251052 1500 mg2

[back to top]

Therapeutic Response (Combined Clinical and Microbiological Response) at the End of IV Visit and Late Follow-Up Visit

The therapeutic response was the combination of a participant's clinical and microbiological response. It was assessed at the Test of Cure visit in participants who have a qualifying Gram-negative uropathogen at Baseline and have had a minimum of 5 days of IV therapy. Therapeutic response was a measure of the overall efficacy response, and a therapeutic success referred to participants who have been deemed both a 'clinical success' and a 'microbiological success'. All other combinations (other than 'clinical success' + 'microbiological success') were deemed failures for therapeutic response. (NCT01381549)
Timeframe: End of IV therapy (0-24 hours post-therapy) and Late Follow-up (21-28 days post-therapy)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
End of IV therapy72057612End of IV therapy72057611End of IV therapy72057610Late Follow-up72057612Late Follow-up72057610Late Follow-up72057611
Therapeutic FailureTherapeutic Success
GSK2251052 750 mg3
GSK2251052 1500 mg5
Imipenem-Cilastatin5
GSK2251052 1500 mg3
Imipenem-Cilastatin0
GSK2251052 750 mg2
GSK2251052 1500 mg6
Imipenem-Cilastatin1
GSK2251052 750 mg4
GSK2251052 1500 mg2
Imipenem-Cilastatin4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥1 Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)

The percentage of participants in Groups 1, 2, and 3 having ECIs within 2 categories was determined. Category 1 ECIs included post-baseline laboratory values of an elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) value that is ≥3x upper limit of normal (ULN) and an elevated total bilirubin value that is ≥2x ULN and (at the same time) an alkaline phosphatase value that is ≤2x ULN. Category 2 ECIs included a confirmed elevated AST or ALT value that is ≥5x ULN. Statistical analysis included only Groups 1 and 2 as indicated by the protocol. (NCT02452047)
Timeframe: Up to Day 35 (up to 14 days after completing study treatment)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Category 1 ECICategory 2 ECI
Group 1: Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam0.00.0
Group 2: Colistimethate Sodium + Imipenem+Cilastatin12.512.5

[back to top]

Analysis of Specific AEs With an Incidence of ≥4 Participants in a Treatment Group

The percentage of participants experiencing AEs that occurred in ≥4 participants within either Group 1 or Group 2 was assessed. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Statistical analysis included only Groups 1 and 2 as indicated by the protocol; Group 3 had <4 participants and therefore no data are presented. (NCT02452047)
Timeframe: Up to Day 35 (up to 14 days after completing study treatment)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
PyrexiaBlood creatinine increased
Group 1: Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam12.90.0
Group 2: Colistimethate Sodium + Imipenem+Cilastatin12.525.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With FCR on Therapy (OTX)

"The percentage of participants with a FCR at OTX was determined for Groups 1 and 2. FCR at OTX was defined as improved. Improved was defined as all or most pretherapy signs and symptoms of index infection have improved or resolved, and (for cIAI participants) no unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures have been performed." (NCT02452047)
Timeframe: OTX (Day 3)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Group 1: Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam81.0
Group 2: Colistimethate Sodium + Imipenem+Cilastatin40.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With FCR at End of Therapy (EOT)

"The percentage of participants with FCR at EOT was determined for Groups 1 and 2. FCR at EOT was defined as cure or improved. Cure was defined as all pretherapy signs and symptoms of index infection resolved or returned to preinfection status, and no additional IV antibiotic therapy required, and (for cIAI participants) no unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures performed. Improved was defined as all or most pretherapy signs and symptoms of index infection have improved or resolved, and (for cIAI participants) no unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures have been performed." (NCT02452047)
Timeframe: At EOT (up to Day 21)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Group 1: Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam90.5
Group 2: Colistimethate Sodium + Imipenem+Cilastatin60.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With FCR at EFU

"The percentage of participants with FCR at EFU was determined for Groups 1 and 2. FCR at EFU was defined as sustained cure or cure. Sustained cure (for participants with cure response at the prior visit) was defined as all pretherapy signs and symptoms of index infection resolved with no evidence of resurgence and no additional antibiotic therapy required, and (for cIAI participants) no unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures have been performed. Cure (for participants with improved response at EOT visit) was defined as all pretherapy signs and symptoms of index infection resolved or returned to preinfection status, and no additional IV antibiotic therapy required, and (for cIAI participants) no unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures performed." (NCT02452047)
Timeframe: EFU (Between Day 10 and Day 30 [5 to 9 Days after EOT])

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Group 1: Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam81.0
Group 2: Colistimethate Sodium + Imipenem+Cilastatin50.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Overall Response (FOR)

The percentage of participants with FOR was determined for Groups 1 and 2. FOR was determined based on clinically relevant outcomes for the primary site of infection as follows: HABP/VABP: survival through Day 28; cIAI: favorable clinical response (all pretherapy symptoms of index infection resolved with no evidence of resurgence, no additional antibiotic therapy required, and no unplanned surgical or percutaneous drainage procedures) at Day 28; cUTI: favorable composite clinical response (all pretherapy symptoms of index infection resolved with no evidence of resurgence, no additional antibiotic therapy required) and microbiological response (urine culture shows sustained eradication of the baseline uropathogen [e.g., ≥10^5 CFU/mL at study entry is reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL]) at Early Follow-up (EFU). (NCT02452047)
Timeframe: Up to Day 30 (up to 9 days after completing study treatment)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Group 1: Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam71.4
Group 2: Colistimethate Sodium + Imipenem+Cilastatin70.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality Up to Day 28

The percentage of participants with all-cause mortality up to Day 28 was determined for Groups 1 and 2. (NCT02452047)
Timeframe: Up to Day 28

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Group 1: Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam9.5
Group 2: Colistimethate Sodium + Imipenem+Cilastatin30.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥1 Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

The percentage of participants in Groups 1, 2, and 3 experiencing ≥1 SAEs during treatment and 14-day follow-up was determined. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant injury/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or is an other important medical event. Statistical analysis included only Groups 1 and 2 as indicated by the protocol. (NCT02452047)
Timeframe: Up to Day 35 (up to 14 days after completing study treatment)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Group 1: Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam9.7
Group 2: Colistimethate Sodium + Imipenem+Cilastatin31.3
Group 3: Open-Label Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥1 Events of Treatment-Emergent Nephrotoxicity

"Treatment-emergent nephrotoxity was assessed in Groups 1 and 2 as indicated by the protocol (Group 3 was not included). Nephrotoxicity for participants with normal baseline serum creatinine levels (<1.2 mg/dL) was defined as doubling of serum creatinine to >1.2 mg/dL or reduction in creatinine clearance (ClCR) of ≥50%. Nephrotoxicity for participants with pre-existing renal dysfunction (baseline serum creatinine level ≥1.2 mg/dL) was defined as increase in serum creatinine by ≥1 mg/dL or reduction from baseline ClCR of ≥20% or need for renal replacement therapy (RRT)." (NCT02452047)
Timeframe: Up to Day 35 (up to 14 days after completing study treatment)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Group 1: Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam10.3
Group 2: Colistimethate Sodium + Imipenem+Cilastatin56.3

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response (FCR) at Day 28

"The percentage of participants with FCR at Day 28 was determined for Groups 1 and 2. FCR at Day 28 was defined as sustained cure or cure. Sustained cure (for participants with cure response at the prior visit) was defined as all pretherapy signs and symptoms of index infection resolved with no evidence of resurgence and no additional antibiotic therapy required, and (for cIAI participants) no unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures have been performed. Cure (for participants with improved response at EOT visit) was defined as all pretherapy signs and symptoms of index infection resolved or returned to preinfection status, and no additional IV antibiotic therapy required, and (for cIAI participants) no unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures performed." (NCT02452047)
Timeframe: Day 28

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Group 1: Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam71.4
Group 2: Colistimethate Sodium + Imipenem+Cilastatin40.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥1 Adverse Events (AEs)

The percentage of participants in Groups 1, 2, and 3 experiencing ≥1 AEs during treatment and 14-day follow-up was determined. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Statistical analysis included only Groups 1 and 2 as indicated by the protocol. (NCT02452047)
Timeframe: Up to Day 35 (up to 14 days after completing study treatment)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Group 1: Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam71.0
Group 2: Colistimethate Sodium + Imipenem+Cilastatin81.3
Group 3: Open-Label Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam100.0

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants Discontinuing From Study Therapy Due to ≥1 AEs

The percentage of participants in Group 1, 2, and 3 discontinuing from study drug due to ≥1 AEs during the treatment period was determined. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Statistical analysis included only Groups 1 and 2 as indicated by the protocol. (NCT02452047)
Timeframe: Up to Day 21

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Group 1: Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam0.0
Group 2: Colistimethate Sodium + Imipenem+Cilastatin18.8
Group 3: Open-Label Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam33.3

[back to top]

Percentage of cUTI Participants With FMR at EOT

"The percentage of participants with FMR at EOT was determined for participants with cUTI in Groups 1 and 2. FMR was defined as urine culture results at EOT showing eradication (i.e., ≥10^5 CFU/mL at baseline was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL at EOT) or sustained eradication (i.e., ≥10^5 CFU/mL at baseline that was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL previously remained <10^4 CFU/mL at EOT) of the uropathogen." (NCT02452047)
Timeframe: At EOT (up to Day 21)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Group 1: Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam100.0
Group 2: Colistimethate Sodium + Imipenem+Cilastatin100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of cUTI Participants With FMR at EFU

"The percentage of participants with FMR at EFU was determined for participants with cUTI in Groups 1 and 2. FMR was defined as urine culture results at EFU showing sustained eradication (i.e., ≥10^5 CFU/mL at baseline that was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL previously remained <10^4 CFU/mL at EFU) of the uropathogen." (NCT02452047)
Timeframe: EFU (Between Day 10 and Day 30 [5 to 9 Days after EOT])

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Group 1: Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam72.7
Group 2: Colistimethate Sodium + Imipenem+Cilastatin100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of cUTI Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response (FMR) at OTX

"The percentage of participants with FMR at OTX was determined for participants with cUTI in Groups 1 and 2. FMR was defined as urine culture results at OTX showing eradication (i.e., ≥10^5 colony forming units [CFU]/mL at baseline was reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL at OTX) of the uropathogen." (NCT02452047)
Timeframe: OTX (Day 3)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Group 1: Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam100.0
Group 2: Colistimethate Sodium + Imipenem+Cilastatin100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection (cIAI) Participants With Favorable Clinical Response at End of Therapy Visit

"The percentage of participants with cIAI who display a favorable clinical response at End of Therapy visit was presented. Per protocol, a subset of the cIAI/cUTI study arm was analyzed: only participants with cIAI were evaluated because clinical response is primarily relevant to cIAI. Favorable clinical response is a rating of cure or improved as determined by the investigator at the End of Therapy Visit. Cure is defined as: all pretherapy signs and symptoms of the index infection(s) have resolved (or returned to preinfection status) AND no additional intravenous antibiotic therapy is required AND no unplanned surgical or percutaneous drainage procedures have been performed. Improved is defined as: All or most pretherapy signs and symptoms of the index infection(s) have improved or resolved (or returned to preinfection status) AND no additional intravenous antibiotic therapy is required AND no unplanned surgical or percutaneous drainage procedures have been performed." (NCT03293485)
Timeframe: Between Day 5 and Day 14 (End of Therapy Visit)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
cIAI85.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event (AE)

The percentage of participants who discontinued from study medication due to an adverse event was calculated. An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease (new or worsening) temporally associated with the use of study therapy, regardless of whether or not a causal relationship with the study therapy could be determined. (NCT03293485)
Timeframe: Up to 14 days (End of Therapy Visit)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
cIAI/cUTI4.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing ≥1 Adverse Events (AE)

The percentage of participants experiencing ≥1 AE was calculated. An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease (new or worsening) temporally associated with the use of study therapy, regardless of whether or not a causal relationship with the study therapy could be determined. (NCT03293485)
Timeframe: Up to 28 days

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
cIAI/cUTI74.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) Participants With Favorable Overall Microbiological Response at Test of Cure Visit

The percentage of participants with cUTI who display a favorable Overall Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure visit was calculated. Per protocol, only a subset of the cIAI/cUTI study arm was analyzed: only participants with cUTI were evaluated because the microbiological response evaluation is primarily relevant to cUTI. A favorable Overall Microbiological Response is defined as a urine culture taken at the Test of Cure visit still showing eradication (e.g., ≥10^5 CFU/mL is reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL) of all uropathogens found at study entry. (NCT03293485)
Timeframe: Between Day 10 and Day 23 (Test of Cure Visit)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
cUTI59.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) Participants With Favorable Overall Microbiological Response at End of Therapy Visit

The percentage of participants with cUTI who display a favorable Overall Microbiological Response at the End of Therapy visit was calculated. Per protocol, only a subset of the cIAI/cUTI study arm was analyzed: only participants with cUTI were evaluated because the microbiological response evaluation is primarily relevant to cUTI. A favorable Overall Microbiological Response is defined as a urine culture taken at the End of Therapy Visit showing eradication (e.g., ≥10^5 CFU/mL is reduced to <10^4 CFU/mL) of all uropathogens found at study entry. (NCT03293485)
Timeframe: Between Day 5 and Day 14 (End of Therapy Visit)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
cUTI100

[back to top]

Percentage of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection (cIAI) Participants With Favorable Clinical Response at Test of Cure Visit

"The percentage of participants with cIAI who display a favorable Clinical Response at the Test of Cure visit was calculated. Per protocol, only a subset of the cIAI/cUTI study arm was analyzed: only participants with cIAI were evaluated because the clinical response evaluation is primarily relevant to cIAI. A favorable clinical response is a rating of cure as determined by the investigator at the Test of Cure Visit. Cure is defined as: all pretherapy signs and symptoms of the index infection(s) have resolved (or returned to preinfection status) AND no additional intravenous antibiotic therapy is required AND no unplanned surgical or percutaneous drainage procedures have been performed." (NCT03293485)
Timeframe: Between Day 10 and Day 23 (Test of Cure Visit)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
cIAI82.1

[back to top]

Microbiologic Eradication

Proportion of patients with a response of microbiologic eradication for the m-MITT(microbiologically modified intent to treat) and ME(microbiologically evaluable) populations at the TOC visit (NCT03445195)
Timeframe: Baseline to day 21

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
m-MITT populationME population
Placebo + Imipenem/Cilastatin1717
Sulbactam-ETX2514 (ETX2514SUL) + Imipenem/Cilastatin3736

[back to top]

Clinical Cure

Proportion of patients with a response of clinical cure for the MITT(modified intent to treat), m-MITT (microbiologically modified intent to treat), CE(clinically evaluable), and ME(microbiologically evaluable) populations at the TOC(test of cure) visit. (NCT03445195)
Timeframe: Baseline to day 21

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MITT populationm-MITT populationCE populationME population
Placebo + Imipenem/Cilastatin27212721
Sulbactam-ETX2514 (ETX2514SUL) + Imipenem/Cilastatin52465245

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Success

The primary efficacy endpoint for this study was the proportion of patients with an overall success (clinical cure and micro-biologic eradication) for the m-MITT (Micro-biologically Modified Intent-to-Treat) Population at the TOC Visit. (NCT03445195)
Timeframe: From baseline through day 21

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sulbactam-ETX2514 (ETX2514SUL) + Imipenem/Cilastatin36
Placebo + Imipenem/Cilastatin17

[back to top]