Page last updated: 2024-12-06

pravastatin

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Pravastatin is a synthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, commonly known as a statin, that is used to lower cholesterol levels. It was originally developed in the early 1980s by Sankyo, and was approved by the FDA in 1988. Pravastatin is produced through a fermentation process using the fungus *Monascus purpureus*. Its mechanism of action involves blocking the synthesis of cholesterol in the liver. This reduction in cholesterol levels leads to a decrease in the risk of cardiovascular disease, including heart attacks and strokes. Pravastatin is generally well-tolerated, with the most common side effects being muscle pain, headaches, and gastrointestinal disturbances. Its effectiveness in reducing cholesterol and preventing heart disease has made it a widely prescribed medication. Ongoing research focuses on its potential benefits in treating other conditions such as Alzheimer's disease and cancer.'

Pravastatin: An antilipemic fungal metabolite isolated from cultures of Nocardia autotrophica. It acts as a competitive inhibitor of HMG CoA reductase (HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COA REDUCTASES). [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

pravastatin : A carboxylic ester resulting from the formal condensation of (S)-2-methylbutyric acid with the hydroxy group adjacent to the ring junction of (3R,5R)-7-[(1S,2S,6S,8S,8aR)-6,8-dihydroxy-2-methyl-1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-1-yl]-3,5-dihydroxyheptanoic acid. Derived from microbial transformation of mevastatin, pravastatin is a reversible inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA). The sodium salt is used for lowering cholesterol and preventing cardiovascular disease. It is one of the lower potency statins, but has the advantage of fewer side effects compared with lovastatin and simvastatin. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

acanthoside D: from Salsola collina [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID54687
CHEMBL ID1144
CHEBI ID63618
SCHEMBL ID1117
MeSH IDM0025879
PubMed CID71312557
CHEMBL ID2442731
CHEBI ID144389
MeSH IDM0025879

Synonyms (92)

Synonym
BIDD:GT0773
BRD-K60511616-236-01-4
chebi:63618 ,
pravator
c10aa03
gtpl2953
eptastatin
(3r,5r)-3,5-dihydroxy-7-[(1s,2s,6s,8s,8ar)-6-hydroxy-2-methyl-8-{[(2s)-2-methylbutanoyl]oxy}-1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-1-yl]heptanoic acid
pravastatina [spanish]
pravastatin [inn:ban]
pravastatine [french]
1-naphthaleneheptanoic acid, 1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-beta,delta,6-trihydroxy-2-methyl-8-(2-methyl-1-oxobutoxy)-, (1s-(1alpha(betas*,deltas*),2alpha,6alpha,8beta(r*),8aalpha))-
pravastatinum [latin]
ccris 7557
1-naphthaleneheptanoic acid, 1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-beta,delta,6-trihydroxy-2-methyl-8-((2s)-2-methyl-1-oxobutoxy)-, (betar,deltar,1s,2s,6s,8s,8ar)-
1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-beta,delta,6-trihydroxy-2-methyl-8-(2-methyl-1-oxobutoxy)-, (1s-(1alpha(betas*,deltas*),2alpha,6alpha,8beta(r*),8aalpha))-1-naphthaleneheptanoic acid
bdbm20688
chembl1144 ,
(3r,5r)-7-[(1s,2s,6s,8s,8ar)-6-hydroxy-2-methyl-8-{[(2s)-2-methylbutanoyl]oxy}-1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-1-yl]-3,5-dihydroxyheptanoic acid
C01844
pravastatin
81093-37-0
pravastatin acid
(+)-(3r,5r)-3,5-dihydroxy-7-[(1s,2s,6s,8s,8ar)-6-hydroxy-2-methyl-8-{[(s)-2-methylbutyryl]oxy}-1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-1-naphthyl]heptanoic acid
DB00175
pravastatin (inn)
D08410
pravator (tn)
(3r,5r)-7-[(1s,2s,6s,8s,8ar)-6-hydroxy-2-methyl-8-[(2s)-2-methylbutanoyl]oxy-1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-1-yl]-3,5-dihydroxyheptanoic acid
(3r,5r)-3,5-dihydroxy-7-[(1s,2s,6s,8s)-6-hydroxy-2-methyl-8-[(2s)-2-methylbutanoyl]oxy-1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-1-yl]heptanoic acid
A840039
NCGC00188962-01
unii-kxo2kt9n0g
kxo2kt9n0g ,
pravastatina
pravastatine
hsdb 8368
pravastatinum
NCGC00188962-02
pravastatin [ema epar]
pravastatin [inn]
pravastatin [vandf]
pravastatin [who-dd]
AKOS015895229
S5713
CCG-221195
HY-B0165
SCHEMBL1117
KS-5015 ,
TUZYXOIXSAXUGO-PZAWKZKUSA-N
1,4-butanedisulfonicaciddisodiumsalt
mevalothin
DTXSID6023498 ,
LMFA05000695
SR-01000781259-2
sr-01000781259
3beta-hydroxycompactin
HMS3715P11
(3r,5r)-3,5-dihydroxy-7-((1s,2s,6s,8s,8ar)-6-hydroxy-2-methyl-8-((s)-2-methylbutanoyloxy)-1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-1-yl)heptanoic acid
Q1240093
(betar,deltar,1s,2s,6s,8s,8ar)-1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-beta,delta,6-trihydroxy-2-methyl-8-[(2s)-2-methyl-1-oxobutoxy]-1-naphthaleneheptanoic acid
BRD-K60511616-236-08-9
BRD-K60511616-236-02-2
H12037
pravastatin-3h
1-naphthaleneheptanoic acid, 1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-.beta.,.delta.,6-trihydroxy-2-methyl-8-[(2s)-2-methyl-1-oxobutoxy]-, (.beta.r,.delta,r,1s,2s,6s,8s,8ar)-
EN300-6481366
dtxcid003498
(+)-(3r,5r)-3,5-dihydroxy-7-((1s,2s,6s,8s,8ar)-6-hydroxy-2-methyl-8-(((s)-2-methylbutyryl)oxy)-1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-1-naphthyl)heptanoic acid
(3r,5r)-3,5-dihydroxy-7-((1s,2s,6s,8s,8ar)-6-hydroxy-2-methyl-8-(((2s)-2-methylbutanoyl)oxy)-1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-1-yl)heptanoic acid
(1s-(1alpha(betas*,deltas*),2alpha,6alpha,8beta(r*),8aalpha))-1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-beta,!d,6-trihydroxy-2-methyl-8-(2-methyl-1-oxobutoxy)-1-naphthaleneheptanoic acid
pravastatinum (latin)
8jp2p44h3z ,
beta-d-glucopyranoside, ((1r,3ar,4s,6as)-tetrahydro-1h,3h-furo(3,4-c)furan-1,4-diyl)bis(2,6-dimethoxy-4,1-phenylene) bis-
unii-8jp2p44h3z
acanthoside d
CHEBI:144389
(2s,3r,4s,5s,6r)-2-[4-[(3s,3ar,6r,6as)-6-[3,5-dimethoxy-4-[(2s,3r,4s,5s,6r)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxyphenyl]-1,3,3a,4,6,6a-hexahydrouro[3,4-c]uran-3-yl]-2,6-dimethoxyphenoxy]-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxane-3,4,5-triol
CHEMBL2442731
CS-5288
HY-N0272
C20786
4-((1r,3as,4s,6ar)-4-(4-(.beta.-l-glucopyranosyloxy)-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)tetrahydro-1h,3h-furo(3,4-c)furan-1-yl)-2,6-dimethoxyphenyl .beta.-d-glucopyranoside
.beta.-d-glucopyranoside, ((1r,3ar,4s,6as)-tetrahydro-1h,3h-furo(3,4-c)furan-1,4-diyl)bis(2,6-dimethoxy-4,1-phenylene) bis-
eleutheroside e [usp-rs]
eleutheroside e (constituent of eleuthero) [dsc]
AKOS030526142
[(1r,3ar,4s,6as)-tetrahydro-1h,3h-furo[3,4-c]furan-1,4-diyl]bis(2,6-dimethoxy-4,1-phenylene) bis-beta-d-glucopyranoside
(2s,3r,4s,5s,6r)-2-[4-[(3s,3ar,6r,6as)-6-[3,5-dimethoxy-4-[(2s,3r,4s,5s,6r)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxyphenyl]-1,3,3a,4,6,6a-hexahydrofuro[3,4-c]furan-3-yl]-2,6-dimethoxyphenoxy]-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxane-3,4,5-triol
Q27270642
AS-56698
DTXSID801316969

Research Excerpts

Overview

Pravastatin acts as a protector on myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury by regulating miR-93/Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway. It is an effective agent to slow progression of structural kidney disease in children and young adults with ADPKD. Pravstatin is a lipid-lowering agent that attenuates atherosclerosis.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Pravastatin sodium (PVS) is a hypolipidemic drug which suffers from extensive first-pass metabolism and short half-life. "( Formulation and Evaluation of Pravastatin Sodium-Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles: In vitro-in vivo Studies Assessment.
El-Dahan, MS; Elsayed, SI; Girgis, GNS, 2023
)
2.64
"Pravastatin acts as a protector on myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury by regulating miR-93/Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway."( Protective Effect of Pravastatin on Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion Injury by Regulation of the miR-93/Nrf2/ARE Signal Pathway.
Li, Y; Liu, L; Liu, Z; Zhang, F; Zhang, X; Zhao, L, 2020
)
2.32
"Pravastatin is an effective agent to slow progression of structural kidney disease in children and young adults with ADPKD. "( Effect of pravastatin on total kidney volume, left ventricular mass index, and microalbuminuria in pediatric autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.
Cadnapaphornchai, MA; George, DM; Gitomer, B; McFann, K; Schrier, RW; Strain, JD; Wang, W, 2014
)
2.25
"Pravastatin sodium is an [HMG-CoA] reductase inhibitor and is a lipid-regulating drug. "( Pravastatin sodium.
Al-Badr, AA; Mostafa, GA, 2014
)
3.29
"Pravastatin sodium (PVS) is a hydrophilic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor that is mainly absorbed from duodenum. "( Duodenum-triggered delivery of pravastatin sodium via enteric surface-coated nanovesicular spanlastic dispersions: development, characterization and pharmacokinetic assessments.
Abd-Elsalam, WH; El-Nabarawi, MA; Tadros, MI; Tayel, SA, 2015
)
2.15
"1. Pravastatin is a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor used for the treatment of hyperlipidaemia. "( Mixed effects of OATP1B1, BCRP and NTCP polymorphisms on the population pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in healthy volunteers.
Bi, KS; Chen, XH; Lu, XF; Zhou, Y, 2016
)
1.28
"Pravastatin is a lipid-lowering agent that attenuates atherosclerosis. "( Pravastatin and Sarpogrelate Synergistically Ameliorate Atherosclerosis in LDLr-Knockout Mice.
Heo, TH; Jun, HS; Kwak, MK; Oh, E; Park, KY, 2016
)
3.32
"Pravastatin sodium (PVS) is a freely water-soluble HMG-CoA inhibitor that suffers from instability at gastric pH, extensive first pass metabolism, short elimination half-life (1-3 h) and low oral bioavailability (18%)."( Duodenum-triggered delivery of pravastatin sodium: II. Design, appraisal and pharmacokinetic assessments of enteric surface-decorated nanocubosomal dispersions.
Abd-Elsalam, WH; El-Nabarawi, MA; Tadros, MI; Tayel, SA, 2016
)
2.16
"Pravastatin is an important therapeutic drug to treat hypercholesterolemia, which was described to be produced by oxyfunctionlization of mevastatin (compactin) by members of CYP105 family."( Identification of a new plasmid-encoded cytochrome P450 CYP107DY1 from Bacillus megaterium with a catalytic activity towards mevastatin.
Abdulmughni, A; Bernhardt, R; Hartz, P; Kern, F; Milhim, M; Putkaradze, N, 2016
)
1.16
"Pravastatin is a potent cholesterol-lowering agent; ~34% of an oral dose of pravastatin is eliminated unchanged through biliary and urinary excretion. "( Effects of a concomitant single oral dose of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in a two-phase, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy Chinese male subjects.
Cao, D; Chen, XP; Dai, ZY; Deng, S; Li, YJ; Luo, J; Tang, L; Yin, T, 2009
)
2.02
"Pravastatin is a well-known drug with anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties that may modulate host defense mechanisms against Leishmania."( Influence of long-term treatment with pravastatin on the survival, evolution of cutaneous lesion and weight of animals infected by Leishmania amazonensis.
Kückelhaus, CS; Kückelhaus, SA; Muniz-Junqueira, MI, 2011
)
1.36
"Pravastatin is an effective medication to activate PPARs (especially PPARgamma) in the liver and the gallbladder epithelium of hamsters, and contributes to the prevention of gallstone formation."( Pravastatin activates PPARalpha/PPARgamma expression in the liver and gallbladder epithelium of hamsters.
Choi, MH; Dong, SH; Jang, HJ; Kae, SH; Koh, DH; Lee, J, 2011
)
3.25
"Pravastatin is a hydrophilic statin that is selectively taken up by a sodium-independent organic anion transporter protein-1B1 (OATP1B1) exclusively expressed in liver."( Differential effects of pravastatin and simvastatin on the growth of tumor cells from different organ sites.
Chakraborty, K; Harirforoosh, S; Hsi, L; Krishnan, K; Menter, DG; Newman, RA; Ramsauer, VP; Yang, P, 2011
)
1.4
"Pravastatin has shown to be an effective and safe therapy in dyslipidemic cardiac transplant patients."( [Utility of pravastin in cardiac transplant dyslipidemia].
Almenar Bonet, L; Arnau Vives, MA; Dicenta Gisbert, F; Martínez-Dolz, L; Osa Sáez, A; Palencia Pérez, M; Rueda Soriano, J, 2002
)
1.04
"Pravastatin is a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitor often prescribed for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia."( Massive postoperative rhabdomyolysis following combined CABG/abdominal aortic replacement: a possible association with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
Fischer, S; Haverich, A; Strüber, M; Walles, T; Wilhelmi, M; Winterhalter, M; Zuk, J, 2002
)
1.04
"Pravastatin is a widely used statin in adults, but its pharmacokinetics in children is not known. "( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pravastatin in children with familial hypercholesterolemia.
Antikainen, M; Hedman, M; Neuvonen, M; Neuvonen, PJ, 2003
)
2.03
"Pravastatin (Pravachol) is a competitive, reversible HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor that lowers serum cholesterol levels by inhibiting de novo cholesterol synthesis and has antiatherogenic effects that appear to be partially independent of its lipid-lowering effects. "( Pravastatin: a review of its use in elderly patients.
Bang, LM; Goa, KL, 2003
)
3.2
"Pravastatin (PRA) is an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase enzyme, which is clinically used as a hypolipidemic agent to reduce cholesterol level. "( Determination of pravastatin in tablets by capillary electrophoresis.
Aboul-Enein, HY; Kircali, K; Tunçel, M, 2004
)
2.11
"Pravastatin is a well known 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor. "( Bile salt export pump (BSEP/ABCB11) can transport a nonbile acid substrate, pravastatin.
Hayashi, H; Hirano, M; Kusuhara, H; Maeda, K; Sugiyama, Y, 2005
)
2
"Pravastatin is a commonly used statin after cardiac transplantation, with favorable outcome and acceptable side-effect profile."( Localized rhabdomyolysis after exertion in a cardiac transplant recipient on statin therapy.
Biggs, MJ; Bonser, RS; Cram, R, 2006
)
1.06
"Pravastatin is a hydrophilic substrate and fluvastatin a lipophilic substrate of the hepatic uptake transporter organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 encoded by SLCO1B1. "( SLCO1B1 polymorphism and sex affect the pharmacokinetics of pravastatin but not fluvastatin.
Neuvonen, PJ; Niemi, M; Pasanen, MK, 2006
)
2.02
"Pravastatin treatment is an independent predictor for improvement of post-loaded hyperglycemia (odds ratio; 5.7; 95% confidence interval 1.7-19.3; p=0.003) and achieved beneficial conversion from IGT to normal glucose tolerance (40%; p=0.03)."( Pravastatin improved glucose metabolism associated with increasing plasma adiponectin in patients with impaired glucose tolerance and coronary artery disease.
Fukushima, H; Funahashi, T; Horibata, Y; Koga, H; Kojima, S; Kugiyama, K; Maruyoshi, H; Ogawa, H; Otsuka, F; Sakamoto, T; Shimomura, I; Sugamura, K; Sugiyama, S; Watanabe, K, 2007
)
2.5
"Pravastatin is a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, which is widely used both in primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD). "( SLCO1B1 521T-->C functional genetic polymorphism and lipid-lowering efficacy of multiple-dose pravastatin in Chinese coronary heart disease patients.
Chen, BL; Deng, S; Fan, L; He, YJ; Ozdemir, V; Peng, DD; Wang, A; Wang, LC; Xie, QY; Xie, W; Xu, LY; Zhang, W; Zhou, G; Zhou, HH, 2007
)
2
"Pravastatin is a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) and is hydrophilic."( Effective uptake of N-acetylglucosamine-conjugated liposomes by cardiomyocytes in vitro.
Aso, S; Goto, M; Ikeda, U; Ise, H; Izawa, A; Kobayashi, S; Morimoto, H; Takahashi, M, 2007
)
1.06
"Pravastatin appears to be an effective and safe lipid-lowering agent and is the first 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor to be studied extensively in this underrepresented population."( Efficacy and safety of pravastatin in African Americans with primary hypercholesterolemia.
Chin, MM; Curry, CL; Jacobson, TA; LaRosa, JC; Miller, V; Papademetriou, V; Schlant, RC, 1995
)
2.04
"Pravastatin is a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor that reduces plasma cholesterol levels. "( High-performance liquid chromatography determination of pravastatin in plasma.
Buggia, I; Fiorito, V; Guarnone, E; Iacona, I; Molinaro, M; Regazzi, MB; Villani, P, 1994
)
1.98
"Pravastatin is a new potent cholesterol-lowering agent, which selectively inhibits hepatic HMG-CoA-reductase."( [Pravastatin in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia: a Swiss multicenter study].
Erne, P; Ferrari, P; Fragiacomo, C; Luban, S; Martius, F; Noseda, G; Pasotti, E; Reutter, F; Riesen, WF; Weidmann, P, 1993
)
1.92
"Pravastatin is an effective and safe drug."( [Cholesterol and vascular disease. Study of pravastatin ].
Bellandi, F; Cantini, F; Palchetti, R; Pedone, T, 1993
)
1.27
"Pravastatin is a new lipid-lowering drug belonging to the class of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors. "( Long-term experience with pravastatin in clinical research trials.
McGovern, ME; Mellies, MJ,
)
1.87
"Pravastatin is a much weaker inhibitor of cholesterol synthesis (IC50-value of 977.8 nM) in these cells."( Vastatins have a distinct effect on sterol synthesis and progesterone secretion in human granulosa cells in vitro.
Cohen, LH; Naaktgeboren, N; van Thiel, GC; van Vliet, AK, 1996
)
1.02
"Pravastatin is a weaker inhibitor of sterol synthesis (IC50 value of 110 +/- 38 nM)."( Action of lovastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin on sterol synthesis and their antiproliferative effect in cultured myoblasts from human striated muscle.
Bolhuis, PA; Cohen, LH; Nègre-Aminou, P; van Thiel, GC; van Vliet, AK, 1996
)
1.28
"Pravastatin is an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor which lowers plasma cholesterol levels by inhibiting de novo cholesterol synthesis. "( Pravastatin. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and clinical effectiveness in the management of coronary heart disease.
Haria, M; McTavish, D, 1997
)
3.18
"Pravastatin is an HMG CoA reductase inhibitor used in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia. "( Steady state serum concentrations of pravastatin and digoxin when given in combination.
Cohen, AI; Devault, A; Pan, HY; Swanson, BN; Triscari, J; Willard, DA, 1993
)
2
"Pravastatin, which is a structural analogue of mevalonic acid and is absorbed via proton-coupled transport like mevalonic acid, did not."( Intestinal brush-border membrane transport of monocarboxylic acids mediated by proton-coupled transport and anion antiport mechanisms.
Maeda, H; Sai, Y; Suzuki, Y; Takanaga, H; Tamai, I; Tsuji, A; Yabuuchi, H, 1997
)
1.02
"Pravastatin is a hydrophilic liver-specific inhibitor of the enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase. "( Determination of pravastatin by high performance liquid chromatography.
Gross, W; März, W; Siekmeier, R, 2000
)
2.09
"Pravastatin is a potent inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase and is effective in lowering serum lipid levels. "( Pravastatin suppress superoxide and fibronectin production of glomerular mesangial cells induced by oxidized-LDL and high glucose.
Chen, HC; Guh, JY; Lai, YH; Shin, SJ, 2002
)
3.2
"Pravastatin is a potent inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase and is effective in lowering serum lipid levels. "( Effects of pravastatin on superoxide and fibronectin production of mesangial cells induced by low-density lipoprotein.
Chen, HC; Guh, JY; Lai, YH; Shin, SJ; Tomino, Y, 2002
)
2.15
"Pravastatin is a new drug that inhibits 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase, the key enzyme in cholesterol synthesis. "( [Evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of pravastatin in monothereapy and in association with gemfibrozil in hypercholesterolemia associated with moderate hyperglyceridemia].
Ambrosio, G; Chiariello, M; Lepore, S; Napoli, C, 1992
)
1.99
"Pravastatin was found to be a relatively effective, safe and well tolerated lipid-lowering drug. "( Treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia with pravastatin: efficacy and safety over three years.
Clifton, P; Janus, ED; Nestel, PJ; Parfitt, A; Simons, J; Simons, LA, 1992
)
1.98
"Pravastatin sodium is a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia."( Pravastatin: a new drug for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia.
Cantral, KA; Jungnickel, PW; Maloley, PA, 1992
)
2.45
"Pravastatin seems to be a highly effective, well tolerated drug for severe hypercholesterolaemia. "( Treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia. United Kingdom lipid clinics study of pravastatin and cholestyramine.
Betteridge, DJ; Bhatnager, D; Bing, RF; Durrington, PN; Evans, GR; Flax, H; Jay, RH; Lewis-Barned, N; Mann, J; Matthews, DR, 1992
)
1.95
"Pravastatin is a foreign substrate of a sodium-independent transport system for bile acids. "( Tissue-selective action of pravastatin due to hepatocellular uptake via a sodium-independent bile acid transporter.
Stünkel, W; Ziegler, K, 1992
)
2.02
"Pravastatin sodium (PV) is a potent cholesterol-lowering agent that acts by inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase. "( Biotransformation of pravastatin sodium in humans.
Chando, TJ; Didonato, GC; Everett, DW; Pan, HY; Singhvi, SM; Weinstein, SH,
)
1.89
"Pravastatin is an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor which reduces plasma cholesterol levels by inhibiting de novo cholesterol synthesis and increasing the receptor-mediated catabolism of low density lipoprotein (LDL). "( Pravastatin. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic potential in hypercholesterolaemia.
McTavish, D; Sorkin, EM, 1991
)
3.17
"Pravastatin appears to be a safe and efficacious method of treating hyperlipidemia in renal transplant recipients."( The effects of pravastatin on hyperlipidemia in renal transplant recipients.
Ohmori, Y; Oka, T; Okamoto, M; Yoshimura, N, 1992
)
1.36
"Pravastatin (CS-514) is a tissue selective inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (EC 1.1.1.34), a key enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis. "( A two component-type cytochrome P-450 monooxygenase system in a prokaryote that catalyzes hydroxylation of ML-236B to pravastatin, a tissue-selective inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase.
Matsuoka, T; Serizawa, N, 1991
)
1.93
"Pravastatin is a metabolic product of mevastatin and a potent inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase. "( The effect of pravastatin on plasma lipoprotein and apolipoprotein levels in primary hypercholesterolemia. The Southeastern Michigan Collaborative Group.
Blevins, RD; Kobylak, L; Maciejko, JJ; Orringer, C; Rosman, H; Rubenfire, M, 1991
)
2.08

Effects

Pravastatin has a predominantly delayed antiatherogenic effect, and aspirin has an immediate antiplatelet effect, raising the possibility of additive clinical benefits. It has a neutral drug interaction profile relative to cytochrome P450-3A4 inhibitors.

Pravastatin has been reported to elevate circulating adiponectin levels in patients with various insulin resistant state, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and hypercholesterolemia. Pravstatin has neuroprotective effects against aging but its role in brain injury remains unclear.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Pravastatin has a predominantly delayed antiatherogenic effect, and aspirin has an immediate antiplatelet effect, raising the possibility of additive clinical benefits."( Additive benefits of pravastatin and aspirin to decrease risks of cardiovascular disease: randomized and observational comparisons of secondary prevention trials and their meta-analyses.
Belder, R; Berry, DA; Berry, SM; Byington, RP; Fiedorek, FT; Ford, NF; Hennekens, CH; Jukema, JW; Natarajan, K; Pitt, B; Sacks, FM; Sheng-Lin, C; Tonkin, A; Walker, AJ, 2004
)
1.36
"Pravastatin has a neutral drug interaction profile relative to cytochrome P450-3A4 inhibitors, but these substrates markedly increase systemic exposure to simvastatin and atorvastatin."( Comparative pharmacokinetic interaction profiles of pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin when coadministered with cytochrome P450 inhibitors.
Jacobson, TA, 2004
)
1.3
"Pravastatin also has an antithrombotic action."( Pravastatin (mevalotin) restenosis trial after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Cholesterol reduction rate determines the restenosis rate.
Hosoda, S; Kawai, C; Yui, Y, 1995
)
2.46
"Pravastatin has a moderate effect in reducing the risk of stroke from any cause and the risk of nonhemorrhagic stroke in patients with previous myocardial infarction or unstable angina."( Pravastatin therapy and the risk of stroke.
Anderson, NE; Colquhoun, DM; Glasziou, P; Hankey, GJ; Hunt, D; Kirby, AC; MacMahon, S; Simes, RJ; Tonkin, AM; Watson, JD; West, MJ; White, HD, 2000
)
3.19
"Pravastatin has been demonstrated to have preventative effects in preeclampsia model mice, and a large volume of human data from pregnant women taking statins supports the safety of these drugs."( Pravastatin for preeclampsia: From animal to human.
Fujii, T; Iriyama, T; Kumasawa, K; Nagamatsu, T; Osuga, Y, 2020
)
2.72
"Pravastatin has emerged for prevention and treatment of preeclampsia; no reports are available on pravastatin and HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets) syndrome."( Pravastatin for prevention of HELLP syndrome: A case report.
Gembruch, U; Kühr, M; Merz, WM; Otten, LA; van der Ven, K, 2017
)
3.34
"Pravastatin has shown efficacy and to be safe during hypertension in pregnancy."( Placental nitric oxide formation and endothelium-dependent vasodilation underlie pravastatin effects against angiogenic imbalance, hypertension in pregnancy and intrauterine growth restriction.
Chimini, JS; da Silva, MLS; Dias-Junior, CA; Possomato-Vieira, JS, 2019
)
1.46
"Pravastatin has been reported to elevate circulating adiponectin levels in patients with various insulin resistant state, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and hypercholesterolemia. "( Effects of pravastatin on serum adiponectin levels in female patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Chang, SA; Kim, JH; Lee, JM; Lee, MR; Lee, SS; Shin, JA; Yoon, KH; You, SJ, 2013
)
2.22
"Pravastatin has been shown to prevent preeclampsia in animal models."( The effect of prenatal pravastatin treatment on altered fetal programming of postnatal growth and metabolic function in a preeclampsia-like murine model.
Costantine, MM; Gamble, P; Hankins, GD; Kechichian, T; Longo, M; McDonnold, M; Saade, GR; Tamayo, E, 2014
)
1.43
"Pravastatin has been demonstrated to be useful in preventing steroid-induced ONFH in animal models."( Pravastatin prevents steroid-induced osteonecrosis in rats by suppressing PPARγ expression and activating Wnt signaling pathway.
Chen, W; Jiang, Y; Li, P; Lin, N; Lu, C; Xu, Y; Zhang, H; Zhang, Y; Zhu, B, 2014
)
2.57
"Pravastatin has neuroprotective effects against aging but its role in brain injury remains unclear. "( Effects of pravastatin on cellular ultrastructure and hemorheology in rats after traumatic head injury.
Basak, AT; Berker, M; Dikmenoglu, N; Hazer, DB; Ileri-Gurel, E; Kaymaz, F; Narin, F; Seringec, N; Tuncel, M, 2010
)
2.19
"Pravastatin has favorable safety and pharmacokinetic profiles."( Pravastatin for the prevention of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women.
Cleary, K; Costantine, MM, 2013
)
2.55
"Pravastatin has shown to be an effective and safe therapy in dyslipidemic cardiac transplant patients."( [Utility of pravastin in cardiac transplant dyslipidemia].
Almenar Bonet, L; Arnau Vives, MA; Dicenta Gisbert, F; Martínez-Dolz, L; Osa Sáez, A; Palencia Pérez, M; Rueda Soriano, J, 2002
)
1.04
"Pravastatin (P) has been shown to be effective in adult renal Tx recipients, not only in reducing serum cholesterol, but possibly also in decreasing graft rejection."( Pilot study describing the use of pravastatin in pediatric renal transplant recipients.
Butani, L; Makker, SP; Pai, MV, 2003
)
1.32
"Pravastatin has a predominantly delayed antiatherogenic effect, and aspirin has an immediate antiplatelet effect, raising the possibility of additive clinical benefits."( Additive benefits of pravastatin and aspirin to decrease risks of cardiovascular disease: randomized and observational comparisons of secondary prevention trials and their meta-analyses.
Belder, R; Berry, DA; Berry, SM; Byington, RP; Fiedorek, FT; Ford, NF; Hennekens, CH; Jukema, JW; Natarajan, K; Pitt, B; Sacks, FM; Sheng-Lin, C; Tonkin, A; Walker, AJ, 2004
)
1.36
"Pravastatin has a neutral drug interaction profile relative to cytochrome P450-3A4 inhibitors, but these substrates markedly increase systemic exposure to simvastatin and atorvastatin."( Comparative pharmacokinetic interaction profiles of pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin when coadministered with cytochrome P450 inhibitors.
Jacobson, TA, 2004
)
1.3
"Pravastatin has been reported to reduce cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). "( The effect of 6 months of treatment with pravastatin on serum adiponection concentrations in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease and hypercholesterolemia: a pilot study.
Ogawa, H; Sakamoto, K; Sakamoto, T, 2006
)
2.04
"Pravastatin also has an antithrombotic action."( Pravastatin (mevalotin) restenosis trial after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Cholesterol reduction rate determines the restenosis rate.
Hosoda, S; Kawai, C; Yui, Y, 1995
)
2.46
"pravastatin) has gradually increased in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia."( Changes in biliary lipid output after interruption of pravastatin treatment in humans.
Einarsson, K; Eriksson, M; Hillebrant, CG; Nyberg, B, 1996
)
1.26
"Pravastatin has been found to have clinical benefits beyond those predicted by its actions in reducing plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL). "( Pravastatin sodium activates endothelial nitric oxide synthase independent of its cholesterol-lowering actions.
Caldwell, RB; Caldwell, RW; Huang, J; Kaesemeyer, WH, 1999
)
3.19
"Pravastatin has a moderate effect in reducing the risk of stroke from any cause and the risk of nonhemorrhagic stroke in patients with previous myocardial infarction or unstable angina."( Pravastatin therapy and the risk of stroke.
Anderson, NE; Colquhoun, DM; Glasziou, P; Hankey, GJ; Hunt, D; Kirby, AC; MacMahon, S; Simes, RJ; Tonkin, AM; Watson, JD; West, MJ; White, HD, 2000
)
3.19
"Pravastatin has been shown, in an experimental model of ischemia reperfusion, to increase adenosine levels, which exert a potent and protective effect on the heart. "( Effect of pravastatin on myocardial protection during coronary angioplasty and the role of adenosine.
Chou, TF; Lee, TM; Su, SF; Tsai, CH, 2001
)
2.16
"Pravastatin has been demonstrated to reduce cholesterol in patients with familial and nonfamilial polygenic hypercholesterolemia and patients with diabetes mellitus."( Pravastatin: a new drug for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia.
Cantral, KA; Jungnickel, PW; Maloley, PA, 1992
)
2.45
"Pravastatin has no affinity to other transport systems in liver cells such as those for long-chain fatty acids, amino acids, rifampicin and bivalent organic cations."( Tissue-selective action of pravastatin due to hepatocellular uptake via a sodium-independent bile acid transporter.
Stünkel, W; Ziegler, K, 1992
)
1.3

Actions

Pravastatin did not increase the rate of cancer incidence or cancer death in a large population of Japanese patients followed for >70,000 patient-years. Pravstatin can inhibit these pathways and suppress the apoptosis and necrosis of IMECs to relieve the cell inflammatory injuries.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Pravastatin can inhibit these pathways and suppress the apoptosis and necrosis of IMECs to relieve the cell inflammatory injuries."( [Protective effects of pravastatin against P38MAPK signaling pathway-mediated inflammatory toxicity in islet micro-endothelial cells].
Cai, D; Chen, J; Chen, S; Hu, N; Kang, Y; Luo, L; Sun, J; Zhang, J, 2013
)
1.42
"Pravastatin can inhibit dendritic cell activation, which is independent of plasma cholesterol lowering."( Effects of pravastatin on the function of dendritic cells in patients with coronary heart disease.
Cheng, JL; Cui, J; Dong, M; Jiang, SL; Li, QS; Li, X; Liu, C; Peng, CH; Tian, Y, 2009
)
1.46
"Both Pravastatin and G-CSF can enhance EPC mobilization from the bone marrow and VEGF release, but G-CSF produces a stronger effect on EPC mobilization in association of VEGF release."( [Effects of pravastatin and granulocyto-colony stimulating factor in mobilizing endothelial progenitor cells in mice with myocardial ischemia].
Chen, TT; Gao, CQ; Li, LB; Mi, WD; Wang, G, 2009
)
1.19
"Pravastatin did not increase the rate of cancer incidence or cancer death in a large population of Japanese patients followed for >70,000 patient-years."( Pravastatin use and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from long-term prospective controlled trials in Japan.
Hattori, Y; Iwashita, M; Kaburagi, J; Matsushita, Y; Ozawa, M; Saito, H; Sugihara, M; Yoshida, S, 2010
)
3.25
"Pravastatin can inhibit the proliferation and invasion of HepG2 cells."( [Effects of pravastatin on the proliferation and invasion of human hepatocarcinoma HepG2 cell line].
Gong, YX; Li, ZX; Mao, WW; Qu, Y; Tian, SJ; Yang, SH; Zhang, WJ, 2010
)
2.18
"Pravastatin can inhibit the proliferation and syndean-4 protein expression in rat VSMCs induced by TNF-alpha in vitro."( [Pravastatin inhibits the expression of syndecan-4 protein in tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced rat vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro].
Lai, WY; Luo, Y; Ouyang, P; Xu, DL; Zhang, Y, 2010
)
2.71
"Pravastatin-induced increase in insulin sensitivity is mediated by elevation of 1,25-(OH)(2)-D(3)."( Opposite effects of pravastatin and atorvastatin on insulin sensitivity in the rat: role of vitamin D metabolites.
Atanassova, P; Bełtowski, J; Chaldakov, GN; Jamroz-Wiśniewska, A; Kula, W; Rusek, M, 2011
)
1.41
"Pravastatin may inhibit the secretion and activation of MMP-2."( [Effects of interaction between vascular endothelial cells and monocytes on expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2 and regulation of pravastatin].
Yang, XH; Zheng, W, 2005
)
1.24
"The pravastatin-induced increase in TM expression in TNFalpha-treated HAECs was mediated through inhibition of NF-kappaB activation."( Pravastatin induces thrombomodulin expression in TNFalpha-treated human aortic endothelial cells by inhibiting Rac1 and Cdc42 translocation and activity.
Chen, JW; Chen, YH; Chen, YL; Hsieh, LY; Ku, HH; Lin, CY; Lin, FY; Lin, SJ; Wang, SH; Wang, YC, 2007
)
2.26
"Pravastatin appears to inhibit the synthesis and subsequent degradation of extracellular matrix proteins and block the infiltration of macrophages to the graft, which emphasizes that this inflammatory cell plays a major role in the pathogenesis of transplant chronic rejection."( Effects of pravastatin on chronic rejection of rat cardiac allografts.
Busuttil, RW; Imagawa, DK; Kaldas, F; Ke, B; Maggard, MA; Seu, P; Wang, T, 1998
)
1.41
"Pravastatin could inhibit over-expression of PAI-1 mRNA in the rabbit liver with hyperlipidemia and fatty liver, and reduce its plasma PAI-1 activity."( [Effects of pravastatin on hepatic plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 mRNA expression in rabbits with fatty liver].
Chen, L; Fan, J; Zeng, M, 2000
)
2.13
"5. Pravastatin inhibit the activator protein-1 activity, but did not inhibit the activation of IkappaB-alpha."( Pravastatin suppresses the interleukin-8 production induced by thrombin in human aortic endothelial cells cultured with high glucose by inhibiting the p44/42 mitogen activated protein kinase.
Kishida, M; Kobayashi, M; Nakamura, N; Nobata, Y; Sato, A; Takata, M; Temaru, R; Urakaze, M; Yamazaki, K, 2001
)
2.27
"Pravastatin did not inhibit aortic ring contraction."( Inhibition of smooth muscle cell calcium mobilization and aortic ring contraction by lactone vastatins.
Altieri, PI; Crespo, MJ; Escobales, N; Furilla, RA, 1996
)
1.02
"Pravastatin lead to an increase of the HDL concentration of approximately 8%, gemfibrocil to approximately 13%, whilst cholestyramine alone did not change this lipid fraction."( [Pravastatin, cholestyramine and gemfibrozil in long-term therapy of primary hypercholesterolemia. An open randomized comparative study].
Dammann, HG; Ditschuneit, H; Ditschuneit, HH; Dreyer, M, 1991
)
1.91

Treatment

Pravastatin treatment decreased total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides levels by 24%, 32%, and 14%, respectively. The treatment did not affect glucose and insulin levels, the (QUICKI) index, and adiponectin and leptin levels.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Pravastatin treatment ameliorated the remodeling and improved cardiac output postpartum."( Statins Reverse Postpartum Cardiovascular Dysfunction in a Rat Model of Preeclampsia.
Birukov, A; Dechend, R; Geisberger, S; Golic, M; Haase, N; Herse, F; Heuser, A; Kräker, K; Müller, DN; O'Driscoll, JM; Patey, O; Schütte, T; Thilaganathan, B; Verlohren, S, 2020
)
1.28
"Pravastatin treatment for 6 months, but not for 2 days, inhibited leukocyte activation and improved hemorheological parameters."( Pravastatin improves postprandial endothelial dysfunction and hemorheological deterioration in patients with effort angina pectoris.
Arao, K; Fujita, H; Horie, Y; Ikeda, N; Kawakami, M; Momomura, SI; Sugimura, H; Umemoto, T; Yasu, T, 2017
)
2.62
"Pravastatin-treated individuals lived RMST 2,088.1 days), on average, 18.7 more days free of CHD over 6 years than those receiving usual care (RMST 2,069.4 days), but this difference was not statistically significant (difference 18.7 days, 95% CI=-10.4-47.8 days, p=.21)."( Pravastatin for Primary Prevention in Older Adults: Restricted Mean Survival Time Analysis.
Kim, DH; Lux, E; Orkaby, AR; Rich, MW; Sun, R; Wei, LJ, 2018
)
2.64
"Pravastatin pretreatment ameliorates the intestinal microvascular oxygenation in sepsis and thus seems to prevent intestinal hypoxia. "( Effect of Pravastatin Pretreatment and Hypercapnia on Intestinal Microvascular Oxygenation and Blood Flow During Sepsis.
Bauer, I; Beck, C; Herminghaus, A; Picker, O; Schulz, J; Truse, R; Vollmer, C, 2020
)
2.4
"Pravastatin treatment had no effect on the glycemic status of patients with T2DM and hypercholesterolemia, but may reduce the percentage changes in the plasma HMW-adiponectin concentrations."( [Effect of Statins on Glycemic Status and Plasma Adiponectin Concentrations in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypercholesterolemia].
Hori, E; Imaeda, K; Kikuchi, C; Matsunaga, T; Okayama, N; Suzuki, T, 2019
)
1.24
"Pravastatin treatment did not improve angiogenic potential in RUPP serum and decreased (P<0.05) endothelial tube formation in NP rats."( Pravastatin attenuates hypertension, oxidative stress, and angiogenic imbalance in rat model of placental ischemia-induced hypertension.
Banek, CT; Bauer, AJ; Capoccia, S; Gilbert, JS; Gillham, H; Needham, K; Regal, JF, 2013
)
2.55
"Pravastatin treatment for 3.2 years reduced CHD death in the full cohort, hazard ratio (HR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.95, p=0.0091 and fatal coronary events or coronary hospitalisations in the Scottish cohort (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.95, p=0.0081) over 8.6 years. "( Long-term effects of statin treatment in elderly people: extended follow-up of the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER).
Briggs, A; Buckley, BM; Comber, H; de Craen, AJ; Ford, I; Jukema, JW; Kearney, PM; Lloyd, SM; Marchbank, L; Packard, CJ; Perry, I; Sattar, N; Stott, DJ; Trompet, S; Westendorp, RG, 2013
)
2.05
"Pravastatin treatment of elderly high-risk subjects for 3.2 years provided long-term protection against CHD events and CHD mortality. "( Long-term effects of statin treatment in elderly people: extended follow-up of the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER).
Briggs, A; Buckley, BM; Comber, H; de Craen, AJ; Ford, I; Jukema, JW; Kearney, PM; Lloyd, SM; Marchbank, L; Packard, CJ; Perry, I; Sattar, N; Stott, DJ; Trompet, S; Westendorp, RG, 2013
)
2.05
"With pravastatin treatment, this group has the highest absolute risk reduction and the lowest NNT to prevent fatal and nonfatal CHD."( Homocysteine levels and treatment effect in the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk.
Assendelft, WJ; Blom, HJ; Blom, JW; de Craen, AJ; de Ruijter, W; Drewes, YM; Ford, I; Gussekloo, J; Poortvliet, RK; Sattar, N; Stott, DJ; Westendorp, RG; Wouter Jukema, J, 2014
)
1.09
"Pravastatin-treated animals reached preimplant insulin requirements on days 22, 27, and 50."( Pravastatin improves glucose regulation and biocompatibility of agarose encapsulated porcine islets following transplantation into pancreatectomized dogs.
Carraway, JW; Gazda, LS; Hall, RD; Laramore, MA; Smith, BH; Vinerean, HV, 2014
)
2.57
"Pravastatin treatment produced similar results and normalized the lipid alteration."( Does combined peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-agonist and pravastatin therapy attenuate the onset of diabetes-induced experimental nephropathy?
Gad, HI, 2014
)
1.36
"The pravastatin treatment was less effective on plaque inflammation than pitavastatin treatment. "( Anti-inflammatory and morphologic effects of pitavastatin on carotid arteries and thoracic aorta evaluated by integrated backscatter trans-esophageal ultrasound and PET/CT: a prospective randomized comparative study with pravastatin (EPICENTRE study).
Arai, M; Kako, N; Kawasaki, M; Minatoguchi, S; Miwa, H; Nagaya, M; Noda, T; Onishi, N; Ono, K; Saeki, M; Sato, N; Tanaka, R; Watanabe, S; Watanabe, T, 2015
)
1.16
"Pravastatin treatment significantly improved the pathology of the lung after HILI (reduction in thickness of alveolar septum, attenuation of lung edema, fracturing of alveolar septa and decrease in infiltrated leukocytes); reduced the number of apoptotic cells; inhibited lung MPO activity; and regulated the balance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines."( Pravastatin protects hyperbaric hyperoxia-induced lung injury via inhibiting inflammation in mice.
Cai, Z; Cao, D; Chen, H; Li, R; Lin, F; Liu, W; Peng, Z; Xu, W; Zheng, J,
)
2.3
"Pravastatin treatment significantly enhanced LDL receptor (LDLR) and PCSK9 mRNA gene expression, as well as PCSK9 secretion and LDL uptake in both control and S127R HLCs."( Urine-sample-derived human induced pluripotent stem cells as a model to study PCSK9-mediated autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia.
Arnaud, L; Caillaud, A; Cariou, B; Champon, B; Idriss, S; Le May, C; Lemarchand, P; Pichelin, M; Si-Tayeb, K; Zibara, K, 2016
)
1.16
"Pravastatin treatment reduced PAR-1 expression in a concentration-dependent manner."( Pravastatin and C reactive protein modulate protease- activated receptor-1 expression in vitro blood platelets.
Chu, LX; He, LP; Liang, ZS; Mo, CG; Qin, YQ; Wang, XD; Xie, J; Yang, F; Zhou, SX, 2016
)
2.6
"Pravastatin treatment induced a significant decrease in the TC, LDL-c, and ApoB levels in patients expressing the ApoA1 AA+GA genotype (P < 0.05), and not in those expressing the GG genotype (P > 0.05)."( Relationship between the G75A polymorphism in the apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) gene and the lipid regulatory effects of pravastatin in patients with hyperlipidemia.
He, F; Li, HW; Li, SX; Liu, TN; Wu, CT; Wu, M; Yu, HY; Yuan, W, 2016
)
1.36
"Pravastatin treatment combined with LDA+LMWH was also associated with live births that occurred close to full term in all patients."( Pravastatin improves pregnancy outcomes in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome refractory to antithrombotic therapy.
Dagklis, T; Girardi, G; Lefkou, E; Mamopoulos, A; Rousso, D; Vosnakis, C, 2016
)
2.6
"The pravastatin treatment was effective for reducing the risk of CHD, regardless of the presence of risk factors."( The relationship between the effect of pravastatin and risk factors for coronary heart disease in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Ishikawa, T; Kushiro, T; Mizuno, K; Nakamura, H; Nakaya, N; Ohashi, Y; Tajima, N; Teramoto, T; Uchiyama, S, 2008
)
1.1
"Pravastatin-treated TAC mice also showed less cardiac apoptosis."( Inhibition of cardiac remodeling by pravastatin is associated with amelioration of endoplasmic reticulum stress.
Asakura, M; Asano, Y; Asanuma, H; Hori, M; Kim, J; Kitakaze, M; Liao, Y; Minamino, T; Takashima, S; Zhao, H, 2008
)
1.34
"Pravastatin treatments upregulated expressions of Cx43 at mRNA and protein levels and improved the INF-gamma/IL-10 balance which might be the working mechanisms for pravastatin-mediated anti-VMC and anti-arrhythmia effects in this VMC model."( [Effects of pravastatin on myocardial connexin 43, IFN-gamma and IL-10 expressions in a murine model of viral myocarditis induced by Coxsackievirus B3].
Fang, HY; Wu, SY, 2008
)
2.17
"Pravastatin treatment prevents the development of obesity and diabetes in DIO mice. "( Effects of pravastatin on obesity, diabetes, and adiponectin in diet-induced obese mice.
Araki, K; Kakuma, T; Katsuragi, I; Masaki, T; Yoshimatsu, H, 2008
)
2.18
"Pravastatin treatment in old age did not affect cognitive decline during a 3 year follow-up period."( Pravastatin and cognitive function in the elderly. Results of the PROSPER study.
Blauw, GJ; Bollen, EL; Buckley, BM; de Craen, AJ; Ford, I; Jolles, J; Jukema, JW; Macfarlane, PW; Murphy, MB; Packard, CJ; Sattar, N; Shepherd, J; Stott, DJ; Trompet, S; van Vliet, P; Westendorp, RG, 2010
)
2.52
"Pravastatin treatment before CABG may decrease the incidence of postoperative AF."( Pravastatin treatment before coronary artery bypass grafting for reduction of postoperative atrial fibrillation.
Arai, H; Ito, F; Miyagi, N; Someya, T; Tamura, K; Ushiyama, T, 2010
)
3.25
"Pravastatin treatment decreased the incidence of ventricular premature complexes by 22.5 + or - 3.4% (n = 20, p <0.05), couplets, and runs of 3 to 6 beats of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia from 9.8 + or - 2.67 to 3.9 + or - 1.25 events/patient/24 hours (n = 12, p <0.05)."( Differential effects of statins (pravastatin or simvastatin) on ventricular ectopic complexes: Galpha(i2), a possible molecular marker for ventricular irritability.
Confalone, D; Estes, NA; Galper, JB; Karas, RH; Naggar, J; Park, HJ; Rhofiry, J; Shea, J; Welzig, CM, 2010
)
1.36
"Pravastatin treatment decreased weight loss in Leishmania-infected C57BL6 mice and Syrian hamsters, but not infected BALB/c mice."( Influence of long-term treatment with pravastatin on the survival, evolution of cutaneous lesion and weight of animals infected by Leishmania amazonensis.
Kückelhaus, CS; Kückelhaus, SA; Muniz-Junqueira, MI, 2011
)
1.36
"Pravastatin treatment led to inhibition of Rac-GTPase activity and integrin signaling."( Cardiac remodeling caused by transgenic overexpression of a corn Rac gene.
Abouelnaga, ZA; Alhaj, MA; Awad, MM; Citro, LA; El-Sayed, O; Elnakish, MT; Hassanain, HH; Hassona, MD; Khan, M; Kulkarni, A; Kuppusamy, P; Moldovan, L; Sayyid, M, 2011
)
1.09
"Pravastatin treatment reduced hypertension (change in mean arterial pressure: 1±1 versus 18±3 mm Hg in C1q(-/-) untreated mice), and albuminuria (of creatinine) was reduced from 820±175 to 117±45 μg/mg (both P<0.01)."( Role of complement component C1q in the onset of preeclampsia in mice.
Ahmed, A; Girardi, G; Singh, J, 2011
)
1.09
"Pravastatin treatment was associated with a significantly reduced late in-stent neointima formation as assessed at IVUS."( The extent of late in-stent neointima formation is modified by treatment with pravastatin: a preliminary study with intravascular ultrasound.
Bernardi, G; Boccanelli, A; Fioretti, P; Morocutti, G; Pagano, A; Parma, A; Prati, F; Sommariva, L; Tomai, F, 2002
)
1.99
"Pravastatin treatment significantly reduced plasma total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, as well as increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol."( Association of pravastatin and left ventricular mass in hypercholesterolemic patients: role of 8-iso-prostaglandin f2alpha formation.
Chou, TF; Lee, TM; Tsai, CH, 2002
)
1.39
"pravastatin treatment inhibits the prothrombogenic effects of hypercholesterolemia via an action on both endothelial cells and platelets; and 3)."( HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor attenuates platelet adhesion in intestinal venules of hypercholesterolemic mice.
Granger, DN; Lefer, DJ; Tailor, A, 2004
)
1.04
"Pravastatin treatment reduced total cholesterol LDL-C and triglycerides significantly more in the highest CETP quartile."( Cholesteryl ester transfer protein concentration is associated with progression of atherosclerosis and response to pravastatin in men with coronary artery disease (REGRESS).
de Grooth, GJ; Jukema, JW; Kastelein, JJ; Klerkx, AH; Kuivenhoven, JA; Zwinderman, AH, 2004
)
1.25
"Pravastatin treatment prevented cardiomyocyte cell death following simulated hypoxia and reoxygenation (P < 0.01)."( Novel cardioprotective effects of pravastatin in human ventricular cardiomyocytes subjected to hypoxia and reoxygenation: beneficial effects of statins independent of endothelial cells.
Fedak, PW; Li, RK; Li, SH; Miriuka, S; Rao, V; Verma, S; Weisel, RD, 2004
)
1.32
"Pravastatin treatment, resulting in decreased LDL oxidation, did not improve myocardial perfusion reserve in subjects with type 1 diabetes."( Effect of pravastatin on low-density lipoprotein oxidation and myocardial perfusion in young adults with type 1 diabetes.
Ahotupa, M; Janatuinen, T; Knuuti, J; Nuutila, P; Raitakari, OT; Rönnemaa, T; Toikka, JO, 2004
)
2.17
"Pravastatin treatment alone led to a significant, but partial improvement of hyperlipidemia and renal disease."( AT-1 receptor blockade prevents proteinuria, renal failure, hyperlipidemia, and glomerulosclerosis in the Imai rat.
Quiroz, Y; Rodríguez-Iturbe, B; Sato, T; Vaziri, ND, 2004
)
1.04
"Pravastatin treatment inhibits early plaque rupture and is also effective when begun after unstable plaques have developed."( Plaque rupture after short periods of fat feeding in the apolipoprotein E-knockout mouse: model characterization and effects of pravastatin treatment.
Angelini, G; Carson, K; George, S; Jackson, C; Johnson, J; Karanam, S; Newby, A; Williams, H, 2005
)
1.26
"Pravastatin treatment lowered the incidence of major adverse cardiac events in subjects with the metabolic syndrome after adjustment for age and sex (hazard ratio=0.39; 95% CI 0.17-0.89; P=0.025)."( Impact of statins in microalbuminuric subjects with the metabolic syndrome: a substudy of the PREVEND Intervention Trial.
Asselbergs, FW; Bakker, SJ; de Jong, PE; Geluk, CA; Hillege, HL; van Gilst, WH; Zijlstra, F, 2005
)
1.05
"Pravastatin treatment decreased total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides levels by 24%, 32%, and 14%, respectively ( P < .05 for all), but did not affect glucose and insulin levels, the (QUICKI) index, and adiponectin and leptin levels. "( Pravastatin does not affect insulin sensitivity and adipocytokines levels in healthy nondiabetic patients.
Amm-Azar, M; Azar, RR; Gannagé-Yared, MH; Germanos-Haddad, M; Halaby, G; Khalifé, S; Neemtallah, R, 2005
)
3.21
"Pravastatin treatment reduced endothelial nitric oxide synthase protein levels and reversed the renal dysfunction caused by CsA."( Inhibitory effect of pravastatin on transforming growth factor beta1-inducible gene h3 expression in a rat model of chronic cyclosporine nephropathy.
Cha, JH; Choi, BS; Kim, IS; Kim, J; Lee, SH; Li, C; Lim, SW; Yang, CW,
)
1.17
"The pravastatin-treated rabbits showed, compared with untreated rabbits, a significantly reduced LOX-1 protein and mRNA expression in the aortic arch."( Pravastatin inhibits expression of lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 (LOX-1) in Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits: a new pleiotropic effect of statins.
Eschert, H; Hofnagel, O; Luechtenborg, B; Robenek, H; Severs, NJ; Weissen-Plenz, G, 2006
)
2.26
"Pravastatin treatment was continued or started in the remaining members of group A and group B, but not in group C."( [The effects of pravastatin on platelet-derived nitric oxide system in rabbits].
Feng, JH; Kang, MF; Li, YQ; Ma, LP; Nie, DN; Wu, YD; Xie, SF; Xu, LZ; Yin, SM, 2005
)
1.4
"Pravastatin treatment increases the markers of cholesterol absorption and decreases those of cholesterol synthesis in HeFH during simultaneous inhibition of cholesterol absorption. "( Serum noncholesterol sterols in children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia undergoing pravastatin therapy.
Antikainen, M; Gylling, H; Hedman, M; Ketomäki, A; Miettinen, TA, 2006
)
1.99
"Pravastatin treatment also significantly increased neurite length and branching but did not affect cellular cholesterol levels."( The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl co-enzyme A reductase inhibitor pravastatin enhances neurite outgrowth in hippocampal neurons.
Pooler, AM; Wurtman, RJ; Xi, SC, 2006
)
1.29
"Pravastatin pretreatment resulted in a significantly better neurological outcome and reduced infarct size (15 +/- 0.5 and 59 +/- 10 mm(3), respectively) compared with controls (12.25 +/- 0.4 and 167 +/- 13 mm(3), respectively, P < 0.01 for both)."( Pravastatin reduces microvascular basal lamina damage following focal cerebral ischemia and reperfusion.
Dichgans, M; Hamann, GF; Trinkl, A; Vosko, MR; Wunderlich, N, 2006
)
2.5
"Pravastatin treatment significantly reduced systolic BP (SBP) in the HT group (134+/-16 to 130+/-13 mmHg, p<0.005) but not in the NT group (124+/-10 to 123+/-9 mmHg, p=0.52), despite the fact that treatment significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in both groups (HT group 178+/-27 to 132+/-17 mg/dl, p<0.0001; NT group 169+/-27 to 125+/-21 mg/dl, p<0.0001)."( Pravastatin decreases blood pressure in hypertensive and hypercholesterolemic patients receiving antihypertensive treatment.
Kawano, H; Yano, K, 2006
)
2.5
"Pravastatin treatment significantly decreased levels of total cholesterol (16%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (23%) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (37%) (p<0.01, respectively)."( Pravastatin improved glucose metabolism associated with increasing plasma adiponectin in patients with impaired glucose tolerance and coronary artery disease.
Fukushima, H; Funahashi, T; Horibata, Y; Koga, H; Kojima, S; Kugiyama, K; Maruyoshi, H; Ogawa, H; Otsuka, F; Sakamoto, T; Shimomura, I; Sugamura, K; Sugiyama, S; Watanabe, K, 2007
)
2.5
"The pravastatin-treated mice had delayed onset of CIA compared with the controls."( Effects of pravastatin in murine collagen-induced arthritis.
Funauchi, M; Ikoma, S; Kinoshita, K; Nozaki, Y; Sugiyama, M; Yamagata, T, 2007
)
1.21
"Pravastatin treatment attenuated the development of diabetes in db/db and high fat/high sucrose diet-fed C57BL/6J mice."( Effect of pravastatin on the development of diabetes and adiponectin production.
Abe, M; Caslake, MJ; Fukuhara, A; Funahashi, T; Kihara, S; Kobayashi, H; Komuro, R; Matsuda, M; McMahon, A; Shepherd, J; Shimomura, I; Takagi, T, 2008
)
1.47
"Pravastatin treatment significantly decreased plasma lipids in all patients (P < 0.001). "( SLCO1B1 521T-->C functional genetic polymorphism and lipid-lowering efficacy of multiple-dose pravastatin in Chinese coronary heart disease patients.
Chen, BL; Deng, S; Fan, L; He, YJ; Ozdemir, V; Peng, DD; Wang, A; Wang, LC; Xie, QY; Xie, W; Xu, LY; Zhang, W; Zhou, G; Zhou, HH, 2007
)
2
"Pravastatin treatment restored these sub-clinical abnormalities towards normal levels."( Two-week treatment with pravastatin improves ventriculo-vascular haemodynamic interactions in young men with type 1 diabetes.
Bouchier-Hayes, DJ; Casey, RG; Fitzgerald, P; Joyce, M; Moore, K; Thompson, C, 2007
)
1.37
"The pravastatin treatment effectively lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in the hyperlipidemic diabetic patients to levels nearly to those in 11 non-hyperlipidemic type 2 diabetic patients with normoalbuminuria."( Effects of long-term pravastatin treatment on serum and urinary monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 levels and renal function in type 2 diabetic patients with normoalbuminuria.
Fujita, H; Ito, S; Kakei, M; Koshimura, J; Miura, T; Morii, T; Narita, T; Sasaki, H; Sato, T; Yamada, Y, 2007
)
1.14
"Pravastatin treatment, at 10 mg or 40 mg daily for 8 weeks, reduced serum lipids and some inflammatory markers in nondiabetic hypercholesterolemic subjects. "( Early Improvements in insulin sensitivity and inflammatory markers are induced by pravastatin in nondiabetic subjects with hypercholesterolemia.
Chien, YH; Lee, WJ; Lee, WL; Liang, KW; Sheu, WH; Tang, YJ; Tsou, SS, 2008
)
2.01
"Pravastatin-treated patients with a greater percent decrease in hs-CRP had a significant improvement in exercise time compared with those without hs-CRP decrease."( Usefulness of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 as predictors of outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease receiving pravastatin.
Chang, NC; Lee, TM; Lin, MS, 2008
)
1.27
"Pravastatin treatment significantly reduced plasma levels of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol by 15.6 mg/dl (38.8%) and 12.7 mg/dl (42.9%), respectively."( Pravastatin-induced changes in receptor-mediated metabolism of low density lipoprotein in guinea pigs.
Arakawa, K; Araki, K; Hidaka, K; Matsunaga, A; Moriyama, K; Sasaki, J; Takada, Y, 1994
)
2.45
"Pravastatin treatment reduced plasma total cholesterol (-20 +/- 3%), LDL cholesterol (-30 +/- 3%), triacylglycerols (-17 +/- 6%), and apoB levels (-25 +/- 4%) and simultaneously decreased platelet [Ca2+]i measured in a low-Ca2+ medium by 14 +/- 6% (P = .03)."( Platelet cytosolic Ca2+ and membrane dynamics in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Effects of pravastatin.
Devynck, MA; Le Quan Sang, KH; Levenson, J; Megnien, JL; Simon, A, 1995
)
1.23
"Pravastatin treatment attenuated the increase in both malondialdehyde, beta-thromboglobulin and the prostanoids, but not to the level of normal subjects."( Effects of acute exercise on the changes of lipid profiles and peroxides, prostanoids, and platelet activation in hypercholesterolemic patients before and after treatment.
Chen, MF; Hsu, HC; Lee, YT, 1994
)
1.01
"Pravastatin treatment, which continued for 4 weeks, significantly decreased LDL cholesterol (P < 0.01); however, before LDL-apheresis pravastatin treatment significantly increased Lp(a) levels (P < 0.05) in a small number (n = 6) of the FH patients, who had been regularly treated with LDL-apheresis."( Reduction of lipoprotein(a) by LDL-apheresis using a dextran sulfate cellulose column in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia.
Haraki, T; Inazu, A; Kajinami, K; Kamon, N; Koizumi, I; Koizumi, J; Miyamoto, S; Takegoshi, T; Uno, Y; Yagi, K, 1993
)
1.01
"Pravastatin treatment of hypercholesterolemia is highly effective and well tolerated alone and in combination with bile acid-binding resin and shows no tendency to increase muscle enzyme levels."( Comparative efficacy and safety of pravastatin and cholestyramine alone and combined in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Pravastatin Multicenter Study Group II.
, 1993
)
2.01
"Pravastatin-treated rats never showed signs of myopathy."( Differential effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors on the development of myopathy in young rats.
Bär, PR; Bredman, JJ; Joles, JA; Koot, RW; Reijneveld, JC, 1996
)
1.02
"Pravastatin treatment (20 mg/day) was started at the 8th week of the study and its dose was doubled 4 weeks later if needed."( Combined treatment with captopril, hydrochlorothiazide and pravastatin in dyslipidemic hypertensive patients.
Darioli, R; Greminger, P; Riesen, W; Simeon-Dubach, D; Waeber, B; Wunderlin, R, 1995
)
1.26
"Pravastatin-treatment for 1, 7 and 28 days did not affect the recovery of cholesterol and triacylglycerols during 24 h after the lipid administration: the recovery was 52-59% and 82-93% for cholesterol and triacylglycerols, respectively."( Lymphatic transport of cholesterol in normocholesterolemic rats treated with pravastatin, an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase.
Ibi, T; Ikeda, I; Imaizumi, K; Nagao, K; Sakono, M; Yamamoto, K, 1996
)
1.24
"Pravastatin treatment of combined hyperlipidemia lowers low-density lipoprotein effectively; nicotinic acid lowers remnant cholesterol and raises high-density lipoprotein. "( Comparison of pravastatin with crystalline nicotinic acid monotherapy in treatment of combined hyperlipidemia.
Grundy, SM; Mostaza, JM; Schulz, I; Vega, GL, 1997
)
2.1
"Pravastatin- and placebo-treated patients were classified as having progressing, regressing or stable CAD, and median lipoprotein(a) concentrations were compared."( Modulation of lipoprotein(a) atherogenicity by high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in middle-aged men with symptomatic coronary artery disease and normal to moderately elevated serum cholesterol. Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS)
Bruschke, AV; Cobbaert, C; Jukema, JW; Lindemans, J; Withagen, AJ; Zwinderman, AH, 1997
)
1.02
"Pravastatin treatment did not affect serum apolipoprotein(a) levels. "( Modulation of lipoprotein(a) atherogenicity by high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in middle-aged men with symptomatic coronary artery disease and normal to moderately elevated serum cholesterol. Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS)
Bruschke, AV; Cobbaert, C; Jukema, JW; Lindemans, J; Withagen, AJ; Zwinderman, AH, 1997
)
1.74
"Pravastatin treatment did not induce a significant change in high-density (HDL) cholesterol levels."( Pravastatin in diabetes-associated hypercholesterolemia.
Janssens, EN; Rustemeijer, C; Schouten, JA; Spooren, PF; van Doormaal, JJ, 1997
)
2.46
"The pravastatin-treated groups also had fewer graft-infiltrating macrophages, specifically within the arterial intima and perivascular areas."( Effects of pravastatin on chronic rejection of rat cardiac allografts.
Busuttil, RW; Imagawa, DK; Kaldas, F; Ke, B; Maggard, MA; Seu, P; Wang, T, 1998
)
1.17
"Pravastatin-treated heart transplant recipients exhibited a decrease in natural killer cell cytotoxicity (9.8% mean natural killer cell cytotoxicity vs 22.1% in the control group, p < 0.01). "( The inhibitory effects of pravastatin on natural killer cell activity in vivo and on cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity in vitro.
Chia, D; Hirata, M; Katznelson, S; Kobashigawa, JA; Ozawa, M; Terasaki, PI; Wang, XM; Zhong, HP, 1998
)
2.04
"Pravastatin treatment effect was defined as the difference in progression of the combined intima-media thicknesses (IMT) between treatment groups."( B-mode ultrasound assessment of pravastatin treatment effect on carotid and femoral artery walls and its correlations with coronary arteriographic findings: a report of the Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS).
Ackerstaff, RG; Bom, N; Bruschke, AV; de Groot, E; Jukema, JW; Lie, KI; Montauban van Swijndregt, AD; van der Steen, AF; Zwinderman, AH, 1998
)
1.31
"Pravastatin treatment effects were highly significant (combined IMT: p = 0.0085; combined far wall IMT: p < 0.0001; common femoral artery far wall IMT: p = 0.004). "( B-mode ultrasound assessment of pravastatin treatment effect on carotid and femoral artery walls and its correlations with coronary arteriographic findings: a report of the Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS).
Ackerstaff, RG; Bom, N; Bruschke, AV; de Groot, E; Jukema, JW; Lie, KI; Montauban van Swijndregt, AD; van der Steen, AF; Zwinderman, AH, 1998
)
2.03
"Pravastatin treatment effects on carotid and femoral artery walls were observed. "( B-mode ultrasound assessment of pravastatin treatment effect on carotid and femoral artery walls and its correlations with coronary arteriographic findings: a report of the Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS).
Ackerstaff, RG; Bom, N; Bruschke, AV; de Groot, E; Jukema, JW; Lie, KI; Montauban van Swijndregt, AD; van der Steen, AF; Zwinderman, AH, 1998
)
2.03
"Pravastatin treatment reduced the absolute risk of coronary events for the diabetic and nondiabetic patients by 8.1% and 5.2% and the relative risk by 25% (P=0.05) and 23% (P<0.001), respectively."( Cardiovascular events and their reduction with pravastatin in diabetic and glucose-intolerant myocardial infarction survivors with average cholesterol levels: subgroup analyses in the cholesterol and recurrent events (CARE) trial. The Care Investigators.
Braunwald, E; Cole, TG; Davis, BR; Goldberg, RB; Howard, BV; Howard, WJ; Mellies, MJ; Moyé, LA; Pfeffer, MA; Sacks, FM, 1998
)
1.28
"Pravastatin treatment at 100 mg/kg did not produce any alteration of excitation-contraction coupling since the rheobase voltage was similar to that of controls."( Effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on excitation-contraction coupling of rat skeletal muscle.
Camerino, C; Conte Camerino, D; De Luca, A; Liantonio, A; Pierno, S, 1999
)
1.02
"Pravastatin treatment did not affect IS or the effect of IP under normocholesterolemia."( Pravastatin restored the infarct size-limiting effect of ischemic preconditioning blunted by hypercholesterolemia in the rabbit model of myocardial infarction.
Asanuma, H; Hori, M; Kitakaze, M; Komamura, K; Kuzuya, T; Minamino, T; Sato, H; Takeda, H; Ueda, Y, 1999
)
2.47
"Pravastatin treatment was more effective in reducing total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, LDL-triglycerides, LDL-ApoB and LDL/HDL-cholesterol ratio (all p<0.001 between groups) and total/HDL-cholesterol and ApoA1/LDL-ApoB ratios (both p<0.01) and always induced a decrease in LDL-cholesterol concentrations and LDL/HDL-cholesterol ratio irrespective of baseline triglyceride concentration. "( Pravastatin compared to bezafibrate in the treatment of dyslipidemia in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Donker, AJ; Heine, RJ; Hensgens, HE; Rustemeijer, C; Schouten, JA; Voerman, HJ,
)
3.02
"Pravastatin treatment is superior in lowering cholesterol-enriched lipoprotein subpopulations and improving cardiovascular risk factors. "( Pravastatin compared to bezafibrate in the treatment of dyslipidemia in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Donker, AJ; Heine, RJ; Hensgens, HE; Rustemeijer, C; Schouten, JA; Voerman, HJ,
)
3.02
"Pravastatin-treated patients were grouped according to the LDL-C reduction at 6 months; (i) "adequate LDL-C reduction": LDL-C reduction >30% from baseline or LDL-C<125 mg/dl (n = 38; LDL-C reduction 74 +/- 4 mg/dl; 6-month LDL-C 119 +/- 5 mg/dl); (ii) "inadequate LDL-C reduction": neither of the above criteria (n = 19; LDL-C reduction 31 +/- 5 mg/dl; 6-month LDL-C 158 +/- 6 mg/dl)."( Pravastatin: an antithrombotic effect independent of the cholesterol-lowering effect.
Ambrose, JA; Badimon, JJ; Cohen, AM; Dangas, G; Fallon, JT; Fier, C; Meraj, P; Shao, JH; Smith, DA; Unger, AH, 2000
)
2.47
"the pravastatin treated group was stratified into quartiles of LDL-C reduction."( Intima-media thickness after pravastatin stabilizes also in patients with moderate to no reduction in LDL-cholesterol levels: the carotid atherosclerosis Italian ultrasound study.
Baldassarre, D; Bong, MG; Collatina, S; Crepaldi, G; Fisicaro, M; Gallus, G; Gobbi, C; Mancini, M; Ricci, G; Rimondi, S; Sirtori, CR; Veglia, F; Ventura, A, 2000
)
1.08
"Pravastatin treatment is effective in reducing coronary heart disease events in patients with high or low risk factor status and across a wide range of pretreatment lipid concentrations."( Effect of pravastatin on coronary disease events in subgroups defined by coronary risk factors: the Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project.
Braunwald, E; Byington, R; Cobbe, S; Furberg, CD; Hawkins, CM; Keech, A; Packard, C; Sacks, FM; Shepherd, J; Simes, J; Tonkin, AM, 2000
)
2.15
"Pravastatin treatment did not significantly affect PChE activity."( Is pseudocholinesterase activity related to markers of triacylglycerol synthesis in Type II diabetes mellitus?
Beynen, AC; Donker, AJ; Heine, RJ; Rustemeijer, C; Schouten, JA; Voerman, HJ, 2001
)
1.03
"Pravastatin treatment increased PINP levels, a marker of bone formation, in hypercholesterolemic, post-menopausal women, without affecting bone resorption. "( Pravastatin therapy increases procollagen I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), a marker of bone formation in post-menopausal women.
Curiel, MD; De la Piedra, C; Lahoz, C; Mostaza, JM; Peña, R, 2001
)
3.2
"As pravastatin treatment had no effect on LDL size, it is suggested that the additional effect of fenofibrate therapy on LDL size may contribute to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) beyond what can be expected from the reduction in LDL cholesterol concentration in type IIa dyslipidemic patients."( A 16-week fenofibrate treatment increases LDL particle size in type IIA dyslipidemic patients.
Bourgeois, J; Després, JP; Dzavik, V; Laperrière, L; Lemieux, I; Tremblay, G, 2002
)
0.94
"Pravastatin treatment results in a 43% decrease in plasma triglycerides in NAR, but not in Sprague-Dawley (SDR) rats, and had no significant effect on plasma total cholesterol, phospholipids apolipoproteins A-I, A-IV, B, or E, as well as on plasma LCAT activity levels in NAR or SDR."( Hyperlipoproteinemia in Nagase analbuminemic rats: effects of pravastatin on plasma (apo)lipoproteins and lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase activity.
Jansen, EH; Joles, JA; Koomans, HA; Van Tol, A, 1991
)
1.24
"Pravastatin treatment did not adversely affect serum glucose levels."( The effect of pravastatin on serum cholesterol levels in hypercholesterolemic diabetic rabbits.
Arbeeny, CM; Bergquist, KE, 1991
)
1.36
"Pravastatin treatment however, did not result in a reduction in the LDL esterified/free cholesterol ratio or in the changes in cellular cholesterol synthesis and its regulation by LDL which accompanied simvastatin treatment."( Hypercholesterolaemia: simvastatin and pravastatin alter cholesterol metabolism by different mechanisms.
Collins, P; Johnson, A; Owens, D; Robinson, K; Tighe, O; Tomkin, GH, 1991
)
1.27
"Pravastatin treatment (n = 6) decreased LDL cholesterol (-27%), lathosterol (-46%), and ubiquinone (-29%)."( Effects of pravastatin and cholestyramine on products of the mevalonate pathway in familial hypercholesterolemia.
Angelin, B; Berglund, L; Dallner, G; Elmberger, PG; Eriksson, M; Kalén, A; Lund, E; Reihnér, E, 1991
)
1.39
"Pravastatin treatment also significantly decreased concentrations of apo B in LDL, IDL, and VLDL."( Pravastatin therapy in primary moderate hypercholesterolaemia: changes in metabolism of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins.
Grundy, SM; Krauss, RM; Vega, GL, 1990
)
2.44
"Pravastatin treatment resulted in lowering serum total cholesterol by 22.1% on the average (p less than 0.001), and led to a significant reduction in urinary excretion of albumin and beta 2-microglobulin in patients with an elevated urinary protein excretion rate at the baseline period."( Amelioration of proteinuria with pravastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients with diabetes mellitus.
Ikeda, Y; Kurata, H; Nomura, K; Sasaki, T; Utsunomiya, K,
)
1.13
"35 pravastatin-treated patients with familial hypercholesterolemia were included in an ocular drug-safety study. "( Ocular drug-safety study with the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor pravastatin.
Hockwin, O; Schmidt, J; Schmitt, C, 1990
)
1.14
"Treatment with pravastatin did not reduce sPLA2-IIA mass or sPLA2 activity levels, as compared to placebo."( Statin therapy and secretory phospholipase A₂ in children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.
Braamskamp, MJ; Hutten, BA; Kastelein, JJ; Tsimikas, S; Wiegman, A, 2013
)
0.73
"Treatment with pravastatin plus ezetimibe decreases the CIMT with improvement in the concentration of total cholesterol, LDL-C and CRP levels with good toleration."( [Effect of pravastatine plus ezetimibe on carotid intima media thickness in patients with lupus erythematosus].
Ángeles-Garay, U; Carrillo-González, AL; Hernández, C; Jara, L; Medina, G; Olvera-Acevedo, A; Peralta-Amaro, AL; Vera-Lastra, OL, 2015
)
1.16
"Upon treatment with Pravastatin reduced platelet LOX-1 expression induced by ADP."( Pravastatin and C reactive protein modulate protease- activated receptor-1 expression in vitro blood platelets.
Chu, LX; He, LP; Liang, ZS; Mo, CG; Qin, YQ; Wang, XD; Xie, J; Yang, F; Zhou, SX, 2016
)
2.19
"Treatment with pravastatin (100mg/kg) decreased total and LDL cholesterol only in the LCHP group, but displayed a pronounced anti-atherosclerotic effect in BCA and abdominal aorta. "( Anti-atherosclerotic effects of pravastatin in brachiocephalic artery in comparison with en face aorta and aortic roots in ApoE/LDLR
Baranska, M; Chlopicki, S; Czyzynska-Cichon, I; Drahun, A; Franczyk-Zarow, M; Gasior-Glogowska, M; Jasztal, A; Kostogrys, RB; Kus, E; Manterys, A; Wrobel, TP, 2017
)
1.09
"Pretreatment with pravastatin significantly ameliorated renal dysfunction and apoptosis and improved renal morphology and survival."( Pravastatin attenuates carboplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in rodents via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha-regulated heme oxygenase-1.
Chen, HH; Chen, TW; Lin, H, 2010
)
2.13
"Treatment with pravastatin decreased the contractile responses to phenylephrine (maximal effect [mean+/-standard error of the mean] 137.35+/- 27.70 compared with 42.24+/-8.76; P=.006) for sFlt-1 compared with sFlt-1-pravastatin, respectively."( Using pravastatin to improve the vascular reactivity in a mouse model of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-induced preeclampsia.
Bytautiene, E; Costantine, MM; Hankins, GDV; Longo, M; Lu, F; Saade, GR; Tamayo, E, 2010
)
1.18
"Treatment with pravastatin or fenofibrate improves the atherogenic lipid profile within the first 12 weeks and is sustained through 48 weeks with combination therapy. "( Treatment with pravastatin and fenofibrate improves atherogenic lipid profiles but not inflammatory markers in ACTG 5087.
Aberg, JA; Evans, SR; Fichtenbaum, CJ; Yeh, TM,
)
0.84
"Treatment with pravastatin markedly increased aggregation amplitude and γIsc max values and significantly decreased erythrocyte deformability but did not change plasma viscosity in 2 weeks time."( Effects of pravastatin on cellular ultrastructure and hemorheology in rats after traumatic head injury.
Basak, AT; Berker, M; Dikmenoglu, N; Hazer, DB; Ileri-Gurel, E; Kaymaz, F; Narin, F; Seringec, N; Tuncel, M, 2010
)
1.09
"Treatment with pravastatin reduced the frequency and duration of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation (VT/VF) and improved the arrhythmia score after reperfusion."( Cardioprotective effects of pravastatin against lethal ventricular arrhythmias induced by reperfusion in the rat heart.
Ezaki, K; Fukui, A; Hara, M; Kume, O; Miyazaki, H; Nakagawa, M; Nishio, S; Saikawa, T; Takahashi, N; Teshima, Y; Thuc, LC; Yufu, K, 2011
)
1
"Pretreatment with pravastatin (25 mg/kg) for 5 days significantly decreased both CTS and PTS."( Pravastatin attenuates noise-induced cochlear injury in mice.
Choung, YH; Jou, I; Kim, SW; Park, JS; Park, K; Park, SM, 2012
)
2.15
"Treatment with pravastatin of stimulated human chondrocytes leads to significant down-regulation of selected MMP genes and a non-significant reduction in MMP enzyme activity. "( Pravastatin suppresses matrix metalloproteinase expression and activity in human articular chondrocytes stimulated by interleukin-1β.
Baker, JF; Byrne, DP; Mulhall, KJ; Walsh, PM, 2012
)
2.17
"Treatment with pravastatin reduced the combined risk of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction by 31%. "( The anatomy of a clinical trial. The West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study.
Gaw, A; Shepherd, J, 2002
)
0.67
"Treatment with pravastatin reduced non-haemorrhagic stroke by 23% (P = 0.016) when considered alone, and 21% (P = 0.024) after adjustment for other risk factors."( Risk factors for non-haemorrhagic stroke in patients with coronary heart disease and the effect of lipid-modifying therapy with pravastatin.
Anderson, NE; Hankey, GJ; Hunt, D; Kirby, A; Simes, RJ; Tonkin, AM; Watson, JD; West, MJ; White, HD; Wonders, S, 2002
)
0.86
"Treatment with pravastatin resulted in significant additional benefit after allowance for risk factors."( Risk factors for non-haemorrhagic stroke in patients with coronary heart disease and the effect of lipid-modifying therapy with pravastatin.
Anderson, NE; Hankey, GJ; Hunt, D; Kirby, A; Simes, RJ; Tonkin, AM; Watson, JD; West, MJ; White, HD; Wonders, S, 2002
)
0.86
"Treatment with pravastatin was associated with the development of collateral circulation in patients with CAD, suggesting that such action constitutes part of the pleiotropic effects of statin."( Pravastatin promotes coronary collateral circulation in patients with coronary artery disease.
Arai, H; Miura, S; Nishikawa, H; Saku, K; Shimomura, H; Tsuchiya, Y; Zhang, B, 2002
)
2.11
"Treatment with pravastatin (20-40 mg/day for 3 months) resulted in normalization of fasting levels of blood lipids and decreased postprandial hyperlipidemia due to of enhanced removal of triglyceride-rich atherogenic lipoproteins from blood and their diminished secretion in response to fat load."( [Correction of atherogenic exogenously-induced postprandial hyperlipidemia with pravastatin].
Aronov, DM; Bubnova, MG; Golubev, MA; Mel'kina, OE; Olfer'ev, AM; Perova, NV; Zhasminova, VG, 2002
)
0.88
"Treatment with pravastatin 40 mg/day for 8 weeks had no effect on the levels of ADMA in hypercholesterolemic men."( Increased levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine in populations at risk for atherosclerotic disease. Effects of pravastatin.
Arnesen, H; Eid, HM; Eritsland, J; Larsen, J; Seljeflot, I, 2003
)
0.87
"Treatment with pravastatin (10 mg/day) was continued for 3 years."( Preventing angiographic progression of coronary atherosclerosis with pravastatin.
Ako, JY; Daida, H; Eto, M; Kurata, T; Mokuno, H; Nishide, T; Ouchi, Y; Saito, Y; Sato, H; Tango, T; Yamada, N; Yamaguchi, H, 2003
)
0.89
"Treatment with pravastatin did not show any significant changes."( Antioxidative potential of fluvastatin via the inhibition of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase activity.
Bandoh, T; Hoshi, K; Inoue, M; Mitani, H; Nakashima, A; Sato, EF, 2003
)
0.66
"Treatment with pravastatin in patients with both low LDL-C and low HDL-C significantly reduced major coronary events, stroke, and all-cause mortality. "( Effects of pravastatin on coronary events in 2073 patients with low levels of both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: results from the LIPID study.
Barter, P; Colquhoun, D; Glasziou, P; Hunt, D; Keech, A; Marschner, I; Simes, J; Tonkin, A; White, H, 2004
)
1.07
"Treatment with pravastatin did not result in a significant reduction in urinary albumin excretion or cardiovascular events."( Effects of fosinopril and pravastatin on cardiovascular events in subjects with microalbuminuria.
Asselbergs, FW; de Jong, PE; de Zeeuw, D; Diercks, GF; Hillege, HL; Janssen, WM; van Boven, AJ; van Gilst, WH; van Veldhuisen, DJ; Voors, AA, 2004
)
0.96
"Treatment with pravastatin (1 mmol/L) not only prevented the inhibition of endothelial function but also reversed the decrease of DDAH activity induced by AGE-BSA and normalized the alterations in nitrite/nitrate and MDA contents."( Pravastatin restores DDAH activity and endothelium-dependent relaxation of rat aorta after exposure to glycated protein.
Xiong, Y; Yin, QF, 2005
)
2.11
"Pretreatment with pravastatin significantly attenuated LPS-induced leucocyte-endothelial cell interactions (rolling velocity 89(6) per cent at 10 min, P = 0.038; adherent leucocytes 3.0(0.5) per 100 microm at 10 min, P = 0.038; migrating leucocytes 1.9(0.5) per field at 30 min, P = 0.001)."( Hydroxymethylglutaryl co-enzyme A reductase inhibition attenuates endotoxin-mediated inflammatory responses.
Bouchier-Hayes, DJ; Casey, R; Gang, C; Joyce, M; Kelly, CJ; Winter, D, 2005
)
0.65
"Pretreatment with pravastatin at 20 microM for 16 h substantially attenuated ceramide cytotoxicity in mouse CECs."( Pravastatin attenuates ceramide-induced cytotoxicity in mouse cerebral endothelial cells with HIF-1 activation and VEGF upregulation.
Chen, H; Chen, SD; Hsu, CY; Hu, CJ; Nassief, A; Xu, J; Yang, DI; Yin, K, 2005
)
2.09
"Treatment with pravastatin significantly reduced the incidence of transplant CAD (p = 0.05)."( Survival, graft atherosclerosis, and rejection incidence in heart transplant recipients treated with statins: 5-year follow-up.
Frazier, OH; Radovancevic, B; Radovancevic, R; Stojanovic, I; Thomas, CD; Vrtovec, B; Yazdanbakhsh, AP, 2005
)
0.67
"The treatment with pravastatin 40 mg once a day for 6 months does not affect brain cholesterol metabolism as judged by plasma concentrations of 24(S)-hydroxycholesterol."( Effect of pravastatin on plasma sterols and oxysterols in men.
Janatuinen, T; Knuuti, J; Laaksonen, R; Lehtimäki, T; Lütjohann, D; Thelen, KM; Vesalainen, R; von Bergmann, K, 2006
)
1.06
"Treatment with pravastatin at low to average dosages does not result in improved blood pressure regulation after kidney transplantation."( Effects of pravastatin treatment on blood pressure regulation after renal transplantation.
Lopau, K; Spindler, K; Wanner, C, 2006
)
1.08
"Treatment with pravastatin in women with elevated cholesterol but no history of cardiovascular disease provides a benefit similar to that seen in men, and this benefit is more marked in older women. "( Usefulness of pravastatin in primary prevention of cardiovascular events in women: analysis of the Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA study).
Kushiro, T; Mizuno, K; Nakamura, H; Nakaya, N; Ohashi, Y; Tajima, N; Teramoto, T; Uchiyama, S, 2008
)
1.06
"Treatment with pravastatin significantly reduced the incidence of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes without adversely affecting the risk of death from noncardiovascular causes in men with moderate hypercholesterolemia and no history of myocardial infarction."( Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group.
Cobbe, SM; Ford, I; Isles, CG; Lorimer, AR; MacFarlane, PW; McKillop, JH; Packard, CJ; Shepherd, J, 1995
)
0.91
"The treatment with pravastatin did not alter the FCR of the LDL receptor-independent pathway."( Pravastatin-induced changes in receptor-mediated metabolism of low density lipoprotein in guinea pigs.
Arakawa, K; Araki, K; Hidaka, K; Matsunaga, A; Moriyama, K; Sasaki, J; Takada, Y, 1994
)
2.05
"Treatment with pravastatin significantly reduced total-c (23.8%, p < 0.001), LDL-c (31.9%, p < 0.001) and triglyceride (16.9%, p < 0.001) levels, concomitantly those of HDL-c were significantly raised (15%, p < 0.001)."( The RED-LIP study--pravastatin in primary isolated hypercholesterolemia--an open, prospective, multicenter trial.
Pirich, C; Sinzinger, H, 1994
)
0.96
"Rats treated with pravastatin for 28 days had a higher lymphatic recovery of the lipids during 3-6 h after the lipid administration than did control rats."( Lymphatic transport of cholesterol in normocholesterolemic rats treated with pravastatin, an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase.
Ibi, T; Ikeda, I; Imaizumi, K; Nagao, K; Sakono, M; Yamamoto, K, 1996
)
0.85
"Treatment with pravastatin normalized thrombin generation."( Platelet-dependent thrombin generation in patients with hyperlipidemia.
Aoki, I; Aoki, N; Homori, M; Ishikawa, K; Kawai, Y; Kawano, K; Maki, A; Shimoyama, K; Yamamoto, M; Yanagisawa, A, 1997
)
0.64
"Treatment with pravastatin in a dose of 5 mg twice daily for 4 weeks resulted in lowering plasma total and LDL cholesterol levels by 17.0% and 22.9%, respectively."( Short-term treatment with low-dose pravastatin attenuates oxidative susceptibility of low-density lipoprotein in hypercholesterolemic patients.
Chen, MF; Hsu, HC; Lee, YT, 1997
)
0.91
"Treatment with pravastatin reduced the levels of total cholesterol by 19%, LDL cholesterol by 27%, apolipoprotein B by 19%, and triglycerides by 13% (all 2P<.0001) and increased apolipoprotein A1 and HDL cholesterol levels by 4% (both 2P<.0005), in comparison with placebo."( Effects of lowering average of below-average cholesterol levels on the progression of carotid atherosclerosis: results of the LIPID Atherosclerosis Substudy. LIPID Trial Research Group.
Gamble, G; Hart, H; MacMahon, S; Scott, J; Sharpe, N; Simes, J; White, H, 1998
)
0.64
"Treatment with pravastatin reduced the development of carotid atherosclerosis among patients with coronary heart disease and a wide range of pretreatment cholesterol levels. "( Effects of lowering average of below-average cholesterol levels on the progression of carotid atherosclerosis: results of the LIPID Atherosclerosis Substudy. LIPID Trial Research Group.
Gamble, G; Hart, H; MacMahon, S; Scott, J; Sharpe, N; Simes, J; White, H, 1998
)
0.65
"Treatment with pravastatin did not affect serum cholesterol levels or systolic blood pressure but did reduce the L-NAME induced inflammatory and proliferative changes."( Pravastatin attenuates cardiovascular inflammatory and proliferative changes in a rat model of chronic inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis by its cholesterol-lowering independent actions.
Egashira, K; Inoue, S; Kataoka, C; Kitamoto, S; Koyanagi, M; Ni, W; Takeshita, A, 2000
)
2.09
"Treatment with pravastatin, but not fluvastatin, preserved interstitial collagen content in vivo (detected by picrosirius red polarization)."( Statins alter smooth muscle cell accumulation and collagen content in established atheroma of watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits.
Aikawa, M; Enomoto, M; Fukumoto, Y; Hill, CC; Hirouchi, Y; Libby, P; Rabkin, E; Shiomi, M, 2001
)
0.65
"Pre-treatment with pravastatin attenuated this neutrophil infiltration and microvascular leakage."( Pravastatin attenuates lower torso ischaemia-reperfusion-induced lung injury by upregulating constitutive endothelial nitric oxide synthase.
Bouchier-Hayes, DJ; Chen, G; Joyce, M; Kelly, CJ, 2001
)
2.07
"Rats treated with pravastatin had a 22% reduction in GVD that did not reach statistical significance."( Fluvastatin in combination with rad significantly reduces graft vascular disease in rat cardiac allografts.
Berryman, ER; Gregory, CR; Griffey, SM; Katznelson, S; Kyles, AE, 2001
)
0.63
"Pretreatment with pravastatin significantly attenuated IR-induced renal injury, improving urine production to 0.62 (0.2) ml/h and GFR to 0.14 (0.02) ml/min and diminishing protein leakage to 3.76 (0.7) g/L at the 2-h time point."( Pravastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, attenuates renal injury in an experimental model of ischemia-reperfusion.
Bouchier-Hayes, D; Chen, G; Joyce, M; Kelly, C; Leahy, A; Winter, D, 2001
)
2.08
"Treatment with pravastatin over 5 years reduces all-cause mortality and coronary mortality in patients with and those without a history of coronary heart disease. "( Effects of pravastatin on mortality in patients with and without coronary heart disease across a broad range of cholesterol levels. The Prospective Pravastatin Pooling project.
Braunwald, E; Davis, BR; Ford, I; Furberg, CD; Shepherd, J; Simes, J; Tonkin, A, 2002
)
1.06
"Treatment with pravastatin 40 mg once daily reduced total and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) after 6 months by 19.7% and 25.4%, respectively (P less than .001)."( Pravastatin in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-lowering effect and LDL receptor activity on skin fibroblastS.
Arca, M; Calandra, S; Ciarrocchi, A; D'Alò, G; Descovich, GC; Fazio, S; Gaddi, A; Tiozzo, R, 1991
)
2.06
"Treatment with pravastatin resulted in a significant decrease in plasma cholesterol caused by a decrease in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) of 30% (p less than 0.005)."( Effect of pravastatin on biliary lipid composition and bile acid synthesis in familial hypercholesterolaemia.
de Rooy, FW; Hoogerbrugge-vd Linden, N; Jansen, H; van Blankenstein, M, 1990
)
1.02

Toxicity

Pravastatin appears to be an effective and safe lipid-lowering agent. The first 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor to be studied extensively in this underrepresented population.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"4%) developed adverse reactions, but interruption of the treatment was necessary in only 18 (0."( [An evaluation of the efficacy and safety of pravastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. A Brazilian open multicenter study].
Giannini, SD, 1992
)
0.54
" Adverse events were monitored."( Treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia with pravastatin: efficacy and safety over three years.
Clifton, P; Janus, ED; Nestel, PJ; Parfitt, A; Simons, J; Simons, LA, 1992
)
0.54
" Eight subjects allocated to pravastatin and seven allocated to resin withdrew (one and two subjects respectively because of drug-induced adverse events)."( Treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia with pravastatin: efficacy and safety over three years.
Clifton, P; Janus, ED; Nestel, PJ; Parfitt, A; Simons, J; Simons, LA, 1992
)
0.83
"Pravastatin was found to be a relatively effective, safe and well tolerated lipid-lowering drug."( Treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia with pravastatin: efficacy and safety over three years.
Clifton, P; Janus, ED; Nestel, PJ; Parfitt, A; Simons, J; Simons, LA, 1992
)
1.98
" Pravastatin was well tolerated and was associated with a low incidence of adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of pravastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. II. Once-daily versus twice-daily dosing.
Goldberg, AC; Hunninghake, DB; Insull, W; Kostis, JB; Kuo, PT; Mellies, MJ; Pan, HY; Schrott, HG, 1990
)
1.5
"Pravastatin appears to be an effective and safe lipid-lowering agent and is the first 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor to be studied extensively in this underrepresented population."( Efficacy and safety of pravastatin in African Americans with primary hypercholesterolemia.
Chin, MM; Curry, CL; Jacobson, TA; LaRosa, JC; Miller, V; Papademetriou, V; Schlant, RC, 1995
)
2.04
" No adverse effects requiring treatment discontinuation were observed for both drugs."( [Randomized, double-blind comparative study between pravastatin and lovastatin. Evaluation of efficacy and safety].
Bertolami, MC; Diament, J; Faludi, AA; Forti, N; Giannini, SD; Schölz, J, 1994
)
0.54
" Adverse events observed in 5 cases were always mild and reversible."( A multi-centre study of the efficacy and safety of pravastatin in hypercholesterolaemic patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Ando, S; Fujii, S; Hatao, K; Hatao, M; Inoue, Y; Kaku, K; Kaneko, T; Matsumura, S; Okubo, M, 1994
)
0.54
" Pravastatin was well tolerated, with an overall incidence of adverse events nearly identical to that of placebo."( Efficacy and safety of pravastatin in the long-term treatment of elderly patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Behounek, BD; Kobylak, L; Maciejko, JJ; McGovern, ME; Rosman, HS; Rubenfire, M; Santinga, JT, 1994
)
1.51
" The drug was very well tolerated, with an incidence of adverse events of only 10."( [Pravastatin: efficacy and safety in elderly patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Open multicenter study].
Diament, J; Giannini, SD, 1993
)
1.2
" The effects on the lipid fractions are significant, adverse effects are rare and the drug is very well tolerated."( [Pravastatin: efficacy and safety in elderly patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Open multicenter study].
Diament, J; Giannini, SD, 1993
)
1.2
" No other significant differences were observed between the pravastatin and the placebo-treated groups with regard to other adverse effects and to patient compliance and withdrawal."( Efficacy and safety of pravastatin once daily in primary moderate hypercholesterolemia: the Israeli experience.
Beigel, Y; Brook, G; Eisenberg, S; Fainaru, M; Harats, D; Levy, Y; Rubinstein, A; Skurnik, Y, 1993
)
0.84
" Adverse experiences were mild and did not differ between treatment groups; in each group, one subject discontinued medication because of complaints of dizziness."( Treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia. Short-term efficacy and safety of increasing doses of simvastatin and pravastatin: a double-blind comparative study.
De Haan, AF; Kastelein, JJ; Kortmann, B; Kroon, AA; Lansberg, PJ; Stalenhoef, AF; Stuyt, PM, 1993
)
0.5
"Between December 1989 and December 1992, the Netherlands Centre for Monitoring of Adverse Reactions to Drugs received 142 reports of suspected adverse reactions to simvastatin or pravastatin."( [Side effects of cholesterol synthesis inhibitors].
Stricker, BH; Wolterbeek, R, 1993
)
0.48
" There was no significant difference between groups in the frequency of drug-related adverse experiences."( Comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of simvastatin and pravastatin for hypercholesterolemia. The Simvastatin Pravastatin Study Group.
, 1993
)
0.52
" Relevant data on the incidence of adverse effects are presented."( Comparative evaluation of the safety and efficacy of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor monotherapy in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia.
Hsu, I; Johnson, NE; Spinler, SA,
)
0.13
" Results from this study confirmed that a low dose (10 mg) of pravastatin daily is a safe and effective method of reducing plasma total and LDL-cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive elderly patients who are on concurrent antihypertensive drug therapy."( The effectiveness and safety of low dose pravastatin in elderly hypertensive hypercholesterolemic subjects on antihypertensive therapy.
Chan, P; Ko, JT; Lee, CB; Lee, YS; Lin, TS; Pan, WH, 1995
)
0.8
" The results show that pravastatin was well tolerated and that adverse events were mild and equally distributed among the three treatment groups."( Short-term efficacy and safety of pravastatin in 72 children with familial hypercholesterolemia.
Bakker, HD; Boelen, CC; Büller, HR; Groenemeijer, BE; Kastelein, JJ; Knipscheer, HC; van den Ende, A; van Diermen, DE, 1996
)
0.88
" Adverse events and clinical laboratory abnormalities were generally mild and transient in all groups, and all but two patients finished the study."( Effectiveness and safety of low-dose pravastatin and squalene, alone and in combination, in elderly patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Chan, P; Lee, CB; Lee, YS; Tomlinson, B, 1996
)
0.57
" Safety was assessed by recording adverse events and measuring clinical laboratory parameters."( Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin compared to pravastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Bertolini, S; Bon, GB; Campbell, LM; Egros, F; Farnier, M; Fayyad, R; Langan, J; Mahla, G; Nawrocki, JW; Pauciullo, P; Sirtori, C, 1997
)
0.55
" Physical and laboratory investigations for adverse effects were performed every month for the first 3 months and every 3 months thereafter."( Safety and efficacy of long-term statin-fibrate combinations in patients with refractory familial combined hyperlipidemia.
Athyros, VG; Carina, MV; Didangelos, TP; Hatzikonstandinou, HA; Kontopoulos, AG; Kranitsas, DF; Papageorgiou, AA, 1997
)
0.3
"To assess the additional benefit gained from high compliance in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study and to examine cases where withdrawal from trial medication was due to an adverse event."( Compliance and adverse event withdrawal: their impact on the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study.
, 1997
)
0.3
" The adverse events associated with withdrawal were coded by body system."( Compliance and adverse event withdrawal: their impact on the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study.
, 1997
)
0.3
" Atorvastatin was well-tolerated, and no serious or medically important adverse events were observed."( Efficacy and safety of a new cholesterol synthesis inhibitor, atorvastatin, in comparison with simvastatin and pravastatin, in subjects with hypercholesterolemia.
Black, DM; Mahla, G; Muller, D; Pentrup, A; Wolffenbuttel, BH, 1998
)
0.51
"We conclude that atorvastatin is a safe and very efficacious cholesterol-lowering agent, which also possesses significant triglyceride-lowering properties."( Efficacy and safety of a new cholesterol synthesis inhibitor, atorvastatin, in comparison with simvastatin and pravastatin, in subjects with hypercholesterolemia.
Black, DM; Mahla, G; Muller, D; Pentrup, A; Wolffenbuttel, BH, 1998
)
0.51
" There was no significant difference between the incidence of adverse effects with cerivastatin and comparator statins or between cerivastatin and other statins with respect to clinically significant increases in either hepatic enzymes or creatine phosphokinase."( Clinical efficacy and safety of cerivastatin: summary of pivotal phase IIb/III studies.
Davignon, J; Hanefeld, M; Hunninghake, DB; Insull, W; Nakaya, N; Ose, L, 1998
)
0.3
"Pravastatin and gemfibrozil therapy is safe and efficacious in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia."( Long-term safety of pravastatin-gemfibrozil therapy in mixed hyperlipidemia.
Iliadis, EA; Rosenson, RS, 1999
)
2.07
" The frequency of treatment-associated adverse events (AEs) in the atorvastatin LDL-C < or =80 mg/dl (2."( Safety profile of atorvastatin-treated patients with low LDL-cholesterol levels.
Bakker-Arkema, RG; Black, DM; Nawrocki, JW, 2000
)
0.31
" Both drugs were well tolerated, with most adverse events being mild."( Efficacy and safety of cerivastatin and pravastatin in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia.
Ferdinand, K; Krug-Gourley, S; Poland, M; Saunders, E; Tonkon, MJ; Yellen, LG, 2000
)
0.57
" Overall, compliance was high and few adverse effects were reported."( Effective and safe modification of multiple atherosclerotic risk factors in patients with peripheral arterial disease.
Applegate, WB; Crouse, JR; Davis, KB; Egan, D; Elam, MB; Garg, R; Herd, JA; Hunninghake, DB; Johnson, WC; Kennedy, JW; Kostis, JB; Sheps, DS, 2000
)
0.31
"ADMIT demonstrates that it is both feasible and safe to modify multiple atherosclerotic disease risk factors effectively with intensive combination therapy in patients with PAD."( Effective and safe modification of multiple atherosclerotic risk factors in patients with peripheral arterial disease.
Applegate, WB; Crouse, JR; Davis, KB; Egan, D; Elam, MB; Garg, R; Herd, JA; Hunninghake, DB; Johnson, WC; Kennedy, JW; Kostis, JB; Sheps, DS, 2000
)
0.31
" Cerivastatin is safe and effective for patients with hypercholesterolemia who require aggressive LDL cholesterol lowering to achieve NCEP-recommended targets."( Randomized comparison of the efficacy and safety of cerivastatin and pravastatin in 1,030 hypercholesterolemic patients. The Cerivastatin Study Group.
Dujovne, CA; Hunninghake, D; Knopp, R; Kwiterovich, P; McBride, TA; Poland, M, 2000
)
0.54
" Pravastatin, a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, has been shown to be effective and safe for cholesterol reduction in adult heart transplant recipients."( Safety and efficacy of pravastatin therapy for the prevention of hyperlipidemia in pediatric and adolescent cardiac transplant recipients.
Fricker, FJ; Harker, K; Kahler, DA; Penson, MG; Schowengerdt, KO; Thompson, JR; Williams, BJ, 2001
)
1.53
"Pravastatin therapy is effective and safe when used in pediatric and adolescent cardiac transplant recipients."( Safety and efficacy of pravastatin therapy for the prevention of hyperlipidemia in pediatric and adolescent cardiac transplant recipients.
Fricker, FJ; Harker, K; Kahler, DA; Penson, MG; Schowengerdt, KO; Thompson, JR; Williams, BJ, 2001
)
2.06
"Muscle symptoms are known as adverse effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors but their incidence is reported to be low."( Shoulder stiffness: a common adverse effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in women?
Fujimura, A; Harada, K; Tsuruoka, S, 2001
)
0.31
"Potential cost differences between statins are driven primarily by drug costs, differential lowering effects on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, and adverse drug interactions and reactions."( Cerivastatin versus branded pravastatin in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia in primary care practice in Canada: a one-year, open-label, randomized, comparative study of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness.
Agro, A; Braeken, A; Hanna, K; McPherson, R, 2001
)
0.6
"6%) because of an adverse event."( Cerivastatin versus branded pravastatin in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia in primary care practice in Canada: a one-year, open-label, randomized, comparative study of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness.
Agro, A; Braeken, A; Hanna, K; McPherson, R, 2001
)
0.6
" Cerivastatin was well tolerated; the most commonly reported adverse events were arthralgia, headache, pharyngitis, and rhinitis."( Long-term efficacy and safety of cerivastatin 0.8 mg in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.
Brazg, R; Dujovne, CA; Insull, W; Isaacsohn, J; Kwiterovich, P; Patrick, MA; Ripa, S; Shan, M; Shugrue-Crowley, E; Stein, E; Tota, R, 2001
)
0.31
"Data from 185 patients were retrospectively evaluated for adverse events, duration of exposure (person-days), and the mean atorvastatin dose exposure."( Safety and efficacy of atorvastatin in heart transplant recipients.
Aaronson, KD; Baliga, RR; Cody, RJ; Dyke, DB; Koelling, TM; Lake, KD; Pagani, FD; Patel, DN, 2002
)
0.31
"Data from 185 patients were retrospectively evaluated for adverse events, duration of exposure (person-days), and the mean atorvastatin dose exposure."( Safety and efficacy of atorvastatin in heart transplant recipients.
Aaronson, KD; Baliga, RR; Cody, RJ; Dyke, DB; Koelling, TM; Lake, KD; Pagani, FD; Patel, DN, 2002
)
0.31
"Atorvastatin, when used at moderate doses and with close biochemical and clinical monitoring, appears to be safe and is effective in aggressively lowering LDL in heart transplant recipients when treatment with other statins has failed to achieve LDL goals."( Safety and efficacy of atorvastatin in heart transplant recipients.
Aaronson, KD; Baliga, RR; Cody, RJ; Dyke, DB; Koelling, TM; Lake, KD; Pagani, FD; Patel, DN, 2002
)
0.31
" Major cardiovascular events and adverse events were compared according to initial treatment assignment."( Long-term effectiveness and safety of pravastatin in 9014 patients with coronary heart disease and average cholesterol concentrations: the LIPID trial follow-up.
, 2002
)
0.59
" Pravastatin had no significant adverse effects."( Long-term effectiveness and safety of pravastatin in 9014 patients with coronary heart disease and average cholesterol concentrations: the LIPID trial follow-up.
, 2002
)
1.5
" Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events and measuring clinical laboratory parameters."( A randomized, double-blind trial comparing the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin versus pravastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.
Goto, Y; Hata, Y; Itakura, H; Mabuchi, H; Nakaya, N; Ogawa, N; Saito, Y; Sasaki, J; Teramoto, T; Tushima, M; Yamada, N, 2002
)
0.54
" No differences in noncardiovascular serious adverse events were detected."( Safety and tolerability of pravastatin in long-term clinical trials: prospective Pravastatin Pooling (PPP) Project.
Braunwald, E; Byington, RP; Cobbe, SM; Davis, BR; Friedman, CP; Keech, A; Pfeffer, MA; Sacks, FM; Tonkin, A, 2002
)
0.61
"This prospective analysis indicates that during prolonged exposure, 40 mg of pravastatin is well tolerated, with no excess of noncardiovascular serious adverse events, including liver function abnormalities and laboratory and clinical evidence for myositis."( Safety and tolerability of pravastatin in long-term clinical trials: prospective Pravastatin Pooling (PPP) Project.
Braunwald, E; Byington, RP; Cobbe, SM; Davis, BR; Friedman, CP; Keech, A; Pfeffer, MA; Sacks, FM; Tonkin, A, 2002
)
0.84
" No significant adverse effects were noted, and no complications with drug withdrawals occurred."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of pravastatin and simvastatin in heart transplantation.
DeGruiter, H; Lavie, CJ; Mehra, MR; Milani, RV; Uber, PA; Vivekananthan, K, 2002
)
0.58
"Simvastatin and pravastatin are safe and very effective in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol lowering in heart transplant recipients, with simvastatin being more efficacious than pravastatin in lipid lowering in this group of patients."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of pravastatin and simvastatin in heart transplantation.
DeGruiter, H; Lavie, CJ; Mehra, MR; Milani, RV; Uber, PA; Vivekananthan, K, 2002
)
0.93
" Data included medication use, clinic visits, adverse events, LDL-C and other laboratory measures."( An economic analysis of the Atorvastatin Comparative Cholesterol Efficacy and Safety Study (ACCESS).
McBurney, CR; Smith, DG, 2003
)
0.32
"Two years of pravastatin therapy induced a significant regression of carotid atherosclerosis in children with familial hypercholesterolemia, with no adverse effects on growth, sexual maturation, hormone levels, or liver or muscle tissue."( Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in children with familial hypercholesterolemia: a randomized controlled trial.
Bakker, HD; Büller, HR; de Groot, E; Hutten, BA; Kastelein, JJ; Rodenburg, J; Sijbrands, EJ; Wiegman, A, 2004
)
0.69
" When multiple doses of PV were given to EHBR without co-administration of any other compound, drug-induced skeletal muscle toxicity (myopathy/rhabdomyolysis) and increased creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level were observed, whereas a control experiment using SDR did not show any toxic change."( Eisai hyperbilirubinemic rat (EHBR) as an animal model affording high drug-exposure in toxicity studies on organic anions.
Kakinuma, C; Kuwayama, C; Naba, H; Ogihara, T; Ohnishi, S, 2004
)
0.32
" In conclusion, pravastatin treatment was safe and well tolerated."( Efficacy and safety of pravastatin in children and adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a prospective clinical follow-up study.
Antikainen, M; Föhr, A; Hedman, M; Lappi, M; Matikainen, T; Nuutinen, M; Piippo, S, 2005
)
0.99
" There were no severe adverse events caused by pravastatin."( A prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pravastatin for the treatment of refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease.
Chiba, S; Goyama, S; Hamaki, T; Hirai, H; Hori, A; Imataki, O; Kami, M; Kanda, Y; Kishi, Y; Kojima, R; Komeno, Y; Makimoto, A; Mitani, K; Ogawa, S; Onishi, Y; Sakiyama, M; Takaue, Y; Tanosaki, R, 2005
)
0.83
"The authors reviewed adverse events (AEs) reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration to determine the percentage of statin-associated AE reports with concurrent amiodarone use for simvastatin, atorvastatin, and pravastatin."( Adverse events with concomitant amiodarone and statin therapy.
Alsheikh-Ali, AA; Karas, RH, 2005
)
0.51
" There were few adverse events and no rhabdomyolysis reported."( A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of fenofibrate versus pravastatin in HIV-infected subjects with lipid abnormalities: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 5087.
Aberg, JA; Alston, BL; Brobst, SW; Evans, SR; Fichtenbaum, CJ; Glesby, MJ; Henry, WK; Owens, SI; Torriani, FJ; Yang, Y; Zackin, RA, 2005
)
0.56
"Compared with patients treated with an accepted LDL goal (80 to 100 mg/dl), there was no adverse effect on safety with lower achieved LDL levels, and apparent improved clinical efficacy."( Can low-density lipoprotein be too low? The safety and efficacy of achieving very low low-density lipoprotein with intensive statin therapy: a PROVE IT-TIMI 22 substudy.
Braunwald, E; Cannon, CP; Morrow, DA; Pfeffer, MA; Ray, KK; Wiviott, SD, 2005
)
0.33
" Adverse effects have been related to the use of certain statins, high statin dosages, comorbidities, and coadministration with cyclosporine."( Safety of statins when response is carefully monitored: a study of 336 heart recipients.
Aldama-López, G; Campo-Pérez, R; Castro-Beiras, A; Crespo-Leiro, MG; Llinares-García, D; Marzoa-Rivas, R; Muñiz-Garcia, J; Paniagua-Marin, MJ; Piñón-Esteban, P, 2005
)
0.33
"Between April 1991 and December 2003, we retrospectively evaluated 336 heart transplant patients (including 55 women) with regard to the occurrence of possible adverse effects of statins (rhabdomyolysis, myalgia, hepatotoxicity, high CK without muscle symptoms, and others)."( Safety of statins when response is carefully monitored: a study of 336 heart recipients.
Aldama-López, G; Campo-Pérez, R; Castro-Beiras, A; Crespo-Leiro, MG; Llinares-García, D; Marzoa-Rivas, R; Muñiz-Garcia, J; Paniagua-Marin, MJ; Piñón-Esteban, P, 2005
)
0.33
"Possible adverse events of statins were suffered by 60 patients, all of them men."( Safety of statins when response is carefully monitored: a study of 336 heart recipients.
Aldama-López, G; Campo-Pérez, R; Castro-Beiras, A; Crespo-Leiro, MG; Llinares-García, D; Marzoa-Rivas, R; Muñiz-Garcia, J; Paniagua-Marin, MJ; Piñón-Esteban, P, 2005
)
0.33
"Some 10% to 20% of HT patients appear to suffer adverse side effects of initial statin therapy."( Safety of statins when response is carefully monitored: a study of 336 heart recipients.
Aldama-López, G; Campo-Pérez, R; Castro-Beiras, A; Crespo-Leiro, MG; Llinares-García, D; Marzoa-Rivas, R; Muñiz-Garcia, J; Paniagua-Marin, MJ; Piñón-Esteban, P, 2005
)
0.33
"5 million adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports for 8620 drugs/biologics that are listed for 1191 Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction (COSTAR) terms of adverse effects."( Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
Benz, RD; Contrera, JF; Kruhlak, NL; Matthews, EJ; Weaver, JL, 2004
)
0.32
" Pravastatin was not toxic up to 1 mmol/l."( Toxicity of statins on rat skeletal muscle mitochondria.
Brecht, K; Kaufmann, P; Krähenbühl, S; Török, M; Waldhauser, KM; Zahno, A, 2006
)
1.24
" Current drug labeling warns of an increased risk of adverse events with statin and niacin combinations."( Safety of lovastatin/extended release niacin compared with lovastatin alone, atorvastatin alone, pravastatin alone, and simvastatin alone (from the United States Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system).
Alsheikh-Ali, AA; Karas, RH, 2007
)
0.56
"High-dose pravastatin (80 mg/day) administered to hypercholesterolemic subjects with chronic liver disease significantly lowered LDL-C, TC, and TGs in comparison with the placebo and was safe and well tolerated."( Efficacy and safety of high-dose pravastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients with well-compensated chronic liver disease: Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial.
Belder, R; Fusco, MJ; Lewis, JH; Medoff, JR; Mortensen, ME; Zweig, S, 2007
)
1.02
" The purpose of this study was to explore documented adverse effects of liver transplant recipients receiving lipid-lowering therapies."( Incidence of adverse events with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in liver transplant patients.
Aranda-Michel, J; Bass, M; Cavanaugh, TM; Hanaway, M; Martin, JE; Rudich, S; Trumbull, L; Weber, F,
)
0.13
"A retrospective chart review of 69 liver transplant patients was conducted to evaluate the incidence of adverse effects, especially rhabdomyolysis and liver function abnormalities, in liver transplant patients treated with a lipid lowering agent (LLA)."( Incidence of adverse events with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in liver transplant patients.
Aranda-Michel, J; Bass, M; Cavanaugh, TM; Hanaway, M; Martin, JE; Rudich, S; Trumbull, L; Weber, F,
)
0.13
" Six patients studied had adverse effects, five (7."( Incidence of adverse events with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in liver transplant patients.
Aranda-Michel, J; Bass, M; Cavanaugh, TM; Hanaway, M; Martin, JE; Rudich, S; Trumbull, L; Weber, F,
)
0.13
"Overall, there was a general tolerability with a low incidence of adverse events, no incidence of severe complications, and no alterations in liver function tests in the study population with the use of LLA."( Incidence of adverse events with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in liver transplant patients.
Aranda-Michel, J; Bass, M; Cavanaugh, TM; Hanaway, M; Martin, JE; Rudich, S; Trumbull, L; Weber, F,
)
0.13
"There is a discrepancy in the adverse effect of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors, statins between the clinical reports and the studies using skeletal muscle cell models."( Involvement of organic anion transporting polypeptides in the toxicity of hydrophilic pravastatin and lipophilic fluvastatin in rat skeletal myofibres.
Kimura, J; Mikami, H; Sakamoto, K, 2008
)
0.57
" CPK surveillance is recommended because of a slight continued risk of adverse effects."( The efficacy and safety of ezetimibe for treatment of dyslipidemia after heart transplantation.
Castro-Beiras, A; Crespo-Leiro, MG; Flores, X; Franco, R; Grille, Z; Marzoa, R; Mosquera, V; Naya, C; Paniagua, MJ; Rodriguez, JA, 2008
)
0.35
"3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are safe and well-tolerated therapeutic drugs."( Possible mechanisms underlying statin-induced skeletal muscle toxicity in L6 fibroblasts and in rats.
Ichihara, K; Itagaki, M; Kaneta, S; Kano, S; Satoh, K; Takaguri, A, 2009
)
0.35
" We defined a composite adverse event (CAE) as discontinuation for any side effect, myalgia, or CK >3x upper limit of normal during follow-up."( The SLCO1B1*5 genetic variant is associated with statin-induced side effects.
Ali, S; Ginsburg, GS; Reed, CR; Salisbury, BA; Shah, SH; Spasojevic, I; Voora, D, 2009
)
0.35
" Our findings thereby reveal a safe and efficient therapeutic opportunity for the abrogation of late thoracic radiation injury, potentially usable either before or after radiation exposure; this approach is especially attractive in (1) the radiation oncology setting, as it does not interfere with prior anti-cancer treatment and in (2) radioprotection, as applicable to the treatment of established radiation injury, for example in the case of radiation accidents or acts of terrorism."( Modulation of the Rho/ROCK pathway in heart and lung after thorax irradiation reveals targets to improve normal tissue toxicity.
Monceau, V; Opolon, P; Pasinetti, N; Pouzoulet, F; Schupp, C; Vozenin, MC, 2010
)
0.36
" Combination therapy was generally well tolerated with incidences of clinical and laboratory adverse experiences similar between the 2 groups."( Efficacy and safety of adding fenofibrate 160 mg in high-risk patients with mixed hyperlipidemia not controlled by pravastatin 40 mg monotherapy.
Bryniarski, L; Ducobu, J; Farnier, M, 2010
)
0.57
" Adverse event (AE) profiles of FF/PRA 160 mg/40 mg (n=645 in the double-blind cohort) were evaluated relative to comparators (statins, n=519 or fenofibrate, n=122)."( Safety of a fixed-dose combination of fenofibrate/pravastatin 160 mg/40 mg in patients with mixed hyperlipidaemia: a pooled analysis from a database of clinical trials.
Bryniarski, L; Császár, A; De Niet, S; Ducobu, J; Farnier, M; Marcereuil, D; Retterstøl, K; Steinmetz, A; Vanderbist, F, 2012
)
0.63
" These adverse events (AEs) can have serious impact, and form a significant barrier to therapy adherence."( A survey of the FDA's AERS database regarding muscle and tendon adverse events linked to the statin drug class.
Dimbil, M; Golomb, BA; Hoffman, KB; Kraus, C, 2012
)
0.38
" However, this combination is often associated with adverse eff ects, especially muscular and hepatic."( [Combination of pravastatin and fenofibrate (Pravafenix ®). Safety studies].
Hernández Mijares, A, 2014
)
0.75
" We studied whether concurrent use of clarithromycin and a statin not metabolized by CYP3A4 was associated with an increased frequency of serious adverse events."( Risk of adverse events among older adults following co-prescription of clarithromycin and statins not metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4.
Bailey, DG; Dixon, S; Fleet, JL; Gandhi, S; Garg, AX; Gomes, T; Juurlink, D; Kim, R; Li, DQ; Mamdani, M; McArthur, E; Shariff, SZ, 2015
)
0.42
"Among older adults taking a statin not metabolized by CYP3A4, co-prescription of clarithromycin versus azithromycin was associated with a modest but statistically significant increase in the 30-day absolute risk of adverse outcomes."( Risk of adverse events among older adults following co-prescription of clarithromycin and statins not metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4.
Bailey, DG; Dixon, S; Fleet, JL; Gandhi, S; Garg, AX; Gomes, T; Juurlink, D; Kim, R; Li, DQ; Mamdani, M; McArthur, E; Shariff, SZ, 2015
)
0.42
" There were no differences between the 2 groups in rates of study drug side effects, congenital anomalies, or other adverse or serious adverse events."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of pravastatin used for the prevention of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Ahmed, MS; Brown, LM; Caritis, SN; Cleary, K; Costantine, MM; D'Alton, M; Easterling, TR; Haas, DM; Haneline, LS; Hankins, G; Hebert, MF; Ren, Z; Venkataramanan, R; West, H, 2016
)
0.72
"Many adverse drug reactions are caused by the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-dependent activation of drugs into reactive metabolites."( Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
Jones, LH; Nadanaciva, S; Rana, P; Will, Y, 2016
)
0.43
" Safety outcomes were evaluated by the risk of adverse events (AE)."( Efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with statins for coronary heart disease: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Bai, Y; Chan, C; Chang, X; Cheng, N; Cheng, Z; Lu, Y; Zhao, Y, 2016
)
0.43
" Statins are generally well tolerated, but adverse reactions may occur, particularly myopathy and new onset of diabetes."( Diabetogenic effect of pravastatin is associated with insulin resistance and myotoxicity in hypercholesterolemic mice.
Favero, BC; García-Arevalo, M; Gomes-Marcondes, MCC; Lorza-Gil, E; Oliveira, HCF, 2019
)
0.82
" Myotoxicity of statins in certain individuals is often a severe side effect leading to withdrawal."( Resveratrol for protection against statin toxicity in C2C12 and H9c2 cells.
Attalah Nee Rezkallah, C; Chen, QM; Thongkum, A; Zhu, C, 2020
)
0.56
" There were no clinically important differences in statin-related adverse events between groups."( Efficacy and safety profile of statins in patients with cancer: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Alexandre, L; Loke, YK; Thomas, JP, 2020
)
0.56
" Subjects diagnosed with any type of dyslipidemia (population 4804) and received pitavastatin (interventions) versus comparator (comparison) with the primary efficacy endpoint of minimization of LDL-C and non- HDL-C, had an increase in HDL-C and/or reduction in major adverse cardiac events (MACE, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (fatal/nonfatal), and stroke (fatal/nonfatal) and/or their composite (outcomes)."( A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials on the Efficacy and Safety of Pitavastatin.
Alkaabi, M; Amoodi, AA; Baraka, MA; Don, J; Elnour, AA; Farah, FH; Mazrouei, NA; Ramadan, A; Sadeq, A; Sam, KG, 2023
)
0.91

Pharmacokinetics

The authors assessed the mutual influence of the immunosuppressant everolimus (Certican) and the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors atorvastatin and pravastatin when coadministered. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of pravstatin in children is similar to that reported for adults.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The area under the serum concentration-time curve and maximum serum concentration of pravastatin showed dose-proportionality; time to maximum serum concentration and serum elimination half-life were independent of dose."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pravastatin alone and with cholestyramine in hypercholesterolemia.
Brescia, D; DeVault, AR; Ivashkiv, E; Pan, HY; Swites, BJ; Whigan, D; Willard, DA, 1990
)
0.77
"The maximum plasma pravastatin concentration (Cmax), time required for that concentration to develop (Tmax), and the elimination half-life (beta t1/2)."( Pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in elderly versus young men and women.
Funke, PT; Pan, HY; Waclawski, AP; Whigan, D, 1993
)
0.94
"The pharmacokinetic profiles of pravastatin and SQ 31,906 in young and elderly subjects of men and women differed little."( Pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in elderly versus young men and women.
Funke, PT; Pan, HY; Waclawski, AP; Whigan, D, 1993
)
0.89
" There are no simple methods to investigate the concentration-dependent inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase in human pharmacodynamic studies."( Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Similarities and differences.
Fager, G; Lennernäs, H, 1997
)
0.3
" The pharmacokinetic parameters of pravastatin and SQ 31,906 were similar to those of healthy volunteers."( The pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in patients on chronic hemodialysis.
Ford, NF; Gehr, TW; Hammett, JL; Raymond, R; Sica, DA; Slugg, PH, 1997
)
0.88
" Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were determined after 8 hours of serum sampling on the final day of therapy."( Effects of extensive and poor gastrointestinal metabolism on the pharmacodynamics of pravastatin.
Ito, MK, 1998
)
0.52
" Cmax was 48."( A pharmacokinetic evaluation of pravastatin in middle-aged and elderly volunteers.
Jóhannsson, M; Kjartansdóttir, T; Kristinsson, J; Sigurbjörnsson, S; Sigurdsson, G,
)
0.41
" The inhibitory activity of pravastatin against cholesterol synthesis in liver could be related to the concentration in the shallow compartment via a sigmoidal Emax model and the obtained pharmacodynamic parameters were comparable to those in vitro."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation for tissue-selective inhibition of cholesterol synthesis by pravastatin.
Hatanaka, T; Honda, S; Katayama, K; Koizumi, T; Sasaki, S, 1998
)
0.81
" time curve (AUC0-infinity) and Cmax in the absence of mibefradil on day 1 (170 [117 to 395] ng h/mL and 91 [72 to 200] ng/mL respectively, geometric mean [95% confidence intervals]) were not significantly altered in the presence of mibefradil on day 8 (224 [174 to 381] ng h/mL and 124 [72 to 200] ng/mL) and on day 16 (200 [137 to 555] ng h/mL and 91 [74 to 184] ng/mL)."( Mibefradil, a potent CYP3A inhibitor, does not alter pravastatin pharmacokinetics.
Becquemont, L; Funck-Brentano, C; Jaillon, P, 1999
)
0.55
"This study was conducted to evaluate the potential pharmacokinetic interaction between fenofibrate and pravastatin."( Lack of a clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction between fenofibrate and pravastatin in healthy volunteers.
Achari, R; Gustavson, LE; Gutterman, C; Pan, WJ; Rieser, MJ; Wallin, BA; Ye, X, 2000
)
0.75
" Pharmacokinetic parameters [AUC(0-infinity), AUC(0-tn), peak concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (tmax), and half-life (t1/2)] were determined for parent statins and major metabolites."( Itraconazole alters the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin to a greater extent than either cerivastatin or pravastatin.
Agarwal, V; Lasseter, KC; Lettieri, J; Mazzu, AL; Shamblen, EC; Sundaresen, P, 2000
)
0.52
" However, itraconazole dramatically increased atorvastatin AUC (150%), Cmax (38%), and t1/2 (30%) (P < ."( Itraconazole alters the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin to a greater extent than either cerivastatin or pravastatin.
Agarwal, V; Lasseter, KC; Lettieri, J; Mazzu, AL; Shamblen, EC; Sundaresen, P, 2000
)
0.52
"Pravastatin, one of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) widely used in the management of hypercholesterolaemia, has unique pharmacokinetic characteristics among the members of this class."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of pravastatin: mechanisms of pharmacokinetic events.
Hatanaka, T, 2000
)
2.04
" Unusual pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained, including high binding percentage with plasma protein (> 99%), a short elimination half-life (< 4 hr) and a relatively large Vd-area (0."( Possible active transport mechanism in pharmacokinetics of flunixin-meglumin in rabbits.
Horii, Y; Ikenaga, N; Kokue, E; Miyazaki, Y; Shimoda, M, 2001
)
0.31
"The authors assessed the mutual influence of the immunosuppressant everolimus (Certican) and the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors atorvastatin and pravastatin when coadministered based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measures."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors when coadministered with everolimus.
Berthier, S; Hartmann, S; Hubert, M; Kovarik, JM; Rordorf, C; Rosenkranz, B; Schneider, W, 2002
)
0.52
"Fifty-six subjects completed both pharmacokinetic study days."( Pharmacokinetic interactions between protease inhibitors and statins in HIV seronegative volunteers: ACTG Study A5047.
Aberg, JA; Alston, B; Aweeka, F; Blaschke, T; Fang, F; Fichtenbaum, CJ; Gerber, JG; Kosel, B; Rosenkranz, SL; Segal, Y, 2002
)
0.31
"Aim of our study was to obtain pharmacokinetic data on pravastatin whilst monitoring the safety and efficiency of the lipid lowering therapy in heart-transplant recipients under immunosuppression with CsA and to compare these data to those of a healthy control group."( Pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in heart-transplant patients taking cyclosporin A.
Gross, W; Harder, S; Krell, B; März, W; Merz, M; Park, JW; Schüler, S; Seidel, D; Siekmeier, R, 2002
)
0.89
" Blood was sampled for pharmacokinetic profiling (maximum concentration of the drug (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (tmax), area under the concentration vs."( Pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in heart-transplant patients taking cyclosporin A.
Gross, W; Harder, S; Krell, B; März, W; Merz, M; Park, JW; Schüler, S; Seidel, D; Siekmeier, R, 2002
)
0.64
" Mean values for Cmax of pravastatin were 384."( Pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in heart-transplant patients taking cyclosporin A.
Gross, W; Harder, S; Krell, B; März, W; Merz, M; Park, JW; Schüler, S; Seidel, D; Siekmeier, R, 2002
)
0.94
" The pharmacokinetic data obtained indicate that there is no significant cumulation of the drug following multiple dosages in spite of increased drug concentrations after a single oral dosage."( Pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in heart-transplant patients taking cyclosporin A.
Gross, W; Harder, S; Krell, B; März, W; Merz, M; Park, JW; Schüler, S; Seidel, D; Siekmeier, R, 2002
)
0.64
"05), but there was no difference in the half-life between the phases."( Gemfibrozil increases plasma pravastatin concentrations and reduces pravastatin renal clearance.
Backman, JT; Kyrklund, C; Neuvonen, M; Neuvonen, PJ, 2003
)
0.61
"The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of pravastatin in children is similar to that reported for adults."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pravastatin in children with familial hypercholesterolemia.
Antikainen, M; Hedman, M; Neuvonen, M; Neuvonen, PJ, 2003
)
0.84
"The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether there were individual pharmacokinetic differences of a drug, pravastatin."( Individual difference in the pharmacokinetics of a drug, pravastatin, in healthy subjects.
Hasegawa, S; Iwai, S; Nara, K; Ogawa, K; Oguchi, K; Udaka, Y, 2003
)
0.77
" Rifampicin had no significant effect on the peak concentration, elimination half-life or renal clearance of pravastatin."( Effect of rifampicin on pravastatin pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects.
Backman, JT; Kyrklund, C; Neuvonen, M; Neuvonen, PJ, 2004
)
0.84
" No significant changes were detected in any pravastatin pharmacokinetic parameter examined when pravastatin was taken with GFJ."( Effects of grapefruit juice on pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin and pravastatin in Japanese.
Fukazawa, I; Uchida, E; Uchida, N; Yasuhara, H, 2004
)
0.82
" Studies compared the multiple-dose pharmacokinetic interaction profiles of pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin when coadministered with 4 inhibitors of cytochrome P450-3A4 isoenzymes in healthy subjects."( Comparative pharmacokinetic interaction profiles of pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin when coadministered with cytochrome P450 inhibitors.
Jacobson, TA, 2004
)
0.8
"Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) are one of the most widely prescribed classes of drugs throughout the world, because of their excellent cholesterol-lowering effect and overall safety profile except for rare but fatal rhabdomyolysis arising either directly or indirectly by pharmacokinetic interactions with certain other drugs."( A literature search on pharmacokinetic drug interactions of statins and analysis of how such interactions are reflected in package inserts in Japan.
Hasegawa, R; Hirata-Koizumi, M; Miyake, S; Saito, M; Urano, T, 2005
)
0.33
"A MEDLINE search from 1996 to June 2004 was carried out to identify studies on clinical pharmacokinetic drug interactions for the five statins."( A literature search on pharmacokinetic drug interactions of statins and analysis of how such interactions are reflected in package inserts in Japan.
Hasegawa, R; Hirata-Koizumi, M; Miyake, S; Saito, M; Urano, T, 2005
)
0.33
"All pharmacokinetic drug interactions including relevant quantitative data for potential effectors and details on mechanisms of interaction need to be given in package inserts as soon as the information becomes available, to ensure safe and proper use of the drugs concerned."( A literature search on pharmacokinetic drug interactions of statins and analysis of how such interactions are reflected in package inserts in Japan.
Hasegawa, R; Hirata-Koizumi, M; Miyake, S; Saito, M; Urano, T, 2005
)
0.33
"Data from 14 subjects with complete pharmacokinetic samples were available for analysis."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between nelfinavir and pravastatin in HIV-seronegative volunteers: ACTG Study A5108.
Aberg, JA; Alston, BL; Brobst, SW; Fichtenbaum, CJ; Gerber, JG; Rosenkranz, SL; Segal, Y, 2006
)
0.59
"012) and the mean peak concentration in plasma was 231% higher (174."( Impact of the SLCO1B1 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics and lipid-lowering efficacy of multiple-dose pravastatin.
Arnold, KA; Eichelbaum, M; Hofmann, U; Igel, M; Kivistö, KT; Lütjohann, D; Niemi, M; Schwab, M; von Bergmann, K, 2006
)
0.55
"7 years and receiving triple immunosuppressive medication) who had participated in previous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies with pravastatin were genotyped for the -11187G > A and 521T > C SNPs in the SLCO1B1 gene and for the 2677G > T/A and 3435C > T SNPs in the ABCB1 gene."( Pharmacokinetics and response to pravastatin in paediatric patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia and in paediatric cardiac transplant recipients in relation to polymorphisms of the SLCO1B1 and ABCB1 genes.
Antikainen, M; Eichelbaum, M; Hedman, M; Holmberg, C; Kivistö, KT; Neuvonen, M; Neuvonen, PJ; Niemi, M, 2006
)
0.82
" The cardiac transplant recipients with the SLCO1B1 521TC genotype (n = 3) had a 46% lower Cmax (-67."( Pharmacokinetics and response to pravastatin in paediatric patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia and in paediatric cardiac transplant recipients in relation to polymorphisms of the SLCO1B1 and ABCB1 genes.
Antikainen, M; Eichelbaum, M; Hedman, M; Holmberg, C; Kivistö, KT; Neuvonen, M; Neuvonen, PJ; Niemi, M, 2006
)
0.62
"521CC genotype, the mean peak concentration in plasma and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity of pravastatin were 274% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92%-456%; P = ."( SLCO1B1 polymorphism and sex affect the pharmacokinetics of pravastatin but not fluvastatin.
Neuvonen, PJ; Niemi, M; Pasanen, MK, 2006
)
0.78
" Each study participant had ingested a single 40-mg dose of pravastatin followed by blood sampling for pharmacokinetic characterization in standardized conditions."( Association of genetic polymorphism in ABCC2 with hepatic multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 expression and pravastatin pharmacokinetics.
Arnold, KA; Backman, JT; Eichelbaum, M; Gödtel-Armbrust, U; Kivistö, KT; Lang, T; Neuvonen, PJ; Niemi, M; Pasanen, MK; Wojnowski, L; Zanger, UM, 2006
)
0.79
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
"The impact of SLCO1B1 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of olmesartan and on the pharmacokinetic interaction between pravastatin and olmesartan was investigated."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between pravastatin and olmesartan in relation to SLCO1B1 polymorphism.
Higuchi, S; Hirota, T; Ieiri, I; Irie, S; Kawabata, K; Kimura, M; Kusuhara, H; Sugiyama, Y; Suwannakul, S, 2008
)
0.83
" The present study examined the effects of changes in the transporter activities on the systemic and liver exposure of pravastatin using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model."( Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to predict transporter-mediated clearance and distribution of pravastatin in humans.
Kusuhara, H; Maeda, K; Shitara, Y; Sugiyama, Y; Watanabe, T, 2009
)
0.77
"Intra- and inter-ethnic differences in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of clinically relevant drugs are important issues not only for scenes of appropriate drug use in clinical settings but also for those of the drug development."( [Pharmacogenomics: inter-ethnic and intra-ethnic differences in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of clinically relevant drugs].
Higuchi, S; Ieiri, I, 2009
)
0.35
" The mean pharmacokinetic parameters for pravastatin that changed significantly were as follows (rifampicin and placebo groups, respectively): C(max) (315."( Effects of a concomitant single oral dose of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in a two-phase, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy Chinese male subjects.
Cao, D; Chen, XP; Dai, ZY; Deng, S; Li, YJ; Luo, J; Tang, L; Yin, T, 2009
)
0.84
"The aims of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model for pravastatin pharmacokinetics with regard to enterohepatic circulation (EHC) and to evaluate effects of polymorphisms in SLCO1B1 and ABCC2 on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of pravastatin quantitatively."( Quantitative population pharmacokinetic analysis of pravastatin using an enterohepatic circulation model combined with pharmacogenomic Information on SLCO1B1 and ABCC2 polymorphisms.
Higuchi, S; Ide, T; Ieiri, I; Maeda, K; Sasaki, T; Sugiyama, Y, 2009
)
0.83
" We demonstrate the feasibility of our approach with the development of a system that synthesizes pharmacokinetic pathways."( Synthesis of pharmacokinetic pathways through knowledge acquisition and automated reasoning.
Anwar, S; Baral, C; Hakenberg, J; Liang, S; Tari, L, 2010
)
0.36
" Clearance and drug-drug interaction (DDI) of candidate drugs in animal and human could be predicted based on the pharmacokinetic data obtained from in vitro and in vivo experiments."( [Prediction of the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction of pravastatin and pitavastatin with cyclosporine by a digital liver model based on metabolism and transporter].
Lin, ZQ; Yang, J; Yin, XF, 2011
)
0.61
" Tissue-specific mRNA expression is used as a surrogate for protein abundance and activity and is integrated into physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models that already represent detailed anatomical and physiological information."( Using expression data for quantification of active processes in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.
Kuepfer, L; Lippert, J; Ludewig, B; Meyer, M; Schneckener, S, 2012
)
0.38
"Although organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)-mediated hepatic uptake is generally conserved between rodents and humans at a gross pharmacokinetic level, the presence of three major hepatic OATPs with broad overlap in substrate and inhibitor affinity, and absence of rodent-human orthologs preclude clinical translation of single-gene knockout/knockin findings."( Utility of Oatp1a/1b-knockout and OATP1B1/3-humanized mice in the study of OATP-mediated pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution: case studies with pravastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, and carboxydichlorofluorescein.
Bao, JQ; Fallon, JK; Higgins, JW; Ke, AB; Manro, JR; Smith, PC; Zamek-Gliszczynski, MJ, 2014
)
0.6
"The study aims to establish a method for simultaneous determination of repaglinide and pravastatin sodium in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS and to study its pharmacokinetic interactions."( [Simultaneous determination of repaglinide and pravastatin sodium in rat plasma by LC-ms/MS and its application on pharmacokinetic interactions study].
Huang, J; Ma, YR; Rao, Z; Wei, YH; Wu, XA; Zhang, GQ; Zhou, Y, 2014
)
0.88
"In pharmacokinetic evaluation of mice, using serial sampling methods rather than a terminal blood sampling method could reduce the number of animals needed and lead to more reliable data by excluding individual differences."( Using improved serial blood sampling method of mice to study pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interaction.
Nezasa, K; Ogawa, K; Shimizu, R; Takai, N; Tanaka, Y; Watanabe, A; Watari, R; Yamaguchi, Y, 2015
)
0.42
" PVS has a short elimination half-life (1-3 h), suffers from instability at gastric pH, extensive hepatic first-pass metabolism and low absolute bioavailability (18%)."( Duodenum-triggered delivery of pravastatin sodium via enteric surface-coated nanovesicular spanlastic dispersions: development, characterization and pharmacokinetic assessments.
Abd-Elsalam, WH; El-Nabarawi, MA; Tadros, MI; Tayel, SA, 2015
)
0.7
"Volume of distribution is one of the most important pharmacokinetic properties of a drug candidate."( Volume of Distribution in Drug Design.
Beaumont, K; Di, L; Maurer, TS; Smith, DA, 2015
)
0.42
"As an initial step in evaluating the utility of pravastatin in preventing preeclampsia and after consultation with the US Food and Drug Administration, we undertook a pilot randomized controlled trial with the objective to determine pravastatin safety and pharmacokinetic parameters when used in pregnant women at high risk of preeclampsia."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of pravastatin used for the prevention of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Ahmed, MS; Brown, LM; Caritis, SN; Cleary, K; Costantine, MM; D'Alton, M; Easterling, TR; Haas, DM; Haneline, LS; Hankins, G; Hebert, MF; Ren, Z; Venkataramanan, R; West, H, 2016
)
0.98
" Primary outcomes were maternal-fetal safety and pharmacokinetic parameters of pravastatin during pregnancy."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of pravastatin used for the prevention of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Ahmed, MS; Brown, LM; Caritis, SN; Cleary, K; Costantine, MM; D'Alton, M; Easterling, TR; Haas, DM; Haneline, LS; Hankins, G; Hebert, MF; Ren, Z; Venkataramanan, R; West, H, 2016
)
0.95
"This study provides preliminary safety and pharmacokinetic data regarding the use of pravastatin for preventing preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of pravastatin used for the prevention of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Ahmed, MS; Brown, LM; Caritis, SN; Cleary, K; Costantine, MM; D'Alton, M; Easterling, TR; Haas, DM; Haneline, LS; Hankins, G; Hebert, MF; Ren, Z; Venkataramanan, R; West, H, 2016
)
0.94
" The method was successfully applied to the investigation of pharmacokinetic properties of pravastatin and its metabolites in children after an oral dose of 20-40mg."( Quantification of pravastatin acid, lactone and isomers in human plasma by UHPLC-MS/MS and its application to a pediatric pharmacokinetic study.
Gibson, KT; Leeder, JS; van Haandel, L; Wagner, JB, 2016
)
0.99
"Pravastatin sodium (PVS) is a freely water-soluble HMG-CoA inhibitor that suffers from instability at gastric pH, extensive first pass metabolism, short elimination half-life (1-3 h) and low oral bioavailability (18%)."( Duodenum-triggered delivery of pravastatin sodium: II. Design, appraisal and pharmacokinetic assessments of enteric surface-decorated nanocubosomal dispersions.
Abd-Elsalam, WH; El-Nabarawi, MA; Tadros, MI; Tayel, SA, 2016
)
2.16
" A new model was developed for the prediction of AUC of statins that utilized the slopes of the above 2 models, with pharmacokinetic (Cmax) and a pharmacodynamic (IC50 value) components for the statins."( Dual Incorporation of the in vitro Data (IC50) and in vivo (Cmax) Data for the Prediction of Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Statins using Regression Models Developed for Either Pravastatin or Simvastatin.
Srinivas, NR, 2016
)
0.63
" As a validation, we perform mechanistic pharmacokinetic modeling for SLCO1B1 (encoding OATP1B1) and ABCG2 (encoding BCRP) genotyped pharmacokinetic data from 18 clinical studies with healthy Caucasian and/or Asian subjects."( Explaining Ethnic Variability of Transporter Substrate Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Asian and Caucasian Subjects with Allele Frequencies of OATP1B1 and BCRP: A Mechanistic Modeling Analysis.
Barton, HA; Li, R, 2018
)
0.48
"Simulations based on the current hypothesis reasonably describe SLCO1B1 and ABCG2 genotyped pharmacokinetic time course data for five transporter substrates (atorvastatin, pitavastatin, pravastatin, repaglinide, and rosuvastatin) in Caucasian and Asian populations."( Explaining Ethnic Variability of Transporter Substrate Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Asian and Caucasian Subjects with Allele Frequencies of OATP1B1 and BCRP: A Mechanistic Modeling Analysis.
Barton, HA; Li, R, 2018
)
0.67
" Values for total clearance of compounds from plasma should be one of the most important pharmacokinetic parameters for predictions."( Predicted values for human total clearance of a variety of typical compounds with differently humanized-liver mouse plasma data.
Ito, S; Iwamoto, K; Kamimura, H; Mizunaga, M; Nakayama, K; Negoro, T; Nishiwaki, M; Nomura, Y; Suemizu, H; Yamazaki, H; Yoneda, N, 2020
)
0.56
"Accurately predicting the pharmacokinetics of compounds that are transporter substrates has been notoriously challenging using traditional in vitro systems and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling."( Improving the Translation of Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide Substrates using HEK293 Cell Data in the Presence and Absence of Human Plasma via Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.
Bowman, CM; Chen, B; Chen, Y; Cheong, J; Liu, L; Mao, J, 2021
)
0.62
" Serial pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected, and safety was assessed."( Assessment of the Effect of Filgotinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Atorvastatin, Pravastatin, and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Adult Participants.
Alani, M; Anderson, K; Gong, Q; Nelson, CH; Othman, AA; Tarnowski, T, 2022
)
0.95
" We developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to assess drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential between dasatinib and known substrates for these transporters in a virtual population."( Prediction of drug-drug interaction potential mediated by transporters between dasatinib and metformin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.
Bathena, S; Chang, M; Christopher, LJ; Roy, A; Shen, H, 2022
)
0.94

Compound-Compound Interactions

The effects of the two HMG CoA reductase inhibitors lovastatin and pravastatin in combination with 12-16 g cholestyramine on serum lipids were studied in 18 patients with severe primary hypercholesterolemia.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Pravastatin sodium (pravastatin), a tissue-selective inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, was administered alone (50 mg/kg) or in combination with cholestyramine, a bile acid sequestrant resin, at the level of 2% in the diet to homozygous Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic (WHHL) rabbits for 4 weeks."( Effects of pravastatin sodium alone and in combination with cholestyramine on hepatic, intestinal and adrenal low density lipoprotein receptors in homozygous Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits.
Fukami, M; Fukushige, J; Itakura, H; Ito, T; Kuroda, M; Matsumoto, A; Nara, F; Shiomi, M; Tsujita, Y; Watanabe, Y, 1992
)
2.12
" The treated rabbits were given pravastatin sodium (50 mg/kg/day), an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, in combination with cholestyramine (2% in diet), a bile acid sequestrant, for 36 weeks."( Suppression of established atherosclerosis and xanthomas in mature WHHL rabbits by keeping their serum cholesterol levels extremely low. Effect of pravastatin sodium in combination with cholestyramine.
Arai, M; Fukami, M; Fukushige, J; Ito, T; Kuroda, M; Shiomi, M; Tamura, A; Tsujita, Y; Watanabe, Y, 1990
)
0.76
"The effects of the two HMG CoA reductase inhibitors lovastatin and pravastatin in combination with 12-16 g cholestyramine on serum lipids were studied in 18 patients with severe primary hypercholesterolemia."( Long-term treatment (2 years) with the HMG CoA reductase inhibitors lovastatin or pravastatin in combination with cholestyramine in patients with severe primary hypercholesterolemia.
Jacob, BG; Richter, WO; Schwandt, P, 1993
)
0.75
"This randomized, open-label study compared the cost efficiency of low-dose pravastatin combined with low-dose cholestyramine with high-dose pravastatin monotherapy in 59 patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia and coronary disease."( Pravastatin alone and in combination with low-dose cholestyramine in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and coronary artery disease.
Ito, MK; Shabetai, R, 1997
)
1.97
" Pravastatin combined with HRT was therefore suggested to lower serum lipid concentrations earlier than pravastatin alone."( Effect of a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor combined with hormone replacement therapy on lipid metabolism in Japanese women with hypoestrogenic lipidemia: a multicenter double-blind controlled prospective study.
Fuyuki, T; Horiguchi, F; Komukai, S; Makita, K; Nozawa, S; Ohta, H; Sugimoto, I; Takamatsu, K, 1998
)
1.21
"To elucidate the effect on blood pressure and blood lipids of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (captopril), and a beta-receptor blocking agent (atenolol), given alone or in combination with a cholesterol reducing drug, the beta-hydroxy-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor pravastatin, in patients who were also encouraged to improve their lifestyle."( Treatment of hypertensive and hypercholesterolaemic patients in general practice. The effect of captopril, atenolol and pravastatin combined with life style intervention.
Foss, OP; Graff-Iversen, S; Graving, B; Istad, H; Søyland, E; Tjeldflaat, L, 1999
)
0.69
" II: Continued lifestyle intervention combined with captopril or atenolol."( Treatment of hypertensive and hypercholesterolaemic patients in general practice. The effect of captopril, atenolol and pravastatin combined with life style intervention.
Foss, OP; Graff-Iversen, S; Graving, B; Istad, H; Søyland, E; Tjeldflaat, L, 1999
)
0.51
"Pravastatin can be used in combination with captopril or atenolol in the treatment of hypertensive and hypercholesterolaemic patients."( Treatment of hypertensive and hypercholesterolaemic patients in general practice. The effect of captopril, atenolol and pravastatin combined with life style intervention.
Foss, OP; Graff-Iversen, S; Graving, B; Istad, H; Søyland, E; Tjeldflaat, L, 1999
)
1.95
"The objectives of this review are to discuss the role of cytochrome P450 (CYP450) isoforms in drug metabolism, to explain differences in metabolism among the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (HMGs, statins), to review drug-drug and drug-food interaction studies dealing with the HMGs, to present case reports dealing with HMG-related myopathy, to discuss major clinical implications of these case reports and to express an opinion of use of HMGs in clinical practice."( The role of cytochrome P450-mediated drug-drug interactions in determining the safety of statins.
Bottorff, M; Worz, CR, 2001
)
0.31
" Therefore, we determined the effect of SCH 48461 and ezetimibe in combination with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors in chow-fed dogs."( The synergistic hypocholesterolemic activity of the potent cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe, in combination with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibitors in dogs.
Alton, KB; Burrier, RE; Davis, HR; Pula, KK; Watkins, RW, 2001
)
0.31
"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe 10 mg administered with pravastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia."( Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe coadministered with pravastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.
Hassman, D; LeBeaut, A; Lipetz, R; Lipka, L; Melani, L; Mills, R; Mukhopadhyay, P; Suresh, R; Veltri, E, 2003
)
0.8
" Since DDIs are associated with adverse reactions, we performed a cross-sectional study to assess the prevalence of potentially critical drug-drug and drug-statin interactions in an outpatient adult population with dyslipidaemia."( Prevalence of potentially severe drug-drug interactions in ambulatory patients with dyslipidaemia receiving HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy.
Hess, L; Krähenbühl, S; Krähenbühl-Melcher, A; Rätz Bravo, AE; Schlienger, RG; Tchambaz, L, 2005
)
0.33
" This study examined the use of the CETP inhibitor JTT-705 combined with pravastatin."( Effectiveness of inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein by JTT-705 in combination with pravastatin in type II dyslipidemia.
de Grooth, GJ; Kastelein, JJ; Kawamura, H; Klerkx, AH; Kuivenhoven, JA; Trip, MD; Wilhelm, F, 2005
)
0.78
"Hepatic uptake carriers of the organic anion-transporting peptide (OATP) family of solute carriers are more and more recognized as being involved in hepatic elimination of many drugs and potentially associated drug-drug interactions."( Substrate-dependent drug-drug interactions between gemfibrozil, fluvastatin and other organic anion-transporting peptide (OATP) substrates on OATP1B1, OATP2B1, and OATP1B3.
Brun, ME; Funk, C; Noé, J; Portmann, R, 2007
)
0.34
"To evaluate the therapeutic potential of an apolipoprotein A-1 (apoA-1) mimetic peptide, D-4F, in combination with pravastatin in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA), syngeneic Louvain rats were immunized with type II collagen and randomized to vehicle control, D-4F monotherapy, pravastatin monotherapy, or D-4F + pravastatin combination therapy."( Treatment with an apolipoprotein A-1 mimetic peptide in combination with pravastatin inhibits collagen-induced arthritis.
Banquerigo, ML; Brahn, E; Charles-Schoeman, C; Fogelman, AM; Hama, S; Navab, M; Park, GS; Van Lenten, BJ; Wagner, AC, 2008
)
0.79
"In this study, a sensitive and selective method based on liquid chromatography combined with diode array and tandem mass spectrometry detection (LC-DAD-MS/MS) was developed for the simultaneous quantitative determination of fenofibric acid, pravastatin and its main metabolites in human plasma."( An automated method for the simultaneous determination of pravastatin, 3-hydroxy isomeric metabolite, pravalactone and fenofibric acid in human plasma by sensitive liquid chromatography combined with diode array and tandem mass spectrometry detection.
Cahay, B; Klinkenberg, R; Mertens, B; Streel, B, 2008
)
0.77
" Fifty-two patients received TACE combined with pravastatin (20-40 mg/day) and 131 patients received chemoembolization alone."( Chemoembolization combined with pravastatin improves survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Dogan, S; Goke, B; Graf, H; Helmberger, T; Hoffmann, RT; Jakobs, T; Jüngst, C; Jüngst, D; Reiser, M; Seidel, D; Straub, G; Waggershauser, T; Walli, A; Walter, A, 2008
)
0.89
" The current review focuses distinctly on three aspects: (a) an in-depth coverage on the bioanalytical methods for the quantification of clopidogrel and its inactive carboxylic acid metabolite as well as the active metabolite in pre-clinical and clinical samples; (b) an overview of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic aspects of clopidogrel; and (c) enumerating the key findings from drug-drug interaction studies of clopidogrel with various co-substrates such as lanzoprazole, fluvastatin, atorvastatin, pravastatin, digoxin, ketoconazole, donezepil and theophylline."( Clopidogrel: review of bioanalytical methods, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and update on recent trends in drug-drug interaction studies.
Mullangi, R; Srinivas, NR, 2009
)
0.51
"To evaluate the long-term therapeutic effects of atorvastatin via cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 pathway or a non-CYP 3A4 pathway statin, pravastatin, combined with clopidogrel for the patients undergoing coronary stenting."( [Comparison on long-term effects of atorvastatin or pravastatin combined with clopidogrel for patients undergoing coronary stenting: a randomized controlled trial].
Han, YL; Jing, QM; Li, Y; Wang, DM; Wang, SL; Wang, ZL; Zhang, ZL, 2009
)
0.81
"The 12 month clinical outcomes were similar between patients receiving atorvastatin 20 mg/d or pravastatin 20 mg/d combined with clopidogrel after coronary stenting."( [Comparison on long-term effects of atorvastatin or pravastatin combined with clopidogrel for patients undergoing coronary stenting: a randomized controlled trial].
Han, YL; Jing, QM; Li, Y; Wang, DM; Wang, SL; Wang, ZL; Zhang, ZL, 2009
)
0.82
"To evaluate the potential drug-drug interaction between raltegravir and pravastatin."( Drug-drug interactions between raltegravir and pravastatin in healthy volunteers.
Burger, DM; Colbers, A; da Silva, HG; Hoitsma, A; Schouwenberg, B; van Ewijk-Beneken Kolmer, EW; van Luin, M; Verweij-van Wissen, CP, 2010
)
0.85
" It is in clinical development for the prevention of cardiovascular events and will likely be used in combination with standard of care, including statins."( Coadministration of dalcetrapib with pravastatin, rosuvastatin, or simvastatin: no clinically relevant drug-drug interactions.
Abt, M; Bech, N; Derks, M; Meneses-Lorente, G; Parr, G; Phelan, M; Turnbull, L; White, AM, 2010
)
0.63
" Clearance and drug-drug interaction (DDI) of candidate drugs in animal and human could be predicted based on the pharmacokinetic data obtained from in vitro and in vivo experiments."( [Prediction of the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction of pravastatin and pitavastatin with cyclosporine by a digital liver model based on metabolism and transporter].
Lin, ZQ; Yang, J; Yin, XF, 2011
)
0.61
"The hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) influence the pharmacokinetics of several drug classes and are involved in many clinical drug-drug interactions."( Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
Artursson, P; Haglund, U; Karlgren, M; Kimoto, E; Lai, Y; Norinder, U; Vildhede, A; Wisniewski, JR, 2012
)
0.38
"To develop physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict the pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions (DDI) of pravastatin, using the in vitro transport parameters."( Physiologically based modeling of pravastatin transporter-mediated hepatobiliary disposition and drug-drug interactions.
Bergman, A; Feng, B; Goosen, TC; Lai, Y; Litchfield, J; Varma, MV, 2012
)
0.86
" The organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1 and OATP1B3 isoforms are selectively expressed in the human liver and are known to cause significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs), as observed with an increasing number of drugs."( Model-based approaches to predict drug-drug interactions associated with hepatic uptake transporters: preclinical, clinical and beyond.
Barton, HA; El-Kattan, AF; Goosen, TC; Gosset, JR; Jones, HM; Lai, Y; Lin, J; Varma, MV, 2013
)
0.39
" These findings indicate that only fexofenadine is expected to interact with GFJ on OATP2B1 at therapeutic concentrations, in accordance with the clinical observations."( Substrate- and dose-dependent drug interactions with grapefruit juice caused by multiple binding sites on OATP2B1.
Mori, T; Murata, Y; Nakanishi, T; Shirasaka, Y; Tamai, I, 2014
)
0.4
" A Phase 1 study demonstrated the safety of high dose pravastatin given with idarubicin and cytarabine in patients with AML and also demonstrated an encouraging response rate."( SWOG0919: a Phase 2 study of idarubicin and cytarabine in combination with pravastatin for relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia.
Advani, AS; Appelbaum, FR; Copelan, E; List, AF; McDonough, S; Mulford, DA; Othus, M; Sekeres, MA; Willman, C, 2014
)
0.88
" In addition, using serial sampling methods can be valuable for evaluation of the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of drug candidates."( Using improved serial blood sampling method of mice to study pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interaction.
Nezasa, K; Ogawa, K; Shimizu, R; Takai, N; Tanaka, Y; Watanabe, A; Watari, R; Yamaguchi, Y, 2015
)
0.42
"Quantitative assessment of potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is one of the major focuses in drug development."( Characterization of Long-Lasting Oatp Inhibition by Typical Inhibitor Cyclosporine A and In Vitro-In Vivo Discrepancy in Its Drug Interaction Potential in Rats.
Kato, Y; Kogi, T; Masuo, Y; Nakamichi, N; Taguchi, T, 2016
)
0.43
" The purpose of this study is to elucidate the role of hyperlipidaemia alone or in combination with acidosis/alkalosis in the development and potentiation of statin-induced myotoxicity."( Hyperlipidaemia alone and in combination with acidosis can increase the incidence and severity of statin-induced myotoxicity.
Barrett, DA; Bruce, KD; de Moor, CH; Eckel, RH; Gershkovich, P; Lee, JB; Sungelo, M; Taha, DA; Zgair, A, 2017
)
0.46
" A Phase 2 study of high dose pravastatin given in combination with idarubicin and cytarabine demonstrated an impressive response rate [75% complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi)]."( Report of the relapsed/refractory cohort of SWOG S0919: A phase 2 study of idarubicin and cytarabine in combination with pravastatin for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML).
Advani, AS; Appelbaum, FR; Erba, HP; Li, H; Liedtke, M; List, AF; Medeiros, BC; Michaelis, LC; O'Dwyer, K; Othus, M, 2018
)
0.98
" As the management of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) constitutes a key aspect of the care of PLWH, the magnitude of pharmacokinetic DDIs between cardiovascular and anti-HIV drugs needs to be more thoroughly characterized."( UHPLC-MS/MS assay for simultaneous determination of amlodipine, metoprolol, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, atorvastatin with its active metabolites in human plasma, for population-scale drug-drug interactions studies in people living with HIV.
Alves Saldanha, S; Buclin, T; Cavassini, M; Courlet, P; Csajka, C; Decosterd, LA; Desfontaine, V; Marzolini, C; Spaggiari, D, 2019
)
0.74
" In this study, we evaluated the drug-drug interaction potential of the hepatitis C virus inhibitors elbasvir (EBR) and grazoprevir (GZR) with statins."( Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions of the Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents Elbasvir and Grazoprevir with Pitavastatin, Rosuvastatin, Pravastatin, and Atorvastatin in Healthy Adults.
Butterton, JR; Caro, L; Fandozzi, CM; Feng, HP; Fraser, IP; Guo, Z; Iwamoto, M; Levine, V; Panebianco, D; Prueksaritanont, T; Swearingen, D; Wolford, D; Yeh, WW, 2021
)
0.82
"This study aimed to assess the effect of folic acid combined with pravastatin on atherosclerosis-related indexes in elderly patients with hypertension complicated with lacunar cerebral infarction."( Effect of folic acid combined with pravastatin on arteriosclerosis in elderly hypertensive patients with lacunar infarction.
Bu, X; Li, C; Liu, Y, 2021
)
1.14
" We developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to assess drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential between dasatinib and known substrates for these transporters in a virtual population."( Prediction of drug-drug interaction potential mediated by transporters between dasatinib and metformin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.
Bathena, S; Chang, M; Christopher, LJ; Roy, A; Shen, H, 2022
)
0.94

Bioavailability

The oral bioavailability of two HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, pravastatin and lovastatin, was investigated in this randomized, two-way crossover study. The absolute bioavailability (AB) of nimodipine with pravstatin (1 mg/kg) was 31. Based on the above results, since the original drug has a slower dissolution rate than the generic drugs, it is necessary to be cautious about the degradation of pravaston in the stomach.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Radiolabelled studies demonstrated oral absorption and bioavailability values of 34% and 17%, respectively."( Clinical pharmacology of pravastatin, a selective inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase.
Pan, HY, 1991
)
0.58
" The oral absorption of [14C] activity from pravastatin sodium was about 34% and the oral bioavailability was about 18%, suggesting first-pass metabolism of pravastatin."( Disposition of pravastatin sodium, a tissue-selective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, in healthy subjects.
Morrison, RA; Pan, HY; Singhvi, SM; Willard, DA, 1990
)
0.89
"The oral bioavailability of two HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, pravastatin and lovastatin, was investigated in this randomized, two-way crossover study."( Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pravastatin and lovastatin.
DeVault, AR; Ivashkiv, E; Pan, HY; Sugerman, AA; Swanson, BN; Wang-Iverson, D, 1990
)
0.77
" The results imply a decreased bioavailability of SLS in the statin-treated group, while no evidence for an altered permeability barrier to water was found."( Effect of systemic treatment with cholesterol-lowering drugs on the skin barrier function in humans.
Agner, E; Agner, T; Malinowski, J; Meibom, J; Ramsing, D, 1995
)
0.29
"The bioavailability of pravastatin, a hypocholesterolmic agent, may be enhanced by decreasing its exposure to stomach contents, where it may be converted nonenzymatically to a relatively inactive metabolite."( Gastrointestinal absorption of pravastatin in healthy subjects.
O'Donnell, D; Pan, HY; Triscari, J; Zinny, M, 1995
)
0.89
" An enteric formulation of pravastatin should increase the bioavailability of pravastatin and enhanced lipid-lowering efficacy."( Effects of extensive and poor gastrointestinal metabolism on the pharmacodynamics of pravastatin.
Ito, MK, 1998
)
0.82
"Grapefruit juice greatly increases the bioavailability of lovastatin and simvastatin."( Grapefruit juice increases serum concentrations of atorvastatin and has no effect on pravastatin.
Kivistö, KT; Lilja, JJ; Neuvonen, PJ, 1999
)
0.53
" Compared with lovastatin, the cytochrome P-450-dependent intestinal intrinsic clearance of pravastatin was >5000-fold lower and cannot be expected to significantly affect its oral bioavailability or to be a significant site of drug interactions."( Small intestinal metabolism of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor lovastatin and comparison with pravastatin.
Baner, K; Benet, LZ; Christians, U; Deters, M; Hackbarth, I; Hallensleben, K; Jacobsen, W; Kirchner, G; Mancinelli, L; Sewing, KF, 1999
)
0.73
" Pharmacokinetic parameters of these three compounds were calculated using noncompartmental methods and compared by analyses of variance and bioavailability assessments."( Lack of a clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction between fenofibrate and pravastatin in healthy volunteers.
Achari, R; Gustavson, LE; Gutterman, C; Pan, WJ; Rieser, MJ; Wallin, BA; Ye, X, 2000
)
0.53
" The oral bioavailability of pravastatin is low because of incomplete absorption and a first-pass effect."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of pravastatin: mechanisms of pharmacokinetic events.
Hatanaka, T, 2000
)
0.89
" Lovastatin, Atorvastatin, Pravastatin and Simvastatin demonstrate variable potency to enhance the NO/O2- concentration ratio after stimulation of NOS, resulting in an increase of NO bioavailability in endothelial cells."( Statin-stimulated nitric oxide release from endothelium.
Dobrucki, IT; Dobrucki, LW; Kalinowski, L; Malinski, T,
)
0.43
" As statin treatment is known to increase nitric oxide bioavailability and enhance myocardial function, we tested whether ADMA concentration modifies the effect of pravastatin on myocardial blood flow in young adults with mild hypercholesterolemia."( Plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine modifies the effect of pravastatin on myocardial blood flow in young adults.
Janatuinen, T; Knuuti, J; Laakso, J; Laaksonen, R; Lehtimäki, T; Nuutila, P; Raitakari, OT; Vesalainen, R, 2003
)
0.76
" Dose optimization and use of novel controlled drug delivery systems may help in increasing the bioavailability and distribution of statins to the bone microenvironment."( Statins and osteoporosis: new role for old drugs.
Jadhav, SB; Jain, GK, 2006
)
0.33
" In conclusion, orange juice increases the bioavailability of pravastatin administered orally."( Orange juice increased the bioavailability of pravastatin, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitor, in rats and healthy human subjects.
Kobayashi, S; Koitabashi, Y; Kumai, T; Matsumoto, N; Sekine, S; Watanabe, M; Yanagida, Y, 2006
)
0.83
"An open-label, randomised, crossover single-dose study, using two periods, two sequences, with a minimum washout period of 7 days, was conducted in order to assess the comparative bioavailability of a pravastatin (CAS 81131-70-6) 40 mg formulation and that of a reference formulation."( Comparative study on the bioequivalence of two formulations of pravastatin. Data from a crossover, randomised, open-label bioequivalence study in healthy volunteers.
Almeida, A; Almeida, S; Antonijoan, R; Barbanoj, M; Cruz Caturla, M; Filipe, A; Gich, I; Puntes, M, 2006
)
0.76
" Human oral bioavailability is an important pharmacokinetic property, which is directly related to the amount of drug available in the systemic circulation to exert pharmacological and therapeutic effects."( Hologram QSAR model for the prediction of human oral bioavailability.
Andricopulo, AD; Moda, TL; Montanari, CA, 2007
)
0.34
"Reduction in evoked flow velocity responses reflects reduced nitric oxide bioavailability and therefore supports molecular findings of acute statin withdrawal."( Effects of initiation and acute withdrawal of statins on the neurovascular coupling mechanism in healthy, normocholesterolemic humans.
Auch, D; Kaps, M; Rosengarten, B, 2007
)
0.34
"Various mechanisms can influence the intestinal absorption and oral bioavailability of drugs."( Contribution of multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 to secretory intestinal transport of organic anions.
Chiba, M; Hirano, T; Iseki, K; Itagaki, S; Kobayashi, M, 2008
)
0.35
"Oral bioavailability (F) is a product of fraction absorbed (Fa), fraction escaping gut-wall elimination (Fg), and fraction escaping hepatic elimination (Fh)."( Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
Chang, G; El-Kattan, A; Miller, HR; Obach, RS; Rotter, C; Steyn, SJ; Troutman, MD; Varma, MV, 2010
)
0.36
" Cyclosporin, pravastatin, and azithromycin are known to inhibit P-glycoprotein, which will enhance the intracellular colchicine level by acting in its bioavailability and moderating hepatic and renal excretion."( Colchicine-induced rhabdomyolysis in a heart/lung transplant patient with concurrent use of cyclosporin, pravastatin, and azithromycin.
Bouquié, R; Dailly, E; Deslandes, G; Haloun, A; Jolliet, P; Renaud, C, 2011
)
0.94
" The bioavailability of statin drugs is low due the effects of P-glycoprotein in the gastro-intestinal tract as well as the first-pass metabolism."( Characterization of human erythrocytes as potential carrier for pravastatin: an in vitro study.
Alanazi, FK; Harisa, Gel-D; Ibrahim, MF, 2011
)
0.61
" Maximal superoxide scavenging with polyethylene glycol-superoxide dismutase (PEG-SOD), 150 U/ml did not influence phenylephrine constrictor responses but potentiated pravastatin's effect, suggesting that the statin did not increase NO bioavailability merely via an antioxidant mechanism."( Acute modulation of vasoconstrictor responses by pravastatin in small vessels.
Ball, C; Beltrame, JF; Ghaffari, N; Kennedy, JA; Stafford, I, 2011
)
0.82
"In small vessels, pravastatin inhibits constrictor responses by increasing endothelial NO bioavailability via the Akt pathway."( Acute modulation of vasoconstrictor responses by pravastatin in small vessels.
Ball, C; Beltrame, JF; Ghaffari, N; Kennedy, JA; Stafford, I, 2011
)
0.96
"The purpose of research was to develop a mucoadhesive multiparticulate sustained drug delivery system of pravastatin sodium, a highly water-soluble and poorly bioavailable drug, unstable at gastric pH."( Design and in vitro performance evaluation of purified microparticles of pravastatin sodium for intestinal delivery.
Garg, Y; Pathak, K, 2011
)
0.81
" Bioavailability studies in rabbits demonstrated that [F9 (P3)] significantly higher C(max) (67."( Bilayered transmucosal drug delivery system of pravastatin sodium: statistical optimization, in vitro, ex vivo, in vivo and stability assessment.
Bali, V; Maurya, SK; Pathak, K, 2012
)
0.64
"Mucoadhesive bilayer buccal patch has been developed to improve the bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy along with providing sustained release of pravastatin sodium."( Biopolymeric mucoadhesive bilayer patch of pravastatin sodium for buccal delivery and treatment of patients with atherosclerosis.
Dhiman, MK; Petkar, K; Sawant, K; Yedurkar, P, 2013
)
0.85
" Based on the above results, since the original drug has a slower dissolution rate than the generic drugs, it is necessary to be cautious about the degradation of pravastatin in the stomach and the bioavailability of pravastatin due to the different dissolution rates and the different residual amount of pravastatin in the stomach."( [Equivalence studies of pravastatin original and generic drugs by dissolution test].
Hashimoto, N; Katakawa, J; Nakauchi, T; Nozaki, A; Okamoto, T; Seko, F; Takeuchi, E; Teramoto, K; Yuminoki, K, 2012
)
0.88
"  Ritonavir dramatically increases the bioavailability of a variety of concurrently administered drugs by inhibition of metabolic enzymes and drug transporters."( Analysis of the pharmacokinetic boosting effects of ritonavir on oral bioavailability of drugs in mice.
Banba, H; Takayama, K; Takeda-Morishita, M; Tomaru, A, 2013
)
0.39
" Consequently, the absolute bioavailability (AB) of nimodipine with pravastatin (1 mg/kg) was 31."( Effects of pravastatin on the pharmacokinetic parameters of nimodipine after oral and intravenous administration in rats: possible role of CYP3A4 inhibition by pravastatin.
Choi, DH; Choi, JS; Lee, CK,
)
0.76
"The enhanced oral bioavailability of nimodipine might be mainly due to inhibition of the CYP3A-mediated metabolism of nimodipine in the small intestine and/or in the liver and due to reduction of the total body clearance rather than both to inhibition of the P-gp efflux transporter in the small intestine and reduction of renal elimination of nimodipine by pravastatin."( Effects of pravastatin on the pharmacokinetic parameters of nimodipine after oral and intravenous administration in rats: possible role of CYP3A4 inhibition by pravastatin.
Choi, DH; Choi, JS; Lee, CK,
)
0.69
" Knockin of OATP1B1 or OATP1B3 partially restored control clearance, volume, and bioavailability values (24%-142% increase, ≤47% increase, and ≤77% decrease vs."( Utility of Oatp1a/1b-knockout and OATP1B1/3-humanized mice in the study of OATP-mediated pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution: case studies with pravastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, and carboxydichlorofluorescein.
Bao, JQ; Fallon, JK; Higgins, JW; Ke, AB; Manro, JR; Smith, PC; Zamek-Gliszczynski, MJ, 2014
)
0.6
"OATP2B1-mediated grapefruit juice (GFJ)-drug interactions are substrate-dependent; for example, GFJ ingestion significantly reduces bioavailability of fexofenadine, but not pravastatin."( Substrate- and dose-dependent drug interactions with grapefruit juice caused by multiple binding sites on OATP2B1.
Mori, T; Murata, Y; Nakanishi, T; Shirasaka, Y; Tamai, I, 2014
)
0.6
" PVS has a short elimination half-life (1-3 h), suffers from instability at gastric pH, extensive hepatic first-pass metabolism and low absolute bioavailability (18%)."( Duodenum-triggered delivery of pravastatin sodium via enteric surface-coated nanovesicular spanlastic dispersions: development, characterization and pharmacokinetic assessments.
Abd-Elsalam, WH; El-Nabarawi, MA; Tadros, MI; Tayel, SA, 2015
)
0.7
"Pravastatin sodium (PVS) is a freely water-soluble HMG-CoA inhibitor that suffers from instability at gastric pH, extensive first pass metabolism, short elimination half-life (1-3 h) and low oral bioavailability (18%)."( Duodenum-triggered delivery of pravastatin sodium: II. Design, appraisal and pharmacokinetic assessments of enteric surface-decorated nanocubosomal dispersions.
Abd-Elsalam, WH; El-Nabarawi, MA; Tadros, MI; Tayel, SA, 2016
)
2.16
" Impaired nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability seems to be involved in these pathophysiological changes observed in hypertensive pregnancy."( Placental nitric oxide formation and endothelium-dependent vasodilation underlie pravastatin effects against angiogenic imbalance, hypertension in pregnancy and intrauterine growth restriction.
Chimini, JS; da Silva, MLS; Dias-Junior, CA; Possomato-Vieira, JS, 2019
)
0.74
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51

Dosage Studied

Pravastatin can be safely administered in the usual dosages to subjects with renal failure on hemodialysis and no change in dosing is necessary. Nicotinamide did not show a synergistic effect with pravstatin at the dosage used in this study.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"The chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials, adverse effects, role in lipid-lowering therapy, and dosage and administration of pravastatin are reviewed."( Pravastatin: a new drug for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia.
Cantral, KA; Jungnickel, PW; Maloley, PA, 1992
)
1.93
"This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to evaluate dose-response effects and safety of once-daily administration of pravastatin, a new inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase."( Once-daily pravastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a dose-response study.
Berkson, DM; Colfer, HT; Cressman, MD; Farmer, JA; Farnham, DJ; Jones, PH; McKenney, JM; Proctor, JD; Wolfson, PM; Wright, JT, 1991
)
0.87
"The effects of long-term dosing with inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase on the rate of cholesterol biosynthesis were examined in the lens and liver of rats and hamsters."( Effects of long-term administration of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on cholesterol synthesis in lens.
Kalinowski, SS; Mosley, ST; Tanaka, RD, 1991
)
0.28
"The efficacy of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing of pravastatin was determined in men with primary hypercholesterolemia."( Comparative efficacy of once-daily versus twice-daily pravastatin in primary hypercholesterolemia.
Brescia, D; DeVault, AR; Pan, HY; Willard, DA,
)
0.63
"This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study was conducted in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia to examine the effects of pravastatin, a selective inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, on plasma lipids and lipoproteins."( Efficacy and safety of pravastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. I. A dose-response study.
Brown, WV; Dobs, AS; Goldberg, AC; Hunninghake, DB; Insull, W; Knopp, RH; Margolis, S; Mellies, MJ; Schaefer, EJ; Schonfeld, G, 1990
)
0.79
"Pravastatin sodium was orally administered to cynomolgus monkeys at dosage levels of 50, 200 and 800 mg/kg/day for 7 successive days."( Preliminary dose finding study for subacute toxicological study of pravastatin sodium in monkeys.
Manabe, S; Masuda, H; Matsunuma, N; Miyakoshi, N; Sudo, S; Yamashita, K, 1989
)
1.96
"Pravastatin sodium was administered orally to cynomolgus monkeys at dosage levels of 50, 100, 200 and 400 mg/kg/day for 5 successive weeks."( Subacute toxicological study in monkeys treated orally with pravastatin sodium for 5 weeks.
Manabe, S; Masuda, H; Matsunuma, N; Miyakoshi, N; Sudo, S; Tanase, H; Yamashita, K, 1989
)
1.96
" In rat liver slices, the dose-response curves for inhibition of [14C]acetate incorporation into cholesterol were similar for the active acid forms of lovastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin."( Tissue-selective acute effects of inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase on cholesterol biosynthesis in lens.
Kalinowski, SS; Mosley, ST; Schafer, BL; Tanaka, RD, 1989
)
0.47
" Most of these drugs have side effects which, in the elderly, may necessitate lower dosing than usual."( Treating hyperlipidemia, Part III: Drug therapy.
Brown, WV; Karmally, W; Smith, DA, 1987
)
0.27
" This difference is consistent throughout the dosage range."( Pharmaco-economic assessment of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
Smart, AJ; Walters, L, 1994
)
0.29
"8% higher than an equivalent milligram dose of pravastatin, depending on the dosage used."( Pharmaco-economic assessment of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
Smart, AJ; Walters, L, 1994
)
0.55
" Severe renal insufficiency may necessitate dosage modification in lovastatin recipients."( Interactions with hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors.
Garnett, WR, 1995
)
0.29
" The drug acquisition cost per year of therapy was calculated for each patient's most recent dosage of lovastatin and pravastatin as of April 1993."( Replacing lovastatin with pravastatin: effect on serum lipids and costs.
Borysiuk, L; Korman, L, 1995
)
0.8
" The drugs were administered in dosages of 10 mg/kg from the fourth to seventh weeks; at the end of the seventh week, plasma cholesterol was determined, and the Pravastatin dosage adjusted to 15 mg/kg to obtain similar levels of plasma cholesterol for the two experimental groups."( Effects of simvastatin and pravastatin on endothelium-dependent relaxation in hypercholesterolemic rabbits.
Jorge, PA; Metze, K; Ozaki, MR, 1994
)
0.78
" The smaller effect observed with the more commonly used dosage (10 mg/day) was most probably due to the characteristics of the sample with already established hypercholesterolemia, being thus dependent of higher concentrations of medications, as observed in previous treatments in our outpatient clinic."( [Pravastatin effects on lipoproteins, Lp (a), apo B and apo A-1 in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia].
da Silva, RC; Feres, MC; Fonseca, FA; Lima, JC; Martinez, TL; Novazzi, JP, 1994
)
1.2
"6%) received the standard dosage of 10 mg/day whereas 140 patients (19."( The RED-LIP study--pravastatin in primary isolated hypercholesterolemia--an open, prospective, multicenter trial.
Pirich, C; Sinzinger, H, 1994
)
0.62
" Fourteen subjects were given simvastatin, and 12 were given pravastatin, both at the maximum therapeutic dosage of 40 mg/day."( Sustained therapy with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme-A reductase inhibitors does not impair steroidogenesis by adrenals and gonads.
Faccini, G; Moghetti, P; Muggeo, M; Negri, C; Tosi, F; Travia, D, 1995
)
0.53
" Once daily dosing consisted of 10 mg pravastatin during the first month, 20 mg during the second month and 40 mg during an additional 4 months or matching placebos."( Efficacy and safety of pravastatin in hypertensive hypercholesterolaemic patients on antihypertensive drug therapy.
Amery, A; Celis, H; Fagard, R; Lijnen, P; Staessen, J; Thijs, L, 1994
)
0.87
" The dual route of elimination reduces the need for dosage adjustment if the function of either of these organs is impaired."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of pravastatin.
Jones, PH; Quion, JA, 1994
)
0.58
" Dosage could be doubled after 8 weeks, a bile acid-binding resin could be added after 16 weeks, and nicotinic acid or probucol could be added after 32 weeks, as needed, to adequately lower the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels."( Efficacy and safety of pravastatin in the long-term treatment of elderly patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Behounek, BD; Kobylak, L; Maciejko, JJ; McGovern, ME; Rosman, HS; Rubenfire, M; Santinga, JT, 1994
)
0.6
" To inhibit HMG-CoA reductase in liver, pravastatin sodium, a competitive inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, was administered to homozygous Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic (WHHL) rabbits, a low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient animal model, at a dosage of 50 mg/kg per day for 5 weeks."( Pravastatin sodium, a competitive inhibitor of hepatic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, decreases the cholesterol content of newly secreted very-low-density lipoprotein in Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits.
Ito, T; Shiomi, M, 1994
)
2
" Pravastatin, a well tolerated HMG CoA reductase inhibitor with a convenient once-daily dosing regimen, has been shown to effectively lower total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol."( Pravastatin experience in elderly and non-elderly patients.
DeVault, AR; Kassler-Taub, K; McGovern, ME; Mellies, MJ; Pan, HY, 1993
)
2.64
"The pharmacokinetics of pravastatin do not necessitate dosage adjustments in elderly men or women."( Pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in elderly versus young men and women.
Funke, PT; Pan, HY; Waclawski, AP; Whigan, D, 1993
)
0.92
"Using various concentrations of the drugs, a dose-response curve was constructed for the inhibition of the cholesterol synthesis."( Pravastatin and simvastatin differently inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis in human lens.
Bloemendal, H; Cohen, LH; de Vries, AC; Vermeer, MA, 1993
)
1.73
"A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial in 672 hypercholesterolemic patients evaluated the efficacy and safety profile of lovastatin and pravastatin across their usually recommended dosage ranges (lovastatin 20 to 80 mg/day and pravastatin 10 to 40 mg/day)."( A multicenter comparative trial of lovastatin and pravastatin in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. The Lovastatin Pravastatin Study Group.
, 1993
)
0.74
" Using various concentrations of the drugs, a dose-response curve was composed for the inhibition of the cholesterol synthesis."( Different effects of the hypolipidemic drugs pravastatin and lovastatin on the cholesterol biosynthesis of the human ocular lens in organ culture and on the cholesterol content of the rat lens in vivo.
Cohen, LH; de Vries, AC, 1993
)
0.55
"After 8 weeks of therapy, pravastatin in a dosage of 20 mg twice daily reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 31%, whereas a dosage of 40 mg twice daily reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 38%."( Comparative efficacy and safety of pravastatin and cholestyramine alone and combined in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Pravastatin Multicenter Study Group II.
, 1993
)
0.86
"The efficacy and safety profile of simvastatin and pravastatin across their most commonly recommended dosage ranges were compared in a double-blind, parallel, multicenter study in 550 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia."( Comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of simvastatin and pravastatin for hypercholesterolemia. The Simvastatin Pravastatin Study Group.
, 1993
)
0.77
" In posttransplant patients receiving cyclosporine, safety has been documented for low doses of lovastatin and simvastatin, but when a higher dosage of an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor is warranted, pravastatin should be considered the drug of choice because of a lower incidence of myopathy."( Comparative evaluation of the safety and efficacy of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor monotherapy in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia.
Hsu, I; Johnson, NE; Spinler, SA,
)
0.32
" The dosage consisted of 10 mg of pravastatin daily during the 6-month trial."( The effectiveness and safety of low dose pravastatin in elderly hypertensive hypercholesterolemic subjects on antihypertensive therapy.
Chan, P; Ko, JT; Lee, CB; Lee, YS; Lin, TS; Pan, WH, 1995
)
0.84
" Only 2 of the 90 patients were on maximal dosage regimens."( Inadequate treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors by health care providers.
Feingold, KR; Marcelino, JJ, 1996
)
0.29
" It is likely that the magnitude of risk reduction produced by lipid-lowering therapy is proportional to the degree of cholesterol lowering achieved, which is an important consideration when selecting an agent and deciding the dosage to use."( Benefits and risks of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in the prevention of coronary heart disease: a reappraisal.
Pedersen, TR; Tobert, JA, 1996
)
0.29
"In dogs, no significant difference in the reduction of serum cholesterol was observed among three dosing regimens of pravastatin: once in the morning (3 mg/kg), once in the evening (3 mg/kg), and twice-daily (1."( The mechanism of comparable serum cholesterol lowering effects of pravastatin sodium, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A inhibitor, between once- and twice-daily treatment regimens in beagle dogs and rabbits.
Fujioka, T; Fukami, M; Fukushige, J; Nara, F; Shigehara, E; Shimada, Y; Shimotsu, H; Tsujita, Y, 1996
)
0.74
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the cholesterol-lowering and antiatherosclerotic effect of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor pravastatin sodium at a dosage comparable to human therapy."( Effects of low-dose pravastatin sodium on plasma cholesterol levels and aortic atherosclerosis of heterozygous WHHL rabbits fed a low cholesterol (0.03%) enriched diet for one year.
Braesen, JH; Harsch, M; Niendorf, A, 1997
)
0.83
" Over 2 weeks, patients' regimens were titrated to a maximal dosage of 500 mg tid."( Combination of low-dose niacin and pravastatin improves the lipid profile in diabetic patients without compromising glycemic control.
Fonseca, VA; Gardner, SF; Granberry, MC; Marx, MA; Skelton, DR; White, LM, 1997
)
0.57
" At the dosage used pravastatin significantly lowered the total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol levels and increased the HDL-cholesterol levels compared to placebo."( Time course of serum lipids and apolipoproteins after acute myocardial infarction: modification by pravastatin.
Blanckaert, N; Claeys, G; Kesteloot, H; Lesaffre, E, 1997
)
0.84
" Micronised fenofibrate has improved absorption characteristics compared with the standard preparation, allowing a lower daily dosage and once-daily administration."( Micronised fenofibrate: a review of its pharmacodynamic properties and clinical efficacy in the management of dyslipidaemia.
Adkins, JC; Faulds, D, 1997
)
0.3
" dose was employed, followed by daily oral dosing of 20 mg over four hemodialysis intervals."( The pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in patients on chronic hemodialysis.
Ford, NF; Gehr, TW; Hammett, JL; Raymond, R; Sica, DA; Slugg, PH, 1997
)
0.6
"No statistical differences in the pharmacokinetics of pravastatin or SQ 31,906 were evident when comparing the first and last days of oral dosing with pravastatin."( The pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in patients on chronic hemodialysis.
Ford, NF; Gehr, TW; Hammett, JL; Raymond, R; Sica, DA; Slugg, PH, 1997
)
0.85
"Pravastatin can be safely administered in the usual dosages to subjects with renal failure on hemodialysis and no change in dosing is necessary."( The pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in patients on chronic hemodialysis.
Ford, NF; Gehr, TW; Hammett, JL; Raymond, R; Sica, DA; Slugg, PH, 1997
)
2.05
" Concomitant use of potent inhibitors of CYP3A with simvastatin should be avoided or its dosage should be greatly reduced."( Simvastatin but not pravastatin is very susceptible to interaction with the CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole.
Kantola, T; Kivistö, KT; Neuvonen, PJ, 1998
)
0.62
" Nicotinamide did not show a synergistic effect with pravastatin at the dosage used in this study."( Prevention of primary islet isograft nonfunction in mice with pravastatin.
Arita, S; Atiya, A; Kasraie, A; Mullen, Y; Ohtsuka, S; Shevlin, L; Une, S, 1998
)
0.79
" These two factors suggest that an increase in the dosage of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor may be appropriate."( Compliance with and efficacy of treatment with pravastatin and cholestyramine: a randomized study on lipid-lowering in primary care.
Eriksson, M; Hådell, K; Holme, I; Kjellström, T; Walldius, G, 1998
)
0.56
" In animals receiving pravastatin and the enriched diet (verum group; n = 6), mean total serum cholesterol levels were consistently lowered at a dosage of 5 mg/kg pravastatin and with the combined treatment."( Survival and cardiovascular pathology of heterozygous Watanabe heritable hyperlipidaemic rabbits treated with pravastatin and probucol on a low-cholesterol (0.03%)-enriched diet.
Bräsen, JH; Harsch, M; Niendorf, A, 1998
)
0.83
" The incidence of side effects with these agents increases as the dose increases within the recommended dosage range."( Comparative efficacy and tolerability of low-dose pravastatin versus lovastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Gaziano, JM; Lapsley, D; Strauss, WE, 1999
)
0.56
" In particular, pravastatin at a dosage of 20 mg/ day significantly reduced only fibrinogen levels, while at a dosage of 40 mg/day significantly reduced factor VII, fibrinogen, prothrombin fragments 1 and 2, thrombin-antithrombin complexes, tissue plasminogen activator antigen (tPA:Ag) before venous occlusion (b."( Non lipid, dose-dependent effects of pravastatin treatment on hemostatic system and inflammatory response.
Avellone, G; Bono, M; De Simone, R; Di Garbo, V; Di Raimondo, D; Raneli, G, 2000
)
0.93
"Niacin increased HDL cholesterol levels by 30%, with the majority of effect achieved at a dosage of 500 mg twice daily."( Effective and safe modification of multiple atherosclerotic risk factors in patients with peripheral arterial disease.
Applegate, WB; Crouse, JR; Davis, KB; Egan, D; Elam, MB; Garg, R; Herd, JA; Hunninghake, DB; Johnson, WC; Kennedy, JW; Kostis, JB; Sheps, DS, 2000
)
0.31
" The dual routes of pravastatin elimination reduce the need for dosage adjustment if the function of either the liver or kidney is impaired, and also reduce the possibility of drug interactions compared with other statins."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of pravastatin: mechanisms of pharmacokinetic events.
Hatanaka, T, 2000
)
0.92
" A dosage of 20 mg pravastatin (pravachol) and 1 g of fish oil (prolipid) were added to the diet after dinner, according to our protocol."( Combined treatment with low-dose pravastatin and fish oil in post-renal transplantation dislipidemia.
Bacharaki, D; Bamichas, G; Grekas, D; Kassimatis, E; Makedou, A; Tourkantonis, A, 2001
)
0.92
" The dosage of simvastatin was based on the additional percent reduction in LDL cholesterol needed to achieve the goal specified by the National Cholesterol Education Program."( Effect of pravastatin-to-simvastatin conversion on low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol.
Dresselhaus, TR; Henry, RR; Ito, MK; Lin, JC; Marcus, DB; Morreale, AP; Shabetai, R, 2001
)
0.71
" Dose-response curves of simvastatin for bone formation and resorption differed."( Effect of statins on bone mineral density and bone histomorphometry in rodents.
Conradie, MM; Gopal, R; Hough, S; Hulley, PA; Maritz, FJ, 2001
)
0.31
" Six product brands encompassing 20 dosage strengths have been available during the past two years."( Managed care trends in statin usage.
Bazalo, GR, 2001
)
0.31
" Trends in market share, mean daily dose, and dosage distribution of the six current statin brands were examined."( Managed care trends in statin usage.
Bazalo, GR, 2001
)
0.31
"Fifty-three patients were randomized to group 1, for which the dosing frequency was changed from daily to every other day, and 51 patients were randomized to group 2, for which the daily dose was halved."( Maintenance of low-density lipoprotein goal with step-down pravastatin therapy.
Graham, MR; Kennedy, JA; Lindsey, CC, 2002
)
0.56
" If a clinician decides, however, to attempt dosage reduction, the preferred regimen appears to be to halve the current dose once/day (vs administering the current dose every other day)."( Maintenance of low-density lipoprotein goal with step-down pravastatin therapy.
Graham, MR; Kennedy, JA; Lindsey, CC, 2002
)
0.56
" To evaluate this effect further, dose-response curves with noradrenaline were measured in the presence and absence of 20 micromol/l simvastatin, lovastatin, mevastatin and pravastatin."( Inhibition of smooth muscle cell calcium mobilization and aortic ring contraction by lactone vastatins.
Altieri, PI; Crespo, MJ; Escobales, N; Furilla, RA, 1996
)
0.49
" Oral dosing of pravastatin (0."( Effects of pravastatin on the expression of ATP-binding cassette transporter A1.
Ando, H; Fujimura, A; Kaneko, S; Takamura, T; Tsuruoka, S; Yamamoto, H, 2004
)
1.06
" Instructions for dosage adjustment are seldom provided in the Japanese package inserts."( A literature search on pharmacokinetic drug interactions of statins and analysis of how such interactions are reflected in package inserts in Japan.
Hasegawa, R; Hirata-Koizumi, M; Miyake, S; Saito, M; Urano, T, 2005
)
0.33
"The aim of this study was to test whether oral pre-treatment with rosuvastatin at a dosage giving clinically relevant plasma concentrations protects the myocardium against ischaemia/reperfusion injury and to investigate the involvement of nitric oxide (NO) and neutrophil infiltration."( Oral pre-treatment with rosuvastatin protects porcine myocardium from ischaemia/reperfusion injury via a mechanism related to nitric oxide but not to serum cholesterol level.
Bulhak, AA; Gonon, AT; Gourine, AV; Pernow, J; Sjöquist, PO; Valen, G, 2005
)
0.33
"To investigate the effect of early intervention by pravastatin with two different dosage on inflammatory factors and endothelial vasodilator function in patients with unstable angina (UA)."( [Clinical study of pravastatin with different dosage in early admission period in patients with unstable angina].
Han, ZH; Hu, R; Lü, Q; Ma, CS; Wu, XS; Zhao, Z, 2005
)
0.91
" In the dosage of 20 mg pravastatin group non-endothelium-dependent vasodilation in brachial artery was also tested by ultrasound before and 8 weeks after the therapy."( [Clinical study of pravastatin with different dosage in early admission period in patients with unstable angina].
Han, ZH; Hu, R; Lü, Q; Ma, CS; Wu, XS; Zhao, Z, 2005
)
0.96
" Blood samples were collected for 24 hours after dosing on days 5, 6, and 15."( The effects of multiple doses of fenofibrate on the pharmacokinetics of pravastatin and its 3alpha-hydroxy isomeric metabolite.
Achari, R; Chira, TO; Esslinger, HU; Gustavson, LE; Koehne-Voss, S; Schweitzer, SM; Yannicelli, HD, 2005
)
0.56
" Moreover, it is unclear if the cardiovascular disease history length was similar in the two treatment groups as well as the length and dosage of statin treatment of the about 25% of patients taking statins before the enrollment."( REVERSAL and PROVE-IT: are clinically oriented trials really better than "pure" scientific studies?
Cicero, AF; Gaddi, A, 2005
)
0.33
" Group I-treated with pravastatin, group II--with simvastatin--both drugs in a dosage of 40 mg/kg daily, 5 days/week for a total of 3 weeks."( Effect of pravastatin, simvastatin and atorvastatin on the phagocytic activity of mouse peritoneal macrophages.
Bergman, M; Bessler, H; Djaldetti, M; Salman, H, 2006
)
1.05
" Application of the square-wave voltammetric method to determination of pravastatin in a pharmaceutical dosage form, without sample pretreatment, resulted in acceptable deviation from the stated concentration."( Electrochemical properties and square-wave voltammetric determination of pravastatin.
Nigović, B, 2006
)
0.8
" Resolution on reduction of dosage or discontinuance and/or change of statin were deemed to constitute confirmation of cause."( Safety of statins when response is carefully monitored: a study of 336 heart recipients.
Aldama-López, G; Campo-Pérez, R; Castro-Beiras, A; Crespo-Leiro, MG; Llinares-García, D; Marzoa-Rivas, R; Muñiz-Garcia, J; Paniagua-Marin, MJ; Piñón-Esteban, P, 2005
)
0.33
"We searched Medline, the international medical database, to conduct a systematic review of the literature on the efficacy and tolerability of statins in CKD and renal transplant patients and on specific recommendations for dosage adjustments in this population."( [Statins in patients with kidney failure: efficacy, tolerance, and prescription guidelines in patients with chronic kidney disease and renal transplant].
Deray, G; Isnard-Bagnis, C; Karie, S; Launay-Vacher, V, 2006
)
0.33
" Although most statins are not excreted by the kidneys, the dosage of some must be adapted in CKD patients because of pharmacokinetic modifications induced by renal impairment."( [Statins in patients with kidney failure: efficacy, tolerance, and prescription guidelines in patients with chronic kidney disease and renal transplant].
Deray, G; Isnard-Bagnis, C; Karie, S; Launay-Vacher, V, 2006
)
0.33
" Control mice received an equimolar dosage of the parent statin compound, pravastatin."( Nitropravastatin stimulates reparative neovascularisation and improves recovery from limb Ischaemia in type-1 diabetic mice.
Campesi, I; Emanueli, C; Gadau, S; Kraenkel, N; Madeddu, P; Meloni, M; Monopoli, A; Ongini, E, 2007
)
1.08
" The results suggest that the effect of hydrophobic statins on the engulfing capacity of human peripheral blood phagocytes and apoptosis is dependent on their dosage and physiochemical properties."( Hydrophobic but not hydrophilic statins enhance phagocytosis and decrease apoptosis of human peripheral blood cells in vitro.
Bergman, M; Bessler, H; Djaldetti, M; Salman, H, 2008
)
0.35
" Our objective was to explore how differences in prevalences of use, dosing characteristics, choice of statin and continuity of therapy in individual patients adds new information to previous results."( Aspects of statin prescribing in Norwegian counties with high, average and low statin consumption - an individual-level prescription database study.
Eggen, AE; Engeland, A; Furu, K; Hartz, I; Njølstad, I; Sakshaug, S; Skurtveit, S, 2007
)
0.34
" Patients were excluded if the dosage of their antidiabetic drugs was changed, if their drug therapy was altered within 3 months before starting statin therapy, or if events occurred that could affect glycemic control such as hospitalization."( Influence of pitavastatin on glucose tolerance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Kadonosono, K; Takano, T; Tanaka, S; Terauchi, Y; Yamakawa, T, 2008
)
0.35
" The anti-inflammatory effect of pravastatin showed no obvious difference between the two dosage groups."( Effects of pravastatin on the function of dendritic cells in patients with coronary heart disease.
Cheng, JL; Cui, J; Dong, M; Jiang, SL; Li, QS; Li, X; Liu, C; Peng, CH; Tian, Y, 2009
)
1.02
" Recent studies have shown statins prevented CIN after contrast media exposure, but optimal statin type and dosage are still unknown."( Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy by chronic pravastatin treatment in patients with cardiovascular disease and renal insufficiency.
Iwasaka, T; Kamihata, H; Manabe, K; Motohiro, M; Nakamura, S; Senoo, T; Sugiura, T; Yoshida, S, 2009
)
0.6
" In this study, increasing the dosage of pravastatin was investigated to determine whether it had a clearly favorable effect on the adiponectin level in hypercholesterolemic patients."( Effects of increasing the dose of pravastatin on serum adiponectin level in Japanese mild hypercholesterolemic and hypertensive patients.
Kai, T; Kanamasa, K, 2009
)
0.9
"Treatment with a low dosage of fluvastatin sodium or pravastatin sodium reduced the lipid build-up as well as the macrophages in the choroid and restored the vascular lumens of choroidal vessels independently of the cholesterol effect."( Low-dosage statins reduce choroidal damage in hypercholesterolemic rabbits.
de Hoz, R; Mendez, T; Ramírez, AI; Ramírez, JM; Raposo, R; Redondo, A; Rojas, B; Salazar, JJ; Tejerina, T; Triviño, A, 2011
)
0.62
" We proposed a systematic classification scheme using FDA-approved drug labeling to assess the DILI potential of drugs, which yielded a benchmark dataset with 287 drugs representing a wide range of therapeutic categories and daily dosage amounts."( FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
Chen, M; Fang, H; Liu, Z; Shi, Q; Tong, W; Vijay, V, 2011
)
0.37
" The program's successful prediction in DDI tendency might indicate its application in optimizing the dosage regimen and reducing the risk of clinical trial."( [Prediction of the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction of pravastatin and pitavastatin with cyclosporine by a digital liver model based on metabolism and transporter].
Lin, ZQ; Yang, J; Yin, XF, 2011
)
0.61
"38 times higher than the oral dosage form, indicating its therapeutic potential in the treatment of atherosclerosis."( Biopolymeric mucoadhesive bilayer patch of pravastatin sodium for buccal delivery and treatment of patients with atherosclerosis.
Dhiman, MK; Petkar, K; Sawant, K; Yedurkar, P, 2013
)
0.65
" This study shows a simple and fast method validation by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography in the linear range 28 to 52 µg/mL to quantify lovastatin, pravastatin sodium or simvastatin in bulk drug or dosage forms."( Development and validation of a simple and fast HPLC method for determination of lovastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin.
de Oliveira, RB; Oliveira, MA; Silva, TD; Vianna-Soares, CD, 2012
)
0.79
" The type and dosage of concomitant drugs were not changed during the study periods."( Association of cholesteryl ester transfer protein mass with peripheral leukocyte count following statin therapy: a pilot study.
Hirayama, A; Nagao, K; Tani, S, 2012
)
0.38
" Micro/small dosing is useful for examining the mechanism of drug interactions without safety concern."( Mechanisms of pharmacokinetic enhancement between ritonavir and saquinavir; micro/small dosing tests using midazolam (CYP3A4), fexofenadine (p-glycoprotein), and pravastatin (OATP1B1) as probe drugs.
Ando, Y; Deguchi, M; Hirota, T; Ieiri, I; Irie, S; Izumi, N; Kanda, E; Kimura, M; Kotani, N; Kusuhara, H; Maeda, K; Matsuguma, K; Matsuki, S; Morishita, M; Okuzono, T; Sugiyama, Y; Tsunemitsu, S; Yamane, N, 2013
)
0.59
" This dosage was selected on the basis of its expected -20% efficacy in reducing low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol."( Nutraceutical approach to moderate cardiometabolic risk: results of a randomized, double-blind and crossover study with Armolipid Plus.
Arnoldi, A; Bosisio, R; Calabresi, L; Gomaraschi, M; Macchi, C; Magni, P; Mombelli, G; Pavanello, C; Pazzucconi, F; Ruscica, M; Sirtori, CR,
)
0.13
"These results suggest that a randomized trial with a larger sample size and a higher dosage of pravastatin would be helpful in further evaluating the anti-inflammatory properties of pravastatin, its association with improvements in cognitive symptoms, and its potential to reduce positive and negative symptoms associated with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders."( A randomized placebo-controlled pilot study of pravastatin as an adjunctive therapy in schizophrenia patients: effect on inflammation, psychopathology, cognition and lipid metabolism.
Borba, CP; Cather, C; Cleary, SM; Copeland, PM; Fan, X; Freudenreich, O; Henderson, DC; Oppenheim, CE; Petruzzi, LJ; Stock, S; Vincenzi, B, 2014
)
0.88
" It is a major determinant of half-life and dosing frequency of a drug."( Volume of Distribution in Drug Design.
Beaumont, K; Di, L; Maurer, TS; Smith, DA, 2015
)
0.42
" Selection criteria comprised 28 subcriteria under the following main criteria: clinical efficacy, best publish evidence and experience, adverse effects, drug interaction, dosing time, and fixed dose combination availability."( Statin Selection in Qatar Based on Multi-indication Pharmacotherapeutic Multi-criteria Scoring Model, and Clinician Preference.
Al-Badriyeh, D; Al-Khal, A; Alabbadi, I; Fahey, M; Zaidan, M, 2015
)
0.42
"We have used three dimensional (3D) extrusion printing to manufacture a multi-active solid dosage form or so called polypill."( 3D printing of five-in-one dose combination polypill with defined immediate and sustained release profiles.
Alexander, MR; Burley, JC; Khaled, SA; Roberts, CJ; Yang, J, 2015
)
0.42
"Extemporaneously prepared liquid dosage forms are needed to administer required medications in infants and young children."( Stability of Levothyroxine, Doxycycline, Hydrocortisone, and Pravastatin in Liquid Dosage Forms Stored at Two Temperatures.
Nahata, MC,
)
0.37
" We considered any type and dosage of statin as eligible, as long as the control and experimental arms differed only in the timing of the administration of the same statin."( Chronotherapy versus conventional statins therapy for the treatment of hyperlipidaemia.
Añino Alba, A; Fernandez-Esteban, I; Fernandez-Tabera, JM; Gómez Álvarez, P; Izquierdo-Palomares, JM; Martin-Carrillo, P; Pinar López, Ó; Plana, MN; Saiz, LC, 2016
)
0.43
" Electronic pharmacy records were used to abstract information on the type, length, and dosage of statin exposures starting in the year prior to diagnosis."( Influence of Statins and Cholesterol on Mortality Among Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
Chang, JI; Huang, BZ; Li, E; Wu, BU; Xiang, AH, 2017
)
0.46
" Using the median of the first year cumulative statin dosage as a cut-off point, patients were classified into either a high-dose or low-dose group."( Intensive statin regimens for reducing risk of cardiovascular diseases among human immunodeficiency virus-infected population: A nation-wide longitudinal cohort study 2000-2011.
Chang, KC; Ko, NY; Li, CY; Ou, HT; Yang, CY, 2017
)
0.46
" No consistent differences in plasma exposure of atorvastatin or M1 were observed in mice after single or repeat dosing of atorvastatin with or without mineral oil."( Effects of mineral oil administration on the pharmacokinetics, metabolism and pharmacodynamics of atorvastatin and pravastatin in mice and dogs.
Abrahamsson, B; Agrawal, R; Bergenholm, L; Björkbom, A; Bright, J; Cavallin, A; Gopaul, VS; Hammarberg, M; Hawthorne, G; Hurt-Camejo, E; Jansson-Löfmark, R; Jarke, A; Johansson, MJ; Li, X; Lundborg, E; Pieterman, EJ; Princen, HMG; Svensson, L, 2021
)
0.83
" Twice-weekly dosing with VSW1198 at the previously established maximally tolerated dose in combination with a statin led to hepatotoxicity, while once-weekly VSW1198-based combinations were feasible."( In vivo evaluation of combination therapy targeting the isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway.
Chhonker, Y; Haney, SL; Holstein, SA; Murry, DJ; Smith, LM; Talmon, G; Varney, ML, 2021
)
0.62
" Only rosuvastatin was assessed in a repeated dosing PK study."( A systematic review on pharmacokinetics, cardiovascular outcomes and safety profiles of statins in cirrhosis.
Abraldes, JG; Al-Karaghouli, M; Cabrera Garcia, L; Kalainy, S; Sung, S, 2021
)
0.62
" We report the pravastatin pharmacokinetic parameters including pravastatin area under the curve (total drug exposure over a dosing interval), apparent oral clearance, half-life, and others during pregnancy and compare it with those values measured during the postpartum period."( A randomized pilot clinical trial of pravastatin versus placebo in pregnant patients at high risk of preeclampsia.
Ahmed, MS; Caritis, S; Clark, S; Costantine, MM; Rytting, E; Stika, CS; Venkataramanan, R; Wang, X; West, H; Wisner, KL, 2021
)
1.25
" A dose-response relationship was also found, with higher cumulative defined daily doses and higher daily intensity of statin use associated with lower mortality."( Statin Use During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Improved Survival Outcomes in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Nationwide Cohort Study.
Chen, M; Chen, WM; Shia, BC; Wu, SY; Yu, YH, 2023
)
0.91
" Furthermore, we found a dose-response relationship of statin use associated with lower ESCC-specific mortality."( Statin Use During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Improved Survival Outcomes in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Nationwide Cohort Study.
Chen, M; Chen, WM; Shia, BC; Wu, SY; Yu, YH, 2023
)
0.91
" Log dose-response data over the doses of 5 mg to 160 mg revealed strong linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, and a weak linear dose-related effect on blood triglycerides."( Pravastatin for lowering lipids.
Adams, SP; Alaeiilkhchi, N; Tasnim, S; Wright, JM, 2023
)
2.35
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (4)

RoleDescription
metaboliteAny intermediate or product resulting from metabolism. The term 'metabolite' subsumes the classes commonly known as primary and secondary metabolites.
anticholesteremic drugA substance used to lower plasma cholesterol levels.
xenobioticA xenobiotic (Greek, xenos "foreign"; bios "life") is a compound that is foreign to a living organism. Principal xenobiotics include: drugs, carcinogens and various compounds that have been introduced into the environment by artificial means.
environmental contaminantAny minor or unwanted substance introduced into the environment that can have undesired effects.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (8)

ClassDescription
3-hydroxy carboxylic acidAny hydroxy carboxylic acid which contains a hydroxy group located beta- to the carboxylic acid group.
hydroxy monocarboxylic acidAny monocarboxylic acid which also contains a separate (alcoholic or phenolic) hydroxy substituent.
carboxylic esterAn ester of a carboxylic acid, R(1)C(=O)OR(2), where R(1) = H or organyl and R(2) = organyl.
secondary alcoholA secondary alcohol is a compound in which a hydroxy group, -OH, is attached to a saturated carbon atom which has two other carbon atoms attached to it.
carbobicyclic compoundA bicyclic compound in which all the ring atoms are carbon.
statin (semi-synthetic)A statin that is derived from a naturally occurring statin by partial chemical synthesis.
lignanAny phenylpropanoid derived from phenylalanine via dimerization of substituted cinnamic alcohols, known as monolignols, to a dibenzylbutane skeleton. Note that while individual members of the class have names ending ...lignane, ...lignene, ...lignadiene, etc., the class names lignan, neolignan, etc., do not end with an "e".
glycosideA glycosyl compound resulting from the attachment of a glycosyl group to a non-acyl group RO-, RS-, RSe-, etc. The bond between the glycosyl group and the non-acyl group is called a glycosidic bond. By extension, the terms N-glycosides and C-glycosides are used as class names for glycosylamines and for compounds having a glycosyl group attached to a hydrocarbyl group respectively. These terms are misnomers and should not be used. The preferred terms are glycosylamines and C-glycosyl compounds, respectively.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (1)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
Pravastatin Action Pathway2143

Protein Targets (19)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
EWS/FLI fusion proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency27.05220.001310.157742.8575AID1259253; AID1259256
Spike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusPotency31.62280.009610.525035.4813AID1479145
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Solute carrier family 22 member 6Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki601.00001.60005.744010.0000AID598875; AID679489
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)190.00000.55003.70836.1000AID699544
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)Ki180.00000.53004.11578.4800AID699544
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.14520.00000.79498.9000AID1315659; AID625271; AID83165
Insulin receptor Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.00560.00010.78463.3700AID625271
Prostaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00560.00010.995010.0000AID625271
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.02540.00090.20949.0300AID1798004; AID1798163; AID384740
Solute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)408.00000.27004.53069.9000AID682026
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki172.00000.84004.968210.0000AID679034
Solute carrier family 22 member 8Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)13.70004.93007.39009.9200AID678815
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)62.00000.10472.71957.0795AID699543
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)Ki57.00000.08002.46889.8000AID699543
Solute carrier family 22 member 11Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)591.00002.03004.66507.3000AID678973
Solute carrier family 22 member 8Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)15.60006.03006.03006.0300AID678805
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)3.60000.05002.37979.7000AID699542
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)Ki3.40000.04401.36305.0000AID699542
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Other Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1A4Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Km37.50000.24003.28416.5300AID681820
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)Km2,250.00000.70005.00608.0900AID679476
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1A1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Km30.00000.01503.49967.0000AID679967
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Km223.00001.50004.34206.9000AID678896
Solute carrier family 22 member 8Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Km13.40000.73901.53952.3400AID681391
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)Km59.70000.00763.201810.0000AID678959; AID678960
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (88)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
cholesterol biosynthetic process3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
visual learning3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
coenzyme A metabolic process3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein catabolic process3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein secretion3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
long-term synaptic potentiation3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of amyloid-beta clearance3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
isoprenoid biosynthetic process3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
sterol biosynthetic process3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin biosynthetic processProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
angiogenesisProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
embryo implantationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
learningProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
memoryProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of blood pressureProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to nematodeProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to fructoseProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to manganese ionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor productionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cyclooxygenase pathwayProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
bone mineralizationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of prostaglandin biosynthetic processProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fever generationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of synaptic plasticityProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of synaptic transmission, dopaminergicProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to estradiolProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to vitamin DProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to heatProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to tumor necrosis factorProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
maintenance of blood-brain barrierProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein import into nucleusProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
hair cycleProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of nitric oxide biosynthetic processProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell cycleProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vasoconstrictionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of smooth muscle contractionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle contractionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
decidualizationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of inflammatory responseProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
brown fat cell differentiationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to glucocorticoidProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of calcium ion transportProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of synaptic transmission, glutamatergicProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to fatty acidProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to mechanical stimulusProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to lead ionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ATPProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to non-ionic osmotic stressProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to fluid shear stressProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transforming growth factor beta productionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell migration involved in sprouting angiogenesisProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fibroblast growth factor productionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of brown fat cell differentiationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of platelet-derived growth factor productionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular oxidant detoxificationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of neuroinflammatory responseProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to osmotic stressProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to homocysteineProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to angiotensinProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transportSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
inorganic anion transportSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transportSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
alpha-ketoglutarate transportSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transportSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
metanephric proximal tubule developmentSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
renal tubular secretionSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion transportSolute carrier family 22 member 8Homo sapiens (human)
response to toxic substanceSolute carrier family 22 member 8Homo sapiens (human)
inorganic anion transportSolute carrier family 22 member 8Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportSolute carrier family 22 member 8Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportSolute carrier family 22 member 8Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 8Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierSolute carrier family 22 member 8Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion transportSolute carrier family 22 member 11Homo sapiens (human)
inorganic anion transportSolute carrier family 22 member 11Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transportSolute carrier family 22 member 11Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportSolute carrier family 22 member 11Homo sapiens (human)
urate metabolic processSolute carrier family 22 member 11Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 11Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processSolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion transportSolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transportSolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportSolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
alpha-ketoglutarate transportSolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
thyroid hormone transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (25)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (NADPH) activity3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
protein binding3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
GTPase regulator activity3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
NADPH binding3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
coenzyme A binding3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
peroxidase activityProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase activityProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activity, acting on single donors with incorporation of molecular oxygen, incorporation of two atoms of oxygenProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
solute:inorganic anion antiporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
alpha-ketoglutarate transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
antiporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
chloride ion bindingSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
solute:inorganic anion antiporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 8Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 8Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 8Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 8Homo sapiens (human)
serine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
solute:inorganic anion antiporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 11Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSolute carrier family 22 member 11Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 11Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 11Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 11Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
alpha-ketoglutarate transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
thyroid hormone transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (19)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2B1 Homo sapiens (human)
peroxisomal membrane3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membrane3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membrane3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
peroxisomal membrane3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear inner membraneProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear outer membraneProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum lumenProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
caveolaProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
virion membraneSpike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus
plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
caveolaSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexSolute carrier family 22 member 6Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 8Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 8Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 8Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeSolute carrier family 22 member 8Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 11Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 11Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 11Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 11Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeSolute carrier family 22 member 11Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolSolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 7Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (296)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1698001Lipophilicity, log D of the compound at pH 7.4 by by shake flask method
AID313917Incidence of myalgia in human2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Hepatoselectivity of statins: design and synthesis of 4-sulfamoyl pyrroles as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID682168TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of benzylpenicillin uptake by Pravastatin at a concentration of 1000uM in Oat3-expressing oocyte cells2004The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Jun, Volume: 309, Issue:3
Mouse reduced in osteosclerosis transporter functions as an organic anion transporter 3 and is localized at abluminal membrane of blood-brain barrier.
AID1217707Time dependent inhibition of CYP2C19 in human liver microsomes at 100 uM by LC/MS system2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID1217712Time dependent inhibition of CYP2C8 (unknown origin) at 100 uM by LC/MS system2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID588217FDA HLAED, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID682026TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of PHA uptake (PHA: 5uM) in hOAT1-expressing S2 cells2004Journal of pharmacological sciences, Feb, Volume: 94, Issue:2
Interactions of human- and rat-organic anion transporters with pravastatin and cimetidine.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID588215FDA HLAED, alkaline phosphatase increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID313915Cmax in human2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Hepatoselectivity of statins: design and synthesis of 4-sulfamoyl pyrroles as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID678966TP_TRANSPORTER: Transepithelial Transport (basal to apical) in OATP1B1/BCRP double transfected MDCKII cells2005The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Sep, Volume: 314, Issue:3
Identification of the hepatic efflux transporters of organic anions using double-transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney II cells expressing human organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1)/multidrug resistance-associated protein 2, OATP1B1/multid
AID384762Hepatotoxicity in guinea pig assessed as hepatocellular degeneration at 200 mg/kg2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID588214FDA HLAED, liver enzyme composite activity2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1636440Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2D6-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 300 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of NA2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID681391TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake in Oat3-expressing LLC-PK1 cells2002The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Mar, Volume: 300, Issue:3
Functional involvement of rat organic anion transporter 3 (rOat3; Slc22a8) in the renal uptake of organic anions.
AID1217706Time dependent inhibition of CYP2C9 (unknown origin) at 100 uM by LC/MS system2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID312175Ratio of IC50 for cholesterol synthesis in rat myocytes to rat hepatocytes2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-10, Volume: 51, Issue:1
Substituted pyrazoles as hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: discovery of (3R,5R)-7-[2-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-4-isopropyl-5-(4-methyl-benzylcarbamoyl)-2H-pyrazol-3-yl]-3,5-dihydroxyheptanoic acid (PF-3052334) as a candidate for the treatment of hyper
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID679136TP_TRANSPORTER: Transepithelial Transport (basal to apical) in OATP1B1/MDR1 double transfected MDCKII cells2005The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Sep, Volume: 314, Issue:3
Identification of the hepatic efflux transporters of organic anions using double-transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney II cells expressing human organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1)/multidrug resistance-associated protein 2, OATP1B1/multid
AID1217710Covalent binding in human liver microsomes measured per mg of protein using radiolabelled compound at 10 uM after 1 hr incubation by liquid scintillation counting2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1315658Inhibition of human HMGR catalytic domain at 1 uM using HMG-CoA as substrate measured every 20 secs for 10 mins relative to control2016Journal of natural products, 06-24, Volume: 79, Issue:6
Lovastatin Analogues from the Soil-Derived Fungus Aspergillus sclerotiorum PSU-RSPG178.
AID444057Fraction escaping hepatic elimination in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1211548In vivo apparent biliary clearance in iv dosed Sprague-Dawley rat by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 40, Issue:3
In vivo biliary clearance should be predicted by intrinsic biliary clearance in sandwich-cultured hepatocytes.
AID1398781Inhibition of human HMG-CoA reductase catalytic domain at 1 uM using HMG-CoA as substrate measured every 20 secs for 10 mins relative to control2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:15
Asperidines A-C, pyrrolidine and piperidine derivatives from the soil-derived fungus Aspergillus sclerotiorum PSU-RSPG178.
AID679887TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake in OATP-A-expressing 293c18 cell1999The Journal of biological chemistry, Dec-24, Volume: 274, Issue:52
A novel human hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP2). Identification of a liver-specific human organic anion transporting polypeptide and identification of rat and human hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor transporters.
AID1698003Fraction unbound in rat plasma
AID313913Selectivity, ratio of IC50 for rat hepatocyte to IC50 for rat L6 myocyte2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Hepatoselectivity of statins: design and synthesis of 4-sulfamoyl pyrroles as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID176793In vivo ability to inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis from [14C]acetate after a single oral administration in female rats1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 38, Issue:17
(Aryloxy)methylsilane derivatives as new cholesterol biosynthesis inhibitors: synthesis and hypocholesterolemic activity of a new class of squalene epoxidase inhibitors.
AID1217709Time dependent inhibition of CYP3A4 (unknown origin) at 100 uM by LC/MS system2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID679967TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake in Oatp1-expressing 293c18 cells1999The Journal of biological chemistry, Dec-24, Volume: 274, Issue:52
A novel human hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP2). Identification of a liver-specific human organic anion transporting polypeptide and identification of rat and human hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor transporters.
AID185290The compound was tested in vivo for the inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis in chow-fed rats at 1.0 mg/kg; not determined1992Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-29, Volume: 35, Issue:11
Inhibitors of cholesterol biosynthesis. 6. trans-6-[2-(2-N-heteroaryl-3,5-disubstituted- pyrazol-4-yl)ethyl/ethenyl]tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-2H-pyran-2-ones.
AID444058Volume of distribution at steady state in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID678805TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of ES uptake (ES: 50nM) in rOAT3-expressing S2 cells2004Journal of pharmacological sciences, Feb, Volume: 94, Issue:2
Interactions of human- and rat-organic anion transporters with pravastatin and cimetidine.
AID384741Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in rat hepatocytes assessed as incorporation of [14C]acetate into cholesterol2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID681381TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of calcein-AM efflux in MDR1-expressing MDCK cells2005Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 33, Issue:4
Differential interaction of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coa reductase inhibitors with ABCB1, ABCC2, and OATP1B1.
AID386623Inhibition of 4-(4-(dimethylamino)styryl)-N-methylpyridinium uptake at human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells at 100 uM by confocal microscopy2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 51, Issue:19
Structural requirements for drug inhibition of the liver specific human organic cation transport protein 1.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID384758Hepatotoxicity in guinea pig assessed as increase in aspartate aminotransferase level relative to control2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID1217729Intrinsic clearance for reactive metabolites formation assessed as summation of [3H]GSH adduct formation rate-based reactive metabolites formation and cytochrome P450 (unknown origin) inactivation rate-based reactive metabolites formation2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID444051Total clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID444053Renal clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1211870Total biliary clearance in iv dosed rat2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 41, Issue:2
Species differences in biliary clearance and possible relevance of hepatic uptake and efflux transporters involvement.
AID384750Reduction in plasma total cholesterol level in guinea pig at 200 mg/kg after 10 days2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID1212341Cytotoxicity against human Fa2N-4 cells by lactate dehydrogenase assay2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 41, Issue:4
Lysosomal sequestration (trapping) of lipophilic amine (cationic amphiphilic) drugs in immortalized human hepatocytes (Fa2N-4 cells).
AID679476TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake (pH 5.0) in OATP-B-expressing HEK293 cells2004The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Feb, Volume: 308, Issue:2
Functional characterization of pH-sensitive organic anion transporting polypeptide OATP-B in human.
AID1697999Dissociation constant, acidic pKa of compound measured up to 18 mins by capillary electrophoresis
AID1211849Unbound biliary clearance in iv dosed human after 24 hrs by T-tube method2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 41, Issue:2
Species differences in biliary clearance and possible relevance of hepatic uptake and efflux transporters involvement.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID599893Hypolipidemic activity in chow fed Hartley guinea pig assessed as reduction of LDL level administered orally for 7 days measured on day 8 after 2 hrs post dose2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-01, Volume: 21, Issue:9
Discovery of novel hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for treating hypercholesterolemia: a bench-to-bedside case study on tissue selective drug distribution.
AID312180Reduction of LDL level in po dosed Hartley guinea pig plasma after 7 days2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-10, Volume: 51, Issue:1
Substituted pyrazoles as hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: discovery of (3R,5R)-7-[2-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-4-isopropyl-5-(4-methyl-benzylcarbamoyl)-2H-pyrazol-3-yl]-3,5-dihydroxyheptanoic acid (PF-3052334) as a candidate for the treatment of hyper
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID384744Partition coefficient, log P by reverse phase HPLC method2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID1217708Time dependent inhibition of CYP2D6 (unknown origin) at 100 uM by LC/MS system2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID699539Inhibition of human liver OATP1B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID681366TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of estradiol-17beta-glucuronide uptake(estradiol-17beta-glucuronide:0.02uM) in OATP1B1-expressing HEK293 cells2005Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 33, Issue:4
Differential interaction of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coa reductase inhibitors with ABCB1, ABCC2, and OATP1B1.
AID385189Myotoxicity in po dosed weanling Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as drug dose causing >2.5 fold increase in plasma creatine kinase activity relative to control2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID600037Drug uptake by rat hepatic OATP1A1 transporters expressed in CHO cells at 1 uM relative to wild type CHO cells2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-01, Volume: 21, Issue:9
Discovery of novel hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for treating hypercholesterolemia: a bench-to-bedside case study on tissue selective drug distribution.
AID598875Inhibition of rat Oat1 expressed in pig LLC-PK11 cells2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 19, Issue:11
Elucidation of common pharmacophores from analysis of targeted metabolites transported by the multispecific drug transporter-Organic anion transporter1 (Oat1).
AID1211829Total biliary clearance in iv dosed human after 24 hrs by T-tube method2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 41, Issue:2
Species differences in biliary clearance and possible relevance of hepatic uptake and efflux transporters involvement.
AID1636356Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2C9-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 300 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of NA2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID313912Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in rat L6 myocyte2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Hepatoselectivity of statins: design and synthesis of 4-sulfamoyl pyrroles as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID83165Tested in vitro for the inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase from partially purified microsomal preparations.1992Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-29, Volume: 35, Issue:11
Inhibitors of cholesterol biosynthesis. 6. trans-6-[2-(2-N-heteroaryl-3,5-disubstituted- pyrazol-4-yl)ethyl/ethenyl]tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-2H-pyran-2-ones.
AID588219FDA HLAED, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID384748Reduction in plasma total cholesterol level in guinea pig after 10 days2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID1217728Intrinsic clearance for reactive metabolites formation per mg of protein based on cytochrome P450 (unknown origin) inactivation rate by TDI assay2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID23913Calculated partition coefficient (clogP) (active dihydroxy acid form)1992Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-29, Volume: 35, Issue:11
Inhibitors of cholesterol biosynthesis. 6. trans-6-[2-(2-N-heteroaryl-3,5-disubstituted- pyrazol-4-yl)ethyl/ethenyl]tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-2H-pyran-2-ones.
AID86224In vitro ability to inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis in HepG2 cells in culture from [14C]mevalonate1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 38, Issue:17
(Aryloxy)methylsilane derivatives as new cholesterol biosynthesis inhibitors: synthesis and hypocholesterolemic activity of a new class of squalene epoxidase inhibitors.
AID682067TP_TRANSPORTER: transepithelial transport (basal to apical) in MRP2- and OATP-C-expressing MDCKII cells2002The Journal of biological chemistry, Feb-22, Volume: 277, Issue:8
Transcellular transport of organic anions across a double-transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney II cell monolayer expressing both human organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP2/SLC21A6) and Multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2/ABCC2).
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID678712Inhibition of human CYP1A2 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using ethoxyresorufin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID496784Induction of cell differentiation in mouse C2C12 cells assessed as myosin heavy chain expression at 10 uM in presence of 250 uM cholesterol2010Nature chemical biology, Mar, Volume: 6, Issue:3
Carbon metabolism-mediated myogenic differentiation.
AID204661In vitro inhibitory activity against pig liver microsomal squalene epoxidase1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 38, Issue:17
(Aryloxy)methylsilane derivatives as new cholesterol biosynthesis inhibitors: synthesis and hypocholesterolemic activity of a new class of squalene epoxidase inhibitors.
AID600043Drug uptake by rat hepatic OATP1A1 transporters expressed in CHO cells at 10 uM relative to wild type CHO cells2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-01, Volume: 21, Issue:9
Discovery of novel hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for treating hypercholesterolemia: a bench-to-bedside case study on tissue selective drug distribution.
AID567091Drug absorption in human assessed as human intestinal absorption rate2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 46, Issue:1
Prediction of drug intestinal absorption by new linear and non-linear QSPR.
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID678716Inhibition of human CYP3A4 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using diethoxyfluorescein as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID444054Oral bioavailability in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID699544Inhibition of human liver OATP2B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E3S uptake incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID678960TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake in OATP-C-expressing 293c18 cells1999The Journal of biological chemistry, Dec-24, Volume: 274, Issue:52
A novel human hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP2). Identification of a liver-specific human organic anion transporting polypeptide and identification of rat and human hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor transporters.
AID697693Drug uptake in human hepatocytes in presence of pan OATP inhibitor rifamycin2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-09, Volume: 55, Issue:3
Discovery of (S)-6-(3-cyclopentyl-2-(4-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-imidazol-1-yl)propanamido)nicotinic acid as a hepatoselective glucokinase activator clinical candidate for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.
AID588218FDA HLAED, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID679034TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of DNP-SG uptake in bile canalicular membrane vesicles from SD rat1997Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Oct, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Biliary excretion of pravastatin in rats: contribution of the excretion pathway mediated by canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter.
AID600044Drug uptake by human hepatic OATP1B1 transporter expressed in HEK293 cells at 1 uM relative to wild type HEK293 cells2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-01, Volume: 21, Issue:9
Discovery of novel hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for treating hypercholesterolemia: a bench-to-bedside case study on tissue selective drug distribution.
AID600039Drug uptake by rat hepatic OATP1B2 transporters expressed in CHO cells at 1 uM relative to wild type CHO cells2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-01, Volume: 21, Issue:9
Discovery of novel hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for treating hypercholesterolemia: a bench-to-bedside case study on tissue selective drug distribution.
AID600042Drug uptake by rat hepatic OATP1A4 transporters expressed in CHO cells at 10 uM relative to wild type CHO cells2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-01, Volume: 21, Issue:9
Discovery of novel hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for treating hypercholesterolemia: a bench-to-bedside case study on tissue selective drug distribution.
AID385211Myotoxicity in guinea pig assessed as drug dose causing >10 fold increase in plasma creatine kinase activity relative to control2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID570995Antimalarial activity against Plasmodium falciparum infected in mouse assessed as mouse survival at 200 mg/kg, ip, qd administered 5 days post infection for 3 days measured after 6 days relative to control2008Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 52, Issue:11
Statins alone are ineffective in cerebral malaria but potentiate artesunate.
AID1698004Fraction unbound in cynomolgus monkey plasma
AID1315661Binding affinity to human HMGR catalytic domain at 0.225 uM in presence of 800 to 3200 uM HMG-CoA as substrate measured every 20 secs for 10 mins2016Journal of natural products, 06-24, Volume: 79, Issue:6
Lovastatin Analogues from the Soil-Derived Fungus Aspergillus sclerotiorum PSU-RSPG178.
AID1211810Drug excretion in iv dosed human assessed as compound excreted into bile after 24 hrs by T-tube method2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 41, Issue:2
Species differences in biliary clearance and possible relevance of hepatic uptake and efflux transporters involvement.
AID467613Volume of distribution at steady state in human2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 44, Issue:11
Prediction of volume of distribution values in human using immobilized artificial membrane partitioning coefficients, the fraction of compound ionized and plasma protein binding data.
AID678959TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake in OATP1B1-expressing HEK293 cells2005Pharmacogenetics and genomics, Jul, Volume: 15, Issue:7
Functional characterization of SLCO1B1 (OATP-C) variants, SLCO1B1*5, SLCO1B1*15 and SLCO1B1*15+C1007G, by using transient expression systems of HeLa and HEK293 cells.
AID679431TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake (pH 5.0) of Pravastatin at a concentration of 14.7 u M in OATP-B-expressing HEK293 cells2004The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Feb, Volume: 308, Issue:2
Functional characterization of pH-sensitive organic anion transporting polypeptide OATP-B in human.
AID679828TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of PGF2alpha uptake (PGF2: 50nM) in rOAT2-expressing S2 cells2004Journal of pharmacological sciences, Feb, Volume: 94, Issue:2
Interactions of human- and rat-organic anion transporters with pravastatin and cimetidine.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID600335Drug uptake by human hepatic OATP1B3 transporter expressed in HEK293 cells at 10 uM relative to wild-type HEK293 cells2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-01, Volume: 21, Issue:9
Discovery of novel hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for treating hypercholesterolemia: a bench-to-bedside case study on tissue selective drug distribution.
AID625277FDA Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base Benchmark Dataset (LTKB-BD) drugs of less concern for DILI2011Drug discovery today, Aug, Volume: 16, Issue:15-16
FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
AID588216FDA HLAED, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID385190Safety index, ratio of ED50 for inhibition of hepatic cholesterol synthesis in Sprague-Dawley rat to drug dose not causing >2.5 fold increase in plasma creatine kinase level in weanling Sprague-Dawley rat2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID384756Myotoxicity in guinea pig assessed as increase in plasma creatine kinase activity at >200 mg/kg after 10 days relative to control2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID699543Inhibition of human liver OATP1B3 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E17-betaG uptake incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID86692In vitro inhibitory activity was evaluated on cholesterol biosynthesis in HepG2 cells2004Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-09, Volume: 14, Issue:3
Synthesis and biological activity of a novel squalene epoxidase inhibitor, FR194738.
AID384742Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in rat L6 cells assessed as incorporation of [14C]acetate into cholesterol2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID678815TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of ES uptake (ES: 50nM) in hOAT3-expressing S2 cells2004Journal of pharmacological sciences, Feb, Volume: 94, Issue:2
Interactions of human- and rat-organic anion transporters with pravastatin and cimetidine.
AID1698000Apparent permeability in dog MDCKII-LE cells at pH 7.4
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID697691Drug uptake in human hepatocytes assessed per mg of protein2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-09, Volume: 55, Issue:3
Discovery of (S)-6-(3-cyclopentyl-2-(4-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-imidazol-1-yl)propanamido)nicotinic acid as a hepatoselective glucokinase activator clinical candidate for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.
AID384757Hepatotoxicity in guinea pig assessed as increase in alanine aminotransferase level relative to control2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID600041Drug uptake by rat hepatic OATP1B2 transporters expressed in CHO cells at 10 uM relative to wild type CHO cells2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-01, Volume: 21, Issue:9
Discovery of novel hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for treating hypercholesterolemia: a bench-to-bedside case study on tissue selective drug distribution.
AID444050Fraction unbound in human plasma2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID699540Inhibition of human liver OATP1B3 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID1211553Drug uptake in iv dosed Sprague-Dawley rat liver after 5 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 40, Issue:3
In vivo biliary clearance should be predicted by intrinsic biliary clearance in sandwich-cultured hepatocytes.
AID1217727Intrinsic clearance for reactive metabolites formation per mg of protein in human liver microsomes based on [3H]GSH adduct formation rate at 100 uM by [3H]GSH trapping assay2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID312173Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in rat hepatocytes2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-10, Volume: 51, Issue:1
Substituted pyrazoles as hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: discovery of (3R,5R)-7-[2-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-4-isopropyl-5-(4-methyl-benzylcarbamoyl)-2H-pyrazol-3-yl]-3,5-dihydroxyheptanoic acid (PF-3052334) as a candidate for the treatment of hyper
AID313916Ratio of Cmax for human to IC50 for rat L6 myocyte2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Hepatoselectivity of statins: design and synthesis of 4-sulfamoyl pyrroles as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID678715Inhibition of human CYP2D6 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 4-methylaminoethyl-7-methoxycoumarin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1217704Time dependent inhibition of CYP1A2 (unknown origin) at 100 uM by LC/MS system2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID600334Drug uptake by human hepatic OATP1B1 transporter expressed in HEK293 cells at 10 uM relative to wild type HEK293 cells2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-01, Volume: 21, Issue:9
Discovery of novel hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for treating hypercholesterolemia: a bench-to-bedside case study on tissue selective drug distribution.
AID496782Induction of cell differentiation in mouse C2C12 cells assessed as myosin heavy chain expression at 5 uM2010Nature chemical biology, Mar, Volume: 6, Issue:3
Carbon metabolism-mediated myogenic differentiation.
AID678714Inhibition of human CYP2C19 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 3-butyryl-7-methoxycoumarin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID600038Drug uptake by rat hepatic OATP1A4 transporters expressed in CHO cells at 1 uM relative to wild type CHO cells2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-01, Volume: 21, Issue:9
Discovery of novel hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for treating hypercholesterolemia: a bench-to-bedside case study on tissue selective drug distribution.
AID699542Inhibition of human liver OATP1B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in E17-betaG uptake by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID678896TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake in bile canalicular membrane vesicles from SD rat1997Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Oct, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Biliary excretion of pravastatin in rats: contribution of the excretion pathway mediated by canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter.
AID679421TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake (pH 7.4) of Pravastatin at a concentration of 14.7 u M in OATP-B-expressing HEK293 cells2004The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Feb, Volume: 308, Issue:2
Functional characterization of pH-sensitive organic anion transporting polypeptide OATP-B in human.
AID444055Fraction absorbed in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID384740Inhibition of HMGR in rat hepatic microsomes assessed as conversion of [14C]HMG-CoA to [14C]mevalonic acid2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID697692Drug uptake in rat hepatocytes in presence of pan OATP inhibitor rifamycin2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-09, Volume: 55, Issue:3
Discovery of (S)-6-(3-cyclopentyl-2-(4-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-imidazol-1-yl)propanamido)nicotinic acid as a hepatoselective glucokinase activator clinical candidate for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.
AID1211550In vivo intrinsic biliary clearance in iv dosed Sprague-Dawley rat by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 40, Issue:3
In vivo biliary clearance should be predicted by intrinsic biliary clearance in sandwich-cultured hepatocytes.
AID496783Induction of cell differentiation in mouse C2C12 cells assessed as myosin heavy chain expression at 10 uM2010Nature chemical biology, Mar, Volume: 6, Issue:3
Carbon metabolism-mediated myogenic differentiation.
AID1698009Hepatic clearance in cynomolgus monkey at < 1 mg/kg, iv administered as cassette dosing
AID678717Inhibition of human CYP3A4 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 7-benzyloxyquinoline as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1698006Ratio of drug level in cynomolgus monkey blood to plasma administered through iv dosing by LC-MS/MS analysis
AID1698005Ratio of drug level in Wistar Hannover rat blood to plasma administered through iv dosing by LC-MS/MS analysis
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID592682Apparent permeability from apical to basolateral side of human Caco2 cells after 2 hrs by LC/MS/MS analysis2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 19, Issue:8
QSAR-based permeability model for drug-like compounds.
AID313911Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in rat hepatocyte2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Hepatoselectivity of statins: design and synthesis of 4-sulfamoyl pyrroles as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID1636357Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 300 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of NA2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID1212314Drug uptake in lysosomes of human Fa2N-4 cells assessed as inhibition of LysoTracker Red fluorescence after 30 mins2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 41, Issue:4
Lysosomal sequestration (trapping) of lipophilic amine (cationic amphiphilic) drugs in immortalized human hepatocytes (Fa2N-4 cells).
AID1211551Drug uptake in sandwich cultured Sprague-Dawley rat hepatocytes by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 40, Issue:3
In vivo biliary clearance should be predicted by intrinsic biliary clearance in sandwich-cultured hepatocytes.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID588976Substrates of transporters of clinical importance in the absorption and disposition of drugs, BSEP2010Nature reviews. Drug discovery, Mar, Volume: 9, Issue:3
Membrane transporters in drug development.
AID1232319Volume of distribution at steady state in wild type mouse2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 58, Issue:15
Volume of Distribution in Drug Design.
AID1217705Time dependent inhibition of CYP2B6 (unknown origin) at 100 uM by LC/MS system2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID1283271Inhibition of HMGCoA reductase in Dhcr7-deficient mouse Neuro2a cells assessed as decrease in 7-DHC levels at 1 uM by LC-MS/GC-MS analysis2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 59, Issue:3
The Effect of Small Molecules on Sterol Homeostasis: Measuring 7-Dehydrocholesterol in Dhcr7-Deficient Neuro2a Cells and Human Fibroblasts.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID679489TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of PAH uptake in Oat1-expressing LLC-PK1 cells2002The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Mar, Volume: 300, Issue:3
Functional involvement of rat organic anion transporter 3 (rOat3; Slc22a8) in the renal uptake of organic anions.
AID678713Inhibition of human CYP2C9 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 7-methoxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin-3-acetic acid as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID444056Fraction escaping gut-wall elimination in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1211549Unbound fraction in Sprague-Dawley rat plasma at 100 uM by equilibrium dialysis method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 40, Issue:3
In vivo biliary clearance should be predicted by intrinsic biliary clearance in sandwich-cultured hepatocytes.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID503308Antiproliferative activity against human PC3 cells at 30 uM after 120 hrs by MTT assay relative to DMSO2006Nature chemical biology, Jun, Volume: 2, Issue:6
Identifying off-target effects and hidden phenotypes of drugs in human cells.
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID86222In vitro ability to inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis in HepG2 cells in culture from [14C]acetate1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 38, Issue:17
(Aryloxy)methylsilane derivatives as new cholesterol biosynthesis inhibitors: synthesis and hypocholesterolemic activity of a new class of squalene epoxidase inhibitors.
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID384743Selectivity index, ratio of IC50 for cholesterol synthesis in rat L6 cells to IC50 for cholesterol synthesis in rat hepatocytes2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID678985TP_TRANSPORTER: Transepithelial Transport (basal to apical) in OATP1B1/MRP2 double transfected MDCKII cells2005The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Sep, Volume: 314, Issue:3
Identification of the hepatic efflux transporters of organic anions using double-transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney II cells expressing human organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1)/multidrug resistance-associated protein 2, OATP1B1/multid
AID681820TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake in Xenopus laevis oocytes1999Pharmaceutical research, Jun, Volume: 16, Issue:6
Pravastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, is transported by rat organic anion transporting polypeptide, oatp2.
AID570990Antimalarial activity against Plasmodium falciparum infected in mouse assessed as parasitemia at 40 mg/kg, ip, qd administered 5 days post infection for 3 days measured after 6 days (Rvb =9.9+/-2.2 %)2008Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 52, Issue:11
Statins alone are ineffective in cerebral malaria but potentiate artesunate.
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID312174Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in rat L6 cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-10, Volume: 51, Issue:1
Substituted pyrazoles as hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: discovery of (3R,5R)-7-[2-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-4-isopropyl-5-(4-methyl-benzylcarbamoyl)-2H-pyrazol-3-yl]-3,5-dihydroxyheptanoic acid (PF-3052334) as a candidate for the treatment of hyper
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID444052Hepatic clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID681827TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake in Oatp2-expressing 293c18 cells1999The Journal of biological chemistry, Dec-24, Volume: 274, Issue:52
A novel human hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP2). Identification of a liver-specific human organic anion transporting polypeptide and identification of rat and human hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor transporters.
AID697690Drug uptake in rat hepatocytes assessed per mg of protein2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-09, Volume: 55, Issue:3
Discovery of (S)-6-(3-cyclopentyl-2-(4-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-imidazol-1-yl)propanamido)nicotinic acid as a hepatoselective glucokinase activator clinical candidate for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.
AID1698010Hepatic clearance in human administered through iv dosing
AID678722Covalent binding affinity to human liver microsomes assessed per mg of protein at 10 uM after 60 mins presence of NADPH2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID312172Inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase in Sprague-Dawley rat liver microsomes2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-10, Volume: 51, Issue:1
Substituted pyrazoles as hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: discovery of (3R,5R)-7-[2-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-4-isopropyl-5-(4-methyl-benzylcarbamoyl)-2H-pyrazol-3-yl]-3,5-dihydroxyheptanoic acid (PF-3052334) as a candidate for the treatment of hyper
AID570991Antimalarial activity against Plasmodium falciparum infected in mouse assessed as parasitemia at 200 mg/kg, ip, qd administered 5 days post infection for 3 days measured after 6 days (Rvb =9.9+/-2.2 %)2008Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 52, Issue:11
Statins alone are ineffective in cerebral malaria but potentiate artesunate.
AID680991TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of E1S uptake by Pravastatin at a concentration of 200uM in membrane vesicles from ABCG2-expressing P388 cells2003The Journal of biological chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 278, Issue:25
ABCG2 transports sulfated conjugates of steroids and xenobiotics.
AID680259TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Taurocholate uptake (Taurocholate: 0.5 uM, Pravastatin: 50 uM) in Oatp1-expressing 293c18 cells1999The Journal of biological chemistry, Dec-24, Volume: 274, Issue:52
A novel human hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP2). Identification of a liver-specific human organic anion transporting polypeptide and identification of rat and human hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor transporters.
AID570994Antimalarial activity against Plasmodium falciparum infected in mouse assessed as mouse survival at 40 mg/kg, ip, qd administered 5 days post infection for 3 days measured after 6 days relative to control2008Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 52, Issue:11
Statins alone are ineffective in cerebral malaria but potentiate artesunate.
AID1698007Ratio of drug level in human blood to plasma administered through iv dosing by LC-MS/MS analysis
AID476929Human intestinal absorption in po dosed human2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 45, Issue:3
Neural computational prediction of oral drug absorption based on CODES 2D descriptors.
AID1698008Hepatic clearance in Wistar Hannover rat at 1 mg/kg, iv
AID404304Effect on human MRP2-mediated estradiol-17-beta-glucuronide transport in Sf9 cells inverted membrane vesicles relative to control2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-12, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Prediction and identification of drug interactions with the human ATP-binding cassette transporter multidrug-resistance associated protein 2 (MRP2; ABCC2).
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID1698011Fraction unbound in human plasma
AID1315659Inhibition of human HMGR catalytic domain using 800 uM HMG-CoA as substrate measured every 20 secs for 10 mins2016Journal of natural products, 06-24, Volume: 79, Issue:6
Lovastatin Analogues from the Soil-Derived Fungus Aspergillus sclerotiorum PSU-RSPG178.
AID311524Oral bioavailability in human2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Hologram QSAR model for the prediction of human oral bioavailability.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID699541Inhibition of human liver OATP2B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E3S uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID467612Fraction unbound in human plasma2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 44, Issue:11
Prediction of volume of distribution values in human using immobilized artificial membrane partitioning coefficients, the fraction of compound ionized and plasma protein binding data.
AID678973TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of ES uptake (ES: 50nM) in hOAT4-expressing S2 cells2004Journal of pharmacological sciences, Feb, Volume: 94, Issue:2
Interactions of human- and rat-organic anion transporters with pravastatin and cimetidine.
AID312171Lipophilicity, log P of the compound2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-10, Volume: 51, Issue:1
Substituted pyrazoles as hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: discovery of (3R,5R)-7-[2-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-4-isopropyl-5-(4-methyl-benzylcarbamoyl)-2H-pyrazol-3-yl]-3,5-dihydroxyheptanoic acid (PF-3052334) as a candidate for the treatment of hyper
AID1211554Biliary excretion index in sandwich cultured Sprague-Dawley rat hepatocytes after 15 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 40, Issue:3
In vivo biliary clearance should be predicted by intrinsic biliary clearance in sandwich-cultured hepatocytes.
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID425652Total body clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID185126The compound form was tested in vivo for the inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis in chow-fed rats at 1.0 mg/kg; not determined1992Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-29, Volume: 35, Issue:11
Inhibitors of cholesterol biosynthesis. 6. trans-6-[2-(2-N-heteroaryl-3,5-disubstituted- pyrazol-4-yl)ethyl/ethenyl]tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-2H-pyran-2-ones.
AID467611Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 44, Issue:11
Prediction of volume of distribution values in human using immobilized artificial membrane partitioning coefficients, the fraction of compound ionized and plasma protein binding data.
AID1217711Metabolic activation in human liver microsomes assessed as [3H]GSH adduct formation rate measured per mg of protein at 100 uM by [3H]GSH trapping assay2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites.
AID679430TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake (pH 5.5) in OATP-B-expressing HEK293 cells2003The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Aug, Volume: 306, Issue:2
Involvement of human organic anion transporting polypeptide OATP-B (SLC21A9) in pH-dependent transport across intestinal apical membrane.
AID679512TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of PGF2alpha uptake (PGF2: 50nM) in hOAT2-expressing S2 cells2004Journal of pharmacological sciences, Feb, Volume: 94, Issue:2
Interactions of human- and rat-organic anion transporters with pravastatin and cimetidine.
AID1211555In vitro apparent biliary clearance in sandwich cultured Sprague-Dawley rat hepatocytes after 15 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 40, Issue:3
In vivo biliary clearance should be predicted by intrinsic biliary clearance in sandwich-cultured hepatocytes.
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID681370TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of calcein-AM efflux in MRP2-expressing MDCK cells2005Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 33, Issue:4
Differential interaction of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coa reductase inhibitors with ABCB1, ABCC2, and OATP1B1.
AID425653Renal clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID384745Partition coefficient, log P by octanol-water partitioning method2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID1698002Intrinsic clearance in cryopreserved human hepatocytes at 1 uM measured up to 120 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis
AID384747Inhibition of hepatic cholesterol synthesis in po dosed Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as incorporation of [14C]acetate into hepatic sterols2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID1211802Drug excretion in iv dosed rat assessed as compound excreted into bile2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 41, Issue:2
Species differences in biliary clearance and possible relevance of hepatic uptake and efflux transporters involvement.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID592683Apparent permeability from basolateral side to apical side of human Caco2 cells by LC/MS/MS analysis2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 19, Issue:8
QSAR-based permeability model for drug-like compounds.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID1211552In vitro intrinsic biliary clearance in sandwich cultured Sprague-Dawley rat hepatocytes by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 40, Issue:3
In vivo biliary clearance should be predicted by intrinsic biliary clearance in sandwich-cultured hepatocytes.
AID1211878Unbound biliary clearance in iv dosed rat2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 41, Issue:2
Species differences in biliary clearance and possible relevance of hepatic uptake and efflux transporters involvement.
AID600045Drug uptake by human hepatic OATP1B3 transporter expressed in HEK293 cells at 1 uM relative to wild-type HEK293 cells2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-01, Volume: 21, Issue:9
Discovery of novel hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for treating hypercholesterolemia: a bench-to-bedside case study on tissue selective drug distribution.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1346822Human hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (Lanosterol biosynthesis pathway)2001Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-21, Volume: 11, Issue:10
Synthesis and biological evaluations of condensed pyridine and condensed pyrimidine-based HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID1346838Rat hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (Lanosterol biosynthesis pathway)2001Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-21, Volume: 11, Issue:10
Synthesis and biological evaluations of condensed pyridine and condensed pyrimidine-based HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID1346822Human hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (Lanosterol biosynthesis pathway)1992Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-29, Volume: 35, Issue:11
Inhibitors of cholesterol biosynthesis. 6. trans-6-[2-(2-N-heteroaryl-3,5-disubstituted- pyrazol-4-yl)ethyl/ethenyl]tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-2H-pyran-2-ones.
AID1346822Human hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (Lanosterol biosynthesis pathway)2005Biochemistry, Sep-06, Volume: 44, Issue:35
Binding thermodynamics of statins to HMG-CoA reductase.
AID1346838Rat hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (Lanosterol biosynthesis pathway)2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-10, Volume: 51, Issue:1
Substituted pyrazoles as hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: discovery of (3R,5R)-7-[2-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-4-isopropyl-5-(4-methyl-benzylcarbamoyl)-2H-pyrazol-3-yl]-3,5-dihydroxyheptanoic acid (PF-3052334) as a candidate for the treatment of hyper
AID1346838Rat hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (Lanosterol biosynthesis pathway)1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 36, Issue:23
Inhibitors of cholesterol biosynthesis. 2. 3,5-Dihydroxy-7-(N-pyrrolyl)-6-heptenoates, a novel series of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID1346838Rat hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (Lanosterol biosynthesis pathway)2001The American journal of cardiology, Mar-08, Volume: 87, Issue:5A
Preclinical and clinical pharmacology of Rosuvastatin, a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor.
AID1798163HMG-CoA Reductase Enzyme Assay and Inhibition of Cellular Cholesterol Synthesis Assay from Article 10.1021/jm800001n: \\(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-Fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic Aci2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID1798004HMG-CoA Reductase Enzyme Assay and Inhibition of Cellular Cholesterol Synthesis Assay from Article 10.1021/jm070849r: \\Substituted pyrazoles as hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: discovery of (3R,5R)-7-[2-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-4-isopropyl-5-(4-meth2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-10, Volume: 51, Issue:1
Substituted pyrazoles as hepatoselective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: discovery of (3R,5R)-7-[2-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-4-isopropyl-5-(4-methyl-benzylcarbamoyl)-2H-pyrazol-3-yl]-3,5-dihydroxyheptanoic acid (PF-3052334) as a candidate for the treatment of hyper
AID1802450Oatp1d1 Transport Assay from Article 10.1074/jbc.M113.518506: \\Molecular characterization of zebrafish Oatp1d1 (Slco1d1), a novel organic anion-transporting polypeptide.\\2013The Journal of biological chemistry, Nov-22, Volume: 288, Issue:47
Molecular characterization of zebrafish Oatp1d1 (Slco1d1), a novel organic anion-transporting polypeptide.
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
AID1700793Protective activity against radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as head thrashes preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700810Memory enhancement effect in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans MT1434 harboring egl-30(n686) mutant assessed as memory index preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700805Inhibition of Gs-apha-coupled PKA pathway in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as down regulation of gsa-1 mRNA expression preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs qRT-PCR analysis2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700804Inhibition of Gq-alpha-coupled PLC pathway in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as up regulation of goa-1 mRNA expression preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs qRT-PCR analysis2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700818Activation of CREB in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans MY36 harboring [crh-1(tz2); Pmbr-1-mcherry::crh-1(mtIs18)] mutant assessed as increase in long-term memory preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 242020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700794Protective activity against radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as body bends preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700797Inhibition of neuropeptide pathway in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as down regulation of npr-2 mRNA expression preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs qRT-PCR analysis2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700801Inhibition of Gq-alpha-coupled PLC pathway in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as down regulation of egl-30 mRNA expression preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs qRT-PCR analysis2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700802Inhibition of Gs-apha-coupled PKA pathway in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as down regulation of kin-2 mRNA expression preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs qRT-PCR analysis2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700803Inhibition of Gq-alpha-coupled PLC pathway in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as down regulation of egl-8 mRNA expression preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs qRT-PCR analysis2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700817Activation of CREB in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans YT17 harboring crh-1(tz2) mutant assessed as reduction radiation-induced damage preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700796Inhibition of neuropeptide signaling pathway in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as down regulation of npr-11 mRNA expression preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs qRT-PCR analysis2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700792Protective activity against radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 at 0.05 to 0.2 mg/ml preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700807Inhibition of cGMP signaling pathway in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as down regulation of daf-11 mRNA expression preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs qRT-PCR analysis2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700809Inhibition of cGMP signaling pathway in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as down regulation of tax-4 mRNA expression preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs qRT-PCR analysis2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700795Protective activity against Butanone-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as chemotaxis index incubated for 1 hr2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700815Memory enhancement effect in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans assessed as increase in cAMP level preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700814Memory enhancement effect in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans harboring RNAi podr-1::unc-31 mutant assessed as memory index preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700813Memory enhancement effect in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans RB1341 harboring npl-1(ok1470) mutant assessed as memory index preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700791Memory enhancement effect in Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as increase in long-term memory index at 0.1 mg/ml preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700812Memory enhancement effect in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans harboring RNAi egl8;egl-30(n686)ls(Podr-1-mcherry::egl-30) mutant assessed as memory index preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700799Inhibition of neuropeptide pathway in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as down regulation of nlp-5 mRNA expression preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs qRT-PCR analysis2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700800Inhibition of neuropeptide pathway in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as down regulation of nlp-1 mRNA expression preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs qRT-PCR analysis2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700798Inhibition of neuropeptide pathway in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as down regulation of nlp-23 mRNA expression preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs qRT-PCR analysis2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700806Inhibition of cGMP signaling pathway in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as down regulation of odr-1 mRNA expression preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs qRT-PCR analysis2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700811Memory enhancement effect in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans MY66 harboring egl-30(n686);Podr-1-mcherry::egl-30(mtIs35)] mutant assessed as memory index preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700808Inhibition of cGMP signaling pathway in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans N2 assessed as down regulation of tax-2 mRNA expression preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs qRT-PCR analysis2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID1700816Activation of CREB in radioactive-induced Caenorhabditis elegans YT17 harboring crh-1(tz2) mutant assessed as increase in long-term memory preincubated for 24 hrs followed by gamma-radiation treatment and measured after 24 hrs2020Journal of natural products, 11-25, Volume: 83, Issue:11
AID779150Inhibition of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in human HEK293 cells at 20 uM after 24 hrs by dual luciferase reporter gene assay relative to vehicle-treated control2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-15, Volume: 23, Issue:20
Anti-proliferative activity of hydnocarpin, a natural lignan, is associated with the suppression of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in colon cancer cells.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (3,445)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-199035 (1.02)18.7374
1990's930 (27.00)18.2507
2000's1541 (44.73)29.6817
2010's813 (23.60)24.3611
2020's126 (3.66)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 95.62

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index95.62 (24.57)
Research Supply Index8.44 (2.92)
Research Growth Index6.29 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index174.58 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (95.62)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials1,036 (28.98%)5.53%
Trials0 (0.00%)5.53%
Reviews316 (8.84%)6.00%
Reviews1 (14.29%)6.00%
Case Studies129 (3.61%)4.05%
Case Studies0 (0.00%)4.05%
Observational9 (0.25%)0.25%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Other2,085 (58.32%)84.16%
Other6 (85.71%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (157)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
S0919, A Phase II Study of Idarubicin and Ara-C in Combination With Pravastatin for Poor-Risk Acute Myelogenous Leukemia [NCT00840177]Phase 2115 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-10Completed
Phase II Randomized Trial Evaluating the Administration of Sorafenib or Pravastatin or Association Sorafenib-pravastatin or Best Supportive Care for the Palliative Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patient With CHILD B Cirrhosis [NCT01357486]Phase 2160 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-14Completed
Statin Therapeutic Interchange by Pharmacist Collaborative Practice Process [NCT01222182]260 participants (Actual)Observational2009-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Followed by an Open Label Treatment Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Children and Adolescents With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia [NCT03510884]Phase 3153 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-31Completed
Curative Efficacy of Pravastatine in Patients Presented Delayed Cutaneous and Subcutaneous Radio-induced Fibrosis [NCT01268202]Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-17Completed
Pravastatin to Prevent Preeclampsia and Reduce Maternal-Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity in High Risk Preeclampsia Patients [NCT03648970]Phase 2280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-01Recruiting
Single Dose Two-Way Crossover Fed Bioequivalence Study of Pravastatin 80 mg Tablets in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01146093]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Primary Prevention of MACE With Standard and Intensive Statin Treatment in Hypercholesterolemia Patients With Concomitant Diabetes and Hypertension [NCT01173939]10,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-07-31Terminated(stopped due to With recommendation from IDMC, Steering Committee terminated this trial due to ethical concerns raised by J-ART study.)
"Improving Theempowerment in Patients With Severe Breast Fibrosis Radio-induced Treated by Pravastatin : Benefit of e-PROs (Electronic Patient Reported Outcome ) on Breast-related Quality of Life" [NCT04356209]Phase 2105 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-28Recruiting
Pravastatin and Alkali Therapy in Patients With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease [NCT04284657]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-30Enrolling by invitation
Statins: A New Therapeutic Option for Treatment of Patients With Endometriosis [NCT02079974]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Withdrawn
Single Dose Two-Way Crossover Fasting Bioequivalence Study of Pravastatin 80 mg Tablets in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01146106]Phase 143 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
Pharmacodynamics, Preliminary Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability After Multiple Oral Doses of 2.5 mg o.d. BIBB 515 BS (Capsule) or Pravastatin 20 mg Over 2 Weeks in Hyperlipemic Healthy Male Subjects (Parallel Group Comparison, Randomized, Placebo Controll [NCT02266485]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-07-31Completed
StAT-TB (Statin Adjunctive Therapy for TB): A Phase 2b Dose-finding Study of Pravastatin in Adults With Tuberculosis [NCT03882177]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-21Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lapaquistat Acetate 50 mg or Placebo When Co-administered With Statins in Subjects With Hypercholesterolemia, With an Optional Open-Label Extension [NCT00532311]Phase 3411 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Overall profile of the compound does not offer significant clinical advantage to patients over currently available lipid lowering agents)
Effects of Concomitant Administration of BMS-986195 on the Single-dose Pharmacokinetics of Methotrexate and Probe Substrates for Cytochrome P450 1A2, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 3A4, Organic Anion Transporter Polypeptide 1B1 and P-glycoprotein in Healthy Participants [NCT03131973]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-13Completed
A Single-Dose, Comparative, Bioavailability Study of Two Formulations of Pravastatin Sodium 80 mg Tablets Under Fasting Conditions [NCT00830258]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Pravastatin 80 mg Administered Once Daily to Hypercholesterolemic Subjects With Chronic, Well Compensated Liver Disease [NCT00529178]Phase 4232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (TIMI22) [NCT00382460]Phase 44,000 participants Interventional2000-11-30Completed
Real World Evidence Study for Assessing Statin Use for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Primary Care in Brazil [NCT05285085]2,133,900 participants (Actual)Observational2021-11-19Completed
[NCT02155530]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease Intervention Trial [NCT03073018]Phase 3864 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-04-30Completed
A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate OATP Transporter-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions Between Filgotinib and Statins as Probe Drugs in Healthy Participants [NCT04608344]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-04Completed
Intensive Statin Treatment in Chinese Coronary Artery Disease Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention(PCI) [NCT01293097]Phase 42,884 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Phase I, Open Label, Randomised, Parallel Group Study of Repeated Oral Doses of AZD1981 (100 mg Twice Daily and 400 mg Twice Daily Via Tablet) for Eight Days and Single Doses of Pravastatin (Pravachol® Tablet 40 mg) to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Inter [NCT01254461]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Use of High Potency Statins and Rates of Admission for Acute Kidney Injury: Multicenter, Retrospective Observational Analysis of Administrative Databases [NCT02518516]2,067,639 participants (Actual)Observational2011-01-31Completed
Pravastatin Intervention to Delay Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence [NCT03219372]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-27Terminated(stopped due to Study discontinued due to low accrual.)
An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Children and Adolescents With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia [NCT03510715]Phase 318 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-31Completed
A Phase 1, Single-center, Open-label, Sequential Study to Evaluate the Drug-drug Interaction Potential of BMS-986196 in Healthy Participants [NCT05852769]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-05-31Completed
A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Comparing Pitavastatin 4 mg vs. Pravastatin 40 mg in HIV-Infected Subjects With Dyslipidemia, Followed by a 40-Week Safety Extension Study [NCT01301066]Phase 4252 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
A 6 Week Open Label, Dose Comparison Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Rosuvastatin Versus Atorvastatin, Pravastatin, and Simvastatin in Subjects With Hypercholesterolemia. [NCT00654537]Phase 35,625 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-labeled, Parallel Group Comparison Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Ezetimibe Added to Ongoing Statin Therapy Versus Doubling the Dose of Ongoing Statin in the Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia. [NCT00652327]Phase 483 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
Coadministration of Ezetimibe With Fenofibrate Versus Pravastatin Monotherapy for the Treatment of Hyperlipidaemia in HIV-infected Patients Receiving Protease Inhibitors: a Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Pilot Study. [NCT00843661]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-03-31Recruiting
A Relative Bioavailability Study of Pravastatin Sodium 40 mg Tablets Under Fasting Conditions [NCT00834379]Phase 158 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-09-30Completed
A Relative Bioavailability Food Challenge Study of Pravastatin Sodium 40 mg Tablets [NCT00834847]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-08-31Completed
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pravastatin/Fenofibrate Complex in Patients With Combined Dyslipidemia With Adequately Controlled LDL-C But Inadequately Controlled Triglyceride Level by Atorvastatin Monotherapy [NCT02166593]Phase 3302 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
A Relative Bioavailability Study of 80 mg Pravastatin Sodium Tablets Under Non-Fasting Conditions [NCT00829309]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Multi-Center, Prospective, Longitudinal, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Daily Administration of Pravastatin 40 mg or Fenofibrate 160 mg or Pravafen (the Combination of Pravastatin and Fenofibrate 40/160 [NCT00459745]Phase 3481 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Higher Potency Statins and the Risk of New Diabetes: Multicentre, Observational Study of Administrative Databases [NCT02518503]136,966 participants (Actual)Observational2012-07-31Completed
A Comparative Study of Pravastatin vs Placebo as Primary Prevention of Severe Subcutaneous Breast Fibrosis in Hyper-radiosensitive Identified Patients With Breast Cancer [NCT04385433]Phase 315 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-04Terminated(stopped due to Not enough patients enrolled)
Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Pravastatin on Survival and Recurrence of Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer [NCT01038154]Phase 4146 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-11-30Recruiting
A Stable-isotope Study in Healthy Normolipidemic Volunteers Comparing the Mechanisms of Action of Lifibrol and Pravastatin [NCT01057654]Phase 318 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-01-31Completed
The Effects of Pravastatin and Rosuvastatin on the Tissue Characteristics and Morphology of Coronary Plaques in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris [NCT01325818]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-03-31Recruiting
[NCT01011127]0 participants Observational2009-12-31Completed
Pravastatin for Acute Myocardial Infarction With Minimally to Mildly Increased Levels of Serum Cholesterol Study That Evaluates the Effects of Pravastatin for Acute Myocardial Infarction With LDL-Cholesterol Levels of 70-129 mg/dl [NCT00688922]Phase 4400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-07-31Recruiting
The Influence of Raltegravir on Pravastatin Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Volunteers (GRAPPA) [NCT00665717]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Effect of GDC-0810 on the Pharmacokinetics of Pravastatin in Healthy Female Subjects of Non-Childbearing Potential [NCT02621957]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Quality of Life and Metabolic Alterations in Patients With Statin-Associated Myopathy [NCT00850460]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Investigator left institution and no PI has been found to continue the study)
A Prospective, Randomized, Two Group Comparison Study to Evaluate the Effect of Statin on Heart Function in Patients With Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure. [NCT00701285]Phase 470 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
A Two-Way Crossover, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Fasting, Bioequivalence Study of Pravastatin Sodium 80 mg Tablets Versus Pravachol® 80 mg Tablets In Normal Healthy Non-Smoking Male and Female Subjects [NCT00650221]Phase 143 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Treatment of the Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome With a Combination of Pravastatin and Zoledronic Acid [NCT00731016]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Vytorin on Carotid Intima-media Thickness and Overall Rigidity [NCT00738296]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Yokohama Assessment of Fluvastatin, Pravastatin, Pitavastatin and Atorvastatin in Acute Coronary Syndrome (Yokohama-ACS) [NCT00549926]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Efficacy of WelChol as an Add-on to Pravastatin Therapy [NCT00755352]Phase 467 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
European Society of Hypertension and Chinese Hypertension League Stroke in Hypertension Optimal Treatment Trial [NCT01563731]Phase 4200 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
An Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy of Switching to a Combination Tablet Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10mg/40mg, Compared to Doubling the Dose of Statin in Patients Hospitalized With a Coronary Event [NCT00132717]Phase 3450 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-01Completed
High Intensity Lipid Lowering Following Acute Coronary Syndromes for Persons Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HILLCLIMBER) [NCT02841774]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-30Completed
An Open-label Exploratory Study of the Pharmacokinetic Interaction of CXA-10 Administered to Steady State With Pravastatin and Vytorin® (Simvastatin and Ezetimibe) in Healthy Males [NCT02547402]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Fenofibrate Versus Pravastatin in HIV-Infected Subjects With Lipid Abnormalities [NCT00006412]Phase 3630 participants InterventionalCompleted
The Effect of Efavirenz and Nelfinavir on the Pharmacokinetics of Hydroxymethylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase Inhibitors [NCT00017758]Phase 156 participants InterventionalCompleted
Randomized Phase III Trial Sorafenib-Pravastatin Versus Sorafenib Alone for the Palliative Treatment of Child-Pugh A Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT01075555]Phase 3323 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
[NCT00546559]0 participants Observational2004-01-31Completed
[NCT01004237]Phase 452 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Secondary Prevention With HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor Against Stroke [NCT00221104]Phase 31,578 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-01Completed
Pilot Study of a Multi-Drug Regimen for Severe Pulmonary Fibrosis in Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome [NCT00467831]Phase 1/Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Terminated(stopped due to insufficient enrollment)
Effect of Statin Therapy on Disease Progression in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease [NCT00456365]Phase 3110 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
[NCT01903694]Phase 3474 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Evaluation Of The Effect Of PF-05089771 On The Metabolism Of Multiple Cytochrome P450 And OATP1B1 Transporter Substrates [NCT01934569]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
An 18-week, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 3b, Double-blind, Crossover Study, Followed by an 18-week Open-Label Period to Evaluate the Efficacy & Safety of the Lipid-Regulating Agents, Rosuvastatin & Pravastatin in the Treatment of Subjects With Dysbetali [NCT00214604]Phase 330 participants Interventional2005-02-28Completed
The Role of Androgen Deprivation Therapy In Cardiovascular Disease - A Longitudinal Prostate Cancer Study (RADICAL PC1) & A RAndomizeD Intervention for Cardiovascular and Lifestyle Risk Factors in Prostate Cancer Patients (RADICAL PC2) [NCT03127631]6,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-21Recruiting
Cyclosporine Modulation of Drug Resistance in Combination With Pravastatin, Mitoxantrone, and Etoposide for Adult Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): A Phase 1/2 Study [NCT01342887]Phase 1/Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Terminated
Pravastatin Therapy in Patients With Active Crohn's Disease: A Pilot Study [NCT00599625]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-10-31Recruiting
Aggressive Treatment of Metabolic Syndrome in Patients Treated With Clozapine for Schizophrenia [NCT00794963]8 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Difficulty recruiting)
Naturopathic Treatment for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00718796]Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A 4-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of JTT-705 (300 mg or 600 mg) Versus Placebo in Combination With Pravastatin 40 mg in Patients With Type II Hyperlipidemia [NCT00688896]Phase 2155 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
Effect of Pravastatin in the Subjects With Prediabetes or Early Diabetes [NCT02754739]Phase 444 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-15Completed
A Two-Way Crossover, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Fed, Bioequivalence Study of Pravastatin Sodium 80 mg Tablets Versus Pravachol® 80 mg Tablets In Normal Healthy Non-Smoking Male and Female Subjects [NCT00648544]Phase 144 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
Pravastatin for the Prevention of Preeclampsia in High-Risk Women: A Phase I Pilot Study [NCT01717586]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Active, not recruiting
Statin Therapy in Patients With Early Stage ADPKD [NCT03273413]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-31Active, not recruiting
Statins and Noncardiovascular Endpoints [NCT00330980]Phase 41,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2000-04-30Completed
Phase-II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib Plus Pravastatin Against Sorafenib Plus Placebo in Patients With Advanced Hepatocarcinoma [NCT01418729]Phase 2216 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Effects of GSK3640254 on the Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Probe Substrates (Caffeine, Metoprolol, Montelukast, Flurbiprofen, Omeprazole, Midazolam, Digoxin, and Pravastatin) in Healthy Subjects [NCT04425902]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-16Completed
The Effect of Pravastatin on the Incidence and in the Natural Course of Ventilatory Associated Pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit Patients [NCT00702130]Early Phase 1152 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Pravastatin in Relapsing-remitting MS: a Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study [NCT00200655]Phase 340 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
[NCT01856374]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
[NCT01857843]Phase 4160 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
[NCT01857921]290 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Pravastatin in HIV-Infected Patients Treated With Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy [NCT00221754]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
[NCT01872845]671 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-12Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Pravastatin to Prevent Preeclampsia in High Risk Women [NCT03944512]Phase 31,550 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-17Active, not recruiting
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Reduction With Statins in Hypertensives Patients. [NCT00738972]Phase 312 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated early due to sample size, not possible to perform further statistical analysis.)
A Single-dose Pilot Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Pravastatin Given as an Oral Dose in Pediatric and Adolescent Subjects 12 Months to 16 Years of Age Receiving Continuous Cycling Peritoneal Dialysis [NCT00571194]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Terminated
A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, ACTIVE CONTROLLED, PARALLEL GROUP STUDY OF PITAVASTATIN 4 MG VS. PRAVASTATIN 40 MG IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY HYPERLIPIDEMIA OR MIXED DYSLIPIDEMIA [NCT01256476]Phase 4328 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
Statin Recapture Therapy Before Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting [NCT01715714]Phase 42,630 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-07Completed
Red Yeast Rice vs. Pravastatin: A Double-Blind Randomized Comparative Study of Myopathic Symptoms [NCT00639223]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
An Interventional Trial in Established Chronic Renal Allograft Rejection [NCT00005010]Phase 30 participants InterventionalCompleted
Effect of an Oxidative-Stress-Reducing Strategy Consisting of Pravastatin, Vitamin E and Homocysteine-Lowering on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease [NCT00384618]Phase 4100 participants Interventional2001-05-31Terminated
Effect of Pravastatin on Erythrocyte Membrane Fatty Acid Contents in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease [NCT02992548]Phase 462 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
The Reduction Effect of Oral Pravastatin on Acute Phase Response of Intravenous Zoledronic Acid: a Real-world Study [NCT04719481]Phase 4110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-30Not yet recruiting
A Phase I Trial Evaluating the Effect of the Addition of HMGCoA-Reductase Inhibition With Pravastatin to Salvage Chemotherapy Idarubicin-HDAC in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia [NCT00107523]Phase 10 participants Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Do HMG CoA Reductase Inhibitors Affect Abeta Levels? [NCT00303277]Phase 435 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-08-31Completed
A Multicentre Phase III Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial of Pravastatin Added to First-Line Standard Chemotherapy in Patients With Small Lung Cancer [NCT00433498]Phase 3846 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
The Effect of Statins on the Urinary Proteome [NCT00464503]7 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Randomised Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin and Pravastatin in Dyslipidemic Patients Treated With Antiretroviral Agents. Anrs 126 [NCT00117494]Phase 486 participants Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Effects of Atorvastatin Versus Pravastatin on Platelet Inhibition by Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [NCT00405717]Phase 41,300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Effects of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) Versus Statin Therapy on Endothelial Function and Markers of Inflammation/Coagulation In HIV-Infected Individuals With High CD4 Cell Counts [NCT01515813]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to On 05/08/12, team working on revising protocol and re-open study under version 2.0)
[NCT00000461]Phase 20 participants Interventional1986-12-31Completed
[NCT00000539]Phase 30 participants Interventional1992-09-30Completed
Evaluation of Potential Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Protease Inhibitors and Lipid Lowering Agents [NCT00000941]Phase 156 participants InterventionalCompleted
Pilot Study to Evaluate the Tolerability of Velcade (Bortezomib) and Pravastatin for the Treatment of Relapsed Leukemia Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children [NCT02484261]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Contractual/Funding/Accrual)
Endothelial Dysfunction as a Risk Factor in HIV Study [NCT00039663]Phase 175 participants Interventional2002-05-31Completed
Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese(MEGA Study) [NCT00211705]Phase 48,000 participants Interventional1994-02-28Completed
Effects of Combined Ventricular Unloading and Pharmacological Therapy on Left Ventricular Metabolic Dysfunction in Heart Failure [NCT00402376]Phase 420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-04-30Terminated
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Strategies for the Prevention of Accelerated Atherosclerosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - A Pilot Study [NCT00054938]Phase 2150 participants Interventional2003-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Trial of Adjunctive Treatment With Pravastatin in Partially Remitted Patients With Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder [NCT00177580]Phase 472 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
A Randomised, Double-Blind Study of Pravastatin for the Treatment of Hyperlipidaemia in Patients With HIV [NCT00227500]Phase 440 participants Interventional2001-07-31Completed
Effect of Statin Use on Aldosterone Secretion [NCT02871687]Phase 1103 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
A Phase 1, Three-Part, Open-label Study in Healthy Adult Volunteers to Assess Vadadustat as a Perpetrator in Drug-Drug Interactions With Rosuvastatin, Sulfasalazine, Pravastatin, Atorvastatin and Simvastatin [NCT03801733]Phase 1134 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-17Completed
Study Of Pitavastatin 1 Mg Vs. Pravastatin 10 Mg, Pitavastatin 2 Mg Vs. Pravastatin 20 Mg And Pitavastatin 4 Mg Vs. Pravastatin 40 Mg (Following Up-Titration) In Elderly Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia Or Combined Dyslipidemia [NCT00257686]Phase 3962 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Incident Type II Diabetes Mellitus Among Patients Exposed to the Combination of Pravastatin and Paroxetine [NCT01602913]1 participants (Actual)Observational2011-12-31Completed
Cardiovascular Risk Markers Before and After Therapy With Statins in Patients With History of Kawasaki Disease [NCT00305201]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Withdrawn due to lack of study participants)
The Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Pravastatin and Cyclosporine in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01497483]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
[NCT01502904]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
A Multicenter, Prospective, Non-interventional Observational Study to Investigate the Change in Blood Cholesterol With Mevalotin® Tablet Administration in Korean Menopausal Women Aged 50 Years or More Who Require Treatment of Dyslipidemia [NCT05120895]2,467 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-08-10Recruiting
Open Label Study for the Functional Characterization of Drug Metabolism and Transport [NCT01788254]Phase 1144 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
The Influence of Statins on Glucose Homeostasis and the Biomarkers of Diabetes in Subjects With Impaired Fasting Glucose [NCT01816997]Phase 4160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-01-31Recruiting
Open Label Repeated Dose Study for the Evaluation of Heritability of and Genetic Influences on Drug Pharmacokinetics (TWINS II) [NCT01845194]Phase 1117 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
Assessment of the Efficacy of Lipid-lowering Agents to Limit Lipid Oxidation and Activation of the Clotting System in Patients With the Nephrotic Syndrome: a Pilot Study. [NCT01845428]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Effects of BMS-986142 on the Single-dose Pharmacokinetics of Methotrexate and Probe Substrates Montelukast (CYP2C8), Flurbiprofen (CYP2C9), Midazolam (CYP3A4), Digoxin (P-gp), and Pravastatin (OATP1B1) in Healthy Subjects [NCT02456844]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Idarubicin, Cytarabine and Pravastatin (IAP) for Induction of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT01831232]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Determining Cardiovascular Health Using a Multi-Analyte Profile in a Longitudinal Study of a Statin Intervention for Dyslipidemia [NCT01441908]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-06-30Active, not recruiting
Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction for Persons With HIV Infection: a Polypill Pilot Study [NCT00982189]37 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Pharmacodynamics, Preliminary Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability After Multiple Oral Doses of 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg and 1 mg o.d. BIBB 1464 (Tablet) or Pravastatin 20 mg Over 2 Weeks in Hyperlipemic Healthy Male Subjects (Parallel Group Comparison, Randomized, P [NCT02229773]Phase 1100 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-01-31Completed
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus Pravastatin 40 mg and Atorvastatin 10 mg in Subjects With Type IIa and IIb Hypercholesterolaemia [NCT00631189]Phase 4668 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
AuTophagy Activation for Cardiomyopathy Due to Anthracycline tReatment (ATACAR) Trial [NCT04190433]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Administratively closed due to low/no accrual)
Effects of High-dose Statin Treatments on Patients With Aspirin Mono Antiplatelet Therapy 12-months After Drug-eluting Stents Implantation: a Randomized Controlled Study [NCT01557075]Phase 42,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-07-31Recruiting
HDL Increased Plaque Stabilization in the Elderly [NCT00127218]Phase 3145 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
[NCT00000542]Phase 30 participants Interventional1993-08-31Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study Comparing the Effects of Atorvastatin Versus Pravastatin on the Progression and Quantification of Coronary Atherosclerotic Lesions as Measured by Intravascular Ultrasound (REVERSAL) [NCT00380939]Phase 4600 participants Interventional1999-04-30Completed
Statin Adjunctive Therapy for TB (StAT- TB) [NCT03456102]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-03-09Completed
Pharmacokinetics of Pravastatin and Simvastatin in Pediatric Dyslipidemia Patients: Clinical Impact of Genetic Variation in Statin Disposition [NCT02360826]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-17Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Multiple-dose, Parallel Study to Investigate The Effect of Cilostazol on the Disposition of Simvastatin in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT02431013]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-04-30Recruiting
An Open Label Phase II Trial of Zoledronic Acid, Pravastatin, and Lonafarnib for Patients With Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome(HGPS) and Progeroid Laminopathies [NCT00916747]Phase 285 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Active, not recruiting
[NCT00005117]0 participants InterventionalActive, not recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind Study of the Effect of RO4607381 in Combination With Pravastatin on HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) Levels in Patients With Low or Average HDL-C Levels [NCT00697203]Phase 2292 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Phase 4 Study of the Effects of Pravastatin on Cholesterol Levels, Inflammation and Cognition in Schizophrenia [NCT01082588]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Effect of Statins on Oxidative Stress and Endothelial Progenitor Cells: Comparison of Atorvastatin With Pravastatin [NCT00166036]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
A Phase 2 Efficacy and Safety Dose-Ranging Study of LY3015014 in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia [NCT01890967]Phase 2527 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Effect of Evacetrapib on the Pharmacokinetics of Pravastatin in Healthy Japanese and Non-Japanese Subjects [NCT01958489]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
A Phase II Pilot Study of Zoledronic Acid, Pravastatin, and Lonafarnib (SCH66336) for Patients With Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome (HGPS) and Progeroid Laminopathies [NCT00879034]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
A Multi-center, Prospective Observational Study to Investigate the Effectiveness of Pravastatin on Renal Function in Korean Dyslipidemic Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT05107063]2,972 participants (Actual)Observational2016-01-20Completed
Genetic Predictors of Pharmacokinetic Variability in the Drug-drug Interaction Between Darunavir/Ritonavir and Pravastatin: the Role of SLCO1B1 Polymorphisms. [NCT00630734]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Dapagliflozin Effect in Cognitive Impairment in Stroke Trial [NCT05565976]Phase 2/Phase 3270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-01Recruiting
Pilot Trial of Pravastatin as a Novel Prophylactic Medicine to Reduce Endothelial Injury in Pediatric Patients With Elevated Body Mass Index [NCT05524246]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-27Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Prescription Omega-3 Fatty Acid Added to Stable Statin Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertriglyceridemia [NCT02305355]Phase 468 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Impact of Metformin and Polysorbate 80 on Drug Absorption and Disposition [NCT04640571]Phase 418 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-01Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Forced-Titration Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of 145 mg Fenofibrate and 20 or 40 mg Simvastatin With 40 mg Pravastatin Monotherapy in Patients With Mixed Dyslipidemia at Risk of Cardi [NCT00362206]Phase 3423 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00127218 (2) [back to overview]Multiple Combined Events ( Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events as Well as Myocardial Revascularization)
NCT00127218 (2) [back to overview]Changes in Plaque Architecture and Composition Directly Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Aorta and Carotid Arteries
NCT00166036 (2) [back to overview]Change in Plasma Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substance (TBARS) Levels
NCT00166036 (2) [back to overview]Change in Flow-mediated Dilatation (FMD)
NCT00221104 (5) [back to overview]Incidence Rate of Stroke and TIA
NCT00221104 (5) [back to overview]Incidence Rate of Lacunar Infarction
NCT00221104 (5) [back to overview]Incidence Rate of Intracranial Hemorrhage
NCT00221104 (5) [back to overview]Incidence Rate of Atherothrombotic Infarction
NCT00221104 (5) [back to overview]Incidence Rate of Cardioembolic Infarction
NCT00257686 (2) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in TC
NCT00257686 (2) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C
NCT00456365 (4) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Demonstrating 20% or More Increase in Total Kidney Volume
NCT00456365 (4) [back to overview]Urinary Albumin Excretion
NCT00456365 (4) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Total Kidney Volume Corrected for Height
NCT00456365 (4) [back to overview]Left Ventricular Mass Index
NCT00467831 (1) [back to overview]Survival at 2 Years
NCT00630734 (10) [back to overview]Darunavir Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
NCT00630734 (10) [back to overview]Ritonavir Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Over the Dosing Interval
NCT00630734 (10) [back to overview]Relative Change in Pravastatin Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
NCT00630734 (10) [back to overview]Relative Change in Pravastatin Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Over the Dosing Interval
NCT00630734 (10) [back to overview]Pravastatin Alone: Pravastatin Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
NCT00630734 (10) [back to overview]Pravastatin Alone: Pravastatin Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Over the Dosing Interval
NCT00630734 (10) [back to overview]Darunavir Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Over the Dosing Interval
NCT00630734 (10) [back to overview]Pravastatin + Darunavir/Ritonavir: Pravastatin Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Over the Dosing Interval
NCT00630734 (10) [back to overview]Pravastatin + Darunavir/Ritonavir: Pravastatin Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
NCT00630734 (10) [back to overview]Ritonavir Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
NCT00631189 (9) [back to overview]Compare the Percentage of Variation From Baseline Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A1 Ratio and After 8 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00631189 (9) [back to overview]To Evaluate Clinical and Laboratory Safety
NCT00631189 (9) [back to overview]Compare the Percentage of Total Cholesterol Variation From Baseline and After 8 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00631189 (9) [back to overview]Compare the Percentage of HDL-C (High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol) Variation From Baseline and After 8 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00631189 (9) [back to overview]Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Level After 8 Weeks
NCT00631189 (9) [back to overview]Compare the Numbers of Patients Achieving the LDL-C Goal According to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP) ATP III) Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemic Patients
NCT00631189 (9) [back to overview]Compare the Percentage of Variation of Phospholipase A2 (PLA2)
NCT00631189 (9) [back to overview]Compare the Percentage of Variation of C-reactive Protein (CRP)
NCT00631189 (9) [back to overview]Compare the Percentage of Variation From Baseline Triglycerides Values and After 8 Weeks
NCT00639223 (2) [back to overview]Withdrawal of Therapy Due to Muscle Symptoms That Are Either Intolerable and/or Associated With a Creatine Kinase(CK) >500
NCT00639223 (2) [back to overview]Change in LDL-Cholesterol Measured at the Beginning and End of the Study
NCT00652327 (1) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline at Study Endpoint, After 8 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00697203 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change of Fasting Glucose Level
NCT00697203 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in: Total Cholesterol, Triglycerides, HDL-C, LDL-C, HDL-2, HDL-3, ApoA1, ApoA2, ApoB, LpAI
NCT00697203 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C Level\
NCT00697203 (5) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in HDL-C Level\
NCT00697203 (5) [back to overview]Ratios of Total HDL-C/LDL-C, HDL-2/HDL-3, ApoA1/ApoB
NCT00794963 (1) [back to overview]Change in Weight
NCT00829309 (3) [back to overview]AUC0-t - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Non-zero Concentration (Per Participant)
NCT00829309 (3) [back to overview]Cmax - Maximum Observed Concentration - Pravastatin in Plasma
NCT00829309 (3) [back to overview]AUC0-inf - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (Extrapolated)
NCT00830258 (3) [back to overview]AUC0-t - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Non-zero Concentration (Per Participant)
NCT00830258 (3) [back to overview]Cmax - Maximum Observed Concentration - Pravastatin in Plasma
NCT00830258 (3) [back to overview]AUC0-inf - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (Extrapolated)
NCT00840177 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00840177 (4) [back to overview]Relapse-free Survival (RFS)
NCT00840177 (4) [back to overview]Frequency and Severity of Toxicity as Assessed by NCI CTCAE Version 3.0
NCT00840177 (4) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR) Rate (Including CR With Incomplete Recovery)
NCT00850460 (2) [back to overview]Individualized Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mean Scores (Physical Component) From Week 0 to Week 8
NCT00850460 (2) [back to overview]Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life (INQoL) Mean Scores From Week 0 to Week 8
NCT00879034 (4) [back to overview]The Primary Objective of This Study is to Evaluate the Feasibility of Administering Intravenous Zoledronic Acid, Oral Pravastatin and Oral Lonafarnib, to Patients With Progeria for a Minimum of 4 Weeks
NCT00879034 (4) [back to overview]To Investigate Which Clinical and Laboratory Studies Are Needed to Monitor or Alter Therapy to Prevent Unacceptable Toxicity
NCT00879034 (4) [back to overview]To Describe Any Acute and Chronic Toxicities Associated With Treating Progeria Patients With the Combination of Zoledronic Acid, Pravastatin and Lonafarnib
NCT00879034 (4) [back to overview]To Obtain Baseline Clinical and Laboratory Data so That Longer-term Measures of Efficacy Will be Achievable if Treatment Continues Beyond the 4-week Feasibility Study Period.
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Month 4 in the Framingham Risk Score (FRS)
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Changes hsCRP (C-reactive Protein)
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Changes IL-6 (Interleukin-6)
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Changes in Small Artery Elasticity
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Changes TNFa (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha)
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Stated (by Self-report) That They Had Side Effects
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Took >90% of Their Doses (by Pill Count)
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Changes in Blood Lipids
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Changes in Blood Pressure
NCT01082588 (7) [back to overview]Change in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) From Baseline to Week 12
NCT01082588 (7) [back to overview]Change in LDL-cholesterol Between Baseline and Week 12
NCT01082588 (7) [back to overview]Change in MATRICS Neuropsychological Battery Composite Score From Baseline to Week 12
NCT01082588 (7) [back to overview]Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) General Score From Baseline to Week 12
NCT01082588 (7) [back to overview]Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Negative Score From Baseline to Week 12
NCT01082588 (7) [back to overview]Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Positive Score From Baseline to Week 12
NCT01082588 (7) [back to overview]Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score From Baseline to Week 12
NCT01256476 (1) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol(LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 12
NCT01301066 (1) [back to overview]Change of Fasting Serum Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at 12 Weeks
NCT01342887 (1) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Doses Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride and Etoposide When Combined With Cyclosporine and Pravastatin Sodium
NCT01831232 (6) [back to overview]Number of Biomarker-positive Participants With Clinical Responses
NCT01831232 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Good Complete Remission (CR)
NCT01831232 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TRM.
NCT01831232 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01831232 (6) [back to overview]Rate of Complete Remission (CR), Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi) and Partial Remission (PR)
NCT01831232 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Injection Site Reaction
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP)
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve at Steady-State (AUC,ss) for LY3015014
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1), Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in LDL-C, Total Cholesterol (TC), High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Triglycerides (TG), Non-HDL-C
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Free Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Antibody (PCSK9) Levels
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Antibody (PCSK9) Levels
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Develop Treatment Emergent Anti-LY3015014 Antibodies
NCT01958489 (3) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Pravastatin
NCT01958489 (3) [back to overview]PK: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity [AUC(0-∞)] of Pravastatin
NCT01958489 (3) [back to overview]PK: Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Pravastatin
NCT02841774 (2) [back to overview]Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
NCT02841774 (2) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Fasting LDL-cholesterol
NCT03456102 (1) [back to overview]Safety of Escalating Doses of Pravastatin as Assessed by Number of Adverse Events
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein a (Lp) (a) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Weeks 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48 - ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting >=15 Percent (%) Reduction in LDL-C Level at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C Level at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Tanner Staging at Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 48
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides (TG) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides (TG) at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides (TG) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol < 110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Tanner Staging at Baseline and Weeks 24, 68 and 104
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Weeks 8, 12 and 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 30 Percent (%) Reduction in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol < 130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50% Reduction in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50% Reduction in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieved at Least 30% Reduction in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Weeks 8, 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Weeks 12, and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Positive Anti-Alirocumab Antibodies (ADA) Response
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Positive Anti-Alirocumab Antibodies (ADA) Response
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Absolute Change From Baseline in Apo B/Apo A-1 Ratio at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Absolute Change From Baseline in Apo B/Apo A-1 Ratio at Weeks 12 and 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cogstate Battery Test - Overall Composite Score at Weeks 24, 68 and 104
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]OL Period: Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 104: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]OL Period: Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 104: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level Lower Than (<) 130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level <130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03882177 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Permanently Discontinue Assigned Study Regimen for Any Reason
NCT03882177 (2) [back to overview]Frequency of Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Cmax for Montelukast
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Cmax for Omeprazole
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Cmax for Pravastatin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Caffeine
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Ratio of AUC(0-infinity) of 1-hydroxymidazolam to Midazolam
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Ratio of AUC(0-infinity) of 36-hydroxymontelukast to Montelukast
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Ratio of AUC(0-infinity) of 5-hydroxyomeprazole to Omeprazole
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Ratio of AUC(0-infinity) of Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol to Metoprolol
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Ratio of Cmax of 1-hydroxymidazolam to Midazolam
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Ratio of Cmax of 36-hydroxymontelukast to Montelukast
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Hematocrit
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Oral Temperature
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: AUC From Time Zero to the End of the Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUC[0-tau]) for GSK3640254
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: AUC(0-t) for GSK3640254
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Cmax for GSK3640254
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Plasma Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval (Ctau) for GSK3640254
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: t1/2 for GSK3640254
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Tmax for GSK3640254
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Absolute Values for Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Absolute Values of Albumin, Globulin, Protein
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Absolute Values of Amylase, Lipase
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Absolute Values of Creatine Kinase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Gamma-glutamyl Transferase
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Absolute Values of Glucose, Carbon Dioxide, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Anion Gap, Calcium, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Urea
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Absolute Values of Hematocrit
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Absolute Values of Hemoglobin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Absolute Values of Oral Temperature
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Absolute Values of Platelet Count, Leukocyte Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils, Basophils
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Absolute Values of Pulse Rate
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Absolute Values of Respiratory Rate
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Absolute Values of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Absolute Values of Urate, Creatinine, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Albumin, Globulin, Protein
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Amylase, Lipase
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Creatine Kinase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, ALT, ALP, AST, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcF
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Glucose, Carbon Dioxide, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Anion Gap, Calcium, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Urea
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Platelet Count, Leukocyte Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils, Basophils
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Urate, Creatinine, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Absolute Values for ECG Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcF Interval
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Absolute Values of Albumin, Globulin, Protein
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Absolute Values of Amylase, Lipase
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Absolute Values of Creatine Kinase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, ALT, ALP, AST, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Absolute Values of Glucose, Carbon Dioxide, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Anion Gap, Calcium, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Urea
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Absolute Values of Hematocrit
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Absolute Values of Hemoglobin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Absolute Values of Oral Temperature
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Absolute Values of Platelet Count, Leukocyte Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils, Basophils
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Absolute Values of Pulse Rate
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Absolute Values of Respiratory Rate
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Absolute Values of SBP and DBP
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Absolute Values of Urate, Creatinine, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Albumin, Globulin, Protein
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Amylase, Lipase
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Creatine Kinase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, ALT, ALP, AST, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcF
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Glucose, Carbon Dioxide, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Anion Gap, Calcium, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Urea
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Platelet Count, Leukocyte Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils, Basophils
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Urate, Creatinine, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Absolute Values for ECG Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcF Interval
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Absolute Values of Albumin, Globulin, Protein
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Absolute Values of Amylase, Lipase
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Absolute Values of Creatine Kinase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, ALT, ALP, AST, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Absolute Values of Glucose, Carbon Dioxide, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Anion Gap, Calcium, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Urea
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Absolute Values of Hematocrit
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Absolute Values of Hemoglobin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Absolute Values of Oral Temperature
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Absolute Values of Platelet Count, Leukocyte Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils, Basophils
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Absolute Values of Pulse Rate
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Absolute Values of Respiratory Rate
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Absolute Values of SBP and DBP
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Absolute Values of Urate, Creatinine, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Albumin, Globulin, Protein
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Amylase, Lipase
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Creatine Kinase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, ALT, ALP, AST, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcF
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Oral Temperature
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Glucose, Carbon Dioxide, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Anion Gap, Calcium, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Urea
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Hematocrit
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Oral Temperature
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Platelet Count, Leukocyte Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils, Basophils
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Urate, Creatinine, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Apparent Terminal Phase Half-life (t1/2) for Caffeine
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to Time t (AUC[0-t]) for Caffeine
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC[0-infinity]) for Caffeine
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-infinity) for 1-hydroxymidazolam
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-infinity) for 36-hydroxymontelukast
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-infinity) for 5-hydroxyomeprazole
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-infinity) for Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-infinity) for Digoxin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-infinity) for Flurbiprofen
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Tmax for Pravastatin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Tmax for Omeprazole
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Tmax for Montelukast
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Tmax for Midazolam
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Tmax for Metoprolol
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Tmax for Flurbiprofen
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Tmax for Digoxin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Tmax for Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Tmax for 5-hydroxyomeprazole
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-infinity) for Metoprolol
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Tmax for 36-hydroxymontelukast
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Tmax for 1-hydroxymidazolam
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Time to Cmax (Tmax) for Caffeine
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]t1/2 for Pravastatin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]t1/2 for Omeprazole
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Hematocrit
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-infinity) for Midazolam
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-infinity) for Montelukast
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-infinity) for Omeprazole
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-infinity) for Pravastatin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-t) for 1-hydroxymidazolam
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-t) for 36-hydroxymontelukast
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]t1/2 for Montelukast
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]t1/2 for Midazolam
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-t) for 5-hydroxyomeprazole
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-t) for Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-t) for Digoxin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-t) for Flurbiprofen
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-t) for Metoprolol
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-t) for Midazolam
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-t) for Montelukast
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-t) for Omeprazole
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]AUC(0-t) for Pravastatin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Cmax for 1-hydroxymidazolam
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Cmax for 36-hydroxymontelukast
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Cmax for 5-hydroxyomeprazole
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Cmax for Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Cmax for Digoxin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Cmax for Flurbiprofen
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Cmax for Metoprolol
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Cmax for Midazolam
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]t1/2 for Metoprolol
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]t1/2 for Flurbiprofen
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]t1/2 for Digoxin
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]t1/2 for Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]t1/2 for 5-hydroxyomeprazole
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]t1/2 for 36-hydroxymontelukast
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]t1/2 for 1-hydroxymidazolam
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Ratio of Cmax of Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol to Metoprolol
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Ratio of Cmax of 5-hydroxyomeprazole to Omeprazole
NCT04425902 (171) [back to overview]Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes
NCT04608344 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Severity Grade 3 or Above Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities
NCT04608344 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT04608344 (8) [back to overview]PK Parameter: Cmax of ATV, PRA, and ROS
NCT04608344 (8) [back to overview]PK Parameter: Cmax of ATV, PRA, and ROS
NCT04608344 (8) [back to overview]PK Parameter: AUCinf of ATV, PRA, and ROS
NCT04608344 (8) [back to overview]PK Parameter: AUCinf of ATV, PRA, and ROS
NCT04608344 (8) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: AUClast of ATV, PRA, and ROS
NCT04608344 (8) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: AUClast of ATV, PRA, and ROS

Multiple Combined Events ( Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events as Well as Myocardial Revascularization)

Cerebrovascular events (newly diagnosed) such as Stroke and Myocardial revascularization (specifically coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary interventions, carotid endarterectomy) were recorded (NCT00127218)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any Statin Plus Niacin6
Any Statin Plus Placebo2

[back to top]

Changes in Plaque Architecture and Composition Directly Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Aorta and Carotid Arteries

The primary endpoint is Changes in plaque architecture and composition directly measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the aorta and carotid arteries. (NCT00127218)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of internal carotid artery (Mean)
Niacin Plus Statin7
Placebo Plus Statin5

[back to top]

Change in Plasma Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substance (TBARS) Levels

Oxidative stress was assessed with plasma thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) levels (an index of lipid peroxidation).Oxidative stress reflects an imbalance between the systemic manifestation of reactive oxygen species and a biological system's ability to readily detoxify the reactive intermediates or to repair the resulting damage.We hypothesized that equipotent doses of these two statins will have divergent effects on markers of oxidative stress and endothelial function. (NCT00166036)
Timeframe: Baseline &12 Weeks

Interventionnmol/mL (Mean)
Atorvastatin 10 mg2.1
Pravastatin 80 mg2.5

[back to top]

Change in Flow-mediated Dilatation (FMD)

Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery was used to asses Endothelial Function. The endothelium, by releasing nitric oxide (NO), promotes vasodilation and inhibits inflammation, thrombosis, and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation.We hypothesized that equipotent doses of these two statins will have divergent effects on markers of oxidative stress and endothelial function. (NCT00166036)
Timeframe: Baseline & 12 Weeks

InterventionPercentage of brachial artery diameter (Mean)
Atorvastatin 10 mg5.9
Pravastatin 80 mg6.0

[back to top]

Incidence Rate of Stroke and TIA

Incidence rate of patients with recurrent stroke of any type or transient ischemic attack (TIA) (NCT00221104)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

Interventionevents /100 person-years (Number)
Pravastatin2.56
Control Group2.65

[back to top]

Incidence Rate of Lacunar Infarction

Incidence rate of patients with lacunar infarction (NCT00221104)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

Interventionevents /100 person years (Number)
Pravastatin1.26
Control Group1.01

[back to top]

Incidence Rate of Intracranial Hemorrhage

Incidence rate of patients with intracranial hemorrhage (NCT00221104)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

Interventionevents /100 person-years (Number)
Pravastatin0.29
Control Group0.31

[back to top]

Incidence Rate of Atherothrombotic Infarction

Incidence rate of patients with atherothrombotic infarction (NCT00221104)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

Interventionevents /100 person-years (Number)
Control Group0.65
Pravastatin0.21

[back to top]

Incidence Rate of Cardioembolic Infarction

Incidence rate of patients with cardioembolic infarction (NCT00221104)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

Interventionevents /100 person-years (Number)
Pravastatin0.18
Control Group0.08

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in TC

Percent change from baseline in total cholesterol (TC) (NCT00257686)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Pitavastatin 1 mg-22.19
Pravastatin 10 mg-15.34
Pitavastatin 2 mg-26.68
Pravastatin 20 mg-20.61
Pitavastatin 4 mg-30.75
Pravastatin 40 mg-24.07

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C

Percent change from baseline in low density cholesterol (LDL-C) (NCT00257686)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Pitavastatin 1 mg-31.43
Pravastatin 10 mg-22.41
Pitavastatin 2 mg-38.99
Pravastatin 20 mg-28.83
Pitavastatin 4 mg-44.31
Pravastatin 40 mg-33.98

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Demonstrating 20% or More Increase in Total Kidney Volume

Percent of participants demonstrating 20% or more increase in total kidney volume corrected for height, left ventricular mass index, or urinary albumin excretion over the three year study period (NCT00456365)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pravastatin69
Placebo88

[back to top]

Urinary Albumin Excretion

(NCT00456365)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionmcg/min (Mean)
Pravastatin29
Placebo49

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Total Kidney Volume Corrected for Height

(NCT00456365)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Pravastatin23
Placebo31

[back to top]

Left Ventricular Mass Index

left ventricular mass index in g/m^2 by MRI (NCT00456365)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventiong/m^2 (Mean)
Pravastatin60
Placebo58

[back to top]

Survival at 2 Years

The number of subjects surviving after 24 months on study. (NCT00467831)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Multi-Drug Regimen0

[back to top]

Darunavir Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

Cmax of darunavir over a 12-hour dosing interval (NCT00630734)
Timeframe: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 hours post-dose

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
SLCO1B1 Group 17770
SLCO1B1 Group 28047
SLCO1B1 Group 37789

[back to top]

Ritonavir Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Over the Dosing Interval

AUC of ritonavir over a 12-hour dosing interval. (NCT00630734)
Timeframe: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 hours post-dose

Interventionng*hr/ml (Mean)
SLCO1B1 Group 15239
SLCO1B1 Group 27178
SLCO1B1 Group 37907

[back to top]

Relative Change in Pravastatin Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

Cmax of pravastatin when administered with darunavir/ritonavir divided by the Cmax of pravastatin when administered alone. (NCT00630734)
Timeframe: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
SLCO1B1 Group 11.11
SLCO1B1 Group 21.69
SLCO1B1 Group 32.32

[back to top]

Relative Change in Pravastatin Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Over the Dosing Interval

AUC of pravastatin when administered with darunavir/ritonavir divided by AUC of pravastatin when administered alone. The AUC was measured over a 24-hour dosing interval. (NCT00630734)
Timeframe: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng*hr/ml (Mean)
SLCO1B1 Group 11.09
SLCO1B1 Group 21.59
SLCO1B1 Group 31.75

[back to top]

Pravastatin Alone: Pravastatin Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

(NCT00630734)
Timeframe: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
SLCO1B1 Group 127.7
SLCO1B1 Group 233.3
SLCO1B1 Group 346.2

[back to top]

Pravastatin Alone: Pravastatin Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Over the Dosing Interval

Dosing interval of 24 hours (NCT00630734)
Timeframe: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng*h/ml (Mean)
SLCO1B1 Group 163
SLCO1B1 Group 286.6
SLCO1B1 Group 3123.4

[back to top]

Darunavir Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Over the Dosing Interval

AUC of darunavir over a 12-hour dosing interval. (NCT00630734)
Timeframe: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 hours post-dose

Interventionng*h/ml (Mean)
SLCO1B1 Group 158552
SLCO1B1 Group 263679
SLCO1B1 Group 360156

[back to top]

Pravastatin + Darunavir/Ritonavir: Pravastatin Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Over the Dosing Interval

Dosing interval of 24 hours (NCT00630734)
Timeframe: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng*h/ml (Mean)
SLCO1B1 Group 168.4
SLCO1B1 Group 2106.8
SLCO1B1 Group 3145.7

[back to top]

Pravastatin + Darunavir/Ritonavir: Pravastatin Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

(NCT00630734)
Timeframe: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
SLCO1B1 Group 130.1
SLCO1B1 Group 242.4
SLCO1B1 Group 352.8

[back to top]

Ritonavir Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

Cmax of ritonavir over a 12-hour dosing interval (NCT00630734)
Timeframe: 0,1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 hours post-dose

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
SLCO1B1 Group 1844
SLCO1B1 Group 21143
SLCO1B1 Group 31279

[back to top]

Compare the Percentage of Variation From Baseline Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A1 Ratio and After 8 Weeks of Treatment

To Compare the percentage of variation from baseline Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A1 ratio and after 8 weeks of treatment. As the recruitment target was not reached at the date initially planned, and in view of the recruitment difficulties, AstraZeneca decided not to extend the patient recruitment period and to perform only a descriptive analysis of the data (NCT00631189)
Timeframe: baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercent. Apolipoprotein B/A1 decrease (Mean)
Atorvastatin-30.9
Pravastatin-26
Rosuvastatin-31.9

[back to top]

To Evaluate Clinical and Laboratory Safety

Serious Adverse Event and Adverse Event reported throughout the study (NCT00631189)
Timeframe: duration of study

InterventionAdverse Events (Number)
Initial Phase8
Atorvastatin9
Pravastatin8
Rosuvastatin5

[back to top]

Compare the Percentage of Total Cholesterol Variation From Baseline and After 8 Weeks of Treatment

To compare the percentage of total cholesterol variation taking baseline value as a reference. As the recruitment target was not reached at the date initially planned, and in view of the recruitment difficulties, AstraZeneca decided not to extend the patient recruitment period and to perform only a descriptive analysis of the data (NCT00631189)
Timeframe: from baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercentage of total cholesterol decrease (Mean)
Atorvastatin-28.6
Pravastatin-20.4
Rosuvastatin-25.2

[back to top]

Compare the Percentage of HDL-C (High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol) Variation From Baseline and After 8 Weeks of Treatment

Compare the percentage of HDL-C (High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol) variation taking baseline value as a reference and after 8 weeks of treatment. As the recruitment target was not reached at the date initially planned, and in view of the recruitment difficulties, AstraZeneca decided not to extend the patient recruitment period and to perform only a descriptive analysis of the data (NCT00631189)
Timeframe: After 8 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercentage of HDL-C increase (Mean)
Atorvastatin4.4
Pravastatin7.9
Rosuvastatin11.3

[back to top]

Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Level After 8 Weeks

To compare the percentages of LDL-C level variation. As the recruitment target was not reached at the date initially planned, and in view of the recruitment difficulties, AstraZeneca decided not to extend the patient recruitment period and to perform only a descriptive analysis of the data (NCT00631189)
Timeframe: Change from baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercentage of LDL-C decrease (Mean)
Atorvastatin-39.4
Pravastatin-30.3
Rosuvastatin-37.6

[back to top]

Compare the Numbers of Patients Achieving the LDL-C Goal According to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP) ATP III) Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemic Patients

To Compare numbers of patients achieving the LDL-C goal according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP). As the recruitment target was not reached at the date initially planned, and in view of the recruitment difficulties, AstraZeneca decided not to extend the patient recruitment period and to perform only a descriptive analysis of the data. The percentage of patients achieving the NCEP-ATP III LDL-C goal. ATP III is categorized into 3 risk categories:(1) established CHD and CHD risk equivalents(2) multiple risk factors(3) zero to one (0-1) risk factor (NCT00631189)
Timeframe: from baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Atorvastatin42
Pravastatin22
Rosuvastatin38

[back to top]

Compare the Percentage of Variation of Phospholipase A2 (PLA2)

To Compare the percentage of variation of phospholipase A2 (PLA2) taking baseline value as a reference. As the recruitment target was not reached at the date initially planned, and view of the recruitment difficulties, AstraZeneca decided not to extend the patient recruitment period and to perform only a descriptive analysis of the data (NCT00631189)
Timeframe: from baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercent of variation of phospholipase A2 (Mean)
Atorvastatin5.6
Pravastatin13
Rosuvastatin2.9

[back to top]

Compare the Percentage of Variation of C-reactive Protein (CRP)

To compare the percentage of variation of C-reactive protein (CRP) taking baseline values as reference. As the recruitment target was not reached at the date initially planned, and in view of the recruitment difficulties, AstraZeneca decided not to extend the patient recruitment period and to perform only a descriptive analysis of the data (NCT00631189)
Timeframe: baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercent of variation of C-reactive prot. (Mean)
Atorvastatin37.3
Pravastatin33.1
Rosuvastatin15.2

[back to top]

Compare the Percentage of Variation From Baseline Triglycerides Values and After 8 Weeks

To compare the percentage of variation from baseline triglycerides values and after 8 weeks. As the recruitment target was not reached at the date initially planned, and in view of the recruitment difficulties, AstraZeneca decided not to extend the patient recruitment period and to perform only a descriptive analysis of the data (NCT00631189)
Timeframe: Baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercentage of triglycerides decrease (Mean)
Atorvastatin-19.2
Pravastatin-6.1
Rosuvastatin-8.7

[back to top]

Withdrawal of Therapy Due to Muscle Symptoms That Are Either Intolerable and/or Associated With a Creatine Kinase(CK) >500

(NCT00639223)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Pravastatin2
Red Yeast Rice1

[back to top]

Change in LDL-Cholesterol Measured at the Beginning and End of the Study

(NCT00639223)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage Change (Mean)
Pravastatin-27.0
Red Yeast Rice-30.2

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline at Study Endpoint, After 8 Weeks of Treatment

(NCT00652327)
Timeframe: Assessed at the end of 8 weeks of treatment (from baseline to endpoint)

InterventionPercentage change (Mean)
Ezetimibe + Statin-26.56
Double Statin-9.7

[back to top]

Percent Change of Fasting Glucose Level

(NCT00697203)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionPercent change in mg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Dalcetrapib 300mg3.61
Dalcetrapib 600mg6.03
Dalcetrapib 900mg5.42
Placebo3.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in: Total Cholesterol, Triglycerides, HDL-C, LDL-C, HDL-2, HDL-3, ApoA1, ApoA2, ApoB, LpAI

(NCT00697203)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,,
InterventionPercent change in mg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Total CholesterolTriglyceridesHDL-CLDL-CHDL-2HDL-3ApoA1ApoA2ApoBLpA1
Dalcetrapib 300mg7.08-5.9517.188.5152.1011.957.033.822.6615.06
Dalcetrapib 600mg12.584.4531.4210.8897.4020.9413.608.074.6222.68
Dalcetrapib 900mg9.36-5.0136.455.28121.223.5614.908.36-1.6424.76
Placebo1.35-4.252.313.8410.540.681.010.72-0.713.32

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C Level\

(NCT00697203)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

InterventionPercent change in mg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Dalcetrapib 300mg6.58
Dalcetrapib 600mg11.90
Dalcetrapib 900mg13.92
Placebo0.73

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in HDL-C Level\

(NCT00697203)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Dalcetrapib 300mg17.18
Dalcetrapib 600mg31.42
Dalcetrapib 900mg36.45
Placebo2.31

[back to top]

Ratios of Total HDL-C/LDL-C, HDL-2/HDL-3, ApoA1/ApoB

(NCT00697203)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 12 Weeks

,,,
InterventionPercent Change in Ratio (Least Squares Mean)
HDL-C/LDL-CApoB/ApoA1HDL-2/HDL-3
Dalcetrapib 300mg-3.76-4.9735.18
Dalcetrapib 600mg-16.0-5.7963.40
Dalcetrapib 900mg-19.4-12.776.38
Placebo3.09-1.848.89

[back to top]

Change in Weight

(NCT00794963)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 months

Interventionpounds (Mean)
Integrated Care11

[back to top]

AUC0-t - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Non-zero Concentration (Per Participant)

Bioequivalence based on AUC0-t (NCT00829309)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over 16 hour period

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Pravastatin241.29
Pravachol®251.86

[back to top]

Cmax - Maximum Observed Concentration - Pravastatin in Plasma

Bioequivalence based on Cmax (NCT00829309)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over 16 hour period

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pravastatin126.69
Pravachol®130.64

[back to top]

AUC0-inf - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (Extrapolated)

Bioequivalence based on AUC0-inf (NCT00829309)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over 16 hour period

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Pravastatin273.32
Pravachol®299.56

[back to top]

AUC0-t - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Non-zero Concentration (Per Participant)

Bioequivalence based on AUC0-t (NCT00830258)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over 16 hour period

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Pravastatin404.202
Pravachol®373.720

[back to top]

Cmax - Maximum Observed Concentration - Pravastatin in Plasma

Bioequivalence based on Cmax (NCT00830258)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over 16 hour period

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pravastatin191.857
Pravachol®188.460

[back to top]

AUC0-inf - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (Extrapolated)

Bioequivalence based on AUC0-inf (NCT00830258)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over 16 hour period

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Pravastatin409.224
Pravachol®378.930

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is calculated for all participants from the date of initial registration on study until death from any cause. Observations for participants last known to be alive were censored. (NCT00840177)
Timeframe: OS assessed for up to 5 years, median OS reported

Interventionmonths (Median)
Initial Cohort: Relapsed AML With Previous Remission ≥ 3 Month10
Poor-risk Cohort: MDS Transformed to AML10
Poor-risk Cohort: Refractory/Relapsed AML, < 6 Mths Remission4

[back to top]

Relapse-free Survival (RFS)

"RFS is calculated for participants who have achieved a complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi). RFS will be measured from the date of CR or CRi until relapse from CR or CRi for death from any cause. Observation is censored at the date of last follow-up for patients last known to be alive without report of relapse.~Per the Revised Recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia, morphologic complete remission requires that the patient achieve the morphologic leukemia-free state and have an absolute neutrophil count of more than 1,000/μL and platelets of ≥ 100,000/μL." (NCT00840177)
Timeframe: RFS assessed for up to 5 years, median RFS reported

Interventionmonths (Median)
Initial Cohort: Relapsed AML With Previous Remission ≥ 3 Month9
Poor-risk Cohort: MDS Transformed to AML19.4
Poor-risk Cohort: Refractory/Relapsed AML, < 6 Mths Remission2.7

[back to top]

Frequency and Severity of Toxicity as Assessed by NCI CTCAE Version 3.0

Number of patients with Grade 3-5 adverse events that were possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug are reported by given type of adverse event (NCT00840177)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years post registration

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ALT, SGPT (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase)AST, SGOTAcidosis (metabolic or respiratory)Albumin, serum-low (hypoalbuminemia)Alkaline phosphataseAlkalosis (metabolic or respiratory)AnorexiaBilirubin (hyperbilirubinemia)Blood/Bone Marrow-Other (Specify)Bone marrow cellularityCalcium, serum-low (hypocalcemia)Carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DL(co))Cardiac General-Other (Specify)Cardiac-ischemia/infarctionColitis, infectious (e.g., Clostridium difficile)Conduction abnormality - AsystoleConfusionConstitutional Symptoms-Other (Specify)CreatinineDiarrheaDistention/bloating, abdominalDry mouth/salivary gland (xerostomia)Dyspnea (shortness of breath)Edema: limbEsophagitisFatigue (asthenia, lethargy, malaise)Febrile neutropeniaGlucose, serum-high (hyperglycemia)HemoglobinHemorrhage, GI - DuodenumHemorrhage, GU - VaginaHemorrhage, pulmo/upper resp- Bronchopulmonary NOSHemorrhage, pulmonary/upper respiratory - NoseHemorrhage/Bleeding-Other (Specify)HypertensionHypotensionHypoxiaIleus, GI (functional obstruction of bowel)Inf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - BloodInf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - BronchusInf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - KidneyInf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - LungInf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - MeningesInf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - SinusInf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - SkinInf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - Small bowelInf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - StomachInfection with unknown ANC - BloodInfection with unknown ANC - Lung (pneumonia)Infection with unknown ANC - MucosaInfection with unknown ANC - SinusInfection with unknown ANC - Small bowel NOSInfection-Other (Specify)Left ventricular diastolic dysfunctionLeukocytes (total WBC)LipaseLymphopeniaMagnesium, serum-high (hypermagnesemia)Mental statusMucositis/stomatitis (clinical exam) - Oral cavityMucositis/stomatitis (clinical exam) - PharynxMucositis/stomatitis (functional/symp) - Oral cavMusculoskeletal/Soft Tissue-Other (Specify)NauseaNecrosis, GI - Small bowel NOSNeutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)Obstruction, GI - Small bowel NOSOcular/Visual-Other (Specify)Opportunistic inf associated w/gt=Gr 2 lymphopeniaPain - Abdomen NOSPain - BonePain - EsophagusPain - Extremity-limbPain - Oral cavityPain - PeritoneumPhosphate, serum-low (hypophosphatemia)PlateletsPleural effusion (non-malignant)Potassium, serum-high (hyperkalemia)Potassium, serum-low (hypokalemia)Pulmonary hypertensionPulmonary/Upper Respiratory-Other (Specify)Rash/desquamationRenal failureRenal/Genitourinary-Other (Specify)SVT and nodal arrhythmia - Atrial fibrillationSVT and nodal arrhythmia - Atrial flutterSodium, serum-high (hypernatremia)Sodium, serum-low (hyponatremia)Syncope (fainting)Typhlitis (cecal inflammation)Ulcer, GI - DuodenumUlcerationVomitingWeight loss
Initial Cohort: Relapsed AML With Previous Remission ≥ 3 Month0001001221211001100300201320111010011111410501010100101216160100102014010100000217006100001111100020
Poor-risk Cohort: MDS Transformed to AML2313011210540110023421120218214100000222400200100210011011051000011115100300001416123010011000001020
Poor-risk Cohort: Refractory/Relapsed AML, < 6 Mths Remission2106100000310010002800200232021001100130711610001401000017090011103016002011130219003001200001010102

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR) Rate (Including CR With Incomplete Recovery)

"Participants who achieved morphological complete remission with or without incomplete blood count recovery.~Per the Revised Recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia, morphologic complete remission requires that the patient achieve the morphologic leukemia-free state and have an absolute neutrophil count of more than 1,000/μL and platelets of ≥ 100,000/μL." (NCT00840177)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years after registration

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Initial Cohort: Relapsed AML With Previous Remission ≥ 3 Month27
Poor-risk Cohort: MDS Transformed to AML14
Poor-risk Cohort: Refractory/Relapsed AML, < 6 Mths Remission14

[back to top]

Individualized Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mean Scores (Physical Component) From Week 0 to Week 8

Scores from the self-administered SF-36 (Physical component) questionnaire were measured at the start (Week 0) of the study and at the end (Week 8) among patients in the placebo- and statin-treated group. Mean scores range from 0 (minimum) - 100 (maximum) with higher mean scores reflecting better outcomes. Measures reported are the means of Week 0 and week 8, measures of dispersion is the range of scores. (NCT00850460)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 8

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 0 Mean ScoreWeek 8 Mean Score
Placebo5056
Statins5348

[back to top]

Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life (INQoL) Mean Scores From Week 0 to Week 8

Scores from the self-administered INQoL questionnaire will be compared at the start of the study (Week 0) and at the end (Week 8) between the statin-treated group and the placebo group. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being a better outcome. Measures reported are the means of Week 0 and week 8, measures of dispersion is the range of the results (3 per group). (NCT00850460)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 8

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 0 Mean ScoreWeek 8 Mean Score
Placebo6567
Statins7650

[back to top]

The Primary Objective of This Study is to Evaluate the Feasibility of Administering Intravenous Zoledronic Acid, Oral Pravastatin and Oral Lonafarnib, to Patients With Progeria for a Minimum of 4 Weeks

Feasibility was assessed by determining the number of participants with adverse events occurring over the course of the 4 week study. (NCT00879034)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Zoledronic Acid, Pravastatin, and Lonafarnib0

[back to top]

To Investigate Which Clinical and Laboratory Studies Are Needed to Monitor or Alter Therapy to Prevent Unacceptable Toxicity

The number of participants with abnormal CBC w/diff panel, LFTs, renal functions and lipid panels. (NCT00879034)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Zoledronic Acid, Pravastatin, and Lonafarnib0

[back to top]

To Describe Any Acute and Chronic Toxicities Associated With Treating Progeria Patients With the Combination of Zoledronic Acid, Pravastatin and Lonafarnib

Number of participants with acute and chronic toxicities associated with treating progeria patients with the combination of zoledronic acid, pravastatin and lonafarnib (NCT00879034)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Zoledronic Acid, Pravastatin, and Lonafarnib0

[back to top]

To Obtain Baseline Clinical and Laboratory Data so That Longer-term Measures of Efficacy Will be Achievable if Treatment Continues Beyond the 4-week Feasibility Study Period.

The number of participants from whom baseline clinical and Laboratory data was obtained. (NCT00879034)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Zoledronic Acid, Pravastatin, and Lonafarnib5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Month 4 in the Framingham Risk Score (FRS)

The Framingham Risk Score is calculated by a published algorithm that predicts a patients risk of having a coronary heart disease event in the next 10 years. The measures that are considering in predicting this risk are: age, blood pressure, cholesterol (both total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), smoking status, and use of medication to treat hypertension. This risk score can be estimated using an online calculator (http://hp2010.nhlbihin.net/atpiii/calculator.asp) (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 4 months

InterventionPercent probability of CHD event in 10yr (Median)
Lisinopril/P-placebo-1.6
L-placebo/Pravastatin-0.7
Lisinopril/Pravastatin-1.5
L-placebo/P-placebo-0.3

[back to top]

Changes hsCRP (C-reactive Protein)

This biomarker represents systemic inflammation within in the body. (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: change from baseline to 4 months

Interventionmcg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Lisinopril/L-placebo Treatment Effect-1.00

[back to top]

Changes IL-6 (Interleukin-6)

This biomarker represents systemic inflammation within in the body. (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: change from baseline to 4 months

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Lisinopril/L-placebo Treatment Effect-0.33

[back to top]

Changes in Small Artery Elasticity

Small artery elasticity is a measure of vascular function, estimated through analysis of the blood pressure waveform. A sensor is placed on wrist over the radial pulse. The blood pressure waveform of the pulse is recorded and analyzed the elasticity, or compliance, of the small (and large) vasculature. Impaired artery elasticity, or increased stiffness, is an early sign of vascular disease that predicts risk for future cardiovascular events. (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: change from baseline to 4 months

InterventionmL/mmHgx100 (Mean)
Lisinopril/L-placebo Treatment Effect0.02

[back to top]

Changes TNFa (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha)

This biomarker represents systemic inflammation within in the body. (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: change from baseline to 4 months

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Lisinopril/L-placebo Treatment Effect-0.14

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Stated (by Self-report) That They Had Side Effects

Participants were asked at each visit if they had any side effects to study medication. They provided a yes or no answer, and if yes they specified what the side effect was. (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lisinopril/P-placebo1
L-placebo/Pravastatin0
Lisinopril/Pravastatin2
L-placebo/P-placebo1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Took >90% of Their Doses (by Pill Count)

The number of pills missing from study medication bottles was counted by study nurses at the completion of the study. The proportion of pills taken divided by the number of days the participant was enrolled in the study was calculated, and multiplied by 100, to generate the '% of doses taken' (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lisinopril/P-placebo2
L-placebo/Pravastatin7
Lisinopril/Pravastatin5
L-placebo/P-placebo6

[back to top]

Changes in Blood Lipids

Blood lipids include routine cholesterol measurements that are monitored in clinical practice. They are measured in blood after a blood draw is performed. The specific measurements include: a) total cholesterol, b) low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, c) high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and d) triglycerides (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: change from baseline to 4 months

Intervention(mg/dL) (Mean)
Total CholesterolLDL-CHDL-C
Pravastatin/P-placebo Treatment Effect-1.75-0.620.97

[back to top]

Changes in Blood Pressure

Blood pressure was assessed by standard clinical methods (i.e., the same way it is measured during a routine clinic visit) (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: change from baseline to 4 months

Intervention(mmHG) (Mean)
Systolic BPDiastolic BP
Lisinopril/L-placebo Treatment Effect-1.8-3.3

[back to top]

Change in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) From Baseline to Week 12

(NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12

Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Pravastatin0.8063
Placebo-0.5136

[back to top]

Change in LDL-cholesterol Between Baseline and Week 12

(NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Pravastatin-25.565
Placebo-2.913

[back to top]

Change in MATRICS Neuropsychological Battery Composite Score From Baseline to Week 12

"The Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery measures cognitive functioning within 7 domains: speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory (non verbal and verbal), verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving and social cognition.~The composite score is calculated by the MATRICS computer program, which equally weights each of the 7 domain scores. The range of composite scores is 20-80. Higher scores indicate higher levels or cognitive functioning, while lower scores indicate lower levels of cognitive functioning." (NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Pravastatin4.0417
Placebo4.125

[back to top]

Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) General Score From Baseline to Week 12

This is a subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The range for this subscale is 15-105. All items are summed to calculate the total score. Better outcomes have lower numbers and worse outcomes have higher numbers. (NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Pravastatin-5.625
Placebo-3.76

[back to top]

Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Negative Score From Baseline to Week 12

This is a subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The range for this subscale is 7-49. All items are summed to calculate the total score. Better outcomes have lower numbers and worse outcomes have higher numbers. (NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Pravastatin-0.83
Placebo-0.28

[back to top]

Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Positive Score From Baseline to Week 12

This is a subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The range for this subscale is 7-49. All items are summed to calculate the total score. Better outcomes have lower numbers and worse outcomes have higher numbers. (NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Pravastatin-2.9583
Placebo-2.44

[back to top]

Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score From Baseline to Week 12

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is a scale used to rate severity of schizophrenia. All items are summed to calculate the total score. The scale range is 30-210. Better outcomes have lower numbers and worse outcomes have higher numbers. (NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Pravastatin-9.416
Placebo-6.48

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol(LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 12

(NCT01256476)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Pitavastatin 4 mg Once Daily (QD)-34.8
Pravastatin 40 mg Once Daily (QD)-22.7

[back to top]

Change of Fasting Serum Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at 12 Weeks

(NCT01301066)
Timeframe: 12 weeks minus baseline

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD155.1
Pravastatin 40 mg QD154.6

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Doses Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride and Etoposide When Combined With Cyclosporine and Pravastatin Sodium

"Determine the doses of mitoxantrone and etoposide that, when combined with CSA and pravastatin, meet minimum standards for both efficacy and toxicity and have the highest efficacy rate among several mitoxantrone and etoposide doses.~Assessed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0." (NCT01342887)
Timeframe: After completion of first 2 courses, up to 22 weeks

Interventiondoses tolerated (Number)
Treatment (Immunosuppression, Enzyme Inhibitor, and Chemo)0

[back to top]

Number of Biomarker-positive Participants With Clinical Responses

"Biomarkers: FLT3-ITD positive, NPM1 positive, CEBPA. A good CR is defined as <5% blasts in the marrow by morphologic evaluation along with the absence of any MRD by flow cytometry or cytogenetics and recovery of blood counts (platelets >100,00 and absolute neutrophil count >1,000) by day 35 after induction. Cheson AML Response Criteria is used for Morphologic Leukemia Free State, Morphologic Complete Remission, Cytogenetic Complete Remission (CRc), Molecular Complete Remission (CRm), Morphologic Complete Remission with Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi), Partial Remission (PR), Treatment Failure, Recurrence (Progressive Disease)." (NCT01831232)
Timeframe: 38 days after dosing

Interventionparticipants with clinical responses (Number)
Treatment (Pravastatin Sodium, Idarubicin, and Cytarabine)0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Good Complete Remission (CR)

"A Bayesian design intended to simultaneously monitor efficacy and toxicity will be used.~Definition of Good CR: Conventional criteria for CR (absolute neutrophil count > 1,000/uL, platelet count > 100,000/uL, marrow with <5% morphologic blasts) and additionally the requirements that marrow Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) - detected by 10-color flow cytometry or conventional cytogenetic evaluation - be absent and that the above blood counts be obtained." (NCT01831232)
Timeframe: 35 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Pravastatin Sodium, Idarubicin, and Cytarabine)12

[back to top]

Number of Participants With TRM.

"A Bayesian design intended to simultaneously monitor efficacy and toxicity will be used.~TRM: Treatment Related Mortality" (NCT01831232)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment (Pravastatin Sodium, Idarubicin, and Cytarabine)2

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Amount of time a patient lives after treatment with IAP (NCT01831232)
Timeframe: 1 year after treatment with IAP

Interventionpercentage of patients surviving (Number)
Treatment (Pravastatin Sodium, Idarubicin, and Cytarabine)53.5

[back to top]

Rate of Complete Remission (CR), Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi) and Partial Remission (PR)

Complete remission (CR) - includes patients with good CR and CR with minimal residual disease (MRD); remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), partial remission (PR) (NCT01831232)
Timeframe: 35 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CRCRiPR
Treatment (Pravastatin Sodium, Idarubicin, and Cytarabine)1520

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

(NCT01831232)
Timeframe: 1 year after treatment with IAP

Interventionpercentage of patients with PFS (Number)
Treatment (Pravastatin Sodium, Idarubicin, and Cytarabine)52.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Injection Site Reaction

(NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo Q4W26
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W42
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W57
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W51
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W36
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W41

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]

Data was log-transformed for MMRM analysis, with change from baseline as the dependent variable, and baseline measurement, disease classification, statin dose, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction included as independent variables. Percentage change from baseline in the original scale was then back-calculated from the log-transformed MMRM analysis. (NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

InterventionPercentage Change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Q4W-0.31
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W-16.63
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W-19.02
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W-37.29
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W-7.54
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W-21.01

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Least square (LS) Means was calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for disease classification, statin dose, baseline LDL-C measurement. Percent change from baseline response is the dependent variable. (NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Q4W7.6
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W-14.9
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W-40.5
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W-50.5
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W-14.9
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W-37.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP)

LS Mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with baseline measurement, disease classification, statin dose, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction included in the model. Percent change from baseline response is the dependent variable. (NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Q4W0.5
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W-0.2
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W1.6
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W-0.3
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W-0.3
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W-0.7

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve at Steady-State (AUC,ss) for LY3015014

(NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Week 12-16 (Q4W) - Predose, Week 8-16 (Q8W) - Predose

Interventionμg∙hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W1590
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W9670
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W27300
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W7800
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W26600

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1), Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)

LS Mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with baseline measurement, disease classification, statin dose, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction included in the model. Percent change from baseline response is the dependent variable. (NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

,,,,,
InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Apo A1Apo B
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W3.8-16.0
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W6.5-34.9
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W2.4-16.6
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W6.2-46.8
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W5.8-31.9
Placebo Q4W0.34.2

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in LDL-C, Total Cholesterol (TC), High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Triglycerides (TG), Non-HDL-C

LS Mean was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with baseline measurement, disease classification, statin dose, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction included in the model. Percent change from baseline response is the dependent variable. (NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

,,,,,
InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
LDL-CTGTCHDL-CNon-HDL-C
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W-18.4-7.2-11.04.5-16.1
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W-46.4-7.2-27.87.3-39.3
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W-18.0-6.1-10.54.5-16.1
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W-56.5-15.1-34.18.8-48.9
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W-42.2-10.6-24.68.4-35.8
Placebo Q4W5.93.53.51.64.9

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Free Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Antibody (PCSK9) Levels

LS Mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with baseline measurement, disease classification, statin dose, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction included in the model. Percent change from baseline response is the dependent variable. (NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Q4W9.9
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W-16.3
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W-36.6
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W-68.0
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W-4.4
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W-35.2

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Antibody (PCSK9) Levels

LS Mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with baseline measurement, disease classification, statin dose, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction included in the model. Percent change from baseline response is the dependent variable. (NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Q4W14.6
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W9.1
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W86.4
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W130.6
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W21.8
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W41.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Develop Treatment Emergent Anti-LY3015014 Antibodies

(NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo Q4W4
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W6
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W10
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W5
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W4
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W3

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Pravastatin

(NCT01958489)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 11: Predose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours postdose

Interventionnanograms/milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Pravastatin (Period 1)142
Evacetrapib + Pravastatin (Period 2)128

[back to top]

PK: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity [AUC(0-∞)] of Pravastatin

(NCT01958489)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 11: Predose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours postdose

Interventionnanograms*hours/milliliters (ng*h/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Pravastatin (Period 1)257
Evacetrapib + Pravastatin (Period 2)229

[back to top]

PK: Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Pravastatin

(NCT01958489)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 11: Predose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours postdose

Interventionhours (Median)
Pravastatin (Period 1)1.00
Evacetrapib + Pravastatin (Period 2)0.75

[back to top]

Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

Number of Grade 3 or above adverse events (NCT02841774)
Timeframe: 14 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Moderate Intensity Group0
High Intensity Group0

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Fasting LDL-cholesterol

Mean percent change in fasting LDL-cholesterol at Week 2 and Week 14 (NCT02841774)
Timeframe: Week 2 and Week 14

InterventionPercent decrease (Mean)
Moderate Intensity Group15.0
High Intensity Group41.6

[back to top]

Safety of Escalating Doses of Pravastatin as Assessed by Number of Adverse Events

Safety of escalating doses of pravastatin (40 mg - 160 mg) when co-administered with rifampin, as evidenced by number of Grade 3 or higher adverse events. (NCT03456102)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days

InterventionAEs Grade 3 or Higher (Number)
Pravastatin 40 mg8
Pravastatin 80 mg4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were obtained from the MMRM model to account for missing data using all available post-baseline data from Weeks 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab13.08.910.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein a (Lp) (a) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted means and standard errors were obtained from a multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on-or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab7.4-5.2-6.4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Weeks 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were obtained from the MMRM model to account for missing data using all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab-10.14.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48 - ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were obtained from the MMRM model to account for missing data using all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab-3.9-9.25.7

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were obtained from the MMRM model to account for missing data using all available post-baseline data from Weeks 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab-1.9-6.35.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting >=15 Percent (%) Reduction in LDL-C Level at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted Percentage were obtained from a multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab50.050.039.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis

Adjusted least square (LS) means and standard errors were obtained from the mixed model analysis with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data using all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab-4.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were obtained from the MMRM model to account for missing data using all available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 48 (on-treatment Analysis). (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab-4.1

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C Level at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were obtained from the MMRM model to account for missing data using all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab-33.4-43.0-15.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Tanner Staging at Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development in children and adolescent based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. Participants were evaluated for pubic hair distribution, breast development (only females) and genital development (only males), and classified in 3 categories as: Prepubescent (defined as a person just before start of the development of adult sexual characteristics), Pubescent (defined as a person at or approaching the age of puberty), Postpubescent (sexually mature or a person who has completed puberty). (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline: PrepubescentBaseline: PubescentBaseline: Post-pubescentWeek 12: PrepubescentWeek 12: PubescentWeek 12: Post-pubescentWeek 24: PrepubescentWeek 24: PubescentWeek 24: Post-pubescentWeek 48: PrepubescentWeek 48: PubescentWeek 48: Post-pubescent
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2W090081081072
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W360360260170

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were obtained from the MMRM model to account for missing data using all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab-4.2-11.80.9

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were obtained from the MMRM model to account for missing data using all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab11.314.611.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides (TG) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted means and standard errors were obtained from a multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab2.85.210.0

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline data available up to Week 12 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W-0.1
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-1.7
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-0.7
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W5.0

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data. All post-baseline data available up to Week 24 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W10.4
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-27.4
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-3.6
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-34.3

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data. All post-baseline data available up to Week 12 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W8.9
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-30.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W1.1
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-31.7

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides (TG) at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted means and standard errors were obtained from a multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline data up to Week 12. Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W6.5
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-2.2
DB Period: Placebo Q4W7.8
Db Period: Alirocumab Q4W-0.3

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides (TG) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted means and standard errors were obtained from a multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline data up to Week 24. Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W7.7
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W11.9
DB Period: Placebo Q4W12.2
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-6.8

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline data available up to Week 24 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W-0.8
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W5.6
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-1.1
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W3.4

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol < 110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Weeks 12 and 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data followed by logistic regression model. All available post-baseline on-treatment data up to Week 12 and Week 24 were included in the imputation model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for those who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W61.757.2
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W57.067.2
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.14.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W4.39.0

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted means and standard errors were obtained from a multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline data up to Week 12. Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W-7.1
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-12.7
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-2.5
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-16.0

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline data available up to Week 12 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W-2.2
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W3.5
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-3.5
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W4.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Tanner Staging at Baseline and Weeks 24, 68 and 104

Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development in children and adolescent based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. Participants were evaluated for pubic hair distribution, breast development (only females) and genital development (only males) and classified in 3 categories as: Prepubescent (defined as a person just before start of the development of adult sexual characteristics), Pubescent (defined as a person at or approaching the age of puberty), Postpubescent (sexually mature or a person who has completed puberty). (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24, 68 and 104

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline: Boys - PrepubescentBaseline: Boys - PubescentBaseline: Boys - PostpubescentBaseline: Girls - PrepubescentBaseline: Girls - PubescentBaseline: Girls - PostpubescentWeek 24: Boys - PrepubescentWeek 24: Boys - PubescentWeek 24: Boys - PostpubescentWeek 24: Girls - PrepubescentWeek 24: Girls - PubescentWeek 24: Girls - PostpubescentWeek 68: Boys - PrepubescentWeek 68: Boys - PubescentWeek 68: Boys - PostpubescentWeek 68: Girls - PrepubescentWeek 68: Girls - PubescentWeek 68: Girls - PostpubescentWeek 104: Boys - PrepubescentWeek 104: Boys - PubescentWeek 104: Boys - PostpubescentWeek 104: Girls - PrepubescentWeek 104: Girls - PubescentWeek 104: Girls - Postpubescent
Alirocumab Q2W41324161031134159196314918601011
Alirocumab Q4W01447131401252169096116908711711
Placebo/Alirocumab Q2W11331610134152074061067042
Placebo/Alirocumab Q4W543186173165153155152155

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Weeks 8, 12 and 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline data available up to Week 8, Week 12 and Week 24 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 8, 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 8Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-35.4-34.8-33.6
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-42.0-39.2-38.2
DB Period: Placebo Q2W7.110.79.7
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-3.82.3-4.4

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 30 Percent (%) Reduction in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Weeks 12 and 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data followed by logistic regression model. All available post-baseline on-treatment data up to Week 12 and Week 24 were included in the imputation model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: At Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W65.866.7
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W70.872.5
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.84.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W4.218.5

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol < 130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Weeks 12 and 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data followed by logistic regression model. All available post-baseline on-treatment data up to Week 12 and Week 24 were included in the imputation model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for those who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W70.673.3
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W72.676.3
DB Period: Placebo Q2W16.48.0
Db Period: Placebo Q4W12.922.2

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50% Reduction in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Weeks 12 and 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data followed by logistic regression model. All available post-baseline on-treatment data up to Week 12 and Week 24 were included in the imputation model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for those who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: At Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W25.221.6
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W31.932.4
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.00.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W0.19.1

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50% Reduction in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Weeks 12 and 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data followed by logistic regression model. All available post-baseline on-treatment data up to Week 12 and Week 24 were included in the imputation model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: At Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W25.221.6
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W31.932.4
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.00.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W0.19.1

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieved at Least 30% Reduction in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Weeks 12 and 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data followed by logistic regression model. All available post-baseline on-treatment data up to Week 12 and Week 24 were included in the imputation model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for those who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: At Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W65.866.7
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W70.872.5
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.84.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W4.218.5

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Weeks 8, 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline on-treatment data available up to Week 8, Week 12 and Week 24 were used for the MMRM model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 8, 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 8Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-35.4-34.8-33.6
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-42.0-39.2-38.2
DB Period: Placebo Q2W7.110.79.7
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-3.82.3-4.4

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline data available up to Week 24 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W-0.1
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W1.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-4.5
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W4.4

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline on-treatment data available up to Week 12 and Week 24 were used for the MMRM model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and at one on-treatment post-baseline value for a timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-25.3-23.4
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-27.0-27.7
DB Period: Placebo Q2W7.57.4
DB Period: Placebo Q4W0.9-4.4

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline on-treatment data available up to Week 12 and Week 24 were used for the MMRM model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and at one on-treatment post-baseline value for a timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-33.0-31.0
Db Period: Alirocumab Q4W-34.7-35.6
DB Period: Placebo Q2W9.89.7
DB Period: Placebo Q4W2.8-3.7

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Weeks 12, and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline on-treatment data available up to Week 12 and Week 24 were used for the MMRM model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and at one on-treatment post-baseline value for a timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-34.8-33.6
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-39.2-38.2
DB Period: Placebo Q2W10.79.7
DB Period: Placebo Q4W2.3-4.4

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted means and standard errors were obtained from a multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline on-treatment data up to Week 12 and Week 24, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for those who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-12.746-14.748
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-16.042-22.418
DB Period: Placebo Q2W-7.0990.492
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-2.5452.468

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline on-treatment data available up to Week 12 and Week 24 were used for the MMRM model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 day otherwise. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and at one on-treatment post-baseline value for a timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W3.55.6
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W4.03.4
DB Period: Placebo Q2W-2.2-0.8
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-3.5-1.1

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted means and standard errors were obtained from a multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline on-treatment data up to Week 12 and Week 24, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for those who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-2.211.9
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-0.3-6.8
DB Period: Placebo Q2W6.57.7
DB Period: Placebo Q4W7.812.2

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline on-treatment data available up to Week 12 and Week 24 were used for the MMRM model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and at one on-treatment post-baseline value for a timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-30.0-27.4
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-31.7-34.3
DB Period: Placebo Q2W8.910.4
DB Period: Placebo Q4W1.1-3.6

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline on-treatment data available up to Week 12 and Week 24 were used for the MMRM mode, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and at one on-treatment post-baseline value for a timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-1.71.0
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W5.04.4
DB Period: Placebo Q2W-0.1-0.1
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-0.7-4.5

[back to top]

DB Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Positive Anti-Alirocumab Antibodies (ADA) Response

Anti-drug (alirocumab) antibodies samples were analyzed using a validated non-quantitative, titer-based bridging immunoassay. Number of participants with positive ADA during 24-week treatment period is reported. Treatment-emergent positive ADA response was defined as 1) participants with no ADA positive response at baseline but with any positive response in the post-baseline period or 2) participants with a positive ADA response at baseline and at least a 4- fold increase in titer in the post-baseline period. A persistent positive response was defined as a TE ADA positive response detected in at least 2 consecutive post-baseline samples separated by at least a 12-week period. Persistent positive response was only analyzed for participants with positive TE ADA response. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TE ADA positive responsePersistent positive response
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W30

[back to top]

DB Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Positive Anti-Alirocumab Antibodies (ADA) Response

Anti-drug (alirocumab) antibodies samples were analyzed using a validated non-quantitative, titer-based bridging immunoassay. Number of participants with positive ADA during 24-week treatment period is reported. Treatment-emergent positive ADA response was defined as 1) participants with no ADA positive response at baseline but with any positive response in the post-baseline period or 2) participants with a positive ADA response at baseline and at least a 4- fold increase in titer in the post-baseline period. A persistent positive response was defined as a TE ADA positive response detected in at least 2 consecutive post-baseline samples separated by at least a 12-week period. Persistent positive response was only analyzed for participants with positive TE ADA response. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TE ADA positive response
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W0
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W0

[back to top]

DB Period: Absolute Change From Baseline in Apo B/Apo A-1 Ratio at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline on-treatment data available up to Week 12 and Week 24 were used for the MMRM model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and at one on-treatment post-baseline value for a timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 24

,,,
Interventionratio (Apo B/Apo A-1) (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-0.2-0.2
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-0.3-0.3
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.10.1
DB Period: Placebo Q4W0.00.0

[back to top]

DB Period: Absolute Change From Baseline in Apo B/Apo A-1 Ratio at Weeks 12 and 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline data available up to Week 12 and Week 24 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 24

,,,
Interventionratio (Apo B/Apo A-1) (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-0.2-0.2
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-0.3-0.3
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.10.1
DB Period: Placebo Q4W0.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cogstate Battery Test - Overall Composite Score at Weeks 24, 68 and 104

Cogstate battery test (cognitive testing system) consisted of detection test (DET), identification test (IDN), one card learning test (OCL) and Groton maze learning test (GML) to assess processing speed, attention, visual learning and executive functioning, respectively. For each test, Z-scores were computed based on participant's age at Baseline and Weeks 24, 68 and 104. Composite score: calculated as mean of Z-scores equally weighted, provided that at least 3 of 4 tests were available and if all of these domains were covered as: attention, through either DET or IDN, visual learning, through OCL and executive function, through GML. There is not minimum/maximum since values were reported as z-score but z-score of 0 means result equals to mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than mean and positive values higher. Positive change in z-score = an improvement in cognition, i.e., a better outcome; and negative change in z-score = worsening in cognition, i.e., a worse outcome. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24, 68 and 104

,,,
InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Week 24Week 68Week 104
Alirocumab Q2W-0.313-0.334-0.439
Alirocumab Q4W-0.136-0.263-0.638
Placebo/Alirocumab Q2W-0.403-0.421-0.601
Placebo/Alirocumab Q4W-0.218-0.272-0.393

[back to top]

OL Period: Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 104: On-treatment Estimand

Percent Change in LDL-C from Baseline to Week 104 was reported in this outcome measure. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
OL Period: Placebo/Alirocumab Q2W-22.8
OL Period: Alirocumab Q2W-25.8
OL Period: Placebo/Alirocumab Q4W-27.6
OL Period: Alirocumab Q4W-23.4

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data. All post-baseline data available up to Week 12 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W9.8
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-33.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W2.8
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-34.7

[back to top]

OL Period: Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 104: ITT Estimand

Percent Change in LDL-C from Baseline to Week 104 was reported in this outcome measure. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
OL Period: Placebo/Alirocumab Q2W-23.3
OL Period: Alirocumab Q2W-22.2
OL Period: Placebo/Alirocumab Q4W-27.1
OL Period: Alirocumab Q4W-23.7

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level Lower Than (<) 130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data up to Week 24 were included in the imputation model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: At Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W8.0
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W73.3
DB Period: Placebo Q4W22.2
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W76.3

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level <130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Week 12 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data up to Week 12 were included in the imputation model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: At Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W16.4
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W70.6
DB Period: Placebo Q4W12.9
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W72.6

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data up to Week 24 were included in the imputation model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: At Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W4.0
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W57.2
DB Period: Placebo Q4W9.0
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W67.2

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Week 12 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data for Q4W. All available post-baseline data up to Week 12 were included in the imputation model. For Q2W, adjusted percentages at Week 12 were obtained from last observation carried forward approach (LOCF) to handle missing on-treatment LDL-C values as well as missing post-treatment LDL-C values in participants who discontinued treatment due to the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic. Other post-treatment missing values were considered as failure. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: At Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.0
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W61.2
DB Period: Placebo Q4W4.3
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W57.0

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data. All post-baseline data available up to Week 12 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W7.5
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-25.3
DB Period: Placebo Q4W0.9
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-27.0

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data. All post-baseline data available up to Week 24 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W7.4
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-23.4
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-4.4
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-27.7

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data. All post-baseline data available up to Week 24 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W9.7
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-31.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-3.7
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-35.6

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data. All post-baseline data available up to Week 12 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W10.7
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-34.8
DB Period: Placebo Q4W2.3
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-39.2

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Estimand

Adjusted least square (LS) means and standard errors (SE) were obtained from mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) model. All post-baseline data available up to Week 24 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W9.7
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-33.6
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-4.4
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-38.2

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted means and standard errors were obtained from a multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline data up to Week 24. Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.5
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-14.7
DB Period: Placebo Q4W2.5
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-22.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Permanently Discontinue Assigned Study Regimen for Any Reason

(Other than new recognition of participant ineligibility based on absence of M. tuberculosis growth in baseline sputum cultures, or growth of M. tuberculosis resistant to rifampin by GeneXpert) (NCT03882177)
Timeframe: Measured through Day 14

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1: Pravastatin (40 mg) and Rifafour10
Arm 2: Pravastatin (80 mg) and Rifafour6
Arm 3: Pravastatin (120 mg) and Rifafour0
Arm 4: Pravastatin (160 mg) and Rifafour0

[back to top]

Frequency of Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events

Graded using the DAIDS table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Corrected Version 2.1, July 2017 (NCT03882177)
Timeframe: Measured through Day 30

InterventionAEs Grade 3 or Higher (Number)
Arm 1: Pravastatin (40 mg) and Rifafour8
Arm 2: Pravastatin (80 mg) and Rifafour4

[back to top]

Cmax for Montelukast

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of montelukast. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionNanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates379.8
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg393.5

[back to top]

Cmax for Omeprazole

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of omeprazole. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates224.4
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg256.6

[back to top]

Cmax for Pravastatin

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of pravastatin. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates19.45
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg15.19

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Caffeine

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of caffeine. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionNanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates4340
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg4110

[back to top]

Ratio of AUC(0-infinity) of 1-hydroxymidazolam to Midazolam

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of parent drug (midazolam) and its metabolite (1-hydroxymidazolam). Ratio of AUC(0-infinity) of metabolite to parent drug has been presented. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates0.4677
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg0.4618

[back to top]

Ratio of AUC(0-infinity) of 36-hydroxymontelukast to Montelukast

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of parent drug (montelukast) and its metabolite (36-hydroxymontelukast). Ratio of AUC(0-infinity) of metabolite to parent drug has been presented. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates0.09182
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg0.08562

[back to top]

Ratio of AUC(0-infinity) of 5-hydroxyomeprazole to Omeprazole

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of parent drug (omeprazole) and its metabolite (5-hydroxyomeprazole). Ratio of AUC(0-infinity) of metabolite to parent drug has been presented. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates1.151
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg1.077

[back to top]

Ratio of AUC(0-infinity) of Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol to Metoprolol

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of parent drug (metoprolol) and its metabolite (alpha-hydroxymetoprolol). Ratio of AUC(0-infinity) of metabolite to parent drug has been presented. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates1.733
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg1.449

[back to top]

Ratio of Cmax of 1-hydroxymidazolam to Midazolam

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of parent drug (midazolam) and its metabolite (1-hydroxymidazolam). Ratio of Cmax of metabolite to parent drug has been presented. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates0.5286
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg0.4955

[back to top]

Ratio of Cmax of 36-hydroxymontelukast to Montelukast

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of parent drug (montelukast) and its metabolite (36-hydroxymontelukast). Ratio of Cmax of metabolite to parent drug has been presented. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates0.06766
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg0.06308

[back to top]

Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate

Respiratory rate was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 1, Pre-Dose), before the dose in Treatment A. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Day 2

InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates-0.3

[back to top]

Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

Intervention10^12 cells per liter (Mean)
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg0.083

[back to top]

Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionPicograms (Mean)
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg-0.05

[back to top]

Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionFemtoliter (Mean)
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg0.94

[back to top]

Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Hematocrit

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: hematocrit. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionProportion of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg0.0118

[back to top]

Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: hemoglobin. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg2.3

[back to top]

Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Oral Temperature

Oral temperature was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 11, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment B. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 11, Pre-Dose) and Day 20

InterventionDegrees Celsius (Mean)
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg-0.03

[back to top]

Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate

Pulse rate was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 11, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment B. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 11, Pre-Dose) and Day 20

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg1.3

[back to top]

Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate

Respiratory rate was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 11, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment B. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 11, Pre-Dose) and Day 20

InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg-0.3

[back to top]

Treatment C: AUC From Time Zero to the End of the Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUC[0-tau]) for GSK3640254

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for steady-state pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3640254. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and at 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg22920

[back to top]

Treatment C: AUC(0-t) for GSK3640254

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for steady-state pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3640254. The AUC(0-t) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and at 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg51840

[back to top]

Treatment C: Cmax for GSK3640254

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for steady-state pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3640254. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and at 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 3

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg1450

[back to top]

Treatment C: Plasma Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval (Ctau) for GSK3640254

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for steady-state pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3640254. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and at 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 3

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg729.5

[back to top]

Treatment C: t1/2 for GSK3640254

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for steady-state pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3640254. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and at 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 3

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg29.556

[back to top]

Treatment C: Tmax for GSK3640254

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for steady-state pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3640254. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and at 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 3

InterventionHours (Median)
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg4.500

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, was life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and other situations according to medical or scientific judgement. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Up to Day 26

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AEsSAEs
Treatment A: Probe Substrates10
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg50
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg50

[back to top]

Treatment A: Absolute Values for Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)

Twelve-lead ECGs were obtained to measure PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval and QTcF Interval. Twelve-lead ECGs were performed with the participant in a supine position after a rest of at least 10 minutes. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 1, Pre-Dose), before the dose in Treatment A. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-Dose) and Day 10

InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose): PR IntervalDay 10: PR IntervalBaseline (Day 1, Pre-dose): QRS DurationDay 10: QRS DurationBaseline (Day 1, Pre-dose): QT IntervalDay 10: QT IntervalBaseline (Day 1, Pre-dose): QTcF IntervalDay 10: QTcF Interval
Treatment A: Probe Substrates154.8158.292.595.0391.2398.3401.0405.8

[back to top]

Treatment A: Absolute Values of Albumin, Globulin, Protein

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: albumin, globulin and protein. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day -1): AlbuminDay 10: AlbuminBaseline (Day -1): GlobulinDay 10: GlobulinBaseline (Day -1): ProteinDay 10: Protein
Treatment A: Probe Substrates42.942.227.425.970.368.1

[back to top]

Treatment A: Absolute Values of Amylase, Lipase

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: amylase and lipase. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionUnits per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day -1): LipaseDay 10: LipaseBaseline (Day -1): AmylaseDay 10: Amylase
Treatment A: Probe Substrates29.431.659.556.9

[back to top]

Treatment A: Absolute Values of Creatine Kinase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Gamma-glutamyl Transferase

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, ALT, ALP, AST and gamma-glutamyl transferase. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionInternational units per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day -1): Creatine kinaseDay 10: Creatine kinaseBaseline (Day -1): Lactate dehydrogenaseDay 10: Lactate dehydrogenaseBaseline (Day -1): ALTDay 10: ALTBaseline (Day -1): ALPDay 10: ALPBaseline (Day -1): ASTDay 10: ASTBaseline (Day -1): Gamma-glutamyl transferaseDay 10: Gamma-glutamyl transferase
Treatment A: Probe Substrates103.766.9131.3114.815.620.162.760.814.615.619.118.9

[back to top]

Treatment A: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

Intervention10^12 cells per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day -1)Day 10
Treatment A: Probe Substrates4.8364.664

[back to top]

Treatment A: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionPicograms (Mean)
Baseline (Day -1)Day 10
Treatment A: Probe Substrates29.3729.57

[back to top]

Treatment A: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionFemtoliter (Mean)
Baseline (Day -1)Day 10
Treatment A: Probe Substrates86.7188.02

[back to top]

Treatment A: Absolute Values of Glucose, Carbon Dioxide, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Anion Gap, Calcium, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Urea

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: glucose, carbon dioxide, cholesterol, triglycerides, anion gap, calcium, chloride, phosphate, potassium, sodium, urea. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionMillimoles per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day -1): GlucoseDay 10: GlucoseBaseline (Day -1): Carbon DioxideDay 10: Carbon DioxideBaseline (Day -1): CholesterolDay 10: CholesterolBaseline (Day -1): TriglyceridesDay 10: TriglyceridesBaseline (Day -1): Anion GapDay 10: Anion GapBaseline (Day -1): CalciumDay 10: CalciumBaseline (Day -1): ChlorideDay 10: ChlorideBaseline (Day -1): PhosphateDay 10: PhosphateBaseline (Day -1): PotassiumDay 10: PotassiumBaseline (Day -1): SodiumDay 10: SodiumBaseline (Day -1): UreaDay 10: Urea
Treatment A: Probe Substrates5.03484.8211104.125.44.45703.81181.22321.18147.913.82.37652.314125.8103.71.10751.17544.484.43137.7138.44.81955.9458

[back to top]

Treatment A: Absolute Values of Hematocrit

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: hematocrit. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionProportion of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
Baseline (Day -1)Day 10
Treatment A: Probe Substrates0.41880.4098

[back to top]

Treatment A: Absolute Values of Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: hemoglobin. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day -1)Day 10
Treatment A: Probe Substrates141.9137.7

[back to top]

Treatment A: Absolute Values of Oral Temperature

Oral temperature was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 1, Pre-Dose), before the dose in Treatment A. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Day 10

InterventionDegrees Celsius (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose)Day 10
Treatment A: Probe Substrates36.3836.26

[back to top]

Treatment A: Absolute Values of Platelet Count, Leukocyte Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils, Basophils

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameters: platelet count, leukocyte count, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

Intervention10^9 cells per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day -1): Platelet countDay 10: Platelet countBaseline (Day -1): Leukocyte countDay 10: Leukocyte countBaseline (Day -1): NeutrophilsDay 10: NeutrophilsBaseline (Day -1): LymphocytesDay 10: LymphocytesBaseline (Day -1): MonocytesDay 10: MonocytesBaseline (Day -1): EosinophilsDay 10: EosinophilsBaseline (Day -1): BasophilsDay 10: Basophils
Treatment A: Probe Substrates258.6265.95.646.303.15043.74301.82171.89650.48900.45150.14610.16100.03310.0440

[back to top]

Treatment A: Absolute Values of Pulse Rate

Pulse rate was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 1, Pre-Dose), before the dose in Treatment A. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Day 10

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose)Day 10
Treatment A: Probe Substrates64.565.0

[back to top]

Treatment A: Absolute Values of Respiratory Rate

Respiratory rate was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 1, Pre-Dose), before the dose in Treatment A. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Day 2

InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose)Day 2
Treatment A: Probe Substrates16.115.8

[back to top]

Treatment A: Absolute Values of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

SBP and DBP were measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 1, Pre-Dose), before the dose in Treatment A. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Day 10

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose): SBPDay 10: SBPBaseline (Day 1, Pre-dose): DBPDay 10: DBP
Treatment A: Probe Substrates111.0107.765.159.7

[back to top]

Treatment A: Absolute Values of Urate, Creatinine, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: urate, creatinine, bilirubin and direct bilirubin. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day -1): UrateDay 10: UrateBaseline (Day -1): CreatinineDay 10: CreatinineBaseline (Day -1): BilirubinDay 10: BilirubinBaseline (Day -1): Direct bilirubinDay 10: Direct bilirubin
Treatment A: Probe Substrates347.3632365.504684.952486.41109.83258.00282.05201.7015

[back to top]

Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Albumin, Globulin, Protein

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: albumin, globulin and protein. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
AlbuminGlobulinProtein
Treatment A: Probe Substrates-0.7-1.5-2.2

[back to top]

Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Amylase, Lipase

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: amylase and lipase. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionUnits per liter (Mean)
LipaseAmylase
Treatment A: Probe Substrates2.2-2.6

[back to top]

Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Creatine Kinase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, ALT, ALP, AST, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, ALT, ALP, AST and gamma-glutamyl transferase. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionInternational units per liter (Mean)
Creatine kinaseLactate dehydrogenaseALTALPASTGamma-glutamyl transferase
Treatment A: Probe Substrates-36.9-16.54.5-1.91.0-0.2

[back to top]

Treatment A: Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcF

Twelve-lead ECGs were obtained to measure PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval and QTcF Interval. Twelve-lead ECGs were performed with the participant in a supine position after a rest of at least 10 minutes. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 1, Pre-Dose), before the dose in Treatment A. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Day 10

InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
PR IntervalQRS DurationQT IntervalQTcF Interval
Treatment A: Probe Substrates3.42.57.14.8

[back to top]

Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Glucose, Carbon Dioxide, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Anion Gap, Calcium, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Urea

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: glucose, carbon dioxide, cholesterol, triglycerides, anion gap, calcium, chloride, phosphate, potassium, sodium, and urea. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionMillimoles per liter (Mean)
GlucoseCarbon DioxideCholesterolTriglyceridesAnion GapCalciumChloridePhosphatePotassiumSodiumUrea
Treatment A: Probe Substrates-0.2137-78.7-0.6452-0.04185.9-0.062478.00.0678-0.050.71.1263

[back to top]

Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Platelet Count, Leukocyte Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils, Basophils

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameters: platelet count, leukocyte count, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

Intervention10^9 cells per liter (Mean)
Platelet countLeukocyte countNeutrophilsLymphocytesMonocytesEosinophilsBasophils
Treatment A: Probe Substrates7.30.660.59260.0748-0.03750.01500.0110

[back to top]

Treatment A: Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP

SBP and DBP were measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 1, Pre-Dose), before the dose in Treatment A. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Day 10

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (Mean)
SBPDBP
Treatment A: Probe Substrates-3.3-5.4

[back to top]

Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Urate, Creatinine, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: urate, creatinine, bilirubin and direct bilirubin. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
UrateCreatinineBilirubinDirect bilirubin
Treatment A: Probe Substrates18.14141.4586-1.8297-0.3506

[back to top]

Treatment B: Absolute Values for ECG Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcF Interval

Twelve-lead ECGs were obtained to measure PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval and QTcF Interval. Twelve-lead ECGs were performed with the participant in a supine position after a rest of at least 10 minutes. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 11, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment B. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 11, Pre-Dose) and Day 20

InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
Baseline (Day 11, Pre-dose): PR IntervalDay 20: PR IntervalBaseline (Day 11, Pre-dose): QRS DurationDay 20: QRS DurationBaseline (Day 11, Pre-dose): QT IntervalDay 20: QT IntervalBaseline (Day 11, Pre-dose): QTcF IntervalDay 20: QTcF Interval
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg158.6161.894.296.4403.1408.8403.5408.6

[back to top]

Treatment B: Absolute Values of Albumin, Globulin, Protein

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: albumin, globulin and protein. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 10): AlbuminDay 20: AlbuminBaseline (Day 10): GlobulinDay 20: GlobulinBaseline (Day 10): ProteinDay 20: Protein
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg42.241.425.926.868.168.2

[back to top]

Treatment B: Absolute Values of Amylase, Lipase

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: amylase and lipase. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionUnits per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 10): LipaseDay 20: LipaseBaseline (Day 10): AmylaseDay 20: Amylase
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg31.632.456.960.1

[back to top]

Treatment B: Absolute Values of Creatine Kinase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, ALT, ALP, AST, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, ALT, ALP, AST, and gamma-glutamyl transferase. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionInternational units per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 10): Creatine kinaseDay 20: Creatine kinaseBaseline (Day 10): Lactate dehydrogenaseDay 20: Lactate dehydrogenaseBaseline (Day 10): ALTDay 20: ALTBaseline (Day 10): ALPDay 20: ALPBaseline (Day 10): ASTDay 20: ASTBaseline (Day 10): Gamma-glutamyl transferaseDay 20: Gamma-glutamyl transferase
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg66.968.9114.8115.920.120.360.858.515.616.118.918.3

[back to top]

Treatment B: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

Intervention10^12 cells per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 10)Day 20
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg4.6644.746

[back to top]

Treatment B: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionPicograms (Mean)
Baseline (Day 10)Day 20
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg29.5729.52

[back to top]

Treatment B: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionFemtoliter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 10)Day 20
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg88.0288.96

[back to top]

Treatment B: Absolute Values of Glucose, Carbon Dioxide, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Anion Gap, Calcium, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Urea

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: glucose, carbon dioxide, cholesterol, triglycerides, anion gap, calcium, chloride, phosphate, potassium, sodium, and urea. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionMillimoles per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 10): GlucoseDay 20: GlucoseBaseline (Day 10): Carbon DioxideDay 20: Carbon DioxideBaseline (Day 10): CholesterolDay 20: CholesterolBaseline (Day 10): TriglyceridesDay 20: TriglyceridesBaseline (Day 10): Anion GapDay 20: Anion GapBaseline (Day 10): CalciumDay 20: CalciumBaseline (Day 10): ChlorideDay 20: ChlorideBaseline (Day 10): PhosphateDay 20: PhosphateBaseline (Day 10): PotassiumDay 20: PotassiumBaseline (Day 10): SodiumDay 20: SodiumBaseline (Day 10): UreaDay 20: Urea
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg4.82114.737825.424.93.81183.69151.18141.082513.814.52.31412.3141103.7103.61.17541.25934.434.39138.4138.65.94585.6335

[back to top]

Treatment B: Absolute Values of Hematocrit

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: hematocrit. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionProportion of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
Baseline (Day 10)Day 20
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg0.40980.4216

[back to top]

Treatment B: Absolute Values of Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: hemoglobin. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 10)Day 20
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg137.7140.0

[back to top]

Treatment B: Absolute Values of Oral Temperature

Oral temperature was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 11, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment B. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 11, Pre-Dose) and Day 20

InterventionDegrees Celsius (Mean)
Baseline (Day 11, Pre-dose)Day 20
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg36.3136.28

[back to top]

Treatment B: Absolute Values of Platelet Count, Leukocyte Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils, Basophils

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameters: platelet count, leukocyte count, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

Intervention10^9 cells per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 10): Platelet countDay 20: Platelet countBaseline (Day 10): Leukocyte countDay 20: Leukocyte countBaseline (Day 10): NeutrophilsDay 20: NeutrophilsBaseline (Day 10): LymphocytesDay 20: LymphocytesBaseline (Day 10): MonocytesDay 20: MonocytesBaseline (Day 10): EosinophilsDay 20: EosinophilsBaseline (Day 10): BasophilsDay 20: Basophils
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg265.9261.96.305.793.74303.26801.89651.83550.45150.44350.16100.19200.04400.0460

[back to top]

Treatment B: Absolute Values of Pulse Rate

Pulse rate was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 11, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment B. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 11, Pre-Dose) and Day 20

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Baseline (Day 11, Pre-dose)Day 20
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg61.662.8

[back to top]

Treatment B: Absolute Values of Respiratory Rate

Respiratory rate was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 11, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment B. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 11, Pre-Dose) and Day 20

InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
Baseline (Day 11, Pre-dose)Day 20
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg15.014.7

[back to top]

Treatment B: Absolute Values of SBP and DBP

SBP and DBP were measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 11, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment B. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 11, Pre-Dose) and Day 20

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (Mean)
Baseline (Day 11, Pre-dose): SBPDay 20: SBPBaseline (Day 11, Pre-dose): DBPDay 20: DBP
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg107.7107.261.659.6

[back to top]

Treatment B: Absolute Values of Urate, Creatinine, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: urate, creatinine, bilirubin and direct bilirubin. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 10): UrateDay 20: UrateBaseline (Day 10): CreatinineDay 20: CreatinineBaseline (Day 10): BilirubinDay 20: BilirubinBaseline (Day 10): Direct bilirubinDay 20: Direct bilirubin
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg365.5046337.846486.411090.78688.00288.61841.70151.8126

[back to top]

Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Albumin, Globulin, Protein

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: albumin, globulin and protein. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
AlbuminGlobulinProtein
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg-0.90.90.1

[back to top]

Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Amylase, Lipase

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: amylase and lipase. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionUnits per liter (Mean)
LipaseAmylase
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg0.93.2

[back to top]

Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Creatine Kinase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, ALT, ALP, AST, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, ALT, ALP, AST, and gamma-glutamyl transferase. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionInternational units per liter (Mean)
Creatine kinaseLactate dehydrogenaseALTALPASTGamma-glutamyl transferase
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg2.11.10.3-2.40.6-0.6

[back to top]

Treatment B: Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcF

Twelve-lead ECGs were obtained to measure PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval and QTcF Interval. Twelve-lead ECGs were performed with the participant in a supine position after a rest of at least 10 minutes. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 11, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment B. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 11, Pre-Dose) and Day 20

InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
PR IntervalQRS DurationQT IntervalQTcF Interval
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg3.22.35.75.1

[back to top]

Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Glucose, Carbon Dioxide, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Anion Gap, Calcium, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Urea

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: glucose, carbon dioxide, cholesterol, triglycerides, anion gap, calcium, chloride, phosphate, potassium, sodium, and urea. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionMillimoles per liter (Mean)
GlucoseCarbon DioxideCholesterolTriglyceridesAnion GapCalciumChloridePhosphatePotassiumSodiumUrea
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg-0.0833-0.6-0.1203-0.09890.80.0000-0.10.0840-0.050.3-0.3124

[back to top]

Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Platelet Count, Leukocyte Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils, Basophils

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameters: platelet count, leukocyte count, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

Intervention10^9 cells per liter (Mean)
Platelet countLeukocyte countNeutrophilsLymphocytesMonocytesEosinophilsBasophils
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg-4.1-0.51-0.4750-0.0610-0.00800.03100.0020

[back to top]

Treatment B: Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP

SBP and DBP were measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 11, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment B. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 11, Pre-Dose) and Day 20

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (Mean)
SBPDBP
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg-0.5-2.0

[back to top]

Treatment B: Change From Baseline in Urate, Creatinine, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: urate, creatinine, bilirubin and direct bilirubin. Baseline for treatment B was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 10), before the first dose of Treatment B. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 10) and Day 20

InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
UrateCreatinineBilirubinDirect bilirubin
Treatment B: GSK3640254 200 mg-27.65824.37580.61560.1112

[back to top]

Treatment C: Absolute Values for ECG Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcF Interval

Twelve-lead ECGs were obtained to measure PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval and QTcF Interval. Twelve-lead ECGs were performed with the participant in a supine position after a rest of at least 10 minutes. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 21, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment C. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 21, Pre-Dose), Days 22 and 25

InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
Baseline (Day 21, Pre-dose): PR IntervalDay 22: PR IntervalDay 25: PR IntervalBaseline (Day 21, Pre-dose): QRS DurationDay 22: QRS DurationDay 25: QRS DurationBaseline (Day 21, Pre-dose): QT IntervalDay 22: QT IntervalDay 25: QT IntervalBaseline (Day 21, Pre-dose): QTcF IntervalDay 22: QTcF IntervalDay 25: QTcF Interval
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg160.8162.3159.695.898.796.8402.6420.6398.7408.7407.3402.5

[back to top]

Treatment C: Absolute Values of Albumin, Globulin, Protein

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: albumin, globulin and protein. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 20): AlbuminDay 22: AlbuminDay 25: AlbuminBaseline (Day 20): GlobulinDay 22: GlobulinDay 25: GlobulinBaseline (Day 20): ProteinDay 22: ProteinDay 25: Protein
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg41.640.542.026.925.126.668.565.668.6

[back to top]

Treatment C: Absolute Values of Amylase, Lipase

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: amylase and lipase. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionUnits per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 20): LipaseDay 22: LipaseDay 25: LipaseBaseline (Day 20): AmylaseDay 22: AmylaseDay 25: Amylase
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg32.933.533.162.264.760.7

[back to top]

Treatment C: Absolute Values of Creatine Kinase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, ALT, ALP, AST, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, ALT, ALP, AST, gamma-glutamyl transferase. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionInternational units per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 20): Creatine kinaseDay 22: Creatine kinaseDay 25: Creatine kinaseBaseline (Day 20): Lactate dehydrogenaseDay 22: Lactate dehydrogenaseDay 25: Lactate dehydrogenaseBaseline (Day 20): ALTDay 22: ALTDay 25: ALTBaseline (Day 20): ALPDay 22: ALPDay 25:ALPBaseline (Day 20): ASTDay 22: ASTDay 25: ASTBaseline (Day 20): Gamma-glutamyl transferaseDay 22: Gamma-glutamyl transferaseDay 25: Gamma-glutamyl transferase
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg71.365.763.8116.6120.6119.320.417.320.958.557.658.616.214.716.418.517.118.7

[back to top]

Treatment C: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

Intervention10^12 cells per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 20)Day 22Day 25
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg4.7694.6084.756

[back to top]

Treatment C: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionPicograms (Mean)
Baseline (Day 20)Day 22Day 25
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg29.5129.2829.12

[back to top]

Treatment C: Absolute Values of Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionFemtoliter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 20)Day 22Day 25
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg89.0387.3887.74

[back to top]

Treatment C: Absolute Values of Glucose, Carbon Dioxide, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Anion Gap, Calcium, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Urea

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: glucose, carbon dioxide, cholesterol, triglycerides, anion gap, calcium, chloride, phosphate, potassium, sodium and urea. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionMillimoles per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 20): GlucoseDay 22: GlucoseDay 25: GlucoseBaseline (Day 20): Carbon DioxideDay 22: Carbon DioxideDay 25: Carbon DioxideBaseline (Day 20): CholesterolDay 22: CholesterolDay 25: CholesterolBaseline (Day 20): TriglyceridesDay 22: TriglyceridesDay 25: TriglyceridesBaseline (Day 20): Anion GapDay 22: Anion GapDay 25: Anion GapBaseline (Day 20): CalciumDay 22: CalciumDay 25: CalciumBaseline (Day 20): ChlorideDay 22: ChlorideDay 25: ChlorideBaseline (Day 20): PhosphateDay 22: PhosphateDay 25: PhosphateBaseline (Day 20): PotassiumDay 22: PotassiumDay 25: PotassiumBaseline (Day 20): SodiumDay 22: SodiumDay 25: SodiumBaseline (Day 20): UreaDay 22: UreaDay 25: Urea
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg4.71844.80604.870324.925.426.23.68983.25433.39721.07831.08361.107414.613.914.52.32172.28102.3519103.4104.8102.61.26611.19811.34774.384.344.35138.6139.8139.05.73644.90785.3099

[back to top]

Treatment C: Absolute Values of Hematocrit

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: hematocrit. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionProportion of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
Baseline (Day 20)Day 22Day 25
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg0.42390.40220.4168

[back to top]

Treatment C: Absolute Values of Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: hemoglobin. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 20)Day 22Day 25
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg140.6134.7138.3

[back to top]

Treatment C: Absolute Values of Oral Temperature

Oral temperature was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 21, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment C. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 21, Pre-Dose), Days 22 and 25

InterventionDegrees Celsius (Mean)
Baseline (Day 21, Pre-dose)Day 22Day 25
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg36.3136.1836.31

[back to top]

Treatment C: Absolute Values of Platelet Count, Leukocyte Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils, Basophils

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameters: platelet count, leukocyte count, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

Intervention10^9 cells per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 20): Platelet countDay 22: Platelet countDay 25: Platelet countBaseline (Day 20): Leukocyte countDay 22: Leukocyte countDay 25: Leukocyte countBaseline (Day 20): NeutrophilsDay 22: NeutrophilsDay 25: NeutrophilsBaseline (Day 20): LymphocytesDay 22: LymphocytesDay 25: LymphocytesBaseline (Day 20): MonocytesDay 22: MonocytesDay 25: MonocytesBaseline (Day 20): EosinophilsDay 22: EosinophilsDay 25: EosinophilsBaseline (Day 20): BasophilsDay 22: BasophilsDay 25: Basophils
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg262.3249.2260.75.865.815.983.31793.19253.45291.84371.87871.92800.45050.46890.35760.19530.22820.18370.04740.03800.0408

[back to top]

Treatment C: Absolute Values of Pulse Rate

Pulse rate was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 21, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment C. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 21, Pre-Dose), Days 22 and 25

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Baseline (Day 21, Pre-dose)Day 22Day 25
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg63.256.261.7

[back to top]

Treatment C: Absolute Values of Respiratory Rate

Respiratory rate was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 21, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment C. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 21, Pre-Dose), Days 22 and 25

InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
Baseline (Day 21, Pre-dose)Day 22Day 25
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg15.715.716.5

[back to top]

Treatment C: Absolute Values of SBP and DBP

SBP and DBP were measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 21, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment C. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 21, Pre-Dose), Days 22 and 25

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (Mean)
Baseline (Day 21, Pre-dose): SBPDay 22: SBPDay 25: SBPBaseline (Day 21, Pre-dose): DBPDay 22: DBPDay 25: DBP
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg107.5105.6109.762.758.462.2

[back to top]

Treatment C: Absolute Values of Urate, Creatinine, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: urate, creatinine, bilirubin and direct bilirubin. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
Baseline (Day 20): UrateDay 22: UrateDay 25: UrateBaseline (Day 20): CreatinineDay 22: CreatinineDay 25: CreatinineBaseline (Day 20): BilirubinDay 22: BilirubinDay 25: BilirubinBaseline (Day 20): Direct bilirubinDay 22: Direct bilirubinDay 25: Direct bilirubin
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg343.1057303.0349340.601392.168687.376490.58678.74809.88209.03601.84502.07901.9980

[back to top]

Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Albumin, Globulin, Protein

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: albumin, globulin and protein. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Day 22: AlbuminDay 25: AlbuminDay 22: GlobulinDay 25: GlobulinDay 22: ProteinDay 25: Protein
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg-1.10.4-1.8-0.3-2.90.2

[back to top]

Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Amylase, Lipase

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: amylase and lipase. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionUnits per liter (Mean)
Day 22: LipaseDay 25: LipaseDay 22: AmylaseDay 25: Amylase
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg0.60.22.5-1.5

[back to top]

Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Creatine Kinase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, ALT, ALP, AST, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, ALT, ALP, AST, gamma-glutamyl transferase. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionInternational units per liter (Mean)
Day 22: Creatine kinaseDay 25: Creatine kinaseDay 22: Lactate dehydrogenaseDay 25: Lactate dehydrogenaseDay 22: ALTDay 25: ALTDay 22: ALPDay 25:ALPDay 22: ASTDay 25: ASTDay 22: Gamma-glutamyl transferaseDay 25: Gamma-glutamyl transferase
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg-5.6-7.54.02.6-3.10.5-0.90.1-1.50.2-1.50.2

[back to top]

Treatment C: Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcF

Twelve-lead ECGs were obtained to measure PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval and QTcF Interval. Twelve-lead ECGs were performed with the participant in a supine position after a rest of at least 10 minutes. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 21, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment C. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 21, Pre-Dose), Days 22 and 25

InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
Day 22: PR IntervalDay 25: PR IntervalDay 22: QRS DurationDay 25: QRS DurationDay 22: QT IntervalDay 25: QT IntervalDay 22: QTcF IntervalDay 25: QTcF Interval
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg1.5-1.22.91.018.0-3.9-1.4-6.3

[back to top]

Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Oral Temperature

Oral temperature was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 1, Pre-Dose), before the dose in Treatment A. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Day 10

InterventionDegrees Celsius (Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates-0.12

[back to top]

Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionPicograms (Mean)
Day 22Day 25
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg-0.23-0.39

[back to top]

Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionFemtoliter (Mean)
Day 22Day 25
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg-1.64-1.28

[back to top]

Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Glucose, Carbon Dioxide, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Anion Gap, Calcium, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Urea

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: glucose, carbon dioxide, cholesterol, triglycerides, anion gap, calcium, chloride, phosphate, potassium, sodium and urea. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionMillimoles per liter (Mean)
Day 22: GlucoseDay 25: GlucoseDay 22: Carbon DioxideDay 25: Carbon DioxideDay 22: CholesterolDay 25: CholesterolDay 22: TriglyceridesDay 25: TriglyceridesDay 22: Anion GapDay 25: Anion GapDay 22: CalciumDay 25: CalciumDay 22: ChlorideDay 25: ChlorideDay 22: PhosphateDay 25: PhosphateDay 22: PotassiumDay 25: PotassiumDay 22: SodiumDay 25: SodiumDay 22: UreaDay 25: Urea
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg0.08760.15190.51.2-0.4355-0.29260.00540.0291-0.6-0.1-0.04070.03021.4-0.8-0.06800.0816-0.04-0.031.20.4-0.8286-0.4265

[back to top]

Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Hematocrit

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: hematocrit. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionProportion of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
Day 22Day 25
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg-0.0217-0.0071

[back to top]

Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: hemoglobin. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Day 22Day 25
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg-5.8-2.3

[back to top]

Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Oral Temperature

Oral temperature was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 21, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment C. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 21, Pre-Dose), Days 22 and 25

InterventionDegrees Celsius (Mean)
Day 22Day 25
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg-0.130.01

[back to top]

Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Platelet Count, Leukocyte Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils, Basophils

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameters: platelet count, leukocyte count, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

Intervention10^9 cells per liter (Mean)
Day 22: Platelet countDay 25: Platelet countDay 22: Leukocyte countDay 25: Leukocyte countDay 22: NeutrophilsDay 25: NeutrophilsDay 22: LymphocytesDay 25: LymphocytesDay 22: MonocytesDay 25: MonocytesDay 22: EosinophilsDay 25: EosinophilsDay 22: BasophilsDay 25: Basophils
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg-13.1-1.6-0.050.12-0.12540.13510.03510.08430.0184-0.09290.0329-0.0115-0.0094-0.0066

[back to top]

Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate

Pulse rate was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 21, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment C. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 21, Pre-Dose), Days 22 and 25

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Day 22Day 25
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg-7.1-1.5

[back to top]

Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate

Respiratory rate was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 21, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment C. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 21, Pre-Dose), Days 22 and 25

InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
Day 22Day 25
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg-0.10.8

[back to top]

Treatment C: Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP

SBP and DBP were measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 21, Pre-Dose), before the first dose in Treatment C. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 21, Pre-Dose), Days 22 and 25

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (Mean)
Day 22: SBPDay 25: SBPDay 22: DBPDay 25: DBP
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg-1.92.2-4.3-0.5

[back to top]

Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Urate, Creatinine, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: urate, creatinine, bilirubin and direct bilirubin. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
Day 22: UrateDay 25: UrateDay 22: CreatinineDay 25: CreatinineDay 22: BilirubinDay 25: BilirubinDay 22: Direct bilirubinDay 25: Direct bilirubin
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg-40.0707-2.5044-4.7922-1.58191.13400.28800.23400.1530

[back to top]

Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: hemoglobin. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates-4.2

[back to top]

Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionFemtoliter (Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates1.31

[back to top]

Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionPicograms (Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates0.20

[back to top]

Apparent Terminal Phase Half-life (t1/2) for Caffeine

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of caffeine. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates5.380
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg6.085

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to Time t (AUC[0-t]) for Caffeine

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of caffeine. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to time t, to be calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHour*nanograms per milliliter (h*ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates37970
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg42230

[back to top]

AUC From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC[0-infinity]) for Caffeine

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of caffeine. The AUC(0-infinity) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates39720
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg44440

[back to top]

AUC(0-infinity) for 1-hydroxymidazolam

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of 1-hydroxymidazolam. 1-hydroxymidazolam is a metabolite of midazolam. The AUC(0-infinity) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates31.86
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg28.99

[back to top]

AUC(0-infinity) for 36-hydroxymontelukast

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of 36-hydroxymontelukast. 36-hydroxymontelukast is a metabolite of montelukast. The AUC(0-infinity) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates252.5
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg249.3

[back to top]

AUC(0-infinity) for 5-hydroxyomeprazole

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of 5-hydroxyomeprazole. 5-hydroxyomeprazole is a metabolite of omeprazole. The AUC(0-infinity) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates767.4
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg762.0

[back to top]

AUC(0-infinity) for Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of alpha-hydroxymetoprolol. Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol is a metabolite of metoprolol. The AUC(0-infinity) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates682.8
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg632.8

[back to top]

AUC(0-infinity) for Digoxin

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of digoxin. The AUC(0-infinity) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*pg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates19180
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg20090

[back to top]

AUC(0-infinity) for Flurbiprofen

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of flurbiprofen. The AUC(0-infinity) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates66700
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg68660

[back to top]

Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

Intervention10^12 cells per liter (Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates-0.172

[back to top]

Tmax for Pravastatin

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of pravastatin. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Median)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates1.500
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg3.000

[back to top]

Tmax for Omeprazole

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of omeprazole. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Median)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates6.000
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg6.000

[back to top]

Tmax for Montelukast

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of montelukast. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Median)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates5.000
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg6.000

[back to top]

Tmax for Midazolam

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of midazolam. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Median)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates1.000
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg1.000

[back to top]

Tmax for Metoprolol

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of metoprolol. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Median)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates2.000
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg3.000

[back to top]

Tmax for Flurbiprofen

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of flurbiprofen. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Median)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates3.000
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg4.000

[back to top]

Tmax for Digoxin

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of digoxin. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Median)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates3.000
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg2.000

[back to top]

Tmax for Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of alpha-hydroxymetoprolol. Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol is a metabolite of metoprolol. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Median)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates3.033
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg4.000

[back to top]

Tmax for 5-hydroxyomeprazole

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of 5-hydroxyomeprazole. 5-hydroxyomeprazole is a metabolite of omeprazole. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Median)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates6.000
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg6.000

[back to top]

Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate

Pulse rate was measured in the supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 1, Pre-Dose), before the dose in Treatment A. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Day 10

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates0.5

[back to top]

AUC(0-infinity) for Metoprolol

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of metoprolol. The AUC(0-infinity) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates659.1
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg813.1

[back to top]

Tmax for 36-hydroxymontelukast

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of 36-hydroxymontelukast. 36-hydroxymontelukast is a metabolite of montelukast. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Median)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates6.000
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg6.000

[back to top]

Tmax for 1-hydroxymidazolam

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of 1-hydroxymidazolam. 1-hydroxymidazolam is a metabolite of midazolam. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Median)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates1.000
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg1.000

[back to top]

Time to Cmax (Tmax) for Caffeine

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of caffeine. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Median)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates2.000
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg3.000

[back to top]

t1/2 for Pravastatin

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of pravastatin. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates3.189
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg3.156

[back to top]

t1/2 for Omeprazole

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of omeprazole. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates1.439
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg1.219

[back to top]

Treatment A: Change From Baseline in Hematocrit

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: hematocrit. Baseline for treatment A was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day -1), before the dose of Treatment A. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 10

InterventionProportion of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates-0.0090

[back to top]

AUC(0-infinity) for Midazolam

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of midazolam. The AUC(0-infinity) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates70.08
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg65.46

[back to top]

AUC(0-infinity) for Montelukast

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of montelukast. The AUC(0-infinity) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates2859
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg3109

[back to top]

AUC(0-infinity) for Omeprazole

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of omeprazole. The AUC(0-infinity) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates1127
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg1093

[back to top]

AUC(0-infinity) for Pravastatin

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of pravastatin. The AUC(0-infinity) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates72.09
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg43.70

[back to top]

AUC(0-t) for 1-hydroxymidazolam

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of 1-hydroxymidazolam. 1-hydroxymidazolam is a metabolite of midazolam. The AUC(0-t) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates31.07
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg28.07

[back to top]

AUC(0-t) for 36-hydroxymontelukast

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of 36-hydroxymontelukas. 36-hydroxymontelukast is a metabolite of montelukast. The AUC(0-t) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates234.2
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg230.9

[back to top]

t1/2 for Montelukast

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of montelukast. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates5.035
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg5.135

[back to top]

t1/2 for Midazolam

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of midazolam. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates5.756
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg5.222

[back to top]

AUC(0-t) for 5-hydroxyomeprazole

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of 5-hydroxyomeprazole. 5-hydroxyomeprazole is a metabolite of omeprazole. The AUC(0-t) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates713.5
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg785.1

[back to top]

AUC(0-t) for Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of alpha-hydroxymetoprolol. Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol is a metabolite of metoprolol. The AUC(0-t) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates531.3
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg487.9

[back to top]

AUC(0-t) for Digoxin

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of digoxin. The AUC(0-t) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours*picogram per milliliter (h*pg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates16690
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg17840

[back to top]

AUC(0-t) for Flurbiprofen

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of flurbiprofen. The AUC(0-t) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates64930
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg66170

[back to top]

AUC(0-t) for Metoprolol

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of metoprolol. The AUC(0-t) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates655.0
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg807.3

[back to top]

AUC(0-t) for Midazolam

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of midazolam. The AUC(0-t) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates67.11
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg62.95

[back to top]

AUC(0-t) for Montelukast

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of montelukast. The AUC(0-t) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates2724
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg2940

[back to top]

AUC(0-t) for Omeprazole

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of omeprazole. The AUC(0-t) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates728.1
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg817.9

[back to top]

AUC(0-t) for Pravastatin

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of pravastatin. The AUC(0-t) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates69.92
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg51.03

[back to top]

Cmax for 1-hydroxymidazolam

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of 1-hydroxymidazolam. 1-hydroxymidazolam is a metabolite of midazolam. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates7.933
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg6.722

[back to top]

Cmax for 36-hydroxymontelukast

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of 36-hydroxymontelukast. 36-hydroxymontelukast is a metabolite of montelukast. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates24.62
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg23.22

[back to top]

Cmax for 5-hydroxyomeprazole

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of 5-hydroxyomeprazole. 5-hydroxyomeprazole is a metabolite of omeprazole. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates181.1
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg203.3

[back to top]

Cmax for Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of alpha-hydroxymetoprolol. Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol is a metabolite of metoprolol. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates45.70
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg39.21

[back to top]

Cmax for Digoxin

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of digoxin. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionPicogram per milliliter (pg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates1026
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg1282

[back to top]

Cmax for Flurbiprofen

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of flurbiprofen. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates10220
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg10710

[back to top]

Cmax for Metoprolol

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of metoprolol. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates127.4
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg141.1

[back to top]

Cmax for Midazolam

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of midazolam. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates15.44
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg13.95

[back to top]

t1/2 for Metoprolol

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of metoprolol. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates4.872
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg5.342

[back to top]

t1/2 for Flurbiprofen

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of flurbiprofen. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates6.123
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg6.088

[back to top]

t1/2 for Digoxin

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of digoxin. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates40.279
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg38.784

[back to top]

t1/2 for Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of alpha-hydroxymetoprolol. Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol is a metabolite of metoprolol. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates8.040
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg8.339

[back to top]

t1/2 for 5-hydroxyomeprazole

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of 5-hydroxyomeprazole. 5-hydroxyomeprazole is a metabolite of omeprazole. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates1.580
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg1.569

[back to top]

t1/2 for 36-hydroxymontelukast

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of 36-hydroxymontelukast. 36-hydroxymontelukast is a metabolite of montelukast. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates5.310
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg5.644

[back to top]

t1/2 for 1-hydroxymidazolam

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of 1-hydroxymidazolam. 1-hydroxymidazolam is a metabolite of midazolam. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates3.632
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg3.717

[back to top]

Ratio of Cmax of Alpha-hydroxymetoprolol to Metoprolol

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of parent drug (metoprolol) and its metabolite (alpha-hydroxymetoprolol). Ratio of Cmax of metabolite to parent drug has been presented. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates0.7869
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg0.7066

[back to top]

Ratio of Cmax of 5-hydroxyomeprazole to Omeprazole

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of parent drug (omeprazole) and its metabolite (5-hydroxyomeprazole). Ratio of Cmax of metabolite to parent drug has been presented. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose in treatment period 1 and 3

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Treatment A: Probe Substrates0.9461
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg0.8810

[back to top]

Treatment C: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes

Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes. Baseline for treatment C was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits (Day 20), before the dose of Treatment C. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. (NCT04425902)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 20), Days 22 and 25

Intervention10^12 cells per liter (Mean)
Day 22Day 25
Treatment C: Probe Substrates + GSK3640254 200 mg-0.161-0.013

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Severity Grade 3 or Above Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities

Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 of Adverse Events and Laboratory abnormalities. Laboratory abnormalities were graded as Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe), Grade 4 (Life-threatening), Grade 5 (Death). Percentage of participants with Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were reported. (NCT04608344)
Timeframe: Sequence AB: First dose up to 47 days, Sequence BA: First dose up to 50 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Atorvastatin0
Pravastatin + Rosuvastatin0
Filgotinib3.8
Filgotinib + Atorvastatin0
Filgotinib + Pravastatin + Rosuvastatin0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. AE was therefore any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. TEAEs: AE with an onset date on or after the study drug start date and no later than 30 days after study drug stop date; or any AE leading to study drug discontinuation. (NCT04608344)
Timeframe: Sequence AB: First dose up to 47 days, Sequence BA: First dose up to 50 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Atorvastatin19.2
Pravastatin + Rosuvastatin24.0
Filgotinib65.4
Filgotinib + Atorvastatin7.7
Filgotinib + Pravastatin + Rosuvastatin11.5

[back to top]

PK Parameter: Cmax of ATV, PRA, and ROS

Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug. (NCT04608344)
Timeframe: AB (Days 1,3,12,14) and BA (Days 6,8,18,20): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 postdose; AB (Days 1,12) and BA (Days 6,18): 5,10,36 hours post dose; AB (Days 3,14) and BA (Days 8,20): 72 hours postdose

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
PRAROS
Filgotinib + Pravastatin + Rosuvastatin99.212.3
Pravastatin + Rosuvastatin84.27.5

[back to top]

PK Parameter: Cmax of ATV, PRA, and ROS

Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug. (NCT04608344)
Timeframe: AB (Days 1,3,12,14) and BA (Days 6,8,18,20): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 postdose; AB (Days 1,12) and BA (Days 6,18): 5,10,36 hours post dose; AB (Days 3,14) and BA (Days 8,20): 72 hours postdose

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
ATV
Atorvastatin19.7
Filgotinib + Atorvastatin15.0

[back to top]

PK Parameter: AUCinf of ATV, PRA, and ROS

AUCinf is defined as the concentration of drug extrapolated to infinite time. (NCT04608344)
Timeframe: AB (Days 1,3,12,14) and BA (Days 6,8,18,20): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 postdose; AB (Days 1,12) and BA (Days 6,18): 5,10,36 hours post dose; AB (Days 3,14) and BA (Days 8,20): 72 hours postdose

,
Interventionh*ng/mL (Mean)
PRAROS
Filgotinib + Pravastatin + Rosuvastatin234.892.3
Pravastatin + Rosuvastatin201.366.0

[back to top]

PK Parameter: AUCinf of ATV, PRA, and ROS

AUCinf is defined as the concentration of drug extrapolated to infinite time. (NCT04608344)
Timeframe: AB (Days 1,3,12,14) and BA (Days 6,8,18,20): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 postdose; AB (Days 1,12) and BA (Days 6,18): 5,10,36 hours post dose; AB (Days 3,14) and BA (Days 8,20): 72 hours postdose

,
Interventionh*ng/mL (Mean)
ATV
Atorvastatin80.8
Filgotinib + Atorvastatin71.8

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: AUClast of ATV, PRA, and ROS

AUClast is defined as the concentration of drug from time zero to the last observable concentration. (NCT04608344)
Timeframe: AB (Days 1,3,12,14) and BA (Days 6,8,18,20): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 postdose; AB (Days 1,12) and BA (Days 6,18): 5,10,36 hours post dose; AB (Days 3,14) and BA (Days 8,20): 72 hours postdose

,
Interventionh*ng/mL (Mean)
PRAROS
Filgotinib + Pravastatin + Rosuvastatin232.589.3
Pravastatin + Rosuvastatin199.562.6

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: AUClast of ATV, PRA, and ROS

AUClast is defined as the concentration of drug from time zero to the last observable concentration. (NCT04608344)
Timeframe: AB (Days 1,3,12,14) and BA (Days 6,8,18,20): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 postdose; AB (Days 1,12) and BA (Days 6,18): 5,10,36 hours post dose; AB (Days 3,14) and BA (Days 8,20): 72 hours postdose

,
Interventionh*ng/mL (Mean)
ATV
Atorvastatin78.8
Filgotinib + Atorvastatin70.2

[back to top]